HomeMy WebLinkAboutVista Bahn Building Common Area 4FILE COPY
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Monday, January 11, 1999
FINAL AGENDA
Proiect Orientation / LUNCH - Community Development Department
MEMBERS PRESENT
Greg Moffet
John Schofield
Galen Aasland
Ann Bishop
Brian Doyon
Tom Weber
Site Visits
1. Vail Plaza Hotel —100 E. Meadow Drive
2. Vail Village Club — 333 Bridge Street
Driver: George
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearing - Town Council Chambers
11:00 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
A request for a Type II Employee Housing Unit at a proposed primary/secondary
residence, located at 95 Forest Road / Lot 32, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Philip Hoversten, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Planner: Jeff Hunt
MOTION: Ann Bishop SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 6 -0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Type II
EHU deed restriction to the Town of Vail Department of Community
Development. This document will be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and
Recorder's Office and will require that the employee housing unit be permanently
restricted for employee housing.
MEMBERS ABSENT
Diane Golden
TOR 4VAIL
2. A request for a variance from Section 12- 713-13, Town of Municipal Code, to allow for the
conversion of existing floor space to gross residential floor area (GRFA), located at 333
Bridge Street (Vail Village Club)/ A portion of Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: The Remonov Company, represented by Braun & Associates
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 4 -2
DENIED
3. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District #4 (Cascade Village),
to allow for a fractional fee club and a change to the approved Development Plan,
located at 1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominium Cascade Village Area A.
Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Brian Doyon VOTE: 6 -0
APPROVED FOR RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL WITH 11 CONDITIONS:
1. That the applicant submit a detailed contractor's cost estimate identifying the
costs necessary to relocate the existing overhead utility line along the applicant's
north property line underground, and that the applicant establish a financial bond
with the Town of Vail in the sum of 125% of the said relocating costs to insure
the undergrounding of the utility line.
2. That the applicant regrade and revegetate the knoll located at the northwest
corner of the development site at the time of the final grading of the Westhaven
Club & Lodge. Due to the exposure and aspect of the hillside, the knoll shall be
regrading to slopes not exceeding 3:1. The regrading shall be reviewed and
approved by the Town Engineer.
3. That the applicant provide Type III Employee Housing Unit deed - restrictions ,
which comply with the Town of Vail Employee Housing Requirements (Title 12,
Chapter 13, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code) for each of the 21 employee
housing units, and that said deed - restricted housing be made available for
occupancy, and that the deed restrictions be recorded at the Office of the Eagle
County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy for the Westhaven Club & Lodge.
4. That the applicant submit detailed civil engineering drawings of the required off -
site improvements (street lights, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, grading,
etc.) to the Town of Vail Public Works Department for review and approval prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
5. That the applicant record a twenty foot (20') wide pedestrian /bike easement for
that portion of pedestrian /bike path traversing the applicant's property and as
identified on the Topographic Map prepared by Intermountain Engineering Ltd.,
dated 12/22/94, and that said easement be recorded at the Office of the Eagle
County Clerk & Recorder, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The exact
location and language of the easement shall be reviewed and approved by the
Town Attorney and Town Engineer prior to recordation.
2
6. That the applicant provide written documentation from the Public Service
Company granting approval of the construction of the Westhaven Club & Lodge in
the location identified on the site plan relative to the high pressure gas line.
Written approval shall be granted prior to the issuance of a building permit.
7. That the applicant record an access easement along the east property line for that
portion of the driveway and access and trash enclosure which encroaches upon
the adjoining property and that said easement be recorded at the Office of the
Eagle County Clerk Recorder. The exact location and language of the easement
shall be reviewed and approved by the Town Attorney and Town Engineer prior to
recordation.
8. That the applicant pay -in -lieu on spaces not provided on site above the 52 spaces
proposed.
9. That the final landscape plan and architectural elevations be reviewed and
approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board.
10. That the approval of this major amendment to Special Development District #4
shall become lapsed and void one year from the date of a second reading of an
ordinance amending the district, and that should the approval lapse, the applicant
shall be required to remove the "ruins" and restore and revegetate the site by no
later than October 31, 1999. A bond providing financial security to ensure that
said removal occurs shall be required following second reading of an amending
ordinance. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to provide a cost estimate of
the removal work. The bond shall be a minimum of 125% of the removal costs.
11. That the applicant revise and submit an amended site plan, landscape plan, and
grading plan indicating improvements to the existing boulder retaining wall along
the east side of the access driveway. Each of the plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Town staff and the Design Review Board.
4. A worksession to discuss a major amendment to Special Development District #4
(Cascade Village), to revise the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000
S. Frontage Road West/Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
WORKSESSION — NO VOTE
5. A request for a final review of a major amendment to Special Development District #6,
Vail Village Inn, to allow for a hotel redevelopment, located at 100 East Meadow Drive,
Lots M and O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay Peterson
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 6 -0
APPROVED WITH 10 CONDITIONS:
1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application
for the hotel:
a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan;
b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;
C. A Stormwater Management Plan;
d. A Site Dewatering Plan; and
e. A Traffic Control Plan.
2. That the applicant provide deed - restricted housing, which complies with the Town
of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12 -13), for a minimum of 160
employees, and that said deed - restricted housing be made available for
occupancy, and the deed restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk &
Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Vail
Plaza Hotel. The ratio of units required shall be reduced to 2:1 for units provided
in Town versis units provided down valley.
3. That the applicant receive a conditional use permit to allow for the operation of a
fractional fee club, in accordance with Chapter 12 -16, prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
4 vcard - .
MIn
fa�ade
6. That the applicant receive final Design Review Board approval for the proposed
off -site improvement, prior to application for a building permit.
7. That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineer drawings of all the off -
site improvements, including improvements to the South Frontage Road, for
review and Town approval, prior to application for a building permit.
8. That the applicant submit complete set of plans to the Colorado Department of
Transportation for review and approval of an access permit, prior to application for
a building permit.
9. That the applicant explore alternatives to decreasing the depth of the enclosed
main loading /delivery area to reduce the impact of the Vail Plaza Hotel at the
ground level of the building on the adjoining property to the east. The final
change shall be at the discretion of the DRB.
10. That the applicant meet with the Town Staff to prepare a letter of agreement
outlining the requirements of the off -site improvements, prior to second reading of
an ordinance approving.
11. That one, on -site employee housing unit be provided as a manager's type of unit.
12. That additional architectural articulation be provided on all north and south levels.
M
6. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed arena expansion at the Dobson Ice
Arena, located at 321 East Lionshead Circle / Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Odell Architects
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 25, 1999
7. A request to amend the Town's "Public Accommodation" Zone District, Chapter 7 and
amendments to Chapter 15, Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA), Town of Vail
Municipal Code.
Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc..
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 25, 1999
8. Information Update
9. Approval of December 28, 1998 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479 -2356, Telephone for the
Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: January 11, 1999
SUBJECT: A request for a variance from Section 12- 7B -13, Town of Vail Municipal
Code, to allow for the conversion of existing floor space to gross
residential floor area (GRFA), located at 333 Bridge Street (Vail Village
Club)/ A portion of Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: The Remonov Company, represented by Braun & Associates
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
DESCRIPTIO OF THE REQUEST AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is seeking relief from the density control section of the Commercial Core 1 (CC1)
zone district in order to allow GRFA in excess of that permitted. The property is allowed 3,716
sq. ft. of GRFA (80% of buildable area). The applicant is proposing an additional 402 sq. ft. of
GRFA in order to convert the 3 and 4`" stories of the building from a private club to a single
dwelling unit. The applicant is not proposing to expand any floor area of the building but simply
convert the use of the space.
The applicant has provided an analysis of the previous approvals for this property, which is
attached. The original plan for this building was to have a portion of the 3 floor as office s�ace
and the remainder of that floor and the 4 floor as a dwelling unit. Since a portion of the 3` floor
was office space, the dwelling unit complied with the GRFA limitations, as there is no limitation
on commercial floor area in the CC1 zone district. Subsequent to that approval, the previous
owner obtained approval for a quasi - public club on the 3 and 4`" floors, which was constructed.
The applicant states that the existing interior building configuration creates an unnecessary
physical hardship and a practical difficulty creating the need for this variance (see applicant's
statement).
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors
Upon review of Section 12 -17 -6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Criteria and
Findings, the Community Development Department recommends denial of the
requested GRFA variance based on the following factors:
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
.h
TOWN OF VAIL
While the request will have no external or physical impacts on other
existing or potential uses in the vicinity, approval of such a variance could
be precedent setting, by allowing the interior configuration of floor area to
be an argument for GRFA variances on other properties in the area. The
applicant contends that other uses allowed by conditional use permit (such
as a professional office) are not viable on the 3 floor of the building and
the only use which will be successful is a residential dwelling. Staff's
concern here is that if this is approved, other properties in Town with 3rd
floor office space (i.e., Crossroads) could point to this approval to allow
conversion of non - residential spaces to residential uses without regard to
GRFA limitations.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without a grant of special privilege.
The applicant is seeking the minimum relief necessary to allow the use of
the 3` and 4 I floors of this building, in its existing configuration, as a
residential dwelling unit. The applicant points to the existing building as
providing a physical hardship. Staff is unaware of any instance where the
interior layout of a building has been determined by the PEC to create a
physical hardship, thus justifying a GRFA variance. As the applicant
points out there are remedies to this situation. An office could be provided
in a portion of the space, common storage areas could be created, and
floor area could be removed creating "open to below" area on the 4th floor.
Existing buildings have been determined to be a physical hardship in other
areas justifying the approval of setback variances and site coverage
variances. These have tended to be sites that are currently
nonconforming, were constructed under Eagle County Zoning, or in areas
where zoning requirements changed over the years, creating unique
circumstances. This building was constructed over the past several years
under the current CC1 regulations.
While staff recognizes the "reasonableness" and the minor impact of the
applicant's request, staff believes the approval of this variance will be a
grant of special privilege as a physical hardship or practical difficulty
cannot be found to exist on the property and that any unique
circumstances which might exist on the property are self imposed.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will have little, if any, effect on these issues. The proposal
will reduce parking and traffic impacts associated with the approved club
use.
B. Th Planning and Environmental Commission shall m ake the following
2
findings before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply
generally to other properties in the same zone.
C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends denial of the proposed variance, subject
to the following findings:
1. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
2. That the strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation will not
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
same district.
FAEVE RYON E\P EC\M EMOS \99 \vvclub
3
VISTA BAHN BUILDING
VARIANCE REQUEST
December 14, 1998 (revised 12/21/98)
A. Summary of Variance Request
The purpose of the requested variance is for the Vista Bahn Building (formerly known as the
Vail Village Club Building) located on Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing, to obtain relief
from Section 12- 713-13, Density Control, of the Vail Municipal Code. The applicant is the
Remonov Company.
This variance request will allow the Vista Bahn Building to exceed the allowable Gross
Residential Floor Area (GRFA) permitted by the density control section of the Commercial Core
I Zone District. As proposed, the excess GRFA will be established by converting existing "non-
residential" square footage on the third and fourth floor of the building to GRFA. The proposed
variance does not involve any exterior modifications that will increase the height, size or bulk
and mass of the existing building. If approved, this variance request would nullify the existing
conditional use permit for a "quasi- public club" on the third and fourth floors of the building.
B. History of the Building /Existing Zoning
The following summarizes the recent history of the Vista Bahn Building:
Spring, 1995
Town Planning and Environmental Commission approves a number of applications that facilitate
the re- development of the building. The "building program" approved by the Town included:
• Commercial uses in basement level
• Retail on first floor
• Restaurant on second floor
• Office space and residential condominium on third floor
• Residential condominium on fourth floor
Approvals for this building included a conditional use permit for approximately 695 square feet
of office space on the third floor of the building. The residential condominium was within the
allowable GRFA for the property.
Fall. 1995
Prior to construction of the building, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use
permit for a "quasi- public club" to be located on the third and fourth floors of the building. This
approval essentially "voided" the previously approved conditional use permit for the third floor
office space. With this change in use, the design of the building became a "single -use design ".
The implications of this change are discussed in greater detail below.
1996 -1997
Building construction occurs.
1998
The Vail Village Club fails and with it the developers of the project lose ownership of the
property. Bob Hernreich and Rick Mueller of the Remonov Company obtain ownership of the
property.
C. Variance Proposal
The Remonov's immediate goal for the property is to establish viable uses for the building that
are consistent with the permitted uses in the Commercial Core I zone district (CCI) and the
mixed -use character of Vail Village. Remonov intends to maintain commercial uses on the first
and second floors of the building and proposes to utilize the third and fourth floors for a
residential condominium. Contrary to the objectives of the original developer, Remonov does
not believe office space on the third floor is a viable use for the property. The recent failure of
the Vail Village Club would indicate that a club -type use is not a viable use for the third and
fourth floors. Residential use on the third and fourth floors is also consistent with existing
zoning for the property. In fact, the only permitted uses for levels above the second floor of a
buildins4 in CCI are lods4es and residential dwelling units
Alternative uses for the third and fourth floor are fairly limited by CCI zoning and by the design
of the building. Designed as a single -use building, emergency egress to the fourth floor is
dependent upon internal access through the third floor. As such, unless a new egress point to and
from the fourth floor can be added to the building (a difficult, if not impossible proposition), the
internal circulation between the third and fourth floor must be maintained. This egress situation
has in large part dictated the applicant's proposal to establish one condominium unit within these
two floors of the building.
The GRFA variance is necessary because the existing square footage of the third and fourth
floors exceeds the GRFA permitted on the property. The following summarizes the allowable
and proposed GRFA for the building:
Site Area - 4,646 square feet
Allowable GRFA (80 %) - 3,716 square feet
Existing square footage of 3 rd and 4 th floors - 4.118 square feet
Proposed GRFA Excess - 402 square feet
While the existing building was constructed as approved by the Town, previously proposed uses
for the building and the uses permitted by the CCI zone district have created a dilemma for how
the third and fourth floors can be used. By zoning, the only permitted uses for the third and
fourth floor are lodges and residential dwelling units. However, converting the third and fourth
floors to residential in presently not possible because the existing square footage of these two
floors exceeds the allowable GRFA by 529 square feet. Regardless of the fact that the
conversion of this existing space will be accomplished with no exterior changes to the building
that would increase the height, size or bulk and mass of the existing building, a GRFA variance
is technically necessary in order to facilitate this conversion.
Prior to submitting this variance request, a variety of other alternatives for resolving this
situation were first considered:
Reduce GRFA by removing floor area
GRFA could be removed by physically removing a portion of the existing building.
Given that the bulk and mass of the building has been approved by the Town, this
alternative is far too extreme to be considered viable.
2. Propose an SDD
The entire building was developed without the need for an SDD. To propose an SDD
for a project that will not even involve physical expansion of the existing building
does not seem to the be most expeditious alternative.
3. Increase Parcel Size
Increasing the parcel size will increase the allowable GRFA. While technically
possible, this alternative was eliminated due to potential issues and complications
with the obtaining additional property and subdividing and re- zoning the parcels.
4. Reduce the GRFA on the 3 rd /4 Floors by changing uses
GRFA could be eliminated by introducing some other use to the third or fourth floors
in a manner similar to the third floor office space proposed by the original developer.
However, this would require approval of a conditional use permit and Remonov
believes third floor office space is not a viable use for the building. Concern over the
viability of third floor office space was also raised by the Planning Commission
during the 1995 review of the original development proposal.
After careful consideration of the alternatives outlined above, the variance process was selected
as the most appropriate mechanism for resolving this situation. As outlined in the following
section, a variance is an appropriate process given the very unique situation with this property
and the extreme hardship and practical difficulty that would result from strict and literal
compliance with the zoning regulations.
D. Variance Criteria /PEC Findings
The following summarizes compliance of the proposal with applicable review criteria and PEC
Findings necessary to approve a variance.
Consideration of Factors
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
The proposed variance will not increase the height, size or bulk and mass of the existing
building and as such, will have no affect on existing or potential structures. The proposed
use is consistent with permitted uses for the CCI district and is consistent with uses on
surrounding properties.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege.
The "degree of relief' from the GRFA regulations is limited to only the existing square
footage in the building — no additional square footage is proposed for the building. Approval
of this variance request will allow for resolution of a very unique situation and in doing so
further the objectives of the zoning title by establishing a use on the third and fourth floors
that is consistent with the permitted uses in the CCI zone district.
The existing building in itself presents a significant physical hardship for the applicants. The
design of the building which contemplated a single -use further complicates the conversion of
this space. Due to other variances that have been approved in and around the Village Core
over the years, approval of this variance would not be a grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will not increase the existing height, size and bulk and mass of the building. As
such, the variance request will have no adverse affect on the above considerations. Approval
of the variance will facilitate the conversion of this space from a quasi - public club to
residential. This change in use will dramatically reduce the parking demand on the Vail
Village Parking Structure.
PEC Findines
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
The variance request complies with Finding 1. Previously approved variances in and around
the vicinity of the subject property is typically considered the "test" for whether approval of a
variance would constitute a grant of special privilege. In this case, a site coverage variance
approved during the re- development of the adjacent Red Lion Building presents a good
example of why this proposal would not be a grant of special privilege. As indicated in the
March 13, 1995 staff memo regarding the original review of the Vail Village Club, the Red
Lion site coverage variance was "warranted" in part because it was related to conditions
associated with an existing building and not new construction — the inference being that
conformance with all applicable development standards can be more difficult when dealing
with an existing building than it is in dealing with new construction on a vacant site.
In the case of this application, the existing Vista Bahn Building constitutes a physical
hardship. Because existing floor area on the third and fourth floors exceeds allowable
GRFA, this space cannot be used in accordance the permitted uses of the CCI zone district
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
The variance request complies with Finding 2. The proposal involves no changes to the
existing height, size and bulk and mass of the building and as such will not be detrimental or
injurious to properties in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the
same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
The requested variance complies with Findings 3. A. As outlined above, the GRFA
regulation could be complied with by physically removing a portion of the third or fourth
floors — an alternative that would present an extreme practical difficulty and an unnecessary
physical hardship on the land owner. Another alternative for conforming with the GRFA
regulation would be to introduce a different use, such as the previously proposed office use,
on a portion of the third or fourth floors. While office use was approved for the third floor by
the PEC in 1995, a number of PEC members expressed significant reservations about the
viability of third floor office space and the applicant shares these concerns. This concern is
further supported by the lack of precedent for third floor office or commercial space within
the Village area. To pursue office use or some other conditional use for the third or fourth
floors could in theory remedy the GRFA situation. However, this alternative would create a
hardship for the applicant by "condemning" the building to a use that is not viable and
destine to fail.
The requested variance complies with Finding 3. B. The presence of the existing building
and the "ill- fated" saga of previously proposed and ultimately failed uses for the property
represent a set of extraordinary circumstances or conditions that would not apply generally to
other properties in the district.
E. Summary
The goal of the Remonov Company is to "pick up the pieces" of this project by establishing uses
that are both viable and consistent with the development objectives of the CCI zone district. The
introduction of residential use on the third and fourth floors is a big step in this effort. The
viability of residential uses in the core area is well - established and such a use is also consistent
with the "horizontal zoning" and mixed use character desired for the core area.
The propose variance will not change the exterior appearance of the building in any material
way. It will, however, allow the new owners of the property to move beyond the building's
troubled past and establish uses that will work for the building and work for the Town by
establishing a mixed use building in the Village Core.
Jan -05 -99 11 :35A
970 479 2409
MBA !/ BII,/1 L.Ii N ASS _ I II II S. i1
F'I.Ardriir4! _ i.l c.c*ir ur.ir i (w-vi i or - ri
January 5, 1999
I)ominic Mauriello, Director of Planning
Town of Vail, I)epartnient of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Rh: Vista Bahn Building
Dear Dominic:
1 spent sonic time yesterday reviewing staff memos and PEC minutes of other variance requests
from the past year. One thin, is clear from this review, and that is the staff and PEC have used a
lair amount of latitude in terms of how variance requests are evaluated. I do not say this to be
critical, the application of variance criteria inherently involves (as it should) some latitude and
room for interpretation. If you cut through the questions of "special privilege ", the "hardship
and the "impacts ", bottom line is whether the proposal makes sense Once; this underlying
determination is made, (valuation of the variance criteria can he made to "fit" the decision of
whether to approve or deny.
With regard to the Vista Bahn Building, one thing I assume we agree on is that the proposal will
have no negative imp acts on uses or structures to the vicinity. T hat said, the key questions seem
to he whether the literal enforcement of the regulation would result in a "practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship" inconsistent with the code whether approval of the variance
would be a grant of "special privilege ".
In order to evaluate these factors, one must understand how the ternis "special privilcbc" and
"hardship" have been interpreted_
Special Privag"
This was interesting. The site coverage variances for the A &1) Building, (Golden Bear)
and the Slifer Building both stated the variances would not he a grant of special privilege
because the projects would implement/furlhcr the goals ofthe toaster plan and Urban
Design Guide Plan (the correlation of these factors could certainly be debated). On the
other hand, setback variances for Willow Place and the l.ionshead hin stated the requests
would not he a grant of special privilege because there arc similar encroachments on
other properties in the vicinity.
