Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC080009Planning and Environmental Commisson਍ഀ ACTION FORM਍ഀ TOWN ff YE਍ഀ RJNlrr DEVELOPW-NT਍ഀ Department of Community Development਍ഀ 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657਍ഀ tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452਍ഀ web: www.vailgov.com਍ഀ Project Name: NORTH DAY LOT MAI EXT AMEND PEC Number: PEC080009਍ഀ Project Description:਍ഀ Participants:਍ഀ FINAL APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR EXTERIOR ALTERATION FOR THE NORTH DAY LOT਍ഀ DEVELOPMENT਍ഀ OWNER VAIL CORP 02/25/2008਍ഀ PO BOX 7਍ഀ VAIL਍ഀ CO 81658਍ഀ APPLICANT MAURIELLO PLANNING GROUP, LL 02/25/2008 Phone: 970-748-0920਍ഀ PO BOX 1127਍ഀ AVON਍ഀ CO 81620਍ഀ License: 0000001697਍ഀ Project Address: 600 W LIONSHEAD CIR VAIL Location: NORTH DAY LOT਍ഀ CO Legal Description: Lot: 1 Block: 1 Subdivision: VAIL LIONSHEAD FIL 3਍ഀ Parcel Number: 2101-063-0800-4਍ഀ Comments: See conditions਍ഀ BOARD/STAFF ACTION਍ഀ Motion By: Kjesbo Action: APPROVED਍ഀ Second By: Viele਍ഀ Vote: 6-0-0 Date of Approval: 02/09/2009਍ഀ Conditions:਍ഀ Cond: 8਍ഀ (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of਍ഀ Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).਍ഀ Cond:300਍ഀ (PLAN): PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of਍ഀ approval.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010582਍ഀ The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the public skier drop-off, in a਍ഀ form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the extent, rights, and privileges਍ഀ associated with the permanent nine-space, public skier drop-off, for review and਍ഀ approval by no later than April 7, 2009.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010583਍ഀ The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the potential South Frontage਍ഀ Road access point into the site, in a form satisfactory to the Town, as depicted on਍ഀ Sheet C1.01, dated January 30, 2009, for review and approval by no later than April਍ഀ 7, 2009.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010584਍ഀ The Developer shall enter into a revised employee housing agreement, in a form਍ഀ satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the dates by which building permit਍ഀ applications will be submitted and construction shall commence. This agreement shall਍ഀ be in place by no later than April 7, 2009.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010585਍ഀ The Developer shall provide the Town a construction schedule for the North Day Lot਍ഀ employee housing and permanent skier drop-off projects for review and approval by਍ഀ the Town of Vail by no later than April 7, 2009. Said schedule shall include, but਍ഀ not be limited to, identification of a building permit submittal date, a਍ഀ commencement of construction date, and a completion of construction/delivery date਍ഀ for the projects. This schedule shall be utilized in the review of condition 3਍ഀ included with this approval.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010586਍ഀ The Developer submits a complete set of civil engineered drawings of the Approved਍ഀ Development Plans including the required off site improvements, to the Town of Vail਍ഀ Community Development Department for review and approval of the drawings, prior to਍ഀ making application for the issuance of a building permit for the North Day Lot਍ഀ improvements.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010587਍ഀ That the Developer shall provide a plan for review and approval by the appropriate਍ഀ reviewing authority, depending on the plan submitted, for replacement of the 105਍ഀ parking spaces currently on the North Day Lot. This plan shall be submitted to the਍ഀ Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and approval prior to਍ഀ submittal of building permits.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010588਍ഀ The Developer shall enter into a permanent skier drop-off operation and maintenance਍ഀ agreement, in a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the standards,਍ഀ responsibilities and procedures for the permanent skier drop-off facility on the਍ഀ North Day Lot, prior to submitting for building permits.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010589਍ഀ The Developer shall enter into a construction easement agreement for those਍ഀ improvements to be constructed on Town of Vail owned property (Tract C and Part of਍ഀ Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead, First Filing) adjacent to the development site, in a਍ഀ form satisfactory to the Town, prior to submitting for building permits.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010590਍ഀ The Developer shall submit a construction staging and parking plan to the Town of਍ഀ Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, prior to submitting਍ഀ for building permits. The purpose of the plan shall be to document how and where the਍ഀ Developer commits to providing the requisite construction staging and construction਍ഀ worker parking for the duration of the North Day Lot employee housing and skier਍ഀ drop-off construction project and to minimize the negative impacts of construction਍ഀ worker parking on existing public and private parking facilities.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010591਍ഀ The Developer shall submit a permanent cross-access easement for the use of a਍ഀ portion of Town land (Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing) for਍ഀ circulation needs associated with the employee housing project, in a form਍ഀ satisfactory to the Town, prior to requesting any certificate of occupancy for the਍ഀ project.਍ഀ Cond: CON0010592਍ഀ The Developer shall provide the Town with the legally executed and duly recorded਍ഀ deed restriction(s) with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office in a form਍ഀ satisfactory to the Town for the 120 on-site employee beds, prior to requesting any਍ഀ certificate of occupancy for the project.਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell PEC Fee Paid: $800.00਍ഀ I 0 n -਍ഀ a A਍ഀ Revised Conditions of Approval for the North ay Lot employee housing and skier I਍ഀ drop-off presented at the evening session public hearing March 3, 2009 W !l਍ഀ VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL਍ഀ On February 9, 2009, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved,਍ഀ with conditions, a request for a major exterior alteration to allow for the਍ഀ redevelopment of the property known as the "North Day Lot". The conditions਍ഀ placed on the approval were as follows:਍ഀ (Recommended modifications are shown in bold and stFi4~~Q9l4)਍ഀ 1) The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the public skier਍ഀ drop-off, in a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the extent,਍ഀ rights, and privileges associated with the permanent nine-space, public਍ഀ skier drop-off, for review and approval by no later than April 7, 2009.਍ഀ 2) The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the potential South਍ഀ Frontage Road access point into the site, in a form satisfactory to the਍ഀ Town, as depicted on Sheet C1.01, dated January 30, 2009, for review਍ഀ and approval by no later than April 7, 2009.਍ഀ 3) The Developer shall enter into a revised employee housing agreement, in਍ഀ a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the dates by which਍ഀ building permit applications will be submitted and construction shall਍ഀ commence.਍ഀ . This agreement਍ഀ shall be in place within 30 days of appFeval ef the FnajgF .਍ഀ by no later than April 7, 2009.਍ഀ 4) The-DeTeleppeF Shall -eRt into a-re'J1sed peRnanent skier dFop off਍ഀ shall਍ഀ pFejeGt whiGh GaR be negetiated by the Town rA Vail This agFeemeRt shall਍ഀ 5) The Developer shall provide the Town a construction schedule for the਍ഀ North Day Lot employee housing and permanent skier drop-off projects for਍ഀ review and approval by the Town of Vail਍ഀ the maj9F eAeFier alteF ati°n. by no later than April 7, 2009. Said਍ഀ schedule shall include, but not be limited to, identification of a building਍ഀ permit submittal date, a commencement of construction date, and a਍ഀ completion of construction/delivery date for the projects. This schedule਍ഀ shall be utilized in the review of condition 4 aRd-5 3 included with this਍ഀ approval.਍ഀ I^ a• e਍ഀ ii •਍ഀ . Cer Deeion Review਍ഀ 6) the DeTelopeF FeGeives fmR-;41-review and appFev l of the-PF9P9਍ഀ s►਍ഀ :=e+•• y਍ഀ Prior to Submitting for Building Permits਍ഀ 7) The Developer submits a complete set of civil engineered drawings of the਍ഀ Approved Development Plans including the required off site improvements,਍ഀ to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and਍ഀ approval of the drawings, prior to making application for the issuance of a਍ഀ building permit for the North Day Lot improvements.਍ഀ 8) That the Developer shall provide a plan for review and approval by the਍ഀ appropriate reviewing authority, depending on the plan submitted, for਍ഀ temperary replacement of the 105 parking spaces currently on the North਍ഀ Day Lot.਍ഀ €ver Van! er some the Prejec..The plan providing fer 105਍ഀ manor. shall he merle for the entirety of the time period that paFkiRg ir• not਍ഀ available en the Nerth Day Let OF in a neFFnaRPnt leeatien R--rh Cver਍ഀ This plan shall be pFevided submitted to the Town of Vail਍ഀ Community Development Department for review and approval prior to਍ഀ submittal of building permits.਍ഀ 9) The Developer shall enter into a permanent skier drop-off operation and਍ഀ maintenance agreement, in a form satisfactory to the Town, which਍ഀ establishes the standards, responsibilities and procedures for the਍ഀ permanent skier drop-off facility on the North Day Lot, prior to submitting਍ഀ for building permits.਍ഀ 10) The Developer shall enter into a construction਍ഀ easement agreement for those improvements to be constructed in T-FaG਍ഀ on Town of Vail owned property਍ഀ (Tract C and Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead, First Filing)਍ഀ adjacent to the development site, in a form satisfactory to the Town,਍ഀ prior to submitting for building permits.਍ഀ T) The Developer r•hall submit a eenctrUGtien anness easement for the work਍ഀ peFmaneRt s r਍ഀ new਍ഀ 12) The Developer shall submit a construction staging and parking plan਍ഀ to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review਍ഀ and approval, prior to submitting for building permits. The purpose਍ഀ of the plan shall be to document how and where the Developer਍ഀ commits to providing the requisite construction staging and਍ഀ construction worker parking for the duration of the North Day Lot਍ഀ K਍ഀ employee housing and skier drop-off construction project and to਍ഀ minimize the negative impacts of construction worker parking on਍ഀ existing public and private parking facilities.਍ഀ Prior to Requesting a Any Certificate of Occupancy਍ഀ 13) The Developer shall submit a permanent cross-access easement for the਍ഀ use of a portion of Town land (Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First਍ഀ Filing) for circulation needs associated with the employee housing project,਍ഀ in a form satisfactory to the Town, prior to requesting a any certificate of਍ഀ occupancy for the project.਍ഀ 14) The Developer shall provide the Town with the legally executed and duly਍ഀ recorded TypeIII deed restriction(s) with the Eagle County Clerk &਍ഀ Recorder's Office in a form satisfactory to the Town for the 32 en sate਍ഀ employee housing uRits 120 on-site employee beds, prior to the °e~a਍ഀ ef-a requesting any certificate of occupancy for the project.਍ഀ MEMORANDUM਍ഀ TO: Vail Town Council਍ഀ FROM: Community Development Department਍ഀ DATE: March 3, 2009਍ഀ SUBJECT: An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission's approval, with conditions, of a major exterior਍ഀ alteration, pursuant to Section 12-71-1-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town਍ഀ Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the property known as the "North Day Lot", with a਍ഀ multiple unit employee housing project, located at 600 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1,਍ഀ Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080009)਍ഀ Appellant: Vail Town Council਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell/George Ruther਍ഀ L SUMMARY਍ഀ On February 17, 2009, the Vail Town Council "called-up" the decision of the Town of Vail Planning਍ഀ and Environmental Commission granted an approval, with conditions, of a development application਍ഀ intended to facilitate the construction of a multiple unit employee housing project and public skier਍ഀ drop facility. The expressed purpose of the call-up is to allow the Town Council the opportunity to਍ഀ evaluate and consider the required conditions of approval.਍ഀ II. SUBJECT PROPERTY਍ഀ The subject property, the "North Day Lot", is located at 600 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1,਍ഀ Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3.਍ഀ III. STANDING OF APPELLANT਍ഀ Pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, the Vail Town Council has standing to "call-਍ഀ up" a decision of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission.਍ഀ IV. REQUIRED ACTION਍ഀ The Vail Town Council shall uphold, overturn, or modify the Town of Vail Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission conditions of approval.਍ഀ Pursuant to Sub-section 12-3-3-C5, Vail Town Code, the Town Council is required to make਍ഀ findings of fact in accordance with the Vail Town Code:਍ഀ "The Town Council shall on all appeals make specific findings of fact based directly਍ഀ on the particular evidence presented to it. These findings of fact must support਍ഀ conclusions that the standards and conditions imposed by the requirements of this਍ഀ title (i. e. Title 12, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code) have or have not been met. "਍ഀ V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION਍ഀ The Community Development Department recommends the Vail Town Council modifies the਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission conditions of approval. Staffs recommendation is਍ഀ based upon our review of the conditions and the necessary sequencing of events that must਍ഀ occur and existing obligations (ie, skier drop off) that must be addressed by the applicant.਍ഀ A summary of the modifications to theconditions of approval include:਍ഀ • Accelerating the timeframe for providing the skier drop-off easement and South Frontage਍ഀ Road easements to April 7, 2009 to ensure that the Town receives these commitments਍ഀ regardless of the timing of the employee housing improvements,਍ഀ • Modifying the timeframe for compliance with the housing agreement, permanent skier drop਍ഀ off agreement and approval of a proposed construction schedule to 57 days to allow for਍ഀ Town Council review on March 3d, March 17th, and April 7th Town Council meetings,਍ഀ • Eliminating the obligation for Design Review Board approval as this action was completed਍ഀ on February 18, 2009 and thus no longer needed,਍ഀ • Further clarifying the requirement for no net loss of 105 existing parking spaces in਍ഀ Lionshead,਍ഀ • Eliminated redundancy between several of the conditions and combined them into one new਍ഀ condition, and;਍ഀ • Adding a condition requiring the review and approval of a construction staging and parking਍ഀ plan.਍ഀ Should the Vail Town Council choose to modify the request, the Community Development਍ഀ Department recommends the following motion:਍ഀ "The Town Council modifies the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental਍ഀ Commission's conditions of approval, of a request for a final review of a major਍ഀ exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, ExteriorAlterations or Modifications,਍ഀ Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the property known as the "North਍ഀ Day Lot", with a multiple unit employee housing project, located at 600 West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth਍ഀ details in regard thereto. (PEC08-0009). "਍ഀ Should the Vail Town Council choose to modify the conditions, the Community Development਍ഀ Department recommends the following finding:਍ഀ "Pursuant to Section 12-3-3-C5, the Vail Town Council finds, in accordance with the਍ഀ Vail Town Code, that the modified conditions ensure that the requirements of the਍ഀ Zoning Regulations and the obligations required of the prior approvals have been਍ഀ met and/or will be met as a result of the modifications "਍ഀ VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL਍ഀ On February 9, 2009, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved, with conditions, a਍ഀ request for a major exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the property known as the਍ഀ "North Day Lot". The conditions placed on the approval were as follows:਍ഀ (Recommended modifications are shown in bold and s#iket#Feugfi)਍ഀ 1) The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the public skier drop-off, in a form਍ഀ satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the extent, rights, and privileges associated with਍ഀ 2਍ഀ the permanent nine-space, public skier drop-off, for review and approval by no later than਍ഀ April 7, 2009.਍ഀ 2) The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the potential South Frontage Road਍ഀ access point into the site, in a form satisfactory to the Town, as depicted on Sheet C1.01,਍ഀ dated January 30, 2009, for review and approval by no later than April 7, 2009. pF+erte਍ഀ 3) The Developer shall enter into a revised employee housing agreement, in a form਍ഀ satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the dates by which building permit applications਍ഀ will be submitted and construction shall commence for the letter of credit currently posted as਍ഀ security for the project, which can be negotiated by the Town of Vail. This agreement shall਍ഀ be in place . by no later than਍ഀ April 7, 2009.਍ഀ seGUFity fGF the pFojeGt whiGh GaR be negotiated by the Town of Vail. Thus agFeemeRt਍ഀ 5) The Developer shall provide the Town a construction schedule for the North Day Lot਍ഀ employee housing and permanent skier drop-off projects for review and approval by the਍ഀ Town of Vail within 30 days of the approval of the FnajGF exteFioF alteFatiwlk by no later਍ഀ than April 7, 2009. Said schedule shall include, but not be limited to, identification of a਍ഀ building permit submittal date, a commencement of construction date, and a completion of਍ഀ construction/delivery date for the projects. This schedule shall be utilized in the review of਍ഀ condition 4,and-5 3 included with this approval.਍ഀ 6਍ഀ Th਍ഀ D਍ഀ v਍ഀ l਍ഀ Fevai of the਍ഀ m਍ഀ esed develo਍ഀ ment਍ഀ lan b਍ഀ final Feview and a਍ഀ )਍ഀ e਍ഀ e਍ഀ e਍ഀ e਍ഀ pp਍ഀ p਍ഀ p਍ഀ p਍ഀ p਍ഀ y਍ഀ buiidiRgpeFmit-਍ഀ Prior to Submitting for Building Permits਍ഀ 7) The Developer submits a complete set of civil engineered drawings of the Approved਍ഀ Development Plans including the required off site improvements, to the Town of Vail਍ഀ Community Development Department for review and approval of the drawings, prior to਍ഀ making application for the issuance of a building permit for the North Day Lot improvements.਍ഀ 8) That the Developer shall provide a plan for review and approval by the appropriate਍ഀ reviewing authority, depending on the plan submitted, for tempera replacement of the 105਍ഀ parking spaces currently on the North Day Lot. that Will Rot be available dwing਍ഀ This plan shall be pFevided਍ഀ submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for review and਍ഀ approval prior to submittal of building permits.਍ഀ 3਍ഀ 9) The Developer shall enter into a permanent skier drop-off operation and maintenance਍ഀ Awk 1W agreement, in a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the standards,਍ഀ responsibilities and procedures for the permanent skier drop-off facility on the North Day਍ഀ Lot, prior to submitting for building permits.਍ഀ 10) The Developer shall enter into a construction easement agreement਍ഀ for those improvements to be constructed in TFaGt G, Blerk 1, Vail Lienshead Filing , on਍ഀ Town of Vail owned property (Tract C and Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead, First਍ഀ Filing) adjacent to the development site, in a form satisfactory to the Town, prior to਍ഀ submitting for building permits.਍ഀ 12) The Developer shall submit a construction staging and parking plan to the Town of਍ഀ Vail Community Development Department for review and approval, prior to਍ഀ submitting for building permits. The purpose of the plan shall be to document how਍ഀ and where the Developer commits to providing the requisite construction staging and਍ഀ construction worker parking for the duration of the North Day Lot employee housing਍ഀ and skier drop-off construction project and to minimize the negative impacts of਍ഀ construction worker parking on existing public and private parking facilities.਍ഀ Prior to Requesting a Any Certificate of Occupancy਍ഀ 13) The Developer shall submit a permanent cross-access easement for the use of a portion of਍ഀ Town land (Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing) for circulation needs਍ഀ associated with the employee housing project, in a form satisfactory to the Town, prior to਍ഀ requesting a any certificate of occupancy for the project਍ഀ 14) The Developer shall provide the Town with the legally executed and duly recorded Type I II਍ഀ deed restrictions with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's Office for the 32 on-site਍ഀ employee housing units, prior to the requesting any certificate of occupancy਍ഀ for the project.਍ഀ 4਍ഀ THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY਍ഀ PUBLIC NOTICE਍ഀ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing਍ഀ in accordance with Section 12-3-6, Hearings, Vail Town Code, on Tuesday, March 3, 2009, at਍ഀ 6:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:਍ഀ ITEM/TOPIC:਍ഀ An appeal, pursuant to Section 12-3-3, Appeals, Vail Town Code, of the Town of Vail Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission's approval of major exterior alterations, pursuant to Section 1 Z7H-7,਍ഀ Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the property਍ഀ known as the "North Day Lot", with a multiple unitemployee housing project, located at 600 West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Fling 3, and setting forth details in regard਍ഀ thereto. (PEC080009)਍ഀ Appellant: Vail Town Council਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell਍ഀ The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during਍ഀ regular office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage਍ഀ Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public਍ഀ hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for਍ഀ additional information.਍ഀ Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)਍ഀ 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.਍ഀ MEMORANDUM਍ഀ To: Vail Town Council਍ഀ From: Community Development Department਍ഀ Date: February 17, 2009਍ഀ Re: PEC Decision Call-up/Appeal Criteria਍ഀ The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a brief summary of the call-up/appeal਍ഀ procedures for a Planning & Environmental Commission decision. A complete਍ഀ description can be found in Chapter 3, Zoning Regulations, Vail Town Code.਍ഀ Zoning Regulations਍ഀ Section 12-3-3 (C), Appeals, of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations prescribes the਍ഀ procedures by which the Town Council may call-up a decision of the Planning &਍ഀ Environmental Commission.਍ഀ According the Zoning Regulations, in summary,਍ഀ • The town council shall have the authority to hear and decide call-ups ("appeals")਍ഀ of any decision, determination, or interpretation of the PEC਍ഀ • A call-up may be initiated by the Town Council upon a majority vote of those਍ഀ present਍ഀ • A call up must occur with 20 calendar days of the decision, determination or਍ഀ interpretation being made਍ഀ • 15 day notice to adjacent property owners is required਍ഀ • A call-up stays all future activity on the application until the call-up is heard and਍ഀ concluded਍ഀ • The town council shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the਍ഀ evidence and testimony presented. Findings of fact must support conclusions that਍ഀ the standards and conditions imposed have or have not been met (ie, why was the਍ഀ decision in err?, what code section was wrongly interpreted?, how do the਍ഀ conditions imposed not apply?, etc.)਍ഀ Failure to fully comply with the prescribed zoning regulations may result in a CRCP Rule਍ഀ 106 (A) (4) action against the Town.਍ഀ RA-w~ Li~e -q-r APcl ik)a;A' c4l'gpA਍ഀ TOWN OF VAIL਍ഀ C/O FINANCE DEPT਍ഀ 75 S FRONTAGE RD਍ഀ CO 81657਍ഀ BOSELLI FAMILY PTNSHP਍ഀ 3195 LAFAYETTE DR਍ഀ BOULDER, CO 80303਍ഀ VAIL SPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION਍ഀ DANN PETER਍ഀ PO BOX 5480,਍ഀ AVON, CO 81620਍ഀ VAIL CORP਍ഀ PO BOX 7਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81658਍ഀ LANDMARK CONDO ASSOCIATION਍ഀ GEOFFREY WRIGHT਍ഀ 610 W LIONSHEAD CR਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ CONCERT HALL PLAZA CONDOMINIUM਍ഀ ASSOCIATION਍ഀ JENNIFER L LUFMAN਍ഀ 1700 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 2400,਍ഀ DENVER, CO 80203਍ഀ MONTANEROS CONDOMINIUM਍ഀ ASSOCIATION, INC.਍ഀ KEITH ODZA਍ഀ 641 W LIONSHEAD CIR,਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ THE MARK-LODGE CONDOMINIUM਍ഀ ASSOCIATION, INC.਍ഀ DAVE PEASE਍ഀ 715 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ DIAMONDROCK VAIL OWNER LLC਍ഀ C/O DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY CO਍ഀ 6903 ROCKLEDGE DR STE 800਍ഀ BETHESDA, MD 20817਍ഀ FINK, DAVID H. & AMY L.਍ഀ 2900 LAKEWOODS CT਍ഀ W BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323਍ഀ VAIL VALLEY RENTALS LLC਍ഀ 140 FAIRFAX ST਍ഀ DENVER, CO 80220਍ഀ ARTINIAN, RON਍ഀ 5 BRISTOL DR਍ഀ MANHASSET, NY 11030਍ഀ KUSHNER, SANDRA R. & LOUIS਍ഀ C/O ROTHMAN GORDON FOREMAN &਍ഀ GROUDINE PC਍ഀ THIRD FLOOR GRANT BUILDING਍ഀ PITTSBURGH, PA 15219਍ഀ ENZIAN AT VAIL CONDOMINIUM਍ഀ ASSOCIATION਍ഀ GEOFFREY WRIGHT਍ഀ 610 W LIONSHEAD CIR,਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ CDOT਍ഀ 4201 E. ARKANSAS AVENUE਍ഀ DENVER, CO 80222਍ഀ HAVENS SEPARATE PROPERTY LIVING VAIL CORP਍ഀ TRUST C/O VAIL RESORTS DEV CO਍ഀ GARY J. HAVENS TRUSTEE PO BOX 959਍ഀ 226 14TH ST AVON, CO 81620਍ഀ SANTA MONICA, CA 90402਍ഀ SCHNELL, PAUL & MADELEINE D. LIONSHEAD INN LLC਍ഀ 225 CENTRAL PARK 705 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE਍ഀ NEW YORK, NY 10024 VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ INFINITY HOLDINGS AT VAIL LLC਍ഀ 7400 E CRESTLINE CIR 125਍ഀ GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111਍ഀ LIONSHEAD INN LLC਍ഀ MARA M. KLEINSCHMIDT਍ഀ PO BOX 1050਍ഀ EAGLE, CO 81631਍ഀ BILLOTTI, PATRICIA਍ഀ 18 POWDER HILL਍ഀ SADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458਍ഀ ECCKER, JOHN F. & PATRICIA L.਍ഀ 7734 LAUREL LEAF DR਍ഀ POTOMAC, MD 20854਍ഀ CAPLA, TOMAS J. & JUDITH J਍ഀ 2500 JOHNSON AVE਍ഀ RIVERDALE, NY 10463਍ഀ VAIL MANAGEMENT COMPANY -਍ഀ WESTWIND਍ഀ C/O VAIL MANAGEMENT COMPANY,਍ഀ PO BOX 6130਍ഀ AVON, CO 81620਍ഀ HUGHES LAND HOLDING TRUST਍ഀ 28 ANACAPA ST. SUITE D਍ഀ SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101਍ഀ MPG, LLC਍ഀ PO Box 1127਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620਍ഀ S, JEFF P. VAIL SPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOC਍ഀ 9 KIMBALL DR 710 W LIONSHEAD CIR਍ഀ DURHAM, NC 27705 VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ MEMORANDUM਍ഀ TO: Planning and Environmental Commission਍ഀ FROM: Community Development Department਍ഀ DATE: February 9, 2009਍ഀ SUBJECT: A request for a final review of major exterior alterations, pursuant to਍ഀ Section 12-7H-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to਍ഀ allow for the redevelopment of the property known as the "North Day Lot",਍ഀ with a multiple unit employee housing project, located at 600 West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and਍ഀ setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080009)਍ഀ Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by਍ഀ Mauriello Planning Group, LLC਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell਍ഀ SUMMARY਍ഀ The applicant, Vail Resort Development Company, represented by Mauriello਍ഀ Planning Group LLC, is requesting final review of a major exterior alteration,਍ഀ pursuant to Section 12-71-1-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail਍ഀ Town Code, and a reduction in the required off street parking pursuant to Section਍ഀ 12-10-20, Special Review Provisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for the਍ഀ redevelopment of the North Day Lot, currently parking, to include a 32 unit਍ഀ employee housing project, 9 public skier drop off spaces, and 40 parking spaces,਍ഀ located at 600 West Lionshead Circle.਍ഀ Upon review of the applicable elements of the Town's planning documents and਍ഀ adopted criteria for review, the Community Development Department is਍ഀ recommending the Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with਍ഀ conditions, the applicant's request for a major exterior alteration and reduction਍ഀ in the off-street parking requirements. A complete summary of Staff's review is਍ഀ provided in Section VIII of this memorandum.਍ഀ II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST਍ഀ The applicant, Vail Resort Development Company, represented by Mauriello਍ഀ Planning Group LLC, is requesting final review of a major exterior alteration,਍ഀ pursuant to Section 12-7H-7, Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail਍ഀ Town Code, and a reduction in the required off street parking pursuant to Section਍ഀ 12-10-20, Special Review Provisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for the਍ഀ redevelopment of the North Day Lot which is currently a 105 space parking lot for਍ഀ Vail Resorts employees.਍ഀ The key elements of the North Day Lot redevelopment include:਍ഀ A major exterior alteration to construct 32, Type III employee housing਍ഀ units, consisting of 28-four bedroom units and 4-three bedroom units for a਍ഀ total of 124 beds;਍ഀ A request for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from਍ഀ 45 to 40 parking spaces. The provision of 40 parking spaces includes 27਍ഀ which are enclosed within the lowest level of the proposed structure; and਍ഀ The inclusion of 9 public skier drop-off spaces on the west end of the site;਍ഀ A copy of the document entitled North Day Lot Employee Housing dated revised਍ഀ January 30, 2009 (Attachment B), and a reduced set of plans dated February 4,਍ഀ 2009, are attached for reference (Attachment A).਍ഀ III. BACKGROUND਍ഀ • The subject property was annexed into the Town of Vail by Ordinance No.਍ഀ 8, Series of 1969, which became effective on August 23, 1969.਍ഀ • On December 15, 1998, the Town of Vail adopted the Lionshead਍ഀ Redevelopment Master Plan, which contained site specific਍ഀ recommendations for the North Day Lot.਍ഀ • On September 27, 2004 the Lionshead Core Site (Arrabelle) was਍ഀ approved which removed the Sunbird Lodge containing employee਍ഀ housing. A requirement of the Arrabelle approval and the removal of the਍ഀ Sunbird Lodge was that 120 employee beds needed to be constructed.਍ഀ • Over the past several months the Town and Vail Resorts Development਍ഀ Company have been exploring how to jointly locate employee housing਍ഀ and a transit center on the site. The conclusion was, that while these਍ഀ uses could be jointly located on the site, the Town was not prepared to਍ഀ invest the resources at this time into a transit facility on this site.਍ഀ IV. ROLES OF THE REVIEWING BOARDS਍ഀ The purpose of this section of the memorandum is to clarify the responsibilities of਍ഀ the Design Review Board, Planning and Environmental Commission, Town਍ഀ Council, and Staff on the various applications submitted on behalf of Vail Resorts਍ഀ Development Company.਍ഀ Exterior Alteration/Modification in the Lionshead Mixed-Use I zone਍ഀ district਍ഀ Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission for impacts of use/development਍ഀ and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed਍ഀ buildings and site planning.਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission:਍ഀ Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for਍ഀ final approval/denial of a Major/Minor Exterior Alteration. The Planning਍ഀ and Environmental Commission shall review the proposal for compliance਍ഀ with the adopted criteria. The Planning and Environmental Commission's਍ഀ approval "shall constitute approval of the basic form and location of਍ഀ improvements including siting, building setbacks, height, building bulk and਍ഀ mass, site improvements and landscaping."਍ഀ 2਍ഀ Design Review Board.਍ഀ Action: The Design Review Board has no review authority on a Major or਍ഀ Minor Exterior Alteration, but must review any accompanying Design਍ഀ Review Board application.਍ഀ Town Council:਍ഀ Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental਍ഀ Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town਍ഀ Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals਍ഀ or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the਍ഀ board's decision.਍ഀ V. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS਍ഀ Staff has provided portions of the Vail Town Code and several master plans਍ഀ which are relevant to the proposed topics for the review of the proposed਍ഀ redevelopment proposal.਍ഀ Zoning Regulations਍ഀ Lionshead Mixed Use -1 Zone District (in part)਍ഀ 12-7H-1: PURPOSE.਍ഀ The Lionshead Mixed Use-1 zone district is intended to provide sites for a਍ഀ mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, time਍ഀ shares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial਍ഀ establishments in a clustered, unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone਍ഀ district, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, is਍ഀ intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities਍ഀ appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the਍ഀ desirable qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development਍ഀ standards. This District is meant to encourage and provide incentives for਍ഀ redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.਍ഀ 12-7H-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS:਍ഀ Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct਍ഀ impacts of their development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation਍ഀ shall bear a reasonable relation to the development impacts. Impacts may be਍ഀ determined based on reports prepared by qualified consultants. The extent of਍ഀ mitigation and public amenity improvements shall be balanced with the goals of਍ഀ redevelopment and will be determined by the planning and environmental਍ഀ commission in review of development projects and conditional use permits.਍ഀ Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, the following: roadway਍ഀ improvements, pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements,਍ഀ stream tracbbank improvements, public art improvements, and similar਍ഀ improvements. The intent of this section is to only require mitigation for large਍ഀ scale redevelopment/development projects which produce substantial off site਍ഀ impacts.਍ഀ Off Street Parking and Loading (in part)਍ഀ 12-10-20: Special Review Provisions:਍ഀ Notwithstanding the provisions of section 12-10-18 of this chapter, the planning਍ഀ and environmental commission may approve a reduction to the number of਍ഀ required spaces specified in section 12-10-10 of this chapter, provided a report਍ഀ documenting the presence of unique parking characteristics is provided by a਍ഀ qualified consultant and the following findings are made by the planning and਍ഀ environmental commission:਍ഀ A. The parking demand will be less than the requirements identified in section਍ഀ 12-10-10 of this chapter; and਍ഀ B. The probable long term use of the building or structure, based on its design,਍ഀ will not generate additional parking demand; and਍ഀ C. The use or activity is part of a demonstrated permanent program (including,਍ഀ but not limited to, "rideshare" programs, shuttle service, or staggered work਍ഀ shifts) intended to reduce parking demand that has been incorporated into਍ഀ the project's final approved development plan; and਍ഀ D. Proximity or availability of alternative modes of transportation (including, but਍ഀ not limited to, public transit or shuttle services) is significant and integral to਍ഀ the nature of the use or business activity.਍ഀ In reaching a decision, the planning and environmental commission shall਍ഀ consider survey data submitted by a qualified transportation planning or਍ഀ engineering consultant. Projects under "special review" are subject to additional਍ഀ scrutiny by the planning and environmental commission after development plan਍ഀ approval if it is deemed necessary to verify continued compliance with the above਍ഀ listed criteria. The maximum allowable reduction in the number of required਍ഀ spaces shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the total number required਍ഀ under section 12-10-10 of this chapter.