HomeMy WebLinkAboutBridge Street Lodge Redevelopment 1995 (4 of 4) • • �� 1 � �
,•�n>>/
'� L/
, �� CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT
X RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT
WHEREAS, Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association, (the "Owner") is the owner of certain
-. property described as: Condominium Unit 201, Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map
recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 684 at Page 840 as Reception No. 580845 and as defined and
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded December 29,
' � 1995 in Book 684 at Page 839 as Reception No. 580844, Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations and
,` A Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, County of Eagle, State
; of Colorado, (the"Property"); and
o WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the
�°. benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association(the"Condominium Association")and
a� the Town of Vail, Colorado (the"Town").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the following
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
N
�
o� 1. The Property, containing approximately 1,546 square feet, shall be included in the short-term
�, rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates
� at all times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests. �
r+ a� Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or ter�ant dwelling in the
�°� Property. �'
a a� ���
�-,
�� 2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shalt subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate ;..•
o � by the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily w.
�� rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be
-�+ a residential common assessment of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's
�' failure to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the
� � restriction by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the
co o restriction,the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the
�� event litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the
o� prevailing party, the court shall award such party its court costs together with reasonable
� attomey's fees incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's
�,W rental restriction and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the.Condominium
M Association and/or the Town on the Property,which lien shall be evidenced by written notice
� placed of record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, and
�' which may be collected by foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium
N � Association or the Town in like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property.
a� a� -
`,°� 3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two
�� copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting
forth evidence establishing that the Property has been physically occupied or avaitable for
Q,h rental throughout the year, the rental rate,and number of days the Property has been rented.
� The report shall be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
M Q3
00 �
00� 4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
Declaration and may be enforced by the Owner, the Condominium Association or the Town.
5. Use of the Property as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant.
� �
" 6: . The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be
..�. waived, abandoned,terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
. , of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
� �TOWN OF VAIL,-a Colorado municipal corporation
�
gy: ����I �
- G^
RoW. McLaurin, Town Manager
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /��'day af�P��1996 by Robert W. McLaurin
in his capacity as Town Manager of the Town of Vail.
Mne E.lNright,Notary Public
My Commission Expires Cr17-1999
� � �� My Commission expires: 75 S.Frontage Road
Not�ry Public /
� PRUPERTY OWNER: BRIDGE STREET LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
��
,-� - �
By: 3 I ��_� ir% !C�,�� -
�Rosslyn alentine, P sident
R. H. Riley, ecretary �
STATE OF COLORADO ) �`�
) ss. �
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) %�
�
C' �" a-
The fcregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9�� day o��; 1996 by Rosslyn Valentine
in her ca�acity as stated above.
/�'
� Mne E.Wright,Notary Pubfic
My Commission Expires G17-1999
�-'- � My Commission expires: 75 S.Fror►tage Road
Notary° ublic �
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
- COUNTY OF EAGLE )
CzP ,�
The roregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ��`` day of.MarcF, 1996 by R. H. Riley in his
ca�a�ity as stated above.
�� Mne E.Wri�ht,Notary Public
' „�� My Commission Expi�es Cr17-1999
' L �-;- � MyCommissionexpires: 75 S.Frontz�^ �
tvotary Public �
F:ISridgestRRC
588369 B-692 P-372 04/16/96 11 :09A PG 2 OF 2
• � �//I -�
,
�
�j� , CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT
�.i RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT
r�:"
WHEREAS, Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association, (the "Owner") is the owner of certain
property described as: Condominium Unit 204, Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map
� recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 684 at Page 840 as Reception No. 580845 and as defined and
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded December 29,
1995 in Book 684 at Page 839 as Reception No. 580844, Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations and
Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, County of Eagle, State
Aof Colorado, (the"Property"); and �
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the
o benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association(the"Condominium Association")and
� °, the Town of Vail, Colorado(the"Town").
w �
a � NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the following
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
�� � 1. The Property, containing approximately 322 square feet, shall be included in the short-term
o � rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates
N at all times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests.
� Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or tenant dwelling in the
r+ a Property.
c7
a °� 2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shall subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate
¢ � by the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily
r; � rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be
•• r'' a residential common assessment of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's
� v failure to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the
� ��.,' restriction by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the
� � restriction, the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the
co o event litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the �
� v prevailing party, the court shall award such party its court costs together with reasonable �,
�' � attomey's fees incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's �
� � rental restriction and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the Condominium :`
Association and/or the Town on the Pro e y '`�
r� w p rty,which lien shall be evidenced b written notice •.�
M placed of record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado; and �---
� which may be collected by foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium
a' Association or the Town in like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property.
rn a�i 3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two
CO � copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting
� ��' forth evidence establishing that the Property has been physically occupied or available for
w
rental throughout the year, the rental rate,and number of days the Property has been rented.
o r.; The report shall be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
�
o � 4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
00, � Declaration and may be enforced by the Owner, the Condominium Association or the Town.
5. Use of the Property as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant.
588370 �i92 P-373 04/16/96 11 : 1'�PG 2 �F 2
6, The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be
waived, abandoned,terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
? .'_ . of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
�:�TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
: � '�: � 1
B ��,� ` -
Y•
Roberf,�,N. McLaurin, Town Manager
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss. '
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) - ,
r,'h �'�' - -
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this�_day o�, 1996 by Robert W.McLaunn -
in his capacity as Town Manager of the Town of Vail.
, Mne E.Wright,Notary Public
�� � My Commission Expires fr17-1999
i�S.Fron:z�°`:c3d�,..�.,.-� _�
My Commission expires:
Nota Public �
%, _
PROPERTY O�JER: BRIDGE STREET LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
��%j ;!;'���� �''�;
By:_�', �%%�-�,%i�'��1��',�
Rosslyy�Valentine, P sident
r\
1
R. H. Riley, Secretary
�
STATE OF COLORADO ) L
) ss: �,
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) ,�
y G.�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �''��day a€-N4��1996 by Rosslyn Valentine .__
' in hercapacity as stated above.
Mne E.lNright,Notary PubRc
� � My Commission Expires fr17-1999
My Commission expires: ��t.Fror�taae Road
Nctary f�ub�ic
� �TATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
� � <ip,-,l
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � ` day of AAar�tr, 1996 by R. H. Riley in his
capacity as stated above.
Mne E.Wright,Notary Public
�% - My Commission Expires 617-1999
` ,�--� My Commission expires: 75 S.Frartage Road
N ary Public =%'=)
/
e;�er�ages�.RRc
i � � �/ I�
; --'
,) .
�
, ��f CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT
� RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT
WHEREAS, Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association, (the "Owner") is the owner of certain
� property described as: Condominium Unit 301, Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map
recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 684 at Page 840 as Reception No. 580845 and as defined and
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded December 29,
v 1995 in Book 684 at Page 839 as Reception No. 580844, Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations and
A Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, Counry of Eagle, State
of Colorado, (the"Property"); and
o WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the
U °, benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association(the"Condominium Association")and
� � the Town of Vail, Colorado(the"Town").
' NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the fotlowing
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
N
O � 1. The Property, containing approximately 768 square feet, shall be included in the short-term
�, rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates
� at all times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests.
r+ � Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or tenant dwelling in the
� a Property.
a a�
M � 2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shall subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate
r, � by the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily
� U rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be
--� a residential common assessment of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's
�' failure to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the
� � restriction by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the
cc o restriction,the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the
� � event litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the
o � prevailing party, the court shall award such party its court costs together with reasonable � ''
� attomey's fees incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's �
� W rental restriction and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the Condominium
M Association and/or the Town on the Property, which lien shall be evidenced by written notice �
� placed of record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, and ;;.
a which may be collected by foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium ..__
N � Association or the Town in like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property.
o� a� -
C° � 3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two
� � copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting
forth evidence establishing that the Property has been physically occupied or available for
,.., �; rental throughout the year,the rental rate, and number of days the Property has been rented.
� The report shatl be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
M Qj
� N
00 � 4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
Declaration and may be enforced by the Owner, the Condominium Association or the Town.
5. Use of the Property as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant.
r+'' � a,
00
�
w
�
�
6. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be
waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
of Vail and the Owner of the Property. �
_ ° a�
�TOWN OF VAI�, a Colorado municipal corporation iv°
- , i
�/ ro
,� �
BY: � w
Ro ert W. McLaurin, Town anager ,;
STATE OF COLORADO ) o
) ss. 'A
�
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) �
rn
�
co
�
The foregoing instrument was acknowtedged before me this��'day of March, 1996 by Robert W. McLaurin �
in his capacity as Town Manager of the Town of Vail. �.
, r�
�� � ��... MY ommis��,Notary Pubfic �
C MyCommissionexpires: �aires 6. _ �
No ary ?ublic j ' 8e ,oad �
.. ,
PROPERTY OWNER: BRIDGE STREET LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION �'
�� � / i � �� �� O
�/ - �� �
By:, ��-, -.��� �-. �� _
' Rosslyn Valentine, Pr sident �'
1�" �
R. H. Riley, Secretary �
STATE OF COLORADO `/ )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) (�
C,� �
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �l�'day of A�e� 1996 by Rosslyn Valentine �
`in her capacity as stated above. •r
Mne E.lNrigfrt,Notary Public "''
'� My Commission Expires 617-1999 •---
� Yn-`- �� �` MyCommissionexpires: �5 S.Frontage Road
�:otar P�blic
�TAT�OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
�,����%
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -�`��day of Mar�h, 1996 by R. H. Riley in his
capacity as stated above.
,�--, Mne E.W�'�8��NOes 6-17-1999
,' ; Ny Commission ExP�r
75 S.Fror�ta8e Road
����� ��=�— My Commission expires:
� Notsry�Pu�lic /
F:\Bridgest.rZkC
� � �
~ � �� CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT
r�,:
'-,- RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT
WHEREAS, Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association, (the "Owner") is the owner of certain
property described as: Condominium Unit 304, Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map
-- recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 684 at Page 840 as Reception No. 580845 and as defined and
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded December 29,
1995 in Book 684 at Page 839 as Reception No. 580844, Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations and
Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, County of Eagle, State
A of Colorado, (the"Property"); and . �
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the
o benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association(the"Condominium Association")and
v °. the Town of Vail, Colorado(the"Town").
w �
a �
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the following
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
�" � 1. The Property, containing approximately 367 square feet, shall be included in the short-term
o ,� rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates
c, at atl times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests.
�°, Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or tenant dwelling in the
� � Property.
�
a
a °� 2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shall subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate
M � b the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily �
Y �
.-� � rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be �,
r, � a residential common assessment of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's ��
� �, failure to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the �
ca +� restriction by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the
� � restriction, the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the
� � event litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the
� prevailing party, the court shall award such party its court costs together with reasonable
o � attomey's fees incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's
� rental restriction and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the Condominium
�n w Association and/or the Town on the Property,which lien shall be evidenced by written notice
; placed of record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, and
� which may be collected by foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium
a Association or the Town in like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property.
N �+ -
� � 3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two
`� �u, copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting
� �, forth evidence establishing that the Property has been physically occupied or available for
. rental throughout the year,the rental rate,and number of days the Property has been rented.
c" �-, The report shall be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
�
M �
� �+ 4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
00 � Declaration and may be enforced by the Owner, the Condominium Association or the Town.
5. Use of the Property as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant.
�
\I�I+�' � .
�
00
, 00
• -' W
v
�6. �" The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be �"
� waived, abandoned, terrninated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
of Vail and the Owner of the Property. �
i
T�WN OF��AI�, a Colorado municipal corporation �
N
�
By�_ /`L. 7 �2 l�� `�
Robert W..McLaunn, Town Manager �
�
STATE OF COLORADO ) .
) ss. �
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) �
r
�
\
1��;� ca
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ��day of.DdsFefr, 1996 by Robert W. McLaurin �
. in#�is capacity as Town Manager of the Town of Vail. ,.r
r
, . /% . Mne E.lNright,Notary Public �.-�
, ' y �--- My Commission expires: �Commission Expires 617-1999 �
,Notar}r �lib c ro
�
- RR�f?ERTY OWNER: BRIDGE STREET LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION �,
� � � -'� ,� ���
By: �
�i!�%���:=!Cl.-,'- � �� 'O
Rosslyri alentine, Pr sident N
� •,
;
,
• R. H. Riley, Secretary
�
STATE OF COLORADO '-�
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) (�9
�,p,.l G.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this `��h day of-MaFch, 1996 by Rosslyn Valentine �
in her capaGity as stated above. �
, �
�` Mne E.WriRht,Notary PubGc
%� My Commission Expires Cr17-1999 `
� �� �—� My Commission expires: 75 S.Fror�age P,oad
Notary/Publi�
- �
STATE �f GOLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
�' ,.,�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -�"� day o�M�Fi, 1996 by R. H. Riley in his
capacity as stated above.
�` Notary P�bGc
Mne E.Wright,
"��'� /f� My Commission expires: MY Co�5 S ro��a8e Road-1�
Notary P. blic
F:\Bridgest.RRC
� ' - � � �i •r -� , .�.
' • ?fr �.t.:? . , : ,
. . � �! �� �
�
� - v� cn
' ��° ��' CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT ,�'y �
RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT � W
�
� w
WHEREAS, Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association, (the "Owner") is the owner of certain �
property described as: Condominium Unit 310, Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map ��
recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 684 at Page 840 as Reception No. 580845 and as defined and � �
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded December 29, c��
1995 in Book 684 at Page 839 as Reception No. 580844, Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations and `� "'
Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, County of Eagle, State
of Colorado, (the"Property"); and 'ti
w
WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the t� o
benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association(the"Condominium Association")and �
the Town of Vail, Cotorado(the"Town"). �o
c� �
�
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the o �
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the following � �
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the �+ rn
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns. `� ,..,
n�
f..�..
1. The Property, containing approximately 220 square feet, shall be included in the short-term � �
rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates �y
at all times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests. R„ ,�
Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or tenant dwelling in the � �
Property.
m �
�
2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shall subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate �o
by the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily � �
rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be � N
a residential common assessment of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's
failure to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the
restriction by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the
restriction, the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the
event litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the
prevailing party, the court shall award such party its court costs together with reasonable � �
attomey's fees incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's • c�
rental restriction and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the Condominium o°
Association and/or the Town on the Property,which lien shall be evidenced by written notice
placed of record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, and
which may be collected by foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium p
Association or the Town in like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property. n
3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two
copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting ...,,
forth evidence establishing that the Property has been physically occupied or available for
rental throughout the year,the rental rate, and number of days the Property has been rented.
The report shall be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
Declaration and may be enforced by the Owner, the Condominium Association or the Town. Q?
�.
5. Use of the Properry as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be ,�.-�,,,,
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant. �
,�
588373 �692 P-376 04/16/96 11 : 1� PG 2 OF 2
�_ 6. , The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be
. waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
°• of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
'TOWN OF VA,1L, a Colorado municipal corporation
% �--
By: � � �� �
Robert W. cLaurin, Town Manager
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
, ,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /f day a�J��erEFi, 1996 by Robert W. McLaurin
in his capacity as Town Manager of the Town of Vail.
�� // ��� Mne E.WriB�rt,Notary Public
y MyCommissionexpiresMY Commission Expires f,17-1999
Notary PubGc i • ro ge oa
PROPER i Y_QWNER: BRIDGE STREET LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
��;/��: �
B�l:�r / � • �
% -/���i�L/:��,;
•�y Valentine, President
J , �
R. H. Riley, Secretary
STATE OF COLORADO ' )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
` „ :��
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '��day ofllQafeh;1996 by Rosslyn Valentine
� in her capacity as stated above.
Anne E.lNriRht,Notary Public
/ -t- � My Commission expires: MY Commission F.xp;res 617-1999
Nota P�bli�� ' • ad
- ( O
STi0.TE OF COLORADO ) �
�
) ss. ::
CGUNTY OF EAGLE ) �_
�' ., /
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this3`�`� day �rch, 1996 by R. H. Riley in his
capacity as stated above.
,�± Mne E.N/right,Notary Public
_ �"�� f%i� My Commission Expires Cr17-1999
t-� ` My Commission expires: 75 S.Frontage Road
Nbtary Public f
F:18^dgest.RRC
. � � � � ���: ..
� CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT
� ��� RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT
�L
WHEREAS, Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association, (the "Owner") is the owner of certain
property described as: Condominium Unit 401, Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map
recorded December 29, 1995 in Book 684 at Page 840 as Reception No. 580845 and as defined and
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded December 29,
.-. 1995 in Book 684 at Page 839 as Reception No. 580844, Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations and
Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, County of Eagle, State
of Colorado, (the"Property"); and
� WHEREAS, the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the
O
A benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association(the"Condominium Association")and
the Town of Vail, Colorado(the"Town").
0
� °, NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the
a � benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the following
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
, 1. The Property, containing approximately 1,510 square feet, shall be included in the short-term
� rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates
% N � at all times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests.
o � Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or tenant dwelling in the
�, Property.
0
.-, � 2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shall subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate
� a by the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily
a °� rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be
� � a residential common assessment of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's
r., �, failure to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the
•• �'' restriction by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the
� � restriction, the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the
� ,,�,' event litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the
� � prevailing party, the court shall award such party its court costs together with reasonable
cc o attomey's fees incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's
�t-' rental restriction and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the Condominium -
o � Association and/or the Town on the Property,which lien shall be evidenced by written notice
� placed of record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, and �
� W which may be collected by foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium r.-;
M Association or the Town in like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property. �,•
� - r�
a r.
3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two rr"„
�� � copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting �.._
� � forth evidence estabtishing that the Property has been physically occupied or available for
, � rental throughout the year,the rental rate, and number of days the Property has been rented.
� •�' The report shall be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
w
d, �; 4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
� Declaration and may be enforced by the Owner, the Condominium Association or the Town.
r� ad
� ti
00, � 5. Use of the Property as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant.
- � �
� cn
00
o�
6. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be �
, waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
• of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
- u�
�TOWN OF<V�IL, a Colorado municipal corporation Q,
� _ ca
-lL��-� _ �"
By: �� ,�
Ro ert W. McLaurin, Town Manager �
. w
�
STATE OF COLORADO ) �
)ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) ,°�,
� .. �
�
rn
�
_ The foregoing instrumentwas acknowledged before me this /�'��day of c , 1996 by Robert W. McLaurin �
. in his capacitv as Town Manager of the Town of Vail. °'
' r
, Mne E.tNright,Notary Pub�ic F-'
._ �� ..
�,� � My Commission Expires 617-1999
My Commissionexpires:_ 75 S.Frorrtage Road ,�
Notary Public a
b
PROPERTY OWNER: BRIDGE STREET LODGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION �
� -���� N
�/ / / / �� �
� � ���i� ��
By: ./ �'�i�l-_'l=',� �'���i"
Rosslyn Valentine, P esident �
/�' N
} �
R. H. Riley, Secretary
STATE OF COLORADO �)
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '�1�'�day of.M�erch'1996 by Rosslyn Valentine
in her capacity as stated above.
Mne E.Wright,NotarY Public
�� My Commission F.xpires 617-1999
� — - � J`�" MyCommissionexpires: 75 S.FrordaBe Road
N ary F'ubiic
STA�E'�OF COLORADO )
)ss. �
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) .
CZr'�,� � �
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '`� day nf�lllaFeh; 1996 by R. H. Riley in his �
capacity as stated above.
�, ._..._
J" ,_;'- � Anne E.Wright,Notary Public
�� �`'�' MyCommissionexpires: MyCommissionF.�ires617-1999
�No F.ubtic
'F:\BrPJgest.r7RC
� '�.ted by Mike Mollica 3/12/9 5:30pm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P
From: Mike Mollica Confirm recei t
To: Anne Wright
Subject: Bridge Street Lodge
===URGENT=NOTE_________________________
The floor area calculations of the
units was not correct as listed. Here
are the accurate measurements:
#201 =1, 546 sq. ft_
#204 = 322 sq. ft.
#301 = 768 sq. ft.
#304 = 367 sq. ft.
#310 = 220 sq. ft_
#401 =1, 510 sq. ft.
Page: 1
�
� � �
. � � ,�,�:���
. ��c � a I ✓
-k-t.� _
iSa3 s �'�- �
5�6 �
��
� �
. � D � �
� � /' ( �2�. �
q � �
�
-�
-> _ �
� �_� � � �
� �
�� � 7 76g
�
��
� � ��( � � i.� S ��--
�
�
��� �
� �
� I C� �/ � �-v o
�z � � , _
� -�°�
. �( � ( ✓ r �
r � �
�����
r � �
f
�i
�y
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road Off ce of the Town Attorney
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2107/Fax 970-479-2157
; ��l�� r-��p'{4
� � �-rt-� � �
� ;� � .� � �
November 9, 1995 f �� . - � � �`�,� F
� �, `y' �>
���,� N 0 V 1 0 1995 �''�
�:� �, ,� � i���I� ���,����,
Mr. Clark Willingham ��U - ���11�1��
c/o Snowdon and Hopkins, Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Clark:
Enclosed you will find a Restrictive Rental Covenant which has some additional changes. This is
the form that is acceptable to the Town. I do have a question as to the first sentence on paragraph
2 which I did not change nor understand. It ends "which assessment when paid shall be a residential
common element of the condominiums." I have not seen an assessment described as a common
element previously. Please give this your consideration and advise me as to whether or not you
believe it is appropriate wording.
The only matter that is outstanding at this time is for me to draft the revised easement agreement so
that we can provide for the encroachments below grade on Hansen Ranch Road. I do believe we are
getting close.
Very trul ours,
/�
RlThomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RTM/aw
Attachment
xc: Mike Mollica `,
��•RECYCLED PAPER
r
�
• � �
r
CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE RENTAL COVENANT
WHEREAS, , (the "Owner") is the owner of certain
property described as: Condominium Unit , Bridge Street Lodge according to the Condominium Map
recorded in Book at Page as Reception No. and as defined and
described in the Condominium Declaration for Bridge Street Lodge Condominiums recorded
in Book_at Page as Reception No. , Subject to the Terms, Conditions, Obligations
and Restrictions as contained in said Condominium Declaration and Supplements thereto, County of Eagle,
State of Colorado, (the"Property"); and
WHEREAS,the Owner wishes to place certain restrictions as to the rental use of the Property for the
benefit of the Owner,the Bridge Street Lodge Condominium Association (the"Condominium Association")and
the Town of Vail, Colorado (the"Town").
NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, establish, acknowledge, and declare for the
benefit of all persons who may hereinafter purchase, lease, rent, or hold the subject Property, the following
restrictions, covenants, and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the Property and inure to the
benefit and be binding upon the Owner, the respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
1. The Properry, containing approximately square feet, shall be included in the short-term
rental program of the Bridge Street Lodge. Such rentals shall be at comparable market rates
at all times when the Property is not physically occupied by the Owner or Owner's guests.
Physically occupied means actual possession with the Owner or tenant dwelling in the
Property.
2. A violation of the Owner's rental restriction shall subject the Owner to a daily assessment rate
by the Condominium Association of three times a rate considered to be a reasonable daily
rental rate for the Property at the time of the violation,which assessment when paid shall be
a residential common element of the condominiums. The Condominium Association's failure
to enforce the Owner's rental restriction shall give the Town the right to enforce the restriction
by the assessment and the lien provided for hereunder. If the Town enforces the restriction, _
the Town shall receive the funds collected as a result of such enforcement. In the event
litigation results from the enforcement of the restriction, as part of its reward to the prevailing
parry,the court shalt award such party its court costs together with reasonable attorney's fees
incurred. All sums assessed against the Owner for violation of the Owner's rental restriction
and unpaid shall constitute a lien for the benefit of the Condominium Association and/or the
Town on the Property,which lien shall be evidenced by written notice placed of record in the
Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, and which may be collected by
foreclosure, on Owner's condominium unit by the Condominium Association or the Town in
like manner as a mortgage or deed of trust on real property.
3. No later than February 1 of each year, the Owner of the subject Property shall submit two
copies of a report to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail setting
forth evidence establishing that the Property has been physically occupied or available for
rental throughout the year,the rental rate, and number of days the Property has been rented.
The report shall be attested to by the Property Manager of the Condominium Association.
1
� � •
�
�
4. The provisions of these restrictive covenants shall be recorded in the Condominium
Dec�aration and may be enforced by the Owner,the Condominium Association or the Town.
5. Use of the Property as an Employee Housing Unit as defined by the Town shall not be
considered a violation of this restrictive rental covenant.
6. The conditions, restrictions, stipulations, and agreements contained herein shall not be
waived,abandoned,terminated, or amended except by the written consent of both the Town
of Vail and the Owner of the Property.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
By:
Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1995.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
PROPERTY OWNER:
By:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1995.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
� F:\BridgesLRRC
2
_�,. ., _ , -- - - - �- - . -• _ Y - - � - - - - - - • - -
• �r,,`� �
. � � _ ��� ��
�
, � � � R�9J� � a
� �,�,� N 0 � �.
�� ; ��=� • � ��t��-� .
' ��eita A����tJLe�4t�munity D� �"fi
Department �
• �
APPLICATI�N FOR ";tJ V � � ��,_ =;�;;
C4NDOMINIUMITOWNHOU3E PLAT REVIEW �"
(Ch�pter 17.F2 V�ii Municipal Code) ����, � . �"�-j
� (ple,ase print or type) � '�
,`
;
A. APPLICANT ��-1�'�E �T��'( �0'DG�
� MAILINQ ADDRES8 Z7$ �Awl So� �►�GH �D�D IIA1�. �.
PHONE ��4` � �
B. APPLICANTS REPRESENTATtV� I��� T(L(� , ,__,,.
ADDRESS_ZZS ���DGfvS��'2�Oi' PHONE �� � ''Q ��0
C. PROPERTY OWNER ��� ��� �n�� ��Oµ�"��ui''� �"51�c1AT;on.l
OWNER'S 81GiNATURE , � PH4NE �7�� 4�� (
MAILING AODRESS Z-'7$ �'�+�svy �4�G�,�4� U��L
p, �OCATION OF PROPOSAL:
�? �- �1 �
STREET ADDR�SS �S � SO� �IMs�C� �LO��
��.
LOT� � BI.00K�„�SUBDIVISIdN �►1#� IFICt�-R�� FILI a /
� c � � � � � �2l ��
E. APPUCATlON �EE $100�.00 PAID �� �� '� cHEcK �r� DATE___�,�_„_„�
��,
,"� ��
F. MATERiA�.S "�O BE SUBMITTED: � L��`
1. Two mylar coples and one paper copy of the subdivision plat shail be 8ubmitted
to the Department of Community Development, The plat shall include a sfte
map with the following requiraments:
a. The final plat �hall be drawn by a reqlatered surveyor In India ink, or
other aubstantlal solution, on a reproducible medium (preferably mylar)
with dimension oi twenty-four by thirty-six inches and shall be at a scale
ot one hundred feet to ane inch or lar�er with margins of one and one-
half to twp Inches on tMe left and one-hafi inch on all other sides.
b. Accu►ate dimensions to the nearast one-hundredth of a foot for all lines,
angles and curv�s used to descrlbe boundarfes, streets, setbacks,
alleys, easements, structures, areas to be reseNed or dedicated for
publlc or common uses and other important features. Ali curvas shall be
aircu►ar �res and shall be defined by the radlus, central an�fe, arc �
scored diatances and bea�ing. All dimensions, both linear and angular,
are to be dete�mined by an accurate control survey in the fleld which
must balanae and close wlthin a Iimft of one in ten thousand.
o. North arrow and graphlo acals.
d. A systematic identificatlon of ail exiating and proposed bui{dings, units,
lots� blocka, and namas for all streeis.
�..urC �` �--',.,�— "`'�1°�`_ �'�.-.Q.�.' .
,
��x� ��9- q�� 9
_r _ y _ ._ ' _ _ � . ..• �
� e. An identificaUon ot the �treets, alley&, parks��a�tlhvreotpo�he pub�or
facilities as shawn bn the plat, and a dedicat o
use, An Identiflcation of the easem�nts as shown on the plat and a
grant thereaf to the publlc use. Areas reser+�ed tor future publlc
acqufsition shaA aiso be shown an the �lat .
f, A written survey description of the area includinQ the total acrea�e to the
nearest appropriste slqniticant flgure. The acreage af each fat or parcel
sha{f be shown in thls manner as well.
�, A descriptian ot all $uroey manument�, both found and set� whlch mark
the boundaries ot the subdivision� and a desariptlpn af ali monuments
used in�conductin$ the aurvey. Monument perimeter per Colorado
statutes. Twa pe�imeter monuments sh�l be establlshed as maJor
control monuments, the materfats wh►ch shall be deterrnined by the town
en�inaer.
h. A statement by the land surveYor expialning how bearing base was
� determined.
i. A certiNcate by the regist�red land surveyor as outlined in Chapter 17.32
of this title as to the accuracy of the survey and plat, and that the suroey
w�s performed by him In accorda�ce with Catorado Revised Statutes
1973, Title 38, Artiole 51. '
), A certiticate by en attornsy admltted to practice in the State ot Golorado,
or corporat� titte Insurer, that the owner(s) of record dedicating to the
pubtic the public rlght•of-way, areas or faciklties as shown theraon are
the owners thereot In fee simpie� free snd Clear of all liens and
encumbrances except as notsd.
, k. The proper form for filin� of the plat with t�e Eagle County Clerk and
Recorder.
I, � Certificate of dedicat�an and awnership. Should the ceRifiCate of
dedicatlon and ownershlp provlde tor a dedicatlon of iand or
Improvemonts to the public, all banefipiaries of deeds of trust and
mortga�e holders on said real prope�y wi{I ba requirep to sign the
ceRificate of dedicatian and ownersh p In �ddition to the fee ssmpla
owner thereof. �'
m, A11 ourrent taxes must be paid prior to the Town's approval ot plat. Thls
includes taxes which have baen tsillqd but are not yet dus. 7ha
certificate ot taxes paid must be signed on the plat or a statement from
the Eagle County A�sessor's Office muat be provided with the submittal
infdrmat+on st�ting that all taxes have been pald.
n, Signature of owner.
2. Ths cor�laminfum or townhous� plat shall �Iso include floor plans, elevatlons
Bt1� 4fRB$•8eGtlQns 8�� �t��9&S�ry tQ �CCUrak�ly determfne Indiv�d�al alr spacea
$nd/or other ownershlps and if the project was bullt subst�ntlally the s�me as
tha approved plans. '
� 3. A copy af the candamintum eocuments for s�atf revlew to assure that there are
maintenance provisions included fvr all commonly owned areas.
Q. APpROVAL PROGESS, REVIEW CRlTERIA
Upon roceiv{nq two copies of a complete submittal alonfl with payment of the
appropriate fee, the zoning administrator shall raute one copy of the slte map to the
town engineer far his review. The zoning adminlstrator shail then conduct thls r�vlew
concurrently. The taw� englr►eer sha11 revlew the submittal and return comments and
2
_ '!�' ' _' � '._ _. _ ' '. _. - ` . . . _ _ ' _ ..
. , • � �
1
� notific�tions to the zonin� administratar who shall transmit the approval, disapprov�l or
approval with modificatlons of the piat within fourteen days to the s�pplican#. Th�
xoning adminlst�atar shatl sign the plat if gpproved ar require modlficatlons on the plat
for approval or deny approv�l due to inconsist�ncles with dte orig(na11y approved plan
or ta(lure t0 make other required modificatlons of the p4at.
H. FILING ANO REC4RDINOi
The zoninq s�dministratar sh�ll be the flnal signature required on�the plat so that the
Department af Gommunfty bevelopment wlil be responsible for prbmptly recording the
approved plat wlth the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, Fees for recording 8hail be
paid by the �ppii�nt. Tne Community Development Department wlll retain ona mylar
copy of the plat for their records and wlli record th� remafning myl�r copy.
I. If this applicatfon requires a separate revlew by any local, Stete or Federai a�ency
othQr than the Tawn of V�il, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00.
�xamples of such review� may include, bui are not fimited to: Colorado Department of
Highway Access Permits, Army Corps ot Engineers 404, etc.
The epplicant sha!! be responstble for paying any publishing faea which are in exceas
af 54% of the appllcation fee. If, at th� gpplicant's request, any m�tter is postponed far
hearing, causing the matter to be re-publlshed, then the entire fee for such re-
publication shafl be paid by the appiicant.
Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have significant
design, Iand use or other issues which may have a si�nific�nt imp�ct an the
community may requlre revlew by consultants other than town staff. Shoutd a
determinatlon be made by the town staff that an outslde consultant Is needed to revlaw
any etpplication, the Communiry Devsiopment DapaRment may hire an outslde
consultant, (t shaN estimate the amount of maney neoessary to pay h1m or her and thls
amount shait be forwarded to the Tawn by the ap�licant at the time he files hls
application wlth the C�mmunity Developrnent Depa�tment, Upon completion of the
revlew of the appllcatlon by the consultant, any of the funds fcrwgrded by the �ppllcant
for payment of the consultant which h�ve not been pald to the consultant shall be
returned to the applfcant, Expenses fncurred by the Town In excess of the amount
forwardsd by the application shall be pald to the Town by the appllcant wlthln 34 days
of notification py the Town.
' 3
�'
� Pro�eCt No.:
P. O. BOX 97B • Sl//lE' !O1 `-'3 -�� ^ j
. 077 A/f1CI1LF ROAO ����n J420 VANC£S7R£FT �
A►�V GL'CQ B1620 • • LAKEMtJ�GY), GY.YO. 80275 Dsce I66uGd:
(3QJf 9s9-307? ��ne�i�. (,Jp,�)23?-0158
_ '� /u �`�r5
, ;
T0: � � `�-U!'niJ �t� RE: ���..����r_ S �t�c� L��crC
_�o :✓� �'�' V:, ,` I i/v,`/ '%� � .
//� �`�_ ~�ra.�.�:�,� /i��
-- i/�: i . ��� �/G,._5 � i�o�;�/o- /Y)o,/�
WE ARE FORWARDING TO YOU:
� Herewith � Under Separate Cover Via
❑ Estimates ❑ Proposals ❑ Reports
� Prints [] Specifications � Survey
Copy of Le�-ter ❑ Change Order �
N0. COPIES DRAWifJG N0. LAST DATEG DESCRIPTION
'� :� � _ r ^ , �,
1:. � ,�r ,j �r �;,, - /i, .
,�� I�r; 7� t�nr ^ -!'��� /
THESE ARE TRANS�IITTED:
(� For Your Use � For Review and Comment Q As Requested
(� For Approval [] Approved as Submitted �
PLEASE NOTE_�G.,"n i- d!�,,,/►G�5 ��`/► Gr_ LG 5 t �./�� ��;
"' , r�G�r� �S c,��i.�c a e�u c__�, s (�i► ,�7��
— L�; ��� i��/ A�C_�c 5 0 � �e/� l/� o �Z�c.- f�.;�r
, �� 9�0
— ./✓1`� �, � %�x Ca�' - S�;G.1 s
NG L r ��(n.�1 ' ' `� .:,/G�'-r �/! I /✓l�t� ..7`7C� 5
� _ �
CC� �,_; `rn i � ' /� M,�,n, Inter-Monnt:in Ensiaeerlas ui.
/� �
PER ` ��'�/�
� Avon � Lakewood _
�
.
-.-_, _..: ._._._, --_.. _.._ _ __,�
� �
Note 1
Unit 103 will be leased by the Condo Association and will be used as the building
office and residential rental office. Any future use of the space must conform to the
Town of Vail, Commercial Core#1 permitted or conditional uses for first floor commercial
property.
- � � ! � .
� TOWN OF VAIL �cE�r ro.�� /C�' �
�
� -
_ � .y.{ EPART11iE:�T OF 1Lti1L,�TCY DE��I.OP!�fE\T
NA71f� � �L��-� ��� " � --^
f ,C-�-•
' ADDitESS_ , �� DATE�/ �/ / 1 '�
PR03ECT
CHECKS MADE PAYABLE TO TOWN OF V.47L
ACCOIA�T 10. ITEM : 1r'O. TAX COST EA. TOTAL
O1 0�00 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS 55.00 *
_z Ol �00 42415 UNiFORM BUILDING CODE S54.00 *
_' 01 0�00 4241� UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE �39.00 *
_= 01 0�)00 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE 537.00 *
- O1 0�00 42415 IINIFORI�7 FIRE CODE �36.00 *
~ O1 Ot�00 42415 NATIONAL ELECTR]CAL CODE �37.00 *
�'- O1 Of�00 42415 OTF�ER CODE BOOKS *
�� O1 (l�)00 41548 BLUE PRINTS(MYLARS) 57.00 *
' O1 0€300 42412 XEROX COPIES 50.25 *
�'' O1 0�300 42412 STUDIES =
�' Ol C�00 42412 TOVFE�S COMPUTER PROGRAM S5.00 *
O1 0�00 42371 PENALTY FEES i RE-INSPECTIONS
�� O1 0�00 41332 PLAN REVIT_'�'V RE-CHECK FEE �40 PER HR.
�� O1 0�00 42332 OFF HOURS Pv'SPECT]ON FEES --
:; O1 OE?00 414]2 CONTRt1CTORS LICENSES FEES
'_ 01 ��00 41413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE S20.00 -
°= Ol 0�00 41413 ADDITIONAL SIGNAG� FEE [S1.00 PER SQ.FT.] �
,: O1 OQ)00 42440 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION -
' O1 Om00 4li31 PRE PAID DL-SIGN W:VIEW BOARD FEE
= O1 0�00 4�371 I1�iVESTIGATION FFE (BUILDING)
31 OC100 4�l 10 TOV PAR}Cliv'G FUND
= O1 0�00 22027 TOV NE�'�'SPAPER DISPENSER FUND
�"' * 01 0000 21112 TAXABLE (a: �% (STATE) Y.
"� * Ol f1000 41010 TAJiABLE a�4% (TO��'\)
-� O1 04}004�371 iBUILDING II�T\'LSTIGATION
OTIIER
-- ;�,
-- PEC APPLICATION E
, O1 0000 41330 ADDITIONAL GRFA "2�0° 5200.00
O1 Ot}00 41330 CONDITIONAL US�PERMIT S200.00
� 01 0000 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION LESS T1�1N 100 SQ.FT. S200.00 �a
-� O1 Oft00 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION [MORE TI�AN 100 SQ.FT.) 5500.00
" 01 OOUO 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT [NEW] �1,�00.00 -
= O1 OEB00 41330 SPECIAL DEVFLOPMENT D1STRICT MAJOR AMEND S 1,000.00 �--
� O1 Q(}00 41330 SPECIAL DEVE PMLNT DISTRICT MINOR �1MEND] S200.00 -
° Ol OQt"� 133 UBDIVISION ' � �,�,-J' �i�,f� ,, f- �� � !-c C =
�- O1 U(1O 4T3 0 VARIANCE S �0.00 -
� O1 Oa00 41330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS 5250.00
� O1 0000 41330 RE-ZONING �200.00
OTHER
OTHER
TOTAL:
��COMMENTiS:
:�
-' CA$g I 1 CK.a f � � �ri.0�1 REC.BY:
� t •
�
To: Bridge Street Lodge (aka Golden Peak House) Planning File
From: Mike Mollic
Date: December 21, 95
Re: Club Sales Office - The eastern portion of Condo Unit 112
Although this commercial space is directly accessable from Sridge Street, and is at the same
general elevation, this area of the building has been categorized as "Basement" space by staff,
according to the CCI horizontal zoning standards. The space does not have direct frontage on
Bridge Street and is located completely below grade, when viewed from the south elevation of the
structure. Staff has determined that it is therefare allowable to permit"professional office" use in
this space.
Should a future reconfiguration of the internal spaces in this building occur, and this space is
provided a direct frontage on Bridge Street,then it shall be reclassified as"first floor" and
professional office use would not be allowed.
• •
November 21, 1995
Golden Peak House -Major SDD Amendment
Revised parking pay-in-lieu calculations:
Parking�Snaces
1. Combine AU#310 with DU#308 = -0.620
2. Combine AU#307 with DU#303/305 = -0.688
3. Enclose deck of DU#302 = No change
4. Enclose deck of DU#304 = No change
5. Convert 65.9 square feet of common
area to commercial = +0.2197
1.0883 surplus
13.545 - Previously required
- 1.0883 - SDD Amendment
12.4567
x $8,594.40
$107,057.86
f:�everyone�mi�e\gpealcpay.n21
�. � �, � . 9 s
� , �� �
� . � � �
ORDINANCE N0. 14 �N� ��
Series of 1995 �A�e ; �— D
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO.31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; AMENDING AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER
18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; LOCATED AT 278 HANSON RANCH ROAD/LOTS A,
B, AND C, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE 1ST FILING AND A PORTION OF TRACT E, VAIL
VILLAGE 5TH FILING, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS:IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS, the developer, GPH Partners, Ltd. has submitted an application for the major
amendment of Special Development District(SDD) No. 31, for a certain parcel of property within the
Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E,
Vail Village Fifth Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak House Special Development
District; and
WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the SDD is in the best interests of the
community as it meets the municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on September 11, 1995, held a public hearing on the major amendment to the SDD
and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the appropriate
parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to
the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to modify the approved SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. •
R�(aW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORAt�O, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
Ordinance No.14,
1 Ssries of 1995
�I
-�
• • �
�
SECTION 2
Special Development District No. 31 was established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space, employee housing, streetscape improvements and other amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental Commission,
and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be satisfied through the
imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 31 was established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District No.
31 and said 8,375 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 31".
�ECTION 4
The Town Council finds that the amendment to the approved development plan for SDD. No.
� 31 meets each of the standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of uail or demonstrates that either one or.more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solutian
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the
amendment to the development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The amended development plan
is comprised of those plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the
following documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated October 25, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
'
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, 1993 (second floor plan).
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995 and August 14,
1995 (third floor plan).
6. She�t No_ A-1 f1 �iatP�i .lani iarv 19, 1 QQ� anri rcviccrl .li i1y 18, �QCl�� �fa,��('�h f��Cr
plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated October 25, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995 and August
Ordinance No.t4,
2 Series of 1995
� • o
{
14, 1995 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development Disirict.
SECTION 5
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for its
consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these standards
are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of
SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31:
A. Lot Area- The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks-The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved Development
Plans.
C. . Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Building shall be as
indicated on the Approved Development Plans.
D. Density Control-The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not exceed
18,715 square feet. This figure includes 2,781 square feet of excess common area that has been
included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes fourteen (14)
dwelling units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94%of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Pl�ns.
F. Landscaping-All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved Development
�'fans.
G. Parking - As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Stree# Parkino a,nd I_na�linn all nrnnertiac Inratpri wrthin tho r:�►„mor���i r�►o i �p�A �+��+,�,.+�r.�n
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by GPH Partners, Ltd.
paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The 1993 SDD approval required a total of 13.794
parking spaces. This 1995 major SDD amendment requires an additional 0.2197 parking
spaces. Payment into the parking fund,for the major SDD amendment portion of the project,
Ordinance No.14,
3 se�es a,sss
f �
I
� � �
P
shall occur prior the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certfficate of Occupancy for the project,
according to Section 18.52.160(B,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 6
The developer,jointly and severally, agrees with�he following requirements, which are a part
of the Town's approval of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD No.
31, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-bedroom,
employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be a minimum size
of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance requirements and such
units shall be within the Town of Vail.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment project,
the Golden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute $32,000.00 towards the redesign
and redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The$32,000 contribution towards the redevelopment of Seibert
Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a future Special Improvement
District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment project,
Vail Associates, Inc., will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open space shall
be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck" easements.
A portion of the Mill Creek stream tract will be dedicated to the Town of Vail as permanent open
space and the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E will be leased to the Town of Vail for the purpose of
maintaining the park. The terms of the lease are to be agreed upon by the parties.
G. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates, Inc.
shali reserve a public pedestrian access, across Lot C, which is located between the Golden Peak
House and the Hill Building, by declaration to be recorded with the Eagle County Recorder. Such
decf�ration shall be permanent and only revocable upon written agreement with the Town of Vail.
Tre de��a.ration of public pedestrian access shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a Building
Permit for the project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Tem�nrarv CPrtifir,�t� �f����n��,��r#�r thp
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates, at
all times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
Ordinence No.14,
4 Series of 1995
� • .
,
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the two accommodation units (or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association, or their successors in
interest, shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s)
which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements as set
forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail Transportation Master Plan, if and
when an improvement district(s) is formed.
9. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and GPH Partners, Ltd. shall
cooperate with, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any efforts by the Town of Vail to
establish additional view corridors or amendments to existing view corridors as enhanced by the
project. Such changes and additions shall be pursuant to the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
10. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include the
curved retail windows along the eastern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design Review
Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11. That GPH Partners, Ltd. further articulate the first floor"retail windows", by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry on
the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
13. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 7
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be
approved by the.Planninq and Environmental Commission at a ren��larlv cr.hPCi��IPC� n��niir �,par�nn
in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which do
change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by Town Council
after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development Department shall
determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
Ordinance No.14,
5 series or,ses
� 4 �
. .
SECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. The
developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Municipal Code of the Town of
Vail.
�ECTION 9
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and
the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 10
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 11
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other
action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and
raen�cted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any ordinance
�reviously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
Ordinence No.14,
6 Series of 1995
� • •
}
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1995. A public hearing on this
ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
on the day of , 1995, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THIS DAY OF , 1995.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
Ordinance No.14,
7 Series of 1995
�
' • • `�11�^" �.�blX.(..CSh
,;
�
MINUTES � �
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING � �
November 7, 1995
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, November 7, 1995, in
the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order
at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor
Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
Tom Steinberg
Sybill Navas
Jan Strauch
Rodney E. Slifer
Paul Johnston
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Assist Town Manager
Lori Aker, Deputy Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. There was no citizen
participation.
The second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of October 3 and 17, 1995.
B. Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance Amending
Section 9.22.101A. which contains the definition for Larceny.
Mayor OsterFoss read the Consent Agenda in full. Lapin moved to approve the
Consent Agenda with a second by Steinberg. Navas asked that a typo be corrected and
that her vote on item five have an explanation added as to why she was opposed.
Johnston noted on item one that Steinberg's name be inserted instead of his name
where reference was made to previous council members present at the time of t.he land
purchase. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
The third item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1995, first reading of
an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund,
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Parking Structure Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, Police
Confiscation Fund, Facilities Maintenance Fund, Vail Marketing Fund and the Vail
Housing Fund, of the 1995 budget and the financial plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado;
and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein; and setting
forth details in regard thereto. Steve Thompson and Christine Anderson presented the
Third Quarter Financial Report and list of required supplemental appropriations. Staff
is requesting approval of Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1995 on ;irst reading. Lapin
moved to approve Ordinance No. 22 of 1995 on first reading, with a second by
Steinberg. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
The fourth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1995, first reading of
an ordinance amending Chapter 2.48, Compensation of Town Officials, Town of Vail
Municipal Code. Tom Moorhead presented this item to council. Council is asking for a
raise of$200 to $500 per month for Council members and $500 to $1000 per month for
the Mayor. Said change, if approved would start January 1, 1998 with pay adjustments
made every 4 years per the Denver CPI. Hermann Staufer encouraged the council to
vote no on this Ordinance. He challenged next years Council that if they donate their
money to charity, he would match a like amount to the same charity. Money should not
1 v:���.�..�:�cw,:.,n�.�,�n;..,., „���,5
• 0 �
.
;
- ` 4e the reason a Council member serves. The main reason must be they want to make
��,; �
`:��' �;contribution to the community. Slifer noted the last time council received a raise was
1981. Slifer made a motion to increase Council's pay to $1,000 per month and the
Mayor's pay to $1,500 per month, with a second by Paul Johnston. A vote was taken
and failed 2-5. Johnston and Slifer were in favor of the motion and Navas, Strauch,
Steinberg, Osterfoss and Lapin against. Bob Fiske encouraged the Council to vote for
a pay increase as he believes it would encourage and enable more individuals to run
for council. Lapin made a motion to approve Ordinance 23, 1995 on first reading
allowing for a Council pay increase to $500 per month and the Mayor's pay increased
to $1000 per month; said increase and CPI calculations to start January 1, 1998, with a
second by Steinberg. The motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The fifth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1995, second reading
of an annual appropriation ordinance adopting a budget and financial plan and making
appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
for its fiscal year January 1, 1996, through December 31, 1996, and providing for the
levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1995 tax
year and payable in the 1996 fiscal year. Steve Thompson presented this item to
Council. The Council has been reviewing the 1996 budget for several weeks. The
ordinance summarizing the expenditures is required by statute. Staff is recommending
approval of Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1995. Johnston moved to approve Ordinance
No. 20, Series of 1995 on second reading, with a second by Strauch. A vote was taken
and passed unanimously, 7-0.
The sixth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1995, second reading
of an ordinance to change the zoning of 67 properties in the Town of Vail from their
current zoning to the Natural Area Preservation District, Outdoor Recreation District, or
the General Use District. Russ Forrest and Jim Curnutte presented this item to Council.
On August 22, 1994, staff received approval to amend the text of Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District (GNOS) and Chapter 18.36, Pubfic Use
District (PUD), of the Vail Municipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 18.33, Outdoor
Recreation District (OR). These text amendments and the proposed zoning changes,
as identified in Ordinance No. 19, are intended to insure that the uses allowed in these
zone districts are consistent with their purpose statements, and that properties
throughout Town, especially those with open space characteristics, are located in the
appropriate zone district. The Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the
proposed zoning changes on September 24, 1995 and voted 4-2-1 to recommend
approval of these changes. The two dissenting members stated that they wanted
parcel #21 (proposed par 3 site) to be rezoned to the General Use District. Staff also
reviewed issues and public comments concerning the proposed rezoning of the Mt. Bell
site (#34). The PEC felt strongly that the entire Mt. Bell parcel should be rezoned to the
General Use District as per the staff memo. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance
No. 19, Series of 1995. Steinberg wants to change the Red Sandstone site boundary
lines and Johnston wants to change the Mountain bell site boundary lines. Hermann
Staufer encouraged Council to create a zone just for the Vail Golf Course. The Golf
course needs to run as a first class operation and a zone just for a golf course could
assure this. Moorhead stated the Outdoor Recreation zone district allows for golf
courses as a permitted use and provides for the needs of a golf course. Navas is
concerned the new zoning on the recreation parcels may make ;t difficult to place any
comrnunity buildings on these parcels. She thinks Outdoor Recreation is inappropriate
for some parcels and General Use may allow for greater flexibility. Slifer wondered if
this item should be tabled pending resolution of these questions. Moorhead stated it
would be appropriate to table the issue if Council wants to reconsider Outdoor
Recreation vs. General Use, or the questionable parcels could be removed from this
Ordinance and continue with a motion. Lapin made a motion to Approve Ordinance
No. 19, Series of 1995 on second reading, excluding property no. 51 (upper bench of
Donovan Park) and west of Red Sandstone School create a line to allow for NAPD on
the steep section of that parcel, with a second by Steinberg. A vote was taken and
passed, 6-1 with Navas opposing.
2 1/.d�C...�dC.:,.y Yyl..a.y YYJ;,..La 11�7�/5
M , � •
' , .
The seventh on the agenda was Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1995, second reading of
an ordinance amending Section 5.04.120 Transfer of License and Section 5.20.100
Exemptions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Tom Moorhead and Steve
Thompson presented this item to council. 1) Council requested staff to prepare an
ordinance that would allow some relief from the Annual Business License fee when a
new owner occupied an existing space and began a new operation in a space that a
prior owner had paid the annual business license fee. 2) Council requested staff to
prepare amendments to our special events license to guarantee that exempt, non-profit
organizations will significantly benefit from such special events. This direction was
provided as a result of a special event that was perceived to be nothing more than a
retail sales event that did not provide significant benefit to an exempt organization.
Staff is recommending the following: 1) Staff recommends a more equitable approach is
to prorate the annual business license fee for the initial year of operation. 2) Staff
advises that the change may significantly impact special events and sales tax revenue
from those events. Moorhead stated this ordinance provides for a quarterly, prorated
business license, but does not reduce the fee to less than $100 and will take affect
October 2, 1995. �apin moved to approve Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1995 on second
reading, with a second by Steinberg. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
The eighth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1995, second
reading of an ordinance providing for the major amendment of Special Development
District No. 31, Golden Peak House; amending an approved development plan for
Special Development District No. 31, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail
Municipal Code; located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail
Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village 5th Filing, and setting forth details
in regard thereto. Mike Mollica presented this item to Council. On September 11,
1995, the Planning and Environmental Commission voted (by a vote of 4-2, with Armour
and Pratt opposed) to recommend approval for the applicant's requests. The staff
recommendation is for approval of the applicant's request to modify the density section
of the SDD, with regard to the overall number of dwelling units. Additionally, staff �
recommends denial of the applicant's request to modify the density/GRFA portion of the
proposal. Please see the attached staff memorandum, dated September 11, 1995, to
the Planning and Environmental Commission. Steinberg moved to approve Ordinance
No. 14, Series of 1995 on second reading, with a second by Navas. A vote was taken
and passed unanimously, 7-0.
The ninth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 24, Series of 1995, A resolution
adopting the Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning the Implementation, Operation
and Maintenance of the "E-9-1-1" Telephone Service. Tom Collins presented this item
to Council. Lapin moved to approve Resolution No. 24, Series of 1995, with a second
by Steinberg. A vote was taken and passed unanimously, 7-0.
The tenth item on the agenda was an appeal by an adjacent property owner of a DRB
approval of changes to a previously approved set of plans and an appeal of a PFC
approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an employee housing unit located at 126
Forest Road/Lot 5, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Lauren Waterton, Mike Mollica and
Tom Moorhead presented this item to Council. At the October 18, 1995 DRB me�tir�g,
the DRB approved changes to a previously approved set of plans for a new
Primary/Secondary residence to be located at 126 Forest Roac,. The DRB originally
approved the project at the June 6, 1995 DRB meeting. At the October 23, 1955 FtC
meeting, the PEC approved a Conditional Use Permit for a Type II employee housing
unit. The adjacent neighbor to the west, Mike Flannery, has appealed both of these
decisions to the Town Council. Please see the attached letters of appeal, as well as
the staff memorandum for further information. Staff recommends that both the DRB
decision and the PEC decision be upheld. Dave Lenyo and Lawrence Levine
attorneys for the Flannery's presented to council testimony as to the history of events
and facts particular to the PEC and DRB appeals. Jay Peterson objected to listening to
the full presentation. Council should only hear evidence directly relating to the two
appeals. Dave Lenyo gave Council background information on the boundary lines.
These lines are still under litigation. He wants Council to address whether this
3 v:r��..�JC'...:.,YYI..r.:,n7��r.� „h��s
Q � ' M
proposed building would fit on the property. Lawrence Levine did participate in the
DRB & PEC process regarding the "changes". However he stated the Flannery's were
not present for the original presentations last summer. Levin stated the proposed plans
do not comply with the TOV codes pertaining to "buildable square footage". Mike
Mollica stated the applicant met the zoning code requirements to place a Type II EHU
on the lot. Levine stated the GRFA calculation on the building exceeds the maximum
allowable GRFA. Lauren Watterton stated the GRFA on this building is below the
maximum and Levine is incorrectly calculating the stairs. Levine said the landscaping
calculations do not meet the TOV's code and that hardscape is not to exceed 20%.
Mollica stated the hardscape is within the guidelines. Levine believes wall heights are
incorrect per the Code. Mollica stated prior to a building permit being issued staff will
carefully review all wall heights and they must comply prior to a building permit being
issued. Levine stated the building height exceeds the 33' maximum. Mollica stated the
building height does not exceed the maximum allowable of 33'. Moorehead instructed
Council to vote separately on the finro issues. Lapin moved to uphold the PEC decision
with PEC's conditions of 1) This Employee Housing Unit shall comply with all future
regulations pertaining to Type II Employee Housing Units that may be adopted by the
Vail Town Council. 2) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed
structure, the applicant shall sign a deed restriction using the form provided by the
Town of Vail. This document will be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and
Recorder's Office and will require that the employee housing unit be permanently
restricted for employee housing, with a second by Strauch. A vote was taken and
passed unanimously 7-0. Lapin moved to uphold the DRB decision with DRB's
conditions of 1) Provide staff a new landscape plan with special attention to the
retaining wall and the area in front of the building. 2) Remove the blast protection
screen immediately upon completion of excavation. 3) Should the PEC approve the
EHU on October 23, 1995, the design of the north elevation with the EHU may
substitute for this approval, plus any incorrect wall heights shall be corrected, with a
second by Johnston. A vote was taken and passed unanimously 7-0. Levine would
like the plans he used for this meeting to be submitted for the record.
The eleventh item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. There was no
report.
There being no further business, Strauch moved to adjourn at approximately 11:15
PM.
Respectfully submitted,
(�'� �-----
Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor
ATTEST:
_ fl �1� �i1�
�� Town Clerk
('Namzs of certain ind;viduals who gave public input may be inaccurate.)
4 1/.:!2._C...�:(�'�YYI..�:.,,Yi'Iw�.. ��/�/�s
� •
characteristics, are located in the appropriate zone district. The Planning
and Environmental Commission reviewed the proposed zoning changes on
September 24, 1995 and voted 4-2-1 to recommend approval of these
changes. The two dissenting members stated that they wanted parcel #21
(proposed par 3 site) to be rezoned to the General Use District. Staff also
reviewed issues and public comments concerning the proposed rezoning of
the Mt. Bell site (#34). The PEC felt strongly that the entire Mt. Bell parcel
should be rezoned to the General Use District as per the staff memo.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No.
19, Series of 1995.
9:00 P.M. 7. Ordinance No.21, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance amending
Tom Moorhead Section 5.04.120 Transfer of License and Section 5.20.100 Exemptions; and
Steve Thompson setting forth details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No.
21, Series of 1995.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: 1) Council requested s#aff to prepare an
ordinance that woufd allow some relief from the Annual Business License fee
when a new owner occupied an existing space and began a new operation
in a space that a prior owner had paid the annual business license fee. 2)
Council requested staff to prepare amendments to our special events license
to guarantee that exempt, non-profit organizations will significantly benefit
from such special events. This direction was provided as a result of a
special event that was perceived to be nothing more than a retail sales event
that did not provide significant benefit to an exempt organization.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Staff recommends a more equitable
approach is to prorate the annual business license fee for the initial year of
operation. 2) Staff advises that the change may significantly impact special
events and sales tax revenue from those events.
9:30 P.M. 8. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1995, s cond readinc�of an ordinance providing
Mike Mollica for the major amendment of Speciaf-6evelopment District No. 31, Golden
Peak House; amending an approved development plan for Special
Development District No. 31, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail
Municipal Code; located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block
2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village 5th Filing, and
setting forth details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Applicant is requesting that Council
rescind the action take 'n regard to this Ordina ce on Sept ber 19, 5.
To scin t prev' us ction t r must b a otion ade y a oun '
me b r ho v� ed ith the� rev iling 'de u on firs ing. If h motion
� to esci carrie , hen Cou ' can rec ider the ordinance.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On September 11, 19.95, the Planning and
Environmental Commission voted (by a vote of 4-2, with Armour and Pratt
opposed) to recommend approval for the appticant's requests.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation is for approval of
the applicanYs request to modify the density section of the SDD, with regard
to the overall number of dwelling units. Additionally, staff recommends denial
of the applicant's request to modify the density/GRFA portion of the proposal.
Please see the attached staff memorandum, dated September 11, 1995, to
the Planninq and Environmental C�mmiGsi�n.
9:45 P.M. 9. Resolution No. 24, Series of 1995, A resolution adopting the
Tom Moorhead Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning the Implementation, Operation
and Maintenance of the "E-9-1-1"Telephone Service.
� !
� VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. Citizen Participation.
7:35 P.M. 2. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Minutes for the meetings of October 3 and 17, 1995.
B. Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance
Amending Section 9.22.101 A. which contains the definition for
Larceny.
7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance making
Steve Thompson supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Real Estate
Christine Anderson Transfer Tax Fund, Parking Structure Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, Police
Confiscation Fund, Facilities Maintenance Fund,Vail Marketing Fund and the
Vail Housing Fund, of the 1995 budget and the financial plan for the Town
of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as
set forth herein; and setting forth details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve Ordinance No. 22, Series of
1995 on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Staff will present the Third Quarter Financial
Report and list of required supplemental appropriations.
7:55 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance amending
Tom Moorhead Chapter 2.48, Compensation of Town Officials,Town of Vail Municipal Code.
8:05 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1995, second reading of an annual
Steve Thompson appropriation ordinance: adopting a budget and financial plan and making
appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail,
Colorado, for its fiscal year January 1, 1996, through December 31, 1996,
and providing for the levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem
property taxes due for the 1995 tax year and payable in the 1996 fiscal year.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve Ordinance No. 20, Series of
1995 on second reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Council has been reviewing the 1996
budget for several weeks. The ordinance summarizing the expenditures is
required by statute.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1995.
8:20 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1995, second reading An ordinance to change
Russ Forrest the zoning of 67 properties in the Town of Vail from their current zoning to the
Jim Curnutte Natural Area Preservation District, Outdoor Recreation District, or the
General Use District (See Exhibit A).
�CT���� ����ES��u vr ��uiv�iL: Heview tne proposed changes and
then approve, disapprove, or change the proposed rezoning of 67 properties.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On August 22, 1994, staff received approval
to amend the text of Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and Natural Open Space
District (GNOS) and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District (PUD), of the Vail
Municipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 18.33, Outdoor Recreation
District (OR). These text amendments and the proposed zoning changes,
as identified in Ordinance No. 19, are intended to insure that the uses
allowed in these zone districts are consistent with their purpose statements,
and that properties throughout Town, especially those with open space
. �'►•�,�.hf—��. � �/°°�.
. � � � m� �c►e � �. r�, «�
T a�� ��-�:.�_�.�.✓ •.�S
�,
�"�ic.:'�...- �i���.-f�-
ORDINANCE NO. 14 ��
Series of 1995 /��,��,9 S�
� =
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO.31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; AMENDING AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER
18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; LOCATED AT 278 HANSON RANCH ROAD/LOTS A,
B, AND C, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE 1ST FILING AND A PORTION OF TRACT E, VAIL
VILLAGE 5TH FILING, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS, the developer, GPH Partners, Ltd. has submitted an application for the
major amendment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31, for a certain parcel of
property within the Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing
and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village Fifth Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak
House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the SDD is in the best interests of the
community as it meets the municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on September 11, 1995, held a public hearing on the major amendment to the SDD
and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the appropriate
parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to
the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to modify the approved SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
Ordinance No.14,
1 Series of 1995
. • � •
SECTION 2
Special Development District No. 31 was established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space, employee housing, streetscape improvements and other amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental Commission,
and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be satisfied through the
imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 31 was established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District No.
31 and said 8,375 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4
The Town Council finds that the amendment to the approved development plan for SDD.
No. 31 meets each of the standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail or demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicabie, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the
amendment to the development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The amended development plan
is comprised of those plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the
following documents:
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated October 25, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, 1993 (second floor plan).
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995 and August 14,
1995 (third floor plan).
6. Sheet No. A-10, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995, (fourth floor
plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated October 25, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995 and August
Ordinance No.14,
2 Series of 1995
. • •
14, 1995 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 5
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for its
consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these standards
are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of
SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31:
A. Lot Area- The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks -The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved Development
Plans.
C. Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Building shall be as
indicated on the Approved Development Plans.
D. Densiry Control -The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not exceed
18,758 square feet. This figure includes 2,781 square feet of excess common area that has been
included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes fourteen (14)
dwelling units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94%of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans.
F. Landscaping -All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved Development
Plans.
G. Parking - As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all properties located within the Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by GPH Partners, Ltd.
paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The 1993 SDD approval required a total of 13.794
parking spaces. This 1995 major SDD amendment requires an additional 0.2197 parking
spaces. Payment into the parking fund, for the major SDD amendment portion of the project,
Ordinance No.14,
3 Series of 1995
. • •
shall occur prior the Town scheduling a framing inspection of the project, according to Section
18.52.160(B,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 6
The developer,jointly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are a part
of the Town's approval of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD No.
31, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-bedroom,
employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be a minimum size
of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance requirements and such
units shall be within the Town of Vail.
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment project,
the Golden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute $32,000.00 towards the redesign
and redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The$32,000 contribution towards the redevelopment of Seibert
Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a future Special Improvement
District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment project,
Vail Associates, Inc.,will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open space shall
be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck" easements.
A portion of the Mill Creek stream tract will be dedicated to the Town of Vail as permanent open
space and the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E will be leased to the Town of Vail for the purpose of
maintaining the park. The terms of the lease are to be agreed upon by the parties.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates, Inc.
shall reserve a public pedestrian access, across Lot C, which is located between the Golden Peak
House and the Hill Building, by declaration to be recorded with the Eagle County Recorder. Such
declaration shall be permanent and only revocable upon written agreement with the Town of Vail.
The declaration of public pedestrian access shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a Building
Permit for the project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates, at
all times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
Ordinance No.14,
4 Series of 1995
. • •
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the two accommodation units (or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association, or their successors in
interest, shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s)
which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements as set
forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail Transportation Master Plan, if and
when an improvement district(s) is formed.
9. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and GPH Partners, Ltd. shall
cooperate with, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any efforts by the Town of Vail to
establish additional view corridors or amendments to existing view corridors as enhanced by the
project. Such changes and additions shall be pursuant to the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
10. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include the
curved retail windows along the eas�ern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design Review
Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11. That GPH Partners, Ltd. further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry on
the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
13. That the proposed tar and gravet roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 7
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be
approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing
in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which do
change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by Town Council
after the above procedure has been followed. The Communiry Development Department shall
determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
Ordinance No.14,
5 Series of 1995
� � •
SECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. The
developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Municipal Code of the Town of
Vail.
SECTION 9
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and
the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 10
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 11
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other
action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and
reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
Ordinance No.14,
6 series of 1995
�
• • � •
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1995. A public hearing on this
ordinance shalf be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
on the day of , 1995, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THIS DAY OF , 1995.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
Ordinance No.14,
7 Series of 1995
ii,
��i � � . . _, .
• i
� � - �. — 7'� c�:� �o.,�.�s
- _ C �
_ _ ___
_ __ _ _ ____ _ __ . ___ __ _ _ _ _. __ __ __ _
.
_��° �_�_� � `
_� _ --- ����____ -�����-���C��� �
_-- _ -- - - —_� _�`:� � �� ����r�� �
-�— —��-��- - � �: ����C-�
,
_ ___ _ � � �-�.. t� - ..;-- � ���� �����. �� �� �' /�
�
— - - --- --- _ --------------_ _ --
�
_'���'�_ _`'- -"�c� � �����c.��� ���,� �,�' . ��
. *
.� � � . . �- ,�— � �
_ � l���� _= �_
_ �.
_ __.. �' _�_ �'��'� � a�. a�� �-'
,
, -
=�--�"�_�,�.?
_ _ _ _
} r . ��� � �,�-
� � �-� _�� _ _ ��� c� � . , _ ot�,�r��..9__�-
__--7�!� � r � _ _
< ,
� ���� �����
� , .
_----- -
I�- M
:��"'-� � '� .�" �-� s�_ - � ��� � °-- � _
_ -- __--- ----- --
� --t-- __— x --
_J ` �`� l�
_ � �_ ��� _ ��t`�_ _ � �t? �� ,��_
� .
���-�..�������"�� `�
m
---
_ ---
— --
---
�� F�
_ . � _ � ��� �°'� _ c�� � ��'! ._ �_ �`����� - - ,�
.����_ - _ �
_ .
_ __ �'�: _�_ ��
�''e"`� _ _
�
�!i
• •
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1995
1:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
1:30 P.M. 1. Site Visit - Golden Peak House - MEET AT GOLDEN PEAK
HOUSE SITE.
2:00 P.M. 2. Discussion of Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1995, an ordinance
Mike Mollica providing for the major amendment of Special Development District No.
31, Golden Peak House; amending an approved development plan for
Special Development District No. 31, in accordance with Chapter.18.40 of
the Vail Municipal Code; located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village
5th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Consider presentation of applicant
requesting Council to rescind the vote taken on Ordinance No. 14, Series
of 1995 at the meeting on September 19, 1995.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The applicant is requesting to modify the
density section of Special Development District No. 31, with regard to the
overall number of dwelling units and to modify the density/GRFA portion of
the proposal. Please see the staff memorandum dated September 11,
1995 to the Planning and Environmental Commission.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department
in it's memorandum, dated September 11, 1995 recommended approval
for the applicanYs request to modify the density section of the SDD, with
regard to the overall number of dwelling units. The staff recommended
denial of the applicanYs request to modify the density/GRFA portion of the
proposaL
2:30 P.M. 3. Discussion of Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1995, an ordinance to
Russell Forrest change the zoning of 67 properties in the Town of Vail from their
Jim Curnutte current zoning to the Natural Area Preservation District, Outdoor
Recreation District, or the General Use District.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review the proposed changes and
then approve, disapprove, or change the proposed rezoning of 67
properties. ,
` BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On August 22, 1994, staff received
approval to amend the text of Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and Natural Open
Space District (GNOS) and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District (PUD), of
the Vail Municipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 18.33, Outdoor
Recreation District (OR). These text amendments and the proposed
' zoning changes, as identified in Ordinance No. 19, are intended to insure
that the uses allowed in these zone districts are consistent with their
purpose statements, and that properties throughout Town, especially
those with open space characteristics. 31'e IOCated in tha annrnnriata �nnc
district. The Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the
proposed zoning changes on September 24, 1995 and voted 4-2-1 to
recommend approval of these changes. The two dissenting members
stated that they wanted parcel #21 (proposed par 3 site) to be rezoned to
the General Use District. Staff also reviewed issues and public comments
concerning the proposed rezoning of the Mt. Bell site (#34). The PEC felt
strongly that the entire Mt. Bell parcel should be rezoned to the General
Use District as per the staff inemo.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance
No. 19, Series of 1995.
• •
4:30 P.M. 4. Information Update.
4:40 P.M. 5. Council Reports.
4:50 P.M. 6. Other.
5:50 P.M. 7. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETINC START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
� � � � � � �
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/24/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 11/7/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 11/7/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
C:VIGENDA.WSE -
a
•
2
�
' � �
��
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1995
6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
� EXPANDED AGENDA
6:30 P.M. 1. Administrative Hearing On People's Ordinance No. 1.
7:30 P.M. 2. Citizen Participation.
7:35 P.M. 3. Consent Agenda:
A. Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance
repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973, Special
Development District No. 7, The Marriott Mark; amending an
approved Development Plan for Special Development District No. 7;
amending the Title of the Special Development District to the Marriott
Vail Mountain Resort SDD in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the
Vail Municipal Code; located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4, 7,
C, and D, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Third Filing; and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
B. Resolution No. 23, Series of 1995, a resolution designating additional
signers on an imprest checking account for Library deposit
transactions for the Town of Vail with Russ Johnson and Kathleen
Winfield as signers on that account, permitted by the Charter of the
Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado.
7:40 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1995, first reading of an annual appropriation
Steve Thompson ordinance: adopting a budget and financial plan and making appropriations
to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado, for
its fiscal year January 1, 1996, through December 31, 1996, and providing
for the levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes
due for the 1995 tax year and payable in the 1996 fiscal year.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve Ordinance No. 20, Series of
1995.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Council has been reviewing the 1996
budget for several weeks. The ordinance summarizing the expenditures is
required by statute.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1995.
.. 7:55 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1995, first reading An ordinance to change the .
Russell Forrest zoning of 67 properties in the Town of Vail from their current zoning to the
Jim Curnutte Natural Area Preservation District, Outdoor Recreation District, or the
� General Use District (See Exhibit A).
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Review the proposed changes and
then approve, disapprove, or change the proposed rezoning of 67 properties.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On August 22, 1994, staff received approval
iv ai i ici iu ii ir iex� ui �napter �rs.:sts, ureende�t and Natural Open Space
District (GNOS) and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District (PUD), of the Vail
Municipal Code, and to create a new Chapter 18.33, Outdoor Recreation
District (OR). These text amendments and the proposed zoning changes,
as identified in Ordinance No. 19, are intended to insure that the uses
allowed in these zone districts are consistent with their purpose statements,
and that properties throughout Town, especially those with open space
characteristics, are located in the appropriate zone district. The Planning
and Environmental Commission reviewed the proposed zoning changes on
September 24, 1995 and voted 4-2-1 to recommend approval of these
changes. The two dissenting members stated that they wanted parcel #21
�
� 4
�
(proposed par 3 site) to be rezoned to the General Use District. Staff also
reviewed issues and public comments concerning the proposed rezoning of
the Mt. Bell site (#34). The PEC felt strongly that the entire Mt. Bell parcel
should be rezoned to the General Use District as per the staff memo.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No.
19, Series of 1995.
8:40 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance amending
Tom Moorhead Section 5.04.120 Transfer of License and Section 5.20.100 Exemptions; and
Steve Thompson setting forth details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/modify/deny Ordinance No.
21, Series of 1995.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: 1) Council requested staff to prepare an
ordinance that would allow some relief from the Annual Business License fee
when a new owner occupied an existing space and began a new operation
in a space that a prior owner had paid the annual business license fee. 2)
Council requested staff to prepare amendments to our special events license
to guarantee that exempt, non-profit organizations will significantly benefit
from such special events. This direction was provided as a result of a
special event that was perceived to be nothing more than a retail sales event
that did not provide significant benefit to an exempt organization.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Staff recommends a more equitable
approach is to prorate the annual business license fee fQr the initial year of
operation. 2) Staff advises that the change may significantly impact special
events and sales tax revenue from those events.
9:10 P.M. 7. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance providing for
Mike Mollica the major amendment of Special Development District No. 31, Golden Peak
House; amending an approved development plan for Special Development
District No. 31, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code;
located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail Village
1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E, Vail Village 5th Filing, and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Applicant is requesting that Council
rescind the action taken in regard to this Ordinance on September 19, 1995.
To Rescind the previous action there must be a motion made by a Council
member who voted with the prevailing side upon first reading. If such motion
to rescind carries, then Council can reconsider the ordinance.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On September 11, 1995, the Planning and
Environmental Commission voted (by a vote of 4-2, with Armour and Pratt
opposed) to recommend approval for the applicanYs requests.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation is for approval of
~ the applicant's request to modify the density section of the SDD, with regard
to the overall number of dwelling units. Additionally, staff recommends denial
of the applicanYs request to modify the density/GRFA portion of the proposal.
Please see the attached staff inemorandum, dated September 11, 1995, to
the Planning and Environmental Commission.
9:55 P.M. 8. Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance amending
Tom Moorhead Section 9.22.101 A. which contains the definition for larceny.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, modify or deny Ordinance
No. 18, Series of 1995 on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On July 1, 1995, the State definition for theft
was amended by increasing the value of the thing involved from $300 to
$400. It is necessary for the Town of Vail Ordinance to remain consistent
with the State provision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Pass Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1995.
. • �
S
10:05 P.M. 9. A request for a 30-day extension of the hearing process on the appeal of the
George Ruther Cook 250 addition proposed at 1012 Eagle's Nest Circle/Lot 2, Block 6, Vail
Village 7th Filing. The applicant, Mr. Cook, is requesting that the appeals
process hearing be extended form the October 17, 1995 Vail Town Council
meeting to the November 21, 1995 evening meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or deny the applicant's
request for a 30-day extension of the appeals process hearing.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On September 27, 1995, the Town of Vail
Office of Community Development received a written request from the
Cook's adjacent property owners,Tom and Flo Steinberg, requesting that the
Design Review Board decision to approve the Cook 250 addition be
appealed to the Vail Town Council. Pursuant to Section 18.54.090(c),
appeal to Town Council,the Vail Town Council may grant a 30-day extension
to the appeals process if the Council find that there is sufficient information
available. The applicant is requesting that the appeals hearing be extended
to the November 21, 1995, Vail Town Council meeting to provide the �
opportunity for the applicanYs architect and legal counsel to be present at the
hearing. Staff is of the opinion that the unavailability of the applicant's
architect and legal counsel be interpreted as insufficient information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Upon consultation with Town Attorney, Tom
Moorhead, staff would recommend that the Vail Town Council grant an
approval of the applicanYs request for a 30-day extension of the appeals
process hearing due to insufficient information.
10:10 P.M. 10. An appeal of a DRB decision to deny an application for a reroof of the
Lauren Waterton Stevenson Residence, located at 3897 Cupine Drive/Lof 4, Block 1, Bighorn
Subdivision, 1 st Addition. Applicant: Mark and Maureen Stevenson.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold/reverse/modify the DRB's
decision.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: At the October 4, 1995 DRB meeting, the
DRB passed a motion to deny (4-1) a request for a reroof at the Stevenson
residence, replacing cedar shakes with a metal roof. The DRB based its
denial on the incompatibility with the surrounding neighborhood.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the DRB decision be
overturned and the request to reroof using a metal roof be approved by the
Town Council (see the attached memo for a complete discussion).
10:25 P.M. 11. A request for a 30-day extension of the hearing process on the appeal of the
Lauren Waterton Dews demo/rebuild using two 250's, located at 278 Rockledge Road/Lot 15,
Block 7, Vail Village 1 st Filing. Applicant: Julie Dews. The applicant is
requesting that the appeal hearing be extended from the October 17, 1995
Vail Town Council meeting to the November 7, 1995 meeting.
�' ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve or deny the applicant's
request for a 30-day extension of the appeals process hearing.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Pursuant to Section 18.54.090(c), appeal to
Town Council, the Vail Town Council may grant a 30-day extension to the
appeals process if the Council finds that there is insufficient information
available. Julie Dews has requested that the Design Review Board decision
to deny the demo/rebuild using two 250's be appealed to the Vail Town
Council. The applicant is requestina that the annPa�c hAa��►,� nA o,rto..�+o�
to November 7, 1995, Vail Town Council meeting to provide the opportunity
for the applicant to be present at the hearing. Staff is of the opinion that the
unavailability of the applicant could be interpreted as insufficient information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Upon consultation with Town Attorney, Tom
Moorhead, staff would recommend that the Vail Town Council grant an
approval of the applicant's request for a 30-day extension of the appeals
process hearing due to insufficient information.
� �
{
10:30 P.M. 12. An appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's (PEC) denial of
Randy Stouder a request for a density (GRFA) variance to allow for the conversion of attic
space to GRFA located at 3130 Booth Falls Court/Lot 6-A, Block 2, Vail
Village 12th Filing. Applicant: Jeffrey& Eileen Shiffrin.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Uphold/modify/overturn the PEC's
denial of the variance request.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:The applicants converted an area above their
garage to habitable space (GRFA) without design review approval or a
building permit. Staff became aware of the unpermitted construction after
the Fire Department responded to an alarm at the subject property.