In applying the "presence of "similar encroachments in the vicinity" interpretation to the
Vista Bahn Building, the CTRFA variance would not be a grant of special privilege
because there are examples of properties al the vicinity that exceed GRFA, Bascd
Mintuin Irunwc;rk Ruddu.,
POSt C) I I i� c: Rnx / /!.
Mird.rrn. Col rado 8h-15
Phon (:. 9/0107W'37
r:ix ` 7:>.827�50/
�n-w.v.l:ri,iuri,c.:,rn i,�!c••:.rtvr•�
P_02
�%,
,
Jan -05 -99 11:35A 970 479 2409 P.03
on data in the Vail Village Master PIan, the Golden Teak House (prior to the SDD
approval and redevelopment.), the Lodge Tower, the S1txmark and the Mill C.rcek Court
Building all exceed allowable GRf'A. Just down the street the Tivoli obtained variance
approval to exceed allowable GRIA.
Physical Hardshiy
Physical hardship has been interpreted to mean both existing natural conditions such as a
(loodplain (Pepi's) and the presence of existing buildings or improvements. The stall's
review of the Golden Bear variance acknowledged "re- design is possible . it is not
practical to do so . the design and constniction of the existinz building is not
conducive to substantial changes "_ There are many other variances that site the presence
of an existing, building as justification for satisfying; hardship criteria.
The design and construction of the existing Vista Icahn 1uiIding is a physical hardship.
Just as with the Golden Rear, re- design is possible. The third floor of the Vista Balttt
Building; could be modified to remove GRFA. However, it is riot the practical thing to do
and it would impose an unnecessary physical hardship on the applicant - simply stated,
re- design is a solution that just does not make sense.
Another consideration I would ask you to keep in mind is that the variance process makes no
distinction between the type of"va.rianee. Density, site coverage, setbacks it should not matter.
In conversations yesterday, both you and George inli;rrcd that a G R FA variance is somehow
different from other types of variances. While I understand what you are saying, there is no
basis for this perspective in the variance process. The conformance with criteria is what matters.
With few exceptions, i helieve one could evaluate virtually any variance request and interpret
criteria such to conclude that the variance is not warranted. There are always other design
solutions that could be pursued and there is always the alternative of doing a lesser project or no
project at all. The variance process is in place to allow for exceptions to dcvclopment standards
when they make sense. We believe this application does make sense and that the staff and PFC
have the latitude to approve this request in order to resolve a very unique and difficult situation.
in this case, given the consideration of all the factors, the strict interpretation of the code will
serve no public: purpose.
Thank you again tier your time and consideration in reviewing this application.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Braun, AlC T
Cc hick Mucllcr
E IAA II/ BRAUN ASSOCIATES, IINC.
PLANNING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Dominic Mauriello
FROM:
Tom Braun
DATE:
December 20, 1998
RE:
Vista Balm Building
Thank you for the time to meet last week to discuss the variance application for the Vista Bahn
Building (formerly the Vail Village Club Building). Enclosed are two copies of our revised
narrative which summarizes this proposal. Revisions include a few minor points pertaining to
the proposal's compliance with applicable variance criteria. The most substantive change is with
respect to the GRFA proposed by this application.
Based on your input regarding areas to be excluded from calculation as GRFA, I had the
surveyors working on the condominium plat provide me with revised GRFA numbers. The
extent of the GRFA variance is now 402 square feet as opposed to the 529 square feet indicated
in our original proposal. The numbers break down as follows:
2,941 sq. ft. on the P floor (this number excludes the two common stairwells and the common
elevator, mechanical and dumbwaiter shafts)
1,177 sq. ft. on the 4th floor (this number excludes the one common stairwell and the common
elevator, mechanical and dumbwaiter shafts)
4,118 sq. ft. of total GRFA
3,716 sq. ft. allowable GRFA
402 sq. ft. excess GFRA
I hope this is helpful. I will contact you after the holidays to discuss this application in greater
detail. Merry Christmas!
Minturn Ironworks Building Phone - 970.827.5797
201 Main Street, 2nd Floor Fax - 970.827.5507
Post Office Box 776 www.braunassociates.com
Minturn, Colorado 81645
0
0 BA II/ BRAUN ASSOCIATES, IINC.
PLANNING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
December 14, 1998
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Village Club Building
Dear George:
Enclosed you will find a variance application for the Vail Village Club Building. This
application includes the following information:
1. Variance application form,
2. Filing fee,
3. Written statement summarizing the proposed variance (two copies).
4. Building floor plans (two copies),
5. Title report, and
6. List of adjacent property owners.
Based on the Town's Planning and Environmental Commission schedule, this item will be
considered by the Commission at their January 11 meeting. Please lei..: me know if there is
anything else I can provide for you in order to facilitate the review of this application. I look
forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
I
Thomas A. Braun, AICP
CC: Rick Mueller
Encl.
Minturn Ironworks Building Phone - 970.827.5797
201 Main Street, 2nd Floor Fax - 970.827.5507
Post Office Box 776 www.braunassociates.com
Minturn, Colorado 81645
Dec -09 -9B 01:27P 970 479 2409 P.02
MOV -24 -$9 00.41 FKU" KUV -VU YtV - uca- a. ■v oir.rac,- ^"� ' °' '
APPLICA'T'ION FOR PL..ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION APPROVAL.
d .
TOD wN OF V 11L
This application is for my pmjea rapud approwd by the P loing and Enmmnmend CmwT iision. For tpociftc
infotzntaio& see the sibmittat taluimneats for the puUCWV appmvai that is requcstod. Tbc application czm z6 be
amepwd until all rcgWttd mfomwdon is subrcntted. The project aW also need to be mviewed by the Town Council
andtor the Design Review Board.
A:
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
[Z Addibonal GRFA (250)
CI Amendment to an ApproVed Development Plan
O Bed and Brcalfast
O Ernploym Housing Unit (Types __J
O Conditional Use Pc=t
❑ Major or 0 Mkm CCI Exterior Alteration
O Major or O Minor Subdivision
O M�
0 Rezoning
Q Major a ExtaiorAlt�stiott
0 Sign variance
(Liansheud)
19 Vatimce
0 Special Develop District
O Zoning Code Amendment
0 Major or 0 Minor Ammdmcnt to an SDD
B.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: kj
p, t (. G.- -0 � 2 -1 �1 -1} 1J e m.'1 - �1
CJkC Ca nyen'c
11
2y S�inq �1aar
C.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL' LOT - FILING �1 U 1 St-
ADDRESS
BUILDING NAME: y e y k1A', C"
D-
ZONING: C C-
E.
NAME OF 0NER(5): v� �+�� , r Cw- .►.�i
VJ
MAILING ADDRESS Q o \�Z i&
S
A , - J N 5 C O P14(WF; 92Co (9 2 1 l.v
i t F.
O WNE
G. NAME OF REPRBSENTATIYE. '\ — ' + J
MAIL INO ADDRESS: \ - n u - — -
�, c -&1 �o K S PHONE: i� - 5 '1 °C�
H- FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE,
SUIRMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIRItiMM AND THE FEE TO TAB
DEPARTMEM' OF CONDK MTY DEVELOPMErr1r, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAIL, COLORADO $1657.
Fm Paid. D . 6 D Cid> , (o� g ,e,al�J Lam..
Application Dace f 2 � I PEC Mee ft Dat a n r� l 77 g
trviwds6
VISTA BAHN BUILDING
VARIANCE REQUEST
December 14, 1998 (revised 12/21/98)
A. Summary of Variance Request
The purpose of the requested variance is for the Vista Bahn Building (formerly known as the
Vail Village Club Building) located on Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing, to obtain relief
from Section 12- 713-13, Density Control, of the Vail Municipal Code. The applicant is the
Remonov Company.
This variance request will allow the Vista Bahn Building to exceed the allowable Gross
Residential Floor Area (GRFA) permitted by the density control section of the Commercial Core
I Zone District. As proposed, the excess GRFA will be established by converting existing "non-
residential" square footage on the third and fourth floor of the building to GRFA. The proposed
variance does not involve any exterior modifications that will increase the height, size or bulk
and mass of the existing building. If approved, this variance request would nullify the existing
conditional use permit for a "quasi- public club" on the third and fourth floors of the building.
B. History of the Building /Existing Zoning
The following summarizes the recent history of the Vista Bahn Building:
Spring 1995
Town Planning and Environmental Commission approves a number of applications that facilitate
the re- development of the building. The "building program" approved by the Town included:
• Commercial uses in basement level
• Retail on first floor
• Restaurant on second floor
• Office space and residential condominium on third floor
• Residential condominium on fourth floor
Approvals for this building included a conditional use permit for approximately 695 square feet
of office space on the third floor of the building. The residential condominium was within the
allowable GRFA for the property.
Fall, 1995
Prior to construction of the building, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use
permit for a "quasi- public club" to be located on the third and fourth floors of the building. This
approval essentially "voided" the previously approved conditional use permit for the third floor
office space. With this change in use, the design of the building became a "single -use design ".
The implications of this change are discussed in greater detail below.
1996 -1997
Building construction occurs.
1998
The Vail Village Club fails and with it the developers of the project lose ownership of the
property. Bob Hernreich and Rick Mueller of the Remonov Company obtain ownership of the
property.
C. Variance Proposal
The Remonov's immediate goal for the property is to establish viable uses for the building that
are consistent with the permitted uses in the Commercial Core I zone district (CCI) and the
mixed -use character of Vail Village. Remonov intends to maintain commercial uses on the first
and second floors of the building and proposes to utilize the third and fourth floors for a
residential condominium. Contrary to the objectives of the original developer, Remonov does
not believe office space on the third floor is a viable use for the property. The recent failure of
the Vail Village Club would indicate that a club -type use is not a viable use for the third and
fourth floors. Residential use on the third and fourth floors is also consistent with existing
zoning for the property. In fact, the only permitted uses for levels above the second floor of a
buildine in CCI are lods4es and residential dwelliw4 units
Alternative uses for the third and fourth floor are fairly limited by CCI zoning and by the design
of the building. Designed as a single -use building, emergency egress to the fourth floor is
dependent upon internal access through the third floor. As such, unless a new egress point to and
from the fourth floor can be added to the building (a difficult, if not impossible proposition), the
internal circulation between the third and fourth floor must be maintained. This egress situation
has in large part dictated the applicant's proposal to establish one condominium unit within these
two floors of the building.
The GRFA variance is necessary because the existing square footage of the third and fourth
floors exceeds the GRFA permitted on the property. The following summarizes the allowable
and proposed GRFA for the building:
Site Area - 4,646 square feet
Allowable GRFA (80 %) - 3,716 square feet
Existing square footage of 3 rd and 4 th floors - 4,118 square feet
Proposed GRFA Excess - 402 square feet
While the existing building was constructed as approved by the Town, previously proposed uses
for the building and the uses permitted by the CCI zone district have created a dilemma for how
the third and fourth floors can be used. By zoning, the only permitted uses for the third and
fourth floor are lodges and residential dwelling units. However, converting the third and fourth
floors to residential in presently not possible because the existing square footage of these two
floors exceeds the allowable GRFA by 529 square feet. Regardless of the fact that the
conversion of this existing space will be accomplished with no exterior changes to the building
that would increase the height, size or bulk and mass of the existing building, a GRFA variance
is technically necessary in order to facilitate this conversion.
Prior to submitting this variance request, a variety of other alternatives for resolving this
situation were first considered:
Reduce GRFA by removing floor area
GRFA could be removed by physically removing a portion of the existing building.
Given that the bulk and mass of the building has been approved by the Town, this
alternative is far too extreme to be considered viable.
2. Propose an SDD
The entire building was developed without the need for an SDD. To propose an SDD
for a project that will not even involve physical expansion of the existing building
does not seem to the be most expeditious alternative.
3. Increase Parcel Size
Increasing the parcel size will increase the allowable GRFA. While technically
possible, this alternative was eliminated due to potential issues and complications
with the obtaining additional property and subdividing and re- zoning the parcels.
4. Reduce the GRFA on the 3 `' /4 Floors by changing uses
GRFA could be eliminated by introducing some other use to the third or fourth floors
in a manner similar to the third floor office space proposed by the original developer.
However, this would require approval of a conditional use permit and Remonov
believes third floor office space is not a viable use for the building. Concern over the
viability of third floor office space was also raised by the Planning Commission
during the 1995 review of the original development proposal.
After careful consideration of the alternatives outlined above, the variance process was selected
as the most appropriate mechanism for resolving this situation. As outlined in the following
section, a variance is an appropriate process given the very unique situation with this property
and the extreme hardship and practical difficulty that would result from strict and literal
compliance with the zoning regulations.
D. Variance Criteria /PEC Findings
The following summarizes compliance of the proposal with applicable review criteria and PEC
Findings necessary to approve a variance.
Consideration of Factors
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinity.
The proposed variance will not increase the height, size or bulk and mass of the existing
building and as such, will have no affect on existing or potential structures. The proposed
use is consistent with permitted uses for the CCI district and is consistent with uses on
surrounding properties.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of
a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment
among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special
privilege.
The "degree of relief' from the GRFA regulations is limited to only the existing square
footage in the building — no additional square footage is proposed for the building. Approval
of this variance request will allow for resolution of a very unique situation and in doing so
further the objectives of the zoning title by establishing a use on the third and fourth floors
that is consistent with the permitted uses in the CCI zone district.
The existing building in itself presents a significant physical hardship for the applicants. The
design of the building which contemplated a single -use further complicates the conversion of
this space. Due to other variances that have been approved in and around the Village Core
over the years, approval of this variance would not be a grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
The proposal will not increase the existing height, size and bulk and mass of the building. As
such, the variance request will have no adverse affect on the above considerations. Approval
of the variance will facilitate the conversion of this space from a quasi - public club to
residential. This change in use will dramatically reduce the parking demand on the Vail
Village Parking Structure.
PEC Findings
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
The variance request complies with Finding 1. Previously approved variances in and around
the vicinity of the subject property is typically considered the "test" for whether approval of a
variance would constitute a grant of special privilege. In this case, a site coverage variance
approved during the re- development of the adjacent Red Lion Building presents a good
example of why this proposal would not be a grant of special privilege. As indicated in the
March 13, 1995 staff memo regarding the original review of the Vail Village Club, the Red
Lion site coverage variance was "warranted" in part because it was related to conditions
associated with an existing building and not new construction — the inference being that
conformance with all applicable development standards can be more difficult when dealing
with an existing building than it is in dealing with new construction on a vacant site.
In the case of this application, the existing Vista Bahn Building constitutes a physical
hardship. Because existing floor area on the third and fourth floors exceeds allowable
GRFA, this space cannot be used in accordance the permitted uses of the CCI zone district
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
The variance request complies with Finding 2. The proposal involves no changes to the
existing height, size and bulk and mass of the building and as such will not be detrimental or
injurious to properties in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the
same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
The requested variance complies with Findings 3. A. As outlined above, the GRFA
regulation could be complied with by physically removing a portion of the third or fourth
floors — an alternative that would present an extreme practical difficulty and an unnecessary
physical hardship on the land owner. Another alternative for conforming with the GRFA
regulation would be to introduce a different use, such as the previously proposed office use,
on a portion of the third or fourth floors. While office use was approved for the third floor by
the PEC in 1995, a number of PEC members expressed significant reservations about the
viability of third floor office space and the applicant shares these concerns. This concern is
further supported by the lack of precedent for third floor office or commercial space within
the Village area. To pursue office use or some other conditional use for the third or fourth
floors could in theory remedy the GRFA situation. However, this alternative would create a
hardship for the applicant by "condemning" the building to a use that is not viable and
destine to fail.
The requested variance complies with Finding 3. B. The presence of the existing building
and the "ill- fated" saga of previously proposed and ultimately failed uses for the property
represent a set of extraordinary circumstances or conditions that would not apply generally to
other properties in the district.
E. Summary
The goal of the Remonov Company is to "pick up the pieces" of this project by establishing uses
that are both viable and consistent with the development objectives of the CCI zone district. The
introduction of residential use on the third and fourth floors is a big step in this effort. The
viability of residential uses in the core area is well - established and such a use is also consistent
with the "horizontal zoning" and mixed use character desired for the core area.
The propose variance will not change the exterior appearance of the building in any material
way. It will, however, allow the new owners of the property to move beyond the building's
troubled past and establish uses that will work for the building and work for the Town by
establishing a mixed use building in the Village Core.
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB BUILDING
VARIANCE REQUEST
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
December 14, 1998
Bridge Street Lodge Condo Association
281 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Linda Malaby
610 West Lionshead Circle
Suite 100
Vail, CO 81657
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Corporation
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
DEC -10 -98 15 =06 FROM -LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID= 19704764534 PAGE 2/15
s ,
Cjj- „ �AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANI
A L T A C 0 M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE A
Our Order # V262883 -8
For Information Only
LOT C, BLOCK 2 VAIL VILLAGE 1ST
- Charges -
Alta Owner Policy $6,793.00
Alta Lender Policy $120.00
Tax Report $20.00
- - TOTAL - - $6,933.00
* ** THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE, BUT AN ESTIMATE OF FEES. WHEN REFERRING
TO THIS ORDER, PLEASE REFERENCE OUR ORDER NO. V262883 -8
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY * **
1. Effective Date: November 06, 1998 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policies to be issued, and proposed Insured:
"ALTA” Owner's Policy 10 -17 -92 $8,900,000.00
Proposed Insured:
REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
"ALTA" Loan Policy 10 -17 -92 $6,900,000.00
Proposed Insured:
ROBIN E_ HERNREICH
3_ The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
PAGE 1
DEC -10 -98 15 :06 FROM :LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID =19704764534 PACE 3/15
Ch -,:AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE A
Our Order # V262883 -8
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as
follows:
LOT C, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDING TO THE
RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO_
PAGE 2
DEC -10 -96 15:06 FROM =LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID:19704764534 PAGE 4/15
_AICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPI_
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1
(Requirements) Our order ## V262883 -8
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or
mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest
to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-
wit:
Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied
and assessed against the subject premises which are due and
payable.
Item (d) Additional requirements, if any disclosed below:
1. CERTIFICATE OF DISMISSAL ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
FOR THE COUNTY OF EAGLE OF CIVIL ACTION NO. 98CV282 ENTITLED J.L_ VIELE
CONSTRUCTION, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF (S), VS_ REMONOV &
COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, ET AL, DEFENDANT (S). NOTICE OF LIS
PENDENS RECORDED June 05, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION N0. 658836.
2. CERTIFICATE OF DISMISSAL ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
FOR THE COUNTY OF EAGLE OF CIVIL ACTION NO. n/a ENTITLED SEMPLE BROWN
ROBERTS, P.C., PLAINTIFF (S), VS. MARGRETTA B. PARKS, RIVA RIDGE PARTNERS,
LLC, REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., J L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION KAREN SHEAFFER PUBLIC
TRUSTEE, DEFENDANT (S). NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS RECORDED September 21, 1998,
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 669906.
IF 'THERE IS A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY TO BE INSURED HEREIN FROM
THE VESTED OWNER SET FORTH IN ITEM 4 OF SCHEDULE A HEREIN, THE TERMS,
PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX MAY BE
APPLICABLE.
SENATE BILL 98 -045 STATES THAT EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 1998 THE
FEE FOR REQUESTS FOR RELEASES OF DEEDS OF TRUST WILL BE
$16.00.
NOTE: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1993, CORPORATIONS THAT DO NOT
MAINTAIN A PERMANENT PLACE OF BUSINESS IN COLORADO, AND
NONRESIDENT INDIVIDUALS, ESTATES AND TRUSTS WILL BE SUBJECT
TO A COLORADO WITHHOLDING TAX FROM THE SALES OF COLORADO
REAL ESTATE IN EXCESS OF $100,000.00. THE WITHHOLDING TAX
PAGE 3
DEC -10 -98 15 =07 FROM =LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID =19704764534 PAGE 5 /15
,dICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPi-
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1
(Requirements) Our Order # V262883 -8
WILL BE THE SMALLER OF TWO PERCENT OF THE SALES PRICE OR THE
NET PROCEEDS FROM THE SALES OF THE REAL ESTATE.
THE TAX WILL BE WITHHELD BY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OR
ITS AGENT AND SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, WHERE
IT WILL BE CREDITED TO THE SELLER'S INCOME TAX ACCOUNT AS AN
ESTIMATED TAX PAYMENT, THE SELLER CAN CLAIM CREDIT FOR THE
ESTIMATED PAYMENT AGAINST THE INCOME TAX LIABILITY WHEN HE
OR SHE FILES A COLORADO RETURN FOR THE YEAR OF THE SALE.