਍ഀ Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan (in part)਍ഀ Chapter 2, Introduction਍ഀ 2.3 Policy Objectives਍ഀ The Town Council adopted six policy objectives on November 4,਍ഀ 1996 to outline the important issues to be addressed in the master਍ഀ plan and to provide a policy framework for the master planning਍ഀ process.਍ഀ 2.3.1 Renewal and Redevelopment਍ഀ Lionshead can and should be renewed and redeveloped to਍ഀ become a warmer, more vibrant environment for guests਍ഀ and residents. Lionshead needs an appealing and਍ഀ 4਍ഀ coherent identity, a sense of place, a personality, a਍ഀ purpose, and an improved aesthetic character.਍ഀ 2.3.2 Vitality and Amenities਍ഀ We must seize the opportunity to enhance guest਍ഀ experience and community interaction through expanded਍ഀ and additional activities and amenities such as performing਍ഀ arts venues, conference facilities, ice rinks, streetscape,਍ഀ parks and other recreational improvements.਍ഀ 2.3.4 Improved Access and Circulation਍ഀ The flow of pedestrian, vehicular, bicycle and mass transit਍ഀ traffic must be improved within and through Lionshead.਍ഀ 2.3.5 Improved Infrastructure਍ഀ The infrastructure of Lionshead (streets, walkways,਍ഀ transportation systems, parking, utilities, loading and਍ഀ delivery systems, snow removal and storage capacity) and਍ഀ its public and private services must be upgraded to support਍ഀ redevelopment and revitalization efforts and to meet the਍ഀ service expectations of our guests and residents.਍ഀ Chapter 3 - Existing Conditions Assessment਍ഀ 3.9.4 Vail Associates Employee Parking਍ഀ Vail Associates currently utilizes two large surface parking਍ഀ lots within the study area for its employee parking needs.਍ഀ The North Day Lot (see fi_gure 3-15), with a capacity of਍ഀ approximately 105 cars, is located behind the Landmark਍ഀ tower and is the site proposed for a transportation facility,਍ഀ employee housing, and other uses contemplated under the਍ഀ zoning on the property (LMU-1). The west day lot, -located਍ഀ just west of the Marriott parking structure, has an਍ഀ approximate capacity of 160 cars and represents a਍ഀ significant development opportunity. Parking displaced by਍ഀ redevelopment of these sites must be replaced within the਍ഀ Lionshead study area to satisfy the ground rule requiring਍ഀ no net loss of parking. The displaced parking will be਍ഀ provided in West Lionshead within a parking structure਍ഀ included as part of the EverVail project.਍ഀ Chapter 4, Master Plan Recommendations - Overall Study Area਍ഀ This section of the master plan addresses issues that affect Lionshead as a਍ഀ whole. These issues, and recommendations to address them, should be਍ഀ considered in all planning and policy decisions as Lionshead develops.਍ഀ 4.5.2.1 Relocate the Regional Transit Stop਍ഀ It is recommended that the Lionshead regional transit stop,਍ഀ currently located at the Lionshead Place cul-de-sac, be਍ഀ relocated to the proposed North Day Lot, the Lionshead਍ഀ parking structure, and West Lionshead. This will provide a਍ഀ Lionshead connection between the regional transit system਍ഀ and the Town of Vail transit system. In addition, visitors਍ഀ and employees coming to Lionshead by regional bus will਍ഀ arrive at a defined portal instead of the current "back door"਍ഀ on Lionshead Place. Finally, this will remove the large਍ഀ regional buses from West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead਍ഀ Place. It may be possible to locate elements of a regional਍ഀ transit stop in the West Lionshead area in conjunction with਍ഀ a new ski lift and parking facility. However, given its਍ഀ location on the periphery of Lionshead, this area may not਍ഀ be the most viable location for a regional transit stop.਍ഀ Notwithstanding the above, facilities for skier drop-off,਍ഀ private shuttle vans and Town of Vail in-town buses should਍ഀ be included in the design of the ski lift and parking facility.਍ഀ In 2006, the Town of Vail initiated an update of the Vail਍ഀ Transportation Master Plan. In addition, the Town initiated਍ഀ a development competition for the Lionshead Parking਍ഀ Structure redevelopment, which would include a transit਍ഀ facility. It is anticipated that the Transportation Master਍ഀ Plan update along with the conclusion of the Lionshead਍ഀ Parking Structure redevelopment process will provide਍ഀ direction on the ultimate location for a Lionshead Transit਍ഀ Facility and/or the type of transit facilities that may be਍ഀ necessary in West Lionshead.਍ഀ 4.8 Parking਍ഀ Parking is a critical component in a mixed-use resort environment਍ഀ such as Lionshead, and any efforts to enhance this component਍ഀ should adhere to the following goals and guidelines:਍ഀ a. Parking must be sufficient to meet demand. Correctly਍ഀ assessing parking demand in an environment such as਍ഀ Lionshead is difficult but extremely important.਍ഀ Overestimating parking demand can be as damaging as਍ഀ underestimating demand due to the extreme expense of਍ഀ parking space (especially if structured) in a real estate਍ഀ environment such as the Vail Valley. Likewise, parking is a਍ഀ large consumer of ground and should be designed to occupy਍ഀ as little real estate as possible. In tight margin developments਍ഀ such as mid-range hotels and locals/employee housing, the਍ഀ expense of parking can be the deciding factor as to the਍ഀ economic viability of the project. Due to these attributes of਍ഀ parking, it is important that true demand, or desired demand,਍ഀ be distinguished from actual usage. For example, the "free਍ഀ after three" program currently in place for the Town of Vail਍ഀ parking structures has undoubtedly increased the usage of਍ഀ 6਍ഀ these structures during the evening hours (the Lionshead਍ഀ structure filled in the evening for the first time in 1998).਍ഀ However, there has not been a corresponding increase in਍ഀ sales tax revenue, which was the original intent of "free after਍ഀ three". (Note- concrete studies regarding the utilization of the਍ഀ "free after three" program have not been conducted and it is਍ഀ strongly recommended that this occur if the program is to਍ഀ continue). It is hypothesized that a significant portion of਍ഀ people utilizing the free parking program are in fact employees਍ഀ or people that would have used transit or other means of਍ഀ access if the parking were not as readily available. In other਍ഀ words, parking usage often will rise to fill the available space,਍ഀ but the profile of the user may not be who the parking was਍ഀ intended for. To be concise, the parking supply in Lionshead਍ഀ and the Town of Vail needs to not only meet the demand, it਍ഀ needs to meet the desired demand and should be structured਍ഀ or programmed in such as way to do so. Parking is important,਍ഀ but too expensive and land consuming to be provided without਍ഀ solid reasoning.਍ഀ a. Parking should be visually inconspicuous. Parking should be਍ഀ structured below ground whenever possible. Surface parking਍ഀ areas should be heavily screened with landscaping, berms,਍ഀ and walls. Expanses of asphalt should be interrupted with਍ഀ islands of landscaping or replaced with pedestrian quality਍ഀ paving materials. Surface parking areas should be avoided in਍ഀ or near the retail pedestrian core area. Although structured਍ഀ parking may be more desirable visually, it must be properly਍ഀ designed so as not to detract from the guest's arrival਍ഀ experience.਍ഀ 4.9 Housing਍ഀ 4.9.4 Potential Housing Sites਍ഀ Following are specific sites that have been identified as਍ഀ suitable for locals and employee housing (see Map M.਍ഀ 4.9.4.3 Vail Associates Service Yard Holy Cross Site,਍ഀ Vail Professional Building, Cascade Crossing,਍ഀ North Day Lot, and the former gas station site਍ഀ All redevelopment in West Lionshead will need to਍ഀ conform to the Town's housing policies and਍ഀ requirements. In order to create activity and਍ഀ vibrancy in West Lionshead it is appropriate to਍ഀ include some dispersed employee housing਍ഀ opportunities for permanent local residents in਍ഀ proposed developments in the area consistent਍ഀ with these policies.਍ഀ Perhaps the most Promising locations to਍ഀ replace the Sunbird affordable housin4਍ഀ 7਍ഀ project and to conform to the Town's housing਍ഀ policies and requirements for new employee਍ഀ housing --generation in Lionshead are the਍ഀ North Day Lot, Vail Associates service yard, and਍ഀ Holy Cross site. However, housing is not the only਍ഀ use these three properties will need to support.਍ഀ The North Day lot is considered to be the਍ഀ preferred location for a significant housing਍ഀ project in Lionshead to replace the Sunbird਍ഀ affordable housing project and provide਍ഀ housing for new employee --generation. The਍ഀ North Day Lot may also need to accommodate a਍ഀ transit center on the ground level of the਍ഀ development site. Additionally, it may be਍ഀ necessary to develop a higher revenue-਍ഀ generating product on a portion of the Vail਍ഀ Associates service yard, Holy Cross, Vail਍ഀ Professional Building, and Cascade Crossing਍ഀ sites in order to defray the cost of road and਍ഀ infrastructure improvements.਍ഀ In planning the site, the following issues need to਍ഀ be considered. While it is important that buildings਍ഀ here be visually consistent with the overall਍ഀ character of Lionshead, the desire to maximize਍ഀ the housing potential may make appropriate the਍ഀ following deviations from standard development਍ഀ parameters:਍ഀ a. Density਍ഀ The site offers a unique opportunity to achieve਍ഀ significant density. It is recommended that the਍ഀ standards for density (units per acre) be਍ഀ increased at this location to allow for a greater਍ഀ number of employee housing units. While it is਍ഀ important that buildings here be visually਍ഀ consistent with the overall character of਍ഀ Lionshead, the desire to maximize the housing਍ഀ potential may make appropriate the following਍ഀ deviations from standard development਍ഀ parameters.਍ഀ b. Building Height for Employee Housing਍ഀ It may be appropriate to allow for a greater overall਍ഀ building height than is otherwise allowed under਍ഀ the Lionshead Architectural Design Guidelines.਍ഀ Any increase in building height will need to be਍ഀ reviewed on a case by case basis by the Town of਍ഀ Vail, and any eventual building height will still਍ഀ need to be visually appropriate for this location.਍ഀ c. Parking਍ഀ It may be appropriate to reduce the parking਍ഀ requirements for employee housing at this਍ഀ location --given the sites proximity to਍ഀ transportation facilities, jobs, and pedestrian਍ഀ routes. In consideration for reducing employee਍ഀ parking for the housing provided on this site,਍ഀ parking for other employees of the owner਍ഀ provided on this site should be considered.਍ഀ Excess parking may be used to satisfy the no net਍ഀ loss of parking policy or for future parking਍ഀ requirements of other development on the਍ഀ property.਍ഀ d. Site Coverage and Landscape Area and਍ഀ Setbacks਍ഀ Consideration should also be given to increasing਍ഀ site coverage and reducing setbacks and਍ഀ landscape area in order to maximize the amount਍ഀ of employee housing on the site and/or due to਍ഀ impacts associated with the development of a਍ഀ public transportation facility on the property. With਍ഀ any deviation to development standards਍ഀ prescribed in the master plan and zoning਍ഀ regulations, consideration of impacts should be਍ഀ afforded to the neighboring residential uses to the਍ഀ North Day Lot. Any design with such deviations਍ഀ will need to be sensitive to creating good designs਍ഀ with mitigation measures such as heated਍ഀ sidewalks and well planned landscape materials.਍ഀ Additionally due to impacts from the Town's਍ഀ dispersed transportation center on neighboring਍ഀ residential uses, mitigation measures should be਍ഀ provided to buffer and screen residential uses.਍ഀ e. Encroachments on Town Land਍ഀ The Town of Vail owns a small parcel of land on਍ഀ the north side of the north day lot which਍ഀ accommodates the pedestrian bridge over the਍ഀ interstate highway. This land was dedicated to਍ഀ the Town by Vail Associates in 1976. In order to਍ഀ allow for more efficient layout and਍ഀ development of employee housing on the site਍ഀ and/or the dispersed transportation facility,਍ഀ the Town should --give consideration to਍ഀ allowing development of employee housing਍ഀ and/or transportation uses on this parcel of਍ഀ land as part of the development of the north਍ഀ day lot,਍ഀ 9਍ഀ Chapter 5 - Detailed Plan Recommendations਍ഀ 5.9 North Day Lot਍ഀ While the North Day Lot is a privately own parcel of land, consideration਍ഀ should be given by the owner and the Town to including transportation਍ഀ related uses on the ground floor. Ideally the uses to be considered for the਍ഀ site should include skier drop-off, local and regional transit, local and਍ഀ regional private shuttles, and charter bus drop-off and pick-up (see figure਍ഀ 5-13). By relocating these functions from their existing locations to easily਍ഀ accessible locations, this would improve the quality of vehicular and਍ഀ pedestrian circulation in Lionshead and create a significant new਍ഀ pedestrian portal into the center of the Lionshead retail mall. Based upon਍ഀ the results of the traffic study (see appendix A), the dispersed਍ഀ transportation facilities may include:਍ഀ a. Skier drop-off. Nine spaces are recommended at a਍ഀ minimum, but more should be built if possible to਍ഀ accommodate other pro-gram elements,਍ഀ b. Town of Vail transit: Two bus spaces are recommended to਍ഀ accommodate the West Vail transit loop and the possibility for਍ഀ an eastbound in-town shuttle stop.਍ഀ c. Regional transit: One bus space is recommended਍ഀ d. Charter buses: Three to four bus spaces are recommended.਍ഀ e. Local and regional shuttles: Four shuttle van spaces are਍ഀ recommended at a minimum.਍ഀ It should be noted that the North Day Lot is a small parcel of land and that਍ഀ the location and shape of this parcel may not allow for all of the uses਍ഀ identified above without having significant implications to traffic circulation਍ഀ patterns and the owners ability to develop the site with a quality਍ഀ development as allowed under zoning for the property (the site is਍ഀ considered one development site for the purposes of zoning). There਍ഀ needs to be a balance between the development goals for the property਍ഀ and the impact of public uses on those goals. In order to meet the਍ഀ obligations of agreements regarding the Arrabelle project (core site), at a਍ഀ minimum skier drop off must occur on this site. As discussed below,਍ഀ the Lionshead parking structure and West Lionshead also provide਍ഀ opportunities for some of the transportation functions identified above.਍ഀ Given the impacts of a public transportation use and to maximize the਍ഀ opportunities for employee housing on the property, development਍ഀ standards such as site coverage, landscape area, north side setbacks,਍ഀ and building height may be adjusted to afford more flexibility to the਍ഀ property owner (see section 4.9.4.3) and approved by the Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission.਍ഀ In order to create more efficiency with the site development and to਍ഀ mitigate for the presence of a public transportation facility on private਍ഀ property, the Town may allow for encroachment of uses on the parcel਍ഀ of land owned by the Town on the north side of the north day lot.਍ഀ This encroachment may also help to mitigate impacts to adjacent਍ഀ 10਍ഀ properties to the south by maintaining adequate setbacks. There may be਍ഀ CO a need to move or enhance the pedestrian bridge abutment and access਍ഀ as part of the transportation facility.਍ഀ A critical consideration in the planning and design of this facility will be its਍ഀ impact on the adjacent Landmark Tower and Townhomes and the਍ഀ Westwind depicted in figure 5-13a, a linear building, screen, and/or਍ഀ landscape buffer is recommended at the southern edge of the site to਍ഀ screen the lower levels of the Landmark properties from the਍ഀ transportation facility. If necessary to provide adequate buffering a wall or਍ഀ fence in excess of 6' could be considered. This screen could house a bus਍ഀ shelter and waiting area, an information center, public restrooms, a small਍ഀ food and beverage operation, and an elevator core to the pedestrian mall਍ഀ level for ADA access needs. To the east, earthwork, landscaping, and/ or਍ഀ other screening measures should be considered to buffer the Westwind.਍ഀ The dispersed transportation facility may be covered by employee਍ഀ housing or other uses contemplated by the Lionshead Mixed Use Zoning਍ഀ -1 and any exemptions/deviations discussed herein. Specifically, the਍ഀ design of the transportation center should address all impacts: visual,਍ഀ security, sound, and smell that may affect adjacent properties. Both the਍ഀ Westwind and the Landmark should be closely involved in the transit਍ഀ center planning and design process.਍ഀ Since the adoption of the Lionshead Master Redevelopment Plan, plans਍ഀ were developed to locate a Transit Center at the North Day Lot.਍ഀ Integrating the number of uses mentioned above and addressing the਍ഀ neighborhood concerns regarding a transit center prompted the Town of਍ഀ Vail to evaluate alternative locations for a transit center.਍ഀ Alternative locations include:਍ഀ West Lionshead਍ഀ Lionshead Parking Structure਍ഀ North Day Lot਍ഀ In 2006, the Town of Vail initiated an update of the Vail Transportation਍ഀ Master Plan. In addition, the Town initiated a development competition਍ഀ for the Lionshead Parking Structure which would include a transit facility.਍ഀ It is recommended that the Transportation Master Plan update along with਍ഀ the conclusion of the Lionshead Parking Structure RFP process provide਍ഀ direction on the ultimate location for a Lionshead Transit Facility.਍ഀ Vail Land Use Plan਍ഀ The goals articulated in the plan reflect the desires of the citizenry. The goal਍ഀ statements that were developed reflect a general consensus of the comments਍ഀ shared at public meetings. The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to਍ഀ be used as the Town's adopted policy guidelines in the review process for new਍ഀ development proposals.਍ഀ According to the Official Town of Vail Land Use Plan map, the applicant's਍ഀ proposed redevelopment site is located with the "Lionshead Redevelopment਍ഀ Master Plan" land use category. Pursuant to the Plan, the "Lionshead਍ഀ Redevelopment Master Plan" land use category description,਍ഀ "Included in this category are those properties which are identified -as਍ഀ being included in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan boundaries.਍ഀ Properties located within this land use category shall be encouraged to਍ഀ redevelop, per the Master Plan recommendations, as it has been found਍ഀ that it is necessary in order for Vail to remain a competitive four-season਍ഀ resort. Uses and activities for these areas are intended to encourage a਍ഀ safe, convenient and an aesthetically-pleasing guest experience. The਍ഀ range of uses and activities appropriate in the Lionshead Redevelopment਍ഀ Master Plan (LRMP) land use category may include skier and resort਍ഀ services, ski lifts, ski trails, base facilities, public restrooms, ticket sales,਍ഀ clubs, public plazas, open spaces, parking and loading/delivery਍ഀ facilities/structures, public utilities, residential, lodges, accommodation਍ഀ units, deed restricted employee housing, retail businesses, professional਍ഀ and business offices, personal services, and restaurant uses."਍ഀ VI.਍ഀ ZONING ANALYSIS਍ഀ Address/Legal Description: 600 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail਍ഀ Lionshead Filing 3਍ഀ Parcel Size: 1.09 acre (47,480.4 sq. ft.)਍ഀ Zoning: Lionshead Mixed Use 1਍ഀ Land Use Designation: Linshead Redevelopment Master Plan਍ഀ Development Standard਍ഀ Allowed਍ഀ Existing਍ഀ Proposed਍ഀ Lot Area:਍ഀ 10,000 sq. ft.਍ഀ 47,480.4 sq. ft.਍ഀ 47,480.4 sq. ft.਍ഀ Setbacks All Sides: 10 ft. NA North - 30 ft.਍ഀ East- 11 ft.਍ഀ West- 11 ft.਍ഀ South- 16 ft.਍ഀ Building Height: 82.5 ft. max NA 70.8 ft. max਍ഀ 71 ft. avg. NA avg.਍ഀ Density: DUs (35/ac.) - 38 NA NA਍ഀ EHUs (unlimited) NA 32 units਍ഀ GRFA: 118,701 sq. ft. NA NA਍ഀ Site Coverage: 33,236 sq. ft. NA 13,675 sq. ft.਍ഀ (70%) (28.8%)਍ഀ Landscape Area: 9,496 sq. ft. (20%) NA 18,544 sq. ft. (39%)਍ഀ 12਍ഀ Parking: 1.4/EHU 105 spaces 40 EHUs਍ഀ (27 enclosed 67.5)਍ഀ 9 skier drop-off਍ഀ Loading 1 berth NA 1 berths਍ഀ VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING਍ഀ Land Use਍ഀ Zoning਍ഀ North:਍ഀ Interstate਍ഀ NA਍ഀ South:਍ഀ Residential਍ഀ Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District਍ഀ East:਍ഀ Residential਍ഀ Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District਍ഀ West:਍ഀ Residential਍ഀ Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District਍ഀ VIII. CRITERIA਍ഀ Maior Exterior Alteration਍ഀ Section 12-7H-8, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, outlines the review਍ഀ criteria for major exterior alteration applications proposed within the Lionshead਍ഀ Mixed Use 1 (LMU-1) zone district. According to Section 12-71-1-8, Vail Town਍ഀ Code, a major exterior alteration shall be reviewed for compliance with the਍ഀ following criteria:਍ഀ That the proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the਍ഀ purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district;਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ The purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district are stated in਍ഀ Section 12-7H-1, Purpose, Vail Town Code. As stated, the Lionshead਍ഀ Mixed Use 1 zone district is intended to provide sites within the area of਍ഀ Lionshead for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, hotels, fractional fee਍ഀ clubs, restaurants, skier services, commercial/retail establishments, and਍ഀ employee housing. The development standards prescribed for the district਍ഀ were established to provide incentives for development in accordance਍ഀ with the goals and objectives of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master਍ഀ Plan. In reviewing the proposed North Day Lot employee housing and਍ഀ skier drop-off plan for compliance with the expressed purposes of the਍ഀ Lionshead Mixed Use-1 zone district, staff finds that the major exterior਍ഀ alteration application complies with the intent of the zone district. The਍ഀ applicant is proposing to develop 34 Type III employee housing units for a਍ഀ total of 120 beds and a 9 space skier drop-off facility, which are permitted਍ഀ under Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zoning.਍ഀ Staff believes this proposed North Day Lot development complies with਍ഀ this criterion.਍ഀ 13਍ഀ 2. That the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the਍ഀ Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan;਍ഀ Staff response:਍ഀ Staff has performed a review of the proposed North Day Lot for਍ഀ compliance with the development requirements of the Lionshead Mixed਍ഀ Use-1 district and Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. In Section VI਍ഀ of this memorandum staff performed a zoning analysis of the project with਍ഀ regards to the development parameters of the Lionshead Mixed Use-1਍ഀ district. Within this analysis staff determined that the project is in਍ഀ compliance with the development parameters for setbacks, height,਍ഀ density, GRFA, site coverage, and landscape area.਍ഀ Furthermore, staff has performed a review of the Lionshead਍ഀ Redevelopment Master Plan and found the plan to be in compliance with਍ഀ the site specific recommendations for the North Day Lot. Portions of the਍ഀ Master Plan relative to this request have been provided in Section V of਍ഀ this memorandum. Staff has also performed a review of the project with਍ഀ regard to Chapter 8, Architectural Design Guidelines, which identifies਍ഀ requirements for vertical and horizontal fagade stepping, establishment of਍ഀ hierarchy of materials, height, etc. Staff has found that the proposed਍ഀ structure is 70.8 feet in height with no flat roofs, and has articulated਍ഀ facades which meet the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements.਍ഀ In addition, there is a clear base, middle, and upper segmentation to the਍ഀ structure. The Design Review Board will be reviewing the proposal for਍ഀ compliance with the Master Plan with regard to the detailing, fenestration,਍ഀ material selection and application.਍ഀ Staff believes this proposed North Day Lot development complies with਍ഀ this criterion.਍ഀ 3. That the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative਍ഀ effect on the character of the neighborhood; and,਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ Staff has reviewed the proposed North Day Lot major exterior alteration਍ഀ application and found that the proposed bulk, mass, and height of the਍ഀ structure, comply with the development parameters enumerated within਍ഀ the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district. The development as proposed਍ഀ is developed at a scale and location on the site which was selected to਍ഀ minimize the impacts and concerns expressed by the Landmark and਍ഀ Westwind projects. Staff and the applicant have worked diligently through਍ഀ the process to hear and address as many concerns of the neighboring਍ഀ properties as possible. Specifically items which have been included਍ഀ within the project are building location on the site, heating of the paved਍ഀ areas to reduce impacts of snow plow activities, and incorporation of a਍ഀ barrier on the Landmark property line to address directing of skier drop-off਍ഀ patrons and residents of the proposed project to the appropriate਍ഀ destinations (Design Review Board will address the appropriateness and਍ഀ design of the proposed barrier).਍ഀ 14਍ഀ Staff does not believe there are any significant negative effects on the਍ഀ character of the neighborhood, therefore the proposal is in compliance਍ഀ with this criterion.਍ഀ 4. That the proposal substantially complies with other applicable਍ഀ elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ Staff has reviewed the proposed North Day Lot major exterior alteration਍ഀ application and found that the proposal impacts the following applicable਍ഀ elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Upon review of the Plan, staff਍ഀ has determined that the following elements of the Plan apply:਍ഀ Transportation Master Plan (adopted 1993)਍ഀ Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan (adopted 1998)਍ഀ Vail Land use Plan (adopted 1986)਍ഀ With regard to the Transportation Master Plan the applicant provided the਍ഀ Public Works Department with a traffic study and roadway designs which਍ഀ have been reviewed and addressed by the Town Engineer and have been਍ഀ found to be correct and in compliance.਍ഀ Overall, staff believes that the applicant has proven by a preponderance of਍ഀ the evidence that the proposed amended major exterior alteration is in਍ഀ compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use-1 zone district,਍ഀ that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead਍ഀ Redevelopment Master Plan as provided in Section V of this memorandum਍ഀ and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect਍ഀ on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal complies with਍ഀ the Vail Land Use Plan designation of the site as Lionshead਍ഀ Redevelopment Master Plan.਍ഀ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the਍ഀ major exterior alteration application, the Commission shall make the following਍ഀ finding as part of the motion:਍ഀ "Pursuant to Section 12-7H-8, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, the਍ഀ applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence before the਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board਍ഀ that the proposed major exterior alteration is in compliance with the਍ഀ purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district, that the proposal is਍ഀ consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead Redevelopment਍ഀ Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant਍ഀ negative effect on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal਍ഀ substantially complies with other applicable elements of the Vail਍ഀ Comprehensive Plan."਍ഀ 15਍ഀ Off Street Parking Requirement Reduction਍ഀ Section 12-10-20, Special Review Provisions, Vail Town Code, outlines the਍ഀ review criteria for requesting a reduction in the required off street parking for a਍ഀ development. According to Section 12-10-20, Vail Town Code, a reduction to the਍ഀ required off-street parking requirement shall be reviewed for compliance with the਍ഀ following criteria:਍ഀ That parking demand will be less than the requirements identified in਍ഀ Section 12-10-10 of this Chapter; and਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ The parking requirement for the 32 employee housing units proposed is਍ഀ 1.4 spaces per unit. This results in a requirement of 44.8 parking spaces਍ഀ for the site. The applicant is requesting that the required parking for the਍ഀ proposed development be reduced to 40 parking spaces of which 27਍ഀ would be enclosed within the lowest level of the structure.਍ഀ The Town has reviewed several employee housing developments and਍ഀ developments which contain employee housing and determined that there਍ഀ are instances where a reduction in parking is warranted. The proposed਍ഀ project will be owned and operated by Vail Resorts and occupied by਍ഀ employees working on the mountain. It is anticipated that the majority of਍ഀ the occupants will be seasonal workers whom will not need a vehicle to਍ഀ travel to their place of work. It is furthermore anticipated that vail Resorts਍ഀ will offer occupancy of these units to employees who come without a car਍ഀ first as they do in other projects they operate.਍ഀ Section 4.9.4.3c, Parking, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, states਍ഀ the following which identifies the possible benefits of reducing the parking਍ഀ on the North Day Lot:਍ഀ It may be appropriate to reduce the parking requirements for਍ഀ employee housing at this location given the sites proximity to਍ഀ transportation facilities, jobs, and pedestrian routes.਍ഀ Staff believes the proposal to reduce the required parking by 4.8 spaces਍ഀ meets this criterion.਍ഀ 2. The probable long term use of the building or structure, based on its਍ഀ design will not generate additional parking demand; and਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ The proposed employee housing on the North Day Lot is comprised of 28਍ഀ four-bedroom and 4 three-bedroom dormitory style units. These unit਍ഀ sizes result in an average of 281 square feet per employee in the four਍ഀ bedroom units and 316 square feet in the three bedroom units. It has਍ഀ been the experience of the Town that units of this configuration and in a਍ഀ location with great proximity to the work generator require fewer parking਍ഀ spaces. Furthermore, there will be deed restrictions placed upon each਍ഀ 16਍ഀ unit within this development which will limit the ability to change the use਍ഀ and occupancy over time without direct involvement with the Town.਍ഀ Staff believes that the ownership, unit configuration, and recorded deed਍ഀ restrictions will result in the long term use of the structure as proposed਍ഀ currently which results in fewer need parking spaces.਍ഀ 3. The use or activity is part of a demonstrated permanent program਍ഀ (including, but not limited to, "rideshare" programs, shuttle service,਍ഀ or staggered work shifts) intended to reduce parking demand that਍ഀ has been incorporated into the project's final approved development਍ഀ plan: and਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ While the proposal does not included any managed solutions as identified਍ഀ in the above criterion, the applicant is proposing to operate the occupancy਍ഀ of these units as they do in other development they operate which give਍ഀ priority to those occupants that do not have a car. Furthermore, there are਍ഀ on-site laundry services which further reduce the need for transit needs.਍ഀ Staff believes the proposal complies with this criterion.਍ഀ 4. Proximity or availability of alternative modes of transportation਍ഀ (including, but not limited to, public transit or shuttle services) is਍ഀ significant and integral to the nature of the uses or business਍ഀ activity.਍ഀ Staff Response:਍ഀ The proposed North Day Lot employee housing development is on the਍ഀ periphery of the Lionshead retail core which has access to numerous਍ഀ services and bus lines. There are bus stops at Concert Hall plaza and on਍ഀ East Lionshead Circle which are within walking distance of the਍ഀ development. These bus stops integrate into the larger public transit਍ഀ system in the Town and the County.਍ഀ Staff believes there is access to alternative modes of transportation that਍ഀ warrant a reduction in 4.8 parking spaces for the North day Lot employee਍ഀ housing development.਍ഀ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the਍ഀ reduction to the required off street parking application, the Commission shall਍ഀ make the following finding as part of the motion:਍ഀ "Pursuant to Section 12-10-20, Special Review Provisions, Vail Town਍ഀ Code, the applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence਍ഀ before the Planning and Environmental Commission that the proposed਍ഀ project will create a parking demand which is less than the requirements਍ഀ identified in Section 12-10-10 of this Chapter, the probable long term use਍ഀ of the building or structure, based on its design will not generate additional਍ഀ parking demand, the use or activity is part of a demonstrated permanent਍ഀ 17਍ഀ program intended to reduce parking demand that has been incorporated਍ഀ into the project's final approved development plan, and the proximity or਍ഀ availability of alternative modes of transportation is significant and integral਍ഀ to the nature of the uses or business activity."਍ഀ IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION਍ഀ The Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, the request for final਍ഀ review of an amended major exterior alteration, pursuant to Section 12-7H-7,਍ഀ Major Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, and a reduction in਍ഀ the required off street parking pursuant to Section 12-10-20, Special Review਍ഀ Provisions, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the North Day Lot਍ഀ to include a 32 unit employee housing project, 40 parking spaces, and 9 public਍ഀ skier drop off spaces, located at 600 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 1, Block਍ഀ 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Staff's਍ഀ recommendation is based upon the review of the major exterior alteration review਍ഀ and off street parking reduction criteria outlined in Section VIII of this਍ഀ memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearing.਍ഀ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the਍ഀ major exterior alteration and off street and parking reduction recommended; Staff਍ഀ recommends that the Commission makes the following finding as part of the਍ഀ motion and findings:਍ഀ "Pursuant to Section 12-7H-8, Compliance Burden, Vail Town Code, the਍ഀ applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence before the਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission that the proposed major exterior਍ഀ alteration is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead Mixed Use-਍ഀ 1 zone district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of਍ഀ the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not਍ഀ otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of the਍ഀ neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other਍ഀ applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.਍ഀ Pursuant to Section 12-10-20, Special Review Provisions, Vail Town਍ഀ Code, the applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence਍ഀ before the Planning and Environmental Commission that the proposed਍ഀ project will create a parking demand which is less than the requirements਍ഀ identified in Section 12-10-10 of this Chapter, the probable long term use਍ഀ of the building or structure, based on its design will not generate additional਍ഀ parking demand, the use or activity is part of a demonstrated permanent਍ഀ program intended to reduce parking demand that has been incorporated਍ഀ into the project's final approved development plan, and the proximity or਍ഀ availability of alternative modes of transportation is significant and integral਍ഀ to the nature of the uses or business activity."਍ഀ Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve the਍ഀ major exterior alteration and off street parking reduction as submitted by the਍ഀ applicant, staff recommends that the following conditions be placed on the਍ഀ approval:਍ഀ 18਍ഀ For Design Review਍ഀ 1) That the Developer receives final review and approval of the proposed਍ഀ development plan by the Town of Vail Design Review Board, prior to਍ഀ making an application for the issuance of a building permit.