The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMountain Haus Common Element 1990 - 1999[A MEMORANDUM Date: October 1, 1998 To: Todd Oppenhiemer From: George Ruther, Senior Planner Subject: Mountain Haus Tree Replacement Requirement in At your request, I reviewed the file on the Mountain Haus regarding the tree removal mitigation requirement. Pursuant to the file, on April 13, 1998, the applicant's representatives agreed to mitigate any tree removal required to construct the new west entry on a foot:foot or caliper:caliper basis, depending on the type of tree removed. My review of the survey indicates that two large coniferous trees and two deciduous trees were removed to accommodate the addition. According to the tree preservation plan prepared for the project, Trees #6, #7, #8 & #9 were removed. Trees #6 & #7 were deciduous and totaled 11.5 caliper inches in diameter. Trees #8 & #9 were coniferous and totaled 111 lineal feet in length. Historically, deciduous trees, when mitigated, are replaced on a caliper:caliper basis and coniferous trees are replaced on a foot:foot basis. If 111 lineal feet of coniferous trees can not be accommodated on site, I would recommend that some consideration for alternate mitigation be proposed. 09/24/98 08:54 FAX 9704764901 Fax Cover Sheet Date: September 24, 1998 To: Mike McGee/George Ruther Fax: 479-2176/479-2452 Re: Mtn Haus Standpipe Sender: Stephanie Lord FRITZLEN PIERCE CC: Tomas Zeisel, Mountain Haus 476-3007 John Railton, 949-5516 A R C Ff I T E C T S You should receive 2 page(s) including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, please call (970) 476-6342 Ext. 15. Mike and George - Per our site visit September 23, 1998 regarding the relocation of the standpipe connection: 1. It is my understanding that the original solution for relocating the standpipe connection which was reviewed with Mike McGee is not acceptable pHmarily because 1) the pipe needs to be lowered for aesthetic reasons, and 2) concern that there would not be enough room for plantings if the standpipe connection remains in the current location. i 2. At this mornings meeting we discussed that for TOV approval the pipe needs to lowered approximately 2'-3' so it is hidden behind the stone wall. A boulder wall needs to be added along the edge of sidewalk leading the Bradway's stair. The standpipe connection should sit upon the top of the boulder wall near the edge of the building. The connection requires a 12" clearance (top bottom and side) (See Option #1). After reviewing the solution with the Mtn Haus and Hyder we have a couple of concerns and propose the following alternative. 1. Lower the pipe as originally discussed, but locate the standpipe connection beneath the window on the West wall. Locate the standpipe so it has 1'-�0" clearance top, bottom and side. Option #2 shows the connection 2" on center from the sidewall and from the ground. K-19577-Mnnntain Na..c\QC77f`lTeo4At7 _ p�co...s..!\Co..ecpe..dvnoelTOV1....uEyE.p7'y7...Y.� j I I Planning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 0 Vail, CO 81657 • fps@colorado.net 0 fax (970) 476-4901 • (976) 476-6342 09/24/98 08:54 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE 14002 t 2. Create a planter that is not raised, but that is flush with ;tthe sidewalk. Fill the planter with trees and ground cover and 6" of wood chips or small rocks. Locate small boulders (flush with the sidewalk) so there is a level surface and easy access to the new connection. The pipe in this solution would not be buried beneath the earth, but covered with rocks and/or wood chips. Trees and ground cover would still be located in the planter. (See Option 42) We are proposing Option #2 for a couple of reasons. 1. If the standpipe is located above the boulders it would have to protruded at least 6" into the walkway to Bradway's unit. This would be a potential hazard at the bottom of his stairway and could be a liability concern for both him and the Mountain Haus. 2. If the planter is Y-0" deep, we could run into some potential waterproofing issues with the existing building if the area is not treated. 3. This solution provides all parties with the end desire of plantings and access to the standpipe connection without compromising the walkway area. If this solution is acceptable please send me an approval in writing. (it can be a copy of this fax with your signature). We obviously do not want to move the connection again without final written approval. If we needed to look at some additional options 'please call me ASAP. Thank you both for your help on this project. TC•\OG�7_lUnn..}oin Ll e..a10<77f_1To.1.011 _ D..a.---KQo-.,e.r...�.e..ITOVI...mg.F.04D]..rpd 09/24/98 08:54 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE 0 004 1 1,7 Le,�V- 'AAl-0 W/ Loc>c) d lz,44, VAW.LD e— �10 t6o VCC71-4 -C> --r_ L-c--:ym+ -1 Ill -k IP xv c CH op 6000 sysy PI TOWN OF PAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-2452 September 30, 1998 Stephanie Lord Fritzlen, Pierce & Smith 1650 Vail Valley Drive, Fallridge C-1 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Mountain Haus Standpipe VIA FACSIMILE 476-4901 Dear Stephanie Lord: I am in receipt of your letter regarding the proposed revisions to the required standpipe at the Mountain Haus. Following my review of the proposed revisions, please accept this letter as written approval from the Town of Vail of the revised plan. I am hopeful that this revision will be our last. Should you have any questions, please contact me. You can reach me by telephone at 479-2145. Sincerely,f ic� yL ' -�/ George Ruther, AICP Senior Planner to~) RECYCLEDPAPER TM 10/01/98 12:51 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE [A 001 Fax Cover Sheet Date: To: Fax: Re: Sender: October 1, 1998 George Ruther 479-2452 Mtn Haus Standpipe Stephanie Lord FRITZLEN PIERCE SMITH A R C H I T E C T S You should receive 6 page(s) including this cover sheet. If yob do not receive all the pages, please call (970) 476-6342 Ext. 15. George I am back!_ The solution for the standpipe connection location that you approved on 9-24-98 did not meet code and therefore the solution has been revised again. Based on our conversations I think the new solution meets all your requirements for plantings. ICould you review and again send back an approval if it is acceptable_ With any luck, this should be the last time. Thanks! K•19577..hifn....f_:.. u..�1nc��r�T�oo-ma _ noa.-.,.-��r�„�-„r,o„d�..�e\TONg.fiOl00L��ta Pianning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 EML Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 0 Vail, CO 81657 0 fps(q)coloradn_ner • fax (970) 476-4901 • (970) 476-6342 10/01/98 12:51 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE Fax Cover Sheet Date: October 1, 1998 To: Tomas Zeisel, 476-3007 Re: Mtn Haus Standpipe Sender: Stephanie Lord CC: Trevor Bradwa = y,�7� Mike McGee, 479-2176 George Ruther, 479-2452 Brian Engelking, Paul Klumhouse, 303-825-3223 16002 ERITZLEN PI E R C E SM I T H A R C H I T E C T S I You should receive 2 page(s) including this cover sheet. If yoiu do not receive all the pages, please call (970) 4766342 Ext. 15. Tomas - Per my discussions with Mike McGee, George Ruther, and the Standpipe installer, the TOV approved revision to the standpipe connection from last week does not meet code as currently shown. Due to the code restrictions and the TOV requirement for trees and shrubs to be planted in the same location, we are proposing the following solution. I did ask Mike McGee whether the standpipe was needed due to last year's installation of the fire sprinkler system It is my understanding that the standpipe is thelFire Departments only other alternative to fight a fire in the building_ Additionally, the stairwells are not sprinklered at this time, and the standpipe would be the only means to fight a fire in the stairwells. Therefore, it is important that the standpipe connection remain. The following solution is actually similar to our previous solution, however the pipe and connection locations have been modified to meet code. requirements (see attached plan, elevation, a section.) 1. Pipe Lower the pipe 12" inside the building. This will be the lowest point and location of drain. The connection and pipe will slope toward the drain. The pipe will be bidden by wood chips in the planter bed_ The section of pipe running east/west will be supported, as required by code, by a 2" dia support on a footing. v_Aoznl &.co.,....:.,sre Planning • ArChiteCture • fnlenars 1 1650 Farr Vail Valley Drive. Fallridge C.1 a Vail, CO 81657 • fps®nnlnradn-ner s fax (970) 476-4901 ■ (970) 476-6342 10/01/98 12:51 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE 2. Planter Bed Waterproof the existing building exterior walls so that 20" of new soil and wood chips can be infilled in the planter area Trees and shrubs will be planted on either side of the standpipe. Boulders approximately 32" high will be used to create the planter wall along the sidewalk. 3. Connection The connection will be located so it is flush with the sidewalk, but not protrude into the sidewalk. The connection must be 36" above finished grade_ The connection must have 2'-0" O -C_ clearance on all sides. Boulders will hide the vertical portions of the standpipe. 4. Visible Portions of Standpipe. The only visible portion of the standpipe will be the section of pipe running across the top of the boulder to the connection and the connection piece. I recommend the exposed Standpipe be painted a dark graylbrown to match the boulder. At this point I think- all parties are anxious to have this issue resolved. As you are aware, the solution is limited due to Fire Codes, TOV planting approvals, and liability issues for the Mountain Haus. As noted I have provided all parties involved with a copy of the plan to verify again that this solution meets everyone's requirements. 1 have asked Hyder to verify all installation code requirements with the installer. I have also requested written approval from the TOV again and believe that their concerns are addressed with the addition of the code compliance issues. Please call with any questions or comments_ - I:-1057-A[ou..tn:.. LinucW S�7C�TacicO l7 - D swmont\Corroeponda..caV.dt..I I.uccor.i�.OP70..�pd..vpd [Ao0s 10/01/98 12:51 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE li� 004 10/01/98 12:51 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE f1h 005 0 Ob I I� 10/01/98 12:51 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE 14006 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 10, 1998 SUBJECT: A request for a setback variance and a site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus, located at 292 East I Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Trevor Bradway, represented John Railton. Planner: George Ruther DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, Trevor Bradway, owner of Unit #101, Mountain Haus Condominiums, represented by John Railton, is requesting a setback variance and site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a new west entrance into Unit #101, Mountain Haus. The new west entry is intended to improve access into Unit #101 which is a commercial spaces within the Mountain Haus, as well as improve the fire safety of the building. The new entry will replace an existing sliding patio door and deck. The new entrance will be consructed in conjunction with the improvements that are already underway to the Mountain Haus west entry. Similar to the ongoing improvements, much of the new entry is proposed to be constructed on Town of Vail property within Slifer Plaza. If approved, the applicant will be required to execute a easement agreement with the Town of Vail. No additional trees will be removed as a result of this request. According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the Mountain Haus is located in the Public Accommodation Zone District. Pursuant to Sections 12-7A-6 and 12-7A-9 of the Municipal Code, the minimum side setback shall be 20 feet and the site coverage shall not exceed 55% of the total site area. The existing west side setback, in the location of the new entry addition, is one foot and the existing site coverage of the Mountain Haus is approximately 77%. The new entry addition is proposed to extend out from the building 4 feet and add approximately 30 square feet of additional site coverage. Therefore, the proposed improvements will result in a new west side setback of zero feet and the site coverage percentage will be increased to 78%. Since the minimum side setback for the Mountain Haus is 20 feet and the maximum site coverage is 55%, and the applicant is proposing to increase to existing non -conformity, a side setback variance of one foot and a site coverage variance of 1% are required. A copy of the plans and a letter of explanation from the applicant has been attached for reference. f:\everyone\pec\memos\mthaus. 413 1 TOWN OF Y�IL BACKGROUND On Tuesday, July 14, 1998, the applicant's representative met with the Town Council. The purpose of the meeting with the Town Council was to seek the Town Council's permission to proceed through the public planning process. The Town Council's permission is required, as the applicant is proposing to construct the new entry on a portion of Town of Vail property within Slifer Plaza. Upon hearing the applicant's request, the Town Council granted its permission to proceed through the planning process. The Council identified the following three issues which need to be addressed during the review process: Trees 2. Trees 3. Trees III. VARIANCE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 12-17-6, Variance Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback and site coverage variances. The recommendation for approval is based on the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors: The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff believes that the requested setback and site coverage variance will have minimal, if any, negative impacts on the other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity of the Mountain Haus. The new entry was designed in conjunction with entry improvements currently underway and the Town's improvements to Slifer Plaza. The location of the improvements will not hinder pedestrian circulation in Slifer Plaza. Pedestrian safety may actually be enhanced as the new entry will improve the access and improve fire safety within the building. As mentioned previously, if approved, the applicant will be required to execute a easement agreement with the Town of Vail. Staff is concerned with the proposed location of the new entrance into the commercial space. The new entrance will be significantly screened from pedestrian view by the large existing trees in Slifer Plaza. This will make it very difficult to provide all important display window frontage for the space. While we are not suggesting that the applicant not pursue this request, we would like to provide notice to the applicant regarding the difficulties of locating the entrance in the proposed location. The applicant has proposed a new display window on the building. The f:\everyone\pec\memos\mthaus.413 2 window is to be located on the west side of the building between the entrance to Unit #101 and the new west entry to the Mountain Haus. The display would require the removal of a proposed aspen tree which is to be planted upon completion of the Mountain Haus entrance. The purpose of the tree is to help provide vertical screening of the Mountain Haus. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Staff believes the applicant has requested the minimum amount of relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of the setback and site coverage regulations necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity among sites in the vicinity of the Mountain Haus and within the Public Accommodation Zone District. The proposed entry will only encroach one foot further into the setback than the building currently encroaches in the location of the entrance. Other areas of the building on the west side encroach further into the setback, and in fact, some areas are off the applicant's property and onto Town of Vail property. In terms of additional site coverage, the new addition, while more permanent and substantial nature, results in a slight increase in site coverage. Staff believes the additional site coverage is warranted and will not result in a special privilege as the Mountain Haus was constructed prior to zoning. The relationship of the existing structure to the current development standards prohibit the applicant from ever constructing improvements to the building without a variance. Staff believes this to be an extraordinary circumstance or exceptional condition. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The proposed variances will have little, if any, effect on these factors. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict and literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. f:\everyone\pec\memos\mthaus.413 b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback and site coverage variances. Staff's recommendation of approval is based upon the review of the Criteria and Factors outlined in Section III of this memorandum. Should the Planning and Environmental choose to grant an approval of the applicant's request, staff would recommend the Planning and Environmental Commission make the following findings: That the granting of the setback and site coverage variances do not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the setback and site coverage limitations on other properties in the Public Accommodation Zone District. 2. That the granting of the setback and site coverage variances will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of Unit#101, Mountain Haus. 3. That the setback and site coverage variances are warranted since the strict interpretation or enforcement of the setback and site coverage regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Public Accommodation Zone District, as the Mountain Haus is an existing building constructed prior to Town's adoption of zoning regulations. f:\everyone\pec\memos\mthaus.413 4 m z` m N 0 1998 RECEIVED JU '99BTrevor & Celeste Bradway Q � r- L- VV C-.f_�. Ji b PO Box 2583 Vail, CO 81658 (970) 476-1117 Fax (979) 476-3264 June 1, 1998 Mr. Rob Ford, Mayor VAIL TOWN COUNCIL Town of Vail, Vail, CO 81657 Reference: Mountain Haus West Side Entrance/Bradway Addendum Request for permission to use Town of Vail Land Dear Rob: Sam and I are owners of four commercial Mountain Haus condominium units which are adjacent to Slifer Plaza and right next to the proposed new Mountain Haus west entrance. You are probably familiar with the Mountain Haus Associations' request for land to construct their new west side entrance which I believe has already been approved by Council. The Mountain Haus' proposal was recently amended slightly to better suit the needs of adjacent unit owners including ourselves. Both we and the Mountain Haus would prefer that our customers access our facility from the outside rather than through the building and Fire Marshall Mike McGee also sees the relocation of our present main access (now inside the building) to the outside as a significant fire safety improvement. Our architect came up with what we all believe is the best approach to this which is reflected in the enclosed elevation and plan. As you can see, our entrance access would be separate but integrated with the Mountain Haus access and our walk and steps would be architecturally compatible. We are aware of the concern about exiting trees and landscaping and, while our small addition to the Mountain Haus plan is some five to six feet from existing trees, we are retaining the services of Mark Stelle of Precision Tree Works to amend his previously submitted report to take our plan into consideration. It appears that we only require a few hundred square feet additional to that which has already been approved and we would hope this may be accomplished through an minor addendum or revision of the ground lease agreement between the Mountain Haus and Town of Vail. We expect our small walk and steps would be Mountain Haus common elements (as would the entrance) and they would be the sole lessee. MHOII.WPS 6/1/98 RI PAGE TWO OF TWO PAGES Our end of the overall West Entrance construction project is relatively minor and we would expect to have everything completed this fall if not sooner. We have been working with George Ruther on all this and will stay in close touch with him. We and our architect are available for any questions you or staff may have. ook forward to your favorable decision on our request. Best Trelor & Celeste Bradway Enc/ Elevation and Plan Copy/ George Ruther File/ Mountain Haus West Entrance MH101 MHOII.WPS 61/96 f / /� O c A.1776 -1 /44US 60lE=i - Z' v+cCEss i5 ppaovior-U A41E L!o ciuc55rio"5 O H'I �O Coc1�=�i�T• A. 10 % 55 c tE5 . -DA?$ d7%C'1'uA5�gE ?lv z-lfi'4? p1,4z.rh5ses 4-65 !00�9' JoV" : 645-MCJ-JT rA-996EPMEX47- Coc1Ft'��_vY�4-rl'�...1 0� �4-7��•4- � b u i ld i c..(g �E�¢.w4f'.Mo v4vo i A•oi.t t+L, 'Rc- mvE44 -Drzg, b o4-DoaEss 641ca wta« J -o t* ppgovc I . *J FILE COPY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Monday, August 10, 1998 FINAL AGENDA Proiect Orientation / LUNCH -Community Development Department MEMBERS PRESENT Greg Moffet John Schofield Galen Aasland Ann Bishop (left at 4:30) Brian Doyon Tom Weber Site Visits : MEMBERS ABSENT Diane Golden 1. Glen Lyon - 1000 S. Frontage Rd. West 2. Spad International - 1337 Vail Valley Drive 3. Mountain Haus - 292 East Meadow Drive �> Driver: George Updated 7/28 1pm 12:00 p.m. 12:45 p.m. NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing, - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. A request for additional GRFA, utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for a bedroom and bathroom addition to a two-family residence, located at 1337 Vail Valley Drive/ Lot4, Block 3, Vail Valley First Filing. Applicant: Spad International (Zevada), represented by Railton -McEvoy Architects Planner: Christie Barton MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Galen Aasland VOTE: 6-0 APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS: 1. That the plywood siding be removed and the siding upgraded to meet the minimum requirements in the Design Guidelines(Title 12, Chapter 11.5.C). 2. That the chimney be brought into compliance with the Design Guidelines. TOWN *V& Updated 7/28 1 pm 5. A worksession to discuss an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon), revising the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West/Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg Planner: Dominic Mauriello/George Ruther WORKSESSION — NO VOTE 6. A final review of a conditional use permit for a proposed addition to the Vail Interfaith Chapel, located at 19 Vail Road/ Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey/Pratt Architects Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 24, 1998 7. A request for an amendment to a previously approved plan for the Timber Falls Development, located at 4469 Timber Falls Court/unplatted. Applicant: RAD Five L.L.C., represented by Greg Amsden Planner: Dominic Mauriello TABLED UNTIL AUGUST 24, 1998 8. Information Update 9. Approval of July 27, 1998 minutes. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information. Community Development Department FILE COPY A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus, located at 292 East Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association Planner: George Ruther George Ruther gave an overview of the staff memo. Greg Moffet asked for any applicant input. Stephanie Lord, representing the applicant, said the west entry solution was being worked out in conjunction with the Town's redevelopment of Slifer Plaza. Greg Moffet asked for any public input. There was none. John Schofield said the Town Council would see this. Greg Amsden had no comments. Galen Aasland stated that this was a long-standing problem, but if someone built a new building next to this we could not approve the same request. Diane Golden had no additional comments Greg Moffet agreed with Galen. John Schofield asked if Todd Oppenheimer had anything to do with the tree preservation plan. Greg Barrie, a landscape architect with the Town of Vail, said he had been working with the Mountain Haus and was trying to put together a comprehensive design with the Slifer Plaza Master Plan and said that the Mountain Haus improvements complimented the master plan. Stephanie Lord said they wanted to save the north tree, but in reality can't, but would put in some ornamental trees, such as crabapple, to bring some human scale into the entry way. Diane Golden asked if they really thought out the crabapple tree idea, as it might be a mess with the children playing in the fountain. Galen Aasland agreed with Diane Golden. Stephanie Lord said they could use another kind of ornamental tree. John Schofield said that Clark Brittain, from the DRB, disagreed with the loss of the 3 large trees. Greg Amsden had no additional comments. George Ruther said the applicant should have a foot -to -foot mitigation plan. Greg Amsden stated they didn't have the ground to do that. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes March 23, 1998 12 E Lynn Fritzlen stated the applicant wanted to work in conjunction with the Town George Ruther said there was no way to plant trees on the Mountain Haus property, but other opportunities existed. Galen Aasland said the 3 large aspens taken out needed a foot per foot equitable arrangement . Greg Moffet said he wanted a mitigation plan and hated to see large evergreen trees taken out, as it was too urbanizing. He stated he wanted to see the location of the mitigation as prominent as it was now. Greg Barrie said the Town was starting construction on the plaza in early May Lynn Fritzlen stated they needed to get going in early May, but we need to finalize our plan when the Town finalizes their plan. Galen Aasland said we needed a commitment from you as to what was being removed. George Ruther said it was important to the Town Council to understand what the benefits to the Town would be, since the entry was on Town of Vail property. He said we would put together an easement agreement. Lynn Fritzlen said the benefit would be to enhance the restaurant downstairs which would be separated from the main hotel. She said the new improvements would solve some mechanical problems they had and would cut down on odors. Greg Moffet suggested it would be a good space for outdoor dining. Lynn Fritzlen said we had originally thought of a sunken plaza, but the noise might be a factor. She said a benefit to the Town would be that the security problems with the open door to the hotel from the past would no longer be a problem and therefore, the police would be there less. Greg Amsden said we needed to preserve the restaurant space we already have in this Town. Greg Moffet was in agreement with Greg Amsden. George Ruther stated that the applicant would need a site coverage variance and setback variance and would like to do a PEC straw poll on the proposed mitigation and design. The PEC was in favor of this request by a straw poll of 5-0. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes March 23, 1998 13 Date 'iove: Project Titleep-/VakAy Project Number -!3�e O To/Aftending Rio T -- -� N A9- - 61WAAWuuz l DEv - PWT. Copies to . *!S;:7. Regarding ' l /j�l� //�►� J��A% RAILTON-WEVOY Page / of A R C H I T E C T S Memorandum 0 Meeting 0 Telecon 0 Field Report 0 Drawing Rv FAx Rv W PROJECT CONCEPTS • RESIDENCES RESTORATION • CORPORATE DESIGN 954 Pearl St., Boulder, CO 80302 (303) 443-4353. FAX 4435535 P.O. Box 430 Awn, Colorado 81620 (970) 949-5595. FAX 9495516 TOWS Questiory4all the Planning Staff at 479-213` APPLICATION FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION APPROVAL GENERAL INFORMATION This application is for any project requiring approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission. For specific information, see the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. The application can not be accepted until all required information is submitted. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Design Review Board. A. TYPE OF APPLICATION: G. NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: JDNAI R,410W), .9,4147 -OA/ MCEt/OY #&#17-,6U7S MAILING ADDRESS: fO 9&! 4f3'U �1/O/✓ PD/�aRpO PHONE: •H. G, FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE. SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657. For Office Use Only: gy�pp\�� Fee Paid: �c""Ck#: 47� By: Application Date: 1/ —l'37 �1 PEC Meeting Date: 10M Revised 6/96 ❑ Additional GRFA (250) ❑ Amendment to an Approved Development Plan ❑ Bed and Breakfast ❑ Employee Housing Unit (Type: ) ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Major or ❑ Minor CCI Exterior Alteration ❑ Major or Cl Minor Subdivision (Vail Village) i ; ❑ Rezoning ❑ Major or ❑ Minor CCII Exterior Alteration ❑ Sign Variance (Lionshead) Variance ❑ Special Development District ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Major or ❑ Minor Amendment to an SDD B. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: SIT G0L)tER4A4t::�2�L 'SZ7 6A -C& Ui1?21*0E -60 AC66MAAZ1QA7e- 6" -tC) BRAQ (NA�f :74 iVy vitt' - /V,6VNT ?N ftUG UNIT 10t. C. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT BLOCK FILING pg- 01c 7T ..im-r1- /sem F/[,�N� ADDRESS: 2q?- E. MFJ4PQkJ XWE BUILDING NAME: H00A -,q1N Haus. D. ZONING: E. NAME OF OWNER(S): lr�y�� `cL6ETE7 4Sr1L-AQUJA ' MAILING ADDRESS: S8 (JL} �C CD • gl'6SB PHONE: -ef— 76 F. OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S): G. NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: JDNAI R,410W), .9,4147 -OA/ MCEt/OY #&#17-,6U7S MAILING ADDRESS: fO 9&! 4f3'U �1/O/✓ PD/�aRpO PHONE: •H. G, FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE. SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657. For Office Use Only: gy�pp\�� Fee Paid: �c""Ck#: 47� By: Application Date: 1/ —l'37 �1 PEC Meeting Date: 10M Revised 6/96 ON U/ a W n J SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A VARIANCE I. PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE A pre -application conference with a planning staff member is strongly encouraged. No application can be accepted unless it is complete. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to determine additional submittal requirements. 11. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FEE: $250.00. The fee must be paid at the time of submittal. Stamped, addressed envelopes and a list of the names and mailing addresses of all property owners adjacent to the subject property, including properties behind and across streets. The applicant is responsible for correct names and mailing addresses. This information is available from the Eagle County Assessor's office. A written statement of the precise nature of the variance requested and the specific regulation involved. A written statement addressing the following: • The relationship of the regiiested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. • The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. • The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. • How your request complies with Vail's Comprehensive Plan. A preliminary title report, including schedules A and B, to verify ownership and easements. ac. I" �, � el�� Condominium Association approval (if applicable). Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as determined by the Administrator. Four (4) copies of the following ❑ A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least V = 20' stamped by a Colorado licensed surveyor including locations of all existing improvements, including grades and elevations. Other elements which must be shown are parking and loading areas, / ingress and egress, landscaped areas and utility and drainage features. C� A site plan at a scale of at least V = 20' showing existing and proposed buildings. Page 1 of 2 ..f O Building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed on the site. For interior modifications, an improvement survey and site plan may be waived by the Administrator III. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS CAN BE ACCEPTED. ALL OF THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE DEEMED COMPLETE. IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS A. The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A complete application form and all accompanying material (as described above) must be accepted by the Community Development Department by the appropriate submittal date, which is a minimum of four (4) weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearing. Incomplete applications (as determined by the planning staff) will not be accepted. B. All PEC approved variances shall lapse if construction is not commenced within one year of the date of approval and diligently pursued to completion, or if the use for which the approval is granted is not commenced within one year. V. ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES A. If this application requires a separate review by any local, State or Federal agency other than the Town of Vail, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of such review, may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Department of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc. B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which arc in excess of 50% of the application fee. If, at the applicant's request, any matter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter to be re -published, then, the entire fee for such re -publication shall be paid by the applicant. C. Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have design, land use or other issues which may have a significant impact on the community may require review by consultants in addition to Town staff. Should a determination be made by the Town staff that an outside consultant is needed, the Community Development Department may hire the consultant. The Department shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay the consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time of filing an application. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town. Any excess funds will be returned to the applicant upon review completion. Page 2 of 2 May 28, 1998 MOUNTAIN HAUS NEW PATHWAY AND WEST ENTRANCE TO BRADWAY TENANCY Site Coverage and Set Back Variance. PROPERTY: 292 E. Meadow Drive Lot 5 Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1" Filing ZONING: Public Accommodation District DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: On behalf of the Mountain Haus Condominium Association we are requesting the construction of a new walkway with stairway, as an extension of the walkway, currently proposed, leading from Slifer Plaza to the Mountain Haus West Entrance. This walkway would connect from the proposed north walkway, and provide access onto the existing deck, to the Bradway Tenancy within the Mountain Haus. Additionally, this proposal provides for enclosure of the existing deck, to provide an airlock, and extension of the size of the existing west facing fixed glass window of the first floor level of the Bradway Tenancy. COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES/HARMONY MAINTAINED This new pathway was designed in conjunction with the pathway design by Fritzlen Pierce & Briner Architects for the Mountain Haus West Entrance. The glass enclosure to the west deck and extended west window, are designed with divided glass areas more appropriate to an office space tenancy at pedestrian level. EFFECT OF THE VARIANCE The distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, and utilities are not impacted. The public safety is improved by providing clearer direction, lighting, and snowmelt into the Bradway Tenancy. COMPLIANCE WITH VAIL'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Goal 1.2 - Upgrading buildings - Encourage the continued upgrading and enhansement of existing lodging and commercial facilities. The Mountain Haus West Entry together with the proposed Bradway Tenancy entrance and glazed areas improves the aesthetic of the Mountain Haus by adding visual interest, detail, a variety of wood, stone, and metal materials, and adding human scale and pedestrian activity to the West Facade. Goal 1.3 - Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town. The Town of Vail contacted the Mountain Haus regarding the renovation of Slifer Plaza. The design of the Mountain Haus West Entry has occurred in conjunction with the Slifer Plaza design and is intended to further enhance the edges of the Slifer Plaza. The materials, landscape and footprint all complement and support goals for Slifer Plaza. These additional proposals further extend these goals. RAILTON-WEVOY A R C H IT E C T S A V 0 N Goal 2.5 - Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing PROJECT CONCEPTS • RESIDENCES lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests INTERIORS • LANDSCAPEDESIGN P.O. Box 430 Avon, Colorado 81657 (303) 949.5595• FAX 949.5516 The Mountain Haus has been working on their long term goals to improve the usefulmess and safety at the Mountain Haus. The proposed entry to the Bradway Tenancy improves this facility by providing separate public access to a commercial office, diverting pedestrian public traffic from the residential guest entrance to the Mountain Haus. This will improve safety and security for the Mountain Haus residential tenants and guests. The proposed entrance provides a better and safer entrance and exit from this tenancy, with improved fire safety aspects of escape and fire fighting access. The landscape design continues the stone planter walls, flower beds and paving proposed for Slifer Plaza and for the new west entrance to the Mountain Haus. The Mountain Haus has an office tenancy, Bradway Enterprises, located within a residential building, and in a space originally designed for a residential unit use. Its business activity, access and visibility is handicapped by a lack of (1) direct public entry and (2) office/storefront glass. Our clients proposal improves the function, public access and visibility of their tenancy space. It also provides improved pedestrian scale and landscape using construction materials compatible with those used for the Slifer Plaza and new west entrance to the Mountain Haus. Goal 3.1 - Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements The design of the New West Entry and Bradway Tenancy entry and glazing is intended to bring down the scale of the Mountain Haus and improve the pedestrian experience for both people entering the facility and those viewing the facility from Slifer Plaza and the Covered Bridge. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES/PHYSICAL HARDSHIP RELIEF FROM STRICT AND LITERAL INTERPRETATION The Mountain Haus has an office tenancy, Bradway Enterprises, located in the building that is extremely difficult to promote due to its location inside the building, restricted visibility of the existing entry, and the surrounding trees that screen the building. Per the PEC, keeping viable commercial space functioning in Vail is a TOV Goal. The new pathway will help promote a difficult commercial location. Improving function and aesthetic to bring the facility into the next decade is a goal. Due to the existing conditions, any renovation/improvement that the Mountain Haus proposes will be on TOV land. This provides the TOV with an opportunity to encourage development that meets TOV objectives and needs. PEC SUBMITTAL MOUNTAIN HAUS New West Entrance Site Coverage, Set Back, and Landscaping Variance Location of Proposal: Mountain Haus 292 E. Meadow Drive Vail, Co 81657 Zoning: Public Accommodation District Lot Size: 21,610.35 sq.ft Proposal: Enclosure of existing west deck to Bradway Tenancy Approx dimensions 7'X5' = 35 sq.ft New bay window on west elevation Approx. dimensions 6'X2' = 12 sq.ft See attached sketches. Site Coverage Variance (12-7A-9) Non -conforming existing condition Required: Shall not exceed 55% of the total site area 21,610.35 sq.ft X .55 = 11,885.69 sq.ft Actual: 17,909.20 sq.ft Proposed: 47 sq.ft Set Back Variance 912-7A-6) Non -conforming existing condition Required: Minimum front, side, and rear setback shall be twenty feet. Actual: Zero Proposed: Existing deck extends approx. V-0" over west property line. Landscape and Site Development (12-7A-10) Required: At least 30% of the total site area shall be landscaped Proposed: No reduction in square footage area -change in landscaping elements. 3 I%. Vail's in �Pus of the Covered Bridge Trevor & Celeste Bradway P. O. Box # 2583 Vail, CO. 81658 Dear Trevor: C(DF)y June 15, 1998 Ref: Mountain Haus West Side Entrance Proposed Exterior Entrance to #101' This is to advise you that the Mountain Haus Condominium Association approves you to proceed with the Town of Vail approval process and the PEC application dated June 15, 1998. The Association is in support of a separate exterior entrance to your Unit #101 that would work in conjunction with the new West Entry. Final approval of your design is required by the Mountain Haus Condominium Association Board of Directors before construction can occur. Sincere mas e Gene Mai Mountain Haus 292 East Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado 81657 • 970/476-2434 • FAX 970/476-3007 http://vail.net/mtnhaus • e mail: mtnhausOOvail.net • For Reservations: 800/237-0922 Mountain Haus Adjacent Owners: Property: Adjacent Fountain and Plaza, Parking Structure Owner: Town of Vail c/o Finance Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Property: Vail Athletic Club P Owner: Vail Limited Partnership 6827 Cedarbrook Drive Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301-3018 t 07/15/98 08:47 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE ML• MORANDUM TO: George Ruther FROM: Stephanie Lord DATE: July 15, 1998 IE: Mountain flans West Entry A R C H I T E C T 5 IA 001 Based on the approval granted at the last Final DRB Review of the Mountain Haus's West Entry, FPB and Hyder Construction are proceeding to start construction on July 15, 1998_ We are aware that several items still needed to be finalized. Following is a list of outstanding items that need to be resolved: 1. Land Exchange Agreement The land exchange agreement has not been finalized at this point. From our conversations, the agreement would not involve a lease payment, but the Mountain Haus would be obligated to maintain the property within deEned boundaries. I have requested a copy of a similar TOV document from Tom Moorhead for the Mountain Haus lawyer to review and revise. Please let me know if there is anything else we can do before we get a sample agreement. 2. Landscaping The Mountain Haus has included the planting of (10) 14' to 16' Bristle Cone Pines and (4) 21/2" caliper aspen trees in their scope of work. This is based on DRB conditions that we replace the evergreen trees on a foot per foot basis and aspen trees by caliper that are being removed due to the new entry. We are awaiting TOV direction on the placement of these trees. As you know, the Mountain Haus site is limited in space for trees and TOV Public Works had some preliminary recommendations on placement. We would like to schedule the tree planting and the same time we are landscaping, please provide direction on the final location. 3. Scope of Work The boundary lines for the scope of work to be performed by the Mountain Haus vs. TOV have shifted due to the schedule changes. Per conversations with Greg Barrie, TOV Public Works, the demolition in our original scope of work has already been completed. Greg stated he would provide the Mountain Haus with written documentation of any new requirements regarding the paving. - I�:��27-Mn��nualn Hous\9J�7(.1T�c1017 - u--�••�.u�o^n �p4^'�"^^^�� Planning • Archilertu 1 G50 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 w Vail, CO 81657 9 fp6( a .. 07/15/98 08:47 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE Z002 4. Roof Material During the Permit Process, Gary Goodell and Mike McGee requested that the roofing material be changed to a non-combustible Class A rated material. FPB is proposing to use either a 1) copper shingle; 2) coated metal shingle; or 3) High definition asphalt shingles- Cost of the solution and aesthetic are the major concern, which we can hopefully resolve at the DRB Meeting on July 15, 1998. Gary Goodell has stated he would issue a demolition/foundation permit until this final item is resolved_ As stated above, we were moving forward with the start of construction assuming this items would be resolved in accordance with earlier conversations_ Please let me know if this is unacceptable. 'hanks again, for all your help with this project. Please call with any questions or comments. JUL-07-1990 14:10 VAIL FIRE DEPT. 970 479 2176 P.01 Trevor & C' -e ksU Bradwtry PO Bos 2.183 Vai4 CO 81668 MM) 476-W71 F¢ qM 476-n" July 7, 1998 W Mc4d McGee, Fire Mil Via Tolec-opier 479-2I76 TOWN OF VAIL 42 West Mes&w Drive Vail, CO 81-657 Ytefereace; Bradway Mountain Haus West Sidi Entrance Project Dear Mike. 1 understand that our ground lease request to the Town Council (scheduled to be head June 23) was "pulled" by the Town Attorney as he felt the agreemeirt we had struck- carlier (as outlined in your April 24 letter to Scott Johnson) was not definitive enough. We thought this constituted our agreement to sprinkle our units and we w= simply waiting to first determine whether we would be sprinkling for a retail configuration or an office configuration. That determination binges on a change to the Mountain Haus declaration. However, to clarify matters and to move our applications fur our wtst side entrance and other improvements along, we Agee to sprinkle our units this fall regardless of the outcome of a declaration change. As the Mountain Haus only permits such work to be done during their £all hiatus (October 12 - November 21) w we would complete that work (and other unprovemerus) during that period. Hopefully this will clarify our position and our applications can now go forward. As everyone knows we are on a very tight umdine, p"cularily as our west entrance Project dovetails with the Mountain Haus's new west entvancc, so we need to move along i Quickly as ossible with the process or we may lose the opportunity I assume you will caking with George Ruther and the Town Attorney. I'm sure George will let know when Council will be hearing our request. As always, thanks for your help. Very trtx yours l/ T r Bradway, PE Copy/ Jolty Railton Scott Johmn File/ NM13."4 TOTAL P.01 I � r 107/14/98 17:02 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCIi JUL 14 IS�3 MEMORANDUM TOMDMI'Mir DR DEPT TO: Gary Goodell, TOV Building Department 479-2452 Mike McGee, TOV Fire Department 479-2176 Perry Mathews, BFPE 303-288-2428 FROM: Stephanie Lord DATE: July 14, 1998 RE: Mountain Haus West Entry Fire Protection V (AUu1 A R C H I T E C T S Based on conversations with all parties, FPB is proposing the following system to meet the fire protection concerns at the new West Entry. 1. The new roofW&MAWO will be rated Non -Combustible Class A. We are presenting two optio copper shingl s o the TOV DRB on July 15, 1998 to determine se eco will forward the approved roofing material specification to all parties. 2. Gary Goodell requested that glazing directly above the new roof in the West Stairwell y be replaced with 45 minute rated glazing. FPB is proposing to use Safti SuperLite H - 45 min or equal. 3. Gary Goodell requested that all other glazing in the West Stairwell be tempered glass. FPB has confirmed with the Mountain Haus maintenance staff, that to the best of their knowledge the glazing is tempered. We believe this will limit the likely hood of a fire starting and spreading from the new structure and also limit a fire's ability to enter the west stairwell. Unless notified otherwise, the above mentioned design changes will meet all of the TOV code requirements based on my understanding of the issues. Thank you all for all your help on this matter. Please call with any questions or comments. c K:VJ27-Mounraln ISaua19JZ7G1T�uKOlJ - Ontomon \CortoypondcnwVo�mamoOTl7...p.1 Planning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 0 Vail, CO 81657 0 fpbarcht@vail.net • fax (970) 476-4901 a (970) 476-6342 1107/20/98 08:01 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCI; a 001 Fax Cover Sheet Date: July 20, 1998 To: Gary Goodell Fax: 479-2452 Re: Mountain Haus West Entry Sender: Stephanie Lord CC: Mike McGee, TOV Fire Department - 479-2176 Brian Engelking, Hyder - 303-825-1313 A R C H I T E C T S You should receive 2 page(s) including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages please call (970) 476-6342 Ext. 15 - Gary - Attached is the DRB approved roof specification with a Class A Rating. Per your conversation with Lynn Fritzleu, it is my understanding that a Class A Roof Specification will satisfy the TOV requirements regarding the permit requirements. West Entry Roof Material - Manufacturer: Vai 1 Metal System Product Material: Riva Classic Series - 16 oz solid copper Finish: Pre -aged copper Fire Rating: Class A - installation per manufacturer's guidelines Attached are the specifications from Vail Metal System. Please call with any questions or comments. Thank you for your help on this project \ }::\9527-Mnu,rcw:.. I I:.,,cwS77r'1T...LA�a _ Rw.a.no.n\TLC-TAvwPp,c,c. v„\wpd\66rfo107717.9.y.! Planning • Architecture • Interiors 7 650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 0 Vail, CO 61657 9 fpbWalorado.nec • fax (970) 476-4901 . (970) 476-6342 07/20/98 08:01 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE PROb CT SPE _ I ECATION. - 1� Physical Data: Pancl Length: 34" long_ Panel Width: 12" wide_ Exposure Area per panel: 32.5" x 1 I.5" exposure per panel. Pastels per Square: 39 panels per square. Weight per Panel: 3.5 lbs, copper, 2.7 lbs, 26 -gauge Weight per Square: 136.5 lbs, copper, 106.7 lbs, 26 -auge. Product Material: 1) RIVA CLASSIC: 16 oz, solid capper. 2) RIVA SELECT: 26 gauge Kynar 500 coated Galvalusne available in 25 colors. Installation Clips: 2 installation clips required per panel, 78 per square. Clips also required for hip or ridge flashings, 2 per 12" piece, Trim Flashing: All n'iltt flashings available in 10' lenadhs. Flat stock also availablc for contractor fabricaTiou. Pacicat*inQ: Product delivered in 34.25 x 5.75 x 12" boxes containing 13 panels each. 3 boxes equals one square. Warranty: l) 50 year material defects on RIVA CLASSIC 2) 30 year snarerial dcfeeds oat RIVA SFUXT 3) 30 year Kynar 500 finish warranty *All specifications apply to RIVA SELECT and RIVA CLASSIC Lincs except where noted. Testing: [A 002 1) Underwriters L9boratories conducted Class A eonabustihie and noncombLLstihlc roof deck lire teci5 in accordance with the Test Standard ANSI/UL 790, -Tcsis for Fire Rcsisi:=x of Roof Covering Mfiterials-. (ASTM 1-'-103. "Fire fcsts of Roof Cocennis-). Ree-ufled in I.isling a; Class A rnnfenvcring when installed in accordance with monufacturcr'i installation auidellnes 2) l lnderwrhers Labaratories conducted wind resistance rests in accordance with tlit equipment and procedures as outlined to Ni3ndard UL 997. -Wind Resistance ufPrcparcd RoofCovcriog Materials" (ASTM D3161). Resulted in Listing as a wind resistanl roof coaenng. caaluarcd ar wield velucities up To 110 miles per hour. when installed in uecordanee with man0fa:tUrCt"s imtalladnn n_uidelines. 3) Passed rh: Dude County, Florida Protocol PA 100-1)4 Wind Driven Rain -rest For determination of mater inlilu i6on restswncc or'n discontinuous roofsysiem. Product passed tell with wind speeds raised io 110 miles per hour ar'ilh eater innoduced at the ram of S.E Inches per huurwkh oo Icala 11—du Gr also p j jnc .--d Winn a'rl��r iia �e:I inn —I to ff yap I�uu�... i.l� _gall w 1 J miles per hour, with nu systm failure. 4) Passed Peneuatirio Testing in accordance with ICAO Acceptance Criteria for Special Rooting S%stents (p;ira,-raph -I.'_). �N07/20/98 08:01 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE: Field Panel Clip Attachmc>at: 11 When installing the field panels, you will attach Two (2) clips per panel (all panels, regardless of size). Each clip is installed by even spacing at the top of the panel_ Do not attach clips where the upper "cleat" of the panel is doubled_ Anchor each clip using 1 nail per clip. When using RIVA Classic panels, all components, including fasteners must be copper. *Riva panel shown is upright. The "water channel' is on the left side and is open upwards. Water Channel y 'Note: Do not mach clip ov& Jovblcd 9rca of pa Fireproof Installatians: For installation as a Class A prepared roof -covering, the panels should be installed over a minimum 15/32" plywood decking covered with one ply Type 30 asphalt saturated felt base sheet followed by either'/z" thick Type -X gypsum board or 1/4" thick Georgia Pacific Corp_ "Dens -Deck" overlayment board. *Anyone living in a region of the country where snow and ice exist, needs to be aware of the potential hazards associated with failing snow and ice from roofs. Roofs that are over pedestrian areas or driveways_ etc. need the most attention. A homeoxvner should address the issue of safety with the aid of snow retention devices. snow clips, show fences_ etc., installed per specifications from an architect or engineer. Technical Assistance: For assistance in custom detailing, specifications, or installing Vail Metal Systems Riva Series metal panel. rall• (,97(1) 949_1l17R t-t,ulrc fiom 8:00 to s:oo K4ST. (tiJN 0 3 + U i Fireproof Installatians: For installation as a Class A prepared roof -covering, the panels should be installed over a minimum 15/32" plywood decking covered with one ply Type 30 asphalt saturated felt base sheet followed by either'/z" thick Type -X gypsum board or 1/4" thick Georgia Pacific Corp_ "Dens -Deck" overlayment board. *Anyone living in a region of the country where snow and ice exist, needs to be aware of the potential hazards associated with failing snow and ice from roofs. Roofs that are over pedestrian areas or driveways_ etc. need the most attention. A homeoxvner should address the issue of safety with the aid of snow retention devices. snow clips, show fences_ etc., installed per specifications from an architect or engineer. Technical Assistance: For assistance in custom detailing, specifications, or installing Vail Metal Systems Riva Series metal panel. rall• (,97(1) 949_1l17R t-t,ulrc fiom 8:00 to s:oo K4ST. (tiJN 0 3 + U 1NEST CORRIDOR RESTAURANT NEW EMERGENCY EXIT DOORS COORDINATE AITH KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM INFILL EXISTING ATRIUM WINDOW BAY W/ 2HR FIRE RATED kNALL BREAKAWAY DOORS @ BASEMENT 1/4"=I --o" TZLEN PIERCE BRINER — PROgGT NAI` -E, 155UE DArt DETAIL NUMBER PLA '-N5 AP.6H1Tea7uRr iKrm 1aRz ADD -1 1650 E"Voll V"" V�� Follr�dc�. Crl MOUNTAIN HAUS D21 V.11. C—Io odo 6165 (Vl0) 416-6947 Fox (1l0) 416-4901 E -Mail fbperoloradonat I PR.O.gGT NO: 9521 REF: ---- April 21, 1998 Michael J. McGee Town of Vail Fire Dept. 42 W. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 816.57 Re: Units 101, 103 and 105 in tli Dear Mr. McGee: This letter will confirm the subs, on April 20, 1998 regarding the Mr. Bradway informed you that Condominium Declarations for will, among other things, allow 103 and 105 (the "Units"), to be no way of knowing how to cord has been decided, Mr. Bradway sprinklers in the Units until afte: You indicated that you understo sprinkling the Units before their reason, you indicated that the Ti the Mountain Haus as long as it However, you indicated your de the Units are sprinkled some tin towards that goal. SCOTT A. JOHNSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 27o5A DAVOs TRAIL VAIL, COLORADO 81657 l OV A;�X 412 Date Received JUN 18 1998 -"� ELEPHONE�(970) 476-2408 TELECOPIER 970) 479-8968 E-mail siohnson®one800.net If the foregoing is not consisten something I have inadvertently left out, please let me know. Very -uly Y t eb Cott Ai4h son, IEsq. cc, Trevor Bradway Charles E. Taylor, Esq. me J the :ed 01, is 311 f rd. it for wing. that Printed by Mike McgeP 6/18/98 11:12am From: Mike Mcgee To: Tom Moorhead Subject: fwd: Treavor Bradway @ Mtn Haus --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====4/20/98=10:28am== I have an appointment with Treavor and his fire sprinkler designer at 2 PM today in my office. I have a couple of questions regarding procedural ethics (ie Should we require Treavor to submit "new" engineered plans or allow him to use information from the previous set). My thought is to allow him to use the flow data (public domain) but the use of the as builts (paid for by the Association) is questionable. I thought I would call the fire protection engineer, the architect and the Association, and if there is no objection, let him use them. If there is an objection, my understanding of the Engineer and Architects statutes is that the plans belong to them and Treavor will need to either secure permission or provide a new set. If I am off base, please let me know. Thanks! Fwd=by:=Tom=Moorhead==4/21/98==4:10pm== Fwd to: Mike Mcgee ....................................... From the discription it sounds as if you are right on the mark. Printed by Mikd McgP� 6/18/98 11:11am -------------------%------------ ---- From: Mike Mcgee To: Tom Moorhead Subject: fwd: Mountain Haus - Treavor Bradway --------------------------------------- ===NOTE===============4/20/98==4:30pm== CC: Dick Duran, Gary Goodell Tom, You can disregard the previous note. Treavor has secured permission from the Assoc. to use the existing plans. He has engaged an architect, John Railton, a fire sprinkler designer, Noreen dba FireTech, and an attorney, Scott Johnson. Treavor met with the Mtn Haus Board last Sunday and received their vote to convert his office to retail. The purpose of his meeting with me was to disclose a "snag" in their plans. The condo declarations apparently need to be amended to convert the space to retail use. The condo dec's were already being revised but passage requires unanimous approval by the membership and any financial interests (holders of a Deed of Trust). Treavor and Scott told me they and the Board agreed to send the amendment(s) out as a package, and upon approval, will be enacted. Their best guess was sometime late summer or fall. Treavor committed to putting the fire sprinklers in his space as soon as the amendments were approved. In the event the amendments are not approved, or not approved by this fall, he stated it was his intent to install the fire sprinklers in his office anyway. He stated it was his intent to avoid having to install the fire sprinklers twice (once in an office configuration and again in a retail configuration. I agreed to not ask Gary Goodell to pull the TCO on May 1st but noted the Fire Dept would not agree to issuing a final CO until the fire sprinklers were installed. Fwd=by:=Tom=Moorhead==4/21/98==4:12pm== Fwd to: Mike Mcgee ....................................... Printed by Mike M'cgi 6/18/98 11:llam As you can see I react these and r.pond one at a time. Thanks Printed by Mike Mca 6/18/98 11:12am From: Mike Mcgee To: Tom Moorhead Subject: fwd: Mountain Haus - Treavor Bradway --------------------------------------- ===NOTE===============4/20/98==4:30pm== CC: Dick Duran, Gary Goodell ....................................... Tom, You can disregard the previous note. Treavor has secured permission from the Assoc. to use the existing plans. He has engaged an architect, John Railton, a fire sprinkler designer, Noreen dba FireTech, and an attorney, Scott Johnson. Treavor met with the Mtn Haus Board last Sunday and received their vote to convert his office to retail. The purpose of his meeting with me was to disclose a "snag" in their plans. The condo declarations apparently need to be amended to convert the space to retail use. The condo dec's were already being revised but passage requires unanimous approval by the membership and any financial interests (holders of a Deed of Trust). Treavor and Scott told me they and the Board agreed to send the amendment(s) out as a package, and upon approval, will be enacted. Their best guess was sometime late summer or fall. Treavor committed to putting the fire sprinklers in his space as soon as the amendments were approved. In the event the amendments are not approved, or not approved by this fall, he stated it was his intent to install the fire sprinklers in his office anyway. He stated it was his intent to avoid having to install the fire sprinklers twice (once in an office configuration and again in a retail configuration. I agreed to not ask Gary Goodell to pull the TCO on May 1st but noted the Fire Dept would not agree to issuing a final CO until the fire sprinklers were installed. Fwd=by:=Gary=Goodell==4/20/98==5:15pm== Fwd to: Mike Mcgee ....................................... Printed by Mike Mcg 6/18/98 11:12am 'Thanks. George Ruth -6r tells me trmt they aren't going with the general contractor they planned to go with because the job was about $50K over budget, & when they asked 'em to sharpen the pencil, the contractor found another $18K for a total of $68K over, so they were talking to Shaw to see if they would do it, &, if they can't get it together, they may not be able to go this year. SCOTT A. JOHNSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 2705A DAVOs TRAIL VAIL, COLORADO 81657 April 21, 1998 Michael J. McGee Town of Vail Fire Dept. 42 W. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Re: Units 101, 103 and 105 in the Mountain Haus Dear Mr. McGee: TELEPHONE 970) 476-2408 TELECOPIER 970) 479-8963 E-mail sjohnson(gone800.net This letter will confirm the substance of the conversation you had with Trevor Bradway and me on April 20, 1998 regarding the referenced subject. Mr. Bradway informed you that the Board of the Mountain Haus is pursuing a plan to amend the Condominium Declarations for the building. If approved, the amendments being contemplated will, among other things, allow three of the units Mr. Bradway owns in the building, Units 101, 103 and 105 (the "Units"), to be converted to retail use. With this in mind and because there is no way of knowing how to correctly sprinkle the Units until their future use and configuration has been decided, Mr. Bradway indicated that he would prefer to postpone the installation of sprinklers in the Units until after he knows whether the conversion to retail can move forward. You indicated that you understood Mr. Bradway's desire to avoid the additional expense of sprinkling the Units before their eventual use and configuration has been decided. For this reason, you indicated that the Town of Vail would not pull the Temporary Occupancy Permit for the Mountain Haus as long as it was satisfied that the effort Mr. Bradway described was ongoing. However, you indicated your desire that this process be completed as quickly as possible so that the Units are sprinkled some time this year. We agreed to keep you apprised of our progress towards that goal. If the foregoing is not consistent with your understanding of our conversation or if there is something I have inadvertently left out, please let me know. Very ally ?sZon, Cn/0 Cott A.hsq. cc. Trevor Bradway Charles E. Taylor, Esq. `% NNW TOWN OF VAILL7V Vail Fire Department 42 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2250 April 24, 1998 Scott A. Johnson Attorney at Law 2705A Danns Trail Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: TCO at Mountain Haus Dear Mr. Johnson; Thank you for the summary letter regarding our meeting with Mr. Bradway on April 20, 1998. I have discussed the issues with Chief Dick Duran, Chief Building Official Gary Goodell, and Building Inspector Charlie Davis. I also discussed the results of our meeting with Stephanie Lord, the Architect for the west entry. The Fire Department has agreed not to ask the Building Department to revoke the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy which is scheduled to expire May 1, 1998. At the request of the architect, we have agreed to extend the TCO until September 15, 1998. The Fire Department's primary concern is that Units 101, 103, and 105 have an approved fire sprinkler system installe(L We do understand the Association's desire to amend the Declarations, the desire to convert certain units from a business office to retail, and the Associations desire to remodel the west entry. We are in support of each goal. If the Association is successful in clanging the Condo Declarations prior to September 15, 1998 or if the fire sprinkler system is installed prior to September IS, 1998, we can upon successful test and inspection of the fire sprinkler system, issue a Certificate of Occupancy. Please keep us advised on the progress and contact us if we may be of assistance. Sincerely, Michael McGee Fire Marshal cc: Chief Duran Gary Goodell, Chief Building Official Charlie Davis, Building Inspector Stephanie Lord, FP&B Hk'It-CJ-ati ac iW as:v.a. a..� ....,• •�•.. -- Post it° F N Fax Cover Sheet Date: April 23, 1998 To: Charlie Davis Fu: 479-2452 Re: Mountain Maus TCO Sender. Stephanie Lord .i — 7671 Date From 6,je,-O(tt.( Phone a 10. A R C H I T E C T S You should receive 2 page(s) iurluding this cover sheet If you not receive a pages, please call (470) 476-6342 Ext_ 15. C;,Whe - As you may recall, the Mountain Hates received a TCO on 1215/97 for completing the installation of the faWsmol:e dampers- The TCO was pending that Units 101!1 103, and 105 spdulde their units. The TCO expires on May 1, 1998 and Units 101, 103, and 1105 will not be sprinkled until a Later date. 1 believe that Sam and Trevor Bradway (owners of touts 101,103, and 105) have been speaking with MlZce McGee and TOV Fire Department rega ,-in8 the iastallattiom of their Sprinkler System. The Mountain Haus is requesting an extensioa of the TCO_ Could you please review and Iet me know if an extension is possible? Thanks. please call with any questions or cormuents. rLWS37-M—tu,�,ps-y/ryTACY,pOTr4a�M1]—VA 217(P Planning 0 ArthitrMre • Utenors 1650 Eva Vail Vadey Dnve Wridge C-1 • VM. CO 81657 • 1p @ bndmnft �(�c W70)47&A901 w (9M) 476.634 ax ote ! r ( co.10W. �k �2c7c Fax k .i — 7671 Date From 6,je,-O(tt.( Phone a 10. A R C H I T E C T S You should receive 2 page(s) iurluding this cover sheet If you not receive a pages, please call (470) 476-6342 Ext_ 15. C;,Whe - As you may recall, the Mountain Hates received a TCO on 1215/97 for completing the installation of the faWsmol:e dampers- The TCO was pending that Units 101!1 103, and 105 spdulde their units. The TCO expires on May 1, 1998 and Units 101, 103, and 1105 will not be sprinkled until a Later date. 1 believe that Sam and Trevor Bradway (owners of touts 101,103, and 105) have been speaking with MlZce McGee and TOV Fire Department rega ,-in8 the iastallattiom of their Sprinkler System. The Mountain Haus is requesting an extensioa of the TCO_ Could you please review and Iet me know if an extension is possible? Thanks. please call with any questions or cormuents. rLWS37-M—tu,�,ps-y/ryTACY,pOTr4a�M1]—VA 217(P Planning 0 ArthitrMre • Utenors 1650 Eva Vail Vadey Dnve Wridge C-1 • VM. CO 81657 • 1p @ bndmnft �(�c W70)47&A901 w (9M) 476.634 TOWN OF V. 42 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2250 April 24, 1998 Stephanie Lord Fritzlen, Pierce Briner 1650 Sunburst Drive, C-1 Vail, Co. 81657 Lon Re: Completion of US Engineering Fire Sprinkler Work at Mountain Haus Dear Stephanie, 9 Vail Fire Department This letter will serve a final approval of the work included under the initial permit issued to US Engineering as it relates to the retroactive installation of the fire sprinkler system. We have received a copy of the stamped plans from BFPE. and have approved the plans as as-builts. We are still anticipating completion of the fire sprinkler system in Units 101, 103, and 105. Upon successful completion of those units, we will sign off on the final certificate of occupancy. Please contact us if you need additional information. Sincerely, Alichael McGee Fire Marshal cc: Chief Duran Gary Goodell, Chief Building Official Perry Mathews, BFPE Gary Montoya, US Engineering V Yo r / .j V. r ♦.a.. .� .. Fax Cover Sheet Date; To: Fax: � "' 7• I' �,{� Re: Sender: A R C H i T E C T 5 You should receive page(s) including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all we pages, please call (970) 476-6342 Ext. [ext]. 440 Planning 0 Architecture 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 • Vail, CO 61657 0 Fpbarch(@vail.net • fax (970) 476-4901 0 (970) 476-6342 4 , MEMORANDUM TO: Mike McGee, TOV Fire Marshall FROM: Stephanie Lord DATE: April 27, 1998 RE: Mountain Haus West Entry Based on our telephone conversation on April 23, 1998, it is my "stage" construction of the West Entry. FPB is proposing to construct the West Entry in (2) phases. Phase I would occur during late May, June and July and would consist primarily of the exterior site work (planter walls, new stairs, etc). Phase Il would occur in fall and included the completion of the attached wood structure/roof and finish interior work. The West Entry is a required means of egress from the building. Therefore, before we pursue this course FPB wanted to be certain that the temporary exiting condition would be acceptable to the TOV Fire Department. As we discussed, exiting may only be possible from the basement level. Currently, the primary exit is from the landing between the fust level and basement levej- Guests would be discharged directly to the exterior, however they would need to ascend the new exterior stairs from the basement level to the Slifer Plaza level. The basement exiting condition is temporary and construction willl be completed before the facility opens for the 1998-1999 ski season. Could you confirm our conversation by faxing back this mento with any additional comments and your signature. Thanks again for all your help. Planning • Architedure 1650 East Vail Vallcy Orive Fallridge C-1 * v,il, Co R16S7 9 fpb@coloradn.net Ilnteriors • fax (970) 476-4901 0 (970) 476-6341 A MEMORANDUM To: Vail Town Council From: Community Development Department Date: April 14, 1998 Re: Mountain Haus Follow-up On Tuesday, February 24, 1998, the representatives for the Mountain Haus Condominium Association appeared before the Vail Town Council with a request to proceed through the public process. The request was in response to the Mountain Haus' desire to construct a new west entry addition on Town of Vail property, adjacent to Slifer Plaza. The Council granted permission to the Mountain Haus with three conditions. The conditions were: 1. That the applicant identify the public benefits to be realized as a result of the new addition on Town property. 2. That the applicant provide a tree preservation plan identifying which trees were to be removed and how the remaining trees were to be protected throughout construction. 3. That the staff recommend to the Council the most appropriate means of conveying the use of Town of Vail property to the Mountain Haus. Below is the applicant's and staff's response to the Council's conditions: Public Benefits: * Increased retail viability of the commercial spaces in the lower level of the Mountain Haus. * Improved aesthetics of the existing building adjacent to Slifer Plaza. * All proposed tree removal mitigation, as required by the PEC, will occur on Town of Vail property, adjacent to the Mountain Haus in Slifer Plaza. * The new west entry will be constructed in conjunction with the Town's improvements to Slifer Plaza. �r J The Mountain Haus will be contributing to the construction of the Slifer Plaza improvements (see attached) . Tree Preservation: The applicant has hired a Consulting Arborist to formulate a tree preservation plan and will oversee various stages of construction to insure that the trees to be preserved are protected (see attached). Property Conveyance: Following discussions with the applicant, and consultation with Tom Moorhead, the staff recommends that the Town execute an easement agreement with the Mountain Haus to cover the improvements on Town of Vail property. W % cision .e , irks P.O. Box 606 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • (970) 845-8375 April 2, 1998 Stephanie Lord Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Architects .1650 E. Vail Vailey Dr. Fallridge C-1 Vail, CO 81657 RE: Tree Preservation Program Mountain Haus New West Entry Vail, CO Dear Stephanie: On Wednesday, March 25, 1998 we met at the Mountain Haus to discuss details of the proposed renovation of the west entry. The following report will summarize our discussions, document my findings from tree inspections, and present recommendations for individually referenced trees. Also attached is a proposal for additional consultation. DEFINITION OF ASSIGNMENT It is the expressed interest of both the Project Architects and the Mountain Haus to save every possible tree on this site by investigating tree relocation opportunities and utilizing approved tree preservation techniques for residual trees. Pursuant to this interest, I was retained by Fritzlen, Pierce, Architects, Inc. to create an initial report. In order to fulfill this assignment within the initial budget, it was agreed the following issues would be addressed. • Identify, measure, and label 12 viable trees adjacent to the Mountain Haus West Entry. • Inspect each of these trees for general health. • Evaluate alternatives of removal or relocation for 5 of these 12 trees. • Provide cost estimate of preferred alternative. • Outline a Tree.Preservation Guidelines for remaining trees adjacent to new construction. • Include proposal for further services. ASSUMPTIONS -AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Field inspections were performed on 3/26/98 and 3/30/98.: Conditions noted pertain to the later date. Inspections were limited to visual examination of accessible features without excavation, coring, or climbing. The scope of this report does not include either determination of tree ages or individual tree valuation appraisals since these figures were not determined to be an essential component of this report. Discussion regarding the L.O.D.