PAGE 4
DEC -10 -98 15 =07 FROM =LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID- 19704764534 PAGE 6/15
sCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAP,
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2
(Exceptions) Our Order # V262983 -8
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the
following matters unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
I. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the
public records.
2_ Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public
records.
3_ Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey inspection
of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the
public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material
heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown
by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters,
if any, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to
the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the
estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.
6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing
liens by the public records_
7_ Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the lien of
the new mortgage, if any, noted under Section 1 of Schedule B
hereof.
9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899,
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
PAGE 5
DEC -10 -98 15 =08 FROM =LAND TITLE GUARANTEE I13=19704764534 PAGE 7/15
L.._.ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAI._.
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2
(Exceptions) Our Order # V262883 -8
11, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR
NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 10, 1962, IN
BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179_
12. EXISTING UNRECORDED LEASES AND TENANCIES
13_ EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING.
14_ TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED July 09,
1996 IN BOOR 699 AT PAGE 454_
15_ ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE THE INSURED SHALL SUSTAIN DUE TO ORDER RE: MOTION TO
STAY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL AND FOR APPROVAL OF THE SUPERSEDEAS BOND,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 96 CV 120, DIVISION J, DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE,
STATE OF COLORADO, RECORDED JUNE 30, 1997 IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 807.
16. A DEED OF TRUST DATED August 05, 1998 FROM REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A
COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
ROBIN E. HERNREICH TO SECURE THE SUM OF $6,900,000.00, AND ANY OTHER.
AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED August 12, 1998, UNDER
RECEPTION NO. 665668.
17, LIEN EVIDENCED BY STATEMENT OF SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS, P-C. IN THE AMOUNT OF
$101,575.74 RECORDED January 16, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 644857.
18_ LIEN EVIDENCED BY STATEMENT OF J.L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION, INC., A COLORADO
CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,932.97 RECORDED February 25, 1998, UNDER
RECEPTION NO. 648107.
NOTE: AMENDED STATEMENT OF LIEN RECORDED MARCH 26, 1998 RECEPTION
NO. 650689 AND RERECORDED JUNE 5, 1998 RECEPTION NO. 658835.
19. LIEN EVIDENCED BY STATEMENT OF VAIL ELECTRONICS LTD. IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10,083.15 RECORDED July 23, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 663623.
20. LIEN EVIDENCED BY STATEMENT OF VAIL ELECTRONICS LTD., A COLORADO
CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,083.15 RECORDED August 27, 1998, 'UNDER
RECEPTION NO. 667554.
21. LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF DIETER MENZEL D /B /A MENZEL FURNITURE
IN THE AMOUNT OF $78,Q00-00 RECORDED NOVEMBER 6 1998 UNDER RECEPTION
NO. 675368.
PAGE 6
DEC -10 -96 15 06
FROM =LAND
TITLE
GUARANTEE
I13- 19704764534
PAGE 8/15
L A
N D T_
r L
E G U
A R
A
N T E E C
0
M
P A
N
Y
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Required by Senate Bill 91 -14
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing
district.
B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction
may be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries
of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County
Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County
Assessor_
Required by Senate Bill 92 -143
A> A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction
shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
DEC -10-96 15:08 FROM:LAND TJ GUARANTEE ID= 19704764V34 PAGE 9/15
c , �
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE A
Our Order # VTF263841-2
For Information Only
LOT C, BLK 2, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FL
- Charges -
Alta Lender Policy $5,113.00 (REISSUE RATE)
Tax Report $ 20.00
- - TOTAL - - $5,133.00
* ** THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE, BUT AN ESTIMATE OF FEES_ WHEN REFERRING
TO THIS ORDER, PLEASE REFERENCE OUR ORDER NO. VTF263841 -2
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY * **
1.
Effective
Date:
November 0�
1998 at 5:00 P.M.
2.
Policy to
be issued,
and proposed
Insured:
"ALTA" Loan Policy 10 - 17 - 92
$6,500,000.00
Proposed Insured:
FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OPERATING AS DEPOSIT GUARANTY
NATIONAL BANK
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as
follows:
LOT C, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDING TO THE
RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
PAGE 1
DEC -10 -90 1509 FROM =LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID-19704764534
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1
PAGE 10/15
(Requirements) Our Order # VTF263841 -2
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or
mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest
to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-
wit:
Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied
and assessed against the subject premises which are due and
payable.
Item (d) Additional requirements, if any disclosed below:
1. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TO BE GIVEN TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY.
2. INDEMNITY AGREEMENT FROM BORROWER /DEVELOPER, ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY,
REGARDING THE DELETION OF ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS.
3. THE EXAMINATION BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF CIVIL CASE FILE 96 CV
120 REFERENCED IN ITEM NO. 15 OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 TO ASCERTAIN STATUS
OF APPEAL. -
NOTE: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE FURTHER
REQUIREMENTS AND EXCEPTIONS UPON COMPLETION OF SAID EXAMINATION.
4. CERTIFICATE OF DISMISSAL ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
FOR THE COUNTY OF EAGLE OF CIVIL ACTION NO. 98CV282 ENTITLED J.L. VIELE
CONSTRUCTION, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF (S), VS. REMONOV &
COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION, ET AL, DEFENDANT (S). NOTICE OF LIS
PENDENS RECORDED June 05, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 658836.
5. CERTIFICATE OF DISMISSAL ISSUED BY THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND
FOR THE COUNTY OF EAGLE OF CIVIL ACTION NO. n/a ENTITLED SEMPLE BROWN
ROBERTS, p_C_, PLAINTIFF (S), VS. MARGRETTA B. PARKS, RIVA RIDGE PARTNERS,
LLC, REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., J L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION KAREN SHEAFFER PUBLIC
TRUSTEE, DEFENDANT (S). NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS RECORDED September 21, 1998,
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 669906.
6. RELEASE OF LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS,
F.C. IN THE AMOUNT OF $101,575.74 RECORDED January 16, 1998, UNDER
RECEPTION NO. 644857.
PAGE 2
DEC -10 -96 15 =09 FROM =LAND TITLE GUARANTEE ID:19704764534 PAGE 11/15
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1
(Requirements) Our Order # VTF263841 -2
7. RELEASE.; OF LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF J_L_ VIELE CONSTRUCTION,
INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,932.97 RECORDED February
25, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 648107_
NOTE: AMENDED STATEMENT OF LIEN RECORDED MARCH 26, 1998 RECEPTION
NO. 650689 AND RERECORDED JUNE 5, 1998 RECEPTION NO. 658835.
8. RELEASE OF LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF VAIL ELECTRONICS LTD. IN
THE AMOUNT OF $10,083.15 RECORDED July 23, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION
NO. 663623.
9. RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED August 05, 1998 FROM REMONOV & COMPANY,
INC_, A COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE
USE OF ROBIN E. HERNREICH TO SECURE THE SUM OF $6,900,000.00 RECORDED
August 12, 1998, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 665668.
10. RELEASE OF LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF VAIL ELECTRONICS LTD., A
COLORADO CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,083.15 RECORDED August 27, 1998,
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 667554.
11. RELEASE OF LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF DIETER MENZEL D /B /A MENZEL
FURNITURE IN THE AMOUNT OF $338,000.00 RECORDED November 06, 1998, UNDER
RECEPTION NO. 675368.
12. DEED OF TRUST FROM REMONOV k COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION TO THE
PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
OPERATING AS DEPOSIT GUARANTY NATIONAL BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF
$6,500,000.00_
NOTE: SAID DOCUMENT MUST BE EXECUTED BY THE PRESIDENT, VICE - PRESIDENT OR
SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION. IF AN ASSISTANT VICE - PRESIDENT OR ASSISTANT
SECRETARY EXECUTES SAID DOCUMENT, A CORPORATE RESOLUTION MUST BE PROVIDED
TO LAND TITLE GIVING SAID ASSISTANT AUTHORIZATION.
IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY TO BE INSURED HEREIN FROM
THE VESTED OWNER SET FORTH IN ITEM 4 OF SCHEDULE A HEREIN, THE TERMS,
PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TRANSFER TAX MAY BE
APPLICABLE.
NOTE: UPON RECEIPT OF A SATISFACTORY IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE,
ITEM NOS. 1 -3 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED FROM THE
MORTGAGEES POLICY WHEN ISSUED_
NOTE: ITEM NO. 4 WILL BE DELETED FROM THE MORTGAGEES POLICY UPON RECEIPT
OF A SATISFACTORY INDEMNITY AGREEMENT.
PAGE 3
DEC -10 -90 I5 =10 FROM -LAND TITLE GUARANTEE I13= 19704764534 PACE 12/15
` CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A L T A C O M M I T M E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1
(Requirements) Our Order # VTF263841 -2
NOTE: I'T'EM 5 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE
RECORDS THE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED UNDER SCHEDULE B -1_
NOTE: UPON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, ITEM 6 WILL BE AMENDED TO READ:
TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1998, AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, NOT YET DUE
OR PAYABLE.
ITEM 7 UNDER SCHEDULE B -2 WILL BE DELETED UPON PROOF THAT THE WATER AND
SEWER CHARGES ARE PAID UP TO DATE.
SENATE BILL 98 -045 STATES THAT EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 1998 THE
FEE FOR REQUESTS FOR RELEASES OF DEEDS OF TRUST WILL BE
$16.00_
NOTE: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1993, CORPORATIONS THAT DO NOT
MAINTAIN A PERMANENT PLACE OF BUSINESS IN COLORADO, AND
NONRESIDENT INDIVIDUALS, ESTATES AND TRUSTS WILL BE SUBJECT
TO A COLORADO WITHHOLDING TAX FROM THE,SALES OF COLORADO
REAL ESTATE IN EXCESS OF $100,000.00. THE WITHHOLDING TAX
WILL BE THE SMALLER OF TWO PERCENT OF THE SALES PRICE OR THE
NET PROCEEDS FROM THE SALES OF THE REAL ESTATE.
THE TAX WILL BE WITHHELD BY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OR
ITS AGENT AND SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, WHERE
IT WILL BE CREDITED TO THE SELLER'S INCOME TAX ACCOUNT AS AN
ESTIMATED TAX PAYMENT - THE SELLER CAN CLAIM CREDIT FOR THE
ESTIMATED PAYMENT AGAINST THE INCOME TAX LIABILITY WHEN HE
OR SHE FILES A COLORADO RETURN FOR THE YEAR OF THE SALE.
PAGE 4
DEC -10 -9 e 15:10 FROM: LAND T1' ".E GUARANTEE ID:19704764F34
CHICAGO
TITLE
INSURANCE
COMPANY
A L T A
C O
M M I T M
E N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2
(E
PAGE 13/15
Our Order # VTF263841 -2
The policy or policies to be issue will contain exceptions to the to
following matters unless e
satisfaction of the Company-
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the
public records.
of easements, not shown by the public
2. Easements, or Claims
records -
3. Discrepancies, and any a correct s survey e inspection
encroachments
of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by t e
public records -
4_ Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material
imposed by Yaw and not shown
heretofore or hereafter furnished,
by the public records -
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claimlicrrecords matters,
if any, created, first appearing in the pub
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to
the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the
estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.
6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing
liens by the public records.
7. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, it any.
8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the lien of
the new mortgage, if any, noted under Section 1 Of Schedule B
hereof.
g. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A V EIN
BE FOUND LO
O PENETRATETOR DINT REMOVE RS CT THE PREMISES
THEREFROM. SHOULD THE SAME 48 AT
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899. IN BOOK
PAGE 475-
10.. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OC STATES PATE _ NT RECORDED Y 0 13, T 1899, CANALS
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UN
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475,
PAGE 5
DEC -10 -98 15 711 FROM =LAND T -LE GUARANTEE ID7197047GO-34
PAGE 14/15
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
A L T A C 0 M M I T M B N T
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2
(Exceptions) Our Order ## VTF263841 -2
COVENANTS 11_ RESTRICTIVE WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,
NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 10, 1962, IN
BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179_
12. EXISTING UNRECORDED LEASES AND TENANCIES
13. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING_
14. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED July 09,
1996 IN BOOK 699 AT PAGE 454.
15. ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE THE INSURED SHALL SUSTAIN DUE TO ORDER RE: MOTION TO
STAY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL AND FOR APPROVAL OF THE SUPERSEDERS BOND,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 96 CV 120, DIVISION J, DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE,
STATE OF COLORADO, RECORDED JUNE 30, 1997 IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 807.
16.
PAGE 6
DEC -10 -98 15-11
FROM -LAND
TITLE
GUARANTEE
ID =19704754534
PACE 15/15
. L A
N D T
I T L
E G U A
R A
N T E E C
O
M
P
A N Y
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Required by Senate Bill 91 -14
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing
district.
B) A Certificate
listing each
or
may
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries
of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County
Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County
Assessor.
Required by Senate Bill 92 -143
A) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction
shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 01
LUNSFORD.R...
MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED
Plumbing " Heating' Air Conditioning' Refrigeration
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: 11/24/98
TRANSMISSION TO:
ATTN: CHARLIE
T.O.V. INSPECTIONS
PAGES TRANSMITTED (including Cover Sheet) 30
SUBJECT: TEST & BAL ANCE REPORT VAIL VILLAGE C LUB
FAX # : 970 -479 -2452
COMMENTS:
FOR YOUR USE AND REVIEW.
FROM:
FAX: (970) 242 -7634
2481 COMMERCE BLVD. - GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 (970) 242 -5790 FAX (970) 242 -7634
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 06
NE. BB
PROJECT
SYSTEM
AIR OUTLET TEST REPORT
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
RTU -1
Area ut et Design Prel. Final
Serve it TvnR Ai7w ( 1 *rm r _;:KA C'FIU of
4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGEI 1
P9-1
1 2'
X
1SLOT
180
236
219 122%
4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE
21
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
180
2231
189i 105%
4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE; 3
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
180
1681
184 102%
4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE
4
PS -1
2'
X
ISLOT
180
1821
181i 101%
! 4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE;
5
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
3.80
2211
202
112%
i 4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE
a
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
1801
247
129
1 4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE
7
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
1801
243`
225; 125%
1 4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE
81
PS -1
2'
X
ISLOTI
1801
221.
220; 122%
4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE!
9
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
180
2041
212
118%
! 4TH
FLOOR
LOUNGE,
10.
PS -1
2'
X
1SLOT
1$0
1881
204.
113%
I BAR
11
L -$
12X12
1501
585
149!
9 9%
i
I
i
1
1
I
i
'
I
TOTAL
1950
271$
2217
114%
READINGS
WITH LOW
MOOD AND
ARt
CORRECTED
TO ALTITUDE_
REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab hoodl
DIRECT DRIVE MOTOR ON LOWEST SPEEp.
NO DAMPERS ON SLOT DIFFUSERS TO REDUCE AIR FLOW.
8/12/97 READINGS BY:G. GORMAN
97VVCH1
r
NE. BB
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM /UNIT:
BASEMENT
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT"
MUA -1
I UNIT DATA MOTOR DATA
MakeNOW No_ M
MAGIC AIRE MakwFrame L
LEESON
TypdStze 9
90 BHW -4 H.P. 1
1.5
f TEST DATA DESIGN I ACTUAL TEST DATA DESIGN ACT_UA_L_
! Total CFM 2900 F.xt Discharge S.P. -22
Register Total 2900 2 7 3 7 Ext Suctlon S.P. 5 0
Fen RPM 850 : Extemat S. P. 1.25 7 7
Motor RPM 1751 1 FAN SUCTION S.P. . 8 8 _ - --
Heating i _....... __.
Motor Volta 208 210 ! LAT 90 142
Motor volts 208 2 0 7 EAT -15 58
Motor Volts 208 210 i Temp. ddf. 105 84
Motor Amps 5.6 3 . 1 'GPM 14 _
Motor Amps 5.6 3.6 EWT 190 167
Motor Amps 5.6 3.9 i LWT 150 141
Temp. OR. 40 1 26 _
CFIA f
BHP
1
Oubgde Air CFM 100% OSA Damper Poe. _
Retum Air CFM RA Damper Poa_ ;
REMARKS:
TEST DATE: 9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97VVCA
tab 438
REMARKS:
TEST DATE: 9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97VVCA
tab 438
THOML6
XVMOO 'O:JlBS`JNIW3N L 6 /OT /6
0004 qet -
:3WVN 3113
:31VO 1531
S)WVW3M
hlil
UOO �► ONV OOOH
MOIJ HUM 2fd SJNlQ4f3a
%96
L£ LZ
L6U
006Z
Tdl
I
I
I
i
I
I
%Z6 i STT
i T81
SZT
90ZT
sovs9vw
WPM , 8L
1013
SL
9OZT
b -Z
OL ! SO
6 %56 : EVT
I tLt
OST
90ZT
U -
6
i $NaWOMI
%SOL i8ST
IM 109T
90ZT
S
%LLL :0
16TTr
00
ZTbZ
S -rI
1
SHRXDo'I
%OLL , 0vti 1999
00v
ZTbZ
S - 'I
9
Sx3x�0'I'
r %OLL TSTi I VL9
loov
zTVZ I
5 -'i
%LLL Z6 IgEs
00TF
ZT j
S -'I
ti
S2I3?i
%96 i LEZ i TQZ
05Z
8ovz
OT - Z
£
EWUOIS .LOOS i
%b6 !9U jTTZ
OSZ
80bZ
OT l
i
SJYHO,I.S ,LOOS
9/aD 0 10
00£
QS'17YI.SNI ION
L I
`JNIIIZNI].L
W30 W30 W30 aZ!S sal # paivas
Isu!=l qa }d U6!s2q 3a13no eaif
T -VrIW W31SAS —
SMD 2OV7 CIA 'I IVA 103r08d
88 3N
laod3H lssi aiv _
J
AIR APPARATUS
NE: TEST REPORT
PROJECT VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM /UNIT: MUA -2
OCATION: 2ND FLOOR / KITCHEN - -_...
UNIT DATA I MO' DATA
rFrame BALDOR
ulakdMOdelNo. !. DLJNHAI"i'BUSH Make 2
I 02LF890401 K.P.
rypelSi�e HD i RPM 1725 ^_.... _.. _
�SerialNumbar 88088401A 200
HW /MUA !Volts 3/60
Arr./Ctass I PhoseHertZ -- - --
Discharge I UP FLOW 7.1 _.._ .._ .
i BROWNING F t
Make Sheave 5 �� 1.2
- - --
Sheave DWmISOre 7" X i 3.75
" X 7/8
- -- _ -.
1 -A47 i Sheave piprNBare
NO. 8elmlmskefs¢e 3 .7 - --
2 - 16X2 0X2 ( Shaave °per• Diam
-1 Na. F'�tae , 2 _ 16X2 5X2 I Sheave C!L p�tanca - --
TEST DATV:
FILE NAME:
tab 438
9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C . G ORMAN
97VVCA
16
44
60
.73
142
69
73
17
166
144
22
REMARKS AIR FLOW, SLIGHTLY NEGITXVE IN TO K
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 10
NL. r�
PROJECT
SYSTEM
AIR OUTLET TEST REPORT
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
MUA -2
ea 3 ut et ign Prel. Final
c mA 4 Tar%m Sao C FM CF CFM %
CORRIDOR
1
L -3
1208
350
1 350
1 348: 99%
KITCHEN 1
21
DO -2
36X12
1325
14231
1405: 106%
KITCHEN
31
DO -2
36X12
1325
1563 1 1435 108%
! KITCHEN
1 41
CHANGED L -3
1812
600
4721 559' 93%
SEVICE
5
L-2
1208
250
230! 237: 95%
;CE ILING SPACE
6
SEE NOTE
8 RD.
1501
1501 150; 1000,
i
{
I
I
I
f
I
i
i
I '
TO TAL.
4000
4188
4134
103%
RFAIIINAR ARE WITH FLOW
HOOD AND ARE CO RRECIVO
TO ALTITUDE.
REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab hoods
NO ACCESS TO 8" ROUND DAMPER 150 CFM + -.
9/10/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
97VVCH1
NE. BB
PROJECT: VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM/UNIT:
LOCATION: BASEMENT
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT
FC -1
UNIT DATA MOTOR DATA
MakelMCKW No. MAGIC AIFtE Make/Frame GE ' --
TEST DATA
DES IGN
I ACTUAL TEST DATA
TypalS4v
DHW - 4 0 0 i H. P.
1/10
Serial Num
970189799 : RPM
955
Arr. /Clam
HW FA COIL ' Vofts
115
Discharge
HORIZONTAL : PheaelHerft
_
1/60
Make Sheave
DIRECT DRIVE F.I..Amps
_
2.1
Sheave DianUBore
J S.l.Amps
_._.. .
1 NO. Bette/makoA&o
I Sheave DlamlBore
DIRECT DRIVE
1 No. FimrR_ypelsim 1 1-
2 4 X 12 X 1 ? Sheave o pen. Diam
3 SPD
Sheave C!L morAALr
115
TEST DATA
DES IGN
I ACTUAL TEST DATA
I DESIGN 1 ACTUAL
Total CFM
4
fwd Discharge S.P.