਍ഀ Prior to Submitting for Buildinq Permits਍ഀ 2) That the Developer submits a complete set of civil engineered drawings of਍ഀ the Approved Development Plans including the required off site਍ഀ improvements, to the Town of Vail Community Development Department਍ഀ for review and approval of the drawings, prior to making application for the਍ഀ issuance of a building permit for the North Day Lot improvements.਍ഀ 3) That the Developer shall provide a plan for review and approval by the਍ഀ appropriate reviewing authority, depending on the plan submitted, for਍ഀ temporary replacement of the 105 parking spaces that will not be available਍ഀ during construction of the North Day Lot employee housing project and਍ഀ prior to their permanent inclusion within the Ever Vail or some other਍ഀ project. The plan providing for 105 parking spaces shall be made for the਍ഀ entirety of the time period that parking is not available on the North Day਍ഀ Lot or in a permanent location such as Ever Vail. This plan shall be਍ഀ provided and approved prior to submittal of building permits.਍ഀ 4) The Developer shall enter into a revised employee housing agreement, in਍ഀ a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the dates by which਍ഀ building permits will be submitted and construction shall commence for the਍ഀ letter of credit currently posted as security for the project, which can be਍ഀ negotiated by the Town of Vail. This agreement shall be in place within 30਍ഀ days of approval of the major exterior alteration.਍ഀ 5) The Developer shall enter into a revised permanent skier drop-off਍ഀ agreement, in a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the dates਍ഀ by which building permits will be submitted and construction shall਍ഀ commence for the letter of credit currently posted as security for the਍ഀ project, which can be negotiated by the Town of Vail. This agreement਍ഀ shall be in place within 30 days of approval of the major exterior alteration.਍ഀ 6) The Developer shall provide the Town a construction schedule for the਍ഀ North Day Lot employee housing and permanent skier drop-off project for਍ഀ review and approval by the Town of Vail within 30 days of the approval of਍ഀ the major exterior alteration. Said schedule shall include but not be limited਍ഀ to identification of a building permit submittal date, a commencement of਍ഀ construction date, and a completion of construction/delivery date. This਍ഀ schedule shall be utilized in the review of conditions 4 and 5 included with਍ഀ this approval.਍ഀ 7) The Developer shall enter into a skier drop-off operation and maintenance਍ഀ agreement, in a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the਍ഀ deft, standards, responsibilities and procedures for the permanent skier drop-off਍ഀ facility on the North Day Lot, prior to submitting for building permits.਍ഀ 19਍ഀ 8) The Developer shall enter into a construction and continued operation਍ഀ agreement for improvements to be constructed in Tract C, Block 1, Vail਍ഀ Lionshead Filing 3, in a form satisfactory to the Town, prior to submitting਍ഀ for building permits.਍ഀ 9) The Developer shall submit a construction access easement for the work਍ഀ to be performed on the Town owned parcel in conjunction with the਍ഀ permanent skier drop-off, in a form satisfactory to the Town, to allow for਍ഀ construction activities on Town land, prior to submittal of a building permit.਍ഀ Prior to Reauestinq a Certificate of Occupanc਍ഀ 10) The Developer shall submit a permanent easement for the skier drop-off,਍ഀ in a form satisfactory to the Town, which establishes the extent, rights, and਍ഀ privileges associated with the permanent nine space skier drop-off facility,਍ഀ prior to requesting a certificate of occupancy.਍ഀ 11) The Developer shall submit a permanent'easement for the potential South਍ഀ Frontage Road access point into the site, in a form satisfactory to the਍ഀ Town, as depicted on Sheet C1.01 dated January 30, 2009, prior to਍ഀ requesting a certificate of occupancy.਍ഀ 12) The Developer shall submit a permanent cross-access easement for the਍ഀ use of a portion of Town land for circulation needs associated with the਍ഀ employee housing project, in a form satisfactory to the Town, prior to਍ഀ requesting a certificate of occupancy.਍ഀ 13) The Developer shall provide the Town with the legally executed and duly਍ഀ recorded Type III deed restrictions with the Eagle County Clerk &਍ഀ Recorder's Office for the 32 on-site employee housing units, prior to the਍ഀ issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project.਍ഀ X. ATTACHMENTS਍ഀ A. Copy of proposed plans dated February 4, 2009਍ഀ B. Document describing the project entitled North Day Lot Employee Housing &਍ഀ Skier Drop-Off dated revised January 30, 2009਍ഀ 20਍ഀ x਍ഀ Q,਍ഀ Attachment B਍ഀ VAIL਍ഀ Re-Submitted: November 10, 2008਍ഀ REVISED: January 30, 2009਍ഀ JA I i~ci਍ഀ Mawiello € Panning Group਍ഀ I. Table of Contents਍ഀ 1. Table of Contents 2਍ഀ II. Consultant Directory 3਍ഀ III. Introduction 4਍ഀ IV. Description of Proposal 6਍ഀ V. North Day Lot Timeline 7਍ഀ VI. Zoning and Parking Analysis 9਍ഀ VII. Criteria for Review of Malor Exterior Alteration 10਍ഀ VIII. Criteria for Review Parking Reduction 19਍ഀ IX. Adlacents 21਍ഀ 0਍ഀ •਍ഀ 2਍ഀ II. Consultant Directory਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company Alpine Engineering, Inc.਍ഀ Brandt Marott Kent Kriehn਍ഀ Tom Miller Jen Babcock਍ഀ 137 Benchmark Road Unit A9, Edwards Business Center਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620 Edwards, CO 81632਍ഀ P: 970.754.2528 P: 970.926.3373਍ഀ F: 970.754.2555 F: 970.926.3390਍ഀ bmarott@vailresorts.com Kriehn@alpinecivil.com਍ഀ OZ Architecture਍ഀ LandWorks Design, Inc.਍ഀ Will Hentschel਍ഀ Gary Worthley਍ഀ Eduardo Illanes਍ഀ 3457 Ringsby Court Unit 1 10਍ഀ 1820 Folsom Street਍ഀ Denver, CO 80216਍ഀ Boulder, Colorado 80302਍ഀ P: 303.443.4257਍ഀ P: 303.449.8900਍ഀ F: 303.433.4359਍ഀ F: 303.449.3886਍ഀ gorthley@londworksdesign.com਍ഀ whentschel@ozorch.com਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,਍ഀ Mauriello Planning Group਍ഀ Curtis D. Rowe, P.E., PTOE਍ഀ Dominic Mauriello਍ഀ Allison Kent਍ഀ Suite 1050਍ഀ 950 Seventeenth Street਍ഀ PO Box 1 127਍ഀ Denver, Colorado 80202਍ഀ 5601 A Wildridge Road਍ഀ P: 303.228.2300਍ഀ Avon, Colorado 81620਍ഀ F: 303.446.8678਍ഀ P: 970.748.0920਍ഀ cudis.rowe@kimley-horn.com਍ഀ F: 970.748.0377਍ഀ allison@mpgvoil.com਍ഀ 2਍ഀ 3਍ഀ III. Introduction਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company is submitting this application to allow for the development of Employee਍ഀ Housing on the property commonly referred to as the North Day Lot, located at 600 West lionshead Circle /਍ഀ Lot 1, Block 1, Vail lionshead Filing 3. We are requesting a review of a major exterior alteration, which the਍ഀ Town Code defines as follows:਍ഀ 72-7H-7• EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS.-਍ഀ A. Review Required The construction of a new building or the alteration of on existing building that is਍ഀ not a major exterior alteration as described in subsection B of this section shall be reviewed by the਍ഀ design review board in accordance with chapter I I of this title.਍ഀ B. Major Exterior Alteration: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing਍ഀ building which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units, fractional fee club units,਍ഀ timeshare units, any project which adds more than one thousand (7, 000) square feet of commercial਍ഀ floor area or common space, or any project which has substantial off site impacts has determined by਍ഀ the administrator) shall be reviewed by the planning and environmental commission as a major exterior਍ഀ alteration in accordance with this chapter and section 72-3-6 of this title. Any project which requires a਍ഀ conditional use permit shall also obtain approval of the planning and environmental commission in਍ഀ accordance with chapter 76 of this title. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be਍ഀ submitted in accordance with administrative schedules developed by the department of community਍ഀ development for planning and environmental commission and design review board review.਍ഀ While the construction of EHUs does not meet the definition of this section, staff has determined that there is the਍ഀ potential for off-site impacts as a result of employee housing, and have deemed it necessary to review the਍ഀ project as a major exterior alteration. No conditional use permits are required for this project.਍ഀ We are requesting approval of the following:਍ഀ • Major Exterior Alteration: to allow for 32 Type III employee housing units, totaling 1 24 employee਍ഀ beds (to fulfill the Arrabelle TCO requirement of 120 beds). The remainder is a credit to fulfill future਍ഀ Vail Resorts' requirements.਍ഀ Along with the Major Exterior Alteration, we are requesting approval of a reduction to the number of required਍ഀ parking spaces for the employee housing project, as provided for in Section 12-10-20: Special Review਍ഀ Provisions, Vail Town Code. This would allow for a reduction in the number of required parking spaces from਍ഀ 1 .4 per unit to 1 .25 per unit (44.8 spaces to 40 spaces).਍ഀ The North Day lot is a relatively small development site, consisting of only 1 .09 acres. The property is zoned਍ഀ lionshead Mixed Use - 1 and no mapped hazards exist on the site. In 1976, Vail Resorts deeded the਍ഀ adjacent property (.256 acres) that is now the terminus of the pedestrian overpass to the Town of Vail, further਍ഀ constraining the site. The North Day Lot has historically been used as a parking lot, consisting of 105 parking਍ഀ spaces. Displaced parking from development of the site will be located within the parking structure at Ever਍ഀ J਍ഀ 4਍ഀ Vail. The property is owned by Vail Resorts and parking has been pass-restricted to Vail Resorts employees. It਍ഀ is also adjacent to the terminus of the pedestrian overpass, which crosses 1-70 from Red Sandstone Elementary਍ഀ School.਍ഀ Based upon the agreement between the Town of Vail and Vail Resorts Development Company, the North Day਍ഀ Lot is fulfilling the employee housing requirements of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy of the Arrabelle.਍ഀ The requirements include providing the displaced employee beds from the demolition of the Sunbird, along਍ഀ with the employee housing requirements from the development of the Arrabelle - a total requirement of 120਍ഀ beds. There is also a requirement for Vail Resorts to provide skier drop-off that was eliminated from Lionshead਍ഀ Place as part of the redevelopment of the core site. A total of 9 skier drop-off spaces have been provided.਍ഀ 0਍ഀ r਍ഀ Existing conditions at the North Day Lot (winfer 2008).਍ഀ r਍ഀ Skier Drop-Off signoge (winter 2009)਍ഀ Exisling Conditions at the North Day Lot (winter 2009)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ IV. Description of Proposal ,3਍ഀ The project consists of the 32 employee housing units, totaling 124 beds. As the current proposal is for਍ഀ employee housing units and the agreement pre-dated the Town's adoption of housing regulations, the project਍ഀ is exempt from both Chapter 23, Commercial Linkage, and Chapter 24, Inclusionary Zoning.਍ഀ The requirement from the development of the core site into Arrabelle requires the replacement of 100਍ഀ employee beds and the provision of 20 beds generated by the Arrabelle project. The measurement of 120਍ഀ beds is based on the previous method of calculating employee housing requirements. Vail Resorts is਍ഀ proposing 4-bedroom and 3-bedroom units, which fall under the definition of a dormitory unit, as defined by਍ഀ Chapter 23, Vail Town Code:਍ഀ DORMITORY UNIT.- A type of employee housing unit which houses not more than five (5) persons and਍ഀ includes common kitchen facilities, a common bathroom, and a minimum of two hundred LlNz (250਍ഀ square feet of GRFA for each person occupying the unit.਍ഀ This definition was created for exactly the type of housing project being provided. In addition, the Chapter਍ഀ 13, Employee Housing further describes a Type III employee housing unit, limiting it in size to the following:਍ഀ A. Dwelling Unit.-਍ഀ 300 square feet minimum.਍ഀ 1, 200 square feet maximum.਍ഀ 8. Dormitory Unit-਍ഀ A type of FHU which houses not more than 5 persons and includes common kitchen facilities,਍ഀ a common bathroom, and a minimum of 200 square feet of GRFA for each person਍ഀ (NOTE: the definitions of a Type III Employee Housing Unit and the requirements of the Chapter 23, Commercial਍ഀ Linkage are inconsistent)਍ഀ The proposed unit mix at the North Day Lot is as follows:਍ഀ Unit Type਍ഀ No. of units਍ഀ No. of਍ഀ Sq. ft. per unit਍ഀ Total Sq. ft.਍ഀ No. of employees਍ഀ Sq. Ft. per਍ഀ Bedrooms਍ഀ (based on # of beds਍ഀ employee਍ഀ ovided)਍ഀ 4-bedroom਍ഀ 28਍ഀ 112਍ഀ 1,125਍ഀ 31,500਍ഀ 112਍ഀ 281.25਍ഀ 3-bedroom਍ഀ 4਍ഀ 12਍ഀ 948਍ഀ 3,792਍ഀ 12਍ഀ 316਍ഀ 6਍ഀ 4 BR UNIT - 1,118 SF਍ഀ 3 BR UNIT - 948 SF਍ഀ V. North Day Lot Timeline਍ഀ The proposal for employee housing on the North Day lot was originally reviewed by the Planning and਍ഀ Environmental Commission approximately a year ago. Since that time, the proposal on the North Day Lot has਍ഀ continued to evolve in other forums. A brief description of the timeline provides the background for how the਍ഀ plans have progressed into the current proposal:਍ഀ • December 11, 2007, amendment to Arrabelle agreement requires 120 beds to be located on the਍ഀ North Day Lot.਍ഀ ~I਍ഀ • February 21, 2008, VR submits application to the Town of Vail with employee housing, transit center,਍ഀ and future development site for a hotel. PEC recommends denial based on future development site.਍ഀ ~xcwc਍ഀ . Y•p.d਍ഀ i਍ഀ t.਍ഀ v਍ഀ April 22, 2008, VR resubmits application with employee housing and transit center only. TOV enters਍ഀ into agreement with VR to explore options for the transit center on the site. Over next 5 months, 8਍ഀ options explored, 4 developed for review.਍ഀ • September 16, 2008, Town Council decides to not pursue a transit center, but to explore options to਍ഀ put shuttles on the North Day Lot.਍ഀ • October 21, 2008, Town Council decides not to include shuttles. Directs applicant to propose਍ഀ employee housing and skier drop-off only.਍ഀ 7਍ഀ • November 10, 2008, VR submits plan with employee housing and skier drop-off on the east. No਍ഀ improvements required on TOV property and exceeds parking requirements. TOV staff indicates਍ഀ concern with vehicular circulations for the skier drop-off spaces.਍ഀ • December 23, 2008, VR submits plans with employee housing and skier drop-off on the west, based਍ഀ on input from TOV staff. No improvements required on TOV property and exceeds parking਍ഀ requirements. Staff indicates concern with requiring skier drop-off vehicles to back up and requests a਍ഀ one-way circulation pattern.਍ഀ January 19, 2009, VR re-submits plans with employee housing and skier drop-off on the west. Allows਍ഀ for one-way vehicular circulation for skier drop-off spaces. Turnaround located partially on TOV਍ഀ property and eliminates excess parking.਍ഀ , i਍ഀ J਍ഀ 8਍ഀ 9 VI. Zoning and Parking Analysis਍ഀ Below is a zoning analysis of the North Day Lot. This analysis is based on the 1 .09 acre North Day lot site.਍ഀ The site is currently zoned Lionshead Mixed Use - 1 . There is a 30 ft. utility easement along the south਍ഀ property line along the South Frontage Road.਍ഀ Lot Size: 1 .09 acres਍ഀ 47 465 sn ft਍ഀ Standard਍ഀ Allowed਍ഀ Proposed਍ഀ Setbacks - North਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ South਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ 30 ft.਍ഀ East਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ West਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ 10 ft.਍ഀ Height਍ഀ Max਍ഀ 82.5 ft.਍ഀ 70.83 ft.਍ഀ Avero e਍ഀ 71 ft.਍ഀ NA਍ഀ Density਍ഀ 38.15 dwelling units਍ഀ (35 units per acre)਍ഀ EHUs do not count towards density਍ഀ GRFA਍ഀ 118,662 sq. ft.਍ഀ (250% of site area)਍ഀ EHUs do not count towards GRFA਍ഀ Site Coverage਍ഀ 33,225 sq. ft.਍ഀ (70% of site area)਍ഀ 13,675 sq. ft.਍ഀ (28.8% of site area)਍ഀ Landscape Area਍ഀ Min of 9,493 sq. ft.਍ഀ (20% of site area)਍ഀ 20% of landscape area may be਍ഀ hardsca e਍ഀ 18,544 sq, ft.਍ഀ (39%)਍ഀ 12,626 sq. ft. softscape਍ഀ 5,918 s q. ft. hardsca e਍ഀ Loading਍ഀ 1 berth਍ഀ 1 berth਍ഀ Parking਍ഀ 1 .4 per unit਍ഀ 45 spaces਍ഀ (min of 23 spaces enclosed)਍ഀ 9 spaces for skier drop-off਍ഀ 1 .25 per unit਍ഀ 40 spaces for EHUs (27 enclosed)਍ഀ 9 spaces for skier drop-off਍ഀ 49 spaces total਍ഀ Sym~ _਍ഀ i਍ഀ `I਍ഀ 9਍ഀ North Day lol Site Plan - Proposed਍ഀ VII. Criteria for Review of Major Exterior Alteration j਍ഀ The Lionshead Mixed Use-1 Zone District does not supply criteria for review as in the case of a Special਍ഀ Development District. However, it does offer a description of the "compliance burden".਍ഀ 12-7H-8: COMPLIANCE BURDEN:਍ഀ It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the਍ഀ planning and environmental commission and the design review board that the proposed exterior਍ഀ alteration or new development is in compliance with the purposes of the Lionshead mixed use 1਍ഀ district, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead redevelopment master਍ഀ plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant negative effect on the character of਍ഀ the neighborhood, and that the proposal substantially complies with other applicable elements of the਍ഀ Vail comprehensive plan.਍ഀ A. Purpose of the LMU-1 Zone District਍ഀ The Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district was created in 1999, as the implementation phase of the Lionshead਍ഀ Redevelopment Master Plan. Following the creation of the zone district, the Town of Vail rezoned all਍ഀ Lionshead properties from the existing zoning to LMU-1. It intended to create incentives for properties to਍ഀ redevelop. The purpose of the LMU-1 zone district is as follows:਍ഀ The Lionshead mixed use 1 district is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family dwellings, lodges,਍ഀ hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants, offices, skier services, and commercial਍ഀ establishments in a clustered, unified development. [ionshead mixed use 1 district, in accordance with the਍ഀ Lionshead redevelopment master plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities਍ഀ appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the zone਍ഀ district by establishing appropriate site development standards. This zone district is meant to encourage and਍ഀ provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead redevelopment master plan.਍ഀ This zone dsInct was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop. The ultimate goal਍ഀ of these incentives is to create an economically vibrant lodging, housing, and commercial core area. The਍ഀ incentives in this zone district include increases in allowable gross residential floor area, building height, and਍ഀ density over the previously established zoning in the Uonshead redevelopment master plan study area. The਍ഀ primary goal of the incentives is to create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment਍ഀ consistent with the Lionshead redevelopment master plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help finance਍ഀ public off site improvements adjacent to redevelopment prolects. With any development/redevelopment਍ഀ proposal taking advantage of the incentives created herein, the following amenities will be evaluoted-਍ഀ streetscope improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway਍ഀ improvements, and similar improvements.਍ഀ The North Day Lot remains one of the few undeveloped properties in Lionshead. Currently, it serves as a਍ഀ parking lot for VR employees and includes 105 surface parking spaces. The property is greatly underutilized.਍ഀ Development of the site under the regulations of the Lionshead Mixed Use - 1 zone district will ensure that the਍ഀ site becomes an amenity to the neighborhood and the Town of Vail. There will be 32 Type III employee਍ഀ housing units. Type III EHUs are a permitted use in the Lionshead Mixed Use-1 zone district and do not count਍ഀ towards density or towards GRFA.਍ഀ 10਍ഀ C, B. Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Compliance਍ഀ The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan was adopted by the Town of Vail on December 15, 1998. It is a਍ഀ guide for property owners proposing to undertake development or redevelopment of their properties and਍ഀ municipal officials responsible for planning public improvements. The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan਍ഀ (LRMP) sets out recommendations for the entire Lionshead area, provides detailed plan recommendations for਍ഀ specific areas, and outlines site design and architectural design guidelines, and provides specific development਍ഀ standards that are implemented through the Lionshead Mixed Use-1 zone district.਍ഀ 3.9.4 Vail Associates Employee Parking਍ഀ Vail Associates currently utilizes two large surface parking lots within the study area for its employee਍ഀ parking needs. The North Day Lot (see figure 3-15), with a capacity of approximately 705 cars is਍ഀ located behind the Landmark tower and is the site proposed for a transportation facility, employee਍ഀ housing, and other uses contemplated under the zoning on the property (LM-1). The west day lot,਍ഀ located lust west of the Marriott parking structure, has an approximate capacity of 760 cars and਍ഀ represents a significant development opportunity. Parking displaced by redevelopment of these sites਍ഀ must be replaced within the Lionshead study area to satisfy the ground rule requiring no net loss of਍ഀ parking. The displaced parking will be provided in West Lionshead within a parking structure਍ഀ included as part of the EverVail project.਍ഀ As indicated by this policy, replacement parking for the parking spaces existing on the North Day Lot will be਍ഀ provided in the Ever Vail project, above and beyond the parking required for the Ever Vail project. In addition਍ഀ to the 9 skier drop-off spaces, there are a total of 40 parking spaces for the employee housing units proposed਍ഀ at the North Day Lot.਍ഀ It should be noted that the bulk of the original users of the North Day Lot were Vail Resorts employees working਍ഀ in offices located on the Core Site and parking for the Sunbird Lodge employee housing, which no longer਍ഀ exist.਍ഀ 4.5.2.1 Relocate the Regional Transit Stop਍ഀ It is recommended that the Lionshead regional transit stop, currently located at the Lionshead Place cut਍ഀ de sac, be relocated to the proposed North Day Lot, the Lionshead parking structure, and West਍ഀ Lionshead This will provide a Lionshead connection between the regional transit system and the Town਍ഀ of Vail transit system. In addition, visitors and employees coming to Lionshead by regional bus will਍ഀ arrive at a defined portal instead of the current back door" on Lionshead Place. Finally, this will਍ഀ remove the large regional buses from West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. It may be possible਍ഀ to locate elements of a regional transit stop in the West Lionshead area in conjunction with a new ski਍ഀ Lift and parking facility However, given its location on the periphery of Lionshead, this area may not਍ഀ be the most viable location for a regional transit stop. Notwithstanding the above, facilities for skier਍ഀ drop-off, private shuttle vans and Town of Vail in-town buses should be included in the design of the ski਍ഀ Lift and parking facility. In 20061 the Town of Vail initiated an update of the Vail Transportation਍ഀ Master Plan. In addition, the Town initiated a development competition for the Lionshead Parking਍ഀ Structure redevelopment, which would include a transit facility. It is anticipated that the Transportation਍ഀ Master Plan update along with the conclusion of the Lionshead Parking Structure redevelopment਍ഀ process will provide direction on the ultimate location for a Lionshead Transit facility and/or the type਍ഀ of transit facilities that may be necessary in West Lionshead.਍ഀ 4.6.6 Creation o1 a New Transportation Hub on the North Day Lot਍ഀ A principal component of the Lionshead transportation and circulation network is the creation of਍ഀ dispersed transportation facilities in the Lionshead area. This facility will remove transit and service਍ഀ vehicles from other areas of Lionshead and create a major new entry point into the Lionshead਍ഀ pedestrian core. ALL or portions of these dispersed transportation facilities may be located on the਍ഀ North Day Lot, the Lionshead parking structure, or in West Lionshead. This concept is fully discussed in਍ഀ chapter five.਍ഀ On September 16, 2008, the Town Council voted to not include a transit center on the North Day Lot਍ഀ therefore determining that other locations for transit facilities were more appropriate including West Lionshead਍ഀ Circle, West Lionshead (Ever Vail), and the Lionshead Parking Structure. Per this Town Council vote and਍ഀ direction, no transit facilities are included on the North Day Lot. The proposed project conforms to the above਍ഀ policies.਍ഀ 4.9.4.3 Vail Associates Service Yard Holy Cross Site, Vail Professional Building, Cascade Crossing,਍ഀ North Day Lot, and the former gas station site਍ഀ All redevelopment in West Lionshead will need to conform to the Town's housing policies and਍ഀ requirements. In order to create activity and vibrancy in West Lionshead it is appropriate to include਍ഀ some dispersed employee housing opportunities for permanent local residents in proposed਍ഀ developments in the area consistent with these policies.਍ഀ Perhaps the most promising locations to replace the Sunbird affordable housing project and to conform਍ഀ to the Town's housing policies and requirements for new employee housing generation in Lionshead਍ഀ are the North Day Lot, Vail Associates service yard, and Holy Cross site. However, housing is not the਍ഀ only use these three properties will need to support. The North Day lot is considered to be the਍ഀ preferred location for a significant housing project in Lionshead to replace the Sunbird affordable਍ഀ housing protect and provide housing for new employee generation. The North Day lot may also need਍ഀ to accommodate a transit center on the ground level of the development site. Additionally, it may be਍ഀ necessary to develop a higher revenue-generating product on a portion of the Vail Associates service਍ഀ yard, Holy Cross, Vail Professional Building, and Cascade Crossing sites in order to defray the cost of਍ഀ road and infrastructure improvements.਍ഀ In planning the site, the following issues need to be considered. While it is important that buildings਍ഀ here be visually consistent with the overall character of Lionshead, the desire to maximize the housing਍ഀ potential may make appropriate the following deviations from standard development parameters.਍ഀ a. Density਍ഀ The site offers a unique opportunity to achieve significant density. It is recommended that the਍ഀ standards for density (units per acre) be increased at this location to allow for a greater number਍ഀ of employee housing units. While it is important that buildings here be visually consistent with਍ഀ the overall character of Lionshead, the desire to maximize the housing potential may make਍ഀ 12਍ഀ 9 appropriate the following deviations from standard development parameters.਍ഀ b. Building Height for Employee Housing਍ഀ It may be appropriate to allow for a greater overall building height than is otherwise allowed਍ഀ under the Lionshead Architectural Design Guidelines. Any increase in building height will need਍ഀ to be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Town of Vail, and any eventual building height਍ഀ will still need to be visually appropriate for this location.਍ഀ c. Parking਍ഀ 11 may be appropriate to reduce the parking requirements for employee housing at this location਍ഀ given the sites proximity to transportation facilities, jobs, and pedestrian routes. In਍ഀ consideration for reducing employee parking for the housing provided on this site, parking for਍ഀ other employees of the owner provided on this site should be considered. Excess parking may਍ഀ be used to satisfy the no net loss of parking policy or for future parking requirements of other਍ഀ development on the property.਍ഀ d. Site Coverage and Landscape Area and Setbacks਍ഀ Consideration should also be given to increasing site coverage and reducing setbacks and਍ഀ landscape area in order to maximize the amount of employee housing on the site and/or due਍ഀ to impacts associated with the development of a public transportation facility on the property.਍ഀ With any deviation to development standards prescribed in the master plan and zoning਍ഀ regulations, consideration of impacts should be afforded to the neighboring residential uses to਍ഀ the North Day Lot. Any design with such deviations will need to be sensitive to creating good਍ഀ 4W designs with mitigation measures such as heated sidewalks and well planned landscape਍ഀ materials. Additionally due to impacts from the Town's dispersed transportation center on਍ഀ neighboring residential uses, mitigation measures should be provided to buffer and screen਍ഀ residential uses.਍ഀ e. Encroachments on Town land਍ഀ The Town of Vail owns a small parcel of land on the north side of the north day lot which਍ഀ accommodates the pedestrian bridge over the interstate highway. This land was dedicated to਍ഀ the Town by Vail Associates in 1976. In order to allow for more efficient layout and਍ഀ development of employee housing on the site and/or the dispersed transportation facility, the਍ഀ Town should give consideration to allowing development of employee housing and/or਍ഀ transportation uses on this parcel of land as part of the development of the north day lot.਍ഀ On September 16, 2008, the Town Council voted to not include a transit center on the North Day Lot਍ഀ therefore determining that other locations for transit facilities were more appropriate including West Lionshead਍ഀ Circle, West Lionshead (Ever Vail), and the Lionshead Parking Structure. Per this Town Council vote and਍ഀ direction, no transit facilities are included on the North Day Lot.਍ഀ Consistent with this policy, the applicant is proposing to replace the employee beds of the Sunbird Lodge on਍ഀ the North Day Lot. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to provide the employee beds generated by the਍ഀ Arrabelle project on the North Day Lot. The employee housing project proposed for this site complies with the਍ഀ density, building height, parking, site coverage, landscape area, setbacks, and all other requirements of the਍ഀ 13਍ഀ Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone district without the need for variation. A parking reduction is being requested in਍ഀ accordance with Section 12-10-20 of the Vail Town Code. It should be noted that the policy suggests that਍ഀ parking requirements for employee housing on this site should be reduced based on it location with respect to਍ഀ jobs and public transportation. No encroachments for structures on Town land are being proposed with this਍ഀ project. However, the drive aisles associated with skier drop-off (a public facility) are located on Town਍ഀ property. The proposed project conforms to this policy.਍ഀ 5.9 North Day Lot਍ഀ While the North Day Lot is a privately own parcel of land, consideration should be given by the਍ഀ owner and the Town to including transportation related uses on the ground floor, Ideally the uses to be਍ഀ considered for the site should include skier drop-off, local and regional transit, local and regional਍ഀ private shuttles, and charter bus drop-off and pick-up (see figure 5-73). By relocating these functions਍ഀ from their existing locations to easily accessible locations, this would improve the quality of vehicular਍ഀ and pedestrion circulation in Lionshead and create a significant new pedestrian portal into the center਍ഀ of the Lionshead retail mall. Based upon the results of the traffic study (see appendix A), the dispersed਍ഀ transportation facilities may include:਍ഀ a. Skier drop-off Nine spaces are recommended at a minimum, but more਍ഀ should be built if possible to accommodate other program elements.਍ഀ b. Town of Vail transit.- Two bus spaces are recommended to accommodate਍ഀ the West Vcll transit loop and the possibility for an eastbound in-town਍ഀ shuttle stop.਍ഀ c. Regional transit: One bus space is recommended਍ഀ d. Charter buses: Three to four bus spaces are recommended਍ഀ e. Local and regional shuttles. four shuttle van spaces are recommended at਍ഀ a minimum.਍ഀ It should be noted that the North Day Lot is a small parcel of land and that the location and shape of਍ഀ this parcel may not allow for all of the uses identified above without having significant implications to਍ഀ traffic circulation patterns and the owners ability to develop the site with a quality development as਍ഀ allowed under zoning for the properly (the site is considered one development site for the purposes of਍ഀ zoning). There needs to be a balance belween the development goals for the property and the਍ഀ impact of public uses on those goals. In order to meet the obligations of agreements regarding the਍ഀ Arrabelle project (core site), at a minimum skier drop off must occur on this site. As discussed below,਍ഀ the lionshead parking structure and West Lionshead also provide opportunities for some of the਍ഀ transportation functions identified above.਍ഀ Given the impacts of a public transportation use and to maximize the opportunities for employee਍ഀ housing on the property, development standards such as site coverage, landscape area, north side਍ഀ setbacks, and building height may be adlusled to afford more flexibility to the properly owner (see਍ഀ section 4.9.4.3) and approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission.਍ഀ In order to create more efficiency with the site development and to mitigate for the presence of a਍ഀ public transportation facility on private property, the Town may allow for encroachment of uses on the਍ഀ parcel of land owned by the Town on the north side of the north day lot. This encroachment may also਍ഀ 14਍ഀ help to mitigate impacts to adjacent properties to the south by maintaining adequate setbacks. There਍ഀ may be a need to move or enhance the pedestrian bridge abutment and access as part of the਍ഀ transportation facility.਍ഀ A critical consideration in the planning and design of this facility will be its impact on the adjacent਍ഀ landmark Tower and Townhomes and the Westwind depicted in figure 5-73a, a linear building,਍ഀ screen, and/or landscape buffer is recommended at the southern edge of the site to screen the lower਍ഀ levels of the landmark properties from the transportation facility. If necessary to provide adequate਍ഀ buffering a wall or fence in excess of 6' could be considered. This screen could house a bus shelter਍ഀ and waiting area, an information center, public restrooms, a small food and beverage operation, and਍ഀ an elevator core to the pedestrian mall level for ADA access needs. To the east, earthwork,਍ഀ landscaping, and/ or other screening measures should be considered to buffer the Westwind.਍ഀ The dispersed transportation facility may be covered by employee housing or other uses contemplated਍ഀ by the lionshead Mixed Use Zoning -I and any exemptions/deviations discussed herein. Specifically,਍ഀ the design of the transportation center should address all impacts. visual, security, sound, and smell਍ഀ that may affect ad acent properties. Both the Westwind and the Landmark should be closely involved਍ഀ in the transit center planning and design process.਍ഀ Since the adoption of the lionshead Master Redevelopment Plan, plans were developed to locate a਍ഀ Transit Center at the North Day Lot. Integrating the number of uses mentioned above and addressing਍ഀ the neighborhood concerns regarding a transit center prompted the Town of Vail to evaluate਍ഀ alternative locations for a transit center.਍ഀ Alternative locations include.਍ഀ • West lionshead਍ഀ • lionshead Parking Structure਍ഀ • North Day lot਍ഀ In 2006, the Town of Vail initiated an update of the Vail Transportation Master Plan. In addition, the਍ഀ Town initiated a development competition for the lionshead Parking Structure which would include a਍ഀ transit facility. It is recommended that the Transportation Master Plan update along with the conclusion਍ഀ of the lionshead Parking Structure RFP process provide direction on the ultimate location for a਍ഀ lionshead Transit Facility.