Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdvisory CommitteeJuly 17 Advisory Committee Site Plan Options Cost Estimates Preliminary Engineering Chamonix Site Master Plan Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda July 17, 2008 Meeting start time: 11:00 am (Lunch provided) Presentation of Sustainable Design Concepts (15 min.) Modular Construction (15 min.) III. Discussion on Target Market and Housing Gap (25 min.) IV. Presentation and Review of Site Plan Options: (1 hr.) a. Project Goals and Design Parameters b. Final site plan options c. Preliminary grading and engineering plans d. Three-dimensional modeling e. Preliminary cost estimates V. Formation of Final Recommendation (45 min.) VI. Adjournment (2:00 p.m.) ,. .,. West Vail Site Planning Concepts Narrative K .,~• The development of site planning concepts for the Chamonix site is premised on the stated goals and objectives of the Vail Community. A variety of opportunities and constraints that result from the physical characteristics of the site have been identified by the design team, and these parameters inform the planning process as well. The charge to "optimize the site" requires that a spectrum of planning concepts be explored and evaluated by all stakeholders. In the end, the best plan will be the one that balances the concepts of density, neighborhood impact, traffic & parking, aesthetics, sustainability and value. A menu of site planning concepts has been created for consideration by the community. These ideas are illustrated in three diagrams identified as Option 1 -Neighborhood Cluster, Option 2 - Street/Alley.c~ Caption 3- Villa~~/1~Teighborlibod Custer. Additional information about the proposed site plan diagrams follows: f .~ ~~ ~ f . Option, t;•~1,eaghborhood Cluster • ~stimafed ~0 Residential Units • Unit Mix: 4 -1 bedroom 768 SF/unit 8 - 2 bedroom flat 1,292 SF/unit 16 - 2 bedroom loft 1,333 SF/unit ~ 14 - 3 bedroom 1,460 SF/unit 8 - 3 bedroom duplex 1,632 SF/unit • Project Site Density: 14 dulacre • Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 39,073 sf (16%) • Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 64,546 sf (26%) • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 103,619 sf (42%) • Buildings are organized in neighborhood clusters for the lowest density units. • Open space/view corridors separate the clusters. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights are generally 3-stories and do not exceed 4-stories. • A combined 3-story fire station & dormitory plan of approximately 20,000 SF is illustrated. The parcel can accommodate a future ambulance services facility of 6,000 SF. ~m~~~ ~, Option 2- Street ley • Estimated 8 esidential Units ~ L20 - 2 bedroom flat 1,292 SF/unit 16 - 2 bedroom loft 1,333 SF/unit 8 - 3 bedroom 1,460 SF/unit LZ 14 - 3 bedroom duplex 1,632 SF/unit • Project Site Density: 16 du/acre • Unit Mix: 0 -1 bedroom 768 SF/unit ~~~ ~~ V ry Q W ~ ~ X J 2 ~ a a '' m J ~ O > vUi .~ O O O O O ~ N O O O O N S O O O O O b Ol O O O S O m O O O O O 0 0 O O N O O O m O N O 0 0 n O O n O O~ of t0 0 0 0 0 0 1~ b N N '~ N O O N Of 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O m O V ill 'I ry h O N N O 01 N v1 N n N N M a q S m O O O M m O T 0 0 0 v~ n .r O n O n N n fl1 T O O O b n m O ry N M O Y~ N m lD N m Of ~ V IO m 10 R N b n ill O) N m ~ ~ of C O~ O O ri ~ ul N O ~ .-i ~ n n ~ O O h W V N N ~ ei Oi O O CO N n N N N N N V O ~ n .y 10 VI H N O V1 n m 1 N T N N N N N N N N N O n H V erl ~ N N H n M~ N N N N N OQ N N ~ N N N ~ VII H N N N PI N N 3 C O O 000$$0 uf~N 0 0 0 o m m o 000 o 0 0 0 0 0000 000 n.y ~ ono m u~ e o 0 0 o n u ' m v Sn °o on l°vnmmm ~~,o„ o rv N O N o vi o of .i ~oaui .+n b m ~o N ~ oo a+ ~ a ~n N n .~ N b m m O l0 n Yf Ol N m ~ ~ wi N n O O VI N Oi r O N N .-i Oi N O W N NN a N b O NNN M ilml O~ ~n11 T n Q O M N~ N N n V I T~ N N N N T C O N • N N N .~i NN N N N ~,j N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 ~ O O O O O m 0 0 O O O O O N O m N m D O O O n H IO O n 0 b V O O O O n m N y O O1 0 0 •+ OI 0 0 0 0 0 e~i M Ul O a O O O N O m O O N O G O N DO O R Y1 N 1~ Y1 O M O OI N N~ l0 N m Ol m~ Yl N rv Y1 of p ^ N O I~ O n n nl M T O O O IO W ` • M O M O m lD O Yl b n Ol W -i i ~ O W i n ~ N ` N M OI C ' .-i ~ n• n O O V n h O b b N N O N ~ O O m V . N O O ~ Vbf m N N N m O ~ m m ~~ 1 m h N N N N N O N N N O ~ n m N ~ m N N N N O N N~ N N N Y1 N N N ~ N~ N 3 u c 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N . 0 0 O o0 0 O O O O m 0 O O O n Ioonomu~~oaoooo nio a 000000 0 m S ro oo °o N m vO1i m m No o N ° ~ovN~nvio vi o a.~ '~b '~mm<u'Nrv a m N onon nm m o en m O O O ~n Io r .n m m N Io m td N ~ O O W Of n H V~ lO V VNINN M vml O .Wi N T n N W K I M~ N N ~NVf NN ~ n NN Obi C O .6 NN ~..i N N N .~i W CO N N NN Ci N N O O O O O O O N~ N O O O O O N O O O O O O 10 m O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O N O O O m O O O O n N ~D O n 0 Of Y1 b O O O O O n m N ' '~ C O Oi O O T C O O O O ~ 0 OI O O O Yf n H O m 0 0 O AI O O O O ~ O N V ~ O •t N N N O N N O n~ m t0 ~ m Of ~ O VI N uN 1 q m O n O n N n ~ T T 0 0 0 t0 n m 1 N N O ~ M O < n ~ O m O VI h N b m V h b r ~ W N m Oi h ~ sT ~ ~D ~ ~'1 Oi rv O 00 m 1D C V ~ ~ 1 e~~ N m e T m n~ n N 10 vt H N N N O ti O O m N N N N N VMf N N N ~ n N V C N iN/I O N N IR VIN N N ..j N N N b N N N N OI N N N N N N N N 3 m 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ID W O 0 0 O O O O O O N O O O O 0 0 0 N l0 O I~ O 01 N IG O O O O O 1~ 10 O O W O O O T M O OI O O O C < 0 0 O m 0 0 'I N O M CI at IO m t0 N 00 Ol ~ R N N H N M V O I~ O n N n ~'1 T O O Q r YI N N b O N m O N n N b m ~O O Y1 ~O n VI O1 ro Oi r O N b N~ Oi O O m m O m N Vf m m n~ nN N N N N VI O T N . T ~ T m V V O ~ T N O m m~ N d' N N N N V N N n NN N N C O NN ~„~ N N ~ N N N H N N 6 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y1 ~ N O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 m 0 0 0 0 O m O O O 0 0 O O O O O m O 0 0 n ~D O n 0 N Y1 m V 0 0 0 n b N '~ O O Ci N H N 0 0 0 0 O O O~ n H $ O O O O 0 0 C ~ O a h ei n O N O~ N m t0 N Op ^~ V N N ai N N q rl T o nm O r O~ N n M t o ~ ~ : ' goo ~o i o Nbrom ne in a+ m N 1° ^l " ° ~c ~ ' o o v a uI . N N ti V1 V1 m n b N .-i l0 ill N Q r ~ ~ a y~ N~ ~ H ' v o~ N h ~ M N N N M O T N N e i N a N N N N y m N n N N N N N N ~ l N N N N N N N N N 3 a z° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi n n 00 0000 b.. eo o$ 0 0 0 0 o m N m o a o n e on o b a o 0 o nIO ~ m a 0 of o o ai 0 0 o ° ° o ri ai c~ .+ rv `l n m ni °o mn°o °n rvnm°mm o o ~ a . v im e vm em~Ninen. m O M 0 0 n ~ Y1 N N O N R~ V1 ~ N ~-i M O O W N N N M Q {~/ Y N N m N O~ N M N N ~ N a 'a" ~ m N N N N N N N n C O ~y N N rv~ N N N N N N 7 C `d ... Q d Y o 3 ~ vA d oL 2 q ~ r ae m Z ~' c'n ~ _ Q 4 >> -i ` ~ ~' ., ~ ~ m d ~ ~' c p = ~ V ~ ~ i+ m 3 V N C Y~ Y~ ~ m H N c ~ Z O q d O O c 0 v c N ~ O N c« « 'i Y N W 'O' V c ~ ,~ .O ~ q G U 0 0 ° rn o ~ y o n W u c» u o E c ~ c ~ o f o ` ~ ` ~ ° 0 O = o O ;. c c me QyN2'L'c o' o Z N o ,~. ~ ° 0 2 ~ nEv Ti n~v « n mkt vsi >~ ~ m~ o d 3 ~ m u °a ` w ~ y o Y ~ d Z - SO U ~ Z °~ ° 0 c ~_ ° cu= ~ c z mm'q' t- o ,i ~ 2 ~ y mu a ^ ' :. ~ c f ~ u a a u ° Z' o u ` Z ` c Y u . " 'c c .°-° ?« '° c eL 'a a ~ z o p a «~ .m A ` d d . _< . V U o_ o_ O m Q V z O w ~ Y E W C C W C N J C J J W H Q m N Q m i M m 0~ O~~~ E V V N d d d ~' d~ m d~ LL ~ V C J VI ~ C W W q r O ~ y VI N A ~ N 'O d 9 V1 N M A Z C d C LL iif f- N- F- b f 9 "'~ A f ' ~ ~ w w H H I n F O in ii O~ LL O~ i~ H O v~ g ~ f VAIL, CHAMONIX ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 1-ALLEY & STREET 15-Jul-08 DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 REMOVE ASPHALT 33717 SF $1.00 $33,717.00 REMOVE CURB 506 LF $12.00 $6,072.00 REMOVE LIGHT POLES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 REMOVE TREES 20 EA $175.00 $3,500.00 REMOVE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 EARTHWORK 18735 CY $20.00 $374,700.00 CUT 1S9U8 CY CIII ~A~7 ('V ASPHALT 2305 TON $65.00 $149,825.00 CURB AND GUTTER 2960 LF $35.00 $103,600.00 8" PVC (SAN.) 1092 LF $42.00 $45,864.00 SAN. MH 12 EA $5,000.00 $60,000.00 SAN. SVC. 25 EA $300.00 $7,500.00 CONNECT TO EX SANITARY 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8" PVC (WAT.) 1417 LF $35.00 $49,595.00 WATER SVC. 25 EA $650.00 $16,250.00 FH ASSEMBLY 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 FITTINGS 19 EA $500.00 $9,500.00 GATE VALVES 6 EA $1,200.00 $7,200.00 CONNECT TO EX WATER 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 RETAINING WALL 140 CY $600.00 $84,000.00 TOPSOIL STRIP 2911 CY $8.00 $23,288.00 TOPSOIL REPLACE 1265 CY $8.00 $10,120.00 TOTAL: $1,075,731.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $161,359.65 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%): $75,301.17 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL: $1,312,391.82 SUSTAINAB)LITY ALTERNATE DETENTION POND 3 EA $20,000.00 $60,000.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 EA $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL: $111,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $16,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%) $7,770.00 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE: $1,447,811.82 ASSUMPTIONS: 1. NO BASE COURSE UNDER PAVEMENT 2.7" ASPHALT THICKNESS 3. WEIGHT OF ASPHALT TO BE 110 LB/SY/IN 4. 65' ON EACH WATER AND SANITARY SERVICE 5. ASSUME 1' THICK RETAINING WALLS AND 1' BELOW GRADE 6. PRICE OF DETENTION POND INCLUDES GRADING 7. PRICE OF OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES STRUCTURE AND AN ASSUMED LENGTH OF 100' OF 36" CMP CULVERT 8. 6" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL 9. 10%COMPACTION FACTOR FOR FILL VAIL, CHAMONIX CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 1-ALLEY & STREET 15-J u I-08 Description SF $/SF Total OPTION A Stick Built Construction 71,904 285 $20,492,640.00 Fire Staion Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option ATotal $24,632,640.00 OPTION B Stick Built Construction 71,904 285 $20,492,640.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option B Total $26,067,840.00 OPTION C Modular Construction 71,904 205 $14,740,320.00 Fire Station Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 0 tion C Total $18,880,320.00 OPTION D Modular Construction 71,904 205 $14,740,320.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option D Total $20,315,520.00 Assumptions: Residential Square Footage: 71,904 Cost per SF (Stick Built): $285.00 Cost per SF (Modular): $205.00 Fire Station Square Footage: 2-Stories: 15,000 3rd Story: 5,200 Cost per SF (Firestation): $276.00 Fire Station Option 1 includes 2 stories. Fire Station Option 2 includes 2 stories plus a 3rd story dormitory. VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 1-ALLEY & STREET 15-J u I-08 Description QTY. Unit Material ($) Inst. ($) Total PEDESTRIAN Concrete Sidewalk-4" thick, 4' wide 15911 S.F. 7.4 11 $292,755.59 Flagstone - v3/4", gravel base, sand bedding 2512 S. F. 13.1 9.4 $56,513.03 Concrete Paver - 4"x8"x2 1/4" 0 S.F. 8.6 4.8 $0.00 Stairs - cast in place, 5 riser 0 EA. 223 505 $0.00 Pedestrian Subtotal $349,268.62 RETAINING WALLS Dry Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 0 L.F. 199 87.5 $0.00 Mortar Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 680 L.F. 199 77 $187,680.00 Retaining Walls Subtotal $187,680.00 FENCING Vinyl Covered Chain Link-4' 286 L.F. 4.87 1.65 $1,864.72 Fencing Subtotal $1,864.72 SITE LIGHTING double arm, 20' industrial 3 EA. 1425 1050 $7,425.00 Eurotique, Dark-Skies, 14', aluminum pole 10 EA. 2720 1000 $37,200.00 Lighting Subtotal $44,625.00 TRAFFIC CONTROLS Concrete Bollards 0 EA. 750 90 $0.00 High-Intensity Traffic Signage 6 EA. 55 13.65 $411.90 Traffic Control Subtotal $411.90 SITE FURNISHINGS Benches - 8', steel frame, fir seat 7 EA. 530 87.5 $4,322.50 Trash Receptacle - 30 gal. 7 EA. 300 15 $2,205.00 Site Furnishing Subtotal $6,527.50 IRRIGATION Pop Up Spray - 18' Square 20136 S.F. 0.16 0.47 $12,685.68 Irrigation Subtotal $12,685.68 TREES AND SHRUBS Aspen (Populus tremuloides) 2" 60 EA. 269 $16,140.00 Gamble Oak (Quercus gambelii) #5 0 EA. 49 $0.00 Dogwood (Swida sericea) 3-4' 27 EA. 59 $1,593.00 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus)#5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Wood' s Rose (Rosa woodsii) #5 50 EA. 39.99 $1,999.50 Chokecherry (Padus virginiana) 2" 0 EA. 299 $0.00 Mountain Maple (Ater glabrum) 6-8' 10 EA. 199 $1,990.00 Narrowleaf Cottonwood (Populus angusttifolia) 2" 14 EA. 249 $3,486.00 Alder (Alnus incana) #15, 4' 10 EA. 119.99 $1,199.90 Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) #5 0 EA. 34.99 $0.00 Summit Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 1/2" 0 EA. 374 $0.00 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) 6' 18 EA. 299 $5,382.00 Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) 5' 0 EA. 219 $0.00 Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) #5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Juniper (Sabina monosperma) 5' 0 EA. 249 $0.00 Trees and Shrub Subtotal $31,790.40 Page 1 GROUND COVER Turf (bluegrass) 20136 S. F. 0.45 $9,061.02 Aspen Grass Seed Mix 15 lbs. 8 $120.00 Xeric Grass Seed Mix 0 lbs. 12 $0.00 Ground Cover Subtotal $9,181.02 FORBS Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) 4" std. 100 EA. 5.75 $575.00 Golden Aster (Heterotheca villosa) #1 100 EA. 6.75 $675.00 Lupine (Lupinus argenteus) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 3.85 $385.00 Goldenrod (Solidago app.)10 cu. in. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Firercracker Penstemon (Penstemon eatonii) 10 cu. In. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 HERBACEOUS Colorado Columbine (Aquilegia caerulea) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana ssp. ovalis) 2.5" 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 White Geranium (Geranium richardsontii) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 4.85 $485.00 Showy Daisy (Erigeron speciosus) 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Forbs & Herbaceous Subtotal $3,545.00 Tree Pits 6-7' Evergreen, 4'x1-3/4', 18 EA. 91.5 113 $3,681.00 7-9' Deciduous, 2-1/2'x1-1/2' 171 EA. 36.5 64.5 $17,271.00 Tree Pit Subtotal $20,952.00 TOTAL: $668,531.83 CONTINGENCY (15%): $100,279.77 TOTAL: $768,811.61 Page 2 s ac f °o ~ c N o m O = u ~? F Z O aL H ~ xg ~~ Q N >~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 ° N O O b ~ ~ O~° O°~ Y°i M O I~ u°f N O O N m ' o °e o N ._ a _ coi$°n ryo~. X00 ° ~ of c rv ui ~ .n .n u'~i o :° °o° °o° ° ~°n °n 'way $ m n ~ .