HomeMy WebLinkAboutBridge Street Lodge Redevelopment 1995 (3 of 4) 1- • �' � ! �
�•Y � ,v
M�� �V�
�y
TOWN OF VAIL �
75 South Frontage Road Departr►ient of Communiry Development
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138/479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
March 8, 1995
Craig Snowdon
Snov�don & Hopkins Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Golden Peak House Redevelopment
Dear Craig:
As you are aware, the Town is in receipt of a Buiiding Permit Application for the
redevelopment of the Golden Peak House. I thought it would be helpful to outline the
planning issues which must be resalved prior to the Town's issuance of the building permit.
For your information, I have attached a copy of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1593, which in
Section 8, details the conditions placed on the Golden Peak House redevelopment.
Additionally, I have attached a letter to you dated December 16, 1994, which outlines the final
DRB approval of the Golden Peak House and the five con�itions which are a part of that
approval.
As we discussed on the telephone yesterday, it is my understanding that you �vill be
submitting to the Town revised floor plans which reflect the drawirgs approved by the Town
and listed on Page 3 of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993. I would like to make it absolutely
clear that the current set of Building Permit drawings cannot be approved by the Town in their
current form, due to the fact that the floor plans have been modified, and in my opinion, the
approved density for the project has changed.
Prior to th� Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment of the Gold Peak
House, the following must be accomplished:
_�oNe ---�U That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD No.
31, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-
bedroom, employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit T��
shall be a minimum size of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail E�L��
Housing Ordinance requirements and such units shall be within the To�vn of Vail.
OK �L`/ That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment project,
the Golden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute $32,000.00 towards
the redesign and redeve�opment of Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards
the redevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House,
should a future Special Improvement District be created for this project.
O �� That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment project,
Vail Associates, Inc., will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of
open space shall be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E
,
�
I : �
. ... �
"overhand and deck" easements. A portion of the Mill Creek stream tract will be
dedicated to the Town of Vail as permanent open space and the Pirate Ship Park area
of Tract E will be leased to the Town of Vail for the purpos�'e'of maintaining e park.
The terms of the lease are to be agreed upon by the parties.
�� — � That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates, Inc. shall
reserve a public pedestrian access, across Lot C, which is located between the Golden
Peak House and the Hill Building, by declaration to be recorded with the Eagle County
Clerk & Recorder. Such declaration shall be permanent and only revocable upon
written agreement with the Town of Vail. The declaration of public pedestrian access
shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a bui{ding permit for the project.
d/( � That the final design of the exterior mechanical equipmentr which is proposed to be
located on the south side of the elevator tower, be reviewed and approved by the
planning staff. This is according to the DRB approval of December 7, 1994.
DK — � That the minor subdivision process, which was initiated and approved in 1993, be
completed. This would require the submittal of the final plat to the Town of Vail, for
review and approval, and the subsequent recording of said plat at the Eagle County
Clerk and Recorder's office.
(��{ --� The exterior steel railing, proposed at the southeast corner of the building, will need to
be reviewed and approved by the DRB. This element was not included in the final
DRB review on December 7, 1994. It would be acce table to defer this issue until
after the permit is issued You may wish to include this item in your DR�B sub-mi a for
e exterior ighting, sign program and final lant west side .
�1 '`-5z�/
4K �°'' As recently discussed with Lee Neely of your office, additional information will need to ��
be submitted to the Town indicating that portions of the fourth floor (western end)
meets the 5' height requirement from the top of the finished floor to the bottom side of
the structural members of the roof. I believe Lee understands what is necessary to be
submitted.
I am available to meet with you to discuss any of the above outstanding issues, so please do
not hesitate to contact me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
�� �"(�
Mike Mollica,
Acting Director of Community Development
XC: Clark Willingham
Gary Murrain
Enc.: Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993
Letter - Dec. 16, 1994
f:\everyon e\a ndy\lette rs\go fdp ea
. � � � � !
��� �
���
„ �
��,
TOI�N OF VAIL �
75 South Frontage Road Deparr�nent of Commu�tiry Developme�Tt
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138/479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
December 16, 1994
Mr. Craig Snowdon
Snowdon and Hopkins Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
RE: The Golden Peak House redevelopment
Dear Craig:
On December 7, 1994, the Design Review Board (DRB) unanimously (by a vo`a of 5-0)
approved the finai design for the Golden Peak House redevelopment. Congratulations!
The final DRB approval did carry with it the following five conditions:
1. That the previously discussed rooftop unit (chiiler) has now been eliminated
from the design. �
2. That the developer agree to come back to the DRB for review and approval of
a sign program for the entire building.
3. That the developer agree to come back to the DRB for revie�v and approval of
the final planter design, which is proposed to be located in the skier access,
along the western efevation of the siructure.
4. That the final design of the exterior mechanicai equipmert, which is proposed
- to be located on the south side of the elevator tower, be reviewed and
approved by the planning staff.
5. That the appiicant consider the use of stone, as a base materiai, around the
perimeter of the building versus the use of the vertical pavers.
if you should have any questions regarding any of the above, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 479-2138. Again, congratulations on your final DRB approval.
Sincerely,
%v� / -I��-�
Mike Mollica
Acting Director of Community Development
I
� • � . - �' / � �
, •� • ��„Y,,, i
y ...
--� �� ,�� / O/�'"�- . .
ORDINANCE NO. 28 , r,�►-�--Q °�
SERIES OF 1993
_—-- ��
- —_______ _-___----
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF
THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; RELONING A PORTION OF TRACT E FROM AGRICULTURAL
AND OPEN SPACE ZONING TO COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONING, AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
dist�icts within the Town in order to oncourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS,the developer,Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates.
Inc./GPH Partners. Ltd./Mtargaritaviile, Inc. or the successors in interest, has submitted an
application for the establishment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31, which includes
a request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration, a request for a minor subdivision� and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1, for a certain parcel of property withln the
Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village First
Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS,the developer has submitted an application to rezone a port;on of Tract E.Vail
Village Fifth Filing, more specifically described in the attached Exhibit A,from the Agricultural and
Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone district; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediately
.,
adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort will better reflect the actual use of the land; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is for the benefit of the community as it meets the
municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehenslve Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1 a.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission� on October 11. 1993, held�public hearing on the establishment of an SDD and the
rezoning, and has submitted its recommendation to tho Town Council; and
� 1
o�dk,.�,o.r�o.se.s«�..a��
� : � .�•/ . �
• �.,•,,. 1
s �
....r
� WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Councit considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial
to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to establish SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has heid a public hearing as'required by Chapter 18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW� THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
� VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1 -
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fulty satisfied.
SECTION 2
Special Development District No.31 is established to ensure comprehensive development ,
and use of an area in a manner that will be haRnonious with the general character of the Town�
provide adequate open space.employee housing,streetscape improvements and other amenities,
� and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental
Commission, and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
.
Special Development District No.31 is established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District
No. 31 and said 8,375 square feet may be roferred to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4 �
The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in
Section 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all of the
requlrements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been
fully satisfied.
SECTION 5
The Town Council hereby rezones that portion of Tract E legally described ln the attached
• � 2
� Ordinuiw No.28.Ssriss d 1093
. � •. .,� ► ( Q � � .
' ��µw �
� _. ..
Exhlblt A, from the Agricultural and Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core i zone
district.
SECTION.6 '
The Town Council finds that the devolopment plan for SDD. No. 31 meets each of the
standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or
demonstrates that either one or more of thom is not applicable. or that a practical solution �
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the
development plan for SDD No. 31 is approvQd. The development plan is comprised of those
plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Archltects, and consists of the foliowing documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site pian).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated October 25, 1893 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, 1993 (socond floor plan).
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated October 25,.1993 (third floor plan).
6. Sheet No. A-10� dated October 25, 1993 (fourth floor plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1893 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated October 25, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated October 25, 1993 (buiiding elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14. dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
� 12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the dovelopment standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 7
In addition to the Approved Developmont Plan described in Section 6 above�the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Councii; these
standards are incorporated In the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the
development of SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31: '
A. Lot Area- The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks - The required sQtbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans. .
C. Height - The max(mum hefght of the Goiden Peak House Building shall be as
3
o�d:�.�oe r�o.ze,s«�e.a,ce�
. . � r � •1 / � � �,
. ' �' ��i.... �
indicated on the Approved Development Plans.
D. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Goiden Peak House shall not
exceed 18,715 square feet. This figure inciudes 2,847 square feet of excess common area that
has been included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes •
fourteen (14) dwelling units and two (2) accommodation units, for a total of fifteen (15) cfweiling
units. Three of the dwelling units aro approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage-The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94% of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plans.
F. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved
Development Plans.
G. Park�ng -As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all p�oporties located within ttie Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by GPH Partners�
Ltd.paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The required number of parking spaces� in
accordance with the ApprovQd Development Plan for SDD No. 31, shall be a total of 13.794
parking spaces. Payment into the parking fund shall occur at the time of Building Permit,
according to Section 18.52.160(B�5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
•SECTION 8
The developer, Jolntly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are
a part of the Town's approval of the establlshment of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD
No. 31� GPH Partners, Lki, shall cause to be permanently restrlcted, two off-site� two-
bedroom� employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be
a minimum size of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance
requfrements �rtt� such un1�s shall be wlthin #he Town �Valr.
2. That p�ior to the Town's Issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment
proJect,the Golden Peak House Condominlum Assoclatlon will contribute$32,000.00 towards
the redesign and redovolopment of Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards the
�edevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be credited towarcis the Golden Peak House, should a
future Special Improvement District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's IssuancQ of a building poRnit for the redevelopment
project,Vall Assoclates, Inc.�will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open
4 '
Ordiw�o�No.2H,Ssris�d 1�G3
. : _• . •
- :�f .
. ti,_ . �
space shall be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overtiang and deck"
easements. �.:pqr�l4n,q! th� Mtif..Creek 5trearn tract wiil b�,dedlCat�id t� th�Tqwn pf Y�tl.
�s.perman�nt.:�pet�:$p�co.an�.�he Ptrate St�(p Park �rQa c�t:Tr�Gt �:w�A �� leasad to..tttm
Tawn oi Y�(i fc�r �he� ,purpo�� af:matnta(ntng:th�;park. .,Th� �erms+��t►t� t�a�e.ar,a:,tq b�.
�gra�d �pan by;tt�e par�1��.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Assoclatlon and Vall Assoclates,
Inc. shall reserve�.;publlc;.pede�trtan access accoss 1ot C, whlch 1s ibcated bQtwe�n th�: .
.: ......... .....,.
Gorden Pcak House.and the Hll� �uildln�,::�iy tlectar�tion to::be recorded wlth:the ��1�
Coun#y:Recorder �uch tleclaratton ahali b� permenent and c�niy r�yocable �pon v�rrttten
�agreement with the Town of U�il '1 i�e decf�rattnn.o#pubitc pe�estrlan access shai�occur
prtor to the 7'own's:.rssuance ot a,bulldin�:permit:for the.�ro�ect.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall dee�d restnct two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401� to bo included in �short-term rental program, �it.C�tl'1p�r�bl�,NtlArk�t;t'�t�;
at all times when satd dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
�,� 6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
�D,
'� redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building�or equlvalen� to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparabie.market
� . ____.
ieAt�S:� at aii times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for tt�e
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall_deQd restrict, the two accommodation units(or
equivalertt) in the building, to bQ inciuded in A short-term rentai program,�it;Cor�iipa�a'kile!:�ri'ii�:i`ke�
i�it�s;'at all times when said accommodation units arQ not occupiod by the owner or his or her
guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominlum Associatlon, or their successors
(n interest, shall participate in, and shaii not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement .
district(s) which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing
improvements as set forth in tfie Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail
Transportation Master Plan, if and when an improvement district(s) is formed.
�� That�he +�ald�ri P��k Haus� �onddmtr�lum Asspalattar� ar�d;t�PH..Partr�ersk �
�.id...shalt caap�rAto with,and�hall nQY prntost or remohstra�t���aln�t,�h.y �tfarts by tri�
To�wn nf Y+dlf ta e�t�btlst� �ddl�tona� vl�+� �orrJdArs ar am�endme�ts .t� �x)sttng xl�w
�r�dar��s enh�ced by tha..Pr�Jeat..:Su�h.:�h�ngas a�nd�dd(tinns�h�1r:� purs�ca�t�;,ta°
5
O�dkwas No.28.Sale�d toD:l '
�
� ._ • '+ �� � �
. • � `w.. I
1 .
t��..MunlCip�t.�p��.`p� #he.Tqw�.pf Y�11�
1 p: That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the orfginal ground floor plan, which does not include
the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of the buiiding, be rev(ewed by the Design
Review Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11�: That GPH Partners, Ltd.further articulate thQ first floor"retail windows",by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry
on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
� 1� That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 9
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may
be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public
hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments
which do change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by
Town Council after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development
Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
SECTION 10
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three
(3) years from the timo of lts final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project `f ty� devel�p�r m�r$t m�+et th�<r�q�tr�menfs o�:9eGttpr�:�t�:�0.�12A.ot ihe.Munt�tpal
Code bf tha Tawh dfi:Vait�
SECTION 11 .,
If any part, soction� sentence, clause� or phrase of this orclinance Is for any reason held
to be invalid,such decision shall not affect the validity of the rematning portions of this ordinance;
and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance� and each part�
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections� sentences, clauses� or phrases be declared invalid. �
SECTION 12
The Town Council hereby finds,determines and declares that this orcJinance ls necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 13
- The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any proviston of the Vail Municipal Code as
,
6 �
o�ati.�,o.rb.za.s.a..o���o
�
� '_. " '� �' r , � �
`' • • " '�a..a.. � ' .
provided in this orciinance shall not affect any right whtch has accrued, any duty imposed� any
violation that occurred p�ior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed
and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shali not �evive any provisions or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ. APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON
FIRST READING this 19th day of October, 1993, and a public hea�ing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the 2nd day of November. 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail �
Municipai Building, Vaii, Colorado. .
. �
�
. Margare A. Ostertoss, Mayor �
ATi'EST:
aZ�e e
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
IN FULL this 2nd day of November, 1993.
��
Margaret . Osterfoss� Mayor
ATTEST:
duc.�oc�?`��Cu.,� � � . .
Holly L. McCutcheon, Tow� Clerk
' �y
c:ao�se •
7
• Ordkw�w Nw 28.S«fM d 1003
` =_= � � �I �
r �..'i:�
� 'G
DECLARATION OF FUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
TH S DECLAR.ATION OF PUBLIC PEDrSTRIAN ACCESS made this �
day of ;•f�►h�r, 1995 is made by Vail Associates, Inc . , a Colorado
corporation and the Golden Peak House Condominium Association,
Inc . , a Colorado non-profit corpor.ation (the "Association" ) .
RECITALS
1 . The Vail Corpora�ion, doing busir�ess as Vail Associates, Ir,c.
( "Vail Associates" ) is the owner of Lot c-1 ( "Lot c-1" ) , according
to the map recorded in Book 665 at Page 983 in the office of the
� �agle County Clerk and Recorder (the "Plat" ) .
2 . The Association is the owner of the parcel of land identified
as '°�oiden reak House" as snown on and accordir.g� to the Piat ;t:ze
"Asscciaticr_ Lct" ) .
3 . Vail Associates desires to declare Lot c-1 to be a public
pedestrian access in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth below.
4 . The Association desires to declare that portion of the
Association Lot shown and crosshatched on Exhibit A hereof (the
"Association Parcel" ) to be a public pedestrian access in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below.
DECLAREITION OF PIIBLIC ACCESS
NOW THEREFCRE, Vail Associates hereby declares Lot c-1 and
the Association declares the Association Parcel to be a perpetual
public pedestrian access (collectively, the "Pedestrian Access" ) .
The Pedestrian Access shall be a burden to Lot c-1 and the
Association Parcel and shall run with the land.
The Pedestrian Access shall not be abandoned or vacated unless
memorialized in a document recorded in the public records of Eagle
Count�r, Colorado ar_c� sigr_ed by the Town of Vai.l approv�na s>>ch --�.
abandonment and vacation. :�:
_'3
At such time as the construction of the Golden Peak House is ��
completed, the Association shall amend this Declaration by �'
providing a new Exhibit A which shall contain a metes and bounds �
description of the Association Parcel and substitute such new
E�chibit A with Exhibit A hereof, provided, however, that no other
term or provision of this Declaration shall be changed or amended.
Subject to the terms and provisions of this Declaration, Vail
Associates and the Association retain all their respective rights,
title and interest in and to Lot c-1 and the Association Parcel .
574206 B-678 P-195 10/13/95 01 : 51P PG 1 OF 3 REC DOC
Sara J. Fisher Eagle County Clerk & Recorder_ 16 . 00
c � � �
; 574206 B-678 P-195 10/13/95 01 : 51P PG 2 OF 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Declaration of Pedestrian Public Access as of the day and year
first above written.
ATTiST: VAIL ASSOCIATES, NC.
�
f
� By. f� t.��--.
Secretary � President
AT'TSST: GOLDEN PEAit HOUSE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, INC.
�
, By; �
Secretary President
STATE OF COLOR�IDO )
) ss .
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
•� � The;`for.egy�ing instrument was acknowl dged before me this ��
� da� ,of.: r� b2r , 1995 by � f�S
'��s "S(r.;�= ;c e President and -=�� yr � as S , �
� , •�e�.<eta.�y oi vail Associates, Inc. .
�;: -
- -:, �.-; ;�� -
. ,-`� , '�a, -yTnti�:ness my hand and of f icial seal .
.. �
..M•°°°''�Iy �commission expires 3f Z� �GiG� C `�
' ^��r- ,�. �;�
, .._. . � �
- ' Notary Public �
STATE OF COLORADO )
'psNV�� ) ss .
C�T�Y �'-COUNTY OF-�A�rE )
The foregoing instrument was ackno ledge before me this 3�
day o f �� ,rn�p,r' , 19 9 5 by o s.s� h � �n Q
as � T President and ' � as
Secretary of Golden Peak House Condominiu Association, Inc.
���"""''��4G�.�ness my hand and official seal .
'?�,�aN1 E R�fC►'':
.
�p• ,-----t y:
;'�, � 1�r, cammission expires : 023
j�� � 1 A�c , s - , �
• : ,k -
.
* s _.-.-•- .
_ , .
; �, s = Notary Public
�J J` ' ;
ti,� � .�, o;
; s�,q ,�.....-�'' Q�Q.•
�''�..T��O F�CO��`''�
K � `1 ��ti�f �
, �
4 , pag � / � I
� ,
:�
o ,
�,
M '
� '
a ! L- e� e ��
' a .
[� r
; • -��on �ar�e �
, � �'SS D �.1 GL �
� / . '�
� / \
� � ' �l ��- G; �s'`~-�'- , �
� � • �� �P.� �v�r�� ;� - �
� r
��
� � � � Z��J �r���7 � �,�
� ` '), ,, � f�.
� / / �' / r°1
/ � � "�
� . / �_ � �
-i \ 1�� _ \ "
� _� \ \ � �/_ -- � "�,�.
\ � �/ r � �^��..�•�� �,�`�'�, �� � � ��:
1 � �,/ �� '�' t� �'��` X•`�" '�� \�-
� ' \ 1 • \�� \ k �t ;� � `
� \ + ��\ �\ t� ������ `��•' �\~� ����`'•'� ��X"'
.,� 1 , ��`�,.�`��`� . � \�i k .t �,\�`� �, ^ "�
� \ � �'\ I �ry� � I i . \�'.V��,�� �'P. ��k �
CG '�'� �` � ! ) ' � -
' , � . � F\ ` I\
1 ( /' ��("�� �1H/ � �%� / �..�'/�^. � �S
� � \ 1 ��� �/�!�\'\ I� ���i�:�(� �1 �I� `�(
N I O '.' .�..-,'. r�.� =� 'r►✓S,�lr-11"��='-� f i
� �
�, � , . Sr t��� ��l v Go�lG 2���
ti � -1��� . �y � ,, ��" :� � � SbL:
in �: � �.n`17. r"�� � , �,��
� � .��, '� . D����i�` � � f
' , i
�� i� � r . \ i . i '
� `1 i
. I /
. � �� �����'~ � �, ' "� �s j aF-� = ;�-�.G_b �!�Dy~1��
"��j` I� '� � � I � � � '� �I �I7�:�V I�`�,�� �I 51 1 ��•
I !
-�.�� � �. . � � ;�„ , �s�� . �+r�:_�. �-�
�x-��- 1 �!���. I . i Sr!�-LI 155 � �f��N �-'-
,
,� � , ,, , r�.�.;--,�� , ,
�
� ` ~ //I� �� Ii!;�'�'.�'-LoGK h-�v ����� �'� c
. / � ����' �/��i!J I' �-�.' � ;
. ...' I
i
i/ � '. I � ' i�'��= ° ' ^'
� � �xl���� �I L I�� � �
' � � �� �;< r��r:-,� -a ps� e,��t�� �
� . I/ I �.�p ��r.�'o���, ��oM �.�-�I.
.,� ` f
W � � �' . ..
� - I N � - '
� �" �a 10' � - - �
i �;
us�v� � , ��:: .�. . �- - -��,..- �
.�T � �'`�`'--(�..�° ' . = .�i�S���m.�u�. _ � .� :_ .....
�It2� f--f�?'Y�.i�.� . � _ � , ., �� `` .. �`-''� 1
I � . . � � ,.� • .
. , � -d�: - --I�.o ,
�
-� ;� , , , . , . ; , , ;� , , - �
�/, ` __ �
,
� °'� �' /� , � � � ,�,�'.�,, \ , � � ' C
s� � ��-�-N'f � 1 � �-f , � .��r� �, �^ �.
' �V •
�
u
�y
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Attorney
I�ail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Mollica �
Lori Aker
FROM: R. Thomas Moorhead ��-
t
DATE: October 9, 1995 '
SUBJECT: Pirate Ship Park Lease
Attached is the Pirate Ship Park Lease (original to Lori for Fire Safe) for your_records. Thanks.
RTM/aw ,/
/
C:Unollica.etc
�,s�•RECYCLEDPAPER
�
y
,
. � OR1�iNAL �
► EXEC UTED
PIRATE SHIP PARK LEASE
THIS PIRATE SHIP PARK LEASE (the "Lease") , made effective as
of the lst day of May 1995, is by and between VAIL ASSOCIATES,
INC . , a Colorado corporation ( "VAI") , and TOWN OF VAIL, a
Colorado municipal corporation ( "TOV") .
WHEREAS, VAI is the owner of certain real property on which
the playqround commonly known as the "Pirate Ship Park" ia
located; and
WHEREAS, VAI and TOV desire to enter into this Lease subject
to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows :
1 . TERM. The "Term" of this Lease shall commence on the
date first written above and shall continue perpetually until
terminated as provided in Paragraph 10 hereof.
2 . PREMISES . (a) VAI hereby leases to TOV and TOV
hereby leases from VAI that certain portion of Tract E, Vail
Village Fifth Filing, as more particularly described and
highlighted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference, for use as the Pirate Ship Park
(the "Premises") .
(b) TOV agrees that the Premises are leased to TOV in
"AS IS" condition with no representations by VAI whatsoever as to
the fitness or tenantability of the Premises or otherwise . TOV' s
occupancy of the Premises shall be conclusive evidence as against
TOV that the condition of the Premises were satisfactory to TOV.
. 3 . USE OF PREMISES . (a) TOV shall use the Premises for
the sole purpose of operating a playground available to the
general public.
(b) TOV shall use the Premises in a careful, safe and
proper manner and shall not use or permit the Premises to be used
for any purpose prohibited by any federal, state, county or
municipal laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or codes .
(c) TOV shall not use or suffer or permit all or any
part of Premises to be used in any immoral, illegal, lewd,
objectionable or offensive manner or for any such purpose. TOV
shall neither do nor permit to �be done any act or thing upon the
Premises which shall or might subject VAI to any liability or
responsibility for injury to any person or persons or for damage
o • -
. ,
to property by reason of any business or operation carried on a�,
from or upon the Premises for any reason. �
(d) TOV shall be responsible for and shall pay when
due all expenses relating to the use of the Premises, including
but not limited to all costs, charges and expenses attributable
to the maintenance and repair of the Premises, and TOV' s
equipment and its use .
4 . ALTERATIONS BY TOV. Except for ordinary maintenance
required to maintain the Premises in a first class manner, any
other material alterations, additions or improvements to the
Premises shall only be done with the prior approval of VAI in its
sole discretion; as used herein, any alteration, addition or
improvement costing $5, 000 or more shall be considered a material
alteration, addition or improvement . All alterations shall be
performed in a good and workmanlike manner.
S . QUIET ENJOYMENT. VAI covenants and agrees with TOV
that upon TOV observing and performing all the terms, covenants
and conditions of this Lease on TOV' s part to be observed and
performed, TOV may peaceably and quietly enjoy the Premises .
6 . INSURANCE . At all times during the Term of this Lease,
TOV shall carry and maintain in full force, at TOV' s sole cost
and expense, the following insurance policies with insurance
companies satisfactory to VAI . Such policies shall include a
provision requiring a minimum of 30 days ` notice to VAI of change
or cancellation. All such insurance shall specifically insure
performance by TOV of the indemnity agreement as to liability for
death of or injury to persons and property damage set forth in
Paragraph 8 hereof.
(i) Comprehensive general liability insurance in
an occurrence format, if available, in an amount of $1, 000, 000
per occurrence including the following coverages : contractual
liability, personal injury, premises operations and independent
contractors . VAI shall be named as additional insured as its
interests may appear on this policy.
(ii) Tenants insurance covering all of TOV' s
leasehold and personal property on or upon the Premises in an
amount not less than the full replacement cost without deduction
for full depreciation during the Term of this Lease, together
with insurance against vandalism and malicious mischief.
TOV-pIRT.SH2 —2— September 6, 1995
tu\docs\leases
� . •
' . . .
(iii) Workers Compensation Insurance in accordance
with the provisions of the Workers Compensation Act of the State
of Colorado for all of TOV' s employees who are to be present on
the Premises .
TOV shall provide VAI with certificate (s) of insurance
evidencing the policies listed above upon execution of this
Lease . In the event any of TOV' s operations on the Premises are
subcontracted, TOV shall require the insurance coverages
described above of all such subcontractors .
7 . CONSIDERATION. In consideration of the lease of the
Premises, TOV agrees to pay VAI the sum of ten dollars ($10 . 00)
per year for each year of the Term of the Lease.
8 . INDEMNITY. TOV agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless VAI, its subsidiaries and affiliates, their respective
agents, officers, directors, servants and employees of and from
any and all liability, claims, liens, demands, actions and causes
of action whatsoever arising out of or related to any loss, cost,
damage or injury, including death, of any person or damage to
property of any kind arising in connection with the Premises,
TOV' s operations or the misconduct or negligent acts, errors or
omissions of TOV, its subcontractors or any person directly or
indirectly employed by them, or any or them, while engaged in anv
activity associated with this Lease and/or the Premises, +
including without limitation, liability associated with any
pollution or other contamination, including soil or groundwater
contamination, on, at, around or under the Premises arising as a
result of TOV' s operation of the Premises . TOV' s indemnification
shall include, but is not limited to reasonable attorney' s fees
and costs and any cost associated with an allegation of
noncompliance with any federal, state or local law including,
without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S .C. §§ 9601 et seq. , as
amended, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U. S .C.
6901 et seq. , or any common law.
9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS . TOV warrants that it will comply
with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations
having jurisdiction over the Premises and access thereto. TOV
represents that, although the Improvements and Premises do not -
currently comply with CPSC Guidelines, such matter is not a
material violation of this Section 9, and, in any case, any New
Playground will comply with CPSC Guidelines .
TOV-PIRT.SH2 —3— September 6, 1995
tu\docs\leases
p ..�
10 . TERMINATION AND RELOCATION. (a) Each party shall have
the right to terminate this Lease, with or without cause, by
giving the other party thirty (30) days ' prio 'r written notice of
such termination.
� (b) In the event VAI is the terminating party, VAI
shall be obligated to contribute to the relocation of
Improvements and/or construction of a new playground (the "New
Playground") at a new locat�ion (the "New Location") as described
below.
(i) Under all circumstances, VAI is under no
obligation to choose a New Location that is acceptable to TOV;
provided, however, that the playground portion of the New
Location is comparable to the playground portion of the original
Premises within Vail Village and/or Golden Peak within a
reasonable distance from the original Premises .
(ii) In connection with the relocation of the
Improvements and/or construction of the New Playground, VAI
agrees to contribute an amount equal to fifty percent (50�) of
actual costs incurred by TOV for such relocation and/or
construction, which contribution by VAI shall, in any event, not
� exceed $10, 000 (the "Playground Contribution" ) . TOV shall
promptly provide VAI with any back-up documentation reasonably
requested by VAI in connection with calculating the Playground
Contribution hereunder.
(c) In the event TOV is the terminating party, TOV
shall promptly quit and surrender the Premises to VAI and, at
VAI ' s request, restore the Premises to the same condition
existing prior to TOV' s occupancy of such Premises, as much as is
prac�icable, in good order and first-class condition with all
TOV' s equipment, Improvements and materials removed; any
equipment, Improvements or materials not so removed shall
conclusively be dee�ned to have been abandoned and may be disposed
of by VAI without notice to TOV or any other person and without
obligation to account therefor . TOV shall fully repair any
damage to the Premises occasioned by the removal of any of TOV' s
equipment, Improvements and/or materials . In addition, TOV shall
perform or cause to be performed environmental remediation with
regard to any contamination of the Premises . ,
TOV-PIRT.SH2 —4— September 6, 1995
tu\docs\leases
� • •
C ,.
11 . HOLDOVER. If TOV shall, remain or continue to be in
possession of the Premises or any part thereof after the end of
the Term of this Lease, at VAI ' s option, TOV shall be deemed to
be illegally retaining possession or shall be deemed to be a
month-to-month tenant of such Premises on all the terms and
conditions of this Lease except that rent sha�l be an amount
equal to $200 . 00 per day. Nothinq herein contained shall be
construed to limit VAI ' s right to obtain possession of the
Premises upon termination of this .Lease by unlawful detainer
proceedings or otherwise in the event that VAI does not exercise
its option to treat the continued possession by TOV as a
month-to-month tenancy. �
12 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. TOV shall not assign,
convey, mortgage, hypothecate or encumber this Lease or any
interest herein or sublet all or any part of the Premises, or
suffer or permit the Premises or any part thereof to be used by
others (any and all of which hereinafter shall be referred to as �
a "transfer") , without the prior written consent of VAI in each
instance. Any attempted transfer without VAI ' s prior written
consent shall be void and shall confer no rights upon any third
person. Subject to the foreqoing, the terms, covenants and
conditions contained in this Lease shall bind and inure to the
benefit of TOV' s and VAI ' s respective successors and assigns .
13 . NOTICES . Any bill, statement, notice, demand or
communication which either party may desire or be required to
give to the other party shall be in writing and shall be deemed
sufficiently given or rendered if delivered personally or sent by
certified or registered United States mail, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows :
If to VAI : Vail Associates, Inc.
P. 0. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
Attn: President
cc: Legal Dept. Compliance Officer
If to TOV: Town of Vail
75 South Frontaqe Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Attention: Town Manager
cc: Town Attorney
The time of rendition of such bill or statement and of the giving
of such notice, demand or communication shall be deemed to be the
time when it is personally delivered or mailed. Either party
, TOV-pIRT.SH2 —�J— September 6, 1995
tu\docs\leases
e
� �
. /
shall have the right to designate in writing, served as provided
above, a different address to which any notice, demand or
communication is to be mailed.
14 . ENTIRE AGREEMENT. VAI, TOV and their respective agents
have made no representations, warranties, agreements or promises
with respect to this Lease, except such as are expressed herein.
The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein, and
there are no promises, agreements, representations, warranties,
conditions or understandings, either oral or written between
�hem, other than as are herein set forth.
15 . MISCELLANEOUS . (a) If any clause or provision of this
Lease shall be held to be invalid in whole or in part, then the
remaining clauses and provisions, or portions thereof, shall
nevertheless be and remain in full force and effect .
(b) No amendment, alteration, modification of or
addition to this Lease shall be valid or binding unless expressed
in writing and signed by the parties to be bound thereby.
(c) The captions of each section are added as a matter
of convenience only and shall be considered of no effect in the
construction of any provision of this Lease .
(d) If any party hereto shall bring any suit or action
against another for relief, declaratory or otherwise, arising out
of this Lease, the prevailing party shall have and recover
against the other party, in addition to all court costs and
disbursements, such sum as the Court may adjudqe to be reasonable
attorneys ' fees .
(e) This Lease shall be governed by and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado .
(f) Any and all warranties, provisions, rights and -
obligations of the parties herein described and agreed to be
performed subsequent to the termination of this Lease shall
survive the termination of this Lease .
TOV-PIRT.SH2 —6— September 6, 1995
tU\docs\leases
J . •
� �
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Lease as of the respective dates set forth below to become
effective as of the date first written above .'
VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. TOWN OF VAIL
�
By: gy:
Title : �- Title:
/aWr� i'Vlana c�/I
Date: �0 " -3 ' �' � Date: q-is —�S
TOV-PIRT.SH2 —7— September 6, 1995
tu\docs\leases
� •
�
;
EXHIBIT A
(Attached to and forming a part of
the Lease Agreement by and
between Vail Associates, Inc.
and Town of Vail,
dated May l, 1995. )
MAP REFLECTING THE PREMISES COMMONLY KNOWN AS
PIRATE SHIP PARK
(Attached)
A-1
, ; \� o�o �
� � � �
.
� 8?'..i6'�C'
G '
,, o ,
,
�P . \ �°� �\
,00�s ��o- - - -... LOT d, E
� . ,_ _,���.�_.,, ��, VAIL VI
O� �
�� � �� FlRST
�P �uMos-�� , �
GE - e_��.- � �
'� � ����1����� �s�.
IG s �? �
�G� ��' � °� ��
��, � LOT c �� �- _ �
�.�� �� �
� - ;z.�� �,
' 92'3°,'00" � GEIEC. 60X ;;` \�
�
,�, LOT b �� ��' � � FNC. P!N & �A� �.5. 2�
� ' � I
� \ �'" � ,Zo•,o'oo°
1 �
LO T Cl Gj� . � TE�.RISER-�'� CATV. R
' � - � •�
� 10�''_ - , , —�-
� _ : - E/ �� S(GN POST ��'�'�
150'01'00" _ ELEC. TR�
=.'?6s.00'100.00' �ECK _ - - �� �
/ `NALL \
� - _ �- _ � /' MILL ��
. _. . . � . . • .
� - �- . . . .. , \
LIGHT POLE ,- / coNC. CREEK ASPHAL7 �
BIKE PATH � �
� 0 � �` E!EC. M.H. j� AIRS (TYP.) �� `.
i� `
� ��- S�WE� M.y. � ,� � TR A C T E ��
� ,
; a
� ' o VAI L VI LLAGE �
''��. M.!�. - ` PiRar
i l J_. N� ° RK �� �FI FTH FI LI N G �
�-� � 3.835 AC.
I r•' ����I' � � � 'rND. PIN & �
` � FLA� wALK CAF �S. 16827 �
� W00� `N "�
' � ' TY �hScMEN � 161'2
APPROX.SE`�/ER LINE�1 � �+ EL'�C. Sw!TCH '
� BOX
N ,
I ' �. � 6 ��e�� Z5�'� PREMISES LEASED UNOER
I , PIRATE SNIP PARK LEASE
wArE� �+.H. 1 '
�
`, aa•¢o'oo' �� t
�; '1 LO T 2 '�
t
--� X ` '� 1
� ;sPU r K�,r_ =�:N�� .
( '� �v Y�
�� � LO T 1
,
. �, ,,
�4 l
;� 1� EXHIBIT A
� � ` ;'�
VISTA �
� �
�
�
��
�y .
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Attorney
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157
y�,�„--, ---
�� � '�'�' J� �/
4a�
September 5, 1995
S E P 5 1995
���U y �O�n�, n��. �EPT
TamaraUnderwood, Esquire -
Legal Department
Vail Associates, Inc.
Post Office Box 7
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Tamara: �
I have reviewed the proposed red-lined copy of the Pirate Ship Park Lease. It's terms are acceptable.
If you send to me two copies for execution, I will return a fully executed copy to you.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. As always, it has been a pleasure working with you.
Very truly urs,
" f �, I�� 'AM1
� � t - �
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RTM/aw
xc: Robert W. McLaurin
Mike Mollica /
Todd Oppenheimer
��•RECYCLED PAPER
r
,. �. • .
� �.
. i
Vail �issociates, Inc.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� �
September 20. 1995
Mr. Tom Moorhead
� Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
West Vail, CO 81658
Dear Mr. Moorhead:
Enclosed please find the Quit Claim Deed for Tract H, Vail Village Fifth Filing, commonly
known as a portion of Mill Creek Stream. ��n�
�
Please record the Quit Claim Deed and send a copy of the recorde eed ty: 1
� (� �
Gerry Arnold �
Vail Associates, Inc. �� � o
PO Box 7 O
Vail Colorado 81658 �
Owners and Opera[ors o/ • �
Vail,Beaver Creek Resort
andArrowheadMoun[ain If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 845-2658.
With regards,
Gerry Arnold
Paralegal
��, -
�
1999 N'o�io a�nne
SCI lHAN110\SHIIf
Y�II�It�1'EICIFf[
�o�o� ,o o PO Box 7.Vail,Colorado.81658.phone 303 476 5601 ��
'�__�,� y�' --
:, � , . �
573C59 B-677 P-47 �/28/95 01 : 43P PG 1 OF 4� REC DOC �-
Sara J. Fisher Eagle County Clerk & Recorder 21 . 00
�
QUIT CLAIM DEED �� MQO r/t eCC�(�
THIS DEED, Made this _� day of� lgg�
between THE VAIL CORPORATION, doing busi ss as Vail Associates,
Inc. , a corporation duly organized and e isting under and by virtue
of the laws of the State of Colorado, grantor, and TOWN OF VAIL, a
municipal corporation duly organized and existing under and by
� virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado, grantee, whose legal
address is 75 South Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado 81657,
WITNESS, That, the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS ($10 . 00) , the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, has remised, released, sold and QUIT CLAIMED,
and by these presents does remise, release, sell and QUIT CLAIM
unto the grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all the
right, title, interest, claim and demand which the grantor has in
and to the real property, together with improvements, if any,
situate, lying and being in the County of Eagle and State of
Colorado, described as follows:
Tract H, Vail Village Fifth Filing, according to the map recorded
�, on April 25, 1995 in Book 665� at Page 983 in the records of the
�� Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder
�
y� EXCEPT RESERVING AND SIIBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON
EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN .
also known by street and number as : vacant land
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the
appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging, or in anywise
thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest
and claim whatsoever, of the grantor, either in law or equity, to
the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the grantee, its
successors and assigns forever.
. �
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, . The grantor has caused its corporate name to C';
be hereunto subscribed by its Sr. Vice President, and its «1
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, attested by its �
Assistant Secretary, the day and year first above written. �
ATTEST: THE VAIL CORPOR.ATION
a Colorado corpor io
_ By:
SIST SECRETARY SR. VI�CE PRESIDENT
� 1
. . � � �
. �
STATE OF COLORADO }
}ss. �
COUNTY OF EAGLE }
The for going instrument was acknowledged before me this 3�'�
day of �{- , 199 5, by James S. Mandel as Sr. Vice
President, and Gerry Arnold as Assistant Secretary of The Vail
. Corporation, a Colorado corporation, on behalf of such .corporation.
� My commission expires 3`�,3� 199� .
— ,
Witness my hand and official seal .
, �/ ' � �
�� �
. ary Public
.. _
�`2
��
�
�
�
-�
573059 B-677 P-47 09/28/95 01 : 43P PG 2 OF 4
s ^ . �
EXHIBIT A �
(ATTACHED TO AND FORMING PART OF QU T CLAI DEE/�R,pM THE VAIL
CORPORATION TO TOWN OF VAIL DATED j AS USED
HEREIN "PREMISES" SHALL MEAN THAT REAL P PERTY ESCRIBED IN THE
DEED. )
RESTRICTIONS
1. After July 1, 1996, the Premises are restricted to the
following uses: public pedestrian access (including sidewalks,
benches, landscaping elements, snowmelt and irrigation systems,
retaining walls and other improvements consistent with such use) ;
utilities; vehicles used in the construction, repair, replacement,
and maintenance of utilities and improvments contained or to be
con�ained within the Premises and adjacent Lot c, Block 2, Vail
Village First Filing with the prior approval of the Town of Vail in
its sole discretion; drainage; recreation activities (including but
not limited to nordic and alpine skiing and bicycling) ; and signage
relating to ski area operations and mountain activities .
2 . Parking is strictly prohibited on the Premises.
3 . The Premises shall not be conveyed or transferred to another
party without the express written consent of The Vail Corporation.
4 . The Vail Corporation will not be liable for any damage to land
or improvements within the Premises resulting from high waters of
Mill Creek.
5 . The Vail Corporation, for itself, its successors and assigns,
hereby reserves a perpetual easement on, over, under, across, above �
and through the Premises for the uses set forth in Paragraph 1 r;
above. The Vail Corporation, the Town of Vail and any public �
utility company shall not be responsible or liable for damage to or •�
loss of any improvements existing on the Premises caused by or a
arising from exercise of easement rights reserved or set forth in
this Exhibit A. '
6. In the event that the Town of Vail desires to approve and does
approve any type of development which is not consistent with the
use restrictions set forth in Paragraph 1 above, the ownership of
the Premises will automatically revert to The Vail Corporation and
the Town of Vail will execute such documents as necessary or
desirable to effect and record such reversion in which event The
Vail Corporation will dedicate to the Town of Vail another parcel
of land within the Town of Vail limits equal in size to the
Premises .
573059 B-fi77 P-47 p9/2g/95 01 : 43P PG 3 OF 4
. • .
��
,f
REVERSION
If the Town of Vail does not comply with all the restrictions
set forth in this Exhibit A, and, upon written notice from The Vail
Corporation of a violation of restriction, and, after 30 days the
Town of Vail does not correct such violation, then the ownership of
the Premises will automatically revert to The Vail Corporation and
the Town of Vail will execute such documents as necessary or
desirable to effect and record such reversion. �
The Restrictions set forth in this Exhibit A shall be binding on
the successors and assigns of The Vail Corporation and the Town of
Vail .
..
�
:�
��
. �
. -:�5
573059 B-677 P-47 09/28/g5 01 : 43P PG 4 OF 4
.�1 J� . �
Printed by Mike Mollica S/0' 5 11:59am �
----------- ----- - - --- -------- - - - - - - - - - -
From: Mike Mollica
To: Bob McLaurin
Subject: fwd: Golden PeaK House
--------------------- - - - - ----------- - - -
===NOTE====------=====8/09/95=11:04am==
CC: Susan Connelly, Tom Moorhead
• • . . . . • • - - . . . • • - - - . . . • • • - • - - - • • • - - . . . . .
The final approved Ordinance for the
Golden PeaK House does not require the
Town, or the developer, to create a new
view corridor_ However, it does
require the developer to "cooperate"
with the TOV should we desire to modify
the existing view corridor.
S would suggest we wait until the
entire roof atructure and builing
siding has been completed, and then
initiate a view corridor amendment_
This will taKe another couple of
months.
Tom, we need to finalize the GPH
agreements with VA, etc. . any progess??
This should be done before TCO
(Nov/Dec) .
Fwd=by:=TOm=MOOrhead==8/07/95=11:32am==
Fwd to: MiKe Mollica
CC= Bob McLaurin. Susan Connelly
" " . . . . " ' _ • " " " " " " ' _ " " " _ " " '
All terms to agreements have been
agreed upon for some time_ I have a �
meeting with VA on Friday and will
coordinate execution. ThanKs for the
info.
------- ---- - --- -- - - - ------ - - - -- -- --- ---
Page: 1
Printed by Mike Mollica 6/12,,�; 11:28am �
------ - -- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -
From: MiKe Mollica
To: Tom Moorhead
Subject: fwd: Golden Peak House
---------------- ----------- - - - - - --- ----
===NOTE====------=====6/08/95=11:07am==
Do you know if the following documents
have been executed and recorded at the
County-
*Declaration of Public Pedestrian
Access;
*Quit Claim Deed for Tract H; � .
*Pirate Ship Park Lease;
i£ the answer is yes, would you please
provide me with copies for our planning
files?
ThanKs. . .
Fwd=by:=TOm=MOOrhead==6/11/95=11:18am==
Fwd to: MiKe Mollica
- • - - - - . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mike, the dedication of pedestrian
access is completed but not yet filed.
The Quit Claim Deed restrictions are
still being discussed with Gerri
Arnold. We are examining the
restrictions in light of the recent
revelation that Serrano's
redevelopement will not be going this
summer_ Finally, 1 have sent some
final clarifications to VA regarding
the Pirateship Park. I hope to have
that final by the end of this week.
IP you ].ive on grass and bugs for one
weeK you too can be an� American Hero! �
- ----- ------------ -- - - - - --- - - - - - - ----- -
Page: 1
.� •t ' �
�
,�
�
u
�y
TUWN OF vA1L
75 South Frontage Road Office of Town Attorney
vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2107/FAX 303-479-2157
MEMORANDUM
%
TO: �° Mike Mollica
FROM: R. Thomas Moorhead,��� � ,j���'�
DATE: May 3, 1995
RE: Pirate Ship Park Lease Agreement
Mike, on May 3, Todd O. and I met with Tamara Underwood, attorney for Vaif Associates,
regarding finalizing the Pirate Ship Park Lease Agreement.
A question was raised as to the amount of bond that has ��en required of ;re� Golden Peak
House developer for improvements in the area south of ihe bu;l�ing that would include the Pirate
Ship Park and all of the open space up to the Vista Bahn. I understand �hat there are two
irrigation systems in that area. One is maintained by the To�rin ar�d the other ;s m�intained by
Vail Associates. Also, we were curious as to whether or not #�+� Goloen Peak Ho�se is required
to improve or replace the bike path and other faatures that will �e aestroyed durirg their staging
process.
In regard to the lease agreement itself, there was discussion of enlarging the area oT the ground
lease to be divided by natural boundaries such as the stream tract on the east and a property
dividing line on tne west. In regard to your comment concerning taxes, I do not beliave that once
the property is leased to us and is used for a municipal or governmental purpase ihai it should
be subject to county taxes. I will check with Allen Black in regard to that issue.
We discussed at some length the issues concerning relocation of the park and the costs that
would be incurred to do so. This is somewhat problematic b2cause ihe park as it presently exists
has no value when considering relocation. The timbers are 2� years oid and no utiiify remaining
in them.
I was curious as to whether our records ref�ect, or whether we know, who i�uili tFe original
playground. Todd believes that it was built by Vail Associates and that we ass�med ;?-�aintenance
of the facility. If you would have any records to reflect who built the facility that wo�ld be very
helpful.
-, �,,�. • •
f , ,�
Tamara Underwood appears willing to continue to move forward on this issue so that it can be
resolved in a fashion that is timely in relation to the issuing of the building permit. What is the
present anticipated date for issuing the building permit? I'd appreciate your keeping me advised
so that we can be on track to have all necessary agreements entered into.
I had further discussions yesterday with Gerri Arnold in regard to the quit claim deed for the
stream tract and that seems to be pretty much on target.
In regard to the stream tract, do you remember whether or not the property conveyed to us
includes any property to the east of the stream adjacent to Christiania.
Keep smiling.
RTM/aw ' � (�����
xc: Todd Oppenheimer
c:�rno��lca.mem
• �
MEMORANDUM
To: R. Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
From: Mike Mollica,Assistant Director of Planning ��
Date: May 1, 1995
RE: Vail Associates Deed To TOV For Tract H And Lease Agreement For Pirate Ship Park
And Lionshead Tot Lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. VA Deed to TOV for Mill Creek Stream Tract
I agree completely with the concerns you have raised regarding Paragraph 1, Paragraph 5
and Paragraph 6. Have these concems been passed on to VA?
I have a concem allowing a perpetual easement for the use of maintenance vehicles nn,
over,under and across the property. The Town should not be encouraging any type of
vehicular activity on this properiy and I would recommend that we strike"maintenance
vehicles" from Paragraph 1. Any thoughts?
II. Playground Lease
Paragraph 3,D suggests that the TOV agree to pay all property taxes for the areas in
question. Is this appropriate?
Has Todd Oppenheimer reviewed the termination and relocation paragraph of the lease
agreement? Is thirty days prior written notice adequate?
On another matter, are you in receipt of the declaration of public pedestrian access across
Lot C? If so, can you please provide a copy to me. Thanks.
f:everyone/mike/memo/moorhead 51
��� � • .
1
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B and C
PROPs.RTY Block 2, Vail Village First Filing pROJECT Golden Peak House
DAT� November 27, 1995 Vail� COlorado
TOTAI. PARKING FEE $ 107.057.86
In installments after date, for value received, I promise to pay �
to the order of the Town of Vail at the Office of the Finance
Director, Nunicip�l Building, Vail, Colorado,
One hundred seven thousand fifty seven and 86/100------------------ Do113rS
Total Parking Fee
Down Payment $ 23,282* with interest of ten percent per annum
on the unpaid balance, payable in yearly installments as follows :
Firs� installment of $25,148.47 due and payable on 5/10/96
Second installment of $27,018.90 due and payable on 5/10/97
Third installment of 527,018.90 due and payable on 5/10/98
Fourth installmen�, of 527,018.90 due and payable on 5/10/99 .
It is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared
due rereunder, tne principal and accrued interest thereon shall
draw interest at the rate o� 18 percent per annum, and that
failure to make any payment of principal or interest when due or
any default under any encum.branc� or agreement securing this note
shall cause the whole note to become due at once, or the interest
to be counted as principlal, at the option of the holder of the
note. The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive
present;�ent for payment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of
protest, and agree to any extension of time of payment and
partial payments before, at, or after maturity, and if this note
or interest thereon is no� paid when due, or suit is brought,
agree to pay all reasonable costs of collection, including
reasonable attorr.ey' s fees .
.
�� � �
gy: Clark S. Willi gham, GPH Partners, Ltd.
One Turtle r ek Village, Suite 606, Dallas, TX 75219-4471
- te• rz z s�
,•� GC,�'� ��� ��' S
y" C fUl2l`Y!��c� �'"� i� � `�/�� �7
* Paid 5/95 based on higher original parking ssessment. Difference subtracted
from first installment.
� � �
�
November 21, 1995 _
Golden Peak House -Major SDD Amendment
Revised parking pay-in-lieu calculations:
Parldn},Sn�
1. Combine AU#310 with DU#308 = -0.620
2. Combine AU#307 with DU#303/305 = -0.688 -
3. Enclose deck of DU#302 = No change
4. Enclose deck of DU#304 = I�o chan�e
5. Convert 65.9 square feet of common
area to commercial = �-0.21 7
�_0883 surplus
I3.545 - Previously required
- 1.0883 - SDD Amendment
12_4567
x $8.594.40
$107,057.86
f:�everyone�m�lcelgpeal�ey.n21
' TD�S�. MAY 08._'95_ 04�07PM HYD�, CONSTRUCTION 303 825 1313 �Ay 1 �95 15 : 1H NDFU�6 � ,�a
..� , _� ,
�i, • •
r
i
�
w
` 278� tianso�i Ranch RoadlY,ot� A, B and C,�
� P�tOF$RTY B1ock:�2� Vai1 Vili�e Fir�t PiZing.pAQ�gCT Go,lden Peak House
.�,
"� »AT� May 6�,�_ Vaii, Colorada '
r TOTAL Ph�CI?TG p�S $ 116,411.14
� ,
� In installments aftsr dats, for value z�ceived, z promise to pay
�' 'Cc the order of the Tawn oP Vail at th� Ortic� of the Financ�
' D�x�CtOr, :Nutsicipal Huilding, Va��, Calorado, ,
r
r
e ODiE HUNDRSD BiXT� N T80UB _FCZTR Ht�DRBD B,LEV��D ik/idO�Dollars
+ 'l�OLSl i'BIJC 39� A� '
i
;. �h Dawr, Payra�nt S Z �00 with intere�t ot ten percent per annum
� on �he unpaid ba ance, payable in yearly i�nstalzraents a� follQws;
,,
� First installment ot �29.3�9,5Z due 8nd p�yable on �Y,�g��g�,
'� Second iastallment of 429,379.SZ due and payab2e on �� ��gg� ,
�,
L �
� Third installfient of SZ�,379.52 due ar�d payabla on �y 10• , g� 96 , '
J
!�
" Fovrth �n�tallment o� 82�,�7�,5a du� a�d payable cn � IQ, 9s
, � ,
..�.�-
It is aqreed that if this note is not paid wr.�n dua or d�clared
� due heraundaz, the prircipal �and accrued in�erest th�zeon ahall
� draw interest at the ra�e o� 18 percer�t per ar,nUm, and that
fail�Y•e to m�k� any payment oP, principal or intere�t when due or
;r any d�fault under �ny enavmbrance or agr�8merit se�ur�nq thi� note
shall caus� the whole notg �o become due at onc�, o� the interest
, �o be counted a� principial, a� the opti'on o�' the lzo�.der of the
, note. The m�kers and endorsez� hereof s�verally .waive
. pr��entment fpr paymenC, prote�t, ri4tiice on npnpayment and o!
; proti��t, ar,d agree ta any ex�ension ot tima o� payment and
partfai p�ymant5 before, at, o� a�ter maturity, �nd if this note
or i�nterest thezeon i� no� paict when due, or su�t is brouqht,
aqree ta pay �11 re�sonable co�ts o! coliection, includSnq
reasonabin attorney' s fe�s . ' �
gY � Clark S. Wi1 h�m, GPK Partnera, �.td.
one �t t7,e C k �17.J.�ga, Buite b06, �allaer 1'x� 7Sa19-447I
Da�� : S�/9S—
�.._
y . . _., , ., ._ _ _ .
, �.;. . -
.is
, . ,
R' , q , , - j ,�
' � .�
' L/� . .
_.�—_ _ --- w:��.�.e.�—__.__-_.----_._�_._.__ __.- --... _ - --- ,
� .r-.�--.,-.a..,,. �,.o.._.._.e,..�.,�.... ,..s,.�,��:�_.—:-.=�:,- ,,..�:�.�.� �-,?::.,;,•�.s;:=
�..._. .._ _.__ . .._._ .�.. .
=� - -- -- - - �.
`" TnWN(>F VAIL �ir;cr:�r-rno. �� -
s.: -
qa. "
ur:rnu rnu�.n r or•cu�in�unrrv ur:�•et,orntE:nr ;r
� �
�: — � - Q �
' �s. NAMF.
� �:
� AUllRF.SS_ ' llATE �� / �/ �
. -� � �, �°,� �° - .
�. =
� FiIOJF,CT r � �� �
. ; ' CIIF.I'IiFMADI:PAVA0I,BTATO\VNONVAI/, ,Y��i
--- - . _.... . . . . . -�
������ -,�_. _"—'__����-----�__ a; L.+�-�?-���a�
--� ���--�„"= �,�
��� �=-��-�:�i��d�u����t i��a�,ix�-�r�����,�u�b-��;,���y,��<«,���;�,a�s�,��ri�e��r��.����������: 3 8 5 6 4 �
�� ���
MECHANICS LIEN WAIVER ����� �A�� ��
i By endorsing this check, payee waives and releases any 17 VAIL ROAD ,
. mechanic's lien nghts which payee may have with respect to valL,Co ate57 ��
I work erlormed or materials fumished b a ee tor which �
I payment is made by this check. y P Y O S/O 9/9 S i
I r
-
�
I, PAYTOTHETOWN OF VAIL - *****23,282 . 00�
' ORDER OF �'
Twenty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eighty-Two and 00/100 ***************DOLLARS 4.
�
�
TOWN OF VAIL �
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE RD CONS UCTION ACCOUNT =
VAIL, CO 81657
THI STRU NT SHALL BE VOID AND �
NON-NEG IABL 18 DAYS AFTER DATE OF ISSUANCE. �!
NOTICE TO CUSTOMER �1,
The purc�ase ot an Indemnity Bontl will be reQuired before any
otlidal check ol this bank will be replacetl or retuntled in the event
it is bst,misplacetl or s�olen. --_ _—_ �yp �I�������
MEMO n�0 3 8 5 6 4�i' �: L 0 2 L 0 � 5 L 9�: 2 2 9 0 2 0 0 3 9 5 n' UTHORIZED SIGNATURE �
� - - - -- --_ _- =,- ---
...
�.�__�...�.______� --.---�----__�_--__�._�__��__. _�._W __ _____.�__�y� ----=- -_ _ --__-
�.,
1,. .. ��� �,uuvb�►�L �n,���DLG(rr,4"/o (J�n�C)
�'� * Ol 0000 41Q10 TA\AI3LE(ni 4"/� ('f0\VN) -
� O1 00�0 42371 13UI1_DINCi INVI;SI'I(;/�TION -"
..� � . OTIiI:K �.}
:: ,:.
� . . i'r,C APPLi A'1'ION FGL;S , . ,_ ,Y
� Ol O000 4133O nDDITIONnL GItHn "250" ,.�200.t)0 ��
� --
� 01 0000 41330 CONDITIONnL USI's PI;IZMIT �<<��•��� '_
y Ol 0000 4 1 330 liXTIsItIOR nLTl:lin'I'ION [Li;SS '('I InN 100 S .F'1'.] �200.U0 s;,:
°, O1 0000 41330 I?XTI;RIOIt nLT'I:RnTION [titOltl;TI InN 100 SQ.I��'.J S+SOO.OU =.°�
01 0000 41330 SPI:Cl/�L nl;Vi?LUP�II:NT DI�'I�RICT [NI:W] �1,SU0.00 ��
;� O10U0041330 SPI;CIALI)I:VI:LOI'MI:N'fDIS'1'(tICT [Mn.IOR nMI;ND $I,000.00 `
: 01 000O 41330 SPI;CIAL �I;VI;LOPMI:NI'DIS'I�RICT [MINOIt AMI;ND] � �200.00 —
;; O1 0000 4133U SUf3QIVISION
=� 01 0000 41330 VnRInNCI: • $250A0 ;:�
r�: O1 0000 41330 lONING CODIS�11��il;NDM1;N"1'S $250.00 L
;< 01 OOOQ 41330 RI;-ZONINCi $200.00 ;�;
" O"I'1 I I;R '
��.
�L UTIII:K -
TOTA L. "':�:
;.: y�
:4 `�
Y3i >�
�CUMMGNTS:
;x
J.. . �
_ �T
�
i�'
:°i
y; -��
�' C�$�j 1 1 CK.p( 1 rl.��-1 RLC.IIY. i�'
�i'r
. •. . � �
. ' L%/�
. __ _ . .., �
.,. .__._.__. _.. ._ .._- . . ...�`:�� .:_,- .. -.:,,,e.a;�:.....,�:.�;;c.-� ����
rv. --..?�...'� `. •,.,.'.._. . �:. . . �,� �.:
. . . _ ._ .�.
;''�
�•
,�: :��
:�;: TOWN OF VnIL i:�cru•rNO. �� �.,.
'+� ;:;,
+�e PN:1'AN'I'DIF.N"P UN'COi�IAfUNI"1'Y Ut:vw►.<�rmkrrr �.,%
�'�
� rvnn�N: —�— �
�------ Q *�
� . % S� �
� AUDItF,SS_ — -- llA7'E ��/ / �,
�� �.��.� •�-' � �° �
� PIdOJF,(,T � "
r � �� �
CIIF.I'KF MADM:PAYAISI.F.'PO TOWN OR VAII. �}i
�� .:,ct ACCbUN'P NU. �.,F..: ,:.<,.:.,,., ... �7.1�b1 :, .. -.;.• ,, :,'NO. .:,.>7'AX. :_,:, CO3'1'1�A. �-..,-Tt)TAL ,,, `�!
� ��
�4
"� 01 OOOQ 41540 70NING AND nDDIZIiSS MnPS R5.00 * �«
;4. 01 0000 42415 UMFOKM BUILDING CODli $54A0 * -r�
�' 01 0000 42415 UNIIY)RM PLUM13fNG CODI� 9;39.00 * -�=�
'" 01 0000 42415 UNIFORM MIiC(InNICnL COI)I; $37.00 *
t_ :�'
;;�: 01 0000 42415 UNIFORlvl FIKI;COnli $36.00 * ��L
;rt 01 OOOU 42415 PIATIONAL I?Ll?CTRI�AI.C0171i $37.00 * a,
'�'' 01 0000 42415 OTIIL'K CODI; l;OOKS * '��
nt;
; O1 000041545 13LU1; PRINTS (MYLnRS) $7.00 * ;�
;,C 01 0000 42412 XI;ROX COPII;S • 4�0.25 * -�'�y{`��
�'': �k 5�
� o� o00o aza i z S'I'U 1)I I;S
'� 01 000042�12 TOVFI;I;SCOMPUTIsR PROGR/1M $5.00 * rt"
�;;i' Ol 0000 42371 PI?NnLTY I�I?1?S/RL'-INSPIsC"1'IONS `';`
.�, 01 0000 41332 PLAN RI:VII;W RI;C111?CK Fl:li �40 PIiR I IR. r"`
�•.
:� 01 0000 42332 OHI� lIOUIZS INSPI;CTION I�I�,I:S :r
'� 01 0000 41412 CONTRAC'TORS LICI'.NSI:S I�I;I:S '�,�'!
;� (1I 0000 41413 SIGN nPf'L(C:AT'lON FI:I; �t;20.00 �r�`-
�r O1 0000 41413 Af)DITIONAL SIGNnGI? I�I:I? [51.011 I'I�,R SQ.I�'1'.] �;
'{ O1 0O00 42440 VTC/�KT I'IZO.II:C'T f)ONn'1'IUN "
`��
� 01 0000 41331 PIZI: PnID DIiSiGN KI'sVlliW 13OnRD I�I:Ii ;;�
01 0000 42371 INVIiSTIGATION l�I:I: IiUILDING �
+z 31 O!)OU 451 10 TOV PnRKING HUND ��:
t; 01 0000 22027 TOV N1;WSPAPI;R f)ISPI?NSI;R I�UND �
�° * Ol OOU11 21112 7'AXA[3L1;(rr)4% (tiTA'1`L) �i"
?;'� * 01 011110 41010 TA\AI3LE(n)4"%� ('1'01'VN) �;
;-;:—
,:;; Ol oo�n 4237I 13UII.nINCi INVI;S�'IGnTION "'�
��; � . O1'I11iR �— ,;,�
�` i'H, APPL CA'I'10 [�EI;S • : . . ��:
� (11 0000 d133� /1DD1'fIUNAL GRFn "250" $200.00 �'
� Ol 0000 41330 CONDITIONnL USI:PIiRMIT $200.00 �,'�
� O1 0000 41330 l:XT1;RIOR nLTI:R/�"I'lON [LI;SS "1'11nN 100 SQ.FT.] 5�200.00 �
�` Ol 0000 4 1 330 LXTI:RIOIt nLT'L'(ZATION [MOKIi TI InN_100 SQ.FT.] 9�500.00 �
�` 01 U00041330 SPI?CInL DI:VI;LOPMI:N"I'DIS'1'RICT [M�,W] $1,500.00 �i:•,
'� 01 0000 41330 SPI:CInL DI;VI:LOPMI;N"I'DfSTftiCT [MA.IOR /1M1?ND] $I,0O0.00 F�'
� Ol 0000 4 1 330 S('I;CIAL D1sVl;LOPNiI:NT DIS'fIZICT [MINOR nMI;ND] $20O.00 ';�:
t" 01000041330 SU13b(VISfON �
:,�s ;;;�
: 01 0000 41330 VARInNCI's R250.00 ;;-i;
��; 01 0000 41330 70NING CODI;�1M1?NDMIiN'I'S $250A0 +�t
:; 01 0000 41330 RI;-ZONING $200.00 ��
� O"1'1 I I;R '"j
�� OTIIGR
�' TOTnL. �
:�
�
:� ��
` COMMGNTS: '�
��
�. rw
r�o� y
]� iN�
!
�
� CASII !� 1 CK.N�� 1 j`�.�i_� RCC.DY. Y,
qpc 1
�:.
, + _ • `
� '
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B and C,
PROPERTY Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.PROJECT Golden Peak House
DATE May 8, 1995 Vail, Colorado �
TOTAL PARKING FEE $ 116,411 .14
In installments after date, for value received, I promise to pay
to the order of the Town of Vail at the Office of the Finance
Director, Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado,
ONE HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN AND 14/100-------D ollars /
Total Parking Fee
� ,,\4y
� Down Payment $ 23,282.00 with interest of ten percent per annum �`
on the unpaid balance, payable in yearly installments as follows :
First installment of $29,379.52 due and payable on Mav 10, 1996 .
Second installment of $29,379.52 due and payable on Mav 10, 1997 .
Third installment of $29,379.52 due and payable on Mav 10, 1998 -
Fourth installment of $29,379.52 due and payable on May 10. 1999 •
It is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared
due hereunder, the principal and accrued interest thereon shall
draw interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum, and that
failure to make any payment of principal or interest when due or
any default under any encumbrance or agreement securing this note
shall cause the whole note to become due at once, or the interest
to be counted as principlal, at the option of the holder of the
note . The makers and endorsers hereof severally waive
presentment for payment, protest, notice on nonpayment and of
protest, and agree to any extension of time of payment and
partial payments before, at, or after maturity, and if this note
or interest thereon is not paid when due, or suit is brought,
agree to pay all reasonable costs of collection, including
reasonable attorney' s fees .
By= Clark S. Willingham, GPH Partners, Ltd.
One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606, Dallas, Tx. 75219-4471
Date :
By.
- • •
. _
. �
M�y
TOWN OF VAIL �
7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Community Development
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138/479-2139
� `
� q�
�
�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FAX PHONE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
I
TO: i ��"1
COMPANY NAME: .s�i�t-L`�/ ��--�
FAX PHONE NUMBER: ' ✓�� r � � ��� �
FROM: � r �t
DATE: R� TIME: � ' S� �� N\ °
# OF PAGES IN DOCUMENT(S) (NOT INCLUDING COVER SHEET): �
RESPONSE REQU,.�ED?
� ,
SENT BY:
TOWN OF VAIL FA PHONE NUMBER: (303) 479-2452
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PHONE NUMBER: (303) 479-2138
SPECIAL NOTES: �� ,
w`Q-
� �u ��v�h � m��j( rh�cS�1" L� � d �_=
� � , �- � .
� �� � �
�,,,�. `,Ss� � b�.►1 d��, , � r,-, ��r- . �� . n
� _ . . � r� � 0 VlJ 1 n a--C
��� �j,�\� �. °� �-a�v� h�w. S5r
�
� U_S`��"P . ----�'��c- �ou �
'M ' �
� •
f, r
�
. '
�►�►eK�N� An�(ys%s %
- .�,
Q 0����e = 5 3 z.so R D, 2 ! 2
� f�es1�e�-�;�j = = 28', 30�
Q ����:� � = 14, 2�7��ac� = ��, 2��
D I\eS��a�►c�►'� = �,�}!� ¢''�r 518/2 � 5 � � ��L
i�.,_-____1 _ _
c' (�`�, �3�
(08', b3,S
,Ex;s��N' P��k,N� c�e�;f - 5s, o°�
_ ! 3, 5 -45 -'`�
x g, 5 9�.�a - � '`.' ..�'`.�'�'` �
� D�� � � �9��
� i 1 �� �� ► , ,�
::� __ _
� .
+.. _ _ _ _
'� � •
/ � - ~
^` � ��— �\� O..a.�� �
� N�( ` � � '�"
� �� � 7 :�.. 2 ,
�� ; � � � ����
� � -�-- .�.
� ��. ; � -� --�-
....�..._ ._ -- - ._.
1�4 3 � �
� �� ; �- -e- -�--
� r d , n .�,
, ..� _,;,,.
sr'��' ; . 3 -Q- 8r ��'�'r��ve� �� �dV
5�!� ; _ � ._�$ `e-
i� � �
�.�, �.� � � '
r,�-�-- .
l�k�I�4 Cu�w. �c�a�.�.--P O <�P
13�.�.�; "� 1�4-`�O 5�5 � �3
� � ; -e' l��� 593.5 .�'
2 ^'� ; �,� � �J- 113�f 2 3� I -�—
3 =°� : 5!� 9' '� 0 9' ��° -�-
�� .� � 9 7 q � $I � -�-
5 � ; 2 81°f 13 5 -�- $
_ _____.�._�_.._
_ - ,._ -.--.�. - ._ ,�
15, S�I 5zol �:�,6�. 9 5�
6zo (
h'lA�c, co►�n,�,oN =" 2 3�9 5
285(0
t i5�� f
=-----.�
�!8',397
� N ° �/ � �
v-I o
_' �. .
�; O
O
�; �"� p �
O .
` O
N p
M p
, N
M
�
`i
�
�
U
�
.,�
U
� �
�
�
A
.,-�
� �
c!� .,�
� �
� �
O
''� W
� O
�
,A �
''� 3
� O
� H
_. �
U �
�
�
N
\
d'
� O
O 61
� � N
r-I ,�
W O �Z ,
O
¢ �1 p �
Q �
a � �
i co x �
a �-�I U �
c� � W �
�' x
o U
�
issia� sodv� _�';;
�
, . .�Z_..J
. . ... , .�-:;_----_. .- �'�--=���.a�.-�--.�►��... . �;�► C .
� . ,
SS�i.�.... .._.._........,... _. ...._.:. „�.... . ._.... �.:,_., .._.... ......_. ......... "pf.�:
41t, ,iX
s�:
dR;+'
;sJ ' '1'OWN O1-V/�fL iaH;c:�i�rrrvo.--------
.
;;� -
;� � � �� ur.r�urrnu�.n r c�r•cunt��turvrrv ur.vr.�.ornn,rv•r ;g;
�
� NAhTB-- --_,r.)-__._ ia
//�� y � 1 x
� AUURIiSS_ -- -------��,4�=l�L�-- `�„^' � llA7'E_C�/�/ � �n��:
PROJF.C'P J ���� �,,u� y}�
CIIF,CKS htADN;PAYARLF.'1'O TO\VN OI%VAII, ?{1;
�; .:.:_ACCbUN'PNO.._ .. :..... .......... . . ......� .,. . .�.�,��Nt . .. -:,,, ..� ,, 1VU. �..�",I,AX , CUS'1'NA. •"""".TO't'AL.,. �
dr
i
'� 01 0000 41540 70NING nND nDDRI;Sti MnPS $SAO * ��'�
w 01 0000 42d15 UNIFORM BUILDING CODI; 9�54.00 * ��
��'� 01 0000 42415 UNINORM I'LUM131NG CbDG 4+39.00 * ��'°�
' "`' 01 0000 42415 UNIFORM MI?CIInNICnL COI)I: �37.00 *
C".
'3 01 U000 42�115 UNih'OK(Vl I�IRIi CODI; $3G.00 * a�
� k°�': 01 0000 42415 HAT10NnL I:l,l?CTRIC'nl,CODI; $37.00 * �u
��'' 01 0000 42415 OTf II;R CODI? l3OOKS * �`
'y:r.
;;� Ul 0000 415a�ti 13LU1:PRINTS (MYLnKS) :�7.U0 * ��
. �
:�- 01 0000�12412 XIsROX COPII;S � R0.25 *
'=` 01000042412 STUDII;S
* v�s
�!' ,•.x
r°� 01 0000 42412 TOVI�liI;S COMPUTI:R PRUGRnM �5.00 * "`
��' 01 0000 42371 PI?NnLTY I�I;I;S/ IZI;-INSPIsC'1'IONS '''�
�1,ti
`": 01 0000 41332 PLnN RI;VII;W RI;-C111?Ch FI:I: 5+40 PI;R I IR. ``;:`
>,,
'�; O1 0000 42332 OFI� 11OURS INSI'I;C:TION Fl:l:ti 4-;
'� 01 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LIC I:NSI:S FliliS "w',
a 01 0000 41413 SIGN nPPLICnT'ION Fi'I? 5�20.00 ��'
?;-' 01 00O0 41413 ADDITIONnL SIGNnGI; f�l�.l', [�I.Op I'I:R SQ.I�T.] ;:,
J% 01 0(1O0 42440 VTC nRT I'KO.II:CT DUNATION `'''
�;, 01 000041331 PRI: P/�If) DI:SIGN RI;VIIiW 13OAIZD I�lili �-
• 01 000042371 iNVI:STIGnTION 1�1;1: 13UILOING ;.�
; 31 0000 451 10 TOV PnItF:ING I�UND "'!'.
c� 01 0000 22027 TOV NI;WSPnPI:R DISPI;NSIiR I�UND �`:
�'" * O1 0000 21112 7'AXA[3LL(ci)4"/� (STA'T['s) n��'
�'�. * O1 00111141010 TA\A13LE(a)4"%� ('I'O�VN)
;� 01 0000 42171 13UILDINC; NVI;STIGn`I'ION, ��
� }.. ~ t �` O"T'Iililt - >- _ ,�. >:.}
� ". � . �.�� r ,J.,
�4 U��"�� - �i.
�' . 1'I!.TC A('('LlCAT10 FEGS , r'r
��� 01 0000 d1330 �ADDI"flONnL GRI�A "250" �200.00 � ��'
,.�.
Y Ol 0000 4 1 330 CONDITI(>NnL USI�I'I;RfV11T n20O.00 „
� Ol 0000 41330 I:XTI?RIOR ALTIiRnTION [LI:SS TI InN 100 SQ.I?'1'.) �260A0 �
??� 01 0000 41330 I:XTI;R(OR/�I;I'I:RnTiON [MOftl;TIIAN 1O0 SQ.I�T.J $50O.0O ;� �
;� 01 000041330 SPI'CInL DI:VI;LOPMI:NT DIS�rriic�r [NI�.W] fi1,SO0.00 "':�
� O1 OOOQ 41330 SPI:CInL DI?VI.'LOPMI;N'I'DIST�tiC'�`�MnJOR nMI;ND] �1,0O0.00 �'�a
:� 01 000041330 SPI;CInL DisVIiLOPMI:N"f nIS'I'RICT MINOIZ nMI;ND] $20O.00 ':.�`�
'�' O1 0000 41330 SUI3DIVISION ��'
,,�., �_,r
, 01 0000 d 1330 VnIZInNCI: � 4�250.00
�s; 01 0000 41330 10NING C'ODI;�1M1?Nf)MI?NTS $250.00 �
„ Ol 00011 4 1 3 3Q RI?-%ONING $ZbU.00 �
sg O'1'I 1 I;K z�
� OTI I GR :l,;r
N TOTA L: -- r��
� �
COMMGNTS: ______ _ _ �
3' �
sY
''� �
� Y
:� ��'
� cnsu �— , �K.N►�f-�—`--�ri.o�._�
Rec.nv: �
q7 `� ,
-# r
C
' ` Dz-sign Review Action F�n
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number �f',.�. Date /Y t a�.. ��95
�
Project Name: �`,�E:::,-f�e.,_ ->>��.� �'�a r��._P �
Building Name: �"
Project Description: k ' �� �, - .�`:,. '�
,-r ,�' ��' �., �
' � / �,
��r�- ;,}�k c,.:�C. L� Dw � /�ct ��{ 7 f -f' i
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: �n_Q r�i �_��_ �'�, ==�--�-v„a'cr.-- �, rf�'.�, r; :--��L-<,` �
_ �;% ,
<-0 ! ��� L.,..e.�,1 �� �� ' � �
Legal Description: Loti�� Block Subdivision ;�t. V.•-�,1��,_ - Zone District
Project Street Address: :� �� � i°�. ,,,,,.� ~f�_
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motion by: Vote:
Seconded by:
❑ Approval
❑ Disapproval
�Staff Approval
Y
Conditions: �,Q�,,,-�..,� �,,, .�,,,� ,,,..; /
�l,, �� I'""��'�.��.;,.�.
Town Planner
�,..-
Date: � • �� �i_`� DRB Fee Pre-paid ����
� o �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ������ 0� �� °� ������Q�
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201
DATE JOB NO. �
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 �f fG1 i�j �
ATTENTION ���
To -�'�wN oF �gl I. �hMUt�l�"1" �rt/�1 , RE
� s� �����-�,��,����"
_ � ��
��I l., �I-�a1��ra ���
WE ARE SENDING YOU �Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order �, p�rl?�{ �
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints �1, Plans ❑ Samples � Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
� /�'�i �''J OD (.)
� �I� i ���r���� - ° � � �.� �I
�h- � !'�� � �� ��� . -� t� i �.
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
�As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
{� For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> �For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For review and comment C,
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS�I � �)
�'� `��u ���I t'r�'��'G1� I N ��� l��t'���- j��'�-t�
N1���t �, �-�iG1� � -� I-�.�y� L Wt��'�- �o�-i"Q t�'
-t , �U F �-t� � �
�U � G=4'�� �wi � � i rl����
�I-Ft� t-� �#"4-� U I r��� I--�G��
� o �f
� � � � ����
C'�I l�l���I��i"��, `�a�u�t'IoN�. �'r �aUl�"N ���
COPY TO f I�M I'I'. �NL �����a
iN�UG� �1'IGM����""I ' ����� �-G�""��T. SIGNED: �
It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notity us a once.
� � � � � � � '. � _ .���r�r�� � -
. , . . �n� �►�►��;, .
• � lt G1.�1'' ��'i','�.Y.Izt`� Od+� ' ' . � , �c�`i,' I�'I!1.13 �f�+'`�'ONK�
_ , '�I l.f� , / �'�� �A IN�� . . , ,
°�'� �04�5 Z�c.l. �G�.��, , , � � �
t�_��i� r� " ' " . � " - " . ' �
, .
. .
� .
. �tom p �
, �� � �` ��� � � • ,
• ' u I F'►��H� i°Ffit", ��Y ' � -
' � �.�,�� �°�'` `�-.-'�
. . , _� _ � � . .
� P�� �
g� ���
1°i4-�It-�. , ,
(�IL►��, . , , - . , . . , . ., ,
', �`r'��"1��'�� 'LKt f�oo.l� tl�t
, .
�dB'�? ���°��� � �, � , . ��y p� �' ' .
�L. , �../..� , �� � � . � �
�� • ' , ' . ' . D.l�-��"T � ��'`�
• ` ' ��� LI��
. w , , -
� ���"� M��-I�, �U I �T'.
�-I ��-�1" �L��✓�rt-I a►�
" 3/$� ` G ��p I( o
. �.�.�����-. I•��u�
_ _ �f''ai 1�-��W�- W�t- .. � .
� �� �� _ �
� uN� � ���,( ' ��.
I'�W \��� �? h`'��t �� �
� �`�\` , � I�r"�"' � `•�'
�
� �k �
_ �r-a PI
i�l� � _ �..,�-�- \ � `,
G,t,r�l� �N�rt- • � �;����,�'��,\..
� I-f oop I � �
�`
r � r
, �Tlb�o1�HI�H�
�UI�M1'�tw�l Nc,
� _ �--'�''1"v�'' ���-I-, � �I�°M-i"
. - _ ._.
���
� . .
----- o-_:��$_ _ � �,o ,
k r•`f`.;? r �;(=a� .,4•,, � ' N,p� A �'< c:,, 6� , '
'v�d ,.: jC�v:i fw:G� �i�c�dp`e.:i�a�l`�E"'6:v3 C t�::y;'.�';-,� .
� ��►c�Cf���r 4 C'FJd� ��::: F;•'�'�_ti,.�.� MAY 4 i995 �
...... _ . . . .. Sr4:';p 5,,,.r.:-�v...���' ... . ., iy ' •
' • •
�
. � . ' � . �
� ' • ,
� � , • . .
, ' . ' • ' . �
. . ,
, , �
� , tiYrl rH�L' •
. �'�o -
� . � � � � �1 MI�?ft OH , � ,
. ���� � "� .
Y b . o�
, , � � �� , � ��.I�'fi'�_ 1;�v�.l.
_-_ _ J����U�rr-�T ' � �� '
__�u� r���-t�r+-t� � . � _ 1% i�i�� . .
_ . . t�-��-��`�''or�t�
�'�r�i� TB MpT��t � �
_..o�`'�r=t"1'N�.'f'1� q'1�Llc,�la �
_ �I M 1h�-i' Gol..��- , ' �
. . . X GUT �'P�T'i�fLP't-t W�ao�
I I-Ir�tT W 4x4- r�I r�1'�
, , ,r�fti � �taL {�-lovk�
;c�- -�-r,��►���
��, ; . � . . . : • � _ t�o�r� ; �
. -'�` 0O�`�i°" -�, N1�-t�t'1G � �. . ��' �au i�-�i'/
�� �o�'- H��' . G�t.�t�,o � . . � , 1'�`a N �u'°�° {-F°°�
�����' (ti _ . � }�1 r+�g� , � �fio #� w.�w r�t�b '1'd
���p ��� . , � . ��►-�G�t. �jl"QJ t-��i�
G�d �C%l H� _ , • . . • , , j�-tt�01'J �I1�1 r�Gr
t�fi �'a u ��-� � .
:���-� �a gt'��-. �ui �--u�
. G�i��. i��
; .
�
�j'I�""ol� I��!�-�I�. �a� '1°�1'-
h�a#� ��-�v��1'i o r-�
m �/f�t� $ � '- a u o
,
;�r�o���or ���#�oplc�ra���r��t;����s . . 4 �g5
2� Ga►e�Creek D�i•ve 3J3 476-2��1 MAY .
' �Iail. Go!or�do �1��; ,
. � ` _ ' �
� I �, I I I \ � I
_ �� �� �
\ � �
c I
� ( '� y �
,� � ��� � �
. � �-- '� �ti� , -�;;�
. � i ' \ � r
/ - . � ,-- , �.
� �, - - - _ �. � _1
� �
b _
1Ja a - �,- , _.. -
, ( - ,
�� - ;.
_ � �
�' y � � ' '�,
; � � � � , ,
_ � _
I K - ;
�� N '
�
! p � !' �I �� `��JG� �� �II � I _ �I,��� �,�I�
- �4 'i - .�
, . - � � ___ - - -
� 'r� � /,�. i /� � �y� ,y
! ''� ' � �; �
' � �
--1 �� � �
--- - �,� � - -
_ , ,..
� � �' �- ' �, � � ''
� i �'��� �i , _ ,i
� 1 = - . � f �, � �' i
�,1 0 � �'�y` ,�� ? � � --
= I ,
_ �,, O ; , `�
o ,,� ��s�-� a
,—
�' - -- � � �� � . � � '� ��
1 I ' I
r t �_
, N �� � �� a�
� �_ \
\ � -
� �' ° �
� _ ! - '�= G� � MAY 4 � �
1(V \ - - ' � - - - - - �
I 3�o' _ don and l�opK�r���Arc�����4�
- C � 2U Go�O Cfee�c C�ri�ve� 3�3 475-2201
•
�— �., ,.��� �C Va�:Co�r�r�:d� 816�?
�. ��� ' � /
/ ' /� ~�� �.-
/ r �
` �.� � � \ � �� �c
� - c I/ . / c . ���`'� .
,.\ .. � X , b �; 'g _'
. y� �
. ''l .,., � W
Z
Q �
J L,� .�
�� 0
_ �
� -
� �.� L�
��� �
� � � ���
��1 ., ��� ? � Z
.
��� � ���i � ; �
Q } a ��z� x --
�- �� �—
' � U
z�. � �
��� °�����LI�� � � r �.�]
�-� � � .
� �'' �� $� ` C1�
� ; �� �
� � �3 i
� �, � �� , Z
�j� � � �Z ' O
z�p� (Y' �L- Z ` �9-
5��3 �1 D �� � "� . ~
�� �* � � � Q
� ` �_ � � � � >
�r, ` �� �� � �
���J � � .
� { � �� �
�' � � � -' � tL1
� � � -
� ��� �-
� , � � � , (f�
� • �, ' Ll�
� �0 � '
� � � . �
� �� �t �
� N � O
.� � � -
� � S�
� n
Q M I
�
� Q ,� �
C l0 ' � X�-- 1
0 (a I � \�� V
�
� .> � �= � JS ?� �O
� U � � � �0 S� �v �
� 'm
a� �o��
O U � � �' ���Q. �-d`
� o i `� ���*..' � ��� S
c � � o� �1 . _
3�--s s
v� � �
,,
� .l ` ` �..I�I
• �������__
1���''�
' � Ir'���II;.
I / l����I
/
�
` 'I,�I'll
1 , •
• U � �� ���'�
� . � �I i•�:w����
• ` i�wiAI�I
• � �I ����Ile
\ � —
� • !�l�•� �
\ � �■�
_ -
� , \ —
� , 1 ` \ I�
.
� /
/
- �
1 �
� � � ..� , __
� I ���
=�����s
,' I � �i�.�.�iii
� \ �i w I�i�����1 i
, M _ � , - -
� � --i=.���
II! �►- �- ; rl��l
, �i�,��ii
� � � � I��',��I
� � ���'�'�
,/ � � ; ����1�11��J I
• / '/ �. . S - -
� �■�
! �
. `
w � � ---
: ' 1 'I :�;
� ' , � �..� ��
� � �
. � � ,
� '
\ I I
e e
1 �. ' ;___��; ` , �
, I ; ■�.`■I : , i
� � f I/". \�j � � �.
� ��QU� � I
� ' (��i��l � � ; ,���
i�� � � i
( �
1 �
' ' � .� �.
i
�
` � �I � I ���
` � 1 ������II i � �
j ��" �� � � 1 � ■
' � •
, i' �'�f-�� x I " �� �'
. �� ��
.
� I
. `
�
. ,
� � .
Y�-" ���
�
4ya." t�
:
�
. � - �.' �-�� �N� C�P
. � ° .
�N G�NC.�. �.�. � ' .
. . o 0 3/q.�� �1rt.�o F.,�•
� ' sIDE
1 J �� G� �'J'fi' I�" �'O �'l1°�F-�'l��f'fi' - SdU"I"'t'}'
ly�- = CI'� p
i�a�-� ,�.,�,�.� • ,�.� ,�, >��
. � °�. / ��°�` .�
,
�r�QV�don ��d�opk�n��Arch���c��
20 Go*e Creek �r�ve 303 47s-22o� MAY 4 1995
.. . �,�,., _,, : ; ,,� Vail� Colorado 87657 � . .
,
� •
�
� .3' rM",1�OL�UY
�,
L Zr�r�r O 2�0
~~�1y'` ��
-�..__� J '�6
l J�Jir���71ffflV
�~�'` S7C7��IAIS
`��-�
��_
�-_
�_
��
AA9� INY `~~���``• ,!�£Mb'�/1�l ft�P
�'�iWS-�'� . ~` �
q�'�u o� 4fRT, ANG�£ �� ~'��-�.`
`cc�. LEG' Tt7 6�'A,N
A�YT. L .��r.��r�R NO10�•'
I�E7PT, LC6 AS�'4Z� AT
SrC�A1'D 6�iU/S f�i'P I�fRT.
LE�' lt� MEZD R7 E�"A�I
h 2lNdC '16
S7F�Z SIUO II�tU
.�'ARLK6'1FCl
�l
. , . �, . .,.
.
.,.
h
S�C T/�N �� �z"- 1 '- O
�r��wd�on and Hopkin��Architects
ZO Go*e Creek crtve 303 476-220� MAY ` 4 1995
�-,, .,'��: . � Vail, Coforado 8�6�7
JVPy IHC. SUPPLEMEhTA� SU�11
GOLDEN ��AK HQUSE REMODEL �R��nNC Na.:
`�"'�{'� �`„"`„'� ��`"`°r' VAIL► CQLORADO o�r�
1.11p !3��11(`F 9T,
BOInRFR, rnrx+�n� nnvn 4-19-95
(30J) a�t�-1951
. � .s o �
� � � �
. �i-- .
O w � � " � �*� .
.� --� `� � � o �
, �
, � � � �.
. 1� � � �
; � � . � c�
�- _ �-- --'t- r
� � � �,
� ' � -- --�M_. - --_
_ � � � � � �
.�� � � 3� � � � ��• �.
' ; 0 Q � ��
� � �
�� � ° -- ' � w �
o� � o �^ � r
J � L � ,y �
i w� I � � y � � �
� .
..J I . _` . I � � �Pr �
• 1'�. ` . �I �� I �- N y����l I� E�
� � ��
� ��� " � � ° v� �
?�•p�� 4 � .�oil� � �
� -r = � � � ,; � J� 3 Z- � -�pc
, � _ �� I � ' � � � `
� � � � � � � � � �
- �i� �� � o _-,,t_ .. , �
� _ � �� �
�, �S �
- � S - �
_ ' .S: � -1
� �. s I �^ � �6 s � `-� � s
- � --� p' - � � � �
`- �� �_� � t� -F' � �Z` � O
1 .�� ���D �. �iI-�II `II — _° � � e �
. �� � - � � , �
, � �
.:, � OI Z ,� � � j(
- �� ^ � �
-.. �- �
.1 l� 6 = , �
�; � �,., � � � �, �.,i ,
v► �� � _ +-�- ,
_ -
.. . �_ , � — --��� � \
�
��
• �
M��
1y F '' P" `�, "°� 9,/
��
TOWN OF VAIL � �.:�. ` �
L
75 South Frontage Road Departrnent of Communiry Development
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138/479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
May 5, 1995
Clark S. Willingham
GPH Partners, Ltd.
One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606
Dallas, TX 75219-4471
RE: Golden Peak House Redevelopment
Dear Clark:
Enclosed please find an executed original of the Type III Employee Housing Unit restrictive
covenant for Condominium Units 9-E and 9-D of Pitkin Creek Park. The Town will retain a set
of originals and we will have the final set of originals recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and
Recorder. This should be accomplished on Monday.
We are continuing to pull together all the outstanding details so that we may issue the building
permit for the Golden Peak House. At this time, it appears that everything is in order and I do not
anticipate any delays with the issuance of the permit. Thanks again for your patience and
cooperation.
Sincerely,
� /"I�
Mike Mollica
Assistant Director of Planning �
enc.
. �"�
f o •
TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
WHEREAS, GPH PARTNERS, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, ("the Owner")
is the owner of certain property described as: Condominium Unit 9-D, Pitkin Creek Park Phase
III According to the Condominium Map recorded August 13, 1980 in Book 306 at Page 866
as Reception No. 203249 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for
Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums recorded March 31, 1980 in Book 300 at Page 924 as
Reception No. 197313 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration recorded, January 6, 1981
in Book 315 at Page 945 as Reception No. 212319 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration
recorded 7uly 2, 1981 in Book 325 at Page 464 as Reception No. 221828. Subject to the Terms,
Conditions, Obligations and Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and
Supplements thereto. County of Eagle, State of Colorado,("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions on the use of the Property for
the benefit of the Owner and the Town of Vail, Colorado ("the Town").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and
declare for the benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, or lease, or hold the subject
Property, the following restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to
run with the Property and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective
grantees, successors, and assigns.
l. The Property, containing approximately 900 square feet, is hereby restricted as
a Type III Employee Housing Unit (EHU) which must comply with all the
provisions of Section 18.57.020, 18.57.030, and 18.57.060 of the Vail Municipal
Code as amended as of the date hereof.