਍ഀ On September 16, 2008, the Town Council voted to not include a transit center on the North Day lot਍ഀ therefore determining that other locations for transit facilities were more appropriate including West lionshead਍ഀ Circle, West lionshead (Ever Vail), and the Lionshead Parking Structure. Per this Town Council vote and਍ഀ direction, no transit facilities are included on the North Day Lot. The proposed project includes a public skier਍ഀ drop-off facility with 9 parking spaces. This skier drop-off area is provided per contract/agreement with the਍ഀ Town as part of the Arrabelle project. The proposed project conforms to this policy.਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 15਍ഀ C. Character of the Neighborhood਍ഀ Vail Spa਍ഀ Strata Vail਍ഀ This area of lionshead has undergone a major transformation over਍ഀ the last few years, and properties in the vicinity continue to upgrade.਍ഀ Early redevelopment projects, such as the Antlers and the Vail਍ഀ Marriott set the tone for improving existing buildings under the਍ഀ Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Montoneros undertook a਍ഀ major remodel more recently. The Lionshead Inn and the Fabulous਍ഀ Vail Glo Lodge were recently approved for redevelopment by the਍ഀ Town of Vail, and have set a more modern precedent for the਍ഀ neighborhood, complimentary to the near-by Vail Spa. Discussions਍ഀ of redevelopment of Concert Hall plaza are continuing. Finally, the਍ഀ landmark, the most adjacent neighbor of the North Day Lot, also਍ഀ recently was approved for a major renovation and is currently under਍ഀ construction. At this point in time, it is unknown what the future plans਍ഀ are for the Westwind.਍ഀ The plans for the redevelopment of the North Day Lot as an਍ഀ employee housing project will be complimentary to the character of਍ഀ the neighborhood. As an employee housing project, having people਍ഀ permanently reside in the Lionshead neighborhood will provide for a਍ഀ more vibrant community. The architectural character is also਍ഀ complimentary to the Lionshead neighborhood.਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 16਍ഀ Vail Marriott਍ഀ The Antlers਍ഀ Westwind (Winter 2008਍ഀ •਍ഀ ~71਍ഀ landmark (Winter 2008)਍ഀ D. Other Applicable Elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan਍ഀ The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan has been covered in depth in previous sections of this submittal and਍ഀ is incorporated here by reference. The Vail Land Use Plan, which was originally adopted in 1986, also਍ഀ includes goals that are applicable to this project.਍ഀ 17਍ഀ North Day lot Employee Housing - Proposed਍ഀ 1. 7 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between਍ഀ residential, commercial, and recreational uses to serve both the visi/or and the permanent਍ഀ resident.਍ഀ 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible.਍ഀ 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (in/ll਍ഀ areas).਍ഀ 2.7 The commumly should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating day਍ഀ skiers.਍ഀ 2.2 The ski area owner, the business community and the Town leaders should work together to਍ഀ improve facilities for day skiers.਍ഀ 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted by਍ഀ limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions.਍ഀ 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range of housing਍ഀ types.਍ഀ 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee਍ഀ housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites throughout the community.਍ഀ Now over 30 years old, the Town of Vail Land Use Plan is outdated in general, but many of the concepts of਍ഀ the plan are applicable to development today. The development of the North Day Lot helps to further these਍ഀ goals as outlined in the Vail Land Use Plan.਍ഀ 18਍ഀ VIII. Criteria for Review Parking Reduction਍ഀ Section 12-10-20: Special Review Provisions, Vail Town Code, allows the Planning and Environmental਍ഀ Commission to approve a reduction to the number of parking spaces required by the Vail Town Code. The਍ഀ Town Code requires 1 .4 parking spaces per employee housing unit, or a total requirement of 44.8 spaces.਍ഀ The North Day Lot, as proposed, will provide 1.25 parking spaces per employee housing unit, or a total of਍ഀ 40 parking spaces (a reduction of approximately 10%). In addition to the 40 parking spaces for the਍ഀ employee housing, an additional 9 spaces are provided on-site for skier drop-off. Skier drop-off will be signed਍ഀ for short-term use during the hours of 7:00 am - 5:00 pm and during the ski season only, but will be available਍ഀ to the employee housing project at all other times. Section 12-10-20 provides the following criteria for review਍ഀ of a parking reduction:਍ഀ A. The parking demand will be less than the requirements identified in section 12-10-10 of this chapter.਍ഀ The employee housing units at the North Day Lot will be owned and managed by Vail Resorts, and਍ഀ occupied by employees working on Vail Mountain. This allows for the following considerations:਍ഀ • The residents of the North Day Lot are primarily seasonal workers.਍ഀ 4 • The residents of the North Day lot will not need vehicles to travel to their place of employment.਍ഀ • Vail Resorts has the ability to ensure that the residents of the North Day lot will not bring਍ഀ excessive numbers of vehicles, by leasing only to employees who agree to this requirement.਍ഀ Research of parking requirements for employee housing projects around the country indicate that the਍ഀ majority of employee housing projects are over-parked, especially if public transit is available. In਍ഀ many cases, parking ratios have been reduced to .75 - 1 spaces per unit. (from "Parking਍ഀ Requirements Guide for Affordable Housing Developers"). The State of Colorado also encourages਍ഀ reduced parking ratios for affordable housing projects (from "Affordable Housing: A Guide for Local਍ഀ Officials"). A recent PUD approval for Copper Mountain allows for a seasonal employee housing਍ഀ project to be parked at .39 spaces per unit. A review of parking requirements for multiple-family units਍ഀ and/or employee housing units for various resort communities indicate that Copper, Keystone,਍ഀ Sunlight, Steamboat Springs, and Telluride allow for 1 space per unit (from "Residential Parking Memo਍ഀ for Copper Mountain Resort"਍ഀ It is important to note that the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan also indicates that the parking਍ഀ requirement for employee housing at the North Day Lot should be reduced:਍ഀ c. Parking਍ഀ It may be appropriate to reduce the parking requirements for employee housing al this location਍ഀ given the sites proximity to transportation facilities, jobs, and pedestrian routes...਍ഀ 19਍ഀ B. The probable long term use of the building or structure, based on its design, will not generate਍ഀ additional parking demand.਍ഀ Unlike free-market projects within the Town of Vail, the North Day Lot units will be deed-restricted in਍ഀ accordance with Town requirements. The deed restriction clearly indicates that these units will remain਍ഀ as employee housing unless both Vail Resorts and the Town agree to lift the restriction. Therefore, the਍ഀ use within the building will likely not change, and therefore no additional parking demand is਍ഀ anticipated as a result of changing uses within the building.਍ഀ C. The use or activity is part of a demonstrated permanent program (including, but not limited to,਍ഀ "rideshare" programs, shuttle service, or staggered work shifts) intended to reduce parking demand that਍ഀ has been incorporated into the project's final approved development plan.਍ഀ This criterion was intended to find solutions to limit the number of vehicles that employees take to a site.਍ഀ Unlike a commercial or mixed-use development, the North Day lot will be occupied entirely by Vail਍ഀ Mountain employees who will be within walking distance to their job. As a result, this criterion does਍ഀ not apply to this project.਍ഀ D. Proximity or availability of alternative modes of transportation (including, but not limited to, public਍ഀ transit or shuttle services) is significant and integral to the nature of the use or business activity.਍ഀ The North Day Lot is on the Town of Vail bus route. As਍ഀ the map indicates, the North Day Lot is on the red and਍ഀ green routes (travelling all of West Vail and the Vail਍ഀ Transportation Center) and the in-town bus route਍ഀ (travelling all of Lionshead to Golden Peak). Additional਍ഀ routes are available over the pedestrian bridge. In਍ഀ addition to Town of Vail bus service, the ECO buses਍ഀ stop at Concert Hall plaza, steps away from the North ' ` "Vnf਍ഀ Day Lot. In fact, this site is better served by public y y p ascade ~਍ഀ transit than any other employee housing project in the Village਍ഀ Town of Vail. During the ski season, the buses run਍ഀ North Day Lot਍ഀ ~:r ~.4•:Gr1਍ഀ ~f਍ഀ i~਍ഀ Lionshead ; Mall਍ഀ more often than the off-season. It is important to note that those times when bus service is limited (i.e.਍ഀ off-season), the skier drop-off spaces are not needed, and the site is fully parked.਍ഀ 20਍ഀ IX. Adjacents਍ഀ TOWN OF VAIL਍ഀ C/O FINANCE DEPT਍ഀ 75 S FRONTAGE RD਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ VAIL CORP਍ഀ PO BOX 7਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81658਍ഀ LANDMARK CONDO ASSOCIATION਍ഀ GEOFFREY WRIGHT਍ഀ 610 W LIONSHEAD CR਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ BOSELLI FAMILY PTNSHP਍ഀ 3195 LAFAYETTE DR਍ഀ BOULDER, CO 80303਍ഀ ARTINIAN, RON਍ഀ 5 BRISTOL DR਍ഀ MANHASSET, NY 11030਍ഀ KUSHNER, SANDRA R. & LOUIS਍ഀ C/O ROTHMAN GORDON FOREMAN &਍ഀ GROUDINE PC਍ഀ THIRD FLOOR GRANT BUILDING਍ഀ PITTSBURGH, PA 15219਍ഀ CONCERT HALL PLAZA CONDOMINIUM HAVENS SEPARATE PROPERTY LIVING TRUST਍ഀ ASSOCIATION GARY J. HAVENS TRUSTEE਍ഀ JENNIFER L LUFMAN 226 14TH ST਍ഀ 1700 LINCOLN STREET, SUITE 2400, SANTA MONICA, CA 90402਍ഀ DENVER, CO 80203਍ഀ MONTANEROS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,਍ഀ INC.਍ഀ KEITH ODZA਍ഀ 641 W LIONSHEAD CIR,਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ SCHNELL, PAUL & MADELEINE D.਍ഀ 225 CENTRAL PARK਍ഀ NEW YORK, NY 10024਍ഀ INFINITY HOLDINGS AT VAIL LLC਍ഀ 7400 E CRESTLINE CIR 125਍ഀ GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111਍ഀ THE MARK-LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,਍ഀ INC. BILLOTTI, PATRICIA਍ഀ DAVE PEASE 18 POWDER HILL਍ഀ 715 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE SADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ DIAMONDROCK VAIL OWNER LLC਍ഀ C/O DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY CO਍ഀ 6903 ROCKLEDGE DR STE 800਍ഀ BETHESDA, MD 20817਍ഀ FINK, DAVID H. & AMY L.਍ഀ 2900 LAKEWOODS CT਍ഀ W BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323਍ഀ VAIL VALLEY RENTALS LLC਍ഀ 140 FAIRFAX ST਍ഀ DENVER, CO 80220਍ഀ FILES, JEFF P.਍ഀ 1019 KIMBALL DR਍ഀ DURHAM, NC 27705਍ഀ ECCKER, JOHN F. & PATRICIA L.਍ഀ 7734 LAUREL LEAF DR਍ഀ POTOMAC, MD 20854਍ഀ CAPLA, TOMAS J. & JUDITH਍ഀ J.਍ഀ 2500 JOHNSON AVE਍ഀ RIVERDALE, NY 10463਍ഀ VAIL SPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOC਍ഀ 710 W LIONSHEAD CIR਍ഀ VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ VAIL SPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION਍ഀ DANN PETER਍ഀ PO BOX 5480,਍ഀ AVON, CO 81620਍ഀ 21਍ഀ ENZIAN AT VAIL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION਍ഀ GEOFFREY WRIGHT਍ഀ 610 W LIONSHEAD CIR,਍ഀ VAII, CO 81657਍ഀ CDOT਍ഀ 4201 E. ARKANSAS AVENUE਍ഀ DENVER, CO 80222਍ഀ VAIL CORP਍ഀ C/O VAIL RESORTS DEV CO਍ഀ PO BOX 959਍ഀ AVON, CO 81620਍ഀ LIONSHEAD INN LLC਍ഀ 705 WEST LIONSHEAD CIRCLE਍ഀ VAII, CO 81657਍ഀ LIONSHEAD INN LLC਍ഀ MARA M. KLEINSCHMIDT਍ഀ PO BOX 1050਍ഀ EAGLE, CO 81631਍ഀ VAIL MANAGEMENT COMPANY - WESTWIND਍ഀ C/O VAIL MANAGEMENT COMPANY,਍ഀ PO BOX 6130਍ഀ AVON, CO 81620਍ഀ HUGHES LAND HOLDING TRUST਍ഀ 28 ANACAPA ST. SUITE D਍ഀ SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101਍ഀ K਍ഀ J਍ഀ 22਍ഀ C•:਍ഀ 0਍ഀ H਍ഀ Z਍ഀ w਍ഀ 0਍ഀ w਍ഀ V਍ഀ w਍ഀ a਍ഀ w਍ഀ l7਍ഀ Q਍ഀ Z਍ഀ w਍ഀ Q਍ഀ z਍ഀ 0਍ഀ N਍ഀ J਍ഀ Q਍ഀ z਍ഀ O਍ഀ H਍ഀ U਍ഀ w਍ഀ n਍ഀ I਍ഀ w਍ഀ c7਍ഀ a਍ഀ z਍ഀ C7਍ഀ J਍ഀ H਍ഀ z਍ഀ w਍ഀ z਍ഀ O਍ഀ W਍ഀ a਍ഀ z਍ഀ 0਍ഀ N਍ഀ F-਍ഀ z਍ഀ W਍ഀ w਍ഀ Q਍ഀ z਍ഀ w਍ഀ w਍ഀ J਍ഀ Q਍ഀ •਍ഀ •਍ഀ G਍ഀ z਍ഀ J਍ഀ CL਍ഀ W਍ഀ z yK਍ഀ Z0਍ഀ 1਍ഀ N਍ഀ LLJ਍ഀ W >਍ഀ Z਍ഀ on਍ഀ O਍ഀ J O W਍ഀ Ol਍ഀ u3O਍ഀ LLJ Q. o LL਍ഀ LL N਍ഀ 1਍ഀ t਍ഀ 1਍ഀ •਍ഀ L਍ഀ t਍ഀ 5਍ഀ r਍ഀ .ate਍ഀ v਍ഀ co਍ഀ Q਍ഀ i਍ഀ O I-਍ഀ W G਍ഀ W਍ഀ z W਍ഀ Q S਍ഀ z਍ഀ r਍ഀ 00਍ഀ to Z LL਍ഀ :਍ഀ :਍ഀ ਍ഀ r਍ഀ i਍ഀ J 5਍ഀ Y਍ഀ fit,਍ഀ "਍ഀ a਍ഀ z਍ഀ ਍ഀ O਍ഀ LZ Z਍ഀ Z cn਍ഀ s਍ഀ c਍ഀ N਍ഀ G਍ഀ al`਍ഀ '਍ഀ O C਍ഀ Z i਍ഀ W J਍ഀ v ti਍ഀ ttttM db਍ഀ ~ z਍ഀ V a਍ഀ ~਍ഀ 2਍ഀ .Q.਍ഀ Z J਍ഀ ZQ~਍ഀ _਍ഀ V Q਍ഀ i਍ഀ ~ZO਍ഀ '਍ഀ W ~ _਍ഀ •਍ഀ O਍ഀ w਍ഀ V਍ഀ w_਍ഀ w i਍ഀ MQ4਍ഀ w w਍ഀ V਍ഀ Q Z a਍ഀ z>਍ഀ - 8਍ഀ a ga਍ഀ cr_਍ഀ CL a਍ഀ a v w਍ഀ J =਍ഀ Q a z਍ഀ o ~਍ഀ U11_ V J t਍ഀ LL 3 v.਍ഀ O ~ s਍ഀ O - Q Z਍ഀ a v~`rz~~ ~ E i਍ഀ L.- j f •਍ഀ CL਍ഀ 4 •਍ഀ O਍ഀ cr_਍ഀ w z _9਍ഀ ~ I w W o0਍ഀ V) o ® S~ • ~W ~o਍ഀ Y j • •਍ഀ i ,਍ഀ h. O J G • p 4਍ഀ I਍ഀ i਍ഀ - n਍ഀ ~Tr4~''` a0 I u'~਍ഀ 1 W਍ഀ Lei Z਍ഀ ,t ~ r Q਍ഀ Z਍ഀ r a ~ ~ o਍ഀ .I,t)'1Y~7y)[J\1 r ~ ,III ~ i s _ ° Z਍ഀ h r਍ഀ z F z਍ഀ p r O © Z਍ഀ c~਍ഀ •਍ഀ O਍ഀ 0਍ഀ a਍ഀ 0਍ഀ a~਍ഀ W਍ഀ O਍ഀ INN*਍ഀ c਍ഀ 0਍ഀ H਍ഀ E਍ഀ 0਍ഀ V਍ഀ 0਍ഀ E਍ഀ 0਍ഀ W਍ഀ r.7਍ഀ O*--਍ഀ O਍ഀ O਍ഀ CNJ਍ഀ o,-਍ഀ C~਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ J਍ഀ 0਍ഀ F,਍ഀ 3਍ഀ I N,਍ഀ f਍ഀ "ems਍ഀ 3' <਍ഀ Q~y਍ഀ w`4਍ഀ r~਍ഀ a~ V਍ഀ V਍ഀ lJ਍ഀ w਍ഀ t.~਍ഀ L~਍ഀ LL1਍ഀ H਍ഀ to਍ഀ V਍ഀ ~r਍ഀ Q਍ഀ ~A਍ഀ 5਍ഀ ! 1਍ഀ t਍ഀ ~y਍ഀ i l t਍ഀ f-਍ഀ e਍ഀ 1਍ഀ t਍ഀ r'਍ഀ i.਍ഀ a h਍ഀ ਍ഀ uj਍ഀ R~਍ഀ IE਍ഀ 2:਍ഀ a~਍ഀ ~a਍ഀ '਍ഀ US਍ഀ aim਍ഀ U,਍ഀ L਍ഀ AM s਍ഀ #਍ഀ e਍ഀ O਍ഀ f਍ഀ &਍ഀ n਍ഀ i਍ഀ W਍ഀ Lli਍ഀ LtJ਍ഀ •਍ഀ CJ਍ഀ s3਍ഀ 8.਍ഀ gg਍ഀ ~1਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ~ G~K਍ഀ F਍ഀ ~ e~..਍ഀ ~`v਍ഀ 3-਍ഀ •਍ഀ •਍ഀ •਍ഀ !M~m `e਍ഀ •਍ഀ L M਍ഀ Q_'਍ഀ C)਍ഀ L਍ഀ V਍ഀ w"਍ഀ Y.਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ Oy਍ഀ i਍ഀ m਍ഀ co਍ഀ p਍ഀ a~i m਍ഀ O਍ഀ r>਍ഀ v਍ഀ Q [D U਍ഀ Li! in਍ഀ ,਍ഀ O਍ഀ I I਍ഀ :਍ഀ Cl਍ഀ LL਍ഀ U)਍ഀ Co਍ഀ h,਍ഀ ਍ഀ of _਍ഀ m਍ഀ LL਍ഀ U)਍ഀ co਍ഀ F-਍ഀ Z -਍ഀ M਍ഀ m਍ഀ w਍ഀ u਍ഀ Z਍ഀ w਍ഀ F7਍ഀ w਍ഀ Q_਍ഀ x਍ഀ w਍ഀ S਍ഀ 0਍ഀ rl਍ഀ CL਍ഀ LL਍ഀ O਍ഀ a਍ഀ Crr~਍ഀ ~਍ഀ r)਍ഀ cr-਍ഀ w਍ഀ S2਍ഀ w਍ഀ ~C਍ഀ CL਍ഀ w਍ഀ u਍ഀ z਍ഀ 0਍ഀ V਍ഀ Y਍ഀ ਍ഀ V਍ഀ xC(਍ഀ G਍ഀ V਍ഀ y All਍ഀ a਍ഀ i਍ഀ Ul਍ഀ Q਍ഀ D਍ഀ Z਍ഀ V਍ഀ a਍ഀ QS਍ഀ g਍ഀ Z਍ഀ z਍ഀ Ej਍ഀ z਍ഀ ki਍ഀ Ln਍ഀ V)਍ഀ G਍ഀ n਍ഀ C1C਍ഀ u਍ഀ LU਍ഀ CL਍ഀ cn਍ഀ LU਍ഀ n਍ഀ Lt਍ഀ LL਍ഀ 0਍ഀ t਍ഀ 0਍ഀ w਍ഀ v~਍ഀ Z)਍ഀ F--਍ഀ LLJ਍ഀ u਍ഀ z਍ഀ Q਍ഀ V਍ഀ E਍ഀ 5 J411,-,਍ഀ !461਍ഀ Z਍ഀ Ll.਍ഀ CC਍ഀ 0਍ഀ LL.਍ഀ V਍ഀ CL.਍ഀ E--਍ഀ a਍ഀ 7-਍ഀ W਍ഀ Y਍ഀ c਍ഀ a਍ഀ a਍ഀ s਍ഀ s਍ഀ u਍ഀ r਍ഀ µ਍ഀ z਍ഀ LL਍ഀ O਍ഀ J਍ഀ 1L .J਍ഀ Z a'਍ഀ U) f਍ഀ An,਍ഀ W਍ഀ I J.J਍ഀ LLJ਍ഀ V)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ CL਍ഀ 0਍ഀ C1..਍ഀ 0? 0? O Z਍ഀ 00 00਍ഀ 3: F V)਍ഀ JV ;,ff਍ഀ Application for Review by tf਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Com 4 TOWN OF VAIL Department of Community Development਍ഀ 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657਍ഀ tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452਍ഀ web: www.vailgov.com਍ഀ G II f਍ഀ ,~c~odr~ D਍ഀ NOV 10 20118਍ഀ OF VAIL਍ഀ enera n ormation.਍ഀ All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a਍ഀ building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested.਍ഀ An application for Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information਍ഀ is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town਍ഀ Council and/or the Design Review Board.਍ഀ Type of Application and Fee:਍ഀ • Rezoning਍ഀ $1300਍ഀ Conditional Use Permit਍ഀ $650਍ഀ • Major Subdivision਍ഀ $1500਍ഀ Floodplain Modification਍ഀ $400਍ഀ • Minor Subdivision਍ഀ $650਍ഀ Minor Exterior Alteration਍ഀ $650਍ഀ • Exemption Plat਍ഀ $650਍ഀ Major Exterior Alteration਍ഀ $800਍ഀ • Minor Amendment to an SDD਍ഀ $1000਍ഀ Development Plan਍ഀ $1500਍ഀ • New Special Development District $6000਍ഀ Amendment to a Development Plan਍ഀ $250਍ഀ • Major Amendment to an SDD਍ഀ $6000਍ഀ Zoning Code Amendment਍ഀ $1300਍ഀ • Major Amendment to an SDD਍ഀ $1250਍ഀ Variance਍ഀ $500਍ഀ (no exterior modifications)਍ഀ Sign Variance਍ഀ $200਍ഀ Description of the Request:਍ഀ Major Exterior Alteration to allow for the development਍ഀ of the North Day਍ഀ Lot.਍ഀ Location of the Proposal: Lot:਍ഀ 1 Block: 1਍ഀ Subdivision: Vail Lionshead Filing 3਍ഀ Physical Address:਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ Parcel No.: 210106308004਍ഀ (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)਍ഀ Zoning: Lionshead Mixed Use 1਍ഀ Name(s) of Owner(s): Vail਍ഀ Resorts Development Company਍ഀ Mailing Address: 137 Benchmark Road਍ഀ Avon, CO਍ഀ 8 0਍ഀ Phone: 970-745-2544਍ഀ Owner(s) Signature(s): el਍ഀ l 6 4~n Y,਍ഀ Name of Applicant: Allison K t mauriello਍ഀ Planning Group਍ഀ Mailing Address: POB 1127਍ഀ Avon, CO਍ഀ 81620਍ഀ Phone: 970-748-0920਍ഀ E-mail Address: allison@mpg਍ഀ vail.com਍ഀ Fax 970-748-0377਍ഀ For Off' nly:਍ഀ Fee Paid: Che k No.: v B y: Meeting Date 0 C No.਍ഀ Planner: Project No..਍ഀ ~(3C1਍ഀ Page 1 of 2-04/01/04਍ഀ (11/17/2008) Warren Campbell -North Day Lot comments Page 1਍ഀ From: Warren Campbell਍ഀ To: allison@mpgvail.com਍ഀ Date: 11/14/2008 3:37 PM਍ഀ Subject: North Day Lot comments਍ഀ Allison here is a list of the comments I have so far with regard to the North Day Lot.਍ഀ 1) Can there be an outdoor space provided for residences? May contain a grill and a couple of tables.਍ഀ 2) Show turning radii on the plan for trash truck, vehicles entering and exiting enclosed parking, and vehicles using the਍ഀ skier drop off.਍ഀ 3) Will there be any gates used to control access to the lot or enclosed parking?਍ഀ 4) Can some benches be provided in conjunction with the skier drop-off int he vicinity of the spaces to aid in the drop off?਍ഀ 5) ADA accessibility is a concern. There will be accessible units required. Please depict on plans. Can be done in਍ഀ conjunction with Building Permit.਍ഀ 6) Provide a traffic report. I did not find one in my materials for the current plan.਍ഀ 7) Several of the snow storage areas contain trees which are not permitted in snow storage areas. Please relocate trees so਍ഀ as to no interfere with snow storage.਍ഀ 8) On Level 1 who will have access to Residential Storage area?਍ഀ 9) On the north elevation on Level 2 (first floor of units) it appears that two units do not have decks, but it does look like਍ഀ they exit out onto grade either. Please explain what is occurring here.਍ഀ 10) On the south and west elevations are the screens located on the parking level to allow for passive venting?਍ഀ 11) Please depict where mechanical equipment is going. I am speculating that there is not much in the project, but since਍ഀ there is no flat roof I am just curious where it may end up going.਍ഀ 12) Please depict fire staging on the site plan.਍ഀ These are the comments so far. Wanted to get them to you so you could begin working on them.਍ഀ Thanks਍ഀ Warren਍ഀ VAIL RESORTS`਍ഀ Just Another Day In Paradise਍ഀ ^v. 0. 6, 49. a: 4਍ഀ February 22, 2008਍ഀ Mr. Dick Cleveland, Mayor਍ഀ Town of Vail਍ഀ 75 S. Frontage Road਍ഀ Vail, CO 81657਍ഀ Re: North Day Lot Submittal਍ഀ Dear Dick:਍ഀ Fit ►if copy਍ഀ On February 21, 2008 we submitted a complete development review application pursuant to the਍ഀ Core Site Employee Housing Agreement ("Agreement"). We are pleased to have provided that਍ഀ submittal in advance of the February 25, 2008 deadline as described in the Agreement. To਍ഀ summarize, that application includes a plan for proposed development on the North Day Lot with਍ഀ 120 newly constructed employee housing beds to comply with the Core Employee Housing਍ഀ Requirements. The plan also includes an easement area for the Town's proposed transit center as਍ഀ requested by you and your staff. The plan preserves the eastern portion of the site with the skier਍ഀ drop off during the construction of the western portion. A plan is provided for the future਍ഀ development of a condo/hotel project.਍ഀ To get cost analysis of the project and the Town's transit center, we retained the assistance of a਍ഀ reputable and nationally known contractor: Swinerton General Contractors. We have undertaken਍ഀ that analysis with the understanding that cost will be a key factor in the Town's identification of਍ഀ funds and the consideration of whether it desires to fund and build the transit center in this਍ഀ location. The Swinerton estimate is attached for your consideration and illustrates the cost of਍ഀ including a transit center as part of the North Day Lot employee housing project. As you will see਍ഀ from the cost analysis, the cost impact on the project to construct the transit center is਍ഀ approximately $14,384,555.24 which estimate includes both hard and soft costs. A number of਍ഀ variables and factors have contributed to the cost and we are prepared to meet and discuss those਍ഀ with you in more detail. The general site constraints are considerable and when coupled with the਍ഀ fact that infrastructure is needed for the transit center which is not required for other uses on the਍ഀ property, the incremental cost is higher and is reflected in that $14,384,555.24 figure. We are਍ഀ prepared to work with you, Town staff and the Town Council to review these estimates. It is਍ഀ important to note that if the Town elects to proceed with the transit center in this location we will਍ഀ need to have an agreement and funds in place at the time entitlements are complete so we can਍ഀ proceed with construction documents and commence construction.਍ഀ C' x,਍ഀ yVaii. ' ~(3 &nuA Teton਍ഀ 11 r, (i«! ski itFUtir x:t਍ഀ KEYSTONE'਍ഀ OMAN Vail Resorts Management Company Post Office Box 959 137 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81620਍ഀ 0਍ഀ The cost of the transit center to the Town coupled with criticism we have heard from adjoining਍ഀ property owners has caused us to contemplate a second plan which the Town may wish to਍ഀ consider. This plan includes the required employee housing with parking for that housing at਍ഀ grade, but does not include a transit center. With this plan, the skier drop off is also incorporated.਍ഀ While we understand and respect the Town's interest in having the transit center at this location,਍ഀ we are also very mindful that the primary goal of the plan is to satisfy our housing obligation਍ഀ related to Arrabelle. The Town may have interest in the fact that we anticipate that the length of਍ഀ construction could be shortened by approximately ten months if the transit center is moved to an਍ഀ alternate location. With that said, we remain fully committed to including a transit center on this਍ഀ site, if the Town so chooses and can secure the necessary funding.਍ഀ In the event that the Town chooses an alternate location for the transit center, we believe there਍ഀ are other locations for the transit center which are supported by the Lionshead Master Plan. For਍ഀ example, the Town's transit center can be accommodated in the Ever Vail project. The site਍ഀ constraints are few and the infrastructure required for a transit center can be absorbed as part of਍ഀ the planned loading and delivery system for that project. The costs associated with a transit਍ഀ center in this location would be significantly less than on North Day Lot. In addition,਍ഀ eliminating the transit center from the North Day Lot would significantly reduce the time to਍ഀ deliver the new employee housing beds. We are fully prepared to discuss this alternative, if you਍ഀ so choose.਍ഀ Finally, a parallel third scenario incorporates additional employee housing on the North Day Lot਍ഀ by increasing the number of beds to 130 under either of the above-referenced development਍ഀ AdW& concepts. Development of those additional beds would be contingent upon a determination by਍ഀ the Town that they will be used to satisfy the Front Door housing requirement. We appreciate਍ഀ that this would require an amendment to our existing agreement with the Town that requires that਍ഀ the housing for Front Door be provided no later than June 13, 2008. Given the time constraint,਍ഀ we currently anticipate satisfying that requirement through the placement of deed restrictions on਍ഀ existing units.਍ഀ Our Company is anxious to begin the process of bringing these new employee housing beds to਍ഀ Vail and are committed to being fully available to assist the Town in choosing its preferred path.਍ഀ We look forward to working with you and the Town to satisfy our obligations and to achieve਍ഀ your goals.਍ഀ Yours very truly,਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ «਍ഀ eith A Fe t andez, Pres rdent਍ഀ Enclosures਍ഀ cc: Rob Katz਍ഀ Michael Brekka਍ഀ Stan Zemler਍ഀ George Ruther਍ഀ (01/05/2009) George Ruther - ToV process Page 1਍ഀ From: Michael Brekka <MBrekka@vailresorts.com>਍ഀ To: GRuther@vailgov.com"' <GRuther@vailgov.com>, Thomas Miller <TMiller1@v...਍ഀ Date: 01/05/2009 7:22 AM਍ഀ Subject: ToV process਍ഀ George:਍ഀ I will not be at the meeting today regarding NDL. However, I would hope that it enables both teams to set a਍ഀ clear path for developing the site that is logical. When we met a few Thursdays ago with Greg, I thought਍ഀ we had made some progress on defining the parameters for developing the site and the appropriate਍ഀ additional improvements provided by Vail.਍ഀ As you know, we strongly believe that an access onto the frontage road is unreasonable burden with਍ഀ minimal benefit to the utilization of the property.਍ഀ According to our Mtn. Ops guys, the Skier Drop-Off is not the best location in the Town of Vail, but they਍ഀ can work with it.਍ഀ I would hope that amunst your team, leadership can prevail that sees the logic in not forcing a Frontage਍ഀ road access on a restricted site containing employee housing.਍ഀ Thanks਍ഀ Michael਍ഀ C0J*Je਍ഀ CPTED SUGGESTIONS਍ഀ NORTH DAY LOT਍ഀ TREES AND SIGNS਍ഀ • Trees need to be kept trimmed so signs are clearly visible.਍ഀ • Clear visibility discourages illegal activity.਍ഀ •਍ഀ ■ I਍ഀ 0਍ഀ •਍ഀ r਍ഀ I਍ഀ r਍ഀ 5਍ഀ I਍ഀ z਍ഀ c~•਍ഀ 44਍ഀ 0਍ഀ •਍ഀ 0਍ഀ r਍ഀ s਍ഀ l਍ഀ a਍ഀ r਍ഀ wee ~ .਍ഀ as a!~_sy 1਍ഀ A਍ഀ 0਍ഀ n਍ഀ LIGHTING ON PATHWAY਍ഀ • We suggest lighting be installed in the area.਍ഀ • Please make sure there is a well lit path free of obstacles.਍ഀ U'਍ഀ 0਍ഀ EW਍ഀ •਍ഀ 0਍ഀ •਍ഀ INK਍ഀ "x਍ഀ ETA ti ~S ~ m਍ഀ k 1਍ഀ t਍ഀ aa~ Paz ro$-Y_਍ഀ 0਍ഀ PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE਍ഀ • Per Town of Vail ordinance all garbage containers must be wildlife਍ഀ resistant.਍ഀ •਍ഀ 11਍ഀ r਍ഀ 0਍ഀ E਍ഀ FIRE EGRESS਍ഀ tk਍ഀ • The fire staging area is 13 frpt north of the 5 east parking spaces in਍ഀ our 15 minute parking area. The FDCs are on the South East corner਍ഀ of the property of the Landmark Tower.਍ഀ • This creates a hazard to the last vehicle parked in this last space.਍ഀ • This may also cause a slower response time for emergency vehicles.਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ C7਍ഀ U਍ഀ MEMORANDUM਍ഀ To: Project File਍ഀ From: Warren Campbell, Chief of Planning਍ഀ Date: January 7, 2009਍ഀ Re: North Day Lot Internal; Meeting Minutes, January 6, 2009਍ഀ Attendees:਍ഀ Stan Zemler, Town Manager਍ഀ Greg Hall, Public Works Director਍ഀ George Ruther, Community Development Director਍ഀ Warren Campbell, Chief of Planning਍ഀ Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer਍ഀ At this meeting the Town Staff discussed the North Day Lot major exterior alteration਍ഀ application. The discussion focused on skier drop-off, vehicular access and frontage਍ഀ road curb cuts, and traffic and pedestrian circulation. The comments are those of the਍ഀ Town Staff. Additional comments and requirements may be provided by the Planning &਍ഀ Environmental Commission, Design Review Board and/or the Vail Town Council.਍ഀ • The required skier drop off should be located on the western end of the site.਍ഀ Skier drop-off on the west end of the site separates the land uses and improves਍ഀ traffic flows. Skier drop off on the western end of the site can be designed to਍ഀ accommodate a one-way traffic flow. The skier drop off remains a requirement of਍ഀ the Arrabelle at Vail Square project.਍ഀ • Preservation of a potential future South Frontage Road access to the site is਍ഀ required. The preserved location for the future potential access point shall fully਍ഀ comply with adopted CDOT access standards. Said location shall be noted and਍ഀ dimensioned on the approved development plan਍ഀ • VRDC may propose to use Town-ovyned land to improve the function of the skier਍ഀ drop-off. Town-owned land shall not be used to accommodate the required਍ഀ employee housing project. The Town may request to be compensation for use of਍ഀ Town-owned land.਍ഀ • VRDC shall be responsible for the design costs and the construction of the਍ഀ required West Lionshead Circle roadway improvements.਍ഀ • VRDC shall be responsible for the design costs and construction of਍ഀ Improvements to Tract C. The scope of work and actual improvements shall be਍ഀ as depicted on the approved development plan.਍ഀ • The skier drop off shall include skier drop off amenities. For example, entry਍ഀ signage, landscaping, site furnishings, lighting, benches, shelter, etc. Said਍ഀ amenities shall be as depicted on the approved development plans.਍ഀ • Adequate snow storage shall be required as regulated by the Town's Zoning਍ഀ Regulations and Development Standards.਍ഀ • VRDC shall grant an easement to the Town of Vail for public use of the skier਍ഀ drop-off area. The easement must be in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney਍ഀ and the Vail Town Council.਍ഀ • Please provide a revised schedule for the construction of the required 120਍ഀ employee housing units.਍ഀ 4OwxoFVAIL਍ഀ Department of Public Works & Transportation਍ഀ 1309 Elkhorn Drive਍ഀ Vail, CO 81657਍ഀ 970-479-2158਍ഀ Fax: 970-479-2166਍ഀ www.vailgov.com਍ഀ MEMO਍ഀ To: Warren Campbell, George Ruther਍ഀ From: Greg Hall, Tom Kassmel਍ഀ Re: North Day Lot -PEC Review-Preliminary comments਍ഀ Date: 1 /21 /09਍ഀ The Town of Vail Public Works Department has received the Planning and Environmental Commission submittal਍ഀ plan set dated 1/19/09 for the North Day Lot Development. Based on our review the following shall be addressed਍ഀ prior to PEC approval or as otherwise noted. Additional comments will be provided when more detailed plans are਍ഀ provided.਍ഀ Comments਍ഀ 1. The access to the skier drop-off is not ideal, as it is generally hidden from view from the Frontage Rd.,਍ഀ and its proximity to the Frontage Rd. (existing -80', future -60') requires a driver to make an immediate਍ഀ turn into the lot from the Frontage Rd. which may easily may not be understood due to the congestion at਍ഀ the intersection. Possible mitigation include relocating the stairs from the pedestrian bridge and਍ഀ flattening the grade to provide better visibility and adding monumentation and signage in this location.਍ഀ It should be noted that per the pedestrian pass drawings the berm that is currently out there is mostly fill਍ഀ and one may be able to assume the utilities are buried to an appropriate depth based on the historic flat਍ഀ grade. Also additional wayfinding signage shall be added to the Frontage Rd. and at the access. Provide਍ഀ a sign program.਍ഀ 2. The Access easement being granted off the frontage Rd. should not be impeded by existing structure.਍ഀ 3. The gabion wall on the north side of the lot should be replaced or veneered with a new wall to provide a਍ഀ quality new product.਍ഀ 4. The cross slope across the skier drop-off area should be reduced to at least 3%.਍ഀ 5. The eastern most surface parking space for the housing development does not have adequate turning਍ഀ movement area to back out of the space.਍ഀ 6. The skier drop-off and drive lanes should be entirely heated to provide a safe and quality experience to਍ഀ our guests. The current configuration will be difficult to plow because of the tight radii and variation਍ഀ between heated and non-heated.਍ഀ 7. The tract C path should be heated to the connection with the E-W path on the north side.਍ഀ 8. The off-site Improvement needs to be clear that the right turn lane on W. LH will be built to the extent਍ഀ necessary to facilitate the new curb and gutter and walk, along with an appropriate portion of asphalt਍ഀ overlay. As-well as lighting, landscape and irrigation from the Landmark property and north.਍ഀ 9. The off-site improvement plan should show reconstruction and heated walk on tract C extending north਍ഀ to the E-W path and south to the southern Property line. The path should be pavers south of its਍ഀ intersection with the south E-W walk.਍ഀ 10. Additional lighting should be added along the Tract C path at the path intersections.਍ഀ 11. The south E-W walk should also be pavers.਍ഀ 12. The boiler should be upsized for the heating of the sun dial plaza steps and for the stairs from the਍ഀ pedestrian overpass. (To be paid for by Town)਍ഀ 13. The heating of the Skier-Drop should be the responsibility of Vail Resorts.਍ഀ 14. The necessary easements across VR and TOV property and management/maintenance/snowmelt਍ഀ agreements shall be completed prior to approval.਍ഀ 15. Provide a drainage study. Sand & Oil water quality vaults/measures shall be provided for all hard਍ഀ surface areas. All roof drains shall be tied into the storm sewer system and not spill out onto pedestrian਍ഀ or vehicular areas.਍ഀ 16. All snow shedding effects shall be mitigated in all pedestrian/vehicular areas.਍ഀ 17. Traffic Study:਍ഀ a. The traffic numbers assume the skier drop-off at LH Place creates a wash for the one at the North਍ഀ Day Lot. Because of location and enhancements the new skier drop-off should see an increased਍ഀ use, and actually take vehicles away from East LH circle (where illegal skier drop-off occurs),਍ഀ this should be reflected in the numbers. It should be also noted that the 2006 counts used at W.਍ഀ LH Circle did not include skier drop-off at LH Place, since LH Place skier drop no longer exited਍ഀ at that point due to the Arrabelle. There was however a Temp. skier Drop-off at Concert Hall਍ഀ Plaza, however again the enhanced drop-off at North Day lot should attract more trips.਍ഀ b. The 80% reduction taken for the employee housing, thus generating only 10 trips during the peak਍ഀ hour may be reasonable as long as the housing is specific to seasonal employees and there is no਍ഀ intention of using potential empty spaces for commuter employee parking. It may be prudent to਍ഀ assume more trips and confirm there is no additional impact.਍ഀ General Conditions of Approval਍ഀ 1. Please add the Town of Vail General Notes to construction plans. (Notes can be e-mailed upon request)਍ഀ 2. Please add Utility Signature block and have all utilities sign acknowledging acceptance of utility design.਍ഀ 3. All construction staging issues shall be resolved prior to construction including staging, phasing, access,਍ഀ schedules, traffic control, emergency access, etc...਍ഀ 4. A ROW/Utility permit shall be obtained and approved by the Town of Vail prior to commencing any਍ഀ construction within public Right of Way.਍ഀ 5. A Town of Vail Revocable ROW permit shall be recorded for all private property improvements located਍ഀ within public ways.਍ഀ 6. Prior to approval of a Building permit all necessary permanent and temporary easements are recorded with਍ഀ Eagle County.਍ഀ 7. Prior to approval of a Building permit a shoring and excavation plan shall be submitted including; excavation਍ഀ phasing, engineered shoring plans with plan, profile and cross sections. Cross Sections and plans shall਍ഀ include all existing conflicts (i.e. utilities).਍ഀ 8. Any excavation shoring methods used that encroach upon adjacent public or private property shall have਍ഀ approval by the appropriate owner and have a recorded easement prior to construction. This includes CDOT਍ഀ and the Town of Vail Right of Ways.਍ഀ 9. A CDPHE Permit and all applicable ACOE permits (i.e. Dewatering) shall be submitted prior to਍ഀ construction.਍ഀ 10. If temporary and/or permanent dewatering is anticipated during construction, a dewatering soils analysis will਍ഀ be required by a qualified licensed engineer analyzing the impact to adjacent properties(i.e. settlement)਍ഀ 11. Provide full civil construction drawings meeting Town of Vail standards prior to building permit submittal.਍ഀ Page 1 of 2਍ഀ Warren Campbell - FW: North Day Lot: Financial Impact of the curb cut਍ഀ From: Thomas Miller਍ഀ To: Warren Campbell , George Ruther , Greg Hall , "szemler@vailgov.com" ,਍ഀ "tkassmel@vailgov. com"਍ഀ Date: 01/05/2009 5:41 PM਍ഀ Subject: FW: North Day Lot: Financial Impact of the curb cut਍ഀ Per your request, please see below.਍ഀ Thanks,਍ഀ Tom਍ഀ Thomas Miller਍ഀ Director of Development਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ 137 Benchmark Road਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620਍ഀ (o) 970-754-2544਍ഀ (m) 970-470-1062਍ഀ Tmillerl@vailresorts.com਍ഀ www.evervaii.com਍ഀ www.snow.com਍ഀ AwDo you really need to print this e-mail?਍ഀ From: Brandt Marott਍ഀ Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 5:25 PM਍ഀ To: Thomas Miller਍ഀ Cc: Richard W. Funk; Orla Bannan; Kristin K. Williams਍ഀ Subject: North Day Lot: Financial Impact of the curb cut਍ഀ This is to summarize our findings as it relates to the financial impact of the curb cut on the frontage road based on਍ഀ Option 1A that the town commissioned which was presented to the Town Council on September 02, 2008 with਍ഀ Conceptual Pricing from Swinerton on August 15, 2008. Option 1A includes the transit development, 34 Units of਍ഀ employee housing, below grade parking and a curb cut off of the Frontage Road.