Construction was on-going when the Fire Department arrived, and no
building permit was in evidence. The Fire Department alerted the
Community Development Department of the unpermitted construction and
the job was red-tagged (stop work order issued) on July 26, 1995. A letter
was sent to the applicant requiring that the unpermitted GRFA be removed
(copy attached). The applicant decided to request a density variance in an
attempt to gain approval to allow the GRFA to remain. On October 9, 1995
the PEC unanimously denied (by a vote 5-0) the applicant's variance
request. The applicant is appealing the PEC decision to the Town Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending denial of the
applicant's request for a density variance.
10:50 P.M. 13. Town Manager's Report.
11:00 P.M. 14. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
� � � � � � �
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/24/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 11/7/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 11l7/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
C:VIGENDA.TCE
.t.
. ��, . �
r
GPH PARTNERS, LTD. '� � �
�
ONE TURTLE CREEK VILLAGE � ,
SUITE 606 �Cj 4 1995
DALLAS, TX 75219-4471 t°�4��� r ��n�h� l ��I�r ���T
(214)523-3706 ����y�
FAX 523-3929
October 4 , 1995
Mr . Mike Mollica
Senior Planner
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
110 South Frontage Road
Vail , CO 81657
Dear Mike,
GPH Partners, Ltd. would like to again discuss the issues of
reducing density and substituting rental units as well as moving
existing GRFA to a different location in the redeveloped Golden
Peak House . I would like to appear before the Town Council on
OCtober 17 , 1995 .
The issue regarding the density reduction and substitution of
equivalent rental units is essentially the same as was defeated
by the 3 to 3 vote in September . I will present additional
background information and quantify the living space, sleeping
accommodations and rental rates for the units in question.
Additionally, I will provide the actual deed restriction
language .
In order to accommodate the owners of units 302 and 304 , I have
� reduced the GRFA in my unit 403 by 109 square feet . This was
aecom lished b movin the nor h wall back to the south a
istance of 3 ' -6" . The area vacated north of this wa will be
use to a leviate the crowded conditions in the mechanical
equipment room and duct space . This new common space will be
structurally reduced to less than 5 ' in height as was already
being done in a portion of this area . I wish to transfer the
resulting 109 square feet, together with the 3 . 1 square feet
reduced previously from my unit 401, to units 302 and 304 . This
would involve enclosing a portion of their balconies as
previously presented but would not involve transferring the
excess common into commercial to create new GRFA. Total GRFA for
the project would not exceed the 18 , 715 amount set forth in
Ordinance 28 .
r
} • .
Mike Mollica
10/4/95
Page 2
At the Town Council meeting I will also discuss the encroachment
area if Tom Moorehead deems that is appropriate .
Thanks for your continued help.
� Yours very truly,
}
� ` t
� ��
Clark S . Wil 'in ham
, � i
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 1 l, 1995
SUBJECT: A request for a Major Amendment to SDD#31, the Golden Peak House, to allow
for a modification to the approved density, located at 278 Hansen Ranch
Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E,
Vail Village Sth Filing.
Applicant: GPH Partners, Ltd.
Planner: Mike Mollica
I. BACKGROUND & DES RIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The establishment of Special Development District#31,the Golden Peak House, was approved
by the Town Council on November 2, 1993 (Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993). This approval
set the development standards and requirements for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak
House. During the early spring of 1995,the Town issued a building permit for the demolition of
the original Golden Peak House and its subsequent redevelopment. The project is currently under
construction and procceding according to the approved plans.
The applicant is currently proposing a Major Amendment to the approved Special Development
District #31, and is requesting the following:
� 1. A modification to the approved density of the Golden Peak House - a request to
eliminate two accommodation units.
2. A modification to the approved density of the Golden Peak House- a request to
convert 65.9 sq. ft. of common area to commercial floor azea and to eliminate 3.1
sq. ft. of GRFA (both of which to be "transferred"to another area of the building);
and to increase the allowable GRFA of the project by an additional 43 sq. ft.
Densitv - Number of Units
The applicant is requesting to remove two accommodation units from the project. Because
accommodation units constitute 0.5 of a dwelling unit, a total of one dwelling unit is proposed to
be removed from the allowable density. The approved density for the Golden Peak House
includes fourteen dwelling units and two accommodation units, for a total of fifteen dwelling
units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs. As currently proposed,the
F:�everyone�pec'vnemae�kydd.911 1
i � '
,
elimination of two accommodation units would reduce the overall density of the project to a total
of fourteen dwelling units. Three of the dwelling units would continue to have approved lock-
offs.
The applicant and the staff have discussed the Town's desire to have the two accommodation
units available in the short-term rental program at the Golden Peak House. To mitigate the loss
of the two accommodation units, the applicant is proposing the following:
► Accommodation Unit#310 (220 sq. ft. of GRFA)will no longer be considered a"stand-
alone"accommodation unit, as there will be an internal door connecting it with adjacent
Unit#308, and therefore, Unit#310 will be considered a lock-off associated with dwelling
Unit#308. The applicant proposes to deed restrict this lock-off, requiring it to be
included in the short-term rental program,at comparable market rates, at all times when
the lock-off is not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
► The applicant proposes to eliminate accommodation Unit#307 (288 sq. ft. of GRFA), and
incorporate this floor area into adjacent dwelling Unit#303. To substitute for the
elimination of this accommodation unit,the applicant proposes to deed restrict dwelling
Unit#304 (309 sq. ft. of GRFA), requiring it to be included in a short-term rental
program, at comparable market rates, at all times when this dwelling unit is not occupied
by the owner or his or her guests.
Density- GRFA
The applicant is proposing to enclose a portion of the exterior balconies of Units 302 and 304,
which arc located at the southeast corner of the building on the third floor. The request requires
thc addition of 54 sq. ft. of GRFA to be added to Unit 302 and 58 sq. ft. of GRFA to be added to
Unit 304, for a total of 112 sq. ft. of GRFA. This proposed balcony infill would bring this portion
of the south elcvation out flush with the building line above (on the fourth floor) n�i below(on
the second floor). 1n order to obtain the 112 sq. ft. of GRFA necessary to accomplish this
balcony infill; thc applicant is proposing the following:
► Convert a storage closet (cornmon area), located in the basement of the building,to
commercial storage. This would"free-up" 13.4 sq. ft. of GRFA.
► Convert a portion of a hallway (common area), located on the first floor,to commercial
square footage. This would "free-up" 52.5 sq. ft. of GRFA.
► Eliminate 3.1 square feet of GRFA(in Unit 401), located in the fourth floor,by shifting an
exterior wall slightly.
► Request an additional 43 sq. ft. of GRFA.
F:�everyone�pec�memos�gpealcsdd9l 1 2
4
+ • •
. �
► .
IL SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REVIEW CRITERIA
The following are the nine Special Development District review criteria to be utilized by the
Pla�ning and Environmental Commission when evaluating Special Development District proposals
and/or amendments:
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale,
bulk, building height, buffer zones,identity, character,visual integrity and
orientation.
This review criteria is relevant to the applicant's request to add an additional l 12
sq. ft. of GRFA to the third floor, as balcony enclosures for Units 302 and 304.
Although the staff acknowledges that these balcony enclosures do not add
significantly to the overall mass and bulk of the structure,the staff believes that the
enclosures will contribute to the mass of the building to a minor degree. We also
believe that the proposed enclosures detract from the azchitectural interest of the
building's south facade. The balcony enclosure would eliminate a portion of the
facade's undulation and would present a sheer four-story wall.
The staff believes that the request for additional GRFA�the request to expand
the two dweliing units is unwarranted, and overall we see no justification to
support the requests, nor do we see any positive benefits to the immediate
neighborhood as a result of the proposal.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, e�cient and workable
reladonship with surrounding uses and activity.
With regard to GRFA, the applicant is requesting that 69 sq. ft. of floor area be
reorganized internally, and that an additiona143 sq. ft. of"new"GRFA be added
to the building. Although the staff supports the concept of the intemal
rcorganization of common, GRFA and commercial spaces, we cannot support the
applicant's request to expand the "building envelope"beyond that which was
approved in 1993. Again, the staff believes tt�at the applicant's request to enclose
a portion of the balconies of Units 302 and 304 to be beneficial to the unit owners
only, and ca.n see no benefit to the community as a result of this proposal.
The staff is comfortable with the applicant's request to eliminate the two
accommodation units from the project. We believe that the applicant's proposal to
substitute other units in the building(due to the elimination of the two
accommodation units) for inclusion in the short-term rental pro.gram of the Golden
Peak House, is a reasonable request.
F:�everyone�pec\memos�peaksdd.911 3
x-
� � .
�
C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter
18.52.
A change in use from common area to commercial square footage necessitates an
additional parking requirement. Because the Golden Peak House is located in the
Commercial Core I Zone District,�which does not allow for the provision of on-site
parking, the developer will be required to pay into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu
fund. The applicant is aware of the fact that the conversion of common area to
commercial floor area will require a parking pay-in-lieu fee. As curtently
proposed, 65.9 sq. ft. of common area would be converted to commercial.floor
area. This would require 0.2197 parking spaces. The current parking fee is
calculated at$15,660.00 per space, which equates to $3,440.50 which must be
paid into the Town's parking fund. Payment shall be required prior to the Town
completing a framing inspection on the project.
D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, �
Town policies and Urban Design Plans.
The staff continues to believe that the overall redevelopment of the Golden Peak
House meets many of the goals,policies and objectives of the Town's adopted
Master Plans (Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and
Streetscape Master Plan).
With regard to this Major SDD Amendment proposal,the staff believes that this
review criteria is generally� applicable due to the limited extent and scope of the
proposed amendments to the SDD.
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect
the property on which the special development district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards, or floodplain that affect this
property.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing
on and off-site traffic circulation. �
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
F:�everyonelpec�memos�ealcsdd.911 4
.
• �
J
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff views this Major SDD Amendment request as having two separate and distinct
proposals. The staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request to modify the density
section of the SDD, with regard to the overall number of dwelling units. We support the
applicant's proposal to eliminate two accommodation units from the approved development plan,
and feel that the applicant's proposal to mitigate the loss of these two accommodation units to be
reasonable. Additionally, we find that this portion of the request meets the SDD review criteria as
outlined in Section II of this memorandum.
The staff recommends denial of the applicant's request to modify the density/GRFA portion of
the approved development plan. We do not believe that this portion of the request meets the
SDD review criteria as outlined above. Specifically, we find that the request for additional GRFA
is unwananted and provides no public benefit. We are also opposed to the applicant's proposal
to x nd thc 1993 approved "building envelope" in any manner. The Golden Peak House
redevelopment project was carefull�reviewed,both by the staff and the public, during an
approximate two-year planning process. At this time, staff finds no justification to support the
proposed expansion of the building, nor can we support the request for any additional GRFA.
F:�everyone�pec\memos�gpeaksdd.911 5
o _ : � 1N3WdOl3/13Q3a 3Sf10H �Id�d N3alOJ ;.o� .«�� ��`- � �
u ' �/
�� � r.r - � ��J�:i'��
� � .,,t,�„ D .
� ip(�.r_���:r_l,DEPT
� :� .� �� ��
V �' " � .' - Z
- �. � .. �
Q . �' ���` .
� � � ;�� � ,.�. ,� � -
/ � � � <--��. �r� �'-°- t '
. i� �.r'/ � 'l'J��;�,�` � '��} Z +
'C� �� '� '''� C J i
/�� ?i��� - ���' x ��' \ \�\•��. . �
/ -'f•".
1YjY •` a�l� '�'�F� � � j. \\\\ \\�'t O.
�V
��� ) .'.. ��� � �� �. ���, i. � �_J
��f �
- � S ��x�-..��� �Z ,.� .� �
�, �� {� ' ,�, �. _
,_. . /� .�C ' ` •>� • a!, �� '�t • • `,'1;�
... �. l.Lj/ /j `` O�rt u \�! / \ \\ ' ; �
� � � �/ `l �.��L Y}i� � \� �/ .�.
/� ' ' ':y '�?' �A � � �\ �/� �
,n a�J}�, Y�,. \'� ���''::?, ��'�'. }� a� ' �v :� �� �: � ` .,.sr �
. M� }1� {�'• -��.!--w;^ !� ��.r �-' . ��Y •� \\, '• \ 'o
��r \� �c " • � '` ~ � �� / �� , \ •:,
� \;� � t � i •a,\. , �i. � � �
" � � .\..`���• e� ��y �� .ij. �`) -a�+ ., ./ '. \ /�� � �1�
.� r � � , ��,,� ;.�7 `�; � �.-, ' , ,.� �
a a � � � .� , - j� .�„ � ?=� F,
� ' /. .s,\ ,.= �:., � ` �\j, .C. ', 1 ,!'�� / � Y"� . � ; � V
' �i (� � /�l � ' .,' e " •.\ •�, \ �
� �`•° � �J � p �.. �/ .f� '.. ��� i.3. p ��, � / .J '�_ • :e� �
..i �\ Y/�\ .\• �'� ,/ ) ' s. /\�.•,� f• �t / � �\�' a.� .
^ ;�1�\, \j\ u\ ��� "l., �� ���.� d ��^1!, � 1i�s '��/� �(! 3 �� +� � ' ._�
;���/ ,• ��'- � }�/f, �\\�} '-a � �'./vj i a��� ,` �� �1i( � / ;�-�- �
z � � • � � o ,r i � / : � �
� '• '' .. i �'.. �l } j... y// � ; �
• H y'!�(;i+%\ ]�� � c° i"f� ' I\ ,;� ;�. ; .\/ .%y ��:'� ��� \ ��:��} �,g '�
. ��, �\ ,��y y r � C ' ��,s � (�r� ��� ,J ��� � ����I i
3 � , •� °� � � �:� : �� l�> :' ��� �I
1- /�-.\ z= '•� L�4- 7� �� ^ .\� � '% � -;;`} �i,�� .. ._-� --. � �I
�]�,] \•� a•o� (�� ��_ � <r, �T �I� / . ' , .A� =o. d � •f► � ��� �_� . _ � .
.�i� 3 .�% � �r,.r.� �/; � r,r��` I.� •�(i +i Y I 9
�� ,� �'r . Ti S i .� � /. � . . .
l •\,�, . .u • � :e.� ♦/ - ��'�. �� �\` � � � � � • '
/ \//i" � ' •M�% '
` \��� .� � .� �f'•r f�yr�i� �`� ' / �Y�j� _�I �\ - 4\\iy .R � , I� I f �:'{�•��±
/
i�i ` ' /�`r j - \� � �' �i ,�. � • ", �\S ��• ' � �� i
4I '�,f\ ,�f� + � �Y+..�j O •�•• �: �\� � �� �� 1 Y� i C pI
h�� c. �.3 . h - , i' i a;s ..�yt'�>;- ;i p� _ �
•Q•`'o\ � . , �� ��_ L� v Y' S i �,
9 . ��: , x' � \ 'R, '� �' 'i 2 ' !
\ '� , � } �'.c.. - 1i '�. �1 ��-� ' • i
t .`l; `\�;`� � �� ' � i 3' `� � � S ^ _S� � c .Q , �'/ r1'-�_
'2 � ,s �� t��_ " �: ,., 11 > i '
C� � / Y< � , �,�� - �1��. � ! ,
�'s .'.Z �,\`��J'��:: :���eS�� `�,.�`r`.>, "_ .��': � — ) oa�53i; 3. _`:_ti __ :� d ,
. ,/ � � .�a ! �.+ `� y F-�17.� { M -'��II
M 1�p1/� � . �'i '.,: . V � ,� � �-f�'+� i-►� � . �
\\\•e ,_ ���5{�x/ ,� ,` �� •i . _ � t O lf , r I .
��'� ��2 • '.� � �l��l )��� ' - ,�.':Y f;� �` �� r.u� —
�\w� . � 1 } '�Y, � .I � i
. ,:'��`4� �,l-q) /+.y \ ,�, ._,'f '� ,j � ! `, ; .
\ • �'�`\ t-- � ~ •`i_I
\ ♦ ' (- i
� ,� y. - 1_-� , "- �-.. - - I - .,
�' ' ';a� �f �? � ,,. � rf - ;
. . y � � �� � �r' . � "� -� . .
��(j)�t',��� 'IMt /a �. . - �! ��I,� � c ,,� 1-p� � � � I N� .
�� F�{� �: ' ���� ' �}l� -!• r � r�� ' ��__ (� . _'_C� � � "
� .��Zidrl��'�: �: ia' _- ,_'�"��� ! I� `3 -�. � � i ' '. I
� �� � � --' - .� _ - i� 1 " �, - . V
-•�- '' " �` '" ° ar � . �,� s- `- �' ,-�-a ' , ==+-�� I _ a
� -' �y_�� • . - •_� � :. I �'_ " . '."I �a� I ' .�
« �l � � � !�) i �_. .� ; . I ' '± + . _ '• ' •�.
i �� ' S �; ' � - _ � l� � ',�
: v -�;�-� � _.. -j � ;� �\J � L ,�--r �,
.I '� . , .,� ' r �� i ,
. °_� i s J i ,d r•. � '
'_- L _, \'J �t' \;.� � I �
°�► —s ���.�_ -:j� ' a, - �_�'-�;`=1 4:- �--� _ �� � �I-;,� L �_.,P�
- i . ;�s ti —T = ",.- _
� J - •,� ;� , � � r
• � n� `_"—�—` � - --a_ � oi�iF! ,-- � - ' � ~
'�` . ; .s.-e . t.• " �_�" '__ *.s t.,,. - .. �_o,+ I �
, � "_'_'__' • -- - •
t } • s �_ �` ,I � �� , ~ .I
. 1 y a --
..i � + ur �2 � � `. .._ �ci� ��' �/, ., I ���•.
�t, ;r. :� �T � y �� # ,� � , .=,� � _ ,
'� L. �� .�� 3_ ,�� � ' I r �•i � " �I ' I
� i -� � � - ' .- _ ' - -- Q I
�, T� � �-" '_ r ' _ I I �' �` • I
i i �%1 :)� �'T `/I� � � O ���' I / / -;!: �� �
� '�-�� —_ 111.iT ff � -• � _ i--=�' �-'i °
- #� � i v� � �J� `�7 � � �t j I �� —� ,�
S �1 '
�.i d� � � 12� � 0��±"'� { 3L� .
�
��'.i .P.Y, i �.'� �.� ��.�L I �o.�L I ,i.� 1 �L;�1 i'.,j' .
'i���i� � ..,i: --t ��-.4: ��1: I .
rr • ,.1: � � �iL ' �r•,l: Y
�
F d-
i -
...-.c.. . i �
, • •
.
a, �.-�: w,,,.,�...{.��...-
,. .wn r...",°.. ���....,..�.....�
�,�,«.r-�..�-..•�,..no
- . ,i en'r/'J{'!R(/1'
11 {O
I�i 12 .,�.r�e'� � .
� o,li.t-L'4rveL►.'°► �.�EO ,K,�..-.
�r/n�IKIO IrYn4+�r'w1�f'I�.� ������1!M�9 M� `�'u��,FR
��..Iiu nr:.l��lyM,avr. I fw'�� ti4.p�
liS��ol I \�__ �- �1 -�_-' i���nrTMiP'
. �o►Mt4C _ ./ �� ^� �,n,rcn �r�..aw��ti.��+N- ��
..: i��� �-f{rI•
I � � I �I�; _ I� /MfI�i'� ry�•,�.i-U��MVF.MI[�
I.t i..' �! � r �II I�I II I III � I I�III I �I�IIi III�I I I!I� � -'_-cte l �~rm...K�eo-i...�..n...- I4�'-!�
� �� 1 �♦��,��'wJ�,�� � � i '��,��,, I ��'�i � �!�� —_ �� ..r.
� -- ' �--� I I�I I�I.I I I�' I�� �� li �I� �— y, �
Ifs'- a _ I I•� i� iI I �I��'� I i a l ��, ����I �'i I �ii {tti�—�Y-
- -__ I 'll I 1 II ( I�� � I i I �'I � I� r" �vu. �
� vr rnr�e et7 � � � � I'I'i�o'IYY ICacs!%I'!Imi�4u�Ii II�.�.�,i�l . ����.Illi�.t �i�,�i II, �I�� �,,.��a��s ►If N
i � i I � � � i i I a r��.tq !!!111 1Y d +r � I i �� i� � -^- � �.•Y w�-,n+ws+^re.
wru•..�.,i I ., I I.;, I I� � . It � � I II �i III II I I . �I I���I� II''�,'���. it L`�*
.....r...+i+r.ntv `— I I�i�i lil � � .i I i I � I� �. ili �I� � i �� i I �� �i � '''�'"i Yin.�.f/�twWH
.,c.-,.rr.�rw-' �i� � ji � � .� '. ��� i � �j� I� � ���������i��li� � � � '��'� �������.�� � � ��ii� I.� �I�� � .!� � I ����`�a„�....
�ta vctM� I �.j i �il � +..�.
.c. .r...v� i I , II� '�,�I I I �I ���.. �� ����. II I� II, lii � �ii� IIII, il � ���'. i � �.� L � I
s.�n,....eeer.. �I��.! '. - � I�',� ' ��'� �� � ��I � �� . i i � � I����I � ������il.� �� � ,� I�� � ' � ;����. �� A.,.���' �� v���L`w��_
� � � �I L� i i� � i�
I I � �i i � . 'ii�, � I i i i I � I ' ' � I ill i �II I ,��Y.a�_y.. I i.tvt��
i.wr.wc.-+�_I..� i ,Il; .i il�� II I� . �I I��i I� li ' 1� �� ' I �i I�Ili�ill!, I11� r<arn.
`,:���-Tr�:-., .
F"P��'�� ' ` 4�D wrnN�i�4.V.`�-�
'�`�y� .tw�.�rlIOYT�M�i M�f rJr+.l
yr.r�+.4LLLt�v✓•`/ 'jA10 A+�H 1'xMV�/� /l_ \`` I�� /�fG�IM1iYlG�•oG
....ti++.-+ r�i»rao.w.�,..���*`� �.,.+_-x.8►uu�*v..n ,
�p�foN� ���.- � � �
.�-._, — '�, ,��-•=�-
� / �r r va/'� i� r� tH iro��e�e',.�
r �� � i'n"°"��Yrr'_•.r...i
ENcIa�Ke .d�-�. -- , _ ,..� � •-�y-w , ,,�wr.�..�...
���c-�r:.�uatfvt/r+i Ij s°.e,�...�o..JiU.�r.r I w�.,..i+.�..�.i
o�.�o c.trif_�:N�(o.si+�•) l..�rn-i�te+'� I j J ,+w....c o....H
.�.` � ,a _ I +r�..�.--7Yr—� r,
,Y...t rrr•-" �'I i � I . � � � �� �,,�—'S.— .
„5 i 1_,.��1 I l--—- —————————'L I �.Vso�o tNEL i
���.�w.�- I�✓�, "— .-
ML •lNN �� I i '- . � I � ��"'pp q[r+n�l
, Li /E�'iwei'i I "_ ' i I..���t���L►»�Iif/
n�ii��wio.�c i� ,I .H+�.:�Y�• I I i.rn.�c,r �w
. �.sr.�.��� A ^ , w�l��Ifi�w111�., .
o b�p�.•'e. - y I / � . �4�.p�
� Y}, f�nwrlr�/ i,,,.i'ii I..f I . .!� . ' . 1
..cN ' - � � I i rlr�t Le�i=�-
..;co�e'�.. �
� s w G�.:.�-vr �' I ' � �
� wC-+.. " �. I ' . . ' � �
�' '
I � lI.IiN*G I L��.' �
� � � /'�I►�4Tlr.��.c�i.:NF� _—
�: s �r�-fY+�6''1t"K '�--
� --1 _��.__' �—�����—�
r�^ ____—_— .
�____—_��_�
,EAST ELEVATION,
- :��,,.��-o .
,...,_ . . . :. . _..
.._...,. _ .. _.:
.. . . ,.,:.. .T
, _ , . . _.
. .: .. >. _ :.,. :: :.
_ .«
. _, . .::.:: ,:.:.:,. ., : :
� ..:
. �rv i� .
� � ..
. �
rn
�
�
� �
� • R � �
w m $�
�a � _
° a Q' W �
o ¢ E = ma
c7 o c �=_
�
� ^° wa° � .� sm
U p t0 �V a°` �� y N p � a'` a
W O �� E E � c-�i,� �N y p � ��
a cn � � � � �� ` .� Rf � o` � 'U�- � � S o
' O � 'R .-- N � N � � � z �z a o � � r- O z � � m
H � � o ,= coo vv ,� �� Nc•� � =
� �Q + � d' � LQ o
�i � � N � N N � � N m N m d y y � O�
A � � a m c`�-� �,��*,,�rn � o�rn`� O � � m � Q °� o � .° D
� E o `- _
� a o�o Z � v) ui w � ��;+ c��i `r' ``' `r � .�-� �n `v°, aC oCa � r�i s �
+ m m
�
O � a
�", . �^p � y v
W o `0 y
� �v ; 8.
(s� Q 0 3 �`a
H • � � ��
o $o =�
vm
C!� w � _ � � � � � � r W
� � z � � � � � l�0 m O � ��
d c0 � N � � ' � °o
O
'(� z O r � O ��z � �� z m �
� �
� C � � m � � � � � � �
(/� <C lA � m I� N�N � ��'a m N m m m m m m �
W m (�n'L ? � � c�� N °?N c� cE0 �'? lEU cEQ m cEU tE0 � � �
CO Z 9 II) W N CD N � �Q � r- N tD N N N N N N � t0
O �
� a=
m "r
� `c
�= C.G
Q o �y
_ � E m `�2
- - ¢ ^�
C7 �°,i ="
a � o
wlx0 �9 O � O N � a � �
-� � E E T � � `�xN u, rn � � o
¢ m .:: .: � � � ,� p o � � o` � °• ,� ^
p `o �n
N � a � o00o c � z � � z � z v z `n � o s � �a �
Q Q � � � � y � b
� Z C N N iID � N � � � N m m O1 � y� �
J 1= •� ce .. •• � rn cc cp � c° 'c c� m •3 •5 a cc w �,m
Q � N N ;� N N � co �n ���$ � u� E o- Q,y rn r� � W
X �R rn ,� m m m cD rn � r> � � m X � c� � m �
Z W � cc Z � fnW W� cD� v o� � r cc a � � W t� N � � y
Q �2 �o
C� �� :
Z �a E
� c $
Z � � �o v
Q R � r t7 a
� �
� � <
W C� _ lC0 (—CO l^C4 � .!Q ¢
(� z n, y� G. w a � m o
W 9P �
= Q � m �j � � o Q o � o m 'D C C �F'� �
O NU °' � `o � "' LL ° m °' � m ' � � „i0
`° C7 � ¢ CO � m _ c7 �0 19 g'm�
ZQ > c � z `oC�3 `o R� `o > c �' � � a i �
Y � � � -� •y' c`�'+� c�"i � � - � ao � •�-p •y' Q p = m`= o
� "_ ° °
a ¢w Q > o � � v ` m � > 0 �' �- Cs=Affi
a o � � � _ . . � � Q" .e � Q`� ^ _ � L ��� ��
Z � �.nj � � o o � i0 ^ 3� ^ � � m d a a 'ud o m
Wj U C+D a � t�0 � (V O (O N Q c0 a � d n. Z Z �o't m
o �
� � � � �� �
Q � � O� . � � � °� �
� �
a � C i0 `p G 5 o C7
`m 'a '` o
N Y .. O p V p� � m 11-
° � c c E �n
a� � °f � LL � a> c '� c�o E o
= iq in = U � � iTi � a � U C7 . .
� Z ��. -�.�- ��� �% � � o,�d
C� � �, ����p, ,�� , �,,
1 �2F►4 �? �'/�'"� ' � i�1o����,� %�� ,l5
� ,-f� . � -��
�� ��'I ORDINANCE N0. 14 ��� � _�' ���11 �
e; �- 3 �� �� Series of 1995 .�.� : �
�a� 1�o
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 31, GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE; AMENDING AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER
18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE; LOCATED AT 278 HANSON RANCH ROAD/LOTS A,
B, AND C, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE 1 ST FILING AND A PORTION OF TRACT E, VAIL
VILLAGE 5TH FILING, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes special development
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS, the developer, GPH Partners, Ltd. has submitted an application for the
major amendment of Special Development District (SDD) No. 31, for a certain pa�cel of
property within the Town, legally described as Lots A, B and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing
and a portion of Tract E,Vail Village Fifth Filing and commonly referred to as the Golden Peak
House Special Development District; and
WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the SDD is in the best interests of the
community as it meets the municipal objectives identified in the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental
Commission, on September 11, 1995, held a public hearing on the major amendment to the SDD
and has submitted its recommendation to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the appropriate
parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to
the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to modify the approved SDD No. 31; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that all the procedures set forth for Special Development Districts
in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied.
�,�_ �..,�-� � o�l ,� ��-. r� .� �-�.' °�,l �-�. �,,.�.. ,�..-.� s��.
��� — ���,�,t� ���'� r�— .�� ��.. .
Ordinance No.14,
_T� _ _ /Q _ _�p Q�__.' _y� �P �,�,�'�,` • Series of 1995
if.WC/f /VT�.� �'V'�it,��L
� _ �, ., ,. 1, ,, � �K w-- (�/ZF� iG�c.�.` � w
,
L--� �e -� �, A c� '�. . S a,,p,....�,�;,� � � � � A �, �-r'r`�
� � c�,r,,.�,,.,. .�P-.-a.e_ ��.x-�. � .wl�c s�, Ini.e- y� ,�j�,e .�,`,�,�w
1�r .r� •
/
SECTION 2
Special Development District No. 31 was established to ensure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town,
provide adequate open space, employee housing, streetscape improvements and other amenities,
and promote the objectives of the Town's Zoning ordinance. The development is regarded as
complementary to the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental Commission,
and there are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be satisfied through the
imposition of standard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3
Special Development District No. 31 was established for the development on a parcel of land
comprising 8,375 square feet in the Vail Village area of the Town; Special Development District No.
31 and said 8,375 square feet may be referred to as "SDD No. 31".
SECTION 4
The Town Council finds that the amendment to the approved development plan for SDD.
No. 31 meets each of the standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail or demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution
consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Sectipn 18.40.040, the
amendment to the development plan for SDD No. 31 is approved. The amended development plan
is comprised of those plans submitted by Snowdon and Hopkins Architects, and consists of the
following documents: ,
1. Sheet No. A-1, dated October 25, 1993 (site plan).
2. Sheet No. A-6, dated October 25, 1993 (basement plan).
3. Sheet No. A-7, dated October 25, 1993 (ground floor plan).
4. Sheet No. A-8, dated October 25, 1993 (second floor plan).
5. Sheet No. A-9, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995 and August 14,
1995 (third floor plan).
6. Sheet No. A-10, dated January 12, 1995 and revised Julv 18, 1995. (fourth floor
� plan).
7. Sheet No. A-11, dated October 25, 1993 (fifth floor plan).
8. Sheet No. A-12, dated October 25, 1993 (roof plan).
9. Sheet No. A-13, dated January 12, 1995 and revised July 18, 1995 and August
Ordinance No.14,
2 Series of 1995
3 � �
t �
14, 1995 (building elevations).
10. Sheet No. A-14, dated October 25, 1993 (building sections).
11. Sheet No. A-15, dated October 25, 1993 (sun/shade analysis).
12. Sheet No. A-16, dated October 25, 1993 (View Corridor No. 1 analysis).
13. Other general submittal documents that define the development standards of the
Special Development District.
SECTION 5
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning and Environmental Commission for its
consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Town Council; these standards
are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the integrity of the development of
SDD No. 31; the following are the development standards for SDD No. 31:
A. Lot Area- The lot area shall consist of approximately 8,375 square feet.
B. Setbacks-The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved Development
Plans.
. C. Height - The maximum height of the Golden Peak House Building shall be as
indicated on the Approved Development Plans.
D. Densiry Control -The maximum GRFA for the Golden Peak House shall not exceed
�!S 2�2-P'1
18,7`�square feet. This figure includes 2� square feet of excess common area that has been
included in the GRFA. The approved density for the Golden Peak House includes fourteen (14)
dwelling units. Three of the dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs.
E. Site Coverage - The maximum site coverage for this Special Development District
shall not exceed 7,874 square feet, or 94%of the lot area, and shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plans.
F. Landscaping -All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Approved Development
Plans.
G. Parking - As provided for in Section 18.52 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Off-
Street Parking and Loading, all properties located within the Commercial Core I zone district shall
not be allowed to provide required parking on-site. Parking shall be provided by GPH Partners, Ltd.
paying into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu fund. The 1993 SDD approval required a total of 13.794
parking spaces. This 1995 major SDD amendment requires an additional 0.2197 parking
spaces. Payment into the parking fund, for the major SDD amendment portion of the project,
Ordinance No.14,
3 series or 199s
� � �
�
shall occur prior the Town scheduling a framing inspection of the project, according to Section
18.52.160(6,5) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
SECTION 6
The developer,jointly and severally, agrees with the following requirements, which are a part
of the Town's approval of this SDD No. 31:
1. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the construction of SDD No.
31, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall cause to be permanently restricted, two off-site, two-bedroom,
employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance. Each unit shall be a minimum size
of 700 square feet. The units shall meet the Town of Vail Housing Or�inance requirements and such
units shall be within the Town of VaiL
2. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Building Permit for the redevelopment project,
the Gotden Peak House Condominium Association will contribute $32,000.00 towards the redesign
and redevelopment of Seibert Circle. The$32,000 contribution towards the redevelopment of Seibert
Circle shall be credited towards the Golden Peak House, should a future Special Improvement
District be created for this project.
3. That prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment project,
Vail Associates, Inc., will dedicate open space to the Town. The minimum area of open space shall
be at least an equivalent area, to that of the area of the Tract E "overhang and deck" easements.
A portion of the Mill Creek stream tract will be dedicated to the Town of Vail as permanent open .
space and the Pirate Ship Park area of Tract E will be leased to the Town of Vail for the purpose of
maintaining the park. The terms of the lease are to be agreed upon by the parties.
4. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and Vail Associates, Inc.
shall reserve a public pedestrian access, across Lot C, which is located between the Golden Peak
House and the Hill Building, by declaration to be recorded with the Eagle County Recorder. Such
declaration shall be permanent and only revocable upon written agreement with the Town of Vail.
The declaration of public pedestrian access shall occur prior to the Town's issuance of a Building
Permit for the project.
5. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temonrarv Certific:ate nf (�r.r.��nanr.v f�r thP
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict two three-bedroom dwelling units
(Units 201 and 401) to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates, at
all times when said dwelling units are not occupied by the owner or his guests.
6. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
Ordinance No.14,
4 Series of 1995
� • •
�
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shali deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the two accommodation units (or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparabte market rates,
at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association, or their successors in
interest, shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s)
which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements as set
forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Maste� Plan and/or the Vail Transportation Master Plan, if and
when an improvement district(s) is formed.
9. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and GPH Partners, Ltd. shall
cooperate with, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any efforts by the Town of Vail to
establish additional view corridors or arnendments to existing view corridors as enhanced by the
project. Such changes and additions shall be pursuant to the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
10. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include the
curved retail windows afong the eas�tern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design Review
Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11. That GPH Partners, Ltd. further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry on
the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
13. That the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 7
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be
approved by the Planninq and Environmental Commission at a renular�v cr.hPr���iPr� n��h��� t,Aar�n�
_ . . „
in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which do
change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by Town Council
after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development Department shall
determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
Ordinance No.14,
5 Series of 1995
A 4
�
�
SECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. The
developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Municipal Code of the Town of
Vail. •
SECTION 9
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to
� be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and
the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 10
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 11
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other
action or proceeding as commenced.under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and
reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
Ordinance No.14,
6 Series ot 1995
!
• •
�
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1995. A public hearing on this
ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
on the day of , 1995, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED (IN FULL) (BY TITLE ONLY) THIS DAY OF , 1995.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
•
Ordinance No.14,
7 Senes of 1995
• •
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1995
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. Citizen Participation.
7:35 P.M. 2. Consent Agenda:
A. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1995, second reading of an ordinance
amending the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado to protect
Designated Open Space.
7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1995,first reading of an ordinance providing for
Mike Mollica the major amendment of Special Development District No. 31, Golden
Peak House; amending an approved development plan for Special
Development District No. 31, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the
Vail Municipal Code; located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots.A, B,
and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E, Vail
Village 5th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: GPH Partners, Ltd.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No.
14, Series of 1995, on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On September 11, 1995, the Planning and
Environmental Commission voted (by a vote of 4-2, with Armour and Pratt
opposed) to recommend approval of the applicant's requests.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation is for approval of
the applicanYs request to modify the density section of the SDD, with regard
to the overall number of dwelling units. Additionally, staff recommends
denial of the applicanYs request to modify the density/GRFA portion of the
proposal. Please see the attached staff memorandum, dated September 11,
1995, to the Planning and Environmental Commission.
------- ------_-__�--_ .—�
8:10 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 15, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance correcting
Tom Moorhead Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1995 which amended Chapter 17.26,
Condominium Conversions of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve ordinance.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: This is a "housekeeping" issue. In process
of re-codification it was determined that Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1995 did
not contain the correct regulations as in effect at the time of passage.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve ordinance.
8:20 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1995, first reading of an ordinance regulating
Tom Moorhead roundabouts and/or rotary traffic islands and one-way roadways.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, deny or modify ordinance.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Model Traffic Code does not address
rotary traffic islands which is necessary to regulate the roundabout.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve ordinance.
8:30 P.M. 6. Local Licensing Authority Appointment.
8:35 P.M. 7. Town Manager's Report.
8:40 P.M. 8. Adjournment.
• •
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
� � � � � � �
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,9/26/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL ALL DAY BUDGET SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/3/95, BEGINNING AT 8:00 A.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/3/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
C:WGENDA.TCE
�
rll�' •
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1995
1:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
1:0o P.M. 1. Eagle County Regional Airport Overview.
Dan Reynolds
1:30 P.M. 2. Local Licensing Authority Interviews.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Vote for one of the
two applicants to fill Liz Pickett's seat on the Local Licensing
Authority which expires June, 1996. The applicants are
David Chapin and Connie Knight.
1:45 P.M. 3. Contribution Requests.
Steve Thompson
Chris Anderson
2:45 P.M. 4. Sound Committee Report.
Tom Moorhead
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Provide staff direction
as appropriate.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The Sound Committee was
established to assist staff and provide community input to
examine and remedy the unfavorable sound environment
experienced in the Summer of 1994. The committee has
met on four occasions and its perceptions and suggestions
have been consistent with sound survey results. The 1995
season has been much better than 1994 and staff believes
that proactive and immediate reactive enforcement has been
effective.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No need for complete
overhaul in ordinance. Staff will continue to monitor closely
and work with individual locations to assure compliance.
3:15 P.M. 5. Discussion of Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1995, an ordinance
Tom Moorhead amending the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado to protect
Designated Open Space.
_ __._ _ . __ _----___
3:30 P.M. 6. Discussion of Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1995, an ordinance
Mike Mollica providing for the major amendment of Special Development
Craig Snowdon District No. 31, Golden Peak House; amending an approved
� development plan for Special Development District No. 31,
in accoraance witn �napter �tt.4u ot the vail Municipal
� Code; located at 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C,
Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E, Vail �
Village 5th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto. j
Applicant: GPH Partners, Ltd. j
�
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Listen to
presentation/ask questions relating to Ordinance No. 14,
Series of 1995.
• •
4:00 P.M. 7. Discussion Re: Exchange Parcel.
Tom Moorhead
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Consider appropriate,
potential uses of exchange parcel consistent with Village needs,
Transportation Master Plan and zoning regulations.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: Zehren & Associates have begun
site plan and architectural design for the site. The parcel is
currently zoned Natural Area Preservation District so that any
future use will require significant public process. The Town should
provide direction as to potential public uses of underground facility.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize additional study to update
and supplement Transportation Master Plan.
4:10 P.M. 8. Information Update.
4:20 P.M. 9. Council Reports.
4:30 P.M. 10. Other.
4:40 P.M. 11. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOV!!:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUB.IECT TO CHANGE)
� � � � � � �
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,9/26/95, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL ALL DAY BUDGET SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/3/95, BEGINNING AT 8:00 A.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 10/3/95, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
IIIIIII
C:WGENDA.WSE .
2
� • •
�
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shail deed restrict, the remaining two lock-offs in the
building (or equivalent), to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparable market rates,
at all times when said lock-offs are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
7. That prior to the Town's issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
redevelopment project, GPH Partners, Ltd. shall deed restrict, the two accommodation units (or
equivalent) in the building, to be included in a short-term rental program, at comparabte market rates,
at all times when said accommodation units are not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
8. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association, or their successors in
interest, shall participate in, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any improvement district(s)
which may be established by the Town of Vail for the purposes of constructing improvements as set
forth in the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan and/or the Vail Transportation Master Plan, if and
when an improvement district(s) is formed.
9. That the Golden Peak House Condominium Association and GPH Partners, Ltd. shall
cooperate with, and shall not protest or remonstrate against, any efforts by the Town of Vail to
estabtish additional view corridors or amendments to existing view corridors as enhanced by the
project. Such changes and additions shall be pursuant to the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail.
10. That the pedestrian arcade (which was originally proposed over the first floor retail
windows on the north elevation), and that the original ground floor plan, which does not include the
curved retail windows along the eas�tern portion of the building, be reviewed by the Design Review
Board and included in the final building design, if required by the Design Review Board.
11. That GPH Partners, Ltd. further articulate the first floor "retail windows", by adding
divided lights to the large single panes of glass.
12. That the Design Review Board review the proposed roof form over the main entry on
the north elevation, and determine if the roof form needs to be lowered.
13. That the proposed tar and gravef roof for the building is acceptable.
SECTION 7
Amendments to the approved development plan which do not change its substance may be
approved by the Planninq and Environmental Commission at a ren��lartv crhP�i���Ar� n��hl�� hAar�nn
in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.66.060 and 18.40.100. Amendments which do
change the substance of the development plan shall be required to be approved by Town Council
after the above procedure has been followed. The Community Development Department shall
determine what constitutes a change in the substance of the development plan.
Ordinance No.14,
CJ Series of 1995
• • �
�
�
�ECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. The
developer must meet the requirements of Section 18.40.120 of the Municipal Code of the Town of
Vail. •
SECTION 9
If any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and
the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 10
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 11
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as
provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other
action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and
reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
Ordinence No.14,
g se�es or,sss
EAST VILLAG,,,,rHOMEOWNERS ASSO� ATION, INC.
Officers: President - Bob Galvin Secretary - Gretta Parks "I'reasurer - Patrick Gramm
Directors - Judith Berko�vitz - Dolph Bridgewater - Ellie Caulkins - Ron Langley - Bill Morton - Connie Ridder
To: Planning and Environmental Commission
From: Jim Lamont, Administrator
Date: September 11, 1995
RE: Golden Peak House SDD Amendment
The Homeowners Association is sympathetic with the position taken by the planning staff
regarding this matter.
The Association maintains its position with regards to inconsistency created in the cal-
culation of GRFA by implying that there is a relationship between GRFA and common area stan-
dards as applied to commercial areas. Further, the Association maintains its position that
increasing GRFA by means of a Special Development District is a grant of special privilege.
Post Office Box 238 Vail,Colorado 8]658
Telephone:(970)827-�680 Message/FAX:(970)827-�856
1 ' • •
�
MEM RANDUM E C 0 P Y
T . FIL
O. Plannmg and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 11, 1995
SUBJECT: A request for a Major Amendment to SDD#31, the Golden Pea.k House, to allow
for a modification to the approved density, located at 278 Hansen Ranch
Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E,
Vail Village Sth Filing.
Applicant: GPH Partners, Ltd.
Planner: Mike Mollica
I. BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The establishment of Special Development District#31,the Golden Peak House, was approved
by the Town Council on November 2, 1993 (Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993). This approval
set the development standards and requirements for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak
House. During the early spring of 1995,the Town issued a building permit for the demolition of
the original Golden Peak House and its subsequent redevelopment. The project is currently under
construction and proceeding according to the approved plans.
The applicant is currently proposing a Major Amendment to the approved Special Development
District#31, and is requesting the following:
� 1. A modification to the approved density of the Golden Peak House - a request to
eliminate two accommodation units.
2. A modification to the approved density of the Golden Peak House- a request to
convert 65.9 sq. ft. of common area to commercial floor area and to eliminate 3.1
sq. ft. of GRFA (both of which to be "transferred"to another area of the building);
and to increase the allowable GRFA of the project by an additiona143 sq. ft.
Densitv - Number of Units
The applicant is requesting to remove two accommodation units from the project. Because
accommodation units constitute 0.5 of a dwelling unit, a total of one dwelling unit is proposed to
be removed from the allowable density. The approved density for the Golden Peak House
includes fourteen dwelling units and two accommodation units, for a total of fifteen dwelling
units. Three of th�dwelling units are approved to have lock-offs. As currently proposed,the
F:�everyone�pec\cnemos�gpeaksdd.911 1
�
� � .
elimination of two accommodation units would reduce the overall density of the project to a total
of fourteen dwelling units. Three of the dwelling units would continue to have approved lock-
offs.
The applicant and the staff have discussed the Town's desire to have the two accommodation
units available in the short-term rental program at the Golden Peak House. To mitigate the loss
of the two accommodation units, the applicant is proposing the following:
� ► Accommodation Unit#310 (220 sq. ft. of GRFA) will no longer be considered a"stand-
alone"accommodation unit, as there will be an internal door connecting it with adjacent
Unit#308, and therefore, Unit#310 will be considered a lock-off associated with dwelling
Unit#308. The applicant proposes to deed restrict this lock-off, requiring it to be
included in the short-term rental program, at comparable market rates, at all times when
the lock-off is not occupied by the owner or his or her guests.
► The applicant proposes to eliminate accommodation Unit#307 (288 sq. ft. of GRFA), and
incorporate this floor area into adjacent dwelling Unit#303. To substitute for the
elimination of this accommodation unit, the applicant proposes to deed restrict dwelling
Unit#304 (309 sq. ft. of GRFA),requiring it to be included in a short-term rental
program, at comparable market rates, at all times when this dwelling unit is not occupied
by the owner or his or her guests.
Density - GRFA
The applicant is proposing to enclose a portion of the exterior balconies of Units 302 and 304,
which are located at the southeast comer of the building on the third floor. The request requires
thc addition of 54 sq. ft. of GRFA to be added to Unit 302 and 58 sq. ft. of GRFA to be added to
Unit 304, for a total of 112 sq. ft. of GRFA. This proposed balcony infill would bring this portion
of the south elevation out flush with the building line above (on the fourth floor) n�below (on
• the second floor). In order to obtain the 112 sq. ft. of GRFA necessary to accomplish this
balcony infill, thc applicant is proposing the following:
► Convert a storage closet (common area), located in the basement of the building,to
commercial storage. This would"free-up" 13.4 sq. ft. of GRFA.
► Convert a portion of a hallway (common area), located on the first floor,to commercial
square footage. This would "free-up" 52.5 sq. ft. of GRFA.
► Eliminate 3.l square feet of GRFA(in Unit 401), located in the fourth floor,by shifting an
cxterior wall slightly.
► Request an additional 43 sq. ft. of GRFA.
F:�everyone�pec�memos�k.vdd.911 G
t • •
II. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRI T REVIEW RITERIA
The following are the nine Special Development District review criteria to be utilized by the
Planning and Environmental Commission when evaluating Special Development District proposals
and/or amendments:
A. Design compati6ility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale,
bulk, building height, buffer zones,identity, character,visual integrity and
orientation.
This review criteria is relevant to the applicanYs request to add an additional 112
sq. ft. of GRFA to the third floor, as balcony enclosures for Units 302 and 304.
Although the staff acknowledges that these balcony enclosures do not add
significantly to the overall mass and bulk of the structure,the staff believes that the
enclosures will contribute to the mass of the building to a minor degree. We also
believe that the proposed enclosures detract from the architectural interest of the
building's south facade. The balcony enclosure would eliminate a portion of the
facade's undulation and would present a sheer four-story wall.
The staff believes that the request for additional GRFA�the request to expand
the two dwelling units is unwarranted, and overall we see no justification to
support the requests, nor do we see any positive benefits to the immediate
neighborhood as a result of the proposal.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
With regard to GRFA, the applicant is requesting that 69 sq. ft. of floor area be
reorganized intcrnally, and that an additiona143 sq. ft. of"new"GRFA be added
to the building. Although the staff supports the concept of the intemal
rcorganization of common, GRFA and commercial spaces, we cannot support the
applicant's reyuest to expand the "building envelope"beyond that which was
approved in 1993. Again, the staff believes that the applicant's request to enclose
a portion of the balconies of Units 302 and 304 to be beneficial to the unit owners
only, and can see no benefit to the community as a result of this proposal.
The staff is comfortable with the applicant's request to eliminate the two
accommoda.tion units from the project. We believe that the applicant's proposal to
substitute other units in the building (due to the elimination of the two
accommodation units) for inclusion in the short-term rental program of the Golden
Peak House, is a reasonable request.
F:�everyone�pec\memos�peaksdd.911 3
L
• � ,
Y
C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter
18.52.
A change in use from common area to commercial square footage necessitates an
additional parking requirement. Because the Golden Peak House is located in the
Commercial Core I Zone District, which does not allow for the provision of on-site
parking, the developer will be requirad to pay into the Town's parking pay-in-lieu
fund. The applicant is aware of the fact that the conversion of common area to
commercial floor area will require a parking pay-in-lieu fee. As ci,urently
proposed, 65.9 sq: ft. of common area would be converted to commercial:floor
area. This would require 0.2197 parking spaces. The current parking fee is
calculated at$15,660.00 per space, which equates to $3,440.50 which must be
paid into the Town's parking fund. Payment shall be required prior to the Town
completing a framing inspection on the project.
� D. Conformity with the applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, �
Town policies and Urban Design Plans.
The staff continues to believe that the overall redevelopment of the Golden Peak
House meets many of the goals,policies and objectives of the Town's adopted
Master Plans(Vail Village Master Plan, Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and
Streetscape Master Plan).
With regard to this Major SDD Amendment proposal,the staff believes that this
review criteria is generally ng� applicable due to the limited extent and scope of the
proposed amendments to the SDD.
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect
the property on which the special development district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards, or floodplain that affect this ,
ProPcrtY•
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to
produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
The staffbelieves that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing
on and off-site traffic circulation.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
F:�everyone�peclmemos�gpeaksdd.911 4
.
• •
.
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
The staffbelieves that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintairt a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
The staff believes that this review criteria is not applicable to the applicant's
proposed Major SDD Amendment.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff views this Major SDD Amendment request as having two separate and distinct
proposals. T'he staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request to modify the density
section of the SDD, with regard to the overall number of dwelling units. We support the
applicant's proposal to eliminate two accommodation units from the approved development plan,
and feel that the applicant's proposal to mitigate the loss of these two accommodation units to be
reasonable. Additionally, we find that this portion of the request meets the SDD review criteria as
outlined in Section II of this mernorandum.
The staff recommends denial of the applicant's request to modify the density/GRFA portion of
the approved development plan. We do not believe that this portion of the request meets the
SDD review criteria as outlined above. Specifically, we find that the request for additional GRFA
is unwarranted and provides no public benefit. We are also opposed to the applicant's proposal
to x n the 1993 approved "building envelope" in any manner. The Golden Peak House
• redevelopmcnt project was carefull� reviewed, both by the staff and the public,during an
approximatc two-year planning process. At this time, staff finds no justification to suppork the
proposed expansion of the building, nor can we support the request for any additional GRFA.
F:�everyone�pec\memos�gpeaksdd.911 5
« -; , � 1N3WdOl3/13Q3a 3Sf10H �It��d N3OlOJ .0>6, -��� 4'-`- � �
o �; . ��
V �/ .r►' ,. :,,.,1; 4
�.i � T ��:��v5�
�
,� u,r,m, ,
- ; TQV.r��,�,�:;'.DEPT
� .: �� �C��
V r ° � .� •
...� � � •.,
Q '' ��%' .
^ � � /� �� ` � -
a.� ; � - �;.. -r,{� -a. � o
� �•"� � ���►�.:.., v z ',
�
� � _ ,� � '�\. � � �
��, ��,`+ �;,-/ Y �.,�.� �,. �/¢�
�YF�/ � �� ��Y� � \ V
J\� . ��� 't:� � �• \\\ V\�, 0
. \�.� ,-!' �% r �. :' •�_ ' �J.
. . � ,'\�\�� �.eR�T� �1 � ,�' �.
,_. . /. E� x' %�`. `i
< �r � `•� ���' '�� /�� '�� , ��� F-
... 1 .� Y �\
. ' ;ti `• . �'� � �: O Z�I� ' \�'��� ' � \j o
' /� �J� r�y•Z:(�1%, - , ,•?�����y :\• ./� '�K'�� \•. \ u
a ro �1� �. '��� , �� T ` •�_ �r ��,Y ..���`\ %•.\ .� .
� � �...�-w�y^ ia \a +�. �
p ��' - /�� j i�Y '� � '2
�r \ � , . i' � : •r, y � � \, � ,. ,
. � � / .�\ ���., s�L�%+�/ �a -�\ , �/, �� ,i�� � ` i:/' .` \ �'� � J�
a �t' ! /' �/''��L� �y�� ��' �'� �� "'. Z
6. o � V „ � � {� .� •a�� i� j�' .i � , \ �� ` V
�' G', ���,\ ••�, \ �i' l 3` x'F. * .1'.'y,�:K�. ' ` .. � \,� . ;. 4
.�(-) y'' \ •`• �
. ,i J \ j � � �i. �, ��w ..� T'. �i,,',(/ �� ��'a�� '�
.v v� -� `\ p� b �\ ..� .� �. ±�1 �.�� �. � z �� a.�
' n '`\� .� \ �"`;� �;`��, �-,,.�} ��i� a �,.�:z �1 ; �t .�: 3 ° ~ ,l' � __�
� \�� �i', � �� t�, t \�} , �'f � /r/- i� .?l%J ±s Qjl ; / . Y� / l ..!_ i
'_\ � �� . � � <> 1 � u `+ �, '� R i 2 . !` � �
vY '. L+� . �� �� ` � _. � / � • !" C � � w' i � "
1 -' � i•-+ / �
i •� ������'e��� 1 � 't.� ���� , � % �}`- . �. �� •�';f� ��� �,�� �,4 «i �
��� `\r e\ iL +� ":\ _ � � ���'� �i � ������� ���� I � ,
I\.,� r , . � � ' ��' i �' � .
d-/ �t\'a�� Q-� �7}� �� ,�\ ,\o \� 'i �^� �� a.•c' - �-- ; I
� Y�il . .;3 v� ��bl,� t�' � �T .�l ••\ � r Y� •AR.r ���c\ •��� � ,�' � � - �� ! ..
�il � � .1���� ��Ci � �l\ �/T/[�. �•Z.i1 �. '/s�\ � i � + � ! .
�� \��✓//� i �o .! � \f � � 'r�'%� � �.. �.
J %�'/•.. � 1" y�a >\/� '\ _ �l i��\ � t I ' ..;.:.t
\"'"�. ..'!J /�.� \r , V1�aL/ . /L '� . _ r �� 1l ' � , � , I i,
,+y�, �` �. �� j i� i'� - �/ � �- �. \yu• � � �•� � � y•� � i � I _ .I '
!'u!�� F �\ar���, �, � '+�' /� •�'ir� 1\� � + ��.t '�a.�'V)� ,�}-' -f H.� � c r ;
� T1 '9� � • �' /�' � � 1 �� ' . V Y� �� Yi � - - �
.S �\ , \`� /\�� . � 'E. '� ►� ''I 2 '' � 1
�� '�.t.. .tii � 1 S � I
�,3" , . .� " _ —
i -z .�i � ����� �' / •; ��� � _ ;�._ " _.�.. � o�� ii ;�y ' �� ; .
� �^i� �� �r. .���— � . . _ :i' "
1( ., ' � � , • M 1���. �1 � I ' '�)
, 5` \ '.�� ./ ,.���lS3�3 1A�I. .�e� - ��"" . x- — I ;a�iiii }:� _`;' � -- � ,
a :' �/ ��a ,. , l. .� y � a �i �!'I 3 � k � , '-' °
\� , �'�i: �i 'r '' . � � � f F � �-1� I
��� ����ld k� . '� i� � � 't- j Z� 0 ���� � � �
� �52�_ ��� � // A - ,��•Y I� •' ] �i� �� -'— � �_�
S'� . ���c� �:_.-`�1'l `)�j '• ' •. ._ Y� I I i
L..
'��/i��� ���•�) �,�-�, � °' -�` n� 'a � ( a�� I �
� � \ ,� '1\ r-- ��� y - . �
� \\•�` �` j . �� -- ,�•�`•`i .t.�, , - I flr` -,1
. ,1\/�` �1;�t _ O y , ,�r .., ' J Q , '7 r . I I i „1
1 /I r / � ✓ � 1 .I .� �
.('.�l�Y,�'� � '��1 i �M■ ( + . .- - �` I�� � C ,� ��. '�J � ' 1 �f '
-�\ f f�3�`�W\. _" 7'�j r1' !.i � 1 Y� __ .__ �_, �.
� _�
.��d�mcti �Y —� i i _- .' �6'��� ! I I"/c� -'�t ' �, \ 1 I� I
�`` _�` � �� --�-- `'- - � �-- - -- - 1� � -- . V
_•�_• 1' . Y t lI�` "���'�1 '�� I � �q.{� �' I _ 0�
� -� •�_� • . -��J_•_' •i t�_ � � �~I �a� I -� . � .
w 11 :'��.: 1 l..) i �' u, ; �_� �� • ' —.�- ���
� -s: S ( . � � {-+� '� I ' '�
`y �- - V f1-�•,1 1 .;, 1�� � , - \� _,_�_ y �b . �' e'
�I s��t �_ ��S �_I 1� �d � /-•� � • r \� I �_'�
� L . �_J •� �� � z
:��--�----r �r�� �. . � _ ��>_� ��F`.� . � , - �: ,�_ ,� ,�
;�F --- r —:� �I� a. _'3�=�' „ �-- " �' � ' _�-;" .,�
_ L,. , '� _ �. �Y �'�-- . r
+ �`�� �-c'' � -- I ' a : 9
��' � ��_ ' _�— I ��IilFt� � � � g~9
�7 s..s ♦. _ _. — �� C
I� \ ��_�_. � �T.• �.w�•L i �f 1.. .��.._��_i � '
� ---- '.' L' — . 7l :� � •� I -
' t �� � `.'�Y_"' � i�i � .____. ��. .
' + �r �r '� , ..%�' � I �_� ��
�r �� �� � � �'
��t �. .� ���* .�' 'A��; I � i ,;��:;= j =� � ; i
, ,` ��
� � .� ;
! -� -�TY" °,/__ - •— - - . - - -
2. . �I \�', �\i�� � �:/•� I � O � ZI 1�� •/ ,, ���i �1 � '�
� �'V/� ! � T �' H�" r+" - �� �--"��-�'�
� -- 1 l.i_ - - -- ' �
, I �� � ; v� : Gi � 7 i � 1} i i I �� --_i-
;i `�-i�t � 1� � ���. i ;L�
��'.1 .Q.Y' i �S .J Is"` � 'v'�L I �L'f� � •i:�1+' i�7•�s� � �
'S�i'� - •,t: --rt �J.,�: �,�. -
.+ . ,�: � — .—�L .�-a: f ►
�
F �
... I ,.. .G., i ,�
• •
.
pj 1+I'G: yy�H�trl.4Jt+E�
J� �� 1+�'N�Y r�C Pr��1�w'�MI
. - .�✓r�Y��.'C�wr�v^��.uKo
� !i On Ye`Jf•'�'R/^'1'
�1 �Q
�� �ti �
�E�GD +MiNC��.
- �F I.T•L�Cr+,�yL uwv► �� uu�... .
�i��r�wiol.iwW..��..i'*Ir\ ,y';�,y°.��wo � �f`��
�...:n.,n.�..�i.r.+ I � fs"�'�° I 11A'.a'
� �, �l�sb�.,, i\ _ . — 1 ----- 11_- ;r�L�.�.T�r p
� . '�Y r ai ru�t _ .i � �' �.n.sr +��.�w�+aa/YL�^�I/r- ��
. ' - �..-re..� .
- I I i ��I .I � � �� �%.`.v'�... .,u,yr-or...-.a.�nr�
. ��i��' � I� ��� ��� ��� ��il �� � ����� ���������I��� ����!i �I T � ii� � �*m...��co-w.u+n...- �
� C., - �1:��'li �
1. �i�l i�il I � � i ���; � � � I � � � � � !� — — T T
' � I � II I I � r
� IIS�,� �� i I i .i � , . {11�b
� br�nccc , �U .�- . II iI II � ili�i lil II � I I!I��� li II il � i �I I i��l�� ��� �' .
_.p�-- ' �I I i ��I� � �, ('I �I � I nfrN t�vu.
7 --- i (� t t,u f l F I c.o 4.w�o��w� i l i � I i i � i I I�I��i�l��.�
wr.o•..ci.�i !_ � � � �I I ' i ari�,.erat TN�."'�*' � I�Ii 'I � I� i � i ,I �I e��� �.«.) I�� •»rw�-x.+ws.�rr-
....r�ui•�,�.w lill �,I i�. � lii�� � � � �1 III I � I, II ,t ill I�.I I I I� I I�1' .c+t...+�.
J � � I , I II�� , � � , �� �I��„I � i � , , �l �� � ; � J�,...
Me+�.r r.�.v.- il �.'i� �' �I I ��I i�' � l i �. i�l�l"i i�� il.� �� . L�i� I .II ii i.l � .e ��� c„-r....
�L6 r+G'.+✓. ,.I � I� I� I �� � , � I �I i .� ���,I' i III i� � i-' ��il I i �I� �-f o....r�a�
^ fn�rter-+nr.�t//� IIIIII �.'�i I Ill�,i, I��II I I IIII 'I�III I I II ('���I I I' I � ��� 'I I�,� I I II`� I �� � �I . I I 't
... nti++tcW�.. I I �� 1 I � i i I I I � �,� I' I � �I : � � � ' �I v„� tow'•���
I i I �i i li 'i I i �I I �I1� � li i I �i it�� y I!ii
�.��:...w..o..-i- I �'i,��il Ill�li IIII �I�ii ���I i ' I �I �illil�I., . ,�-'`i'� I ►o�rMUVS��
...:,..co-*t�+-�- � .
`:..v�-r . 1 ` enti�n n-�.nN.s.t.�-�..
ere+o iL+� trta wn n+.w w/ i~ � �+..ro�*�r..r..c o�.�
�-:....:�..�c�r::✓� r�..roA.w��v c.r--r ��` ��--�'nre-.x�.�o..oa
o�,.+,+--tir.5�u..*u.» �
�~Yi /// A
�a�toN� ;� — ` � „'-' '
� -s.- _ ��"_
1 `�i i�/v� j �i( � �� T�rllro i.E��
` I I � hq'�K'JMY!'��4_.i
ENc1a�Re �� -- _ o_ r.,.-w , ,�w�.�
' ��r.�-��wl+,t�r(vr�� � ccwa..�v...Jiu.��.r � wn.,..,��...i
o rc.ro ..�.rc�tMif'.�:Hr(va/v�) �iiM�tC'r�G I � .r•.,.+w...�c vsr.��.�.
�;.� >.- �'�r I +�fur�..�1YP --�\ . �" i
I J ��
.«s�..�-- � � D�s a J
'��ir...�..~,= / I��.I I�-------------1 � I r.Fsa.+o6e�u%��
ML lrN I .. . . I . ��:/✓b D![�o�Iif/
Li�K�'�Ki..i I � _ ' 'F�rT�!i+
wi��f/�r��u��t 'I �r��`�Y��! I �I T.rlo.�►�M'/+N
� 'O�L UL
aY �' wcr�.irifr•J�'_�,
� ri Y~.�.+�- `a ,i�.l�'� I ''/ _ I I . 11.i�01
4N I . '��- " � . 1
_.�o�e-,.,_ I � nr..t ie+s'.
^�u::-�. �' I I I
i. I I I
� � ...+wn. � � �,•.,, �
..,,.�y..+.�.-
.0��.,v..v....�,. k4---•—'�.._
I: I - j '7 _�. �sHt�* ,
� -------
."_�--�---------------------- ----
,EAST ELEVATION,
-af�-i'-o -
..:., ....., ..
_, . . _:. ..:.,_. .... - _,.... _
._-.. .... _. :.. :,,,,.
. ..�. .�.
�
.,:_ . .: '<.: ;: :: ;:, �:;x. :
:, . _ .. ... .. . . . .... """.�' _...".'.__s......,. ....
� ;
,-� i �,.. ,�,�
t
.
� � I l•95' �1�� -- ��� � h'1� S�� A-��.-A,.�
�
C�..0 bv --� • �.e.�►�, ��,.a.�,, -
� s.►�,c�,, - ,,,�.�.-°„ ��
'�- -�`�- _
e � �:� � .�w��.
�� - ,�. ��,,...�.. .�. �- � ,� -
,
." A/�'� a� .►�-a`-� ,
�` , � " -�� ���°� ' _
�ti;G'�-.. — a��� ,U,�..—� �r .��-e. �� �' �0 7, �
_---_ - �/o ,� aK � �. ��-�� -
. . - �l-� p1��.,,�C ,�vw�- a`�t��, ____ _- .. - -
� �- µ-� ��.� - l�Q .�.,-. A�t� �
.-- o K �� �..�,�'� .�e a°-� ' ' .. �,��.. `'
h����. .- Q�- �--� P.�� � l� �,�,.� ---r �e 7�v � /�2 �
. . rr-�YL -C�� G�'/�.
.. ' O K �--� ' G�F'A .
��— .` �-e�.�- �--/ G�?���� Ce� I�U'�>
Q 0� �, ������ . _ _
p� .- �.�y�.. �r �4c.�� -
.-- 1'✓1� � ��� � � _
� .
l. .�,r-- -- W l��-�- �Z;-�i�e � 2 ,�,�ee,,C,, ,
�.
-- L� , -,�`�/-L��,�-,-._ �,,-�-oY. �t,�e �.��oc� � a�- Z'"�=�
� �it.ow� '. �a�w; "' icv�,.;.� �� � A�c t}4 ( ,
—� �
� ' d�� ,� -< �z
,���'"' - �-�� �/d-Fe : � - � ���- �'��>
�
• ..y ; � � Z
, �J
3
l"'���'�f- �"'� ��=_ - � � r — �'o v��,Ge
� � � .u-�•�._, �.e.�,.. iu;,-�-� �..
%��� ��t-c,�c.c�...
-y � � �. -� -
_ 2 "� - `t��
V'�-�: �f-- 2 ��-� � P�-� �
���
.
. �
i
� • •
i
�
; �
C�j . A � r�,=�- _ � �, �� s
/� � -�� G2�'�9 _-------------- -
— __ ; ./
� � ____ _ —-- _ . 18`� '7 S �
,
: �
� . . f� Cer�-.�. � = 2, �"�7 C� M ��ri4 a-�e,
�
2, �S � � _
� . . i 2�.�. � ¢� � G��r�
I I
. -��
��
. . 3
l( �
,
� � GKr
,� _
. . • q � �;,��---��F�—T���__�_o� � l 0 9 �— —
��__ _ �i'� ,G.. 11,�..:,� � �0( - �' ---
�°�MhM!'f �� --------_ �� /� �
1
��� �„Y.,� � ' , _ �6 y�
_ �s�� - �;�'-�`� ��- �,
- ��
: � 7 �r �
`
R ' a�cn�L- ,�,►,_ ,..e...� 't
O � � -,�� �� �2 ----� 2 01 �-rC �-a 1
0 2 �� _�� _� 3� 9 �, o,� �c 2 0 � �, ��
� s� ,� �v�. , � 7 � IO�. o� � 30�
�� ��
•
F:�everyone�pec\memos�gpeaksdd.911 3
. � � • .
�/ 6 ��5 (�l t�-�
,
- . - . .�1-�j ►�_ I�k�,_i`��alli� �.GSw �GY�S . __- -
_ _ . n - _ --- — - . _ . _ -
� � - -- --- � _ . _ _ ___ __ _ -- --
2� -��o _ _-�u � ��-� 1 ��►���,�►��� _ __ _
-- - �— ..�� --
_ , '�-. "_�'��►� ( Ge w�►�i�"w►a�wf - ( �K ._�-- .._- _ _ _ -
— -- - --- ---_— -�-� - ----�-s--�� --
_
_ _- _ _ . 3n0 -_ ���i- ���5���,tG � ��_ ___ _ -- __ . _- _ --- _ _ ----- -
_ _. . � 310. f d���o ) � t���f� �b5f����f� �
� � �
. - � l o��-o�{ � ��_� C�►L�f ��-�,k���v �07 a�) -------_ ___ _ ------- _- ---- - -
_.
__ ___ _ __-----___�
p- 20f/�6[ – z-�� w� ����f �o�►�►����h�
.o �� , _
__ _ _ ___
�Q ��� 4�����
�
_
���lE� ��dl G��G�
i��
° G1'Vll4ar5 l 6�vi _ 5�,r.Gla. I►� tnSQ►��� � G9(m h� , �?�i 1��
�
. ° G�'I�-a�f�r—�� G.��a�s c�+ s f 5 0'�� `V'��G�'►r'�r o-� �a�l. � .
o �d�{c�-�r� a� d«�j-�►1/ GaVv�UV�. 4�r�(�-(� ��l `�. _ 52. . 5
o, V''��'���"It'►'+ 7'b I�n��' �J� _ . _ __ ��'6 �. _ - - - ___ _ _
_ . . ° Y��G�t� �'D �� ��h�- 7�i�tt�'1('►? _ __ _ -__ __ __ _- -- -
---- ._ _ . _�_. _---- b _ 1 -1 __ _--_-�_..�
� �
_ __ _ _ - - - --- �
- _ __ __, , _ . __- - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _---- _
__ _ _ __ _
_ _ _
. , .
__-- _:__. �.�o_ � _����«�� ���ts w�<< �o+ h�_ ,�s�� ����1 _��►-�� ����Gfi��,� a�, �h— ���,
.
_ .�.��c�r��c r'� _ e� ��aM _��z��e � U�SS� - _ _ _ _ ---- _ -------- -
° �1��`� SY�� �9r�' iLa4F. :
_
.° ��G►�5�, aG�'a54 �-8�"rG �
r
, �
�
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 970 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX 476-7491
September 6, 1995
Mr. Mike Mollica
Senior Planner
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mike,
I am following up on my letter to you of August 14, 1995, and our
recent telephone conversations . There are several issues that
need clarification concerning the Golden Peak House redevelopment,
major amendment to SDD No. 31 application, submitted to you on
August 14, 1995 .
Instead of Units 303 and 305 being combined and density reduced
(as noted in my August 14, 1995 letter) ; the unit density
reduction comes from eliminating a kitchen unit from Unit 203 and
having Unit 203 as a lock-off of Unit 201 . By doing so, the
density is reduced by one dwelling unit, as noted in my letter.
We still intend to request the elimination of the two
accommodation units ( 307 and 310) . The other main issue discussed
pertains to the commitment of maintaining (within the Golden Peak
House building) equivalent rental (sleeping rooms ) obligations as
originally established in the SDD ordinance. It is
GPH Partners, Ltd. ' s intention to commit to the Town of Vail a
comparable number of sleeping rooms (whether accommodation units,
lock-offs or dwelling units ) to satisfy the "equivalent"
obligations of the original SDD ordinance.
Your other concern was Alpine Engineering' s classification of
"separately defined" spaces on the fourth und fifth floors for
their area calculation summary. The 60 . 8 and 48 . 6 square feet
numbers were included in our common (or excess common) calculation
of 5, 413 . 2 square feet . The philosophical issues as�oc�_ated with
the square footage calculations in general will prcbably need tc
be addressed separately.
. . . 2
~ o •
Mike Mollica
September 6, 1995
Page 2
If you have any question, do not hesitate to call . Clark and I
look forward to meeting with you at 11 : 00 a.m. on September 6, and
presenting our application to the PEC on September 11, 1995 .
Sincerely,
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS • ARCHITECTS
Crai N. Snowdon
• �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 970 476-2201 ''���` ;
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX 476-7491 �,��. : `
��a • _-�
August 14, 1995 ��a i � ���g �
� �PT
�..
� ,
."'��i`� ���:�i��� ,
�
Mr. Mike Mollica
Senior Planner
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
110 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mike,
Attached is an application for a major amendment to SDD No. 31
(Golden Peak House, 278 Hansen Ranch Road} . As you are aware, the
development of the Golden Peak House is underway and scheduled for
completion in November 1995 .
GPH Partners, Ltd. , as developers of the project, would like to
modify the proposed density of the project which automatically
places the request in a major amendment category by reducing it.
The reduction in density would be as follows :
r �of CO2/teCl�
1 . Units 303 (DU) , �7) and 307 (AJ) would be combined into
a single Dwelling Unit 303 (a reduction of � of density} . ^� ��
D, 5
2 . Conversion of Unit 310 (AU) to a lock-off of Unit 308 (a -I-o'�q( '
reduction of 0 . 5 of density) .
In addition, GPH Partners has retained the firm of Alpine
Engineering, Inc . from Edwards, Colorado to analyse the square
footages of Snowdon and Hopkins floor plans ( sheets A2-A7 dated
1/12/95 and revised 7/18/95 ) to have an independent study of
square footages (based on actual built dimensions) and uses
available for review by all parties . Their analysis (as shown on
drawings 1-3 dated 8/14/95) and attached summarize their
calculations as follows :
l . Commercial - 13, 836 . 1 square feet
2 . GRFA - 15, 568 . 3 square feet
3 . Common - 5, 413 . 2 square feet (2 , 345 allowed common)
ApP2�veo� _ 1�'�opesPrf_ . . . 2
30'7 = �1.1 D '�03/307 = �� '""'_. ^p�—
� 30� = �U w, �o (� Lost �. �4u�2
� � 3/0 = �CoeKot�-� o f '308' � Lose � ��
Z 3�0 = Al1
� ���ff I �0
• �
Mike Mollica
August 14, 1995
Page 2
Based on Ordinance 28, Section 7D, we are allowed a maximum of
GRFA of 18, 715 square feet of which 2, 847 excess common has been
included in the total GRFA. As the above calculations indicate,
by combining the excess common square footage ( 3, 068 . 2 square
feet) and the GRFA ( 15, 568 . 3 square feet) a total of 18, 636 . 5
square feet is obtained. This is 78 . 5 square feet below the
maximum allowed of 18, 715 noted in Section 7D of Ordinance 28 .
GPH Partners would like to use the available 78 . 5 square footage
along with an additional 34 square feet to expand units 302 and
304 out to the approved building line of the south face to align
with the second floor (below) and fourth floor (above) .
The above noted modifications effect Section 6 ( sheet A9, third
floor) ; Section 7D (Density Control ) by reducing dwelling units to
13 and accommodation units to 0 for a reduction of two dwelling
units to the total of 15 dwelling units ( 13 proposed) ; Section 7G
(Parking) as it relates to reduced density; and Section 8,
paragraph 7 as accommodation units have been eliminated from the
proposal . All other sections of Ordinance 28 are unchanged.
With this submittal, our hope is to present these changes at your
regularly scheduled PEC meeting on September 11, 1995, and then go
before Town Council at their earliest meeting for review.
If you have any questions or need additional information
concerning this matter, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
.
Crai Snowdon
/kr
0 �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ������ �� �� °����D��Q�
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 oATE � � �oB No
ATTENTION �
TO � J/ RE y,� ;��--�,3
�` ` � g ___„�
i � —
�' G . �i {� � i
�. ,�
� �
. �
WE ARE SENDING YOU �Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following �s: �,=`� - --
- b - .� .
O Copy of letter ❑ Change order C
❑ Shop drawings L� Prints [� Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
g � � J S � �
� � � h � �
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
� As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
� For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
,� For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
� /� < " � r � � �
cs - � s
�<
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notity us at once.
� � -
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE tS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on September 11, 1995, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In ,
consideration of:
1. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed amendment to Chapter 18.39 of the
Vail Municipal Code ( Ski Base Recreation) and an amendment to ihe previously
approved development plan to allow for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak Ski Base,
. located at 485 Vail Valley Drive /Tract F, Vail Village 5th filing and Tract B, Vail Village
7th filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates Inc., represented by David Corbin
Planner: Jim Curnutte and Lauren Waterton
2. A request for a rezoning of various properties throughout Town, (as described on the
attached Exhibit A), from their current zoning designation to the NADP, GU, or OR Zone
Districts.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte & Russ Forrest
A request for a Major SDD Amendment to the SDD #31, the Golden Peak House, to allow
for a modification to the approved density, located af 278 Hansen Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
and C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing and a portion of Tract E.
Applicant: GPH Partners, Ltd.
Planner: Mike Mollica
4. An appeal of an administrative decision by the Zoning Administration to deny issuance of
a building permit, located at 5040 Main Gore Place #A3/Sundial Townhomes (Phase II).
Applicant: Jeffery Schillman
Planner: Randy Stouder
5. A request for a worksession to discuss the Eagle River Watershed plan.
Planner: Russell Forrest
` ��j
�h
:: � � ' � '
� �, /_
�, ")
F:�everyone\pec�notices\091195 ��^ �
����;?-� � � �
. U
I
� �
��.
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ,�o,�`' ��'
�. `
201 Gore Creek Drive 970 476-2201 '� ��
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX 476-7491 �� ��.`���
�'� Q �►
�� �
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS �
��
Hill Building/ Blanche C. Hill �
One Vail Place 311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Serrano' s Building Margretta Parks
Box 37312 Box 365
Denver, CO 80237 Vail, CO 81658
Town of Vail 111 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Associates Joe Macy, Mountain Planning
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81658
U. S . Forest Service P.O. Box 190
Minturn, CO 81645
Red Lion Building Oscar Tang
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Robert E.M. and Aagje M.T. Nourse
1417 Indian Creek Drive
Fort Worth, TX 76107
Charles Rosenquist
P.O. Box 686
Vail, CO 81658
Richard Brown
1780 South Bellaire
Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Golden Peak House Rosslyn Valentine
278 East Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, CO 81657
Plaza Lodge Ron Byrnes & Associates Management Co.
292 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Attention: Carol Deckard
8/14/95
�
� � o
� Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ������ �� �QQ���O��°� �
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 ��TE g����t� � �oB No po
ATTENTION ^ `
V I�! _
To -�'G'I,-� H m� vt�i I� �N{E-�I U�I�'�� RE
t � ! �� ���--ffi�� �p 1����" , � �
�,�� l.�ldD�o�I� u (;� �
WE ARE SENDING YOU ,� Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
�Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
❑ Shop drawings �Prints �Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
� COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
c� l� � ���f`� � �'� ��-� ���✓�.� N
' ` �— � �"I hl �'"
4 �� �i"` P� � �a ��I-a ��'�-fi�
N� � �r ��-I��� �
���� .
