Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 3 BLOCK 1 LOT 1 Landmark 1973-1979to C� town of voil box 100 department of community development vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 May 11, 1979 Kosta's and La Cadeau Box 3124 Vail, 00 81657 Re: Public /Private Joint Venture Program Dear Sir: I am sorry to inform you that your project has not been approved as part of the Public /Private Joint Venture Program for 1979. The Town Council has that your project should not be funded due to their feeling that the landscaping improvements on the outside of the Landmark Addition is the responsibility of the Developer.. I would like to thank you for applying and hope you have a good sumner. Sincerely, James A. Rubin Zoning Administrator JAR:caj ,%-"W C > razixw� lowi box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 May 11, 1979 Goldfinger et al Box 752 Vail, 00 81657 department of community development Re: Public /Private Joint Venture Program Dear Sir: I am sorry to inform you that your project has not been approved as part of the Public /Private Joint Venture Program for 1979. The Town Council has decided that your project should not be funded due to their feeling that the landscaping improvements on the outside of the Landmark Addition is the responsibility of the developer. I would like to thank you for applying and hope you have a good stunner. Sincerely, James A. Rubin Zoning Administrator L?/11 JAR: ca. j -.. +W Project Application Project Name: Project Description: Owner Address and Phone: Date Architect Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Zone: Zoning Approved: Block Filing Design Review Board Date Motion by: _ Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAP PROVAL Zonim Administrator Date: Z� b, Date: Chief Building Official the printery vaO 1 Project Application Project Name: Project Description: C Owner Address and Phone: Architect Address and Phone: -( Legal Description: Lot Block , Filing Zone: _ 7e� -- Zoning Approved: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: Zoning Administrator Date: Date Date: Chief Building Official the printery —i " -\,, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IOWA ofivai department of community development TYPE OF PERMIT ❑ BUILDING ❑ PLUMBING ❑ ELECTRICAL ❑ FOUNDATION ONLY ❑ MECHANICAL ;i�] Flat Work LEGAL D E SC . LOT BLK FILING La ndmark Condo's J0 NAME: OW N E R New heated driveway NAME Gore Range Properties MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. ARCHITECT FIRM 2 MAIL ADDRESS 3000 CITY PH. GENERAL CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. EL FCTRICAL CC JZACTOR FIRM Nev Fl ectric VALUATION MAIL ADDRESS FEES CITY PH, PLUMBING CONTRACTOR FIRM 2,000 MAIL ADDRESS 24.00 CITY PH. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. OTHER `CTOR FIRM ELECTRICAL MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. DATE 5 -11 -79 PROJECT NO. N-- 256 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 II III 1 V(V 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B E H I R (M DIVISION 1 2 2a 3 4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK : Heated Drive PERMIT NO. NE 255 Z 0 j J > BUILDING 2 ELECTRICAL 3000 PLUMBING MECHANICAL TYPE GROUP SQ.FT. VALUATION PERMIT FEES 2,000 BUILDING PERMIT 24.00 PLAN CHECK ELECTRICAL 21.00 PLUMBING MECHANICAL NEW( ) ALTERATION( ) ADDITIONAL (X} REPAIR( ) DWELLING UNITS ACCOMMODATION UNITS G.R.F.A. BEDROOMS COMMERCIAL SYST RESTAURANT SEATING HEIGHT IN FT. BATHTUB /SHOWER NO FIREPLACES NO. TOILETS COVERED PARKING UNCOVERED PARKING RECREATION FEE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CLEAN -UP DEPOSIT 100.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES 145.00 5 -11 -79 VLI FFI CIAL DATE Z ONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE INSULATION FLOOR EXT. WALLS ROOF TYPE THICKNESS R -VALUE Z ONING NOTES: HEAT I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE nnv1 READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THp \1 \ ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY \ 1 WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. ) Irn ELEC: GAS: SOLAR: WOOD: VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST, TAP FEE : SPECIAL NOTES: - ) ' N'NE UK CU KACTOH • town of uai box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 May 11, 1979 Landmark Bldg. Box 1528 Vail, CO 81657 f department of community development Re: Public /Private Joint Venture Program (Landscaping on Western End of Bldg.) Dear Sir: I am sorry to inform you that your project has not been approved as part of the Public/Private Joint Venture Program for 1979. The Town Council has decided that your project should not be funded due to their feeling that this landscaping should be included as part of the landscaping involved with the Landmark Addition. I would like to thank you for applying and hope you have a good sunmer. Sincerely, s A. Rubin Zoning Administrator JAR:caj Landmark Comm. Addition Lot 1, Block 1 \ Vail Lionshead Building Permit #144 -78 1� 10WH of voi box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 department of community development April 25, 1979 Landmark Commercial Development Company Box 1528 Vail, CO 81657 Gentlemen, This Conditional Certificate of Occupancy will be issued on Landmark Commercial Addition with the understanding that all landscaping and paving be completed by July 1, 1979. If these items are not completed, the Town Building Official may cause this to be completed at your expense. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appre- ciated. If there are any further questions, please contact me. I have read and understand the above condition for Conditional Certificate of Occupancy. 9 2 � WMAus,',Kui - 1 d ing Official L n a k C . Addition o'TJ Date Dat SEAL Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of M IC �� ARY PUBLIC w 4 MH 10WHI of box 100 department of community development vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 April 25, 1979 Landmark Commercial Development Company Box 1528 Vail, CO 81657 Gentlemen, Enclosed please find the Conditional Certificate of Occupancy letter for Landmark Commercial Addition. Please sign the form, have it notarized, and return it to us. At that time the Building Official will sign the form and return it to you. If you have any questions, please contact us. Thank you. Sincerely, Sonja Justice Building Department Encl. Landmark Comm. Addition Lot 1, Block 1 • Vail Lionshead Building Permit #144 -78 town of voil box 100 department of community development vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 April 25, 1979 Landmark Commercial Development Company Box 1528 Vail, CO 81657 Gentlemen, This Conditional Certificate of Occupancy will be issued on Landmark Commercial Addition with the understanding that all landscaping and paving be completed by July 1, 1979. If these items are not completed, the Town Building Official may cause this to be completed at your expense. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appre- ciated. If there are any further questions, please contact me. I have read and understand the above condition for Conditional Certificate of Occupancy. Mark W. Marchus, Building Official Landmark Comm. Addition Date Date SEAL Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of NOTARY PUBLIC TOWN OF V A I L BUILDING PLUMBING BUILDING PERMIT z 0 MAIL ADDRESS a MECHANI ELECTRICAL O FF ST. P ARK IN G Q CITY PH. OFF ST. LOA 0O JOBNAME OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS RED. T FLOOR AREA 3. USE ZONE ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CLASS OF WORK NAME NEW 1 1 ALTERATION I 1 ADDITION ( I REPAIR ( 1 w USE OF BUILDING MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. OF BLDG. O O FF ST. P ARK IN G NO. OF STORIES CITY PH. OFF ST. LOA 0O NAME NO. OF LIVING UNITS Z Q MAIL ADDRESS O ¢ CITY PH. U ~ U NAME IL1 w H CONDO. LODGE = MAIL ADDRESS — U CITY PH, SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL Q REAR VARIANCE IJ Q (j LOT BLK FILING to TRACT w w w - O COVERING 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 II III IV V I HR ROOF 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J INT. WALLS § DIVISION 1 2 3 4 3. USE ZONE ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT A REA NEW 1 1 ALTERATION I 1 ADDITION ( I REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO USE OF BUILDING SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. O FF ST. P ARK IN G NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOA NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS (Fill IL1 CONDO. LODGE SIDE SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE TYPE OF HEAT WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( I COVERING EXT. WALLS ROOF INT. WALLS FEES BUILDING PERMIT S P E C I F I E D YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET S T A N D PIPE MECHANICAL DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER APPROVAL I1�" PERMIT AREA SEPARATION TOTAL / OCCUPANCY SEPARATION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE .;!-, �. SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ✓v. ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY , SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE SPECIAL INSPECTOR LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. COVERED I UNCOVERED DATE APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLAN CHECK L PLAN NUMBER the p,o.wryl —I SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR JEFFREY B. SELBY P. O. BOX 1528 VAIL. COLORADO 81657 February 21, 1978 Mr. Thomas IV. Mattio P.O. Box 3124 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Tom: I would like to make a number of comments in reference to your letter of February 20, 1978. My letter of February 15, 1978, was not an attempt to take away space which you wish to keep for your business. It was simply an attempt to alleivate those concerns which you had presented to the Town of Vail. Those concerns were that I am trying to force you to take more space than you need, or that I am trying to close off your exposure to the mall. At no time during this approval process have I tried to do either of these things. In one more attempt to express my willingness to help you solve any problems related to the Landmark addition, I would like to offer you three options in addition to those things outlined in my letter. The following options take into consideration some of the points of your letter dated February 20: A. As outlined in the letter dated February 15, 1978, we will move you into the new space of approximately 6S0 square feet, and release you from approximately the same amount of space so that your shop will be neither larger nor smaller than at present and will have equivalent or better exposure. All of the conditions of that letter will remain as stated. B. If, as you have indicated in your letter, you desire the addition of the new 650 square feet to your present 6S0 square feet, we will provide you with both spaces. The terms of the use of this space will be similar to those for the space which you have under our present lease agreement. Additionally, we will fixturize the new space as we have outlined in our letter dated February 1S, 1978. C. If you do not want to move from your present space and also do not want to add the new 650 square feet, we would be willing to delete that portion of our addition, namely, the 650 square feet immediately south of your present space. According to this option, you would absolutely not feel pressure to take additional space, nor would you feel that we are taking prime square footage away from you. Page Two It is our belief that one of these proposals should satisfy your needs for maintaining and improving your present business. You have the option to stay as you are, with no additional space added to your shop, or to move into new space of comparable size, with better exposure, or to add addi- tional prime retail space. In addition to providing you with one of the above options, we are willing to abate your rent on a daily basis for each day you must be closed because of construction relating directly to your space. During the construction period we will continue to provide access to your space with the exception of a small number of days in the very beginning of construction which should be during late April or early May. Regarding some of the specific statements in your letter, I realize that you made a payment of $2,000 to acquire the additional former office space on October 7, 1977. However, I would like to remind you that this acquisition would not have been possible if we had not contributed an additional $1,000 to that transaction. I would also like to remind you that a number of con- cessions were made by us to finalize a new lease on your present space and the new space, combined. Please do not insinuate that you, alone, invested time and money into this converted office space. Furthermore, do not imply that we are eager to take advantage of your boutique- oriented improvements, as we would probably return this space to office use, should you give it up. Your new lease agreement was negotiated during the month of September, 1977, and executed on October 7, 1977. At that time, we had no plans for the expansion. We had merely considered the possibility, and made no attempt to hide it. The possibility for such expansion was even provided for on your lease, where it refers to the display case for the first level. The fact is that the Landmark expansion plans were developed during the month of November, and that you were notified of those plans within three days of my receiving them. I at no time deceived you about our plans in an attempt to force you to take the former office space. It obviously would have been easier and cheaper for me to have left that space as office space, had I made plans for expansion in September. In reference to the ground level display window, I mentioned it only to reas- sure you that its new location would be handled in a fair manner, in order to provide you with mall exposure. In no way did I imply that we were doing you a favor. Regarding the new doorway to the proposed deck area east of the new space, I simply felt that this might be advantageous to you. Since you feel it would be detrimental, we are happy to omit it. In no way are we trying to hamper your operation by providing what we consider beneficial features to the new space. In your letter you claim that I have verbally agreed to accept all terms of a new proposal by you. This proposal is obviously greatly different from our original agreement, arrived at on February 7, 1978. In my discussion with Jim Asher, who does not represent either party, on February 15, I stated only Page Three that I would discuss these points with my partners, and that if they were acceptable to all of us, I would contact you. The additional requirements which you have proposed are unacceptable to us. We feel it is unfair that you require payment of $13,000 for "damages ", especially in light of the preceding solutions we have offered you. As experienced landlords, my partners and I have always felt that what is good for the tenant is good for the landlord, and vice versa. We have dealt with you accordingly in the past, when you have had problems, particularly in paying your rent. We regret that you have not placed the same importance on mutual cooperation, and especially that you have chosen to use the Town Council as a forum for your complaints. Please let me know which of the options we have provided you with best satisfies your needs. Your letter dated February 20, indicates that you desire the new 650 square feet in addition to the space you presently occupy. If this is the case, I feel that proposal B will completely satisfy your concerns. If this is not the case, we will be happy to proceed with one of the other proposals. I look forward to the final resolution of this problem and to providing you with the best possible space for your business. Yours truly, Jeffrey B. Selby JBS /sp JEFFREY B. SELBY P. O. BOX 1528 VAIL. COLORADO 81657 February 15, 1978 Mr. Thomas W. Mattio P.O. Box 3124 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Tom: In an effort to satisfy your concerns with our proposed expansion of the commercial space in the Landmark Building in Lionshead, I propose the following measure be taken in relation to your existing shop, the Le Cadeau boutique: At no cost to you, we will move you forward into the new space of approximately 650 square feet and release you of approximately that same amount of space, so your shop will be neither larger nor smaller than it presently exists. In addition to moving you for- ward, we will provide the new space with carpeting to match what presently exists, painting of walls the same color as other walls, drapes to match the existing drapes and ceiling and lights in the new space as you presently have. If it interests you, we will pro- vide a new door, in addition to the one you have, out onto the new deck area immediately east of the new space. The display case that you presently use will be moved, but a comparable display case will be provided in the same general area, but further out toward the mall area. In this way, you will not be burdened with more space than you need nor will you be deprived of space you want for your operation. This will also accom- plish your desire to maintain exposure to the mall along the south side. In fact, your exposure will increase as your shop will now have more window space toward the mall than before. It would appear to me that this solution will totally satisfy your long term problem of losing your exposure to the mall or being "forced" to take more space than you want or can afford. Although this proposal will be quite expensive for us, I am quite confident that this move will resolve your and the Town of Vail's concerns with this aspect of the Landmark commercial expansion proposal. I am sorry we have had our differences in trying to resolve this addition, but now look forward to providing you with even better space than you presently have. Page Two If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, LANDMARK COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Jeffrey B. Selby JBS /sp cc: Town of Vail box 100 department of community development vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 7 February 1978 Allen Gerstenberger Director Department of Community Development Town of Vail Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 Ref: The Landmark Design Review Dear Allen: On Thursday, February 2, 1978, we met with Jeff Selby to review the proposed design of additions to the Landmark. The addition requires the granting of two variances. 1.) Permission to build to the east property line. 2.) Permission to build to within 15 -feet of the south property line rather than to the 28 -feet required. My comments are these: 1.) The project is a desirable one for it will improve the shopping experience and scale of space at the west end of the LionsHead Mall. Most critics of LionsHead have expressed the opinion that shopping spaces are too wide and that selectively narrowed areas would be an improvement. 2.) The use of metal roofing and metal overhangs will de- empha- size the visual importance of the very wide concrete members of the existing building. This will result in an improved scale and fineness in texture not now present. Page 2 Allen Gerstenberger Town of Vail 7 February 1978 3.) The shops both at ground level and second level, have excellent southern exposure which is comfortable to shoppers. The second level in particular has excellent potential for outdoor uses and the proposed deck should be sized to permit current or future flexibility of use. The deck with possible use of plants and umbrellas, would be delightful to see and to see from. Its proximity to views and to the adjacent open space corridor suggests that this is one of the ideal locations in LionsHead. 4.) The following modifications to the submitted Aland are recommended. One print was marked with suggested revisions and left with Ms, Toughill. a. The south wall of the ski shop should be set back 4 feet further. This includes the wall and the roof overhang. b. Tha southwest corner of the second level clothing shop should be at an angle of 45 rather than 90 c. The deck south of the lounge is to be 24 feet wide from wall to deck rail. d. The heavy concrete columns in front of the ski shop are neither necessary, nor attractive, thus should be deleted. e. The free - standing stairway should be deleted. Access to the second level by use of steps on grade at the east side is preferred. Permission to use the bank for access may be needed from Vail Associates, f. The lower level center door providing access to the second level is an important design eleanent and requires special attention to the size and detailing. g. A landscape plan is required showing added trees east of the building and any other modifications to the open space. Additional planting may be needed in the mall south and west of the new addition. h. Parking was discussed and it was agreed that the removal of existing landscape to park 25 or 26 cars was not desirable. Available parking has never been fully used. The applicant agrees to assign equal value to parking elsewhere in LionsHead for public use. Page 3 Allen Gerstenberger Town of Vail 7 February 1978 In my opinion the project is a desirable addition to the LionsHead Core and I recommend approval and granting of variances with conditions as listed above. Sincerely, EB /gw cc: Terry Minger Diana Toughill Jeff Selby ta�(� vwt I - Eldon Beck Royston, Hanamoto, Beck & Abey LEGAL DESC. LOT BLK FILING J NAME: ACCOMMODATION UNITS O NER j�'� CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MAILADDRESS � 6 CITY / / PH. l , ARCHITECT FIRM MAIL ADDRESS 2 7 GENERAL CONTRACTOR FIRM C MAIL ADDRESS DATE PROJECT NO. MAILADDRESS „ '" NO 0 Val PLUMBING CONTRACTOR 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION III III IV V CITY PH. PERMIT NO department of community development MAIL ADDRESS 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B E H I R M FIRM BUILDING CITY PH. TYPE OF PERMIT DIVISION 1 2 2a 3 4 Zo — ELECTRICAL GENERAL DESCRIPTIO OF ORK : a PLUMBING BUILDING ❑ PLUMBING ❑ ELECTRICAL ❑ FOUNDATION ONLY Q > MECHANICAL ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ ��.., LEGAL DESC. LOT BLK FILING J NAME: ACCOMMODATION UNITS O NER AME COMMERCIAL SYST MAILADDRESS � 6 CITY / / PH. l , ARCHITECT FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. GENERAL CONTRACTOR FIRM C MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. El '; TRICAL CG. ACTOR FIRM MAILADDRESS CITY PH. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR FIRM MAILADDRESS CITY PH. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. OTHER CONTRACTORI FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. TYPE GROUP SO FT. VALUATION NEW( ) ALTERATION( ) ADDITIONAL( ) REPAIR( ) DWELLING UNITS ACCOMMODATION UNITS G.R.F.A. BEDROOMS COMMERCIAL SYST RESTAURANT SEATING HEIGHT IN FT. BATHTUB /SHOWER NO FIREPLACES NO. TOILETS COVERED PARKING UNCOVERED PARKING INSULATION TYPE I THICKNESS I R -VALUE FLOOR EXT. WALLS ROOF HEAT ELEC: GAS: SOLAR: WOOD: VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST. TAP FEE SPECIAL NOTES: N2 1 1 2 PERMIT FEES BUILDING PERMIT �D PLAN CHECK ELECTRICAL PLUMBING MECHANICAL �} RECREATION FEE -�- DESIGN REVIEW BOARD - CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT )1 Z 5 TOTAL PERMIT FEES IL I 0 FICIAL DATE )NING ADMINISTRATOR DATE )NING NOTES: I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE * KW" READ THIS APPLICATIO ND STATE THAT THE 1C�y�I t ABOVE IS CORK CT AND G ' O COMPLY WITH ALL TOW ORDI N S ND STATE L�]N JCTION. CONSTRUCTION town o Vol department of community development TYPE OF PERMIT [9�ELECTRICAL UILDING ❑ ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PLUMBING FOUNDATION ONLY PERMIT'' LEGAL DESC. LOT BLK FILING�✓� /�s?�1�- Jr NAME: OWNER AME MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. ARCHITECT FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. GENERAL CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH FEC AL O FIRM MAILAD DRESS R CITY PH. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. [MECHANICAL ONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. O ✓ `�� CONTRACTOR FIRMQo-,If_ •l," MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. DATE PROJECT 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I I III IV V 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP ;&B H I R M DIVISION 1 (02a 34 G NER AL DESCRIPTION OF WORK : TYPE GROUP SQ. FT. VALUATION NEW( ) ALTERATION( ) ADDITIONAL( ) REPAIR( ) DWELLING �� UNITS ACCOMMODATION UNITS '' G.R.F.A. �-8 Z�� BEDROOMS COMMERCIAL SYST RESTAURANT SEATING HEIGHT IN FT. BATHTUB /SHOWER NO FIREPLACES NO. TOILETS COVERED PARKING UNCOVERED PARKING "- INSULATION TYPE THICKNESS R -VALUE FLOOR EXT. WALLS ROOF HEAT ELEC: GAS: SOLAR: WOOD: VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST. TAP FEE SPECIAL NOTES: NO. V 054 PERMIT NO. BUILDING a z ELECTRICAL O PLUMBING > MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES BUILDING PERMIT Z, Y b PLAN CHECK Z U ELECTRICAL 0 G PLUMBING MECHANICAL RECREATION FEE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CLEAN -UP DEPOSIT TOTAL PERMIT FEES r �l BUIL� FFICIAL DATE T CL ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE ZONING NOTES: 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. {- K SIGNATURE. OE Ol1'NF:R OR CONTHM FOR Project Name: Project Description: Owner Address and Phone: Architect Address and Phone: T Legal Description: Lot Zone: Zoning Approved: Project Application i Block Filing Design Review Board Date. Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL Summary: A . rz i g Admi istrator Chief Building Official Date: Date: the printery vad 1 . • 0 N. D. LESSANI, M.D. 21459 WOODFA . DRIVE, NORTHVILLE MICHIGAN 48167 January 17, 1 4 Rol Smith Gore Range Properties Vail, Colorado -1.1657 near ', -,Ait! In response to vour letter of December 2:!, 11177, concernip.7 pt-nansio of t'lle c0r,-.ercial s of Lan(T "lower. 4e 0 - prOSe anv lease of our portion of La-dmark Towers to an Parties involve d.- , ao person or. , aut'ior to 10.1se our portion of lanrl to !;nvonc- letter beinn sent to voii tlarou Ir' - I co forwarded to t7ie 1-, J-t 7 of Vail zorti-or- A.0-linistrator. Siiicerel7, !'-rs. Lorraina " N , " David T '7r . N. D. LESSANI, M.D. 21459 WOODFARM DR. NORTHVILLE, MICH. 48167 W V z N Q H N 0 C;ty of Vail .. o 0 REGIS Zoning Commisioner a Z TERED Vail, Colorado 81657 cIIQ �g �. , . -_z. x RET f "ED ° r S 11 J } ir, N � LaVRI OLAN yw wy . -�.� x; e _� N � LaVRI OLAN yw wy . f'- [, ... ----- --. -... -- _- - '-- _ I ..s f •r( Z C� TO: Department of Community Development Planning Commission Town of Vail FROM: Jennings Wright, Vail Resort Development, Ltd. SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Vail Resort Development, Ltd., is asking for approval of a conditional use permit to allow a private club on the "McCallister Property." Project Demographics - • Developer and Owner Vail Resort Development, Ltd. Jennings Wright _ General Partners Fitz Scott • Property "McCallister Site" - Located adjacent to Sandstone and Potato Patch area • Zoning Residential Cluster - 6 units /acre • Site Approximately 11 acres • Access Sandstone Road P ropo s ed De velopment It is proposed that the property be developed as an exclusive residential complex with a tennis and swimming facility. The proposed development will consist of the following: • 41 - Homes (Duplex Design) Approximately 2000 SF /unit - Parking Requirement - 2 cars /unit Compliance - 1 car garage 1 space adjacent to garage - 3 phases (3/4 years) Jennings Wright, Vail Resort Development, Ltd. Page 2 • 8 - Tennis courts • 1 - 25' meter swimming pool, diving pool, kids wading pool • Club House - 4000 SF includes: - Men's and Women's Lockers - Childrens Lockers - Restaurant and Bar - 50 seats - Pro Shop The Club will be owned by the Condominium /Homeowner Association (undivided interest) and leased to the Vail Athletic Club for operations. The Vail Athletic Clut membership will tjv the facility. All home Owner's will be members of the Vail Athletic Club. Parking for C Faci The site is large enough to accommodate sufficient parking for the proposed facility. In order to meet the parking use of the facility, the applicant proposed the following: 1. Review "maximum and hypothetical use of facility." 2. Site plan includes 45 cars for parking with additional area to the west of interior road for potential increase, if use requires. 3. Developer realizes that the home vs. club facility may cause conflicts with use of' parking. Developer may ask for additional parking if use requi res. 4. Developer observes that Town tennis courts (Golden Peak) have very few cars parked for summer use except for special occasions. Ot her Planning Co nsi der ations 1. Realignment and landscaping of Sandstone Road 2. Pedestrian /Bicycle access to Pedestrian Overpass 3. Landscaping of USFS lands MAXIMUM AND HYPOTHET USE OF FACILITY 0 1. Homeowners will be using facility and no parking will be required, if 20% of facility used by home- owners. Need 8 -10 fewer cars. 2. The facility is summer use only - use of bicycles and walking via Sandstone overpass not included. 3. Vail Athletic Club will have bus service to Club from downtown facility. 4. Town of Vail bus service available in winter. MAXIMUM USE HYPOTHETICAL USE :ti_vity Pao. /People No. /Cars No. /People No. /Cars Assumptions ?nnis (8) 32 32 26 16 3 Singles - 1 car/ 1 Person 5 Doubles - 1 car/ 2 Persons. +i0 9 40 20 40 13 40 Users - 3 per car lub House Employees 8 8 8 8 All employees drive Restaurant 20 20 20 10 2 Per Car 100 80 94 47 Assumes 1 car/ 1 Person FACTORS NOT IN CLUDED: 0 1. Homeowners will be using facility and no parking will be required, if 20% of facility used by home- owners. Need 8 -10 fewer cars. 2. The facility is summer use only - use of bicycles and walking via Sandstone overpass not included. 3. Vail Athletic Club will have bus service to Club from downtown facility. 4. Town of Vail bus service available in winter. MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 21 FEBRUARY 1978 The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was convened in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal.Building at 7 :30 P.M. on Tuesday, February 21, 1978. Mayor Rod Slifer and the following Councilmembers were present: Paula Palmateer Tom Steinberg Bill Heimbach Bill Wilto Bob Ruder John Donovan Others present included: Terry Minger, Town Manager Larry Rider, Town Attorney ORDtNaeNCE NO. 3, Series of 1978, imposing a Land Transfer Tax, was introduced on second reading. Mayor Slifer read the title of the ordinance into the official record: "An Ordinance Imposing a Land Transfer Tax upon the Transfer of Interests in Real Pro perty; Earmarking the Proceeds Therefrom for the Purchase of Real Property to be used for Open Space, Recreational or park Purposes, or'Employee Housing; Requiring the Collection of such Tax'by the Town Manager or his Agents; Exempting Certain Transactions from the Tax Imposed; Establishing Procedures for Acquiring a Certifi- cate of Exemption; Establishing a Land Acquisition Advisory Com- mittee; Establishing Penalties for Violations of this Ordinance; Creation of a Lien of the Property Transferred for the Amount of the Tax Unpaid; Submitting this Ordinance to the Qualified Electors of the Town; and Setting Forth Details in Relation to the Fore- going". He then asked if all Councilmembers had read the ordinance, and all had. He stated that the Tax would go to a public vote on Tuesday, April 4, 1978, and would become effective immediately upon certification of the votes, if a majority of voters vote in favor of it. Councilman Donovan then moved to approve the ordi- nance on second reading; Councilman Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. The Town Clerk was instructed to have the ordinance published by title only. ORDINANCE NO. 4, Series of 1978, rezoning Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village Twelfth Filing, was introduced on second reading. Mayor Slifer asked if all Councilmembers had read the ordinance; all had; and there was no discussion. Councilman Heimbach moved to approve the ordinance on second reading; Councilman Wilto seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. The Town Clerk was instructed to have the ordinance Dublished by title only. ORDINANCE NO. 5, Series of 1978, making a supplemental appropria- tion in the amount of $10,000 for Colorado Mountain College, was introduced on first reading. Mayor Slifer explained that the appropriation was to fund the 1978 SummerVail Workshop. Stan Bernstein stated that he had reviewed the CMC budget as requested at the.last regular meeting of the Council. Councilman Donovan stated that he viewed the appropriation as a one -time occurrence, the other members of the Council agreed, as did Randy Milhoan of CMC. Councilman Donovan then moved to approve the ordinance on first reading; Councilman Ruder seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. The Town Clerk was instructed to have the ordinance published in full. MINUTES TOWN COUNCIL /FESARY 21, 1978 • • Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. 6, Series of 1978, correcting a typographical error in Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1978, was introduced on first reading. Diana Toughill explained that Ordinance No. 2 had rezoned the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 3, Bighorn Third Addition, from MDMF to A, and that the legal description should have read the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 8, Bighorn Third Addition. Councilman Donovan moved to approve the ordinance on first reading; Councilman Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. The Town Clerk was instructed to have the ordinance published in full. The persons involved in.,items 5, 6, and 7 on the agenda had not yet arrived, therefore the Council moved down to item 8 - The Printery's request for an amendment to its conditional use permit to allow Swede's Sign Shop, an existing use in the building. Diana Toughill explained that the real estate office which had originally requested an amendment to the conditional use permit had withdrawn its request, but that an amendment was required for the existing sign shop. She added that the Planning Commission had recommended approval unanimously. Councilwoman Palmateer moved to approve the request; Councilman Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. With regard to the*100 -year flood plain amending the comprehen -. sive plan, Ms. Toughill explained that two new bridges in the Bighorn area had altered the flood plain and that Hydro -Triad had re- mapped the area, which map now needed to be incorporated into the comprehensive plan as an amendment. Councilman Donovan moved to amend the comprehensive plan by the addition of the Hydro -Triad map dated January 12, 1978, which amends the original map dated May, 1975; Councilman Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. Councilman Wilto requested that a letter be sent to the Public Utilities Company and Mountain Bell requesting the removal of certain cables in the Bighorn area which could cause flooding of Gore Creek if debris were to collect. Kent Rose agreed to send the appropriate letters. A short recess was called at 8:25 P.M. pending the arrival of Chuck Thomas, Vail Associates, and representatives of the Landmark Building. The meeting was reconvened at 8:35 P.M. With regard to the Thomas Residence request for setback and distance - between - buildings variances, Ms. Toughill explained that the request was for a 3.5 foot setback variance and 15 feet between buildings. She added that the Planning Commission had unanimously recommended approval. Chuck Thomas presented a letter of approval signed by neighbors on each side of his lot. Councilman Wilto moved to approve the requests; Councilman Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. Representatives from Vail Associates had not yet arrived, therefore the Council moved to the Landmark Building request for setback and parking variances. Jay Peterson, attorney for Landmark, read two letters from developer Jeff Selby to tenant Tom Mattio, into the record (attached). Mr. Mattio's attorney requested a few minutes recess in order for his client to further consider Mr. Selbv's offers of compromise. The Council refused to grant any further time, and Mr. P4attio then agreed to Mr. Selby's terms. Larry Rider referred to the December 13, 1977, memo from the Department of Community Development to the Planning Commission, in reminding the Council of what it must consider in granting or not granting the variances. He stated that according to the Zoning Code, the Council consider: 1. the relationship of the requested var- iances to other existing or potential uses and structures in the Wi MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNC *FEBRUARY 21, 1978 • Page 3 vicinity; 2. the degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regula- tion is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege; and 3.' the effect of the requested variance on light and air, dis- tribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. Mr. Rider added that the Council is required to consider the public wel- fare, not just the welfare of a particular tenant. Councilman Heimba h moved to a the request for setback variance, incorporating the guidelines o e December 13, memo and incorporating a comprehensive sign program; Councilman Wilto seconded the motion; the motion carried with a vote of 6 -1 with Councilman Donovan voting against the motion. With regard to the Landmark's request for a arkin variance for 26 cars, Mr. Peterson volunteered a sum of money, to be esta is ed by the Town Council, to be placed in an escrow fund by his client for funding of future parking in lieu'of the 26 spaces required by the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Selby s tated that the nrP�Pnt spaces which, he felt, were not necessary anyway. Councilwoman Palmateer moved to approve the request for a Parking variance l e condition t at per par ing space go into an escrow ui u ure o e used for a parking study; .Councilman Ruder seconded the :notion; and the motion carried with a vote of 6 -1, with Councilman Heimbach voting against the motion. With regard to the appeal of an administrative decision regarding Gondola I by the Plaza Lodge, Mr. Rider stated that Charles McDermott, counsel for the Plaza Lodge, had reauested that the appeal be indefinitely tabled, pending an agreement between Vail Associates, Inc. and the Town of Vail for the purchase of the Gondola I site. Mr. Slifer announced that after the Council's vote not to purchase Gondola I on February 7, 1978, the Council had met once again with representatives of Vail Associates and had reached a tentative purchase agreement. He stated the terms of the new agreement: 1. VAI would sell the site to the Town of Vail at the original purchase price of $400,000; 2. an anon- ymous donor would donate-$100,000 toward either the landscaping of the area or toward the purchase price; 3. VAI would deed five acres of stream tract to the Town of Vail; and 4. VAI would deed the LionsHead malls to the 'Town and pay $150,000 toward their future maintenance as well as heating the malls for the next ten years. There was no further discussion, and Councilman Donovan moved to proceed with the purchase agreement on the terms outlined above; Councilman Wilto seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The owner of Cabbages and Kings, located on the LionsHead Mall, complained about solicitors selling time - sharing in the Sunbird Lodge who were operating from the mall area. Chief of Police Gary Wall stated that Vail Associates had been contacted and that they had asked the solicitors to stop. He agreed to follow up on the situation. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. Mayo ATTEST: Town Clerk WNSTRUCTION PERMIT / 4Z , 7 �. P DATE/ ROJECT NO UILDING PLUMBING ECTRICAL El FOUNDATION ONLY I r( MECHANICAL F] 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION III 1 V V department of community development 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP AgE H I R M DIVISION 62 34 TYPE OF PERMIT GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK: LEGAL DESC. LOT FILING BLK 1 • ��-- JOB NAME: ACCOMMODATION UNITS y- TA 11L BEDROOMS ER NAME MAIL ADDRESS HEIGHT IN FT. BATHTUB /SHOWER CITY PH. ARCHITECT FIRM COVERED PARKING UNCOVERED PARKING MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. GENERAL CONTRACTOR FIRM r" e MAILADD R ESS 390)f 9.5 1TY H.47t 43 ELECTRICAL CCWACTOR FIRM 97" MAIL ADDRESS CITY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR FIRM MAILADDRESS& RAJ SCOTT CITY PH. MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CIT PH. OTFtER CONTRACTOR FIRM MAIL ADDRESS CITY PH. TYPE GROUP SO. FT. VALUATION Y NEW ( ) ALTERATION ( ) ADDITIONAL ( ) REPAIR ( ) PLAN CHECK ��-- DWELLING UNITS ACCOMMODATION UNITS G.R.F.A. BEDROOMS COMMERCIAL SYST /gyp RESTAURANT SEATING HEIGHT IN FT. BATHTUB /SHOWER DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .�. NO FIREPLACES NO.TOILETS - COVERED PARKING UNCOVERED PARKING INSULATION TYPE I THICKNESS FLOOR EXT. WALLS ROOF R -VALUE ING ADMINISTRATOR ING NOTES: HEAT O ELEC: GAS: E �� 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAV 14 l o t � SOLAR: WOOD: READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE"'111111��` ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY U VAIL WATER & SAN. DIST. TAP FEE: WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. SPECIAL NOTES: O WNER MGNATQR CON TRACTOR PERMIT NO. NO 1 23 BUILDING ZO ELECTRICAL PLUMBING > MECHANICAL /B 4.061 PERMIT FEES BUILDING PERMIT tj PLAN CHECK ��-- ELECTRICAL Gl7 PLUMBING MECHANICAL RECREATION FEE $� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .�. CLEAN -UP DEPOSIT //1/�► TOTAL PERMIT FEES � 1 '000' IL�N N ?I A 4 �� DATE �t MINUTES /- �✓ Li REGULAR MEETING 1� YAiI TOWN COUNCIL y 17 JANUARY 1978 ` ( j- , Colorado wa s Council Chambers: , January 17 The regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Yai1 convened 7:45 PM on Tuesday, 1978, in the Vail Municipal Building Mayor Rod Slifer and the following councilmembers were present: John Donovan Bill Wilto Robert Ruder Bill Heimbach Paula Palmateer Tom Steinberg Others present were: Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager Larry Rider, Town Attorney Minutes from the Town Council meetings of December 6, 1977; December 20, 1977; and January 3, 1978 were introduced by Mayor Slifer. Councilmember Wilto moved to approve the minutes; Councilmember Ruder seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1978 ,commending the State of Colorado Highway Department with regard to the Vail Pass portion of Interstate Highway 7C, was introduced and read by Mayor Slifer. The Mayor then commented that he believed the construction project would serve as a model for other highways in the state. He then introduced Mr. Procense from the State Department of Highways who introduced Mr. Ron Marshall and Mr. Matt Smith whom he credited for their assistance on the project. He stated that the expectation was that the highway project would be totally completed by next summer. Town Manager Terry Minger added his comments regardi,g the commendable project and stated that he and Mr. Procense would be working together to develop a study of the possibility of a traffic signal at the Four -Way Stop and another regarding the Possibility of the Town of Vail undertaking the maintainence of Highway Six in the Bighorn area. Councilmember Donovan moved to approve the Resolution; Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1978, adopting the 1977 Supplement to the Vail Municipal Code, was introduced on first reading by Mayor Slifer. There was on discussion from Council or the public. Councilmember Steinberg moved to approve; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1978, rezoning Lot 4, Block 1, Bighorn Third Addition, Lot 27, Block 2, Vail Village Thirteenth Filing, and Lot 3, Block 9, and the South 112 of Lot 1, Block 3, Bighorn Third Addition, was introduced on firse reading by Mayor Slifer. Town of Vail Zoning Administrator, Diana Toughill, explained details of the rezoning requests. There was no discussion or questions from either the Council or the Public. Councilmember Ruder moved to approve; Councilmember Steinberg seconded the notion; ail present voted in favor and the motion passed. The next item of business for the Council was a request for setback and parking variances for Landmark. Mayor Slifer asked Larry Rider to explain the situation. Mr. Rider in turn asked Diana Toughill to recap the history of the variance requests. Mr. Rider then clarified the procedural requirements which have been met by the developer and reminded the Council of the criteria for making a decision in this case being the conditions of the variance request only. Mr. Jeff Selby, developer, then presented the revised plan for development of the proposed addition. He stated that the parking variance question would be discussed later. Mr. Volpe, Attorney for Kostas Taverna, a tenant in the Landmark Building, questioned whether it is appropriate for Council to hear Mr. Selby's request., Larry Rider advised Council that they may hear the request for variance pending the outcome of determination of ownership of project and that it was appropriate for the Council to hear Mr. Volpe's argument on behalf of his client. Mr. Volpe continued to say that his client objects to the present plan for the project since it differs from that which his client was led to believe would be presented and feels that the unknowns in the present project would materially damage his client. Mr. Jay Peterson, attorney for Landmark, stated that the project as currently presented to the Council had MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL PAGE TWO 17 JANUARY, 1978 the approval of the majority percentage of the Board of Directors. He then went on to point out that the proposed plan was in keeping with the recommend- ations made by the Town ov Vail and Vail Associates planning staffs. Mr. Selby reinterated that it was difficult to finalize details with tenants until they know what the final project proposal will be, following variance procedures. There was a general discussion between the Councilmembers, Mr. Rider, Mr. Selby, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Volpe regarding conditions under which the variance may or may not be granted. Mayor Slifer then clarified the choices of the Council re- garding the variance requests. Councilmember Wilto then moved to approve the setback variance request with the condition t e o - t a first oor r cons ruc ion ouncil approva e enants. ounc member a ma - teen seconded the motion. Lou Parker requested that the Council amend the motion and second to include signa a oroaram which wou ___be. submitted to the Town for approv The Council agre and the motion was so amended. There was general discussion regarding improvements in Lionshead prior to the vote. Mayor Slifer called for a vote which was as follows: Councilmembers voting in favor of the motion were: William Wilto; Robert Ruder; and Paula Palmateer. Those Councilmembers voting no were: Tom Steinberg; John Donovan; William Heimbach and Rod Slifer. The motion was defeated. There was further discussion between Mr. Selby and the Council regarding what information might be helpful regarding the solving of the problems existing with the present proposal, toward resubmittal of the project at some future date. Councilmember Ruder moved to reconsider the previous motion; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. The Council will re- consider the Landmark question. Councilmember Donovan then moved to table the parking and setback variance requests until the first meeting of the Council in Feb- ruary, which will be February 7th, 1978. Councilmember Ruder seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried. The Landmark requests for variances ill be heard again on February 7, 1978. Mayor Slifer then introduced the next item on the agenda, consideration of a request from The'Printery for amendment of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a real estate office and sign shop on their premises. Mayor SW6r stepped down from the Council table due to possible conflict of interest in the question. Mayor Pro Tem Donovan then introduced Diana Toughill who explained the r nest. Lou Parker, owner of the Printery covered the background regarding the leasing of space on his premises, stating that two years ago the conditional use permit was originally granted to the Printery to allow Dale McCall to operate an office in the building. Mr. Parker was under the impression that a conditional use permit was needed, or had to be regranted each time the tenant changed in that space. Jf� further stated that there were two new tenants in the building; a sign shop and real estate office. Mayor ProTem Donovan stated that he sees a difference between types of businesses in that space. There was general discussion between the Council, Ms. Toughill and Mr. Parker regarding the original letter granting the first conditional use permit and regarding parking and traffic questions as they relate to real estate offices and a sign shop as opposed to the type of traffic and parking required for an advertising office. Mayor ProTem Donovan then asked Mr. Parker if he wanted to table the question for further study. Mr. Parker agreed. Councilmember Heimbach then moved to table both questions regarding the sign shop and the real estate office to February 7, 1978 meeting of the Council. Councilmember Wilto seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion carried. 3 Mayor Slifer then resumed his position at the Council table and introduced a letter to Town Manager Minger and the Mayor from Mr. Ordway and Mr. Marshal of Vail Associates regarding the request fron the Town of Vail for Vail Associates to consider not building the North building of the Gondola I project. The letter stated that Vail Associates had taken the matter under advisement. Mr. Ordway then personally requested a letter of support from the Town of Vail to be sent to the Forest Service stating that the Town would be in favor of Vail Associates use of the forest service road for access to the Gondola I project area. There was general discussion regarding maintainence, access and assignment of right -of -way and the right -of -way surrounding the building. Council member Heimbach suggested that the Council direct Town Manager Minger to contact the Forest Service regarding use of the road for Vail Associates with the agreement that Vail Associates would give up access through the village voluntarily. Councilmember Palmateer than moved that the Town would send a letter to Vail Associates and the Forest .. w. «. MINTUES o v a �w..rrrn.ri..r.. .... PAIL TOWN COUNCIL PAGE THREE 17 January, 1978 ATTEST: k071 ql1 Service regarding a permit for VA to use access road and that VA would give up access to the East and South in the Village. Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion. Mr. Ordeay requested that the language of the letter to VA not be binding but that the intent be considered the same. The motion was amended to allow that flexibility. All present voted in favor and the motion passed. Next followed a discussion regarding the Bighorn and Sandstone bus fares. Mayor Slifer stated that a request had been received from the Camera Shop in Vail for the Council to consider making the buses to Bighorn and Sandstone free. There was a general dis- cussion regarding fares and how much was offset by collection. Stan Bernstein, Finance Director, stated that only 1/3 to 1/4 of costs were offset by fares collected. The general consensus of the Council was to remove charges if, in doing so, it would encourage use of buses. There was a discussion regarding publicity of the free bus. The entire council agreed to start immediately with free bus service to those areas effective through the and of the season. Town Manager Terrell Minger then played, for the benefit of Council and the Public at the meeting, an audio tape of the news story which was presented recently on Channel 9 TV in Denver regarding the free shuttle bus system in Vail. The next item on the agenda was a discussion regarding the Horse Drawn Sleigh. Chief of Police Gary Wall reported to Council on the performance of the operator for the two previous weeks. Mr. Cadwell, the operator, stated that he very much wanted to continue operations in Vail and would make every effort to abide by the restrictions for his operation. There was general discussion regarding the operation. The Council agreed that Mr. Minger and Mr. Wall would have the right to revolk license for the operation if infractions occurred. Ms. Toughill requested that a permit be sought for approval of horses within the Town limits. The agreement of the Council was that the operation could continue until further notice unless it is ended due to an infraction of the rules and regulations. Mayor Slifer then noted for information that the Ski Museum and CMC were sponsoring an orientation day on January 27th in the Council Chambers of the Town of Vail municipal building for those who might be interested. In addition, he noted that Mr. Larry Burdick had resigned from the Vail Fire Protection District and the Vail Water and Sanitation District Board of Directors. The Mayor publicly thankgd Mr. Burdick for his many years of service to the Town and the special districts. There was a brief discussion regarding openings on the Planning Commission, the Design Review Board and the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. The public was advised that the pedestrian overpass was now open for use. There being no further business for the Council's attention, Councilmember Donovan moved to adjourn. Councilmember Wilto Seconded the motion, all present voted in favor and the motion carried . • The meeting adjourned at 10:15 pm. ATTEST: k071 ql1 DANA CHRISTOPHER AICKLI Z ^ � Lrz� LI�U L ( S Ll + 120 WEST ALAMEOA AVENUE OENVER •CO. 80223.744.3088 October 29, 1978 Mr. Mark Marcus Vail Building Official Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 • Re: Landmark Commercial Addition Glazing Dear Mark: The above project was issued a building permit in May, 1978, was designed prior to the effective date of the new energy code and was bid and under construction two monthes prior to July, 1978. A change at this date would present particular hardship because of the extensive reuse of existing non - conforming plate glass in the expansion and remodeling. There was a minimal amount of additional heat (electric) required due to the addition because of the small amount of new exterior wall and the addit n of insulation where none originally was installed. Y truly, . ana C. Rickli cc: Jeff Selby Shaw Construction Co. DCR /jr AGREEMENT Agreement made this L-- day of , 1978, by and between the Town of Vail ( "Town "} and Commercial Development Company ( "Landmark "). WHEREAS, Landmark applied to the Town for a parking variance for expansion of the commercial portion of the Landmark Building; and WHEREAS, the Town on February 21, 1978 granted such parking variance; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Town granting such variance the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) Landmark hereby transfers to the Town the sum of Twenty -Six Thousand Dollars ($26,000.00), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. 2) The Town shall use such funds to build public parking areas, or to fund a parking study. In the alternative the Town may require Landmark for a period of up to two years from February 21, 1978, to provide twenty - six parking spaces for the Landmark Commercial expansion. If the Town requires such spaces to be put in, the Town shall simultaneously with such request return the Twenty -Six Thousand Dollars to Landmark. 3) If the Town requires Landmark to put in the parking spaces, Landmark shall have a period of six months in which to comply with the request. Dated the day and year first above written. Attest: LANDMARK COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT JEFFREY B. SELBY (I W P. O. BOX 1528 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 b1_4 June 26, 1978 Mr. Terrell J. Minger Town of Vail P.O. Box 100 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Terry: As you requested at the Town Council meeting of June 20, 1978, I will remove the construction fence along the west Lionshead Mall by no later than July 1, 1978. This fence was erected as a safety and security measure by Shaw Con- struction at the request of the Town of Vail Building Department and was located and then relocated at the direction and approval of the Department of Community Development. After discussing the removal of this construction fence with Shaw Construction we have come to the conclusion that this request is not in the best interest of the general public as it greatly increases the prospect and possibility of an accident. At that meeting I requested a one month delay in moving the fence and you declined stating you wanted it moved immediately. There is no question that a construction fence is unsightly and had it not been for the requirement of keeping a fire lane open, the fence would not have been located in the southern portion of the pedestrian mall. If you are still desirous of our removing the construction fence, then I will have to request that the Town be held liable for any damage, theft or accidents which relate directly to the removal of the fence. If the Town of Vail will not assume this responsibility and liability, then I see no alternative but to leave the fence as it presently exists until such time as we complete the Land- mark addition construction. I will proceed to remove the fence by the end of the week under the assumption that the Town will assume liability of no construction barrier unless I hear from you prior to July 1, 1978. No matter which way you choose to go, we will continue to complete the construction as quickly as possible. r 1y Z ZJ?r y B. Se y JBS /sp r � June 6, 1978 The Vail Town Council Vail, Colorado Councilmembers: fu d This letter is a request for your assistance in bringing about the completion of an agreement about the disposition of the construction fence around the Landmark Building in LionsHead. The construction fence's sudden appearance two weeks ago came as an unexpected shock to many of the businesses at the west end of the LionsHead Mall. It had never been mentioned to any of the shopowners; and needless to say, it caused no small amount of concern to us. There is no real debate about the necessity for a construction fence of some kind to enclose the -work on the Landmark building. It seems a matter of common sense that the public be pro- tected from the potential problems that often arise at a job -site, particularly with the amount of pedestrian traf- fic we hope to have in LionsHead this summer. However, on the day that the fence appeared, many of the shopowners or their representatives spoke with Jeff Selby about the fence and the appearance that is given that the Mall is closed off at the west end. After a lengthy dis- cussion of many options, it was agreed that the fence would be moved into the Mall approximately four feet from its present location. This new location would still allow suf- ficient room for the movement of emergency vehicles and other motorized traffic that required access to the Mall. The agreement included an understanding that the work to move the fence was to begin not later than Friday, June 2. That agreement was confirmed in my conversation with Bill Caswell, construction supervisor for the project, on Tues- day, May 30. It was also agreed that there would be pro- vided appropriate signs of a temporary nature (throughout the time that the fence was in place) indicating that there was open access to all businesses in the west end of the Mall. On the afternoon of the agreement to move the fences, em- ployees of the Town of Vail brought a metal detector to the Mall to locate the pipes under the heated Mall. It was determined that there were no pipes that would impair the movement of the fence to the new location. At that time we assumed that we could expect the fence to be moved p.o. box 460 (303) 476 -2431 vail /lionshead, colorado 81657 on schedule, as agreed. To this date there has been no apparent progress on the movement of the fence. Nor have any of the signs been placed indicating unlimited access to the shops and bus- inesses at the west end of the Mall. We are asking that the appropriate measures be taken by The Town of Vail to see that this fence is moved and the appropriate signs are placed immediately. We will greatly appreciate your efforts toward this end. Sincerely, SUNRISE AT VAIL, LTD. Larry= Olsen Office Manager CC: Timberline Properties Mountain High Sports Sunbird Lodge Hansel & Gretel Restaurant Sundance Saloon Meadowlark Only Owls Jeff Selby Bill Wilto JEFFREY B. SELBY P. O. BOX 1828 VAIL, COLORADO 81887 (� April 25, 1978 r i Mr. Allen Gerstenberger Town of Vail P.O. Box 100 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Allen: I was surprised to receive today a bill from the Town of Vail for "Landscape Architectural Services by Royston, Hanamoto, Beck and Abey" in the amount of $174.71. Apparently, this is a bill for meeting with Eldon Beck concerning the Landmark Commercial Addition. The reason I am surprised is that I was never informed that I was responsible for the payment of Eldon Beck's review of our project. It was the Town's request that I meet with Eldon in the first place and consequently, I thought it was at their expense. Had I known I was paying Eldon's bill, in no way would that much time have been spent. Another reason I am surprised is the amount of time which was spent by Eldon on our project. I am quite certain that we met for considerably less time than three and one half hours. I have tremendous respect for Eldon Beck and feel he has done an excellent job for the Town of Vail, but I intend to be very careful in the future when meet- ing with Eldon, as I do not feel this bill fairly represents the services I received. In the future, I think it would behoove you to make it absolutely clear that the applicant is paying the services, even if the review is being requested by the Town. With this aside, I would like to thank you and the Department of Community Development for its support of the Landmark Commercial Addition and all the suggestions which helped make the project better. Y Yey ly, . S elby JBS /sp cc: Diana Toughill IOWA box 100 department of community development vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 April 5, 1978 Mr. Jeffery B. Selby Box 1528 Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Jeff: This letter is to confirm that the proposed Landmark Commercial Addition is located in both the Fire Protection and Water and Sanitation Districts of the Town of Vail. Also, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required by the Town of Vail for the proposed project. Additionally, the construction and operations of the proposed project are not in controvention of and do not violate any environmental or similar rules, regulations or ordinances of the Town of Vail. If you have any questions, or need further information, please feel free to contact me. Smil DST /di TOWN VA I L BUILDING /�l�/'� PLUMBING TYPE OF OCCUPANCY AMOUNT EXITS RED. TOTAL FLOOR AREA Z BUILDING PERMIT NAME Z A A A M ARX , CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w a MECHANICAL - Z 3 ELECTRICAL 3 NEW 1 1 ALTERATION ADDITION WREPAIR 1 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO Q OTHER CITY PH. -- Z • JOB NAME F COVERED * DATE OF APPLICATION i A/ 19 1 IL- TOT 7. 1/j SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA NAME Z A A A M ARX , CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w Z 3 MAIL ADDRESS Q NEW 1 1 ALTERATION ADDITION WREPAIR 1 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY PH. -- Z USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED cO NAMES SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. �, Q OFF ST. PARKING MAIL ADDRESS 5 NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS F V OFF ST. LOADING F e 9- I 2 U ~ CITY ✓ PH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS IRI ILI w NAME CONDO. ODGE SIDE F = MAIL ADDRESS V P S SO. FT. COMMERCIAL EAR DATE ¢ OO low IF TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER ( 1 LRCEN&B 644C 1 1 UNIT 1 1 •her rvAF l,1S x LOT BLK FILING r COVERING I vVi O TRACT (� ,(/ EXT. WALLS ROOF APPLICATION �" INT. WALLS (�/�, FEES ACCEPTED 1. TYPE OFCONSTRUCTION14�n III IV V 1 HR BUILDING PERMIT O SPECIFIED YES NO 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP AOC D E F G H I J PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK E_ DIVISION 1 2 3 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS a ✓� WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL APPROVAL ✓ 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER PERMIT $� GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION �, TOTAL �_ OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IHE T[HAV C C Y� SOIL TEST ✓ READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT TH i ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY ^ / SURVEY ' WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS RDIN BUILDING CONSTRU ION. • SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER tM MmbrYNail i TUR OF OWNER OR CONT CTOR M DATE OF MEETING: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD March 9 , 1978 MEMBERS PRESENT: LOU PARKER BILL BISHOP RON TODD ABE SHAPIRO E SUBJECT: Landmark- Commercial Addition LOT BLOCK , FILING ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTICN VOTE: FOR: SECONDED BY: AGAINST: ABSTENTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: VF 14F I_ IL PvS L V A- A. C3I l I � t 4i oW D o box 100 vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 department of community development August 10, 1979 RE: lot Block Filing Enclosed you will find a Conditional Certificates of Occupancy which was issued to you earlier this year with the understanding that certain requirements be completed within a given time period. Our records in- dicate that your completion date has been passed by without any word from you concerning your obligation. We would appreciate a response from you by August 24 letting us know when your landscaping and paving will be completed. We feel it is necessary to know when these obligations will be fulfilled in that your Certificate of Occupancy was only Conditional. If we fail to hear from you by the above date, it will be necessary to take further action as is outlined in the Uniform Building Code which was adopted by City Ordinance #36. Steve Patterson Chief Building Official W • lowl • Vail Lionshead Building Permit #144 -7s box 100 department of community development vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 April 25, 1979 Landmark Commercial Development Company Box 1528 Vail, CO 81657 Gentlemen, This Conditional Certificate of Occupancy will be issued on Landmark Commercial Addition with the understanding that all landscaping and paving be completed by July 1, 1979. If these items are not completed, the Town Building Official may cause this to be completed at your expense. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appre- ciated. If there are any further questions, please contact me. I have read and understand the above condition for Conditional Certificate of Occupancy. Dfa W. Marchus, ",3uilding Official Date SEAL Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of MOW My 'A CVV\ GTARY PUBLIC BUILDING TOWN OF V A I L Z PLUMBING BUILDING PERMIT Q MECHA J ELECTRICAL � J Q JOB NAME, /�(/ OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 11 -11 9 19 TOTAL TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS RED. II T OTAL FLOOR AREA cc NAME 7 CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA y� MAIL ADDRESS I .;/ry NEW () ALTERATION (TADDITION ( 1 REPAIR ( 1 w Z r FLOOR AREA RATIO CITY ts2 H USE OF BUILDING ° COVERED UNCOVERED O NAME L SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. OFF ST. PARKING F Z Q MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O CC O h- CITY PH, NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS w NAME .-- CONDO. LODGE ^ SIDE IRl ILI F = MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE ¢ Q CITY PH. TYPE OF HEAT WATER 1 ) FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 J 6 LOT BLK FILING COVERING W W J O TRAC EXT. WALLS ROOF APPLICATION INT. WALLS FEES ACCEPTED 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 II 111 IV V I HR BUILDING PERMIT S P E C I F I E D YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES LAN CFf'ECK 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J DIVISION 1 2 3 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL PPRQI✓AL 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER PERMIT GENERAL D SCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION Y TOTAL OCCUPANCY SEPARATION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE 1A llt4r / SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGA RDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER thoprin"Neil SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT JOB NAME DATE OF APPLICATION i `� 19 ROOF J a vVi LOT BLK FILING P W W -I O TRACT 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H DIVISION 1 2 3 4 3. USE ZONE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLAN NUMBER BUILDING NAME PLUMBING cr USE OF BUILDING S P E C I F I E D W Q Z 3 MAIL ADDRESS CITY L. p AREA SEPARATION O ® 00 NAME R MAIL ADDRESS the pd.tM /.ail F Z Q O oC CONDO. U ~ CITY P SIDE w NAME (L) t- REAR = MAIL ADDRESS TYPE OF HEAT WATER ( ) FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 V CITY PH. Q ROOF J a vVi LOT BLK FILING P W W -I O TRACT 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H DIVISION 1 2 3 4 3. USE ZONE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLAN NUMBER BUILDING Z PLUMBING 0 USE OF BUILDING S P E C I F I E D MECHA Q DRY STANDPIPE COMB. STANDPIPE SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE AREA SEPARATION ELECTRICAL Q SURVEY SPECIAL INSPECTOR NO. OF LIVING UNITS the pd.tM /.ail OTHER TOTAL ROOF J a vVi LOT BLK FILING P W W -I O TRACT 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H DIVISION 1 2 3 4 3. USE ZONE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK PLAN NUMBER 1 HR I J COVERING EXT. WALLS INT. WALLS USE OF BUILDING S P E C I F I E D FIRE SPRINKLERS WET STANDPIPE DRY STANDPIPE COMB. STANDPIPE SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE AREA SEPARATION OCCUPANCY SEPARATION SOIL TEST SURVEY SPECIAL INSPECTOR NO. OF LIVING UNITS the pd.tM /.ail FRONT CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA NEW I) ALTERATION ( 1 ADDITION 1 ) REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO USE OF BUILDING SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. OFF ST. PARKING NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS CONDO. LODGE SIDE (R) (L) SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE TYPE OF HEAT WATER ( ) FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REG. TOTAL FLOOR AREA COVERED I UNCOVERED APPLICATION ACC PT D L PLAN CHECK FEES BUILDING P YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT OTHER PERMIT # U 0 TOTAL 1 4 �1 / // n �� J I HEREB OWLEDGE THAT I IiA READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT T� ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS RE RDIN(: CONSTRUCTION. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR DATE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: BILL RUOFF LOU PARKER BILL BISHOP RON TODD ABE SHAPIRO SUBJECT: LOT BLOCK , FILING ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION. T /., o SECONDED BY: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: ABSTENTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 3 f _ ,� ,i �..._. (77x i . 1 F 4 i i i • Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N2 359 Job Z9GteYAC41 - - - - -- Date of Application ..._.. ...... --------------------- 19.17 ........... .. Electrical Contractor ---------- ldel,) ..... ..................... ........... Applicant - -• .. - - -..4 Siena e Building Valuation $ ---------------------------- Electrical Valuation $... f� � ........ Permit Fee $.......`D' .......... Inspection Fee $...... . . ........ Total Fee ........... DatePaid ........................ •...............•.•....•. Received ................................................. APPROVALS .....................................•. .. •................••. ...•. ...................................... k eck Date . . . . ............... .... --- - ---- 77 Building Official Da THIS FORM S T BE POSTED ON JOB SITE D G CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOME IMQUMM FOR INSPECTIONS THE R. F. HGERKEL DO., DENVER 710453 t_ TOWN OF VA I L J w w BUILDING BUILDING PERMIT z O PLUMBING MECHA ELECTRICAL w Q Q JOB NAME > OTHER O NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS DATE OF APPLICATION 19 CITY -- EASEMENTS CONDO. LODGE - SIDE _Lq) TOTAL PH. OF OCCUPANCY I A MOUNT I EXITS RED. J w w NAME CLASS OF WORK ¢ TOTAL LOT AREA NEW ( ALTERATION ADDITION( ) REPAIR( 1 w USE OF BUILDING Z MAIL ADDRESS � 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V [I MR� O NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOAD CITY -- EASEMENTS CONDO. LODGE - SIDE _Lq) (L) O NAME - H TYPE OF HEAT Z Q MAIL ADDRESS CLEAN UP DEPOSIT X V ~ CITY SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE AREA SEPARATION OTHE °� PERMIT # T OT U NAME X w F- x k = MAIL ADDRESS I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CO CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY U WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE ��✓ LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. ^ SPECIAL INSPECTOR V Q CITY PH. OF OCCUPANCY I A MOUNT I EXITS RED. DATE J w w TOTAL FLOOR AREA CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA NEW ( ALTERATION ADDITION( ) REPAIR( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO USE OF BUILDING APPLIC SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT � 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V [I MR� O FF ST. PARKING NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOAD NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT -- EASEMENTS CONDO. LODGE - SIDE _Lq) (L) FIRE SPRINKLERS WET STANDPIPE DRY STANDPIPE SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR - ? 3. USE ZONE TYPE OF HEAT V WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR ( 1 E LEC ( 1 UNIT DATE COVERED I UNCOVERED J w w LOT BLK FILING COVERING EXT. WALLS ROOF O TRACT INT. WALLS APPLIC � 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V [I MR� FEES CCE P ED �`.�1 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E O G H I J DIVISION 1 2 3 4 BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEES P AN CH K PLUMBING MECHANICAL RO ELECTRICAL S P E C I F I E D YES NO FIRE SPRINKLERS WET STANDPIPE DRY STANDPIPE ? 3. USE ZONE COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT X SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE AREA SEPARATION OTHE °� PERMIT # T OT GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK X OCCUPANCY SEPARATION SOIL TEST SURVEY x k • I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CO CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE ��✓ LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. ^ SPECIAL INSPECTOR V PLAN NUMBER Iha yrinlaryNail SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR ONTRACTOR COVERED I UNCOVERED COLOnADO INSIGHT December 17, 1977 Members of the Town Council Town of Vail Municipal Building Vail, Colorado Sirs, We have gone over the proposed expansion of the Landmark commercial space and feel that such-an addition would be of real benefit to the LionsHead area. As shop managers of Colorado Insight, we can appreciate the need for additional commercial space in LionsHead. It is also obvious that the buildings are too far apart and this would help correct the problem. Sincerely yours, John Appleby �� a Aane West /jsm J� a_ PO BOX 1426, VAIL, COLD 81657 THI)EE LOCNIONS • VAIL 21 (30 476-3689 • LANDMAMIJ 476 -4875 • LODGE 476 -4865 P.O. Box 836 Vail. Colorado 81667 (303)476 -4886 i/ "The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things: of shoes and ships and sealing wax: Of Cabbages and Kings." The General Store Box 225 Vail, Colorado 81657 December 19, 1977 Landmark Commercial Development Company Box 1528 Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Sirs, We have examined the proposed addition to the Landmark building and we totally support said design. Sincerely yours Ron Toth Manager, The General Store RT/ j sm coLof�ADO INSIGHT December 19, 1977 Landmark Commercial Development Company Box 1528 Vail, Colorado 81657 Sirs, We have examined the proposed addition to the Landmark building and we totally support said design. Sincerely, John Appleby Manager, Colorado Insight JH /jsm PO BOX 1426, VAIL, COLD 81657 TH - EE LOCATIONS - VA L 21(303) 476 -3659 - LANDM Afilj 476 -4875 LODGE 476 -4565 e n / , -_-______--___�--_____-_-_--___--_-+_----____--__-_-_----_-__� �� � ___�- ___-__-- w o 11 ��' �[ , LlN�L �Y {/i �V I v Motion by G.W. Breuer 2nd by Rex Richardson Be it resolved that the Board of Managers* made a motion to approve the proposed addition to the Landmark -Vail Commercial space as designed by Dana Rickli subject to the following conditions: I "' 1. The general common elements adjacent to the existing c9mmercial area (land only of approx- imately 5900 square feet) will be leased to the principals'of the Landmark Commercial Development Company for a term of 99 years at a rental equal to 8$ of the land value as determined on an annual basis. Thg first year land value is mutually Agrebd to be 55,000 and will be adjusted annually Wpwatd bag6d upon increases in the Consumer Price Indek (1987 = 100) published by the Bureau of tabor Statistics. 