਍ഀ Financial impact resulting from the curb cut include:਍ഀ 1.Concrete , including the first level of the podium that was extended from 8-15' on the north and eastern side਍ഀ of the building to accommodate pedestrian access/ ADA access਍ഀ 2.2 -stop elevator and associated stairs down to level 1.਍ഀ 3.Brid ge landing reconfiguration including the demo, regarding and retaining walls਍ഀ 4.Earth work and demolition required for the curb cut਍ഀ 51an dscape structured deck for pedestrian access਍ഀ 6.Pav ing, hardscape, and landscape located on Frontage road਍ഀ 7.Util ity relocation of the water, telephone, electric, gas and 18" RCP sewer਍ഀ file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\496246... 01/06/2009਍ഀ Page 2 of 2਍ഀ Items were selected that specifically relate to the curb cut in the Conceptual pricing that came to $2.1 million ($1.8਍ഀ million x 16% contractor burden related to the improvements) Please note that the above pricing does not meet਍ഀ CDOT standards as the curb cut is located too close to the Westwind entrance (within 150 feet). If the current਍ഀ plan was redesigned to meet CDOT approval, it would need to move west an additional 60' feet which could have਍ഀ a cost impact up to 750,000 based on the all of the associated costs of the relocation to the pedestrian bridge and਍ഀ ramp. Estimated total impact of $2.85 million; note that costs determined are based on conceptual drawings and਍ഀ subject to change upon finalization of plans and specifications.਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ Brandt Marott਍ഀ Sr. Project Manager਍ഀ Office: 970.754.2528਍ഀ Mobile: 970.331.3164਍ഀ BMarott@VailResorts.com਍ഀ The information contained in this message is confidential and intended only for the use of਍ഀ the individual or entity named above, and may be privileged. Any unauthorized review,਍ഀ use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please਍ഀ reply to the sender immediately, stating that you have received the message in error, then਍ഀ please delete this e-mail. Thank you.਍ഀ file://CADocuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\496246... 01/06/2009਍ഀ Application for Review by the਍ഀ Planning and Environmental Commission਍ഀ Department of Community Development਍ഀ TOWS' OF VAI>L਍ഀ 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657਍ഀ tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452਍ഀ web: www.vailgov.com਍ഀ General Information:਍ഀ All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a਍ഀ building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested.਍ഀ An application for Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information਍ഀ is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town਍ഀ Council and/or the Design Review Board.਍ഀ Type of Application and Fee:਍ഀ • Rezoning਍ഀ $1300਍ഀ )6 Conditional Use Permit਍ഀ $650਍ഀ • Major Subdivision਍ഀ $1500਍ഀ Floodplain Modification਍ഀ $400਍ഀ • Minor Subdivision਍ഀ $650਍ഀ Minor Exterior Alteration਍ഀ $650਍ഀ • Exemption Plat਍ഀ $650਍ഀ Major Exterior Alteration਍ഀ $800਍ഀ • Minor Amendment to an SDD਍ഀ $1000਍ഀ Development Plan਍ഀ $1500਍ഀ • New Special Development District਍ഀ $6000਍ഀ Amendment to a Development Plan਍ഀ $250਍ഀ • Major Amendment to an SDD਍ഀ $6000਍ഀ Zoning Code Amendment਍ഀ $1300਍ഀ • Major Amendment to an SDD਍ഀ $1250਍ഀ Variance਍ഀ $500਍ഀ (no exterior modifications)਍ഀ Sign Variance਍ഀ $200਍ഀ Description of the Request: Conditional use permit for the Transportation Facility਍ഀ Location of the Proposal: Lot:_ 1 Block: 1਍ഀ Physical Address: JK00਍ഀ Parcel No.: 210106308004਍ഀ Zoning: Lion ad Mixed Us਍ഀ Vail Lionshead Filing 3਍ഀ rcle਍ഀ Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)਍ഀ e(s) of O਍ഀ 4ldres M 1-S. 3Wtage Rd਍ഀ 58਍ഀ Phone:਍ഀ Owner(ILSiMptureTs):਍ഀ e oflilllDDlicant:਍ഀ ress: POB 1127਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620਍ഀ E-mail Address: allison@mpgvail.com Fax 970-748-0377਍ഀ Phone: 970-748-0920਍ഀ For Office Use nly: f 1਍ഀ Fee Paid: Check No.: By: / o਍ഀ Meeting Date: N D~_~ PEC No.: -4਍ഀ 'fanner: I~GT 2 Project No.:਍ഀ Page 1 of 2-04/01/04਍ഀ ~vog -did(਍ഀ -u਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ IL਍ഀ Land Title Guarantee Company਍ഀ rnd-rMe Date: 11-02-2007਍ഀ Our Order Number: V50021065਍ഀ fWARANTEE COMPANY਍ഀ Property Address:਍ഀ LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VAIL/LIONSHEAD THIRD FILING VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ Buyer/Borrower:਍ഀ THE VAIL CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION਍ഀ Seller/Owner:਍ഀ THE VAIL CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION਍ഀ Need a map or directions for your upcoming closing? Checkout Land Title's web site at www.ltgc.com਍ഀ lul- UUMUU113 lv alav v1 Waal Ja vaaia.v ava.auvlau.਍ഀ ESTIMATE OF TITLE FEES਍ഀ Information Binder $183.00਍ഀ If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, above fees will be collected at that time.਍ഀ TOTAL਍ഀ $183.00਍ഀ r.- CQIn= 66/66 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER!਍ഀ Chicago Title Insurance Company਍ഀ ALTA COMMITMENT਍ഀ Our Order No. V50021065਍ഀ Schedule A Cust. Ref.:਍ഀ Property Address:਍ഀ LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VAIL/LIONSHEAD THIRD FILING VAIL, CO 81657਍ഀ 1. Effective Date: October 26, 2007 at 5:00 P.M.਍ഀ 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured:਍ഀ Information Binder਍ഀ Proposed Insured:਍ഀ THE VAIL CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION਍ഀ $0.00਍ഀ 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:਍ഀ A Fee Simple਍ഀ 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:਍ഀ THE VAIL CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION਍ഀ 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:਍ഀ LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VAIL/LIONSHEAD, THIRD FILING, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT਍ഀ THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS CONVEYED IN਍ഀ DEEDS RECORDED NOVEMBER 3, 1972 IN BOOK 226 AT PAGE 32 AND RECORDED JULY 11,਍ഀ 1983 IN BOOK 363 AT PAGE 341.਍ഀ ALTA COMMITMENT਍ഀ Schedule B - Section 2਍ഀ (Exceptions) Our Order No. V50021065਍ഀ The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed਍ഀ of to the satisfaction of the Company:਍ഀ Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.਍ഀ 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.਍ഀ Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and਍ഀ inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.਍ഀ 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and਍ഀ not shown by the public records.਍ഀ 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or਍ഀ attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for਍ഀ value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.਍ഀ 6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records.o the Treasurer's office.਍ഀ 7. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any..਍ഀ 8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the mortgage, if any, noted in Section 1 of Schedule B hereof.਍ഀ 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE਍ഀ THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES਍ഀ AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 24, 1904, IN BOOK 48 AT਍ഀ PAGE 503 AND IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1923 IN BOOK 93਍ഀ AT PAGE 98.਍ഀ 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE਍ഀ UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 24, 1904,਍ഀ IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 503 AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1923 IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE਍ഀ 98 AND JULY 13, 1939 IN BOOK 123 AT PAGE 617.਍ഀ 11. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,਍ഀ BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE,਍ഀ COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS,਍ഀ DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS਍ഀ SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT਍ഀ SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED਍ഀ IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 18, 1970, IN BOOK 217 AT PAGE 675 AND AS਍ഀ AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 30, 1970 IN BOOK 218 AT PAGE 334 AND਍ഀ AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1970 IN BOOK 218 AT PAGE਍ഀ 899.਍ഀ ALTA COMMITMENT਍ഀ Schedule B - Section 2਍ഀ (Exceptions) Our Order No. V50021065਍ഀ The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed਍ഀ of to the satisfaction of the Company:਍ഀ 12. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,਍ഀ BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE,਍ഀ COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS,਍ഀ DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS਍ഀ SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT਍ഀ SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED਍ഀ IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1971, IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 991 AND AS਍ഀ AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 12, 1977 IN BOOK 258 AT PAGE 453.਍ഀ 13. EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES਍ഀ AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL/LIONSHEAD, THIRD FILING.਍ഀ 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF TRENCH, CONDUIT AND VAULT AGREEMENT਍ഀ RECORDED OCTOBER 01, 2004 AT RECEPTION NO. 893086.਍ഀ 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF TRENCH, CONDUIT AND VAULT AGREEMENT਍ഀ RECORDED JULY 08, 2005 AT RECEPTION NO. 922031.਍ഀ LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY and LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION਍ഀ DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS਍ഀ Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:਍ഀ A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.਍ഀ B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County਍ഀ Treasurer's authorized agent.਍ഀ C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from਍ഀ the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.਍ഀ Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing਍ഀ in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom਍ഀ margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that਍ഀ does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms਍ഀ on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document.਍ഀ Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every਍ഀ title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording਍ഀ whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal਍ഀ documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee਍ഀ Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the਍ഀ legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title਍ഀ Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.਍ഀ Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion਍ഀ of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be਍ഀ issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:਍ഀ A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which਍ഀ includes a condominium or townhouse unit.਍ഀ B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of਍ഀ construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.਍ഀ C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed਍ഀ mechanic's and material-men's liens.਍ഀ D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.਍ഀ E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased਍ഀ within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage਍ഀ for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information਍ഀ as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully਍ഀ executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements਍ഀ as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.਍ഀ No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured਍ഀ has contracted for or agreed to pay.਍ഀ Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:਍ഀ This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument਍ഀ exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2.਍ഀ A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise਍ഀ conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party਍ഀ holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and਍ഀ B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the਍ഀ surface owner's permission.਍ഀ Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages਍ഀ referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied.਍ഀ Form DISCLOSURE 09/01/02਍ഀ NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY਍ഀ Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies / Chicago Title Insurance Company਍ഀ Security Union Title Insurance Company਍ഀ July 1, 2001਍ഀ We recognize and respect the privacy expectations of today's consumers and the reqquirements of applicable federal and਍ഀ state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-pubi'ic personal information ("Personal਍ഀ Information and to whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public਍ഀ that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy਍ഀ Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws.਍ഀ In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:਍ഀ * From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;਍ഀ * From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others;਍ഀ * From our internet web sites;਍ഀ * From the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those਍ഀ entities, or from our affiliates or others; and਍ഀ * From consumer or other reporting agencies.਍ഀ Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information਍ഀ We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized਍ഀ access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in਍ഀ connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes.਍ഀ Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information਍ഀ We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real਍ഀ estate settlement service providers. We also may disclose your Personal Information:਍ഀ * to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;਍ഀ * to t u•d-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other਍ഀ functions on our behalf; and਍ഀ * to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you਍ഀ may find of interest.਍ഀ In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission, when we are required਍ഀ by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal਍ഀ Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed਍ഀ to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.਍ഀ One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public਍ഀ domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information.਍ഀ Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion਍ഀ Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out਍ഀ to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request਍ഀ correction, amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to਍ഀ charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests.਍ഀ All requests submitted to the Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company਍ഀ shall be in writing, and delivered to the following address:਍ഀ Privacy Compliance Officer਍ഀ Fidelityty National Financial, Inc.਍ഀ 4050 Calle Real, Suite 220਍ഀ Santa Barbara, CA 93110਍ഀ Multiple Products or Services਍ഀ If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice਍ഀ from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.਍ഀ Form PRIV.POL.CHI਍ഀ NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF਍ഀ LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION਍ഀ AND਍ഀ MERIDIAN LAND TITLE, L.L.C., A COLORADO LIMITED LIABLITY COMPANY, D/B/A਍ഀ LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION਍ഀ This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company, a Colorado corporation and਍ഀ Meridian Land Title, LLC, d/b/a Land Title Guarantee Company - Grand Junction.਍ഀ We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal਍ഀ and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your਍ഀ trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external਍ഀ safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information").਍ഀ In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:਍ഀ * applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our਍ഀ web-based transaction management system;਍ഀ * your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others;਍ഀ * a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;਍ഀ and਍ഀ * the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities,਍ഀ or from our affiliates and non-affiliates.਍ഀ Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as਍ഀ follows:਍ഀ * We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that਍ഀ information in order to provide products and services to you.਍ഀ * We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to਍ഀ protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.਍ഀ * Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary਍ഀ action.਍ഀ * We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal਍ഀ Information.਍ഀ WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR਍ഀ ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW.਍ഀ Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be਍ഀ disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are਍ഀ required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or਍ഀ criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable਍ഀ privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement,਍ഀ transaction or relationship with you.਍ഀ Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our਍ഀ privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American਍ഀ Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court਍ഀ having jurisdiction thereof.਍ഀ FOM PM.POL.LTG. 1਍ഀ --The applicant, Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by the Mauriello Planning਍ഀ Group, is requesting permission to proceed through the development review process with a਍ഀ proposal to make improvements on town-owned land in conjunction with a proposed਍ഀ redevelopment of the North Day Lot਍ഀ Ruther stated it is the desire of the applicant to apply for a major exterior alteration਍ഀ application and design review application to make improvements on town-owned land,਍ഀ pursuant to the recommendations of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, in਍ഀ conjunction with a proposed redevelopment of the North Day Lot. As a matter of procedure਍ഀ the applicant must first obtain Council (i.e. property owner) approval before proceeding਍ഀ through the town's development review process. Rogers asked if the land was intended to਍ഀ be sold. Ruther said the town would be responsible for any transit solutions occurring on਍ഀ the property. 'We see this as a very acceptable use for town owned land ...This would allow਍ഀ for a better design overall." Newbury moved to allow the applicant to proceed through the਍ഀ development review process with Rogers seconding. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0.਍ഀ For more information, contact Ruther at 479-2145.਍ഀ pan, 2;. 2008 E, 44W No. 4i 21 F,਍ഀ too UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION਍ഀ This form serves to verify Mat the proposed Improvements will not Impact any existing or proposed utllkv ser'vlces, and also to਍ഀ verify service byallablMty and location for new corso'uetlon and should be used In con)mtction with preparing your ulgity plan and਍ഀ scMeduling Installations. A site plan, Inducing grading plan, rloor plan, and elevations, shall be vrbtnMed to the following utilities਍ഀ for approval and veerlfkatlon PLI:ASS ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMVATS FROM THE UITLM਍ഀ COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments WMn that timeframe please contact The Town of Vall.਍ഀ DevNoper to Provide LotAddramInformat/onr ~A ac E L f o! 0 6 3 a Soo 4਍ഀ LotAddresst d OO(> W. J-100CMn g 1R &SubdivislonkV tit Qs0SN6A'b fit LoM ~਍ഀ Authorized Slaniture Comments DIM਍ഀ Sam Today਍ഀ GAS਍ഀ 970A68.1401(fax) .਍ഀ Contact: Rill} SiVW"਍ഀ richard-ldinemsOxcelencray.corn਍ഀ HOLY C'RO$$, tiNEROY਍ഀ 970.947,5471 (tel)਍ഀ 97o,9g5,4081(tax)਍ഀ ContacE:..Dfo'na Galls਍ഀ (fax)਍ഀ U਍ഀ R WATER lit਍ഀ I DMRICIr਍ഀ 970.476.7480 (tei)਍ഀ 970.476.4089 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Fred Hasiee਍ഀ fmstee*0euersd.ora਍ഀ CAMCAST CAOLE਍ഀ 970.418.8248 (W)਍ഀ 970,949,9138 flax)਍ഀ Contact: David Evans਍ഀ daAd਍ഀ NOTES,਍ഀ 1. If the utility 4ppfovat L vtdrkatlan form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments are made dlrettty਍ഀ on the form, or no *coin Is taken within 2 weeks of the Utility's ►ecetpt of the form without explanation the Town will pFesume਍ഀ that there are no problems and the development wti proteed, .਍ഀ 2, if a Utikty company has toncerns•with the proposed oonstrLie tt, the utlllty representative shall role directly on th.4 utility਍ഀ verUleatlon form that tlw.re Is a problem which ne* to be resphied, Thq !site should later be detailed In an attached le. -r.to the਍ഀ Town of Vag, However, please keep In mind that It Is the responsltillity of the utility company and the applicant to resolve਍ഀ Identified problems,.਍ഀ 3. These verifications do not rellet+e the contractor of the respotisblAtY to obtain a Public Way Permit ffotn,lhe Department of਍ഀ Public Wortcs at the Town of Vgll,. Ioaaf [anr mast 6a abtalned hefore dlKala In &V public riflht_M-wall or eakgnent਍ഀ within iheTown of V1111. A bum oi'rm t ts"nota'P c Way aariaitand mus~be ebtitnid ?auratQim.਍ഀ 4, The Developer Is required and i' es to submit'any re*W drawings to the utilities for rc-approval.1kre-yer$Icatbn if the਍ഀ subyiril(ted pfre altered In aty'way after the authorized signature date (unless oUterwlsa specifically noteii within thecomnrent਍ഀ area of ihl਍ഀ Deveiopet's Signature਍ഀ '਍ഀ F'$"*% FORMS%Pemrns%Monrft%DRBIUIIiIy਍ഀ .doe਍ഀ 2 o S਍ഀ //-z Dat਍ഀ 76-4089 ERWSD਍ഀ ill6irtl'i!IILERWSD਍ഀ -kl਍ഀ UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION਍ഀ 12:19:46 24-01-2008 111਍ഀ This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements MR not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to਍ഀ verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in tonJunction with preparing your utility plan and਍ഀ sdhedullirrg Installations. A site plan, incfodN grading ptan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities਍ഀ for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL. OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY਍ഀ COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail.਍ഀ Devefoper to Provide LotAddreu InfWmatfon: ~A E2 c E t t + D ri 3 0 8 ao q-਍ഀ Lot Address 060600 W . wotLCM a CIRgZ.F-S rbd3vision; VAk 4"-T CAb :tip 3 Lots. t਍ഀ Authorized jianaWre Comments Date਍ഀ QWEST਍ഀ 970.468.6360(tel)਍ഀ 970.468.0672(fax)਍ഀ Contacts: Sam Tooley਍ഀ SanwN.[ooky'c~.~,grn r._਍ഀ XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS਍ഀ 970.262.4076 (tel)਍ഀ 970.468.1401 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Rich Slsneres਍ഀ richarL.sjs±erL VxcejWerav.cnm਍ഀ HOLY CROSS ENERGY -਍ഀ 970.947.5471 (ter)਍ഀ 970.945.4081 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Diana Golis਍ഀ XCEL Energy਍ഀ 970.262.4038 (fax)਍ഀ 970.262,4024 (tel)਍ഀ Contacts:਍ഀ KR Bogert਍ഀ KpShr rS@Xir਍ഀ EAGLE RIVER WATER &਍ഀ SANITATION DISTRICT਍ഀ 970.476.7480 (tel)਍ഀ 970.476,40B9 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Fred Haslee਍ഀ COMCAST CABLE਍ഀ 970.416.8248 (tel)਍ഀ 970.949.9138 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: David Evans਍ഀ d;i_vld evagj@obte.corn_0g,M਍ഀ NOTES:਍ഀ 1. If the utility approval & verification form has signatures frwn each of the utility compardes, and no comments are made directly਍ഀ on the form, or no action is taken within 2 weeks of the Utility's receipt of the form without explanation the Town will presume਍ഀ that Owe are no problems and the development can proceed.਍ഀ 2. if a utility company has concerns with the proposed consoi4lon, the utility representative shall note directly on the utility਍ഀ vellcation form that there Is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in an attacl ed letter to the਍ഀ Town of Vad, However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve਍ഀ identified problems.਍ഀ 3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way Permit from the Department of਍ഀ Public Works at the,Town of Vail. Utility locations must be obtai%W before digWnQ In any public right-of-way or easement਍ഀ within the Town of Vail. A building Permit is mt a RuWlc WaY permit and must be obtaimW sepa, rately.਍ഀ 4. Tie Developer Is rewired and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval & re-verification if the਍ഀ submitted pla__nsA~re altered In any way after the authorized signatune date (unless otherwise specifically noted within the comment਍ഀ area of thisofbWi.਍ഀ I~LW-44-0-- I a - //2 -Z਍ഀ Developer's Signature Date਍ഀ F:kKWAFORMWermitsUManningIDRDUJdlityApprava► 0 -07.doc਍ഀ 22/2008਍ഀ TUB 17:15 PAX 9709254106 COMCAST CABLE਍ഀ M0't1.਍ഀ UTXLITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION਍ഀ Taus form saves to verify that the proposed Improvements %41 not impact any existing or proposed udlity serWces, and also to਍ഀ Verify servkz availability and loa tion for new construcWo and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and਍ഀ X'Odulirip installations. A site plan, indudkig grading plan, floor plan, acid edevatiores, stub ba suboditd to the fOpowing udiWe5਍ഀ for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY਍ഀ COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that tlnxaframe please contact The Town of Vars.਍ഀ DeveMper to RhnYde LorAddhm information: PA ee-Z L # -:21010 6 3 0 TOO 4਍ഀ Lot Addrrm. 000600 11%j- 6lordSN.Ee n gigk ,FSubdlvislon: V ft -WIN-THfAb Fie- 3 LoW;_਍ഀ Authorized Sir ii1SIm Commonte Data਍ഀ I਍ഀ QWLVST਍ഀ 970.468.6860(tel)਍ഀ 970.468.0672(fax)਍ഀ CorXwft; Sam Tooky਍ഀ XCEL HIGH PRESSURIE GAS਍ഀ 970.262.4076 (tat)਍ഀ 970.468.1401 (lax)਍ഀ Contact: Rich Sisneros਍ഀ riChArh,~.4~z4.+ruckz!XCk(tihY.[01;,s"11~਍ഀ HOLY CROSS ENERGY਍ഀ 970.947,5471 (td)਍ഀ 970.945.4081 frax)਍ഀ Contact Diana Golic਍ഀ XCEL Energy਍ഀ 970.262.4038 (fax)਍ഀ 970.262.4024 (tel)਍ഀ Contacts;਍ഀ lat Bogert਍ഀ EAGLE RIVER WATER &਍ഀ SANITATION D ST1QdCT਍ഀ 970.476.7480 (td)਍ഀ 970.476.4089 (fax)਍ഀ Contact; Fred Haslee਍ഀ 3ql 3 YtS{1.91Si਍ഀ COMCAST CASU਍ഀ 970.418.8248 (Lei)਍ഀ 970.949.9138 (fax)਍ഀ Contact David Evans਍ഀ gayldg~ ailraMP. _omr.ro~਍ഀ 1 19਍ഀ ®001/001਍ഀ NQTES:਍ഀ 1. If V,! utWW approval & verification form has Signatures fro.-n each of the utility companies, and no eumments are made directly਍ഀ on the form, Or no action is taken wkhin 2 weeks of the Utility's receipt of the form without explanation OW Town will presume਍ഀ that there are no probicros and the development can proceed.਍ഀ 2. V a utdity company has concerns with the proposed construction, the u0bity representative shalt note dlrvWy on die utllity਍ഀ verrfkdWn form that there is a probt rn which nteds to be resolved. The issue should then be detalled In an attached letter to the਍ഀ Town of Vail- However, please keep in mind tMt it is the reWonsib hty of the utility cw Vany and the applicant to resolve਍ഀ identified probkqv;.਍ഀ 3. Theso vLviF*3tioM do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility t0 obtain a Public Way Permit from Lhe OepaArnent of਍ഀ Public Works at the Town O(Vall. Utility WAtions must be obtained before than!. In any public ri9ht•of-way or easement਍ഀ within tuts Town of Vail. A buildirm permit is not a Public Wft permit and Ousk be obtained saparatWy.਍ഀ 4. The Developer iss required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for r"e"al & re-verilfication If the਍ഀ submitted plans a altered in any way after the authorized !;Ignmure date (unless otherwise specifically rioted vrltNn tho comment਍ഀ area oat਍ഀ Developers Slgrwture Date਍ഀ F:Wdp%AFOR"AS1PC.(MKSWUnnkVORBIUtdiry aDpmv:~ CF 7 •G7.ac c਍ഀ kok਍ഀ 1Y#:'.8e 'k-AT,਍ഀ ill .਍ഀ 5 fastrrl 9F fx#'v i#~C Ef fi:t a iIPM V '::0WT- Pf ft.. k i~1 m a!' DfQlpW AM~i 3t+ri i~Q d!s rEp਍ഀ vefy wrvkk aw or IeW.COii?l~l ai 1 ?`pt3td bet} ~d ~1 t kj g Y' d਍ഀ k7 {rAwl Ns. A; ~t਍ഀ fm,਍ഀ S'. Ff yule 4ltuS# i~ lit5 t11fl EGftafim$t:p4!'? dR1Ctr1 p33.4rTBS'rlkittlf਍ഀ teaeiorcr Avt~vdCe t ofid~rres rrffvraitra";`ic L L a i:C 4 $i $਍ഀ tt3 a si►:~:਍ഀ , 1!°4. ,6. A-9.iJ~~dii~~ai~Y.l~l~t:!:,~7s~~~ J~';r..:~.,.~ i~+0►:....._.~...~:.._਍ഀ ®WC-S' T NAS A4.061਍ഀ _ 5'QJ7N r14s_ c7 '~t1lS LQT-਍ഀ ftc਍ഀ Who਍ഀ . fto W"਍ഀ : 9. tWj਍ഀ i5~vidt=mss਍ഀ c਍ഀ Z d Z L L0000091 '-H/ L L : 0 L ' 1S/ 9 L : 0 L 6002 6Z HWr (03M) ZksoeeYOLf fN!lOH1H3/~7 $ 159M0 NOilal਍ഀ SILVERTFURNE FP Fax:19704681401 Feb 11 20th 15:11 P.02਍ഀ UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION਍ഀ 901f~fffd6, .਍ഀ ldwb~ This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to਍ഀ 116, verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and਍ഀ scheduling Installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor pian, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities਍ഀ for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY਍ഀ COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail.਍ഀ Deveioperr to Provide LotAddress Infwmalron. z f v I a/, 3ti F J p਍ഀ Lot Address: 0Cb(-0tD Zia-' -AA਍ഀ _!1 'A-SubdivisionV6 _ I਍ഀ rL3 u**:਍ഀ Authorized Signature਍ഀ QWEST਍ഀ 970.468.6860(tel)਍ഀ 970.468.0672(fax)਍ഀ Contacts: Sam Tooley਍ഀ SamUN,toolgyfgwest.com਍ഀ XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS਍ഀ 970.262.4076 (tel)਍ഀ 970.468.1401 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Mch Sisneros਍ഀ rlchard.sisngEoscalxcelener .com਍ഀ HOLY CROSS ENERGY਍ഀ 970.947.5471 (tel)਍ഀ 970.945.4081 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Diana Golis਍ഀ doolistZho lycross.com਍ഀ XCEL Energy਍ഀ 970.262.4038 (fax)਍ഀ 970,262.4024 (tel)਍ഀ Contacts:਍ഀ Kit Bogert਍ഀ I$athy~DggertQXCEI.EN ERGY.com਍ഀ EAGLE RIVER WATER &਍ഀ SANITATION DISTRICT਍ഀ 970.476.7480 (tel)਍ഀ 970.476.4089 (fax)਍ഀ Contact Fred Haslee਍ഀ fhaslee*erwsd.orq਍ഀ COMCAST CABLE਍ഀ 970.418.8248 (tel)਍ഀ 970.949.9138 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: David Evans਍ഀ davId evansCckable.comcasLcAm_਍ഀ Comments Date਍ഀ NOTE਍ഀ 1. If the utility approval & verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments are made directly਍ഀ on the form, or no action is taken within 2 weeks of the Utility's receipt of the form without explanation the Town will presume਍ഀ that there are no problems and the development can proceed.਍ഀ 2. if a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative shall note directly on the utility਍ഀ verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to the਍ഀ Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve਍ഀ identified problems.਍ഀ 3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way Permit from the department of਍ഀ Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utilby i d befora dogging In any public right-of-way or easement਍ഀ within the Town of Vail, A building permit is not a Public Way germ it and must be obUined seams,਍ഀ 4. The Developer Is required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval & re-verification if the਍ഀ submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date (unless otherwise specifically noted within the comment਍ഀ area of this form).਍ഀ Developer's Signature਍ഀ Date਍ഀ F:\cdev1FORMS\PermitslPianr ing\DR u3 utirty Approval_08.2E1-07. doc਍ഀ UTILITY APPROVAL IN VERIFICATION਍ഀ 11>IIlYrF~ ~f6.:1਍ഀ This form st?tves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to਍ഀ verify service availability and location for new constriction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and਍ഀ sdh &*ng installations. A site plan, Including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shat be subnhitted to the fdkrwing utilities਍ഀ for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY਍ഀ COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe please contact The Town of Vail.਍ഀ i਍ഀ orWoper to Provide tatA&Vm rnirvwab►r. PA itc E l.. * 210104.3637001+਍ഀ I਍ഀ Lot Address: 060600 W. J'Jet! ~ T, Q9",4Subdivision:WA4 Ahu1SNiAb Fla 3 LoW:਍ഀ Autfrodng Slanature Comments at਍ഀ QWEST਍ഀ 970.468.6860(tel)਍ഀ 970.468.0672(fax)਍ഀ Corks-s: Sam Tooley਍ഀ m਍ഀ W=eI-toofey@gqest.co਍ഀ XCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS਍ഀ 970.262.4076 (tel)਍ഀ 970.468.1401 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Rich Sisneros਍ഀ ridhard. si sne ras(bxce leneryy-c.QM਍ഀ HOLY CROSS IINERGY਍ഀ 970.947,5471(tel)਍ഀ 970.945.4081 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Diana Gdis਍ഀ daolisatl*cross.eom਍ഀ XCEL Energy਍ഀ 970.262.4038 (fax)਍ഀ 970.262.4024 (tel)਍ഀ Contacts:਍ഀ 10t Bogert਍ഀ Kathrvn.Boaed6XCELENERGY,com਍ഀ - -਍ഀ EAGLE RIVER WATER It਍ഀ SANITATION DISTRICT਍ഀ 970.476.7480 (tel)਍ഀ 970.476.4089 (fax)਍ഀ Contact: Fred Haslee਍ഀ fhasleefterwsd.oro਍ഀ COMCAST CABLE਍ഀ 970,418.8248 (tel)਍ഀ 970.949.9138 (fax)਍ഀ Contact David Evans਍ഀ david evans6cable.comcast.com਍ഀ L,਍ഀ NOTESe਍ഀ 1. If the utility approval & verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no aonxnents are made directly਍ഀ on the form, or no action Is taken within 2 weeks of the UtNIVS receipt of the form without explanation the Town will presume਍ഀ that there are no problems and the development can proceed.਍ഀ 2. If a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative OW note &ecty on the utility਍ഀ verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The Issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to fine਍ഀ Town of Val. However, please keep in mind that it Is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve਍ഀ identified problems.਍ഀ 3. These ver#'Kations do not relieve the contractor of the responsibiley to obtain a Public Way Permit from the Department of਍ഀ Public Works at the Town of Vail. in any public right-of-way or easement਍ഀ within the Town of Vail.਍ഀ 4. The Developer is required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval & re-tierftation if the਍ഀ submitted pla~~nssyA~re altered In any way after the authorized signature date (unless otherwise spedfically noted wlthm the comment਍ഀ area of th64WA.਍ഀ Gl ,z ~ o s਍ഀ Developer's Signature Date਍ഀ F:IcdovIFORMS1PermtsU4wmkVMRBWbityApprovaL0F -07.d0t਍ഀ • GRoss F਍ഀ O਍ഀ x 3799 HIGHWAY 82 • P.O. BOX 2150਍ഀ GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602਍ഀ 2 (9701945-5,191 • FAX (970) 945-4081਍ഀ O਍ഀ dd T਍ഀ ssodo਍ഀ RECEIVED਍ഀ January 23, 2008 ~ ~U਍ഀ JAN 2 iJ ; L਍ഀ VRDC CONSTRUCTION਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ Attn: Mr. Bill Kennedy਍ഀ PO Box 959਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620-0959਍ഀ Re: Right-of-Way Easement Verification Underground Power Line,਍ഀ Vail Lionshead Filing 3, Lot 1਍ഀ Dear Mr. Kennedy:਍ഀ This letter is in response to the request for utility verification for the proposed North Day Lot਍ഀ improvements.਍ഀ As indicated on our systems map, our underground primary power lines are located along two਍ഀ sides of this proposed Lot 1 improvement. The first underground power line runs parallel to਍ഀ AIRN the north side of the property from the east to the west. The second underground power line਍ഀ runs parallel to the east side of Lot 1.਍ഀ Holy Cross requires that before any excavating is done within a construction site that all utilities਍ഀ will be located by an underground locator, UNCC, to verify the exact location of the buried਍ഀ underground power line. We are requesting the owner to have these locates done before਍ഀ excavation.਍ഀ I have enclosed a systems map showing the locations of our underground power lines within਍ഀ your construction area, which you may find helpful for your construction design and for਍ഀ locating purposes.਍ഀ Holy Cross is also concerned about what type of excavating will be required to avoid coming in਍ഀ contact with our existing underground power lines during construction.਍ഀ If you have any questions concerning our existing underground power lines associated with the਍ഀ construction of this project, please contact our engineering department.਍ഀ Sincerely,਍ഀ HOLY CROSS ENERGY਍ഀ Bob Saathoff,਍ഀ Engineering Department਍ഀ bsaa t~ hoffeholvcross.com਍ഀ (970) 947-5401਍ഀ BS:vw਍ഀ Enclosure਍ഀ • to Z਍ഀ ¢na. w Sao o ° ~i਍ഀ ?l਍ഀ un[Illlllllllllilit I IIIII W111111111 Ifl1t1111111i111111਍ഀ S-Z਍ഀ a਍ഀ • LO0. w w w n਍ഀ r .਍ഀ r it਍ഀ F-ZQ਍ഀ r 7,i{•}71•••7 •iy • .਍ഀ cn r ,•La - .r.. w 77• _ 7:•'•71. 1.=.਍ഀ aL RV਍ഀ v 1 •J~ ` ~ C~.a ~ Iilt=~iil;:j:j~ }=.1~1{Si::.:,•..਍ഀ r~~y~ •਍ഀ ~ R r਍ഀ U} r`-? N਍ഀ 11111111lII111111111਍ഀ ~ ! Illllfllfllf!lllfilflflllilllilllllll I,i;,;.਍ഀ 00਍ഀ •717;S~IiSyy 3 {{S~~I:yL71j';11.,਍ഀ r 7•ye!t+iil~{:1ii=ii'0`7'7{?