+ .i ~ n m .n H a F'o r°v$ vi .~+ a r~Dn e e v vi ni~oi ernine o v`"imNmm.°+'~m e ao ~ .+ N .V ni v°1i .. H N h .n H N 3 v c 0 O ~ v+ N h N N 'i N °OO°o~ °o °on m m °o °o o~' NOO ~°o°o °m u°+`~ o n°.°n°o ow .°+ o °m°$'°"n°a °u n moo no 00n non o vii ~ m~'.°. 1°`"Qa u O N m N O v+ N N .`. a m '^ m N N. s~ v. .n .n .n v+ a e O. O O ~n N H a e °o°o°o°o°o °o n~~ 'ai oo ry~u .n rN $nv+ ~dc~ce ~i °o°o o°o °.°. co oco °o °o ~n .. ~eNm m °o ^i oo mo uie m m moan°o m i°n m o n~°n .°n°oo '^ n we 00 ~°'~0 o u~i m r'Vi mn m w tie n mN.m. omeM w r u e N N. v+v+ H~ o.+ v~ N N N n.. H ~ NN .n .nw .n N a 3 V O O °o°o °o°OO °on~'.°i o aiooNO O 1~ S O O ~ ~ ~ ~ w°o o W O u1 < W M mgio°o °m ~°n~ o nu°+ b N n N O vii N 1+1 H n ~ N o ~-I N N C. U C O p N u i O b N HN Vf N r ~ H y~ °i vl N ~n of N N N b 0 0 0 0 0 0 1~ M N $m °On ~ o.u'-i~ rwi n e o m vi n O O O° O° c c c o o°° °o e~.°r N~ .+ ~ n O c °o °v m O c °o 1° O a 0° m O n u°f v°f 0 0 N a~n .mir ui oiNw erv °' mm nm `"°m °o n~ a v`Vi ~~ H" rv a v n 3 m 0 O ~ N N N ~ ~ m o O °o°o°oo°o °on"'.°r °on°fYrv.°io ~°o n v'o ~ o ui ~ .n v~'iHNin .n .n °o °o°o °o°n ~ .ai "'' o H 'a H .n °o °o °o io°o °m `V o m °OO O.~'+ enn~n o n rv mna.°n rwi~ H~ ~ Nm ~~NH NON m uwni w w r°n •- a c N 3 Q O °o°o°o°o°o °onm ooi oo rvN Mari o °o n ~n ~n o io n .n .n .°~`. o.i0i un.n N N °o °o °o °o °o .°. °°o c o o~o'~ °o ~o n h ~a N °o °o oo °o ~.°i m N N °o c m N m°o ~°o °o °m v°im o nv°i rvN~ 'a n'" n mna ~ ~+ m rv ~~N~N vs ~n~~.n H m N ~^ °m p p ° 0 0 0 1~ m O O O ~ O b O N v°f ~ O 1p ° Y°t wN a vi 'iN Vmi e a o O °ni°n N O1 .°. o~°nn w.n .nN`~ wa Muni `~ us .n °w °o o .°. N ' ~ n ~u ov+ ~°nN V"i~v`"ihhh .n N ~ e a °v 3 ~ ~a da z z O O ~~ N ~ L = ~, V j `o q ~`, o m w e O - ` u a » u w u ra o2'l o 2~ Y 2 a c'€ ~? ~ `o € c o p - o c ' te a '°" m e u - ° a u O O H N ~ Y zNn~3`.E, ~ c ! ~ w ._ L " =°Y"~ " ~ Yii ~° o ~ 0 9 °o ~ « 6 `o y ~ ~ 9 Y 0 02 ` _ w C 3 ~ ~ N 9 O z.^_ mu ~ `vm rc!c!aa~ ° ~ uc g_ 6 0 3 o c u cw -- c a c c2_ c y _c " y .- A ~ ~ G 7 Q ° o ~ m= o Z' « ° u o o G `0 2'« ° c _ . a r c _ «~ ~ c u q a ~ 'oa "$« c °~ ~ 9 p i °u cW E 01 0 2 w ~ 'v«-i w _ C~ w N W =~ S e • p o - N ~Om Om m O ~ C v °y O ~~ m y q C ~.~ a i u Z a C u in H '- H l7 LL f c 3 a F ~ z , , ~°- ' ' 2~ y °uo~.,- ~« o~- 0 O~ii F e O~ii g 3 ~ ° VAIL, CHAMONIX ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 2 -VILLAGE & NEIGHBORHOOD 15-Jul-08 nFCrel~rlnnl nrv_ UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 REMOVE ASPHALT 33717 SF $1.00 $33,717.00 REMOVE CURB 506 LF $12.00 $6,072.00 REMOVE LIGHT POLES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 REMOVE TREES 20 EA $175.00 $3,500.00 REMOVE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 EARTHWORK 22526 CY $20.00 $450,520.00 I CUT 19952 CY FIII 7574 CY ASPHALT 2201 TON $65.00 $143,065.00 CURB AND GUTTER 2688 LF $35.00 $94,080.00 8" PVC (SAN.) 1134 LF $42.00 $47,628.00 SAN. MH 10 EA $5,000.00 $50,000.00 SAN. SVC. 20 EA $300.00 $6,000.00 CONNECT TO EX SANITARY 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8" PVC (WAT.) 1169 LF $35.00 $40,915.00 WATER SVC. 20 EA $650.00 $13,000.00 FH ASSEMBLY 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000.00 FITTINGS 15 EA $500.00 $7,500.00 GATE VALVES 3 EA $1,200.00 $3,600.00 CONNECT TO EX WATER 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 RETAINING WALL 91 CY $600.00 $54,600.00 TOPSOIISTRIP 2911 CY $8.00 $23,288.00 TOPSOIL REPLACE 1265 CY $8.00 $10,120.00 TOTAL: $1,080,105.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $162,015.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%): $75,607.35 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL: $1,317,728.10 DETENTION POND 3 EA $20,000.00 560,000.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 EA $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL: $111,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $16,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%) $7,770.00 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE: $1,453,148.10 ASSUMPTIONS: 1. NO BASE COURSE UNDER PAVEMENT 2.7"ASPHALT THICKNESS 3. WEIGHT OF ASPHALT TO BE 110 LB/SY/IN 4. 65' ON EACH WATER AND SANITARY SERVICE 5. ASSUME 1' THICK RETAINING WALLS AND 1' BELOW GRADE 6. PRICE OF DETENTION POND INCLUDES GRADING 7. PRICE OF OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES STRUCTURE AND AN ASSUMED LENGTH OF 100' OF 36" CMP CULVERT 8.6" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL 9. 10% COMPACTION FACTOR FOR FILL VAIL, CHAMONIX COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 2 -VILLAGE & NEIGHBORHOOD 15-J u I-08 Description SF $/SF Total OPTION A Stick Built Construction 90,665 320 $29,012,800.00 Fire Staion Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option ATotal $33,152,800.00 OPTION B Stick Built Construction 90,665 320 $29,012,800.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option B Total $34,588,000.00 OPTION C Modular Construction 90,665 240.29 $21,785,892.85 Fire Station Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option CTotal $25,925,892.85 OPTION D Modular Construction 90,665 240.29 $21,785,892.85 fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option D Total $27,361,092.85 Assumptions: Residential Square footage: Cost per SF (Stick Built): Cost per SF (Modular): Fire Station Square Footage: 2-Stories: 3rd Story: Cost per SF (Firestation): Fire Station Option 1 includes 2 stories. Fire Station Option 2 includes 2 stories plug 90,665 $320.00 $240.29 15,000 5,200 $276.00 a 3rd story dormitory. VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 2 -VILLAGE & NEIGHBORHOOD 15-Jul-08 Description QTY. Unit Material ($) Inst. ($) Total PEDESTRIAN Concrete Sidewalk-4" thick, 4' wide 12762 S.F. 7.4 11 $234,822.09 Flagstone - v3/4", gravel base, sand bedding 2512 S. F. 13.1 9.4 $56,513.03 Concrete Paver - 4"x8"x2 1/4" 15921 S. F. 8.6 4.8 $213,347.83 Stairs - cast in place, 5 riser 0 EA. 223 505 $0.00 Pedestrian Subtotal $504,682.95 RETAINING WALLS Dry Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 0 L.F. 199 87.5 $0.00 Mortar Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 751 L.F. 199 77 $207,276.00 Retaining Walls Subtotal $207,276.00 FENCING Vinyl Covered Chain Link- 4' 197 L.F. 4.87 1.65 $1,284.64 Fencing Subtotal $1,284.64 SITE LIGHTING double arm, 20' industrial 3 EA. 1425 1050 $7,425.00 Eurotique, Dark-Skies, 14', aluminum pole 10 EA. 2720 1000 $37,200.00 Lighting Subtotal $44,625.00 TRAFFIC CONTROLS Concrete Bollards 2 EA. 750 90 $1,680.00 High-Intensity TrafficSignage 6 EA. 55 13.65 $411.90 Traffic Control Subtotal $2,091.9.0 SITE FURNISHINGS Benches - 8', steel frame, fir seat 7 EA. 530 87.5 $4,322.50 Trash Receptacle - 30 gal. 7 EA. 300 15 $2,205.00 Site Furnishing Subtotal $6,527.50 IRRIGATION Pop Up Spray - 18' Square 20564 S.F. 0.16 0.47 $12,955.32 Irrigation Subtotal $12,955.32 TREES AND SHRUBS Aspen (Populus tremuloides) 2" 0 EA. 269 $0.00 Gamble Oak (Quercus gambelii) #5 30 EA. 49 $1,470.00 Dogwood (Swida sericea) 3-4' 0 EA. 59 $0.00 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus)#5 25 EA. 37.99 $949.75 Wood' s Rose (Rosa woodsii) #5 0 EA. 39.99 $0.00 Chokecherry (Padus virginiana) 2" 20 EA. 299 $5,980.00 Mountain Maple (Ater glabrum) 6-8' 15 EA. 199 $2,985.00 Narrowleaf Cottonwood (Populus angusttifolia) 2" 11 EA. 249 $2,739.00 Alder (Alnus incana) #15, 4' 18 EA. 119.99 $2,159.82 Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) #5 0 EA. 34.99 $0.00 Summit Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 21/2" 15 EA. 374 $5,610.00 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) 6' 0 EA. 299 $0.00 Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) 5' 26 EA. 219 $5,694.00 Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) #5 50 EA. 37.99 $1,899.50 Juniper (Sabina monosperma) 5' 15 EA. 249 $3,735.00 Trees and Shrub Subtotal $33,222.07 Page 1 GROUND COVER Turf (bluegrass) 20564 S.F. 0.45 $9,253.76 Aspen Grass Seed Mix 0 lbs. 8 $0.00 Xeric Grass Seed Mix 10 lbs. 12 $120.00 Ground Cover Subtotal $9,373.76 FORBS Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) 4" std. 100 EA. 5.75 $575.00 Golden Aster (Heterotheca villosa) #1 0 EA. 6.75 $0.00 Lupine (Lupinus argenteus) 10 cu. in. 50 EA. 3.85 $192.50 Goldenrod (Solidago app.)10 cu. in. 0 EA. 2.85 $0.00 Firercracker Penstemon (Penstemon eatonii) 10 cu. In. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 $0.00 HERBACEOUS $0.00 Colorado Columbine (Aquilegia caerulea) 10 cu. in. 0 EA. 2.85 $0.00 Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana ssp. ovalis) 2.5" 0 EA. 2.85 $0.00 White Geranium (Geranium richardsontii)10 cu. in. 0 EA. 4.85 $0.00 Showy Daisy (Erigeron speciosus) 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Forbs & Herbaceous Subtotal $1,337.50 Tree Pits 6-7' Evergreen, 4'x1-3/4', 91 EA. 91.5 113 $18,609.50 7-9' Deciduous, 2-1/2'x1-1/2' 134 EA. 36.5 64.5 $13,534.00 Tree Pit Subtotal $32,143.50 TOTAL: $855,520.13 CONTINGENCY (15%): $128,328.02 TOTAL: $983,848.15 Page 2 f ~~ ~~+ ~ O o~ ~ m x = t~ z o z Q ^+ u f 4 ~ _ , J N N ° °°°og°o°am n ° n oo °o °o $°o a oo ~ °o a °m `" n°o .°n °^' ~~~ °:~ _ n $~NOOm~~4 m ..o umi e ooo ~~ m ~ o °rv , g ^m~°e N e e in nNnNn ae n m NN N1 e m v°i TRH V'^i vrviN m NN hm N ~ m o NU +N D NNN N NOi y ~D N N 3 O C O O N O o O o° °° 0 o°°o °o°vm ' ooo~c N~cm °on v°im.~m.~°o umi uie N.+n NN u~i o .~i of n N N N 0 °o °° °o° o 0 oc °o rv°a o~ vio u~i .y a o vni N .+ 0° A W N o o .~ rv °o .c °m, mn °o ino m n rvNnv~.. ~~a'uio ~°o n.°nno ~°c °: ~NVrvi a m~r\'rv Nrv m~ rvq N NNNNN hN N N n m °m ui °OO°o°o °a m(: ~~ °°$ n °°o °° ~ °o is "b m° ~°nmmn °o ~°n °° vim u 'a auw G n O a°0 0 m~ O N 00000 n n 0 0 ~ °og °° 'iN V mvdnc ° one ~oeNn $' a0 m O b u ~ C ~ ~ m~ W Yi O N .-i ri NN iNif O~ N 0 O P ~ N H .~Di N m NN H N ~ Q .-i µ ~ V N M~ ~Nn V ~ W N NNN N N N N N N N 3 u c 0 O N N N v O O °o°° °o°°° °°°a mn 0ai ~ o w °o~ °m o m~$ umi Nm mvi en NNNU'"io~vnim N N cg .°+ N~ °° n e N n °°~o°o °m, i°n tO `V °o v°i°o vi n ~ m .i ~v nio$nNrio .. e N~ n e °m nom' ~'N r00io N NNN NN N N ° N ~ ° °o °o g S °o °a m n ° °o °o °o °o °o O C o °° G O $ ° e °o °m .°n m m n °o v°+ °° n N O ~ I~ C N Oi ° N ~ N '~ O n Y°f Omi ~ M .Ni O N ^ O O O 0 0 0 1p F O~ d O N ~$ n N O ~ p i N V N i m rv . < O OP ~c .+ .c Nin m mnrvn n Nm .-iri N N N M N N ~a.i .min N N T N ~ m M N N O~ N an.Nn up°. ac n N N N N N N N N 3 m C O O N N N m o O O O O O O O R M 1~ °on°m.°i min vu'iN u1°u+N `° N N N O O O °°°N m .°+"' rv H~ N O ~ m of N O b 0 O°f V°i ~ M I~ O v°I N N e.m-~ri in 'iNam°rvnNnv N.°nNNNNN N mn NN N S ° ~" = °o °o°OO ° °o o °a m n °m o~in t0 m gm °O °o °o°a N °00 °o n "'n m ° ° O O °o °° ° ° °°, a rni °°~°o° m n°o .°n a~ v°i m v~ n ~°e °1.meNV`~i m m nrv°n na° _ m ~ uidNq^ NN v"'io.~'+ N o a . ~.. N N e ° ° ° H c m~HN ti" mN nn NN NNN N H 3 a c 0 O N N ° 0 0 0 0° ~o°~ oci:uem o° c o o N O b O T ^'m m °n ~°N°a mN Cnl Q O 6 O N m VI O N N N N N O H N N N N O O F D m N ry n N N N N N N N n m o e u a 3 ~a ~ n N z O zmN ` L ~ ' ~ = O m u N `~' a N ~ W 3 .. ° c '~ ~ ° z ° « z" u j u .m ~ 'n ° q . m V to O ~ m a u '~' o vv«u° v " ~ O q~" Z c v ~~N o a ° o .. ~ o N ~« ~~ aEe ° u m a -' = ~~m ~ °u u - ° r u a a m c c a u o C F N c c 'c z °0aou 6? L l ¢ '" = L`o n L~° o_ O c n p - c° E o ~,Z ° ~ ~ ~ v° Cam, E Y' 2 ~.°~ ` _ p c 3 " .„ `^ °~ ~ c- z!? $' ~ g ~ mum~ W= y o t o Y ~ - a - mW ~ ' m~ ~ a e u a c c_ c « ~Y G ~O O Q= o mZ'~ - ~ m.° o N z'o o u co x m 0 o O a Q« ~ z m im m ~ ie@ c u c_- N N '~ v n and oa sa .. u~ ti O v W W o m Z ~~ A E cu, 7 w c .. W 00 a H a h ~ ~^ Om = y v Om Nm ~ ~ 09 o ~ „v O~ w m v ,. ~' N o iz uviH ~ ~Ht7 u°1-c 3 n c ~ a ~ ` .. z F ~ Y Ou O m- O~- o O y u a O f u H 9 ~= F VAIL, CHAMONIX COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 3 -NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER 15-Jul-08 DES[RIPTION OTY_ UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 REMOVE ASPHALT 33717 SF $1.00 $33,717.00 REMOVE CURB 506 LF $12.00 $6,072.00 REMOVE LIGHT POLES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 REMOVE TREES 20 EA $175.00 $3,500.00 REMOVE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 EARTHWORK 17449 CY $20.00 $348,980.00 I CUT 12184 CY Gu i S~FS C'Y ASPHALT 1749 TON $65.00 $113,685.00 CURB AND GUTTER 2412 SF $35.00 $84,420.00 SIDEWALK 8168 SF $12.00 $98,016.00 8" PVC (SAN.) 1154 LF $42.00 $48,468.00 SAN. MH 11 EA $5,000.00 $55,000.00 SAN. SVC. 22 EA $300.00 $6,600.00 CONNECT TO EX SANITARY 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8" PVC (WAT.) 1258 LF $35.00 $44,030.00 WATER SVC. 22 EA $650.00 $14,300.00 FH ASSEMBLY 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 FITTINGS 22 CY $500.00 $11,000.00 GATE VALVES 7 EA $1,200.00 $8,400.00 CONNECT TO EX WATER 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 RETAINING WALL 28.8 CY $600.00 $17,280.00 TOPSOIL STRIP 2911 CY $8.00 $23,288.00 TOPSOIL REPLACE 1265 CY $8.00 $10,120.00 TOTAL: $1,014,376.00 CONTINGENCY: $152,156.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES: $71,006.32 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL: $1,237,538.72 SUSTAINABILITY ALTERNATE DETENTION POND 3 EA $20,000.00 $60,000.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 EA $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL: $111,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $16,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%) $7,770.00 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE: $1,372,958.72 ASSUMPTIONS: 1. NO BASE COURSE UNDER PAVEMENT 2. 7" ASPHALT THICKNESS 3. WEIGHT OF ASPHALT TO BE 110 LB/SY/IN 4. 65' ON EACH WATER AND SANITARY SERVICE 5. ASSUME 1' THICK RETAINING WALLS AND 1' BELOW GRADE 6. PRICE OF DETENTION POND INCLUDES GRADING 7. PRICE OF OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES STRUCTURE AND AN ASSUMED LENGTH OF 100' OF 36" CMP CULVERT 8. 6" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL 9. 