�l�4 � � � �r f�r ���+� �
�/!� �i - � �c I �N r,l �� �--
� '! 48 �t� f��I����� I�"�i`�"t� �I-- �1- �
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
� For your use O Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted rJ Resubmit copies for approval
�For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
� i
,� '
�� � t �enc �
�^,� �
{ ��'�j�. i
����
COPY TO
SIGNED: C� /
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notity us once.
�
� � o
� Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ������ �� �� °� ������Q�
201 Gore Creek Drive 303-476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657 FAX476-7491 �ATE �' � � � �oB No �p0
ATTENTI N t
/
RE
TO � I""I C>�'� V�I I� � U �
1�� �, �I�t--I.'1"��� 12-b, I��,
� � �
'�I U; �l,o �I� �.�,��1E-t�
WE ARE SENDING YOU f�Attached C Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order � ��Y�
❑ Shop drawings �Prints �Plans ❑ Sampies � Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
D � � L ta �� � ' �.G'I.�I.�'"�0 �
��I� ' I r-� ��I NC �r-E��-
� � l4��1 �N��k- �' �( �� �� .�oa o
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
� For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
� For review and comment C7
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS �U �i —
L���� l.-�T I-�I� k-�-.14 W I� `t'ai,l I-I ���b �t-1`�'
t��o I-1'`���--1.- I �-I�r� �TIO� .
'p-I��-►�:
COPY TO -
SIGNED: �i�(�.s .
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at nce.
� - � �(� d - G�- ���� 11�1�� ��l�l-�-�
= rovised 10/5/92 ��" � �
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 5���'�Q '��'
APPLICATION FORM FOR SP�CIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• I . This procedure is required for any project that would go
through the Special Development District procedure .
The application will not be accepted until all information
. is submitted.
(please print or type)
A. . APPLICANT �I�� �f"I�I � '�� (��
MAILING ADDRESrS��i "���i G�'�i�'/�'vI ��Y Pi � �g�� �� ��N
�L�rgU� �OdL � I7�"1�7��i1�� PHONE Z�' �Z�'��G
��°~� �I
��APPLI.CANT� S RE �ENTATI�_�No�Jr�N ��r� �{oPl�lr�s'�-II�(:��
Q a �DRESS_�D�GOP'�iG�il�-� YAlli,l.l�. PHONE GI70� �1�o 'Z�1
� � �IL �
�' PROPERTY OWNER(S) Gr
� �..
� OWNER(S) SIGNATIIRE (S)
.� �o
� "' MAILING ADDRESS U I ���o ��--
�
� �� /�/I�� S��'T�G ,��o �,LI.�1�1'���i"�r PHONE �LI4'� G1L�''�5�11Xv
� ��Z��I - 44'1!
. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
S T RE E T AD D RE S S : �L'18 ,�f-IS� }�ia h-IriN �-b. 1/�•I V, �'. 8)�'1
LOT�BLOCK_�SUBDIVISION_ VAI L UYU,.�' � �I1�1r
E. STAMPED, ADDRESSED ENVELOPES OF THE NAMES OF OWNERS OF
ALL PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND A
LIST OF THEIR NAMES AND MAILING ADDRESSES .
F. A TITLE REPORT TO VERIFY OWNERSHIP AND EASEMENTS .
II . Four (4) copies of the following information must be
submitted:
A. `� Detailed written/graphic description of proposal;
8- An environmental impact report shall be submitted to
the zoning administrator in accordance with Chapter
18 . 56 hereof unless waived by Section 18 . 56 . 030, exempt
projects;
�
e-. An open space and recreational plan sufficient to meet
the demands generated by the development without undue
burden on available or proposed public facilities;
D. Existing contours having contour intervals of not more
than five feet if the average slope of the site is
twenty percent or less, or with contour intervals of
not more than ten feet if the averaqe slo�e of the sir.P
is greater than twenty percent .
E . A proposed site plan, at a scale not smaller than one
inch equals fifty feet, showing the approximate
locations and dimensions of all buildings and
structures, uses therein, and all principal site
development features, such as landscaped areas,
recreational facilities, pedestrian plazas and
walkways, service entries, driveways, and off-street
parking and loading areas with proposed contours after
grading and site development;
. 1
� � � t
F. A preliminary landscape plan, at a scale not smaller ?
than one inch equals fifty feet, showing existing
landscape .features to be retained or removed, and
� showing proposed landscaping and landscaped site
development features, such as outdoor recreational
facilities, bicycle paths, trails, pedestrian plazas
and walkways, water features and other elements;
G. Preliminary building elevations, sections, and floor
plans, at a scale not smaller than one-eighth equals
one foot, in sufficient detail to determine floor area,
gross residential floor area, interior circulation,
locations of uses within buildings, and the general
scale and appearance of the proposed development .
III . TIME REQUIREMENTS
A. The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the
2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. An application with
the necessary accompanying material must be submitted
four weeks prior to the date of the meeting.
B. The developer must begin initial construction of the
special development district within� three years from
the time of its final approval, and continue diligently
toward the completion of the project . If the special
development district is to be developed in phases, the
developer must begin construction of subsequent phases
within one year of the completion of the previous
phase .
NOTE : It is recommended that before a Special
Development District application is submitted, a
pre-application meeting should be set up with a
member of the Department of Community Development .
IV. FEES
Application Fees are as follows :
a. Establishment of SDD : 51, 500 . 00
b. Major Amendments : $1, 000 .00
c . Minor Amendments : S 200 . 00
Application f�e paid: $ 000 Date � ����C'✓ Check #�a�e�
V. A. If this application requires a separate review by any
local, State or Federal agency other than the Town of
Vail, the application fee shall be increased by
$200 . 00 . Examples of such review, may include, but are
not limited to : Colorado Department of Highway Access
Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc .
B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any
publishing fees which are in excess of 50� of the
application fee . If, at the applicant' s request, any
matter is postponed for hearing, causinq the matter to
be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-
publication shall be paid by the applicant .
C. Applications deemed by the Community Development
Department to have significant design, land use or
other issues which may have a significant impact on the
community may require review by consultants other that ,
town staff. Should a determination be made by the town
staff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any application, Community Development may hire an
outside consuatant, it shall estimate the amount of
2
� � r
� ` � �
�
money necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall
be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time
he files his application with the Community Development
Department . Upon completion of the review of the
application by the consultant, any of the funds
forwarded by the applicant for payment of the
• . consultant which have not been paid to the consultant
shall be returned to the applicant . Expenses incurred
by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the
applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant
within 30 days of notification by the Town .
"
�
�
,
3
� .,. . : .
. � �
__--- ----- -_.-- ---- ------ ------- -- - �---- - ---- -... --- ------- --- --- - - ----- ____ —_
-� _ - _
` ,
- 7'OWN OF VAIL �cE�rro. �� -
DEP.U2T11 �T UF CO�IAfU!TT77'DE�'ELOPSSE\?
,�.� f 7� .� � I � _
_ �l �/��� � C % -
ADDRESS_ DATE /�I �'�
_ ^ ��- PRWFC7 ' -
- CHEC}iS!�tADE PAYABLE TO TOK^V OF�'AIL
.LCCOCIT\O. ITEM \O. TAX -: COST SA. TQ'!'AL
� O1 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS A4APS 55.00 *
�, O1 0000 4241� UIv'IFORM BUILDING CODE S54.00 * -
-- 01 OU00 4241� UNIFORi�4 PLi1;�9B1T�G CODE S39.00 *
>: 01 Q000 424]� UNIFOR'�4 MECHANICAL CODE 537.00 *
� O1 OL100 4241� UI�'IFOR1��F1R.E CUDE S36.00 " _
�°- OI 0000 4241� NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE S37.00 *
`' 01 Q000 424]� OTI�ER CODE BOOKS * -
= U1 0000 41�4F BLUE PRINTS (;�1YLARS) �7.00 *
`�' 01 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES S0.25 *
-� O1 (b000 42412 STUDIES *
- O1 0000 42412 7"OVFEES CO,'�iPUTER PROGRAM � S5.00 * -
O1 0�000 42371 PENALTY FEES /RE-II�SPECTIONS
OI Qi100 41332 PLAN REVl}:\�' RE-CHECK FEE S40 PER I�R.
` 01 (�U00 42��2 OFF HOLiRS INSPECTION FFES -
j� O1 U000 41412 ( CONTRr1CTORS LICT'�SES FEES I x�
-- 0} QT000=�1413 SIGN APPLICf1TION FEE S20.00 -
== 01 �t000 41413 ADDITIO\.�1L SIGNAGE FEE [S 1.00 PER SQ.FT.] =
= 01 �000 4�-�40 VTC ART PROIECT DONATION -
- O1 (�{�00 41331 � PRE PAID DL-SIGN RE�'IEVV BOARD FEE
� O1 a�000�?371 INVESTIGATION 3=EE (BUILDING)
� 31 �D�000 4�1 10 TOV PAR_}�J1G FU:�D I I
= 01 �000 ??0?7 TOV NE\�SPAPER DISPENSFR FUND I -
. * O1 �f000 21112 T,L�ABLE �: a°ro (ST.aTE) -
= * OY 0000 41010 T,1.\ABLE (d-4°/a (TO\�'\) I
= 01 �s000��371 IBUILDI�G IN�'L-STIG:'�TION I F
- OT13ER
- EC APPLICATIO\ E
- 01 �1000 41330 ADDITIONAL GRFA "?�0" S200.00 —
� O1 �OU 41330 �CONDITIONAL USL= PER�11T S200.00
� O 1 �OC�4l 330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION LESS 7HAN 100 S .FT. S200.00
-. O1 0�00 41330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION [I�40RF TI�AN 100 SQ.FT. 5500.00
. � O1 �t�000 41"0 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NEW S1,�00.00 -
�: O1 �0 133 SPECIAL DE�'ELOPMFNT DISTRICT 1AJOR AI��END S1,000.00 vL3; =
-� O1 0�00� �� ;SPLCIAL DE�'ELOP?��FNT DISTRICT [?�41T�'OR AT�EhD) S200.00 �
� O] ��00�3I330 �SliBDI\'ISIO\ '
` O1 0�00 41330 VARInNCE S250.00
O1 ad00 413�0 ZONING CODE AMENDf�4ENTS 5250.00
� 01 �00�1330 RE-ZONING S200.00
�.
�- OTHER
OTHL-R
TOTAL:
i:
- co��wE.,-:rs:
= c�sH �— � �K=� �ri.o�� ��.BY:
r � , ,
r � � �
�'� � � � �� ��
being the True Point of Beginning;thence S 79°04'08" E and along the Southerly line of said parcel 200.00
feet to the Southeast corner thereof; thence N 62°52'00" E and along the Northerly line of that parcel of land
described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle Counry Records, a distance of 66.78
feet to the Northeasterty comer of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly right-of-way line of
Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27°13'37"W a distance of 77.37 feet
along said Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road;thence N 89°29'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to
the Northeasterly corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Paye 139 as recorded January 10,
1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records;thence Northwasterly 26.51 feet along
the arc of a 37.50 feet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40°30'00" whose chord bears N
53°40'00" W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 73°55'00" W and along said tangent
166.44 feet;thence N 85°10'21" W a distance of 50.40 feet to the Northwesterly corner of the Mounta'sn
Haus Parcel;thence S 02�18'00"W and along the easterly line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distarce of
100.00 feet to the Southeasterly comer thereof;thence S 45°13'S3" E a distance of 38.70 feet to the True
Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet, more or less.
Applicant: Vail Athletic Club
Planner: Shelly Mello TABLED TO JULY 26, 1993
Diana Donovan made a motion to table this item until July 26, 1993 with Jeff Bowen
seconding this motion. A 4-0 vote tabled this request until July 26, 1993.
3. A request for a major exterior alteration in CCI, for an addition and exterior upgrades to
the Cyranos Building, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village
1 st Filing.
Applicant: Margretta B. Pa�ks
Planners: Mike Mollica and Tim Devlin TABLED TO AUGUST 9, 1993
Diana Donovan made a motion to table this item until August 9, 1993 with Jeff Bowen
seconding this motion. A 4-0 vote tabled this request until August 9, 1993.
4. A request to review the Management Plan and Master Plan for the Vail Cemetery to be
located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located west of the Glen Lyon
subdivision and southeast of the Mattefiom neighborhood.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED INDEFINITELY
Diana Donovan made a motion to table this item indefinitely with Jeff Bowen seconding
this motion. A 4-0 vote tabled this request indefinitely.
5. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District,
a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planners: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin TABLED INDEFINITELY
Planning and Environmental Commission
July 12, 1993 2
� , , • .
+ � �
Diana Donovan made a motion to table this item indefinitely with Jeff Bowen seconding
this motion. A 4-0 vote tabled this request indefinitely.
6. A request for proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and Natural
Open Space District, and Chapter 18.32 Agricultural and Open Space District, of the
Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest WITHDRAWN
7. A request for a minor subdivision and rezoning from Greenbelt Natural Open Space to
Hillside Residential for Tract C, Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision.
Applicant: SBC Development Corporation
Planner: Mike Mollica/Jim Curnutte WITHDRAWN
8. Approve minutes from June 28, 1993 PEC meeting.
Diana Donovan made a motion to approve the minutes with Jeff Bowen seconding the
motion. A 4-0 vote approved the minutes from the June 28, 1993 PEC meeting.
9. Council update:
•Summary of enforcement meeting
Kristan Pritz stated that she would do a write-up summarizing the Town Council
enforcement meeting. She said that Council wants the Town of Vail to be stricter with
people who repeatedly violate the zoning and building regulations. She stated that
Council would like to see the dollar amount for fines increased as well.
•A & D Building conditional use appeal
Kristan Pritz stated that Vail Associates, Inc., the applicant for this request, may
request to relocate the dwelling unit somewhere off-site.
•Simba Run SDD
Kristan Pritz stated that the Simba Run SDD (Savoy Villas) would be coming back to
the PEC because the Simba Run Condominium Association, which is an adjacent
property owner to the current Simba Run SDD project, was not listed by the applicant
as a parry to be notified.
•Revocable right-of-way process
Kristan Pritz stated that this item was tabled at the July 6, 1993 Town Council meeting.
Planning and Environmental Commission
July 12, 1993 3
, ' •
. .• -. , �+j
V
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Pianning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on May 24, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for a work session�for the establishment of a Special Development District,
a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
. C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing. �
�
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Lfd./Margaritaville, Inc. "
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
2. A request to amend Section 18.04.170 of the Zoning Code to clarify the definition of
the height of structures.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Shelly Mello
3. A request to amend Section 18.58.020 of the Zoning Code to clarify the height allowed
for retaining walls in setbacks.
Applicant: Town of Vail
� - Planner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck located at
122 E. Meadow Drive, Village Center Commercial Building/A part of Lot K, Block 5E,
Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Fred Hibbard
Planner: Shelly Mello
5. A request for a setback variance to allow an addition to Unit 3-A, Vail Trails ChaleUa
portion of Block 4, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: W. Patrick Grahm
Planner: � Jim Curnutte
6. A request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 12 inch high
pressure natural gas pipeline generally located befinreen Dowd Junction and the Vail
Associates Shops.
1
�� ' w •- • • •
Applicant: Town of Vail
Pianner: Jim Curnutte
14. An appeal of a staff decision regarding GRFA for a covered entryway to be constructed
as part of a residence located at Lot 1, Distelhorst Subdivision/4582 Streamside Circle
East.
Appellant: Kyle Webb
Planner: Jim Curnutte
15. A one hour discussion of appointment of a PEC chairperson before project orientation.
16. A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
��
That part of the First Supplemental Map for Simba Run Condominium, according to the map thereof
recorded in the office oi the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning at the most south�vesterly corner oi said map, thence the tollowing three courses along the
westerly lines of said map; 1) NO3°33'01"E 160.79 feet;2) N12`50'33"E 144.72 feet;3} N17°56'03" 70.60
feet;thence, departing said westerly Iine, S13°16'03"W 157.26 feet, thence S76°43'S7"E 91.50 teet;thence
N13°16'03"E 35.00 feet;thence S76°43'S7"E 72.31 teet to the easterly line ot said map;thence the following
two courses along the easterly and southeasterly lines oi said map; 1) S24°44'57"E 52.38 feet;2)
S52°50'29"W 272.50 feet lo the Point of Beginning, containing 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
That part of Simba Run, according to the map thereof, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in the Oftice of
the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as tollows:
Beginning at the most southerly corner oi said Simba Run, thence the tollowing tour courses along the
southwesterly and northwesterly Iines of said Simba Run; 1) N37°09'31"W 233.28 teet; 2) 334.57 feet along
the arc ot a curve to the left, having a radius of 1771.95 feet, a central angle of 10°49'06", and a chord that
bears N42°13'20"E 334.07 feet; 3) N36°48'48" E 201.36 feet; 4) 15.96 teet along the arc ot a curve to the
right, having a radius oi 428.02 feet, a central angle oi 02°08'12", and a chord that bears N37°52'54" E
15.96 feet to a corner on the westerly boundary of the Frst Supplemental Map for Simba Run
Condominium, according to the map thereof recorded in the oitice of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and
Recorder;thence the following tour courses along said westerly boundary; 1} S21°51'28"W 69.90 feet; 2)
S17°56'03"W 181.17 teet; 3) S12°50'33"W 144.72 teel;4) S03°33'01"W 160.79 teet to the southeasterly line
oi said Simba Run;thence, along said southeasterly line, S52°50'29"W 113.08 teet to the Point oi
Beginning, containing 1.560 acres, more or less.
Applicant: Simba Land Corporation/Walid Said
Planner: Mike Mollica
17. A request for a conditional use permit, a paving variance to allow for a gravel access
road and the cemetery master plan and management plan for the proposed design of
the Vail Cemetery to be located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located
west of the Glen Lyon subdivision and southeast of the Matterhorn neighborhood.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3
C����,N.�., �'��°� �--� �� �-� ,
�
. �
Oscar Tang Charles Rosenquist Richard Brown
100 Park Avenue P.O. Box 686 1780 South Bellaire
New York, NY 10017 Vail, CO 81657 Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Jon Shirley Rich Phelps Margretta Parks
2019 Evergreen Point U.S. Forest Service P.O. Box 37312
Medina, WA 98039 P.O. Box 190 Denver, CO 80237
Minturn, CO 81645
Vail Associates, Inc. Blanche C. Hill Town of Vail
Attn: Joe Macy 311 Bridge Street 75 South Frontage Road
P.O. Box 7 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657
Vail, CO 81657
Robert and Dian4e Lazier Edwin Whitehead Kindelco, Inc.
P.O. Box 627 15 Valley Drive c/o Christiania Lodge
Vail, CO 81658 Greenwich, CT 06830 356 E. Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, CO 81657
Jerome and Martha Lewis Howard P. and Judith Berkowitz E.B. Chester
410 17th Street, Suite 1600 888 7th Avenue 395 Mill Creek Circle
Denver, CO 80202 New York, NY 10106 Vail, CO 81657
K.H. Chester Maurice O. Rinehardt Linda J. Craddock
P.O. Box 8243 P.O. Box 5397 P.O. Box 2929
Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Lighthouse Point, FL 33074 Colorado Springs, CO 80901-2929
Barbara M. Osborne Jay A. Precourt W. Grant Williams
c/o Keith S. Jennings 1560 Broadway, Suite 2000 #2 Ladue Lane
1531 Walnut Street Denver, CO 80202 St. Louis, MO 631214
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Jim Lamont Paul C. Wolf Jeff Selby
P.O. Box 73 505 South Flagler Drive 535 16th Street, #600
Redcliff, CO 81649 1 1 th Floor Denver, CO 80202
West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3475
���� q�- ��:�r� �u(-�- c�- C�� �
��
. _ . .._. . : .. _ .
. ��� � A � A �
� � ��� �
the applicant add 5 to 7 evergreen trees in order to screen the waii from view.
Bill Anderson stated that he preferred a stone veneer wall to stucco on the proposed
retaining wall.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she aiso preferred a stone veneer retaining wall.
Dalton Williams concurred with Bill and Kathy and added that he would like to see the
height of the wall cut back, if possible.
Greg Amsden stated that he had no problems with this request.
Diana Donovan inquired how the board could guarantee that the driveway is built to
what it is approved at.
rr
Kristan Pritz stated that the Community Development and P�blic Works Departments
would implement checks as part of the building permit process.
Kathy Langenwalter made a motion to approve this request for wall height variances
per the staff inemo with the additional condition that the lower retaining wall be
veneered with stone to match the building. Greg Amsden seconded this motion and a
5-0 unanimous vote approved this request.
11. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin TABLED TO MAY 24, 1993
Kathy Langenwalter made a motion to table this request until May 24, 1993 with Greg
Amsden seconding this motion. A 5-0 vote tabled this item until May 24, 1993.
12. A request for a work session for a minor subdivision to vacate the lot line between Lots
A-1 and A-2, a request for a variance from the subdivision road standards, and
variance from the wall height standards at Lions Ridge Subdivision/1139 and 1109
Sandstone Drive.
Applicant: Michael LauterbachlThe Reinforced Earth Co.
Planner: Shelly Mello TABLED TO APRIL 26, 1993
Kathy Langenwalter made a motion to table this request until April 26, 1993 with Bill
Anderson seconding this motion. A 5-0 bote tabled this item until April 26, 1993.
13. Approve minutes from March 22, 1993 PEC Meeting.
Planning and Environmental Commission
April 12, 1993 �3
� "�
� �
Oscar Tang Charles Rosenquist Richard Brown
100 Park Avenue P.O. Box 686 1780 South Bellaire
New York, NY 10017 Vail, CO 81657 Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Jon Shirley Rich Phelps Margretta Parks
2019 Evergreen Point U.S. Forest Service P.O. Box 37312
Medina, WA 98039 P.O. Box 190 Denver, CO 80237
Minturn, CO 81645
Vail Associates, Inc. Blanche C. Hill Town of Vail
Attn: Joe Macy 311 Bridge Street 75 South Frontage Road
P.O. Box 7 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657
Vail, CO 81657
Robert and Dian4e Lazier Edwin Whitehead Kindelco, Inc.
P.O. Box 627 15 Valley Drive c/o Christiania Lodge
Vail, CO 81658 Greenwich, CT 06830 356 E. Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, CO 81657
Jerome and Martha Lewis Howard P. and Judith Berkowitz E.B. Chester
410 17th Street, Suite 1600 888 7th Avenue 395 Mill Creek Circle
Denver, CO 80202 New York, NY 10106 Vail, CO 81657
K.H. Chester Maurice O. Rinehardt Linda J. Craddock
P.O. Box 8243 P.O. Box 5397 P.O. Box 2929
Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Lighthouse Point, FL 33074 Colorado Springs, CO 80901-2929
Barbara M. Osborne Jay A. Precourt W. Grant Williams
c/o Keith S. Jennings 1560 Broadway, Suite 2000 #2 Ladue Lane
1531 Walnut Street Denver, CO 80202 St. Louis, MO 631214
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Jim Lamont Paul C. Wolf Jeff Selby
P.O. Box 73 505 South Flagler Drive 535 16th Street, #600
Redcliff, CO 81649 11 th Floor Denver, CO 80202
West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3475
� � � � _,��
< � � �. ���' �
�' � � S �.� �r
�
�
�
��J
�:�►
� � •�
. �
Os�ar 'i''ang � Kindelco, Inc. �-�
� 100 ,P�rk Avenue �rc/o Christiania Lodge � �
New York, NY 10017 356 E. Hanson Ranch Road ;
� Vail, CO 81657
� Charles Rosenquis _ _ _ - _ =-'."�=���
P.O. Box 686 Jerome & Martha Lewis
; Vail, CO 81657 J \' 410 17th Street � : __ __ _ - _ _
Suite 1600 - - - _.
� Denver, CO 80202 .
> '
V Richard Brown -
1780 South Bellair '�1 � Howard P. and Judith Berkowit V
Suite 106 ��/ J 888 7th Avenue
Denver, CO 80222 J New York, NY 10106
Jon Shirl ey - ,i 1--�--�-------- ,
v 2019 Evergreen Poin F�--�� -�;
Medina, WA 98039 E.B. Chester �
j� 395 Mill Creek Circle -
j Vail, CO 81657
U. S. Forest Service ! K.H. Chester
,�P.O. Box 190 � �� � p,0. Box 8243 �
Minturn, CO 81645 Rocky Mount, NC 2780ai
,�
�
��_-_
_._ -- ----- ----..._-
Margretta Parks J Maurice O. Rinehardt „�
� P.O. Box 37312 �� �► P.O. Box 5397
Denver, CO 80237 Lighthouse Point, FL 33074
Vail Associates, Inc• � Linda J. Craddock //
Joe Macy /,,'} Box 2929 �'
�Box 7 � l.OiOlauO Si�iiiay�� �� o�ol�l_?029
Vail, CO 81657 V
Blanche C. Hill � Barbara M. Osborne
v311 Bridge Stree c/o Keith S. Jennings �/
Vail, CO 81657 1531 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Town of Vail �, Jay A. Precourt
�75 South. Frontage Roa� 1560 Broadway � �,�,,;, ���
Vail, CO 81657 Suite 2000
Denver, CO 80202
Robert and Diane Lazier
� Box 627 / � W. Grant Williams �
, Vail, CO 81658 �V�✓ #2 Ladue Lane V
�
St. Louis MO �I��� �
� 63124 �
�Edwin Whitehead �y> • ���
15 Valley Drive v �
Greenwich, CT 06830 � �
� , � �
" THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on April 12, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Nail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica�im Devlin TABLED TO MAY 24, 1993
2. A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge to allow the construction of
a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595
East Vail Valley Drive.
Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for the development of
single family homes located on Tracts A and B, The Valley, Phase II/1480 Buffer Creek
Rd.
Applicant: Steve Gensler/Parkwood Realty
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for the construction of an
addition and a garage located at 2409 Chamonix Road/Lot 19, Block A, Vail das
- Schone Filing No. 1.
i'
� Applicant: Anneliese Taylor
Planner: Shelly Mello
;� .
= 5. A request for a conditional use permit to allow the expansion of the Dobson Ice Arena,
; located at 321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 5, Block 1. Vail/Lionshead 2nd Filing.
�
� Applicant: Vail Recreation District .
Planner: Tim Devlin
�
r.
S:�
C
p; �; Kindelco, Inc.
� �Q� �'arknAvenue ��,�,-' � �/o Christiania Lodge ,f
10017 356 E. Hanson Ranch Road�
New York, NY � Vail, CO 81657
� Charles Rosenquis , Jerome & Martha Lewis � � �
; P.O. Box 686 � � 410 17th Street `� -
Vail, CO 81657 Suite 1600 �� - - - -- �- � --
� Denver, CO 80202 _
:�
� Richard Brown - --
,�' �
1780 South Bellair � Howard P. and Judith Berkowit�, l/ �
Suite 106 � 888 7th Avenue �
Denver, CO 80222 New York, NY 10106
� ,7on Shirley - ,i _ _
2019 Evergreen Poin
Medina, WA 98039 E.B. Chester
� 395 Mill Creek Circle -
Vail, CO 81657
U.S. Forest Service,�-:, K.H. Chester
�P.O. Box 190 ( ✓ ' V
�=- P.O. Box 8243
Minturn, CO 81645 Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Margretta Parks �` ✓ . �
� Maurice O. Rinehardt
� P.O. Box 37312 �,.-� 'v P.O. Box 5397 ` _.
Denver, CO 80237 Lighthouse Point, FL 33074
Vail Associates, Inc . � Linda J. Craddock �/
� Joe Macy � �
� j Box 2929 ""�
BOX 7 � - J �--• ----� �n ono � �o
�-% l.Oluldu0 J�Liiiy�� ..v .....��-�.�2
Vail, CO 81657
Blanche C. Hill v Barbara M. Osborne
�"311 Bridge Stree ' c/o Keith S. Jennings C,:�
Vail, CO 81657 - 1531 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Town of Vail \, Jay A. Precourt �`"�
�75 South Frontage Roa. �` � 1560 Broadway � �" ; �,�,;,, ���
Vail, CO 81657 �" Suite 2000
Denver, CO 80202
� Robert and Diane Lazier
Box 627 .�, �, W. Grant Williams �; �
Vail, CO 81658 � v,/�✓ #2 Ladue Lane ', ��`
St. Louis, MO 63124
�Edwin Whitehead �
15 Valley Drive
Greenwich, CT 06830
.
� ~ �
�
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on October 26, 1992, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for a joint work session with the Planning and Environmental Commission
and the Design Review Board to discuss the establishment of a Special Development
Gistr��t, a CCI extericr altera►i;,n, a mi�cr s�v.�.��Vis:on, a zone change and amendments
to View Corridors No. 1 and No. 2; for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch
-�,
Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Gold Peak House Condominium AssociationNail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
2. A request to amend Section 18.38, and Section 18.32 of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code, regarding uses in open space zone districts.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte
3. A request to amend Sections 18.58.320 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code to increase
the number of allowed satellite dishes on commercial properties.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a conditional use permit for an addition to the Municipal Building to house
the Vail Police Department, located at 75 South Frontage Road West (at the east end
of the existing Municipal Building), and as legally described below:
A part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meri�an,
County of Eagle,State of Colorado,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast
corner of said Section 6,thence North 00 degrees 28 minutes 16 seconds West and along the East line of
said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 72.75 the East line of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 72.75 feet to
a point,said point being 110.00 feet northeasterly from the southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No.6
as measured at right angles thereto;thence North 79 degrees 46 minutes 11 secands West and along a line
parallel to said southerty right-of-way line 145.50 feet to The True Point of Beginning;thence North 16
degrees 08 minutes 47 seconds East 78.00 feet;thence North 68 degrees 08 minutes 35 seconds West
428.70 feet;thence North 66 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds West 152.57 feet;thence South 27 degrees 42
minutes 40 seconds West 192.66 feet;thence South 52 degrees 48 minutes 50 seconds East 36.32 feet to a
point,said point being 110.00 feet northeast from said South right-0f-way line of U.S. Highway No.6 as
measured at right angles thereto;thence South 79 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds East and along a line
parallel to said South right of way line 585.56 feet to The True Point of Beginning.
Except that portion conveyed t��$oard of County Commissioners of Eagle County,and the Department of
Highways,State of Colorado by`tule-and order recorded January 5, 1971 in Book 219 at Page 441.
-.�=--
Applicant: Town of tfaiL�_-�- =_. �---� <_ - _ -- _ _
Planner: Mike Motli�a'_ -
-=-_��_ =-:�_-�__ _ �_;� -_
__---=�--� -�__ _ _� Q
-- __ �� C�
C70� /� �� ( p, w/ ",y'�� W ' � .2/'��5z3-37c6
�lL�I� � ' iti����/�
�' ---
J r �� [ v � " l- _ — ___�__._.._ . ---�'?^_'__C _._%Ar�'�"`^__11Y�----L���---iL�%^r�--����—
_--
. � a/
—----�-- . ._. ___ _ . ---___ — -------- - ------ — ---- ___---- —
� ��,.�,_� _ m-`—-� 2 —
N��1__s��e'`""3 �j-�-� -I ��._ - -- - -
�r
- - �
_ ---- _-��c�u�- - 14�___.�.__�—�____ _ _ _ __ __ __---- - --- ---
G�-- --
_ _ _ _ -- _ _ -__ — ---- - —_ _ __ _--
__ _---- -
,cti� �e
'_��C--��,�az�._ _ ��A J ':-.� � O� �__ -a��Q .,��_.%�°.___ Z_ a--�
, .
---- --- --- _ _ .- ---__�� �<r-�.�,�.o,�__ -- - - � -�'-Q----� _
_��
__ __ ____ __ _�----- - � - -- - -�- . _ ----__ --__- _ -_ __ __---- __-------------
�i --
� �
_ �
M��
�y
TOWN OF VAIL �
7S South Frontage Road Department of Community Development
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138 /479-2139
February 25, 1993
Mr. Clark Willingham
GPH, Ltd.
One Turtle Creek Viliage, Suite 606
Dallas, TX 75219-4471
RE: The Golden Peak House redevelopment
Dear Clark:
As you are aware, the Planning and Environmental Commission on January 25, 1993
unanimously approved your request to table the Golden Peak House redevelopment until their
meeting on April 12, 1993. It is my understanding that this tabling will enable you to tie up
some "loose ends" regarding the Tract E covenants and the rezoning issues. Hopefully,
further discussions regarding the potential Cyrano's redevelopment can also occur during this
delay.
In order to proceed to the April 12, 1993 PEC hearing, it will be necessary to have a complete
application package submitted to the Town no later than March 15, 1993. This four week
period will allow the staff ample time to do a complete anatysis and review of the project.
As we have previously discussed, due to the extent of this project, and due to the current
delay, the staff would recommend at least one additional work session with the PEC prior to a
final hearing.
We look forward to working with you on this project, and remain available to meet with you at
your convenience.
Sincerely,
/� /"(�-�
Mike Mollica
Assistant Director of Planning
cc: Craig Snowden
Kristan Pritz
Tim Devlin
_ � � � �
- F!L E COPY
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
JANUARY 25, 1993
MINUTES
PRESENT STAFF
Diana Donovan Kristan Pritz
Chuck Crist Mike Moilica
Dalton Williams Sheily Mello
Jeff Bowen Tim Devlin
Greg Amsden Andy Knudtsen
Gena Whitten Jim Curnutte
Kathy Langenwalter Russell Forrest
1. The Planning and Environmental Commission was calied to order at 2:00 p.m. to
discuss an update for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI
exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to View
Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A,B,C, Block
2, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 12, 1993
Clark Willingham requested that this item be tabled until March or April of this year so
that he could tie up loose ends concerning covenants, zoning, etc. He also stated that
he wanted to wait and see what happens with the possible redevelopment of Cyrano's.
A general discussion was then held concerning looking at both the Golden Peak House
and the Cyrano's projects together.
Planning and Environmental Commission
January 25, 1993
� `' � � •
Dalton Wiliiams thought that this made sense, to look at the whole area and then
establish general guidelines concerning property lines, setbacks. easements and
variances.
Chuck Crist inquired about whether it was possible to have an SDD with different
owners.
Kristan Pritz responded that it is possible but all the pieces must fit together (i.e.
Cascade Village). She suggested that a work session regarding the Golden Peak
House and Cyrano's would be wise prior to a final hearing.
Clark Willingham stated that the Golden Peak House and Cyrano's need to be
organized and constructed as one project with regard to Town disruption.
Greg Amsden stated that he was in favor of a postponement in order to get the
specifics concerning the Golden Peak House worked out.
Jeff Bowen motioned to table this discussion. A unanimous vote of 7-0 tabled this
request until April 12, 1993.
2. A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge, to allow the construction of
a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595
Vail Valley Drive.
Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
TABLED UNTIL FEBRUARY 8, 1993
Dalton Williams moved to table this request with Chuck Crist seconding the motion. A
unanimous vote of 7-0 tabled this request until February 8, 1993.
3. A request for a work session for a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village Area
A, Millrace III, to amend the approved development plan to allow for one single family
residence and one duplex located at 1335 Westhaven Drive, more specifically
described as follows:
A par�of the SW%.,NE'/+,Section 12,Township 5 South,Range 81 West of the 6th P.M.,described as fotlows:
Beginning at a point of the Nonh-South centerline of said Sec±ion 12 whence an iron pin wiih a plastic cap marking the center of said
Section 12 bears S00°38'S6'W 455.06 Teet;thence along said centerline N00°38'56"E 122.81 teet to Ihe southerly ROW line of I-70;
thence departing said ROW line N66°53'25"E 39.15 feet;thence departing said ROW line S87°23'19"E 165.42 feet to a point of
curve;thence 122.83 feet along the arc of a 1a3.20 toot radius curve to the lefl,having a central angle of a9°08'S1'and a chord that
bears S15°57'45"E 119.10 feet;thence S40°32'10"E 3.00 feet;thence 66.30 feet along the arc of a 77.21 toot radius curve to the
right,having a central angle of 49°12'10'and a chord that bears S15°56'OS"E 6428 fest;thence SS°40'00"W 90.27 teet;thence
N38°42'24"W 224.55 feet;thence S78°10'32"W 101.44 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Applicant: MECM Enterprises, Inc. represented by Michael Lauterbach
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Planning and Environmental Commission
January 25, 1993 2
� �
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
JANUARY 25, 1993
AGENDA
Project Orientation at Community Development Office 1:00-1:20 PM
Site Visits 1:20-2:00 PM
Public Hearing 2:00 PM
Site Visits 1:20 PM
1335 Westhaven Drive �� �g�
, �Z �. �
Two Saabs - Kristan and Jim are drivers �,�,�"�
f�,� ��o��H
Public Hearinq 2:00 PM ��'��" p�,;,,� '� .5{.
� r� 2 N� : �r� 7--o
vo+e�
1. An update on the Golden Peak House with Clark Willingham to table the request for
the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor
subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden
Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
2. A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge, to allow the construction of
a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595
Vail Valley Drive.
Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge TABLED TO FEBRUARY 8, 1993
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a work session for a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village Area
A, Millrace III, to amend the approved development plan to allow for one single family
residence and one duplex located at 1335 Westhaven Drive, more specifically
described as follows:
A part of the SW'/.,NE'h,Section 12,Township 5 South,Range 81 West of the sth P.M.,described es follows:
Beginning at a point of the North-South centerline of said Section 12 whence an iron pin wiih a plas6c cap marking the center ot sald
Section 12 bears S00°38'S6'W 455.06 feet;thence along said centerline N00°38'S6'E 122.81 feet to the southerly ROW line of 1-70;
thence depaning said ROW Iine N66°53'25'E 39.15 feet;thence Ceparting said ROW li�e S81°23't�E 165.42 feet to a point of
curve;thence 122.83 feet atong the arc of a 143.20 foot radius curve to the le�,having a central angle of 49°OS'51'and a chord that
bears S15°57'45'E 119.10 iset;thence S40°32'10'E 3.00 feet;thence 66.30 tee[along the arc of a 77.21 foot radius curve W the
right,having a cenvat angle of 49°12'10"and a chord tha�bears S15°56'OS"E 64.28 feet;thence S8°40'00'W 90.27 feet;thence
N38°42'24"W 224.55 Teet;thence S78°10'32'W 101.44 fest to the Point of Beginning.
Applicant: MECM Enterprises, Inc. represented by Michael Lauterbach
Planner: Jim Curnutte
. _
_ , - . . ;s , _ _� _ :; : _ _
: _ ,
: _ . . , _.. _{ , . .
� �
4. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.24 Commercial Core i and Chapter
18.26 Commercial Core II of the Town of Vail Zoning Code (relating to exterior
alterations).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Shelly Mello
5. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.32 and Chapter 18.38 of the Vail
Municipal Code relating to uses allowed in open space zone districts.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte WITHDRAWN
6. Explanation of public notice by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - a request for a
Section 404 permit (discharge of fill material) for the proposed nine-hole, par 3 golf
course, located between I-70 and Bald Mountain Road.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District
Planner: Mike Mollica/Russ Forrest
7. Approval of the minutes for the January 11, 1993 PEC meeting.
8. Other business:
. discussion of recently passed term limitation ordinance
. disucssion of Cascade Village/Waterford SDD
. discussion update on February 8th speaker and luncheon on Sustainable
Communities, Daniel Chiras: Guest Speaker.
. discussion of request to appoint chair and vice-chair persons for 1993.
9. A reminder to the PEC regarding the DRB representatives.
PEC representatives to DRB - 1993 Schedule
Jan. - March 1993 Kathy Langenwalter
Diana Donovan (alternate)
April - June 1993 Dalton Williams
Diana Donovan (alternate)
July - Sept. 1993 Jeff Bowen
Diana Donovan (alternate)
Oct. - Dec. 1993 Greg Amsden
Diana Donovan (alternate)
Chuck Crist will serve as second alternate for Diana Donovan.
-� . :. ;.� > .: - - -
_ _ , ;._< _
�ARTNERS, LTD�'� JAN � 9 1�4�
278 Hanson Ranch Road One Turtle Creek Village, Suite 606
Vail, Colorado 81657 Dallas, Texas 75219-4471
303 476-5667• FAX 303-476-0470 214 523-3706• FAX 214 523-3929
7anuary 13, 1993
Ms. Kristan Pritz
Director of Planning
Town of Vail
i�epartment oi i:ommuniry rianning
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Kristan:
Due to several unforseen events I would request that the Town of Vail Planning
Commission table our project to redevelop the Golden Peak House. The project is not dead —
merely delayed.
It has become impossible to obtain signed contracts from Vail Associates, Inc. for the
needed land exchange, as well as the necessary protective covenant, easement and zoning
amendments in a timely manner. Additionally, the dramatic size reductions have eliminated any
financial cushion and there is insufficient time available to obtain firm cost numbers. The
economic risk is simply to great to proceed with construction this spring.
Delaying construction one year, however, has its positive points. In addition to obtaining
the signed agreements and a better cost analysis, I hope the Cyranos project can be done at the
same dme. Whether it is incorporated as a part of our SDD or is simply "the project next
door', the entire Village benefits from a single construction project instead of two successive
summers ot disrupuon.
I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of you, your staff and the Planning Commission
to date. Those efforts have not been wasted. Redevelopment of the Golden Peak House is of
critical importance to Vail and needs to happen -- we need the extra time to do it right.
Yours very truly,
, �
' , /� :��.
Clark S. Willingham
CSW/mm
cc: Ron Riley
Craig Snowdon
o �►
,
�
A A
• • � �
DC� � C� �
PL�,NNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION r�.
JANUARY 25, 1993
AGENDA �"I�
�
II
Project Orientation at Community Development Office 1 :00-1:20 PM
Site Visits 1:20-2:00 PM
Public Hearing 2:00 PM
Site Visits 1:20 PM
1335 Westhaven Drive
Two Saabs - Kristan and Jim are drivers
Public Hearinq-"-� 2:00 PM
1. An up-date on the Golden Peak House with Clark Willingham to table indefinitely the
request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior
alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to View Corridor
No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail
Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
2. A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge, to allow the construction of
a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595
Vail Valley Drive.
Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village Area A, Millrace III, to
amend the approved development plan to allow for one single family residence and
one duplex located at 1335 Westhaven Drive, more specifically described as follows:
A part of the SW Ya, NE '/4, Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of
the 6th P.M., described as follows:
r
� �
� � .
Beginning at a point of the North-South centerline of said Section 12
whence an iron pin with a plastic cap marking the center of said Section
12 bears S00°38'56"W 455.06 feet; thence along said centerline
N00°38'S6"E 122.81 feet to the southerly ROW line of I-70; thence
departing said ROW line N66°53'25"E 39.15 feet; thence departing said
ROW line S81°23'19"E 165.42 feet to a point of curve; thence 122.83
feet along the arc of a 143.20 foot radius curve to the left, having a
central angle of 49°08'51" and a chord that bears S15°57'45"E 119.10
feet; thence S40°32'10"E 3.00 feet; thence 66.30 feet along the arc of a
77.21 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 49°12'10"
and a chord that bears S15°56'05"E 64.28 feet; thence S8°40'00"W
90.27 feet; thence N38°42'24"W 224.55 feet; thence S78°10'32"W
101.44 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Applicant: MECM Enterprises, Inc. represented by Michael Lauterbach
Planner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.24 Commercial Core I and Chapter
18.26 Commercial Core II of the Town of Vail Zoning Code (relating to exterior
alterations).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Shelly Mello
5. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.32 and Chapter 18.38 of the Vail
Municipal Code relating to uses allowed in open space zone districts.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte
WITHDRAWN
6. PEC representatives to DRB - 1993 Schedule
Jan. - March 1993 Kathy Langenwalter
Diana Donovan (alternate)
April - June 1993 Dalton Williams
� Diana Donovan (alternate)
July - Sept. 1993 Jeff Bowen
Diana Donovan (alternate)
Oct. - Dec. 1993 Greg Amsden
Diana Donovan (alternate)
Chuck Crist will serve as second alternate for Diana Donovan.
7. Approval of minutes to the January 11, 1993 PEC meeting.
, .
� TI�oma Pritzker ' ,
', Glive C. [,ratson �„ � �
' IBM Corporation Mad on Plaza
Old� Orchard Road , �On �
Armonk, NY 10504 �
_ _ - _ __
Sam and Nancy Gary Thomas Pritzker
370 17th Street Madison,Plaza �
Suite 5300 200 West Madison �
Denver, CO 80202 . --� Chicago, IL 60606
Pepi Gramshammer JRH-1 '�rust
231 East Gore Drive 4600 South Pionroe Lane
Vail, CO 81657 Engleti�ood, C0 80110
Mill Creek Court Condo - - - - - - -- :- - -
C/0 Slifer Pianagement C0.
143 E. -Aieadow Drive,
Vail, CO 81657
George Washington Knox _ _- -- -_ _ _ _ _._._ _
291 Bridge Street ',
Vail, CO 81657 '
One Vail Place Condo Assoc. �.. _
C/0 Blanche Hill
_ _ ,. _ . ..
311 Bridge Street
Vail, .CO 81657 , �
I _ ..
Gorsuch, Ltd.
, _ _ _ _ _ A - - --. --_ .___..
John McBride ,_ :.: . ._... _ . ,...
263 East Gore Creek Dr. , � - -= �
Vail, !CO 81657 ' -- . _-_ -. -
.
. �� -p ':.. q . . .
. .. ..- � . .. +--: .:. -. _ _
. -..•
. ..- . . .�. _._ _ -:, '�.
, ,.,.
,.. . . .' .. ....�� . . . ..: � �.�_ ' . . ' . . .'. ".�'. . . _ .
. _. . . - . - .. � . . - . . . - - �� .
Anthony &,Constance Ridder ._: . t} �=: ��, "a �=`s. �� �=' .f .;`: . . ,�: :� , � :_ ,-- _ --_
1801 k'est 27th Street =. .., ,� _ . , .. _ . = _ -, : _ . •
Sunset-�Isiand . ' - - .
, 3
� � •
Iiiami, FL 33140 -. '
� . . _.. . .. ' _ _ _ . . _ I - _ ��.4 -
. . � .. . . � .- � . � - . _ �. '
k'alter Patrick Gramm - r ` --- -- - - - - - _ - -
695 Prospect Street . _ - _
Winetka, IL 60093 - . . . . .. .... . - - , - - , =
, �, � -
�' � . -
__ - '. 1 " � ' 2 1 -. t l t_.i t.__• � t .,.l� _tt -' ' _
,s'�, ..=� L��i`*� „r�_ �j �.:f,� _ _' f,. t-� t �.,.-..F .�'>;�i-3 - "
. . . _.. . . , . .. .. ... ._ ' ' _ _ ' _ __
Stuart Colton ,; -_ . _ - . .
., _,. ,- . ;._ . . _ ,
__. .. . . .,_ _. _ _. .: . - - - -
.- � .. i . ��.�. .�r.: '� 4 F "� - .
- 232�Hartshorn Drive. . . : ., _ :�--.�.._ =- . _ ..� ..-_ .� .. ;'.t _ _
, .._ . _. . ., - _ -
- Shorthills,-�: NJ-�: 07.078 � - ^. - k " -` - -
.�� •� ��� . ..._.. . _. ^,., . '...� �.�1i�: �-.� F�°�
. _. ._.._:. . .. :. ....�., "_'._:.... , ._._. __. .� ..___:: '_.'__-". .�.�
. ._ .. __ . . .: , _ ' '
..-- - ..;� _
.�.. .. ._ .. .� .. _ . .-, _ _ "
- _ .
. .. �. �_ . . . . ..� " . . -r. _ �..': , �:.�:�� '-�-.�.. - _ _ _ '— _ _ _
. ._. . _ '.._ ,. .;. __
Thom P.ritzker . , _ _ .
Madis Pl , � -:: _ - - -- -
l r
Linda Craddock - �, Wall Street Building Assoc.
, Box 2929 � 386 Hanson Ranch ROad
Vail, CO 81657 �,
Colorado Springs, CO 80901 �
, �
. i
Howard Berkowitz Plaza Lodge Assoc. _
888 7th Ave. PO Box 68
: New York, NY 10106 Vail, CO 81658 � -
� , =- ---
, _ _ - ---=--- - -=
Hill Building _. _
Jerome Lewis ' 311 Bridge St. '
Unit A Vail, CO 81657 ' '
410 17th St.
Suite 1600 ;
Denver, CO 80202 : ,�
. --- ------ -- - ---
--__ _ __- -
Maurice Rinehardt Vail Associates
PO Box 5397 Box 7
LIghthouse Point, FL 33074 Vail, CO 81657
j _
,. . ._-- ----- ----------------
Jay Precourt
1560�`Broadway ' US Forest Service
Suite 2000 PO Box 190
Denver, CO 80202 Minturn, CO 81645�:�-�w�!:c
. _--
--- --- --- --
Barbara Osbourne __ __ Kindelco, Inc. �
1531 Walnut St. . � 356 Hanson Ranch Road __ _
Philadelphia, PA 19102 Vail, CO 81657 �
- __ - -_
------ - -
--- -- --
Margretta Parks Edwin Whitehead
PD tidx 14�Fo 15 Valley Dr.
g��� �� �Af'�' �o Greenwich, CT 06830
gl6�� -
._ __
__ -- —, -
- -- - - -- i - - —
Oscar Tang � Town of Vail I
100 Park Avenue I 75 S. Frontage Rd. - i
New York, NY 10017 .- � Vail, C0 81657 _ -
_ � �
� � " -
� _ �
---- -=-- - - _. __ _ .
- -- - - , . � - - -
r Robert Lazier �
Jon Shirley � - � --
2019 Evergreen Point i Box 627 _ _
Medina, WA 98039 ;, .� Vail, CO 81658 - __
- ; 1 - . -
, _ _� _ : -
- - ;-� - - = _ - _ -- -
Charles Rosenquist I � ;j - _ _ _
PO Box�686 _ - _ _ . i = -
Vail, CO :;= 81657 � _ _ _ �i _ _ -
, ` �:; '. °.�- .. .; - - - _ - - , __
_ _ �
- - ---- �`- �-�=--,- = - -��- - - =
. _ , , . -__ : ,.
.::
_ _
,odge at Vail �.; . _ : . _ .. �_: ..: a=:.-
!74 Gore Creek Dr. . =_ . �.. _:g, ',' ' ,:;. . � . = -
, � _ _
iail, CO 81657 I � -
_ � ' � -
-_.: _. � . ..__.--- - .. . . .... . . . . .� . . , . . _ �. �, _ , _ , . . . _.._. . ._
_� 1
. ' Lodge at Vail 3ridge Street Bldg. Condo Asso• 1 Enslie 0. Oglesby
� • 174 Gore Creek Drive 'r•►t;/0 Brandess/Cadmus Real EstatE� 1925 San Jacinto
, Vsi1,C0 81657 281 Bridge Street Dallas, TX 75201
V�ii., �0 �ib37
N.J. & Llewllyn Nicholas G. Peck & Company James M. Todd
50 Central Park, West 1600 Broadway R.M. & Barbara Euwer
I�Tew York, NY 10023 Suite 2100 5737 South Gallup Street
Denver,CO 80202 Littleton, CO 80120
Robert & Mary B. Galvin Ron & Nancy Slaughter Resident
Rolling Oaks Farm P.O. Box 1508 Suite 2100
Route 68 San Angelo, TX 76902 Denver, CO 80202
Barrington, IL 60010
Richard K. Parker Richard D. Bass Stephen S. Redding
44 South Birch Street `1601 Elm Street Angela Redding
Denver, CO 80222 fSuite 4224 P.O. Box 1274
Dallas, TX 75201 Santa Barbara, CA 93117
W. Grant Williams Frances Gunn B.A. Jr. & Barb Bridgewate
;�2 Ladue Lane 3101 Valley Oak Drive 8400 Maryland Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63124 Loveland, CO 80538 St. Louis, MO 63105
P. & R. Enterprises Villa-�ahalla Condo. Assoc. Marion M.--�1o`yd
288 Bridge Street C/0 Christiana 25060 St. Marys Road
Vail, CO 81657 P.O. Box 758 Libertyville, IL 60048
Vail, CO 81658
R. K. & Nancy S. Parker Robert an Dena Tucker Gore Greek Plaza Building
44 South Birch Street 1 Sherry Moor Drive C/0 Vail Management C0.
Denver, CO 80222 Englewood, CO 80110 201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Creekside Condo Assoc. Belltower Partners, Ltd. Blanche Aill
C/0 Vail Management C0. P.O. Box 68 311 Bridge Street
201 Gore Greek Drive Vail, CO 81658 Vail, CO 81657
Vail, CO 81657 - ! .
, I
�
Hong Kong Cafe Bldg. Plaza Lodge Association Rucksack, Inc. �
1183 Cabin Circle Drive P.O. Box 68 288 Bridge Street- '.
Vail, CO 81657 Vail,�:;CO 81658 � Vail, CO 81657 -
: . R __ .-
_ _',: - ._ _ _ -:
_ -- _ -- � _ - _ . _ ��--- __ - - _ - __
.. _ -:_. � . - . _ :
.
�. Galitan; Lodge : � -" Covered Bridge Building `: . > ; Rodney Slifer =
�- .C/0 The`:Hare Group_ _ Hillis Aiken -: _ �230,- Bridge Street �_
= '- 3170 Sheiks Place ` �j x �. 174 Gore .Creek Drive Vail,. CO ' 81657 �'
= Colorado: Springs, C0 ��� Vail, CO� .' 81657 -�F � _ _= -
� ',< _.;��" ,:80904 . ::-.: : ._ _ - s -
.: . :
_
.
--- - __s� : .. . . . - _ -
.. -_�.. _ ... . . . _-:, _ . __. , . .-. . - .. .. ,.. - - r
_ ... , .. . ,_. . . . . . . . .. _ . _
286 Bridge Street,, Inc. Oliv C. atson °:.: '' ` ' " -`�
__ Y _: . . .
` _ = . . -, _. .
� 701 Southeast 6th �venue Old.'`;Oc rd Road '� -' � "-
. . :, - .; _ :,_ . _
Delray,`-'FL :- 33483 : _ ---: � , ..:;
- - _ _ _ - - -
' ���
� I:, • �
�- ��� 93 �e� w� s.�.�. - � ��r
�. � � - ��� G� �-- T�-� � � � - s.�- z3� ��. .,�
,c�, ��- c � -� -
_ �� n�—Z� � '`a,e,v�° _��.,(` - � .z� /,,%e�,�
.� �;�d� -�
— ���Cc� � 02^�-�-e�� ic�`-., ,dy,�,o;� -�%Z`.
�. In/, —�► // ��
Cc� �i -Z`�� o���c ���cm-ca� �P ou-� �/�'�e .
(/
� �-i' ��� . .c� ay��' �-�' �� . _
�. �v, - N� � �/`�` � � "'�-Le� .e��o;., ov- T�-� ,E' . _
- S.�/.�-� � -�as�"-�
-- I�J�` p�' � !� � �^� ��'- ""�
�� O
G. C• - �-�, � .��� . — Q��- +� �� /� . '� ,
- �e-,%L� c c�` i�-� .�. dK Q►-. .t�
�. �. --�- y�, � � .�. ,r� v�9 .��� �
�.%.-'.--(� /°�' c ^�-�,.� /
, T�e �G�, .v�. .�- � o,�. �. � .�'� . 7,i�
._ � � .
- C�,=� .z��e s� �%�` ' _
�t � .r
` l�o f c� G G��� o�— �3i�c.� ,5�
�. �, - � �,��..�.t ���`3 � ���� � .��--� _
� ' �- �� dv � ��
- .� 7- , �
. �.�... . !�x` ���� .�.�.- i�.��.-�e 5 - /f�
�
_ .� ��e .�%�. -
- - ��` • �� .�� ��,.�. �'�,
,�
-- _ ---�
�
- �._ �.-_ -4 �--��___ �.���
-- - =- --��
���- ---
� � • - .e� ,�..L
. . .
---- -- - - _ _ _ -- r - _. _.__ _ _ ___ _. _------ -
. . � � � -�
� � . r2 �C �
!
,Z I
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on January 11, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a
CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates,
Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
2. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.32 and Chapter 18.38 of the Vail
Municipal Code relating to uses allowed in open space zone districts.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte
3. A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for the development of
single family homes located on Tracts A and 6, The Valley, Phase II/1480 Buffer Creek
Rd.
Applicant: Steve Genster/Parkwood Realty
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for the establishment of a new zone district called Ski Base Recreation II.
Applicant: Ron Riley
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
5. A request for variances for site coverage and setbacks to allow the remodel of a
residence located at 315 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Howard and Judy Berkowitz
Planner: Shelly Mello
6. A request for a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village Area A, Millrace III to
amend the approved development plan to allow for one single family residence and
one duplex located at 1335 Westhaven Drive, more specifically described as follows:
�q�:
. . • � �
�
A part of the SW 1/a, NE Ya, Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of
the 6th P.M., described as follows:
Beginning at a point of the North-South centerline of said Section 12 whence an
iron pin with a plastic cap marking the center of said Section 12 bears
S00°38'56"W 455.06 feet; thence along said centerline N00°38'56"E 122.81 feet
to the southerly ROW line of I-70; thence departing said ROW line N66°53'25"E
39.15 feet; thence departing said ROW line S81°23'19"E 165.42 feet to a point
of curve; thence 122.83 feet along the arc of a 143.20 foot radius curve to the
left, having a central angle of 49°08'51" and a chord that bears S15°57'45"E
119.10 feet; thence S40°32'10"E 3.00 feet; thence 66.30 feet along the arc of a
77.21 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 49°12'10" and a
chord that bears S15°56'05"E 64.28 feet; thence S8°40'00"W 90.27 feet; thence
N38°42'24"W 224.55 feet; thence S78°10'32"W 101.44 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
Applicant: MECM Enterprises, Inc. represented by Michael Lauterbach
Planner: Jim Curnutte
7. A request for setback variances to allow the construction of two awnings to be located
at the Mountain Haus/292 E. Meadow Drive/a portion of Block 5, Vail Village First
Filing.
Applicant: Preston Jump representing the Mountain Haus Condo
Association
Planner: Jim Curnutte
8. A request for a setback variance, at the Manor Vail Lodge to allow the construction of
a trash enclosure, located on a Part of Lot 1, Block B, Vail Village Seventh Filing/595
East Vail Valley Drive.
Applicant: Manor Vail Lodge
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
9. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a major arcade (family entertainment
center) to be located at the Crossroads Shopping Center, located on Lot P, Block 5D,
Vail Village First Filing/141 East Meadow Drive.
Applicant: Charlie Alexander
Planner: Tim Devlin
10. Review of staff policy on vending carts (ie. espresso carts).
Staff: Tim Devlin
Glive C, k9atson � TRoma Pritzker ��
' I�M Corporation Mad on Plaza
. � Old' Orchard Road ���' '
Armonk, NY 10504
Sam and Nancy Gary Thomas Pritzker
370 17th Street Madison,Plaza
Suite 5300 200 West Madison
Denver, CO 80202 Chicago, IL 60606
Pepi Gramshammer JRH-1 Trust
231 East Gore Drive 4600 South Monroe Lane
Vail, CO 81657 Englewood, CO 80110
Mill Creek Court Condo
C/0 Slifer Management C0.
143 E. Meadow Drive,
Vail, CO 81657
George Washington Knox
291 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
One Vail Place Condo Assoc.
C/0 Blanche Hill , �
311 Bridge Street
Vail, GO 81657
Gorsuch, Ltd.
John McBride
263 East Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
Anthony & Constance Ridder
1801 West 27th Street
Sunset ?Island
Miami, FL 33140
Walter Patrick Gramm
695 Prospect Street
Winetka, IL 60093
Stuart Colton
232 Hartshorn Drive
Shorthills, NJ 07078
Thom Pritzker
Madis P1
Linda Craddock Wall Street Building Assoc.
Box 2979 � � 386 Hanson Ranch ROad
Colarado Springs, CO 80901 Vail, CO 81657
Howard Berkowitz Plaza Lodge Assoc.
888 7th Ave. PO Box 68
New York, NY 10106 Vail, CO 81658
Hill Building
Jerome Lewis 311 Bridge St.
Unit A Vail, CO 81657
410 17th St.
Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80202
Maurice Rinehardt Vail Associ�tes
PO Box 5397 Box 7
Llghthouse Point, FL 33074 Vail, CO 81657
Jay Precourt
1560 Broadway US Forest Service
Suite 2000 PO Box 190
Denver, CO 80202 Minturn, CO 816�5 '- _
Barbara Osbourne Kindelco; Inc.
1531 Walnut St. 356 Hanson Ranch Road
Philadelphia, PA 19102 Vail, CO 81657
Margretta Parks Edwin Whitehead
�d 3ox 19�� 15 Valley Dr.
�
�A�le, CD Greenwich, CT 06830
grb3f
Oscar Tang Town of Vail
100 Park Avenue 75 S. Frontage Rd.
New York, NY 10017 Vail, CO 81657
Jon Shirley Robert Lazier
2019 Evergreen Point Box 627
Medina, WA 98039 Vail, CO 81658
Charles Rosenquist
PO Box 686
Vail, CO 81657
Lodge at Vail
174 Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
�Lodge at Uail �ridge Street Bldg. Condo Asso Enslie 0. Oglesby
� 174 Gore Creek Drive C/0 Brandess/Cadmus Real Estate'� 1925 San Jacinto
Vail,CO 81657 281 Bridge Str�et Dallas, TX 75201
' Vail, CO �1657
N.J. & Llewllyn Nicholas G. Peck & Company James M. Todd
50 Central Park, West 1600 Broadway R.M. & Barbara Euwer
New York, NY 10023 Suite 2100 5737 South Gallup Street
Denver,CO 80202 Littleton, CO 80120
Robert & Mary B. Galvin Ron & Nancy Slaughter Resident
Rolling Oaks Farm P.O. Box 1508 Suite 2100
Route 68 San Angelo, TX 76902 Denver, CO 80202
Barrington, IL 60010
Richard K. Parker Richard D. Bass Stephen S. Redding
44 South Birch Street ;'1601 Elm Street Angela Redding
Denver, CO 80222 � Suite 4224 P.O. Box 1274
Dallas, TX 75201 Santa Barbara, CA 93117
W. Grant Williams Frances Gunn B.A. Jr. & Barb Bridgewate�
��2 Ladue Lane 3101 Valley Oak Drive 8400 Maryland Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63124 Loveland, CO 80538 St. Louis, MO 63105
P. & R. Enterprises Villa Vahalla Condo. Assoc. Marion M. Lloyd
288 Bridge Street C/0 Christiana 25060 St. Marys Road
Vail, CO 81657 P.O. Box 758 Libertyville, IL 60048
Vail, CO 81658
R. K. & Nancy S. Parker Robert an Dena Tucker Gore Greek Plaza Building
44 South Birch Street 1 Sherry Moor Drive C/0 Vail Management C0.
Denver, CO 80222 Englewood, CO 80110 201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Creekside Condo Assoc. Belltower Partners, Ltd. Blanche Hill
C/0 Vail Management C0. P.O. Box 68 311 Bridge Street
201 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81658 Vail, CO 81657
Vail, CO 81657
Hong Kong Cafe Bldg. Plaza Lodge Association Rucksack, Inc.
1183 Cabin Circle Drive P.O. Box 68 288 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81658 Vail, CO 81657
Galitan Lodge Covered Bridge Building Rodney Slifer
C/0 The Hare Group Hillis Aiken 230 Bridge Street
3170 Sheiks Place 174 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657
Colorado Springs, CO Vail, CO 81657
80904
286 Bridge Street, Inc. Oliv C. atson
701 Southeast 6th Avenue Old Oc rd Road
Delray, FL 33483
. . . � �
!� .R�'J
� 1�
�"��� THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
.,�
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmentai Commission of the Town of
Vail wiii hold a public hearing in accordance with Sec:�on 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vaii on December 14, 1992, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
i. A joint work session witn tne rtV and uRB to discuss a request ror ine
establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a
minor subdivision, a zone change and an amendment to View Corridor No. 1
for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block
;r�;:=.�'°
2, Vail Village First Filing.
�T `� Appiicant: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
2. A request for setback variances to allow construction of a deck at the Kandell
residence, 4259 Nugget Lane East, Lot 2, Bighorn Estates Resubdivision of
Lots 10 and 11.
Applicant: Bob Kandell
Pfanner: Tim Devlin
• 3. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.24 Commercial Core I and
Chapter 18.26 Commercial Core II of the Town of Vail Zoning Code (relating to
exterior alterations).
Applicant: Town of Vail
Planner: Mike Mollica
4. A request for variances for site coverage and setbacks to allow the remodel of
a residence located at 315 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village First
Filing.
Applicant: Howard and Judy Berkowitz
Planner: Shelly Mello
, � , � � .
----- - — --_.-- v�l�i,^'�''"'
V �°°a
��jl�f — �—��!./_
/
� .
��
��_,(';i l l l f{�.f
,�
ill
Lodge at Vail
174 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
. �
�
. �
j
� ;+. � :
, � � ..
�, i' � �� .
;� . � ��-��
,� ��
�...
� „r.;� i •�;
ll
' . ' Y '
>
_..
Bridge Street Bldg. Condo Assoc.
c/o Brandess/Cadmus Real Estate
281 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
0
�
ro
L
Q
Q
�
/
...u..-��..r+�cs6-�a.�'JnKVfL«"<tiwe.i4i�:T'L;�,.-'.+���+��i�. a, V�a .. . .:
. ... ._. ..,_. ,.. ,....� , „., _ ... � . ._. . _ ,. .. ..,� , ..,. _ _ . ?'+ .. .�.i:'S�v,eF:e:wi��.t.�s�K&''a+!xi'�.v.,R+:'iLr°,±�.���.
_ _ Enslie 0. Oglesby
1925 San Jacinto
, Dallas, TX 75201
i
' o
��
) �
� o
�o
7V
V�
�...,.,� ...�..wartied..+r�.n;�• . ..:..,..,r+i+'J.,..-��'v.++li.w;r: ...., �',,,Q,.:.4,i.;�?aU�s.�'.;r.=r .::r?"��k:��B,,.lt�a�•,°'�iW.�-a4e:}E�� ,�.'`��T�'*�..r??)�9i����i4.��'t'��'+"fi;.E1' "���y'y
--.��av-:�S^.� . . . ... . _ •� R`�.v.'
' " '
)
)
N.J. & Llewllyn Nicholas
50 Central Park,. W.
; New York, NY 100�3
' I
' o
��
) �
� o
�o .
}U
J�
. � ..,.. �
. ..,.... _ .,.. �., ,.. �. . .. :r� . . �- . .,_ ._ ..
� -
' � � ' ' �
�. r n � ��
. o�n • �_�
) CV(O ��'
N r w
� �� �
� �; �i�-i� si
_ �
) M
O '
' M
)
: G. Peck & Company
L 1600 Broadway
� Suite .2100
- � Denver, CO 80202
s •�
. o
j Y
� O
: ��
� U �
� n� o
• o0
� (}U
� T�
� N�
.�.,.-�.:.... .:.,. � ..--,-.--�.
p ..
� ...t;.......,.�..,e....�: . ..+....t:.:. �a:-..a.....,..,._:..-.,... ...�-:....:�• �� '^ _ � „ '�.�:r»! -.,
n , . . . .. ._ � . .-. . .... .A�..Ma7. .. .� -� q��!=���..,
�
C''
O
C7
James M. Todd
� R.M. & Barbara D. E;uwer
� 5737 South Gallup �;treet
o Littleton, CO 801�:0
Y
� O
�� .
U �
� o
�U
.-=
N�
__.._. . �..�.. 4,.., �
�J . . �" ..,�. _.>��:' . . h.,,e:-....G:s.+�.n+ix.. eC -;w:-,,,,a,..w::�'�e.e.fi:7� ��-�:<. .,,�,..,��:4df�v.r,++AV.f'«m f:F'P�..�":}��x:4'�e*L3�.&,�.. ���-�-" .+wf�'4,',�.�
Robert & Mary B. GaJ_vin
Rolling Oaks .�'arm
Route 68 `
; Barrington, I� 60010
.�_
0
Y
� O
��
U �
�
mo
�U
C7
T�
N�
.. . ...,..... .. ,:t�;t: :�..,::.., a:s,�� �r%., . . -
� �
,� ' , • • ��:.,
C�
-�� ' �!
� �
,�� . �i����,f' ����
t: , (� �
C7 . -
O
C`�
Ron & Nancy Slaughter
P.O. Box 1508
�
San Angelo, TX 76902
>
�
�
� o
��
ca �s
� `o
�U
�
r-_
N�
_.. .�_.._.�_......,.,-��...:,-Tm--s.s�.cccr.c;;-�'-,.,..; _._.._:�."LL-.�i.o,"M-^.,. u,�. . "_"','. _'.� . . . .. _ _ �
. .. .___. ._ .-_-.� ._
.. . _.
. .. . . -�:. ...:.. ..... .,.1,....:. �.�. ... .......... ,a,'.�. . .�. , ,... .'. ., �.�..;..'.-.W s;,.,...:���:.,.,NT�.,�.:y:Y.i.�-�,_x'..
Suite 2100
Denver, CO 80202
0
-o _____—
�
�
o �
0
U
ro
>
.. -.4,�«�,.�� . ; ..,
. �x,.�7iv...�uaw.....-�.,:�ti;?�v.r�i+.ps�.hws-cU,"�c�t'ri•w?:9wz..�h�:;• -„t,:-.t,p;A`ir+,�w..�k4i;r�. aµ. ;�,f„t�+r�� � ,i.�n� � . . �"` -
. . _ . w-3e@t'� �✓>� tfr,�u?�EJ�§�.a . .. 's1..c,F+a.;'.. 4'�:.
Richard K. Parker
44 South Birch Street
Denver, CO 80222
�
S
S
i
i
� � I
S f
1
..u7F.s^�c� . .� t r k � r � <<
d:-..; �� _t., �� � �"3� s+n±,� 3_.`��z t S�� �'��5�<l ,�,�,r�.,�,� �,.� i�y"�. ��'+n'��.�-��5 �� �,�5a" i°'✓. .�"ty�..W a.�,-s.
� s . 1 ;,
. � �
. . , . ._ Fd� ".
�.-� �#'�h '� E � �m�.�y } ' i{ a w T � ? ; �.�. �..
y,��.. ,�,a.s t, = �r #-� �,. �. ...�.� . � r � ; � -�� �� -�. �
�` _ �+�'M"���` ,�' ;+trh t-� .{`� � �i �� i� - s -� �. _ ��G{�c ; F�
�� (�� ,c '�i��'�yn,tt,�, _ in' r ( ' �;s � -. �`�' �'.�'y '-!a -. ,�nya,,vry h. . ,;p},.-k, �'+ y �3�2���
�` �� �v.r`�`�'� r -�•r 2`�' "t'�,�-r s '�'`n, �i:,•�, - .e'' '� w``���P `4 �xr�k fi°" � ° z k�. rE''�c``t g �' �
,'�'�,1 .;F �.m �"Ya ;xx A k r ,�� Y �``-. -'' s+�� �?+`9�*���,f r-�s ,�� ��y � �s.�����t36 t� �'• r ` �'
• , . . ,� y.., ,. iy w,� .. 3..' '�#. i `�„y.1° .`\i.�r �1�' ��.v�e .i.� � G ,#. ;� 4i
.. i.. .->, a ��"� z .. E � "'� `�`�-�a.z � y ��, �E S.a-Y ..:", . ry�� �,,,, d. t t ����t,��.";.�-x s "�''�c�
§3'"Nx�"�;°�i`�`nG2 n.:=s r`Z.e��k`�, x t i°`�q t�}����tr .�` : 'Y°��'�°k�l p� �S �',a t�` � "�?c��'€���� r .-._
� .y �� ` ts��,x�k�;t" r.,�,�r,�t.'� 1�&;_ � �r-�'�r r g � S i �'�'�.. `3r,f, S'�' i��,-��„�" 4+�,�F. �� e�����.�ia��.��*
� �-j5� x � �.g't 3��'uµf���"�'.�m �, c.�i` .-�3. ,,rt�„� .A� 1 �!' 9i;F. x � �,
{k �
} ,
li Y -g .b � S
Y- a�.y '�.� `` � k� �� �r._ .�1p' "���* ,n M`' �`:"° � ';'�„�� '+��`-rf '�
_ .. .��1 �,�c:g ` ... - , ��`' . . ,� . .. . ,5 � . �"_ . .'�t"•_`��i',.r � , -- F�t-.a- 'r y
.. - . . . . -`x?S;2
. � � , FI/J1Y^ ^ L
��a�-::'�;
!c�D �.,� 'Jr
�pTp r►,.1 ' '! �1
• - 1
1 `il
� ,
�
�
Richard D. Bass
1601 Elm Street
Suite 4224
� Dallas, TX 75201
; o
�
. �
..
. o
�o
U
:>
._....�..______�_,._.....,�......_,:�a.:,�«.-a._�--�'r�----.--,— _ . .-�-•_--�•----'�-�-'-^�---'--�—.----- �:—��..�e ���y. ;�-`.'�1'����,
_..
- .•- .. .,..c a -s....,.�
Stephen S. Redding & Angela Redding
P.O. Box 1274
Santa Barbara, CA 93117
,,.,,, � = K.. .. ;: .,.,�,.;;�x� ..�-� :�v�r�� : a�-� K��,.'.�i ;";+�a ���"�''� y
. . . . .. . , . . . . _ ... .. . �[�K��4
W. Grant Williams
#2 Ladue Lane
St. Louis, MO 63124
. �
(
�
� _ ��P. : ,,-.> :�;� - r - r,. ,:..�:
G� ��
O� � � �
_U N�
� ' ;�
�
.� � •Rr�
U ch
L Q
�` �
0
� __.
C
'� Frances Gunn
a 3101 Valley Oak Drive
� Loveland, CO 80538
__ �,
� •�
c o
c3 Y
°� o
C �'-o
O U �
� u� o
� �U
C •-=
� N�
- �r :-.,., ._ -- - ---- ___ -_ __ _ _ - -
--- ------ ---
V----4-wtD . . .�_.__ _. - . .. ,., ._-:. .. .. . . _ . _ ... .._ . . . . . . _ .. ..- - - ���- �
Q) �N . - � `'. �
� � ,�i 1
V M 1{
� M ,�
Q
•
(n
C ---_ �
Y •
°- B. A. ,7r. & Barbara Bridgewater
� 8400 Maryland Avenue
1y
-� .` St. Louis, MO 63105
_ o
t� Y
� O
� ��
U `s
� a� o
> o 0
� �U
~ T�
� N�
�"���--.—.�.........�a��c.c.:.....,.i.. .. . :n.�,:..�..a�.�v. -:.+.u.;".a. ,. .. . ..,, , _... . . � . -. _ .,. .. .e. , . ��-T..',i,M1,�.e.,.S::�x�.f��=.��if�.�.-
� �E
n '�
�
:
,
z � �
� P & R Enter �
r
• �, p i's e s
j � 288 Bridge Street
� p Vail, CO 81657
Y
�
p> O
U c�u
�
a� o
�_
0 0
(�U
,-=
N�
. , . .. . � ... � ' ,R... ., '-' ... . .... . . . . . ,
� , -__,_._ __
• . � � , . .�':�
j n �fff,�=.,���
t�J�a
�
�� � �
�•- = --- �
�W ,�"i� ��
�.�i
. � -
)
>
)
Villa Vahalla Condominium Assoc.
c/o Christiana
� P.O. Box 758
Vail, CO 81658
0
�
; �
0
;o
:U
�
,
_ - _�..�.c..�:�:,,��,x�c,- ..: -.— . ___,- - __..__.. .>,- -- _. ._. __. . ___ ._n._.......,r..,�...,a..��
Marion M. Lloyd
25060 St. Marys Road
Libertyville, IL 60048
, � - �.��..-�-�_ T.,_ ,�,.� �.
� ��•:..�. -_____-�-, �
. . . . r,r...�.>.� .� .. . _.. ... ,.. . , . .:.�_.�:m. ,.w :.�:.-xor:+FaW:,•i,a,..va�%aawi�,� -'S..�&;A ,
1
R.K. And Nancy S. Parker
44 South Birch Street
Denver, CO 8p222
. �
� (
� `
B
� y
�
)
s'
,,..
�g' �
� �t
� �;
� �
�. .::. >
,
,�. � , .:_.�. . :_._. , � . �- . „ .�� _ ��<..
.,,. , .... , ,
s
�. , ��.
.
. . .. . ,_, . . .._T.. ...<. :,;., , ._ _. . � . �. .
--: � � , ���
, - ��
) • o�j �t
� c�co ,�;.�::
N+—
) �CO . - � i�c
� M
O
l �
, _ __
�
Robert and Dena Tucker
� 1 Sherry Moor Drive
� Englewood, CO 80110
_ �
3 �
— p
�j x
�' o
_ `�
] U �
� � o
� �—
' �U
�
- r—
n '7 J'
... �.— -_..-..-�--.-�r..-- _..!_-`�---r^- - . _ .e. .o..F...v.fYw.c�+rWt}+JGn A.};.p�ty:pF�' _. W+kiw�.
^�a�:a!^:-;n:'F`:�`Ai.`.�C''''=:.a-a�r .. . ,..i�i�...: .�. .. ���.:�.:-.- -. _ .
Gore Creek_Pl�za Building
> c/o Vail Management Company
0 201 Gore Creek Drive
� Vail, CO 81657
��
U �s
a� o
�U
r-_
N�
��"'ct'°°'�"� -
���ti_.,;;,�. ,
� M a--"r,-�a.w-:- i...k�:, «�a,*�.�.a,.. �.,ar . . . , ��
' ..•., u„�+. �.�. .
� O . � . M n.�a..c..��.. . . . 'kiS
� �
�
�
� .'.____'_
Y
�- Creekside Condominiums Assoc.
0
_ � c/o Vail Management Company
� .� 201 Gore Creek Dr,ive
— � Vail, CO 81657 �
� a ,
o �
� U�
� a� o
� o` o
� �)U
_" .—r-
� N�
�
:, k,. ,� ,�
A •�- -
<.. , , - .. , _ . .�.,
a. . ..
_ �..
.
_.
- - �
-.
� -
, Ta: ,,. .� _
�, . . . ....�. , ,- <. . . .. _ ,..;. G. �'
—- � �l/ . . `�"�-��_
. ,'�,..,
.�.rr
r �
� � �„q�,i�,i._!�f *� I ,
�
CO " Y
Belltower Partners, Ltd.
P.O. Box 68
Vail, CO 81658
�
;�o
� c�
�
� o
'U
1
i>
_ _. .. .. _ _ . -- . ,�..-.�ar.�..�..:�:»�.�-..:.�..K.:,�,r
Blanche Hill
311 Bridge Street ,
Vail, CO 81657 ��
-;�:�:.�.��•,�_,�_....�_ � _.__.--,.,,,,,._R____t_____ ----�--
� ---w--... ..�.,� ...-.�--.,�:.�.:�.:t.,..�:.,:+.�.V..>:�, ,. -,�.>�:. . -
' K�..,....� a. . s. ,. ...t wic.��kY=�r.' :+y;,!'itrl .wa�:weJ..-z�..4�er�.:�.,s:J...�vTs?Caw.,�s..F+ci:+�Yr..ititkS''�aa�..�:` .. �.�Nl��
)
Hong Kong Cafe Bldg.