4 2. Landmark Commercial Development Company agrees to pay an additional 6.69% of the condominium associatioh budget in equal monthly payments. 3. Landmark.Commercial Development Company agrees to pay casts of approval for the addition and any and all expenses and tap fees which the associati6h might incur. The improvement costs of the addition will be the full responsibility of Landmark Commercial Development Company. 4. The date of this lease agreement will be effective at such time that the Construction commences. 5. Landmark Commercial Development Company agrees at their expense to install the following: a. Heating coils in all newly installed side- walk areas. b. Building identification sign and directory. C. Cover the existing stairs and walkway be- tween the tower and townhouse from the gar- age to the new addition. d. The roof of second floor addition on south west corner will be finished in built up tar roof with redwood decking. 6. In the event that all of the principals of the Landmark Commercial Development Company sell all of their interest in the commercial and office condominium and units of Landmark -Vail building, the appraised value of the land beneath the new addition will be subject to a new appraisal of the market value plus $2 /sq. ft. which will be- come the new basis for determining the annual rental of the general common elements. In no event will this new appraisal cause the annual rental to fall below minimal rental paid for the previous year. The Board of Directds hereby approve and support the proposed addition subject to approval by the members of the Association and contingent on a formal lease agreement. c� C G. W.,�Breuer Rex i.c arason ��- - -�.'} ams Anarews PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Jeffrey B. Selby, representing Landmark Commercial Development Co., has applied for a variance from the provisions of Sections 18.26.070, required setbacks and 18.26.150, parking and loading of the Municipal Code for the Town of Vail in order to allow a 7,000 sq. ft. addition to the Landmark Building located on a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing. Application has been made in accord with Chapter 18.62 of the Municipal Code. A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code on December 13, 1977, at 3:00 P.M. before the Town of Vail Planning Commission. Said hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal Building. TOWN OF VAIL DEPA 1ENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v� A I Di'ana S. Toughill Zoning Administrator Published in the Vail Trail November 25, 1977. PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) d• solemnly swear that I am the V3L tt� of THE VAIL TRAIL; that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of rado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been ished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as second -class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of I consecutive insertions; and that the first pubication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 0S A.D. 19 and that the last publication pf said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated A.D. 197 O tness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this _ day of A.D. 19 /", Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary pu lic in nd fort County of Eagle, State of Colorado, this day of �-� D. 19-Z- My Commission expires My Commission expires May 16, 1981 Notary P ublii 19 Public Notice NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Jeffrey B. Selby, representing LADaMark Commercial Development Company, applied for a variance from the provisions of Sections 18.26.070, required setbacks and 18.26.150, parking and loading of the Municipal Code for the Town of Vail in order to allow a 7,000 sq. ft. addition to the Landmark Building located on a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail LionsHead 3rd Filing. Application has been made in accord with Chapter 18.62 of the Municipal Code. A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code on December 13, 1977, at 3:00 P.M. before the Town of Vail Planning Commission. Said hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal Building. TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Diana S. Toughill Zoning Administrator Published In The Vail Trail on November 2S, 1477. y 1 • • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1977 RE: LANDMA UILDING REQUEST FOR PARKING VARIANCE AND SETBACK VARIANCE. Application has been made by Jay Peterson, representing Landmark Commercial Development Company, for a,26 car parking variance and a setback variance in order to permit a 7093 square foot addition to the existing Landmark commercial space. Following is a summary of proposed additions and parking requirements: The applicant can provide the required parking on site and the 500 covered parking requirement can be met by existing underground parking in excess of that required by ordinance (85% of parking is covered). Parking utilization statistics indicate that an average of only 52o of the existing parking is being used; this leaves approximately 43 spaces which have not been needed to serve the existing building. Kostas Taverena Le Cadeau Colorado Insight Cabbage & Kings New Shop General Store Square Feet 754.0 1,308.0 2,262.5 541.5 380.0 1,847.5 7,093.5 Parking Required 5.03 4.36 7.54 1.80 1.27 6.16 26.16 or 26 Based on these statistics, we recommend that the applicant not be required to provide the 26 spaces, but that the Town reserve the right to require the construction of the 26 spaces in the future if it is determined by the Planning Commission they are necessary based on parking surveys conducted by the Town. We feel it would be better to retain existing landscaping rather than require unneccessary asphalt. The applicant has also requested a setback variance on the south, west, and east sides of the proposed building. Required setbacks are 28' which is due to the height of the existing building (approximately 70'). Existing setbacks are West -30 East -23 and South -49 proposed setbacks are West -21 East -10 and South -151. PAGE 2 0 Landmark Parking Variance • All other.zoning requirements have been met. The addition makes the building more conforming in that it provides offsets in a 120' long, unbroken wall. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS (SECTION 18.62.060) 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. After a thorough review of the Lionshead area, it is our conclusion that a comparable addition is not possible on any other building. The Department of Community Development is preparing legislation which will recommend th4t pedestrian scale additions be allowed in CC2 to enable retail shops to expand toward the pedestrian mall. The proposed addition is surrounded on three sides by pedestrian mall. We then feel we can justify removal of parking for aesthetic reasons to obtain mare landscaping. There have been no parking variances granted in the Lionshead area except those removed to allow more landscaping. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege. Strict interpretation of the ordinance would not allow the proposed building addition on the site. A number of parking variances have been granted in Lionshead (Vail International, Sunbird, Montaneros, Lodge at Lionshead, Studio in the Rockies) to allow for more landscaping. In every case, the parking could be provided but landscaping was more desirable in meeting the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Every building in Lionshead developed prior to 1974 is within 15' of their property line. The Sunbird Lodge, located directly south of the proposed addition received a variance for zero setbacks on the north, east and west property lines and Montaneros on the west was also granted a zero setback on the north side. There appears to be no adverse impact created by the proposed addition as it is approximately 50' from its nearest neighbor. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. A positive impact could be created pertaining to distribution of population. The Lionshead area is in critical need of commercial activity to draw people through the mall system and create interest in the area. We foresee no adverse impacts on other factors. PAGE 3 Landmark Parking Var0ce • FINDINGS- The Planning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsiste.nt with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. SEE ITEMS 1 AND 2 UNDER CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS. Grant of the parking and setback variance request is consistent with treatment of other sites in the area. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. We feel the project would have a very positive impact on the neighborhood and would not be detrimental to any other properties in the vicinity. It begins to create pedestrian scale retail space which we feel is badly needed to make Lionshead work better. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this ordiance. The setback regulations are designed to guarantee adequate separation between buildings and adequate open space - both of these intents have been met. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. SEE ITEMS 1 AND 2 UNDER CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS. The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the requested variances with the condition that the 26 parking spaces be provided if parking survey statistics indicate they are necessary at any time in the future. APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE And /Or CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Ordinance No. 8 (Series of 1973) Publication I i cat i on Date November 26, 1977 qpp I i catl on Date November 21 1977 Hearing Date December 13, 1977 Hearing Fee Final Decision date for Town Council >lecember 20, 1977 Landmark Commercial Development Co. of Box 1528 I ( Jeff Selby (Address) (Applicant Vail Phone 476 -0522 Colorado (City) (State) do hereby request permission to appear before the Vail Planning Commission to request the following: (X ) Variance from Article 9 ,tSoection 9.6 ( ) Zoning Change from (X ) Parking Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit 'o allow i n CC 2 Zone. A portion of 1 For the following described property: Lot /tract_, Block F i l i n g Number Vail /Lionshead Third Filin ose and i ntent o f th i s app I i cation To obtain a Clearly state p ur p f *i,° minimum side set backs to allow for a 10 foot side setback variance rom along the east erty line and a 15 foot side setback along the south line. A parking variance is also commercial in the Lar sted i n order to n square feet. sti IV h a t d o y o u f e e l is the b a s i s for o the hardship In this residential condominium tower which variance is required in this case due t f is seven stories hi h. n is being proposed osed to a portion of It is our belief that the standard setback r u r 10 feet should be adaquate since the addition P variance e requested arking the c omplex whichnl o two stores high the pal c ould as �oland- that the area which would be used for sca in It is the a licants firm be lief asil t hat accommodate the n the building as the existing parking can e y and t enants. Continual review of heturo oseasaddition.uiThe i provements, additional parking is needed for t p P , are intended to bring the commer cia sho variance except a small require the s parking' etback and portion in Landmark to the LionsHead Mal sho s l and f businessesP ace will be used to expand existing P PrIWAD AXTV By i ,� ,� i :i ,� 3 �� �. �.,- `_�. ��r a ...� .3R:Ac ... ::a...J. MINUTES as "kiGULAR MEETING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 20 DECEMBER, 1977 0 � 10 The Regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was convened in joint session with the Vail Water and Sanitation District Board of Directors at 7:30 pm, Tuesday, December 20, 1977. miyor Rodney .Slifer and the following council members were present: Paula Palmateer John Donovan Thomas Steinberg Robert Ruder William Wilto William Heimbach Also present were Town Manager, Terrell J. Minger; Town Attorney, Larry Rider; Town Director of Public Works, Kent Rose and members of the board of the Vail Water and Sanitation District. The joint session was called to order by Mayor Slifer who introduced Kent Rose to present the background and status of the proposed new waste water treatment plant. Following general discussion, the joint session was closed. Iie public hearing regarding the Mall Act was then opened for discussion. Since there were ,io presenters at this meeting, the public hearing was closed, and the next public hearing for discussion of the Mall Act was set for February 14, 1978. Councilmember Wilto moved to postpone the public hearing to that date; Councilmember Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried.. Next on the agenda for council consideration was Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1977, which had been continued from the December 6, 1977 regular meeting of the council. Ordinance No. 29 was introduced on first reading, concerning the rezoning of a portion of Vail Run from VC to SDDS. Councilmember Ruder suggested a change in wording to clarify. section 8 paragraph B. Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator explained.that the change would be made and covered what arrangements had been made regarding density and parking since the first presentation of the proposed ordinance. There being no further discussion, Councilmember Heimbach moved to approve Ordinance No. 29 on first reading; Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion; voting in favor were councilmembers Palmateer; Steinberg; Ruder; Wilto and Heimbach. Voting no was Councilman Donovan. The motion passed. Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1977 was introduced on second reading. Mayor Slifer explained that the ordinance was regarding the $2,350,000 general obligation bonds of the Town of Vail, and authorizes the sale of same. There being no discussion, Councilmember Heimbach moved to approve Ordinance No. 31 on second reading and to publish the ordinance by title only. Councilmember Wilto seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 32, Series was introduced on second reading, regarding the rezoning of the North Pulis property from Eagle County "Resource" District to the Town of Vail "Public Use" ,strict zoning. There being no discussion, Councilmember Steinberg moved to approve the ordinance; Councilmember Ruder seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1977, was introduced on second reading, making a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $17,000 from the Rural Transportation Demonstration Program Fund. Mayor Slifer asked for questions and comments from Council and the public. There was no discussion. Councilmember Ruder moved to approve the ordinance on second reading; Council member Wilto seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1977 was introduced on second reading, amending Section 18.52.170 of the Vail Municipal Code to allow for the leasing of private parking spaces. Mayor Slifer asked for questions and comments from the Council and Public. Diana Toughill stated that a change had been made and that the ordinance would be amended to add "Provides sufficient Employee Parking" under section B -1 Councilmember Palmateer moved to approve the ordinance as amended, and that it be published in full; Councilmember Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1977, was introduced on second reading, being the Annual Appropriation Ordinance for the 1978 Budget and Financial Plan of the Town of Vail. Mayor Slifer asked for questions and comments from the Council and the Public. Stan Bernstein Stated that the Capital Improvements schedule which has been reviewed by the Council had .been revised and that copies of that schedule were available to public, and that Council MINUTES • • PAGE TWO REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 20, 1977 had also seen the revised schedule. There being no further discussion, Councilmember Steinberg moved approve the ordinance on second reading; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Next item on the agenda for Council consideration was a presentation by the Lionsridge- Sandstone Neighborhood Organization-regarding their request for funding for open space acquisition. Mayor Slifer read a letter from the organization, and there was general comment from several members of the neighborhood who were present. The Neighborhood Organization is requesting assistance from the Town of Vail for the purchase of parcels B -4 and B -5 in the Lionsridge area so they might be preserved as open space for the entire Lionsridge neighborhood. Mayor Slifer, speaking for the Council, stated that the Council would take the matter under consideration and that more discussions would be taking place regarding the request, and that interested parties were welcome to attend work sessions to discuss. Next on the agenda was a discussion regarding somking in public meetings. Councilmember Palmateer suggested that the Council impose a somking ban during Public meetings and work sessions of the Vail Town Council, with a break during the meeting for those who wish to smoke. A brief, but general discussion followed. Councilmember Palmateer then moved to enact the no- smoking ban; Councilmember Wilto seconded the motion; Those voting yes were: Paimateer,'W Steinberg, Ruder and Slifer. Councilmember Donovan voted no and Council member Heimbach abstained. The motion carried. There will be no smoking in the public meetings of the Vail Town Council or in the work session meetings. There will be a break during meetings those who wish to smoke to step outside and do so. The next item for discussion was the proposed Vendor's Fee. At the previous meeting of the Council, Charles Crowley , a village businessman, had requested that the council consider inacting a vendor's fee for the Town of Vail. Stan Bernstein had, since that time, prepared a memo for the Council outlining the implications of enacting such a fee. He explained the details to the Councilmembers. There was general discussion among the Council and consensus was that the Council was unanimously opposed to such a fee, following a verbal poll of the Council by Mayor Slifer. The matter was closed for this time. Following that, Mayor Slifer introduced Diana Toughill who explained the request from Vail Athletic Club for an amendment to the parking variance previously granted to the Club which would allow for Employee housing. Three parking spaces are involved. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 in favor of granting the request. Ms Toughill explained that there would be a contract signed between the Town of Vail and the Vail Club restricting the use of the space and requiring that parking be provided on the Mcalister property. There being no further discussion; Councilmember Steinberg moved to approve the amendment to the variance; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. �j Mayor Slifer then introduced Jeff Selby from the Landmark development who explained that they were asking for a setback and parking variance to allow for the addition of 7,000 plus feet of commercial feet to the lower floor of the Landmark building. There was general discussion and.some feeling that there were yet many unanswered questions. Councilmember Donovan moved to table the request for a maximum of 21 days. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Heimbach; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Since no Regular meeting of the Town Council will take place after the January 3rd meeting, in time for the request to be heard within the 21 day period, the request will be heard again at the January 3,1978 meeting. Town-Manager Terrell Minger reported that he will be meeting with Mr. Don Walker, regarding the Lionsridge questions and that Mr. Walker would be meeting with the Town Council on January 3, 1978 regarding the purchase of other openspace lands at the regular work sessic and that all interested parties are invited to attend. There being no further matters for the Council attention; Councilmember Donovan moved to adjourn. Councilmember Steinberg seconded the moti All present voted in favor and the meeting adjourned at 11:00 PM. ATTEST: Mayor Town Clerk MINTUES � • REGULAR MEETING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 3 JANUARY, 1978 The regular meeting of the Town of Vail Council was convened at 7:40 P.M., on Tuesday, January 3, 1978. Present were Mayor Rodney Slifer and the following members of the Vail Town Council: Paula Palmateer John Donovan Thomas Steinberg William Heimbach William Wilto Councilmember Ruder was absent. Also present were Town Manager Terrell J. Minger and Town Attorney Lawrence Rider. Mayor Slifer introduced Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1977, rezoning a portion of Vail Run from Rc to SDD5, on second reading. He then introduced Zoning Administrator, Diana Toughill who explained that there had been a slight change in Section 8, paragraph B, to clarify language. There were no comments or questions from either the Council or the Floor, and Councilman Heimbach moved to approve Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1977 on second reading with the amendment in language to Section 8 -B. Councilmen Donovan and Steinberg voted "no ". Councilmembers Palmateer, Heimbach, and Wilto voted in favor, and the motion carried. Next item on the agenda was a special presentation of service awards to members of the Planning Commission and Design Review Board who had completed terms of service. Mayor Slifer introduced former Mayor Dobson who thanked those who had served so faithfully and diligently and awarded each of them a Slate placque with their names engraved with service dates. Those receiving rlacques were: Robert Clark; Gordon Pierce; Dave Sage; Jen Wright; Dave Gorsuch; Jim Slevin; Hans Weibel; Bill Hanlon; Jack Fritzlen; Dan Corcoran; Bill Heimbach; and Bill Wilto; all of whom served on the Planning Commission. Carol Kramer was awarded a placque for her service on the Design Review Board. Mayor Slifer then awarded an identical placque to John Dobson for his long years of service on the Town Council. Mayor Slifer then introduced Diana Toughill who explained that this was the request from Landmark which had been postponed from the December 20, 1977; meeting regarding setback and parking variances for the proposed-Landmark addition. Jeff Selby, representing Landmark, then requested the council to table the p arki n g va riances request for two weeks and advised council that some modificati no s had been made since a first request for set- back variances at the last council meeting. He covered the revisions and explained that he believed that the addition to the building would greatly enhance the building and create a warmer feeling in the Lionshead mall area around the stairs. Ms. Toughill added that the Planning Commission had voted 6 to 1 in favor of granting the variances. Mayor Slifer then asked for questions or comments from the Council and Audience. Ms. Linda Bird, from Sunrise in Lionshead stated that she had no real objections to the project, except that she felt that further construction in Lionshead would disrupt the summer business and that Lionshead needed a good, viable summer. Mr. Selby stated that he too was interested in the area having a good summer and felt that this project would not interefere with the mall area and would ultimately enhance the area. Mr. Edward L. Volpe, representing Kostas Taverna, a business in the Landmark building, stated that his client was opposed to the project totally and claims that the project. .would be materially injurous to his client. Further stating that the view would be destroyed and that the additions were being planned without the approval of the tennants. 'Mr. Tom Antio, representing LaCadequ Boutique, stated that he has no real interest in the ;project other than his objection to the construction in the area, which he feels would be aterially injurous to his business. Attorney Jay Peterson, speaking for Landmark, stated that they would agree to build only one level of the proposed addition, if that would be fair compromise for those objecting. Mr. Volpe replied that since the application to Council was in the form of two - storys then he would not consider compromising until the formal application was revised. Councilmember Donovan asked for clarification of the parking variance request postponement. Larry Rider stated that the Council cannot go beyond 21 days, but a client could waive the 21 day limit and specifically ask for a longer delay for hearing. Councilmember Donovan then suggested to Mr. Selby that he consider asking for a longer postponement since there were many things yet unknown about the project and its implications. Councilmembers Steinberg and Palmateer expressed concern about the need for more study and questioning before council makes any decision. Town Attorney Larry Rider cautioned and advised the council that they must consider only the quesion of the variance request in terms of the REGULAR MEETING `ANUARY 3, 1978 0 number of feet, not in terms of the economic considerations which are outside the parameters of what is described in the ordinances as criteria for consideration of variance requests. Mayor slifer stated, for the record that the Town Council has seen the site. There was a brief discussion between Mr. Selby and some tennants regarding who in the building supported the project. Mayor Slifer reminded the Council that they may con- ; sider the variance only in terms.of what the definitions are described in the ordinances. He then asked for a motion to table the requests - Jeff Selby officially requested such tableing; Councilman Donovan moved to table the requests for two weeks until the meeting of January 17, 1978, and asked for a revised model of the project with a moveable second floor to show what the relative differences would be. "Councilmember Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Next item on the agenda was a request for final approval for the final plat of Glen Lyon. Mayor Slifer introduced Andy Norris, speaking for the project outlined the entire development briefly. Councilmember Palmateer asked how many people will be added by this project; Mr. Norris estimates about 130 living units. Palmateer then asked about parking questions and Mr. Norris suggested that perhaps extension of the shuttle bus system could be justified. There was a brief discussion regarding dedication of green space /open space lands being dedicated to the Town of Vail by this developer. Councilmember Donovan then reminded the Council and the citizens that this project adds another 1,000 people to the valley and that growth management must be implemented. He feels that no one seems to want to tackle the problem - but that it is certainly time to do so. There was a brief general discussion regarding the growth management process. Following that, Mayor Slifer asked for a Motion, which Larry Rider composed. The first motion was to accept the dedication of the stream tract i'n the project, moved by Councilmember Donovan and seconded by Councilmember Steinberg. All present voted in favor and the motion carried. The second motion was to approve and accept the final plat itself and was made by Council member Wilto, seconded by councilmember Heimbach. All present voted in favor and the motion passed. The third motion was to accept the dedication to the Town of Vail by the developer of tracts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,J and K. The motion was made by Councilmember Steinberg and seconded by councilmember Wilto. All present voted in favor and the motion passed. Mayor Slifer then introduced Ms. Toughilll who explained that Vail Associates was requestini the resubdivision of Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing, (a parcel of land located near Booth Falls) to change zoning from LDMF. Phil Ordway, speaking for Vail Associates stated that it was their feeling that this site should not include more than 4 units. There being no further discussion, Councilmember Donovan moved to approve the resubdivision subject to the rezoning approval on February 2, 1978. Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion, all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Next for discussion and attention of the Council was the matter of the request for assistance to the Town of Vail from the Lionsridge Neighborhood Organization. Mayor Slifer explained the history of the request and stated that Don Walker, consultant was evaluating the questions and that the council was considering the purchase of the land in parcels B -4 and B -5. He further stated that although the parcels were not that important in a valley wide sense, they were important to that particular neighborhood and that the council requested the owners of the condominiums in the neighborhood to circulate and sign a petition stating support of proposals to purchase the land with the town of Vail in a 50 %/50% share of cost. He stated that there were many details to be worked out and that a special district would probably have to be formed. But first, he wanted the petition to be submitted from the property owners in the neighborhood. Larry Rider clarified for the record that bhe buyers of the project would be subject to special district assessments and that everyone should know that when they sign the petition. There was a brief discussion among the council regarding where the funds would come from to pay the Town's share of the purchase price. Stan Bernstein compared it to the handling of the Bighorn street program and stated that he would investigate other means of funding. The mext matter for council discussion was a presentation of the current parking situation and a report of the parking study. Mayor Slifer introduced Allen Gerstenberger, Director of Community Development, who explained the process of the parking study. The mayor then introduced Phil Ordway, Vail Associates, who explained the current status of the restriction being placed on parking in the western most parking lots. Mr. Ordway apologized for some confusion and lack of communication in the process of setting up the new parking rules, and stated that anyone bearing local license plates who attempts to drive into Vail asso- ciates lots during the day carrying less than three people, will be asked to park in the western most areas set aside for employee parking. Anyone carrying more than three people MINUTES • REGULAR MEETING. JANUARY 3, 1978 will be allowed to park . He further stated that he believes created at least 40 more parking spaces for visitors in those that the program is fundamentally a good one and that most of due to poor communications. He further stated that this does Vail Associates' final solution to the problem, but that it i! refined. the restrictions have lionshead lots. He feels the negative feedback is not necessarily represent temporary and will be There was a brief, general discussion amoung the Council and the public regarding parking problems in general, including suggestions from the Council and Vail Associates represen- tatives that more employers and employees be encouraged to use the public transportation available in the valley. Phil Ordway asked in any consideration was being given to long range solutions like possibly special districts for parking, etc., and Terry Minger stated that the council had not necessarily looked at that one but he would be happy to sit down with Ordway to discuss and present to Council.. Mayor Slifer then introduced the next matter of business which was the status of the proposed Gondola I Building expansion. Diana Toughill explained that the new plans submitted to the Town Staff had met a -1 the requirements and that the staff had approved the project as currently submitted . There was a brief discussion as to the consideration of eliminating the East access and moving it to the West. Mr. Ordway stated that Vail Associates was considering that and felt that the Forest Service would probably grant that right tot he Town of Vail, but probably not to Vail Associates, and that Vail Asso- ciates would support a request for same by the Town of Vail. Peter Burnett,.Supervisor of Streets and.koads, cautioned council that buildings be of such design to prevent possible snow overhand and icing. Council noted that the Design review board would be looking at that. There was a brief discussion regarding use of the patio area by Vail Institute and whether or not both buildings must be built. Council member Donovan asked Mr. Ordway to put a price on building only the South building and not the North building . Ordway pointed out that the project had been cut back as much as possible and that they fully intended to build it, however, he would come up with a figure. The final item on the presentations agenda for the meeting was a public discussion of the horse -drawn sleigh. Mayor Slifer introduced Steve Cadwell who operates a horse - drawn sleigh and haywagon. Mr. Cadwell gave 'a brief and entertaining history of his personal experience in handling horses-as a part of his request for permission to maintain horse -drawn rides in the village core. He asked for permission to use gates, park in the core areas and extended hours for services and if it was possible to do forge work and blacksmithing in the core of the village as an attraction. There was a lengthy and detailed discussion between Mr. Cadwell, the Council, Chief of Police, Gary Wall, Pete Burnett and the audience regarding multiple problems and possible solutions which might allow Mr. Cadwell to continue to operate in the village. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilmember Donovan clarified the position of the council as being: 1) he may not operate before 10:00 am, nor between the hours of 3 -5:30 PM, and not after 11:30 pm. 2) The wagon must be checked for safety and the insurance certificate must be received by the Town of Vail. 3) He may drive both directions on Gore Creek Drive, but not east of the Vorlaufernor either South or North on Bridge Street. 4) He must comply with the dog ordinance and the forge & blacksmithing request is denied. 5) He may operate on a trial basis for two weeks only from today. The matter will be discussed again on the 17th of January. Councilman Donovan then moved that all this be agreed upon by the Council. Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion. Councilmember Steinberg voted against and all others present voted in favor. The motion carried. Councilman Heimbach then noted for the record that he wanted the council to move on the growth management programs as soon as possible. Councilmember Donovan requested a meeting in February for the express purpose of discussion of the real estate transfer tax and an election for that question. Councilmember Donovan then moved to adjourn. Councilman Heimbach seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion passed. The meeting adjourned at 10:45 PM. Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk .MINUTES REGULAR MEETING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 17 JANUARY 1978 The regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, was convened at 7:45 PM on Tuesday, January 17, 1978, in the Vail Municipal Building Council Chambers: Mayor Rod'Slifer and the following councilmembers were present: John Donovan Bill Wilto Robert Ruder Bill Heimbach Paula Palmateer Tom Steinberg Others present were: ' Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager Larry Rider, Town Attorney Minutes from the Town Council meetings of December 6, 1977; December 20; 1977; and January 3, 1978 were introduced by Mayor Slifer. Councilmember Wilto moved to approve the minutes; Councilmember Ruder seconded the motion; all.present voted in favor and the motion passed. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1978,commending the State of Colorado Hiqhway Department with regard to the Vail Pass portion of Interstate Highway 70, was introduced and read by Mayor Slifer. The Mayor then commented that he believed the construction project would serve as a model for other highways in the state. He then introduced Mr. Procense from the State Department of Highways who introduced Mr. Ron Marshall and Mr. Matt Smith whom he credited for their assistance on the project. He stated that the expectation was that the highway project would be totally completed by next summer. Town Manager Terry Minger added his comments regarding the commendable project and stated that he and Mr. Procense would be working together to develop a study of the possibility of a traffic signal at the Four -Way Stop and another regarding the possibility of the Town of Vail undertaking the maintainence of Highway Six in the Bighorn area. Councilmember Donovan moved to approve the Resolution; Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1978, adopting the 1977 Supplement to the Vail Municipal Code, was introduced on first reading by Mayor Slifer. There was on discussion from Council or the public. Councilmember Steinberg moved to approve; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1978, rezoning Lot 4, Block 1, Bighorn Third Addition, Lot 27, Block 2, Vail Village Thirteenth Filing, and Lot 3, Block 9, and the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 3, Bighorn Third Addition, was introduced on firse reading by Mayor Slifer. Town of Vail Zoning Administrator, Diana Toughill, explained details of the rezoning requests. There was no discussion or questions from either the Council or the Public. Councilmember. Ruder moved to approve; Councilmember Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed., The next item of business for the Council was a request for setback and parking variances for Landmark. Mayor Slifer asked Larry Rider to explain the situation. Mr. Rider in turn asked Diana Toughill to recap the history of the variance requests. Mr. Rider then clarified the procedural requirements which have been met by the developer and reminded the Council of the criteria for making a decision in this case being the conditions of the variance request only. Mr. Jeff Selby, developer, presented the revised plan for development of the proposed addition. He stated that e parking variance question would be discussed later. r. Vol e, Attorney for Kostas Taverna, a tenant in the Landmark Building, questioned p 0hether it is appropriate for Council to hear Mr. Selby's request. Larry Rider 4dvised Council that they may hear the request for variance pending the outcome of 4etermination of ownership of project and that it was appropriate for the Council to hear Mr. Volpe's argument on behalf of his client. Mr. Volpe continued to say that is client objects to the present plan for the project since it differs from that t ich his client was led to believe would be presented and feels that the unknowns in e present project would materially damage his client. Mr. Jay Peterson, attorney r for Landmark, stated that the project as currently presented to the Council had MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 17 JANUARY, 1978 • PAGOWO the approval of the majority percentage of the Board of Directors. He then went on to point out that the proposed plan was in keeping with the recommend- ations made by the Town ov.Vail and Vail Associates planning staffs. Mr. Selby reinterated that it was difficult to finalize details with tenants until they know what the final project proposal will be, following variance procedures. There was a general discussion between the Councilmembers, Mr. Rider, Mr. Selby, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Volpe regarding conditions under which the variance may or may not be granted. Mayor Slifer then clarified the choices of the Council re- garding the variance requests. Councilmember Wilto then moved to approve the setback variance request with the condition that the variance apply to the first floor only and that the second floor construction be subject to Council approval and the approval of the tenants. Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion. Lou Parker requested that the Council amend the motion and second to include a signage program which would be submitted to the Town for approval. The Council agreed and the motion was so amended. There was general discussion regarding improvements in Lionshead prior to the vote. Mayor Slifer called for a vote which was as follows: Councilmembers voting in favor of the motion were: William Wilto; and Paula Palmateer. Councilmembers voting no were: Tom Steinberg; John Donovan; William Heimbach ; Rod Slifer ; - and Robert Ruder. The motion was defeated. There was further discussion between Mr. Selby and the Council regarding what information might be helpful regarding the solving of the problems existing with the present proposal, toward resubmittal of the project at some future date. Councilmember Ruder moved to reconsider the previous motion; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. The Council will re- consider the Landmark question. Councilme Donovan then moved to tab the parking and setback variance requests until Tie meeting of�� Council in Feb- uary, which wi Councilmember Ruder seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried. The Landmark requests for variances will be heard again on February 7, 1978. Mayor Slifer then introduced the next item on the agenda, consideration of a request from The Printery for amendment of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a real estate office and sign shop on their premises. Mayor Slifer stepped down from the Council table due to possible conflict of interest in the question. Mayor Pro Tem Donovan then introduced Diana Toughill who explained the request. Lou Parker, owner of the Printery covered the background regarding the leasing of space on his premises, stating that two years ago the conditional use permit was originally granted to the Printery to allow Dale McCall to operate an office in the building. Mr. Parker was under the impression that a conditional use permit was nee0ed, or had to be regranted each time the tenant changed in that space. He further stated that there were two new tenants in the building; a sign shop and a real estate office. Mayor ProTem Donovan stated that he sees a difference between types of businesses in that space. There was general discussion between the Council, Ms. Toughill and Mr. Parker regarding the original letter granting the first conditional use permit and regarding parking and traffic questions as they relate to real estate offices and a sign shop as opposed to the type of traffic and parking required for an advertising office. Mayor ProTem Donovan then asked Mr. Parker if he wanted to table the question for further study. Mr. Parker agreed. Councilmember Heimbach then moved to table both questions regarding the sign shop and the real estate office to February 7, 1978 meeting of the Council. Councilmember Wilto seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion carried. Mayor Slifer then resumed his position at the Council table and introduced a letter to Town Manager Minger and the Mayor from Mr. Ordway and Mr. Marshal of Vail Associates regarding the request from the Town of Vail for Vail Associates to consider not building the North building of the Gondola I project. The letter stated that Vail Associates had taken the matter under advisement. Mr. Ordway then personally requested a letter of support from the Town of Vail to be sent to the Forest Service stating that the Town would be in favor of Vail Associates use of the forest service road for access to the Gondola I project area. There was general discussion regarding maintainence, access and assignment of right -of -way and the right -of -way surrounding the building. Council member Heimbach suggested that the Council direct Town Manager Minger to contact the Forest Service regarding use of the road for Vail Associates with the agreement that Vail Associates would give up access through the village voluntarily. Councilmember Palmateer than moved that the Town would send a letter to Vail Associates and the Forest T MINTUES • PAGE OEE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 17 January, 1978 Service regarding a permit for VA to use access road and that VA would give up access to the East and South in the Village. Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion.. Mr. Ordeay requested that the language of the letter to VA not be binding but that the intent be considered the same. The motion was amended to allow that flexibility. All present voted in favor and the motion passed. Next followed a discussion regarding the Bighorn and Sandstone bus fares. Mayor Slifer stated that a request had been received from the Camera Shop in Vail for the Council to consider making the buses to Bighorn and Sandstone free. There was a general dis -. cussion regarding fares and how much was offset by collection. Stan Bernstein, Finance Director, stated that only 1/3 to 1/4 of costs were offset by fares collected. The general consensus of the Council was to remove charges if, in doing so, it would encourage use of buses. There was a discussion regarding publicity of the free bus. The entire council agreed to start immediately with free bus service to those areas effective through the end of the season. Town Manager Terrell Minger then played, for the benefit of Council and the Public at the meeting, an audio tape of the news story which was presented recently on Channel 9 TV in Denver regarding the free shuttle bus system in Vail. The next item on the agenda was a discussion regarding the Horse Drawn Sleigh. Chief of Police Gary Wall reported to Council on the performance of the operator for the two previous weeks. Mr. Cadwell, the operator, stated that he,very much wanted to continue operations in Vail and would make every effort to abide by the restrictions for his operation. There was general discussion regarding the operation. The Council agreed that Mr. Minger and Mr. Wall would have the right to revolk license for the operation if infractions occurred. Ms. Toughill requested that a permit be sought for approval of horses within the Town limits. The agreement of the Council was that the operation could continue until further notice unless it is ended due to an infraction of the rules and regulations. ' Mayor Slifer then noted for information that the Ski Museum and CMC were sponsoring an orientation day on January 27th in the Council Chambers of the Town of Vail municipal building for those who might be interested. In addition, he noted that Mr. Larry Burdick had resigned from the Vail Fire Protection District and the Vail Water and Sanitation District Board of Directors. The Mayor publicly thanked Mr. Burdick for his many years of service to the Town and the special districts. There was a brief discussion regarding openings on the Planning Commission, the Design Review Board and the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. The public was advised that the pedestrian overpass was now open for use. There being no further business for the Council's attention, Councilmember Donovan moved to adjourn. Councilmember Wilto Seconded the motion, all present voted in favor and the motion carried . The meeting adjourned at 10:15 pm. MAYOR ATTEST: TOWN CLERK T"" MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7 FEBRUARY 1978 The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was convened in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building at 7:35 P.M., on Tuesday, February 7, 1978. ' Mayor Rod Slifer and the following Councilmembers were present: Paula Palmateer Tom Steinberg John Donovan Robert Ruder William Wilto Bill Heimbach Others present included: Stan Bernstein, Deputy Town Manager Larry Rider, Town Attorney Ordinance Number 1, Series of 1978, adopting the 1977 Supplement to the Vail Municipal Code was introduced on second reading. Mayor Slifer asked if all Councilmembers had read the ordinance; all had, and there was no discussion. Councilmember Palmateer moved to approve the ordinance on second reading; Councilmember Donovan seconded the motion; all present voted in favor; and the motion carried. Ordinance #1, Series of 1978 will be published by title only. Ordinance #2, Series of 1978, rezoning Lot 4, Block 1, Bighorn Third Addition, Lot27, Block 2, Vail Village Thirteenth Filing, and Lot 3, Block 9, and the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 3, Bighorn Third Addition, was introduced on second reading. Mayor Slifer asked for discussion from the Council and public. Diana Toughill explained the need for this rezoning to be done by ordinance rather than motion in order to legally change the zoning maps. There was no further disucssion and Councilmember Steinberg moved to approve the ordinance on second reading; Councilmember Heimbach seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion carried. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1978 will be published by title only. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1978, imposing a Land Transfer Tax, was introduced on first reading. Mayor Slifer read the title of the ordinance into the official record: "An Ordinance imposing a Land Transfer Tax upon the Transfer of interests in real property; Earmarking the proceeds therefrom for the purchase of real property to be used for open space, recreational or park purposes, or employee housing; Requiring the collection of such tax by the Town Manager or his agents; Exempting certain transactions from the tax imposed; establishing procedures for acquiring a certificate of exemption; Establishing a Land Acquisition Advisory Committee; Establishing penalties for violations of this ordinance; Creation of a lein of) the property transferred for the amount of the tax unpaid; Submitting this ordinance to the qualified electors of the Town; and setting forth details in relation to the foregoing ". He then - for discussion from the Council and public. Councilmember Donovan requested that this item on the agenda be moved to later in the meeting to allow time for additional audience members to arrive. The Council was in agreement. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1978, rezoning Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village Twelfth Filing was then introduced on first reading. Diana Toughill explained that this rezoning constituted a down - zoning of the parcel and that the Vail Planning Commission had recommended approval. Mayor Slifer asked for discussion from the Council and public. There was none and Councilmember Wilto moved to approve Ordinance No. 4, on first reading; Councilmember Donovan seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried. Ordinance No. 4,'Series of 1978 will be published in full. die next item on the agenda for Council consideration was the Landmark request for setback and parking variances. Mayor Slifer asked Diana Toughill to briefly cover the history of the requests in terms of previous meetings. She then introduced Jay K. Peterson, Attorney, acting on behalf of the developers of Landmark, who explained the changes made in the proposal since the last appearance before Council. He explained that the first floor addition to the existing building would be built, but the second floor addition would not be built at this time, but would be a deck instead so that the second floor could be added at a future date. He displayed an elevation map and explained the window arrangement of the building and what sight lines would exist. He went on to discuss the feeling of the developers in terms of the land- scaping of the area being that of greater importance than the parking of cars, although he . TOWN FEBRUARY 7, 1978 PAGE `f WO • 0 acknowledged that parking problems do exist, he added that the developers of Landmark were doing more than just providing for their own parking at this time. Councilmember Wilto asked if the developers would be willing to put money into escrow for future parking needs and Mr. Peterson replied that they would. Edward Volpe, attorney for Kostas Taverna stated that his client would no longer oppose the project. Mr. Mattio, another tenant of the' Landmark buildingstood.to state that he was opposed to the project and asked for proof that the other tenants of the building were in agreement with the proposed addition. He asked that the Council table the matter until all tenants agreed with the proposed project. There was a general discussion among the Councilmembers, developers and tenants regarding the proposals in the project relating to sight lines, ground level displays, windows and the existing stairs. Mayor Slifer then stated for clarification the choices of the Council regarding granting or refusing the variance requests. He stated that the setback variance request and the parking variance request for 26 spaces should be considered separately. Town Attorney Larry Rider then clarified the criteria for the decisions as: Consideration must be on the basis that the variances do not create a detrimental effect on the health and welfare of the neighborhood; that they must consider the long range effects of any variances granted; and that they must consider whether any long term material damages will result. Mayor Slifer reminded the the Counil that the setback question was the only criteria. Councilmember Ruder moved ve the request for setback variances and asked the applican o su mi a s program. He then c aid his mo ion o s a e e setback variance would be for the first floor and with the agreement of the the tenants, the second floor could be built without coming back to council for approval. Councilmember Wilto seconded the motion. Mayor Slifer called for a vole; Voting yes were: Councilmembers Wilto, Ruder and Palmateer. Voting No were Councilmembers Heimbach, Steinberg, Donovan and Mayor Slifer. The motion failed. Mayor Slifer then returned to Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1978, since the audience had since filled up with those who were interested in this matter. Having earlier read the title into the record, Mayor Slifer began to explain the background regarding the growth management and real estate transfer tax committees and the work they had done to lay the ground work for this ordinance. Bob Fritch,.from the Sitzmark Lodge, stated that he objected to the funds from the tax being spent for employee housing, and that he believed that this addition to the ordinance was in conflict with the uses for open space. Harold Shaw from the Lodge at Vail stated that.he disliked the idea of a transfer tax and that he was personally against the tax. Councilmember Donovan defended the concept and reminded Mr. Shaw that an election would be held and that the public could decide. Mr. Shaw then stated that he was in agreement with the concept, but that he felt the Council might look for other ways fund purchase of open space and other methods of controlling growth. Councilmember Steinberg then moved to approve Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1978 on first reading; Councilmember Donovan seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion passed. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1978 will be published in full. The next item on the agenda for Council consideration was a request for setback variance for Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village Sixth Filing, from Federline. Mayor Slifer introduced Diana Toughill who introduced James Morter, architect for the applicant who explained the need for variances due to the site restrictions. He explained that the house would be stepped up back into the hill and that created the necessity for height variances. He then explained that the landscaping would be completed so as to preserve the site, and that there would be no impact on the neighbors in terms of drainage or views. Mayor Slifer asked if Dr. Eulein had been contacted. Mr. Morter replied that he had been unable to contact him. Mayor Slifer then asked for questions from the Council or public. There were none. He then stated for the record that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the variance request. Councilmember Heimbach moved to approve the variance; Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion;. All present, except Mayor Slifer, voted in favor and the motion carried. Mayor Slifer pointed out that he voted against the variance because he feels the Council should not have passed the variance without having advised the neighbors of the request. The next matter for Council consideration was a request for funding from Colorado Mountain College. Randy Milhoan from CMC outlined the request for $10,000 and explained that the funds were needed to help support the CMC SummerVail Workshop in the areas of working scholarships and housing and advertising. Councilmember Heimbach asked Mr. Milhoan to supply to the Council a complete Budget for the CMC program in Vail. Mr. Milhoan agreed to do so. Councilmember Steinberg clarified that he would like to see a budget for the entire Vail operation, not just the Swimiervail Workshop. There was a general discussion regarding what percentage of Vail taxes went to CMC and the service level of the SummerVail Workshop. Mr. George Knox, avail 0 MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 7 Vary, 1978 page three resident stated that he supports the request for funds and Mr. Jim Cotter, a vail resident, asked for a quick decision from the Council to enable the program to be advertised as soon as possible. Councilmember Donovan moved to approve a contribution of $10,000 from the Town of Vail to Colorado Mountain College, pending the approval of ah operating budget. Council- member Wilto seconded the motion. all present voted in favor and the motion passed. The next item on the agenda was a discussion regarding the Gondola I proposal from Vail Associates and the appeal of an administrative decision. Mayor Slifer explained the back- ground regarding the request of the Town of Vail that Vail Associates place a dollar value on the building space. Phil Ordway, representing Vail Associates explained the background and site plan for the proposed project. Citizens Dudley Abbott and Josef Staufer stated that they were led to believe that there would always be a Gondola I and that they were in favor of the Town of Vail buying the space for preservation. They further stated that they thought Vail Associates should honor its committments made to people who came to Vail and invested. Mr. Robert Oliver presented a petition to the Council stating support for the preservation of the open space. There was general discussion among the citizens in attendance stating support for the proposed project and support for the Town of Vail purchase of the land. Consensus of public opinion was support of the purchase of the space by the Town of Vail for preser- vation of the open space in the plaza. Mayor Slifer then asked for comments from the Council. Counclmember Steinberg stated that it was not the lack of Gondola I that would kill the golden goose, that the Town should but land to prevent development of additional condominiums. Councilmember Palmateer stated that she thought the price was to high for the parcel. Councilmember Heimbach stated that he thinks tho.town has made wise buys in the past in terms of dollar value per acre, but that this 1/4 acre is not worth the asking price. Councilmember Donovan stated that the Council was not just looking at 1/4 acre, but the preservation of that space would benefit everyone in the core and encourage people to come to the core area. Councilmember Ruder stated that he had concerns about whether or not the Town of Vail budget could handle this expense down the road. Councilmember Wilto stated that i.t would be advantageous to the Town to purchase the open space but that he felt that the price was too high. Mayor Slifer stated that he agreed with Councilmember Donovan in that the space should be preserved and supported the purchase by the Town of Vail. Deputy Town Manager Stan Bernstein stated that the Town was not necessarily bound to the financing plan outlined by Vail Associates, that there were other possible alternatives and that the Town budget could stand to bear another $60,000 per year expenditures. Mayor Slifer then called for a motion from the Council. Councilmember Donovan.moved to . proceed.with the purchase. Councilmember Ruder seconded the motion. Councilmembers voting in -favor were: Donovan. and Slifer. Councilmembers voting against were:. Palmateer, Steinberg, Heimback, Ruder and Wilto. The motion failed. Lou Parker, a vail resident then asked Mayor Slifer if the price could be negotiated. The Mayor stated that the Council would be happy to continue negotiations. Mr. Parker then requested that that more negotiations take place. The next matter for Council attention was the appeal of an administrative decision of the Town of Vail Zoning Administrator by Mr. Charles McDermott, an attorney. Larry Rider introduced Mr. McDermott who explained that his appeal was directed to the approvals granted by the Zoning administrator of the Gondola I project for building. He then proceeded to presen. evidence and question Ms. Toughill, the Zoning Administrator regarding the requirements of an environmental impact statement for developments. At this point he was interrupted by Mayor Slifer who asked Town Attorney Larry Rider if this process of question and answer was appropriate at this time. Mr. Rider stated that in the appeal Mr. McDermott does have the right to present evidences as he sees fit. Councilmember Heimbach requested that Council consider tableing the hearing of the appeal for two weeks so that Vail Associates and the Town of Vail Could study the appeal. Mr. McDermott stated that a copy of the appeal had been sent to Vail Associates the Town of Vail and Ms. Toughill dated January 20, 1978. There was a brief discussion regarding whether or not the presentation should take place tonight or whether it should be tabled. Councilmember Heimbach moved to table the matter of the appeal for two weeks. Councilmember Steinberg seconded the motion; all present voted in favor and the motion carried. The next matter for Council attention was the appointment of members to the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission. Councilmember Heimbach moved to reappoint Bill Ruoff and Abe Schapiro to the Design Review Board, and to reappoint Dudley Abbott and Gerry White to the Planning Commission to allow more time for additional applicants to come forth. MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL 7 February, 1978 • PAGE FOUR COUNCILMEMBER Steinberg seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion carried. The next matter for Council attention was the appointment of a member to the Local Licensing Authority. One application had been received from Bette Renz. Councilmember Donovan moved to appoint Ms. Renz. Councilmember Wilto seconded the motion. All present voted in favor and the motion carried. The next item on the agenda was a discussion of an amendment to the dog control regulations. Mayor Slifer introduced Pat Dodson, Town of Vail Recreation Director , who outlined the memo sent to Council regarding the problems being experienced by the recreation on public lands and facilities with dogs not under control. Mayor Slifer stated that the Council had directed Town Attorney Larry Rider to do an amendment to the existing dog control ordinance to require leashing of dogs on public recreational facilities. There was a general discussion of the overall dog problem. Gordon Swanson, Fire Chief, stated for Council information that the Fire Department has assumed responsibility for dog control and that shortly there would be improved coverage i.n the area of enforcement of the dog ordinance. Mayor Slifer suggested that the Council should consider having a public meeting on the dog problem at its first meeting in March. The next item for attention of the Council was the reports of the Town Manager and Town Attorney. Larry Rider reported that the Vail Run lawsuit had been settled which cleared up the Lionsridge annexation and zoning. There being no further business for the Council, Councilmember Palmateer seconded the motion, all Councilmember Donovan moved to adjourn. present voted in favor and the motion carried. MAY ATTEST: TOWN CLERK • MEMORANDUM I I 1� �;� )1-1� C'/ TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1977 RE: LANDMARK BUILDING REQUEST FOR PARKING VARIANCE AND SETBACK VARIANCE. Application has been made by Jay Peterson, representing Landmark Commercial Development Company, for a 26 car parking variance and a setback va-iance in order to permit a 7093 square foot addition to the existing Landmark commercial space. Following is a summary of proposed additions and parking requirements: Square Feet Kostas Taverena Le Cadeau Colorado Insight Cabbage & Kings New Shop General Store 754.0 1,308.0 2,262.5 541.5 380.0 1,847.5 7,093.5 Parking Required 5.03 4.36 7.54 1.80 1.27 6.16 26.16 or 26 The applicant can provide the required parking on site and the 500 covered parking requirement can be met by existing underground parking in excess of that required by ordinance (850 of parking is covered). Parking utilization statistics indicate that an average of only 520 of the existing parking is being used; this leaves approximately 43 spaces which have not been needed to serve the existing building. Based on these statistics, we recommend that the applicant not be required to provide the 26 spaces, but that the Town reserve the right to require the construction of the 26 spaces in the future if it is determined by the Planning Commission they are necessary based on parking surveys conducted by the Town. We feel it would be better to retain existing landscaping rather than require unneccessary asphalt. The applicant has also requested a setback variance on the south, west, and east sides of the proposed building. Required setbacks are 28' which is due to the height of the existing building (approximately 70'). Existing setbacks are West -30 East -23 and South -49 proposed setbacks are West -21', East -10 and South -15'. PAGE 2 Landmark Parking Variance All other zoning requirements have been met. The addition makes the building more conforming in that it provides offsets in a 120' long, unbroken wall. CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS (SECTION 18.62.060) 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. After a thorough review of the Lionshead area, it is our conclusion that a comparable addition is not possible on any other building. The Department of Community Development is preparing legislation which will recommend that pedestrian scale additions be allowed in CC2 to enable retail shops to expand toward the pedestrian mall. The proposed addition is surrounded on three sides by pedestrian mall. We then feel we can justify removal of parking for aesthetic reasons to obtain more landscaping. There have been no parking variances granted in the Lionshead area except those removed to allow more landscaping. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege. Strict interpretation of the ordinance would not allow the proposed building addition on the site. A number of parking variances have been granted in Lionshead (Vail International, Sunbird, Montaneros, Lodge at Lionshead, Studio in the Rockies) to allow for more landscaping. In every case, the parking could be provided but landscaping was more desirable in meeting the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Every building in Lionshead developed prior to 1974 is within 15' of their property line. The Sunbird Lodge, located directly south of the proposed addition received a variance for zero setbacks on the north, east and west property lines and Montaneros on the west was also granted a zero setback on the north side. There appears to be no adverse impact created by the proposed addition as it is approximately 50' from its nearest neighbor. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. A positive impact could be created pertaining to distribution of population. The Lionshead area is in critical need of commercial activity to draw people through the mall system and create interest in the area. We foresee no adverse impacts on other factors. AGE 3 Landmark Parking Variant FINDINGS- The Planning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. SEE ITEMS 1 AND 2 UNDER CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS. Grant of the parking and setback variance request is consistent with treatment of other sites in the area. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. We feel the project would have a very positive impact on the neighborhood and would not be detrimental to any other properties in the vicinity. It begins to create pedestrian scale retail space which we feel is badly needed to make Lionshead work better. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this ordiance. The setback regulations are designed to guarantee adequate separation between buildings and adequate open space - both of these intents have been met. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. SEE ITEMS 1 AND 2 UNDER CONSIDERATION OF FACTORS. The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the requested variances with the condition that the 26 parking spaces be provided if parking survey statistics indicate they are necessary at any time in the future. I�r f � ` fa P ka � 3C 4 irrm ELAN I Q Mtt;"ANIl:AL ELECTRICAL Q JOB NAME OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 3" 19 �lj TOTAL 6, od TOTAL FLOOR AREA NAME 'lidomL! rlr l -- 1,410x CLASS OF WO m TOTAL LOT AREA MAIL ADDRESS �_ 3f�3 NEW () ALTERATION W6ADDITION 1 1 REPAIR 1 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO Lu Z O CITY Vq /' PH. �36 V USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED It "" '"'' � O NAME SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. O ST. PARKING — 2 Q MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O cc — -- V ~ CITY PH NO. OF LIVING UNITS �' FRONT EASEMENTS w NAME / �. K� (, CONDO. LODGE SIDE .(R) r = MAIL ADDRESS SO. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE Q / Yo r / L � 64 0 4 CITY PH. TYPE OF HEAT WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR 1 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT 1 1 J Q V LOT BLK FILING COVERING L7 N 5A Kra 0 TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF. a APPLICATION INT. WALLS FEES CE E 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 0 IV V I HR BUILDING PERMIT SPECIFIED YES NO 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G Hp1 J PLAN CHECK FEES AN EC DIVISION 1 2 3 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL A L 3. USE ZONE ' DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER PERMIT GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION T AL i "� GL/G lrY/V Q df--� OCCUPANCY SEPARATION ey e f- C I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE 4 0 -� h / v« S �G SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE p/• ,Q Q C ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY O SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE - L EGARDING UILDING NSTRUCTION. SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER • Ih•vAn" veil .�_. _ SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR t MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: LANDMARK SETBACK VARIANCE DATE: JULY 29, 1976 Landmark Condominium Association has requested a setbac': vari- ance to allow construction of roof structure to cove existing deck area. New roof is approximately 8' from the north property line along its length, with one entrance area at the property line. The required setback under current zoning regulations is approximately 31' due to the height of the building. Consideration of factors (Section 19,600): 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The location of the requested variance is adjacent to the Vail Associates parking strutted. The proposal in the vicinity. Other ice problems in a simil of tall buildings where long. lot on which no buildings will be con- will have no impact on any other building structrues should be encouraged to solve ar manner particularly on the north sides ice is a continual problem all winter 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regula- tion is necessary to acheive compatibility and uni- formity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege. The intent of the setback requirement is to prevent build- ings from being constructed too close together and thus crowding their sites. As there will be no structures to the north, we feel the intent of the setback requirement has been met by the applicant. The declaration of purposes for the zoning ordinance state: "To secure safety from ... accumulation bf snow, and I Landmark Page 2 0 other dangerous conditions." We feel the roof addition is in line with the declaration of purposes stated in the ordinance and that granting the variance would not be a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The requested variance would have no impact on population, transportation, traffic or utilities. The day skier parking lot would'not be adversely affected by the proposal as there is a large, landscaped berm and a significant elevation change between the parking lot and the proposed covered deck. There would be a positive impact on public safety as the ice buildup at the entrance of the townhouse units is dangerous and the roof structure would help prevent the ice accumulation. Findings: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, See item 2 under Consideration of Factors, page one. We feel that approval of the requested variance would not be a grant of special privilege. Most of the buildings in the Lionshead area were constructed uncbr the former zoning ordinance which required a 10' setback and most exterior modifications would require a similar variance. The roof structure as proposed improves the north facade of the Landmark building and makes it more desirable for the guest. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties'or improvements in the vicinity. Landmark . • Page 3 We think that the proposed variance will be beneficial to the public safety in that it could prevent "slip and fall" type accidents. The proposed variance would not be detrimental to any other properties in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: (a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforce- ment of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this ordinance. ,: .. There could be physical hardship created by any other type of solution to the ice problem as the concrete deck where the problem exists has been in place since the construction of the building which makes heating of the deck area impractical as it serves.as the roof of the parking structure beneath the deck area. Approval of the variance is consistent with the objectives of the ordinance as stated in the declaration of purpose for the zoning ordinance. (b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. See statement of physical characteristics of the deck area in (a) above. The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the requested variance. • DESIGN REVIEW BOA • DATE OF btI:ETIN _6 G: '` MEMBERS PRESENT: a / r► ,�,L -- SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: i MOTION: VOTE: FOR: ABSTENTION: APPROVED: _ 5 / - DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY �f L IY2- . f SECONDED BY: AGAINST: TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT JOB NAME( DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REG. BUILDING Z PLUMBING O Q MECHA 7 Q ELECTRICAL W z OTHER TOTAL TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REG. TOTAL FLOOR AREA NAME CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA W z MAIL ADDRESS NEW () ALTERATION toeADDITION ( 1 REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY ` PH. USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED NAME 0 SQ. FT. OF BLDG. ---. HEIGHT IN FT. -- OFF ST. PARKING ' F 0 MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES _�, SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING V ~ CITY PH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS — FRONT EASEMENTS U NAME CONDO. LODGE - SIDE (R) ILI H v MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR ( ► ELEC 1 ) UNIT ( ► C vVi LOT BLK FILING COVERING W W C TRACT EXT.WALLS ROO APPLICATION INT. WALLS VR FEES ACCEPT BUILDING PERMIT QO 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V 1 HR SPECIFIED YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G DI J PLAN CHE FIRE SPRINKLERS k PLUMBING DIVISION 1 2 3 4 WET STANDPIPE y( MECHANICAL P AL DRY STANDPIPE SC ELECTRICAL 3. USE ZONE COMB. STANDPIPE k CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE X OTHER PERMIT # GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL =° /O F -7L 4 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION O HAV E . I HEREB NOWLEDGE TH I SOIL TEST x READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE SPECIAL INSPECTOR LAWS REGARDING BUILDING SONSTRUCTION. PLAN NUMBER tln ppm"Naii SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR i DESIGN REVIEW BOA DATE OF MEETING: i.., MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: _ �! /-, o , ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: /� � lLj- MOTION : VOTE: FOR: m� �Uc - 6# 4 � C 1 4 SECONDED BY: AGAINST: • T f1T TlATT r l� �♦ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Chai.rrian of the Board Applicant a DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: ILL ( o j - . 