2. A Type III Employee Housing Unit shall be leased to tenants who are full-time
employees who work in Eagle County. An EHU shall not be leased for a period
less than thirty consecutive days. For the purposes of this section, a full-time
employee is one who works an average of thirty hours each week.
3. A Type III EHU may be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from other
dwelling units or Employee Housing Units that may be located on the same lot
or within the same building so long as it meets the following conditions:
a) It must be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. For
the purpose of this paragraph, a permanent residence shall mean the home
or place in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he
or she is absent, has a present intention of returning after a departure or
absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of absence. In determining
what is a permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following
circumstances relating to the owner of the residence into account: business
pursuits, employment, income sources, residence for income or other tax
C:\WP60\CLIFIVTS\GPI-nLFASE-9D.EMP 1
_ ��
. � • •
purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children,
if any, location of personal and real property, and motor vehicle
registration.
b) If a Type III EHU is sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the
other dwelling units and/or Type III Employee Housing Units in a
multifamily structure it is a part of, or from other dwelling units and/or
Type III EHUs located on the same lot, the other Type III EHUs in the
structure or on that lof shall remain subject to all the provisions set forth
in Section 18.57.020.
4. Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the prospective
purchaser shall submit an application to the Community Development Department
documenting that the prospective purchaser meets the criteria set forth above and
shall include an affidavit affirming that he or she meets those criteria.
5. A Type III EHU shall not be divided into any form of time shares, interval
ownership, or traditional fee ownership as those terms are defined in the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
Rwtc
6. The owner of each EHU shall rent the unit at a monthly rental ��onsistent
with or lower than those market rates prevalent for similar properties in the Town
of Vail.
7. The Town of Vail Housing Authority will determine the market rate based on the
study of other units or comparable size, location, quality and amenities through
out the Town. The market rate shall be based on an average of a minimum of
-�;vc � rental rates of comparable units. If the unit is not rented and is not available
at the market rate it shall be determined to be in noncompliance. In addition to
any other penalties and restrictions provided herein, a unit found to be in
noncompliance shall be subject to publication as determined by the Housing
Authority.
8. No later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit
within the Town which is constructed following the effective date of this chapter
shall submit two copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Community
Development Department, to the Community Development Department of the
Town of Vail and Chairman of the Town of Vail Housing Authority setting forth
evidence establishing that the employee housing unit has been rented throughout
the year, the rental rate, the employer, and that each tenant who resides within
the employee housing unit is a full time employee in Eagle County.
9. The provisions of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by the Owner and
the Town.
C:\WP60\CLIEN'I'S1GPH\LEASE-9D.EMP 2
. �
/ • •
10. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall
not be waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent
of both the Town of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
By; �� • �.,---
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this��'"`� day of � I9�J—,
�v� ,� r
otary Public �'
,VIy commission expires: �•v ��+�t���issio�;�z;�iresJur� t% �yyy
Property Owner: GPH PARTNERS, LTD.
. ,
By:
Clark S. Willinghai , eneral partner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13 day of APri1, 1995
r � � �y
Notary P lic
My commission expires: 8/10/96
;•�;�•"�:�: MARTY MURPHREY
`*: *: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
"=;�. .�:� August 10,1996
��i f p 1F��`�
C:\WP60\CLIENTS\GPH\LEASE-9E.EMP 3
!
I � •, • •
TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
WHEREAS, GPH PARTNERS, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, ("the Owner")
is the owner of certain property described as: Condominium Unit 9-E, Pitkin Creek Park Phase
III According to the Condominium Map recorded August 13, 1980 in Book 306 at Page 866
as Reception No. 203249 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for
Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums recorded March 31, 1980 in Book 300 at Page 924 as
Reception No. 197313 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration recorded, January 6, 1981
in Book 315 at Page 945 as Reception No. 212319 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration
recorded 7uly 2, 1981 in Book 325 at Page 464 as Reception No. 221828. Subject to the Terms,
Conditions, Obligations and Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and
Supplements thereto. County of Eagle, State of Colorado,("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions on the use of the Property for
the benefit of the Owner and the Town of Vail, Colorado ("the Town").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and
declare for the benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, or lease, or hold the subject
Property, the following restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to
run with the Property and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective
grantees, successors, and assigns.
1. The Property, containing approximately 900 square feet, is hereby restricted as
a Type III Employee Housing Unit (EHU) which must comply with all the
provisions of Section 18.57.020, 18.57.030, and 18.57.060 of the Vail Municipal
Code as amended as of the date hereof.
2. A Type III Employee Housing Unit shall be leased to tenants who are full-time
employees who work in Eagle County. An EHU shall not be leased for a period
less than thirty consecutive days. For the purposes of this section, a full-time
employee is one who works an average of thirty hours each week.
3. A Type III EHU may be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from other
dwelling units or Employee Housing Units that may be located on the same lot
or within the same building so long as it meets the following conditions:
a) It must be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. For
the purpose of this paragraph, a permanent residence shall mean the home
or place in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he
or she is absent, has a present intention of returning after a departure or
absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of absence. In determining
what is a permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following
circumstances relating to the owner of the residence into account: business
pursuits, employment, income sources, residence for income or other tax
C:\WP60\CI.IENTS\GPI-nLFASE-9E.EMP 1
, � • •
purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children,
if any, location of personal and real property, and motor vehicle
registration.
b) If a Type III EHU is sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the
other dwelling units and/or Type III Employee Housing Units in a
multifamily structure it is a part of, or from other dwelling units and/or
Type III EHUs located on the same lot, the other Type III EHUs in the
structure or on that lot shall remain subject to all the provisions set forth
in Section 18.57.020.
4. Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the prospective
purchaser shall submit an application to the Community Development Department
documenting that the prospective purchaser meets the criteria set forth above and
shall include an affidavit affirming that he or she meets those criteria.
5. A Type III EHU shall not be divided into any form of time shares, interval
ownership, or traditional fee ownership as those terms are defined in the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
R�+�
6. The owner of each EHU shall rent the unit at a monthly rental � consistent
with or lower than those market rates prevalent for similar properties in the Town
of Vail.
7. The Town of Vail Housing Authority will determine the market rate based on the
study of other units or comparable size, location, quality and amenities through
out the Town. The market rate shall be based on an average of a minimum of
.,vc �rental rates of comparable units. If the unit is not rented and is not available
at the market rate it shall be determined to be in noncompliance. In addition to
any other penalties and restrictions provided herein, a unit found to be in
noncompliance shall be subject to publication as determined by the Housing
Authority.
8. No later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit
within the Town which is constructed following the effective date of this chapter
shall submit two copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Community
Development Department, to the Community Development Department of the
Town of Vail and Chairman of the Town of Vail Housing Authority setting forth
evidence establishing that the employee housing unit has been rented throughout
the year, the rental rate, the employer, and that each tenant who resides within
the employee housing unit is a full time employee in Eagle County.
9. The provisions of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by the Owner and
the Town.
C:\WP60\CLIENCS\GPHU..EASE-9E.EMP Z
.
, � •
10. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall
not be waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent
of both the Town of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
By; �� ���'
Bob McLaurin, own Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �"'`� day of m /q�'�
� ���L.
s�tary Public �
My commission expires: ��?y Commissio�;�;�ai+e�J�r�e 1I, ly��
Property Owner: GPH PAR'rNERS, LTD.
B .����� ` ,
Y•
Clark S. Willing , general partner \
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13 �y of April, 1995
i�� �� y
Notary blic
My commission expires: 8/10/96
.. . ,,;,�y
�;�N_""y,�`-{:"�- .,.r;;;:i��S�'�i;�,iivcXPIRES
%,r�.��+* r1lI�USt��, �9�
C:\W P60\CLIENTS\GPH\LEASE-9E.EMP 3
1 ,.. t
�j � ; K �oll��4 ��-�� —
r� r1 �� �
•(,� +' \
,���'
TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
563U14 B-666 P-991 05/lU/95 UL : IIP YG 1 OF 3 hEC l101;
Sara J . Fisher Eagle Countv Clerk & Recorder 15 .OU
WHEREAS, GPH PARTNERS, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, ("the Owner")
is the owner of certain property described as: Condominium Unit 9-E, Pitkin Creek Park Phase
III According to the Condominium Map recorded August 13, 1980 in Book 306 at Page 866
as Reception No. 203249 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for
Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums recorded March 31, 1980 in Book 300 at Page 924 as
Reception No. 197313 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration recorded, January 6, 1981
in Book 315 at Page 945 as Reception No. 212319 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration
recorded July 2, 1981 in Book 325 at Page 464 as Reception No. 221828. Subject to the Terms,
Conditions, Obligations and Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and
Supplements thereto. County of Eagle, State of Colorado,("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions on the use of the Property for
the benefit of the Owner and the Town of Vail, Colorado ("the Town").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and
declare for the benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, or lease, or hold the subject
Property, the following restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to
run with the Property and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the Q��, the`respective
grantees, successors, and assigns. r{�,'',< � , �, =.,_ ,
, ,
n !':� : . i
. i{ ,i
l. The Property, containing approximately 900 sq�are.fe�t; is�he'reby restricted as '�
a Type III Employee Housing Unit (EHU) which must comply with all the �
provisions of Section 18.57.020, 18.57.030, and 18.57.060 of the Vail Municipal �
Code as amended as of the date hereof. =�
2. A Type III Employee Housing Unit shall be leased to tenants who are full-time
employees who work in Eagle County. An EHU shall not be leased for a period
less than thirty consecutive days. For the purposes of this section, a full-time
employee is one who works an average of thirty hours each week.
3. A Type III EHU may be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from other
dwelling units or Employee Housing Units that may be located on the same lot
or within the same building so lorig as it meets the following conditions:
a) It must be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. For
the purpose of this paragraph, a permanent residence shall mean the home
or place in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he
or she is absent, has a present intention of returning after a departure or
. absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of absence. In determining
what is a permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following
circumstances relating to the owner of the residence into account: business
pursuits, employment, income sources, residence for income or other tax
C:\W P601CLIE1V7'S\G PH\LEASE-9E.EMP 1
. �'+
. •
purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children,
if any, location of personal and real property, and motor vehicle
registration.
b) If a Type III EHU is sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the
other dwelling units and/or Type III Employee Housing Units in a
multifamily structure it is a part of, or from other dwelling units and/or
Type III EHUs located on the same lot, the other Type III EHUs in the
structure or on that lot shall remain subject to all the provisions set forth
in Section 18.57.020.
4. Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the prospective
purchaser shall submit an application to the Community Development Department
documenting that the prospective purchaser meets the criteria set forth above and
shall include an affidavit affirming that he or she meets those criteria.
5. A Type III EHU shall not be divided into any form of time shares, interval
ownership, or traditional fee ownership as those terms are defined in the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
�w�e
6. The owner of each EHU shall rent the unit at a monthly rental �t� consistent
with or lower than those market rates prevalent for similar properties in the Town
of Vail.
7. The Town of Vail Housing Authority will determine the market rate based on the
study of other units or comparable size, location, quality and amenities through
out the Town. The market rate shall be based on an average of a minimum of
�i,ie k� rental rates of comparable units. If the unit is not rented and is not available ��
at the market rate it shall be determined to be in noncompliance. In addition to �
any other penalties and restrictions provided herein, a unit found to be in �
noncompliance shall be subject to publication as determined by the Housing ;�
Authority.
8. No later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit
within the Town which is constructed following the effective date of this chapter
shall submit two copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Community
Development Department, to the Community Development Department of the
Town of Vail and Chairman of the Town of Vail Housing Authority setting forth
evidence establishing that the employee housing unit has been rented throughout
the year, the rental rate, the employer, and that each tenant who resides within
the employee housing unit is a full time employee in Eagle County.
9. The provisions of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by the Owner and
the Town.
563014 B-666 P-991 05/10/95 Q2 : 11P I�G 'L ON' 3
C:\WP60\CLIENTS\GPH\LEA SE-9E.EMP 2
^ •°-
� •
10. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall
not be waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent
of both the Town of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
By: �(�- �L-
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this •��'`�day of mQ�� :99_5:
�-�.� ..� �-
otary Public
, .. �.:�' :�L.l::l..r�..., � .. :iLi.'�V [�� :vVv
N�.y �ommission expires:
Property Owner: GPH PARTNERS, LTD.
, ,
By. L �� �' � �- "� .__ _ �
Clark S. Willingham, general partner �
. ' �
�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13 day of April, 1995
Notary Public
�`'`�,.�" `"' -� _ ->
�� �
My commission expires: 8/10/96
•i5'�" CpMAMSSl�PI�RfS
"�;E�.:;+'-� AuOust 10,1996
,.::��.x�.;
563014 B-666 P-991 05/10/95 02 : 11P PG 3 OF 3
C:\W P60\CLIENTS\GPH\LEASE-9E.EMP 3
� � � � k� ���,��
563015 B-666 P-99� 05/10/95 02 : 14P PG 1 OF 3 REC llUC
` Sara J . Fisher Eagle Countv Clerk & Recorder 15 . 00
� - � TYPE III EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
� RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
WHEREAS, GPH PARTNERS, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, ("the Owner")
is the owner of certain property described as: Condominium Unit 9-D, Pitkin Creek Park Phase
III According to the Condominium Map recorded August 13, 1980 in Book 306 at Page 866
as Reception No. 203249 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for
Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums recorded March 31, 1980 in Book 300 at Page 924 as
Reception No. 197313 and,,�upplement to Condominium Declaration recorded, January 6, 1981
in Book 315 at Page 945 as Reception No. 212319 and Supplement to Condominium Declaration
recorded 7uly 2, 1981 in Book 325 at Pa��464 as Reception No. 221828. Subject to the Terms,
Conditions, Obligations and Restrictioa�as contained in said Condominium Declaration and
Supplements thereto. County o\�ag1e;-$tate of Colorado,("the Property"); and
�.,.
�� ;-�c.��
WHERE�S, the Owner wi��i�to place certain restrictions on the use of the Property for.
the benefit of the Owner �� th�:;'�':�wn of Vail, Colorado ("the Town").
NOW, THEREFORE,�t�e Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and
declare for the benefit of all p�rsons who may hereinafter purchase, or lease, or hold the subject
Property, the following restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to
run with the Property and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective
grantees, successors, and assigns. ,�
�
�
1. The Property, containing approximately 900 square feet, is hereby restricted as �
a Type III Employee Housing Unit (EHU) which must comply with all the �
provisions of Section 18.57.020, 18.57.030, and 18.57.060 of the Vail Municipal
Code as amended as of the date hereof.
2. A Type III Employee Housing Unit shall be leased to tenants who are full-time
employees who work in Eagle County. An EHU shall not be leased for a period
less than thirty consecutive days. For the purposes of this section, a full-time
employee is one who works an average of thirty hours each week.
3. A Type III EHU may be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from other
dwelling units or Employee Housing Units that may be located on the same lot
or within the same building so long as it meets the following conditions:
a) It must be used by the owner of the EHU as a permanent residence. For
the purpose of this paragraph, a permanent residence shall mean the home
or place in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he
or she is absent, has a present intention of returning after a departure or
absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of absence. In determining
what is a permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following
circumstances relating to the owner of the residence into account: business
pursuits, employment, income sources, residence for income or other tax
C:1WP601CLIENTS\G PH\LEASE-9 D.EM P ] �
� � � �
purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children,
if any, location of personal and real property, and motor vehicle
registration.
b) If a Type III EHU is sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the
other dwelling units and/or Type III Employee Housing Units in a
multifamily structure it is a part of, or from other dwelling units and/or
Type III EHUs located on the same lot, the other Type III EHUs in the
structure or on that lot shall remain subject to all the provisions set forth
in Section 18.57.020.
4. Thirty days prior to the transfer of a deed for a Type III EHU, the prospective
purchaser shall submit an application to the Community Development Department
documenting that the prospective purchaser meets the criteria set forth above and
shall include an affidavit affirming that he or she meets those criteria.
5. A Type III EHU shall not be divided into any form of time shares, interval
ownership, or traditional fee ownership as those terms are defined in the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
6. The owner of each EHU shall rent the unit at a monthly rental �consistent
with or lower than those market rates prevalent for similar properties in the Town
of VaiL �
7. The Town of Vail Housing Authority will determine the market rate based on the
study of other units or comparable size, location, quality and amenities through ,.�
out the Town. The market rate shall be based on an average of a minimum of �
.�i,�, � rental rates of comparable units. If the unit is not rented and is not available wi,
at the market rate it shall be detennined to be in noncompliance. In addition to '�
any other penalties and restrictions provided herein, a unit found to be in
noncompliance shall be subject to publication as determined by the Housing
Authority.
8. No later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit
within the Town which is constructed following the effective date of this chapter
shall submit two copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Community
Development Department, to the Community Development Department of the
Town of Vail and Chairman of the Town of Vail Housing Authority setting forth
evidence establishing that the employee housing unit has been rented throughout
the year, the rental rate, the employer, and that each tenant who resides within
the employee housing unit is a full time employee in Eagle County.
9. The provisions of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by the Owner and
the Town.
563015 B-666 P-99L 05/"10/95 OL : 14P PG z OF 3
C:1WP60\CLIENTS\GPH\LEASE-9ll.EMP 2
r w • •
10. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall
not be waived, abandoned, terminated,�r amended except by the written consent
of both the Town of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
�
By: ,
Bob McLaurin, wn Manager
. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �^'� day of /� �s .
_� � � �� � JY-
� 'otary Public
My commission expires: F'a' �•�- �--�<<�;"���sJJ,� 1T, i995
Property Owner: GPH PARTNERS, LTD.
. , , ,
, .
- . . �,1
By. � !�' . / c _ . _--�� �
. . .�,
Clark S. Willingham, general partner `�
�
, �
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13 day of Auri1, 1995.
��" -- -�'� �� . � �, =/
Notary Public �
My commission expires: 8/10/96
:�1'•"•Ar''E%. MAR1Y MURPHREY
*;�••' MY COMMISStON EXPIRES
'•.,+,E•oF;E+�= Aupust 10, 1998 "
563015 B-666 P-992 05/10/95 U2 : 14P PG 3 OF 3
C:\W I'60\CLIENTS\GPH\LEASE-9D.EM P 3
�PARTNERS, LTD�
278 Hanson Ranch Road One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606
Vail, Colorado 81657 Dallas, Texas 75219-4471
303 476-5667• FAX 303-476-0470 214 523-3706• FAX 214 523-3929
April 18, 1995
Mr. Mike Mollica
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mike:
Enclosed please find three copies each of the EHU Restrictive Covenants for Pitkin Creek
Units 9D and 9E. These restrictive covenants are patterned after your form and sent to you in
compliance with Section 8, paragraph 1 of Ordinance 28, Series 1993. Please have Bob
McLaurin sign all three copies of each covenant. All six should then be presented for filing in
Eagle County. You and I can each retain a file stamped original.
Also enclosed is my check in the amount of $32,000.00 pursuant to Ordinance 28,
Section 8, paragraph 2. This check is for redevelopment of Seibert Circle. Please deposit this
check concurrent with the issuance of the building permit.
VA and the Golden Peak House Condominium Association are working on the
subdivision of Tract E, the deed of transfer for the Mill Creek Stream tract, the Pirate Ship Park
lease and the Lot C public pedestrian access agreement. Hopefully all will be in your office this
week.
Thanks for your continued support.
Yours very truly,
Clark S. Willingham
CSW/mm
enclosures
cc w/encl. Tom Moorehead
C:1 W P60\DA ILY\MO LLICA.LTR
MAR-02-01 15 = 09 FROM= YD= PAGE 1
� , �
Apri1 25, 1995
Town of Vait
C�mmunity Deve7opment
ATTN; Mr. Jim Curnutte
ViA FAX 479-2452
Re: Golden Peak House
Jim:
You are hereby authorized �o issue a demolition permit for the
Golden Peak �ouse Condominium project.
Sincerely,
GOLOEN PEAK HOU5� CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
�-� � _
J�� .� --
By: Ross yn�Valentine, Pr�sident
By: R� i ey, ice� e'si� en�retary
�
• " � •
.�
.
,�
��
TOWN OF vA1L
75 South Frontage Road Office of Town Attorney
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2107/FAX 303-479-2157
April 25, 1995 � '(J
�
HAND DELIVERED ��c�fa FQ�;�
���`
Roz Valentine � �� „����
Ron Riley �,�,` �:��
Attorneys in Fact Golden Peak House �����
278 Hanson Ranch Road �
Vail, CO 81657 ` '
Re: Golden Peak House Redevelopment
Dear Roz and Ron:
I have been asked to address several requirements or conditions concerning the issua::ce ef the
building permit for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House. The following document.s 7ave been
provided by Vail Associates and are presently being reviewed. Wnile the documents have n�t�et been
executed, I anticipate their execution shortly. Those documents are:
1. A Quit Claim Deed with Restrictions for 7`ract H which is at least an equiva:er.t area
to that of the area of the Tract E "overhead and deck" easements.
2. 1`he declaration of public pedestrian access across Lot C, which is located�ae*�vY�n the
Golden Peak House and the Hill Building.
3. A lease for the property on which the Pirate Ship Park is located.
Additionally, we have received the written commitment from Vail Associates that no b:ul3iag�-ill be
constructed on the Tract E Parcel that would be in non-compliance with the Uniform Buildi�� Code
or the Town of Vail zoning ordinances.
These documents will be executed and will not hinder or prevent tne issuance of the b�ildinn permit.
Very truly yours,
TOW1V OF AIL
/� �
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RT�f/aw
xc: Jim Mandel, Esquire
Mike Mollica,/
� �`"SENT BY� � 4-25-95 ; 9�16AM ; EAGLE f^��1VTY� 4764534:� 1/ 2
..�
Raport Dets: 04/25/95 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER
CERTIFICATE OF TAXES pU� PaQs' �
OHDER NO:�V21542 SCHEDULE Np; Rd101p8
VENDOR N0:70
LAND TITI.E GUARANTEE ASSESSED 70:
ATTN: KAREN HOR7N VAIL CORPORATION, THE
P. O. BOX 357 � �X 7
va�, CO e�g58
LEGAL D�SCRIPTION: VAIL, CO 81658
SUB:VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLK:5C LOT:B
DESC: � C PCLIN
MISC: BK-0191 PG-0437 DT-03/43/68 TY � �
MlSC: P•O MINIMUM VALUE �
N�1SC: BK-0625 PG-0653 B$p 11-22-93
CIASS: �200 ASSD VAL: 80
PARCEL; 210108223026
PARCEI�: 210108223028 SITUS ADD; Opp250 GORE CREEK OR VAIL
I T� Y�R TAX qMOUNT INT AMOUNT
19� 4.39 AbV.�N,MISC TOTAL DUE
70TAL TAXFS �'� Q•� 4.39
ASSESSMENT ASMT AMOUNT INT AMOUNT � . 4-39
TpTAL A$MT ADV,PEN,MISC TQTAL DUE
TAX LIEN� 7LS AMOUNT � ' . . �.�
70TAL CERT INT AMOUNT A�pEMPT F�E TOTAL bUE
GRAND TOTAL D1lE GOOD THftOUGH 04J30/95 . _ 0.00
ORIGl11lAL TqX BILLING FOR 1994 4•�
Authority Mlll lsvy �
EAGLE COUNTY Mtount
CMC 9.991 0.79 '
RE60J SCHOOL ��997 �•�Z
. TOWN OF VAIL 29�5�2 2.36
4.690 0.3$
MINTURN CEM�ERY DIS7RICT 0.033
VAiL PAR1( & RECREATION pIS 2 83� 0.00
COLQRqDO RIVER WATEA CO 0_23
VAIL WATER DIStRICT �•394 ��
��� 0.00
VAIL WATER 8, SANITATION bl p,�g�
VAIL VALLEY CONSpL.1DATEb 0.05
11PPER EAGIE VALLEY CONSQ � as� �'��
EAGIE COUNTY EMERGENCY $ 0.563 0.05
1.171 0.09
F�E FOR T�1lS CERTIFlCATE 54,866 4.39
10.00
.ALL TAX LIEN SA�E(TLS)AMOUNTS ARE SUAIEGT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENCIORSEM�NT OF CURRENT TAXES 8Y THE lIENHOLDER
oR TO ADV�RTISINc wN0 DlsTrtAINT WaRqqNT FEES, cHpN�ES MnY OCCUR aND THE TREASU�tER'S OFF�CE WILL NEED TO aE
I CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITi'ANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DA7�S; PER50NAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES-SEp7EMgER ��
REA�PROPERTy-OCTOgER 1.
SPECIAL TAXING DISYRICTS qND THE 60UNDARIES OF SUCH DlSTRICTS MAY BE ON F��E yy�H THE BOARD OF COUNTY
CQMMISSIONEqS,THE GOUNTY CLERK, OFl THE COl1N7y ASSESSOR_
Thia cwt:ficeto daae not Indude land ar improvaments aaeaesad under e seperoto schedule number,penanal proper�y texss,
transier tex o►mlec.tex collactsd t,n behali of orher ondtiss,spsciel or lood improvemant district rssessm�nts of
►nobilo homes,uNees epeoificelly mentlonad,
I.tha undersfyned,de i�ofaby cartify thac ttro entiro ernount of taxes due upo tF►e ahnve do.er� �e RE�SUr .
nit outstendlnp oales for unpa�d tax�s as shown by tF,e records in my olfice om which tha e�e - �y'f rgµ�D,
I amount requlred for red■mption are es n�ted heran.In witneas whereaf,1 eva hnrount set m � p°�edeemetl.,
- w nsi se this 04/2�/5�5
TREASURER, EAGLE COUNTY, SHERRY BRANDQN, gY i f' � ' ; ,�
��./u: �•. °
, �
,=
' � r� '•-. .:� `'
' �F '-•. .;• .�i'�,
c�GM�1:COLOP���
t �^S�VT BY� � 4-25-95 ; 9�16AM : �G� Cn►, �
N� 4764534;� 2/ 2
� � .
Raport Date: 04125l95 EAGLE COUNTY���J�R
CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE p�9e' �
�RDER N0: V21542
VENDOR NO•70 SCHEDULE N0: R00$037
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ASSESSED T0:
ATTN: KAREN HOR7H VAIL GORPORATiON, TF{E
P.0. BOX 357 � �x �
VAIL, CO 81658
LEGAL DESCRlP7�ON: VAIL, CO $1658 .
SUB:VAIL V{LLqG�FlLING 5 BLK;-LOT:-
DESC: TfiACT E �PEN SPACE
MISC: BK-o187 PG
MISC: -0353 TYP-0
M18C_ 8K-0625 PG-0653 BSD 71-22-93
CIASS: 0400 ASSD VAL: 3180
��:fl010430
pARCEI: 210708242pp6 SITUS ADp: 008335 HqNSON RANCH RD VAIL
TAX YEAR TAX AMOUNT iNT AMOUNT
1994 ADV,PEN,MISC TOTAL DUE
174.47 0.00 0.00
TOTAL TAXE$ i 74.47
ASSESSMENT ASM7�ARQOUNT ' • . 174.47
70TAL ASMT INT AMQUNT a�V,�E�v,MrsC Tor�u puE
TAX LIEN# 7LS AMOUNT INT AMOUNT �.�
TQTAL CERT REDEMPT FEE 70TAL DUE
GRAND TOTAL DUE GOOD 7HROUGFi 04/30/95 ' ' � O.Op
ORIGINAL TAX BILLING FOR 1994 174.47
��0� Mill Lsvy
EAGIE COUNTY Mtount
CMC 9'981 31.7B
RE60J SCHOpL 3.997 �� 71
TOWN QF VAIL 29 5�2 �•�
MINTURN CEMElERY DISTRtCT 4 s� 14.91
VAIL PqRK & iiECREA710N p�S 0.033 0.10
COLORApO RIVER WATER CO 2�g31 9.00
VAIL wATER pIS7RiCT o.3sa � 25
VAIL WATEH & SANITATION DI � �� �'�
VAIL VqL1Ey CONSpLIdATEp 1�067 1.80 �
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CON$0 0.583 �-39 '
EAGLE COUNTY EMERGENCY S �_��� 1.79
3.72 ,
FEE FOR 7FtlS CERTIFICATE 54.886 174.47
10.00
ALL TAX LIEN SALE{TLS) qMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENOOR5EMEN'r OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LfENHOLp�R
oR TO ADVERTI5ING ANb pISTRAIMT yyAqqANT FEES. CH�NGES MAY ocCUR AND THE TREASURER'S oFNCE WI�L NEED TO BE
CONTACTEb PHIpR TO REMITTAIVCE AFTER 7NE FOLLOV{nNG DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY ANp MOBl�E►�OMES-SEPTEMBER 1,
REAL PROpEq7'y-OCTOBER 1,
SPECIAL 7AXING DI5�ICTS AND THE BOUNpqRIES pF SUCH DISTRICTS Mqy BE ON FlLE WITH TNE SOARd OF COUNTY
COhAMISSIONERS,7HE COUNTY CLERK,OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR.
Th(a certifioate doos not includa land or irnprovenynts eeaassed under a saparate echodule numbar,personel property texee,
tfe�pfs�tpX O�mjsp,t�t eol(etted qn beh�{ot other nniltiss, spvcial or Iooal improvomeeH diatrict easosamento oi
nnabllo hornee. UrJeee speclficelly mentioned.
I,the Uhdeaigned,do he�eby certify thut the entire emo�nt of texea due upon s nhove dexcribad parcda ��
I d�outatendinp oales for unpeid t�zes ag ehown by the records fn my oifice fr wFNCh tha seme
emount�equired for redemption��e es notw�het�i�_�n w�tnss��y�reof, I Ironunto set m Y L t ������
h �_ Y.� ti.af th 04126%9�°��
TR�ASURER.EAGIE CQUNTY. SHERRY BRANbpN. BY ' �.��{�S�� �j . �. �� : �
t
: �
L W •1` . G
T � ��
�O•��'. .�� �
- �FC�''•.......r-•'���O
�Ml',CO��4
�
. j , -
; � I �
� i � � .
. � ��
�,_�_ _
; € j _
E E ;
, ,
____- �� � �� �� � � � �� � ��� � ;��. �
1020 WEST FIRST AVE.DENVER,GOLQRADO� 80223(303�825�1313)• FAX(303�825�32231 C�R�,�'�I�.
. . � �_,�� .
-, ��`_���j , -v _:+
April 21, 1995 ��� ���'����� �
;, �<::� t� �
j �i � .
� �.� . '
APR 2 4 1995
��1! rt�A��� �;Sr �x��-�
Mr. Jim Curnutte _
Town of Vail
Office of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Golden Peak House Redevelopment - Spruce Tree Relocation
Dear Jim,
In regards to the referenced scope of work, I submitted a letter to your office on April 21, 1995
proposing the replacement of the three (3) existing spruce trees located on the west side of the
building. As previously mentioned, the trees are to move to an area on the sc�uth east side of the
new building. Hyder Construction proposes to replace the existing trees, which total
approximately sixty-eight lineal feet, with two twenty-foot spruce trees and two fourteen-foot
spruce trees. It will be necessary to review the exact locations of the replacement trees in the near
future to verify this grouping as being reasonable and healthy.
I have appreciated you and your co-workers helpful and timely assistance in regards to this matter
and other items related to the procurement of the demolition and subsequent building permits.
Please let me know if there is anything else that I can do from our end to help expedite the
issuance of the permits.
Sincerely, � J ��� / / _ �Y���
� ��1„p��f' "'0'1!'�'ot �r/`L
T- --
(/
Doug Thompson
Project Manger
�;.�
� � �
,r . w
I
-o--
� � � � 1 '9 1 �� � � �
� S" � ,t ,..
, ' , . .
� 1
� � �_'
; , , �
t E . , . �
,
, .. ., �_; ���Z �
.___._'
_._.�_. , . .
�� 1020 WEST FIRST AV�.DENVER,COLORADO� 80223(303�82$�13�3)• FAX�(303t825�32231 C��R�-�����- �
-„
April 17, 1995
Mr. George Ruther
Town of Vail
Office of Community Development
75 Frontage Road
v'aii, i.O �10�7
Re: Golden Peak House Redevelopment
Dear George,
In regards to the referenced project, there are three existing spruce trees (2 - 2� foot and 1- 12
foot) located on the west side of the building that are planned to be relocated to the south east side
of the site. Hyder Construction had planned on relocating these trees prior to the demolitiun of
the building which is scheduled for April 26, 1995. We would like you and yaur department to
consider allowing Hyder Construction to remove the trees and replace them with either like size
spruce trees or a number of trees equal to the overall length of the existing trees. We are making
this request based on the following reasons:
• The Serrano's project is to occur concurrently with the Golden Peak House project,
moving the trees prior to demolition would put them in jeopardy of becoming damaged due
to the restricted site access on the south side of the buildings.
• The trees are located within 6 feet of the existing building and thus are one sided trees and
may not be very attractive when placed in an open site as planned.
• The trees will have a one-sided root system, consequently, they will have a higher than
average chance of failing after relocation.
• The prospect of moving the trees twice to keep them out of the way of site access for the
Serrano's project will substantially increase the likely hood of the trees failing to survive.
In evaluating the proposal of relocating ur replacing the spruce trees we consulted with the
landscaping contractor far the Golden Peak House project, Fitz and Gaylord, Ine., as well as with
other landscape contractors such as Arrow-J Landscape and Sabell's. They were unanimous in
their assessment that the trees would stand a less than fifty percent chance of survival if moved
twice and would not fill out on the bare side to become full trees.
�
f , �N � •
Page 2
Town of Vail
April 17, 1995
Please let me know if there is any other information regarding this matter you may need in
assisting you in evaluating this situation. I look forward to hearing from you soon for the
preparatory demolition work is presently scheduled to start on April 24, 1995.
Sincerely,
--__
Doug Thompso
Project Manager
�
.� yl�5195 �...� �
� " - -- � � -s � 8 :�:2 '��d,: °e� P.O 1
� ��;` t=:.��Rl•1 H'r'P�.� .�'�i�TFL1��1;Ii�1{�7i;3 ��:� 1j1� �il't�C �0 ��+ �
t� � ' �i��Pt�„Y�.. ..�: ..... .
i
. � �9��" 7
�v�'" � p � • � CJ�4 AF:Pa^ P'G�Sf,' T
l�� /�L�o� �- �i Li�3+.1 t1f1 'tii�iaLnl L�&:a,z&�.
7�e,a�� ��,/� p 5 � �::����,� ` r�� -•
�OI /_� I t�s�o at�x�:r::,�;.�• s
'i'A.,a�,�- . _ ./i n:„:��c r�: ~ A�D
�o'L r�� wcxwnt t3ur+�wr, t , �
/� � oi-0000-22o�i6 Mtsc.
I'r p�`V�Lt51��F`� Ih1f�i�GV�Mtdw1` �C��sE��tv�fit�t`i`
c��ry« �y�,;,
THIt� ��f�-����EdY, c9��:��7 gnd ent�r� inf� chl���d�y of 2SG t�s.��b;f
�t�d t.rrto�,- � Ltd. (h�r$?nrft�r C���th� "C7�rt�t,:,:t')� f:�1d 4h�7GG�1N
�i' VAlL (��r�a�r�ttft�r oall�� tt1� o��vn`).
WM�t��E3� t��.� lop�r� � p nd;t�dn at :.,n�rav� of th���S?��..:�..,, v5r�
ptat7�, dc,tv:����2� 1 V:�she� ta ent�f InIC a, b�vnlopar tmpro4���ri�nt �����,����m�1��
,�t':��m�nt; �n�i ,��'Jr
��h��. 7
VvH��;EA�, N,� �vvrlc,��r �� a:t'�sf� t� provl�c� ��u��iy'or ralic:t�rr�a r.utrlai�r,t ir� t �
�c�,i�m�nt Gf tt�� YoWn {n m�k� (esSdt5t�i0 pt�vlYtlr�nfl (GI'�.iYRi���c��tt O( �syt`L�.Ih ItttpYnV�t7t:YnCG
u�c r�r�r, c�«wc =:.�d
. . V,,�hF�N6cR�t, 1hb GavsJa�;.r w�Fx�c tca prowdw oocl�2�r�f t� �ur.rantoa p�nornanr� af
thi� #,�la:snlr:n� l��l�Ctl�{� ��n52YU3tt0� +�t t�� t�Ya•r�ir.t5�►::cd Imprcvr.�t:�tA by me�ur�� of ln�,
t0!lbVVin�:
O.�vi oqwr �r r��- te c:rta,blt�h rs ean�ti �fc�rit wit� 1h+`.'Y'own �f Vs�}! i�y �i aallat arn�L�nt
ct �• tt�� vt tna cor�1 n�zt ot th�wcr,�c c.ti�sn h�:.w) to �,'CVI�O `.��GUtIi}I
tar ihs VIN�4';n;;: .
1;�1�i�r�C:lJ����w;• ' .
.$ 36, $`��
, t�s��
---- �e� ;�:� , �s ' �-- �0��1 " o
— �� V'e��e-�u-�����, . � .� �(�, 0 52. 5—
ivOVJ� �`N���r�C�R:� fn �or�oi.���.tibh Cf i'r�;r {oll4Wt.� n�u��1 c�v�n�,naz :.►�
��r��r,��nt�, 4hci t�$vale�:r� �snd che �Coarn c�r� r;:w fol�;r��.�:
1_ 7h� C���.��►.:�:r i�tG:-�, s.#'tt�sot� rs,y;.t �:t� �.��.nrcas, i� (vrYti�h y.lf ��n�t►�r�t
ur,d r�,a�ta I�I i1�;t.::�c�,.���;s��rlbrnt ��� comp��tv r'.fi Im;x'G��r:�,n�,�►:€, crs ar bRt�r�t
�i1��..,,�.,.[.l� Yha t��v�-�CAer zh:.�t �amp;:�. (r1 =G::: :ti�rt:.m�r;l�:� m�rtn;;r� 411
impra;.���,��:f,t-,� �:a il:t:.d �:�t%a� {►ti ��ra�na�w�tn �N �il�h� ;�� ��cli'►t.�tlon� �il,�d !n ihU
attic� of tha �or��r�:�lty t�c;vs:lcpm�nt u�-,��rtm�nt, mc�7ovm of V+:il, �.yti icr da,�11 woYr<
In�ttS�t'�t�l th�eterib i��.:bra(�� t� ::.r�:f M �orrip:l;nCy titlfh thv{Oitt�,�a��t ,
�. t`stlul flthci t��a���1�. OfL•l�'1�1�K. fi'ti.45it� �j.rY',^.:rl.'.:.::i:Cns, :.�:S1tl1�aC� 1€,t1cl b�1�tf IY1&,itv!' .
�::+�:;�itta:i ay ti�� CNvGiCI.��z� b� s�r�v:�.� by ::+iy ai G"+v 530�':s•r�fvr�.n�w;�
r���cmm��li�1 �,�tizi�r. l��l S� �i'U:�: :.`►t.�{ r1� .'1�:?Ci�+ l%f�ik:-t':f'i�'s (:1L'N1�a�.i�GC1 Q{�� �P1�7
E� thd QY1:sf::::fGn Zf� ih'v �I��Ti't1 ���,Tln•�kiP� Efii�`Y'cWri �,;.;iF�it�� tilitCl:�1, o+ Gf'rt:.1'
cf4(�l�! frorrf 1�1�r 'fawn df V�f�� �.s tsit�Cte� t�y �:�cal�s! dlztrlctu at��tvtc� af�t�tct;i,
�, f�s�;c� r��a.;,--�tvW lrci��',rct nt�y e.�p�'� e.r,ct :h�N nat !w d��rr;u-d ccm�la#a ur►:;I
� t�;at3v`;,z s�-.� �ts�f.i:.3 :.�t aarn�,tr�tad by �r►� Y�wn Gt V�tl C��rr�m:�r�ity
G�v�+l�m�nt Ce��Atm�,�! ��rtf f��.-tlp ��,'arF� L��-=rtrr�.r.t. .
�. Yu ��c�ta�,nd ,4:.-��nk:a p:rfor�cn� of ka r,�i�,;.tl�n� E� �:f �o� �t�isin� :r�..
Drivol�a�� r.yf:u:: i�7 ptoVi:3i 4wc7i�riry► titid c�tlt.4wti�l �.3 lbllGivir: ,
w;:� 1 a P�
;. ii' .� ! jU' n�.� :'.; : �T �S� T� ,�<�H �;,'_E=.�:-�_�'�-?T': i]I it�I=�l•1HIdI� _ :3,�1 �U�
� . • •
- ..
i�U�:V ���F'h:rY�.'_��u 2� .���'hl H'(DF�R Cii,'�,S�T�tic:frc:�h{-,��� �J�s 1.39.a riN� '?0 '�3°� �3 :�c1 1�dr. N��� P _O],
' � �
.
• t7� p�Pfs Mt��h�'4T
L.++y�.i D.�tnra�nl Le�i�6,.
1fic:Y�vlivi�«.}.aVff'Ll r�Y
, l�i�t�Ct Y�z�tt:• , t S
�r��r:-�� v q�D
, , �+:sw�,t unt►►,�r,t�i��Id���s�
p�`1JI�Lt��'1�4� IC��1�5C�V�AA��ri1" #�C31�i��it��st�t� �I�
� oi-0000-220�6 Mtsc.
�C�s�yfR �t�Jiri
1rN1�3 �t&i�i � '�tV"►'� m�Cf�i #�r►�i �ntr�r�c1 Ir1t�► thl��,,,.�,,,�l�Y �pt Sl. 1�-�,�by�
�,��� ;�rr►��+ � s . (n�re�►nar�t�r oe��k�tti t,t� "G+�v�+�p�"}� c��,d �� YCswN
or� vxi� C��r�9n�tt�r+�s�tl�ti tt�t� ov�rr�`}.
vvt-���t , . rn� �i�v lo�r� a nr�don c�t ��a� �t th��S.?�3i _r��t���v5r�
��F�,�+ r��,t,�� 2�" y w;eht�u t� pnt+�� Ini� �, C�uv�to�se�r tm�r�nv�rr1bnt �i���3�l�dc�'�'►�l��vf'j
,�r�a�m��►�� �ars�i
�r�c�l'Z�Q7�/Vl�
WN�W�1��. #h� C?wval�aw la� qtsi�a,t�tl t�s �iruvit3� +�+p�Urfty qr esali�►t�rr�� auf�lat�nt in t »i
1c�:,�rn.�nt oi tn� 'ti'own tc� makv re�xonarayta� �snvvl+,�lc��w �pr at�m�sl�ic� �st +c�rr�lre �mpr�vqrrr+�r,}s
u;�t r��i� r��cl�wi +;�d
, . v�I�WNi��. ih�► IC�ev�la�r wt�h��a ta prctv�dw oa1l�t�r�s1 tr� �uar�trstr�a �rtarmanr,�ti �r
ttst�. .�rwsmr�ne� In�iudln� oan��ru�tion of �h� �bavw•r�H�'rn'w� tenprov�l�trl+ti�;t�y mee�r��a af Ir►a
fallnwirt�:
�rv+��«xr � r�►ra� tia ��a�rmri r��c��� �i+a�Cr�►R wit�r th+�'�own c�� V�,N !r� �+�o�iar �ma�;nr
a� . (iSt#S'�#,�oY ti�e tutn! ac��1 s�i�h�w�f� �1'tcti�trt ls�taua) t� �rnvtd��u�purity
'1oY fhiS {4G44711'��j:
ln����v��rt�' ' ,
.# 36, $��
---- � �r�, I c� w • ��s ��
e � x
�S �/` ��'�'l
—_ {�� Y'���e,�t-Fi��. , , � �b, 05�, 5;
�t3V�t� �`H��i�I�'�+�i�� tn rzan�i���h �t'##�,� fc�ife�vtt� miut�u�i ������int� scr�i
��r�m�rr�t�, Ei-,r �i,►�It�� �nd tha 1�rrwn �r�ra ,�a 9�lwv�w:
ti_ 'fh� fG�uri►t�p�r�;re�aaw, �i'!t��af� cstt�t �ci ��a�w�w���, i� Pur11(�H �.1t �u4�r',�c�nt
twrid r�,�t+t� Itil �t�,t�ty� Y�-�'ii,P'Idrnl t1f?t� oort►pl�tra Y1(1 Itrt�C�v�Ti�tJl'.g� ofi tsY��tt?rar►
�.�_u,��,�'.,,./ 4 Yn� [��vtil0�+�r �t'r�l� ��m}ri�t�. li� ��tri:.�:vorice�r�t;l�t� m�ti�1", �1't
(C11�It6V�i.Cfi�.►iiri � 11�i�vs�i ii��4'�� {►1 �r��i�n��wit� �►11 �f,�1� r�t'`�I��lii�tl�r� 411,�d Its �th�a
afiila�a t�t thw �Co�'t�taJ�fty �`+t►+�:l�rn�r�t i���t�tm:�nt, tti�7'�w�rt +Ort V�31. �!'td t�s R� �tN W�ifk
}���«,.ric+�l +��arr�� i�a�c��iin� te a�r�rf Er� �c�rripli.�nd��Itf� kh�iqClr�in�r
�, �u�i� ntin�'�,��►���. ar�a�;�n��. rri��. ��pc1�i�,�ir�n�, �k�t�i��, r�nc� �m�r rr��r��r
��triltt�b�tii� i�wvwl�f�P f� ��r r�+�v,��,��y ar�u t��3v;��r�t�r�rtt�.w�i
qa�r�smrrY��ir�J a��ntfU�9. p1i n+al�i�rt�►�i t.�ir�ll i�+�rl�na� tar'ri��tY�� lrs�;:�tIGi1 ��� �;���
tG ch�r i�:�tGif�c��+l'M e,T� thi. '1"iiwrl i�►�Ir�.is�3r, �+e�1t`i��t �t,�iic9ir��t ����Ir�l, t�+ ut'rt�r
ofllGi�l f�^ar�i t�t� �"awf� #�C V�,Il� �x i�if��t� I�y tap�l�t dlstrt� C����rvfc�dlssG�t�t.�.
.� gn�lr r�e��ttvr� tr�i�tr�i rit� ��►�r► �d �h�.ti nnc lrs�d�rrs� oamp�lc�#t� unfil
+�+;�r��r�i s�i ��+ar,i �r ����� �e�d t�y r+►�r Ya�w�� e�� V,�ii �i�rnmunit�
tr�v�tr�m�nt p�+p��r►t�t �r�d �i�nft��v�ari� Ga��rtm;�nc.
:�. Yc� ��aur��n� �u�,r.�rrr�� �rt�rm�r�� �t � �����Ic��� �� �.� ���t k��►�in, ttc,�
l7av�tc�cr :.;���rr� i� �yr��,:� �,�ur�ry �rr� c�ti�.ta�r�.l +� foUt,w�:e ,
���s 1 z���
;'_ �=i" .� �' �f i:i� �'(d ,_"�. : �I �f=� ; T�': ;�;�N f;�_'f��'=-'�'_.J--b T' : iI I �H I��h�!H f'I i�i :'::3.�1 ��_1�
' . • •
. ,,
-C!7t,1�; t�'�`,:n��.�`��.�..��;-��cr1•1 NfD�F2 C,��'�7RUCTI��I�,��3 P.,�S 1'�1:� P.f*� ��'c�5 g : 74 lvo ��� � . �L�
)
. . �
A c�.�tt dn�a��t v:ccnt�nt tn th� trn�aur�z c�t tg '�f,�s 2 S° t� �,� h.t�t �y �� �'cywn, �
t��+arcr�t+c.gr�nc,.ah�►ti �trovir�at th��+ac�rf�y �t�v�r„� improv�Om�nttt r�l tarlh �aRiovo lt Et��t'� !�
�t�f�f�iti Ur'�y�P ittb/�t4s��t�`riitlt�?Y L���l�e�r. �
3, !'h�3 C3�,va1i+1�+�rrtaY a,ttt�r�y �tm�Y�tsb�+iitutm#rt� Cc�II�E�! t�►�tj�It1�€#y i�r�� Fattit
� ��vw t�t �olr��rr 1�rm raf �t�llc►ta��l wc�a.�+ptnt�icr io thca 'Yawrt sc� au.�l+�r�i�i� th�4 i#�thtu{
r.orrt�l�tl�r� c�f ti�a�w Impr�►�morlta rt�Ir�r+�d t� h�rrsrrit� �n� tf�a �dt�rmianc�a ot t�►� idrrr5s� r,f rr�i�
A�r�r�m�r+t. �uotl �C��Y�tr��:+ by/ �rt� 7"�rwn Gf r�l{�r(1r.tivsi �riU�E�rra! chatl b� �t#C��'r'own'� �bi�
� ttc�r�twtivr�. ' ' '
�. 7hv�'�vvn �h�il r��t, n�n� �ph�ill anyVa�tt�+�r ar �tnploy��a th�r�at. b� Il�i�► r.f
r��c�nrtk�I,W r�ar �ny z�ca�swnt� f�ur t�cirtm�e�hry���nninp t�r OCGUftln� ta ttle ti+aoeK ssp�nitl�rd !r�
thi�s �qr�r�rr�c�n� pCldr (a t�►�s r.om�it�ti8n a►r�d �cc�pta,�cc� 4f tnw ��,rn�, nnr �h�ti tii�'C�wn, r�ar
�rsy ottlat�r or �tnploy�+� tner��, b�r Il�+at� for�nY p�r�tana Or pro}��rty inJur�d b� rmautc,rY ot th�
nntur�a nt un�ld work, kaui t3►II'af Qs�lt!ti�!lRl�e� ��u t �n� �r� he�rcitay �soum�d tsy t�t� �5�av�ln��r,
7h� t5r�yvrilu���� ftr�r�,by �r�e� t�s ft�d.rftrtrtty �►nrl hqld �i�1`f1l��� ih�w Yo,wn� �u'1d nn}/ of i►�
aftln�r�. �����k� �nc� �m�l��a�� ��►n�i�sny te���, �i�rr►�� cl�m�aG��� ar It�#I(Itla� ta w�r��a�r �r��
`t'�wn dr �y nr Itr c�itlo�r�, �d�t�t� nr �m�idy�ars�s rr�v t���omc� �ukaj�at t,�. frt��tar u� r,ny �uat�
itSi�a��� c:l�:ir��, d�►n����� c�r 11�ibfllt{�� �t�P i�btlK�rt6� In C���5a3�t th�a'�bt) th�i 5rrj�i� uut r�t qT,��r
b�o+�d ups�n +any pt�rtQrm�,r�c� rsy tha �Wc�ln�r�t �i�tJhL9�r: �,nd th� b6va�la�r�11�l1 t��mpiJY�r�C+
t{ti� `1'�wi1 tur r�ny�in+��,Il t+1�i! Gf oth�Y+�x��n�6`��rr�G?(i�71y inGUfrri�i i�y 1t1� 'i OUVn It�
t�Grsntr�itd�M vvifil lrtvoi�tl��atlr�g or d�f�ri�ing t�n� �uc�h� 1���, cl�lrrr� d�rnz�D�. IittblH.~,t t�r �ctlrsn.
7'hl;� (n��rrrnity pr�vlr�lar+ �h�l d�lr5 �dltt�r� td �ny.+�lh�� l���if�ty� wh1�K ti�� �r�v�YO�cs� rr►�,y
h�v�, , ,
� n. i� (� If�111i13�1y' fY�ltti+� tl��S ih.r L7vrVVrr10 " f tY'1ffiY ci��lY ki3 it1�TSLWt'1 i�it'+� �lt �'o�v,�
alia�li �uth�atixa tor pairt(rrl ra1��n�af tw�+� e�nit�t�l �a�►ii�rd rwi� th�7'ovvri�oY��ah ts���ry
cst Irnprovqm;3ni �t �uah �Im��as ��t�h Im���rr►�tttt� �t��r c�n�k�ot�ct irt �pi��,r�ar v�atth �,it
pl�Wl'1il �t1c� +���iNr,,i3,Upft� �.9 t�si�r�ric�d h+�t�ilCtd�f �u1d ��l�d �ey ttiq TCtyVt1. UCidY+l`it f��
vunc�ctan wfiU th� amau��t c}t tr�p tr�ifi+cs�tKl tnr►t!r q�4r�p hr►td ksrM rw'tiuc.r�d taals�wr��ht+ nxi'�c►ur�r
n�r�c����r�ry fi� ��mptt�t� �t�cl� Impr�yvrmgrif�. �
�s. ��tF�w"r'Urwn ��R�;rrt�ttln�ttimt� e►+sy c�l uia lntpr�vam+�rtts� co�st�n�st��.�;ci h�r+rin s�r�
' r��i �nw�ru��ai+� iri �,�rn�ll�,nc� v�lf� �i� pirrn� �ru{ a:���t{�:tqn� ��t tatth h�t�t�t �►y tt��►x�t� +��;t
lot1h fn �r�r�tt �, �ttp'1'ciwri m�y, k�c�t r�hr�ll n�t t�o► r�ulr�f tC►, wlm�r$w tr�srv, thr, r��ch
���v��t �u�tr tun�� � m�y �� n�c����ry io cc�rr,�r�t� tr,� ur►i�r�r�,��d irr�r�cw�n��c�. �t r��
ir..w►n �t�t1 r�f��� �,�t�h iu�►d� uq�tr 1t;+�wrlrt�n r.+q��:�t c�! t�r� �t�tt'�i ur� ��n°+munit�
�i�v�i�{rm�ni d�p�rtm�r�t �t;�t{�1� t1�Wi th� h�iprtw�iv��nir� h�r�r r�t�t k���r� cam�f�t�ti �t� r�ufrr�
b9+ fn� �gr�r�rr��nc. �"F-��7cr;�s� ��tl ���r�+aulra tha�ntwrr�lca at th�d�r�lc����rtar t� th�
rnl���s bl lh�c �und�, n�ar�th�il t��r 'e"�mrrr t�a� rac�uie+�d te►v�rity lrr�p�n�a�n�ly th��t c4rm �
im{���i�rYy��1q hrsWc� r��t bi��n �7GCnp�ti�t1 � �'rqut�v�d by ti1t�It�r�t�ment. 6Ut�1x3! r'�Yi�,w��r �unh
to�r.:�: ��f�ly t;�n tti;� t�zqu�i.t �t t�rt� Clt�t�nmu�t�ly L3r�-ti�110�tii+�t�t C7w�xau'tm.�t�t.
(i f��W �t��i,� trt r�t3r��si�tf�c� Ci��r w�irK .�x��zi �h� �t�r�qu�Yt ���i�� C#�tilt, ti�� �.xct�a�,
tag�tri��:�•a+�f7 trlt+,r�.t�a� tvwrl�w� p�i��f �ir �,n�-�u�, �t��+11 b��Il,�� �tn�1 t�►r�IPs'n�r►�ty+ �ncl
rrrray a+r cr�,►1�ttt� by clvif �uit or m��t b�asrilCt�d t�i�h� �r�rr ot��t�Ccrtt�rty ia b�
c�al�ot�,a (r► �tt���►rn+a rr�pt�n�r t��it�1M��u�r�f�i�v�l�r�► t�a� l�ui�d ��ino�t �u�t µrR�j��vrtv. It
t�i� p�rn�i� ri�ld,�r i�l� or w�e�ua�o� ta a�tr�sl�t� rci��We��r»up�nd l����in�. �r�dr�fin� l�► thi�
ch�,pt�r� �UCi1 t�titur� Or r�1Wi��ni i�h�.il b�t qGn3�idt�l�^C�'KVlol�tti�r� +af'th� ��n��� �rlcv.
�. 7itrr o�y�SiK?�;�r w�tte�nit� �,U wd1-k t�`r�l rtt3�t���l! t�r � �rior;l �i Crt'o� y�rs:At �ft�.r
�+�,�t�n�a �,� �Ii wr�rk+ti�f��rw� tr� itt ti71r �r��rnwht t�y ih� 't'�wi� pur�t��t�t t�, r���tiqr�
'��'.1�.��0 lr +�u�t5 warK i� f���ki�d ar� �`�trt �f�(�rll p�rpp�rry,xer w[thc{n TnLVt�,4t V�tii rl�tit-c�C-W�y-
�
�. `I"fI+A µ7iPtlC��l hOwtliS� h1Uttlilitly �'W+i 1��it I�I& �Cw�wPYl+�rlr 1r1d� ki� 1dtYl1btld�&Cr (Yt7Cn
bre►� irr ttmc�, �rovldstf that nuah �m�sn�im�rt�t i•b�o'Ir�;W�Itlnq and r�koaUt�c►t3 by �1! p,tr�lww h�uPt�CtS.
G�ta�rl in�r dsr,y iiLrid y�idt titwt�Ybpv�wrtit�Ct� '� '
� ,
i"d�jtt=uF 1S1
'_!:! ' ,� �Ti=,' op,l '�I : �T �t_�; T'_ �.�H Fc'_.�,�=-'�'�-bT�=.: i1I �HI"�PdHI�,aI� `�'>�;�1'-!C��
. . e •
. ..
7�7W�� Ci�p�,.�rN..�y�,�,l��=�F(�� NYLiEf� r5';��T�i�l�".TX��rd 3�3 8�� 13].� FiF'Ft �4� '�5 � �'�5 (Va f�3� � .0�
�
, �,�►���'�'�'�`-..c�'�-,�'�,�` �'
♦'�. f J M �iF`'�Y+�F fL �f r_ �`_"�'��_,.� .
�:',r,�-� i�i���-�.��� " J; G rr.�.i��',��,
t�tiYX7'�' CJi"'�� � �'�rt.�r�l rDsE����
i��-;�� ) fifi. .
�'i�U�� 17f� Yn,'�t �
� '�'h� iGY.�aSr►{� f�t�v�l��+r ta r�v+�n��c�t r�r��nv t wj:,a �ct� ty��° ��:i antr�trr m� tnl�
�1�r�..y +�� *',c.'��t y�+.�bY ��'�j� �„ �/r�.z/ ��►-�r
t1V1'tv1�.�►� n1y hs�n�4 �tr'+�I qtt}tzi�!tu�iaal. ;i`
i�xy��srr►r�i���or����r�:,.�,.....�:� ,�J ry'� 7�' 1�` J,
�' r�' '� ' �f��/� f`���f��{� i`�
�,(cx,a,�.i%,_� .r ci _.....�
n1C�taii�t P'Ubltiti
�xtrmmn`u� -
��.°�a, AN�JIE r�. Mllt��i
��
Nnte�'1 Pu�ic,$1�tr u<<a�at
" hty 4ommiu(ot+Ewi��ias 12•31•9n
,.+�
" o� �
�° �����. , � � �� � {��t�� ��+I��i�Y
i�rli�� �l" �`i�l..�'✓���(�' ) , .
� �3ru.
C3i�Ufi�fTY C3Y E:iti�L� )
�� `1'h� fe,:Q O�ny�,1��Velo�P Irr}��+v�rtrun�a�yr�� �rp,� � awl�e��e�r! hacAr+► m�r thls:
e;ay �sf 'i�,��y.��----�-�� ., C.%��.... .., «,
w�1rr,��� my r�aurrci �d oht�t �r,J.
� �' /�9�'
Pv3�' �r71�i�551y+ittia►� �x�r+uw:,��%;���� `
%
�d�� �µ���i�
k.,.,.».si in+fvrs
w fr✓ , '
t�:t:
_� .
;� -
„ � � `✓�`r,J
'* b
�-��;, i.� .
r'r
« .. ' �a��Y��i��
:/'
1'i=!� :� ,' "lC�' r�Pd t�T � �I_ �!�: T? ;�;�H t� _t;'�—'���—�' [,_': iII iHI_ir,�Np,�T� �=:_;�,:�1 �Ci�
. - • •
� YDE
CONSTRUCTION INC.
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
VAIL, COLORADO
APRIL 19, 1995
BACKFILL AND REVEGETATION
DESCRIPTION LAB4R MATERIAL SUBCONTRACTOR SUB TOTAL
GENERAL CONDITIONS $1,000 $325 $150 $1,475
BACKFILL& GRADE $0 $0 LONGS EXCAV. $30,400 $30,400
LANDSCAPING $0 $0 FITZ 8� GAYLORD $2,415 $2,415
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
SUBTOTALS $1,000 $325 $32,965 $34,290
SALES TAX $13
$0
BLDRS RISK INS $74
PERMITS $250
PLAN REVIEW FEE $163
SUBTOTAL $34,789
ADJUSTMENTS +/- $0
SUBTOTAL $34,789
OVERHD 8► PROFIT $2,053
SUBTOTAL $36,842
BOND $0
GRAND TOTAL $36 842
��
_ � �
"�r�. � � - �
�
,
1020 WEST FIRST AVE.DENVER,COLORADO� 80223(303�825�1313)•FAX(303�825�3223) CONSTRUCYI'I(x�T jNC, �
April 19, 1995
Mr. Jim Curnutte
Town of Vail
Office of Community Development
75 Fmntage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Golden Peak House Redevelopment
Dear Jim,
Please review the attached estimate dated, April 19, 1995, for the grading and re-vegetation of
the excavated site for the referenced project. The estimate is based on the drawing by Land
Designs by Ellison, Inc. dated, April 6, 1995.
As you are aware it is not our intent to have to follow through with this work. We do, however,
understand the Town of Vail's assurance of remedy in the event the project is canceled after
demolition.
Please let me now if you have any questions or need additiona] details regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Doug Thomps n
Project Manager
.-, . ��
.,__��
��� '.• r `` �
- �PR Z 4 1�'�
T�� � ��►s�;�Vl� �J���� �:��.
�
- , . . • �
� ���
. _ _ . .�.
_ . ,
" `,�-
-� TO W N O F V A I L RECF,[PT NO.
=r� ---- -------
� ///���
� // UR.PAR7'h1EN'P O'CODIAtUNfI'Y llI:VEWPMF.iV'1'
— �� /' _ � -
NAME - G/�
J / ''
a. �`{� -�� [/J/�� 1 � %/'] Ss:
� AUUN►,t�i�_ �/�'�, v L � �
llATF, � �
s : ,� /�
'�'.5. PROJF,CT— --- ��L��� ��.� -
1���
��� � CIIN:<'KS MADF.PAYAI3LF,7'O'POWN OF VAIL
o� ACCOUNTNQ . ITI�,1�t No. "TAX CO5T�A. < ' TUTAL ' �y;
� 01 0000 41540 ZONING AND nDDRl;ss Mnr�s *
$5.00 �'�'
" Ol 0000 424 1 5 UNINORM BUILDING CODI; * `�'-�
�54.00
�:'' 01 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUM131NG CODL' �3y.00 * ':;�:
''� 01000042415 UNIFORMMIiCII/1MC/1LCOD1: $37.00 * ��
.� Ol 0000 424 1 5 UNIFORM FIRI;CODI; $36.00 * �
't 01 0000 42415 NATfON/�L I?LL'CTRICAL CODI: $37.00 *
" 01 0000 42415 OTIII;R CODI: 13OOKS * ,��
",�q',::
;y OI 0000 41548 131_Uls PRINTS(MYLnIZS) �7,0� *
=.� Ol 0000 42412 X1:ROX COPII;S $0.25 *
�=�= 010000424(2 STUDII;S *
z,�� Ol 0000 42412 TOVFI;IsS COMPUTLR PROGRnM $5.00 * :.�.
�� Ol 0000 42371 PI;N/1LTY Fl?l:S/R1:-INSPI;CTIONS
='.' O1 000041332 PLAN RI:VIJ;W RI'-CI11?CK 1�1:1? $40 PI:R IIR. �y�
'`; O1 0000 42332 OFF I IOURS INSPGCTION Fl;I�,S ^`
'',''; 01 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICL'NSI:S FI;I:S
' 01 0000 41413 SIGN nPPLICnTION FI?I: $20.00
�- Ol 0000 41413 i1DDITIONnL SIGNAGI? F1?1? [51.00 PI?R SQ.FT.] �:�
:' Ol 0000 42440 VTC ART PRO.II:CT DONA'i'ION ,�;
�: O1 0000 41331 PRI: P/�ID D1;SIGN RIiVII;W [30nRD Fl:t;
a4x
:- 01 0000 42371 1NVI:STIGnT10N FI:I; 13UILDING) �y�,
x 31 0000 451 10 TOV PnRKINC; FUND �
T�, 01 0000 22027 TOV M;WSPnPI;R DISPI;NSI',R FUND �
`� * O1 001111 21112 TAXABLE a).4% (STA'I'E) �,�
� * O1 0000 41010 TAXA6LE(d�4% (TOWN) ��
a;'::' 01 0000 42371 l3Ull.DINC' INVI;STIGnT(ON `�='
�04� OTI11?R '"`�`
.
� PE APPLICA'I ION rEGS ;,;,�
�� 01 0000 41330 ADDITION/1L GRH/� "251)" $200.00 •�x'
�:
�; Ol 0000 41330 CONDiTIONnL USI?PL•'RMIT $200.00 ;>:
,. 01 0000 41330 I;XTI?RIOR nLT1;RATlON [LI:SS TI lAN 100 SQ.FT.] $200.00 �k
;�.,- 01 0000 41330 I:XTl:RIOR nLT1:RAT[ON [MOR1;Tf InN 100 SQ.FT.] $500.00
��: O1 0000 41330 SPI;CIAL D]:VI:LOPMI;NT DISTRICT [MiW] $1,500.00 �
'� Ol 000041330 SPI;CInL DI:VI'.LOPMI?NT DfSTRICT [Mn.IOR nMl?ND] $1,000.00 �
�,. O1 0000 41330 SPI'.CInL DI:VI:LOPMI:NT DISTRICT [MINOR nMI;ND] $200.00
�, Ol 0000 41330 SUBDIVISION
-�» 01 0000 41330 VARIANCI: $250.00 wM
;' 01 0000 41330 ZONING CODL nM1:NDMI:NTS $250.00
;a'; 01 0000 41330 R1:-ZONING $200.00
OTI(I;R
OTIII:IZ
TOTA L:
COMMBNTS:
,
�:
CAS� I 1 CK�+L � ��_]M.O 1-1 RCC.I3
�. —
LAND DESIGNS
BY ELLISON, INC.
l00 �.BEAVER CREEK BLVD.
StTITE 220
AVON, GdLORADO 81C20
� � �
��� ����
_�� �.�,�� .
�_�
�� _____.�_ p.o. �o� Izs�
1
� ' AVON. COLORADO 81620
P.t7, BOX 2C'7'7
VAIL_ GOLORAD4 81C��
��'"�- . �
(3�03) 9�9 - �7��
,. w �AX: {3Q3) ��9 - 3288
,�
�
�
�
�'
------f �
�°W �w�ir
�
�
/ �.
/ l
/ ! �
' �, '
�
Y , �
:.a--->
��
�
/
� �
�_� ;i'
� �
�° ----
� --- ��
_�. .�-
� �'
_ �
�� �
�`
�
..
__R----w---,.�.-�
. �
.�.r--°`�°:..-M `
_ � �
�-���--- � �- ��
�� � ��+� �
� i ''~-�.._ ,__�_.-! � �
� ��� �
_ � --'' � �.
4=� r �� C�
`� � �..�.
,.� �
. ���,�
�# � �
' �
..
__�-.
`� � � � � ,,���� � � � � � � �
� � � �� � � . �� ""
,,�'` �CS �t�
° �-� �i�"� �� ° � �1"� t�:.- � ��i�I�i� ,,,�' �./
t �`�,, �`� �,��� ����i�l �'t�� � ��-r � � ��' �� �
1 �'� ��c,.� ;�i�����...���' ,.� i I �-- .�
� �,�-�-� �� ��. '' � �,..-x` �,.�' v° �� �
� �' � ,
`,�-�� ���� �-�'r-�B �-�� ��� ��'�� -'� '�
� � � �� �
`��. �_ �� ���� ��� ` ` �i,t��.cy.. �:`�., --,°�� �
Z��� � �I �'-���-t�- "�`"`""��.. -.�.�-- --e.- .�" .�'' ��"" �` .1'� �-' �'� � �
=Q�.� �'a�`�h'��� � � . .�.--�''�
C��� �i�`��"� � `'� -�`� '� ,�.�'
�� � � --�..�_. � �._..�-�-° ' ,,-°°' �,---
��,�� .,.. �,.-- �,r ,�-' ��
�_, ��-1��' ��� � �/ ����.��, ,��� x ���/ � �' ��-' �
�
.— <-��;;}�' �� �i�, `,, r�,-' ��
, -� �,�-- f,�,--
_,f�-- i�����. l��{'� ��-�=- ���� 1�� �'' ,�..-�°
�.
-� � � �; �,,-"�'`- �>>'r;;,,-,- :�
� ...�._-�--- � �..--- � �
r---'` .�''�
�
��.. .��„�,.�.. �
�� � �
--, .�,``' `..�-'`� �� :.
1� �,,•�` �,,�' �� � ` �
, ._.,.�,...... :.�. ...,.. ,,,_,,,
^f ��- � ��
,�' �-- �� ---�-"" �. ,�.,.�.-�» �,,�
�"�µ v
_ _ ---�---.�.� � _
� : � ,, �'`'`` � �` ,�.~-� U��-
� �
-� � '.; ` � M`°"`.-
�/ �� � � ��
, . , . _
� �r�'" .. ,
. Y . .----�`
. . .!' . . . . �� f�x �� . 4 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .�. . . .... ..�� . . . � � . � � � � ���-
. . � �� � �� .. .
. .r . . . .. ... V. . .
�L. (n.
. �-- ��....� �� I �
� � �
DATE. ��`�
.�- .� �'� �
.�'-
..-
�
`,'�' --�-
� .,�..,,n�.
��
� �
�-- . � �
�
,� _
�
` � ,
_ ,� � . .
___.----- _
rv______�_ ,, t
.�.-�- ,
v �.. �--
� �
�
� �
`�,
ss. '
� � �_ �- �
.. _ _ N� � .�-°�,
��,
�
� � �
� i � �. � �
.,: 3
�� g ;F. �/`'� .�` �'�' �,�.� ---°°'" °`' ,/`i REViSIQNS:
/ / �''� �. ---`" �„� -�~''`"� -'`'f �;
,% � .�-�"° �,,.,,- � ,�
1 --°� --' °
��,,,� � I.� �.,-� � .�-! �.�-- .
�, �j�.� �,,,�f�-�° �� .�- ��
� � .��,. �-`' .�- �_..�.--" �,,,� --�
�� � �� � �.,.._ -�-- -°-"_" �
,
'°r� � -�� �� "-�° � ��~j . �- � � �
� ,�''� �-,�" /�� w�- �/ ~�'�� rv ° -
,� � ' -�° ..---' �' � ;�V��t3�T";��►"T 1 t� :
� �
�/ � , f. �. � � �!L..A�1t
�' � � �`°�� � � �
�` � � � �
°`� � �, `� ```.�� -�,.,—r°'
\ ``� �` � �`�
,,,�-- �-- —�- —_- � '� ``� ' °
f `�� ��` .
��-- �..�-- .___.. .�-�-� '`d �,,,� �r> :
..�-�` # �
�---- �-° .°l' �„°
.�--°'"""°"��. ��`°""�'---°°V°`�" '�°� �.�----° �� (
{ 4
._.�.-. -' �'" t
}k � -"
j �...__---°""`...---•-°� PI2t7T1:CT NUMl3}�R: �
�----� ���_`�'�
� . SC�LI::
���
�I-IT:3.`T: ���
_ _ . __
_ _ _ _ ,:
�,
• i
�°�� �
, ���
�
M�y
TOWN OF VAIL �
75 South Frontage Road Depart�ne�it of Comntuniry Developrnent
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138/479-2139
FAX 303-479-2452
December 16, 1994
Mr. Craig Snowdon
Snowdon and Hopkins Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
RE: The Golden Peak House redevelopment
Dear Craig:
On December 7, 1994, the Design Review Board (DRB) unanimously (by a vote of 5-0)
approved the final design for the Golden Peak House redevelopment. Congratulations!
The final DRB approval did carry with it the following five conditions:
1. That the previously discussed rooftop unit (chiller) has now been eliminated
from the design.
2. That the developer agree to come back to the DRB for review and approval of
a sign program for the entire building.
3. That the developer agree to come back to the DRB for review and approval of
the final pfanter design, which is proposed to be located in the skier access,
along the western elevation of the structure.
4. That the final design of the exterior mechanical equipmert, which is proposed
to be located on the south side of the elevator tower, be reviewed and
approved by the planning staff.
5. That the applicant consider the use of stone, as a base material, around the
perimeter of the building versus the use of the vertical pavers.
If you should have any questions regarding any of ihe above, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 479-2138. Again, congratulations on your final DRB approval.
Sincerely,
�V� / �I c-�-�-�
Mike Mollica
Acting Director of Community Development
i ! • •
!�� �� 9� ��� m-- ���
_.�.�
�r��-r�v� - � G��;�.�.� - ..�ti�-�-� o�?��
�� �
.�p �
� GC�..� �Lvcic� � .'���'� iZ� ��-0^'2� �—
�l'� „^�� ��/�-�' ` ��ivi/`�( L'&A�'Y-2 i��17�+iF
�=-�-�- �� " x �o �� X '�r J
��� �
-- s � - G2=��-� �--� ���. j �z
_ (V. _ 2�.-r`� .d .t-� /�rr ,��✓�2.�` i',°�
. _ �p .�/" /
G�C /� /2�� �� irow C%`n�
i�l�z. 0'1-� � — .�/�`�`
�
^ � ��t��i�`� �C/�� ��� �''_�l /,�
— �• -- /J�.e-�l w/ /r�^� i?�C� -�?`;�z� � ��C,
- • �--� - '����� c�� '"
�0�� �r.�„-�` �
GPic-QU,-d� /� ^ .
!�
�- �-- .� �.-�' �� � �� � ,
- �l��. - � �� ���-� � �.e.�� �
��� �- ti� �� .
.
_ � �,��.� � ���-C -��-
______--- _�_d��- ____ _ _
T3dG A-�.- ..�r� O�o�C — a� 1�%� ��-°�- ..��-- �-� a�- �w-e
�d��- Q�� � � �-�.- a-�� �� ���c-°�-e-.. �.�-e
�� --� � ��� ? � ?
�� � - � --�
f�� - ! � �!� �e .�� - �'
c� �-��-� o�- �'u��y� Si�. -- /7��
v
� ��
— i2�-�2 � � � a2- .��
G�ti� GvQ�G� �
��.�� — ��.e�f d� �.e�, -- Pa� ca•w�-e .�.. 4 K � ��°—�-� . �-e. .
�- 1�� y�� � �,
� � �
�
G��,;- --> 7.� o-v�--e - �. � �..� •
_. _ _ _ _ � �=�,._.�-� �,�!'�;�,� � .
� � �� �� �� �
_-_ ._
%�
/�j �I ', ,, I.�.P�>t`
C.% �ti���
1
V �
i2�'�a`� �'L?�v-c:P.w lZ,�� ;�s%�Q
l� � ' s2��-� !� ^
�
�� � �a2��
Z �� -- .S
Q���
(/�- _ s �
�
��
, �
+,�
Ir
_._......_ ...s. . _.__.. �� - . .
.. _ ..-. . _ . . �� - _
E
j:� . .
!
� .
. � � �
���3 : l r � 16. ��- ��,.. �� �� � �
- �� s��
. ,�� �
• s� ����-�=��
�s -.s.�:�. �- � �:�t� .w��
�
s� � � �� . ����, ��� � ^ -�..-� ,�-�'
- �� � � � �� .�� ,�.�� aK
��
w� �� �.��,� .
� S �x�-e - � �a�:j-�.{ ��" a-�,�e �� �.../
c
i� — d��.w� (/f� � %�� /�i-�r�. -c.,-• i�'�2 .
— �y,e�+� .[.�d' O�'` .I�C. � •
s
- ��� �-� s � ii�� . - ���-�` d� ,�.
��
.�:t� /�2� a�-� ��e�2. �7`. �
/ �
- J� � - �d .,� _ J
r�-�~�
� .� .��e�.-� ��i�, �3� x 3' x � ��
� � ���-Q,
� a ���-°��. _ ��.�= P�C � ?
��� �
-� C
�� �
D � ��-�',,� _ ,�,-. �� � µ'�°''- �-
�'�°n- � �;� ��=�.
�o'�.�— — �c�..� ��„�,.�-�e.. ���°�e.� �j x � X�� ?
/
� -�� ��°-���. - �
lU� � �
��.e.-�.� �- 69��. �- �-,.��
� .�.� q,�. a.wr�%� �12r o�-Z��
�
3:/!Z ��t�(/c2�`�/,,,,�A �2... ���.t,.�,�.
!
�,
, �v • •
l__/
_ � /�/�� p /�e� Q /
- cc�.�„�,( ��.. .�.�.�..�--� � �.�,, , � .a�,4�.
_ �►--o�.�,-. _ � ���
�:►� , � _ a�-.
� A wi .f.v� ' O�O�- �-��Z ) /� �/'�V�C�. - ��;�,✓
�rY-���4�
.�t�� 7 C�.e � � J
� a�-� �� ...����� �
, � � . ��� �� � } ���
��.
a „
_ 7-�. �� ,� .�� �����-�. �- a��
�� �
--- /��e�G� T'�' -- � �.
-.a���r c�G-L
��� - � �- � �, �� , - � �
. ��
� � ��� �
- ��- � ��. - � s�:�,� ��,,.
�- ,e�,--�,►�a,�-�.� I .C�,�` .�,�e
� �
�+�'-C.e�a�►— ! C�r,--�.— �. �
s��e,,_ - ��-G� ���1 .��.e� _ ��.,,.�;.�, ��,,, �
D" _ .�,-. .�.�.�. 7
���� ���
�- ' � �� - �►-� ,� �
���
a�,►�,� '��. ��� � � .� ��P„
r�a,M. - C.��� a� � .vl. � ��;�. .
- ��� � .�;�'��. ���. ? ��, ?
`�� — �oa- o��o-ee — G�a�. o-t er-e �e o�-� Go'�!u�.�. ?
��
y Q�cnTe�v:� ��1�-t��-� � lNa�.2 �t��,ti�,��-�+-'g .
✓ O 7
etnwc-� 4�^^-� .D�c�-2 �2�/8' �� � .�jas,t � '�%�� c
�
���
�' ' � � �
� �/ / �� D ,
ff U' � 7 ' o.- �� �� /�i�,. ,,,�/ d.�f
— -.G�^� -y- .rrP.� .r��.�` — ,�:�' � .G�.—.��1 .
A,t,Y.2�i -- �. ,,._/ ° p�arL
l
�� ,, �c a�,�liD-w�C. ;c,�e�`.�� i1��-t G���� �L:�%��
�z I,
- �� ,d�� �c. .� � � .�� �
.� ��'�' ' w ,�- �- .
SNOWDON AND F�'pKINS �oe��
ARCHITEC�.�- BHEET NO. OF
201 Gore Creek Drive
VAIL, COLORADO 81657 CALCUTATED BV� OATE b •
(303) 476�2201 CMECKED 8Y DA7E
HCALE SG '
I � � . i ' � . . . I . � � ' ' �. �,. � ��. . � ..
._ � ... .. �. . ..._ : . }.. . ._ _. . _ � ... . � ..
......._ :..... : . .:__ ; _ �hy��t�' HI��{t1 �.YaY't1� . .. .. :__
_ ....... ... . . . . .. . ;. __ : _ _ _ :. _ ....
.
�1 r�tir .
.. ._:. . ... : . . _._ ._ : . . . _ _
, .
.......:..... .. .....a... �. .�.. :. :........� ..... '. . . .�'� . ... . .�... ...... .1 . . ..... . . . ... , . . .. . .. ...
� . .... � . ..... .:... ..�..
!
j � • .. a. . ...._....' _._. '� ' � �
� : : ' . : ��. � � . . .
� l�� 5rct��}-aar : _ : . , , ...! ; :,� __. .
��5 __ _ _ . . . . . '
; _ ' _.. M
� ' . .._
.. .:........._ ,_ , _ : _ Q � :__ p p _. . . _ _ _. __ ._ .__.. : ...
. . .
. _ . ..: , , ' �
� ___ . a _ . . . . __
f , .. .. . .
.
__ I. ..._.__ ' ._
X ,
, _ _ __ : .
� ' ___.
. _ _ . � __ . ._ _ . . . ��. ...
� t
�� : . �� _ ..
�� ti ' � . _ _
__ :_ . . ;. . , _ _ _ .
�
_ . _� .
�
. _.
�
>
5h_ �v,�_: : . :. : . . _ .
_ .
.._ �'�n�l� :_ l . . . _ _ _� _ _ ,�.- _ . _�
. .
� _:_. . , : __ . . __ _ � _ .
. . _
� .. _ : _
Y . �•,� .. ........ ............ ��........� .....�.... . ........ i .......��. . � . .... . . . .
......_........... ..�... �, .......
,... � , . ... .... . , .
,
..... ......... �. ...:� .�. .. � y....... . ..,.. ;.... ,..... ;......,. ,.... . . � .... .. . .. .,.. .. .... .. . ....._. . .. .. ......
. �.
S
' �5_
_ _ _ . tht4� . �
� _�
_.. .
_.
� �
... :__ _ 0 0 �__ . o , _ � .�y,, _ __
,_ _.
�r
, _. _ . _.
_. __,
, _ _ __
. ,..... , .....0_ :. .....
..___ ,..
� ��
.........._... ......��.... ....... ..:...........:.. . ����:...... i._._ ...... � ........ . � . . .,.. ... _._ ._..... ..._ ......... .... .. _._. ... .. .
... . ...._.. .... . ..;. . �.. ._._.
. . .. _.. . . . .
° IGa� .S�IA�4r �'a'1 '
........;... ...;... .. ... . _: . �.... .. ; _ . _ .. . . _ _ _ _ _ . __._ . . ,
..:.... . �.._ �..... ..___ :.... . ._. . ;.. . .. _ __ . _: . ...
:
, :
;. .. :... ..i.. . , . ..: :
�
,
r.00urr m�i�xc�,r..owi
SNOWDON AND Hf)PKINS �oB-vO�-�w������`�-t--z������ '
ARCHITECT� SMEET NO. � OF
201 Gore Creek Dnve b �
VAIL, COLORADO 81657 CALCULATED BY DATE �
(303) 476�ZZOI CHECKED BY DATE
8CALE � � � 'D D
I ! i . i � . � � • � , � . • . . � �, , �. , , .
� �� �. . . I �. � � � '. . . . �
.._ ....t _; �. ..._t.. ._, . : .......G..._. ... .. 1. __.� . _ _ .
� 1
,_ ;
i � I : . �. � i .
� ! � � i ; , i �
: ; ; : ; �
_'a_._..�._�...........—i.__.......i............�. . .......e .... .. ...j. ...�.... . i....�. ..... . ..... . . . ..... .. . ..... .
..
� �
i �
� � 3 I , : � . � � ' . . . �.
�
�� r�1i_
,
____: . _._..... .... ... ... .. _ ,_ , G : . . _
� �t
. �
;
: ..
,.... ... ..i .. ...
, + : s . � , :
� :_ ._...� �. _ , . ..1�y , ___ : . , .
��� ;..
__.�-__..:_ _ . . _ _ . _
, �
�___...:. .. . _ . ._� . .. , . ._ .
, ... .
.,._
:_
a. � � . ..............� r..... �� � ,
. ._;_ .. : : - . �
.... ...i... .... .................. ..... .. ..'b.........a ...�:. .........� .........:... .. . � .
........F._. ._._.. ................... . ..... .. . ........ .... . . � ., .. .. . . . . . .. .. . .
...,.._.�. ..;....... .. .. .....
��
_.---.• �. _. . .. . .. , y�i. . . � . , .... ._ . ..
_.._...._._...:_.... ._........ ..... . : .. .:. ...........___.. ...........,� _. . ....... ... . ._ . .._...
.., . ; . . _.
.. ,...... . ;. .... ..., . _, . . .: . �7• ...:
� : ' �`
_.�._—�--___.......__ ..... ... .. . . . ........,.._.. . ....._ ..:... .. ............} ..... ,
... .. ..:. . . :... ; .. .. ... ,.. . . ;�
� G��I�V►�IYt � '
-- _ . , _ _ . . _ . . .
_......: . : . : � GOrh4af`� . _ . .
_ : : # rn�� � : _.
X�
� �
.
_��,,, . . �tr��
.. .
`�l, � + � _
__ ..... ......... . . . . . _ ,_ _ . , h��
� ; �
_ . _ _ _ .__ . _ . . . . _
_ :..__-- _ . . [�°a; . � _ : � _ : _ _
� _
� � '
_ _ . _ _ ._ �� . . _ . _
� __ .
... . . _ . ._ _ . . . , . _ . _ .. .
. . _
_ __ . ; _ . 'Lxy�� qk ,_ ._ . .. _ . .
:. _ . _ � ��.�..� :
-� : . �. � _ _ _ � _ � _
_ : _. . _ . .r.... ._... ....
�. _ � � .� � _ _
_
. ; . . _ . _ .
._ � _ _ _ _ _ .
_ . . : :
_ _ �k
� : _ � ; , �r �
e �
h �
_._. . ...:_ ..... . . .�_. _ _ _ ., :: _ , . _. . _
f.__._.�. ... : .. __, _..: . � . . . ; . _ _ _ . .
.... . ....... . . . .f �. � � ... .�.. __. .
_ �. : � . _ _ _ :. p 'ca� _ l,�� lra I� ° _ _ .__.
.
�� �
r�.,�i���.w.oioi
� �::
� � � � � � �w
4. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a temporary Christmas tree lot to be
located at the Texaco site, 2313 North Frontage Road/Tract B, Vail Das Schone 1 st
Filing.
Applicant: Steve Lincks/Dick Dilling
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
Andy Knudtsen made a presentation per the staff memo and stated that staff was
recommending approval of this request with the four conditions outlined on Page 4 of
the staff inemo.
It should be noted that Dalton Williams arrived to the meeting at approximately 2:05
p.m.
Bill Anderson expressed concern about the lights and the potential noise of the
generator which were being proposed with this request. He felt that there should be
limits placed on when the lights should be turned off each night. It was suggested that
9:00 or 10:00 p.m. would be an appropriate time to have the lights and the generator
turned off.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve this conditional use permit request per the staff
memo with the additional condition that the lights and generator be turned off by 10:00
p.m. each night and that the generator comply with the Town of Vail Noise Ordinance.
Bill Anderson seconded the motion and a 6-0 vote approved the item.
5. A request for a minor SDD amendment to the Golden Peak House to allow for minor
changes to the previously approved plan for the proposed redevelopment located at
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a brief presentation per the staff memo.
After limited PEC discussion, Jeff Bowen made a motion to uphold the staff's approval
of a request for a minor SDD amendment to the Golden Peak House, to allow for
minor changes to the previously approved plan for the proposed redevelopment, with
Bill Anderson seconding the motion. A 6-0 vote approved this request.
6. A request for a density and GRFA variances to allow for the conversion of the Fulton
Ironworks Restaurant to a residence to be located at 1136 Sandstone Drive, Units A-
109 and A-110/Homestake Condominiums.
Applicant: Karen Bouchard
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
November 14, 1994 ,Z
• �� . q�
�
� G ' `
MEMORANDUM PI
�—' ���
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission �
Ar-�"..�-
FROM: Community Development Department �d.�.�,; (v� �
DATE: November 14, 1994
SUBJECT: A request for a minor SDD amendment to the Golden Peak House to allow for
minor changes to the previously approved plan for the proposed redevelopment
located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st
Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
I. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
On November 2, 1993, the Town Council approved (by a 5-2 vote) Ordinance No. 28, Series
of 1993 on second reading. This ordinance specifically provided for the establishment of
Special Development District No. 31 (Golden Peak House) and adopted a development plan
for Special Development District No. 31. Additionally, this ordinance rezoned a portion of
Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing, from Agricultural and Open Space zoning to Commercial Core I
zoning. The Town Council also upheld the Planning and Environmental Commission's (PEC)
approval of a Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor subdivision request and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1.
On December 15, 1993, the Design Review Board (DRB) conceptually reviewed the Golden
Peak House redevelopment. Since that meeting, the applicants have not requested to be
scheduled before the DRB for a final hearing.
On March 15, 1994, the Vail Town Council, upon the recommendation of the Town Attorney,
determined that the Golden Peak House redevelopment could be a "demo/rebuild" project
without further review by the PEC andlor Town Council. Although originally intended to be a
substantial remodel, this approval would allow the developers of the Golden Peak House the
ability to demolish the existing structure and to rebuild the Golden Peak House from the
ground up.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE RE�UEST
The applicants have recently requested a minor Special Development District amendment
pursuant to Section 18.40.100 - Amendment Procedures of the Town of Vail Zoning
Ordinance. Further, according to Section 18.40.020(B), minor amendment is defined as
follows:
� �
"Minor amendment (staff review) shall mean modifications to building plans, site
or landscape plans that do not alter the basic intent and character of the
approved special development district, and are consistent with the design
criteria of this chapter. Minor amendments may include, but not be limited to,
variations of not more than 5 feet to approved setbacks and/or building
footprints; changes'to landscape or site plans that do not adversely impact
pedestrian or vehicular circulation throughout the special development district;
or changes to gross floor area (excluding residential uses), of not more than
five percent of the approved square footage of retail, office, common areas and
other nonresidential floor area."
As mentioned previously, the applicants are now proposing a complete demo/rebuild of the
Golden Peak House. This demo/rebuild would allow for the elimination of the existing
concrete masonry walls on both the interior and exterior of the building. These walls are
currently 12 inches thick. The proposed structural frame for the new building would include 8-
inch steel walls. This would allow the building to be "taken-in" approximately 4 inches around
the entire perimeter. Because of this modification, the applicant is proposing to shift the
building to the east property line so that the skier access way, to the Vista Bahn ski base on
the western side of the structure, could be increased by approximately 12 inches.
The reduction in the thickness of the building's structural framing system would reduce the
overall square footage of the building by approximately 400 square feet. Additionally, there
would be an approximate 110.5 square foot reduction in building site coverage. Staff believes
that these changes are positive, due to the slight reduction in the building's mass and bulk,
and the widening of the Vista Bahn skier access way. Another positive modification, although
minor, is that the northwest ridge of the building would be reduced in height by 4 inches and
the northeast ridge would be reduced by 1 inch.
Should the adjacent Serrano's redevelopment be approved by the Town of Vail, and
construction of both the Golden Peak House and Serrano's begin simultaneously, it is
conceivable that the Golden Peak House and the Serrano's redevelopment could be
constructed with a common wall. Should this be the case, the Golden Peak House
developers would like the ability to shift the building an additional 6 inches to the east, and
therefore provide an additional 6 inches in the Vista Bahn skier access way.