10%COMPACTION FACTOR FOR FILL VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 3 -NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER 15-J u I-08 Description SF $/SF Total OPTION A Stick Built Construction 85,440 285 $24,350,400.00 Fire Staion Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option A Total $28,490,400.00 OPTION B Stick Built Construction 85,440 285 $24,350,400.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 0 tion B Total $29,925,600.00 OPTION C Modular Construction 85,440 205 $17,515,200.00 Fire Station Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option C Total $21,655,200.00 OPTION D Modular Construction 85,440 205 $17,515,200.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option D Total $23,090,400.00 Assumptions: Residential Square Footage: Cost per SF (Stick Built): Cost per SF (Modular): Fire Station Square Footage: 2-Stories: 3rd Story: Cost per SF (Firestation): Fire Station Option 1 includes 2 stories. Fire Station Option 2 includes 2 stories ~ 85,440 $285.00 $ 205.00 15,000 5,200 $276.00 plus a 3rd story dormitory. VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 3 -NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER 15-J u I-08 Description QTY. Unit Material ($) Inst. ($) Total PEDESTRIAN Concrete Sidewalk-4" thick, 4' wide 8452 S. F. 7.4 11 $155,515.70 Flagstone - v3/4", gravel base, sand bedding 16850 S. F. 13.1 9.4 $379,126.58 Concrete Paver-4"x8"x21/4" 0 S. F. 8.6 4.8 $0.00 Stairs - cast in place, 5 riser 0 EA. 223 505 $0.00 Pedestrian Subtotal $534,642.27 RETAINING WALLS Dry Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 0 L.F. 199 87.5 $0.00 Mortar Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 642 L.F. 199 77 $177,192.00 Retaining Walls Subtotal $177,192.00 FENCING Vinyl Covered Chain Link-4' 343 L.F. 4.87 1.65 $2,237.66 Fencing Subtotal $2,237.66 SITE LIGHTING double arm, 20' industrial 3 EA. 1425 1050 $7,425.00 Eurotique, Dark-Skies, 14', aluminum pole 10 EA. 2720 1000 $37,200.00 Lighting Subtotal $44,625.00 TRAFFIC CONTROLS Concrete Bollards 0 EA. 750 90 $0.00 High-Intensity Traffic Signage 6 EA. 55 13.65 $411.90 Traffic Control Subtotal $411.90 SITE FURNISHINGS Benches - 8', steel frame, fir seat 7 EA. 530 87.5 $4,322.50 Trash Receptacle - 30 gal. 7 EA. 300 15 $2,205.00 Site Furnishing Subtotal $6,527.50 IRRIGATION Pop Up Spray- 18' Square 34722 S. F. 0.16 0.47 $21,874.86 Irrigation Subtotal $21,874.86 TREES AND SHRUBS Aspen (Populus tremuloides) 2" 62 EA. 269 $16,678.00 Gamble Oak (Quercus gambelii) #5 0 EA. 49 $0.00 Dogwood (Swida sericea) 3-4' 0 EA. 59 $0.00 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus)#5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Wood' s Rose (Rosa woodsii) #5 50 EA. 39.99 $1,999.50 Chokecherry (Padus virginiana) 2" 0 EA. 299 $0.00 Mountain Maple (Acer glabrum) 6-8' 9 EA. 199 $1,791.00 Narrowleaf Cottonwood (Populus angusttifolia) 2" 14 EA. 249 $3,486.00 Alder (Alnus incana) #15, 4' 18 EA. 119.99 $2,159.82 Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) #5 0 EA. 34.99 $0.00 Summit Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 1/2" 0 EA. 374 $0.00 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) 6' 21 EA. 299 $6,279.00 Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) 5' 0 EA. 219 $0.00 Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) #5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Juniper (Sabina monosperma) 5' 0 EA. 249 $0.00 Trees and Shrub Subtotal $32,393.32 Pa e 1 GROUND COVER Turf (bluegrass) 34722 S. F. 0.45 $15,624.72 Aspen Grass Seed Mix 10 lbs. 8 $80.00 Xeric Grass Seed Mix 0 lbs. 12 $0.00 Ground Cover Subtotal $15,704.72 FORBS Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) 4" std. 100 EA. 5.75 $575.00 Golden Aster (Heterotheca villosa) #1 100 EA. 6.75 $675.00 Lupine (Lupinus argenteus) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 3.85 $385.00 Goldenrod (Solidago app.) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Firercracker Penstemon (Penstemon eatonii) 10 cu. In. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 HERBACEOUS Colorado Columbine (Aquilegia caerulea) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana ssp. ovalis) 2.5" 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 White Geranium (Geranium richardsontii) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 4.85 $485.00 Showy Daisy (Erigeron speciosus) 100 EA. $0.00 Forbs & Herbaceous Subtotal $3,260.00 Tree Pits 6-7' Evergreen, 4'x1-3/4', 21 EA. 91.5 113 $4,294.50 7-9' Deciduous, 2-1/2'x1-1/2' 153 EA. 36.5 64.5 $15,453.00 Tree Pit Subtotal $19,747.50 TOTAL: $858,616.74 CONTINGENCY (15%): $128,792.51 TOTAL: $987,409.25 Page 2 __~ _~_.~ 0 N i f'_n~(~ ~u ul ~ Imo' t---~~ Q f O w O ~ F ~ x W O Q Q "~ V W o O O O O O N N 000000 .,~ O O O N' oooaSm p0 O 008. N N W O O O n N ~S S~, loo NO OOOnm N N S~SSrvm°'o~ Soo°~~ SSR NS$m~~~~~a~~~~ i M ,n mery oro ooolcn m oo NUS ~1o o~Nry ENO S°~ p v1 o a~~ N N I~ 1~0 N eNi N N ~~!1 .~i N V a~ ^ ti p N a0 VI N N V1 ~ N 1~1 ip N M O .~ N N N O N N H N ~ N ~ N N 0 p~ 1 N °o o a 10 ~ eNq o °o °o °o o °o g " o °m, ~ 10 °a, 0 0 0 °o, n e o °o, ` p a , , ° o ° o O O O N m p opp o ~0 00 ~D N N W 001 YO O N N N N ~ v1 a+ 00 0 ~ N n n rv n m m m e o n 00 ~ N 04 °1 o v~ , ~ . 1n m ~ ~ 1 us ti vi m D i~ in m v i o .~ . 9 ~ ti ~ ~ v N o N N N 0 O 00 0 0 O ~N O 0 0 0 0 1D m O O O O N. O O O O a W 8.. 0 0 ~p p n O N i0l1 ~ V 0 0 0 0 hb N '- O m O N O 0 0 0 N I N 0 0 0 N pp O N O .y n v1 O N N n H rv~~ N N~ n~~ ~ Ifl y ._ C W O N M m O O 1~ m M; O M N O 10 n '1 ~ l , O O O t0 h H H~ ~ n n N M O M Oa ~ ~ 10 00 10 ~~ ti~ N m N O~ m ~ ~ ~~~ N~ N ma M 4 ~ N to VT N A N N N N K N M N ti~ m N N N v i N H 3 u C O i N ° ° ° ° ° rv ° oo ~ oo°o °o nm nomv°i~°a ~v °a a .. e q o o o o, o, s . o 'oio0 ~ a m a^ N M ° 00 oN m o m a , , ~~~.n ..n owNNU.nti ~ r .. m i s ~ u o N m N M N h O rv N 0 w ^ .ai ~ N p o m W N O ~~+1 N ~m/1 N O vl t/i Vl n tD. N O h N ~ ~ i . ~ VI ~ ~ N y y j N N ~ O erv+ ~ °o °o °o °o °o °a °o °o °o °o °o m °o °a °o $ ~c °o ~' °o, °m, v°i ~ °v, o °o °o °o ~ m r , , , , cmo ~ .. °+~+N N , o000 .~i o co ° roo is o.~viNOai .#. ^' ° ° ~ ° `~ ~ ~ a i "1 om S°,.°$°r° °0°o °o 1cn~ ~ o°N ~ v N1c v i 1o n. ~ i m 1 -+-+~ ~ : o 'g' 10 ..+ o ° i °4 c N a ni o m N '^ 1o n ti :n in .~i~ ti .n o ~nrg .i N N N ,-i ~ ~ n v'^i ~ ~ ~ N ri .o°. ~ a v v ., N ~ N `8 a ~ $ n . a °n 00 "' .°n v~ ~n ~. ° n .n vim. v. .n. m ~n ~ N N 3 m O 0 °oo°0°0 °o 01o .rv.m °o °o°o $$ ~S~om°~oa,o00°, °o re . m O ~ H S ~~~ N~ n W T~~ N N n .~i ~D 10 ~ v1 ~0 T N O C m O~ O n N h M M ~ m 0^~^ n N trt h N m 1O V1 T O 1p O N Oa ~/1 O V '"i {n~pp O pdpQ T N~ tC N .-~ N m O O t0 N~ N V1 h °-+ n O ei C O - N ~ N .n N ~ N ti '~ N ~ N N H W N N g ~ ~ ~ °o °o °o 0 00 o o g °o °o ro 0 0 S 10 °o r °o m ion. ~ oa, o oo, °o n 1o e°~ '- ~ , , , , o m o o .i o1 .+ .~ o n O n° rv n m m m , , 0 0 p0 0 0'i O O 8 10 n m oVV o 1D O Gp t0 m °m ~ ~^ •' '^ m ~ N ^' °1 ti rv 1° ro 1c o uNi 1o n .. m rNi m ~ ur ~D - m (ry~ 0 n W T .m-i N.M N N N V o ^1 h N h N N n nnq V1 N N '^ °G 01 .pi ~ V yp ~ p~ w M N N a0 L1 N N m VI Vf N O NN N N h N V! ~ 1 N l ~ N N v Q G O °o °o o °o °o g ~ .n. a °o °o g `~ °o n o °m ° ~ a o °o °o n m a O om0 O O n M vmf m A' O 0 O ~ W Ci ~ N .~ h u~ 001 W V iNi1 m N n b V ~ 10 1~ ^! O Q Q O N O n n m f1i O N 0~ N ~ ~ 1 v ti d . ym p N N~~ V, ~ ut N O~.^ n O O i1 an yr ~ t n N h N O V1 y~ N N V1 K b N _~ c d Q 3 ~ a " c W _ Z :°. ;Q 0 o ~ N c a r Z S ma, -~ o A'a .c t'i o r o '~ o N b o o .. au ~ ~. a ~~ ~ ° n c°° zv m c ~ ° a o u "' u a L 'Z'c a c .. G o f ~ - o o n E~ o ° N - o ~ c v o ~ m._ N a :~ °a m `~ , Evi ` ~ °' wl o ,& ` ` ~v i _ Q L q m ~ ~ z ~ H Ev° - ~ o ° ° ~ , `- n " o~ :G ~~ ~~ o 'o m c3 ~ ~= o- ~~~ N x.71 ~~ ' c ° L ~ Z N . y ~ m a c W- 0 3 o c w _ v~ c c a c ~- a~- U 0 u m « o o Q « o c o t; u '~ o_ O ~ o o c _ 07} - N g . a~- ~ _-- h°~ w ~ ' ^ O u 0 a o~ - ~ ~C E c ` ? n « R .+ N W d ~o ' _ _ ~ 2 - 2 m~ 1°~ 2 m 2 m v u a h F~ m y ~p C~ _ y° h 'o ~. w~ d~w~~~, m~~,°~a3 ~ ww ~ A , ~, o ~ ~ m z~ 9 O Z ~ VAIL, CHAMONIX ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 1-ALLEY & STREET 15-Jul-08 nocroioTinni nTV I INIT l1NIT COST TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 REMOVE ASPHALT 33717 SF $1.00 $33,717.00 REMOVE CURB 506 LF $12.00 $6,072.00 REMOVE LIGHT POLES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 REMOVE TREES 20 EA $175.00 $3,500.00 REMOVE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 EARTHWORK 18735 CY $20.00 $374,700.00 ASPHALT 2305 TON $65.00 $149,825.00 CURB AND GUTTER 2960 LF $35.00 $103,600.00 8" PVC (SAN.) 1092 LF $42.00 $45,864.00 SAN. MH 12 EA $5,000.00 $60,000.00 SAN. SVC. 25 EA $300.00 $7,500.00 CONNECT TO EX SANITARY 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8" PVC (WAT.) 1417 LF $35.00 $49,595.00 WATER SVC. 25 EA $650.00 $16,250.00 FH ASSEMBLY 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 FITTINGS 19 EA $500.00 $9,500.00 GATE VALVES 6 EA $1,200.00 $7,200.00 CONNECT TO EX WATER 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 RETAINING WALL 140 CY $600.00 $84,000.00 TOPSOIL STRIP 2911 CY $8.00 $23,288.00 TOPSOIL REPLACE 1265 CY $8.00 $10,120.00 TOTAL: $1,075,731.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $161,359.65 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%): $75,301.17 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL: $1,312,391.82 SUSTAINABILITY ALTERNATE DETENTION POND 3 EA $20,000.00 $60,000.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 EA $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL: $111,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $16,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%) $7,770.00 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE: $1,447,811.82 ASSUMPTIONS: 1. NO BASE COURSE UNDER PAVEMENT 2. 7" ASPHALT THICKNESS 3. WEIGHT OF ASPHALTTO BE 110 LB/SY/IN 4, 65' ON EACH WATER AND SANITARY SERVICE 5. ASSUME 1' THICK RETAINING WALLS AND 1' BELOW GRADE 6. PRICE OF DETENTION POND INCLUDES GRADING 7. PRICE OF OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES STRUCTURE AND AN ASSUMED LENGTH OF 100' OF 36" CMP CULVERT 8. 6" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL 9. 10% COMPACTION FACTOR FOR FILL VAIL, CHAMONIX CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 1-ALLEY & STREET 15-Jul-08 Description SF $/SF Total OPTION A Stick Built Construction 71,904 285 $20,492,640.00 Fire Staion Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option A Total $24,632,640.00 OPTION B Stick Built Construction 71,904 285 $20,492,640.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option B Total $26,067,840.00 OPTION C Modular Construction 71,904 205 $14,740,320.00 Fire Station Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option C Total $18,880,320.00 OPTION D Modular Construction 71,904 205 $14,740,320.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option D Total $20,315,520.00 Assumptions: Residential Square Footage: 71,904 Cost per SF (Stick Built): $285.00 Cost per SF (Modular): $205.00 Fire Station Square Footage: 2-Stories: 15,000 3rd Story: 5,200 Cost per SF (Firestation): $276.00 Fire Station Option 1 includes 2 stories. Fire Station Option 2 includes 2 stories plus a 3rd story dormitory. VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 1 -ALLEY & STREET 15-J u I-08 Description QTY. Unit Material ($) Inst. ($) Total PEDESTRIAN Concrete Sidewalk - 4" thick, 4' wide 15911 S.F. 7.4 11 $292,755.59 Flagstone - v3/4", gravel base, sand bedding 2512 S.F. 13.1 9,4 $56,513.03 Concrete Paver - 4"x8"x2 1/4" 0 S.F. 8.6 4.8 $0.00 Stairs - cast in place, 5 riser 0 EA. 223 505 $0.00 Pedestrian Subtotal $349,268.62 RETAINING WALLS Dry Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 0 L.F. 199 87.5 $0.00 Mortar Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 680 L.F. 199 77 $187,680,00 Retaining Wall55ubtotal $187,680.00 FENCING Vinyl Covered Chain Link - 4' 286 L.F. 4.87 1.65 $1,864.72 Fencing Subtotal $1,864.72. SITE LIGHTING double arm, 20' industrial 3 EA. 1425 1050 $7,425.00 Eurotique, Dark-Skies, 14', aluminum pole 10 EA. 2720 1000 $37,200.00 Li htin Subtotal $44,625.00 TRAFFIC CONTROLS Concrete Bollards 0 EA. 750 90 $0.00 High-Intensity Traffic Signage 6 EA. 55 13.65 $411.90 Traffic Control Subtotal $411.90 SITE FURNISHINGS Benches - 8', steel frame, fir seat 7 EA. 530 87.5 $4,322.50 Trash Receptacle - 30 gal. 7 EA. 300 15 $2,205.00 Site Furnishin Subtotal-. $6,527.50 IRRIGATION Pop Up Spray -18' Square 20136 S.F. 0.16 0.47 $12,685.68 Irr•i ation Subtotal $12,685.68 TREES AND SHRUBS Aspen (Populus tremuloides) 2" 60 EA. 269 $16,140.00 Gamble Oak (Quercus gambelii) #5 0 EA. 49 $0.00 Dogwood (Swida sericea) 3-4' 27 EA. 59 $1,593.00 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus)#5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Wood' s Rose (Rosa woodsii) #5 50 EA. 39.99 $1,999.50 Chokecherry (Padus virginiana) 2" 0 EA. 299 $0.00 Mountain Maple (Ater glabrum) 6-8' 10 EA. 199 $1,990.00 Narrowleaf Cottonwood (Populus angusttifolia) 2" 14 EA. 249 $3,486.00 Alder (Alnus incana) #15, 4' 10 EA. 119.99 $1,199.90 Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) #5 0 EA. 34.99 $0.00 Summit Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 1/2" 0 EA. 374 $0.00 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) 6' 18 EA. 299 $5,382.00 Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) 5' 0 EA. 219 $0.00 Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) #5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Juniper (Sabina monosperma) 5' 0 EA. 249 $0.00 Trees and Shrub Subtotal $31,790.40 Page 1 GROUND COVER Turf (bluegrass) 20136 S.F. 0.45 $9,061.02 Aspen Grass Seed Mix 15 lbs. 8 $120.00 Xeric Grass Seed Mix 0 lbs. 12 $0.00 Ground Cover Subtotal $9,181.02 Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) 4" std. Golden Aster (Heterotheca villosa) #1 Lupine (Lupinus argenteus) 10 cu. in. Goldenrod (Solidago app.) 10 cu. in. Firercracker Penstemon (Penstemon eatonii) 10 cu. In. 100 EA. 5.75 $575.00 100 EA. 6.75 $675.00 100 EA. 3.85 $385.00 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 HERBACEOUS Colorado Columbine (Aquilegia caerulea) 10 cu. in. Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana ssp. ovalis) 2.5" White Geranium (Geranium richardsontii)10 cu. in. Showy Daisy (Erigeron speciosus) Fnrhe R. Harharanue Subtotal 100 EA. 2.85 $285. 