1 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: C!,G SECONDED BY: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: 1 ABSTENTION APPROVED L/ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: man of the Board : a -kl ;L -. �2 "� i 1 "Applicant ' k? r 7D --7 r r • If MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: LANDMARK SETBACK VARIANCE DATE: JULY 29, 1976 • Landmark Condominium Association has requested a setbac': vari- ance to allow construction of roof structure to cove existing deck area. New roof is approximately 8' from the north property line along its length, with one entrance area at the property line. The required setback under current zoning regulations is approximately 31' due to the height of the building. Consideration of factors (Section 19,600): 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The location of the requested variance is adjacent to the Vail Associates strutted. The proposal in the vicinity, Other ice problems in a simil of tall buildings where long. lot on which no builttings will be con - will have no impact on any other building structrues should be encouraged to solve ar manner particularly on the north sides ice is a continual problem all winter 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regula- tion is necessary to acheive compatibility and uni- formity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this ordinance without grant of special privilege. The intent of the setback requirement is to prevent build- ings from being constructed too close together and thus crowding their sites. As there will be no structures to the north, we feel the intent of the setback requirement has been met by the applicant. The declaration of purposes for the zoning ordinance state: "To secure safety from ... accumulation of snow, and Landmark . Page 2 • other dangerous conditions." We feel the roof addition is in line with the declaration of purposes stated in the ordinance and that granting the variance would not be a grant of special privilege.. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The requested variance would have no impact on population, transportation, traffic or utilities. The day skier parking lot would not be adversely affected by the proposal as there is a large, landscaped berm and a significant elevation change between the parking lot and the proposed covered deck. There would be a positive impact on public safety as the ice buildup at the entrance of the townhouse units is dangerous.,a.nd the roof structure would help prevent the ice accumulation. Findings: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. See item 2 under Consideration of Factors, page one. We feel that approval of the requested variance would not be a grant of special privilege. Most of the buildings in the Lionshead area were constructed uncbr the former zoning ordinance which required a 10' setback and most exterior modifications would require a similar variance. The roof structure as proposed improves the north facade of the Landmark building and makes it more desirable for the guest. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. i Landmark • Page 3 • We think that the proposed variance will be beneficial to the public safety in that it could prevent "slip and fall" type accidents. The proposed variance would not be detrimental to any other properties in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: (a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforce- ment of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this ordinance. There could be physical hardship created by any other type of solution to the ice problem as the concrete deck where the problem exists has been in place since the construction of the building which makes heating of the deck area impractical as it serves as the roof of the parking structure beneath the deck area. Approval of the variance is consistent with the objectives of the ordinance as stated in the declaration of purpose for the zoning ordinance. (b) There are exceptional or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. See statement of physical characteristics of the deck area in (a) above. The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the requested variance. PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) do solemnly swear that I am the _P'JBLA54 - V?— of THE VAIL TRAIL; that the same is a weekly newspaper • printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed ,legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as second -class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of consecutive insertions; and that the first pubication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated NJ V Ly 2 A .D. 19 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated �V LH 'Z- 19 -1 4P A.D. 19 • u In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this , day of �l hl V L� A.D. 19 � Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public State of Colorado, this tt day of My Commission expires the Cg6nty of Eagle, _ A.D. 192L n �+ Notary Public 19 -7_ Public Notice PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Mr. W. Robert Smith, representing Landmark Condominium Association, is request,ng a ,ariagrArom Article 9, Section 9.602 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973 in order to construct a covering over the northern walkway of the Landmark Townhouses. Application had been made in accord with Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance. A Public Hearing will be held on July 22, 1976 before the Vail Planning Commission, whose decision will be transmitted to the Town Council for final action. The Public Hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal Building at 3:00 p.m. TOWNOF VAIL DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jo Kramer Sign Administrator Published in the Vail Trail, July 2, 1976. Public Notice PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Mr. W. Robert Smith, representing Landmark Condominium Association, is requesting a variance from Article 9, Section 9.602 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973 in order to construct a covering over the northern walkway of the Landmark Townhouses. Application had been made in accord with Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance. A Puhl ; July 22, 1976 before the Vail Planning Commission, whose decision will be transmitted to the Town Council for final action. ThP Public Hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal Building at 3:00 P.M. TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Kamer blished in the Vail Trail, July 2, 1976 N 7 � r wo r if iratr Wrrupanrg rt ' .' t5 /�o, �.SF:'�:;Y � %yf � Y ,�y ,,.``K �\ ` _- '� ��. �. xS' .ir._ '.�. ? �s� 5 �f a .�'..�1i..�. �ry ,�' � {�,`. 9. ��. "_ �� ,� -,��' i ' . �' �1t 4 Y "�� iLf�l)� b�_, ,� own (v t� ALA Builbing lippartment PY. THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 306 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CER TIFYING THAT A T THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STR UCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE, WITH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD— ` a ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE. FOR THE FOLLOWING: Name LANDMARK TOWNHOUSES (28 Units) Use Classification Multi-Family Dwelling Group H Budding Permit No. 1677 —Type Construction IV Fire Zone 1 Use ZoneCC Owner of Budding LANDMARK CONDOMINIUMS LTD. 612 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado BuilAng Address 1311 Official Brate lown(o V814 POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE A ® o Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N2 225 Building Valuation $ ---------------------------- Electrical Valuation $ ....... Permit Fee $ ... Inspection Fee $........ Total Fee Date Paid ........................ .. • .. . Received ------------------------------------------------- Job Name ....... � ..... ------------------------------------- Date of Application .... ...... ...........................19 -- . . .......... Electrical Contractor .......... ....... . ............. Applicant Signature ------------- Building Official APPROVALS ......................... ... i .... .... .................................. Date Date THIS FOR IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 2A HOURS ADVANCE NOME REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE D. 1. "018KE1 10, DENVER 11145 Trrfif t - raft of Orruvanry clown Of Vait Nlitthiltg DPpFlxtrilPlt# 0 THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 306 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING THAT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 61 7 ARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD— ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE. FOR THE FOLLOWING: Name LANDMARK COMMERCIAL BUILDING Use Classification Commercial Space Group F -2 Building Permit No. 1677 Type Construction I I Fire Zone 2 Use Zone Owner of Building Landmark Commercial Development, c/o Jeff Selby ( Box 1528, Vail) Buildin ress Lionshea4, 610 West Lionshead Circle, Vail, Colorado uilding c icial = , 7, ' t gy14" pg i Date t o wn U 101 h POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE 0 THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIRERIENTS OF SECTION 306 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING THAT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD— ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE. FOR THE FOLLOWING: Name Use Classification "-11.T )5A221 / . � ) Group Building Permit No. Type Construction Fire Zon Use ZoneA Owner of Building /V� /r✓ /u //l�S C�rO. Building Address Building Official I N IN I .,� Date Io POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE i i December 30, 1975 Dean L. Southworth Empire Savings 1654 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Dear Dean: Vail Associates, Inc. agrees to complete the landscaping on the west end of the Landmark Condominiums as shown in the Vail Associates, Inc. Landscape Plan dated July 6, 1975. Such landscaping will include sodding, irrigation and trees. In addition, Vail Associates, Inc. shall complete the gravel area on the south side of the project between the tower and the townhouses. All these improvements should be completed by June 1, 1976. Sincerely, VAIL ASS CI drew D. Norris Vice - President/ Real Estate ADN /smw AREA CODE 303 476 -5601 • BOX 7. VAIL. COLORADO 81657 F December 30, 1975 Dean L. Southworth Empire Savings 1654 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Dear Dean: Vail Associat s, Inc. agrees to complet the Landscaping on the west end f the Landmark Condominiu,s as shown in the Vail Associat Inc Landscape Plan tec7 July 6, 1975. Such landscaping ng, irrigation and trees. In addition, Vail Associates, Inc. shall complete the gravel area on the south side of the project between the tower and the townhouses. All these improve-mcnts should be completed by June 1, 1976. Sincerely, VAIL ASSOCIATES, I11C. AhOrew D. Norris Vice- President/ Real Estate ADN /smw TOWN OF V A I L BUILDING _ -- PLUMBING TYPE OF OCCUPANCY AMOUNT EXITS REQ. BUILDIP&M PERMI Q MECHANICAL Q LECTRICAL JOB NAME �._.�._.__ -- OTHER 4 0 ml DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL TOTAL FLOOR AREA NAME CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA W Z MAIL ADDRESS ,! NEW 1 1 ALTERATION 1 1 ADDITION ( 1 REPAIR ( ► FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY PH. USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED NAME SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. O ST. PARKING Z Q MAIL ADDRESS I� NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOAD ING O a[ _ - V ~ CITY L, >t, j PH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS w NAME CONDO. LODGE SIDE (R) ILI F = MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE ¢ TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 J 4 vVi LOT BLK FILING COVERING W W O TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF APP N/ INT. WALLS FEES 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 111 IV V 1 HR BUILDING PERMIT 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J SPECIFIED YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK 40 DIVISION 1 23 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL AP 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE v ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT / SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER PER # �K GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF W / yy ORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL ��p1� G /,� OCCUPANCY SEPARATION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THHA y 144 L�� SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY 7 C� 6121a SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE NSPECTOR LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. I PL N NUMBER Me prinNry /veil C SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR • PLUMBING/ MECHANICAL TOWN OF VAI L • PERMIT E OF BUILDING: OF WORK: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: EW ❑ ADDITION ❑ REMODEL ❑ REPAIR PLUMBING: NUMBER " P MECHANICAL: NUMBER IQ4 -7 - ' M VALUATION $ VALUATION $ p 0 REMARKS: REMARKS: [PERMIT FE PERMIT F E 3 11 �LLJ APPROVED ❑ - DATE 15 %%j _7+ TOTAL FEE $ D � I-1 / jptb 7� office of the town manager November 3, 1975 Mr. Eric Bendfeldt Empire Savings 1654 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: Recreational Amenities Tax and Credit Landmark Project Dear Mr. Bendf e ldt : As you requested by telephone, below is a summary of the recreational amenities tax and credit. TO T A L TA X $49,371.00 CREDIT Cost of Amenities (1) Swimming Pool $20,000 (2) Recreation Decks 9,000 $29,000 Credit allowed 5070 X $29,000 $14,500.00 NET TAX FOR LANDMARK $34,871.00 REFUND TO LEVIN Credit on Landmark $14,500.00 Less net tax due on Vantage - 7,647.83 Point II $ 6,852.17 Plus over payment of tax on Landmark $ 1,441.75 TOTAL REFUNDED $ 8,293.92 NWHI of nail box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 office of the town manager November 3, 1975 Mr. Eric Bendfeldt Empire Savings 1654 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: Recreational Amenities Tax and Credit Landmark Project Dear Mr. Bendf e ldt : As you requested by telephone, below is a summary of the recreational amenities tax and credit. TO T A L TA X $49,371.00 CREDIT Cost of Amenities (1) Swimming Pool $20,000 (2) Recreation Decks 9,000 $29,000 Credit allowed 5070 X $29,000 $14,500.00 NET TAX FOR LANDMARK $34,871.00 REFUND TO LEVIN Credit on Landmark $14,500.00 Less net tax due on Vantage - 7,647.83 Point II $ 6,852.17 Plus over payment of tax on Landmark $ 1,441.75 TOTAL REFUNDED $ 8,293.92 Mr. Eric Bendfeldt November 3, 197 Page Two 4 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. • Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Diana S. Toughill Zoning Administrator nL[ OCT 2 3 1974 Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N2 66 Building Valuation $ ---------------------------- Electrical Valuation .................... Permit Fee $ ....... $ ........... 8 Inspection Fee .......... Total Fee $ . .......... ..... . 1// Date Paid .................. j 4 1 . .Vy 7 - Y - - - - - -- Received By ........... 4 .1 - I" ------------ 160A %-- / � Job Nam aZ.-ft�!.z t A Date of Application ....... zo--4= .. . ............................ ........... Electrical Contractor ...... --- 4- ......... ----------------------------- Applicant.. APPROVALS ... ;; ............................... Date ............................................................ ............. . ....... in it .6iiicia.i Date THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS I THE C. F. NOICKIL CO.. OINVIR 207331 : sra« saa�r�s4sa +:.a`,wa�sasrYcw > s = vs -- e s Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N2 9 Building Valuation $---------------------------- �� Electrical Valuation $____ .... oa Permit Fee $ ..... • ...... Inspection Fee $ - - - -- - ----- --- - - - - -- Total Fee $.- c:._.- ...... Date Paid . � - - - - -- Received By .... .............. . - a---- .. - - -- Job Name - - - - - -: Date of Application ....... '�!� ..................... 19. Electrical Contractor .. ............ . ........ . = - - . .... .............. Applicant...-- ...... ,r jam.... �- G;c------------------ ----- - - - -- APPROVALS RLE JUN 31974 ...... wir ----------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ,- Date ----- ..... . ......... ................. Pian Checker otficiai Date I THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS I rxc a. r. xaro�ca� ao., oaxvu aaun MCFALL AND KONKEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. JAMES H. KONKEL. PRES. JAMES D. MCFALL. EXEC. VP WILLIAM R. KIMBALL, VP TEMPLE 0. LOONEY. JR., VP R. L. ETHRIDGE.BUS. MGR October 7, 1975 Mr. Dean So worth Empire Savings and Loan 1654 Cal' ornia Street Denver, Colorado 80202 RE: 4.andmark at Vail Our Job No. 1378 Dear Mr. Southworth: I LO �- /- f 2160 50. CLERMONT ST. DENVER, COLORADO 80222 303- 753 -1260 303- 757 -4976 After our inspection to the above project, I talked to the Vail Building Inspector, Ben Strahan, and Chief Carlisle of Vail Fire Department. Chief Carlisle informed me that the threads on the fire hose cabinet valves do not meet the Vail standard. The Contractor should contact Chief Carlisle and then supply the correct threaded connections on the valves. It is my understanding that the valves may remain and adapters can be added to change the outlets from iron pipe to NPT threads. I also discussed our design calling for thermostat operated heating cable on the valves with Chief Carlisle and Ben Strahan. This office feels the heating cable is necessary to keep the valves from freezing and must be installed by the Contractors. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, William R. Kimball cc: Chief Carlis Ben Strahan Dana C. Rickli WRK:m MCFALL AND KONKEL l,IN S ill IINl; ENI,INF F Its INc iAME`, R KONKEL FIRES. IAMFS D MCFALL. EYFC. Y'F` % ;LLIAM R KIMBALL. VP T;. MPLE U LOONEY. JR.. VP R L FTHRIDGE. BUS MGR. September 25, 1975 Mr. Dean Southworth Empire Savings and Loan 1654 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 RE: Landmark at Vail Our Job No. 1378.2 -M Dear Mr. Southworth: .160 SO CI FRMIINI S! UEr.IVFR GULI�RAUO 6 222 303 -75 3 - 1 261) 303 -757 aU -f The enclosed is a list of items not yet complete or not in accordance with the plans and specifications on the subject job. These were noted during our visit to the site on September 24', 1975. In attendance were Dean Southworth with Empire Savings, Frank Sue of Sol Flax and Associates, Bill Kimball of McFall & Konkel and Bob Mier of Mier Construction. The attached punch list calls out the items to be completed by the Contractor. Upon completion of these items the Contractor should notify you, at which time the Mechanical Division of the building should be ready for acceptance by the Owner. Acceptance does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibil- ity for completion of the contract if there are other items in the plans and specifications not yet completed. Very truly yours, William R. Kimball cc: Bel co Dana C. Rickli Mier Construction Howard Electric enclosure WRr::m I e ems- • RE: Landmark at Vail Punch List September 25, 1975 MECHANICAL ITEMS 1. Unit 702 a. Electric baseboard cover is loose in living room. b. Electric baseboard end cap loose in dining room. c. Light bulb missing in toilet exhaust/light unit. d. Loft bathroom lavatory trap is leaking. 2. Unit 601 a. Shower head loose in northeast bathroom. 3. Unit 503 a. Upper level NW bedroom baseboard cover is off unit. 4. Unit 505 a. Hot and cold water faucet handles are reversed on Kitchen sink. 5. Unit 405 a. Shower head loose in northeast bathroom. 5. Unit 303 a. Loft area baseboard is not wired, and cover is off. b. Kitchen range hood is loose from cabinets. 7. Unit 402 a. Water closet seats in both bathrooms are not new seats. 8. Unit 302 a. baseboard cover in the northwest bedroom is off. 9. Unit 203 a. Baseboard cover.in living room is not installed level, cover is off unit. b. The dishwasher waste is not Installed. c. Showerheads are loose in both baths. 10. Unit 202 4. baseboard cover is loose in northeast bedroom and living room. 11. Office Unit Baseboard cover is loose in northeast bedroom. 12. Unit 103 a. Heat lamp bulb is out in exhaust /light unit. b. Dishwasher door will not shut, therefore, unit will not operate. c. Baseboard cover is loose in northwest bedroom. Rl: ttndmark aj. Va'fT Punch tltl Q x 7 Septead i�''1�5; 3. Loft: r 1 3. aft 404 a. Basgti+Qa fie oosd to dfaf�hg p ,; Ike t} i � l4 a. Baseboard cover is loose in dining room. _,A. . CA u: b. 'S6mi `Nad"Jii1-66340z-' °` Cc ce trot avrd `'ddl d - water suppl'fhs' =1t'#e -r * id t*r- lavatory, a 15: Wt'F28 a. Baseboard is loose in upper level bedroom. 16. Unft 'T27 a: _ S+it�Sakje-dlset - ii< Tugged. ,• a b. Sink °l OLD and cdl d grater not o0rabl e. �. t*Vatry behind link, Maier faucet will not shut off. 17. Unit T26 a. Upper level shower head is loose. 18. Unit T25 a. Upper level shower head is loose. 19. Some of the exhaust fan wall caps on the.townshouses are dented and some have not been painted. 20. Office Level Men's Toilet a. The unit heater must be moved out from the wall V to meet UL listing. b. West water closet installed off center (too close to urinal. 21. Office f Level - Water Htr. Room a. Thermometer on the west water heater is broken. •. 22. Swimming ' Pool Equip. Roam a. Gas line to the boiler 1s not Installed, boiler inoperative. b. The tenant below this space (Koustas Tavern&) has extended a duct up thru the equipment room. By code, this room must be enclosed by a one -hour barrier. Either a fire damper is needed or the duct needs to be enclosed in a 1 -hour shaft. This Is not part of the original building contract, but is the tenant's responsibility. *00 RE: Landmark at Vail Punch List` ;, '� • - �° September 25, 1975 23. Loft t Roof Level, The 6" drystand pipe has not been extended to the roof level as shown.on M -9. 846 ; Fire hose. a Cabinets .. Electric resistance heat tape has not been installed on the fire hose valves. We are concerned that the valves will freeze without the heat tape. .25. Garage ,�.. Exhaust. Fans a. Plans call for fans to be three feet off grade, presently, they are less than one foot from grade and will tend to plug with snow. r b. South, fan cowling is damaged* t r , . j �Q. w s 1 SO L FLAX 9 ASSOCIATES INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS • 247 WASHINGTON STREET • DENVER, COLORADO 80207 • 777.2621 September 25, 1975 McFall & Konkel, Consulting Engineers 2160 South Clermont Street Denver, Colorado 80222 Attention: Bill Kimbell Re: Landmark at Lionshead #72120 r "4 4 : Dear Bill: On September 24, 1975, 1 observed the electrical installation on the above referenced project. The following comments were noted: 1. Electrical Distribution Room: a. Label Tenant Main Circuit Breaker at Tenant Distribution Center with plastic laminant stick -on. b. Provide "GFI" for pool light circuit in Panel "HLP". 2. Pool Deck: a. Reinstall globe on post light at pool. 3. Office: a. Install fixtures on light trac. 4. 3 & 5th Floors: a One (1) exit light broken at each location. 5. Outside: a. Heat mats for drive have not been installed. 6. General: a. Trims are missing from recessed lights in several units. If I can be of any further assistance, please call me. Yours xery tr�, Frank Sue FS:pk nn, { .J ► 9 LL M�F clown Of Batt THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 306 OF THE 4 ` UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING THAT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD — r ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE FOR THE FOLLOWING: �cvtu Z Name ° LANDMARK Units Use Classification MULTI - FAMILY CONDOMINIUMS Group H /�9sowl�/ eQ1 E Building Permit No. Type Construction I I Fire Zone 2 Use Zone CC-2 Owner of Building LANDMARK CONDO'S LTD. !o t eL Build' ress URnsheod Circle, Vail { uilding Df ici %val September 26, 1975 Date tow POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE C�r��tftrtt�� oaf (�rrv�ttnr� clown Of vatt '' +�uii�din� �r�rttr #mrn# THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 306 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING THAT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD- ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE. FOR THE FOLLOWING: Name LANDMARK TOWER (30 Units) POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE Use Classification MULTI - FAMILY CONDOMINIUMS Group H Building Permit No. Type Construction I I Fire Zone 2 Use Zone CC -2 Owner of Building LANDMARK CONDO'S LTD. Buildi ress 91. L' nshead Circle, Vail wilding Wicia September 26, 1975 u '� Date town o tai POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE C�r�ftftrttte �f (�rru�ttnr� clown of Vatt 10 Building Department THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 306 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING THAT AT THE TIME OFISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD- ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE. FOR THE FOLLOWING: Name LANDMARK TOWER (30 Units) Use Classification MULTI - FAMILY CONDOMINIUMS Group H Building Permit No. Type Construction I I Fire Zone 2 Use Zone CC -2 Owner of Building LANDMARK CONDO'S LTD. Build' Tess 9 L' nshe d Circle, Vail t uilding of icia September 26, 1975 Date t own 0 Y81 � POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PLUMBING TYPE OF OCCUPANCY Z AMOUNT EXITS REQ. BUILDING PERMIT Q MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL Q JOB NAME OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL TOTAL FLOOR AREA NAME S CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA W Z MAIL ADDRESS NEW () ALTERATIO � DDITION ( 1 REPAIR 1 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY PH. USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED 0 NAME 40 SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. O FF ST. PARKING H Z Q MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O m V ~ CITY PH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS IRI ILI L) NAM CONDO. LODGE SIDE w F I MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE cc TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER 1 1 FORCED AIR 1 1 ELEC 1 1 UNIT ( 1 Q Ci .i�f BLK FILING COVERING (7 N W w C TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF INT. WALLS FEES A E E PERMIT 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 ill IV V I HR BUILDING /D SPECIFIED YES NO PLAN 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J PLAN CHECK FEES FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING DIVISION 1 2 3 4 WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL APP O 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT P RMIT # SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE pZ GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL L� _ OCCUPANCY SEPARATION `( I HERE CKNOWLED HAT I HAV SOIL TEST READ THIS APPL D STATE THAT ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPL SURVEY WITH Abi TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE La SIGNA;UR E; 5 4 t3ffV?NER DING B LDING CONSTRUCTION. SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER IM pdntary/vaii OR CONTRACTOR 0 August 29, 1975 Chief Building Inspector Mr. Ben Strand Town of Vail Vail, Colorado .Dear Ben, On August 27, 1975 you and myself, Consttuction made an inspection op establish the necessary items no and needed to be completed. As am sending you a list of items not CO's were not investigated in this , ,And Kenneth Paper of er the Landmark project complete, or not up code, result r-th&t-- - Vftection I ice .� The units with temporary report. Commerical Area 1. Deck leaking in hall area adjacent to resturant kitchen (Replace ceiling tile). 2. Close in electrical pipe over stairway leading outside to the West. 3. Replace door on the LeCadeau with a fire rated door. 4. Patch around conduit in the General Store, North wall as well as East wall. 5. Replace ceiling tile in commerical area where damaged by water. Tower Area and Commerical Area 1. Place 1 hour fire rated rock in pool equipment building. 2. Run gas to boiler for pool. 3. Mark fire cabinets. 4. Change present nozzel to varible spray. 5. Close drywall around roof entrance on stair well. 6. Replace step with ramp to give proper headroom with sprinkling system pipes and floor of garage adjacent to elevator. 7. Complete pool. 8. Remove rebar and wire mess from deck and patch. 9. Close all frame with drywall on roof entrance in center stair shaft. r� u Main office 1654 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone 266 -1771 Page Two Individual Units 701 - 705 Temporary CO given 601 -OK 602 - OK 501 - OK 502 - OK 503 Temporary CO 504 Temporary Co 505 - OK 4ol - OK 402 - OK 4o4 - OK 405 - OK 301 Dimmer Switch 302 - OK 303 - OK 3o4 - OK 305 Temporary CO 202 Finish 203 Finish 204 Finish 201 Temporary CO 101 Temporary CO 102 Finish Offices - Finish 103 Finish 105 Finish Sincerely, Dean Southworth r: 0 EDWARD L. VOLPE ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 1025 CAPITOL LIFE BUILDING SIXTEENTH AND GRANT STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 TELEPHONE (303) 534 -5121 July 8, 1975 Mr. Jeffrey B. Selby Gore Range Properties P. O. Box 1528 Vail, CO 81657 Dear Jeff: 0 Over the 4th of July weekend, I had an opportunio be in Vail and to visit Kostas Taverna in the Landmark Buildin I am sure I will be in further contact wi hi_ concerning some discussions I had at that time with both Dic Brown _and Bob Smith. This was my first opportunity to meet Bob, an I can inform you that I was impressed with his sincerety and with his apparent eagerness to cooperate with us. While I was reviewing all matters with Katie, she informed me that plans are presently being made to fill the swimming pool located on the roof of the Landmark commercial building. Because of difficulties which we have had with water damage the building, and because of our knowledge of certain patchwork was required for the swimming pool, Katie expressed some justifiable apprehension concerning the safety of the pool. Of course, I am aware that you are as concerned about the safety of the building and about the safety of any occupants as we are. I will simply request that you relay to me any information which you may have in your possession concerning the structural suitability of the pool for present use. In the event that a current opinion has not been solicited on that matter, then I would urge you to obtain such an opinion prior to filling the pool. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Edward L. Volpe ELV /ml cc: Building Inspector,:Vail, CO 4 TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT JOB NAMK DATE OF APPLICATION ROOF YES I NO COVERED I UNCOVERED FEES BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT OTHER PERMIT # TOTAL 7s6 D� I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE� READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL T WN CES ND STATE LAWS REGAR ING T!ON. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR DATE K NAME(, CLASS OF WORK w Z 3 MAIL ADDRESS J F ju jil NEW () ALTERATION 1 ) ADDITION ( 1 REPAIR 1 1 O CITY V PH. cc NAME t UL L INT. WALLS F Z Q MAIL ADDRESS Q. O FF ST. PARKING O oC CITY PH.1 SETBACKS I v ~ NO. OF LIVING UNITS F- u ui I- NAME EASEMENT = MAIL ADDRESS LODGE U Q CITY PH. ROOF YES I NO COVERED I UNCOVERED FEES BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT OTHER PERMIT # TOTAL 7s6 D� I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE� READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL T WN CES ND STATE LAWS REGAR ING T!ON. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR DATE J i a TOTAL FLOOR AREA CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA NEW () ALTERATION 1 ) ADDITION ( 1 REPAIR 1 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO USE OF BUILDING ® SQ. FT. OF BLDG. INT. WALLS HEIGHT IN FT. FIRE SPRINKLERS O FF ST. PARKING NO. OF STORIES WET STANDPIPE SETBACKS I OFF ST. LOADING NO. OF LIVING UNITS COMB. STANDPIPE FRONT EASEMENT CONDO. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK A LODGE OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IDE (R) (L) SO. FT. COMMERCIAL SURVEY [ REAR VARIANCE TYPE OF HEAT WATER ( ) FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 ROOF YES I NO COVERED I UNCOVERED FEES BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT OTHER PERMIT # TOTAL 7s6 D� I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE� READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL T WN CES ND STATE LAWS REGAR ING T!ON. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR DATE J i a LOT BLK FILING COVERING w w TRACT EXT. WALLS ® 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 111 IV V I HR 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J DIVISION 1 2 3 4 INT. WALLS S P E C I F I E D FIRE SPRINKLERS WET STANDPIPE 3. USE ZONE DRY STAND COMB. STANDPIPE SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK A AREA SEPARATION OCCUPANCY SEPARATION tJO SOIL TEST r SURVEY SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER Uw prinlMNail ROOF YES I NO COVERED I UNCOVERED FEES BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT OTHER PERMIT # TOTAL 7s6 D� I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE� READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL T WN CES ND STATE LAWS REGAR ING T!ON. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR DATE s 'W 0 CONCRETaIELD TEST AND ado b p e COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH REPORT ` cobrado 110917 JW • CLIENT NO 124 -1 1031 saxn (rorxege road west LAB NO 124 1 - (1 - 3) p a box 4 CONCRETE CO Sakr _ vad Colorado 01657 303.4- 5.0297 CONTRACT John Vand�c(:mp oil f ou . n d ation C PROJ T J ngneering TRUCK NO TICKET NO TIME MIXED 11:00 ARRIVED PLACE0 LOC/►TION OF PLACEMENT IN STRUCTURE Patc O DATE OF TEST.... 6/3/75 CONCRETE TEMP. TIME OF TEST.... 11:30 JOB OF SLUMP INCHES.... 3� LAB 56 OF FRESH CONC. WT... NUMBER OF DAYS CURED FCF AIR TEMP. ENT. AIR CONTENT 28 JOB 68 OF SAMPLE CUR 1 NG.. Lab. Std WATER ADDED -GALS 27.37 PLANT 0 JOB SITE CEMENT CONTENT.. PCY 139.4 1.5 -3/ COARSE AGGREGATE 140.0 PCY 34 -j#4 FINE AGGREGATE.. PCY 28.27 j#4 SPECIMEN NUMBER 124 -1 1 -7 2 -28 DATE TESTED 6/10/75 7/1/75 NUMBER OF DAYS CURED 7 7 14 28 28 DIMENSIONS, INCHES STD. CYL 1 N QE R = "X1 Std Std SPECIMEN WEIGHT,POUNDS 27.37 27.49 BSSD DENSITY, PCF 139.4 140.0 AREA OF CYLINDER, IN STD. CYL =28.27 IN 28.27 28.27 TOTAL T EST LOA D,POUNDS S3400 87000 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PSI 1889 3077 SPECIFIED STRENGTH PSI 4000 4000 TYPE OF FRACTURE: 1) DIAGONAL SHEAR 2) CONE 3) VERTICAL SPLIT 1 1 REMARKS MIX NUMBER...... SPECIFICATIONS.. DESIGNED BY..... CU YDS PLACED... CU YDS TRUCK LOADING... CU YDS WATER CONTENT... GAL/LD WATER- CEMENT.... 1 gal /S kRATIO ADMIXTURE....... AEA OZ/YD CALCIUM CHLORIDE % SAMPLED BY S. Schroeder ESTED BY S. Schroeder SIGNED F ORM C -1 TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING BUILDING PERMIT Z PLUMBING TYPE OF OCCUPANCY AMOUNT EXITS REG. Q MECHANICAL ' Q ELECTRICAL JOB NAME �ly�L� 'e ' N �N! > OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL TOTAL FLOOR AREA 2 NAME 1 ►J CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w Z 3 MAIL ADDRESS h m NEW () ALTERATION (► ADDITION ( ► REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY V j q I L PH. USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED 0O J NAME y �J SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. OFF ST. PARKING Z Q MAIL ADDRESS cX7 NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING 0 cc V ~ CITY V P H. 1 � 6 NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS w NAME ,)or k CONDO. LODGE (R) ILI L SIDE F- = U MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE r' ¢ TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER ( ) FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 J < LVi LOT BLK FILING COVERING w w TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF INT. WALLS FEES A 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V 1 HR BUILDING PERMIT lo a 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J DIVISION 1 2 SPECIFIED YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK 3 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL AP 3. USE ZONE ::=[ DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT In P RMIT # ' 111 Emil I l SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER GENERAL D SCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL ►j �+ a OCCUPANCY SEPARATION /C '4 �1 I E ACKLE THATVEE �� / j ► �l r Q READ THI APPL ►�J ` SOIL TEST D STATE THAT TH ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPL r -4 l- �` � SURVEY WITH ALL WN ORDINANCES AND STAT �� AWS REGARDING (� J �/ � e � SPECIAL INSPECTOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. J Va t ' ` PLA NUMBER � � kl / L -u � 7Y J- 7 SI NATURE OF NER OR CONTRACTOR i COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND SANITATION A C T I V I T Y R E P 0 R T Section Code 73 County j-:'- FILE REFERENCE: 7 INDIVIDUAL OR ESTABLISHMENT: K//C - s Ile /1/- ADDRESS: NARRATIVE: A) 4 -re / /L,, -� ►�� l�/� � Z� f�f/�_ 7 /t­/-) &txp �pn 111-4 T 7,#e- t'k 7 - 7 1,r L lt�r re' Z t U 77"Zll t LETTER TO FOLLOW: OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS : DATE: REPRESENTATIVE: ES: 7 (Rev. 6-70-100) ;� � �,� � �1'•1 � C ���- EDWARD. L. VOLPE ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 1025 CAPITOL LIFE BUILDING SIXTEENTH AND GRANT STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 TELEPHONE (303) 534 -5121 April 15, 1975 Mr. Dana C. Rickli 4045 South Broad Englewood, C "A-7 fl e: Kostas Taverna Dear Dan: .4F� ?c Enclosed please find a copy of the information which I have received from Cipra, Inc. concerning the necessary alteration in the duct work leading from the kitchen area of the above designated restuarant. As I advised you by telephone, the restuarant will be closed to the public by the weekend of April 19 and 20, 1975, and will not be reopened until approximately June 15, 1975. During the interim period, the managers of the restuarant hope to have all ducting problems corrected. In addition, we are hopeful that the owners of the Landmark Building, with your guidance and assistance, will be able to correct the water leakage problems attendant to the deck and swimming pool located on the top of the Landmark Commercial Building. Thank you for your cooperation th' matter. truly yours, , Y Edward L. Volpe . f x � ELV:njh Z-A �� �� � ' � ���fw ��Yi4 .:j� .