III. STAFF DECISION
The staff believes that the proposed changes to the Golden Peak House development plan
will have a positive impact upon the basic intent and character of the approved SDD. We feel
that the changes would be consistent with the design criteria as listed in the SDD chapter of
the Town's Zoning Ordinance and specifically, Section 18.40.100(A), and have approved the
applicant's request.
The Town's Zoning Ordinance provides the PEC the authority to uphold, overturn or modify
the staff's decision.
c:lpec�mem os\gold pk 11.7 4
/� a�o�. .
-� A�( � a".�"
2
� �
�'I� E
�OPY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 14, 1994
SUBJECT: A request for a minor SDD amendment to the Golden Peak House to allow for
minor changes to the previously approved plan for the proposed redevelopment
located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st
Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
I. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
On November 2, 1993, the Town Council approved (by a 5-2 vote) Ordinance No. 28, Series
of 1993 on second reading. This ordinance specifically provided for the establishment of
Special Development District No. 31 (Golden Peak House) and adopted a development plan
for Special Development District No. 31. Additionally, this ordinance rezoned a portion of
Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing, from Agricultural and Open Space zoning to Commercial Core I
zoning. The Town Council also upheld the Planning and Environmental Commission's (PEC)
approval of a Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor subdivision request and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1.
On December 15, 1993, the Design Review Board (DRB) conceptually reviewed the Golden
Peak House redevelopment. Since that meeting, the applicants have not requested to be
scheduled before the DRB for a final hearing.
On March 15, 1994, the Vail Town Council, upon the recommendation of the Town Attorney,
determined that the Golden Peak House redevelopment could be a "demo/rebuild" project
without further review by the PEC and/or Town Council. Although originally intended to be a
substantial remodel, this approval would allow the developers of the Golden Peak House the
ability to demolish the existing structure and to rebuild the Golden Peak House from the
ground up.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicants have recently requested a minor Special Development District amendment
pursuant to Section 18.40.100 - Amendment Procedures of the Town of Vail Zoning
Ordinance. Further, according to Section 18.40.020(B), minor amendment is defined as
follows:
� �
"Minor amendment (staff review) shall mean modifications to building plans, site
or landscape plans that do not alter the basic intent and character of the
approved special development district, and are consistent with the design
criteria of this chapter. Minor amendments may include, but not be limited to,
variations of not more than 5 feet to approved setbacks and/or building
footprints; changes�to landscape or site plans that do not adversely impact
pedestrian or vehicular circulation throughout the special development district;
or changes to gross floor area (excluding residential uses), of not more than
five percent of the approved square footage of retail, office, common areas and
other nonresidential floor area."
As mentioned previously, the applicants are now proposing a complete demo/rebuild of the
Golden Peak House. This demo/rebuild would allow for the elimination of the existing
concrete masonry walls on both the interior and exterior of the building. These walls are
currently 12 inches thick. The proposed structural frame for the new building would include 8-
inch steel walls. This would allow the building to be "taken-in" approximately 4 inches around
the entire perimeter. Because of this modification, the applicant is proposing to shift the
building to the east property line so that the skier access way, to the Vista Bahn ski base on
the western side of the structure, could be increased by approximately 12 inches.
The reduction in the thickness of the building's structural framing system would reduce the
overall square footage of the building by approximately 400 square feet. Additionally, there
would be an approximate 110.5 square foot reduction in building site coverage. Staff believes
that these changes are positive, due to the slight reduction in the building's mass and bulk,
and the widening of the Vista Bahn skier access way. Another positive modification, although
minor, is that the northwest ridge of the building would be reduced in height by 4 inches and
the northeast ridge would be reduced by 1 inch.
Should the adjacent Serrano's redevelopment be approved by the Town of Vail, and
construction of both the Golden Peak House and Serrano's begin simultaneously, it is
conceivable that the Golden Peak House and the Serrano's redevelopment could be
constructed with a common wall. Should this be the case, the Golden Peak House
developers would like the ability to shift the building an additional 6 inches to the east, and
therefore provide an additional 6 inches in the Vista Bahn skier access way.
111. STAFF DECISION
The staff believes that the proposed changes to the Golden Peak House development plan
will have a positive impact upon the basic intent and character of the approved SDD. We feel
that the changes would be consistent with the design criteria as listed in the SDD chapter of
the Town's Zoning Ordinance and specifically, Section 18.40.100(A), and have approved the
applicant's request.
The Town's Zoning Ordinance provides the PEC the authority to uphold, overturn or modify
the staff's decision.
c:�pec�memos\gold pk 11.14
2
• w . � �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 303 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657
i � .
October 17, 1994
Mr. Mike Mollica
Director
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mike,
Attached is an application for a minor amendment to SDD No. 31
(Golden Peak House, 278 Hansen Ranch Road) . As you are aware, the
development of the Golden Peak House did not occur this past
summer. Last spring, we went to Town Council to discuss the
option of demolition of the existing building in lieu of
remodeling and additions . They did not object to the concept and
felt the ordinance did not limit this possibility. Since that
meeting, the applicant has redesigned the building with that in
mind. Initial estimates appear to make the redevelopment a more
viable option. With the new building came the elimination of
thick ( 12" ) concrete masonry walls at both the interior and
exterior of the building. This created additional square footage
within the envelope of the building which the SDD would not allow;
therefore, the footprint of the building was modified (reduced) to
compensate. With this modification, we have the same square
footage ( 18, 715 GRFA) within a smaller building. The smaller
building was then shifted to the east property line ( 6" off the
existing property) to allow for an increase in the skier accessway
of approximately 12 " . In addition, the south edge of the building
was held tight to the southern boundary, allowing the building to
move approximately 12 " to the south. With these changes, the
plans, elevations and sections were reworked and are being
submitted with this application.
Attached is a list of the major changes to the drawings that
impact the proposal . We had made an initial presentation to the
Design Review Board, and a majority of their concerns related to
the commercial storefronts and signage. The storefronts have
since been reviewed with the tenants, and both their requests have
been taken into consideration with this proposal . In addition, I
have analyzed the revised proposal as it relates to your zoning
analysis and Ordinance No. 28, and have the following statistics :
. . . 2
' r � � �
Mike Mollica
October 17, 1994
Page 2
1 . Lot area: unchanged at 8, 375 SF
2 . Setbacks : north - same
west - 1-12 ' (increased)
south - same
east - 0 . 5 ' (decreased)
3 . Height: unchanged (as shown on roof plan)
4 . Density Control : unchanged
A - 14 dwelling units ( 3 with lock-offs)
B - 2 accommodation units
C - 18, 715 SF - total GRFA
D - 2 , 850 SF - excess common contributing to GRFA
total
5 . Site Coverage: 7, 714 SF (reduced by 160 SF) or 92� of lot
area
6 . Landscaping: enlarged planter areas ( 3 ) - as shown on site
plan
7 . Parking: unchanged
All other aspects of Ordinance No. 28 shall remain the same, and
with the smaller building shifting to the east and south,
sun/shade and view issues will be improved (if only slightly) .
One other aspect of the minor amendment request would be the
opportunity to modify the building location on the property
(without coming back for another minor amendment) should the
Serrano' s/Cyrano' s redevelopment be approved by the Town of Vail,
prior to the beginning of construction. Our interest would be to
join buildings along the common (east) property boundary on a
common footing and foundation wall . If this is accomplished, the
proposed building could shift an additional 6" to the east and
allow for an even wider skier accessway on the west than is
presently being proposed with this application.
With this submittal, our hope is to present these changes at your
regularly scheduled PEC meeting on November 14, 1994 (unless an
earlier presentation in conjunction with Serrano' s/Cyrano' s is
desired) , and then go before DRB at their November 16, 1994
meeting for another review.
If you have any questions or need additional information
concerning this matter, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
Craig nowdon
' ` • � �
CHANGES TO THE SDD (ORDINANCE NO. 28, SERIES OF 1993) FOR THE
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE, VAIL, COLORADO
(all new drawings are dated 10/17/94 )
• Site Plan
• modified building envelope - reduction in size by 105 SF
(due to new versus remodeled building)
• due to the applicants desire to redevelop the Golden
Peak House Building as a new building (in lieu of a
remodeled building) , thick interior/exterior CMU walls
are abandoned and the gained square footage (GRFA/common
and commercial) had to be compensated for by reducing
the exterior envelope of the new building
• shift in building envelope to east by approximately
1 ' -0"
• 1 . wider skier access by 1 ' -0"
2 . if Serrano' s/Cyrano' s proposed redevelopment
is approved by the Town of Vail prior to the
planned start of construction (April 1995) of
the Golden Peak House, a common wall and an
additional 6" shift to the east can be
anticipated.
• proposed west planter ( skier accessway) has been
enlarged
• grades and the on-grade walkway along the southeast
portion of the building have been modified to improve
ski slope access to the building and reduce the proposed
staircase to the street level of the building. This
should also tie into the proposed Serrano' s/Cyrano's
redevelopment better along the common property line.
• extended walkway planters along the west and southeast
ends of the on-grade walkway
• the north side walkway is at street level, rather than
on a raised ( 6" ) curb
• Basement Plan
• reduction in building footprint
• minor reorganization of common/commercial spaces
• First Floor Plan
• reduction in building footprint
• minor reorganization of common/commercial spaces
• see Site Plan modifications
• Second Floor Plan
• reduction in building footprint
• minor reorganization of common/commercial and
residential spaces
• relocation of owner ski lockers from basement to second
floor hotel lobby
• creation of Unit 207 as a dwelling unit in lieu of Unit
404 (eliminated)
" . - � �
Page 2
• Third Floor Plan
• reduction in building footprint
• minor reorganization of common and residential spaces
• Unit 311 modified from 1 dwelling unit to 1 dwelling
unit with lock-off
• reduction in decks (north) of Units 305/307 and 311
which reduces site coverage by 55 SF
• Fourth Floor Plan
• reduction in building footprint
• minor reorganization of common and residential spaces
• elimination of Unit 404 as a dwelling unit (incorporated
into Unit 403 )
• Fifth Floor Plan
• change in building footprint
• minor reorganization and addition of common and
residential spaces (southwest corner)
• Roof Plan
• reduction in building footprint pulls roofs in (to the
south) by 12"
• same roof peak elevations as previous application
• minor changes to roof at northeast corner and west line
• Elevations
• North
• elimination of Second Floor deck/railing at
Los Amigos (addition of awning)
• reconfigure storefront windows/doors
• reorientation of Los Amigos entry roof to north
from northwest
• addition of wood bay ( in lieu of deck/railing) at
Third Floor (Unit 301 ) to match Second Floor
• West
• reorientation of Los Amigos entry roof to north
from northwest
• minor reorganization of windows/doors at Third and
Fourth Floor residential
• extended at-grade planter
• elimination of chimney at southwest corner
• reconfigured storefront windows/doors
. _ � �
Page 3
• South
• reduction of roof over stair to basement (southeast
corner)
• minor reorganization of windows/doors at
residential floors ( Second through Fifth)
• minor reorganization of windows/doors at commercial
(First Floor) southeast
• elimination of chimney at southwest corner
• West
• elimination of stair and Fourth Floor cantilever
(Basement through Third Floor pulled out)
• elimination of Fourth and Fifth Floor windows due
to Serrano's/Cyrano' s anticipated expansion
• Building Sections
• representative of building with modifications
- � � � •
�� ..l -
revised 10/5/92 '
, DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED � � � �
APPLICATION FORM FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PL�1N � r ,_ � ,:
. ,�!.,
I . This procedure is required for any project that would go . �,`}-'ify
through the Special Development District procedure.
The appl�cation will not be accepted until all information
is submitted.
(please print or type)
A. APPLICANT "'Ed �X��f�lk f'i I �? 7G�1G�1 )
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE
B. APPLICANT� S REPRESENTATIVE �h�N�bVI �N�°I rj'ppk�l�{�v '�r�l�
�D�SS 241 ��� G��ak �rir� �7�� . DIbS�,,,,PHONE ��'`(��/' Y�'i/I
� C. PROPERTY OWNER(S)_ �ZQ� (�X1�11 YI� � �'a�T�'G�� �
OWNER(S) SIGNATIIRE (S)
MAILING ADDRESS
' PHONE
D• SOTREETOADDRESSOPOSAL: �?$ I},a ��h��.. U�Ij .� . n►b57
► r� h5on
��
LOT ��BLOCK 2 SUBDIVISION__ V'al �{�I2`o�Q� �`I",�
E. STAMPED, ADDRESSED ENVELOPES OF THE NAMES OF OWNERS OF
ALL PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND A
LIST OF THEIR NAMES AND MAILING ADDRESSES .
F. A TITLE REPORT TO VERIFY OWNERSHIP AND EASEMENTS .
II . Four (4) copies of the following information 'must be
submitted:
A. Detailed written/graphic description of proposal;
B. An environmental impact report shall be submitted to
the zoning administrator in accordance with Chapter
18 .56 hereof unless waived by Section 18 .56 . 030, exempt
projects;
C. An open space and recreational plan sufficient to meet
the demands generated by the develop�ent without undue
burden on available or proposed public facilities;
D. Existing contours having contour intervals of not more
than five feet if the average slope of the site is
twenty percent or less, or with contour intervals of
not� more than ten feet if the average slope of the site
is greater than twenty percent .
E. A proposed site plan, at a scale not smaller than one
inch equals fifty feet, showing the approximate
locations and dimensions of all buildings and
structures, uses therein, and all principal site
development features, such as landscaped areas,
recreational facilities, pedestrian plazas and
walkways, service entries, driveways, and off—street
parking and loading areas with proposed contours after
grading and site development; .
_
� �r�J
1 -,.,� _�-�`�-(��� � ` �
i�( t-F1� �
� � �;�.---
r
` . _ � �
.
.
EXHIBIT A
� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
APPLICANTS
Goldon Poak 8ousa Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-5667
By: - ��'��
Rosslyn Valentine
Vail Associatas, Iac.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorad 81658
(303) 476-5
�
.
By: `
Chris yman
GP8 Partnors, Ltd. (Developer)
300 Crescent Court '
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 855-3706
By:
Clark S. Wi ingham, General Parnter
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-008D
. �
By: � •
Rona H. �Ri y, Presid
r � •1 �
EXBIBIT B
� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
OWNERS
Golden Peak 8ouse Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-566
. By: • Ge!�.ti �
Ross yn Va ent ne
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
(303) 476-56
By:
Chris yman
Marqaritavillo, Inc.
228 Bridge Street �
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476=0080
By:
Ronald H. Riley, sident
�� �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ������ 0� ��Q������°� �
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201 DATE �oa No .
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 � /
ATTENTION
. .{� �� I � (I V RE '
TO
/ f 1
� .
WE ARE SENDING YOU � Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order C
❑ Shop drawings f�Q Prints � Plans ❑ Samples O Specifications
COPIES .DAT NO. DESCRIPTION
t �!�- � ` S
� l a .
!/ � �
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
.� For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
� ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
'{� For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
r
� � / �'• r
.
'� �/�/ f /
�
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once
�
` - • •
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 303 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657
GOLDEN PEAR HOUSE — ADJACENT PROPERTY OWI�PERS
Hill Building Blanche C. Hill
311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Serrano' s Building Margretta Parks
P.O. Box 37312 P.O. Box 365
Denver, CO 80237 Vail, CO 81658
Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Associates Joe Macy, Mountain Planning
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81658
U. S . Forest Service P.O. Box 190
Minturn, CO 81645
Red Lion Building Oscar Tang
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Robert E.M. and Aagje M.T. Nourse
1417 Indian Creek Drive
Fort Worth, TX 76107
Charles Rosenquist
P.O. Box 686
Vail, CO 81658
Richard Brown
1780 South Bellaire
Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
1G/26/94
k0� �14 � �a�� � D��.�_Y ��. { x����
� x
1
- .
�e �t" ` �.:�A �
�C� �: " ,.
�.._ 1 �
r
_ O C� ' �'��
u 7 "'.i►
T `l r ;�A i i•t;� ...:�
1 Y ' l�Uil�ii`��� �r::��, L}���
�
� • • •
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on November 14, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration of:
1. A request for a density, GRFA and parking variance to allow for the conversion of the
Fulton Ironworks Restaurant to a residence to be located at 1136 Sandstone Drive,
Units A-109 and A-1101Homestake Condominiums. -
Applicant: Karen Bouchard
Planner: Jim Curnutte
2. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for a temporary Christmas tree lot to be
located at the Texaco site, 2313 North Frontage Road/Tract B, Vail Das Schone 1 st
Filing.
Applicant: Steve Lincks/Dick Dilling
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
: 3. A request for a minor SDD amendment to the Golden Peak House to allow for minor
changes to the previously approved plan for the proposed redevelopment located at
278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Craig Snowdon
Planner: Mike Mollica/Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for an update for a major amendment to the Glen Lyon SDD to allow for a
revision to the master plan to allow for the expansion of the Glen Lyon Office Building
located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesUArea D, Glen Lyon SDD.
Applicant: Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Associates of Chicago, represented
by Pierce, Segerberg and Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
5. A request for setback and common area variances to allow for a revised, expanded
entry on the east e�evation of the Holiday House, located at 9 Vail Road/Lot B, Vail
Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Holiday House Condominium Association
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
6. A request to amend Section 18.57, Employee Housing, to set forth requirements
pertaining to Type VI Employee Housing units and set forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
�
. '
�
. ��
�i�'+ I I�I'T�l�l�1�S
T
�!
..::.C:•'.:iCi+.:ii?i:�ii:i:jjijii:4ii}ii}ii:ii}rii:?iY4'4}ii:ii::i4iiiii'!i•ii•. ............ ............................ . ..... ............................
TOWNOFVAIL �cE�rNO. �1 �! t����,
DEPAR7MFsNT OF COMA[UN1TY DEV6LOPMENT
� i
.
Nn� 1 `���I�;C�� �-j C�Gl'�j,.� y 1�;\
:.;
;:•
nnn�ss �-�'� ��� ��i?G Q ' � � �� .-� I � �l� �L`, <.�� nn� ��_ i ��� i �� � �"
PROJECf I� �I _I� c�'�� � ���f� �, V ��F }��)'�� ��� � 1�� �
CH6CKS MADE PAYAB[.E TO'POWN OF VAII.
ACCOUNP NO. ITF�I NO. TAX COSf Fri TOTAL
`�: 010000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $$pp��
>� 010000 42415 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE $50.00 *
':: O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE $36.00 �
::' Ol 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $32.00 *
��: 010000 42415 UNIFORM FIRE CODE $36.00,*
;; Ol 0000 42415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE $30.00 *
_: 010000 42415 OTHER CODE BOOKS *
>` 010000 41548 BLUE PRINTS MYLARS $7,00 *
�:; 010000 42412 XEROX COPIES $0.25 *
:' O1 0000 42412 STUDIES *
��: 010000 42412 TOVFEES COMPUTER PROGRAM $5.00 *
'::: O1 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES/RE—INSPECTIONS
>': 010000 41332 PLAN REVIEW RE—CHECK FEE $40 PER HR.
;' 010000 42332 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
�: O1 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
::' 010000 41413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE $20.00
::: 010000 41413 ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE FEE $1.00 PER SQ.FT.
:' Ol 0000 42440 VTC ART PROJECT DONATIOI�T
�:' Ol 0000 41331 PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE
��� 010000 42371 INVESTIGATION FEE BUILDING
::': 31 0000 45110 TOV PARKING FUND
?' Ol 0000 22027 TOV NEWSPAPER DISPENSER FUND
��' * 010000 21112 TAXABLE @ 4% STATE �
`'' * 010000 41010 TAXABLE @ 4°10 TOWN
�� O1 0000 42371 BUILDING INVESTIGATION
OTHER
PEC APPLICATION FEFS
::' Ol 0000 41330 ADDITIONAL GRFA "250" 200.00
:: O1 0000 41330 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $200.00
::: 010000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION LESS THAN 100 SQ.FT. $200.00
�:� O1 0000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION (MORE THAN 100 SQ.FT. $500.00
":: 010000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NEW $1,500.00
<: Ol 000041330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT �MAJOR AMEND $1,000.00
::� 010000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MINOR AMEND $200.00 _ -
>' 010000 41330 SUBDIVISION
::': O1 0000 41330 VARIANCE $250.00
��: 010000 41330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS $250.00
; 010000 41330 RE — ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER
TOTAL:
::;COMMENTS:
:;::
:;� ...,
;... , f
CASH� ]CK# ��� _Jl(� I DATE:�/�/�_t`1 REC.BY: .)I ? �
}
- �ARTNERS, LTD.
278 Hanson Ranch Road One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606
Vail, Colorado 81657 Dallas, Texas 75219-4471
303 476-5667• FAX 303-476-0470 214 523-3706• FAX 214 523-3929
�` g� �-;�.
.:�J����
February 22, 1994
Mr. Mike Mollica, Planner
Te�=,�n cf �I�;i
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mike:
As you know our cost estimates for remodeling the Golden Peak House came in
substantially higher than anticipated. During the planning process I was projecting a $300,000
shortfall. The actual number came in at a $1,736,000 loss!
We have decided to delay the project one year and analyze our cost options. With better
plans and time to bid we are confident that we can reduce the overall costs of the project.
At this cost level, however, it appears that a totally new building may now economically
feasible. If we do have to invest this much money we would all prefer a new bi:ilding to a
remodeled building.
I would like for you to approach the Town Council with the idea of our building an
entirely new building to the exact dimensions of the proposed remodeling. There are several
:�yc�..^.`K'.o°� t�t1iA'F'J�s�n. T�j�mh�r nnP �;�n�.2��L'�� ?�P.Z}PTy c�f£T hL'2�G�?!la w�,^.L'�.�1� ��S�J 1nC2P2eP
o•
the open space on the west side of the building by at least one foot. Additionally the overall
building height could be reduced six inches and even more if the Town lowers the grade of
Hanson Ranch Road when you redo Seibert Circle.
I don't want to spend money on new plans for a new building if the Town Council won't
let us rebuild instead of remodel. Please get a reading from the Council at your earliest
convenience.
Yours very truly,
_ . <<�;-�'.�_.
Clark S. Willingham
� • �
.
TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST
(Request form must be given to the Secretary to the Town Manager by 8:00 a.m. Thursdavs.)
MEETING DATE: March 15, 1994
(Prepare a separate Agenda Request for each agenda item. If the agenda item
will be discussed at both a Work Session and an Evening Meeting, be certain
to check both boxes in this section and indicate time needed during each
meeting.)
p� Work Session TIME NEEDED: 45 minutes
❑` Site Visit TIME NEEDED:
❑ Evening Meeting TIME NEEDED:
WILL THERE BE A PRESENTATION ON THIS AGENDA ITEM BY NON-TOV STAFF?
❑ NO.
� YES. Specifics:
WILL THE PRESENTATION OF THIS AGENDA ITEM REQUIRE ANY SPECIAL EGIUIPMENT?
t� NO.
❑ YES. Specifics:
WILL THERE BE MATERIAL TO BE INCLUDED IN COUNCIL PACKET FOR THIS ITEM?
❑ NO.
� YES. If yes, is the material also for public distribution?
�Yes.
❑ No.
ITEM/TOPIC:
Discussion with Clark Willingham, developer of the Golden Peak House redevelopment, regarding a
potential demo/rebuild of the structure (278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail Village
2nd Filing).
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Subsequent to the Council's discussion with Clark Willingham regarding the demo/rebuild, the staff
would request that the Council direct the applicant to proceed with one of three options:
1. The Council can decide that a demo/rebuild shall require the review of the PEC, and as
such, direct the project to go back through the planning process.
�� The Council can decide to approve the demo/rebuild project, per discussions with Clark
Willingham today, and direct the applicant to proceed to the final DRB review of the
project.
3. The Council can deny the applicant's request for a demo/rebuild project.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
Please see the attached letter from Clark Willingham to the Town of Vail, dated February 22, 1994,
included in the Council packet.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
None. ��� �—L°�---
Mike Mollica, Community Development
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
� � � •
Iz . >s• 93 1���,- �� f�� — �� .Z�
�� s�,�,
�-�-
� � � �
`� 5
�,�. �,N--e ��, � � .�� �. �'� ��
��� .
�-�.- �� ��,z .�-��� �,... 7'�. . 7'�.
.G�e � �f�-�..-� �.��:
• R�,�� � � , � ':�� �_ � ���
� � �
. � � ��
' �'-��� - ��
��- - �� � .� - �-� .� .
c - � � -� � .�'� � �;,�
� ��
��'� .
�;�� c�,ri-e �� � ��73 . �� �=��-o--�
� � �,. ���,�- _ A,�,Y..� � �-�--
� C� �
��-e — 2� o� 1� �
���,�, , � ��o�.
� 3 -3�z
L-a�-� — .� e-.�, � �r�e' .�n.' �,�,C � �� -�
�/
�° P '��w .
— ,,�'�.a,,, � .� �� ����%�
� ;�� �o��.,�.=�.
V�/V�( ��� � �e+� !X/1'� ��!^G(/Y�/►-q/�'�7/� � � i'.'v..^C r
� � / •
'/ ,� , �\ _ - _ _O,,
� '�-(i6� GZ�� VS ��,E� O�C L�%'�-�-�c •
�
� � � �
d��i�/ � .�is-e- o� D�Q� � �+.- o� � Gt�¢e�- � o^ � '�E:Ca�c�C O
� 7 P� ?
Sn�-- 7�.��-Le ,� �` � .��" ���►�� j�,.�� � ���
.� .�—e , ti�-�l � .� .
�n�e�� - h?a�• .� �c� o-c�-� � .�-•-�e- � �- � , �� �
�
���
7��2 /�z� Go�-�-�1 �e i/� �'. ,ee
R ' �=��e ,�� �� �'� � �. .
�
R� � ,�c.� ,�..
�� — � � .�.
_ ���
s - ,�-� �-�-�/��j � �� �- � ��..
- /�� a�.o�e -�. �r�� �,�c.-e .��vn��.,-� �� � \ ,
' � a,��- �,-7�- .�'P a� � �e . �.�-�
/�=�-�. �
� " � �P �����
,� � - � ,�. oK . .�� �� � .
S - �c.�:�.� .� �,c��-r,( ('�� .�-./a�..�� � .�.,
� � .
�/ti►�¢� — �c�r. � �Ge .G,� +,.-/ a:�t�.�e �,v.��%w-e..�,
f
5mo�- - .a�� � •� � � - ,�.�
G��
� —�" �, �i���--.0
S - �:��g�:�� � o��.� — � � � -��-e,
5�,��— — � � � � - .
i,�-� ���
S --� ��
� ���
� �� �� ,
��
�� . . . .
�F�
� �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects �����Q �� �QQ������Q�
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201
DATE JOB NO.
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 •
ATTENTIO
ro � �l�d � �� � � R� �
��� �!' l � � � �� ___� _,,'�
�'�9, �. �/��'� --�.
---T- --� � .
� G li t 6 a J J"�
WE ARE SENDING YOU �" Attached C Under separate cover via ^� the following items: �t' �E��
� � : � .,... . . .. ,.,,`!'i V.:i iti �J
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order �'����?�` �� y
❑ Shop drawings � Prints .Qql' Plans ❑ Samples � Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
� � ,� ' �
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
� For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> � For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
.� For review and comment ❑
� FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
� �G' �� !� / �" � �
� ` S
� � s � a n � � � r �
r�� � � . ����� r
�� � � � �
'I �l�2 . � �U�i' � � L � � � �
<
COPY TO `
SIGNED:
It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once
,
• � �.r+rovisod 9/4/91
DRS APPLICATION - TOT�TId OF VAIL, COLORADO ;`.
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: _(J,�y �
DATE OF DRB MEETING. � S �
****�****�
-- THI3 ]1pBLICATION �ILL NOT B� ACC�PT�D
IINTIL ALL REQIIIRED INSOItI�►TION IS SIIBMZTTBD
*�t*******�
I. �ROJECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPTION: _ __��[a��11V) atn� ��►�►d�l -� �xisti� bo`�bU�
�'��k �O�s� u�l���,
B. TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction ($200.00) Minor Alteration ($20.00)
�Additfon (550.00) Conceptual Review (SO)
c. �wDx�ss: �18 at�v► ��v►d�► �a�l . I�a�l � �rolor ti
D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot � (, Block 2
Subdivision � � U��� L f i (
If property is described by a meets and bounds legal
description, please provide on a separate sheet and
attach to this application.
E. ZONING: GG`�
F. LOT AREA: If required, applicant must peovide a current
stamped survey showing lot area. _o�� 5 ti�t-
G. NAME OF APPLICANT: �laG 7��'G�1VR y9(I/�Ip�fir }'�f '
Mailing Address:
Phone
H. NAME OF APPLICANT� S REPRESENTI�TIVE:, 7hOW�0 ?Y1�f 0 •K4 � G�n��,(i{6
Mailing Address : � f� �V 4 i t 0 • z ti a yt
Phone �b -2201
I. NAME OF OWNERS: �iGL �F�d�I1F�f �XIM6�� I'�
*SIGNATIIRE(S) :
Mailing Address :
Phone
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at
the time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when
applyinq for a building permit, please identify the
accurate valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vail
will adjust the fee according to the table below, to � J �� ���j
ensure the correct fee is paid. " -,��'
FEE PAID: $ �---'�,i .�-- ��,�/�I (��,
FEE SCHEDULE: �
VALUATION FEE
S 0 - $ 10, 000 $ 20 .00 �
S ' �, OC1 - $ 50, 000 $ 50 .00
$ :�C�, �'ul - $ 150, 000 $100 .00
;: `,�', 001 - $ 500, 000 $200 .00
$:,�ci, 001 - $1, 000, 000 $400 .00
S Over 51, 000, 000 $500.00
* D$SIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL EXPIRE3 ONE YEAR AFTER PINAL
APPROVAL UNI.ESS A 80ILDING PERMIT IS ISSIIED AND CONSTRIICTION IS
STARTED.
**NO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED WIT80IIT OWNER'S SIGNATQR$
1 �
,�,..- -
.
. �, LIST OF MATERIALS �
NAME OF PROJECT: V�`�1� f�7l� �OK� �h1��►� •
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT C/ BLOCK �L SUBDIVISION �i U I G h4 �IIf�IOJ
STREET ADDRESS: �' ° ���► G 0 ?( �0 Of''?
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: � � � o IN �O� �7�
�}ous� �tildiv�
The following information is required for submittal to the Design
Review Board before a final approval can be given:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATER�A�, COLOR
Roof � a4t'� , Gf dV p h?��''a�
Siding � X ° �� Q tN �G S IN� �{�vQ
Other Wall Materials `�"�t�o 0�"N1��� (n��o W�1t��
i�"eVtQ ��o�ri�) �v Wt�'�t S��ou��' �fro�� ����"�'S
Fas��a woa� • dlH• �hin �fia�ae
Soffits '
,,Windows �OO • a v� 1� � . ?q � o�r hw�E N�7t'(�c�� 21�5q�,
Window Trim 09 • n '�n 4� .
D:.�rs �►�o - a��i ih ' 0 . �'� e or aWo� " i�k���u sa�
�cor Trim w00 ' N �h 0� • �'�u e
Hand or Deck Rails Wedd � b���'iy �Y' '��a�
Flues YY{l�?( - s{?iH/pai„f blv •kauc•�
Flashings �I����'i( � I„/h'�'tM� ���( •��i(va �
Chimneys - �►i II�V?�o �►4►I�a�
Trash Enclosures ,� (Ihsl � UI�(tf1d1 �
Greenhouses
Other � GO n im ��01 4 �N 0� -f 7�1[°�
� o s u B 1�► b�vD� " �i " 2115��i
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer: 5�0 'iYf 0 tYK � i
Phone:
�•' '�.NT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name Ouantitv Size*
• ; .�POSED TREES � � 4 c � G� ' �_ �
EXISTING TREES TO �(1114� Ga�O�� � . ��� I
BE REMOVED .
pi�a� ���(rna�nw� `l m�nw S rWr� �" ►
�1Ns�1� -�v't4��a�,� ��oGa�'t,� b �y `ho� vn nni �Ln nn4 rr+ce ' �N'� ° �.
o d v��i b" l
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum calicer for
deciduous trees is 2 inches . Indicate height for coniferous
trees . Minimum heicrht for coniferous trees is 6 feet .
7
/ �A
PLANT MATERIAL�: Botanical Name Common �me Quantitv iS ze*
PROPOSED SHRUBS � 5 0 • S�rN{ G 11 I � �Q_
o ' 4hurn • �_ �
�ra�o I�� us �
��rNnu� Vi��h�„„ Ghe���1wV � �_
EXISTING SHRUBS •
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is
5 aallon.
Tv�ae Sauare Footave
` GROUND COVERS T�b1�t5 l I►J 1�1� �O�I-�•
YhBUf�tri a�utif Um � h10��w .�1h8(N-Ih-S�tNlrri� '
soD �'�blaU� �aw►a�� sod {�'sm ��t't�dlhal so�i�ti �o e.xis�i�
bw��a�b � 6-bSbD �:�.
SEED 'I��•
TYPE L
OF IRRIGATION � SHt�, T 64Y► IYI �a'VI�"IN�j b�� �W�'�� SB�I�h 0� bUl��N10J�
TYPE OR METHOD OF I�I'D
EROSION CONTROL
C. LANDSCAPE LiGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please
show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate
lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting plan
on the list below and provide the wattage, height above
grade and type of light proposed.
h/� •
D. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming
pools, etc. ) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining
walls . Maximum height of walls within the front setback is
3 feet . Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property
is 6 feet .
•5 a r wa Gra�S �
� h �1 Nr � � K� � s shG n 5�,- �I 'h a w �'�w►bw�' � i
• or�h W�► wa b �nfar b� i br'r � ¢x� �► �► �a�ov�� N
• a, a � m �v�r►a,u� � b 5 e G? o m�t�� Siaha�'G4v�/
pn��i� t �f��
s
/, • •
� •
EXHIBIT A
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE •
APPLICANTS
O�olden Penk House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-5667
�
gy.
� Ronald H. Riley, Pre ' ent �
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colo ado 81658
(303), 7 601
By• � ��l�c.
• Larr E. Lic iter, Vice President
GPH Partners, Ldt. (Developer)
300 Crescent Court
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 855- ,
By:
L�%i�%� � .
C ark S. Willingk� , General Partner
�
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street '
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476- 080
By•
.
Ronald H. Ri ey, Presi ent
5/27/91
.
. l . • • •
%
EXHIBIT B
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
OWNERS
Golden Peak 8ouse Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-5 67
�
By: ,
Ronal H. Riley, resi ent
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Co orado 81658
(303) -5601
By� . l���- .
arrj� E Lic li er, Vice President
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street •
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-0080 �
By:
Ronald H. Riley, Presid t
`
5/27/91
� Q
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects �����Q �� 1�QQ�1�G����1Q�
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201 �
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 DATE � e ,oB No �
v�
ATTENTION /��
� /
To , . . . d �`��. � RE . ,
� . o � *�' �� .
� o � � �
, WE ARE SENDING YOU �Attached G Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order � ��J�l��
✓ �
❑ Shop drawings 2�Prints �' Plans ❑ Samples � Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
s� �� � � �
!d �s 7 6 .�- .-�. .
� 'Lz � ��
1 2 y � y .
2� �
� �- •
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
� As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
�' For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
� For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
�vv � � � �
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosurcs arc not as noted, kindly notity us at once. �
� "
� � � rovisa'd 9/4/91
� DRS APPLICATION — T�WN Ot VASL, COLORADO
DATE APPLICATION` RECEIVED: IB /°�`� - ���4 �
DATE OF DRB MEETING: '
h�' �
****�*�*�* ���!.
-- THIS ]l?BLICA�IOD1 iiILL �TOT B� ACC�PT�D
IINTIL ALL REQIIIR$D ZN�'OItI�TION ZS 3UBMZTT$D
�********�
I. PROJECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPTION: �aI'a��IOV� 2�hc� ��►��d�l -� �,xiyti►� 6o��by�
�L7� �0415� �IA��a1V{41
8. TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction (5200.00) Minor Alteration (S20.00)
_�Addition (550 .00) Conceptual Review (SO)
C. ADDRESS: _ ry�� aV�VS ��Y►di1 IZb�I ► �?�, � �I�" 6
D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot � (, Block 2
Subdivision � � V��� L r i l
If property is described by a meets and bounds legal
description, please provide on a separate sheet and
attach to this application.
E. ZONING: �G'� '
F. LOT AREA: If required, applicant must provide a current
stamped survey showing lot area . '0 , ��5 5�•T;.
G. NAME OF APPLICANT: �iaG 7 �'�YR �XInIY�'�, �i '
Mailing Address :
Phone
H. NAME OF APPLICANT� S REPRESENT�TIVE:, Snor D 7M� 'D .KS � G�II�t(
Mailing Address : � P� V S i � 0 • = b � St
Phone - 0
I . NAME OF OWNERS: �GL �t��I1QA �XW►6�� IS
*SIGNATQRE(S) :
Mailing Address :
Phone
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at
the time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when
applying for a building permit, please identify the
accurate valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vail
will adjust the fee according to the table below, to
ensure the correct fee is paid.
�'EE PAID: S
�EE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION FEE
S 0 — $ 10, 000 $ 20 .00 �
S ? �, OCI — $ 50, 000 $ 50 . 00
S �G, !?ul — $ 150, 000 5100.00
;: `,"�, U01 — $ 500, 000 5200 .00
$::�ti, 001 — Sl, 000, 000 $400 .00
S Over $1, 000, 000 5500.00
� * D83IGN REVIEW BQARD ApPRO�ii�]\L EXpIRE3 ONE YEAR AYTER pINAL
APPROVAL IIN�.ESS A SIIILDING PERMIT ZS ISSIIED AND CONSTROCTZON IS
STARTED.
**NO APPI�ICATION WILL BE PROCESSED WITHOIIT OWNER'S SIGNATOR$
1 � -
� �,. LIST OF MATERIALS �
' �o���n � k °o�� �a�nod�►• —
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT C/ BLOCK � SUBDIVISION �i U I 6 1� �� ��'10�
STREET ADDRESS: '' ° ��� � 0 7�1 �O Ofr?
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: � � a IN �OI W
OU 1 l
The following information is required for submittal to the Design
Review Board before a final approval can be given:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TY?E OF MA�TERZAL � r_ . COLOR nt�'{��"�1
Roof p
Siding � X ° �� � � iGS IN� �Ip¢
Other Wall Materials �'�IWO 1�-W�� (11�h10 W�1�G�
S{�eVle (�►'►cXNi�) � W►�'�t Sl�o�r�' �(ra�� �(�^}�'S
Fascia Woo� • d�N• `htn �fia�pe
Soffits • N �„ ti�5q�,
, Windows NOO • h . ?it t, o� hW06
Window Trim �o ' � �" �` '
D:.�rs
�r�o - atK ih ' 0 .t� e or bwoc, " i��C"'1uSpl�
Dcor Trim wee ' � �h 01 • � �
Hand or Deck Rails WBOd ' b�'^ y � '�u�'�
Flues h1l�( • S�'i�pain�' b�v • auf�6
Flashings ,•-1,. '""" [ • ,� (n��7'�'In�� �t( •��Nfvt, •
Chimneys �� n�V?,0 �I���
Trash Enclosures h/e' ( INsld� UI�l11d1 �
Greenhouses
other � Go It Irh � 1101 S 'y 0( •f�K e
�r o s u
e ',n �?�vD� `� i + 2115��
g, LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer: 5�0 'iK d «'K � �
Phone :
T` "NT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name Oua�ntitv Si_
: ._POSED TREES ? � � � �
�_ �_
--- —
. �_ ��
��_ �—
EXISTING TREES TO p111f�S GOV�TD�f, t •
BE REMOVED . �
p�=�(rn�k� `l rn�nv►S ww �"
_ —
�1Nti�1� -�'�t��� i wWGa�� ° t y 'h o m nni �l nn 5 rNw ' �M= �_
.�.y�ys o d �v�,�irq� = �
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. M��iTM!��� cali�er for
deciduous trees is 2 inches . Indicate height for coniferous
trees . Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet .
7
. ,�,-
. � � �
PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Name �ommon Name an z *
PROPOSED SHRUBS � S 0 • SI�rH�b Gh� I � �,_
, o � 4� � � � .�
nrdo`�� us
_ —
���,n� V�T� Gho�,�►�w �.� �.
EXISTING SHRUBS � -- —
TO BE REMOVED
—
_.�_ __
�—
__—
*Indicate size of proposed shrubs. �Jinimum size of shrubs s
5 aallon .
� � Sware Footaae
, GROUND COVERS T71M111►�I b1�15 l IIJ l�}� � �d fr�•�•
f�BUh�WI a�Nyf UM � MD��ir�w�C,v►�l .�ih9l�-Ih-SNhtttt�- '
soD �'i f� � aoi�} sod �t'sm ��►ldi�► soN1b �O dxishi-a�
bwv� b � 6-bSDd �:�,.
�--r—
SEED �h�•
TYPE � b � Wa4 � t6(��� D bUll�i�f'14J�J
OF IRRIGATION �� S S 4 �n 7V1 Yl�
TYPE OR METHOD OF N�'D
EROSION CONTROL
C. LANDSCAPE LiGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please
show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate
lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting plan
on the list below and provide the wattage, height above
grade and type of light proposed.
h/� •
D. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming
pools, etc . ) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining
walls . Maximum height of walls within the front setback is
3 feet . Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property
is 6 feet.
•� avw� W'a�5 �
o y � Nr a, o K� � S ehb � 5�,� �I �n a w ��imba,r � i
. or�ti W�, wa o �nfar v� i br� � � w w �a�ov�� �
� A y a � m �Yl�ha�ur h� b 5 e G� o I��to� Si�� G6�
�'!�� �' �v��N�W/�
� $
. � �
�.
�I EXHZBIT A
I
� � GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
/
APPLICANTS
Goldoa poak Houso Coadomiaium Associatioa
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-5667
By: •
Rosslyn Valent ne
Vail Aaaociitos, Iac.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorad 81658
(303) 476-5
. ,
By• '
� Chr s yman
GPH Partaors, Ltd. (Developer)
300 Crescent Court ''
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 855-3706
By:
Clark S . Wi ingham, General Parnter
Marqaritavilia, inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 976-008D
� �
By• `
� Rona H. .Ri y, Pres d
,
_ � � �
, /
EXHIBIT 8
' GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
OWNERS
Goldaa Peak Houso Condoaainiwa Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-566
By: .
Ross yn Va ent ne
Vail Associatas, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
(303) 476-56
.
By:
Chr s yman
�rQaritsvillo, Iac. , �
228 Bridge Street �
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476=0080 .
,
� By:
Ronald H. R ley, sident
; .
� •
PLEASE TiAKE CHECKS PA� :E TO THE TOjdN OF
, ::.,..:...::.:... .....
. :.:...-:.�•� �,. .:..�::::�.::.�:�.,: :;; . ... � .��...;.>-. ;i;;::;:>:'. <��} �y >,�? -�i.: a . /'
-.:,� .: . �-�. . -..;; .. . ...... - � -
�.:, ..-_ .. .....<,:._ . . .. ?
:;% y� }ry--��� 7 tt r..`.
'��:, • ~ � �O�I 1 l O Jl i �� . . .
2:'
. . :cy
!:','
DEP.�RT�•1E;iT OF C01�i1�1[�';II�'Y DEVELOPl�1�NT '
SALES ACTIO;t FOR11 >:`:
� • 7 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD •
AIL, LORADO 1657 / ,
� �� D�l7E ( f��' �.� �"'
\,1J4E ti—
. . �;:;
::�
.{\i...:�yt:.t.�.} : '-. - .� � � � - .. - <^ - .-� M
.�..• . . .
:;,•�'CCOL1'T\'0:�,; :.. :; . .:::_ .::.:. .. ..: ::. ....>,.,. . ..•':ITE\;. :.�.. ,.::,; ,:::;,.,'�0 .;..>.. .:, COSTr.�::; : TOT,�L> :; ;�
<>: -
O1 G�041S40 I Z.C�'L�'G A,\'D ADD�E.SS!„APS � � SS.C�J �
O1 i.ti•�042415 I �`T:CR.�f�L7LD1G CODG I • I SSO.��(
�
O1 C�00 42�IS � U�IrOR��(PLli'��L�'G CODE � 536.6�I ' *
Ol G��O•12•;15 •� i.i;v'iFOR.1i��CH.�?�'iC.-.L CODi: I � S:2.C�� �c
O1 Cv���32d]5 I U�`IFOrZ�f FTrt�CODr I S:6.PJ I' '�
01 0����42�IS � N,17�IO;�AL rLE�,:C.;L CODE I � .S.O.C� �
01 L'OOOa2;)5 � OTiiL-�CODE�OJXS I I � �`
o! r����a�scs � BLUEPRL''�`fS('�SYL;,�s� I � s�.a�� � �
01 0'v��)4241 Z � Xc�OX COP�'S/S'i L•D�5 � � SO•25� ':?: �
01 L�OC'J-2�i1 j PLN.aI.TYFZE�/R�•1'SPECT,ONS � � � ( ..
41 C?'w''�-;1?32 j PL,�,�l RF�'IE',V R�•CNECK FT_E (5:��Ft�NR.j � � �
�
Cl C�C�C�J 42�23 � OFr}:OLRS L�iSr"[CTiON FL•rS � � I
01 C��,'*�a1a]2 � C0;1T,�.L�ORS LICE.�'S�.S F,_L'S � �
;:`;� O1 C���C��1��0 � O7'riER I-�EL•S I � I
.Oi C��GO 41413 � SIG\'APYL:CATiO;�f FEE � � S�O.G'��
01 Ct�v041d1� �ADD{TIONAI:SIG\',;GE ri.E (SI.P�i:R 5Q.1`I'.) � :<�f:
;;f O1 CC'C�J 42�-:p �V?C nRT FRO�rCT DO\'AT7J,! I I
_O1 C�;.'�" •:1331 ��PRL• PA�D DF�1GN R�V1�V�O;RD F�E � �; � -
Ol Q0�042412 � BUILDING-COi�'STRUCTION PERMIT COAIPUTER 1.�I KS �`�' *
��� * O1 OOQO 21112 TAX 4�)
�� *• O1 0000 41010 T�SX (4�) �s<':
'��, O1 0000 42371 INVESTIGATZON FEE (BUILDING) � �
:•. •
TOTAL DUE:
-� ... . .. ..
. ..
{:� ♦ .:.i��`r ': . \ /.
. . y :: . . . �'� �.
°.; '.::, ;..' .`...:,.. :... , ?�C,1i.t'ti'IC.1�:TI0\ �r.LJ.... ..�:.
.,. • _
,>. ........ ; ....... . ..,.:.
. .. ...... ... ..:..; ., .,.:,. >,...;, ., ....; . {,.., ....:
;:;; : Ol MOOa)3�� I:,DDiTlO,`�ALG:c�.� '2S0" � • -- — c20�.C�i
'>;: . 'O1 P:,'�-11330 �COf��DI'TZOti'.;L U5�PER.'•tIT • ' I I <<�.�I
��; Ol C�.'uJ 41330 ��WOR A i,n.R.�770�! LESS THAN 1 P�S .F1'. I 52��.A�I
01 OC��0413�0 I�YTERJOr2ALlT:RA7?O;�I (�SCRETNa�' 1G�SQ.Fi'.L � � SSOJ.P�� ' _ __ :;�� •
010.'vJ�a�330 (SPFCJALD�YELOF�IE*iTD1STR]CT 'E� � SI.SCrJ.Q01
O] PC�0413�0 SP�C).lL DEVELCr"�fE\T DI57RJC i (1•iI�JOR A1�4 -L'�`D] � S1.G��.C�O� �;?;
>,;'�. OlOi?0��41??Q � �SPECLALDL•�'ELOP�iL•;�l�i'D15'TRICT ,'��`OR A�4u\'D ( S�O�.OrJI ��
01 (k�4I330 ISL�D1�7S10:1 ::;;
Ol D�t�a l;;v �v,�RTA,\'CE S?SO.C�� .
01 C�JO�)330 1 ZO�ITT�'G CODE A.`9:�D1�SE*ITS - 5250.0�
�'•� Ol 0�41330 (RE.ZONII�G ' S2C�.00 I
'° O1 OPJO � ' `'
:�; '�";
. . • �>;.;
;�; ,
r::: :e
>' �:c.��.00�f�1L•�'TS:•::.:.:^: c;;; .
::�• >�?
i;: . . -:
>;>�
h` • `;s
h;;
�;<. � . • � ;i::
t; �"i,�t S.� �A .L:�' 'Lw� A' .yn '\ '�N�� �j.i ...\�S->. i=� � •i��. i')�v ^1> .L. �/-�.�< �.. Ji F;:�If.
� '
�
��C�,�►�
�
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993
11:00 A.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
11:00 A.M. 1. Site Visit: The Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road.
Mike Mollica Applicant: Clark Willingham. Architect: Craig Snowdon.
Action Requested of Council: Review site in preparation for
ciiscussion concerning the request for the establishment of a
�pecial Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor
:�ubdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View
��orridor No. 1. Staff will familiarize Council with the propos�d
redevelopment for the Golden Peak House. The discussion will
focus on background information and the zoning standards and
development statistics. The request will be reviewed at the Regular
Evening Meeting on 10/19/93.
Backqround Rationale: Please see the attached Community
Development Department's memo dated 10/11/93 to the Planning
and Environmental Commission.
12:00 P.M. 2. Site Visit: Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision. (Council is
Mike Mollica advised to please wear hiking boots for thls site visit.)
Action ReQUested of Council: Construction of the._Subdivision's
infrastructure and revegetation/landscaping is currently underway.
Council will review this site and discuss the status for the
completion of the improvements. No formal action is requested.
Backqround Rationale: This site visit has been scheduled at the
request of Council in order that they may be kept apprised of the
project's schedule and construction activities.
2:00 P.M. 3. Discussion Re: The Golden Peak House.
Mike Mollica
Action Repuested of Council: Discuss request for the
establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior
alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an
encroachment into View Corridor No. 1.
:5:30 P.M. 4. PEC Report.
3:�40 P.M. 5. DRB Report.
3:45 P.M. 6. 1994 Budget Overview:
3:45 P.M. * Community Relations.
Parr� Brandmeyer
:suzanne Silverthorn
Holly McCutcheon
4:00 P.M. * Police Department & Confiscation Fund.
Ken Hughey
5:00 �.h". * Special Events & Insurance.
Steve Thompson
1
\f ��
� �
�r'
5:30 P.M. * Marketing Fund.
Steve Thompson
5:35 P.M. * Lease Purchase Schedule.
Steve Thompson
5:40 P.M. * Highway Users Tax.
5:45 P.M. 7. Discussion Re: Par 3 Golf Course Proposed Lease.
Peggy Osterfoss
Tom Moorhead
5:50 P.M. 8. Discussion Re: Ballot �uestion Glarifications:
Tom Moorhead Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992, an ordinance submitting to the
registered efectors of the Town c�f Vail at the Regular Municipal
Election to be held on Tuesday, tfie 16th of November, 1993, the
question of whether the Town of Vail sales taxes should increase
$2,100,000.00 annually by the imposition of a new sales tax of 0.9%
on restaurants and bars and a ne�v sales tax of 1.8% on lodging
beginning on January 1, 1994, ar:� each subsequent year; the
annual revenues shall be designated exclusively for the
construction, marketing and operation of a performance and
conference center; authorizing the Town of Vail to increase debt up
to $ by issuance of negotiable interest
bearing bonds for the purpose of providing the construction,
marketing and operation of a performance and conference center;
providing for the cessation of such portion of the tax increase that
is no longer necessary to service the revenue bonds; setting forth
the ballot title; providing for notice of the election; providing for
conduct of the election; providing further details in refation to the
foregoing.
9. Information Update.
10. Council Reports.
11. Other.
12. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
• • • • • • •
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
aNILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/19/93, BEGINNING AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/19/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/26/33, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
• • • • • • • .
C:WGENDA.WSE
2
. _ _ _..._., �
' ", , � •
r�
� m.
;
x �
� N �
. ,,,�
� ,Z �—
_�O:
� � �� '
� 0, � rV� .
C
Z� � M
O
��
r,
O;
O•
�
V� ':= �
D ���
z, �� -�
_ ,
�-=%
� ,
�
. .�
m • ��L .
. x � ,�`
� 1 .
: Z �� v �
o' � x
� y � . S
. m �� /
�, �
� _ ._.
z •.�,
� I
� �� �
� ° I
� I
- � F � x :
. � j � .� � i
� i t � � �� i
� = r�
�
. ;
s • -
F . '
} �
�� �
S
;
i
i
.,�e�,..,. 9�oi �.�,w www�..w�«r
I N o.e. 5/31/97 GOLDEN PEAK NOUSE REMODEL �,,, .�
� .. VAlL., .COLORADO_
�, I I � - -
• � • ,' . .
� .
, m
� x
• y
. � '� ��
� Z
+ O � �
:
. _ � g�V
. • �. '� ,V.. `' �. L'�'.
O
�
r
o�
�p� _—_�1'�`
v
r �'
Z �?A'',. t
a
. �� �
L
t
� � ,�
t,l'
t�
1
� / D ;Y
_ X� =j � i�
i y� � �"
. -�; $ � F,
� o x� �
, n g�� � � �� .�
z F �
v �
� #
r �
O
O
� �_ �
� S
$
2 � �; .
� ��
I� � y
P p .
' jC
�1 �
� I
1
� �1 '
_ . i
� ti
�¢ � �
4 C�
C� � I
�� i
i 1� ' v
;� i
+F �
y I
^� �H �
�
�
I
bewro+ Y102 I
I n � GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �^^-��-•�• �
W � 3/�1/9J � � � �
VAIL , COLORADO i
• `
. ., � �
. a o0 0
, m• __ —
— ° ----
� X' ,
'. i,
� Z•
. � D
� O� I�-_ _—__—_-- --
• o
�,
v;
D. '."'n_ __ ' '
Z '—_._ --....._____'
� I
�
�\
�'\ �
� \'�, i
�ao o \ �� �
° O \ \ i
� X� , \ �
i N �� `� i
�
� 2 � �� \\ i
" 'n -- ' � � � 0
� O __
' C. I
x.
_� .
°o; o �
�' �
" �^.
. z. 'O �
i
A
% � \
� ` .
� `\
� /�Il
�� � / �.
/ \
� \\
!
/ Ji.r I( � I
`, �
�_� � i
� � � �
� - ,
, ; . ,
� o :-
,
;
., ,- ;
�. �F �,� ` . ':
; I
; i
\ ;
; ,
�
i
._ - .
I n �°""'°" "oz GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL S°�°"^°'"°'""m""
� D+. S/3t/9f
VAIL , COLORADO � n� I I
I
. � � .. .
, '
_� �� . � i �
• � �Iry—_ sa � .
II
j ` �� 0
� m
� Z�`__ �I� O O '
a°II Y O '�'O = � p :
��• --I� i
� s� ;��,������ �`I� o .
I o o d
� I o 0
m� � �--7 0 ,
I �il =� �� a H�I o o �
--y '��i:E:.O ..�0 O o �� °
�II � ��� ° i�
�- C� L� ��� � 'i c o
K I'
� � � o �,
�°jl [� C�I"` '! �
�B:�;g� �� � � -
i� o o�o ��
,i-- �� -- �._. =:��(o�� � .
i, �OQ
� �' �
ir—� 0 =�
j� (� �� .Lo
I � � �-
�� 0 � , � o �---- �.,� o
' �� � � o .' i �ii '�1 o
�� � mII �:J O
�� 0 0 0 � ��
�
�,;.
� � tl �`— � ��� �]r�
,,._-_ `� . O I - �
I x�� -- �4]�O
_� 60
� i - � '� :,�
�� �
. � I� � Q �
�� � - .
.� ���a.
�;� �o
_ � .�
�' A �0 f° , � � _
� m� --- - , 0..,� =
_� �� I� 0.��
<D — ( r� ��
��� =0 `� 0 ��
, o�I-- • � � .�:. .
H�I- i� �� �� � i
- �ii =� �� � .�� =° i
� �
� ���----� I� � =1� � ;
�---- _ �� ��1,�-Lv �;� ;
o�:�o �--- —--- I
� i
� '°°""`" "o� GOLDF'`t ':`EAK HOUSE RF1�10DEL �;,"��;,."°°"""'"�"`°' '
o.. snus�
� VA1'. " '.�;RADO I:�... '� .� I I
.. �::.rr�u•r' ..
r1 '
� � �= � s � •
������::� �
r-=�
., __ - - \
� \
� ,
.
o -�
3
9_ /
6 I:
0
y •.
r-----t_ � �
�
r
A. � �
. ; �' � � ���
� T
I �
�i p
� � 3
O � _
I „
� j . � � , \
• o
I e � 'j \.,\
• I i
a o • 'n�
I . �I • + •.I .
� w ; � •��
�.m N �� �\
D � � w �,� ,� � �� \
� � � ' I `� w; y \�� \%�
i �. � ' � ��\�
�� ;� � • �
O
--4: �� ��I ' P
\ B- � '
')rk� i- '
.�. /
.�,y%�. �
1�.� i i i .
� j.
`. �a�
�ti-
,.,.
: �� /
' � \
�
;;
m `
o � \ _,.
' �v Y
• r
>
z
o �
� .
0
'°°"�°" 9,02 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �'°"°°"°�°"°°"��""`"`°G' •
, m,�� m�
I�I o.+. 5/31/93. �'
VAIL � COLORADO
� � -
,�./ �
z3� , '
� Y
� d , ���.
�' �
_ ,
, ,
�
—_____�___===__3s�_=_=- �
: - �
� �
�
N �
O / `
� Q
O
p '�.
C
. ��
� �
• �
�
��
� � .
� 1 1 �
;1 �. \�
�
0 4\ \
a 4
� - \� �
�
� p �. p \
w
� ��\
�
/
� j �/
< i� ,a
�
O
i
\ \
� `���
� �' \ i
• Z! �
_ v
e o; `�
� � .
�
r
z�
e � .
�
M
, � b°�" 9,02 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �"°""°"°�"°°"'"'�""`°°'
��. . �Ou�G..Onw ]ro.,.�A�
.y; o.+. f/29/93 . .'ac°"„°° .'a'
:_ VAIL., COLORADO_ �
: � � •
/��:
� -�.� '
.� �
s - - -_�_ \
w � ~° � � l
� � .
� ��� ;�!��
°e. '�''i
. � � �- ;b' '• ',i��. � �
» 1 �,/ g
� p f 'N � ,= i . .
- f- � ro 7C - '� '
I � r �
� ° •
I o i � r_ i
I " � •
+,- �
-- -_-_�
e
c �
I — �i -
• � ; � ,��uua
i •
� o '� ���
- I 3. \\
I � � z \�
. z1_ ;' ' �`�� ��
C ��
��
I
'r'j
I � ` Q �'�
�
1 \
' � j � � ._ .v,�� �.
\
: I !� � \�\�,\ .
r ►'
r �
• N
1 +� O
\.'� . � `
■ ~ /•
�;2 a
\ ,� p ~
\ • �'
• �
\\\ � w
��
�
o� ���
\�•� �
r+ �
♦
_ m �. ,. �
; °p ��,:\�� ��;.
� o \ �
o k�- �.
. �
O
� •
r� � �
>
z
e
r
a
c
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �"°w°°"�°"°°""."'°"""'
JebNumbw �1C1� ���� ��
L�a . �.�,.,.. .�,
I � o.e. 9/29/93
VAIL ., �COLORADO
� � � , ' , .
. /��.
-- / �'' _ `�
�c — -- -
� ' _____ - - 1
. ;f'�'
�y!
����:
� .A I�_ LJ,�.iTJ
' I��i!''I�I!�I G����'�I
i',,'I �Q, I��
�;
\
, ���
���� ;� , ��. � �
i p �� ,`Y� �'\'�� .\
�� s \
.r� y. ��
I �y � r.
i:,li O. ��: . . .
� \ :\\
r� \\ �
� I �'� ��- � ���',: �
' ,I, .. , :• . ' Y. ���� .
��,;�.. a �
� ��\���, /
�\\�' � �
:� I:�_ '
�• !..
,. �. _ �
, � \\ �• �� b'
-� �`� ! N..
. � �\
.�
� �� ��
b � <....�� ..
� 0 \ ,./ ,
- � V
. �
r
> .
Z
,
a
�
b
/
� '°°"�°" °10t GOt.DEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �°,"°°""°"°°k'"."°"'°a'
�� or. 9/29/93' � . ���1i°w" � ��m�
VAIL � COLORADO
. , ; . ! �� � i .
:; .
� � .
; , .
� � .�.��..�
. �� .
. �--��-� %+ �
;
� ;;I-�;,��r o -------•.
�,'-
i�u,,
i �
.. � ' ��.� I
i;i''' � �
i�,�' . . � ' I:
. y_• � II I I' � I
i ;� I
�I�iy'� �
� . ,i�
.. I�,I ; � .
�
_ . i � .
, d
i
. ' '�' \\:\
� , ;
, �
� � �, \��\
.I .; � � \ -
I� �
' \:� V
\; � i• h .
�.. ;e�' �'
�� '�
. \� '�
�
S\�
\:
\
�
. \ ��
� �
�` � i/
� � i
� '� \,\�
► Z \ �:'`\\
e O
�.
� O
�
�
r
>.
z
e
e
��y "°"�°` e,ot GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �"°"'°°"�'°"°'�'`"'"`""�"
.r w�. ei3ve3 • . ��°".• �•:�
q� VAIL � COLORADO � �
: ' � � . I f . .
. .
;. .� . /..�..�.:� .
� 1—:�� ,� �,
. - � �--- -- ��
� o0
. � � � :
. � � �
� �
I
I
I �
I
. • 1
i ,
i •
�- !
� �
I ,
� / 1 \ � ,
� / �
I // \ `�
'.���:�,� \�
<u�\\ \ \ o \�`_ \
�'�.�� � A�
' :\\�\\ � o \\ � .
� \ ��
� �•
..
' ��\\ ,f %� �//
, �:��C / ' l //��'
, \ �;;
�\� .�
�`
� • � ����. �
� ������
�" . ,
� . O .
. �
�'� /i
` � . � j� .
� j:
f � \ �
\ � i
� � yi .
0 �
� ,�
. �
r
>
z
c �
N
c -
a
=s "°'"�°" °102 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �"°"°°"N°"°°'`'"'"`"'°`"
o.�. 6�z��9� mm.c,...u.�. am.,saoi
..►. ' w.cm.r ��mr
-+ VAIL � COLORADO
.� • � �
. .r� �
� /---- \
� ^ �------ • �
- , i
I :
I
i
=es R � I
wa1� �7
♦ � �
. . . . . . 'I ,, , `
� �
��� ,�
�
. . � ,����
. I ��. ,
�
. , , � .
,- ,
,
�� ,;---� �� .
� �
\\,\ - , . \
. �������� . � ��-- �
\
. � l ,�, � �,
.
�� ;� ,
�� .� - .a� �'.
.�
� ..i
. \ �� � � . \� �
� �
\ i
\, 'i <�
� ',;��
� `�� .
.\
� o
�
Y � �a
_.� \ �
� � i�.�
i
� � ' /%,.
• 7p� j' w .,
C ��' '
a O' �
� �,
�
o Z �.�
0 � -
N
c
♦
,b� '°°""m°" 9t0z �GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REPrIIi�DEL �'""°°"°"°"°°"'"'"`"'°�'
��.�.,�.. m.,.�,
j, od. eizsie3 . ��, •,•,
� VAIL � COLORADO ,
= Y�;���.
�a��o�sl- ._. 'Ct- ir'�-.a
�.�, ���1=� ■• � tL� �a
�I '~�I!�~ :i�'�iIJI! �� � �.�����
. 'I�i i0� ,:.� �: �.
�'��; ��� II■II �� _- ��'
- �, �,
i
���1 -��'�'�i .�:: ,'�I'' ,r :i �� � � ,
—.e �-� ��--�, �... t h ,-�i ��� "��
' ��� � - ,.,.-�� �:�/ i� II_, =_
i ��I_�:::�II.: is�l �,i I�I�1� ���i - I���;'
� � ( �
I ��i���� I-- w�I �L` ~- ~�I �•
��� �- .��' ��� I/` ��II��� _\ r
i � =�, I.��i �:�.I I?� ,_-�,-- �\, I
.��� �. _ � �
i�■ €�� �•� =� � �+: � ��I - ■1.
� �■_� ���=� -�� - _.� I-►l
�■ � �.� -_ ; , � ... _� �
- , _ r � --��_- ,��o
- I� �{ . - tt- . -- - ���
, �
� �
,.
, ■ _ . �I - @
�� _� �i�:__ �- �� �J- ';
_ �1 �
■■ _� �■� ��► �� i-�
� ��
■� ■■ !�!!�'�-�-�w
�::� �■ % i^� �i�!�r-
,��►��=�I�I�;�__ �� �= I��I I�� �!� /
-� � � 1=�1I� �=�11r
N.�_ � ��� �=�0',
!� �� j�� 11= ��rs' , ��.
�� �_� I��� I=�-��1���
i��� �--� I��—� �� a��,�
!= ��I=`��1'
�■ '" !'- I=�1�;L�►�
� 1��1 I��I ,�� ��
_� l,=� III-!1 I.-J :.��"q
� I_ �� :_.— �wx�
— �—��9=�I�ie•
��� II� 11=����`:; ��
ii�`I'��!`�,
�
,�i-_��-��q�--°,�=I� I�'j�;' �'�� ■
Il���n�l__,��_ "
I�--��� �il � �
Eu ��� �
: �iw = ---���_.
� ��; '-- _�� . � ���
-xu� • a;,
� �■ �� ° �� ;ii�;
� � I�� ,.,��
r� , _� . ��� �,
s: =�.; _ _-� _�
: ,..� :`� c
� �
" � �°��� • �
_ / _ � �� :��
� � �� I�� �
= r
�— ��., ::n�
,�, ,,� ---
�
• • • � . . .
. . • . . .
. ., � � �
� ' ,
� . �
�E � - ;
� i ` . '
- - •��� �`
f ��
�I �� �
. Q �, _ , �_
�� � �;�
�' , ( , '4� : I
m e � �� o.
O '�, '��` �, I.. �� �m �;
. ;'. , . I
_, �� :, o o. A �� �1 - --
� » I � '' I
� ��� _ e �� �e, , ; °
o $ z M (
�o -. •-�
� � � -1 I s� "-
� ` � x .�; �._, I ��
�il - a ... �a� ' � ;o ,>� •
� - N o °� �►�'. � � ! i I,o '
^ r � v \ � r' ro '•
S �:a ir � � �� 0 i�. ,
Q. ofO_ •
.ri . I \� � '� .y. .
m . '—`\ 0 { _; .�i - o
�i ° I
�- � : ��
.� 3. ( f •.. •"- (
(� � -- ------ --
f / I I
- - ----�r� -� � �
t4�; � . .��
� ��
F y � 3
� �
. .� � .
! �
z
� .�
�
�� �
I ,
� � �
i
• _ _ _ �__ � �\
' '�y•_
m 10 � .
/
� I� /, � - - �l C`
o � '
_ � � m �I e : ,,
_. i� o / _
� '• ►�1 '�" � i "'� I i
S � o N � �
�C. 4; +. i Z � �� .
i
Z -�1 ;�i
m w o; � [� �Hi i�� `
_ : ` � =. �� ~r- �V; I �J
O �� , � � p t �-' d _ r
� •
tCA • i ` oI �\ ` � : : ' r
RI �e.� h' ' \ � . - I
1 � � � �
� � p �
I
� • ' � o �A I
1 .. i
� -- --- - ---- j�
. � F --,
� � � - �1� - �
�f �� -� -�
� • �
.
$rqwEpn uW IbpklM•NcM1ec4
I�' "°"'"'�' 910t GOLDEN �EAK HOUSE REMODEL
��� ��
�J: ar 9/29/p3 '
�,a VAIL � COLORADO
, � ;• , .
�
�� .
, S
z • •
�
r
a
� — �
4
�
. �
i
O � '
- i
�•• / �
--�-- �--�_;,.—a""__�Y
- r--'---- .rt ,._. -- 2 —�..__.
—� �9�F� 1—__—� l� U;P�e'( �
� x._� i�n��. ]�'`'i`7¢It''i� j ,
� � � � /
� • � r ;�
� � ,
,
Y
C r �_ i
. �� ' � �
s l � � �I� '
. c `- •, * �., _ ,, �_i ;3
i �L II ` �",' , c� s���g
� ' � �d �� i � �� \ "'P� '
� y \ �i L--�---- 7 ��
,--
1 i �C� V � �������` ��E�� \ 's
n ' I � � �� . �� 3}�F� �� S
• I aa � �c '��� T i \ �i '
� � � ��' r� � � �� S i
I . �\ ^� �� � � $Z
•� �
I � �. ' '� `.
�. �,�' .
�
i. . ��.\ '•\ � . � �\
�� � .�� �`
� �` �- �
�j ' �> ''/ ' �
\'i ' ''
\ ` c �,
� � �� � `.
� \ ,
�\ .\
� \\\ S �
� � \\ �r
4
� �
� � .
(A�
�'
- m �
� �
: r ��
o = � Q � \
.c = �� ,�\
Z
.
�
_
>
v
m .
a
z
a
r-�
�
y
fA
?� '°°""m°` 9702' GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL ��nene��.�� �
..� Dm 9/29/93 • n�a,.c.wa.. an.�smi .
v.a cao.m �wr
� � VAIL.� COLORADO �
�
�� I^�
�---� = ' '�`
��'�'-= �i�IJ `� i� �'
.r■i .��. ��!���� I� .�� ��
� ��;iy�l - ��I �� - _ �'•:;
I��I i.-� .��i' ^�� ,f= �� �Jt ,;� ��I.
� m .y�' .�:=jl '=��I' _ II� _ —
��I��IIi� ��� I�� ����
C ,� _ �-,� ;il ,�; _ --y� ,�.
I �I���� ���, =-� ��,� ��I�^��
�o �:� I�=� �� �il� ; �.�- :��
-- _ - -� �� = - •.
�i�■ ��i ;��� �� '� ��:���� ��_ ��`�
���w .��i I,_ -- �� .,� _ =� ��l
I� I� ��, �� ,� ��I�,:,�1 i
- ���, � 0
- �
. �. ',��I I. ,� " 3�.���
� �
'�'�� ��: ��'�� �� � : ��
� '�' �
� �
� --
,
, ■ ■ � ■'° . � �
. ,
� ■ i�i � _ � �
(. i � _� �1 1
�■�' ,�.r '� ��I I��l_ � B
. �a ,� � �� �� .�. �
� � � �� l�� � �
—,nL �� - ��� i=�iI �'�i�'�
, ( !
��� .q,r.�=�� � ��1 �.� �=-� /
� �o'�F.:=.� �� ���� - �i��,
�_
� '_: iM� ;=��`Y�����`���.
��
��. I�.� ;��_ �
_ _�_�)
R i�_� ��=� �-_�..��w
i�- ii=- ��� �
i� !�z '�� ��))'p
s
,
— - ,��i'����,��
!�_ ��` ��t!��:i
� ::Ih�i�����
� �� �i' �
� , ,,:��f� �r.� � ���, �
=�����_ � � 1
ii�.���� � - � 1
� !� �� P -
R��
'' i� - -
� _ � �
� -.�, ��
�, I! ;� �
r� ,� � ;r
_ ,. � �� �
s ��i .r° '- _��■
. �� _
'� ► �` �1A
� "' � li�� i ���
���i�l � u�� �:I:
�ec '�—I�� ,_��
s' / ^��
� "X- � I li�_� �i i
��.� � ��I��
iw I � �
• � • • • .
. � • • - � � �
�t !��� . �� �..�c.v�+.�,�� _- / e;�
��H ' ;��
-� \ _..:.�._.�..._:
�I
,� ; , �• .j;; -
��V4 �,�h:• .� '.f� �i , f « '.,,,�J
� ��1� � �
;1� �
�y�4r . . . 1 �
TI; l�' � �� •�I l� ,�• . , ,�
� :� ly1: �� ��� ' . � - t \ �
�
! ! l -,
`A .v "9�. .�:. � ♦
. � ��. / / �7 ♦ ;A� w
? t�:�� �i� � � -- (�A I ~�
a �r
s ��� f 1 . �_ -,,� ,
i _ v�:
��
��f� fi �
�f�,�j�R�y7.� � "d�` ;} " � :� �['�, �
'', �„-s . .. ��;. ,�"�'�°,���'� - ,�-'�'�' — � ��
,y�4r���; �^i ;?^ r ..,:.�j�'� Y�
. �< r, .. ,. . „ �I��t�. I�-d .-.�-.... . Y ` 1
. +� .: '� � �• � � I1 '� � .
�n ��iZ: r�°'� . � � �i r'� j F�y �� � t t�ti�:'. � 4� ��^ i-
1 s``; e �4�: t �'(It14 n. � a"� �� kyk' ��1 r. �_ y� . � .
� � �;� t� ''�� - t . 1 S� yr � ,� �.-_
° F���� � ��� � . � ; �1r-i �� ,� �� ��� _ ''�_
� i�':� � r.. ,�, , �, ;i' ! .� !
}�„ { �'a y^�,'` 'j,' "'' a '
�� � , !{ ' � .
�� . . . ;�r ���. j . .
��i •YtFY2� � � . , . `� �� t.. .i 1,
r,�� .rjr '��,� .t g� 7r;. � a - � ,
>
t ,� � ,�r r., r
� ������t rvl �,'. . . 1 ; - °9 ` � .y '__
"�� �` S 4?� ',Y r;' h � � �'F
j KiY o 4 y�p.
t' � �.�4�1�:.i . . "��� •f
rFa��sr' {�� , . -
��J �7 .,a�� . . 'Y�1
,,.i.�l,e � ��-�7.�31r� „x_� . �ti - � .
r4' bt k�r J� �, :� " . -
�� x E{ .' r �, _ -
1 yy�� �
�i�f��, ��� f � �' .
���.5r�t�' �';;,�. � �
° �'T�ti � '.st�- ��� - _
..�'���� .<�3 t�� � _ __ ' .
y. `„�tk'�"'�� +�� .. . y��� �� .� •,�-� ,
k,,,�"= °� ��., 1�" �.� :�>,�.
K �cti��t � -
�
�. ) � r i.�. t' -- �L ^.�
�.� �'� '� � � � - . _ _
y, � � �.
_ 7 s.,�, : s.
��� .��• � , y
- � �� {� -
,�.r � %k � J� � .r;,,,M �
�r��Y'?� ��? 't' ' '�� '!� � � _' -r�
'ir:< , �� � ..
E � �,"•
�'���� � �.,r �r ; -
�^` '' '��n s. r.
. � � �
. 5�, j ,, . 1� �! .
"�vh �k .�1. � � �
. � •'
� t y,�. '� "� - . � _
S� Y I` I _
�� ',,., � �� � ���f' '�
f.,. �f-.• _y _ _
r' � + 7 I ��'', ��. .
�1��}' . ��+y�t\h��. l? I � � �Y �
�r���� ;� ".�r '"__:Ai ly .,I �i1�
'�„��: �„" �,``l . . ' � � " �'� ,
y � � �, i ;s ,.�
l�nx�;sr, � j ''�I 1 __ ,�I� ; :#�r �$
��� �rr :� �tk ry:p�����"' , I�l ;� � �. -
�` ry '11A !'I `��' �' - ��( `�°t
� .Lt � �kr_'.Ji�. �r
,� i ."' � '� --=� �' `�+ci� '�i
/ . , � T
�F��� �.0 s s', � �� il`
u, �,�? r -� �1 �/ - J,��.( ,� .i�����.
� ' F3,��h � �)�1� "— �f-1�1� �p� � �,��
D,t.n�c-6}hr �.v�� t �t, i• .1,-'���� �p '�
x+Y!� y? :_.Y«�rt �y� "-�'iP' y7l.C:s�,
� � ._� 1 � !'��ys � � \ `f �+;��jMk :..Y
G ,F
r„�'`�,�r1} kk �i� � .y��� f '..°r"`Fr .,�� f� �,'�y
�'Y�.:�',f'M '? \� '9L .•:� ? "� Y - '�� �� Z 7.� ����k"�.bEs���t�
�+��� kt, .x ��e��.F,r�� *` � .�� � '��r � :*� e,�' �`+�� ��Y �g����� � '/
p ,�.� s; �t.. , .",4Jif1.�� �:'"t °�, .rt'.. _ � ''� �S'�j�� . °.. ��'� Rt
ts.• �� C ' ..,Tt �. 1. f � . y :;.�q. ' . �.z�� � t
?FQ��,� i;a� /�r;-�`i��•e .y, "C'-`�2�r '� - ,�� �'s�� �� s �� r�.,� �y '1�x�k. �...
f,-c�+�r .��_ .a�G_..!' � '-t �s "4 � �� �. ♦ :� � .L. , .
..w .�+5- F� Ati X-_"+�'�,, P r� �.�w. 4.5,� 7'a'T' .]�L ..
�k-\�, �. �'��'�` c, � ^�- t���� '' � x.µz} ��"�'s� �"{� '� �. �^* �` ��. '�"��'� F� S
. r,a� '�' ��*� ��_,.'�` ��t"r� �., xn.r�., -,�'��x�»' r.��'t � ti`..,q aa+�.a ' A s -_�.Yr�4 J -y f y °�t '�`#l, �.
a , ,�� E. �_-g�e . � � a H �'� ,.�� .� 7t �
ti ,r, s � � j'?j�� �t ,�• � �.v �� � �is" "t �G. ..,� �:, �l'�� � �y�j � k }'���. ��` �t`s��rV 1, .
�j, � � Y, d ,„��
t,+`!�:.:.;•� n' , •�� ��2'�, �]„,=�R.�r�- �� � �� �`-`'9��ra'� .:t:,.-, ' �'�� �:,�,�ii..t,�L, a'� kz�._ ��.a".`�"��. '�.' k�y`j�,
�,, J -� ��,�- "� s €: T �#. ; , r tsi rx� : ��� .��.y�
�a,++„�'�t•'.'L ,t� .. i r� �� r -Y '3 t : �+'t� Z + +v�?�'� ' * �:� �"F',� A,-eA
vcr?;�Z 14.. i ,+�: Y +t, a f� n � 'r �ti "� ._� -� .
9.r j �'i�� �5 TTaa,�' �k'u;,t i ,+�*d.':� �`..�a+.k` ��. } .� �tz, a,+t`��.� ..� rtiy '; .
�1. �� . � _ � � � { � ���/� �
���i. �`
����A,�_ .�!."�' �. . L :i •� �' j�-�,:,� i,�j�'Yt� f"w.tit��
,,�'��� �:1 ` � t � .. i �" ���,��r.:� �.Y�+.��';.�' 4" »�:;:�:Q
� Y ■���V v�•'��'"' �. .� Y: .�� �.�w .�.�i: �-�•- -. �?�r
��� �r� 3tt ,.fM1�'�,C�.� • ,- w���i ��(,��'',!k. �.��-��` ��,�S'
.� ��! :.a�friA�. .�/���'� ��,. 4�_� .1�i-�I'� !-'� . ` • � y
� � �'a!�. Rfi. ^ wn. • � M. • �t:�.'y �p;� �. �h . .��r�1�'��r.��
I� � r ,! '��I.��i`� �i����� �•��� • �'�..'�w r'��. �' +"�����`�4::�••v.A�
k � �` � ^ 'r ` '�..M�. M�.i. �'�•�'� �� i •' ';•': �•
�, �� ���f���� ,��s�'��,�•' ,�',5,�� ���.{V.�t�..�4`��::w�,{��' ��t:;l�yw,:y,�. �
tit � t; �e' .`�� ,.,. . . II�'' •�!!--�.ti .f • ��! �r 'w �_..�
� ( • Y �.`'. .� w '�•• ♦ `st ti•:-• .-••y , �y s�.+ o r
' / �7� � .���} �� �t• �' �' ��..• • .,� �4 �"�' L N i':�
�j� �� • �ik� ` .1� �^1C�., 1f Jf.''�w+M1 �Hi.. `„ _ - '•:~}»�. �.-��•..
,1tSf � �It�Na �� ��t ��;�f '�. •�'-. .; :�►'�}�:t'�� �' :;��Y �r �w
v ♦I!y► ♦ �A��� �
,��� ��; � ,, • �'s .. a�'► �. � . � ��{�y e�,. � �..� a .y�'•
r �� J�.. ;� • �? y� r�/ �.���; -z� �. r�• �f .'.�
, � +���t� "� 4 '��'�+ �'.:: � ,l'�.��
Ir' .��( r :�l!N.` �.i'��i. .r.`1.;�41t.�?+�/ � S"'i '� � � �:;rt �,. ���G'f
i t 4��M�`Sr�w�!•.. - . �'.�li..,x��� ,,,"r,��•�'��..q��/��;�,,+�,w�^"1i' -v � .�'•
�! � � \`�� ;s.�' , 3 �' �,•1'a�'� ti•�T`y.�,'�'�•'���l�rw� r"�'�''��}�+��f� `y�-
� r � �7�.w� MiM� '4""tlMi wf ♦a t�M$ + tT
� , ` � f,.
^�' 'Ft�'i� � i s 5�:�►•±!�ii1��r��"r"�`��,�,� 4.�i� ,+.�*�;.�� �.:w �
� ,� �°" F� I j��.� y ��4�,,. '!�. �.�>
�i.s � �:T; �'. .*`��,
, ; ,�� S�'� � �; �, �� ���:
� � � �. �..
� � '�� .� � r:,� ��.
��' � !t ' �
t �'� �` :;,� , •
�.. "".' .S � � :r ' �,,.i ..:,. v�:
���,�. �`�R �� �` �" :" T._
.'�� 1 �
�
.�,`s; � . '
i �
i !
�• �
r� •lY� -'1 C� M � �
� � ���;� �� F.� , ; ',�i
� I,� '
� r �.
� �� i ' �� � ■ � a -y,�,�. ,�t
� .`{• ��i
' �� ,��, • � �• � ti
� '� ti
�. , . � ��--.
.�� ; �� : ,. ��
. . * �
��`. � � � `�
�+� ..A� •��1. .�` r -:f� \ .�
;� � ! Y. �' • E
-�'' � � �` ;� '�' ^�� '. F -�
yi- , ! , � •� . " .• : t• • ' • �,=
;t� . _ �...t `�' �+t�� ;�...•. : •� � '� .
1 7'i. y l. `�� "., 4�. 1 .,. Y. � ` s ,i� i �t .�� �'
F•:., ; �:a t.�.s, ,.;�.:•. � , ;, ��=��«;+•• -r�
� � `i � � � y t 1. •.
• @
��.. � �,�\� .�\�:...it .y h,•j►�_ �„r ���sh�.�•;��+f'��.
.rif1 .
� .♦i� �,t��.%�.S�r�� '' "�i� �
q � -x'= �;�` '�`. , -
. " i�',.r��',-`Y4•.t. " :.,' 1: �; - .�c,�� 1 +w,t
.�(.'v '� 7.,,•r "�i�•� � �� ,: ::ii" .-r.
., i�., -:i� .l -s
"�4 �
�
�l f t .�
��` ,�,. �.�����3��,� ��.
'r �`i�� � � �.,►;�T '�,_, �(- w'� A �i ,i �
'a yi�'��. +� � kti►ti:�.;,;.y:ti��� ��•a,��t,. Q'�"',�7!-�`��,.�,..�,-�,:t�• .i
� A �t+. � ��-��(, '�• '�i. r-. • �i
r '!l �y` � . ...�� .��� A�'�'4�. .:/. f.
'! y � �Y �J`^' e� •�.��n':' >• t�.
�'� i. l+i,�'�y�;.. ;:�M:{.��:j���,'Fw. r,ti? �a;� �._?
:Y-y i '� `°• �iF::� �!�` i� ';c •�' 4 •�P�����0�
,��:.� _� '' �� . .����,�;A•�� �l-�����{ � •;�'�_.,: �-��v,;,..,`�
'�:- �.� '� '��i; K9�. ;h.�� .��:�,���� ;�•;tiC a.+�•` . K,�...
��:j� , •�'' � =s�y �: %i�:a'�,4:',�.` ��;,,,� �; �, `.���`� `ay. .
� � ♦} �• ..'� � M.
.. �`��. ,u� --�•yi � '`'�� s � � . ��
..�, ~ ��'� � �3 -��*'.��� if�;� � �1.��1 w.t ► � ,
`��� ` '�r y;�3�Lw .•ti1�',�..'1+ ` ,t �'�\4 i
y '4 •�i � �'�'��i�v►l=�+�y Ri i
� ��� � ��� ��* 3 �;�"'�:IT� h
, �t � • , '�, "�
'� +► � ��' - �`��• ��`
i �rb. �. ` • . r. `�,�'°.� .. ,;..::
y/.♦ �
-- �� + � ;� .�N_.. � ,. \ r�� � �.' Y L ' .,• t
l
,t I �R��.�� �_:.. � �� � � ,-.� }
�` � �' • r`�
, ��; '•
, � � �. � �a .�
. .
+: � � �.��^ �. �
� "^� ,,,,; �'� z ��l � �`T �`
.' + �r� �'. �
_ .4 � . � �1� � �'. M� J ��
.� "ft�, , ��! "# » I � ` � 't' �.
L��. � -�� � `.
�\��� � .. , ' ,,- ����'y • ���J, �• � ��
i ` { ; .� .. ��• � �"�. ��. ? y(;
�, � •.t N +
, W w •��"^ 1w��- � .��
' � � I •1 1 ��` � �._...,_�ca'�••-r..�. ��-t'• - � �.iC:�Ci'=1'�'...t. "�.'Fr .-��. ..�,t �r,��„'�i';:� � ,
, ,� , }� � t�_��....:.: � t •r � , V: � .
', 1_ I,`. .��i,: `.� --- p-'---.� yY� ` . ;��h�t s'4 i' �'.�`5C����^�r
{ �� F�'��--- '`�y Y�.., ;;�,�„ �-,� -�,�� •�
.,i ..��_ :+1� � _, (o���,r�S-_.:�x'�ti,,���- (`.i'�y���1�.�,�t��,s��'3�'s4:�"�����,•��`'�
1
� ,1 � ' � ,-x-�V •�� i/ � .b, � Y .7� i� �� \
•� �!���t�I fi� i��i,���'' -r J��; �,�j� �1,��,,:,,��`�t�� ��.��' �l 3`� �'�� ''�`�
'' ;� �:� ,�S x -1.: / r' ."`„"-� ���r C � (. / i�' a��j3 4 �`�ia'm 1 �JAi` `K,�c„'.�..�'��'"�i
' ' ���'�t ( `r r�� ��s �"T')3,e��� ,;? �r#��.35����j� �� �� � y��' -
�'�� I(< .S J' ) ( Y..-.� ..�' ~ .�� ��.1.�� �s '�Y r K J ; "7���r1��
r �" ��,�� '��T � � `�^'^.a-V zf�'^�`"� � v�{ �i��% '�'.�r�'�'•TiLr��`� i ��:`} ( ��..
�,. � d� ti �,� . -°Y "-�-`?;�, �.: ��5 �,� ��Y '��;�1'�t:.�':,{�a?'��� t rt„� -,,h �ti;
' ` '.}�. �1� •��.3����z�-'"�i��!r`' ��rL:�'�S-�,'-,{.,'�� � c�� -• .� �,... .� 7 ��`t
�� , �7 ,�.n. .��. ����i ,y- �wX�,'��.A r I l. rQ... '�J�.? t'��� i ,
' r 1 � Z-�� � �t 7 �i�i � � '��, � �:21 i ..�2� ��y{��
. i. �r� '`�����$+��.;+.�^�h�� Y�l�`����1��.7�)y`� ������JY���S'7 i�..�l�'Y.,�` {/t'��'T�-�
`� ��jj �'� asa� � �i� S ' �
• . ' � .��.;u�.�C .'�� lC C:.J���l�^ +��.'f� '-$�.a'`_if 'S�'.��'A J t�: 3����N X����� �
� t �' `!'t 1
�.�."'� �S f�l..��,�f.)��.._�.��--�5�,�%,�'���bY��.,r 4��. ��1 �s�.�� � �
. .���.��� nl��� m�� t�fl•�+ ,� Ysw��,�,j,��jr� ���i�T�`.y 3?� ��
> 1 '�l �. } �� t j� 1 1 _�y �-'c
�•5 • '1 �' :�';i���f;1�^�, _t'�1.���� C1,--T�1' �;��) `���������T.�'��I3.,- ajj't'�,',�U,�, i:;3+�•�s y .c.
••r�.1 i�S`i �"�.,+�� ;�i. 4J 1 't; S�•��s �''�%.3"6%°��`-+:I� -�?- �u �'�*^����.•., ,%�
-� � (1'`���,'��4r`�'� '1 � Sf�������J. �'i`�ti��7 ' `;i�r,*`,��3�`i£�='� ' - �'�.
� � ''�•' ._ }y. 1fC1��i �..�.�-t 'v �•(�l `,�r�`„ `�1 34k''F���,K�!������'�`i�,`�r�§�,�t�� Ca �y.\ .,.. `�' •.
� '�� ��J�l � �.�1 � r �.Y �( �< c� ��:�"`".'�j'�����.�k�.r ��f .�-a .
.r.7 ,ih..a� t �,j� ` �`� �',..`
.�� m ' Y11.' i;3'`t;n;`r' .�,1�1.,% ��� �����7-��r r��,Ya'�."'Y�;r� ,;,'�fSr�'Z�,2�.'' �'
- � � > �4 h �} � � ,�i•�a •� �?�
� , ��1,.{r.. r �� p r ,3J �{ f�. � �� �a�:,'� °�v-�'C l� • �.��a
'�,� � '• �i�j ��` ' � � 1�� �'i ` ` '--� ��,r �'��„ + ��^7�1 P� �r � �
• l � J) �1 ) )�l� �� 1 � f� �y�l v,� � � �
,' 1 ':i �t�Z�� t:'l�� t�4 �>>��kA;��.(9f� j�,; r -� �,��p:,5 ��..�r�.' I`'�Zr 9����'�•��p����
. �
�.� � , (��1�.�'� .�� �: �� y2 �. i a i"�\� � � �e L�-ry,��'�`����� S �'. 'r� ";t
,y � � ,L t ��\f� � < � �.j,� , �rX.,v .�,'�'� !�'�• i� �'�;�"
y�� '��i � +~� ,S�r'1 i� - _S � 1}� L�. � �7'�� ti��,�U •�l �.� •
1, . � �. �r ��- —t�� {�_'� 1�' _ -.�1�f + 'K Z�r� ,��4' �' .