1183 Cabin Circle J�rive
Vail, CO 81657 �
`
0
�
c�
�
0
0
�
ro
>
� ,
.._.., , .. , ,�x ,. .: ., _. ,<. _ _ . , .� . � .,. . �� , . •�.,�
_ __._ ,. �+ _ _ �' _ _ , .
^ ' . . ., � �--.
. ��-�
'`�, �
1 CO_ �
1 r- -�
�CO ; ��M�1 111 ,�y�
^�j
, �
�
�
>
Plaza Lodge Association
: P.O. Box 68
� Vail, CO 81658
; o
�
. cu
�
O
: O
U
,>
__. ._..�______�.._.�...._...-. �_..,.., .,�<-..,,- —.-t.:�-.- ----
,�-_---.__...._�_.._�..-..._._____ .___._______..._. _ �._
�
C
�Y Rucksack, Inc.
v 288 Bridge Street
_ � Vail, CO 81657 _____ _
a •� .
� o
C� Y
� O
O U�
� a� o`
5 0` 0
� �J U
.--
n N�
.
�=+""_°cD'r^�°.,�,�-,^.-:.-.
_ ._�:-- -- -
.._ ^ __ ._._._ �,,_.
;..,. ,..., ,..-..,.�.___.___
�,�,;. _. �-.-
..0 [t ,.,...-,- ....., ��.,�r...�n�:�>.,...,.,..,: . —._^.--•� ..-^-----•-----.._.... .
U � -- .,... .,. ..... . . .s;.p ��-` �,��
� O
Q M , J
i
' 1
� ,
�
�
�.
0
_ � Galitan Lodge
a .` c/o The Hare Group
� 0 3170 Sheiks Place
a� Colorado Springs, CO 80904
� �'�
O U ca
� mo
`oo
O C7 V
C —
`n N�
� � �
: ,. � . ��..; ,. , ",:w y
- +S; A
i. ..4 %,
.�. . ih
�-`" k`,
h�
w
�1.. +l i"
.._ ...r-.- r� F;.... -� � - ... .>. . . �S �t�Y
� t a"
. ,.. . . � • . ....
.-�.: .. �'• ' , �
.. ... . . . . ' ... � :.r .:... ..:..-,.T -:...... ;.. :.: .. .:.:
. � � � � ���
� Tn • �
o�n ' �
N(D
N� �;��:1 _
� �i
n • �
�
(O
O
� .
Covered Bridge Building
Hillis Aiken
� 174 Gore Creek Drive
o Vail, CO 81657
�
°� o
��
U �
� o
�U
T�
N�
�-�._n_Tan.:.,n. �,. -:��=c,�ar �-T-�-�-:--,-:��....r- . "-^' . ,_..._ ..._. .._ ,. .,v- �.,. .... .. ...., . . .
..--�—'-- "_'__-_'-.__........-..�.r..�,._.�.,_:..,. __:t..... ... � ... . . .,,. . . . �
�. ..,..k.�_. .6.-,.: . ..:r:,,....�...:..�k.» � v .n'. q. y... ,.ro.Y,.;.,:•a«��c-63�,... .,� �:
Rodney Slifer
230 Bridge Street
.� . ��� � Vail, CO 81657
>
0
Y
� O
��
U �a
�
a� o
�}U
�=
N� '
II
i
1`
1
;�i--�i"..'°'°"m°ara+aa�:..a.=r,-'a"'��C....'^+.,'^�.- .. . .a, �, c �_ , ...:.:dR` ti+eG1*?keiG ,ia'�^Y.���;>p ...,�!sar�:i�cMe >'�: --' . _.
,'k:}:.1 �+l �-�;c ,i�e'.;�'a.-vL.`i+S..d3� ':r�...
,•n{��c+`.<c=:ii..n„k;'.+ha"�!`�Ys:�
i
286 Bridge Street, Inc.
" 701 Southeast 6th Avenue
�, Delray, FL 33483
>
.`
0
Y
� O
N�
U �
c� o
�U
T�
N J
�' '�" �� `
: ..
, j,,>,. ,�
.., �:. .,..r+°.tY-- �; �.. . .,, ,:>:. . . �a .. _ � _:Y�
� �_
. . , _ . .. .. . .. ... ,... .a'a.. � . ,_. . . . .. . .. _ . .... ... _. ... . . .. . .
_ -- �
r-r\• ' ., . � . • 1��=�--
O u2 ' ��
N tp �
�m •�.? -tn ;
� . �
v �
co �.,._._- _ ..
0
co
Olive C. Watson
IBM Corporation
, Old Orchard Road
� Armonk, NY 10504
�� o
,
_-D
:� �
�� O
,a�
��
N� .
_ ...�__�_...__.....`.......,.......-�-v...a�.,�..-..x-�-�--� r . ------•�-'^'..- —.— .....,..� ........ . .. _. ..._. .. . �. �_ ..., . .. .. � >.,-..u�.w ae,
— ,�. —.... ..._ �...-_
_..... .._. ._ -- - -- - a*,:__ . ._,_..�,a...«.,�.....,...... _._.J.. .. ,... ��. . �.. .__. ,�.r".. . -..: ..,...y .. .ti.q»._L:�_:'�,
Sam and Nancy Gary
. 370 17th Street
Suite 5300
� Denver, CO 80202
>
•L
Q • _—"_'
Y � .
� O S
�v
U � �
c� o
00
�U
T�
N�
_�_...�._�.�_,.-•,��-r�r.u:a��'�..,RSr.T:'�'�':..� w��e,..-�..wo *r.. 'k.z� '. '. "..'q'+ .,2 ' .-h%' :t%C"*.i.'r'L#n . ., _ ...o-�...� .. � . . . � _ . .
. �. . ..>v. .,:fvetrs. . .a�1Nr�M.+w �,i:X�4 n �....74s �;isiu, �.na�«72+�-�t:'w3y�s":' �%: Yi...r�.7'fNir�''.
Pepi Gramshammer
' 231 East Gore Drive
„ Vail, CO 81657
�
.`
0
; Y
°' o
� �v
i U �
3 � o
• o 0
� �ry U
. �_
) N�
�^�°•'�' �s
� �„ ' � .. � h� m�+^'a'�'n . :, ?' � _f�r �'�+��.' Y - l.
�S+,Lr C d;A }� � � -_^� 4
w���,t� ; "'r°''c1 ��� ,�. � r�r�;� �p�,,t�X�,`.y��.C3 . � �,-� '1.� :.
�t;. is° � � � ^ '�,'� 7 t P � � ,��,�r� 4.� �`rc +� ��,'.,t�� .-� f 4 r y.
�,.k wa�$, ' 'i x �;��g�y�e'�'.a�a �,&'4k'� �"���'i,ft ' �Y"i�k'€�,'"'.�'e, +,�`?` �' �`� ,.t' '� -.
S a r>. '� yr�a` x4f `a� � r ,.� �,3 �fi._,4 � �;- � .�d.�. .�, �,. :.: a i�" s.,` �,.�
�' � �T t L�i f"!EC � "# Y`�.� +r.. R '� a5 li ..
y" �"�1"'a:� a�� %a i�''���g�'r�• �.i�ti�t��� *c�,y�z . �S r� ia^'�'`"Eg��'�� �r `af �`��S cr i*'.`�"r{*�' � 'Y�Y_.,�'"�� �s .�"'i,��,:
T. z�r} T" �.j� �..y �t� '�F �w�y�t ', �,si¢' `A �a.:'YS � �.yE^! 7,T+,� y xcd�. .� ' a�S
s 4 n?'�, "�� i�'"-a'.'!.r � Ab� k� 1 a* .. t 3 qkat r I . a.d� .Y''S L 7 ° �/' �
', r�� _ >i �a�s z "�C ,�i.! � u - � � � t ; �. q s �, � s, > �� x x .. ,�
��,�:Y .�. y� x 14�.����� ��_:� L�".��4 ����� � �'` -'�«�",�w � ��- ?�?��`'" s�- �; _`�-+si���*��; ���
i t �� �S} Y '` �e i f t �
��
�-7 ! ��+r 6t�ax.�p �....� ,y���.�� ���'�.• . �aa+: i�t. . � ��} s,z .
f ¢ '� �r-, ,� ��` � �$ �A° �! .,'�-�.'*",zr- ? ' � �' +r. � ��=�� .� �''�"a' s'*M F Ya'�
'.*� r 3 _� . '� ._ ' t �", - � _ , xF . ���r,. ` .�f
. , � . .. . � � - ., - �'�t..,, a . . . .. .. F".�.
, � � ' . . �,..�`''`—r..-'°
-,I� �..--r-�
J(�p �
�—–
J� �-� �"��r
, "' ' 'l�d�
1
f • � r�
� -
�
)
Mil1 Creek Court Condo Association
c/o Slifer Management Company
, 143 E. Meadow Dr. - Suite 360
= Vail, CO 81657
�
' o
��
»
�
� o
'U
3
i>
--- --_—__.,.,__�..Y.._.�.,...�.,....,,,�..��,�.::�.-.-..,u,�.---�--��---, ----�- ~---�- --�------
..:�.._ . o.,��. �,_......�._�.,:. �.,..,,..,�;.;.a, rr 1,,
,+� ...._,.> ,r....�...-.�.>... .. ...................-..,,d;;..�.�...-d�K-..:swa�.,. a.°+w.u:-,.;:: �,i
George Washington Knox
291 Bridge Street
� Vai�-; ��0 81657
> . '
� �
Y �
� O
��
U �
� o
�U
�_
N�
._ --.�.......��..�era....�Fn.u�e���'�'.-�::..""'�°."�w.�:..w;•»�.:,d.,ekra- �+.Q.i,::::Rn^�+l,n,ac,-9_t ����1'�� .. - ,
u " ' .wfa�+Mft31u:F4�-z+�.Hek,a:i:'�4rtiaf.Wiu3F✓+s��ieb44r4yM+4 •..:�..:�: -�•. .:. .
a�.w 4n�.. �'' �>.`.4 A..+�eiK:..: . . � .. ..
One Vail Place Condo Association
� c/o Blanche Hill
0 311 Bridge Street
� Vail, CO 81657
� o
��
U �
� o
��°}U
T�
N�
,,,� „_' __h,
– -
� o .r .
,., , , . . , ..
. ,� . , s - : -, �,�' ,..;. . _ _
��.
�
, . .._ �... . . g.. .. ... .:s��. , .h..r.�e-: ,.. . d' ;��c;
� �{l�
� ' �:
.
..
;�
. .
. . -
. . - . -
� � : .
-
.
.
� � � �
•� -
: 1
� � I '
�
.
.
.
. - .�
' � � • •
• 11 •
,� �� ,�n�v}���y x`ti k�. � a,���,,���� ir�i ��� ��Y ��.y�n.r, L��.�.�t�+�wE�� ��-�" ..
�:S _ , ,v. ',�GN '�''��`�'TS�"�,!g 'r.�p'{�.�, f �.rAs-���i,tt'��'�.`aR�,�,#,��''�r ,�« ? :'c„ 4 .'�*,'�" �'� - K i' Tr.t ,�T; _
_ 4, "`4 � t ,r ,� �. f��� " �a Sy� ?E � 'y.Y
.�. k v Y $:..� <�s.� k.,�r"s;'.�. �•� �"r�`,�r�r.d�:�c L p`A��'a sM :3�2sa, s�q�, .` �i g,'"eri��ed�,•�„'�2�'a"�I�i.�,�r'�.}�! 'uj°��,r,'�
~ _ s� `,�ss. i r ��r� 'r x
'rs:w�r+.. , . -»..--...:+�....�'t .`�= k .z� , u t*t" s i� 3� ' F�y�`�n'"',i '� :,�i`�.x.�T!.�s.�°3Y �>. ,�sc .t�; "-��f.
3" : -. ..i� e�a'. '... .. �. . � '.
; r ����. � �rMS�n 'j` �-'�'` :e�t ..�'�"+.r�3��'��F �..t�Xa �},i�3a'" r�'s�;-�ss� e -4'`t �. � �"-�. ��'a ��� ,
- �x��i�.�.��'"� z°.t �X W'�t �j7�,.��`,��.?�j �.. �,r� ,z�# � S �, ._ s .�¢ a_� �`.`f i �r '"���," ��,�* �¢ �-- z �{'E�'..'.
' � . ..� L. :.! f :�
�.�""c,z. F" Y K -s�'�.,.sr s��A�. '-R ',+.�..s"` . F*,��s.�' 4`� ' ,'�3:, �r� "'�,t'? �.r . �.��` "-�'.:�°.'�-"�-.�c�'� '`? t--:z ,i-= -
- --- — ._.._ � �..._ �__..__._...._._..� ______._�_..._______- - ; .
1;9!
a . . � . . ����IM
n ��
� " N;�7�[ili •
0
�,�
Stuart Colton
232 Hartshorn Drive
Shorthills, NJ 07078
-r.
��
��° �r:�:.,
���o�
�� �
,..,,:
,
,ar;�[i ',.
; ' o Lt�I ''��'
Thomas Pritzker
Madison Plaza �
200 W. Madison �
Chicago, IL 60606 �
� �'� n',:
� �
��1�'��. �ll'
',
JRH-1 Trust
4600 South Monroe Lane
Englewood, CO 80110
�
�
3
)
i
)
s
. . ' �y.r : � .. . . . ' . ... . . � � . � , .
.. . � . . � � - � . � � . . . � � .
.. . • . ,y� ... . . : . .
�
�r w . � � �
>
� o Q �z
� �
J
J
OW � ��
Q W Za
W ; Q �'
!/1 � Y
Q � a W
2 W �3 �
m
U � w ° ,_,
� au� "
� za = �°
cn � � a - '�-,
� � aO� `° ' ; :.:
� �� � ww f� {'7
� y cp C�� �m : ,-+
`.-900o J �� ° O
JZ
Q O .
T
i�l ��� O `� �� O
V
� � O h p r� W p ,r,.s
�'' � Z
i?' ; W '' fJ
a� �P t�i7 U M �+ (7 Q '
� c? �'�p M li.l [' � T
Z � >... J . �
w ' i
_..
�
y} '� � f
OC� 1,^S� w H
O� a Q � ��Q
� i
W� � J J O� `
>Z Q C� o r [} t; ;y1
� 3 w LL o a i� c�
a �� � W�, �
� ""m
� a�w r tiI li � �
�z Q a X �Ls ( �ti O
� o w ,i
Y � `� U
� � 1 {{ F-
o i� W
� ii �
W i !� �
�
o a Q(4 F� ��;i"� a
� �—
W
a o ��
� o a 4 \ �
� m ~ N � Q
W J Z �
I- Z r J �U � �
¢ �a �� � �
o a z a �p
_ � �
� - W
� Q J
U �
O (
O
Z LL
� r.�.� 7 LL1 W
W � � o a w
m �-+ O o w ¢
� Q � � f F-W `^ ¢
Z p,"�,, a m OC 00 � p
� �"' p > a� -
� � a U' W c� y � _
J p • '� 1`� W i`- � Z �� � )
U ■ F- i17 tL' IiZ Z r
Q ■
J O � tt1 .�-+ a �! '
H � � � W � 0 J '� -i
f"l V > >- C9 � a \ ��
0� �-+ 2 O W f� O � m F-
W a Zl,. t- V J �+ U w
p � � � O Er q _ � cn � t,. _:
"•. Z tfi ..i .J z r ;tJ i s . _
� �-'' ^ 3 "" Z � �-: �
o O r+ 0 � 4 OCd <t
V ~ � � � � �} z �~z z z z z z z z z -
�p O O O O O O O O O O
H H H H H H H H H H _�1
W 0` � � � �� � � � � a d d d � �
Q �� w ,+ Q Wp OC � OC CC OC � � � � � °a ',
p -Z m _ �CC U U U U U U U U U U "� �
� � � Q Q (� (n Cn (n C� (n (n (� C� (� � } �
'� � � W W W W W W W W W W z m
p � � Q Z � .--r❑ � 0 � ❑ � � � � � o .
O �� � Z C7 ' Z O � � � � � 0~C � � � 0~C a W
(n � d �Z � � � � � � d d d d o ¢
_ I
. ,
' • �
PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING•DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS•RESEARCH
January 8, 1993
Mr. Mike Mollica
Community Development Department ,��� � � 19��
To«n of Vail
7�South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 8165?
Dcar Mike:
The purpose of this letter is to formally withdraw the following applications that have been
st.�bmitted in coniunction with the Golden Peak House redevelopment.
1) A. request to amend the Town of Vail Zoning Code to create the Ski Base/Recreation
2onc District.
?) A request to re-zone a portion of Tract E to Ski Base/Recreation Zone District.
3) A request for �. conditional use permit for Los Amigos to construct and operate an
outdoor dining patio on the parcel to be re-zoned.
.'�s «�e h����e discussed, it is our intention to pursue other zoning alternatives in order to
in�orporate the Lo�; Amigos patio with the review of the Golden Peak House building.
Sincerely,
\ \ �"�� - (,
'Thomas A. Braut�, AICP -� ,C �� (�; � / �� �
/� �� 9 2 /�G�``�� � � �50,� .'. �e,
Lc:: Kc>n Rilev
C7erry .4rn�ld
�G�«.Fn� �• � -
:� --- _. :s:,7
Pfi�� _�.. _ -� C-:�,sri .�.___ Ck, �do. .�
�t:�z .�...�...._ s_���°���u� __�
Suite 204,Vail National Bank Building
108 South Frontage Road West • Vail,Colorado 81657 • (303)476-7154
� � � �
l�F�?�n E��-�
PETER )AMAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING•DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS•RESEARCH
December 14, 1992
Mr. Mike Mollica
Community De��elopment Department
To�ti n of Vail
'��outh Frontage Rck�d
!r as�, Cl7 81657
Dear:vli ke:
Fnciosed you c��ill find three applications related to the proposed Los Amigos patio. As we
d�sc�i�sse� iast �ueek, it is our intention to address zoning issues related to the patio with the
creatic>>1 of the Sici Base/Recreation II zone district. The follo«�ing applications and supporting
m�.'e:��.:' :�a�e be��n submitted:
1) A request to amend the Town of Vail Zoning Code to create the Ski Base/Recreation
Zone District.
�lalerial submitted consists of an application form and a complete draft of the proposed
zone ��I�1T'ILC.
2j A reque�i to re-zone a portion of Tract E to Ski Base/Recreation Zone District.
St;bmittal material inclucles an application form signed by Vail Assoc;iates, Inc., a«ritten
description of the request, a legal description of the area to be rezoned, and a site plan
indicating th�.area to be re-zoned and the relationship of the area to surrounding paicels.
3, � rPqiiest !�ar a c�>nditional use pPrmit for Los Amigos to construct and operate an
outdoor dinin�pat«�on the parcel to be re-zoned.
Subr=.�ittal material inc(udes an application form signed by Vail Associates, Inc., a�-ritten
description of the request, a site plan of the proposed dining patio and a cross-
secCion/elevaCion of the patio.
In addition to the above, the proposed Slci Base/Recreation zone district calls for the submittal of
a d:��elopment plan prior to initiatir�g any development. In anticipation of this provision being
incluaed as a i-equirement of this district, a title report for tract E are also submitteci. Other
requir:ments outlined in the development plan section are addressed by the Golden Peak House
recievelopment submittal. A sur��e�_i icating the area to be re-zoned ���ill be completed and
si�brr.•ilte�� during the week December 1 lth. T
Suite 204,Vail National Bank Building
108 South Frontage Road West • Vail,Colorado 81657 • (303)476-7154
. • � � �
{-��� � c� �9�2
In order for the patio proposal to be reviewed as an element of the Golden Peak submittal, it is
our intention that these three applications be reviewed concurrently beginning with the January
(��4� PEC meeting. We understand that there are logistics issues with the concurrent review of
`I�'iese requests, but we would hope that the PEC's review of the conditional use permit could be
made conditional upon the adoption of the Ski Base/Rec II district and the rezoning of this
parcel.
We appreciate 5-our quick respanse following the December 7th worksession and look for«�ard
to working with you on the re��iew of this proposal. We realize the complexity of this project
and are prepared to provide any assistance ���e can to facilitate your review of these requests.
Plea�se do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may� have.
Sincerely,
� _�
C_ \ �.ti `� ---
Thomas A. Braun, AICP
� �� �
r.w.e,a,yax
Petition Date De c. 14 , 19 9 2
PETITION FORM FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OR
REQUEST FOR
A CHANGE IN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
I. This procedure is required for any amendment to the zoning ordinance or for a request
for a district boundary change.
A. NAME OF PETITIONER Ron Rilev
ADDRESS 228 Bridge Street Vail , Co PHONE476-4150
B. NAME OF PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATIVE Peter Jamar Associates
ADDRESS 108 S. Frontage Road West PHONE476-7154
C. NAME OF OWNER (p�int or type) N/A
" SIGNATURE
ADDRESS PHONE
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
ADDRESS N/A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK FILING
E. FEE: Zoning Amendments: $250.00 Rezo�ings: $200.00
PAID � � CHECK # �ATE --�
F. �tamped, addres$ed er�veiopes and iis� �f �ne n�in�s ofi owners �f a(( pr�periy
adjacent to the subject property.
II. Four (4) copies of the following information:
A. The petition shall include a summary of the proposed revision of the
regulations, or a complete description of the proposed changes in disctrict
boundaries and a map indicating the existing and proposed disctrict boundaries.
Applicant must submit written and/or graphic materials stating the reasons for
request.
111. Time Requirements
The Planning and Environmental Comission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of
each month. A petition with the necessary accompanying material must be submitted
four weeks prior to the date of the meeting. Following the Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting, all amendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary
change must go tot the Town Council for final action.
tV. Your proposal will be reviewed for complainaoQ with Vail's Comprehensive Plan.
V. If this application requires a separate review by any local, State or Federal agency
other than the Town of Vail, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00.
Examples of such review, may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Department of
Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess �
of 50% of the application fee. If, at the applicanYs request, any matter is postponed for
hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, then the entire fee for such re-
, �
� � . . .
hearing, causing the matter to be re-published. then the entire fee for such re-
publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have significant
design, land use or other issues which may have a significant impact on the
community may require review by consultants other than town staff. Should a
determination be made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any application, the Community Development Department may hire an outside
consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and this
amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time he files his
application with the Community Development Department. Upon completion of the
review of the application by the consultant, any of the funds forvvarded by the applicant
for payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the consultant shall be
retumed to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount
forwarded by the application shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days
of notification by the Town.
�
� � � �
A request to amend the Vail Municipal Code to establish the
Ski Base/Recreation II Zone District
BACKGROUND ON THE SKI BASE/REC ZONE DISTRICT
The Ski Base/Recreation district was adopted in 1983 to facilitate the redevelopment of the Golden
Peak Base Facility. A fundamental problem with this district is that it is written specifically for the
Golden Peak site and surrounding neighborhood. Because of this specificity, the zone district can
not be used on other property. This is contrary to the basic concept of Euclidean zoning - that a
zone district should establish a framework for guiding development that is applicable to any
number of parcels. As presently written, the Ski Base/Rec district is essentially a special
development district for the Golden Peak site.
In 1991, the Town of Vail commissioned a comprehensive evaluation of the zoning code and
related development guidelines. The product of this effort, the Development Code Revision
Report, recommended that a new district, Ski Base/Recreation II be adopted. In addition to
addressing problems with the existing Ski Base/Recreation district, the creation of this district is
also a step toward implementing recommendations of the Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail Village
Master Plan. Both of these documents recommend Ski Base/Recreation land use classifications for
areas of the Town located at the base of Vail Mountain.
The proposed Ski Base/Recreation II district was modeled after the eaisting Ski Base/Recreation
district, but is written in more general terms in order to be applicable to other areas of the Town.
The proposed district also closely resembles the draft presented in the Development Code Revision
Report.
SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED SKI BASE/REC RECREATION II DISTRICT
As proposed, the basic concept of the new Ski Base/Rec II district is very similar to the existing
Ski Base/Rec district. For example, uses will be oriented toward skiing, recreation and related
activities. Residential uses will not be permitted in Ski Base/Rec II. Two steps have been taken to
ensure adequate review of all development and uses in Ski Base/Rec II. First, there are no
permitted uses, all uses in Ski Base/Rec II are conditional uses. Secondly, a development plan
will be required prior to initiating any development in the district. The purpose of the development
plan is much the same as a Special Development District by designating building locations, site
access and site improvements and other features of the development. As with the SDD process and
the existing Ski Base/Rec district, the approved development plan will establish all site
development standards such as minimum lot size, setbacks, building height, landscaping and site
coverage.
The following outlines the proposed Ski Base/Recreation II zone district.
�..n.-, r,-n , �f��l� .
1
. ; , • •
18.39.010 Purpose
The Ski Base/Rec II district is intended to provide sites for base facilities necessary for providing
skier services that facilitate the operation of the ski mountain. In addition, summer recreational
uses and facilities are appropriate in order to encourage the year-around use of facilities within the
district. The Ski Base/Rec district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other
amenities appropriate to the uses and development permitted in the district.
18.39.050 Conditional uses
The following conditional uses shall be permitted in the Ski Base/Recreation II district subject to
the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 18.60:
1. Ski locker and basket rental;
2. Employee locker rooms;
3. Ski school facilities and activities;
4. Ski patrol facilities;
5. Ski repair, rental, sales and accessories;
6. Ski racing facilities;
7. Ski trails, slopes and lifts;
8. Snowmaking facilities;
9. Lift ticket sales;
10. Restaurant, bar, snack bar;
11. Food and beverage service, indoor or outdoor cart vending;
12. Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and
drinking establishments;
13. Seasonal Town of Vail or Vail Recreation District recreation offices;
14. Recreation room, minor arcade
15. Seasonal structures to accommodate athletic, cultural or educational
activities;
16. Bus and skier dropoff facilities
17. Additional skiing and recreation related uses determined to be similar to
conditional uses and the purpose of this chapter, in accordance with the
provisions of section 18.66.040.
18.39.070 Accessory uses
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Ski Base/Rec II district:
A. Accessory uses customarily incidental to conditional uses and necessary for
the operation thereof.
18.39.080 Location of business activity
All business activity and uses permitted in the Ski Base/Recreation district shall be operated and
conducted within a building, unless specifically authorized by a conditional use permit to be
conducted outdoors.
2
, . '• , • •
18.39.090 Development plan required
A. In order to establish development standards, ensure unified development and compatibility
with surrounding uses, protect the natural environment, and to ensure that development is
consistent with the purpose of the Ski Base/Rec II district, an approved development plan
shall be required prior to site preparation, building construction or other improvements to
land within the Ski BaseJRec II district. The approved development plan shall be used as
the principal guide for all development and improvements in the district.
B. A proposed development plan may be submitted by the owner(s) of property to be included
in the development plan, or his (her) authorized representative or agent. In addition to the
material listed in section 1839.110, the application shall include:
l. Written consent of the owners of all property to be included in the
development plan, or their agents or authorized representatives;
2. A legal description of the property to be included in the development plan;
3. A list of all owners of property located adjacent to the subject parcel. Said
names and addresses shall be derived from the current tax records of Eagle
County as they appeared no more than sixty days prior to the date of the
scheduled public hearing. The owners list shall include the name of all
owners, their mailing address, and a general description of the property
owned by each.
C. Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the proposed development plan in
accordance with the provisions of sections 18.66.070 through 18.66.100 .
D. Minor amendments to an approved development plan which do not change its substance
may be approved by the Department of Community Development. All other amendments
to an approved development plan shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental
Commission in accordance with the provisions of sections 18.66.070 through 18.66.100.
18.39.110 Development plan-contents
The following information and materials shall be submitted with an application for a proposed
development plan. Certain submittal requirements may be waived or modified by the director of
the Department of Community Development if it is demonstrated that the material to be waived or
modified is not applicable to review criteria, or that other practical solutions have been reached.
A. Application form and filing fee.
B. A written statement describing the project to include information on the nature of the
development proposed, proposed uses, and phasing plans.
C. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions of the property to
be included in the development plan, to include the location of improvements, existing
contours, natural features, existing vegetation, water courses, and perimeter property lines
of the parcel.
D. A title report, including schedule A and B.
E. Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations, etc.), if
applicable.
F. A complete zoning analysis of existing and proposed development to include a square
footage analysis of all proposed uses, parking spaces, etc.
G. A site plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing the location and dimensions of all
existing and proposed buildings and structures, all principal site development features,
vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, proposed contours and preliminary drainage
plans.
3
, • �
H. Preliminary building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than 1/8" _
1', in sufficient detail to determine floor area, circulation, location of uses, and general
scale and appearance of the proposed development.
I. A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in relation to all adjacent
properties at a scale not smaller than 1" = 50'.
J. Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating the visual
impact of the proposed development on public and private property in the vicinity of the
proposed development plan.
K. An architectural or massing model at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed development
in relationship to existing development on the site and on adjacent parcels.
L. A preliminary landscape plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing existing
landscape features to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and other site
development features such as recreation facilities, paths and trails, plazas, walkways and
water features.
M. An environmental impact report in accordance with Chapter 18.56, hereof unless waived
by section 18.56.030.
N. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Director of the
Community Development Department.
With the exception of the model, four complete copies of the above information shall be submitted
at the time of application. When a model is required, it shall be submitted a minimum of two
weeks priar to the first formal review by the Planning and Environmental Commission. At the
discretion of the Director of Community Development, reduced copies in 8.5" x 11" format of all
of the above information and additional copies for distribution to the Planning and Environmental
Commission and Town Council may be required.
18.39.120 Design standards/criteria for evaluation
The following design criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating a proposed
development plan. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed
development plan complies with all applicable design criteria.
1. Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale, massing and orientation is
compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood.
2. Buildings, improvements, uses and activities are designed and located to produce a
functional development plan responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and
uses, and the community as a whole.
3. Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, are designed to preserve and
enhance the natural features of the site, maximize opportunities for access and use by the
public, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas.
4. A pedestrian and vehicular circulation system designed to provide safe, efficient and
aesthetically pleasing circulation to the site and throughout the development.
5. Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's
environmental impact report and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a
part of the proposed development plan.
18.39.130 Lot area
Minimum lot or site area in the Ski Base/Recreation II district shall be as indicated on the approved
development plan.
4
� `. , • �
18.39.150 Setbacks
Minimum setbacks in the Ski Base/Recreation II district shall be as indicated on the approved
development plan.
18.39.170 Height
Maximum building heights in the Ski Base/Recreation II district shall be as indicated on the
approved development plan.
18.39.190 Site coverage
MaYimum site coverage in the Ski Base/Recreation II district shall be as indicated on the approved
development plan.
18.39.210 Landscaping and site development
Minimum landscaped areas in the Ski Base/Recreation II district shall be as indicated on the
approved development plan.
18.39.230 Parking
Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52. When required
parking is provided on-site, at least seventy-five percent of the required parking shall be located
within the main building or buildings.
18.39.24 (new section)
Additional regulations pertaining to site development standards and the development of land in the
Ski Base/Rec II district are found in chapter 18.58, Supplemental Regulations.
5
. • •
�,�� REC'B DEC 1 41992
Petition Date Dec. 14 . � 9�2
PETITION FORM FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OR
REOUEST FOR
A CHANGE IN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
I. This proc;edure is required for any amendment to the zoning ordinance or for a request
for a district boundary change.
A. NAME OF PETITIONER Rc,n R; � P�
ADDRESS 228 Bridae Street vai � � �n PHONE 4?�150
B. NAME OF PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATIVE Peter ,7amar Associates
ADDRESS 108 S. Frontacte Road w. PHONE 476-7154
C. NAME OF OWNER ri or type) Vail Associates Inc.
" SIGNATURE �-�C��.
ADDRESS P.o. Box 7 vail , CO PHONE 476-5601
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
ADDRESS A portion of tract E, Vail Village
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK FILING S t h
E. FEE: Zoning Amendments: $250.00 Rezonings: $200.00
PAID CHECK # DATE
F. Stamped, addressed envelopes and list of the names of owners of all property
adjacent to the subject property.
II. Four (4) copies of the following information:
A. The petition shall include a summary of the proposed revision of the
regulations, or a complete description of the proposed changes in disctrict
boundaries and a map indicating the existing and proposed disc:rict boundaries.
Applicant must submit written and/or graphic materials stating the reasons for
request.
111. Time Requirements
The Planning and Environmental Comission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of
each month. A petition with the necessary accompanying material must be submitted
iou� weeics prinr io the �at�; ofi i�� meeiing. Fo!lov��ing ti�e ��ianning and tnvirorime��iai
Commission meeting, all amendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary
change must go tot the Town Council for final action.
tV. Your proposal will be reviewed for complainace with Vail's Comprehensive Plan.
V. If this application requires a separate review by any local, State or Federal agency
other than the Town of Vail, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00.
Examples of such review, may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Department of
Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess
of 50% of the application fee. If, at the applicant's request, any matter is postponed for
hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, then the entire fee for such re-
� �
hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, then the entire fee for such re-
publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have significant
design, land use or other issues which may have a significant impact on the
community may require review by consultants other than town staff. Should a
determination be made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any application, the Community Development Department may hire an outside
consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and this
amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time he �iles his
application with the Community Development Department. Upon completion of the
review of the a�lication by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded by the applicant
for payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the consultant shall be
retumed to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount
forwarded by the application shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days
of notification by the Town.
� • •
A request to re-zone a portion of Tract E, Vail Village
Fifth Filing to the Ski Base/Recreation II Zone District
This application is to re-zone a portion of Tract E, Vail Village Sth Filing from Agricultural/Open
Space to Ski Base/Recreation II. The following information outlines the purpose of this re-zoning,
a description of the proposed change to district boundaries, and the relationship of this request to
the Town of Vail Comprehensive plan.
PURPOSE FOR THIS REZONING
This re-zoning is proposed in order to facilitate the development of an outdoor dining patio at the
Los Amigos restaurant. The proposed patio is an element of the Golden Peak House
redevelopment currently under review by the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town
Council. As described below, the re-zoning also serves to implement the recommendations of the
Vail Land Use Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan.
DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE RE-ZONED
The area to be re-zoned is a portion of Tract E, Vail Village Fifth Filing, located adjacent to the
Golden Peak House site at the base of Vail Mountain. The parcel to be re-zoned encompasses an
area slightly larger than the proposed dining patio (refer to the accompanying Conditional Use
application). A legal description of the parcel is as follows:
That part of Tract E, Vail Village Fifth Filing, according to the map thereof recorded
in the office of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as
follows:
Beginning at the NW 1/16 corner of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 West
of the Sixth Principal Meridian, said point also being the northwesterly corner of
said Tract E; thence N89° 44'00"E 16.00 feet, along the northerly line of said Tract
E; thence, departing said northerly line, S00°16'00"E 84.00 feet; to the True Point
of Beginning; thence N89°44'00"84 feet; thence N31°42'35"E 5.66 feet; thence
N59°45'00"E 8.08 feet; thence S00°16'00"E 26.84 feet; thence S89°44'00"W
94.00 feet; thence N00°16'00"W 18.00 feet, to the True Point of Beginning,
containing 1,746 square feet, more or less.
This legal description has been prepared by Eagle Valley Surveying. A copy of this description
has also been submitted. A graphic illustration of this area will be prepared and submitted within
the coming week.
RELATIONSHIP TO THE TOWN OF VAIL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
In 1986, the Vail Land Use Plan was formally adopted by the Town of Vail. A major element of
this plan are"Proposed Land Uses". Among the land use categories proposed in this plan is a Ski
Base category. The stated purpose of this category is "Ski trails and facilities related to a ski base
are included in this category". The Vail Land Use Map designates four areas as Ski Base. Each of
these areas are located adjacent to Vail Mountain and include Golden Peak, Vail Village, Lionshead
and Cascade Village.
1
, • �
A planning process for Vail Village was initiated at about the same time the Land Use plan was
finalized. The Vail Village Master Plan process provided a much more detailed analysis of the
Village area than occurred with the Land Use Plan. As such, the Land Use Plan deals with the
Village area by formally referencing the land use component of the Village Master Plan. Included
in this area is the Golden Peak House site and other areas adjacent to Vail Mountain (including the
parcel described above).
The Vail Village Master Plan includes a land use category referred to as Ski Base/Recreation.
Areas designated Ski Base/Recreation include the Golden Peak area and the area immediately
adjacent to Vail Village and the Golden Peak House at the base of Vail Mountain. Please refer to
the accompanying map and text from the Village Master Plan.
The request to re-zone this parcel to Ski Base/Recreation II will result in the zoning of this parcel
being consistent with the Ski Base/Recreation land use designation. As such, this proposal
represents an important step toward implementing the Vail Village Master Plan.
2
. _ , _ . • •
. r
' revised 10/5/92 lREC i;��� E Y t9��.
' Date of Application D . � 4 . � 2
Date of PEC Meeting
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT
I . This procedure is required for any project required to obtain a
conditional use permit .
The application will not be accepted until all information is
submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT Ron Ri7P�
ADDRESS 228 Bridqe Street Vail , Co
'r:TONE 47ti- a� 5n
B. NAME OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE Peter Jamar Associates
ADDRESS 108 S. Frontaqe Road W.
PHONE 47h-7154
C. NAME OF OWNER(S) (print ype) Vail Associates Inc.
OWNER(S) SIGNATIIRE(S) --
ADDRESS P.O. Box 7 ail , CO
PH_:.-
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL:LOT BLOCK FILING 5th
ADDRESS_ _A portion of tract E, Vail Village
� .
E. FEE $200 . 00 PAID , � ;. CK # ' ` BY `-�-
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY , `-
DEVELOPMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. Stamped, addressed envelopes of the names of owners of all
property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY
BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a list of names and mailing
addresses . THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT
OWNERS AND CORRECT ADDRESSES .
II . PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A pre-application conference with a planning staff inember is
strongly suggested to determine if any additional information is
needed. No application will be accepted unless it complete (must
include all items required by the zoning administratcr) . It is
the applicant' s responsibility to make an appointment with the
staff to find out about additional submittal requirements .
III . PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE
APPROVAL PROCESS FOR '�'�UR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST
BE COMPLIED �?ITH BF,FOR.E A RUILDING PERMIT TS ISSUED,
Four (4) copies of the following information must be
submitted:
1 . A description of the precise nature of the proposed use
and its operating characteristics and measures proposed
to make the use compatible with other properties in the
vicinity.
The description must also address :
a. Relationship and impact of the use on development
objectives of the Town.
1
� - —_ _ ----_ --__ _ - --- — _ _ _
b. T`fect of the use on light � � air, distribut�on �.
....� population, transportatic.�.. facilities, • " • - �
utilities, schools, parks and recreation , �� �
facilities, and other public facilities and public '
facilities needs . ,
c . Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to
congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and
convenience, traffic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and removal of snow from the
streets and parking area.
d. Effect upon the character of the area in which the
proposed use is to be located, including the scale
and bulk of the proposed use in relation to
surrounding uses .
2 . A site plan at a scale of at least 1" = 20' showing
proposed development of the site, including topography,
building locations, parking, traffic circulation,
useable open space, landscaped areas and utilities and
drainage features .
3 . Preliminary building elevations and floor plans .
4 . A title report to verify ownership and easements .
5 . If the building is condominiumized, a letter from the
condominium association in support of the proposal must
be submitted to staff.
6 . Any additional material necessary for the review of the
application as determined by the zoning administrator.
** For interior modifications, an improvement survey
and site plan may be waived by the zoning
administrator.
IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS
A. The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd
and 4th Mondays of each month. A complete application form
and all accompanying material (as described above) must be
submitted a minimum of four (4) weeks prior to the date of
the PEC public hearing. No incomplete applications (as
determined by the zoning administrator) will be accepted by
the planning staff before or after the designated submittal
date .
B. All PEC approved conditional use permits shall lapse if
construction is not commenced within one year of the date of
approval and diligently pursued to completion, or if the use
for which the approval is granted is not commenced within
one year .
V. A. If this application requires a separate review by any local,
State or Federal agency other than the Town of Vail, the
application fee shall be increased by $200 . 00 . Examples of
such review, may include, but are not limited to : Colorado
Department of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of
Engineers 404, etc.
B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing
fees which are in excess of 50°s of the application fee . If,
at the applicant' s request, any matter is postponed for
hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, then, the
entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the
applicant .
2
� - • -� C. Applicatio�deemed by the Community Da.r+'elopment Department
to have significant design, land use or other issues which
1 may have a significant impact on the community may require
� review by consultants other that town staff. Should a
determination be made by the town staff that an outside
consultant is needed to review any application, Community
Development may hire an outside consultant, it shall
estimate the amount of money necessary }o pay him or her and
this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant
at the time he files his application with the Community
Development Department . Upon completion of the review of
the application by the consultant, any of the funds
forwarded by the applicant for payment of the consultant
which have not been paid to the consultant shall be returned
to the applicant . Expenses incurred by the Town in excess
of the amount forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to
the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by
the Town.
3
�
• • •
A request for a Conditional Use Permit to
construct and operate an outdoor dining patio on a portion
of Tract E, Vail Village Fifth Filing
In accordance with the Ski Base/Recreation II zone district, "outdoor dining areas operated in
conjunction with permitted eating and drinking establishments" are permitted subject to the
approval of a conditional use permit. This application is for a Conditional Use permit in order to
construct and operate an outdoor dining patio in conjunction with the Los Amigos restaurant in the
Golden Peak House building. The following information provides a description of the proposed
patio and the relationship of the patio to applicable review criteria.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PATIO
The outdoor patio is proposed as an element of the Golden Peak House redevelopment. The deck
will be operated by Los Amigos Restaurant and will be located immediately adjacent to the
restaurant on the south side of the building. The deck �vill be located on land owned by Vail
Associates, Inc. (VAI). Los Amigos and VAI are currently in the process of negotiating an
arrangement far the operation of the patio.
The proposed patio is very similar in size to the existing Los Amigos patio. The existing patio is
approximately 80' long and varies in width from 10 to 16 feet. The interior dimensions of the
proposed patio are approximately 80 feet long and 15 and one-half feet wide. The general location
and dimensions of the proposed patio are indicated on the accompanying Golden Peak House site
plan.
As proposed, the patio will essentially be located on grade. Pedestrian access will be provided by
two entry points, one on the west end of the patio and one on the east end. The design of the patio
will be a dramatic improvement over the e�:isting patio. The surface of the patio will be constructed
of interlocking pavers. The patio will be defined by a stucco wall and wood railing.
RELATIONSHIP TO TOWN CRITERIA
The following four criteria are used to evaluate conditional use requests.
A. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town.
Located at the base of Vail Mountain, an outdoor dining patio is an integral aspect of the
skier experience. This skier related activity is also a furtherance of the Vail Village Master
Plan, a document that designated this area of the Village as "Ski Base/Recreation".
1
' • ` w • •
B. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities,
utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public
facilities needs.
There are no impacts to the above referenced factors.
C. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian
safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of
snow from the streets and parking area.
There are no impacts from the proposed use on automotive traffic, traffic flow and control,
and snow removal. The relationship of the proposed deck and the operation of Vail
Mountain, particularly during special events such as World Cup races, has been discussed
with Vail Associates, Inc. As properry owners, VAI will be directly involved in identifying
all potential issues related to this patio. VAI's position on the proposed patio will be
provided to the staff prior to the PEC review.
D. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including
the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses.
The proposed use is essentially the same as the dining patio that has been in place for many
years. Due to the on-grade location of the deck, there is no change or impact on
surrounding uses resulting from the scale and bulk of the proposed use.
2
� `�►
_ � �
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
Meeting Minutes
December 15, 1992
Present
Kristan Pritz
Mike Mollica
Tim Devlin
Clark Willingham
Craig Snowdon
The meeting began with a discussion regarding the number of employee housing units that
would be required to be provided for the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House. A
preliminary analysis completed by Town of Vail staff determined that an additional 25
employees would be generated by the proposed increase in floor area. The formula used by
the Town results in 2-4 employee housing units. (Please see pages 14-15 of the staff
memorandum to the PEC for this project, dated 12-7-92 for further explanation).
Both Clark and Craig disagreed that 25 new employees would be generated by the proposal,
and the staff agreed to take a look at the employee numbers that will be calculated by the
applicant. The area for the Los Amigos Restaurant expansion (lower level) will be re-
examined and the numbers revised accordingly. Craig added that the cost of a 2-bedroom in
Pitkin Creek averages about $115,000.00. Clark explained the economics of the
redevelopment and stated that his goal for the project was to more or less break even and to
end up with a dwelling unit in the Golden Peak House. He also explained the need to gain
approval for the project as soon as possible after the New Year so construction could
commence in April, 1993. He explained that he would have to pay all of the commercial rent
for the tenants in the building during the construction period. He estimated that the residential
space would be vacant from 4/1/93 until at least March 1994, a "sacrifice" that the owners
were willing to make to redevelop the project. Clark also explained that his negotiations with
VA for the exchange of part of Tract E for the area under the Los Amigos deck was "costing"
him $373,000.00, the value of the commercial space beneath the deck.
The staff expressed their concerns with the project as proposed, and recommended some
modifications that needed to be made by the applicant to increase the likelihood of gaining the
support of the staff. These recommendations included: removing all of the floor area that
would be built into what is now the Tract E easement; eliminating as much of the proposed
fifth floor as possible; "clipping" the ridge peaks to decrease the building height, which was
done on the Sonnenalp and Christiania; and maintaining landscaping on the west side (skier
access) of the building. The staff stated that they were willing to consider looking at adding
floor area on the front of the building above the proposed arcade to compensate for some of
the floor area removed from other parts of the building. These floor area additions would have
r -.
, ! `
to be located completely on the applicanYs properry. The staff atso felt that the overall GRFA
and square footage of the project should be reduced.
Clark asked the staff that if he did all of the things that the staff was recommending, would
they support the project. Staff responded by stating that their support was more likely to be
gained if the applicant would modify his proposal to incorporate their suggestions, but that the
staff would have to take a close look at all of the issues (i.e. view corridor encroachment, etc.)
before a final decision would be made on whether or not to support the proposal.
Some other issues raised by the staff were the improvements that the Town would like to see
as part of this project, including Seibert Circle, improved skier access to Vail Mountain,
drainage upgrades, and employee housing.
The meeting concluded with a discussion regarding the scheduling of the Planning
Commission meetings for the project. It was agreed that the January 11, 1993 PEC meeting
would be used as a work session to review the modifications to the proposal. Craig agreed to
have the revised drawings and perhaps a massing model to the staff as soon as possible.
Also, photo overlays would be completed by the applicant as soon as possible and would
show the existing building and the proposed building. Additional view corridor information is
also needed.
� -+w
� �
• ' ���
� �
OP
Y
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
December 14, 1992
Present Staff Present
Diana Donovan Kristan Pritz
Jeff Bowen Mike Mollica
Dalton Williams Andy Knudtsen
Greg Amsden Shelly Mello
Kathy Langenwalter Tim Devlin
Chuck Crist Russ Forrest
Gena Whitten (for items 4-8)
1. The Planning and Environmental Commission was called to order at 1:00 P.M. to hold
a work session to discuss a request for the establishment of a Special Development
District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change and an
amendment to View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch
Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
Kristan Pritz reviewed the staff's concerns and the main points for discussion during
the work session as follows:
1. Pull all floor area out of overhangs and deck easements.
2. Keep deck open at Los Amigos.
3. At a minimum pull back the corner of the fifth floor (to lower front area of
building below the existing roof line on Bridge Street).
4. Landscape skier access to Vista Bahn. �
Mike Mollica reviewed the preliminary cost estimates for certain improvements adjacent
to the Golden Peak House:
1. Seibert Circle Streetscape = $180,000.00
2. Skier Access Streetscape = $52,000.00
3. Correct major drainage problem from mountain run-off behind Golden Peak
House = $36,500.00 at 25% of total = $9,125.00
Craig Snowdon, the project architect, introduced Clark Willingham, the applicant for the
redevelopment of the Golden Peak House who reviewed the history of the project.
Clark also reviewed the economics of the project stating that the 1.6 million dollars in
1
+' v M
� �
costs would produce very little, if any profit. Clark further explained his reason for
needing the View Corridor encroachment. Clark demonstrated his economic situation
by way of a humorous anecdote:
A scientist decided to experiment with a frog, and while taking notes, the scientist put
the frog on the ground and said "jump frog jump". The frog jumped four feet. The
scientist wrote down that the frog jumped four feet. The scientist then cut off one leg
and said "Jump frog jump." The three legged frog jumped three feet. The scientist
then cut off another leg and said "Jump frog, jump." The two legged frog jumped two
feet. After noting this, the scientist cut off one more leg and said, "Jump, frog, jump."
The one legged frog jumped one foot. The scientist noted this, and cut off the frog's
last leg and said, "Jump, frog, jump." "Jump, frog, jump!" The frog did not jump, so
the scientist duly noted that the no legged frog was deaf. This anecdote was to
represent that Clark could not respond any more for the Town and Clark stated that
what was being asked was too much and that the improvements to the building for
code corrections, drainage, the streetscape improvements, employee housing, etc.,
totalled 1.6 million dollars.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she did not want further encroachment into the View
Corridor.
Dalton Williams agreed with Kathy that further encroachment was not necessary and
that the proposed bulk and mass of the building needed needs to be cut back to meet
the criteria of the Vail Village Master Plan.
The Planning and Environmental Commission asked for comments to be made on
each issue as raised. The first issue discussed was the height of the building, being
raised approximately 4 to 6 feet.
Jim Lamont stated that he represented 40 persons (the East Village Homeowner's
Association) and that they did not want the roof raised.
Roslin Valentine asked about trees that grow into the view corridor and what happens
to them. She was answered by the Board that nothing happens to the trees, that they
are allowed to grow into the view corridor.
Rod Slifer stated that he does not want further encroachment into the View Corridor.
Jeff Bowen said that the building is too big for the site and violates the Vail Village
Master Plan. He further stated that the issue is not just loosing the view of Riva Ridge.
He summarized that the proposed fourth and fifth floors were a concern.
Dalton Williams said that the view of Riva Ridge is a holy issue and that the subject is
of a delicate nature with the Red Lion and other developments. He stated that it may
be negotiable, however too much is being asked for.
Kristan Pritz encouraged the PEC to look at all aspects of the project instead of each
issue individually.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - 12-14-92 2
.:� s
• •
Chuck Crist said that the encroachment into the view corridor from the Village parking
structure was not an issue for him. He explained that the existing Golden Peak House
"is funky and that tourists remember the funk of Vail and that some funk is necessary."
Chuck said that the developers "are not building a Bavarian wedding cake."
Diana Donovan agreed with Chuck, and Kathy Langenwalter agreed as well.
The next issue discussed was the skier access. Clark stated that he is opening up the
access with no trees proposed, however lots of flower boxes were to be added to the
building.
Dalton Williams said that tourists would prefer the proposed design with no trees,
lighted windows, and flowers. Dalton referenced the other accesses being wide and
open and decorative and said that the present access is dark and gloomy.
Kathy Langenwalter said that she is also not concerned with the trees in the skier
access but does not want the width of the access to be any narrower.
Diana Donovan said that she would like some landscaping for softening of the building.
Jeff Bowen said that it is important to open up the area.
Dalton Williams agreed with Jeff Bowen.
Chuck Crist said that he would like to see "an overdose of flower boxes."
Clark felt that pavers were inappropriate for snow removal but does not have a
problem with installing pavers. Clark said that he does have a problem with
redesigning the entire drainage on Tract E.
Ron Riley stated that he would be making an application for the creation of a new Ski
Base/Recreation II Zone District to make the dining deck 15' wide.
Jim Lamont asked to clarify the application that Ron Riley was making.
Jack Curtin stated that he and Mrs. Hill were opposed to the dining deck expansion.
Dalton Williams said that he was 100% opposed to the proposal beyond the property
line. He further said the building is too massive and does not comply with the existing
zoning. He stated that if he were to approve the proposal, he could not sleep at night.
Jeff Bowen agreed with Dalton Williams.
Ron Riley said Vail Associates researched the ski base run-out area and that Vail
Associates was comfortable with a 35' deck.
Diana Donovan said that she had a problem with Tract E. She said that she would like
to see Tract E donated to the Town as permanent open space if a deck is allowed to
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - 12-14-92 3
.� �r
• s
encroach into this area.
Chuck Crist said that he had no problem with the deck and added that it would be
better if the building was pulled back from the west.
Kathy Langenwalter said that she has no problem with the deck on property that the
Golden Peak House owns but cannot support a deck beyond the Golden Peak House
property boundary.
Greg Amsden said that some relief is needed on the Bridge Street elevation and the
building needs to be reduced in height or pulled back. He felt that the square footage
translates to GRFA.
Dalton Williams agreed with Greg Amsden. He said that the gable on the west side
needs to be taken off, the front of the building should step back and one floor needs to
be taken off.
Chuck Crist agreed with Greg Amsden.
Jim Lamont said he was concerned with the language of the ordinance and the
covenants of Tract E.
2. The Public Hearing skipped the originally scheduled items #2 and #3 to accommodate
Dr. Kandell, who needed to catch an airplane.
A request for setback variances to allow construction of a deck at the Kandell
residence, 4259 Nugget Lane East, Lot 2, Bighorn Estates Resubdivision of Lots 10
and 11.
Applicant: Bob Kandell
Planner: Tim Devlin
Tim Devlin reviewed the setback requests with the PEC, explaining that the applicant
was requesting relief from the side and Gore Creek setback requirements in order to
allow for deck expansion with hot tub. The deck expansion and hot tub had been
constructed without a building permit and without Town approval. The specific request
was to encroach 15 feet and 12.5 feet into the west and east setbacks, respectively;
7.5 feet is the allowed encroachment for decks located within 5 feet (or less) above
ground level. Also, the applicant was requesting to encroach 21 feet into the Gore
Creek setback; 10 feet is the allowed encroachment into this setback. The staff
supported the side setback variance request but recommended denial of the Gore
Creek setback variance request. A recommended condition of the side setback
approval was that the applicant plant five evergreen trees, 10 feet in height on the east
side of the deck to screen it from view of the neighbor to the east (McCue residence).
Dr. Kandell explained to the PEC that his site was uniquely constrained by both the
narrow configuration of the lot and by the 50 foot setback requirement from Gore
Creek. He also explained that the deck was built larger than he had anticipated, and
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - 12-14-92 4
' t� � �
�es�q��� --♦ �{�v(.t � — �,ek�� c.�-�.-�p s �
'� �
�, C,cwf-�:,` �U�.,f� � a.�Gi� 7 -
�op�dcn PeaIC l�ovte
� • � / i��� r� '.e""'_" � 'r-� '��uz� - `i�,� '�G.e� ;�
(O
�
r�G G�-c�B � � i/� � �r
. , � G(/ � ` i
u� !� .�P � �,.� � �u �..,:� ? i
' ��,��` �-�2 �� �z°-r.�.. �— 2 `� � �-- �� , 7
�� G��� .
�-�-'� �� a�- ����. G�— � o-t G2Fa4 ,
�
�G��
w.�,.o-�a,--- � �.°�. G� a�=�-� a-�-u.� �S ,
_ fi^�- � ��.G.l
_ __ � �'o� �� E�'-�'�
� R� a��e�.--e� ���C �i9� = � �� ,�,-, ,����at� �z
�j S�.e�-ee — �I� S ��' G� � 2�3
O �� �` �` — ��%�� �2� �fz Fi4 �.,.,
3 "� � 'q ��. G� .
� � � � .�..�.
�� � I�9Z 4�,
fi'
.�.c��a,.-�.e .�o� � GI/a�►�. L�/sr,e.Q .?.:
V 5 �S�s ,2►�rrw ��- /�` ��
� �
��`� 'l,�`� ` �� -/7
�� .�-o�� = �` ` a-� /5'/2 r
� �.By�i- G� /y�:�`-.�-� l l8'8'
' ��
" � i
�2 ' �9� 92 � ���z,.. t�� /��. - /��C l�v� S.e��
� �,�. s,�� �.�.�;�
. c� �,. _ ����
�c��s � (�z� o� � � •
, ���� �.-e _
s�; °�— = �,�,,,G:� �;�.-�;._-��
373,�
� � � � �°"' U�
�. -� �,��.r: - ,.�� ��� ��
x 7-goo,�� ^ " �,�,�,-�,� /S / ,
2 30,oar _ 2 Z-,�e,�.,,�-�/ / ���:s�e �/
-�-�A
� (l,�.e,� Co�.�,� � � ,r,��
(� R� R�=�e� ��h��. ,r,�,�, ,c�
� 5�. �i�eu�e. — �-�'` a.Q- �. o��, .�.�
Z '�%�'''�4U�'�-- /Y° �e� i/�:te%�44�r� �}JaG"� .
�G � ' -- --�'�.�� �� �°� �.��
��/ �c�-�' ,�a�.e �.
� -�- � �P� I��. � .
/
� ��- p�� �.�_ .�-� ,�,e, �. :,E�� d�� ��,�� ..
�-,,�-� � � �~�.�-� � /�` ,��� ��
��
��� �'�%� � ~ � . -
V A � �.�w h./ !^?.�... �-e��
! / � �"'�' l��e�
�. �c�-.,�� - ���_ � �� `��c.�z,�e,-,,� " ��..=.� -.
— �-C.u�: - �'�- - ND ,, _ ,f � T�� �.
,� F. �- T' ' %�.�-�° � .,d ?
� �� �
��� - ls' � �`°-�-��G Pr� a-� C � i�;G�
�
C.�.��r �' �e �4�.�-� S,�C,� �� �C.�. T�,
— �Z�l ey - V•v. �'1�. �� G�c,� �/ ,.� /
___
�
._ � • • �
--_.._' ��-�� G �� Z3�, tr�so
I ���._.�----- .
�►(.�oc��r G` —� T o 0
� �3 �l0 ✓��--��� --�_ ��9 G
_,o.r---�---�i
..a t-4.�`�I ��. 1�%
� �{�I�S� 'V�G..^�'- �o ��/�� 1//4.__��
I) /
���t °/ �
��
o � � � �����
�
'� s�� ����� . a.� �- �
�� �� -
�;
�'I
i� ,
i -7Q � 3'7 °-
'�
�;
�l � � .� � �C _ _
�:_
�'� ZI �5 � .
�� �
�.. T�� -� ���.
;! � � ! .�-
,i ��
' � �
`^�,. �Yr'
�� ''a"^�. `L°!�"�.
(� �
�
�:
1�I
I!
II
il � ���
�I�
I'� -�
il
��
I
�� � Z
�� 2ov,� - _
1
g ZZ
� �,lS'
. _ �t— _
i#' ► i � w� � � _ ,� --
iil 3 ,�� � o�
; � i �
� MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: December 7. 1992
SUBJECT: A request for a Joint work session with the Design Review Board and the
Planning and Environmental Commission to discuss the establishment of a
Special Development District, a Commercial Core I exterior aiteration request, a
minor subdivlsion request, a zone change request and a request for an
encroachment into View CoRidor No. 1 for the redevelopment of the Goiden
Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B and C� Blodc 2. Vail Village
First Filing.
Applicants: Goiden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
inc./GPH Partners. Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Deviin
. :.:.......... :.::�.;::::.�: ........:,.�,..:,,:. ...
.;;,:..;,.:,.
<:.:,:::::::;::;<::;>.. ....�::
>;:,.:<.;::>�::;:..:
..:::::.::::::.... :::......:. ... .. :...�.:. ,;.::..�;::.;,>;>:
,....... ::•:.:::.. ..•.:::.::::::..,:..;;,;:�:;;::.
,:::::;;:•;;::;:..:::.........:::::::::.,.:....,..•:::,;:.;:.::.;...:......... ...... ...........:::.�.,,.::::::::::.:�:..........::. ...,..:......,. :.::.•.... ..
<;:<
{v.C•YiL+fi.:��s.:ry::v�..u:••:x:::::�
•:.'J.•:w:::!ne.
.n:::::: w:..:�.•...4.
'i.:C:�:i�•i'iii:^i:ir.:.i:v:�i:::vL:i:.:::::�.
s::iii::::.�:n�:::n.....:.:.ii}:}ii+i?iii:i:n:::::.ii:.{ti::iY:i............::��ir'�ii:.i:i:n �::n ��ii::?::::n}v.y:vi
...:.::.:::.+f.v:�::::�.�:... ..:�:: . .......F.•:vv:n:.::::..+.•i:•ii}:�iiY.�ii}..v:ii:�i::i:.:::..
•::::::n�:.�::::.n:v:::�:::......:.......::.:::n........n...m::...;...:i.v'..::.. . .
' r::vY•:•.::::+•::{•v:2•................. ..r.....:..:::.�::::::...................:.......................r..I.................................. .......n
................................... x.....nr.r.n�. • r.............................................................................................:..:...:....
:x:::::::::::n�:A:::.:::::::::::::::::::.�:x:::::::::::::.�n_::Wi:ii}:::::ii..... ....................:m:::::::..:•... ............................................... . .......:.
:::::::::�::.�:.....:::••:::::::::::::::::.�:•::::..:::::::::::::.�:::•:::::•::•::.�::•::•:.�.f•:.:::::::,....:........................r.,.... ........................................:....:. ......................................................
{:::r::::{.n.y; . . rr........ n......::r••:::••::.�x:::.:.4:r.•:.....r.. .::rl rr�:::.:ry�:.:::.�::�:-:u.�:: ::rr �rrfi:..r.::...::.....::::�.:�.�::::::::::::::.::.::::�:�ii:i?i:i.i�::.:::�::::.::•::•.�::::::::::.::::::::::::::.
�:�.v.nviCiJ�iiiii:C�i:C+.1G''.w}i%'.�...... � ......... ..... t. . Y .:. ...r;......
rv .....................................:.::..... .:::::::::::..................
•• . • �wv.�hw:mvlw�n"vrv.VV�wwv/ri�iiiiiii'lH%4'l.v
I. PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The intent of this work session is to continue discussions between the Planning and
Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board, the staff and the applicants with regard
to the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House. Since the previous work session (October
26, 1992), the applicants have modified the Golden Peak House redevelopment proposal and
the staff has now analyzed the proposai with regard to the Town's development standards
(zoning issues).
To summarize the requests, the Community Development Department has received the
following applications concerning the redevelopment of the Goiden Peak House:
1. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District;
2. A request for a Commercial Core I exterior alteration;
3. A request to encroach into View Corridor No. 1;
4. A request to rezone a portion of Tract E (from Agricultural and Open Space to
Commercial Core I); and
5. A request for a minor subdivision, to incorporate the rezoned Tract E parcel into
the Golden Peak House parcel and to incorporate a portion of Lot C into the
Goiden Peak House parcel.
1
� � � � a
11. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS .
The Golden Peak House was originally constructed in 1966, and since ihat time there have
been only minor, cosmetic modifications made to the exterior of the structure. Generally, this
proposed redevelopment for the Goiden Peak House includes a renovation of the entire
buiiding. The architectural modifications include sloped roof forms, flat roof forms, the addition
of dorme�s, balconies, bay windows, and other architectural projections. Such modifications
include the addition of a new fourth floor (on the westem end of the stn�cture) and the addition
of a new fifth floor (on the eastem end). The entire existing "buttertly" roof form would be
removed, and gable roofs added. The proposed gable roof forms would have a 3:12 pitch.
Modifications proposed for the exterior of the structure will also facilitate the improvement, and
more efficient use� of the interior spaces. The existing center area of the building, commonly
called an arcade and generally used as common area/circulation, is not a very efficient use of
this interior space. With the redevelopment, the applicant is proposing to remove this entire
arcade area and to add a full basement beneath the structure. The common areas of the
building would be better defined to allow for a more efficient circulation system throughout the
structure. Additional retail/commercial space would be added to the building. Specifically, at-
grade retail shops are proposed along the north and west elevations. Restaurant space would
continue to be provided on the second floor of the westem portion of the building.
There are currently 18 dwelling units (and 0 accommodation units) located in the building.
The redevelopment proposal calls for 18 dwelling units (6 with lock-off potential) and 2
accommodation units, for a total of 19 dwelling units (2 accommodation units = 1 dwelling
unit).
The entire structure would be brought into compliance with all the current Building and Fire
Codes, (the building would be fully sprinkled).
General site improvements, around the perimeter of the Golden Peak House, would include
the following:
1. A concrete unit paver walkway and covered arcade would be added along the
majority of the northern side of the structure.
2. The existing trash enclosures, currently located along the west elevation of the
building, would be relocated into the basement of the Golden Peak House. The
redesign calls for a trash compactor to be located in the basement of the
building and a small elevator would be added to transport the refuse up to the
first floor when trash pick-ups are scheduled. This would occur at the northeast
comer of the building.
� 3. The applicant is willing to discuss possible funding scenarios for modifications
to the Seibert Circle area. Such modifications could bring Seibert Circle into
conformance with the recommendations of the SVeetscape Master Plan.
4. The applicant is also willing to discuss possible improvements to the pedestrian
2
• . � �
- walkway/skier accessway located between Seibert Circle and the Vista Bahn ski
base. Such improvements could include the addition of landscaping, drainage
modifications and the addition of concrete unit pavers. Due to land ownership
issues, cooperation from adjacent property owners would be necessary.
5. The applicant is proposing to construct an outdoor dining deck, at-grade, on the
south side of the Golden Peak House. This dining deck would be located upon
Tract E and would require the modification of the Vail Village 5th Filing
Protective Covenants to allow this use. Additionally, the Los Amigos
Restaurant is proposing to enclose the existing outdoor deck area to the south
of the building. This deck area is currently located upon Tract E, which is not
zoned for such use. However, the proposal calls for this portion of Tract E to
be rezoned, and through a minor subdivision, incorporated into the Golden
Peak House parcel. Further discussion of the issues regarding Tract E follows
in Section IX of this memorandum.
6. It is proposed that the five existing evergreens, tocated along the western
elevation of the building, be relocated south of the building, onto Tract E. The
applicant is currently reviewing the possibility of keeping the evergreens in their
existing location during construction. One other option would be to replace
them with large specimen trees should construction of the building not be
possible without severely damaging the existing trees.
3
� � � •
ill. GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ZONING ANALYSIS
The project's departures from the CCI zone district standards are highlighted in bold type.
UNDERLYING ZONING: EXISTING PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL CORE I PROJECT SDD
Site Area:' 8,338 sq.ft. Same Same
Setbacks: Per the Vail Village N: 0-6 ft. N: 0-3 ft.
Urban Design Guide Plan W: 0-7 ft. W: 0-13 ft.
S: 0-8 ft. S: 0-8 ft.
E: 0.5-1.5 ft. E: 0.5-1.5 ft.
Height: 60%: 33 ft.or less East: 46 ft. max. East: 49 ft.max.
40%: 33 ft.-43 ft. West: 36 it. max. West: 42 it.max.
Common Area: 2,334 sq.ft or 6,570 sq.ft.or 98% 7,066 sq.ft.or 106%
35%of allowable GRFA -2,334 sq.ft.or 35% -2,334 sq.R.or 35%
4,236 sq.ft. added to GRFA 4,732 sq.ft.-added to GRFA
GRFA: 6,670 sq,ft. or 80% 8,958 sq. ft. 17,182 sq. ft.
+ 4,236 sq.ft. (excess common) +4,732 sq. ft. (excess common area)
13,194 sq. ft. or 158% 21,914 sq.ft. or 263%
Units: 25 units per acre,or 18 units 19 units
4.8 units for the site. (18 DU and 2 AU)
Ske Coverage: 6,670 sq.ft. 6,351 sq.ft. 7,672 sq.ft.
or 80% or 76% or 92%
Landscaping: Per the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan
Parking: Per Town oi Vail Required: 56 Required:67
parking standards
Loading: Per Town of Vaii Required: 1 Required: 2
bading standards Existing: 0 Proposed:0
Commercial Uses: N/A 7,157 sq.ft 12,620 sq.ft.
Gross Floor Area: N/A 23,241 sq. ft. 36,868 sq.ft.
' All of the above development statistics have been calculated by staff and are based on the
applicanYs proposed new lot area of 8,338 square feet. This lot area assumes the incorporation of
portions of Tract E and Lot C into the Golden Peak House parcel. The existing Golden Peak House
lot area is 0.159 acres, or 6,926 sq. ft. The new areas (portions of Tract E and Lot C) proposed to
be included into the Golden Peak House parcel consist of 1,412 sq. ft.
4
� . � �
IV. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
1) November 25, 1991 - initial PEC work session to review the redevelopment proposal.
2) January 13, 1992 - PEC update on the redevelopment status of the project.
3) January 27. 1992 - PEC work session.
4) October 26, 1992 - PEC work session.
5) November 23, 1992- PEC site visit to review building staking.
6) November 24, 1992 - Council denied request to proceed through the planning process.
The request inctuded floor area (commercial and GRFA) to be constructed
into the public right-of-way.
V. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the purpose of Special Development Districts is to:
"The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in
the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design
character and quality of new devetopment within the town; to facilitate the adequate and
economical provision of streets and utilities; to preseNe the natural and scenic features of
open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail
Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a special development district, in
conjunction with a property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for
guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district."
1) Although the staff will not specifically address each of the nine SDD review criteria for this
worksession, the criteria are listed below.
A. Deslgn compatibility and sensitivity to the Immediate environment, nelghborhood and
adjacent properties relative to architecturat design, scale, bulk, bullding helght, buffer
zones, Identity, character, visual integrity and orfentation.
B. Uses, activ(ty and density which provide a compatlble, efficlent and workable
relationshlp with surrounding uses and activity.
C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined tn Chapter 18.52.
D. Conformity wlth applicable elements of the Vall Comprehenslve Plan, Town policies
and Urban Design Plans.
E. Identification and mttigatlon of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property
on whlch the special development distr(ct Is proposed.
F. Slte plan, building design and locatlon and open space provlstons designed to
produce a funct(onal development responslve and sensltive to natural features,
vegetatlon and overall sesthetic quality of the community.
5
�r a . ,
G. A circulatton system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and
off-site traffic circulatlon.
H. Functional and aesthettc landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
preserve natural features, recreatlon, vtews and functtons.
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient
relattonshtp throughout the development of the special devetopment district.
2) The nine criteria for Commeraai Core I exterior aiterations shail also be used to judge the merits of
this project. The nine criteria are listed below:
A. Pedestrianizatton
B. Vehlcular Penetration
C. Streetscape Framework
D. Street Enclosure
E. Street Edge
F. Building Height
G. Vfews and Focai Points _
H. Service and Delivery
I. Sun/Shade
3) The zone district amendment criteria (zone change) are listed below:
A. Suitabllity of the Proposed Zontng.
B. is the amendment proposal presenting a convenient, workable relationshtp among
land uses consistent with municipal objectives?
C. Does the rezoning proposal provide for the growth of an orderly and viable
communtty?
6
�
. . � �
. 4) The minor subdivision criteria are as follows:
A. Lot Area - Chapter 18.24.090 of the Town's Municipal Code requires that the minimum lot or
site area for a property located within the CCI zone district be 5,000 square feet of buildable
area.
B. Frontage - Chapter 18.24.090 of the Town's Municipal Code requires that each lot have a
minimum frontage of 30 feet.
5) The review criteria for the view corridor encroachment request are as follows:
No encroachment into an existing view corridor shall be permitted unless the applicant
demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the encroachment meets all of the fotlowing
criteria:
A. That the literal enforcement of Section 18.73.030 would preclude a reasonable development
of a proposed structure on the applicanYs land.
B. That the development of the structure proposed by the applicant would not be such as to
defeat the purposes of this Chapter.
C. That the development proposed by the applicant would not be detrimental to the enjoyment
of public pedestrian areas, public ways, public spaces, or public views.
D. That the development proposed by the applicant complies with applicable elements of the
Vail Land Use Plan, Town Policies, UrUan Design Guide Plans, and other adopted master
plans. -
E. That the proposed structure will not diminish the integrity or quality nor compromise the
original purpose of the preserved view.
VI. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
The Vail Village Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House, as indicated in Sub-Area
Concepts 3-2 and 3-3. Said concepts read as follows:
"#3-2 Golden Peak House
Due to this building's gross inconsistency with the Urban Design Guide Plan and neighboring
buildings, it is identified as a primary renovation site. Relationship to greenspace on south,
Seibert Circle on north, as well as to mountain entryway, are important c:onsiderations.
Loading and delivery must be addressed."
7
�r � . .
�,-- — �.
. 1 ��v �► -- �/ •a+�t
I
j` )���• ,!-�� '-
/ �� � �. � �
�
• ItD LIOr , N111fTUMµ `
K�iA
40a, � ,.` �'.
. 7 �=1t: �,I �,�
` IIAM
/ • ,•'�
��..�..�i��3-2�. . :
Ofll li'!�R wf0t ��:.; �f
Er�� �.�� .• •. . ,
LAC� �� t
. � ` f
,�� /�i . ✓
.. ♦ J� 1 • �' .
'#3-3 Seibert Circle Studv Area
Study area to establish a more inviting public plaza with greenspace, improved sun exposure
and a focal point at the top of Bridge Street. Design and extent of new plaza to be sensitive
to fire access and circulation considerations."
- .,,a.�`_:::.ti. • ,1 � r .. � .
t�EO �j, �' ��
rooc � �u•i�� i..••► •
.00 c .wo. I �••�.._: ••:..—
�
Y CtOC�I • •11a 1�w�MOW[f
T �
.��wo � s�oa". � �_� U�:''.:(�J :
Mh1/�Y .. _ � �
t" � -I �
� �, �����:.�. l� .
���o. , �w�T.�a�
,�,�.�o e
:L�° `�3- � I l . -:-
. .
'; ��.-� '�;—�
;� , �" � �� % ,�
; ,. ;�' •
IitOlqN ; � ���s,�•r
��� •..� �
, i,.. .►u„ �� :: ��
noo. Illlf , �- • ?�
'� �=' '� f
:� �3^3 : , \i: .
♦11RM6L:
� , r �
�/� 1
S�. / ( w0.l�llO.•�• , ��j��
�/ •^^'1.' � i � .
. � �• N��l�a w/0 /
pNE YAII t �•� •.\ �,
NIACE L.J • • 7., ����.
a •
'�.�%_ .� : �"� �
Additionally, the staff believes the following goals and objectives, as stated in the Vail Village Master Plan,
are relevant to this proposal:
Goat #1 - Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the
Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity.
1.2 Objective:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residentiai and commercial facilities.
8
,
. . � " �
- 1.3 ObJecttve:
Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements done by private
developers working in cooperation with the Town.
2.2 Objective:
Recognize the "historic" commercial core as the main activity center of the Village.
2.2.1 Pol(cy:
The design criteria in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan shall be the primary
guiding document to preserve the existing architectural scale and character of the
core area of Vail Village.
2.3 ObJective:
Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations.
2.3.1 Policy:
The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged.
Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to be
designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight
rental.
2.4 Objective:
Encourage the development of a variety of a new commercial activity where compatible with existing
land uses.
2.4.1 Policy:
Commercial infill development consistent with established horizontal zoning
regulations shall be encouraged to provide activity generators, accessible
greenspaces, public plazas, and streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network
throughout the Village.
2.5 ObJective:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and
commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
2.6 ObJective:
Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector.
2.6.1 Policy:
Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or redevelopment
project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning.
2.6.2 Policy:
Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions so as to insure
their availability and affordability to the local work force.
9
� � . .
3.1 ObJective: -
Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements.
3.1.1 Policy:
Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape improvements (such as
paver treatments, landscaping, lighting and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian
ways.
3.4.2 Policy:
Private development projects shall be required to incorporate new sidewalks along
streets adjacent to the project as designated by the Vail Village Master Pian and/or
Recreation Trails Master Plan.
4.1.3 Policy:
With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural open space areas at
the base of Vail Mountain and throughout Vail Viliage shail be preserved as open
space.
The Vail Village Conceptual Building Height Plan has included the Golden Peak House in the 3-4 story
category. A building story is defined as 9 feet of height (no roof included).
VII. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House, as indicated in
Sub-Area Concepts 9 and 10. Said concepts read as follows: �
Concept 9 - "Commercial expansion (ground floor) not to exceed 10 feet in depth, possible arcade. To
improve pedestrian scale at base of tall building, and for greater transparency as an activity
generator on Seibert Circle.
Concept 10 - Seibert Circle. Feature area paving treatment. Relocate focal point (potential fountain) to
north for better sun exposure (falVspring), creates increased plaza area and are the
backdrop for activities. Separated path on north sides for unimpeded pedestrian route during
delivery periods."
.q,� .
�
�l�'�'�
?��. : •.�.
� -�:�;,.,.,� :� '•=� �
�-��"� ;.;�; �"�zo�: � .�, . 8 ��
:. z,, .>:..::,• `��� ' •,
� . ,;i-'_3eAr�1E\,i,� '`
\ ���;�;��,����\f g :1L
/
� ;:.� , .... � �-
� .,,�,i,� ''
�:.�
�-;
.� \ � .
10
. . � •
- Vill. RELATED POLICIES IN THE STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN
The Streetscape Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House area as follows:
"Seibert Circle is proposed to be repiaced by a large planter that is suROUnded by low steps for informal
seating. A large "specimen" evergreen tree should be maintained in the Circie. Seibert Circle's focal point
could be a fountain or an artwork feature that wili be visible from much of Bridge Street. One theme
currently being discussed is a public art project honoring the 10th Mountain Division. Seibert Circle's ability
to be used as a performance site should also be considered."
"The primary paving material for the right-of-way area of the Village Core is recommended to be
rectangular concrete unit pavers, in the color mix specified in the Guidelines for Paving section of this
�eport. The herringbone pattem, which is proposed for most areas, is edged by a double soldier course.
The intent is to satisfy the need for a simple streetscape treatment without being monotonous."
"Focal points - such as the Children's Fountain, the intersection of Bridge Street and Gore Creek Drive and
Seibert Circle - will receive special paving treatments."
IX. DISCUSSION ISSUES
Since this is a work session, there is no formal staff recommendation at this time. However, the staff has
identified the following issues, which we would like to discuss further with the PEC, DRB, and applicants:
1. The proposed encroachment Into View Corr(dor No. 1. - The existing Golden Peak House
currently encroaches approximately 8 inches into View Corridor No. 1. View Corridor No. 1 is the
view from the Vail Transportation Center south to the ski mountain. The proposed Golden Peak
House redevelopment is proposing to encroach into this View Corridor approximately 6 feet-2
inches. This figure includes the current 8 inch encroachment. The encroachment is visible from the
Transportation Center. The effect of the encroachment begins to become more noticeable from the
intersection of Gore Creek Drive and Bridge Street. As one moves from this intersection south
towards the Golden Peak House, it becomes apparent that the redevelopment would impact the
views towards the mountain (i.e. Riva Ridge ski �un). This view from Bridge Street, although not a
formally adopted view corridor, was identified by the PEC at a previous work session as being a
very important view in the Village.