( limit of disturbance) for encroachment into the root zone is assuming the 3/9/98 Pricing Set tree locations and new hardscape locations are accurate within %z Due to initial budget restrictions, specific recommendations for replacement trees species, size and location -are included in my proposal for further services. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied that further problems or deficiencies of the trees on this site may not arise in the future. = :•Y•Y•i •.Y•Y.� I Page 2 of 4 ' April 2, 1998 Mountain Haus Project GENERAL CONDITION OF TREES In their present condition, this group of trees has outgrown the original landscape design. What was likely once an attractive landscape of well spaced and vigorous young trees with dense foliage at eye level, is now a crowded group of large root -bound trees. Competition for sunlight, water, nutrients, and root growing space has killed the lower branches of interior trees, suppressed lateral branch growth, and created conditions favorable for.insect and disease attack. Irrespective of the proposed hardscape renovation, my prescription for this group of trees would be a combination of removal, thinning, dead branch pruning, and root feeding to increase vigor of remaining trees. . In addition to 12 viable trees which this report addresses specifically, this site also has 6 small aspen which _ are either dead, or diseased. These 6 small stems are inconsequential and should just be removed. All spruce have a minor degree of Cooley spruce gall adelgid(Adelges cooleyt) evidence, an inconsequential insect indigenous to our region. Varying degrees of aphid damage are also present on all trees. Annual growth of lower branches on all spruce averages 2" to 3" per year, which is below average for spruce trees of this size. TREE SIZE AND CONDITION A total of 12 trees were measured, inspected, and labeled with a numbered tag. For ease of reference, I have also numbered each of these trees on an enclosed copy of the FPB Pricing Set 3/9/98. # SPECIES DIAMETER HEIGHT DRIPU[NE CONDITION I Blue spruce(Picea pungens) bh 37'.. RADFUS 8" Fair 2 Blue spruce 3 . Blue spruce g.5". 40' 8' Fair -poor, aphid evidence and trace of pine needle scale . 4. Blue spruce 110' 9.0" . 47 46' 9' Fair 9' Poor -fair, significant aphid damage 5 Blue spruce 6 Aspen(Populus tremuloides) 9.0" 5.5" 50'. 9' Fair -poor, root Collor is only 4.5' from building 7 Aspen 6 0" 45' 44 7' Poor, overcrowded environment and root bound on one side 'Poor, 8 -.Blue spruce; . f 12 5" 55 T- overcrowded and root bound on two sides 12 S Fau bound 9. Blue spruce 12.5" :56 pbor,,root and Xmas lights constraining cambium I 1 Fair root bound, too close to building .10 -'Blue spruce 10.0" 50 . 9. _ Fair I l Blue spruce 12 Blue spruce `11.0" _ .46' 9' Fair, root bound on two sides 11.5" 47' 9' Fair Footnotes: • Dbh(diameter at a breast height of 4.5') is rounded to the nearest %:'. • Heights were measured with a clinometer to an accuracy greater than 90%. • Dri 1• d' ' p ane ra us is the distance from the trunk to a point on the ground immediately below the outermost branch tip. Page 3 of 4 -.April 2, 1998 Mountain Haus Project REMOVAURELOCATION ALTERNATIVES . Virtually, any size tree(even three foot diameter trees) can be successfully relocated elven that certain criteria are met. The prospect of tree relocation on this project must consider the following issues. a) Inadequate tree health and vigor: Much like being "admitted to surgery", a tree should be in a good.state of health before the expenditure of transplanting should be considered. If a tree does not meet an acceptable level of health and vigor before enduring major root loss from a relocation operation, the expenditure is not justified. Tree 94 falls in this category. b) Structural defects: Large trees with physical/biological defects such as cankers, trunk decay, root decay, or a root bound condition often have compromised structural integrity, particularly when relocated. Trees #6 and 7 fall in this category. c) Digging restrictions: Obtaining an adequate root ball can be impracticable due to close proximity to buildings, hardscapes, or large submerged rocks. Tree #5 falls in this category. d) . Damage to residual trees: The process of digging the root ball of one large tree which is nestled amongst several closely spaced trees can cause irreparable damage to residual trees. Tree #8 falls in this category. e) Budget restraints: Locally available 90" tree spades are capable of moving a root ball up to 85" at a cost range from $400.00 to $700.00 per tree. This size spade is capable of moving up to an 8"Dbh tree comfortably(these size limitations reflect tree biology rather than machine capability restrictions). Trees greater than 8" Dbh can be candidates for relocation by round . balling/boxing. This method starts at approximately $8000.00. The preferred alternative is to remove(saw down) trees #4, #5, #6, 97, and #8. The cost estimate to remove these five trees, leaving only a short stump, is $750.00. TREE PRESERVATION GUIDELINES Every residual tree on this site will inevitably incur some degree of root loss. The objectives are to minimize physical root loss, prevent damage to the residual root zone, maintain tree health and vigor through injection of soil bio -stimulants, and monitor water requirements. The following list provides specific details. • L. 0.D.(7imitofdisturbance): 1. The 3/9/98 Pricing Set shows the new wall edge to be 4.5' from the center of tree #3(equivalent to a distance of 4' from the wall edge'to the root collar). This .is only acceptable if the edge of the wall is the actual L.O.D. Since it is likely that workers. will need at least P of working room beyond the wall edge, I would prefer the wall location be redesigned to accommodate an actual L.O.D. no closer than 4' from the . root -collar. 2. -..d,would-also prefer the wall to the west of tree # 11 be moved 3'. further to the west to mitigate root disturbance. Fencing: Two sections of 5' tall metal of plastic mesh fences should be installed. The first will start at the west edge of tree # 1 and extend along the northwest driplines of trees #2 and #3, and end flush with the building. The second fence will start at the south edge of the water. feature, extend along the southwesfdriplines of trees 911, #10, and 99, and end flush with the building. • Excavation: When removing topsoil, all excavation cuts should be made radially away from the trunk. This procedurepositions the operator directly facing the trunk when the shovel severs roots at the L.O.D. All exposed roots then need to be root pruned. All storage (even temporarily) of excess dirt within tree driplines should be strictly prohibited. Contractor needs to give Consulting Arborist three days advance notice so that he can be to present to monitor digging operation and perform root pruning. �r April 2, 1998 Mountain House Project GLOSSARY-OF TERMS - Bio-stimulants- Organically based nutrients(such as humate' , hormones, vitamins, etc.) which enhance tree health. Cambium- ^ A layer of cells between the inner bark and the wood which are responsible for generating increase in branch, trunk or root girth girth.. Canker- A necrotic lesion with a definite border. The dead and sometimes decayed tissue in the lesion can produce a weak spot, predisposing the tree to-failure. Clinometer- A hand held instrument which relies upon trigonometry to produce a reading of angles or heights. Dbh- Diameter at a breast height of 4.5' above ground. This is a common forestry term which is used for reference to the size of a tree. Dripline radius- The distance from the trunk to a point on the ground immediately below the outermost branch. Hardscape- A manmade structure such as a wall, sidewalk, etc. Root ball- A containment of roots and surrounding soil. Round balling/boxing- Methods used to secure and stabilize the root ball for transit in tree transplanting operations. Although this method can be used on any size tree, in this region it is usually reserved for trees which are inaccessible to a mechanical tree spade or biologically require a larges root ball than the machine• is capable. . Root bound- A situation which exists when roots have insufficient soil in which to radiate in a natural pattern. The point at-which the trunk flares to become to start a root. ` . Root zone An expansive. area of soil in which roots from a single tree can be found. Tree spade- A hydraulic machine with' banana peel" type shovels which lift the tree and root ball as one unit. Viable- Significant. Capable. of living and providing a positive contribution to the landscape. MEMORANDUM I� 0 1�-1G TO: Planning and Environmental Commission �" �I FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 13, 1998 SUBJECT: A request for a setback variance and a site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus, located at 292 East M Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1st. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association, represented by Stephanie Lord of Fritzlen, Pierce & Briner. Planner: George Ruther DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, the Mountain Haus Condominium Association, represented by Stephanie Lord of Fritzlen, Pierce, and Briner, is requesting a setback variance and site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus. The remodeled west entry is intended to improve access into the residential and commercial spaces within the Mountain Haus, as well as enhance the aesthetics of the west elevation of the building. The new entry will replace an existing canvas awning. The remodel will result in the removal of three large evergreen trees and two aspen trees. To mitigate the loss of the trees, the applicant has agreed to replace the trees at a foot:foot or caliper:caliper ratio, depending upon the type of tree, in the vicinity of the Mountain Haus. A copy of the tree preservation report has been attached for reference. Much of the new entry addition is proposed to be constructed on Town of Vail property within Slifer Plaza. If approved, the applicant will be required to execute a easement agreement with the Town of Vail. According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the Mountain Haus is located in the Public Accommodation Zone District. Pursuant to Sections 12-7A-6 and 12-7A-9 of the Municipal Code, the minimum side setback shall be 20 feet and the site coverage shall not exceed 55% of the total site area. The existing west side setback, in the location of the new entry addition, is one foot and the existing site coverage of the Mountain Haus is approximately 76%. The new entry addition is proposed to extend out from the building 22 1/2 feet and add approximately 320 of additional site coverage. Therefore, the proposed improvements will result in a new west side setback of zero feet and the site coverage percentage will be increased to 77%. Since the minimum side setback for the Mountain Haus is 20 feet and the maximum site coverage is 55%, and the applicant is proposing to increase to existing non -conformity, a side setback variance of one foot and a site coverage variance of 1% are required. A copy of the plans and a letter of explanation from the applicant has been attached for reference. f: \everyone\pec\memos\mthaus. 413 1 A ]b{9NOFV,tIL H. BACKGROUND On Tuesday, Febka)r '24, 1998, the applicant's representative met with the Town Council. The purpose of the meeting with the Town Council was to seek the Town Council's permission to proceed through the public planning process. The Town Council's permission is required, as the Mountain pus is p' osing to construct the new entry on a portion of Town of Vail property within Slifer Plaza. Upon hearing the applicant's request, the Town Council granted its permission to proceed through the planning process. The Council identified the following three issues which need to be addressed during the review process: A public benefit of allowing the applicant to use a portion of the Town property to construct the new entry. 2. A tree preservation plan. 3. If approved, the property conveyance options for allowing the applicant to use Town property. On Monday, March 23, 1998, the applicant's representative met with the Planning and Environmental Commission for a worksession to discuss the proposed west entry remodel. The purpose of the worksession was to discuss the following issues: • The appropriateness of constructing an entry addition on Town -owned property zoned Outdoor Recreation District. • The requirement of a tree preservation plan and tree removal associated with the new entry. • The public benefit gained by allowing the new entry to be constructed on Town property. • The completeness of the application. During the worksession, the Planning and Environmental Commission and the applicant's representative agreed to a tree preservation plan. A copy of the draft minutes from the March 23 meeting have been attached for reference. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 12-17-6, Variance Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback and site coverage variances. The recommendation for approval is based on the following factors: f: \everyone\pecVnemos\mthaus. 413 2 A. Consideration of Factors: The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. Staff believes that the requested setback and site coverage variance will have minimal, if any, negative impacts on the other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity of the Mountain Haus. The new entry was designed in conjunction with the Town's proposed improvements to Slifer Plaza. The location of the improvements will not hinder pedestrian circulation in Slifer Plaza. Pedestrian safety may actually be enhanced as the new entry will improve the access to the Mountain Haus and the covered stairs will prevent the build up of ice and snow. As mentioned previously, if approved, the applicant will be required to execute a easement agreement with the Town of Vail. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. Staff believes the applicant has requested the minimum amount of relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of the setback and site coverage regulations necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity among sites in the vicinity of the Mountain Haus and within the Public Accommodation Zone District. The proposed entry will only encroach one foot further into the setback than the building currently encroaches in the location of the entrance. Other areas of the building on the west side encroach further into the setback, and in fact, some areas are off the applicant's property and onto Town of Vail property. In terms of additional site coverage, the new addition, while more permanent and substantial nature, results in a slight increase in site coverage. Staff believes the additional site coverage is warranted and will not result in a special privilege as the Mountain Haus was constructed prior to zoning. The relationship of the existing structure to the current development standards prohibit the applicant from ever constructing improvements to the building without a variance. Staff believes this to be an extraordinary circumstance or exceptional condition. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The proposed variances will have little, if any, effect on these factors. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. f:leveryone\peclmemos\mthaus.413 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict and literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback and site coverage variances. Staff's recommendation of approval is based upon the review of the Criteria and Factors outlined in Section III of this memorandum. Should the Planning and Environmental choose to grant an approval of the applicant's request, staff would recommend the Planning and Environmental Commission make the following findings: That the granting of the setback and site coverage variances do not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the setback and site coverage limitations on other properties in the Public Accommodation Zone District. 2. That the granting of the setback and site coverage variances will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Mountain Haus. 3. That the setback and site coverage variances are warranted since the strict interpretation or enforcement of the setback and site coverage regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Public Accommodation Zone District, as the Mountain Haus is an existing building constructed prior to Town's adoption of zoning regulations. f:\everyone\pec\memos\mthaus.413 4 c� o March 24, 1998 MOUNTAIN HAUS NEW WEST ENTRANCE Site Coverage and Set Back Variance PROPERTY: 292 E. Meadow Drive Lot 5 Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1St Filing ZONING: Public Accommodation District DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST A R C H I T E C T S On the behalf of the Mountain Haus Condominium Association we are requesting to construct a new west entry adjacent to Slifer Plaza. There is currently a canvas canopy in this location. The footprint of the new entry structure, primarily stone and wood, would mimic the existing canopy footprint. The proposed West Entry extends out 20' from the west face of the existing building and is 12'-0" wide. The structure would cover a new stair leading down to the commercial basement level. Additionally, an on -grade walkway is proposed on the south side of the new structure which would lead to the Mountain Haus Residential Units (see attached plans) COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES/ HARMONY MAINTAINED The new entry structure was designed in conjunction with the TOV redesign of Slifer Plaza. The architecture mimics the covered bridge and bus stop structures of wood timbers and gable roof pitches. Additionally, the landscaping design carries through the new features in Slifer Plaza with matching stone planter walls, flower beds, and paving. There are several adjacent covered walkways which serve the same functions as the proposed Mountain Haus West Entrance. EFFECT OF THE VARIANCE The distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, and utilities are not impacted. The public safety is improved by providing clearer direction, lighting, and snowmelt into the facility. The new entrance is an "open-air" structure and should not have any impact on the light and air. The landscape plan will allow more light into Slifer Plaza. COMPLIANCE WITH VAIL's COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Goal 1.2 - Upgrading buildings - Encourage the continued upgrading and enhancement of existing lodging and commercial facilities The Mountain Haus West Entry improves the aesthetic of the Mountain Haus by adding visual interest, detail, a variety of wood stone and metal materials, and adding human scale to the West Facade. Goal 1.3 - Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements KA9527 Mountain Haus\9527C\PEC-TOVApprovals\wpd\grO325.wpd Planning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 • Vail, CO 81657 • fpb@colorado.net • fax (970) 476-4901 • (970) 476-6342 done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town. The Town of Vail contacted the Mountain Haus regarding the renovation of Slifer Plaza. The design of the Mountain Haus West Entry has occurred in conjunction with the Slifer Plaza design and is intended to further enhance the edges of the Slifer Plaza. The materials, landscape and footprint all complement and support goals for Slifer Plaza. Goal 2.5 - Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests The Mountain Haus has been working on their long term goals to improve quest comfort and safety at the Mountain Haus. Past projects include the installation of a sprinkler system and renovation of interior common areas. The proposed Entry to the upper residential units and to the lower commercial areas is another step in improving the facilities. The new entry encourage the public to the enter the lower corridor to the restaurant and provides the Mtn Haus quest with an separate elegant entry to their units. Goal 3.1- Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. The design of the New West Entry is intended to bring down the scale of the Mountain Haus and improve the pedestrian experience for both people entering the facility and those viewing the facility from Slifer Plaza and the Covered Bridge. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES/PHYSICAL HARDSHIP RELIEF FROM STRICT AND LITERAL INTERPRETATION The facility was constructed almost 30 years ago when the current codes and zoning requirements were not applicable. The building should be maintained and upgraded to meet current guest standards and to complement the Slifer Plaza Redevelopmerit. Due to the existing non -conforming conditions and the design of the building it is difficult to minimize the appearance of height and mass without attaching additional scaled-down elements and building up to and extending out over the property line. The Mountain Haus has a public restaurant located in the facility that is extremely difficult to promote due to its location inside the building, restricted visibility of the existing entry, and the surrounding trees that screen the building. Per the PEC, keeping viable Restaurant space functioning in Vail is a TOV Goal. The new entry will help promote a difficult restaurant location. Adjacent sites have pursued "tear down/rebuilds" because the existing conditions did not provide opportunity to improve without extensive variances. The Mountain Haus is structurally sound and a "tear down/rebuild" would not be fiscally wise. However, improving function and aesthetic to bring the facility into the next decade is still a goal. Due to the existing conditions, any renovation/improvement that the Mountain Haus proposes will be on TOV land. This provides the TOV with an opportunity to encourage development that meets TOV objectives and needs. KA9527 Mountain Haus\9527C\PEC-TOVApprovals\wpd\grO325.wpd `r MOUNTAIN HAUS NEW WEST ENTRANCE Site Coverage and Set Back Variance PROPERTY: 292 E. Meadow Drive Lot 5 Part of Tract B, Vail Village Pt Filing ZONING: Public Accommodation District SITE COVERAGE VARIANCE 12-7A-9 and 18.22.110 Non -Conforming Existing Condition Required: Shall not exceed 55% of total site area Existing: 17,909.20 sq ft - 82.8% Proposed Addition: 13 sq ft - 82.9% SET BACK VARIANCE -12-7A-6 and 18.22.060 Non -Conforming Existing Condition Required: Minimum front, side, and rear setback shall be twenty feet Existing: Zero (West Elevation ranges from 0' to 3' off the property line) Proposed: Infill F of Property Line with new West Entrance which extends out 20' from the face of the building on to TOV owned land KA9527 Mountain Haus\9527C\PEC-TOVApprovals\wpd\grO325.wpd H @i� .4-V V Mountain Haus 8t In -m M PW BUNMrTTAL - TA9BT BaRAMM M L MEADOW COM Z X rN J MOM X Mz H @i� if I cif .4-V V Mountain Haus PW BUNMrTTAL - TA9BT BaRAMM M L MEADOW COM J J VAL. OMMRADO INN Al' if I cif Mountain Haus PW BUNMrTTAL - TA9BT BaRAMM M L MEADOW COM J VAL. OMMRADO INN Mountain Haus PW BUNMrTTAL - TA9BT BaRAMM M L MEADOW COM VAL. OMMRADO INN N u rn 0 0 I Q)0 oEtoa � � r ♦ 6 Lt� � � � � ��{T I I I ■ Mountain Haus Z X N rc a WAMAL - TMW .f,twa s VAL. COLCRADO SOW m XmZ u NW W a 3 Mountain Haus _ m 9 Z 70 N wo waurrK # Ie 7o m Z 1�rz- 0 JAI N jig 70 m 3 °, Mountain Haus r • Z X N .ec n.rrTK - rsr ENTNA)CE m E VEAOW oFWv[ V 7o rn Z VAL.ooLonAco .rr c j8 : �-�T N 1�f = '° m p #f « Z 7o fV 0o i ffrj r, m (i m xmZ . Q Mountain Haus TEC R,YTTAL • WEST EWWACE V"- =OK^DO ren a �ji D T 7O m w , ZXN —+ n mm M xmZ a 1 I I !t Mountain Haus X57 GG� .Eo o. "AL - wm r EifT Wsm 1Y E MEAD M ORVE t V"L CCLOIUOO M jt{ m-nT m o s' Z �a n T n T 7v m Z �. °, Mountain Haus T MC NJ& -W" L - MOT BRMMM Lit E WADOM OFM VAJ- COLOMA00 �) ecisi arks April 3, 1998 Stephanie Lord Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Architects 1650 E. Vail Valley Dr. Fallridge C-1 Vail, CO 81657 TO: Stephanie Lord FROM: Mark Stelle, Consulting Arborist RE: Proposal for further services Mountain Haus New West Entry, Vail, CO My report of April 2, 1998 concerns myinitial site visits and outlines tree preservation issues. Per your request I am submitting a proposal for further services which includes a Plan of Action and projected costs. PLAN OF ACTION 1. Review, as necessary, any subsequent changes to the 3/9/98 Pricing Set. As required, prepare and attend Design Review Board meeting. 2. Recommend replacement tree species, sizes, location, etc. Consulting services would be limited to inspecting nursery stock before it is transported to the site and monitoring onsite installation. 3. Perform removal(cut down, remove and leave only a short stump) all 5 large trees. Set cost of $750.00 4. Root feed all 7 residual trees with bio -stimulant soil injection. 0 application in April and 2nd application in fall'98. The combined cost of both applications is set at $580.00 5.° Assist Construction Project Manager in location of tree preservation fence. 6. Monitor construction activities. 5. site visits anticipated. Coordinating the first construction visit with the time.of initial ground breaking is critical. 7. Supplemental watering; temporarily protecting exposed roots with a covering, and design of a . root aeration systems will all be evaluated as needed. 8. Following construction completion I propose: a) pruning dead branches in the lower ten feet of all 7 trees. b) training(repositioning with straps and small gauge wire) branches to help fill the voids created on residual trees which were caused:by the removal .of close neighboring trees. The combined cost is set at $650.00 Items #3; #4, and #8 are fixed, tree service costs totaling ............................................. $1,980.00 Remaining items concern Consulting Arborist services estimated for 33 hours at $75.00/hr...... $2,475.00 . The following parties agree to the above proposal so long as total cost(inclusive of initial report of April 2, 1998) does not exceed $5,000.00. For Mountain Haus Condominium Association (Please sign above and print name and title below) 4; 01% Asnci+led�l�ndsape fudr +..s of Cobndo n April 2, 1998 %W J Stephanie Lord Fritzlen, Pierce, Briner Architects .1650 E. Vail Vailey Dr. Fallridge C-1 Vail, CO 81657 RE: Tree Preservation Program Mountain Haus New West Entry Vail, CO Dear Stephanie: P.O. Box 606 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • (970) 845-8375 On Wednesday, March 25, 1998 we met at the Mountain Haus to discuss details of the proposed renovation of the west entry. The following report will summarize our discussions, document my findings from tree inspections, and present recommendations for individually referenced trees. Also attached is a proposal for additional consultation. DEFINITION OF ASSIGNMENT It is the expressed interest of both the Project Architects and the Mountain Haus to save every possible tree on this site by investigating tree relocation opportunities and utilizing approved tree preservation techniques for residual trees. Pursuant to this interest, I was retained by Fritzlen, Pierce, Architects, Inc. to create an initial report. In order to fulfill this assignment within the initial budget, it was agreed the following issues would be addressed. • Identify, measure, and label 12 viable trees adjacent to the Mountain Haus West Entry. • Inspect each of these trees for general health. • _ Evaluate alternatives of removal or relocation for 5 of these 12 trees. •. Provide cost estimate of preferred alternative. • Outline a-Tree.Preservation Guidelines for remaining trees adjacent to new construction. • Include proposal for further services. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Field inspections were performed on 3/26/98 and .3/30%98.:Conditions noted pertain to the later date. Inspections were limited to visual examination of accessible features without excavation, coring, or climbing. The.scope of this report does not include either determination of tree ages or individual tree valuation appraisals since these figures were not determined to be an essential component of this report. Discussion regarding the L.O.D.( lifnit of disturbance) for encroachment into the root zone is assuming the 3/9/98 Pricing Set tree locations and new hardscape locations are accurate within '/ `. Due to initial budget restrictions, specific recommendations for replacement trees species, size and location . are included in my proposal for further services. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied that further problems or deficiencies of the trees on this site may not arise in the future. _ :•Y�Y•i c:.o-yd.w. d Cdond Page 2 of 4 April 2, 1998 Mountain Haus Project GENERAL CONDITION OF TREES In their present condition, this group of trees has outgrown the original landscape design. What was likely once an attractive landscape of well spaced and vigorous,young trees with dense foliage at eye level, is now a crowded group of large root -bound trees. . Competition for sunlight, water, nutrients, and root growing space has killed the lower branches of interior trees," suppressed lateral branch growth, and created conditions favorable for insect and disease attack. Irrespective of the proposed hardscape renovation, my prescription for this group of trees would be a combination of removal, thinning, dead branch pruning, and root feeding to increase vigor of remaining trees. In addition to 12 viable trees which this report addresses specifically, this site also has 6 small aspen which . are either dead, or diseased. These 6 small stems are inconsequential and should just be removed. All spruce have. a minor degree of Cooley spruce gall adelgid(Adelges cooleyi) evidence, an inconsequential insect indigenous to our region. Varying degrees of aphid damage are also present on all trees. Annual growth of lower branches on all spruce averages 2" to 3" per year, which is below average for spruce trees of this size. TREE SIZE AND CONDITION A total of 12 trees were measured, inspected, and labeled with a numbered tag. For ease of reference, I have also numbered each of these trees on an enclosed copy of the FPB Pricing Set 3/9/98. SPECIES DIAMETER HEIGHT DRIPLINE CONDITION (Dbh) RADIUS 1 Blue spruce(Pi_cea pungens) 10.5'_ 37' 8', Fair 2: Blue spruce 8.5" 40' 8' Fair -poor, aphid evidence and trace of pine needle scale 3 Blue spruce 11.0" _ 47' 9' Fair -4. Blue spruce 9.0" - 46' 9' Poor -fair, significant aphid damage i Blue spruce 9.0" 50', 9' Fair -poor, root collar is only 4.5' from building 6 Aspen(Populus tremuloides) 5.5" 45' 7' Poor, overcrowded environment and root bound on one side _ 7 ' Aspen 6.0" 44' 7'., -Poor, overcrowded and root bound on two sides 8 sBluespruce12 5 55' - 12' Fair -poor, root bound and Xmas lights "constraining cambium 9 :,:Blue spni;e 12 5 56' rr Fair, root bound, too close to building _ 10 Blue spruce 10.0 50' 9' Fair 11 %Blue spruce " 11.0" : 46' 9' Fair, root bound on two sides 12 Blue spruce 11.5" 47' 9' Fair Footnotes: • Dbh(diameter at a breast height of 4.5') is rounded to the nearest W. • Heights were measured with a clinometer to an accuracy greater than 90%. • Dripline radius is the distance from the trunk to a point on the ground immediately below the outermost branch tip. Page 3 of 4 April 2, 1998 Mountain Haus Project REMOVAL/RELOCATION ALTERNATIVES. Virtually, any size tree(even three foot diameter trees) can be successfully relocated given that certain criteria are met. The prospect of tree relocation on this project must consider the following issues. a) Inadequate tree health and vigor: Much like being "admitted to surgery", a tree should be in a goods' tate of health before the expenditure of transplanting should be considered. If a tree does not meet an acceptable level of health and vigor before enduring major root loss from a relocation operation, the expenditure.is not justified. Tree #4 falls in this category. b) Structural defects: Large trees with physical/biological defects such as cankers, trunk decay, root decay, or a root bound condition often have compromised structural integrity, particularly when relocated. Trees #6 and 7 fall in this category. c) Digging restrictions: Obtaining an adequate root ball can be impracticable due to close proximity to buildings, hardscapes, or large submerged rocks. Tree #5 falls in this category. d) . Damage to residual trees: The process of digging the root ball of one large tree which is nestled amongst several closely spaced trees can cause irreparable damage to residual trees. Tree #8 falls in this category. e) Budget restraints: Locally available 90" tree spades are capable of moving a root ball up to 85" at a cost range from $400.00 to $700.00 per tree. This size spade is capable of moving up to an 8"Dbh tree comfortably(these size limitations reflect tree biology rather than machine capability restrictions). Trees greater than 8" Dbh can be candidates for relocation by round . balling/boxing. This method starts at approximately $8000.00. The preferred alternative is to remove(saw down) trees #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8. The cost estimate to remove these five trees, leaving only a short stump, is $750.00. TREE PRESERVATION GUIDELINES Every residual tree on this site will inevitably incur some degree of root loss. The objectives are to minimize physical root loss, prevent damage to the residual root zone, maintain tree health and vigor through injection of soil bio -stimulants, and monitor water requirements. The following list provides specific details. • L. O. D. Mmit of disturbance): I . _ The 3/9/98 Pricing Set shows the new wall edge to be 4.5' from the center of tree 0(equivalent to a distance of 4' from the wall edge'to the root collar). This .is only acceptable if the edge of the wall is the actual L.O.D. Since it is likely that workers will need at least V of working room beyond the wall edge, I would prefer the wall location be redesigned to accommodate an actual L.O.D. no closer than 4' from the -root-collar. 2. ,I;woul&also prefer the wall to the west of tree # I I ;be moved 3' - further "to the west to mitigate root disturbance: • Fencing Two sections of 5' tall metal of plastic mesh fences should be installed. The first will start at the west edge of tree # 1 and extend along the northwest driplines of trees #2 and #3, and end flush with the building. The second fence will start at the south edge of the water _ feature, extend along the southwest driplines of trees #11, #10, and #9, and end flush with the building. • Excavation: When removing topsoil, all excavation cuts should be made radially away from the trunk. This procedure positions the operator directly facing the trunk when the shovel severs roots at the L.O.D. All exposed roots then need to be root pruned. All storage (even temporarily) of excess dirt within tree driplines should be strictly prohibited. Contractor needs to give Consulting Arborist three days advance notice so that he can be to present to monitor digging operation and perform root pruning. April 2, 1998 Mountain House Project Bio -stimulants - Organically based nutrients(such as humates, hormones, vitamins, etc.) which enhance tree health. Cambium - A layer of cells between the inner bark and the wood which are responsible for generating increase in branch, trunk or root girth girth.. Canker - A necrotic lesion with a definite border. The dead and sometimes decayed tissue in the lesion can produce a weak spot, predisposing the tree to.failure. Clinometer - A hand held instrument which relies upon trigonometry to produce a reading of angles or heights. Dbh- Diameter at a breast height of 4.5' above ground. This is a common forestry term which is used for reference to the size of a tree. Dripline radius - The distance from the trunk to a point on the ground immediately below the outermost branch. Hardscape- A manmade structure such as a wall, sidewalk, etc. Root ball - A containment of roots and surrounding soil. Round balling/boxing- Methods used to secure and stabilize the root ball for transit in tree transplanting operations. Although this method can be used on any size tree, in this region it is usually reserved for trees which are inaccessible to a mechanical tree spade or biologically require a larger root ball than the machine is capable. Root bound- A situation which exists when roots have insufficient soil in which to radiate in a natural pattern. Root co_ liar The point at which the trunk flares to become to start a root. Root zone- . An expansive area of soil in which roots from a single tree can be found. Tree spade - A hydraulic machine with " banana peel" type shovels which lift the tree and root ball as one unit. Viable Significant. Capable of living and providing a positive contribution to the landscape. P.OA606 V4 CO 81658•_-_-- (970)845-M75 C \II .� v. 10 MTN HAMS TO REMOVE (1) SfWUGE .i1• Of i ° ° MOUNTAIN HAUS i�,_ (� 4 O 13 PROPERTY LINE i 1 G' - �1 MTN HAUS TO REMO\/E (2) ASPEN TREE5 (2) SPRUCE TRESS -= ....... 'A Page 4 of 4 April 2, 1998 Mountain Haus Project SUMMARY Removal(saw down) is the preferred alternative for 5 of the 12 trees addressed in this report. Details of tree sizes, condition, and rational are detailed in the text. Also in the text_ are guidelines for preserving the residual trees on this site. I look forward to a continuation of this initial assignment. Should you have any questions about this report, don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, Mark Stelle, Certified Arborist Enclosures: Glossary of Terms Amended 3/9/98 Pricing Set Proposal for further services 8. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus, located at 292 East Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 st. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association Planner: George Ruther PIN George Ruther gave an overview of the staff memo. Ll `- it Greg Moffet asked for any applicant input. Stephanie Lord, representing the applicant, said the west entry solution was being worked out in conjunction with.the Town's redevelopment of Slifer Plaza. Greg Moffet asked for any public input. There was none. John Schofield said the Town Council would see this. Greg Amsden had no comments. Galen Aasland stated that this was a long-standing problem, but if someone built a building next to this we could not approve the same request. Diane Golden had no additional comments Greg Moffet agreed with Galen. John Schofield asked if Todd Oppenheimer had anything to do with the tree preservation plan. Greg Barrie, a landscape architect with the Town of Vail, said he had been working with the Mountain Haus and was trying to put together a comprehensive design with the Slifer Plaza Master Plan and said that the Mountain Haus improvements complimented the master plan. Stephanie Lord said they wanted to save the north tree, but in reality can't, but would put in some ornamental trees, such as crabapple, to bring some human scale into the entry way. Diane Golden asked if they really thought out the crabapple tree idea, as it might be a mess with the children playing in the fountain. Galen Aasland agreed with Diane Golden. Stephanie Lord said they could use another kind of ornamental tree. John Schofield said that Clark Brittain, from the DRB, disagreed with the loss of the 3 large trees. Greg Amsden had no additional comments. George Ruther said the applicant should have a foot -to -foot mitigation plan. Greg Amsden stated they didn't have the ground to do that. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes March 23, 1998 O Lynn Fritzlen stated the applicant wanted to work in conjunction with the Town. George Ruther said there was no way to plant trees on the Mountain Haus property, but other opportunities existed. Galen Aasland said the 3 large aspens taken out needed a foot per foot equitable arrangement . Greg Moffet said he wanted a mitigation plan and hated to see large evergreen trees taken out, as it was too urbanizing. He stated he wanted to see the location of the mitigation as prominent as it was now. Greg Barrie said the Town was starting construction on the plaza in early May. Lynn Fritzlen stated they needed to get going in early May, but we need to finalize our plan when the Town finalizes their plan. Galen Aasland said we needed a commitment from you as to what was being removed. George Ruther said it was important to the Town Council to understand what the benefits to the Town would be, since the entry was on Town of Vail property. He said we would put together an easement agreement. Lynn Fritzlen said the benefit would be to enhance the restaurant downstairs which would be separated from the main hotel. She said the new improvements would solve some mechanical problems they had and would cut down on odors. Greg Moffet suggested it would be a good space for outdoor dining. Lynn Fritzlen said we had originally thought of a sunken plaza, but the noise might be a factor. She said a benefit to the Town would be that the security problems with the open door to the hotel from the past would no longer be a problem and therefore, the police would be there less. Greg Amsden said we needed to preserve the restaurant space we already have in this Town. Greg Moffet was in agreement with Greg Amsden. George Ruther stated that the applicant would need a site coverage variance and setback variance and would like to do a PEC straw poll on the proposed mitigation and design. The PEC was in favor of this request by a straw poll of 5-0. 9. A request for additional GRFA utilizing the 250 ordinance, to allow for a remodel, located at 1998 Sunburst Drive/Lot 19, Vail Valley 3rd Filing. Applicant: Nate Accardo, represented by Dale Smith, Fritzlen, Pierce Briner Architects Planner: George Ruther WITHDRAWN Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes March 23, 1998 13 r MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 1998 SUBJECT: A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus, located at 292 East Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 St. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association, represented by Stephanie Lord of Fritzlen, Pierce & Briner. Planner: George Ruther DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, the Mountain Haus Condominium Association, represented by Stephanie Lord of Fritzlen, Pierce, and Briner, is requesting a worksession with the Planning and Environmental Commission to discuss a proposed west entry remodel to the Mountain Haus. The remodeled west entry is intended to improve access into the residential and commercial spaces within the Mountain Haus, as well as enhance the aesthetics of the west elevation of the building. Much of the new entry addition is proposed to be constructed on Town of Vail property within Slifer Plaza. The new addition is proposed to extend out to the west, the approximate distance that the existing canvas canopy currently extends. The purpose of the worksession is to discuss the following issues: • The appropriateness of constructing an entry addition on Town -owned property zoned Outdoor Recreation District. • The requirement of a tree preservation plan and tree removal associated with the new entry. • The public benefit gained by allowing the new entry to be constructed on Town property. • The completeness of the application. BACKGROUND On Tuesday, February 24th, the applicant's representative met with the Town Council. The purpose of the meeting with the Town Council was to seek the Town Council's permission to proceed through the public planning process. The Town Council's permission is required, as the f:\everyonelpec\rnemosUnthaus.323 t TOWN OF Mountain Haus is proposing to construct the new entry on a portion of Town of Vail property within Slifer Plaza. Upon hearing the applicant's request, the Town Council granted their permission to proceed through the planning process. The Council identified the following three issues which need to be addressed during the review process: A public benefit of allowing the applicant to use a portion of the Town property to construct the new entry. 2. A tree preservation plan. 3. If approved, the property conveyance options for allowing the applicant to use Town property. 111. DISCUSSION ISSUES The Community Development Department has completed a preliminary review of the proposed west entry remodel. Upon completion of our review, staff has identified several issues we believe the applicant, staff and Planning and Environmental Commission should address prior to a final review. Staff has identified the following issues for discussion: The appropriateness of constructing an entry addition on property zoned Outdoor Recreation. According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the Mountain Haus' property is zoned Public Accommodation, and the area immediately adjacent (Slifer Plaza) is zoned Outdoor Recreation. Only a very small portion of the proposed west entry remodel is on the Mountain Haus' property. Most of the entry will be constructed on Town of Vail property in Slifer Plaza. According to Section 12-813-1 of the Municipal Code, the purpose of the Outdoor Recreation Zone District is, "to preserve undeveloped or open space lands from intensive development while permitting outdoor recreational activities that provide opportunities for active and passive recreation areas, facilities and uses." In keeping with the purpose of the Outdoor Recreation Zone District, the permitted, conditional and accessory uses in the zone district are limited to recreational -types of uses (i.e., bicycle paths, pedestrian walkways, nature walks, public parks, ski lifts, etc.). Accessory buildings, both temporary and permanent, customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional outdoor recreation uses, and necessary for the operation thereof, are allowed. Examples of allowable accessory buildings include restrooms, bleachers, and storage buildings. Staff believes the proposed improvements are in compliance with the Outdoor Recreation Zone District. The proposed improvements are pedestrian walkways intended to provide access from the Mountain Haus to Slifer Plaza and the surrounding area. Improved f: \everyone\pecVnemos\mthaus.323 2 pedestrian walkways have been constructed in the Outdoor Recreation and Natural Area Preservation Zone Districts in other areas of Town. These areas include the Covered Bridge, the steps leading down to the pocket park adjacent to the Covered Bridge Building and the steps and walkways constructed as part of the Vail Village Club. Staff would recommend that the Planning and Environmental Commission again affirm the staff's interpretation allowing pedestrian walkways to be constructed in the Outdoor Recreation Zone District. The requirement of a tree preservation plan and tree removal associated with the new entry. I I During the Town Council's initial review of the applicant's request to proceed through the public planning process, the Town Council identified the preservation of the existing trees as a major concern. At the time, the applicant anticipated that approximately 2-3 of the h� existing, large evergreen trees would need to be removed as a result of the proposed Air. ° new entry improvements. The applicant indicated that their design was sensitive to the -X existing vegetation, and therefore, resulted in the minimum amount of tree removal. The .n -AE staff would suggest that the applicant and the Planning and Environmental Commission ��0L'u�r discuss the proposed tree removal, as well as identify minimum requirements for a tree �'Oc'1°'� preservation plan. Staff would suggest that the tree preservation plan be developed in cooperation with a licensed arborist. The public benefit gained by allowing the new entry to be constructed on Town property. A second issue raised by the Town Council during their initial review of the applicant's request to proceed through the public planning process was the public benefits to be gained by the Town of Vail for allowing the Mountain Haus to construct a portion of their access on Town property. It was believed by the Town Council, that in order to permit the applicant to use Town property, a public benefit must be realized. Staff has identified the following potential public benefits.- All enefits: All tree removal will be mitigated with additional tree planting by the applicant. The proposed entry will be constructed in conjunction with the Slifer Plaza improvements. The improved entry will enhance the viability of the lower level commercial spaces. TeornorE • The proposed entry will aesthethically improve the appearance of the existing building. Staff would suggest that the applicant address and discuss the potential public benefits to be realized to the Town of Vail for allowing the Mountain Haus to construct their improvements on Town of Vail property. The completeness of the application. At this time, the applicant's submittal is incomplete. To complete the application, the applicant needs to submit the following information relevant to a setback variance and a site coverage variance: f: \everyone\pec\memos\mthaus. 323 a. A fee of $250 must be paid at the time of submittal. b. Stamped, addressed envelopes and a list of names and mailing addresses of all property owners adjacent to the subject property, including properties behind and across streets. The applicant is responsible for correct names and mailing addresses. This information is available from the Eagle County Assessor's Office. C. A written statement and precise nature of the variances requested and the specific regulations involved. d. A written statement addressing the following: - The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. - The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to obtain the objectives of the Zoning Code without a granting of special privilege. - The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities and public safety. - How the request complies with Vail's Comprehensive Plan. e. A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least 1" = 20' stamped by a Colorado licensed surveyor, including locations of all existing improvements, including grades and elevations. Other elements which must be shown are parking and loading areas, ingress and egress, landscape areas and utility and drainage features. f. A site plan at a scale of at least 1" = 20' showing existing and proposed buildings. g. Building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed. h. A tree preservation plan. i. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Community Development Department and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission, in order to complete the review of the proposed request. Is there any additional information that the Planning and Environmental Commission wishes to request of the applicant, prior to acting upon the site coverage and setback variance requests? IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION f: �everyone\pec\memos\mthaus. 323 4 As this is only a worksession and not a final review, The Community Development Department will not be making a recommendation at this time. The Community Development Department will provide a recommendation to the Planning and Environmental Commission at the time of final review. A final review of the applicant's request is tentatively scheduled for Monday, April 13, 1998. f: \everyone\pec\memos\mthaus.323 �lm •••'��•��6 OOOOOOOi� q � 1 Mountain Haus w. c �woow owrE 1 rti carn�oo rs.r ' i I Its w -a T 70 Z 70 m D / ZXN O ' TC7m p j 7o T Z •••'��•��6 OOOOOOOi� q � 1 Mountain Haus w. c �woow owrE 1 rti carn�oo rs.r ' i I C X \ z 4 / N rn z 4 4 a,.. P Z f a c '° m'_°, °, Mountain Haus ° m n m M. c HKAOM cmw 70 m Z r". onDPL%W ern C3 N D U M N_ Q. z • �dmli Mountain Haus ....,.L - W%ffT a„I,PKK M E IW -#DM WYE Y/l- OOLOPAW /=7 /, oI Z m N n m ii Prig �`{ M x m z 1`f �dmli Mountain Haus ....,.L - W%ffT a„I,PKK M E IW -#DM WYE Y/l- OOLOPAW /=7 K M z / m `\ z fit m �+ p ZMN n m n m 70 m Z ° Mountain Haus �e urrrK . %1WerrwAA� O� E IEAWA OPM •AA, OOldU 30 any a 11 avog P A F 1 17 Mountain Haus R FM WOW"AL . MF T 9RRAPWE 9 ��` • m T N m O " Z 7o N n m n T M xmZ A F 1 17 Mountain Haus R FM WOW"AL . MF T 9RRAPWE rw ooLauoo Mn 183 Al 0� ()p �N my x_ rn V p (�� O ° Mountain Haus •EO trE7TAL • WENT EXTIUMCE M E WEAOOM OPW4E > morn 11111 COLQUCO SWE7 D7Orn� 9 w O ZmN —' mfirn MmZ 183 Al 0� ()p �N my x_ rn V p (�� O ° Mountain Haus •EO trE7TAL • WENT EXTIUMCE M E WEAOOM OPW4E 11111 COLQUCO SWE7 d o Ib (d Id J r (� n m ii T XmZ FM UAfT,AL - MOT ENTRAWE M E IENKM WYE YI1L GOLOIu00 1t1 1! w d o Ib (d Id � r Z7oN n m ii T XmZ FM UAfT,AL - MOT ENTRAWE M E IENKM WYE YI1L GOLOIu00 1t1 1! w Mountain Haus FM UAfT,AL - MOT ENTRAWE M E IENKM WYE YI1L GOLOIu00 1t1 sig ■ Quqns? Call ihC PlanllIli St�:ii �:l ?%i-21>� APPLICATION FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL �COMMISSION APPROVAL 1t TO WA OF PAIL GENERAL INFORMATION This application is for any project requiring approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission. For specific information, see the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. The application can not be accepted until all required information is submitted. The project may also reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Design Review Board. A. TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Additional GRFA (250) Amendment ved Development Plan ❑ Bed and Break -fast ❑ ipl ypc: ) ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ j o xterior Alteration ❑ Major or ❑ Minor Subdivision ( it Vill be) ❑ Rezoning ❑ or or ❑ Minor CCII Exterior Alteration ❑ Sign Variance (Lionshead) Variance ❑ Special Development District ❑ Zoning Code Amendment ❑ Major or ❑ Minor Amendment to an SDD B. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: fir✓ � ��, � v_ v P-1�1� � -t �d)14C� t� � �,/r4 t'� � � ��Z C. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT T l BLOCKTv�a rr FILING L . /r L -ug cam l NCS ADDRESS:7gL �(r �1�� 4 �A��BUILDING NAMEIAr r�� D. ZONING:�i�1 It AL4f[d�y`�1(?i�1 t.�'t"�' 1�'� • �'• E. NAME OF OWNER(S): 1 -1 �c�t`►,—n �1. %ta4� ��».iY� timet I I.�! Z��! %� L 4— 1 ALf MAILING ADDRESS: F. OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S): G. NAME OF REPRESENTA H. FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE. SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657. For Office Use Ong: Fee Paid/# 5��. R? Ck#: By Application Date: PEC Meeting Date: Revised 6/96 L_� 03/09/98 07:53 FAX 9704764901 0 March 6, 1998 Tom Moorhead Town of Vail 75 S_ Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 VIA FAX: 479-2157 FRITZLEN PI Re: Mountain Haus West Entry Lease Agreements Dear Toni: VPB is representing the Mountain Haus in their bid to redevelop tht Entry which adjoins Slifer Plaza. FPB has been working with the 7 department on the redevelopment of Slifer Placa and have incorpor the new entry solution. We met with Town Council on 02-24-98 an proceed with the public approval process. Per discussions with Gee for Landscape, Setback, and Site Coverage Variances. At this time discussions with the TOV regarding lease agreements for building ( The existing Mountain Haus West Entry Canopy extends on to TO' more permanent Entry Way Stnicture that would occupy the same I preliminary solutions). Does the TOV have any current lease agreements of a similar natur feedback on this matter. Because the TOV redevelopment of the S1 in late April 1998, we would appreciate moving forward as quickly ease agreement. Please contact myself of Lynn Fritzlen with quesi Sincerely, Stephanie Lord Architect cc. George Ruther, TOV Planner 479-2452 7 Moontoio —rd Planning • Architecture • 1650 £asp Vail Valley Drive Fallridse C-1 9 Vail, CO 01657 a #@colorado. tier • 1& 001 A R C H I T E C T S Mountain Haus's West OVV, Public Works Lted,the design objectives into I received approval to rge�Rulher, we are applying we would also like to start a Town oFVail Iand, land- FPB is proposing sic footprint (see attached We would appreciate your F Plaza is expected to begin possible regarding the ,s and/or comments - 476 -4901 a (970)476-6342 r 0• 9704764901 wvl_WW.O4;", FRITZLEN PI a a I A- 03 09/98 07:53 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERI �``♦- tiff �``I1 i i r I I 1 ; \ - 1 jrr4ir 1 � � ` -�+fit► _+� �� +- � s -i I l` 1 I I 1 i\ +\ �� \ j 1 i ,1 i i / �� / 711 /�i� ' l\,♦ ♦ � � 1�\\•� ♦ � � � 1 � 1 �♦ • ♦ 1 / / � / + � Irl �\II l rr`/� ,711 i� / / i / 7! 11\♦`♦`�♦`� � � ` I l . _ � �```\j 1111/��'++�+ � � + �'/17111♦` � � � ♦ j �� / 7711• � �i i � j ! I , I � \ i ♦ r! 1 I ♦ ` i � r �2l1 �---- [A 003 03/09/98 07:53 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN P li� 004 E Mountain Haus Adjacent Owners: Property: Adjacent Fountain and Plaza, Parking Structure Owner: Town of Vail c/o Finance Department 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Property: Vail Athletic Club Owner: Vail Limited Partnership 6827 Cedarbrook Drive Bloomfield Hills, MI 48301-3018 RC�p�r✓iy A- �wS �� Nt C— 2-A—\1 S ,tea. 14 06(5+6 Planning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 • Vail, CO 81657 • fpbarchtn-i;' ,,— ;, > nor A R C H I T E C T S (9 7/0) 471-6342 • PEC SUBMITTAL MOUNTAIN HAUS New West Entrance Site Coverage, Set Back, And Landscaping Variance Location of Proposal: Mountain Haus 292 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Zoning: Public Accomodation District Lot Size: 21,610.35 sq ft Proposal: New West Entry to the Mountain Haus Approx dimensions 10'-2" x 20'-4" = 208.8 sq ft See attach sketches Site Coverage Variance (12-7A-9) Non -conforming existing condition Required: Shall not exceed 55% of the total site area 21,610.35 sq ft x .55 = 11,885.69 sq ft Actual: 17,909.20 sq ft Proposed: 208.8 sq ft E A R C H I T E C T S Set Back Variance (12-7A-6) Non -conforming existing condition Required: Minimum front, side, and rear setback shall be twenty feet Actual: zero Proposed: Extend approximately 20' over West Property Line with Entrance Feature Landscaping and Site Development (12-7A-10) Required: At least 30% of the total site area shall be landscaped Actual: Proposed: No reduction in square footage area - Change in Landscaping elements KA9527 Mountain Haus\9527C\Task013 - Basement\Correspondence\var0225.wpd Planning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 & Vail, CO 81657 9 fpbarcht@vail.net • fax (970) 476-4901 • (970) 476-6342 FEB—I0-97 IG -59 FROM- LAND TITLE GUARANTEE VAIE ID- 303 47G 4534 PAGE 7 LAIN 1J i I I I-V, l,TUF KAN'l'Eh ULJMFA-N 108 South Frontage Road West #203 AO �-� P.O. Box 357 Vail, CO 81657 LAND TITLE (970) 476-2251 GUARANTEE Fax 4764534 COMPANY (V -.,A T -D Date: z 't '1' Time: Fax #: -7 — `--�� c� I Phone: C --A _ C,— From: ,—From: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): Should you have any problems, please contact the sender at (974) 476-2251 Message: sG� l —U$ 2 — For the third year in a row, our underwriter, OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL 7I77 E INSUI?ANCE COMPANY, is the only title underwriter to receive a claims paying ability rating of A+ from Standard & Poor's - the highest rating given by S&P to any title insurer to date!!! 108 South Fronupe Road Wtst #203 Vai). CO 81657 0030 Bewlm A Raw #226 Avon. CO a)620 (970) 476-2251 phone (470) 4764534 fax (970) 444.3099nt qba (970) 949-4892 fzA 02/10/97 17:02 TX/RX N0.6829 P.001 0 FEB -70-97 I6 -S9 FROM: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE VALE ID_ 303 476 4534 OLD KEP'MLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A L T A C O M M I T M E N T - Charges - ALTA Owner Policy Tax Report TOTAL - - SCHEDULE A Our Order ## V256190 For information Only $1,810.00 (RRISSUE RATE) $20.00 $1,830.00 *** THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE, BUT AN ESTIMATE OF FEES. WHEN REFERRING TO THIS ORDER, PLEASE REFERENCE OUR ORDER NO. V256190 *** 1. Effective Date: January 02, 1997 at S:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be issued, and proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 10-17-92 $790,000.00 Proposed Insured: DENNIS TOWNSEND The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple e t t he GAB-COTI, LTD. A COLORADO CORPORATION The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: CONDOMINIUM UNIT 691, THE MOUNTAIN HAUS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF, RECORDED DECEMBER 21, 1970 IN BOOK 219 AT PAGE 363 AND AS DEFINED IN CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1971 IN BOOK 219 ,AT PAGE 532 AND AMENDMENT TO SAID DECLARATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 22, 1978 IN BOOK 278 AT PAGE 876 AND RERECORDED AUGUST 7, 1989 IN BOOK 467 AT PAGE 485 AND FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1987 IN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 761, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. ?AGS 1 02/10/97 17:02 TX/RX NO.6829 P.002 PAGE 2 El FEB -10-97 16:59 FROM: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE VAIL ID= 303 476 4534 PAGE 3 A L T A`" C O M M I T M E N T SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order ## V256190 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet_ 6. Faxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. 8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any_ 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475, 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 47.5. J.I. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMIT'T'ING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 10, 1962, IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179. 12. THOSE PROVISIONS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS, EASEMEN'T'S, AND RESTRICTIONS, WHICH ARE A BURDEN TO THE CONDOMINIUM UNIT DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED January 15, 1971, IN BOOK 219 AT PAGE 532 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED November 22, 1978, IN BOOK 278 AT PAGE 816 AND RERECORDED AUGUST 7, 1987 IN BOOK 467 AT PAGE 485 AND FIRST SUPPT,FMFNT TO FTR ST AM1GT7nMrVT RrC<)RDr ISTTr7TT�T ? R , 1 0 ^ -� TrT 130C)K n AT PAGE 13. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF THE MOUNTAIN HAUS. 14. EXISTING LEASES AND 'TENANCIES. L5. TERMS, CONDITIONS• AND PROVISIONS OF APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT TO ERECT OR MAINTAIN A STRUCTURE ON A PUBLIC RIGHT -OF --WAY RECORDED March 19, 1993 IN BOOK 604 AT PAGE 483. PAGE 4 02/10/97 17:02 TX/RX NO.6829 P.003 N A ll TO19,Y Mesign Review Acteon Form TOWN OF VAIL Project Name: Mountain Haus Project Description: Revised west entry addition to Unit 101 Owner, Address and Phone: john Railton, P.O. Box 430, Avon, Co. 81620 Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: same Project Street Address: 292 East Meadow Drive Legal Description: Lot 5, Part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing Parcel Number: Building Name: Mountain Haus Comments: Board / Staff Action Motion by: Pierce Action: Approved Seconded by: Woldrich Vote: 5-0 Conditions: approved per plans dated 9/2/98 Town Planner: George Ruther Date: 9/2/98 DRB Fee Pre -Paid: $20.00 APR -24-1990 13:42 V, LLCal 7�40 .., I VAIL FIRE DEPT. 970 479 2176 P.01 V, V/' , //I 42 West Meadow Drive Vail Fire Department Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2250 April 24, 1998 Stephanie Lord Frinlen, Pierre Briner 1650 Sunburst Drivoe, GI Vigil, Co. 81657 Re: Completion of US Engineering Fire Sprinkler Work at Mountain Maus Pear Stephanie, This letter will serve a final approval of the work included under the initial permit issued to US Engineering as it relates to the retroactive installation of thefire sprinkler system. We have received a copy of the stamped plans from BFPF- and have approved the plans as as-builts. We are still anticipating completion of the fire sprinkler system in Units 101, 103, and 105. Upon successful completion of those units, we will sign off on the final certificate of occupancy. Please contact us if you need additional information. Sincerely, Michael McGee Fire Marshal cc: Chief Duran Gary Goodell, Chief Building Official Perry Mathews, BFPE Gary Montoya, US Engineering TOTAL P.01 TOWN 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138/479-2139 FAX 970-479-2452 February 14, 1997 Lynn Fritzlcn Fritzlcn Pierce Briner Architects P.O. Box 57 Vail, Colorado 91657 RE: The Mountain flaus Dear Lynn: Fc� Department of Community Development Happy Valentine's Day! Thank you for meeting with me and Dirk Mason on Friday, February 7, 1997, regarding the Mountain Haus redevelopment study. As agreed, Dirk and I presented the Mountain Haus redevelopment information to the planners at our meeting this week. From a strict design perspective, everyone was very supportive and excited about the potential for aesthetic improvements at the Mountain Haus. With that in mind, we discussed the pros and cons and the possible review process that you would need to undertake in order to accomplish your goals with the redevelopment. As you know, there are two ways to proceed with this project: Apply for a variance application with regard to building height, setbacks (potentially) and site coverage (potentially). 2. Apply for the establishment of a Special Development District (SDD). Due to the circumstances regarding the existing height of the Mountain Haus, and the existing building footprint in relationship to the property lines, there is no "clean" way to proceed with this particular redevelopment. There arc pros and cons to either alternative. As it relates to the height variance, the staff believes that the issue regarding maintenance and upkeep of the roof could be construed as a practical difficulty or extraordinary circumstance. Additionally, the fact that the building was constructed prior to the Town's adoption of zoning could also be a consideration. Therefore, it may be possible that the Planning & Environmental Commission would be willing to grant sonic relief from the height requirements in order to allow for the redesign of the roof and to provide for proper drainage. However, the planning staff felt that it would be difficult to support a height variance for the proposed dormers, as they are aesthetic improvements, and aesthetics cannot be taken into consideration in the review of a variance. AM RECYCLED PAPER As it relates to the establishment of a Special Development District, historically, the Town has approved Special Development Districts for the creation of "new development" and/or demo/rebuild projects. The staff believes that the establishment of an SDD for the Mountain Haus would be difficult to achieve given that the primaryjustification for the SDD would simply be to circumvent the existing development standards in the Public Accommodation lone District (particularly building height). I realize that the above information docs not give you a whole lot to go on at this point. However, because of the existing conditions on the property, there is no just perfect way to proceed with this type of application. Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us and I look forward to hearing tiom you soon. Sincerely, �j,� Iv ; - Mike Mollica Assistant Director of Community Development MM/jr cc: Sandra Gray, General Manager Dirk Mason, Town Planner IT �i -4 SIN iii sn- �� 1 ail 1 i r.._ rr..air - f� A 00 tiAW i,. ; •-x� Fi TI VIIIIII .�,ofai �' , ,tltltll�piiSil�,� r: a�` _1/' /�� .%i/f - /r ( •�'� :fir A� ��j •`. i j1!�:::ylll;tcII�jrtlII �jniu'r" AV 11404 "-wid AIM : (� get, . r of /i •H. AA �i�.�y ♦' /7 r/' llfill�l�+� . 11j 7L �• 1 ..,, �Ii .i All ■IiL r /+ .� �,�s• /'�./%.. ./�� `rj+ � f��+►��t.sI�9�w alb• �'Ar!,�•YI SON, JIM, fl A TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ADD/ALT COMM BUILD PERMT Job Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location...: MOUNTAIN HAUS Parcel No..: 2101-082-28-000 Project No.: PRJ97-0008 APPLICANT HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC 1020 WEST 1ST AVENUE, DENVER CO 80223 CONTRACTOR HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC 1020 WEST 1ST AVENUE, DENVER CO 80223 OWNER MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC S � LO 292 E. MEADOW DR, VAIL CO 81657 Permit #: B97-0015 Status...: ISSUED Applied..: 02/05/1997 Issued...: 03/20/1997 Expires..: -09/16/1997 Phone: 3038251313 Phone: 3038251313 Phone: 476-2434 Description: TOV/Comm. Dev. COMMON AREAS REMODEL AND FIRE SUPRESSION SYS Clean-up Deps efund Occupancy: R1 Multi -Family approved Type Construction: II FR Type II Fire Resistive Type Occupancy: amount ��% Valuation: 1,000,000 Add Sq Ft este Fireplace Information: Restricted: NOf Gas Appliances: #Of Gas Logs: Of Wood/Pallet: *********************************************************** FEE SUMMARY********************************************************** Building-----> 4,340.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> .00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 7,914.00 Plan Check --- > 2,821.00 DRB Fee-----------------> .00 Additional Fees --------- > .00 Investigation> .00 Recreation Fee ---------- > .00 Total Permit Fee--------> 7,914.00 Will Call ---- > 3.00 Clean -Up Deposit--------> 750.00 Payments ---------------- > 7,914.00 TOTAL FEES--------------> 7,914.00 BALANCE DUE ------------- > .00 ********************************************************************************************************************************** Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division: 02/05/1997 CHARLIE Action: NOTE PLANS TO DAN 03/20/1997 DAN Action: APPR Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dept: PLANNING Division: 03/19/1997 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division: 02/05/1997 CHARLIE Action: NOTE PLANS TO FIRE 03/19/1997 MIKE M Action: APPR appvd by mcgee Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS Dept: PUB WORK Division: 03/19/1997 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A ********************************************************************************************************************************** See Page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TE 2138 0 OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM Send Clean -Up Deposit To: MOUNTAIN HAUS CCWASSOC SIGNATURE OF Ofj OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER ******************************************************************************** CONDITIONS Permit #: B97-0015 as of 04/17/97 Status: ISSUED Permit Type: ADD/ALT COMM BUILD PERMT Applied: 02/05/1997 Applicant: HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Issued: 03/20/1997 3038251313 To Expire: 09/16/1997 Job Address: Location:'MOUNTAIN HAUS Parcel No: 2101-082-28-000 Description: COMMON AREAS REMODEL AND FIRE SUPRESSION SYS Conditions: 1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. 