•� O , ' '1��� � ^ ,-�_� - � 'n� /�r�i' �j• ;;�;� J,ai�j�/o '
�..�' I � . l �'_1'� '�. '��r l I, .f��:.'.s� ;�•r �tl
� •'ti�rY� ��. � ' ! `l• . ^�:� `t�^'r���•
r ��
� .!<`'�� + . ' '�.� �� ��/Ll� :� . . -.
�'0!.:,r�, . . � . �'\� -t 1 \`\ � �' SL��
.�rY'.. 1,��7 td:+a' �ISi3;� f. � ���
�,. : r; � ,�,j .�:• 4� f--�- �: �.
'ti �.V� . 9 �� ` ;�
�.'� 4L , •.;. ,�i, , �,�, �t �' ,
•':4 . {, ; ' � t. � .� .�.,�
, v }� a �,l � :.,�, , �.�6� ,:, ,� ..��:��:� .�
. '..�`} ,� ' , �I.: ^+ � `7 � f,c 1�+r+ �'��.t.� � �y
.: ,�;�,��' . m ��A� ��;,�. =^.�.�,I �� �', `' '� �`=����t��':
.x `tt � �� � '�:;...
- �J '�.�^.�; ' � � .�:t�� �'� � ��� ' ��� :� .
'� �'�' �/� '� �� �^.'rL
v' '•J r ;! � V1 S � ,� ,����t (;
_� �: ���:s�� � • � r ~� :� .. 1�� i' •r�%-t•- F
..?,. �c/;'���� � � f � ,`l' '���.,� ,yxJ`
^ ,•�� �. ._� �`�SY..`O
,�y �� . m , �� * � �� ,� _
4y��.�.:.� ' 't , . � •�,``::�"
:'' '••;�' �`. m ': i '� / =t� ' � �r �s
• .s �{.. . -���., � . . . � .�-
� �::� ' � ' •• ')' �;s'' _ y,�,•1� i�• :F�.,:c,�
.. �.;i;;�:� • , '.�_;`t�c... 7Y1,;. -•, ;:��,.y�.�,J..., �i�}��;�,�, Y+;��r ` j j�i { y/ , � ;+
�i `.i' - -. �.;� ' i�f •�iliii -f'T��� t{ �� � �. � '�.1 � Y.' �� t
.. 1r.{';,� .. r�• ;Ll�_�,i,�J.X 1•,i"'�'j�y�.� +a�"��''�� ,H.��1.Y,,�y'j r(•�J
� �' f� 1 (��r�� �If; ���� J �j p ���`, �� .y. , �. ��t. �1.��
i�' � .�I ,�t���a�s�AZ?;�, � �� \ ,,5�ti2�
y '.� �! i�"' 0 3O�Si{al�,','L; . �'
;' �'����1,',, , '!L L�f r'+� �'i ,����� ,' KY T ` - ;��"�
v it;�j,,: . ; �� ���)n�����,�` , �q �:;�
:•, � ,y,:;:�•.. , � ,,� .s� �x f�jl�.�•
'�° �:F���•:;a.� i �^ ��j,�-- -;��.t��Q�fy,��'!k � � ,� r• 'i:�t
ti� .�-.;'. '� pP i,'-,1`7- y�'�:` >����h4!'s���'S!-.,�, ��t� � , • �' Z�Y�°B
�l. �i�.'.'.i. '.ti- c'r!•�;••�.:.;��Y',fs�.•.1f; •lL � �� - � �i y
p' �t;tZ,�.."' � � y,.= ('�=-"�t:�ti''i�i'�:4�`.��r�?� •o-r.�� - (I •',� �,�-�����3'i '�,(t
l i :' , � f'�:, :S ?3- f�.;�.� ?• i
� `;: ,' ` •;i'. i;,�'f�zt; s:, •� �+ �,� • o��j,,� .Y
�� '�! r4 �-�*�-� w �� i,t � 1�.� 'C
.ni i 1 � � . �� e!� y� � ������.1''.�._? �j���` riL.. ��i.�.Aa �i'b .. �''�"'li
��'��'}� i ti I ,,\`t Vi°*i= '`.:-'iF',�� �•a,'�d(+' r tt F-d.'<�f �, '�i; +'. > �
%��"./�f;�, r v`� �'i_�'l.��4Y-�r \�°I'n � o :� -
,� �f�w' . � • . ��'ia4C I . �Y�e,��1'�`l��{���i•��. 'a',. ' `7 '� '� _� ''�\
�.�j�.���''t., , � t��� •�,.},*hSiC�\`.,IT,��l� � 1��,.�(� ���.��� ^�• � �•�a,,, 0 4� � L'•
l�'� �y✓;?�. ��' r � 7 L .9 p t''II,� �(�•�j� � "t�•'....-�iie� a �.
{!;:�„�,=i 1 1 r ,��' �.��J ��'L�v�t.�,.��.[-�'n;��., :�� r��t� � .��5 1 3',. ,�r(Q�•...,�
M1�3�i� .• 1 ,�, 7" �,e,•� � tit�`.-fi"�i�� `'yaSt ��;al�'�)/(�?���;i .����'y����i����yj''�N""+1�
::•" :,�,�;' . . A .es.'` � '��y ��)r V} � ����f.?.�` 1i���tT��i.��•�.?r� ;t�' Ly 't `��':f ;��,-
�'p2' .f; �,�,,3y���� l ;`, 4IE{�r,�,�T'.�s'i;�,���.,�>�.t�,2-.Z.}�� Y•', �Cl��4iy�, �
•!, � . �� ��<�— '�,�'� ry`�! ��,M,:v:�� J'.,1`jp'e�c,��i� ��`\.,_.l1�l',•.,j�44� � _��3;�� �T�.Y�`•'�.:,' t
�, .:��3 ' / ;�. . � V'� �+' 9 i^�Z. - � ,��l����,?>��.�srti�-i t�..[� 1T��f� ����lt ���Yq � _.-�
�� �.�'�� 1i ��i +.Y� �rt'�?.� i� � � r .v �F .� .�..
' • .' i f -� .��.... �pj� �'2/1 � r '�.t J1 -S��J{�S ��� � �1� ���ji �',.�`A��4 ^� �i l��G�4`�y��a1
;� �� i ...� '�J , �"���L�1f�\'(r T 'I �lY� ��`1)ilyl�.S.v�4�t�� ��+.�"���Y•.�.1 ��k.���Y .�,l��ti �\�.\
. .. �i. +r �'Lrt* Z,,�� +� r4 � ihi�iL�,-��.,1'' �, ,i i���E + �t�'' ,` ..
��'' ,� ' �,'� ���.�. �f;�,.�1lZZ�,,.j-., e��v., ad���`o � � r���+-` ��4y� .....-.^�1�..
�t' 'c n� o�t'-�-�- - i `1 /,J nr. ..� :.Y �.� �• 1�"� ���iti���'-�Z �7'���2�..�._:•J
} � dn <�`'� �_- •�� < :!n� � '�+S ��` '�' `�`��..� ft, �+a� 5�;2.1'�`��A� �r , l.�\
�; �.,,li�i �•.�" C✓I•� .� • ;?�� '. • � h� �\����,,r t �,. I�` ail �� .. � �t �t;. � ��1��4..� p ��.,�35•
f'� •��=' f�� �� �/ ;t 1 •' � t ` �U��� �.'* , a �C,a����t�ir:-� �1..�- �41.t��..,,r(��y
t�. �;` .. i, �,�. � _.V�"�"7�.��� tr 4/,�v�t'�: `� S� �� Snt� `� � ��� ���;��,�,1���a`k}}�,n;�i-�� t �'��Z
Y , i�- •. C1 `f .-.� �. �� •-7.�. �
S.�j> . i ;� . � .-.a " � �; ��• �4 �1��1 ���, �y ��'; rr��� �� ZK� ��;�+ r�! �''��i��Gi.�,p
),Y y n n -4 C.� �f' � ,� e�p u 7:.t �s i:J,:,: � t�u � ti�� ,r,,-• t � i.� '� r�i .5 � �k'`.�� �t
i. �:1-�'` \ �.' �'� ; ��:."�'..��.._:-.--�i.-e � � �� �i,`' 0•,� ' S'��j '��,,, �a, y��`'�,, ��� � "Y'�� a 1
' ��' J��(.����� ��, ��•'a����_ � V`�� 1 .� � ~ � �'y� '•� -�"`�.'�"".���;� � .\'V4O�'f�•1
`S�� �� 1 �`N t, � \�`�-.d � � �`>. ��, l �f�,j ' �L � Lc�} '�{ �"` �� `� =:�`,
:v �, �`� � .9 � .,,�' ,�' �� �•.• • � `F � ���-t� � },� �
..,-�'r �'` 2..Cf,.�;���i' y°•�:d -e� �%� �,ti oi. .. .--�9 ��y,��\ �o �y� ti �ti. �'��i ���� l�`1 � I.�.• � ��i
�`r+� ` �..�` �' "'�< �'� "`"`7' ' �. '`�t � � ���[� �o`°?����,,,,`` � `'��;� )�,��1 �c�� )'
�.-� C)},`�� ,<�•t� ,. t:� �=c�Z�n i--i�-bw,r �.}.' � � .�b �c,i)�� .�� 'a1�J.- ��'•.9 �• � �'��`�`.�
,�� . 4� `1 i. Y,. T:, tiD Y' 4 _"�l�
` ;�1. ,{,� � � �� .> . �'., , �.. f,..� 4:f�.�:�A�.1,^ � vH `. L��� YYt T�, Y` }
`1. -�.�!�Y /� \� K S�L Y,��� I. .i!n`�(� `I~. . ,Y�. � � ".L . � .�. :.
f�t�c�`:w�'}��"��f�e1 i�f�.�,�,��y�� �;> l,�. .��;`�,t S '.��'`��`� e��.�1.�`' �"`a�,�,�{ '� .N.•��o".:..
(��J'�� �3�t J'���•'°'�� P, '"`� .1 r-..'},V�._.�.-�;,..�:v ,��,,;,�3'� �' yQ i.��'�.�'��.:�� c�p`�c��� ,y'��`i
a:, � t r:����t.�:� ,�%'� �...:. ._ _. ._ � ._��� �a�•;:�; �{ . ., o� ,.� .z,�a.
�� �5���.� 'l-.G)^ �. `�,• ��t(��„_�.��'�;�-- �T=�-.�.,1 ti `,'`�„��•'�d-`;t;�������,�_p o ?••.w . .. �
7 a 2 d. �,�-�, �``��}� �.' ,`.,�...
. ` �, c�?°e ry ���I��'� `� \�i� �e�1•:�`.a�-�°��it'v�� - NP:� ; �'�.i • �b '_ .C:.�":�a "r.
+• F.l n tS•.r.i.li �\ r.'.� ;tt ..• . til _ x.., . •
_ . ,. � �
EMPLOYMENf GENERATION RATES
EXHIBIT A
SUGGEST'ED ETII'LOl'I�fENT CATEGORIES AIv'D RA2�TGES FOR VAIL
ExPxESSED AS ErirLOYEES PER lOOO SQUARE �E"r
RRC RES�axcx
OVERALL SUGGESTED
AVERAGES RANGE
Bar/Restaurant 5.7/1Q00 s.f. 5-8/1000 s.f.
Retail and Service Commercial 5.9/1000 5-8/1000
Retail: Grocery/Liquor/Convenience 1.8/1000 1.5-3/1000
Office: Real Estate 7.6/1000 6-9/1000
Office: Financial 3.1/1000 2.5-4/1000
Office: Professionai/Other . 6.6/1000 5-8/1000
Conference Center .______ NA 1/1000
Health Club � NA • 1-1.5/1000
L.odging* 1.3/room .25-1.25/room
Local Government 6.5/1000 S-8/1000
Construction (Offices, Interior Storage, etc.) 10.6/1000 9-13/1000
. Multi-Family N/A 0.4lunit
Single Family N/A 0.2/unit
Other: To be determined through the SDD '
process, upon submission of adequate
documentation and a review of the application
materials.
* Lodging/accommodations has particularly large variation of employees per room, depending
upon factors such as size of facility and level of service/support facilities and amenities provided.
The standards present a wide range of employment, but it is anticipated that a definitive report
wiil be submitted by ea�h lodging property requesting an expansion, which would then be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
ROSALL RII��fEN CARES PAGE 6 „
� � . .' , .
• EXHIBIT B
SUBDIVISIONS �
�
C. Plans and descriptions showing how the following will be
performed:
l. All site work shall be brought up to current town
standards unless a variance therefrom is granted to the
applicant by the town council in accordance with the
variance procedures of this Title 17. The town council
may, if it deems necessary, require additional parking
facilities to meet requirements of owners and guests of the
condominium units,
2. Corrections of violations cited in the condominium
conversion report by the building inspector,
3. Condominium projects shall meet current Uniform Build-
ing Code requirements for heat and fire detection devices
and systems.
(Ord. 29 (1983) § 1: Ord. 2(1983) § 1 (part).)
17Z6.075 Condominium conversion.
Any applicant seeking to convert any accommodation unit
within the town shall comply with the requirements of this �
section. The requirements contained in this section shall not
apply to structures or buildings which contain two units or less.
A. The requirements and restrictions herein contained shall be
included in the condominium declaration for the project,and
filed of record with the Eagle County clerk and recorder.The -
condominium units created shall remain in the short term
�v�t tt-ts-ss� 298-4 �
` � � •
� � •
r
MEMORANDUM �� ��,,, � ��P
i
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 19, 1993
SUBJECT: A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor subdivision
request, a zone change request and a request for an encroachment into
View Corridor No. 1 for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House,
located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and Tract
E, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium
Association/Vail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners,
Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
On October 11, 1993, the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) recommended
approval of the Golden Peak House. The vote was unanimous (7-0). The PEC's motion for
approval did not include the applicant's request to add a retractable enclosure over a portion
of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck. The PEC's recommended conditions of approval
included the following:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant agree to restrict, and place into the
short-term rental program, the lock-offs associated with Units 305 and 306
when the owners are not on-site utilizing these units.
2. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor
retail windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan,
which does not include the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of
the building, be reviewed and included in the final design, if required by the
Design Review Board.
3. That the applicant further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights.
4. That the Design Review Board carefully review the roof form over the main
entry, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
5. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
1
. , .. � �
6. That the applicant contribute a total of $32,000 towards the redevelopment of
Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards the redevelopment of Seibert
Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a future
special improvement district be created for this project.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant agree to restrict, and place into the
short-term rental program, the two proposed accommodation units (numbers
309 and 312) when the owners are not on-site using these units.
8. Prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the project, the applicant,
or Vail Associates (co-applicant), shall dedicate open space to the Town of Vail.
The amount of open space shall be an area equivalent to, or exceeding, the
area of the Tract E "overhang and deck easement" and the area of the new
sidewalk to be located on Tract E, approximately 2,145 square feet.
9. That the applicants agree to dedicate to the Town of Vail, a public pedestrian
easement, across Lot C. This shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a
Building Permit for the project.
2
. �
. • ' �
� � E �� P �
Andy Knudtsen made a presentation per the staff inemo and stated that staff could not
find any unusual circumstances on this site that would justify granting the requested site
coverage variance. He said that staff was recommending denial of this request for a site
coverage variance.
Steve Riden stated that the applicant felt that this was the only alternative that they had
in order to develop the property.
Bill Anderson stated that he did not believe that a hardship did exist on this site and that
granting a site coverage variance would be a grant of special privilege.
Greg Amsden stated that he agreed with the staff inemo.
Diana, Jeff, Allison and Dalton stated that the all agreed with Bill and Greg.
Diana Donovan made a motion to deny this request for a site coverage variance per the
staff inemo with Bill Anderson seconding the motion. A 7-0 vote denied this request.
3. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C,
Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Kristan Pritz made a presentation per the staff inemo and stated that the applicants have
made several modifications to this proposal since it was last presented to the PEC in
December of 1992 and January of 1993. She stated that most of the above grade floor
area had been removed from the easement area. However, she stated that there was 71
square feet that was still located in Tract C. She said that the fifth floor condominium had
been reduced in size and the building had been pulled back approximately 9 to 12 feet
in this area on the north. She said that Streetscape improvements are now a part of the
proposal (i.e. pavers, additional landscaping to Seibert Circle). She said that the
applicants felt that two additional employees would be needed as a result of this project.
She stated that this request included essentially five components: an SDD request, a
request for an exterior alteration in the CCI, a request to encroach into View Corridor #1,
a request to rezone a portion of Tract E, and a request for a minor subdivision. She
stated that the staff felt that there are many positive aspects of this project but that staff
still felt that the view corridor encroachment, sun/shade, employee housing, loading and
delivery, streetscape improvements and architectural detailing on the east, north and west
elevations, are still issues. Kristan summarized by saying that the main concerns that
staff still had with this project pertained to the bulk and mass of the proposal, particularly
the view corridor encroachment and shade on Seibert Circle.
Planning and Environmental Commfssion
August 23, 1993 3
. �
. � � •
Clark Willingham stated that the majority of this proposal would be imperceptibie from the
Vail Transportation Center. He stated that the only square footage generated from this
proposal would occur from the addition of the fourth and fifth floors. He stated that he felt
that this proposal would make this area "more user friendly". Pedestrian areas are
improved. He noted that Public Works did not want to see pavers in the "ski corridor" in
befinreen the Golden Peak House and the Hill Building. He said that this proposal would
improve the ski base facility. He felt that this proposal did meet all of the criteria outlined
on Pages 18 - 20 of the staff memorandum. Concerning sun/shade, he felt that this
proposal did not negatively impact sun/shade. With regard to employee housing, he
stated that Vail Associates was planning for an additional two employees as a result of
this proposal but that no other new employees were being proposed in conjunction with
this development. In respect to the view corridor encroachment, he hoped that the PEC
would set a precedent so that people will be able to redevelop and improve the Village.
Clark stated that slivers of view would be removed on the east building because of
existing encroachments. He mentioned that the architectural detailing will be similar to
the Bell Tower Building.
Craig Snowdon showed the PEC members a number of drawings showing various aspects
of the Golden Peak House proposal
Allison Lassoe inquired what would happen to the rest of Tract E.
Clark Willingham stated that it would remain Tract E which is zoned Agricultural Open
Space and that he was unable to purchase the entire Tract E from Vail Associates.
Dalton Williams inquired of staff whether any of this project was outside their property line.
Kristan Pritz responded that there was 71 square feet in the easement area but that the
applicant will purchase this area from Vail Associates and make it part of the Golden Peak
property. She stated that the PEC and staff had previously been concerned with projects
that purchase property merely to build more area into the easement but that this was not
the case with this request except for the 71 square feet.
Bill Anderson inquired whether any alternatives had been proposed where the proposed
elevator would be located (i.e. center of the building) in order to maintain the view of Riva
Ridge ski run.
Clark gave the background on how this area had been reduced.
Diana Donovan inquired whether there are any other substantial chimneys or mechanical
vents being proposed that are not shown on the drawings presented to the PEC.
Craig Snowdon stated that there would be a restaurant fan for Los Amigos which is shown
on the elevation.
Bill Whiteford, on behalf of the owner of Cyrano's, inquired how the east end of the
Golden Peak House would be changed as a result of this proposal.
Planning and Environmental Commission
August 23, 1993 4
. ' � .
Craig Snowdon explained how the existing deck at that location was proposed to be
altered.
Jim Lamont, East Vail Homeowners Association, stated that he was concerned that the
approval of this request by the PEC would be precedent setting in respect to the minor
subdivision and also expressed concern about the covenants.
Kristan Pritz stated that staff looked at these type of proposals on a case by case basis
and that they felt there were some distinctions with this proposal, such as the roof
overhang easement and existing encroachments which made it acceptable to allow for the
subdivision. She said that per the Town Attorney, staff is not responsible for enforcing
covenants in which the Town of Vail is not a party to and that staff had encouraged the
applicant to address any covenant issues before the project was finalized.
Jim Lamont stated that the response from the East Village Homeowners Association has
not been favorable towards the project. He said that they were opposed to any SDD that
exceeded what the zoning provided for. He said that this was a key view corridor and that
he did not want to see only slivers of this view corridor remain. He said that the Golden
Peak House was already over its height limit and that it should not be allowed to increase
any higher. He said that commercial square footage is also a concern. Jim said that
these trade-offs of GRFA to get employee housing were not really adding anything. He
said that the streetscape improvements were not sufficient. He said that there was a lot
of private interest to improve Seibert Circle.
Greg Amsden inquired whether there have been past proposals to encroach into View
Corridor #1.
Kristan Pritz stated that the Red Lion Building had previously had an encroachment or in
this case an amendment to the view corridor but that this was prior to the current
ordinance being in place.
Greg Amsden commented that he does not have any problems with the east half of the
building. He said that he was concerned with the view corridor encroachment on the
western end of the building. He said that he would like to see the ridge line on the west
end of the building minimized. He stated that as it was presently proposed, that it still
seemed massive.
Diana Donovan stated that the view corridor encroachment as it relates to the western
portion of the Golden Peak House was still a concern. The view up Bridge Street is also
a concern. She stated that the view corridor is not just a point but also a view corridor
that is seen from different public areas. She might be able to support the eastern
encroachment given the criteria. She was concerned that when the Cyrano's site is built
out that people will not be able to see the mountain at all. She felt Tract E was still a
concern as she believed this land should be dedicated as Open Space.
Planning and Environmental Commission
August 23, 1993 5
. �
. ' � �
Bill Anderson stated that he was impressed with the applicanYs ability to redesign this
building. He stated that the view corridor encroachment was a significant issue and that
he was wondering whether there was a way to preserve the notch in the center of the
building to allow for the Riva view.
Dalton Williams stated that he is not prepared to approve this project as it is proposed
unless major changes are made. He stated that this proposal is worsening a
nonconforming situation with regard to height. He stated that he could see no benefit to
the Town except that the building would be attractive. He stated that he felt that this
proposal was removing the view of sensitive natural features of the Town. He said that
he does not feel that this proposal has significant public benefit that outweighs the
requested deviations to the zoning code. He also felt the architect and developer had
both worked hard to address the many concerns with the project.
Allison Lassoe stated that she agreed with the other members' comments concerning the
view corridor. She stated that if there is not a view corridor at this location, it would be
the same as a dead end. She commented that although the present building is not
aesthetically or architecturally pleasing, it is sensitive to the view of the mountain.
Jeff Bowen stated that the existing design of the building was specifically done in 1966
to maintain the view of the mountain. He stated that the present design will create more
shade on Bridge Street as well as wipe out the view of the mountain. Jeff stated that
another component of the SDD criteria is that the proposed SDD must comply with the
underlying zoning and that he felt that the building going from 42 feet to 49 feet is too
much of a departure from zoning. He added that the proposed GRFA and site coverage
were also excessive. He stated that he felt that the proposed employee housing at Pitkin
Creek was not adding any additional employee housing for the Town of Vail. In summary,
he said that this building was too big. He said that he felt that the existing two-building
approach was better. He did not feel that given these concerns he could support this
project.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she agreed with Jeff's and Dalton's comments concerning
the SDD criteria. She added that if you consider the view corridor encroachment criteria,
she felt that this proposal did not meet any of the criteria. She said that the Master Plan
proposed that this building be three to four stories high and that the proposal was at four
to five floors.
Craig Snowdon stated that he had a hard time seeing this building as a three to four story
building at present with its mansard roof.
Kathy Langenwalter asked Tom Moorhead how the PEC should interpret the five view
corridor criteria.
Tom Moorhead stated that the PEC needed to be consistent with the implications of the
view corridor criteria.
Planning and Environmental Commission
August 23, 1993 6
• •
Kristan Pritz stated that the criteria guide to the PEC's decision-making and that the PEC
must use the criteria when deciding whether to approve or deny the view corridor
encroachment.
Greg Amsden asked for clarification on each PEC member's opinion on the view corridor
encroachment. He stated that he can accept an encroachment into the view corridor but
that he would like to see it minimized as much as possible. He stated that he feels that
the view encroachment on the west side needs to be reduced and that the east side is
acceptable as proposed.
Diana Donovan stated that the eastern end meets the criteria. She stated that the middle
portion of the building needs to be completely out of the view corridor and that the west
end of the building needs to be minimized and that some compromise may be possible
in this area.
Bill Anderson stated that he agreed with Diana's comments and that he was mainly
concerned with the view corridor encroachment in the west end of the building and the
middle of the building.
Dalton Williams stated that he was not in favor of putting an extra floor on the buildings.
He said that he would like to see gable roofs. He said that he would like to see this
proposal get out of the view corridor. He feels that the proposal as it currently stands, is
increasing a nonconforming situation. He advocated no encroachments in the notch and
would consider the east side view. However, as proposed, the west half of the building
is unacceptable.
Allison Lassoe stated that she would like to see the west portion of the building lowered.
She agreed with Dalton's comments concerning the roof and the extra floor.
Jeff felt that there was no hardship and the view corridor request did not meet the criteria.
Diana Donovan stated that she would have a hard time approving any view corridor
encroachment on the west side of the building. She stated that she understood that it
would be difficult to reduce the west end to the degree necessary for her to support the
project given the developer's goals. She stated that she appreciated the applicant's
efforts and hard work on this project.
The PEC concurred that Craig and Clark had worked hard to address all off the planning
issues. They thanked the applicants for their efforts.
4. A request for a worksession for proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt
and Natural Open Space District, and Chapter 18.32 Agricultural and Open Space District,
of the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
Planning and Environmental Commission
August 23, 1993 7
` �:J,'� ����
�ARTNERS, LTD. � ` -
278 Hanson Ranch Road One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606
Vail, Colorado 81657 Dallas, Texas 75219-4471
303 476-5667• FAX 303-476-0470 214 523-3706• FAX 214 523-3929
���
��
�
�
September 3, 1993
6
1 �1�-
,�''� ���.� -
�;
TO : Golden Peak House Owners �
FROM : Clark S. Willingham
The Town of Vail Planning Staff has altered our approval process schedule.
The new schedule is as follows:
September 13th 2:00 p.m. Planning Commission Work Session
September 27th 2:00 p.m. Planning Commission Vote
September 28th 1:00 p.m. Town Council Work Session
October Sth 7:30 p.m. Town Council First Reading and Vote
October 19th 7:30 p.m. Town Council Second Reading and Vote
We all need to encourage our supporters to either attend these meetings or write letters of
support.
, ��i
.
� �,
9-Z 7• �3 (�d�- �-e.�-� 1�`��-e ` l��C- �a�fr,��s-�oY�
iii
�OJ2 ��� � �C�� _ i
_ ��� �_�a� -
�
- —=—���.....1�
-- - '�— �� 5F c.��- . -_� �t��:,-_ �
. .
------ -- — --�'�- --
._ 7 e� - •
�
— /��c�' � �YZ P�w�t
.
� �
_�— * —
a � � S
_ _ .
� — — r
0
�
r
�;
�
� �^�A �,
�- _ ,n �
IY
� � �
m;�, .. . � . .. �#-Y,_,
. ' } � � �
, z
�,��-fl.- T�- ��� a��- �� ���
�� �- -a�--�---�-��---A -__---
- - - _ _�.��,., �
- ��__�_ �_
- --
� -� - ------- _ _--- --- -
- - - ----- --------------
-- -=---�- -�-_�..,..�_.,.�!_ - � ����,_ � �-�_? —
-- ----------
_
_-- - -y�'.!-��u� -- - - d ��-��-!�t-_— — -
-- �-� _�,/��-�� o._. , /7���_�� 7
--�>�p�----�.--� --? --�-��'��-.�-�-- --------
- ��-------3 �- � �,��... � ,� .
�
- - �� . . �� _ ,,
--� -
� �__�e L,('�._'2_�; �__ _ ��
'���- ---
_ - ,�.-�_ �n�-� -�� �_ dr�. --
_--- -- -_-_ ____ __-----
----- ` , _ ��---------� ------
v '
- �_--�--G�--�-�-- ' --�-� G-��.�-�e --
.
-----_----- �-�- -- ---- --- -
� •
MEMORANDUM
'�A� :;�'°' ���
' � .. _ �
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 13, 1993 (Revised September 27, 1993 - all changes are
indicated in bold type)
SUBJECT: � A request for a worksession for the establishment of a Special
Development District, a CCt exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a
zone change, and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for the
Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2
and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville,
Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
.........:...... ..........:... ......,............,,....».,.,. ...:................,...:... , ..,...».
.::: ..:::::::::::::::: ::::.�::::.:::.,.::.:::...:..:.::._:.:::::::::::. .�.:::::.�.�.�:;.:.:.:::.:�.::>.::;.:;, :::.::........ ...
..............................................................v.:...1........v...:v�4.�:::vw:::n_.�:::::::T::•:.�::::::�::::v.�:::v.......:. ................ :::.
.......................................................................�....... ... . ...........::�::::.....:•:::........... ......::::��:................... .......iv:::........�
I. DESIGN MODIFICATIONS MADE TO THE PROJECT SINCE THE AUGUST 23. 1993
PEC WORKSESSION
As a result of the September 13th PEC worksession, the applicant has made
modifications to the Golden Peak House redevelopment proposal. The purpose of this
memorandum is to provide updated information to the PEC with regard to the changes.
The applicant would like feedback from the PEC with regard to the changes. The final
PEC review, and vote, will occur on October 11th.
The original staff memorandum to the PEC, which includes the staff's detailed analysis
of the project, is attached to this memo for background information. Please note that
this original memo has not been updated to reflect the changes outlined below. In
addition, the draft minutes from the September 13, 1993 worksession are included in
the PEC packet.
The specific modifications made to the project are listed below:
•Fourth Floor Roof - Modifications have been made to the fourth floor of the proposed
Golden Peak House. Specifically, the western portion of the structure has been pulled
back from Bridge Street approximately 16 to 18 feet. In this area, the roof ridge has
been reoriented so that it would now run east to west. The benefit of this change is
that portions of Vail Mountain, as viewed from the upper Bridge Street area, would be
more visible.
�
� �
The proposed fourth floor reconfiguration woutd reduce the additional shading in the °°
Seibert Circle area. The proposed building shadow line at the winter solstice �"`
(December 21 st) would be reduced by approximately 0-12 feet. The proposed building
shadow line at the equinox (March/September 21st) would also be reduced. This is
indicated on Sheet A-15, Site Plan - Sun/Shade Analysis.
•Fourth Floor GRFA - By pulling the fourth floor back from Bridge Street, the applicant
has proposed to shift some of this GRFA into the "overhang and deck" easement area
(Tract E) along the south side of the building. The staff has calculated that
approximately 410 square feet of GRFA would now be located in this easement area.
This is indicated on Sheet A-10, fourth floor plan.
Due to the change in the fourth floor layout, the GRFA for the project has been slightly
decreased. The fourth floor would now have a total of 5,243 square feet of GRFA,
which would be a reduction of 321 square feet of GRFA from the previous proposal.
The amount of common area on the fourth floor has also been reduced by
approximately 72 square feet. With regard to densiry (number of units), there would
still be four dwelling units located on the fourth floor.
•Third Floor Architectural Details - Only minor modifications have been made to the
third floor plan. On the western end of the north elevation, the applicant has proposed
some minor window modifications and h�s also included a "false" bay window. These
are the only changes proposed at this level.
•Fifth Floor Central Area - There are no square footage changes proposed for the
fifth floor, however, the south facing exterior deck has been reconfigured so that it no
longer projects over the central portion of the structure. This change also helps to
open up views to Vail Mountain from the upper Bridge Street area. This is indicated
on Sheet A-11, fifth floor plan.
II. SUMMARY
As listed in the previous staff memorandum to the PEC, the following is a list the staff has
identified as issues and concerns:
1. View Corridor Encroachment (View Corridor #1)
This issue has been discussed above.
2. Sun/Shade Analysis
This issue has been discussed above.
2
� • •
�
� 3. Employee Housing
The staff thought it would be helpful to further define the employee housing
issue regarding the Golden Peak House. As we have previously indicated in
our memorandum to the PEC (dated August 23, 1993), the staff has calculated
the incremental increase of the number of employees that the proposed
redevelopment would create. This analysis was completed utilizing the
Employee Housing Report, prepared for the Town of Vail by the firm of Rosall,
Remmen and Cares as well as the Employment Generation Rates, also
prepared by Rosall, Remmen and Cares (dated June, 1991, revised December
1991). In summary, the staff estimates that the Golden Peak House
redevelopment would create a need for five to ten additional employees. This
range is due to the housing multiplier that varies from 0.15 to 0.30. The 0.15
housing multiplier is suggested to be utilized when projects are under density.
The 0.30 housing multiplier is recommended for use when projects are over on
density. The existing and proposed Golden Peak House is over on density.
Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit to be provided, it is
possible to calculate up to two employees per bedroom. For example, for a
two-bedroom unit in the size range of 450 to 900 square feet, it is possible that
this unit would be capable of accommodating up to four employees. A two-
bedroom unit, with a size less than 450 square feet, would only be considered
capable of supporting one employee per bedroom. The applicant is proposing
to provide one two-bedroom condominium unit of 906 square feet in size,
thereby accommodating up to four employees. The staff is of the opinion that
one additional two-bedroom employee housing unit should be required to
mitigate the impacts of the incremental increase in the numbers of employees
that the Golden Peak House redevelopment would create.
Since the September 13th PEC worksession, the applicant has agreed to
provide one additional two-bedroom employee housing unit as a part of
the redevelopment. According to the analysis above, two two-bedroom
units (in the 700-1,000 square foot range) would provide housing for up to
eight employees. The staff believes that with this additional unit the
proJect would now satisfy the Town's employee housing requirement.
The additional dwelling unit would be located off-site, however, the exact
location of the unit has not yet been identified.
4. Streetscape Improvements/Landscaping
Since the previous PEC worksession, the applicant and the staff have met
on-site and have agreed to specific modifications regarding the project's
landscaping and streetscaping. The applicant's redesign would now
include the following:
3
• � �
�
•Three of the existing four large evergreen trees, located in the
skier access west of the building, would be relocated onto Tract E.
These trees would be relocated north of the Pirate Ship Park area
and immediately north of the Town's recreation path. The fourth
evergreen is not proposed to be relocated because of its poor
� condition.
•The existing aspen located at the southwest corner of the Golden
Peak House would also be relocated onto Tract E. Due to the
tree's close proximity to the building and the configuration of the
tree's root system, it may not be possible to relocate this aspen
without significant damage to the tree. The condition of the roots
will not be known untii excavation of the root ball has begun.
However, if the tree cannot be relocated, then the applicant has
agreed to install two new 3-inch caliper aspen trees onto Tract E.
•A permanent stone-faced pianter would be added in the skier
access immediately adJacent to the western elevation of the
building. The type of rock used for this planter would match the
stone that is in place in the Seibert Circle planter, as well as the
existing pianters along upper Bridge Street. The planter wall would
be approximately 1&24" in height, with a stone cap, so it could be
used for seating. A 25 to 30-foot tall specimen blue spruce would
be added to this planter.
•A flagstone or brick paver walkway would be added along the
south side of the Los Amigos deck to provide for pedestrian
access along the south side of the building.
•The existing fire hydrant, which is located immediately off of the
southwest corner of the building, would be relocated into the new
planter described above. This would remove the hydrant from the
pedestrian area.
•The applicant has agreed to make a financial contribution to the
redesign of Seibert Circle. The exact dollar amount has not yet
been indicated.
5. Architectural detailing (east, north and west elevations)
The applicant has agreed to incorporate many of the architectural
changes to the building that the staff and PEC suggested at the previous
worksession. These changes included revisions to the roof (eliminating
the south-facing vertical element on the western portion of the building),
adding "retail windows" to the west elevation (along the skier access) and
further articulating the first floor "retail windows" by adding divided lights.
4
,� • • '
1
� 6. GRFA located in the "overhang and deck" easement area
As discussed extensively at previous PEC worksessions during late 1992 and
early 1993, the staff has expressed concerns regarding the addition of floor
area located in the "overhang and deck" easement areas. At the January 1993
PEC worksession, the applicant had modified the redevelopment plans to
remove all GRFA within the "overhang and deck" easement areas. The staff
and the PEC had expressed specific concerns regarding the south easement
area, due to the fact that this property is currently zoned Agricultural and Open
Space. The current redesign now calls for additional floor area (GRFA) to be
located within this easement area.
At the previous PEC worksession, the Commission was comfortable with
the additional GRFA proposed to be located within the easement area,
with the understanding that the applicant would work with Vail Associates
regarding the dedication (of at least an equal amount) of open space to
the Town. It was suggested that the Mill Creek stream tract or the Pirate
Ship Park area of Tract E be dedicated as permanent open space.
7. Los Amigos Deck - Upon completion of the last PEC worksession, Ron
Riley, one of the co-applicants in the redevelopment, indicated to staff
that he would like the PEC to consider a partial enclosure over the Los
Amigos outdoor dining deck, on the south side of the building. The staff
understands that the request would include a glass, plexi-glass or canvas
covering over the deck, and that the covering would be at least partially
retractable. Ron and Craig Snowdon will provide the details of the
proposed enclosure at the PEC meeting on Monday.
8. Development2oning Statistics -
a) The redevelopment project would further exceed the CCI
development statistics and the existing conditions, in the following
categories:
•Building Height
•Density - GRFA
•Site Coverage
b) The redevelopment proJect would be brought more into
compliance, than the existing building, in the following zoning
categories:
•Common Area
•Density - Number of Units
5 '
• • •..
�
c) Although the existing project does not meet the loading standard,
the�redevelopment proJect wouid not increase or modify the
requirement. The project would continue to lack the required one
loading berth.
c:�pec�ne mos�goidpk.913
6
� `" O(]VtJOIt`� ' IIVA r
ar. +�.yw� . • fBHt/8 � Q
""°� "°�°"°° 1300W3�1 3Sf10H ��►3d N3al0�J zo�s -�-w�'
�..�,..,��.�.«�
�� �
�� �-
i� ; �
, �: , o ,�
� � �
� .. �� — ` < . � 3}8
� • � I ��; a � ��9
\; �,.' �. .
. r' � �, � � � ZZ3
-- � �. ' �� �5>
,y � , . 3 °' '
�
� �
� �
/ ~ \ �,�,� '�e &\� � \� \•� ��
/ � <-. � ����� �� '�� !�, \ �,-� �� �
� / ,v-y `�_=1 /
_ r . � � 3���: ; �' � o s \,\��/�� \ f
.
N O � /' ` � ._
� . � J , \\ � � �� /� \ �
< m `�' �. � , � � � ' �� � ,m�.
U / . 1
Y � \� � � �r �`� . \ f
/ � � � �
��� � 1
/ ` � ��� t
�
�. . � ��g �C� �� �� \
4� t ��
� „'���` \ \
� �, ^
. �_ � �
�:. �M1� �\\� \ 3 � ' �� ���
r z Z '� ��g � � • � \ �ur�wn
� ,,, _ -� ` � f �.0
:� � p �� '! �3�\ W Y i � �f `#F � I �� —
c •`Q \
.W C Y �� i ' 1 N � � �� f �� —�
1
�C� � .� I' '�� d Wd �
\ `� 0 �
i �
y� � 1 r� � L W ' �� 3 � .
. � O\ ��I I \` � � 1� � � � � .
I'
,- � �e � �\ _� a �, �. � � �,t u_ � �
` >��� �; •; "� � \ /�
. t 3 � � � '_, �#� �. iE - J
> Q � :'� �i�� �t� � s$3 �� � �� �
/ � �i 35: � �
. � � �� zp � p� � /
, a�, . �� "
��\ �� u ta�� , _�_ —� t� /� —
� —�—
\��, ,P \\ �uJ�u+ali�uni,\
1 -i.�..�#�-- — F-���_ -- -- -- _
� ` / �%> � �-� � �, �� � ����.��/ 11
� ���.%�. �� e �\�� . 1
'" � \��. g � �
\ .J, � �S '1
_ �� � � \�� � ' �
=
� � �
o r � � a
j ��F � ,�� \ (J ,
s � •y� 1
� 3F� —, \1�, \� � 1
��� � ������� �� � ��
�,�___—� I �
�, , �
� � � � � � : .
,��1 � F :
� c
�
0 • �
�
� I �, _ _�w I � �oavao�o�� ���idn � �e,�E,9 ,� N _
+v �.�-� l3aOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3QlOJ � a (
� jOtB ��a^�' •
r
i ��
i �{
� . 3
�
� �1 '�_ �
� �� � � '
� � � s � �
K � � � � � - �
�
i �� � .
; �
-, Z
' S
a
-- - �
�W
. . � W
< .
, �� m ,
��t a . �� Z �
� '�� . � W '
• Y;�
� r
. � �
i
.�—��
i -
� ��L- : 'z
� �� ' J
a
��
•o
;o
� �} •Z
�
� �#� 3 0 �
� o -
z �
� F .
X �
W .
t .
G
ti • •
� �
I Oaba0�0� ` 'TIbA
� � � ��I l3QOW3a 3Sf10H �t/3d N3alOJ ��"`�s "�° a
.,..�..,.�a.�
I tnte -.�.�.a I
�
I
i
�
e
� ��
I4
� �S
i �
A . � t
1 � �!
� #, �A
� #� �3
, }
I 3� � -
� ��
i ~ �
;�
��
a �
�A � ��
}p� �� � <
p J
1 a
�
-�,� Q
3= o
# "
,c
z
0
�/ • 1t� � ^ �FF� �W •
�� x
� ,tn .
. ti � � o =
� � z .
'►_ :
� 3� i �� .
ix -
i� �j �W
�1 •
T4
i+
�g �t
�
tF
4}
k �] '
c.
1 Sy` -� a
2
O.
�O
.J
LL
�
- � �
S .
H �
t � p >
T� �� 2 �
} # F- '
M •
X �
W �
. • F
. _,
I0a11d0'10� ' lltlA �
') �•-..�a-� I l3QOW3li 3Sf10H �b3d N3Q'IOJ Feneis +o Q
j016 �wpr I
I
i
a
I i,
I /
i
� 4
. � T�
� i
I %A�� �
' �
/ '
� r �
.. �' �
� �\ '
i `� � ,_ �
I � �
I / � � � ,
: �
�\\ t \v i�
. `� �
.
. , �
Y /
%
% Z '
`�, !J
I '6
I�
I ,O
O
I O ;LL
� �� .
I � - 'LL ;
; o � '� � — a ,
� \\ �\� \ . z �
\ '\) F -
m •
� �W .
\ O '
I \ � o o°�
I `
1 ��
� � ,
�
.
i
�
Z
_ -- - _ - --_- li--- <
l �'
�_--_---=- _ �� =
� � ,
;o _ .
? ,
.�
��
;X
'_ •W .
_' q O�o _-' . .
. •
�
I
. .�.��_:.
� Oa11a0'� _ ' '�IbA
I I �..*�,��I 13Q011I�li 3Sf10H �d3:� t,�Q10� �����s ..� a
Fo�e •...�.�r I
I ys
��'�
I !L- R i^ a —� _
� ''O`"�n° �
�_ � �' II °� i �
� o� E��E�. i� �E� �'.�
;
� E= E�E� i, ��
: o,;�o,:� � -I m
�� �I I�
� �,
0
` ��� i� o= 1j;
�c �o �i E� �iW
_�
_ �� o I; _ �� �
— _ --� = 0 3 �
� , o_. .:
o� �
- �tl
, �C� I �� .
�'
� � 6 I! '
CE i� - .�
- i; � �
o: __�_��
x I
� m
��r '� ` _ -
0
E : I r= __s
1 C� �� > .= I
� .
C�i� I�W o`��� 0 ii '
o Ct� ii
0 � I�r4 � O 0 � ��
� � ----ll t�n 0 � �
�` � ` I
� �I
o::.. F�p p � ;
�,�1.O O_ ii
� �; �
� ,�
.; �- o_. ._.,, _ I�
� �1� �':: �� o!=� � =.C7 Ci �I
C� C� ,. I�
c �� 6�:�0 0 ��
4., I X
a � '� o ��� 0 � �I d
�; o o,�.,0 � ��
O �
O O II� p 0� �.�i�� I> I
io
, O O O II �, O— ��C� IW
, �II C I
i � �I� ��� ��r�.��� �O(
� O I ar __I Z �
; 0 ��N o i
O �, _�W � .
� � o o= o= .
. '`V :: . �,.. �
.,
I .i� • :; - f= : * oavaoio�. ��ivn
:..�.�....,��.:;I. ; �
'1340W3!! 3S(lOH �113� N3Q�OJ� _,.�...,,� d I
II I � � �. . • .
� . ' � • •
i .
,
. : • .
. . . , . .
� ' .` • .' . ,
�
,i � .
�i 1 . �
S ��; • 7 .,. ' . . • �� .
.'� II � � .�'
�'77 i�' � �: ' • � ' ..
y� . � � 'I ' r . � im�
'� �1� ,
;; ,� . �,, .
�4� � �� � . . � �� - .
aF ; � � � :.,�.�.�
. �,F .; ', � �t: �, ;��;
� � � �
;� �-�.`� �i �iK i' ��+ • • '
�: ,�, y . ,_� ` /� .p:
,,� ��' ,;F ,. ,
,,� . ,� �� : �£ �f,, , .
�"�_ II •,I ,�' ' ��I '
�' � �� :�'I
t�� � �� : , ;
i .�ft i �� i .
, �
i
� 1�� . � i �_' '
���� , � ,, �
, �r
�
, �;
. � , I �
��;
� � -- . ;
' �_ �
���i�
;
•1
. r • ]
�.. �oanao�o� �idn - �
- so .r.e.n . Es�sz�s ..o tl`� q
'�'°° �'°"'�°" l3aOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3alOJ ,zo�e -•-•�� • :;
��w.«,Na�n.�eo-as ia� I
f
. ,
� •
Z
� I�.
,d
. �
� o ,
�LL `
•,\ O ,
2
'O �
, 'oC -
`� ;p, i
.`
, \
0
/,_, /> a '
.
. ;
�\%� ` -
: �
'► ,, o
� o �
.- .! �:
�
o �
\ `sl
�
� A
�
e '
:� •
r
a
a
0
--n--
N.
��
. �
�r��s�����s��������� .
:�
�r
' • I 1� •
i
. ' V ./•/• . ^ .
, I
J
_. ..�.. � oavarr�o�� � iivn f�„z,e .� �' :
�.._ .�.�.��. � a�
,o,�..�a.� 1340W3li 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ zo�e -��
�
:
z
�
J
a
�
0
�� �_o
� � �\ o :
n �
��:. �, -
�� ���: .�
.,
, , :
,� �,.
.,
,.
.
'. ; ,,,
00 \
N
E « \
O
N tl
/ � N �
V
h � C' �
O �
N , .
n � � �'\
O n /^�p i
O, r J f �.�
� d
N Y �
��\�'�\ / � � .
� �
( �
.i� � _4..��
a
� `i o• � 1:
� ' ►J -
r = � I �
� � � � ��
• I
c` � • I '
� M
��i���` �� �� � 'r$ .
\ ,� �� � •
r r �'
___ _ _ . �� ,
�. •p 'l�r
• s IJ
� �' �_
� Y, m y,' •
i �� •
' �1I
\\ � �•
C�
I Q� r.p \
\ _ __ C• '
� -r_
� �
\ �� / / _ i
V
�
,
�
,, � '
.. �
4 '1✓ � _ �
�
� �� oanaoio� � 1IVA E6/YZ/8 .� `� '
�� ��.��
.• .�..,��•�-«s l3aOW3li 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ �o�e -�� 4- �
.
�
r
�
2
<
�
G.
� .^ O �
/•:.� \ LL •
• .`\ � q
�� � _
��
r_ ��
o • ��
w ��
��
�� �.
.�
��
± , \` \
! a 9 �
� S �, .'�.
/, o • \ '
-.. .�'��a�
y
� �� � � ��� ;�� �
� ���� : � �° .
y I ��
\ �
s !j I
� .^ • ';«. �;�.I�
o � `��
� �
,� ` = o
/ °�! e �
� `� �;� - � � ���� ���,��i
.
a �� ,
'�.\ �:� .w�� �III� .
' 2� ��
g
I I
I„�I,ilh I � I I
C;;
; - . ��� �
C �.- .
� = ____ _-- � �
I \ �;r � -- � I
�� ���..
�. .
,�. —�
r... ...i
oadao�.o� � �idn 'b
..,. ....�,., � Fencio +� .-
°'°° � "°"°"" 'I3aOW3a 3Sf10H �Id3d N3alOJ ,zo�e -��
.A..�,,..,,��.� :4C; ..
. .
. .
z
•� .
� 'J
4-
. . �
• , ' Q �
:� � O
LLi �
� f�,,. 1
� `��\��'�...\ �. \
� ti �
�� �? �� � . �
� �� ��� .
r
�`�i\
• ..�. .
� �\
�i ..
i '���
i .\
O
Y. � .��: ` .�
\� �� ��
- � � �, �s.�:��, • � �-`1� . '
�� ���, � �:_ .,.
. ��:.�. ,
. � �� � .
. s � .
�;� � :�.
',s . ,�, .
. ' � I
,i
. i . . � -
i
• ' . �
. . , `. i
. . i � �. .
. .�- . � � � t . . ,�
. ' F, II
• I .��, �Ij . . ..
,�,
. ' o,�!li , ;
•.�� .�=�c--� :
. . . ,.� .�;i-./ .
� _ .
� � , �
Odd!101O� ` llt/A ;!" �
� +�� EB/Yt/8 +� *'� ,
'm'°� '"°""°�°'� l3QOW3li 3SfiOH �b3d N3alOJ �� �
w�wn.�p+�s FO l6 •a"w a°r -
O
� ,
Y
2
< ;
J
d
� '0 O
J �
' � �'� '. . N- 1,
i
// � \ � �
. �
. ' %% � ' �
::.% `'• ,
�. � ,
�
„.�. .
—?`��. .
� � �\�a'\ ,
�a ,,\
�"' � ,• ;` .
.' �, d ,�\ .
� \
� , o p �: �a.�
; \ '�\,�
� � �
. � o � ,_��. � �
\ ��\ � ,
��.\ \\
:` �, �
' i
\ /
. � I
�
, i
� '
l i
, i
r . .
I
� I
I
.I �
� ' I
„/ I
1
------, r , :
`� � .�..-1 �
� ',� 'y.i../. . -
oanao� � �ivn -
esnxie � r
�'°� '"°"°�� 1340W3a 3Sf10H �d3d N34lOJ ��s .w..�� 'a
,�..,,�,r�•�
w
� o
0
Z �0
� � . J =
/� � '
I � �
` �� '�t �
�/i' � �
� , �
/ �
♦`;;�v � ^\
, �
��. ��
��j ��r �\
/��'
� �%' � �\
� y \
� � , , �
i. � � �
\ S
.� \ 9{ .,.� _ \��.\.�\
� ,`
� • �`5� '�4 1':..t\ .
s ,
•� �t�, i
�> � I
--�� � . i' �'\�
� i
\� \ ��/� � �v
+` � \ �--i
_ \ � i
i
i
� � .
� .��
T� ,t���i � .
� �_r •
T �ii� �
�i I .
J�J i�i
Y� ��
i �e ,_
�
�
; i
�
. .----�� � -
1— ----� �..___l
� � .
���..���
• � . • �
�
� � • � • , .
,���-- .., xil �,�� ���I
i ll�� ■T�i �u �� ���,�
,� ���� ./� _, ����
�i� - � ■
�:I��� �u^ �-` �:,/ � �
(;� �_I�_ i� �:t
-I--..., • - I:s
.� _ � .�`.J
-�- ��- E. .;
'�1 -�_; • ��f
�:, „� _�� . �
� -- I . �°_ ii ;
a = �a �
. :
�.S ,�N � em,.
� I�
� � �'��'==�%iii�ill
I� ��__�'
' �� � �' �� ��I=1�I�
t � �
�������_ � _
:I,��I�=II =�I '.^,
.��f'����1 ,
��a=� C=j =11 ��I �1
�,�,,�-� I��I� I �
(��-I�^I .��
:C�=i � -� ,
�� I ��I �^I � �
� ���. � - = U.J �� �
',;i' -- i „
i�� -._. .-. � 1��_` �ii'�i!r.si
,���� �.�; ��� _��;I� � � � =JII..� ��
�__ ,_�,�_
I11�.=� �I��I r=1 � •!! " ( ■, Ii■1
! �■.�� ��' �� � e ;' ■� ��;'��1 r��
'I�.^i -- - �iN ��
li�l �i=� li^I i �i ■�� w���,
� 1�.�I �L�i) ��I � .■ ' -
.� _���; �� , �.il� ..I�;�C
�q,ji��,��'�t^! �-° • � " Lw :'.:I�� ■II' '
���.MIl��G�•.I����� f�! �a �� ��; ::�!hl �J,
^I ��I� p ��� - , �
i��=��•_'- ���I : . ���� -.�,� �!
�� _ • '319;"+' ::;� :
_� '��v�: I a j 'i�'�:::I: �;�li�� ,
:�—
�I�I :!:_ _- i,� - �'' ��� �_ �� �� -
�� _.,.._._ _
°� ��_ 'a=��ll� ��� � °"���� -=; �:�-�..��
-� �-� �^� ■��
�l I - � � � ��.� ���� � _ �
I■ ?III� F�,� il!��� �:� -�r _�
�.��.I ��� �= ��Il. � �� �_ �■=�00�
'� - �■:��'_��� =� !' -= .=il '!=\ i�li
�� __ _ �,� .� �r �:���� _ ��
��y� �� ����,, �,���� �_�������,��=��
��� ..__
����� �:��� � �.-� ,.... �.�;��, �,�
, � : ..
;. T - � ��il����� i.i�i� �.� :����
:�� :�� �� � '::� ,'�i�:=/�r�
��_� �i ��� I��� � _ _ _����,
_� �� me •. i- �.—-,�d,—
� ;�_� ��� ir —
���'IL:���::
� _ _ --�— --
OadaOlO� ` IIVA �i
a. .�...�,., csirzis � '*" _
r�ss .ro�.o.•or
.p,�,..,,��.�.«5 l3QOW3ti 3Sf10H �d3d N34lOJ �o�s �� RI
� Lr �
�i � ii� t
i3 �F •3 S1
� � �---� -
_ , - -
�- � i -
� --- -- --- �
j E
I F •
I � � � � �
� I p � W �
i _
j • � � � N o W �'
. r� I $ a � • \ " • d> •
p � • N � \ � � t � �
� '� E e e O - �\ i O i
f .^ t t ' '��°c �� _ .
� I � - ¢ � � _ - �
. • ��o.l � S �°e y W
x �Y. f e ` d
ry � I Z n �
� o � . •�► , _ .
� I U ; f o N : � .
4 0 � --- W � a , z
< =
'-- - d � � � ' �
� �� p
�- <. �i� ,vWf
�.
� r ---- --- --- ---- --- �
� 1 •
ti� i �
iC �} I �
- . - ' ' "i
4 , ;
�3 �r �
:� � i
E� t3
;
. a
� � �
I � � � '
�� T# ' :
� ��.s; �
—�--;. _— _ -�- �—�-�--. - -
� -- ----_— __ , .�.
� � m �
� . � E a
' �
a •
I '�� 9 � } o �_ `� �� �
�L: -� m �\ I i y o ,O �
', .+ O � �\ o o : n.
s �+•
�.e' ' \ . � �� iA N 0� I� 1
' • I �' �' •. �' . I• '�' C . .(L!
•� .� �' _ • ,e ' 6
I -� 9� f' �n '�
-. Y .^, �
�' a ; �i 0 �$'
1 � T , - •' _ .
Y � ' �Y '"' / N o r `
�� y � y r A � r�. G
� {{� � • : �
I / y
e � � _ . % � f � '�' U
-i ,a, I / i a't 7 W .
� ' � .�! � W ,
—� I . ., d
.� �
�� 33 � . . .
� ,;� .
. �
� �
• �, �� oaeao�o� �idn ��� .
��u� ..a..owr
f8/►E/6 � r'.
- �•��-� �300W3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ �o�. -�� a�
q
�
}
J
�
, Z
�
W
C
<
S
dl
� 't
Z
� ���: �
o . ,
: = o
�� � _
,
\ '
� -
,�
, :
. ,
�
� .
� . , .
,,
S •
\ \`\ . � \�•� • . ':
� ! � �
!- '.f�
\\� l'"{ 3 i� \ ..�
����� �\. � � Z � 'S�
�' ' <� \ � e
�` � .� ��.� ` . .� \ / , �
� \ . :
\`\ ;� �`�\1� . I k�
�\ � �\ 1 'r.
i �\ �- ��" � \ • �
.Z� � � •� \;�.., • � �
~3 ` \ e�� \.�� � ,�' I ' .
2� �� �i� � �\�S, �i� `t � Q 3 � U
�I ` �T �� �-., • �- .a
�� `�i ��_-- ��a�6 �`�� ��i��ciY� �l p� I � 4- , i
—Z—��� *"'�—'T�� \ � I ,�.T
�y� .1 , � ` � 1 I r�
� �;, , , � , �3 � � '�
$�a; �.� . � ,U � n � ,
��i � ' ♦ -1 3 �
� Ty'�
� /` u� � , ��
' . � _� 2 _�,. ...�
ir � ' �
i / .�9
� �
C �t
� � . ,
� ' � i � � � , �
l�4��'~� � ~ � ` '�
.t?�lb � �"� �-��_- --�- L� --- -� •�
.,� "�
/ __- 1 0 :
�
\ �
a - - ���,�
/ � .
� . �
3 - f,�
_ i -___...
. , .
�fl • a6
�.g f
, � �
�
,�.
/
. �
.
� � OGVdOlO� ' 'i1V11 , � � .
�.,� ..—o,.� � , esivzis ..o r
"""' "'°"°`°'" � � 1300W3d 3Sf10H �d3d N3G'100 ' �� -•�� a : "
,�,..,,�.��
, ..
. �° ,
�� � i ,,
� � � i ' - i
— 1--� �-- ---� _1
� - I � r � - � �
, = i
- � - -- , �
�- 1 ' I ,
- ' , o � ! I _
, ` '
—, - ; :
r• • � _ : r - I •
i _— \ r _ ' — �
� {�_ _— Y L��7 - _ _ � IS
�' � _ � ...i i t
��_- _ � I — � � -
— �
. , — � � � �
t I
__ • �
� �T��
-� r-1 �--- ---1 .
� � I 1 i
/ � i �
Y �� � � ,
l
� � � .
� i`� -
. z� ,.i � � .
_T�\y `
� � r �
--------- -� t a
� - -- - __� � �
- �- �� - , `
-- I �!�r � � �
li � 7
.z � �� /���,_ � f ---t ' .,;,
- � - i_ 1 , r r " _ t _—� .
� r a 'f �i� �-� �
I . �� � ,l i I �
— . I � �I: . � �. I 1'. .
�. � I�1 ��� �i • I � ..
_ � I• •;� � I lii � ii3�� � ' O �
j� i 1 ' . � I '.
; ' � � i � ' :` '� �� t ,.�
' , -' .,i �� I 3 I �, �h
�Y , =} � ' ��� � � �? �' � -_ "��
'ei � e� I � _ r I
�, i
��
_ �'�+� ,
�,
� - - I ! � ,; ' " � ��" ...
� � I -- 1 t�;
/ � I - � I i
, ,
� ,` ;� -
,. � ; ; .
�� � -Y L_ - i , _ � I .
, _- � , � .
�I _ — I --i ,
i I ! � �"
, . _ � - � �r ,
' \ � I , ---� '��.�
1, f_ � — t ' --1 ��,l�.�.�'
� � • , �':
- -�---� i �� i ,
. � , 'ti
•L' • , _• �• �. ' ► `I �� r •5'�r �; ��ti} . \.V `��,►�• k
h • �� • . ,..w ^t � . •h � - � � �:� . .�5�.� '� t�\�
� �`• �� .. :• 1 � r. � • � . , � � ��� ' i� ��. •�� �� .
, , . .) ► . •�. .': •�� .` �, .
, •�,'� '1�,:` •��;{;� � '�, ., � ''S � .. ', «�.� ,�'y f"� .�, a x4
� f�:. - . '^�'� } . .� '� ' �r �� s r,.
�` � � •� �' .�`': i • � := s'' � . , ;� . �=,k . i '�� .`�
� t=�. ' � ;: , �• ,•-.�' r �, ': .. ' ' ti •�p• .`:
� ,•�• ' � ;'' . . ` t� • :� � �` t c�' r,t1 �.. . ' . �trr��1�� • r'� '
, �. ,,� . ,i. _ .• _, '.�'+o ' ' ^ii•F ^ r;r�,» ,�� \1.���� �s��px.�s,
�� '�` ,,��i` �'v,y.� ..t: • r� ` �'` -�s • ♦ �,. •, .1 ����M '-„Zw �t
" � ��' ���`��. �, ° . 1 �'�' •a .f . •,\�!�. � /r� �.:)+C.:
��� �w . . .`t'•-'�* s'\• • '� C , .. � � •�►.iT' �t'.} tv �� �e Y'£ .
�� F1� ♦S '� �'� '� � � � . Y� . �. � 7'" �• ���� •�� L;'�•..
tv'�'h• 1.� :_ �:`,*.� y,•,.:`� '� ` • •�y � �. �� ��11PIy�� j��y
���
'�"�,�__�,��t�:.° ��r"'�;4 �s�� �'�''` ^;;• � '� ��' � ���7� y';��
���.'9��`" « � ��I �,�{ �CS.'• �'�t. � vr.i:. .. � `�'•.
1•�� �,F��',.� � 4fi�''\�i if:! i� � :� ' ", �...s. �,�6�'� � A::'e.
. '#� � � ��J t i ,w, 1�'�t ,t 'q'A��C`:.'� .:as�l� ` -:
'•'�v���Y 1���,� ! � ( ���"'!�.Tr��� .e�lr
:�'��11.a..i •,�1 _�t' , ��'�1f�Il��S <.~ '� �',t d�
� + •
14.. E I i „�►'�`/��7 ,7L��:
�.x y - �.�W.
4 :� I � �1 .. �'r�'
_�•, }- `• ,.,'I il _��� ��i
_ �� i �'�. V w�i;.�'`A .-
_ '_:� ,.: � � _ ������:_-
--` � � ,�: -�'�;:
�`� �. ,r l I � : � � •-�s.?�s g,i..•;
'+ �;. ,� .y; ��, � -�"""'S 9;;'•,��
.� �� �I1; ;�� �4. .:=-,:;; : � .
�'� �� _ •, _:',►�.� •,�, �1.�'.4,..
= \ ��� � �:�+ �
;:�� '` °� _ 1�� A�� r �_..
� '�::1 �- 'l,�pC•
� i L �;. � � ��,,r.
.,��.�"':� ? �7 ( I y, '�!�' y!S .,,�
� �y � ��{r
�"�'�:��4��\ � . ! J���S. ^ 't?�� t
Y !c -i,' �.-� •�' ��T!! ..�:f
����.�t � •�i� 1 . 1I � f '�,� �x� +.
y •j,,_ .t�. �* ��_ � ...h:_ �. ,.�..
��;s....��.."��`� � , ��, ,� ;, li=�� � � _`���;�
z:��-��:.�., y ��- � �i _ ,.. .-�1�Ii�?.,_..: ���, ''.$q��;i�;:
�:�,�w �-�'�irR�i � ���w- :�--�1�� `f.F •7M!.f`'•„t.•.
- 1'r�i�� a �� L' _ '.. i�•�� .�7
�`=:::ti. �'L% � � � r J KI _ •��N� 'qw•• , •'`•
' �`^'_ � ;.
'«��!C,��� . � � '�'�"�, �.���Tr��.[' u :.� : ,'
��":' : '�"�:� i +�2•:" �', ,-
.'�I �f . �'�J ;�T � +�1� ;e y r�y
I+ ' � � � :f1 � A y }���K,
'�`r•� ' ���� ' s � •�#.t��v4� ��•{ ,`7f7�.
E•.' ,��w ��•. � �a��;4 yfiS. ..�e��;,
� �z���'"� - --- ,�'�''�:�fi' =z rw.:;4,,,:''.,.
,...q..n.io'�"""�:,.� C_ri. `l'�'i g.•.*i �-
' I �.r�rea..s� ��i�h r' �• '�r• i .��,..�ti$l+_�
��:�C
y�„�! �;, it,��a;�'��i Yn:Z7r�a.t
�� \•T'�e�� L, l�� 'r,.,ic�°�•
•QdM. i .i �'1G u { �'� ... ' tf..
I T. � _� ���� T ���.
I � r ^i 1. �1 • . . Sx��i�t#,�1
� � � a � :�I��� MY�\�'.. a .+�'�,�x�
;•��- r _I � e �xq�..r •, i .�
1.,_ '� ��r..;: :,`X�='b.£ ��,.. '��'f ';.t=;�7�:��,�'i�� �:��jYi' � �� �i�e����t':+
_ � �P��•j•% .� .. ��� l�. Cic �
'�' � � - �' r� t j, ..i , i -1 ``�g��iY�I�J' ,�`k.+ _.
•� :� .� t�_�I'� '`: .� :s, � •S`�+.��i����' `; �Jy 'a'•.:
',ii �• �I, �� . .��:. � .�,�! �,. 3;����i.•±.
l°. � � 'i' � (�� t • � p•
�, ;� � ��:� �,,..
'I��1i !�f— �l! '��I{ ,='i� �M1: �� � �l�i� �' .�;,�R, '.�.+�:R�`jvF�"�'-
r t � �l � � 'M
.� ' ��• � : � `A ����' � t� ,�
y �'i � I '�,••• �� � .
��' � �, .�..�' R �rs ���i`i��ls� . ���, 1^'
� ���1► •�;:
i: r�b'�' �.: r,�� � ,, ,�-•,
�� � ' � :�j ', ��'.�.
' ,,,�i`i.�, ��`„ 1 i •�#i �'�' '�'b ;;�••-•
__��� d I :,;��• ?— �--.. °� _ :.v ��A � �?.��:.
�! �. � ��:-'•
,� � r� ��= �.� .�� ;?.1N'�" :;;
� '"'�I E �i- ..; ,.��� �.$:,. ���: ;;.;.
,_y ','� � o� , �._• : • .��.�......� ,�,_ ,� � e,`
t� ��. ���a �' �' � N:N�N1 � '+.
�`�'/i/�. � .� ��l r'��_AJfNI�y}i���Il��(*� �
�/�,r: °��'°�i�f .�a��'�GYtUt[it}. �N 't ��' � �{•�'
ppy�y •} LL^.qG hy f�y��� �"t�^
!, � ,�,�r ,a •� ��'�J� � � ."�:.AiY�jfz�,t�' �f w .7� � ..�i�s1.�c
��� � �'�y � � �� �:��i•'• JNnI��i � w"� ' _i
. A -�� :� .. . � -�y t �sa�. '�.�'N�=,� ;�.,� 4 .�"'� :.
� ��.� � f `r . .//i `�• ' , 'y �i ^I�� ',.� . �i •+1�, ;`` M � � 3'�-1;�"'
, �». � � ,� � � :,.� �i . � , -k ���
.,�,.,�._ �, . �� _.�..E ; r--� ,� _ ,,. . k..;
i``�'- ���-, • rJ/l1q: � � . �� _i' .':. ' ..� w._....-'��.. � k''
/ � M 1 � � :r
� '1' T , _ .�M � H �"� '�. , ''_'? � ��� ;.
��� '� .��, �� . _� '♦ j�� �>. �� `y..i,����!. '�y ��
� �. , ' M � .� hr .�� t> �~ �M��i°�r��l:-. , i,• ` �
� �� � •s�t ��. 7f` •�'i y ��i� .� tw� _� 1 .r `!y��--a �
�j ��� •.��. .. �t .��xr*����- .�J' � ►� �,"�.'�_.,, '*�����`'` �
.r..�� ��., + `.•���i� t�►'-*�'�:`,• �� — . �..
��'• �r.., T fi�a...- •�f' +J �►e „� _�`;� �:.�.�' � a
1 il���-,��� � � . •J' r;.t��:...� � ♦
.� ` ti � �i.,-. ; '�4 �;. .
.�`�;°, �, ` i �.�:=-_'a..: :�.,;'"'-•�` �I �:`;:��. i .«
�• y � «. ,_ +� .�,�\:�� _
`t � 1` `R � ► - ��r. ��. � "� ��`�S� �Y.
�. �' ,��c'��.
� �. � .+ � ��1t�w,,, `T "�"�.,_ �;;.
. , .
. . ;•��.�-• ' . ,,�'4�,�` � M`��� '� :7 ,L,��
~�,�l '' '�������� ��y .����ry;�a r• �v. �� ` ' �� ��
,;�, ......
„�.� � �.� . ` ` =� --- ' . � ,
t!�`�'s'`�yti. ��'�;��`� .�,� "�:*'•�11 r► ''.r. , '�� `- '� '- ';'.�''`.�:" �,°� �.."
,'�� ��.1 � � �� F -v����...�. =�a-: ��' '• � � : � •i
..�`.�.�.� .� 7��' .tt�..��••��..` i �� ��:� . ��•� : .+ ,�
\ .� J:. �.:� ."t.''� ' ;�.�,;. � ' �� ' •�`��r'+:�.. ' ". ,.� .;�;:• :
• � �-��+ '-.=�•�. �'4\�`�' . .,C': �•• ' a�1►;��{:�:1� . . :� '� �' i
y ���1 �',' s���s��
'i ��.;`�.;.. .".• ` ,, '.;ti.� •'�;• �5-- '4-:",•y ,4c•t'"�'"'�� '�` � ».
a �, ��� •',t . '�• �� `�'�•�• •tf t'" ` `1 �
'S�����,..,�'l{ f • '• ..,=�•~ �••:`� '�, .r'�� ; :��1'�. ��' . .�' )'' � � � �''
�� . t . .,� L •: .,-.� ., . .t .� ��` � • �( .
;\. ��,1'�r�~���;'� -�1,��:"'��s:a'��y�.��� J� .� :�i' .y'' • � i .n � �.
ti i' �"t •`C�' •I���ti�,,,'•�•�'� I.1,!`�'. :�`• � � w�(•.
�'1�'' t�•�':� t •.1 .l;��`��� '�. :��. �. .� '�1� t� �; 'y3• 7��
�►.f'��•. . '�..`. �.\`_ .:�,`. +ii��. ;:�.: �•��1M�� V •�� � • �1!�'s F�.
�:� � .L.r '�t\,r,♦ � '\''l�1�,• �' • "' }' .�. .I .r\.•.+�
� .:« .�� fr +`���, � ���� �:� ;� 4�t��'�� .Z�.� k'��, •~��`'•1.
�t�� _:�� �'�� �.�+,�'*'��s��. 2•:.�. ';;,: �' ?►�a.� � �"►l��.t
�y `�:1=, � • .:'} � ►'"";�, . ``�R.�,".',• c"��. �.J� *'.
. .ti .� "��.E .,�, �
+� •,� .r :'"fi:-., � �. i�. k .
:i�• � : ..��, �"'..�;a •,;�:`�' r� •`
i �}i ♦
' '` .d- '- s�l.i '�.� •4�ys�•�' '�� �l}�i..:�.
'� ����^� '� ��� � `' •!.a' ..w� � '� �►;�}i.�* E
..� �t'. \l .�..J_ �� I ��� ~ ='�. •s=:� �'�,. •.;.,;'''
<.. �''��� , ��� �• i���_, •f,, 1't�.r.��_..
� }���' :► �' ��-.�.:.
- < !I .� r• " ..J_::�`:,=�'.
� ,�;r �, 5 •. ,,.•.' '�•�1"1��� • �t�'\�ti ��.t:::.� 1 t. �:
i,� '1F ;f '1'• � ;„�':�• �i:w.� i��.
f ����.�'�:: .� + �,�—���,Y��%'':�".i�' f, il��
�i. ��11:+ :-. �1�• •� .� . . F � �'f:. .t'C�
;.. ..,.✓;,,��., '4'. • .. :•��F':•;��,\ :.+' `.�'. ` ��
. ."- ..� �'.,..�,_• ,•�:� �i�•. , i.�`s .�
l .� 1� ��. :.., .. � �. �� . f , '
� �\. .,• \.. _ ' + F,����'i�
',� y L ,= .�.:�'*'., �•. � ��w�► i 'i � �
�
��� �� •L ��V • �� -� •`1y1��, ' , 1 ' �i+"
�� �'= A%f, �Q ��:._ '�� ' ��`� '-
_ � .i,,' .Lt ,�c. T, , � ����
'�� � �• yr � , ;��'�.i �t
� _ �i S" , i �i��.
�• � �_. �.�� ..
: 1 • �
�1 «t�' ti • ,e.�IR
M� ,i 3.�
y �� �t � — � •i
: !� i — :!r .�i� :
' r F ' , • ��,V �KCt� f
:,.�_ ;a:�~ .• .�"`,r r'"'r' j •a��.� =?~'° ti#
' �. .. � 1 j, s � .�� ,.
^•. ;� �� 1�r'11
'� �f+ ,'' � '��•��� • '.� 1`r .
' =s.. . ,' t -'�-�1 1�• Y. Yta: n.. , t�''�t
1 �� 1� � �Z` �'�'[�
� ��. ,r �7 ; 'Z�:..?..�� M��': , 'f�� 1. .4tS:�
� _ • ,�,l� ,�; . :
� 4! .y � ;iti�� � "���.�
i � ' �� ���' ��>
- �M� � ""' l���. , ` y�+'�•^�'�:
^-���:.�r� H„M ��y ��� '..�t� ', •/!'�,`�, f
�,`. -r��i. :��I �� �?��' �►
l� 1�+� �+ �le �� ' ' • •.
';�•���{•,_-:�;.'.!, � '-1«� r`�,,. •�, �._.x �� ` 4.
` ' �•r i�':� •i� '�R ��y ���� . . � T�u •L � i.-.
��4 'r I.l. �� �.M!� �1'.+��� �. '�;:��:j:�.! � �y��'�i..
v, a:���.'±+��:w � ' •���� ��� .�'� � '����.� ! ��� (�i�C
�'ia •��. .r'i. . �•\
•. ���f , ♦ �� ' � •�,N �- � ,` 7
.�` .,�<".�1!�t` +,',• . .� + •*�.�' F� .� w�:.
'-���\r•.• ��f�1�.� '. 4 �'•r / .:-�:' � r �J yt
_�i :=y . ....4���`� 1� �w��, y�v•r .'1r��.,� .r. •�"t.lt�.
r•"`�D 1 + t I �� .�( !
r � �`'.. �' �� .r.;• �. ' ►F �•l i
�+.:�����..tj".�• t.:�ir`..:�'�.. «,��i'�.r'� ��►"'�� •r�a �� ��.��T� t ,� t�.
r :�:.. �:���w� •qt '�.►;�_�M:�.! :iir��,�,� � '� ,��;����.{ �' S
���-'� ��:�.,..� . � _ ..,.v,�,:x:,s��;•�.•�•� -�a, : �:�:��;a.;� � �:;
,� i�"%i . ; .i,.��: f�' ';.r^ `.'?:�.t•y;i..?!♦ � '� r:.`, a,';��:�''�� ,�f
.yt 'i sj .•,�,,.�t :� • � ._ .. �ti• +^��'• �.t �• + �.��+! ( ��
._ �.,� '� ,� •..t.V, ` � � � �.
.�� • .':w�; `•�`-t, �f a�..�.:�?� - —'��i•`'�s��._:.'.. ��� �� �'4� �� '11��
�"!y�• :��► 't.�+►�� •t,:• " ! .•,.�!�� � • �,� �� ���� �i �.
`�� t .i' :��..�'. :� �'Yy� '' �� .�'1'• ~�is� .� r .,. �. M • •1�1
�,'•.�•.� : .1��'•st"a �.j� 1 •,f�`►•� :.-::�'�!^;��: ; ����� t•1.,� t•�
�.: ♦'�,.. ' �j•'� '� �`S,• {�• �w.�• �1L h�'.'.L± .� � •.
.�-- . . . w��,. �•:;5.: • st.:!� ,1,���.y � —•��:. ...t'. �i1�,y�gtR•t �� �
� �G"•'� rt > r,f. r�v:,'. �% •Y, • � �!�_��,�� - f
•.�� .!: ��'. � -. �. +; '�i.��:Gr';`wc+•.. ��.
�'.;�.f` ��� .�w �'' '� ► ..,+�'.•.•;�� �i. �.- ��� �!���r� ��
��` � ��V� �•# ��`� ��'', �/ !
ti� �:k � ��.�;• ��I�. ra.. _
*� n�A:.jK.� ..4 y �.�o •��' � •�' , t..w ... •�1/:.:�iF�
���.��iJ'�,,:� i�`.����I.'�,�� '; 'J� ���.��'��1/'�• �.���`j�!` ��� ���` I
� M+• ��r�� . � •''�lI�,� f � �
�:r, '�"' •!.'N�A,,M �I'� � �1 � M � � � iS��'�,� � � 3
;��,,`.��.�._..:.,r,:� +�y�.,:� �' "� �:�������l� � i � .
�=;-+. i' f� ,y�i j.. �.y -t.'i :t '�r• y�' ••�(�'�,`•�yAs � � R �'n
' �L �• � r
. � �
. � .
CHRISTIANIA LODGE, INC. JON & MARY SHIRLEY ROBERT & DIANE LAZIER
356 E. HANSON RANCH RD. P.O. BOX 565 P.O. BOX 627
VAIL, CO 81657 MEDINA, CA 98038 VAIL, CO 81658
MARTHA HEAD HOWARD & JUDY BERKOWITZ JEROME & MARTHA LEWIS
21 BLYTHWOOD ROAD 888 7TH AVENUE 410 17TH ST., SUITE 1600
BALTIMORE, MD 21210 NEW YORK, NY 10106 DENVER, CO 80202
MAURICE O. RINEHARDT JAY A. PRECOURT RICHARD D. BASS
P.O. BOX 5397 1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 2100 1601 ELM STREET, #4224
LIGHTHOUSE PT., FL 33074 DENVER, CO 80202 DALLAS, TX 75201
G. PECK & CO. W. GRANT WILLIAMS RON & NANCY SLAUGHTER
1600 BROADWAY, #2100 #2 LADUE LANE P.O. BOX 1508
DENVER, CO 80202 ST. LOUIS, MO 63124 SAN ANGELO, TX 76902
STEPHEN & ANGELA REDDING FRANCES GUNN BARBARA OSBORNE
P.O. BOX 1274 3101 VALLEY OAK DR. % KEITH S. JENNINGS
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93117 LOVELAND, CO 80538 1531 WALNUT STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102
P & R ENTERPRISES GEORGE WASHINGTON KNOX MR. & MRS. BRIDGEWATER
288 BRIDGE STREET 291 BRIDGE STREET 8400 MARYLAND AVENUE
VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657 ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
ROBERT & MARY GALVIN N.J. & LLEWLLYN NICHOLAS RICHARD K. PARKER
ROLLING OAKS FARM, RTE. 68 59 CENTRAL PARK WEST 44 S. BIRCH STREET
BARRINGTON, IL 60010 NEW YORK, NY 10023 DENVER, CO 80222
JAMES M. TODD SAM & NANCY GARY R.K. & NANCY PARKER
R.M. & BARBARA D. EUWER 370 17TH STREET, #5300 44 S. BIRCH STREET
5737 S. GALLUP STREET DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80222
LITTLETON, CO 80120
+�aa�q�-- , �- �� � 11
.J f, • •
STUART COLTON ROBERT & DEANNE TUCKER
232 HARTSHORN DRIVE 31033 BUTTERMILK COURT
SHORTHILLS, NJ 07078 EVERGREEN, CO 80439
JRH-1 TRUST THOMAS PRITZKER MARGRETTA PARKS
4600 S. MONROE LN. 200 W. MADISON P.O. BOX 1440
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 CHICAGO, IL 60606 EAGLE, CO 81631-1440
MARION M. LLOYD MR. & MRS. RIDDER WALTER PATRICK GRAMM
25060 ST MARY'S RD. 1801 W. 27TH ST. 695 PROSPECT STREET
LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048 SUNSET ISLAND WINETKA, IL 60093
MIAMI, FL 33140
RODNEY SLIFER GORSUCH, LTD. 286 BRIDGE ST., INC.
230 BRIDGE STREET 263 E. GORE CREEK DR. 701 SOUTHEAST 6TH AVE.
VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657 DELRAY, FL 33483
RUCKSACK, INC. OSCAR TANG CHARLES ROSENQUIST
288 BRIDGE STREET 100 PARK AVENUE P.O. BOX 686
VAIL, CO 81657 NEW YORK, NY 10017 VAIL, CO 81658
RICHARD BROWN JON SHIRLEY MILL CREEK CT. CONDO ASSOC
1780 S. BELLAIRE, #106 2019 EVERGREEN POINT % SLIFER MGMT. CO.
DENVER, CO 80222 MEDINA, WA 98039 143 E. MEADOW DR., #360
VAIL, CO 81657
VILLA VAHALLA CONDO ASSOC THE HARE GROUP HILLIS AIKEN
P.O. BOX 758 3170 SHEIKS PLACE 174 GORE CREEK DR.
VAIL, CO 81658 COLO SPGS, CO 80904 VAIL, CO 81657
PEPI GRAMSHAMMER CREEKSIDE CONDO ASSOC BELLTOWER PARTNERS, LTD.
231 E. GORE DRIVE % VAIL MGMT CO. P.O. BOX 68
VAIL, CO 81657 201 GORE CREEK DR. VAIL, CO 81658
VAIL, CO 81657
GORE CREEK PLAZA BLDG. BLANCHE HILL LODGE AT VAIL
% VAIL MGMT. CO. 311 BRIDGE STREET 174 GORE CREEK DR.
201 GORE CREEK DR. VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
VAIL, CO 81657
-, �. • •
BOB AND DIANE LAZIER MARGRETTA PARKS 1 VAIL PLACE/BLANCHE HILL
386 HANSON RANCH RD. P.O. BOX 37312 311 BRIDGE STREET
VAIL, CO 81657 DENVER, CO 80237 VAtL, CO
HONG KONG CAFE BLDG. BRIDGE ST. BLDG. COND. ASS. PLAZA LODGE ASSOC.
1183 CABIN CIRCLE DR. % BRANDESS CADMUS P.O. BOX 68
VAIL, CO 81657 281 BRIDGE STREET VAIL, CO 81658
VAIL, CO 81657
HILL BLDG. VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. USFS
MS. CORTLANDT HILL ATTN: JOE MACY P.O. BOX 190
311 BRIDGE STREET P.O. BOX 7 MINTURN, CO 81645
VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
.. . . ir � �
F
� THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBUC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on October 11, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
1. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road East/an unplatted parcel located between Vail Village 7th Filing
and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the I-70 right-of-way.
Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
2. A request for a height variance to allow for dormers to be constructed at the Mountain
Haus located at 262 East Meadow Drive/part of Tract B, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association
Planner: Shelly Mello
3. A request for a fence height variance to allow for a fence to be constructed around a
swimming pool at the May Residence located at 1119 Ptarmigan Road/Lot 6, and the
east 1/2 of Lot 5, Vail Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Paula May
Planner: Shelly Mello
4. A request for an amendment to SDD #4, Area D, to allow an expansion to the Glen
Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road West/Lot 45, Block K, Glen
Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet Federal Savings and
Loan
Planner: Shelly Mello
5. A request for a major exterior alteration in CCI, for an addition to the Cyranos Building,
located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Margretta B. Parks
Planners: Mike Mollica
6. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of an SDD to allow the
redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a request for a conditional use permit to
allow the construction of three Type IV empfoyee housing units, located at 362 Vail
Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A part of Tract "B" and a part of Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, State of
Colorado, more particularly described as follows:
� � �}� ♦,
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Vail Village, First Filing;thence North 79°46'00"West along the
Southerly line of U.S. Highway No. 6 a distance of 367.06 feet to the Northeast corner of said Tract "B';
thence South 10°14'00" West along the Easterly line of said Tract "B"; a distance of 198.31 feet to the
Southeasterly corner of said Tract"B";thence North 79°46'00"West along the Southerly line of said Tract
"B" a distance of 100.00 feet to the true point of beginning thence North 09°10'07" West a distance of 41.67
feet;thence South 88°27'11"West a distance of 75.21 feet;thence South 27°13'37" East a distance of
77.37 feet;thence North 57°24'00" East a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less to the true point of beginning.
Applicant: David Smith
Planner: Jim Curnutte
7. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver
Dam Circle.
Applicant: Leo Payne
Planner: Jim Curnutte
8. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot
18, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing/325 Forest Road.
Applicant: Timothy Drisko
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
9. A request for approval of the Cemetery Master Plan and Report, for the Town of Vail
Cemetery to be constructed in the upper bench of Donovan Park.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
10. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior
alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View
Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C,
Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
�
4
� Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
�ARTNERS, LTD. �
278 Hanson Ranch Road One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606
Vail, Colorado 81657 Dallas, Texas 75219-4471
303 476-5667• FAX 303-476-0470 214 523-3706• FAX 214 523-3929
�.. p._,i . . .,ri�
�'/��m, �
C , ,�\,�
��� ��
September 14, 1993
TO: Golden Peak House Owners
FROM: Clark S. Willineham
Our work session with the Planning Commission on September 13m was a dramatic
turnaround from three weeks ago. The changes we made to the west end of the Building were
enthusiastically accepted. The issues of height, size and encroachment into the view comdor
seem to be solved.
The remaining issues are our financial commitment to landscaping, drainage, Seibert
Circle, the skier access way to the west of our building, and employee housing. I have each of
these items in my budget but the Planning Commission requests greatly exceed my budget.
There are also continuing questions over the type of temporary awning or roof to be usetl on Los
Amigos' patio.
These unresolved items will cause an additional two week delay. The revised, revised
schedule (which is subject to further revision) is as follows:
September 2'lm 2:OOpm Planning Commission Update
October llm 2:OOpm Planning Commission Vote
October 12m 1:OOpm Town Council Work Session
October 19'� 7:30pm Town Council First Vote
November 2°� 7:30pm Town Council Second Vote
I'm now confident a redevelopment project can be approved. Hopefully it will also be
economically feasible. Your continued support remains vital.
� �. W
o �
� . ��� E �'�� �
Greg Amsden suggested that the pedestrian path easement be applied to the upper
portion of the path.
Jim Morter requested that this item be tabled.
Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve this request per the staff inemo with the PEC's
corrections to the conditions of approval excluding the issue of the pedestrian
easement which will be tabled until September 27, 1993. Greg Amsden seconded the
motion and a 7-0 vote approved this reguest with the exception of the pedestrian path
easement issue which was tabled to September 27, 1993.
3. A request for a worksession for the establishment of a Special Development District,
a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment
into View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A,
B, C, Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Kathy Langenwalter stated that this worksession would focus on the changes that have
been made to the proposal since the last worksession.
Mike Mollica made a brief presentation and stated that Craig Snowdon, the architect
for this project, would give an overview to the PEC of what changes have been made
to this proposal since the last PEC worksession of August 23, 1993.
Craig Snowdon reviewed the modifications that the applicants have made since the
last PEC worksession. These modifications pertained to the fourth floor roof (western
portion of building), the fourth floor GRFA, the architectural detailing of the third floor
and the fifth floor central area.
Bill Anderson stated that he wanted to understand that when you get to Seibert Circle
that you will be able to see more of the Vista Bahn chairlift than you can currently see.
Craig Snowdon stated that this was correct. He stated that the west end of the Golden
Peak House roof would be pulled back and that more of the mountain would be visible.
Diana Donovan, Greg Amsden, Jeff Bowen, Allison Lassoe and Dalton Williams stated
that they had no questions for the applicant.
Kathy Langenwalter inquired why the applicant was creating a vertical back wall on the
fourth floor instead of sloping it down.
Dalton Williams stated that he felt a flat wall at this location might look better.
Planning and Ervironmental Commission
September 13, 1993 8
. .. _
• �
Bill Anderson stated that he feit that the appiicant's had done a good job addressing
the PEC members' concerns with the west end of the bui!ding. He stated that he was
now prepared to support this project in this current configuration and that he was not
that concerned with the GRFA in the "overhang and deck" easement.
Diana Donovan stated that it could be argued that buildings that encroach into the view
corridor do not have to negatively impact the view corridor. She stated that the only
potential problem that she had with this project is putting GRFA in the easement. She
stated that she would like to see Vail Associates deed a portion of Tract E to the Town
of Vail.
Greg Amsden stated that he is impressed with what the applicant has done with the
shed roof on the west end of the building.
Jeff Bowen stated that the last time this item was in front of the PEC he was
completely opposed to this project. He stated that he is "flabbergasted" by the
changes that the applicant has made and is now in favor of this project.
Allison Lassoe stated that she would like to see the fifth floor changed and that she
would like to see the elevator shaft modified.
Craig Snowdon stated that he is hopeful that the Design Review Board can help them
improve the appearance of the elevator shaft.
Dalton Williams stated that he is truly amazed that the applicants have been able to
modify this proposal as much as they have. He said that he is impressed that the
applicants have been able to open up the view in the center of the building and
actually increase the view of the mountain.
Jeff Bowen stated that he would like to see the backside modified so that the roof is
softened.
Dalton Williams stated that on the front elevation, on the west side, that he would like
to see something done so that the wall does not appear so flat.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she also is impressed and that the applicant has
reached the point with this project where they have a case to support the view corridor
encroachment. She said that she would like to see Unit No. 404 pulled back so that
there is some relief on the south elevation of the building.
Craig Snowdon inquired how set do certain architectural details have to be between
the PEC and DRB levels of review.
Kristan Pritz stated that the Town needed to be sure of the direction that the project
was taking. It did not have to be specific enough as to know what doorknobs would be
used, but it needed to be fairly specific on materials and detailing particufarly at the
pedestrian level.
Planning and Environmental Commission
September 13, 1993 9
.� .
• •
Jeff Bowen stated that as the PEC's DRB representative, that the DRB did like to see
all the specific details of a project.
George Knox stated that the public feedback he has received for this project has
generally been favorable. He presented his informal survey to the PEC.
Jim Lamont stated that he appreciated the work that the applicants had put into the
project. He stated that he was impressed with the artisYs rendition of the finished
project. He stated that he was not in favor of setting a precedent with this project. Jim
stated that if there are trade-offs with this project, he would like to see new numbers of
employee housing units or new open space created.
Gary Valentine, an owner in the Golden Peak House, stated that he was astounded
that the PEC finally was at a stage where they could consider approving this project
and said that it was a tribute to the system actually working.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the next discussion would focus on the issues listed on
Pages 2 and 3 of the staff memo.
Mike Mollica reviewed Pages 2 and 3 of the staff inemo which staff has identified as
issued or concerns. He explained how the staff has determined the incremental
increase of the number of employees that will be added as a result of this project.
Dalton Williams stated that he would like to review each item which is an issue or a
concern for separate consideration.
Craig Snowdon stated that they felt that the staff's employee numbers seem to be high
with this project. He stated that they are actually decreasing the density of this project
and that they feel that it may not be fair to throw the whole employee housing
requirement at the applicants.