2. The project's departures from the Commercial Core 1 Zone Dlstrict standards, which are
specifically listed in the Zoning Analysis section of this memorandum and are as follows:
a. Building height
b. GRFA
c. Common area
d. Dwelling unit count
e. Site coverage
f. Loading berths
11
� � , .
3. The Tract E issue. The applicant is currently negotiating with Vail Associates for the acquisition of-
portions of Tract E (to the south) and Lot C (to the west). The applicants (including Vail Associates,
as co-applicant), have requested a zone change amendment for the portions of Tract E described
above. Tract E is currently zoned Agricultural and Open Space. The portions of Tract E proposed
to be rezoned generally include those areas which are labeled as Easement #1 and Easement #2
on the attached survey. As the owner of Tract E, Vail Associates has previously granted easements
to the Golden Peak House to allow for specific encroachments, such as roof overhangs and
balconies, in the area of Easement Nos. 1 and 2. These encroachments are considered legal, non-
conforming uses within the Agricultural and Open Space Zone District, and as such, all legal, non-
conforming uses cannot be enlarged or expanded, and if modified, they must be brought into full
compliance with the zoning code. In order to allow for building modifications in the easement areas,
and to be in full compliance with the zoning code, the applicants are proposing the following:
-Rezone the easement areas from Agr/Open Space to CCI.
-Minor subdivision to incorporate the easement areas into the Golden Peak House parcel.
The protective covenants governing Tract E will need to be modified to reflect a change in
the Tract E boundary.
-SDD overlay on entire Golden Peak House parcel.
4. Los Amlgos Deck - Ron Riley, as one of the co-applicants, would like to include an outdoor dining
deck on Tract E, which is currently zoned Agricultural and Open Space. The conceptual design for
the proposed deck calls for an expansion of the deck approximately 14 feet from the southern face
of the existing outdoor deck and approximately 80 feet long. This request will require a zone district
amendment. The applicant is considering several possible rezoning options to allow for the deck.
These include:
A. Rezoning the area for the deck to Commercial Core I zoning. A deck is a conditional use in
this district. �
B. Rezoning the area for the deck to Ski Base Recreation II, which would involve the creation of
a new zone district that has limited ski base uses. A deck would be listed as a conditional
use.
C. Amending the Agricultural and Open Space District to include outdoor dining decks
associated with ski base areas as a conditional use.
At this time, a specific rezoning district has not been selected. The applicant and staff are
interested in the PEC members opinions on this issue.
5. Architectural Design Issues - The following comments should be reviewed in conjunction with the
proposed elevation drawings for the Golden Peak House. The letters (A, B, C etc.) on each
elevation correspond with the comments discussed below. In general, staff believes that the overall
architectural style is positive and is compatible with the alpine character of the Village.
NORTH ELEVATION
A. The proposed second floor Los Amigos restaurant expansion, on the north side of the west
building, will be removed from this application, as the encroachment into the Town right-of-
12
�
. . � �
way was not approved by Town Council on November 24, 1992. The revised facade for this
area wili incorporate stucco, with windows similar to those proposed on the west elevation of
the restaurant.
B. The central connection between the east and west halves of the building should be cut back
to the east, and roof forms should be simpiified and lowered. The hot tub located on the flat
roof of this central connection should be relocated to the south side of the fifth floor addition,
to a less visible location. �.-�L, a�� �
C. Where applicable, flat roofs should be modified to pitched roofs, similar to the roof forms
utilized at the Sonnenalp and Christiania. These roofs should have a truncated peak instead
of the traditional ridge peak. One example of this would be to move the existing pitched roof
to the east end of the building and extend a gable form perpendicular to this ridge. Other
variations are also possible - the idea is to remove the flat roofs which are prominent from
the Bridge Street vantage point (and from the ski mountain) and do not comply with the
Urban Design Criteria for the Village. It will be necessary to view the model at the work
session to explain this concept further.
D. The fifth floor building mass should be pulled back to the south away from Seibert Circle as
much as possible to provide relief on the north facade.
E. The first floor arcade needs refinement to create more of a pedestrian area. Suggestions
include:
1. Delineating the roof of the arcade to break up the height of the facade;
2. Opening up the access through the east end of the arcade;
3. Embellishing the design of the windows and doors through interesting detailing, such
as smaller window panes, "grand" entry doors, etc.; _
4. Lowering the roof form over the entry.
EAST ELEVATION
A. The peaked roof form that is built into the facade to conceal the flat roof behind it should be
redesigned. Architectural detailing is essential to this elevation to break up the massing of
this facade. It cannot be assumed that the Cyranos Building will redevelop and screen this
elevation.
WEST ELEVATION
A. The third and fourth level projections (ftoor area) should be decreased in size to diminish the
"canyon" effect through this important gateway to the ski mountain. Perhaps railings could
extend in front of the projection to help break up the building mass.
B. The large trees (approximately 5) adjacent to the existing building should be preserved.
Landscaping in this corridor is critical, as it is a transition area between the Village and the
ski mountain.
13
� � . .
C. Entry into the Vail Associates commercial space on the south side of the building (under the
Los Amigos deck) needs to be more accessible and inviting. The staff's suggestion is to pull
back the entry to the east to create more space in front of the door. This would take away
some deck area on the floor above.
D. The first floor retail windows need smaller panes to create a more pedestrian scale.
E. Landscaping, pavers, and lighting should be carried through this gateway to the mountain.
SOUTH ELEVATION
A. The flat roof connections should be integrated into the existing pitched roof forms. The
greenhouse on the east side of the fifth floor is somewhat of a 'foreign" architectural element
in the Village and should be made more consistent with the alpine character of Vail.
B. The Los Amigos outdoor dining deck is proposed to have structure located above it, which is
a concern because the deck would no longer have as much sun exposure. The resolution of
the additional deck request on Tract E will directly relate to this issue.
C. Some of the roofs over south facing balconies could be cut back to help decrease the mass
and bulk of the building. Landscaping along this elevation needs to be addressed.
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING
. Detailing on the balcony railings should reflect a more alpine character. -
. Once the mass and bulk of the building is refined, the window detailing on the north elevation
should be carried through to the other parts of the project, particularly the east building.
6. Employee Housing Issues - As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of the Town's
Master Plans, employee housing is a critical Town issue which should be addressed through the
planning process of all development proposals. The employee housing report prepared for the
Town of Vail by Rosall Remmen and Cares indicates recommended ranges of employee housing
units based upon uses and floor areas. The midpoint of employees generated was used for the
analysis. A copy of the report's summary page is attached to this memorandum.
Upon review of this report, the staff has analyzed the incremental increase (square footage per use)
that the redevelopment would create and we would recommend that the Golden Peak House
include employee housing, either on-site or off-site as a part of the redevelopment:
a) Bar/Restaurant = 1,081 sq. ft.(@ 6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 7.02 employees
b) Retail & SeNice Commercial - 2,546 sq. ft.(@6.5/1,000 sq. ft.) = 16.54 employees
c) Lodging = 2 AU's (C� 0.75/unit) = 1.5 emplovees
d) Total = 25.06 or 25 employees
14
,
, . � �
"s
25 employees x .15 housing multiplier - 3.75 or 4 employees
25 empioyees x .30 housing multiplier= 7.54 or 8 employees
Assuming two employees per unit, 2 to 4 employee housing units are recommended.
7. Streetscape Design issues - The Town's Streetscape Master Plan lists numerous improvements
which are recommended to be installed adjacent to the Golden Peak House. These improvements
generally cail for the upgrading of Seibert Circle and the upgrading of the pedestrian/skier access to
the Vista Bahn ski base. The applicant has indicated a desire to assist with the cost of such
improvements, however, at this time only a preliminary design has been completed (in the
Streetscape Plan).
The PEC/DRB should recommend and discuss the improvements they would like to see the Golden
Peak House developers instalVconstruct as a part of the redevelopment of the site. Such
improvements should be directly related to the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, and
should be tied to the mitigation of the project's impacts on the Town and the adjoining public
spaces.
The staff believes that improvements to Seibert Circle should be incorporated into the project
because the building is essentially proposed to be built up to the property line. The space in front
of the building needs to be addressed in further detail. Staff is in the process of developing cost
estimates for the circular plaza per the Streetscape Plan for the applicant. The Vail Village Master
Plan specifically cites the relationship of this project to Seibert Circle.
The sun/shade analysis should be reviewed when analyzing the Seibert Circte area.
c:lpec�memoslgoldpeak 127
15
� M . .
EXHIBIT "A" -
Golden Peak House
SQUare Footaqe Analvsis
Exist(ng Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA Office
Basement Levei: 1,932 2,364 0 96
First Floor: 3,924 1�276 p 2g2
Second Floor: 1,301 1.332 2,466 168
Third Floor: 0 1,480 3,749 p
Fourth Floor: 0 118 2,743 0
Totals: 7,157 6,570 8,958 556
Totai square footage (gross area) - 23,241 sq. ft.
Proposed Conditions _
Commercial Common GRFA
Basement Level: 4,749 2,589 0
First Floor: 5,770 1,528 0
Second Floor: *2,101 1,388 2,510
Third Floor: 0 801 5,672
Fourth Floor: 0 740 5,778
Fifth Floor: 0 20 3,222
Totals: 12,620 7,066 17,182
Total square footage (gross area) = 36,868 sq. ft.
'Does not include the Los Amigos deck area, which may be proposed to be enclosed.
16
. • � •
. Exhibit "B"
Golden Peak House
Dwellinp Unit Analvsis
Existin :
DU AU
Basement Level: 0 0
First Floor: 0 0
Second Fioor: 8 0
Third Floor: 8 0
Fourth Floor: 2 0
Totals: 18 0 = 18 DUs
Proposed:
DU AU Lock-off
Basement Level 0 0 0
First Floor: 0 0 0 -
Second Floor: 5 0 1
Third Floor: 8 2 1
Fourth Floor: 4 0 4
Fifth Floor: 1 0 0
Totals: 18 2 6
Note: 2 AUs = 1 DU Total DUs = 19
17
� � , .
EXHIBIT "C"
Golden Peak House
Parkinp/Loadinq Analvsis
Existing Conditions - Required
ParkinQ Spaces Loadina Berths
Retail Commercial/Restaurant 23.1 1
Residential 30.0 1
Office 2.2 p
TOTALS: 55.3 = 56 2 (-1 for muftiple use credit)=1
Proposed Conditions - Required
ParkinQ Spaces Loadinq Berths
Retail Commercial/Restaurant 36.1 2
Residential 30.0 1
TOTALS: 66.1 3 (-1 for multiple use credit)=2
18
n•.R
'�:��
.:�A
1�� 1�� • � ��w�� :,'•t7
1 j- ' 1�
;� �e�� ��1 ` f�� �x
, ;i'� �,� ��`�=. �s
�\, , �
i� �� �� �'��_ioi— � :;�
- , ?i!!!�!�l ?;�
- - ��� � � � � �'''%
�� �� '� �.
�� _ �'I f� ""J l��I ��
/ �� :�1 "�) �I�I :�� . ,
i i '�;� � (��i r ;
� Ilr�l :��t
�i t�...�; �� �� I_ � �- , _..:..�.r .
� f��� ,' L� s ��
�:L�'��.�..�! �,
� ` I C a ,a
1 I� a
...w�.
��:.�
r'''�i..•�'�/ � j �!.� •.��-- -'��►\ i'':�
���
�' C►] I .w
� � (�� �•� •
��� i L _1 _
- ' I R
� �' ��j ,� _____ �• �� �
.
. � I � �a . �1� .
�.-��.-�.�i� � ��
, �
:
� _ , � ,;��;
'����w.�� �� .r. � ��
� / �. r�
���,�� ,: � I a
.. sr.��.-�.. ; ._ �� i�+��/F,�
� � � � � -4
I � i 1� • I�'� _ ��..i�►''�
/� � �i�i.1 �
�,•
.ry��,`
� r
• 1 •1 3: ����
! (�� `,"r:
� � �• � ';r
'� -I� •, 1—�� 1� ..,�
' �;� �'� -- .�.
s!� i,. -,a R�
��'�� -�� � � II ' ,�
�II �-��
/ ;� �! � I� ' �;�I ■� ���� :�
,� �•' -- i_ �� ���� '���.:�p� �
, - . - '_' „�
; ��` � � �� E� I �
I �'�' - L� ' ; :'.
�i�l� - , � - �, � `�:
� -- C. �� �- - i � 1 L
� ���s: I C� _ :
'� ; !►I � �� �„���ir�s,;�
,_ � � �•r.- �
� p r r,.
,' l���► i� �� � I :�.;
��l�i '— �� i �_ � � ���
I � .�� I �' � ��-��� .i� .
/ �►�� , „� �;
���� ...�, .
, ���, �,, ::�
' i ' '� � �
� � � .- 1 ¢Y
��'�, - ty
1 �I � ���
..,--- � ,,y�
�1 � �I��) � / I "=�,
11 I :S"
� �ii--Il f �� � _,�.
�; � �����_� -- � �� � :
� � ��, ,,,, �� ��_
� �� � ��..� -- ' `i�� ; :;�
, � -� —�= :—_ ��
� , �,.�� � �, .
:,
::�
:�
.. -�- -' , . ',
� � .
. ,
_ � � . . , t �
�
, �
I _ _ _ -- �
� - $ � ---- � �
J _ r, ._ _ _._-�-= � o.
� - -- -- � % , . � � � . � Q '° ,
- _ __7: .__ . � � \
_ _'�___ _ . /' , , � • � `
� =;� - -.--_ / � , • � W ,
-� _1_-__ �. _"�__ , '�� : W .
_- -- �--- _=- _ �� ' � . � �
� � -- �- � __ . .�, . . . . . . . � . . � Q
- -___�_____ _ _- ``. W i
-='"� � . , .' �� � .
��. -_ + \
�- _- , .
-r=.-�-- '� , . � ;
--,_ � ,� , � � .
��_.._-- , . . ` i
� =� =-- / • �. . . . ��-- - - t
. -�` , ' � • � . � `.; � ;
_ _ _:�(- _. ._ _ .. 1 i
=- ! � -��:. _ I .
-_ ;. \ _ . _= ' • � ( I
_- �\� --__--- . ' ` I �
.. _ . {
- \- . - � �
1 ' ? �
�=- � - � � ' � i I
--_--- ,, � � . � , , . � i
_ -- . ; � , I �
, - . . ,
- _ � � � - -�-_ _ _ _. _ i ;
- - - . _^. - - - - -�,.,�
,
-_ - _ --. - - --- - -- - - - ,�, ' i
--_- . :- _ - liii���� �
,;
_-_� -__-- - . . , . � . . . . �i;,',�',) �
___ - -- _ - __ - ��. �.� '
_ _ -- � _ {
- - r 1 '
-� I
;
�
_.� � -
_ f: - . .
�, �
� ��
� `� �►� _
�- �
�h �'C� -�; ...�. �1 �} �r�
1��1�, ��1 ..' � 7 - ,
� � --., �� I C��� ���
� �= ��I �!�, ���,i
���� �i _� _,� ,
�;u�.�,+ - j (�►i � (�!��I( �I��
ii'��;, ������ `•I C��� L��I'
''�' �'��'� � I� ��! i �I
����1, �, --; ' �
� � �. I C.�� �
��� � �,� _�
�� �\ ...�
;�;� `�~�'°�,
'�� , C=:1 [�1-� `�►�'.f�
�. ,
��' � ! �;�' �I�`� �' '
I �_� �'a I '-1 I i
I � ' I '��: � L��� �� ,..,
.. �� ; , � ,�. � ; : ::a..
�'� ���' C, i
1 ' - _ �,
' � _
� ��.�. C.� C ;.
,�
1 ; I C�� C�i���i�
1 '
�
'i��i�� �a�iaeo►_���
' ���;�.� ���!�;-i=- :j
*, { ��li � ' 1�'�,9 (���:�
i�..��' �� � (��� . +���.�"— ,,t�,
�=� � i � '�I ��'�.����'<
r.�i 1(� ���....I
�
i C� e��: T��.�, i,��i�'��!�!`i:
�I��i `=�1� I l�j I'� �� I ..
� � � I �� I
�� 1 (� ,i
,��� �� � --
, , � �� � ..
� ; ��. � � . �
, � �
��i � C�i_ �
_t, �t._._..:
��� � C�== � ��
� ►11
;_ ;�I� i C'��
_ ' �� �'�I�.
= � ��j � `
--��"�'-- i � ' ��_ �� � ��
_ ,—.�— _��/
� -� �i -i^�, � i
_ ,.�.--�� -��- ,..�,
� �� � ,���
�I I _. '
, �1 � � • �:
� �I :� �'/
; C� �� C�� � �
C� � � C��� . =�
I .sw .�� =.'q
..���1� � j C_;5`
�I � �� ��■�,�] :
��. , �!!,,'
� �i��
�
� a _ � � ► �� -
�I�� �� s_����� = •
...��.n■�� .
� ��
� ,�f� �_� ` '
�!�� ��i ��
�- ,..�.I ..�. -"'�c�- �
- !—'-
. ; • • 1 • �fi;s��
� . .f��..,
c 1 � �,�',��r�;;y
.,._.- . . - . � ' °�'� �
��.. . '.' � . .- " . , - . . . � �--�} ` _ , 4 : ♦
' - __' . I ' ..
� ; -. - I � I � �
' L --- - � �
_ . ,. � 1 � �
� _ _ _ _ . Q �
_ - - �; -- �. �. . . > �
- _ . � , c� w v
, � � ' J
� �I - -- , � --
� �� __ � ; -- �
I , _ =-= � f �- �
� � __---- � ,,, ,,' W
,, ` _ _---__ - t' � :' ___ I �
�
-- --
-- - - - .
- -- __ , ,
T " _- .-__=_:_ � _ . - . ; i
,
_ _-__ =-_-=__- - - ; WI
,� , ,Q _ _- ____-R_ _ -
� , . _-- _
, _
l ' � : -- : � -�
' � - -- - 1
, =.- _ =�= ��� I
, -- ; -
�I _ . . � . • ` . '• ..'- I� __- r� �
+-� . . . . . . � , �
� _ .i . . _- � .
�, f =��;�, ! � _-��_ -----
� ; -�,�, � � � _==
, ;
_ �
�� �
�`\ �
�� ;
;
� �
� --� .
� � � `+ ;
�-� �
I
�
�
�
;
` (
� � __ :
► --,: ;;____�
��
� �-___
�
,
��::�
�Mr �.
-- .
� , . .... _
�
i � '
�
! ►D �
� ,
. � , � � `�f�� �, W ( — � � t
t � � � � � � ? � ;� ' .� _ - � � I� 4 �i
z� c F I� � � � � �` � � ii - = c V W�
a � a i ��iE� - -- � ��_ �
_ = - �� � :: Q ;��
e ,. :z J �o _ �
` � • �r - J �g
�a �
; i>�
_ � �g �� � � ��.
. � b � —
G c Y; �` �
• F
z 7 _u t
�I i
8 � e `� •�~' �� � ' :
m ` ;'f.�: ' .'���' �, °
o f:� -s:- •.y6 � � <
S=, y� � y
T -i:
'o � I 2 ` -- `z �9 _ �.
t' Ou _ F_ Jo O !_
LLo _ _ _ •a �� oo ' d 5
"� `co �-`' :.i ¢u � 'i
\ s i_ ,
�� �► - • j �
� �- .� .�,� °
� � ( 6O _ ��J z
g �. �gFi1D�' +.� i —'
' � CG 5 .i^ �•�• � i� S
� `t'm � a�
O� ,_� _ .`"_.�—
uu '
L
F _ � F -
�i � ' tj"3! l+jl ?c
� � ::� �,•4� ',; am
r, ; ;�' _� �?',�`r
LR C� • . �
{' g� � .=.� � � . "� � �'C
._ �� ;
� �o
wm �, :
m �' �
: . ' � �� �' _ - °�� °`"
G� . o o, ; : �:.�.
Le_ "p� � - cS C �c� f'<
'=C '. 2 �m � '.hr z E� 5�f
E.� i'.� � i R �s �y� €`�tE
f'� � . � W �� V 3c� Z .F' �'Ya � 'y
E S � � � CL € ;sE 'E< G S
�*Y � � ''� � F _- Q, ``� � E>`� � ��=i ��i€�
�€'� � 4 � �g :-�� `¢ 'iC �..�i.�
.c� y� ' s ix .�- <r'C,=- � +C3 �e,;C!
25 ° � ': {' k4.tr ��8.� •�'t
S:; 4 � � i r i�. _5�y f.e ;�s`.K
� �
t<3 t � ; YFa� _ �_-� / � �_tc �ti_t
_ \ •'*• � � �. � py�b
� ry�. .. �
\�` C � � u� �PO � ~
i� . �1� �i - � �� �
a� I •�t"{ �� �jT� CS
i , � ' • /
` ����^ r. . �� � �
, �� .�-�� /�z, � % �� �
- i >
�.
0
e
H
�
•�
.
.
. . _ :_ . �
• ' -�
� � �
M - 'j; '.-'�
�i��,(S; • _ •,�^
' -" �` • - ���'t ..i
�•i T � �'`.:`-`.�`
t � ' •� �
���' �
�` 'i' ._ _
:' � C'' ' ♦t:�
,,,, ,_�•_ '��
i; � _.
.• :_
i���
;. • O i-'==':(o
.� _ . Q.;:_::�
�� 'r • � ���r�` .
.� �'•�
0O �' �
' � � �. �
� .
..4 ..,a: �'t '��C}
''�� ` , i V
� �`_�{- _♦ 7t
-��': � �-
�,
-. -
` �• :4
� �, s.
�• �
. ta, ~; �
� `+��• ��
i•.�'` _ --
- ':r.
, —���� �
� �
": ♦
� :� : . -
�
�'`� '��.���1'l'} :��ad�
- �• µ�• ,,~,� "�� �
G•i'fi r_"i .�t
• •'r -��.� f
i` ~`"s`._-:Y. :E:
.�.� �_yy�cc,, T �• • �.?� � '�y K.
�_ ��� • I ti � T��� • 'I�.ta1, X'2
_ _ �. ..�;'�.�;�-� .=�%�:=:�.
� , � ;' r'- .
' =��:�.
��'
n �
� ' _ '�s � ��
Y��' ���F
rt,
.z
• �f
ti
� ..
'M`� .�.
..= '....•'�'`� �,�� k-
.'�-,^:.'-�ie�'�'�-: ..• ��3 - =s'
:f�,s�����''��A7;�'�`s� �_�.
• ��.��'�:<
; ...:_�,;`� � .��::,:,�,
.• �1�• "i
��aha'�r,��� ,�;;��^'L.a i.
1"'`��-�r,''4._�*'�1�(;�["���+��r +!'
`�1~�•' �
E•l�,k;1rY��r�.�,,�,qw. i.�E�y��• ' .
�k��•1;,�{,,::���•��t�' :y� `l
�� .,,'�""'�.: �� :-
N �,- �:.��., ..
� .?�-;�r�-. r1'-��;Y.
t '�` �H.:i•.:y
`�_ L '7. •�'
� L �
. . . . . . J _ - --
ROSALL REMMEN CARES � � �'� �^ �` 1 °.
PLANNiNG. URBAN DES�GN AN� RESEARCH � �
:_ . ..__ . .. ....,..: .,..-..-_-, �,::.t.. '�
..�
_ �
SUGGESTED EhiPLOYMENT CATEGORIES AND RANGES FOR VAIL
EXPRESS�D AS EMPLOYEES PER lOOO SQUARE FEET
RRC RES�xcx
OVERALL SUGGESTED .
AVERAGES RANGE
Bar/Restaurant 5,7/1000 s.f. 5-8/1000 s.f.
Retail and Service Commercial 5.9/1000 5-8/1000
Retail: Grocery/Liquor/Convenience 1.8/1000 1.5-3l1Q00
Office: Real Estate 7.6/1000 6-9/1000
Office: Financial 3.1/1000 2.5-4/1000
Office: Professional/Other 6.6/1000 5-8/1000
Conference Center NA 1/1000
Health Club NA 1-1.5/1000
Lodging* '"—'� 1.3/room .25-1.25/room �
Local Government 6.5/1000 5-8/1000
Construction (Offices, Interior Storage, etc.) 10.6l1000 9-13/1000
Multi-Family N/A 0.4lunit
Single Family � ; NIA 0.2/unit
�
Other: To be determined through the SDD �
process, upon submission of adequate
documentation and a review of the application
materials.
* Lodging/accommodations has particularly large variation of employees per room, depending
upon factors such as size of faciliry and level of service/support facilities and amenities provided.
The standards present a wide range of employment, but it is anticipated that a definitive report
will be submitted by each lodging property requesting an expansion, which would then be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
4
_. . . _ _ .�. ,.. _._;r, .�. ,. _. . . .. ..,��. . , _ .. � �_. -_ .
• �• . .
. _ _ _. - y;�—•-�-
�:� �- . .
��: - -
� -
�.,�� , _.
. .: _ ,:
,��- _ -
. t .
�:s. -
�.,� - _ .
•.r _. -
_ �f._- r
���• - . _ -
. ;t,,.� - -- �
a'£,-�. . � . -
�k.z' :�.. � '
st:��,, -
,3`,.;�`y= ��.• ,� t ��. -.'
�� � i(i ,�: �� , ' �;
t` �,�'?>� w tn� �' l-
_ _ �n�a�`
': y _ - . ��.�,'" �
..�� �� " � M�
r��� � � �_ _ ��
;r . '� .-.%
� ,� �:� ',� ,.d:.-��3 �.>.�.r . � -
�-'s'"�w-f,°"'. ' r �: }a� .
•� :: r� < � �`" � .�>', .tr:' � ' .�. �.
s� k
.�. ��s��tie� ,,��''a��7 �
•a,t7� y �, r� � � , r r t :��,°^ "�,�n'a, '• .,s_, .��,�'�..+�
� :_�R a ��+`e ,,.;` .J^� ' ,� : _"' ;�'
..'4+ .+�'..�e _-+u. ��.� - �' s�
.v _ ,91t,i �� . �-., ��; x1, -,y rsY�x Y� .� '
`�'�^ry� . .. '��..-� �` .�`� "� .3t�t'.7
-�'�.��t � �. m � �;.*.��- �M1`�s� '�-�'��"-�:`'!
� •5_ r.:� �y,,- "',.� ,y.- �r ,�e. �,+'
J�r��� ' -
K,.;�. _ , ..._ - •-�-^= r ' �l
�' � �' ''�:�
4'"' - , y 2 - ,.�
. . M�;s� ;;xfii' �i,,.. � �..�
+' �:r'� ��:':
.:.��,. . ' _ > �.: � :..�y„i
' �
`. ' �. �'ft -.�.t�
, . .
L' *
,� �
'.�,• S• r x� �
� .'�, ,� '' �
��'"ly_;� ���� * rµjU `.r J F�`�
� 6'ti '1 � �'�� Y�..5�� �7�.� ��' �!� � 'T��
� r�
- :.Y �,� � �- `
� ��, _ �P 'Y�ry` '� ��� ��. `����*' r.�c-.��.� s�
r�. fy'� h .S'w,r ci --�-r�., :L ,�.+iCYt.e�� . �'�
x �,�'�+vi. ' � Y� �tn�`F A t �•-- .� . �r1 . - y- a
`Qs 7 .tt f �'"" �y 9E:� ad Y �t'ytGy�'�`�; F . '.;`��~ '. ,..s_1.,+'�: '�..
.�t� ' �, _ d ,.Sr,,,�Y. i� ��`R,_7 � K`
r�` �'����� �_ -
s '�=.,r-T.� .;�'c �.r; .�i '��. '� S
� — ,,, , ; � 1. .*r� ��" �3j;�; y �"`� � `-�
• �� '� / / 4� ��
� A\ ■� �.•
i�� � . �� �� —��
w �.-. . ' . � � �
� -. _ � naF,;. �.
I�
t.
�' . t
r-�% �s' .� . - � ^2'x�.�
, . .
.. .. , .
_..� � >;�t;
- ��. _ _.�. _ .. ���
�
� ��.
.�.e�ca.�......a:�- - ------" -- — � -
...h .. . _ . - �i'C'�:...,,�.. _^ . __'"._"'._ � _ . _
`-._. .. -�;�,: . ... �„q�, �...�1r �-„�)� .. __� '.-�'� _.'; . `' _ -- — -- `�`�_ ., _ _ _
., vi'L�!�+ 'a. _�+.. r-'.� ... ' _ ... .�. _.. _ _ .
'��Se!'¢
1
: �� � ..
�� ,�,�:. s+;,�+��t�, ____,.._. .. . _
. . • •
. _ .��� ��,���`,� �: �,.„ # '"� , ' �,
� � �.�� �-n^'x`":�c � --..� .� � ��:-i r ;�� �.'�q�"�'�:_ 3�k'�� �✓�!p �?E'�_'�};,��x��`�•'�.`'���•�`i
�s:. � r�f ��` �� ,&S n .-Y �� i fi � 4w�€a:�,{ �i.i 9..F�F'i �`.� �
t
�4� ; ��r �r ��r. K�i�'�"i�����4� t � r�r fi t''., ��'+'�'����,_� �s��,`�'�-���4 r�t,.. _�
i }
� �� � � .ry.��.y� � .�.�'S �'-1 , - � �_ .F � :' �, k+S - ;•i
w � �
s
�+°��'��s ?�� r '.,x4^r.,t� s� S, t'�. � -s' .. '�t ��� . o � a _
.s-7' °� � °'�'1 4r t ��Y� .�.G,�� c � .. �t? z �I3'F''�'s`. "��'�°�^��t�i�++'+t-?�'�,-.1 y�.,t' �-
{ '�..'+�.�$ 9f�j���. .,r e �.-; -f , sa's"s��„Y�1•�r�"•�y�`�x�,`�
x��� �h {' 'E� .�.'th y�� ' � :' �-���a, �� � .
°r' . r` =�c+. `i - �'i`',�'"k °-�-�F����''.``�'a��y��
. t +n' ,
��� '� - - " f`.}`' _,y�
-� � �� .r -�`�° - - �-_°
��+k r . ��.'k . - �.a�t�,x.'""*�
''���~ - � .f. 1' t � a _ ` � . � , : �.�;d��.
��s�,_ Y�._ � �� 1
�
- 1, S� . '.A _ �
-':i� 1
� .
� �� �_
- �� '.�.. �' ..
� �a �`'.`. � �--i. : ... r
� } s a t " �:'E,c r���
s �.� � �.., ��� 7a`�r . �..'k�=.-' '""�;±.y�` ,,.�. r?�a
�Y}�� �'��'" �j �"b.�.: .t'-�v '.t•' . .. . .
' 't��'�� . '_ _ � . 'i
fwY Y � �. _
} ti.f� -..�.?� , 'r�,a-, } 4.' �_.;f'y �s *.x k'� � � � '�i,ey . .,:...
t ,� t > �r,. ,i�Y `' A. �.y.t o_` ,.y 'i�,:r- :.�S � ;d$ � ,r:. �'�Vi:z�
. . . . a. -� yi .,- ..' 'Z�" � �� �'S��'.�
� f } ' . . z-� 1 �i' �.� I�� .a � �R;,.. � 4y�,.i.,.'.+-- -.
e �� 'j ks.r.; �� ' . .. } �. 5„•� � �t" ''�4� '�'rt' ey��,3
y'� � t �. � �s.e s. a' x�- -`_� � 2 j.k. -Y'.ra�s 'q�� �}��,��Q{ ��
y _ �i ss ./ . �^'�j'�v'_�;4�-:�s
. ��h: s� L���Y � y� " il �'$'+4'i+Y2�<���`'��
� �� rs k q,r +, 'v'� '� rr-:.4'.. .� �� � �`E,..
w� ' ;�R � " _ �Kr: ? d¢
� • i -i ' � i'.- 4 _ '�� 3,' .� > Y � ��
�`�.y,.,�� �- y, . � .j f '�_y A > —'� -E:�
...�+4",�"�iY^� 'y''¢s L q.• "'b f l" �_ �. ,l �y _ t�.I,� ,�..,�J�' �� K
:'.>i . . .,. �_. ..�:^ r' - a �� �"��� F-^`�
,.X � �'
-'.gi1 ., .� �` . _ � ,h - ' .- ", �C'" �4 i ..
^ �"� L y.�` Y'M L� ��L{._ r'� .y� r y H � '�.p� 3�S '�"k.y,� Z,�.xJ f :
's.� .r-� ��.� .�,s -�� .� x-� i ':a ��r � '�� tf .,'�,,•*L '� �-
t R Er,� ^c �S� f � z . s . "�c'.�� -.'� .` .x- F." .7 � L �` �+� ti�p���0�`;�
'_� . ��V' o.i,. i' �- " '��t��� �
�+ X _ Y, sr ��` �+�..+2'�+ ��
r. _ ! s`+i r_r � .R :'Q�r° � �' ��
� - ' ;,� _ . .. �r x� ��� ..�
�s��� �t�` ' �� �:.V... ��' 4LS�P�'�
'�:.�'-�04 �..,�.:,.trc��i
�
� ���
$ �
� 4
_ y
L
.. _ ... � . � ���
�x n � , � .� .
'4. ..4 -. ,.
�.. ' � 'd� � •--'.?E:" ) FX,i'�$e%:i4
.�[� x.� ��_ ,r _'e...
� • � . . .
i �
. �
1
I .
t �'
I
1 �
' .
r
i
�
, .
� �` .
� .
� � � .
� �
i
i �
� � os� .
� �;��ro�cln u�c�►t _
t _ � ,
Lr'-''"-� r�� '• l . - � ----•�''
�.�...�-.� .r�- �.-:-- ,,.�- , �
:�-'� � '_-•' . �
' P =' s,-: �_ �'�
. , , , ����_. - ♦!__
�C15�1n� GD�i''I�BP �6��
o.(�p(�, � �oU� ����,( o
'V��UY' Gbf�f't�DY G��. � " 4,V��p�'�I WIq,V� µ
.''� .. �ws.�t�iai+.' .e��� �f:
.y x'+' y � M..��teiY¢�{�ty,yt?iva 'Srr.�r � r.� � � .
i�
. � �sf � .� ..� �-..f`�ca�. :t-e. ��•f ;`iyLl�•�tr.j4 � ..���=.e i _
A �Y ' � .�W ..lS .tnL� F�t� q +4��S �.
� ����. ��-. .,��� � ..ki�� 4.-. 'a��f� E.
�,'�'�'' Y
'i''�R f �'i`-..1'� .6,��; .+��. •.�1}.�.� � .�t�` �...1 IR 1 . '
.-.i -:f � � }.
� ���r �� . ��� yf �'•. � 'i' ',�. � ��F
� ?� . . j.' � K ,, �� t.-.
�{ e l� � � ' j��J
.:t : ;•.T� .e .. t:
d� i�,
'��' � ��� :�� s S
i a � .
t'` �c � ' �" ��3
-_ �'�.i,�', �R,� * 1 r.�i �io�i m� �-:
�C :�� `; �.� � :� , � _ � :.�`'�
�jl�... �= � ,� . .� . �
-!� i'� ,. ' ..ea Ni' +�._"�
..��. C .�K ?�:� � '''i.•"� 4� -f': �y .
S 'A �'.� � ?4�`
' ����._%2I � ••�• '��� . �� _�� lA .�/t •�
� s� . ` � ��._ . ^' , _� '. ' �� .
�' f�' -' � iy� 1 .�; ,y� 'f"t t _�,¢.-,`ay�''a �
. �� il��`4 . . ,�1�''� 13• ����e� � ir .. "� � !. .� .._
v..y,r .Y A. � � `�� Y,�lt,, -. �d� µ„ q -afP i ..i-�� "„L r ' s
�:'. ; ++�.o',i,h:.s'r� ~"�;� ;�,�� R .., �ia=�� �i} K� Y x i i E.n7��'c�
G� '•�. i�;3� _ v'K� ��� j .' ' :
.f rm�� � �n `r y �' 2 t q. ��„�;�� "' `' j��,'+� y/' ..�
++�.ws Y+ .[i. � ��t �y� .r n e�. � ��.�:3�s'. .,,. ,.y, �..�� � ."�,1 �s
y�� � " -]F � + - '��' '>`� •�-�s ''� ,�
.[� �► t' ':..�� $ � �, � �'�e ti � �.s .��
� S__ . � �.ey. �„ "� �s�9c q� i �lr'� ,r +T� 4 � :
� �, t F .. 'l �. C' -�:..i� �' i�'�� !.-�✓ .. .l� - _ .
�i�� - • , x` '��!�� € ,� •� a �,ar.°.� ��. ��y+9 � �� ��t
�.. .' yy � 3 - .. t� "� � . "''"R s A'xn"1+„'"..r }'
:w•_�'? 5' ��r. y,-�. � K' .� �
i�'L.: J .�,-. . � - .:.�a-.- :.:.v7`t .>�'.
+° � ," --sI}++ x
� 4 �M+ .�_., , s ��i f={ �
.t.. �� �' •. r . :.. i ..�"`j`,�." _ _ fi,._ .:t� ^�■■. . '
� � �� �z'.
. :.,_
�- �- _ x..�7 :+' t.. ._Y . �,� � - .�wy z
��[1 '�' �:+,t r?-. �,�., �'}�� I•�,T `i '�I` ° "'�.'t���t..- ^��.. '
• .�•' _��."i � , _' ).
Y."t� •y���r�i���� �_ �,:
. 4�'T � � � 'E,-°'�
t S�a�� � -�+�
-.w.� � .1��� : F i�:4� . w'� '�,�.�'� '��„_ � . 71
�♦ '9j.�, .rrh.. � . - i.:"_ �:'
_ � .o. �. � ,�r.,.'`D'��' �i �"�"'t ,�-.�-- _ -
.../":%'2h:��. ' . - . _ - •. �- ?:'�."'"'w.. _ r.4 •./,
�t _ . . .C... -tj � '��
n o 1 \ } '.. \ \
oo" . . . . . � so
OC^DY�POO�00• , \
D�� On00�0:O! V .�'� � \`��� � \
'I:II e f�n P�0 1�e r \ �\ \\ \
n.r..�ennev..e f- . � .
�e 0 �� �� �
n n� . � � � � � � � �'p • •
�Q�c.]Q�f.id�..l J ' '
:�� _ _ �� \ \\�
�au u u s � \ `
16yO � ^ '^ �� ``` 4 so. \\
� r � � �
�' � ; � `\ ��
� c' �
� Z .�� �� � �
,`Y �� \ i , �
�`� N\ � •�\\
r O ,\
\l'� O �./ \,����I= \ `�. �\ \
� \ I/ yy1���� I �
p �( � � � W • 1
,. %W�' �i � e
n1 �
'�'� �O: T 1�
0
�� . ,o `� � �i /�'
y / ,°/ '�'� /,/
ri
:�`+ ��' ��
\ Y o �' I /'
��---�—. � � � ��
� \ � -o- ; / ,
\ , b ^ I
\ /
(`\ o � �:
, � , j
� � ' � \�� ',�o. !
.
W \\ \ p
� / �.� p m���� / �
Qa � �/ �, n „ �i� i
� I p o n R � / /� .
Q / v� � ! h Yj w p ' ����
d ; a c //, i.m� cn Q �,r _ _
� /Q ' � i' / � ��
.� � ,� a o� O • - 'r�i �r � ;
r �/"' i
o°. '^I e �i 2 0 �' 'iL.�r�
n� e . './ Y � �:'���
Z r.
aO� "'/ Q � ',';/""/
� \' � „ �o w Y � ;i,/// I
� � ' � a " o �/� �
W `\ � J � 4 //� /� '
�\\J � .r u w o ,/�� %/o�j I _
� � ` � �
\� i ti / ? J o e'♦ �?/�/ t,�..{".
i/ ��
�\ 11�r� % � �j��„�
; / i
�` ol�,'', �i
,o c
u' � ���/ �
� �� i�
I� Q � �/ / _
I,." 2 � �1� i ',./�,(�� Z
'S' ` / j` i t
',�/ o `�o/�,,,(((�,�� �
/ �i�� � "' g�� i
�/ 1� W
� �l% � �/
I : � "�'
„ � , ; � � . � � ,�;
�o�- 9 E/.'�"� i
N� ! m /
n u i g / � /
� � z i i"���
¢��'"� � ,/� I
`�, �I y,' W ���/ r ,,
\ � ^ J_ '___— � 1 09i _ _,c�J-�.C���
� —{--, � _ e/
�'� � . c s� 1 � �i. �9 .• �
�� � \ �e� i t � �r, /`4�~— ----�
� ` �����
'a^� '� /. o� ��it.!W��-J ��� �\
g �'�� �,, �.yy^�e � �.�e, 's . s , o�
q ��,�+�� a
�.I. � H�,
W '!i� �/ d�gl� ^ �• ; °- � o� �
,4 1_ �� �-------�-� — '�
r \ S � y i
1 _ / �n �1'� 4 . W .
1
1 ``l� � s "' o� / 56 O � ;� 11 .
� � z a ¢p '� o l
� , 1 n J . yS
� �
i �.'.'1 �'I
r � / �' �� ,
� sn .�.o,., ` OQ 1/aO�OJ ,. �I Y� sL/f/sl ..a T �
er.s ..a�oro�a
�..��.� 1300W3d 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ �.,� •a..Y�
�
3
�
�
Z �
� � �
�
' i z3�
•t, i
w�J c
\\ �, d � �r9 '
.- .� � W �s
:� s�
V�f����, r : ,t s � ��
-.�� � �� � \
� \ '
4 � \ � � ��� �� �
�� � � ` �
a � ,� #� . ��\ ,� c��
b � `. \E � ,'� �
� k� �
� 5' \�� � t � �� \ ��
� m� ` � � � , ) \ � ``��
p � � � )
, ,
, U �
� �
. [ �..'1 � �� �� ��\ �
�',, �� 1
�, . �� " - � ��
j . f � � _ .� � \ �\ �
� `"� \� �o ' ��\\ \ `
� •'� `��• i ' � \ � ���'�
_� : � � ,m j I � \ �- \
�
�;�;� � � :o '; � � ` � � � '
S I
���;z � � � "�J[ \ �,� � __ kI � t ,
i i u�.o \� '•.; ^1 ► � i ;� f- � . � � - i: � �' i
.s. \ ��; 'd '° � -__ --fi— ,
, "
��"--'���, o� �,, �� o }-- -�-.`�� 1 � ` �::
i � �i � \ '� -' S �� � 1`� � ��' •
\ ;: . ('' - �
�\ (� �� �i � ,� � � S� `�t �� .
� I \
`.\` �,i 3 �� , �� \ `� �` �
) ---- i � r��� --= ��� � /
� ' �'F L - = //v �Y �...�
.�. . r ��
��\ ----- __ J =,- ,r\u'�--�—f— — i
� ° �� �\� ,��w��o unu.n� I
� � � I . - -- " �i
1 / \
� �� � ` R � � //\ �
// ��� � �� � ��� 1
--, // ���` �� �`i 1 � ,
i � �� � ��\ �� �
� � , \ l � � i � �
i � � , � 1
•� ��� '��,. � � �
I � -_ i ` � `�. ►
! � ������'�"�� � ��,
� � ,
i �, ___-; I �,�
' --'—��� 1 , � _
,�� �
, , ���--�- � _
; � �
;
;
_ _ .— ---�
' °r • OaVa0l0� IIVA � � � � .
�. ��... • u��/,i �o N �
""' '°"`°" l3aOW3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3010� ,,,,,, ...,,,.� a
�...�.�.,.�
�
�
i
�� ,
,
• ��
�'s ' _ �
�� � � '
� � � � '
�
� _ � � � �
� D
S
z
� \ � i
. � W I
= W I
W .
� < .
• � m , I
�S�� � �� Z � I
i-.
S E ' p�j � i
,3a � � W ;
• ��� •
�9
` � s
• �
i
� �'" � ;
,� , � �,
� _- �: � ,�
; � ��- d
� �� �� �
� ��
: S O
I �� � � .
; � ��; a :
' _� z � .
�� K •
W .
E
_ _ _ - --- ,
�
! � OaVaOlO� IIVA j -
�. ...".. :�nni ..a Q
"'°� "°"'°'°°'� '13aOW3d 3Sf10H �b3d N3alOJ
,�..�...,�.��.�
yi I V /w�N WI'
I _
I
f
3�
�
0
ti
3� �
�" \�
/ � t ♦
�
� �� � !
�N �O
�
4a
��
� �
a. z�
3p
� \ �N = {
� a
�� � � ��
-r �
�� � S
� � ' � ;
�_� o
� o
jM � I
�R C
� ��8 � , I
-
0
o '� � � � � � I
Rti � � z :
� � � , �
�� � �
3� w �
Z ° �� I
� �� �p �
�. �SR
, � �
I
� ;� �
' �� �R � I
i I
�r �
, A pr
� I
� k �� �
� � 5 I
d �
o'
�o
.J �
LL
� • I
_ • I
f �
�
� H d °
_ � 2 �
�c �< O~1 :
_ �
X -
W� . '
� .
_ . ' . ..
i_ _. . -- -- _ . _ -- — ;
.,.. . � .
- � oavdo�o� � vvn a ;
°'°` "°`°"°" 13QOW3li 3St10H �V3d N3alOJ .�,,��....,.� a '
� pyy���MU�M r7iai
� �
//
/ \ �
j
�' 4
< �� .
,,
.'�^�� �
�
,
�
; ♦
_ .
` ,�, � ♦
� � ���
€ �
� �
� /. `.
,
,
. � ��� ;
.Y;, � ,v%
� i
' , �'�
. ,
,
.Y �,
.,`,;-- ;:� :� ;
:� -� �
.o
. o ;
� .J
G '� �
\� ¢
/�� . � '� '
� ��. LL �
��, � . o �
,\ ` Z � !
�� � :
;
W . i
r � � �� p oono �
i� I
. .
I
� > I
�.
;���'� i
. ✓ ��� i
;
�t �
,< ,
�J
!d
. �
� �
� • .
_ ¢ •, �
� ! ' i
_ � �
H !
. C1 i
X �
W �
n on o
!
;
�
�
� 1
� - •
i �
' '� � oavdo�o� � iivn ;
� °1r'.e� ..o..o'�..o� � 'N�/6/n .�o a ��i
.�,,,,..,,�„�.� �3QOW3d 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ y.i� ....,.�
� ;� �
,
,
,�
� � I
,
� 4
< ��
,
�
��n�` �
, ��
� +
� �
.
. � \ +
, � � �� ,
� . ��
� �
, i � `>
� �
i
� ,
i,' '�
� y� A�''
< � � I
� ��
�
� � -
Y /,'.
,,
� ,,�� :< ,
J
a
�
'o ;
J
G ��
� I
' � �. ,� � �
`� \ 0 ,
LL �
� �
� \\ Z �
� � , �
�� � � • i -
� x
W I
� �� � o o�n a I
r , � i
� \ \
� I
��
, ,
,� j
�. i
/ I
� � �� �� �� I
� �,
�� I
i< �
:J
Id
' �
� .
0 .
S ��
,O _ ' �
Z �
/= !
' � :
X .
W
n on o
i i
{ '
1
�
� .
� �� 7 � -
i �QdaO t'•..' � ` �l�dn � _
zr/�/n �a Q �
� �R "'°"°'°'� �340�1I3li 3Sf10H �113� h'.3alOJ s,�� .�..,�
a+„w,,...,ew ou.wv�a�s
' I �
--� O� O�
'C!� �'u' �' li O- ---�
�� ��:..�. �� �@ 0 jI
o� i� - .�
=; _ ,� ��
�� ��� , --�i m
.�. �=.����. �� ,
; E �-�o ,� .� ---;��
� �� ���o ;; �� �id
�, IIW �
- �--�o �� �-= � ,
�;=,� E�. �� .�. ,.
1��=:. C.�..� ' - _ u, .
— - _ _�_� ; �i p 3 �
O ._. 0;�.
O� ��
- I�
, C� �!
- �, ��
i, '— �i
i�
� � ��, I
�
�_ �� � - �
,
o� � q
_�-�, �
�, �
c- iC:� i �
_s
���C�; I�; °,�, �i
� C�, ��W o 0 0 i�
,' ° \� n � O ��
/ � C� Ii� o
o ��� ----�N � a o ��
J = 0 0 �I
� �� o= L� O
I
� I�
I�
��
� - �= c= c_: -- � -- � --jl
� - � �� o� o�0 0 �I
� � �� �6-.,�� o ,�
I �
� u �; � °�o o �IK
, , o ��� m
: u ►� i
` �
, �� o o�.:� � ��
�
0
; I,� o
� o��o�- C�' I� '
! ° o c �j m o ��.C�C� IW I
° c � �.. �; �
C c c i r = - ��` ��t
; o ����� � i� �
o j!; o��. o,`= i Z �
�. O i d —�
` 0 I�W ° i
� �
' � --�1 w n
i , �t��= ���
. _ I
� -- oavaoios � iivn m
• �.. �.�: :wi n� ..o Q
'�'°'••�^�� '1340W3t1 3Sf10H �d3d N3�OJ =•�� •...�•�
,
�
.
�
, ;
•Y
<
/,�, � ,
�.. � `�� � ;
� m :
,,
i ;;`\-.,
�.� • �' '�
.t� � �'k��
/ � E . � =���
�
,. . ,,, .
�\ b �._ � I _,
� . . � �
� •
� � � ' i
� b �
Y I
. `\� � . ^ . ' .
�
� ! 1! i �Q �
� e
•
I . ��' � 1 � � .
\: ti ' I �
�
I . � � i ' _ .
I
� I
= I
, \j�, \ � ;
� \ �
� L_ '
\ ��� \ �t �R
I
s
�, . i . ;
° g I; ,
,
� � �
�` � - _� „ !
� — ,;, �
. ��:�
� " _ _ � ;
• , �
;
;
. ;
' `� OaVaOlO��`IIVA � � '
:.� �..4:: . +�....,� ..o
�•--�•-� 13QOW3a 3Sf10H �IV3d N3O�OJ :.�� ....,.� a
,
:
�
:z
�
1 � o
4,
�� ''�\ O :
� �� W �
\ �
��;`\ \ .
� � �
�
r' ,a �
� e
, � �
/. e s.
� �
« - �
�� �� • _ �.
g` el
'� � � i
ri
« r I ; I
, /�� ':/ i
N ;•
\ �; � '.�. � � � �
� �.;.
\ � i i
�,��_ � � �
i i
_.��, �_ � ;
g�, , A ,
�a � �
�' : �'..' I
�: � � �
/ • • • �
a � � i
•
I� = I I
I I ; ,
� \ -- �-�' -- '
'J I ,
r=
a %.
� � ��
�/ . � ,
� _.
L
,
' '
. -�„
�
�, .,�_ oavaoio� � �ivn �,"y, � �,
'�"�` �'^'�� 1340W3a 3S(lOH �V3d N3alOJ Zo�� .�..�,� a
�..�,,..,��.�
.
� �
.
e
�z
<
J
d
'-�\ � '
\ 0 0
� ;
� �
•�\ �' � �
�� \ �
� \ \
�
� .�
.'�\
e
w
i
� �I \`:
/ � �
n f'„
� � /� ����� -
.���� �
, `;�-;-, w° � � / I����ii��!'j
I '"ij.
� ���� � �'e � .�� �� � ji i�.
\ AI� Ii „
' � \\ �� q �{ I
\ 4 .
I I d I I
C�/1 •�a� ��; �.I'��i I�j
� / o � '� _!�,�� , ��.
q N I
\�������� j �i' i _ '
\. . _ �
�`��\- r� I _
��
. �
�
� � �� i
�\\ ��I -��,�%
■I
•� Z°�^I 'cl" �
° �I �I
I i� L ., II I I,�, i
� . . ; a ��� � '
0
' « N
= I
C '; �
�,, -_- � � � _ -_ - �
�_�___
; -_ �.
� , ;� , _
, ,�..._
,
;
oadaoio� � �ivn o '
r�ein� �.o..o�.�o� .iirit� �a r
.�....��-� 1340W3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ z��� »�•�� a
,
z
�
;d
¢
, o •
� o
;� _,
.
��<� ¢ a
. � .
' � i �` p -
/�' , N �I LL
'`� ,. /
� � �
��`�_ `_
• '� `
/• �"'�''�� ...
0 � � ,
c �� �
� � ��\�
�'� J
= s� �
" ' ^ =1
. :.
_ .
� ,-.- �.= _�
�i � e ;j; i
.\ . ;
� �
\
�
` j
� � .:
, � �� �
e
;.: ��, �.
r�
i
�
��
\ i il�� ,'
i�,l �,, I ,
� � �
� ',�,j'I �
; -�,
�p:�. I
,C
�
� ,� �� �
�. �
�
--- = ,.
\,, , , -=_-
� �-
� OaVaO'10� ` IIVA *�
�:n Q ..n wa�..o� � w�r.: ..o r'
•�•-.��-� l3QOW3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ Lo:� -a..�� a
.
� °
�._ •
z
<
J
d
� Q �
\ 0 i .
� O �
Y
r \ ti' �
� �
,
' � � '
� .
o �' �
�
V) 7
�()
r �
O "
`: � \
. .,
r ./ �
�j.�� ;��°,
i, �
� 'j .�,
;� `. i�
_—�
.� , �� �
� ��_
, �,�I / �
� ,
. � . , �
; � �,°�
� � �� �' i I
I� I -
,�'I'' ,i
�;
' i' �I � ';j '
�' 'i'��� � � I ,
.Ili���l;' �
���
I
�
— / - ___ ;�
� -= .
i , .
� OaVHO�O� �` IIVA N .
s,. ...��. ,......�� ..a �
"'°� '°"°"°'� l3aOW3li 3S(lOH �d3d N3a�OJ =��� --►�� Q
,a.wn,..,,ew�w.u�s
•
�� �
l�l i---� �
��
t "o
y � -_
�\ � i
/�� ��\ p �
/ � � �
��
�\
a �
»ti . �
;� . ���\
�
�
��. �'� ��
� �
. � �
�
� \
- .� y
, ,
';i . / i ,
, , ,� s /
;' � � /' '� � �:`
�� � � \ ..
;.\ � ,� i . ti. �
� ti i� ,� L .'
� � ` I
.,Sy //�....
--� � � �. ..
� � ,. ,��: I
� �\ i � �
'�. �� >
� i '�'� ' �''�
� � :'\�. ��
� a �
� I
� �
�•` � p I� I
T 1 I
\(�' I�Illl��.n —"_ II I�����. ' — -----1
\ i i II I I � i .
I! �
r------- ---�� --�
, _r_
� �
I -�
I
I � � L--t
I i
I �� '
I
I '
I
I I
�------, r ---1
�
L_ _
i
!
• � • . • •
� � • � • �
-�.- _� —
"s �_; a-_�, = � +� -- -
� '1_ i�uj=�r�ii:� `a
��,�=1�-- �� I����€�Il�il�l� /C .
"'a`� ,�a= _�
(�i�� I��r .��-i �• �
����i � ��_i i�_ :.�
��� �._1���=.�..= n
� !� '��;�� �'� i;
�� t—�= '�= —�
11� � ;�=1 ::� ■'
.�� 11 �== �==� ��� i I.
� 1�== �1�==��--=
_% �-
;�� � ����:�,__
i€�'� � ���� � �I��=.,
,�I� I -_ _ r � =1=l����
`���`����;a_i �
�� ,f�-�-- \
f��=1! _ �I
/
�
�
�;'�i ��=,�= 1�= ii�
= l�l; �s' 1�= ��' -
...� ! -_- �_ ��_ ■� •
�.. I��i: _ --_
��. ' '�= 1�=-
i� ��� '�!_; I��= ■�I
•�O� ���: �-I� • Ir��s n
ii•____.,
i�� __j =�� ,���ai�E�r`��li
/ ���II�
��F � ���
�j�'�j -��_� � �� �� � ��� �.
��'�f I��_ �-_ _ �► .�,i::,� ��� i::� I�::��
�1'!��.I,'+�,��� ����� ■• ��' n
� III����'� �.�����
�'y-�= �s_�!� •n--n- '�
1==1���_--_ - - ���_� ::� �j�l� .
! p�?� ' � � ��� ��-� �� �' .
I:1'_�_I,�°��?��_ .a��i �� =���,,I�
-�
�����!= � ■ ���. _ �i 1'�
1i��� � II�I I ��—�-' ■I._ ��II��•'•—�
�51,:�-� �l ° ■�_ ��u�o
�`� ��°' � _�.�..�.�� --_ - u
f�_ ��_ .•....�
''.,■II` r ' ' -■� ��� II,
-� - _— � _i�i`'II��Ilt!= I��=����II
--1_ �_� i
= - �=' ,� �� �i_I 1�= I�_'�
_ � ' ��_j =,-�� ' �j!�_'I�1�-1II�!_i I(�`�l��
_ �, ��_� �q •� �=� _' �.�'�,�i
=__,=-i I'�N •ai.� _—�._ � _I�����+.
I��_I �.� i
�!= ci J�.�j �r����: I�_ 1�- '�r—�—'i�
�=;�=1 i 7 � �'�1: ��= I�1��I�
�i�;�i;=1�_� �IU 1:= 1�:=1�1
�
�� � - _� =��-
, _• : - __
t� ,�; .�-��_��_,,. .�ce�
����;:a�a -
����_ ��Li�
oavao�o� � �ivn �� '
�� �,�,�w., . s.iris: �wo T
1lb6 �O JrO�R
•�••��-� �3aOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3alOJ =•�� -��
� ;
�i 3;
� �
�--;
J, - --- � �
' ��
; p � `i. � :
b
� ,. � � \S� $ � � W .
; � � -
, » ^ _ � � \\ WN �
� � '" � T=i p � �\ � � -
i �
:� � � H
i Q � 2
i � a
� O � ti ,�' ¢
ti --- - V %, ,� � � FS-
' s aWi � S � � z
�-- s � Is � ,R � � �
, �
1\\— I D aWi
,i I ---- -- --
�� .
� r
�
, Ik
��
� i
3 �
�j �� .
-- � —
r
_�_ _--_�_ __
� � � .
► , `\ ,
� * 1. a
e � � �.� m \ \\ + woi tov ~ � � •
♦ $ �� .m � �\ y � 09 .
-° I ff � � \ � O
Q \ �
S W
f- e a
Z N �
0
� �
_ s I� W / � Z
^. -- -- � � � s o ''� � F
° � S / + � � � W
~ • / p �
° < �
_ �— �,
�� �. _ _
' *�
��
�
, ��
�
. �
. �w'
,
OabaOlO� ' IIVA �
. �ie� .+o.��� sb/Lht �wa r
. °�•-TM�^�-� 1340W3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ z�v -�•�� a
�
�
>
J
<
2
<
W
C
<
_
Of
�
Z
\ n � '
• C7
"'� : 2 0
,\ \� � o
�� , a �
, F _
. \� , � j
� ` � i
� �. � .
� �� � /
,
3 `� \� ;j
.; o `,�
� `
.
., � � '` �
, � ,
� , l
� ��> {r \ .f� "�\��1/ 1 .
��' � `�
�'� �'�, �\ f � �<
•.� ,� . S, � r—�
1 � � /
� �, �. � � -
2s . �ti i
N� \ \\ � �� S � � � .
�i �_ �` ���� ,.�, ���`.�;� � a3 I � -
.�n ? ���� �� e�Y � � I ��1
i� \`-��� �� i� � � C
. � ' � 1\1 �� L� F
\•
/!��• ��; \' ' -� 3 .
�
/���� \\ �p . � i1
, �s� „ , . 1 � I
��= ; ? r
�
i r i � �, i
. i��l" ���`.1..����—�1������ _ --- _'1 ' .�
=__•— �=---- Ji
� � Q � �
�
�
�� l�
� Q
Y
a
� �
i �
'��
� �.
�
. 2 �
• \
�9
�3
' • � • •
. . FlL
E �
���
• PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
December 7, 1992
Present Absent Staff Present
Diana Donovan Gena Whitten Tim Devlin
Jeff Bowen Mike Mollica
Dalton Williams Andy Knudtsen
Greg Amsden Shelly Mello
Chuck Crist Jim Curnutte
Kathy Langenwalter Kristan Pritz
1. Starting at approximately 12:23 P.M. the Planning and Environmental Commission
was called to order for a joint work session with the Design Review Board to discuss
the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor
subdivision, a zone change and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for the
redevelopment of the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C,
Block 2, Vail Village, First Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condo Association, Vail Associates, Inc.,
GPH Partners, Ltd., Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
Mike Mollica summarized the proposed project and reviewed the proposal in depth
beginning with page 11 of the staff inemorandum. The specific items that were
discussed included the following:
1. The proposed encroachment into View Corridor #1
2. The projects departure from the Commercial Core 1 Zone District standards
3. The Tract E issue
4. The Los Amigos deck issue
5. Architectural design issues
6. Employee housing issue
7. The streetscape design issue
Tim Devlin reviewed the development statistics with the PEC per the staff
memorandum.
Craig Snowdon, the project architect, reviewed his analysis of the project with the PEC.
Craig felt that the overall impact of the project would not be as great as the
development statistics indicate due to his belief that if the peaks and ridges of the
inverted roof were to be joined by a flat roof, the additional GRFA added into his area
would not be perceptible from the Bridge Street area.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 12-7-92
� • �' J • �
� ,
The PEC's comments reqardinq the View Corridor issue were as follows:
Dalton Williams felt that the proposed encroachment does not meet the review criteria
for View Corridor encroachments and felt that the project would be impossible to
support. Greg Amsden felt that the "Riva" view is more important than the adopted
view corridor, however, he felt that eliminating the flat roof sections of the proposed
project would be positive. Kathy Langenwalter and Diana Donovan agreed with Dalton
in that they could not support the request for an encroachment into the view corridor.
Chuck Crist did not have any problem with the proposed encroachment, although he
felt that the building "loomed" and that the building appeared very massive as viewed
from Bridge Street. Jeff Bowen agreed with both Dalton and Chuck stating that he
could not support the requested view encroachment and also believed that the building
"loomed" over Bridge Street.
The PEC's comments reqardinq the proiect's departures from the Commercial Core I
Zone District standards were as follows:
Jeff Bowen stated that the building is too big and massive and felt that the project was
"way over" the Commercial Core I Zone District allowances. Chuck Crist did not have
any problems with the numbers but again stated that the building appeared to loom.
Kathy Langenwalter was concerned with the overall mass of the building and stated
that the building's proposed height was over the allowable and felt that the building did
not step back enough. She also had a concern with the doubling of GRFA but felt that
the number of dwelling units was acceptable.
Greg Amsden's concern was with the amount of GRFA requested, however Greg did
feel that the building height was acceptable as presented. Greg's belief was that the
site area was too small to step the building back any further.
Dalton Williams felt that the building had too much commercial space proposed in it
and that the commercial floor area was driving all of the other numbers up.
Diana Donovan agreed with Dalton. Dalton also stated that the only way he could
support the project was with the removal of the fifth floor.
The PEC's comments reAardinq the Tract E issue were as follows:
Greg Amsden, Kathy Langenwalter, Chuck Crist and Dalton Williams all had no
problems with this issue as presented by staff.
Jeff Bowen felt that Vail Associates should close the deal with the Golden Peak House
before proceeding any further.
Diana Donovan had a major concern with this issue. She felt that it would be
precedent setting by selling off a portion of the Agricultural and Open Space zone
district (Tract E). She further stated that if this does occur, that VA should be required
to dedicate the remainder of Tract E to the Town of Vail as permanent open space.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 12-7-92 2
^ . , • � �
r '
With reqard to the Los Amiqos deck issue, the PEC members had the followinq
comments:
Jeff Bowen felt that the Town should review the entire Agricultural and Open Space
zone district on a comprehensive basis.
Chuck Crist was in favor of a scaled-down version of the proposed deck, and indicated
his preference to review this project under the formation of a Ski Base Recreation II
Zone District.
Diana Donovan was supportive of a deck but felt that the dining deck should not be
located on Tract E. Diana agreed with Chuck with regard to the planning process.
Kathy Langenwalter was very opposed to a dining deck on Tract E. Her general belief
was that improvements should be located on the property that the applicanYs own.
She further stated that she would not support the Los Amigos deck expansion un�ess
the Golden Peak House actually owned the land under the deck.
Greg Amsden agreed with both Kathy and Diana and stated that the Golden Peak
House should own the land under the deck.
Dalton Williams also agreed with Kathy and further stated that the review process for
this should be the formation of the Ski Base Recreation II Zone District. Jack Curtin,
representing the Hill property to the west, stated that the deck encroachment in this
proposed area would negatively affect the use of the ski area (ie. ski race run-out
area).
There was qeneral discussion with the PEC reqardinq the architectural issues of the
rp oiect. Both the PEC and Craig Snowdon, the project architect, agreed with the
staff's comments regarding the architectural issues.
Dalton Williams felt that the skier access way to the Vista Bahn Ski Area Base should
be opened up more. He felt that the additional windows would add more vitality to the
street than the landscaping. Jeff Bowen felt that the skier access way should be
landscaped but should also be kept open.
Chuck Crist felt that the skier access way was acceptable as presented but perhaps
that the building should step back further to the east.
Diana Donovan felt very strongly that there should be vegetation and landscaping in
the skier access way.
Kathy Langenwalter agreed with Diana's analysis.
With reqard to the emplovee housinq issue, the PEC had the followinq comments:
Dalton Williams felt that the project should be reviewed using the "high end" of the
employee housing formula because the project is over density, and strongly suggested
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 12-7-92 3
. 4 �` � �
. .
,
using the 0.30 multiplier, for a total of 8 empioyees. All of the remaining PEC
members agreed with Dalton's analysis.
Craig Snowdon stated that the applicant has agreed to purchase two off-site dwelling
units that would be permanently restricted for use by employees of Eagle County.
Jack Cutin further discussed his concerns regarding the skier access to the Vista Bahn
area.
Jeff Winston, the Town's urban design consultant, presented his thoughts on the
project to the PEC.
Jim Lamont, the representative of the East Village Homeowner's Association, spoke
about the project. His belief is that the proposed SDD zoning is a "gross misuse" of
the SDD process. He felt that a total tear down would be appropriate in this case. He
also stated that the applicant should utilize the "drip" easements to bring the building
more into conformance as opposed to using this area for more development. He also
requested that the applicant analyze the 60/40 roof area percentage when determining
building height. Overall, he felt that the Golden Peak House should be required to be
brought into conformance with the surrounding buildings, and made smaller.
At this time, the work session was concluded and it was announced that the next PEC
work session for the Golden Peak House would occur on December 14, 1992. The
PEC had no problem with the request.
1. The regular session of the Public Hearing started at 3:15 P.M. to be notified of the staff
approval of a request for a minor SDD amendment to allow the addition of a bay
window to the Alpenrose Restaurant, located at 100 East Meadow Drive/Lot D, Block
5D, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Claus Fricke
Planner: Jim Curnutte
The members of the Planning and Environmental Commission were advised of the
staff approval during the site visit earlier that day.
2. A request for a minor subdivision and a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade
Village, to amend the development plan for the Waterford and Cornerstone parcels in
area A, described as follows:
That part of the SW t/4 NE 1/4,Section 12,Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the Sixth Principal
Meridian, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado,described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Interstate Highway No. 70 whence an iron pin with a
plastic cap marking the center of said Section 12 bears S 33°10'19'W 1447.03 feet;thence along said
southerly right-of-way line two courses
1)N 52°50'29" E 229.66 feet
2) N 74°38'17" E 160.70 feet;
thence departing said southerly right-of-way line N 88°45'57"E 138.93 feet;thence S 40°45'14"W 94.32 feet;
thence S 18° 18'36'W 54.08 feet;thence S O1°21'36'W 205.02 feet;thence S 12°07'36'W 110.25 feet;
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMM�SSION MEETING MINUTES 12-7-92 4
.•�' .., �
�2• �- qz ��?�,,. �-�,C f�� - ��C �� 5-�-�.
`^'� �-P �I�.�� -
� �/�� C d�n -1��
(�A��a.-� a � �-�. � .� ��.. .
.��a..�e � ���.-�I
SG � " s i��
,u�(�. - ' 2,�-�. ,�:�,,.. -� ��-c� ,r.�.�-�..� _ �,.�.�=�
� �-P _
� i��- �,
� �,�, L� /,'L - - �. .,�� ��-�.,--
�y��
n�j ,� _ ,,
�,�.� �� �.�. — Na �—� _ ,-� ,���« �'� 1
�y� ��
� �� , �,�. �-� �- � ��� k.�,;,, t/,�.�:w.�
�3�-- � �,13. - ,,._. ��-�. �-fl( G'�� - c.�� �
°��- � ,, ,���`
. . ,,
_ - _. _ _ ... �w � � � �.�-•- �-
;
�
.:�. .
� Z�„�:,.�, -��-.�.
� �.� — �� ��-� � �- �. � �-,�,-.Q — -�.( ,��.
�,-�. � c�..� _
�� c c - 1�6 w� ,� ���- - 2°� � ���, ���
,, �.�
.�-.�.
� �[, - M-� �-.�.� � ���'� , � � �
�-�.c � .� � ���. ���-�=� � �
... ���'a�}- .� �. G�•r�.,_. -� � ,c:�-�.. � oK.
.. ��,- � � 22°.�-� ,� ,��-e � � ��-�.
d��l��? - e.�-�— .� �� �'09�. f-/.���` .� oK , S�
,�z ��r �..,-.,-�1 �' ��- �� i�/� ,
e���v — /''? �� �.L ' — � %�-�..� �
��
.�.a-2 � �e �R F�� '�`�-y�, ' ' �
�� , � — �;� �..� ��-� _ �
� - _
. I� w � � �
�J o�-G�`cr- - �l..P.zr�.�.-e. .�P -5� -' .2�� �
G�G�,on �
_�� l/ � e:s�,.�.� �/Z�.
�� � G�" °Z�-G�e -�v»�*-� ,��
� Tico�� � .v�-we
� �� — Nd ��u�. �.
b� �,'L - � " '` � .
, �
� cC - " �' " ` •
� ��3 - V A- ���n.-e-� �� G�� �-�
� � w �o ,
-�� �� -- � .� ' � �-� �-� �� ��►
���"•-- S/I-~-�e° '�-� "r ✓ ' ih�� �� d�^�°w`'�
� v�
- � � �.�� � � .�
�-o v, � �-�-�- � . -
� �ts ��w,c�oS �ec�
�I
�B - �co1.v �-e ..G.-.�{ �s c� 4'►- � •
� �
�o� �,�..�.�..� - a�- �-e--� ?�--�- .i:t�a� G��e�vz` �2
�•
.,�.e � �P � �-.. �•e .�4 �� �.Q-.�
c c. — � r,,. G� � �. ,a���. -�- ���� � �
�� ���- _ � 5�4 %3a..e ,2,�. � �
��, - � �� � � �--z` �- 7'�-�- �.
__--
f��.�. = T3 f�l � .e��: �t'� �. %��
��� ,
,:� �,� � � � �!.�,--� � �'.�-� �.
G� .� .ti.� �P �...��. .r�w �
�� � — ��`'`�� �C al�:u� o►-, e.�'`r�• � .
w�l � ��� .�� � P� � ..�
_ ��.
�
� � • p
' O
G A - ��� �.-/ l�' �' �.�►-s. . !r�- .a���..� o�
� B x�
� �� � v�ev� ,vz m, , f�Le� — l�0'�^2 -
- � w _ /�,� �� ,�e � , �--� a�� �-/ _
--- K �. -
� � T�
_ �� �� �
� c,� s. ,�.� �-.
._ ��a� P��Cp � aC�
,�
�� ��
�w - a� .� � �. � � � .� .�. �,
�� - � �-.�.-�. � .,�� � `°� '� �,."
- �G - O�� , .�� e� ���:�., �� �rb-�-e � � �.�e.-tC
��t ,�, � � - � .�c.-e. �.�� �-e- ��Gi��j-- .G:-.. ��:�.
����
f�. � — /q.� .,.-/ �.�r� •
�
�.. � �.
�'iZ�..y - �✓.e ,wL� � G�� �av�e �J�.ci,
..�, �,, / �.f� �e � —�' o� �-- - .�-e
��� `��M�
_ ... � d, 3� - � g ,
.G. A . - �y�.� „�� �j d.�--
K. �, - �, -,
c.c, - � ' ,
.s.�, - '� '' - �.f,�,� � ,w�,�;� � 7'dv �
.�,�, -
�� �,
;�
•, �' • �
: �
6 �
��. - w� w� .� ��. � �-�..� � � �'�
�.., . �
K� - d�""�_ '� �`� G�``"°�'
�,,� �,X-,a„r. - .a.�C.�� e►�ca.� .h ,�;,�._�
�� �,�.�o-�`oY- ` � /�2���
V
�. ,C n....,Y-� — ' i�e�.:�, �ro�/, � � Il,�.�G'.�s�,� /�.�e.�.,,.-�..,- 3¢.�Q.rc.
���c� � i
- G�.�. ��-e � s�� z� T� �-�- �
d-�-.-� �►�- .
—!1� �2 � �� � ���'-,�-�., _ -.�--�a-
- , ,,..e-�'` �'e ���'�"�e .
— .[1.� �'e (d�-�d � � �f .� .
- T�e G�� ��� � G��-� � � ,�-
,,_.� �� . ��.� :�
_ _ _
s.�� �� - �,�.�
K� - oK, .���-e � � � �� cc� .
a.C�;cec�
'�'LF�' � _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
,�
;;'
,;
�
a�
(
I
�` '
, r ,�r � �I � r
. �
� �
�'� � t� �
1 8��,,,,
; , ���'
� �,����c ��S-
� •1 � _ 1
.�-�� ►5 � � �l - �MC�O� o�Pt' �ow�,�n . r.� �4�1� n
�
�I`r��� �/�li'{�� '1�-��� i��,�l u.- �/mJ- 'l��� S��' �` M t- �m.l '�
1
l� -
�
,
��� � > ;� t� � �„d. a�- � i �. C�.��:,�
y - ,
15 Cl.. Q�'D�I�r\ - �.l �1`�� �,N�i` 1��i r� ��Q Q l,l�
1 , �
�
,�- `(1�,1) ' Q1v'�C�- ��'� �� p�� �1 -� C�1Yl a��
C�1��►r� b��- �: � vv,,� � � Y�a�
�O,�Q - � ��J� �� C� �i��1v�- ��� �,c� z
1 �
�� ��P �� � � ca�.� -�r 3-� �1 �
� �.d.-�
� �
, C � '�� S��
n - li� �j� D� �p� t'�( �� . D�
1 �
� �J
�0.�IN1 � �� , �'Oti ��c
�
^ ��� ��91� ,Y�[iU�l 4'r�
�i�- b(�1 � - h� ��, � �4�-� �c�e-�{
� L��� k��- � '
i���a�Q- 6�--• r�v� reatl� o�-��,.�- l� �i�- �, � a�-
� ' � c� ,
�J� �� �t� ���
_.
�� ��QC.� � '
���v - ?��.- 11��^�. � �S a�c� ' �c.c��l1
t
�-�- a��
Lhuc.�.j. ��-
.��. �� ' _
a- ��-�d- ���.� ���;� 1�,►� �'n �.�.�--�� �r� �'�.
\�2c� CCNv`� ��� C(N�r �i�'r�c�� _ `t� ��l ,
�' - �
�
�a� � ���- �- Ca�'�. � �-1 _
� -
�.►
�,,, ? ,.
• .
r` � � '�^�I�'� f1� �-c.+C '�� �-Q��� �-�''\ � � '
� �
, �
�
- �-�.- ' -Tj�L� �''1 � C , T(.t(,l�,tr � .
� /��
_ ' U
`(� �a�o u���� � an �
C.�,��-- � g - 5� � �.�
. �
�1�,N�C�' C� ' �1.�� �o �,t�!'�.�� , � ��� �� .
�,d�
1�� �,�cl � ... y � �?1�� c� �.c� �
� �, ��
)� �-���� ���, .
��� � ��� �o� -� �- � ��� ���—
�
� ��►.�--� � �L �e.- a��,�L� 6vl k.__
S� u-- v �
��- �-� � �1,�,�.�. �-e-�,�'r
, - � . � �
l��� �.��� '.`-
� - L� �,u.la-�. ��.►�- � �'�
. �
� - wu�.l�- �e.- �� �o� �—
Od.���-� � ��'S_ (��z�(lQ.� t���� C, ��
�-
) �
, �� ���� �
�- � � � � �r� ��-�� u� c�c��
� � c� c�— �n��,��— �2-�� �
_ iCL �` tY�Cts, � �-P� O�. 1��� ,
. �
� � � GQ-� � c� ��1�5 L�'uV1`M,��
� � � � �,, a,, , ` ' .
' �i� �t4�U � � l f� U� ��� � '
���" � -�--��--����.�.:�. �,
���
C� - �e.� u���o� � ��
�
C�1 � �
�� �� y���
��
ls�►►�r�,�� ��� �31 ��� 5�u��,�- ��
�� �
� 5��, � �� �.�.
z� �t� �����f�
�� � U� s���� �
. ` # • �
,
i ac� � C�CU�� a��� � �
'�do �� �1�,�-- 1c�vre.� �.ac.� � � ���^, -
�
;,
� , - -
.
,;
-- , - -
---�—
;�, � � _
;�
�.; —
,�
f�
__
i�
i,
,
i'
- -;------------ - - - - -
---- --� ---------- - .
i •
�Vail� ��
,�
� Vail Associates, Inc.
Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver Creelf� Resorts
Hand Delivered December 11, 1992
Town of Vail Community Development
Attn: Mr. Tim Devlin
Mr.Mike Mollica
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Gold Peak House
Dear Tim and Mike:
This is letter is being written to clarify the position of
Vail Associates, Inc. ( "Vail Associates" ) with respect to the Gold
Peak House redevelopment (the "Redevelopment" ) and the expansion of
the Los Amigos deck (the "Deck" ) .
Although Vail Associates, as the owner of Tract E, Vail
Village Fifth Filing, is required to be a party to the application
for the Redevelopment and the Deck, Vail Associates is not
proactively pursuing approval of the project . However, Vail
Associates supports the Redevelopment subject to compliance with
Town of Vail requirements.
With respect to the Deck, we are willing to negotiate with the
developer for the expansion of the deck.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Vail Associates' transactions
related to the Redevelopment and the Deck shall be subject to the
proponents' resolving all outstanding issues, such as zoning and
protective covenants, to the satisfaction of the Town of Vail and
Vail Associates .
If you have any further questions regarding the position of
Vail Associates relating to the Redevelopment or the Deck, please
let me know.
Si rely,
2������
drew P. Daly
President
cc: Peter Jamar
Ron Riley
Craig Snowdon
Clark Willingham
Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA— (303) 476-5601
� i
�Vail<; � �'�`°��G,h
c: �C'
Vail Associates, Inc. � �
�
Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver CreelP Resorts
November 23 , 1992
Town of Vail Community Development
Attn: Mr. Tim Devlin
Mr.Mike Mollica
75 South Frontage Road
`vcaii, �v �iv'�7
Re: Gold Peak House
Dear Tim and Mike:
This is letter is being written in response to the request of
Craig Snowdon, architect for the Gold Peak House. Specifically,
Vail Associates, Inc. ( "VA" ) has been requested to provide written
confirmation that VA and the agent for the Gold Peak House, Clark
Willingham, are negotiating for the sale of certain parcels of land
owned by VA to accommodate the redevelopment of the Gold Peak
House. Such parcels are located adjacent to the Gold Peak House on
Tract E, Vail Village Fifth Filing (south of the Gold Peak House)
and a part of Lot c, Block 5-C, Vail Village First Filing (west of
the Gold Peak House) .