100 EA. 2.85 $285. 100 EA. 4.85 $485. 100 EA. 2.85 $285, 53.545, Tree Pits 6-7' Evergreen, 4'x1-3/4', 18 EA. 91.5 113 $3,681.00 7-9' Deciduous, 2-1/2'x1-1/2' 171 EA. 36.5 64.5 $17,271.00 Tree Pit Subtotal $20,952.00 TOTAL: $668,531.83 CONTINGENCY (15%): $100,279.77 TOTAL: $768,811.61 Page 2 a O ~ O c ~ m o = u ~? F z O °D r ~ xg z o S Q N f > ~ °008880 '".°+ °0°88°0.°x '^0 8°orwj, o'"+°o,$o °~8°~ 8~ °o n 8~8~~~ ~ o$ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ .n ~ N N N N .n N N ~ N N N N ~ ~ N N .mJ' N 3 D O 6 O n M :N O O O O O O O O p°p ~ e b° u°i 8 O wl N y N~ TO ° ~ ~ N m $~ o ° ~ .n .n ~ N '~ ~ O eal p N"~ S ONS N N N `o a o° m .A . i~ ~n w N .-~ n. `^ ;N '^ .n v. o°o°o°°o°o v'.a+ o~ ~ °~ °oo°e °o .°r 8So'^~~ ~°o a4 w ~ m8e° m o°m v°i e~ v vi ..: is ro~ '" 'Qy e _ h ^'^ ~ d' m ~ ov~i $.'vi~ Vim. N~ N a~ .n an h N N N N N ~ Yl N N N N U O O 0 0 S n m N a0 O 00 O S O O N A 8W T8'"O~ °W8 W p p m~`^mW q p Q VV N U O N N~ .A N T ~ N N N ~ N H N N NN O of N N N ~ °OOOB°oo~'".°+, °0°088°0 ,°. $ °o oe ^. n °8 °~°oo.' YEr = 8 me°8oo~°on g°o ~~ p ~°rv 8 g ~~~e Ma3 n ° ~M N "'a ~m ~ N °"'~N v. .~ .n ~~ ~ .n .~ h h N N N N N H ~ ~ p M N O O 88oeeen"'.'i 8 88 o'"+O~om Pn$o.'"i t'~ O Nm 8° N O O b^ 8 W ° n O b~ ~rv b 8 N ~ N m O O Vi ri N N N N V 1 O~ N M ~. ~ 1p p1 a n N N V°I ° NhN ~M p p~ 0 f O O v~ N ~ N 'n "/~ N N b M M y °088 8$~'^.°.~ o°°$°o°.°+ °o°o, 8 0'^, ~°+ "~ m = i° 8m m~.°i^o~ N~ n m °oeoeOO&~ g8 ~ ~^~'~^ m.°. m~ w ~3 ~ m o .n v. vi o ti ~ M. ~ '" '~' N "~ N N v, .n ~ ~ v. 'm °w°w, N '^ ~^ N '^ N .~. 3 a `o 0 88°oe°o8~'".°. S°o $ °o mon mo~ ~ ~8°~~~^o$ °,8 ~ I v H~ °° m a O O .n ... v'"i o :° vni m N N H N N N .n .n N ~ p ° .~ 'a 3 ~ i m ~ m z~ ~ o ~mv ~ m o~ o , u 0 ~ c E - - E p = b °~ ZNam=v'~"-vim ° ~`_~t~~8 ~o° ~o°~z ~o o°~z~2 ?'° r3 ~m-~q~ ; 'o c ._ g _ `o m W a ~ u e ~- `- •c - rqi H G ~ a Z- V m o t' «° u ~' c o ~ a z~ z `m z u _ _ g v _ _ v ,~, u ~ ' v 'n ~ e m ° u m ~f ~v, u. E c wg '~oo,rv, v', A ~ N . z~m iY ~^ is ~9 m~ 9 F~ °~ .J o io.zLL V ~~ O z ~ o ~ 0 0~- o~- o~ LL o f LL 5 3 ~ VAII, CHAMONIX ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 2 -VILLAGE & NEIGHBORHOOD 15-Jul-08 DESCRIPTION OTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 REMOVE ASPHALT 33717 SF $1.00 $33,717.00 REMOVE CURB 506 LF $12.00 $6,072.00 REMOVE LIGHT POLES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 REMOVE TREES 20 EA $175.00 $3,500.00 REMOVE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 EARTHWORK 22526 CY $20.00 $450,520.00 CUT 19952 CY FILL 2574 CY ASPHALT 2201 TON $65.00 $143,065.00 CURB AND GUTTER 2688 LF $35.00 $94,080.00 8" PVC (SAN.) 1134 LF $42.00 $47,628.00 SAN. MH 10 EA $5,000.00 $50,000.00 SAN. SVC. 20 EA $300.00 $6,000.00 CONNECT TO EX SANITARY 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8" PVC (WAT.) 1169 LF $35.00 $40,915.00 WATER SVC. 20 EA $650.00 $13,000.00 FH ASSEMBLY 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000.00 FITTINGS 15 EA $500.00 $7,500.00 GATE VALVES 3 EA $1,200.00 $3,600.00 CONNECT TO EX WATER 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 RETAINING WALL 91 CY $600.00 $54,600.00 TOPSOIL STRIP 2911 CY $8.00 $23,288.00 TOPSOIL REPLACE 1265 CY $8.00 $10,120.00 TOTAL: $1,080,105.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $162,015.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%): $75,607.35 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL: $1,317,728.10 SUSTAINABLILITYAUERNATE DETENTION POND 3 EA $20,000.00 $60,000.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 EA $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL: $111,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $16,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%) $7,770.00 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE: $1,453,148.10 ASSUMPTIONS: 1. NO BASE COURSE UNDER PAVEMENT 2. 7" ASPHALT THICKNESS 3. WEIGHT OF ASPHALT TO BE 110 LB/SY/IN 4. 65' ON EACH WATER AND.SANITARY SERVICE 5. ASSUME 1' THICK RETAINING WALLS AND 1' BELOW GRADE 6. PRICE OF DETENTION POND INCLUDES GRADING 7. PRICE OF OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES STRUCTURE AND AN ASSUMED LENGTH OF 100' OF 36" CMP CULVERT 8. 6" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL 9. 10%COMPACTION FACTOR FOR FILL VAIL, CHAMONIX COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 2 -VILLAGE & NEIGHBORHOOD 15-Jul-08 Description SF $/SF Total OPTION A Stick Built Construction 90,665 320 $29,012,800.00 Fire Staion Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option A Total $33,152,800.00 OPTION B Stick Built Construction 90,665 320 $29,012,800.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option B Total $34,588,000.00 OPTION C Modular Construction 90,665 240.29 $21,785,892.85 Fire Station Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option C Total $25,925,892.85 OPTION D Modular Construction 90,665 240.29 $21,785,892.85 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option D Total $27,361,092.85 Assumptions: Residential Square Footage: Cost per SF (Stick Built): Cost per SF (Modular): Fire Station Square Footage: 2-Stories: 3rd Story: Cost per SF (Firestation): Fire Station Option 1 includes 2 stories. Fire Station Option 2 includes 2 stories plug 90,665 $320.00 $240.29 15,000 5,200 $276.00 a 3rd story dormitory VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 2 -VILLAGE & NEIGHBORHOOD 15-J u I-08 Description QTY. Unit Material ($) Inst. ($) Total PEDESTRIAN Concrete Sidewalk - 4" thick, 4' wide 12762 S.F. 7.4 11 $234,822.09 Flagstone - v3/4", gravel base, sand bedding 2512 S. F. 13.1 9.4 $56,513.03 Concrete Paver - 4"x8"x2 1/4" 15921 S.F. 8.6 4.8 $213,347.83 Stairs - cast in place, 5 riser 0 EA. 223 505 $0.00 Pedestrian Subtotal $504,682.95 RETAINING WALLS Dry Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 0 L.F. 199 87.5 $0.00 Mortar Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 751 L.F. 199 77 $207,276.00 Retaining. Walls Subtotal $207,276.00 FENCING Vinyl Covered Chain Link - 4' 197 L.F. 4.87 1.65 $1,284.64 Fencing Subtotal $1,284.64 SITE LIGHTING double arm, 20' industrial 3 EA. 1425 1050 $7,425.00 Eurotique, Dark-Skies, 14', aluminum pole 10 EA. 2720 1000 $37,200.00 Li htingSubtotaF $44,625.00 TRAFFIC CONTROLS Concrete Bollards 2 EA. 750 90 $1,680.00 High-Intensity Traffic Signage 6 EA. 55 13.65 $411.90 Traffic ControlSubtotal $2,091.90 SITE FURNISHINGS Benches - 8', steel frame, fir seat 7 EA. 530 87.5 $4,322.50 Trash Receptacle - 30 gal. 7 EA. 300 15 $2,205.00 Site Furnishin Subtotal ' $6,527.50 IRRIGATION Pop Up Spray - 18' Square 20564 S.F. 0.16 0.47 $12,955.32 kri ation Subtotal $12,955.32 TREES AND SHRUBS Aspen (Populus tremuloides) 2" 0 EA. 269 $0.00 Gamble Oak (Quercus gambelii) #5 30 EA. 49 $1,470.00 Dogwood (Swida sericea) 3-4' 0 EA. 59 $0.00 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus)#5 25 EA. 37.99 $949.75 Wood' s Rose (Rosa woodsii) #5 0 EA. 39.99 $0.00 Chokecherry (Padus virginiana) 2" 20 EA. 299 $5,980.00 Mountain Maple (Acer glabrum) 6-8' 15 EA. 199 $2,985.00 Narrowleaf Cottonwood (Populus angusttifolia) 2" 11 EA. 249 $2,739.00 Alder (Alnus incana) #15, 4' 18 EA. 119.99 $2,159.82 Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) #5 0 EA. 34.99 $0.00 Summit Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 1/2" 15 EA. 374 $5,610.00 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) 6' 0 EA. 299 $0.00 Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) 5' 26 EA. 219 $5,694.00 Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) #5 50 EA. 37.99 $1,899.50 Juniper (Sabina monosperma) 5' 15 EA. 249 $3,735.00 Trees and Shrub-Subtotal- $33,222.07 Page 1 GROUND COVER Turf (bluegrass) Aspen Grass Seed Mix Xeric Grass Seed Mix 20564 S. F. 0.45 $9,253.76 0 lbs. 8 $0.00 10 lbs. 12 $120.00 Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) 4" std. 100 EA. 5.75 $575.00 Golden Aster (Heterotheca villosa) #1 0 EA. 6.75 $0.00 Lupine (Lupinus argenteus) 10 cu. in. 50 EA. 3.85 $192.50 Goldenrod (Solidago app.) 10 cu. in. 0 EA. 2.85 $0.00 Firercracker Penstemon (Penstemon eatonii) 10 cu. In. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 $0.00 HERBACEOUS $0.00 Colorado Columbine (Aquilegia caerulea) 10 cu. in. 0 EA. 2.85 $0.00 Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana ssp. ovalis) 2.5" 0 EA. 2.85 $0.00 White Geranium (Geranium richardsontii) 10 cu. in. 0 EA. 4.85 $0.00 Showy Daisy (Erigeron speciosus) 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 foirbs & Herbaceous Subtotal $1,337.50 Tree Pits 6-7' Evergreen, 4'x1-3/4', 91 EA. 91.5 113 $18,609.50 7-9' Deciduous, 2-1/2'x1-1/2' 134 EA. 36.5 64.5 $13,534.00 Tree Pit`Subtotal $32,143.50 TOTAL: $855,520 CONTINGENCY (15%): $128,328 TOTAL: Page 2 f rc O p0 O O °C r m x~ z o z a m Q = o L °oo°o °o rv o°on eg ° o°0 8 y°o,eomv°immrvov°~ ^ , , o p O N g g b n A 0 0 ~ 4j p S °N V y ~G .Pi b m t~ ~°0 77FF C ° n 0 ^~ N N Q Q ~ rv m N N N ~~ pp ~ N N N N N N N M N O N N N N N . i O l N N N N N N N N 10 N O 0 O °OO°o °v "'n S °o$ ^O°'° °~'° no~°n, °o, v"i, 'a i, a~ v do ~ oumi ° ~ $$ e nNn3 ~ g ^C D O O .:gymm N N ~^n N N N N ~"q V O N N~~ N N ~g Cpp N N N N N N N N m M ut. N 0 0 0 0 ~ O o n o° a O v°1 o vii N rv rv 0 ~ ~ O o$ o~ O~ O O O ~ C qp~ C 1p T O ~°D r Q m ~ N w ~ ~~ ~ .`Oi~ a v'^i H ~ NN r rJ "'~ N m m N N N N N.~ nH ~. : N N N N N N ~ . NN N V O O o~ ~o~ ~ a8e~~~~ w ~ NN ^~ 'a NNN~N NNN N N0° NN ~, `o O N N L'i N ~~yy 1I~ y~ 008$°oo°c .rvn o°o°o,°o°n o°o 8 ~$eo8° ^' ~kl $ A Q $~8°^ ~S~ 888eF~ $ ~ ~^N^°$8 '~ NN .^~+e`~ N N ° a NNN ~ N NNN N N ~ N N N N N a a N N h TT N. mm T N 3 m O O °o°°o°o .rvnn °o °og q ~°oe m rvg°O°v'~i.n q. ~ °m°^ ° ° N Q Q 3 ocurvi m$~°u ~^a .°nn~ K m o .i~ N N N N a o, N ~ N~N n$ N N N N :`~ .R O N N N N N N ~' N N N N N A °o °° o °o °o, 8 ° m n °~m°m o~ °o °o °o °o r oS8~~a °o °o oa g ~ ~ r°o e N '°m ~ m m rv N e~~rv^N~°g" rv~ c vi d rv ri m N^ ~. m^ N~ N n m N N N N ~ N N N N N N N N 'w rv N N N N N N N a 0 O w 0 0 0 8 0 m I O O ~ ~ ~ 0! pp ~i O N T M 0 0 8 Q qp O n n Q M ~ $ ~ b VI ~ a O O N N N ~~/ f O~ N N N N N = f H N N N N N N N ~ q N 1 e MVr Z o v ~ ~ ~; z ~ m c 2~ ' ~ c ° ~ `o q c o o -F ~ ~ mm~ u a v . . u` l3 ad ~ ~ l«,~ O c o o o c.9 „~° o z C tl p o S~ ? ° ~'= a '$ ° p - o m m u ~ c3 ~ - au ~ ~~ z °m~` v m-`w v u c ; ~'s~ z~ u o ~ uo° ~o z V o ~o zp = N q z. u~ _ A-amd c v ~ r ii w~ ~ ` m c ° c e ~:~ ~ Z 9- Z e Z'_ Z~ 4 ~ ~s n ~ c a - v~ v m ~ ~ W g ~ ~wW E .,o o.~NNa om Om m z~~ ~ o ~ o mg ~ a ~ v oazLL V~ ~S~ i=1~u°ro " z b ~. r. Z S 5 r - °o~ oh - ofLL o~~ ; 5 o VAII, CHAMONIX COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 3 -NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER 15-1u1-OS DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 REMOVE ASPHALT 33717 SF $1.00 $33,717.00 REMOVE CURB 506 LF $12.00 $6,072.00 REMOVE LIGHT POLES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 REMOVE TREES 20 EA $175.00 $3,500.00 REMOVE ELECTRIC PEDESTAL 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 EARTHWORK 17449 CY $20.00 $348,980.00 CUT 12184 CY FILL 5265 CY ASPHALT 1749 TON $65.00 $113,685.00 CURB AND GUTTER 2412 SF $35.00 $84,420.00 SIDEWALK 8168 SF $12.00 $98,016.00 8" PVC (SAN.) 1154 LF $42.00 $48,468.00 SAN. MH 11 EA $5,000.00 $55,000.00 SAN. SVC. 22 EA $300.00 $6,600.00 CONNECT TO EX SANITARY 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8" PVC (WAT.) 1258 LF $35.00 $44,030.00 WATER SVC. 22 EA $650.00 $14,300.00 FH ASSEMBLY 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 FITTINGS 22 CY $500.00 $11,000.00 GATE VALVES 7 EA $1,200.00 $8,400.00 CONNECT TO EX WATER 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 RETAINING WALL 28.8 CY $600.00 $17,280.00 TOPSOIL STRIP 2911 CY $8.00 $23,288.00 TOPSOIL REPLACE 1265 CY $8.00 $10,120.00 TOTAL: $1,014,376.00 CONTINGENCY: $152,156.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES: $71,006.32 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL: $1,237,538.72 SUSTAINABILITY ALTERNATE DETENTION POND 3 EA $20,000.00 $60,000.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 EA $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL: $111,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%): $16,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES (7%) $7,770.00 (SURVEY AND GEOTECH) TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE: $1,372,958.72 ASSUMPTIONS: 1. NO BASE COURSE UNDER PAVEMENT 2. 7" ASPHALT THICKNESS 3. WEIGHT OF ASPHALT TO BE 110 LB/SY/IN 4. 65' ON EACH WATER AND SANITARY SERVICE 5. ASSUME 1' THICK RETAINING WALLS AND 1' BELOW GRADE 6. PRICE OF DETENTION POND INCLUDES GRADING 7. PRICE OF OUTLET STRUCTURE INCLUDES STRUCTURE AND AN ASSUMED LENGTH OF 100' OF 36" CMP CULVERT 8. 6" DEPTH OF TOPSOIL 9. 10% COMPACTION FACTOR FOR FILL VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 3 -NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER 15-1u1-08 Description SF $/SF Total OPTION A Stick Built Construction 85,440 285 $24,350,400.00 Fire Staion Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option A Total $28,490,400.00 OPTION B Stick Built Construction 85,440 285 $24,350,400.