Craig Snowdon stated that the proposed commercial spaces may add up to 2,000
square feet but that they would not require additional personnel.
George Knox stated that he thinks a lot of the confusion may arise from the shift in
where the square footage is located.
Mike Mollica stated that there is a net increase of 4,500 square feet of commercial
area as a result of this request.
Dalton Williams stated that when he reads the ski magazines that rate Vail, he sees
that Vail consistently comes up lacking in the area of customer service. Due to this,
he feels that he has to insure that two, two-bedroom employee housing be provided.
Allison Lassoe stated that she agrees with Dalton's comments. She stated that the
requirement is a minimum and she feels that it needs to be provided.
Planning and Environmental Commission -
September 13, 1993 10
w + , � �
Jeff Bowen stated that it is his experience that people generally like their own
bedroom. He stated that he agrees with Dalton's comments. He added that to buy a
unit that already is employee housing does not add any additional housing to the
valley.
Greg Amsden stated that he agrees that additional employee housing is needed and
that the employee housing needs to be restricted to eliminate the possibility of people
coming in and purchasing the unit as a second residence.
Bill Anderson stated that he does not have a strong opinion on the second two-
bedroom unit.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that in looking over the SDD criteria, she feels that
employee housing is one area that offers a very visible benefit to the community.
Craig Snowdon inquired whether the applicants can increase the density of this project
if they increase the employee housing units.
Kathy Langenwalter advised the applicants against this.
Mike Mollica then reviewed the proposed streetscape improvements of Seibert Circle
that this project contained with the PEC members.
Craig Snowdon stated that the applicants would be willing to add trees. He stated that
a change in materials from asphalt to pavers would be a mistake.
Mike Mollica stated the staff feels that additional streetscape improvements are
needed. He stated that there is quite a bit of drainage work that is needed in this
location that need to be looked at and addressed.
Craig Snowdon stated that he feels that they are addressing the drainage concerns on
this property. He stated that the actual drainage problems are not located on their
property.
Mike Mollica stated that staff has suggested a permanent planter along the west
elevation of the building in order to break up the line of the building and improve the
appearance of the skier access.
Jack Curtin stated that he did not want to see pavers along the west side of the
building because this would create major ice problems for the Hill Building. He stated
that he did not feel that more trees should be located on the west side of the building
either. He added that until Vail Associates moves the snow dump site on the south
side of the building, trees would not be able to survive. With regard to Seibert Circle,
he feels that it is not the responsibility of the Golden Peak House to renovate any part
of this street. He feels that this is the Town's responsibility and that Seibert Circle has
never been maintained.
Planning and Environmental Commission
September 13, 1993 ��
. , . �
Jim Lamont stated that he would like to see the south side of the building improved.
He said that there needs to be some form of a sidewalk or pathway in this area in
order to maintain the south elevation of the Golden Peak House. He stated that
another skier access (near Cyrano's) could be created to take the pressure off of the
western elevation. Concerning Seibert Circle, he agrees with Jack Curtin's comments.
He stated that possibly all property owners surrounding Seibert Circle, along with the
Town, could contribute to streetscape improvements for Seibert Circle.
Diana Donovan stated that pavers up to the mountain would probably not work at this
point as long as Vail Associates snow removal operation is located in its current
location. Concerning Seibert Circle, she feels that it will take all property owners and
the Town working together to address the streetscape improvements. She said that
planters around the building in some form are essential.
Craig Snowdon stated that additional landscaping is a possibility.
Diana Donovan suggested that pavers could possibly come out from the doorways in a
fan-shape.
Kristan Pritz stated that she felt that a fair solution for seeing streetscape
improvements on Seibert Circle completed, may be to have each property owner
adjacent to Seibert Circle pay a portion of the total bill to improve the Seibert Circle
area along with town participation.
Jeff Bowen stated that Seibert Circle was an important area within the Town and that
he would like to see its appearance improved. He stated that landscaping is a DRB
issue and that the PEC should make a recommendation that they look at the
landscaping closely.
Allison Lassoe stated that she did not think any permanent plantings on the west side
of the building were necessary but that it would be nice to see some planters
containing flowers during the summer.
Dalton Williams does not feel that any large trees should be placed atong the west
elevation because this will diminish the view of the mountain. He feels that a better
solution would be to place planter boxes along the western elevation. He stated that
he disagrees with the comments concerning Seibert Circle streetscape improvements
and pavers.
Jim Lamont stated that the current access situation is a liability for Vail Associates.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she was in favor of pavers along the front of the
building. She said that she would like to see some sort of landscaping along the
western elevation.
Ptanning and Environmental Commission
September 13, 1993 �2
..� .
• �
Kathy Langenwalter inquired how many members of the PEC were in favor of a planter
along the western elevation. Kathy, Diana and Greg were in favor of a planter along
the western elevation.
Mike Mollica stated that the architectural detailing along the western elevation was a
concern. He stated that this could be addressed by additional landscaping and/or •
windows, and that it just depended on what the applicant decided to do with the
western elevation.
George Knox stated that commercial visibility was desirable. He stated that a display
window would be nice.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that there needs to be some provision that if the Cyrano's
building on the east side changes somehow that the Golden Peak House will somehow
modify their elevation to match the Cyrano's modification.
Jim Lamont inquired how much of the GRFA overhangs onto the newly acquired piece
of property.
Mike Mollica stated that approximately 400 square feet of GRFA would overhang.
Dalton Williams stated that although he felt that the proposed additional GRFA for this
project was excessive, he stated that the applicants have reduced the mass and bulk
of this proposal to a point that he was comfortable with it.
Diana Donovan stated that she was comfortable with the GRFA as long as Vail
Associates dedicated some open space to the Town of Vail.
Bill Anderson stated that he agreed with Diana's comment.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she agreed with Diana's comment. She stated that
she is still not 100% comfortable with the mass and bulk of the building. She stated
that since this is the test case, she is looking very closely at the community benefits.
Jim Lamont stated that he feels that this project is at a point where it needs to go
before Town Council. He stated that he feels that this project will greatly effect the
SDD process. He stated that he feels it is necessary to find a way to redevelop and
stay within the zoning standards. He said that he feels that approval of this project as
an SDD is dangerous to the whole SDD process.
Greg Amsden stated that it is his feeling that each site is unique and should be looked
at within the SDD framework.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she feels Jim's point is valid and that is why the PEC
members need to feel comfortable that this project does offer a public benefit.
Planning and Environmental Commission
September 13, 1993 13
. `
' � ' � �
Gl� /3 � 93 Go-�.- /�� t� - f�C- l�Jo�.s.��
_ � ,
- � �d� ---------- ----- �
--�—s ���_�'a��_--- --- �� ���� � —
" 3
� �
- ---- ----- "'°�- 't
�-- – - —
' � /sc..l.P
�/''�"o�t - —
"' � ' � T
� � `--
-
-- ----� � ------------- _ _ __ _-
ol���. - ----C,�c.n�.��--�_� _-.:l�.t-�rro�t,.r r�c��-
Q,� t Q,, �-
!�.r y.� N�_-�ti�e� -���_ ��� �1'�s"G./.
� � .
--- , ----,.Gv� �.Ird..�� �t d�i� __ A�_ _.
- - -- - � ,.
__--------__ ----------.-__ � �
�
.. _.�_.7-`� ` ✓
------ �1 -.�-�'`� .�—?�-=— - --
;
--- - - " ` =��---
_ �.
.
-- ----T� - -��_�� ��-r� —�--
— --���"� -------- --
---��/�_ - s �„�-�.��,
T
-- .� - �. � � _=z ' �
�C ' -
„� � _
�-.���.�► - .�.�.. �_--__
--.---
��.�,-. w'. --= � -�-�- -�-- ---
, �--
- �,�( ,,-� ,��_��._-,�'`�' �------- -----------—-------
` V!� �,.O�C` 9�e ,�aM-- �-r� .� ?'4 �' --
/ `
.. _ _
.�,��,�., �,.�. � �, ,�.�, _
� I!I
�- � � �
1� �.— ! T� � 0. � � xs�e �
��
s.
i;;
�� ,
� -- , -
�
r - h� � �
ll �� /1
�.
/� �' ��
� � �1. /r +t /l
,'.
�
L -- _ .
� M
S
� „ „
� �.P�� l�'� �e.��=.. .ra.. ./rr°r��� o,�� ����a�-�1�
�- ��b - ' �-��- ��.:�,1'�`�' -?1���
�
, .
�
I:,
' ,wr., ,�,�,_-.___ ..,�� �._ �
�_ __ �.....�-�.-.,.��- ��
� � ! � o
.
�
�.�,�-„ -- ��-.�- �- �-�° ,�� � � �,
--- ��_�-----�- G� �'7„�. �-
� ��,.��..J,��------------
- � ' ��'��—���___.'r f��-. ����� ���
� w� ��,=-
__ _------ ,
_���_ - - w�__-���_�_� .
� - s.�� �,� ���,e�l .,G� ���.�
--_�1. - /�����'� C��� --- ---
� �- � _ ,�,. �,�;...��
� . �� ,, .
- �. �..1� - o� ------- ---- --------- ---
A_ 1. -- '' � ��
R�,,.�,:.�-, � �c-c --Q�� -- -
J
� '
� - � - � � � � - � • - � � �
� � - '- . � - . � � � • - � � . � .
� i i . ' i i - ' •
�. ���I, ��..� If'i/ I �..�/ � l� � ��
`��i�%��'/�s'"'/> � �!
�� , i I � � ♦ �
�/����.�if��Ai7� _�� . / �a � .� �/ �
t�� . ,' r� � � . � . � � L;.� � , f.-',
� , , I � ���l�1 '.�� � - ., ,
�'�!:�?!� . - '
I �-�� _ � .-_ � . � - .
��/�� . �, � � - .
�;✓��i� � �r . �
.��� � �r►
� _M_ .•_3.t`�t7� — �'a •��_ ► - _ — � � .
i � �♦ i
1� . � _� i I
_�_ ��t \ . � � ' •• S �
i1�!� � - _ • - - _ � - Pi ,
I i/ �11�_��� �►�'� ' � ,. . ,. i � , ,.
��''��,'� � � � . ,--•�:
.�'!t�!.�. ,• � _.R!/,� , • � _i��� . �
!��►��5:- �
•;�.1!%%.. ,:►�l;►;� .� . � . ,�� � �
I��:'�.'.1:��.�1'� , � � - . . :
I/,,�.� � .� � . _- . _, i.�
�t!:�. , . �.-. �:. - .� . s '� . � � • . �.�
l�...�.'��� �
�l'�:!.A�a. ' ' � � ' ' �
,��,��I.s� ... ��� _l�. � � i � ���Y�s�.'7��11
G�. -a �_�ilt �,%`�����►!� •-- + � ` "�� •�-
�:��.�.������,����.•��r�.��:y���
I%". % . . . - � � " ° �- - r
: �!��_ �.���_� ' � � ' . ' � � . '
_-� .� . . . �
�'II�II,R � . ..'�.' t. �� � "� -
... . ,,. - .� . . .� !�1 �
ti►� 'j' - z �_ � s
•
�+�,r, �i� � ,
�� �ti,�� �
,- . .:.., ,.b, . �.
?st�S; f'
`
�.��
i .? �� �
A � �.r Y
'R. i \
.1�� .$:.' .
�••�✓� ���a y ��
.�� �+' � _����" '�{� �
.�^�k'}�?b���I�
., .-�.,' .—.D-�� .
��, ]F
�•�:,['"
. �� � l � � �� �
�� . ��' . -
� � � r -
, �_ �. , E
�.. . ��
�i.� . -„ �- ��
� ��
� -
�:-.
. � �
. - . � �* � �
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 13, 1993
SUBJECT: A request for a worksession for the establishment of a Special
Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a
zone change, and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for the
Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2
and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville,
Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
:`:w>:::;;i'::z;:>'::::'�:::`::�:`���:::::`:::`::::�:�':::�:��'::>:�:�::�::��<:':>:<:::;:<::::':;:[>:>::>::::::::< <;<::<:;::'.:::;;:<::::<::>:>;<�<:`::::':#::::>:`::>:z:::>;`:�:»:<?<<:::::::::>'::»:::>?:::`::::>'::»:;::i>::::»»::>:::::<_>':<�z:::::::�::::::>::>:::::::>:::>;::::::::::::::�:>::»::
..�.
..w:.�::•::::.,•.
I. DESIGN MODIFICATIONS MADE TO THE PROJECT SINCE THE AUGUST 23, 1993
PEC WORKSESSION
The purpose of this cover memorandum is to provide information to the PEC with regard to
changes to the proposed Golden Peak House redevelopment that have occurred since the
August 23, 1993 worksession. The applicant will have the building staked and a revised
model for staff and PEC review on Monday. Due to the extent of the changes, the staff felt
that a summary, or overview, of the changes would be most beneficial to the PEC. The
original memorandum, which includes the staff's detailed analysis of the project, is attached to
this memo for informational purposes. Please note that this original memo has not been
updated to reflect the changes outlined below. The specific modifications made to the project,
since the last PEC worksession, are listed below:
•Fourth Floor Roof - Modifications have been made to the fourth floor of the proposed
Golden Peak House. Specifically, the western portion of the structure has been pulled
back from Bridge Street approximately 16 to 18 feet. In this area, the roof ridge has
been reoriented so that it would now run east to west. The benefit of this change is
that portions of Vail Mountain, as viewed from the upper Bridge Street area, would be
more visible.
The proposed fourth floor reconfiguration would reduce the additional shading in the
Seibert Circle area. The proposed building shadow line at the winter solstice
(December 21 st) would be reduced by approximately 0-12 feet. The proposed building
shadow line at the equinox (March/September 21 st) would also be reduced. This is
indicated on Sheet A-15, Site Plan - Sun/Shade Analysis.
1
r
. � � s .,.� . .
•Fourth Floor GRFA - By pulling the fourth floor back from Bridge Street, the applicant
has proposed to shift some of this GRFA into the "overhang and deck" easement area
(Tract E) along the south side of the building. The staff has calculated that
approximately 410 square feet of GRFA would now be located in this easement area.
This is indicated on Sheet A-10, fourth floor plan.
Due to the change in the fourth floor layout, the GRFA for the project has been slightly
decreased. The fourth floor would now have a total of 5,243 square feet of GRFA,
which would be a reduction of 321 square feet of GRFA from the previous proposal.
The amount of common area on the fourth floor has also been reduced by
approximately 72 square feet. With regard to density (number of units), there would
still be four dwelling units located on the fourth floor.
•Third Floor Architectural Details - Only minor modifications have been made to the
third floor plan. On the western end of the north elevation, the applicant has proposed
some minor window modifications and has also included a "false" bay window. These
are the only changes proposed at this level.
•Fifth Floor Central Area - There are no square footage changes proposed for the
fifth floor, however, the south facing exterior deck has been reconfigured so that it no
longer projects over the central portion of the structure. This change also helps to
open up views to Vail Mountain from the upper Bridge Street area. This is indicated
on Sheet A-11, fifth floor plan.
II. SUMMARY
As listed in the previous staff inemorandum to the PEC, the following is a list the staff has
identified as issues and concerns:
1. View Corridor Encroachment (View Corridor #1)
2. Sun/Shade Analysis
3. Employee Housing
The staff thought it would be helpful to further define the employee housing
issue regarding the Golden Peak House. As we have previously indicated in
our memorandum to the PEC (dated August 23, 1993), the staff has calculated
the incremental increase of the number of employees that the proposed
redevelopment would create. This analysis was completed utilizing the
Employee Housing Report, prepared for the Town of Vail by the firm of Rosell,
Remmen and Cares as well as the Employment Generation Rates, also
prepared by Rosell, Remmen and Cares (dated June, 1991, revised December
1991). In summary, the staff estimates that the Golden Peak House
redevelopment would create a need for five to ten additional employees. This
range is due to the housing multiplier that varies from 0.15 to 0.30. The 0.15
housing multiplier is suggested to be utilized when projects are under density.
The 0.30 housing multiplier is recommended for use when projects are over on
2
� / ' • Y � �
density. The existing and proposed Golden Peak House is over on density.
Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit to be provided, it is
possible to calculate up to two employees per bedroom. For example, for a
two-bedroom unit in the size range of 450 to 900 square feet, it is possible that
this unit would be capable of accommodating up to four employees. A two-
bedroom unit, with a size less than 450 square feet, would only be considered
capable of supporting one employee per bedroom. The applicant is proposing
to provide one two-bedroom condominium unit of 906 square feet in size,
thereby accommodating up to four employees. The staff is of the opinion that
one additional two-bedroom employee housing unit should be required to
mitigate the impacts of the incremental increase in the numbers of employees
that the Golden Peak House redevelopment would create.
4. Streetscape Improvements/Landscaping
5. Architectural detailing (east, north and west elevations)
6. GRFA located in the "overhang and deck" easement area
As discussed extensively at previous PEC worksessions during late 1992 and
early 1993, the staff has expressed concerns regarding the addition of floor
area located in the "overhang and deck" easement areas. At the January 1993
PEC worksession, the applicant had modified the redevelopment plans to
remove all GRFA within the "overhang and deck" easement areas. The staff
and the PEC had expressed specific concerns regarding the south easement
area, due to the fact that this property is currently zoned Agricultural and Open
Space. The current redesign now calls for additional floor area (GRFA) to be
located within this easement area, and once again the staff is uncomfortable
with this change.
c:�p ec\m e mo s\g o Id p k.913
3
r
t
� �
� , .
�•
� : .
�
�' - = 3 � � � //
- 1 � C 1
,
\ � 1 �_ ---- �
� I ��___�� .
\\ � � �\J����j���,1 l� �
�1 �� ,_ ���
� °�� �1 \ � �
e f.
� � i � �� � ��� � �.
1 � � ��� � � ��� � �� s
� �� �a � �� o
� ' \\ r� ��� 3 '/
� ' 1 .
�/�
,--
\ � �� � ' /
1��� \�• � �\ �s ,\ . ��/ (, ��
� � 3 \ /
� - -- -- \ - (. .�r.l `
.,. ,
\u+iw►,7 r�yery\ �[ - \
�--�— �— � -- �\� -
�� r � �
r� � i _.. -l� + .
/ � �p 3s � � af + �''h ' `
� .
/ \ \ �_-� b�$ �� ��� � � � .:... ' ' � � ' ,u{{
?- ..r:. t.,
v"' i_
� �- � �� # � � ,_ __�
� �� \ .- `` � � . . •� , ����:--�: �
� � �;.
/�- t �� '3 } � ��� • ' r�'�-�� . , � '�~�:: .
!� \ -i a • �,�,,: I Z�� �� � r�;;"
� �� i� "' t� �U € '�� � \ � 1 �F���, w� yp"- }{��:,-,-�.
r \ � � � \ •`�'F- V' t �ikk�'.*:�ii;=�,
� ` � � �' � - ' � � '� �
� ��- , 6 , �, � � ;.
-�ni
—� , I > �• \��, �� "�� ��..,
�� � ` � �
�
�— � � ����I o. �'- '
I I � � � � i i
8i
�+nu� � �j�# �� � I I C _ � � �'�
M•,'�'""' � I , ��-� � .m ��� °' � ''' C s
� l I
'�'��� � � j �.� ��� �� � .
\ �
v � ' ' � ����� f ��
� � -
� � \\ �� �_
1 � .�
' \\\ \ ' ��� /.
/ � \ � . �
�\\ � �\ ( � \ t , \ ,�
, <
�` � � j� � � � , '� �
r � } o
� ,�\\ �/�\/ -.\\ \\� �jZ.� ��y
�� � \/r�� I M# L #7 . W.!
r� \'
" \ , � � ��� �r
� �� �\�� � � � �� \ �k` ` ; �
� a, \ \ x .
� '
� � � \ �� � � r
. ,
i�� � �� � � 2 � � �,
�2� � ; .�`' .- \
, �Q� � �,:� � I �'� �
8s� ' - z '�z--"� �
r �
�� � � � ' .
" o :
� i Z�
� o ��
� �� ,
L '
� �
�v
��..ro. a�oi GOLDEN PEAK HOUS� R�MODEL �"°""°"�'°"°"''"•"�
�, or. S/31/93 ��a+ ��
"� . VAIL , COLORADO_
, ►
� � . .
. ,
:
�
i
�
� m
x
: � ,��
� � �~
' s
� �, F "8� .
` � ,'i
C �
Z � N
v
�:
o,
o �--�
�.
� �
a
,
Z, � ;� -�
,.,� �
,__ �
�
�
� � •
F
n� ,.�
C
ta
� • ��pL .
. X. - c-
� � , �3`
Q
� p, �1` v A� ��
�� S
� � �
, > g� .
; o� f
i
-�
� -- - -
�
z �`.
�
II ��
' � �
i x
�i g � � �
� � r � � ��
_
� z� � s�
�
L
S� .
3�
S�
��
a �°"'"'d" 910� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �"°"'°"""°"°°'"""'"�°`
N or. 5/31/93 °'°°^°"'°"" '°'°`a'
wr.eaw.ae ��
_ VAIL ., .COLORADO_ �
. � �
,
. ,
f
I
,
' �'n
: ?�
. �
� Z >� ��
_
= Q i �
�
\ �
. _
� �
�
�
r
O
O -
�
�
D �
� z '�d ;
�� �
��
JC
� � �
I p�
dC
1
ti
a�
�
, ,,;: �� ��
x, � �Z y
i �� � c~
< Z � O .
� � k
� � � � a ,�
m g „ �--� �
Z ��� ��
v
o ��
o -
�o -'� „�
�o �
i Z � �£ �
I � e
�� � ��
� ?
ti
� ' N
�L
�1
Q "�
J�
---• i
a� N
0�
� i
�� ^ � .
;•'
+�
i
O
��
�
w �� e1� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �°°^-��-•�
�+ 5/31/93 �,o„o.,u,,, a,.w�,
va om.au ns�
VAIL , COLORADO
� � .
i
� ��A
. �� --
� X�
• �
. �.
/ Z
. ; Q,
�� � �-__--- _--- _: :-
` O
�
v:
� -�
a � -
Z -_ - --- --- -
'�l
.\
I '\
/,\
� \��.�
o Qo o \ �
Q \
� m, -
- x` ,.
r tA �� �� \\\ \
�
� Q � , ��
` o - - �` .. �� \ \ 4
; �� �
-�, .
x.
,�� O
r -
O
O�.
�,
�
>! n �'��
Z, �/� /��
� n
i� � �
� � .
� ��
y
�'�` '�`��
� �
. �
i .
r
i ' �'
< j ,�
�
�� �
� � �
�
. - -
0 j
�\ ' %.
,
� /
/
\\Y�'�
�� \
� � � .
i�
�i.
i
�
�\�/
'°°"�°" 9,oz' GOLDEN P�AK HOUSE REMODEL �"°'"°°"`�"°°`""'"a""`"
D ow 5/31/93' w.c°"�m��°"" a ��',w
� VAIL r COLORADO
• . � �
f
_0 _� , � I
' . m�---- ,
� rt I� �
i ° � �
I � � m
� Z��- ��, o 0
ao�� =0 '?'�O = � °., �i 0
i ; � � � _ o ��
��� ���;�� �= ' �� o o �
� �
�il �� : � xII C� O
°:I� i , '�O e0 � � I� � � �
��. .�. o �
.I� I
_O o !
�� � 0 � � ,� � � �
x II � �i
o ��� o
7 II � � - '~y !i �
� �o ,�� i' � �
i� � 0 :�� __ �- -- - ��? -�o� � � �
I� �Q
i i� B�Q
! ��._Q�0 �
�� � � _�
�=_ .
� �I L� p, = _
, �i � � , � c I�---- ,�,� o
II 0 � o . � a ?�� � o
�� � � o m�� _�� o
ii � � «3�
' i� .,� < I �_:
- d , � r�
�---- = o o � -=� �
m �� �� -o
�x _
i
� � -�
I � !I
� ��
i _ I I
i
I I
�� � Q
,� I
�
� '� ���Q
!; ��Q
� A -- � o "° � -o �- = a --
� rt � 0��� --
� m" = �� �J �,� �'
<�� _� I� � _°
rt�� __ =° �� � ���
� �j � ;� �-�� -�
� ;� �o �='o
x� �j__ ' � ° _�
� � li ��� _o
� � _�
,
, m�
i � =o I �� �� _
_ � �
�---- � �.� i;,u �_��
O L:r O �_—
r-Z:
a '°°""'°" 9ioz GOLDF `? "EAK HOUSE AFA►1�ODEL �"°"'°°""°"°"`"°'"`"`°' (
N o.. s�3 vs3' � s�m.c,.n.�. �m a►m,
va cao.m nsi
vAi�. . �.eRA�o
�::.r�=wa• s .
�1
• • . •
./���:.�
J�3
��l
r ' '� ,
� • , , ` I. �
, 1�, .1 I � u
.'
1-�
� ��.
. -1 � . , • � `�� .
� . �
, . � I �.�� -
I . N
, i . �. j �
° _ ��.: � . �/ ' , ! '�
1 1 i I i i..'�
�I ' ,f 'f I;� � ,� i
' � t ,��. `• , • I I � �.
, '. � � 3 . � . �,
� • � ��
�� ` �' � v i �
n � . . i 'R �` �,
. % C �, ` �� � ,� :��'
_� .� i � , s,
. ,'�, �; ,. �� � '�.:k', `� �,
, �� a� � �. + , } � �:.
.�' �;
>�r' , . �.� ;
.:,, �?
�•�'�� ,; ; i , ./ ,I '� ,.,,
� � , K
� ' � � � , i
� / i ; ii
: �� ' � � , .. ; � , ��
. +u ; . . �; .�; t
. ; \ � �:
t�� . �� �.. � , ,''f , x:
• , � � .�.
' .. • � : �f.., ,
. � iF.
� � �,.
[. ; � i
. I 1 �
; ' . � . . �• .
� . � . I
. � � •
i
' ; , i ,
. 1 !
� . , ' ' . . I . .
I
�{�
""'"' t02 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL ' ���•� `�
�i � Na�nY I• � � .� ; • • ' . � ::r." �� �
, VAII�� �CO�ORADO :� ;� r �� i
« • , , .
. �.. ` � -
�, �
i ! ,
I
I. .
j ./ ,�
t �� f \ i
_ �
. G
�. �
a �
` �'
. ���:�����:::::��:���:
�•
J` �,
rh . ,»;
���
F p
ti � Q
�
1 � L:
�
\
1� � �
� � ��� ' �
0
\.
a � 'a
4 � \ ♦
P � a
I
' � �\
P. �% `•
/ � /
i 9 < Y' e
�
d
i
�
. �
�
.Q' � .
� ��
M C�
� , v I \
� �� �
0 O i ''�,.
� •
r'
�I
Z� .
, �!
•
, � �°"°'�" 9102� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL °^°�°°^�°"°°�'�•"�°
D . e�o..ara.. awmi
.�� o.. s�at�9� M..om..e .�.,
_ VAIL ., COLORADO. .
+ .
� � .
�
./�./ ��.� �
� .K � ..\
_J_ i
I \
i � ;° 1 �
ir :�� �
0
•. m o
,� . ,
, 1• •�
� Y m 7l
�. � ' � 1
1�'I �I � '�-
� • �� � �� �
I � � ' \
� � � I
, I � w, : .�\111//
. I � � I
1 � g ; \;�a ' i
t =
� � �� � A � �
;
. i ♦ iRl ��' �,\ i
, � ,; � �
'i j ;�;\ �
�
: � ��� � � ' � �� �
� �c'�
�=• I .�
` i� �
M
�,' r, � � I /
Y , � '�.
� �� �
µ � ��;�; .
.., ���.;
. ,
. ,,
,, ,,, .
� - � ,��. ,,
. • , �..
:A \�\\\�\� .. ,
� � t \ '
��� � � '
. p
�
,9 . , • �' .
�' . .
,
.
�
. - •
� ,
, � � ' . i•
. � � .
�'�~� •10L �GOLDEN PEAi� �OUSE REMODEL `� + ''""°°"""°""'"""°
� o� aov�Y '` • � �,� .� . . �=='- �^� �
� VAIL,� �COLORADO • - .; �'!
. ;
. �::. �
o � � . • � .
� • � � • � .�
p _�I =�1�
11�1:...:�=:� `►,
� � ���=1 �t` �-.
,:�_ I i�
,:acif - �, -
I/���, _ �=1 (i� _;�/�
':1=� L� �c^ �� (.�
� _ ���= s
'��- ��:� ���1
� e
� ° �:r. -�"._i'Z=f ��I � �f11
�'; �1_ �
■��• _ ����� ��',
I • H� -- �
� i��
i - ;�� ;� :n,
�� � _.
� .. ,��__,�-��:��
�� ': � �� ��=►;�:
I,�� � �I_I �
� �� --
,����� �"- ��� -
'7�.�j �„� ��i
,.,� �:-,�....,_
„��'�.�.' r--�' _�' �
; ���I �I �
'..' �, �i-
� �1��=,�:: ���� _�i �
Ei �-- °��� d-��:a�
•�����.�:i�L� -� � -«:--t�,�3�'�,..�.
I��j�� ii.:l i��i =��— ����II,..I;�U�
�� _� f�,II C=� �' � � .! 'w
�ii=� —_� "� � � ■r ���. r■
�1 __ ;_� �i.�i. - ii I �t
' i�=1 �.=. .:� .� �� � �I�■�
-_ ;�� I.._ ..: I_
��� �_���_, � �'���•i�� :.I��C
�-��. -w; - ,i ,_� . , _ .
(L--�� ���IL!��,� ,�`� ••I ■11
��»i 1��� ',' � !� I
=1 :. i�.�iln � � ��, ■��
.z. —e �� ■■.' ��7
��j���";� '��v� - '� ..
`4 �� � �■�I � ^I ■I� \� Y� _ �
I 7� J
\ '�� � •^I! � �si � � �. ���. �II� �
���� � � � - -� �= •
����� -�II � ' � �/� � " 1
` ;� t f.:l•! � _ (� � �� ��
��� __��=� �-�I' ��' i�R � �.�� '�~ ��;
=�� ��� �!' � `" �.� �.= .;� _
'�: I�� 6 I� �I �*.._. Si�
�--�=F �i fr� 1 ���— = �� —�� -
��;�� �.� �_� �I! ��_�' �� ■:.���o
E ii.�. '�= �`= -�I ��= ■�
,,� -, r��,r_�I� ��= �,�� _ _ ��
_;� i. ,�� ,�� ,;_.� ��, ,� �; i
� �� ��:� ,...� �.-.:1u1��s:.
;.� ;�z -� .� �^j ��
��ia��� _ +, "�� _��
�j�!�' �� I� Il�llt �� iI�_�.--
�• ,� , , ��� �. ::�� - .I�_ '�
: �i i�"iw I��I �.. ��,1.�.
+�,� �a " •��i�: � —
���
�lll����l�ty� IF
� � OQ11dO10� ` ll� N
i �• ,,,
i ...»„ ...��'.w Failciu !"'
1 �r�N'��f������µ���M l3QOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N30lOJ �o►e"=►�«.� 4
L—_
a�
�
�
J
. <
Z
<
' � W
0
<
S
�
. �
. \ ` _
. l7/� �. tA
,� ((('—' . I
�� o
. �\ � t '
�\ � —� e
✓. a �
. \ W _
F
� \
. , )
� ` ��� �
• � � �
� � /
\ \/
.`
. �\ �� ��` �� \.
///��� � \
�`` , �� �\ , , � \
�` �,.t � \ J S �
,� `�� � • �� � ,,� \ .
. ,,, \ / :'>. \
: ; `� , V� ��``� .%
� " � �� � � %\
.`` �.:� �3•'� � .• .L; ,
.\ � i
��\� \`� : •� .
� � �
•� •� �`i
t.3 \��� �. ��S . ' • �
wL, \ � a�, �• l
� �� �•. - �� ` •
,
\,� t" � �
� t,. � :
$° `\\�t �`` `����a� �`���i��Y� .1 i'� � 1-
t� � ? ,� -- T�-�?`� '� � �\ �� � U i
\ a0. / � / O
•`• \ /t'� .. ` \ � I �
P�,=I �/ f,�// � ���� 'y \v\ `` la� ' •
'� d� ' , c
��t `- �' -� �
.� ��� � r� j .
y_� ` .
�� y �� �
.`` �x\ \ _��
=�G,/ �` �� ` � � � I
i� �} �js
/ _y���' %�1� ~ .'��_EZ���` —; --+--- �"\ - •--� c- ...�
,/j � �
�� --
i �
�
�` ,, .
\
� � -�.�.
/ a �
� __..� �� i
`� 1 1 � �.
� •
��- . .
�g
. , }� n_�__
1 _ _ _
� �""' Oat/liOlO� "�fdA '�t� , .
�.. ...�,�., • E6/t6/B +n r'
rvs �.e.�orer �
•�•-+�p-� l3aOW3a 3Sf10H �t/3d N3alOJ zo►a -�•••� a�
� F � .
t
4 i
3
�
i TL �� T�
lv � �I
r-- ; I
i , •.
+ -- � --- --- --- �
.�
. i � � e
I y • - F, .
� Q ■ (A 0
I Y
� � � W �
I I � � � � N o W �
� o i d1 � � o o • df •
,j •� .Q � � - ; ♦ � � � �
� I � < o • J \ • �
C t i E' _
F - . �' = Y � �
j ¢ Q �
• �p I = �°n � W
rr �v F- '� d
� i I � i •y -� Q
� � � ir o Q =
i � � / O . N k,,,
/ f � •
O `i
' ' .O ❑ _�_ � � ^ y O
L_ _ 6 s � .
- i � ~
(�— � ' � :: oWi.
3 � ---- --- --- -- —
� � �
�t S� . i
. . � �� .
ii a
tF si
� � �
= 4 '
b� I�rF � �S�
�
-�-i� _, (. �- _�.�__ . -
. � J - �
I -- ------ -- m •
� W
� ` 3 ,
� � �� E ' �
�„ s ; o � t w .
� ; m _ _;_. ; \.
. ¢ •
¢ p : �� ' h: _ .
0 �N ...I • \ � O O � • .
'G � � ' � �O A N N �
♦ I : N = . ~ • ' �
. � '� I ' 9 f- �; �
� -. •n 7 =
I „ • . ' O 53 �
Y a� � � ' "' �° -. �
I -- - -:- :o a ;-„� .
' . W � � ^ : e o
I � � . � � . � a ~
.e � � _ 'd n
-- -a ' -- I ' ' `> � a
.- . : -
.` p .
�� I�
�� }3 --- ._�. . .
� I� �
�� �3
• � � . • •
�
� • • � �
, t %��
'il� ■�I
���� �1��
��� -
���:� ��^ - 18/ :.
�`�)�� :. �
� � ,�-- :a,=�„ ..
„ � �� !;� ,��
.., — �
� _ ,_._ i�
� - �� �
�� $� �,,,
I � i =.;;�a�I��
:�II� �� �i����'i'�'
� �
-
�'� ��" -�
,��II ��I �1
,����� � �,�
�'_�rt' =� �� ��G
�I���i�' �� �i:�,
'�� ��� ��il �� ���,.
���� _ �
��� ���f��� _1� C I ���'���:'■iii�
�'I�=1 1�=1 I�--�� .� ' -
- �f�1.=1 C.� --_ � •• �.
"���I� �� _ _ - /.I. �Y:
i T� -_ � -, t■ �a I ��
i�.rl i�=i L�=� �.� ■�� �J��I
I I�=1 — —
'Ii:J 1l=i �:I � 1 I�I t ii�� CI
_���; �� � _ .I._.I ��C
I��� ��;�L�.� '-- '
�� �:l � ■�i
C�I�,[-.��� � �
� • '-� -� ■.�
IA'I - �, _� .-r ■■ ���
i - _ � -
I��I � �^� o =I • _:�-� ' �
� I
�.�� • �I9 `� :�; ��I
�3a e�.= � � a - ;.. �et�-°.-._""'�...
-���I�j :l.� ��� _ �� . �� _:_� � :
�`, __ _ � _._.�
�� �=�I .:I � ( _ .r� .' .�i1
T� �`I'' i�..'--. � :ea ��^ �" i-- ^I __'
_ '1�� �l�l �..� ��.
�■ r ;_� ( ��- �_ _ _: -=
��• L� ,-_ �� �� �� �•y�eo
_ i�^ �_ __ �) ,�_ _
I��`�CI�� ��= ,.� — ��
.��� � �,i ���I (�y � .:z� ��
��I �, ��� I— II..� �.�;�,�iE�,����..�;
��1� � l ._,.; r�i 1 �r �- �� ��
�.; r�..+ �.. ��- ,
� -�.� �� �— ,._, �
►!.■ ;; ���' `II�III ���;��/��I
,,1� - ��, i! ...... - �, _ ,-
s: r: � .. �'I�:=r �
�� at: �-• �i�) �� -- _-,�l�,
au -�i •e��= ����.
—_j � ��I
,.,. ..,.�.,
oanaoio� � �ien N .
�s ���� 1300W3b 3Sf10H �1�3d N30lOrJ .cei�sio -o a •
�Mav•w+�1+�w�+V+�+i yote �ouw pr (
. ,
� ,
_ a
_ �
� ',� � �0
// �, � �
� \
��Y \ 'CC �
.
� �i
i �
'. �
'�� , ,/
� ` ��\
� �
' � `•
,•/ ,�%� ' s��� \ 1
/�i • %C \
' � �\ \
.. �� — � � ' ��� \ .
\`s ' ''
��"� �� �� ;-. '. , \` �"
� �<
,1` :. 1 \
� ` �. ��cS
� �`' �
� � I
� _�y
\ � ��
\�� `\\ �' /, � )i \\` "
' ` \ � .
\ �/
� ' � .
i\` .i ; .
� � � i�
, t.��? �
�� ��� .
. , :
. � ���
�t� �'=
� I
I •
: �
I
. . �_ _i r _
. � � .
�'\ i— ----i �..�
'�..��.
o ►
. �
• �.., � ,.r�
,� OadliOlO� ` IIdA �-
�
, .�,. ....o., � • �ai�eio .a �:
� '°'°" "°"°"°" l3QOW3b 3S(lOH �t/3d N3UlOJ �a
.o.�Nr..ro�w�w..no-°"c Fo�e ....r.x
O
� o
�
Z
. . <
J
d �
� '
• . ••� . O 0
'O �
/t ' � �
// .
\ � \
' i' `� .i!i
.�:j
= / �•. .
_ _ 0 . �
�
• .�\
�_,�����
. • � `\
/ ��`\
, ,// /> � � � �\.
�� • �..
� � � \ ' \.
� /
�\� o \\ ��
\ \
. � � �� � � :
� `,� ����
�� .�� �a�`
\ +� /� 1
�
\ \ /
�
� I
I
I
� � I
� • � � .
I
-•-•----� r � ..:
L� .�---� .
. . ��.'y.�.-/ .
. .
oana0lo� � �ien 'b �
C:.s . ..�.-�'� � �si�s�o � w�
�..�a.� �3aOW3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ zo�s -•�•�•� ;�. `�
,
� . .
Y
, .
Z
. ��
' 'J
¢
. . a+
• � . . o .
',.0,►0
y,i_�
. ��'�',�., � q
/ o.,� �: �
� .�i �\, + , � �
i' � •
;
��
� �
�
i i
�/ J i\'
,��
� ��li i .
Y�'� .�,�, , .�
�. � �.
�
_ � ���� ;� ,�� .�. . �,� �. .
\� � ,I .
��\\ . �b .
. . ��
�
�
I
. � . . -
. . M.
�
. i • `
. 'i • o • ` . . 't
� �� .
. �
i
• o
♦--� .�� ;
. . ����.�� .'�.i../ .
� �'" OddliOlv� ` IiMA ���.
�,. ..�.. �eai�sia ,.a
�� ����
,�> .�..��.� l3QOW3li 3Sf10H �Itl3d N3alOJ ��• -•-Mw ��`
.
. �
� � :
� . . � �
. . � �
� ;
. �o :
Ip '
. ' ��. :
��. \�� ; �
.�
.�
.
N , `\` �\��: '
M �' \\
•� ^ ``\\
'r � ��
O . ,�
w
� ^ �.�. .
/ ' � .
° P' �� �:
^ yi
, •� , � ��, II� .! �
/ !1 I
\ � , I �\
\\\ .'Q
\ � '."I
� ��
:� ��,� •�
- s S;
.,\ \
� w �;
� ' '�,,� . '�i
��;
p '.
O' � ��
w.� w
. ! ' ��.
I
: •
�:
• . 1
� '
,wj��
`�"j
� -- -- -___- _
V�� /. _
�
'�,..-
I ��� �� �
� r �..�. _ �
°a � �
0 C l 4 1995
�M Y � ���A799 �rl'�1�9 ����.
October 3, 1995
Mr. Tom Moorehead
Town of Vail
110 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
The survey by Intermountain Engineering has determined that there are three points along
the north face of the new Golden Peak House which are over the property line by approximately
3/8", 2 5/8" and 6". All three encroachments are within the existing easement belonging to the
Golden Peak House. Additionally, footings approximately ten feet below grade extend into the
easement area at various points along the northern property line.
The Developer of the Golden Peak House seeks an easement from the Town of Vail to
allow the above encroachments into the easement area at the Town Council meeting scheduled
for October 1�, 1995. In the alternative, the Developer agrees to remove the encroachments
above grade at Developer's expense, such work to be completed by October 27, 1995. Based
upon these agreements, Developer requests that the Building Department be allowed to make
framing and other subsequent inspections beginning October 4, 1995.
GPH Partners, Ltd.
!���,CG�'� r
Clazk S. Willing „
General Partner
• � � ,• * . • � �
r . ,
� 4�.,..r ....
-
.�'�..-� D .
ORDINANCE NO. 28 ' �
�� '
C SERIES OF 1993 '�
\_
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF
THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; REZONING A PORTION OF TRACT E FROM AGRICULTURAL
AND OPEN SPACE ZONING TO COMMERCIAL CORE 1 ZONING, AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
;
�
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development —
dist�icts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS,the developer.Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Mlargaritaville, Inc. or the successors in interest, has submitted an
application for the establishment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31, which inciudes
a request for a Commerciai Core I exterior alteration, a request for a minor subdivision, and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1, for a certain parcel of property within the
Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C. Block 2, and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village First
Filing and commonly referred to as the Goiden Peak House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS,the developer has submitted an application to rezone a portion of Tract E,Vail
Village Fifth Filing, more specifically described in the attached Exhibit A,from the Agricultural and
Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone district; and
WHEREAS, the rez�ning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediately
.,
adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort will better reflect the actual use of the land; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is for the benefit of the community as it meets the
muniapal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on October 11, 1993, held a public hearing on the establishment of an SDD and the
rezoning, and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
1
Ordinarws No.28.Saies d 19D3
\fr
` � � � �
' • �. i
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate pardes; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial
to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to establish SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as'required by Chapter 18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Counal flnds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
SECTION 2
Special Development District No.31 is established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space,employee housing,streetscape improvements and othe�amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental
Commission, and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
.
Special Development District No.31 is established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District
No. 31 and said 8,375 square feet may be refeRed to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4 �
The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in
Section 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all of the
requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been
fully satisfied.
SECTION 5
The Town Counal hereby rezones that portion of Tract E legally described in the attached
2
Ordinencs No.28.Ssriss d 1993
�
.� , ' • � ' � �
' • �,.,. i
Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and Open Space zone district to the Commerciai Core I zone
district.
SECTION 6
The Town Council finds that the development plan for SDD. No. 31 meets each of the
standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or
demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accorciance with Section 18.40.040, the
development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The development plan is comprised of those
plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the following documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6. dated October 25, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, 1993 (second floor pian).
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated October 25, 1993 (third floor plan).
6. Sheet No. A-10, dated October 25, 1993 (fourth floor plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12. dated October 25, 1993 (roof p�an).
9. Sheet No. A-13. dated October 25, 1993 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View CoRidor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Speciai Development District.
SECTION 7
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 6 above,the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these
standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the
development of SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31: �
A. Lot Area- The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks - The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans.
C. Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Buiiding shall be as
3
ordn.nce No.ze.s«;s.a,es3
. . � ., . � . � ' � �
. � �
indicated on the Approved Development Pians.
D. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not
exceed 18,715 square feet. This figure includes 2,847 square feet of excess common area that
has been included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes �
fourteen (14) dwelling units and iwo (2) accommodation units, for a total of fifteen (15) dwelling
units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage-The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7�874 square feet, or 94% of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plans.
F. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accorclance with the Approved
Development Plans.
G. Parking -As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code,Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all properties located within the Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Partcing shall be provided by GPH Partners,
Ltd. paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The required number of parking spaces, in
accordance with the Approved Development Plan for SDD No. 31, shall be a total of 13.794
parking spaces. Payment into the parking fund shall occur at the time of Buiiding Permit�
according to Section 18.52.160(B,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 8
The developer. Jointly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are
a part of the Town's approval of the establlshment of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD
No. 31, GPH Partners, Lki. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, finro-
bedroom, employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shail be
a minimum si2e of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance
requirements i�d eu�f� ��lts shell b�e wlfhin tk�Tt�'n�Vs11:.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment
project,the Golden Peak House Condominlum Assoclation will contribute$32,000.00 towards
the redesign and redevelopment of Seibert Circie. The $32,000 contribution towards the
�edevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a
future Special Improvement District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project�Vall Assoctates, Inc.,wili dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open
4 '
o�d:�.�.rb.zs.s«�..�,a�
• - ' . t
• • . '' � �
4,
space shall be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck"
easements. A �prtic� �,t��111[Ct�k��reerti� t�r�vitt b�?:dedlCBt�tl t��t�?C►wtt t3��t#�1
89'�er�rt�r�ht t�peri Sp�Ce�hd��e PicA#� SMIp Paric�rsa p�Tr� �:w�11 be le�ed�o �he
Tnw�of Yaf1 for�he purp� a�ma)nt�Inlnq,#he park, :T#r��er�ns c�tt� i�as�;�re tv;�r�
�►gr�+d uporl b�r:;tt�+�-p�t�i�.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Assoclatlon and Vail Associates,
Inc. �hali:reserv��pub�lc:�ec�es#rian acsces�,�crvss Got�x�rhlch�s it�+cated be�inreen#h�
Gal�e� �eak Ho�e and the HEfI ;B�aildin�, b� decfar�tion to 6e�rd�d>wlth �t�e:�1�
CC�nfy Recorc�er. �uch�ec[ara�ton�h�aEl be�r�ne�t�nd�nly�r�evc�cabl+��p�n wrEtt+��
�greement wlth t�Tawn�ot�'�t :Th�dectara�ton..�sf publtc p�destrC��aaces�at�at�c�trr
�rlor ta�h��'�awn'��ssttatt�e 4��b�i�dln� permi#f�r the RroJi�.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in�short-term rental program, �i��p�►�p�:�tlark+gq#��.;;
at all times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining finro lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a sho�t-term rental program, �tt�mp�rabte:nt�r�t
_ _
��±�5; at all times when sald lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict,the two accommodation units(or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in i�i€short-term rental prog�am,�:�ot�iip�i�l�;�rii��
i;��es;at all times when said aocommodatlon units are not occupied by the owner or his or her
guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominlum Association, or their successo�s
in interest, shall participate in. and shaii not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement
district(s) which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing
improvements as set forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail
Transportation Master Plan, if and when an improvement district(s) is formed.
�� T�`��t�h�t�Id� P�ak�w��r�tn{�aium 11s�ti��[nr�a���d���ti_�ar�ar�;
�.#d,$����p��a#�w1fh,��d�ha�t t��t pt"+�t����etrl��tr�:�i���Ety�ri�by�h�
T�a��t'� �sf:�/�t:tt1:`::��ti�f�h:i�dd�t�r�� �k�+iir::::i�:+i�r�#+�r� ��r:;:'�i�t�s��i�i�::tE�:::�3i��itr........:>x#�iv
,, ,.. _ .:,.:, _ .,. , .. ._ .. >.:. _ >.:,_ ::<.._ ,..,:.. ,::. :.::. . .._..:�I.. .::_....
+fx�,ic�tra����ha���y#tte Rrc��� .St�h;�r�s�n��ft�:�:;�h�tt��t�c�nt�.
5
Ord'nanos No.28.Ssriss d 1�83
. • . . . "'� ' _ � �
. � �
th�Mun[���at�o�a�#�"��v�rc�ot v�t�:
1 p: That the pedestrian arcade (whlch was originaily proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include
the curved retail windows along the eastem portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design
Review Board and inciuded in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11:: That GPH Partners, Ltd.further articulate the first floor"retaii windows",by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry
on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
1� That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 9
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may
be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public
hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments
which do change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by
Town Council after the above procedure has been foilowed. The Community Development
Department shall deteRnine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
SECTION 10
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three
(3) years from the time of its final approvai, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. '�'#��d+�V�1±�p�r mi��t�#���.t�+q�ttr�3�nt�A�'�d��4�'�#��.'��.4����unf�tp�l
C�di��f�h�Tc�m af Y��4
SECTION 11 .
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid, such decision shali not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection� sentenc;e, clause or phrase thereof� regarclless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 12
The Town Council hereby finds�deteRnines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 13
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Munic(pal Code as
,
6
ONinanos No.2B.Serks d 1�93
,- � �• '. � . � � •
• � *�
provided in this or�dinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occuRed prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other acfion or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed o�repealed
and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON
FIRST READING this 19th day of October, 1993, and a public hea�ing shall be heid on this
Ordinance on the 2nd day of November, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Muniapal Building, Vail, Colorado.
l.+'
Margare A. Ostertoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
�
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Cle�{c
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
IN FULL this 2nd day of November, 1993.
Margaret . Ostertoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
�op`�r��Cu.�k.�.�i� �
Holly L. McCutcheon, Towr� Clerk
c:�o�se
7
Ordlnanos No.28.Ssriss d 1oD3
� � �
.
. �
M"
ty
TOWN OF VAIL � '
75 South Frontage Road Department of Communiry Develop�nent
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138/479-2139 �
FAX 303-479-2452
December 10, �993
Ms. Susan Bird
1771 Aipine Drive
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Golden Peak House redevelopment
Dear Susan:
Your letter dated December 7, 1993 indicates that you are interested in restricting the
secondary unit on your primaryJsecondary project Iccated at 1771 Alpine Drive, for the specific
purpose of fulfilling one of the requirements of the Golden Peak House redevelopment. This
restriction will need to be in accordance with the employee housing chapter of the Town of
Vail Zoning Code (Chapter 18.57), which would enable you to restrict this unit as a Type I
emplcyee housing unit.
The restriction on this secondary unit, as an employee housing unit, will in no way prevent you
from requesting an additional 250 square feet of additionai GRFA, according to Chapter 18.71
of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. In order to obtain the 250 square feet, the Design
Review Board (DRB) must first approve the request. This assumes that no "250" has been
requested in the past for your property.
I hope this information meets your needs, however, if you should have any further questions
or concerns, please do not hesitate t� call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
��,��` �
11t���t� �ti�
Kristan Pritz
Director of Community Development
xc: Clark Willingham
Mike Mollica
.__�%
� � �
Susan Bird �''�` � '��'
1771 Alpine Drive
Vail , CO 81657
December 7 , 1993
Via Hand Delivery
Ms. Kristin Pritz
Director of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail , CO 81657
Re: Willingham deed restriction
Dear Kristin:
You have requested a letter outlining the agreement I have
reached with Mr. Willingham concerning the Type 3 deed restriction
I have agreed to put on my residence. Our agreement is that I will
execute a deed into myself restricting the lower level apartment
located in my residence at 1771 Alpine Drive, Vail , Colorado, to
rental as employee housing in accordance with the Town of Vail
,' ordinance governing Type �3� Employee housing units, provided that
such restriction will not p�event me from obtaining Town of Vail
approval of the addition of 250 square feet of GRFA to my principal
residence referred to above.
Before I close my agreement with Mr. Willingham, I need from
the Town of Vail a written agreement that the Town of Vail will
approve my application for an additional 250 square feet of GRFA
after the deed restriction has been recorded. I plan on applying
for the addition next spring.
If you have any further questions, please call me at 476-2695
or 476-2662 . I look forward to hearing from you.
Very truly you ,
.�1Avyl r
Susan Bird
\ � � '
• � �
, `^�
\
�`�
�7
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of Town Attorney
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2107/FAX 303-479-2157 �
Post-It'"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 N of pages ► 8
To GERRy ARNOLd FromToM /y►vc�RN�A�
c�. V� ��. To v
De t.
P Pho�e# y7�^� /O,7
�/79-av
November 4, 1993 ex" ry Fex� y��_ ��r'
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Gerry Arnold
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Gerry:
Attached is what we hope to be the final draft of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993. You will �
note that the changes made pursuant to the Council's discussion on November 2, 1993, are
in bold print and shaded.
It is my understanding that you will forward this ordinance to Clark Willingham for his
consideration. If you believe that there are any required changes, additions, or deletions
based upon Council's direction, please give me a call.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
� Dz
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RTM/dd
Enclo
(' xc: Mike Mollica
�
. . , . ' .. . �^ Y4Y. .
. . � i �
ORDINANCE NO. 28
SERIES OF 1993
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF
THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; REZONING A PORTION OF TRACT E FROM AGRICULTURAL
AND OPEN SPACE ZONING TO COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONING, AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS,the developer,Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. or the successors in interest, has submitted an
application for the establishment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31, which includes
a request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration, a request for a minor subdivision, and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1, for a certain parcel of property within the
Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village First
Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS,the developer has submitted an application to rezone a portion of Tract E, Vail
Village Fifth Filing, more specifically described in the attached Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and
Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone district; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediately
adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort will better reflect the actual use of the land; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is for the benefit of the community as it meets the
municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on October 11, 1993, held a public hearing on the establishment of an SDD and the
rezoning, and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
1
Ordinance No.28,Series d 1993
�
, . , , � •
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial
to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to establish SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
SECTION 2
Special Development District No.31 is established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space,employee housing,streetscape improvements and other amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental
Commission, and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No.31 is established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District
No. 31 and said 8,375 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4
° The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in
Section 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all of the
requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been
fully satisfied.
SECTION 5
The Town Council hereby rezones that portion of Tract E legally described in the attached
2
Ordinance No.28,Seriea d 1993
_. . . . �
� , • • � �
�
Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone
district.
SECTION 6
The Town Council finds that the development plan for SDD. No. 31 meets each of the
standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or
demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the
development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The development plan is comprised of those
plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the following documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated October 25, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, y993 (second floor plan).
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated October 25, 1993 (third floor plan).
6. Sheet No. A-10, dated October 25, 1993 (fourth floor plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated October 25, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated October 25, 1993 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 7
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 6 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these
standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the .
development of SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31:
A. Lot Area - The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks - The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans.
C. Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Building shall be as
3
ordinance No.za,series of 1993
. . .,.J ... . � . . ,. � � . . .
/ . •
� i
indicated on the Approved Development Plans. �
D. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not
exceed 18,715 square feet. This figure includes 2,847 square feet of excess common area that
has been included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes
fourteen (14) dwelling units and two (2) accommodation units, for a total of fifteen (15) dwelling
units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94% of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plans.
F. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved
Development Plans.
G. Parking -As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all properties located within the Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by GPH Partners,
Ltd, paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The required number of parking spaces, in
accordance with the Approved Development Plan for SDD No. 31, shall be a total of 13.794
parking spaces. Payment into the parking fund shall occur at the time of Building Permit,
according to Section 18.52.160(6,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 8
The developer, jointly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are
a part of the Town's approval of the establishment of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD
No. 31, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-
bedroom, employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be
a minimum size of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance
requirements and such units s�all b� wlthin th� Tot+vn of Va11'.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment
project, the Golden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute $32,000.00 towards
the redesign and redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards the
redevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a �
future Special Improvement District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project, Vall Assoclates, Inc.,wilf dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open
4
Ordinance No.28,Seriea d 1993
. • +
space shall be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck"
easements. A portion bf the Mlif Cre�k stream tr'8Ct!w�it be�:dediCBted;to th� Tawn o��/,a[l
as permanent open spiace and the Pirate Ship Park area of Track � will be':I��sBd #o;th�
Tpwn of Vait fpr;the purpc�se af rn�intaining #he park. Th� terms q'�!th� lease �re to<b�
agre�d uppn by the par#[er;s.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates,
Inc. shall re�serve;'a pubtla p�destrian access, aarass Lat +C, whlch is I.ocat�d between the
Gold�n Peak House and ihe;;Hil1 ;Bu[ldJng, by;rleclarat[on';to be;re�or�led with th� Eag,le
�ount�y Recarder': Such deGtarat�Qn shal! be permanent anci ant� revacra,ble upan,wr�tfen
agreement with the 7'awn af 1/aU. The t�eclaratican of;publi� pedestriar� access shall occur
prior#o the'7owr�'s issuance,of a buiitling permit for the praj�t.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in �short-term rental program, at;;+�ampar�bte',mark�t r�tes;'
at all times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a short-term rental program, �f Comparable m�rt�
r�tes, at all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the iwo accommodation units(or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in �short-term rental program, �t�vmip�rable m�ri�±�t
_.
r8test,at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her
guests. �
' 8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Associatfon, or their successors
in interest, shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement
district(s) which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing
improvements as set forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail
Transportation Master Plan, if and when an improvement district(s) is formed.
9: Tha#the�G+�tdan Pe�k �laus� �ni�omin��rn Asst�c�at[t�t�;�nd GPH Partners;
Ltd.Shall cc�perate with, �Ttd shall;;not protest!v�`.�em�t��lst�3 �gai�7St>�ny,�ffortS by the
Town ,of Vail to �st�blish addltfanai r�iew.corrldors +�r !;amendm�r�ts ta. +�xl��[ng ul�w
�vrrld.ors a� en�anc�d;;by th±e prqj���, �uch �;f��ttges and a+�dCtivns sh�ti be pursuan�t�3
5
Ordinance No.28,Series of 1993
I
. , . - • •
the MuniCip�t �ade af the T+�wn of VaEi�
10'. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include
the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design
Review Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
1'!. That GPH Partners, Ltd.further articulate the first floor"retail windows",by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry
on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
13. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 9
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may
be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public
hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments
which do change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by
Town Council after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development
Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
SECTION 10
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three
(3) years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. Th�developer must meet;#he r�u�rem�er�ts of�e�Ct�c�n �!S 40 ��4 of;:t#�e 1fAurt[c�pal
COd�,of#he;TQwn of Vai I�
SELTION 11
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 12
The Town Council hereby finds,determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 13
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
6
Ordinance No.28,Series o(1993
I , . , . ' . �
�
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed
and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON
FIRST READING this 19th day of October, 1993, and a public hearing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the 2nd day of November, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorada
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST: �
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
IN FULL this 2nd day of November, 1993.
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
C:�ORD9328
7
Ordinance No.28,Series of 1993
� �
u
�y
TOWN OF YAIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of Town Attorney
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2107/FAX 303-479-2157
November 22, 1993
Mr. Jim Lamcnt
Box 1387
Vail, Colorado 81658
RE: The Referendum Process
Dear Jim:
Pursuant to your request concerning the Charter provision regarding memorandum petitions,
I have reviewed the Charter of the Town of Vail and also had discussions with Peggy
Osterfoss. The referendum process is governed by the Charter of the Town of Vail, the
Statues of the State of Colorado, and the Colorado Case Law. The information provided
herein is not intended to be an exhaustive study of the petitioning process, nor is it intended
to be legal advice.
Article 5, Initiative and Referendum provides in Section B that the registered electors of the
Town shall have the power to require reconsideration by the Council of any ordinance and,
if the Council fails to repeal an ordinance so reconsidered, to approve or reject it at a Town
election.
Any five (5) registered electors may commence referendum proceedings by filing with the
Town Clerk an a�davit stating they will constitute the petitioners' committee and be
responsible for circulating the petition and filing it in proper form stating their names and
addresses and specifying the addresses to which all notices to the committee are to be sent
and setting out in full the proposed initiative ordinance or signing the ordinance sought to
be reconsidered.
It is my understanding that you are considering a referendum petition concerning the
ordinances in regard to the Golden Peak House and the Vail Athletic Club. Those ordi.nances
were adopted by the Council on November 2, 1993. Therefore,the referendum petitions must
be filed within thirty (30) days after that date to be reconsidered.
The referendum petitions must be signed by registered electors of the Town equal in number
�
� �
Jim Lamont
November 22, 1993
Page 2
to at least ten percent (10%) of the total number of electors registered to vote at the last
regular municipal election. That number is 289.
Once the referendum petition has been finally determined to be sufficient, the Council shall
properly reconsider the referred ordi.nance by voting its repeal. The repeal of any referred
ordinance may be affected only by a three-fourths (3/4) majority vote of the entire Council.
The Charter provides for the vote of the Town on a referred ordinance shall be held not less
than thirty (30) days and not later than ninety (90) days from the date of the final Council
vote thereon. It will be necessary to determine whether or net �uch an election can be
conducted in light of the requirements of Amendment One.
I hope this information is helpful to you. There are additional requirements eoncerning the
circulation of the petitions, their form and content, and the affidavit of the circulator. These
specific requirements will be discussed further at the time such petitions are issued.
Very truly yours,
� ���z�
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RTM/dd
xc: Vail Town Council
Clark Willingham
Stan Cope
' j • . •
� �Vail ' ��
Vail Associates, Inc.
Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver Creek�Resorts
HAND DELIVERED November 2 , 1993
Vail Town Council
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Open Space Parcel Dedication
Golden Peak House SDD Ordinance No. 28, Series 1993
Dear Council Members :
Vail Associates understands the concern of the Town Council
regarding the reconfiguration of the Dedication Parcel and has
done a preliminary study for a walking path from Hanson Ranch
Road to the bicycle path south of Cyranos . Based upon this
study, Vail Associates is willing to adjust the configuration of
the Dedication Parcel to the parcel outlined on the attached map.
The revised configuration is calculated to be approximately 3 , 370
square feet .
To clarify the timing on the transfer and to permit time to
accomplish the necessary replatting, we would like to be
consistent with the language in the Ordinance in committing to
transfer the Dedication Parcel prior to issuance of a building
permit for the Golden Peak House.
Please let me know if the above adjustments are acceptable.
We look forward to the continued co-operative efforts of Vail
Associates and the Town of Vail in this matter.
Sincerely,
VAIL CIAT S, INC.
�►, G�`�
Chris Rym n
Sr. Vice President
cc: Clark Willingham
Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA— (303) 476-5601
r��
r'i� • � • �
_`
!!�I �_
,
.�
,
,
� �v
�/
�I � -
-
, � �
s
i �
I I � ?
� � ,� �I�.
���J , . , . � .
n
; �� :.=
; , _
% �'
,, ,�
t ='
—
` ' ;�, �I -
' ����'�1
_ �
�� � '�
�� � �
� ������.
r:_
� �1 . ������
� ■ .....
� �., - -- - -- -
�� ', �
� ��,i � w•
�_..�.,._-- - -
��
j.�� - - �
��•:.•.e•.. ;l:r'
��' � � � � � � �
� ��� � � � � �
•��
��
• • • � �:r � i: . � . �
. .
' � •
.
. . . . . . .
„� . \ \
• ` . . ' �,y\ y�}'q, � , ,,�
' � `�
x • \
I r ��k �bo t' �— ��
� �y+ ' � tO' �'fl � i
�y�P� o� �►
. k , . I� , �.,.�.. 'y41 �.^
, ' r 7
. � 3�� , � t �p��'9�►�'
. � -jQ �,�
. � , , 30
r
. � . x �� ; '
u � :
� �N ! ' �•.� ,�+i?► �ho,
I � ��,gtM� °�= ��
#� ', i� �0 r \ � � -;
� '
. , , ,. ,
x � / 1 ��"� ,,1��,"�
�� r0p1 ��' i !, .� ,
�;� 4 ,�i, ; � �µoN�'� , 1� .
r�'�” :�� � � '
�.i�. , , . � \ ,
,� ,' , , ,,
. ,
,� � , , ,
:,. ` , , ,�"
. � . � � �.
��� � � � . ;
a ' , � ,�,
ta ' � ,
� .A���. i � � �
o� ,�r�"� ,
�r� .�a�*� _
I \ �
,
. `II ' �� � \
���� � � � � � �
. y
k i
i � ,
�
�� � . �
' i
�. � ';\
. ` \ �� •�
� •
. �. �` • \1 �� . � �
. '� •�.
` '� ` \�%
', X �� ,1
��\� \� • 1 �� .
�y \ \ �
f ' �. x �` t �y � �
1 � '.�
. � \ �
• . , � �� g �.
.. � . �
. �
�N�a �P h �� � ; �a6"aa
��.
. ,�M�N� Ma
,�' � �ia���a ��
i
' _ REC��� Nav - � 19�3
,
,� __._ . ,.� .� ..� . _ . .. ... .__.__... _.�.. �.. .
� ..
_ .. .. ��
���
r ' �
o condominium aportment
• � �� 1 �1�1 1 �1�� �� I
I - ��' �/1� / �� ,�1■ M"M�1 I�
_ ,�,..�..,�+--...,. __,...� �
,�,, - �
i
Vail Town Council November 2 , 1993 �
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mayor Osterfoss and Town Council Members:
A protest is hereby submitted concerning the application
requesting designation of the Gnlden Feak House(GPH� �� a
Special Development District(SDD) . �
The creation of the Special Development District is
opposed because:
* The GPH SDD proposal exceeds all zoning standards for
, the Commercial Core I zone district, according to planning
staff inemoranda.
* The existing building exceeds all zoning standards,
according to planning staff inem�randa.
* The expansion of the buildir�g beyond zoning standards
or an expansion of a non-conforming condition is a grant of
special privilege not generally available to all property
owners.
* Unfashionable architecture or failure of the property
owners to maintain properly a building is insufficient cause
to exceed zoning standards.
* The expansion of the building encroaches into the
Vail Village View Corridor.
It is recognized that the zoning code �,�ovides fcr ti�
right of the property owner to replace the structure to its
present configuration should it become destroyed. Therefore,
it is recommended that any alteration to the structure be
done within the confines of the existing building envelope.
As a consequence, the building would qualify for the required
variances necessary to reconfiqure the interior space and
upgrade the building exterior.
In our judgement there is insufficient demonstration of
benefit to the community and neighborhood to justify the
approval of the Special Development District application.
The Town Council is requested to deny the application for a
Special Development District for the Golden Peak House.
Sincerely,
THE VORLAUFER CONDOMINIUr1 ASSOCIATION
BY: ����� � u��Lvvi n-� .���—-/�.
Edward B. Wasson, President �����j / �j'
��. ��
� COLORADO � --_- � � . ..
t 4
� �
' .LAST vILI.AGE HOxVIEOWNEYLS A,SSOC�ATI�N� 111�C.
OE��r.es: P�roarrr-Bob Galvin Secner�mr-Grtc�o Parks 'I�asunK�-patrjck cramm
MpBCTOA6 - Dwigbt Bcssmcr . �niph BriJgewaoer • EIlie C�ulkins . Rnn Lanpley - $i111�iorton - C�nnic iLidrler
To: Mayor 06terfoss and Vai1. TQwn Counail Members
Fro�n: Jf�t Lamon�, Plaruiir�g Ccnsultant .
Qate: October 18, 1993
REz 6olde2i Peak House !
Sp�cial Developmesit d�.strict Applfaation
A protest is her�by sula�nitted an behali oP the East
village Iiomeownars Associativn of the application rec�uesting
8esignation of the Golden Peak House (GPH) as a Special
Dev�l,ogment Di�trict (SDDj .
It• i�s th� position of th� Hameowners Asst+ciation to
oppa�e th� creatian of Spe�ial Development DistriGts that:
1. E�caeed zoning standards for established zone �
districts.
2 . Vialate established or proposed view corr3dors and
op�n space lands.
3. Secomes a grant of sp��ial privilege, lr�ot generally
xvailabla to all property awn�rs.
4 . For existing buildings, any provi�ion that would
cause an already exceeded zoning standaxd to be further
expand��. .
Th� 6ald�n Peak House Spec3.a1 DeVnlopmQnt District
appliaati.an dans not conform to i�ems 1, 2, 3, and 4 abov�.
* The GPH SDD proposal exceeds a1� zortinq standards fdr
the Commeraial. Gare I zone district, aac�rding to pl.anninq
staff ineznoranda.
* The existing building exceeds ii 2oning standards,
acoording to plattt'►ing �ta�f inemoranda.�
* The expansion of tha buildi.ng beyond zohihq standards
or an expansion of a �or�-conforming condition is a g�ant of
special privilege nat generally availab�.e to �11 property
ov�rners.
* Unfashionable a�chitetstuze or failure of the prop�L^ty
owners to prope�ly mnintail'� a building is insuff3.cie�nt �auaQ
to exceed zoninq ctandards.
Tha Sameowners Association recogniz�s that the zoning
code providss for th� right of the proper�y owr,er to replace
the �tructu.re to it present cor�fiqu�atio� should it be
destroyed. TherefoY-�, �t is r400mmended that an�r al.terat�.or►
£0'd 9SA�tZ9£0£ 1NOWli1 NI1NNtJ?Jd S3WliC
a � � •
•
M
To: Mayor Osterfoss and Va�.1 Town Coun�il Member�
F'�am: Jim Lamont, Plah�inq Consultant
Date; Oatober 18, 1993
RB: Golden Peak House ►
6pecial Development bistrict Application
Page 3
In addition to thQ fo�cgoing, the followitag aonditione
should L1� attached to any approval of thQ pxojeat.
I
e. Streetscape improvsments should be a praportio�al
amount oi� the GRFA in excess of the underlying zona to that
required of the Christiania spec�.a� Deve�.oprnent District. The
Christiania recjuirem�t w�as for- 19$ �n �xGess GRFA alYowad.
A condition of approval w�s $40,000 in lax�d,scape/streets�ape
improv�nts on public and private pxopatty.
The GPH GRFA requested, exceeds the standard by 239�.
If approved as proposed the GPH SpD should be r�quired to
pay, at $ m�nimum, �br �280,000 of new 1,ar�dscape and
stxe�tsCape improvernent�. A specifi�ad t�maut�t should k�e a
condition oE appxaval..
Streetscape fmprov'ements shou�.d nat be condition upon
the fdrn�ation of a specia�. Imprav�ement nistrict. An escrow •
lund shou�.t1 be established for the constructiert of Siebert
Cfrcle, to b� spent �hen suff3.cient funds are available trom
1'��ighboring property ownex� t►rid ather sourcQ$.
f. Acquisitfon o� Mi11 Creek stream Tract and
Space/Pirate Ship Park should be requ�.r�d in exchange for the
appending of the drip easement�opnn �paae tract ta the GPH
sfte. The Cost oi acquirinq t e par]€ should ba cradited to
the 3treetscape escrow account. The applicant should be
respon�ible for the care and m�3.ntenance o� the open
spa�e/park according td approved gtahdards.
q• Etnployee hou�inq requirements shcul,d be met either
on-site or off-site. �
' t
1i• The "Pay-in-lieu LoaBing Space Fae ahould be
required for th� absence af a z�qu�red on-site loading sp�,ce,
A mxnimum of $50,000 should be set aside in an �scrow
nCGOt12]t.
i. A Cet�tral �torage room within the buiYdirig, larg�
enough to prdvide short term fr�irjht storago for all on-�ite
use� shoul.d be required. The �toXage roora should be diract�y
e��Cessihle to a freight elevator tla�t must hav� direct and
adequste acc�s�s to the �trest.
Additional camment�, concern�, ahd recommended
eqnditio2is nay b� forthcoming, subject to further r�view of
the proposal by the Board o� birectors a»d member�hip.
,
S0'd 9SB�LZ9£0£ 1NOWk�1 NI7NNtl21d S3Wlif
'93 31�02 13a44 $ 817 72S 3383 � ; g2
,1
�
Frances E. Gunn
332 MIII Creek Circle �
Vail, Colorado 8f657
Vail Town CoUnC.�l NoVember 2r 1993
Town of vail
?5 South Frontage Road Wes�
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mayor Oet�rfoss and Tawn Counoi� M�mb�rs:
A protest ia h�reby submit�ed eoncerning the app]�iaation
rQquesting dosignation of the Gvlden Peak Hause(GPH) as a
Special Development Di�triat(&PD) .
Th�: c:reation of the Special Developm�nt District is
opposed becauge: ,
* The GPH SDD proposal exceeds all zor�ing standards �or
the Coa►mercial core I zone distriat, accordinq to planning
staff inemoranda.
* The existing building exceeds aIl zoning standards,
accordinq to planninq staff inemoranda.
k The expansion oL the buildinq beyond zoning standards
or an Fxpansion of a non-conforming condition i.s a qrant of
special privxlegc not ge�erdlly available to all property
owners.
x Untashionable architecture or �ailure of the proper�y
owners to maintain properly a building is insu��icient cause
to exceed zoning stahdards.
* The cx�ansion of the buildinq encroaches into the
Vail Village View Corr�doF.
�t is rccognized that the xoning code provides for the
right af the prvperty owner to replace the stru�ture tp �ts
present configuxation should it become destroyed. Therefare,
it ic rocommendod �hat any altoration to thc atruature be
done within the c;vnfines of the ex�.s�ing building �nvelope.
A3 a cansequence, the building w�u1�3 qualify ta� tli� z��ui�•ea
variances necessary to reconfigure the interior space and
upgrade the building exteriar.
in our judgement there i� insufficient demonstxation af
be»efat to the community and neighbarhood to justi�y the
approval of the s�ecial Dev�lapment D.�strict applicatian.
Tt�e Town council is requested ta deny the application for a
5pecial Deve�,opflteri� bist��,G� fOr the Golden Peak House.
s cerely,
� V��
r�nc� E. Cunn
. —. ... MOV-02-'93 Tl� 14:50 I A�OFF I(�h1AX #416 TEL N0:30.3-692-�''�28 #054 P01
`'�' 1�1��'/�'�''' Gr��/�'�s
�
,�y t��) l►'k.rt,l
�b ov .J'o �l o�ra�r ��
� l�e.w� CO S'����
vaii Town C�uncil Novomb4r �, 1993
Town of Vail
75 gouth Frontago Ro�►d W�st
Vnil., Colorada 81657
Dear Mayor OsterlosB and Town Cauncil Memberss •
A �rotest fa h�reby submitted aoncerning the applioation
requoating desi.gnation of the Golden Peak House(GPH) a� a
spQCial oeveiopment Distriat(SDD) .
The creation of the Specfal Dave�,opment Di�trio� �a
opposed bece�uae:
* Tha GPH SDD pr�poaall exaeed� a�l zoninq etandard6 !or
the Coaua�rafal Core I zone district� accordinq to planning
ataff mQmoranea.
t Th� existinq buiiding exoeeds a�.i zoning et�ttda�rds,
accordinq to planning etaff momoranda.
* The expans�:on oP the builc�ing beyond zoning 6tandnrda
or an expansion of a non�aonPora�inq aondition �,a a grant ot
6pecial pxivilege not genere�liy availabie to all prop�rty
awnars.
� U»fashionable arahitactura or �afiura of tha property
ownera to main'�ain proporly a building i� ir�suFfi.a�,ent aause.
to axecad 'zoning atandards.
* Th� expansion or the building encroaChes into the
V�il Villaqe V3ew Corridor. �
� It is recognia�d tht�t the �ani»g code p�ovidea Por tha
right ot the property owner ta, rapl.aa� th� atructuro to its
proaQnt configur�t�on should i� become degtroy��. Ther�fore,
it is recommenc�e8 that any elteration to the structure be
done w�.thin the con�inee o! th� existinq buiidinq envelope.
As a consequenoe� the bu�lding would qualffy for the required
variances neae�sary to recon�3gure tt�e irtterior epaca and
upgrade the building exterfor. �
In our juc�gement thare ia insuffici�nt damonstr�ttio» o�
benefit to the community and neiqhborhood to justi the
appr�val oS the Special Develvpment District applicatioll.
The Town Coun�il 1�5 requeated to deny the applieatiot� for a
SpeciAl Developmant Dist�rict for the Gold�n Psak Sou�e.
3incerely,
/` A , � , •
�
...�}, 1� 1�7r�'��i n.rz� �
C rr �� owti�r-r' 3p 3 G �� �'+rr�� �t. '�.�
��r'! , C�
. . _
• , r � � �
��1 �; .
Vail Associates, Inc.
Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver Creek�Resorts
HAND DELIVERED October 19 , 1993
Vail Town Council
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Open Space Parcel Dedication
Dear Council Members :
Vail Associates, Inc. ( "Vail Associates" ) along with the
Town of Vail and members of the Vail community, feels that the
proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House (the
"Redevelopment" ) will contribute to a positive Vail experience
for anyone enjoying the viewscape from Bridge Street looking to
Vail Mountain or from Vail Mountain looking to Bridge Street.
Therefore, in the spirit of cooperation with the Town of Vail and
for the benefit of the owners, residents and visitors in the Town
of Vail, Vail Associates, Inc. is willing to cooperate with the
Town Council in the condition imposed by the Town Council for the
approval of the Redevelopment, specifically, the Town' s request
that Vail Associates dedicate to the Town of Vail a portion of
Tract E, Vail Village Fifth Filing, encompassing an area at least
equal to the portion of Tract E which Vail Associates has
ell to Golden Peak House for the Redevelopment
(1240 square feet���. By this letter, Vail Associates agrees to
co - e�wn of Vail no later than December 31, 1993, that
portion of Tract E (comprising annroximatelY 2, 000 to 3�0
square feet) bounde bd y the centerline of Mill Creek on the east,
Hanson Ranch Road on the north, Cyranos property line on the
west, and a line which would extend from the southeast corner of
the Cyranos lot easterly to the centerline of Mill Creek on the
south, as approximately represented on the attached map (the
��Dedicated Parcel" ) .
Because we feel that the Town of Vail' s vision regarding
the uses for the Dedication Parcel is basically consistent with
vail Associates' vision, we propose that the conveyance be
subject to the following conditions :
1. That there be deed restrictions which would (i) limit the
uses of the Dedication Parcel to public pedestrian access,
Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA — (303) 476-5601
, ` r . ` • .
Vail Town Council
October 19, 1993
maintenance vehicles, utilities, drainage, recreation activities
(including but not limited to nordic and alpine skiing and
bicycling) , and signage relating to ski area operations and
mountain activities; (ii) prohibit parking on the Dedication
Parcel; (iii) prohibit the conveyance or transfer of the
Dedication Parcel to another party without the express written
consent of Vail Associates; and (iv) contain a disclaimer that
Vail Associates will not be liable for any damage to land or
improvements within the Dedication Parcel resulting from high
water of Mill Creek.
2 . That Vail Associates reserve an easement on the Dedication
Parcel for the uses set forth in Paragraph 1 (i) above.
` � That the Town require (in order to accomplish the proposed
� pedestrian/recreation access set forth in Paragraph 4 below) the
� current improvements (trash building and paved parking) be
removed from the Dedication Parcel on the earlier of the
redevelopment/remodel of the Cyranos Building or�hree vears from
the date of conveyance of the Dedication Parce .
4 . That, promptly after removal of such?trash building and
paved parking, the Town construct a av pedestrian/recreation
access from Hanson Ranch Road to the ' ycle path. We propose to
reserve the right to review and approval such plans prior to
implementation.
5 . That, if the conditions set forth in Paragraph 3 and 4 above
are not satisfied within a period of four years following the
date of conveyance to the Town of Vail, the ownership of the
Dedication Parcel will automatically revert to Vail Associates
and the Town of Vail will execute such documents as necessary to
effect and record such reversion.
6 . That, if the Town of Vail entertains and is willing to
approve any type of development which is not consistent with the
use restrictions set forth in Paragraph 1 above, the ownership of
the Dedication Parcel will automatically revert to Vail
Associates and the Town of Vail will execute such documents as
necessary to effect and record such reversion, in which event
Vail Associates will dedicate to the Town of Vail another parcel
of land within the Town of Vail limits equal in size to the
Dedication Parcel .
. .` � • �
Vail Town Council
October 19, 1993
If the provisions contained in this letter are acceptable to
the Town Council , we will be happy to proceed with the replatting
and documentation necessary to effect the conveyance of the
Dedication Parcel to the Town of Vail .
Sincerely,
VAIL� OCI ES, INC.
ri�yn�[n
Sr. Vice President
cc: Clark Willingham
I �i� • i • �
�
_`
�!y �_
: ,
,�
,
,
�" .�
,�
�, � -
- � _
� s
, � � � �
,,��
� ' ,i ��I�
� . . , . . .
� ,, :_
_
j , _
, -
,, _ �
_
'�' ' �li
i�, �� -
�������1
� i
�� � -�
�� 3 �
� ������.
�•::
� � ,,,,,,
� � .....
� �.. _ _ __ _ _ _
�� ' ,
� , , �.
,_• �_,
,��..=-- - -,
>f•:.'�s ;i
�,. . . � � • • I �
,
:� f�r • • I �
�tf
•
��.
• ' • 1 �;i t'I; . � , �
' • � 4 � ��
..
� • .
, , . , • � \ ,�, �
, ' �;:. . �� �(}. � •,,,r�i� .
1'�y � • v/ ' .
. ... : x � ' \� .
� :� � , �}� � � ` � � f � 1` .
' ' "° �' �I
� �� � d . �
. . �' „ �� . .
.,�' :
. • . .k �u,� . . � _ —_
. �, f Q��a
. ;:
: � , . . .
. , � . , �
• X . � � � . � . , .
�
� • � r
I� � �N ) �i ; � �\ � �No''
.� ,, .'� . �',�,c�,,, �_
� '' , . .,� — . .
. . - / , � : . .
; . ,.
` . �;.
, ��;�
� '� � ,,...J�--�, ,1��
� 0d� � 'j'1'� � �, ` � �
�� ;�I . � � .�i '.,'��' , .. �
i � .� ,
� ' ` 1 �
. .
, '1,, t `
•�� !�� / • i �! � • .
.. `�e.r ; f . � ' 1� , ..
�1 � �iJ � 1,►
/1✓ � .
. . :.� . ; - '.,'.yti .
d� � � ' � ' "
� . � ��.��
� .y� U � .
.,: i
� . . • .��� ' ' ' � � , ; .
. � . ��•,.
.� � Qr '� .. �1�'�'� .,�
�, . � �� �`
1}, : � ' � � ' t
. �.��'.` ��r � '
x '
. 1 . ;�,;,,�, . ,, �. .
. ,
. • . :
� :;� ,r. � � :, . .
. ' �,.. .a,� ; :� , `` . . ; .=� .
< � � �
. .� x �\ . ,� .
. �
. . �.� , �a. .
�. . . ', �`., � .� .
' : • x .
• � . .\
. . �
• . • ' :.� � �. '/.
� ' �'
• . gNV►'� ,- •� �o a °� .
. .��. ` , '�'rM"�'�� .� �yGty�' .
. � � . � . . l�"'� . . '
.i r
. � .. . • �
. �
to the bicycle path south of Cyranos. Based upon that study, VA was willing to adjust the
configuration of the "dedicaHon parcel" to a revised configuraHon calculated to be approximately
3,370 square feet. A map outlining the proposed "dedication parcel" was included as part of VA's
letter. Jim Shearer noted VA also owned the east side of Mill Creek and asked Ms. Arnold if VA
would consider a walking path on both sides. She did not think VA would object,but advised she
would need to take that back to VA management for further discussion. Tom Steinberg expressed
strong objection to an invisible line down the middle of the stream. It was suggested Ms. Arnold
contact VA during this meeting for an immediate answer, however Bob Buckley and Clark
Willingham both objected to Council asking Ms. Arnold to do that. Diana Donovan, speaking as a
member of the PEC, discussed the minutes from their last meeting, noting public benefits. She
indicated the PEC recommended the "dedication parcel" should include the entire stream path, not
just the area up to the bike path. Mr. Willingham stated VA had given triple what the PEC had
requested and felt Council was holding up the entire project for the expanded "dedication parcel."
Jim Lamont felt Mr. Willingham was receiving over and above the established GRFA and asked why
VA could not unilaterally dedicate the Mill Creek stream tract over the phone. Mayor Osterfoss
noted that TOV's and VA's goals were basically the same.
At the time of this meeting, letters of opposition to this project had been received from Barbara C.
Welles, Dolph Bridgewater, Frances E. Gunn, Foxhall A. Parker, Robert W. Galvin, Jim Lamont,
Monica G. Benderly, Sara A. Newsam, Joy Hilliard, and Konard G. Prem. The opposition to
designation of the Golden Peak House (GPH)as an SDD primarily related to its exceeding all zoning
standards for the Commercial Core I zone district, that the exisHng building exceeded all zoning
standards, that expansion of the building beyond zoning standards or an expansion of a non-
conforming condition was a grant of special privilege not generally available to all property owners,
that unfashionable architecture or failure of the property owners to maintain properly a building was
insufficient cause to exceed zoning standards,and that expansion of the building encroached into the
Vail Village View Corridor.
Lengthy discussion regarding EHUs, short-term rental program details, at-grade improvements,
proposed declarations of public access,establishment of timelines,and view corridor encroachments
led to further language changes in Section 8, items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the ordinance relating to
developer agreements with requirements which were a part of TOV's possible approval of the
establishment of SDD No. 31. Glen Healand, current lessee of Cyranos, had questions about deed
restrictions. Bill Whiteford,Cyranos Building owner,inquired about a lease with TOV regarding the
trash building on Tract E. Tom Moorhead advised that lease had been entered into under the
mistaken idea that TOV owned that land. As it did not, that lease was void. Jim Lamont was
concerned that conditions were being set before issuance of building permits and felt they should be
set at the time of issuance of building permits.
Tom Steinberg asked if there was a view corridor on Bridge Street looking south. Mike Mollica
stated that View Corridor No. 2looked toward the base of the ski mountain and chair No. 1. Rob
LeVine directed staff to redraw that view corridor. Tom Steinberg advised that the view corridor be
set up based on known elevations. Mr. Willingham did not feel amending View Corridor No. 2 was
appropriate. Tom Steinberg wanted to set up a whole new view corridor, but Mike Mollica felt
surveyors could not do that based solely on the drawings of this project. Mayor Osterfoss suggested
the amended view corridor be established simultaneously with the construction of the project. Jim
Lamont stated people were resentful of projects like the Christiania and wanted set limits. Paul
Johnston, owner of the Christiania, advised there was no adapted view corridor when his project
(Christiania) was built,and that view corridor was established after construction was complete. Mr.
Willingham admitted the GPH project would encroach on View Corridor No. 1 and added the
existing building already encroached on View Corridor No. 1,not View Corridor No.2. Merv Lapin
asked why there was wony about View Corridor encroachments when there were more and more
encroachments allowed all the time. Mr. Willingham felt that was because projects met certain
criteria in order to be permitted encroachments. Kristan Pritz felt the view corridor in this case was
improved by the new building. Bill Wilto voiced support of the project.
Jim Lamont asked what kind of signai each one of the SDDs sent. He called for responsible action
on the part of owners to maintain their buildings and was frightened that this project and the
proposed Vail Athletic Club SDD were setting harmful patterns. He read a porHon of a letter dated
November 1,1993,from Dolph Bridgewater,Jr., "The Special Development District was a sound idea
in concept, that has been ruined by excessive exploitation by development interests, and weak and
flexible review by responsible authority. Excessively large structures of the sort proposed by the Vail
Athletic Club and the Golden Peak House considered separately are seductively attractive, but
collectively they have a special malignancy all their own... each requiring the next structure to be
larger and to eliminate a little more of our view and our open space. A line of responsibility will
have to be drawn somewhere at some time. Will you please seriously consider drawing it here and
now."
After further discussion,Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993,on second
reading with Section 8,items 1,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 amended and with the entire Section 8 to read as
2 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutea 11/Z93
. - ., _ • �
� k
follows
SECTION 8
The developer,joindy and severally,agrees with the following requirements,which are a part of the
Town's approval of the establishment of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD
No. 31, GPH Part�lers, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-bedroom,
employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be a minimum
size of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance requirements and
such units shall be within the Town of Vail.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit far the redevelopment project,
the Golden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute $32,000.00 towards the redesign
and redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The$32,000 contribution towards the redevelopment of Seibert
Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a future Special Improvement
District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment project,
Vail Associates, Inc., will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open space shall
be at least an equivalent azea, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck" easements. A
portion of the Mill Creek stream tract will be dedicated to the Town of Vail as permanent open space
and the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E will be leased to the Town of Vail for the purpose of
maintaining the park. The terms of the lease are to be agreed upon by the parties.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates,Inc.shall
reserve a public pedestrian access, across Lot C, which is located between the Golden Peak House
and the Hill Building, by declaration to be recorded with the Eagle County Recorder. Such
declaration shall be permanent and only revocable upon written agreement with the Town of Vail.
The declaration of public pedestrian access shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a building
permit for the project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in a short-term rental program,at comparable market rates,at all
times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Paztners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the two accommodation units (or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market
rates,at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association,or their successors in interest,
shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s) which
may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements as set forth
in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail Transportation Master Plan,if and when
an improvement district(s) is formed.
9. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and GPH Partners,Ltd.shall
cooperate with, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any efforts by the Town of Vail to
establish additional view corridors or amendments to existing view corridors as enhanced by the
project. Such changes and addiHons shall be pursuant to the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
10. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation),and that the original ground floor plan,which does not include the
curved retail windows along the eastern portion of the building,be reviewed by the Design Review
Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11. That GPH Partners, Ltd. further articulate the first floor"retail windows",by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry
on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
13. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
In addition,Jim Gibson's motion included a new Section 9 to read as follows:
SECTION 9
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be approved
by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing in
accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which do change
the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by Town Council after the
above procedure has been followed. The Community Development Deparhnent shall determine what
constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan, and that Section 10 of the ordinance
be amended to read as follows:
3 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutee 11fL93
.� .
. " � �
SECTION 10
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3) years
from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. The
developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Municipal Code of the Town of
Vail.
Rob LeVine seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken,Tom Steinberg Eelt that due to the number of changes to the ordinance,the
ordinance should be tabled until November 16, 1993. Jim Shearer agreed and asked again if Ms.
Arnold would contact VA regarding dedication of both sides of the stream. Jim Gibson felt it was
wrong to hold the project up because of a fear of loss of leverage on that issue. Bob Buckley agreed.
Rob LeVine agreed with Bob Buckley and added he was very much in favor of the project. Merv
Lapin advised he intended to vote against the project because of the same reasons he addressed on
first reading. He felt the SDD process was being overused. It was noted the Regular Municipal
Elections were on November 16, 1993, and Council consensus was reached to review the final
ordinance language during a work session on November 9, 1993,before its publication. Jim Gibson
called the question. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-2, Tom Steinberg and Merv Lapin
opposed.
Item No. 6 was Ordinance No. 27,Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance approving a Special
Development District (known as SDD No. 30,The Vail Athletic Club) and the development plan in
accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and Setting forth details in regard thereto.