Although VA basically has no objection to the redevelopment of
the Gold Peak House in concept, VA specifically retains the right
to review the plans and any accompanying zone change or amendment
relating to the redevelopment and express any concerns and/or
objections VA may have regarding the project .
If you have an_y questions regarding the position of VA
relating to the application for the Gold Peak House redevelopment,
please let me know.
Sin�,erely,
,
,�2Z�
drew P. Daly
President
cc: Craig Snowdon
Clark Willingham
Post Office Box 7 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • USA- (303) 476-5601
1� �� �" . . ;
, . � �
� Real state !
� & Homes
No�e�ntxr 20,1992
� ---- ,�p .� �
.,ti� / y� �`— �i � �,�
, � �
�
..;��,. � ��; "��, i
�.r<',. �
�� ' �' �� �' '� i
r.�� , - . r ��. S�''k-
= �. �ri�,� `'z�'�� �o-—..s .. , . ' � n.�
�i. � ... � ,-. � � �} �� i,µf �..
�_��"�'_"�.. �'� r e�� �����•����°�� .
P�3-�" ^ --. -c�r ��g.
�r S^, f i '� �7 i i ��" s " -i'�°' e ` "
.. ���^. �� . . 4 s���t,,=;�,� ��. �
� :'Y'�' � �� ( F.� C, � �'� �<�., o
� ,,.� ��� � `"'�'``-.. ��'` � �,��, �
��F� �i F� �* � �.� �.a,a., .., .. ����� ��:, � -
:� � '�z,� I t� �� _� L 1 r "'i � � �,.� '�4a � � #`` �.
,a r
.+� �.w�;r . r°"` � .�, r �«
� � �4 �"i� '�� �+� �; �.� K+ '�Z t;. �" �.: e n��-�
��-- i �.iy� ��,� �,$ � � �� � za �. . � a�� �r ��,�s � g'" j
„ .
�� �":Y�"��� }���� """"'e" �y�'...;.�.�� ��� .
._w �{ � . .. � ++�
� ._ . .:w .,.
� . .
K •_� �� �,
t
s # "m."Ty.
� ,
�
� � _, 'a-"a- ,r�a"�^ r .s` y�zX� ..
I
. d �. . x },-.�.��'�'Te�-r,.+,.
.�� i P. ���R����� �t � 7 �'
4
w}y'{i�+Y ,�`A "�'., r� �E 2.
-���'�m'�.§��� } p�n+.t, `,� g.' m ,y � �p� �x_�p � e
. ��� �� �i iy A.,tA k � r' 4,��y R3,
fy� ,y�, �
Y, at�ri�Y" �'"`a?x��� .aa..�i ��"UY?�?sn&;;�.V,s,i
The stakes on the rool of ihe Golden Peak House,showing how high ihe reconstructed building would be,can be seen in this photo
from Bridge Street.Photo by Allen Best.
Golden Peak House readies �or
� �ear-do�r�, r��e��e�p����
By CONNIE KNIGHT with the other condo ownere At an October PEC work ses- abundance of copper tlashing, recommended by the PEC end
A proposal to raze and rede- who are already there?" he eion,Diana Donovan,chairper• not unlike the towering build- appraved Uy the town rnuncil.
� velop the 26-year•old Golden asked. aon,expreesed alarm over the ings in IIeaver�}eek. The PEC will visit the site on '
Peak Ffouse, located in the "That'e pert oCthe tricky chess coneept of VA aelling open "I don't think wc'll evcr get 11�esdey,Nov.23,to view addi-
premier location et the top of gume here.A lot of the unite are epace W privnte enterprise.She like Beever Creek,"suid Snow- tional etnking the developer ia
Bridge Street, is before the be9ng combined.Some wodt be also indicated the proposed den."We'll never deteriorute the plucing on the emisting building.
Town of Vail pinnning&Envi- (,ouched, but they will sll be building looked too mnssive."I villuge.The chnrm nnd acnle is Mother PEC work seseion will
ronmentalCommiseion. brought up to code with nccess think maybeyou're pushing the in Lhe erchitecture, nnd you be held Dea 7. The proposal
Although sorely in need of for the handicnpped,elevntors, project e little too far,"she said. don't have to keep building could go before the town coun-
_ upgreding ae determined by fire sprinklers,new daors and Snowden udmitted Lhcre are heights to two and three stories cil on Jan.5.
the Town of Vail'e maeter plan, W�ndows. aix areas where the building ex- to be successCul. "Thnt's etill pretty quick for a
at isaue is the masaiveness of ceeda CCI(Commerciul Core I) "I think nn SDD is a very np- big project of this size," said
the building ae it hae been de• etnndurda. The propoaed propriute use, because you've planner Mollicu, who is sur-
eigned by Craig Snowden oC building'e height,common aren got n building that cun't posai- prised there hns been no public
Snowden and Hopkina archi- aquare footnge, site coverage bly comply." ou[cry ebout the redevelopment
tecturel firm in Vail. ��I don't think we'll flnd density are all in excess of Also ut iseue ie one of Vail's considering ite locntion and the
The euiating building,with ita ellownble zoning.Secauae the premier view corridore. Held bulk of the building as it is
unusuel inverted "buttertly" CVEI'gCt IIICC building is exceeding¢llownble ancred by some,manipuleted proposed.
roof,already exceeds alloweble Beaver Creek." aite mverage ns well,less land• by others, it will be tweaked Only Jack Curtin,represent-
gross residential tloor erea scaping ia proposed. [n eddi- once more if approval Tor the g,.e.�.ctp�e
� (GRFA)by 200 percent. —Archited tion,londing berths fuil to meet propoeed Golden Peak FIouse ie
"What the re ro osin ie Craig Snuwden �
Y P P B town requirements.
almoat 300 percent;eaid Town The building preaently ex- a 7,�
.� of Veil eenior planner Mike ceeds in all thoae cntegories," �aC�IOIZS IYIIXP.0 a�7OU�
Mollica. eaid Snowden."Mything we do
As proposed,the building will ^It will really be more erc- ��t ie obviouely going to make prospeet of new building
be 51 feet high.Three edditional cient. The huge ramp in the �t more non-conforming.
eondominiume will be added �enter will be converted to a big "I think it ia better to ecek nn
and the size of Los Amigos etaircase leading up to the seo- SDD(apecinl development dis- �y}�(je Vail residents hnve not I go over there but they don't
Resteurant will double. ond Ilaor hotel lobby.Los Ami• Mct)thnn to go aiter aix vari- Appeared nt Vail Plnnning& listen.There ehould be a guide-
Commercial epace in the lower goe will have its own entrance ances,when you're lucky to get Environmental Commiesion Iine,like in Europe,where they
levela will expend. on the west eide of the buildin one npproved° meetin s to voice their o mions
"I'm not poo-pooing the g Snowden nnd his artner, S P don'C cnre w}�o you nre. 1'he
through double doors and a P publicly,phone cnlls reveal they rules nre enCorced even if
nmount of equnre footage,"said e�r�. Pam Hopkins,redesigned the nre concerned about conlinued you re the president of Austriu.
Ron Riley, president of the �e developer,Clark Willing- Garden of the Gods building on expnnsion in Vuil Vilinge.
Golden Peak House Condo- ham,ie negotiating with Vail �re Creek Drive, which wus "I would love for the Golden �If they don't watch it,they'll
minium Associution and the pesociatee to purchese VA also built under a epecial devel- peak building to hnve u new �O�the chnrm oC Vuil.Vnil will
primary commercial lease- property edjacent to the eki opment district laet yenr.Con- design,but] don't wunt it to ���ke a womun with too many
holder But we ie atnggering slopes at the Vista Behn.A trade troversiel becnuse of i[a mus- block more of the mountnin," facelifts—atretched so much
the building by stepping it back �g g����ng mnsidered. siveness,the proposed Colden sa9d Elizubeth Eber,a Vail resi- �here's no personality leR"
to minimize the impact on "VA may take epace for pri- Peak House closely resembles dent(or Che lnst twoyeurs. And Jim Cotter, whose jew-
' Bridge Street:' vate eki echool students to Che Garden of the Gods archi- Sheikn Gramshammer,n 30- elry-sculpture gnllery hns been
According to Snowden, the meet," said Snowden, who ia tecturnlly. yenr resident of Vnil,ie tired of on Wnll Street since 19G8,snid,
existing building hns 18 units, hoping to preaent a letter to the Both nre five stories with Arguing with the town."Well, "Vuil's probably the only town
but mning allowa for only four. �N,n indicating VA'e interest in wow1.etone und stucco exteri- Whnt cnn we do nbout it?"ahe Cearing down new�buildings to
"What are you going to do ����ng or trading. ors, dormer windows and an asked."Pepi(her F.usband)nnd put up new buildings"
� ^T
, • �
� � b � g � Q. d � � � '��' G p p'� d � � o � 3 u ~ ,� w •� � d y G� a�'i � ''"'' a�i ai
. . ,� '�' a`'� a�i 3 �a � '� �a.�i o '~ o m .�.� •^ N � „ � $. .� � �' .�" '> a � aFi m �
� `g � •� N � �^' � � � � �" +' d � � `� � � � � � •� � � � �.�'°. m m �eo=° � ° •� o0
� � � �w � o � � d� � dw .� � o � o � .� �v° •� 3 � �' a, � � �,� � -k � �' � � .� �
.�.. . �, •�, .., >, d d „ a ... � m � •..
cQ `� m y p +' � p+ a� � 3 � � .=: .� � m d d V � CL > - m � c� --� � °� � �, q
y �: > ,w8 � � .� d ,�, o .cd eo$ � •� � o � � a �, � � � d a. °'S .cooa � �, a� �
,G � �� � 4; oo � 3 � ,�,,, p „ 4D 3 a at � o � m xi k � +� � c� r.., y� � y., [��+ � � � a� Oo�
q C> • O a 'C � U Y �-r m ^ O d a� 6)
.. w x eo.°pd, • d g d v �- nn o � d � o � � a� � ,a a.�c..' � 4. ,n ;� � o q a�
.s Co � q � � o '° � 3 � �' y*�' � .� � ,,�, `�' > � 00 U • � > � ^ � .� o a a � '� � y 'n � c�i 0 w
� � a � � S3oybd � � d � ,, .� d c� `° 93 �; S ,bbA •m � •� ,n � � '�� ,ty � : "' c,,,�' � 3 °' .c
'� cd �., ,,c d .� „� e� � � m w �e,,� a d . '� .ti � on ,ti d d � �. ->,..a -o � �' °' � "
� °ptia`"i °' � ti3 � o � v � � a o a .bs. o �e � � > � .mm ,c .x �, o o � �,
u � • u � .c a cC d '�-� : y o .`C�' ,� m •-• � m R � d cd a. a m � d � o, G�
� �� �+ .� � d E"� y � ,k•5 ,C. •--• Gj .'= Vi 3 ,� m O ��.s .SC d � d a0 � � � d -y 'V a V � W
� a� �..�.^, � •� : C..0 o � � � x ,� U y � � V2 r.�, °�'� y ~ �� � � y V] ai O tvD-'"' a�i q o a�i C�i o � 'ti7 a'" ,,
- 3ca3� .a.n o � uc�i � .av, .� a� � a.� G� � Um � � 3 � .� bcab 3 � 3 � .� o �
� N � d � � r aAi b � y,�'o� � 'ai� y � a�i � .� c0 � .°; �j,'� c� v q � � �+ p =., ' a� q y p m
4. .,, as ... d �' � - o.� � � -� o � � � -C °' ti w ti �
� o O � .0 'J OD� � "Ci m a�i a�i q +� � � a4 �oi cC p"C> '� � � � 3 � � � � � � .0 �^d � O
� � .� > .q � � q � '� Y m � " 'd � '� � "°�' 'b°' q +� m °�' "' � G � � ° � o � A' °' 3 °' o c� �,
d
o � �'�c, " .x a� : � ^Ti j' 3 > -�s c. o m ca 3 a a �, C� �,.a
q � w .� � op p. � F A oc y m d g o o �, q � � y q � .a � _o � � °0 3 0 -d : d U
� d x � d � � .b °' m q m ��^ 4. q � U � � N � u s. ai,� � � � � ,N G, � ,� d
p � ,, .o � y � � ;,� br�O , � da� nqo� � � dw � � d � o �a � xG ,xbY �
� ,..^.,� � � � 3 OD CL w ,�" b �..� � q �. � � � �t0 '1 N � -p�' y >'.,�.�.� 'C p y h '�' � d y •�y a�.� O v � � o
ti � � o o _ y •� m c� : .� � � � � � � a c7 p d � �'�- '� � • � .� � p
� c, `►t: d 'JC U 3 � C7 .s� �. '� '' '� � � +� ,� v d c,� � as � � N ,� ca
y q � (�] o � � w °� ,b o a' � �� a� m . a � � o d ., no � �, a �� d a�'i � � �,
�3 � � °: 3 O � Q� q ,Q � y d � o 'C N d °' � „ N ;, � � >, c4 3 .Q � „'.�C. � 0 1-. C� i. .b .
� g �; � ' d � -� ca � Y .a � a, �., 'b � .a d ', �a � m w 3 �v °� � � ,;�� � � s� s�..s� � „ y �
\� 'v '� >+•� a+ � 3 a�i " 'b q � � � .'� °' o y °'`� d � d a�i 'o a�i �o Ei ,� � ,.[ '� � � �, �° � � � d a "" � � ,c
� c`y ,ns � � � �. ,�,� d � wao � 3q �.x � �. q � a �' � �' ,� da+ a� � d � w -d � °' � ° 3
�.. � Va,•o° -d °�' � c, � � 3 '° ca � � .� � .� � �q � ,°� � „ � � v � � � a� a � � � 3 �, °a .'rocx �
� � w o �Q o � .,� � d "q� � d � �, .c :b ^ �;•=' � c6 A � �j� � a�i � N � s. � d u° ;� � ;ti °o °a � � � a .�
t� � N G'' .[; �"' O � .-+ C '� C y �" v t"' C/1 ��" � Ol
•.. A. t� u rn W :C .4 � .�E aD � 3 m � .,. o .� LL c� �i .Q m � .0 � '.:+ > .� CJ .� � .�, m � C�DU m a ,� .
�
�� -
.. ,
J
���' �y �
Itk�.v,��6!
� 1 � ����.
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 303 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657
November 16, 1992
Mr. Mike Mollica
Assistant Director of Planning
Town of Vail Dept. of Community Development
15 a�utn r�rontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Mike:
In response to our telephone conversation of last week, I have
apprised Clark Willingham (applicant for Golden Peak House) of the
probable need to bring in an outside consultant (Jeff Winston) to
review the Golden Peak House remodel . As noted in the applications,
the cost of outside consultants is to be paid by the applicant. Our
understanding is that this fee may be in the $1, 500 - $2 , 000 range,
and in lieu of a deposit to be held by the Town to cover these
charges; the applicant will be responsible to pay the invoice, when
it is received by the Town of Vail .
If this is not your understanding, please let me know.
Sincerely,
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
Craig N. Snowdon, AIA
Partner
CNS/slh
` � p; �Fp �y�������"��Nc,�
�
,-� .-, �
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW , ��l
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: -
,,
_ , � � �.:':_
i- ;.._ . - .. , _ ,�, . J
� �;j Vt���'�a��o�. �'��a.��,���tiT 5.�� SDO /1i°P���A7'�a��%
:
PUBLIC WORKS
Reviewed by: Date :
Comments :
FIRE DEPARTMENT
--��
Reviewed by: �� <<�" Date : �2 ' �' �Z
Comments :
��./ _ � , �,� ,�-,
/�,�Ln, c-{���-h'"� �"" ;' 1�✓'�'''�✓�
�� �"'�.� /
� � ���` _-. ��� /
��,%,�.�sC D�n. '"/ l� �.
( �
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by: Date :
Comments :
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by : Date : �
Comments :
l
� - � � • � �� � � a �
- � U�
a �
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 23, 1992
SUBJECT: A request for a site visit and discussion regarding the establishment of a
Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a
zone change, and an amendment to view corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak
House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, and C, Block 2, Vail Village ist
Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail
Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
!ry}::ii:t4iTiii}ii}iii ii:O:+.u.�:ifiii::ii•:i:itv::i:ii'riiii:Yi� •iiF4?iiY
:i:<
+4:iiiirS'l�'�nvui>'i�iS��•w4iii)i:v.iY•�'•iwfiiwv•iS:'n.i��•uwiY�i:.Y•i.viii24N.iY.+w>'�'�•xiiiTiiY+iYi�wv.iiiiiG:••viw�wt:�iiuY:4i$iil•i»'ul•iiiiGi'•i�:i::v�'•.w�i:ii�'�i+»iCi'iie?>3'•i:v::%siil+J�ti�iiAUiw%�w4»kit:w4i]id)i>i'+�'�w'�L�'.�L�Y�f'•Sii$bS�iSiN iw:ii>l�i>Y.iw ii L::i�i':�iiv4iivUSiiS:4�
I. DESCRIPTI�N OF THE REQUEST
The intent of this site visit is to initiate discussion between the PEC, DRB, Community
Development staff, and the applicants with regard to the Golden Peak House
Redevelopment. /"
II. PRELIMINARY ZONING ANALYSIS
The following is a Preliminarv Zoning Analysis for the Golden Peak House that is
intended to identify the project's departures from the CCI zone district standards.
These standards are identified in bold type.
, r " _ ;!►
; .��'6�f��N �c'�,� 1%�li'aF �`d�Y�i�H�,�'Y7� � �� Z3��1 Z
i;� ,
�
;j;P�';�G���<<v�f�y �r�il-�� }�N�� ���� �i. 1 a� Z
�I; �� �z/�/9Z
��� � —
-- ���ul�����. l�`�,��GNf1Vu' �x��T�l�d.7 /�j�=r'��/) _
��`>�;��f�.cr��. ���� Z /��✓�ci �1�:� �
;;; ----- -_-_. _ _,___.� .
�:
. ;;
51TE ��/�: '�' D,IS Ac?�"s a� G.9Z�Sr �S�r��� o��9 ���� .�� B zi9 sF
- ,.
;;,
jc��f;G�S ' 's�L��: l�f�E'- �c�r.r�'� — /V'U-6��._ /�l- O� FT. --
;�
lI,Q�N ���<'f��;G�'E �•h:N ti�✓: Q- �' FT_ �l' l�- I� �
� s' ���Fr g,� p_ �s �- -
iii
�' o s- i, .� �,. �- o,s- !. � �T
�:;
�;;
�fl��'%%.7': :�c'I? % ��j: G`�-r' l..�SS �%; ��' �f: r?��=�a' ��� : �� �f_ i�/,��t'�
, ---—
-- --�:,--�_��"_��%-�l"y� �r - - _- -��'��L-3��—�'^��-- ---'`'��T;—��F��19�!�-_
i;
f'��t11 l4fCJ�'�/ � � /.�'t �J 5� 02 a��� 6,S�� 5F a�z ��8 9� ' �.6�3 SF a 2 ���r �Q
��C``f� - ;�; c� ��:���t�' ���� ' ! q3`� Sr a,� �:��s Z ?a E 5 r�R �'�la '
�,
. �;; y6�� �f ���aEQ T �.�F � 38z s� Q��t-� ,a ��F�►
�.
�;�
�,,
t� � � � �s,�a::��.�
/'�P�.�: i;� ,,sti� Sf a�z SQ9_'� BTq�B sf l� /9i SF
�'' E�cE�s EX��:S
�;; f y 63 I 5� �.�:��� �f 382 5F CQ,�f��,v
,j I t 3}��`1 �F o2 19b Ia �-l�,`�9 sF orl- �Z��o
�;!
i�I
l
UN!TS : �i! Z� uN/f5 Pr� �G�`F I� �/�F/T j � �N/TS' :
Ii�
i'i o ,R ��z fkE"��'E � f�t/ � Z
��
�
�LTE Cov �E��':!�i y 5 5 a2 0 � S� a� qZ 9a �SRS F o z 2.
--�� 4) �
i�
_ ,�
!����P� : II �� ��� �« v,�«y�_ _ _ .
�--.-r- �--
i,� �i�����Sf7i1� l'1/�lV___ ______ _ _ ��NTII�l.UFD�—.
� � I �,���`�� .
aGT�Elv �',�iK �c ����u���.��fF,,,�j- � fJ � r`
� ���,�����i�Y ���/'✓�' �r�ALy��s �; Z or Z
,��: i�/z/��
Ur��Yi��� ������ : Ex«���C ���t.�
��,i�t�7AG� �'k'�' � ��oJEC� ii�fl'�
��;�.�#�': pgR Tt�V �ff�fCllVC' �EG'[//�2ED• 'S� fa �� �ET�i��it�El'.J
�
Sf.41�t�.�2D�
�A a�nli: ��z r� ��€��n,��' ��'�ui�'�� ; l �r��j,��a : Z.
-- �sr�f�r�,�rr �x;,7�,-;M ; o �'�;���r�: o
�o�,�,fr'7�f�'� Nlf� �fEi� 5� �?j �iS 5 F
.;.� e� .
K i .?
���5 ��r�' ���{ts N//� ���Z� 5F 3��f 3S 5F
�Aw T�� ���P�-�v ��ca��a�n�r ��„�r��res SNA��. �� �/��F�Fp BY �`��
s�AFF �,���� ?'a rniac. �E�,��E,� R� rN�' ��C..
�E S�TE j'���' �`�ul��"t��rs /rv�t�rp� �'��5 oF ��/F �'Ui,cv�NG
���iG� �x?�ND �EYDNP �f�F ��iv����l-� �F Tt��' �Gr�-1�i �A�
��o cf��' 1�,���T Y,
� ��°�•.r. �v�2��,�
�
/0 •2 7� 9 2 �jd�-�.�+— �-e� �trw�-e. — 5��2���/ �.O..ue�
_ Q !�� � � — ��.uy�-� `� � /D
_ _- '�.. j,r�o�.,,"C �� .�.,r�
�%y��... ar�
�-���f� sx�� ,,� ���.z,,� �� �.. � � ���,�)
Co�N�:l , „ �� „
----__- _ - .__. _ w/.tn- o'GN2 !/ � 7
/ �
� �d� � .�.s-u-e — �,�%�P /�-y��
--- ' !4^^� �"o� U �
. �� �� ��� �� C� -c��� �-�
� �
�,.e.�,._ �� �.-� .
• �^� — a d-e�--'� �►-�.Z° .�P S oa'o �' �,�.:,..
--� i�e''� �-o� .
._. � �-- ozvt �- ,��o�P�,.-e,r-�' P-�j,6c� 7
%
�j s� � s,�. �.� _
. ��� � ���2 � ? -
. 2���.' � ,°.�'
� �,�:�, c��,
,
- -- - � „ �,� _ ----------
P
OL� �,+�.a�• :+"�^��
--�
_ _ - �.� ►� .�'� .� �. �:� = � e,,..� � �
--- �,�.� ?
� �- 7��..--- G�.-� �,� �� �- l�„- �o w 7
7 w�� �
-� � - �� �. �.�.-��„ .
� � � .. N�,� ��.�.� �n,-,c� � z-3 .�,�- ,��� ��c , _7
J � y �
i �
� � �REC'D OCT 7 ?99�'
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive 303 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657
October 7 , 1992
Mr. Mike ��;oli i ca
Assistar�t Director of Planning
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Coiorado 81657
Mike:
Attached is an updated property owners list (dated 10/7/92 ) that you
requested for resuming the approval process of the remodel to the
Golden Peak House at 278 Hanson Ranch Road. Also, as part of the
request, is a summary of zoning regulation modifications that are going
to have to be applied for as part of the redevelopment of the Golden
Peak House. They are as follows :
��/ —► 1 . A continuation of the exterior alterations to CCI from 5/24/91 and
9 %15/91 .
?. . Application for minor subdivision review.
3 . kequest for a change in distri.ct boundaries .
OK --i 4 . P.p�lication for Special Development District .
5 . Application for encroachment into established view corridors
(no. 1 ) .
I do not know in what order these are applied for, but all will be
required to achieve final approval . As we discussed, I was hoping that
with t.his information, the proper notification can be given to allow
for a work session/update to the PEC at their 10/26/92 meeting; and
witr appropriate information submitted, we might consider actual review
of t:Le proposal at the 11/9/92 and/or 11/23/92 PEC meeting.
If you have ar�y questions or need additional information on this
matt;Pr, please ,�ve me a call .
Sincer�:�y,
SNOWDOPv' AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
�
�
Crai N. Snowdon, AIA �-��Gc W .
Partner
Z�'¢/SZ 3 -3 90�
/
� ` � ' v � �
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE, VAIL COLORADO
AS OF 10/7/92
Block 1, Vail Village First Filing
Lot 1:
Linda J. Craddock
Box 2929
Colorado Springs, CO 80901-2929
Lot 2 :
Howard P. and Judith Berkowitz
888 7th Avenue
New York, NY 10106
Lot 3 :
Jerome & Martha Lewis - Unit A
410 17th Street
Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80202
Maurice 0. Rinehardt - Unit B
P.O. Box 5397
Lighthouse Point, FL 33074
Lot 7 :
W. Grant Williams
#2 Ladue Lane
St. Louis, MO 63124
Lot 13 :
Barbara M. Osborne
c/o Keith S. Jennings
1531 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Lot 4:
Jay A. Precourt
1560 Broadway
Suite 2000
Denver, CO 80202
Lot 19:
E .B. Chester K.H. Chester
395 Mill Creek Circle or P.O. Box 8243
Vail, CO 81657 Rocky Mount, NC 27804
. ' + + � � �
. � Page 2
A part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
(Christiania)
Kindelco, Inc.
c/o Christiania Lodge
356 E. Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, CO 81657
Part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
Edwin Whitehead
15 Valley Drive
Greenwich, CT 06830
Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
(Tivoli Lodge)
Robert and Diane Lazier
Box 627
Vail, CO 81658
A part of Lot A, Block 5C, Vail Village First Filing
(Hill Building)
Blanche C. Hill
311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Lot D1, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
(Town of Vail)
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Tract E and F:
Vail Associates, Inc .
Joe Macy
Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
Parcel C:
U. S. Forest Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, CO 81645
` •. ,j` • '« � �
� Page 3
Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village Fifth Filing
(Cyranos Building)
Margretta Parks
P.O. Box 37312
Denver, CO 80237
Lot H, Block 5A, Vail Village First Filing
(Red Lion Building)
Oscar Tang - Residential Units #1 & #2
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Charles Rosenquist - Retail
P.O. Box 686
Vail, CO 81657
Richard Brown - Retail
1780 South Bellaire
Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Jon Shirley - Residential Unit #3
2019 Evergreen Point
Medina, WA 98039
�.l�.- �Q�
� ^
� �s�,� T�
�..��'j�-�� Ca
�
�'/6��
. � � � �
.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
October 26, 1992
Present Staff Present
Diana Donovan Kristan Pritz
Jeff Bowen Mike Mollica
Dalton Williams Andy Knudtsen
Greg Amsden Shelly Mello
Chuck Crist Jim Curnutte
Gena Whitten
1. Starting at approximately 2:30 P.M., a review of a staff approval for two minor
amendments to SDD #4 - Cascade Village Area A, The Westin, 1300 Westhaven Drive
and the Cascade Club, 1294 Westhaven Drive was discussed prior to the originally
scheduled item No. 1 to accommodate those members of the public present for this
item.
Applicant: The Westin Resort/Cascade Club Ltd.
Planner: Shelly Mello
Shelly Mello reviewed briefly the two requests. The general consensus of the Board
was that they understood the requests per the staff memo and were ready to vote.
Dalton Williams motioned to approve the requests per the staff inemo, Jeff Bowen
seconded. The Planning and Environmental Commission voted unanimously 6-0 to
approve the two requests with the conditions per the staff's memo. Diana Donovan
commented that she would not be in favor of the conversion of more retail or
restaurant areas to office space in the future.
2. A work session was held to discuss a request for the establishment of a Special
Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change and
an amendment to View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson ranch
Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Association/Vail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Members from the public introduced themselves; Michael Staughton, Ron Riley,
Connie Knight, Craig Snowdon, Jim Johnson, Jim Lamont, and Jack Curtin.
Mike Mollica explained that this was an update work session only and that a regular
work session was scheduled for November 23, 1992.
..� '�..
• •
Craig Snowdon, the architect for the applicants, reviewed the proposed plans with the
Planning and Environmental Commission explaining that the application was for an
exterior alteration and an SDD as sought in May 1991, and again in November 1991.
He further explained that the request includes a rezoning and an encroachment into a
view corridor. Craig also explained that Cyrano's is not a part of the current proposal
and that now that the view corridor ordinance is in place, a view corridor encroachment
will be requested and additionally, that a land purchase is in process with Vail
Associates.
General discussion was held with concern of who was the owner of the northern-most
easement along Hanson Ranch Road. Mike Mollica stated that he would work with
Larry Eskwith to resolve this issue. Craig Snowdon pointed out that there are 6
concerns which are being addressed in the final proposal:
1. building height
2. density
3. site coverage
4. landscaping
5. parking
6. permitted use
Craig Snowdon also explained that the proposed plans modified the west boundary of
the building (cutting back the building to alleviate the impact of the view corridor) and
that it should be noted that Los Amigos deck may be expanded into Tract E, however,
the current application does not include this.
Jack Curtain suggested that the grade changes be addressed, especially concerning
the access to the mountain, because he was aware of drainage problems in the area.
Craig Snowdon assured Jack and the Board that this would be addressed.
Jeff Bowen stated that he was concerned with the height of the building (into the view
corridor) and that the proposed building has too much mass and bulk.
Chuck Crist was concerned with the bulk and mass as perceived from the street and
stated that he did not feel it would affect the view corridor. He would like the proposed
building footprint to be staked for the next site visit for the next scheduled review on
November 23, 1992.
Dalton Williams agreed with Chuck Crist's comments inasmuch that the building
footprint needs to be staked especially concerning the balconies. He also stated that
he is very concerned with the building height and that Section F of the CCI (Design
Guidelines) should be considered in the design of the proposed structure.
Gena Whitten was concerned with the height and suggested that it was necessary to
see the flat elevations of the different areas to better determine the mass of the
building.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 26, 1992
2
f `; � •
Jeff Bowen pointed out that the Master Plan should be reviewed and used as the basis
for this review.
Greg Amsden stated that he would also like the building "lined ouY' for a period of
approximately two weeks and to let the public visualize it as well. He also stated that
he would like to see the flat elevations of the building.
Diana Donovan was concerned with the re-zoning of Tract E. She also had concerns
with the mass of the building as proposed.
The general consensus by the Board was that there was concern with the height, mass
and bulk of the building and that the accurate staking of the building, for the site visit
November 23, will be necessary.
3. A request for setback and density variances to allow for an addition at 2963
Bellflower/Lot 7, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Hans and Mia Vlaar
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte reviewed the applicants request per the plans submitted and stated that
the applicant has an amendment to the landscaping and driveway area which
enhances the application.
Hans Vlaar presented his conceptual revision to the driveway area using more grass
and less paving or incorporating grass pavers (Grasscrete).
Dalton Williams suggested that the Grasscrete concept was acceptable to him and that
it was a good idea.
Chuck Crist agreed with the revised plan that the applicant presented.
Jeff Bowen agreed with the revised plan that the applicant presented.
Gena Whitten agreed with the revised plan that the applicant presented.
Dalton Williams agreed with the revised plan that the applicant presented.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 26, 1992
3
i,i
� � - � �
�o �2�� 92 ��� �,� �.-�-e
-- ��c �� �
� � t�,� - ��- �- �e �-. � ���� � �
01 �°`�`� ,�,` �'`�-e ?yo Io ? �� �4 ? W�-� �
_ _ 7{�� ,�.��2� �20� ��e�.,-:� � ?
�
. � `�°� ��s/ ��
_5.�-�-✓ �.�•-�✓� , e.�c . w-� a�-�C �� /�'�v.� , c,t.�
��L� � G� ��^� •
/y� , _
_ ' .✓ .L��G� — .te : 2� �� .r.,.�� /Zo�i�J — -�
7
R��� - �- �,�`�.� <�.�. �.� ,�-�
���"e G��( �[ `
cG�GC. 0-�l " y�e� p�G..v�y /�.� �M //t-y�--c/L L J.
� ✓
"��.�v��� ,ti- .� � �GO,.-�.e �� P.�C _
_ � - w ? ?�
�'�-�..-. . � -
, � ��� �� �-�. .� .�� ��� �-�`
0��
„ti%zd 11,� �-��� � l,
��. _ �(� � „��,�_ � �,
�. �-�:�k� �� i� L�/S -' �. a,� �ru,� a�� , o�-.- a--� -
�jl� G;e=L+-�A�:f�-o� G� �� . 2 l� �G�� ea��
l
de.,�-aua-.
'�.�%l:ki�� ,�Y�� �i .� l/� cav�•�.✓� �/��Ll�l�1 .
� •
v / oL���� �
�(d C��� ,�i� /yt,�i�- .l� � -
��-.,` -- ' � � � � A.�.�, � w� � j _-
— r, � 5,�.���° C..��
�" � ���
. .Y i 1� . .._ -
� �� � �
�
��-+�. � �l /�/r, ��C �
. �a�=� �Guc-�( dYfi� o` /��e%uo--r,Q -
� 2 ��w1 . _
- � a�wbv-�` ' GZr�%ct-�-t o���ir� �. �P o� S.c,e�G-�M� C.�-�-�� - %��-e
��^o't-u U
� ��� G��.�. -
�, �a'N'e+'� - ����Ga� N`-G?�n/ C'.rv�.4Q.C'Z i�9/�C.?i1 _
_ de,G ' /�'►'�- d� �����!/ •
C. � ,r.t� � ✓.e%K� I` �+`��. �� �—s1^ �� .G�L`�i.' - Vic-Q�L✓ C-e��u..�
�Q `�� �
�l iY��- 4� Co'►�Cn'� •
� 5�� �"�c � ����� . /l j i�'�� i� . _
U
�a��or t✓, - J'�e%� c��.�.. — ,r.�-e �� [1�G f � ���e�� _
,'• � �i o�'90 �v . . . ,>
- �j.,�►-o� W, ' ✓'���%� Gm-��t. -- W�-� �or/�- i?`�P ��lL.
���
- �� .� 7-�v ?
, �� ,
�� °'� _ � �oc� ,��/.,�.l�- ,.�,
' .�� �-�, �r-�.�e.-� �, ire,rC� b✓s , " /
�rrti•�•.• - .r.ca-e. -�P !''1a�� �.e��.� �� ��C%� ���i.�"�-w .
�. A�...�,., - S,t.� �Ce .G'-�, , mi, �� ��r.ow,.�( ,Z� .
° R¢�- � o
� - ��
�.��.,Y�- • C�-L.�,.,... ,,...� ��,�-.%� .�� � � ��,
� �`!�� '
� A�:� .r,-� C.r� a,,.oQ a�� ,�. � ��-P , �/o-w:�
�!%�� � � �.
� c�-�=� — � �� 7'd tJ ���. .o�:e-, �.,
�
T��� G ,
�o�-�. - 11�� �/ 7'.�� � ,_- � � / .� �
7`� i/' 1�-.� ✓ �� � ��,,�,/�
- ..G..t �--t� ,Ge � � � /����� _ _ -
i ��/�
. '�/
"(��n f.r.� .
t`' ' i�9'@•
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL
VAIL, COLORADO
A Proposal for
Addition, Renovation and Expansion
November 9, 1992
PREPARED FOR:
THE TOWN OF VAIL AND THE GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ASSOCIATION
PREPARED BY:
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
. • �
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to present information regarding a
re-development proposal for the Golden Peak House located upon
Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing. These parcels
of land are located in the heart of Vail Village at the base of
the Vail Ski Area and the intersection of Bridge Street and
Hanson Ranch Road.
This report addresses the various requirements of the Town of
Vail Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations and is divided into
the following three sections :
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This section of the report describes the development proposal and
the existing conditions upon the site. Proposed development
statistics and standards are presented in this section as well as
impacts of the proposal . Zoning considerations are also
discussed.
DESIGN REGULATIONS
This section of the report describes the design intent of the
proposal and addresses compliance of the proposal with the Vail
Village Urban Design Considerations .
SZJNII�ARY
This section is a brief summary of the key points of the
proposal .
' • �
' Page 2
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Golden Peak House was constructed in 1966 and currently
consists of retail shops, bars and restaurants, a barber shop,
and 18 dwelling units (condominiums) . Virtually no major upgrade
or renovation of the structure has been completed since the
building' s initial construction and the building is physically in
need of major renovation.
Coupled with the Association' s need to renovate and upgrade the
building physically is the overall Community need to upgrade the
building design in order to fit into what has become a certain
design "vocabulary" in Vail Village. The Golden Peak House is
architecturally very different from all other buildings within
Vail Village and was constructed with a roof form which is no
longer, and may never have been, appropriate for the prominent
site at the top of Bridge Street. A major aspect of this
development proposal is to renovate the structure in a manner
which results in a recognition of the distinctive design
character of Vail Village. These design aspects of the proposal
are discussed in the next section, Design Considerations, of this
report.
The redevelopment proposal for the structure consists of a total
renovation of the existing building which includes the major
modification of the roof to gable roof forms, the addition of
dormers, balconies, bay windows, arcades, and other architectural
projections resulting in a totally different appearance of the
building. In addition, the dining deck on the south side of the
building is proposed to be enlarged ( see Site Plan) . The
existing elevations of the building and proposed elevations are
shown.
The addition of the flat roofs and 3/12 pitch gable roof results
in the infill of the "valley" portions of the existing
"butterfly" roof structure. Consequently, this results in the
ability to construct a majority of the development within the
established envelope of the building.
As well as exterior changes to the structure, interior changes
are proposed which will result in more efficient use of space,
better circulation throughout the building, improved access, and,
most importantly of all, the ability to utilize the residential
units much better as guest accommodations with the addition of a
functional "hotel" lobby on the second floor level .
. . �
Page 3
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
A. DLVELOPMENT STATISTICS
The following table indicates, numerically, the existing and
proposed floor areas for the Golden Peak House.
1992 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
BASEMENT FLOOR
"The Slope" 1, 530 620 2 , 150
Ski Shop 650 495 1, 145
Storage 1, 340 <595> 745
"Los Amigos" 0 1, 170 1 , 170
Common 795 595 1 , 390
4, 315 2 , 285 6, 600
GROUND FLOOR
Restaurant 0 60 60
Barber Shop 154 < 154> 0
Commercial/Retail 3, 812 2, 219 6, 031
Common 1 , 567 < 839> 728*
5, 533 1 , 286 6 , 819
SECOND FLOOR
Restaurant 1, 286 939 2 , 225
Dwelling Units
( 8 existing/5 proposed) 2 , 499 < 34> 2 , 465
Common 1 , 570 40 1 , 610*
5 , 355 945 6 , 300
THIRD FLOOR
Dwelling Units
( 8 existing/8 proposed) 3, 760 1, 203 4 , 963
Accommodation Units
( 0 existing/2 proposed) 0 650 650
Common 1 , 570 < 750> 820*
5 , 330 1, 103 6 , 433
* Less 50 sq. ft. /floor for elevator
' � . �
Page 4
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
1992 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
FOURTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
(2 existing/4 proposed
w/4 lock-outs) 2, 681 3, 108 5, 789
Accommodation Units
(0 existing/0 proposed) 0 0 0
Common 125 416 541*
2 , 806 3, 524 6, 330
FIFTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
(0 existing/1 proposed) 0 2, 935 2 , 935
Common 0 192 192*
0 3 , 127 3 , 127
GRAND TOTALS: 23 , 339 12, 275 35, 609
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------
TOTALS BY USE:
Dwelling Units 8 , 940 7 , 217 16 , 152
Accommodation Units 0 650 650
Common 5, 627 < 346> 5 , 281
Retail 6, 146 3, 180 9 , 326
Restaurant 1, 286 2 , 169 3 , 455
Storage 1, 340 < 595> 745
* Less 50 sq. ft. /floor for elevator
. • �
Page 5
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
8. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The Golden Peak House is currently located within the Commercial
Core One Zone District. The combined site area of the two
existing lots which it occupies is 6, 915 square feet. The Golden
Peak House is currently located adjacent to the Agricultural and
Open Space Zone District which is indicated upon the Town of
Vail' s proposed Village Master Plan and Land Use Plan as Ski
Base/Recreation District.
In order to provide for the re-development of the Golden Peak
House it is proposed that this area be re-zoned to a Special
Development District ( SDD) . As stated in the Vail Zoning Code,
"the purpose of Special Development Districts is to encourage
flexibility in the development of land in order to promote its
most appropriate use, and to improve the design, character and
quality of new development" . It is believed that through a
Special Development District, this parcel of land can be
developed to meet both the objectives of the property owners and
the overall Community and result in a high quality development
which will be an asset to the Town of Vail .
The base "underlying" zone district for the SDD will be CC1
(Commercial Core One) since the uses proposed correspond to this
zone district.
As in any Special Development District, the development
standards, including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height,
density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking are as
indicated upon the Development Plans and are determined by the
Planning and Environmental Commission and approved by the Town
Council .
The Development Standards for the proposed SDD are as follows :
Lot Area•
The total size of the SDD will be 8, 219 square feet. This shall
include the existing overhang easements no. 1, 2 and 3 ( 1 , 307 sq.
ft. ) as indicated upon the Site Plan and Lots A and B, Block 2 ,
Vail Village First Filing ( 6, 912 sq. ft. ) .
Site Dimensions:
The site dimensions will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Setbacks•
Setbacks will be as indicated upon the Site Plan. Building
setbacks varying from less than 1 foot on the north and west and
1 foot on the east property boundaries .
. � • �
' Page 6
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
Height:
Building height will be as indicated upon the building elevations
which is 49 feet at the highest point of the gable roof located
in the eastern portion of the Development; and 40 feet at the
highest point in the western portion of the Development.
Density•
Density will be as indicated on the Development Plans .
Site Coveraqe:
Site coverage will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Landscapinq:
Landscaping will be as shown on the Landscape Plan and as finally
approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board.
Parkinq•
Parking will be calculated in accordance with the Town of Vail
Zoning Code and additional spaces required will be provided for
by contribution to the Town Parking Fund.
Permitted Use•
Permitted uses, condit�onal uses, and accessory uses will be
those specified with the CC1 Zone District.
Other applicable zoning issues relating to CC1 are addressed in
this proposal .
. • •
� Page 7
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
C. IMPACTS
The Town of Vail Department of Community Development has
requested that the potential changes or impacts resulting from
the proposal be evaluated according to the following identified
conditions .
Hvdroloqic Conditions:
The only hydrologic condition which will change as a result
of the proposal is an improvement of the various surface
drainage conditions both around the perimeter of the site
and upon the building itself . Roof drainage will be
substantially upgraded with the building renovation as well
as the installation of a new surface drainage system around
the building which will be designed to improve existing
drainage problems .
Atmospheric Conditions:
The renovation of the building will result in the addition
of gas fireplaces which will meet Town of Vail standards and
five existing wood burning fireplaces will be reused in the
proposal .
Geologic Conditions:
There will be no impact upon land forms, slopes, soils, or
potential hazards resulting from the proposal .
Noise and Odor:
There will be no significant impact upon these environmental
conditions . A potential exists that the upgrade of
restaurant kitchen facilities ( such as exhaust fans ) could
reduce any current odors which might exist from these
facilities . Any noise which might emanate from the outdoor
dining area will conform to Town of Vail standards regarding
noise levels .
Visual Conditions:
Visual changes resulting from this proposal are discussed
within the next section, Design Considerations, of this
report.
Land Use Conditions:
The proposal will clear up an existing conflict in land use;
by eliminating residential use overhanging agricultural/open
space and bring the property into compatibility with
officially approved land use and open space policies and
objectives . The land uses proposed are entirely consistent
with adopted and proposed land use plans .
' * • �
' Page 8
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9 , 1992
Circulation and Transportation Conditions:
In terms of pedestrian circulation the proposal results in a
very positive impact due to the upgrade of the major access
to Vail Mountain which exists between the Golden Peak House
and the Hill Building. Drainage, grades, and surface
condition improvements all will enhance the pedestrian flow
through this area. Delivery conditions will be improved by
the removal of the existing trash dumpsters in the skier
access way.
. I , • �
� Page 9
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
III. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
As mentioned in the previous section of the report, a certain
distinctive design character has evolved within Vail Village
which, through the implementation of the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan, is encouraged to be followed in the
redevelopment of existing structures . The following responds to
the stated Design Considerations and describes how the proposal
will be consistent with the established character of Vail Village
and Bridge Street and how the proposal will make positive
contributions to the quality of life.
Desiqn Statement:
The Golden Peak House Building is one of the most prominent
buildings in Vail Village. It is located at the "top" of Bridge
Street and serves as visual focus for pedestrians moving up
Bridge Street. The building is a contemporary mid-60 ' s design
with an inverted roofline that is out of context with its
surrounding neighbors and the village environment. The roofline
and the north facade make the building read as a sheer vertical
wall cutting off the street from Vail Mountain. The building has
fallen into disrepair and features cracked and peeling stucco,
plywood balconies in need of repair or replacement, and other
general areas of decline. It is a prime candidate for a major
redesign.
In redesigning the Golden Peak House it is important to address
the building' s verticality and somewhat imposing vertical scale.
Also, the building' s cold and hard relationship with Bridge
Street, i. e. its "meeting with grade" . This relationship with
grade is equally important on the mountain side and west traffic
corridor.
The building is in great need of a renewed identity that meshes
with the architecture of Vail Village. A gable roof is the most
reasonable approach to blending the building into the Village.
The upper floors on the Hanson Ranch Road side have been set back
for the enhancement of street enclosure and sun/shade
considerations .
By creating a covered arcade-like north facade at grade with a
transparent horizontal facade, the building will both meet the
street in a more human scale and provide a horizontal base. The
extension also breaks the overpowering verticalness of the
present arrangement. It is logical that this horizontal base of
windows turn the corner and continue along the west elevation,
creating interest and interaction at a human scale between the
building and the ski traffic moving through to the mountain. �
Development of this "throat" or narrow passage will need special
treatment and coordination between all adjoining property owners
and comply with the new guidelines established by the latest Town
of Vail streetscape plan.
. � • �
� Page 10
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
Verticality is less of an issue at the south elevation because
grade is one level higher. The roofline on the south is
therefore more capable of taking large openings (windows ) and
horizontal influence is less needed or required. The south
elevation should present a pleasant and exciting character in
equal response to the activity and excitement of the Vista Bahn.
The building offers great and exciting potential for a very
successful and pleasing re-design. It can be re-designed to meet
the needs of the owners and to achieve congruence with the
architectural context of Vail Village.
Pedestrianization:
Pedestrianization of upper Bridge Street and of the Vista Bahn
access alley will be improved with the proposal . The building' s
varying front facade at grade, and the covered arcade-like canopy
will draw people to the building. The skier access alleyway will
be cleaned up with the removal of trash dumpsters, improved
drainage, and upgraded ground surface materials . This area is a
viable public art site as it will become a mini-plaza inviting
the pedestrian to enter, experience, and move through.
Streetscape Framework:
The streetscape framework will be greatly improved with the
addition of bay windows, and the arcade-like roof canopy. These
architectural features will be more in keeping with the Urban
Design Guide Plan and other existing buildings in the Village.
The bay windows will be covered with a soffit varying from 3 feet
to 6 feet of overhang. The overhang soffit will give a protected
intimate environment for the window viewer. The changing
overhang condition (varying depth) will create an interesting
space to experience as opposed to one consistent window and
overhang relationship for the 110 linear feet of store front.
The Streetscape Framework will have the added interest of the
large gabled roof at the entry to the Golden Peak House Lodge
(main entry) and secondary roofs ( 2 ) at the entries to major
building tenants . Similar entry canopies have been utilized on
the remodeled Plaza Building with successful results . In
addition, canopy awnings will be located over entries to minor
shops .
Street Enclosure:
The street enclosure will be enhanced by the more human scaled
bay windows, and entry canopies . The enclosure will feel
somewhat lessened by the proposed stepping back of upper floors .
The sheer vertical north facade will feel much less vertical .
Also the gabled roof form will give a more varied, interesting
upper enclosure than the present long horizontal line of the roof
of the existing east mass . The enclosures stepping back will
mitigate the sheer verticality of the buildings north facade.
. � • �
Page 11
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
The skier access alley will become a semi-enclosed mini plaza
with potential placement for benches, landscaping or public art
locations as developed by the latest Town of Vail Streetscape
Plan.
Street Edqe:
Street edge will be greatly enhanced. Snowmelted brick pavers
will meet the building edge at grade and the in and out offsets
of the protected bay windows, and building entry ways will add
much needed interest. The elimination of the service stair from
grade down to the basement at the northeast corner of the
building will greatly increase the linear footage of street edge
with bay windows adding transparency. Small planters on grade
and planter boxes will add color and charm to the street edge.
The skier access plaza can be a feature "pocket" area and
surfaces will be greatly improved and benches and landscaping can
be added to tie into the latest Town of Vail Streetscape Plan.
Building Height/Views and Focal Points:
The proposed gable roof additions will only be 4 feet and 5 feet
higher (at the Ridge Line) than the highest points of the
existing roofs on the east and west building masses . The gable
roofs pitch down at a 3/12 pitch to points along the current roof
height. The west mass infills the existing open end of the
butterfly roof form. The western-most sidewall height is
unchanged.
The focal point of the Riva Ridge Ski Run is maintained from most
Bridge Street view points, and further analysis will demonstrate
that the mountain view will be enhanced by the reduction of flat
building mass . The 3/12 gable roof form, as recommended by the
Design Considerations is more in keeping with the architectural
fabric of Vail Village and will be a major improvement to upper
Bridge Street. The new roof form has been designed and placed
over the existing building masses as carefully and considerately
as possible. It is felt that the minimal increases are far
outweighed by the advantages gained.
Views from the new Vail Parking Garage and through the skier
accessway demonstrate minimal encroachments into established view
corridors . These encroachments are of minimal impact.
• ,` ' + � �
Page 12
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
Sun/Shade:
The proposed building design will minimally impact the sun/shade
relationship on Seibert Circle and upper Bridge Street. By
stepping the upper floors back the sun angle (50°) hits less of
the building at the points of critical shadow impact. These
studies will be further analyzed as the planning process
proceeds .
Service and Deliverv:
Deliveries as well as trash pick-up will be at the northeast
corner of the building. The existing dumpsters located in the
Vista Bahn access alley will be eliminated. A trash compaction
unit will be installed in the basement and the trash dumpsters
will be lifted to the main level with a new service elevator.
The elevator will replace the exterior service stairway at
approximately the same location. Removal of the trash dumpsters
from the alley will greatly improve the high traffic, busy
pedestrian area.
Sub Area Concepts:
Two Sub-Area Concepts are indicated within the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan which relate to the development proposal . The
first of these concepts is #3 . 2 which discusses a renovation to
improve the pedestrian scale at the base of the building and to
provide for greater transparency as an activity generator on
Seibert Circle. The Vail Town Council has previously determined
that this design concept should not be accomplished by means of
the ten foot encroachment onto public right-of-way as encouraged
by the original Guideplan. The Council indicated that they would
prefer to attempt to achieve these goals through a combination of
bay windows, overlays, and other architectural projections on the
facade of the building. In response to this direction the
current proposal has improved the pedestrian scale utilizing
these features and providing increased transparency while not
encroaching at ground level on to Town property.
. � � �
. Page 13
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9 , 1992
Sub-area concept #3 . 3 indicates improvements to Seibert Circle as
well as an area for "mountain gateway improvements" including
landscaping and a minor plaza. As mentioned previously the
proposal includes these features within the identified area and
the result will be a greatly improved "gateway" to Vail Mountain
and tie into the Town of Vail latest streetscape plan.
• . t ,� � �
Page 14
Golden Peak House Remodel
November 9, 1992
IV. SiJMMARY
The proposal results in the accomplishment of the following major
goals :
1 ) The redevelopment of one of Vail ' s most prominent
locations in a manner which is consistent with the Vail
Village Urban Design Guideplan;
2 ) A substantial improvement of site and landscape
conditions in an area which is the major portal to Vail
Mountain.
It is clear when reviewing the developmental proposal that this
is truly a project in which everyone benefits . The Golden Peak
House Association benefits from the major upgrade and renovation
of the building in terms of bringing the building into
conformation with current building codes and life safety
requirements, the overall community benefits in terms of the
major upgrade and enhancement of an area which is currently an
eyesore, and, most importantly, the Vail visitor benefits by the
improvement of the Vail Village experience which will be improved
both aesthetically and functionally leaving a lasting impression
of a high quality experience.
, , �� "'� ��� �
�
r
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL
� VAIL, COLORADO
A Proposal for
Addition, Renovation and Expansion
October 12, 1992
PREPARED FOR:
THE TOWN OF VAIL AND THE GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ASSOCIATION
PREPARED BY:
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
201 Gare Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
, � ,
�
.
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to present information regarding a
re-development proposal for the Golden Peak House located upon
Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing. These parcels
of land are located in the heart of Vail Village at the base of
the Vail Ski Area and the intersection of Bridge Street and
Hanson Ranch Road.
This report addresses the various requirements of the Town of
Vail Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations and is divided into
the following three sections :
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This section of the report describes the development proposal and
the existing conditions upon the site. Proposed development
statistics and standards are presented in this section as well as
impacts of the proposal. Zoning considerations are also
discussed.
DESIGN REGULATIONS
This section of the report describes the design intent of the
proposal and addresses compliance of the proposal with the Vail
Village Urban Design Considerations .
SiJNII�SARY
This section is a brief summary of the key points of the
proposal.
1 � � �
�
- Page 2
ti
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Golden �eak House was constructed in 1966 and currently
consist� �f retail shops, bars and restaurants, a barber shop,
and IS dwelling units (condominiums) . Virtually no major upgrade
or renovation of the structure has been completed since the
building's initial construction and the building is physically in
need of major renovation.
Coupled with the Association' s need to renovate and upgrade the
building physically is the overall Community need to upgrade the
building design in order to fit into what has become a certain
design "vocabulary" in Vail Village. The Golden Peak House is
architecturally very different from all other buildings within
Vail Village and was constructed with a roof form which is no
longer, and may never have been, appropriate for the prominent
site at the top of Bridge Street. A major aspect of this
development proposal is to renovate the structure in a manner
which results in a recognition of the distinctive design
character of Vail Village. These design aspects of the proposal
are discussed in the next section, Design Considerations, of this
report.
The redevelopment proposal for the structure consists of a total
renovation of the existing building which includes the major
modification of the roof to gable roof forms, the addition of
dormers, balconies, bay windows, arcades, and other architectural
projections resulting in a totally different appearance of the
building. In addition, the dining deck on the south side of the
building is proposed to be enlarged to accommodate additional
seating ( see Site Plan) . The existing elevations of the building
and proposed elevations are shown.
The addition of the flat roofs and 3/12 pitch gable roof results
in the infill of the "valley" portions of the existing
"butterfly" roof structure. Consequently, this results in the
ability to construct a majority of the development within the
established envelope of the building.
As well as exterior changes to the structure, interior changes
are proposed which will result in more efficient use of space,
better circulation throughout the building, improved access, and,
most importantly of all, the ability to utilize the residential
units much better as guest accommodations with the addition of a
functional "hotel" lobby on the second floor level .
, , � �
�
- Page 3
�
Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
A. DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
The following table indicates, numerically, the existing and
proposed floor areas for the Golden Peak House.
1992 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
BASEMENT FLOOR
"The Slope" 1, 530 620 2, 150
Ski Shop 650 495 1, 145
Storage 1 , 340 <595> 745
"Los Amigos" 0 1, 170 1, 170
Common 795 595 1 , 390
4, 315 2 , 285 6, 600
GROUND FLOOR
Restaurant 0 60 60
Barber Shop 154 < 154> 0
Commercial/Retail 3, 812 2, 219 6, 031
Common 1 , 567 < 839> 728*
5, 533 1, 286 6, 819
SECOND FLOOR
Restaurant 1, 286 939 2, 225
Dwelling Units
( 8 existing/3 proposed) 2 , 499 < 64> 2, 435
Common 1 , 570 40 1 , 610*
5 , 355 915 6, 270
THIRD FLOOR
Dwelling Units
( � existing/7 proposed) 3, 760 1, 203 4, 963
Accommodation Units
( 0 existing/2 proposed) 0 650 650
Common 1 , 570 < 750> 820*
5, 330 1, 103 6 , 433
* Less 50 sq. ft. /floor for elevator
� � �
- Page 4
ti
Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12 , 1992
1992 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
FOURTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
(2 existing/4 proposed
w/4 lock-outs ) 2 , 681 3, 108 5 , 789
Accommodation Units
(0 existing/o proposed) 0 0 0
Common 125 416 541*
2, 806 3, 524 6, 330
FIFTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
( 0 existing/1 proposed) 0 2 , 935 2 , 935
Common 0 19 2 19 2*
0 3, 127 3 , 127
GR.AND TOTALS: 23, 339 12, 240 35 , 579
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------
TOTALS BY USE:
Dwelling Units 8, 940 7 , 182 16 , 122
Accommodation Units 0 650 650
Common 5, 627 < 346> 5 , 281
Retail 6, 146 3, 180 9 , 326
Restaurant 1 , 286 2 , 169 3 , 455
Storage 1 , 340 < 595> 745
* Less 50 sq. ft. /floor for elevator
, ` , � �
- Page 5
,
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12 , 1992
B. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The Golden Peak House is currently located within the Commercial
Core One Zone District. The combined site area of the two
existing lots which it occupies is 6, 915 square feet. The Golden
Peak House is currently located adjacent to the Agricultural and
Open Space Zone District which is indicated upon the Town of
Vail' s proposed Village Master Plan and Land Use Plan as Ski
Base/Recreation District.
In order to provide for the re-development of the Golden Peak
House it is proposed that this area be re-zoned to a Special
Development District (SDD) . As stated in the Vail Zoning Code,
"the purpose of Special Development Districts is to encourage
flexibility in the development of land in order to promote its
most appropriate use, and to improve the design, character and
quality of new development" . It is believed that through a
Special Development District, this parcel of land can be
developed to meet both the objectives of the property owners and
the overall Community and result in a high quality development
which will be an asset to the Town of Vail .
The base "underlying" zone district for the SDD will be CC1
(Commercial Core One) since the uses proposed correspond to this
zone district.
As in any Special Development District, the development
standards, including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks , height,
density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking are as
indicated upon the Development Plans and are determined by the
Planning and Environmental Commission and approved by the Town
Council .
The Development Standards for the proposed SDD are as follows :
Lot Area:
The total size of the SDD will be 8, 556 square feet. This shall
include the existing overhang easements no. 1 and 2 ( 1 , 205 sq.
ft. ) as indicated upon the Site Plan and Lots A and B, Block 2 ,
Vail Village First Filing ( 6, 912 sq. ft . ) and a part of Lot C
(439 sq. ft. ) as shown on the site plan.
Site Dimensions:
The site dimensions will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Setbacks•
Setbacks will be as indicated upon the Site Plan. Building
setbacks varying from less than 1 foot on the north and west and
1 foot on the east property boundaries .
� . � ! �
- Page 6
.
Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
Height:
Building height will be as indicated upon the building elevations
which is 51 feet at the highest point of the gable roof located
in the eastern portion of the Development; and 40 feet at the
highest point in the western portion of the Development.
Density:
Density will be as indicated on the Development Plans .
Site Coveraqe•
Site coverage will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Landscapinq:
Landscaping will be as shown on the Landscape Plan and as finally
approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board.
Parkincr•
Parking will be calculated in accordance with the Town of Vail
Zoning Code and additional spaces required will be provided for
by contribution to the Town Parking Fund.
Permitted Use•
Permitted uses, conditional uses, and accessory uses will be
those specified with the CC1 Zone District.
Other applicable zoning issues relating to CC1 are addressed in
this proposal .
� , � � �
- Page 7
Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12 , 1992
C. IMPACTS
The Town of Vail Department of Community Development has
requested that the potential changes or impacts resulting from
the proposal be evaluated according to the following identified
conditions .
Hydrologic Conditions:
The only hydrologic condition which will change as a result
of the proposal is an improvement of the various surface
drainage conditions both around the perimeter of the site
and upon the building itself . Roof drainage will be
substantially upgraded with the building renovation as well
as the installation of a new surface drainage system around
the building which will be designed to improve existing
drainage problems .
Atmospheric Conditions:
The renovation of the building will result in the addition
of gas fireplaces which will meet Town of Vail standards and
five existing wood burning fireplaces will be reused in the
proposal .
Geologic Conditions:
There will be no impact upon land forms, slopes, soils, or
potential hazards resulting from the proposal .
Noise and Odor•
There will be no significant impact upon these environmental
conditions . A potential exists that the upgrade of
restaurant kitchen facilities ( such as exhaust fans ) could
reduce any current odors which might exist from these
facilities . Any noise which might emanate from the outdoor
dining area will conform to Town of Vail standards regarding
noise levels .
Visual Conditions:
Visual changes resulting from this proposal are discussed
within the next section, Design Considerations , of this
report.
Land Use Conditions:
The proposal will clear up an existing conflict in land use;
by eliminating residential use overhanging agricultural/open
space and bring the property into compatibility with
officially approved land use and open space policies and
objectives . The land uses proposed are entirely consistent
with adopted and proposed land use plans .
. � �
. Page 8
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
Circulation and Transportation Conditions:
In terms of pedestrian circulation the proposal results in a
very positive impact due to the upgrade of the major access
to Vail Mountain which exists between the Golden Peak House
and the Hill Building. Drainage, grades, and surface
condition improvements all will enhance the pedestrian flow
through this area. Delivery conditions will be improved by
the removal of the existing trash dumpsters in the skier
access way.
. �r �
- Page 9
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
III. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
As mentioned in the previous section of the report, a certain
distinctive design character has evolved within Vail Village
which, through the implementation of the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan, is encouraged to be followed in the
redevelopment of existing structures . The following responds to
the stated Design Considerations and describes how the proposal
will be consistent with the established character of Vail Village
and Bridge Street and how the proposal will make positive
contributions to the quality of life.
Design Statement:
The Golden Peak House Building is one of the most prominent
buildings in Vail Village. It is located at the "top" of Bridge
Street and serves as visual focus for pedestrians moving up
Bridge Street. The building is a contemporary mid-60 ' s design
with an inverted roofline that is out of context with its
surrounding neighbors and the village environment. The roofline
and the north facade make the building read as a sheer vertical
wall cutting off the street from Vail Mountain. The building has
fallen into disrepair and features cracked and peeling stucco,
plywood balconies in need of repair or replacement, and other
general areas of decline. It is a prime candidate for a major
redesign.
In redesigning the Golden Peak House it is important to address
the building' s verticality and somewhat imposing vertical scale.
Also, the building' s cold and hard relationship with Bridge
Street, i. e. its "meeting with grade" . This relationship with
grade is equally important on the mountain side and west traffic
corridor.
The building is in great need of a renewed identity that meshes
with the architecture of Vail Village. A gable roof is the most
reasonable approach to blending the building into the Village.
The upper floors on the Hanson Ranch Road side have been set back
for the enhancement of street enclosure and sun/shade
considerations .
By creating a covered arcade-like north facade at grade with a
transparent horizontal facade, the building will both meet the
street in a more human scale and provide a horizontal base. The
extension also breaks the overpowering verticalness of the
present arrangement. It is logical that this horizontal base of
windows turn the corner and continue along the west elevation,
creating interest and interaction at a human scale between the
building and the ski traffic moving through to the mountain.
Development of this "throat" or narrow passage will need special
treatment and coordination between all adjoining property owners
and comply with the new guidelines established by the latest Town
of Vail streetscape plan.
. , � �
- Page 10
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
Verticality is less of an issue at the south elevation because
grade is one level higher. The roofline on the south is
therefore more capable of taking large openings (windows ) and
horizontal influence is less needed or required. The south
elevation should present a pleasant and exciting character in
equal response to the activity and excitement of the Vista Bahn.
The building offers great and exciting potential for a very
successful and pleasing re-design. It can be re-designed to meet
the needs of the owners and to achieve congruence with the
architectural context of Vail Village.
Pedestrianization:
Pedestrianization of upper Bridge Street and of the Vista Bahn
access alley will be improved with the proposal . The building' s
varying front facade at grade, and the covered arcade-like canopy
will draw people to the building. The skier access alleyway will
be cleaned up with the removal of trash dumpsters, improved
drainage, and upgraded ground surface materials . This area is a
viable public art site as it will become a mini-plaza inviting
the pedestrian to enter, experience, and move through.
Streetscape Framework:
The streetscape framework will be greatly improved with the
addition of bay windows, and the arcade-like roof canopy. These
architectural features will be more in keeping with the Urban
Design Guide Plan and other existing buildings in the Village.
The bay windows will be covered with a soffit varying from 3 feet
to 6 feet of overhang. The overhang soffit will give a protected
intimate environment for the window viewer. The changing
overhang condition (varying depth) will create an interesting
space to experience as opposed to one consistent window and
overhang relationship for the 110 linear feet of store front.
The Streetscape Framework will have the added interest of the
large gabled roof at the entry to the Golden Peak House Lodge
(main entry) and secondary roofs ( 2 ) at the entries to major
building tenants . Similar entry canopies have been utilized on
the remodeled Plaza Building with successful results . In
addition, canopy awnings will be located over entries to minor
shops .
Street Enclosure:
The street enclosure will be enhanced by the more human scaled
bay windows, and entry canopies . The enclosure will feel
somewhat lessened by the proposed stepping back of upper floors .
The sheer vertical north facade will feel much less vertical .
Also the gabled roof form will give a more varied, interesting
upper enclosure than the present long horizontal line of the roof
of the existing east mass . The enclosures stepping back will
mitigate the sheer verticality of the buildings north facade.
. � �
• Page 11
- Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12 , 1992
The skier access alley will become a semi-enclosed mini plaza
with potential placement for benches , landscaping or public art
locations as developed by the latest Town of Vail Streetscape
Plan.
Street Edcre:
Street edge will be greatly enhanced. Snowmelted brick pavers
will meet the building edge at grade and the in and out offsets
of the protected bay windows, and building entry ways will add
much needed interest. The elimination of the service stair from
grade down to the basement at the northeast corner of the
building will greatly increase the linear footage of street edge
with bay windows adding transparency. Small planters on grade
and planter boxes will add color and charm to the street edge.
The skier access plaza can be a feature "pocket" area and
surfaces will be greatly improved and benches and landscaping can
be added to tie into the latest Town of Vail Streetscape Plan.
Building Height/Views arid Focal Points:
The proposed gable roof additions will only be 4 feet and 6 feet
higher (at the Ridge Line) than the highest points of the
existing roofs on the east and west building masses . The gable
roofs pitch down at a 3/12 pitch to points along the current roof
height. The west mass infills the existing open end of the
butterfly roof form. The western-most sidewall height is
unchanged.
The focal point of the Riva Ridge Ski Run is maintained from most
Bridge Street view points, and further analysis will demonstrate
that the mountain view will be enhanced by the reduction of flat
building mass . The 3/12 gable roof form, as recommended by the
Design Considerations is more in keeping with the architectural
fabric of Vail Village and will be a major improvement to upper
Bridge Street. The new roof form has been designed and placed
over the existing building masses as carefully and considerately
as possible. It is felt that the minimal increases are far
outweighed by the advantages gained.
Views from the new Vail Parking Garage and through the skier
accessway demonstrate minimal encroachments into established view
corridors . These encroachments are of minimal impact.
� ' � �,
� Page 12
' Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
Sun/Shade•
The proposed building design will minimally impact the sun/shade
relationship on Seibert Circle and upper Bridge Street. By
stepping the upper floors back the sun angle (50°) hits less of
the building at the points of critical shadow impact. These
studies will be further analyzed as the planning process
proceeds .
Service and Deliverv:
Deliveries as well as trash pick-up will be at the northeast
corner of the building. The existing dumpsters located in the
Vista Bahn access alley will be eliminated. A trash compaction
unit will be installed in the basement and the trash dumpsters
will be lifted to the main level with a new service elevator.
The elevator will replace the exterior service stairway at
approximately the same location. Removal of the trash dumpsters
from the alley will greatly improve the high traffic, busy
pedestrian area.
Sub Area Concepts:
Two Sub-Area Concepts are indicated within the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan which relate to the development proposal . The
first of these concepts is #9 which discusses a commercial ground
floor expansion in order to improve the pedestrian scale at the
base of the building and to provide for greater transparency as
an activity generator on Seibert Circle. The Vail Town Council
has previously determined that this design concept should not be
accomplished by means of the ten foot encroachment onto public
right-of-way as encouraged by the Guideplan. The Council
indicated that they would prefer to attempt to achieve these
goals through a combination of bay windows, overlays , and other
architectural projections on the facade of the building. In
response to this direction the current proposal has improved the
pedestrian scale utilizing these features and providing increased
transparency while not encroaching at ground level on to Town
property.
� � �
• • Page 13
' Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12, 1992
Sub-area concept #l0A indicates an area for "mountain gateway
improvements" including landscaping and a minor plaza. As
mentioned previously the proposal includes these features within
the identified area and the result will be a greatly improved
"gateway" to Vail Mountain and tie into the Town of Vail latest
streetscape plan.
� � �
- . Pag° 14
.�
' Golden Peak House Remodel
October 12 , 1992
IV. SUMMARY
The proposal results in the accomplishment of the following major
goals :
1 ) The redevelopment of one of Vail ' s most prominent
locations in a manner which is consistent with the Vail
Village Urban Design Guideplan;
2 ) A substantial improvement of site and landscape
conditions in an area which is the major portal to Vail
Mountain.
It is clear when reviewing the developmental proposal that this
is truly a project in which everyone benefits . The Golden Peak
House Association benefits from the major upgrade and renovation
of the building in terms of bringing the building into
conformation with current building codes and life safety
requirements, the overall community benefits in terms of the
major upgrade and enhancement of an area which is currently an
eyesore, and, most importantly, the Vail visitor benefits by the
improvement of the Vail Village experience which will be improved
both aesthetically and functionally leaving a lasting impression
of a high quality experience.
• � � `aaeac ��T:�idh� �'
:�n�i� ,.o
„ i �•.,�� "' ;��d�W3a 3Sf10H �tl3a N3a'183, toz� .a.,�� ' ;
- �
,
�
, �
� z
o � �
i
� �`�_l•I� , � _��
��J, c
\ � � d �5
/ �
�r I~ t�
� W �S
�� � � t i � s �� ��3�
� '',� � \\\ \\ �\ �g
�� ` �` y-� ��
� ,� ,� rt
z -�,, \�(,�\ iC -
Q /
o� � � _ �\ ���♦ \ \�� _,
� . � � ��. �� k'� \ —�`
�. � � � � � \ . �
_ � \ �. `l
�,
. � � �`_,';.. :_..:_ �\ �\ f
/ 33 �- _ \ \ 1
' \ 1� _ _;";,r.„.`:_ � `
�\\ � '-.�n_ � � \\ . \ r
r ��.
f
\\��\�� �= i ���\�� \��_.�e-
z� � � � °� \ �
�� ��jj'' p ' _
�Z � 3 `� i _ 1 � l . J.l LLII _
� �
I
= Il I
�ls \� � � i I ..: ' -J_'
\ �� � i
. /�� �\� \ �\ . �� �-y ��
�
/ \\ . \ � �` � � y . `�-� ` . ..
/ �� ; �' � \� � r� �- ��� \ �.6
, ; �° / � ` �� ' �� �� ���J�
,
`,�__���, � � �� , \ i-� �
' it ��a� �f-° � \ /
� \ /
r , _ _ � ..
\�� ---- r -_T_��� _
\� \ \\ ..�\\� \����\
� , F"'�—".��- -- --
f �/� � � �'1 �� �� .��_����� —
� i�//-��.� ,; , \ � - , .
� � ��� ��„ � �:\ �� `
� , ��\ 1 � \�� I � � ' �
�
� �J ; _.
y
� \ 1 ����� '
, 1 1���� .� �—��� \.
��
�'��—__�� �\ \�
�, ` �
--__ �
1 � � � '
//_'� � F r � 1
r
. . oaeao�o� �inn _ N
,�. , a.ow,. "rrr .w 7y.���t .�p Q
'�'°° "'°"°"°'� �3QOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3alOJ L.,,, ,,,,..,a,,.
,-�.,�..,.�,�.�
�g
�8
��
. �
3
= i
�s =- �
�t : � j �
�
-- � � - � � �
x � � �
n
�� 3
�
' z
5
�
Z
W
o W
' � � =
• �� m ,
'� � �� z '
� a . Sv y i
��� � W •
� ��� .
. i�
,- , u
�
� . �
� /��--�
�� I
� ` ��' � �
1 a
¢
O
O,
J
LL
0
N � Z
Z.— � O �
• '�`8; � c�7 �
3— � _!
r Z ,
z� r~n :
� x -
w .
E
� � oanao�o. � �inn ,
�°,,..,,,,,,,�:� � '1340W3li 3S(lOH �Id3d N�d�OJ Lw,,,in,.�,�,� 'Q'
�
3�
�
�
_ 3a
�
, � r
_ � ��
�
�n ��
F �
�£
�7
�
1� � �
�o ,
N �
2
�N �
�- �� � �� II
� � o i
� �p I I
C� ,�i �
jZ. i
�* � lO �
Y� � ~ �~$ �W
Q ��� ;� �
��� Z ,
� � ,; ; ,
�
zo � ix - �
30 'W •
Zg ° �R '
_� a
�18
� ~
�
; �g � �
L
3 1�
��
TF
� O� .�-
1 '�, z
'J
, a
�, �,
o,
, ;p
J
� �
O '
G � .
H �
I � � � Z �
� 'L� < F- .
i � � �n ,
� x -
�
I
I
I
I
l
� � ; oadao�o� �inn � �--,
�.�5e ..b��..o'�a" .r I- � -- :�R��a� ..n `d'
,�,,,o,,,..,,�,,,,.,� , � -l3QOW3a 3Sf10H �V3d N�IOJ �. �. y„� .w..,.� ;`�
. ,�'`
.
:
, .
,
, �
`� ��
;
i�� �
; .
�
,- +
.
` ,� r .
0
� ���
� .
, ;
��-
,
,
, �.
, .
_ , ,
, ,,, ; .
� r . i
\, �/ O i�� , .
v ���
� � ,
IQ
Q'
O _ I� I
�f.I
� Ij � ,
�� ♦
O Z11
F- -
;G� •
— �
iW �.
� ��� o
�
r ,
i �
(
O
� �_
i j,
a
�
O .
O
¢ � .
O = '
2 �
F-
� i
X �
W .
O On o
�
� � OadaO i�? ` '�IdA �
su� ....o,., "'� "'� .. -� .:L�sf�A�_.1�0. �
�;�,,..,,�„p:,� 13401�1I3li 3S(lOH �V3d R3alOJ L.,,, _,a..,m,. �
_� �_ � .
O� C)'�` ---� .
� � � �� o �
o�= E�� '� '�
, ,� ,i�
► -��� �
E'= o�o � � .
�. � �� ;� o � .
� o�a �� .� --�i�. ,
� E�� �� �= � �� > � -
, d ,
,_ �� I� � II W �
o��.i� � = o --�3 �'
� - �r o- , o
� �, �
` °'� il
t �- �� .
I�
I' �
I
I�
. , i _ __
�- �
�
oc � q
� x
�� O� C- �I � .
� o
,� C= ., _ --�
_� � .W o = p .
, -
�, C= � W ° 0 0 �i - --
� ° �I
I' O E='! 113 � O � 00
C �
��� ��
': °_ . � ---.�1� � 0 0 j►
�; o= . ° 0 0 I� i
o= 0 0 •
I
� - �� jl
I jj
I
� � o c o- �_ --� ---�►
0 � - � I; o.� 0�1 0 0 �I
J
� ;; ����� 0 I �
N
� � I m
0 � II O � U�.J� 0 I c
I
� �o
o �I.� o O O��[' I ���
I °o o° !� m � ���C= ��d
� �W
0 0 0 � � ��� I
_ ,-_
� - �, o ����� � ��M
1 4
� � e'�0 � � �.� , �,� �C Q
O 0 ii N �iZ c�
I � ��W o � I
� ��� �
--�f W �
�� O I O E. � '.
�
. . 1, � . -- �� - aadao�o _� �idn ,��s�,� .� �
�,,..,�,,,,,�,� ; � � ."13QOW3a 3Sf10H �113d N3alOJ � z��� -�� a
� ,
,
:
� ��
��
:J •
Q .
2 �
W �
� W •
�� �
< "
�O
�'
.% ` '
;1�� -
1,'' �/'��
j ^ . 1 ,,�%y� : • . - -
(=�� �i Y���'3(,��� - ,
�. � �`v
, � �1
;Y� • `� ' ii'�'��}, .
- ry � I {� f-�' �/�i � ,
��, � .� _
•- �� ' , �
� ,� , i
, , �
a ti''1. � .
• ' I
'I\ �J •� :.'� �.. I i •
� � b� i
� !�I I
., " '� , `� �
�� �
t
, . .
� �
�:� � .
.. �� � �t `�L �
�� �?J I
:� �o • �', • .
, ; ,
o : g
, = P
� �„
� ,
,
u �
�, � .,,, � �.,'� -oavaoio�_�in�_ _ :ti,
��i�v.� . ,.a
'°q"" "'°'°"°" '13aOW3b 3Sf10H �d3d N3a10J. z�r� -�� a'
.�,..,,�w.�
.
� �
:
z
, ,�
a
:a
. ,� ,
�,
0
: � ;� ��
d `
�, Z �
O �
oC —
. �1 ��?.
r
t
�
A
/�w� �� ���t + .
/
� �:
` � ��� *
\ t + •�
Y �l �n:
\ �: #-
��\� + Igj .
�
� � �i :'9�
{� iii
� . �' ` • -
-� . !f �
i
' �
i
t7 �
. � � �
y
�, '
�������������
' �� �
Ir
1
�T 1
1- �,
u ,��I
_� �tI{I I
\\ _ _-_/_Yl_-__
� � Oada0�0:�,, �IdA ,�i��i.� ..a �:
'�'°� '"°'"°"°°'° � l3QOW3li 3Sf10H �113d N3alOJ za�� -�� a�
,�airRW..�cFw,a.uoo.ia�
� •
•
�Z
��
'J
a
'�
jOo
�
0
�� ,
D '
Z
� i0 i
\\� i W \
�� �t� .
. ��
�
e ��
��. ��
�:
T
N�
'y%
f � �
�.