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option B Total $29,925,600.00 OPTION C Modular Construction 85,440 205 $17,515,200.00 Fire Station Option 1 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 Option C Total $21,655,200.00 OPTION D Modular Construction 85,440 205 $17,515,200.00 Fire Station Option 2 2 Story component 15,000 276 $4,140,000.00 3rd Story dormitory 5,200 276 $1,435,200.00 Option D Total $23,090,400.00 Assumptions: Residential Square Footage: Cost per SF (Stick Built): Cost per SF (Modular): Fire Station Square Footage: 2-Stories: 3rd Story: Cost per SF (Firestation): Fire Station Option 1 includes 2 stories. Fire Station Option 2 includes 2 stories 85, 440 $285.00 $205.00 15, 000 5, 200 $276.00 plus a 3rd story dormitory VAIL, CHAMONIX LANDSCAPING COST ESTIMATE SCHEME 3 -NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER 15-J u1-08 Description QTY. Unit Material ($) Inst. ($) Total PEDESTRIAN Concrete Sidewalk - 4" thick, 4' wide 8452 S.F. 7.4 11 $155,515.70 Flagstone - v3/4", gravel base, sand bedding 16850 S.F. 13.1 9.4 $379,126.58 Concrete Paver - 4"x8"x2 1/4" 0 S.F. 8.6 4.8 $0.00 Stairs -cast in place, 5 riser 0 EA. 223 505 $0.00 Pedestrian Subtotal $534,642.27 RETAINING WALLS Dry Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6"thick 0 L.F. 199 87.5 $0.00 Mortar Set - to 6', $250/ton, 1'6" thick 642 L.F. 199 77 $177,192.00 Retaining Walls Subtotal $177,192.00 FENCING Vinyl Covered Chain Link - 4' 343 L.F. 4.87 1.65 $2,237.66 Fencing Subtota( $2,237.66 SITE LIGHTING double arm, 20' industrial 3 EA. 1425 1050 $7,425.00 Eurotique, Dark-Skies, 14', aluminum pole 10 EA. 2720 1000 $37,200.00 Lighting Subtotal $44,625.00 TRAFFIC CONTROLS Concrete Bollards 0 EA. 750 90 $0.00 High-Intensity Traffic Signage 6 EA. 55 13.65 $411.90 Traffic Control Subtotal $411.90 SITE FURNISHINGS Benches - 8', steel frame, fir seat 7 EA. 530 87.5 $4,322.50 Trash Receptacle - 30 gal. 7 EA. 300 15 $2,205.00 SiteFurnishin .Subtotal '$6,527.50 IRRIGATION Pop Up Spray -18' Square 34722 S.F. 0.16 0.47 $21,874.86 Irrigation Subtotal $21,874.86 TREES AND SHRUBS Aspen (Populus tremuloides) 2" 62 EA. 269 $16,678.00 Gamble Oak (Quercus gambelii) #5 0 EA. 49 $0.00 Dogwood (Swida sericea) 3-4' 0 EA. 59 $0.00 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus)#5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Wood' s Rose (Rosa woodsii) #5 50 EA. 39.99 $1,999.50 Chokecherry (Padus virginiana) 2" 0 EA. 299 $0.00 Mountain Maple (Ater glabrum) 6-8' 9 EA. 199 $1,791.00 Narrowleaf Cottonwood (Populus angusttifolia) 2" 14 EA. 249 $3,486.00 Alder (Alnus incana) #15, 4' 18 EA. 119.99 $2,159.82 Serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) #5 0 EA. 34.99 $0.00 Summit Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 1/2" 0 EA. 374 $0.00 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) 6' 21 EA. 299 $6,279.00 Pinyon Pine (Pinus edulis) 5' 0 EA. 219 $0.00 Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamrius spp.) #5 0 EA. 37.99 $0.00 Juniper (Sabina monosperma) 5' 0 EA. 249 $0.00 Trees and Shrub Subtotal $32,393.32 Page 1 IOUND COVER rf (bluegrass) 34722 S.F. 0.45 $15,624.72 pen Grass Seed Mix 10 lbs. 8 $80.00 ric Grass Seed Mix 0 lbs. 12 $0,00 eund Cover Subtotal $15,704.72 Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja spp.) 4" std. 100 EA. 5.75 $575.00 Golden Aster (Heterotheca villosa) #1 100 EA. 6.75 $675.00 Lupine (Lupinus argenteus) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 3.85 $385.00 Goldenrod (Solidago app.) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Firercracker Penstemon (Penstemon eatonii) 10 cu. In. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 HERBACEOUS Colorado Columbine (Aquilegia caerulea) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana ssp. ovalis) 2.5" 100 EA. 2.85 $285.00 White Geranium (Geranium richardsontii) 10 cu. in. 100 EA. 4.85 $485.00 Showy Daisy (Erigeron speciosus) 100 EA. $0.00 Forbs & Herbaceous Subtotal $3,260.00 Tree Pits 6-7' Evergreen, 4'x1-3/4', 21 EA. 91.5 113 $4,294.50 7-9' Deciduous, 2-1/2'x1-1/2' 153 EA. 36.5 64.5 $15,453.00 Tree Pit Subtotal- $19,747.50 TOTAL: $858,616.74 CONTINGENCY (15%): $128,792.51 TOTAL: $987,409.25 Page 2 Q f f o ~ O m X w ~ a Z~ J ~ O a > N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~D .ni W 0 0 0 0 0 b O O O W O N O T .°it ~O V, 0 0 0 0 n N N '- a Oi C O .+ '1 0 O1 m 0 0 0 0 0' N n n n o 0 0 rv O °o °o W O$ N ti ut O~ N N N O~ ~ m YI - 0 m o o N m v i m O n o n N I A ° n m ~ O O O m n ' V ~ m O Y~ p O ry m m N ~p N .i ~ N N ay{ vi app N N '~ « N~ o ~O ~. 1~rl a N N O n ' -1 a M N~ N N N ~ 1~ N N N N ,.j. N N N ,y N N .g. N N N N N 3 O O O ° ° 0 0 ~n ro ° ° °o °o °o "b ° ~ °a o o° °o °o n o ~o °o `~ °o °m e o 0 + o o, °oro°°o rym°iom ° ° ~ ~ ° , ..rv~o .y ~' rvm a rv~w~ ~ n° ° wi n on m o o N +v i n ~~n c . ~ n m N O ti i V M ~ . i m h h h .~ n ma M O O V an ~ /1 N v t 1 N N "~ Ul N v p p v n N N N N N N ~ n N V R N N O '- 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 .n-~ W ~ G ~ ~ O O O O O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 ° ~D O r 0 O°~ ~ b a 0 0 0 0 n 1~D n n N N M `~ °J ° ~ m N YI A °on°o °n r°i "' °mm °o°o°o~ " o m m nm rveQ oo a v i ~ rv~n mm c o m o °n n n ~ .n .~'i~ ,^ ~°-~ .ni. ~ .n '°v\ a ~ °' m ~'{i. ~ ~ v`Oi `" o ~ N v. N n + 3 ~ yi N ~n N N N N 3 V N N O O °o °o °o °o °o, °o, ~c .nj aNq o o .. m .~ a o o 0 ° ° m °o °o g o o Q o o N o N o n a. ~ o o °m v°i ~n °o 0 o r°o, °o, n m `° m v°~ rv .~ ° ~ ^ ^' ~ n ~ va i o m a " u n ° 0 n rv n m m h N O n W O ~0 H~ ;~ m n ti ~ ^ v i i + s `p p v o r°~ m W 1/~ N N H N N N V1 h ti M1 N N ~ N {b p! 01 C O ti N ~ eel h N a ~ Val Vf N N O O O o ~ N 0 O 0 N O o 0 O O o O O O p S N O° N O N O O O O n n 1p ~0 O O O O O m O°T y~ N •-_ 0 0 ~ 00 O o o ~-+ ~ .r 0 O O O4 o 0 0 0 0~ o o ~ , 1 ~ °m ~ rv n ~' °m m a ~ rv .~+ ~ ~ c °o nOO °r°vn °m m a m o ^ ~ ~ vi ~ °o°o °o ~o neq o .~. ~ °o° o~ aq n ~ m~cn ~nm of c n .: o 'g' m o0 aQ .nN o vim N N t/! N N N N N v c ~~ ~v, ~N N 3 m C h M O O ° °o oN ° o ° ° ~ n °o °o °o g ~ °o n °o °m ° ~ °v o °o °o ° r e a o , q o o o, - y ° ro °o o n m~ m~ ° , ~ ° ° ~ ~' n~ n 'i e n °~° ~i m n a0 N i w `V m o n o n a ni o v N n ~ ~' N N N o .. ~n m o ~ a ° o ~ ? ~ ~ 33 ~ N m o ~ N w v~ ~X .n v. .Nip ° O .-~ C O t/R N N ~~ N N w N N N N N N O 0 0 g~ .n+ aq 0 0 0 0 °o ° $ °o o m o °o o °0 8 ~ °o n °o °m °~ °a, o °o o ~ u ._ a , , ooi 'im,-. oo ono°o °o ~mm°mm n , ooooo~ oo°OO g~cnm o ~°0 QQ 3 mo~~~n ., ~n~~Nrv a~..ii ~~ ~co~ior m ~aq u~i ~o C - vi N N m O n n - N u n n N QQ 0mmp ~ N m N .n m N N N N r N to v~ m O~ N N N N H N N N m N ~~ N N Vii 0 0 N N ~ N N i N N N N V N h H N N N 3 a O O °o °o °o o °o $ ~ ~ m °o °o g `" °o ~' °o °m .°n ~ °a o °o °o n ~~o, a ° rvnM ° ° ° r°O $o ~ rv~$~., vim~~`" noq ~o ~~ ~o m g ° n m r ii o O o n `O n o m ° a b h~~~ N.n ~ o Y a G O . i . v~.n i~ N N N N . . rv Uai N N h V1 N N N O z A C `v Q o ° 3 ~ ~ a v V ~ ~a a z ~e ~ 2 ~ h - c ~ " << < ' i c v 3 ~ . ~ ° A ~ v~ m ~' v w v w~ '~ ` ' Z ~ °" ~ o o E ~ o G o o E c = '" m ~°° u G ~ V u O~ 1- d j ~0 m~; a m.a .~ ~Oa ` Q d r' N ~ ~o'L~~~ Z h 'N H O O V ~ - r O N O ~~ Ti o o ~ ~ m Y C_ D V S p z =cnS ~c t C o y~ v o 3 o c w m .c a° y 'c ~, c q ,-~~ •c m y W u u o a= $ m `o_ ~' z 2 ~_ ~ c oY n u u o_ o ~ co_ Z a 2 o Z m v~ - W m ° vatl a-m 5 5 _~ «. c~ v .~ ~ w o w .m d o~ v c ~ ~ i p v ?~ 'vi w` w E c c c W _,mw~., o « o Q ._ ~ ~m c p m ti p m~ m FY Z~ p m p' ~ om G am v¢ LL ~ F N_ r l7 ~° r` y~ Z ~~ F Z ~ _ o~ `o~ F o~LL o~LL 5 r°- C a o ~Oo f = N P' N m x u ~? F z O °~ ~ ~ xg 2 f ~ a ~ lzi f > ~ a 8S "' S~ ° ~ °8~ ~SeB° '" ~ m g~~ a$ ~° ~ o °o ~ n~ m vi 1 ~ ~ N H ~ p~ y O O NNNN V1 ~n an N~ ~ r I~ ~. , h~ ~ N ~ V N N V~ ~ ~ ~I .~ N O O O g°o°o °o gn'".°. °o w°o8 °o 'a~ m°°~°c. °o a°~. o".l .°~ °` ° o N o m'b'o~~ °08$ ~ •, m ~ naN~.,ov~i IS gm o ~ o ~D m~ e m Bo~S~ °~ ~ .n ~ ~ m o ~ J O .n .~, - + N N N N v~ N N h N ~ N N p T fV '~ Z a 0 0 0 0 0 0 n~~ yyyy{ O^° n~ ,E .~i ~ n.. ° O O O O O H p G O O N o~ ~ O W O N.. ~r T O ~0 O m Y°i, 0 0 H b c0 r~i < N m y N n ° ~ N n N n - nm ~ O w~ m. p p~ °rN~N '~'0 H H •n Q @ 3 $ .n ~n v i T H h h N N N .n YN1 N p1 N N N N N U O O °o°oo°o°o m°y in OO m ~ ~°o°o°m ~°ngo: .~ + w o~ m o~ m ~ ~. g m3 ! ~ 3 u .n .n N ~.~ 'a^ ~ ;°n {i _ ~ ~ v. v v. .n .n .n N ~ e~ ' X 6 O v~ vs N n . BooSoB~m~ i °oooo.~ $ 0 O ~+ mg~om v°igo. m ° ~p °°° m rv m o o ~°D h ~p 0 0 0 On .~-1 O W 8~ QQ S p Cp ~ rv~ m CO .o o vi ~ _ NNE o m vi ri N ~ N ~. a n ~ g ~N~~ .nH .n N~. N N N H N N h h p q M r O O 8 m o v a# mS°'° $R 8° 8 ~~~~~ o~ '~^ ~ ~ o ti ~ O ~ .n .n H .n r~ N ti .n r~ .n .n .n = oO1o~°o~°mM.~.a~ oS~e~~ 8S 8 W mn~~ri ~~ uNi ~ e c m ri ~~ ~a~~m vr~ N ^~ $N~~.'"n ~~ ~ ~ a H N R b N N N N ~ te te~~ N a 0 O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 n~ n p S ~ O b m 0 n O N N . O n ~n N O ~°O ~ W p O S O Q n~ N m O rv~ ~ 1~~ a H vN f H N H O N ~n v~ N N N ~ N N M ~w' F & ~ ° 3 ~' a v ~ 2 ~ r H N O A ~ a s ~ r u o f ~. a~x v~ m V Z A r `o ~ a => Y Low Z A n Y ' `o ~ `g a E ~ ° .. Z N~ o ao ~ o <o "o° C U~ U ° ° o~ .. o ~i ~o°°,, t ° - i s a ".4 ~ 3 _ ~ a ~ c n z g ~"~ ~„ ~ 9~ a O q c _ v C > O y~ -_ u- -c Z ~.. ~ ~ Z~ zb z n O~ ~ O m O m Z O~ ~ - f .n w w E c ~ w ~ n 0 0 ~ ~ g „~ ° ° ' f G u rc LL _ ° ~ w o ~ LL o o ~ - o ~ - c ~ - o 5 ~ - 2 z f N ~~y O r = O p ~ m x = z o z Q m aa~ i ~ s, o$o m" s8$oS.~ sob ~$es° ~ No~oN~ ~ _ S o~ oSo~~~ ~~ ^°~S~ ~~ ~~ ~n ~ e~ N N ~n N N riM ~ ~~~ ~ ~n ~n N ~+ ~ N N 3 D O 6 O o$$°$gga°,mn ° oo~ a°om ~r'~ °~j °o o%o v`°io~ ~ $°$ , a ^' n$ rqi O ~ ~n N V O - p ~n N yy N ~% N N H N ~n N ° S° 0 0 0° N n O O S O O r O O O N S b O N~~ m N v°i O u1 N N C N N N N N N H N N ~ M N ~p H d N N N ~n N m N N N N N N N ~ N ry N 3 U O O a °P° om O~eoa~. N $°o ~ p m~~°o ^3. rai v vi v N .: n .i r~ .n .n '" .°y u .n n ~n co ~ .i N N . ~n .n N.~ :°R _ a O .n .n h w d 8 °o $ o °o, o° m " o s °o °o l:. ° ° $ ~ o o°. 'A ~ m M '" $ o fn $ a o°On~°nm a°o~ 88s~~~ 88 2' , , rv,-~i:om~°~ n.~{ `~ ~n N ~ N N ti ~ N N N m N m O O °o°o,°o °amn ° ° °o, ~y gQ. °v o° 0 3 ~s$o~m e °~ "' n ~ m ° m N~'Ha v"'i v~ .^i~ r m ~~~ .'~'. ~i .n ~n v~ .n :~. ,Q O ~n N ~n an m. h H v~ N h N N y °o °o, g °o, °o °o °a m n °o o g °o o°O n $ °o $g rv °o ~ °o ° ~°n w m ~ u'", n ~ ro m ° m I~ O M ~ p p O O O b r A O 8 0 Q , ~ Op V ~G ti ~ n n Q ~ pp M _ vi 'O n m ~~ v, N.n .i n N .n.~ .n'^ O q „y'' N ~ ti N~ g S N N N N N p~ ~~ ~ ~~ e~~ e N N N a O O 0 0 0 N n pp O u1 ~ W m Y~ N P ~ ~pp O 'T Q O 8 Q y S N o n V a .n ~n N O n N N pq Cq QQ ~n ~n ~n n n q ~ O G O H N N N N N ~ a N ~~ YI Q f~l F Y o 3 ~ _ v z .~ ~~`° ~ , 3 u ~ o~ "c 3 mZ.~ v ~ ou c g.. ~ - ° c ° `a .y `o °S ~ ~" N - co u a o c m c° u m °~ ~.a ~y EN r a .. ~ « c as = •z ` L c ~° o o ~? G o o E~ o -° c •. o «. ~° E$'~ ° ° 66 ° o O - o ~ c3 ~ >~ c~~, L _ ~A ~ v v~ $' o~ ~~~ ~o „z ~o ~0 ~ G ~o z__ rV ~"~ ~A~ m W ? E N w w E e - W C o 0 ,A '~ ~ v~+ O m O m m O~ O- a s ~ m " ~~ LL o u~~~ s a z ~~~~ 6 ~~~ _ s z o $ ~ _ ~y €a n ~ °° ' ° w _ ~~a ~ ~ $ o ~- o ~- o f LL o f LL ° 5 0 0 0 0 c V N O O OD ~ ~r~.- ~ n~~`- r-. 1 ~' J -n rn T ~ ~ ~ O W r r -ri rn ~ = rn ~ cn C ~ ~„ D Z ~ ~ Z 1 `~ \ `~ _ 1 7 rt J 0 N n fl C ~• c~ c __ ~. Z r ® ~ ~~i~~~ ^' __ 8 D ° ~~ n ~ ___ ___- ~ ~ Uu1' ~ ~ O Z < rn r 2 ~ pD rn ~ ~° 2 J v~ b C~ s ~~ o N -~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ,, , -'~'- n ~~ s ~a - ~~ ,a a ~c _cn A 0 n ~~ a ~ N O ~a .~ o= on ,. ~' ` ,4',', ! ' `' ~ ~ ,: `;` ~ ~_ l i=; ~~' rli~. I. ,, ; `r; i~ ~ 'i~ ,~, ~ , ,'o 4i 1',~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ j ® o ~ ~_ V N O O Oo ~~- w. 1Jj '/ ff~1 A ~~ ~ w~ ~~ - n c~ .. r ;a ~~ m ~~ ^~ n a~ y u n m' L .~ o Cn A n .~ ~' m ~ ~ O ~ /~ < 0 ~D r T rn ~ = rn ~ cn C ~ ~„ D z0 ~ z ~D n _ _., rt ~. ~-~~ , ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ,-~, o o ~ ~ ~ _ r.; ; ~5 t/7 ~D n ~ 0 o_ ~ 0 ~~ o ~ ~ X17 C O O ~~ A _. F d ~. r n. W . 2 6 3 r q< ~ 1y _~.-1`a4 ~~ /" ~ ` ~~ ~-~- ~~,~ ~ ~5. ,, :;,~, m~ r. 1 ,4 -;: ~, ' -.. \~ 1 ;i ~ t- .°,, ~ ~ ` ,~j ° g ~...~. F ~ ~`~ ~'C ~`~ - -- r + ~:~} -' . ; ~.' ~ ~ t". -~ .r ~~- 1 f i ~ '~ L i i ~ , ; ~ ~ ; x ; °,,,t~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ a ''. ~ -' .~ ~{ • :j Cp l ~~ ' f ~ i ~ I ~'; ~~~ ,, ': 7 .. ~ti~ , ~ :2,. ~ ~ u ~ : ~:.. i• •' . ~~ ~~ I~ ~. 4 i r C ~r, ~4 r ~, 1 4 O ~' 'J t: ~1~; ~f ~ ~ ___ ,: !~ I .. •i• t ' ° ~' '''~:, i~ • K' ~ ~~~ r 2 j }`' z `. w y ~"~ r ~~~_ u u u ~~ I( ll (~ ~ ~~ r^~ G? 1~ DATE: SHEET: ,; •r STAN CLAl150N ASSOCIATESiNC Scheme 3 ib~~-yzoos landscave afcbkect ure. plannln~.resorl deslEn =, 4t2 NOrlh Mil{Streel Aspen, CVloratlo Bitia Vail Chamonix REVISIOBS: ~~ ~'~` C97of9~5•ZJ=3 f.g7df9~n.t5t8 Village Neighborhood QF ~" into®scaplannigg;com ._ wwwsca tannin .com H:\R1084\Plans\5~,~cts\REV.1084CP3.dwg, 7/9/2008 6:02:41 PM, Adobe PDF.pc3, 1:2, Drexel, Barrell & Co., meg \ ~ ~ " 1 u~ pp1 I ~\ ~,~~~~~ a Il R 3 ,Nl1 ....3.. '"~ ``~ ~ ~ f N I ~_M ~ ~ f 1 \\ \\,,, \ \\ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ -~,5 b~~ X~iyO~,b,H,~ f 1~ ~ ~_a~ -- I ~, ~..,1 n ~: ~ v V V~ ~j ~ ,~ _ r~ R ,: ~ N ~ ~' a.: ~ a !"~ v=z~inm ~c~«~ix ~_ __ nnnnuun y5y oo9 <z<<z<;,ynm Ar(+~~IZ?N ~~~~~Di e~~Z~K~, ~~ ~~ 9~ A_ m° m ~\ ~ ~ \\ ,~ 1~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ I \~ \~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ ?C h It .~~{ It It ~ k {.),~C~ .f~f ~ .lp~pl .l~l A pAp S al l I l g ~ 1 ~ S ~ ~ V ~1 h i ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T~~ ~ m ~ 1 V ~ ~ 2 v ~ o nn H ~ .1 ~ ~ . y ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ O O O 4 ~ O ~ i ~ ti ~+ ~yy ~` y K s i < m i I I I ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ 4 0 $ CONCEPT PLANS FOR: ~. ~ ~ ~ ~6 ° m ~ _1 ~ ~ R ~ y o l4 B ~ 8 m ~ ~oiz C7 ~ ~~'~°> NSr-rn~ 'm0 _ ~ o 0 om ~ ~ ~ ; A 4 < ~ CHAMONIX/WENDY S PARCE ~NsF m ~ a ~§~~ ~m~,a m O ~ ~ ~m Z z ~ m o CHAMONIX ROAD s~a~ N c ~ ~n °~~ ~ o ~ ~ Q ~ z om { -n 'o o =w m `d A ; n n n VAIL, COLORADO ow~ z N m ~9 o n~° ~ ~ N ~~~ ~ ~v~~ r~* ~ nz A 4~ M ~ANo • 0 0 n o D r m II ~ o 0 0 0 ~, a ~1 I '~, 1111 11 ~ ' \\ -L__~-_ I I I W' 1 i ~~ I ~_ k / I I v ~ ,~~ Y 9 ~ ~ 1 fi mpq 1 ~9 i$SR ± ~~ b~y Z I A~ 111 b, 1 k~ 1 ~ 1 ~~ f y \ i ~.. % I _. ~ i l~ ~,t @®JT ^~ i- c_ n C ~~- r- ,_. ~~~ F~ @~~° c ~~ o 3 -.._ ~ i s~ I \~ \ / ~_ `._~! m ~. ODD W O A~rO m ° N mpm Om~ ~scc zr mD°~ ' m~ ~ A - Z A ~~~m r Wiz- cn~°~ ~~N ~~ ~o z °o>No° ~- ~cmai r~ &b. N °~ cmnm°~z nj A ~ c~~"o ' °o ~~~~ z o<Z'^ zvym\iiM..// W ~<22iam D ~n« zx m oz W u n n li II u u m Svzzzlnx ~°~~zz D '-15 titiODZ ~ ~~ozm~~ ° <~~ N ~A .~ . ~~, ~ ~ a m I I ~ I u \\ \\ ~\ ' \~ I I ~m ~ o ~ F o ~ ~ k k SAO ~ ~ C ~ ~ a O m O O ~ 2 nN 10/1 N II ~ m nT. 2 m z ~ k A ~~ z Z a o n ~ ~ n ~ rn v~Ai ~ ~ x a ~ a <° x a ~ m ~ ~ p ~ n ~ m c~ m ro i 21n 2 i ` °z n A ~ g ;y ~ ~ ~ a ~ mz n z r y ~ m ~; ° G7 z ~ ~ m o Z 0 II o ; , I I o ~ - ~, I ? M W O ~ m ~ x q A xtn ~ ~ ~ U U I A m A A 1 1 J I 1 ~ I I ~m n H d = n A s n ~ g o m CONCEPT PLANS FOR: ~ N cn ° ~6 ° m„ ~'„ ~ gn > ~NMX zom~ 0 ~nA ~z~~ ~ n1o~wQD ~'' `.~~~~.t'n A c~ypnC)~ won ..o o c ~omzC~Z A~g~>°arrnr m o = mm ~ D ~ ; ~ m j < m CHAMONIX/WENDY'S PARCE ~N~~ ~ ~ o ~o~~ ~na a D N ~ ° =m ~ ~ r `~ CHAMONIX ROAD g~my N c m ~~"3 ~~c ~ ° m - a m r r,n 2 ~ o ~ =W ~ ~ a ° p n ~ ~ °D VAIL, COLORADO ~`~~ Z O ~ ~~Waz omo r' ~ N ~~°o ° wv~~ m i ~Z A:9 0~>~c'~ o Z ~ F, ;m ~ p C `G V N 0 0 00 \J ~~ 7 O rt n ~ Q ` ~• N C ,. .., _. _.