The applicant was JWT/1987 Vail Limited Partnership,aka,The Vail At1�leHc Club. Mayor Osterfoss
read the title in full. Kristan discussed changes in the ordinance since first reading,including parking
specifics,landscaping specifics,and streetscape specifics. Kristan noted that there was an issue with
the concern of an adjacent property owner in the Mountain Haus, Joan Lamb, about the dormers
impacting her view of the Gore Range. Stan Cope and Rohn Robbins would further review this issue
under discussion. Kristan also pointed out that Council had received letters of opposition from
Barbara C. Welles, Robert W. Galvin, Ronald A. Prem, Foxhall Parker, Frances E. Gunn, Joy R.
Hilliard, and Jim Lamont on behalf of the East Village Homeowners Association, Inc.
Merv Lapin asked if any resolution to Mrs. Lamb's view obstruction concern had been reached. Stan
Cope advised that, per Council's request,he had met with Rohn Robbins,Jim Morter,and architect
Michael Barclay, but during those meetings it had become apparent that there was no relatively
minor design change to alleviate the concern of Mrs. Lamb. Specifically, Mrs. Lamb was concerned
with a portion of her view of the Gore Range being blocked, and the only way not to block that
portion of the Gore was to essentially eliminate six of the dormers across the north side of the project,
effectively completely changing the project. Mr. Cope noted there had also been discussion as to
whether there was some other settlement that could be made, and, until midday the date of this
meeting, Mr. Cope advised Mrs. Lamb's answer to any settlement had been no. She had continued
to press for removal of the projecYs dormers. Then,Mr. Cope indicated,he received a financial offer
from Mrs. Lamb to remunerate her approximately $150,000. Mr. Cope said he did not have an
appropriate response to that number in order to begin any negotiation. With a model, he
demonstrated and discussed details of the building in relationship to Mrs. Lamb's unit in the
Mountain Haus. He noted Mrs. Lamb's view was not a protected view. It was not part of any view
corridor in Vail. He stated the underlying zoning would have allowed this building to have been
built in such a way that would have blocked that view at any time without an SDD. He said he had
researched where the property line was for the Mountain Haus, and it appeared that the Mountain
Haus had no setback. He discussed the affected view in Mrs. Lamb's unit and stated it was
extremely small. A picture of the potentially affected view was shown and discussed.
Mayor Osterfoss asked Kristan Pritz if,based on public accommodaHon zoning,someone could have
built a building in the location of the blocked view. Kristan said that the current building would
have had to remove GRFA to meet the zoning,but assuming that was done,the building could have
been re-built in that location. Kristan said the GRFA was being allowed to increase through the SDD
�process.
Merv Lapin asked what the requirements were for TOV to protect private individual's views. Kristan
Pritz said there was no established view corridor in the area under discussion, but she felt it was
important to look at the criteria which addressed design compatibility and sensitivity to the
immediate environment,neighborhood,and adjacent properties relative to architectural design,scale,
bulk,building height,buffer zones, identity character,visual integrity, and orientation. To her, that
criteria was important; how neighbors would be impacted needed to be considered. Kristan added
that with most SDDs, there would probably be some view blockage from some vantage point with
any project. That was inevitable with the construction, but she said staff felt, given all of the other
elements of the SDD, the project merited approval. Diana Donovan said this view concern was not
discussed in depth at PEC,but at anytime when more building occurs,someone's view would most
likely be affected,but she noted there were no private view corridors in this area. Diana felt impacts
could be minimized when possible,but there was always going to be some impact with respect to
t� Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutea 11/?/93
�. *
,' � � • ' • • �
' � + • � � � � ��,� �
- . � - , � ,
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 2, 1993
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Coiulcil was held on Tuesday,November 2,1993,in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor
Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
jim Gibson
jim Shearer
Tom Steinberg
Rob LeVine
Bob Buckley
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Larry Grafel, Acting Town Manager
Tom Moorhead,Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation of which there was none.
Itein No. 2 was approval of the minutes of the October 5, 1993, and October 19, 1993, Evening
Meetings. Merv Lapin moved to approve the minutes of the October 5, 1993,and October 19, 1993,
Evening Meetulg Minutes, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance rezoning 7.710 acres
from Agricullural and Open Space,Section 18.32 to Low Density Multi-Family,Section 18.161ocated
between Tract C, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch and Parcel B. The applicant was Town of Vail/Vail
Housing Authority. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Kristan Pritz requested tlus item be tabled
because Jen Wright, Housing Authority Chairman, was not present due to illness. Merv Lapin
moved to table Ordinance No. 21,Series of 1993,first reading,until December 7, 1993,with a second
from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the moHon passed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No.4 was Ordinance No.26,Series of 1993,second reading,an annual appropriation ordinance:
adopting a budget and financial plan and making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and
liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its fiscal year January 1, 1994, through December 31, �
1994,and providing for the levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due
for dte 1993 tax year and payable in the 1994 fiscal year. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. There
was brief discussion regarding previous years' budget formats which had included line item
definitions and the outcon�e based budgeting process. Sleve Thompson advised cost accounting
procedures would begin january 1, 1995. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 26, Series
of 1993, on second reading, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. 5 was Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance providing for the
establishment of Special Development District No.31,Golden Peak House;adopting a Development
Plan for Special Development District No.31 in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal
Code; rezoning a portion of Tract � from Agricultural and Open Space Zoning to Commercial Core
I Zoning, and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicants were Golden Peak House
Condominium Association/Vail Associales, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Mayor
Osterfoss read the title in full. Mike Mollica noted the applicants had eliminated 455 square feet of
floor area overall since first read'u�g, and he reviewed further modifications. He indicated the
changes requested Eor Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1993,on first reading, had been made for second
reading. Those changes included dctaii:i�g what each oE the four co-applicants were responsible for.
Discussion followed,particularly wilh r��ard to Section 8,item 3 of the ord'ulance related to Council's
desire for more definite language regarding the open space dedication for the Mill Creek stream tract
and/or the Pirate Slup Park area of Tract E. Bob. Buckley felt VA would have problems with a
permanent restriction on Pirate Ship Park because of new technologies and ski area operations. Gerry
Arnold, representing VA, explained VA's concept of conveying the area under discussion as a
"dedicadon parcel° to TOV,rather than permanently restricted open space area,and that dedication
would occur prior to lhe issuance of a building permit by TOV. She reviewed a letter to Council �
from VA dated November 2, 1993, regarding the proposed open space parcel dedication. In that
letter, VA stated they understood the concern of Council regarding the reconfiguration of the
"dedication parcel"and had done a preliminary study for a walking path from Hanson Ranch Road
1 Vail Town Counci!Evening Meeting Minutes 11/7/83
� �° �
� i �
z� - ���= -�� -- Z� -
1�. 1�� - 1�19 : _.�� �- ��e s,•C� /f.-,.�C - --- o -�----
�----- ---
--------------�--�---�-- O" �
J'_I_- p }��, �o -�, - 'I._��
--�-��'°��O�F ."� --- -"�-'01�� Q��--��-��`-�
Q . . • �
G. A - , — -
-- -- �.e �— =�.�--- - —_ �__��__�_
- � 1���-�'`�. �-S.�.r�.-./,�,...� - ---_ _ '__,__
,- _____ -__.
_ s - ��� ,�� ���A���_c��--�--�.� .�..�.
--��.�.�4. - v�-��� � � � � a _�-, _�_� �
� ��---
----- ----�°?�—��_.�-�1—�_��—�-�� .��_�'�'�y
�m n., / — !� �,��J� a -�- �'�a r�� �3 . _
-- —�- _ _ _ - -
� � �' ��D.S-�_��� - -_�'--�/14-_�c--�-��4 Ox`
��
�1.�°�(-- �� e-�
�`----
---�—L=__��� p.3�o�_�_ — �,�P r� �� ����7�'.__ � �/
_�__^Q. rn--�� .��,-.�,�_?(� _ .
__ '1'�� � .�� �L�Q � ��.,�_ �- � �-
-- - - �- __ _-
' �.��
�
�_ -_-�. �� �.�.m�.e�„����i��l
---- ___ _ --
/ m� f
_ ��. Z — � ------- � �o� � v��n�� � Z __ � --
----- ------- ���---�-� �-- .��---------- -
- — �--�� „-�_�Q���-�-�P ---- -----
��yr��
`�---���.r��, . � ���_r aa�a�—_
------ ----- -- n�c • - -
l - � _.
�-°`�` o� n�.w ��C�ru��.'--
� ......-..
�- . ��! _
y ' � �
. (i,��tti/• `�
�
'` -� D�2' i�-v `ti'�/l
� 3 — S �cL,.�
� � t �i �r
S
� �- �-,�`�
�
� V � ,
io
� �- �-�
�`[ _
. _
�
�
" -- Z
.
S "
,�;�. _£:�, �.�.4
. �
i � �
��
o � =z 9� t� Pl� — .�' .
—� - —
_- �'1 � ��F��4 --- 13 � �.�, D�
° - � 2 -4
Ne =
' -- 3
s /.! ` �
�
• C��2 -rr� - l�l�
c i "" � �
• - 1. 0 3
— 1 . 2�� Q --�-�.��� —
,
l� ` ' � ��� ; 70. r�o
.
-e.-��_—_ ; '___ __ --��------- --='-'- -- /, Z z �---
---------- ��'. �8�-9
�
� � . . � s �
+ 3 09
� c�:-,h,
��` 'Q!o
4� ^ = /S �
+ z �q � o
l� '7/s ��
r
� , � •
ORDINANCE NO. 28 � '� /� ? /�/5�
Series of 1993
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF
THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; REZONING A PORTION OF TRACT E FROM
AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE ZONING TO COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONING, AND
SETTING FORTH DETAfLS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS,the developer,Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. or the successors in interest, has submitted an
application for the establishment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31, which includes
a request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration, a request for a minor subdivision, and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1, for a certain parcel of property within the
Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village First
Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS, the developer has submitted an application to rezone a portion of Tract E, Vail
Village Fifth Filing, more specifically described in the attached Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and
Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone district; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediately
adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort will better reflect the actual use of the land; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is for the benefit of the community as it meets the
municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on October 11, 1993, held a public hearing on the establishment of an SDD and the
rezoning, and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial
to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to establish SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
Ordinance No.28,
1 Series of 1993
r
� + • . •
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCiL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
SECTION 2
Special Development District No. 31 is established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space,employee housing,streetscape improvements and other amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental
Commission, and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 31 is established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District
No. 31 and said 8,375 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4
The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in
Section 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all of the
requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been
fully satisfied.
SECTION 5
The Town Council hereby rezones that portion of Tract E legally described in the attached
Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone
district.
Ordinance No.28,
2 Series of 1993
� � • �
SECTION 6
The Town Council finds that the development plan for SDD. No. 31 meets each of the
standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or
demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the
development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The development plan is comprised of those
plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the following documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated October 25, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, 1993 (second floor plan}.
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated October 25, 1993 (third floor plan).
6. Sheet No. A-10, dated October 25, 1993 (fourth floor plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated October 25, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated October 25, 1993 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 7
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 6 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these
standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the
development of SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31:
A. Lot Area - The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks - The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans.
Ordinance No.28,
3 Series of 1993
� � • •
C. Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Building shall be as
indicated on the Approved Development Plans.
D. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not
exceed 18,715 square feet. This figure includes 2,847 square feet of excess common area that
has been included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes
fourteen (14) dwelling units and two (2) accommodation units, for a total of fifteen (15) dwelling
units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94% of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plans.
F. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved
Development Plans.
G. Parking -As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all properties located within the Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by GPH Partners,
Ltd. paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The required number of parking spaces, in
accordance with the Approved Development Plan for SDD No. 31, shall be a total of 13.794
parking spaces. Payment into the parking fund shall occur at the time of Building Permit,
according to Section 18.52.160(B,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 8
The developer, jointly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are
a part of the Town's approval of the establishment of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD
No. 31, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-
bedroom, employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be
a minimum size of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance
requirements� ct,�-r,( � .c�,-.�.L� a�a� � '"''��'-- '� ��U�
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment
project, the Golden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute$32,000.00 towards
the redesign and redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards the
redevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a
Ordinance No.28,
4 Series ot 1993
' , • •
future Special Improvement District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project, Vail Associates, Inc., will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open
space shall be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck"
easements. It was suggested by the PEC that the Mill Creek stream tract and/or the Pirate Ship
Park area of Tract E be dedicated as permanent open space.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates,
Inc. dedicate to the Town of Vail, a public pedestrian easement, across Lot C, which is located
between the Golden Peak House and the Hill Building. The dedication of the easement shall
occur prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
�
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in short-term rental program, at all
times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
0.
building (or equivalent), to be included in short-term rental program, at
all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the two accommodation units (or
o`
equivalent) in the building, to be included in- short-term rental program,
at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association, or their successors
in interest, shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement
district(s) which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing
improvements as set forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail
Transportation Master Plan, if and when an improvement district(s) is formed.
9. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include
the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design
Review Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
10. That GPH Partners, Ltd.further articulate the first floor"retail windows", by adding
Ordinance No.28,
5 Series of 1993
� •
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
11. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry
on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
12. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 9
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may
be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public
hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments
which do change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by
Town Council after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development
Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
SECTION 10� �� �Q , 1 Z � T�"'P �
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three
(3) years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. If the developer does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the Special
Development District or any stage of the Special Development District, the developer shall
recommend to the Town Council that either the approval of the Special Development District be
extended, that the approval of the Special Development District be revoked, or that the Special
Development District be amended. �,�e ��� ���� � �
'� �P �dZw— ��,
SECTION 11
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
and the Town Counc;l hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 12
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
Ordinance No.28,
6 Series oi 1993
� �
SECTION 13
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed
and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1993. A public hearing on this
ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
on the day of , 1993, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TtTLE ONLY) THIS DAY OF , 1993.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
Ordinance No.28,
7 Series of 1993
.>, . . . ,
, , ' ' � �
EXHIBIT A � �
PRQP��TY I7ESCRIP�'7C�N
���� �� f record dl in �he �o�ice � the F�gle�Couri�yd�Colorado@
a�►p ther�a
Gl�rk aad R�corder, � de�cr�.bed ae �ol].ows�
Ca�noi�g a►t th� NWS/16 cozner Qf Section 8, Township 5 �o�tth�
Re�nqc 8G Wcvt og the Six�h pr3ncipal Meridian, gt��-d poittt a18o
b�ing the northwe�ter�.y co�ex af said �rac� 8; thance, a�.ong the
no�thorly line o� aa�.d T��c� �, N�9°44 'Ob"E 9.OQ tC�e� to the �"rue
Paint at 8egir�n�n�t �hence, cantinuing alonq said t�ortharl� ].ine,
N89•44' Op"E �.04 faat to tho �cauthwagter�.y �ornc�r o� Golden �eak
gouse {A Ca�►dvm�.n�.u� Pro�ec�.) acGOxding to the map thexeof reaord�d
in the otsice vt i:Iae Eagl.a County, �aZoacado, CJ,erk gnci Recorder;
th�nce the fo],l.owing twa courseg aZong the co�on l�.ne o� sai3
Tt�►Ct E exid �!li�Z Gois�c� Peak 8au�cs {1� �89°�i4' 08"E B4.OQ te$�.' (2)
N55•45' Oa"E �2.50 �ee� to the sou�heast�rly �o�n�r of $aid GoZden
peaJc Sona�3 themG�, degarting snid co�aan 7.iz�ar S30°�5� OQ"E 6.00
�eetf thettaa S59'45'04"W 52.50 �ee�� �heuce S31u42' �5"W 5.66 fethe
thenae S89'44'o0"�T 9�..oo ��et th� �
T�ue Point o� Hegi�nning, n a�ning I.240 gquare �eetr more Q� 7.e�
De,t@:�1,��._ -' ��
, Stan Hog� '
Colvrado P.�.S. 26598
r�viaed �srt Q� tract e �o �o1d��a peak house
,
� � �
�
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1993
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
7:35 P.M. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the October 5, 1993, and October 19,
1993, Evening Meeting Minutes.
7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance
Andy Knudtsen rezoning 7.710 acres from Agricultural and Open Space, Section
18.32 to Low Density Multi-Family, Section 18.16 located between
Tract C, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch and Parcet B. Applicant: Town
of VailNail Housing Authority.
Action Repuested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
21, Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backqround Rationale: Please see background and analysis of
criteria in the staff memorandum dated 10/11/93. On 10/11/93, the
PEC recommended to approve (7-0) the requested rezoning with
the conditions as outlined in the staff cover memo dated 11/2/93.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 21, Series of
1993, on first reading.
8:25 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1993, second reading, an annual
Steve Thompson appropriation ordinance: adopting a budget and financial plan and
making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of
the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its fiscal year January 1, 1994,
through December 31, 1994, and providing for the levy assessment
and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1993
tax year and payable in the 1994 fiscal year.
Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
26, Series of 1993, on second reading.
8:30 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance
Mike Mollica providing for the establishment of Special Development District No.
31, Golden Peak House; adopting a Development Plan for Special
Development District No. 31 in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of
the Vail Municipal Code; rezoning a portion of Tract E from
Agricutturat and Open Space Zoning to Commercial Core I Zoning,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicants: Golden
Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates, Inc./GPH
Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Action ReQUested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
28, Series of 1993, on second reading.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of
1
� � w
,
1993, on second reading.
9:00 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance
Shelly Mello approving a Special Development District (known as SDD No. 30,
The Vail Athletic Club) and the development plan in accordance
with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and Setting forth
details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
27, Series of 1993, on second reading.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 27, Series of
1993, on second reading.
10:00 P.M. 7. Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance
Larry Grafel granting a franchise by the Town of Vail to Public Service Company
Tom Moorhead of Colorado, its successors and assigns,the right to furnish,sell and
Ron Carpenter distribute gas to the Town and to all persons, businesses, and
Phil Noll industry within the Town and the right to acquire, construct, install,
locate, maintain, operate and extend into, within and through said
Town all facilities reasonably necessary to furnish, sell and
distribute gas within the Town and the right to make reasonable use
of all streets and other public places and public easements as
herein defined as may be necessary; and fixing the terms and
conditions thereof.
Action Requested of Council: Review and discuss Franchise
Agreement and approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 29, Series of
1993, on first reading.
Backqround Rationale: The Franchise Agreement is needed in
order to maintain sufficient gas service for the Town of Vail. (Note:
Second reading of this ordinance will be on December 7, 1993.)
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 29, Series of
1993, on first reading.
10:45 P.M. 8. Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance
Greg Hall dedicating a public, non-exclusive right-of-way in and upon Tract A,
Tom Moorhead Vail Village 8th Filing.
Action Requested of Council: Grant an easement for utility
purposes along Vail Valley Drive.
Backqround Rationale: There is a need to maintain sufficient
access to construct, maintain, and service utility facilities.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 30, Series of
1993, on first reading.
11:00 P.M. 9. Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance to
Tom Moorhead amend Section 18.57.060 B 13 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail.
Action Repuested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
31, Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backqround Rationale: This ordinance will correct a typographical
error in Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1992.
2
i► . • •
�
j � :
Z 3 � �`/�
. � � � l
� 1 �� --__._. .
\ . � ���--�� .
\ � �\�,��\ID� � 11 �
\ ;��� �.� � _ a��
� ��\ � �' �:��
I
1 r� 'h6��, �� �� 3i� :�'
�a� ��
� I� \��\ � � � � � �� �.
�` ,_:
� tl \a @ r � p•
1 . ��� ' . " .
� . ' ~ �\- ,%�/�
1 �si\� � ��p� � e ' i
— `�/' `�_\i� \ Xl3 ya �\ � /F�3 �/2 � �.
_ __ "\_1� _ (����:I � ` �
�
� -�.., �
\\11T11.!{�'F�G�Lr1N:� . . �/ \
� d - �"�I\ �` �
— T— \� _ � - •f t �
�� r .. _ -�__'_ -�. _ �Y \
��• � � Y
. � g\\�Q '�� '� �i ��`�� � L'
/ :
� � �8� �� f� I .
r _J �� ��� s ��� �� � C
, . �z� . � ���
� 4 � � c�a �-F S .
� 3 � '>.� � t n
g' � i �� ` i�� �^� �� ` ,
� '� �� �� � � m �- �� � '".
\ J t ° - �` � '� "^;�
' `�1�=.. � ' � ' `, � `ti
�— � �—� �" r y �_� � S'°� `y, {� r° '�
` �:
,i R;�,i � �_ �
" � y=' R ���� j� 1 � �•=;O; � � �pp;r
� �
"��T � I 'arI �� ���� �' ' � �y �a� � � z��
� � � ' ; ��- ��� � z'�
-�--�C \ , � �� \�,• , .,
\ \� �� 1 I , j � ' �
;
�� ��\ �\ .� $ � � - �+ , j:.
1 � \ I , ,�i�
/ �� �` a ���;�, /:
� �� \ t � r.i+5� . � . K'.
< < � �
�� '"""" � . ..� �, � � �;
_`� � � 7� � \ �' \\ � K.
� �
1�3����/�\�\ � z � p ��t �g � �
�� ��� `�� '� �����: . ;� �
o; � \ � \ ,� i �,
. . \ � \ \ �� �� �'� ��
\ �.
Lsi � y � T ; � \ �. .•
� 5 /,\ \
�; a
€2� m 0 � ' � ,� �
6. � � .� �
g°� � a �� ,
�z � - z � �g .
� � ,
" �" �
� ; � �
; � 6 ���
.i • ��
. �L
F �� .
.�°"""' °,02� GOLDEN PEAK_HOUSE REMODEL �"°"°"~°"°°""'"°'"M'
D o.� ioizsrea . :�°.. '�
'+ . VAIL � .COLORADO
� � �
/ � .
� .�.,�
r--���
�' �', __ \
� �
�, � ,
; ;. l
I � p I
� •
� ' 1 �
o�
I '
` I I�
tl ��{
i r' 'x! u
� t. � ��
_ r- ; z t ��j{
� # t�ae
� �' 1
� -
� : •
�a � _ � ■ �,. � ,
� � � �
� .Z � \
i �
, i � ,_ \•'\
. _
o ,� ,
. � . �
i �V �..
I • w � \
a � �• - r •
, �, �1 �� �
� � .
�,= t ,
�2i � y � .\
]L� V- , � � \��\
� i! . a• ��i ; e �'
,4; �� � • r..
��� �' �� • .
�!, �o t�
�'��'; ;. ; . /
, ��
<\ ;a; j�
:G;'' '�`i
, '' .v j.
� y \
• �
� �
m '
� Z
o '�
_ ,9 �-
� r �
D
Z
�,
I
�u �
.m w+o. 9 7 C? ' Sna.aon u�e'wv�r.�eww�
G�LDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �,�„�,,,, ma,�,
� or 10l2i;9� "`�'� i6i
VAlL � COLORADO
� � .
• •
/\ .'`
. �f \
, ii � .
.`I I f�>.
� ?
I � I
�� ° �
Y �
1 � ' �
�
����w��������aa���� �
• ' I
�. � 1
M � • I
I �c o
i •
r
• �
J;
'� ' `\\\
n `
. �
��� \��
� •.\� • 0 4
° 4 \.
I � � P \ � �
6
. w.
!!. �i�
9 R.. �� �'�
� i tt
�
O
� �
O� ` \
� C `\
_ v
,- �
•o.
. o �- .
a .
�
r.
>�
z
� -�7
. �
b°w'°' °,oZ . GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �'���"""�"°
�� � ioizsioa .,��a.. s:w,
'~� _ VAIL.�. COLORADQ:
�
� � .
. . � , �
/^� .
.� .���
- - � , � -
r J =-- \
.I i. �i s O i.r-� \
� 3 �_ :+_ �
� .s
'
o � C II1 �
o � �
'- i o
,i �.. // i L � .
S r m ;� I�
—?— = s 7c - I
I > = r �i ���I .
^ � .'
. � 3 i 'i � :r— '
� s
�— ■ °o � ��� i
� —___� � �
f� � �. • �� e �\
. e
_,� ',
i� �- � ° � c v .��i;ij�'T
i . i
� I iC. t �
� �� � �
. �_; , , .
� i :�\
' � ��.
� ,
r- � ,o ,��
� I j . �
i / ` �_
� r� � ' � _ \ � / ���
;� ,i � o � Q� � � - � �
.��i.: � � � ��s
� .� » /'
�
�'
� � »
\ \ �f •..
R �
'� �
� ~
O
,\�� F. !._;w
`\\ "'
�\
\
\
� �\`
� m � � ���`
� �\`
:O . � `
1 Z
v
o r •\ _.
. � v
O �
�
v '
Ir � .
>
Z
e� �
. ,�
►
��- 170Z GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE f�EMODEL s"°'°°""°"°°'""'"m`""'
a � . . ��°� .,�
� � . ,a�zs,o3 -
VAIL , �COLORAQO
� �
• �
. / �./� '
— �
..; �__ _-_
. ____= s�—- �
�� l
. � h+
��
. i � .
I�� '1 � �^I';I I
II �,
_ �4', � �, .*�
0
,� K' i, _ .
�.4.:
. - I'• I��� _ .��-I \ � ��\
� '� . �f:Y ..�.\\
�
•� , � �'•\
� y.
O'
I.M.� ' � .��
�� .�;: '•4 �
� ��_. ��� � `\
. I ` �"�1��" ,tF.; �; %
I` �
� � - ,..:
. \ ` • � /
,,:x �
s
\`�.. . R;. '
\ � ��'� .
\ . :�° �
� �� � �
•`� ��
i �� ; .
\� y
•
• �T' `, \��\ I�,1�� .
7 `�
d � `1 ``\
v �
: � \/ - '
. o ��
�o '
. �
r �
>
z
�
•
'°""�' °1Oj GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL � �'°'°°"�"°°`"""d"�
> � 10/25/93 . __ ���� '°`m'
�0- VAIL � COLORADO _ � _- �� � �
� � �
.�
./ �.. �..
�--��_�%:;_�,
� �� - -------�,:
�� ,
I;I i '�� i � i:
��� Q ° i: i
Y.
-— � lii'�;' � • , i 'i I
,�,��, i�� � .
1 I � � '
Ipli'�,, .y I, i ,
N� S
. ,� h �
I� -
i �
I � \� I�
� �_s,
i ,� ��
' � � \.. �
�- �i ,,� � �� \� •\, \ .
i� � �
, .
!� ' �E� \
�l. ' - :�� �� �
.,� � �
,
. �� ,
;
�� � :�
.,
,
�� '�'�
,
� , �.
� � ��.
. � �� --,
: � ,
a Z ,�, '�
�' �t
o p �.
� O , _
�
'D
r
D
2
e C�/1
0
�oe rawo�r 9102 I src.mn.na novtv�•�uvv�ca I
n GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL ��a., a�•
o � '��ZS��� VAIL � COLORADO , , �
. yt ' • .
./ � .
� � �
1-..�� �,
. �- -----,
... � J �_____
� � :
. i i •
�
�
�
� �
�
�
� I '
I
I
I
I � � ♦\ .� .
I �
I �
� i� � \. \
\\
�`. _ � ''•\
� o \L
.�\"`. \. - -f \\ �.
�:�'�, � O c �, �
�: � � ,
\ ' 'y
' ' /\ �/
\��� �r .� / \ /
� \r �
\\,\ � r
• \'�'�
\ , O. �
'.� � -.
/. /
\ T \\ � � `
r Z \; // '
i
{ T \ �i .
- r
o p
. � �..
. �
r
a •
z
0
�
N
J
�
. A �.�,�. 9,oz GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL S°'°°"�°"°°"""°�"'
J or 10/25/G3 � . ��a w aa►s�
-+ VAIL � COLORADO
� � - .
�
..-. �../ .,\
� T-------1,
�
i .ti_____ `
I • _ �
I :
I '
�
�
I - s �� I
+'�2 ��-
e•s rsY
� . F7,
. c
:t;;��`� \,�
I . �� �����'��
. ��R• ��
� , \ r .
. // � \ _
_ \ �
i <: �..
: t
;�� �i-- � �
� i� �. \\
� �� ��--
'� � � � ;a
� � � \
I 4�� � �
� ., \l ,� �>� �
:. \� :d ` c
\I a,� ssi�\
• ' 1 ' � I . � Ls
�,< t � .
� ,
`�\ ' �� ,.�,
. ;� � �.://
•�
\�� `.� 1
\ � j
�Y �� 1
°e
� `• j
♦ j��
\ �
a �i-�•
� . �' r
\ � � , .•
a O � �
�
� �
� a
, Z �..
o �('[��
N /—\�\\\�
J �Ca'/ ,
•
a� �°'""°' °'� �GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL ��,"°°`""'a'�
J ar iD/25/G3 � � `�° "O
►� - VAIL � COLORADO .
. �;. i � �
. � � _
. � I � i
fi— � � I _
� i. �� -
�— � � � , — .
- �.
� � i — ,: .
' I � +
I �- e _ ' �' � � ! �
,
j �� . j ' . .
' � � �, ' i � +. _ .
� � . ; , I � �
o i _ '�'.. = o; � ,J .
� "
� � ± � � 'I� � : ;z
�� � m: . � ��
r - +'iak1�4 � r' ��� ' — .
m I m� --_
� '
< 4� °., �� I '
D ' �� � 1 I � _ { i � �i
� �
" �� Z � ����.�r� 01 �J i � � �
zJ � � ��� = "� �' �� 'F '• I 1 — 1
; � • ;� �� ��Fr ` � " ;.:,
. � - �����. Ei e � �ti II r 1
�— �i, —i � !Ik;ll? . �--�' � - , -
�— � � � � ` .
+. i »� i i
r �
� I
. �a�_ �I .
�} '–� • .
, . . s�--" §,
�/ , •
fimmr= �
,�������
�,�� _ �� •
"� i
. I : . .. ,r4 _ �'�'
'm >� j � _ �i' ,
y -� . �' I =_— - ' .
�, {-- ' ��. � m• i , .• - � 'i �
.< � � � �• � _� :
�' i o i —_ �
z ' _ _�� � I -�
! _ . � . � � �
_ I � ; � �
: i 1 • � � =�
, ;- ,� _-��. : �___ . _--_ , "
° ; i : � : . . : �--- '
�___ � .
� ' __ _ �,� � i �. .. � � � -_
�--T �� , �
�--- �. ��� •
,,
= i
a "°""°' °10� _ GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL� . � s"°"°°""°"°"'"'"�""°
.y or� 10/2bl93 • • ' . . �� aA�
� ' .°.i�..e no �
w _- .VAIL. � COLORAQQ •
� a�
� Q
� a� .
�
� �4
� ��
._.1_-. . �'! .�
� �� ��
. �I �,
. p �
Cr 'G N '
m : : = i � , :
o � s � � I� :' (
,� �a� o . . i . . _
• R � � W �i
O • Iz `' _. o o. / � Q �^Q
� 'y' � � .M:. � .. -� Q�� `" - -- �o I
S o I g p i�, �e : ; � a.I
� '�' :L .T.: .�_: ..
C N � -� j` K �s
�D C � _ �N �•� I .
] �' �
z 6 N N Y •. • � 7 : ��I � •
� ^. ' � \
.. = wy � ^!. ^t. r � ^ r :��: '� '
O Oy • \\ � O� t � .
� C I - : � - � ,�, . �
! tn ., i t o ,� � �
` m � „ \ R' ,6; � .�
, _ � � - . : �•
a �'
��� .I � I � I `J' �J � I
Jy I /i I � �� � �� � ��
I ! � � � �� � � I
�� . . .-�. � -1 �_�-
�ftR�� � �� ��
F �
� � � 3
� y
. _ Z{ �
J
E `
� �'
�� .`
Y
�, a�'I III Ii l - - ' � ,€
,;� � t 3�
��--- ---� --- -----z � :
� �
�
m p � ' ? N—
o '� .�� � ~� •�: � �� - -�
` r � ❑ � I
Z : . � , D --- i
S . , oI K , � .� � � �
c .� o �_ ' � � �f
8 � � �M
rt1 t�: I � i ' = r,. I�r,°�i • ,
� � r_. 9 p
' 2� �:i .'. � , r 'u�� .�: ��' I . �.l
�' � _ O R �'� �� I�'-; r
; � �� o �o. � � � Lq � v:. : �.
;Im I o o u . �\ - D -a= , �-� �
z m � � � 1
I
C�D I p Q �
,I� � - _� � / i ,I w� � .
• � ,j I .
I y I ----I----51"'�'°'t'-°- I i - �1 �
"��i
' I '- - - � --J � .
I ' �� �f � �� ��
I Q � � �
e : �
�
n �°""�" 902 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL � �°°��°��•^�°
, K� �- ��
.,,,�. oe. 70/25I93 ' . ._
�a � VAlL � COLORADO _ .______ . . _.
� , , , � �
,
� i
�
�N '
I
\� _ � ,
�
� �
� ` ,
�
4
s I
. (
I
�
O � i
/�� � -Y- - �
� r_�--- .-T ,,� --`�s � � _ �et-
Z �.._.
� _ +s���-- L ���N�„G �sT �
O i i � 2g •�; I
� � � �
� Y �, i
i - -s ~— ��� � .
� .I ° � � � � �-1 ;�� i
� � O� �,� ?;�a I
i �� � � t� � _^`� .
�
� � �� � �
o �� '� � � L__L—_--sz s�
1 I F; Y ' ���z�.. ����� �� � o�
; I � �,-;E� :�a �-s � i�
� i �a � - r`�� ���. {�3� '\ ��`\ ?i
C
S � 1 1 i
I � \ ~\qqqy�c�� � �.�\`\ a Z '.
I . ' \\ C�.. . . �•`\\ �
� 4 � �,
, � � �•� ` �� _ `�� �
� � ���• �:� • i
\ � , `�� �-. ?
,> -'
, � , � �, ' �
.�� c .
� .� .
. . � � �,
��\ . , .
� ` � �
, r
� ,
\ � �
/ ��
% , \ � �
(, \ �� � , �
y. �
i.
- m j
� v � .
� D \ �
� Zw �
e �ui Q �
I
. C L, � i
1�
Z
�
N
S
D
G
m
D
Z
D �
r
�
N
y
I n '°°"°'°" 902 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL s^°-°°^�^°�•�
� � o.. .�o�ssro3 ' :�°' '"':" �
i � VAIL.� COLORADO i
��
�"*���� --�f
_!!'i==�l,��i
•,`� _Kl����.
,��, �=�.h-_J3�• _ � � �
� "" -- � " 1 .r
�I ~� ��__ _'• ���, �] �_ �,1.
���' �■. 11��) h �.;, _� __ .� •
��E� �..��:��� �,d �� �:
�-- _ ���I_
-- �. ; � .
r �_=�. �.-- `� ' � �� -t
�r���L �_II►°N� ! �.� -�
. �` � ��.� !';�{� ; i ��--
■ � s.�i i � 1�1
� ^� ~�' :�I�' a�• =���� �
� �1� I-!� ��;" ;��i .~�' ��.
�■ ��i »i '�4 'ea� n ��_ �`
�� =�' I� �i' '.i';j� _�I^� �i
� -_ � ,��r�a :�f=�l� ��IJa11�' �
��i� �:OD=.Si $� _ • — ��a =��
��� ��: j��\'�j�■ � � ��'.���.,I,�
�/��I� !. �Ni/' �___�_ .�1=� � l
� �.z o � _�� � �
' IL�J ��_ � ,,� ' • �— ;�_ ��.
- _ _ ; � c� �� :E� �
, �I�� �■ (�� � � , .�_, ������,��_----__-�
I - 'l-. •���'�-
' �t� �■ �.�I ��:` � ♦ ' � �i� �- E'�►
� �� I��E � �
�.. =■ �_ ��' �,� �-�- _- �
. *� ( — — r-= �-- � ���
~ =� _�i � � � 1=� �� �sl
��� .■i ,_ . � _ ��I(��I� ��JI
:��;�-,,.+ �.: J�� �_-� �� ��,
� ��l � �E��T�P�`���
�!�� (�J ��_ �►���
- �_ ��. �
h� 1��1 ���' "r J
�
- - �J I�� ����j
� �_ -- .•�,t
— - - —�s��
�. _ . t�3a-
!�= � (�� �:i
�.�► ���
=
��,
�_ �
I�>a�.�� f.� �1 �.
i , ��Ql�y �
ni•' _'� �� ` ��'
_� -�� � - • � '
, ■ -��- `�`�.�1.
�
�: - �
r .. � �
'■�' 4
■ � ~ -��
� '� .�`�..� �� -1�•
� �� -
� ��I y� ���
�=�i'���~ _ � 1
I��',g� �� iii
W�2 "'
IE j� "� __�.
� • . • .
�
• � - • . •
�
r
• � • � �
�o� �9•93 �o�� �.�-,� fi��
• . .
-- ' — �- - ----��'-�- ------------------ --------
---���-- -�ec�e� ��c�o�►z= -,a4�L-- �-
. .
-------- -- - �-- --�-�-�--���---.i ���----
-----
,�� s �
--- - � __ _--- - ---- ----__---- - -------- ------ -- -
------ _ _____ _ ------------------------- --- _ '�v, � �.- �ae �---�.
��---���--�---��_��_6�_�___�.
,
- ----- ' � � ___ � - ���.�� , 5 �
_�_ ,----, - -------.
-------- ------ — --------------------- - ---
� ---___----------
. la ���,.-P -
-- —�---�---- _ --� _ _�. . _
• s �w= -� - --_----�. _ �_-�----�-..�.. _-----
2�� � -- - �-- -- ' -----------------------
_ , � / �
���e,w �-� ��p�._������=-- -���'��-�_-�--- _--
�n''^ __���r � � . � � _
.
— ---� $ -- ------- --------- ----__ ------------- —
. il ii
, .- �",� '�
' _ �E.g�N �-2'--l.1.� �— �
- - - �--
�.fi�mav-. � r1' � � ��/,, �
--- --�-C--- Y.__ __-- ---- -_- - --__ _ __ _ ____-- _ ____ � :
� --
• - - _ C'�-����-�_-__e_� --�-- ����-t __
_ _ _ __ ___— _ _- -- __ .
_____ __- _ ____' —� --��,� .
.
-- --�- _ --�-��---��------------- -----
fei ----=- - .r�z -��e�- � --�- �------ U
� ,
-
��o�.� ..� o ' �llc�.
� -- --- -- -- -,-� --�--�—�
------- -- __ __ -
-7---�---���-� -�--� -
, �
- --;
, �
�
' - ' �► �
. �
�1,�.- - Ns-�` �..e .� .� , �°�
��. o,�_� 7 —
•_,,� ? �v
,.
_-
(
• r ' ����
_ ----�ta�t�a�� �Q---Q .. —
l tw� s, —►
f
i,
a�
� �_ , � i ', ,�
i
• w 2
.
� ,
- --- ' --
— l�L►Z��1r. -� / 'I dVf- �r-.� D�j n�/�✓� �2� /f �YF.a�.rr
��
_ ��
• - � - � 2 �� ,
• s -
e : - �. � -
�:
y� �
. - � � • .� � �
. � , � �P �
��
provision be left in to assure an "A" bond rating and to help avoid any need for TOV to have to
purchase bond insurance coverage,the approximate cost of which was estimated at$110,000. It was
noted the need for other sales tax revenue was a remote possibility,and Merv Lapin indicated TOV
might still have to buy the insurance anyway. Steve Thompson confirmed that. Caroline Tremblay
stated the Vail Valley Performance and Conference Center Steering Committee recommended
approval of this ordinance as presented on second reading at this meeting. After brief discussion
regarding the possibility of a revenue stream shortfall,Rob LeVine moved to approve Ordinance No.
22, Series of 1993, with the deletion of the final sentence of the proposed ballot question indicating
that if additional bond coverage was required, other sales tax revenue could be pledged as
determined by Town Council. Merv Lapin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously, CrO.
Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and
reenacting Section 3.40.170 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail deleting the definition of
"charitable." Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No.
24, Series of 1993, on second reading, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the
motion passed unanimously, 6-0.
Item No. 4 was Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1993, first reading, an annual appropriation ordinance:
adopting a budget and financial plan and making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and
liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its fiscal year January 1, 1994, through December 31,
1994, and providing for the levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem property ta�ces due
for the 1993 tax year and payable in the 1994 fiscal year. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Jim
Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 26,Series of 1993,on first reading,with a second from Bob
Buckley. Before a vote was taken, Steve Thompson reviewed the funds within the ordinance that
were different from in the past, including the Parking Structure Fund, the Vail Housing Fund, and
noted the mill levy decrease from 6.35 to 6.19. He noted that 18% growth in assessed valuation
would generate more revenue than TOV could keep under Amendment 1. It was noted mill levies
could no longer be increased without going to a vote. Steve aLso noted the Enterprise Fund was
exempted under Amendment 1. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0.
Item No. 5 was Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance establishing Special
Development District No. 31 (Golden Peak House) and providing for a development plan and its
contents; development standards; and other special provisions; and setting forth details in regard
thereto. The applicants were Golden Peak House Condominium Associarion/Vail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Mike Mollica
reviewed the applicants' requests to accomplish the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak
House as detailed in the Community Development Department's (CDD) memo to the Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC) dated October 11, 1993. The five requests included a request for
the establishment of a Special Development District (SDD),a request for a Commercia Core I (CCI)
exterior alteration, a request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1, a request to rezone a
portion of Tract E from Agricultural and Open Space to CCI, and a request for a minor subdivision
involving the inclusion of the rezoned Tract E parcel into the Golden Peak House (GPH)parcel,and
the inclusion of a partion of Lot C into the GPH parcel. Mike also reviewed the twelve
understandings as detailed in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, which the developer
agreed to as a part of TOV's approval of the establishment of SDD No. 31. This included the details
of the restriction of employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance, streetscape
improvements including the applicant's contribution of $32,000 toward the redesign and
redevelopment of Seibert Circle, permanent dedication of open space to TOV by co-applicant, Vail
Associates, Inc. (VA), dedication of a public pedestrian easement across Lot C, located between the
GPH and the Hill Building, to TOV by the developer, deed restrictions on two three-bedroom
dwelling units to be included in the GPH short-term rental program at all times when they were not
occupied by the owners or guests and, in addition, the developer would agree to restrict the
remaining two lock-offs in the building as well as the two accommodation units in the building,also
at times when they were not occupied by the owner or his guests. Mayor Osterfoss asked for more
information about that restriction as it was different wording than usually seen by the TOV. Mike
advised the standard wording normally used was in the Subdivision Regulations which essentially
allowed an owner to use his unit only twenty-eight days during peak ski season and also stated it
could not be used as a permanent residence, it could not be lived in longer than six months. Mike
noted Clark Willingham, the developer, was proposing that these units be placed in the short-term
rental program for the GPH whenever they were not used by the owner or his guests. Mike
observed that left it fairly open as there were no assurances about the duration of time an owner
would occupy these units. He acknowledged that was a deviation from what had been done in the
past. Mike continued review of the remaining understandings in Section 8 including language
regarding the possibility of a future improvement district for streetscape improvements and/or the
implementation of the Transportation Master Plan,and language Mike referred to as direction to the
Design Review Board (DRB) with regard to certain exterior elements on the building, including the
understanding that the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building was acceptable to the PEC. He
pointed out that Section 9 of the ordinance included the PEC's action,as well as the recommendation
of staff, that the retractable enclosure over the outdoor dining deck not be a part of the project. He
2 Vail Town Council Evening Mceting Minutes 10/79/93
�
. �./, � .
added that a letter of protest against the application requesting designation of the GPH as an SDD
dated October 18,1993,had been submitted earlier today by Jim Lamont on behalf of the East Village
Homeowners Association, Inc.
Mr.Willingham felt the main controversy was over whether or not there should be a deck enclosure
of some sort and discussed the details of a proposed compromise. This was followed by Council
discussion regarding the size of the deck enclosure.
Drawings of the GPH project were displayed. Mr. Willingham reviewed desired changes in their
proposal and related those changes to the changes and understandings listed in Section 8 of
Ordinance No.28,Series of 1993. He was particularly concerned with the language of SecHon 8,Item
3,regarding the minimum area of open space designated to be dedicated to TOV. Mayor Osterfoss
advised the proposed clarifications could be worked out with staff between now and second reading.
She indicated if the SDD concept was to be supported, there needed to be reassurance that there
would be some major contribuiions coming back to the community in terms of permanent open
space. Tom Steinberg felt an appraisal of the CCI square footage versus an appraisal of the open
space should be conducted,and felt TOV might end up with all of Tract E. Mr.Willingham said the
land VA was proposing to give TOV was appro�cimately 3,000 square feet. Gerry Arnold,
representing VA, read in full a letter dated October 19, 1993, signed by Chris Ryman, Senior Vice
President, VA, regarding the open space parcel dedication proposal. By that letter, VA agreed to
convey to TOV no later than December 31, 1993, that portion of Tract E (comprising approximately
2,000 to 3,000 square feet) bounded by the centerline of Mill Creek on the east, Hanson Ranch Road
on the north, Cyranos property line on the west, and a line which would extend from the southeast
corner of the Cyranos lot easterly to the centerline of Mill Creek on the south, as approximately
represented on a map attached to that letter. The letter stated that because VA felt that TOV's vision
regarding uses for the above described land were basically consistent with VA's vision, they
proposed the conveyance of the land,subject to six conditions detailed in that letter. After discussion
regarding those conditions, Ms. Arnold stated she would take Council's suggestions, including the
request that the land dedication include land south to the bike path and that there be a permanent
easement or lease for Pirate Ship Park,back to VA management for review. Mayor Osterfoss advised
that Tom Moorhead also needed to review the proposal.
Mr. Willingham continued discussion about proposed changes and clarifications for the balance of
Section 8 of the ordinance. He proposed to either delete Item 9 of Section 8 altogether since their
new plans would include a modified deck enclosure, or to amend Item 9 to read, 'The Town
Council's approval for the establishment of SDD No. 31 includes the developer's request to enclose
approximately 200 square feet of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck on the south side of the
building by the use of a ReKord glass door system." Further comment included expression of
concerns about that request. Kristan Pritz was directed to informally discuss this issue further with
the PEC members before second reading. Tom Steinberg suggested the developer be required to pay
into a loading dock fund. Mike Mollica noted that the specific language in Item 8 of Section 8 of the
ordinance included the Streetscape Plan improvements and the Transportation Plan improvements.
Mayor Osterfoss asked Mike Mollica to review what criteria the PEC used to recommend approval
of this ordinance. Mike stated the SDD was the most important aspect of this. He noted the SDD
was an overlay zone district which allowed TOV and property owners flexibility with regard to the
development standards. It also allowed TOV to weigh public benefits associated with an SDD and
to balance that with the development standards. Staff felt an SDD was an appropriate vehicle in this
case primarily because of the existing conditions on the site. He noted the GPH, as it presently
existed, was well over on almost every development standard. He referred Council to review the
displayed GPH Zoning Analysis chart. Mike stated that to review a proposal based on those
development standards and to stick to the specific numbers was very difficult,but staff had been able
to review the project based upon TOV's Comprehensive Plan's goals and objectives. The criteria used
in evaluating this proposal were detailed on page 7 of the CDD memo to the PEC dated October 11,
1993. Specifically,Mike discussed the Vail Village Master Plan's Goal No.l and Policy No.3-2 which
called out the GPH as a primary renovation site. Mike said staff had looked at the pros and cons
of the project and identified the public benefits of the project, such as employee housing,
improvements to Seibert Circle and the rental restrictions on some of the accommodation, lock-off
and dwelling units. He advised Council that the architectural changes and modifications that had
occurred to the project over the last two years were fully addressed in this same memo. The SDD
allowed staff to review the architecture,landscaping,streetscape improvements,etc. He said the PEC
and staff recommended approval of the project with listed conditions and understandings. The
criteria for CCI exterior alterations,zoning district amendments,and minor subdivisions were all also
addressed in the October 11, 1993 memo. He noted the property was encumbered with easements
and that was the primary reason staff was supporting the request for a zoning change to CCI. He
added the project would meet all of the minor subdivision criteria. Mike summarized the view
corridor encroachment criteria, and stated staff supported the applicanYs request because staff did
not believe the encroachment would negatively modify or effect the overall purpose and intent of
creating View Corridor#1. He stated the View Corridor Ordinance also gave staff the ability to look
at view corridors or vistas from other public plazas. The PEC had identified the area at the top of
3 Vail Town Couneil Evening Meeting Minutee 10/191'93
. �
.� � � M
Bridge Street as an important view,and that was the primary reason the project had been redesigned
so the central portion of the building had been kept open, so that view was going to be maintained
with the redevelopment of the site. Discussion followed about the view corridor modification
processes.
Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association, (EVHA) read in full the
previously distributed letter of protest dated October 18, 1993, against this project. It was the
position of the EVHA to oppose the creation the GPH SDD because the proposal exceeded all zoning
standards for the CCI zone district, the existing building exceeded all zoning standards, the
expansion of the building beyond zoning standards or an expansion of a non-conforming condition
was a grant of special privilege not generally available to all property owners, and unfashionable
architecture or failure of the property owners to properly maintain a building was insufficient cause
to exceed zoning standards. The letter of protest offered a number of recommendations to achieve
the building's exterior upgrade and reconfiguration of the interior space. Mr. Lamont requested a
meeting with staff and the applicant to review the numbers. He also stated he wanted to see a
financial guarantee that the view corridor would be protected. He was not assured by design
drawings, etc. that the view corridor would be protected during construction and felt fines should
be levied against developers if the view corridors were encroached on. Mr. Willingham responded
to Mr. Lamont's comments by citing the projecrs benefits to the community.
Hank Frazier,George Knox,Kent Rose,Harry Frampton,and an unidentified seven-year Vail resident
encouraged Council to pass this ordinance to renovate the GPH. All felt the existing building was
not characteristic of Vail quality. Jim Gibson,Bob Buckley,and Rob LeVine expressed strong support
for this project,u�dicating it was a positive change for the Town and beautification of Bridge Street.
Merv Lapin stated he had no complaints about the architecture of the building, but was concerned
about the level of development in the Town of Vail. The smallest building was the original one and
ttie largest one (showing the most mass) appeazed to be the latest one. He asked when the bigger
and bigger buildings should stop. He felt TOV was giving up a lot for the density of such buildings.
/1t what point was the obligation on the part of the land owner to improve buildings without�
additional square foolage. He felt the result was going to be an eight and nine story Bridge Street.
He agreed the GPH project was an attractive building,but asked at what price. He felt the density
and number of people that could be handled and still have a quality experience for the tourists and
locals was diminished by greater and greater density. More people would be in the restaurants and
shops and TOV had not increased its infrastructure to handle those people. He felt the quality of life
he wanted,and what he wanted for the tourists,was not represented by the ulcreased density oE this
project. Tom Steu�berg agreed.
After further review of the purpose of SDDs and view comdor protection, Jim Gibson moved to
approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, on first reading, on the basis that it satisfied the nine
criteria required for an SDD and alsd met the twelve conditions of approval recommended by the
PEC as listed in the October 19,1993,CDD memo to Town Council,and on the condition that terms
of the amount of land proposed to be dedicated by VA be reviewed and confirmed by second
i•eading, and that Section 9 of Item 8 of the ordinance be amended or deleted, and that the $32,000
Streetscape contribution be due upon issuance of the building permit. Bob Buckley seconded the
motion. Before a vote was taken, staff was directed to work with Clark Willingham on Section 8,
Item 9. A vote was then taken and the motion passed,42,Tom Steinberg and Merv Lapin opposed.
There was a brief ineeting break from 10:05 Pm to 10:15 P.M. at which time all reassembled for the
next agenda item. .
Item No. 6 was Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance approving a Special
Developinent District (known as SDD No. 30, The Vail Athletic Club) and the development plan in
accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto.
The applicant was JWT/1987 Vail Limited Partnership,aka The Vail Athletic Club. Mayor Osterfoss
read the tide in full. Shelly Mello first reviewed the CDD memo to Council dated October 19, 1993 �
regarding the parking history for the Vail Athledc Club NAC) in response to Council's request for
additional information. According to that memo, after researching the issue, staff found that the
parking requirement as calculated in 1977 appeared to be less than the parking requirement which
would be assessed for the same plans today. The research showed there was a net difference of 5.39 �
parking spaces between what the staff calculated on the 1977 plans and what was calculated for the
existing building. The issue was briefly discussed after which Mayor Osterfoss noted the difference
between the existing and the proposed parking for this project was approxunately nine spaces,and
part of tYus proposal was to have those nine spaces provided. Shelly referred next to the CDD's
memo to Council dated September 30,1993,wherein the parking issue was further addressed. It was
noted parkulg had been a long standing issue on this site. As detailed in the September 30, 1993,
memo, staff reseazch on the issue had found that there were a number of variances granted to this
project. Different arrangements had been made over the years for parking on TOV land as well as
other properties for this project to address the deficit. Variances had been granted for a total of .
twenty spaces over the life of the project. Using today's standards, there was an existing deficit of
58.4 parking spaces for the project. There would be a nine space parking requirement increase as a
,
4 Vail Towa Counc�7 Evening Meeting Minutee 10/19/93 , '
�
,5, _
. _� � � ' �
7
EXHIBIT A � �
PR488RTY i�ESCR�PTJL4N
Th�t p+� �� `�''r Qrd dr in �he �o�ice � the F�g1e�Cawri�y r�Colorado,
ma►p the��of r�c
C1�rk aad Recorder, � deacr:.��d as fol,].ow$:
Ca�noi�g �►t the �v+t1/16 corne� of Sectior� 8, �awn�ahip 5 So�tthr
g�ge g0 Wcat oi the Si�ctih �rincipal Meridian, sttid paint a18o
being the northwe�terl.y car�eac of said Tract �; thence, a.l.ong t�e
northorl.y line of aaid T�act �, N89°44 'Od"E 9.Od t�et ta the �'rue
Poir�t ot Seginningf thence, continuing a7.ong �aid t7�ort�erlY Liner
�t89 44 Op E 7.00 fact tc tho southw�sterly carnRr o� Golden Peak
Souse {A Car�dom�.n�.u� Pra�ect) ac�axding to the map thexeof reoorded
i.n the c�fice ot 1:he EagZa Gounty, �olozado, C�,erk gnd Re�order;
thence the fo],lowing two cour�ee along the co�on line of said
Tt�►ct E �d sllid Gois�cn Peak 8ause: {1) �89°q4' OO��E H4.04 tee�, (2I
��g'45' pq"E �Z.gO teet to the �outheasterly aorn�r o£ $aid Go3den
Peak Hc+n$e3 theaa0, degartia�g snid coumaan liaer 630°15' 0�"$ 6.00
��e��j ti�enca S55•45'04"W a2.50 �eetf theace S3�,nQ2'�5�'W 5.66 fethe
thence S89`44'o�nw 9�..vo �eet th� o
Txue Po9�nt o� Beginn3.ng, m a�.ning 1240 square �eet r more or �es
Da�e:--y���� ,�"�---�.���.
, Stan Hoqf
Calora.do P.S�.S. 26598
revised part o� tract � �c� �o1deA pea}� hause
. � ��j w � � / ✓.�.lil/\
. �� `�V�n.
�p, �q. 93 , ' .�` ,��,�
' • ORDINANCE NO. 28
Series of 1993 �' � ___�G���vo�e� -q- �
l--
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF
THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; REZONING A PORTION OF TRACT E FROM
AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE ZONING TO COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONING, AND
SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS,the developer,Golden Peak House Condominium Association/Vail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. or the successors in interest, has submitted an
application for the establishment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31 which includes
�
a request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration, a request for a minor subdivision, and a
request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for a certain parcel of property within the
Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village First
Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS,the developer has submitted an application to rezone a portion of Tract E, Vail
Village Fifth Filing, more specifically described in Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and Open Space
zone district to the Commercial Core I zone district; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort is consistent with the surrounding and immediately
adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning effort will better reflect the actual use of the land; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is for the benefit of the community as it meets the
municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on October 11, 1993, held a public hearing on the establishment of an SDD and the
rezoning, and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial
to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to establish SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of
the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
Ordinance No.28,
1 Series oi 1993
� � � A � r
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: . �
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
SECTION 2
Special Development District No. 31 is established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space,employee housing,streetscape improvements and other amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental
Commission, and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be
satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 31 is established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District
No. 31 and said 8,375 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4
The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in
Section 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all of the
requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been
fully satisfied.
SECTION 5
The Town Council hereby rezones that portion of Tract E legally described in the attached
Exhibit A, from the Agricultural and Open Space zone district to the Commercial Core I zone
district.
Ordinance No.28,
,L Series o1 1993
,
� � � �
� • SECTION 6
The Town Council finds that the development plan for SDD. No. 31 meets each of the
standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or
demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the
development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The development plan is comprised of those
plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the following documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated September 29, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated May 31, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated September 29, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated September 29, 1993 (second floor plan). - c���� �
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated September 29, 1993 (third floor plan). �+���-�'� r-�-
6. Sheet No. A-10, dated August 31, 1993 (fourth floor plan). °�`"��
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated September 24, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated September 29, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated September 29, 1993 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated September 29, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated September 29, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated September 29, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 7
In addition to the approved development plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these
standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the
development of SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31.
A. Lot Area - The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks - The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans.
Ordinance No.28,
3 Series of 1993
• � � ~ ~ ,
C. Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Building shall be as , .
indicated on the Approved Development Plans.
D. Density Control - The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not
exceed 18,946 square feet. This figure includes 3,091 square feet of excess common area that
has been included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes
fourteen (14) dwelling units and two (2) accommodation units, for a total of fifteen (15) dwelling
units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage -The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94% of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plans.
F. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved
Development Plans.
G. Parking -As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all properties located within the Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by the developer
paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The required number of parking spaces, in
accordance with the Approved Development Plan for SDD No. 31, shall be a total of 15.02
parking spaces. Payment into the parking fund shall occur at the time of Building Permit,
according to Section 18.52.160(6,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 8
The developer agrees with the fotlowing requirements, which are a part of the Town's
approval of the establishment of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the construction of SDD
No. 31, the developer shall permanently restrict two off-site, two-bedroom, employee housing
units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be a minimum size of 700 square
feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance requirements.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project, the developer will contribute $32,000.00 towards the redesign and redevelopment of
Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards the redevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be
credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a future Special Improvement District be created
for this project.
Ordinance No.28,
4 se��es af�ss3
.
� 4 • i
� 3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project, the developer, will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open space
would be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck"
easements and the area of the new sidewalk to be located on Tract E. It was suggested that the
Mill Creek stream tract or the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E be dedicated as permanent open
space.
4. That the developer dedicate to the Town of Vail, a public pedestrian easement,
across Lot C which is located between the Golden Peak House and the Hill Building. The
dedication of the easement shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the
project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, the developer shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units (Units
201 and 401 j to be included in the Golden Peak House short-term rental program, at all times
when they are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, the developer shall restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the building, to
be included in the Golden Peak House short-term rental program at all times when they are not
occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, the developer shall agree to restrict, and place into the short-term rental
program, the finro proposed accommodation units in the building, to be included in the Golden
Peak House short-term rental program at all times when they are not occupied by the owner or
his or her guests.
8. That the developer, or his successors in interest, shall participate in, and shall not
protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s)which may be established by the Town
of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements as set forth in the adopted Town of Vail
Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail Transportation Master Plan, if and when an improvement
district(s) is formed.
9. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include
the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design
Review Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
Ordinance No.28,
5 se��a5 of,ss3
, - � � ,� � ,
10. That the developer further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding -
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
11. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry
on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
12. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 9
The Town Council's approval for the establishment of SDD No. 31, does not include the
developer's request to add a retractable enclosure over approximately 580 square feet of the Los
Amigos outdoor dining deck on the south side of the building. This enclosure is indicated on
Sheet No. A-8, dated September 29, 1993.
SECTION 10
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may
be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public
hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments
which do change the substance of the development plan shatl be required to be approved by
Town Council after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development
Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
SECTION 11
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three
(3) years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. If the developer does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the Special
Development District or any stage of the Special Development District, the developer shall
recommend to the Town Council that either the approval of the Special Development District be
extended, that the approval of the Special Development District be revoked, or that the Special
Development District be amended.
SECTION 12
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
Ordinance No.28,
6 Series of 1993
� � � �
•
� � • and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 13
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and
each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any
one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 14
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 15
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed
and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any
ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1993. A public hearing on this
ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
on the day of , 1993, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
Ordinance No.28,
7 Series of 1993
. • � � ~ � ,
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED � . • .
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THIS DAY OF , 1993.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
Ordinance No.28,
8 Series oS 1993
, {� • �
�
•
� EXHIBIT A � •
PRQPERTY �JESGRTPT7CUN
Tb�4 pa�xt c� Tract B r Va3Z V�.1lage� k'i�th r^.��.ing, acdord.4.nq to the
ma,p the�aof r���rd�dde6crhb�d�a�Cfo1.].awse �agle COL�'i�yr Colorado,
Glark a.nd R�corder,
Co�ae�noi�,g a►t th� N�t1/16 corner of Section 8, �ownship 5 So�tth�
g,�nge g0 Wact afl the Sixth principal Meridian� st�id point a190
being the northw�s�er�.Y co�e� p� $aid Tract 8; thence r along t�:e
no�herl.y lina of aaid Tract �, N84°44 '00"E 3. 04 t�et ta t�e �"rue
Point ot �eginair.g; thence, cantinu�.ng al.ong gaid iZ4rtherlx 1.iner
Dt89'44•Op"E 7.00 fact to tho Qauthwcstezl� cornRr d� Golden Peak
8ouse {A Cor��oms-nL� prp��ct1 accoxding to th� map thexeof recorded
in the oifice of Lhe EagZa County, Colo�ador CJ.ezk and Reoorder;
'�Ei�nCB the fo7,�owing �WO COtlr6�8 along the co�on lfoo �ee�e(23
�.`ttlC1-.. E �11d �aid Gols�cn P�tlk HOL2�C 2 (1) �]89°�I4� 0 Q'�E 84�
�59'45' 4Q"E 52.50 �eet to �he southenst�rly corn�r af said Goiden
Peak Hcsn�a f thencs, dagsrting �aid co�un.an 13.r�e� S 30°�.5'00"S 6. 00
�eetf theaoe� S59•45'04"W a2.50 �ee�� thence S�3I�'42' �5''W 5.6� fethe
thenve S89'�4'00"� 9�.oo �eet ti�e
True Point of Begina9.ng, m a�ning 5.24 0 square �eet r more �r leg
I?ate:�T�� --r�i���•
, Stan Hog�
Ca7.orado P.S�.S. 26598
reviaed part o� tract � to �olde� peak house
� �
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 19, 1993
SUBJECT: A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor subdivision
request, a zone change request and a request for an encroachment into
View Corridor No. 1 for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House,
located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and Tract
E, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium
AssociationNail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners,
Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
On October 11, 1993, the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) recommended
approval of the Golden Peak House. The vote was unanimous (7-Oj. The PEC's motion for
approval did not include the applicant's request to add a retractable enclosure over a portion
of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck. The PEC's recommended conditions of approval
included the following:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the construction of
SDD No. 31, the developer shall permanently restrict two off-site, two-bedroom,
employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit
shall be a minimum size of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of
Vail Housing Ordinance requirements.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project, the developer will contribute $32,000.00 towards the redesign and
redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The $32,000 contribution towards the
redevelopment of Seibert Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak
House, should a future Special Improvement District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment
project, the developer, will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum
area of open space would be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of
the Tract E "overhang and deck" easements and the area of the new sidewalk
to be located on Tract E. It was suggested that the Mill Creek stream tract or
the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E be dedicated as permanent open space.
1
� �
4. That the developer dedicate to the Town of Vail, a public pedestrian easement,
across Lot C which is located between the Golden Peak House and the Hill
Building. The dedication of the easement shall occur prior to the Town's
issuance of a building permit for the project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
' the redevelopment project, the developer shall deed restrict two three-bedroom
dwelling units (Units 201 and 401) to be included in the Golden Peak House
short-term rental program, at all times when they are not occupied by the owner
or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the developer shall restrict, the remaining two lock-
offs in the building, to be included in the Golden Peak House short-term rental
program at all times when they are not occupied by the owner or his or her
guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the developer shall agree to restrict, and place into
the short-term rental program, the two proposed accommodation units in the
building, to be included in the Golden Peak House short-term rental program at
all times when they are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the developer, or his successors in interest, shall participate in, and shall
not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s) which may be
established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements
as set forth in the adopted Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the
Vail Transportation Master Plan, if and when an improvement district(s) is
formed.
9. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor
retail windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan,
which does not include the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of
the building, be reviewed by the Design Review Board and included in the final
building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
10. That the developer further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
11. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main
entry on the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be
lowered.
12. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
2
j -�
, EAST VILLACti,, HOMEOWNERS ASSC,�,,,�TION� INC.
O�ricN�.S: Par:si[�ex'r- Bob Galvin Sec.aFrnRV-Gretta Parks Tr�.nsuaea-Dolph Bridgewater
� Diat�c-roas - Uwight Bcssmer • Patrick Gramm • Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder - Olive Watson
RECEIVED pCT 1 9 1993
To: Mayor Osterfoss and Vail Town Council Members
From: Jim Lamont, Planning Consultant
Date: October 18, 1993
RE: Golden Peak House
Special Development District Application
A protest is hereby submitted on behalf of the East
Village Homeowners Association of the application requesting
designation of the Golden Peak House (GPH) as a Special
Development District (SDD) .
It is the position of the Homeowners Association to
oppose the creation of Special Development Districts that:
1. Exceed zoning standards for established zone
districts.
2 . Violate established or proposed view corridors and
open space lands.
3 . Becomes a grant of special privilege, not generally
available to all property owners.
4 . For existing buildings, any provision that would
cause an already exceeded zoning standard to be further
expanded.
The Golden Peak House Special Development District
application does not conform to items 1, 2, 3 , and 4 above.
* The GPH SDD proposal exceeds all zoning standards for
the Commercial Core I zone district, according to planning
staff inemoranda.
* The existing building exceeds all zoning standards,
according to planning staff inemoranda.
* The expansion of the building be�ond zoning standards
or an expansion of a non-conforming condition is a grant of
special privilege not generally available to all property
owners.
* Unfashionable architecture or failure of the property
owners to properly maintain a building is insufficient cause
to exceed zoning standards.
The Homeowners Association recognizes that the zoning
code provides for the right of the pro�erty owner to replace
the structure to it present configuration should it be
destroyed. Therefore, it is recommended that any alteration
PosT OrricF Box 238 • Vnn., Coi.oan�o 81658
/ ��
. � e •
� RECEI�lFD G,�; l 9 1993
To: Mayor Osterfoss and Vail Town Council Members
From: Jim Lamont, Planning Consultant
Date: October 18, 1993
RE: Golden Peak House
Special Development District Application
Page 2
to the structure be done within the confines of the existing
building envelope. As a consequence, the building would
qualify for the required variances necessary to reconfigure
the interior space and upgrade the building exterior.
It is recommended, in order to achieve the building's
exterior upgrade and reconfiguration of the interior space:
a. Roof domers on the 5th floor East Wing, North
Elevation should be removed. The sloping roof should be
retained and brought into conformance with the Vail Village
View Corridor. This approach would have the net effect of
reducing GRFA, as well as reducing the building's bulk and
mass of the building.
b. Ceiling heights on the 5th floor East Wing Penthouse,
South Elevation should be reduced to eight (8) feet, using
domers to reduce the flat roof areas. The resulting effect
will reduce GRFA, as well as the bulk and mass of the
building. Also, it will bring greater compliance with the
Vail Village View Corridor.
c. Ceiling heights on the 5th floor West Wing Penthouse,
South Elevation, should be lowered, thus reducing the bulk
and mass of the building. The double pitch of proposed roof
should be maintained. The resulting effect will further open
view of Vail Mountain from Bridge Street and bring greater
compliance with the Vail Village View Corridor.
d. Drip Easement/Open Space Tract should be used only
to improve the building's compliance with zoning standard.
1. The estimated 410 sq. ft. of GRFA proposed to
project into the drip easement/open space tract land
should be eliminated. The effect would be to
further reduce excessive GRFA as well as reduce the
bulk and mass of the building.
2 . Balcony projections proposed to project further into
the drip easement/open space tract land should be
eliminated. The effect would be to further reduce
the bulk and mass of the building.
3 . Deck covering proposed for restaurant deck located on
the drip easement/open space tract should be
eliminated. The effect would be to further reduce
the bulk and mass of the building.
� �
. � �
� REC�iV�� �,; _ ; 1 � 1993
To: Mayor Osterfoss and Vail Town Council Members
From: Jim Lamont, Planning Consultant
Date: October 18, 1993
RE: Golden Peak House
Special Development District Application
Page 3
In addition to the forgoing, the following conditions
should be attached to any approval of the project.
e: Streetscape improvements should be a proportional
amount of the GRFA in excess of the underlying zone to that
required of the Christiania Special Development District. The
Christiania requirement was for 19% in excess GRFA allowed.
A condition of approval was $40, 000 in landscape/streetscape
improvements on public and private property.
The GPH GRFA requested, exceeds the standard b 139%.
If approved as p . e , �ie GPH SDD should be require
pay, at a minimum, for $280, 000 of new landscape and
streetscape improvements. A specified amount should be a
condition of approval.
Streetscape improvements should not be condition upon
the formation of a Special Improvement District. An escrow
fund should be established for the construction of Siebert
Circle, to be spent when sufficient funds are available from
neighboring property owners and other sources.
f. Acquisition of Mill Creek Stream Tract and
Space/Pirate Ship Park should be required in exchange for the
appending of the drip easement/open space tract to the GPH
site. The cost of acquiring the park should be credited to
the Streetscape escrow account. The applicant should be
responsible for the care and maintenance of the open
space/park according to approved standards.
g. Employee housing requirements should be met either
on-site or off-site.
h. The "Pay-in-lieu Loading Space Fee should be
required for the absence of a required on-site loading space.
A minimum of $50, 000 should be set aside in an escrow
account.
i. A central storage room within the building, large
enough to provide short term freight storage for all on-site
uses should be required. The storage room should be directly
accessible to a freight elevator that must have direct and
adequate access to the street.
Additional comments, concerns, and recommended
conditions may be forthcoming, subject to further review of
the proposal by the Board of Directors and membership.
� #
� VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1993
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
7:35 P.M. 2. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance
Tom Moorhead submitting to the registered electors of the Town of Vail at the
Steve Thompson Regular Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, the 16th of
November, 1993, the question of whether the Town of Vail sales
taxes should increase $2,100,000.00 annualty by the imposition of
a new sales tax of 0.9% on restaurants and bars and a new sales
tax of 1.8% on lodging beginning on January 1, 1994, and each
subsequent year; the annual revenues shall be designated
exclusively for the construction, mariceting and operation of a
performance and conference center; authorizing the Town of Vail
to increase debt up to $14,400,000.00 by issuance of negotiable
interest bearing bonds for the purpose of providing the construction,
marketing and operation of a performanoe and conference center;
providing for the cessation of such portion of the tax increase that
is no longer necessary to service the revenue bonds; setting forth
the ballot title; providing for notice of the election; providing for
conduct of the election; providing further details in relation to the
foregoing.
Action Recwested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
22, Series of 1993, on second reading.
7:50 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance
Steve Thompson repealing and reenacting Section 3.40.170 of the Municipal Code
Tom Moorhead of the Town of Vail deleting the definition of "charitable."
Action Recauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
22, Series of 1993, on second reading.
Backqround Rationale: This ordinance would remove present
restrictive definition of "charitable organization" presently in TOi/'s
Muniapal Code.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 24, Series of
1993, on second reading.
7:55 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1993, first reading, an annual
Steve Thompson appropriation ordinance: adopting a budget and finanaal plan and
making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of
the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its fiscal year January 1, 1994,
through December 31, 1994, and providing for the levy assessment
and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1993
ta�c year and payable in the 1994 fiscal year.
Action Rectuested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
26, Series of 1993, on first reading.
1
� �
8:15 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance '
Mike Mollica establishing Special Development District No. 31 (Golden Peak
House) and providing for a development plan and iis contents;
development standards; and other special provisions; and setting
forth details in regard thereto. Applicants: Golden Peak House
Condominium AssociationNail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners,
Lbd./AAargaritaville, Inc.
Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
28, Series of 1993, on first reading.
BackQround Rationale: Please see the CDD memo to the PEC
dated 10/11/93. On 10/11/93, the PEC recommended conditional
approval (by a vote of 7-0) of the applicants' requests.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of
1993, on first reading.
9:45 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance
Shelly Mello approving a Speaal Development District (known as SDD No. 30,
The Vail Athletic Club) and the development plan in accordance
with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and Setting forth
� details in regard thereto.
Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify OrcJinance No.
27, Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backqround Rationale: On 9/27/93, the PEC unanimously
recommended approval to Council for the establishment of an SDD
for the Vail Athletic Club. The PEC's conditions are detailed in the
attached memo to Council dated 9/30/93. Further, on 10/5/93,
Council reviewed the project at a Work Session. During the
discussion of this item, Council was concerned with the apparent
deviations in pa�lcing. Staff has researched this item and has
detailed the results in the attached memo dated 10/14/93.
Staff Recommendation: The PEC and staff recommend approval
of this item with conditions as detailed in the 9/30/93 memo.
11:00 P.M. 7. Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance
Andy Knudtsen rezoning 7.710 acres from Agricultural and Open Space, Section
18.32 to Low Density Multi-Family, Section 18.16 located between
Tract C, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch and Parcel B. Applicant: Town
of VailNail Housing Authority.
Action Recauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
21, Series of 1993, on first reading.
BackQround Rationale: Please see background and analysis of
criteria in the staff memorandum dated 10/11/93. On 10/11/93, the
PEC recommended to approve (7-0) the requested rezoning with
the conditions as ou�ined in the staff cover memo dated 10/14/93.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 21, Series of
1993, on first reading.
11:45 P.M. 8. Resolution No. 12, Series of 1993, a resolution renaming Kel-Gar
Tom Moorhead Lane to Black Bear Lane.
Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Resolution No.
12, Series of 1993.
2
' ^ � �
i�
.
MEMORANDUM � ��E �Q p Y
TO. Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 11, 1993
SUBJECT: A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor subdivision request, a
zone change request and a request for an encroachment into View Corridor No.
1 for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, located at 278 Hanson
Ranch Road/Lots A, B and C, Block 2, and Tract E, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
:;,:....,.
»�.::
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW & DESCRIPTION OF THE RE�UESTS
The Golden Peak House was originally constructed in 1966, and since that time there have
been only minor, cosmetic modifications made to the exterior of the structure. The project is
located in the Commercial Core I zone district. Generally, this proposed redevelopment for
the Golden Peak House includes a renovation of the entire building. The existing "butterfly"
roof form would be removed, and gable roofs added. The proposal includes the addition of a
new fourth floor (on the western end of the structure) and the addition of a new fifth floor (on
the eastern end). Architectural modifications to the structure would include the addition of
sloped roofs, a small area of flat roof, the addition of dormers, balconies, bay windows, and
other architectural projections. '
The existing center area of the building, which includes the circular ramp, is generally used as
common area for pedestrian circulation. With the redevelopment, the applicant is proposing to
infill this entire central area and to add a full basement beneath the structure.
Additional retail/commercial space would be added to the building. Specifically, at-grade retail
shops would continue to be located along the north etevation, and the second floor restaurant
(Los Amigos) would remain. However, the restaurant's public entrance would be relocated to
the northwest corner of the building and the restaurant would be expanded with the addition of
a retractable enclosure over a portion of the outdoor dining deck.
The following is an outline of the major modifications which are being proposed for the
building:
Fourth Floor - The proposal includes the addition of a new faurth floor, which would
be located on the western end of the structure. The proposed fourth floor has been
designed to be set back approximately 12 to 18 feet from the face of the building
1
"� � , .
.#
r�
adjacent to Bridge Street. The roof ridge, in this area, has been reoriented so that it
runs east to west.
This new fourth floor area is designed to include one dwelling unit, with a GRFA of
1,834 square feet. By pulling the fourth floor back from Bridge Street, the applicant
proposes to shift some of this new GRFA into the "overhang and deck" easement area
(Tract E) along the south side of the building. The staff has calculated that
approximately 410 square feet of GRFA would be located in this easement area.
Fifth Floor - The proposal includes the addition of a new fifth floor, which would be
located on the eastern end of the structure. As with the new fourth floor, the fifth floor
would also be set back from Bridge Street, in this case approximately 10-14 feet, from
the face of the north elevation.
This new fifth floor area is designed to include one dwelling unit, with a GRFA of 2,763
square feet. The fifth floor unit would have a south-facing exterior deck, which has
been designed so that it would not project over the central portion of the structure, and
therefore would not be visible from Bridge Street.
The Tract E and Lot C issues - Tract E is the large parcel of land located to the
south of the Golden Peak House. The parcel includes a portion of the Mill Creek
stream tract, Pirate Ship Park and the Vista Bahn ski base. Tract E is owned by Vail
Associates.
In 1971, Vail Associates granted easements to the Golden Peak House to allow for
specific encroachments (such as roof overhangs and balconies) to extend into portions
of Tract E. These easements have been referred to as the "overhang and deck"
easements. The Tract E easement areas total 1,240 square feet. Tract E is currently
zoned Agricultural and Open Space. The Town considers these encroachments to be
legal, non-conforming uses within the Agricultural and Open Space Zone District, and
as such, they cannot be enlarged or expanded, and if modified, they must be brought
into full compliance with the zoning code. The applicant is now requesting that these
easement portions of Tract E be incorporated into the Golden Peak House parcel and
be rezoned from Agriculture and Open Space to Commercial Core I zoning. Generally,
the easement areas are those areas which are labeled as Easement #1, Easement #2
and Easement #3, on the property survey.
Part of Lot C is approximately 209 square feet in size and is zoned CCI. Lot C is
located west of the Golden Peak House site and is also owned by Vail Associates. Lot
C includes part of the skier access, between the Hill Building and the Golden Peak
House.
The applicants have entered into a contract with Vail Associates for the acquisition of
the above described portions of Tract E (generally located to the south of the building)
and Lot C (to the west of the building).
2
` � j � � �
The applicants (including Vail Associates, as co-applicant), have requested a zone
change amendment for the easement portions of Tract E that are proposed to be
incorporated into the Golden Peak House parcel. In order to allow for building
additions and modifications in the easement areas, and to be in full compliance with
the zoning code, the applicants have proposed the following:
•Rezone the Tract E easement areas from Agricultural/Open Space to CCI.
•Minor subdivision to incorporate the easement areas (Tract E and Lot C) into
the Golden Peak House parcel.
•SDD overlay on the entire Golden Peak House parcel.
As proposed, there would be approximately 71 square feet of above-grade commercial
floor area located in the west "overhang & deck" easement area (on the basement,
ground and second floors), and the south "overhang & deck" easement would have
approximately 410 square feet of above-grade GRFA, (on the fourth floor) located in
the easement area. There would also be approximately 775 square feet of below-
grade commercial square footage in the south easement area. This below-grade
space would be owned by Vail Associates and the proposed use of the space would
be for the Vail Associates private ski school, customer lounge.
Streetscape improvements - The applicant has proposed a contribution, to the Town,
to be used specifically for the future redevelopment and improvement of Seibert Circle.
The contribution would be in the amount of $10,000.00.
Employee housing - Two off-site, permanently restricted, two-bedroom employee
housing units, are proposed as a part of the redevelopment.
Use Restrictions - The appticant has proposed to "restrict" two three-bedroom
dwelling units (Units 201 and 401), to be included in the Golden Peak House rental
pool. These units would be included in the rental pool at all times when they are not
occupied by the owner or the owner's guests. The total GRFA for these units is 3,002
square feet.
Los Amigos deck - Ron Riley, one of the co-applicants in the redevelopment and co-
owner of the restaurant, has proposed a retractable enclosure over a portion of the Los
Amigos outdoor dining deck, on the south side of the building. This enclosure would
cover 580 square feet, or 53%, of the Los Amigos dining deck. The total deck area is
1,094 square feet. The proposal includes the addition of an overhead retractable
(canvas) awning, with folding Rekord doors on the east side and sliding glass doors
(which fold back into a pocket) along the west side of the enclosure. The south facing
portion of the deck enclosure would consist of removable wood and glass panels. The
applicant proposes to remove this enclosure during all daytime hours when weather
permits so that the space may be used for year round evening dining.
3
� � `' .. .
General site improvements - The proposal includes the following site modifications,
which would be completed around the perimeter of the Golden Peak House:
1. A concrete unit paver walkway, with an integral snowmelt system, would
be added along the north elevation and along a portion of the west
elevation. A flagstone walk is also proposed along the south side of the
building.
2. The existing trash enclosure, currently located along the west elevation
of the building, would be removed. A new trash compactor would be
located in the basement of the Golden Peak House. A small elevator
would be added to transport the refuse up to the ground floor when
trash pick-ups are scheduled. This would occur at the northeast corner
of the building.
3. Improvements to the skier/pedestrian access, west of the building, would
include the relocation of the existing fire hydrant (out of the pedestrian
way) and the addition of a permanent planter with a large specimen
evergreen. The details of the specific improvements are described
further in the Streetscape Master Plan section of this memorandum.
Construction Codes - The entire structure would be brought into compliance with all
of the current Building and Fire Codes, (the building would be fully sprinkled).
Zoning issues - There are currently 18 dwelling units (0 accommodation units and 0
lock-offs) located in the building. The redevelopment proposal would include 14
dwelling units (3 with lock-offs) and 2 accommodation units, for a total of 15 dwelling
units. Please note that for zoning purposes, two accommodation units are equal to
one dwelling unit.
The existing Golden Peak House exceeds the CCI development standards in the
categories of Building Height, Common Area, GRFA, Density (units), Site Coverage
and Loading.
a) The redevelopment project would further exceed the existin conditions in
the following categories:
•Building Height - An increase of 3' for the eastern portion of the
building and an increase of 7-11' for the western portion of the building.
•Density - GRFA - An increase of approximately 5,300 square feet.
•Site Coverage - An increase of approximately 1,522 square feet.
b) The redevelopment project would be brought more into compliance with the
standards, than the existing building, in the following zoning categories:
•Common Area - A decrease of 1,191 square feet of common area.
•Density (Number of Units) - A decrease of 3 dwelling units.
4
. ' .' � �
�'
c) Although the existing project does not meet the loading standard, the
redevelopment project would not increase or modify the requirement, per the
zoning code. The project would continue to lack the required one loading berth.
In order to accomplish the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, as outlined
above, the applicants have made the following requests:
1. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District - This
provides the overlay zoning which allows the applicant to design the project
with some flexibility regarding the development standards, and it allows the
Town the ability to review the project with regard to overall community benefit.
2. A request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration - Any project which is
located in CCI, and which proposes to add or remove 100 square feet of floor
area, must meet the exterior alteration standards.
3. A request to encroach into View Corridor No. 1 - The proposed redesign of the
Golden Peak House will involve an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1.
The vantage point of this view corridor is at the Vail Transportation Center
central stairway. The view extends over the Village Core up to the ski
mountain. At the maximum point, the existin building encroaches 12.1' into
the corridor. At the maximum point, the proposed building would encroach 17'
into the corridor.
4. A request for a rezoninq - The applicant is proposing to rezone a portion of
Tract E, from Agricultural and Open Space, to Commercial Core I. The area of
Tract E proposed to be rezoned consists of 1,240 square feet.
5. A reauest for a minor subdivision - This request involves the inclusion of the
rezoned Tract E parcel into the Golden Peak House parcel, and the inclusion of
Lot C into the Golden Peak House parcel.
5
� � '• • .' .
�
V c
� so
� J V
� ��
C• W a
a o m
LL E `� � 3
� •�
C7 0 � ox
o � �
� � N tD � N o Q a
Q � � p o m N �� � a �c
� �Z � E � � � X N y Y � O
� � f � � �� � � � _ � ��
p v � rc� � N ° ° ' � � � a � ° � � o r r s_
� � O r c0 O V V •� `� � � � Q, N C7 � 'O a N N p o
N
a y � N � � N � y N � N d � V O y
Q � .. .. � U . . 0 � � � m
N in � � � 0�0 p � � V n � Q Q 0 O S �
a � ro >� ?� � ui m co v c � cd � � � � � c
00 Z � (n W W > u� N <7 � I� �n � � a f7 .
t T m �
� o
� m °m
m o
N m Q
Q c o a
� E ��
� �p � �
o U o � v
�
c
U o � Nao p �W
w � - o , � � � o ^w
p °' �� rnc�'�'nv X � n ��
oC `° � co `� � `° v ° �-
a o cor � c� `o `o , � `o �
0
- (!� r O � O � � � � � .r
z � � � H �' y � " 5,r sa
(n lCC IA � m I� N N 00 N � N N m m 01 m m m ; �
X x � � � ��N �N'�C� � � A fE0 f�0 l�d lE0 fE0 c �
W N � Z � V) W N CO N � CO � � Ul CO N Vl Yl N N N � N
��
c
� y L
C~
A ��L'.
O �u�i �
Q � m
Q E ��
C7 t°
U O p
F- � O tn p
x �C o -p H � � �
W la N � u� N � � N a �'
� ro E E `rco � xN in rn o� 10
a `m ccncoN � � ° ° `° � ,� � � � �o
N � � Yi
N � o z o00o vc� � � � � v � o z � � .� �
� Z Q Q �? � Q a w « y d N rn �i y in � O
J H �� � .. •_ nrn � � � `° '� a d 'S 'S •� cc ao �'�° o
Q c� X � y w c� r��ao �n ��� � �n E Q �,H rn n s �
X �p d (O � t0 T � C7 � N m X r (�j � y �
Q W � cc Z � (n W W �i cc � a o�� � cD rn � � W f� N !� �
� S m
C� �� m
�
z �� $
Z v v �s �
o �
� N l0 L � 10
N � � �_ <
c
W �ry — ro co m � �� o
fA Zw a a � a rn rn � m �
� Z � m � � a o � o m � C c g�_ �
� � �U °,� `o � 'n LL o m'v, °''� :� 'v . Q`°
m � co � co m � ro �ry � m g�-m,� �
= C'3 � s � `oc3 0 °o � `o > � > > � a� �
� � U � � •�°-,' c`°*� r�i .� � � ao ,_ •ca �� p p � ?_ o
Q Qw � > m � � Q N Y � > 0 F f- Y3 =A m
W N m � N 3 N . N N N N � o�
a � � �n � _ .. .. �n s g = � o = � � _ �, A �u
Z � � � d �` 00 (`�') � 1� � GO � N � d N Q a �a°A
W . C� CO 4- � c0 V N O c0 N a cD d � a a Z Z E a'� mk
� N N �� � 5
J � � m �� N
0 � rn = ° o � �
C'3 Q `° � m a a=oc�
fO N C d 2 ` O
Q /E t � Q U N � � � (q
N �O ` "d N
�
� (p (n = U C3 � !4 J O. J U C7 . .
.•� 'a � � •
III. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the purpose of Special Development Districts is as follows:
"The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and
creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate
use; to improve the design character and quality of new development within the
town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities;
to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further
the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction
with a property's under(ying zone district, shall establish the requirements for
guiding development and uses of property included in the special development
district."
The Planning Staff finds that the Golden Peak House application for the establishment of an
SDD meets the Special Development District purpose as stated above. Specifically, we find
that the Golden Peak House application furthers the overall goals of the community as stated
in the Vail Comprehensive Plan ( i.e Vail Village Master Plan, Streetscape Master Plan and
Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan). The overall redesign of the project proposes to
improve the design character, function and overall quality of the development. Emp�oyee
housing units are proposed to be provided as a part of the redevelopment as well as
streetscape improvements. Two dwelling units would be "restricted" and placed in the short-
term rental pool. Two new accommodation units and three new lock-offs would be added to
the building. Overall, the staff finds that the redevelopment project meets many of the specific
goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recognizes that the existing building exceeds many of the underlying zoning's
development standards. We feel that the project's overages have been handled in a way that
minimize the impacts on adjacent properties and public spaces. We also betieve that there
are a number of community benefits associated with this redevelopment. These benefits
would include the provision of employee housing, streetscape improvements, the two new
accommodation units, the two restricted dwelling units and the contribution towards the future
redevelopment of Seibert Circle. Overall, we feel the project will further the Town's design
and development goals, and we would specifically cite Goal No. 1 and Policy No. 3-2 of the
Vail Village Master Plan, which state:
"Goal #1 -
Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale
of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity."
"#3-2 Golden Peak House -
Due to this building's gross inconsistency with the Urban Design Guide Plan
and neighboring buildings, it is identified as a primary renovation site.
Relationship to greenspace on south, Seibert Circle on north, as well as to
mountain entryway, are important considerations. Loading and delivery must
be addressed."
7
� � � ^j� •, •�
IV. SDD CRITERIA
The following are the nine special development district criteria to utilized by the Planning and
Environmental Commission when evaluating SDD proposals. ��,e
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood
and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building
height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
The staff thought that it would be helpful to provide the PEC with a summary of the
architectural design issues that have been identified and addressed by the applicants
over the course of the last four or five worksessions.
The following comments should be reviewed in conjunction with the proposed elevation
drawings for the Golden Peak House. In general, staff believes that the overall
architectural style is positive and would be compatible with the alpine character of Vail
Village. The applicant has responded to many of the PEC and staff comments
regarding the architectural design.
NORTH ELEVATION
1. The central connection between the east and west halves of the building has
been cut back to the east, and the roof forms have been simplified and
lowered. The deck and hot tub, originally located on the roof of this central
connection, has been relocated to the south side of the fifth floor addition, to a
less visible �ocation.
2. The originally proposed flat roofs have been redesigned, and are now pitched.
The design is similar to the roof forms utilized at the Sonnenalp and Christiania.
The roof design incorporates a truncated peak instead of the traditional ridge
peak. The intent of this design is to remove all flat roofs which would be visible
from the Bridge Street vantage point, and from the ski mountain.
3. The fifth floor building mass has been pulled back from the face of the
building's north elevation approximately 10 to 14 feet. In addition, the applicant
has added three dormers on the north elevation of the fifth floor, to provide
architectural relief for this portion of the building.
4. The staff believes that the first floor commercial spaces continue to be in need
of refinement to create more of a pedestrian area and to bring the north facade
down to more of a pedestrian scale. The staff has recommended the following:
• Embellishing the design of the windows and doors through interesting
detailing, such as subdivided window panes (to express individual
window elements), articulated entry doors, etc.
• Lowering the roof form over the main entry.
8
.-: �_ � �
• Adding the arcade, or canopy, back into the design. This element was
originally proposed over the first floor retail windows on the north
elevation, and has recently been eliminated.