.1
Register Total
4 00
4 61 : 6d Suction S.P.
.
Fan RPM
726 i Extemal S.P.
. 5 0 "
i .16
Motor RPM
LOW SPD I FAN SUCTION S.P.
_
.20
603 ON HIGH
SPD I Heating
Motor Volts
115
119 1 LAT
90
15 4
Motor Voft
' EAT
-15
71
Motor Volta
I Temp. di f.
105
8 3
Motor Amps
2.1
.9
Motor Ampe
GPM
2.5
2 . 7 --
Motor Amps
EWT
190
173
lwT
150
_
151
CFI.A
I Temp. dif1.
40
_
22
BHP
I
�—
__,
Outside Air CFM
100%
OSA Damper Pos.
Retum Air CFM
RA Dam Pos,
REMARKS ONE REGISTER IN ELEVATOR LOBBY, SMOKE DAMPER
MANUALLY OPENED FOR TESTING.
TEST DATE: 9/ 8 - 12 / 97 READINGS BY: C. GO RMAN
FILE NAME: 97VVCA
tab 438
TT ggVA 7ti0INVH03W CHOASNn VC9L- ZbZ -0L6 ZB :8Z 8662 /bZ /ZZ
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 12
_ r
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT
PROJECT: VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM /UNIT: FC -2
LOCATION: 1ST FLOOR RETAIL AREA #3
UNIT DATA I MOTOR DATA
Make/Model No.
MAGIC AIRE ' MakelFrame
GE
i Type/Site
DHW -4 0 0 H. P.
1/10 _
Serial Number
970189800
I RPM
955 _
i Arr.lClass
HW FAN COIL
lvoft
115
Discharge
HORIZONTAL
PhaaeMortx
1/60
Make Sheave
'; DIRECT DRIVE
F- L.Amps
2.1 w-
i Sheave DWPUBare
Motor RPM
S.L.Amps
LOW SPD
! NO. BeWmake/s¢e
Sheave Olammore
DIRECT DRIVE
No.FilterAype%ae
1- 24X12X1 i Shameoper- Diem
3 SPD
!
' Sheave C/L Dietance
Motor Voft
TEST DATA
DESIGN
ACTUAL
PEST DATA
DESIGN ACTUAL
Total CFM
400
Ext Discharge S.P.
1 -22
Register Total
400
4 3 7
Ext Suction S.P.
.07 _
Fen RPM
710
1 External S -P.
.50
.29
Motor RPM
LOW SPD
FAN SUCTION S.P.
.22
Heating
Motor Voft
115
119
tAT
90
14 5
Motor Vob
EAT
—15
71
Motor Volts
Temp. diR.
10 5
74
Motor Amps
2.1
.9
~
Motor Ampe
GPM
2.5
2 . 5
Motor Amps
EWT
190
164
t_wT
150
143
CF.A
Temp- ddT.
40
21
BHP
Outside Air CFM
100%
08A Damper Poe.
Return Air CFM
RA Damper Pos-
REMARKS: 2 REGISTERS
RETAIL #3 209 CFM
HALLWAY 228 CFM
TEST DATE: 9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97VVCA
- tab 438
NE. �B
PROJECT: VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM/UNIT:
LOCATION: 1ST FLOOR BAR
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT
F'C -3
UNIT r3ATA MOTOR DATA -
Make/Model No.
MAGIC AIRE MakelFrame
GE -
-
TyperS¢e
DHW - 4 0 0 H.P.
1110
Serial Number
970189808 RPM
955
Arr./Clan
RW FAN COIL Volt
115
Discharge
HORIZONTAL ' Phase/Heft
1/60
Make Sheave
DIRECT DRIVE F.LAmps
2.1 —
Sheave OWndSors
S.L.Ampa
_-
NO. Bdts/makelkize
Sheave DismMore
DIRECT DRIVE
No. FilteutypeAes
1- 2 4 X 12 X 1 Sheave oper. Diam
1 3 S PD
I FAN SUCTION S.P.
i She ave CAL Distance
_
.4
• TEST DATA
DESIGN
ACTUAL,
TEST DATA
DESIGN
ACT
Total GFM
400
5 21
F xt Discharge S.P.
.0 3
Register Told
' Ext SucWn S.P.
.12 ._
Fan RPM
967
; Extemd S.P.
.50"
. 15
i Motor RPM
LOW S PD
I FAN SUCTION S.P.
_
.4
Heating
_
Motor Volts
115
119
LAT
90
i 1 -- _.._
L Motor Vob
FAT
-15
i 80
i Motor Vohs
; Temp. diff.
10 5
7 5
Motor Amps
2.1
1.
Motor Amps
GPM
2.5
3 . 0 _
Motor Amps
EWT
190 1- 165
�Lwr
150
131 _
CFLA
1 Temp. dta.
40
34
BHP
{
i
Outside Air CFM
100%
OSA pamper Pos.
_
Retum Air CFM
FtA Damper Poe.
REMARKS: FLY SCREEN ON LOUVER WILL NEED TO BE KEEP CLEAN.
TEST DATE: 9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
F NAME: 9 7VVC A
tab 4-38
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 14
NE: BB
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
MakefMadel No.
Type/S¢e
Serial Number
Arr, /Chas
Docharge
Make Sheave
Sheave DiamfBore
NO. BeWmake►s¢e
-" i No.Filterrtype/s ¢ e
Total CFM
Register Total
Fan RPM
M otor RPM
Motor Volts
Motor Volts
rf-4:ol:0r:V:oj::::
Motor Amps
Motor Amps
Motor Amps
j C FLA
rBHP
P I
Outside Air CFM
Retum Air CFM
REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab 438
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
SYSTEM /UNIT:
1ST FLOOR BAR
DATA
Ml
MAGIC AIRE
MakelFnune
DHX -10 0 0
H.P.
970188695
'RPM
DX/ ELEC HEAT
Vob
HORIZONTAL
Phasemo"z
DIRECT DRIVE
F.LAmps
S.LAM
Sheave Di AMOre
1- 3 4 X 14 X 1
Sheave open. Diam
Shaava CA. DO
DESIGN
110 0
1050
ACTUAL
13 2 7
$13
TEST DATA
Ext Discharge S.P.
Ext Suction S P
External S. P.
LOW SPD
119
i FAN SUCTION S -P.
i Hem4ng
lAT
EAT
115
4.3
! Temn . cliff"
i Kw
(AMPS
Cooling
EAT
!LAT
Temp. d ff.
6,9
j OSA Damper Poa.
I RA Damper Pos. _
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT
FC -4
1/3
1000
115
1/60
6.9
DIRECT DRIVE
3 SPD
10
N
.12
.05
17
.42
133
69
64
15.1
70
53
17
ELECTRIC HEAT SET UP FOR ALL STAGES TO COME
ON AT SAME TIME.
DUCT HEATER INSTALLED BACKWARDS TO ARROWS, CONTROL
CONTRACTOR CHANGED AIR FLOW CONTROL SO HEATER
WILL WORK.
9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
97VVCA
N BB
.
AIR OUTLET TEST REPORT
PROJECT VAIL VILLAGE CLUB -
SYSTEM FC -4, 5, 6 AND 8
Outlet Design rel_ anal
Served # Type Size CFM CFM CFM %
REMARKS_
TEST DATE:
- FILE NAME:
tab hoodl
I r �P "A
9/9-10/97 READINGS BY : C . GORMAN
97WCH1
7hgTKMWngw amn -GNm vc9L- ZbZ - 0L6 Z0 :8Z 8661/bZ/11
FC -4
BAR
1 I
CB -1
18X6
150
278
187 125%
BAR
21
C9 -
18X6
150
232
197 i 131%
BAR
3
CB -1
18X6
150
1
180: 120°x°
BAR
4
CS -1
18X
150
221
18 7 ; : 125
BAR
F5
CB -1
18X6
150
255
165
BAR
6
CB - 1
18X6
150
209
194 1 29%
gpR
7
CS - 1
18X6
150
149
197 131%
TOTAL
1050
1523
1327 126%
FAN ON LOWEST
SPEED.
_ —.... ,
MBAR
1
L_11
400
629
436 109 °�°
BAR 1
21
L -11
150
269
178 119%
BAR
I 3
L -11
400
511
4411 110%
BAR
41
150
219
182 121%
TOTAL
1050
16281
1237 118
FAN ON LOWEST
SPEED.
FC -6
DINING
1
DO -5
12X6
200
254
-
292! 146
DIMING
2
DO -5
18X6
350
405
391 112%
DINING
31
DO -5
18X6
350
383
342 98 °i °'
TOTAL
900
1042
10251 1140/9.
FAN ON LOWEST
SPEED.
FC -8
CLOSING REGIS
ER OBD ONLY
INCREA
ED NOI
E LEVEL.
MENS
1
DO -8
12X6
150
283
164.
109°x
PLC
2
NO ACCESS
450
550
490
109%
DININ
3
DO -8
12X6
100
184
X11
111 %;
TOTAL
700
1017
765
10 9 °A 1
FAN ON LOWEST
PEED
w e g ARF I.
R D TO
ALTITUDE.
REMARKS_
TEST DATE:
- FILE NAME:
tab hoodl
I r �P "A
9/9-10/97 READINGS BY : C . GORMAN
97WCH1
7hgTKMWngw amn -GNm vc9L- ZbZ - 0L6 Z0 :8Z 8661/bZ/11
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 16
AIR APPARATUS
N E . BB TEST REPORT
PROJECT: VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM /UNIT: FC -5
LOCATION: 2ND FLOOR
UNIT DATA MOTOR DATA
Make/Model No_
I MAGIC AIRE ! MakalFrame
GE _
TypW$ize
DHX -100 0 N.P.
1/3
Sena/ Number
iRPM
1000 _
Ar r./Class
DX FAN COIL i Vohs
115 _
Discharge
HORIZONTAL PhaaeMaltz
10.0166667
Make Sheave
DIRECT DRIVE ; F.LAmps
6.9
Sheave D iam/Bore
(Heating
NO. SeWmake/nize
! SheavaDiam/Bore
DIRECT DRIVE
No. Fikernypeh¢e
1- 3 4 X 1Xl I Sheave oper_ Diam
I Sheave CA- Distance
3 S PD _
TEST DATA
Total CFM 1
DESIGN I ACTUAL TEST DATA
1100 i Ext Discharge S.P.
I DESIGN 1 ACTUA
I .2 2
Register Total
1050
1237 i Fxt Suction S_ P.
I -03
i Fan RPM
799 Extemal S.P.
.25 _
Motor RPM
LOW SPD i FAN SUCTION S.P.
1 -40 _
(Heating
_
Motor Voft
115
120 lAT
N/A
i Motor Volta
j EAT
Motor Volts
Temp. dilf.
MSH
I Motor Amps
6.9
4.7
'Motor Amps
Cog
Motor Amps
EAT
68
LAT
45
CFLA
Temp. diff.
23
BHP
_
Outside Air CFM
OSA Damper Poe.
Retum Alr CFM
RA Damper Poe_
REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab 438
9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
97VVCA
m
f- AIR APPARATUS
NE. BB TEST REPORT
PROJECT. VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEMIUNIT: FC-6
LOCATION: 2ND FLOOR
"NIT B ATA MOTOR DATA
i M**Mww No.
MAGIC AIRE Make/Frww
GE
Typerode
i
DKX-800 H.P.
1/4
Serial Number
97187454 iRPM
1070
Arr,/Clan
DX FAN COIL I voles
115
Discharge
HORIZONTAL i phnwHwtz
1/60
Make Sheave
DIRECT DRIVE
TF.
�p$
4-1
Sheave D*nffiwe
5.1-Amps
NO, BdWmaketsize
I Sheave DiarwBore
DIRECT DRIVE
No-Fifte►Mpalsks
1-27X14X1
shame oper. Diem
3 SPD
Motor Volts
1 Sheave CIL Distance
I TEST DATA
Total CFM
DESIGN ACTUAL I
goo - 7
TEST DATA DESIGN — 1 AL; I UAL
Ext Discharge S.P. .08
Register TOW
900
1025
Ext Suction S-P_
. 02
Fan RPM
830
E)demmd S.P.
.10
Motor RPM
LOW SPD
FAN SUCTION S.P.
.38
Heating
Motor Volts
115
119
LAT
Motor Volts
EAT
Motor Volts
Temp. cflff-
M13H
Motor Amps
4.1
2.7
Motor Amps
Cooling
Motor Amps
EAT
72
LAT
54
CFLA
Temp. diff.
18
BHP
Outride Air CFM
OSA Damper Pos.
Datum Air CFM
RA Damper Pas.
— REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab"
9/8-12/97
97VVCA
READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
) T - jn"-i - IW')TKMPnqW amnARNn VE9L-ZVZ-0L6 Z0 :8T 8662 /VZ/TT
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 18
r AIR APPARATUS
N E r� TE REPORT
— PROJECT:
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
SYSTEWUNIT: FC--7
LOCATION_
2ND FLOOR
I
HI SPD
UNIT
DATA
MOTOR
DATA
MakelModal No.
I MAGIC AIRE
MakelFrame
GE - - - -•
TyowSize :-7�—�
600
' H.P.
1/6
Sepal Number
1
'RPM
1005
Arr./Cless
I DX FAN COIL
Vohs
115
Di harye
I
PhawMeftx
1/60
3 • 7
Make Sheave DIRECT DIVE F.LAmps
Sheave Diarn/8ors
3.5
I S.L.Ampe
— - -"
NO. BaWmakehize
Motor Amps
: Sheave owwuore
DIRECT DRIVE
No, Filted yPW%ize
I- 2 4 X12 X 1
I Sheave oper. Diam
3 S PD
Sheave CA- Distance
_
- F-q7 DATA
I DESIGN ACTUAL
? TEST DATA
I DESIGN ' ACTUAL -
Total CFM
R eg �terTotal
i Fa n RPM
450
! Ext Discharge S.P.
513 F�ctSuction
1003 1 Extemal S.P.
_
0?
.57
Motor RPM
I
HI SPD
FAN SUCTION S.P.
( 22
i
Motor volts
115
119 1
Nesting
LAT
N/A M
Motor Volts
EAT
I Motor Vob
Temp• dAT.
MBH
Motor Amps
3.7
3.5
Motor Amps
i Cooling
Motor Amps
� FAT
tAT
6 7 i
48
I
Temp. drR.
1 9
CFLA
BHP
03A Dam
Outside Air CFM
RA Damp
Return Air CFM
REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
-' tab 438
CONTROL CONTRACTOR STATED THIS UNIT NEEDED TO BE
HIGH SPEED FOR CORRECT OPERATION OF CONDENSING UNIT.
WOOD REGISTER CAUSING STAIGHT DOWN DRAFT OF AIR:
9/8 READINGS BY: C • GORMAN
97VVCA
C AIR A PPARAT U S
NE BB TEST REPORT
PROJECT VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEMIUNIT: FC -8
LOCATION:
.....� rti eTA UnTnR DATA
MakelModel No.
MAGIC AIRE MakelFn ne
GE
TypWsae
030- DUX -A -2HW : H.P.
1/3 _� - - -•
Serial Number
970290761 -RPM
1000
1 Arr.lClaes
HW /DX FAN COIL ' Volts
115
I Discharge
UP FLOW 1 PhaaWHOU
1/60
Make Sheave
F.L Ampu
2.0
Sheave DiamlBore
DIRECT DRIVE S - LAmps
Motor v oRs
NO- Belm/mstalaize
SheareQiammom
DIRECT DRIVE
No.FilW ypals¢e
1- 24X18X1 i Shame oper. Diem
3 SPD
1 EAT
She*ft CA- DWAnce
74
TEST DATA I DESIGN I ACTUAL 1 TE ST DATA DESIGN ' ACTUAL_
Totes CFM A
700
Ext Discharge S -P-
24
Register Total
700
7 6 5 ! Ext -- -- S.P-
. 2 0 - --
Fen RPM
837 Exdemal S.P.
S " 44 _._ —..
Motor RPM
FAN SUCTION S.P.
.3
1 Heating
Motor v oRs
115
119
L AT
60 124 _
Motor Volt
1 EAT
-15 1
74
Motor Voft
Temp- dil[-
75
50
Motor Amps
6.9
4.5 !
^—
Motor Amps
GPM
3.5
Motor Amps
EAT
1 7 3
LAT
I 154
CFLA
Temp- cN.
! 19 -
BHP
Outside Air CFM
OSA Damper Pos.
Ratum Air CFM
RA Damper Poe.
REMARKS:
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab 438
9/8 -12/97
97VVCA
READINGS BY: C. GQRMAN
CT 3m"-j 1HITMk -)" qW eNnanNm VE9L- ZVZ -0L6 Z0 :81 8662 /VZ /Zt
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL
T B
PROJECT: VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM /UNIT:
LOCATION: 3RD FLOOR
_. UNIT DATA MOTC
Make/ No MAGIC AIRE Make/Frame
~ Typ"ze ' 024 -CCX -A H.P.
- Serial Nurnbw 970290762 ! RPM
Arr./Claea DX FAN COIL V oft
Discharge HORIZONTAL I Phase/Heft
Make Sheave DIRECT DRIVE i:.LAmpe
Sheave OMMMOre 6.1,-Amps
No. aelte/makGhQ@ Sheave pianflBore
No.FiRerAypahlze I 1- 38X9X1 sheaveoper. Diem
Sheonm C/L Ch t nce
_ TEST pATA DESIGN ACTUAL TEST DATA
i Total CFM
160
7 Ext Discharge S• P.
Register Total 600 5 31 Ext Suction S.P.
Fan RPM 1163 External S -P_
I Motor RPM I HIGH SPD I FAN SUCTION S.P.
I
1 Heating
! Motor Vans 115 119 ' LAT
Motor Vob EAT
Motor Volts 1 Temp. W.
MSH
Motor Amps 1.8 1 . 0
Motor Amps CoaBn
I Motor Amps EAT
LAT
CFtA Temp. dfff.
BHP
Outside Air CFM OSA Oemper Poe
Return Au CFM RA Damper POs-
REMARKS:
PAGE 20
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT
FC -9
)ATA
GE
1/8
1120
115
1/60 _...
1.8 _.....
DIRECT DRIVE .
.3
ACTUAL
.04
.26
.22
N/A
72
55
17
TEST DATE: 9/8-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97VVCA
- tab 4 -38
NE:BB
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
_ U
MakelModd N0.
Typeosm
1 Serial Number
Arr.IC>ass
DW:hwp
Make Sheave
i Sheave Di em/Bor e
NO. BellZakstiZe
No- FiUerRypeft aze
i
'Total CFM _
Register Total
Fen RPM
i Motor RPM
Motor Volts
Motor Valts
Motor Volta
_ I
Mawr Ampe
Motor Amps
Motor Amps
CFLA
!_BHP
I
1 Outside Air CFM
Return Alr CFM
REMARKS:
_ TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab 4-38
T7 7C1HJ
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB SYSTEM /UNIT:
BOILER ROOM
DATA
1 M'
MAGIC AIRE
MskelFreme
DHW -400
H.P.
970292227
IRPM
HW FAN COIL
7 Volts
HOR I ZONTAL
PheeelHertz
DIRECT DRIVE
F.I -Amps
S.LAmpe
Temp. dift.
Sheave Diem/Bore
1- 24X12X1
Sheave Dim►
Sheave CA. Dietar►oe
DESIGN {
ACTUAL
TEST _DA i i
400
400
1 EA Discharge S.P.
485 Ext Suction S.P.
837 I External S.P.
LOW SPD
FAN SUCTION S.P.
Heating
115
119
I..AT
EAT
I
Temp. dift.
2.1 1 .9
GPM
EVNT
LWT
Temp. dff.
100 �RA SA Damper Pos.
Damper Pos_
9/8 -12/9
97VVCA
1WnTNHH»W amn -1SNn1
READINGS BY:
AIR APPARATUS
TEST REPORT
FC--12
DATA
GE -- - -.
1 /10
955
115 �_ _.....
1/
2.1
DIRECT DRIVE
3 SPD
DESIGN AC_ TUAL.
0�O FEE M
.10 _ . _....._. _. -
.50" .10 _..
I .27
90 140
-15 73
105 67
1.5 1 -
190 169
150 148
40 21
wMjcTW f l
VE9L- ZVZ -0L6 Z0 =81 8661 /VZ /11
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 - 7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 22
- r FAN TEST REPORT
NE BB
PROJECT VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
FAN DATA FAN NO. ! FAN NO. FAN NO.