=iiii:~ 'ii=}i਍ഀ Y ~ ' '''{i}:• i;i.::::: is਍ഀ ~ '•iii{';਍ഀ _ o -਍ഀ vi਍ഀ m rn° ~਍ഀ •U • I I d j਍ഀ ~gU'l~si r ` h ~ ~ oo co਍ഀ r਍ഀ 07 t~ CL਍ഀ • a- o~਍ഀ ' Ilmr~aruiiarrrratrscrrasrac cracr:a਍ഀ ~►~nlta~~ »a► tl~~~~ttitr~l ~~~~1~ • . ~਍ഀ 3਍ഀ Co iS਍ഀ ~ N਍ഀ Z਍ഀ _ 4 [O til਍ഀ Page 1 of 1਍ഀ Warren Campbell - North Day Lot Plans਍ഀ From: "J.Vanderhout@alfamachine.com"਍ഀ To: "Warren Campbell"਍ഀ Date: 03/03/2008 7:13 AM਍ഀ Subject: North Day Lot Plans਍ഀ Warren,਍ഀ Thank you for returning my call on Saturday. Please send the plans to J. Vanderhout਍ഀ Alfa Machine Co.਍ഀ 2425 W. Purdue St.਍ഀ Milwaukee, Wl 53209਍ഀ You may send it collect on our UPS account # W6499X.਍ഀ Thank you e~ Q਍ഀ Jim Vanderhout ~~1 U਍ഀ 3਍ഀ file://CADocuments and Set ings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\47CBA... 03/03/2008਍ഀ 11਍ഀ TOWNOFVAIL .y਍ഀ (਍ഀ THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY਍ഀ PUBLIC NOTICE਍ഀ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the਍ഀ Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with section 12-3-6, Vail Town਍ഀ Code, March 24, 2008, at 1:00 pm in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in਍ഀ consideration of:਍ഀ A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council on a major amendment to਍ഀ Special Development District No. 4, Area A, Vail Cascade, pursuant to Article 12-9A,਍ഀ Special Development District, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Vail਍ഀ Cascade Resort and Spa by enclosing portions of two decks, located at 1300਍ഀ Westhaven Drive/Cascade Village Subdivision, and setting forth details. in regard਍ഀ thereto. (PEC080007)਍ഀ Applicant: L.O. Holding, Inc., represented by JG Johnson Architects਍ഀ Planner: Nicole Peterson਍ഀ A request for a final recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed਍ഀ amendment to the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, pursuant to Section 2.8,਍ഀ Adoption and Amendment of the Master Plan, Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan,਍ഀ to amend those elements of the Master Plan referencing the North Day Lot਍ഀ 00,11 recommendations and requirements to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with an਍ഀ employee housing project, transportation center, and future development site, located at਍ഀ 600 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth਍ഀ details in regard thereto. (PEC080008)਍ഀ Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by the Mauriello਍ഀ Planning Group, LLC਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell/George Ruther਍ഀ A request for final review of a major exterior alteration pursuant to Section 12-71-1-7,਍ഀ Exterior Alterations Or Modifications, and conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-਍ഀ 71-1-3, Permitted And Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level, to allow for the਍ഀ redevelopment of the North Day Lot with a structure containing Type III employee਍ഀ housing units, located at 600 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing਍ഀ 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080009)਍ഀ Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company, represented by the Mauriello਍ഀ Planning Group, LLC਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell/George Ruther਍ഀ A request for final review of a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-71-1-5,਍ഀ Conditional Uses; Generally (On All Levels Of A Building Or Outside Of A Building), Vail਍ഀ Town Code, to facilitate the construction of a public building, grounds, and facilities਍ഀ (transportation center) on the North Day Lot, located at 600 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1,਍ഀ Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080010)਍ഀ Applicant. Town of Vail਍ഀ Planner: Warren Campbell/George Ruther਍ഀ a~e~਍ഀ A request for a final review of a variance from Section 14-3-1, Residential and਍ഀ Commercial Access, Driveway and Parking Standards, Vail Town Code, pursuant to਍ഀ Chapter 12-17, Variances, to allow for a driveway in excess of the maximum allowable਍ഀ grades, located at 660 West Lionshead Circle/ Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 3,਍ഀ and setting forth details in regard thereto. (PEC080011)਍ഀ Applicant: Lion Square Lodge North Condominium Association, represented by਍ഀ Viele Development, LLC਍ഀ Planner: Bill Gibson਍ഀ A request for a final review of a variance from Section 12-21-10, Development਍ഀ Restricted, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 12-17, Variances, to allow for the਍ഀ construction of improvements within slopes equal to or greater than 40%, located at 501਍ഀ North Frontage Road West, Lot 8, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch, and setting forth details in਍ഀ regard thereto. (PEC080012)਍ഀ Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., represented by Gwathmey Pratt Schultz਍ഀ Lindall Architects, P.C.਍ഀ Planner: Scot Hunn਍ഀ The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection਍ഀ during office hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South਍ഀ Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that਍ഀ precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Development Department.਍ഀ Please call 970-479-2138 for additional information.਍ഀ Sign language interpretation is available upon request, with 24-hour notification. Please਍ഀ call 970-479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.਍ഀ Published March 7, 2008, in the Vail Daily.਍ഀ Vail Colorado-Todays information & news from Vail Daily - News਍ഀ ~ Vat- JaUy VAI,~,਍ഀ Skiing Singles- View photo profiles. Local singles਍ഀ into skiing. Join now for free. www.Fitness-Singles.com਍ഀ VAIL DAILY਍ഀ News਍ഀ Search:਍ഀ Go!਍ഀ Page 1 of 5਍ഀ 'GC M/CLOUDY 13°਍ഀ Classifieds I Place an Ad਍ഀ Where will you catch the bus in Lionshe;਍ഀ VR has plan for housing, but questions linger over $14਍ഀ bus station਍ഀ Election 2008਍ഀ Sports਍ഀ Edward Stoner਍ഀ Classifieds਍ഀ Service Directory਍ഀ Vail,, CO Colorado਍ഀ Real Estate਍ഀ March 3, 2008਍ഀ Arts & Entertainment਍ഀ Business਍ഀ 96,Comments J§Print ® Email਍ഀ Columnists਍ഀ Commentary਍ഀ VAIL਍ഀ Colorado - Vail Resorts has਍ഀ Blog਍ഀ ,਍ഀ submitted a plan to build the 120 beds਍ഀ Education਍ഀ Town Talk਍ഀ of worker housing it promised as part਍ഀ Events Calendar਍ഀ of the Arrabelle at Vail Square਍ഀ Letters to the Editor਍ഀ Autos਍ഀ project.਍ഀ Obituaries਍ഀ Our World਍ഀ Photo Galleries਍ഀ The company plans a five-story਍ഀ Special Sections਍ഀ affordable-housing complex on the਍ഀ SEMCES਍ഀ North Da਍ഀ Lot਍ഀ which is now a਍ഀ Submit News਍ഀ y਍ഀ ,਍ഀ Archives਍ഀ parking lot in Lionshead.਍ഀ Business Directory਍ഀ News Feeds਍ഀ Podcasts਍ഀ But there are still some questions਍ഀ Ernail Headlines਍ഀ about what Vail Resort will actually਍ഀ Vail Daily Store਍ഀ Email Newsletter਍ഀ build.਍ഀ Road Conditions਍ഀ Mountain Cams਍ഀ Video Headlines਍ഀ "We think there are some decisions਍ഀ AROUND VAIL਍ഀ " Rob Katz਍ഀ for the town to make਍ഀ Dining਍ഀ ,਍ഀ ,਍ഀ chief executive officer of Broomfield-਍ഀ Shopping਍ഀ Spas਍ഀ based Vail Resorts, said Thursday.਍ഀ Bars & Nightclubs਍ഀ Performing Arts਍ഀ Vail Resorts has਍ഀ submitted plans਍ഀ for a 120-਍ഀ bedroom਍ഀ affordable਍ഀ housing Click to Enl਍ഀ complex with a਍ഀ bus station on Browse Vail Dal਍ഀ the first floor.਍ഀ Special to the Daily਍ഀ Get News Feeds I p pff਍ഀ http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20080303/NEWS/966100408 03/04/2008਍ഀ Vail Colorado-Todays information & news from Vail Daily - News Page 2 of 5਍ഀ Live Music਍ഀ Arts & Culture਍ഀ RECREATION਍ഀ The town has asked Vail Resorts to include a bus station - which th਍ഀ Ski & Snowboard਍ഀ would pay for - in the North Day Lot complex. Vail Resorts include਍ഀ Golf਍ഀ Fishing਍ഀ its proposal, saying it would cost $14.4 million.਍ഀ Mountain Biking਍ഀ Hiking਍ഀ Rafting & Paddling਍ഀ That's "on the high end" of what the town expected to pay, said Gre€਍ഀ And More...਍ഀ Vail's director of public works.਍ഀ TRAVELINFO਍ഀ Lodging਍ഀ Short Term Rentals਍ഀ The town is hoping to use federal grants for part of that cost, and add਍ഀ Transportation਍ഀ funds could come from "tax increment financing."਍ഀ Weather਍ഀ Road Conditions਍ഀ Maps਍ഀ `Keeping our options open'਍ഀ MOUNTAIN `j"INC਍ഀ instead਍ഀ Vail Resorts su਍ഀ ested਍ഀ uttin਍ഀ the bus sto਍ഀ in Ever Vail਍ഀ the਍ഀ Real Estate਍ഀ ,਍ഀ , p਍ഀ g਍ഀ ,਍ഀ gg਍ഀ p਍ഀ Wedding Ideas਍ഀ billion "green village" planned for West Lionshead. That would cost਍ഀ Community਍ഀ company said.਍ഀ Gardening਍ഀ NEWSPAPERS਍ഀ Aspen Times਍ഀ And the affordable housing on the North Day Lot will be ready a lot਍ഀ g Y Y਍ഀ Aspen Times Weekly਍ഀ Citizen Telegram਍ഀ the bus station is put elsewhere, the company wrote in a Feb. 22 lette਍ഀ Grand Junction Free਍ഀ Press਍ഀ Eagle Valley਍ഀ Neighbors of the North Day Lot have objected to the project, particul਍ഀ Enterprise਍ഀ E਍ഀ rpris਍ഀ saying it would be too noisy and smelly.਍ഀ transit hub਍ഀ a਍ഀ La Tribun਍ഀ ,਍ഀ Leadville Chronicle਍ഀ Post Independent਍ഀ But Hall said there needs to be a transit center in Lionshead and Evei਍ഀ Sky Hi Daily News਍ഀ Snowmass Sun਍ഀ not one or the other.਍ഀ Summit Daily਍ഀ The Vail Trail਍ഀ Valley Journal਍ഀ "When you start talking about (Ever Vail) as the only stop for LionsY਍ഀ that's a little ways or people in Lionshead to walk," Hall said.਍ഀ Vail Mayor Dick Cleveland declined to comment on the specifics of਍ഀ proposal, but said Lionshead needs a transit center, and that the coup਍ഀ consider all scenarios.਍ഀ "We're keeping our options open," Cleveland said.਍ഀ A housing saga਍ഀ The $600 million proposal for the Lionshead parking structure incluc਍ഀ transit center. But that plan isn't a done deal. To complicate matters,਍ഀ Resorts has "protective covenants" that give it the final say over whe਍ഀ project - proposed by a Texas development group led by Ross Pero਍ഀ will even happen.਍ഀ http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20080303/NEWS/966100408 03/04/2008਍ഀ Vail Colorado-Todays information & news from Vail Daily - News Page 3 of 5਍ഀ Vail Resorts was given until Feb. 25 to submit a plan for the 120 bed਍ഀ employee housing that it agreed to build for the Arrabelle project. Th਍ഀ must begin by May 2009.਍ഀ In the time leading up to the opening of the Arrabelle, the town of V,,਍ഀ Vail Resorts wrangled over the housing requirements for the $250 m਍ഀ project. Vail Resorts said it was in compliance with the requirements਍ഀ the town said it was not. Vail Resorts ended up posting a $17.3 milli(਍ഀ of credit and agreeing to a timeline to provide the housing.਍ഀ Staff Writer Edward Stoner can be reached at 748-2929 or਍ഀ estoner@vaildaily.com.਍ഀ Latest Comments Post Your Comment I Discussion਍ഀ LATEST COMMENTS਍ഀ Please login to post comments!਍ഀ Email:਍ഀ Password:਍ഀ Remember Me: G਍ഀ M਍ഀ Comments (0)਍ഀ http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20080303/NEWS/966100408 03/04/2008਍ഀ CONCEPTUAL਍ഀ DRAINAGE REPORT਍ഀ NORTH DAY LOT਍ഀ VAIL, COLORADO਍ഀ January 29, 2009਍ഀ D਍ഀ '਍ഀ Prepared for: Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ P.O. Box 959਍ഀ Avon, CO 81620਍ഀ Prepared by: Alpine Engineering, Inc.਍ഀ '਍ഀ P.O. Box 97਍ഀ Edwards, Co 81632਍ഀ (970) 926-3373਍ഀ F਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ TABLE OF CONTENTS਍ഀ 1. Vicinity Map਍ഀ II.਍ഀ Project Description ...............................................................................................1਍ഀ III.਍ഀ Development Site਍ഀ ..........................................................................................1਍ഀ IV.਍ഀ Developed Conditions਍ഀ ..........................................................................................1਍ഀ V.਍ഀ Water Quality਍ഀ ..........................................................................................2਍ഀ VI.਍ഀ Downstream Impact਍ഀ ..........................................................................................2਍ഀ VII.਍ഀ Floodplain਍ഀ ..........................................................................................3਍ഀ VIII.਍ഀ Soils਍ഀ ..........................................................................................3਍ഀ IX. Erosion and Sediment Control....਍ഀ X. Tables:਍ഀ Table 1 - U.S. Soil Conservation Service Soils Summary਍ഀ Table 2 - U.S. Forest Service Soils Summary਍ഀ XI. Exhibits:਍ഀ Exhibit A - FEMA Floodplain Maps਍ഀ Exhibit B - Sediment Control Details਍ഀ XII. Figures:਍ഀ XIII. Maps:਍ഀ Figure 1 - U.S. Soil Conservation Service Soils Map਍ഀ Figure 2 - U.S. Forest Service Soils Map਍ഀ .4਍ഀ Quad Sheet Off-Site Drainage Area਍ഀ Sheet 1 - On-Site Drainage Area Map਍ഀ Sheet 2 - Off-Site Drainage Area Map਍ഀ Sheet 3 - Impervious Area Sand/Oil Separator Drainage Area Map਍ഀ January 29, 2009 North Day Lot Conceptual Drainage਍ഀ 1਍ഀ P਍ഀ b਍ഀ WEST਍ഀ LIONSHEAC>਍ഀ CIRCLE਍ഀ NORTH DAY LOT਍ഀ EAST਍ഀ PROJECT LIONSHEAM਍ഀ SITE ICIRCLE਍ഀ 9 4- . _ VAIL-਍ഀ a 'a਍ഀ d਍ഀ CZ)਍ഀ CF ri਍ഀ ° fl਍ഀ 0਍ഀ po਍ഀ EAa1LE CD਍ഀ BAHN਍ഀ aIONCOLA਍ഀ SCALE 1 " = 400'਍ഀ VICINITY MAP਍ഀ CACR-~~a o਍ഀ CREEK O਍ഀ ~ a ova ~਍ഀ Op 4 ~਍ഀ ROAD਍ഀ CHAIR 8਍ഀ 0 EDO਍ഀ ~;3 4 n਍ഀ 's਍ഀ Q3 ED਍ഀ ~o਍ഀ .pCD UGl d਍ഀ EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 a਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390਍ഀ ~v਍ഀ 1਍ഀ F਍ഀ II. Project Description਍ഀ The North Day Lot project is located in the Lionshead portion of Vail, Colorado਍ഀ on the south side of Interstate 70 (I-70) where the pedestrian overpass crosses I-70 and਍ഀ the South Frontage Road. It is currently developed as a paved parking lot.਍ഀ This report addresses hydrologic conditions for the existing parking lot and the਍ഀ proposed improvements. The surface drainage, watershed characteristics, natural water਍ഀ features and proposed changes and impacts are discussed for the site.਍ഀ III. Development Site਍ഀ The North Day Lot is north of the Core Area/Gondola and adjacent to the South਍ഀ Frontage Road. Gore Creek is approximately 900 feet to the south and should not be਍ഀ impacted by this development. The site is currently an asphalt parking lot. There is very਍ഀ little off-site surface drainage to this site and there are no natural water features present.਍ഀ This site is primarily impervious area that will be replaced with impervious area to਍ഀ construct the proposed improvements.਍ഀ IX. Developed Conditions਍ഀ Proposed for this site is employee housing with associated parking and a skier਍ഀ drop-off area. The hydrologic conditions of this site will not change significantly, since਍ഀ the proposed improvements will be constructed primarily on impervious areas of the site.਍ഀ Stormwater will be conveyed through and off of the site by a series of inlets and pipes.਍ഀ Flow will be directed such that it maintains historic drainage patterns as much as਍ഀ possible. Additional pipes and inlets will be installed to carry runoff from the site.਍ഀ January 29, 2009 North Day Lot Conceptual Drainage਍ഀ I਍ഀ t਍ഀ I਍ഀ N਍ഀ t਍ഀ Proposed storm sewer will tie into existing storm sewer in West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ and existing storm sewer in the corridor east of the Landmark Tower. The drainage basin਍ഀ that currently flows from the Red Sandstone School area under I-70 and under the South਍ഀ Frontage Road to a westerly flowing ditch south of the South Frontage Road will਍ഀ maintain its current flow direction and continue west along the South Frontage road.਍ഀ V. Water Quality਍ഀ There will be no significant increase in impervious areas as a result of the਍ഀ proposed development. The North Day Lot site was included in the sizing of sand/oil਍ഀ separators constructed with the Arrabelle project. This is documented in the drainage਍ഀ report prepared by Alpine Engineering, Inc. entitled "Proposed Storm Pipe Capacities,਍ഀ Lionshead Core, Vail, Colorado, updated April 7, 2005. The "Sand/Oil Separator West"਍ഀ was constructed between the Antlers Condominiums and the LionSquare Lodge. The਍ഀ limits of the contributing impervious area to the west sand/oil separator may be found on਍ഀ Sheet 3 of the maps. Therefore, water quality for the North Day Lot will be taken care of਍ഀ by the existing Lionshead Core water quality vaults.਍ഀ VI. Downstream Impact਍ഀ There is a storm drain system in place between the proposed development and਍ഀ Gore Creek. This storm drain system was evaluated for flows from the existing North਍ഀ Day Lot during the storm sewer design for Arabelle. Since impervious areas are the same਍ഀ for the proposed North Day Lot, the storm sewer system that carries runoff to Gore Creek਍ഀ has the capacity to carry the flows from the proposed development. Detention is not਍ഀ January 29, 2009 North Day Lot Conceptual Drainage਍ഀ 2਍ഀ F਍ഀ t਍ഀ recommended because of the negligible increase in peak flow that the proposed਍ഀ development will have on the peak runoff from the existing impervious site.਍ഀ VII. Floodplain਍ഀ There is no floodplain encroaching upon the North Day Lot development site. A਍ഀ copy of the FEMA floodplain panel in the Lionshead area may be found in Exhibit A.਍ഀ VIII. Soils਍ഀ In order to assess hydrologic conditions at the development site, actual soil types਍ഀ were obtained from the "Soil Survey of Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle,਍ഀ Garfield and Pitkin Counties" prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil਍ഀ Conservation Service and the "Draft Soil Survey of the Holy Cross Soil Survey - White਍ഀ River and Arapaho National Forests, Colorado - Parts of Eagle, Garfield, Mesa, Pitkin਍ഀ and Summit Counties" prepared by the U.S. Forest Service. There are four hydrologic਍ഀ soil groups (A, B, C or D) that soils may be classified into as a means of estimating਍ഀ runoff from precipitation. They are grouped according to their runoff - producing਍ഀ characteristics from long-duration storms. Please refer to Figures 1 and 2 for Soils Maps਍ഀ and Tables 1 and 2 for soil names and hydrologic soils groups.਍ഀ deep or deep, moderately well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to਍ഀ Group B soils have a moderate infiltration rate and consist mainly of moderately਍ഀ moderately course texture. Made Land (ML) is man-made material, including buildings,਍ഀ pavement, fill and other disturbed areas. It has been assumed that the hydrologic soils਍ഀ January 29, 2009 North Day Lot Conceptual Drainage਍ഀ 3਍ഀ 1਍ഀ ~v਍ഀ i਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ F਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ group for Made Land is similar to that of the adjacent soils. The North Day Lot consists਍ഀ of Made Land.਍ഀ IX. Erosion and Sediment Control਍ഀ A sediment control plan will be prepared for the project to limit the transportation਍ഀ of sediments to Gore Creek and its tributaries during construction. Devices that may be਍ഀ used during construction to prevent sediment-laden runoff from leaving the site may਍ഀ include stabilized construction entrances, silt fence, straw bales, stone outlet structures,਍ഀ sediment traps, silt sacks and removable pump stations. Details of these devices may be਍ഀ found in Exhibit B.਍ഀ January 29, 2009 North Day Lot Conceptual Drainage 4਍ഀ 1਍ഀ i਍ഀ i-਍ഀ 7਍ഀ t਍ഀ TABLES਍ഀ 1਍ഀ TABLE 1਍ഀ U.S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOILS SUMMARY਍ഀ C~਍ഀ i਍ഀ N਍ഀ Map Symbol਍ഀ Soil Name਍ഀ Hydrologic Soil Group਍ഀ 45਍ഀ Forsey਍ഀ B਍ഀ TABLE 2਍ഀ U.S. FOREST SERVICE SOILS SUMMARY਍ഀ Map Symbol਍ഀ Soil Name਍ഀ Hydrologic Soil Group਍ഀ 281B਍ഀ Quander Family਍ഀ B਍ഀ B (based upon adjacent਍ഀ ML਍ഀ Made Land਍ഀ soils)਍ഀ 1~਍ഀ EXHIBIT A਍ഀ ' FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP਍ഀ F਍ഀ ;jJ jj j i did j ! 3਍ഀ 6਍ഀ a d~`~~ # i6 "Jill਍ഀ f d{ f d;~jd d d z ~ f~ o i਍ഀ ' ~ Z 3 4 7 $ S f* e I F o਍ഀ EIdd 331 3 3 IE73 ~31~ 0i II!਍ഀ a਍ഀ E f਍ഀ 33 ir!਍ഀ fii:338਍ഀ ?t~l਍ഀ !I!਍ഀ pgpg਍ഀ Y ~਍ഀ I਍ഀ .g਍ഀ I ill਍ഀ ~ - o°j਍ഀ R @਍ഀ b ~਍ഀ 3 I਍ഀ ਍ഀ i਍ഀ 3਍ഀ I਍ഀ Y਍ഀ j py6 a Y਍ഀ ~I ~਍ഀ d .਍ഀ I਍ഀ F e3਍ഀ Z I਍ഀ 33{- ~ P.਍ഀ I$਍ഀ ® R F p e਍ഀ Y਍ഀ 9~ Y ~ of ~਍ഀ L ~ I .ua਍ഀ pwo' ~਍ഀ ~ d p ~ I A਍ഀ g਍ഀ e2 .~W $ ~ di਍ഀ p ~ ~ I਍ഀ F਍ഀ i਍ഀ tY਍ഀ I f-਍ഀ `3' ~~d1 3 53;y3#~ {d{{~rp pppp ~.`3 ~ E as j i {iE y a{ F~ i•pp਍ഀ d 3g~a f tt d >8t o f ^$S i p a)@ pF f giY d~ 3. HT਍ഀ ep {,.gdE { gg€$~ ee #p 3~$ p j6 23 }jf { 42਍ഀ aag?f~` i.~I#{ ~g 1,11hp਍ഀ 0 2 f 7g! ! En 3 ~ ~ g I~ F਍ഀ ~ Ef!;~਍ഀ w 4~$f! ljE ~af E~E fill 2 g$ s3 s#E 355 i 3 [313਍ഀ z -,Ill IM 111.1 i111d=E i਍ഀ it a j if਍ഀ ffy }5jgg fill,਍ഀ 3$C f ; ~i lgqdsat ~ s @E j it I '਍ഀ 31~~ l~~~33~ ! #!°~#l#~; 83 e~~ 5$ sE਍ഀ dill efEd$ ; i 36'33 4 3 11 oil 4 ee $~E 11!! j Ft Ill- SR 5$ ;ti ~i#;਍ഀ 1਍ഀ t EXHIBIT B਍ഀ SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS਍ഀ faloo਍ഀ 7਍ഀ 50' Min. 4+਍ഀ 00਍ഀ Earth Mountable Berm (Optional) x 3' [.0- 10' E਍ഀ MIRAFI 140N Filter Cloth in N 5 w a਍ഀ PIN *41'* WX 44h਍ഀ SEC 10 Edge of Pavement਍ഀ 50' Min.਍ഀ 10'਍ഀ Min.਍ഀ Existing Ground਍ഀ U਍ഀ Al .਍ഀ 00 00-1z)v਍ഀ 2" Crushed Sceened Rock 6~ 100 00-o਍ഀ o਍ഀ C~o cv~ 006਍ഀ o਍ഀ 0002 0002 Cfb O O਍ഀ 21਍ഀ Existing Ground o਍ഀ ਍ഀ PLAN਍ഀ STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE਍ഀ CONSTRUCTION NOTES Scale: 1" = 10'-0"਍ഀ 1. STONE SIZE - USE 2" CRUSHED SCREENED ROCK.਍ഀ 2. LENGTH - AS REQUIRED, BUT NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET.਍ഀ 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES.਍ഀ 4. WIDTH - TEN (10) FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS਍ഀ OR EGRESS OCCURS.਍ഀ 5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.਍ഀ 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES਍ഀ SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1਍ഀ SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED.਍ഀ 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING਍ഀ OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING਍ഀ WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES਍ഀ USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC਍ഀ RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. SCE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PAVING OF ENTRANCE਍ഀ COMMENCES.਍ഀ 8. WASHING - WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC਍ഀ RIGHTS-OF-WAY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH਍ഀ STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE.਍ഀ 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN.਍ഀ 77਍ഀ EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ 0 EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632 f਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390਍ഀ 1਍ഀ N਍ഀ b਍ഀ ♦ ' j f਍ഀ FLOW਍ഀ FLOW਍ഀ 36" MINIMUM FENCE਍ഀ POST LENGTH਍ഀ FILTER਍ഀ CLOTH਍ഀ 36" MINIMUM LENGTH FENCE POST,਍ഀ DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 16" INTO਍ഀ GROUND਍ഀ 16" MINIMUM HEIGHT OF਍ഀ GEOTEXTiLE CLASS F਍ഀ 8" MINIMUM DEPTH IN਍ഀ GROUND਍ഀ FENCE POST SECTION਍ഀ MINIMUM 20" ABOVE਍ഀ GROUND FLOW਍ഀ UNDISTURBED਍ഀ GROUND਍ഀ EMBED GEOTEXTiLE CLASS F਍ഀ -਍ഀ _..".11.,.,,',11਍ഀ A MINIMUM OF 8" VERTICALLY਍ഀ INTO THE GROUND਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ FENCE POST DRIVEN A਍ഀ MINIMUM OF 16" INTO਍ഀ CROSS਍ഀ THE GROUND਍ഀ SECTION਍ഀ POSTS਍ഀ SECTION B਍ഀ SECTION A਍ഀ STAPLE਍ഀ STAPLE਍ഀ JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT FENCE SECTIONS਍ഀ (TOP VIEW)਍ഀ 1. Fence posts shall be a minimum of 36" long driven 16" minimum into the਍ഀ ground. Wood posts shall be 11/2" x 11/2" square (minimum) cut, or 13/4" dia.਍ഀ (minimum) round and shall be of sound quality hardwood. Steel posts will be਍ഀ standard T or U section weighting not less than 1.00 pond per linear foot.਍ഀ 2. Geotextile shall be fastened securely to each fence post with wire ties਍ഀ or staples at top and midsection and shall meet the following requirements਍ഀ for Geotextile Class F:਍ഀ Tensile Strength 50 Ibs/in (min.) Test: MSMT 509਍ഀ Tensile Modulus 20 Ibs/in (min.) Test: MSMT 509਍ഀ Flow Rate 0.3 gal ft / minute (max.) Test: MSMT 322਍ഀ Filtering Efficiency 75% (min.) Test: MSMT 322਍ഀ 3. Where ends of geotextile fabric come together, they shall be overlapped,਍ഀ folded and stapled to prevent sediment bypass.਍ഀ 4. Silt Fence shall be inspected after each rainfall event and maintained when਍ഀ bulges occur or when sediment accumulation reached 50% of the fabric height.਍ഀ SILT FENCE DETAIL਍ഀ EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632਍ഀ 26-3390 r਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390-਍ഀ 10' MAXIMUM CENTER TO਍ഀ 10'਍ഀ CENTER਍ഀ 0਍ഀ N਍ഀ u਍ഀ [1਍ഀ STANDARD SYMBOL਍ഀ SBD਍ഀ FLOW਍ഀ .1. %1. ♦f . r Lr%+਍ഀ 4" VERTICAL FACE਍ഀ BEDDING DETAIL਍ഀ ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARD਍ഀ PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE਍ഀ FLOW ' %IF਍ഀ , v+਍ഀ ~~`t~ mil; ~ `1C►਍ഀ S~਍ഀ t w਍ഀ rr਍ഀ BOUND BALES PLACED ON਍ഀ CONTOUR਍ഀ 2 RE-BARS, STEEL PICKETS, OR 2"x2" STAKES਍ഀ 1 1/2' TO 2' IN GROUND, DRIVE STAKES਍ഀ FLUSH NTH BALES.਍ഀ ANCHORING DETAIL਍ഀ CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS਍ഀ 1. BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR AND IN A ROW਍ഀ WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES.਍ഀ 2. EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF (4) INCHES, AND PLACED਍ഀ SO THE BINDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL.਍ഀ 3. BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES OR RE-BARS਍ഀ DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL BE DRIVEN਍ഀ TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE TO FORCE THE BALES TOGETHER.਍ഀ STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE BALE.਍ഀ 4. INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE PROMPTLY਍ഀ AS NEEDED BY THE CONTRACTOR.਍ഀ 5. BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULNESS SO AS NOT TO਍ഀ BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE.਍ഀ STRAW BALE DIKE਍ഀ EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 1਍ഀ P਍ഀ ti਍ഀ /r FLOW it it FLOW਍ഀ EARTH DIKE STONE਍ഀ p p0਍ഀ O p਍ഀ p p IN.਍ഀ p਍ഀ O p C~ p 0%਍ഀ ~t਍ഀ 6" MIN. ~ LEVEL CREST ~ L=6' ~ 2' MIN.਍ഀ CU C' CP C~o 2"x10"x12'਍ഀ BAFFLE BOARD਍ഀ 12" MIN. ~j਍ഀ 6" MIN.਍ഀ 0000 000਍ഀ 4" MIN. GROUND LINE਍ഀ STONE EMBEDDED਍ഀ PROFILE਍ഀ STANDARD SYMBOL NNOCom਍ഀ CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS਍ഀ 1. THE STONE SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE. GRAVEL MAY BE USED IF CRUSHED STONE IS NOT AVAILABEL.਍ഀ THE STONE SHALL MEET AASHTO DESIGNATION M43 SIZE NO. 2 OR 24.਍ഀ 2. THE CREST OF THE STONE DIKE SHALL BE AT LEAST SIX INCHES LOWER THAN THE LOWEST ELEVATION਍ഀ OF THE TOP OF THE EARTH DIKE AND AND SHALL BE LEVEL.਍ഀ 3. THE STONE OUTLET STRUCTURE SHALL BE EMBEDDED INTO THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF FOUR INCHES.਍ഀ 4. THE MINIMUM LENGTH, IN FEET, OF THE CREST OF THE STONE OUTLET STRUCTURE SHALL BE SIX.਍ഀ 5. THE STONE OUTLET STRUCTURE SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAIN, AND THE STONE SHALL BE਍ഀ REPLACED WHEN THE STRUCTURE CEASES TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED DUE TO SILT ACCUMULATION਍ഀ AMONG THE STONE, WASHOUT, CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC DAMAGE, ETC.਍ഀ 6. THE BAFFLE BOARD SHALL BE EXTENDED ONE FOOT INTO THE DIKE, STAKED AND EMBEDDED 4 INCHES਍ഀ INTO EXISTING GROUND.਍ഀ STONE OUTLET STRUCTURE਍ഀ EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O, BOX 97਍ഀ imi EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390਍ഀ ti਍ഀ 1਍ഀ lp਍ഀ lk਍ഀ 2' STONE--,,.,਍ഀ 4f਍ഀ SMALL਍ഀ RIPRAP਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 11' MIN. 1' MIN. r਍ഀ L-4xD.A. 4r UNDISTURBED AREA਍ഀ J1਍ഀ in 1' M~A~X. ~ ~਍ഀ L.ROFILE਍ഀ 7 FLOW਍ഀ 2' STONE਍ഀ (OPTIONAL).਍ഀ SMALL RIPRAP਍ഀ 2਍ഀ '11਍ഀ FILTER CLOTH਍ഀ EXCAVATE FOR REWIRED STORAGE਍ഀ OPTION: A ONE FOOT LAYER OF 2" STONE MAY BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE RIPRAP IN਍ഀ PLACE OF THE EMBEDDED FILTER CLOTH.਍ഀ CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS਍ഀ 1. AREA UNDER EMBANKMENT SHALL BE CLEARED, GRUBBED AND STRIPPED OF ANY VEGETATION AND ROOT਍ഀ MAT. THE POOL AREA SHALL BE CLEARED.਍ഀ 2. THE FILL MATERIAL FOR THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE FREE OF ROOTS AND OTHER WOODY VEGETATION AS਍ഀ WELL AS OVER-SIZED STONES, ROCKS, ORGANIC MATERIAL OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. THE਍ഀ EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED BY TRAVERSING WITH EQUIPMENT WHILE IT IS BEING CONSTRUCTED.਍ഀ 3. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 2:1 OR FLATTER.਍ഀ 4. THE STONE USED IN THE OUTLET SHALL BE SMALL RIPRAP 4"-8" ALONG WITH A 1' THICKNESS OF 2"਍ഀ AGGREGATE PLACED ON THE UP-GRADE SIDE ON THE SMALL RIPRAP OR EMBEDDED FILTER CLOTH IN THE਍ഀ RIPRAP.਍ഀ 5. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRAP RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS WHEN THE SEDIMENT਍ഀ HAS ACCUMULATED TO 1/2 THE DESIGN DEPTH OF THE TRAP.਍ഀ 6. THE STRUCTURE SHALLL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAIN AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED.਍ഀ 7. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT EROSION AND WATER਍ഀ POLLUTION IS MINIMIZED.਍ഀ 8. THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE AREA STABILIZED WHEN THE DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN਍ഀ PROPERLY STABILIZED.਍ഀ SEDIMENT TRAP EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390਍ഀ f~਍ഀ t਍ഀ 2 EAC਍ഀ DUMP STRAP਍ഀ EXPANSION RESTR,਍ഀ (1/4" NYLON R(਍ഀ 2" FLAT WASH[਍ഀ INSTALLATION DETAIL਍ഀ DUMP STRAP਍ഀ 1" REBAR FOR BAG਍ഀ REMOVAL FROM INLET਍ഀ SILTSACK -਍ഀ 14਍ഀ OPTIONAL METAL HANGING਍ഀ FRAME FOR TRAFFIC /਍ഀ CONDITIONS਍ഀ SILT SACK਍ഀ BAG DETAIL਍ഀ EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ - EDWARDS, COLORADO 81632਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390 a਍ഀ DUMP STRAP਍ഀ 1਍ഀ fl਍ഀ I਍ഀ REMOVABLE PUMPING STATION਍ഀ OOK AND CHAIN FOR REMOVAL਍ഀ Perforated (removable)਍ഀ 12' - 36' pipe wrapped w/ 1/2'਍ഀ hardware cloth and Geotextile਍ഀ Class 'C'਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ ANTICIPATED WATER o 0 0 0 3' MIN.਍ഀ SURFACE ELEV. 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0 4 LEAN 0 0 0 `CLEAN GRAVEL਍ഀ 0 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 0 0 0਍ഀ 0 o PERFORATED 48' PIPE਍ഀ WRAPPED WITH 112'਍ഀ 0 o HARDWARE CLOTH਍ഀ WEIGHT AS NECESSARY 0਍ഀ TO PREVENT FLOATATIO਍ഀ OF CENTER PIPE਍ഀ 8' min.਍ഀ Construction Specifications਍ഀ 1. The outer pipe should be 48' dia, or shall, in any case, be at least 4' grester਍ഀ in diameter than the center pipe, The outer pipe shall be wrapped with 112' hardware਍ഀ cloth to prevent backflll material from entering the perforations.਍ഀ 2. After installing the outer pipe, backfill around outer pipe with 2' aggregate਍ഀ or clean gravel.਍ഀ 3. The inside stand pipe (center ipe) should be constructed by perforating a਍ഀ corrugated or PVC pipe between 12' and 36' in diameter, The perforations shall਍ഀ be 1/2' X 6' slits or 1' diameter holes 6' on center. The center pipe shall be਍ഀ wrapped with 112' hardware cloth first, then wrapped again with Geotextile Class C.਍ഀ 4. The center pipe should extend 12' to 18' above the anticipated water surface਍ഀ elevation or riser crest elevation when dewatering a basin. AM਍ഀ r~਍ഀ .WARDS 13tJ 5 CENTER P.O. BOX 97਍ഀ i EDWARDS. COLORADO 81632 •਍ഀ (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390਍ഀ 4਍ഀ i਍ഀ r਍ഀ f਍ഀ Is਍ഀ I਍ഀ 1m਍ഀ FIGURES਍ഀ i਍ഀ kw਍ഀ p._਍ഀ ~I਍ഀ F਍ഀ IP਍ഀ ~f਍ഀ SCALE: 1 2000'਍ഀ Figure 1 - U.S. Soil Conservation Service Soils Map਍ഀ SHEET NO. 13਍ഀ SOIL SURVEY OF ASPEN-GYPSUM AREA, COLORADO,਍ഀ PARTS OF EAGLE, GARFIN LD, AND PITKIN COUNTIES਍ഀ (EDWARI)N ADRANGLE)਍ഀ n਍ഀ C਍ഀ IP਍ഀ N਍ഀ SCALE: 1 2000'਍ഀ Figure 2 - U.S. Forest Service Soils Mar਍ഀ 4਍ഀ i਍ഀ m਍ഀ m਍ഀ IP਍ഀ m਍ഀ I਍ഀ MAPS਍ഀ ~E਍ഀ ■਍ഀ Traffic Impact Study਍ഀ North Day Lot Redevelopmen਍ഀ Prepared for:਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ ® Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 2009਍ഀ Kimley-Hom਍ഀ and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y਍ഀ J਍ഀ North Da Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ Vail, Colorado਍ഀ Prepared for਍ഀ Vail Resorts Development Company਍ഀ 137 Benchmark Road਍ഀ PO Box 959਍ഀ Avon, Colorado 81620਍ഀ Prepared by਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 950 Seventeenth Street਍ഀ Suite 1050਍ഀ Denver, Colorado 80202 *110'v •D਍ഀ m਍ഀ (303) 228-2300 9(303) 446-8678 FAX 3,6355਍ഀ 7.11਍ഀ January 2009਍ഀ This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is਍ഀ intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper਍ഀ reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates,਍ഀ Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ TABLE OF CONTENTS਍ഀ TABLE OF CONTENTS i਍ഀ APPENDICES਍ഀ i਍ഀ LIST OF TABLES਍ഀ ii਍ഀ LIST OF FIGURES਍ഀ ii਍ഀ 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY਍ഀ 1਍ഀ 2.0 INTRODUCTION਍ഀ 6਍ഀ 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS਍ഀ 8਍ഀ 3.1 Existing Roadway Network਍ഀ . 8਍ഀ 3.2 Existing Study Area਍ഀ 8਍ഀ 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes਍ഀ 8਍ഀ 3.4 Long Term Future Roadway Network਍ഀ 11਍ഀ 3.5 Future Traffic Volumes਍ഀ 13਍ഀ 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS਍ഀ 16਍ഀ 4.1 Trip Generation਍ഀ 16਍ഀ 4.2 Trip Distribution਍ഀ 18਍ഀ 4.3 Traffic Assignment and Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic਍ഀ 21਍ഀ 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS਍ഀ 25਍ഀ 5.1 Analysis Methodology਍ഀ 25਍ഀ 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis.~਍ഀ 26਍ഀ 5.3 Auxiliary Turn Lane Recommendations਍ഀ 30਍ഀ 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS਍ഀ 32਍ഀ APPENDICES਍ഀ Appendix A - Conceptual Site Plan਍ഀ Appendix B - 2006 Counts from FHU Study਍ഀ Appendix C - Trip Generation Worksheets਍ഀ Appendix D - Synchro Intersection Analysis Worksheets਍ഀ Appendix E - Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculations਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094.0021 North Day Lot Redevelopment page i਍ഀ LIST OF TABLES਍ഀ Table 1- North Day Lot Development Trip Generation ....................................................................18਍ഀ Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions 25਍ഀ Table 3 - SFR & West Lionshead Circle (East Intersection) LOS Results 28਍ഀ Table 4 - West Lionshead Circle & Project Access Driveway LOS Results 29਍ഀ LIST OF FIGURES਍ഀ Figure 1- Vicinity Map 7਍ഀ Figure 2 - Existing Key Intersections and Project Access Locations 9਍ഀ Figure 3 - 2006 Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................10਍ഀ Figure 4 - Future Lanes and Control ....................................................................................................12਍ഀ Figure 5 - 2010 Future Traffic Volume Projections .............................................................................14਍ഀ Figure 6 - 2030 Future Traffic Volume Projections .............................................................................15਍ഀ Figure 7 - Employee Housing Trip Distribution ................................................................................19਍ഀ Figure 8 - Skier Drop-off/Pick-up Trip Distribution 20਍ഀ Figure 9 - Total Traffic Assignment 22਍ഀ Figure 10 - 2010 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes 23਍ഀ Figure 11- 2030 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes 24਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094.0021North Dmj Lot Redevelopment Page ii਍ഀ 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY਍ഀ A redevelopment is currently proposed at the North Day Lot in Vail, Colorado. The North Day਍ഀ Lot is located along the south side of South Frontage Road, just east of the eastern West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle intersection within the Lionshead Village area. This parking lot currently਍ഀ provides 105 parking spaces for Vail Resorts' employees. Redevelopment of this site is਍ഀ anticipated to include employee housing and skier pick-up and drop-off. The redevelopment is਍ഀ anticipated to be completed within the next couple of years. Analysis has therefore been਍ഀ completed for the 2010 short-term horizon, as well as the long term 2030 horizon.਍ഀ The project is proposed to include employee housing units on the east side of the site. The west਍ഀ end of the site is anticipated to accommodate nine (9) parking spaces for skier pick-up/drop-off.਍ഀ The employee housing is anticipated to consist of a mixture of 2 bedroom, 3 bedroom, and 4਍ഀ bedroom dwelling units to accommodate up to 124 beds/ people.਍ഀ The purpose of this study is to identify project traffic generation characteristics, to identify਍ഀ potential project traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation਍ഀ measures required for identified impacts. Specifically, this traffic impact study has been਍ഀ prepared in accordance with CDOT requirements to include an evaluation of the existing traffic਍ഀ conditions at the key intersections, as well as an evaluation of the short-term (2010) horizon.਍ഀ The intersection of South Frontage Road and eastern West Lionshead Circle intersection along਍ഀ with the proposed project access along West Lionshead Circle have been included for਍ഀ evaluation in this study.