5. The staff has concerns with the recently modified ground floor plan, which
includes a curved store front at the eastern end of the building. We believe the
applicant should utilize the original ground floor plan, which provides a much
more pedestrian-friendly environment along the shop fronts. The addition of the
arcade along the north elevation would also be an asset to the building.
EAST ELEVATION
1. The applicant has designed a peaked roof form that conceals the small flat roof
section behind it. Architectural detailing has been added to this elevation.
WEST ELEVATION
1. In order to diminish the "canyon" effect through the skier/pedestrian access to
the mountain, the third and fourth floor projections have been decreased in size
and floor area. However, a small area of the three lower floors (Los Amigos
Restaurant and lower level commercial space) continues to project into Lot C.
All other floor area has been removed from Lot C.
2. The applicant has proposed to relocate three of the four evergreens, located
adjacent to the building along the west elevation, onto Tract E. In addition, the
large aspen located at the southwest corner of the building will also be
relocated onto Tract E. Because landscaping in this corridor is so critical, as it
is a transition area between the Village and the ski mountain, the applicant has
agreed to add a stone-faced planter, with a 20' tall specimen evergreen,
adjacent to the west elevation in the skier access.
3. The entry into the Vail Associates commercial space, on the south side of the
building (under the Los Amigos deck), has been reconfigured by reorienting the
entry to the north. Staff believe that this change provides a more accessible
and inviting entry. Heated concrete unit pavers will be added in front of this
entry.
4. The first floor retail windows have been changed to include smaller panes
(divided lights) to add visual interest and to create a more pedestrian scale.
SOUTH ELEVATION
1. The applicant has redesigned the roof forms and has eliminated all visible flat
roofs as discussed above.
2. The fourth floor is proposed to have 410 square feet of GRFA located within the
"overhang & deck" easement areas. Additionally, the new below-grade
commercial area, located beneath the Los Amigos dining deck, would also be
9
. � ' � • �♦ ,.•
proposed to be located within the Tract E easement areas. To respond to this
issue, the applicants have proposed to mitigate the use of the Tract E
easement areas by donating open space to the Town. Vail Associates has
proposed to donate a portion of Tract E, to be used as permanent open space.
3. The roofs over some of the south facing balconies have been cut back to help
decrease the mass and bulk of the building.
4. Landscaping along this elevation has been addressed by the addition of the
three transplanted evergreen trees and the transplanted aspen onto Tract E.
The applicant has also proposed to add shrubs along the base of the Los
Amigos dining deck anc� a flagstone walkway.
5. As previously discussed in Section I of this memorandum, the applicant is
proposing to add a retractable enclosure over 580 square feet of the Los
Amigos dining deck. As designed, the enclosure would consist of an overhead
retractable (canvas) awning, with folding Rekord doors on the east side and
sliding glass doors (which fold back into a pocket) along the west side. The
south facing portion of the deck enclosure would consist of removable wood
and glass panels.
The staff believes that the applicants have done a very good job redesigning
and modifying the building to reduce the mass and bulk. We feel that this
proposed deck enclosure, over approximately one-half of the outdoor dining
deck, would add further to the mass and bulk of the structure. We strongly
believe that an outdoor dining experience is what many visitors to Vail desire,
and we seriously question the feasibility of removing the retractable cover and
enclosure on a daily basis. Staff also believes that the design of the structure
is not compatible with the design guidelines of the Village.
Staff recognizes that, in addition to the deck enclosure, there are other portions
of the building which would extend into the "overhang & deck" easements.
However, we believe that the design of these areas of the structure have an
overall positive benefit on the building's mass and bulk in that the public's
perception of the building mass would actually be reduced, and that view lines
up to the ski mountain have been opened up. In the case of the deck
enclosure, we view this as a loss of 580 square feet of "public space", in a
prominent location in respect to the skier services at the base of Vail Village,
and we can find no community benefit in the request. We also believe that
approving the deck enclosure, when there is no means at this time to expand
the deck onto other areas (Tract E to the south}, sets a negative precedent.
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING
1. The detailing on the balcony railings has been modified and the railings now
have a more ornamental feel and reflect more of the Vail alpine character.
10
..' : • � '
2. The window detailing, such as the bay window, on the western portion of the
north elevation has been carried through to the other parts of the project.
3. The proposed roofing material on the building is a tar and gravel roof. Staff
believes that the originally proposed shake roof should be added back into the
design of the building. We feel that a shake roof would be more in keeping
with the character of the Village and would be more aesthetically pleasing.
In summary, the staff believes that the building's architectural design is at a point
where it would be compatible with the immediate environment and adjacent properties.
We feel that the architectural style will be a significant improvement over the existing
style of the Golden Peak House building, and we feel that the character of the design
would be in keeping with the Town's Design Guidelines recommended for Vail Village,
excluding the deck enclosure.
With regard to overall mass and bulk, we feel that by shifting the mass of the fifth floor
to the south, as well as the fourth floor (of the western-most portion of the building) to
the south, the pedestrian perception of the structure will be one of a three and four
story building. We believe the building meets the CCI review criteria for Street
Enclosure and Street Edge, as we feel the building will provide a "comfortable"
enclosure for the street. The fact that the grade changes approximately one level,
from north to south through the site, will also help minimize the appearance of the
structure.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
It is the staff's position that the mixture of uses proposed for the site is compatible with
the existing uses on surrounding properties. The uses proposed would meet the
purpose and intent of the CCI zone district.
With regard to density, the overall square footage of the project is proposed to be
increased, (commercial and residential square footage). The redevelopment includes
the addition of 5,706 square feet of GRFA and 6,835 sq. ft. of commercial floor area.
A portion of this square footage is located within the central atrium area of the building.
This area is 2,400 square feet in size. The "actual density" is proposed to be reduced.
The number of dwelling units will be reduced from 18 to 15. The number of "keys", or
rentable rooms will actually increase from 18 to 19, which is positive. Two new
accommodation units would be added, which is also positive. Staff would recommend
that the two new accommodation units be restricted, so that in the future, they cannot
be converted into dwelling units via the Condominium Conversion section of the
Subdivision Regulations and that the units be used only as short-term rentals.
In addition, the applicant has proposed to "restrict" two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in the Golden Peak House rental pool. These units
have a combined GRFA of 3,002 square feet and would be included in the rental pool
at all times when they are not occupied by the owner or the owner's guests. It should
be noted that the applicant's proposed use restriction is not the same restriction that is
11
� � '�' ..
normally required by the Town. We generally use the Condominium Conversion
restriction, which is in the Subdivision Regulations, a copy of which is attached to this
memorandum (Exhibit B).
In addition to the proposed rental restrictions on Units 201 and 401, staff believes that
the rental restrictions should also be placed upon the remaining two lock-off units
proposed to be located within the building. This would include the lock-offs for Units
305 and 306. These two lock-offs would have a combined GRFA of 641 square feet.
As indicated in many of the Vail Village Master Plan Goals and Objectives, increasing
the availability of short-term overnight accommodations is strongly encouraged. The
staff believes that it will be a benefit to the community to utilize these lock-offs as
short-term accommodation units and we believe that by restricting these units, to be
placed into the short-term renta! pool, that we will further the community's goals.
Employee Housing Issues - As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of
the Town's Master Plans, employee housing is a critical Town issue which should be
addressed through the planning process for this type of development proposal. For the
Golden Peak House review, the staff has analyzed the employee housing issue
utilizing two methods. We have calculated the estimated employee housing demand
using the Town adopted Employee Housing Report, and secondly, we have studied
information provided by the applicant with regard to the individual business owners'
estimates of employee generation, due to increases in the sizes of their individual
commerciaf spaces.
The Employee Housing Report, prepared for the Town of Vait by the consulting firm
Rosall Remmen and Cares, indicates the recommended ranges of employee housing
units based upon type of use and floor area. For the Golden Peak House analysis, the
staff has utilized the mid oint of the suggested ranges, for employees generated. A
copy of the report's summary page is attached to this memorandum (Exhibit A).
Utilizing the guidelines in this report, the staff has analyzed the incremental increase,
of the numbers of employees (square footage per use), that the proposed
redevelopment would create. The summary is as follows:
a) Bar/Restaurant = 878 sq. ft.(@ 6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 5.7 employees
b) Retail/Service Commercial = 4,436 sq. ft.(@6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 28.8 employees
c) Lodging = 1 room (Ca� 0.75/room) = OJ5 emplovees
d) Total = 35.25 employees
•35.25 employees x .15 housing multiplier = 5.2 employees.
•35.25 employees x .30 housing multiplier = 10.5 employees.
In summary, the staff estimates that the Golden Peak House redevelopment would
create a need for six to eleven additional employees. This range is due to the housing
multiplier that varies from 0.15 to 0.30. The 0.15 housing multiplier is suggested to be
12
. , •• , � •
utilized when projects do not exceed allowable density and GRFA. The 0.30 housing
multiplier is recommended for use when projects are over on density. The existing and
proposed Golden Peak House is over on density.
Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit to be provided, it is possible to
calculate up to finro employees per bedroom. For example, for a two-bedroom unit in
the size range of 450 to 900 square feet, it is possible that this unit would be capable
of accommodating up to four employees. A two-bedroom unit, with a size less than
450 square feet, would only be considered capable of housing one employee per
bedroom.
The applicant has provided letters from the "major tenant space owners" in the Golden
Peak House to address and evaluate the employee housing impacts of the
redevelopment. Paul Johnston, representing Christiania Realty, Inc., has addressed
the hotel/condominium expansion in the Golden Peak House. Paul believes that there
will be no increase in the staff for the lodging needs of the building, given this
redevelopment. Michael Staughton, representing the Los Amigos Restaurant, also
does not believe that there will be any need for additional employees as a result of the
restaurant's renovation and expansion. Lastly, Jack Hunn, representing Vail
Associates, Inc., has indicated that two new employees would be needed to operate
the new Vail Associates space proposed to be located on the ground floor of the
Golden Peak House. Overall, the applicant has estimated that a total of two additional
employees would be generated as a result of the Golden Peak House expansion. To
mitigate this impact, GPH Partners, Ltd. had originally proposed that one two-bedroom
condominium unit, located in Pitkin Creek Park, be permanently deed restricted as an
employee housing unit.
Since the September 13, 1993 PEC worksession, the applicant has agreed to provide
one additional two-bedroom employee housing unit as a part of the redevelopment.
According to the analysis above, two two-bedroom units (in the 700-1,000 square foot
range) would provide housing for up to eight employees.
The staff believes that the applicant's provision for housing up to eight employees is
� reasonable. We think that the 6.5 multiplier, for the retail/service commercial use, may
be slightly high, given the type of commercial expansions associated with this project.
Overall, the staff believes that with the two two-bedroom housing units provided, the
project would now satisfy the Town's employee housing requirement. The employee
housing units would be located off-site, however, the exact location of the units has not
yet been identified. Both units will be required to meet the Town of Vail Housing
Ordinance.
C. Compliance with the parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter
18.52.
The staff has determined that the incremental increase in the required parking, due to
the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, would be 15.02 parking spaces.
Because this property is located in the Commercial Core I zone district, which does not
allow for the provision of on-site parking, the developer will be required to pay into the
13
����. _
__ .
� `�' •' '
Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. According to Section 18.52.160 (B,5) of the Municipal
Code, "the parking fee is $8,000 per space. This fee shall be automatically increased
every firvo years by the percentage the Consumer Price Index of the City of Denver has
increased over each successive two year period." At $8,000 per parking space, the
current amount required for the Golden Peak House pay-in-lieu fee would be $120,160,
excluding the C.P.I. increase which would be calculated at the time a building permit is
requested.
Although the"existing Golden Peak House does not meet the Town's loading standard,
the proposed redevelopment for the site does not increase this nonconformity. Given
the location of the Golden Peak House, and the fact that there is no service alley or
rear vehicular access to the building, vehicular loading cannot be accommodated
directly on site. Loading for the building currently occurs at the Hanson Ranch Road
loading zones, located adjacent to the Christiania Lodge. This method of delivery is
proposed to continue.
The staff will work with the applicant on the issue of the possible formation of a special
district, concerning a central loading/delivery facility, adjacent to the Christiania Lodge.
D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town
policies and Urban Design Plans.
1. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
The Vail Village Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House, as
indicated in Sub-Area Concepts 3-2 and 3-3. Said concepts read as follows:
"#3-2 Golden Peak House
Due to this building's gross inconsistency with the Urban Design Guide
Plan and neighboring buildings, it is identified as a primary renovation
site. Relationship to greenspace on south, Seibert Circle on north, as
well as to mountain entryway, are important considerations. Loading
and delivery must be addressed."
.� 1 �-'7J �r " e':••— ' �•
, .� �� �� 'S{ •���,�'�• � '�
. �<.• �• ��
�K'`� � •t
n.;.t � , n��s7uKt�
. . +lh� �� ,�� ; �\'r� .
� ��� TRar�'' ,� ` �
� � �� ��_�0:•�3_2, �� �--;
[t�t• �����a rt,c.r.i i�� • • •�
•r
� t�cE �� t-�'� , `• .
•-- �,�,:� .
.� , •
•�. �: . � �.
�� • �,,�J�
� % --.
14
. '�� ' � �
"#3-3 Seibert Circle Studv Area
Study area to establish a more inviting public plaza with greenspace, improved
sun exposure and a focal point at the top of Bridge Street. Design and extent
of new plaza to be sensitive to fire access and circulation considerations."
, � � � l�'0• \ Cfv41�la. �� �
O 'S �lI � e
t..l. � _4 � lv� ��
.��.. �.�, ' _�_
r , . �
�+ _ � ,�•—� ••t��
�` • � ' �'�r/ \�
�= •.f �t�i10M � / '� 11R�fi41
�' .
. 1�f�� /l�S.� ��\ i� .. . •�
1 �1D0. � i 6: �
- •' ` . , �7117 - ..'.
/ :) `3�j � � �`r'�- �� /
� � .r�' ,...,1'> �
S� • i• r���� �'�'{:, .
, -�►.,�.,� i t .
. � .o..:�.<•...e' . .l
a„E v^�� —,� ! �t
��
I I n�ca �,,..J ' ;ti'�'`'.
. ' - �� .
The staff believes that the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House would
further the above sub-area concepts. Staff agrees that the renovation of this building
is needed, and we feel the proposal relates well to the Tract E open space to the
south, as well to the Seibert Circle/Bridge Street public spaces to the north. The
loading and delivery issue has been addressed in Section C above.
Additionally, the staff believes the following goals and objectives, as stated in the Vail
Village Master Plan, are relevant to this proposal:
Goal #1 - Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the
unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its
sense of community and identity.
1.2 Objective:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial
facilities.
1.3 Objective:
Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements
done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town.
2.2 Objective:
Recognize the "historic" commercial core as the main activity center of the
Village.
2.2.1 PoliCy:
The design criteria in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
shall be the primary guiding document to preserve the existing
architectural scale and character of the core area of Vail Village.
2.3 Objective:
Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight
accommodations.
15
� � �� .
2.3.1 Policy:
The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged.
Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required
to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short
term overnight rental.
2.4 Objective:
Encourage the development of a variety of a new commercial activity where
compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policy:
Commercial infill development consistent with established
horizorital zoning regulations shall be encouraged t� provide
activity generators, accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and
streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network throughout
the Village.
2.5 Objective:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing
lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
2.6 Objective:
Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of
the private sector.
2.6.1 Policy:
Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by
existing zoning. ` �
2.6.2 Policy:
Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate
restrictions so as to insure their availabiliry and affordability to the
local work force.
3.1 -Objective:
Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
3.1.1 Policy:
Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting
and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
16
. •. � �
3.4.2 Policy:
Private development projects shall be required to incorporate
new sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as
designated by the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Recreation
Trails Master Plan.
4.1.3 PoliCy:
With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural
open space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout
Vail Village shall be preserved as open space.
The staff believes that the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House would
further the above Vail Village Master Plan goals and objectives. As previously
indicated, the staff believes that the character and style of the proposed design would
be in keeping with the Town's Design Guidelines recommended for Vail Village.
The Vail Village Conceptual Building Height Plan has included the Golden Peak House
in the 3-4 story category. A building story is defined as 9 feet of height (no roof
inctuded). �
With regard to overall mass and bulk, and building height, we feel that by shifting the
mass of the fifth floor to the south, as well as the fourth floor (of the western-most
portion of the building) to the south, the pedestrian perception of the structure will be
one of a three and four story building. In addition, the grade changes approximately
one level, from north to south through the site. This site topography will also help
minimize the appearance of the structure. Overall, staff believes the project would
meet the intent of the "3-4 story building height category", acknowledging that the
building would actually be in the 4-5 story range.
2. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak
House, as indicated in Sub-Area Concepts 9 and 10. These concepts read as follows:
Concept 9 - "Commercial expansion (ground floor) not to exceed 10 feet in depth,
possible arcade. To improve pedestrian scale at base of tall building,
and for greater transparency as an activity generator on Seibert Circle.
Concept 10 - Seibert Circle. Feature area paving treatment. Relocate focal point
(potential fountain) to north for better sun exposure (fall/spring), creates
increased plaza area and are the backdrop for activities. Separated
path on north sides for unimpeded pedestrian route during delivery
periods."
17
.
_ . -.... �r., _ . _., .� _ __ _ _ _�. _. .
� .�'�,r���.—��,���(�'f��:� • �
/�"� ..�. .- l,�•��• i �•v+ '�� a-��•�` '
%/ ��� � �'�". i � .
.� �?1��k ,�i�:' :�•\� �,
� � ''� f• :\•.� ��
� . ;i-'..-�>�a :Ef, .
-���'�;�����:.. 9 .'1�
� �\` - �'\ ' .
� ;.� . �- -- . �-
� -- .
,:.,�
' �,�'��:� .
�•r .
r
^ •
As indicated earfier, the staff believes that the pedestrian arcade (which was originally
proposed over the first floor retail windows on the north elevation), and the original
ground floor plan, which does not include the curved retail windows along the eastern
portion of the building, should be added back into the design. We believe that these
modifications will bring the project into compliance with Sub-Area Concept 9 listed
above (Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan).
�u�-�rea Concept 10, Seibert Circle, is discussed below, in the Streetscape Design
section of the memo.
3. RELATED POLICIES IN THE STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN
The Streetscape Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House area as
follows:
"Seibert Circle is proposed to be replaced by a large planter that is surrounded
by low steps for informal seating. A large "specimen" evergreen tree should be
maintained in the Circle. Seibert Circle's focal point could be a fountain or an
artwork feature that will be visible from much of Bridge Street. Seibert Circle's
ability to be used as a performance site should also be considered."
"The primary paving material for the right-of-way area of the Village Core is
recommended to be rectangular concrete unit pavers, in the color mix specified
in the Guidelines for Paving section of this report. The herringbone pattern,
which is proposed for most areas, is edged by a double soiaier course. The
intent is to satisfy the need for a simple streetscape treatment without being
monotonous."
"Focal points - such as the Children's Fountain, the intersection of Bridge Street
and Gore Creek Drive and Seibert Circle - will receive special paving
treatments."
Streetscape Design Issues - The Town's Streetscape Master Plan lists numerous
improvements which are recommended to be installed adjacent to the Golden Peak
House. These improvements, some of which are described above, generally call for
the upgrading of Seibert Circle and the upgrading of the pedestrian/skier access to the
Vista Bahn ski base. Some of these improvements are directly related to the
redevelopment of the Golden Peak House and are included in the project's work plan,
however, all improvements are tied to the mitigation of the project's impacts on the
Town and the adjoining public spaces.
18
� � .
Prior to the September 27, 1993 PEC worksession, the applicant and the staff met on-
site and agreed to specific modifications regarding the projecYs landscaping and
streetscaping. The applicant's redesign would now include the following:
•Three of the existing four large evergreen trees, located in the skier access
west of the building, would be relocated onto Tract E. These trees would be
relocated north of the Pirate Ship Park area and immediately north of the
Town's recreation path. The fourth evergreen is not proposed to be relocated
because of its poor condition.
•The existing aspen located at the southwest corner of the Golden Peak House
would also be relocated onto Tract E. Due to the tree's close proximity to the
building and the configuration of the tree's root system, it may not be possible
to relocate this aspen without significant damage to the tree. The condition of
the roots will not be known until excavation of the root bal► has begun.
However, if the tree cannot be relocated, then the applicant has agreed to
install two new 3-inch caliper aspen trees onto Tract E.
•A permanent stone-faced pfanter would be added in the skier access
immediately adjacent to the western elevation of the building. The type of rock
used for this planter would match the stone that is in place in the Seibert Circle
planter, as well as the existing planters along upper Bridge Street. The planter
wall would be approximately 18-24" in height, with a stone cap, so it could be
used for seating. A 20-foot tall specimen blue spruce would be added to this
planter.
•The existing fire hydrant, which is located immediately off of the southwest
corner of the building, would be relocated into the new planter described above.
This would remove the hydrant from the pedestrian area.
•A flagstone or brick paver walkway would be added along the south side of the
Los Amigos deck to provide for pedestrian access along the south side of the
building. A 2'-6" wide planter would be added between the walkway and the
dining deck.
•The applicant has proposed to contribute $10;000.00 to the redesign and
redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The staff believes that the future redesign of
Seibert Circle needs to be very carefully studied and that a Landscape
Architect, in conjunction with the neighborhood, should analyze the design for
the Circle. In addition to the surface paver treatment, the staff believes that
landscaping, public seating and perhaps a performance area should be
provided for in the design. Drainage work around the Circle also needs to be
addressed.
The staff has reviewed the applicant's monetary proposal and we would
suggest the following. We have estimated that if the Golden Peak House were
to be required to add stone-faced planters along the north elevation of the
building, similar in design to the ptanters along upper Bridge Street, then the
19
� � .
cost of these ptanters would be substantially more than $10,000. The Town
Engineer's cost estimate for 49 lineal feet of planter along the north elevation of
the Golden Peak House is $32,000. Staff believes that this is the amount that
should be dedicated towards the redevelopment of Seibert Circle. We believe
that if the Circle were not in place, the Town would request the north elevation
planters.
In summary, the staff believes the proposed streetscape improvements would make a
positive contribution to the quality of the area and would be in compliance with the
Town's adopted Streetscape Master Plan.
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the
property on which ti�e special development district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards, or floodplain that effect this property.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features,
vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
As discussed extensively at previous PEC worksessions during late 1992 and early
1993, the staff and the PEC have expressed concerns regarding the addition of floor
area located in the "overhang and deck" easement areas. At the January 1993 PEC
worksession, the applicant had modified the redevelopment plans to remove all above-
grade floor area within the "overhang and deck" easement areas.
As currently proposed, the west "overhang & deck" easement would have
approximately 71 square feet of commercial floor area located in the easement (on the
basement, ground and second floors) and the south "overhang 8� deck" easement
would have approximately 410 square feet of GRFA (on the fourth floor), and 580
square feet of "covered" dining deck (on the second floor), located in the easement
area.
This issue was discussed at the September 13, 1993 PEC worksession and the
Commission expressed a level of comfort with the additional GRFA proposed to be
located within the easement area, with the understanding that the applicant would work
with Vail Associates regarding the dedication (of at least an equal amount, and
preferably more) of open space to the Town. Staff agrees that this amount of
encroachment into the easement area is acceptable as it has allowed for the mass of
the structure to shift out of the view corridor. It was suggested that the Mill Creek
stream tract or the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E be dedicated as permanent open
space to the Town of Vail.
In summary, although the proposed site coverage will further exceed the development
standards for the CCI zone district, the staff believes that the project's design
sensitivity to the site planning and open space issues has been positive. We find that
pedestrian access adjacent to the building will be improved and open space
maintained. Again, we do find exception with the proposal for the deck enclosure.
20
. ' •.. • .
With regard to building height, we acknowledge that the existing and proposed building
heights are over the maximum allowable height for the CCI zone district. However, we
feel the overall massing of the structure, and the configuration of the roof planes
mitigate the overage.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on
and off-site traffic circulation.
The Golden Peak House redevelopment will not impact the vehicular circulation system
surrounding this site. Staff believes that the pedestrian circulation around the
perimeter of the building will be improved as a result of the project. Improvements to
the skier access will include steps, adjacent to the southwest corner of the building,
which will tie the skier access to a new flagstone paver walkway south of the dining
deck. This area is particularly slippery and dangerous in the winter. Staff befieves that
the stair and walkway will enhance pedestrian access.
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
Landscaping issues have been discussed above in the Streetscape Design section of
the memo.
Sun/Shade Analysis - The sun/shade analysis, which is indicated on Sheet A15 in the
attached drawing set, indicates by the use of a cross-hatched pattern, the additional
shading of the public spaces north of the building during the equinox (March
21/September 21). This additional shading, consisting of approximately 112 square
feet in area, would encroach into the Seibert Circle area, as well as cast additional
shadow on Hanson Ranch Road. The proposed building design would also eliminate,
or reduce, the amount of shading on some other areas of Hanson Ranch Road and
Seibert Circle. The reduction in the amount of shading would total approximately 160
square feet.
Sheet A15 also indicates the shade and shadow line at the winter solstice (December
21). Although this analysis is not required per the Vail Village exterior alteration
criteria, staff feels it is important to understand shade impacts during the winter
solstice, as this is a peak time for our guests. Clearly, the proposed expansion of the
western portion of the Golden Peak House would increase the shade and shadow on
upper Bridge Street during this time period. Because the applicant has pulled back the
proposed fifth floor of the eastern portion of the expanded Golden Peak Fiouse, the
winter solstice shading in this area has been reduced when compared to the existing
building. However, it should be pointed out that the reduction in the amount of shading
in this area would actually reduce the shading on the roof of the commercial spaces in
the Red Lion Buitding. Some improvements will also occur with the new building when
compared to the existing shading on portions of Bridge Street and Hanson Ranch
Road.
21
� � - ' .
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and
efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development
district. �
The applicant has not proposed a phasing plan for the redevelopment of the Golden
Peak House, as it is their intention to complete the entire renovation in one phase.
V. COMMERCIAL CORE I EXTERIOR ALTERATION CRITERIA
The nine criteria (listed below) for Commercial Core I Exterior Alterations shall also be used to
judge the merits of this project. Staff believes these issues, or criteria, have already been
addressed in the SDD review criteria above, and in other parts of this memo, so we will not
reiterate and address each item here.
A. Pedestrianization - See Section IV,G.
B. Vehicular Penetration - See Section IV,G.
C. Streetscape Framework - See Section IV,D-3.
D. Street Enclosure - See Section IV,A.
E. Street Edge - See Section IV,A.
F. Building Height - See Section IV,D-2 and IV, F.
G. Views and Focal Points - See Section VIII.
H. Service and Delivery - See Section IV,C.
I. Sun/Shade - See Section IV,H.
VI. ZONE DISTRICT AMENDMENT CRITERIA
� The zone district amendment criteria (zone change) are listed below:
A. Suitability of the Proposed Zoning.
The staff is supportive of the applicant's request to modify the zoning of the "easement
areas" along the south side of the Golden Peak House building. We believe that the
request to modify the zoning from Agricultural and Open Space, to Commercial Core I,
is justified given the extent of the development currently in the easement areas. This
property is currently encumbered with an easement which allows for roof overhangs
and decks to project out over the property. Staff does not believe that this portion of
Tract E currently functions as an "open space property" and that the rezoning to
Commercial Core I, with the SDD overlay, provides the Town the opportunity to change
the zoning so that it allows for development which already exists in this area. The
SDD overlay also allows the Town to carefully review the uses in this area.
B. Is the amendment proposal presenting a convenient, workable
relationship among land uses consistent with municipal objectives?
Again, the staff believes that due to the fact that the property is encumbered with the
"overhang and deck" easements, and because the property does not currently function
22
-. � �
as an open space property, we believe that the proposed Commercial Core I zoning
� would be more in keeping with the existing uses on the site. We also do not believe
that the zone change request, for the easement portions of Tract E, would be
precedent setting. We believe this property is unique, and not like other open space
zoned properties, in that it is encumbered with easements which allow for roof
overhangs and decks to project out over the property.
C. Does the rezoning proposal provide for the growth of an orderly and
viable community?
The staff believes that the rezoning proposal would provide for the growth of an orderly
and viable community. We feel this can be accomplished by "cleaning up" an existing
situation which allows for improvements to be constructed over an open space zoned
property.
VII. MINOR SUBDIVISION CRITERIA
The minor subdivision criteria are as follows:
A. Lot Area - Chapter 18.24.090 of the Town's Municipal Code requires that the
minimum lot or site area for a property located within the CCI zone district be
5,000 square feet of buildable area.
As proposed, the new lot area of the Golden Peak House parcel would exceed
the 5,000 square foot requirement. The new lot area would be 8,375 square
feet.
B. Frontage - Chapter 18.24.090 of the Town's Municipal Code requires that each
lot have a minimum frontage of 30 feet.
The applicant is not proposing to modify the frontage of the Golden Peak
House parcel. The existing frontage is approximately 115 feet.
C. Purpose - Chapter 17.16.110 of the Vail Subdivision Regulations states that
the PEC shall review the minor subdivision application and consider its
appropriateness in regard to Town policies which relate to subdivision control,
densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions, and other
applicable documents, effects on the aesthetics of the Town, environmental
integrity and compatibility with surrounding uses.
Staff does not believe that the applicant's request for this minor subdivision
would have any negative effects upon the above-mentioned criteria. We
believe that the issues regarding aesthetics of the Town and environmental
integrity have been addressed through the SDD review criteria. In addition, we
feel that the criteria regarding compatibility with surrounding uses and densities
proposed has also been addressed.
23
� � ... '
In summary, the staff believes that the applicant has met the criteria for a minor
subdivision. In essence, this minor subdivision request would vacate the lot line
currently located between the existing Golden Peak House parcel and the "overhang
and deck" easement portions of Tract E. Should this minor subdivision be approved,
the "overhang and deck" easement portion of Tract E would be incorporated into the
Golden Peak House parcel.
VIII. VIEW CORRIDOR ENCROACHMENT CRITERIA
A. Purpose of the View Corridor Ordinance
The applicant has requested an Encroachment into View Corridor No. 1. Because the staff
believes that the original intent and purpose of the View Corridor Ordinance is very important
to the Town, we have included it here for review:
"The Town of Vail believes that preserving certain vistas is in the interest of the Town's
residents and guests. Specifically, the Town believes that:
The protection and perpetuation of certain mountain views and other significant views
from various pedestrian public ways within the Town will foster civic pride and is in the
public interest of the Town of Vail;
It is desirable to designate, preserve and perpetuate certain views for the enjoyment
and environmental enrichment of the residents and guests of the Town;
The preservation of such views will strengthen and preserve the Town's unique
environmental heritage and attributes;
The preservation of such views will enhance the aesthetic and economic vitality and
values of the Town;
The preservation of such views is intended to provide for natural light to buildings and
in public spaces in the vicinity of the view corridors;
The preservation of such views will include certain focal points such as the Clock
Tower and Rucksack Tower, which serve as prominent landmarks within Vail Village
and contribute to the community's unique sense of place."
B. Description of View Corridor Encroachments
View Corridor No. 1 is the view from the Vail Transportation Center south to the ski
mountain. The existing Golden Peak House currently encroaches into View
Corridor No. 1. The extent of the existing encroachment varies with the ridge lines,
building outline and architectural design of the building. However, the qeneraf ranqe of
encroachment is as follows:
24
• � .
. i •
•The eastern portion of the building currently encroaches approximately 1.0 to
1.1 feet into the View Corridor.
•One area of the central portion of the building encroaches approximately 12.1
feet into the View Corridor.
•The extent of the western portion's encroachment into the View Corridor
ranges from approximately 0 to 8.1 feet (at the very western edge of the
building).
As currently designed, the Golden Peak House redevelopment is proposing to
encroach into View Corridor No. 1 as follows:
•The eastern portion of the structure would encroach approximately 3 feet.
•The central portion of the redeveloped building's encroachment would range
from approximately 4 to 17 feet (elevator tower).
•The extent of the western portion's encroachment into the View Corridor would
range from approximately 9 to 13 feet. .
When reviewing the view corridor encroachment request, staff believes that it is
important to analyze, or visualize, the request in three dimensions. The proposal
would encroach further into the view corridor, versus the existing building, in some
areas. However, due to the design of the structure, with much of the upper level mass
shifted to the rear (or south), the perception of the encroachment from the public
spaces adjacent to the building, would actually be less than that of the existing
building's encroachment.
View Corridor No. 2, the view between the Golden Peak House and the Hill Building,
(skier access to Vista Bahn area) will not be impacted by the redevelopment.
C. Review Criteria for the View Corridor Encroachment
The review criteria for the View Corridor Encroachment request are as follows:
"No encroachment into an existing view corridor shall be permitted unless the applicant
demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the encroachment meets all of the
following criteria":
1. That the literal enforcement of Section 18.73.030 would preclude a
reasonable development of a proposed structure on the applicant's land.
The staff has extensively reviewed the applicant's request for an encroachment
into View Corridor#1. We have weighed the pros and cons of the request and
we should point out that, as with any view corridor encroachment request, it is
not an exact science in the determination of whether to support, or to not
support, an encroachment. There are numerous variables, and it should be
noted that the review of a view corridor encroachment is not like the review of a
request for additional density or GRFA, as one cannot simply run numbers to
determine acceptable levels. With regard to the Golden Peak House,
understanding that many of the Town's Master Plans promote the
25
� 4 : -
redevelopment of the site, and also understanding the ownership issues related
to the building, the staff believes that the strict and literal enforcement of this
section of the Town's regulations would prectude a reasonable development on
the site.
2. That the development of the structure proposed by the applicant would
not be such as to defeat the purposes of this Chapter.
The staff feels that the purpose and intent of the View Corridor Ordinance is
extremely important to the protection of certain views and vistas in the Town.
Again, we have very carefully reviewed the applicant's request to encroach into
View Corridor #1 and v�e believe that the applicant's proposal would not defeat
the purposes of this chapter, as specifically outlined above. tiNe do not believe
that the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House would negatively
effect the protection and perpetuation of View Corridor #1, nor would it
negatively effect the amount of natural light to buildings and to public spaces in
the vicinity of the structure, nor would it negatively effect or modify the views of
established focal points.
Staff believes that the project would actually open up more views, from the
Seibert Circle area, of the immediate ski runs. This is primarily due to the
removal of the butterfly roof form, which currently projects out in an east and
west direction and blocks views of the mountain.
3. That the development proposed by the appticant would not be detrimental
to the enjoyment of public pedestrian areas, public ways, public spaces,
or public views.
The staff is of the opinion that the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak
House would not be detrimental to the enjoyment of the adjacent public
pedestrian areas and public spaces and views. We feel that the applicants
have done a very good job of modifying and redesigning the building so that
views of the Riva ski run, when viewed from the Bridge Street area, would
continue to be visible. In fact, with the elimination of the existing butterfly roof,
more views of the immediate mountain would be opened up from the upper
Bridge Street and Seibert Circle areas.
4. That the development proposed by the applicant complies with the
applicable elements of the Vail Land Use Plan, Town Policies, Urban
Design Guide Plans, and other adopted master plans.
The staff believes that the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House
generally complies with the applicable elements of the above-mentioned Master
Plans. We feel that Sub-Area Concept #3-2, of the.Vail Village Master Plan, is
applicable to this criteria. This concept identifies the "building's gross
inconsistency with the Urban Design Guide Plan and neighboring buildings, and
has identified it as a primary renovation site." Staff agrees that the Golden
Peak House building is unique, due to its degree of nonconformance. We
26
•~' • � �
believe that the fact that this project is specifically called out as a prime site for
redevelopment and our opinion that the new design brings the project into more
conformance with the Village Design Guidelines serves to distinguish this
proposal from other future view corridor encroachment requests.
In summary, we feel that the projecYs relationship to the Comprehensive Plan
issues have been discussed in depth under the SDD review criteria listed
above.
5. That the proposed structure will not diminish the integrity or quality nor
compromise the'original purpose of the preserved view.
The original purpose of View Corridor #1, with its vantage point located at the
central stairway of the Village Transportation Center, is to frame the Rucksack
and Clock Tower, with the mountain and ski area located behind the Town.
From the viewpoint, the Golden Peak House is nearly imperceptible. In the
staff's opinion, the proposed modifications to View Corridor #1, as viewed from
the viewpoint, would not diminish the integriry or quality, nor compromise the
original purpose of this preserved view. As specifically stated in the View
Corridor Ordinance, "the purpose of Viewpoint #1 is to protect the views of Vail
Mountain, views of Vail Village, and to maintain the prominence and views of
the Clock Tower and Rucksack Tower as seen from the central staircase of the
Transportation Center."
IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends approval of the applicant's requests. These requests include a
request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a request for a Commercial
Core I exterior alteration, a request to encroach into View Corridor No. 1, a request for a
rezoning and a request for a minor subdivision. We find that the redevelopment proposal,
over the course of 11 PEC work sessions and approximately 2 years of review, has developed
into one which is in compfiance with the objectives and purpose section of the SDD zone
district as well as the other Comprehensive Plan elements described in detail above. The
staff's recommendation of approval is based on our understanding that the following are
included in the redevelopment:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment
project, the developer will provide two off-site, two-bedroom, permanently
restricted employee housing units. Each unit shall be a minimum of 700 square
feet in size. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance
requirements.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the developer will deed restrict two three-bedroom
dwelling units (Units 201 and 401) to be included in the Golden Peak House
short-term rental pool, at all times when they are not occupied by the owner or
his guests.
27
� � 'y. .-
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the developer will contribute $10,000.00 towards the
redesign and redevelopment of Seibert Circle.
4. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant, or Vail Associates (co-applicant), will
dedicate open space to the Town. It was agreed that the open space area
would be an equivalent amount, when compared to the amount of floor area
proposed to be located in the "overhang and deck" easements. It was
suggested that the Mill Creek stream tract or the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract
E be dedicated as permanent open space.
The staff's recommendation for approval does not include the applicanYs request to add a
retractable enclosure over a portion of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck. We believe that
the applicants have done a very good job of redesigr�ing the building to reduce the mass and
bulk and we feel that this enclosure, over approximately one-half of the outdoor dining deck,
would only add to the mass and bulk of the structure. Further, we strongly believe that an
outdoor dining experience is what many visitors to Vail desire, and we seriously question the
use of a retractable cover and enclosure in respect to the Design Criteria for CCI.
In addition to the above, the staff recommendation for approval carries with it the following
conditions:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant agree to restrict, and place into the
short-term rental pool, the lock-offs associated with Units 305 and 306.
2. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor
retail windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan,
which does not include the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of
the building, be added back into the design.
3. That the applicant further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights.
4. That the applicant lower the roof form over the main entry.
5. That the applicant ut�ize a shake roof on the building.
6. That the applicant contribute a total of $32,000 towards the redevelopment of
Seibert Circle.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant restrict the two new accommodation
units, so that in the future, they cannot be converted into dwelling units via the
Condominium Conversion section of the Subdivision Regulations.
c:\pecUnemosk�o Idpeak.fin
2$
� ' ' ' � �
Golden Peak House
Square Footaae Analvsis
Existing Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA Office
Basement Level: 1,932 2,460 0 0
Ground Floor: 3,963 1,237 0 292
Second Floor: 1,301 1,332 2,466 168
Third Floor: 0 1,480 3,749 0
Fourth Floor: 0 118 2,743 0
Totals: 7,196 6,627 8,958 460
Total square footage (gross area) = 23,241 sq. ft.
Proposed Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA Office
Basement Level: 5,270 1,652 0 122
Ground Floor: 6,094 993 0 0
Second Floor: 2,667 1,358 2,577 0 .
Third Floor: 0 765 5,272 0
Fourth Fioor: 0 626 5,243 0
Fifth Floor: 0 42 2,763 0
Totals: 14,031 5,436 15,855 122
Total square footage (gross area) = 35,444 sq. ft.
29
� � .. �
Golden Peak House
Dwellinq Unit Analysis
Existinq:
DU AU
Basement Level: 0 0
Ground Floor: 0 0
Second Floor: 8 0
Third Floor: 8 0
Fourth Floor: 2 0
Totals: 18 0 = 18 DUs
Proq�sed:
DU AU Lock-off
Basement Level 0 0 0
Ground Floor: 0 0 0
Second Floor: 3 0 1
Third Floor: 6 2 2
Fourth Floor: 4 0 0
Fifth Floor: 1 0 0
Totals: 14 2 3
Note: 2 Aus = 1 DU Total DUs = 15
30
• . -
. � � �
Goiden Peak House
Parkinq/Loadinq Analysis
Existing Conditions - Required
Parkinq Spaces Loadinq Berths
Retail Commercial/Restaurant 23.25 1
Residential 30.00 1
Office 1.84 0
TOTALS: 55.09 2 (minus 1 for multiple use credit)=1 berth
required
Proposed Conditions - Required
Parkinq Spaces Loadina Berths
Retail Commercial/Restaurant 41.699 1
Residential 27.923 1
Office 0.488 0
TOTALS: 70.11 2 (minus 1 for multiple use credit)=1 berth
required
31
; . � ,, .
� ' � �
3 "
3 � � � .. .
.
: 1 1 � � �
� 1 �- -___ -
\ � ��'-'�`
� � � ,���� � 1
\ �� �� � 1 � ���
� �_` �
1 r � "..E� �:� `\ ��{ �
1 3t� . r.
�� �\ � � I \. ; �a� o
1 � � �� � � �
I �� �a � ,� �i Z.
0
i ' � � .
�� ` � ��
1 . R � � \, i�i'
� �--� ��\ ��3 � �� j --�
_ `�� �°� � � �3 �a . � � �_ $ � � /
-- -- --� \— ��= (��� �I o ` -
� � �
-\�� N\ -\��t,� �3� . � �- -�
��-rr �l
��Y�'-i' ?�. � ''S �..i �
�� � S.Ziy � � -' � +C - . �, �� \�
^ a ���� - �� �
�: � i � r
�� 0 i � az
� �
� � �� �€i �� �;� �
� �� � \� ��� � ��� #�� � .
� t'� .-F ���E s (
� �3 } ;��� � r� .
C�, � ~ �� '� �J� � � � ''
� z,.
� \ � �� --- � g �- i . \ o , �
'L �
m �
\ � F i 6 � \ ' � �y
�— �}�.. z
—v r • �I� �1 I ,n o \� .. * 's
_-- — ����� ��� � �� � � > � � � � .� o m
��I �} 3x� � � _ ° � �a p °.
uT14 ;� I \+d'\ � T a � O ' �{�� � . � O
IWtrl T a+ � y �II �`� ' ,� . 2 Z�
�\ ��"�j I m ��� � � �� � =i
� I �� ��\� �� ;
�—�� � I :
\ � � � � � � � lp . . �
� \ �� �� �� �?
\ \ A
� �� \ � ��� �_
� ��\ � 1 ° �
r�l
/ \ \ . � � ��
'�\ H�� �`� � `� � \ •. ��, '�/� � `
< . �
>
_� _�_ \\ � 3� � \ � ��� � o
\ ]p
� � O a?
� ` �\-y �\� o � �.\\ � (Z =
/ �3 �� ��� �_* �� � � '�� � �.
a� ��'�� � �`� � \� \�k- �� ; �
a, � � D \� r� /
� � � \ \ �� � �
i�� � �' �' � � � ��i r . �.�.
8?� � m' � ', �\
Z �,
.
s' � :� � I �' \,
o�� � • > 3� .
: ' - Z , #
�� � , � �
� i a a}
� o I ��
i ��
� �� .
�°"""�" °102 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL s"°"'°°"."°"°°""'."°""`°�'
� ��,.�.a» �,.,.m,
i o.r 9/29/93 � . •+uabo n<+
VAIL , COLORADO.
: , . � �
:t. �.
MEMORANDUM �,�
TO. Planning and Environmental Commission � ¢� �
�.:.�r:���,
FROM: Community Development Department 6�
DATE: December 7, 1992 - updated on January 11, 1993 (All changes are
indicated in bold type).
SUBJECT: An update on the establishment of a Special Development District, a
Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor subdivision request, a
zone change request and a request for an encroachment into View Corridor No.
1 for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch
Road/Lots A, B and C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
_ _ ___. _ ___ _ __.___ ...... _.... __ _ ___ .. ... .._ __ . .._.....
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ... ........ . . __ _ ___ _ _ _
_. _ _ _ __ __ __ _ ___.... __ _ .__........__...._ __ _ __ ....._ _ _ __ _ __
___ _ _ _. .__ _ _ __ _.......__.. _ _ __ _ _. _ __ _
_ __ _ __ __ _ ___ ____ ____ . _..... _ _ _ _ _ ___ __
_ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _ _. _ _. __. _ _ __.. .. __ _ _
__ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
_ _ _ __ _ __ _. ___.... __ _ .... _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _
_..._ __ _ _ ___ ___ ____ ___ _ _._. _ __ __. _ __ __ . _
_........ __ _ ___ __ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ ____ _..._ _ _ _ _._ . ....
___ __ _ __ __ ___ __. . ___ _ . . . __ _ __.. _ __ ___ __ ....
___ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _. __ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ ._....
____ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ ___ _____ ____ _ __ _... ..
_ __ _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ . _ _.__ _.
_ _ _ ____ __ _. _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __.. ___........
__. __ _ _ _ ___ __ . ..... .. _ __ _ _ _ _ ___. ...
___ __ __ _ _ __ _ ___ _ __ __ _ ._ __ . . _ ... __ _.. .... ...
_......_._.. .. __ _ _ _ _ _. _ __ ._ _.. __ _. _....... _
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ ____ _ _ ___ . __._ ___ __. .._
I. PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The intent of this work session is to continue discussions between the Planning and
Environmental Commission, the staff and the applicants with regard to the redevelopment of
the Golden Peak House. Since the previous work session (December 14, 1992), the
applicants have modified the Golden Peak House redevelopment proposal and the staff
has again analyzed the proposal with regard to the Town's development standards
(zoning issues). Specific modifications to the project include the following:
- The removal of most of the floor area in the "overhang & deck" easements;
- The overall reduction of approximately 1500 square feet of floor area;
- The reduction in the size of the fifth floor (from 3,222 sq. ft. of GRFA to 2,780
sq. ft.) This floor has also been reconfigured and pulled back from the north
elevation (Bridge Street) approximately 9-12 feet.
To summarize the requests, the Community Development Department has received the
following applications concerning the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House:
1. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District;
2. A request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration;
3. A request to encroach into View Corridor No. 1;
1
' � �
4. A request to rezone a portion of Tract E (from Agricultural and Open Space to
Commercial Core I); and
5. A request for a minor subdivision, to incorporate the rezoned Tract E parcel into
the Golden Peak House parcel and to incorporate a portion of Lot C into the
Golden Peak House parcel.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS
The Golden Peak House was originally constructed in 1966, and since that time there have
been only minor, cosmetic modifications made to the exterior of the structure. Generally, this
proposed redevelopment for the Golden Peak House includes a renovation of the entire
building. The architectural modifications include sloped roof forms, flat roof forms, the addition
of dormers, balconies, bay windows, and other architectural projections. Such modifications
include the addition of a new fourth floor (on the western end of the structure) and the addition
of a new fifth floor (on the eastern end). The entire existing "butterfly" roof form would be
removed, and gable roofs added. The proposed gable roof forms would have a 3:12 pitch.
Modifications proposed for the exterior of the structure will also facilitate the improvement, and
more efficient use, of the interior spaces. The existing center area of the building, commonly
called an arcade and generally used as common area/circulation, is not a very efficient use of
this interior space. With the redevelopment, the applicant is proposing to infill this entire
arcade area and to add a full basement beneath the structure. The common areas of the
building would be better defined to allow for a more efficient circulation system throughout the
structure. Additional retail/commercial space would be added to the building. Specifically, at-
grade retail shops are proposed along the north and west elevations. Restaurant space would
continue to be provided on the second floor of the western portion of the building.
There are currently 18 dwelling units (and 0 accommodation units) located in the building.
The redevelopment proposal calls for 16 dwelling units (2 with lock-offs) and 2
accommodation units, for a total of 17 dwelling units (2 accommodation units = 1
dwelling unit).
The entire structure would be brought into compliance with all the current Building and Fire
Codes, (the building would be fully sprinkled).
General site improvements, around the perimeter of the Golden Peak House, would include
the following:
1. A concrete unit paver walkway and covered arcade would be added along the
northern side of the structure.
2. The existing trash enclosures, currently located along the west elevation of the
building, would be relocated into the basement of the Golden Peak House. The
redesign calls for a trash compactor to be located in the basement of the
building and a small elevator would be added to transport the refuse up to the
2
� � � ' .
first floor when trash pick-ups are scheduled. This would occur at the northeast
corner of the building.
3. The applicant has indicated a willingness to fund some portion of the
streetscape modifications to the Seibert Circle area. Such modifications
could bring Seibert Circle into conformance with the recommendations of the
Streetscape Master Plan.
4. The applicant has also indicated a willingness to fund some
improvements to the pedestrian walkway/skier access-way located
between Seibert Circle and the Vista Bahn ski base. Such improvements
could include the addition of landscaping, drainage modifications and the
addition of concrete unit pavers. Due to land ownership issues, cooperation
from adjacent property owners would be necessary.
5. The applicant is proposing to construct an expanded outdoor dining deck, at-
grade, on the south side of the Golden Peak House. This dining deck would be
located upon Tract E and would require the modification of the Vail Village 5th
Filing Protective Covenants to allow this use. Additionally, the Los Amigos
Restaurant is proposing to enclose the existing outdoor deck area to the south
of the building. This deck area is currently located upon Tract E (within the
"overhang & deck" easements), which is not zoned for such use. However, the
proposaf calls for this portion of Tract E to be rezoned, and through a minor
subdivision, incorporated into the Golden Peak House parcel. Further
discussion of the issues regarding Tract E follows in Section IX of this
memorandum.
6. It is proposed that the five existing evergreens, located along the western
elevation of the building, be relocated south of the building, onto Tract E.
Because construction of the building would not be possible without
severely damaging the existing evergreen trees, the applicant has agreed
to replace these trees with large specimen trees.
3
, • ' � ..rv'
ill. GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ZONING ANALYSIS
The project's departures from the CCI zone district standards are highlighted in bold type.
UNDERLYING ZONING: EXISTING PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL CORE I PROJECT SDD
Site Area:' 8,338 sq. ft. Same Same
Setbacks: Per the Vail Village N: 0-6 ft. N: 0-3 ft.
Urban Design Guide Plan W: 3-12 ft. W: 0-11 ft.
S: 6-14 ft. S: 0-10 ft.
E: 0.5-1.5 ft. E: 0-1.5 ft.
Height: 60%: 33 ft. or less East: 46 ft. max. East: 49 ft. max.
40%: 33 ft. - 43 ft. West: 36 ft. max. West: 42 ft. max.
Common Area: 2,334 sq. ft or 6,627 sq. ft. or 99% 5,902 sq. ft. or 88%
35%of allowable GRFA -2,334 sq. ft. or 35% - 2,334 sq. ft. or 35%
4,293 sq. ft. added to GRFA 3,568 sq. ft.- added to GRFA
GRFA: 6,670 sq. ft. or 80% 8,958 sq. ft. 16,063 sq. ft.
+ 4,293 sq. ft. (excess common) +3,568 sq. ft. (excess common area)
13,251 sq. ft. or 159% 19,631 sq. ft. or 235%
Units: 25 units per acre, or 18 units 17 units
4.8 units for the site. (16 DU and 2 AU)
Site Coverage: 6,670 sq. ft. 6,345 sq. ft." 7,868 sq.ft."
or 80% or 76% or 94%
Landscaping: Per the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan
Parking: Per Town of Vail Required: 55 Required: 71
parking standards
Loading: Per Town of Vail Required: 1 Required: t
loading standards Existing: 0 Proposed:0
Commercial Uses: N/A 7,196 sq. ft 13,239 sq. ft.
Gross Floor Area: N/A 23,241 sq. ft. 35,322 sq. ft.
' All of the above development statistics, including the setbacks, have been calculated by staff and
are based on the applicant's proposed new lot area of 8,338 square feet. This lot area assumes the
incorporation of portions of Tract E and Lot C into the Golden Peak House parcel. The existing
Golden Peak House lot area is 0.159 acres, or 6,926 sq. ft. The new areas (portions of Tract E and
Lot C) proposed to be included into the Golden Peak House parcel consist of 1,412 sq. ft, for a total
of 8,338 sq. ft.
*' Includes areas off-site (in the "overhang and deck" easements).
4
� �
IV. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
1) November 25, 1991 - initial PEC work session.
2) January 13, 1992 - PEC update on the status of the project.
3) January 27, 1992 - PEC work session.
4) October 26, 1992 - PEC work session.
5) November 23, 1992- PEC site visit to review building staking.
6) November 24, 1992 - Council denied request to proceed through the
planning process. The request included floor area (commercial and GRFA) to
be constructed into the public right-of-way.
7) December 7, 1992 - PEC work session.
8) December 14, 1992 -PEC work session.
V. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the purpose of Special Development Districts is to:
"The purpose of the special development district is to encourage
flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its
most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of
new development within the town; to facilitate the adequate and
economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and
scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of
the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved
development plan for a special development district, in conjunction with
a property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for
guiding development and uses of property included in the special
development district."
1) Although the staff will not specifically address each of the nine SDD review
criteria for this worksession, the criteria are listed below.
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
� neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural
design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity,
character, visual integrity and orientation.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in
Chapter 18.52.
D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehenslve
Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plans.
5
� �
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that
affect the property on which the special development district is
proposed.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and
sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overail aesthetic
quality of the community.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off-site traffic circulation.
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to
optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and
functions.
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that wiil maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of
the special development district.
2� The nine criteria for Commercial Core I exterior alterations shall also be used to
judge the merits of this project. The nine criteria are listed below:
A. Pedestrianization
B. Vehicular Penetration
C. Streetscape Framework
D. Street Enclosure
E. Street Edge
F. Buiiding Height
G. Views and Focal Points
H. Service and Delivery
t. Sun/Shade
6
� 4
3) The zone district amendment criteria (zone change) are listed below:
A. Suitability of the Proposed Zoning.
B. Is the amendment proposal presenting a convenient, workable
relationship among land uses consistent with municipai
objectives?
C. Does the rezoning proposal provide for the growth of an orderly
and viable community?
4) The minor subdivision criteria are as follows:
A. Lot Area - Chapter 18.24.090 of the Town's Municipal Code requires
that the minimum lot or site area for a property located within the CCI
zone district be 5,000 square feet of buildable area.
B. Frontage - Chapter 18.24.090 of the Town's Municipal Code requires
that each lot have a minimum frontage of 30 feet.
5) The review criteria for the view corridor encroachment request are as follows:
No encroachment into an existing view corridor shall be permitted unless the
applicant demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the
encroachment meets all of the following criteria:
A. That the literal enforcement of Section 18.73.030 would preclude a
reasonable development of a proposed structure on the applicant's land.
B. That the development of the structure proposed by the applicant would
not be such as to defeat the purposes of this Chapter.
C. That the development proposed by the applicant would not be
detrimental to the enjoyment of public pedestrian areas, public ways,
public spaces, or public views.
D. That the development proposed by the applican# complies with
applicable elements of the Vail Land Use Plan, Town Policies, Urban
Design Guide Plans, and other adopted master plans.
E. That the proposed structure will not diminish the integrity or quality nor
compromise the original purpose of the preserved view.
7
� � � • a
VI. REIATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
The Vaii Viilage Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House, as
indicated in Sub-Area Concepts 3-2 and 3-3. Said concepts read as follows:
"#3-2 Goiden Peak House
Due to this building's gross inconsistency with the Urban Design Guide
Plan and neighboring buildings, it is identified as a primary renovation
site. Relationship to greenspace on south, Seibert Circle on north, as
well as to mountain entryway, are important considerations. Loading
and delivery must be addressed."
.� , �� -� -��-- �1��'��!.
, `: '' '
, -' I � .✓�• •'!-'�. `
. �, \,�
�i.
• Ra�ar /C , n�ifruyia
n�:.,� •��j
a��a. � _r \\J-`\
, � •1 ir
. �v .. - � �_ �� �f�
�' reaw -
> a� '��
�::"�1 1
o���3_2` �.�.:1. :
' MtLI�1D6. �('{' . .
� lDt�K�S wfrf •:" •• '!
E►A7 `,! • . �
= LACE � �' • ��,,..�.t .
�'' �
'`- •'t ` �,.
^'� ' } �
.•. \ �
"#3-3 Seibert Circle Studv Area
Study area to establish a more inviting public plaza with greenspace,
improved sun exposure and a focal point at the top of Bridge Street.
Design and extent of new plaza to be sensitive to fire access and
circulation considerations."
� ILDC/�� 'z ' � � .
( . .
�(�CD / . • � .�� "—'
�00! ,,, a(�r(�/ "I..•� �•••J��i
.00- L •�y0. � 1^J�.•
.�
• v CIOCR • •�l l�w��OVf[7
T TO•U � �J� f�'��� 1
,�TUC ��oa. = i� �-I � � 1 �
Y�w�Y�l �1 .. �'!� � , 1
� I �
r'__ �'j ' --
.
:
�. ���`��"�.����:«. )�" ,
uwo■ � CN�T now r
+wt��n I e
�..,MO `�3- 11�' �: .;_
.ti�. .
�° , - `� 1��;� ����
�[0 lqM j nMifU♦
�•" ' C �
''�. iica �.\ � �.' E. ; �
••1 �111+ `_ ..?'
��.3 , �=- ,� �
� �� �r� .,..1=; .
� r y•
S^� • (�. ��� `:.1�{:. .
` a�.�ce�� • .(t .
.-'1' ' .
. � �E vMt \ • io�.n=a i� � .\ �
�f1ACE l L•J �• 7•• ���\ .•
��\ .� � ' (��� �
. _ .� .
�r � ' .
Additionally, the staff believes the following goals and objectives, as stated in the Vail
Village Master Plan, are relevant to this proposal:
Goal #1 - Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and identity.
12 Objective:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial
facilities.
1.3 Objective:
Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements
done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town.
2.2 Objective:
Recognize the "historic" commercial core as the main activity center of the
Village.
2.2.1 Policy:
The design criteria in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
shall be the primary guiding document to preserve the existing
architectural scale and character of the core area of Vail Village.
2.3 Objective:
Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight
accommodations.
2.3.1 Policy:
The development of short term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing
density levels are required to be designed or managed in a
manner that makes them available for short term overnight
rental.
2.4 Objective:
Encourage the development of a variety of a new commercial activity where
compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policy:
Commercial infill development consistent with established
horizontal zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide
activity generators, accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and
streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network throughout
the Village.
2.5 Objective:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing
9
� • •
lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
2.6 Objective:
Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of
the private sector.
2.6.1 Policy:
Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by
existing zoning.
2.6.2 Policy:
Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate
restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the
local work force.
3.1 Objective:
Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
3.1.1 Policy:
Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting
and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
3.4.2 Policy:
Private development projects shall be required to incorporate
new sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as
designated by the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Recreation
Trails Master Plan.
4.1.3 Policy:
With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural
open space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout
Vail Village shall be preserved as open space.
The Vail Village Conceptual Building Height Plan has included the Golden Peak House
in the 3-4 story category. A building story is defined as 9 feet of height (no roof
included).
VII. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak
House, as indicated in Sub-Area Concepts 9 and 10. Said concepts read as follows:
10
� `„�' . ' .
Concept 9 - "Commercial expansion (ground floor) not to exceed 10 feet in depth,
possible arcade. To improve pedestrian scale at base of tall building,
and for greater transparency as an activiry generator on Seibert Circle.
Concept 10 - Seibert Circle. Feature area paving treatment. Relocate focal point
(potential fountain) to north for better sun exposure (fall/spring), creates
increased plaza area and are the backdrop for activities. Separated
path on north sides for unimpeded pedestrian route during delivery
periods."
� � ' � ��/ •
� �� �r •r•� ' .
�. j^�."��N ••'
� �� � g:� .
� ���>>. .\���.�.�•.��•�� ��
\.. .\ •,
� . .�'�, ,
";i>>:��aE%� �
\ =���;:�,��`;\f g .�1�
/
� :;� - • ... . �_
� .,..a.� ''
, =:.-
.�..
� .
VIII. RELATED POLICIES IN THE STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN
The Streetscape Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House area as
follows:
"Seibert Circle is proposed to be replaced by a large planter that is surrounded by low
steps for informal seating. A large "specimen" evergreen tree should be maintained in
the Circle. Seibert Circle's focal point could be a fountain or an artwork feature that
will be visible from much of Bridge Street. One theme currently being discussed is a
public art project honoring the 10th Mountain Division. Seibert Circle's ability to be
used as a performance site should also be considered."
"The primary paving material for the right-of-way area of the Village Core is
� recommended to be rectangular concrete unit pavers, in the color mix specified in the
Guidelines for Paving section of this report. The herringbone pattern, which is
proposed for most areas, is edged by a double soldier course. The intent is to satisfy
the need for a simple streetscape treatment without being monotonous."
"Focal points - such as the Children's Fountain, the intersection of Bridge Street and
Gore Creek Drive and Seibert Circle - will receive special paving treatments."
11
" • �
IX. DISCUSSION ISSUES
Since this is a work session, there is no formal staff recommendation at this time.
However, the staff has identified the following issues, which we would like to discuss
further with the PEC and applicants:
1. The proposed encroachment into View Corridor No. 1. - Both the eastern
and western portions of the existing Golden Peak House currently
encroach into View Corridor No. 1. The eastern portion currentty
encroaches approximately 8 inches into the View Corridor. The extent of
the western portion's encroachment into the View Corridor has not been
determined at this time. View Corridor No. 1 is the view from the Vail
Transportation Center south to the ski mountain. The Golden Peak House
redevelopment is proposing to encroach into this View Corridor approximately 6
feet-2 inches with the eastern portion of the structure. This figure includes
the current 8 inch encroachment. The encroachment is visible from the
Transportation Center. The effect of the encroachment begins to become more
noticeable from the intersection of Gore Creek Drive and Bridge Street. As one
moves from this intersection south towards the Golden Peak House, it becomes
apparent that the redevelopment would impact the views towards the mountain
(i.e. Riva Ridge ski run). This view from Bridge Street, although not a formally
adopted view corridor, was identified by the PEC at a previous work session as
being a very important view in the Village.
At this time, it is the staff's understanding that the applicants have hired
Eagle Valley Surveying to determine the extent of the existing
encroachments, for both the western and the eastern portions of the
Golden Peak House, into View Corridor No 1. This information should be
available prior to the next PEC hearing on this application.
2. The project's departures from the Commercial Core I Zone District
standards, which are specifically listed in the Zoning Analysis section of this
memorandum and are as follows:
a. Building height
b. GRFA
c. Common area
d. Dwelling unit count
e. Site coverage
f. Loading berths
3. The Tract E issue. The applicant is currently negotiating with Vail Associates
for the acquisition of portions of Tract E (to the south) and Lot C (to the west).
The applicants (including Vail Associates, as co-applicant), have requested a
zone change amendment for the portions of Tract E described above. Tract E
is currently zoned Agricultural and Open Space. The portions of Tract E
12
� � ' .
proposed to be rezoned generally include those areas which are labeled as
Easement #1 and Easement #2 on the attached survey. As the owner of Tract
E, Vail Associates has previously granted easements to the Golden Peak
House to ailow for specific encroachments, such as roof overhangs and
balconies, in the area of Easement Nos. 1 and 2. These encroachments are
considered legal, non-conforming uses within the Agriculturat and Open Space
Zone District, and as such, all legal, non-conforming uses cannot be enlarged
or expanded, and if modified, they must be brought into full compliance with the
zoning code. In order to allow for building modifications in the easement areas,
and to be in full compliance with the zoning code, the applicants are proposing
the following:
-Rezone the easement areas from Agr/Open Space to CCI.
-Minor subdivision to incorporate the easement areas into the Golden
Peak House parcel. The protective covenants governing Tract E will
need to be modified to reflect a change in the Tract E boundary.
-SDD overlay on entire Golden Peak House parcel.
4. Los Amigos Deck - Ron Riley, as one of the co-applicants, would like to
include an outdoor dining deck on Tract E, which is currently zoned Agricultural
and Open Space. The conceptual design for the proposed deck calls for an
expansion of the deck approximately 14 feet from the southern face of the
existing outdoor deck and approximately 80 feet long. This request will require
a zone district amendment. The applicant is considering several possible
rezoning options to allow for the deck. These include:
A. Rezoning the area for the deck to Commercial Core I zoning. A deck is
a conditional use in this district.
B. Rezoning the area for the deck to Ski Base Recreation II, which would
involve the creation of a new zone district that has limited ski base uses.
A deck would be listed as a conditional use.
C. Amending the Agricultural and Open Space District to include outdoor
dining decks associated with ski base areas as a conditional use.
The applicants are now proposing to enclose a portion of the existing
outdoor dining deck, with a "greenhouse" type enclosure. The size of the
enclosed restaurant space would be approximately 8' wide, by 50' in
length, for a total of 400 square feet. This enclosure would be located in
the existing "overhang & deck" easement. Because of the timing of this
change to the project, this enclosure has not been included in any of the
development standards.
Additionally, it is the staff's understanding that Ron Riley will be
proposing to add an at-grade, outdoor dining deck, whfch would extend
south from the proposed greenhouse enclosure, into Tract E. At this time
no formal application for the review of this deck has been submitted to
the Town. It is the staff's understanding that the applicant intends to
request to rezone a portion of Tract E to the Commercial Core I zone
13
� �
district and to include a deed restriction to insure the land is only used
for an at-grade outdoor dining deck.
5. Architectural Design Issues - The following comments should be reviewed in
conjunction with the proposed elevation drawings for the Golden Peak House.
The letters (A, B, C etc.) on each elevation correspond with the comments
discussed below. In general, staff believes that the overall architectural style is
positive and is compatible with the alpine character of the Village. The
applicant has responded with revised drawings since the last work
session, and the staff's comments on these revisions follow in bold type.
The applicant has not yet provided staff with a revised model to analyze
the design modifications.
NORTH ELEVATION
A. The proposed second floor Los Amigos restaurant expansion, on the
north side of the west building, will be removed from this application, as
the encroachment into the Town right-of-way was not approved by Town
Council on November 24, 1992. The revised facade for this area will
incorporate stucco, with windows similar to those proposed on the west
elevation of the restaurant.
In response, the applicant has removed the second floor restaurant
expansion on the north side of the building. In addition, stucco
has been incorporated into this portion of the building facade as
well as windows similar to those proposed on the west elevation of
the restaurant.
B. The central connection between the east and west halves of the building
should be cut back to the east, and roof forms should be simplified and
lowered. The hot tub located on the flat roof of this central connection
should be relocated to the south side of the fifth floor addition, to a less
visible location.
In response, the applicant has made changes to this portion of the
building. However, without the use of a massing model, it is
difficult to determine if the building mass has been decreased in
this area. It appears as though the hot tub is no longer located on
the roof of this central connection.
C. Where applicable, flat roofs should be modified to pitched roofs, similar
to the roof forms utilized at the Sonnenalp and Christiania. These roofs
should have a truncated peak instead of the traditional ridge peak. One
example of this would be to move the existing pitched roof to the east
end of the building and extend a gable form perpendicular to this ridge.
Other variations are also possible - the idea is to remove the flat roofs
which are prominent from the Bridge Street vantage point {and from the
ski mountain) and do not comply with the Urban Design Criteria for the
14
� �
Village. It will be necessary to view the model at the work session to
explain this concept further.
In response, the applicant has removed all the visible flat roofs and
replaced them with truncated ridge peaks, similar to those roof
forms utilized at the Sonnenalp and Christiania.
D. The fifth floor building mass should be pulled back to the south away
from Seibert Circle as much as possible to provide relief on the north
facade.
In response, the applicant has pulled back the fifth floor building
mass approximately 9 to 12 feet away from Seibert Circle and has
reduced the size of the proposed fifth floor to 2,780 square feet of
GRFA, from the previously proposed 3,222 square feet of GRFA (a
reduction of 442 square feet of GRFA). In addition, the applicant
has added three dormers on the north elevation of the fifth floor, to
provide architectural relief for this portion of the building.
E. The first floor arcade needs refinement to create more of a pedestrian
area. Suggestions include:
1. Delineating the roof of the arcade to break up the height of the
facade;
2. Opening up the access through the east end of the arcade;
3. Embellishing the design of the windows and doors through
interesting detailing, such as smaller window panes, "grand"
entry doors, etc.;
4. Lowering the roof form over the entry.
In response, the applicant has opened up pedestrian access
through the east end of the arcade. Items 1, 3, and 4 above appear
to work better with the revised building design.
EAST ELEVATION
A. The peaked roof form that is built into the facade to conceal the flat roof
behind it should be redesigned. Architectural detailing is essential to
this elevation to break up the massing of this facade. It cannot be
assumed that the Cyranos Building will redevelop and screen this
elevation.
In response, the applicant has redesigned the roof forms and has
eliminated all visible flat roofs as discussed above. The
architectural detailing of the east facade is still of concern to the
staff.
15
" . • •
WEST ELEVATION
A. The third and fourth level projections (floor area) should be decreased in
size to diminish the "canyon" effect through this important gateway to
the ski mountain. Perhaps railings could extend in front of the projection
to help break up the building mass.
In response, the applicant has decreased the size and floor area of
the third and fourth floor projections. A small area of floors 1 and
2 (Los Amigos Restaurant) continue to project into Lot C (on the
west elevation); all other floor area has been removed from Lot C.
B. The large trees (approximately 5) adjacent to the existing building
should be preserved. Landscaping in this corridor is critical, as it is a
transition area between the Village and the ski mountain.
In response, the applicant has agreed to relocate the five
evergreens onto Tract E and has agreed to replace these
evergreens with several new trees in the corridor. The staff still
believes that landscaping in this corridor is critical and would like
to see the applicant address this issue further.
C. Entry into the Vail Associates commercial space on the south side of the
building (under the Los Amigos deck) needs to be more accessible and
inviting. The staff's suggestion is to pull back the entry to the east to
create more space in front of the door. This would take away some
deck area on the floor above.
In response, the applicant has pulled back the entry to the Vail
Associates commercial space below the deck to create more space
in front of the door.
D. The first floor retail windows need smaller panes to create a more
pedestrian scale.
The applicant would like to maintain these windows as display
windows, and therefore does not desire to modify them by adding
smaller window panes.
E. Landscaping, pavers, and lighting should be carried through this
gateway to the mountain.
The applicant has not addressed this issue at this time, although
there is a willingness to participate in this improvement.
16
�r �.I' '
SOUTH ELEVATION
A. The flat roof connections should be integrated into the existing pitched
roof forms. The greenhouse on the east side of the fifth floor is
somewhat of a "foreign" architectural element in the Village and should
be made more consistent with the alpine character of Vail.
In response, the flat roof connections have been integrated into the
existing pitched roof forms, and the "greenhouse" discussed above
has been eliminated from the fifth floor.
B. The Los Amigos outdoor dining deck is proposed to have structure
located above it, which is a concern because the deck would no tonger
have as much sun exposure. The resolution of the additional deck
request on Tract E will directly relate to this issue.
In response, the floor area proposed above the existing outdoor
dining deck has been pulled back and is no longer within the
"overhang and deck" easement area. The commercial area below
the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck is the only remaining floor
area proposed to be located within the easement area (Tract E),
with the exception of Ron Riley's proposed "greenhouse"
enclosure of approximately 400 square feet.
C. Some of the roofs over south facing balconies could be cut back to help
decrease the mass and bulk of the building.
In response, the applicant has cut back the roofs above these
decks.
D. Landscaping along this elevation needs to be addressed.
With the exception of the five transplanted evergreen trees onto
Tract E, from the skier access corridor, landscaping along this
building elevation has not been addressed.
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING
A. Detailing on the balcony railings should reflect a more alpine character.
In response, the applicant has agreed to utilize balcony railings
that are more ornamental and reflect a more alpine character.
B. Once the mass and bulk of the building is refined, the window detailing
on the north elevation should be carried through to the other parts of the
project, particularly the east building.
17
, , • •
in response, the applicant has carried some of the window
detailing, such as a bay window, over to the east side of the north
elevation.
6. Employee Housing Issues - As indicated in a number of the goals and
objectives of the Town's Master Plans, employee housing is a critical Town
issue which should be addressed through the planning process of all
development proposals. The employee housing report prepared for the Town
of Vail by Rosall Remmen and Cares indicates recommended ranges of
employee housing units based upon uses and floor areas. The midpoint of
employees generated was used for the analysis. A copy of the report's
summary page is attached to this memorandum.
Upon review of this report, the staff has analyzed the incremental increase
(square footage per use) that the redevelopment would create and we would
recommend that the Golden Peak House include employee housing, either on-
site or off-site as a part of the redevelopment:
a) Bar/Restaurant = 1,081 sq. ft.(@ 6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 7.02
b) Retail/Service Commercial = 2,546 sq. ft.(@6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 16.5
c) Lodging = 2 AU's (@ 0.75/unit) = 1.5 employees
d) Total = 25.06 or 25 employees
25 employees x .15 housing multiplier = 3.75 or 4 employees
25 employees x .30 housing multiplier = 7.50 or 8 employees
Assuming two employees per unit, 2 to 4 employee housing units are
recommended.
At this time no additional information has been submitted to the Town
with regard to this issue.
7. Streetscape Design Issues - The Town's Streetscape Master Plan lists
numerous improvements which are recommended to be installed adjacent to
the Golden Peak House. These improvements generally call for the upgrading
of Seibert Circle and the upgrading of the pedestrian/skier access to the Vista
Bahn ski base. The applicant has indicated a desire to assist with the cost of
such improvements, however, at this time only a preliminary design has been
completed (in the Streetscape Plan).
The PEC/DRB should recommend and discuss the improvements they would
like to see the Golden Peak House developers install/construct as a part of the
redevelopment of the site. Such improvements should be directly related to the
redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, and should be tied to the mitigation
of the project's impacts on the Town and the adjoining public spaces.
18
� � '
The staff believes that improvements to Seibert Circle should be incorporated
into the project because the building is essentially proposed to be built up to the
property line. The space in front of the building needs to be addressed in
further detail. Staff is in the process of developing cost estimates for the
circular plaza per the Streetscape Plan for the applicant. The Vail Village
Master Plan specifically cites the relationship of this project to Seibert Circle.
The sun/shade analysis should be reviewed when analyzing the Seibert Circle
area.
At this time no additional information has been submitted to the Town
with regard to this issue. Although the applicant has expressed a
willingness to participate in these projects, the degree of participation has
not been determined.
c:�pecUnemos\goldpeak 111
19
, , • •
EXHIBIT "A"
Golden Peak House
Sguare Footaqe Analvsis
Existing Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA Office
Basement Level: 1,932 2,460 0 0
First Floor: 3,963 1,237 0 292
Second Floor: 1,301 1,332 2,466 168
Third Fioor: 0 1,480 3,749 0
Fourth Floor: 0 118 2,743 0
Totals: 7,196 6,627 8,958 460
Total square footage (gross area) - 23,241 sq. ft.
Proposed Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA Office
Basement Level: 5,214 1,703 0 118
First Floor: 5,943 1,028 0 0
Second Floor: *2,082 1,595 2,517 0
Third Floor: 0 804 5,242 0
Fourth Floor: 0 729 5,524 0
Fifth Floor: 0 43 2,780 0
Totals: 13,239 5,902 16,063 118
Total square footage (gross area) - 35,322 sq. ft.
'Does not include the Los Amigos deck area, which may be proposed to be enclosed at some
future date.
20
� �
Exhibit "B"
Golden Peak House
DwellinQ Unit Analysis
Existin :
DU AU
Basement Level: 0 0
First Fioor: 0 0
Second Floor: 8 0
Third Floor: 8 0
Fourth Floor: 2 0
Totals: 18 0 = 18 DUs
Proposed:
DU AU Lock-off
Basement Level 0 0 0
First Floor: 0 0 0
Second Floor: 5 0 0
Third Floor: 6 2 2
Fourth Floor: 4 0 0
: Fifth Floor: 1 0 0
Totals: 16 2 2
Note: 2 AUs = 1 DU Total DUs = 17
21
• • •
EXHIBIT "C"
Golden Peak House
Parkinq/Loadinq Analysis
Existing Conditions - Required
Parkinq Spaces Loadinq Berths
Retail Commercial/Restaurant 23.2 1
Residential 30.0 1
Office 1.2 0
TOTALS: 54.4 = 55 2 (minus 1 for multiple use credit)=1 berth required
Proposed Conditions - Required
Parkinq Spaces Loadinq Berths .
Retail Commercial/Restaurant 38.7 1
Residential 31.4 1
Office 0.5 0
TOTALS: 70.6 = 71 2 (minus 1 for multiple use credit)=1 berth required
22
� u
sP
��..
j�� � �� / ���' .
'� '� �� � - � ��
it� �:. � ��1' "
_ - -- -- �.
�!� �� � - � �
�� _ � ' ' - '� �
�� - - : � :� � '
. ,
�U��� �. 1 �; _1 � ,.
��'
1 ; - � F.
; �
. _ � ,
�.�- -�•-� � ,
,
.� , �,� � .
� � �
� �� ' - � .�� ' •
��� - �
, L�J�r .
���r '
��� ��� ;� �..
�i`��� - `' ,.
„ '�.���.�.�� I� � �''� �
_��.�_-�.. _ ,.�,�
� �. I �
l _� '1� ,
/ �.�. ` � ��.� ;
�
■ a�
.
� �• ` Y�
_ �
i� �I , --- .� ��:�
;� � , � � � �
� � �� , � � .
!�� ���� � �
.� - ., - �_ � ,�� ��-_ �
��� � _ � -�
���- � � � � � �
_ C I, �_ _ ! �. :�
� , l��s I � ;�
� 1 , !I� �I � �I . �
�- ,� -
� � �
,�� �;r� _� ��� 3�
; �E ' __ �
I , ��+ � �
I ���� � ��
���� ,, ��
;- C1l� � , ,� �
1 ��� � 1 J
1 � � _
, � ��- i � �
� �� ,
'� � -li � �
� � �� �_ --- � � �
, ,��, :�:
, .,.
� " � "�ti - '�� ��
. }
• ; ;�„�=�. �� �■.��w.
.�
:�
f✓ '' � -__.
.
, . . , r +
�
. . I
i r=' ^ .
,�' ' 1 '- • . .� �
J � . • : � _ _��-_ ---- �
i ; _ . .' . . . • . , . �--
-- _ _ % ' � � �Q
-- _ =7:-_- � •
- --_.-7_ � " • /� , • • >
: �_..� .__ -_-__ � . . I �.1.�
__ -�_,______ , �, .W
_!-__" - - -_ • � : , J
-- _= _ �-- --- �; . . . � �"" e
. . : •� ' ' ' • �. • . • . • . • . ' • . . . (n �
_ -_ -- -=----__--_ � W �
-_ -=�=_ -= - -- �`. ,
- - _�_I- � ' . 1 , . � N
- --./:.- ;1 • . . • ` �
_��__ I • . � v
-j_ _ .� � � q ,
_�_-., '� ' ' � . , .
`�__ � -���_=-- �• '. . � . \�� -- -�-t i
_ "-� • � `.' i �
- .�� � . ' • � � ' �
�_-= "_�- `__.. _ -_ I i -
=- � %..� ---.. - _ � � .
-- _� - -�.- . . ' • � ' �
- \��--�-- --- . ' i I �
• .'`.. "" .__ � I � 1
1 � � ' �
�.._-__ � �- . � . I !
--_--- � - - � - � . � . � � . � i
. _ , _ _ . : � �, I ;
, - . . ,
- _ � � - - � _ _ __ _ , �
_--- - _ - - - � --- - -. - --- - --- - - - ---,,�;,;�i
- - - - _ _ • I:,,�,'f
_=__ _-.- _ . . , . • . . � . . i f ` ,
. . ;►�i�) '
,
- - - _-_-._-_ . • ;�,;�i� i
=-= - -- - - ---- - -1... �.
__"'_ . . . 1 _ � �
�
� ' - y��'� ..
1
� �
�
,
;
,
,
_.. . � � -
�
�
- � t •• � . -
j -:�,�::�.�;
- . o ,r<,
I.f.'
. , �� ,� " ' �N�'
. . � ' .'�'`~`'ti�.Y•YTi •
. •�1
. . . . '^;r.:::•�
. . ...�- . .. . � . �{+�.
��• � . . .l . . _ � �-...�� ' 1.• —
- � � - -- � - �-. , � - �.
;� L __ . °
, _ . . ,. , 1 �-.
j = � _ -- - : . ;
� ��= - _ � - _ . � �� ; � �.,.�
� � - � - �
' ++ � __ , __ � --f '---" �
i �! _ - , �, fr� ;- ��� ' t
; �) --� ___ - _ �' e�
i I� i _- __ � �..�f ��/�6 � � `
� _ -_---_ _ � ��, ,� � � �
1\� "'�-�=�. 0.
-__ - - -_:._ __ � - ` _ _ i' � N
T - � ____-_—_ _ � y �� o.
�r �� d .-- - --__-_R_� �
, . _ . _ �,
�J . : _ -- : � q
� �- -= - --- _ �
, - - '� -=�- - C-� I
; �- -- _ � ; -
�� . --: . _- , - __ _ . ____�
. . . . �. . . . .
�� __ . . . . . _ � .
- � � � =-=-_-_
, �" � � ----- _-----
� � ;� ! _-�'� � r_c. --'----
I � f� r � —'�_+
� �
4-;- �
,\ I .
\ , �
� ,
�
�
���� �
r_ � I �
�M ��� '
�
�
� ;
. � . I
.,1 I
``, I '
' _ I
- :� -{ � ��- �
.� � �.s-====
. �
, �
�
;`�`' ;
� �\ �.
,....��.� �"r'
�I !��--,� ,.... ,..� I��I �t.
� ,1C3' � i - �
,� � I � y
,+ ' .'� �i.. 1 ��►� :_Y '
�� �� -� 1 ��� ��� �.
��, . � � = C;v{ _ ::= .
t I �' � i.
J
I� � (_' -I � -
( , �
-��1 � �i: ,
f�� � C.� ��� ��9p'� ::� �.
- - -- - ; �,-� C ��� �-
' � � • .
i � � � _ �� �':�
_ _ s� �~.
, � � �
_ � . Cr, � � :::�
..; � �0� Y�
1 ' �S
�, ����� :�
�_ ����._�t:
� � — -�
'� , (�� ��k
� �. � �s
_ ("_ � t
�I� t�t ����'i
� r � � :�,
, � � C >.
R/ � -:
♦
r' i S
I� � �
II � ' � I
�� �� �
. � �- � �
�' � c�-_ � .:
�. _ ...�... i=.
� �� � I �
� � 1 l:
� I��
� I =� ���,�
� �. - �.
�� 1 ' I �.�
�'3 � �; - _ �;Rt
7� �
� ��I ��
� _ �� � I .
, .� ,r, , � ,�;,� � -�;
` .� � � i _�;
c���� �
� __ _ ; :.
������ �� �; :;
t; C;, ; -
�� �
', , � � � �� �:
�I�� �� !� _; r �
; _ "'�� -
' ►=� _i �
� 1,�-� �.+� �� '.
'\ �"-- :G�'- -� :
,�
✓
� OQdl�O�'� ` l�dA �
�au ae.e.��rw . 4L�7/I w�0
'�"'� ""�°'� 1340W3a 3S(lOH �d3d N3(]lOJ t•�� -�»�� � �
.�.�,.�„�.�.«n .
�,_�........_...� ....__�....r. - _. '
� ---,
� �Z� Z f
--�
� . o o �
� <� < '.
r
i > � >
I I W W
J J
I } � -- W
i �-.
i W � � N
� � ;
i � � � � �
� �
� ,
� � ' �
� ;
i � �
� � �
� � � ---t
I
I
I �
I �
� J�����f �
�I .-.i ;nun� �
O
. �
M
; � --, �o•
,
,
� � r�' ° �
A � � �
; , �
� � � �
I j � j
� W
� �
'_�
� �, � N � '
I � � �
2
i �.' i + i O
I i � � j
' ',� � W _
� I ' �
� W
11 i I � �
I 1
. i i � ' ' = I
�
f � �
j i ---�
I
� � '� ►
; � �
, , �
� , �
� , �
� � --,
�
i i
� � � �
. i I �
' � �� �
I i � i
� j 1
I
� � I
� I
i ! I
( I j I
I j � I
I � I
I
1 1 � � I
I I �
I j --�
a i 1
I
0 � j _� '
I
_�
GGT - 1 4 - `� 3 THLt 1 ►3 : a5 � � uaC i � � r 8n � a� donHoPk i ns P . �3 1
Past-14'"'arand�ax transmittai momo 7671 � �s � �
� r. ---- � •1. � Fro�n 7, / 0"
ce. �� �,- Co. �� � .
Dcpt, h Phane N � ��� , . ._,..�. , ......... .....,....,, . ....,.
� � , � .
FOx# � � � • fax� +..�� ' �-!Gr�-u� � !..f . . ....��Sf.f':.f.+f� .!�.Y..<:�����
Jf'��.�.,.�:u/h—
<�
_.;_..,�.._.,_ __ .._....._.. ._...,.,... ,..... ,.. _.._..,..,�....__,_..-�--._.,...,__,,.........---...._....,....,,,
. �_..._.._.....�, � __�;� . .�G�..�� �e �t'�--`��� , r,,,�.����C'
.._.--------.� ..,.. ..,.-(...�.�...,, , _�,... 4 , . . . , . � . ,
�/r!r! ' ' +
I�I �
. ; � �..�, � .�.�
..�..�.---- :� ._ ' .. ..�_ .._._...�._._..T_.�_ � ,. . .....�
� �'�!��,.� C2G�`�..�.- r.�.. ��
�...._.......____...,. ....,. R..� ..�.. __.._____ __._. _ .. .. . , . . . .
'i ��� _�r'-� .r�W.�. �._._�.�� �:-..., ..•�..�_.�,��.� _.
_�....,�.,_.. .�...._ .... ...�.. r....�_ ,�_ .
� : � � �/� ,
,
� ,�i/��L� ��L�. G�t2'G/
r - . ,.,,, �.. _..,. .._ ....,
.,,._,,._._,...._-._ ,._ .�. .._..�..._. �i� .._�_ .....�....1 . .. . . ,, .
_ _ . .
, �,ti, _ ���• G��G�C/C,CG
__.._....__._._...._ .�.__, ,__...,.. _.� .... .�._.. . w ,.. _., .__.. ,._.. .., . _ ....._._.�....... .... .. ... . ..,.,....�......_,_�.
�
� � �
. �.�.-. �?,�-� �..�-� .�.-� _
i .. � �
�,W..M_._.�._ ..�...,..._�-__._._�._.___.s.._�_ ....�...� _...�._... ..,_ . . _ ._.....��_ . . .. �,W.._.......
..___ ' �
...__ l ����.�. .��•�'_.__.....__..._. . _. __. ..._,...��,... ._ . ...._..... .., . .
. ,�
�
�
,
��.._....__._,.._+ ._....... . ....____._ ..__...._...__ . .. .. .---- ... .. _ . .. --- .._.._.__..�.._. _ _._._... __...,.._.��_...._.._ _
� �. _. �- ....,�� . _ ��- .. . ._.�.��._.�� .. -�-�
.......��. . .... ,� .. .. ..�.. ,. ... �� -�
.
, �� ,��� �- ��,��y�' � � �'��.�?r
,� ._
. ,.._.__.... � ,.,�. _,. . _ .. _ .,..�... „ ._ _ ...
...w_ _
,. , �, � � .
� . �
� ��
r A .
�a �C.<....- ��_,..�a._�... . . a�..
. _..,.. _.... ,� . ._.. _... _.�.�_... .. �� ._ . .._ . �a .,..
� � �' ������ ��s �� � ��
, .. . , �
. '' .�� ���y �� ���
�.. . ,. ��{ . . � .... . ,._ . . ,
- . .
��
� � � � �
� ._. .,.._. .... ...,. , _....._ _.. . _.
_ ........--- ;E ,�..,.�,�-� - . .
. . ,,_�.....,, ,. � , . � .. _ .. .. . .. .._.0 . ,.a. ... . .
��
,, ...�.,._..._. .,. � .. ,...,�. . ,. , , . . . _. . ...,..._,.,--...... __.._.._ ........r.�.,�_ . _ . _. __..._._ _.
. �....._...... ;. .. � i�� ��: �,.=� �•�!'.�, � .
.�f �
. ..._._....�_.. ;� . �..-�-c�.. � . . .. . �- ?� .. . . . . .
, � . .�
. . ,..... ._ � �f,�,,�-rt-�-� ��-��-�.�... �,�' .,.��.:�-�s-�..�.y ���.�'
� �
�I I t�� ���� ����
. . . . _ ,,�� .
��� . ..
��� �-�- � �— ��"�.
. ....._... .:,, . .
� �I
....._.-�---_...___.�� .._. .... .... .�.,, . . , . ., . . ., ,. ._ ... ... . .. _ ...,,. ... ,. . ,,, . ,
1
l'
� �.. .. ,
......�,.........�..........� .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .�.,.. .... , �. ..�.. .... ,��.. � .. .�, �� � . � �-.._.., .._�......_ .... .. , ...... _. .
�(,
..., .��.�..�.....�... .�� . . . .� .. ., . . ... � . . .. ��.�.�. , . . . . .. .. ... . ... . ...... , . .. . �
..._......._.._....r.,......� ....�..�.,. .. . . . . . .. . . ,.. . .�. .� � � .,
�
�.a� � , �
.