~ - 171 w~- ~ ; rn q ~ C ; ~ ~, ~ r-- ~ µ f~ Ir~~~il~ ~ ~ ! D _ ° C, ~ i ~ ~ W7~ g ~ ~ f~T' ~, I ~ I \~ ~~ s - s~ ~z - _ ;~ .. r ~~ C 4 ~ ~ n ~ s~ n a. .. b ~~ i O W ~C aie ~ 4 ~~ 7 ~ _. k ,\ ~ ~l ~\! ~~ fS -~ A Trn T O W r T rn ~ = rn O ~' c -' ~~ Z ~ ~ Z S?° ,~~ ~~~ _`\ ~\ :=1" ~~i I 7 L I „ ' :`\ ~l`. I' 9'• hk~f'~ '~ ,f '' :' 4 -lj;, - 6 ~r ~~ i ~~ ', .. I' ij i I1' (' I ~:. ~ ,`„ ` IiIi ~1 R~O t ,t R-~. { ~ ~~ f r~ f! . ~J !' `~ ~., j~ C ~ O ~_ V N O OD ~~ ~~.__. 0 ~ N ~--:. ~ F r-- - o0 ,.a 1 ; " N S . _ ~~ `~ ~_- ~ ~ ~~T ~~ t/~ n _. O 0 rt N 0 t/~ n _~ O a,, „~, >>•, '.t.~ ..~ '~` ~~ ~~ a~ ~~ ;n r~ _~ crs ~o ~~ n v ~ r y _'. ~ w' D -~ o Cn 2 an n ~' w n. m "' "' T T rn u W O ~ r r T rn ~ = rn O ~" c~ ~„ D Z D ~Z e o 0 ~~ ~. z ~7 _~ M1 :_ 5 a 6 O d gY O 3 i 3 i.r+ r i b o_ MIP ', r~ ~ V , ~y iJuu y +® C ~i r -~ ~ ~ w~ r o N O '9 O _ OD _ ~.~ ~M1 ~--[`~~ ~ DATE: SHEET: ;z ~-,STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESiNC Scheme 1 16Ju1y2008 'landscape archirectare,planning.resor~ design RevlSfOnS' '~quNortbMlNSireet Aspen.Culuradug,Btt Vail Chamonix Alley and Street ~ 1 49TO/gts'2323 f. 9)o/yao-r6a8 0~ i `~ inlo~sca lanning;com wwwsca tannin .com y„'. My .`er :~ J r ` ' v--~--- b, ~ \ ~`~ ~ ~ \~~~~~~~R j1. ~ a~ ` .yj!~ 4 ~ ~~ _. , ~. 9 ~ \ '~ ~ r, H:\R1084\Plans\5~,...:ts\REV.1064CPl.dwg, 7/9/2008 5:55:42 PM, Adobe PDF.pc3, 1:2, Drexel, Barrell & Co., meg 1'~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ r~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~$~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "' ~-p~~tt` ~' ~z \ ~ w~~ ~ w I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 8':=, ~ ~ ~ ~ o a \ ~` i ~ . 4`~ ~ ~F A'. ~ i ~ ~ ~, Qp oc ~ N ~~ ~ ~~ ke ~~ ~ Fo ~ f x«~~i y a rlc w~ -' i mm _~ ~ 6 y 3 ! P y 1 „~ g ~ a Y~ ~~x~ ~ ~ R~ u _ _- J p 3 ~~ - 5 1 5 __ ~ .. - I ~. o ,. .. .... -- I ~. ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~~ I ~, I _ _ _ ,1 i ~a~ I I ~3._ _ I i I ~I ~ I I f ~ i i "' \ i ~ 0 I ~ , it ~N ~ I I I - ~~ 1 U J~ I I 4` ° ~~ i 7 ~ m 1 _.._. r ., ~, _,~ _ ~ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ I ~ ~ v ~ i `~ . .,: \ ~._ ss `, a r .-, ,~ I __ ,_ - ,, ; ~~~ ~ I a - -- ~~ ~ \ 9 s ~ o "~ ~~ _ ~ `-"-- -L ,~ ' '~ ~ _ _ I o ~ ~ :y~ N J~~ - 1 I s I ~'~ & Lr;~ °U ~ E I ° I ~ m I ~ ~ m ~ m - . - {- I N ~ I _ f- - - ___ I _ it A .....i ~ / ; / ~C ,. ~ .. __. `~ / t ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ - u~ r 4 N i '~ I ( ~ C ~ __ ~ ,, ~~ ~ ~ c ~~ r~ ~ ~P;~: ~ > >s I ~ £ ~; ~ ~ i ~ 1' ffi I St 3 ~.~, ~~ _~ - s- I `~~ _ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s,, ` n ~` ~ s~ f I ~ ~~ ~ ~ N _ - _ _- ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ N ~ I s ~- ~ ~ = I I a ~~~ .~~G~ £ ~ I __.~ y a \ w N ~ _._. I ,, / t ~ C 9 \ ~ ~ Obp~ ~,/ND~ ss M £ ~ ° ~ I r v " ~~ ~ bH,~ ~~ ~ s _ s ~ I I s o ~~ J I I 1 ~f~~!I I __ ==J ,~ i _ _ - __, _ _ ..~. 1 o ~^ a S 8 $$t c$~t f$~ ~c$pz c$~t ~s$px f$~ s4$u s4$p ~' ~ $ "' 1.) O D ~ ~ «= Z x ~ ~ ;C ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti t~ t~i t3 b tl b tl ti ~ ~ ~ IrI D C C 1 1 1 1 II 1 II > _ ,~. m „~ K m mZ~N ' ~C ~9 Z2DN~ ~ ~ D ~ _ ~ § _ '^ Z_N mac- ~Np~ <_ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ypOZ1Vyn ~8 i ~ ; : : ~rnD ' OOH mr°n ; ; ; ~~~ ~ W~ a E a y: N ~ ©,~, I I I O ~~~~ 2~ O ~ ~ I o ~ O o I~~ _ ~ A Fa ~ ~^ 4 ° ~ _ CONCEPT PLANS FOR: o ~jj o ~~ ° m ~ f~ ~ C'7 ~ N ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~~~NOZ m ~ ~s~.rm, m o 0 om ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ m "' ` CHAMONIX/WENDY'S PARCE ~m~= ~ ~ a ~§°~ y~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~uoFr+l m ~ zoo' to ~ Nm Z Z Z ~ ~ CHAMONIX ROAD um'~NC ~ ~~n na~~ o ~ o ~ m~ C7 > u . m ~ ~ ~ °s VAIL, COLORADO },'c~~`N"m~ ~ o ~aW> o~~ r" m ~ -- 4 ~ O 0 ~~~ U O N O N C7 O D r r*1 II [n cn o O 0 0 m~ a~~ 11 i z w~ 1i k ~ _, 1 \ 1 I 1 1 ..~ ~\ r~~ ~. ., .. ., .. .~ , ~~~~ a P~ `. `~L ~ ~ \ m ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ o ~~ -I \ ~ \ ~ \ \I\ \ \\ .~ 1 1 1 m ~ \ b ,~ ~` ~ ~ \ ~ ~'``~ ~~ ;~ `~,~ U\' 111 I N u_V , S - C C ~ o \~ 11 _ I r" m ~11:, ~ 1 1 ~r--i ~ F I 1 '~ O Y O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A A A ~/~~~) O ~ f D 2 k k k DO O O O~ D rI~ < ~ ~ D O O O O ~ 2 n N VOi t0/1 ~~~ ~~ r x ? A y Y k ; ~O ~ O f~*1<N O (7 ~<~~inx D m m ° x _ ,~^~ n0 p m~ o z D v~ ~ m A ~ pZ~ a mo omOmr °~ m ti z c - ~ C ^~i D~ X; ~ A m mncvciZ+c n n n u u n n m o °z m g ~ n z< Z o D ~ c m SOD°^~, nZ o~oz~ic~~ n n ~ ~ ~? o m ~10D, VOO ~ Z ~ c! c G7 ~cmc{nA,o~ K=im cn i o ~ frl wm~z 1 VV aD ~o I O ~ ° Omo ' Op OnD ~~ Z D o D rn*i M~M °z ~ I I ' m W ~ i H p 1 %A Ol A U ~ i m I I A 1 ~1 _ fTl i z o ~ m n 0 r m(n Z o ~ ~ z m x A ~ ° cl z ~ CONCEPT PLANS FOR: ~ N~ m ~~ °_ (n ~ O ~ €6 z mNm~ o > ~ e k ` ~ fT1 ~ O n 1 ~C7 n G7 = ~A ~ D m .. o o N c `^ ' yeti O Z ozz O r*t ~7 R o.. ~ oS~'r ~ m N N ~ Z zm ~ D ° D D~ m m j m CHAMONIX/WENDY S PARCE ~~~~ ~ ~ o ~o~~ ~~ a D O ~ ~ ~ Z T ` ~ i c F fTl ~ ~ ~ 3 ~'" in ~ S~N m ~f l - > g CHAMONIX ROAD ~Nmti ~ c ~ a o? ~ o O ~ ~ A m f~ G7 ~ z z n n o v n ~ n ~ n ~ ° m VAIL, COLORADO NwO1m -~ -~ O O ~ ~ ~`~ > n.~ _~ ~ a° y ~ m ~ N ~ ~ - _ z ~ ~~ y o o r•~ ~_ /~ V N O O OD a ® [M~ ~ Ste? a ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ' + N 2 'J D i"° ~.. O D n -~- _. rt 00 w n ~ °v ~~ 0 0 ..~ ~, ~ ~ ~ u~ s ~ d z v ~j ~ r ~. ~ M- ~a w s~ :Cn ~~ ~ D ~ 9 ~ "' -n m r ~ w w O c~ ,° ~ o~ ~ D ~~ W ~ r T rn ~ = rn ~ cn c~ ~„ D Z~ ~Z H n _~ 0 ~ ~ 0 .y. N , n Qn G O • N O D D F ~ ~ D -I O rC~inJ ~ r ~? Q ~ ~ W11 y D ~ N o S ~ ~~~ S STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESiNc landscape archll¢cl urp. DlanninL•re so rt d¢si~n qu Norlb MITI Street Aspen, Colorado St6u ~97o/yzg•z3z3 L97o/yzo-t6z8 Vail Chamonix vn 1 e: oncc 1 Scheme 2 ,b~Uiyzoo$ Revisions: Neighborhood Cluster of C O O N _ ,,' I ~~. n ~`~ ~ `~ ( ~~__~ ¢~ ,]~~ ~ k 2 k k ~ ~ ' k h ,]~~ k ,]~~ ,]~~ 2 , , ~ a 2 " ' ' ' ` k A ~ ~ ~n p A A A A A A A ~ D A ~ v v v v a v v 2 m v ~ a N w u~i u~i u~i u~i ~ i A ~ ~ ~ a ~ v ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ Z ~ L ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ S ; o In ~ o v o 0 0 0 0 o I 7 ~ m s ' R ~ ~ ~ I B ? ~ ~ s = Z g < ~ C K to ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ m A ~ ~ ' IA ~ Z D _ Z O a Z ~ D Z p ~ __ (~J<Z ZSDAX AO« Z 02 ' ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ y II tl II II II N p N ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~°r~r~z io vl <AAS y~~ ~~ODOZ o~ ~joo J J O 0 ~ F 8 C~ ~~ ~i ~ • ~ ~ O ~ I I ~ I I ~~ rOH A j °~ O O O I I '^°m = ITt b~° ~ ~ ~ cm-i ~ m (n r o ~ r^ = 4 3F o > ~ tl°~ ~ vi - CONCEPT PLANS FOR: `~ ,; ~ N ~ °zy~ ° N D o ~ ~6 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ Nw~t ~' ~ v f~T ~ n ~ OCR ~ 2= ~ N n i ~ 8 m 8 ~ m ' ~ K~~N O Z tiomz (7 m ~ 055'r -, ~ - A$? ~~y 9 m ~ ~ ~ Z o Z o om ov3~O Z a~ ra A m ~ ~ m CHAMONIX/WENDY S PARCE ~~ ~ _~ D ~ gNOFm~ o m ~, ~ v ~oA >~ ~ ~~°~~m~a ~ p D m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ Z m N t.~ Z ' N " W ~ ; ~ ~ v a ' CHAMONIX ROAD VAIL, COLORADO s4mA cn ~ ow Z N +~ Z ~ m ~nw~ ° 7 i~ ~ ~ o " ~ v .. v N A ~ T 1 V ~ O N I ~ m m ~ Z n ~ y V ~ ~Fi " C7 i -A s ~ ~ ,~ \\ ,~__ e ~J 0 0 N O N C7 0 D r m II ~ o 0 0 0 9 m~a '91' ' z' ~I ;.~ ~1 °~ v, ~-- 'f ~ \` ~ f, ~ O n I~"u ` C V V F-'' ~ LI LI • I~ O O ~ ~~_ rrnn~~ `luu G ~C _J J W M ODD W T) A r O m ~ N D m~lm O m~ C IT1 D In ~ C m~cc~m A~ ~ z cn O -~ N SO ~~ '~ O Z °oDNoo ~ ~c~"c nNo~ m D ( mAZ y .'Omy t ~~ nD~ Z O c~Z[l ^ Z \YV/ o~m M m ,. .. .~. ~~~~ a ~. ~. ., I ~. ~. i w \\ ~,~ rn O O ~ F > = k k k DO O O ~ > ~ n o m o O ~ ^~ nN N m (~1<~~SD% D II r xZi .-fl y ti ]C ; ~° O ° ~oc~ z W '1 ymy ~ ~ z ~ O O m~ m z ~ W A T O ~ ~ y ~ ~~ tl II II II II II II m ~ ~ ~ p O n~ yrn x ~ SozzDnx ~ o z m H Ca 2 °z< ~ n O N D ~ ~~A~o AZ ~ m s ~ mz ~ n ~~cz,„KC> O r ~ ~ °z r ~~ z '" o m ji N a ~ c: c ~ ~A ~ ~. A m ~a ~' z rn ~ o I ~ 1 o ~~ ~ ~ I ' I I ~^ A ~ O ~ m ~ x q ~ ~ ~ r U U ~ %? Otl A I 1 V A 1 1 ~ I I _ ~ A 0 = ~ s Z m A ,°~~ CONCEPT PLANS FOR: g vDi to ~ '6 ° m m~ ~ n ~ O C7 ~ G7 A ~ '~H ~ ~ o m a ~ m ° ~ n e vni'ro O D ~omz O Z fZrl ~ x ' n ~ ~ `"~. M Rte.. 05~ r ,Z~] m N N o Z o om ~ D ooh ~ ~ fTl ~;= ~ n m ` o m ~ < '~ CHAMONIX/WENDY'S PARCE ~N~~ ~ ~ g o~ m i C o m ~ =obi b~~ a " 3 ~"'v, ~ D m ~ ~ A Z n ~ ~ ~ Z = D ' m ° CHAMONIX ROAD owmA m~~ ~' ~ 9aNV y~e wD ~ O ~ o o cN ~ " N ~ ~ ~ D VAIL, COLORADO ~ =~ p ~ ° ~~ z oho ~ ~ N A ~ ~ Z o_ ~ ~ m m m i n Z mA ~ =9 0 ~< k ~ " A o m ~ O 0 May 7 Advisory Committee Site Plan Options O 0 Chamonix Site Master Plan Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda May 7, 2008 Meeting start time: 12:00 noon (Lunch) I. Overview of Previous Committee Meeting (20 minutes) II. Presentation of Revised Site Plan Options and Discussion (1 hr 30 minutes) III. Wrap Up and Next Steps (10 minutes) VIII. Adjournment (2:00 pm) C ..., (05/20/2008) Scot Hunn - Re: Chamonix Site Advisory Committee Update Page 1 From: jack bergey <jackbergey@yahoo.com> To: Scot Hunn <SHunn@vailgov.com> Date: 05/20/2008 2:20 PM Subject: Re: Chamonix Site Advisory Committee Update Scot It looks like I won't be making it tonight. I am sure you received Bob's comments. I agree with him except that those of us along Chamonix In don't have a problem with option 3 as long as you keep the larger buildings to the west and south area of the parcel. Again, sight and sound mitigation of I-70 and commercial area is important as the views of the mountains are to the east and over the tops of a 4 story building. I think an aesthetically pleasing modular build could be built. It needs to AFFORDABLE. Thanks again for all of your hard work Jack Bergey --- Scot Hunn <SHunn@vailgov.com> wrote: > Jack, > It will be a public meeting; you will have an > opportunity to speak on behalf of the neighborhood. > See you tomorrow night. > Scot > Scot Hunn, AICP > Senior Planner > Town of Vail > (970) 477-3551 Office > (970) 479-2452 > shunn@vailgov.com > »> jack bergey <jackbergey@yahoo.com> 05/19/2008 > 4:21 PM »> > Scott > Great job! Will ther be any oportunity for public > comment at the council meeting for me to speak in > the > behalf of my neighbors on Chamonix Ln? > Jack Bergey > --- Scot Hunn <SHunn@vailgov.com> wrote: West Vail Site Planning Concepts Narrative The development of site planning concepts for the Chamonix site is premised on the stated goals and objectives of the Vail Community. A variety of opportunities and constraints that result from the physical characteristics of the site have been identified by the design team, and these parameters inform the planning process as well. The charge to "optimize the site" requires that a spectrum of planning concepts be explored and evaluated by all stakeholders. In the end, the best plan will be the one that balances the concepts of density, neighborhood impact, traffic & parking, aesthetics, sustainability and value. A menu of site planning concepts has been created for consideration by the community. These ideas are illustrated in three diagrams identified as Option 1 -Neighborhood Cluster, Option 2 - Street/Alley & Option 3 - Village/Neighborhood Cluster, and they range from lowest density to highest density. At this stage, density numbers are not fixed. They are sim magnitude that can be adjusted based on stakeholder feedback. ~ Additional information about the current site plan diagrams follows: '~' ~ ~j 2~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ Option 1-Neighborhood Cluster • Estimated 44 Residential Units • Project Site Density: 12 du/acre • Buildable Site Density: 18 du/acre • Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 27,000 sf ~Z~ ~e • Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 45,000 sf Zt °lo • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 72,000 sf ~ ~ DAL 0 /~ • ui mgs are organize s ers. ~~`, • Open space/view corridors separate the clusters. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights are generally 3-stories and do not exceed 4-stories. • A preferred fire station & dormitory configuration remains to be selected by the Fire Department. This scheme illustrates a footprint with 1 drive-thru bay and 2 back-up bays along the property line adjacent to the gas station. Option 2- Street & Alley • Estimated 51 Residential Units • Project Site Density: 14 du/acre • Buildable Site Density: 21 du/acre ,` ~ Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 36,000 sf t~% r~'~ Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 39,000 sf 1 S°~ • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 75,000 sf ~fo • Traditional street/alley configuration with linear alignment of buildings to create streetscape. • Reduced open space/view corridors results from increased building footprint. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights are generally 3-stories along Chamonix Lane and 4-stories in the remainder of the site. • A preferred fire station & dormitory configuration remains to be selected by the Fire Department. This scheme illustrates a footprint with 1 drive-thru bay and 2 back-up bays against the hill at the west property line. Option 3- Village/Neighborhood Cluster • Estimated 78 Residential Units • Project Site Density: 21 du/acre • Buildable Site Density: 32 du/acre • Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 34,000 sf 1 b`1e • Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 22,000 sf bo~~° (~~ • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 56,000 sf 2!0°l • A parking structure creates a vegetated (green) base for high density housing configurations. • Improved open space/view corridors due to reduced site coverage of buildings & paving. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights at the east end of the site do not exceed 3-stories to minimize impact on adjacent neighbors. • The higher density configuration is located at the west end of the site to take advantage of steeper slopes and to minimize impact on adjacent neighbors. Building heights may range from 3 to 5 stories. • A preferred fire station & dormitory configuration remains to be selected by the Fire Department. This scheme illustrates a footprint with 3 back-up bays against the hill at the west property line. West Vail Site Planning Concepts Narrative The development of site planning concepts for the Chamonix site is premised on the stated goals and objectives of the Vail Community. A variety of opportunities and constraints that result from the physical characteristics of the site have been identified by the design team, and these parameters inform the planning process as well. The charge to "optimize the site" requires that a spectrum of planning concepts be explored and evaluated by all stakeholders. In the end, the best plan will be the one that balances the concepts of density, neighborhood impact, traffic & parking, aesthetics, sustainability and value. A menu of site planning concepts has been created for consideration by the community. These ideas are illustrated in three diagrams identified as Option 1 -Neighborhood Cluster, Option 2 - Street/Alley & Option 3 - Village/Neighborhood Cluster, and they range from lowest density to highest density. At this stage, density numbers are not fixed. They are simply suggestions of magnitude that can be adjusted based on stakeholder feedback. Additional information about the current site plan diagrams follows: Option 1-Neighborhood Cluster • Estimated 44 Residential Units • Project Site Density: 12 du/acre • Buildable Site Density: 18 dulacre • Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 27,000 sf • Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 45,000 sf • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 72,000 sf • Buildings are organized in neighborhood clusters. • Open space/view corridors separate the clusters. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights are generally 3-stories and do not exceed 4-stories. • A preferred fire station & dormitory configuration remains to be selected by the Fire Department. This scheme illustrates a footprint with 1 drive-thru bay and 2 back-up bays along the property line adjacent to the gas station. Option 2- Street & Alley • Estimated 51 Residential Units • Project Site Density: 14 du/acre • Buildable Site Density: 21 du/acre • Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 36,000 sf • Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 39,000 sf • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 75,000 sf • Traditional street/alley configuration with linear alignment of buildings to create streetscape. • Reduced open space/view corridors results from increased building footprint. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights are generally 3-stories along Chamonix Lane and 4-stories in the remainder of the site. • A preferred fire station & dormitory configuration remains to be selected by the Fire Department. This scheme illustrates a footprint with 1 drive-thru bay and 2 back-up bays against the hill at the west property line. Option 3- Village/Neighborhood Cluster • Estimated 78 Residential Units • Project Site Density: 21 du/acre • Buildable Site Density: 32 du/acre • Estimated Building Site Coverage (Footprint): 34,000 sf • Estimated Impervious (Paved) Surface Area: 22,000 sf • Estimated Site Coverage (Buildings & Paving): 56,000 sf • A parking structure creates a vegetated (green) base for high density housing configurations. • Improved open space/view corridors due to reduced site coverage of buildings & paving. • Open space at the east end of the site to preserve sightlines at Chamonix Road/Lane intersection. • Building heights at the east end of the site do not exceed 3-stories to minimize impact on adjacent neighbors. • The higher density configuration is located at the west end of the site to take advantage of steeper slopes and to minimize impact on adjacent neighbors. Building heights may range from 3 to 5 stories. • A preferred fire station & dormitory configuration remains to be selected by the Fire Department. This scheme illustrates a footprint with 3 back-up bays against the hill at the west property line. r 1 .. 0 ,1 '~-_. __ `~ y ,~ w~ -~ ~" ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ a ~~ q~i, ~ ~ r, ,~ ~v~ \ ~.....~-_-.1 p~ ~~ ~ l~ ~ ~~ ~~ z \ l~ r ~ ~ ~`,: ~~ LJJ ~ '~, ~ LL J \ ~ J m Q a ~ ~ I--- ~ ~ ~ m W ~ ~ a ~ ~~ .« ~ _ o ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ a ;, ,\ ` \ ,~ \\ c~ z Y N ~ W a a w ~ zw ~a Y > U ~ ~a ~~ „-. . , WEST 1JAiL FIRE STA~'IUN AFFORDABLE IiC3UiNG DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ,,~ ~ ,¢ ~, ~ ~ a~ z C t4 I 4 ~ Z ~- COMMENTS RESIDENTIAL 51 68,800 1 -Bedroom 7 1,000 7,000 2 -Bedroom 22 1,200 26,400 3 -Bedroom 14 1,500 21,000 4 -Bedroom 8 1,800 14,400 GARAGE SPACES 16,750 Garage Spaces 67 250 16,750 FIRE STATION 11,924 Fire Station 1 11,924 11,924 FIRE DEPARTMENT DORMITORY 4,130 Dormitory (18 residents) 1 4,130 4,130 AMBULANCE SERVICE 0 Ambulance Service 0 4,746 0 Irv. TOTAL.NET~AREA~'~~ -~ ~> 'tom '~ a~o;~,~ ~~d~. .{f~.a 'IQ~'6t34 ~ ~~~ ~~~,,,n,-~ ~.~: °!!~.,m~~:~miii' Non-Program Space 25,401 (circulation, support & common) I~ANQ TOTAL GROSS AREA G 7 Z7,OO5 Total Residential Units 51 13.77 Site Density (3.6 acres) 20.91 Buildable Area Densit (2.43 acres) Studio B Architects May 7, 2008 w ~ A i~ I~~ . . WEST AIL FIDE ST;4TION & ~FFt)RDABLE ROUSING DIMENSIONAL 3, REQUIREMENTS COMMENTS i -~o T ~ Q ' ~ ~, ~ ~ z ~; ~ i C~'. a~ z ~ '~ RESIDENTIAL 78 106,000 1 -Bedroom 10 1,000 10,000 2 -Bedroom 30 1,200 36,000 3 -Bedroom 28 1,500 42,000 4 -Bedroom 10 1,800 18,000 250 1 11 1301 4 NICe 35, C Total Residential Units 78 21.06 Site Density (3.6 acres) 31.98 Buildable Area Densit (2.43 acres) Studio B Architects May 7, 2008 r _ '. _, ~~ ~~, 'I - ~~ ~~,- 4i 1i ; ~o' ~ `{n v/ ~ ~, ~ ~, ~~~ ~ , "~ 5 ~~ ~ Z ` ~ a~ a V ", ~ ~ ~. w ~ ~~ ~,. _ ~, ~ w ;.~ ~ ~~ J J Q ': ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~Q mV _ ~ d < -~ ~ _ o `~ -~ "` -` ~, ~~~ ~. ~, ~\ ~\ 0 w K U O ~ Q M WW W ~ T ~ i ~ ~ (/, U` ~ Z J W J ~ Z V~ c~ z Y N ~ W (.~ a¢ w o ~ ~ Z ~ Z Y ~ U ~ J H- ~ i ,~ 1 WEST IAAIL-FIRE iTATION $<< DIMENSIONAL I COMMENTS REQUIREMENTS ~ ~` ~ m .- ~ ~ ~~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~I C~ ~ ~°- RESIDENTIAL 44 I . 60.200 1 -Bedroom 2 1,000 2,000 2 -Bedroom 22 1,200 26,400 3 -Bedroom 14 1,500 21,000 4 -Bedroom 6 1,800 10,800 IGaraae Spaces 1 581 2501 14,5001 n 1 4,130 4 0 4,746 (circulation, chases, walls & structure) ~~ ' 9 -:_ k.. `~~ %?^ ;.yma-z ...q hf fin."- t <~t 1 ~ i«., a _, -a '~E :. ma Si H t9. r /~ k y „ ~_..»~liiti ~a~L vf~ ( ~,.: w~a;?., "itl i ~r ~~ ~ ~`.. ->2... a ~, rt,~~ a ~ ~ s a s'a..~'X~"X-. ~ ~. -4~, Total Residential Units 44 11.88 Site Density (3.6 acres) acres Studio B Architects May 7, 2008 April 11 Advisory Committee Site Plan Options Chamonix Site Master Plan Advisory Committee Meeting April 11, 2008 AGENDA 12:00 noon -Lunch/Start Review of Project Goals and Design Parameters (5 min) II. Presentation and Review of Preliminary Site Plan Concepts (1 hr 30 min) A. Site analysis B. Density C. Pedestrian & vehicular circulation D. Preliminary unit mixes E. Other design elements III. Discussion, Survey Results and Questions (25 min) A. Additional Discussion B. Housing Survey Results C. Next Steps D. Questions? IV. Adjournment (2:00 p.m.) Chamonix Site Master Plan Advisory Committee April 11, 2008, Meeting Notes The Advisory Committee held a public meeting on April 11, 2008, in the Community Development Large Conference Room to discuss the first site plan concepts ("options") for the Chamonix Site. The meeting convened at 12:00 noon and Staff presented a brief overview of the eleven project planning goals and design parameters approved by the Town Council on March 4, 2008. Stan Clauson and Gilbert Sanchez discussed how the goals and parameters factored into the three site plan and density options to be presented to the Committee. Three options were presented. Each option showed a mix of low density (duplex) residential on the northern portions of the site, combined with higher density (townhouse/condominium) structures generally located on the southern portion of the site. Each option showed a fire station and living quarters (separated) located on the "Wendy's" parcel. Option 1 was identified during the meeting as the lowest density option (18 DU/buildable acre); Option 2 was identified as a medium density option (22 DU/buildable acre), and; Option 3 was identified as the highest density option (32 DU/buildable acre). Options 2 showed an area of the fire station facility, dedicated or reserved for a future Ambulance District development. The committee discussed whether to design the project around the eventuality of the District building on the site, or whether to proceed with designing the fire station and housing around the Town's immediate needs. Option 3 showed a sub-grade parking structure under multi-family (condominium) development - as a "new urbanist" model to encourage pedestrian circulation through the site and to present more common open space/courtyard space. The committee discussed the disadvantages of constructing asub-grade parking structure and committee members agreed that Option 3 might be "too dense" and potentially cost prohibitive to construct. Each option showed additional (new) road/driveway cuts along Chamonix Lane to serve several duplex structures located on the northern portion of the site. One committee member reiterated concern by the residents of the Chamonix neighborhood regarding additional driveway entrances. He stated concern, but expressed a willingness on behalf of the neighborhood to consider a limited (4-5) number of new driveways. The committee members discussed the three options, pointing out advantages and disadvantages of differing densities. General comments or suggestions are as follows: In any fire station design scenario, the design must account for backing of equipment and the associated noise; Use positioning of the fire station building and associated fire department/Town employee housing to "wrap" or enclose equipment bays and to provide a better visual and noise barrier between the fire station, the adjacent Shell Station and the adjacent neighborhood; • Consider an access control gate to separate residential from emergency services uses and traffic circulation; • Reduce or eliminate new driveway access points on Chamonix Lane; • Must consider CDOT access standards and the potential need to request a variance from CDOT for access points less than 150' form the round- about; • Align. internal circulation access point on Chamonix Road, to be across from the existing driveway at First Bank; • Ensure that proper turning radii is provided within the fire station portion of the site for emergency services vehicles; • Explore locating fire department housing within a third story of the fire station, rather than in a separate building, to preserve more buildable space on the site for residential uses and open space/common areas; • Option 3 ("Parking Garage Option") may be too dense/urban and cost prohibitive; • Option 3, or a combination of Options 2 and 3, may be desirable if redesigned to accommodate better separation between lower density duplex structures and higher density town-home and condominium buildings; • Study revising plans to better integrate higher density, for-sale residential units with fire department/Town employee housing and to provide a better visual and noise barrier between the fire station, the adjacent Shell Station and the adjacent neighborhood; • Concepts should include more "New Urbanist" design concepts to minimize auto-oriented design solutions (such as solutions presented in Option 3). The committee discussed next steps in the process - to allow the design team to further study each option -and discussed possible next meeting dates. The meeting adjourned at 2:00 pm. w Ck~DtMU1.~11C Si-T~ ~~ 15~0~1~,~ COV~~vYll~rz~. y~u boo . ~~ ~• ~~~i~ -rot~c~ Aar '~- I~l ~ivul£~ ~~ ~- 2 Ago«~~~ ~oo~r- ~ :' ~ ~.,, / i8 O~• ~es~0~~-ts C~~-~~Crdt~ / ~l~h~ ~1S11fL~C~ -- W~ S ~~c~ is ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ W~~ ~~ ~,~ ~`~ ~~ G~P~' `'M '1'F41 -' ~ oV l~ 4x~vvt, ~'R~ ~. -~- ~f t ~11~~ci1t~ ~Z - Z ~vll~'r~,rtv1.~ i - ~ ca~-~ ,rk~---- .,per 2 : oo P,~ .~~u~ ~~~L ~c-n ca.s~n~, ~,YL I-F1,tstS~ IAA l,~ uS~. l a c ~ ~,~ ~~ r R~iO~~ ~~CA,p1,~S ~ ~ ~~ YLNC~GS ~- ~- ~T~~ (,Yuat(~ - t-aGc ~--- ~ac~l~ I~lcfl -tv cr~aC c~2 'tr~~Ct~-~ ~ ~,o.~.C.. -: ,per. ?, t ~~ 4, ,c l.~ . ~~ wou~ ~~ t.o~oc-S~ - ttyscv~ S ~, -r~rti. , - cam- .~~~ •os ~ l~ vr~ .p~~ s '~M.N -~- CS~t~4~O~Afi~J~`` ~ ~J ~FT~I~I:~ ~T~C~ ~1~A~Ctt-~~xCl,. ~~~~~, ~s vrs flcc,~, ors C~~ gyp. ~.lor c-~z~or~ ~1ocJ,,- ~~ 7 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~L ~ ~~s~ ~? S ~I.M~v fi~-l~ivHP~JP~i -~ e~AnA~t~~ ~ ~ ~fi~ VN[~A~ +AoC3L.. ~c L_. ~~~ 4 ~~ - ~ too - two 1~- f ~r~.- L•~~ l,- ~. ~tt~,~- ~~D -rv ~~nn.~,2_.../_Y~U~~- ~~It~c~-~c+~'~ ~Q~c~P,f?~oc.r~s~s ~i~A~ ~ ga~~ss ~ ~4~ °~ ~ ~ ~~~~ o~ ~p~~ 3 . ~+ c,~ ~~~ -ra ~- ~-- ~ ut~~s-c-- i C.~urrr~- - .A~w~ -rb Do ~~ .~~ 2 ~' 4', L - 3 0~ ~, /v~+~At~ C~A~~LCL~-.~ c~ lfi1-(~,~_ 4~v~:t~( ~in~t-~~,,'l ~~t.~ Z - ~h~ 1 N ~ ~ ~~t,CtarvllcS . . Mme-- `~ ~ ~ ~ l it ,, ~~ ~~ ~~ ~I ~; ~~`~ '~~; oi-4. ~~ c~sT~,.cn~ -- c~civ~-- -~.. ~ p,~-' 0 I~E~ ~~~ I` d YI ~ m A b ~ b C^, b N r_ ~ •+ ?= S c ~, ~~ ~~ .. A A. - ~. o ~' ~" _~ c5 ~ D ~~ a n .. -ri rn N rn H co O Cn cn -i 0 °" ~ D y- vo r r T rn ~ = rn ON C ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ Z S?° 0 0 z t WEST VAIL FIRE STATION & DIMENSIONAL AFFORDABLE HOU5ING COMMENTS REQUIREMENTS m N Q ,~-' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ z - C N. Q ~, ~4 ~ ~ z ~ ~-- RESIDENTIAL FOR SALE 40 ~ 55 800 , 1 -Bedroom 0 1,000 0 2 -Bedroom 21 1,200 25,200 3 -Bedroom 12 1,500 18,000 4 -Bedroom 7 1,800 12,600 1 1 -Bedroom 2 -Bedroom 11, 924 994 (Ambulance Service I 1 I 4.7461 4.7461 & comm 1 Total Residential Units ~ 54~ ~ 14.58~Site Density (3.6 acres) 22.14 Buildable Area Density (2.43 acres) Studio B Architects April 11, 2008 . ~, $- ~ ~~ 6 r ~J c ~ ~ ~ ~~- `1 o 0 ~s a _+i W Q n V 1 a C'} '° r-" n ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ O ~~ m A ~- • C!