Fan Number EF -1 EF -2 EF -3
t ROOF ROOF ROOF
* BASEMENT ! KITCHEN RESTROOMS -
MarmAncOxer E ACME ACME RCME
Model Number PNN2 0 0 QBR161 PNN 1 3
Serial Number PV3960391 i Pv136505 7777 4PVB . 396503
Typ Klass DOME UTILTIY DOME
Motor Mskefiype I MARATHON I MAGNETEK MAGNETEK
MaW HP 1 1 3 3/4
'RPM 1 1725 i 1745 . 11725
voks ! 115/208/230 1 2081230/460 ,208/230/115
PhaeNNertr. 1/60 3/60 1/60
FLA Amps 12.8/6.4 i9.8/ 4.5 5.4/5.5/11
Motor Sheew 0wdBore 4.25" X 5/8" 6 X 1 1/8# 4.25 X 5/8'
Fan 3heays Di ffiors 5. 7 5" X 1" 5 X 1• 3.75" X 3/4'
No- 9e1t9/Make/Size { 1-A30 1-A37 1-3L260
Sheave CL Distance 8 ^ 9 . 5 - 7- 1
TEST DATA DESIGN ACTUALI DESIGN I ACTUAL DESIGN 1 ACTUAL
ci=M 2800 2897 1 3600 3758 1600 1 1511
Fen RPM 1204 2008 2227 1553 1645
i Motor RPM 1711 1763 1743
S.P.Inbe
-1.0 ', -2.3
S.P.DFsc 0
ToW S. P 1-13 1.0 1.75 2.3 J. 1.05
vottar 208 206 208 209 208 209
A mps 5.4 9.8 6.0 5.4 4.2
Amps 6.3
Amps 6.3
GFLA
I attp
REMARKS: EF--1 MOTOR AT MAXIMUM, MOTOR SLOW IF AMPS INCREASED -
EF-1 REGISTER TOTAL HIGHER THAN FAN DESIGN.
EF -3 REGISTER TOTAL LOWER THAN FAN ORSIGN-
TEST DATE: 9/11/97 READINGS BY: C . GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97VVCF
_
tab 8-89
AIR CUTLET TEST REPORT
NE_ BB
PROJECT VAIL VILLAGE CLUB --
SYSTEM EF -1 AND EF -3
u et Design Prel. Final
Area �_, es�e r.Fitu r-FM CFM %
5ervea n
I TWO
- -
-
i EF -1 �
TUNNING E1
LOCKERS E2
': LOCKERS I E3
MENS SHOWER E4
WOMENS SHOWER E5!
MENS E6
WOMENS I E7
(JANITOR E8 !
BR -3
BR -2
BR -4
BR -1
BR - 1
DR -1
BR -1
BR -1
BR -
I
TOTAL
3001 231' 197: 66
550 $65 591 91 %
1450 885: 1211 B4 °k
100 115; 99 99%
100! 88' 9 9
1001 8 S 9 6 96%
10 0 ! 103 10 0 00 °6
50 I 65 ! 50 : 1oa °�
500 ! 85 i 461 92%
'
3350 2523' 2897 a6 %
(ELECTRICAL
1 i
E9
I
I i
. EF -3 i
;ELEV. EQ. RM.
ICOMPACTOR
F S — TOR 10 8 I
HALLWAY
RETAIL #3
MENS 113
WOMENS 115
MENS 2ND FL
WOMENS 2ND FL
MENS 3RD FL
WOMENS 3RD FL
I
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E8
E7
E8
ES
Flo
E17
BR -1
BR -1
BR -1
BR -1
BR -6
BR
BR-3
BR--1
BR - 1
BR -1
BR -1
TOTAL
150
250
100
100
200
50
50
150
200
150
100
1500
-
170' 148' 99%
197 2341 94 % :
1521 103! 103%
110` 1071 107%
257 204 , 102°,6
59 531 106%
62 5 6 i 1 12 %..
152 1661 111%
162 184+ 9296
145 160 t079�°
1081 96 1 96%
1574 15111 101 %:
i
i
i
_
w.�rn T/•,
AI TIT( If1G'
{
READINGS ARE VWH FLOW muuu AND ARE vvRncv i r-w 1 v
REMARKS: REGISTER TOTAL HIGHER THAN FAN DESIGN TOTAL CFM.
EF - OPERATING AT MAXIMUM ON MOTOR.
TEST DATE: 9/9/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97wcH1
tab hoods
._, --- - 1H - :1W rrt )4n4cz VE9L- 6V6 -0L6 Z0 =8T 866106/TT
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634
NE BB
LUNSFORD MECHANICAL
PAGE 24
FAN TEST REPORT
PROJECT
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
i=LA Amps k 2.3 1 2.3
Mot or Sheave DiaJBore I DIRECT DRIVE DIRECT DRIVE
Fan Sheave Dia./Bore I I
- - --
FAN DATA
i FAN NO. I
FAN NO.
I FAN NO. _
Fan N umber
EV -4
EF -5
EF -6
Loc ation
DINING 3
DINING 2
DINING 1
Serwe
SAME
SAME
i SAME _.. --
Manufac
' ACME
ACME
I ACME
1 V -300
Model N umbe r
I V -300
V -300
_
Sena/ Number
N/A N/A N/A
CEILING EXHAUSTER! CEILING EXHAUSTER; CEILING EXHAUS
TypeiClass
Motor MakelType
1 ENCLOSED
I ENCLOSED
!ENCLOSED
MototHP
1 165 WATTS
165 WATTS
!165 WATTS
RPM
_Volts 1 120 120 1
Phase/Hertz 1 1/60 ; 1/60
__ ....
120 _ .._.. .
1/60 __ - --
i=LA Amps k 2.3 1 2.3
Mot or Sheave DiaJBore I DIRECT DRIVE DIRECT DRIVE
Fan Sheave Dia./Bore I I
DIRECT DRIVE
--
No. Belte/Make/size
Sheave CL Oistance
TES DATA
CFM
Fen RPM
DESIGN ACTUAL.
300 224
HIGHEST
DESIGN
300
ACTUAL
236 1
HIGHEST
DESIGN ! ACTUAL_
300 195 _
I HIGHEST
i
I
NO
NO
NO
J'
S.P.Inle t
S.P.Diecharge
rotalS.P
.125
ACCESS
ABOVE
.125
ACCESS
ABOVE
.125
ACCESS__
ABOVE
I Voltage
115
12 0
115
12 0
115
120
r
2.3
1.4
2.3
1.4
2.3
1.4
i
Amps
Amps
r
I Amps
CFLA
_
BHP
REMARKS: No SPEED CONTROLLERS INSTALLED.
NO ACCESS IN ATTIC SPACE, EDD ARE OPENING-
TEST DATE: 9/11/97 READINGS BY: C - GORMAN
FILE NAME: 97WCF
tab 8-83
- NE BB
PROJECT
PUMP TEST REPORT
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
PUMP DATA PUMP NO.
PUMP NO.
PUMP NO.
Pump Number I P -1
U,. I BOILER ROOM
P-2
BOILER ROOM
—!
8arvioe I MAIN BOILER LOOP
MAIN SOILER
M,uiufoetunr B &G I
B &G
Modal Number ; 60 SERIES 2A -6PF 1
60 SERIES 2A -6PF
SeriN Number 2042924
2 042925
Gp;M i 80/30
80/30
Rpq, NPSH
Pump RPM I 1800
IrnpeNer Die ; 6"
Mew MfrdF i MAGNETEK
jyowHPJRPM 1 1.5/1725
1800
6 "
MAGNETEK
1.5/1725
;vim
208/230/115
208/230/115
PhaWHortz
1/60
1/60
;p !
7.8/7.5/15
7.8/7.5/15
i
Seat Type I
1 TEST DATA
MECH
ACTUAL
MECH
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
=. Off 4Nvo s.
I velve Shut Diff.
20 PSI 19 PSI
16.8 PSI / 38.8' 16.8 PSI / 38.8
Act. impeller Diem_
Val" om01".
ve Open GPM
nts
Final Dindw. Prow.
Final Suction Prow
69 6"
12.5 PSI/ 29' 12.5 PSI/ 29'
9 0 9 0
3 0. 5 PSI 30.5 PS I
17.5 PSI 17.5 PSI
i
Final Dlff, Pros,
13 PSI/ 30. 13 PSI / 30'
Friel GPM
85 85
vi
M"
209 209
5.2 5 . 2
RPM
1750 1754
REMARKS:
_ TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tob 18.83
9/10 -12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
97VVCP
/bZ /ZZ
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 26
SERIES fa PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVES
PERFCRUANCE CHARACTEPISTIC CURVE
70 C K ENIPIFUG FVW SHRUM 60 bpr-p.d Clog* 9-7 -A7
20-,
Wi5` SO art 1 I
i W 1
a
J z
9 20 a
0 5 p I I 440Z I
{ 10 I } •.o �y 40 r I C I
I I I I o � '
C 20 4 4 60 80 100 120 140 1 60 I
CAPACITY IN U.S. NS PER MINUTE {.
a 5 1a 1s 20 25 30 35 40
CAPAC)'TY IN CUBIC METIVISMR I
I
i
NOTE: Maximum Suction Pressure an Single Phase Units Qniy
112HP — 65 PSI
3 /4HP — 105 PSI
i
I
For kditr Inkm adon, aMIW ITT M 8 Gossett, 8200 N. Austin Avenue, Marton Grow IL 60053,
i Phone, (708) 966- 3700 -- ftmimft (700) 965 - 9052. 1
i
Bell & Gossett
powf£oitU.S.A.6 -" I TT IYT Fluid Tachnojogy Coromtion
NE:BB
PROJECT
PUN
Pump Number
_ ! Location
service -
i Manufacturer
Model Number
i
Send Number
GP -- M lead
Rsq- NPSH_
Pump RPM
lmoeiler Dia.
Motor HP/RPM
unft
AmpWS.F-
Seal TyPe
_ TEST DATA
- 1 Pump, Orr- Press.
V alve Shut pill
Act. lrnPdw Dism.
valve open DiK.
Valve Open GPM
Final Olec - Press•
Final Suction Press-
- Final Diff . Press.
Finial GPM
T
REMARKS;
TEST DATE:
FILE NAME:
tab 1"3
PUMP TEST REPORT
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
— -
TA PUMP NO. I
PUMP NO.
-
PUMP NO -
P- 3
P -4 l
P-5 --
i BOILER ROOM i
BOILER ROOM
BOILER ROOM
HEATING LOOP
FMATING LOOP
SNOWMELT _
B &G !
B &G
B &G _ -- -
! SERIES 60 1.5A iSERIES
60 1.5A iSERIES
60 1 . 5A
1 172543
172543 ;
2044669
40/45
40145
30/40
1800 1180Q
1800 �.
6.8
6.8 1
6.375 -- ._.._.
ITT / B &G I
ITT / B &G
Mp,GNETEFC
1.5/1725
1.5/1725 :1/1725
115/230
115/230 1208/230/115
_
1/60 ,
1/60
1 1/60 - - --
18/9 1
I
18/9
1 7.216,5/13
I MECH I MECH
I MECH
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
1 18.75 PSI
18.75 PSI
20 PSI
25 PSI/ 57.8'
25 PSI/ 57.8'
20.5PSI/47.4'
6.8
6.8
6.4"
16 PSI/ 37'
16 PSI/ 37'
18 PSI/ 41.6' _
57
57
33
42 PSI
42 PSI
37.5 PSI
23 PSI
23 PSI
19.5 PSI
19 PS11 44'
19 PSI/ 44'
18 PSI /41.6'
45
210
45
33
} 211
211
6.4
5.4
5.0 —�
1745
1747
1747
9/10-12/97 READINGS BY: C. GORMAN
97VVCP
17 - 1H:)TNVH7 - �W GNOASNn - 1 b69L- ZbZ -0L6 Z0 :8T 8662 /bZ /TT
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 28
L/ - -
SERIES 60 PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVES
ci[,v* MALA . PLAW so+ LES 60 A..r.w.d A+.s 5 -20-92
is
.
M
7
Q 1Q
F
o:
t
y
N
i
s
� I
0 a0
i
i
Fa fimoMW W*MM WL caatrcs m ed & CpmotL &MG N- AVOW Avorms. Maa Grows. L =3&
t
ITT Bell $Gossett
Nwrr�q .w u ax sus fTT Fluid Tedv,olo4v Coeporatlon
4�.41ry M N.7.4KL0�� � �t
0 y 10 1s
car.cm w cum mWowwe
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634 LUNSFORD MECHANICAL PAGE 29
vo!l-oduoa �>yOl l p° L!1
�ass�J'8 lfaa ��
xQOb s� (gad •aw�•� -�- ooct -aoe acv •mod
'ESD� 'p `MaD �W 'www+/ glsnr/ 'N OOii 'J 4 poB 11J F>� ' JD +a�
us vn oo osurw
I
�
mm
I ry
� "�� Vii . �'�?�!1��1
r
�
x
f �
� Fi
11/24/1998 18:02 970 - 242 -7634
NE: BB
PROJECT
_. LOCATION
SERVICE
- -i OR
DESIGNATION
P -1 OR P -2
P -3 OR P -4
MAU - 1
;MAU -2
Fc - 1
IF -2
FC -3
FC -8
jFC -
L.�
jP -5 SNOWMI
i RRMATT. FRC
; tiAL( -ur4 % Gttlil r i,
- BALCON 4TH FL
REAR PATIO
EAST BALCONY_ 4'
- I SO. BALCONY 4
VAIL VILAGE CLUB
LUNSFORD MECHANICAL
PAGE 30
BALANCING VALVE /FLOW
METER TEST REPORT
SYSTEM
REMARKS:
TEST DATE
ACTUAL NOTES
GPM
CAN'T
9/10 -12/9 READING_ BY C. GOR'N
i4
Vail Corporation
P.O. Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
Linda Malaby
610 West Lionshead Circle
Suite 100
Vail, CO 81657
Bridge Street Condo Association
281 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12 -3 -6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on January 11, 1999, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A worksession to discuss an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon),
revising the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road West /Lot
54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
A request cur a Type II Employee Housing Unit at a proposed primary/secondary residence,
located at 95 Forest Road / Lot 32, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Philip Hoversten, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
Planner: Jeff Hunt
A request for a vgrianr.P from Section 12- 713-13, Town of Municipal Code, to allow for the
conversion of existing floor space to gross residential floor area (GRFA), located at 333 Bridge
treet / A portion of Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: The Remonov Company, represented by Braun & Associates
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
, u , ;yti u y � ,,,,.., available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 47a-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published December 25, 1998 in the Vail Trail.
IRsi g n Review AdAn Form
TOWN OF VAIL
'' TOWN OF VAIL
Project Name: Vail Village Club
Project Description: Rooftop mechanical screening
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect /Contact, Address and Phone: Gies Architects, Edwards Village Center, D21, Edwards,
Co., 81623
Project Street Address:
Legal Description: Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing
Parcel Number:
Comments:
Building Name: Vail Village Club
Board / Staff Action
Motion by: Pierce Action: Approved
Seconded by: Woldrich
Vote: 5 -0
Conditions: No new mechanical equipment shall be added, all existing equipment shall be painted
the same color as the existing chimneys. No new building permits shall be issued until
the painting is completed.
Town Planner: George Ruther
Date: 9/2/98
DRB Fee Pre -Paid
$20.00
TOWN O W AIL ,
Project Name: Vail Village Club Front Entry Remodel
Project Description: New Front Entry
Owner, Address and Phone-
Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Gies Architects, Inc., P.O. Box 807, Edwards, Colorado
81632 926 -9280
Project Street Address: 333 Bridge Street
Legal Description: lot c, block 2, Vail Village #1
Parcel Number: Building Name: Vail Village Club
Comments:
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Board / Staff Action
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Vote: 5 -0
Conditions:
Woldrich
Pierce
Action: approved
approved as submitted with the condition that all the roof top mechanical equipment
be screened.
Town Planner: George Ruther
Date: 8/26/98
DRB Fee Pre -Paid: $50.00
F:\ EVERYONE \DRB\APPROVAL\98 \WCLUB.826
Questions? II the Planning Staff at 479 -2128
Toly,
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL 0 l
T� u
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any project requiring Design Rcvicw approval. Any project requiring design review must
information, sec the submittal
receive Design Rcvicw approval prior to submitting for a building permit. For specific
requirements for the particular approval that is requested. The application cannot he accepted until all the required
information is submitted. The project may also need to be reviewed by the "Town Council and /or the planning and
Environmental Commission. Design Review Board approval expires one year after final approval unless a
building; permit is issued and construction is started.
A. DESCRIPTION OF' 'I I REQUEST:
l
I3, LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT: C I3LOCK: PILING: Vai Vi LLaLL XD i
_ '
PHYSICAL ADDRI?SS:
C. PARCEL it. 210108242001 _ (Contact Eagle Co. Assessors Office at 970 - 328 -8640 for parcel #)
D. ZONING: — _A3_, R2 —
I NAME OF OWNER(S): ppmnnml�, Inc
MAILING ADDRESS: PQ Bnx 188 \
wardG , 81632 PIIONE: 970 - 926 -622 —
F.
0 W N E 11 (S) SIGNA'TUR[i.(S): _ ____�—
G. NAME OF AI'I'LICANT:_ G ies Arc
MAILING ADDRESS:—P Box 807
Edwards, CO X31632
PHONE: 970-926-928 —
I I. TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEE:
❑ New C oll sh•uctioil - $200 Construction of a new building.
[2 Addition - S50 Includes any addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building.
El Minor Alteration - $20 includes minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining
Willis, ctc.
DRB fees are to be paid at the time of submittal. Later, when applying fora building permit, please identify
the accurate valuation of the project. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the project valuation.
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL P.LQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
2
F r ffk Use Only � C � � S
'cc Paid: ° ° ('K#: Hy: —
Applicntien C).3te: DR13 Meeting Date: _� ? 5 —
Pre- Application Meting Date: ---
m
J AST OF PROPOSED MATERIALS
BU11 DING MATERIALS TYPE OF MATERIAL
Roof
Co bbe?' Standing Pam
Siding
u S. Cedar
Other Wall Materials
_ E I F S _l SL
Fascia
R . S . Cedar
Soffits
T & G R S Cedar
Windows
Metal Clad
Window Trim
Mnqq Pork
Doors
Glass Storefront
Door Trim
Moss Rock
land or Deck Rails
N/A —
Flues -
Flashings Copper
Chimneys N/A
Trash Enclosures N/ A
Greenhouses N/A —
Retaining Walls Moss Rock
Exterior Lighting *
Other
N/A
COLOR
M tr•h RYi Qtincl
Match E -t i nrr
Match Exis ina
Match Fxi ct i nn
Forest (nrPex-)-
N/A
N/A
N/A
* Please specify the manufacturer's color, number and attach a small color chip
** All exterior lighting must meet the Town's Lighting Ordinance 18.54.0500). If exterior lighting is proposed,
please indicate the number of fixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identify each fixture type and provide
the height above grade, lumens output, luminous area, and attach a cut sheet of the lighting fixtures.
2 Updated 6/97
PPO POSED LANDSCAPING
Bot anical Nanlc
_Common Name
lan i X ii
PROPOSED TREES N/A
AND SHRUBS:
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED: Picea Punaens __ s r_uc-e — 7 r,
* M111111111111 regUil C1llCI1tS for landscaping: deciduous trees - 2 inch caliper
coniferous trees - 6 feet in height
shrubs - 5 gallons
Tnic S� uarc Foota:>_
GROUND COVER N/A
SOD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate top and
bottom elevations of retaining walls. Max imurn height of walls within the front setback is 3 feet. Maximum height of
walls elsewhere on the property is 6 feet.
3 Updated 6/97
A pre- aprplication conference with Town been completed. It Is the applic a ppl ic a t io n t ti�r ponsibility to�tclaedulesthihe
mandatory pre- appbc,ation mcctmg hash {
meeting by calling 970- 479 -2128.
II. TIME RE UfREMf: F
The Design Rcvicw Board meets on the 1st and 3
pted We d n esdays
e m onth. A
ent ent
form and all accompanying material must be i c p Y
niininnim of three and a half (3 1/2) weeks prior to the date of the DRB public hearing.
Ill. RFViE CRITERIA
nce with the Design Guidelines as set forth in Section 18.54 of the
Your proposal will be reviewed for complia
Municipal CoCIC.
IV, NOTE TO ALL APPLICANTS:
A. if a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, floodplain, debris
flow, wetland, etc), a hazard study must be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit
recognizing the hazard report prior to the issuance of a building permit. Applicants are encouraged
to check with the planning staff prior to submittal of a DRB application to determine the relationship
of the property to all mapped hazards.
Basic Plan Shect Format. For all surveys, site plans, landscape plans and other site improvements
plans, all of the following must be shown.
1. Plan sheet size must be 24 "x 36 ". For large projects, larger plan size may be allowed.
2. Scale. Thr, mininuim scale is 1 " =20'. All plans must be at the same scale.
3. Graphic bar scale.
4. North arrow.
5. Titie block, prv_ject name, Project address and legal description.
6. indication of plan preparer, address and phone number.