2. STAGING TO BE ON MOUNTAIN HAUS PROPERTY ONLY 3. ALL PENETRATIONS IN CORRIDOR WALLS AND CEILINGS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIAL 4. EXITWAYS TO REMAIN OPEN AND UNOBSTRUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 5. EXISTING SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS INSPECTED AND REPLACED IF NOT WORKING PROPERLY 6. NO MECHANICAL WORK CAN BE STARTED UNTIL MECHANICAL PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL **************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt **************************************************************** Statemnt Number: REC-0261 Amount: 5,093.00 04/17/97 13:13 Payment Method: ---------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK Notation: #87294 Init: CD Permit No: B97-0015 Type: A -COMM ADD/ALT COMM BUILD P Parcel No: 2101-082-28-000 Site Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS Total Fees: 7,914.00 This Payment 5,093.00 Total ALL Pmts: 7,914.00 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount O1 0000 41310 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 4,340.00 O1 0000 22002• CLEANUP DEPOSITS 750.00 O1 0000 41336 ---------------------------------------------------------------- WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT Job Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location...: MOUNTAIN HAUS 292 Parcel No..: 2101-082-28-000 Project No.: PRJ97-0008 APPLICANT RIVIERA ELECTRIC CONST., CO P.O. BOX 18193, AVON,CO 80110 CONTRACTOR RIVIERA ELECTRIC CONST., CO P.O. BOX 18193, AVON,CO 80110 OWNER MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC 292 E. MEADOW DR, VAIL CO 81657 Description: COMMON AREAS IMPROVEMENTS Permit #: E97-0014 Status...: ISSUED E. MEADApplied..: 02/05/1997 Issued...: 03/20/1997 Expires..: 09/16/1997 Phone: 949-6095 Phone: 949-6095 Phone: 476-2434 Valuation: 70,000.00 *********************************************************** FEE SUMMARY********************************************************** Electrical --- > 1,247.00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 1,250.00 DRB Fee ---> .00 Additional Fees --------- > .00 Investigation> .00 Total Permit Fee--------> 1,250.00 Will Call ---- > 3.00 Payments ---------------- > 1,250.00 TOTAL FEES --- > 1,250.00 BALANCE DUE ------------- > .00 ********************************************************************************************************************************** Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT Deppt: BUILDING Division: 02/05/1997 CHARLIE Action: NOTE PLANS TO ERN 03/20/1997 DAN Action: APPR Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division: 03/20/1997 DAN Action: APPR N/A ********************************************************************************************************************************** CONDITION OF APPROVAL ********************************************************************************************************************************** DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM ,�-- �J, SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit #: M97-0012 Job Address...: 292 E MEADOW DR Status...: ISSUED Location......: MOUNTAIN HAUS COMMON AREAS Applied..: 02/05/1997 Parcel No.....: 2101-082-28-000 Issued...: 04/14/1997 Project Number: PRJ97-0008 Expires..: 10/11/1997 APPLICANT U.S. ENGINEERING COMPANY 729 SOUTH EAST 8TH STREET, P.O. CONTRACTOR U.S. ENGINEERING COMPANY 729 SOUTH EAST 8TH STREET, P.O. OWNER MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC 292 E. MEADOW DR, VAIL CO 81657 Description: FIRE SUPPRESSION SYTEM Fireplace Information: Restricted: #Of Gas Appliances Phone: 970-669-1666 BOX 905, LOVELAND, CO 80539 Phone: 970-669-1666 BOX 905, LOVELAND, CO 80539 Phone: 476-2434 Valuation: 210,000.00 HOf Gas Logs: NOf Wood/Pallet: *********************************************************** FEE SUMMARY********************************************************** Mechanical --- > 4,200.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> .00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 5,253.00 Plan Check --- > 1,050.00 DRB Fee-----------------> .00 Additional Fees --------- > Investigation> .00 TOTAL FEES--------------> 5,253.00 Total Permit Fee--------> .00 5,253.00 Will Call ---- > 3.00 Payments ---------------- > 5,253.00 BALANCE DUE ------------- > ********************************************************************************************************************************** .00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 03/20/1997 DAN Action: APPR Dept: BUILDING Division: Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division: 03/12/1997 CHARLIE Action: NOTE P ANS TO FIRE DEPT 0,3/20/1997 DAN Action: APPR PA 03/20/1997 DAN Action: CANC 04/,091997 CHARLIE Action: NOTE REVISED SENT TO FIRE 04/14/1997 MIKE_M Action: APPR apprvd by 460 CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. ******************************************************************************** DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state Laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 7_9-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER **************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt **************************************************************** Statemnt Number: REC-0261 Amount: 5,253.00 04/18/97 08:22 Payment Method: ---------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK Notation: #2183 Init: CD Permit No: M97-0012 Type: B-MECH MECHANICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-082-28-000 Site Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS COMMON AREAS Total Fees: 5,253.00 This Payment 5,253.00 Total ALL Pmts: 5,253.00 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount O1 0000 41312 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES 4,200.00 O1 0000 41332- PLAN CHECK FEES 1,050.00 O1 0000 41336 ---------------------------------------------------------------- WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt **************************************************************** Statemnt Number: REC-0263 Amount: 1,250.00 04/21/97 11:31 Payment Method: -------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK Notation: 68276 Init: DDM Permit No: E97-0014 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-082-28-000 Site Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS 292 E. MEADOW DR Total Fees: 1,250.00 This Payment 1,250.00 Total ALL Pmts: 1,250.00 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount O1 0000 41313 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 1,247.00 O1 0000 41336 ---------------------------------------------------------------- WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 Con.taut Eagle County Assessors Office at 970-318-8640 f Pa el TOWN OF VAIL CONSTRUCTIC PERMIT # PAROL 4i: 21 -p� -, C� PERMIT APPLICATION DATE : ' -rz q-3 Ze, ti.L�, APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED ****************************** PERMIT INFORMATION ***************************** -f;,Z]-Building " [ ]-Plumbing [ ]-Electrical [ ]-Mechanical [ ]-Other Job Name: r 1�[.)UTzi �-f �j Job Address: Zef2 r, "e4c,-�L-j� (7e- ,, Legal Description: Lot Block Filing SUBDIVISION: Owners Name : G Address: 2 ivy CA170w f?ePh.471D-z'34 Architect: tTZL1e-,1J (��Qe Address: ��L� �, 7VPu CJAi.� WPh 4-%-(,F 5Z 0 General Description: riot Work Class: [ ]-New �,<]"-Alteration Number of Dwelling Units: r '= no L [ ]-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-Other Number of Accommodation Units: N mber and Type of Fireplaces: Gas A'pliances Gas Logs_ Wood/Pellet ********************* *********** L W7 -CSG/s I IONS ** *********************** BUILDING: ELECTRICAL: $ -162 pct OTHER: $ �G: $.',-I J oex::�> MECHANICAL: TOTAL: $ c cs K-: K C Lr, tom. ,�y�q —i- -E IFCONTRACTORINFO TIONOX eneral Contracto : ' l fire- Gp � Town of Vail Reg. NO.ZQI- A Address: oze-;, 14' A v U�� Phone Number:3o�,8)�$ - Electrical Contractor:Town of Vail Reg. NO. Address: Phone Number: Ad g Contractor: 0. - t"L1-AL-ALTown of Vail Reg. NO. Phone Number: Mechanical Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. NO. Address: _ Phone Number: ******************************** FOR OFFICE USE ******************************* BUILDING PERMIT FEE: _ BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE: PLUMBING PERMIT FEE: PLUMBING PLAN CHECK FEE: MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE: MECHANICAL PLAN CHECK FEE: ELECTRICAL FEE: RECREATION FEE: OTHER TYPE OF FEE: CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:" DRB FEE: TOTAZ, PERMIT FEES: afig t.b i094 � TYPE GROUP SQ —FT. VALUATION BUILDING: i SIGNATURE: ;, ZONING: Comments: SIGNATURE: G CLEAN IIP DEPOSIT REFIIND T0: �VJ� �� lJ MAR 17 197 01:56PM HYDER CONSTRUCTION 303 825 1313 P.1 Y -D - CONSTRUCTION INC. DATE: ;!5' 1-7-61 -7 TO: Nvo-4 L' ATTN: G.t_ 1 t:; OAvtoj FROM: Lk. a1f.� SUBJECT: 5,ki c?n "S TOTAL NO. OF PAGE(S) : - 1tT'g I�—( CL L)oe' . cg '::�ur- t-!(-rr,ct4KLg-r— e�; ►u'7 IF YOU RECEIVE LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF PAGES INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL (303) 825-1313, WITHIN 15 MINUTES, OTHERWISE WE WILL ASSUME YOU HAVE RECEIVED THE TRANSMISSION. 1020 \Vest First A.cnuc Denver, Colorado 80223 • (303) 825-1313 Fax (303) 825-3223 MAR 17 '97 01:57PN HYDER CONSTRUCTION 303 825 1313 = :YID= -ER _-_____.__.__�_________ CONSTRUCTION INC. (303) 825-1313 01 wm4 WALA,e--7 AW4c,- Y7-: fA*-rq epm- - 11 'y W^LA..d5P LPN 6:7 — 14- jl7rvcll�7 W41JLC2 P;� P.2 ^ % I 41AR 17 '537 01:57PM HYDER CONSTRUCTION 303 825 1313 P.3 it) i 0' ;ET:H FACiuTY_ Mr)USTRIES, INC, SUB.IEGT SHEET NO.. +3 OF __. 8Y DATE Z j " zo" srwo -rte o %T"40 ISA&M %=ff V -w ® 6w.0 X r. T`IL' CALCULATTONB 'QNTAJNED MEAEIN AAE SUPPUE13 SOLJQI.YTO AMM IN THIS BBLHGTION ANWRANALY818 OF DIERRICM INMW,'31EI, INC. PRODUCM i k:g CALCULATIONS ifiE PRbUMIMA$gY IN NATURE IND ARE NOT INTENM TO AM= TMG OALOULAV=8 ANO 86Rvxm OR?MH nXNRICrOR gWIN12R Or RUCORD, OIr5TPI„ H INOUVRIO, INC. IN REND6RINo BUCM CALCUI,ATIVM SMALL IN NOWAY 00 011 MCDTOAl"Ill ANY PROFE:-84"Allp"I8AJTY AND HERESY 018CL.111iAS ANY &NIS ALL SUCH UASIUTY OR QK='T10N. MAR 17 '97 01:57PM HYDER CONSTRUCTION 303 825 1313 DIETRICH INC) USTRIES, INC, SUBJECT P.4 FACILITY IRMEET NO. Z- OF BY DATE 00 � ND r'•i d � 'rbP' Z-70 61� m R�1al1- 1"br6h+'t vom [puri-ir 7b -Rp►iD n� [Lei Nfo- c F* I � - ,L I is 4:A u +c- Mt GALGuLAlIuNm 'AN7AINW "WEIR ARE SUPPIJEP ODLELYM ASSIAT IN THR I LWTIDN ANDgRANALYM OF DICTRICH MOUS", IES, INC. PRODUCTS. '14E CALCUI.ATIOrP , OC PREIMNARY IN NA7UNg ANC AM NOT JNTWW TD REPLACE THE CAI Cl LArMS Na SCRYICEB OF THEA - CmrrgV OR EMOINEER .OF ADCC M DICTRI ' M INDU8'IMIK INC, IN R6NDENND $1I9H CALCULATIONS Wh6 IN NO WAY pE OEF7MW TO ABSUMC AN'/ pRGFE gIONAL RE6PONWjL7Y AP0 H9g66Y 9)19CL-!MQANV ANDALL SUCH WAINLTTy OR ONLIORTM U.S. ENGINEERING, CO. • 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS RT A S'f OR rip Submitted uHAU ®�� d � A�OUNTA %e -ted 4 VAILISIXTHS FLR. RMI668 e7� _ MTHAS 6 £ 8 Apr 08 1997 DWI. -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: DENSITY: AREA OF APPLICATION: COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AF R 9 1997 TOV o COMIM, DTs DUVI TOM of Vail OFFICE COPY P�`17 RESIDENTIAL PER NFPA 13 23 GPM PER/HEAD PER\COMPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL 16' X 16' PER HEAD 3 sprinklers 75.5 gpm 175.5 qpm 75.50 gpm @ 108 psi 5.5 inch AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION # 91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SP TKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANI SIS Page 1 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HA"SS61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 125.0 175.5 108.0 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 175.5 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 75.5 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 1 61.0 K= 5.50 19.0 24.0 2 55.0 - - - - 22.8 - - - 3 54.0 K= 5.50 22.9 26.3 4 55.0 - - - - 23.4 - - - 5 61.0 K= 5.50 20.9 25.2 6 55.0 - - - - 24.8 - - - 7 55.0 - - - - 27.7 - - - 8 55.0 - - - - 36.7 - - - 9 55.0 - - - - 57.0 - - - 10 55.0 - - - - 65.3 - - - 11 54.0 - - - - 72.9 - - - 12 55.0 - - - - 72.5 - - - 13 54.0 - - - - 72.9 - - - 14 55.0 - - - - 72.5 - - - 15 54.0 - - - - 72.9 - - - 16 55.0 - - - - 72.5 - - - 17 55.0 - - - - 72.5 - - - 18 55.0 - - - - 72.5 - - - 19 55.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 20 55.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 21 54.0 - - - - 73.2 - - - 22 55.0 - - - - 72.8 - - - 23 54.0 - - - - 73.2 - - - 24 55.0 - - - - 72.8 - - - 25 55.0 - - - - 72.8 - - - 26 55.0 - - - - 73.1 - - - 27 55.0 - - - - 73.6 - - - 28 55.0 - - - - 74.1 - - - 29 55.0 - - - - 74.5 - - - 30 55.0 - - - - 74.8 - - - 31 61.0 - - - - 72.2 - - - 32 61.0 - - - - 72.2 - - - 33 61.0 - - - - 72.2 - - - 34 61.0 - - - - 72.2 - - - SP,' TKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANZ SIS Page 2 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HAJS61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 35 61.0 - - - - 72.2 - - - 36 55.0 - - - - 74.8 - - - 37 55.0 - - - - 74.8 - - - 38 55.0 - - - - 74.8 - - - 39 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 40 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 41 54.0 - - - - 75.7 - - - 42 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 43 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 44 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 45 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 46 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 47 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 48 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 49 61.0 - - - - 72.7 - - - 50 55.0 - - - - 75.3 - - - 51 55.0 - - - - 75.3 - - - 52 55.0 - - - - 75.3 - - - 53 55.0 - - - - 75.3 - - - 54 55.0 - - - - 75.3 - - - 55 55.0 - - - - 75.3 - - - 55A 55.0 - - - - 75.8 - - - S6 55.0 - - - - 76.9 - - - S5 48.0 - - - - 80.1 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 83.7 - - - S3 32.0 - - - - 87.3 - - - S2 24.0 - - - - 90.9 - - - S1 16.0 - - - - 94.5 - - - Bl 8.0 - - - - 98.2 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 99.5 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 100.4 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 101.5 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 104.6 - - - U1 1.0 - - - - 107.6 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 108.0 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 108.0 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 108.0 75.5 SPF KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA: ;IS Page 3 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HA-SS61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 1 -24.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 1.1 1 61.0 5.5 19.0 24.0 9.3 150 FTG E PE 2.6 2 55.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.135 TL 8.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 2 -24.0 1.025 PL 4.50 PF 0.6 2 55.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 9.3 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 4 55.0 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.135 TL 4.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 3 -26.3 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.9 3 54.0 5.5 22.9 26.3 10.2 150 FTG T PE -0.4 4 55.0 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.160 TL 5.50 PV 0.7 Pipe: 4 -50.3 1.025 PL 3.17 PF 4.3 4 55.0 0.0 23.4 0.0 19.6 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 0.532 TL 8.17 PV 2.6 Pipe: 5 -25.2 1.025 PL 6.00 , PF 1.3 5 61.0 5.5 20.9 25.2 9.8 150 FTG E PE 2.6 6 55.0 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.147 TL 8.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 6 -25.2 1.025 PL 15.50 PF 2.9 6 55.0 0.0 24.8 0.0 9.8 150 FTG T PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 0.147 TL 20.00 PV 0.6 Pipe: 7 -75.5 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 9.0 7 55.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 29.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 8 55.0 0.0 36.7 0.0 1.126 TL 8.00 PV 5.8 Pipe: 8 -75.5 1.025 PL 13.00 PF 20.3 8 55.0 0.0 36.7 0.0 29.4 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 9 55.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 1.126 TL 18.00 PV 5.8 Pipe: 9 -75.5 1.265 PL 12.00 PF 8.3 9 55.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 19.3 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 10 55.0 0.0 65.3 0.0 0.404 TL 20.50 PV 2.5 Pipe: 10 -75.5 1.265 PL 9.25 PF 7.2 10 55.0 0.0 65.3 0.0 19.3 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.404 TL 17.75 PV 2.5 Pipe: 11 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 11 54.0 0.0 72.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 12 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 12 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 12 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 13 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 13 54.0 0.0 72.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 14 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 SPI 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA 3IS Page 4 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HA-SS61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 0.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 15 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 15 54.0 0.0 72.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 16 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 16 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 16 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 17 0.0 1.265 PL 1.75 PF 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.000 TL 1.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 18 -75.5 1.985 PL 6.00 PF -0.3 18 55.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.045 TL 6.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 19 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 19 55.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 20 -75.5 1.985 PL 0.75 PF 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.045 TL 0.75 PV 0.4 Pipe: 21 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 21 54.0 0.0 73.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 22 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 22 0.0 1.505 PL 8.50 PF 0.0 22 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 23 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 23 54.0 0.0 73.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 24 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 24 0.0 1.505 PL 8.75 PF 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 0.000 TL 15.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 25 -75.5 1.985 PL 7.75 PF 0.3 25 55.0 0.0 72.8 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 26 55.0 0.0 73.1 0.0 0.045 TL 7.75 PV 0.4 Pipe: 26 -75.5 1.985 PL 10.17 PF 0.5 26 55.0 0.0 73.1 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 27 55.0 0.0 73.6 0.0 0.045 TL 10.17 PV 0.4 SPF 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANASIS Page 5 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\Hrr S61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 -75.5 1.985 PL 12.00 PF 0.5 27 55.0 0.0 73.6 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 28 55.0 0.0 74.1 0.0 0.045 TL 12.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 28 -75.5 1.985 PL 8.17 PF 0.4 28 55.0 0.0 74.1 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 29 55.0 0.0 74.5 0.0 0.045 TL 8.17 PV 0.4 Pipe: 29 -75.5 1.985 PL 8.00 PF 0.4 29 55.0 0.0 74.5 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.045 TL 8.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 30 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 31 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 31 0.0 1.025 PL 7.17 PF -0.0 32 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.000 TL 7.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 32 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 33 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 33 0.0 1.025 PL 2.00 PF 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 34 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 72.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 36 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 35 0.0 1.025 PL 10.75 PF 0.0 36 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.000 TL 15.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 36 0.0 1.265 PL 6.17 PF 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.000 TL 6.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 37 0.0 1.505 PL 5.58 PF 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 0.000 TL 12.58 PV 0.0 Pipe: 38 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 39 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 39 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 SPF 'LER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA ;IS Page 6 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HA'SS61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 40 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 41 54.0 0.0 75.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -3.0 42 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 41 0.0 1.025 PL 22.50 PF 0.0 42 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 29.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 42 0.0 1.025 PL 3.67 PF 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.67 PV 0.0 Pipe: 43 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 44 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 44 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 45 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 46 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 46 0.0 1.025 PL 3.25 PF 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 7.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 47 0.0 1.265 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.000 TL 4.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 48 0.0 1.265 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 72.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 50 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.000 TL 9.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 49 0.0 1.265 PL 19.00 PF 0.0 50 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.000 TL 22.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 50 0.0 1.505 PL 6.75 PF 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.000 TL 17.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 51 0.0 1.505 PL 5.33 PF 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.000 TL 12.33 PV 0.0 Pipe: 52 0.0 1.985 PL 9.25 PF 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.000 TL 20.25 PV 0.0 SPT TKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANP 3IS Page 7 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\Hev,5S61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 53 0.0 1.985 PL 1.25 PF 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.000 TL 10.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 53A -75.5 1.985 PL 0.50 PF 0.4 30 55.0 0.0 74.8 0.0 7.8 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 0.045 TL 9.50 PV 0.4 Pipe: 54 -75.5 1.985 PL 2.00 PF 0.5 55 55.0 0.0 75.3 0.0 7.8 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55A 55.0 0.0 75.8 0.0 0.045 TL 11.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 54A -75.5 1.985 PL 3.50 PF 1.2 55A 55.0 0.0 75.8 0.0 7.8 120 FTG 2ETG PE 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 76.9 0.0 0.068 TL 17.07 PV 0.4 Pipe: 55 -75.5 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.1 S6 55.0 0.0 76.9 0.0 4.4 120 FTG ---- PE 3.0 S5 48.0 0.0 80.1 0.0 0.017 TL 7.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 56 -75.5 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.1 S5 48.0 0.0 80.1 0.0 4.4 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 83.7 0.0 0.017 TL 8.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 57 -75.5 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.1 S4 40.0 0.0 83.7 0.0 4.4 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 0.017 TL 8.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 58 -75.5 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.1 S3 32.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 4.4 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 90.9 0.0 0.017 TL 8.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 59 -75.5 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.1 S2 24.0 0.0 90.9 0.0 4.4 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S1 16.0 0.0 94.5 0.0 0.017 TL 8.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 60 -75.5 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.3 S1 16.0 0.0 94.5 0.0 4.4 120 FTG E PE 3.5 B1 8.0 0.0 98.2 0.0 0.017 TL 16.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 61 -75.5 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 1.3 B1 8.0 0.0 98.2 0.0 4.4 120 FTG 2E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 99.5 0.0 0.017 TL 76.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 62 -75.5 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 0.9 B2 8.0 0.0 99.5 0.0 4.4 120 FTG ---- PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 100.4 0.0 0.017 TL 51.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 63 -75.5 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 1.1 B3 8.0 0.0 100.4 0.0 4.4 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 101.5 0.0 0.017 TL 62.00 PV 0.1 SPF 'TKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANP. SIS Page 8 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\Hx-,S61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 64 75.5 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.1 B5 1.0 0.0 104.6 0.0 1.9 120 FTG ET PE -3.0 B4 8.0 0.0 101.5 0.0 0.002 TL 35.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 65 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE U1 1.0 0.0 107.6 0.0 3.0 psi, 75.5 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 104.6 0.0 Pipe: 66 -75.5 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 U1 1.0 0.0 107.6 0.0 0.8 140 FTG E PE 0.4 U2 0.0 0.0 108.0 0.0 0.000 TL 30.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 67 -75.5 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.0 U2 0.0 0.0 108.0 0.0 0.8 140 FTG G PE 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 108.0 0.0 0.000 TL 65.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 68 -75.5 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 108.0 0.0 0.8 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 108.0 (N/A) 0.000 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 310L743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.002 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.156 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 29.4 ft/sec at pipe 8. SPT 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANP 3IS Page 9 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\H.Q`ziS61\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT -L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45 -Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.505 4.00 7.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 6.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 SPKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA" SIS Page 10 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\H,_-,361\MTN\MTHAS668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 WATER SUPPLY CURVE 132+ E psi @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 121+ Flow Test Point 110+ X 99+ P 88+ R E S, S 77+ U R E 66+ P S I 55+ 44+ 33+ 22+ LEGEND " X = Required Water Supply 108.05 psi @ 175.5 gpm 11+ 0 = Available Water Supply " 124.95 psi @ 175.5 gpm " 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FLOW (GPM) U.S. ENGINEERING, CO 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR MOUN`T'AIN HAUS CONDOMINIM 5TH FLR. UNIT 550 FILE NUMBER: MTHAS550 DATE: Apr 08, 1997 -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: AREA OF APPLICATION: COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): RESIDENTIAL PER NFPA 13 23 GPM PER/HEAD PER\COMPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL, 16' X 16' PER HEAD 4 sprinklers 98.4 gpm 198.4 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): 98.4 gpm @ 76.8 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: 1/2 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO. INC. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORI'T'Y HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION #91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SPT 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA 3IS Page 1 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HtibS61\MTN\MTHAS550.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 550 WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 124.9 198.4 76.8 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 198.4 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 98.4 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) S6 56.0 - - - - 42.8 - - - S5 48.0 - - - - 46.2 - - - 1 48.0 K= 5.50 19.0 24.0 2 48.0 - - - - 21.1 - - - 3 48.0 K= 5.50 21.6 25.5 4 48.0 - - - - 22.4 - - - 5 48.0 - - - - 25.9 - - - 6 48.0 K= 5.50 19.5 24.3 7 48.0 K= 5.50 19.9 24.6 8 48.0 - - - - 20.4 - - - 9 48.0 - - - - 20.8 - - - 10 48.0 - - - - 33.7 - - - 11 48.0 - - - - 33.7 - - - 12 48.0 - - - - 33.7 - - - 13 48.0 - - - - 42.7 - - - 14 48.0 - - - - 43.6 - - - 30 48.0 - - - - 44.9 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 49.9 - - - S3 32.0 - - - - 53.6 - - - S2 24.0 - - - - 57.3 - - - S1 16.0 - - - - 61.0 - - - Bl 8.0 - - - - 64.9 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 67.0 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 68.5 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 70.2 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 73.3 - - - U1 1.0 - - - - 76.3 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 76.8 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 76.8 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 76.8 98.4 SP' 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANP. 3IS Page 2 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\H.-SS61\MTN\MTHAS550.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 550 PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 1 -24.0 1.025 PL 7.75 PF 2.1 1 48.0 5.5 19.0 24.0 9.3 150 FTG 3E PE 0.0 2 48.0 0.0 21.1 0.0 0.135 TL 15.25 PV 0.6 Pipe: 2 -24.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 1.3 2 48.0 0.0 21.1 0.0 9.3 150 FTG T PE 0.0 4 48.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.135 TL 9.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 3 -25.5 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.8 3 48.0 5.5 21.6 25.5 9.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 4 48.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.151 TL 5.50 PV 0.7 Pipe: 4 -49.5 1.025 PL 2.33 PF 3.5 4 48.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 19.3 150 FTG T PE 0.0 5 48.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 0.516 TL 6.83 PV 2.5 Pipe: 5 -24.3 1.025 PL 4.50 PF 1.2 6 48.0 5.5 19.5 24.3 9.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 9 48.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.138 TL 9.00 PV 0.6 Pipe: 6 -24.6 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.5 7 48.0 5.5 19.9 24.6 9.5 150 FTG E PE 0.0 8 48.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 0.141 TL 3.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 7 -24.6 1.025 PL 2.33 PF 0.3 8 48.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 9.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 9 48.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.141 TL 2.33 PV 0.6 Pipe: 8 48.8 1.025 PL 5.75 PF 5.2 5 48.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 19.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 9 48.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.503 TL 10.25 PV 2.4 Pipe: 9 -98.4 1.265 PL 11.75 PF 7.7 5 48.0 0.0 25.9 0.0 25.1 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 12 48.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.659 TL 11.75 PV 4.2 Pipe: 10 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 10 48.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 11 48.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.000 TL 1.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 11 0.0 1.025 PL 2.33 PF 0.0 11 48.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 12 48.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.000 TL 6.83 PV 0.0 Pipe: 12 -98.4 1.265 PL 8.25 PF 9.1 12 48.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 25.1 150 FTG T PE 0.0 13 48.0 0.0 42.7 0.0 0.659 TL 13.75 PV 4.2 Pipe: 13 -98.4 1.985 PL 2.75 PF 0.9 13 48.0 0.0 42.7 0.0 10.2 150 FTG T PE 0.0 14 48.0 0.0 43.6 0.0 0.073 TL 11.75 PV 0.7 SPF KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA- ;IS Page 3 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HAn361\MTN\MTHAS550.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 550 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 -98.4 1.985 PL 2.00 PF 1.3 14 48.0 0.0 43.6 0.0 10.2 120 FTG ETG PE 0.0 30 48.0 0.0 44.9 0.0 0.111 TL 11.93 PV 0.7 Pipe: 15 -0.1 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.0 S6 56.0 0.0 42.8 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S5 48.0 0.0 46.2 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 16 -98.4 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 1.3 30 48.0 0.0 44.9 0.0 10.2 120 FTG T PE 0.0 S5 48.0 0.0 46.2 0.0 0.111 TL 11.96 PV 0.7 Pipe: 17 -98.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S5 48.0 0.0 46.2 0.0 5.8 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 0.028 TL 8.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 18 -98.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S4 40.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 5.8 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 53.6 0.0 0.028 TL 8.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 19 -98.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S3 32.0 0.0 53.6 0.0 5.8 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 57.3 0.0 0.028 TL 8.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 20 -98.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S2 24.0 0.0 57.3 0.0 5.8 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S1 16.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 0.028 TL 8.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 21 -98.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.4 S1 16.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 5.8 120 FTG E PE 3.5 B1 8.0 0.0 64.9 0.0 0.028 TL 16.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 22 -98.4 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 2.1 B1 8.0 0.0 64.9 0.0 5.8 120 FTG 2E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 67.0 0.0 0.028 TL 76.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 23 -98.4 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 1.4 B2 8.0 0.0 67.0 0.0 5.8 120 FTG ---- PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 68.5 0.0 0.028 TL 51.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 24 -98.4 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 1.7 B3 8.0 0.0 68.5 0.0 5.8 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 70.2 0.0 0.028 TL 62.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 25 -98.4 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.1 B4 8.0 0.0 70.2 0.0 2.5 120 FTG ET PE 3.0 B5 1.0 0.0 73.3 0.0 0.004 TL 35.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 26 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE Ul 1.0 0.0 76.3 0.0 3.0 psi, 98.4 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 73.3 0.0 SPT 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN IS Page 4 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\ S61\MTN\MTHAS550.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 550 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 -98.4 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 U1 1.0 0.0 76.3 0.0 1.0 140 FTG E PE 0.4 U2 0.0 0.0 76.8 0.0 0.000 TL 30.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 28 -98.4 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.0 U2 0.0 0.0 76.8 0.0 1.0 140 FTG G PE 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 76.8 0.0 0.000 TL 65.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 29 -98.4 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 76.8 0.0 1.0 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 76.8 (N/A) 0.000 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 31OL743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.007 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.200 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 25.1 ft/sec at pipe 12. (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly SPP ?KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA' !IS Page 5 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\HAzS6l\MTN\MTHAS550.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 550 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT-L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45-Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 SPLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA' "IS Page 6 Date: 04/08/1997 C:\Hti..361\MTN\MTHAS550.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 550 WATER SUPPLY CURVE 132+ psi @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 121+ Flow Test Point 110+ 99+ P 88+ R E S S 77+ U R E 66+ P S I 55+ 44+ 33+ 22+ LEGEND " n X = Required Water Supply " 76.82 psi @ 198.4 gpm " 11+ 0 = Available Water Supply " 124.94 psi @ 198.4 gpm if 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FLOW (GPM) U.S. ENGINEERING, CO 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIM SIXTH FLOOR CORRIDOR 5HD FILE NUMBER: MTHASCOR DATE: Apr 07, 1997 -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: DENSITY: AREA OF APPLICATION: COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: PER NFPA 13 a� 17912 23 gpm/PER/HD. FIVE HEADS IN CORRIDOR 100 SQ FT PER HEAD 5 sprinklers 130.4 gpm 230.4 gpm 130.4 gpm @ 73.8 psi 1/2 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION ## 91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SPI KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA 3IS Page 1 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: •MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 124.9 230.4 73.8 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 230.4 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 130.4 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA - NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 1 61.0 - - - - 22.7 - - - 2 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 3 54.0 - - - - 25.7 - - - 4 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 5 61.0 - - - - 22.7 - - - 6 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 7 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 8 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 9 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 10 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 11 54.0 K= 5.50 19.0 24.0 12 55.0 - - - - 19.1 - - - 13 54.0 K= 5.50 19.6 24.3 14 55.0 - - - - 19.9 - - - 15 54.0 K= 5.50 23.5 26.7 16 55.0 - - - - 23.7 - - - 17 55.0 - - - - 24.6 - - - 18 55.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 19 55.0 K= 5.50 24.6 27.3 20 55.0 - - - - 25.5 - - - 21 54.0 - - - - 26.0 - - - 22 55.0 - - - - 25.6 - - - 23 54.0 - - - - 26.0 - - - 24 55.0 - - - - 25.6 - - - 25 55.0 - - - - 25.6 - - - 26 55.0 K= 5.50 26.2 28.2 27 55.0 - - - - 27.4 - - - 28 55.0 - - - - 29.0 - - - 29 55.0 - - - - 30.0 - - - 30 55.0 - - - - 31.0 - - - 31 61.0 - - - - 28.4 - - - 32 61.0 - - - - 28.4 - - - 33 61.0 - - - - 28.4 - - - 34 61.0 - - - - 28.4 - - - SPI_ KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA,-3IS Page 2 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 35 61.0 - - - - 28.4 - - - 36 55.0 - - - - 31.0 - - - 37 55.0 - - - - 31.0 - - - 38 55.0 - - - - 31.0 - - - 39 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 40 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 41 60.0 - - - - 30.0 - - - 42 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 43 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 44 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 45 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 46 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 47 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 48 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 49 61.0 - - - - 29.5 - - - 50 55.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - 51 55.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - 52 55.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - 53 55.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - 54 55.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - 55 55.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - S6 55.0 - - - - 34.7 - - - S5 48.0 - - - - 38.0 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 41.9 - - - S3 32.0 - - - - 45.7 - - - S2 24.0 - - - - 49.6 - - - S1 16.0 - - - - 53.4 - - - B1 8.0 - - - - 57.6 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 61.6 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 64.8 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 67.3 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 70.3 - - - Ul 1.0 - - - - 73.3 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 73.8 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 73.8 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 73.8 130.4 SP. Date: 04/07/1997 1KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA ,.._SIS Page 3 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. PIPE DATA CORRIDOR PIPE TAG END Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) 1 Pipe: 1 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 61.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 2 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 2 Pipe: 2 0.0 1.025 PL 4.50 PF 0.0 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 4 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 4.50 PV 0.0 3 Pipe: 3 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 54.0 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 4 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 4 0.0 1.025 PL 3.17 PF 0.0 4 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 8.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 5 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 5 61.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 6 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 6 0.0 1.025 PL 15.50 PF 0.0 6 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 20.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 7 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 8 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 8 0.0 1.025 PL 13.00 PF 0.0 8 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 9 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 18.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 9 0.0 1.025 PL 12.00 PF 0.0 9 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 10 55.0 0.0 25.3 O.p 0.000 TL 19.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 10 0.0 1.265 PL 9.25 PF 0.0 10 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.000 TL 17.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 11 -24.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.5 11 54.0 5.5 19.0 24.0 9.3 150 FTG E PE -0.4 12 55.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.135 TL 3.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 12 -24.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.8 12 55.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 9.3 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.135 TL 6.00 PV 0.6 Pipe: 13 -24.3 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.8 13 54.0 5.5 19.6 24.3 9.5 150 FTG T PE -0.4 14 55.0 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.138 TL 5.50 PV 0.6 S4WKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANt.__SIS Page 4 - Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 -48.3 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 4.7 14 55.0 0.0 19.9 0.0 18.8 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 0.493 TL 9.50 PV 2.4 Pipe: 15 -26.7 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.6 15 54.0 5.5 23.5 26.7 10.4 150 FTG E PE -0.4 16 55.0 0.0 23.7 0.0 0.164 TL 3.50 PV 0.7 Pipe: 16 -26.7 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.9 16 55.0 0.0 23.7 0.0 10.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 0.164 TL 5.50 PV 0.7 Pipe: 17 -75.0 1.265 PL 1.75 PF 0.7 17 55.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 19.1 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.399 TL 1.75 PV 2.5 Pipe: 18 -75.0 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 0.3 18 55.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 7.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 25.5 0.0 0.044 TL 6.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 19 -27.3 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.9 19 55.0 5.5 24.6 27.3 10.6 150 FTG T PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 25.5 0.0 0.171 TL 5.50 PV 0.8 Pipe: 20 -102.3 1.985 PL 0.75 PF 0.1 20 55.0 0.0 25.5 0.0 10.6 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.079 TL 0.75 PV 0.8 Pipe: 21 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 21 54.0 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 22 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 22 0.0 1.505 PL 8.50 PF 0.0 22 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 23 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 23 54.0 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 24 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 24 0.0 1.505 PL 8.75 PF 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.000 TL 15.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 25 -102.3 1.985 PL 7.75 PF 0.6 25 55.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 10.6 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 26 55.0 5.5 26.2 28.2 0.079 TL 7.75 PV 0.8 Pipe: 26 -130.4 1.985 PL 9.50 PF 1.2 26 55.0 5.5 26.2 28.2 13.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 27 55.0 0.0 27.4 0.0 0.124 TL 9.50 PV 1.2 S VKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN,. ISIS Page 5 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 -130.4 1.985 PL 12.67 PF 1.6 27 55.0 0.0 27.4 0.0 13.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 5 28 i 55.0 0.0 29.0 0.0 0.124 TL 12.67 PV 1.2 Pipe: 28 -130.4 1.985 PL 8.17 PF 1.0 28 55.0 0.0 29.0 0.0 13.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 29 55.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.124 TL 8.17 PV 1.2 Pipe: 29 -130.4 1.985 PL 8.00 PF 1.0 i 29 55.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 13.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.124 TL 8.00 PV 1.2 Pipe: 30 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 31 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 31 0.0 1.025 PL 7.17 PF 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.000 TL 7.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 32 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 33 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 33 0.0 1.025 PL 2.00 PF 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 34 0.0 1.025 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 36 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.000 TL 10.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 35 0.0 1.025 PL 10.75 PF 0.0 36 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.000 TL 15.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 36 0.0 1.265 PL 6.17 PF 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.000 TL 6.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 37 0.0 1.505 PL 5.58 PF 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.000 TL 12.58 PV 0.0 Pipe: 38 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 39 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 39 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 SPF KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA_y3IS Page 6 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 40 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 41 60.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 42 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 41 0.0 1.025 PL 22.50 PF 0.0 42 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 29.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 42 0.0 1.025 PL 3.67 PF 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 3.67 PV 0.0 Pipe: 43 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 44 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 44 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 45 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 46 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 3.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 46 0.0 1.025 PL 3.25 PF 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 7.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 47 0.0 1.265 PL 2.00 PF 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 48 0.0 1.265 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 50 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.000 TL 9.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 49 0.0 1.265 PL 17.50 PF 0.0 50 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.000 TL 20.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 50 0.0 1.505 PL 6.75 PF 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.000 TL 17.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 51 0.0 1.505 PL 5.33 PF 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.000 TL 12.33 PV 0.0 Pipe: 52 0.0 1.985 PL 9.25 PF 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.000 TL 20.25 PV 0.0 SPI KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA�.SIS Page 7 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 53 0.0 1.985 PL 1.25 PF 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.000 TL 10.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 53A -130.4 1.985 PL 0.50 PF 1.2 30 55.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 13.5 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.124 TL 9.50 PV 1.2 Pipe: 54 -130.4 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 2.5 55 55.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 13.5 120 FTG 2EG PE 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 34.7 0.0 0.187 TL 13.61 PV 1.2 Pipe: 55 -130.4 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.3 S6 55.0 0.0 34.7 0.0 7.7 120 FTG ---- PE 3.0 S5 48.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 0.047 TL 7.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 56 -130.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.4 S5 48.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 7.7 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 41.9 0.0 0.047 TL 8.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 57 -130.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.4 S4 40.0 0.0 41.9 0.0 7.7 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 45.7 0.0 0.047 TL 8.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 58 -130.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.4 S3 32.0 0.0 45.7 0.0 7.7 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 49.6 0.0 0.047 TL 8.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 59 -130.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.4 S2 24.0 0.0 49.6 0.0 7.7 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S1 16.0 0.0 53.4 0.0 0.047 TL 8.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 60 -130.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.8 Sl 16.0 0.0 53.4 0.0 7.7 120 FTG E PE 3.5 BI 8.0 0.0 57.6 0.0 0.047 TL 16.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 61 -130.4 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 4.0 B1 8.0 0.0 57.6 0.0 7.7 120 FTG 3E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 61.6 0.0 0.047 TL 84.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 62 -130.4 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 3.2 B2 8.0 0.0 61.6 0.0 7.7 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 64.8 0.0 0.047 TL 68.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 63 -130.4 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 2.5 B3 8.0 0.0 64.8 0.0 7.7 120 FTG E PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 67.3 0.0 0.047 TL 53.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 64 -130.4 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 67.3 0.0 3.3 120 FTG ---- PE 3.0 B5 1.0 0.0 70.3 0.0 0.006 TL 5.00 PV 0.1 SPi KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA -_SIS Page 8 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 65 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE U1 1.0 0.0 73.3 0.0 3.0 psi, 130.4 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 70.3 0.0 Pipe: 66 -130.4 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 U1 1.0 0.0 73.3 0.0 1.4 140 FTG ---- PE 0.4 U2 0.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 0.001 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 67 -130.4 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.0 U2 0.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 1.4 140 FTG ---- PE 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 0.001 TL 60.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 68 -130.4 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 73.8 0.0 1.4 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 73.8 (N/A) 0.001 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 310L743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.002 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.132 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 19.1 ft/sec at pipe 17. (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly SP. TKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANI. SIS Page 9 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 - Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT-L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45-Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.505 4.00 7.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 6.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 SPSIKKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA SIS Page 10 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHASCOR.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. CORRIDOR WATER SUPPLY CURVE 1321+ I psi @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 121+ Flow Test Point 110+ 99+ P 88+ R E S S 77+ U X R E 66+ ( P S I 55+ 44+ 33+ 22+ LEGEND X = Required Water Supply " 73.85 psi @ 230.4 gpm 11+ n 0 = Available Water Supply 124.92 psi @ 230.4 gpm " tr 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FLOW (GPM) 56 vL U.S. ENGINEERING, CO 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIM SIXTH FLOOR UNIT 668 1HD lit� FILE NUMBER: MTlHD668 17 , DATE: Apr 07, 1997 -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: RESIDENTIAL PER NFPA 13 DENSITY: 28 gpm/PER/HD. AREA OF APPLICATION: 256 SQ FT PER HEAD COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 16' X 16' PER HEAD NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: 1 sprinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: 28.0 gpm TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): 128.0 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): 28 gpm @ 71.0 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: 1/2 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION # 91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 128.0 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS Date: SP 04/07/1997 1KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANS SIS Page 1 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM C:\HASS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF SIXTH FLR. UNIT WATER SUPPLY DATA 25.9 28.0 6 668 ONE HEAD SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE TAG PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. 55.0 - - - - (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 125.0 128.0 71.0 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 128.0 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 28.0 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 1 61.0 - - - - 31.0 - 2 55.0 - - - - 33.6 -_ 3 54.0 - - - - 34.1 - -- 4 55.0 - - - - 33.6 _ 5 61.0 K= 5.50 25.9 28.0 6 55.0 - - - - 30.0 - 7 55.0 - - - - 33.6 - - 8 55.0 - - - - 35.1 - - 9 55.0 - - - - 38.3 - - 10 55.0 - - - - 41.7 - - 11 54.0 - - - - 43.3 - - 12 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - 13 54.0 - - - - 43.3 - - 14 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 15 54.0 - - - - 43.3 - - - 16 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - 17 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 18 55.0 - - _ _ 42.9 - - - 19 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 20 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 21 54.0 - - - - 43.3 - - - 22 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - 23 54.0 - - - - 43.3 - - - 24 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 25 55.0 - - - - 42.9 - - 26 55.0 - - - - 43.0 - - - 27 55.0 - - - - 43.0 - - - 28 55.0 - - - - 43.1 - - 29 55.0 - _ _ _ 43.2 - - _ 30 55.0 - - - - 43.2 - - - 31 61.0 - - - - 40.6 - - - 32 61.0 - - - - 40.6 - - - 33 61.0 - - - - 40.6 - - - 34 61.0 - - - - 40.6 - - - Date: SP: 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA SIS Page 2 04/07/1997 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN C:\HASS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF HAUS CONDOMINIUM NODE TAG ELEVATION SIXTH FLR. NODE TYPE PRESSURE UNIT 668 ONE HEAD (FT) DISCHARGE (PSI) (GPM) 35 61.0 - - - - 40.6 - 36 55.0 - _ _ _ 43.2 - - - 37 55.0 - - - - 43.2 - 38 55.0 - - - - 43.2 _ - - - 39 61.0 - - _ _ 40.7 - - - 40 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 41 54.0 - - - - 43.7 - - - 42 61.0 - - _ _ 40.7 - - - 43 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 44 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - 45 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - 46 61.0 - _ _ -40.7 - -_ 47 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - 48 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 49 61.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 50 55.0 - - _ -43.3 - -_ 51 55.0 - - - - 43.3 - - 52 55.0 - - - - 43.3 - - 53 55.0 - - - - 43.3 - - 54 55.0 - ,- - - 43.3 - - 55 55.0 - - - - 43.3 - - S6 55.0 - _ _ -43.5 - _ _ S5 48.0 - - - - 46.5 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 50.0 - - S3 32.0 - - - - 53.5 - - - S2 24.0 - - - - 57.0 - - S1 16.0 - - - - 60.5 - - B1 8.0 - - - - 64.0 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 64.2 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 64.3 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 64.5 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 67.5 - - - Ul 1.0 - - - - 70.5 - - U2 0.0 - - - - 71.0 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 71.0 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 71.0 28.0 SPI KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA SIS Page 3 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 1 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 1 61.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 2 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 2 0.0 1.025 PL 4.50 PF 0.0 2 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 4 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.000 TL 4.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 3 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 3 54.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 4 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 4 0.0 1.025 PL 3.17 PF 0.0 4 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 5 -28.0 1.025 -PL 6.00 PF 1.5 5 61.0 5.5 25.9 28.0 10.9 150 FTG E PE 2.6 6 55.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.180 TL 8.50 PV 0.8 Pipe: 6 -28.0 1.025 PL 15.50 PF 3.6 6 55.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 10.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 0.180 TL 20.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 7 -28.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 1.4 7 55.0 0.0 33.6 0.0 10.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 8 55.0 0.0 35.1 0.0 0.180 TL 8.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 8 -28.0 1.025 PL 13.00 PF 3.2 8 55.0 0.0 35.1 0.0 10.9 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 9 55.0 0.0 38.3 0.0 0.180 TL 18.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 9 -28.0 1.025 PL 12.00 PF 3.4 9 55.0 0.0 38.3 0.0 10.9 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 10 55.0 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.180 TL 19.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 10 -28.0 1.265 PL 9.25 PF 1.1 10 55.0 0.0 41.7 0.0 7.1 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.064 TL 17.75 PV 0.3 Pipe: 11 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 11 54.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 12 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 12 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 12 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 13 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 13 54.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 14 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 S. :NKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ASIS Page 4 Date: 04/07/1997 r .PSIS JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 0.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 15 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 15 54.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 16 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 16 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 16 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 17 0.0 1.265 PL 1.75 PF 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 1.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 18 -28.0 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.007 TL 6.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 19 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 19 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 20 -28.0 1.985 PL 0.75 PF 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.007 TL 0.75 PV 0.1 Pipe: 21 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 21 54.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 22 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 22 0.0 1.505 PL 8.50 PF 0.0 22 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 23 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 23 54.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 24 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 24 0.0 1.505 PL 8.75 PF 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 15.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 25 -28.0 1.985 PL 7.75 PF 0.1 25 55.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 26 55.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.007 TL 7.75 PV 0.1 Pipe: 26 -28.0 1.985 PL 9.50 PF 0.1 26 55.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 27 55.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.007 TL 9.50 PV 0.1 SP' TKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN! SIS Page 5 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HK"SS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 -28.0 1.985 PL 12.67 PF 0.1 27 55.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 28 55.0 0.0 43.1 0.0 0.007 TL 12.67 PV 0.1 Pipe: 28 -28.0 1.985 PL 8.17 PF 0.1 28 55.0 0.0 43.1 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 29 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.007 TL 8.17 PV 0.1 Pipe: 29 -28.0 1.985 PL 8.00 PF 0.1 29 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 2.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.007 TL 8.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 30 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 31 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 31 0.0 1.025 PL 7.17 PF 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.000 TL 7.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 32 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 33 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 33 0.0 1.025 PL 2.00 PF 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 34 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 40.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 36 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 35 0.0 1.025 PL 10.75 PF 0.0 36 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.000 TL 15.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 36 0.0 1.265 PL 6.17 PF 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.000 TL 6.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 37 0.0 1.505 PL 5.58 PF 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 0.000 TL 12.58 PV 0.0 Pipe: 38 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 39 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 39 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 SP IKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN SIS Page 6 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 40 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 41 54.0 0.0 43.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -3.0 42 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 41 0.0 1.025 PL 22.50 PF 0.0 42 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 29.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 42 0.0 1.025 PL 3.67 PF 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.67 PV 0.0 Pipe: 43 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 44 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 44 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 45 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 46 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 46 0.0 1.025 PL 3.25 PF 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 7.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 47 0.0 1.265 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 4.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 48 0.0 1.265 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 50 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.000 TL 9.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 49 0.0 1.265 PL 19.00 PF 0.0 50 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.000 TL 22.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 50 0.0 1.505 PL 6.75 PF 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.000 TL 17.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 51 0.0 1.505 PL 5.33 PF 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.000 TL 12.33 PV 0.0 Pipe: 52 0.0 1.985 PL 9.25 PF 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.000 TL 20.25 PV 0.0 SP lKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANSIS Page 7 Date: 04/07/1997 ~- C:\ SS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 53 0.0 1.985 PL 1.25 PF 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.000 TL 10.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 53A -28.0 1.985 PL 0.50 PF 0.1 30 55.0 0.0 43.2 0.0 2.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.007 TL 9.50 PV 0.1 Pipe: 54 -28.0 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 0.1 55 55.0 0.0 43.3 0.0 2.9 120 FTG 2EG PE 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 43.5 0.0 0.011 TL 13.61 PV 0.1 Pipe: 55 -28.0 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 43.5 0.0 1.6 120 FTG ---- PE 3.0 S5 48.0 0.0 46.5 0.0 0.003 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 56 -28.0 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S5 48.0 0.0 46.5 0.0 1.6 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.003 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 57 -28.0 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S4 40.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 1.6 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 53.5 0.0 0.003 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 58 -28.0 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S3 32.0 0.0 53.5 0.0 1.6 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 0.003 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 59 -28.0 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S2 24.0 0.0 57.0 0.0 1.6 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S1 16.0 0.0 60.5 0.0 0.003 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 60 -28.0 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S1 16.0 0.0 60.5 0.0 1.6 120 FTG E PE 3.5 B1 8.0 0.0 64.0 0.0 0.003 TL 16.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 61 -28.0 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 0.2 B1 8.0 0.0 64.0 0.0 1.6 120 FTG 2E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 64.2 0.0 0.003 TL 76.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 62 -28.0 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 0.1 B2 8.0 0.0 64.2 0.0 1.6 120 FTG ---- PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 64.3 0.0 0.003 TL 51.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 63 -28.0 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 0.2 B3 8.0 0.0 64.3 0.0 1.6 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 64.5 0.0 0.003 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 64 28.0 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 B5 1.0 0.0 67.5 0.0 0.7 120 FTG ET PE -3.0 B4 8.0 0.0 64.5 0.0 0.000 TL 35.00 PV 0.0 SAWKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN SIS Page 8 i Date: 04/07/1997 C:\ SS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 65 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE U1 1.0 0.0 70.5 0.0 3.0 psi, 28.0 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 67.5 0.0 Pipe: 66 -28.0 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 U1 1.0 0.0 70.5 0.0 0.3 140 FTG E PE 0.4 U2 0.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.000 TL 30.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 67 -28.0 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.0 U2 0.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.3 140 FTG G PE 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.000 TL 65.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 68 -28.0 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.3 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 71.0 (N/A) 0.000 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 31OL743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.002 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.165 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 10.9 ft/sec at pipe 8. (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly SF NKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN !SIS Page 9 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\KASS61\MTN\MT1HD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668 ONE HEAD 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT-L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45-Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.505 4.00 7.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 6.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 jo NKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC A .YSIS Page 10 IDate: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTlHD668.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 668\ONE HHEAD -SDF WATER SUPPLY CURVE 132+ 121+ Flow 110+ 99+ P 88+ R I S I S 77+ U R X E 66+ psi @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Test Point ( II P I S I 55+ 44+ 33+ --------------- 22+ LEGEND n n X = Required Water Supply rr 70.97 psi @ 128.0 gpm �r 11+ rr 0 = Available Water Supply �r 124.97 psi @ 128.0 gpm rr 0++-+---+----+-----+------+- __________ 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FLOW (GPM) U.S. ENGINEERING, CO 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIM 5TH FLR. UNIT!' 567 FILE NUMBER: MTHAS567 DATE: Apr 07, 1997 -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: RESIDENTIAL PER NFPA 13 DENSITY: 23 GPM PER/HEAD AREA OF APPLICATION: PER\COMPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 16' X 16' PER HEAD NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: 4 sprinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: 110.8 gpm TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): 210.7 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): 110.7 gpm @ 96.16 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: 1/2 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO. INC. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION #91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SP; KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA -SIS Page 1 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 124.9 210.7 96.1 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 210.7 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 110.7 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) S6 56.0 - - - - 60.4 - - - S5 48.0 - - - - 63.9 - - - 1 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 2 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 3 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 4 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 5 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 6 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 7 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 8 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 9 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 10 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 11 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 12 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 13 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 14 48.0 - - - - 61.1 - - - 15 48.0 K= 5.50 19.0 24.0 16 48.0 - - - - 19.7 - - - 17 48.0 K= 5.50 22.0 25.8 18 48.0 - - - - 22.8 - - - 19 48.0 K= 5.50 28.6 29.4 20 48.0 - - - - 29.6 - - - 21 48.0 K= 5.50 33.0 31.6 22 48.0 - - - - 34.1 - - - 23 48.0 - - - - 50.2 - - - 24 48.0 - - - - 55.8 - - - 25 48.0 - - - - 55.8 - - - 25A 47.0 - - - - 56.2 - - - 26 48.0 - - - - 56.5 - - - 26A 47.0 - - - - 56.9 - - - 27 48.0 - - - - 57.2 - - - 27A 47.0 - - - - 57.6 - - - 28 48.0 - - - - 58.3 - - - 28A 47.0 - - - - 58.8 - - - SP; "� 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANE__ SIS Page 2 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 29 48.0 - - - - 59.4 - - - 29A 47.0 - - - - 59.8 - - - 30 0.0 - - - - 83.0 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - S3 32.0 - - - - 71.4 - - - S2. 24.0 - - - - 75.1 - - - S1 16.0 - - - 78.8 - - - Bl 8.0 - - - - 82.9 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 85.5 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 87.3 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 89.5 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 92.6 - - - Ul 1.0 - - -- - 95.6 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 96.1 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 96.1 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 96.1 110.7 S7 NKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC Ah ASIS Page 3 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) :i Pipe: 1 0.0 1.025 PL 7.75 PF 0.0 i 1 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 3E PE 0.0 2 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 15.25 PV 0.0 .' Pipe: 2 p 0.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 2 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 4 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 3 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 3 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 4 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 4 0.0 1.025 PL 2.33 PF 0.0 4 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 5 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 6.83 PV 0.0 Pipe: 5 0.0 1.025 PL 4.50 PF 0.0 6 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 9 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 9.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 6 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 7 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 8 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 3.•50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 7 0.0 1.025 PL 2.33 PF 0.0 8 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 9 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 2.33 PV 0.0 5 Pipe: 8 0.0 1.025 PL 5.75 PF 0.0 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 9 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 10.25 PV 0.0 5 Pipe: 9 0.0 1.025 PL 11.75 PF 0.0 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 12 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 11.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 10 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 10 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 11 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 1..00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 11 0.0 1.025 PL 2.33 PF 0.0 11 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 12 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 6.83 PV 0.0 Pipe: 12 0.0 1.265 PL 8.25 PF 0.0 12 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 13 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 13.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 13 0.0 1.985 PL 2.75 PF 0.0 13 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 14 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 0.000 TL 11.75 PV 0.0 Sl NKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN. 'SIS Page 4 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 -110.8 1.985 PL 2.00 PF 1.1 14 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 11.5 120 FTG T PE 20.8 30 0.0 0.0 83.0 0.0 0.138 TL 7.96 PV 0.9 Pipe: 15 0.1 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.0 S6 56.0 0.0 60.4 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S5 48.0 0.0 63.9 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 16 -110.8 1.985 PL 3.50 PF 1.7 30 0.0 0.0 83.0 0.0 11.5 150 FTG ETG PE -20.8 S5 48.0 0.0 63.9 0.0 0.092 TL 18.50 PV 0.9 Pipe: 17 -24.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.7 15 48.0 5.5 19.0 24.0 9.3 150 FTG T PE 0.0 16 48.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.135 TL 5.00 PV 0.6 Pipe: 18 -24.0 1.025 PL 17.75 PF 3.1 16 48.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 9.3 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 18 48.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.135 TL 22.75 PV 0.6 Pipe: 19 -25.8 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.8 17 48.0 5.5 22.0 25.8 10.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 18 48.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.154 TL 5.00 PV 0.7 Pipe: 20 -49.8 1.025 PL 8.00 PF 6.8 18 48.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 19.4 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 20 48.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.521 TL 13.00 PV 2.5 Pipe: 21 -29.4 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 1.0 19 48.0 5.5 28.6 29.4 11.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 20 48.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.197 TL 5.00 PV 0.9 Pipe: 22 -79.2 1.265 PL 7.25 PF 4.5 20 48.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 20.2 150 FTG E PE 0.0 22 48.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 0.441 TL 10.25 PV 2.8 Pipe: 23 -31.6 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 1.1 21 48.0 5.5 33.0 31.6 12.3 150 FTG T PE 0.0 22 48.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 0.224 TL 5.00 PV 1.0 Pipe: 24 -110.8 1.505 PL 33.83 PF 16.2 22 48.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 20.0 150 FTG 3E PE 0.0 23 48.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 0.352 TL 45.83 PV 2.7 Pipe: 25 -110.8 1.505 PL 8.75 PF 5.6 23 48.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 20.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 24 48.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.352 TL 15.75 PV 2.7 Pipe: 26 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 25 48.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.4 25A 47.0 0.0 56.2 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 1 SP ;KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANE._ SIS Page 5 A Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 0.0 1.505 PL 0.75 PF 0.0 24 48.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 25 48.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.000 TL 0.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 28 -110.8 1.985 PL 7.50 PF 0.7 24 48.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 11.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 26 48.0 0.0 56.5 0.0 0.092 TL 7.50 PV 0.9 Pipe: 29 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 26 48.0 0.0 56.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.4 26A 47.0 0.0 56.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 30 -110.8 1.985 PL 8.00 PF 0.7 26 48.0 0.0 56.5 0.0 11.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 27 48.0 0.0 57.2 0.0 0.092 TL 8.00 PV 0.9 Pipe: 31 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 27 48.0 0.0 57.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.4 27A 47.0 0.0 57.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 32 -110.8 1.985 PL 12.25 PF 1.1 27 48.0 0.0 57.2 0.0 11.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 28 48.0 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.092 TL 12.25 PV 0.9 Pipe: 33 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 28 48.0 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.4 28A 47.0 0.0 58.8 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 34 -110.8 1.985 PL 11.25 PF 1.0 28 48.0 0.0 58.3 0.0 11.5 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 29 48.0 0.0 59.4 0.0 0.092 TL 11.25 PV 0.9 Pipe: 35 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 29 48.0 0.0 59.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.4 29A 47.0 0.0 59.8 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 36 110.8 1.985 PL 9.75 PF 1.7 14 48.0 0.0 61.1 0.0 11.5 150 FTG T PE 0.0 29 48.0 0.0 59.4 0.0 0.092 TL 18.75 PV 0.9 Pipe: 37 -110.8 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.3 S5 48.0 0.0 63.9 0.0 6.5 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.035 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 38 -110.8 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.3 S4 40.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 6.5 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 71.4 0.0 0.035 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 39 -110.8 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.3 S3 32.0 0.0 71.4 0.0 6.5 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 75.1 0.0 0.035 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Date: SPI KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA _ 3IS Page 6 04/07/1997 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF FLOOR PIPE DATA (cont.) UNIT 567 PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) S2 Pipe: 40 -110.8 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.3 S1 24.0 0.0 75.1 0.0 6.5 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 16.0 0.0 78.8 0.0 0.035 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 S1 Pipe: 41 -110.8 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.6 16.0 0.0 78.8 0.0 6.5 120 FTG E PE 3.5 B1 8.0 0.0 82.9 0.0 0.035 TL 16.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 42 -110.8 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 2.6 B1 8.0 0.0 82.9 0.0 6.5 120 FTG 2E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 85.5 0.0 0.035 TL 76.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 43 -110.8 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 1.8 B2 8.0 0.0 85.5 0.0 6.5 120 FTG ---- PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 0.035 TL 51.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 44 -1.10.8 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 2.2 B3 8.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 6.5 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 89.5 0.0 0.035 TL 62.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 45 -110.8 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.2 B4 8.0 0.0 89.5 0.0 2.8 120 FTG ET PE 3.0 B5 1.0 0.0 92.6 0.0 0.004 TL 35.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 46 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE U1 1.0 0.0 95.6 0.0 3.0 psi, 110.8 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 92.6 0.0 Pipe: 47 -110.8 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 U1 1.0 0.0 95.6 0.0 1.1 140 FTG E PE 0.4 U2 0.0 0.0 96.1 0.0 0.000 TL 30.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 48 -110.8 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.0 U2 0.0 0.0 96.1 0.0 1.1 140 FTG G PE 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 96.1 0.0 0.000 TL 65.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 49 -110.7 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 96.1 0.0 1.1 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 96.1 (N/A) 0.000 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 31OL743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.004 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.197 gpm. SP'.-KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA_ SIS Page 7 Date: 04/07/1997C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 20.2 ft/sec at pipe 22. (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT -L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45 -Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.505 4.00 7.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 6.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 7 SF 4KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN: SIS Page 8 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS567.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS FIFTH FLOOR UNIT 567 WATER SUPPLY CURVE 132+ I psi @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 121+ Flow Test Point 110+ 99+ 91 P 88+ R E S S 77+ U R E 66+ P S I 55+ 44+ 33+ 22+ LEGEND " n X = Required Water Supply " 96.13 psi @ 210.7 gpm " 11+ n 0 = Available Water Supply 124.93 psi @ 210.7 gpm " 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FLOW (GPM) U.S. ENGINEERING, CO 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIM @ VAIL SIXTH FLR. RM 664 FILE NUMBER: MTHAS664 DATE: Apr 07, 1997 -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: RESIDENTIAL PER NFPA 13 DENSITY: 23 GPM PER\HEAD AREA OF APPLICATION: PER\COMPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 16' X 16' PER HEAD NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: 4 sprinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: 103.9 gpm TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): 203.9 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): 103.9 gpm @ 104.2 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: 5.5 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET # 91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SP: KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA _ 3IS Page 1 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 124.9 203.9 104.2 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 203.9 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 103.9 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 1 61.0 - - - - 65.0 - - - 2 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 3 54.0 - - - - 68.0 - - - 4 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 5 61.0 - - - - 65.0 - - - 6 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 7 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 8 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 9 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 10 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 11 54.0 - - - - 68.0 - - - 12 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 13 54.0 - - - - 68.0 - - - 14 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 15 54.0 - - - - 68.0 - - - 16 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 17 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 18 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 19 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 20 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 21 54.0 - - - - 68.0 - - - 22 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 23 54.0 - - - - 68.0 - - - 24 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 25 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 26 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 27 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 28 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 29 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 30 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 31 61.0 - - - - 65.0 - - - 32 61.0 - - - - 65.0 - - - 33 61.0 - - - - 65.0 - - - 34 61.0 - - - - 65.0 - - - SP: Date: 04/07/1997 ;KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA _ .3IS Page 2 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF SIXTH FLR. NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE UNIT 664 DISCHARGE` (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 35 61.0 - - - - - - - 3665.0 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 37 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - - 38 55.0 - - - - 67.6 39 40 61.0 K= 5.50 21.1 25.2 61.0 - - - - 21.9 41 42 60.0 K= 5.60 18.4 24.0 61.0 - - - - 18.4 - - - 43 61.0 - - - - 22.4 44 61.0 K= 5.50 23.4 26.6 45 61.0 - - - - 24.3 46 61.0 K= 5.50 26.0 28.0 47 61.0 - - - - 26.5 - - - 48 61.0 - - - - 27.9 - - - 49 61.0 - - - - 31.6 - - - 50 55.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 51 55.0 - - - - 55.7 - - - 52 55.0 - - - - 61.3 - - - 53 55.0 - - - - 65.1 - 54 55.0 - - - - 66.8 - - - 55 55.0 - - - - 67.6 - - S6 55.0 - - - - 69.3 - - S5 48.0 - - - - 72.5 - - S4 40.0 - - - - 76.2 - - S3 32.0 - - - - 79.9 - - S2 24.0 - - - - 83.7 - - Sl 16.0 - - - - 87.4 - - Bl 8.0 - - - - 91.3 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 93.9 - - - B3 8.0 - -- - - 96.0 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 97.7 B5 1.0 - - - - 100.7 - - - Ul 1.0 - - - - 103.7 -- - - U2 0.0 - - - - 104.2 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 104.2 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 104.2 103.9 Ila Date: 04/07/1997 SP1 •KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA _ 3IS Page 3 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF HAUS CONDOMINIUM PIPE DATA SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 PIPE TAG ' END ELEV. NOZ. Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. NODES (FT) (K) PT (PSI) DISC. (GPM) VEL(FPS) HW(C) F.L./FT (FT) SUM. (PSI) 1 Pipe: 1 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 2 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 2 2 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.025 PL 4.50 PF 0.0 4 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 150 FTG 0.000 TL ---- 4.50 PE PV 0.0 0.0 3 Pipe: 3 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 4 54.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 4 Pipe: 4 0.0 1.025 PL 3.17 PF 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.17 PV 0.0 5 Pipe: 5 _ 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 6 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 6 Pipe: 6 0.0 1.025 PL 15.50 PF 0.0 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 7 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 20.00 PV 0.0 7 Pipe: 7 0.0 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 8 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 8 0.0 1.025 PL 13.00 PF 0.0 8 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 9 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 18.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 9 0.0 1.025 PL 12.00 PF 0.0 9 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 10 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 19.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 10 0.0 1.265 PL 9.25 PF 0.0 10 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 17.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 11 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 11 54.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 12 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 12 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 12 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 13 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 13 54.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 14 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 SP' JKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANE. SIS Page 4 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 0.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 14 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 15 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 15 54.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 16 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 16 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 16 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 17 0.0 1.265 PL 1.75 PF 0.0 17 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 1.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 18 0.0 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 18 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 19 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 19 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 20 0.0 1.985 PL 0.75 PF 0.0 20 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 0.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 21 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 21 54.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 22 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 22 0.0 1.505 PL 8.50 PF 0.0 22 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 23 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 23 54.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 24 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 24 0.0 1.505 PL 8.75 PF 0.0 24 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 15.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 25 0.0 1.985 PL 7.75 PF 0.0 25 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 26 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 7.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 26 0.0 1.985 PL 9.50 PF 0.0 26 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 27 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 SPF KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAIS Page 5 Date: 04/07/1997 C.\HA S61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 0.0 1.985 PL 12.67 PF 0.0 27 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 28 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 12.67 PV 0.0 Pipe: 28 0.0 1.985 PL 8.17 PF 0.0 28 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 29 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 29 0.0 1.985 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 29 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 30 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 31 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 31 0.0 1.025 PL 7.17 PF 0.0 32 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.000 TL 7.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 32 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 33 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 33 0.0 1.025 PL 2.00 PF 0.0 34 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 34 0.0 1.025 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 35 61.0 0.0 65.0 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 2.6 36 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 10.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 35 0.0 1.025 PL 10.75 PF 0.0 36 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 15.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 36 0.0 1.265 PL 6.17 PF 0.0 37 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 6.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 37 0.0 1.505 PL 5.58 PF 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 38 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 12.58 PV 0.0 Pipe: 38 -25.2 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.8 39 61.0 5.5 21.1 25.2 9.8 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 40 61.0 0.0 21.9 0.0 0.148 TL 5.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 39 -25.2 1.025 PL 3.50 PF 0.5 40 61.0 0.0 21.9 0.0 9.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.148 TL 3.50 PV 0.6 SP lKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANS SIS Page 6 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 40 -24.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.5 41 60.0 5.6 18.4 24.0 9.3 150 FTG E PE -0.4 42 61.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 0.135 TL 3.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 41 -24.0 1.025 PL 22.50 PF 4.0 42 61.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 9.3 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 43 61.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.135 TL 29.50 PV 0.6 Pipe: 42 -49.2 1.025 PL 3.67 PF 1.9 43 61..0 0.0 22.4 0.0 19.1 150 FTG PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 24.3 0.0 0.510 TL 3.67 PV 2.5 Pipe: 43 -26.6 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.8 44 61.0 5.5 23.4 26.6 10.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 45 61.0 0.0 24.3 0.0 0.164 TL 5.00 PV 0.7 Pipe: 44 -75.9 1.265 PL 3.50 PF 3.7 45 61..0 0.0 24.3 0.0 19.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.408 TL 9.00 PV 2.5 Pipe: 45 -28.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.5 46 61.0 5.5 26.0 28.0 10.9 150 FTG E PE 0.0 47 61.0 0.0 26.5 0.0 0.180 TL 3.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 46 -28.0 1.025 PL 3.25 PF 1.4 47 61.0 0.0 26.5 0.0 10.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 48 61.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.180 TL 7.75 PV 0.8 Pipe: 47 -103.9 1.265 PL 2.00 PF 3.6 48 61.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 26.5 150 FTG E PE 0.0 49 61.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.729 TL 5.00 PV 4.7 Pipe: 48 -103.9 1.265 PL 6.00 PF 6.6 49 61.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 26.5 150 FTG E PE 2.6 50 55.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.729 TL 9.00 PV 4.7 Pipe: 49 -103.9 1.265 PL 17.50 PF 15.0 50 55.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 26.5 150 FTG E PE 0.0 51 55.0 0.0 55.7 0.0 0.729 TL 20.50 PV 4.7 Pipe: 50 -103.9 1.505 PL 6.75 PF 5.6 51 55.0 0.0 55.7 0.0 18.7 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 52 55.0 0.0 61.3 0.0 0.313 TL 17.75 PV 2.4. Pipe: 51 -103.9 1.505 PL 5.33 PF 3.9 52 55.0 0.0 61.3 0.0 18.7 150 FTG T PE 0.0 53 55.0 0.0 65.1 0.0 0.313 TL 12.33 PV 2.4 Pipe: 52 -103.9 1.985 PL 9.25 PF 1.6 53 55.0 0.0 65.1 0.0 10.8 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 54 55.0 0.0 66.8 0.0 0.081 TL 20.25 PV 0.8 SPF KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA 3IS Page 7 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 53 -103.9 1.985 PL 1.25 PF 0.8 54 55.0 0.0 66.8 0.0 10.8 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.081 TL 10.25 PV 0.8 Pipe: 53A 0.0 1.985 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 30 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 55 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 54 -103.9 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 1.7 55 55.0 0.0 67.6 0.0 10.8 120 FTG 2EG PE 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 69.3 0.0 0.123 TL 13.61 PV 0.8 Pipe: 55 -103.9 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.2 S6 55.0 0.0 69.3 0.0 6.1 120 FTG PE 3.0 S5 48.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 0.031 TL 7.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 56 -103..9 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S5 48.0 0.0 72.5 0.0 6.1 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 76.2 0.0 0.031 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 57 -103.9 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S4 40.0 0.0 76.2 0.0 6.1 120 FTG PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 79.9 0.0 0.031 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 58 -103.9 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S3 32.0 0.0 79.9 0.0 6.1 120 FTG PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 83.7 0.0 0.031 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 59 -103.9 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.2 S2 24.0 0.0 83.7 0.0 6.1 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S1 16.0 0.0 87.4 0.0 0.031 TL 8.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 60 -103.9 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.5 Sl 16.0 0.0 87.4 0.0 6.1 120 FTG E PE 3.5 Bl 8.0 0.0 91.3 0.0 0.031 TL 16.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 61 -103.9 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 2.6 Bl 8.0 0.0 91.3 0.0 6.1 120 FTG 3E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 93.9 0.0 0.031 TL 84.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 62 -103.9 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 2.1 B2 8.0 0.0 93.9 0.0 6.1 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 96.0 0.0 0.031 TL 68.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 63 -103.9 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 1.6 B3 8.0 0.0 96.0 0.0 6.1 120 FTG E PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 97.7 0.0 0.031 TL 53.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 64 -103.9 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 97.7 0.0 2.6 120 FTG PE 3.0 B5 1.0 0.0 100.7 0.0 0.004 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 SP' iKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANe _ SIS Date: 04/07/1997 --- Page 8 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT \ 64\M`I' 5664.SDF PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 65 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE U1 1.0 0.0 103.7 0.0 3.0 psi, 103.9 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 100.7 0.0 Pipe: 66 --103.9 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 U1 1.0 0.0 103.7 0.0 1.1 140 FTG U2 0.0 0.0 104.2 0.0 ---- PE 0.4 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 67 -•103.9 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.0 U2 0.0 0.0 104.2 0.0 1.1 140 FTG U3 0.0 0.0 104.2 0,0 -_-- PE 0.0 0.000 TL 60.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 68 -103.9 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 104.2 0.0 1.1 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 104.2 (N/A) 0.000 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 310L743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.001 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.099 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 26.5 ft/sec at pipe 47. (4) PIPE FITTINGS 'TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.0.0 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly SPR ;LER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAI IS Page 9 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HAgS61\MTN\MTHAS664.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT 664 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT-L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45-Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.505 4.00 7.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 6.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 SP Date: 04/07/1997 JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN WATER SUPPLY CURVE 132+ YKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC AN. SIS Page 10 HAUS CONDOMINIUM SIXTH FLR. UNIT\664\MTHAS664,SDF psi 121+ Flow Test 110+ X 99+ P 88+ R E S S 77+ U R E 66+ P S 155+ @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Point 44+ 33+ --------------- 22+ LEGEND n n X = Required Water Supply rr 104.19 psi @ 203.9 gpm rr 11+ rr 0 = Available Water Supply rr 124.94 psi @ 203.9 gpm rr rr 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+--------- 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 -+ 1000 FLOW (GPM) U.S. ENGINEERING, CO 729 S.E. 8TH STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO 80537 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIM 1ST FLR. OFFICE AREA FILE NUMBER: MTHASOFF DATE: Apr 07, 1997 -DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: DENSITY: AREA OF APPLICATION: COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: LIGHT \ HAZARD OFFICE 18 gpm/per/hd. LARGE RM. REQ'D 1 COMPLETE OFFICE RM 105 CALC'D 14 X 14 PER HD. 10 sprinklers 238.4 gpm 338.4 gpm 238.4 gpm @ 103.0 psi 5.5 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION # 91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SPRI ,ER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL: S Page 1 Date: 04/07/1997 w- C:\HAS5dl\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 124.8 338.4 103.0 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 338.4 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 100.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 238.4 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) S6 55.0 - - - - 45.9 - - - S5 48.0 - - - - 48.9 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 52.4 - - - S3 32.0 - - - - 55.8 - - - S2 24.0 - - - - 59.3 - - - S1 16.0 - - - - 62.8 - - - S1A 16.0 - - - - 83.3 - - - 48 16.0 - - - - 51.8 - - - 49 16.0 - - - - 56.0 - - - 55 15.0 K= 5.50 10.8 18.1 56 15.0 - - - - 11.0 - - - 57 15.0 K= 5.50 10.7 18.0 58 15.0 - - - - 11.1 - - - 59 15.0 K= 5.50 12.5 19.5 60 15.0 - - - - 13.0 - - - 61 15.0 K= 5.50 17.5 23.0 62 15.0 - - - - 18.1 - - - 63 15.0 K= 5.50 15.6 21.7 64 15.0 K= 5.50 15.6 21.7 65 15.0 - - - - 16.2 - - - 66 15.0 - - - - 19.2 - - - 67 15.0 K= 5.50 26.2 28.1 68 15.0 - - - - 27.1 - - - 69 15.0 K= 5.50 27.6 28.9 70 15.0 - - - - 28.6 - - - 71 15.0 K= 5.50 29.0 29.6 72 15.0 - - - - 30.0 - - - 73 15.0 K= 5.50 29.3 29.8 74 15.0 - - - - 30.3 - - - 75 15.0 - - - - 36.5 - - - 76 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 77 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 78 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 79 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - SPRI: ,ER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALY 3 Page 2 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS1\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 80 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 81 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 82 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 83 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 84 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 85 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 86 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 87 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 88 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 89 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 90 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 91 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 92 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 93 15.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 94 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 95 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 96 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 97 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 98 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 99 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 100 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 101 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 102 14.5 - - - - 48.4 - - - 103 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 104 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 105 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 106 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - 107 15.0 - - - - 48.2 - - - Bl 8.0 - - - - 68.5 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 79.4 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 86.8 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 95.7 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 99.4 - - - U1 1.0 - - - - 102.4 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 102.8 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 102.9 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 103.0 238.4 SPRI IER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL`. S Page 3 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASSbl\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 1 0.0 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 45.9 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.0 S5 48.0 0.0 48.9 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 2 0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S5 48.0 0.0 48.9 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 52.4 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 3 -0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S4 40.0 0.0 52.4 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 4 0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S3 32.0 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 5 -0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S2 24.0 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 Sl 16.0 0.0 62.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 6 0.0 2.635 PL 15.00 PF 0.0 S1A 16.0 0.0 83.3 0.0 0.0 120 FTG E2T PE 3.5 B3 8.0 0.0 86.8 0.0 0.000 TL 57.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 7 -238.4 1.985 PL 17.00 PF 6.4 75 15.0 0.0 36.5 0.0 24.7 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 93 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.378 TL 17.00 PV 4.1 Pipe: 8 -238.4 1.985 PL 14.00 PF 5.3 93 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 24.7 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 107 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.378 TL 14.00 PV 4.1 Pipe: 9 238.4 1.985 PL 1.67 PF 4.0 48 16.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 24.7 150 FTG T PE 0.4 107 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.378 TL 10.67 PV 4.1 Pipe: 10 -238.4 1.985 PL 2.00 PF 4.2 48 16.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 24.7 150 FTG T PE 0.0 49 16.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.378 TL 11.00 PV 4.1 Pipe: 11 -238.4 2.067 PL 3.50 PF 6.8 49 16.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 22.8 120 FTG 2EG PE 0.0 S1 16.0 0.0 62.8 0.0 0.469 TL 14.50 PV 3.5 Pipe: 12 -238.4 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 2.3 Sl 16.0 0.0 62.8 0.0 14.0 120 FTG E PE 3.5 Bl 8.0 0.0 68.5 0.0 0.144 TL 16.00 PV 1.3 Pipe: 13 -238.4 2.635 PL 60.00 PF 10.9 Bl 8.0 0.0 68.5 0.0 14.0 120 FTG 2E PE 0.0 B2 8.0 0.0 79.4 0.0 0.144 TL 76.00 PV 1.3 SPRI SER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL` S Page 4 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HAS561\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 -238.4 2.635 PL 51.00 PF 7.3 B2 8.0 0.0 79.4 0.0 14.0 120 FTG ---- PE 0.0 B3 8.0 0.0 86.8 0.0 0.144 TL 51.00 PV 1.3 Pipe: 15 -238.4 2.635 PL 45.00 PF 8.9 B3 8.0 0.0 86.8 0.0 14.0 120 FTG T PE 0.0 B4 8.0 0.0 95.7 0.0 0.144 TL 62.00 PV 1.3 Pipe: 16 -238.4 4.026 PL 5.00 PF 0.6 B4 8.0 0.0 95.7 0.0 6.0 120 FTG ET PE 3.0 B5 1.0 0.0 99.4 0.0 0.018 TL 35.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 17 FIXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE Ul 1.0 0.0 102.4 0.0 3.0 psi, 238.4 gpm B5 1.0 0.0 99.4 0.0 Pipe: 18 -238.4 6.280 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 Ul 1.0 0.0 102.4 0.0 2.5 140 FTG E PE 0.4 U2 0.0 0.0 102.8 0.0 0.002 TL 30.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 19 -238.4 6.280 PL 60.00 PF 0.1 U2 0.0 0.0 102.8 0.0 2.5 140 FTG G PE 0.0 U3 0.0 0.0 102.9 0.0 0.002 TL 65.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 20 -238.4 6.280 PL 10.00 PF 0.1 U3 0.0 0.0 102.9 0.0 2.5 140 FTG T PE 0.0 U4 0.0 SRCE 103.0 (N/A) 0.002 TL 62.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 21 -18.1 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.2 55 15.0 5.5 10.8 18.1 7.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 56 15.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.080 TL 3.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 22 -18.1 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.1 56 15.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 7.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 58 15.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.080 TL 1.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 23 -18.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.4 57 15.0 5.5 10.7 18.0 7.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 58 15.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.079 TL 5.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 24 -36.1 1.025 PL 6.50 PF 1.9 58 15.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 14.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 60 15.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.287 TL 6.50 PV 1.3 Pipe: 25 -19.5 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.5 59 15.0 5.5 12.5 19.5 7.6 150 FTG T PE 0.0 60 15.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.092 TL 5.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 26 -55.5 1.025 PL 5.58 PF 5.1 60 15.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 21.6 150 FTG E PE 0.0 62 15.0 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.637 TL 8.08 PV 3.1 SPRI SER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL. S Page 5 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HAS7S61\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 -23.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.6 61 15.0 5.5 17.5 23.0 8.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 62 15.0 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.125 TL 5.00 PV 0.5 Pipe: 28 -78.5 1.265 PL 2.50 PF 1.1 62 15.0 0.0 18.1 0.0 20.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 66 15.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 0.434 TL 2.50 PV 2.7 Pipe: 29 -21.7 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.6 63 15.0 5.5 15.6 21.7 8.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 65 15.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.112 TL 5.00 PV 0.5 Pipe: 30 -21.7 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.6 64 15.0 5.5 15.6 21.7 8.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 65 15.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.112 TL 5.00 PV 0.5 Pipe: 31 -43.5 1.025 PL 3.00 PF 3.0 65 15.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 16.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 66 15.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 0.405 TL 7.50 PV 1.9 Pipe: 32 -122.0 1.265 PL 8.00 PF 7.9 66 15.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 31.1 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 68 15.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.981 TL 8.00 PV 6.5 Pipe: 33 -28.1 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.9 67 15.0 5.5 26.2 28.1 10.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 68 15.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.181 TL 5.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 34 -150.1 1.505 PL 2.50 PF 1.5 68 15.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 27.1 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 70 15.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.618 TL 2.50 PV 4.9 Pipe: 35 -28.9 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 1.0 69 15.0 5.5 27.6 28.9 11.2 150 FTG T PE 0.0 70 15.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.191 TL 5.00 PV 0.9 Pipe: 36 -179.0 1.985 PL 6.17 PF 1.4 70 15.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 18.6 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 72 15.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.222 TL 6.17 PV 2.3 Pipe: 37 -29.6 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 1.0 71 15.0 5.5 29.0 29.6 11.5 150 FTG T PE 0.0 72 15.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.199 TL 5.00 PV 0.9 Pipe: 38 -208.6 1.985 PL 1.00 PF 0.3 72 15.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 21.6 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 74 15.0 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.295 TL 1.00 PV 3.1 Pipe: 39 -29.8 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 1.0 73 15.0 5.5 29.3 29.8 11.6 150 FTG T PE 0.0 74 15.0 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.201 TL 5.00 PV 0.9 SPRI SER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL Page 6 Date: 04/07/1997 '� C:\HAS,,61\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 40 -238.4 1.985 PL 7.50 PF 6.2 74 15.0 0.0 30.3 0.0 24.7 150 FTG T PE 0.0 75 15.0 0.0 36.5 0.0 0.378 TL 16.50 PV 4.1 Pipe: 41 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 76 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 78 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 42 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 77 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0- 78 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 43 0.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 78 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 80 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 44 0.0 1.025 PL 1.50 PF 0.0 79 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 80 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 4.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 45 0.0 1.025 PL 5.75 PF 0.0 80 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 82 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 10.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 46 0.0 1.025 PL 9.75 PF 0.0 81 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2ET PE 0.0 82 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 19.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 47 0.0 1.025 PL 5.50 PF 0.0 82 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 84 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 48 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 83 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 84 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 49 0.0 1.025 PL 15.50 PF 0.0 84 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 86 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 22.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 50 0.0 1.025 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 85 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2ET PE 0.0 86 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 17.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 51 0.0 1.265 PL 1.75 PF 0.0 86 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 88 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 7.25 PV 0.0 Pipe: 52 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 87 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 88 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 SPRI SER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL! S Page 7 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HAST61\MTN\MTHASOFF. JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 53 0.0 1.505 PL 3.50 PF 0.0 88 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 90 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 54 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 89 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 90 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 55 0.0 1.505 PL 10.00 PF 0.0 90 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 92 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 14.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 56 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 91 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 92 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 57 0.0 1.505 PL 8.75 PF 0.0 92 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 93 15.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.000 TL 15.75 PV 0.0 Pipe: 58 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 94 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 96 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 59 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 95 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 96 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 60 0.0 1.025 PL 13.50 PF 0.0 96 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 98 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 18.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 61 0.0 1.025 PL 4.58 PF 0.0 97 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 98 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 4.58 PV 0.0 Pipe: 62 0.0 1.025 PL 9.50 PF 0.0 98 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 99 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 63 0.0 1.025 PL 8.58 PF 0.0 99 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 105 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 8.58 PV 0.0 Pipe: 64 0.0 1.025 PL 7.50 PF 0.0 100 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG 2E PE 0.2 102 14.5 0.0 48.4 0.0 0.000 TL 12.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 65 0.0 1.025 PL 0.50 PF 0.0 101 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.2 102 14.5 0.0 48.4 0.0 0.000 TL 5.00 PV 0.0 SPRI "ER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL` S Pac Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS-61\MTN\MTHA� JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PF END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 66 0.0 1.025 PL 2.00 PF 0.0 102 14.5 0.0 48.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE -0.2 104 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 2.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 67 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 103 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 104 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 68 0.0 1.025 PL 4.67 PF 0.0 104 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 105 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 9.17 PV 0.0 Pipe: 69 0.0 1.505 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 105 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 106 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 70 0.0 1.505 PL 6.75 PF 0.0 106 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 107 15.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.000 TL 13.75 PV 0.0 NOTES: (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.1.0 computer program under license no. 310L743 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.001 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.052 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 31.1 ft/sec at pipe 32. SPRIf&ER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALS S Page 9 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\HASS-b1\MTN\MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 2.067 5.00 10.00 3.00 11.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 PAGE: B MATERIAL: THNWL HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly AlmChk DPVly 2.635 8.00 17.00 6.00 19.00 10.00 1.00 14.00 14.00 PAGE: D MATERIAL: DIRON HWC: 140 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly 6.280 24.00 52.00 16.00 55.00 17.00 5.00 PAGE: L MATERIAL: CT-L HWC: 150 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T F R C S G Ell Tee 45-Ell TeeRun Couplg SwgChk GatVly 1.025 2.50 4.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 4.50 0.50 1.265 3.00 5.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 5.50 0.50 1.505 4.00 7.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 6.50 0.50 1.985 5.50 9.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 9.00 0.50 SPRI "ER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAL. Page 10 Date: 04/07/1997 C: HAS MTN \ \ \MTHASOFF.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR OFFICE UNIT 105 WATER SUPPLY CURVE 132+ psi @ 900 gpm-> *\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 121+ Flow Test Point 110+ 91 99+ P 88+ R E S S 77+ U R E 66+ P S I 55+ 44+ 33+ 22+ LEGEND " X = Required Water Supply " 103.03 psi @ 338.4 gpm " 11+ 0 = Available Water Supply 124.84 psi @ 338.4 gpm " 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FLOW (GPM) HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDOMINIM 1ST FLR. RECEPTION & OFFICE AREA Fi-Y, FILE NUMBER: MTHASREC., DATE: Apr 07, 1997 �'• 17 912 �• F•.o; -DESIGN DATA- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: DENSITY: AREA OF APPLICATION: COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: LIGHT \ HAZARD OFFICE .10 gpm/sq. ft. ENTIRE RECEP. PLUS OFFICE AREA 1500 SQ. FT. 156 SQ. FT. MAX PER HD. 14 sprinklers 372.4 gpm 622.4 gpm 372.4 gpm @ 105.0 psi 5.5 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: U.S. ENGINEERING CO. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: GARY MONTOYA AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: VAIL FIRE AUTHORITY CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NICET CERTIFICATION # 91701 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA SPF 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA 3IS Page 1 11 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\Hr%,jS61\MTN\MTHASREC.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR RECEPTION AREA WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS. PRESS. @ PRESS. @ DEMAND PRESS. TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) U4 125.0 124.0 900.0 124.5 622.4 105.0 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 622.4 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 250.0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 0.0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 372.4 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) S6 55.0 - - - - 44.5 - - - S5 48.0 - - - - 47.5 - - - S4 40.0 - - - - 51.0 - - - S3 32.0 - - - - 54.4 - - - S2 24.0 - - - - 57.9 - - - S1 16.0 - - - - 61.4 - - - S1A 16.0 - - - - 66.8 - - - 1 15.0 K= 5.50 31.0 30.6 2 15.0 K= 5.50 32.2 31.2 3 15.0 K= 5.50 40.2 34.9 4 15.0 K= 5.50 48.2 38.2 5 15.0 K= 5.50 33.7 31.9 6 15.0 K= 5.50 35.6 32.8 7 15.0 - - - - 52.5 - - - 10 16.0 - - - - 31.3 - - - 11 16.0 - - - - 33.0 - - - 12 16.0 - - - - 41.2 - - - 13 16.0 - - - - 49.5 - - - 14 16.0 - - - - 34.0 - - - 15 16.0 - - - - 36.4 - - - 16 16.0 - - - - 52.1 - - - 20 24.0 K= 5.50 9.6 17.0 21 24.0 K= 5.50 10.6 17.9 22 24.0 K= 5.50 13.3 20.0 23 24.0 - - - - 15.0 - - - 24 16.0 - - - - 20.9 - - - 25 15.0 K= 5.50 23.1 26.5 26 16.0 - - - - 23.6 - - - 27 24.0 K= 5.50 12.1 19.1 28 24.0 K= 5.50 13.4 20.1 29 24.0 K= 5.50 16.7 22.5 30 24.0 - - - - 18.8 - - - 31 16.0 - - - - 25.3 - - - 32 16.0 - - - - 27.3 - - - SPF 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA" ;IS Page 2 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\H&.oS61\MTN\MTHASREC.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR RECEPTION AREA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 33 15.0 K= 5.50 29.2 29.7 34 16.0 - - - - 29.9 - - - 35 16.0 - - - - 32.1 - - - 36 15.0 - - - - 35.4 - - - 37 16.0 - - - - 34.9 - - - 38 15.0 - - - - 37.3 - - - 39 16.0 - - - - 36.8 - - - 40 15.0 - - - - 41.1 - - - 41 16.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 42 15.0 - - - - 41.1 - - - 43 16.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 44 15.0 - - - - 41.1 - - - 45 16.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 46 16.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 47 16.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 48 16.0 - - - - 52.8 - - - 49 16.0 - - - - 58.3 - - - 50 16.0 - - - - 56.9 - - - 51 16.0 - - - - 57.3 - - - 52 16.0 - - - - 60.3 - - -. B1 8.0 - - - - 66.1 - - - B2 8.0 - - - - 72.1 - - - B3 8.0 - - - - 76.2 - - - B4 8.0 - - - - 96.5 - - - B5 1.0 - - - - 101.0 - - - U1 1.0 - - - - 104.0 - - - U2 0.0 - - - - 104.5 - - - U3 0.0 - - - - 104.8 - - - U4 0.0 SOURCE 105.0 372.4 SPP- 'KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANAT ,IS Page 3. Date: 04/07/1997 C:\Hi -i61\MTN\MTHASREC.SDF ; JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR RECEPTION AREA PIPE DATA, ¢=; PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 1 0.0 2.635 PL 7.00 PF 0.0 S6 55.0 0.0 44.5 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.0 S5 48.0 0.0 47.5 0.0 0.000 TL 7.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 2 -0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S5 48.0 0.0 47.5 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S4 40.0 0.0 51.0 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 3 0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S4 40.0 0.0 51.0 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S3 32.0 0.0 54.4 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 4 -0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S3 32.0 0.0 54.4 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 S2 24.0 0.0 57.9 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 5, 0.1 2.635 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 S2 24.0 0.0 57.9 0.0 0.0 120 FTG ---- PE 3.5 Sl 16.0 0.0 61.4 0.0 0.000 TL 8.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 6 -30.6 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.7 1 15.0 5.5 31.0 30.6 11.9 150 FTG E PE -0.4 10 16.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 0.212 TL 3.50 PV 1.0 Pipe: 7 -30.6 1.025 PL 8.00 PF 1.7 10 16.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 11.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 11 16.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.212 TL 8.00 PV 1.0 Pipe: 8 -31.2 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 1.2 2 15.0 5.5 32.2 31.2 12.1 150 FTG T PE -0.4 11 16.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.220 TL 5.50 PV 1.0 Pipe: 9 -61.9 1.025 PL 10.58 PF 8.2 11 16.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 24.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 12 16.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 0.778 TL 10.58 PV 3.9 Pipe: 10 -34.9 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 1.5 3 15.0 5.5 40.2 34.9 13.6 ' 150 FTG T PE -0.4 12 16.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 0.270 TL 5.50 PV 1.2 Pipe: 11 -96.7 1.265 PL 13.00 PF 8.3 12 16.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 24.7 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 13 16.0 0.0 49.5 0.0 0.639 TL 13.00 PV 4.1 Pipe: 12 -38.2 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 1.8 4 15.0 5.5 48.2 38.2 14.9 150 FTG T PE -0.4 13 16.0 0.0 49.5 0.0 0.319 TL 5.50 PV 1.5 Pipe: 13 -134.9 1.505 PL 8.25 PF 7.7 13 16.0 0.0 49.5 0.0 24.3 150 FTG T PE 0.0 51 16.0 0.0 57.3 0.0 0.507 TL 15.25 PV 4.0 SPF _KLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA" SIS Page 4 Date: 04/07/1997 C:\Hizw361\MTN\MTHASREC.: JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR RECEPTION AREA PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 -31.9 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.8 5 15.0 5.5 33.7 31.9 12.4 150 FTG E PE -0.4 14 16.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 0.229 TL 3.50 PV 1.0 Pipe: 15 -31.9 1.025 PL 10.58 PF 2.4 14 16.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 12.4 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 15 16.0 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.229 TL 10.58 PV 1.0 Pipe: 16 -32.8 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 1.3 6 15.0 5.5 35.6 32.8 12.8 150 FTG T PE -0.4 15 16.0 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.241 TL 5.50 PV 1.1 Pipe: 17 -64.7 1.025 PL 13.50 PF 15.6 15 16.0 0.0 36.4 0.0 25.2 150 FTG 2E PE 0.0 16 16.0 0.0 52.1 0.0 0.846 TL 18.50 PV 4.3 Pipe: 18 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 7 15.0 0.0 52.5 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE -0.4 16 16.0 0.0 52.1 0.0 0.000 TL 5.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 19 -64.7 1.265 PL 10.50 PF 4.9 16 16.0 0.0 52.1 0.0 16.5 150 FTG T PE 0.0 50 16.0 0.0 56.9 0.0 0.304 TL 16.00 PV 1.8 Pipe: 20 -64.7 1.985 PL 10.00 PF 0.3 50 16.0 0.0 56.9 0.0 6.7 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 51 16.0 0.0 57.3 0.0 0.034 TL 10.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 21 -199.6 1.985 PL 2.00 PF 3.0 51 16.0 0.0 57.3 0.0 20.7 150 FTG T PE 0.0 52 16.0 0.0 60.3 0.0 0.272 TL 11.00 PV 2.9 Pipe: 22 -199.6 1.985 PL 3.50 PF 6.5 52 16.0 0.0 60.3 0.0 20.7 150 FTG 2ETG PE 0.0 SlA 16.0 0.0 66.8 0.0 0.272 TL 24.00 PV 2.9 Pipe: 23 -199.6 2.635 PL 15.00 PF 5.9 S1A 16.0 0.0 66.8 0.0 11.7 120 FTG E2T PE 3.5 B3 8.0 0.0 76.2 0.0 0.103 TL 57.00 PV 0.9 Pipe: 24 -17.0 1.025 PL 10.00 PF 1.0 20 24.0 5.5 9.6 17.0 6.6 150 FTG T PE 0.0 21 24.0 5.5 10.6 17.9 0.071 TL 14.50 PV 0.3 Pipe: 25 -34.9 1.025 PL 10.00 PF 2.7 21 24.0 5.5 10.6 17.9 13.6 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 22 24.0 5.5 13.3 20.0 0.270 TL 10.00 PV 1.2 Pipe: 26 -54.9 1.265 PL 4.50 PF 1.7 22 24.0 5.5 13.3 20.0 14.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 23 24.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.224 TL 7.50 PV 1.3 SP LER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANA' 3IS Page 5Y Date: 04/07/1997 W C:\Ht,.,,361 MTN \ \ MTHASREC.SDF JOB TITLE: MOUNTAIN HAUS 1ST FLOOR RECEPTION AREA PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 27 -54.9 1.265 PL 8.00 PF 2.5 23 24.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 14.0 150 FTG E PE 3.5 24 16.0 0.0 20.9 0.0 0.224 TL 11.00 PV 1.3 Pipe: 28 -54.9 1.265 PL 9.00 PF 2.7 24 16.0 0.0 20.9 0.0 14.0 150 FTG E PE 0.0 26 16.0 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.224 TL 12.00 PV 1.3 Pipe: 29 -26.5 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.9 25 15.0 5.5 23.1 26.5 10.3 150 FTG T PE -0.4 26 16.0 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.162 TL 5.50 PV 0.7 Pipe: 30 -81.4 1.505 PL 11.75 PF 3.7 26 16.0 0.0 23.6 0.0 14.7 150 FTG T PE 0.0 32 16.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.199 TL 18.75 PV 1.5 Pipe: 31 -19.1 1.025 PL 10.00 PF 1.3 27 24.0 5.5 12.1 19.1 7.4 150 FTG T PE 0.0 28 24.0 5.5 13.4 20.1 0.089 TL 14.50 PV 0.4 Pipe: 32 -39.2 1.025 PL 10.00 PF 3.3 28 24.0 5.5 13.4 20.1 15.2 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 29 24.0 5.5 16.7 22.5 0.335 TL 10.00 PV 1.6 Pipe: 33 -61.7 1.265 PL 4.50 PF 2.1 29 24.0 5.5 16.7 22.5 15.7 150 FTG E PE 0.0 30 24.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.278 TL 7.50 PV 1.7 Pipe: 34 -61.7 1.265 PL 8.00 PF 3.1 30 24.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 15.7 150 FTG E PE 3.5 31 16.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.278 TL 11.00 PV 1.7 Pipe: 35 -61.7 1.505 PL 6.00 PF 2.0 31 16.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 11.1 150 FTG ET PE 0.0 32 16.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.119 TL 17.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 36 -143.1 1.505 PL 4.50 PF 2.5 32 16.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 25.8 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 34 16.0 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.566 TL 4.50 PV 4.5 Pipe: 37 -29.7 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 1.1 33 15.0 5.5 29.2 29.7 11.6 150 FTG T PE -0.4 34 16.0 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.201 TL 5.50 PV 0.9 Pipe: 38 -172.8 1.985 PL 5.33 PF 2.3 34 16.0 0.0 29.9 0.0 17.9 150 FTG E PE 0.0 35 16.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.208 TL 10.83 PV 2.2 Pipe: 39 -172.8 1.985 PL 8.00 PF 2.8 35 16.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 17.9 150 FTG E PE 0.0 37 16.0 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.208 TL 13.50 PV 2.2 - •i..LER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANI SIS Page s 6 p Date: 04/07/1997 TITLE: MOUNTAIN C:\H,;6S61\MTN\MTHASREC.SuF HAUS 1ST FLOOR RECEPTION AREA PIPE DATA (cont.) j PIPE TAG PRESS END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS)DIA(IN) (FT)LENGTH SUM. i A NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) y Pipe: 40 0.0 1.025 PL 1.67 PF 0.0 36 15.0 0.0 35.4 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 37 16.0 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.000 TL 8.67 PV 0.0 Pipe: 41 -172.8 1.985 PL 9.00 PF 1.9 37 16.0 0.0 34.9 0.0 17.9 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 39 16.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.208 TL 9.00 PV 2.2 Pipe: 42 0.0 1.025 PL 1.67 PF 0.0 38 15.0 0.0 37.3 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ET PE -0.4 39 16.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 0.000 TL 8.67 PV 0.0 Pipe: 43 -172.8 1.985 PL 9.50 PF 3.9 39 16.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 17.9 150 FTG T PE 0.0 47 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.208 TL 18.50 PV 2.2 Pipe: 44 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 40 15.0 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 41 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 45 0.0 1.025 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 41 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 43 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 6.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 46 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 42 15.0 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE -0.4 43 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 1.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 47 0.0 1.025 PL 5.00 PF 0.0 43 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 46 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 9.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 48 0.0 1.025 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 44 15.0 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 150 FTG E PE -0.4 45 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 3.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 49 0.0 1.265 PL 1.00 PF 0.0 45 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG T PE 0.0 46 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 6.50 PV 0.0 Pipe: 50 0.0 1.985 PL 8.33 PF 0.0 46 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.0 150 FTG ---- PE 0.0 47 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.000 TL 8.33 PV 0.0 Pipe: 51 -172.8 1.985 PL 49.00 PF" 47 16.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 17.9 150 FTG T PE y0.0 48 16.0 0.0 52.8 0.0 0.208 TL 58.00 PV 2.2 Pioe: 52 -172.8 1.985 PL 6.00 PF 5.5 48 16.0 0.0 52.8 0.0 17.9 150 FTG 2=--- 49 16.0 0.0 58.3 0.0 0.208 TL 26.50 PV 2.2 uTnmL•C . L. V a LJ w.I • / I , 1/ /•77..171 7�1 ^Mf. r.1^Y/\ „/\YF-/\fwfw /tea 1- 4-Im- LTACC 4K14KiK 1.-1V11U .Y4y4 V-4 LViLll4K L.y 4114 c 1 n T.1„1f�/\Y 77171.^/�v.ew• 4V1t11JM en TrT 1*D ✓L \LfLL\ QVCRILMff ✓lUi...'L LSVnDATTT T/• A*TAPTC 71�r^ 7 l/i L/i\f1V 114 L7L.� tU L Kyo / n-�^ • A A /717 /1 no -7 LM 44• VZ/ V / / 1JJ I ^^„e. /\ „^ 7I nT 7A 7 r7.-a„4-^nl 1.1fs KlfK41 1144tfU4 ffV. JiVL/ZJ yi KLt 4-4K L.y Cn1T VVL L'1 i'LL• i`V VAI. mL'Lili♦ 4• `l UY1 UXTTwCd vrnVD �L"lil. `l"L11lL1Ua\LJ4 •UIJa 41 J J L\K1f41L.YVVM L/1 • / 1. • L ioi' Dy/4LvT-j iVl. CLl)\lp-A A+-1 -„4-c7 /`A 7A7 A r, Cl4i Klt4K/ Vl"l JVJZ�I `!+ / iil4 US U 441U ILMU 1/4411 /✓KiK1l44K MV LJi V Y 1K4 Klf K Y 4y Ky4 L A. L ✓l"l iL"L l 4V114. / 11{LJK1413V4 \,.►1 11VK4 VL yk-{ M11K \A 111M11111t M1t ,F n n=n— ,,. V A"T"xf- iLa , n / /+nu nT A / T1T \ r LllkTe- 1TJ 71101+00 VI,T�/, VL L'1/ ✓iA-1, 11./ i"SlV ill LL\LUV► LL. ✓ Ajagn L+TLdff LLL Y• 1Tnrl L• V V • 71m L L nT0/• TYVT /Vr)o1 LTTLT//•l /Lim1 CITY LTnnLf0 ✓ l U 4• Y LL ` L L U/ 1111 ` V/ ` L y/ U V l'L I.VL/LU /L�R1\ /V\ /n0T\ /l^nv\ v r /1+m `L i/ t1\/ ,a Ui/ `VaL'L/ i•L•/Li /n0T\ `t U1/ ni„4. N JJ -I 7n 0n nG7 nT n nn nv 7 1 1/ 4 . V L V 4• V V L L J• i Z n 1 V . n V• V J V ♦ J n. n y V J 7' n i•i m/• m n v C1 • 1 4 V i y V y V. V U i c n i V• V n n V. V V i. T n. n n nco MT n nn IM o V• L J V L L 1 4• V V &v 1. V iTi„4• JZ -177 0 n en= nr 0 nn nv 1 7 &L V. V V L L 1• J ✓ 1 1 V • V V• V V 1 . A I 11 I nn V. V V• 14V L 1V LJ ilL J • J ui 0•n n•n y n,n n n7A mT 1 c nn 'n n 7 V. V// y y 1 V• V V L Y V•/ 711''4• yJ -1771 0 n cnG nT cn nn nL• c n 1/ 4• V !, • V J J L L V V . V V i L V• V Vi o n V. V n n V. V cc 1 V V • 1 n n In n Inn v t- nV nv n A Dn V. V 1 V . 4 i 4w a y V L. L &- V• V L1' $.n n,n 7n 1 /4.1 n n V.V n n7A MT 7c nn ncf n 7 V.V/J iL /V•VV LY V•/ 714- cc L il./4 • JV _1 771 O n c7I: nr rzl nn 711+ A n on V4 o n V•V n n V.V 7n I /4.1 n n 1/ 4• V 1 n n 4• V J J L ai nn 1fm� ..,/ 1. V V - - a L -nv Z• V V•V iV.4 1V Lit- - - V•V 107 L J Vn . V. V % 4 V nnn,70m n nA T CI nn nTr n 7 • • V. V / J i L J 1• V V L Y V• I n' „^ • G7 L 11J4 • J/ _77n A J/ n c,) nr A C nn r)v nn 7 107 LJ J o n V . V n n V. V 7c n n n 4. T nI A 4. V J J LL n Inn 1+m� T .I • V V m a s 711+ 4 V • J n n n / V. 4 V. V 4 1. / 1 V L 1 V i L L V• ni o n V • V n n V•V i)v•r v.n n Ino MT cn nn nTT 7 n V •./c.V to Vv• VV a Y r.�, cO L il✓4• JV _7771 A J/4•Z A nnc nT An nI, 1 MA LZ o n V.V n n V•V Ac /V•J n n A A T•V4V LL I n n VMe, ../. VV vm LL 711+ 1...I 7 n D= ✓ J I n i• V n n V• V 1711 n V•V n n J•Z 14V L iV n nAn MT L1 7C'. nn LL Tlf J•V n c i V 1• V V. V V• V T V 1 L ✓ J• V V L V• V L 11./4 • ✓J VrVVTI 7110VOCTMV TnOC nVTTTrNV TTI V i 1 n 1• V n A V• I nA n A n L itf aJLJ 7 L L\LUwJVl\L LVAJU ✓L Y 141 n „/.; 777 A V i V T• V V• V J• V 1/Ji � J/ 4• Z yl./llt Dc I n n n I n1 n n n LJ 1• V V• V i V i• V V. V ' r),"-. 111J4• cn _77n A c non nr c nn 7117 A I VV J/4•T V.4VV LLJ V•VV iL V•i TTI 1 n n n I n A n n n 7 A l A n IMMt l v 711, n A V• V i V T• V V. V J• J 1 T V a L V V i L V . T TTn V �+ n n V• V n n V• V l nA n n n nnA mm 7n nn ncf n 1 i V Z• J V• V V. V V Z i L J V• -W L Y V• 1 T),„^• cI Li1.J4• Vi _7771 A c non nr cn nn 7117 n n rTn n n n n 1 n A c n n J/4•Z 7 A V•4VV tL I A n vmn VV •VV n LL 711+ V•4 n n V• V V► V i V Z• ..I V. V J• J i Z V L 1 V V L L V. V TT7 V J n n n A I nA O A n A nnA MT cG AA 7177 n I V. V V• V i V Z. V V• V V . V V T i L V J• V V L Y V . i n; „... Li1.J \'• en V4 _n7n A c non T)T in nn nL� n n J/4•T V•LVV LL 1V.VV LL V•4 V J n n V. n n l n A o n n 7 A I An 1+mt- m 711+ n n V V . V i V Z• V V . V .,I •/ --TW L i V y L L V . V TTA VZ n n V.V C10l•L� UL\4” I n9. A /AT /A \ A AAA MT cn nn 71[7 n I iVJ►V k1./C / V.VVZ 1LJ V4•VV i Y V•i uTnmL•C . L. V a LJ w.I • / I , 1/ /•77..171 7�1 ^Mf. r.1^Y/\ „/\YF-/\fwfw /tea 1- 4-Im- LTACC 4K14KiK 1.-1V11U .Y4y4 V-4 LViLll4K L.y 4114 c 1 n T.1„1f�/\Y 77171.^/�v.ew• 4V1t11JM ♦1L�wJU V•1•V 441 LJy Vyy ulll ^^„e. /\ „^ 7I nT 7A 7 r7.-a„4-^nl 1.1fs KlfK41 1144tfU4 ffV. JiVL/ZJ yi KLt 4-4K L.y LTDC C7 rr. i -..77•n T„.� Lla\✓ ✓r U \-4Attw / 1114 n i A 7 D�„1.1\1.7^^.i 717.- AT L, 41 J J L\K1f41L.YVVM L/1 • / 1. • L A+-1 -„4-c7 /`A 7A7 A r, Cl4i Klt4K/ Vl"l JVJZ�I `!+ / iil4 US U 441U ILMU 1/4411 /✓KiK1l44K MV LJi V Y 1K4 Klf K Y 4y Ky4 Ki}i 41.1 V•nn1 11{LJK1413V4 \,.►1 11VK4 VL yk-{ M11K \A 111M11111t M1t ,F n n=n— ,,. 1ttWK1Ktl44 K4 K1 Lr ilVK4 V- V •VJ4 jV446• QnD'.---TSTL+D averm1/ LTv1lDArTrT!, A*TAT TQ ne/vA O tJil \LLL\ VL-11L1/'t AA ne}A. AA /A7 /1 lal yi\lLV -.-[71. ,.q AA7 LA" 44. VZ/ V / I \, i1J / ��iii /�ui 1 \ I/mAT\ 1RmLTA an7T/'f QnrT VVV 4. %l Vi �l'lil• %/'L.LA"73,"LW4!rd mlmLL: ::V VT:t L'n T:: ;VTC iSm L'LVVR DLDJ4Lr'mi , - Vt*T CLD I �i \ �7A7 A/T1 }Tf \J/ Y41V414S Y,YAf•/�1,YAI� eYA Y,Y1 w}A/� FAY 1 TPAYT.Ie}1er, L./L 4VUKL 4-1 ML4 itt446a /•7 } t./L iV1 iltLV1+4"41V11 1 OYA Vtlir� "4161 "14 „[•AI'7 lf,aAV4 KV4K A �,e 7 etin7 },� }�^ nTs!'•}AT.I 1%e V1 Twf,1l. fTe}AY ila yKi "11411161 T1A7 A/T1 }Tf 4t44 Ur U6.4{N. i-LKA ilYMI{{ fiK 44L Y41V4i 4r / A \ nrnv DrmmTAT/TCT mA nr p \ Z/ & i L" i i i L i 1, V-1 1 Cty LJJ i'1V4 mK�IV t%K�l4• Uy�ntI yAa4%y y�y� A La7VL• L'L 1/1RID13TAT l'LT1a L11\iC'1J.J• 6rJTV allJ^i: InA yl "tY4441 T AT/�I}�A "6JK1 V Ki 4116. L 1 4411161 1 T T1i AA} LJ41161 waU ill 1 446. \ iT Y m r ry n ^ A n T% 4 y 6J A TAA T •+rfV 1 I rTti, LT77 Tf D�.f�77 Tf L44 L1161LIi 41111 viV yLr ^e}T77 Tf A 7 ,../+hL nnT77 Tf YiV VK 4V1V Alt{{4ttJ1 ya V1V 4.VV7 M•VV +A An AA �i nn L An i V. V V J. V I nn �A nn �A An •A nnG V i 1. V V V. V V 1A nn i. V V i V. V V T. V 4 V nn nn L An nn An 17 An 1 V• V V 4 V. V V -.-- .VVi n AA nn An 1A nn 13 MXMV1DiicA-T mV*ttju LTUTt^A .: n1 ,.1A}AY Li Mlll4441 LT A`,11 Tfe l AY,} D7 }}; r/f T AA/�I}j',A rTi J.361K1 V "14114 1 1 46.111,' L41/\1 411V AA'F ill L 441,. m T L 4 n L VI 1'44 V LLT Y7111 V Lllly "ii 4AAJ%V71 4u1,-Y71Y L'alul411J\ yL'Y71 TV L7C 4• V J J O nn f7 nn L nn in nn In nn V. V V 1/. V V I nn IA nn 1A nn V. V V 1 J. V V i V. V V 1• V V i Z. V V i Z. W V 1'LA'1VL: u'1CAi`1^LD.T. V1D6^.l*: &Avg—. {n/ ni e,wA}AY yl Ktll444L aA-,Lr.J: ZT.A. LT.r„ i Tfe l As,} LTi i-}, —g T A—~4-he. LJ \1K1 V "14114 1 16.41)16,1 L41161 6.11-1 ila L 444 m T ev 4 V Dl l TAA T ....LTI l t-$11LT77 Tf 131F,fT77 Tf /Te4-T77 LI11 1 44 L1a 1611111 44441 V i V ,i.y V i V ,f V K 4 V i V L non V. 4 V V n AA mn An 1L An czm An 97 nn L Z. V V rz An J 4• V V 1 V. V V ✓ J. V V 1/ .. y V J. V V r)'A V T T T • -gArn JDJD11" • 4m Lirl74 • IJ V n7 e„lA}Ay. yi M1LL4441 LTTI t Tfe 7 A,1,1F L,1 }};f,I� r 1 T DAA} C--4-U— Jd J"1 V "14116. 1 1441/16/-JJ1161414-1 ill 1 444 m z' ^ C aD\ L+7 7 mAA A c_LT7 Lii !Te4-TT7 Tf 144 Z✓ Lii 1441\Kll 4V Kt./161 VAa, 41141 4"4 V i V 1 Ani. 1. VLJ n r.A A Gn 1 nn A rln n c.A 4•✓V A GA n rn Z.✓V i.VV V.✓V V.✓V T.✓V VlJV 1. 