�±� •� � I
O,
N
'r�': �� �
1 �I I�
.�� /' I Z
" `a'.� I
�'"� �
�� � �_ l a, o
�°,� a�� - �i� I
� "�-- '' I
� �x: I
i
I
,�, �
I
�� I; �:
, � I
��,, � i
r7'I
'.'e� .a,l,
I, �, ;L'I
, • -�
� � ,� � o
� �
i� '� I
'+
; � ;�� I
� p' •
I`i J,i
'_r� I
�91 i
�
�,. • ,,,,,4�, •�., OOdaOlO.,..,' �IdA u�,�o� .� v�
u"°'°� '"'°"°'�°'° �3aOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3alOJ zo�� »�� a
�..�a.�
� .
:
!Y
;<
:d
0 0
;O `
i� �
- .� �'� �� i
\ \
� � -
��� ���
� �
w �
�
�. \\�
��
��
M I ��\.;
° �i
\\\
�' J \\\:.
O� •� /
A
�� �
\\\�\` ,�� � �~I
�
�\� A i
�+, / � •
, � s
�" �i
m�
��`'� s.
e. � w:
�`. �� � .
�\�\� � ��
�.:��. o� � _ .
\\<`.�'�.:. .
��\�,:
�
�o� � ryy:
� I n
- I -..
3� � �
�
V,
;
; ;.�.
. . .�
I �
�i il
I _ �
' i
, ��j �I
� �i
1
I
I y
L_J___
- . �Qda�10:�„ 1�bn �O,
�. • ....o,.� ""' z�rii/n ..a r�;
��.•,,��� l3QOW3a 3S(lOH �d3d N3a'10J z��� -�� �d
I
i
i
•
J �
♦
•
�
I�
lO •
�� O
Ir •
� �
� I'� �
�/ - I
. \
\\;\ •
r�I �
�'�r I
/ I f�\
�
�\ ��.
�\� ��
„\ \ r.
\ �
\\�
\ �'
i
� �
� .
- � � oaeaoio: �ivn �
ou s.�o,.� � .r.�� i � , .`� . .. :�/zVot ..a r
'�'°`4 �°'�°�°" l3QOW3li 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ = Le�� .w.•�� d�
�Fw..,+Nw�w.�oo.�
.
�
��<
• 'J
�
. � �
O �
O �
� � �
T� �
,' � �
�� � � �
.
� ,1t: .
' / � ��
>
\�..
-. ..
.
.
� .
� � . ��'�i .
.'� � .
� � �
\ � �
� \
�
/
\ /
�
��� \
� ` �
� I � i
,��i , I� i
,��� I �
,�� �
�'I�,I�lil I'IIIIII'' �
s i
- . ; ,, oadao�o;. �idn N
a. . a.�,.�.,, .s� _ - � �. . � T�/c,�el ..o r,
'°'°` "°"°`°" '13aOW3li 3St10H �Id3d N3a�OJ =�+� -�� a'
�..�aa�w.�.as
. �0
�
;�o
< ,
.� .,i �
�
. �\ � � i
.� \ A �
� �� ,� �
�\ EC .
� �
�
� • . �/�
� . . . � \\
� . � ";- , i
. . � , �
. � , �
. , ,
. , .
, ,
. ; r
� . , ,-
. . . ; �
, . . , ,�
;' � . . ; <
.�
: ,.' � �y ,
`. R :� � ,
` ' i
;� �l ,}
� \ �' i
\,� � � ;• •� � .
,'
r\\\\\ /� I � �
\�� I ,illil ''II,I� �
i
�� � �������'I����' � ---- �
� , �i�l ''�! _�
� �' ���i" � ,��I�" �,�
, ���i� � ,
�,, i,.
r------ ---r�j
� ; ,
' I
�
�
� T -�
i � '
i
i
i i
, 1-------i i--------�
�-------�
�.. �.� ,,,, oadao�o� �,�inn ���,�� .� r
,�;,..,,�,�"�� l3aOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3alOJ ��� �� a
- --�
= - I
-- - � � , I
� � ... �
� �
_� �
_ � � � i �
_ � ; - I
I � � I
-__ i —_ , I
-- _ � . i
I _ I
I - I
I - I
I ,� I
_ � � _ - , �
� � I
I ;'' -
� � - I
� -- � �
� -_ _ � � ;
�-__ � I --_ _- > �
-_= - �� I __
• � � . • •
� • • � � •
�
%���I����`���-___.
_ _
.r �� ,; - =
:,�, � � ;_
"s' ��� I� �r
E I " �j'� `� . •
trcq. � ' �. �
'�,�_� �iC'I�I ��
��� =�'�y�`a��`�-n -�� ,�,, -��„
1� , � ��� � � �� :,.—�.,, �— ; .
,�:� r o'!r� ` �� �'���li�=all
�i_ � I �'s ITI � •
����\,���, �_'I'[� =I� '' A !��,
� ��: �'_ �'— � = �.'�'�. -
__ �i�_:�I-.-°q4 �_ ii_ _;/._- � .
.���'=-,'� �''z .__-r�i��_ II
'" ili �T=!I��I�� I �` �:�I�� ���
��I',_—�s I�_ .�_ — �f�Ae�!Is�• �+.:�I�\-.
��::c !.C1��' � =I `. •►�!• � ���j i�:���
���=������11�-�=�I� �,= _� �� �=�--__�
—_ - — �' �! , __!���_� �L�
�,-�—i,� ,I��—�;�,�i���,
j�i=�,�=p• �, ��� �G=` _'���I-�_�{- __+����,
'�y:���, c�r�i�f�,� '--.�� � , ('f_�_ �`��
_��� -_— � , ;=aA'I�=�i._,.s,=;.�L=��
�•--+� -�'r-�I �� T��� I � ���I���
�.,--���r-_ x�:-` _i
_j �I " r.: r_._�!�
T ��` � r–. � � �� I _i�Ei I��" =i
-� ' � ,1=� _� -, �I � � !�=I --
�� 11 _��`:�1=i=�; ' �_ �' " �'�=���
�< -, :!��'�r=;���=���ia_ �
«.� �—�_.� li �� ,,E:,,_. .— �. .. .�
� �__�= - �: �= - .
�,�- , _,�- ,.,:-,���-, ,
.:;,',,: •'I:.�'=�`' �) .�I:�i�=�l
3 � r�lf,, -=1
��� i '�� � ��
c,���-i,Xt f��:l �'_� '�' f_'_'_ -
-�----I�f'' ( C :I�. �� v►�I� �--_c
-� � r:ll !- `'il�`. '°�',i. �=�, ,
,:-- .
=i-_=�i - ,�__
� �-�=���=� .��- ����
f�'_.�C�: .. _ I
�I_'�' �= �' :;..,�_��:.
- -_ -- • `��__
�:�.e��� ,� � !I
�1 r''•. =4:i a�' '1
1��� �_r_,: ! u��
���i�s�� ,—.-i-'i,��,na �� �,
��_°�_��������— ' -Ilr =-� =t—`• �
' �� I���,��fi ��� �
II��i ��r as
��i_ � I ���gN �
-�� � 91�
' ��
, !1l'�,I� 11.
1 �� ��
� �df q
�� �I� �S N�
\�
I, �o
q�jq� �
_ �
i �; � I i
I
I
�
' oadao�o� nnn �
, �..,. .,. ,�n,i� .� .-
�a'°° "°"'°W"' �3QOW3a 3Sf10H �IV3d N34lOJ z�r -�� a
��..�..,,�w.�
. -
a�.
�
�
J
�
2
<
W
C
<
_
dl
�
2
�Q . N
�r 1
� z �
. ,
J �
a �
W �
F-
N
�
� \
�\
3 ��
\
� \\
\\ \�
� J
\ •
\
\
V
�/ ', \
\
c`�� \ ��\ i � (J
`1��� \\ . �
�`�, � , I
� I
N r S \ 3 I •
p* .�,';��. {�; � Il� I �1
�9 O.` �� � /` i� I O �
\\,
i� � `�� �� L �
, . O � � � .
�; � , �
u� � , I
3� �, � i
� • i
�
I
� : I r�
a
�y�Q ' s{t� r
. la�1y � f2� � � --- —�
�--iasr�, ..._.
O \\
�
S
b
�
�
C
�
,1 , \
� , S
�n
��
r�
� . . , . �9 i�-�G,(FFi�S� � .�f i, r . -,� .
. 'i �
tI� { , � � .. ... ';!.k;. �fir' :�t... f . . ;:,ir� .
y. . _
y �, �
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE REMODEL
VAIL, COLORADO
A P�c�pns�il.f�,r
ACICIIIII)11, Renvvatio�T arlcl Ex��un.s�ion
PREPARED FOR:
THE TOVI'v OF \'AIL AND �THE GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ASSOC'IATI�N
PREPAREU I3Y:
SNO�'�'DON AtiD HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
20] Gore Creek Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
AND
PETER JAMAR ASSOC(ATES, INC.
108 South Fronta�;e Road
Suite 308
Vail, Colorado �1657
AND
JOHN 1�4. PERKINS, ARCHITECT
P.O. Box 266
Vail, Colorado 81 G58
November 22, 1991
�
� � - ' • ` - �.
, ,..
. , ,
, �
I . INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to present information regarding a
re-development proposal for the Golden Peak House located upon
Lots A and B, Block 2 , Vail Village First Filing. These parcels
of land are located in the heart of Vail Village at the base of
the Vail Ski Area and the intersection of Bridge Street and
Hanson Ranch Road.
This report addresses the various requirements of the Town of
Vail Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations and is divided into
the following three sections :
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This section of the report describes the development proposal and
the existing conditions upon the site . Proposed development
statistics and standards are presented in this section as well as
impacts of the proposal . Zoning considerations are also
discussed.
DESIGN REGULATIONS
This section of the report describes the design intent of the
proposal and addresses compliance of the proposal with the Vail
Village Urban Design Considerations and the Vail Village Master
Plan.
SUMMARY
This section is a brief summary of the key points of the
proposal .
, � , � � r
-•� � Page 2
II . PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Golden Peak House was constructed in 1966 and currently
consists of retail shops, bars and restaurants, a barber shop,
and 18 dwelling units (condominiums ) . virtually no major upgrade
or renovation of the structure has been completed since the
building' s initial construction and the building is physically in
need of major renovation.
Coupled with the Association ' s need to renovate and upgrade the
building physically is the overall Community need to upgrade the
building design in order to fit into what has become a certain
design "vocabulary" in Vail Village. The Golden Peak House is
architecturally very different from all other buildings within
Vail Village and was constructed with a very odd roof which is no
longer, and may never have been, appropriate for the prominent
site at the top of Bridge Street. A major aspect of this
development proposal is to renovate the structure in a manner
which results in a recognition of the distinctive design
character of Vail Village . These design aspects of the proposal
are discussed in the next section, Design Considerations , of this
report .
The redevelopment proposal for the structure consists of a total
renovation of the existing building which includes the major
modification of the roof to gable roof forms , the addition of
dormers , balconies, bay windows , arcades, and other architectural
projections resulting in a totally different appearance of the
building. In addition, the dining deck on the south side of the
building is proposed to be enlarged to accommodate additional
seating ( see Site Plan) with a portion of the deck having the
ability to be enclosed during inclement weather. The existing
elevations of the building and proposed elevations are shown.
The addition of the 4/12 pitch gable roof results in the infill
of the "valley" portions of the existing "butterfly" roof
structure . Consequently, this results in the ability to
construct a majority of the new development within the envelope
of the existing building.
As well as exterior changes to the structure, interior changes
are proposed which will result in more efficient use of space,
better circulation throughout the building, improved access, and,
most importantly of all , the ability to utilize the residential
units much better as guest accommodations with the addition of a
functional "hotel" lobby on the second floor level .
� �.._ � �,
� Page 3 � •�
A. DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS
The following table indicates , numerically, the existing and
proposed floor areas for the Golden Peak Hou�e.
1991 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
BASEMENT FLOOR
"The Slope" 1 , 320 530 1 , 850
Ski Shop 780 495 1 , 275
Storage 1 , 118 7 1, 125
"Los Amigos" 0 645 645
Common 1 , 044 146 1 , 190
4 , 262 1 , 823 6, 085 .
GROUND FLOOR
Barber Shop 154 35 189
Commercial/Retail 3 , 941 1 , 295 5 , 236
Common 1 , 309 < 561 > 748
5 , 404 769 6, 173
SECOND FLOOR
Restaurant 1 , 260 970 2 , 230
Restaurant Greenhouse 0 370 370
Dwelling Units
( 8 existing/4 proposedj 2 , 960 < 312 > 2 , 648
Common 1 , 604 < 300> 1 , 304
5, 824 728 6, 552
THIRD FLOOR
Dwelling Units
( 8 existing/7 proposed) 4 , 220 723 4 , 943
Accommodation Units
( 0 existing/2 proposed) 0 700 700
Common 1 , 604 < 764 > 840
5 , 824 659 6 , 483 �
' � �
' ' , Page 4
,
1991 PROPOSAL
EXISTING ADDITIONAL TOTAL
FOURTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
(2 existing/4 proposed) 2 , 681 2 , 780 5 , 461
Accommodation Units
( 0 existing/4 proposed) 0 250 250
Common 125 465 590
2 , 806 3 , 495 6, 301
FIFTH FLOOR
Dwelling Units
( 0 existing/1 proposed) 0 3 , 385 3 , 385
Common 0 215 215
Loft 0 300 300
0 3 , 900 3 , 900
GRAND TOTALS : 24 , 120 11 , 289 35, 486
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------
TOTALS BY USE :
Dwelling Units 9 , 861 6 , 876 16, 737
Accommodation Units 0 950 950
Common 5 , 686 < 799> 4 , 887
Retail 4 , 875 1 , 825 6, 700
Restaurant 2 , 580 2 , 515 5 , 095
Storage 1 , 118 7 1 , 125
� � � . '�,
Page 5 •
B. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The Golden Peak House is currently located within the Commercial
Core One Zone District . The combined site area of the two lots
which it occupies is 6, 915 square feet . The Golden Peak House is
currently located adjacent to the Agricultural and Open Space
Zone District which is indicated upon the Town of Vail ' s proposed
Village Master Plan and Land Use Plan as Ski Base/Recreation
District.
In order to provide for the re-development of the Golden Peak
House it is proposed that this area be re-zoned to a Special
Development District ( SDD) . As stated in the Vail Zoning Code,
"the purpose of Special Development Districts is to encourage
flexibility in the development of land in order to promote its
most appropriate use, and to improve the design, character and
quality of new development . It is believed that through a
Special Development District, this parcel of land can be
developed to meet both the objectives of the property owners and
the overall Community and result in a high quality development
which ���ill be an asset to the Town of Vail .
The base "underlying" zone district for the SDD will bc CC1
(Commercial Core One) since the uses proposed generally
correspond to this zone district.
As in any Special Development District, the development
standards, including lot area, site dimensions , setbacks, height,
density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking are as
indicated upon the Development Plans and are determined by the
Planning and Environmental Commission and approved by the Town
Council .
The Development Standards for the proposed SDD are as follows :
Lot Area:
The total size of the SDD will be 6, 912 total square feet plus
2 , 065 square feet of deck easements as indicated upon the Site
Plan and will include Lots A and B, Block 2 , Vail Village First
Filing and such easements .
Site Dimensions:
The site dimensions will be as indicated upor. the Site Plan.
Setbacks:
Setbacks will be as indicated on upon the Site Plan. Building
setbacks varying from less than 1 foot on the north and west and
1 foot on the east property boundaries . Existing overhang
easements will be recognized on the north and west sides of the
building (which are 6 feet ) ; and on the south side (which is 10
f eet) .
� ' � �
: . _ Page 6
•� .
Heiqht:
Building height will be as indicated upon the building elevations
which is 56 feet at the highest point of the gable roof located
in the eastern portion of the Development and 41 feet at the
highest point in the western portion of the Development . The
greenhouse enclosure will not exceed 10 feet in height .
Densitv:
Density will be as indicated on the Development Plans .
Site Coveraae:
Site coverage will be as indicated upon the Site Plan.
Landscapinq:
Landscaping will be as shown on the Landscape Plan and as finally
approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board.
Parkina•
Parking will be calculated in accordance with the Town of Vail
Zoning Code and additional spaces required will be provided for
by contribution to the Town Parking Fund.
Permitted Use•
Permitted uses, conditional uses, and accessory uses will be
those specified with the CC1 Zone District .
Other applicable zoning issues relating to CC1 are addressed in
this proposal .
� �`„�` ' �
Page 7 .
, .
C. IMPACTS
The Town of Vail Department of Community Development has
requested that the potential changes or impacts resulting from
the proposal be evaluated according to the following identified
conditions .
Hvdrologic Conditions:
The only hydrologic condition which will change as a result
of the proposal is an improvement of the various surface
drainage conditions both around the perimeter of the site
and upon the building itself . Roof drainage will be
substantially upgraded with the building renovation as well
as the installation of a new surface drainage system around
the building which will be designed to improve existing
drainage problems .
Atmospheric Conditions:
Tne renovation of the building will result in the addition
of gas fireplaces which will meet Town of Vail standards and
five existing wood burning fireplaces will be reused in the
proposal .
Geologic Conditions :
There will be no impact upon land forms , slopes, soils, or
potential hazards resulting from the proposal .
Noise and Odor:
There will be no significant impact upon these environmental
conditions . A potential exists that the upgrade of
restaurant kitchen facilities such as exhaust fans could
reduce any current odors which might exist from these
facilities . Any noise which might emanate from the outdoor
dining area will conform to Town of Vail standards regarding
noise levels .
Visual Conditions:
Visual changes resulting from this proposal are discussed
within the next section, Design Considerations , of this
report .
Land Use Conditions:
The proposal will not result in any changes or negative
impacts upon characteristics of uses , compatibility with
officially approved land use and open space policies or
objectives . The land uses proposed are entirely consistent
with adopted and proposed land use plans .
� ' • • �
. Page 8
� Circulation and Transportation Conditions:
In terms of pedestrian circulation the proposal results in a
very positive impact due to the upgrade of the major access
to Vail Mountain which exists between the Golden Peak House
and the Hill Building. Drainage, grades, and surface
condition improvements all will enhance the pedestrian flow
through this area. Delivery conditions will be altered by
the removal of the existing trash dumpsters in the skier
access which will result in a positive impact.
� ,�;r, ie��
7�.� G i��
� � ' '
Page 9 � •
III . BESIGN CONSIDERATIONS �
As mentioned in the previous section of the report, a certain
distinctive design character has evolved within Vail Village
which, through the implementation of the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan, is encouraged to be followed in the
redevelopment of existing structures . The following responds to
the stated Design Considerations and describes how the proposal
will be consistent with the established character of Vail Village
and Bridge Street and how the proposal will make positive
contributions to the quality of life.
Design Statement:
The Golden Peak House Building is the most prominent building in
Vail Village . It is located at the "top" of Bridge Street and
serves as visual focus for pedestrians moving up Bridge Street .
The building is a contemporary mid-60 ' s design with a curious
inverted roofline that is out of context with its surrounding
neighbors and the village environment. The roofline and the
north facade make the building read as a sheer vertical wall
cutting off the street from Vail Mountain . The building has
fallen into disrepair and features cracked and peeling stucco,
plywood balconies in need of repair or replacement, and other
general areas of decline . It is a prime candidate for a major
redesign.
In redesigning the Golden Peak House it is important to address
the building' s verticality and somewhat imposing vertical scale .
Also, the building' s cold and hard relationship with Bridge
Street, i.e. its "meeting with grade" . This relationship with
grade is equally important on the mountain side and west traffic
corridor.
The building is in great need of a renewed identity that meshes
with the architecture of Vail Village . A gable roof is the most
reasonable approach to blending the building into the Village.
The upper floors on the Hanson Ranch Road side have been set back
for the enhancement of street enclosure and sun/shade
considerations . The gable roof has then been placed in such a
manner as to have its highest points well back from the front
edge of the building face .
By creating a covered arcade-like north facade at grade with a
transparent horizontal facade, the building will both meet the
street in a more human scale and provide a horizontal base . The
extension also breaks the overpowering verticalness of the
present arrangement. It is logical that this horizontal base of
windows turn the corner and continue along the west elevation,
creating interest and interaction at a human scale between the
building and the ski traffic moving through to the mountain.
Development of this "throat" or narrow passage will need special
treatment and coordination between all adjoining property owners
and comply with the new guidelines established by the latest Town
of Vail streetscape plan .
� � • ' ' • � Page 10
� Verticality is less of an issue at the south elevation because
grade is one level higher. The roofline on the south is
therefore more capable of taking large openings (windows ) because
its horizontal influence is less needed or required. The south
elevation should present a pleasant and exciting character in
equal response to the activity and excitement of the Vista Bahn.
The building offers great and exciting potential for a very
successful and pleasing re-design. It can be re-designed to meet
the needs of the owners and to achieve congruence with the
architectural context of Vail Village.
Pedestrianization:
Pedestrianization of upper Bridge Street and of the Vista Bahn
access alley will be improved with the proposal . The building' s
varying front facade at grade, and the covered arcade-like canopy
will draw people to the building. The skier access alleyway will
be cleaned up with the removal of trash dumpsters, improved
drainage, and upgraded ground surface materials . This area is a
viable public art site as it will become a mini-plaza inviting
the pedestrian to enter, experience, and move through.
Streetscape Framework:
The streetscape framework will be greatly improved with the
addition of bay windows, and the arcade-like roof canopy. These
architectural features will be more in keeping with the Urban
Design Guide Plan and other existing buildings in the Village .
The bay windows will be covered with a soffit varying from 2 feet
to 6 feet of overhang. The overhang soffit will give a protected
intimate environment for the window viewer . The changing
overhang condition (varying depth) will create an interesting
space to experience as opposed to one consistent window and
overhang relationship for the 110 linear feet of store front.
The Streetscape Framework will have the added interest of the
large gabled entry at the entry to the Golden Peak House Lodge
(main entry) and secondary canopies ( 3 ) at the entries to major
building tenants . Similar entry canopies have been utilized on
the remodeled Plaza Building with successful results .
Street Enclosure:
The street enclosure will be enhanced by the more human scaled
bay windows , and entry canopies . The enclosure will feel
somewhat lessened by the proposed stepping back of upper floors .
The sheer vertical north facade will feel much less vertical .
Also the gabled roof form will give a more varied, interesting
upper enclosure than the present long horizontal line of the roof
of the existing east mass . The enclosures stepping back will
mitigate the sheer verticality of the buildings north facade.
� � Page 11 � . . -
The skier access alley will become a semi-enclosed mini plaza
with potential placement for benches , landscaping or public art
locations as developed by the latest Town of Vail Streetscape
Plan.
Street Edqe•
Street edge will be greatly enhanced. Snowmelted brick pavers
will meet the building edge at grade and the in and out offsets
of the protected bay windows, and building entry ways will add
much needed interest. The elimination of the service stair from
grade down to the basement at the northeast corner of the
building will greatly increase the lin�ar footage of street edge
with bay windows adding transparency. Small planters on grade
and planter boxes will add color and charm to the street edge.
Stone veneer work will be a featured material at the street edge
at the west facade.
The skier access plaza can be a feature "pocket" area and �
surfaces will be greatly improved and benches and landscaping can
be added to tie into the latest Town of Vail Streetscape Plan.
Building Height/Views and Focal Points:
The proposed gable roof additions will only be 7 feet and 11 feet
higher (at the Ridge Line) than the highest points of the
existing roofs on the east and west building masses . These ridge
lines are well back from the street edge facade as the present
roofs are. The gable roof pitches down at a 4/12 pitch to points
along the current roof height . The west mass, because it is
turned 90°, infills the existing open end of the butterfly roof
form. The western-most sideu�all height is unchanged.
The focal point of the Riva Ridge Ski Run is maintained from
Bridge Street view points , and further analysis will demonstrate
that the mountain view will be enhanced by the reduction of flat
building mass . The 4/12 gable roof form, as recommended by the
Design Considerations is more in keeping with the architectural
fabric of Vail Village and will be a major improvement to upper
Bridge Street. The new roof form has been designed and placed
over the existing building masses as carefully and considerately
as possible . It is felt that the minimal increases are far
outweighed by the advantages gained.
Views from the new Vail Parking Garage and through the skier
accessway demonstrate minimal encroachments into established view
corridors . These encroachments are of negligible impact .
� ,' � �
•, � Page 12
Sun/Shade:
The proposed building design will have minimal impact on (area in
shadow) the sun/shade relationship on Seibert Circle and upper
Bridge Street. By stepping the upper floors back the sun angle
( 50�) hits less of the building at the points of critical shadow
impact. These studies will be further analyzed as the planning
process proceeds .
Service and Deliverv:
Deliveries and trash pick-up will continue to be at the northeast
corner of the building. The existing dumpsters located in the
Vista Bahn access alley will be eliminated. A trash compaction
unit will be installed in the basement and the trash bales will
be lifted to the main level off the new service elevator. The
elevator will replace the exterior service stairway at
approximately the same location . Removal of the trash dumpsters
from the alley will greatly improve the high traffic, busy �
pedestrian area .
Sub Area Concepts:
Two Sub-Area Concepts are indicated within the Vail Village Urban
Design Guideplan and Vail Village Master Plan which relate to the
development proposal . The first of these concepts is #9 ( 3 .2 )
which discusses a commercial ground floor expansion in order to
improve the pedestrian scale at the base of the building and to
provide for greater transparency as an activity generator on
Seibert Circle . The Vail Town Council has previously determined
that this design concept should not be accomplished by means of
the ten foot encroachment onto public right-of-way encouraged by
the Guideplan . The Council indicated that they would prefer to
attempt to achieve these goals through a combination of bay
windows , overlays , and other architectural projections on the
facade of the building. In response to this direction the
current proposal has improved the pedestrian scale utilizing
these features and providing increased transparency while not
encroaching on to Town property.
Sub-area concept #l0A ( 3 . 3 ) indicates an area for "mountain
gateway improvements" including landscaping and a minor plaza.
As mentioned previously the proposal includes these features
within the identified area and the result will be a greatly
improved "gateway" to Vail Mountain and tie into the Town of Vail
latest streetscape plan.
� � ' � -
Page 13 • � •
IV. SUMMARY
The proposal results in the accomplishment of the following major
goals :
1 } The redevelopment of one of Vail ' s most prominent
locations in a manner which is consistent with the Vail
Village Urban Design Guideplan and Vail Village Master
Plan;
2 ) A substantial improvement of site and landscape
conditions in an area which is the major portal to Vail
Mountain.
It is clear when reviewing the developmental proposal that this
is truly a project in which everyone benefits . The Golden Peak
House Association benefits from the major upgrade and renovation
of the building in terms of bringing the building into
conformation with current building codes and life safety
requirements . The overall community benefits in terms of the
major upgrade and enhancement of an area which is currently an
eyesore . Most importantly, the Vail visitor benefits by the
improvement of the Vail Village experience which will be improved
both aesthetically and functionally, leaving a lasting impression
of a high quality experience .
�
�
� �
...�.. �
��
w �y
�t ���� '
'�1 �. E.•: 1 �
� C s�,
. .�»� �:s�!!I►� �--� '
�,� - ._...,.�.:��:
/_ _ �; . ri�� �::�
� • M •� (�'^ �■�
• '� ��.
- � •�:
T�"-'12.' L . �~� •� �� ��� -
�'� .•1 � �� .
� ,�4�t �Q :j �1 ..
�j�K.� .�.�� - � = �/1 .
�;�i. �vr � •
!,!C':' ; ;�- �� i�i ��
���; �� � ��� � :
,• ' �i� �_�
� �w•
���' ��, -� ��. ..
. , � .
�. R!!! � • ."���
N� �� -�
� �
'N �ti. ��
� t= _
:�i=l 1 � c
3 � _
,��.#�':. �==i� � s � .
� s � �� ���!
��°.." ^..�_ ^� ,
� .�'� . ...— =�---- ,
� , , �11 .
I M � _�._ti � ��. �M - .
�� _
_ �
; ,� �, _ � �+ ��--�
:' � �i�� �•.�
; � �=' �� �, � �.. ,
� � �� � '-- � � s �'' � ��
. .. -
,� ' '� �:� -----
�� n� �) ,��� �m
� r ' • �_� :
�•,- �� �,_ ,� r.
�� �r�= �- ,_ ���L �
, ��� -��� '� � �--�
��� � �=-- ,
a ` � ���:��� -�. i_ �..:. �.•� •
, ,� � ��
/A'�.:� .... �... �. �'� i
v��•� �_ � � ���
�
; ►" '': , � �� � ��'�
� „ �_ �= �' ��o.
� •::t!• �� , �� ' .�:� �i'�
� � � � - -
.�. .� �
4 '!� �
�w -� _ � ��• _
....
� '�.� .: .' •
� .� �� ���� � �� - � •
i w��
��l'�� - -
el:'�p — _�—
�� l�
� ,�. ���' '��
/ , ��� � ��I _ ��� �
.�.. - � '� _� �i 1
-- � „� 1 I � �--- _ ,�t' •
� '_�
�� � i �i� L� /N �
� � �� .�i � �� �� �
� � i���
- —- :.�..��� � - -
�� ��ii ii I=� �� .
�. � � �, �� ��
.�.. C�� .�.� ��� ,I
� u.� �
� + ~r • ._� ��� � ��
��
" 1�� ��
.� .�= � -
� �� q• — �_ �..._.y,� �� �/ � �
� � iii�� ��� �I� ��� ,
�
'� r�= �:�:� �!� ��"Z' - �
`� r � � �� a��'"� — � �
� .- a
• 4�� i ��1� °`�
r ,�.
� � —- :� �� '��r
s� I
,�• � � I,�- I�i� ;r,y
� �'�, �� - ;C � -
� .�� _.`� � �� ��
���� � � � ��� 1.
�- i ji.�... � �� '�
-
� ►��. �_ ��
- �. p� '� • �:� :. "
-
�� ��.� � --s ��a
` i�
-
I � �'� .'� ���� �
� �
i� '; _ --*'� �
' ,� , - _� �
i ���, �I�� ��=_ �
�i -- -� =1�C=:= ;
���.���� =l�_:� ,
�� �� ��
1� _:�� j� .1
� _�, _�'=� _
I �' " - i �
.� �:'�. = c=:
.., �i-::►�_: i ��
-� �—-. =�C_:�1 �.7
� ..,_ ;
�I n��■ .•��. j
� ��"� ,
�s ��..�.i.�:.i-,���� ,�.....��
/ .'�� � ��
�I����as� ._�, _�
�:::' '�C_ � �Cl�� .
..,_M ,—_ � .�� �
:� 1��
� �-�--- ' � ii L_•■•+._ i
.�� �" � �JI ,
\\' � �� N� � �� ,
. � �� � � C� �
'" �.■.� .
-
�� � ws ��'�' ' e
:; �
.•. •
I/�., �� � �%i� ,� ��.
� �� t1
�, �� w �`�
� �
� � •w
1�!J�1� 1� ���
� �'� �
� �
,, �_! �i� _ ��� I' �ii i ��',a
��11�'' �' •,�,,��.'r�.w�..i.i. �i
�
• ,}� �`� �
i� � ,�� � •1 �
� ;�t •�'� � , �
•_ �� ��s_ ��', I� ���' �
I .,,, � �� -- S
� ---_- —
1
:--�:
I� ; 1 I�s��� + � - -
� � � � I — —
�� �. .
��
.�.� �r� �,�-,��` = �
� �• - --�nr�
•',i (��• ���
�� {�� � '��� �.`�..��
� ..._��� � rt����'
� � �tr ■1���
��, , ! ���s �, ���'��
���: �� �,��� IAI ��I
, t.� �...� �� .s��,..:1
+ , �� �' IR�I li�l
� '�I :����i■i "'.�.�.'i
'�'; ��....� ....��
, .�..... ...�.. �,v_i, i�i
�� ::� .��--- �...,.�.. -
��'� �.��=�i'.� .���
� �Or��l!�'---
� � '� ; ���:. � .....�,,��
� .P ;; � ; :� ---, _
� �• '_ ''-='1��� ��i�
} i .��w ,�.���..
��;,� 1 ,�� '
� .�i�;..�� .� ,� ,�.. � ��,,,
;. .
�. � � -
,
� � �_ ��� ..�..�.� .
y'� ' �� a...�..� �� — --:
�����.�.�-
�:_.�.�" +. C �
1�- �--�l���� -
1 II ��'��-�����Y..�lr
1 '�� �
L� \ ��
R~� ` ��
w ��,�,.����
v..n...���
��,{7��r� ` �_ •�.�..�...�-� � •�� �iw�l
1 �' = � "�t,.i.l •
\ �
�� ' - �!� �.��,�r
= 1 � ���1!
� � - �� �:.�
�1� �:� �
�
:
���'''.'_
.' ' , ;�t�r�.nr.���.rt•' ��'.
'1�+I+1 ,N� � _ ;,,,�� !��.I ;,�� �� -
:. � �� -- � Y ��w
1� . ��
,�' �� '� 1�j'��1� � / '� �.�,+ -
� i. � ' � ' � � •�� -
p �
'r � — � ��
.�
.�! �t � � " ,'•�.•"�' _ . ... �� � 'i�
, ' � ��, N i„�•�� "�. s wr��• t
'�♦��� �'�• i�'��ir:� .s�' "�.e� ,.o.: .��!�:�
. �� � : � . .� . ;_
''.��� �a�►.a. i`�'' I��i�. '�.!.•i���,A�����
. M
_. , , ��. �._i'�1 �� �i"' •. L•p� '
'� ';�' = 1 ■��i i �..��� !/���i�i1 ,
� � ... ������–.-a. $:r.• �„� .—..�
�� � : � ...� �''�"' � .���I�:.. :
:�� :�� � ����'�:: I`_" ���t"'� ��.
r � - :_ l���- --.
.� .� �,�i ;�- �I�i ��3.: ��� ' �
� ► � �••�� ��f �
• i �
� �+r�� ' '+ '�� —
•� � � '��� � M�O�I� },! �� """"�"
i �����I t��.�I� �.;�� • , �"""
��'I� ;;'. ��i,� �
■ •� s .�"�=
�!� � ��!'..�, �.�..:.:.-
.�: .;. t�;,,"�� .--- •
..; �., �,��
,, ,;, � .
� j �i�.
�,�� , �� . ,
.!��� � . . � ', ,■■!■� � ' •
��'� I�Z� ���� � ��.�+_... ' � Iiil� ���� ��
� '��t .. - •�� I�r/ �.,�� ��'
,. - .�.. � `
� �
. �-
!'i M. �,1
� �; ' � ����i� `�� ��.A!�.
�;�, :,� l ■w��o:� . '��l�s.� ��
� �� ...�----
•; � ��■ .� ������.,.� � �
N 1 _ I•t_r�..� � ; r�
�. � �
t ; \ �:..,,�,,.�. �: ,��,� .
�s � M�. �.. �:'� � .Y.r�►� ���
i. i, ...�._ �......r.�.
.�' S'-,i�;�' ���.� �'■� — � ,
i +
�t y !� . �. � :
s ��� � ,
t.� ��� , � ���; � -.;:
'� ..:.��� �'�;"s "'�' . _ -
• ,�,;.,, ,,�: ��� .__ —�
� ��� �
.-� .
r.. .. ~ i�'���.. �,�� •�- -
•
f � � ' , �
t '
.. !�G� �X�/� ���W1-e.
�' 2�• �2 ... ��� w�t�C�P.�otio�;,�
_ _---- _
�
CSirv�,�i,-` ���5�� �_ .
� /.o-�-•�4. .2� /�� �! ,c�,r���� ,i��. ,� 1�.�.vs.��
6
�v't-?-r-✓ C.o��l .
V-..��'�=sC� Q�.c�ic..? Go't�u-e�t, �tir�r-s�Q.. �-e ,��a:.evc�
... � ��.��.z ��'-� � �,�,�.�C ���. �T�e ��
, ��
���- �c�-�.� ��-"`;'�' ` `� ���""".�, a�- m,. -c� �-�r' �/- -
i�e-r�.-e c�ovc�:ol-01..
-- l�.` Gcu-eG(. � -G,-Z`o- � /!/�- .c:�ic..'I Qis. �[.O�1e..f[;� '
o�/ //�� � - o / �
-_- � '��°`�` � • C%`� /�'�'�l .� �,
.. r/��/e`� `�,
� �� a"'�"'�"` ��"� �� �'
. �
� 3 , � , � , , . .
-5` '��>,� — �.e,s�-,d►�e.a( o�-st- i�. � . .�,. c.P.n,�. - N� a�-y,
C% S��U — ,c� .��,���,,._ %- � ' t ��.e,.��
�� /n��%� "��'�
—. .. °� -g�`� G�%�.� �.e� , �,� %�.�� o��.%d�(G�
0
.._ '9=/Z � 3 �12. . l�' X 32` O�� �c,� ���:.,��
... -�- .�=a�i-��-- G?�2. a�e... � 0
� /�
^ 17 � � iJ'b�w .5� �v-P�- iv�'.cawi ��f �/� ,
�i/yY'(� o'YL�c,�D
�y�
.�' �
� � �
� - �e ��,. ��� � �'� � ,��� -
�°�`"-i�� _
Q-�.-r� � ��.�.--I
� ,
- �..�-,� - C��� -� � ,� � �. � ���,
- (�D �r�u;w�c� o� �-..� — .�.` .a� �
�
— T� e�-°,��� ��,e. ,� �,- ,r;�.��;�.� . �� �
o,�.Ce c��s��,,� .�... �,�•�3'�...
L'�""'�'� / 1 w C 5• — � � -
� � T� � ��r
��C°� �:��!ti-u • �a�. ' ��� .��P _
�--� � U�� .�;- � � co� ��` ��.
���lic/Cq �'"/ /L�' /`�� /V't-�1// �J'fi1'��/l •
�
- 64.�.- ,,.-� � a�...�e.
K - d��-� ��?��� -�. �.- -u.�-e f�.P ;y .?,�e ti-c� G��.�.
, . SA���� ���
� — 7'�e �.�,. ���:�.�.� a�-e +�rrr� � �J,���, �-� C�.,�u-�
�a-?�*-- — �e ��G�a=� ���, ,,�t,�e��� ,�, ��P .���.
.,�'�a�Z� ��r°�z� ,� ,��c?Kee� .
����
- w� �.� `,�. _
- ��e ,►�-�.ew ce�u.:C� ,�. � �-� e�,.
�,��.. - C,�.;� .� ��.0. 7� ���� .� � ��z�
� -�� . ��L �-� c �z.�.-..2.
- w/ .z�'e �� 1,�..�` � . �� ,a� �.
��.-c�.,� . i� ,� � - �- � ���, �l� .�-�.
- ,�� c�.. a�=,-.�j� ;y�-�'.�.e,.x� .
K - .� -� ,� �. - � - �y��
��
,�'� � ���.
;;�
!
.1 �
� • �
Snowdon and Hopkins • Architects ��I..4�A , ,
`_,,��
201 Gore Creek Drive 303 476-2201
Vail, Colorado 81657
January 10, 1992
Mr. Mike Mollica
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
renartmer.t of Community Development
75 South Frontage noad
Vail, CO 81657
Mike:
I wanted to give you an update on the Golden Peak House
Redevelopment Project since our work session on 11/25/91 . I was
also hoping that these items could be briefly discussed with the PEC
at their 1/13/92 meeting. Clark Willingham and I want to keep you,
and the PEC, as informed as possible on this project so that
potential problems can be dealt with as soon as possible.
l . The proposed western ground floor entrance to "Los Amigos" will
be pulled back, so that there is no intrusion into view corridor
#2 .
2 . Clark Willingham has had several meetings with Vail Ass�ciates,
Inc. and the proposal to purchase the property within the
existing overhang easements, along the south and west property
boundaries, has been met with favorable response. Shoul.d tliis
purchase be worked out with Vail Associates, Inc . , this could
allow the Golden Peak House to pursue the re-zoning of that
�ar^el t� ��I and senara�e it from the conf]. i ct wi.t.h Trar,t F
zoning.
3 . We have had meetings with Ellie Caulkins and Howard Berkowitz
(Mill Creek Circle property owners ) , Dwight Bessmer and Mr.
Galv.in (Mill Creek Court owners ) , and their concerns for Tract E
and the building height are being taken into consideration as we
redevelop our plans .
4 . As discussed at the 11/25/91 PEC meeting, we are planni_ng on
dropping the roof pitches on the building to 3/12 wllich will
ai�ow us to lower the overall height af the buildir�g by three
feet on the eastern and two feet on the western roof element.s .
5 . In addition, the western roof mass ridge can be centered cvhich
will allow the lowering of that roof element on� additional
foot .
� �
� � ' � • �
Page 2
Mr. Mike Mollica
January 10, 1992
-�CS
/'
6 . Because of the concern �pressed at the 11/25/91 PEC meeting
over the center sectior�' height, we are stepping the building
back and dropping unitP3@� from the proposal to allow for
improved views of Riva Ridge. This also drops one accommodation
unit from the proposal ' s density and reduces some square
footage.
7 . The eastern roof mass (in addition to being lowered three feet)
is also being pulled back from the eastern edge of the building
five feet to reduce the impact of the expansion on the east. In
a 7��;.,_l.^;? �}:�g c,�i l l ��� ln:": t-�__ {-`in _,;�`i'.:�;.'.^.±iCl"i C•� a �...._ ..'"I f�i?nr
roof element on the east elevation, greatly redu�ing the mass of
the eastern elevation.
8 . The new design will incorporate the enclosure of the eastern
stair and the extension of that stair to the fourth floor; to
resolve concerns expressed by Gary Murrain about meeting updated
UBC standards .
9 . In order to scale back the fifth floor residence, we are
expanding the proposal more to the south (within existing
property lines and easement areas ) where the view impacts are
less critical .
I hope this is a step in the right direction, and that staff and PEC
can have the opportunity to continue and fine tune the proposal
prior to a more formal review later in the month. If you have any
questions, please call .
Sincerely,
Craig N. Snowdon, AIA
Partner
SNOWDON AND HOPKINS - ARCHITECTS
CNS/slh
cc: Clark Willingham
East Village Homeowners Association
� oadao�o� � � dn
L�/.LI I. a�U
'�°a "°"`"° l3QOW3li 3Sf10H �d3d N3alOJ Le�. .w.,��
�„�,....��.�.«�
� .��._��
� \
/ �
�� �
.� -��. O
�.. _ ---�
_-- �; �
, �
��-- ,
, �
� � ' � �
g
� �
_ �
�
� � .' . - � �
_� � �� �Qo`.
E /..
� � �
��
3
f
a �
e
\��
� � �
�
�
� � a :
� � �
� � a
�' . �/ �
� J o
�
�
0
° � - � o
� �--------
�
s
o \
\
\
..\
/
/
— oadao�o� ° �. n
zr�.L�� '�'�
�°� `°"°� �3aOW3a 3Sf10H �d3d N3a�0� Le . -��
.�,,..,,��.�
i�� U� �p
\ ��
j � • �
6 �
0
� �
/ � �
� \ L�?J �
�
� * �
�
!
t
•
'�� � � .i� • �
� � �
♦ .
`\�� � �� t
��� \ � _ i
� � I I
�`� - �' � i
� �
� i
� � � i
�� ` � i
i � � • i
� � ;
--�
� -
�
� ----.�-- ' ---_-- �
� �
� ,y
� ,,
�y,� ,,,
�
�-
� oavaoio� � --�n
y�/Fa/I �
��° `�°�� 13a0W3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ Lo�- -��
.�..��.�
�
. ,, �
4 �
0
/ � �
'� a �
e � �
; �- 6
\ A e \\'♦ .':l`� � 25
� �p.},
♦ �H �
� � � / �
i,
/ � � �
� •
�
� `�� ♦
\ ��
�
�� � � �
� �
�•
�
�
�\` ` )�' ��
� • •.�
1•
I
Iy
1 w ^� t
/ \ �
I ■ �
, �
\ "—_J4__ __
� �:� '--- � _�
� ---�i
� � //
�y�\�////
``"' OadaOlO� "'IIbA
su wm.flw L�r�YL/I �O
�'°s '""'°`°'� 13a0W3li 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ z>�r .w..,�
m.�.,,...,�a.�
\
` � p
� �� e
\
\ �
,� \ o
/ � a �
.
� :�. 'ae
� � � �
/ ` • \ E�
/ � \
* � 6
\ / % � �
_�,
- � '�� � � � �
{�� �gv � �' � I
�
\\\ a � � I
\� � � �
• Y
� � O 0 � .
_ � o �
3
\ � �� �
, �
1 .
I .
� � �� I
I � C� '� �'
� , � �
I � � •
\ �
�
� ----- ---�----- —
.
�
\ �
�
� ��
�' �
��
��
�"" Oadli0�0� ��It/A
LriELi i .b
t'�°� "°"°�� �3a0W3li 3SIlOH �V3d N3alOJ Z>,,. .w..,�
�.�,..,,��.�
��
�� Q
/ .. \� � �
� � o
/ \ \ � �
�
_ .
Y� � � �
/ ... \` \ � o
\� � 0 8'
x? \ � g
\ ' � � � �
� � � a
� �
� : r� �
� s� � i. I
� . I
\�� � i
�� �� � — I
�� — I
� • � i
�� I
\ ._ '� �
L� e�
I
I
I
I
' �•w�' I` I
� - - �+
\
\� //
� //�
�/�Y/
Oad!101O� ... �IdA
�.0 .....��. i�/Fa/I .ra
'�'"° "°"°�°" �3QOW3li 3St10H �d3d N34lOJ Le,,, .a..,�
.�..,,�,�.�
�
/� �.. �� � �
s
\ � �
"s` e°s g
�-t! \\ � �
o \ �' �
A O L
\ � � \\ � �
_y
<^ -�
, � T± g� �
� �
. I
.
�
. ° o I
�\
\ \ �
� a
\ o (
.I I
� I
� `"
s� 1�,:"
i�� �
\ d\;'.',•�. ��l i I
.�\��\�\\ '.; ,:.. I I
,� �'.,��� ' Q I
� �',.\`�����\� s i I
1 \�'' i I �
I� I
g I I
o �
I �
� �� I
1 �
�� �,.
� � �-
� �
�,' �.��
�
"" Oad!101O� w�IdA
� y�/Fa/I +�
'�" "'°"°"� 1300W3a 3Sf10H �V3d N3alOJ L.�,. .a.w�
a+..w�,..�w•�•�s
\
,.� �� �L�
,,�" � �v m" �
, �
, �
� ; \ g �
� �
� / � �
\ a
�'
.. � �1 j � � �
\\ � �g
\ �.' ✓ 9 � \ � �
� / (
'�� 3 J 4 �
� I\ '
�
\ -� o -� �
�� � � I
�� ,, . � (
� �
'� y, ' I
\ \�Y/1`� 7 _J
\ � ; I
� ' --- I
r_____1
1, � �
� �:
�
l � I
� , --� I
�
/ 1 ; I
l � � I
1 � ,
_� 1
�\ L-------�--j.--->�;
� �-
��, ,,
,
��
""�' OOt/a010� — IIdA
s�iF�i i .�a
'�°° "°"'�� 13a0W3a 3S(lOH �d3d N3a�OJ Ls,,. .w.»,.�
.�..�,..��.�.«�
\
� a .
� Q° = s
�
p ., $
/ ' � �
> � �
,' . �
� �i ���\\ 6 �
\ � b
/ ``` � �' C�'
,-
,�" � � �
,; . � �
,..
.
�� .
� -=�
< ,
. , i
�� V � �
� � �. ; �
� \ �� ' --~ I
\ � ,� �
� � %� ' I
.y / I
� \ � I
� � ��, +
` � I���i `� � 1
/
♦y� � , -� I
\\ � I ' I
1 ' � I
1 i----- - I
I I
�� � i:
I � �
� � I�
J I __? I
� ' � I
f� � �
I �
' ' I
,
1 .
------ -----
\ L'___ ____1
� ��i
� /�/
� � /
v �,�
� PUBLIC NOTICE �
r.r► �
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on January 27. 1992 at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1, A request for a setback variance and conditional use permit to allow a tow which will
transport people and supplies from the garage to the house at 2701 Davos Trail/Lot
15, Block B. Vail Ridge.
Applicant: Brian and Sonja Craythome
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
��� 2. A work session on the redevelopment status of the exterior alteration request for the
Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First
Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. �
Planner: Mike Mollica
3. Any items tabled from the January 13, 1992 Planning and Environmental Commission
meeting. �
Information on the listed items is available at the Community Development office in the Vail
Municipal Building during regular office hours.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on January 10, 1992.
' �c'.r�-�c.U`� ,�
-�--��^u✓� ��,�tit /1.'Y;<<./.; ,�,r i� ,"�
i'�� U � U
�
(� J
��� � -� l� � .
. • �
l �3 �z pE� x
7. An update on the redevelopment status of the exterior alteration request for the
Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail Viilage
First Filing.
Appiicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail
Associates, inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Clark Willingham, appiicant, gave an update on the status of the Golden Peak House project.
He felt a rezoning would be possible. There had been many good meetings with other
adjacent property owners, the covenants were solvable, the height on the east end and west
end had been lowered 3 feet. The center section had been pulled back to reveai 15 more
visible feet of Riva Ridge ski run from Bridge Street. With regard to the view corridor, the
entrance to Los Amigos had been moved back to the east, and it would be out of the view
corridor.
Mr. Willingham had incorporated all the changes the Fire Department had requested. He had
a meeting with Greta Parks (owner of the Cyrano Building to the east) and suggested plans to
redevelop the Cyrano Building at the same time.
In two weeks the project architect, Craig Snowdon, would be back to the PEC with specific
drawings. Mr. Willingham was pleased with the support of the neighbors. He had put poles
and tape on the roof of the Golden Peak House, which were still in place, to identify the
proposed roof structure.
Craig Snowdon, project architect, explained Unit #405 had been removed from the 4th floor.
He showed snapshots of the roof staking.
Diana expressed gratitude for the constructive input and the working with the neighbors.
8. A request to allow a change to an approved development plan, Tracts A and B, a
part of Parcel A, Lions Ridge Filing No. 2, commonly referred to as The Valley,
Phase II.
Applicant: Crossview at VaEI Properties, Inc./Steve Gensler
Planners: Andy Knudtsen/Kristan Pritz
TABLED TO JANUARY 27, 1992
9. A request for a setback variance and conditional use permit to allow a tow which
will transport people and supplies from the garage to the house at 2701 Davos
Trail/Lot 15, Block B, Vail Ridge. �
Applicant: Brian and Sonja Craythorne �
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
TABLED TO JANUARY 27, 1992
Kathy moved and Chuck seconded to table items 5, 8 and 9 until January 27, 1992. The �
11
I
i
�
' . , PUBLIC IvOTICc �
. `
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVE�that the Planning and Environmental Ca;;�mission of the Town of
Vail will hold a pubiic hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on January 27. 1992 at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1, A request for a setback variance and conditional use permit to allow a tow which will
transport people and supplies from the garage to the house at 2701 Davos Trail/Lot
15. Block B� Vail Ridge.
Applicant: Brian and Sonja Craythome
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
�- 2. A work session on the redevelopment status of the exterior alteration request for the
Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B� Block 2. Vail Village Fi�st
Filing.
� Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssoaationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. �
Planner: Mike Mollica
3. Any items tabled from the January 13, 1992 Planning and Environmental Commission
meeting. �
Information on the listed items is available at the Community Development office in the Vail
Municipal Building during regular office hours.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on January 10, 1992.
�-��^J,,� .��.tit /1,�Y;�/., �,��-��� �,-�r�-�.c/� `..����,�1
;%% U � J
�l °
�-�. ; - },1,i :
�
n 'l � G�
1 ' �,.t.� _. _ . — �-
��� .� �,y��,'�:�; ���
. �,D���. (� ,�- ,
-�:" ��.�_-���.;� �.���J-� � ` � ���' � '
� "� � � �..
�' -
. .. ; �e -,� -�''�
' �-_ . ��.e,�;,���.:� . - : :: : � _.
�..� ,,� a.� �.
�� ��.=���� � � . � �
,� ��_...,/ �
. ' �I�� C�yJ%� � �! ��ry..._f T �-1:-.,. '
� // �.� r.�c
�� , 1 ���..�
!�'P'(,.�°'�I. -� y �
a'�'} � L ;�:� ,. ; _ `-� _.
� �,T �
� � ��_ �,R�. �� G'� �,. ?- ��� ���-e.�a�� �� .-� �.�.
�
� �
�
� , r
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT: �.rCs�._ �� �c��
DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING � •Z-9� 9�
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: !0• /2• 9 /
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
���v� /9�E'�,'�e� /Q.e:.�E.�e:,^�.�
i
PUBLIC WORKS
Reviewed by: Date:
Comments:
IRE DEPARTM �' _ J` � �
Reviewed b • ��.� ��,�� Date:
� �� ; ��� ���ii,/;� � �� , (�-^�� ��'�'*-�
/� ��o%' %��r;i,;;,,.: �.
,, � �� 5" " " G�-�?.
Z> ��-c � p. Zt� � /��?-�1_�/�� Za .a c��,
��� J l� 'i� /=i/'�r Go�s.- /�-�/i 6-�-�
3 1 ,dL� !.✓�G L n.���`-� � � �-��7n�scJ,
, � �� ��2,.,,,�,�t�n,a- c��-L
,�s.r�/�r'� /Z'--¢
.�I S.�*�, p 5 W ce�.►.,,� dd ��G "/ � o►- �E' � .
� � �'�''�` . ,�,�, /G' ,��.� a,...l
.��y�,�.l
,,.�t` o K m. ,w�-�` ,o.�oCe. P�
1-4 ' ,c„�.C�. T,� ,y ��' �'� F-wc �-y"2`• '� a,�—Gi- �•=�. ��.•-•
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by: Date:
Comments:
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by: Date:
Comments:
revised 3/11/91
It�J TE�' — GEP,4R7k4 Ehd T.�.L REtir'IE�'
�"I�LC�EhJ F'E,�.H:: H��rl1;E
P R CiJEt�T: '
D�.lE t�l1BA�l-fTEC}:
s:;i�h�t�lEtdT`� hJEEL'�EU B'Y: _
Bf?IE� C�ES�vPIPTlr�td ��SF THE PRi�P���S,�.L:
Er{:TEF'.1�:=�F' .�,LTEF'hT1�:=rFJ — �'EC�E'��EL��Pf�4EhJT
�'l1�LIC k4'C��:N�:S �IN:E BF�r�N.E ���T/_
f=;�viewed b�� Ca��te: �l� � ��— /
���rnrr��nts::
1} F'R(3P{��ED P�'�ER`� ua1THIPd .�t�'�' GRI�`E �.�:E�. rdEEDS T�� BE CiE'�IC,tdEC� T��
��L�PF'URT HE„1�'r` TR�JC:K: U�,�.C��:.
�.� 'A'E '�1+ILL tdEED .A. lWEhdTY—FI'��'E (�.5�) Ft)��T EA,SEk+1EhdT F��IP, THE EIk;E F'�TH
�.tdC� PR��POSEC� ST�JRA+1 �E�fEF' Ii,1PR�ti1�'EMEt�1T5 `sH�:���tA! IPJ TNE ti�`hIL '��TFIEETSGk.PE
GRMIha.�GE F'Lxha_
.'�) k4�:S. HILL >HC��JLD BE tJC��TIFIEC� C�F Et���;R��a.�H1�4EPJT5 E:x:ISTlttlt� ��h� HER PR�aPE�7'r
�'.fdC> THE PRLIPI�:�ED Erdr=;f:I�.�.GHMdEt�lTS. �nz 5:�•� o�� n� -I'��.
�) ����NidER �r1LL �aEEC� Tr� ,�,{6?�_!I�'E �. PE'ti+�C�,�.ELE E�,t�E�1ErJT F�7P I�IPRi��vEt�4ENT��
��` ��, �1 TH IhJ TH E T��rWt�d ��F '�r;�l L �:—0—'ti��.
/�, J�('t �i.L�L��.�.ir��'Stxr=�'�4���5E—`iF'���E}'�#�'�i�I��TIT7T'ZT'���•,.1���1,{�TLIC L i�4 IkITI-!.1 r.R1.+'�r �..'r'
��; UVLL
\ �` �� . . . rt._ _�� . .. � .i . _ �3 . _ T.`_3.
1� ;:"� � � � . . . . ` . . ._. . . . T,`
��`�i� ti < < . .. � ,. � � .
��') ,4PJ ,�.G�:EEMEr�JT '��iTH LITILIT'f` ��C�k�iF�nNIES TCi A.LLs=�'1�r THEI�1 Ti� EI�ILC� Vti�THlhd fi..tJ
E:KI�Tlhd�� E,i+.�Ek4Er�dT_ '3PE��IFI��:.fiLL4` THE E'{:ISTIhd[� �E'tiVER LIhJE_
�:�1 .4LL �URF�.GE C�R�1rJ„i:�E Cird THE '���UTHERL`�` �tLJU 'h'E:�IEF?L'Y SIC�E'_=� OF lNE
E�UILL:�I�di� SH���JLC) BE C>IF'E{�=TED IhdT��� .�. P�E�V UttJC1EF4�3P,i�4.�t�lC? ST����'t,i SEY�ER
S�'rSTEt►� TN,�T CC�ULC� BE TIED II�JTn ,�.�J Ex:lallr�JG S'�'STEk4 L��r:�.TEC� Ot�J THE
���GIJTH'1�'E:�TE�'L'Y �IC�E CyF 7HE HILL BUILC}IPd��'. THE TU4�'t� �,�:�hJT:� TQ F'�'EtiiEhJT
,�,t�J�'�' �L��RF�CE C�F'�I�J,^�GE FP?�A� THE ������7t-1EPL'r` �:ICiE ���F THE E���ILC�I�d�� FRC�fvi
EhdTERIFJG OhJTC� �THE F'Lr�,1,�'. r^•.�,E�4 �4hJC� GOhJ`�EG�UE�JTL'�` C}�:J�1t+l -G'F:IU��E STREET.
9) P,i���F DR.AINS SHC_IULCi hJOT Eh�PT'Y' ��h•JTC� THE `�TREET 8t)T �.:d-i���llLC� E:E DIP,Ei�TEG
ItJTO THE h!E'� �T���R�A SE1�EF? F'E�}LIIRED t�hJ THE SUUTHERL''� �IDE UF lNE
E;tJ ILL:�I h•1��-
Fl RE D EP',�.�'TMEt�lT
P�view�d b�s� _ C,c�t�;
±'���C51 fTlc?(1 t5:
- � � �
: �� � �
�
... � �' rn
� � �
� �
Q � �
• >
C � o
,r �, z
Y d
= U
C � �
�
���\ O � �
�``` � 'p Q
� G7
� r,. -
1 � �
�
� �
/ �
! �
�
�
�
� T
` �
, ` ` a o
_ - o
� �
i �
� O
. � U.
! �
� � w
1 >
_ " l�
�s
, a
� �
•� -r... � .... — -- ._ .._J s
,e�Q --�c1
�
�
��
�
��
m �
�
w ' � • � � �
� � � ��: �
� � � �
� �
�
1 � M �
I ' '
� .. . � °
� � � �
���'^yr 1 Y �
, � � � �
. . � b �>
� . � � � �
. �. �` � .�
. . _ . � � ,�� � :
� -
� �� ,, LXl �l ►, � �? � _j
,...y��r i — o�olc�4n�k hwn�
. � � . . i �
� .. i ►
� �
� �
� r �� r
` ��-� �jo�c�� peak h�cns� �
l 1
, � . I
�
A f
. } '
' � �
� r
:� r
: � ` I
. _ ,,: ;..�~,''�"�• ` j
_� - +-
�� � �
G
VIEW COF� RIDOR 2
��
. � . ` ' . � � �
, '
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 25, 1991
SUBJECT: A request for the establishment of a 90-day review period for a Commercial
Core I exterior alteration request, and a request for a worksession for the
establishment of a Special Development District and a request for revisions to
View Corridor Nos. 1 and 2, for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch
Road/Lots A and 6, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
���';<::::>::::>:;<:>�::;::::>:><::::«:::::�::�:::>::�:r:::::>::<::::;:::>:::::>>::>::::«:r:::;;
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUESTS
The intent of this worksession is to initiate discussions between the Planning and
Environmental Commission, the staff and the applicants with regard to the redevelopment of
the Golden Peak House. The staff considers this review to be very preliminary in nature and
this worksession is intended to provide direction and guidance to the applicants early in the
development process. It should be noted that, since this is a preliminary worksession, the
specific direction provided by the Planning and Environmental Commission with regard to the
proposed redevelopment plan, as well as the proposed planning process, will be very valuable
to the applicant and the staff in further directing the project.
The Community Development Department has received the following applications concerning
the redevelopment of the Golden Peak House:
1. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District for the
Golden Peak House property.
2. An exterior alteration request, for the Commercial Core I Zone District, for the
Golden Peak House.
In order for the PEC to review the redevelopment plan as proposed, the staff would anticipate
the following additional applications:
1. A request to amend View Corridor No. 1.
2. A request to amend View Corridor No. 2.
1
�rwr�
� � � � � . . .
. �
3. A request for a rezoning, for a portion of Tract E (the area immediately south of -
the Golden Peak House), from Agricultural and Open Space to Commercial
Core I.
4. A request for a minor subdivision to incorporate the rezoned Tract E parcel into
the Golden Peak House parcel.
The Golden Peak House was constructed in 1966, and since that time, there have been only
minor, cosmetic modifications made to the exterior of the structure. Generally, this proposed
redevelopment for the Golden Peak House includes a renovation of the entire building. The
architectural modifications include a sloped roof, the addition of dormers, balconies, bay
windows, and other architectural projections. Such modifications include the addition of a
fourth floor (on the western end of the structure) and the addition of a fifth floor (on the
eastern end). The existing "butterfly" roof form would be removed, and a gable roof added.
The proposed gable roof would have a 4:12 pitch with shake shingles.
Modifications proposed for the exterior of the structure will also facilitate the improvement, and ,
more efficient use, of the interior spaces. The existing center area of the building, commonly
called an arcade, is not a very efficient use of the interior spaces. With the redevelopment,
the applicant is proposing to remove this entire arcade area and to add a full basement
beneath the structure. The common areas of the building would be better defined to allow for
a more efficient pedestrian circulation system throughout the structure. Additional retail
commercial space would be added to the building. Specifically, at-grade retail shops are
proposed along the west elevation.
There are currently 18 dwelling units (and 0 accommodation units) located in the building.
The redevelopment proposal calls for a total of 16 dwelling units (8 with lock-off potential) and
6 accommodation units.
The entire structure woutd be brought into compliance with the current Building and Fire
codes, and the building would be sprinkled.
General site improvements, around the perimeter of the Golden Peak House, would include
the following:
1. A concrete unit paver walkway would be added along the northern and western
sides of the structure.
2. The applicant has agreed to modify the Seibert Circle area, and to bring the
circle into conformance with the recommendations of the recently adopted
Streetscape Master Plan.
2
' .a� � • •
3. The applicant is willing to discuss possible improvements to the pedestrian
walkway between Seibert Circle and the Vista Bahn base area. Such
improvements could include the addition of landscaping, drainage modifications
and the addition of concrete unit pavers. Cooperation from adjacent property
owners would be necessary.
4. The applicant is proposing to construct an outdoor dining deck on the south
side of the Golden Peak House, a portion of which is located upon Tract E.
Additionally, the Los Amigos Restaurant is proposing a greenhouse enclosure
which would also extend partially upon Tract E. Further discussion of the
issues regarding Tract E follows in Section VI of this memorandum.
5. The existing trash enclosures, currently located along the west elevation of the
building, would be relocated into the basement of the Golden Peak House. A
trash compactor would compress the refuse and an elevator would transport it
up to the first floor when trash pick-ups are scheduled. This would occur at the
northeast corner of the building.
6. It is proposed that the five existing evergreens, located along the west elevation
of the building, be relocated south of the building, to Tract E.
3
.n `
� � `' • ' -
il. GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ZONING ANALYSIS
The projecYs departures from the CCI zone district standards are highlighted in bold type.
UNDERLYING ZONING: EXISTING PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL CORE I PROJECT SDD'
Site Area: 0.159 acres or Same Same
6,926 sq.ft.
Setbacks: Per the Vail Village N: 0-6 ft. N: 0-3 ft.
Urban Design Guide Plan W: 0-7 ft. W: 0.5 ft.
S: 0-8 ft. S: 0-6 ft.
E: 0.5-1.5 ft. E: 0.5-1.5 ft.
Helght: 60%: 33 ft. or less East: 46 ft. max. East: 56 ft.max.
40%: 33 ft. - 43 ft. West: 36 ft. max. West: 44 ft.max.
Common Area: 1,939 sq.ft or 6,570 sq.ft. or 118% 6,012 sq. ft. or 108%
` 35%of allowable GRFA -1,939 sq. ft. or 35% - 1,939 sq. ft.or 35%
, 4,631 sq. ft. added to GRFA 4,073 sq.R.-added to GRFA
GRFA: 5,541 sq.ft. or 80% 8,958 sq.ft. 17,687 sq. ft.
+ 4,631 sq. ft. (excess common) +4,073 sq.ft. (excess common area)
13,589 sq. ft. or 196% 21,760 sq.ft.or 315°�
-Units: 25 units per acre, or 18 units 19 units
3.9 units for the site. (16 DU and 6 AU)
Site Coverage:*' 5,541 sq.ft. 6,351 sq.ft. 7,721 sq.ft.
or 80% or 92% or 112°�
Landscaping: Per the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan
Parking: Per Town of Vail Required: 56 Required:76
parking standards
Loading: Per Town of Vail Required: 1 Required: 2
loading standards Existing: 0 Proposed: 0
Commercial Uses: N/A 7,157 sq.ft 11,795 sq. ft.
Gross Floor Area: N/A 23,241 sq. ft. 35,494 sq. ft.
' All the proposed development statistics shall be verified by staff prior to final review by the PEC.
** Site Coverage calculations include areas of the building which extend beyond the boundaries of the
Golden Peak House property.
4
s
� � • � •
, •
�
III. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the purpose of Special Development Districts is to:
"The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and
creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate
use; to improve the design character and quality of new development within the
town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities;
to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further
the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
An approved development plan for a special development district, in conjunction
with a property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for
guiding development and uses of property included in the special development
district."
Although the staff will not specifically address each of the nine SDD review criteria for this
worksession, the criteria are listed below.
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent propertles relative to archltectural design,
scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, ldentity, character, vlsual
integrity and orlentation.
B. Uses, activity and denslty which provlde a compatible, efficlent and
workable relatlonship with surrounding uses and activity.
C. Compllance wlth parking and loading requfrements as outlined In Chapter
18.52.
D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan,
Town policies and Urban Design Plans.
E. Identiflcation and mitigation of natural and/or geologlc hazards that affect
the property on which the special development district Is proposed.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive
to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehlcles and pedestrians
addressing on and off-site traffic clrculation.
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space In order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, vlews and functions.
5
� �
� � • • ' _
�
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
Additionally, the nine criteria for Commercial Core I exterior alterations shall also be used to
judge the merits of this project. The nine criteria are listed below and a further explanation of
the criteria is found in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan.
A. Pedestrlanizatlon
B. Vehlcular Penetration
C. Streetscape Framework
D. Street Enclosure
E. Street Edge
F. Building Height
G. Views and Focal Points
H. Service and Delivery
I. Sun/Shade
IV. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN
The Vail Village Master Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak House, as indicated in
Sub-Area Concepts 3-2 and 3-3. Said concepts read as follows:
"#3-2 Golden Peak House
Due to this building's gross inconsistency with the Urban Design Guide Plan
and neighboring buildings, it is identified as a primary renovation site.
Relationship to greenspace on south, Seibert Circle on north, as well as to
mountain entryway, are important considerations. Loading and delivery must
be addressed."
6
� �
• � �
"� �. , ,—�,� � ,� ,��- �� _
. / _ ����j����'+�`��
� �'�
' IIED 110M �� Y� .
�� y MRISTIAMIA �
�UU
�lca. l; » `�.r-
..._::. � ir i•
� � �..
v��H
� �,«.�oo�i��3 2� '�-�_.
E YAF � O LDEN}!AR N�! � •
�J � ♦
'LACE �' . �.
__ ��.��� ,
�_. � ��� _
-- �'� � � =�
"#3-3 Seibert Circie Studv Area
Study area to establish a more inviting public plaza with greenspace, improved
sun exposure and a focal point at the top of Bridge Street. Design and extent
of new plaza to be sensitive to fire access and circulation considerations."
- .�o�.i`=;-., -- � .
E�EO ��-{ � '
j., �� �
IDOE w cUeE�/ `,''�� : .
.DO. L �1.D0. ( Z^.��`_:•./.. �.•.�;^i
�.�
- � �.�OCK . YAII 70NMNOVlE!
m
�atHO q eoa r �....I �J���.�(11_•
M�HAN . �e � . ..
��, I ��'��
.
_-- �
^ I ;� '_M1Ll M[E� • 1
�� �1lIOUOP \\ C�RT lLDi�. • �I`
tORE�LD ��[) �
s�oa. �� � �y .
.i , ' �_� .� ���
\U ...ii � :.
.�--�
. l/ � \ //' �/h�
� �'
�ED LroM MqISiIAM
��'� �< �
! �''.' PL�Z/� '�\ � .
eiou. � �::::.. •
!i I? c::....._• � �
(� ') �R , :.;: .
� , r��w�-�:
1 //��� '~
S i ��'•,/ � �� ,
Nlll�100.\ / �'� .
-�, C` ..ti. , ,��• .
ONE VAII � � �'LOEM►!`R N/O� , / `\` .
.\.
PLAC£ �,.� � �., ��\�.
�i{�"�
, \ � � . �' �
Additionally, the staff believes the following goals and objectives, as stated in the Vail Village
Master Plan, are relevant to this proposal:
Goal #1 - Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and identity.
1.2 Objective:
Encourage the upgrading and redeve�opment of residential and commercial
facilities.
7
.... �
� � '
�-
1.3 Objectfve:
Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements
done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town.
2.2 ObJective:
Recognize the "historic" commercial core as the main activity center of the
Village.
2.2.1 Policy:
The design criteria in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
shall be the primary guiding document to preserve the existing
architectural scale and character of the core area of Vail Village.
2.3 Objective:
Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight
accommodations.
2.3.1 Policy:
The development of short term accommodation units is strongly
encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing
density levels are required to be designed or managed in a
manner that makes them available for short term overnight
rental.
2.4 Objective:
Encourage the development of a variety of a new commercial activity where
compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policy:
Commercial infill development consistent with established
horizontal zoning regulations shall be encouraged to provide
activity generators, accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and
streetscape improvements to the pedestrian network throughout
the Village.
2.5 Objective:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing
lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
2.6 Objective:
Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of
the private sector.
2.6.1 Policy:
Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or
redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by
existing zoning.
8
� -...
f � �
. :,
2.6.2 Policy:
Empioyee housing shail be developed with appropriate
restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the
local work force.
3.1 ObJective:
Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other
improvements.
3.1.1 Policy:
Private development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping, lighting
and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
3.4.2 Policy:
Private development projects shatl be required to incorporate
new sidewalks along streets adjacent to the project as
designated by the Vail Village Master Plan and/or Recreation
Trails Master Plan.
4.1.3 Pollcy:
With the exception of ski base-related facilities, existing natural
open space areas at the base of Vail Mountain and throughout
Vail Village shall be preserved as open space.
The Vail Village Conceptual Building Height Plan has included the Golden Peak House
in the 3-4 story category. A building story is defined as 9 feet of height (no roof
included).
V. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan specifically addresses the Golden Peak
House, as indicated in Sub-Area Concepts 9 and 10. Said concepts read as follows:
Concept 9 - "Commercial expansion (ground floor) not to exceed 10 feet in depth, possible
arcade. To improve pedestrian scale at base of tall building, and for greater
transparency as an activiry generator on Seibert Circle.
Concept 10 - Seibert Circle. Feature area paving treatment. Relocate focal point (potential
fountain) to north for better sun exposure (fall/spring), creates increased plaza
area and are the backdrop for activities. Separated path on north sides for
unimpeded pedestrian route during delivery periods."
9
� �
�� �:� �
f.-"� � r� � �' _
, � '" y �;2
� .1,. ,..� " .
14 t •. �` ' �
1' �
_ i% " . s� ' `
i' / .� � .
��� �
. � ' � •
�� :
l f:�� 1 �=: •� \
� 8'
_•' �.r ^\: � ,
�J � �� �. '4
� r ���. ..��� �.`l
.�;; �
� �.. . .,`.`, •
��f'l . k> . `tt t�
:.;SJ3cR CLE•!- •
.� ``
•`���•�.���:��. 9 •
� ���' �`� :1
, .:� - - .. . . � �—
, �
��..a.)
� ��" r
�^...�
��
VI. DISCUSSION iSSUES
Since this is a worksession, there is no staff recommendation at this time. However, the staff
has identified the following issues, in addition to the review criteria listed in Section III of this
memorandum, which we would like to discuss further with the PEC:
1. Proposed modifications to View Corridor No. 1.
2. Proposed modifications to View Corridor No. 2.
3. The project's departures from the Commercial Core I Zone District standards,
which are as follows:
a. Building height �
b. GRFA
c. Common area
d. Dwelling unit count
e. Site coverage
f. Loading berths
4. The Tract E issue. The applicant has discussed the possibiliry of requesting a
zone change amendment for a portion of Tract E, which is currently zoned
Agricultural and Open Space. The area in question would be similar in size
and shape, as the existing area, which is labeled as Easement #1 and
Easement #2 on the attached survey. Vail Associates is the owner of Tract E,
and has granted easements to the Golden Peak House to allow for certain
encroachments, such as roof overhangs and balconies, in the area of
Easement Nos. 1 and 2. These encroachments are considered legal, non-
conforming uses within the Agricultural and Open Space Zone District, and as
10
.. --.�
� � � •
, .
such, all legal, non-conforming uses cannot be enlarged or expanded, and if
modified, they must be brought into full compliance with the zoning code.
Tract E is zoned Agricultural and Open Space, and the allowable and
conditional uses of that zone district do not allow for "commercial-type" uses.
In order to accommodate the applicant's proposed restaurant greenhouse
enclosure and outdoor dining deck, the applicant would first need to amend the
zone district from Agricultural and Open Space, to a zone district which allows
for such commercial uses. The Town's Land Use Plan has designated Tract E
as "Vail Village Master Plan", which esentially refers to the Vail Village Master
Plan for land uses designations in this district. The Village Master Plan
designation for Tract E is "Ski Base/Recreation", which reads as follows:
"Located at the base of Vail Mountain in the Golden Peak area and
immediately adjacent to Vail Village, this designation is intended to
provide for facilities and services inherent in the operation of a ski area:
ski trails, lifts, base facilities, public restrooms and ticket sales."
The applicant has also considered the option of imposing Commercial Core I
zoning on this portion of Tract E, as well as requesting a minor subdivision so
that the rezoned portions of Tract E could be included in the Golden Peak
House property.
To further complicate this issue, there are existing protective covenants in place
for Tract E which would conflict with the development plan the applicant is
proposing. The staff would recommend that the protective covenants be
modified to allow for such uses prior to the Town entertaining a request to
modify the zone district.
c:�pec�rnemos�goldpeak.N25
11
...._- .�
� � .
. �
EXHIBIT "A" �-
Golden Peak House
Square Footaqe Analvsis
Existing Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA Office
Basement Level: 1,932 2,364 0 96
First Floor: 3,924 1,276 0 292
Second Floor: 1,301 1,332 2,466 168
Third Floor: 0 1,480 3,749 0
Fourth Floor: 0 118 2,743 0 �
Totals: 7,157 6,570 8,958 556
Total square footage (gross area) = 23,241 sq. ft.
Proposed Conditions
Commercial Common GRFA
Basement Level: 3,770 2,315 0
First Floor: 5,425 748 0
Second Floor: 2,600 1,304 2,648
Third Floor: 0 840 5,643
Fourth Floor: 0 590 5,711
Fifth Floor: 0 215 3,685
Totals: 11,795 6,012 17,687
Total square footage (gross area) = 35,494 sq. ft.
12
.. , � �
� • r • • �
. ' '
� Exhibit "B"
Golden Peak House
Dwellinq Unit Analysis
Existin :
DU AU
Basement Level: 0 0
First Fioor: 0 0
Second Fioor: 8 0
Third Floor: 8 0
Fourth Floor: 2 0
Totals: 18 0 = 18 DUs
Proposed:
DU AU
Basement Level 0 0
First Floor: 0 0
Second Floor: 4 0
Third Floor: 7 2
Fourth Floor: 4 4
Fifth Floor: 1 0
Totals: 16 6/2 = 3 = 19 DUs
Note: 2 AUs = 1 DU
13
, _ . . _�
� � . '
L .
. , �
.�`,
EXHIBIT "C" '
Golden Peak House
Parkinq/Loadinq Analysis
Existing Conditions - Required
Parkinq Spaces Loadinq Berths
Retail Commercial 23.8 1
Residential 30.0 0
Office 2.2 0
TOTALS: 56.0 1 .
Proposed Conditions - Required
Parkinq Spaces Loadinq Berths
Retail Commercial 39.3 2
Residential 36.5 0
TOTALS: 75.8 2
14
, � �i
� ��
��� _ (�e (r '�-- S � (
,
• � , , rc �� � � x� �_,
I. The appiicant shall provide a temporary wood booth/structure instead of the metal trailer.
2. Signing must meet the allowable signing under the code. Based on the sign code, the
business was limited to one sign with a size not to exceed 20 square feet.
3. All materials (fencing, lights, structure) shall be removed from the site by December 27,
1991.
The applicant, Richard Matthews, explained that the banner sign reading "Christmas Trees"
would be on the trailer. Richard showed the two smaller signs that he would like to use. He
did not want to build a wood building because of the time it would take to construct the
building. While waiting to construct a building, the salesman at the tree lot would have no
place to keep warm.
The board agreed to accept the metal building. Ludwig felt the signs should be within the sign �
code. Chuck agreed with him. Gena felt that aesthetically, the signs were fine. Diana felt '
that the board should visit the site 5efore Christmas when the business was operating in order
to make a determination as to how long the conditional use permit would be approved for.
Kathy suggested the conditional use permit be reviewed in January. She further baelieved the
permit should be reviewed and approved on an annual basis. Chuck felt that the conditional
use should be allowed to continue until there was a problem with it.
Chuck Crist moved to approve the requested conditional use with the condition that the sign
conform to the sign code and all material be removed from the site by December 27th of each
year. The PEC would review the conditional use permit, at the January 13th meeting, visit the
site during the site visits on December 9th, and at this time there would not be a time
limitation on the conditional use permit. Gena seconded the motion, and the vote was 4-1 in
favor. Kathy voted against the motion because she was not comfortable with allowing the
conditional use permit for an indefinite time.