~ n o C/~ o `~ ~ ~ ~~ T rn rn H °° O ~ o~ ~ ~ a~ o y y ,~ ~ r ' ~ -n rn~ = rn O ~" c -' ~~ zp ~z C WEST VAIL FIRE STATION 8~ DIMENSIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMENTS REQUIREMENTS 1 ~ r. -~ ~ z , Q ~ c~ n, z o ~ I RESIDENTIAL F OR SALE 70 400 98 1 -Bedroom 0 1,000 , 0 2 -Bedroom 34 1,200 40,800 3 -Bedroom 24 1,500 36,000 4 -Bedroom 12 1,800 21,600 GARAGE SPACE S 26,000 Garage Spaces 1041 250 26.000 1 -Bedroom 9 1,000 9,000 2 -Bedroom 0 1,200 0 FIRE STATION 11 924 Fire Station 1 11,924 11,924 FIRE DEPARTMENT DORMITORY 4,994 Dormitory (18 residents) 1 I 4.994 4.994 (circulation & co 37 GRAND TOTAL GROSS AREA ~ H7,H98 Total Residential Units 79 21.33 Site Densit (3.6 acres 32.39 Buildable Area Densi (2.43 acres) Studio B Architects April 11, 2008 C _ a r a~, * ~ ::~. ---- ~1 ~- .. i~ ~.. ~ `1 .. I ~ ~ ` ~ . ~. ~ ~~. I ~ d~ ,~ :~ gi .. ' h`'\ .\ `` `~: ' a~ W N !~ q N ~ N ~~ i ~~ 3 -. ~/a n C7 -. t ~ .. t m r \ rq +, \.~ f$tP ,~ ..~ \ a ~ A N fT1 a ~ ` ` ti `~~ ti :, ~ \ o CA ~~ 1,.y; ~ :~ ,, ~ ~ ~ ~ . k ~ ~ "' ~. a c7 1 ~ \, aC~:..: \.. ~ \ 0. art ri ~;; , t ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ '` . ~ M~ T rn T ~ WD r ?~ rn ~ = rn N C ~ v~ D t 4 ~ __ l~ ` \ 1 \ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f ., Y L ~ \~ .' M ~ v . __ .__ ~ j l •. a i ~ s\ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ t \ ~ ._...,. ~ _ ~ t,,,. ~~..+~'"-' L 1 ~~ ~ - d` _ L ~"~ { i . : ' ' 1 ~ .-.,ter . . 4 ., ~ ~~~ ,.. , _,~ t ;~ i e~° \ ~ , X ~ x, ~ ` '~ a ~ t~f i ,` < ~+ 1 , ~ . . ~ .; ~~ ~' a ~ t ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~==~ i ~ I - . f,~- t~ ~ , ~ ; ~ ~ I r I ~~ f ~ '~ 4 ~ + ~ ~ ~ i~ ' iC~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ .,.. 0 D Z v ~ ,D =i ~, ~ C ~_ m ~ ~ Z Z O Z O Z N N 0 ~ m ~ ~ cn C ~ C O rn rn Z c i~ -i - ?, \ Z O V ~f,i ~ ~~ ~ ~ _~ ~' l +, ~~~. ~ ,~, A ; ~ I 1~ 'i ,~ „r ~ ~"" t ~~. ~ ~E ~' r ), ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~'~ t 1. ( Ii ~ f, ~ in ~ t P ~ ~~~' /J'rr ~''~r 5a~ 1 ~J,' 1 r, I!/ l ~ ~ ~, ;~ i 1! 4 ,.'1 r~ ~~ ; `I ~ ~~ t < « ~ ~ ~~ ~~i ,ii1( 'l' t w'`l i J 1 _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f!;t ~~s,, ;fir. ',. ~ _ 'F_~ ,. C ~. yam.. _, -1 C ._ a t t r- c o 0 -~ 0 z d~ as d d~ ~~ d r ,a ? G ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ c '. A V ~3 A ,~.arnr~ ~ VJ [) ~ (~~ .. ;, m '" o~ o~ A O~ "~ • w. ~ rn -n (/~ Q -~ iCJ ~ r r T rn ~ = rn ~ cn C ~ cn D Z ~ ~ Z S?° Y Page 1 of 2 ` a Scot Hunn -Advisory Committee Update From: Scot Hunn To: Andy Daly; bobalouvail@aol.com; Craig Davis; dviele@gmail.com; Ethan Moore; jack Bergey; Margaret Rogers; Mark Miller; mark.ristow@efirstbank.com; rollie@nedbo.com Date: 02/18/2008 11:18 AM Subject: Advisory Committee Update CC: George Ruther; Greg Hall; Stan Zemler; Suzanne Silverthorn; Tom Kassmel; Warren Campbell Hello! I am taking this opportunity to provide a brief update of our progress to date on the Chamonix Site Master Plan project. On Thursday, February 7th, Staff and the consultant team held three "focus group" meetings to discuss needs and opportunities to be considered in the design development for the site. We met with: Employee Housing Group (type, size and quality of units and on-site amenities) This group consisted of major employers in the valley, employees, residents of Vail Commons and/or other deed restricted housing in town. We interviewed employers and potential buyers about the number of bedrooms needed, price points and amenities to be considered in order to hit our target market. We gained further insight into who our target market should be and who our potential funding (equity) partners might be in developing, marketing and selling employee housing. Infrastructure Group (road, sewer, water, snow storage, vehicular access and pedestrian circulation improvements) This group consisted of Greg Hall, TOV Public Works Director, Tom Kassmel, TOV Engineer, and Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowners Association, who offered suggestions and ideas on how to tie the Chamonix Site project to future plans in the larger West Vail area. We discussed opportunities to improve drainage, snow storage, pedestrian safety/circulation and vehicular access. Emergency Services Group (fire station access, operations and space programming needs) This group consisted of mainly TOV Fire Department personnel, as well as a representative from the Ambulance District. We discussed space programming needs for the Fire Department, including the functional differences between "fire prevention" staff and "emergency responders" staff. Also, the Ambulance District weighed in on their interest in potentially sharing some space in the station. We received input from Fire Dept. personnel regarding potential co-uses and conflicts, and the need for separated housing (rental and for sale) for residents and students. Directors (Staff Group - (Town of Vail departmental needs and potential municipal co-uses) This group consisted of the Town of Vail Director staff who provided information regarding potential Town of Vail employee housing needs (rental and for-sale), and potential Town co-uses on the site. Neighborhood Meeting On Wednesday, February 13th, staff and the consultant team hosted a "neighborhood meeting" with residents of West Vail. At the suggestion of Bob Armour, this meeting was organized and advertised to the entire neighborhood, in lieu of holding a neighborhood "focus group" meeting during day time hours. The intent was to allow more people to participate (after work hours) and to be more transparent - a great suggestion as we did have a good turn-out and received positive feedback and some constructive ideas that reinforce the goals and parameters adopted by Council. file://C:\DOCUments and settings\Administrator\I_ocal Se... 02/19/2008 Page 2 of 2 In all, the focus group meetings/interviews when combined with feedback from the neighborhood gives us good direction moving forward. Our next steps include: 1. Presenting a brief update to Council tomorrow night (2/19) to inform them of the focus group meetings and neighborhood meeting; 2. Working with the consultant team to synthesize the input gathered. We will then be able to provide a full summary of all input gathered to the Advisory Committee, and then to Town Council. 3. Presenting a subsequent, more in depth update to Council in the coming weeks (possibly March 4th) to provide a,detailed summary of all input gathered from focus groups, town staff and the neighborhood and to recommend any changes or additions to the ten project goals adopted by the Council in January. We will provide these summaries and seek any additional discussion and feedback from the Committee and the Council prior to moving forward with any design development. Thanks to those of you who participated in or attended the focus group meetings and/or the neighborhood meeting and please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about our progress or our next steps. Thank you! Scot Scot Hunn, AICP Senior Planner Town of Vail (970) 477-3551 Office (970)479-2452 shunn@vailgov.com file://C:\~ocuments and settings\Administrator\~ocal se... 02/19/2008 ____- '~ STAN CI.AUSON ASSOCIATESiNc landscape architecture. planning, resort design .. "_ qtz North Mill street Aspen, Colorado 81611 t. 97o/yz5~z3z3 f.y7o/yzo~i6zR ',;, info(n.''sr.aplanning,com wwwscaplanning.com ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES Meeting Date: 16 January 2008 Meeting Topic: Parameters for Master Plan Effort at Chamonix and Wendy's Properties Attendees: The Advisory Committee convened for the first time today to discuss the Master Planning effort for the Chamonix/Wendy's properties. Stan Clawson Associates facilitated the meeting around a Power Point presentation that reviewed the overall master plan process; the 2005 Master Plan for the Chamonix site; and changed conditions since the 2005 plan was adopted. The Advisory Committee was charged with its first task of updating the 2005 parameters for this Master Planning effort. The Advisory Committee agreed on the following goals for the Chamonix/Wendy's properties: Wendy's Property • For development of a fire station • The size of the station should relate to a possible remodel or relocation of the existing, main facility. If the existing facility is significantly updated, a station at the Wendy's site may be smaller. However, remodel or relocation of the existing facility is not officially scheduled or planned. • Afire station is needed for West Vail, no matter how significant a remodel or rebuild or the existing facility is. A West Vail fire station will provide better response time and services specifically to this area of town. • Housing for fire department employees should be considered in the design of the fire station. • An ambulance substation could be an ancillary use on this site • Energy-efficient and sustainable design and construction techniques are important. Certification by a particular program to be investigated, although not mandatory due to associated costs. • Connection to the Chamonix Site to be studied, but not a mandatory design element. Chamonix Site • 100% of the site should be used for affordable housing. • The site should be optimized to provide the greatest amount of affordable housing. • This site is appropriate for For-Sale affordable housing (there are other opportunities/properties for rentals). • The unit mix should be varied between one, two, and three bedroom units. • Rezoning from Primary/Secondary Residential (PS) to the Housing Zone District is preferred over a Medium Density Residential Zone district to allow greatest flexibility for future design rather than being restricted to a certain density. • No mixed-use development is appropriate for the site, except for consideration of municipal offices if necessary. The Wendy's property may be a better location for these offices, although they can be considered for this site. • Additional traffic onto Chamonix Lane should be limited; possible improvements to Chamonix Lane may need to be considered to better serve vehicular and pedestrian traffic. • One-story of development at grade with Chamonix Lane is acceptable as it would not impact the views of any existing neighbors. • Building height to be studied as a means to optimize the site although it is necessary to consider views from existing residences along Chamonix Lane. • Building-orientation important to create usable outdoor spaces. • Energy-efficient and sustainable design and construction techniques important. Certification by a particular program to be investigated, although not mandatory. • Financing and phasing options to be studied. • Connection to the Wendy's site not necessary, to be studied. NEXT STEPS: 1. Town Council to approve Updated Master Plan project parameters 2. Formation of and meetings with Focus Groups (i.e. housing, emergency services, neighbors, etc.) 3. Initiate site planning activity for both sites 2 alvl' ~tI S~`AKc~~S~ Advisory Committee Kick-Off Meeting Wednesday, January 16, 2008 Discussion Questions: Are previous results/assumptions made part of the existing master plan correct/valid given current conditions such as the combination of sites and a strong desire by the community and Council to develop employee housing to meet the needs of the Town? a. Density limit and other design parameters that influenced plan b. Inclusion of recreation areas c. Treatment of pedestrian "path" through site (unimproved/preserved `as- is') d. Points of access for emergency services? e. 20' landscape buffer along entire north side of property (no curb cuts) f. 18,000 square foot, drive-through fire station concept 2. Are there new opportunities for improved access points for emergency services? If so, do they also provide improved/worsened access and egress for adjacent properties (Shell station, residential properties)? 3. What other uses are needed, warranted and appropriate for the site? a. Recreational or open space amenities (active or passive, or both) b. Commercial/office (mixed use or "live/work") c. Municipal co-uses (Town offices, parking, emergency services sub- stations) d. Community meeting rooms 4. Can/Should the fire station/municipal facilities be integrated with the design of any residential (employee housing) component, or separated by terrain or with landscape buffers to insulate emergency services uses and impacts from surrounding residential uses? 5. Is this site a `neighborhood'? Is the Town designing an inclusive neighborhood or enclave for local workers -designed to compliment, enliven and enrich the surrounding area, while optimizing ("maximizing") the public investment in the property? 6. Who are we targeting this development towards? What are the preferred or recommended types, sizes and number of housing units? What do we have now and 7. Are units `For Sale' or some combination of for-sale, for-rent? 8. What is the right percentage of "affordable" units - 100%, 50%? 9. Should the Town pursue apublic/private venture or partnership to develop any part of the site? 10. Should the Town pursue LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification -with full third party documentation, and with potential r . _F for added costs - on any portion of the development, or should the Town seek to design and construct a "sustainable" and "certifiable" development, without actual certification and registry with the U.S. Green Building Council? 11. Should the Town explore options to develop public and/or "for-sale" parking on the site? If so, to what extent? 12. How "flexible" or expandable should the design be - to provide for current needs and to accommodate future growth? 13. What other design considerations are pertinent? a. Slope -stepping the development with the slope to minimize disturbance/grading and excavation (cost and environmental considerations) b. Connectivity to, through and from the site (surrounding pedestrian use, connectivity to/through Shell station and West Vail Mall area) c. Solar gain (aspect) d. Sustainable site design, architecture and development practices e. Views to, through and from site -respecting surrounding properties and preserving views through site to a reasonable extent; maximizing views from site and improving character of neighborhood as highly prominent development site f. Drainage and snow storage g. Utilities -any opportunities to improve service for surrounding properties/area h. Parking vs. proximity to public transportation (who will be living here?) i. On-site storage j. Long-term maintenance (paybacks from sustainable design and construction?)