� S ., �t�.I�a � Y. � Iq " 7m Tm:n 'oqz: f M, 't7 • tx 5` FIBS ;r -- tc- Tj 0\1 fr )JA q clti- 7 1 7 Joe _ ING fro tx 5` FIBS ;r -- tc- Tj 0\1 fr )JA q clti- 7 1 7 Joe _ ING ' > , a ._ r v.G- �? S ' S ��� i i °y i •X #+ k ' v ' �q..z � h i t s��x �� �i n�i !i .` "� f i ' • �i r �t!t, , r- '� . :' ta - 1 �.� " '� j .. 3 ' '^' ���,•7•..w.r y �"'��'..r • . rhj ,��t .��7}Fir��rrr.. ; ,{' t A � : Z�c :wYil�. .,�5•.Tir,l .�' � Fk. .2 ' �,,.� .,y y: y,. }p.y. -i t v r i J..q+�• - r + +:i�� . 7 � 1 4„+J{ y I`rµz fi f r t rr'`a { -LRyj3 iy I 4.a f i }Y Ti, �4 1 Y [ r 1 i i S4 � r k , ..f` 9 ra- °V�,y� • .a- .11 - •1 1 ,� � s: +f•z � �r !� _. �1'i. n' � „ > '^ � : {'nX►'X. - � �.{ ' i�Ty ,{. '..i'F 'r.'s s- .+•. � y'.' -.. �:'Y; r� �' M1� 1�: , -�- -$ � R �� "f'1Tj +�� ,,99 �_,,�_. _a:.. ' ' �� "",F _ r 4 •�+' .5�� �S' �•�� '` , -- -W f .F,�f1 3i ' q �fiJ'rijtS t"i `: .. tf: r � r:• q{�' t +�"''^" � - 1 ds�-t i•• Q p Yl-'�s •i ��T �f ! y r ' y -'�' T'Fr �•t `1.. t- r � S -+;r a •` x�. t } 7 p _ _ . t +�,1'[.ds �,•I: j, _ '4~ . L•lrl! `"� �." -+fi !„�.yg � = �--�;T - °�y l ��d s `.I i an� �" r th •sf_.!. �' a ,1G T'+ �.- � 1 .� � � i �� y y , . ' y^7ti1 '.1, _ A^ f - J� 1 ••9"lYs� - y � �.r- , ..�.Z }x -�., - _ -"--- - � i aim° N1 t• { r .:� ;r : Y t � ...# 1 sir R - - 4u�' i .f' - . 4 f Y5'iy. Y'_I ri t — , _ H V L u ' 1 . ~� p� • air yFj1 -j;;a" ±: � +, �d.f:'i A•T` r -"' 1 M•"t` 1•S'_ ``, . °:i- s. *1 ,.�_ j ,'�C_`_ _ `'" Tf' ,t ""^'� � �_ 4 • i C �' - � '1 red ms's? -'Y"w i = v,Y T'�..<' 7� r i x• r" - ''t , LI A..t "�1 ...;. r i . r .. c l7r ,�/ y %i �r ,� t .. -} t •+ - 'T - 1 4 r•',t4 '.r at 'd'�jw.-l'� rS _ �''.' ,N-t1. �� x :4 S ,�_} �' . e +- "4" ,� � i � � ..� I tt�e'? .i.» �r :rl r - a „ g w ^ , `_ r .1'.- i'�.' e - j ��� ° �. �? y �- a1:• r,l .,{_ ";� .. ^ Y .-iS+ S ` �n"9► -++�? .P'�.-.+q�tr*,J�i ru� �7'"�,a' - ` �-+t ��+r- .��`°L'ic_.�7,'- a,'�i'»,e,- �t✓.'; .a -fit+ c.:'�?`"y. ^ +s�. K +�.'._ _ - c 'w '. r•,•t • �� `3yt i- K L £ Z ' .�`S..chTe� . 0 i 4 "Yi i .. + v V6 -r'' -•', y r r - ,, ' , - ..•L `r }r :� - C ,.•!4Y . ' ��i � i � '+ a� Y t ay 3 � � `�% r1� � T .'� f '� �. �r �!..t � r, rs y. .n... Ti J.^ . AA r,,, �.k f ' VF ac- ^'sa S"` 1C`: r� T t7 :.a a T s � •�tt t t - mac; -.... Y� <h r. y.: ?K.i'. �"�cti� :�t. f'L'�'' J•. _elf �'St'} s Y l i •fir s �,�y `.� f. � Y / jF �C v.. L i l l a r /1. t� ;-t� M + " I, Y r `i`- ..�... :may" � f' `5>&t 'E`t'i s1 Ate► zt � f^'��6 ' �. •' - 1 z aN ft r + r e?� s`'' t`t' • L a ` {� ♦Q . r _ °t w.• " �_¢+Xr . h' 'q y Ct'•-. 4 4 A 4ti K a1 t .i� � +�. �.'.. �r � e•t �: 2, F` / p.. :r a• '��?rr r i�.�P .+ •ii �.s, `' 1 's.3 , -.. z � d,.- Y: ,R f ri ��':..'akt •ra ,-. � •e• '�• 4 tF a '" r•.' a '.i ° Y3_ h.,s Yt iT' t 5���_ � � � � .: 1. -�s -��r x i �: ` a ,r•: s v� � a. - x � �i'�ti - '+ rte 3 °t,l r ._, i : J r � -� '� ! ` t• rT'- 'tF':l•a - � � � 7a �. i � � " � a .r- r � v { ��w�,� ..t "'�k' �'f Tr t * ''a l j - :_ � - / s / xR 4,x � +' 'S ► �`- y `.� �. v �.ir>, r- ,7a„I �'� �- � S�� {zt r { _ � �jy f ,+ �, ��T� ^" � ' k3 : A " � t• � -, i � •r � �. ° `s' YE4 1 x tAffi; t•£°`.ee+ t.� � � 1 � � /* �' v � �' �j � r � :..�, r ' ze1 ag �''�`ya�'w ;._.1`� ,<_"�.t y 'c ,, �1'` x ,�"•'�''"- 'r 51, � r) P. ~ +� i ; - - { * a s v< K YY�*' y�;'q` bt+ ! +.�., of ate a r ;T p r " ' { 3 r'a ' i,' '� �- y , ,3r x L .T ' �i' J.n .i �.'n<, • L � t , =tT?• ,si r' k '" ."J ;i o �k s17,,.'>` .. t , "" `b hy.' r _ - 1 ti ,.. x k .� � � z �_ _ s", r � �+ rF"•'t4� "�ri _:a F c �.Nj+a,7. -0' � -�.• f. � 1L 4r � `r e .;. [w - �.C. y ' . L+ � ..x'.1 K3 j' 4 A•a'4 •4�. - .�!.Z , X' y } t.. i• Y t T T _ t. F a 3't }.. 1 � I y -� .~ - _y6-,✓ � , f ,zt{ i' F, :vt it, �4. L •,t �r� Lr _,,,_,�� s r x ,� Ir G� ! C u - •'.`� l �#' t iR '�'•..ti. .�t� ;� z j -�' f �, —,kz � � va.•. 1 'S+'P} c .�r .�r 1 A s •l` F i' �.. �" , c f - �� � -, � t '::gip � _ �• � ��- �-, � � >: - t .,� �-�,� i � ;�� � :., -�. � �, ,, � � - , •; - 1 Ar VAIL' OF - ER E JOB R ATfL 1iM i T3�15� N THE _ , . # , r QtitRED .TO HE O CONSTR TIO 1 77 Iq� DANA CHRISTOPHER WICKLI ARCHITECT 4045 S. BROADWAY - SUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD - COIORADO.789-4525 15 April 1975 Mr. Ben Strahan Town of Vail Building Official Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Landmark Dear Ben, Enclosed is a copy of product information on Ocean No. 432 Intumescent Flat Fire Retardant Varnish. We would like your approval to use this product on the corridor doors in question on the above project. Please advise me of your decision. Sin erely, A" Dana C. Rickli, Architect DCR /clm Enclosure ■ f . PRODUCT INFORMATION OCEAN NO. 432 INTUMESCENT THE FINEST fN FLAT FIRE RETARDANT VARNISH FIRE RETARDANT COATINGS ENFR -A Ocean No. 432 Flat Fire Retardant Varnish has been developed for general use on interior paneling and woodwork. It is not re- commended for floors. The varnish dries to a smooth velvety flat transparent finish which is durable and has good fire re- tardant properties. A Class B rating with a Flame Spread of 35 is attainable when applied in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. Ocean No. 432 is an intumescent type coating, i.e., when the varnish is exposed to flame it puffs to form a thick insulating crust. The crust prevents the penetration of heat to the under surface of combustible material. Areas subject to constant scuffing and handling such as doors, door frames and wainscoating should be protected with a coat of Ocean No. 420 Semi - gloss over the No. 432. This gives added durability, cleansability and maximum moisture resistance. APPLICATION: Ocean No. 432 Fire Retardant Varnish is a heavy bodied, viscous liquid which brushes out well when thoroughly stirred. Apply in heavy coats avoiding excessive brush -out. Do not thin unless abs._lutely necessary. If thinning is essential for spray appli- cat`on use only a minimum amount of HIGH FLASH NAPHTHA (Solvesso- `• 100 or equal). Do not use lacquer thinners, toluenes or 4. _"r5entine, etc., for thinning. Some whiting may appdar if mate- r is excessively thir:ned or applied to unevenly sealed surfaces. ' = ^u coat of No. 432 will correct this condition. a be fi I seed should be clean and dry, free from wax or = '? =�e• F lirg and staining should be done before applying the oaf ^'s Porous surfaces should be sealed with a coat of Oce }r " Q2k� varr:is^ or with a clear alkyd base sealer. On previously coated surfaces wash down thoroughly and sand to en- sure proper ad^esior. Test patch the old finish for lifting before startin the work. _ DENT V C0- 80' 2 PHvil.Nl: 935-3_5 OCE AN ` "MI'NIt AVS IN 440 Ma¢azine .avenue P. O. Sox 1667 Savammah, Georgia 31402 ft_ 1236 �Af Je PRODUCT INFORMATION tMf r //!lT 7.1 cia at.�O.MT � tOtllMf — 2 — APPLICATION: (Continued) Application may be by brush or spray. Heavy duty spray equip- ment is recommended. The varnish should be applied at the rate of 200 sq. ft. per U.S. Gallon. Two coats are required to achieve flame spread rating as shown on Underwriters' label. The varnish sets dust -free in 2 - 4 hours, but from 24 - 48 hours should be allowed before recoating. O CEAN NO. 420 SEMI -GLOSS OVERCOAT FOR NO. 432 GENERAL: Ocean No. 420 Semi -gloss Varnish is a specially developed over - coating for Ocean No. 432 flat fire retardant varnish. The two products are rated as a system as will be seen on the Under- writers' label. The use of Ocean No. 420 over the No. 432 improves moisture resistance, increases durability and cleansability and seals in the fire retardant qualities of the no. 432. APPLICATION: sealer. At s of surfaces hoursdrying4 s e s i es ouldbeallowed bePo - re applying the No. 4 32. Spreading rate is about 650 sq. ft. per U.S. Gallon. Application may be by brush or spray. Should thin- ning be necessary, use only a minimum amount of MINERAL SPIRITS Do not use other solvents for thinning. Under no circumstances should Ocean No. 420 be mixed with No 432 Use only the speci- fied solvent for each product. i OCEAN (.HFMTCALS INC. 440 Magazine Avenue P. 0. Box 1667 Savannah. Geor- 31402 234- !.':3u F� box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 • office of ttie town manager April 2, 1975 1ADUNiARK AT LIONNSII� 4 SOUTH POMUN OF LOY 1 BLOCK 1, VA IL /LIO TRIM FILING / TO MICAI IT MAY CONCERN This is to certify that the following units in the Tower of the above mentioned project are hereby granted a Cerficate of Occupancy for the purpose of human habitation: UNIT 602 — The above is granted with the understanding that this is only a partial Certificate of Occupancy and that human occupancy of the remaining units within the building will not be so authorized until final inspection of that remaining portion is complete and a Certif- icate of Occupancy is issued by the Town of Vail Camrn zity Development Department for'the total building. Sincerely, t DEPAIM, LINT OF Bennett B, Strahan Chief Building Official of Quil box 100 office of the town manager vail, colorado 81657 (303)• 476 -5613 LANDMARK AT L ONSHEAD SOUTH FORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, UA /LIONSHEAD THIRD FI G TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to certify that the following units in the Tower of the above mentioned project are hereby granted a Certificate of Occupancy for the purpose of human habitation: UNITS 701 — 702 " 703 - 704 705 4 503 - 4 504 - 305 " 101 - 201 -2, The above is granted with the understanding that this is only a partial Certificate of Occupancy and that human occupancy of the remaining units within the building will not be so authorized until final inspection of that remaining is complete and a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the total building. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT 0)' COM`" ENT Bennett B. Strahan Chief Building Official SHEET METAL CONTRACTORS, FABRICATORS 2065 SOUTH CHEROKEE . DENVEP.,COLORADO 80223 • PHONE 744 -3521 March 25, 1975 Mr. Ed Volpe Suite 1025 Capitol Life Building Denver, Colorado E: Landmark- Vail Cipra, Inc. Quote X95 1 Gentlemen: In response to your request, I have looked at the subject job. In order to revise the ductwork, per your information, the following is a summary, and an approximate cost, of the work necessary to gain acceptance by the City of Vail: 1. Revise ductwork to move louver approximately 8' north of existing location. Install 2 manual dampers at hoods. Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,000.00 2. Provide and install new carbon filters with pre- filter and associated ducting. Cost. . . . . . . . . . $ 1,900.00 Note: Carbon filters to be recharged twice a year. Approximate cost . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 700.00 Pre - filters changed 4 times a year. Cost. . . . $ 60.00 3. Provide and install new fan(if required), to operate at 3" static pressure. Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,490.00 Please note that we have made no provision for electrical wiring or cutting and patching in these prices. These estimates are approximate values, but should be very close. Mr. Ed Volpe March 25, 1975 Page 2. If you decide to go on all, or part of the work, we would prefer to do this on a Time and Material Basis in order to give you any advantages possible. Also, the prices are good only until July 1, 1975, at which time we anticipate a wage increase. Respectfully submitted, CIPRA, INC. Max M. Madsen Vice President MMM /mcj • DANA CHRZE3TOPHER `4CICKLZ ARCHIrrH;CT 4045 S. BROADWAY - BUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 7894525 19 March 1975 Mr. Bennett B. Strahan Chief Building Official Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Landmark Condominiums Dear Ben, Enclosed is a sketch for the restructuring of the vent opening which is to be relocated. The design of the new vent arrangement and grease trap will be done by Cipra Company of Denver. There seems to be another problem concerning the corridors. The walls will be finished to the structure with two layers of 5/8'' drywall (taped) and the hole in the concrete wall will be closed up also. The contractor says that you told him the doors (paneled) do not meet the 3/4 -hour requirement for a 1 -hour corri- dor. We would like to be allowed to apply a 3/8'' plywood skin on the inside of these six doors to the offices, storage and restaurant. This would effectively increase the door thickness from 1 and 3/8'' to 1 and 3/4'' which is required. We have metal frames and to replace the doors would require that the frames be replaced also. With the veneer arrangement we can accomplish the same thing and keep the frames. The restaurant main entrance is 1 and 3/4'' solid core and the kitchen door is a hollow metal door, therefore these are already qualified. Mr. Bennett B. Strahan 19 March 1975 Page 2 The door between the hall and the toilets is only a divider and, I feel, doesn't need to be qualified in any manner. (It could be removed and not change the cor- ridor situation). Your consideration will be greatly appreciated. Tha you. Dana C. Rickli, AIA DCR /clm Enclosure: Sketch • NO of — Voi 11 Iy box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 Alexander - Rickli Architects 4045 South Broadway Suite 204 Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Mr. Rickli: • office of the town manager March 14, 1975 I am responding to our conversation last Thursday, March 6, 1975, on the kitchen vent system in the Landmark at Lionshead Building, Kostos Taverna. As you have said, and I agree, the location of the outside vent grill should be moved to its location as shown on the plans. In regard to this would you please submit a design of the re- structuring of the existing opening to this Office for consideration. Also have your mechanical engineer design a filtering system in the outside vent with a grease trap that can be maintained on a weekly basis. Please submit a copy of the design plan to this office for consideration. It is not the most desirable solution for the problem, and it will have to be strictly maintained on a weekly basis to be effective at all. If at any time we feel that is is not being properly maintained, we will reserve the right to reconsider the problem in hopes of arriving at a different solution. Your cooperation and immediate consideration of this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMU ITY DEVE ANT Bennett B. Strahan Chief Building Official BBS /j k Rickli March 14, 1975 Page Two cc: (1) Jeff Selby P.O. Box 1528 Vail, Colorado 81657 (2) Kostos Taverna Attention: Kattie Theos P.O. Box 2159 Vail, Colorado 81657 (3) Meir Construction Company Golden, Colorado • WE 011 1 'a , i I Y box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 Mr. Joseph Levin Landmark at Lions',,ead Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mr. Levin: 0 - office of the town manager March 5, 1975 This letter is to confirm our agreement earlier today in regards to the clean -up around your building, Landmark at Lionshead. At the snow melts this spring and building depris and waste become exposed, they shall be cleaned -up. If we find that this is not being done, we will notify you in writing, giving you three (3) days in which to remedy the situation. If after that time period yQu have not done so, we will have out people do the work deduct the cost from your deposit. Your concern in this matter will be greatly appreciated. BBS/ j k Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Bennett B. Strahan Chief Building Official E e R+ JAN 181975 �p iful ° R. W. MIER CONST CO r S Af �' 1100 SIMMS STREET P. O. DRAWER 10776 - EDGEMONT STATION ., AMEa�� .• ` "` LAKEWOOD, COLORADO GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 PHONE: 232 -6455 January 9,1975 Jerry Aldrich c/o Joseph Levin P. 0. Box 580 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: k at Lionshead Va i 1 ro a c"L� m ,.v Dear Sir: The Contract for construction of above referenced project was entered into between Mr. Joseph Levin and this Company on May 22, 1973. Very truly yours, R. W. MIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY b DR /hma TOWN OF V A I L NAME VoI d BUILDING I ACCEPTED cc Z PLUMBING BUILDING PERMIT ° 1 3 4 Z 3 Q MECHA YES O a ELECTRICAL 1 28 PLAN CHECK CITY V 4 A F PH. V 0O NAME r JOB NAME I OTHER TOTAL DATE OF AP ' 19 7 It 3. USE ZONE ERA DESCRIPTION OF WORK ��1 Il_ 1 n j , r 4 PLAN NUMBER n APPLICATION IN I. YYALLJ Rid 1 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION NAME VoI d IV V I HR I ACCEPTED cc A B C D E 6 G H I J • DIVISION w 1 3 4 Z 3 MAIL ADDRESS SPECIFIED YES O PLAN CHECK FEES 1 28 PLAN CHECK CITY V 4 A F PH. V 0O NAME r Gr' Q MAILA�D S v Z �G, om V ~ / DRESS CITY y PHI' U NAME H ELECTRICAL = MAIL ADDRESS V COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT Q CITY PH. OTHER RMIT # 47 AREA SEPARATION J TOTAL S LOT BLK FILING ai W W OCCUPANCY SEPARATION -I C TRACT 3. USE ZONE ERA DESCRIPTION OF WORK ��1 Il_ 1 n j , r 4 PLAN NUMBER n APPLICATION IN I. YYALLJ Rid 1 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 0 111 IV V I HR I ACCEPTED 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E 6 G H I J • DIVISION BUILDING PERMIT 1 3 4 3. USE ZONE ERA DESCRIPTION OF WORK ��1 Il_ 1 n j , r 4 PLAN NUMBER n APPLICATION IN I. YYALLJ Rid 1 FEES I ACCEPTED BUILDING PERMIT SPECIFIED YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES 1 28 PLAN CHECK FIRE SPRINKLERS V PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL PPROVAL DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT A ;P E SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER RMIT # 47 AREA SEPARATION TOTAL S ! � l - 54 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE _ SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY SURVEY ✓ WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE SPECIAL INSPECTOR LAWS EGARD NG ILD G CO UCTION. ZONING r.. [] PUS WKS- ___....._._. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY AMOUNT EXITS RED. _F -2 14-�. 2 m� TOTAL FLOOR ARE COVERED I UNCOVERED DATE 1 ud"'Ai 41vjA;-,A SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR "W Vr I October 25, 1374 Mr. Edward L. Volpe 1025 Capitol Life Building Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Mr. Volpe In reference to our telephone conversation this date, it appears that two of the proposed 10' make -up air units rill be sufficient to facilitate the additional ventilation required clue to limitdU glass area in the dining room of the Kostas 'iaverna Restaurant. In accordance with Section 1105 of the Uniform building Code, natural light and ventilation can be provided by windows or skyliatits of an area not less than 1 /8th the total floor area, one -half openable. In the event of no openings or limited openings, a mechanically operated system shall be provided. In this instance, the proposed area is provided with openings but insufficient to totally comply; therefore, a mechanically operated syste:a shall be provided. If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to contact my office.' Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jerry L. Aldrich Chief Building Official J LA / wam , %W r, Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N°_ 99 Building Valuation $---------------------------- B"aJ Electrical Valuation $...... 4 1 42�Q.,__.... Job Name _' `/ ,/l�.EP__ C /_.l•�e Date of Application. � 1...................................... 19.�c�... Electrical Contractor ................. ----------------- ..'.... ......... C........ Applicant -•- -- -------- •- - - - - -- --- --------------------------- Signature APPROA Permit Fee $ .......... InspectionFee $-- ......... --------- -- ..................................................... Plan Checker Total Fee ..................... .. C of Building Official Date Paid----------------- - - - --� -7� THIS FORM IS TO Received By .....................��1. JOB SITE DURING 'ALS . ....... ...... ...... ............................... Date !�� ..... 'A Date BE POSTED ON CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. F. MOECEEI CO.. DENVER 301311 F111 JAN 61975 Cetcate of Orruvanry U own (Of vait Blttlhtltg UPpMxtIllPltZ THIS CERTIFICATfi ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION .306 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING TIIAT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VARIOUS ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN REGULATING BUILD— ING CONSTRUCTION OR USE. FOR THE FOLLOWING: N a111e KOSTAS TAVERNA C R es t auran t F -2 U se Cias.;ificatian Croup ? Y Building Permit No.. 18 7 __Type Construction V Fire Zcne 3 Use Zone r Owner of Building co re Range Properties — >3� din Address L Y fi r — Bu;ldi ng Official i -- - -- -- U Jan 75 _ to p 0 V o l ;y t /., { POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE (410 qL[ DEC 111974 j L/ Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT I N2 88 Building Valuation $ ......................... Electrical Valuation 6 x ----------- ___ Permit Fee $ Inspection Fee $... 7.(;?. -_ 0 0 ....... Total Fee $...1. 7, ........ Date Paid ..... ko. 7 Y. 9.;:?- ..................... Received By ..... ....•........•• ...... Job Name-,. ........ .......................... Date of Application -- - - - --1 ---------- 2 ------------_--------------- 19 .. Electrical Contractor ...... ----------- .................... Applicant . ..... ......... ....... . ..... .................................. ......... ............ Signature APPROVALS ............ ......................... ­­ ................................... ....................... ................ JONn Checker Date ............................................................ ........... V_ .............. 2 Official Date THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. r. HCECKEL CO., DENVER 201211 L - - -- - -, S I ��n syl a Y %j. �11 t FT- u 1 U Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N°_ 98 Building Valuation $_______________ _________ _ _ __ ; J c Electrical Valuation $ ------- � Permit Fee Inspection Fee $ ......... r� $ ........... - e �__............. Total Fee 1 � Date Paid .......... I_,1,. A. ! /-.. 2- - - .-/. Received By - - -• -- --------- ••- - - - -•- `e 111 DEC 2 71974 / a /z t / Job Name- - - - - -- . ............ . i� ",/ .................................... 4 N/'0" /7 / X--+.r J2 ,t A? •'�.'l1r5 Date of Application.' L--- �-- �---------------------- 19 JJ ..................... Electrical Contractor__._ .t'_s_s __________ _ ___ Ar�G Applicant---------- ---------------- ------- - ------------------------------------------ Signature - APPROVALS -•••-•••-•••••••••-•-••--•••••••--••••••••----------------------------- - - - - -- ................................... .. Plan Checker Date Chief Building Official Date THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. F. MOECEEL CO., DENVER 301311 E] PLUMBING /MECHANICAL PERMIT TOWN OF VAI L DATE JOB NAME OWNER ADDRESS CONTRACTOR PHONE USE OF BUILDING: CLASS OF WORK: ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION DESCRIPTION OF WORK: ❑ REMODEL ❑ REPAIR PLUMBING: NUMBER MECHANICAL: NUMBER VALUATION $ VALUATION $ REMARKS: REMARKS: PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE ❑ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE TOTAL FEES: $ 1 BUILDING TOWN OF V A I L Z PLUMBING BUILDING PERMIT �07 MECHA Q Q ELECTRICAL TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REQ. JOBNAME OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL TOTAL FLOOR AREA CC. NAME CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w z MAIL ADDRESS NEW ( 1 ALTERATION ( 1 ADDITION ( 1 REPAIR ( I FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY PH. USE OF BUILDING CC O NAME SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. OFF ST. PARKING H z Q MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O cr U ~ CITY PH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT — EASEMENTS IRI ILI U NAME CONDO. LODGE SIDE F— = MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE ¢ TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR ( I ELEC 1 1 UNIT 1 1 J LOT BILK FILING COVERING w w —1 0 TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF APPLICATION INT. WALLS FEES ACCEPTED 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 II III IV V I HR BUILDING PERMIT 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J S P E C I F I E D YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK DIVISION 1 2 3 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL APPROVAL 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER PERMIT fr ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL OCCUPANCY SEPARATION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR COVERED I UNCOVERED DATE 1 TOWN OF V A I L ' M;AIV ' C BUILDING PLUMBING BUILDING PERMIT z NEW 1 1 ALTERATION ( 1 A ( 1 REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO Q MECHA ELECTRICAL Q CITY PH. USE OF BUILDING NO O JOB NAME SQ. FT. OF BLDG. OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REQ. TOTAL FL OOR AREA ¢ ' M;AIV ' C CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w z MAIL ADDRESS NEW 1 1 ALTERATION ( 1 A ( 1 REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY PH. USE OF BUILDING NO O NAME SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J OFF ST. PARKING H PLUMBING z Q MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES WET STANDPIPE SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O [c U ~ CITY PH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT 3. USE ZONE - EASEMENTS ELECTRICAL IRI ILI w NAME CLEAN UP DEPOSIT CONDO. LODGE SIDE SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE N PERMIT # ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION = MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL IHEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IHAVE REAR SOIL TEST VARIANCE L) TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER I 1 FORCED AIR ( 1 ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( 1 SPECIAL INSPECTOR LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. PLAN NUMBER J cn C a l b LOT BLK FILING COVERING SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR w w -j 0 TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF APPLICATION COVERED I UNCOVERED DATE INT. WALLS FEES ACCEPTED 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 II III IV V I HR BUILDING PERMIT S P E C I F I E D YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING DIVISION 1 2 3 4 WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL APPROVAL 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER PERMIT # ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IHEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IHAVE SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE SPECIAL INSPECTOR LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. PLAN NUMBER SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR COVERED I UNCOVERED DATE S �nruiNr±� . [. n PUB WKS.------ - - - - -- TOWN OF V A I L BUILDING _ �_— PLUMBING TYPE OF OCCUPANCY AMOUNT EXITS RED. Z BUILDING PERMIT ° MECHANICAL �� t Q ELECTRICAL JOB NAME QFFI�C OTHER DATE OF APPLICATION 19 TOTAL l 2 Q TOTAL FLOOR AREA cc NAME CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w z MAIL ADDRESS NEW 1 1 ALTERATION ( ADDITION ( I REPAIR 1 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O CITY L PH. USE OF BUILDING COVERED7 UNCOVERED cc NAME SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. OFF ST. PARKING 0 z Q MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O cc U ~ CITY dw S SPH. NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS U w NAME CONDO. LODGE SIDE (RI (L) F- = MAIL ADDRESS SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE o�[ TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER ( 1 FORCED AIR ( I ELEC ( 1 UNIT ( I J C7 LU LOT BLK FILING COVERING w w J O TRACT EXT. WALLS ROOF W06 0 NN9 APPLICATION INT-VVALLS 4::Wyp FEES ACCEPTED 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1 11 III IV V I R BUILDING PERMIT S P E C I F I E D YES NO PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E ©G H I J DIVISION ln 3 4 FIRE SPRINKLERS PLUMBING WET STANDPIPE MECHANICAL PPROVAL 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL COMB. STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE OTHER P ERMIT = 1 GEN L DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION TOTAL _ OCCUPANCY SEPARATION v V I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE �+✓�:. SOIL TEST READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE V ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY _ a SURVEY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS GARDI NG CO S RUCTION. / SPECIAL INSPECTOR �/ PLAN NUMBER 7 7 6-7 Yj ha— SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR VOW ad Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N°_ 76 Building Valuation $---------------------------- 0 00 - 4 J Electrical Valuation $ ............................ Permit Fee $.......... ` - -- ca3. _ Inspection Fee $---- - - - - -- ------ -- - - - - -- Cam Total Fee $ .............. C3 ....... Date Paid ......... ............ . ....� � L (• 7 - -. - -- Received By ............................... I' ----- Job Name.'t5 ... . ►� r-0 ' 1v. b �, ---------- - - - --- -_.. .... Date of Application...... /...... /... --------- •----------- ----------------- 19 - ---- - - - - -- Electrical Contractor... ....... _ ---- - - - - -- i... ... Applicant....... - --- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ Sign APPROVALS ................................................. ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------- Pl Checker Date IL J a [[R , .._... _ _____ --------- ............ 4.1 .... t\, :7. ..... Ch f Buildi Official Date THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. E. HOECKEL CO., DENVER 701711 0 0 A DANA CHRI RICKLI November 1}th, 1.974 i►� ���� � . C;715:1 r 4046 E3. BFiOAA W'AY • ST-TIT-t-' 804 EN"GLLWOOD COLORADO 789•�kJC.S Mr, Jerry Aldrich Chief Bldg, Official Vail, Colorado Re: Back flow valves Vantage Point and ' Landmark Deter Jerry: As discussed in our conversation on Thursday, October 31st, 1974 we are proceedine, as follows: The owner will install drains on each vertical standpipe unit, (u on Vantage Point and 2 oa Landmark and also install a :low switch on each sy.^,Cem to alert the fire department should the system malfunction. Yours truly, DANA CHRI STOPHE RC �� Dana C. Rickli DCR:nc %we E Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N2 71 Building Valuation Electrical Valuation Permit Fee $ ---------------------------- $ Inspection Fee $ ----------- ;�� ............ Total Fee ---- = Date Paid ........................ 12 � / Received By ...................... .......... Job Name. uNfa- — ......... Date of Application ...... 2 ...... © T ............................... 19.7 .. 4 ........... Electrical Contractor...NI�Ar .... IG�L .. .... ... ( .................................... Applicant ----------- - - - - -- .........•................ .........•..•..............................•...............•. Signature APPROVALS #r -�:6hec - ke Dat a . r ------------- ---------------- ---------------------------- •-- ......................... B.Z -- -- --------------------------------------------- n2 Official Date THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. F. HOECKEL CO., OC.VER 301311 �Fl4E OCT 2 3 1974 Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT N2 67 Building Valuation $ ---------------------------- Electrical Valuation _______ $��� _ .................... Permit Fee $ ------- Inspection Fee $ .......... Total Fee ..... DatePaid ....................... `l - - - -- -- -- - - - -- Received By-- ..------- •-- .-- -.../U � ..... ......... Job Name - -- ^' e" �/ ✓6 - - - - -. �b jrN A 1- - j ( C ad .-------•--.-•.------ 2- C/ Date of Application........... ..._.�. ._ .............. 19- 7............... Electrical Contractor... --------- - - -• -- - -•- -. ---------------------- Applicant... APPROVALS --------------------------------------------------- ------------ •- •------- - - -• -- .---- ................................... P lan Checker Date -< j - e_ r.4 = -- - - - - -- 2-T ............... -- •-- ...... .... - - - -. hief Buii ng Official Date THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. F. HOECKEI CO., CENVEM 301311 AU6 Town of Vail ELECTRICAL PERMIT Job Name---- - - -� -� 6 'L l`� .................................. Date of Application--------------- �- . l, � L. ( ��q ---------------------------•• - N 0 2 9 Electrical Contractor..........k '� C Building Valuation $----- ----------------- - - - - -- Applican - - -- ................ � - - - -- ......... Irla s...Sana y signa Electrical Valuation $------------ •--- •--- •-- -_ -•.� APPROVAL Permit Fee $........25: �Z�... oty Inspection Fee $...... �... �..: -� - - - - -- a az _... .o.�m... . . \ J Checker Date Total Fee $ ......._ ------- ---------•--------------------------- ...--- •----------- •• - - -••- --- - - - - -- ------------------------ f Building Official Date Y � �j DatePaid ...................................... .......• - - -- THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON Received By .............. ................. 'A--- -• - - -- JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 24 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS THE C. E. NOECKEL CO.. DENVER 301311 • PLUMBING /MECHANICAL PERMIT TOWN OF VAI L \� DATE / / f 17q OB�IAME �, — 1 "E- 6_El.3 lC OWNER ADDRESS Ldt sb/",,d, CONTRACTOR -i EV0C a q C,- 0 H0NE - 4 ' ZC, �ZZ USE OF BUILDING: �Sy i � ci . CLASS OF WORK: LT NEW 11 ADDITION ❑ REMODEL ❑REPAIR DESCRIPTION OF WORK: LA i El L4 PLUMBING: NUMBER 7��J MECHANICAL: NUMBER VALUATION $ t VALUATION $ REMARKS: REMARKS: PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE aA APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE a ;t TOTAL FEES: $ 1 5 rl '71 4. n J Ft ti X it jct sl 1 p. fz MW m p 1 IZ I( l i , �*, I I � I �'�I ;:� -,bi � u ) i _ _ � � � (3 } �i N �l -i J C Z4 I I WHO a rl '71 4. n J Ft ti X it jct sl 1 p. fz MW m p 1 IZ I( l i , �*, I I � I �'�I ;:� -,bi � u ) i _ _ � � � (3 } �i N �l -i J C Z4 I I s. ! • Re: Plumbing Gentlemen: Lt.] office of the town manager OctobcT 2, 1974 In accordance with the Ordinances of the Tows, of Vail and the Vail Eater & Sanitation District, the folloitiTing items are in need of correction at the earliest - date to facilitate the health and safety of the workers and the citizens of the Town of Vail. Reference is .,lade to the Mechanical later Valve Room. 1. A reduced pressure back flow preventer valve must be installed between domestic i , ,later supply and all fire systems and boilers. 2. All meters and. meter lines must be adequately supported to prevent deflection or rupture of water pipes. 3. Main water supply pipe must be adequately supported. These corrections are required before a certificate of occupancy will be issued, however a possible cross con- nection could result in the contamination of the domestic water for the Town at any time. Sincerely, TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jerry L. Aldrich Chief Building Official JLA /jk cc: Vail Water y Sanitation District • 1 A A box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 Landmark Project Belco Systems, Inc. b cc NAME Landmark Coml i� RlE OCT 1 8 197 ZMINc f ❑ WKS..._.....- TOWN Of V A I L BUILDING � . � b BUILDING PERMIT Z PLUMBING TYPE OF OCCUPANCY AMOUNT EXITS REQ. FLOOR AREA RATIO Q MECHANICAL D Q ELECTRICAL JOB NAME L an d mar k C Qmmerc i a l Un it I OTHER CITY Vail DATE OF APPLICATION October 1, 19 74 TOTAL CJ C `' COVERED UNCOVERED p TOTAL FLOOR AREA cc NAME Landmark Coml DeV. Coll CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA w MAIL ADDRESS Box 686 NEW O ( 1 ADDITION ( 1 REPAIR ( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO O X CITY Vail PH-476-3201 USE OF BUILDING COVERED UNCOVERED p NAME �' yV m SO. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. OFF ST. PARKING H z Q MAIL ADDRESS �> , NO. OF STORIES SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING O ~ CITY I L PH. Ll -) NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT EASEMENTS w NAME CONDO. LODGE SIDE IRI (L) I- = MAIL ADDRESS Q. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE DATE U m TYPE OF HEAT Q CITY PH. WATER ( I FORCED AIR ( I ELEC ( I UNIT ( 1 J LOT 1 BLK w w O TRACT Va F nsHead 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I 11 III II�V� V I HR 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D EVF)G H I J J DIVISION 1 fT 4 3. USE ZONE ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK Install 167 linear - - Mk: 7 — 5/8" 1 hou on each si PLAN NUMBER COVERING EXT. WALLS I NT. W SPECI F ED FIRE SPRINKLERS WET STANDPIPE DRY STANDPIPE COMB. STANDPIPE SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE AREA SEPARATION OCCUPANCY SEPARATION SOIL TEST SURVEY SPECIAL INSPECTOR ROOF NO / v ✓ V / ✓ APPLICATION FEES ACCEPTED BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEES t PLAN CHECK PLUMBING MECHANICAL ROVAL ELECTRICAL ' CLEAN UP DEPOSIT OTHER PERMIT # TOTAL t �� L �7 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE 11 C l READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE d ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE L` LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. !