Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB090043.~ mwxo~va¢ Cd3f«f.1:JNITY L7E4EI..C~MENT Design Review B©ard ACTIt?N FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 te1:970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.cvm Project Name: Eagle River Water Line Upsize DRB Number: DR6090043 Project Description: Participants: REMOVAL OF TWO, MAYBE THREE, LODGE POLE PINES TO REPLACE & UPGRADE THE EXISTING WATER LINE FROM 4 INCHES TO 10 INCHES. OWNER VAIL COLORADO MUNICIPAL BLDG 02/25/2009 75 S FRONTAGE RD VAIL CO 81657 APPLICANT EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATI 02/25/2009 Phone: 970-476-7480 846 FOREST ROAD VAIL CO 81657 License: 362-B Project Address: 75 S FRONTAGE RD WEST VAIL Location: LUPINE DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY Legal Description: Lot: Block: Subdivision: R.O.W. Parcel Number: 2101-064-0000-3 Comments: See Conditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Action: STAFFAPP Second By: Vote: Date of Approval: 03/06/2009 Conditions: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 201 (PLAN): DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval, pursuant to the Vail Town Code, Chapter 12-3-3: APPEALS. Cond: 202 (PLAN): Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0010580 The applicant shall obtain a Public Works right-of-way permit to perfomr the water line upgrades, prior to the start of the construction. Furthermore, the applicant shall comply with all Army Corps of Enginners requirements. Cond: CON0010581 The applicant shall install a minimum of three nursery grown evergreen trees with a minimum height of 12 feet on Lot 13, Bighorn Subdivision (4026 Lupine Drive) in conjunction with the removal of two mature Lodge Poles, prior to requesting final inspections. In the event additional trees are removed, each additional tree shall be replaced with a minimum of one additional nursey grown evergreen tree measuring a minimum of 12 feet in height. Planner: Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $0.00 Application for Design Review Minor Exterior Alteration General Information: This application is required for all proposals involving minor c~ng o~~~~}}~~,ild~i Brand si a im- provements, such as roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences, retainin w~~M~l~ ~Foli6~dl~ Vail Town Code sections can be found at www.vailgov.com under Vail Information -Town Code Online. All projects re- quiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department, as outlined in the submittal requirements. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Plan-. Wing and Environmental Commission. Design review approval expires one year from the date of approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction commences. i Fee: $250 for Multi-Family/Commercial $20 for Single Family/Duplex ~ Single Family Duplex Multi-Family ~ `6~,n I ~ `~ ""' Description of the Request: ~2 r'~'~o~ c.~ ~'~ ~'n,Jc7 L~G P Daly. n. t~~S I +1 ur~E~ Physical Address: I a t~.% t~ ~ kp i ~2 ~ ~ ~ ~ +q~~' ~ ©~ ~' ~% Ley Parcel Number: (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) _.~ ~i Property Owner: ~0~~ :~ O~ ~Q~1 f l /' / Mailing Address: ~~ ~. , i ~/~~~t ~~ V ~i i `I (aC~ C) ~ b ~~ Owner's Signature: Primary Contact/ Owner Red sentative: Mailing Address: ~~~ .~`'~~~ E-Mail• `~L'i~•~~J~ °C'~ Fax: n Phone: ~7/-_~ ~~ 7 r For OfFce Use Only: Cash_ CC: Visa / MC Last 4 CC # Auth # Check # Fee Paid: / ~ )!..i,/.2~- Received From: Meeting Date: DRB No.: /y~E1 g - (~ ~,~ Planner: Project No: ,/~GcJ U~!'C~~~ Zoning: Land Use: Location of the Proposal: Lot: Block: Subdivision: \ ~i, Za°a°o a corgi II \~ .~ ~ ~ R / II ~ ~ ~ a ~ W Q IJ~ ' ~ ~ I \\`TY.1.~ V . - .. . ~ __~- -_ ~~'I _°~ '~ ~-'-F ~I <>>~ ~~N <_ , =o, , ~ a. -__~ _, oo~g._ 1. CREEK GORE -~ ,,~ . ~ ,~- •rr ~ ~ << b. ~ ~.m. _,_ ~iJG ~ '" O II i a . _ ~o U ~ a li N~ w z I ' ~ I ~ a~ >Q ^ ~ / ~ a ~ ~ `~ 1 C 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i \ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~\ i " ~ / ~l ~ ~ 0 o ~ ; ~ ~ ' ~, o w _ -- i a 4 I r \ 1 zw ~ I ~ ~ wa b ` ~ r- ~ { { i~ J ~~ _ 3 L ,~ ~ ~ ~ C~.c ~C . ~ _ ~ F~CREEK /w ~- ~~ ~~D _~ ,~ ~ 0 \ i a ~~ ~ o Z W ~ ~ W i 0 /1 ~a U d O rn ro O a p w ~~ U ~ m W Z 1 I ~ Z u CIS ~- '^ I J i ~recisi~n ~ee ~orks, Inc. P.D. Box 606 • tiai! Colorado 81658 • (970) 926-3594 February 9, 2009 Mr. John Cahill, Construction Manager Eagle River Water & Sanitation District 846 Forest Rd Vail CO 81657 Re: Evaluation of 3 pines Dear John, On February 5, 2009, I met you at the east bridge of Lupine D. to evaluate the condition of 3 lodgepole pines. This brief report will summarize my findings. Limiting conditions: 1) Reported is limited to conditions observed only on the single site visit day. 2) Due to snow depth of 3' to 4', the trunk base and root collar were not inspected. All three mature pines are located immediately southeast of the junction of east Lupine Dr. and the Gore Creek bridge. All three pines are limbless the bottom 20' of trunk. All have minor signs of mistletoe (parasitic plant) infection, moderate amount of Western gall rust (a minor parasitic pathogen), and slightly chlorotic and sparse foliage. Two pines are 18" in diameter. The third pine is 15" in diameter. The heights range from 80' to 90' (measured with clinometer). The two pines closest to the river have very one-sided crowns, most likely due to the past loss of a tree within the direct path of the proposed trench. If after snow-melt the detection of a stump confirms this assumption, the proposed trench would encounter slightly less live roots from these three existing trees. The tree that exhibits the most defects is the pine closest to the bridge and road. This tree has a large Western gall rust canker on the main trunk at approximately a 40' ht. I consider this defect to be moderate. I also detected the top of what appears to be a large basal scare on the trunk at snowline (40" from the ground). Given limitation of the visible trunk, I did not detect any major structural defects. The condition of these trees is fair. Baring any major lower trunk, root collar, or buttress root defects, I currently consider these trees as worthy of attempting to save. Finally, I recommend an inspection of the trench to evaluate root damage. Sincerely, [Submitted by email) Mark Stelle, ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist S CA ~- n~~ ~MarkaStelle