4 V✓ An n �A A rzn rz Gn n �n J. V V ✓.✓ V 1. V V V. J V V ...IV .I .../V V• JV 1 �nL i.✓ V✓ A nn 7 nn 1 MA n GA A CA L �A n GA Z. V V /• V V 1. J V V. J V V• J V V.✓ V V•✓ V 1 no= i./ V J rZ GA A nn n nn A CA n CA A AAn 9zA J.✓ V /. V V 4. V V V. J V V• J V • J. V V V.✓ V QTfD ..JL LqT LSD CvemL+v vvnD71 TTT T/+ AAT 7lT -'"\ uLAi\ UiwJi ...'1 111 L/L�ClV L1Y all•t-1, \ Uf%TT&TMX TAT VATTQ , T 4A}-• AA /A17 /, AA17 11 /\�U L/�.4VZ/V/�iJJ/ T/1D RfT7T1T L+. QT vT nnD DL,/'\L�T'fR1Tn T 7►D lytuLJ• &VVLv Cl yl\ 1LL'LVV 1� .L iLJVVL\ L\LYui ty Vl\- �11V.1�aL�71 TAA MVn QTTnnr v /.rmirip ••ALLi\ .JV1 L yiL YVi\YL n 001 D I L\ I � I C "7'71 TT I D I " I u � V fl AAA L Vi/1. ---------------- 7 71 T V*-ZmTn fl f+ �+ uuY ua• u I — n I tl — L\V �M114V1 •t (.a44L AJ tANNyr Cnn A ,..,.. n ' yVT. JJ t.Jut L V44 • Z yt./•t� I V —L'lY�4y1MIJyY •.f.lVYi �.J`'`NNyI , 7A An n; A C7n A ...,,.. n � n n11_1 __ _1 _ _ _ _ 1___ _ _- __ _ _ _ -1__ _ __ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -1_ nnn Inn Ann rznn COO "Inn OAA V V VT /N67 / nn>t \ L"—Vv \ V L /'1 / 0 __-_J-___________1 n n n , n n n J V V i V V V f,EBC� Backflow DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY Prevention Physical Properties Size of Mainline 2 1/2", 3, 4", 6", 8", & 10" Max. Working Pressure 175 PSI (1200 KPa) Hydrostatic Test Press. 350 PSI (2400 KPa) Temperature Range 32°F to 140°F internal and external (0°C to 60°C) End Connections Flanged ANSI 816.1 NRS and OS&Y resilient Class 125 Materials Main Valve Body Ductile iron ASTM A536 Grade 65-45-12 Coating Fusion epoxy coated min internal and external Vertical Support Adaptor' AWWA C550-90 Shut Off Valves NRS and OS&Y resilient i by customer) for valve wedge AWWA C509 weight only. gate valves Trim Bronze ASTM 8584 Alloy C83600 Elastomer Discs EPDM Spring Stainless steel Installation Views i 18" min 811 min Grooved End Coupling 18" zAF min a18" .., I minim Ste. Y min 12" min jkd Optional Valve -�`- Setter �a r.. FLOW Standard orientation (model 870' / 870V) U.S. Patent No. 4,989,635 • U.S. Patent No. 5,107,888 U.S. Patent No. 5,385,166 • U.S. Patent No. 5,226,441 U.S. Patent No. 5,392,803 MODEL 870V DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY (Shown in vertical position.) MODEL 870 DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY 18" min FLOW "tFdir -� min =rR " j ; 18" y11` min Vertical Support Adaptor' �-- Vit - Pipe Support (furnished 12" min I i i by customer) for valve I weight only. r Vertical orientation (model 870V) 'Note -Model 870 does not include grooved end coupling '"Adaptor supplied with 870V only. Recommended minimum clearances from permanent structures for ease of testing and maintenance. berles 51 (40) (i; (1 5? Materials of Construction ITEM DESCRIPTION MATERIALS ITEM DESCRIPTION MATERIALS 1 Body A536 GR 65-45-12 15 Bearing Socket Acetal Resin 2Cover Disc Holder (10" only} A536 GR 65-45-12 I 16 Hex Jam Nut (2 1/2"-8") 18-8 SS 2.1 O -Ring EPDM ASTM 02000 i Capscrew (10") 18-8 SS 2.2 Cap Screw Plated Steel 17 ; Washer 302 SS 2.3 Hex Nut Plated Steel 18 Flange Bolt Plated Steel 2.4 Expansion Pin 420 SS I 18.1 ' Flange Nut Plated Steel 2.5 Cover (w/o hole) A536 GR 65-45-12 19 Cover 8584 Alloy C83600 3 Seat Ring B584 Alloy C83600 24 Bolt Plated Steel 3.1 Gasket EPDM ASTM 02000 24.1 Washer Plated Steel 4 Arm B584 Alloy C83600 25 Bolt Plated Steel 4.1 Bushing -Swing Pin Acetal Resin I 26 Gasket EPDM ASTM D2000 4.2 Swing Pin 304 SS 35 O -Ring EPDM ASTM D2000 5 Retaining Clip 302 SS 35.1 Back-up Ring Acetal Resin 5.1 Retaining Clip 302 SS 36 Cover 8584 Alloy C83600 6 Check Disc (2 1/2"-8") EPDM Coated GR, 45 i 40 Ball Valve 8584 Alloy C84400 14 Flange Gasket Ductile Iron with 304 SS stem 41 Nipple Brass Seat Disc (10") Silicone ASTM D2000 i 42 Gate Valve (NRS) AWWA C509 6.1 Disc Holder (10" only} ASTM A743 304 SS 43 Bulkhead Fitting B584 Alloy C83600 6.2 Disc Retainer (10" only) ASTM A743 304 SS I 43.1 I Bulkhead Fitting 8584 Alloy C83600 6.3 Capscrew (10" only) 18-8 SS 1 44 Bulkhead Plug 8584 Alloy C83600 7 Load Pin 304 SS 1 451 Gasket EPDM ASTM D2000 8 Lwr Spring Retnr 8584 Alloy C83600 I 45.1 1 Gasket EPDM ASTM 02000 9 Spring Stem 304 SS 46 j Washer B36 Alloy 260 i 9.1 Electric Stop Jam Nut 18-8 SS 46.1 I Washer B36 Alloy 260 10 I Spring A313 Type 631 SS I 47 Nut 8584 Alloy C83600 10.2 Spring Shim Acetal Resin I 47.1 Nut 8584 Alloy C83600 10.3 Spring Shim Acetal Resin 60 Identification Plate B36 Alloy C26000 11 Spring Guide 8130 Alloy C22000 i 61 Identification Plate 836 Alloy C26000 12 Upr Spring Retnr 8584 Alloy C83600 I 62 Drive Screw Stainless Steel 12.1 Bushing-Spr. Stem Acetal Resin i 70 Clamp (870V ONLY) AWWA C606 13 Pivot Bearing 8584 Alloy C83600 14 Flange Gasket Rubber / Fabric I r - Model 870 /'WOV MwAel870V Standard Orientation Vertical Orientation NOTE: The Model 870V is shipped in the standard _ (N -Shape) orientation as shown below. Model 870 —� does not include grooved end coupling. a grooved end coupling Ct Dimensions E E1 NRS Side View Size A B C I E j E1 NRS OS&Y I Full Open; F G I K M NET WTI NET OSBY i NR pproximate 2 1/2" I 12 1/2 25 3/4 24 1/4 12 5/8 16 3/8 1 16 5/8 6 1/4 13 5/8 27 1/4 190 i 200 3" 12 1/2 25 3/4 24 3/4 i 12 7/8 22 1/4 16 5/8 6 1/4 14 1/8 28 1/4 260 270 4" 14 27 7/8 ! 263/4 1 14 3/8 23 1/4 17 3/4 ! 7 15 1/2 31 300 320 6" j 16 ! 32 1/4 32 1/4 18 7/8 30 1/8 21 5/8 i 8 18 5/8 1 37 1/4 460 ' 500 8" j 18 1/2 37 1/2 1 36 3/8 23 1/2 j 37 3/4 24 3/4 9 1/4 1 20 3/4 1 41 1/2 780 1 840 10" 1 21 42 1/2 i 40 3/4 27 1/2 48 27 1/2 10 i 24 48 1320 1 1450 Weights do not include risers or optional valve setter. Note: Dimensions shown are nominal. Allowances must be made for normal manufacturing tolerances. Refer to Specification Sheet SS VS for details on valve setter. Options Agency Co . liance ❑ Valve Setter with MJ x FL or FL x FL ends Model 870V ❑ UL/FM O.S. & Y. RW Gate Valves Size 2 1/2" - 8" ❑ Wye Strainer • ASSE Listed 1015 • CSA •UL' •FM' Application Sizes 2 1/2" - 10" • ANSI/AWWA C510-89 Non -Health Hazard Model 870 Sizes 2 1/2" - 6" •UL' FM' Flow Orientation Sizes 2 1/2" - 8" •ASSE Listed 1015 • CSA Standard orientation is inlet flow vertical up, outlet Approved by the Foundation for Cross -Connection flow vertical down. Control and Hydraulic Research at the University of Vertical orientation is inlet and outlet flow vertical up. Southern California. Sizes 2 1/2" - 10" • ANSI/AWWA C510-89 'Less gates not FM approved. Less gates not UL listed unless installed with UL listed gate valves. Flow Curves Model 870/870V N 12 0 10 10 8 N 6 4 I 2 _18 N 16 14 0 12 0 10 �8 ti 6 v 4 Z 2 50 100 150 200 GPM 14 _-12 N 10 0 8 0 6 10 ti 4 v 12 0 0 -- _ 0 GPM 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 50 GPM 4" IVAW_--ft� =12 N CL 10 0 8 0 J 6 10 16 4 M 12 i I 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 GPM 1 nIi 0 I I GPM A - Vertical orientation (model 870V) The 6", 8", and 10" flow curves (B only) include B - Standard orientation (model 870) the FEBC0 valve setter model 611. FEBCO Division of CMB Industries P.O. Box 8070 Fresno CA 93747 Fax: (209) 453-9030 870/870V SS 6/95 VP ©1995 CMB Industries June 23, 1997 Dan Stanek Town of Vail Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Dan: A R C H I T E C T S Per your request that the Mountain Haus comply with Section 4306 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code, which requires fire/smoke dampers in all corridor supply ducts, we are submitting the following Action Plan. ACTION PLAN 1. Hire MKK to preform Heat Loss Calculations to determine how the existing mechanical system is performing. Report findings would provide options on how to improve mechanical system in conjunction with the fire/smoke damper installation. 2. Present MKK Findings at August 29t'', 1997 Mountain Haus Board Meeting. Board to Determine Course of Action A. Install fire/smoke dampers with minimal or no mechanical system upgrades B. Proceed with mechanical system upgrades in conjunction with fire/smoke damper installation and hire MKK to complete engineering design work. 3. Required Steps after Course of Action approved by Mountain Haus Board 1. Complete engineering design work 2. Bidding 3. Allocation of Funds 4. Set Schedule of Construction Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sind L Fritzle rchitect L:\9527C\TOV0618. WPD Planning • Architecture • Interiors 1650 East Vail Valley Drive Fallridge C-1 • Vail, Colorado 81657 9 fpb@colorado.net • fax (970) 4764901 9 (970) 476-6342 TOWN OF VAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX 970-479-2452 May 27, 1997 F ri tzl cn, P i crc c, B ri n cr Lynn Fritzlen Mountain Haus smoke/firc dampers Lynn; As per your letter dated May 20,1997 in reguards to the smokc/fire damper installation in corridors. Smokc/firc dampers arc required in all corridor supply ducts as per sec. 4306 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code. Per our discussions Fritzlen,Plerce, Brinner has the approval to address the smoke/fire dampers by Jnc 30, 1997 Sincerely Town of Vail Dan Stanek 7",1�LVffi ding O cial C 0514w�-I- ^- RECYCLEDPAPER TM 05/21/97 11:26 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE .rw MEMORANDUM TO: Dan Stanek, Town of Vail Building Official DATE: May 20, 1997 FROM: Stephanie Lord RE: Mountain Haus Fire/Smoke Dampers IA 0 01 A R C H I T E C T 5 Per your letter dated May 5, 1997, we have been pursuing the installation of Fire/Smoke Dampers in the supply ducts that feed the common area corridors. We have spoken with several consultants to determine the what is feasible within the existing conditions. Listed below are two options that address TOV concerns, Mountain Haus concerns, and feasibility. Contrary to earlier discussions, during review of the drawings it was revealed that only the ducts on the 6'h floor provide supply air to interior units as well as the corridors_ Ducts on floors 1 to 5 only supply air to the common area corridors. Hyder Construction and Robinson Mechanical confirmed that there are (12) duct penetrations, two per floor. Options: 1. Install fire/smoke dampers in the wall at each floor which are connected to tiie general alarm. Based on our discussions with Bill Vail of Robinson Mechanical, Jim Craft of Simplex, and Sandy Gray following are the requirements, time line, and cost of this solution. A. Mechanical Engineering Determine CFM requirements. The ducts supply the corridors with fresh air and also serve as heating and cooling in the corridor. Mountain Haus spent approximately $100,000 last year to improve the heating in the supply ducts_ Therefore, it must be verified that the dampers and motor to not adversely impact air flow or temperature control. B i I I Vail suggested that the motors may not need to be housed in the ducts, but could have an access panel in the units or corridor. He also mentioned a new product which combines the diffusers and dampers into one more compact unit. This would help lessen the impact on the mechanical system. Conclusion: MKK must verify mechanical impacts and specify components. Turnaround time: minimum two to three weeks. B. Simplex Accordiuoo to Jim Craft of Simplex, coordinating the dampers with the fire alarm system would requires only a simple relay_ The fire alarm system treats the dampers as one Post -It' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 k of rases From Co. co. Dept. Phone k FW • FAX N itecture • Interiors a Epharcht(d�vad-net • fax(970)4764901 a (970) 476-6342 05/21/97 11:26 FAX 9704764901 FRITZLEN PIERCE 1A 002 more notification step during general alarm. Depending on the final solution, the 12 dampers could be serviced by one 10 Amp relay_ Conclusion: Simplex. coordinates the relay with mechanical engineer's damper specification and programs the alarm system accordingly. Electrician performs all wiring_ Turnaround time 3-5 days for Simplex. Electrician installation: ? C Ordering and Installation Per Bill Vail and Hyder Construction, typical turnaround time on fire/smoke dampers is 4 to 6 weeks. However, it can take up to 12 weeks depending on custom manufacturing Installation time is dependant on Final solution and components. D. Mountain Haus Allocation of Funds The Mountain Haus Condominium Association would need to have a board meeting to approve the funding of the project and to verify compliance with long range objectives. Turnaround time minimum of 30 days. This option would meet Requirement #5 for your letter dated May 5, 1997. However, it could not be accomplished by the completion of the Sprinkler and Common Area Upgrade on June 30, 1997_ Additionally, the Mountain Haus may wish to weight the cost ($12,000 to $18,000) against future mechanical system upgrades before approving funds for fall installation. This solution does not turn off the air handling units. Per discussions with Dan Stanek, FPB can generate a proposal that addresses the mechanical concerns and feasibility issues of the smoke/£re dampers by June 301, 1997. #2 - install fusible fire dampers This option would stop fire from spreading via the corridor supply ducts with a fusible fire damper. Mechanical engineering, coordination with Simplex, and long turnaround times are eliminated with this option. Smoke dampering would not be addressed_ Hyder would be able to install the fusible fire damper during the current construction schedule. Because we could use a one-time accordion style damper the cost is reduced and has minimal effect on future mechanical system upgrades and solutions. This solution could be funded by the existing contingency fund and as we understand it would not require Board review. Hyder would need to know by May 22, I997 if this option would meet requirement #5. Otherwise schedule is effected. Due to the tight time schedule we would appreciate your quick response to our findings and options_ Please contact Lynn Fritzlen or myself with any questions or comments. cc: Sandra Gray, Mountain Haus Brian Engelking, Hyder Construction Bill Vail, Robinson Mechanical i.;w:)z �10oo1wrn�cv[trco nma 3.�oos2o.wrn ' REPT 131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE i 12/05/97-17_46µREQUESTS ^FOR -INSPECTION -WORK -SHEETS �FOR-12/M5/97AREA: -DS-- Activity: B97-0015 12/ 5/97 Type: A -COMM Status: ISSUED Constr. ACOM Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS Parcel: 2101-082-28-000 Occ: Use: II FR Description: COMMON AREAS REMODEL AND 1:1RE= SUPRESSION SYS Applicant: HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Phone: 3038251313 Owner: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC Phone: 476-2434 Contractor: HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Phone: 3038251313 Inspection Request Information..... Requestor: STEPHANIE LORD Phone: Req Time: 01:00 Comments: Items requested to be Inspected... Action Comments �Qrl Time Exp 005 L __ ' ''"'1�� -_ 3'11'1_1 111111 MUST 8E AZ= Inspection History..... Item: 00030 BLDG -Framing 05/14/97 Inspector: DS Action: APF'R 4TH FLOOR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/19/97 Inspector: DS Action: PIA 4TH FLOOR ONLY 05/23/97 Inspector: DS Action: PIA 5TH FLOOR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 3rd floor only 05/28/97 Inspector: DS Action: PIA 6TH FLOOR ONLY 05/30/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN 2ND FLOOR NOT READY 06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PIA 3RD FLOOR, ATRIUM 6TH 06/05/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN CANCELLED 06/06/97 Inspector: DS Action: APF'R FIRST FLOOR Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail 05/27/97 Inspector-: DS Action: APPR 5th floor only 05/30/97 Inspector-: DS Action: PA 6TH FLOOR ONLY 06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 2ND FLOOR ONLY 06/06/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 2ND FLOOR 06/11/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 1RST FLOOR ONLY Itela: 00090 BLDG -Final Item: 00530 BL.DG-Temp. C/O 06/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN NOT READY 06/30/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR CORRIDORS THROUGHOUT Notes: AS PER LETTER DATED MAY 2791997, SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTAL -LED IN CORRIDORES BY 11-15-97 12/02/97 Inspector: CD Action: APF'R GOOD UNTIL- 5/1/98 Notes: SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND ARE OPERATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ISSUES MUST BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO A FINAL C. O. BEING ISSUED j 12/0/97 _ Inspector: (�D Action: APPR GOOD UNTIL 5/1/98 1 Notes: TCO ONLY IS APPROVED. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETE THROUGHOUT BUILDING, UNITS 1.01 , 103, 105 NOT COMPL AT THIS POINT Item: 00531 FIRE -TEMP. C/O, Item: 00533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item: 00537 FLAN -FINAL C/O Lf�/ Item: 00538 FIRE -FINAL C/O / C� Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O �- REPT 131 TOWN OF VAIL 12/05/97 17:46 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION Activity: B97-0015 12/ 5/97 Type: A -COMM Status: ISSUED Constr: HUM Address: 292 E MEADOW DR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/19/97 Inspector: Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS PA 4TH FLOOR ONLY Parcel: 2101-082-28-000 DS Occ: Use: II FR Description: COMMON AREAS REMODEL AND FIRE SUPRESSION SYS Applicant: HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Phone: 3038251313 Owner: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC Phone: 476-2434 Contractor: HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Phone: 3038251313 ----------------------------------- Inspection Request Information..... Requestor: STEPHANIE LORD Phone: Req Time: 01:00 Comments: Items requested to be Inspected Action Comments Time Exp 00530 OLDG-Temp. C013 .-f Gq'-----' ------- -------' ------ ___------------------------------- Inspection ____________________-_-_-'_ -1nspection History..... `~-- -- ---- Item: 00030 BLDG-Framinn �- ---'= 05/14/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 4TH FLOOR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/19/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 4TH FLOOR ONLY 05/23/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 5TH FLOOR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 3rd floor only 05/28/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 6TH FLOOR ONLY 05/30/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN 2ND FLOOR NOT READY 06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 3RD FLOOR, ATRIUM 6TH 06/05/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN CANCELLED 06/06/97 Inspector; DS Action: APPR FIRST FLOOR Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail 05/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 5th floor only 05/30/97 Inspector: D9 Action: PA 6TH FLOOR ONLY 06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 2ND FLOOR ONLY 06/06/97 Inspector: DS Actionw PA 2ND FLOOR 06/11/97 Inspector; DS Action: APPR 1RST FLOOR ONLY Item: 00090 BLDG -Final Item: 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O 06/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN NOT READY 06/30/97 Inspector: DS ActionL APPR CORRIDORS THROUGHOUT Notes: AS PER LETTER DATED MAY 27,1997, SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED IN CORRIDORES BY 11-15-97 12/02/97 Inspector: CD Action: APPR GOOD UNTIL 5/1/98 Notes: SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND ARE OPERATTOkk: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ISSUES MUST BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO A FINAL C.O. BEING ISSUED 12/05/97 Inspector: CD Action: APPR GOOD UNTIL 5/1/98 Notes: TCO ONLY IS APPROV[Q. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETE THROUGHOUT BUILDING, UNITS 101,103,105 NOT COMPL AT THIS POINT Item: 00531 FIRE -TEMP. C/O Item: 00533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item: 00537 PLAN -FINAL C/O �/��' J ~�^'��- 996' Item: 00538 FIRE -FINAL C/O It,m: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O M May 5, 1997 Fritzl en,Pi erce,Briner Lynn Fritzlen Inspections at Mountain Haus Remodel week of April 28, 1997. Lynn, The following items are required to be completed as part of the building remodel (Building Permit #B97-0015.) 1. 6th floor corridor ceiling is required to be one hour rated. 2. Stairs shafts are required to be 2 hour construction. 3. Stair shaft ceiling at 7th floor, 2 hour construction is required. 4. Fire sprinkler system is required in the void in the 6th floor ceiling corridor where combustible framing occurs. Sincerely Town of Vail Dan Stanek Mike McGee Building Official Fire Marshal TOWN 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138/479-2139 FAX 970-479-2452 May 5, 1997 Fritzien,Piercc,Briner Lynn Fritzlen Meeting at Mountain Haus on May 14,1997. Lynn; F Department of Community Development The following items are required to be completed as part of the building remodel (Building Permit #B97-0015.) 1. 6th floor corridor ceiling is required to be one hour rated. 2. Stairs shafts are required to be separated from corridor by draft stop (rock wool) above stair shaft doors. 3. Stair shaft ceiling at 6th floor to be fire sprinkled (dry heads). 4. Fire sprinkler system is required in the void in the 6th floor ceiling corridor where combustible framing occurs. 5. Smoke/fire dampers are required in all corridor supply ducts. 6. Individual unit smoke/fire dampers will be requred when individual units are remodeled. 7. Corridor/shaft (glazing and doors ) to be 2hour rated, future remodel. 8. Unit doors that are in the stair shafts to be smoke/fire scaled. Sincerely Town of Vail Dan Stanek Building Official IL �� RECYCLEDPAPER 04/24/98 08:15 ^V970 468 0295 NWCCOG Post -it° Fax Note Application ,Job Address: Legal Deser: . Owner: Mount -in 14;aulz 0 Vail MAY 0 6 1998 Mailing Address_ Phone r: (970)476-2434 Elevator Contractor: Dover Elevator Company VlailingAddress: 6374 South Racine Circle F.mglewnnd- Cnlnrnrin Rni i l 'AHT APPLICATION Permit # 292 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado Phone,—: (303) 790-8566 Class of Work: C New Installation (� major Alteration Describe Work: Eliminate jerky ride & provide smooth starting, stopping and leveling.Upgrade current ADA & ANSI A17.1 code requirements NOTICE I herebv cenifv that I have read and examined this application and ',no%v the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances goveming this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law rezularins construction or the performance of construction- k Signature of contractor or authorized agent (Date) Signature of owner (Date) NEW INSTALLATION FEES: Passenger or freight elevator, escalator, moving walk: Up to and includins 550,000.00 of valuaron - 5350.00 Over 550,000.00 of valuation - S350.00 plus 56.00 for each 51,000.00 or fraction thereof over 550,000.00 Dumbwaiter or private residence elevator: Up to and includins 520,000.00 of valuation - S250.00 Over 520,000.00 of valuation - S250.00 plus 53.00 for each S1,000.00 or fraction thereof over 520,000.00 MAJOR ALTERATION FEES: Fe`s for major alterations shall be as set forth in Table 3-A of the Uniform Administrative Code or Tablc No. t -A of the Uniform Building Code. VALUATION $62,204.00 _ $652.82 54/4-y el c'k !s 4Q,M7r !2� Total Fee Date Paid Receipt T application Processed by: Approved by: w ^ Plan Review poroved bv: Elevator plan review and field inspections will be conducted by the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments. Plans will be forwarded to NWCCOG for review and approval. Schedule inspections by contacting the NWCCOG Elevator Inspector at (970) 468-0295 x 108. Please make checks payable to NWCCOG. Q001 5bti I BY r Mhtoin WUS of the Covered bridge March 12, 1997 H Michael McGee, Fire Marshal Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Via racsimile Dear Mike: NIVUN I A O 1 -WL 5- Ej OW 41'0 Z1 ib.k Z/ 12 Dan Stanek, Chief Building Official Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney Vail, Colorado In the course of planning for our building sprinkler retru(il scheduled for this spring, l met with Trevor Bradway this morning. Mr. Bradway is the owner of Mountain Haus units 101, 103, and 105. Mr. Bradway advised me that he docs not believe that the July 7, 1994 letter from the Town ol'Vail applies to his units, and that he does not intend to participate in the sprinkler retrofit this spring. As you know, the Mountain Haus Association has taken the position to cooperate in fidl with the retrofit, and all of our owners except Mr. Bradway, have agreed to participate. I would appreciate it if you respond in writing to the following points: 1) docs the 7/7/94 letter apply to the commercial units 101, 103, and 10.5; 2) if the letter does apply to units 101, 103 and 105, by what authority , and 3) if owner of 101, 103 and 105 does not install pipe and sprinkler heads in the interior of those units, what effect, if any, docs this have on the overall Mountain l laus Association project. Please address your response to both the Mountain Haus Condominium Association and Mr. Trevor Bradway. Please respond at your earliest convenience. The Mountain Haus plans to begin construction April 21, and we do not want anything to jeopardize the successful and timely execution of the project. Sincerely, S4 ndra F. Gray, CI IA General Manager cc: Mountain Ilaus Board of Managers Motuitain Haus 292 East Mvadnw Drive, Vail, Colorado 81657 • W0/476-2434 • FAX 970/476 --NW htip://v.iil.nct/mtnhaue • e mail: mthaus©aol.com • For Reservations: 800/237-0922 r WPI TOWN 42 [Vest Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2250 July 7, 1994 Mountain Haus Condominium Association c/o Sandy Gray 292 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Requirements for Existing Buildings Dear Mountain Haus Condominium Association: 1E Vail Tire Department As you may be aware, the Town of Vail Building Department and the Fire Department have been discussing issues pertaining to the Mountain Haus and retro -active requirements, especially the requirement for a fire sprinkler system. Town of Vail Municipal Code, Section 15.02, adopts the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code and the Uniform Building Code. Appendix I -A of the Fire Code and Appendix Chapter 1, Division 1, of the Building Code, contain the requirements for existing buildings other than a high rise. A "high rise" is generally defined as a building wherein the highest occupied floor is 75 feet or more above the lowest level of fire department access. Requirements for high rise buildings are listed in Division II of Chapter I in the appendix of the Building Code and in Appendix I -B of the Fire Code. In order to determine which set of requirements apply to the Mountain Haus, the elevation of the top floor lofts will need to be determined. Other potentially significant elements include but are not limited to, the presence of wood construction on the top floor and roof. The "light well" across from the elevator is also of significant concern in that there are windows that open into the light well, that the light well extends from the basement to the top floor, and that we have received a request from an architect to delete skylights in the top of the light well that appear to function as smoke vents. In the event that the loft units are shown to be 75 feet or more above grade, additional elements such as ventilation, the elevator, and emergency lighting become applicable. Ic Mountain Haus Page 2 The number of condominiums for which building permits have been issued this year, in conjunction with various other permits for the restaurant remodel, the asbestos abatement, and the proposed replacement/repair of the roof, have an aggregate effect as well as impacts on the spaces under construction. We had discussions with the previous general manager, architects, and other consulting engineering disciplines, related to the scope and design of a fire sprinkler system. The Fire Department did reach an agreement regarding the design of the fire sprinkler wherein fire sprinkler heads would be installed over 100% of the building. This agreement was made in lieu of requiring a single sprinkler head just inside the door of each condominium and the installation of a mechanical ventilation system designed for smoke control, and in lieu of trying to find some means to abate the impacts of the light well and the wood construction. We are still open to discussing this option or others you may wish to propose. However, the cited sections of the Municipal Code requires compliance within a three year period from the date of notification, noting that plans are to be submitted within 18 months of notification and completion is required within 18 months thereafter. This letter shall serve as official notification of the requirement for the Mountain Haus to comply with the provisions of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Section 15.02, specifically Appendix I -A and/or I -B of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Fire Code, and Chapter 1, Division I and/or Division II, of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building Code, within the prescribed timelines set forth therein. Please contact us if you wish to discuss these matters. We anticipate there will need to be some discussion in order to facilitate resolution of specific code related issues. Sincerely, Michael McGee McGee Fire Marshal (3 03) 479-2135 Gary Irrain Chief Building Official (303) 479-2138 cc: Chief Duran, Vail Fire Department Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney I WN|/REPT131 OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 17 |06/24/97 08:10 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR: 6/24/97 AREA: EG ================================================================================ Activity: E97-0014 6/24/97 Type: B—ELEC Status: ISSUED Constr: ACOM Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS 292 E. MEADOW DR Parcel: 2101-082-28-000 Occ: Use: Description: COMMON AREAS IMPROVEMENTS Applicant: RIVIERA ELECTRIC CONST., CO Phone: 949-6095 Owner: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC Phone: 476-2434 Contractor: RIVIERA ELECTRIC CONST., CO Phone: 949-6095 ________________________________________________________________________________ Inspection Request Requestor: KIM Req Time: 08:00 Items requested to 00190 ELEC—Final Information..... Phone: 949-6095 Comments: CEILING IST FLOOR be Inspected... Action Comments Time Exp ________________________________________________________________________________ Inspection History..... � Item: 00110 ELEC—Temp. Power'' ' Item: 00120 ELEC—Rough 05/15/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR ceiling 4th floor 05/21/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR 5th floor ceiling 05/27/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR APPROVED 06/04/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR 2nd floor 06/06/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR 1st floor Item: 00130 ELEC—Conduit Item: 00140 ELEC—Misc. Item: 00190 ELEC—Final 06/11/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR 4th —5th floor 06/16/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR ceiling 6th floor 06/20/97 Inspector: EG Action: APPR 5th -6th final3rd-2ndceil REPT1: TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO 06A5J 99 14:08 REQUEST INSPECTN WORK SHEETS FOR 125/1999 PAGE AREA: DS Activity: B97-0015 6/25/19 Type: A -COMM Status: ISSUED Constr: ACOM Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Item: 00030 BLDG -Framing Parcel: 2101-082-28-000 Occ: Use: II FR Description: COMMON AREAS REMODEL AND FIRE SUPRESSION SYS Applicant: HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Phone: 3038251313 Owner: MOUNTAIN HAUS CONDO ASSOC Phone: 476-2434 Contractor: -------------------------------------- HYDER CONSTRUCTION, INC Phone: ------------------------------------------- 3038251313 Inspection Request Information..... Requestor: STEPHANIE Phone: 476-6342 Req Time: 08:00 Comments: Items requested to be Inspected... Action Comments 00540 BLDG -Final C/O =_%*_ ___Lt__ %*_ Time Exp – - – – – – – – ------t-- – – – – — -------------------- -- Inspection History ..... Item: 00030 BLDG -Framing 05/14/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 4TH FLOOR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/19197 Inspector: DS Action: PA 4TH FLOOR ONLY (65/23/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 5TH FLOOR CORRIDOR ONLY 05/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 3rd floor only (65/28/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 6TH FLOOR ONLY 05/30/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN 2ND FLOOR NOT READY 06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 3RD FLOOR, ATRIUM 6TH 06/05/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN CANCELLED 06/06/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR FIRST FLOOR Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail 05/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 5th floor only 05/30/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 6TH FLOOR ONLY 06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 2ND FLOOR ONLY 06/06/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 2ND FLOOR 06/11/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR (RST FLOOR ONLY Item: 00090 BLDG -Final Item: 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O 06/27/97 Inspector: DS Action: DN NOT READY 06/30/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR CORRIDORS THROUGHOUT Notes: AS PER LETTER DATED MAY 27,1997, SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED IN CORRIDORES BY 11-15-97 12/02/97 Inspector: CD Action: APPR GOOD UNTIL 5/1/98 Notes: SMOKE/FIRE DAMPERS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND ARE OPERATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ISSUES MUST BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO A FINAL C. O. BEING ISSUED 12/05/97 Inspector: CD Action: APPR GOOD UNTIL 5/1/98 Notes: TCO ONLY IS APPROVED. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETE THROUGHOUT BUILDING, UNITS 101, 103, 105 NOT COMPL AT THIS POINT Item: 00531 FIRE -TEMP. C/O Item: 0053:3 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item: 00537 PLAN -FINAL L/O Item: 005-38 FIRE -FINAL C/O Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O 11/21/97 Inspector: JRM Action: DN CANCELLED Printed by Charlie Davis 6/25/99 2:17pm --�W— 4 --------------------- --------- A From: Mike Mcgee 1w To: Gary Goodell Subject: FINAL CO FOR MOUNTAIN HAUS --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====---------==6/24/99==4:38pm== CC: BLDGDIV GROUP, DRT GROUP, FIRE_DEPT GROUP, Pam Brandmeyer, Tom Moorhead ....................................... AS OF 06/24/99, 100% OF THE MOUNTAIN HAUS HAS AN OPERATIONAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, DULY INSPECTED AND TESTED, INCLUDING SUITES ON THE 1ST FLOOR WEST END. THERE ARE NO OUTSTANDING ISSUES PENDING FOR THE FIRE DEPT IN REGARDS FOR ISSUING A FINAL CO. Page: 1 n n H yroro r yry � vi to [ y 1 nl 3 [ 1 OH °z o l7 �C n O V i Oi � Y• W x77 •zi H CA tn\ NC Y H M -i O w l i 0 y I not H I \ d ttzi ODD 0 i M ttv 3 A7 N M 1 N H l7 t7 .b 1 r uo "o W Y M I I I r H n 1 ;a M I vl n x N x I H N I o a H t7 C N N H i O m ro z m n w w Z tl I I I I N O b w ID \ y o O J n I I ci co d H M N b I x M� 1-1 d r \ 1 1 1 1 4 r ro \ O ID H tj w a M M n En M pq J 100 \ 1 1 EO O N 1 1 I ty H 1 y y ro to M W M I I h] M r to d 1pa J 1 1 J I J 1 d tq M 1 b {!1 1 1 V1 1 U1 M 1 O n o l l o l o ro 1 M O 5 I 1 O I I I• 0 1 0 1 00 m 1 H 'L• O 1 I O I O 1 �y H C y I I I I H H b I d i y y q M I M I 1 O 0 co I VI U1 1 V1 i o i l o i o i C 'il l o f l o l o II 1 I4 HC4 � I 0 0 1 1 1 I J J I J y In i y i 3 00 i' o o g H 3 I y I oll olo 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I.J H 1 I I I I I M i 1 i I 1 1 1 1 l y xl 1 1 1 • M I Q f oll 0 o l l 1 1 0 1 0 1 d J o y o I 1 M 0 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 Y FOWN OF VAIL 15 S. FRONTAGE ROAD JAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ADD/ALT COMM BUILD PERMT Permit #: B96-0346 Job Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Status...: ISSUED Location...: MOUNTAIN HAUS UNIT # 1 Applied..: 11/04/1996 Parcel No..: 2101-082-28-074 Issued...: Project No.: PRJ96-0193 Expires..: APPLICANT GLENDINING ENTERPRISES Phone: 476-2656 P.O. BOX 1738, AVON, CO 81620 CONTRACTOR GLENDINING ENTERPRISES Phone: 476-2656 P.O. BOX 1738, AVON, CO 81620 OWNER MEDSKER PARTNERSHIP LTD 333 W HAMPDEN AVE STE 500, ENGLEWOOD CO 80110 Description: REMODEL BAR AND RESTARUANT Occupancy: B2 B2 Type Construction: II FR Type II Fire Resistive Type Occupancy: Valuation: 18,500 Add Sq Ft: Fireplace Information: Restricted: NOf Gas Appliances: NOf Gas Logs: NOf Wood/Pallet: t********************************************************** FEE SUMMARY********************************************************** Building-----> 235.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> .00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 725.75 Plan Check --- > 152.75 DRB Fee-----------------> .00 Additional Fees --------- > .00 Investigation> 235.00 Recreation Fee ---------- > .00 Total Permit Fee--------> 725.75 Will Call ---- > 3.00 Clean -Up Deposit--------> 100.00 Payments ---------------- > 725.75 TOTAL FEES--------------> 725.75 BALANCE DUE ------------- > .00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT De t: BUILDING Division: 11/04/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR CHARLIE DAVI Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dept: PLANNING Division: Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division: 11 04/CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS Dept: PUB WORK Division: 11/04/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A ********************************************************************************************************************************** See Page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure accordto the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of he T n ' ap Licable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEP AT 479- 38 OR AnUR OFFICE FPOM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM Send Clean -Up Deposit To: JAMES GLENDINING ENTERPRISES SYG�AkORE OF�OWN 04 t-dNTIMCTOR FIOR HIM WNER o ******************************************************************************** CONDITIONS Permit #: B96-0346 as of 11/04/96 Status: ISSUED ******************************************************************************** Permit Type: ADD/ALT COMM BUILD PERMT Applicant: GLENDINING ENTERPRISES 476-2656 Job Address: Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS UNIT # 1 Parcel No: 2101-082-28-074 Description: REMODEL BAR AND RESTARUANT Applied: 11/04/1996 Issued: To Expire: Conditions: 1. FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. 2. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. 3. FIRE DEPT AND HEALTH DEPT INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D PRIOR TO A BUILDING FINAL BEING DONE L O TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt **************************************************************** Statemnt Number: REC-0227 Amount: 725.75 11/04/96 14:34 Payment Method: ---------------------------------------------------------------- CK Notation: #1051 Init: CD Permit No: B96-0346 Type: A -COMM ADD/ALT COMM BUILD P Parcel No: 2101-082-28-074 Site Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS UNIT # 1 Total Fees: 725.75 This Payment 725.75 Total ALL Pmts: 725.75 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount O1 0000 41310 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 235.00 O1 0000 41332 PLAN CHECK FEES 152.75 O1 0000 22002 CLEANUP DEPOSITS 100.00 O1 0000 41336 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 O1 0000 42371 ---------------------------------------------------------------- INVESTIGATION FEE (BLDG) 235.00 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 0 0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES PLUMBING PERMIT Job Address: Location.... Parcel No..: Project No.: 292 E MEADOW DR MOUNTAIN HAUS 2101-082-28-074 PRJ96-0193 Permit #: P96-0189 Status...: ISSUED Applied..: 11/04/1996 Issued...: 11/04/1996 Expires..: 05/03/1997 APPLICANT DILLON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. Phone: 468-5705 P.O. DRAWER 4003, DILLON, CO 80435 CONTRACTOR. DILLON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. Phone: 468-5705 P.O. DRAWER 4003, DILLON, CO 80435 OWNER MEDSKER PARTNERSHIP LTD 333 W HAMPDEN AVE STE 500, ENGLEWOOD CO 80110 Description: ADD FLOOR DRAIN TO REST. Valuation: 3,200.00 *********************************************************** FEE SUMMARY ********************************************************** Plumbing-----> 60.00 Restuarant Plan Review--> .00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 78.00 Plan Check --- > 15.00 TOTAL FEES--------------> 78.00 Additional Fees --------- > .00 Investigation> .00 Total Permit Fee--------> 78.00 Will Call ---- > 3.00 Payments ---------------- > 78.00 BALANCE DUE ------------- > .00 Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division: 11/04/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR CHARLIE DAVIS Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division: 11/04/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A ********************************************************************************************************************************** CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. ********************************************************************************************************************************** DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state Laws, and to build this structure ccordin the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of th TC479-213 pli Le thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHO AT 1AT 0 R OFQCE FROM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM SIGNA OF OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER **************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt **************************************************************** Statemnt Number: REC-0227 Amount: 78.00 11/04/96 14:33 Payment Method: CK Notation: #1051 Init: CD ---------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: P96-0189 Type: B-PLMB PLUMBING PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-082-28-074 Site Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS Total Fees: 78.00 This Payment 78.00 Total ALL Pmts: 78.00 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount O1 0000 41311 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 60.00 O1 0000 41332 PLAN CHECK FEES 15.00 O1 0000 41336 ---------------------------------------------------------------- WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 c. o DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ELECTRICAL PERMIT Job Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location...: MOUNTAIN HAUS UNIT 1 Parcel No..: 2101-082-28-074 Project No.: PRJ96-0193 APPLICANT OLD ELECTRIC P 0 BOX 490, MINTURN CO 81645 CONTRACTOR OLD ELECTRIC P 0 BOX 490, MINTURN CO 81645 OWNER MEDSKER PARTNERSHIP LTD Permit #: E96-0283 Status...: ISSUED Applied..: 11/04/1.996 Issued...: 11/04/1996 Expires..: 05/03/1997 Phone: 3038275918 Phone: 3038275918 333 W HAMPDEN AVE STE 500, ENGLEWOOD CO 80110 Description: ADD LIGHTS TO REST. Valuation: 7,500.00 *********************************************************** FEE SUMMARY********************************************************** Electrical --- > 144.00 Total Calculated Fees --- > 147.00 DRB Fee ---> .00 Additional Fees --------- > .00 Investigation> .00 Total Permit Fee--------> 147.00 Will Call ---- > 3.00 Payments ---------------- > 147.00 TOTAL FEES --- > 147.00 BALANCE DUE ------------- > .00 ********************************************************************************************************************************** Item: 06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division: 11/04/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR FOR ERNSTR Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division: 11/04/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A ********************************************************************************************************************************** CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. ********************************************************************************************************************************** DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEP ONE A -2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM 5:00 PM SI NATU OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER **************************************************************** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statemnt **************************************************************** Statemnt Number: REC-0227 Amount: 147.00 11/04/96 14:32 Payment Method: ---------------------------------------------------------------- CK Notation: #1051 Init: CD Permit No: E96-0283 Type: B-ELEC ELECTRICAL PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-082-28-074 Site Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS UNIT 1 Total Fees: 147.00 This Payment 147.00 Total ALL Pmts: 147.00 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 01 0000 41313 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 144.00 01 0000 41336 ---------------------------------------------------------------- WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 '*Cont,-ct Eagle County Asses s Office tat 970-328-8640 for Parcel it. TOWN OF VAIL CONSTRUCTION PARCEL #: PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ; �6-0 " --oZ _ DATE://- y q& PERMIT #F APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED ***************************** PERMIT INFORMATION **************************** Building 'vq-Plumbing N -Electrical [ ]-Mechanical [ ]-Other Job Name: _ Wca Job Address: �q2 "1t)(,A6W b Ute;+ Legal Description: Lot Block Filing SUBDIVISION: Owners Name:Ar-i Es G-it-_tjb u.j cAddress: \icc) .Ph.149-cA�t0 Architect: Address: Ph. General Description: %�-AyL.n n N�V\j ��c-uz� ��! ..� ��,�F Work Class: L [ )'New Alteration [ )-Additional )-Repair [ ]-Other Number of Dwelling Units: Number of Accommodation Units: N mber and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances Gas Logs Wood/Pellet PS VALUATI=Tlo�-******************************** 3 q62 0 -7�`t50c) O�3 BUILDING: $ ELECTRICAL: $ �•�C^,� OTHER: $ PLUMBING: $ ?ca MECHANICAL:* TOTAL: $ X************************* CONTRACTOR INFORMATION *************************** eneralContractor: ��41-1cm S (, , fjj PV E 4 W-, ...pz%taXown of Vail Reg. NO. Address: �.v. ��;is Llvcr.� c o a,1 l-.? Phone Number: O(L�c, - c Z10 Electrical Contractor: C j , �tGtG 7 i c'� i 4COU�vi MR of voily 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-21.38 or 479-2139 office of community development TO: ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL FROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MARCH 16, 1988 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE In summary, Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or material, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public place or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on all Town of Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft. off pavement. This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail Public Works Department. Persons found violating this ordinance will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material. In the event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the 24 hour time specified, the Public Works Department will remove said material at the expense of person notified. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be applicable to construction, maintenance or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities in the right -a -way. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town of Vail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Red and� ow dged by: )e os-1,Vion/xelationship to Project (i.e. contractor, owner) Date Q, town of-Wou 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 office of community development BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works) review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as long as three weeks. All commercial (large or small) and all multi -family permits will have to follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with regard to necessary review, these projects may also take the three week period, Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible. I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. X -� V\L � �O Project Name X—Date Work Sheet was turned into the Community Develoemont Department. IN MEMORANDUM TO: ALL CONTRACTORS FROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 9, 1994 RE: WHEN A "PUBLIC WAY PERMIT' IS REQUIRED Job Name: Date: i t - i — c7 Please answer the following questionnaire regarding the need for a "Public Way Permit": YES 1) Is this a new residence? 2) Is demolition work being performed that requires the use of the right of way, easements or public property? 3) Is any utility work needed? 4) Is the driveway being repaved? 5) Is different access needed to site other than existing driveway? 6) Is any drainage work being done affecting the right of way, easements, or public property? 7) Is a "Revocable Right Of Way Permit" required? 8) A. Is the right of way, easements or public property to be used for staging, parking or fencing? B. If no to 8A, is a parking, staging or fencing plan required by Community Development? NO If you answered yes to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permit" must be obtained. "Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's office or at Community Development. If you have any questions please call Charlie Davis, the Town of Vail Construction Inspector, at 479-2158. I have read and answered alf, the 7Nc C, Co��, Job Name que%ions. Signature A Date \\ k\ c -A PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT PROCESS How it relates to Building Permits: 1) Fill out our check list provided with a building permit application. If yes was answered to any of the above questions then a "Public Way" is required. You can pick up an application at either Community Development, located at 75 S. Frontage Road or Public Works, located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive. 2) Notice sign offs for utility companies. All utilities must field verify (locate) respective utilities prior to signing application. Some utility companies require up to a 48 hour notice to schedule a locate. 3) A construction traffic control/staging plan must be prepared on a separate sheet of paper -An approved site plan may also be used. This plan will show locations of all traffic control devices(signs, cones, etc..) and the work zone, (area of Construction, Staging, etc..). This plan will expire on Oct. 15th. and will need to be resubmitted for approval through the winter. 4) Sketch of work being performed must be submitted indicating dimensions (length, width & depth of work). This may be drawn on the traffic control plan or a site plan for the job. 5) Submit completed application to the Public Works's office for review. If required, locates will be scheduled for the Town of Vail Electricians and Irrigation crew. The locates take place in the morning but, may require up to 48 hours to perform. 6) The Public Work's Construction Inspector will review the application and approve or disapprove the permit. You will be contacted as to the status and any that may needed. Most permits are released within 48 hours of being received, but please allow up to one week to process. 7) As soon as the permit is processed, a copy will be faxed to Community Development allowing the "Building Permit" to be released. Please do not confuse the "Public Way Permit" with a "Building Permit" to do work on a project itself. NOTE: * The above. process is for work in a public way only. * Public Way Permits are valid only until November 15th. * A new Public Way Permit is required each year if work is not complete. cd/pway a" d TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Department of Community Development Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21381479-2139 FAX 303-479-2452 INFORMATION NEEDED WHEN APPLYING FOR A MECHANICAL PERMIT 1. HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS. 2. TO SCALE FLOOR PLAN OF MECHANICAL ROOM WITH EQUIPMENT DRAWN IN TO SCALE, WITH PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS AND BTU RATINGS OF ALL EQUIPMENT IN MECHANICAL ROOM. 3. SHOW SIZE AND LOCATION OF COMBUSTION AIR DUCTS, FLUES, VENT CONNECTORS AND GAS LINES. 4. NOTE WHETHER ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT WILL ALSO BE INSTALLED IN MECHANICAL ROOM. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION WILL DELAY YOUR PERMIT. tows IM 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303)479-2138 (303) 479-2139 office of community development NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS/OWNER BUILDERS Effective June 20, 1991, the Town of Vail Building Department has developed the following procedures to ensure that new construction sites have adequately established proper drainage from building sites along and adjacent to Town of Vail roads or streets. The Town of Vail Public Works Department will be required to inspect and approve drainage adjacent to Town of Vail roads or streets and the installation of temporary or permanent culverts at access points from the road or street on to the construction site. Such approval must be obtained prior to any request for inspection by the Town of Vail Building Department for footings or temporary electrical or any other inspection. Please call 479-2160 to request an inspection from the Public Works Department. Allow a minimum of 24 hour notice. Also, the Town of Vail Public Works Department will be approving all final drainage and culvert installation with resulting road patching as necessary. Such approval must be obtained prior to Final Certificate of Occupancy issuance. REPT 131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 18 11/13/96 06:44 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION ================================================================================ WORK SHEETS FOR:11/13/96 AREA: CF Activity: B96-0346 11/13/96 Type: A -COMM Status: ISSUED Constr: ACOM Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS UNIT # 1 Parcel: 2101-082-28-074 Occ: Use: II FR Description: REMODEL BAR AND RESTARUANT Applicant: GLENDINING ENTERPRISES Phone: 476-2656 Item: Owner: MEDSKER PARTNERSHIP LTD Phone: Item: Contractor: ---------------------------------------------------- GLENDINING ENTERPRISES Phone; 476-2656 I --------------------------� Item: Locks, Holds, and Notices.... ACTIVITY Notice: BALENCE OF $10 IS REQ'D ----------------------------------- Inspection Request Information..... Requestor: JIM GLENDENING Phone: 476-2656 Req Time: 08:00 Comments: BAR - ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING AS WELL Items requested to be Inspected... Action Comments Time Exp 00090 BLDG -Final ----------- Inspection History...�. Item: 00510 driveway grade final Item: 00010 BLDG-Footings/Steel Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel Item: 00520 PLAN -ILC Site Plan Item: 00030 BLDG -Framing Item: 00040 * * Not On File * * Item: 00050 BLDG -Insulation Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail Item: 00080 * * Not On File * * Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc. Item: 00090 BLDG -Final Item: 00530 BLDG -Temp. C/O Item: 00531 FIRE -TEMP. C/O Item: 00532 PW -TEMP. C/O Item: 00533 PLAN -TEMP. C/O Item: 00537 PLAN -FINAL C/O ltem: 00538 FIRE -FINAL C/O Item: 00539 PW -FINAL C/O --` Item: 00540 BLDG -Final C/O ^ 0 REPT131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 19 11/13/96 06:44 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR:11/13/96 ================================================================================ AREA: CF Activity: P96-0189 11/13/96 Type: B—PLMB Status: ISSUED Constr: ACOM Address: 292 E MEADOW DR Location: MOUNTAIN HAUS Parcel: 2101-082-28-074 Occ: Use: Description: ADD FLOOR DRAIN TO REST. Applicant: DILLON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. Phone: 468-5705 Owner: MEDSKER PARTNERSHIP LTD Phone: Contractor: DILLON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. Phone: 468-5705 ________________________________________________________________________ Inspection Request Information..... ' Requestor: JIM GLENDENING Phone: 476-2656 Req Time: 08:00 Comments: BAR — ELECTRICAL & BUILDING AS WELL - Items requested to be Inspected... Action Comments Time Exp 00290 PLMB—Final ---- _____________________________________________________________________ Inspection History..... Item: 00210 PLMB—Underground Item: 00220 PLMB—Rough/D.W.V. r. Item: 00225 FIRE—SPRINKLER ROUGH Item: 00230 PLMB—Rough/Water Item: 00240 PLMB—Gas Piping Item: 00250 PLMB_Pool/Hot Tub Item: 00260 PLMB—Misc. Item: 00290 PLMB—Final Item: 00538 FIRE—FINAL C/O H"ct0 �LPK4 r& -e9 S�►+cc __._ � Paid _ C:k. 1'14. _ _____._._.,. Nppt 4 CI-II'CK R Q UL PREPARIs'D BY: DATE: VENDOR NAME: VENDOR NUMBER: DESCRIPTION OF EXPENSE: CLEANUP DEPOSIT REF UND FOR BP it NAME OF JOB:mi .-..z ACCOUNT NUMBER: 01 0000 22002 AMOUNT OF REFUND: Dl�_C ' DATE APPROVED: APPROVAL SIGNATURE; sa A` a A� sin own WN MOO" qn, not an �0& Aann, NOT TYRO' A N"14 " t 4 . , 1, I �� ', I - - , - " r -h I- - - 7, " � 1 " 1 1'', "I i �t ',� A, ; moo _--alwj W, -1 a-, �, - too W e"", " T", ! " , W Stw 0, .. .. .. ..... MW I -n -Al I,n Sol y A "CONK -M V10%va" my, 4r, � - - T- tat Ogg, tX04. q Los. &Manxis - sow I aw own to n No no mm; list Rod 4 Aswim-" oil if Wj,,M, "It 'io AOcNNN do. -AIN Ihot' CIA AV -an 0-1 a a' tat, pow; 4n�z IT .0 �T. 0 0o IMAM Wk opt. Yoe, 1 mom 14 - t 1 1 1 � I . 111,n,,�;74�:T� = xyvvsa�, � I ; wts. Va WIN W I.To W1 � - , - 1, , � l. l- it I philn; WON,' ; %V11, -1 1- � � � QW--, wil- -0-1mly OWN n-"Va I A"W-k '"If Nev.. na CA- Q MI M, ion 1 1, - 1, 0-: W"A Qq its AQ Z41 atown. go- Z Twos 12A�yv Z vow Awl up won" -1 -, n �" -50 g -_w ONE "y it - ". .1 No- - I " -A, I -not own wo took OKA 0 4; "N' "n Ways Ink,- , 11 X -" -, " -a . il J, -long to ovum WWI I AliI -. V 11, n A"WNW- ONO%& on 11 q 0 Koo 454yu -it Novi n P I W � n� jo , , q -j q *&- ; 0- 1 " , , 1 " L lot * ,, , , F�', � y ang VA sin �� 4,�_ �, IVIA -Ali its, low wool ain% 9WWAIN loll OVA 'Alan lama-, too cam 0 -on too ISol- its. 01 r -VO top FAR "A Ink 4' 7* now? n. "I Uzi, owl "Yywfm� ain. Zo psi As aQN y0l Lot ANY"! too KAN, ph 0 "Woo AWSMA"A" mum loot A"A - 1 , , I , VOW, -MOP �r" jnk"&"V"� CAM -hot, two, 00 ''to oil WWI yttaw awl, AI WWI w, Too A', W tow - 0 am A - �TVNT vm� ay -OAS aim a�0 aI--pay X Qw" a -inn: Mo's -01 Ili 4MMU Too V" won of �QNKX -TWO W" -M Mug, " V -- -, whom" A ill 1 -1 IFOV W, AV410 For 0- jMM"P. y MAU, a! owl won W. fft mom top, wow Ll age liar .10 my- v kx- tow." gym QQq moo af!L "vPMA aim. ins vow" an "Vol- V1 aw A�T JA YIN IMR Piz W oat 1 1 "y"j, VO 1. AM Fly! Ihot l Amoo. nq I qw- no if -ayi!; -j" "owls POT 11, 1 At W -V' in. wyo, VOL nn ng 1 mm MUM 0 Y A= wows 6,00 own XX V1. is, My A �h &Won A -oil NY oil 0 t too MIS 001A NMI y of 4 VAN , a wpm, W v --V 7 WASIMM ?-Axajok, ....... ON ,4 r v , r f x _ ''f ?-.- 1#° s°� +.t4 #. i�.w4.?'., P: . cllr� OF . ) a . BATH qp $ ,.. .,:. ..: .. MEMBERS PRESENT Greg Moffet Greg Amsden Henry Pratt Galen Aasland John Schofield Gene Uselton Diane Golden Public Hearing PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION October 28, 1996 Minutes MEMBERS ABSENT: John Schofield The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:00 p.m. STAFF PRESENT: Mike Mollica Andy Knudtsen George Ruther Dominic Mauriello Dirk Mason Tom Moorhead Judy Rodriguez 2:00 p.m. j 1. .A request for an exterior addition to a master bedroom and bathroom and adding a 3rd floor, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 802B Potato Patch/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch. Applicants: Padraic Deighan and Birgit Toome Planner: Dominic Mauriello Dominic Mauriello gave an overview of the request. Staff believes there will be minimal impacts involved with this request and recommends approval with no conditions. Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add. He did not. Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. There were none. Galen Aasland said the applicants had made the changes that the PEC required. Diane Golden agreed with Galen. Henry Pratt also agreed with Galen. Gene Uselton asked for clarification regarding the landscaping requirement. Greg Amsden had no further comments. Greg Moffet had no comments. Henry Pratt made a motion for approval in accordance with the findings in the staff memo. The motion was seconded by Greg Amsden. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes October 28, 1996 1 •�rl� APPROVEDNOV 2 5 Iggg it passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0. 2. A request for a sign variance to allow for a freestanding sign for an individual business in a multi -tenant building, located at Mountain Haus, 292 E. Meadow Drive/a portion of Block 5, Vail Village First Filing Applicant: Leslie and James Glendining Planner: Dirk Mason Dirk Mason gave an overview of the request. He said that staff was recommending approval with 3 conditions attached to that approval. Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add. The applicant had nothing to add. Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was none. Gene Uselton had no comments. Greg Amsden had no comments. Galen Aasland noted that this business location has been historically unprofitable and he suggested that the PEC give the owner any benefits possible to help. Diane Golden had no comments. Henry Pratt agreed with Galen to give as much exposure as possible to this business. He asked if the applicant could move the sign to the planter location? Mike Mollica said staff hadn't reviewed with the landscaping crew if this would be possible. An issue might arise regarding the irrigation system in the planter. Dirk Mason said a letter would be needed from the Mountain House Association to change to this location. Greg Moffet was in favor of the sign in a more prominent location. Henry Pratt made a motion in accordance with the staff memo, with the addition of a 4th condition to allow the sign further out into the planter if desired by the applicant. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0. 3. A request for a common area variance and a site coverage variance to allow for the conversion of one interior parking space to common area, located at 200 Vail Road/Part of Lots A, B and C, Block 5C, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Lodge Tower Condominium Association, represented by Stan Cope Planner: Dominic Mauriello Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes October 28, 1996 2 TOWN OF VAIL 42 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2250 MEMORANDUM TO: GARY MURRAIN, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: MICHAEL MCGEE, FIRE MARSHAL DATE: MAY 11, 1995 RE: REROOF OF MOUNTAIN HAUS Vail Fire Department We have reviewed the plans for the proposed reroof of the Mountain Haus. Last year I had a discussion with Ken Wentworth who was working for Morter Architects at the time, regarding the skylights. The proposed plan indicates they intend to replace the skylights but does not specify with what. The existing skylights are the "fusible" type that are designed to melt in the event of a fire. While the plans lack sufficient detail to determine the exact location of the "skylights" with respect to the interior, it is my understanding that by looking at the plans, the skylights st issue are directly over the lightwell across from the elevator. As you may recall, the lightwell is an unrated shaft, unprotected by sprinklers, that has non -rated bedroom windows that open into the lightwell on each floor. In the absence of a fire sprinkler system throughout the building, I am uncomfortable with the removal of these "vents" unless an equivalent option is installed. Category Number. Project Name: Building Name: Design Review Action Form TOWN OF VAIL Date HI 'q5 Project Description:-VlLk(g' �r YYl/k l ! �A ii(� '1r liyxVVA (f� Aul mj iry ) 4Lv pA, /,ge�� In11 raw . U V ; ll4t'i) 4 b ij- Owner, Address and Phone: M 1'r R A 4, e ICD A- Y"A Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Subdivision t" un% A i'o H rA u y Zone District _ Project Street Address: �1 % C-, A&W V" Comments: J."I_(" I�1 I.P_, All", 1A) 11' iMI th i:� # ;/ i') & -iceL Board / Staff Action Motion by: Seconded by: ❑ Approval ❑ Disapproval F� Staff Approval Conditions: Town Planner Date: � - 1' q C5— Vote: DRB Fee Pre -paid I'�w 0 revised 7/14/94 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF DRB MEETING: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE SCHEDULED FOR REVIEW. I. PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION: P'(2a � B. TYPE OF REVIEW: New Construction ($200.00) _Minor Alteration ($20.00) Addition ($50.00) Conceptual Review ($0) C. ADDRESS: WAACIA3 D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot Block Subdivision Mi�l)l frA AA 7Q1,IS If property is described by a meets and bounds legal description, please provide on a separate sheet and attach to this application. E. ZONING: VA F. NAME OF APPLICANT: M ( C5pZwt Mailing Address: 1P0,rV_ kile4�Ktp x9 k- �( z Phone izi z)i� G. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mailing Address: .P2`C Phone H. NAME OF OWNER (S) �Itpo h'bP.tro' OWNER (S) SIGNATURE: Mailing Address: Phone APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OWNER'S SIGNATURE I. Condominium Approval if applicable. J. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,�are to be paid at the time of submittal of the DRB appli ation. Later, when applying for a building permit, please identify the accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the table below, to ensure the correct fee is paid. FEE PAID: $ CHECK ##• DATE: BY: FEE SCHEDULE: VALUATION FEE 1p v $ 10,00i M �p L , vvv - $ 50,000 $ 20.00 $ 50.00 $ 50,001 - $ 150,000 $100.00 $150,001 - $ 500,000 $200.00 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $400.00 $ Over $1,000,000 $500.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL EXPIRES ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL APPROVAL UNLESS A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED. 1 II. PRE -APPLICATION MEETING: A pre -application meeting with a member of the planning staff is encouraged to determine if any additional application information is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to determine if there are additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamline the review process for your project. III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate property lines, building lines and building corners. All trees to be removed must be taped. All site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a conceptual review and a final review. C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not asked in advance that.discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB agenda until such time as the item has been republished. D. The following items may, at the discretion of the zoning administrator, be approved by the Community Development Department staff (i.e. a formal hearing before the DRB may not be required): a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changes which do not alter the existing plane of the building; and. b. Building additions not visible from any other lot or public space. At the time such a proposal is submitted, applicants must include letters from adjacent property owners and/or from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association stating the association approves of the addition. E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow, wetland, etc.), a hazard study must be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard report prior to the issuance of a building permit. Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Planner prior to DRB application to determine the relationship of the property to all mapped hazards. F. For all residential construction: a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the inside face of the exterior structural walls of the building; and JD. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a four foot distance from the exterior face of the building walls or supporting columns. G. If DRB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be addressed prior to the application for a building permit. K TOWN OF, VAIL COPS -DEV I:,`-03-479-2452 DEC ' 94 10:52 No.001 P.01 • Application Date A. 9.. DRB MEETING DATE DEC i 11994 APPLICATION FOR A SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA'iOMA DE v, Lit V W I. Procedures for applying for a satellite dish antenna are outlined in Ordinance #9 of.1985. Details of these procedures are available from the Department of Community Development. Applicants are encouraged to contact the Department of Cormunity Development for additional information concerning submitted requests, review criteria, and the approval process. .All 'Al/. /I r? i i A. NAME OF APPLICA NT �If, / P1 ADDRESS S J PHONE JD✓� �7� ��3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • � 66 B. NAME OF APPLICANTS REPRE ENTATIVES C /`�, �rl� �soit N /ooaa . ADDRESS PHONE T C. NAME OF OWNER(S) t SIGNATURE `:� / D. List of names and addresse-�/Of all property adjac t.to the subject property including property behind and accross treets and their mailing addresses. The applicant is respons le for correct mailing addresses. AS OUTLINED IN ORDINANCE #9, 1985, NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY 014NERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REVIEW OF ANY APPLICATIONS BY THE DESIGN REVIE14 BOARD. FOR THIS REASOY, COMPLETE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SU8Mi7TE'D TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COKMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 21 DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING. J' 0 z O _ D m O � C7 zm -i _ Z O n � r C) z D O � C) m zm D q D� O D n � r O Z O -i m ;oz D m O D � C7 � m m D O CIDcn z m •• H M m L7 C) D m r r O m O M m O A m p v C) - CDto m m m m m m n m m n D I- 3 m �-K m O m* m* ° m* D J Z 3 m Z O G7 C Z Z D Z r- Z z O 1 c D z a C/] D D A) cD a0 r OV Z Z O O L7 O m Z 00 n O O� n v m cn m r- m x a D D V D d v OC D � < m N D D C H N � r I r CID W O r -1< Cm r r N r C7 O C O � C9 A 0- n X) m V VO M a m m m z cn Oo 0 c: cl- d Z y z m r p p ci -- o O z O z r z o O to �p cD z o z O u; O �, cn o z W V] O � o � 3cnCD�� O I< = C) � � _ c _' o 41 c ul Z y p D O _ _ z x �cn o --o - C' Z o cn m � n p D r C�7 CO m C w r a d o z = w x _a 0 (DC z d ❑❑❑ m O T m x m D z > O m � m C7 O 7 � O m m O co m x m v O z C- 0 O co m �G , m D m O m 0< O x � _ Z m o Z m m N v C) - CDto O cn m m m Om m r 2 r m m O .�CD O S G CD ° D J Z G7 C (D N (D3 (D CD L7 D r- O z O 1 c D a C/] v O O D m A) cD a0 r Z Z m L7 C m Z 00 n O� n v m cn m r- m CD D v OC � < m N —0 CID W O -1< Cm z O � C9 A 0- n z cn 0 c: cl- d z m z D o O O m z z -- o O D a O to �p cD m O m o V] O � � 3cnCD�� O I< = C) � � _ D _' o 41 c Z y p D O - DCO N o --o - C' Z o cn m � n p D r C�7 CO m C w r a d o z = w x _a 0 (DC z D A _ < �' a (D z D r v < n n 7 O O N Dvi r �I m v D 3 w ,�.. a CD a� Gt y r r C N D O - CL :rm z CL a' D) N W co ' m DVALUATION �D o v z a O U) m o m m r OO -i D O -i .» N =` Z z pl O I I Z D R' D v f7 n z r" 3 v m W � Q O O J 7 m f>° p C) D z z D D z W v O O O C m r = C7 3 I O H v X m v z O 0 D m OT. L7 D O to O= 3 mkCD c z T I Z n T7 < m z > m z z O n GZi Z O N -o (D mm d a O ' r 4 cn I l uJ D � v O m m v D r D �O ZD r -� N w m .:o z o� x I m m amc°so_ om � O m -Oa—< m N O CD O * C a� z` D) cn I �� m o p �• O �• � I I tmy m U) CD D ' T. a-0 O ° �C-) :3 m p N C m d O= DI 4CID d C to A� n- CD m I v =0 (D as --o o0.CD I n m�a m � � m D z > O m � m C7 O 7 � O m m O co m x m v O z C- 0 O co m �G , 4v --w i&Vplltlb I41W O > (n n O n O n O n O m n O D O o f Z 1 — 1 ,� m D Z O Z n -4 Z r -1 C Z m Z m '__jC7 D * Z O CO m m N G7 U) D m _ D D DCD 0 D D m SM I ZC7 D D r c Z C7 C-) 7J C-) -� m W < m O N r. m m O n OD -1 Z 00 --1 f7 OD - 1 D Or- D � m m z O o r > r C m > O ° o C:c<p Q� w =O i =1 T < � -i � O n m m 0 f �6 i m m m m 0 i I m m O � v m m O =a * O O O T Z Z z z z Q z n z L\Tl [ z O O CD 0 T �J o T 0 T O O T o T A D D D D n ;c D O y C 0 O" Z O r m F = 1 . m F m r= m m r m J _ C w O �( m cn w 0 J a�3mw �•C w z z 0 v z z W _-- C < z (<D cn 0) _ 0 m ? po D O A C7 < C7 0 O. CD z J > m D w OOwtna D v c. cD a7a� + r m J Z aoo�ayi JJJ _ J' ..'o w'ap m ZIN W MJ :IEI❑ 71 O m cc z o� D - 7�0 %O > Z m O T m m CD 'D (D 0,< O > (n D 2 '� D m _ Z m O Z m 7 o f Z 1 — 1 ,� m D m L7 m D Q O m 0'o 0 i 1 O 0 U) m m O m z O I w n- O c 1 m " :z W < m O N O n 003:W3 m m < c0 O cD N cD � fD r Z -{ O -{ Z D � D I -i Z z O o > r C m > O CD 'D (D 0,< >lB r j o f Z '" C: D L7 Q n O w 7 0 CL O_w m O m I m D O W < m O N O n 003:W3 m r m o C v ° o C:c to m _ C w O N cn w 0 d T = a�3mw �•C w 0 z C v W _-- C < (<D cn 0) _ m ? D A C7 < C7 0 O. CD z > m D w OOwtna D c. cD a7a� + r m Z aoo�ayi J' ..'o w'ap m VALUATION z cD CD w- w Z z_ O C r- m m r- - r- m Q Z w 1 D O (D Z z l O D m -1 m Z n m n x C K m n+ D z Q x m -0 r m m M C _ x� a0 0 O m C * 7 7 D W t:n r- x � D z m z c7 m n D C W r O A C) 7 7 0 0 -.. m 3 = O I C 2 m - O z n ODm (� r L7 m z A -n N ( T A31 0 y 7 z >r OmDrO u_' m 0(D i o�*z � of m cc.