7. Dates of original plan preparation and all revision dates.
8. Vicinity map or location 111,11) at a scale of I"= 1,000' or larger.
9. Shect labels and numbers.
10 , A border with a mininuun left side margin of 1.5 ".
11. Names of all adjacent roadways.
12. Plan legend.
C. For new construction and additions, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate
property lines, proposed buildings and building corners. All trees to be removed must be taped. The
applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. All site tapings
and staking must be completed prior to the day of the DRB meeting.
D. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and
who have not asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items
removed from the DRB agenda until such time as the item has been republished.
E. if the DRB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval
must be resolved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
t C
Updated 6/97
TiL1T ' " OCATiON VERIFICATION
This form is to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction
with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. The location and availability of utilities, whether
they be main trunk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following utilities for the
accompanying site plan.
U.S. West Conununications
1 -800 -922 -1997
468 -6860 or 949 -4530
Public Service Company
949 -5781
Gary Hall
Iloly Cross Electric Assoc.
949 -5892
Ted Flunky /John Boyd
T.C.1.
949 -5530
Floyd Salazar
Eagle River Water
& Sanitation District
476 -7480
Fred I laslec
Authorized Si i iture Date
* Please bring a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation
signatures. Fire flow needs must be addressed.
NOTES:
if the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies, wid no
comments arc made directly on the form, the Town will presume that there arc no problems and
the development can proceed.
2. if a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative shall
note directly on the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved.
The issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please
keep in mind that it is the responsibility of khp utility company and the applicant to resolve
identified problems.
These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to obtain a Public Way
Permit from the Department of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utility locations must be
obtained before diegin in any public right -of -way or casement within the Town of Vail. A
building permit is not a Public Way permit and must be obtained separately
1. PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE
f !
4 Updated 6/97
V. STAFF APPROVAL
The Administrator may review and approve Dsign Review a n Re , app for with deci sion . rt liAllnod nations, staff
deny the application, or may refer the applicatio
approvals are subject to final approval by the DRB. "file following types of Design Review applications may
be staff approved:
A. Any application for an addition to al, nd app been r c onsistent w ' aluthori�ed ►member of desi gn,
materials and colors of the burldrng, a pp oval h
condominium association, if applicable;
B. Any application to modify an existing building that does not significantly change the existing planes
of the building and is generally consistent with the architectural design, materials and colors of the
building, including, but not limited to exterior building finish materials ( e.g. stonework, siding, roof
materials, paint or stain,), exterior lighting, canoeres or awnings, fences, antennas,
satellite dishes,
windows, skylights, siding, minor commercial facade improvements, and other similar modifications;
C Any application for site improvements or modifications including, but not limited to, driveway
modifications, site grading, site walls removal or modifications to existing l andscaping, installation
of accessory stnrctures or recreational facilities.
VI. ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES
A. If this application requires a separate review by `ii bb200�QO c � ► l'a$mpleS of other
y
Town of Vail, the application fee shall be y
include, but are not limited to: Colorado Department of 1- Iighway Access permits, Army Corps of
Engineers 404, ctc.
B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess of 50% of the
application fee. If, at the applicant's request, any matter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter
to be re- published, then the entire fee for such re- publication shall be paid by the applicant.
C Applications deemed by the Conumunity Development Department to have design, land use or other
issues which may have a significant impact on the community may require review by consulta.11ts in
addition to Town staff. Should a determination be made by the Town staff that an outside consultant
is needed, the Community Development Department may hire the consultant. The Department shall
estiniatc the amount of money necessary to pay the consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to
the Town by the applicant at the time of filing an application. Expenses incurred by the Town in
excess of the amount forwarded by the application shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within
30 days of notification by the Town. Any excess funds will be returned to the applicant upon review
completion.
6 Updated 6/97
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW
TOWS
GENERAL INFORMATION
The conceptual review is intended to give the applicant a basic understanding of the compatibility of
the proposal with the Town's Design Guidelines. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews.
Complete, applications must be submitted two (2) weeks prior to a scheduled DRB meeting.
II. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
❑ A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum scale of 1 " =20' or larger;
❑ Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials and a description of the character
of the proposed structure or structures;
❑ Completed DRB application form.
❑ Condominium Association approval (if applicable)
111. PROCEDURE
Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, the Department of Community
Development shall review the submitted materials for general compliance with the
appropriate requirements of the zoning code. If the proposal is in basic compliance with the
zoning code requirements, the project shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptual review.
If the application is not generally in compliance with zoning code requirements, the
application and submittal materials shall be returned to the applicant with a written
explanation as to why the Community Development Department staff has found the project
not to be in compliance with zoning code requirements.
Once a complete application has been received, the DRB shall review the submitted
conceptual review application and supporting material in order to determine whether or not
the project generally complies with the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote on
conceptual reviews. The property owner or a representative abAU be present at the DRB
hearing.
Questions? Call the Planning Staff at 479 -2138
TOW]
, LPPLICATION FOR PLANNING A J ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION APPROVAL
FAT � '6 - , 6 1 )- I
GENE AL INFORMATION
This application is for any project requiring approval by the Planning and Environmental Commission. For specific
information, see the submittal requirements for the particular apa- sted. The application can not be
accepted until all required information is submitted. The project reviewed by the Town Council
and/or the Design Review Board. a JM
A: TYPE OF APPLICATION:
❑
Additional GRFA (250)
❑
Bed and Breakfast
❑
Conditional Use Permit
❑
Major or ❑ Minor Subdivision
❑
Rezoning
❑
Sign Variance
.
E�
Variance
❑
Zoning Code Amendment
w
WrbrM -�Iisnor p evelopment Plan
nit (Type: )
CCI Exterior Alteration
(Vail Village)
• Major or ❑ Minor CCII Exterior Alteration
(Lionshead)
• Special Development District
• Major or ❑ Minor Amendment to an SDD
B. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: A c ed ; n -
>c s .✓ l� V IE V C C L A A ti
C. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT C BLOCK L FILING I
ADDRESS: 3 � � 150 o yE S r • BUILDING NAME:
t L- V I L' c.. ^ Cr a - — (
D. ZONING: GC `r
E. NAME OF OWNER(S): - I' G P- C) r , ::F I` J C
MAILING ADDRESS:
C- 0�✓R -�.o S Go _ _8 16 3 2.- PHONE: r'I Z 6
F
G
OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE:
A a2 $ A P / -
-I c5 A/SC H iC
S�
MAILING ADDRESS: _ P� Q ° k 6 7 ?
C- 6 wg NO r 60 S t 3 L PHONE: 5 z 2 8 v
H.
FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
For Office Use Only: ,k - -
Fee Paid: z r'p ' ° ° Ck#: � L By:
Application Date: 6 '" Z 2 -9 PEC Meeting
21450 l) - c1-i J-05 -`7 $ VeC� // to
;
,3./ 6 S
Revixd 6/96
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A VARIANCE
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE
A pre- application conference with a planning staff member is strongly encouraged. No application
can be accepted unless it is complete. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment
with the staff to determine additional submittal requirements.
II. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
❑ FEE: $250.00. The fee must be paid at the time of submittal.
❑ Stamped, addressed envelopes and a list of the names and mailing addresses of all property owners
adjacent to the subject property, including properties behind and across streets. The applicant is
responsible for correct names and mailing addresses. This information is available from the Eagle
County Assessor's office.
❑ A written statement of the precise nature of the variance requested and the specific regulation
involved.
❑ A written statement addressing the following:
• The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures
in the vicinity.
• The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among
sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
• The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic
facilities, utilities, and public safety.
• How your request complies with Vail's Comprehensive Plan.
❑ A preliminary title report, including schedules A and B, to verify ownership and casements.
❑ Condominium Association approval (if applicable).
❑ Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as determined by the
Administrator.
Four (4) copies of the following
❑ A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least V = 20' stamped by a
Colorado licensed surveyor including locations of all existing improvements, including
grades and elevations. Other elements which must be shown are parking and loading areas,
ingress and egress, landscaped areas and utility and drainage features.
13 A site plan at a scale of at least 1" = 20' showing existing and proposed buildings.
Page 1 of 2
❑ Building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance,
scale and use of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed on the site.
* For interior modifications, an improvement survey and site plan may be waived by the Administrator
III. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS CAN BE ACCEPTED. ALL OF
THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ORDER FOR THiS
APPLICATION TO BE DEEMED COMPLETE.
iV. TIME REQUIREMENTS
A. The Planning and Environmental Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each
month. A complete application form and all accompanying material (as described above)
must be accepted by the Community Development Department by the appropriate submittal
date, which is a mininuun of four (4) weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearing.
Incomplete applications (as determined by the planning staff) will not be accepted.
B. All PEC approved variances shall lapse if construction is not commenced within one year of
the date of approval and diligently pursued to completion, or if the use for which the
approval is granted is not commenced within one year.
V. ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES
A. If this application requires a separate review by any local, State or Federal agency other than
the Town of Vail, the application fee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of such
review, may include, but arc not limited to: Colorado Department of Highway Access
Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
B. The applicant shall be responsible'for paying any publishing fees which are in excess of
50% of the application fee. If, at the applicant's request, any matter is postponed for
hearing, causing the matter to be re- published, then, the entire fee for such re- publication
shall be paid by the applicant.
C. Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have design, land use
or other issues which may have a significant impact on the community may require review
by consultants in addition to Town staff. Should a determination be made by the Town staff
that an outside consultant is needed, the Community Development Department may hire the
consultant. The Department shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay the
consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time of
filing an application. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by
the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of notification by the
Town. Any excess funds will be returned to the applicant upon review completion.
Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 24, 1998
SUBJECT: A request for a minor CC1 Exterior Alteration and site coverage variance for a
proposed entryway at the Vail Village Club, located at 333 Bridge Street/ Lot C,
Block 2, Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Remonov, Inc., represented by Geis Architects
Planner: George Ruther /Christie Barton
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval for a new entryway for the Vail Village Club. The building
was constructed in 1 and the owners are interested in improving the visibility of the access.
The alteration will be two stories in height and includes a display window on the ground level.
The proposal will add 75 square feet of commercial floor area to the building. The proposal
increases the site coverage by 53.5 sq. ft., which exceeds the 80% allowable by 543 sq. ft. In
1994, the PEC approved a variance for 489.5 sq. ft. (90.5 %) of site coverage.
No additional parking is required by this application. A modification to the existing easement
agreement will be completed as the second floor of the entryway extends over Town property by
24 sq. ft. The addition is on the north side and therefore has no impact on the 50' Gore Creek
centerline setback and the 100 -year floodplain, as currently mapped. The design maintains the
existing color and texture of the existing building.
The application received a conceptual review by the Design Review Board on August 19, 1998.
The Board requested the roof pitch be shallower to match existing roof line and that the truss
element be simplified. The Board directed Staff to approve the application if approved by the
PEC.
il. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Commercial Core 1 (CC1)
Lot size: 4,646 sq. ft.
Commercial
Floor area:
Allowed Existing Proposed
no limit
on floor area 9,405 sq. ft.
9,480 sq. ft.
Site coverage
80% of site 90.5% of site
3,717 sq. ft. 4,205 sq. ft.
91.6% of site
4,258.5 sq. ft.
f
TOWN vnr v
r 0
III. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THIS REQUEST
The code criteria for review of such a request are provided for your information. Staff has
included the purpose statement from the zoning code, as we believe this will help the PEC in its
evaluation of the request.
The Vail Village Club is located in the Commercial Core 1 (CC1) zone district. According to Title
12, Chapter 7B of the Zoning Regulations, the purpose of the CC1 district is:
The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique
character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial
establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1
District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities
appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in
accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations
prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and
preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on
pedestrianways and public green ways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale
and architectural qualities that distinguish the Village. (Ord. 21(1980) § 1)
Any exterior alterations are required to prove the proposal is in compliance with the purposes of
the CC1 Zone District as specified in Section 12 -78-1 of this Article; that the proposal is
consistent with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master Plan, the Town of Vail
Streetscape Master Plan, and the Vail Comprehensive Plan; and that the proposal does not
otherwise negatively alter the character of the neighborhood. Further, that the proposal
substantially complies with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Design
Considerations, to include, but not be limited to the following urban design considerations:
pedestrianization, vehicular penetration, streetscape framework. street enclosure, street edge,
building height, views, service /delivery and sun /shade analysis; and that the proposal
substantially complies with all other elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
The approval of an exterior alteration shall constitute approval of the basic form and location of
improvements including siting, building setbacks, height, building bulk and mass, site
improvements and landscaping.
IV. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION
1. Vail Village Master Plan
The Vail Village Club is in the Seibert Circle Study Area. This plan will remove one tree
in a small landscape planter. The planter was not designed for an evergreen tree to
grow to full size. The proposal will not change any of the existing sun exposure areas
and will maintain the existing access and circulation patterns.
The addition of the entry vestibule and display case will enhance the pedestrian
experience. The creation of the new entry vestibule will assist in drawing the public to
continuing their walking to the open space along Mill Creek and to Mill Creek Court.
2. Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan
The Streetscape Master Plan identifies the following issues to be addressed:
1) Existing pedestrian character to be maintained and enhanced
2) Enhance an already exciting walking experience
This proposal improves the pedestrian experience by adding a display window
and improving the visibility of the entrance to the Vail Village Club.
3. Vail Comprehensive Plan
The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible. Although this is a new building, the existing entryway is subtle and
difficult to find. Improving the entryway will make it easier for people to find the
entrance to the building.
4. Character of the Neighborhood
The alteration of the entrance to the building by adding a new entry vestibule and
display case with the integration of the existing landscape planter will increase
visibility and connection to the street and in return enhance the pedestrian
environment. The proposal will not effectively reduce the volume of space along
the two pedestrian streets or the square, and the addition of the vestibule and
display case will articulate the space and create focal points at the pedestrian
level.
5. Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
This proposal conforms to Sub -Area Concepts #9, 11, 15 and 18 by improving
the pedestrian scale of the building. The transparency of the fagade is increased
with the addition of the display case, which in turn strengthens the pedestrian
activity. The new entryway continues to be oriented to the pedestrian access
areas and has increased visibility for ease of access.
6. Vail Village Design Considerations
The quality of the pedestrian way is increased through the addition of a more
central architectural focal point. Landscaping has been reduced minimally to
introduce a display case that replaced a void on the fagade. This also enhances
the framework, and articulation is added to the building to create additional visual
interest and activity.
The general characteristics of the 'outdoor room' are unchanged. An entry
vestibule and display case have been added to create a pedestrian focus and
divert attention from upper building heights. The proposed shape of the building
has additional articulation to create greater visual interest. The new entry
vestibule and display case will create welcome protection from rain or snow when
'window shopping' or simply pausing while walking through the Village.
The proposal will not adversely affect views or shadow patterns.
V. VARIANCE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Title 12, Chapter 17 -6, Criteria and Findings, of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the
requested site coverage variance. The recommendation for approval is based upon on
the following factors:
A. Consideration of Factors:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or
potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
Staff believes the variance request will have no negative impacts on the
relationship to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity
of The Vail Village Club or Seibert Circle. The request for the additional
53.5 square feet of site coverage will result in an improved streetscape
and pedestrian experience along Hansons Ranch Road and will not
interfere with the operation of the existing businesses on adjacent
properties.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity
or to attain the objectives of the title without grant of special
privilege.
Staff believes the applicant is requesting the minimum amount of relief
from the site coverage limitation to obtain compatibility and uniformity
amongst the sites in the vicinity of the Vail Village Club. Staff does not
believe that the granting of the variance request will result in a grant of
special privilege since the intent of the development standards is being
met. The site coverage limitation of 80% was intended, in part, to ensure
that an adequate amount of the site was left undeveloped to permit areas
for landscaping and streetscape. The applicants request to increase the
site coverage percentage by 1.1 % has few negative impacts on the
landscape area of the Vail Village Club. The planter was not designed to
accommodate a full grown tree in the planter.
Staff further believes that the request does not constitute a grant of
special privilege since the addition proposed by the applicant furthers the
goals and objectives of the master plans of the Town of Vail without
resulting in negative impacts on adjacent properties or uses. As
discussed previously in this memorandum, the applicant's proposal
implements many of the recommendations proposed in the Towns Master
Plans. As stated in the Vail Village Master Plan, "Vail Village has not
escaped the aging process. There is a need to encourage the continued
upgrading and enhancement of existing lodging and commercial facilities
within the Village in order to maintain the unique character that is its main
attraction.'
Lastly, staff believes that while it is always possible to design and
construct a building that is in full compliance with the Zoning Code, it is
not always practical or reasonable to do so.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
Staff believes the variance request will have no negative impacts on light
and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities,
public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the followin findings
before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties classified in
the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict and literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the site of the variance that does not
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
C. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
other properties in the same district.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Minor Exterior Alteration
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the request for a
minor exterior alteration in Commercial Core I to the Vail Village Club. The
recommendation for approval is based upon the staffs review of the minor exterior
alteration criteria outlined in Sections III through VI of this memorandum. Staff believes
the applicant has met each of the criteria.
Site Coverage Variance
The Community Development Department recommends - approval of the applicants
request for a site coverage variance subject to the following findings:
1. That the granting of the site coverage variance allowing for an increase in site
coverage by 1.1 % does not result in a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
the limitation on other properties in the Commercial Core I Zone District.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to the adjacent properties or
uses in the vicinity of the Vail Village Club.
3. That the strict and literal interpretation or enforcement of the 80% site coverage
limitation would result in a practical difficulty inconsistent with the objectives of
the Commercial Core I Zone District development standards and the goals and
objectives of the Master Plan documents of the Town of Vail.
f:\everyone\peclmemos \wc.824
REMOVE OVERP4NG
4-ND 3R--1G<Z-T&
REMOVE WINDOW —
"ND P;:LCCA7—= ON
NEW ELEVATION
SHORTEN, AN
SUPPORT
ROCK F-,4C
OF COLU`,N, I LEAVING
STRUCTURAL STEEL
NIT,4CT
=Xl5TfNr-- PLANTER
RIE",OVE STORE FRONT
DOOR ,-»ND WINDOW
E3,-t.C—< EXIST'
L;!
e =
E l k,
-
FR-=^-,OV4 51:
eE Is IL
FAGS
i7) 61,
42
I f
M j
\G GUTTERS { ( I
uTS b; r r7
��., ���•" { ii/ ' � ;li I � I � ( SID
V
CLAD U J[NDetU THE aIL VII LAGS CI B ; y A2
C= EX(ST = \ ) STGN�I�lCs S � .
TOP 0
El-
5TCRE =RCN-
GL455
fR
4 7 I ON F l oS
—,
3 t
1AA to
I
- - L� - - I- - - - - -- ! -_7 r te/ )
/
= I s•1 � -1-._� i « F^'..'c Cc : �r _ _ _E '_ C _ �Q.. _R'Y l',`:c �__.
_ � G 9 _ `�'p.,� - �.., 8 .. � c. � ;• cam.
. �I � I / ^\ iT'1 2c GEPr:.CL2 IJ�1 - • —
�-/ s,
cl
- - -- --
1�
ev— e-
�e*l Ll A
ev*� ,
Updated 8/14 4pm
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Monday, August 24, 1998
FINAL AGENDA
Project Orientation / LUNCH - Community Development Depa rtment
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
Greg Moffet
John Schofield
Galen Aasland
Diane Golden
Ann Bishop
Brian Doyon
Tom Weber
Site Visits:
1. RAD Five — 4469 Timber Falls Court
2. Vail Village Club — 298 Hanson Ranch Road
3. Vail Cascade Hotel — 1300 Westhaven Drive
Driver: Dominic
12:00 p.m.
STAFF PRESENT
Dominic Mauriello
George Ruther
Jeff Hunt
Judy Rodriguez
12:45 p.m.
6-
NOTE: If the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
p.m.
Public Hearing - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p.m.
1. A final review of a conditional use permit for a proposed addition to the Vail Interfaith
Chapel, located at 19 Vail Road/ Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village 1 st.
Applicant: Vail Interfaith Chapel, represented by Gwathmey /Pratt Architects
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 6 -0 -1 (Brian Doyon
recused)
APPROVED WITH 5 CONDITIONS:
1. The approval is subject to Town Council approval of encroachments on the Town
-owned stream tract .
2. The applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement with the Town of Vail
for all new and existing encroachments on Town -owned property.
3. No grading shall occur in the flood plain and all grading issues shall be worked out
with staff prior to DRB approval.
6
1 TOWN OF
Updated 8/14 4pm
4. That there be a provision to provide access to a streamwalk.
5. That parking be added if the basement is finished.
2. A request for an amendment to a previously approved development plan for the Timber
Falls Development, located at 4469 Timber Falls Court/unplatted.
Applicant: RAD Five L.L.C., represented by Greg Amsden
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Brian Doyon VOTE: 6 -1 (Greg Moffet
opposed)
DENIED
3. A request for a major amendment to SDD #4, to allow for a fractional fee club and a
change to the approved Development Plan, located at 1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven
Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A.
Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: Brian Doyon VOTE: 6 -1 (John Schofield
opposed)
APPROVED WITH 14 CONDITIONS:
That the applicant appear before the Town of Vail Design Review Board for a
conceptual review of the proposed major amendment prior to appearing before
the Vail Town Council for final consideration of the request. Any and all issues
identified by the Design Review Board at the time of the conceptual review shall
be addressed prior to appearing before the Town Council.
2. That the applicant submit a detailed contractor =s cost estimate identifying the
costs necessary to relocate the existing overhead utility line along the applicant =s
north property line underground, and that the applicant establish a financial bond
with the Town of Vail in the sum of 125% of the said relocating costs to insure the
undergrounding of the utility line.
3. That the applicant regrade and revegetate the knoll located at the northwest
corner of the development site at the time of the final grading of the Westhaven
Club & Lodge. Due to the exposure and aspect of the hillside, the knoll shall be
regrading to slopes not exceeding 3:1. The regrading shall be reviewed and
approved by the Town Engineer.
4. That the applicant provide Type III Employee Housing Unit deed - restrictions ,
which comply with the Town of Vail Employee Housing Requirements (Title 12,
Chapter 13, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code) for each of the 21 employee
housing units, and that said deed - restricted housing be made available for
occupancy, and that the deed restrictions be recorded at the Office of the Eagle
County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy for the Westhaven Club & Lodge.
5. That the applicant submit detailed civil engineering drawings of the required off -
site improvements (street lights, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, grading,
etc.) to the Town of Vail Public Works Department for review and approval prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
2
�A bw Updated 8/14 4pm
6. That the applicant record a twenty foot (20') wide pedestrian /bike easement for
that portion of pedestrian /bike path traversing the applicant =s property and as
identified on the Topographic Map prepared by Intermountain Engineering Ltd.,
dated 12/22/94, and that said easement be recorded at the Office of the Eagle
County Clerk & Recorder, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The exact
location and language of the easement shall be reviewed and approved by the
Town Attorney and Town Engineer prior to recordation.
7. That the applicant provide written documentation from the Public Service
Company granting approval of the construction of the Westhaven Club & Lodge in
the location identified on the site plan relative to the high pressure gas line.
Written approval shall be granted prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. That the applicant record an access easement along the east property line for that
portion of the driveway and access and trash enclosure which encroaches upon
the adjoining property and that said easement be recorded at the Office of the
Eagle County Clerk Recorder. The exact location and language of the easement
shall be reviewed and approved by the Town Attorney and Town Engineer prior to
recordation.
9. That the applicant explore alternatives to the proposed parking plan and provide
all of the required parking spaces (58) on -site as requested by the Vail Town
Council.
10. That the final landscape plan and architectural elevations be reviewed and
approved by the Town of Vail Design Review Board.
11. That the approval of this major amendment to Special Development District #4
shall become lapsed and void one year from the date of a second reading of an
ordinance amending the district, and that should the approval lapse, the applicant
shall be required to remove the Aruins@ and restore and revegetate the site by
no later than October 31, 1999. A bond providing financial security to ensure that
said removal occurs shall be required following second reading of an amending
ordinance. It shall be the applicant =s responsibility to provide a cost estimate of
the removal work. The bond shall be a minimum of 125% of the removal costs.
12. That the applicant revise and submit an amended site plan, landscape plan, and
grading plan indicating improvements to the existing boulder retaining wall along
the east side of the access driveway. Each of the plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Town staff and the Design Review Board.
13. That the surface parking lot be heated.
14. That the applicant pay -in -lieu for 10 parking spaces.
4. A request for a CC1 minor exterior alteration and site coverage variance to the Vail
Village Club, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road /Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st.
Applicant: Remonov, Inc., represented by Gies Architects
Planner: George Ruther
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE: 7 -0
Updated 8114 4pm
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the existing roof -top mechanical equipment be screened to staff's
satisfaction.
5. A request for a worksession to discuss a major amendment to SDD #4, to allow for the
use of the tennis facility for special events and conference facilities, located at 1300
Westhaven Drd Cascade Village Area A.
Applicant: Vail Cascade Hotel and Club, represented by Chris Hanen
Planner: George Ruther
WORKSESSION — NO VOTE
6. Information Update
7. Approval of August 10, 1998 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Ll
Community Development Plan Routing Form
Routed To:
Greg Hall, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works
Mike McGee, Fire
Gary Goodell, Building
Return To:
Christie Barton
Date Routed:
7/16/98
Return By:
7/27/98
Project Name:
Vail Village Club
Project Address:
333 Bridge Street
Project Legal:
Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village l st
Project Description:
Front entry addition. These plans show location of the fire alarm system.
If you have major comments, please let George know since I'm going to be on
vacation July 20 - 24th. Thanks!
Approved Denied (cite detailed reasons) Approved with conditions
� � Z 135
/k
� � Z 135
. 1.
Form AO /CHI Oder No. V261623 policy No. CTEU261623
SCHEDULE B
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
June 27, 1996, IN BOOK 698 AT PAGE 434.
12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED July 09,
1996 IN BOOK 699 AT PAGE 454.
13. ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE THE INSURED SHALL SUSTAIN DUE TO ORDER RE: MOTION TO
STAY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL AND FOR APPROVAL OF THE SUPERSEDEAS BOND,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 96 CV 120, DIVISION J, DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE,
STATE OF COLORADO, RECORDED JUNE 30, 1997 IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 807.
14. A DEED OF TRUST DATED May 03, 1996 FROM RIVA RIDGE PARTNERS LLC AND
MARGRETTA B. PARKS TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
FIRSTBANK OF AVON TO SECURE THE SUM OF $4,256,539.51, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS
PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED May 22, 1996, IN BOOK 695 AT PAGE
195.
DISBURSER'S NOTICE IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED May
22, 1996, IN BOOK 695 AT PAGE 196.
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED
June 27, 1996, IN BOOK 698 AT PAGE 434.
EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST
WAS RECORDED July 17, 1997, IN BOOK 732 AT PAGE 276.
EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST
WAS RECORDED December 26, 1997, IN BOOK 747 AT PAGE 388 RECEPTION
NO. 643331.
15. A DEED OF TRUST DATED May 02, 1997 FROM RIVA RIDGE PARTNERS, LLC AND
MARGRETTA B. PARKS TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
FIRSTBANK OF AVON TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2,500,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS
PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED May 29, 1997, IN BOOK 727 AT PAGE
907.
16. FINANCING STATEMENT FROM RIVA RIDGE PARTNERS, LLC AND MARGRETTA B. PARKS,
WITH FIRSTBANK OF AVON, THE SECURED PARTY, RECORDED JUNE 2, 1997 IN BOOK
728 AT PAGE 150.
17. LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS, P.C. IN THE
AMOUNT OF $101,575.74 RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1998 RECEPTION NO. 644857.
18. LIEN AS EVIDENCED BY THE STATEMENT OF J.L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION, INC, A
COLORADO CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,932.97 RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1998
RECEPTION NO. 648107.
Page 3
a �
Form AO /CHI Order No. V261623 Policy No. CTEU261623
SCHEDULE B
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company
will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by
reason of:
General Exceptions:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the
public records.
2. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other
matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and
inspection of the premises.
3. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public
records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material
heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown
by the public records.
5. 1998 TAXES NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE AND ASSESSMENTS NOT YET CERTIFIED TO THE
TREASURERS OFFICE.
6. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
7. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED July 13, 1899,
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
8. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR
NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 10, 1962, IN
BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179.
9. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES.
10. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING.
11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF LEASE BETWEEN MARGRETTA B. PARKS AND
RIVA RIDGE PARTNERS LLC RECORDED February 13, 1996 IN BOOK 687 AT PAGE 953.
Page 2
Form AO /CHI
Order No. V261623
Policy ivo. CTEU261623
Amount $1,500,000.00
SCHEDULE A
Address
LOT C BK 2 VAIL VILLAGE
FLG 1
1. Policy Date:
2. Name of Insured:
May 13, 1998 at 5:00 P.M.
REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
3. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule
and which is covered by this policy is:
A Fee Simple -
4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the
date hereof is vested in:
REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
5. The land referred to in this policy is situated in EAGLE
County, Colorado, and is described as follows:
LOT C, BLOCK 2, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDING TO THE
RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached.
L•A N D T I T L E G U A R A N T E E C 0 M P A N Y
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER
July 14, 1998
Our Order No.: V261623 -2
OWNER:
REMONOV & COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION
ADDRESS: LOT C BK 2 VAIL VILLAGE FLG 1
-----------------------------------------------
FOR ANY FOLLOW -UP PLEASE REFER
TO OUR ORDER NUMBER : V261623 -2
----------------------------------------- -----
_REMONOV & CO. MARGRETTA PARKS
BOX 1888 303 E. 17TH STREET
EDWARDS, CO 81632 DENVER, CO 80202
Attn: RICK MUELLER Attn: C/O MICHAEL SMITH
FAX 303 861 -2400
Copies: 1 via US Postal Service
Copies: 1
CLOSER
Attn: JIM HOOD WEAR, TRAVERS & DAVIS
(W. VAIL RUNS)
Copies: 1 1000 S. FRONTAGE RD. #200
VAIL, CO 81657
Attn: JIM WEAR
970 476 -7646
Copies: 1
Form AO /CHI Omar No. V261623 t ,)licy No. CTEU261623
SCHEDULE B
AMENDED STATEMENT OF LIEN RECORDED MARCH 26, 1998 RECEPTION NO. 650689.
ITEM NO. 4 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS RESULTING
FROM WORK OR MATERIAL CONTRACTED FOR OR FURNISHED AT THE REQUEST OF
MARGRETTA B. PARKS.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS
ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE REQUEST OF REMONOV &
COMPANY, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION.
Page 4
LIES ARCHITECTS, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Bridge Street Condo Asociation
281 Bridge St.
Vail, CO 81657
Linda Malaby
610 West Lionshead Circle
Ste. 100
Vail, CO 81657
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
Town of Vail
% Finance Dept.
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
Vail Corp
PO Box 7
Vail, CO 81657
0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD • SUITE D2 -1 • P.O. BOX 807 • EDWARDS, CO 81632
970- 926 -9280 •970 -926- 9281 Fax
E -mail • GiesArch @compuserve.com
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12 -3 -6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on August 24, 1998, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A final review to discuss the remodeled entryway with additional GRFA and site coverage
variance, located at 333 Bridge Street /Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1 st.
Applicant: Vail Village Club
Planner: Christie Barton
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing Impaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published August 10, 1998 in the Daily Trail.
*VAIL TOWN O
l NW
H
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970 -479 -2138
FAX 970 - 479 -2452
July 9, 1998
Mr. Brandt Vanderbosh
Gies Architects
PO Box 807
Edwards, CO 81632
Re: The Vail Village Club
Dear Mr. Vanderbosh,
I am in receipt of your application for both Design Review Board (DRB) and Planning &
Environmental Commission (PEC) approval of the proposed entryway addition to the Vail Village
Club.
Although we have attempted to expedite your review process by placing you on an early (July 13,
1998) Planning and Environmental Commission agenda, we will be unable to do so until
additional application items are submitted. Please refer to the attached checklist which details the
submittal requirements.
Your request will remain on the August 5, 1998 Design Review Board agenda for conceptual
review but it can not go before the Planning & Environmental Commission until the additional
submittal requirements are received. If you would like to discuss this project in more detail,
please call me at (970) 479 -2454.
Sincerely,
Christie Barton
Town Planner
TM
~� RECYCLEDPAPER
EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS
IN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CC 1)
(VAIL VILLAGE) existing
Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) review is required for the alteration of n mo
which adds or removes any enclosed floor area, the alteration of an existing building exerior
roof lines, the addition of a new outdoor dining deck or the modification of an exisitng outdoor dining deck,
or for the replacement of an existing building located in the CCI District. Following PEC approval, the
project must be reviewed by the Design Review Board.
1. P RE-AP LICATION CONFERENCE
A pre - application conference with a planning staff member is strongly encouraged. No application
ibility to make an appointment
can be accepted unless it is complete. It is the applicant's respons
with the staff to determine additional submittal requirements.
II. S UBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
❑ FEE: $200.00 - Minor Exterior Alteration (Less than 100 sq. ft.)
$500.00 - Major Exterior Alteration (More than 100 sq. ft.)
The fee must be paid at the time of submittal.
❑ Stamped, addressed envelopes Wi a list of the names and mailing addresses of all property owners
adjacent to the subject property, including properties behind and across streets. The applicant is
responsible for correct names and mailing addresses. This information is available from the Eagle
County Assessor's office,
Fo�L (.4.1- �R?�'s of the follawina:
❑ A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the property
including the location of improvements, topography, and natural features.
❑ A vicinity plan showing the project location in relationship to the surrounding area.
d A site plan at a scale of 1" = 10' showing existing and proposed improvements to the site.
The date, north arrow, scale and name of the proposed development with its legal description
shall be shown on the site plan.
❑ A landscape plan, at a scale of I " = 10% showing existing and proposed landscaping.
Existing and proposed building elevations and sections, at a scale not smaller than one -
eighth inch equals one foot, to determine the general scale and appearance of the proposed
development.
p� Existing and proposed floor plans at a scale of one- fourth inch equals one foot and a square
footage analysis of all existing and proposed uses in sufficient detail to determine floor area,
gross residential floor area, interior circulation, and locations of uses within buildings.
A roof height plan at a minimum scale of one- eighth inch equals one foot.
( Sun /shade analysis, unless the Administrator determines that the proposed addition has no
impact on the existing sun /shade pattern.
Page 1 of 3
A preliminary title report, including schedules A and B. to verify ownership and casements.
Condominium Association approval (if applicable).
Architectural or massing model scale to be determined by the Administrator.
A description of the precise nature of the proposal. The description must address:
Conformance with the purposes of the CCI District as specified in Section 18.24.010:
"The commercial core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the
unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges
and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The
commercial core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and
other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The
district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urban design guide plan and
design considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to
ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of
buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure
continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the
village."
2
1.
Service and Delivery
J.
Roofs
K.
Facades
L.
Decks and Patios
M.
Balconies
N.
Accent Elements
0.
Landscape Elements
Many of the above items should be addressed by graphic means, such as sketches, models
(including neighboring buildings), photos, ctc.
3
4.
The proposal substantially complies with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
regarding:
A.
Pedestrianization
B.
Vehicle Penetration
C.
Streetscape Framework
D.
Street Enclosure
E.
Street Edge
F,
Building Height
G.
Views
H.
Sun Shade Analysis
Compatibility with the character of the neighborhood.
Compliance with the Vail Village Master Plan, Streetscapc Master Plan and other relevant
documents of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
The Administrator may determine that additional material is necessary for the review of the
application.
III. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS CAN BE ACCEPTED. ALL OF
THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ORDER FOR THIS
APPLICATION TO BE DEEMED COMPLETE.
Page 2 of 3
IV. TIME REOUIREMENITS nr modifications in CCI involving more than 100
A. Applications for �naior� cxt�n alt erations --- -- iewed semi- annually. They need to be submitted on or
� square feet of floor area are only rev
before the 4th Monday of February or September. A complete application form and all
accompanying material (as described above) must be accepted by the Community
Development Department by the appropriate submittal date.
B. Applications for Iii eriur - 1` rations or modi fication of an existing building,
involving no more than 100 square feet may be submitted a t the required time cation form
for Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) review. A complete app
and all accompanying material (as described above) must be accepted by the Community
Development Department by the appropriate submittal date, which is a minimum of four (4)
weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearing. Incomplete applications (as determined
by the planning staff) can not be accepted.
V. ?A DDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES local, State or Federal agency other than
A. If this application requires a separate review by any
the Town of Vail, the applican �� fmc b y
limited to Colorado Department Highway Acces h
Access
review, may include, but are
Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess of
50% of the application fee. If, at the applicant's request, any matter is postponed for
hearing, causing the matter to be re- published, then, the entire fee for such re- publication
shall be paid by the applicant.
C. Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have design, land use
or other issues which may have a significant impact on the community may require review
by consultants in addition to Town staf£Comm Shou
una de te rm inati o n cmtDcpartmnthmayohire th�c
that an outside consultant is needed, the n' Dlopen e a the
consultant. The Department shall estimate the amount of money neces
consultant and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by the app at the time of
filing an application. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by
the applicant shall be paid to the Town by o t} e plict w upon review of notification by the
Town. Any excess funds will be returned appli
P 9RP 3 of 3
0
DIES ARCHITECTS, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
AM Building
Vail, Colorado
The following is the response required in conjunction with our application for the minor exterior
alterations in the commercial core of the Vail Village.
Commercial Core I (CCI) District
R� ((� (Z C ,f kly �15
The attached drawings clearly demonstrate the proposal's conformance with the purposes of the
CCI.
Pedestrian Environment
The alteration of the entrance to the street by adding a new entry vestibule and display case with
the integration of the existing landscape planter will increase visibility and connection to the street
and in return enhance the pedestrian environment.
Light Air and Open Spaces
The proposal will not effectively reduce the volume of space along the two pedestrian streets or
the square, and the addition of the Entry vestibule and display case will articulate the space and
create focal points at the pedestrian level.
Urban Design Guide Plan
Sub -Area Concepts
#9 Transparency increased and pedestrian scale
#11 Limited building expansion -- facade
Transparency increased to strengthen pedestrian activity
#15 Entry oriented to intersection
#18 Increased ground floor transparency
Pedestrianization
The quality of the pedestrian way is increased through the addition of a more central architectural
focal point.
Vehicle Penetration
N/A
0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD • SUITE 132 -1 • P.O. BOX 807 • EDWARDS, CO 81632
970 - 926 - 9280.970 -926- 9281 Fax
E -mail • GiesArch @compuserve.com
0 0
DIES ARCHITECTS, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Streetscape Framework
Landscaping has been reduced minimally to introduce a display case that replaced a void on the
facade, which enhances the framework, and articulation is added to the building to create
additional visual interest and activity.
Street Enclosure
The general characteristics of the "outdoor room" are unchanged. Entry vestibule and display case
has been added to create a pedestrian focus and divert attention from upper building heights.
Street Edge
The shape of the building now has additional articulation to create greater visual interest.
The new entry vestibule and display case will create welcome protection from rain and snow when
"window shopping" or simply pausing while walking through the Village.
Views
The addition will not adversely affect the long views down Hanson Ranch Road and Bridge Street.
From a distance, the eye will be directed down the street, and while closer, the Entry Vestibule and
articulated windows create focal points.
Sun/Shade
Due to the existing height and orientation, as well as the northern exposure of the building, the
addition will not extend existing shadow patterns.
Facades
Material/Color
The design maintains the existing color and texture of the existing building.
Windows and Doors
Forest green windows and storefront is to be used to match existing manufacturer and style.
Accent Elements
A wood truss with brackets; hanging signage, plant hanging brackets and accent lighting are all
utilized to create visual interest and texture.
0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD • SUITE D2 -1 • P.O. BOX 807 • EDWARDS, CO 81632
970 - 926 - 9280.970 -926- 9281 Fax
E -mail • GiesArch @compuserve.com
0 •
DIES ARCHITECTS, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Streetscape Master Plan
In addition to the issues raised in the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Village Master Plan, the
Streetscape Master Plan identifies the following issues to be addressed:
Existing pedestrian character to be maintained and enhanced.
e_-vC.'_6
Enhance an already exiting walking experience.
Vail Village Master Plan
Introduction - Upgrading buildings
Encourage continued upgrading and enhancement of existing commercial facilities to maintain
unique character of the Village.
Goal # 3
The walking experience is enhanced by the orientation of the entry to Siebert Circle, the addition
of the entry vestibule and display case, and the greater transparency and articulation of the
windows and doors.
Goal # 4
All current green space & open space shall be maintained. The creation of the new entry vestibule
will assist in drawing the public from Siebert Circle towards the east, introducing them to the open
space along mill Creek as well as the area along the south of the property.
0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD - SUITE D24 - P.O. BOX 807 - EDWARDS, CO 81632
970 - 926 - 9280.970 -926- 9281 Fax
E -mail - GiesArch @compuserve.com
` --�
�
REPT131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO '
12/19/97 08:28 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR:12/19/97
Activity:
Address:
Location:
Parcel:
Description:
Applicant:
Owner:
Contractor:
AREA:
.B#96-0033 12/19/97 Type: COMBUILD Status: ISSUED Constr: NCOM
298 HANSON RANCH RD
SERRONO'S,
2101-082-42-001
DEMO/REBUILD
J.L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION
VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
J.L. VIELE CONSTRUCTION
-----------------------------------
Inspection Request Information.....