� 7 _� C _Q IGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRA TOR YES X PLUMBING/ MECHANICAL PERMIT TOWN OF VAI L DATE JOB NAME OWNER ADDRESS CONTRACTOR PHONE USE OF BUILDING: CLASS OF WORK: ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ REMODEL ❑ REPAIR DESCRIPTION OF WORK: PLUMBING: NUMBER MECHANICAL: NUMBER VALUATION $ VALUATION $ REMARKS: REMARKS: PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE ❑ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE TOTAL FEES: $ K*K*B July 17, 1974 ''} JUL 19 1974 Mr. Dana C. Rickli 4045 S. Broadway Englewood, Colorado 80110 Re:( Landmark Project � 28 -Day Concrete Test Results west Wall of Main Building Dear Dana: We have reviewed the design of the west concrete wall to determine if there will be structural problems resulting from the reduced concrete strength of 2700 psi. We have determined that the actual shearing stress in this wall is less than the capacity of the wall at 2700 psi. In addition, although we have not received the 45 -day breaks, we would expect the concrete to be very close if not at the 3000 psi value. We, therefore, feel that the strength of the existing wall as indicated by the concrete test results is sufficient to carry the lateral load for which it was intended. If there are any further questions with regard to this matter please let us know. Sincerely, WBO:et William B. O'Neal JJ- 1 0 Rin • 9il JUL 17 i MCFALL AND KONKEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. JAMES H. KONKEL, PRES. 2160 SO. CLERMONT ST JAMES D. MCFALL. EXEC.VP DENVER, COLORADO 80222 WILLIAM R. KIMBALL. VP TEL. 303- 757 -4976 TEMPLE O. LOONEY, JR.. VP July 15, 1974 R. L. ETHRIDGE, BUS. MGR. Mr. Harvey Travis Vail Building Department Box 631 Vail, Colorado RE: Landmark at Vail - 7378 Dear Mr. Travis: Ne are instrucing the Mechanical Contractor to install 4" 0 exhaust ducts from the range hoods as shown on the plans, per our telephone conversation July 15, 1974, at which time you approved this install- ation. If you have any questions, please call. Yours truly, c Bob Myrick cc: Dana Rickli BM:g 1 %W ad <-- fiatdi Enginzvu, _ qne. CIVIL ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYS SUBDIVISIONS - WATER & SEWER 5Y5TEM5 Kenneth E. Richards Mr. Dana Rickli, Architect 4045 S. Broadway Englewood, Colorado Re: Landmark at LionsHead Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Rickli: Box 1908 Vail, Colorado 81657 Phone 476 -5072 Denver 244 -1521 June 26, 1974 RE JUN 2 8 1974 Registered Professional Engines Registered land Surveyors This letter is to certify that all footings and foundations on the Landmark Building at LionsHead were constructed as shown on your Plans S -1, S -2 and S -3. We did not inspect the soils and compaction for the footings since this was done by the Town's building inspector and by your soils engineer. Our work on this project involved inspection of all steel and concrete items. Sincerely, RICHARDS ENGINEERS, INC. Kenneth E. Richards Registered Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 2183 `, = KER /pr 1 cc: Vail Building Inspector `_ -� PLUMBING/ MECHANICAL PERMIT TOWN OF VAI L USE OF BUILDING: CLASS OF WORK: �I NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ REMODEL ❑ REPAIR DESCRIPTION OF WORK: 1v Z _ _ / --n / - -$z- PLUMBING: NUMBER MECHANICAL: NUMBER '�, I7 -A VALUATION $ VALUATION $ Zz REMARKS: REMARKS: ` f x I PERMIT FEE PERMIT FE pb 1� 35 APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE � TOTAL FEES: $ S� J � d C, _ I V R. W. MIER CONSTRUCTION COMPiNY To: City of Vail Date: Building Department Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Submitted No. Landmark at- Lionsread Gentlemen: We are transmitting---L'. .-herewith shop drawings ---under separate cover data other for ___ approval fabrication your use revise and resubmit other as follows: NO. DWG. COPIES NO, BY DESCRIPTION Sub- Cor.t List Remarks Ibis 11s supplied per vczir re4u-sr_. Very trill y yours R. W. Mier Construction Company Ndlen Anderson By .. a SUB -CO ,NRACTORS LIST DATE - PROJECT Tandmark at Lionshead - GENERAL CONTRACTOR R W . -Con-- SUPERINTENDENT Ta r. donor EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR R & B EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR CONCRETE SUPPLIER Porto_1 �- Mour`^:!- _ /y CONCRETE PUMPER Concrete Pumbina Fnc � �` �� ✓s ` "vC�v'�� CONCRETE CONTRACTOR R. W. Mier MASONRY CONTRACTOR t-je >i a- NoA " FRAMING CONTRACTOR R. W. Mier r PLUMBING CONTRACTOR Belco Systems e MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR Belco S stems � MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Howard Electric 17(.E KAFTAI FARRIr.ATnR nufficv Tron Works ROOFING CONTRACTOR Eagle l'allev Roc`iro FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR Houn+ S+ Fire 11 rc' - c c' FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR — PRECAST CONTRACTOR rlcuntain Prenf cti CRANE CONTRACTOR ELEVATOR CONTRACTOR �ic•ntgomery Elevator Not ,' Z DRY WALL'CONTRACTOR Timberline Drywall Tnr- -4 PAVING CONTRACTOR Not awarded LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR ITOt Aw rfleel - _— SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS Clover Glass Noy/-' FOR FOR FOR OTHER FOR FOR FOR TESTING AGENCIES CONCRETE_.. Nt - r ,,, : . T :.. - ;,, v `•., - SOILS V. Tho:,l,ls�n STEEL _ _ R i c' En7 ineer in , it of MASONRY �i `EC I AL INSPECTOR / FiRim Ricart4 F- -1 - - I f 1' i I Frasier & Gingery, Inc. CONSULTINO ENGINEERS 2840 SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET ENGL EWOOD, COLORADO 80110 TELEPHONE 303 761 -4860 '1W May 30, 1973 Mr. Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail P. 0. Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Landmark at Lionshead Plan Check for Compliance with Uniform Building Code Our Job No. 452.06 Dear Mr. Aldrich: The drawings and specifications for Landmark at Lionshead have been reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code. Our preliminary findings and recommendations are pre- sented herein. The required corrections are marked on the plans. We will make our final plan check as soon as we re- ceive the corrected plans. If you have any questions regarding the referenced subject, please contact us at any time. Very truly yours, FRASIER & GINGERY, INC. Knud 0. Rasmussen, P.E. KOR /mm Enclosure CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER & SANITATION C+ J PART A PRELIMINARY JOB NO. 452.06 REVIEW FOR OCCUPANCY, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AND EXIT REQUIREMENTS Items found to be fully or partially in violation of the Code are as follows: 1. Mixed Occupancy - Floor Areas a. Actual Floor Areas F -1 Type II 24,054 S.F. F -2 Type II 13,281 S.F. H Type V -N 25,496 S.F. H Type II 43,399 S.F. b. Allowable Floor Areas F -1 Type II (30,000)(1.33) 40,000 S.F. F -2 Type II (30,000)(1.33)(2) 80,000 S.F. H Type V -N (4,500)(1.33)(2) 12,000 S.F. H Type II (22,500)(1.33)(2) 60,000 S.F. C. Structure as Single Building - Section 503(a) F -1 F -2 H -VN H -II 24,054 + 13,281 + 25,496 + 43,399 < 1.0 Required 40 80,000 12,000 60,000 = 0.601 + 0.166 + 2.125 + 0.723 = 3.615> 1.00 Therefore building must be provided with area separation walls in accordance with Section 505(c). Four -hour sepa- ration required for Type II construction and two -hour separation for Type V construction. d. Ratio for Multiple Building Concept - .Garage considered as separate building H Occupancy, Type V considered as separate group of buildings. Ratio for remainder is: F -2 H -II 0.166 + 0.723 0.889 < 1.00 -1- With addition of required area separation walls the requirements of Section 503(a) can be met. 2. Floor Area - Townhouses a. Four h r separation is required of the precast con- struction over the F -1 Occupancy Garage in conformance with Code. Section 503(b) and Section 505 -C -1. b. As noted under Item 1 above, total area of the town- houses exceeds allowable area by a ratio of 2.125/1.0. Therefore, area separation walls must be provided be- tween certain units to divide the townhouse structure into three separate buildings. C. Concrete masonry walls between apartment units should either be fully grouted or specified with shell thick- nesses as required for two -hour separation. Section 505 -C -1. d. Roof construction should have one -hour fire resistive construction per Section 505 -C -3, Exception 2. e. Balconies and roof projections to be of one -hour fire resistive treated wood unless openings protected by three - quarter hour fire protection. Section 505 -C -2. 3. Story Height - Townhouses a. As detailed, the townhouses are Type V -N construction three stories high. Table 5 -C limits Type V -N construc- tion to three stories. b. Compliance with requirements for Type V, one -hour con- struction is required for three -story construction. C. Allowable area increase for Type V -I construction will permit building to be divided by a single area separa- tion wall in lieu of two as set forth under Item 2 above. 4. Exterior Walls - Openings a. On Sheet A9 the dimension of 19 ft. ± is given between Type V townhouses and the Type II apartments. Since they must be considered as separate buildings to meet area requirements and requirements of Section 504(c) apply whereby a property line shall be assumed to lie midway between the building. -2- (4� '�M) Under Section 1903(b) three - quarter hour protection is required when openings are located less than 20 ft. from the property line. b. Balcony and window openings along the East property line are also less than 20 ft. separation and require three - quarter hour protection under Section 1903(b). S. Drawing AS - Garage Separation a. As noted under Item 1 above, the garage must be con- sidered to be a separate building for allowable floor area. b. Wall should have four -hour fire resistance from D9 to D12, D12 to C12, C12 to C13, C13 to D13, and D13 to D15. All openings must have three -hour rating. Section 505 -C -1. C. Structure over garage area should have four -hour fire protection per Section 503(b). 6. Stair "C" a. The plan views of Stair "C" do not correspond on Draw- ings AS and A9. Details on A13 correspond to A8. b. On Drawing AS the smokeproof enclosure of Stair "C" has been left open. Provide door in compliance with Section 3309 -h. C. On Drawings AS and A13 the elevator equipment room is shown located under Stair "C ". Exit enclosures shall have no enclosed usable space under the stair nor shall the open space be used for any purpose as provided under Section 3308 -f. 7. Openings No door or window schedules have been included in the drawings. Compliance with the Code cannot be checked. 8. Fireplaces Details of fireplaces are incomplete. Compliance with Sec- tion 3704 cannot be checked. -3- 9. Railings a. Railing heights at terraces at the loft level are not given. Minimum height is 38 inches under Ordi- nance No. 14, Town of Vail. b. No detail is shown for the railings on the north side of the apartment building. Compliance with Ordinance No. 14, Town of Vail, and Section 1714 of the Code cannot be checked. 10. Townhouse - Lofts a. Under Ordinance No. 14, Town of Vail, all lofts con- structed over kitchen areas shall have a minimum one - hour fire separation. b. Stairs from the 1st floor to the 3rd floor are stacked within a single enclosure providing only one means of exit from the 3rd floor. 11. Garage Ventilation Exhaust ventilation for the garage is shown on Drawing A8 as being taken from the ceiling. Section 1105 provides that exhaust ventilation shall be taken from a point at or near the floor level. -4- v PART B PRELIMINARY JOB NO. 452.06 S4� REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ENGINEERING REGULATIONS Items found to be fully or in violation of the Code are as follows: 1. No layout of equipment to be housed in mechanical rooms has been provided. Hence compliance with Code require- ments cannot be checked. Z. Under the Special Construction Requirements of the Town of Vail, special inspection is required for the following types of work: a. Concrete b. Masonry C. Welding The Special Inspector shall be employed by a registered professional engineering firm, and shall be approved by the Building Official. RICHARDS ENGINEERsr INC. P. 0. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476 -5072 Denver 244 -1521 TO Mr. Jerry Aldrich Town of Vail Building Department P ict nffir• Rox lnn Vail, Colorado 81657 R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simms Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 GENTLEMEN: L OF TRUSADUMQ[L DATE JOB NO. October 19 1973 V3 -83 ATTENTION RE: — WE ARE SENDING YOU kk Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ---Inspeetion Reports October 4 - 117, 1973 'N' Tandmnrk THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted XX For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints COPY TO ° SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF V8|L � .. / {nspeoto -_._- CO ' | ' i rJ n�T� i L�C�T!ON .APP�OVE^, CORRECTIONS REQUIRED. . . ' ProJecf Nome � STEELt ADDITIONAL REMARKS ____ / {nspeoto -_._- CO ' | ' i rJ n�T� i L�C�T!ON .APP�OVE^, CORRECTIONS REQUIRED. . . ' ProJecf Nome � STEELt ADDITIONAL REMARKS ____ 0 1 • 9 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VA I L Project Nam Inspector CIO NO R c- ► E DATE LOCAT I ON !APPROVED CORRECTIONS REQUIRE S. THER: SPecifY- ADDITIONAL REMARKS STEELt- • 4v SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Name 4 -- A ?ek Inspector F C i CONCRETE: P-' - GATE LOCATION APPROVEC .., /, L_ w N � C - 7 C ff � 70' ZL 6 - "5 CORRECTIONS REQUI R : SDec I f Y: ADDITIONAL REMARKS STEEL i_ T6 t t APPLICATION iOR VARIANCE And /Or COHDI T'10HAL USL PLRMIT Ordinance No. d (Series of 1973) Application Date Publication Date Hearing Date Hearing Fee Final Decision date for Town Council I (we) Landmark Condominium Association of (Applicant) Colorado (State 0 Vail Box 3639 (Address) P h o ri e 303/476 -1350 (City) do hereby request permission to appear before the Vail Planning Commission to request the following: (X ) Variance from Article 9 Section 9.602 ( ) Zoning Change from to ( ) Parking Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit to allow in Zone. For the following described property: Lot /tract_ Block 1 F i l i n g N umber Vail /LionsHead 3rd Filing Clearly state purpose and intent of this app I ication request for setback variance to construct covered walkway on north side of existing townhouses to eliminate dangerous snow and ice buildup caused by improper installation of the slope of the concrete. What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this case? Because there is no other potential use for the property and - since we are not changing the use of the property but are interested only in improving the saf ety of the walkway, the association feels that it has a basis for hardship. y i y g � nafiure of App I i c;an ^ t� ' �� .t 8 i It Public Notice PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Mr. W. Robert Smith, representing Landmark Condominium Association, is requesting a variance from Article 9, Section 9.602 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973 in order to construct a covering over the northern walkway of the Landmark Townhouses. Application had been made in accord with Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance. A Public Hearing will be held on July 22, 1976 before the Vail Planning Commission, whose decision will be transmitted to the Town Council for final action. The Public Hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal Building at 3:00 P.M. TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT K amer blished in the Vail Trail, July 2, 1976 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) I (�� do solemnly swear that I am the t�U{31..t5 of THE VAIL TRAIL; that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has- been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as second -class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of consecutive insertions; and that the first pubication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated — A.D. 19a(0_ and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated l A.D. 19 26 In witness whereof I have hereunto set - my hand this day of A.D. 19 1 ty of Eagle, .D. 19-2- Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in State of Colorado, this ` day of My Commission eWiU i11Eission m A ugk_ , t . 19 rdrar Public r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Mr. Peter Brant hjs applied for a setback variance frorn the provisions of Section 3.562 of the Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. R, Series of 1973, in order to construct an outdoor deck within 7' of the south property line of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village Third Filing. Application has been made in accordance with Section 19.20) of the Zoning Ordinance. A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 21.500 of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973 on Octcber 21, 1976 at 3;00 p.m. before the Vail Planning Commission whose decision will be transmitted to the Town Council for final decision. Said hearing will beheld in the Vail Municipal Building. TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Diana S. Toughill Zoning Administrator Published in The Vail Trail on October 1, 1976. /rrw r J 4 l� 10 yofvoii March 20, 1973 N box 1 o . vaiI, colorado 81 657 • 303 4 76.561 3 TO: TOWN COUNCIL TERRY MINGER PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KENT ROSE JIM LAMONT DIANA TOUGHILL RE: STAFF REVIEW OF LANDMARK AT VAIL After careful review of the subject project, the Town staff would like to make the following recommendations: s 1. Cooperation should be sought between the developer and Vail Associates to provide a buffer between the Landmark project and the Vail Associates Parking lot. We suggest the use of berms and heavy landscaping. 2. The 13 parking spaces on the south side of project should be eliminated and landscaping substituted as these spaces are not required and this would be an effective visual break in a large expanse of asphalt. 3. Grades on garage ramps appear to be very steep and we would .suggest that ramps be heated to avoid a traffic hazard into and out of site. .4. More wood could be used on the taller section of the structure to make it more compatible with the townhouse section. 5. The severe facade of the commercial spaces could be softened. 6. A complete landscaping plan should be submitted for approval 7. All signs must be approved by the Sign Review Committee. Ae /^� V dt i t, t" RICHARDS ENGINEER*C. P. 0. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476.5072 Denver 2441521 TO M r. Jerry Aldrich Town of Vail Building Department Post Office Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simons Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 LIEUU * OF MUSAUTTad DATE JOB NO, December 7 1973 V3 -83 ATTENTION RE: GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU [RxAttached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 For your use ❑ Inspection Reports October 18 - December 3, 1973 CLandmark ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ft For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints COPY TO SIGNED: Kenneth E. Richards Project Name ='t -�� y'LC CONCRETE: / f : t l4 DATE ! LOCATION ' 5"`�.�_L• ryL � sue. - f ±- '_'� C �' �L (� /G_ ( y f y�fiv't STEEL: 71 x mss' R Inspector ^ � P A . "..1, SDecIfy: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 0 o. SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL i 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL i Project Name nspector --=' CO 1 /Ai 5 DATE ! LOCATION IAPPROVE1 i 1,4 1 1 7 - -=== -- .� CORRECTIONS REQUIRED MASONKT• c y ' ' cam' �� r rsT' /L OTHER: Speci ADDITIONAL REMARKS • SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Nam -4, -z —e( —1 I /Z, !'< ,��/' �/� _ ( o rs S �, I n s p e c to r PRECAST: HER: SPecIfYo ADDITIONAL REMARKS CONCRETE: L DATE LOCATION ( APPR OVED CORRECTIONS RE2UIRED > AQ xs MASONRY: F - PRECAST: HER: SPecIfYo ADDITIONAL REMARKS • 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project N a m e Inspector CONCRETE: DAFT E i LOCA - T * ION I APPROVE CORRECTIO UIRED MAbUNKT: ' T ^ e - 1 1 1,3 e--L STEEL: Lxv - a OTHER: Spec—l—fy—*. ADDITIONAL REMARKS C7 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project N r.()Nrp L] DATE LOCATION, 1APEBOVED 4;% F, 1044h Lie & 12, f A CORRECTIONS REQUIRED 0 44 e f% Ir r r I - mmr A C OTHER: S p q c_!—ty-: -- T ADDITIONAL REMARKS TOWN OF VA I L FILE DEC 2 71973 K K B N A C�l November 9, 1973 Building Department City of Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 Attn: Jerry Aldrich, Chief Building Official Re: Landmark 'at Lions Head Condominium Gentlemen: NOV 131973 As you note in your report of October 12, 1973, the 45 -day break for an area of the north wall centrally located as reported by Materials Testing Services, did not come up to the full design requirement of 3000 psi. We have reviewed this and feel that the actual strength is not low enough to cause any concern. As you are probably aware, the wall in question has vertical reinforcing, specifically #4's at 18, which is primarily temperature control reinforcing. It will, however, in addi- tion give us additional compression capacity therefore, compensating for the loss in the concrete compressive stress. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to call. fS'i�ncerely, J William B. O'Neal, P.E. WBO:db cc: Dana Rickli November 5, 1973 Mr. John G. Pierpoint McFall and Konkel 2160 South Clermont Street Denver, Colorado 80222 RE: Seg Conn - La A Vail Dear Mr. Pierpoint, The proposed sewer connection on the East side of the Landmark building cannot be routed as shown on the plans. The route shown would place your sewer line through an area containing two 12 -inch tees and three gate valves controlling the water rains in this area. Your second proposal is equally unacceptable. This route would place your sewer lines in the utility easement for a distance: of 75 to 80 feet. Due to the already crowded condition of this casement we cannot permit this type of connection. Routing the sewer line: 17 feet to the north of the location shown on the Flans would be accertalle. This will require a manhole to be constructed over the tap site (as did your originally proposed location). Specifications for the man- hole can be obtained from the Vail Water and Sanitation; District. If you need additional information please call me at 476 -2310 Yours truly, TOWN OF VAIL Harvey A. Travis Plumbing Inspector ri '*W DANA CHRISTOPHER RICKLI ARCHITECT 4045 S. BROADWAY - SUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD - C0L01F;?ADO.789 -4525 October 30, 1973 Jerry Aldrich Chief Building, Official Vail, Colorado RF: Landmark Condominium Dear Jerry: Just a note to confirm the alternatives available for meeting__ roofing requirements on the above project. We understand that 1/2" firecode drywall under the plywood roof sheathing allows us to install non -fire retardant wood shingles. Further, we are using non -fire treated 1. plywood for siding over a stud wall which has S /F" gypsum sheathing on exterior and 5/8" drywall on the interior providing a one hour exterior wall. Yours truly, DANA HRISTOPHER RICKLI ARCHITECT D na C. Rickli cc: R.W. Mier DCR:dk RICHARDS ENGINEER, .NC. P. 0. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476 -5072 Denver 244 -1521 TO Mr. Jerry Aldrich Town of ai Building Department P ost Office Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simms Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 LEMMA OlF UN MM'TUL DATE I JOB NO, October 8, 1973 V3 -83 ATTENTION RE au OCT 19197- GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU x?q Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I nspection Reports September 20, — October 2, 1973 T.nndTnnrk THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below i=., For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 3 & For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections For review and comment ❑ G FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS Cl PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: Kenneth F._ Richards It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. form 240 0— New EngI nd 8­ness S—­, Inc., Tow d. Mess Resubmit copies for approval Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints the following items: ❑ Specifications }—'------' --'----- -------------------------------------' SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VA\L , Project Nam Inspecto i ,J DATE i LOC8T|OM .APP��VEu/ CORRECTIONS REOUIRE — " —'--- � | OTHER: Soecyfy: ' Ai — " —'--- � | OTHER: Soecyfy: ' SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Inspector Project Name CONCRETE: -/� i DATE 1 LOCATION APPROVED � �..�1..^L� �' �' � fir_ r !' ',• � � //? 1 xh, r CORRECTIONS REQUIRED -X STEEP S 7 �IL3 OTHER: SPec I fY: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 1 0 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VA I L P r o j e c t N a m a rnMrPPTP- Inspector---,-- DATE LOCATION i APPROVED CORRECTIONS REQUIRED /7 Z 7 THER: Soeclfl-i'o ADDITIONAL REMARKS RICHARDS ENGINEERONC. • P. 0. Box W& 1908 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 LETTM. OF TRANSIYIITTAL Vail 476.5072 Denver 244.1521 TO Mr. Jerry Aldrich Town of Vail Building Department P ost Office Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simms Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 DATE JOB NO. September 25, 197 V3 -83 ATTENTION RE: FILE SEP 2 61973 utNTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU x® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted XxFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPY COPIES 1 DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Inspection Reports September 7 - September 17, 197r Landmark THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted XxFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPY I N SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL 4 A , DA Project Name /�_ CONCRETE: LOCATION_ 12 'Ile f-- Z> STEEL 13 F • Inspector APPROVED CORRECTIONS-REQUIRED 71 — lee f C, C -sit k- A" eez OTHER: SP-@ �lf 2- ADDITIONAL PC'MARKS DATE 1121 , L-4 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN. OF VAIL Project Name /---, CONCRETE: I I 0 Inspector LOCATION APPROVED - STEE PRECAST: RRECTIONS REQUIRED 7�7777 77 /T 7 7 T 7-i T 7777 THER: Specify. ADDITIONAL REMARKS STEE PRECAST: RRECTIONS REQUIRED 7�7777 77 /T 7 7 T 7-i T 7777 THER: Specify. ADDITIONAL REMARKS 0 . 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Name Inspector RECTIONS REQUI STEEL- . 0 OTHER:- Specify: ADDITIONAL REMARKS CONCRETE: DATE LOCATION APPRO VED 2 E zz RECTIONS REQUI STEEL- . 0 OTHER:- Specify: ADDITIONAL REMARKS C7 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL RLE OCT a 41913 Project Name _/,A., -w*AA4 /C✓ Inspector .s/a&t If - Wi fleot CONCRETE_ DATE LOCATION APPROVED CORRECTIONS REQUIRED Las✓ S `ci � .�isS�.G r 7 .4 4Kt /z 4 /S O THER: --- SD ecIfv: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 0 6 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project , 'Name r ° CONCRETE: Inspector / DATE LOCATION JAPPROVIED CORRECTIONS REQUIRED / � 73 /l 73 Knit /l y �KCk s /w.�P * 4 A 4d A4 NSp Gc�� wo40 "s A fs/Lf- t t /�w•�fi r4 s *.,4speer6•- OTHER: SP e c I f Y_:_, ADD I T I O N A L R E M A_R K S_ - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- _ - - - - -- - at SEP 1 1973 /` iew- RICHARDS ENGINEERaC. P. 0. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476.5072 Denver 244 -1521 TO Mr. Jerry Aldrich Town of Vail Building Department Post Office Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simms Street GENTLEMtfIk.ewood, Colorado 80215 WE ARE SENDING YOU 72: Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 As requested ❑ Inspection Reports August 24, September 6, 197 LandMark ❑ FOR BIDS DUE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval xk] For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US I ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections [LIE @F - musno - TwQ, DATE Se ptember 10 1273 I JOB NO. 3--83 ATTEN ION RE: I 197' i ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints COPY tl 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VA I L Project Name I n s p e c t o r CONCRETE: CORRr-CTIONS REQUIRED DATE LOCATION APPROVED 7 ,,9 -5N e7 S4 A A a STEEL- 5- 0 C7 �F12 3 K 2 ADDITIONAL REMARKS OTHER Sp ecif SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Name Inspector = CONCRETE: t DATE ! LOCATION IAPPROV£D CORRECTIONS REOUIREO s STEEL: _ PV,)J S'' '`v�r.L�� dr cr�t.� i S1�f / - 9 4 - r - u PRECAST; • -- - -" -- -- T r SoecI fy: ADDITIONAL REMARKS 464'k 6 �� \r S/ q 4 `i R. W. MI ER 1100 SIMMS STREET LAKEWOOD, COLORADO PHONE: 232 -6455 Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Re:. Landmark It Lionshead August 31, 1.973 Gentlemen: P. O. DRAWER 10776 - EDGEMONT STATION GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 All SEP 4 IM , In reference to gout letter. of 28 August 1973 indicating that a concrete test taken 7 August 1973 showed low results at 14 days, we would like to inform you that tune IT cement was being used which can take a longer neriod of time to come to strength required. Very truly yours, R. W. 1 4TER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY REO /dm Off" PLUMBING/ MECHANICAL PERMIT TOWN OF VAI L DATE JOB NAME OWNER ADDRESS CONTRACTOR PHONE USE OF BUILDING: CLASS OF WORK: ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ REMODEL ❑ REPAIR DESCRIPTION OF WORK: PLUMBING: NUMBER MECHANICAL: NUMBER VALUATION $ VALUATION $ REMARKS: REMARKS: PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE ❑ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED DATE TOTAL FEES: $ � � yz z SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT HLL SEP 17 1973 TOWN OF VAIL Project Nam nnMnPFTF- Inspector DATE LOCATION APPR OVED CORRECTIONS REQUIRED 14,1 f AL ,V/ OTHER: S 1) fkq I j-Y ADD I T I OVAL R,EMA.R-KS- RICHARDS ENGINEER&C. P. O. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476.5072 Denver 2441521 TO Mr. Jerry Aldrich Town of Vail Building Department p net Offioe Rnx inn Vail, Colorado 81657 LETTE.� OF TRANSIYIITTAL DAT 5ugust 24, 1973 I J O8 N b - 83 ATTENTION RE: R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simms Street GENTLE1vIVOcId, Colorado 80215 WE ARE SENDING YOU :Uc Attached ❑ Under separate cover via • Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans • Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 ❑ Approved as noted Inspection Reports August 16 , 22, 1 LandMark As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted XX For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY FMM!@D —Nw boam!Brine SM N. IN.. iMm CUM ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints SIGNED: Kenneth E. Richards If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VA I L Project Name/., , - �7' t'N--- / zi k Inspector TEEL-- RECTIONS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL REMARKS OTHER: SpeclfV: CONCRETE: ------------ DATE i LOCATION APPROVE 7-7 e7l 0 ff TEEL-- RECTIONS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL REMARKS OTHER: SpeclfV: SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Name X 7 _F nr- CONCRETE: DATE LOCATION ',APPROVE[) /_ y � 5�4` t� y' ` s e ­2 71 p I n s p e c to r =L cl ORRECTIONS REQUIRE PRECAST: OTHER: Snecify: ADDITIONAL REMARKS STEEL- � PRECAST: OTHER: Snecify: ADDITIONAL REMARKS SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VA|L pro'eof N0 Ka SEP |nspaofor DATE LOCATION APPROVED CORRECTIONS REQUIRED f/. y L7 I F*vAns f 8DD|T1ON8LRE A Frasier & Gingery, mc. 2840 SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET ENGL EWOOD, COLORADO 80110 f' TELEPHONE 303 761 -4860 August 17,1973 Mr. Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail P. O. Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 Statement Job No. 452.06- Plan Check- The Landmark Fixed Fee .............. $±; - Total Amount Due This Statement...... Accounts not paid within 30 days from date of statement will be charged INTEREST at the rate of 1% per month of the unpaid balance. d• li Frasier & Gingery, /nc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2840 SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET ENGL EWOOD, COLORADO 80110 TELEPHONE 303 761 -4860 August 17, 1973 Mr. Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail P. 0. Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 pil AUG 2 01973 Re� 'ndmark t Lionshead - Plan Check for Compliance — ni orm Building Code - Our Job No. 452.06 Dear Mr. Aldrich: In response to our Preliminary Review dated May 30, 1973, the Architect by letter of June 14, 1973 submitted an ex- tensive list of proposed revisions to bring the project into compliance with the Code. On July 5, 1973, we issued our review of these proposed revisions noting the items which in our opinion had not been brought up to Code requirements. On August 8, and August 15, 1973, the Architect submitted new letters enumerating the methods by which Code compliance would be obtained. Revised drawings were received on August 15, 1973. With reference to the Architect's letter of August 8, 1973 and the revised drawings dated August 3, 1973, our review is as follows: Item ld Fire separation wall as required has been provided. However, on the drawings, it is shown only at the third flood level on Sheet A3 between Units TH22 and TH23, upper level. For clarity and onsite consistency, it should also be shown on the second floor level between TH22 and TH23, and on the first floor level between TH8 and TH9. CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER & SANITATION Mr. Jerry Aldrich August 17, 1973 Page Two Two -hour ceiling is called for in the letter, and on the plans over Unit TH22. Similar ceiling is required over TH23. By letter of August 15, 1973, the Architect provides the two -hour ceiling over TH23. The change should be added to the plans. Item 2a Approved. Items 2b and 2c Approved. Items 3a, 3b, 3c Approved. Tram An Deletion of windows at the east end of the townhouses noted. However, windows at the northwest corner bedrooms of tower apartments are still in violation. Subject to acceptance by the Building Official. (Sheets A9, 10, 11, 12 and 13). Item 4 Approved. Item 5a Approved. Item 5b Approved; however, three -hour label for the door is not shown on the drawings. Item 5c Approved. • C Mr. Jerry Aldrich August 17, 1973 Page Three Item 6b Approved. Item 6c Approved. Item 10b LJ Procedure appears satisfactory. Subject to approval by Building Official. Proposed ladders and required rail openings have not been shown on the revised drawings. Item 11 Approved. This completes our review of the Landmark Project. All data is being returned to you under separate cover. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. KOR /mam Very truly yours, FRASIE R $ GINGERY, INC. Knud 0. Rasmussen, P. E. cc: Mr. Dana C. Rickli � 1 a RICHARDS ENGINEER&C. P. 0. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476.5072 Denver 2441521 TO Mr. Jerry Aldrich Town of Vail Building Department Post Office Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 R. W. Mier Construction 1100 Simons Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215 GENTLEMEN: LLIEVU OF TRP SEDUMI DATE August 17, 1973 JOB NO. V3 -83 ATTENTION RE: 1 RLE AUG 9') I^ Inspection Reports August 3 - August 15, 197 Landmark WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Inspection Reports August 3 - August 15, 197 Landmark THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 6&For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY F — 2@B —Bw W.W Baia— S-m, I., T.—W. M—. ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections SIGNED: Kenneth E. Richards If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Name Inspector CORRECTIONS RE !APPROVEl -,1 �4/l STE E L: 1' -2 HER: Spec I f y__; ADDITIONAL REMARKS CONCRETE: = D LOCATION 3z, A/0 I l� Inspector CORRECTIONS RE !APPROVEl -,1 �4/l STE E L: 1' -2 HER: Spec I f y__; ADDITIONAL REMARKS SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL t Project Name STEEL: r� • / X71 Af� !` _t� ✓r 5 Inspector PRECAST: - - - ------- - ---------- OTHER: S ecit : I — t - ADDITI0NAL REMARKS DANA CHRI6TOPHER RZCKLI ARCHITECT 4045 S. BROADWAY CiUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 789.4525 August 15, 1973 Fr18ier and Gingery Inc. 2RAt1 Sont'.i Vallejo Englewood, Colorado 0. 0110 nr r.. L.�t:dr.�x;� Plan Reviecr Gore t l RE AUG 201973 Towniuouse ceilings at third floor, :.nits 4nd cj shall ?lave tvo layers typo 'T' drrtali. Y :pure truly, MHA CHRIST01 RTCI'Ll ARCHIT".CT Dana C. Rickli CC/ J. Aldrich R. 0 • Cannt -r • v SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF V A I L RLE SEP 1 7 1973 Project Name /Vl/ Lvzr �TI� !- ~a k✓K Inspector rnNr.RFTF DATE LOCATION 'APPROVED CORRECT ION'UIR D i I S�Gr S /kHyos bC- �wee�c 1 ' II SIKb., Q,t 7 -/- el /K c6t -44 t /G 73 �/tl �I _ ✓ G�1ous h- &L e. rc /lG7kd s rt#%&JLJ« At h- E t MASONRY: PRECAST: F - V ADD I T I ONAL REMARKS ✓ p 1 S GAS .o-t4 TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT JOB NAME I-f4l,��� DATE OF APPLICATION �? ?? 19 r :�_' 4 75 TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REQ, cc NAME�I� PLUMBING w MAIL ADDRESS C O CITY AW PH. S FLOOR AREA RATIO R INT. WALLS 1 L�J LS p NAME W• M l i SQ. FT. OF BLDG. H < MAIL ADDRESS L� OTHER Oz U ~ CITY w NAME �� R► KL t FRONT U H EASEMENTS � MAIL ADDRESS 'FG - 5 ' ' S r� �✓ Q CITY :7�C.FA� PH.��I- :�_' 4 75 TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REQ, BUILDING Z PLUMBING 0 TOTAL LOT AREA C MECHA NEW ALTERATION ( 1 ADDITION( ) REPAIR( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO USE OF BUILDING INT. WALLS 1 L�J LS Q ELECTRICAL SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. c OTHER NO. OF STORIES 715 TOTAL :�_' 4 75 TYPE OF OCCUPANCY I AMOUNT I EXITS REQ, FEES E DING PERMIT CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT DATE J ,A APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLAN CHEC APPROVAL t e n / Q q N N T TO X-1 I H DGE THAT I n READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE C1 / ��/{ ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY 1 WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. A c I" a % SI NA RE OF OWNER OR CO RACTOR COVERED UNCOVERED 1 1� J Cal TOTAL FLOOR AREA CLASS OF WORK TOTAL LOT AREA TRACT ; ^ f EXT. WALLS ik NEW ALTERATION ( 1 ADDITION( ) REPAIR( 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO USE OF BUILDING INT. WALLS 1 L�J LS 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIONogg III IV V I HR SQ. FT. OF BLDG. HEIGHT IN FT. c OFF ST. PARKING NO. OF STORIES 715 SETBACKS OFF ST. LOADING NO. OF LIVING UNITS FRONT ^ 'a' C7 EASEMENTS CONDO. �✓ LODGE DIVISION 1 3 4 SIDE ( -R) (L) I SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL REAR VARIANCE TYPE OF HEAT WATER ( ) FORCED A IR ( 1 ELEC' UNIT( 1 FEES E DING PERMIT CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT DATE J ,A APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLAN CHEC APPROVAL t e n / Q q N N T TO X-1 I H DGE THAT I n READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE C1 / ��/{ ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY 1 WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. A c I" a % SI NA RE OF OWNER OR CO RACTOR COVERED UNCOVERED 1 1� J Cal LOT BLK FILING COVERING w w J D TRACT ; ^ f EXT. WALLS ik ROOF INT. WALLS 1 L�J LS 1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIONogg III IV V I HR 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E) G H I J S P E C I F I E D YES NO FIRE SPRINKLERS DIVISION 1 3 4 WET STANDPIPE I 3. USE ZONE DRY STANDPIPE COMB. STANDPIPE \'\ SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE X GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION , �- :5 8 I OCCUPANCY SEPARATION x 1 I ,S SOIL TEST X s .