�= m 0 I cn m m� w 210 7 °x �a�ac O N cD I r. 0 o� or a � w I �• -no w a� y _Z4cmn m D E 2L o 0 0) %�3 �. m 0-n' °: I QI T O O cD -.0 Q 1 ml O ?mcncn7 --4 D v, w n x m aa0. 1 O N N CD �. I I Emma RECD JUL 5 1994 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 office of community development TO: ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL FROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MARCH 16, 1988 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE In summary, Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or material, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public place or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on all Town of Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft. off pavement. This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail Public Works Department. Persons found violating this ordinance will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material. In the event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the 24 hour time specified, the Public Works Department will remove said material at the expense of person notified. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be applicable to construction, maintenance or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities in the right -a -way. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town of Vail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Read and acknowledged by: e . j�j �L , �§q � - 7g' osition/Relationship to Project (i.e. contractor, owner) to lows 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 4797239 office of community developmeitt BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (.Public Works) review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as long as three weeks. All commercial (_large or small) and all multi -family permits will have to follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with. regard to necessary review, these projects may also take the three week period. Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible. I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. Agreed* to y-. Project Name /99 ate Work Sheet Uas turned into the V Community Development Department. TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING DEPARTMENT 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLORADO 81657 This letter authorizes COLORADO COMFORT PRODUCTS/ROD HALL CO. to install a gas service to feed each of the fireplaces at MOUNTAIN HAUS. We intend to convert these woodburning fireplaces to gas logs or gas inserts as homeowners desire them. AuCh6rized signature 09/02/94 09:40 $ 303 777 1169 COLORADO COMFORT P.01 C LORADOPOMFO RODUCTS CAS LOGS A GRILLS A STOVES ♦ FIREPLACES September 2, 19P4 Chuck Feldman Vail Building D partment 75 South Frontage Road Vail CO 81657 Dear Chuck, I have enclosed a drawing of our gas line runs for Mountain House. I have received the final tally of equipment that will be installed. Th re will be 71 - Peterson gas logs, 2 - Mendota in- serts, 2 - Osb rn inserts, and 1 - Emberfire insert. The total gas load is 4,953 cfh. We will run a 2 --pound trunk line through the lower level anc exit the building at the 1st floor chimney. A reg- ulator there w-11 drop the pressure to 6" water column and a 3/4" line will carr, the volume up through the decks. The trunk line at the back of th building will be exposed. I'm enclo ing a copy of the unit numbers and the gas product going in. Please ca 1 me if you have any questions. Sincerely, David G. Hall SEP 2 Enclosures TOV V. ' I Ll i. WYANDOT ♦ DEINER ♦ COLORAT)O ♦ 80223 A FAX l Q i n, o °;Rei + - �i. ..+�1 �etee d j Z ..'s �Je...• '�� p -1169 ♦ OFFICE: (303) 777-3234 05/02/94 09:41 303 777 1169 COLORADO COMFORT P.e2 K,-/* ,� W— U Town of V, w -W. 4- -P,) 9 0 1 /2-'Y-, 09/02/94 09:41 g 303 777 1169 COLORADO COMFORT P.03 N N W w W W tJ N N tJ tJ tJ iJ t3 %=► E.+ __► w w ►" o 9 CD 1..► r...► W N O C\ 01 pm, W +--+ O 00 J a\ (A N aaaa n r) nnna rri CZ— 1 1 1 t 1 , 1.l�cz� kw � V' til til til th th to .91, .A � W �• •p F++ :O 00 O\ .p O V (!� ►-+ OD O\ .h. N O �+ �D �1 G\ ih .ii � �wa�'��,:aaaa�'a�►a�yaayaa�a�a �� wO n 7J CIS,.a V-1 o �i 1 00 00 00 ' 00 00 v v J J 4 C\ G\ C\ G\ G1 10 J to W ►..► ti 0 -4 ON N O .00 ch W F•+ W 1p v C� fA aaaaaa�a�aaa� nrnr)nn nnd0n 1 21-1 C Plan Review Based on the 1991 Uniform Codes NAME: MTN HAUS GAS LINE ADDRESS: 292 E. MEADOW DR VAIL, COLORADO OCCUPANCY: R-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1 -FR DATE: 9-8-94 CONTRACTOR: ROD HALL ARCHITECT: NONE ENGINEER: NONE PLANS EXAMINER: DAN STANEK CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The items listed below are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the adopted codes. It is a guide to selected sections of the codes. The following is not to be construed to be an approval of any violation of any of the provisions of the adopted codes or any ordinance of the Town of Vail. 1. COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED PER SEC. 607 OF THE 1991 UMC. 2. INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS AND TO APPENDIX CHAPTER 21 OF THE 1991 UMC. 3. GAS LINE TEST AND INSPECTION IS REQUIRED BEFORE CONNECTION OF ANY EQUIPMENT PER SEC. 1206 OF THE 1991 UMC. 4. GAS APPLIANCES SHALL BE VENTED ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 9 OF THE 1991 UMC AND SHALL TERMINATE AS SPECIFIED IN SEC. 906 OF THE 1991 UMC. 5. FIELD INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE PER SEC. 305 OF THE 1991 UMC. 6. WHEN NEW ELECTRICAL LINES ARE REQUIRED WORK MUST BE DONE BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN. Town of Vail PERMIT NUMBER 9F PROJECT DATE JOB NAME CALLER ' READY FOR INSPECTION:: MON TUESW-ED LOCATION.- BUILDING: OCATION: BUILDING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ FOUNDATION / STEEL ❑ FRAMING ROOF & SHEER ❑ PLYWOOD NAILING — ❑ INSULATION ❑ SHEETROCK NAIL ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: ❑ TEMP. POWER ❑ ROUGH ❑ CONDUIT ❑ FINAL INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL 479-2138 THUR FRI PLUMBING: - ❑ UNDERGROUND ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. ❑ ROUGH / WATER J GAS PIPING ❑ POOL/ H. TUB i ❑ FINAL MECHANICAL: ❑ HEATING ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ FINAL AM PM APPROVED ElDISAPPROVED ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: j Ilf'C�c DATE /o/Z 1 2 19 '/ INSPECTOR A Professional Corporation 16 'RECI R 2 1 1991 East Meadow Drive Crossroads at Vail Crossroads MORTERARCHITECTS Vail, Colorado 81657 303/476-5105 FAX 303/476-0710 April 19, 1994 Mr. George Ruether Town of Vail Community Development Department 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Co 81657 RE: Robertson Remodel Mountain Haus Hello George, Yesterday, you asked me for a drawing illustrating the windows on floors 1 through 5, below the proposed window modifications at the Robertson unit at level 6 of Mountain Haus. We've been unable to locate such a drawing, so we took the enclosed photograph which shows the Robertson unit and the windows at the units on the fifth and fourth floors. As you may know, the windows at levels 1 through 5 are all in the same wall plane, are in the same slump block wall material; and align with each other vertically. All of the windows at level 6 are in a different wall plane, in a different material (wood siding), and currently have NO relationship to the windows at levels 1 through 5. The level 6 windows do not align with the windows below them, are not the same size as the windows below them, and serve totally different functions. Indeed, the window at levels 1 through 5 in the photograph are bedroom windows - the Robertson window above them is a living room window. You mentioned someone's idea of arbitrarily aligning some portion of the Robertson 's new living room window with the bedroom windows below. I would point out the following: MORTERARCHITECTS Ruether, Page 2 1. The Robertsons' new living room windows will wrap all the way around the corner, and have NO relationship to the smaller punched bedroom windows in the masonry wall below. 2. It is the INTENTIONAL nature of the existing building that the windows at levels 1 through 5 are aligned with each other and that level 6 is cantilevered in all four directions, and has no relationship in plan, consequently no relationship in window layout, with levels 1 through 5. 3. Because the wall at levels 1 through 5 is in a different plane than the wall at level 6, it would be physically impossible for anyone to know if anything in the two walls lined up. 4. The proposed window arrangement at the Robertson unit is a direct result of the internal elements, as are all the window at the sixth floor. The sixth floor is INTENTIONALLY designed to appear as the "penthouse" floor. To arbitrarily try to create a relationship that doesn't exist would violate that which already exists, and would be wrong. I would therefore ask you to approve the request of the Robertsons, the desire of the Mountain Haus Board of Directors, and do the right thing architecturally, Thank you for your assistance. cc: Ron Robertson Sandy Gray, General Rollie Kjesbo Enclosure Best reg$frds, Morter, FAIA ARCHITECTS Manager of the Mountain Haus =j Category Number Project Name: A Building Name: _ Project Description: Owner, Address and Phone: Design Review Action Foe TOWN OF VAIL Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot _ Project Street Address: Comments: Block Subdivision Date r Board /Staff Action Motion by: I`,' Vote: Seconded by: 12 //'' Approval Disapproval Staff App/l Conditions: i Y. AA - 3 Gi Zone District _ NJ S� Town Planner Date: f R`� DRB Fee Pre -paid' �yt I �{ - as J 1 �4711-udf'��"CP ��/� /��'/tiles � — �41 414<77 c" (-tV' �)- x.-) ew Lo(aby L.mc� L�oF- i.� 6C.�g 01 c Application Dat, 9/1" PEC MEETING DATE 10/11/93��SFP t 3, APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE I. This procedure is required for any project requesting a variance. The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted. A. NAME OF APPLICANT Mountain Haus Condominium Assoc. ADDRESS 292 E. Meadow Dr. Vail, CO 81657 PHONE 476-2434 B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Morter Architects ADDRESS 143 E. Meadow Dr., Suite 330 Vail, CO 81657 PHONE 476-5105 C. NAME OF OWNER(S) (type or print) Representative: Sandy Gray, General Manager Signature(s ADDRESS 292 E. Meadow Dr. Vail, CO 81657 D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL PHONE 476-2434 ADDRESS 292 E. Meadow Dr., Vail, CO 81657 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT BLOCK FILING VV 1st (Part of Tract B - Vail Village First Filin E. FEE $100 PAID 0 CK # � (� FROM CIc THE FEE MUST BE PA D BEFQW THE COMMU IT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. �,�',<�(} ��(• C, j��t3 . F. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and their mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES. II. A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED TO.'•DETERMINEIF ANY'ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT A CO.1JFLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAi iLINE TIE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING ` AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. ; III. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: 1. The relationship of the requested vatiance t6'other ex'istih4,b'i,�-P0,tent14r. uses and structures in the vicinity., 2. The degree to which relief from the,,striet or literal inte'� enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve C*04 0.1111 and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attaiifv: objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. f=. OVER _,ice - 3. The effect'of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. B. A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least l" - 20' stamped by a Colorado licensed surveyor including locations of all existing improve- ments, including grades and elevations. Other elements which must be shown are parking and loading areas, ingress and egress, landscpped areas and utility and drainage features. C. A site plan at a scale of at least 1" = 20' showing existing and proposed buildings. D. All preliminary building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed on the site. E. A preliminary title report to verify ownership and easements F. If the proposal is located in a multi -family development which has a homeoti,„ers' association, then written approval from the association in support of the project must be received by a duly authorized agent for said association. G. Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as determined by the zoning administrator., * For interior modifications, an improvement survey and site plan may be waived by the zoning administrator. IV. Time Requirments The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A complete application form and all accompanying material (as described above) must be submitted a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearing. No incomplete applications (as determined by the zoning administrator) will be accepted by the planning staff before or after the desig- nated submittal date. �4 T P * *U3 K*,, C-� ffJ\JTS DEBORAH SWAIN, GEN MGR VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB 352 E. MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO 81657 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE RD. WEST VAIL, CO 81657 JOHANNES FAESSLER HOTEL SONNENALP 20 VAIL ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 oil '�I'v MANAGER THE GALLERY BUILDING 228 BRIDGE STREET VAIL, CO 81657 THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on October 11, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at 580 S. Frontage Road East/an unplatted parcel located between Vail Village 7th Filing and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the 1-70 right-of-way. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center Planner: Andy Knudtsen 2. A request for a height variance to allow for dormers to be constructed at the Mountain Haus located at 262 East Meadow Drive/part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association Planner: Shelly Mello 3. A request for a fence height variance to allow for a fence to be constructed around a swimming pool at the May Residence located at 1119 Ptarmigan Road/Lot 6, and the east 1/2 of Lot 5, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Paula May Planner: Shelly Mello 4. A request for an amendment to SDD #4, Area D, to allow an expansion to the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road West/Lot 45, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Planner: Shelly Mello 5. A request for a major exterior alteration in CCI, for an addition to the Cyranos Building, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Margretta B. Parks Planners: Mike Mollica 6. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of three Type IV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows: A part of Tract "B" and a part of Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: *4 �.. 'taw Commencing at the Northeast corner of Vail Village, First Filing; thence North 79046'00" West along the Southerly line of U.S. Highway No. 6 a distance of 367.06 feet to the Northeast corner of said Tract "B"; thence South 10014'00" West along the Easterly line of said Tract "B"; a distance of 198.31 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Tract "B"; thence North 79°46'00" West along the Southerly line of said Tract "B" a distance of 100.00 feet to the true point of beginning thence North 09010'07" West a distance of 41.67 feet; thence South 88°27'11" West a distance of 75.21 feet; thence South 27013'37" East a distance of 77.37 feet; thence North 57024'00" East a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less to the true point of beginning. Applicant: David Smith Planner: Jim Curnutte 7. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte 8. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing/325 Forest Road. Applicant: Timothy Drisko Planner: Andy Knudtsen 9. A request for approval of the Cemetery Master Plan and Report, for the Town of Vail Cemetery to be constructed in the upper bench of Donovan Park. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Andy Knudtsen 10. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Planner: Mike Mollica Bill Pierce stated that there is no state law concerning the requirements for fences around swimming pools. Dalton Williams made a motion to approve this request for a fence height variance per the PEC's discussion and the sketch that Shelly Mello presented to the PEC. He added the condition that the fence be constructed of a more transparent material (i.e. thin metal railing versus the wood fence). Jeff Bowen seconded this motion. Dalton Williams added that the criteria which he was basing his motion for approval on was for public safety reasons. A 7-0 vote approved this request. 3. A request for a height variance to allow for dormers to be constructed at the Mountain Haus located at 262 East Meadow Drive/part of Tract B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association Planner: Shelly Mello Shelly Mello made a presentation per the staff memo and stated that this request was similar to the request made by the Mountain Haus in 1989. She stated that staff was recommending denial of this request. She stated that the dormers did not have huge impacts with regard to design, but that there was not a physical hardship to justify the addition of dormers. Tom Cole, of Morter Architects, stated that this request arose out of the contemplated 1994 reroof project for the Mountain Haus and concerns that what currently exists at the Mountain Haus is not in conformance with the 1991 Uniform Building Code. He stated that the proposed dormers would not add any additional height to the building nor would the dormers impact any adjacent property owners views. He stated that they were attempting to improve the existing situation via this request in the hopes of adding additional light. Dalton Williams stated that he cannot find any grounds for hardship to grant a variance. Allison Lassoe, Jeff Bowen, Greg Amsden, Diana Donovan and Bill Anderson stated that they had nothing further to add. Kathy Langenwalter suggested that the applicant flatten the roof slope to accommodate the reroof. She explained that the Vail Athletic Club went through a lengthy Special Development District process and that they went through an extensive give and take process. Jeff Bowen made a motion to deny the applicant's request for a height variance in order to add dormers to the upper floor of the Mountain Haus based on the finding that there is no physical hardship as outlined in the staff memo. Diana Donovan seconded this motion and a 7-0 vote denied this request. Planning and Environmental Commission October 11, 1993 10 t v MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: October 11, 1993 SUBJECT: A request for a height variance in order to add dormers to the upper floor of the Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association Planner: Shelly Mello ....... .,............, ......,........... .,v: .......,v; •. v:: ••. ..\.,v:; ••, ,•+:::::-.....:;.�v,v+•�r:w:i:?v:?v:+i(C�:�4; v. vvb:::•: n4.,•:. „Y\v?::•+:.\..,,v.v?; :\{ ji;+jt:i?;;.:{•:n\ \.?+�. a: v;.,••:;•:\�� \ti:�\i.,,:;;:;o-:;:?:;,: a;.;.,? $tiff;:•?:Ay;:.�..•:`.a••k\ati �..Ro.. `+.,, •:�:;,,,x;•::;, •.,• . _ •;;:; .. _ ..: _ _ . .... ... _ _ .. .. 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED The Mountain Haus Condominium Association is requesting a height variance in order to add dormers across the south elevation of the building. The dormers would be added to the seventh floor roof area and would replace existing 18 inch awning windows. The intent of the dormer additions is to increase the amount of light and ventilation which presently enters the south -facing bedrooms and to allow for the addition of a new insulated roof. The applicant states: "The Mountain Haus considers the existing window/roof configuration to be a hardship for the following reasons: Inadequate light, ventilation, and view provided from the sixth floor loft bedrooms. 2. The inability to achieve necessary window flashing and proper roof insulation for the proposed 1994 re -roofing project." The dormers would not add any GRFA to the building. The Mountain Haus is in the Public Accommodation zone district which has a maximum height restriction of 48 feet. The existing ridge height of the building is 74 feet. Because the Mountain Haus was constructed prior to the adoption of the Town's Zoning Code, the building is considered a pre-existing, non -conforming use. Although the proposed dormers would not exceed the ridge line of the existing building, a variance is required because the dormers would exceed the 48 foot height requirement of the PA zone district. The height of the proposed dormers would be 72 feet above existing grade (2 feet below the existing roof ridge). II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Department of Community Development recommends denial of the requested variance based upon the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The overall height of the Mountain Haus is significantly greater than other adjacent buildings. The Vail Village Master Plan's conceptual building height plan has identified the surrounding properties and their potential heights as follows: Vail Athletic Club" Sonnenalp (Austria Haus) Covered Bridge Building Gallery Building (Russell's) Slifer Building Vail Row Houses Height (stories)* 6... = 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 3-4 A story is defined as 9 feet of height, no roof included. '* Please note the Vail Village Master Plan Building Height Profile designates this building as being four stories along Gore Creek. **' Denotes existing or approved buildings which do not conform to the conceptual building height plan. Considering the heights of the existing, adjacent buildings and the recommendation of the Village Master Plan, the staff believes that any height increase for the Mountain Haus would only create a greater disparity of height between the Mountain Haus and neighboring buildings. We do acknowledge that the increase in height for the dormers would have a minimal impact on the surrounding neighborhood and design character of the area. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privileges. The staff has been unable to identify a physical hardship and subsequently has been unable to support the height variance for the Mountain Haus. We find that the building code issues identified by the applicant can be addressed without adding the dormers upon consultation with the Town's Chief Building Official. These windows do not provide egress. We believe that the granting of this variance would be a grant of special privilege, as adjacent buildings are significantly lower in height. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The staff is of the opinion that the proposed dormer additions would have little, if any, impact on any of the above named considerations. III. APPLICABLE POLICIES FROM VAIL'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Vail Village Master Plan has identified the Mountain Haus property as a site which may be considered for a maximum building height of six stories. No specific sub -area concepts of the Village Plan apply to this parcel. The Urban Design Guide Plan for the Vail Village does not include this property. IV. FINDINGS The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone district. 3 IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommendation is for denial of the requested height variance. We believe that approval of this request would be a grant of special privilege and that the variance would not be in compliance with the approved Vail Village Master Plan or variance criteria. The staff also believes that a physical hardship does not exist and therefore the request should not be approved. We find that the applicant's issues can be addressed in other ways such as the addition of skylights which would not require a height variance. cApec\memos\mtnhaus.oct 1XM �� A-J�e ",,- Z, 1A A f�Ak M AA9411 YUA 0 l%W i■. •.rri I It . 1.1 _ iff y. -Ni 1► THE MOUNTAIN HAUS VAIL, COLORADO the' mj Mueller co., inc. p.o. box 2747 476-2627 vaiL colorado 81658• Ir I I O2rG� �0 oNLL-si 4 F ��I----I��l�u I Y,k (ale 4 F ��I----I��l�u I 411W '6W ~e MORTERARCHITECTS ?4rsl Dffilft 0 Letter of Transmittal Date: To: /7— Project: Project: Please find enclosed the following: �A}Tofessional Corporation 143 East Meadow Drive Crossroads at Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 303/476-5105 303/476-0710 Fax Dated Copies Of it liGf>�i -17 Remarks: �i�OIJ/dP Q��rb7l/y7ti�L�t� 17.6 �j�sfr�� 7f,L O By: �'ylL HAWNINGS -CLAD and WOOD SHADING OPTIONS Slimshade® Blinds HARDWARE OPTIONS Parameters • Slimshade Blinds and Pleated Shades are to be used in conjunction with the double glazing panel system. Check double glazing panel parameters when specifying Slimshade Blinds and Pleated Shades. • Maximum width is 60". • Not available for units glazed with plastic sheet glazing. • If used with 3/16" tempered prime glazing, Slimshade and Pella®Pleated Shades Pleated Shade operation may be restricted. • Not available for units with 1/4" exterior glazing • Verify glass thickness required for specified design pressure to assure compatibility with shading option selected. Standard Hardware includes: • aluminum pivot arm • steel operating hardware and locks Corrosion Resistant Package includes: • stainless steel pivot arm • copper and nickel alloy operating hardware and locks Windload Hardware: • stainless steel pivot arm • sector arm is welded to the sector gear assembly GLASS AREA, VENT AREA, AND LINEAL FEET OF SASH CRACK �io�ooSt� Biu.-aC/ �5 �✓RS s •cbo✓L �, �o ,ssv�-zea s Unit Number Glass area ft' Vent area ft= Lin. ft. of crack Unit Number Glass area ft= Vent area ft ' Lin. ft. of crack Unit Number Glass area ft' 3012 3016 3018 3020 3024 2.3 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.8 2.3 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.8 7.8 8.5 8.8 9.2 9.8 4812 4816 4818 4820 4824 3.7 5.1 5.7 6.4 7.7 3.6 5.0 5.6 6.3 7.6 10.8 11.5 10.8 12.2 12.8 3660 3668 14.6 16.6 4236 4242 4248 4254 4260 4268 10.2 11.9 13.6 15.3 17.1 19.4 3612 3616 3618 3620 3624 2_8 3.8 4.3 2_7 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.8 8.8 9.5 8.8 10.2 10.8 3036 3042 3048 3054 3060 3068 7.2 8.4 9.7 10.9 12.1 13.7 4.8 5.7 4836 4842 4848 4854 4860 4868 11.6 13.6 15.6 17.6 19.5 22.2 4212 4216 4218 4220 4224 3.3 4.4 5.0 5.6 6.7 3.2 4.3 4.9 5.5 6.7 9.8 10.5 10.8 11.2 11.8 3636 3642 3648 3654 8.7 10.2 11.6 13.1 - - To convert glass or vent areas to square meters (m'), multiply square feet by 0.0929. A Professional Corporation 143 East Meadow Drive Crossroads at Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 303/476-5105 FAX 303/476-0710 MORTER'\RCH ITECTS TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Morter Architects/Mountain Haus Condominium Assoc. DATE: September 13, 1993 RE: A request for a height variance in order to add dormers to the upper floor of the Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Drive. (Part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing) I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED The Mountain Haus Condominium Association is requesting a height variance in order to add dormers across the south elevation of the building. The dormers would be added to the 6th floor loft area and would replace existing 18" high windows. Current windows do not meet U.B.C. standards regarding light and ventilation. In addition, current window configurations and sill heights will not accommodate new roof insulation and venting required for a 1994 re -roofing project. The intent of the dormer additions is to increase the amount of light and ventilation which presently enters the south - facing bedrooms, and provide the ability to adequately accomplish a spring 1994 re -roofing project. The dormers would not add any GRFA to the building. The Mountain Haus is in the Public Accommodation zone district which has a maximum height restriction of 48 feet. The existing ridge height of the building is 74 feet. Because the Mountain Haus was constructed prior to the adoption of the Town's zoning code, the building is considered a pre-existing, non -conforming use. Although the proposed dormers would not exceed the ridge line of the existing building, a variance is required because the dormers would exceed the 48 foot height requirement of the PA zone district. The height of the proposed dormers would be 72 feet above existing grade (2 feet below the existing roof ridge). The Mountain Haus considers the proposed dormers not only an aesthetic improvement to the roof, but a necessary component of a properly addressed 1994 re -roofing project. II. MORTER ARCHITECTS Mountain Haus Variance, Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS: A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The overall height of the Mountain Haus is greater than other adjacent buildings. The Vail Village Master Plan's conceptual building height plan has identified the surrounding properties and their potential heights as follows: Height (stories)* Vail Athletic Club = 6 Sonnenalp = 3-4 Covered Bridge Building = 3-4 Gallery Building (Russells') = 3-4 Slifer Building = 3-4 Vail Row Houses = 3-4 *(a story is defined as 9 feet of height, no roof included) Considering the fact that the new dormer roofs will be lower than the existing ridge line of the Mountain Haus and according to the U.B.C. and Town of Vail Zoning Code's definition of height, the Mountain Haus would not be adding height (as suggested by the requirement of a variance). In addition, the new dormers may create a scale more appropriate and closer to that of surrounding buildings. B. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. MORTER ARCHITECTS Mountain Haus Variance, Page 3 The Mountain Haus considers the existing window/roof configuration to be a hardship for the following reasons: 1. Inadequate light, ventilation, and views provided �.A from the 6th floor loft bedrooms. 2. The inability to achieve necessary window flashing and proper roof insulation for the proposed 1994 re -roofing project. C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population transportation and traffic facilities public facilities and utilities and public safety. The proposed dormer additions would have no impact on any of the above named considerations. * *0 MORTERARCHITECTS ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS THE MOUNTAIN HAUS AT VAIL 1. The Vail Athletic Club 352 E. Meadow Dr. Vail, CO 81657 2. The Hotel Sonnenalp 20 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 3. Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 4. The Gallery Building 228 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAio L TO 01,TN OF VATT. A& dik- i^�l'l.'::�\:y vj.a :.r 4. ,( ! •,: r{i`}.tins;- :_v\.•.vi'v:.:: "i'. )'•i'v'w. ri:,.. S'. •::Srti:•>:•K}•\::.i •.�iir:.:��:V.�:N%� :iq. t }. :w:Jw r r.n":aSi•:: +. W. .,.nJ, ,�.:. Oi:Yr;^ r/.:t ::•.`{;}�}.. j._, r.^.: }:v.vnS::ti i� > > ..}: '`.::i}.:...v:. {Yjyyi J�a- .yi:]f -<..: �t r'. TOWN OF VAIL <' DEPART,\•1E; iT OF COIYINIU, IITY DEVELOPMENT ' SALES ACTION FOR. 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD .Vf4, COLO 0 81657 �! / �j Nri. !E L ••4,.� DATE '"< ,.•J ... �:. :.,.}, ,• .....:.....:.: .t:,s.,.r.r,, i:as: :'.i..;+::;: }r;w}ti\:.c•'::.. `.. ., � :i. \::rri !:•x:�:. .<.., :i3'S^. ,.�:C.^.5:. iso`:%:er .•:<:........ rtS't .... ... ....,.5. ....... .\... .... ,.. ..r ... ✓':,,. .:+.tq :.. i.4,+:;ir'•^.::..: ..... ort•: :•'j}• ':'?':^Sk-• ,,.w:i� .r5, ..,. `.: ., ::<:• ., r S?a • FA.;: TOT;1U>;�. :;•ACCOL�IT::\O:r•:<;•;;.:r:}>.:..:.;a.:::;•:::<:<;.;>.�.>�:,-i:�..: .xo: a;>;.�:;;:.;;; .:.:ITE1•f;'<>�° r.�:tY :.t'?��:a.:�0>t.,.;;:•::.,GOST .;�. J O1 d0�?041s4o I ZO\-NC; A,\'D ADDRESS bfAPS I Ss.00 `} 41004042415 IWT"OR_\SBL7LDLNG CODE y 010000 4,2415 I UNIFOR\i PLU,? NG CODE I 35.00I 01 0440 4,2•:15 I UMFOR\'f \1ECHA-N'ICAL CODE I 532.00 z> 01 00,.'0 4,2415 I UNIFORAf FIRE CODE I 536.60 01 6400 424 15 I NATIONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE I I 530.00 01 0400 42415 I OTHER CODE 500X5 I I O1 C'�00ti1S43 I BLUE• PRPgTS (.\IYLABS) I I 57.001 };. >. ::. 01 060) 4,2412 I ?:%BOX COPS S / STUDIES I I 50.26 I >, >{' 01 0000 2371 I Pr-',4A1.TY FL•ESIRE•ENSPECT',ONS 01 O '041332 j PL,VN REVIEW RECHECK FEE f 540 PER NR.) 01 006042322 I OFF YOURS D4SPECTION FEES I I 01 000041412 I CONI?—%CTORS L)CE.\'SES FL•1:S 01 0000 41330 I FEES ^` .01 0000 41413 _OT}iER I SIGN APPL'.CATJON FEE I I s -,o.00 I 01 COW 41413 IADDITIONAI: SIGNAGE FLE )51.00 "ER SQ.1T.) I %' '•'' :a 01040042"0 h,7CARTPROJr.CTDONATJON I :i 014L''004)331 IPREPr'JDDESIGNREVIEWBOARDFxE I 01004042412 I BUILDING—CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI KS5.00h' * 01 0000 21112 TAX 0%):< *• O1 0000 41010 TAX (4X) 01 0000 42371 INVESTIGATION FEE (BUILDING) TOTAL DUE: .. . ;r....r 2r . .. .......... .:. ... .•:•., ,v..r rw..Jr ...... . .. .::...,,.:.:,.:.,:�;::Sn:S[';1?:�.::v:}::.;n.:..}tv::1?:.?v':v`•'v �.h i�.T:::: a:'.}:. . :f�. ;\ .w.:. .., •.. a-r.:.v.:....{.,,}..{.::.r....iv'.::: •. v.ry �i, i:{.. �..... r.l- ... �:}7.: r.:.. ,...; < J:. Y�1I .,, < .. .r . r,,: :. ^.::. :,.. ..v, r..... ...... .v. .... , ... v:a.i :'4 r: `::: - .... :},•Jv:i: •:� i::{ vi: w?~�: .a .. ,..... •.......:,.•.:•:•...r.rw .n...4,.: >:�»:•e::.;,{.::.{s•;j {:. .�.i.. .:> <t: .R > .a .a� 01 0100 4 1 330 `1ALGRFA 250- I A D Di T7 0, 5200.001 _.^ :.- O1 0004 -11330 i CONDI"TION:,L USE PER\nT I I 520.001 _ ' • 01 000 41330 1 EkiERJOR ALTERATION LESS THAN 100 S .F1'. I 5200.601 0100004,1330 1EXTERJORAL-FrRAT.ON I\;ORETrlAYIWSQ.Fr. ) ) 0100004)330 1SPECIALDEVELOP\-!,!DISTRICT NEN �1,1* S0100404)330 SPECIALDEVELOPtifENTDISTRJCT 14AJOR ANL\'7i S 0 O D C7 O 0 z m � D D n Z O D r C7 OZ D C) - O C7 `► z r n D H o � O D r n Z 0 � m D m 0 x O D D C7 = n -� O z m x N AZ FD 0 'LJ"'r C/) G) c1 D r m r -� -� T H r O m -I O { D D (rn Z ,rn m Z m Z m { - m G Z 0 O O O Z z OD D C D z D D < m F-' m H. O r r W N - (n (n G G m O m O m O m - m O N w w L7 O G N• Z O Z O Z O Z O N .z O tai x r (DD n G In. (D (T O (D O I I E m p C O in ■ . l Kmco mmC C) m r = H O D X Z � D 0 ND r v m O m X --I O W m T M 0 O C C1 O v r m m r { U _W O O (n c D Z 0 m O T T m O -1 nm > D 0 m O< O x � Z m H G7 v p x Cn 0 O D m m Om O C L7 m H { F� r m O lT1 m w (a O z C r 2 m G G m { a<g� � Z � _ amm n 'Z m Cn (D 3 (c O G) O r Z rt D C m CD -0 Cp Z r z O r W O N cD CS D U) CT C D O A� D T rb d 7 0 Z z ..-i Z 0 a p a W m O r- c m fo F n < Z d< cr o p v (D � o p C) CDJ F~-] C a C (D m m x (D G O O O 0- z a n T z z �H� (00 in O D 2D D(n CD Cn(D c -0� _ (Z O D In T --I D rt rt N W _ cn r (D 0 O. 7 -� Z Dn A < C7 o :3 C1 CDz ([' rt X < W 1 D (n m D 0- 0 W (n 0. D T D W a l w r C D O G W Q (D Er m m z r'r Cc �_ sv N CO VA UATION z (CD N= n' O F. rt Z z It7 -I C 0 0 O v m v co O Z a) rj GQ W Z H. 0 p) (n r m m m r r r C 2 '�0 O O �. O G" rt rt O D I z D � z c) m = I z O_ m m c_ mC� C) >> Cn o p DI n0� X C z D z m = z O C7 r �m p�(„3-= Q. i -nc z nT' m o<° n 0 v z m z r x m z n ° M (D ON `�<- w Q w n I7 � r- CnI rt O �_ Om m D O D D Po O N? �' p W C Z y rt r -� Cn Dp m O 7 �. 7 .C+ rt ) -i I (D m O Z "` (O G 'c3 ]" Z O m D m Er - - H. (D (D I m 'v D ~w w° � n m o0 (n 0 m O D < (rQ � rD m I m x Ha a— ~'cn n O C CL rt W I 3 K ° a sZi z_ wajN CD w N. DC m Ul Z o<p�� m p r� �) o 0 m ��v_,.a�o �rcn w I o0o a v) o O 0v-.3 m a (D I o 00 0 C:) 0 W 'Q 0 7 CD fD I o 0 0 T CD O ClCL CDO F G (n -0 0 0 0 CD to 7 Cn W I N m� = N m I :00 (D G (-i C { p CD OL a .0 (D N (D l0 W c cO( w CCD m �. a 0' I W .m am -n (0 CD - a n w m ' p� Z7 7, C 0) IJyrt m 93 -0 /u im Z H O M --i m � I w n o O N � 00 O m M "om W H H O a) m x m H O Z C- 0 O co --1 m n O D m O n Om ? 0 D D On M rD n O� ?C D� O� ;0M L� ?m D-4 OD r O �� > �m�, (7 D m m Or`�1' zt O z Z O m m O m G7 C7 T O ° �d oo3v67�- p T m M Z CL E-.,< A g H Cad c a M m m Omm 'D�? Q • O N a)C O D Z i m fm Z CLc z Dy?< y (D m (p O > 1 m f 00 7 CLCD Oa 0 m y a m f -i { O 3 { d3aMMr Ofp-0 y aO y w C' c z 6 ' o o � v z 0 z O� (D �• 0 D TC O CCD 1 -.0 a:E > z 0 A > z 0 *m mv3O-. z o, O -o 3 Z mT A N 5 O G a 0 00 �. 7• C Z T �) M D T 0 :,,q CL > S T T z O a• 7 m M 6 D <. O 1 y a y Or D m�w3 D Q A O (D y ro D cD O D y y 7 A D (O �- y M y w (D a r W M z © ZT m ;zE >° M 6z �.M --q VALUATI rrn O ca M O M r m Q r- � c b M C m O 2 ca z O O Z = O Z A z G7 0 Z Co C- 0 (j O U) M M m N m M O M v c W E V) R� r mM D r 4) A — p 7c y A <D fa OZ C (D N CD 3 (D O D = -4 O M m m O O O D T CLm o a0 O I2 m 0 z D r ° �d oo3v67�- i m T C m�-vo H M Z CL E-.,< A g H Cad c a A M 1-3 Oc??^'u CD .3 � 'D�? Q • O N a)C O D Z i C A 6"0 — CLc < Dy?< y (D O (p O > 1 O 00 7 CLCD Oa 0 m y a v i O 0 (Dav d3aMMr Ofp-0 y aO y w o< 6 ' o o � v z z O� (D �• un D TC O CCD 1 -.0 a:E > G A > z *m mv3O-. O O -o 3 Z mT A N 5 O G a 0 00 �. 7• C Z \ .� �� ) M D �.m�mov 0 :,,q CL > S a 0 y 00 CDD — C CLS z O a• 7 m M .. D <. O 1 y a y Or m�w3 O S Q A O (D y ro „ cD O O y y 7 A A CD m as°. O y (D C y M y w (D a W M z D = -4 O M m 2 stn O D T p O I2 m 0 z D r D Z A i m T f 0 M Z C7 A M D IO vO � Q D Z i 7■►+il� m M M � — N 0 AC M O m A r r- C O I2 m 0 z D r D Z A C r O G7 T M C7 A M vO � Q D Z i ,9:1a mM -i* M mC � r S O m Z Z • C) 0 r El El -n -0 I C C z � W i o z 69E Z m --4 0 w — N M O n M M C7 � m vO � Q D Z T n M n < O O O N v -4 O 0 A o< C � v z z un �D 0 m o z O z z I T > S (� _ .. D _ - O ro m _ A nqi v W M z © ZT ;zE >° M .o -1 �.M --q VALUATI N O ca M r r- � c m M C m 2 ca -4ca O = 0 A z G7 0 Z ' C- 0 co U) M M m m M O M W E t 10WO of VOFI�' 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 office of community development BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works) review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as long as three weeks. All commercial (large or small) and all multi -family permits will have to follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with regard to necessary review, these projects may also take the three week period. Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible. I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. Agreed to y. C2�x , ProjecY Name Date Work Sheet was turned into the Community Development Department. 10WHI of voi 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-21.38 or 479-2139 office of community development TO: ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL FROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MARCH 16, 1988 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE In summary, Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or material, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public place or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on all Town of Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft. off pavement. This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail Public Works Department. Persons found violating this ordinance will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material. In the event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the 24 hour time specified, the Public Works Department will remove said material at the expense of person notified. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be applicable to construction, maintenance or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities in the right -a -way. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town of Vail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Read and acknowledged by: G Position/R lationship to Project Da�`�T-� contractor, owner) SEM' BY:MOUNTAIN HAUS VAIL 1-28-93 ; 4:36PM MOUNTAIN HAUS VAIL-TOWN OF VAIL COM -DEV;# 2/ 3 Aa. �6e..Aaa�y'e� �rc%da'zr3 �x �riy'3 SENT.BY:MOUNTAIN HAUS VAIL 1-28-93 ; 4:37M ; MOUNTAIN HAUS VAIL-TOWN OF VAIL COM -DEV;# 3/ 3 w JAN 2 a 1993 Naw .w m J V � .t 3 ' � S Y L .Z;j C-V 0`,09 `I I r Ib — ti N k,f6; _ JA.3pr - �` 0V h 26W2 U~ h h 1 Z7 r� IS m o ,sr 6'► I Q 3 p �1 OY I.0 �1 "► � O .L h 'I h � tl {, Lp �-Fd 6 H In p R� h h J .9 N I o Q s l Q Q ZW °r c I b. w 3 ' —A O V X rr r9 n QY ! Y Q J 7 rrnn a o o Q a O O p O.itb ,y OH m Iilll'91 tl LL111- �O 09 - O ,O'1 \J p M a x "„ ILg . b LE (� b 7 IV -WO-70 r ,09 - - ,ZH K n 1� .►H 9Z Sl l I I r `r 3, 00, 8l. ZON I 4 h b T VAir_ A7i4r,Fnc (].ux 351 FAs7 MT A1.x1w Dn rvp VArr, COLORADO 51657 3031476-0700 FAx 303/476.64151 January 8, 1993 Mr. Jim Curnutte Town of Vail Planning and Environmental CO=ission 111 S. Frontage fid. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Jim; This letter confirms that the Vail Athletic Club understands the plans of the Mountain haus to construct a new awning on their east entrance and that the entrance awning and poles will extend 5 feet onto Vail Athletic Club property. We agree to this construction, subject to a legal agreement between the Mountain Haus and the Vail. Athletic club, detailing that this agreement is dependent on the ownership of the Vail Athletic Club building and/or future improvement plans. As president of American Hospitality, Inc., Z am acting as an agent for the owners of the Vail. Athletic Club. sincerely, Stan Cope �izd--.,.��■.� _ en -o DIi3-Nid 1IUA Sa:LT 66, 90 NUf i CONTRACTOR_._ __-- ORDKR NO. LOCATIc:'>N OF JOB--._ _DATE EXISTTUL QALL T.S. Vr li�Y_ iS4a. (TYPICAL A\J(UIM6 FRAME) HWH'TE K" SCREW *2 3/ a • 9a. MUL- QATED Z' MIf (TYPILAL) K (SPACED P 3'-4& MKIZA VERT.) v777-/77_:7 I 1 77 19 MdH 'TSIA" 3LREIJ *14 r 2" AL CTYPILAL ATTALNMEAIT TO WUL STIIl� WALL TYPILAL iu "T CLIP z 14WH'TS/A' SLREW 11M ill w!~RAWL' PLL16 " i2 r Ph! TYPILAL ATTALHMENT Tti MASUIRY i LONLRETE WALLS ,r RAWC PLLALjS: A SLATE FIBRE PLLJb WITK A MIM MUM PULL -AUT ST9EM6TH 8F 4i5 Ibb. TS/A' 4 "TE K SLKEIJS , # 14 . W'6 wITH, A MI klIMUM SNEAK STKEWTN &F 145. v:t ' w, 0,0 f 761/1 -7%_ IY V L, #4 lie Mft—job— !:L 11 1 Emmmoommoft n PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT DATE ''f �� -� JOB NAME INSPECTION REQUEST TOWN OF VAIL CALLER1��---- READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED �r THU FRI LOCATION: y/iI AM PM r _ _ BUILDING: PLUMBING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ UNDERGROUND ❑ FOUNDATION / STEEL ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. ❑ FRAMING ❑ ROUGH / WATER ❑ ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING ❑ GAS PIPING ❑ INSULATION ❑ POOL / H. TUB ❑ SHEETROCK NAIL ❑ FINAL,�� ` ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: ❑ TEMP. POWER ❑ HEATING ❑ ROUGH ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ CONDUIT ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ ❑ ❑ FINAL ❑ FINAL APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: DATE �� r3 INSPECTOR Pmrrrsxov IL Project Application E Date 1 Project Name: /I ICICVr-I / K1ic/ If 14v --Z" N--4a-"*xatCYJVnfP7r_vf0h S Project Description: N2ct� /Qg ONO h®�{ Wr)fri��irN�ic�c� Contact Person and Phone ��'e,'"h J �YV1 /`' (6.M •) Ll 7� `" l �/ a J(2 - E UIT C , Com. Owner, Address and Phone: CzS Cr 6Wc.�-�_ Architect, Address and Phone: I,"( I,"( c af) Legal Description: Lot Block Filing�� UC(rr( /LLGt��P Zone Comments: Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: &/zt APPROVAL Town Planner Date: 0;0.3; e -'-- Date DISAPPROVAL ,:z -7z' Iz- Staff Approval TOWN 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-21381479-2139 January 15, 1993 ,` Mountain Haus Condominium Association Attn. Preston Jump, General Manager 292 East Meadow Drive Vaii, Coiorado 8 i 657 • FILE COPY Department of Community Development Re: January 11, 1993, PEC action on request for setback variances to allow for the addition of a 9' awning over the north building entrance and a 10' awning over the east building entrance, 292 East Meadow Drive, a portion of Block 5, Vail Village First Filing. Dear Preston: Enclosed is a copy of the minutes of the January 11, 1993, Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) meeting at which your variance request was approved. The attached copy of the minutes will serve as your record of the conditions of approval. Please note that the approval of this conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion, or if the use for which the permit is granted has not commenced within two years from approval (January 11, 1995). If approval of this variance lapses, an application must be resubmitted for reconsideration by the Community Development Department staff and the PEC. If you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303/479-2138. Sincerely, /� L""W� Jim Curnutte Town Planner Enclosure E FILE Copy It was the general consensus that the Board agreed with the applicant and portions of the staff memo. Jeff Bowen motioned to approve the request per the applicant's request for additional garage space, roofline modification, and site coverage modifications with the condition that the secondary unit be restricted as employee housing, and landscaping be installed. Chuck Crist seconded the motion with a 5-1 vote. Dalton Williams opposed the request. 5. A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge to allow the construction of a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595 East Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 25,1993 Chuck Crist motioned to table the request with Gena Whitten seconding the motion. A unanimous vote of 6-0 tabled this request until January 25, 1993. 6. A request for setback variances to allow the construction of two awnings to be located at the Mountain Haus/292 E. Meadow Drive/a portion of Block 5, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Preston Jump representing the Mountain Haus Condo Association Planner: Jim Curnutte Jim Curnutte reviewed the staff memo with the Planning and Environmental Commission. Preston Jump pointed out the dangerous situation over the east side entrance due to ice on the steps. Chuck asked if the ash can on the east side of the building can be relocated. Preston said no but he plans on converting the building to gas in the Fall so it would be unnecesssary at that time. Chuck moved to approve the north side awning per staff memo, with the condition that its length be limited to 9 feet from the building and that the east side awning be limited to 10 feet from the building. Dalton Williams seconded the motion with a 6-0 unanimous vote to approve the request. 7. A request for a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village Area A, Millrace III to amend the approved development plan to allow for one single family residence and one duplex located at 1335 Westhaven Drive, more specifically described as follows: A part of the SW 1/4, NE 114, Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: Beginning at a point of the North-South centerline of said Section 12 whence an iron pin with a plastic cap marking the center of said Section 12 bears Planning and Environmental Commission January 11, 1993 nl�9 n , ®,� e -f4e 4) ' cam_ l-e.-- �'�:ce�� S�=f ca �e rmLV-2s� c lG� 'tom mac'Gds /) e h- 'Y( qye, c)li m olc� X-,t� lc� 16 Ty ��-� � 140��74K 'wX?i;-y to e GK„ l� `fly_cf CL qdrr�a+��ed APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT TO ERECT OR MAINTAIN A STRUCTURE ON A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 'THIS FORM CANNOT BE REDUCED (Please type or print) Fence Wall Landscaping � Other ��,��►/�/Y DATE .Irl >✓ , > , I`� 3 ( OWNER OF PROPERTY /V -/)l f ' L) y CoJ� IL)M NAME OF APPLICANT �i S'�r ✓ %r1/��('/�'��a� /s��r�/�F,£>� ADDRESS——) Cels, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED: t..� q LOT -- BLOCK SUBDIVISION �� ',zne,(-lf necessary, attach o description on separate sheet). Corner lot �� Inside lot 0 W DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OR ITEM(S) INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY: %i ✓% i�Iiv" -n'r7 C i� ✓i �V T �✓ / /L a CC% Attach plans showing encroachment, property line, sidewalks, curbs, intakes, h dr nts, meters, manholes, any other affected appurtenance in the project area (to scale or 0 o dimensioned) and section(s) as well as elevations (if applicable). Does structure presently exist? /V Proposed date for commencement of construction w In consideration of the issuance of a revocable permit for the structure above indicated, rn U applicant agrees as Follows: CO ry 1. That the structure herein authorized on a revocable permit basis is restricted exclusively to the land above described. 2. That the permit is limited specifically to the type of structure described in this rn w application. 3. That the applicant shall notify the Town Manger, or his duly authorized agent, twenty - o w four hours in advance of the time for commencement of construction, in order that proper inspection may be made by the Town. 4. The applicant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town of Vail, its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability, claims and demands on account of a w injury, loss or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of o w any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with Q1 applicant's activities pursuant to this permit, if such injury, loss, or damage is caused in 00 ti whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the act, omission, ;° error, professional error, mistake, negligence or other fault of the 7 ,: )Iicant, his o contractor or subcontractor or any officer, employee or representat of the applicant, LO va his contractor or his subcontractor. The applicant agrees to investigate, handle respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claims, or demands at the sole expense of the applicant. The applicant also agrees to bear all other expenses relating thereto, including court costs and attorney's fees, whether or not any such liability, claims, or demands alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent. Applicant agrees to procure and maintain, at its own cost, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to ensure against all liability claims, demands and other obligations assumed by the applicant pursuant to this Paragraph 4. Applicants further agree to release the Town of Vail, its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability, claims, demands, or actions or causes of actions whatsoever arising out of any damage, loss or injury to the applicant or to the applicant's property caused by the Town of Vail, its officers, agents and employees while engaged in maintenance or snow removal activities or any other activities whatsoever on Town of Vail property, streets, sidewalks, or rights-of-way. 5. That the permit may be revoked whenever it is determined that the encroachment, obstruction, or other structure constitutes a nuisance, destroys or impairs the use of the right-of-way by the public, constitutes a traffic hazard, or the property upon which the encroachment, obstruction, or structure exists is required for use by the public; or it may be revoked at any time for any reason deemed sufficient by the Town of Vail. 6. That the applicant will remove, at his expense, the encroachment, obstruction, or structure within ten days after receiving notice of any revocation of said permit. 7. That the applicant agrees to maintain any landscaping associated with the encroachment on the right-of-way. 8. That in the event said removal of the encroachment, obstruction, or structure is not accomplished within ten days, the Town is hereby authorized to remowl say � �e and have the right to make an assessment against the property and collect the costs or removal In the same manner as general taxes are collected. 9. That the applicant has read and understands all of the terms and conditions set forth in this application. rship, both signatures) APP j�OVED: oject Planner Ile Director of C�n uinity,,KAvelopment Director_pf P 13lic Works 1 <Z Date D to p,� 113 Date 9 Date 500568 B-604 P-483 03/19/93 15:39 PG 2 OF 2 ��LIT't LOCATION VERIFICATION SUBDIVISION JOB NAME LOT BLOCK FILING ADDRESS The location of utilities, whether they be main trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following Utilities for the accompanying site plan. Authorized Signature Date U.S. West Communications 1-800-922-1987 468-6860 or 949-4530 Public Service Company 949-5781 Gary Hall Holy Cross Electric Assoc. 949-5892 Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Heritage Cablevision T.V. 949-5530 Gary Johnson Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation Distx•ict 476-7480 Fred Haslee NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the Town of Vail, Department of Public Works and to obtain utility locations before digging in any public right-of-way or easement in the Town of Vail. A building hermit is not a street cut permit. A street cut permit must be obtained separately. This form is to verify service availab-0ity and location. This should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. * Please bring a site plan when obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation signatures. 461 upfi�D W lay rb no -95 13,1, gwe� 00C �i t,176— ;A43c/ c7o` t�,eS{off � vw.� 11 Nozl Iwo 6-e Jf r rh 11 A,-') C- i 11 Nozl Iwo 6-e Jf r rh 11 A,-') C- q NO2 78,007- q p q I 115.26" OECX ♦ 9. S' d4'-. Y � v a1' V y a 0' ♦ _ _ y OEOr aJ' ?a 4' `: J.[9' JQr ar - v y ♦ ac � N � � IwN•1t�o. pqO�OAAA OOaa ' 4.7 4.0 4 4, n. -- �61.3' ao 4.0' iI q TR- ar LU Lu 40'a �ga2n . " v .t p O IJ.7' o 4 W se' p O o _ sd' , y Q� Lo O 4.0' p4� q ` co v a 4.9' �fy qZ 9. t' d0' d9' J0.6' V _ 't 140' 10.7' ' 4; OECJE a �0 9. J• �t N :, � � a J 1 I `. 6 a 0' ;, OCor .� 100.98" �.. a S - - - - ..----- - ^. Lrl 4 �• am � a - 3 n C.� n 4 Q G N0218'00'E- ,... J 115.26' ` 0 r - Z t (b s s• ��. Application Date ! PEC MEETING DAT / ABPLICATIC_I FOR A VARIANCZ I. This procedure is required for any project requesting a variance. The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.. A. NAME OF APPLICANT (i�rvtl7N ADHD/KESS _v C 7� �L ///%� l/•>.� G L C1;1 . HONE `� % to V 2- B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE � t . ADDRESS'1� PHONE -� C. NAME OF OWNER(3)_(-type o print) lgV, OWNER(S) SIGNATURES) ADDRESS z Ll Z �. �I�i¢ /� .� /> PHONE D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL DESCRIPT:':)N: LOT BLOCK '—' FILING ADDRESS SLI Z L �C'''� ��'�✓ �s""_' iL . E. FEE $250.00 PAID CK N BY THE FEE HAST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. F. Stamped, addressed envelopes of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a list of their names and mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES. II. A pre -application conference with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to determine if any additional information is needed. No application will be accepted unless it is complete (nust include all items required by the zoning administrator). It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find out about additional SubaiiLLal requirements. III. PEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CO,%24ISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATE. && CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. I MOUNTAIN HAUS VARIANCE APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS -SECTIONS II & III II. Pre -application conference was held with Jim Curnutti on Noveziber 24, 1992. III. A. A variance is requested to allow the Mountain Haus to erect 2 canopy awnings, one each at the :orrn (main lobby) and east entrances to the building. The variance is necessary because the property is non- conforming with respect to setback requirements, and in addition, both canopies will cross property lines (north side -Town of Vail; east side -Vail At::_.etic Club). Any canopy addition at these locatio.s requires a variance. The gra.zting of the variance will not adversely affect existing or potential uses in the vizinity (traffic flow and patterns). It will improve pedestrian safety at both locations, and vehicular efficiency on East Meadow Drive at the main entrance to the building (entrance visibility and parking space deliniation). A similar, larger canopy awning has been in use at the west entrance for many years. Other larger canopy uses are found at neighboring properties such as the Sonnenalp Austria Haus (Buzz's) and the Vail Athletic Club. Addition of the canopy awnings will not adversely impact or affect light and air, utilities, distribution of population, or public safety. This request is in conformance with Vail's compre- hensive plan as it improves safety, signage, traffic flow and neighborhood beautification without negative impact. The proposal has been reviewed and approved by both the Town Council and Design Review staff. B. -E.& G. Provided with this application. Mountain Haus at Vail P.O. Box 1748, Vail, Colorado 81658 • 303/476-2434 • FAX 303/476-3007 For Reservations: 800/237-0922 VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB 352 EAST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, COLORAW 81657 303/476-0700 FAx 303/476.6451 December 12, 1992 Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission 111 So. Frontage Rd. Vail, Co. 81657 Dear Town of Vail, I am writing today in support of the efforts of the Mountain Haus Condominiums to construct a new awning on their east entrance. The Vail Athletic Club approves of this project between our buildings and hopes that its approval can be expedited to allow completion at the earliest possible date. If I can be of any further assistance please don't hesitate to call. Si, /eral eManager CONTRACTOR___ LOCATIC)N OF JOB___ J.f 7T77-7 Q wt KA%uL PIULu i2 L 1 2 TYPILAL ATTALNMENT TD IOU i EESTIUZA UALL T.S.I", i��!5 a. (TYPILAL A\J(UIMIi FRAME) r. J.f 7T77-7 Q wt KA%uL PIULu i2 L 1 2 TYPILAL ATTALNMENT TD IOU i MASONRY i LOIJLRE-TE WALLS ,I RAIJL" PLLIL�s A TE FIBRE PLULs WITR A MII,I(MUM FULL -AUT STREMATH OF MS I b6. TS/A" 4'TE K" SLKEWS -. # i4 = V4"l WITq, A HIUIMUM SNEAK STREM4TH AF 2)58 lbs. ( EESTIUZA UALL T.S.I", i��!5 a. (TYPILAL A\J(UIMIi FRAME) HWH 'TE K" SLREld 14 g M L ` ZIUL-LOATED Z CLIP (TYPILAL) VI (SPACED 3'-4T.t kagZ.4 VERT.) HIJH "TQX' LLREIJ *14 r 2" _ TYPILAL ATTAL14MEIJT M WEM STUU WALL / 4 TYPICAL iy T CLIP ' :.'►; ,a. W - PWH'TS/A' SLREW "i4 ti2" MASONRY i LOIJLRE-TE WALLS ,I RAIJL" PLLIL�s A TE FIBRE PLULs WITR A MII,I(MUM FULL -AUT STREMATH OF MS I b6. TS/A" 4'TE K" SLKEWS -. # i4 = V4"l WITq, A HIUIMUM SNEAK STREM4TH AF 2)58 lbs. ( --- ,� --__ _ ■ ---- -�_�ir `' ;i a v r ;�. 0 MOUNTAIN HAUS ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NORTH, SOUTH, & WEST - TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. Frontage Rd.West, Vail SONNENALP HOTEL (across street to west) 20 Vail Rd., Vail EAST - VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB, 352 E. Meadow Drive, Vail [3�JILpIHG POOL AREA MAIN ENTRANCE 6.a�1�TIMG. 200.00' p z "PICoP�FTT 9-3 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: January 11, 1993 SUBJECT: A request for setback variances to allow for the addition of two awnings at the Mountain Haus, a portion of block 5, Vail Village First Filing, 292 East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association/Preston Jump Planner: Jim Curnutte DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND REQUESTED VARIANCES Preston Jump, General Manager of the Mountain Haus Condominiums, is requesting setback variances to allow for the addition of two new awnings to be located over the north and east building entrances at the Mountain Haus Condominiums. The lot is currently zoned Public Accommodation (PA) District which has a setback requirement of 20 feet from all property lines. The existing setbacks from the Mountain Haus Condominium building vary from as close as 6 inches, to a maximum distance of approximately 30 feet. There are instances where decks, concrete pads, and an existing awning on the west side of the building actually encroach beyond the property lines. The two new awnings, if approved, will match the existing awning on the west side of the building in terms of materials and style, with the exception that the end of the proposed east awning will have a flat front instead of a bullnose. The "half -barrel" shaped awnings will be constructed of hemlock colored tweed over 1 inch square tubular steel. The bottom of the awnings will be covered with white vinyl. The awnings will be placed approximately 8 feet above the ground and will be supported by two 2 inch round steel posts. North side variance request The awning proposed to be placed over the north building entrance is 12 feet long, 6 feet -8 inches wide and 4 feet high (please see the attached drawing). The existing building setback from the north side entrance to the property line is 3 feet -9 inches therefore the proposed awning would encroach 8 feet -3 inches beyond the property line. The proposed encroachment would be located within the Gore Creek Drive right- of-way. If the proposed variance request is granted a revocable right-of-way permit will be required to allow for the construction of the awning within the public right-of-way. East side variance request The awning proposed to be placed over the east side entrance is 10 feet long, 8 feet -2 inches wide, and 4 feet high. This awning will be placed on a portion of the building located over the stairwell which leads to the east side entrance doors. This portion of the building is currently located 5 feet from the east property line, therefore the proposed awning would encroach 5 feet beyond the property line and onto the property owned by the Vail Athletic Club. The applicant has provided a letter from the General Manager of the Vail Athletic Club supporting the variance request and allowing the awning to encroach onto Athletic Club (see attached copy). Since the setback requirement on this lot is 20 feet and awnings are only allowed to encroach into the first four feet of a required setback (Section 18.58.040 of the Vail Municipal Code), a 12 foot setback variance is requested on the north side and a 10 foot setback variance is requested on the east side. BACKGROUND The Mountain Haus Condominium Building was constructed prior to the adoption of the Town's Zoning Code and is considered to be a pre-existing nonconforming use. III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of the criteria and findings in Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested variances. Staff would recommend, however, that the north side variance be limited to 6 feet, which allows the awning to extend 2 feet -3 inches beyond the property line. The staff's recommendation for approval is based on the following factors: A. Consideration of factors: The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures In the vicinity. North side variance request The location of the proposed awning on the north side of the building has been reviewed by the Town's Fire and Public Works Departments. These departments have no technical concerns with the location of the awning as proposed. Fire protection services will by unaffected and the Public Works Department has indicated that the required revocable right-of-way permit can be rescinded if future improvements in the area become necessary. The planning staff, however, feels that allowing the awning to extend 12 feet beyond the face of the building will have a negative effect on the Joading area directly in front of the building. In ad i ion, the in -town shuttle bus and many pedestrians use this corridor. This loading area becomes very congested at times and we feel that the 2 proposed length of the awning will only compound the problem. The applicant may wish to consider carrying the awning across the window area to better identify the building entrance. East side variance request The staff believes that the location of the proposed awning on the east side of the Mountain Haus Building will not have a detrimental effect on existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The area between the Mountain Haus Condominiums and the Vail Athletic Club is used by trash pick up vehicles as well as pedestrians. The location of the proposed awning, directly above and in front of an existing stairwell, will not hinder vehicular or pedestrian circulation. Pedestrian safety may actually be enhanced by reducing ice and snow build up in the stairwell leading to the entrance doors. As mentioned previously, the applicant has provided a letter from the general manager of the Vail Athletic Club authorizing the proposed awning encroachment onto their property. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites In the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. North side variance request Staff believes that the length of the awning being proposed for the north side entrance to the building is excessive. We support the applicants desire to create a better sense of entry on this side of the building, however, we feel that those goals can be accomplished with a shorter awning that does not impede circulation in an already crowded loading area. East side variance request Staff believes that the extent of the requested 10 foot variance on this side of the building is warranted. The awning covers the stairs leading down to the east side entrance doors as well as the platform at the top of the stairs. To require the awning to be shorter than the requested 10 feet would compromise the purpose for which it is intended. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. North side variance request As mentioned previously, the planning staff feels that the extent to which 3 the awning is proposed to extend beyond the face of the building is excessive. It would appear that limiting the length of the awning to five feet would accomplish the applicants desire to improve the appearance of the building entrance without a significant negative impact on the use of the area in front of the building for loading purposes. East side variance request Staff feels that approval of the requested variance on this side of the building will not negatively effect light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities or public facilities and utilities. It would appear that public safety may actually be enhanced be the addition of the proposed awning over the east side stairwell. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owner's of other properties in the same district. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed setback variance on the east side of the building as requested. The staff also recommends approval of the setback variance on the north side of the building, with the condition that the extent of the encroachment beyond the property line be limited to 2 feet -3 inches for a total awning length of 6 feet from the face of the building. 4 The required findings necessary for granting a variance are met, in staff's opinion, as discussed below: 1. Staff believes that granting approval of the variances, as qualified by staff concerning the north side awning, would not constitute a grant of special privilege. The PA zone district development standards on this lot were imposed after the building was constructed, virtually eliminating the ability to add an awning to the facade of the building without obtaining a variance. 2. Staff believes that approving the variances will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, provided that the length of the awning on the north side of the building be reduced from 12 feet to 6 feet. 3. Staff believes that the variances are warranted specifically because the location of the building creates an extraordinary circumstance and physical hardship which warrants some flexibility in the setback requirements for awnings. 5 December 12, 1992 Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission 111 So. Frontage Rd. Vail, Co. 81657 Dear Town of Vail, I am writing today in support of the efforts of the Mountain Haus Condominiums to construct a new awning on their east entrance. The Vail Athletic Club approves of this project between our buildings and hopes that its approval can be expedited to allow completion at the earliest possible date. If I can be ofany further assistance please don't hesitate to call. • Si , i Paa e eral Manager VAIL ATHLETIC CLUB 352 EAST 1v1EA0.)W DRIVE VAIL, COLORAN) 8 165 7 303/476.0700 FAx 303/416.6451 A 4 4 �' "" ^: e -. L �� - -- n • ?rte a � b'+ ��`T h'R ^+i t � + .. a .x'S: n �}'� .��.F _ .-. .. _ « -� -. � 1 m .s 3 W (� CA— ,VO30: ,09 Ni I r h N 1. •f .6" XJ30w --'N ' H ,I'6 i� ^ ,90! ,O ,6H 3 ,0"B �v W2 h h Z'L I sr � a o f OO � 3 ,69 O 4.0 QQ- L� d 6H pLri o Sr � � o'►o CID � O Q a r9 -p v �, r'! Lo - Q 00 Z Q q o 0 h 9, m pI m • 0.9 IIIII'9� � °.9 O LLi1Lb 0 ,OY zi p* Qi W cl- s! o 09 F ti ,S'6 XJ -70 9Z Sl l I I f If 3,, 00, /.JON 22 ip b I Oy o \ m r z/Zill�' I THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on January 11, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. Consideration of: 1. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates, Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin 2. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.32 and Chapter 18.38 of the Vail Municipal Code relating to uses allowed in open space zone districts. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Jim Curnutte 3. A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for the development of single family homes located on Tracts A and B, The Valley, Phase 11/1480 Buffer Creek Rd. Applicant: Steve Gensler/Parkwood Realty Planner: Andy Knudtsen 4. A request for the establishment of a new zone district called Ski Base Recreation II. Applicant: Ron Riley Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin 5. A request for variances for site coverage and setbacks to allow the remodel of a residence located at 315 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Howard and Judy Berkowitz Planner: Shelly Mello 6. A request for a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village Area A, Millrace III to amend the approved development plan to allow for one single family residence and one duplex located at 1335 Westhaven Drive, more specifically described as follows: 7. A part of the SW 1/4, NE 1/4, Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: Beginning at a point of the North-South centerline of said Section 12 whence an iron pin with a plastic cap marking the center of said Section 12 bears S00038'56"W 455.06 feet; thence along said centerline N00038'56"E 122.81 feet to the southerly ROW line of 1-70; thence departing said ROW line N66053'25"E 39.15 feet; thence departing said ROW line S81023'19"E 165.42 feet to a point of curve; thence 122.83 feet along the arc of a 143.20 foot radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 49°08'51" and a chord that bears S1 5057'45"E 119.10 feet; thence S40°32'10"E 3.00 feet; thence 66.30 feet along the arc of a 77.21 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 49012'10" and a chord that bears S1 5056'05"E 64.28 feet; thence S8040'00"W 90.27 feet; thence N38042'24"W 224.55 feet; thence S78010'32"W 101.44 feet to the Point of Beginning. Applicant: MECM Enterprises, Inc. represented by Michael Lauterbach Planner: Jim Curnutte A request for setback variances to allow the construction of two awnings to be located at the Mountain Haus/292 E. Meadow Drive/a portion of Block 5, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Preston Jump representing the Mountain Haus Condo Association --- Planner: Jim Curnutte A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge to allow the construction of a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595 East Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge Planner: Andy Knudtsen A request for a conditional use permit to allow a major arcade (family entertainment center) to be located at the Crossroads Shopping Center, located on Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village First Filing/141 East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Charlie Alexander Planner: Tim Devlin 10. Review of staff policy on vending carts (ie. espresso carts). Staff: Tim Devlin VAK AT7- Fj y1c Q.ux 352 FA57 MRALK,w DArvF VAU , C OLORACt0 31657 3031476-0700 FAX 3031476.6451 0 wo JAN a 1993 January 8, 1993 Mr. Jim cu>rnutte Town of Vail Planning and Environmental COMuission 111 S. Frontage gd. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Jim: This letter confirms that the Vail Athletic Club understands the plans of the Mountain Raus to construct a now awning on their east entrance and that the entrance awning and poles will extend 5 feet onto Vail Athletic Club property. We agree to this construction, subject to a legal agreement between the Mountain Haus and the Vail. Athletic Club, detailing that this agreement is dependent ori the ownership of the Vail Athletic Club building and/or future improvement plans. As president of American Hospitality, Inc., Z am acting as an agent for the Club. owners of the Vail Athletic sincerely, Stan Cope !Z d eniD X=lHid -IIUA SO=LT E6, 90 Hdf PLEASE MAKE CHECKS Tower or VAA�IJL Pw DEPARTNIENT OF CO.-MMUTNITY DEVELONYIENT ti SALES ACTION FORNl 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD Ile RADO 81 657 'ZI IXAME DATE / 1 / '� ' U, 0 1C'041540 ZC),\-NG.-Q,D ADDRESS AAPS I SS.Lo 01 CC -DO 424 15 r UN -T -OP -\i 131-TTLDD4G CODE I Saw 1 c)oo - 01 0000 42-I)s U""Ircm-Ni PLU?.SNG CODE 1 536.001 X- 0 1000 42.115 -1 UMF0R-N-flfECHA2,lCAL CODE 532.001 01 CO, -042415 UNIFCPUNI FRE CODE 536.00 0 1 0000 4 21' 15 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 01000042415 10 TliER CODE 130OKS O1 0000 411 54 3 B L U E F.R LNT S (.\I YL AIR 5) 1 I 57.001 ek3 — 01 OX -3,2412 X EROX COPIES STV -DIES 150.251 01 OCIC-OZ2371 I Pr--,4AI.TY FEES R=--D,SPECTlON'S 0100,0041332 j FLA,4 RE','7F1,'Rr--CPECY, FEE (540 PER )-.R.) 01 0100042322 OFF FOURS D4SPECTION FE - Es 01 L D000 '1412 I CONTRACTORS LICF-\SES MIS I I W"cl) ol C.' -D04) v0 0-mER. F, -:r -.s �Lo--Xo 0 1 CQlj0 414)3 - SIG,4 APPLICATiO14 FEE I s-,o.00l oo�l 01 0000 41413 (ADDITIONAL, SIGNAGE FEE (SI.CJ PER SQ.FT.) 0 1 0000 4240 JWC ART PR WE CT DONATION 01 ONO 41331 IPPE PAID DF -SIGN REVIEIV BOARD FEE 01000042412 I BUILDING -CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER DI KS —Y, 5.00 OL 00 00 21112 TA 01 0000 41010 TAX (41) 01 0000 42371 INVESTIGATION FEE (BUILDING) TOTAL DUE: E -P L N O1 Or�QO 41330 JADDITIONALGJ�F..� -250 -- 5200.001 ol 000041130 I rr) ITIOINAL USE PER-%flT I I 5200.001 O1 0500 41330 1EXTERIOR ALTERATION LESS THAN IOOSQ.Fl-.) S'mco 01 OD00413-,0 I EXTEFJOR ALITRA70N f,\' IORE THAY 100 SQ.FT.) j 5500.00( 01000041330 I SPECIAL DEVEL0P.\f--.W DISTPUCT [NENVI 51.50'0.001 01 CON 4)330 1 SPECIAL DEVEL0PNlE.\7DJSTRJCT INWOR A.M r.\'D I - 0 1 Or'Nl 413--0 --RICT f,%MN'CR Al" MD) I ISPECLAL D!:VEL0P,\fEWDl5l 01' N00 4133 0 ISUBDIVISJOIN 01 ODD041330 VARJAiNCE 01 000041330 I ZONrMG CODE AM F-NDNI EJNTS 5250.001 01 GD0041330 RE-ZONTAG S20J.D31 010000 g. Project Name: Project Description: Project Application ZI Date �b Contact Person and Phone lllf1 �'%U« /i'0�1ys �J� Z- ' FAIL "g Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: N. Legal Description: Lot , Block Filing , Zone l Comments: AW%ZS ON6y 141104147-1��ltGN/�(/C� 7, 5-14W 11ev- ��x'y7z- 1;0xieIC J zvell-xzz AW — s 0,03 rQ-� R� — � 74. 1-0 Motion by: _ Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Design Review Board !;�:: /L - %�� . Town Planner Date: 17Z Date DISAPPROVAL /� Staff Approval a revised 9/4/91 DRB APPLICATION - TOWN OF IL, COLORADO DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DATE OF DRB MEET-ING: THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED ' ********** I. PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION: �-ewx-o►e 1< -5 15, �jn Go/oyec e-grnc�,-� B. TYPE OF REVIEW:' New Construction ($200.00) Minor Alteration ($20.00) Addition ($50.00)�a ConceptualReview($0) C. ADDRESS: ::;;( tyje-z�o.yrrev-� D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot Block Subdivision If property is described by a meets and bounds legal description, please provide on a separate sheet and.a attach to this application. E. ZONING: MIt u i zI� F. LOT AREA: If required, applicant must provide a current stamped survey showing lot area. 13oZ c G. NAME OF APPLICANT: ' /IDu�� I lj CM �am� ni �55oG►z7��^^ Mailing Address: Phone H. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: -� z�- � �5 Mailing Address: Po ga► k J do V�-d-o Phone - 42 FL 3 I. NAME OF OWNERS: JffF--Wus �c� o ��► sSaC► zt✓� *SIGNATURE (S) : _ Mailing Address: Phone q;� 4O - J. Condominium Approval if applicable. K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at the time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when applying for a building permit, please identify the accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the table below, to ensure the correct fee is. aido� p FEE PAID: FEE SCHEDULE: VALUATION FEF $ d - $ 10,000 $ 20.00 $ 10,001 - $ 50,000 $ 50.00 $ 50,001 - $ 150,000 $100.00 $150,001 - $ 500,000 $200.00 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $400.00 $ Over $1,000,000 $500.00 * DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL EXPIRES ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL APPROVAL UNLESS A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND CONSTRUC':11ON IS STARTED. **NO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OWNER'S SIGNATURE 1 II. PRE-APPLICATIO$ MEETING 0 A pre -application meeting with a member of the planning staff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additional application information is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to determine if there are additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamline the approval process for your project. III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate property lines, building lines and building corners. All trees to be removed must be taped. All site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a conceptual approval and a final approval. Applicants should plan on presenting their development proposal at a minimum of two meetings before obtaining final approval. C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB docket until such time as the item has been republished. D. The following items may, at the discretion of the zoning administrator, be approved by the Community Development Department staff (i.e. a formal hearing before the DRB may not be required): a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changes which do not alter the existing plane of the building; and b. Building addition proposals not visible from any other lot or public space. At the time such a proposal is submitted, applicants must include letters from adjacent property owners and/or from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association stating the association approves of the addition. E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow, wetland, etc), a hazard study must be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard report prior to the issuance of a building permit. Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Planner prior to DRB application to determine the relationship of the property to all mapped hazards. F. For all residential construction: a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the inside face of the exterior structural walls of the building; and b. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a four foot distance from the exterior face of the building walls or supporting columns. G. If DRB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be resolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit. 2 IV. NEW CONSTRTC =,N A. Three copies of a recent topographic survey, stamped by a licensed surveyor, at a scale of 1" = 20' or larger, on which the following information is provided: 1. Lot area. 2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or more, in which case, 5' contour intervals may be accepted. 3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a point one foot above grade. 4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittent streams, etc.). 5. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.), centerline of stream or creek, required creek or stream setback, 100 -year flood plain and slopes of 400 or more, if applicable. 6. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information should be clearly stated on the survey so that all measurements are based on the same starting point. This is particularly important for height measurements. See Policy On Survey Information, for more information regarding surveys. 7. Locations of the following: a. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales, etc. must be shown. b. Exact location of existing utility sources and proposed service lines from their source to include: able TV Sewer Gas Telephone Water Electric C. Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals to be located on site or in the right-of-way adjacent to the site. Revocable permits from the Town of Vail are required for improvements in the right-of-way. d. Property lines - distances and bearings and a basis of bearing must be shown. e. All easements (Title report must also include existing easement locations) 8. Existing and finished grades. 9. Provide spot elevations of the street, and a minimum of one spot elevation on either side of the lot, 25 feet out from the side property lines. 8. Site Plan 1. Locations of the following: a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site. b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spot elevations must be shown. 2. All existing improveme.,ts including structures, landscaped areas, service areas, storage areas, walks, driveways, off-street parking, loading areas, retaining walls (with top and bottom of wall spot elevations), and other existing site improvements. 9 3. Elegy .tions of top of roof ridctcaW (with existing and proposed (wades shown underneath). These elevations and grades must be provided in order for the staff to determine building height. All ridge lines should be indicated on the site plan. ` Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicated on the site plan with corresponding finished and existing grade elevations. 4. Driveway grades may not exceed 8% unless approved by the Town Engineer. C. Landscape Plan (1" = 20' or larger) - 3 copies required 1. The following information must be provided on the landscape plan. The location of existing 4" diameter or larger trees, the location, size, spacing and type (common and latin name) of all existing and proposed plant material. All trees to be saved and to be removed must also be indicated. The plan must also differentiate between existing and proposed vegetation. 2. Complete the attached landscape materials list. 3. The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for plant material following its installation. 4. Existing and proposed contour lines. NOTE: In order to clarify the inter -relation of the various development proposal components, please incorporate as much of the above information as possible onto the site plan. D. Sian off from each utility company verifying the location of utility service and availability (see attached). E. A preliminary title report must accompany all submittals, to insure property ownership and location of all easements on property. F. Architectural Plans (1/8" = 1' or larger, 1/4" is preferred scale for review) 3 copies required. 1. Scaled floor plans and all elevations of the proposed development. Elevations must show both existing and finished grades. 2. One set of floor plans must be "red -lined" to show how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was calculated. 3. Reductions of all elevations and the site plan (8- 1/2" x 1111) for inclusion in PEC and/or Town Council memos may be requested. 4. Exterior surfacing materials and material colors shall be specified on the attached materials list. This materials list must be completed and submitted as a part of DRB application. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented to the Design Review Board meeting. G. Zone check list (attached) must be completed if project is located within the Single -Family, Primary/Secondary or Duplex zone districts. H. Photos of the existing site and where applicable, of adjacent structures. 4 I. The.Zoni._j Administrator and/or DRB --Kay require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samples and o"-.,er materials (including a model) if deemed necessary to determine whether a project will comply with Design Guidelines. V. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopment proposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopment proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requirements set forth above, provided all important specifications for the proposal including colors and materials to be used are submitted. VI. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL A. Original floor plans with all specifications shown. B. Three sets of proposed floor plans 1/8" = 1' or larger (1/4" = 1' is preferred) C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and proposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevations with existing and proposed grades shown underneath. D. Elevations of proposed addition. E. Photos of the existing structure. F. Specifications for all materials and color samples on materials list (attached). At the request of the Zoning Administrator you may also be required to submit: G. A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability. See attached utility location verification form. H. A site improvement survey, stamped by registered professional surveyor. I. A preliminary title report, to verify ownership of property, which lists all easements. VII. FINAL SITE PLAN Once a building permit has been issued, and construction is underway, and before the Building Department will schedule a framing inspection, two copies of an Improvement Location Certificate survey (ILC) stamped by a registered professional engineer must be submitted. The following information must be provided on the ILC: A. Building location(s) with ties to property corners, i.e. distances and angles. B. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot. C. All utility service line as-builts, showing type of material used, and size and exact location of lines. D. Drainage as-builts. E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner. F. All property pins are to be either found or set and stated on improvement survey. G. All easements. H. Building floor elevations and all roof ridge elevations with existing and proposed grades shown under the ridge lines. 5 VIII.CONCEPTUAL DE. 3N REVIEW A. Submittal requirements: The owner or authorized agent of any project requiring design approval as prescribed by this chapter may submit plans for conceptual review by the Design Review Board to the Department of Community Development. The conceptual review is intended to give the applicant a basic understanding of the compatibility of their proposal with the Town's Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommended primarily for applications more complex than single- family and two-family residences. However, developers of single-family and two-family projects shall not be excluded from the opportunity to request a conceptual design review. Complete applications must be submitted 10 days prior to a scheduled DRB meeting. The following information shall be submitted for a conceptual review: 1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals twenty feet; 2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials and a description of the character of the proposed structure or structures; 3. Sufficient information to show the proposal complies with the development standards of the zone district in which the project is to be located (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations, number of parking spaces, etc.); 4. Completed DRB application form. B. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, the Department of Community Development shall review the submitted materials for general compliance with the appropriate requirements of the zoning code. If the proposal is in basic compliance with the zoning code requirements, the project shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptual review. If the application is not generally in compliance with zoning code requirements, the application and submittal materials shall be returned to the applicant with a written explanation as to why the Community Development Department staff has found the project not to be in compliance with zoning code requirements. Once a complete application has been received, the DRB shall review the submitted conceptual review application and supporting material in order to determine whether or not the project generally complies with the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews. The property owner or his representative shall be present at the DRB hearing. 0 LIST OF MATERIALS ' NAME OF PROJECT: D t4 Ai v,t �7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The following information is required for submittal to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Other Cm-,G►2 1;440ck �� B. LANDSCAPING: �D U Ca 1J lc �a� r o r7� Ale- -94-14- Name of Designer: Phone: /V 4A PLANT MATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size* *Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous trees. Minimum height for coniferous trees is 6 feet. 7 PLANT MATERIA;: PROPOSED SHRUBS EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED Botanical Name Common Ime Ouantity Size* *Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is 5 gallon. Type Square Footage GROUND COVERS 49ff SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting plan on the list below and provide the wattage, height above grade and type of light proposed. D. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining walls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback is 3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property is 6 feet. 0 LITY LOCATION VERIFICATIC A SUBDIV- ;N JOB NAME LOT BLOCK FILING ADDRESS The location and availability of utilities, whether they be main trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following utilities for the accompanying site plan. Authorized Signature Date U.S. West Communications 1-800-922-1987 468-6860 or 949-4530 Public Service Company 949-5781 Gary Hall Holy Cross Electric Assoc. 949-5892 Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Heritage Cablevision T.V. 949-5530 Steve Hiatt Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District 476-7480 Fred Haslee NOTE: 1. This form is to verify service availability and location. This should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. 2. For any new construction proposal, the applicant must provide a completed utility verification form. 3. If a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative should not directly on the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be spelled out in detail in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company to resolve identified problems. 4. If the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, and no comments are made directly on the form, the Town will presume that there are no problems and that the development can proceed. 5. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the Town of Vail, Department of Public Works and to obtain utility locations before digging in any public right-of-way or easement in the Town of Vail. A building permit is not a street cut permit. A street cut permit must be obtained separately. * Please bring a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation signatures. Fire flow needs must be addressed. D ZONE CHECK FOR PRI R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS DATE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot Block Filing ADDRESS: OWNER PHONE ARCHITECT PHONE ZONE DISTRICT PROPOSED USE **LOT SIZE Allowed Existing Proposed Total Height (30) (33) Total GRFA Primary GRFA + 425 = Secondary GRFA + 425 = Setbacks Front 20' Sides 15' / Rear 15' Water Course Setback (30)(50) Site Coverage Landscaping Retaining Wall Heights 3'/6' Parking Reqrd Garage Credit (300)(600)(900)(1200) Drive: Permitted Slope 8% Actual Slope Date approved by Town Engineer: View Corridor Encroachment: Yes No ??? Environmental/Hazards: 1) Flood Plain 2) Percent Slope 3) Geologic Hazards a) Snow Avalanche b) Rockfall c) Debris Flow 4) Wetlands Previous conditions of approval (check property file): Does this request involve a 250 Addition? How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this request? **Note: Under Sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code, lots zoned Two Family and Primary/Secondary which are less than 15,000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The Community Development Department may grant an exception to this restriction provided the applicant meets the criteria set forth under Sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code including permanently restricting the unit as a long-term rental unit for full- time employees of the Upper Eagle Valley. 10 s RECD NOV O APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT TO ERECT OR MAINTAIN A STRUCTURE ON A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (Please type or print) DATE OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME OF APPLICANT Fence Wall Landscaping Other -V '5* %e/S LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE SERVED: IAT BLACK SUBDIVISIOW*11A1"'*1r'z4t'!K (If necessary, attach description on separate sheet). Corner lot Inside lot DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE OR ITEMS) INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY: ��s Attach 51ans showing encroachment, property line, sidewalks, curbs, intakes, hydrants, meters, manholes, any other affected appurtenance in the project area (to scale or dimensioned) and section(s) as well as elevations (if applicable). Does structure presently exist? - A Proposed date for commencement of construction In consideration of the issuance of a revocable permit for the structure above indicated, applicant agrees as follows: 1. That the structure herein authorized on a revocable permit basis is restricted exclusively to the land above described. 2. That the permit is limited specifically to the type of structure described in this application. 3. That the applicant shall notify the Town Manger, or his duly authorized agent, twenty-four hours in advance of the time for commencement of construction, in order that proper inspection may be made by the Town. 4. The applicant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town of Vail, its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability, claims and demands on account of injury, loss or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with applicant's activities pursuant to this permit, if such injury, loss, or damage is caused in whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence or other fault of the applicant, his contractor or subcontractor or any officer, employee or representative of the applicant, his contractor or his subcontractor. The applicant agrees to investigate, handle respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claims, or demands at the sole expense of the applicant. The applicant also agrees to bear all other expenses relating thereto, including court costs and attorney's fees, whether or not any such liability, claims, or demands alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent. Applicant agrees to procure and maintain, at its own cost, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to ensure against all liability claims, demands and other obligations assumed by the applicant pursuant to this Paragraph 4. Applicants further agree to release the Town of Vail, its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability, claims, demands, or actions or causes of actions whatsoever arising out of any damage, loss or injury to the applicant or to the applicant's property caused by the Town of Vail, its officers, agents and employees while engaged in maintenance or snow removal activities or any other activities whatsoever on Town of Vail property, streets, sidewalks, or rights-of-way. 5. That the permit may be revoked whenever it is determined that the encroachment, obstruction, or other structure constitutes a nuisance, destroys or impairs the use of the right-of-way by the public, constitutes a traffic hazard, or the property upon which the encroachment, obstruction, or structure exists is required for use by the public; or it may be revoked at any time for any reason deemed sufficient by the Town of Vail. 6. That the applicant will remove, at his expense, the encroachment, obstruction, or structure within ten days after receiving notice of any revocation of said permit. 7. That the applicant agrees to maintain any landscaping associated with the encroachment on the right-of-way. 8. That in the event said removal of the encroachment, obstruction, or structure is not accomplished within ten days, the Town is hereby authorized to remove same and have the right to make an assessment against the property and collect the costs or removal in the same manner as general taxes are collected. 9. That the applicant has read and understands all of the terms and conditions set forth in this application. 10. Special conditions: CM. Signature of'Property Owner Dat (If joint ownership, both signatures) APPROVED: Director of Comm ity Development Date Town Manager j Ak 1Z Date 3 Date UTILITY LOCATION VERIFICATION SUBDIVISION JOB NAME \\ " LOT BLOCK FILING ADDRESS The location of utilities, whether they be main trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following utilities for the accompanying site plan. Authorized Signature Date U.S. West Communications 1-800-922-1987 468-6860 or 949-4530 Public Service Company 949-5781 Gary Hall Holy Cross Electric Assoc. 949-5892 Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Heritage Cablevision T.V. 949-5530 Gary Johnson Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District 476-7480 Fred Haslee .77 /�— z-cw cl— Z T7— NOTE: z NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the Town of Vail, Department of Public Works and to obtain utility locations before digging in any public right-of-way or easement in the Town of Vail. A building permit is not a street cut permit. A street cut permit must be obtained separately. This form is to verify location. This should preparing your utility installations. service availability and be used in conjunction with plan and scheduling * Please bring a site plan when obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation signatures. .......................... .. 01 00D041540 I ZO,',-NG AND ADDRESS MAPS (' 55.00 1 ADDITIONAL GRFA "250" 01 000042415 U; MOR -M BUILDM; CODE $50.00 5200.00 O1 0000 42415 ( UNIFORM PLWaNG CODE ( 536.00 010000 41330 010000 42415 I UNIFORIM IJECHAN'ICAL CODE I 532.00 1 SPECIAL DEVELOPNIEN7 DISTRICT [NEM 01 M42415 I UNIMORM FIRE CODE I 536.00 51.000.00 010000 42415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE I I 530.00 01 0000 41330 01 0000 42415 I OTHER CODE BOOKS I : VARIANCE 01 0000 41543 I BLUE PRPgTS (MYLARS) I I S7.001 5250.00 01000-042412 XEROX COPIES / STUDIES I SO.25 I 010000 O1 0000 -".2371 I PENALTY FEES/ RE-D4SPECTIONS CO%t vlENTS: ; 010000 41332 1 PLAN REVIEW RE -CHECK FEE (S40 PER HR.] 01 0000 42323 OFF HOURS L^ISPECTION FEES O1 000041412 I CONTRACTORS UCENSES FEES 010000 41330 I FEES 010000 41413 _OTHER SIGN APPLICATION FEE S20.00I 010000 41413 I ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE FEE (51.00 PER SQ.FI.J 01 0000 42440 I VTC ART PROJECT DONATION r 4 ' 010000 41331 I PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE I f 010000 * 01 0000 21112 TAX 4Z) * 01 0000 41010 TAX (4Z) .......................... .. PECAPPLICATIOh;FEES.' 010000 41330 1 ADDITIONAL GRFA "250" 5200.001 010000 41330 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I 5200.00 010000 41330 1 EXTERIOR ALTERATION LESS THAN 100 S .FT. 5200.00 010000 41330 1 EXTERIOR ALTERATION f MORE THAN 100 sQ.FT.i 1 5500.00 01 0000 41330 1 SPECIAL DEVELOPNIEN7 DISTRICT [NEM S1500.001 010000 41330 1 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAJOR AMEND 51.000.00 01 0000 413.0 1 SPECIAL DEVELOPI%fENT DISTRICT MINOR ANENDI 5200.001 01 0000 41330 I SUB DI VI S 1 ON 01 000041330 : VARIANCE 5250.00 010000 41330 1 ZONING CODE )NENDMENTS 5250.00 010000 41330 TRE - ZONNG 5200.001 010000 CO%t vlENTS: ; .......................... .. H . Ddlt.GtHG_ POOL AREA e.L.-8166.74'. MAIN ENTRANCE : �1bTyMG G t.a tJ � E�.8166:,:96'. , ttu.t8166:7��`, K( -N' bY:MOLAlA1N HAUS VAIL ;10-I:i-92 ; 6::38fAl ; -+ MOUNTAIN HAUS VAIL;# 2 ti � w APPLICATION DATE �ZGl//ANNIE ADDLIGTYOIIi �, .:�, 19921 (Please Print or Type) r�5/ NAME OF PROJECT _ Mountain Haus NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING -Thurston PONE 476-2434._w ADDRESS 292 E. Meadow Dr. Vail NAME OF OWNER PHONE ADDRESS SIGMTURY Ol OWNER LOCATION OF. PROJECT 1 marquee .tit _north _entragee to hotel -Tmarquee at east entrance to hotel DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTage above THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGN/AWNING (FREE STANDING, WALL, PROJECTING, ETC), INCLUDE SIGN MESSAGE.Nnrt-h mar uPP Lo 10gk same as existing 1 on west side. East marquee to be same "� - barrel" shape, but to have a flat front instead of h111noAe as ;n nt}har_ See picture for signage requests. B. SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL Same as existing awning - S„nhrN11B ^ Hemlock Tweed #4605. Lettering to be same - Off White C. SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO D. HEIGHT OF SIGN ABOVE GRADE 8i above on valance E. DESCRIBE LIGHTING (EXISTING OR PROPOSED) lights to be installed in bottom of awning facipg down to illuminate walkway. V iN bottom to hp in-tw 1Pr1 r.& fini.h nff hnttnm F. LENGTH OF BUSINEIF FRONTAGE (FT) G. CONDOMINIUM ASSOiiC''-IATION APPROVAL (ATTACH) H. FEE; $20.00 PLUS $1.00 PER SQUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA, PAID CHECK NO. DATE E,QUIB&D MATERIALS UBMITT&D WITH AEP IQjjQN 1. VSite Plan 2. �T Elevations showing exact location of sign or awning on the building 3. Photographs showing proposed location 9. �- Colored scale drawing 5. —T Sample of proposed materials 6. Photograph of sign if available Sign Administrator biell Au. 41AA-k- WJ AM&ICAN AWNING COANY A division of: COLORADO STEEL, INC. 2049 Wadsworth Boulevard • Lakewood, Colorado 80215-2032 • (303) 232-1612 • FAX (303) 232-0569 Re: Mountain Haus canopies U 4 9 Vis" y Both canopies are to be attached above their propsective doorways. See attached drawing of attachment procedures. You may look at several of our awning and canopy installations in Vail, as typical American Awning installations, such as, Food & Deli Market, The Ore House, Vail Vision, and The Penthouses (in Cascade Village.) The awnings are a welded frame made of 1" square tubular steel with 2" round steel posts. If you have any questions, please call Annie Egan 232-1612 Mountain HOOgjj* Nov t992, Fe, t Town of Vail Design Review Board 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 November 3, 1992 Attention: Mr. Tim Devlin Dear Mr. Devlin, The Mt. Haus Condominium Association would like to install awnings at both the north and east entrances of our building to match the existing awning on our west entrance. The proposed awnings received approval from the Mt. Haus Board of Managers at the September meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. Please call me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 476-2434. Sincerely, Terence H. Thurston Assistant General Manager i� CONTRACTOR._ ORDMR NO. LOCATE( -)N OF JOf3___ ---__.DATE EXI5TIIrlz� QALL (TYPICAL A\JAJIAIls EKAME) r HWH'TEW 5CKEIL1 14 iN a Y L JJ j29a. 'LIAJL - DATED L,CLIA (rxpIL1l�..) (SPACED k S' Ki H8RIZA VERT.) - HWH "TS/A:' 3LREW �i4 r Zy (TMLAL ATTALNMEAIT 18 l kdaM STUD WALL Q� n 0 TYPICAL �Zr CLIP HWH'Ts/A' SLREW 11M t?-" 'RAWC PLUG " ELL ii7' TYPICAL ATTALPMENT T 6) MA! MRY i LOKILRETE WALLS RA�Lf� PLLALiS: A JUTE FIBRE PLUL WiTK A MIUIMUM FULL -AUT ST91MATH 8F Q�5 + TS/A 4 "TE K 5LRE1,15 # i4 . Vii WITP A MIMIMUM SPEAR STRU16TH &F 2 S8 (%n. / I/ n O O -, D = M O C) Om = D D Z F) O D n O� -� c D co � z on 0� n D H �_ n O D n Z m D m -ni D O r n = m � z m x 0O z > m 0 m m <„ c) n Dr r O i M 0 m m m m O (n CD m p c m O c - w 3 m O T n i n T n -i D D m m Z D WCD 7 Z (a-0 (n a..o w w O Z z� � m Z 0. w m Z 3 O O -.0 * 0 0 0 >>Oo-. m Z z z p O 0 m �0<amw r _ Z TCOD m - z O m� T - < cn M z7 D -0,0..0 - z� D Q'c) > m w O 6 —0 T O O M = CD cn w 0 - m aCz°-0 O 1 O cn Cn CD M O T =3 O G) r c H > DD DC 9 z D z N rC m Z M 0 xi M � MCzJ G) �C 31 � 17 m O n n O N z z I G7 o D N z O z O cn Z O H Z p 0 Ln Z p lz7 n r FTC C7 1 w En O T. C=i N O Z r w t7 O ,4 OO O_ v H W td I I H ty 'Z Z, t7 G7 L (�Ricoo D C"' Z CD -0 CD td yw�o-D< nO, -0ao(D O �C � ,o X OO 3 w - x< 6,< -r-cl C1 0 0,� Cb C!] ' 0 u' O Q- �• C oa °o 2.?�wcc m m m m cD m (n CD D Z -.ow c C 0 6-0 < c - w 3 O w < L) aco --w m O to w n 0 7 Q- CD o _ n� :3 ocn W 0 w o z a -CL CD a� -• a " D WCD 7 D (a-0 (n a..o w w O 0o -*-70 z� � 0),o,o CD 0. w � D O -i - 2 -i C O O -.0 * 0 0 0 >>Oo-. _ � + a p O 0 �0<amw r _ Z TCOD m - z O m� T - < cn M z7 0 O -0,0..0 - z� O M Q'c) > m w O 6 —0 T O CL S CDD cn m 0 M = CD cn w 0 - m aCz°-0 c 1 O cn Cn CD M w n (D T =3 O D w � D 2 --IM D r X - 0< Z K DI i Z D C rl m p m m m O m M D Z T c r m < T m O .--1O L) cn O Z o _ o z z (n D D D o z O Z m M L7 z z 0 0 D r 0 Z � p _ N r _ Z d m - z O W A T - < cn M z7 G > n O c v z m M M 0 M I < n z z Iz o D cn O cn 0 FTC 1 0 Z ? I H r y O z---1 z I 21 • L7 O z R� p H C U) - D r m �- a c z z m X O O_ I n DI i Z D C rl m G i� r z z z m m m O M D Z Z = o m Ln :;E :E C7 m = r � r z z D z -4 M (n D 0 2 z D O n D o 0 muo M v o n O Z M D cn O r z c Z 'n M 'n m m ❑❑❑ K MCO M M C � n r - r 0 nczi � D H 1:1 El T O r C C z K O co D z O O z H �-d a It 7 v C C�rJ M r� a 7d in Cl) L7 � O Z O c cn U) v H10 r H G) a �- M 7J D 9 z t= t7 < 7 tj D Z r z C 0 0 z K m m v (v cj)M m LI)n n C m D C D Z Z D M C7J A (� X C A D z z n m z < 5 C)D Dr 0 M z r z m Om cn Cn m C. M o ME m , 3 o m can P* O n 3 0 O Z •G N CL < M co C 3 C7 r 1 LTJ Z T V M c) N m o M 2 O � M > n .D m D C mv O m D Z T c r m < z O A L) U) 0 o 0 o _ o z z (n z > p o z O Z m M L7 z z 0 0 D r 0 � n H 00 D _ N _ M d m - z O W A T - < m z7 G O M VALUATION m o 0 � 0 M H m -0 0 c m o o c r m oo O a = r. 0 r zz z O O n L7 z z Z 0 D r L I u, O0 N CO - In O In O O O DI + Fd �-d Ml n n ~ I ~ O � � o rn o a o 0 I ! y �v9aS/CD W 4- O w w 0 a 0 O M o 0 � 0 0 � 0 0 0 o o• oo O C - - T m O M C z 0 0 0 a 0 O O cn C31, cn 0 M q oo m 0 C z O O Ul CID C.TI _1 Oi Z > _ n m O z > D 0 Z O n Q r O � 0 W 0 Z 7J G7 Q Z 0- ---4n O D O Z -i Z o m --4> O 0 2 m 0 zrn Z m t n m Q C) in Z n D D r m r G r 0 m -4 -4 Om -1 0 C7 c _ n O mm Z z m mz �. O N fJ rm- m z _ 0 3 { j) _ Z Z C) 0 N� 0 0 > Co0 0��_.. 0 > 0 O c� n0 Z < < �) < r < <r n N n O 'a a n O t7 o N rm Or m w p > '\ A O L 0 '< Z 3 p G) O 7 C) OO > CI + C v p 0 C O < C O 0 m L7 mm p ( z 4%�. m O m H C. S.,< n N -1 CL f n C Q Z m Z _l Z mt S 2 m o Z z > o 0 z Z O ^ o C co O O m J„ O O tO 3 0 CD II I < � v = - O � Co r O p " > o n O �z 0 O > m n (n m > r N = C7 I O En N N m F O < o z C - > a w=— a dao mw r nnr �nZ 'rD D r r by 0 r O co _i Z 00 m m O m -0 m x i m= m� COD 0 3 0 O V, CL0 0 < X 0 C o 7 .r A V Mm N 9 D Z M m i o O ro m O Q m x m 0 O Z L- 0 O Q N m r m > > O O m Om O c - m O rn r mT-Y �. O N fJ z Z O _ 0 > rZ j) _ Z N� 0 > Co0 > O c� n0 Z O' U 7 0 .� r Z?m n N n O 'a a n O t7 o N rm Or m w p > '\ A O L 0 '< Z 3 p G) O 7 C) OO > CI + C v p 0 C O < C O 0 '� � ( z `�.O < C � z H C. S.,< n N -1 CL f n C Z m _l O O O m z z mt m o z > o 0 z > O ^ o O O m J„ O O tO 3 0 CD II I < = - O � Co r O p " > n O �z 0 O > m n (n m > r N = C7 I O En N N m F O < o z C - > a w=— a c > o N m I Z :3ca '� o m -j VAlUA7i > ' �. O c l7 fv Z— CJ n L7 r cD p z Z r- O C N r m m -j r r r p C O D .. O '.-� .-. CJ O O I Z D -mi 2 m = -OI Z 0 r p o rn vi ? T c Z7 0 z > r x m z 0 O Z O 3 �' N Kp m r r n O > m T CD p� a -�I >l m > r o Z�I \ m 0 i ,, -o �� n m o 0 0 I N m m 0 �a�ac N cc (p_ I o:3cr a � I Z aa'c nc > I ( I N \ �e m m N O .a_no -ni>>c3 n Q C-)=3 CD 0 Ot a, p m CL O _a O aI m\. o cD a=ac CD c N �' vii vi n �' I m a T I I A V Mm N 9 D Z M m i o O ro m O Q m x m 0 O Z L- 0 O Q N m • MEMEORANDUM TO: Town of Vail Community Planning FROM: Preston Jump RE: Front Entry Snow Melt DATE: 10-5-92 Valley Wide Plumbing and Gallegos Masonry have been contracted to replace the snow melt system and pavers at the north entrance to Mountain Haus. The project has approval of management as well as the Board of Directors of Mt. Haus. Thank you for your cooperation in issuing the necessary Building and Design Review permits. ---Since ely,; Preston J mp General -Manager Mountain Haus at Vail P.O. Box 1748, Vail, Colorado 81658 • 303/476-2434 • FAX 303/476-3007 For Reservations: 800/237-0922 El �I�TIHC. Gsar�G• �A l �Ce, W.vps -ro QW. MAP iH 5LjILAIH6 POOL AREA F -L.+8166.74`_ r�-i•�e�.cP� MAIN ENTRANCE xts�.I�YiMG . ��Ifaol�r 1 �5tort� 816_6-,96' &L.»-8166:,72 d F GO riC. tD R^ i Hp G C i PA -!H C-TYP•i -_ --� -- - $ 870 42' E 200.00' _ Pa='ot�aA ��rtc.�L. PFePEFTT WN! MA�E-o ' P.bv Ufa —7TOP OPS O N .6 C G+ H I v r— 'S I T B P L-A- t-1 G.vtCb Grr!1a b - ->r -I.KCW A-UHIHG, / I c'/.�� at ovt� ��✓�C'� •--r . �- - t moi! C7 t6- W. -T 6, v Q-- - • ' — e-P>e'C cd F r IG .. 1 1r-1' T P• T L.1 G P L.►G6.'� At-JHIMd ` _.. V-..,./ PC'1/EICb% N \ ML. -o-.8166.13 / GxI T -H; c -rim H r -5L C, g. aL.- 8166..6_-- Pmom IHA- `4; PA --H, C.451.Or-w — %14rtHG Gs-I�t� il�-� 8166.8 L•'"816b.13': �_ '—'--_ --- _ � ►�. �- TL7 r'1.dTC.i-i r -M= �G�`fLQGIG - _ Z �► CC - HOTl: P�►r! 3LGt'l,L. '� ' . ti7�-lS't'IH` t►I�4dE. L( .v.._-- , . `` � ` aI- �,br►I�I-'r �gc•IPL :-sLOPM GF 1E•►••1'ffiT_,trfG GeJI�Is API=ON L hdD �'��.T'4� \\�� /�� ----- �/ tai-tT'!� L.11-411Lof - boaa C.IFECw- GCI%WM Ste` •.. INSP-tCTION REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL DATE 1/- Z �- y JOB NAME CALLER _ 44/��eY READY FOR INSPECTION:,wd.ON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM LOCATION: BUILDING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ FOUNDATION / STEEL Cl FRAMING ROOF & SHEER El PLYWOOD NAILING ❑ INSULATION PLUMBING: ❑ UNDERGROUND ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. ❑ ROUGH/ WATER ❑ GAS PIPING ❑ POOL/ H. TUB ❑ SHEETROCK NAIL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ FINAL ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: ❑ TEMP. POWER HEATING `ZxaaJ ❑ ROUGH ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ CONDUIT ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ ❑ ❑ FINAL ❑ FINAL APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: DATE 9% INSPECTOR F47SHOP NWNAL INSPECTION'S COMPLETED The items below need to be complete before giving a permit a final C of 0. Please check off in the box provided. FINAL PLUMBING DATE: FINAL MECHANICAL DATE: aIMPROVEMENT SURVEY RESID. NAME: DATE: FINAL ELECTRICAL DATE: FINAL BUILDING EAST SIDE: WEST SIDE: DATE: TEMPORARY C OF 0 DATE: ElCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATE: LANDSCAPING DUE DATE: Project Application Project Name: / ��c%N TR;ex 4k05-- F k05- CJ Date Q &i (vor Project Description: L oq'as d-'IIALNPC-�.ssa fP � Xt�*rte ��'rtC.li..sq TiiN�1 Contact Person and Phone -TeecpIC-e (n u►^� t�►� L� / t� a Y 7 Owner, Address and Phone: !" tC�c'I�-�7r� lT�% `—C��l�r��c�''1/� /755 C rCclr�/y S Q -' -e Architect, Address and Phone: Legal DescriptionJ,.�(4 ©'h i, Filing V Zone • Comments: ctcal` of ` `a �N i cJ —{ Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL r Summary: CA,) Town Planner Staff Approval Date: CJ�� MuNa • revised 9/4/91 DRB APPLICATION - TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO REC'©SEP 2 1 ' DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: 992 DATE OF DRB MEETING: ********** THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED ********** I. PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION: ?Pr IN T app ( C W i C Pre S 1- ar 16 ro iv M �k enc Srt1 tvc, t -r rte. a -C'x�fr ter'- 6,,..`:Q d B. TYPE OF REVIEW: New Construction ($200.00) Minor Alteration ($20.00) Addition ($50.00) Conceptual Review ($0) C. ADDRESS: 2g2 t'w�` /;r7eadawd(,)�� D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot Block Subdivision tf'n c ej /(r:�� If property is described by a meets and bounds legal description, please provide on a separate sheet and attach to this application. E. ZONING: F. LOT AREA: If required, applicant must provide a current stamped survey showing lot area. G. NAME OF APPLICANT: MT 6,vdom Mailing Address: P0. fad x ! 2 y , Phone 4126 _ I. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: �y-tv[ .0 /ftitit/51�� Mailing Address: (PO • 84 x /? 5/" VfYi c- Cd d-/657 Phone yJ14 -i t/3 NAME OF OWNERS* *SIGNATURE( : - Mailing Address: Phone J. Condominium Approval if applicable. K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at the time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when applying for a building permit, please identify the accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the table below, to ensure the correct fee is paid. FEE SCHEDULE: VALUATION $ 0 - $ 10,000 $ 10,001 - $ 50,000 $ 50,001 - $ 150,000 $150,001 - $ 500,000 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $ Over $1,000,000 FEE PAID: $ 420.0 ir.00 $100.00 $200.00 $400.00 $500.00 * DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL EXPIRES ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL APPROVAL UNLESS A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED. **NO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OWNER'S SIGNATURE 01 II. PRE-APPLICATION14-KEETING: -./ A pre -application meeting with a member of the planning staff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additional application information is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to determine if there are additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamline the approval process for your project. III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate property lines, building lines and building corners. All trees to be removed must be taped. All site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a conceptual approval and a final approval. Applicants should plan on presenting their development proposal at a minimum of two meetings before obtaining final approval. C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB docket until such time as the item has been republished. D. The following items may, at the discretion of the zoning administrator, be approved by the Community Development Department staff (i.e. a formal hearing before the DRB may not be required): a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changes which do not alter the existing plane of the building; and b. Building addition proposals not visible from any other lot or public space. At the time such a proposal is submitted, applicants must include letters from adjacent property owners and/or from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association stating the association approves of the addition. E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow, wetland, etc), a hazard study must be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard report prior,to the issuance of a building permit. Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Planner prior to DRB application to determine the relationship of the property to all mapped hazards. F. For all residential construction: a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the inside face of the exterior structural walls of the building; and b. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a four foot distance from the exterior face of the building walls or supporting columns. G. If DRB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be resolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit. 2 LIST OF MATERIALS NAME OF PROJECT- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The following information is required for submittal to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails x jkv"e IMuCC� Flues Pxcsl-In.) Tri iy Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer: Phone: PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size* PROPOSED TREES EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED *Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous trees. Minimum height for coniferous trees is 6 feet. 7 PLANT MATERIALt Botanical Name Common Ae Quantity Size* PROPOSED SHRUBS EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED *Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is 5 gallon. Type Square Footage GROUND COVERS 41ift SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting plan on the list below and provide the wattage, height above grade and type of light proposed. D. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining walls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback is 3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property is 6 feet. The Mountain Haus, according to the condominium map thereof, recorded December 21; 1970 in Book 219 at page 363 and as defined in condominium declaration recorded January 15, 1971 in Book 219 at page 532, and amendment to said declaration recorded November 22, 1978 in Book 278 at page 816, and rerecorded August 7, 1987 in Book 467 at page 485 and first supplement to first amendment to condominium declaration recorded Angust 28, 1987 in book 468 at page 761, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. r CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR f THE MOUNTAIN HAUS (A Condominium) Recorded 1-15-71 in Book '219 at page 532, as Amended KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: iI ` I THAT WHEREAS, Mountain haus Development Co. , a Colorado .Corporation, hereinafter called "Declarant", is the owner of to real property situate in the County of E.ogle, State of Colo: ado, !which property is described on the attached Exhibit "A", which by 'this reference is made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish a condominium complex under the Condominium Ownership Act of the State of :Colorado; and WHEREAS, Declarant has executed plans for the construc- tion of a building, which building and other improvements tc be constructed will consist of seventy-five separately designated condominium units; and WHEREAS, Declarant does hereby establish a plan for the ownership in fee simple of real property estates consisting of the area or space contained in each of the air space units in the building improvements and the co -ownership by the individual and 'separate owners thereof, as. tenants in common, of all the remaining property, which property is hereinafter defined and referred to as the general common elements; NOW TIiEREFORE, Declarant does hereby publish and declare that the following terms, covenants, conditions, easements, restrictions, uses, liiiiitations and obligations shall be deemed to run with the land, shall be a burden and a benef it to Declarant, its'successors and assigns and any person acquiring or owning an interest in the real property and improvements, their grantees,, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, devisees or assigns, 1. nef initions, unless the context shall expressly provide otherwise. (a) "Unit" means an individual air space unl t which is contained within the perimeter walls, floors, ceilings, windows and doors of: such unit in the building as shown on the Condominium Map to be filed for record, together with all fixtures and improvements therein contained but not including any of 'the structural components of the building located in such unit. (b) "Condominium Unit means the fee simple interest and- title in and to a unit, together with the undivided interest in the general common elements -appurtenant to such -unit and all other rights and burdens created by this Declaration." (c) "Owner" means a person, f irm, corporation, partnership, association or other legal entity, or any canbination thereof, who owns one or more condominium units. (d) "General Common Elements" means and includes: 0 a or as a restaurant or for any other ].awful use, so long as 6ny additional use shall not interfere with the condominium method of ownership of the Mountain Haus Condominium Project. 12. Easements for Encroachments. 'In the event that any portion of the general common elements encroaches upon a unit or units or in the event that any portion of a unit encroaches upon any other. unit or units or upon any portion of the general common elements or in the event encroachment shall occur in the future as a result of settling of the building; or alteration or repair Of the general common elements; or repair or restoration of the building or units after damage by fire or other casualty or condemnation or eminent domain shall exist for the encroachment andceemaintenance oflid heesame eso long as the building stands or the encroachment exists. In the event that any one or more of the units or the building or other improvements comprising part of the general common elements are partially or totally destroyed and are then rebuilt and recon- structed in substantially the same location and as a result of such rebuilding any portion thereof shall encroach as rovided in the preceding sentence, a valid easement for such encroachment shall s hall exist. Such encroachment and easeme nt shall not be considered or determined to be encumbrances on either the general common elements or on the units for purposes of marketability of title or other purposes. In interpreting any and all provisions, Of the Declaration, subsequent unit deeds and mortgages to the units, the actual location of the units shall be deemed con- clusively to be the property intended to be cor_veyed, reserved or encumbered notwithstanding any minor deviations, either horizon- tally or vertically from the location indicated on the minium Map, Condo - 13. Termination of Mechanic's Lien Ri hts and Indemni- f ication, Subsequent to the completion of the improvements described on the Map, no labor performed or materials furnished and incorporated in a unit with the consent or at the request of the uni owner or his agent or his contractor or subscontractor shall be the basis for filing of a lien against the unit of any Other unit owner not expressly consenting to or requesting the same, or against the general common elements. Each owner shall indemnify and hold harmless each of the other owners from and against all liability arising from the claim of any lien against the unit of any other owner or against the general common elements for construction performed or for labor, materials, services or other products incorporated in the owner's suci� onwer's request. unit at The provisions herein contained are subject to the rights of the Managing Agent or Board of Managers of the Association -as is set forth in paragraph 15, 14, Administration and Mana ement, The administration and management of this condominium property shall be governed by the Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws Of* Mountain Maus Condominium Association, a Colorado non -prof it corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Association", ' condominium unit, of upon becoming such an owner, shall benarmember of the Association and shall remain a member for the period of his ownership. There shall be recorded from time to time a certificate of identity of the persons then comprising the management body (Managers and Officers) together with identity of the Managing Agent, if any. Such certificate shall be conclusive evidence thereof in favor of any person relying thereon in good faith. The first such certificate shall be recorded on or -before December 1, 1971. The Association shall be necessar to granted all of the powers Y govern, manage, maintain, repair, administer and -6- regulate the project as a condominium and perform all of the duties required of it. Further, the Association shall be granted and is authorized to act as a the agent on behalf of those owners who desire the Association to assist them in the rental of their condominium units. In furtherance of this authorization and power, the Association is hereby granted the right to use certain portions of the general common elements of the project, as necessary to assist it in the, performance of its duties, including, but not limited to the right to establish on the general common elements, a front desk, office and reservation center. Notwithstanding the above, unless at least 75% of the first mortgagees of condominium units (based upon one vote for each f irst mortgage owned or held) have given their prior written approval, the Association -shall not be empowered or entitled to: (1) By act or auission, seek to abandon or terminate the condominium regime; (2) Partition or subdivide any condominium unit; (3) By act or omission seek to absndon, partition, subdivide, encumber, sell or transfer, the general common elements; (4) Use hazard insurance proceeds fo r lo:,s to improvements for other than repair, replacement or reconstruction of such improvements. The Association shall grant to each first mortgagee of a condo- minium unit, the right to examine the books and records of the condominium project at any reasonable time. Further, the Association shall notify each first mortgagee of any condominium unit of any proposed amendment to the Association's Articles of Incorporation or By -Laws or any change in the Association's Management Agent at least ten days prior to the effective date of such amendment -or change. 15. Reservation for Access - Maintenance Renair and Emergencies. The owners sha11have the irrevoca le right, to be exercised by the Managing Agent or Board of Managers of the Association, to have access to each unit from time to time during reasonable hours as may be necessary for the maintenance, repair or replacement of any of the general common elements therein or accessible therefrom, or, for making emergency repairs therein necessary to prevent damage to the general common elements or to another unit or units. Damage to the interior or any part of a unit or units resulting from the maintenance, repair, emergency repair or replacement of any of the general common elements or as a result Of emergency repairs within another unit at the instance of the Association shall be. a common expense of all the owners; pro- vided, however, that if such damage is the result of the negli- gence of a unit owner, then such unit owner shall be responsible for all of such damage. Restoration of the damaged improvemei,ts shall be substantially the same as the condition of such improve- ments prior to the damage. 16. Owners' Maintenance Respons ibi.li ty of Unit. For purposes of maintenance, repair, alteration and remodeling, an owner shall be deemed to own the interior non -supporting walls, the materials (such as but not limited to plaster., gypsum dr wall, paneling, wall.pape1:, paint, wall. and floor tile, and flooring, but not including the sub -flooring) making up the f inished surfaces of the perimeter %.,alls, ceilings and floors -7- O z p D = (7 O Om z n _ D D n z C7 OD r O m z r D C7 — - i Z O p O z m () D H n -1 C) O D r O z 0 m D m (7 -i D O r D C7 = m C) O Z m O r O m m CO N G) z n D m m r m O m � m m O m O T m O � m n -1 Tr" T � n 0 D r O m 3 m Z ? m� L7 m a _� O m* K <- - Z K <->K m O z C7 f...rD Z Z Z Z C D Z D D ro CU 7 0 < m O z� Z O O O O nm Z O ui O C F-370 C1 n a iv O m O r r- m y T D D T O T D x n < Z H C) (n T << N T H m m m H C D X Z << (D 0' Ai O _� '� D I D C Z N v Z Z O C=70 < C C Ctl ro C CL c.l< 0 g r r r m r- -j r= HCz N v �C O y C CL c m m M I m ZO :1)m cn o 0 Z Z u' Cron td CH'' 2.95Ca(a m a �* O (D JC C7 � m � T O D H O mo Lm) '0 Lm) = m K L7 D �d i. n w H a) C Z O w t4 I Z D 0C) H :d >- ^� DC � W DC I Z O > N O m ai O D O %o O DC DC O 0 (min p Z = < n H -0 Z -0 H C/) c Z -i v - ui D C a H A < WCD c� o 0 7 ( 2 0' --1 O = _ X m o> �a-W CL c ➢ 0 0 - Cl m In N z PL) 7 73(c- x N In CL - O iu ty 9C o O O D N' 5 D)�. Z CD(D 0 W td p r'd O c C7 C 0 0 m K m ❑ ❑ 11 ;�m m --Im r -n m C F _ 1 0 m z � Z O C7 0 O D D m r INS � LJ ❑ ❑ H t� T1 -v O r m z 9 d O m D z z C mm > D O m 0< O 1 O m � { m N ymw�o O z c Tr" i 0 (Z/) r_ v m 9z 0 v �m < � Z CD (n (D (-D L7 M a _� O � - Z ... C7 f...rD Ci �_ (D Z OT C D -0 O D T ro CU 7 0 < m z� Z ri O nm Z O F-370 C1 n a iv m O r r- m i D O x n < Z H C) (n O >> m X Z << (D 0' Ai O _� '� 0 < Z v O C=70 < C C Ctl ro C CL c.l< 0 g c m HCz N v �C O y C CL c m m I ZO cn o 0 Z Z Cron td CH'' 2.95Ca(a m D �* O (D JC C7 Z T O D O mo '0 LTJ = m K D �d i. n w H a) C Z O w I Z D 0C) :d >- ^� DC O0 6,0— DC I Z 0 > N m ai n D D m = C7 d m = Go _a CDD W 7 < w DC DC O 0 (min p Z = < CD n O Z)?� Z c Z -i v - ui D C a H A < WCD c� o 0 7 ( 2 0' --1 < r- X m o> �a-W CL c ➢ 0 0 - Cl m z PL) 7 73(c- x CL - O iu 9C o O D N' 5 D)�. Z CD(D 0 td p r'd O c C7 C 0 0 m K m m T co VALUATION CJ 9 Z 9Z r Z H O > I I 7 m m N C7 n C m D z C > O O� Cil Zz D Cr7 Z D � Z m = p m C me g 0 of O v) v x x I z z = Z = o O� 7 0 p p_ m �) 0) a co C)c 3 T H O TI ^' T D m < O C7 G7 n m C7 0 T D Z co Z v; — _ ZO 0 (D d _ Z _ NIC" A� m D r rD Z X n Z O D G7 N 7mpOT0`<n''�ZD �r tr1 n O T mD0 %CD 0 G) oa�, O �� mm�d m m W 0� H LTJ I m�C1 H (n 0a�1 I O N W M m �-d 1-d m 0 �<_°� Awa.0o Hy I~ m N A 0 7 C ao oo N O N l0 ul m LT _ @' 0) I r--� 0 H N O v In .. (D O n a— H 0� D) I `N° mI O CD C O ? m ((Dn in' :3 � m _ CD (n N 0 - ,. - 7 (D n U m CLCL- 1 E O N CD H �. n T a cl Mm N z O m n O 0 O m m O co m 7K m v O Z C— O CO L7 m 0, O �- > m O zJ Om -i n .� > D Z 0 O> r O� -� C DC O� Or Z m � D� OD r O m Dm O� M > n = -1 m n -� p z Z m ` � z > K m O r- vmi C) n rD- _ r T -4 m -4 T1 m m M o 1 m I T AI• DI Zm7 � -4 m p 0 m v A � - n (zn mz o n m mz m Om �N r mz -+ mz °z z { \ � C) rt3 I I z 1 F- n > _ c O _ O T Co O T 0 Td m '� 0 r, O n: p CJ A — � m -, F > > > D r- r -� 'c O VA AT N O m m m m m m m M �� =m m 0 r o z z Z Q G] czi p > Q Q 0 O C z z m Z m m r ca iJ 37 —I n — Z Z < (a O m o cl) CD CJ r m 7 O - ,< C-) 'oa Cy 'DA a a) 7 (9 a) O A H C: a C CJ CL O N CD co J ^ �- O w r 7 .» > Qn Oo - ^ ' C r a7 7 CL 7 p �^ - B m Cj to �n n p 7 C tlllll//00co mya ✓A a7 a) CD S y o°^.. a) Z (D q A oz Via: m e \— f Aom 7 � m 0) - N z0 3 ^m m o 7 O / CI - 0 O y a — n(` ��a �� o z am a7 Co m m v �• 0 0 � O m7 3 m E A 7 A G^ T CD O0 a o O CD N N > .M cD 0 ¢ A CO CD Vf O N N C C m f� 6) A (D T 7 (D _ a v i i Iz z r > Z -a7 m I m o m 0{ ox o T m O O r�1 z > r � yr I o m � 7 I O> O N -+ cn z m m 0 m Z Ol -a O r mz mzQ P. > z> -1 m (� m > I n > M o Cz p I T AI• DI Zm7 � z n A 0 m v � { n (zn p o n m -� Om �N r cn -+ D O °z z m m \ � rt3 I I 1 F- n > _ c O _ N Co Td m '� r, O rn CJ A — � m I I C r > O z v m A X z N ti r C m z m �O m _ r �z m c > 74 z m O z z c>) r o o. m m O n O z m -+ > N r O z C z m a M. m r r r CD 0 z C) _0 > z > C C3 z O m (� m > Zr n m x C O O m n > M o m o m z n A � { n (zn ciJ�❑ { V m C O z -0 m --i T m m N rw ru �J t C --1 z O m z m O n { n > M o o m z n A � { n (zn o z cn -+ D O °z z m m 0 1 F- n > _ c O _ N Co Td m '� r, O CJ A — � m -i r -� 'c O VA AT N O m O C m m M �� =m ; 0 r o z z Z n G] czi > C- 0 O m m m t C --1 z O lows of voi 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479 -?),39 office of community development BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer"s (Public Works) review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as long as three weeks. All commercial (:large or small) and all multi -family permits will have to follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with. regard to necessary review, these projects may also take the three week period. Every attempt wi.11 be made by this department to expedite this permit as. soon as possible. I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. ic-z Agreed to by. C LZ -h c - Pro 'e t Name Date Work Sheet was turned into the Community Development Department. 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-21.38 or 479-2139 office of community development TO: ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL FROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MARCH 16, 1988 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE In summary, Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or material, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public place or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on all Town of Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft. off pavement. This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail Public Works Department. Persons found violating this ordinance will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material. In the event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the 24 hour time specified, the Public Works Department will remove said material at the expense of person notified. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be applicable to construction, maintenance or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities in the right -a -way. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town of Vail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Re %and a owl dged b Position Relationship to Project --f ?�— /I-R� ��- Date (i.e. contractor, owner) � -:1:13 1 9 4 9 410' :'9.'15'9 O'S: Ifonroe &Oew(, Town of Vail Community Development Plan BUI Health Film Approved 0 13 Oc',�ed 0 Validity of Permit rmit Sec. 303 (c) 19 U.B.C. FAGiE Ca -T Ae� or Qmritirin of 1 of.,Tmit or approval of plans and shall ncil oil.>'-,,'T&ssd to be a permit for, or an (-,t ainy-of tle provisions of this code r --;.r crdinafic�i ;ff 'ino jurisdication. The issuance of a• P;ans, r,-.-Iecificaf ions and other data shall t ter; train thereafter requiring the cGe.r -�';Uloin of error:; ja said plans, specifications and othe, data." r4, -4r Ire— MeAA d' Condominium Unit , The Mountain Haus, according to the condominium map thereof, recorded December 21, 1970 in Book 219 at page 363 and as defined in condominium declaration recorded January 15, 1971 in Book 219 at page 532, and amendment to said declaration recorded November 22, 1978 in Book 278 at page 816, and rerecorded August 7, 1987 in Book 467 at page 485 and first supplement to first amendment to condominium declaration recorded August 28, 1987 in book 468 at page 761, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. .4150 a 5 w�i . tfiu,�,cn C Cj Vj o vo 1 , C() 2' w� ? r N pp 0oo _ r u o r �, These are painted paper reproductions matched to concrete lab standards made by mixing WS Type I - II gray cement, light tan sand, the Davis pigments below and water for a 4" slump. In e r Actual concrete color can differfrom these samples or develop random light or dark areas swz 5'tdue to differences in water content, finishing and curing methods, and weather conditions. ODifferences in concrete raw materials will also cause variation.Mostvariationsareslightand enhance concrete's natural appeal. Other variations can be unsightly or lead to premature ui wear. More information on back. W U J ¢ Color Standards for Quantities below indicatethe weight of pigmentto mix L W Z ° the Concrete Industry with each 94 Ib. sack of cement. W N 0 2 a SUNSET ROSE OMAHA TAN CLIFFSIDE BROWN SAN DIEGO BUFF MIAMI BUFF 1 LB. 160 1 I.B. 5084 21/2 LBS. 6804 11/2 LBS. 5237 1 LB. 5447 BAJA RED HARVEST GOLDENROD LAKESIDE BROWN SEQUOIA SAND ESA BUFF1`pfi' 2 LBS. 160 2 LBS. 5084 5 LBS. 6804 1 LB. 641 2 LBS. 5447 6 1 �- BRICK RED SPANISH GOLD PUEBLO BROWN YOSEMITE BROWN LIGHT GRAY 4 LBS. 160 3 LBS. 5084 21/2 LBS. 61078 2 LBS. 641 1/2 LB. 8084 or 21/2 LBS. 860 TILE RED WESTERN GOLD- FLAGSTONE BROWN DARK GRAY 3 LBS. 1117 1'/2 LBS. 5844 5 L . 3 LBS. 641 1 LB. 8084 or 5 LBS. 860 • PLM ��2 LBSU1395 01$ 4 LBS. 1395 4112 LBSP677 ��4 LBS. 677 1112 LBS. 8084 or 71h LBS. 860 II it lows of Vol 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUEST Bldg. Permit #�� office of community development Date Applicant Company: �h Applicant Phone: Y/"%` 01 �.-2 s--�2 - % S-C/,Y Company Representative: ! 2C.��w Name Position Specific Request and Rationale Fe-�� o -L 6L-&-� Requested Date(s) Mmes: c a-? SZS�,� Applicant Signature: r *Please return completed form to the Building Department. Town of Vail Approvals: Community Development: Police Department: Fire Department: Public Works: Date: I {{.. ; w�: i a+ :y t r °'yt ak: ;"fi" Vyry�s r" ; n .—:ter INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT '� TOW OF VAIL DATE E / JOB NAME CALLER READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM LOCATION: ` � _ BUILDING: PLUMBING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ UNDERGROUND ❑ FOUNDATION / STEEL ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. ❑ FRAMING ❑ ROUGH / WATER ❑ ROOF & SHEER ❑ GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING ❑ INSULATION ❑ POOL / H. TUB ❑ SHEETROCK NAIL ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 FINAL ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: ❑ TEMP. POWER ❑ HEATING ❑ ROUGH ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ CONDUIT ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ ❑ ❑ FI . N A/L ❑ FINAL ROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: DATE v INSPECTOR P N SHoa CO WIADO DEPART MI•:NT OFAHEALTH 4210 East 11th Avenue Telefax Numbers: Mein Building/Denver (303) 922.8074 Ptarmiman Place/Denver: (303) 320-1629 • qp� ryyz ROY ROMER Denver, Colorado 80220.3718 First National Bank Buildin¢/Denti�-..'.� Qovernor Phone (303) 320-8833 7 (343) 366-86159 :..-5-:•� Grand Junction OMce JOEL KOHN (303) 248.7198 4111 = cInterim Executive Director Pueblo OtAee �, ,Y.• .11 (719) 643.8441 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT,PERMIT THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO T112 COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION'S REGULATION NO. 8, ADOPTED FEBRUARY 21, 1491 AND EFFECTIVE APRIL 30, 1991. IT IS ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING ASBESTOS ABATEMENT. AS A CONTRACTOR, YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS, DEPENDING ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY IN WHICH THE WORK IS BEING PERiOIUar). THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT YOU CHECK WITH COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES IN ORDER TO DETERMINE ANY OTHER LOCAL BUILDING/PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE MET. THIS ORIGINAL PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. THIS EMISSION PERMIT IS VALID FROM 04/22/92 THROUGH THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED TO: 81-0553330 SPRAY SYSTEMS ENVTRONMENTAL 1616 S. KMARD THWE, AZ 86281- 06/21/92 FOR THE LOCATION SPECIFIED BELOW: MOUNTAIN ILIUS 292 E. MRADOW DR. VAIL, CO 816,58 - 'EA( LE CpY1N'i'Y THROUGH IFETHESEA SCHEDULED ACTUL DWORK DATES CHANGE, WORR DATES ARE MOT2F'Y2V9T ASBESTOS AWW331-8543 IMMEDIATELY, Project Supervisor: JEFF CROMER GOO --02--5242 COPY MAILED 04/18/92•T0-E*GLE COUN7Y ISSUED BY: RWJ -- - -� _ RECORD * 7457 TITLE: INDUSTRIAL HYGTRNIST PRWTT * 92RA1271A THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO ALL R REGULATIONS OF THE COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE AIR QUALITY CONTROL ACT C.R.S. 1992 & 1989 (25-7-101 and 25-7-501 et aeq) rvmnll. pli ---------------------------------------------------------- .------------------------------- R.ECETPT DATE: 04/13/92 Colorado Dept. of Health PERMIT Al:92EA1271A AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION AMOUNT: $275 4210 E. 11th Avenue CHECK #: 1553 Denver, CO 80220 RECORD #l: 7457 i' For: MOUNTAIN HAUS 292 E. MEADOW DR. VAIL, CO 818&8 - Received frame SPRAY SYST m MWIRONMENTAL 1616 S. RDWARD nWE, AZ 85281 -- Received by: _ O O x n m � O zz m 2 n Z H O D r ZZ X C n co -� Z O O OZ m x n C) m -I C7 O D r O m � Z n X --I D O r D n = m O m W Z K m p N 0 D r m r r O w�0-,< oa0aW VALUATION O O O 3� x m y CD CS'O w O � 0 aC`< 0 O Oaf c m r _ Z m � 0 cn CD CD L-) K D m 0 3 m m O TO m O ;o m m O m m m O m { _ m { _ m J Z OD m Z Z "i Z m m x frfl Z V z Z z m Z Hm D o Z O D 07 r97 O L7 O z � O m O O D w O 7d to O Ln 4- O Z O 7y r p x C o � In w 0 CD D 71 o -nO m r CD T N m I0 v m O m O > OX x �4 O < <n m O < 00 < C rn< by I ON < C H n m Z H m O C-- bZ D D D N C v CJS O O m N r N00 tM�1 r O Cn O < � O cn � m m r4 z N C=7 H zx D W D hj C\ m H O m ' ld m H H m 4--0 G) O I 00 0 t"'' 00 � r C) N N W D N n:E W _ m 0 Ili Z O In 0 M K M Cn O C~ �d D ul In O �� to N t.n x 00 to z O O z O -j v z O cn x z O t' M z O r I Z D O Z D o O O M.. O N �C DC JC z O m o O o cn cn O o b H v O v LTJ o H D z C z < w H Z H DIS mlro y CCi) m D H H m i--' UD t7 m CD Q` w O In D I O O Ito m O z 1 W � CD } � tz)O •� b G7 t7 tri O r MEMO m O T m x n r rrJ w - w0.'co0� x z CD CD(nCD'0 CD mr �d w�0-,< oa0aW VALUATION O O O 3� x m y CD CS'O w O � 0 aC`< 0 O Oaf c m r _ Z m � 0 cn CD CD r m 1 (n CD C � \G, S - ZT C w w °-° CD w . j O C p. O n d CD C7 C., 3 w VT J 76 o0wwCL C Ca x ;v • # xa0� 'C3 , D j c0 (n• EL- w w Cn O O •� w D cn Z N C7 3 =r S CD cp � 0 -� w �D T o O O m 0 mC J n n Z P OD r >>oo� "i W m m x ;\ aCL CD 0 O cn � �c V z o Oxy.°c z m z Hm CD 0 o Z O --j a 07 r97 -n 9 C7I O H a = O z � c n) CD a a m O <' O D CD �. CL O -Oi �r _. �• o w �. 3 D O C -)w O O 7y r mO(Do.o. m O r�iJ cn cn :3x O In w 0 CD D aa�-0 o CD C: p N N m r CD T Z xm"Ya MEMO m O T m x rn N O � n v n m D -n i --iZ < O C) V) ;a� O C C7 O z 9 Op O c H x mr Z VALUATION m y m � 0 m 0< O x r _ Z m � � r m r� D z H { mm m Z t- H H G) L� C37 Z Z D 1:1 O m m OT , D O Cn m x D 3 � H T H O C�7 Cn T C Z r c "i D 0 r D x i V z z c� D m z Hm 2 z O Z O O 07 r97 -n 9 C7I r, o � z z z m_ O D r 0 T v �r r D O O O 7y r D r�iJ cn O -n C D o r m Z z I0 H C7 CA m ZN v <n m O I + � by I m O H n m 31 m D n bZ 0IO D N C v CJS O m o� C cn p Z tM�1 O Cn O < cn � r4 z N zx m ~ MO O m p n 4--0 b I Hm z N C) N N W D N n:E W _ m 0 Ili Z In In 0 M K a Cn O CD D ul In O �� N t.n m to O ul -j v � O I Z D O Z D o O O M.. O N �C DC JC DC I z O m o O o cn cn O o O o o O D z C z < w H Z H DIS mlro y CCi) m D H m i--' m CD D O O O Ito m O z 1 W rn N O � n v n m D -n i --iZ < O C) V) ;a� O C C7 O z 9 Op O c H x mr VALUATION rd z � d In - Z Cn r I C7 Z x 0 9 I I O -1 Lam] 9 -a cn m r- m m 0 m C7 m n C r m r� D z C r m co t- H H G) L� C37 Z Z D 1:1 O D r t f -A , D Z O Z m x D 3 � C7 C7 H O m n C m m n r C) Z w v' C) I t OI Cn C x x C > z z c� D m z H 2 z 3 z 2 O z 07 r97 -n 9 C7I m o o v m_ O D r 0 T v r D O O O 7y r NIL 7 trj r�iJ m r ZD t-' D I P H C7 CA m I m � x bZ 0IO m p o� C cn I I tM�1 � t7 ~ b I N N N N W m m N W _ In Ili In In N In Cn O In ul In O N t.n m to O ul -j O O o O O 0 o O o cn o O o o O o m � m x H DIS mlro H m i--' Ito � } � •� D Z m -j m H I z o n z 0 9 � O G� m m � H O m m m O Z C- 0 co T) m --i m m Z O tom" z Cn H � z c r � o -0 IH LOX NNW ■ N IT! O T .v M m D Z 4 O m m 0 O O m m m C m 7 m G � y m > r 1 O m 0< 0 rn x � r Z r m O `E m m m A 0 c O '4 T m Om f 0 r= rr- m m j < r -0m y Z O O -i > N > a = m O 0'D M 1 (D Z D I 0 T r Oi 0 0 Q r 2 m m 'i C7 �� cb/�A A n 0 a A a ID O A T O r rm- m cn . p C- . G7 in 0030m� n O .0 O C mQS Oto C --4< N � z 0 A CL _.K A ai c m m m ?C G7 , r o "r O Z O Z ,a CD m m O �, > o o O 0- O y O n ; p m > �0a�? CoC 3 w.. 0 m 0 H Z O O I z y 0 l!7 y r d = = C m a CL 3 , mO O zz- m < m m m io 41 D ? < a C • _ < < 1 00 7 a� ? D r N m 00 (A faD aam a r m z _ 0 Z CD� m a�o > _am �S m m O O c z A ; m VALUATION OZ :rW i Z a m tm7 A a m> C m m �> m C O�..m� 7 Q G)I ZI a > 2 m=;= O m r m c ` 0 7 9O I� C>Z O f m =Z m O :6 �3� C r 1 = m >> - r� ; d mm� m OqQ i 0 0 0S?.0c Q !;--r OI -M., m '. m :r 0 � I N m I s .�a�ac v' ( 0C7 ate' Z ma.�rao N N INV7 m m G o 0 I A>�5.3 m m ( 4 (? am0�ac , 0 � m (A a w m A r>�n CD as°D 0 H co N y �. M .A. a I m D Z 4 O m m 0 O O m m m C m 7 m G � VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT / TOWN OF VAIL ispection Report / Correction Notice NAME OF BUSINESS ILDING NAME DATEBUSIN NE OCCUPANCY MAILING ADDRESS 1 AMEo� OWNER/MANAGER PHONE FOR EME G QQ - v1rc� �- \G pn ��1✓ c` .r.d0 Ki VV 14 7 PIRYSICALADDRESS- 19. PROPER STORAGE OF ASHES 2ND CONTACT NAME PHONE ©' GENERAL YES NO N/A oxen �,�� STORAGE YES NO N/A 1. ROOF OPENINGS \G pn ��1✓ c` ,-- .4 1 fK��ryy�S�C: ' V\ t c' S +�"'�n� •- e �vl'L u 19. PROPER STORAGE OF ASHES c 2 EXITS PROVIDED AND IN ORDER 20. PROPER STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS 3. STAIRWAYS PROVIDED AND IN ORDER 21. PROPER STORAGE OF 1-IAZMDOUS MATERIALS 4. EXTINGUISHERS IN ORDER Dale 22. MSDS OF MATERIALS 5. ALARM SYSTEM HEATING DEVICES YES No I N/A 6. KITCHEN HOODS AND DUCTS ✓ Date ? 