਍ഀ Regional access to the Lionshead area is provided by I-70. Primary access to the site is provided਍ഀ by the South Frontage Road. Direct access to the project site will continue to be from one access਍ഀ driveway along West Lionshead Circle. Access to the project site is currently provided from਍ഀ this full movement access driveway approximately 65 feet south of South Frontage Road along਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 1਍ഀ Site specific traffic from the future North Day Lot (including the skier drop-off and pick-up, a਍ഀ public use relocated from Lionshead Place and replacing the illegal skier drop-off/pick-up that਍ഀ occurs on East Lionshead Circle) is expected to be approximately 115 trips during the morning਍ഀ peak hour and 118 trips during the afternoon peak hour.. Accounting for the existing parking਍ഀ lot traffic generated today that will be relocated to another area of Town, the site, with the਍ഀ public skier drop-off/pick-up, is anticipated to add 41 trips during the morning peak hour and਍ഀ 44 trips during the afternoon peak hour. It is important to note that the majority of the skier਍ഀ pick-up and drop-off trips are existing relocated trips from other locations where it was਍ഀ previously occurring within the Town (Lionshead Place and East Lionshead Circle), and the਍ഀ remainder are new trips generated by convenience and enhancements provided at this new਍ഀ location. The employee housing unit trip generation is anticipated to be 7 AM and 10 PM peak਍ഀ hour trips, which represents the actual amount of new traffic generated by the housing project.਍ഀ Distribution of site traffic on the street system ' was based on the area street system਍ഀ characteristics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the਍ഀ proposed access system for the project. This distribution was developed in accordance with਍ഀ recommendations provided by Town of Vail staff and includes the possible future Simba Run਍ഀ underpass of Interstate 70 (I-70). Assignment of project traffic was based upon the trip਍ഀ generation described previously and the distributions developed.਍ഀ Based on the analysis presented, it is believed that the proposed North Day Lot redevelopment਍ഀ project will be successfully incorporated into the future roadway network. The proposed project਍ഀ development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following recommendations:਍ഀ • According to the Lionshead Village Transportation Plan Update, South Frontage Road is਍ഀ anticipated to be widened along project frontage to include one through lane in each਍ഀ direction with continuous eastbound and westbound acceleration/ deceleration lanes.਍ഀ According to the Access Code, deceleration lanes are generally required. However,਍ഀ acceleration lanes are not warranted along South Frontage Road due to the existing 25 mile਍ഀ per hour posted speed limit. Based on recommendations included in the Lionshead Village਍ഀ Transportation Plan Update, acceleration lanes will be constructed to provide continuous਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 2਍ഀ J਍ഀ acceleration/ deceleration lanes along South Frontage Road adjacent to project frontage. In਍ഀ addition, along the north side of South Frontage Road, a bike lane is proposed. It is਍ഀ anticipated that these Frontage Road improvements will be constructed by the Town in one਍ഀ project for the limits from Ever Vail to the Town of Vail Community Development,਍ഀ sometime after the North Day Lot redevelopment project is completed.਍ഀ • Through lane transitions for eastbound and westbound traffic around the proposed left turn਍ഀ lanes along the South Frontage Road are recommended to be constructed in accordance਍ഀ with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Since the speed limit of਍ഀ South Frontage Road is 25 miles per hour, the through lane transition lengths will follow the਍ഀ equation L=(W X S^2)/60, where L is the length of transition, W is the lateral offset, and S is਍ഀ the speed in miles per hour.਍ഀ • All improvements along South Frontage Road are recommended to be designed per the਍ഀ CDOT State Highway Access Code for category F-R roadways with a 25 mile per hour਍ഀ speed limit.਍ഀ • The North Day Lot redevelopment project including the additional traffic generated from਍ഀ the skier drop-off/pick-up is not anticipated to increase traffic on the West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ leg at the South Frontage Road by more than 20 percent. Therefore, it is believed that a਍ഀ CDOT Access Permit will not be required for the project.਍ഀ • Auxiliary turn lane requirements for the West Lionshead Circle and South Frontage Road਍ഀ intersection have been identified. These turn lane improvements are warranted based on਍ഀ existing traffic conditions. It is recommended that when the Frontage Road improvements਍ഀ are constructed, the following turn lanes be included in the design:਍ഀ o According to the Access Code, an eastbound to southbound right turn਍ഀ deceleration lane is warranted based on existing traffic at the intersection of West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road. Per the Code, this lane should਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 3਍ഀ provide 110 feet of storage with a 7.5 to 1 taper to accommodate future 2030਍ഀ traffic volumes.਍ഀ o According to the Access Code, a westbound to southbound left turn deceleration਍ഀ lane is warranted based on existing traffic at the West Lionshead Circle & South਍ഀ Frontage Road intersection. According to the Code, this left turn deceleration਍ഀ lane is recommended to provide 200 feet of storage plus a 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ o A right turn acceleration lane along eastbound South Frontage Road is not਍ഀ warranted based upon the Access Code. However, based upon the Lionshead਍ഀ Master Plan recommendations, a right turn acceleration lane is recommended to਍ഀ be constructed for a length of 90 feet plus a 7.5 to 1 taper. This right turn਍ഀ acceleration lane will reduce the possible vehicle queue along the northbound਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle approach to the intersection.਍ഀ o To allow for acceptable level of service for left turns onto South Frontage Road਍ഀ from West Lionshead Circle, a westbound left turn acceleration lane is਍ഀ recommended to be constructed. This left turn acceleration lane is recommended਍ഀ to be constructed for a length of 90 feet plus a 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ • It is recommended that separate left turn and right turn lanes be provided along the਍ഀ northbound approach of West Lionshead Circle to South Frontage Road. This approach਍ഀ shall operate with stop-control and be posted with an R1-1 "STOP" sign.਍ഀ • To avoid the potential of conflicts created by vehicles queuing exiting the site at the project਍ഀ driveway along West Lionshead Circle, it is recommended that a minimum throat depth of਍ഀ 50 feet be provided prior to the first skier drop-off/pick-up parking space.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 4਍ഀ • It is recommended that the proposed access driveway approach to West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ operate with stop control. A "STOP" (R1-1) sign should be placed along this approach਍ഀ according to guidance provided in the MUTCD.਍ഀ • Northbound West Lionshead Circle is recommended to be posted with a R10-7 "DO NOT਍ഀ BLOCK INTERSECTION" sign prior to the site access.਍ഀ • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the਍ഀ Civil Drawings, and conform to Town of Vail and CDOT standards, as well as the Manual਍ഀ on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - 2003 Edition (MUTCD).਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 5਍ഀ r਍ഀ 2.0 INTRODUCTION਍ഀ Kinley-Horn has prepared this report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of਍ഀ future traffic conditions associated with the proposed redevelopment of the North Day Lot.਍ഀ North Day Lot is located along the south side of South Frontage Road, just east of the eastern਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle intersection within the Lionshead Village area in Vail, Colorado. The਍ഀ site currently consists of a parking lot with 105 spaces for Vail Resorts' employees.਍ഀ Redevelopment of this site is anticipated to include employee housing and skier pick-up and਍ഀ drop-off. The vicinity map illustrating the North Day Lot location is shown in Figure 1.਍ഀ The project is proposed to include employee housing units on the east side of the site. The west਍ഀ end of the site is anticipated to accommodate nine (9) parking spaces for skier pick-up/drop-off.਍ഀ The employee housing is anticipated to consist of a mixture of 2 bedroom, 3 bedroom, and 4਍ഀ bedroom dwelling units to accommodate up to 124 beds/ people.਍ഀ The purpose of this study is to identify project traffic generation characteristics, to identify਍ഀ potential project traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation਍ഀ measures required for identified impacts. Specifically, this traffic impact study has been਍ഀ prepared in accordance with CDOT requirements to include an evaluation of the existing traffic਍ഀ J਍ഀ conditions at the key intersections, as well as an evaluation of the short-term (2010) horizon.਍ഀ The intersection of South Frontage Road and eastern West Lionshead Circle intersection along਍ഀ with the proposed project access along West Lionshead Circle have been included for਍ഀ evaluation in this study.਍ഀ Regional access to the Lionshead area is provided by I-70. Primary access to the site is provided਍ഀ by the South Frontage Road. Direct access to the project site will continue to be from one access਍ഀ driveway along West Lionshead Circle. Access to the project site is currently provided from਍ഀ this full movement access driveway approximately 65 feet south of South Frontage Road along਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle. The current site plan illustrating the development and access is shown਍ഀ in Appendix A.਍ഀ Kindey-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 6਍ഀ 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS਍ഀ 3.1 Existing Roadway Network਍ഀ North Day Lot is located along the south side of South Frontage Road just east of the eastern਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle intersection. Primary access to the site will continue to be provided by਍ഀ South Frontage Road. In the site vicinity, South Frontage Road currently provides a single਍ഀ through lane in each direction with a 25 mile per hour posted speed limit. According to the਍ഀ State Highway Access Category Assignment Schedule, the segment of South Frontage Road਍ഀ adjacent to the site is categorized F-R. West Lionshead Circle also provides a single through਍ഀ lane in each direction in the site vicinity. The existing intersection of South Frontage Road with਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle (eastern intersection) operates with stop-control along the approach to਍ഀ South Frontage Road. Figure 2 illustrates the existing lane configuration and control at the key਍ഀ intersection of South Frontage Road with West Lionshead Circle.਍ഀ 3.2 Existing Study Area਍ഀ The existing site is comprised of a parking lot with 105 parking spaces for Vail Resorts'਍ഀ employees. There is a north-south pedestrian connection with an existing pedestrian bridge਍ഀ over Interstate 70 (I-70) between the North Day Lot development and areas north of I-70.਍ഀ Access to Vail Mountain is provided by a gondola located less than a quarter of a mile south of਍ഀ the project site. Hotel and condominium uses surround the site to the east, west, and south.਍ഀ 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes਍ഀ Existing peak hour turning movement counts were obtained at the existing key intersections of਍ഀ South Frontage Road with both West Lionshead Circle intersections and the Forest Road਍ഀ intersection as part of the Lionshead Village Transportation Plan Update prepared by Felsburg਍ഀ Holt & Ullevig (FHU) in November 2006. These counts were conducted during peak winter਍ഀ time periods. These turning movement counts are shown in Figure 3 with the text and figures਍ഀ referencing the counts from the FHU study provided in Appendix B.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 8਍ഀ i਍ഀ 3.4 Long Term Future Roadway Network਍ഀ According to the Lionshead Village Transportation Plan Update, South Frontage Road is਍ഀ recommended to be widened along project frontage to include one through lane in each਍ഀ direction with a continuous westbound left turn acceleration/ deceleration lane. In addition, a਍ഀ continuous eastbound right turn acceleration/ deceleration lane will be provided along the਍ഀ south side of South Frontage Road. Along the north side of South Frontage Road, a bike lane is਍ഀ planned.਍ഀ The proposed Ever Vail development is to be located along South Frontage Road west of the਍ഀ western intersection of West Lionshead Circle and South Frontage Road. With development of਍ഀ the Ever Vail project, the South Frontage Road will be realigned and improved adjacent to the਍ഀ project site. According to the Lionshead Village Transportation Plan Update, this realignment਍ഀ has been discussed as part of the Frontage Road planning with preliminary acceptance from਍ഀ CDOT. With realignment of South Frontage Road, a realignment of Forest Road is also਍ഀ proposed where Forest Road will.intersect South Frontage Road at the approximate current਍ഀ western intersection of West Lionshead Circle in a roundabout. Based on Town of Vail਍ഀ recommendations, this roundabout will provide a westbound bypass lane along South Frontage਍ഀ Road and a northbound to eastbound right turn bypass lane from Forest Road onto eastbound਍ഀ South Frontage Road. With this realignment, due to roadway geometrics, it is proposed that਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle intersect with Forest Road in a T-intersection approximately 200 feet਍ഀ south of the roundabout. The Frontage Road improvements, between Ever Vail and the Town਍ഀ of Vail Community Development building are anticipated to be constructed in one project,਍ഀ sometime after completion of the North Day Lot redevelopment. Figure 4 illustrates the਍ഀ anticipated future intersection lane configurations and control based upon the਍ഀ recommendations within the Lionshead Master Plan Study.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page II਍ഀ i਍ഀ 3.5 Future Traffic Volumes਍ഀ Future 2030 traffic volumes were obtained from the Town of Vail. These future long term traffic਍ഀ volume estimates were developed as part of a Frontage Road study being conducted by the਍ഀ traffic consultant for the Town of Vail, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) and include the possible਍ഀ future Simba Run & Interstate 70 (I-70) underpass. These future traffic volumes take into਍ഀ account development that is under construction, development that is already approved,਍ഀ development that was recently submitted to the Town for consideration, and potential਍ഀ development that might more efficiently utilize a given parcel of land. Specifically, these਍ഀ background traffic estimates include the redevelopment of the Lionshead Parking Structure and਍ഀ the Ever Vail redevelopment of the Holy Cross Maintenance site and realignment of South਍ഀ Frontage Road. Traffic volumes for the anticipated redevelopment of the Glen Lyon office਍ഀ building were also added to the background traffic projections. To determine traffic volumes਍ഀ along South Frontage Road for the 2010 short-term horizon, the existing 2006 traffic volumes਍ഀ were grown at an annual 2 percent growth rate. The 2010 short term traffic volume projections਍ഀ are shown in Figure 5. The 2030 long term traffic volume projections are shown in Figure 6.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 13਍ഀ j਍ഀ 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS਍ഀ 4.1 Trip Generation਍ഀ Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation.਍ഀ Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the਍ഀ development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates਍ഀ is the Trip Generation Report' published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). ITE਍ഀ has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses.਍ഀ Emp ee Housing਍ഀ The employee housing is anticipated to consist of a mixture of two (2), three (3), and four (4)਍ഀ bedroom dwelling units to accommodate up to 124 beds/people. It was assumed that on a਍ഀ typical day 80 percent of the residents (99 people) would be working and would therefore not਍ഀ generate vehicle trips during the morning and afternoon peak hours as it is expected that they਍ഀ will walk to work. Of the remaining 20 percent (25 people), the ITE Trip Generation Report਍ഀ average rate equations that apply to Apartment (220) were applied to determine the estimated਍ഀ trip generation for the remaining employees that were assumed to not work on a typical peak਍ഀ day at the resort and would therefore be available to make a vehicle trip during the morning਍ഀ and afternoon peak hours.਍ഀ Skier Pick-Llp and Drop-Ofi਍ഀ The site is anticipated to accommodate nine (9) parking spaces for skier pick-up/drop-off. It is਍ഀ anticipated that the nine (9) skier pick-up/drop-off spaces will have an average turnover rate of਍ഀ 10 minutes per space during the peak hour and will therefore generate 54 vehicles/108 trips਍ഀ during the morning and afternoon peak hours. It is understood that several spaces will have਍ഀ shorter and longer turnover rates, however when averaged over the nine (9) proposed spaces, a਍ഀ 10-minute interval is believed to be appropriate.਍ഀ 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Seventh Edition,਍ഀ Washington DC, 2003.਍ഀ Kimsey-Horn and Associates, Inc. V਍ഀ 0960940021 North Daly Lot Redevelopment Page 16਍ഀ Existing Employee Parking maces਍ഀ The existing parking lot provides parking spaces for 105 Vail Resorts' employees. Of these, 93਍ഀ of the employees arrive and depart during the two-hour morning and afternoon peak time਍ഀ periods. Based on information obtained from Vail Resorts Mountain Operations, it is assumed਍ഀ that 80 percent of these trips would actually occur during one common morning and afternoon਍ഀ peak hour. This results in 74 less arriving morning peak hour trips and 74 less departing਍ഀ afternoon peak hour trips due to the site redevelopment.਍ഀ Site specific traffic from the future North Day Lot (including the skier drop-off and pick-up, a਍ഀ public use relocated from Lionshead Place and replacing the illegal skier drop-off/pick-up that਍ഀ occurs on East Lionshead Circle) is expected to be approximately 115 trips during the morning਍ഀ peak hour and 118 trips during the afternoon peak hour. Accounting for the existing parking਍ഀ lot traffic generated today that will be relocated to another area of Town, the site, with the਍ഀ public skier drop-off/pick-up, is anticipated to add 41 trips during the morning peak hour and਍ഀ 44 trips during the afternoon peak hour. It is important to note that the majority of the skier਍ഀ pick-up and drop-off trips are existing relocated trips from other locations where it was਍ഀ previously occurring within the Town (Lionshead Place and East Lionshead Circle), and the਍ഀ remainder are new trips generated by convenience and enhancements provided at this new਍ഀ location. The employee housing unit trip generation is anticipated to be 7 AM and 10 PM peak਍ഀ hour trips, which represents the actual amount of new traffic generated by the housing project.਍ഀ Table 1 summarizes the estimated trip generation for the proposed redevelopment. The trip਍ഀ generation worksheets are included in Appendix C. These calculations illustrate the equations਍ഀ used, directional distribution of trips, and number of daily trips based on the published ITE਍ഀ rates.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 17਍ഀ I਍ഀ Table 1- North Dav Lot Development Trio Generation਍ഀ '਍ഀ Independent਍ഀ AM Peak Hour਍ഀ PM Peak Hour਍ഀ Parcel਍ഀ I਍ഀ TE Land਍ഀ Use Code਍ഀ Variable for਍ഀ Trip਍ഀ Generation਍ഀ Enter਍ഀ Exit਍ഀ Total਍ഀ Enter਍ഀ Exit਍ഀ Total਍ഀ Residential਍ഀ Employee Housing * 220਍ഀ 25 persons 1 6 7 7 3਍ഀ 10਍ഀ Sider Parking਍ഀ Skier Pick-up/Drop-off਍ഀ 9 spaces 54਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 108਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 108਍ഀ Subtotal 55਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 115਍ഀ =਍ഀ F57਍ഀ 118਍ഀ Existing Employee Parking Spaces਍ഀ Parking Space Removal 74 spaces਍ഀ -74਍ഀ ❑ -74 0 I਍ഀ L-7-4਍ഀ E:1਍ഀ Total਍ഀ -19਍ഀ 60 41 61਍ഀ -17਍ഀ 'Although there will be 124 beds, it is assumed that 20% of residents (25 people) will not be working and਍ഀ would be available to make a vehicle trip.਍ഀ "Assuming each parking space turns over every 10 minutes on average਍ഀ 'The current trips for the existing 93 parking spaces will no longer occur with this redevelopment. It is਍ഀ assumed that 80 percent of these trips occur during the AM (entering) and PM (exiting) peak hours.਍ഀ 4.2 Trip Distribution਍ഀ Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system਍ഀ characteristics, existing traffic patterns and volumes, and the proposed access system for the਍ഀ project. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site-਍ഀ generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site in the same਍ഀ direction. This distribution was developed in accordance with recommendations provided by਍ഀ the Town of Vail and takes into account the possible future Simba Run underpass of I-70 and਍ഀ realignment of Forest Road in conjunction with the Ever Vail redevelopment. Distributions਍ഀ were prepared separately for the employee housing and skier drop-off/pick-up. Figure 7਍ഀ illustrates the expected project distribution for the employee housing. Figure 8 illustrates the਍ഀ expected project distribution for the skier drop-off/pick-up portion of the site.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 18਍ഀ 4.3 Traffic Assignment and Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic਍ഀ Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the distributions to the estimated trip generation਍ഀ of the development shown in Table 1. Figure 9 illustrates the redevelopment traffic assignment਍ഀ for employee housing and skier drop-off/pick-up. These project traffic volumes were added to਍ഀ the background volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for the short term 2010 and਍ഀ long term 2030 horizons. Figures 10 and 11 illustrate the background plus project traffic਍ഀ volumes for the 2010 and 2030 horizon years, respectively.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/ North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 21਍ഀ 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS਍ഀ Kimley-Horns analysis of traffic operations in the site vicinity was conducted to determine਍ഀ potential capacity deficiencies in the 2012 and 2030 development horizon at the identified key਍ഀ intersections. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition਍ഀ of the Highway Capacity Man=12.਍ഀ 5.1 Analysis Methodology਍ഀ Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term਍ഀ describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or਍ഀ highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays਍ഀ and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, the Town of Vail਍ഀ recommends intersection LOS C as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations. Table 2਍ഀ shows the definition of level of service for unsignalized intersections.਍ഀ Table 2 - Level of Service Definitions਍ഀ Level of਍ഀ Service਍ഀ Unsignalized Intersection Average Total Delay਍ഀ sec/veh਍ഀ A਍ഀ <_10਍ഀ B਍ഀ >10and<_15਍ഀ C਍ഀ >15 and 25਍ഀ D਍ഀ >25 and 35਍ഀ E਍ഀ >35 and 50਍ഀ F਍ഀ >50਍ഀ Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000.਍ഀ 2 Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacihj Manual, Special Report 209, Washington DC, 2000.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 25਍ഀ Study area intersections were analyzed based on average total delay analysis for unsignalized਍ഀ intersections. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a two-way stop਍ഀ controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined਍ഀ for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is not਍ഀ defined for the intersection as a whole.਍ഀ 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis਍ഀ Calculations for the level of service at the key intersections identified for study are provided in਍ഀ Appendix D. Level of service for the two-way stop controlled intersections was calculated਍ഀ using Synchro analysis software with the LOS calculated using the Highway Capacity Manual਍ഀ (HCM) methodology.਍ഀ The critical gap and follow-up times were adjusted in the analysis for the northbound to਍ഀ westbound left turning vehicles at the intersection of the proposed full movement access਍ഀ driveway with South Frontage Road to account for the future left turn acceleration lane along਍ഀ South Frontage Road. These gap times were adjusted based on the procedure contained in the਍ഀ Highway Capacity Manual using equations 17-1 and 17-2 for two-stage gap acceptance. These਍ഀ calculations are included in Appendix E for reference.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 26਍ഀ South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle (East Intersection)਍ഀ For existing traffic, longer delays and Town of Vail determined unacceptable LOS D exist for਍ഀ the northbound to westbound left turning vehicles from West Lionshead Circle onto South਍ഀ Frontage Road during the PM peak hour. These delays are anticipated to increase through each਍ഀ year as traffic volumes increase along South Frontage Road. According to the Lionshead਍ഀ Village Transportation Plan Update, South Frontage Road is planned to be widened along਍ഀ project frontage to include one through lane in each direction with a continuous westbound left਍ഀ turn acceleration/ deceleration lane. In addition, a continuous eastbound right turn਍ഀ acceleration/ deceleration lane will be provided along the south side of the South Frontage਍ഀ Road. Along the north side of the realigned South Frontage Road, a bike lane is proposed. It is਍ഀ anticipated that these improvements will be constructed as one single project between Ever Vail਍ഀ and the Town of Vail Community Development. With these improvements, all movements at਍ഀ the intersection are anticipated to operate acceptably throughout the near term 2010 horizon.਍ഀ By 2030 with or without project traffic, all movements are anticipated to operate acceptably਍ഀ with the exception of the northbound left turn during the PM peak hour with the proposed਍ഀ Frontage Road improvements. The northbound left turn may operate with approximately 32਍ഀ seconds of delay per vehicle and LOS D with North Day Lot project traffic. Delays of this਍ഀ magnitude are reasonable and expected from minor street movements onto major streets during਍ഀ peak hours. If actual 2030 background traffic volumes projections are realized, the Town of Vail਍ഀ and/or CDOT may wish to consider restricting this intersection to three-quarter movements਍ഀ (northbound left restricted). Due to the street interconnectivity available to the Ever Vail਍ഀ roundabout proposed at Forest Road, it is believed that the northbound left turn movement਍ഀ could be allowed, with the option for traffic to reroute on the street network as necessary.਍ഀ Table 3 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 27਍ഀ Table 3 - SFR & West Lionshead Circle (East Intersection) LOS Results਍ഀ AM Pea਍ഀ k Hour਍ഀ PM Pea਍ഀ k Hour਍ഀ Delay਍ഀ Delay਍ഀ Scenario਍ഀ sec/veh਍ഀ LOS਍ഀ sec/veh਍ഀ LOS਍ഀ 2006 Existing਍ഀ Westbound Left਍ഀ 1.7਍ഀ A਍ഀ 2.4਍ഀ A਍ഀ Northbound Approach਍ഀ 14.1਍ഀ B਍ഀ 27.2਍ഀ D਍ഀ 2010 Background਍ഀ Westbound Left਍ഀ 1.6਍ഀ A਍ഀ 2.4਍ഀ A਍ഀ Northbound Approach਍ഀ 14.8਍ഀ B਍ഀ 31.5਍ഀ D਍ഀ 2010 Background Plus Project*਍ഀ Westbound Left਍ഀ 8.3਍ഀ A਍ഀ 9.0਍ഀ A਍ഀ Northbound Left਍ഀ 12.7਍ഀ B਍ഀ 16.2਍ഀ C਍ഀ Northbound Right਍ഀ 11.7਍ഀ B਍ഀ 12.8਍ഀ B਍ഀ 2030 Background*਍ഀ Westbound Left਍ഀ 9.5਍ഀ A਍ഀ 10.9਍ഀ B਍ഀ Northbound Left਍ഀ 16.9਍ഀ C਍ഀ 30.1਍ഀ D਍ഀ Northbound Right਍ഀ 15.4਍ഀ C਍ഀ 23.1਍ഀ C਍ഀ 2030 Background Plus Project਍ഀ Westbound Left਍ഀ 9.4਍ഀ A਍ഀ 11.4਍ഀ B਍ഀ Northbound Left਍ഀ 17.9਍ഀ C਍ഀ 32.1਍ഀ D਍ഀ Northbound Right਍ഀ 16.5਍ഀ C਍ഀ 22.4਍ഀ C਍ഀ * Includes improvements along South Frontage Road and separate northbound left and right turn lanes਍ഀ It is recommended that separate northbound left and right turn lanes be provided along the਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle approach to South Frontage Road. This will help facilitate northbound਍ഀ to westbound left and northbound to eastbound right turn movements onto South Frontage਍ഀ Road. Delay for the northbound right turning movement is anticipated to be better than਍ഀ reported since there will be little to no delay for these vehicles due to the construction of a free਍ഀ right turn acceleration lane along eastbound South Frontage Road adjacent to project frontage.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 28਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle & Access Driveway਍ഀ All movements at the full movement access driveway along West Lionshead Circle are਍ഀ anticipated to operate acceptably throughout the long term horizon with the addition of project਍ഀ traffic associated with this redevelopment. Table 4 provides the results of the level of service at਍ഀ this intersection.਍ഀ Table 4 - West Lionshead Circle & Project Access Driveway LOS Results਍ഀ AM Pea਍ഀ k Hour਍ഀ PM Pea਍ഀ k Hour਍ഀ Delay਍ഀ Delay਍ഀ Scenario਍ഀ sec/veh਍ഀ LOS਍ഀ sec/veh਍ഀ LOS਍ഀ 2010 Background Plus Project਍ഀ Westbound Approach਍ഀ 9.5਍ഀ A਍ഀ 9.7਍ഀ A਍ഀ Southbound Approach਍ഀ 4.9਍ഀ A਍ഀ 2.3਍ഀ A਍ഀ 2030 Background Plus Project਍ഀ Westbound Approach਍ഀ 9.7਍ഀ A਍ഀ 10.2਍ഀ B਍ഀ Southbound A oach਍ഀ 3.4਍ഀ A਍ഀ 1.9਍ഀ A਍ഀ It is recommended that the proposed access driveway approach to West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ operate with stop control. A "STOP" (R1-1) sign should be placed along this approach਍ഀ according to guidance provided in the MUTCD. Likewise, to avoid the potential of conflicts਍ഀ created by vehicles queuing exiting the site at the project driveway along West Lionshead਍ഀ Circle, it is recommended that a minimum throat depth of 50 feet be provided prior to the first਍ഀ skier drop-off/pick-up parking space. Due to the close proximity of the North Day Lot access਍ഀ driveway along West Lionshead Circle, northbound West Lionshead Circle is recommended to਍ഀ be posted with a R10-7 "DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION" sign prior to the site access.਍ഀ Kimsey-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Dad Lot Redevelopment Page 29਍ഀ 5.3 Auxiliary Turn Lane Recommendations਍ഀ The State Highway Access Category Assignment Schedule categorizes the segment of South਍ഀ Frontage Road adjacent to the site as F-R. In the site vicinity, South Frontage Road provides one਍ഀ lane of travel in each direction with a 25 mile per hour posted speed limit. As such, auxiliary਍ഀ turn lane requirements at the existing intersection of South Frontage Road with West Lionshead਍ഀ Circle are recommended based on requirements provided in the State Highway Access Code for਍ഀ category F-R roadways with a 25 mile per hour speed limit. According to the Access Code, a਍ഀ left turn deceleration lane plus taper with storage length is required for any access with a਍ഀ projected peak hour ingress volume greater than 25 vehicles per hour (vph). A right turn਍ഀ deceleration lane plus taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour ingress਍ഀ turning volume greater than 50 vph. Based on the 25 mile per hour posted speed limit,਍ഀ acceleration lanes would not be required. As such, auxiliary turn lane requirements are as਍ഀ follows:਍ഀ • According to the Access Code, an eastbound to southbound right turn deceleration lane is਍ഀ warranted based on existing traffic at the intersection of West Lionshead Circle with South਍ഀ Frontage Road. Per the Code, this lane should provide 110 feet of storage with a 7.5 to 1਍ഀ taper to accommodate future 2030 traffic volumes.਍ഀ • According to the Access Code, a westbound to southbound left turn deceleration lane is਍ഀ warranted based on existing traffic at the West Lionshead Circle & South Frontage Road਍ഀ intersection. According to the Code, this left turn deceleration lane is recommended to਍ഀ provide 200 feet of storage plus a 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ • A right turn acceleration lane along eastbound South Frontage Road is not warranted based਍ഀ upon the Access Code. However, based upon the Lionshead Master Plan recommendations,਍ഀ a right turn acceleration lane is recommended to be constructed for a length of 90 feet plus a਍ഀ 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 30਍ഀ • To allow for acceptable level of service for left turns onto South Frontage Road from West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle, a westbound left turn acceleration lane is recommended to be constructed.਍ഀ This left turn acceleration lane is recommended to be constructed for a length of 90 feet plus਍ഀ a 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 31਍ഀ 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS਍ഀ Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed North Day਍ഀ Lot redevelopment project will be successfully incorporated into the future roadway network.਍ഀ The proposed project development and expected traffic volumes resulted in the following਍ഀ recommendations:਍ഀ • According to the Lionshead Village Transportation Plan Update, South Frontage Road is਍ഀ anticipated to be widened along project frontage to include one through lane in each਍ഀ direction with continuous eastbound and westbound acceleration/ deceleration lanes.਍ഀ According to the Access Code, deceleration lanes are generally required. However,਍ഀ acceleration lanes are not warranted along South Frontage Road due to the existing 25 mile਍ഀ per hour posted speed limit. Based on recommendations included in the Lionshead Village਍ഀ Transportation Plan Update, acceleration lanes will be constructed to provide continuous਍ഀ acceleration/ deceleration lanes along South Frontage Road adjacent to project frontage. In਍ഀ addition, along the north side of South Frontage Road, a bike lane is proposed. It is਍ഀ anticipated that these Frontage Road improvements will be constructed by the Town in one਍ഀ project for the limits from Ever Vail to the Town of Vail Community Development,਍ഀ sometime after the North Day Lot redevelopment project is completed.਍ഀ • Through lane transitions for eastbound and westbound traffic around the proposed left turn਍ഀ lanes along the South Frontage Road are recommended to be constructed in accordance਍ഀ with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Since the speed limit of਍ഀ South Frontage Road is 25 miles per hour, the through lane transition lengths will follow the਍ഀ equation L=(W X S^2)/60, where L is the length of transition, W is the lateral offset, and S is਍ഀ the speed in miles per hour.਍ഀ • All improvements along South Frontage Road are recommended to be designed per the਍ഀ CDOT. State Highway Access Code for category F-R roadways with a 25 mile per hour਍ഀ speed limit.਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 32਍ഀ • The North Day Lot redevelopment project including the additional traffic generated from਍ഀ the skier drop-off/pick-up is not anticipated to increase traffic on the West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ leg at the South Frontage Road by more than 20 percent. Therefore, it is believed that a਍ഀ CDOT Access Permit will not be required for the project.਍ഀ • Auxiliary turn lane requirements for the West Lionshead Circle and South Frontage Road਍ഀ intersection have been identified. These turn lane improvements are warranted based on਍ഀ existing traffic conditions. It is recommended that when the Frontage Road improvements਍ഀ are constructed, the following turn lanes be included in the design:਍ഀ o According to the Access Code, an eastbound to southbound right turn਍ഀ deceleration lane is warranted based on existing traffic at the intersection of West਍ഀ Lionshead Circle with South Frontage Road. Per the Code, this lane should਍ഀ provide 110 feet of storage with a 7.5 to 1 taper to accommodate future 2030਍ഀ traffic volumes.਍ഀ o According to the Access Code, a westbound to southbound left turn deceleration਍ഀ lane is warranted based on existing traffic at the West Lionshead Circle & South਍ഀ Frontage Road intersection. According to the Code, this left turn deceleration਍ഀ lane is recommended to provide 200 feet of storage plus a 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ o A right turn acceleration lane along eastbound South Frontage Road is not਍ഀ warranted based upon the Access Code. However, based upon the Lionshead਍ഀ Master Plan recommendations, a right turn acceleration lane is recommended to਍ഀ be constructed for a length of 90 feet plus a 7.5 to 1 taper. This right turn਍ഀ acceleration lane will reduce the possible vehicle queue along the northbound਍ഀ West Lionshead Circle approach to the intersection.