�� SURVEY SPECIAL INSPECTOR PLAN NUMBER FEES E DING PERMIT CHECK FEES PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL CLEAN UP DEPOSIT DATE J ,A APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLAN CHEC APPROVAL t e n / Q q N N T TO X-1 I H DGE THAT I n READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE C1 / ��/{ ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY 1 WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGARDING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. A c I" a % SI NA RE OF OWNER OR CO RACTOR COVERED UNCOVERED 1 1� VA I L Vol t; R s S-3A N I T A T 10 N DI's CT P.O. 9OX 565 VAIL, COLOR;z-\DO 3i657 303 476-; TO: We Have Debiied Your Account As Follows: or har• o Terri ',' 10 Days DATE: . 7 , 1,NVOICF No 7 4 e (Please Refer To This Number in all Correspondence) 1 I Service Station Swimming Pool Bas lst ; 2nd 1 3rd ! Convention Center 4th _ Per Person TOTAL POINTS x30.00 = x 5.00 = r.--,44 x 0.10 = gO8, 50 10.00 Points = 1.00 Unit Total Units c30,85' x $300.00 .. Date Inspector ' � , ' .� a , :. �r,• 1'a ) Following the completion of construction of all residential and commercial structures, the District shall perform a physical in- spection of all premises to determine the number of points to be assessed according to the [dater and Sewer Tap Fee and Rate Schedule, as amended, and the District shall make any adjustments necessary in the original tap fee paid. This inspection shall also determine the building owner's water and sewer service charge. Board of Directors Vail Water and Sanitation District �7 J x 2.00 ,5x 1.00 = �� x 0.33 = /4 x 1.00 = µ, L o f 11. Bas lst 2nd _ 3rd Laundry Co=ercial 4th Per Washer 12. ,2 I Outside Mater ( ?Minimum of one) Outside Sprinklers 13. Bas 1st 2nd 3rd 4th _ Fire Hose Cabinets 1 I Service Station Swimming Pool Bas lst ; 2nd 1 3rd ! Convention Center 4th _ Per Person TOTAL POINTS x30.00 = x 5.00 = r.--,44 x 0.10 = gO8, 50 10.00 Points = 1.00 Unit Total Units c30,85' x $300.00 .. Date Inspector ' � , ' .� a , :. �r,• 1'a ) Following the completion of construction of all residential and commercial structures, the District shall perform a physical in- spection of all premises to determine the number of points to be assessed according to the [dater and Sewer Tap Fee and Rate Schedule, as amended, and the District shall make any adjustments necessary in the original tap fee paid. This inspection shall also determine the building owner's water and sewer service charge. Board of Directors Vail Water and Sanitation District �7 J x 2.00 ,5x 1.00 = �� x 0.33 = /4 x 1.00 = µ, L o f mss-►' ra��n f�1,�Ns VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT P. 0. BOX 631 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Name of Business or Home Owner Address Al AT Lot B lock ring 1. If. 4. le C. 7. :.a• ✓s - 5 T - ! U1zr 'j AL— Toilet, Uriial, or Washbowl Residential x 0.75 = Commercial r3 x 1.00 Shower or Tub x 1.50 Bas 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Bas lst 2nd 3rd 4th ,3. Bas 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Ice Machines Water Coolers and water fountains Bas 1st /4 1 1 4 2nd ;, Z 3rd r r 4th Saunas Bas. 1st 2nd 1 3rd Basin and Toilet 4th I j One -Half Bath Bas I 1st ro 2nd t /0 ro Full Bath 3rd to (Shower or Tub, 4th i - Basin, Toilet) Bas + 3 orj lot 2nd ` u ►� rS I I� Rooms (Living rooms 3rd. 4th Bedrooms, Offices, x 0.25 = x 0.25 = 5'8 x 0.2 5 = 1 50 x 1. BO = ► I (o x 3.00 = 3 uo 1� i r 5 Shops, Studios), 8. Bas lst 14 ►!r 1-V,, 77 2nd ��t.T _ �.. 3rd 4th 1.: - -- Kitchens Residential S8 x 2.50 = Dishwasher Sri x 1.00 = "• S' Bas. 1st 2nd Kitchens Commercial x 2.50 = 3rd Dishwasher x 1.00 = 4th Seating ; 4 x 2.50 = ,1�9. Bas 1st 2nd 3rd Laundry Residential 4th Per Washer x 0.50 = v.r DANA CHRIgTOPHER RICKLI ARCHITECT 4045 S. BROADWAY SUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 789 -4525 August 8, 1973 AUG 101973 Mr. Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail P.O. Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Landmark (452.06) Frasier and Gingery letter July 5, 1973 Gentlemen: Response to above letter are as follows: 1D - Fire separation wall included between units 8 and 9 with a double layer of 5/8" type X drywall at 3rd floor ceiling unit townhouse 22 (over unit # 8. Building to type 5 - one hour throughout. 2A - Prestressed tendons in garage struc- ture to recieve 1/4" material as well as the deck underside, to provide horizontal fire separation. 2B and 2C - Section 1D 3A 3B,3C - Section It August 8, 1973 Page 2 4A - Windows deleted at east end of townhouses 4B - These windows adjoin a continuous 25' city utility easement. 5A - Separation provided horizontally 5B - Replaced glass with 6" precast and installed labeled door. 5C - Sprayed surface increased rating 6B - Omitted stain to garage level 6C - Smoke detector to be installed in space with bell in first floor office 10B - Ladder added at loft south wall and on face of kitchen with wall. Rungs 12" center to center, 4" away from wall and 18" wide. 11 - Two ducts to floor of garage see plan_ and section A 20 Yours truly, DA CHRISTOPHER CRLI r ARCHITECT Dana C. Rickli cc/ R.W. Mier Co. J.L. Levin DCR:dk Ir TO RICHARDS ENGINEER;, P. 0. Box 643 VAIL, COLORADO 81657 Vail 476 -5072 Denver 244.1521 1100 Simms Street �alFe;reed, Colorado 80215 Town of Vail Building Department Post Office Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 GENTLEMEN: IL IE T 7 @)FURUMMUM DATE JOB NO. August 2, 1973 V3 -83 ATTENTION RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU jc Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 - August 1 1 I' Landmark THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted Ek3Eor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 -:117,1/1:M, ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints SIGNED: Kenneth F Ri chardA If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. io�m 24U— Km r,*me enurra sa.KO. In<.. 7ownsme. was. SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT TOWN OF VAIL Project Name I CONCRETE: DATE LOCATION APPROVED STEE /Al - 7 C C_ A� zt` & -��� �► f t ti _ o ` -: rte= = 3 , y C . STEE /Al - 7 Inspector- - - ----- CORRECTIONS REQUIRED RLE AUG 71973 HER: Specify. ADDITIONAL REMARKS 1.11 WESTERN, ESTJN 13 LR:3UHi9TURJ ES No 96 SOUTH ZUNI STREET • DENVER, COLORADO 80223 • TELEPHONE (303) 744 -2415 Porto Mix Concrete, Inc. Rt. 1, Box 164 Glenwood Springs, Colo. 81601 fM SEP 51913 Ident. No: B 2155 Job: Landmark Job Location: Location of Pour: Batch Out Time: Supplier: Mix No: PHYSICAL PROPERTIES: Unit Weight pcf Temperature of COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS: Cylinder No. Diam. (in.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 CONCRETE TEST RESULTS Time of Test: 2:30 pm Ticket No: Truck No: Sampled by: Ship -In Rec'd 8 -8 -73 (5) Air Content Age (days) 14 14 28 28 28 Specified Strength p si CC: /'j Date of Report: 8-14 -73 8 -28 -73 Cast Date: 7 -31 -73 Strength (psi) 3165 3150 3855 3945 3995 days % Slump 3' in. Remarks WESTERN TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. Donald W. Fleming, P, TO __ Mr. Harry Travis, Plumbing Inspector Box 100 Vail, Colorado SUBJECT La ndma r k a Lionshead, Vail, Colo. — NO. 9 a 10 FOLD �({{ Y h L .o � A t- L Dear Mr. Travis: PEARS )#L COMPANY Manufacturers' Representative 1030 WEST ELLS WOR _AV ENUE DENVER. COLORADO 80223 222 -0821 AREA 303 I DAT 7/24/73 19 Enclosed is a fa ctory shop drawing of_th Innerpak pre - fabricated plumbing wall system which we ar furnishing on the subject We would appreciate your review of this drawing to insure that we are in complian with local plumbing codes. Thank you f or your help in this matter. _Very QQtrul yours Ji1I /ho nVa�,o e NO. 9 FOLD NO 1, FC—D (, _ SIGNED Mike Scofield REPLY DAT 31 July 1973 19_ De ar M r. Scofield, I h ave reviewed the plans you submitted and I see no Drobl with this plumbing wall system if installed as per plans. — NO. 9 & 1U FOL Gla Lln. 'SN AP-A-WAY' FORM 44.912 9-PARTS WILSON JONES COMPANY • L' 1961 ° PRI NTEG IN U.S.A. SIGNED_ - ' e y.= RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY. 371 COLORADO PRESTRESSERS ASSOCIATION 1510 GLEN AYR DR. SUITE 2 LAKEWOOD.COLO 8021; PHONE 278 -5674 July 2G, 1973 Jerry Aldrich Bldg. Official Town of Vail Box 100 Vail, Colo. Knud 0. Rasmussen, P.E. Frasier and Gingery, Inc. 2840 S. Vallejo St. Englewood, Colo. 80110 Gentlemen: The following letter is regarding the Landmark project in Vail and deals specifically with the fire rating of the vertical separation between parking and residential. The project has been designed by architect Dan Rickli and the prestressed concrete is being supplied by Rocky Mtn. Prestress. First of all, there seems to be some question as to whether a 4 -hr or 3 -hr. separation is needed between and Fl and H occupancy. This question stems from the ratios of occupancy, Sec.503 (UBC), and whether a need exists for a compete area separation, or simply an occupancy separation. The questionable 4 -hr. rating is then interpreted as coming from Sec.505(c), which appears to refer to "walls ". Since an area separation would imply the entire area or envelope, it becomes a matter of interpretation as to whether "wall" also means floor. Jerry Aldrich and I went into some discussion of this matter on Thursday, July 19. We left the matter up in the air for the time being so that each of us could study the situation a little further. I have done just that, and in my opinion, Sec.505 definitely refers to walls only, or in other words, a separation between horizontally situated occupancies. There are ,just too many references to the walls extending upwards to meet horizontal members that would make it difficult to interpret the walls as meaning floors as well. This was not evident at the time that PRESTRESSED CLJ? Cf RrvSTiT UTE Jerry and I had our discussion, but it seems much more clear now. I hope that you agree, and if not, I would certainly like to discuss the matter in more detail with you. Regardless of whether a 3 or 4 -hr. rating is required, some protection must be applied to the double tees in order to meet the UBC requirements. Please look at Table 43 to see dust what is needed. On page 505, Table 43 -A, Item 34, we must provide adequate cover for the prestressing strand. A double tee is a floor or roof assmebly, much like the ordinary joist system, and is therefore considered in the "solid slab" category. By any one of several definitions it is not a beam or girder, nor is it tested in that manner. While solid slab" does not seem to adequately describe the member, it is the intent of the code to include double tees in that catagory. For a 3 -hr. rating, we need 2 inches of cover, considering Type A concrete. Since we supply Type B we must increase that cover to 2.4 inches (20% increase). For this project we are using an 18 inch double tee with two straight � -inch strand. The first is located 2 inches from the bottom of the stem (to centerline), and the second is 4 inches to centerline. The average cover is 1.84 inches, leaving an additional 0.56 inches to be supplied in some manner. Average cover is used as per Sec.403(c)3. As a substitute to the required additional 0.56 inches, we propose to spray the underside of the double tees with vermiculite. Standard ASTM E119 tests of this combination of materials are shown in several brochures contained in your CPA Fire Data Book. For simplicity, refer to the PCA publication, FIRE ENDURANCE OF TWO- COURSE FLOORS AND ROOFS, Fig. 13. Note at the bottom the 3 sets of charts. Most of our products are made with Siliceous aggregates, so that is the chart we must use (middle chart). Siliceous aggregate is also called Type B, as above. By using the 3 -hr. curve, you can equate � -inch of vermiculite to 1 -inch of concrete. If you have difficulty doing this, give me a call and I can show you the mechanics. By direct proportion, 1/4 -inch of vermiculite will furnish us with the equivalent 0. inches of concrete that is needed. By the same method, we can determine that � -inch of vermiculite would be needed if a 4 -hr. rating were required. That completes the first part of our task, that being the proper protection of the strand. The next requirement is to prevent temperature transmission through the flange (slab). For this requirement we must again turn to Table 43, this time on page 520. Under Item 1 we see that for 3 -hrs., a 5 -� inch slab is needed. Fc- 4 -hrs., a 6 -3 inch slab. For the moment, let us consider the 3 -hr. rating. 0 O Remember, that in order to protect the strand, we have sprayed the underside of the double tees with 1/4 -inch of vermiculite. We have this material also working for us in the slab. To determine ,just how much this will help us, again refer to the PCA publication, Fig. 13, middle chart. With 1/4 -inch of vermiculite, and going to the 3 -hr. curve, we need only 5- inches of concrete. Likewise, if considering 4 -hr. protection, with 1 -inch vermiculite, we still need only 5- 4 .nches of concrete. In summary, the underside of the double tees must be sprayed with vermiculite; 1/4 -inch for a 3 -hr. rating, and -inch for a 4 -hr. rating. With this thickness of spray -on, a 5 -inch slab will meet both a 3 or 4 -hr. rating. I have tried to make this as easy to read as possible, but am sure there still may be some confusion. Please give me a call if we can discuss this further. Sincerely, j 1 Walter Prebis, P.E. Execut Director c.c. Dan Rickli Dick Thornburg , Vwol Frasier & Gingery, /nc. :71VSLJLT/NG E/VG /NEEIaS W SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET L EWOOD, COLORADO 80110 FPHONE 303 761 -4860 July 5, 1973 Mr. Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail P.O. Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 • F111 JUL 10 1973 Re:. Landmark at Lionshead 'Plan Check for Compliance with Uniform Building Code Our Job No. 452.06 Dear Mr. Aldrich: By letter of June 14, 1973, the architect has responded to our Preliminary Review dated May 30, 1973. No revised drawings have been received. Comments to his response (attached hereto) are as follows: Item 1D Response interpreted to mean separation wall will be between units 7 and 8. Two layers 5/8" Type "X" drywall required at third floor ceiling of both units 7 and 8. For V -1 hour construction, partitions must have 1 hour rated drywall throughout. Item 2A Addition of 3/4" to topping thickness contributes nothing towards obtaining 4 hour separation. Prestress concrete tendons must be protected in accordance with Sec. 4303 -C -3 and Table 43 -A, Item 34. 4 -hour separation is required throughout the garage, not merely under the townhouses. Items 2B and 2C Contingent on Item 1D above. CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER & SANITATION page 2 Items 2D and 2E Approved Items 3A, 3B and 3C Contingent on Item 1D above Item 4A Approved, subject to revised drawings, Item 4B Subject to acceptance by the Building Official Item 5A Subject to Item 2A above. Item 5B 3 hour opening protection required. Labelled door for this rating is satisfactory; however, wire glass for adjacent panel has only a 3/4 hour rating per Sec. 4306 -h. Item 5C Not approved. See Item 2A above. Item 6A Acknowledged Item 6B Cannot check this item without revised plan. Item 6C Subject to acceptance by Building Official. Item 7 Acknowledged and approved. Item 8 Approved Items 9A and 9B Approved Item 10A Approved. See also Item 1D above. Item 10B Ladder not shown on drawings. Ladder subject to acceptance by Building Official. Item 11 Approved procedure. Not shown on drawings. page 3 Part B - Items 1 & 2 Approved. Aside from the items which are subject to your approval, the major questions remaining in our review are as follows: A. Positive implementation of the modifications to bring the townhouses into a Type V -1 hour classification. B. Complete isolation of the entire garage by 4 hour separa- tion necessitating compliant design of precast elements, walls and openings. As soon as the revised drawings indicating the manner in which these revisions are to be made have been submitted, we can complete our review of this project. Very truly yours, FRASIER /n Knud 0. Project KOR:gs Attachment & GINGERY, INC. Rasmussen, P.E. Manager cc: D. C. Rickli DANA CHRISTOPHER RICKLI Stine 14 1:'73 ARCHITECT 4045 S. BROADWAY SUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD • COLORADO 7894525 F'- esier and Cin Cons«ltinst T 294) S3uth Vallejo rr gle #33d, Colorado € 011C RF: Landmark at Llonshes4 (J31) 0432.06) Grntle-.-en: T` foll3wing i.s ie reply to your recent plan check an t`:c a_avc doh: Part .A 1D: Assume Type a 1 hour (town4oueps) 2 Lour separation wall is to '•e provided between grids S and a (Unit P) of townhot!ses - thick Oell lark and laminated drys all 2 sides, ane 518 " type "X'' ceilinas (2 la - ers) on units #8 are floor cellini. 2A ; Add to toppin ; ttiickuess at i 'S ara;;e er towni orl,) t:,'� pYOVid�e �R r ofparAt 6C►• Cllr" 00 5 2R- ' Pr lD ,^, "ui ID 2D: Poo to fire rstarled wood st. a,,lea AS allowed t)y Vail code. �Trtne� lb � 1 ^ i•��e ? ?wt All "terior woad to he 1 hour fire W resistl� -e trratrd ran Ise conies Rrc4 w� roof nrofections of towshoweo. IA: Townhoetses are ossup*d to be Type 5 1 hoer- all extorior ve11s are h2ork or drywall 2 sides of steel studs (plyi+nfld is or.1 a r.ouerin) 1 ��(M 39: See 3A 3C : 8" 3A tAs Wi ndws am A ord of totaa atr 1 LAtter to he arteined from utility department relative to 2" met }c+nt adlaeent *etr±A rAtAtned and never hti,llt on. ` Ashred _•B: Opensr.Q t�etwvrn C17 snd C13 to be wire 71mes with rarpd wet.eT door. SUS T 3 � (WIX) ! C: (4ro 2A) W-414 to tope, r ecenpied. ;4reas of tow*r far V�our , r. o t 141�. T(nv AA: ?tar on AR i r orr e ce. �P • " f de a �rrrrr l l ntAd (1 air ^►:Qr_re per rinvte) smoke proof enc losurr at la `•!E►. sr-e revf se plan (see 33nnH3 i rw.,) J :,re It 1 :773 pa): C- 3 f.C: 7 1 ovide sma e. &'etector in erquipF-. ;ent room as per Vail building official. T tvn %ovse=' windows are sh,-. iJn on sl' :cct A5 elevations and Dr. A' tw, t' (taor types. Apartr. :cat unit eoors are on sheet Al' and windows on A17 typical elevations. (Fast and ''Pat windava are on .11-1) Comxnerc:nl area let `I oar will have" door a `O . ess'.i shop as these areas are leased. All Ifireplaces are zero clearance type metal uith Metslbestos ;.'lues. T -P chiamey si a is are to I e protested by 1 }jot:: walls in Type V -I and 2 hours walls in type II arras. and B: [t.ai,lini;s are t:a rr as follows: Interior: 38" high exterior: 42" high (as detailed on A21. fietail 3 and 4. 1OA: K tcben ceilings under lofts are to Have 5 /V types `" drywall for 1 1 rated coiling. 10B : 1 ladder is to be provided fraou loft to living room of tof.niiouses - see derail. 11: Ducts are to ue provided from Ut e vent: Tatars as g0hown to Vie varage 4. floor at tilt east wall. cart B 1: S nce t % bui ldin& is fully electric JU", 14, 1;) Pa go 4 tho major equipment Le wall WAMAt#d spin- meters, tNlrne08e srui. jront' and mic-h vfh i c`i are sfxav ! an r! .oud W (sch -40 e) Watsr "tor t s to 1 in pest -- enlral roe. T+ � r + *Arrlq ��� -r nr•wri.tt� ;gas t1�?�'t1 rm- �!! {!lets '►+!� - '%!�"tt'�s �A9IftC�t�t`_�. Ver7 trt l.- wAt7rs, 1):V% CMfjISTOp rp PICKLI A-)..'711TTr( T !) ina (7 . " f 0,.1 a Ketchi - "int —I rnrre'tt N.ckel and .A ;stla Yc?-ill area "an' rl ��:Z1 Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, this day of A.D. 19 73 Notary Public My Commission expires Y77za c-r_J� /l0 19 7j ' PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) I, — t" K � do solemnly swear that I am the W - W62 a of THE VAIL TRAIL; that the same is a weekly newspaper PUBLIC NOTICE printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle, State of NOTICE IS HEREBY GLEN Colorado, and has a g eneral circulation therein; that said newspaper has been g + that Dana C. Rickli has fled an application with the Town of Vail for published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Eagle for a period of an exception to the parking more than fifty -two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the regulations imposed by the zoning annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to ordinance for the Town of Vail (Ordinance No. 7 (Series of 1969), as the United States mails as second -class matter under the provisions of the Act of amended), which application is on March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly file with the Town Clerk. be newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the A public hearingg held before the 'Town Co$ncil for the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. Town of Vail on said application at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and Tuesday, June 5, 1973, in the Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado, 1 to determine the request of the entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of ` applicant for an exception or variance from the parking regulations consecutive insertions; and that the first pubication of said notice was in the issue of the Town of Vail zoning ordinance. All interested persons may dated appear the pu and ar heard at the time of the public hearing. of said newspaper M �4 A.D. 19 and that the last DATED this fourteenth day of publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated May, 1973. WITNESS my hand and official v J t A.D. 1915 seal. ` TOWN OF VAIL By Lindig. Hall �1 Town, Clerk In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this day of ( Published in the Vail Trail on May 18, 1973. 0 � � � A.D. 19�� \ Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, this day of A.D. 19 73 Notary Public My Commission expires Y77za c-r_J� /l0 19 7j ' PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Dana C. Rickli has filed an application with the Town of Vail for an exception to the parking regu- lations imposed by the zoning ordinance for the Town of Vail (Ordinance No. 7 [Series of 1969], as amended), which application is on file with the Town Clerk. A public hearing will be held before the Town Council for the Town of Vail on said application at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. , Tuesday, June 5, 1973, in the Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado, to determine the request of the applicant for an exception or variance from the parking regulations of the Town of Vail zoning ordinance. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the time of the public hearing. DATED this fourteenth day of May, 1973. WITNESS my hand and official seal. TOWN OF VAI L Town Clerk APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE THE TOWN COUNCIL AND /OR VAIL PLANNING COMMISSION I App lication Date MA" -11 07S Hearing Date Hearing Fee I (We) C LI of 4&*5; :5O� (Applicant (Address C4L.0 V 1 �4 4 6LWIICWD — ,Phone (State) (City) do hereby request permission to appear before the Town Council Planning Commission to request the following: Zoning Change from Parking Variance Conditional Use Permit to allow and /or Vail to in Zone. `,kKT v For the following described property: Lot AI' Block ONE F i I i n g Numb e r YM t✓ � tO►�4Sti'�''kD '► LI h.Lr.� ; 3 Ordinance and Sections being appealed: Ordinance of , Section(s) . Series Clearly state purpose and intent of this application To KErPV What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this: -- - S �- Lam' 2 _& _r Signature of Applicant INSTRUCTIONS: "I. Form must be submitted in triplicate, and all copies must be signed. 2. A plat map drawn in triplicate to a scale of not less than 200 feet to the inch showing the land in question, its location, the length and direction of each boundary thereof, the location and existing use of all buildings on such land and the principal use of all properties within 300 feet of such land. If the application is for a parking variance, show parking provided, drawn to scale and numbered to indicate the spaces. 3. The names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 300 feet of any part of the land included in the proposed variance. 4. All information required by the Subdivision Regulations for preliminary plats where applicable. 5. The Town Council and /or the Plannine Commission will set a hearing date not more than thirty (30) days from the request for zoning change, application for parking variance or conditional use permit. 6. Not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the hearing, the hearing authority shall cause a copy of a notice of the time and place of such hearing to b-- ubIished once in a newspaper or generai circulation in the County of Eagle. Ali property owners in (3) above shall be notified of said application and hearing. lovil it box 100 • vaiI, colorado 81657 • 303.476 -5613 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Date Submitted May 2, 1973 TO: FRASIER & GINGERY, INC. 2840 South Vallejo Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Please provide Plan Check service on plans for the following structure: I. Name of Project Landmark 2. Address of Project Lot 3, Blk. I, Vail /Lionshead -First 3. Name of Owner Joseph L. Levin 4. Two sets of plans, calculations and specifications: Enclosed ( ) Under Separate Cover 0() To be Delivered by Owner ( ) Other ( ) 5. Please check plans under the current Edition of the Uniform Building Codes as adopted and amended by the Town of Vail. Signature Fire Zone 3 Seismic Zone 1 Wind Load 30 Snow Load 65 Frost Depth 42 Signature 0 0 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Dana C. Rickli has filed an application with the Town of Vail for an exception to the parking regu- lations imposed by the zoning ordinance for the Town of Vail (Ordinance No. 7 [Series of 1969], as amended), which application is on file with the Town Clerk. A public hearing will be held before the Town Council for the Town of Vail on said application at the hour of 7;30 o'clock p.m., Tuesday, May 15, 1973, in the Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado, to determine the request of the applicant for an exception or variance from the parking regulations of the Town of Vail zoning ordinance. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the time of the public hearing. DATED this sixteenth day of April, 1973. WITNESS my hand and official seal. TOWN OF VAI L Town Clerk DANA CHRISTOPHER RICKLI ARCHITECT 4045 S. BROADWAY SUITE 204 ENGLEWOOD -COLORADO 7894525 April 4, 1973 Toxin of Vail Vail Municipal Offices Vail, Colorado 81657 RE: Parking variance for Landmark at Lionshead Gentlemen: As per agreement at the plan reviev7 meet- ing on the 20th of March we agree to the following as recommended: a. Delete 25 parking spaces alone the south property line. b. Replace these spaces with a land- scaped area that is a continuation of what was submitted on our land- scape plan. c. Agree, that should the parking sit- uation in Lionshead greatly change so that the 8 required spaces would be required, to convert the landscaped area to parking for 8 vehicles. Yours truly, DAN HRISTOPH SIC LI ARCHITECTS Dana C. Rickli DCR:ly 10WHI of vom box 100 • vail, colorado 81657 • 303.476 -5613 March 20, 1973 TO: TOWN COUNCIL TERRY MINGER PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KENT ROSE JIM LAMONT DIANA TOUGHILL RE: STAFF REVIEW OF LANDMARK AT VAIL i After careful review of the subject project, the Town staff would like to make the following recommendations: Cooperation should be sought between the developer and Vai M Associates to provide a buffer between the Landmark project and the Vail Associates Parking lot. We suggest the use of berms and heavy landscaping. 2. The 13 parking spaces on the south side of project should be eliminated and landscaping substituted as these spaces are not required and this would be an effective visual break in a large expanse of asphalt. 3. Grades on garage ramps appear to be very steep and we would suggest that ramps be heated to avoid a traffic hazard into and out of site. 4. More wood could be used on the taller section of the structure to make it more compatible with the townhouse section. 5. The severe facade of the commercial spaces could be softened. 6. A complete landscaping plan should be submitted for approval 7. All signs must be approved by the Sign Review Committee. M F Frasier & Gingery, /nc. CONSULT /NG ENG /VEERS 1840 SOUTH VAL L EJO STREET ENGL EWOOD, COLORADO 80110 TELEPHONE 303 761 -4860 May 23, 1973 Mr. Jerry Aldrich Chief Building Official Town of Vail P. 0. Box 100 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Landmark h.t Lionshead - Plan Check Job No. 452.06 Dear Jerry: As per your instructions, we the Plan Check of the subject project. take -off of general building data is a pect to complete our review during the A preliminary report will be delivered to, May 29, 1973. are proceeding with Our preliminary ttached. We ex- week of May 21st. to you on, or prior We are happy to have this additional opportunity to provide our services to the Town of Vail. Very truly yours, FRASIER & GINGERY, INC. K. 0. Rasmussen, P.E. Project Engineer KOR /gb Att. CIVIL ENGINEERING / LAND SURVEYING / STORM DRAINAGE / STRUCTURAL / TRANSPORTATION / WATER & SANITATION GENERAL Developer: Architect: Structural Engineer: Mechanical Engineer: Electrical Engineer: BUILDING DATA Use: Group Occupancy: Type of Construction: Fire Zone: Stories: Floor Areas: Occupant Load: IT AT TTATTONT LANDMARK AT LIONSHEAD Project Data Sheet Job No. 452.06 Joseph L. Levine Dana Christopher Ricki KKBNA, Consulting Engineers McFall & Konkel Sol Flax & Assoc. Apartment House Office & Retail Garage Apartments - H Offices - F2 Retail - F2 Garage - F1 Types II & V -N 3 4 & 9 Stories Apartments - Type II Apartments - Type V -N Offices - Retail Garages Decks & Balconies Apartments - Type II Apartments - Type V -N Offices - Retail Garages H Occupancy - Type II 43,399 S.F. @$24.00 = H Occupancy - Type V -N 25,496 S.F. @ $22.00 = Fl Occupancy - Type II 24,054 S.F. @$18.00 = F2 Occupancy - Type II 13,281 S.F. @$22.00 = Balconies and Decks 34,743 S.F. @$6.00 = Total Permit Fee: Plan Review Fee: 43,399 S.F. 25,496 S.F. 13,281 S.F. 24,054 S.F. 34,743 S.F. 217 persons 125 it 443 it 121 if $1,041,576 560,912 432,972 292,182 208,458 $2,536,100 $2,662.60 $1,331.30 KOR 5/23/73 Plarch 23, 1973 Mr. Dana Rickli 4045 South Broadway Denver, Colorado Subject: Design Review of Landmark at Vail Dear Mr. Rickl i : Landmark at Vail has been approved by the Tow Council subject to approval of fire Fire Chief and negotiations with the Town Staff on the following items: I. Cooperation should be sought between the developer and Vail Associates to provide a buffer between the Landmark project and the Vail Associates parking lot. 2. The 13 parking spaces which are not required will be removed and landscaping substituted. A parking concession has been granted to remove the eight additional spaces in the same area with the agreement that the Town Council may require the eight spaces to be reinstated if, in their opinion, the parking is needed at any time in the future. 3. Ramps to parking garage will be heated. 4. Facades on the structures should be studied in an attempt to make the two portions of the project cor;patible. 5. The landscapin plan which was submitted must be approved. 6. All signs must be approved by the Sign Review Committee. Please complete the enclosed application for a parking variance as a matter of formality, and submit it with a letter stating that you agree to reinstate the parkinS in the event it is determined to be necessary. if you have further questions, please contact the Building Department. Yours truly, TOWN OF VAIL TorreI I J, r4i no, er Town Planager M March 20, 1973 TO: TOWN COUNCIL TERRY MINDER PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KENT ROSE JIM LAMONT DIANA TOUGHILL RE: STAFF REVIEW OF LANDMARK AT VAIL After careful review of the subject project, the Town staff would like to make the foI1owinee recommendations: I. Cooperation should be sought between the developer and Vail Associates to provide a buffer between the Landmark project and the Vail Associates Parking lot. rye suggest the use of berms and heavy landscaping. 2. The 13 parking spaces on the south side of project should be eliminated and landscaping substituted as these spaces are not required and this would be an effective visual break in a large expanse of asphalt. 3. Grades on garage ramps appear to be very steep and we would suggest that ramps be heated to avoid a traffic hazard into and out of site. 4. More wood could be used on the taller section of the structure to make it more compatible with the townhouse section,. 5. The severe facade of the commercial spaces could be softened. 6. A complete landscaping plan should be submitted for approval 7. All sirens must be approved by the Sign Review Committee. d DANA CHRISTOPHER RICKLI 4045 South Broadway Englewood, Colorado 303/789 -4525 i ARCHITECT Suite 204 80110 LANDMARK AT LIONSHEAD CONDOMINIUMS: Total Lot Area: Floor Area Ratio: Allowable Sq. Ft.: Townhouses A February 19, 1973 65,296.0 sq. ft. 1.25 81 ,620.0 14 one - bedroom units @ 652 sq. ft. 14 three - bedroom units @ 1144 sq. ft. 1• Apartments Basement: Toilets, Laundry, Lobby = 1,305 First F1: 4 two -bedr. units, _1 office = ,v4 - ':1 5,100 Second F1 : 5 two -bedr. units = + 9., -6,052 Third Fl: 4 two -bedr. units, 1 4 bedr. _ ? 4 '` ;x 6,052 Fourth F1: 4 two -bedr. units, 1 4 bedr.= r 4r7 ' Fifth F1: 2 two -bedr. units, 3 4 bedr. _ 46 6,052 Sixth F1: 2 two -bedr. units, 3 4 bedr. = 2 . s ' 5,152 Seventh F1 :5 three -bedr. units = 2 S 4 •4z 6,052 Loft:. 5 lofts = 1,125 30 Units Total Retail /Office Space First Floor: 6,880 Second Floor: 6,954 9,128 / 16,016 Xa•a 2— 7. �p,ss r i 01 42,640 13,834 81,618 M, Parking _ 14 1 b d e r. Townhouses @ 652 sq. ft. = 1.25 x 14 = 17.5 14 3 bedr. Townhouses @ 1144 sq. ft. = 1.50 x 14 = 21.0 21 2 bedr. Apartments @ 1000 sq. ft. = 1.25 x 21 = 26.2 5 3 bedr. Apartments @ 1225 sq. ft. = 1.5 x 5 = 7.5 4 4 bedr. Apartments @ 1693 sq. ft. = 2.0 x 4 = 8.0 Retail/Office @ 13,834 @ 3/1000 Condominium Office @ 777 sq. ft. = 3.0 20 x 40 Pool 64 x 120 Private Activities Deck Paddle Tennis Court Saunas in each Unit Total Site Area: 65,296 sq. ft. Ground Coverage: 21,288 Open Space: 44,000 sq. ft. Provided - - 65% Open f { I Ir- I PROD ECT Arch i tect Legal Description Use Zane Does Use Conform F.A.R. Allowed Lot Size, Plaza Credit F.A.R. Actual Allowable Square Footage Actual Square Footage , Over (Under) Setback Requirements: Front /.� , S i des I ,ld , Rear Setback Provided: Front �3� S i des Rear /3 Parking Required Parkinc Provided: Covered Uncovered Total Provided: I l F.A.R. AND PARKING CALCULATIONS Nz f (ISe v .ai7{ . I _ 3 �t2 Fns f�- Checked By Date I COMMENTS ON REVERSE SIDE DANA CHRISTOPHER RICKLI ARCHITECT 4045 South Broadway Suite 204 Englewood, Colorado 80110 303/789 -4525 LANDMARK AT LIONSHEAD CONDOMINIUMS: Total Lot Area: Floor Area Ratio: Allowable Sq. Ft.: Townhouses 14 one - bedroom units @ 652 sq. ft. _ 14 three - bedroom units @ 1144 sq. ft. _ Apartments Basement: Toilets, Laundry, Lobby = I Y First F1: 4 two -bedr. units, 1 office = �i Second Fl: 5 two -bedr. units = Third Fl: 4 two -bedr. units, 1 4 bedr. _ Fourth Fl: 4 two -bedr. units, 1 4 bedr.= Fifth Fl: 2 two -bedr. units, 3 4 bedr. = Sixth Fl: 2 two -bedr. units, 3 4 bedr. = Seventh F1:5 three -bedr. units = Loft: 5 lofts = 30 Units Total Retail /Office Space First Floor: 6,880 Second Floor: 6,954 February 19, 1973 65,296.0 sq. ft. 1.25 81 ,620.0 1,305 5,100 6,052 6,052 5,752 6,052 5,152 6 ,052 1 ,125 9 12 16,016 42,640 13,834 81 ,618 ��� 5 Parking 14 1 bedr. Townhouses @ 652 sq. ft. 14 3 bedr. Townhouses @ 1144 sq. ft. 21 2 bedr. Apartments @ 1000 sq. ft. 5 3 bedr. Apartments @ 1225 sq. ft. 4 4 bedr. Apartments @ 1693 sq. ft. Retail /Office @ 13,834 @ 3/1000 Condominium Office @ 777 sq. ft. = 1.25 x 14 = 17.5 = 1.50 x 14 = 21.0 = 1.25 x 21 = 26.2 = 1 .5 x 5 = 7.5 = 2.0 x 4 = 8.0 = 41.4 _ n 124.6 Provided - 125 20 x 40 Pool 64 x 120 Private Activities Deck Paddle Tennis Court Saunas in each Unit Total Site Area: Ground Coverage: Open Space: 65,296 sq. ft. 21 , 288 44,000 sq. ft. 05% Open 40C. V PFtcr DATE ECT' i ts; ;•': � '�►�. f t lii�s been brought to the t "tent l on of h s of i i "'c: concrete test taken (dai 13 � ,�� ( � � -� � c , i ' h as . '� � '�" �.�, Sho :n low esults in preliminary test FU JAN 171974 i I c d D tier _ ._ - - -- -- -- The location of test i s : s You are hereby notif i future construction upon said location is at your risk until one of the fol!oi -ring correction methods is achieved. 1. Recalculation of imposed design load showing • concrete strength as tested is aceeua ��e, upon letter from structural engineer. 2. Core test that shows required s 3. Adequate reinforcing of 4. Removal of low unit and acceptable concrete. Fi,nui inspection and issuance of wi I l .be wii uni 1 this matt low unit. rep I acement w i th certificate of occ::pancy er is corrected . J IRRY L. ALDRICt' C IEF BUILDING OFFICIAL 0 Arl - s Mate gals Testi 2531 West 8th Ave. Ljg5 -5261 Also: Dillon, Longmont . enver, Colo. 80204 Vail, Castle Rock MATERIALS REPORT for Mier Construction — Landmark Truck 509 Job No or I. D. 922_1 Ticket i'1_1795 Date Tested: 10 -31 -73 Mix I.D.: 5j sk Slump: Water Temp.: hot water Total Yards: 1$* Max. Agg. Size: 3/4" Time Batched: 11:40 Spec. P.S.I. at 28 Days:_ Location: Elevator walls & beam line 7 5 Air: 3." Wt,/Cu. Ft. :142. 80 Yi el d: Air Temp.: 37 Concrete Temp.: 59 Total Water: +5 gals. F A Moisture: Max. Size Load C.Y.: 7 Weather: cold & snow Time Placed: 12:25 Time Tested: 12 :40 3000 Tested By: Don & Lana TEST CYLINDERS 922 -1 (Set 31) Cylinder Dia. 2@ 7 Day Cylinder Dia @ 14 Day 5.998 1592 6.003 1802 Average: 1696 6.007 2046 Cylinder Dia 2@28 Day 2134 2186 2160 REMARKS:porto Mix 1 Hold no calcium chloride on ticket 5.998 2583 REPORT TO: Mier Construction; Dana Rickli; KKBNA;4upervisor; Vail December 12, 1972 M r . ' . I I I l i am E. Coffey Copper Development Association, Inc. P. o. Box 9036, South Deriver Station Denver, Colorado 80209 Dear Mr. Coffey: Asiper our telephone conversation this date, may this letter serve as authorization to design and instatl an area experimental Sovent Plumbing Systen within the Town of Vail, upon the following conditions: I. The entire system be desirMed by a registered professional mechan- ical encineer. 2. Final drawings shall be submitted to Copper Development Associa- tion who in turn shall check for compliance to Sovent desicn and submit letter to mechanical en «ineer confirming same. A copy of said letter shall be sent to this office. 3. A letter from the developer assuming liability for the system. shall be submitted to this office. 4. Periodic and final inspection shall be made by a Qualified individual representing the Copper Development Association. If you have any qucstions or comments, please feel free to contact r e . Yours truly, T O W 4 1 OF V A I L Jerry L. Aldrich Building Official dt cc: Kent Rose, P.E., Town Engineer