23. PROPER STORAGE (boiler room) 7. KITCHEN EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM v Date 1 - 24. PROPER STORAGE (elevator control) L� 8. ELEVATORS 25. PROPER MAINTENANCE OF APPLIANCES 9. SPRINKLER SYSTEM Wet Dry MAIN UTILITY SHUT -OFFS YES NO N/A 10. STANDPIPE Wet Dry 26. ELECTRICAL PANEL ACCESSIBILTY 11. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS 27. GAS SHUT-OFF ACCESSIBILITY 12. EMERGENCY LIGHTING (/ 28. WATER SHUT-OFF ACCESSIBILITY 13. KNOXBOX-Keys REFERRALS YES N/A 14. PROPER EXTENSION CORDS f/' 29. BUILDING INSPECTOR 15. ELECTRICAL BREAKERS LABELED 30. MECI IANICAL INSPECTOR 16. OTHER 31. ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR 17. OTHER 18. OTT IER DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: ef-7r/ 1S V �- (-_ I -L , 1 FA, "r, Af ec, ,,tk;j T'y' oxen �,�� f�� -I� �� 1C�R" �F;Pc�. ��C to zoZ %�cn(Y��QVZcnCP o�rE Svp1��F \G pn ��1✓ c` ,-- .4 1 fK��ryy�S�C: ' V\ t c' S +�"'�n� •- e �vl'L u _I 14, 4 �ti4 �, �r.ov r� TI`- i u 1 1 vac K, + L\v\ CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY: l 1 �--)(-(A.M)P.M. Date: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE 15.02 IF YOU FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THIS CORRECTION NOTICE ON OR BEFORE THE ABOVE STATEIP. COMPLETION DATE, YOUR FAILURE MAY RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION BEING TAKEN UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE U.F.C.�_EDITION, WHICH MAY INCLUDE YOUR BEING ISSUED A SUMMONS TO APPEAR IN MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY COURT FOR THE VIOLATIONS ABOVE SPECIFIED. UPON A FINDING OF GUILTY OF SAID VIOLATIONS, YOU WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PENALTIES PROVIDED BY LAW. BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER: NAME (please print) �_ 1 (J Ii, NAME ()please pri ) ... 0 -11,1�7wl INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER O�<FF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL DATE O` t Z _ JOB NAME CALLER READY FOR INSPECTION: MON 6a� WED THUR FRI C AMl PM LOCATION: BUILDING: PLUMBING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ UNDERGROUND ❑ FOUNDATION / STEEL ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. ❑ FRAMING ❑ ROUGH / WATER ❑ ROOF & SHEER PLYWOOD NAILING ❑ GAS PIPING ❑ INSULATION ❑ POOL / H. TUB ❑ SHEETROCK NAIL ❑ O FINAL ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: ❑ TEMP. POWER ❑ ROUGH _ ❑ CONDUIT ❑ FINAL MECHANICAL: ❑ HEATING ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ FINAL APPROVED 13 DISAPPROVED ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: DATE ��INSPECTOR 9W -SHOP INSPECTION REQUEST t PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL DATE 2 JOB NAME CALLER .r READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PM LOCATION: BUILDING: PLUMBING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ UNDERGROUND FOUNDATION / STEEL ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. ❑ FRAMING ❑ ROUGH / WATER El ROOF & SHEER ❑GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING ❑ INSULATION ❑ POOL/ H. TUB ❑ SHEETROCK NAIL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ FINAL ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: ❑ TEMP. POWER ❑ HEATING ❑ ROUGH ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ CONDUIT ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ ❑ ` FINAL ❑ FINAL APPROVED CORRECTIONS: ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE %a ' fe0 %/ INSPECTOR ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED -c,-t;� PRMPSHOP INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT NUMBEIR OF PROJECT TOVYN qF VAIL DATEzllq JOB NAME CALLER READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES��] WED /jTHUR FR/I LOCATION: AM PM { BUILDING: PLUMBING: ❑ FOOTINGS / STEEL ❑ UNDERGROUND ❑ FOUNDATION / STEEL ❑ ROUGH / D.W.V. _ ❑ FRAMING ❑ ROUGH / WATER ❑ ROOF & SHEER ❑ GAS PIPING PLYWOOD NAILING ❑ INSULATION ❑ POOL / H. TUB ❑ SHEETROCK NAL ❑ ❑ ❑ FINAL K oe— ❑ FINAL ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: ❑ TEMP.' POWER ❑ HEATING ❑ ROUGH ❑ EXHAUST HOODS ❑ CONDUIT ❑ SUPPLY AIR ❑ FINAL ❑ FINAL i APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: DATE �/� — — �%� INSPECTOR PIMTSHo 'NAL INSPECTION'S COMPLETED The items below need to be complete before giving a permit a final C of 0. Please check off in the box provided. FINAL PLUMBING DATE: FINAL MECHANICAL DATE: IMPROVEMENT SURVEY RESID. NAME: DATE: FINAL ELECTRICAL a DATE: \V —'�" \\ FINAL BUILDING EAST SIDE: WEST SIDE: DATE: — I ST —9 Z TEMPORARY C OF 0 DATE: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DATE: LANDSCAPING DUE DATE: FILE NAME:�� n OO -1 D = m O n O m H C) z D D Z C7 O D n Z� -- C D coF) z O O zrr- -� m n D H -A C) O D C) ZO H M D m Xm � D O r (� = 00 z m CO z > m O m N G) (7 D m H „ m 00 „ m O D U) O Z � � m �' � �_ m m m 0 { n i O Z O z D m H LTl m xv�D m : Z Z � - m O m� >7 D n m * Hpr D Om m D K a Z Z m Z Z O Z Z 9 H� O c C D D m m O z< O O p n �z cn -_+ O V O C o H D (_ _' N Cl m v < 7� m 9 H A m x til ati til C n o v> CD (D D 0 m D D p D d T N r N �dt9-O 3(`D°� V I` z M 33 K --iD ccn H;o z� C Cil 0 O W c tl 7 r O p z D - M DC m O D O cn N H _ m m 0 0 O G) G) I'D G) t-1 < td w :r - N Z 0o U)O 73 O H (o N W c�D O O O O Oo D O a < o n p7 Cl CD Z � D Cl) D < N til M A� LI) a� n a FHHd�yy Z = = O cn O O 3 H H CD O m p Z z H N CD � (o N r� H CL ON �" n v O O .' '' -0 PU n v= m C: H O Z N t7 Z ri VALUATION =m Z G) m CD C a z C n m o v m '� m H' H m r- r c w� D O H (D H H 'zi trJ O Z H G) Z O I z I� cn > m � Z N w n = O m D z C 0 2 H a 0 0 -. 0 7 m e � o>> LTJ O CrJ P6 tr1 00 > D L) H p I n I r- D x C z A > D z m z v o 2 0 z 0 n 2 C K m 0 r ❑�LW m co --1 mmc F _O m D D m r 1:1 El � T � N O C z p W_ 9 D z O O G7 z t7 Pd r a e C= m C= O �O' r n 3 n O 7 7 :r• L Q <D m ^C 3 O Z O N 7 0 < r rn O T m Cl) D 2 -i m m T z o m m > D � o Om 00 x O z m L7 O >0 N It Mm �� A O M CD w D U) O Z � � m �' � �_ m 0 r- m 0 { to On S y i O Z O z H LTl m xv�D 9n { z �aim3m Z CD cD Z Z � - m O D >7 D n Hpr D Om O N 7 0 < r Z m L7 0 �� A O ro '0 Cl n a m m 0 r- � C-- 9n { z - H O m n O 3= >7 D n D Z td O 0 O p a m O 9 H� O c C CD W O CL C.,< c m z CD (D 0 m z T O p T �dt9-O 3(`D°� V I` z M 33 K --iD ccn H;o z� C Cil 0 O W c tl 7 r O p z D - JC DC OOH c 3 w DC DC z O Cl) cn con m p v _ m m a w cD v < O Z N < td w :r - 0o U)O 73 O H (o N W c�D Z Oo D a < o n p7 Cl CD Z D Cl) D < N til M A� LI) a� n a i n O O 3 H H CD O m p Z z H N CD � (o H CL v O O .' '' -0 PU n v= m C: H VALUATION =m Z G) m CD C a z C n m o v m v m H m r- r c w� D O H (D H H 'zi trJ O Z H G) Z O I z I� 4 D m � Z N n m n = C m D z C 0 2 H a 0 0 -. 0 7 m e � o>> LTJ O CrJ P6 tr1 00 > D L) H p I n I r- D x C z A > D z m z v o 2 0 z 0 n 2 C K m 0 r 033 >> p o d m Z d m T l x rrt o o D c) > 0 , y Z co - z vi 3 H C z m Fm r r c) M moZwCL (D `< Z 7y 0 0 D)r K_ p� m D r cZi 3J �( > LTJ roto 'JJ' - D r �� I -� N m O m p��°� z �� 9 7u O z I H „ m x Er- _ CD b H> a cn m m :3 0 o � r- Ix x �a=< 3 m - 0 I N (DD Q a S C H x ro cn 17� H -� 00 , :3 W CD z t9 7d C�7 I T 2 w a O •0 3 H M x n H H m m 'O cn, a -C O H I I Cn 0 0-= C t-' H F C t9 I v O N In 3 O' 7 (D w C) 00 O O voc In co n m (D O C) O O' tnrJ Z C, Z o o >I ol O O mI �C O O 0.1 n 2(D m m w H mI I I N a � N m c O cn (n (D w Cr1 Com-' t H H PP1 LT] I I v - m ni :3 CD a nIn �� / Hod I z N T N M �o H r O CO m x m v O z C- 0 CO Cf) m cn D O O m Z D m O Om Z 2 D D Z_ O n D O� Z C D W O C) �.M m Z m D O D O D Z m C7 D m O D n O— * Z O CD D m p r m m cn I) r p m m m --4 O m -4 O cm D 2 Om a m x r- r _ z m Z ; m Z m m Z I- m n_ G7 p Cl) -+ n ; { O C C) M �J m z < O 3 c z O M Z z ..� > a r - r ... O T O m D 0 � O O z D r � I O z '� O C D ori < D j < D D < D _ CD O O CD < D < D m z m m n < Z A _ O 61 0 0 3 j j m O K m r m D p J m � �. D m cn C m m i Nm m (��ri O m O (D O ui m O O O z f X 3 wv� =r O0) O O D D a)c' _ O m n > 0 > p^� m = . C 0 ? CL 3? m �z o v w CO z r �d m x 7CD . y fD _ C v li D 0. - i fp W 7 i7 7 a 0 4 z D > z � m N. �( r D < 0 00 y N a CD 7 67 r r c m D O ; a - a (D � mm --4 r M m C _�� m Z 22 Z O 0 C) Dr m r � ElD T C C Z r. 0 co 0 Z 00 Z CL 3 _ o_ = 8 3 0 C_ O Z Q CDM OMI C m r► r� m D m Z O IT! C7 O O n IT! O 03 m X m a O Z L O a) T 4 m O > m D 2 Om a m x r- r _ z x m O z m m N I- n_ G7 p Cl) -+ n O > m O C O M m z < O 3 c z O M c ..� > a r - r ... D 0 � (D y CD z D r � I O z '� O C D D O m _ CD O O CD 'o W m z m m n < Z A _ O 61 0 0 3 j j m O K m r m D p O v � �. D C) p cn C m Q C1 O C i Nm (��ri O O (D O ui m O O z f X 3 wv� =r O0) O O D D a)c' _ O m n > 0 > p^� m = . C 0 ? CL 3? m �z o v w CO z r �d m x 7CD . y fD C v li D 0. - < fp W 7 i7 7 a 0 z D > z � m N. �( r D < 0 00 y N a CD 7 67 r r c m D O ; a - a (D � m I z M O fa •+ f/l EL D OO - ^-"o Ma m O M C VALUATION z CD O Ol z z I r m m m C m > C m � D O --1 - CCD o O O L7 D r 2 m x ; z O m n r C m m a� n 7 7 3 7 < a W O� O m X C Z A Z 0 > = n Z o D m 0 z r O �m j y 3 _ C z T m O z m x m = = O n Gzi m� �p�va `Z �Ni� yI O m m r 9 O y> O O O *. 7 2 O D l r- -� "n H 74 Z .. -. p p z m m m x ��mo' -4 I C. N m z n �a— �a.�n�cD m O <. Oj I m in o m ' --3 x Z Q' o co F: -� ( v� o aN CD CCD N N A m I I�V = CDD asOM (�y V O y y cD C• �j m I �macn -� m 1 t .1 r� m D m Z O IT! C7 O O n IT! O 03 m X m a O Z L O a) T 4 m 10WO of voilly 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 office of community development BUILDING PERM1IT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works) review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as long as three weeks. All commercial (large or small) and all multi -family permits will have to follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned departments with regard to necessary review, these projects may also take the three week period. Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible. I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame.. Agreed to by.� �^'l Project Name, Date Work Sheet was turned into the Community Development Department. 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-21.38 or 479-2139 office of community development TO: ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL FROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MARCH 16, 1988 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE In summary, Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debris or material, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, alley or public place or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on all Town of Vail streets and roads is approximately 5 ft. off pavement. This ordinance will be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail Public Works Department. Persons found violating this ordinance will be given a 24 hour written notice to remove said material. In the event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the 24 hour time specified, the Public Works Department will remove said material at the expense of person notified. The provisions of this ordinance shall not be applicable to construction, maintenance or repair projects of any street or alley or any utilities in the right -a -way. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town of Vail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Read and acknowledged by: �1C_> ��n it Ilf 71iYY�lt Y . �c`n�1ctr.��rL Position/Relationship to Project (i.e. contractor, owner) Date State of Colorado DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION General Abatement Certificate Certificate No. :3 zt 3 7 0371 APCO-SSP-A3(4/89) I it lows of voi 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 or 479-2139 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUEST Applicant Company: RYt , Bldg. Permit # �\ 1 office of community development Date Applicant Phone: Company Representative: Name /Position Specific Request and Rationale:3 T� pw•1� a 4r) r1eAj,,.« 0 4- I 701, Requested Dates) /Times: Applicant Signature: *Please return completed form to the Building Department. Town of Vail Approval Community Developmei Police Department: Fire Department: Public Works: ��J v 4-r— Date: Say � - r APPLICATION DATE 4-/ q I (Please -Print or Type NAME OF PROJECT ., "H D U NTAW k ASIS Dr- VAIL". NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING "AHEK, ffiANk C.h." I rzD HAPHONE ADDRESS NAME OF ADDRESS -49-1 PE ""hDW hRZVV..1 VAr-L T1L.Sg SIGNATURE OF OWNER LOCATION OF PROJECT Ar * KouA►rnxiA AA,"' — WEST DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT rnmskL-m f -LAI FARC SorFxr woo IEuzTrA6 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGN/AWNING (FREE STANDING, WALL, PROJECTING, ETC), INCLUDE SIGN MESSAGE. FALKL . SOfFLr U4hF-9- t -tmsi ta1a RhMWEF j AOCA -M EIMSM 6, -V S C. =- KF-CF.I Lu FIzAg5W B. SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL_4J__ %U4BKW_W CMAnllzA6► HARQ FAER7JC_l Or- -4,Z1 "IANraJATED �K�siECi CVS �ABRu" ��W f ') As C. SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO 1L'Gx [F�Ib`r�l *Y t, lou wjwn su"Lgur To A -R" -m FaLw t, sem_ g14a-srmtwm O� D. HEIGHT OF SIGN ABOVE GRADE 0,1 M E. DESCRIBE LIGHTING(EXISTING R PROPOSED) _►�� `� nMOU►JT1�t1� ZUDtr r-"" " RM�i�LC AW+JL CAM A�1 .0 F. LENGTH OF BUSINESS FRONTAGE (FT) -' bV G. CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL .� 'ATTACH' H. $20.00 FEE PAID CHECK $ Oil UQUIRED MhT,ERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION FlSite Plan n_"yr-F,A9b SLLMA&F- 1 • nr�czc�►-rto►1 Z . _,_,_ Elevations.. showing exact location of sign or awning on the building g. Photographs showing proposed location 4. Colored scale drawing 5. Sample of proposed materials labls 91- 6. Photograph of sign i sign Administrator 4 1 4 I rows 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 (303)479-2139 December 6, 1990 Mr. John Mouw Mountain Haus Box 1748 Vail, Colorado 81658 Re: Awning and Signage Dear John: FILE COPY office of community development On December 5, 1990, the Design Review Board gave approval to the design proposed for an awning on the west side of the Mountain Haus. The awning will be of an opaque dark green canvas material with white lettering which states "Mountain Haus" and includes a white snowflake. This would be a replacement to the yellow awning formerly used by the Cantina Cafe. Conditions of approval are: 1. The signage must not exceed 4.7 square feet. 2. The lighting will be removed if the staff finds that it is lighting the awning per your letter of December 5, 1990. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, /19etsyy rRlsolack Planning Technician December 5, 1990 Ms. Betsy Rosolak Department of Community Development Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Dear Betsy: The Mountain Haus Condominium Association is anxious to remove the yellow, transluscent canopy that was put in place by the Corona Cafe because it feels that this awning is totally unacceptable in both color and the manner in which it is illuminated. The Association has selected a dark green fabric that is not translucent. This was done with the intent of having a very low key, tasteful canopy, both during the day and at night. The primary function of the awning is to provide protection from the elements to those entering the building. If the present lighting, in any way, illuminates the new dark green fabric, that lighting will be removed immediately as this is contrary to the image that the Mountain Haus wants to present. rely, ohn F. Mouw eneral Manager JFM/me Mountain Haus at Vail P.O. Box 1748, Vail, Colorado 81658 • 3031476-2434 • FAX: 3031476-3007 For Reservations: 8001237-0922 Project Application Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: �z fav Date //^^ Legal Description: Lot , Block , Filing Comments:'`f- / ',Zone Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL c{_ D Summary: 2—f e7)f//1 Design Review Board Towp Planner Date: � ,'ea Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval ilfi=2' 3: :f: .'iiiii: I s RCV BY:XEROX TELECOPIER 7010 ;12- 5-90 1:32PM ; hi,ThiS'iS 422-9417 TEL No.3034229417 11uN,ALS "AMJA7 VAtL-" �.qz rZr Mr AbOW 0►J�l�k�' A.iY b C�A�'�Or1 V bTF-b n NAJ£-5L(�ld/aG, ALL N VAt_AkCf— SAHs. T.Lt-r- Al OKICjA,! L_ arrgCtf -b F n PI LL.F- 3034229417 3034763007;# 2 Dec. 5,90 14:28 P.02 Agi "AYFes" # 4k4 Dr -r- q4-�Ck Tl,yic-p" 0 LAW OFFICES COSGRIFF, DUNN & ABPLANALP A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Ms. Betsy Roselak Community Development Department Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: Mountain Haus Sign Application Dear Ms. Roselak: y7V- 300 7 ISO NOV 161990 IN LEADVILLE: COSGRIFF, DUNN & BERRY P. O. BOX 11 LEADVILLE, COLORADO 80461 (719) 486-1885 Please be advised that we represent the Medsker Partnership, owner of Unit 111 Mountain Haus, Vail, Colorado. As you are aware, this space is the commercial unit which was formerly occupied by the Corona Cafe and Cantina, Alain's Restaurant, Jose Muldoon's, and other restaurants. It has recently come to our client's attention that the Mountain Haus Condominium Association has made application for use of the canopy on the west side of the building for a sign. This letter shall serve as notice that our client opposes the granting of this application. As you are aware from previous discussion with Scott Medsker and myself, it is our client's position that this space should continue to be used and occupied by the owner as tenant of Unit 1. We anticipate an application will be made for this space in the near future as soon as a new tenant is found for this space. We are attempting to resolve this directly with the Mountain Haus Association, however, we request that you place us on the agenda and give notice of any hearings, staff meetings or activ- ities concerning this application as our client wishes to be heard on this application and to give further input on same. Please send all notices to our office. Thank you in advance for your courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, COSGR F DUNN &BPMAi4 Allen C. Christensen ACC/die cc: Medsker Partnership Roselak - B24rHE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION IS DUNN & ABPLANALP, P.C. IN VAIL. VAIL NATIONAL BANK BUILDING PETER COSGRIFF JOHN W. DUNN SUITE 300 ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP, JR. 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST TIMOTHY H. BERRY VAIL,COLORADO 81657 ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN LAWRENCE P. HARTLAUB TELEPHONE: (303) 476-7552 TELECOPIER: (303) 476-4765 November 14, 1990 Ms. Betsy Roselak Community Development Department Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: Mountain Haus Sign Application Dear Ms. Roselak: y7V- 300 7 ISO NOV 161990 IN LEADVILLE: COSGRIFF, DUNN & BERRY P. O. BOX 11 LEADVILLE, COLORADO 80461 (719) 486-1885 Please be advised that we represent the Medsker Partnership, owner of Unit 111 Mountain Haus, Vail, Colorado. As you are aware, this space is the commercial unit which was formerly occupied by the Corona Cafe and Cantina, Alain's Restaurant, Jose Muldoon's, and other restaurants. It has recently come to our client's attention that the Mountain Haus Condominium Association has made application for use of the canopy on the west side of the building for a sign. This letter shall serve as notice that our client opposes the granting of this application. As you are aware from previous discussion with Scott Medsker and myself, it is our client's position that this space should continue to be used and occupied by the owner as tenant of Unit 1. We anticipate an application will be made for this space in the near future as soon as a new tenant is found for this space. We are attempting to resolve this directly with the Mountain Haus Association, however, we request that you place us on the agenda and give notice of any hearings, staff meetings or activ- ities concerning this application as our client wishes to be heard on this application and to give further input on same. Please send all notices to our office. Thank you in advance for your courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, COSGR F DUNN &BPMAi4 Allen C. Christensen ACC/die cc: Medsker Partnership Roselak - B24rHE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION IS DUNN & ABPLANALP, P.C. IN VAIL. AMERICAN A 12100 West Wheat Rid C "�� _YAL t✓ � �.SL (� n4 IZ.E.Y1.E�•J SO A•R1 /err . i3-rsY X.MO hV, --T)4ANk YM POK YOUk PA•T zLy (-x-146 a _ r R sZGUA4E- R x r4T4 t Ac" 97- N sZ A $ P'oSOCA ra 3 Y F7: !HTA Fr: � G � �i t Ep 11. zD D RM,PRIC ArV A aIv,S,o,Z 01: 0� �✓1VIt�C C BRAD �MPAVr 2049 VVa cl O S T�� I1V� LakEwooy,, Colors o Orth 50215 Sales Otfice �1Ag' hL -- 232' 1612 nk- 7'WD (�,� g.N ur,,S .A ks:u mie-r- l(„ S Ai 6 sLL.tg u wru- (.o Kms„ LOt,1F-,OZd _Tb YO UP,-__ IZ44-IIT J i NiS . E F Y0N AAVIL _A 4L -r QuE.STL.OMI-� "'6l OPS SuaGt~sTr ON WouLb, Yb _q P to NrAV - MP. z►.4rtaT-#_—V- -° AGAL+J ` rtN A." You d P -P -y K LLej� . - �.►� MV�r�3f�- "AM is—rc.4+1 4wkir46 UwP,,4y" -- or.'. T.S.: WOULb YW ldPbPI'P- M ?>LLARDUI6 'Qlk>rtbLa',l6 PeRMIr r P- "hALI,� (.k.LN,D'_u November 20, 1990 Department of Community Development Town of Vail Vail, Colorado To Whom It May Concern: The Mountain Haus Condominium Association Board of Managers has approved a new canopy at the west entrance of the Mountain Haus. This new canopy is to be the same size and shape as the translucent, yellow "Corona Cafe" canopy but will be covered in an opaque dark green fabric. The sign on the canopy is to read "Mountain Haus" and will include the snow flake logo. This is all in accordance with the November 1, 1990 by American Awning Mountain Haus. rely Jbhn F. Mouw Managing Agent application filed Co. on behalf of the Mountain Haus at Vail P.O. Box 1748, Vail, Colorado 81658 • 3031476-2434 • FAX: 3031476-3007 For Reservations: 8001237-0922 November 21, 1990 �3 J Betsy: 5 The heights of the letters comprising the Mountain Haus sign at the front entrance are: Capital M and H are each 16" high t and i are 14" high all other letters are 11" high The snowflake at the end is 23" high. The overall length including the snowflake is 150". The length of "Mountain Haus" only is 124". Y� T T OL *G% We are most anxious to remove the old ye -ft -ow canopy and replace it with the new dark green canopy. I think that this change would only enhance the overall look of the area k� by the covered bridge, which is the main entrance to the village. I hope that the town shares our desire to improve „ this important area as quickly as possible. If the size of 4� the existing sign at the front entrance is a problem, a j� quick solution could be to remove the snowflake. Since I am 1b0 not sure how you calculate square footage of signs, I am not sure if this would be necessary. The new sign to be located i�� L on the new canopy would be sized so as to be in conformance with the code. I would appreciate anything that you could do to expedite v the approval process for us. Please let me know if you need N� + any additional information. ;Ice ly, � 1, John F. Mouw 1� J /me �S Mountain Haus at Vail P.O. Box 1748, Vail, Colorado 81658 • 3031476-2434 • FAX: 3031476-3007 For Reservations: 8001237-0922 C) RECO NOV Q .5.1990 APPLICATION DATE . ll D 819MIAWNING APPLICATIO ase Print or Type) OF PROJECT �� eMOtINf]9TJi a,4U AE v4LL 21AME OF PERSON SUBMITTING ",0-tXtL,hLj AW -N Gb, ° PHONE Dt- I1 LL ADDRESS 4Tr : Lj, wA DSyot" &L -n-, , L&1LWOD� FAME OF OWNER'S Ht -4, 4W& " A77- ' n44 MWW PHONE . a4-14 ADDRESS z 12- SAS 15I(iNXTURB OF OWNER F 4 1 sJ Qom_ , LGCIITIVN OF I'R0.7E C40 bf-� 0, . WL -4T k_- 4 ►►ICL bF AMJt %Tkl(C M k — r �_. "hR . !DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT NE�U V& " ` aPtJ " IrAVLC- L t4M44 o L") Pr -0+4 gil ST'LN r �u.L-.. F Aqr : EL - tOYM, rJ17-t Al t W FAbEt r A 4b AW L066 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. .A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGN/AWNING (FREE STANDINCt WALL, PROJECTING, ETC) , INCLUDE SIGN MESSAGE._A-Ltsr S7'XAL- FgAtLt HAP-kuF,K_ aki on, F-jm� arr16 � 1LJ- � ° + rw� sr &nxm � Na� ,awux 6 a Lo TIo Ice 4 H 1 i gt- I e W17i4 (, RR P0S10wU&N" S. SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL Su►JI A��D7� Na �4t. YUL 4w 5� C. SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO S4PrU»,D S cALf- bK4WT J j D. HEIGHT OF SIGN ABOVE GRADE AMr-A. T 91 04 LDHA-1* �dcy- j. E. DESCRIBE LIGHTING EXISTING OR PROPOSED) A-nul 4� M --2-t4 # Ob 18.L4f-1 Uwerlr_ j49 ATtr (AF -p `M HAML�- F. LENGTH OF BUSINESS FRONTAGE (FT) - G. CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL (ATTACji) H. $20.00 FEE PAID '1 S� CHECK t P JFpUIRED M6TERI&LB SUBMITTED WITH UPLIOTION 1 . €-ttfr pl *}ti 2. '916irations showing exact location of sign or awning on the building 3. photographs showing proposed location 4. Colored scale drawing 5. Sample of proposed materials 6. Photograph of sign if available Sign Administrator 5 U NSI2u1� " `��03� "tItlLn�n 7wD' „IAMTNATE� TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 26, 1990 SUBJECT: A request for a height variance in order to add dormers to the upper floor of the Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Dr. (Part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing) Applicant: Rich Brown/Mountain Haus Condo. Assoc. I. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED The Mountain Haus Condominium Association is requesting a height variance in order to add dormers across the south elevation of the building. The dormers would be added to the 7th floor roof area and would replace existing 18" windows. The intent of the dormer additions is to increase the amount of light which presently enters the south -facing bedrooms. The dormers would not add any GRFA to the building. The Mountain Haus is in the Public Accommodation zone district which has a maximum height restriction of 48 feet. The existing ridge height of the building is 74 feet. Because the Mountain Haus was constructed prior to the adoption of the Town's zoning code, the building is considered a pre-existing, non -conforming use. Although the proposed dormers would not exceed the ridge line of the existing building, a variance is required because the dormers would exceed the 48 foot height requirement of the PA zone district. The height of the proposed dormers would be 72 feet above existing grade (2 feet below the existing roof ridge). II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Department of Community Development recommends denial of the requested variance based upon the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The overall height of the Mountain Haus is significantly greater than other adjacent buildings. The Vail Village Master Plan's conceptual building height plan has identified the surrounding properties and their potential heights as follows: Height (stories)* Vail Athletic Club = 6 Sonnenalp = 3 - 4 Covered Bridge Building = 3 - 4 Gallery Bldg. (Russell's)= 3 - 4 Slifer Building = 3 - 4 Vail Row Houses = 3 - 4 *(a story is defined as 9 feet of height, no roof included) Considering the heights of the existing, adjacent buildings and the recommendations of the Village Master Plan, the staff believes that any height increase for the Mountain Haus would only create a greater disparity of height between the Mountain Haus and neighboring buildings. Staff believes increased height for the Mountain Haus is not compatible with surrounding buildings. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without chant of special privilege. The staff has been unable to identify a physical hardship and subsequently has been unable to support the height variance for the Mountain Haus. We believe that the granting of this variance would be a grant of special privilege, as adjacent buildings are significantly lower in height. 3. The effect of the rectuested variance on light and air, distribution of population transportation and traffic facilities public facilities and utilities and public safety. The staff is of the opinion that the proposed dormer additions would have little, if any, impact on any of the above named considerations. III. APPLICABLE POLICIES FROM VAIL'S COMPREHENSIVE PLANS The recently adopted (Jan. 1990) Vail Village Master Plan has identified the Mountain Haus property as a site which may be considered for a maximum building height of six stories. No specific sub -area concepts of the Village Plan apply to this parcel. The Urban Design Guide Plan for the Vail Village does not include this property. IV. FINDINGS The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. 2. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommendation is for denial of the requested height variance. We believe that approval of this request would be a grant of special privilege and that the variance would not be in compliance with the approved Vail Village Master Plan. The staff also believes that a physical hardship does not exist and therefore the request should not be approved. 00000 999M Ops. -.'00 J!en LZ9Z 9Lti LtLZ xoq o d -aui `-ojellanuu rw ayj OaVE10100 `SIVA snVH NI` INnow 3H1 13aOW3U :COOa U3ddn PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the municipal code of the Town of Vail on March 26, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. Consideration of: 1. A Work Session on Air Quality 2. A request for a conditional use permit to modify an outdoor dining deck, an amendment to restrictions regarding two employee units, and a request for an exterior alteration, a height variance, a site coverage variance and a landscape variance in order to construct an addition to the Bell Tower Building at 201 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Clark Willingham / Bell Tower Associates, Ltd. 3. A request for a Special Development District at the Garden of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5, Vail Village Fifth Filing at 365 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G. Hill Family 4. A request for a setback variance for the construction of a garage on Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Peter Tufo 5. A request for a height variance in order to add dormers to the upper floor of the Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Dr. (Part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing) Applicant: Rich Brown/Mountain Haus Condo. Assoc. 6. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 22 and a major subdivision for resubdivision of Lots 1- 19, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing No. 3. Applicant: Mr. Pat Dauphinais, Dauphinais - Moseley Construction 7. A request for a side yard setback variance and a stream setback variance for Lot 9, Block 3, Vail Row Houses (Unit #9) . Applicant: Walter Gramm The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection in the Community Development Department office. Town of Vail Community Development Department Published in the Vail Trail on March 9, 1990. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MARCH 26, 1990 Present Chuck Crist Diana Donovan Connie Knight Ludwig Kurz Jim Shearer Kathy Warren Dalton Williams Staff Kristan Pritz Tom Braun Shelly Mello Betsy Rosolack Penny Perry The Planning and Environmental Commission meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Diana Donovan, Chairperson. Item No. 1: Approval of minutes for March 12, 1990 meeting_ Diana Donovan asked that, on the top of page 13, the wording be changed to "the applicants should help find a solution". Motion for approval of minutes with corrections was made by Jim Shearer and seconded by Dalton Williams. VOTE: 7 - 0 IN FAVOR. Item No. 2: A request for a side yard setback variance and a stream setback variance for Lot 9, Block 3, Vail Row Houses (Unit #9). Applicant: Walter Gramm Tom Braun presented the proposal for the staff explaining that the applicant was proposing a major remodel to Unit 9 of the Vail Row Houses. The remodel included a reconfigurration of the existing floor layout, an increase in the building roof height by approximately 11 feet and the addition of window seats on the north and south elevations. The proposal did not include a request for any additional GRFA over the allowable. The units were zero setback. The granting of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege and would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. The staff recommended approval of both the side setback variance and the stream setback variance. Diana Donovan asked if there was an applicant's presentation. Ned Gwathmey explained that he was available for questions. He felt the staff did an adequate presentation of the proposal. 1 Greta Parks, an owner at 303 Gore Creek Drive, speaking for Units 1-6 explained that after talking with Ned and looking at the blue prints, she had no objections. Greta asked the board to consider sending public notices to the neighborhood owners, not simply directly adjacent property owners. She felt projects in the Commercial Core I affected the whole neighborhood. Chuck Crist asked about the roof material. He explained that the plans called for shake and he felt that a gravel roof might be more fitting with the adjacent properties. Ned responded that the pitch of the roof restricted this possibility. Ned explained that there was another shake roof in the row of buildings. Chuck then commented that maybe this was a Design Review Board issue. Jim Shearer asked about the flood plain and Tom explained that this was a request for a stream setback and that flood plain was not affected. Motion for approval per the staff memo and the recommendation that the Design Review Board examine the roof material was made by Dalton williams and seconded by Connie Knight. VOTE: 7 - 0 IN FAVOR. Item No. 3: A request for a setback variance for the construction of a garage on Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Peter Tufo Tom Braun made the presentation for the staff explaining that the applicant was requesting a variance from the front setback requirement in order to construct a garage addition. The request was to allow a garage to be built within 3 feet of the front property line along Forest Road. The required front setback for this lot is 20 feet. Surface parking was presently being used in this area. The proposed plan had received conceptual approval from the Design Review Board. The staff recommendation was for approval. The staff believed that the siting of the garage had been designed in the most sensitive manner possible, given the steep topography and large pine tree (to be saved). The staff recommended approval with the following condition: That a revocable right-of-way permit be obtained for any and all improvements on Town right-of-way before a building permit is released for the garage. r 2. That the 2 trees to the north side of the garage remain. If they were damaged they would be replaced with mature trees within 2 years. 3. The garage building be cantilevered in the effort to protect the above mentioned trees. VOTE: 6 - 1 IN FAVOR WITH CONNIE KNIGHT OPPOSED. Z�`� Item No. 4: A rectuest for a height variance in order to add dormers to the unper floor of the Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Dr. (Part of Tract B Vail Village First Filing) Applicant: Rich Brown/Mountain Haus Condo Assoc Tom Braun presented the proposal explaining that the applicant is requesting a height variance in order to add dormers across the south elevation of the building. The dormers would be added to the 7th floor roof area and would replace existing 18" windows. Because the building the constructed prior to the adoption of the Town's zoning code, the building is considered a pre-existing , non -conforming use. Any request would increase the non- conforming use. The staff recommendation was for denial of the requested height variance. The staff believed that approval of the request would be a grant of special privilege and that the variance would not be in compliance with the approved Vail Village Master Plan. The staff also believed that a physical hardship did not exist and therefore the request should be denied. Mark Mueller, acting on behalf of the Condominium Association, stated that the dormers were on the 7th floor not the 8th. All the rooms affected were bedrooms and currently had 3' X 6' windows. The existing building was 74' tall. He didn't feel they were asking for a height variance. They were seeking to improve the roof. At present, the windows did not meet the Uniform Building Code. The dormers would not raise the height, did not affect any view corridors, and would not create a visibility problem to pedestrians. The issue at hand seemed to be the fact that no hardship could be found. He felt that, if the building was not a non -conforming use, the PEC would be happy to see the positive charges. Mark then introduced Jerry Marimonte on behalf of the Condominium Association. 4 Jerry addressed the Board explaining that he had been examining the Uniform Building Code. He questioned whether the Mountain Haus, by definition, was actually adding height. Jerry stated that according to the UBC definition of height, the Mountain Haus would not be adding height. He continued to state that buildings that were non -conforming were allowed to present these kinds of improvements as long as there was no discrepancy. They did not see a discrepancy. Diana explained that the Board left the decision as to who did and did not need a variance to the staff. Tom explained that anything above the 48' allowance whether non- conforming or not still needed a variance. Jerry argued that he felt the board should consider the existing height not that which is "allowed". Kathy Warren explained that she understood what Jerry was saying. However, allowable measurements were what was considered. She gave an example of a building that added height that was in an existing side setback would still require a side setback variance even though the footprint of the building was not changed. Jerry then asked if the Board would not approve the dormers, what would they suggest? Kathy suggested skylights and Jerry felt that skylights would add height. Dalton Williams questioned the fire fighting capabilities in a building of this height and Mark Mueller explained that they had been working with Gary Murrain, the Chief Building Official, on this issue. The building currently didn't conform to code. However, Gary would allow a non-combustible wood. They could consider putting sprinklers on the South side of the Building. Dalton then asked why not the north side of the building and Mark explained that they were only proposing the changes to the South Side of the building at this time. Ludwig didn't see an overall impact. The only place the dormers were visible were from the mountain and would increase the livability of the units. He would be in favor. Chuck Crist asked if they would redo the whole roof with non- combustible material. Mark stated that they would do just the roof portion along where the addition was. If they used sprinklers they would not need the non-combustible material. 5 Kathy Warren commented that she did not see a physical hardship. She could not see making a bad situation worse. She agreed with the staff. Jim Shearer didn't feel that the dormers made a big enough impact to justify the variance. He could not support the variance. A motion for denial per the staff memo was made by Connie Knight and seconded by Jim Shearer. VOTE: 4 - 3 FOR DENIAL WITH CHUCK, DALTON, AND LUDWIG AGAINST DENIAL. Item No. 5: A request for a conditional use permit to expand a proposed parking structure for the Vail Valley Medical Center on Lots # and F, Vail Village 2nd Filing at 181 West Meadow Drive. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center. Kristan Pritz explained that the Vail Valley Medical Center had requested to table this item to the April 9, 1990 meeting. A motion to table the proposal to the 4/9/90 meeting was made by Kathy Warren and seconded by Chuck Crist. VOTE: 7 - 0 IN FAVOR OF TABLING Item No. 6: A request for a special Development District in order to construct three Primary/secondary structures on Lots 3, 4, and 5, Vail Valley Third Filing. Applicant: Deborah W. and Robert Warner Tom Braun explained that the proposal was reviewed at the March 12, 1990 meeting and that at that time, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial to the Town Council. The applicants had amended their proposal with regard to the three secondary units. The applicants had agreed to place a deed restriction on the three lots that would require the secondary units to be rented on a long term basis to employees of the Upper Eagle Valley. The fact remained that any site planning or design aspects of the proposal could be accomplished under existing zoning. The SDD was proposed as a way to circumvent the underlying primary/secondary development standards with regard to site coverage and GRFA. The employee units were being offered as a concession for the density increase. The staff recognized the value of the employee units, but was unable to support the proposal offered. R Bob Warner, the applicant, wished to apologize for not being present at the last meeting. He wanted to give the board some background on the project. Last summer he decided to make Vail a permanent home. He found he could not find any single-family lots. Instead, they found and bought the 3 adjacent lots. He had developed for 20 years and his architect, Jim Junge, for over 30 years. He was now here to plead with the board. They started by asking the staff for direction. They had tried to work with the staff. Mr. Warner stated that his wife had a chronically bad back (he showed a doctors statement prescribing daily swimming as treatment). He had problems understanding the SDD purpose and concept. He felt that what they were proposing could not be done within the existing zoning. He presented the analogy that it would be like preparing taxes without taking deductions. He felt they were making good trade-offs. He pointed out that he had continually been told what a great design they had presented. They had been looking at the project as three lots as a whole. This was why they felt the SDD process was appropriate. He explained that Gary Murrain, Chief Building Official, was anxious for them to get started due to the level of the water table. They are anxious as well and felt that the staff direction had slowed the time table. He requested approval. Jim Junge, architect for the applicant, commented on the staff's concerns with the SDD purpose. He felt that the SDD purpose was to encourage flexibility and this was what they had done. A solution could be accomplished under existing zoning but not necessarily the most positive solution. What they had proposed had no impacts on neighboring properties. They felt they were offering the Town many benefits in exchange for the density transfer as followed: (He showed a list on the flip chart) 1. No 60/40 primary/secondary split. 2. Low Profile 3. Luxury Homes 4. 3 employee units. Tom Braun stated that he took strong opposition with the applicants statement that the staff held up the process. All avenues were reviewed with the applicant including the pros and cons of each alternative. He stated the staff told the applicant's in writing on October 27 that support of an SDD was unlikely. Kathy Warren commented that she felt that nothing had really changed. She still felt that the SDD purpose and integrity must be maintained. The pool could be permitted by deducting GRFA elsewhere. There were other avenues that the applicant had not explored. Jim Shearer had no comment. 7 Connie Knight concurred with Kathy. Ludwig Kurz felt that Kathy expressed how he felt very well. He didn't feel he could approve the project. Dalton Williams concurred. Chuck asked what the specific reasons for denial were at the last meeting? Had it had anything to do with employee housing and asked why they came back. Jim Junge explained that they felt the change of restrictions on the secondary unit was a benefit to the Town. Chuck didn't feel this SDD should be used with trade-offs. Tom Braun explained that this was how the SDD process worked. It was a give and take process. Chuck asked if there were enough trade-offs, would it be acceptable? Kathy Warren commented that a SDD is not appropriate per the last meeting issues. No number of trade-off would be make the project acceptable. Mr. Warner explained that the employee housing was always part of the plan. Under strict zoning, Vail wouldn't get the benefits as pointed out earlier by Mr. Junge. He felt the employee units were a great benefit. He felt they worked out a great solution and that the employee housing should warrant a favorable response. Dalton Williams didn't believe that employee housing units were a good tradeoff. A large house was not a reason for creating an SDD. The point of being on the Planning and Environmental Commission Board was to ensure that rules were applied as written. Diana explained that if they took the extra 804 square feet of GRFA away, she would come close to approving the proposal. She felt it was a great project and encouraged them to proceed to Council. Kristan Pritz wished to point out that the fact that the housing study was not complete was not the reason the staff was recommending denial. Diana stated that she did not wish to set a standard before the standards were set. She could support the project if the GRFA was a total wash. She felt the trade-offs offered were positive. 8 A motion for recommendation of denial to the Town Council per the staff memo was made by Connie Knight and seconded by Kathy Warren. VOTE: 7 - 0 for recommendation of denial to Town Council Item No. 7: A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 22 and a major subdivision for resubdivision of Lots 1-19, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing No. 3. Applicant: Mr. Pat Dauphinais, Dauphinais-Moseley Construction. Kristan Pritz explained that the developer was requesting to make adjustments to the major subdivision and Special Development District No. 22 for the property. The project currently consisted of 24 single family lots, an open space tract, and a new public road, Lionsridge Lane. Changes to lot sizes, setbacks, curb cuts, employee dwelling units, architectural guidelines, and the phasing plan were proposed. In general, the changes to the proposal did not have any major impacts on the subdivision criteria. Due to the fact that the proposal represented a resubdivision of an existing approved subdivision, a reduction in allowable density, had no significant environmental impacts and was compatible with surrounding low to medium density residential uses, the proposed plan was supportable. The Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plan for the major subdivision and the revisions to Special Development District No. 22 for the property. The requested changes generally improved the subdivision and would allow for a more architecturally pleasing development of the property. The conditions of approval for the Special Development District and Major Subdivision were listed in the staff memo. It was also deemed very positive that employee housing was being added. Chuck Crist questioned whose responsibility it was to work the parking problem out with Solar Crest. Kristan responded that staff had suggested that Dauphinais work with Solar Crest. However, it was not a requirement. The problem was Solar Crest's. They had been parking on the applicant's land. 9 Kathy Warren asked for clarification of the GRFA regarding the employee units. Was it in addition to allowed GRFA with the site coverage and any other requirements still intact? Kristan replied that she was correct. Kathy then asked when the employee units were required to be built? At build -out? Kristan answered, "yes". Kathy then commented that there was a possibility that the project could never reach build -out and therefore the Town would never have the employee units. Pat stated that he would be happy to put some type of restriction on phasing of the employee units for example 1 per 4 free market units. Kathy then expressed concern over the drainage plan. Pat explained that his and the Town's engineers felt they had found a better solution. They had revised the plans to take all mitigation off-site by diverting the water back behind Buffer Creek. Agreements would be in place prior to final plat approval. He could not pull any permits until a down payment or a letter of credit had been issued for his financial responsibility on the drainage plan. Buff Arnold, architect, explained that they had increased setbacks on the lots on which they were asking for additional cuts. They increased the lots bordering the highway side and increased 35 to 55 ' setbacks off the ridge. Dalton asked what the reason was behind the setback encroachment of 5 ft. for the decks and Kristan explained that generally, decks were allowed to encroach 1/2 into the setback (normally 7 1/2 feet). The staff felt that it would be reasonable to allow a 5' deck (at grade, unenclosed) encroachment under the circumstance. Buff Arnold explained that there were only 2 issues in which they were not in agreement with the staff. The first was the additional road cuts. The staff had quoted Public Work's concern with safety as the main reason for recommending denial of this portion of the proposal. Buff explained that for safety reasons, they would be able to make room for maneuvering to allow a driver to pull out onto Lionsridge Loop. The driveways would be level so as to avoid any sliding/stopping hazards. Kathy Warren asked if they would consider combining access to two lots. A driveway every 60 feet didn't allow much room for snow removal, storage, or landscaping. Pat explained that there were two driveways close together and then a large distance between the others. Dalton commented that the kids would have a safe side of the street (on the new public road) if they allowed the 4 new road cuts on Lionsridge Loop. He felt this would be safer. 10 Chuck Crist asked if allowing the cuts on Lionsridge Loop would change the front setback and Kristan explained that the front is determined by where the access to the home was located. Buff stated they were not asking for any changes in the setbacks. Chuck commented that if they were to access the homes from Lionsridge Lane (the new public road), the homes would actually be closer to Lionsridge Loop due to the smaller rear setback. Chuck felt he could approve the new curb cuts. Kathy felt strongly that she would like to see the two end driveways combined to one. She asked staff what the major concern was. Kristan replied, "safety". Public Works would not allow large trees. Kristan felt that a landscape buffer would look nicer and would break up a line of homes along Lionsridge Loop. She suggested that if the Commission approved the new 4 cuts, they combine some of the 5 already approved. Kathy Warren felt that if the total 9 drives could be combined to 7 drives she could approve the cuts. Pat responded stating that the essence of a single-family home was degraded by having shared driveways. Kathy said that one could use the same argument to ask that the original 5 approved cuts be moved to the inside. Pat felt that they could do a good job mitigating the curb cuts. Jim asked the applicant if they would agree to combine the closer driveways' entrance to one but access the homes separately. Pat explained that the cuts were based on the orientation of the homes. Connie Knight felt that the drop from 38 to 24 units was welcomed. She didn't want to thwart the project, rather encourage it. She felt it was an undue hardship. Driveways were an unnecessary evil. She would vote for approval of the driveway cuts. Ludwig felt he could approve the 9 driveway cuts. He could think of a lot more things that could be done with all the driveways facing the same direction. Diana felt that the new driveway cuts would be better for the project and bad for the Public. Diana asked for an informal vote to see where the board stood on the driveway cuts. There were 4 for the proposed new road cuts and 3 against. 11 Buff Arnold explained that the employee units were proposed over the garage on the larger units. They would like the opportunity to build them on as many units as possible rather than just the 15 allowed per the proposal. They felt they could do it by increasing the smaller unit garage by 41. They did intend to make the employee units part of the deed restrictions. Diana surveyed the commission regarding the employee units as presented in the memo. They agreed it was acceptable. Diana continued by asking Kristan if it was appropriate to discuss the issue of the employee units being located on the smaller lots. Kristan replied that they could continue if they wished. However, the staff would not want to see the applicant ask for a variance to allow for the employee unit and Pat didn't feel that it would cause a problem with the exception of a few lots. Kristan felt there would be no problem with the employee units on any lot as long as the employee housing units fell within the confines of the SDD requirements. Kathy felt it was appropriate to require 6 and have a maximum of 15 employee units on any lot in the subdivision as long as the home fell within the confines of the SDD. She would like to have seen a phasing plan of employee units to be built at a minimum of 1 per 4 buildings. Pat explained that he would like to come back if he built all 15 and wanted more and Diana explained that he could always come back. Kathy Warren suggested that, if Pat decided to sell the lots and not build himself, that they require him to come back and designate employee housing lots. Diana asked about the phasing plan. She felt that the plan should be in some pattern, not split up. Pat explained that he does not intend to break up the homes, but that he could not predict what would happen. Diana requested a sidewalk and bus shelter and Pat asked if the north side of Lionsridge Lane to the entry would be okay? Diana explained that she didn't feel that it had to be a 5' walk, simply a nice walk and that the shelter should be on the same side of the street. Pat agreed. Diana asked if the footprint of each home would be substantially the same and Pat explained that the footprint will be as different as the lot and setbacks would allow. 12 Diana asked if the Town was a party to all covenants so the Town would have right to litigate as party to the agreement and Kristan answered that the employee dwelling unit restrictions and the architectural guidelines would be restricted with the Town as a party to the agreements. The restrictions would be recorded at Eagle County and run with the land. Kristan pointed out that the garage could not be separated from the unit. Chuck Crist had no more comments. Dalton wished to express thanks, that he felt the project was good for Vail. Ludwig Kurz had no more comments. A notion was made by Kathy Warren and seconded by Chuck Crist for approval of the amendment to the SDD per the finding of the staff memo and conditions listed therein with the following changes and additions: 1. The employee units shall be allowed on any lot including a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 15 as long as the building was built within the zoning confines i.e., variances not requested to allow employee units. 2. The 4 additional proposed driveway cuts be allowed. 3. A sidewalk separate from the street be incorporated on the north side of Lionsridge Lane along with a covered bus shelter to be located at the project entrance on the same side of the street as the sidewalk. 4. Drainage Plan be approved per the Town Staff. 5. Phasing plan for the employee units include a minimum of 1 in the Phase I and 1 in every 4 structures thereafter. 6. Exterior decks be allowed to encroach 5' into the rear setback and 2' into the side setbacks and on grade only on Lots 1-14. VOTE: 7 - 0 IN FAVOR A motion was made by Kathv Warren and seconded by Dalton Williams that the preliminary plan for a maior subdivision be approved per the findings of the staff memo and conditions listed therein with the changes and additions as listed in the conditions of approval for the Special Development District Amendment. VOTE: 7 - 0 IN FAVOR 13 Item No. 8: A request for a Special Development District at the Garden of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5, Vail Village Fifth Filing at 365 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G. Hill Family. Connie Knight removed herself from the board due to a conflict of interest. Kristan Pritz presented a summary of the changes made to the project. Don Hare explained that there were no new comments. Mickey Cannon from the Vail Trail Chalets explained that he felt a view blockage would result from the building orientation and setbacks. He felt that if the building is going to be torn down and rebuilt, it should be treated as a new development and built within the present zoning restrictions. April Carol, a Vorlaufer owner, asked if the north side of the building, which is now a barren wall, could be structurally changed in order to make the wall more aesthetically appealing? Pam Hopkins, architect, stated she would study the issue and present changes to the Design Review Board. Art Carol, representing the Vorlaufer, stated that the main concerns were the view impact and the increase in GRFA. He felt that the Garden of the Gods did their homework when asking for additional GRFA in conjunction with an employee unit. This seemed to be the manner in which most increases were approved. He felt that the staff had written the memo in a biased manner and not simply stated the facts. He felt the wording was misleading. Diana responded in the defense of the staff stating that SDDs typically give additional GRFA devoted to employee units. Mickey Cannon then questioned the SDD purpose to "allow flexibility". He felt this was a general comment. Diana responded that the reason behind allowing the flexibility was that if the Garden of the Gods were to be torn down and rebuilt within the setbacks, it would hurt the Vorlaufer's view and not change the view of the Vail Trail Chalets. The staff felt that it showed sensitivity on behalf of the Garden of the Gods to impact as few buildings as possible. 14 Greta Parks, a residential owner on Gore Creek Drive, didn't want to stand in opposition to any one specific project. She felt there was a county wide problem that needed to be addressed. She felt they were talking about obeying rules or making exception to a changing situation. The quality of life was philosophical and legal. She was not an adjacent owner but definitely a neighbor. As long as the building was being torn down, she would like to see the new building comply with all regulations. She stated that she would also like to see more community input. She felt the public notification process should be expanded to include the neighborhood, not simply the adjacent owners. Diana suggested that the Condominium Associations designate a single person to be responsible for keeping up with the activities within the Town. One way this could be accomplished would be to subscribe to the Vail Trail newspaper in which all notices are published. In regard to the private views, Diana suggested the possibility of approaching the Town Council to adopt legislation. Mickey Cannon reitereated that when he invested in property in Vail, he "expected" the zoning to be upheld. Connie Knight wished to clarify that she could appropriately ask questions and make comments as a member of the public and not a board member. Diana explained that since she had excused herself from the board, she was considered public. Connie Knight, as a Vorlaufer owner, stated that if the accommodation units were decreasing as stated in the Lodge Definition section on page 6 of the memo, this was in discrepancy with the Master Plan's Goal #2, Section 2.3 Objective listed on page 13 of the memo to "Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations." She felt that this was defeating the purpose. Diana explained the "key concept" to Connie. Kristan wished to help clarify the issue. Presently, there were 16 accommodation units. The proposal was for 18 accommodation units which represented a combination of au's and du's as well as lock -offs restricted for short term rental permanently. 15 Kristan Pritz, in response to Mr. Cannon, stated that an SDD is a legal zoning alternative. In response to Mr. Carol, she explained that staff did not rewrite the memo. It was the same memo that was presented in February. The staff did not get involved with private views. She wanted Mr. Cannon to understand that the staff was not trying to slant the request. The staff felt that it was important to present the project in black and white. Jim Shearer liked the safety issue, bus access, underground parking, green area, landscaping, and the employee units and felt part of the trade-offs and reason for the SDD was the employee units. He felt the designer had been sensitive, especially since the issue had been in front of the Commission time after time. Chuck Crist concurred with the board. Dalton Williams concurred. Ludwig Kurz concurred with Jim Shearer. He felt the time spent working with adjacent owners showed sensitivity. He felt the architect had exercised restraint. Doris, with public comment, asked, if the SDD had not been requested, the building torn down and replaced within the current zoning, would it have impacted the Vorlaufer more? Diana explained that, yes it probably would have. The architect had been sensitive. The placement of the building would not have changed the view impact of any other adjacent properties due to the height. In this particular case, they had worked to the advantage of the greatest number of people. She was supportive of the project. Without an SDD, the Town would lose gutters, landscaping, underground parking, and much more. Kathy Warren stated that if the building were built within the present zoning code restrictions, the building could actually be much larger in bulk. There was approximately 2000 square feet in site coverage not used. She felt that the SDD was bringing positive changes to the Town. If an 800 s.f. employee unit was the trade-off for a parking structure, gutters, bus stop, and improved landscaping, she was in approval. However, she did hope to see the zoning regulations cleaned up concerning GRFA. A motion to recommend approval of a new Special Development District to the Town Council per the staff memo with a recommendation to the Design Review Board to review the design (transparency) of the north elevation wall was made by Kathy Warren and seconded by Jim Shearer. VOTE: 6 - 0 WITH CONNIE KNIGHT ABSTAINING. Er. Connie Knight asked what process should be used to begin private view legislation and Diana explained that interested parties should start by calling their Council members. Dalton commented that a private view easement could be purchased. Art Carol asked when the Garden of the Gods issue would go before the Town Council and Kristan answered that it would be on the agenda a week from Tuesday and the meeting started at 7:30 p.m. Item No. 9: Appoint PEC representative for the April - June, 1990 DRB term. Ludwig Kurz volunteered. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 17 BROWN-WOLIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. RICHARD G. BROWN GENERAL CONTRACTOR & DESIGN CONSULTANT REMODELS, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, NEW CONSTRUCTION ffai FEB 2 61990 P.O. BOX 701 VAIL, COLORADO 81658 (303) 949-4186 26. February, 1990 Dear Town of Vail: We wish to add dormers to the top floor of the Mountain Haus on the south side of the building. Enclosed is a floor plan, two elevations and an architectural sketch of the dormer changes. No additional floor space is created. No change in usage is created. The height of the building does not increase - the ridge line of the proposed dormers would be several feet below the top height of the building. The sole purpose of the dormers is to create larger windows in the bedrooms. ( The windows to be replaced are approximately 18" tall and create the look and feeling of living in a basement.) The new dormer windows would bring increased light and ventilation to the bedrooms. Sinc e y, 4 Richard Gene Brown r '0.►' 41/r` BROWN-WOLIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. RICHARD G. BROWN GENERAL CONTRACTOR & DESIGN CONSULTANT REMODELS, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE. NEW CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 701 VAIL, COLORADO 81658 (303) 949-4186 Dear Town of Vail and Mike Mollica; The legal on the Mountain Haus is: Mountain Haus Condominiums, part of tract B, Vail Village #1. The adjoining property owners are: Sonnenalp Building Sonnenalp Properties, Inc. 20 Vail Road Vail, CO 81657 Vail Athletic Club Building JWT 1987 Vail Limited Partnership 352 East Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Luis A. & Nylsa M. Vazquez P.O. Box 50 Mauaguez, Puerto Rico 00709 John M. & Judith Angelo 300 Central Park West New York, NY 10024 Gallery Building P & R Enterprises Units A/B/C/D 228 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 Charles and Elizabeth Koch Unit F/G c/o George Lamb 230 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 The Slifer Building Rod Slifer 230 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 Gorsuch Building Dave Gorsuch Gorsuch Ltd. 263 E. Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 L G� PAGE 2 Covered Bridge Building Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. 170 E. Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Town of Vail Properties Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Vail Townhouses Richard K. Parker Unit 2a & 2d 44 S. Birch Street Denver, CO 80220 James M. Todd & Unit 2b Max L. Euwer 5737 S. Gallup St. Littleton, CO 80120 Sam Gary Unit 2c 13 Village Road Englewood, CO 80110 Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Unit 3a Old Orchard Road Armonk, NY 10504 Harold T. McCune Unit 3b c/o McCune Outboard Marine Co. 2501 Blake Street Denver, CO 80205 Richard B. Tucker Unit 4a 3 Random Road Englewood, CO 80110 Mrs. Joy Hilliard Unit 4b 4600 S. Monroe Lane Englewood, -CO -80110 Jay A. Pritzker Unit 5a & 5b Two First National Plaza Chicago, IL 60670 Elton Parks, Jr. Unit 6a 1 Canitoe Lane Englewood, CO 80110 Barbara Welles Unit 6b 3602 S. Gilpin Englewood, CO 80110 Marion M. Lloyd Unit 7 Route 1, Box 32, St. Mary's Road Libertyville, IL 60048 0 PAGE 3 Velda B. Wyche Unit 8 114 W. 17th St., Suite 725 Austin, TX 78701 Walter P. Gramm Unit 9 695 Prospect St. Winetka, IL 60093 George Knox Unit 10a, 10b 291 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 Robert W. & Mary B. Galvin -Unit 11 Rolling Hills Farm Route 68 Barrington, IL 60010 B.A. & Barbara P. Bridgewater Unit 12 8400 Maryland Ave. St. Louis, MO 63105 Ann L. Rolley, Trustee Unit 13 # Westboro Place Topeka, KS 66604 Enslie 0. Oglesby, Jr. Unit 14 1925 San Jacinto Dallas, TX 75201 Charles P. & Helen S. Storey Unit 14 4400 Rheims Place Dallas, TX 75202 Please contact me if you need any further information. Sin c ely, Richard Gene Brown ' Application Date NEC MEETING DATE APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE I. This procedure is required for any project requesting a variance. The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted. A. NAME OF APPLICANT ADDRESS l`7+8 Va i I PHUNL -��►� B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTAT).VE <<`�� row n. ww-w,,►:�GJo %H ADDRESS_ tDL' �'7a PHONE C. NAME OF OWNER(S) (type or print)- �1c�unfiG,� y �wo%� rn,n, u..� SSe�G.c,� Signature(s)__ - ADDRESS ,,k 17 PHONE 476 D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL �oz X74 ADDRESS S LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT BLOCK FILING E. FEE $100 PAID Z'/CK # '; FROM _rX, THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. F. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and their mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES. II. A PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED TO %DETERMINE IF ANY' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICA'ION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREA5 ING THE NUMB. -P, OF CONDITIJNS OF APPROVAL T4.."T TI'PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MAY ST'rPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERJMIT IS ISSUED. ISI. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PREC;SE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to*other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibilitS and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. OVER Variance -2- 3. The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. B. A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least 1" - 20' stamped by a Colorado licensed surveyor including locations of all existing improve- ments, including grades and elevations. Other elements which must be shown are parking and loading areas, ingress and egress, landscpped areas and utility and drainage features. C. A site plan at a scale of at least 1" - 20' showing existing and proposed buildings. D. All preliminary building elevati,ins and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed on the siti. E. A preliminary title report to verify ownership and easements F. If the proposal is located in a multi -family development which has a homeowners association, then written approval from the association in support of the project must be received by a duly authorized agent for said association. G. Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as determined by the zoning administrator.. * For interior modifications, an improvement survey and site plan may be waived by the zoning administrator. IV. Time Requirments The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A complete application form and all accompanying material (as described above) must be submitted a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the date of tf PEC public hearing. No incomplete applications (as determined by the zoning admil�istratu;r) ;:i11: be accepted by the planning staff before or after the desig- nated submittal date. G 0 INTER -DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT: /17juv�aA Y19 Vs DATE SUBflITTED: 2.2(,,- 90 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING_ 3 •26 90 COPS BENTS NEEDED BY: 3.7 • `l0 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: POP- PUBLIC OcR PUBLIC WORKS Reviewed by: COMMEnts: Date FIRE DEPARTPiENT Reviewed b :___�" '/ Ze Rc6 ee Date on -rents: POLICE DEPARTMENT Reviewed by: Comments: Date RK=='ATiON DEPARTMENT Reviewed by: Date Co gents: V t- N� N T-. .� lb 0_ 4� No .� N s L. g.2 .- s � w o= *0 CL W D O W � CC Q IU6 2 O O Z D O F� OG z o Vc D WCL �U CL LyJ J F February 6, 1990 Department of Community Development Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Sir or Madam: The Mountain Haus Condominium Association approves the concept of adding dormers across the upper roof on the south side of the building. This work would affect the upstairs bedrooms of the south facing units occupying the sixth and seventh floors. This project would be done collectively by the owners of those units. ly J hn F. Mouw eneral Manager JFM/me Mountain Haus at Vail P.O. Box 1748, Vail, Colorado 81658 • 3031476-2434 • FAX: 3031476-3007 For Reservations: 8001237-0922 DCppG��[�C�4 0 QO��a�4�7 D�MC�Op�i CG74 SALES ACTION FORM O1 ACCOUNT # 42415 OTHER CC[),,:' BOOKS ITE!.{ COST TOTAL N0. EA. AMOUNT Foi 0000 0000 41330 41540 CCM. DEV. APPLICATION FEES ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS i 00, I 5.00 I 01 0000 42415 1988 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE I 50.00 01 0000 42415 1988 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE I 36.00 7010000) 42415 1988 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE 32.00 I 01 0000 42415 1 1988 UNIFORM FIRE CODE I I 01 0000 42415 1987 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CCC) CE I 30.00 I O1 0000 42415 OTHER CC[),,:' BOOKS O1 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS (MYLARS) 7.00 01 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES STUDIES .25 01 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES G_ SPE / R� IN. cC710N 01 0000 41322 OFF HOURS INSPECTION Fr --7 01 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS UCLNSES 'FEES :fOOO 41330 OTHER FEES 000 41413 SIGN APPLICATION 20.00 COMMENTS:' pp TOTAL / - Pel.. APER 1 j MAIN ENTRANCE "'. 81;6 6.9 61 _. .4..8166. i'" r - S 870 42' E 200.00' 0t4 r-C,1�41 V '5 1r rte' r4 r A-V -rim IS L 23,"rl H � _ r PZ». 09 166,.6 0- 1�- l .�- X31 fib . 86—J � 1-1,�-� r -M �- X166.13 " -- = __— -- 1 1�s e a 21" /X\ \X/ l P.ARTIAL SITE & DRAINAGE PLAN REVISIONS; O x � 0 0M 00 Q ¢ C,! DATE :10 29 92 DRAWN BY; CHECKED BY; DRAWING; SHEET No. a]