਍ഀ Kimsey-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021 North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 33਍ഀ o To allow for acceptable level of service for left turns onto South Frontage Road਍ഀ from West Lionshead Circle, a westbound left turn acceleration lane is਍ഀ recommended to be constructed. This left turn acceleration lane is recommended਍ഀ to be constructed for a length of 90 feet plus a 7.5 to 1 taper.਍ഀ • It is recommended that separate left turn and right turn lanes be provided along the਍ഀ northbound approach of West Lionshead Circle to South Frontage Road. This approach਍ഀ shall operate with stop-control and be posted with an R1-1 "STOP" sign.਍ഀ • To avoid the potential of conflicts created by vehicles queuing exiting the site at the project਍ഀ driveway along West Lionshead Circle, it is recommended that a minimum throat depth of਍ഀ 50 feet be provided prior to the first skier drop-off/pick-up parking space.਍ഀ • It is recommended that the proposed access driveway approach to West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ operate with stop control. A "STOP" (R1-1) sign should be placed along this approach਍ഀ according to guidance provided in the MUTCD.਍ഀ • Northbound West Lionshead Circle is recommended to be posted with a R10-7 "DO NOT਍ഀ BLOCK INTERSECTION" sign prior to the site access.਍ഀ • All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the਍ഀ Civil Drawings, and conform to Town of Vail and CDOT standards, as well as the Manual਍ഀ on Uniform Traffic Control Devices - 2003 Edition (MUTCD).਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/ North Day Lot Redevelopment Page 34਍ഀ APPENDICES਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096136000/North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ APPENDIX A਍ഀ Conceptual Site Plan਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Dcnj Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ c਍ഀ I £.F਍ഀ I ~਍ഀ ICI਍ഀ ~I਍ഀ ਍ഀ III ~਍ഀ y I਍ഀ 1਍ഀ I਍ഀ I'~ II਍ഀ I,1 ~1 I1਍ഀ 1 _ l਍ഀ 2਍ഀ A਍ഀ I ~਍ഀ i਍ഀ ~~pv਍ഀ S~਍ഀ a=਍ഀ 3਍ഀ A਍ഀ Al਍ഀ ਍ഀ .਍ഀ f਍ഀ >਍ഀ 1਍ഀ I `਍ഀ -i\ may- \਍ഀ \ ~ i਍ഀ I਍ഀ S਍ഀ it I I. \ V਍ഀ 3bYI~0V316NOf11L]M਍ഀ O਍ഀ APPENDIX B਍ഀ 2006 Existing Counts from FHU Study਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ Lionshead Village Transportation Plan Update਍ഀ II. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS਍ഀ As part of Frontage Road planning study, a series of intersection turning movement counts were਍ഀ collected throughout the Town during peak winter time periods. These included the key cross-਍ഀ street intersections within the Lionshead area, and the AM and PM peak hour turning਍ഀ movements representative of the 2006 timeframe are shown in Figure 1. The Frontage Road਍ഀ study focused on the PM peak hour time frame since the PM traffic flows were higher than the਍ഀ AM. However, one area of concern in the AM peak hour is the access intersection to the਍ഀ Lionshead Parking Structure. There is a relatively heavy inbound left turn that takes place਍ഀ during the AM peak hour, and this movement routinely creates queues along the Frontage਍ഀ Road. The creation of the queues is due to a combination of factors including:਍ഀ • The lack of a left turn lane which then causes some of the through traffic to be caught in਍ഀ the queue, and਍ഀ • The location of the parking entry booths offers limited stacking distance on-site, so਍ഀ excess queuing takes place along the Frontage Road਍ഀ As compared to the 1997 Presidents Day weekend PM peak hour traffic, the 2006 PM peak਍ഀ hour data are similar. Patterns for the Frontage Road and the cross-streets are also similar਍ഀ between the two time-frames. Magnitudes of the 2006 PM peak hour data are slightly higher਍ഀ than the raw 1997 data in some locations, but generally the two sets of traffic data are alike.਍ഀ Transit service is currently provided to the Lionshead area via several Town bus routes and the਍ഀ Eagle County regional service (ECO). Vail's In-town bus service terminates at Lionshead near਍ഀ the planned West Lionshead area. In-town bus stops are provided at several locations within਍ഀ Lionshead, but the busiest stop area is at the Lionshead Mall entrance located at the southwest਍ഀ corner of the Lionshead Parking Structure. This area is busiest primarily due to this location਍ഀ being closest to the Lionshead Gondola, but it also serves as the primary stop for the parking਍ഀ structure itself. Two West Vail bus routes both have scheduled stops at Lionshead Plaza਍ഀ located on the west side of the Lionshead Mall area. The ECO system also has programmed਍ഀ stop at Lionshead.਍ഀ One of Vail's two major parking structures also resides in Lionshead. Approximately 1200਍ഀ spaces are provided at the Lionshead parking structure. During winter season, this structure਍ഀ may fill between 30 and 40 times depending on season snow conditions. Typically, drivers are਍ഀ directed to this structure once the Village parking structure fills. When both structures fill, the਍ഀ Town parks excess vehicles along the Frontage Road. Peak days can see over 1,000 vehicles਍ഀ parked along the Frontage Road.਍ഀ N FELSBURG਍ഀ C4 1-I0LT &਍ഀ ULLEVIG਍ഀ Page 2਍ഀ w਍ഀ ਍ഀ Cf)i0~਍ഀ wx~਍ഀ Wo਍ഀ L਍ഀ ol~਍ഀ o~਍ഀ ~ a਍ഀ mss`਍ഀ d਍ഀ o` ~l 51251਍ഀ ~~s'਍ഀ i~rszsE~z਍ഀ 35(65) T਍ഀ X00(160\਍ഀ o਍ഀ N਍ഀ XII / I I਍ഀ I~ 55(100) i਍ഀ 65(95)਍ഀ I~ II਍ഀ ' J 30 165਍ഀ JJ J 50355; i਍ഀ mu਍ഀ J o J ~c`~ C,਍ഀ Lo C਍ഀ c਍ഀ 1' /J਍ഀ T co w਍ഀ w N O਍ഀ 0 ~ N਍ഀ O਍ഀ U w਍ഀ Cc$਍ഀ C', CIO਍ഀ I= ~c਍ഀ co਍ഀ 0 d਍ഀ 0਍ഀ cc਍ഀ N਍ഀ co਍ഀ c਍ഀ 0਍ഀ U-਍ഀ 0਍ഀ w਍ഀ U਍ഀ co਍ഀ O਍ഀ O਍ഀ Z਍ഀ D7਍ഀ 2਍ഀ ~17਍ഀ A਍ഀ IL਍ഀ 0਍ഀ a਍ഀ rn਍ഀ APPENDIX C਍ഀ Trip Generation Worksheets਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Dad Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ x਍ഀ X਍ഀ W਍ഀ co਍ഀ d~਍ഀ Lf)਍ഀ ^਍ഀ Lo਍ഀ n਍ഀ W਍ഀ x਍ഀ W਍ഀ H਍ഀ la,਍ഀ ~਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 20਍ഀ Gal਍ഀ ~਍ഀ 0 06਍ഀ h਍ഀ OL਍ഀ H਍ഀ y਍ഀ PL਍ഀ M਍ഀ N਍ഀ n਍ഀ 4਍ഀ fn਍ഀ y਍ഀ A਍ഀ 0਍ഀ ~਍ഀ MM਍ഀ G1਍ഀ ~਍ഀ o਍ഀ C਍ഀ t*t਍ഀ d਍ഀ ~b਍ഀ bt਍ഀ :3਍ഀ °਍ഀ 66਍ഀ cd਍ഀ o਍ഀ a਍ഀ d਍ഀ w਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Z਍ഀ w਍ഀ bO਍ഀ 2਍ഀ R+਍ഀ cn਍ഀ Q6਍ഀ :5਍ഀ ਍ഀ t਍ഀ n਍ഀ 5਍ഀ w਍ഀ q਍ഀ w਍ഀ '਍ഀ Cn਍ഀ ਍ഀ F਍ഀ ~ o਍ഀ c ~਍ഀ 01਍ഀ .A O਍ഀ M 00਍ഀ .a ~਍ഀ o ~਍ഀ ~ o਍ഀ Lf) o~਍ഀ o ~਍ഀ w਍ഀ N ~਍ഀ O਍ഀ 0p p਍ഀ Oyl p p਍ഀ Vol O oyi਍ഀ p ~ ;C਍ഀ m਍ഀ w਍ഀ tm obi਍ഀ .n o਍ഀ V v਍ഀ o ~ ~ o਍ഀ a਍ഀ CKimley-Hom਍ഀ and and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ Project _਍ഀ Subject਍ഀ Designed'-b)਍ഀ Checked by਍ഀ North਍ഀ November 11, 2008 Job No. 96094002਍ഀ Sheet No. 1 of 1਍ഀ TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES਍ഀ ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate਍ഀ Land Use Code - Apartment (220)਍ഀ Independant Variable - Persons (X)਍ഀ X = 25਍ഀ T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends਍ഀ Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (pane 316਍ഀ * Uses directional distribution from page 307਍ഀ Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 20% ent. 80% exit.਍ഀ T = 0.28 (X) T = 7 Average Vehicle Trip Ends਍ഀ T = 0.28 * 25.0 1 entering 6 exiting਍ഀ 1 + 6 = 7਍ഀ Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. (aaee 317਍ഀ * Uses directional distribution from page 308਍ഀ Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 65% ent. 35% exit.਍ഀ T = 0.40 (X) T = 10 Average Vehicle Trip Ends਍ഀ T = 0.40 * 25.0 7 entering 3 exiting਍ഀ 7 + 3 = 10਍ഀ Weekday (uaae 315)਍ഀ Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting਍ഀ T = 3.35 (X) T = 84 Average Vehicle Trip Ends਍ഀ T = 3.35 * 25.0 42 entering 42 exiting਍ഀ 42 + 42 = 84਍ഀ i਍ഀ APPENDIX D਍ഀ Synchro Intersection Analysis Worksheets਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 096094002/North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2006 AM Existing਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ I^਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ 1~਍ഀ 4਍ഀ Y਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 320਍ഀ 55਍ഀ 50਍ഀ 280਍ഀ 35਍ഀ 100਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 348਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 304਍ഀ 38਍ഀ 109਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 408਍ഀ 791਍ഀ 378਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 408਍ഀ 791਍ഀ 378਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 95਍ഀ 89਍ഀ 84਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 1151਍ഀ 344਍ഀ 673਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 408਍ഀ 359਍ഀ 147਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 38਍ഀ Volume Right;਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 109਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1151਍ഀ 540਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.24਍ഀ 0:05਍ഀ 0.27਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 4਍ഀ 27਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 00਍ഀ 1.7਍ഀ 14.1਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ B਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.7਍ഀ 14.1਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ Average Delay 2.9਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.8%0਍ഀ Analysis Period (min) 15਍ഀ ICU Level of Service B਍ഀ Baseline਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2006 PM Existing਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ ~ ~ ~ 4 1.1~਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ Fr਍ഀ Y਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 370਍ഀ 80਍ഀ 90਍ഀ 425਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 160਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 402਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 98਍ഀ 462਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 174਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 489਍ഀ 1103਍ഀ 446਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ uC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 489਍ഀ 1103਍ഀ 446਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 91਍ഀ 67਍ഀ 72਍ഀ cM`capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 1074਍ഀ 214਍ഀ 617਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 489਍ഀ 560਍ഀ 245਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 98਍ഀ 71਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 174਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1074਍ഀ 400਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.29਍ഀ 0.09਍ഀ 0.61਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 7਍ഀ 98਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.4਍ഀ 27.2਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ D਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.4਍ഀ 27.2਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ D਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Uti਍ഀ lization਍ഀ 75.1%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service D਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 AM Background਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ %W --10- "v 111r, 4% /01਍ഀ ...,r਍ഀ li਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ ਍ഀ 4਍ഀ 'Y'਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 345਍ഀ 55਍ഀ 50਍ഀ 305਍ഀ 35਍ഀ 100਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 375਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 332਍ഀ 38਍ഀ 109਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 435਍ഀ 845਍ഀ 405਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 435਍ഀ 845਍ഀ 405਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 41਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 95਍ഀ 88਍ഀ 83਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 1125਍ഀ 320਍ഀ 650਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 435਍ഀ 386਍ഀ 147਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 54਍ഀ 38਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 109਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1125਍ഀ 513਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.26਍ഀ 0.05਍ഀ 0.29਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 4਍ഀ 29਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.6਍ഀ 14.8਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ B਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.6਍ഀ 14.8਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ Infe S•- a Ak਍ഀ if w; d ilkcMft 4 'i'yb k,..਍ഀ ~w਍ഀ d.=. .°Ye. ..Iaw,k S.1+~ i਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 2.9਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Uti਍ഀ lization਍ഀ 58.4%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service B਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis਍ഀ 2010 PM Background਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ -r਍ഀ '1-*਍ഀ 411"਍ഀ ~਍ഀ 4\਍ഀ eh " "'':I.਍ഀ * 4P਍ഀ Me'਍ഀ hta਍ഀ ਍ഀ ~ .਍ഀ 1IVB਍ഀ 11N਍ഀ NaL਍ഀ N R ~਍ഀ `਍ഀ -਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ .਍ഀ 1~਍ഀ 4਍ഀ Y਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 400਍ഀ 80਍ഀ 90਍ഀ 460਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 160਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 435਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 98਍ഀ 500਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 174਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 522਍ഀ 1174਍ഀ 478਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 522਍ഀ 1174਍ഀ 478਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 91਍ഀ 64਍ഀ 71਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 1045਍ഀ 194਍ഀ 591਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 522਍ഀ 598਍ഀ 245਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 98਍ഀ 71਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 174਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1045਍ഀ 371਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.31਍ഀ 0.09਍ഀ 0.66਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 8਍ഀ 113਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.4਍ഀ 31.5਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ D਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.4਍ഀ 31.5਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ D਍ഀ Min Mthw*y 'T਍ഀ "I"਍ഀ nff਍ഀ I਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 6.7਍ഀ Intersection Capacity U਍ഀ tilization਍ഀ 78.5%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service਍ഀ D਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ I~਍ഀ C4਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 AM Total Improved਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ t਍ഀ r਍ഀ t਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 345਍ഀ 47਍ഀ 41਍ഀ 305਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 130਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 375਍ഀ 51਍ഀ 45਍ഀ 332਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 141਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ Raised਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 426਍ഀ 796਍ഀ 375਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ 375਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ 421਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 426਍ഀ 796਍ഀ 375਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ *5.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 96਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 79਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 1144਍ഀ 537਍ഀ 676਍ഀ t਍ഀ ,਍ഀ ,r 18਍ഀ !਍ഀ 1਍ഀ r tVB 2਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 375਍ഀ 51਍ഀ 45਍ഀ 332਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 141਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 45਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 51਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 141਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1144਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 537਍ഀ 676਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.22਍ഀ 0.03਍ഀ 0.04਍ഀ 0.20਍ഀ 0.13਍ഀ 0.21਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 3਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 11਍ഀ 20਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 8.3਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 12.7਍ഀ 11.7਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ B਍ഀ B਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.0਍ഀ 12.1਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 2.9਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 35.1%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ * User Entered Value਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 PM Total Improved਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ -10. -V f- 4\ to਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ t਍ഀ F I਍ഀ ♦਍ഀ I਍ഀ F਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 400਍ഀ 110 120਍ഀ 460਍ഀ 56਍ഀ 152਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 435਍ഀ 120 130਍ഀ 500਍ഀ 61਍ഀ 165਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ Raised਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 554਍ഀ 1196਍ഀ 435਍ഀ vC 1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ 435਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ 761਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 554਍ഀ 1196਍ഀ 435਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ *5.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 84਍ഀ 74਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 1026਍ഀ 381਍ഀ 626਍ഀ `N਍ഀ 1", =਍ഀ B਍ഀ v਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 435਍ഀ 120਍ഀ 130਍ഀ 500਍ഀ 61਍ഀ 165਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 130਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 61਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 120਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 165਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1026਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 381਍ഀ 626਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.26਍ഀ 0.07਍ഀ 0.13਍ഀ 0.29਍ഀ 0.16਍ഀ 0.26਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 11਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 14਍ഀ 26਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 9.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 16.2਍ഀ 12.8਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ C਍ഀ B਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.9਍ഀ 13.7਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 3.0਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 41.0%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ * User Entered Value਍ഀ ~wg਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ Ikw਍ഀ A਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Background Improved਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ ~ 410' 4\਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ +਍ഀ r਍ഀ Vi਍ഀ t਍ഀ Vi਍ഀ r਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 580਍ഀ 55਍ഀ 95਍ഀ 525਍ഀ 40਍ഀ 130਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 630਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 103਍ഀ 571਍ഀ 43਍ഀ 141਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ Raised਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 690਍ഀ 1408਍ഀ 630਍ഀ vC 1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ 630਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ 777਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 690਍ഀ 1408਍ഀ 630਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ '5.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 89਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 71਍ഀ cM capacity (vehlh)਍ഀ 904਍ഀ 347਍ഀ 485਍ഀ EB I਍ഀ a਍ഀ RNB 2਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 630਍ഀ 60਍ഀ ,਍ഀ 103਍ഀ 571਍ഀ 43਍ഀ 141਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 103਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 43਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 141਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 904਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 347਍ഀ 485਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.37਍ഀ 0.04਍ഀ 0.11਍ഀ 0.34਍ഀ 0.13਍ഀ 0.29਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 10਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 11਍ഀ 30਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 9.5਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 16.9਍ഀ 15.4਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ C਍ഀ C਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.5਍ഀ 15.8਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ C਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 2.5਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 49.1%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ " User Entered Value਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Background Improved਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ ਍ഀ ~਍ഀ 4਍ഀ M,orret਍ഀ 1NBt_਍ഀ WBT਍ഀ NBL਍ഀ NBR਍ഀ g`਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ I਍ഀ t਍ഀ r਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 685਍ഀ 80਍ഀ 175਍ഀ 740਍ഀ 75਍ഀ 205਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 745਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 190਍ഀ 804਍ഀ 82਍ഀ 223਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ Raised਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 832਍ഀ 1929਍ഀ 745਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 con) vol਍ഀ 745਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ 1185਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 832਍ഀ 1929਍ഀ 745਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ "5.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 76਍ഀ 64਍ഀ 47਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 801਍ഀ 223਍ഀ 418਍ഀ f਍ഀ 2਍ഀ WB 1਍ഀ X`਍ഀ :.t਍ഀ 4__਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 745਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 190਍ഀ 804਍ഀ 82਍ഀ 223਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 190਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 82਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 87਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 223਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 801਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 223਍ഀ 418਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.44਍ഀ 0.05਍ഀ 0.24਍ഀ 0.47਍ഀ 0.36਍ഀ 0.53਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 23਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 40਍ഀ 76਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 10.9਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 30.1਍ഀ 23.1਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ D਍ഀ C਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.1਍ഀ 24.9਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ C਍ഀ .਍ഀ ਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 4.5਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Uti਍ഀ lization਍ഀ 59.9%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service਍ഀ B਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ * User Entered Value਍ഀ J਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report 1j਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 AM Total Improved਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ .o.਍ഀ w.,..a਍ഀ ,,R਍ഀ . WL., 1/1/13.T਍ഀ NBL਍ഀ NCR a.਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ t਍ഀ r਍ഀ t਍ഀ Vi਍ഀ r਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 580਍ഀ 47਍ഀ 86਍ഀ 525਍ഀ 70਍ഀ 160਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 630਍ഀ 51਍ഀ 93਍ഀ 571਍ഀ 76਍ഀ 174਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ Raised਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 682਍ഀ 1388਍ഀ 630਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ 630਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ 758਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 682਍ഀ 1388਍ഀ 630਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ *5.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 90਍ഀ 79਍ഀ 64਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 921਍ഀ 355਍ഀ 485਍ഀ Dire >t ifce # EB'1਍ഀ yEB-਍ഀ it1 B਍ഀ V"y0 2 ft1~' 1਍ഀ B-,਍ഀ IFA਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 630਍ഀ 51਍ഀ 93਍ഀ 571਍ഀ 76਍ഀ 174਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 93਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 76਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 51਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 174਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 921਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 355਍ഀ 485਍ഀ Volume-to-Capacity---਍ഀ ----0737--਍ഀ -0.03-਍ഀ - 0.1-0 - -਍ഀ -0.34਍ഀ ---021-਍ഀ 0.36਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 8਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 20਍ഀ 40਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 9.4਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 17.9਍ഀ 16.5਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ -਍ഀ A਍ഀ C਍ഀ C਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.3਍ഀ 16.9਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ C਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 3.2਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 49.2%਍ഀ I਍ഀ CU Level of Service A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ * User Entered Value਍ഀ c Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total Improved਍ഀ 1: South Frontage Road & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ =RT FRR WRI WRT NRI NRR '3F਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ f਍ഀ r਍ഀ +਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 685਍ഀ 110਍ഀ 205਍ഀ 740਍ഀ 66਍ഀ 197਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 745਍ഀ 120਍ഀ 223਍ഀ 804਍ഀ 72਍ഀ 214਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ Raised਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 864਍ഀ 1995਍ഀ 745਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ 745਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ 1250਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 864਍ഀ 1995਍ഀ 745਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ "5.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 72਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 49਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 787਍ഀ 203਍ഀ 418਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 745਍ഀ 120਍ഀ 223਍ഀ 804਍ഀ 72਍ഀ 214਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 223਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 72਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 120਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 214਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 787਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 203਍ഀ 418਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.44਍ഀ 0.07਍ഀ 0.28਍ഀ 0.47਍ഀ 0.35਍ഀ 0.51਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 29਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 37਍ഀ 71਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 11.4਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 32.1਍ഀ 22.4਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ D਍ഀ C਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.5਍ഀ 24.8਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ C਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 4.4਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 61.1%਍ഀ ICU Level਍ഀ of Service B਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ * User Entered Value਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2010 AM Total Improved਍ഀ 4: West Lionshead Circle & kcce,-5 North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ f ~ fi l਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ Y਍ഀ 1਍ഀ a'਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 135਍ഀ 5 55਍ഀ 33਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 147਍ഀ 5 60਍ഀ 36਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 305਍ഀ 149਍ഀ 152਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 confvol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 305਍ഀ 149਍ഀ 152਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 99਍ഀ 93਍ഀ 96਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 663਍ഀ 902਍ഀ 1441਍ഀ v਍ഀ tts.L 1਍ഀ .਍ഀ ਍ഀ ac ~਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 152਍ഀ 96਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 60਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 878਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1441਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.08਍ഀ 0.09਍ഀ 0.04਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 7਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 3਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 9.5਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 4.9਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ A਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 9.5਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 4.9਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 3.6਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Uti਍ഀ lization਍ഀ 26.2%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 2਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersectio Capacity Analysis਍ഀ 4: West Lionshead Circle & ~ceess਍ഀ 2010 PM Total Improved਍ഀ North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ 'r 4-- t਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ Y਍ഀ 1~਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 57਍ഀ 151਍ഀ 5 61਍ഀ 169਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 62਍ഀ 164਍ഀ 5 66਍ഀ 184਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 483਍ഀ 167਍ഀ 170਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 483਍ഀ 167਍ഀ 170਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 99਍ഀ 93਍ഀ 95਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 521਍ഀ 883਍ഀ 1420਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 67਍ഀ 170਍ഀ 250਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 66਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 62਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 836਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1420਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.08਍ഀ 0.10਍ഀ 0.05਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 7਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 4਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 9.7਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.3਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ A਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 9.7਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 2.3਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ ਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 2.5਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 34.3%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 2਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis਍ഀ 2030 AM Total Improved਍ഀ 4: Access & West Lionshead Circle਍ഀ North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ r਍ഀ t਍ഀ ਍ഀ 1਍ഀ . ,਍ഀ W.R,਍ഀ _ ,z NBT਍ഀ NOR, :SaL਍ഀ $BT਍ഀ F~_... 5 tL . Mt਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ ਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 60਍ഀ 170਍ഀ 5 55਍ഀ 78਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 185਍ഀ 5 60਍ഀ 85਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 392਍ഀ 188਍ഀ 190਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 392਍ഀ 188਍ഀ 190਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 99਍ഀ 92਍ഀ 96਍ഀ ~s cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 590਍ഀ 860਍ഀ 1396਍ഀ # MW਍ഀ MW਍ഀ 1਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 71਍ഀ 190਍ഀ 145਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 60਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 65਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 830਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1396਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.09਍ഀ 0.11਍ഀ 0.04਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 7਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 3਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 9.7਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 3.4਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ A਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 9.7਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 3.4਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ A਍ഀ ktike~ .g਍ഀ .gin,਍ഀ 4਍ഀ Average Delay਍ഀ 2.9਍ഀ Intersection Capacity Utilization਍ഀ 30.4%਍ഀ ICU Level of Service਍ഀ A਍ഀ Analysis Period (min)਍ഀ 15਍ഀ it Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 2਍ഀ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030 PM Total Improved਍ഀ 4: Access & West Lionshead Circle North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ f- 4- t 1਍ഀ Lane Configurations਍ഀ Y਍ഀ T਍ഀ Sign Control਍ഀ Stop਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Free਍ഀ Grade਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ 0%਍ഀ Volume (veh/h)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 57਍ഀ 206਍ഀ 5 61਍ഀ 254਍ഀ Peak Hour Factor਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ 0.92 0.92਍ഀ 0.92਍ഀ Hourly flow rate (vph)਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 62਍ഀ 224਍ഀ 5 66਍ഀ 276਍ഀ Pedestrians਍ഀ Lane Width (ft)਍ഀ Walking Speed (ft/s)਍ഀ Percent Blockage਍ഀ Right turn flare (veh)਍ഀ Median type਍ഀ None਍ഀ Median storage veh)਍ഀ Upstream signal (ft)਍ഀ pX, platoon unblocked਍ഀ vC, conflicting volume਍ഀ 635਍ഀ 227਍ഀ 229਍ഀ vC1, stage 1 conf vol਍ഀ vC2, stage 2 conf vol਍ഀ vCu, unblocked vol਍ഀ 635਍ഀ 227਍ഀ 229਍ഀ tC, single (s)਍ഀ 6.4਍ഀ 6.2਍ഀ 4.1਍ഀ tC, 2 stage (s)਍ഀ tF (s)਍ഀ 3.5਍ഀ 3.3਍ഀ 2.2਍ഀ p0 queue free %਍ഀ 99਍ഀ 92਍ഀ 95਍ഀ cM capacity (veh/h)਍ഀ 424਍ഀ 818਍ഀ 1351਍ഀ wit਍ഀ _ 1਍ഀ , >਍ഀ ~iw max:਍ഀ Volume Total਍ഀ 67਍ഀ 229਍ഀ 342਍ഀ Volume Left਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 66਍ഀ Volume Right਍ഀ 62਍ഀ 5਍ഀ 0਍ഀ cSH਍ഀ 761਍ഀ 1700਍ഀ 1351਍ഀ Volume to Capacity਍ഀ 0.09਍ഀ 0.13਍ഀ 0.05਍ഀ Queue Length 95th (ft)਍ഀ 7਍ഀ 0਍ഀ 4਍ഀ Control Delay (s)਍ഀ 10.2਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.9਍ഀ Lane LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ A਍ഀ Approach Delay (s)਍ഀ 10.2਍ഀ 0.0਍ഀ 1.9਍ഀ Approach LOS਍ഀ B਍ഀ Baseline Synchro 6 Report਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 2਍ഀ APPENDIX E਍ഀ Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculations਍ഀ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.਍ഀ 0960940021North Day Lot Redevelopment਍ഀ 0਍ഀ Critical Gap Calculation਍ഀ Equation 17-1 (Highway Capacity Manual, 2000)਍ഀ k. = t4baw + tGxvPHv + tc,GG - kT - t3,LT਍ഀ • t,x = critical gap for movement x (s)਍ഀ • t4bw, = base critical gap from Exhibit 17-5 (s)਍ഀ • t,,Hv = adjustment factor for heavy vehicles (1.0 for two-lane major streets and 2.0 for਍ഀ four-lane major streets) (s)਍ഀ • PHv = proportion of heavy vehicles for minor movement਍ഀ • t4GG = adjustment factor for grade (0.1 for movements 9 and 12 and 0.2 for movements 7,਍ഀ 8, 10, and 11) (s)਍ഀ • G = percent grade divided by 100਍ഀ • tc T = adjustment factor for each part of a two-stage gap acceptance process (1.0 for first or਍ഀ second stage; 0.0 if only one stage) (s)਍ഀ • t3,LT = adjustment factor for intersection geometry (0.7 for minor-street left-turn਍ഀ movement at three-leg intersection; 0.0 otherwise) (s)਍ഀ • South Frontage Road is the major street and is a two-lane road਍ഀ • Critical movement is a left turn from minor to a two-lane major street - northbound left਍ഀ will only cross one lane of opposing traffic਍ഀ • The percent heavy vehicles on the minor street W L is 2 percent਍ഀ • Movement 7 is the critical movement਍ഀ • The critical movement occurs on a flat portion of South Frontage Road (0% grade)਍ഀ • The critical movement is in the first or second stage in the two-stage gap acceptance਍ഀ process਍ഀ • The critical movement is a minor-street left-turn movement at a three-leg intersection਍ഀ Resultant Equation:਍ഀ t,=7.1+(1.0)(0.02)+(0.2)(0/100)-1.0-0.7=5.42਍ഀ E਍ഀ Follow-Up Time Calculation਍ഀ Equation 17-2 (Highway Capacity Manual, 2000)਍ഀ tf x - k base + tf,HVPHV਍ഀ • tfx = follow-up time for minor movement x (s)਍ഀ • tfbase = base follow-up time from Exhibit 17-5 (s)਍ഀ • tf Hv = adjustment factor for heavy vehicles (0.9 for two-lane major streets and 1.0 for four-਍ഀ lane major streets) (s)਍ഀ • PHv = proportion of heavy vehicles for minor movement਍ഀ • South Frontage Road is the major street and is a two-lane road਍ഀ • Critical movement is a left turn from minor to a two-lane major street - northbound left਍ഀ will only cross one lane of opposing traffic਍ഀ • The percent heavy vehicles on the minor street pt is 2 percent਍ഀ Resultant Equation:਍ഀ Tfx=3.5+0.9(0.02)=3.5਍ഀ •਍ഀ 0਍ഀ