6. A request for the establishment of a 90-day review perlod for a Commercial Core I
exterior alteration request, and a request for a worksession for the establishment of
a Special Development District and a request for revisions to View Corridors Nos. 1
and 2, for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ran�h Road/Lots A and B, Block 2,
Vail Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
-- tnc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margarltaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
This work session was led by Mike Mollica. The project architect, Craig Snowdon, showed a
massing model of the proposed structure. Mike showed a site plan and explained that four
additional applications would be required: a request to amend View Corridor #1, a request to
amend View Corridor #2, a request for a rezoning for a portion of Tract E, and a request for a
minor subdivision to incorporate the rezoned Tract E parcel into the Golden Peak House ,
parcel.
Mike then reviewed the zoning analysis. Departures from the CCI zone district standards of
the proposal would occur in height, amount of common area, number of units, amount of site
5
�
�'�
' v � �
coverage, and required loading spaces. Mike than reviewed the general site improvements
which would be included. Mike explained the nine SDD review criteria, although the staff
would not specifically address each of them at the work session. Next, the related policies in
the Vail Village Master Plan and the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan were discussed.
Mike felt the discussion issues should include proposed modifications to View Corridors No. 1
and No. 2, the project's departures from the Commercial Core I zone district standards, and
several issues concerning Tract E.
Clark Willingham and Ron Riley, applicants, explained that the use would be a hotel
operation. Craig Snowdon stated that he had met with the staff and felt that the project met
all the necessary criteria. Craig was anxious to know what else was needed. He showed site
and floor plans of the existing building and the proposed building and also photos which
overlay the view corridors. Craig also stated that the Bridge Street side would be upgraded
with heated pavers, per the Town's Streetscape Plan. �
Gena had concerns which included view infringement, extra GRFA, and expansion onto public
land. Clark explained that the proposal did not encroach on public land, but the land in �
question belonged to Vail Associates and was zoned Agriculture and Open Space. He added
that Vail Associates had basically agreed to sell the land to him, and if this land were to be
included in the calculations, all the overage numbers could be reduced. He felt that it was
impractical to try to attempt to amend the Tract E protective covenants, but would prefer to
first see whether or not the covenants applied.
Gena was also concerned about the height and the disappearance of the view of the ski
mountain. Clark felt the building itself was part of the view. Craig pointed out that the view
did not change until one was in front of the Red Lion. He felt that if one saw the Riva ski run
partway up Bridge Street, one did not need to continue to see it when continuing up the street.
Gena felt views disappeared when the height limits were exceeded. She was curious to know
what the Tract E deed said, and Gerry Arnold of Vail Associates stated that there was no
deed. There�were easements for the overhangs. Kristan asked if there was any information
on whether or not the improvements should be on-grade or above-grade, and Gerry did not
know of any information of this type. Ron Riley stated that there could not be any permanent
construction above the ground level on the easements. Clark Willingham indicated that 75%
of the owners must approve any changes to the covenants.
Mike stated the staff had not taken a definitive position on how to proceed with Tract E, and
he listed 4 possible options. Chuck Crist wanted to see the Golden Peak House remodeled,
but explained that the Town was not going to get the remodeling "free" because of the
economics involved. Regarding Tract E, he felt any of the options were fine. He was against
any modification to the AOS zone district. He was in favor of the restauranUdeck
development in the back of the building. Chuck felt that this was the most important portal to
the mountain and it was currently weak. He was not too concerned with increases to GRFA
and site coverage because the building was in the center of town. He was not in favor of
narrowing the entrance to the Vista Bahn, but was not concerned about the view corridor from
the parking structure because the building was hard to see from that vantage point. Chuck
was concerned about the view from Bridge Street and suggested perhaps leaving off the top
floor of the center part of the building. He was very concerned about the height and massing,
even though he realized that that was where the economic return would be gained. Chuck
6
�
i�
. a
- • •
could visualize Cyrano's wishing to add more stories to their building.
Kathy Langenwalter felt the approach was a nice change to the building. She was concerned
about height, view corridor encroachments and departures from the CCI zoning. Kathy felt the
requested height was not even close to the required height, and she reminded the applicants
that the Master Plan called for 3 to 4 floors. She felt that the remodeled building should not
exceed the height of the old building. Kathy was not too concerned with increases in square
footage. Regarding Tract E, she was opposed to changing the zoning or any modifications to
the zoning. However, if the portion of Tract E were purchased, then she could approve the
rezoning.
Ludwig had concerns with modifications to View Corridor No. 2. He had no problems with
GRFA, common areas, number of dwelling units, or the building envelope. Ludwig felt the
height was a very great concern. He also felt the center section should be left open. Walking
up Bridge Street, the impact of the proposed structure was that it would be massive. He
agreed with Kathy regarding Tract E.
Connie felt the building was overwhelming. She felt the view of the mountains was being
taken away and that the view was important, even if it was not protected by ordinance. Craig
responded that the center of the building could probably be infilled and no one would notice.
Craig said that increasing the height was making the product viable.
Jerry Valentine, a Golden Peak condo owner, felt that very little of the view of the mountain
would be lost. He felt the view of the present building was horrible. Connie replied that they
were replacing the view of the mountain with a roof top.
Valentine stated this was the first time the owners of the condos had agreed 100% to a plan.
He felt certain modifications could be made. Clark Willingham felt the idea of pulling the
center back was possible. However, he pointed out the view was lost only 6 feet farther along
Bridge Street. Ron Riley felt that perhaps something could be worked out.
Craig felt that, at present, the east end looked overwhelming next to Cyrano's, but that he
could not see the Cyrano's building staying in that configuration for more than a few years, for
the Cyrano's building would change in the near future. He added that Cyrano's lease would
expire in 18 months.
Diana Donovan did not feel that it was the PEC's job to make the project economically
feasible. She felt something th�ough the middle of the structure could be used to break up the
feeling of a large building. She wished for a large enough trash compactor to eliminate daily
garbage collection. Diana was opposed to modifying the view corridors, had a problem with
height and mass. She felt the project must "give" somewhere.
Craig stated he had started with a 4:12 roof pitch and Gary Murrain, the Town's Building
Official, had suggested lowering the roof to 3:12, which reduced the height by 3 feet.
Therefore, he felt that there were other areas that could be redesigned. Diana was concerned
with loading. She stated that trucks were piling up in the core area and suggested requiring
loading spaces like parking spaces.
�
With regard to Tract E, Diana was concerned about Vail Associates selling what had been
used for open space. She felt this was precedent setting and went against the Town goals.
7
�
, `i
• . •
Ron Riley pointed out Tract E goes all the way behind the Tivoli. He stated that the small
portion that was to be rezoned was consistent with the Master Plan and that the Master Plan
called for this area to be Ski Base Recreation.
Kristan Pritz explained that Ski Base Recreation was more of a use designation, uses like
dining decks, ski storage, etc. and that it was not intended to include residences and hotel
rooms.
Diana did not want to set a precedent to allow everything next to the mountain to become
commercial.
Ron Rily reminded Diana that the last plan for redevelopment of the Golden Peak House had
passed the PEC and had received positive reinforcement from the Town Council. He added
the restaurant dining deck had been pulled back since that proposal.
Diana hoped an employee unit or units could be included.
George Knox, a neighboring merchant, felt the Town should try to encourage commercial use
on the south side of the Golden Peak building. He stated that he received an increasing
number of tourists in his shop who wanted the ability to enjoy watching others' skiing and
summer use of the mountain. (The bike path use also contributed to their enjoyment.) He felt
the Town needed to see if there was a way to make this project happen. George reminded
the Board that this was a horrible looking building.
Diana felt there was " a little over and a little too much everywhere". Discussion followed
concerning the uses of the building. Kristan asked if the intent was to just purchase the area
of the existing easements on Tract E and address the deck extension at a later time. Clark
answered, "yes". Ron Riley stated that for the patio, a zoning change was needed. He felt
that Ski Base Recreation was the most suitable to accommodate the minor deck expansion.
Diana felt that the rezoning must fit into the larger concept and doubted if anyone was against
rezoning, but was concerned about the method.
2. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a bed and breakfast operation on
Lot 11A, Block 2, Vail Village 13th Filing/2625 A Bald Mountain Road.
Applicant: Eugenia G. Whiten
Planner: Betsy Rosolack
Betsy explained that all the requirements had been met, with the exception of the parking.
The staff felt that the parking was constricted and recommended that only one bedroom be
approved for use for a Bed and Breakfast operation. Chuck knew the house and agreed that
the parking was limited. Connie felt that the letter from the neighbors needed to be taken into
consideration. Ludi and Kathy felt the parking could be a problem.
Diana felt that the board should approve only one bedroom at the present time.
Chuck moved and Connie seconded to approve the B&B for one bedroom only. The vote was
5 in favor, none against, with Gena abstaining.
8
. �� ' � "� �
�� �� ��
1�• 2 s� 9r l�'C fiv � U,�:� C��,� � � - ✓'�/ \
(
�a.r- �euo� "�e ,� ,j� 7
— C✓�� �t/,�%��.�►-- m` ti�Q � �, ,���. ?
/"
— C S��
�
—��--�a�� .�c,� �a.-e �,. �P �.�•�.�c o� I 2=oo irww�,
�/ •-
��►-o� I�',— „�/ .�-c.�z � �a/�Fd�}� 4�C��,� — ����. �►�cti--�'`�.�;-. ,v-t.�.
__-----
%-•-� �
C� - v� � ��.�.( � �=� ,����;�. � 7�� � .
�
Gl�� C. K�� /2, — rr-� ��a„-:��` �-�,�e— - ,� , ,�, �-.�„�.
� %�� � �'
T� ii�` ,�,-.�-� ,p�,.,.ri� �-s-e ,�s � o���-e�`.
— %ti.-� � — �,.-'� � �}� . /� S� — �e :��, o��►-=�. ��c-��
`�� � �.-�� � ,�'-�. ,x�P �. — �r-�... / �
��/ e, � �
i�r .G� �-c a�2c.,
_�//���- ! .G>- � .L!/1 /i12��K
— G����i�� c:ez. 'P � O�
— ��,° ��w .� �.-z��.�,.-� �� � U.� ?3�
�- v,� GG�, � � -- � .��..�.� , -��.-- � ,�;�' �
^ �/.,�zw ..� ,�v�v�-�j' .� �,�� s�� — ��� � ,�7
a- � . /�.e.�.-�-v-e -���' �c ,`,.. �P c�.�
� J
" �ir-c e�-�--( z,-� �I`��� � i�-�� — .��-°ozf� ..Zaa� l���
1� f�� — �.�i� C=�--z.�,.z [� � �-ati�..-�.
, �����'`
� ��,� � /�'�' C''.en��'1 � �-P2 �
` �� � ��Yi� c�� � � _ �
(/L� L'l?�� I�.�a,--- � � G�o
� � � � � �
� �a�' — �I�Fl�- .r,�- . �
�
� ��
- T�.� � - �y�,� ,�s• �.�� � � � ��,,�
� ��.. ��. �� , :�.. `�,,,..�.,� .
� �� � �
_ K�-- a�,t,� w�
� V�,w C.avx.e� �'.e2 � �. �.-,-� ,
�— G��1�/ �l-�i�/Ger�-�-- r,�e- � -
�/ 1�/� � .
r' ����� ` -� .�'�-P .u�-�-
- T�-� �' — ��� �—� �
C-�-� K' ' rt ��.r-� � ( /<
,
_ !/,r,� Co�u=��-� - ��.-� .� � �'�-�._ �c� ,:�,,�.o-��'.`
i�-c �� �Z�2o(d.
— C� �� ,� — G�..�—� �°.�,�-� ���. �ch�. ,
c� s.� .� �� ?
� ��
�
� — h� — �� ���A� ��� ,� ,���
C��=�. — t��
�
C� ��� — �,—�., ,�:.-. ��.. �°.,�.� �� — � ,��� � ��:
� � �
,���C �l .��,� . 7'.� ���� � �� ��'� �
� ��� ��� �e C,��7`�� , �o,� �-c
%r�
��.� � � �,r-c��. 1'.�r � , � ,���� . �.�� ���
,�� �,- ��.,, ,
C� - �� �� �-. T-�-� � � 1�C �- �.�. �.��
,
---- , .--__------
_ _ _-- - _--
, __ __ __ _ _ _ _
�; _
;
� ' � ~ �
'`r
�
��- Ce,��� � -� - �-�-Z�;►-� ?
1� �� �����
_ ���� � � �` .z� ��
- d�� � � �� ce��-, � �
- � ,� �-,� �� - � n�- ��
�,��,� �-. � � . C'�..,:� ,G-� .G� �.���,.�,Q 1
O
� S f - � 3 �� �� ^��'� .���y!—�',,� 3`,
����
�
�j(iLPi►--R � �� i��7� /��e'L�� �c , 1�_ �< ?
_ � �- � _�- �.P�-
`� �� �( Lr l4 .�!Z'� � i���e �J,' �—P
U U
��� � �; �e o K, lti� � ��
� �
� � � � .
� �-- ��-� ��� �e ,� � , '
G ,
l�� ` 7-� 7'd V ��� .�- o� �it-d-� � a��. �-.��o��
-�� z� ,
�
� �
l0•/6• q( �-�,- �-� !yo*�-e
S,�-+�nldr,� GC�-� �v`
" . �
�� —� � �,L� Q�-�. -s�¢�s_ /T�-eCR-.f � �"XT, rl.vi; �j;�:.C.G�o+-�
0 /�
a� � �°".�� `� � J�°``�'� � . -
D� ---s Q ��,�,;2'`,�,;� � ,. a� � �tG� " /��2_ — �,,(�O,,;e�
G'��
��, ��r�� . . w,� �z�..� ? �5�c�,�_ �:—��
��,.-��,�,�.
�K � 0 S'��%'°u� �-� a�c-�.�.� � �� � ' �
i�
o„�.�r�.�e .�.�e ��-°�,�.� �.�)� � ���: . - . .
� �,G���..r.c,2, — �-. �.;�.jG�;��`. ,�vrv,�_;.��„�,,.,,w� �.:,� , .�'`c� �P�+-,w;., -,v,-.
✓ /�y���k �-°�c.�.r�. �
� �^ /1^�.v � .�,fi►'�i�= d���`'"' �;
cl�,L �. 5,�.�,,... ,� . �
� � a.v�.. . .
O
o K-� a 5.� s� ��,� �,� � _
� ����'�" ._ _ _._�y._. . _,. _.
�
�. � � _ ' .
--r -�� .���, ��y� � �- 7
�,�
-. ,�..� �,.,,,�.,� �;� , �,�. �. .:� �, � .
. -
� �,P�i�`.P.w ti.-/ 1/. l/�c.�'..�oy,P ��� �i�a�►.� ( �:cL 3 -2� 3-3�
I / ` /
, _ , . �
U K �' � /�� �n �.za-�.�?` � . - �-�-.�
/
-� �� � /.� - - S'�,
.�� � ,�,��. . . . -. _ . . . . .
� / `-2V'C-P�l w/ S /'!aY`-�� /�-Ow-
�
'� �-a.e U.V� 1"1a.�. ���„� -�°`� (!'o �n 4�� ,o-z'`.�-� .
� w� � `'�'�f��°�.-� ` ���,,-�. '��ti%►�„--�'
-� o� T��-�t` c� .�.-� �-�� ��,,�-.�. �
'�- /'�'l� ,� ' .
oK --. � s�,, ..e�;-�. ,�G'-�. . ,�.-e a� �- � �
� �
' - - . . • .:,-_ � '
� 7 .
124� ` .
, ,. . . . � . � . . � , � • • , f
� Sl�+-� � � � . � • �� ��,,,a,�� . ..�:>.xv ..
. _ _. - . � . .. , - . " • . . . �
� .^ • t '����L��� . . �� �/ Y �� � � . . � ���������� . ' �
���
�- r�
. . . � .
. . . ., _ , . . , . _ _. . . . .
— 1 �0 �. � . - - . -�� � _ � .
� ����
. � ��� .. . a� ,� � s:�.��._ � . . �. �
� . -. . . _ . ,.
-�- �,� ? ? . . . �
- ��- .��..�, �.�-'�� . , . . =- � �
� �
. - ��� 2 .�
. . . 4- � ' . ,. ' ... � � .,�\
� .�'�.0 _t. � �. �� � � �� �
. � ,� ,
� - ,�,� �- c��..�-P � �..«-..�` � 7�ti�=�r �� � �
� '� �. � ,.�. .,�.-� 7
. '. t�-c�^ ,�r_ � , y,r�,e�.,��°`. m�'���.�.a ,E�•c�..�f. .
/
., " , _ . . . . � �.� , . _ -_ , , , .. - '. ,. .
� V�/� . ��N�( �V�— • .. .-'.S�1'J+.�.--'�:t?_.��_r.%+�c-j *a�_� � . . .._. ._.__...
i�/`-/"�J � . —__..__�}j{_.._ ._..
� {
.., . , . . -
_ '.
___.._. --��9:�� _.,.i�i� ,�.',' . ,..•.��+ t,, _' _.. •
_. _ --- , _._�. _. _,__ �
. .��. '�iti �ti, t-•`'.}-�r.a\ . f'S��. `•.�:.. _��•�:�. _r•�.T� ���..�f;'t\ ,� '. • ; .. ..
, � �� y .
� � ` .
. .. � }.: . � .9-i'� . . . \ . • .. �: —��}'.• . - . .
. . . . y `> . . . .
p ...1,. �n. r17'� . , -� . . -- � `,"'\..v'.3.; . i'f'.. '. �' �e..�-.� ~ .n��, _ —�"r. i�_ .i �� •!��
� • • , ,i.1 ?'>�•.�,� .. . � _• �_,. d
. -�•`x. 3�,7. , . . . ." ..:ti_ . ..-j�. i`. .. ��i . _ . �h `. ; • . , -L,?l�!..i_ . i?y'�'^�. . � .
i��2�.c� ,�2� /1'y1 ��0 ��`�'% �� ��/1.��Q.l�12�� .
�� PUBLIC NOTICE �
►
. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on November 25, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
� 1. A request for the establishment of a 90-day review period for a Commercial Core I
exterior alteration request, and a request for a worksession for the establishment of a
Special Development District and a request for revisions to View Corridors Nos. 1 and
2, for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail
Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
2. A request for a conditional use permit for a liquor store at the Cascade Crossing Retail
Center, 1031 S. Frontage Road, more specificalfy described as ioilows:
A parcel of land located in Section 12, Township 5, South, Range 81 West of �
the P.M., County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at a point on the northerly ROW line of US Hwy 6, whence the
northeast corner of said Section 12 bears north 38°07' E 876.99 ft.; thence
south 73°,45' W along said northerly ROW line a distance of 75 ft. to the true
point of beginning; thence north 16°45' W to the south ROW line of I-70; thence
in a southwesterly direction along the south ROW line of I-70 to the point of
intersection of that ROW line with the north ROW line of US Hwy 6 and thence
in an easterly direction along the north ROW of US Hwy 6 to the point of
beginning, County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
Applicant: William Von Schweidall/Mike Combs
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a conditional use permit to operate the Cartwright Bed and Breakfast at
970 Fairway Drive/Lot 8A, Vail Village 10th Filing.
Applicant: Alice Cartwright
Planner: Betsy Rosolack
4. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a seasonal plant products business in
the Heavy Service zone district, West Vail Texaco, 2313 N. Frontage Road West/Tract
B, Vail Das Schone Filing No. 1.
Applicant: Richard Dilling
Planner: Jill Kammerer
5. A request for a conditional use permit to operate a bed and breakfast operation on Lot
11A, Block 2, Vail Village 13th Filing/2625A Bald Mountain Road.
Applicant: Eugenia G. Whitten
Planner: Betsy Rosolack
6. A request for a worksession on the proposed Performing Arts/Conference Center,
which is proposed to be located adjacent to the east end of the Lionshead Parking
Structure.
Presenters: Ron Phillips/E.B. Chester
�vd'
7. Presentation of the�rt in Public Places Board (AIPP) Conceptual Proposal for the
Village Transportation Center Project. �
Planner: Shelly Mello •
8. Presentation of proposed Lionshead Sundial Plaza landscaping plan (Lifthouse Lodge).
Presenters: Jill Kammerer/Sherry Dorward
9. Any items tabled from the November 11, 1991 Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting.
Information on the listed items is available at the Community Development office in the Vail
Municipal Building during regular office hours.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Puhlish?d in the V�il Trail on November 8, 1991.
>��2�U ;���� /1'n �'�����°- �i.-� 0�27-�
�U G "' �" �BLIC NO�E " '�
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on November 25, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
� 1. A request for the establishment of a 90-day review period for a Commercial Core I
exterior alteration request, and a request for a worksession for the establishment of a
Special Development District and a request for revisions to View Corridors Nos. 1 and
2, for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A and B, Block 2, Vail
Village First Filing.
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium AssociationNail Associates,
Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.
Planner: Mike Mollica
2. A request for a conditional use permit for a liquor store at the Cascade Crossing Retail
Center, 1031 S. Frontage Road, more specifically described as follows:
A parcel of land located in Section 12, Township 5, South, Range 81 West of
the P.M., County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at a point on the northerly ROW line of US Hwy 6, whence the
northeast corner of said Section 12 bears north 38°07' E 876.99 ft.; thence
south 73°,45' W along said northerly ROW line a distance of 75 ft. to the true
point of beginning; thence north 16°45' W to the south ROW line of I-70; thence
in a southwesterly direction along the south ROW line of I-70 to the point of
intersection of that ROW line with the north ROW line of US Hwy 6 and thence
in an easterly direction along the north ROW of US Hwy 6 to the point of
beginning, County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
Applicant: William Von Schweidall/Mike Combs
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a conditional use permit to operate the Cartwright Bed and Breakfast at
970 Fairway Drive/Lot 8A, Vail Village 10th Filing.
Applicant: Alice Cartwright
Planner: Betsy Rosolack
4. A request for a conditionat use permit to allow a seasonal plant products business in
the Heavy Service zone district, West Vail Texaco, 2313 N. Frontage Road West/Tract
B, Vail Das Schone Filing No. 1.
Applicant: Richard Dilling
Planner: Jill Kammerer
5. A request for'� conditional use permit to operate a bed and breakfast operation on Lot
11 A, Block 2, Vail Village 13th Filing/2625A Bald Mountain Road.
Applicant: Eugenia G. Whitten
Planner: Betsy Rosolack
6. A request for a worksession on the proposed Performing Arts/Conference Center,
which is proposed to be located adjacent to the east end of the Lionshead Parking
Structure.
Presenters: Ron Phillips/E.B. Chester
�� �-9/�'�'
� -
7. Presentation of the�rt in Public Places Board (AIPP) Conceptual Proposal for the
Village Transportation Center Project.
Planner: Sheliy Melio
8. Presentation of proposed Lionshead Sundial Plaza landscaping plan (Lifthouse Lodge).
Presenters: Jill Kammerer/Sherry Dorward
9. Any items tabled from the November 11, 1991 Planning and Environmental
Commission meeting.
Information on the listed items is available at the Community Development office in the Vail
Municipal Building during regular office hours.
TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on November 8, 1991.
• �
���-. 3� �q �� �
� 1 �old
c��� ���6� _
�
. � ����
-�- ►) �., ��. � , � �
� � �
-� �-� ��� a� a� ��
, � �
� � 5�,���� �a��� -� c�-��� - �
�
�► 5 ,���, �
� �-
--k- ,}� � 5� �-��-
�" ���- -�� �y�1�� o�s�� �.
�
,-�- • N� �� �DSv�- �9�,�. a� ��� t.
;
_ ___ ____._-:�..—__.__ _� __ __
_---_ __-_ ___ -�._ _____ _
,,
dw_ ________
__ ____ ---- --
_--_-_------��
;
. _____��}____,_ __ __--_ -----_- -
�,
�
,
i�
__ _ _____ __-
-- ___________�_________ _-- . _
��
__ � __ ___.__.______ _.
_ __ ___ _ -__ _ _- ----_______----_-- _ ____ _ _
_ -___�_____ _ __ - - - ___ ____ ________
_ _ ____ _ ___� __________ - -
, ___.___ _ _� . _ _.
�
---___. ---__ _ __ ___
__ _________ __ ____------___ ________
, _--,---- .___ ___. .___ _ __ _ _ _
,
,
�
;� �»
, • �
� F'IL E C�P �
,,
,+��,
tow� of uai ��
75 south frontage road office of community development
vail,colorado 81657
(303)479-2138
(303)479-2139
October 23, 1991
Mr. Craig Snowdon
Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
201 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Golden Peak House
Dear Craig:
As a follow up to our telephone conversation on Monday, I would like to reiterate a few key
points regarding the Golden Peak House redevelopment application. I have consulted with
Larry Eskwith, Town of Vail Attorney, and Larry concurs with the following comments:
1. As we discussed, the ownership of what appears to be a "public right-of-way" on the
north side of the Golden Peak House, specifically in the area of Seibert Circle is in
question. I have reviewed the fina� plat for Vail Village First Filing and it is inconclusive
as to whether the roadway was ever dedicated to the public. In order to resolve this
issue, the Town recommends that you obtain a title report in order to verify current
ownership of this property. As you are aware, the need to obtain the ownership
information for this property is specifically relevant to the existing Golden Peak House
building easements, and subsequent encroachments into the easements along the
north elevation of the building.
2. The Town staff has reviewed the proposal with regard to certain improvements
proposed to be located upon Tract E, which is located immediately to the south of the
Golden Peak House. We are also aware that there are certain restrictive covenants in
place regarding the allowable uses for Tract E. It is the Town's position that any
allowable and/or conditional use proposed for Tract E must meet the current zoning on
the property, which is Agricultural and Open Space. Regardless of the content of the
covenants for Tract E, we believe that the zoning currently in effect on the property
governs both the allowable and conditional uses for Tract E. While restrictive
covenants may limit land use to a greater extent than zoning, they may not permit
uses which the zoning ordinances prohibit. For your convenience, I have attached a
copy of the Agricultural and Open Space Zone District in its entirety.
u� "c`
• • .
� Mr. Craig Snowdon
October 23, 1991
Page 2
Generally, the Agricultural and Open Space zone district is a district which is intended
to permit a very limited single family use along with agricultural and open space uses.
There are no commercial uses currently allowed within this district. In order to
accommodate your proposed uses on Tract E (a canvas greenhouse enclosure over
the Los Amigos deck and an at-grade outdoor dining deck/patio), it would be
necessary to change the zoning on Tract E to a zone district which provides for those
types of commercial uses. Possible zone districts which would allow your proposed
commercial uses would include Commercial Core I, a modified Ski Base/Recreation
zone district, or a modified Agricultural and Open Space zone district.
You and I also discussed the issue of some existing encroachments from the Golden
Peak House over certain air spaces on Tract E. The Town has reviewed "Exhibit A to
the Condominium Declaration for the Golden Peak House," which essentially provides
horizontal and vertical easements and rights-of-way for the purposes of constructing
"private terraces, balconies, railings, roof overhangs, stairways, as well as supports,
walls and other elements." It is the Town's opinion that the existing encroachments
are legal, non-conforming uses. Chapter 18.64 of the Town of Vail Zoning Code
addresses non-conforming uses and structures, and specifically, the following sections
of the Code apply to the Golden Peak House:
"Section 18.64.040 - Uses
The use of a site or structure lawfully established prior to the effective date of
the ordinance codified in this title which does not conform to the use regulations
prescribed by this title for the district in which it is situated may be continued,
provided that no such nonconforming use shall be enlarged to occupy a greater
site area for building floor area than it occupied on the effective date of the
ordinance codified in this chapter. Any subsequent reduction in site area of
floor area occupied by a nonconforming use shall be deemed a new limitation,
and the use shall not thereafter be enlarged to occupy a greater site area or
floor area than such new limitation. (Ord. 8(1973) § 20.400)
Section 18.64.090 - Restoration
Whenever a nonconforming use which does not conform with the regulations for
the district in which it is located or a nonconforming structure or site
improvement which does not conform with the requirements for setbacks,
height, density control, building bulk control or site coverage is destroyed by fire
or other calamity, by act of God or by the public enemy, its use may be
resumed or the structure may be restored, provided the restoration is
commenced within one year and diligently pursued to completion. All new
construction must conform to the applicable Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Fire Code and other relevant codes regarding safety and construction which are
in effect at the time rebuilding is proposed. (Ord. 39(1982) § 1: Ord. 35(1981)
§ 1: Ord. 8(1973) § 20.900)"
� � �
� Mr. Craig Snowdon
October 23, 1991
Page 3
3. The planning staff and Town Attorney have reviewed your question regarding whether
at-grade stairs/walkways could be constructed upon Tract E to provide pedestrian
access to the hotel and some of the retail shops. It is the staff's opinion that any
improvements upon Tract E which are specifically related to hotel and/or commercial
types of uses cannot be permitted under the existing zoning. Again, it would be
necessary to change the zoning of Tract E to a zone district which provides for those
types of commercial uses.
It is my hope that the above information will clarify some of the issues we discussed.
However, if you should have any questions on the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
��� �����
Mike Mollica
Assistant Director of Planning
/ab
Enclosure
cc: Clark Willingham
Ron Riley
Larry Eskwith
Kristan Pritz
11 i
/o�ra� �' � �s�.f�,- l�..� l�,-�-e C� 5�-
� l��� � �,�-�l --� ��( �,�-, a.�`e. z� U,� ��'-� ?
Y�, •� ,�e�c�+y� o�.:�n� .��.� ,z�'t,e� ��.�e ✓� �� ���
I�,� G`��o*�a� - ,�v$-� �1�. �/-�;- ��Uy� �.�.:-•� � c c�
Q o,�� � V,� C��;C,� � l - ,��n;�i� ... �.,...�.e�( m
,
��.. �'e ,��-�.-� ?
�''1�y sJ ,� ,�w � �u.H,.- — ,�.
c�•- ,�e-�e ? �l� - .�- v�`' �r� w,,. ;w�au.e .�,._
�e ��� .
� /��-�. � a��f �� �eti. cQVu:� ? - � /Ki'
� ��
�'''1 av-e �a�w%�vl �oz� � -`'�-�T '
. �
����
`� UA y c�- .e.�..,�.� ��.e,w..0 �c� �- �- a��e�,
r�M•-x`� . /��//
�` ' �� ` � �-��`' ��"''.
�. G� � ��,
-- ,�,� � - �L �.G� ��. �.e ?�
""�'� �
- �'.� �- 7'� � - ����e .� � _�� „
,��..v-�•-� — � a�-���+C . /��-:-�,d� ,r��
..(re � �r�..�,1.� . C�--�C. ..-� - .z. /ke .� -�
��,� � �
SbD
� �2�-� �'
� � f
�����
� �.�z�e �ri�� �
-�9 F.��.��
,:
w �-
.
� � �NOV � �1991
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 11/14/91
APPLICATION FORM FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
I. This procedure is required for any project that would go
through the Special Development District Procedure.
The application will not be accepted until all information
is submitted.
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
A. APPLICANT See Exhibit A (attached)
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE
B. APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Snowdon and Hopkins - Architects
ADDRESS 201 Gore Creek Drive, Vail CO PHONE 476-2201
C. PROPERTY OWNER See Exhibit B (attached)
OWNER�S SIGNATURE PHONE
MAILING ADDRESS
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
STREET ADDRESS 2�8 �Ianson Ranch Road, Vail , CO 81657
LOT A&B gLOCK 2 SUBDIVISION N�A FILING Vail Village First
E• A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to
the subject property and their mailing addresses.
II. Four (4) copies of the following information:
A. Detailed written/graphic description of proposal;
B. An environmental impact report shall be submitted o the
zoning administrator in accordance with Chapter 18. 56
hereof unless waived by Section 18 . 56. 030, exempt
projects;
C. An open space and recreational plan sufficient to meet
the demands generated by the development without undue
burden on available or proposed public facilities;
D. Existing contours having contour intervals of not more ,
than five feet if the average slope of the site is
twenty percent or less, or with contour intervals of
� not more than ten feet if the average slope of the site
is greater than twenty percent.
E. A proposed site plan, at a scale not smaller than one
inch equals fifty feet, showing the approximate
locations and dimensions of all buildings and
structures, uses therein, and all principal site
development features, such as landscaped areas,
recreational facilities, pedestrian plazas and
walkways, service entries, driveways, and off-street
parking and loading areas with proposed contours after
grading and site development;
� 4
� �
.
F. A preliminary landscape plan, at a scale not smaller
than one inch equals fifty feet, showing existing
landscape features to be retained or removed, and
showing proposed landscaping and landscaped site
development features, such as outdoor recreational
facilities, bicycle paths, trails, pedestrian plazas
and walkways, water features and other elements;
G. Preliminary building elevations, sections, and floor
plans, at a scale not smaller than one-eighth equals
one foot, in sufficient detail to determine floor area,
gross residential floor area, interior circulation,
locations of uses within buildings, and the general
scale and appearance of the proposed development.
III. Time Requirements
The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd
and 4th Mondays of each month. An application with the
necessary accompanying material must be submitted four weeks
prior to the date of the meeting.
NOTE: It is recommended that before a Special Development
District application is submitted, a review and comment
meeting should be set up with the Department of
Community Development.
IV. FEES
Application Fees are as follows:
a. Establishment of SDD: $1,500.00
b. Major Amendments: $1,000.00
c. Minor Amendments: $ 200.00
Application fee paid: $1 ,500 . 00 Date 11/14/91 Check 4� 6282
If this application requires a separate revieW by any local, State or
Federal aqency other than the To++n of Vail, the application fee shall be
increased by $200.00. Examples of auch zeview, may include, but are note
limited to: Colorado Department of Hiqhway Access Permits, Army Corps of
Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for payinq any publishinq fees which
are in excess of 50$ of the application fee. If, at the applicant' s
request, any matter is postponed foz hearinq, causing the matter to be
re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid
by the applicant.
i�►pplications deemed by the Community Development Department to have
significant desiqn, land use or other issues which may have a siqnificant
impact on the con�nunity may require review by consultants other than town
staff. Should a determination be made by the town staff that an outside
consultant is needed to review any application, the Community Development
may hare an outside consultant, it shall estimate the amount of raoney
necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the
Town by the applicant at the time he files his application with the
Community Development Department. Opon completion of the review of the
application by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded by the
applicant for payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the
consultant shall be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the
Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the applicant sha�l be paid to
the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the Town.
� �
• • SY
f "
� y,
� `�
- ..+��:N:!Y r..�:' '����� � �'.
EXHIBIT A ' `s
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
APPLICANTS
;;.;,
,.
� �
,
Golden Peak House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476 5667
By: �',
Ronald H. Riley, Preside
Vail Associates, Inc. '�
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658 � ,
( 303) -5601
By: � ���.-�
Lar E . Lich iter, Vice President
,�'�Ft, 5 r '�.
GPH Partners, Ltd. (Developer) �
300 Crescent Court
Dallas , Texas 75201
( 214) 855- 06 ' "
By�
Clark S . Willin am, General Partner
' Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303) 476- 080 •
�
By: ,
Ronald H . Riley, President
,�.
'� �.��.
�
9/15/91 t;:�
�
s�
�� .�
. , � � • • j r}�
1 1
;i�}1��J�''`';�
EXHIBIT B
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE ��"'
s;;
Y•
OWNERS "� '�
� � �`
aolden Peak House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-5667
By:
Ronald H. Riley, Pre ' ent
Vail Associates, Inc. ,�
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658 �
( 303) 47 5601 �
gY: ,G�G ` �'e'L ,
arr E . Lichli er, Vice President
, -,:.
� :r
Margaritaville, Inc. �3
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657 ��
,:
( 303 ) 476- 080
� � ��
By�
. ,
Ronald . Riley, Preside
t;t�p�, `
. . ..1 �` t Yf� . ..
'.4:
:..'�• ,
� � . . � ' ���i
. . . � . .'�y:;��., � 'i
•� ... .e�:.
F_
9/15/91 "�
,;';.;= ;�
�
_ . .. �
_ �,, � ,
<::�:.:;:�<::»;.>..>.<;::.>.:;->::>::>::»:<:>::::�<:>:>::::.;«<<-:
.....::.:::.::::.:::..::.........:.::: ;;::,.::,;:.,::..:::.,.:
: ;::�«:::;;.:::.;::.;.;:::...; :::.:>:.:>::: ...........:.........,.:.......:.:...:,.:,.::;>.:::<>.<,:>
.;>;:.;:::�::::::.:::::::.....
.............................. .. ........:.:.:.::::._:.:.::. :.
_ . .............. ... . . , ....., ::::.;;:::..::.:::.::;:.�<...::...
... .:::�:•.>:::.::::��:.:_.��:.�� .:,�.�:::...�:.:.,•`�ti>...�:::::>:�::..,,�::.,�::....�..�::::.�..�:..�,.�a..........�;.::�.,:;......:.,....
TOWN OF VAIL �
DEPARTMENT OF COM1ViUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SALES ACTION FORM
, �
�� / � �� / /
:
DATE: � ( -
ACCOUNT NO. ' ! �TEM NO.' C�ST EA. TOTAL
O 1 0000 41330 COM.DEV.APPLICATION FEES % - ' :�. � � ��
Ol 0000 41540 ZOI�IING AND ADDRESS MAPS $5.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM BUII.DING CODE $50.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE $36.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHAr1ICAL CODE $32.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM FIRE CODE $36.00
O1 0000 42415 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE $30.00
O1 0000 42415 OTHER CODE BOOKS
01 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS(MYLARS) $7•�
O1 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES/STUDIES $0.25
01 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES/RE-INSPECTIONS
O1 0000 42322 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
O1 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES �
O1 0000 41330 OTHER FEES
O1 0000 41413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE $2�•a1
O1 0000
�
y���j �
COMMENTS: � " t"'/';''=' �� �'��'�-
� i
� � i�� /,
SNOWDON & HOPKINS A' HITECTS n 2 � M m �n
201 Gore Creek Driv� L�LS����� �� �Ql,z11JV�I1W0��lrJL�
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
DATE JOB NO.
(303) 476-2201 2 a
ATTENTION `
. 0
RE:
ro 0 � �
y � _ � s r�i�
-��' � � � J . ,
°���z � ��'/
� WE ARE SENDING YOU 1�Attached ❑ Under separate cover via � the follcwing items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order �" ��� ��f�
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
s ��� � G� � ��
� �' ' �, h-
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
,�For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
> ❑ As requested O Returned for corrections O Return corrected prints
� For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 � PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS •
�, �I s ��,. , �' � �� -
� ��" �' � � s �e�b
, � � o � �� a .
�� - � / S �` . � �� �s
� �, �, 7 �/'�1, � �,'
,
,� l�'�1���� � S G G7 �r'!' �-
� � �
� ,� � , �'' �G'2 G
(/� , � 0 AL � p� 4 � � � � � �
�� .� 0 /lyI � 0 � ,�� 6 � ,�� .
COPY TO I�
SIGNED:
PROWCT260-2 Ees Inc.,GmNn,Mas oian. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
y/'� ~ �, Date c�ppl ication 9/15/91
,
Date of PEC Meeting To be Decided
APp�ICATION FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS �� ����
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I •
VAIL VILLAGE
I. Planning and Environmental Commission re��iew is required for the alteration
of an existing building which adds or r�moves any enclosed floor area or
outdoor patio or the replacement of an existing building LOCATED IN THE CCI
DISTRICT. FOLLOWING PEC APPROVAL , THE PROJECT MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE DRB.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT See attached Exhibit A
AQDRESS
PHONE
B. NAME OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE Snowdc-�n and Fiopkins — Architects
ADDRESS y01 �ore Creek Drive , Vail , Colorado 81657
PHONE 303-476-9169
C. NAME OF OWNER (print or type) See attached Exhibit B
' ��/9! � �i-���
�- � � �
� � ����
�$ �
��w
'�' � PHONE
D, LOCA IOT��PR P0� LEGAL Lots A & B Block 2 V ' First
, , azl Village Filing
ADDRESS 278 Hanson Ranch Road , Vail , Colorado 81657 •
E. FEE $200.00 (LESS THAN 100 SQ.FT. ) pqID � CK 412017 gy CS6V
X $50Q.00 (MORE THA;� 100 SQ, FT. ) -
5•28'� �
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE CO:vL^1UNITy DEV�LOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL
REVIEW YOUR PROJECT.
II. PRE-APPLICATION �CONFERENCE;
A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENC� WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SU6GESTED
TO DETERMINE IF ANY ApDITIONAL INFORMATION 1S NEEDED. NO APPLICATION WILL
BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST I�.CLUDE ��LL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR) . IT IS THE APPLICANI"' S RES��NSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINT-
MENT WITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STR��^'�(.INE TNE APPROVAL PROCESS
FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DE�ING THE NUMBER OF COND;TIONS OF APPROVAL THAT
THE PEC MAY STIf'ULATE. ALI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVA! MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE
A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUQMITTED:
A. Improvement survey of property showing property lines and location of
building and any improvements on the land.
B. A list of the namES of owners of all property adjacent to the subject
property INCLUDIPJG PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and their mailing
• addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIaLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADORESSES.
OVER
; �
• • �
� - � �
�
EXHIBIT A
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
APPLICANTS
Golden Peak House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303 ) 476 5667
By� �r
Ronald H. Riley, Preside
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658 �
( 303) -5601
By: � �'7--C�.
Lar E . Lich iter, Vice President
GPH Partners, Ltd. (Developer)
300 Crescent Court
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 855- 06 � �'
By:
Clark S . Willin am, General Partner
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303 ) 476- 080
By: �
Ronald H. Riley, President
9/15/91
` � � • �
EXHIBIT B
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
OWNERS
Golden Peak House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-5667
By: ,
Ronald H. Riley, Pre ' ent
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658�
( 303) 47 5601 � �
B � �
Y�
arr E . Lichli er, Vice President
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303) 476- 080
By: �
Ronald . Riley, Preside
9/15/91
f R
, ` � �1=
�/(tJ �blti1 G, v 1r.71,
PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING•DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS•RESEARCH
C�� SNo��eN
May 24 , 1991 �7(p� z2� 1
Mr. Mike Mollica, Senior Planner
Department of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mike:
Attached is the application for an exterior alteration and
modification for the Golden Peak House which has been prepared by
Snowdon and Hopkins Architects.
As we have discussed previously and in accordance with your
letter dated May 20, 1991 several other applications may need to
be filed subsequently in order to accomplish the proposed
redevelopment. These potentially include:
1. View corridor amendments.
2 . Rezoning of a portion of Tract E covering the area of the
Los Amigos deck expansion.
3 . Modification of the Ski Base Recreation Zone District.
4 . Application for rezoning to Special Development District.
5. Application for a Conditional Use Permit.
We anticipate that all required applications will be filed in
accordance with applicable Town of Vail rules and regulations and
will be filed prior to any final action regarding the exterior
alteration application.
We look forward to working with you on this exciting project.
Sincere ,
Pet Ja r, AICP
Suite 204, Vail National Bank Building
108 South Frontage Road West • Vail,Colorado 81657 • (303)476-7154
PJ:ne
� �
, . : � ' �, Date oi,�pl ication 5/2�./91
. ,
� Date of PEC Meeting 'ro be Decided
APPLICATION FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I
VAIL VILLAGE
I. Planning and Environmental Commission review is required for the alteration
of an existing building which adds or removes any enclosed floor area or
outdoor patio or the replacement of an existing building LOCATED IN THE CCI
DISTRICT. FOLLOWING PEC APPROVAL, THE PROJECT MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE DRB.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT See attached Exhibit A
ADDRESS
PHONE
B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Snowdon and F�opkins - Architects
ADDRESS 201 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Colorado 81657
zzo (
PHONE 303-a76-�
C. NAME OF OWNER(S) (print or type) See attached Exhibit B
� SIGNATURE(S)
ADDRESS
PHONE
First
D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL Lots A & B, Block 2 , Vail Village Filing
ADDRESS 278 Hanson Ranch Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
E. FEE _ $200.00 (LESS THAN .100 SQ.FT.) PAID CK �� 2017 gy CSW
X $500.00 (MORE THAN 100 SQ. FT.)
THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL
REVIEW YOUR PBOJECT.
II. PRE-APPLICATION ,CONFERENCE:
A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO DETERMINE IF ANY ADOITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION WILL
BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT' S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINT-
MENT WITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS
FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT
THE PEC MAY STIf'ULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE
A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE S�16MITTED:
N. Impro�rement survey ��f propet ty shcwin� pre�ert,y 1 ines and location of
building anci any irr,�rovement.s on the land.
B. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subject
property INCLUDiNG PROPERTY BEHIND AND �ICROSS STREETS, and their mailing
. addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESS�S.
OVER
► �_'
�
''r K
� ' � � • l • 1 �
� •
1 t
1
�
'Nt/ld 311ISN3H3�dW0� S�lItlA H1IM 3�NdIldWO� a0� 03M3IA3� 38 IIIM ltlSOdObd bf10Jl 'I I IA
'S11 590'tiZ'8l NOI1�3S 33S `31f1�3H�S M3I113b 3Hl NO S�I�I�3dS 3�OW b0�
'M3IA3b NOISSIWWO� ltIlN3WN0aIAN3 aNt/ 9NINNdId b0� H1NOW 3Hl �0 3WI1 a3bI(lb3a �
3Hl ld 0311IW8f1S 39 A11W 133� 3atlflbS OOL Nt1H1 3�OW lON �0 d3bt! a001� o3SOl�N3
ANt! S3110W3a b0 Sa0t1 1tIHl 9NIOlif18 9NIlSIX3 N11 �0 NOIlt/b3lltl 3Hl a0� SNOIlt/�Ilddd
'NOISS3S M3IA3a Jla11NIWIl3bd 3Hl �0 SAt/� 09 NINIIM Ol3H 38 lltlHS 9NI�tl3H �IlBfld
11 '31t1a 1t111IW8f1S 3H1 �0 SAtlO lZ NIHlIM NOISS3S M3I113b Aa11NIWIl3bd b SOIOH
�3d 3Hl 'a38W3A0N b0 At1W �0 AtfONOW H1bf10� 3Hl 3b0�38 0311IW8(1S 38 Ol 033N
A3Hl 'AlltlflNNtf-IW3S 03M3I113a AlNO 3a11 d3�t! b001� �0 133� 3ati(lUS OOl Nt1Hl 3bOW
9NIAl0ANI I�� NI SNOIlt/�I�IUOW 210 SNOI1�N31111 b0Ib31X3 b0� SNOI111�Ilddd 'IIII
'NOIltl�Ildd11 3Hl �0 M3I113� 3H1 a0.�
A2ldSS3�3N SI lt1I213111W lt/NOIlIaa'd 111H1 3NIWb3130 At/W �O1d211SINIWat/ 9NINOZ 3Hl 'IA
'WaO� �IHdb2i9 2!0 N311I21M NI Ol ONOdS3a 1Sf1W 1Nb'�Ilddt/ 3Hl 1dH1
S3f1SSI 9NINOZ b3H10 S38I��S3a OSIt/ I�� b0� 3Q0� 9NINOZ lIdll �0 NMOl 3Hl 'A
'QOOHb08H9I3N 3H1 �0 �31�t/bk/H� 3Nl HlIM 3l8IlFIdWO� SI ItISOdO�d 3H1 '�
'(8)OZZ'tiZ'8l
NOI1�3S NI 0310N 3btf S39NtlH� b0.� 3af1a3�0ad 3H1 `Ntlld 3QIf19 N9IS3a
Ntl92i(1 39t/llIl1 1I1111 3Hl Ol 39Nt/H� b0['t1W tl 9NISOd02id SI 1Nt/�Ildd'd 3Hl �I
'�13 `SOlOHd
`(S9NIOlIftB 9NI�08H9I3N 9NIOf1l�NI) Sl3a0W `SNOIldlflWIS `S3H�13�S St/
H�f1S `SNt/3W �IHdt�219 A8 a3SS3ba0d 38 Ol(IOHS SW31I 31108t1 3Hl .�0 ANtIW
� uo��e.�apisuo� apeys uns •g
sMa�� 'L
�y6�aH 6u�p��n8 •g
a6P3 �aa.��s 'S
aanso��u3 �aaa�s •ti
�.�oMawe.�� ade�s�aa.��S '£
uo��e,��auad a���ya� •Z
uo��eziue�a�sapad ' L
�9NIa21t/J321 Ndld 30If19
N9IS30 NdB�fl 3JdllIll lItlll 3Hl HlIM S3IldW0� Allt/IlNd1S8f1S lt1SOd0�d 3H1 '8
'0�0'tiZ'8L NI 03I�I�3dS Sd
1�I2f1SI0 I�� 3Hl �0 S3SOd21fld 3Hl H1IM 3�Nt/Wb0�N0� NI SI lbSOdObd 3H1 't/
�ltlHl
9NIltl�IONI NOISSIWWO� 1b1N3WN0�IlIN3 aNti 9NINNtIId 3H1 3b0�39 3�N30IA3 .�0
3�Nd213aNOd3bd d WaO� �IHdt/a9 ONb N311I21M NI lIW8f1S lIt/HS 1NY/�Ilddd 3Hl 'I1I
•s�.uawaspa pue d�ysaauMO �'��aan o� �,�odaa a���� y� •� �,
•s�uawano,�dw� pue
sa.�n��n,��s �s6u�p�inq pasodoad pue 6u��s�xa <<e �o uoi�e�o� ayl '3
, •so��ed �6u����spup� pasodo.�d pue 6u��s�xa ayl •p
•ape,�6 �}o �aa� oM� �o a6uey� e s� aaay� a.�aun; eaae uo�sue�xa
u� aa� paa��baa aq �'�uo ���Ks uc;���puo:, s i+�� •san�,�uo� pasodoad pu�
6u��s�xa 6u�pn��u� a��s ay� �o ,�a��ea�y� �iydeaE�do� 6ui�s�xa ayl •�
•ue�d a��s ay� uo uMOys aq ��eys NOI1dI��S30 11193 1 S1I HlIM
�uawdo�anap pasodoad ay� �o aweu pue a�e�s `MO.�.Ap y�,�ou �a�ep ayl •8
•pa����snC �� �uaw�aedaa �uawdo�anaQ
�C�iunw�uo� ay� �q panoadde aq �'ew a�e�s ao az�s �aays ay� �o UOL�pLapA
11 'alIS 3H1 O1 S1N3W3/1021dWI 03SOd0bd ONt1 9NIlSIX3 9NIMOHS �OZ = „l �o
a�e�s e �e „9£ x „�z �o az�s �aays e uo uMeap aq ��eys uE�d a�is ayl •y
� :uo��ewao,�u� 6u�MO��o� ay� 6u�uie�uo� ue�d a��s e �o sa�do� (�) ano� 'III
I��
� __._
, �,. � • •
. �
EXHIBIT A
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
APPLICANTS
Golden Peak House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303 ) 476-5667
By: /�t-
Ronald H. Riley, Presi nt
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Col rado 81658
(303) 4 -5601
By: �.'G�-
ar y E Lichl ' er, Vice President
GPH Partners, Ldt. (Developer)
300 Crescent Court
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214 ) 855-�6 ' ,
,
;
By: �
Clark S . Willin , General Par ner
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 476-0 80
By: �
Ronald H. Riley, Preside t
5/27/91
; .
. , ,' � • •
EXHIBIT B
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE
OWNERS
Golden Peak House Condominium Association
278 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303 ) 476-5 67
By:
Ronald H. Riley, resident
Vail Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
( 303) 47 -560]n
By: {�� ' ,�"
Lar y . Lich iter, Vice President
Margaritaville, Inc.
228 Bridge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
( 303 ) 476-00 0
By: ,
Ronald H. Riley, Presi t
5/27/91
� 1 •
� FILE�OPY
.
-���� -�
� ��;;
tow� ofi uail �
75 south frontage road office of community development
vail,colorado 81657
(303)479-2138
(303)479-2139
May 20, 1991
Mr. Peter Jamar
Peter Jamar Associates, Inc.
108 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Golden Peak House
Dear Peter:
The intent of this letter is to follow up on our meeting of Thursday, May 16, 1991, regarding
the Golden Peak House. Attending the meeting were John Perkins, Craig Snowdon, Kristan
Pritz and myself. Discussion at that meeting centered on the proposed redevelopment plan
for the Golden Peak House, and more specifically, the planning process the project would
foltow. Outlined below is a summary of the steps we agreed would be necessary for said
redevelopment:
1. An exterior alteration application will be required. Please note that applications for a
"major" exterior alteration are accepted only semi-annually by the Town of Vail. The
two submittal dates are the 4th Monday of May and the 4th Monday of November.
2. The establishment of a Special Development District was discussed. If you decide to
go this route, a separate application will be required.
3. It appears that the proposed redevelopment may encroach into two existing view
corridors. If this is the case, view corridor amendment requests will need to be �
submitted.
4. As discussed, your proposal is to expand the Los Amigos deck and to rezone this area
from the existing Agriculture and Open Space to Ski Base/Recreation. A rezoning
application will need to be submitted to cover the area immediately south of the
existing Los Amigos deck.
t � • •
' Mr. Peter Jamar
May 20, 1991
Page 2
5. If your proposal includes the elimination of any existing dweiling or accommodation
unit, a Conditional Use Permit will be required, as specified in Section 18.24.040 of the
Zoning Code.
6. It is possible that a minor subdivision application will be submitted. Although the
planning staff believes this is not necessary, this decision should be left up to the
applicant.
Also discussed at our meeting was the fact that the existing Ski Base/Recreation Zone District
is currently designed to specifically facilitate redevelopment at the Golden Peak Ski Base.
The staff acknowledges that considerable work will need to be done to reorganize this zone
district so that it can be applicable to other sites. After further thought on this issue, the
planning staff suggests that the reorganization of the zone district be a part of the
redevelopment process for the Golden Peak House. Again, this was based upon our
discussions that it is your desire to rezone the area south of the Los Amigos deck to Ski
Base/Recreation.
As you are aware, the Town has contracted with Tom Braun & Associates to undertake a
major overhaul of the Town's zoning code. At this time, Tom has a rough draft of the
proposed modifications to the Ski Base/Recreation Zone District. The Town is certainly willing
to share this information with you, and I will forward a copy of Tom's draft to you as soon as I
receive it. Due to the Community Development Department's current commitments and
project work load, the staff believes, from a timing standpoint, it would be more appropriate for
you to proceed as the applicant, with the changes to the zoning code at this time.
I believe the above outlines the planning process which was discussed during our meeting.
However, if you should disagree, or have any questions regarding any of the above, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
��'� �"'��`�'�--
Mike Mollica
Senior Planner
/ab
cc: Kristan Pritz '
Craig Snowdon
John Perkins
� � � �
S'�6• � t �o�,._ �� h�o�-e Kt�� }� s�.,�,., �. /.�,, c. 5��,..
�� �� ��� S ��� �?.�
�F�j�rvol�l Sa,.. Zs , 19�'�
�
��
�1a��C �r �f P'� - ��_ .�.y 7`�- ��..�,w,._
O
' ��� ,[oa- A�,..z � � l2 '�2 � �`�o*� .� /O �.ee«e«�-7` C,c��c�C .E�'�'�
� � � �� �
� ��� ����
- �,�.�- �� �� �- �. �� ���� .
_ ��� ����` � � �°�``�
�,� : � s.��
�___-�
� �� �.,���
1� V,�.�, ��.�. �. �2��
-� K ,�� � �•-- � S�G � � �
� r►�t,�;.,� S,�.G. _ �" .�e n.�.� ?7
_ G�� /°.e� f�� .K c� -�
- �� .�. ��a� s� - � �,�,---� � s� t3.� ,e� .
� /� 'y�, ..� ,� � . .� � .� �. %�"..� ^� ��.� ' o�
�"0 . _ \
,� � ���� � t ����P, ��... �,_ ,� � J
� �
-- �,�Y'!� �,w�� /.1,._ c.�-� G1 ,s� � .�—c . �o� � � �4,�,.a. .
� 5.��`��'-�e
- �� ,��� - � �c ��
- ,��-�, � � .�'�e .
��� . .
� �.��- � s� � ��,�...� - ,�;� .�� � ,
��
' • A L T A C O M M I T M E N T � � `
SCHEDULE A
Application No. V17002
For Information Only
PRELIMARY REPORT
- Charges -
ALTA Owner Policy
PRELIMINARY REPORT $250. 00
- - TOTAL - - $250. 00
With your remittance please refer to V17002 .
1. Effective Date: May 16, 1991 at 8 : 00 A.M.
2 . Policy to be issued, and proposed Insured:
"ALTA" Owner's Policy
1987 Revision (Amended 1990)
Proposed Insured:
TBD
3 . The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4 . Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as
follows:
CONDOMINIUM UNITS 100 THROUGH 107, 201 THROUGH 2O8 , 220, 301
THROUGH 310, 401 AND 402 , GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE, ACCORDING TO THE
CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 9 , 1971, IN BOOK 221
AT PAGE 613 AND AS DEFINED IN CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE RECORDED AUGUST 3 , 1971, IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE
224 , SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SAID
CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
PAGE 1
' A L T � C O M M I T M E N T � �
SCHEDULE B-1
(Requirements) Application No. V17002
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
l. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of
the full consideration for the estate or interest to be
insured.
2 . Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be
insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE REQUIRES RETURN
ADDRESSES ON DOCUMENTS SENT FOR RECORDING! !
PAGE 2
'. A L T � C O M M I T M E N T �
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions) Application No. V17002
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the
following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of
the Company:
1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet.
6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special
assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office.
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land.
8 . Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
9 . RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 12 , 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 12 , 1899,
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
11. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR
NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 10, 1962 , IN
BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179 .
12 . TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED November
29 , 1966 IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 457 .
13 . THOSE PROVISIONS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTIONS,
WHICH ARE A BURDEN TO THE CONDOMINIUM UNIT DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A, AS
CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 03 , 1971, IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 224
AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED October 09 , 1981, IN BOOK 330 AT PAGE
186.
14 . EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN AND RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE.
15. A DEED OF TRUST DATED July 20, 1977 FROM RILEY VAIL CORPORATION, A COLORADO
CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF EMPIRE
SAVINGS, BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $104 , 000. 00,
AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED August 02 ,
1977 , IN BOOK 258 AT PAGE 49 .
PAGE 3
' A L T � C O M M I T M E N T � � �
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions) Application No. V17002
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED BY ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS
RECORDED August 02 , 1977, IN BOOK 258 AT PAGE 50.
EXTENSION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
March 29, 1985, IN BOOK 410 AT PAGE 9 .
16. A DEED OF TRUST DATED January O1, 1986 FROM RILEY VAIL CORPORATION, A
COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
FIRSTBANK OF VAIL TO SECURE THE SUM OF $525, 000. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS
PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED January 03 , 1986, IN BOOK 433 AT
PAGE 651.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
January 03 , 1986, IN BOOK 433 AT PAGE 652 .
EXTENSION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
March 12 , 1987 , IN BOOK 452 AT PAGE 67 .
EXTENSION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
March 21, 1988 , IN BOOK 480 AT PAGE 878 .
NOTE: ITEMS 15 AND 16 AFFECT UNIT 100 .
17 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED December 13 , 1985 FROM RONALD H. RILEY, ROBERT
W. RUDER AND MICHAEL D. STAUGHTON TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR
THE USE OF ALPINE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF
$730, 000. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF,
RECORDED December 16, 1985, IN BOOK 432 AT PAGE 350 .
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
December 16, 1985, IN BOOK 432 AT PAGE 351.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA IN
ASSIGNMENT RECORDED March 26, 1990, IN BOOK 525 AT PAGE 307 .
18 . FINANCING STATEMENT WITH FIRSTBANK OF VAIL, THE SECURED PARTY, RECORDED
November 25, 1986, IN BOOK 452 AT PAGE 968 .
NOTE: ITEMS 17 AND 18 AFFECT UNITS 105, 106 AND 107 .
19 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED April 23 , 1990 FROM RONALD L. HUGHES AND VICTORIA
A. HUGHES TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF INDEPENDENCE
ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $65, 600. 00, AND ANY OTHER
AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED May 02 , 1990 , IN BOOK 528
AT PAGE 134 .
PAGE 4
' A L T A C O M M I T M E N T � � '
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions) Application No. V17002
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 201
20. A DEED OF TRUST DATED April 23 , 1990 FROM RONALD L. HUGHES AND VICTORIA
A. HUGHES TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF INDEPENDENCE
ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $66, 000. 00, AND ANY OTHER
AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED May 02 , 1990, IN BOOK 528
AT PAGE 135.
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 202
21. A DEED OF TRUST DATED April 23 , 1990 FROM RONALD L. HUGHES AND VICTORIA
A. HUGHES TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF INDEPENDENCE
ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $65, 600. 00, AND ANY OTHER
AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED May 02 , 1990, IN BOOK 528
AT PAGE 136.
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 204
22 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED March 28 , 1986 FROM RONALD H. RILEY A/K/A R.H. RILEY
TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRSTBANK OF VAIL TO
SECURE THE SUM OF $640, 176. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE
TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED April Ol, 1986, IN BOOK 439 AT PAGE 99 .
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
April Ol, 1986, IN BOOK 439 AT PAGE 100.
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 205
23 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED January 03, 1986 FROM JOAN DARLING SVANOE AND WILLARD
H. SVANOE TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF EMPIRE
SAVINGS BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $60, 000. 00, AND
ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED January 09 ,
1986, IN BOOK 434 AT PAGE 114 .
ADJUSTABLE MORTGAGE LOAN RELEASE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION
WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED October 13 , 1986, IN BOOK 450 AT PAGE
408 .
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 207
24 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED March 31, 1977 FROM JOSEPH A. SHEEHAN, III TO THE
PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRST WESTERN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $19, 600. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE
UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED April 06, 1977 , IN BOOK 253 AT PAGE 892 .
PAGE 5
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T � ', '
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions) Application No. V17002
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION IN
ASSIGNMENT RECORDED May 13 , 1977 , IN BOOK 255 AT PAGE 249 .
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF VERNON IN ASSIGNMENT RECORDED May 23 , 1977 , IN BOOK 255 AT
PAGE 559.
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 208
25. A DEED OF TRUST DATED January 17 , 1974 FROM JOHN KAEMMER TO THE PUBLIC
TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF CHARLES L. BARIBEAU AND ELIZABETH
ANN BARIBEAU TO SECURE THE SUM OF $29 , 226. 66, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE
UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED January 28 , 1974 , IN BOOK 233 AT PAGE
141.
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 220
26. A DEED OF TRUST DATED August 31, 1989 FROM BLANCHE C. HILL TO THE PUBLIC
TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF JACK J. CURTIN-HILL TO SECURE THE
SUM OF $5, 000. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF,
RECORDED October 17 , 1989, IN BOOK 515 AT PAGE 707 .
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 302
27 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED January 15, 1982 FROM CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL TOWNSEND
TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF CHARLES F. GLORE, III
AND SANDRA LONETTE SWETKOVICH TO SECURE THE SUM OF $40, 070. 00, AND ANY
OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED January 29, 1982 ,
IN BOOK 335 AT PAGE 790.
LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS
RECORDED February 04 , 1982 , IN BOOK 336 AT PAGE 70 .
NOTE: AFFECTS UNIT 304
28 . A DEED OF TRUST DATED July 16, 1984 FROM RICHARD E. GEORGI, JR. TO THE
PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF SILVERADO BANKING, SAVINGS &
LOAN ASSOCIATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF $121, 850. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS
PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED August 20, 1984 , IN BOOK 392 AT
PAGE 802 .
NOTE: AFFECTS UNITS 306 AND 308
PAGE 6
- •, , . . • � � , .
, A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions) Application No. V17002
29. A DEED OF TRUST DATED November 17, 1989 FROM MICHAEL D. MILLER AND BARBARA
J. CARPENTER TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRSTBANK
OF VAIL TO SECURE THE SUM OF $356, 250. 00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE
UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED November 22 , 1989, IN BOOK 518 AT PAGE
243 .
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
November 22 , 1989, IN BOOK 518 AT PAGE 244 .
30. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED November 22 , 1989 IN
BOOK 518 AT PAGE 245.
NOTE: ITEMS 29 AND 30 AFFECT UNIT 401
PAGE 7
. ' • � ' • �
EXHIBIT A:
CONDOMINIUM UNIT: OWNER:
100 Riley Vail Corporation, a
Colorado Corporation
101 Colorado Ski Service, Inc. ,
a Colorado Corporation
102 Ronald Riley
103 Karl Hoevelma.nn and Ursula
Hoevelma.nn
101+ J�.mes M. Slevin and Daphne S.
Slevin
105, 106 and 107 Ronald H. Riley, Robert W. Ruder
and Michael .D. Staughton
201, 202 and 204 Ronald L.Hughes and Victoria
A. Hughes
203 Robert Masterson
205 and 207 Ronald H. Riley
206 Arnold Bissegger
208 Mary John Spencer
220 John Kaemmer, Trustee, in trust for
Kathleen Jean Kaemmer and John
Bradley Kaemmer under that
Trust Agreement between Estelle
J. Bolanovich as Grantor and
Julius D. Kaemmer and John
Kaemmer, as trustees,
dated December 13, 1977
301 and 303 Dr. Arnold Bissegger and
Anneliese Bissegger
302 Blanche C. Hill
304 C. Morgan Epes, Jr. and Carolyn
L. E`pes
305 and 307 Jerry Riordan and Maureen
G. Riordan
~ • , � , � �
EXHIBIT A: (cont. ) " '
306 and 308 Richard E. Georgi, Jr. as
trustee of the Richard E.
Georgi, Jr. amended and
restated Revocable Living
Trust under Agreement dated
20 June 1985
309 Arthur C. Cox and Emma Jane Cox
310 H. Hadley Cox and Ruth R. Cox
�+Ol Michael D. Miller and Barbara
J. Carpenter
�+02 Rosslyn Valentine
�► - -�
� 'r' "�'
............::::.
:�::.;:.:��.;:..:::: v.. ..:... ............................................................::..
,...... ,........ ..n...��...ti� .... . .,..... .�...,... ......... ........................................................... ::.:::::;,:...:.::..,;::::::
::::::....:..............:.....,.....::::•....::..::::..... .. ..........:•:::.......w...........................................:;:.;:.;;;:.;;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:.;;:.;:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.;:.::.::•:.::.>:•: ..... ...:.
.............................................,... .. .........................,................. .....:.:...:..... ......
............. ... .........v...t.u 4 .. . . ... ......... ........::................................................................::::::::::::::iiiii:::::::}iiii::::..:..:::iiiii}iiiiii:�iT:�Ti�i:^ii:::Jiiiiii:
:::::�::v.:.:.........:.•n..l.:v :....t . ...�v tv�t\�..........ti...,
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SALES ACTION FORM
ACCOUNT NQ. �TEM ;; �1p. ; COST EA: TOTAL
O1 0000 41330 COM.DEV.APPLICATION FEES ��;�'C� ' s C�'
O1 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS $5.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM BUII.DING CODE $50.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE $36.00
O1 0000 42415 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $32.00
O1 0000 42415 iJNIFORM FIRE CODE $36.00
O1 0000 42415 NATIONAL ELECT'RICAL CODE $30.00
01 0000 42415 OTHER CODE BOOKS
O1 0000 41548 BLUE PRINTS(MYLARS) $7.00
O1 0000 42412 XEROX COPIES/STUDIES $0.25
O1 0000 42371 PENALTY FEES/RE-INSPEC'TIONS
O1 0000 42322 OFF HOURS INSPECTION FEES
O1 0000 41412 CONTRACTORS LICENSES FEES
01 0000 41330 OTHER FEES
O1 0000 41413 SIGN APPLICATION FEE $20.00
O1 0000
� ; �
COMMEI'VTS > � (�'i'1 C��LLJ
` - A
. - w
�h�.� ,c�.� ,�-�rf , ��,� t�� o �
� �
�� � � �
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18 . 66 . 060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on June 24, 1991 at 2 : 00 p.m. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
1 . A request for review of the Vail Streetscape Master Plan for
formal recommendation to the Town Council . The Master Plan
addresses the general area from E . Lionshead Cir. to Ford
Park, and includes W. Meadow Dr. , E . Meadow Dr. , Willow
Bridge Rd. , Gore Creek Dr. , Vail Valley Dr. , Bridge St . , and
Hanson Ranch Rd.
Applicant : Town of Vail
Planner: Mike Mollica
2 . A request for a front setback variance for the Schofield
residence, Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley lst Filing/1448 Vail
Valley Drive .
Applicant : John Schofield
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3 . Discussion of site selection for the Municipal Complex-
Worksession
Town Staff: Ken Hughey, Kristan Pritz, Mike Mollica
4 . A request for a Special Development District . A part of the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 1, Township 53, Range 81,
West 6th Prime Meridian .
Applicant : Abe L. Shapiro
Planner : Mike Mollica
5 . A request for a front setback variance for the Dick
Residence, Unit 2, Tract A, Bighorn Townhouses/4708 Meadow
Drive, #2A.
Applicant : Carol Dick
Planner : Jill Kammerer
6 . A request for a worksession for height, parking and density
(GRFA/common area) variances for the Sonnenalp, Part of Lots
K & L, Block 5-E, Vail Village, lst Filing/20 Vail Road.
Applicant : Sonnenalp Properties
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
7 . A request for a conditional use permit in order to construct "
a snow dump on the property generally located west of the
Town of Vail Shops . The property is more specifically
described as follows :
That part of the North 1/2 of Section 8, Township 5 South,
Range 80 west of the 6th Principal Meridian, Eagle County,
Colorado, lying north of Interstate Highway No. 70 and being
more particularly described as follows :
Beginning at the NE corner of said Section 8; thence along
1���� � 7-�/
��
� . .
� � w
the northerly line of said Section 8, S89 46' 27"W a distance
of 1500 . 00 ft; thence departing the northerly line of said
Section 8, S00 23' 03"W a distance of 529 . 86 ft to a point on
the northerly ROW line of I-70; thence along the northerly
ROW line of I-70 following two courses :
1) S75 28' 18"E a distance of 180 . 82 ft to a point of
curvature;
2) 1327 . 90 ft along the arc of a curve to the left, having
a radius of 5580 . 00 ft, a central angle of 13 38' 04"
and a chord which bears N89 36' 34"E 1324 .70 ft distance
to a point on the easterly line of said Section 8;
Thence departing said ROW line of I-70 N00 23' 03"E along the
easterly line of said Section 8, a distance of 572 . 10 ft to
the point of beginning, containing 20 . 480 acres more or
less .
The above description is based on the Town of Vail
annexation plats for the property described and is not based
on a field survey . The basis of bearing for the above
parcel is the northerly line of Section 8 being S89 46' 27"W
as shown on said annexation plats .
Applicants : Town of Vail/vail Associates
Planner : Andy Knudtsen
8 . A request for a front setback variance for a garage for the
Oberlohr residence, Lot 3, Block 3, Vail Ridge
Subdivision/2656 Davos Trail .
Applicant : Konrad Oberlohr
Planner : Shelly Mello
� 9 . A determination for a 60 or 90 day review period for an
exterior alteration for the Golden Peak House, Lots A & B,
Block 2, Vail Village lst Filing/278 Hanson Ranch Road.
Applicants : Golden Peak House Condo . Association; Vail
Associates; GPH Partners, Ltd. ; and Margaritaville, Inc .
Planner: Mike Mollica
10 . A request for a side setback variance for the Heiman
Residence, Lot 9, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision/5134
Grouse Lane .
Applicant : Mr . and Mrs . Paul Heiman
Planner: Jill Kammerer
Any items tabled from the June 10, 1991 PEC meeting agenda .
The applications and information about the proposals are
available for public review in the Community Development
Department office .
Town of Vail
Community Development Department
Published in the Vail Trail on June 8, 1991 .
� . �.
Linda J. Craddock K.H. Chester � Rich Phelps
P.O. Box 2929 � P.O. Box 8243 U.S. Forest Service
Colorado Springs, CO 80901-2929 Rocky Mount, NC 27804-1234 P.O. Box 190
Minturn, CO 81645
Howard P. and Judith Berkowitz Kindelco, Inc. Margretta Parks
888 7th Avenue c/o Christiania Lodge P.O. Box 37312
New York, NY 10106 356 E. Hanson Ranch Road Denver, CO 80237
Vail, CO 81657
Paul C. Wolf Edwin Whitehead Oscar Tang
505 South Flagler Drive 15 Valley Drive 100 Park Avenue
11th Floor Greenwich, CT 06830 New York, NY 10017
West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3475
Jerome and Martha Lewis Robert and Diane Lazier Charles Rosenquist
410 17th Street P.O. Box 627 P.O. Box 686
Suite 1600 Vail, CO 81658 Vail, CO 81658
Denver, CO 80202
W. Grant Williams Blanche C. Hill Richard Brown
#2 Ladue Lane 311 Bridge Street 1780 South Bellaire
St. Louis, MO 63124 Vail, CO 81657 Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Barbara M. Osborne Town of Vail Jeff Selby
c/o Keith S. Jennings 535 16th Street, #600
1531 Walnut Street Denver, CO 80202
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Jay A. Precourt Vail Associates
1560 Broadway P.O. Box 7
Suite 2000 Vail, CO 81658
Denver, CO 80202
� �'Lco ,��Uim.- �Q.u-.r� "G��,G Q.c,cJl !k�C� _
G� � � �
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental
Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18 . 66 . 060 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on June 24, 1991 at 2 : 00 p.m. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
1 . A request for review of the Vail Streetscape Master Plan for
formal recommendation to the Town Council . The Master Plan
addresses the general area from E. Lionshead Cir. to Ford
Park, and includes W. Meadow Dr. , E . Meadow Dr. , Willow
Bridge Rd. , Gore Creek Dr. , Vail Valley Dr. , Bridge St . , and
Hanson Ranch Rd.
Applicant : Town of Vail
Planner: Mike Mollica
2 . A request for a front setback variance for the Schofield
residence, Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley lst Filing/1448 Vail
Valley Drive .
Applicant : John Schofield
Planner : Andy Knudtsen
3 . Discussion of site selection for the Municipal Complex-
Worksession
Town Staff: Ken Hughey, Kristan Pritz, Mike Mollica
4 . A request for a Special Development District . A part of the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 1, Township 53, Range 81,
West 6th Prime Meridian.
Applicant : Abe L. Shapiro
Planner : Mike Mollica
5 . A request for a front setback variance for the Dick
Residence, Unit 2, Tract A, Bighorn Townhouses/4708 Meadow
Drive, #2A.
Applicant : Carol Dick
Planner : Jill Kammerer
6 . A request for a worksession for height, parking and density
(GRFA/common area) variances for the Sonnenalp, Part of Lots
K & L, Block 5-E, Vail Village, lst Filing/20 Vail Road.
Applicant : Sonnenalp Properties
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
7 . A request for a conditional use permit in order to construct "
a snow dump on the property generally located west of the
Town of Vail Shops . The property is more specifically
described as follows :
That part of the North 1/2 of Section 8, Township 5 South,
Range 80 west of the 6th Principal Meridian, Eagle County,
Colorado, lying north of Interstate Highway No. 70 and being
more particularly described as follows :
Beginning at the NE corner of said Secr_i�n 8; thence along
Town of Vail
� � .� .
the northerly line of said Section 8, S89 46' 27"W a distance
of 1500 . 00 ft; thence departing the northerly line of said
Section 8, S00 23' 03"W a distance of 529 . 86 ft to a point on
the northerly ROW line of I-70; thence along the northerly
ROW line of I-70 following two courses :
1) S75 28' 18"E a distance of 180 . 82 ft to a point of
curvature;
2) 1327 . 90 ft along the arc of a curve to the left, having
a radius of 5580 . 00 ft, a central angle of 13 38' 04"
and a chord which bears N89 36' 34"E 1324 .70 ft distance
to a point on the easterly line of said Section 8;
Thence departing said ROw line of I-70 N00 23' 03"E along the
easterly line of said Section 8, a distance of 572 . 10 ft to
the point of beginning, containing 20 . 480 acres more or
less .
The above description is based on the Town of Vail
annexation plats for the property described and is not based
on a field survey. The basis of bearing for the above
parcel is the northerly line of Section 8 being S89 46' 27"W
as shown on said annexation plats .
Applicants : Town of Vail/Vail Associates
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
8 . A request for a front setback variance for a garage for the
Oberlohr residence, Lot 3, Block 3, Vail Ridge
Subdivision/2656 Davos Trail .
Applicant : Konrad Oberlohr
Planner: Shelly Mello
� 9 . A determination for a 60 or 90 day review period for an
exterior alteration for the Golden Peak House, Lots A & B,
Block 2, Vail Village lst Filing/278 Hanson Ranch Road.
Applicants : Golden Peak House Condo . Association; Vail
Associates; GPH Partners, Ltd. ; and Margaritaville, Inc .
Planner: Mike Mollica
10 . A request for a side setback variance for the Heiman
Residence, Lot 9, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision/5134
Grouse Lane .
Applicant : Mr. and Mrs . Paul Heiman
Planner: Jill Kammerer
Any items tabled from the June 10, 1991 PEC meeting agenda.
The applications and information about the proposals are
available for public review in the Community Development
Department office .
Town of Vail
Community Development Department
Published in the Vail Trail on June 8, 1991 .
. ' � �
� �
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
GOLDEN PEAK HOUSE, VAIL COLORADO
Block 1, Vail Village First Filing
LOt ls
Linda J. Craddock
Box 2929
Colorado Springs, CO 80901-2929
Lot 2 :
Howard P. and Judith Berkowitz �
888 7th Avenue
New York, NY 10106
Lot 3 :
Paul C. Wolf
505 South Flagler Drive
llth Floor
West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3475
Jerome & Martha Lewis
410 17th Street
Suite 1600
Denver, CO 80202
Lot 7 :
W. Grant Williams
#2 Ladue Lane
St. Louis, MO 63124
Lot 13:
Barbara M. Osborne
c/o Keith S . Jennings
1531 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Lot 4:
Jay A. Precourt
1560 Broadway
Suite 2000
Denver, CO 80202
Lot 19:
K. H. Chester
P.O. Box 8243
Rocky Mount, NC 27804-1234
�
.. i ' � � �
Page 2
A part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
(Christiania)
Kindelco, Inc .
c/o Christiania Lodge
356 E. Hanson Ranch Road
Vail, CO 81657
Part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
Edwin Whitehead
15 Valley Drive
Greenwich, CT 06830
Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village First Filin�
(Tivoli Lodge)
Robert and Diane Lazier
Box 627
Vail, CO 81658
A part of Lot A, Block 5C, Vail Village First Filing
(Hill Building)
Blanche C. Hill
311 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657 �
Lot D1, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
(Town of Vail)
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Tract E and F:
Vail Associates , Inc .
Joe Macy
Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
Parcel C:
U. S . Forest Service
P.O. Box 190
Minturn, CO 81645
r � �
�, Page 3
Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village Fifth Filing
(Cyranos Building)
Margretta Parks
P.O. Box 37312
Denver, CO 80237
Lot H, Block 5A, Vail Village First Filing
(Red Lion Building)
Oscar Tang
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Charles Rosenquist
P.O. Box 686
Vail, CO 81657
Richard Brown
1780 South Bellaire
Suite 106
Denver, CO 80222
Jeff Selby
535 16th Street
#600
Denver, CO 80202
r