EXHIBIT A � °
PRpF�kTY D88CR��"�'7CC�N
�b;�at pert af �r ara ar in the �Q�ice � the F�gle �Couri�YdiColo�'ado�
m�►p ther�c�f rec
Clerk aad Aeaorder, � d��cr�.b�d as �ol,�.ows:
C�►sr�oir�g �t the �tW'1/16 carae�c af Sectior� g, �ovm�hip 5 Soa��h,
�ga 80 woot oi t�e �ixth Princip8l Me�idian. g��-d po3nt also
bei,n the northwe�ter�.y c�rr3eac of said Tract �; thence, a�.ang the
na�tharl,y �iaQ af ca�.d T�aat �, N89°44 'd0"E 9.Od t��t ta the Tru�
poimt ot Seginaing� thex�ce, coatinu#�ng along said nort:�erly ].�ne,
N89'44' Op"E 7.00 �Qat to tho �cau#hw�sterlg �:ernar �f (�olden Peak
�ouse (A Cc�nclomirx�u�oa Prc�ect) �cco�ding to the m�ap thexeof recorded
i.n the otfice v� i:he L"a9�a CQtu�ty, GpLQ��dOr C�.e�ck �nd Re�order;
thence the fol.lawing two course� alang the co�an line o� ea�.d
Tte�ct E �d �ce��.d Gois�er� Peak Sorxse: {1) �169°94� OO�tE 8�.DO te��•, (2)
Y�59'45' Oq"E 52.50 te�t t� �he �oc�theasterly corn�r af $aid Golden
Pes�k 8dnsei theu��� degartiQ� seid ccmuaan lirser S30°15'Oo"� 6.fl0
�ee�f ther�ce S59•45'04"W �2.50 �ee�f thence S31Y42' 95"W 5.56 feehe
thance S89•44'o0"w 9�.0o teet th� o
True Po�rnt of Segi�ni.ng, n a�n�ng 1240 �quar� �e�tr more or 7.es
De,te:�1'��- . �-'^- �.� -
stan aogf
� Colcrado F.�.S. 26598
rerrised par.t d� t�aCt �, t4 goldea� peak hnu�e�
Al9G - 1 � - � 3 MC� N 1 1 : � 4 ta � uaC i �. er SnowdanHoP � i ns P . 03_
_. ......,_.. _, ..,..._ ... _.., ._.. _.,,._ ._..__._ _._ .--°
� - . q
,. _�r- �I DOC
" - u���;os � � : a� �!!e'�'- i: t' Sl[Zt�E1'1\G
. ,,,�
�
PROP�RTY 1��SCxt7�TXON
That pa.�t af �,ot �, Pln�k 5-C� Vail Vi�.lac,�e, �'irst Filing,
according to the m�p the�eo� reao�c�ed i�n th.e of�ice af the Eagle
Couat�, Co�.azado, C�.ark a�d R�carder, de�cr�.bed e�� fa1.�.ows:
Comnuncfng at tbc �1/15 Co�ne� ca� Sod�ian 8, Townal�3p S Sauth,
1�aage 60 �e�� of �he Sixth pr�.ncipal Mez�.dian, said NWi/16 corner
��.t�o beir�g au the� aouth Iiae of e+�id Lot a; ��e7�C�r dlong eaid
�outh liae of Lo� c, N89'4�4' 00"E 9.80 feet ta the True Pa�.nt of
Aeqi�ingi the�xce�, departiag �afd aoutIa �.i.n�, N00°16•OQ"W 1.77
feet= the�e N19'S2'36"W 34.72 fee� to the south�rly �#,ght of �v�,y
13.u� v� the in�er�ectivn o� 8r�dqa Straet and Han�on Ranch Rvad�
theace, a�long eaid right o� w�y 1ina, N51°26' 00"� 6.33 feet to the
northeasterly corner of Goldsa P�ak $ouee (A Condominiu� ��oject)
accordiag to the mnp thereof recoxc�ed ia �he offi�e of the Eag1e
County, Color�do, Clerk and ReCO�rderf thencQ� alanq �he wet�terly
liyne at aaid Go�,den Peak Houee, S19°SS '41"� (S19°52'3�"S
ca�cutla��d) 36.77 �8et to the southeastezly cozner of said Lo� cp
theriGe, alang the 8o��herly li.ne o� s S89°4�4 '�0" .00
�eet ta the� xrus Point af Baginning, contaa.ning �0 square Fae ,
mt�x�e or 3.�ss.
Date e � .�.����-'�
� ��tIR gOc�� ■ r
Co�.orado P.L.S. 26598
�e�r3.sad pa�t of 3.0� a tr� golde�► paa�k hbutte
5/1��98 �h wp1 906a
r_. �'I/�j/ w' `�_J - .
-- f / •iJ _ K E�' � � . . . ., ,;..�
, TO ;� �
. ,
�819� _
8i8�
,i e�'° � o VIEW ANALYSIS
oc► $ �
. :�;
.g���N;E����:; � ��� .,...�.
�'
i �'�
. � , � �
. �
I � ,,- "
/• ` ',/.
� ������������ r� �.
/• � .;`.;;::`.:::�.�;;:,�:'�; �� •.. ' ;�- � ��;,.
c� :3i;tE��.'' :4 •'' X�
, :.� :��:.,.:,. ,��----.__� - ,_.,� � :\\
.BR�� w --"'_" „ 'n �' .��;
•' 'r ,; $I.GC�4. ;, � >.;: ,.,.. . ':', . . � �
GR���1� � ` Vlu3; TOWff?i0U88b ;: ; .
;�:st,da..;�. .ciocx , ' .
�� m �'�W�R
� - - ��u R �q` I
• 56.6 . II �
�... ., � � ` .. '.
� �. ;;:::�;:;��''� �
.\ .,� ' ... = "_ � : : _.&!$ -
gC2+C1. .• � >Mft�.. Cit�EK
1iL�4'; ''�fCWO� �:' OOU'R��.9L.R�, �.
OR� B�D � � � � .
C/��trt0 . ' �. � '� - _
` �=;
oa��E ::::. Q .sc,�c�. �� ; .
:1:�J�R �.. ..
� 7kI��4D�. `� \ •.
�:�,o�. o , �
; �;;:;, •.....
.. . �1� CNAT�AU'
.. . ., „ - , .
;. � ,. : :, . .. R"F.0 .L� �:. � '
•.� �.�.. Ct1A19�'iAN
: : •:'..: . •:� �� � -
. ....
. `�
. �, ��
o�, .BL°'a�`: � � F.
titt.� p� `� � � ,
� :�� � � YRA�N , ��'�
4 - � ' �X---r-- - �
; 7 � ' \^
• HILL 8La0. ,� ' `'
�y .�h''+ S ,� � \\ \�
. 0 ��� �
% ' . , \ '
'ttCKET . '
OfE;ICEE.... / r;
, � , � ;
' j L.O. � -
� �� i .
� � . %
' -= ' / �--�
_ - i ,�- ; ',
� � �, ,
��� i/ � iENT � j' f � .
� -.� ! ' � i � '�_
/ J% ` /
, , n � ; L.0. �' . t i-�� ~
�. . _ �' . �. . ��� '�- �^ - , ..�:: ,: .. ,,,�:--"
:
_ _ .,� __ _
• . . � �
. ,
�
�
� !
�
� �
m
� -
: ` �
� �
.�o
� 7
� ;
� �
� �
-
v �
�
m ;
M' {
� �
� �
� , �^1
!"'�J
m
rn
�
;
� i
�.
0
A
�
OD
�
• . . � � • ,
�---�._._�.. y.._.__ . ----� •
. ^- .. _ �
i
' I �
C � �
�
m
. �
_ �
� � i
�o ,
o �
� - � . �
,
� , ��
�o '
_ �
v �
� ��
, ,
m %�
��
� �
�
�
rn �
rn ,
-� .
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
w
1 I � � .
. �
, 1 .
,
� I
I
G� j
I '
C , / �
_ � _
m ' `�1 �
� ,
� _ '�
�
�o .
0
� � -f� ,
,
� �\ �
� �
_
v �
�
rn �
� -
tn � �
-� �
� � �
rn � \
m � �
� . � �
�C'
_ -- -�
- ,
�
�-.,,
�
, � �..r
�
a
Z �
�
�
�
�
�
. I
. _ � -
�
�
C
rn .
�.
-n
�o
0
� ,
� .��
o __.�
c �
z
v
rn
�v
�
.
�
r
�
N
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
. . � � ' � h v
�
�
� ��
I ���
C \�
� �
m ��
�
� ��
]o �
�
� 1
�
/
2 /�
� �
Z
�
rn _ �
�
��
� L_rl
Z '�
�
C� t�
_ �
�
� i
0 � �
�
v
0
�
�
�
� .
. . r i �
i
1
� �
� � � I
f �
. -
� �-� I
�. - � �
� i �
� � i �
r �
=� �
� � �
r � �
� ,
� �
� �
� ,
� ,
� ,
� � �
� ,
r �
_ � ,
� �
� � ,
I �
� � ,
���
� , ,�,� t
- � � 1♦ �
`� '
`
7 - V IEW CORRIDOR 2
OCT g i993
, � • , • . � "�„' ' :
� �.r. �r.....��.�������.� �. .
1
I
0o t� ;
� ��
� ►
� �
- �l
m �
� �—���
1 �
n I-_ --��
O ♦
�o �
�o �
_ �
v �
o �
� �
� 1
- 1
I
i
I
I
I
I
��- I
�
� t
«
�.�
�.-.
. • � �
FILE � . �
��' :�
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
October 11, 1993
MINUTES
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Greg Amsden Kristan Pritz
Bill Anderson Mike Mollica
Jeff Bowen Andy Knudtsen
Diana Donovan Jim Curnutte
Kathy Langenwalter Shelly Mello
Allison Lassoe Tom Moorhead
Dalton Williams
1. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior
alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View
Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C,
Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a presentation per the staff inemo. This presentation focused on
the changes that have occurred to the proposed Golden Peak House redevelopment
since the September 27, 1993 PEC worksession. He stated that staff was
recommending approval of this request for the establishment of a Special Development
District, a CCI exterior alteration, a zoning change and an encroachment into View
Corridor No. 1 with the four understandings contained on Pages 27 and 28 and the
seven conditions outlined on Page 28 of the staff inemorandum. He stated that staff
was not supporting the applicant's request to add a retractable enclosure over a
portion of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck.
Craig Snowdon, the architect for this project, explained the modifications that have
been made to the Golden Peak House since the last PEC worksession.
Ctark Willingham, the developer, responded to the staff's recommendations beginning
on Page 27 of the staff inemorandum. He stated that he has agreed to the
understandings on Pages 27 and 28 (1, 2, 3 and 4). He said that he feels that the
retractable enclosure for the dining deck is an integral part of this project. He said that
the enclosure would have a canvas awning but it would be retractable so that they
could take advantage of the sun on sunny days. He said that the awning would only
be down on days when the weather is inclement. Concerning staff's recommended
Condition #1, he said that he did not have any control over Units 305 and 306 being
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
1
. • � �
placed into the short-term rental pool due to agreements made by previous owners.
Concerning Condition 5, he said that a gravel roof would be more practical for this
project. Concerning Condition 7, he said that he could not commit to this condition as
the condominium units were owned by other parties.
Dalton Williams asked the applicant to explain in more detail how the proposed
retractable deck enclosure would work.
Craig Snowdon explained the proposed deck enclosure in further detail. He said that
the retractable enclosure would be composed of glass and wood sides and that a
canvas awning would be the roof material.
Dalton Williams inquired whether the proposed planting area at the base of the dining
deck would be at-grade.
Craig Snowdon stated that the planting area would be at-grade and that the types of
plants proposed to be used would be "snow resistant".
Dalton Williams asked the applicant about the two "fake" windows on the west
elevation.
Craig Snowdon responded that there were actually three windows that would look into
the stairway leading up to the restaurant and into the retail shops.
Allison Lassoe inquired how wide the flagstone walkway was proposed to be on the
south side of the building.
Jeff Bowen and Greg Amsden did not have questions for the applicant concerning this
proposal.
Diana Donovan inquired whether there was a public pedestrian easement between the
Golden Peak House and the Hill Building.
Clark Willingham explained that the applicants would be dedicating an easement to
Vail Associates.
Mike Mollica stated that the Town would need to be listed as a co-tenant on this
easement in order to insure that this area remained accessible to the public.
Bill Anderson inquired why the applicant had changed the roof material from cedar
shake shingles to a tar and gravel roof.
Craig Snowdon stated that they had considered a cedar shake shingle roof and that it
would be too costly. For ihis reason, they decided to go with the tar and gravel roof.
He added that the cedar shake shingles would also add 6 to 8 inches in height to the
building.
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
2
, . � •
Mike Mollica clarified that staff was not recommending an expansion on the first floor
of the north elevation, but rather divided light windows on the store fronts to add more
pedestrian interest.
Kathy Langenwalter asked staff to explain in more detail their position concerning the
first floor and the arcade.
Kristan Pritz stated that staff was concerned that the previous first floor of the north
elevation was preferred by staff. The Design Review Board would need to look closely
at this item.
Mike Mollica stated that the arcade would be a positive addition for the pedestrian
experience. Concerning the roof materials, he said that the Design Review Board
would also need to look at this.
Kathy Langenwalter inquired whether Conditions 4 and 5 should be eliminated.
Diana Donovan stated that Condition 4 should be directed to the Design Review Board
for review.
Bill Post, representing Margretta Parks (Cyrano's), stated that they are not opposing
the Golden Peak House redevelopment. He said that they are concerned that the
Cyrano's views have not been addressed in the staff memorandum. He said that they
are also concerned that an approval of the Golden Peak House redevelopment would
be precedent setting. He said that what is approved for the Golden Peak House will
have a definite effect on what the Cyrano's redevelopment application will be for. Bill
said that he was particularly concerned with how the Golden Peak House had
appeared to move out on the southeast corner and how this would effect the views
from Cyrano's.
Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association, inquired of the
applicant whether the Tract E covenants would be changed prior to the minor
subdivision being signed. He said that he felt this was important so that the people
involved with signing the covenant changes would know exactly what the Golden Peak
House proposal consisted of. He stated that he felt that there needed to be a greater
monetary contribution from the applicant for Streetscape improvements, given the
scope of the Golden Peak House project. Jim stated that the approval of this request
would be a grant of special privilege due to the overages of the zoning standards, the
use of open space for GRFA increases and the temporary enclosed deck. He felt that
this was an improper use of open space land. He said that he still did not feel that
there was enough community benefit from this property to justify the deviations from
established zoning standards.
Kristan Pritz stated that the money which the Town receives as a result of the real
estate transfer tax can not be applied towards the proposed Seibert Circle Streetscape
improvements.
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
3
•. •
Mark Matthews, representing the Mill Creek Homeowners Association, stated that there
were concerns by these property owners that the mass and bulk of the Golden Peak
House proposal would negatively effect their views.
Paul Johnston, representing the Christiania, stated that he felt that the Golden Peak
House redevelopment would improve adjacent property owners' views.
Ron Riley, owner of the Los Amigos Restaurant, gave the PEC a history of prior
approvals for the Golden Peak House. He said that eight years and in excess of
$300,000 have been spent trying to figure out what to do with this building. He said
that he felt that what Clark Willingham has been able to do with this proposal,
especially with regard to the view corridor, is commendable. He stated that he did not
agree that the Cyrano's building should automatically receive overages as that of the
Golden Peak House since the two buildings are separate sites and projects with
different circumstances. He encouraged the PEC to look favorably upon the project.
Clark Willingham stated that he wanted to respond to the public comments that had
been made. He said that the Golden Peak House was not expanding past the
property line. He said that he would like to see the Cyrano's building redevelop and
that he did not feel that the Golden Peak House redevelopment would negatively
impact the Cyrano's site. He said that he did not agree with the comment that an SDD
was not appropriate for this site. Clark stated that the redevelopment of the Golden
Peak House would set a positive precedent. He added that each project should stand
on its own. He said that they would be improving the building with regard to its safety.
Concerning the Mill Creek Homeowners, he said that the Golden Peak House
redevelopment improved the views from Mill Creek Court on the west end but that
there might be some negative impacts to views from Mill Creek Court on the east end.
Diana Donovan made a motion that the PEC temporarily adjourn into an executive
session with Tom Moorhead. Greg Amsden seconded this motion and a 7-0 vote
adjourned the PEC into an executive session.
Upon returning from the executive session, Bill Anderson stated that Conditions 1, 3, 4,
6 and 7 should be required. Concerning Condition 2, he was not in favor of the arcade
but felt that this was a Design Review Board item. Concerning Condition 5, he stated
that he was not in favor of the shake roof. Bill could not support the deck enclosure as
it added too much mass and bulk to the elevation.
Diana Donovan stated that she supported Conditions 1, 3, 4 and 6. She stated that
Condition 2 should be left up to the Design Review Board. She stated that she felt
Condition 5 should be eliminated. She said that she felt that Condition 7 should be
eliminated. Concerning compensation for the loss of Tract E, she stated that it was
essential that Vail Associates dedicate the Mill Creek stream tract or Pirate Ship Park
as permanent open space, prior to releasing any building permits. The deck was not
appropriate.
Planning and Environmentat Commission
October 11, 1993
4
, . � •
Greg Amsden stated that he supported Conditions 1 and 3. He said that Condition 2
could be left to the Design Review Board. He stated that he would like to see
Conditions 5 eliminated. Concerning the deck enclosure, he did not feel that the
proposed system would work and could not support the deck enclosure.
Jeff Bowen stated that he agreed with the other Board members' comments. He
stated that he was in favor of Condition 1. Concerning Condition 2, he stated that he
was ambivalent about the pedestrian arcade. He stated that Conditions 3, 4 and 5
were Design Review Board issues. Concerning Condition 6, he felt that each
surrounding property owner should be assessed a percentage of the cost of the
Seibert Circle Streetscape improvements. He is not in favor of Condition 7.
Concerning the proposed retractable enclosure, he stated that an awning would be
okay but what was being proposed did not seem feasible. He added that he felt that it
would be positive if Vail Associates dedicated Pirate Ship Park to the Town as open
space.
Allison Lassoe stated that she was in favor of Conditions 1 and 7. She stated that
Conditions 2, 3, and 4 were Design Review Board issues. She stated that she had no
opinion about what roof materials were utilized. She stated that she would like to see
the applicant contribute $10,000 into the Seibert Circle redevetopment fund up front.
She was opposed to any covering of the dining deck.
Dalton Williams stated that he was in favor of Condition 1. Concerning Condition 2, he
did not have a problem with the pedestrian arcade but felt that it was a Design Review
Board issues. He stated that he was in favor of Conditions 3 and 4. Concerning
Condition 6, he stated that the applicant should agree to contribute his share of the
Seibert Circle Streetscape improvements. He stated that the heated public sidewalk
was a community benefit. He stated that the Town was getting a lot back with this
proposal (i.e. improved view of the ski mountain). He stated that he was in favor of
Condition 7. He stated that he was against the proposed retractable deck enclosure
and the materials that would be used for such an enclosure. He said that he is not
necessarily against the idea, but he does not feel that any of the proposed enclosure
scenarios are acceptable.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that there are two major issues involved with this project.
She stated that the first issue concerns the view corridor encroachments. She stated
that the second issue concerns the exterior alterations to the building which are not in
conformance with the zoning standards and the issue of public benefit. She stated that
she was concerned about the amount of relief from the zoning standards that the
applicant was requesting. She said that due to this, she feels that Conditions 1 and 7
are necessary as well as the open space land being dedicated to the Town, from Vail
Associates. She felt that the applicant should contribute more than $10,000 into the
Seibert Circle Streetscape improvements fund, but felt the amount was a Council
issue.
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
5
, . • •
Clark Willingham stated that it was not within his power to agree to Conditions 1 and 7
at the present time. He stated that the main deviations were from the zoning
standards (concerned GRFA) and the encroachment into View Corridor 1. He felt that
the public benefits of the proposed Golden Peak House redevelopment outweighed
these two items.
Jack Rush requested that Condition 1 should be reworded from "rental pool" to "rental
program".
Ron Riley requested that the PEC grant the applicant more time to explore possible
solutions for the outdoor dining deck. He stated that the deck was an integral part of
the Golden Peak House redevelopment request.
Dalton Williams, Allison Lassoe, Greg Amsden and Bill Anderson did not have
additional comments.
Jeff Bowen stated that he felt that the tar and gravel roof was acceptable.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she was not in favor of the proposed deck enclosure.
Diana Donovan made a motion to approve this request for the establishment of a
Special Development District, a Commercial Core I exterior alteration request, a minor
subdivision request, a zone change request and a request for an encroachment into
View Corridor No. 1 per the staff inemo, with the following additions to the staff's
recommended conditions: (PEC's comments are in bold)
The staff's recommendation of approval is based on our understanding that the
following are included in the redevelopment:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment
project, the developer will provide two off-site, two-bedroom, permanently
restricted employee housing units. Each unit shall be a minimum of 700 square
feet in size. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance
requirements.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the developer will deed restrict two three-bedroom
dwelling units (Units 201 and 401) to be included in the Golden Peak House
short-term rental pool, at all times when they are not occupied by the owner or
his guests.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the developer will contribute $10,000.00 towards the
redesign and redevelopment of Seibert Circle.
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
6
, � •
4. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant, or Vail Associates (co-applicant), will
dedicate open space to the Town. It was agreed that the open space area
would be an equivalent amount, when compared to the amount of floor area
proposed to be located in the "overhang and deck" easements. It was
suggested that the Mill Creek stream tract or the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract
E be dedicated as permanent open space.
Diana Donovan stated that the dedication of Pirate Ship Park by Vail
Associates to the Town should occur prior to a building permit being
issued for the Golden Peak House. She said that the Mill Creek stream
tract would be the second choice if Vail Associates chose not to dedicate
Pirate Ship Park. In addition, Diana stated that the square footage needs
to be equal in size to the former drip easement and sidewalks proposed
along Los Amigos. She added that the applicants would need to grant a
public access easement in the skier access, prior to building permit, with
the stipulation that the Town of Vail be the co-easement holder.
The staff's recommendation for approval does not include the applicant's request to
add a retractable enclosure over a portion of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck.
It should be noted, that the PEC's recommendation to Town Council for approval
of this SDD does not include the applicant's request for an enclosure over the
Los Amigos dining deck.
In addition to the above, the staff recommendation for approval carries with it the
following conditions:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant agree to restrict, and place into the
short-term rental pool, the lock-offs associated with Units 305 and 306.
Diana Donovan stated that she would like the wording "rental program" to
replace the phrase "rental pool".
2. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor
retail windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan,
which does not include the curved retail windows along the eastern portion of
the building, be added back into the design.
The PEC felt that the Design Review Board should review this item.
3. That the applicant further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights.
The PEC felt that this item was acceptable as recommended by staff.
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
7
� � °
4. That the applicant lower the roof form over the main entry.
The PEC felt that the Design Review Board should review this item.
5. That the applicant utilize a shake roof on the building.
The PEC would like to see this condition deleted as a condition of
approval.
6. That the applicant contribute a total of $32,000 towards the redevelopment of
Seibert Circle.
The PEC felt that the Town Council should review this condition, however,
that the $32,000 was appropriate, with the understanding that this amount
would be credited to the Golden Peak House if a future special
improvement district were formed. Diana Donovan encouraged the Town
to work on the redevelopment of Seibert Circle in conjunction with the
Golden Peak House construction activities.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for
the redevelopment project, the applicant restrict the two new accommodation
units, so that in the future, they cannot be converted into dwelling units via the
Condominium Conversion section of the Subdivision Regulations.
Dalton Williams seconded this motion and a 7-0 vote approved this request.
Kristan Pritz stated that this item would be heard by Town Council at the October 19,
1993 evening meeting.
2. A request for a fence height variance to allow for a fence to be constructed around a
swimming pool at the May Residence located at 1119 Ptarmigan Road/Lot 6, and the
east 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 5, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Paula May
Planner: Shelly Mello
Shelly Mello made a presentation per the staff inemo. She stated that staff was
recommending denial of this request. She added that staff could support a variance
for fence height if the proposed fence was made of a more transparent material and
the fence was limited to the enclosure of the swimming pool area.
Diana Donovan stated that the fence appeared to look like a "fortress".
Planning and Environmental Commission
October 11, 1993
8
:
� � � �
/�•//• 9 3 ���.e.. f� lr1�o�-e — ��� G�� �!P.r.�r-
-___ __ � L'.� 5 .►.�.,,
, . .
---� -��
__-- -- ------ ----- ------------- ----
___-- ------____ _------ ------ ----
�
—_ _ _ .__ -"--��-'---�-�-- � -�1�� 30�_� 30�,__—el.��--_---
cxs�__�____-������ ou-r-�,� .- ------ -----
- �� ��.�., �--'� �� .�_
�-�,'� — --�-����--- �t�?�__,-�+-- __�?�_- -----------
--��'" �'°�---�'-� —�—`—'�� -��'I�e ;-------
-- ---- ---- --�--��-_-��--���.�-------
�.�1�- �� - ,�:z ,�:..�_���� � -��rz �� f�� ?
- --_.�-e__ �e.� -�`-.� ---�--�^-� .S ?- - ---
��s-._'__��� ,v' ��- �UGl/`t_f��w /y---------- ----------
C'�' c - �L�G_-------- - --
���� - l �
� --- �-�-�- ---�' - -------- - —
------------=_T�' -_.�-- -=-�.r�.� -=���_�
.Gtre.,.-�' _�G _/.1%�---a ,� ,�
-- ----____— ____ _ �l!'��+s�L_-�
-- �• h 0�- .__ !��--S�qrr.+-�a� --- ...P�� A��„ i(���,.n
—��s�.-��
!� - , _ ----— ---_----- - -- - --------
--�(b. _�/1��/�n-=-�t�-��C2c�_��__�r}��-�—�-����__ �►.-:o��,,, _
__1'� � �� � _���_ ' z- __ _ _ --- --_ -- ------
t2� ►2.�:1�„ - !9��__�_���� ���,.., �h�
� �• ►�Ec c��,�..�. a
�c��' - a�,� �,...1 G'o.-•�C�=�.�- #1.
� ��,� w� � 2
/
� # 3
— -,-a� —
_ � _ i
_ -�- - '� }
- �7 -
w -#.� � - _ �
y� z - ��� � � �--���
� R — "
• /�c� �-�•,��� --�—� s �����
-�`e .���—� �---� � ���
��� �� �..��.:. ,
�
# � -
, �
;
_ � _ .
#� 2 -
�� - � ��.
�
� '
�
. • F • � � 3
�
!�U%��--� , — � l — C,�:� ��� of -r-,�,-�—� �e c.�.�.
_ � ��.�a P'�' � �
------ — � - Q , __v_T .
--f- _____ ,,.,
-- .�.�._���--- �- --- -----__----
,
. - - ---�--- —
, .. _ . .
!,---- -���=-�L-�—�_�- - ' - -�- -
��w. --- - -- ---------
�
- n..�� �___��--�-�- _-��� � ._�. _----
-- #?-- ��..���=� -� ���_��_____
- � � ---�- �------ ----- ------ ----___ -
- -#3 - �� .��_1�..-� - � -- -
.� _
-- �' ----o�--� .
� r .
_ �
- - -_---- ----- - -- -- -�---- - ---------
---------��---- .� ___�-._.__.GOM..WVL.� __ ._ �_LSlY{ �w°�_----
� Q (,/��
_____—____'-__'-_-_____ �_'-!1�r,'�' -+--1-� - --
_..._---------��--�s!_---_-�!�_. _ _- _ _
' - 1�10 I
--- � �.�--- --- -- -
-- ' � �-Q'--1 w.�_D �!� � rnr►� v�i(r/ C.(/l/L��rlS�'1 �Gt.L Z. —
.
- - ----- -- ---- --------_--- --__-- ----- ---
(�0 1 ' /�-�-y-�
• �
__---- ------------- - - - - - -- -
r
---------- ____ __ ----�--G�%'��- � ��---� � _�_�__� -�- �-.��E�2=iG?�/�-��`" -
!/U (/
-#��v - �LO �_ .�. �_��„ — �
_ ___- ------- - - - --��-- -
7-
. .
- �� -------__ __ __-
, , . i�i
. � �
�� � - �� �� �
� � �- ,
--,,
.
;
�
�
�� 1�� — !n/D n�� �rr-e-r� .Z'� ��o��-/__�-p " c�,.p � �
(/
1''1�.� : _ p
� �1�.���� -o�-.-��
, -
__--_
_ _ � ,
— -- �"�` � � �^-�' , �-;�c
� � �� ���
� ( � -� ti,. ,�. $�
_ �- z- - �a� ,
-� 3 � '
� � �iA �►-�--�
�z
�- �' - Zj� �
y
�,�
� S' - ' . �3?°� j�►,.�,.�
� <o - o/�
� � -
� �" _" - °�' �,
. r
_ _ v _
Z � - v�. Ud : �� o
� �
, �
• �' ��� � ��
! , . � �
� �
�
.
�� � 3
- 3 +
g ` I ��/,
_, � ` 1 �
\ . ` �� —�-- .
\ l ���_`�\ .
\ � \\J/���[��� �1 L
\ � � �1 ,_: ���
� sM �o` 1\ �:F
� .
�� f,
� � � � � � �a� � '�,.
� � a \� � � � � ' � 5
I � � �� � � ° Z
� �l a� n ,�D �� � °-
� � p "�`�� 3 �/
�, , � . , �%
� ,---, �`� � ��� � �� /� �
; — `� ��� � � �s ,� ��� C\ '�� �
i __ 3 `
' " � - ( •�`� � `
\uTiurf r,ye w,� � t: , 4 ' \
�---�— — .,� �;:
;�;�°��;;, : �, r�
�/ \ -, - - -- � ,
�\ ��_r '�',i: �
/\ i ... - 4 � �� �
/ � / E �i j kI�f�L f
/ \ � �/ �$�� z� ���- i " � � I:';f i�!';'l�;i!�� !' I�i
� �
� �� \ \ ;.�-, �b-� i �?: ��� � ��# � �''�- _—� �! �
S�iz p at� �[�' � �- �i'� �x �..
.. /' �T �S � ��)[ � �f��� �R \
. � T' � � l �S'jF � :���:�:Y�(' ��if`� � ! � '� � !�'� �
/ �� J ; w� �. f�"'� 'I���`I � TF Z� � �- � �
. �-.y • \ -� �( � �& '• �� `�"L � ;j ��� � a!i�� �� � � ���
}\ I{ , �c �
�;; / � •� \ t \ � � � '� � ;_ �\ •'I ;��!'Ilf��, ���.�' n� t ,I�j�� fF�
� 1 � 1 � 6 : [
� � �� � \ �� ! �!�t. � � ��� �:
'L_ y,; � ����I :i;: � !'� (I
,... � � �; f.. �
-}— � � il: •! 1!;,:?"�y't���. ,'I�fI f!j�I .
/ I � � ii,}n � }�'I�I'r,tr, �, �"{��� I!i
� ��' � I , � 'v; � `"':t� � �'''��`,����i'�I' 't�I I;ii i i �
��- �� � �' :� J i�,�;fi, i ,1�� _ .
. � �� o: r]� �:�;�„t:,l��:x : �
� {� � � m, I ,i \ ,�:{ ., ; i'�:. 'o m
� . � ti� � ��sr l � x o. � � `� o °-
k�+cr1C � I +�f 1 � � • j y . �f� C O
� ���� � ��� � Z Z_
� 'm 1�£� � = r�
�--� � I � _� ��� �� =t z
\ � � \ t �� '�
\ � ,� � ` ' � ��_ �� ��
� \ � �.. ;� '
1 � � '_
; ' �\ �\ { � v� /:
�
� �
� \� \ ���' � � -
t� � �\ � ra ` , .�
, � -�
�
�`� � � � �� � `�\ ��_'�
\/ � z �' r o
'! \� Y \f \� ' �l �' N.
� � \ � 0 : �\\ � � Z:
� �a3 �c�/�;�\\�� 3� �. � � _� .,\ . p.�
I �� � � �K� r \� ��- �� ; 1
6� �
�}�' i
r
\ \ \ \ ° L- � ) � j
L�II � fJ)' g � � � \�,�� �,
s�Z � m�� � �����,.
� i � - �\
' ;�� � rl+� �
8�� 7 _ Z� �
�g � , f •
r� ? ; � .
� a
� � ��j
L �F
� ��
A, ��.,�., 9102� GOLDEN PEAK HOUS� R�MODEL �,
�,.�,b,�„.,,,�„�.
o.r S/31/93 a,�„o,,,p,,,, �A�
—` . VAIL , COLORADO_ �`� '"�
� ,
r
• �
. ��
� x
� �
� Z >� a�
_ � i y
1
� �
� _ �
' � �.
v
�
r•
O
O =
�
�
z � �a s
�
�� �
0
e�
��
v 1
� ~
i
� � . ��
��
2
n�i, y
O ��
� Ri� �� O � � �Z
_ X! oc Q � y
` NI � c~ O
► �; �
�" 'L� '' � p .
� y� ? A. ,�
� 2
. p o '" � D
� ��� �� �
Z �
v
� �,
r o�
O "2
O � _�
7D / � h'-
D _ �
Z � �� -�
�
� '
Ir� � _ ��
l� � � ~ N�
� °z ,
�1
Q -� I
i
I
.� �i �
� y . i
°� Tm I
� Np
0 C
`? I
H� � �
c°� qy i
a L„ • v
z i
�S �
�� �
y I I
O
n� i
� I
i
i
i
�
I
I
1
.�µ.ro.. 9,�z i
a �. 5/31/93 GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �����•�. �
w � �,,�..�...�.. ,�.,��
VAIL , COLORADO °"�°' "°'
�
• •
�•
�ln (�_O , O � i
�
. ,,, ��_, �
m�----- � ,
� � �.�i
� ° ml� � :
.�__
� Z�� _ ��, � o �
�` a�� _Q �Q ° ,- °' li p
h 1 I- � '
8 mil ,�_-�_-� �� �I-- - ' ij � I
`L" r� o n
<I' �.� : 0 y �I 0 0
I � � 0 0
m � i�, p
;I� ���.� �� 0 � il
'� � � \
xi � � � � i� C 0
�I � 0;.t:� C� ;, r-1
' �I C� � -_ ��y !j �.�
� .� ,��� ;� � ;-� -
I 0 � =o :�.��;o .� - -� � _
� �I-_- _- � . _. _ 1�?�:�o� � :_�
i� Da
► ii BQQ.
� ii �0�
�r__
�, o �� =� _
�� � o. = �_o
� _ _
�I � 0 , � c I�-__- ,�� r'o
j; � � ° � ' a ��� �� o
o i� =� o
ii 0 0 0 ��� -
It3�
� I� -�`— . m �:_=
�---- = O �� �� r.h�--� `,
� !� :�i� �.�.o
x �- _
� � =o
� � � 'I _;'�
� - �� �
�I '�
. I � � �
'� 11l^ -
. �� ���Q �
,
!;� ��Q
� � o �° �=° � -- --
M N --- f�---�— r —
� �II _ �I � ��� �i
� ��� �� i� o ��.� -�
� I► =o !� a�� =°
a�I--- . ,� �_�� _; .
i �-�
� il I �.o J,o .
���---- ;; .� y � ° �� �
�ii = II -��'� = �
�� i =� I� ���_�� =° �
�----- _,O I� _ �°�,� ��� �
- .�.v .� �
O �::-O �1--- ---- I
;
�
r-�: . - �
�
� '°°"'""°°' 9'°z GOLDF `? '•`EAK HOUSE FiFAA�ODEL 5'°"'°°"°"°"°°"''"'"""'"a' i
� o.r 5/31/93 � rn,.°°"`""°'"" '°�°'°°'
.coa�.ao ��ar
VAI'. , " '.C�i�1D0 i
. .�.�.�,.a• �- _
i
�
� � � !
r �
; . .
1. �
�. .
Y ./ ,�
k ���\.�'
. �� � �
t �
' ,;
I i .�,ta�__
��� . ;»;
--n--
�r� a
c
c
�
•'� �.
� •
.�� p ��
� 1
;.f ��I �
.;�� , '•\
`��'
:�� o
��•', a
.�, y �_ .�
,i 4 � Q � a
u.
� ��
ji.�', ' . ' C . /�
�� !' �/ \
��li ! /
j;� � �� � /
'�,�� / ��i' ic.
\
\
O
`
. �
.
� Q� � .
\
�i '• � ��
M M C I \� .
� Z: �
_ o•
,- .�; �
° o �..
� .
ro�
rI>
Z�
.
, ��
M
,• � "°'""'�.' 9'°2� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �°°^�°���•�
yi Dw 5/31/93' ' w.c°on,,,°r,.r°"" ai�^m
__ VAIL ., COLORADO. .
j .
� �
/����`. '\
/�� �'�. ''�,
`... -. _
_ - �-____ � �
� F� � � .
�� �
�j�+. '� . �' � .
< ,i
�� ?. � �; �'�
� � � ^ �
F y
O
.+ L � F .o ,
,� I � __� \' , - �`i?,
_���� � � �� � -�
u F � �'�
a ' � � u i �'"r:\.
a O
fr �� ~ • O� `
�I�', 4 � �I \\'�
". 3�.
i� 0.. � '�' ..����
� ��.
I �� ;��d � '�.� ��:��,.
l. � � 'R y'
. . ��:; j�: � '
i • � \ �:�� ' /. I !
� �,,�\ ,,� , i 1 '
\ �� ��.�' i
i � ��
�. ���„ � , , i
i ' �.�`� . � � i
. :� �.�I ��
� �: r,a� ���� I! � �.
� r �. �� S� �� .
1 � �� � �� � �
�,• ; O� - . \ ' � �,
t � v I' !
' � ' II i�
, . i., I i
1. , �.
� '
��
a I �' �
• o
� ' „ . �;
�
� I
! �
' ' I, •
' �' i
� ,
, ,�"`�°" °,oi .('aOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL `�°°""°�°"""°�'
, � � �, a. ..�„
n �. 6����93 . VAIL' � COLORADO . �
fP. ._.
. � .
� � .
, /-•�., �
.�j. /�C
� �� -----,
�-
---� �--_-- ---
. � i .
' � i I
I
I
' �
�
' � ., i � ,i, r--�
�'i ��� �II'''' ` � .
�I �u�i �,�il' `��\\
� , ,
� i i ��qi'i �I � �\\�����\
ii
��q �V\����
I I�i il I�I I �\ ���\'..
� �� I I I' lil 1 \\\ �,
� �li��� �,���il�l������ �f � .
. . I III I���I I �I I i I \
I� ,;, , I Iif� �
�i \ \\�\ \
^! ��\�'� \� � \\`
��\. . '\
�,�;_ �,;\ \ , `�
��.�, , \\� 4 0 � ' �
�\�. :�•�� \\
I' / ��\\'� /'� �i ,�j; /"/
� .\\�\� �:%.
`\<�
�� �
\����' O
\.:
\ O�
T� � �� , . ' � �%�
i�� \ -n \\ ' ,� ,
M � \ \
I ,,
' � � i
r '�
o � �.
,
. �
r
D
Z
.r �
' 0
� N � .
I
, �
c '
a
i
r � �
�
'�
'� A� �°"""'°" 9102� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL S"�°°^�^°"°°""••"�
�' J o.o. 5/31/93: • . • w.c�m.�m o^+ +mam�
` -► VAIL � COLORADO
. �
� � � i
� r- ��-�i - --
t---� T_r ' _ - _
fi.— I__i - - --_ �it � I -- - '.� -
� - � - �
j � - _ -- �.Q i - '� 0
i �'�t ; �
I9
I_- �--�• _ �� �, I tl •
i ► -, - . �: ��� :ll � _ _ -
� • I � = _ } i , _ _ _; _T�---
I � .��. . (���) �
� r� ' � '_'_ V �I • {'i .7 _�_. _ .•,\�.
� I ' ,'r = ;I r� 'i - •,.
� _ � �� t:
�: ��_ - '__ ;:1-;- -. � .i{� ;::t _ ��
>` � �'' �' �:� �� � !} - - � .
a' I 1� � 3`. o� '4��+-- -- � _ .\� ..
� i '�" I ..__...�._.
al � r � •���U:• 'll' �. 'I _ _
� I •� : � :m k: �I
, I — :� •� ' _ i r��� �;. = = —
�— �� ; — -- i__�_ — � _ „%
. I l
;i � ;+ —
, �� , I �_ = � :� .
•'.� �� �:i
I a'� �1 : C' � .
'.;
. _� -_ .
. • • =- '. '�_ ..`� ' � . .'
� � . . ; � { ' ; ��r
. .� �. . �. ' � . � � :; �;�
. � � � ;: � � ��:
' . �. � ^�^*-'- _ •'
. . , .fi������ �i�
• ; �v''d'_ .. . ' .�'�
� • , •;; �
�� _ _ � , . � ��; � , • : �',• �' :'i
, • , ., � �
,i.
1� �
I ,
� �
i ��
� ��
I \\ �
_ �\ � ` .
_ . _�— �
�
� �. 4
��� �
I �
i \/
I � � " ,
i • i
I
! � � _- --- �
—_�._._. _,� __�
i _r--� ----- .-T l-._ __ �B s� --1-- � y���� ^
r� e
� � i$l�fi ` ��� �
� -%
I � ' � \\ �„::-.
� - -
� ' ��- � .
i , \k/ aT�• �
C_''�'` '" �
, � �r ~ �) � _ /
0
d� 1`����g /
� ' � � �
� `� -+--r�� "�+�--
� r � �
a \ �" � � /
0,.. `:. \ �_
; i �-- �� \ � �:::� i
��`__�.r
� � I � �
1 � I �j \� � � �- \ L-- -� �---7, ��
I '.� � � � � `
a I �, V ^ F��k�� � ��i� \ `�� ?�
i . I � �4'y,�T_�T � •\ `
r
� � ^ �������ls ��� Sx
.� �
�
I i Y \`,� .� \\ ,
. s ��� ���
���� . � `.
i ; _ �� �� ; .
��-- � �.,� �- ��
`�/ �. � � > � >
I ' ,�< ' --' ' , , ,
�-
i , �'
, � ���� ,
� � ., .
\ \
. �
� � \.
�� S
. \
// \ \\ �
, ` `� a
�;
�
m
o .D '�
'- > ��\
a
� \
o C e��� �
z
� �
�
, _
a
v
m
a
z
D
r
�
N
. �
' n '°°"""'°" 910� GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL �^�^°��ro.�
�,m.o...�.. ,�.�
..► on. 5/31/93 � �.wca,,.o, �we,
N VAIL � COLORADO
� � �
Retum to h1• r'�10���c,�
Town Planner
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT: ��cr� l�,,e_e�.,� /�a�u�-e
DATE SUBMITTED: �• 26• 93
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING /�. �..� 2� —.
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: —��qs�,o
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: �
a_e.e `��_ .
R DEFARTMENT
iewed by: �� � ��ce Date: = '� � `'
Comments:
• ) �==J/e�:� f��� .�.:==��R�':� �� i��/o���� �-��'� i�y��r�rG-r�t��-;e
,
.� � � , � .
v/�N/�'✓ e�1 � �,... /1/0:� Ji S, c�e � e�^/1 Z �
Z) � � ��/'1 �' s -
c°,`b'.✓ �2 /�vy J,,✓e"✓ /J c�-�/lm✓t�l'o/
���...� /'��-�-o /!�. � !� < <._ . ;
�;`� ' �! /d„.fc��j'� � v. �'/
�� � �<� /�y ��`��.2�='
�/ .-
�� �L/d!-'_�'''� ,��.�i v"`7� i/�/I�✓f ti 'c�./i '
��, �J � ,�r..Lo";"• 'a` L��'�y ���� ���i��
�/�Q-'q�J'` � S J'w i /
_. : �����rG'7^r 3 J � �1.i. �<: ..�.;-�?_7., . J�
�p��� ���L� 170 L�ir1•✓S/UG�� ��
�rl � ����:r�
� iGi �
{-� �,/J.��. G� 9 �';��/'? —
% �l, i"�:��
� ` . � �-,�t� t �v.c�� �
, ,� � �� �',"
, s�
� ��� �� �t�T�
�.�..a,,,�,�
.
• �` ' • .
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 303 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657
July 8, 1993
Mr. Mike Mollica, Senior Planner
Town of Vail Dept. of Community Development
75 So. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Golden Peak House
Mike:
Attached are letters we requested from the major tenant space owners in the Golden Peak House to
evaluate the employee housing impacts of our redevelopment plans for the building. These spaces are
those most affected by the proposed additional square footage being added to the building. Those
spaces affected are:
1. Hotel/Condominium expansion (Christiania Realty, Inc.)
2. RestauranbBar Expansion (Los Amigos)
3. New Commercial/Retail Expansion (Vail Associates, Inc.)
Other retail spaces certainly gain square footage, but in such small amounts that it will not affect their
staffing or operating procedures.
As indicated in the attached letters, the hotel/condominium management and maintenance will not be
affected by the residential expansion due to minimal staffing requirements; the same is noted for the
restaurant/bar expansion. The only area which does require additional employees is the new VAI/retail
space being created on the ground floor (customer lounge for private lessons). As noted, two
employees are estimated for this space.
The applicant (GPH Partners, Ltd.) has ownership of Unit 9D Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums (a two
bedroom condominium). This unit lies within the Town of Vail boundaries and would comply with Town
of Vail Employee Housing Unit (EHU) standards. The applicant is willing to commit this unit to the Town
as an EHU, should the expansion plans be approved by the Town of Vail PEC and Town Council.
This EHU should more than meet any employee housing requirements created by the Golden Peak
House Redevelopment.
If you have any questions, or need further information on this matter, please let me know.
Sincerely,
G� �G� .
Craig N. Snowdon, AIA
Partner
CNS/slh
cc: Clark Willingham
�y
� L'�J��2Sl1a111R �C'[1l1�1; Il1C. �
. 3>6��. llanson KrarT�c%� Krl.� �
l%��11, Coloradc� 81��7
(�03) �76-56•il 1�.�1,A" (3U3J ��7(�-l)�i7�i '
January 13, 1993
Mr. Clark Willingham
Golden Peak House
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Staff needs for remodeled Golden Peak House
Dear Clark:
After reviewing the proposed re-configuration of the Golden Peak
House Lodge, I am responding to your question concerning staffing
needs.
I would not anticipate any requirements for additional front desk
staff. One of the pitfalls of small lodges is the demand for a
front desk staff that could as easily handle 80 to 100 rooms.
One of the factors that makes estimating housekeeping needs
difficult is the high percentage of owner usage experienced in the
GPH. This minimizes daily maid requirements, but still requires
availability of personnel when owners request maid service. If an
owner does not rent their unit, this further reduces the need for
staffing. Considering the current mix of studios, owner usage and
non-rental units, I would not anticipate the need to increase the
staff of the GPH under the formula of current service levels.
There should be less "common area" requiring daily cleaning with
the elimination of the ramp.
I hope this response addresses all the questions you had. The
�ingle change that would affec.t staffing would be 24 hour coverage.
I would not, however, recommend such a drastic increase in desk
coverage for a property the size of the Golden Peak House.
Sinc
7
i
�'
i
Paul �./ Johnston
i✓
� � `/
. �� �
•� � ' 3
'�
228 Bridge Street � Vail, Colorado 81657 � 476-0080 o�tcE � 476-5847 x�s�ut�'r
Decembei'� 30 , 1992
Clark Willingham
1 Turtle Creek Village
Suite 606
Dallas, TX 75219-4471
Dear Clark:
I have reviewed the most recent' plans for the Golden Peak House
renovation and looked specifically at the Los Amigos space. You
asked that I address the issue of increased employees , due to
additional square footage , both in the basement and in the
restaurant itself . My conclusions are as follows :
1 ) The square footage in the basement , regardless o•f how much
or how little , will not add any employees . The reason is
that it will serve only as storage space.
2 ) The additional space in the restaurant will not increase
the number of employees due to two reasons : a) all
additional space inside. the restaurant is in the back of
the house ( i .e . kitchen area) and in the restrooms. The
increase in footage in the restrooms does not cause any
additional employees needs and b) any additional kitchen
space will be occupied by equipment not additional
employees .
Therefore , I do not believe there will be any additional employees
at Los Amigos after the renovation. If you need any further
information, please feel free to contact me .
Sincerely,
�
Michael D. taug �t n
MDS/clh
- �.
9
' � �
�Vailo ��
0
Vail Associates, Inc.
Creators and Operarors of Vail and Beaver CreelP' Resorcs
June 11, 1993
Mr. Craig Snowdon
Snowdon Hopkins Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Golden Peak House Redevelopment
Vail Associates, Inc. T,esson Customer Lounge
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
Dear Craig:
As requested, I have contacted Susie Tjossem with the Vail/Beaver
Creek Ski School to determine the number of employees who would
be required to staff the private lesson customer lounge, proposed
for the Golden Peak House redevelopment. .
According to Susie, two (2) new employees would be hired to
operate the lounge. As I 'm sure you are aware, this is a winter
seasonal operation however, these employees would be full time
during the ski season.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or
require additional information.
Sincerely, -
VA ASSO IATES, INC. cc: Chris Ryman
Susie Tjossem
Jack D. unn, Director �
Plan ing Design & Construction
.jd
JDHMISC. 56
Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA- (303) 476-5601
• �,.. �
.
�
GOLDEN PEAK HUUSE REMODEL
VAIL, COLORADO
A PYOposal for
Addition, Renovation and Expansion
May 31, 1993
PREPARED FOR:
THE TOWN OF VAIL AND THE GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ASSOCIATION
PREPARED BY:
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
. * • •
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31 , 1993
I . INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to present information regarding a
re-development proposal for the Golden Peak House located upon
Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing. These parcels
of land are located in the heart of Vail Village at the base of
the Vail Ski Area and the intersection of Bridge Street and
Hanson Ranch Road.
This report addresses the various requirements of the Town of
Vail Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations and is divided into
the following three sections :
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This section of the report describes the development proposal and
the existing conditions upon the site. Proposed development
statistics and standards are presented in this section as well as
impacts of the proposal . Zoning considerations are also
discussed.
DESIGN REGULATIONS
This section of the report describes the design intent of the
proposal and addresses compliance of the proposal with the Vail
Village Urban Design Considerations .
SZJNII�SARY
This section is a brief summary of the key points of the
proposal .
. � • �
Page 2
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Golden Peak House was constructed in 1966 and currently
consists of retail shops, bars and restaurants, a barber shop,
and 18 dwelling units (condominiums ) . Virtually no major upgrade
or renovation of the structure has been completed since the
building' s initial construction and the building is physically in
need of major renovation.
Coupled with the Association' s need to renovate and upgrade the
building physically is the overall Community need to upgrade the
building design in order to fit into what has become a certain
design "vocabulary" in Vail Village. The Golden Peak House is
architecturally very different from all other buildings within
Vail Village and was constructed with a roof form which is no
longer, and may never have been, appropriate for the prominent
site at the top of Bridge Street. A major aspect of this
development proposal is to renovate the structure in a manner
which results in a recognition of the distinctive design
character of Vail Village. These design aspects of the proposal
are discussed in the next section, Design Considerations, of this
report.
The redevelopment proposal for the structure consists of a total
renovation of the existing building which includes the major
modification of the roof to gable roof forms, the addition of
dormers, balconies, bay windows, arcades, and other architectural
projections resulting in a totally different appearance of the
building. In addition, the dining deck on the south side of the
building is proposed to be enlarged ( see Site Plan) . The
existing elevations of the building and proposed elevations are
shown.
The addition of the flat roofs and 3/12 pitch gable roof results
in the infill of the "valley" portions of the existing
"butterfly" roof structure. Consequently, this results in the
ability to construct a majority of the development within the
established envelope of the building.
As well as exterior changes to the structure, interior changes
are proposed which will result in more efficient use of space,
better circulation throughout the building, improved access, and,
most importantly of all, the ability to utilize the residential
units much better as guest accommodations with the addition of a
functional "hotel" lobby on the second floor level .
. � • �
� Page 3
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31 , 1993
A. DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
The following table indicates, numerically, the existing and
proposed floor areas for the Golden Peak House.
1993 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
BASEMENT FLOOR
"Retail" 3, 520 875 4, 395
"Los Amigos" 0 850 850
Common 795 650 1 , 445
4, 315 2 , 375 6, 690
GROUND FLOOR
Restaurant 0 45 45
Barber Shop 154 < 154> 0
Commercial/Retail 3, 812 2,283 6, 095
Common 1 , 567 <1 , 026> 665*
5, 533 1, 302 6, 805
SECOND FLOOR
Restaurant 1, 286 779 2 , 065
Dwelling Units
(8 existing/3 proposed) 2 ,499 31 2 , 530
Common 1 ,570 < 75> 1 , 495*
5, 355 735 6, 090
THIRD FLOOR
Dwelling Units
( 8 existing/6 proposed) 3, 760 815 4,575
Accommodation Units
( 0 existing/2 proposed) 0 590 590
Common 1 , 570 < 790> 780*
5, 330 615 5, 945
* Less 50 sq. ft. /floor for elevator
. � � �
' Page 4
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31 , 1993
1993 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
FOURTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
(2 existing/4 proposed
w/1 lock-off) 2 , 681 2, 929 5, 610
Accommodation Units
( 0 existing/0 proposed) 0 0 0
Common 125 355 480*
2, 806 3, 284 6, 090
FIFTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
(0 existing/1 proposed) 0 2, 700 2 , 700
Common 0 75 75*
0 2 , 775 2 , 775
GRAND TOTALS: 23, 339 11, 086 34, 395
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------
TOTALS BY USE:
Dwelling Units ( 14) 8, 940 6, 475 15, 415
Accommodation Units 0 590 590
Common 5, 627 < 687> 4, 940
Retail/Storage 7,486 3, 004 10, 490
Restaurant 1, 286 1, 674 2 , 960
* Less 50 sq. ft. /floor for elevator
, � � �
' Page 5
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
B. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The Golden Peak House is currently located within the Commercial
Core One Zone District. The combined site area of the two
existing lots which it occupies is 6, 915 square feet. The Golden
Peak House is currently located adjacent to the Agricultural and
Open Space Zone District which is indicated upon the Town of
Vail' s proposed Village Master Plan and Land Use Plan as Ski
Base/Recreation District.
In order to provide for the re-development of the Golden Peak
House it is proposed that this area be re-zoned to a Special
Development District ( SDD) . As stated in the Vail Zoning Code,
"the purpose of Special Development Districts is to encourage
flexibility in the development of land in order to promote its
most appropriate use, and to improve the design, character and
quality of new development" . It is believed that through a
Special Development District, this parcel of land can be
developed to meet both the objectives of the property owners and
the overall Community and result in a high quality development
which will be an asset to the Town of Vail .
The base "underlying" zone district for the SDD will be CC1
(Commercial Core One) since the uses proposed correspond to this
zone district.
As in any Special Development District, the development
standards, including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height,
density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking are as
indicated upon the Development Plans and are determined by the
Planning and Environmental Commission and approved by the Town
Council .
The Development Standards for the proposed SDD are as follows :
Lot Area:
The total size of the SDD will be 8, 361 square feet. This shall
include the existing overhang easements no. 1, 2 and 3 ( 1,449 sq.
ft. ) as indicated upon the Site Plan and Lots A and B, Block 2,
Vail Village First Filing ( 6, 912 sq. ft. ) .
Site Dimensions:
The site dimensions will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Setbacks•
Setbacks will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
, • � �
� Page 6
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31 , 1993
Height:
Building height will be as indicated upon the building elevations
which is 49 feet at the highest point of the gable roof located
in the eastern portion of the Development; and 41 feet at the
highest point in the western portion of the Development.
Densitv•
Density will be as indicated on the Development Plans .
Site Coverave:
Site coverage will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Landscapinq:
Landscaping will be as shown on the Landscape Plan and as finally
approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board.
ParkinQ•
Parking will be calculated in accordance with the Town of Vail
Zoning Code and additional spaces required will be provided for
by contribution to the Town Parking Fund.
Permitted Use•
Permitted uses, conditional uses, and accessory uses will be
those specified with the CC1 Zone District.
Other applicable zoning issues relating to CC1 are addressed in
this proposal .
. • � �
Page 7
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
C. IMPACTS
The Town of Vail Department of Community Development has
requested that the potential changes or impacts resulting from
the proposal be evaluated according to the following identified
conditions .
Hydrologic Conditions:
The only hydrologic condition which will change as a result
of the proposal is an improvement of the various surface
drainage conditions both around the perimeter of the site
and upon the building itself . Roof drainage will be
substantially upgraded with the building renovation as well
as the installation of a new surface drainage system around
the building which will be designed to improve existing
drainage problems .
Atmospheric Conditions:
The renovation of the building will result in the addition
of gas fireplaces which will meet Town of Vail standards and
five existing wood burning fireplaces will be upgraded in
the proposal.
Geologic Conditions:
There will be no impact upon land forms, slopes, soils, or
potential hazards resulting from the proposal .
Noise and Odor•
There will be no significant impact upon these environmental
conditions . A potential exists that the upgrade of
restaurant kitchen facilities ( such as exhaust fans ) could
reduce any current odors which might exist from these
facilities . Any noise which might emanate from the outdoor
dining area will conform to Town of Vail standards regarding
noise levels .
Visual Conditions:
Visual changes resulting from this proposal are discussed
within the next section, Design Considerations, of this
report.
Land Use Conditions:
The proposal will clear up an existing conflict in land use;
by eliminating residential use overhanging agricultural/open
space and bring the property into compatibility with
officially approved land use and open space policies and
objectives . The land uses proposed are entirely consistent
with adopted and proposed land use plans .
• � �
Page 8
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
Circulation and Transportation Conditions:
In terms of pedestrian circulation the proposal results in a
very positive impact due to the upgrade of the major access
to Vail Mountain which exists between the Golden Peak House
and the Hill Building. Drainage, grades, and surface
condition improvements all will enhance the pedestrian flow
through this area. Delivery conditions will be improved by
the removal of the existing trash dumpsters in the skier
access way.
. • � �
� Page 9
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
III. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
As mentioned in the previous section of the report, a certain
distinctive design character has evolved within Vail Village
which, through the implementation of the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan, is encouraged to be followed in the
redevelopment of existing structures . The following responds to
the stated Design Considerations and describes how the proposal
will be consistent with the established character of Vail Village
and Bridge Street and how the proposal will make positive
contributions to the quality of life.
Desiqn Statement:
The Golden Peak House Building is one of the most prominent
buildings in Vail Village. It is located at the "top" of Bridge
Street and serves as visual focus for pedestrians moving up
Bridge Street. The building is a contemporary mid-60 ' s design
with an inverted roofline that is out of context with its
surrounding neighbors and the village environment. The roofline
and the north facade make the building read as a sheer vertical
wall cutting off the street from Vail Mountain. The building has
fallen into disrepair and features cracked and peeling stucco,
plywood balconies in need of repair or replacement, and other
general areas of decline. It is a prime candidate for a major
redesign.
In redesigning the Golden Peak House it is important to address
the building' s verticality and somewhat imposing vertical scale
(5 stories) . Also, the building' s cold and hard relationship
with Bridge Street, i. e. its "meeting with grade" . This
relationship with grade is equally important on the mountain side
and west traffic corridor.
The building is in great need of a renewed identity that meshes
with the architecture of Vail Village. A gable roof is the most
reasonable approach to blending the building into the Village.
The upper floors on the Hanson Ranch Road side have been set back
for the enhancement of street enclosure and sun/shade
considerations .
By creating a covered arcade-like north facade at grade with a
more articulated horizontal facade, the building will both meet
the street in a more human scale and provide a horizontal base.
The extension also breaks the overpowering verticalness of the
present arrangement. It is logical that this horizontal base of
windows turn the corner and continue along the west elevation,
creating interest and interaction at a human scale between the
building and the ski traffic moving through to the mountain.
Development of this "throat" or narrow passage will need special
treatment and coordination between all adjoining property owners
and comply with the new guidelines established by the latest Town
of Vail streetscape plan.
. • � �
' Page 10
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
Verticality is less of an issue at the south elevation because
grade is one level higher. The roofline on the south is
therefore more capable of taking large openings (windows) and
horizontal influence is less needed or required. The south
elevation should present a pleasant and exciting character in
equal response to the activity and excitement of the Vista Bahn.
The building offers great and exciting potential for a very
successful and pleasing re-design. It can be re-designed to meet
the needs of the owners and to achieve congruence with the
architectural context of Vail Village.
Pedestrianization:
Pedestrianization of upper Bridge Street and of the Vista Bahn
access alley will be improved with the proposal. The building' s
varying front facade at grade, and the covered arcade-like canopy
will draw people to the building. The skier access alleyway will
be cleaned up with the removal of trash dumpsters, improved
drainage, and upgraded ground surface materials . This area is a
viable public art site as it will become a mini-plaza inviting
the pedestrian to enter, experience, and move through.
Streetscape Framework:
The streetscape framework will be greatly improved with the
addition of bay windows, and the arcade-like roof canopy. These
architectural features will be more in keeping with the Urban
Design Guide Plan and other existing buildings in the Village.
The bay windows will be covered with a soffit varying from 3 feet
to 6 feet of overhang. The overhang soffit will give a protected
intimate environment for the window viewer. The changing
overhang condition (varying depth) will create an interesting
space to experience as opposed to one consistent window and
overhang relationship for the 110 linear feet of store front.
The Streetscape Framework will have the added interest of the
large gabled roof at the entry to the Golden Peak House Lodge
(main entry) and secondary roofs (5) at the entries to major
building tenants . Similar entry canopies have been utilized on
the remodeled Plaza Building with successful results . In
addition, canopy awnings will be located over entries to minor
shops .
Street Enclosure:
The street enclosure will be enhanced by the more human scaled
bay windows, and entry canopies . The enclosure will feel
somewhat lessened by the proposed stepping back of upper floors .
The sheer vertical north facade will feel much less vertical.
Also the gabled roof form will give a more varied, interesting
upper enclosure than the present long horizontal line of the roof
of the existing east mass . The enclosures stepping back will
mitigate the sheer verticality of the buildings north facade,
reducing it from a 5 story building to a 4 story facade stepping
back to a more modest 5th floor with small dormers .
. - • �
' Page 11
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31 , 1993
The skier access alley will become a semi-enclosed mini plaza
with potential placement for benches, landscaping or public art
locations as developed by the latest Town of Vail Streetscape
Plan.
Street EdQe•
Street edge will be greatly enhanced. Snowmelted brick pavers
will meet the building edge at grade and the in and out offsets
of the protected bay windows, and building entry ways will add
much needed interest. The elimination of the service stair from
grade down to the basement at the northeast corner of the
building will greatly increase the linear footage of street edge
with bay windows adding transparency. Small planters on grade
and planter boxes will add color and charm to the street edge.
The skier access plaza can be a feature "pocket" area and
surfaces will be greatly improved and benches and landscaping can
be added to tie into the latest Town of Vail Streetscape Plan.
Building Height/Views and Focal Points:
The proposed gable roof additions will only be 4 feet and 5 feet
higher (at the Ridge Line) than the highest points of the
existing roofs on the east and west building masses . The gable
roofs pitch down at a 3/12 pitch to points along the current roof
height. The west mass infills the existing open end of the
butterfly roof form. The western-most sidewall height is
unchanged.
The focal point of the Riva Ridge Ski Run is maintained from most
Bridge Street view points, and further analysis will demonstrate
that the mountain view will be enhanced by the reduction of flat
building mass . The 3/12 gable roof form, as recommended by the
Design Considerations is more in keeping with the architectural
fabric of Vail Village and will be a major improvement to upper
Bridge Street. The new roof form has been designed and placed
over the existing building masses as carefully and considerately
as possible. It is felt that the minimal increases are far
outweighed by the advantages gained.
Views from the new Vail Parking Garage demonstrate minimal
encroachments into the established view corridor No. 1 .
. - • �
� Page 12
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
Sun/Shade•
The proposed building design will minimally impact the sun/shade
relationship on Seibert Circle and upper Bridge Street. By
stepping the upper floors back the sun angle (50°) hits less of
the building at the points of critical shadow impact. These
studies will be further analyzed as the planning process
proceeds .
Service and Deliverv:
Deliveries as well as trash pick-up will be at the northeast
corner of the building. The existing dumpsters located in the
Vista Bahn access alley will be eliminated. A trash compaction
unit will be installed in the basement and the trash dumpsters
will be lifted to the main level with a new service elevator.
The elevator will replace the exterior service stairway at
approximately the same location. Removal of the trash dumpsters
from the alley will greatly improve the high traffic, busy
pedestrian area.
Sub Area Concepts:
Two Sub-Area Concepts are indicated within the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan which relate to the development proposal . The
first of these concepts is #3 . 2 which discusses a renovation to
improve the pedestrian scale at the base of the building and to
provide for greater transparency as an activity generator on
Seibert Circle. The Vail Town Council has previously determined
that this design concept should not be accomplished by means of
the ten foot encroachment onto public right-of-way as encouraged
by the original Guideplan. The Council indicated that they would
prefer to attempt to achieve these goals through a combination of
bay windows, overlays, and other architectural projections on the
facade of the building. In response to this direction the
current proposal has improved the pedestrian scale utilizing
these features and providing increased transparency while not
encroaching at ground level on to Town property with enclosed
space.
. - • �
� Page 13
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
Sub-area concept #3 . 3 indicates improvements to Seibert Circle as
well as an area for "mountain gateway improvements" including
landscaping and a minor plaza. As mentioned previously the
proposal includes these features within the identified area and
the result will be a greatly improved "gateway" to Vail Mountain
and tie into the Town of Vail latest streetscape plan.
� �
• � Page 14
Golden Peak House Remodel
May 31, 1993
IV. SUMMARY
The proposal results in the accomplishment of the following major
goals :
1 ) The redevelopment of one of Vail ' s most prominent
locations in a manner which is consistent with the Vail
Village Urban Design Guideplan;
2 ) A substantial improvement of site and landscape
conditions in an area which is the major portal to Vail
Mountain.
It is clear when reviewing the developmental proposal that this
is truly a project in which everyone benefits . The Golden Peak
House Association benefits from the major upgrade and renovation
of the building in terms of bringing the building into
conformation with current building codes and life safety
requirements, the overall community benefits in terms of the
major upgrade and enhancement of an area which is currently an
eyesore, and, most importantly, the Vail visitor benefits by the
improvement of the Vail Village experience which will be improved
both aesthetically and functionally leaving a lasting impression
of a high quality experience.
. �
�
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planninq and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on August 23, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for a site coverage variance to aliow for an additional covered entry to an
existing residence located at 1547-A Springhill Lane/Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Valley 2nd
Filing.
Applicants: Frank and Marlene Rembert
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
2. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the
exnansion nf th? �!ail AthlFti� rl��h, Inratecl at 35? East Me�do�v Drive, and mnre
speafically described as foilows:
A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Tract B; thence N 79°46'00" W along the Northerly line of Vail
Village, First Filing, and along the Northerly line of said Tract B 622.86 feet; thence S 06=26'52"W a
distance of 348.83 feet to the Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as
recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said corner also
being the True Point of Beginning; thence S 79°04'08" E and along the Southerly line of said parcel 200.00
feet to the Southeast comer thereof; thence N 62`52'00" E and along the Northerly line of that parcel of land
described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78
feet to the Northeasterly comer of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly right-of-way line of
Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27°13'37" W a distance of 77.37 feet
along said Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road;thence N 89°29'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to
the Northeasterly corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10,
1966 and tiled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesterly 26.51 feet along
the arc of a 37.50 teet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40�30'00" whose chord bears N
53°40'00" W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thenre N 73`55'00" W and along said tangent
166.44 teet; thence N 85`10'21" W a distance of 50.40 feet to the Northsti�esterly corner of the Mountain
Haus Parcel; thence S 02°18'00" W and along the easterly line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of
100.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner thereof; thence S 45°13'53" E a distance of 38.70 feet to the True
Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet, more or less.
Applicant: Vail Athletic Club
Planner: Shelly Mello
. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District,
a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
� ' •
�
4. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot
18, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing/325 Forest Road.
Applicant: Timothy Drisko
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
5. A request for a worksession for proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District, and Chapter 18.32 Agricuitural and Open
Space District, of the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
6. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver
Dam Circle.
Applicant: Leo Payne
Planner� Jim CumiittP
7. A request for variances for wall heights, construction in an area with slopes in excess
of 40% and parking in the front setback and an amendment to the approved
development plan for the Briar Patch Condominiums, located at 1398 Buffehr Creek
Road/Lot F, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 2.
Applicant: Briar Patch Condominiums
Planner: Shelly Mello
8. A request for a minor subdivision, a request for a variance from Section 18.13.050
buildable area, and a request for a rezoning from the High Density Multi-Family to the
Primary/Secondary Residential zone district for a property located at Lot 4, Block 3,
Bighorn Subdivision Filing No. 3/4333 Bighom Road.
Applicant: BAB Partnership
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
9. A request for a modification to the conditional use permit for the snow dump to allow
an expansion of the road located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/an unplatted parcel located
west of the Town of Vail shops.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
�� �
... .r
GOLDEN PBAK HOUSE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
REVISED 8�J,8/.93
��'�'� f��t� ,.
Filinq: Vail Village Fifth Filinq ��g�,
Block: 2
Lot: D (part of) :
Tract:
Parcel:
Christiana Lodge, Inc.
356 E. Hanson Ranch Road
f Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Villaqe Fifth Filing
Block: 2
Lot: D (part of) : �f�I��_ �C��-�-5
Tract: �
Parcel: � �.A�'
Jon and Mary L. Shirley
Vail Trust � •
Box 685
✓ Medina, CA 98039
Filing: Vail Village Fifth Filing �
Block: 2
Lot: D1 ,
Tract:
Parcel:
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road � �
,� Vail, CO 81657 �
Filinq: Vail Village Fifth Filing
Block: 2
Lot: E
Tract:
Parcel:
Robert and Diane Lazier
� Box 627
Vail, CO 81658
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 1
Tract:
Parcel:
Martha Head
/ 21 Blythwood Road �
J Baltimore, NID 21210
. � � . � � 4
�r
Filing: Vail Villaqe First Filinq
Block: 1
Lot: 2
Tract:
Parcel:
Howard & Judith Berkowitz
888 7th Avenue
� New York, NY 10106
Filinq: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 3
Tract:
Parcel:
Jerome & Martha Lewis
410 17th Street �
Suite 1600
� Denver, CO 80202
Filinq: Vail Villaqe First Filinq �
Block: 1 �
Lot: 3 ,
Tract:
Parcel:
Maurice 0. Rinehardt
/ P.O. Box 5397
Lighthouse Point, FL 33074
Filing: Vail Villaqe First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 4 �
Tract: �
Parcel:
Jay A. Precourt
1560 Broadway
Suite 2000
/Denver, CO 80202 �
Filing: Vail Villaqe First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 5
Tract:
Parcel:
Richard D. Bass
601 Elm Street �
uite 4224
Dallas, TX 75201
� .
. . • � �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 13
Tract:
Parcel:
Barbara Osborne
c/o Keith S. Jennings
1531 Walnut Street
� Philadelphia, PA 19102
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 1
Tract:
Parcel:
P & R Enterprises
8 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 10
Tract:
Parcel:
George Washington Knox
�V91 Bridge Street
ail, CO 81657
, Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 11
Tract:
Parcel:
B. A. Jr. & Barbara Bridgewater
8400 Maryland Avenue
St. Louis, M0 63105
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 12
Tract:
Parcel:
Robert & Mary B. Galvin
Rolling Oaks Farm
Route 68
Barrington, IL 60010
. ' � � �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 13A
Tract:
Parcel:
N.J. & Llewllyn Nicholas
/ 50 Central Park, W.
New York, NY 10023
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 13B
Tract:
Parcel:
N.J. & Llewllyn Nicholas
50 Central Park, W.�
, New York, NY 10023
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 2A
Tract:
Parcel:
Richard K. Parker
44 South Birch Street
/Denver, CO 80222
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 28
Tract:
Parcel:
James M. Todd
R.M. & Barbara D. Euwer
/ 5737 South Gallup Street ,
Littleton, CO 80120
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 2C
Tract:
Parcel:
Sam and Nancy Gary
370 17th Street
� Suite 5300
Denver, CO 80202
, , � � �
. , •.
Filinq: Vail V111aqe First Filinq
Block: 1
Lot: 6
Tract:
Parcel:
G. Peck & Company
1600 Broadway
Suite 2100
,� Denver, CO 80202
Filinq: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 7
Tract:
Parcel:
W. Grant Williams
/ �2 Ladue Lane
�/ St. Louis, MO 63124
Filinq: Vail Villaga First Filing .
Block: 1
Lot: 8 �
Tract: \
Parcel:
Ron & Nancy Slaughter
P.O. Box 1508 � �
� San Angelo, TX 76902 -
Filing: Vail Village First Filinq �
Block: 1
Lot: 10 �
Tract: _
Parcel:
tephen S. Redding & Angela Redding
P.O. Box 1274
Santa Barbara, CA 93117
;.. .t
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 1
Lot: 11
Tract:
Parcel:
Frances Gunn
3101 Valley Oak Drive �
Loveland, CO 80538
. • ' � �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 2D
Tract:
Parcel:
R.K. And Nancy S. Parker
44 South Birch Street
� Denver, CO 80222
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 3A
Tract:
Pnrcel:
Olive C. Watson
IBM Corporation
�ld Orchard Road
� Armonk, NY 10504
Filinq: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 3B
Tract:
Parcel:
Stuart Colton
� 232 Hartshorn Drive
/ Shorthills, NJ 07078
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 4A
Tract:
Parcel:
Robert and Deanne Tucker
/ 31033 Buttermilk Court
� Evergreen, C0 80439
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 4B
Tract:
Parcel:
JRH-1 Trust
4600 South Monroe Lane
Englewood, CO 80110
�
, � ' • �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 5
Tract:
Parcel:
Thomas Pritzker
Madison Plaza
�00 W. Madison
hicago, IL 60606
Filing: Vail Village First Filinq
Block: 5
Lot: 6
Tract:
Parcel:
Margretta Parks
� 0. Box 37312
/Denver, CO 80237
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 7
Tract:
Parcel:
Marion M. Lloyd
2 060 St. Marys Road
ibertyville, IL 60048
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 8
Tract:
Parcel:
Anthony & Constance M. Ridder
1801 W. 27th Street
�Munset Island
iami, FL 33140 �
c . •
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: 9
Tract:
Parcel:
Walter Patrick Gramm
695 Prospect Street
Winetka, IL 60093
. • ' � �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5
Lot: B&C
Tract:
Parcel:
Rodney Slifer
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filinq
Block: 5
Lot: D&E
Tract:
Parcel:
Gorsuch, Ltd.
John McBride
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: A&B
Tract:
Parcel:
286 Bridge Street, Inc.
701 Southeast 6th Avenue
Delray, FL 33483
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: E&F
Tract:
Parcel:
Rucksack, Inc.
288 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: H
Tract:
Parcel:
Oscar Tang
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
�
. • ' � �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: H
Tract:
Parcel:
Charles Rosenquist
P.O. Box 686
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: H
Tract:
Parcel:
Richard Brown
1780 South Bellaire
Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: H-Red Lion Condo #3
Tract:
Parcel:
Jon Shirley
2019 Evergreen Point
Medina, WA 98039
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: I
Tract:
Parcel:
Mill Creek Court Condo Association
c/o Slifer Management Company
143 E. Meadow Dr. - Suite 360
Vail, CO 81657 �
Filing: Vail Village First Filinq
Block: 5A
Lot: J
Tract:
Parcel:
Villa Vahalla Condominium Assoc.
c/o Christiana
P.O. Box 758
Vail, CO 81658
F
, � ' � •
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5A
Lot: K
Tract:
Parcel:
Galitan Lodge
c/o The Hare Group
3170 Sheiks Place
Colorado Springs, CO 80904
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5B
Lot: B&C
Tract:
Parcel:
Covered Bridge Building
Hillis Aiken
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5B
Lot: D&I
Tract:
Parcel:
Pepi Gramshammer
231 East Gore Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5B
Lot:
Tract: A (part of)
Parcel:
Creekside Condominiums Assoc.
c/o Vail Management Company
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657 �
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5B
Lot:
Tract: A (part of)
Parcel:
Belltower Partners, Ltd.
P.O. Box 68
Vail, CO 81658
f
• ' � •
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5B
Lot:
Tract: A (part of)
Parcel:
Gore Creek Plaza Building
c/o Vail Management Company
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Filinq: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: A (part of)
Tract:
Parcel:
Blanche Hill
311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: A
Tract:
Parcel:
Lodge at Vail
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: 8
Tract:
Parcel:
Wall Street Building Associates
c/o Robert and Diane Lazier
386 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, CO 81657 '
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: C
Tract:
Parcel:
Margretta Parks
(Cyranos Building)
P.O. Box 37312
Denver, CO 80237
� -
• ' � •
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: C resub
Tract:
Parcel:
One Vail Place Condo Association
c/o Blanche Hill
311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: C resub
Tract:
Parcel:
Hong Kong Cafe Bldg.
1183 Cabin Circle Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: D&F
Tract:
Parcel:
Bridge Street Bldg. Condo Assoc.
c/o Brandess/Cadmus Real Estate
281 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657 ,
Filing: Vail Village �'irst Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: G&R
Tract:
Parcel:
Plaza Lodge Association
P.O. Box 68
Vail, CO 81658
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block: 5C
Lot: I
Tract:
Parcel:
Hill Building
Ms . Cortlandt Hill
311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
� ,
. � � �
(
Filinq: Vail Village First Filinq
Block: 1
Lot:
Tract: E
Parcel:
Vail Associates, Inc.
Joe Macy
Box 7
Vail, CO 81658
Filing: Vail Village First Filing
Block:
Lot:
Tract:
Parcel: Parcel C:
U. S. Forest Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, CO 81645
. � C ���-� ���
- � ��� ��� s�
�HRISTIANIA LODGE, INC. JON & MARY SHIRLEY ROBERT & DIANE LAZIER
356 E. HANSON RANCH RD. P.O. BOX 565 P.O. BOX 627
VAIL, CO 81657 MEDINA, CA 98038 VAIL, CO 81658
MARTHA HEAD HOWARD & JUDY BERKOWITZ JEROME & MARTHA LEWIS
21 BLYTHWOOD ROAD 888 7TH AVENUE 410 17TH ST., SUITE 1600
BALTIMORE, MD 21210 NEW YORK, NY 10106 DENVER, CO 80202
MAURICE O. RINEHARDT JAY A. PRECOURT RICHARD D. BASS
P.O. BOX 5397 1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 2100 1601 ELM STREET, #4224
LIGHTHOUSE PT., FL 33074 DENVER, CO 80202 DALLAS, TX 75201
G. PECK & CO. W. GRANT WILLIAMS RON & NANCY SLAUGHTER
1600 BROADWAY, #2100 #2 LADUE LANE P.O. BOX 1508
DENVER, CO 80202 ST. LOUIS, MO 63124 SAN ANGELO, TX 76902
STEPHEN & ANGELA REDDING FRANCES GUNN BARBARA OSBORNE
P.O. BOX 1274 3101 VALLEY OAK DR. % KEITH S. JENNINGS
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93117 LOVELAND, CO 80538 1531 WALNUT STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102
P & R ENTERPRISES GEORGE WASHINGTON KNOX MR. & MRS. BRIDGEWATER
288 BRIDGE STREET 291 BRIDGE STREET 8400 MARYLAND AVENUE
VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657 ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
ROBERT & MARY GALVIN N.J. & LLEWLLYN NICHOLAS RICHARD K. PARKER
ROLLING OAKS FARM, RTE. 68 59 CENTRAL PARK WEST 44 S. BIRCH STREET
BARRINGTON, IL 60010 NEW YORK, NY 10023 DENVER, CO 80222
JAMES M. TODD SAM & NANCY GARY R.K. & NANCY PARKER
R.M. & BARBARA D. EUWER 370 17TH STREET, #5300 44 S. BIRCH STREET
5737 S. GALLUP STREET DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80222
LITTLETON, CO 80120
�� �C�%��c3 � �C�C��v �� C�.c�f'
� �
STUART COLTON ROBERT & DEANNE TUCKER
232 HARTSHORN DRIVE 31033 BUTTERMILK COURT
SHORTHILLS, NJ 07078 EVERGREEN, CO 80439
JRH-1 TRUST THOMAS PRITZKER MARGRETTA PARKS
4600 S. MONROE LN. 200 W. MADISON P.O. BOX 37312
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 CHICAGO, IL 60606 DENVER, CO 80237
MARION M. LLOYD MR. & MRS. RIDDER WALTER PATRICK GRAMM
25060 ST MARY'S RD. 1801 W. 27TH ST. 695 PROSPECT STREET
LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048 SUNSET ISLAND WINETKA, IL 60093
MIAMI, FL 33140
RODNEY SLIFER GORSUCH, LTD. 286 BRIDGE ST., INC.
230 BRIDGE STREET 263 E. GORE CREEK DR. 701 SOUTHEAST 6TH AVE.
VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657 DELRAY, FL 33483
RUCKSACK, INC. OSCAR TANG CHARLES ROSENQUIST
288 BRIDGE STREET 100 PARK AVENUE P.O. BOX 686
VAIL, CO 81657 NEW YORK, NY 10017 VAIL, CO 81658
RICHARD BROWN JON SHIRLEY MILL CREEK CT. CONDO ASSOC
1780 S. BELLAIRE, #106 2019 EVERGREEN POINT % SLIFER MGMT. CO.
DENVER, CO 80222 MEDINA, WA 98039 143 E. MEADOW DR., #360
VAI L, CO 81657
VILLA VAHALLA CONDO ASSOC THE HARE GROUP HILLIS AIKEN
P.O. BOX 758 3170 SHEIKS PLACE 174 GORE CREEK DR.
VAIL, CO 81658 COLO SPGS, CO 80904 VAIL, CO 81657
PEPI GRAMSHAMMER CREEKSIDE CONDO ASSOC BELLTOWER PARTNERS, LTD.
231 E. GORE DRIVE % VAIL MGMT CO. P.O. BOX 68
VAIL, CO 81657 201 GORE CREEK DR. VAIL, CO 81658
VAI L, CO 81657
GORE CREEK PLAZA BLDG. BLANCHE HILL LODGE AT VAIL
% VAIL MGMT. CO. 311 BRIDGE STREET 174 GORE CREEK DR.
201 GORE CREEK DR. VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
VAI L, CO 81657
1
� - �ywyr• ' ' :.
,�►�"� RI� t.i
1
..JV�'
.,��'� ,�i�
�vY'
`� ..
�; w1�', _' 'r:-,
:'i�ts . ,�.
. ~ ��
—. �N\-.
+C' ����� ' _
_�-' —
�'o;F
' �. _� -. 7 ��', ..,
� - �. � � ;:v� . z .. _
' 7„e�.,�.: , _ �
' �. . . +.,' .J _
__ ' � � y
�. � 4
• ,e�.- -� �� ,_ >...
.p� � .t� . � �-
. . .
-- � 'f'�:teZ� i �.,.. l� � "� �y,. �,-+Y:},
. ��� � - �� , � �F � �� �. � �.
,+� r'� -; ,,, x� t'
.r -r,� � �_. =s.
y 4 ;�� �� ���`' a�i�Va�r: ' _ !
,�.? j ` �';
Er '��i�' �
; �!�
►
,
� � .
v.,
� , � �.
� �:�; ��
�
�_ .� ,.
;f . 1 �� _ u.
i :' � i
�_ � ` � � � y�:
.�';`I ��`. t -� �,. .
( `• ,
�,o \ �.
u ;�. `� —..._ —:r= -
—�, — `".�
� s� �F� . , ���,' r
t. :, . .�.���.. ,,,,,,,, � , �; ��� .
,11 ��%j , .� � � � _ - � ��' �"'„�� �_ _-
+� �� �, ' l }` i � � �• �,l �+ 1�,
�' �� �-.`. .�.
� , �� _
�F
x�;�dt�. ' , ..
- 4
�.
..S .
�}�, R f
b�y�J
:°�a�{'� -
t_ �
:�;a. �
�: y _ .
f - ��•�' ,J.
�,,,�► �� ,,,; - /Y !"�. '-
�rrrr��� p�� �+� � �_ � �- :
r,� � ,F �.4 i. . I I � � �.
/"�� �., y' i_ - '
� � � �. r"
N� �'
;ti� . ,-`���� �:.= ! "
� .j.�(�ir'__ - .. . c•. . __ . �s� .� ; � `t \
1 � �:"� � � � �'�►.����.
•�..;.. '/ � i+�.- --- ��R �� ''� r,... ' .�y►
' '���'���.�= - - , '� � -�� � ����
�■ � . .. '� �A� �``_ • 1'��.��. . � ._ . . - �• �^
r
�
--------
�_
,
- .,�:,�- . .. ..__. . - .._ . _ a
. _ - .
.1:._�- 4.,
,.
. ��
f� ,
�
1 � _
� !
��1
'� '�
'{. �_ :,.+ .
+�
� _ 1
Y.�� ' ;�: ,y , 1 .
�i T s ' ��;� � ; , _
� � � '�:;� . �,`!� .,
,
i■ , ��' .•+ ;,. y �,� , � r� , �
� ` :ir '� '
� �� � � ��" �� 'r-- s �' �.
� I ,_,� �x. � ...--* "- � _
i l . ^.�.
� . = `�"'a��'� � � "`'`
��_ F ,' � �. � ._., � � , S , .•a1�.4•�,.
.*: � I' � i;�+ `�,A �
� ,� .�.��� i , .
,�� �� � t.. '� .' � r+' (.�` _ • .�. Y
��w ~ '''M'� .wr, .�*�""";_-. •� .�� r •�.- � ��
,�, �!.�..,��;�i
��lfr..�''�+� .
_%^'����� . j,
r!
�R.� „
�� ����
'.f•��.�°1 t�' ��i,. .'.
��p ���_. �'r
�::):`b
1
�111 • , ♦y
�����•� �,��t. y- .
���.��i'� Y � J� �� �
V.�,� �:� �' �v..�. �0",�
������ --- _ �, � �,:. -. ,,,�,-
�I �,' ,-�����.
� ,- -- - '-� -- � �;�. �-
� ., :,: - �' _
y .�� ' .+„� „� �'�-i� ��-
'sa>> ,� -s„
a.:.
. ..E R ��i_��'T � ,4� .. �: * .
�• � � -_
. , �
Y( �
. , 17Fy , . �
' � � . _� � Y � ...... �._...... .
� '�}'J�!F'� - s ' � � � ' ��.��, /
.. .
t-
.i. .
•� " ww..wwwn � ........
� � �
"+=„
:i
�� '
�.. ? x` �:. �-}� � . - -
-.s 3�:.
�
, . . �-. r .:. _, .......
y.
- �:��.'. s..:. _. ._: "-<
..- r' . '. - . ..,_ .;
. .: �. :..... r..+�...
� .�,� �� `�1i .j°i"� g wr"••w. . .
..�
='`�t.
\\ '.rf�., .r ����i�
-._. ._�_ . .'_..- "�, ' `. .:�,�-'
` }:
^�_ I i � L.
_ �.��;_ �
} � � �� r ��f�`I ' , �S .: r
;.,,�, <r_ts.,.,, �i'.
=�.. f _. .:
_` ` ° `" „`:,,�,�rr �-r=`."` � .a i
�Y +' ' ���� ���, ,�� Z'- � ti"'~� � �`i .�
�� ;":'\.�,, � �..� •,..�'`;; �a.. .:�s-
�� � � rr.�.. . • � :�y„ " ,� ,, -.`'� i:
- .� : ; �ti .. t � . � P.: � � -'±i:i- .sr*
_�,,` R '�. � �!l►�w:� -.JI• � .`�3. '�,". ' �'. ��.w�a,�•�_��.��
. '�.�1� �'' .s� � ` � � ..� � f'� - f,-�.
- � :i'. .,��r �rc*. ��.l�,�y;. ' ,, nw 5. .:�.�� j .. -��'�j�R'�"'�'..��.
.�:, ��� �y.;�'�^,",:��.�-ti.� �► .,3 u:�.�;,�:�'�"���i
_ ,��. '. .�,���.� ���"� � ��.�„��� -
� ; �- • / ...� , � _:�_� .�"�`'-:
'. Y � � �• s -.., - �._
I I - `�' �..,�.
` /�1,`
�
� ��� �
� �
—�. � Y I
� I
� �� � � � �_ - ,,� a
_ 2<g ;� +,- ` ���- ' A�•
' _ � 1
� —i � �a� �`14 �� '�7�,.
. �1� �'�� : �� � '
� �` le.!i'1�. � i.� ti- ,� ���
. � .r � \� - '� ��. . - �vN
'� .��• . Get �. ' �S ' -�
— ;
a
��� � '" ���I'�..
�` 4 � � _ �si
., . �e
r . �', , :!�" . '
_ �- - _
i�
'.
�;.
u� �
�i :.4:.,�'�
.,�
.
_ �� � � .
' ` � �,��
I r �i� •��� � , �!
_ � , �l
_ �� ��� '' � ���
� ��, �
r�•*,, , ��—,� ' ''o s' ��:, I �,,
!� / 6 ��� '�,�►�•� ��+ �,.�
- r �. � ���` ' j`• �; '� "�? �'�� ..._ � ��.
� I� .�� ".� � fi -
' -r� �. � �r ' ' ./- .. � ,
-- �` r+..: ✓,�� � _ ! � L �� .
i � II, t.
i � y �yr„�
.�'�' ��'�_ ` _ - �M1�-�"����r»���..��
. _ . ��__ '� .
�. �` � �, �
'�--� . ��-�-
I . � '�
� .
� �;�` i :� ���' ,
��' �!�
r�. � t� �
�-!-`� r 4+.
� � �� �..� ," ,� s '" 4: �'n' �i �
� T� '�
-•,- ,� �;� �� �'?w ` ��
� , � .�. ��r
' �. t■ I • � .y`: , �. � .
�� � � . � �.'� .
/
_� �� �i :��; � , - . -� �: � :.�� ��
� , •�M � , } � �` ` �
� � �. � � ` K4 . .
_ �_-- -,.;.y;,
�
.. � � .,►
N��
��� . .M,�._.
� . _.. ��/,§� .;.+.F� �..r.'ytM{ .. � ���' ..�.�'
+� ,..
�.: . T►� � ,,,.�' _ " . ';'� . I�� ,�,,;; - .
�t�-"`ti �,y � � vrT�s�'� � �� 'I�,�`° , L_
V
+ = _ � �,�"��;�. _ -... �r►
II �/� '' 4 '.
, , , '�
�
/
�r
� � •
��_. - -�— -� - •a � �
ti �
j .
*�x
a�ti�'�' ' `a� f<;+'
��
�I
:'.
- - � i. _`-`- ���- �^. -�
;.
f
. �. -,
-� � � , , -�,:
'�"�;'F.. ='�- � _`�
_ , ,
- �,. - � f_.
.
� ,,�.�.;. �--_ �...._ _� .� .,.r-_
yi _���''` - -- _ `�`�`,� "'. ¢�
,,�+c _,,,, ..�;,. .,.,• .�.
,; � rr �: �,��;. , - .». .. _ - • ,� ',.._ .
' r��-� � � ' �-• �- - �r�,''�-_
� „ . - .-� ;�.. —.s at�:
,_W.. — �t.. a,�� ♦ ..�
� • • � ' ' `` /�'' .•..
.� �� � � r� ~ � � ` �' _
�� t��� -- . �4_ ;,,�_
_ � ,.,
°.�'.1 3' . ".`}":... u.y u�.'.
�
3'�
�
� fn
� ` � `�\
_ :\.
��^
� I � �
w •'
�,�'��. ,�� '"J��� .. �'�
:Y.,' �, ��; �:i-��..�
,�:
_ _��-�.�.,, - - ��� . t.
�bft-S
- a,�"� �; ;{ - � ������-.
- . ,' �,j � : � �y � • ; � . -'�
_ ,.'`�/� '_:.�1 �k �� `•, , '�,J.�'� •-::�.
_ -- ►L `L'�/..U�l� � � M �,.�•�.
� ��1 K�. _