Occ: A3 Use: II 1-HR
Phone: 970-476-3082
Phone:
Phone: 970-476-3082
Rwquestor: TONY Phone: 401-0203
Req Time: 01:00 Comments: ~~ rm-0203
Items req Inspected... Action Comments --- Time Exp
005369
_
-------------------------------------------�~��~� ----------
Inspection History~.... - r --
Item: 00503 PW-Final driveway grade
08/25/97 Inspector: LP Action: APPR APPROVED
Item: 00010 BLDG-Footings/Steel U
09/13/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
PA
PARTIAL APPROVAL
10/03/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
NO
NOTIFIED
Notes: received
eng
special
inspection
report for mat placemnet
at
grid 1-1
to 4-4 and 1 to 3
Inspector:
CF
05/19/97
Inspector:
DS
Action:
PA
S.E. RETAINING AND STAIR
Item: 00020 BLDG-Foundation/Steel
10/28/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
DN
09/27/96,
Inspector:
CF
Action:
PA
doesn't include west wal
motes: remove ice and snow prior to pour
concrete must be protected from the weather
10/02/96 Inspector: CF Action: PA BEAM POCKET SUIr 3/S3.1
10/05/96 Inspector: CD Action: APCR STAIR#1 STAIR#2
` Notes: INSTALL 2 36 BARS IN STAIR #1 NORTH CORNER
` COMPLETE BOND BEAM 2 #5 BAR IN STAIR # 2
INSTALL VERTS AND BOND BEAM IS ELEVATOR SHAFT
$80.00 HAS BEEN PAID FOR SPECIAL SATURDAY INSPECTION
CHECK # 1581
10/14/96
Inspector:
DS
Action:
PA
10/15/96
Inspector:
CD
Action:
DN
10/18/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
APPR
10/24/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
PA
10/25/96
Inspector:
EG
Action:
APPR
10/28/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
DN
11/14/96
Inspector:
CF
Action:
APPR
Notes: WINTER PROTECTION
REQUIRED
STAIR WELLS 2ND FLOOR
CONTRACTOR CANCELLED
FOR GROUTING ONLY
ELAVATOR SHAFT-MASONARY
APPROVED
NOT READY
2ND FLOOR SLAB
12/02/96 Inspector: CF Action: PA forth floor slab
Notes: almost done-winter protection required
12/05/96 Inspector: CF Action: PA 1ST LVL PERIMETER APRO
Notes: WINTER PROTECTION REQUIRED
12/12/96 Inspector: CF Action: PA top off layer
06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA SITE WALL SOUTHEAST
Item: 00520 PLAN-ILC Site Plan
mo/cm/a-I r...._�__' rn "-�'--' ^." ,.,
REPT131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 15
12/19/97 08:28 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR:12/19/97 AREA: CF
================================================================================
Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing
03/25/97 Inspector: CF Action: NO NOTIFIED
Notes: received special fireproofing inspectors report deficienc
were noted and must be corrected and followed with anothe
report
04/15/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Notes: 1. SHAFTS 2 HR CONST. 2. ALL FLOOR/CEILING PENETRATION
SEALED, 3.LETTER FROM STRUCTUAL ENGINEER APPROVING FRAMIN
04/16/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA EAST HALF OF BASEMENT
Notes: FIREPROOFING ENG NEEDS TO WRITE LETTER STATING ALTERNATIV
METHODS AND MATERIALS WERE USED FOR COLUMNS IN EXTERIOR W
AND IS EQUIVALENT TO UL LISTING
Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulation
03/18/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA BASEMENT ONLY
04/24/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA 1st floor lounge
04/30/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA 3RD FLOOR
Notes: 3RD FLOOR ROOF AND 4TH FLOOR WALL MUST BE A 4HR WALL
05/12/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
Item: 00060 BLDG-Sheetrock Nail
03/18/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA EXTERIOR DRYWALL ONLY
04/30/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA BASEMENT
05/05/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 2ND FLOOR ONLY
05/19/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA 3&4 STORY STAIR SHAFTS
Item: 00080 * * Not On File * *
06/16/9'7 Inspector: D8 Action: PA WALK THROUGH
Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc.
09/26/96 Inspector: CF Action: NO NOTIFIED
Notes: received eng letter ob
r
I t! N
equire an stamped/signed
1 96 Inspector: CD
!A�D���#n��)TO �R��V�WA
1`1/06/96 Inspector: CF �� 8 E�~ N SLAB
11/21/96 Inspector: CF R 3rd level slab
Notes: tie rebar to proper h��ghtl syr��n
winter protection required
04/21/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA check floor penetrations
Notes: penetrations at dumbwaiter must be reinspected
08/09/97 Inspector: CD Action: NO 1ST LEVEL KITCHEN
. Notes: HEAD HEIGHT IN 1ST LEVEL FOOD PREP HAND SINK MUST BE A MI
OF 7'
BE AWARE THAT ELEC. FRYER PROPOSED IS REDID TO BE LOCATED
UNDER A TYPE I HOOD
Item: 00090 BLDG-Final
Item: 00530 BLDG-Temp. C/O
08/29/97 Inspector: CD Action: DN 1ST NAD SECOND LEVEL
Notes: PER PLANNING MIKE MOLLICA A TCO CAN NOT BE ISSUED BECAUSE
PARKING PAY IN LIEU FEES HAVE NOT BEEN COLLECTED
10/22/97 Inspector: CD Action: DN 3RD AND 4TH LEVELS
Notes: ADDRESS #S REQUIRED
PARKING PAY IN LIEU MUST BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO TCO |
|
11/25/97 Inspector: CD Action: APPR EXCEPT BASEMENT LEVEL
Notes: PARKING PAY IN LEIU HAS BEEN RESOVLED
Item: 00531 FIRE-TEMP. C/O |
. |
Item: 00532 PW-TEMP /O 1
08/25/97 Insp���or: LP Action: APP*APPROVED �
.. ~~_- - ~=^` ��kd" ,`'" .
REPT131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 16
12/19/97 08:28 REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR :12/19/97 AREA: CF
Item: 00538 FIRE—FINAL C/O
Item: 00539 PW—FINAL C/O
Item: 00540 BLDG —Final C/O
_r
0
REPT131
12/19/97 08:28= TS FORTOWm OF VAIL" F
COLORADO
A ctivity- -- g b-0 = ^ ~
I N SPECTION W ORM
-~"�u
Address ^ P96-0091 SHEETS OR : 12 /19/9� PAGE .
Location: 298 HAN�ON RANCH TYpe: B �- ================= AREA: CF
parcel : 298 HANGON'RAr* RD �'-L/n�� Statu FINAL
Descriptio : 2101-0�2-42_0w�� RD Constr: NCOM =
Appli n: PLUMBING FOR mz
Owner- LUNS�ORD BROTNEW COMMERCIAL VAIL VIL U
Contra-''~' � «HIL VILLAG� ^Eno MECH. CONST LAGE CLUB se:
ctor: LUNSpORD BROTCLU8 ^ Pho»e; 30324257g0
Ins�ecti-------------_�� BROTHERS CLUB
CONST Phone:
Requeson�: Request Infor---_----------____^_ Phone: 30324257g0
t
TONY
'''��zon ---____
IteR�qrTime: �91 :00 Comment ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -----------' -----------__
002-~ �q«ested to b I s: BASEMENT W Phone: 4�1 ----
Action comments
Tim E
Insp --4.
ion Hi
Item: 002S tory.
�C L - 2 tz ��
09 / 11 /96 I nspect nd
Item OOP-20 PLMB--Ro Or: CF Action APP
Notes. nsp CF Action PA
04/2,�, 97 Ac tion" APP balance
m ' 0022 FIR-_ ec tOr - : DS bar sinks Plmb exopt 3rd
02 / 25 /97 1 RI KLER ROUGH Action AP PR 2'ND FLOOR 15
Item 0 0230 nspect CF
03/14/9 Inspector,: "On APPR 74psi
Not CF air bsmnt/ flr
Action: APPR street Pressure
Item.* everYthing but 3rd floor- kit
00240 PLMB_Gas
03/14/97 PiPing and 4th
Item: Inspe Action Ap
Item 00at-jo PL_MB_p000tOr: DS Act* PR
-' 00260 PL-MB-Misl/HOt Tub ' APPR Sop" "aOft & boil
Item: 0029 . 0. FINAL GA
06 / 25 /97 I nspector: CD
Notes: COMPLETE GROUT Action: DN
GRAB BARS REQUI IN ALL AREAS IST,2ND,3RD LEVEL
RED IN ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS
ADA SIGNS 'RED IN ACCES
REQUIRED ON BA-FHROOMSSIBLE c
WOO DOORS MUST BE SEALED SHOWERS
I NSTALL TRAPS ON POP SANITARY REASONS
CAP DRAIN LINE IN 2 GARBAGE DISPOSALS
ADD STRAINERS AND B AR 1ST FL OOR AREA IN MAIN RITHCEN
COMPLETE COVERS T
PIPING CONDENSATE WASTE WASTE D
2ND LEVEL WOMEN'S RESTROOM FO R COOLERS 1SCHARGE
08/26/9 WALL STAELS MUST
Notes.. 7 i nspector: CD BE MIN OF 30,, R
DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MIN 15"F
DOORS MSU - WITH STOOL LOCATED IN MIDD
Action: PA 'ND 2ND LEVEL ONLY
BE SEALED By TCO I ST A
B GRAB BARS M UST BE- INSTALLED
ASED ON OC IN MEN'S BA
COPANT LOAD ON 2ND THRC)OM
REPT131 - L, COLORADO .
TOWN OF VAI
12 / 19 / 97 = 08 :28 = REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR:12/19/97 AREA: PAGE CF
18
OWNERS OF VAIL VILLAGE CLUB.MUST SUBMIT A LETTER ACKNOW
THIS AND WILL NOT HOLD THE | NLIABLE �OR ANY OCCURANC
BECAUSE OF THAT FACT =o
10/22/97 Inspector: CD Action: APPR 3RD AND 4TH LEVELS �
"
�
�
- -^
r
ice' ��
REP°T 131 �
11/25/97 13 :09 REQUESTS TOWIy OF VAIL, COLORADO i�C�
r` -F FOROR
INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FO R
_ SHE AREA: 14
` t Y : B96 -0033 11 / 2 5/9 7 - __ - - -- ---- _ . 1 1 /`r 5/97 AREA : CF
Act i i ess: 298 HANSON RANCH TYPe:` C OMBUILD�Statu s :_y
Locati SSUED G�`_______�___�
ion: ERRONO S nstr: NCOM��
Parcel: 2101- 082_42_001
D`- 'sc�r'i pt i on : DEMO /REBUILD
Occ: A3 Use: II 1 -HR
Applicant: J,L•. VIELE CONSTRUCTION
Owner: VAIL VILLAGE CLUB Phone: �,` 08`
Contractor ; 970 476 -
J, L, VIELE CONSTRUCTION Phone:
____ _ Phone; 970- 476 - 082
Inspect Request Information. -------.---'-_."-
Requestor: .... ---------------------------------- q Time: 01;00 Comments; Phone;
- - -__
Items request 01:00
to be Inspected...
00330 LLnG - Temp. C/O Action Comme is
T'
----------- _
InspectionMHistory....,_� _____ -- _�_� _ __..._-
_�__
Item : 00303 PW -Final dri v ewa
08/25/9 7 I Y gr ~ade pector: LP
Item: 00010 BLDG- - Footings /Steel Action: AP°P°R
APPROVED
09/13/96 Inspector: CF
10/03/96 Inspector: CF Action; PA PARTIAL AP'P'ROVAL.
Notes; received en Action: NO NOTIFIED
at grid 1 -1 to inspectio
0x/19 n report for mat plar_emnet,
%97 Inspector: 4�4 and 1 to 3
Item: 000:0 BLDG - Foundation /Steel Action: PEA
S. E. RETAINING AND ST'' R
Notes: Inspector: CF
Notes: remove ic Action: PA doesnit
and snow prior to include west wal•
concrete must be protected from�� the
10/0:/96 Inspector: CF weather
Action : PA 10/03/96 Inspector; BEAM POCKET r
Notes: INSTALL 36 CD APCR C SEE /,,�,. 1
BEAM STAI R STAT R#k2
COMPLETE BARS STAIR #1 NORTH CORNER
VERTS `= #5 PAR IN STAIR # 2 X80.00 HAS' BEE 'NNF°APDNFCIRESPjECTAELSATURD SHAFT
CHECK # 1381 AY INSPECTION
10/14/96 Inspector: DS
10/13/96 Inspector: Action: PA STAIR WELLS
10/18/96 Inspector; CF D Action: ON AND FLOOR
AP PR CONTRACTOR CANCELLED
Action:
10/24/96 Inspector: CF APPR FOR GROUTING ONLY
10/25/96 Inspector: FG Action: Pp EI_AVATOR SHAFT -
1 0/28/96 Ins Action: AP°P°R APPROVED MASONARY
Inspector : CF Action: ON
Inspector: CF NOT READY
Notes: WINTER PROTECTION REG Action : APPR 2ND FLOOR SLAB
1 2/02/96 Inspe U IRED
Notes: i
almost Action: PA
ost done- winter protection forth floor
1 `-/ 03 /96 Inspector: CF slab
Notes: WINTER PROTECTION REQUIRED
PA 1ST L.VL PERIMETER APRO
12/12/96 Inspector; CF
06/02/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA top off layer
Item; 00520 PLAN -ILC Site Plan Action: Pp
SITE WALL SOUTHEAST
02/20/97 Inane,- ,x...._ _ ......
REPT131
11/25/97 15:09 REOUESTS FORTOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO
IN8PECTION WORK SHEETS FOR: PAGE pAGE 15
---~^ 00030 B LDG - Framing -----=================== AREA: CF
03/25/97 Inspector: CF ========================
' Notes: received special fireproofing
NO NOTIFIED =
were»oted and must be report deficienc
'
04/15/97 -r~sr"ector: DS ---' c orrected and followed with anothe /
Notes: I- S 2 HR CONST Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
04/16/gc`EIALED' 3^LETTER FRO^ 2~ ��LLFLOOR/CEILING PENETRATION
_ Notes: ' CF �' ~'R�/U�LENGINEER APPROVING pRAMIN
' ENG NEEDS — `` ^"o: �' A EAST HALF OF BASEMENT
It AN
'ODS E °�wuyMATERIALS TO WRITE LETTER STATING ALTERNATIV
em: @0050 BLD�_-- OUI ALENT TO UL LIS7IN~ COLUMNS IN EXTERIOR W
Insul
03/18/97 " ��
04/24/g7 Inspector: DS Action: PA
04/30/97 ^ Inspector, Action: pp BASEMENT ONLY
Notes: 3R CF Action; st floor loun
05/12/97 u FLOOR ROOF AND 4TH FLOOR PA 3RD FLOOR ge
Item: 00060 BLD � n spector: DG ActiuM WALL MUST BE A 4HR WALL
^ ` 03/18/97 u-Sheetrock Nail on: APPR 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
04/30/97 Inspect Action:
DS
^os Action: PA x
05 / 0 5/97
Inspector: CF Action: PA EXTERIOR DRYWALL ONLY
Inspector: DS
It 05 /19/97 Action: AppR BASEMENT
�m: 0 0080 * * Vv� -�^^^u': u� Action: PA �m� FLOOR ONLY
It 06/16/97 I=^seeun File 3&4 STORY STAIR SHAFTS
* *
em: BLDG-Mlse. DS Action: PA WALK THROUGH
09/26/96 Inspector:
require an i c
10 ' 1 1/96 I -,-~'�^y"e
PPR
Actl
Notes: ADD VERTS TO NORTH W LL Q
11/06/96 Inspector: CF
"21/96 Inspector: CF ktion: APPO-IST" kT
Nates: IN E SLAB
inter Protecti Not � Inspector: CF Action: � --
`�08/es: Inspector:
at dumb PA check fl
m�/9� Inspector� CD waiter must �e reinspected oor penetrations
Notes: HEAD HEIGHT IN 1ST LEyAction: mO" 1SKITCH
�F 7' �� FOOD PREP HAN ��,=� EN
BE D A WARE T THAT ELEC. FRYER PROPOSED W SINK MUST E A MI
Item: 00090
BLDG BLDG-Temp. YPE I HOOD IS REQ'D TO BE LOCATED
Item: 00530 B
08y2g/g, C/O
Notes:
08/29/97 Ins p e ctor: CD A ction: DN 1ST NAD SECOND
10/22/gp RKING PAY IN LIEU FEES HA CAN NOT BE ISSUEDBLEVEL
Notes: / D 1 nspector: CD Action: E NOT BEEN COLLECTED E�CAUSE
ADDRESS #G~REQUIRED on: DN 3RD AND 4TH LEVELS
Item: 00531 F , An^ImG PAY IN LIEU MUST
Item: 00532 pIRf-TEMP. C/O BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO TCO
W C/O
08/25/97 Ins
^
"Item: 005 pec LP Action
Item: 6905`7 �'~"-'c/ C�O ���
Item: 005� PLAN-F1111 C/O
�d FIRE-FIN-- [/n
IV. 1 mq
. . -
~~. �
REPT131
11/2s/97 15:09 REQUES S FORTOWN OF VAIL,�-COLORADO
INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR PAGE
It em: 00540 BLDG C==========================:11/25/97 AREA: CF
`
'
�
�
`
^
04 / 1679-7— f - nspectOF! LAUREI`T�Ction: APPN HPPHUVED N
REPT131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE
11/25/97 15:09 REQUEltSTS FOR INSPECTION WORK SHEETS FOR:11/25/97 AREA: CF
Item: 00030 BLDG-Framing
03/25/97 Inspector: CF Action: NO NOTIFIED
Notes: received special fireproofin inspectors report deficienc
- were noted and must be corrected and followed with anothe
report
04/15/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL
Notes: 1. SHAFTS 2 HR CONST. 2. ALL FLOOR/CEILING PENETRATION
SEALED, 3-LETTER FROM STRUCTUAL ENGINEER APPROVING FRAMIN
04/16/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA EAST HALF OF BASEMENT
Notes: FIREPROOFING ENG NEEDS TO WRITE LETTER STATING ALTERNATIV
METHODS AND MATERIALS WERE USED FOR COLUMNS IN EXTERIOR W
AND IS EQUIVALENT TO UL LISTING
Item: 00050 BLDG-Insulatio
0 3/18/97 Inspector DS Action: VIA BASEMENT ONLY
041"24/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA Ist floor lounge
0 4/30/97 Inspector-. CF Action: PA 3RD FLOOR
Notes: 3RD FLOOR ROOF AND 4TH FLOOR WAI.J.- MUST BE A 4HR WALL
05/12/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
Item: 00060 BLDG� Nail
0 3/18/97 Inspector: DS Action. PA EXTERIOR DRYWALL ONLY
0 4/30/97 Inspector: CF Action: PA BASEMENT
0 5/05/97 Inspector: DS Action: APPR 2ND FLOOR ONLY
05/19/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA �&Iq- STORY STAIR SHAFTS
Item: 00080 * * Not On File * *
0 6/16/97 Inspector: DS Action: PA WALK THROUGH
Item: 00070 BLDG-Misc.
09/26/96 Inspector: CF Action: NO NOTIFIED
Notes: received eng letter observing reinforcement in footer
require an stamped/signed letter from eng.
10 Inspector: CD Action: APPIR MAS.
Notes: ann "cp-rq WALL
ILI
11 Inspector:
NORTH WALL
CF Action:
APPR
11/21/96 Inspector:
CF Action:
APPR
Notes. tie rebar to
proper heightas
shown
winter protection required
0 4/21/97 Inspector:
CF Action:
PA
Notes. penetrations
at dumbwaiter Must
be
08/09/97 Inspector:
CD Action:
NO
Notes: HEAD HEIGHT IN
IST LEVEL FOOD
PREP
ur- 7
BE AWARE THAT ELEC.
UNDER A TYPE I HOOD
Item: 00090 BLDG-Final
Item: 0033 BLDG-Temp. C/o
171r,
IST LEVEL CONCRETE GLAB
3rd level slab
check floor penetration
reinspected
IST LEVEL KITCHEN
HAND SINK MUST BE A MI
FRYER PROPOSED IS REPID TO BE LOCATED
/a Inspector: CD Action: DN 1ST
Notes: PIER PLANNING MIKE MOLLICA A TCO CAN NOT
PARKING PAY IN LIEU FEES HAVE NOT BEEN
10/22/97 Inspector: CD Action: DN 3RD
Notec nnm
RF-C ffb REQUIRED
Item: 00, PARKING PAY IN LIEU
,j31 FIRE-TEMP. C/o
Item: 00532 PW C/o
08/25/97 Inspector: LP
Item: 00533 PLAN-TEftn C/o
It f-� R : 00537 PLAN-FINW C/o
Item: 00538 FTRP-PTKhn1 (1/n
NAD SECOND LEVEL
BE ISSUED BECAUSE
COLLECTED
AND 4TH LEVELS
MUST BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO TCO
Action: APPR APPROVED
Y
. �
�
'
REPT131
TS FOR
OF VAIL, COLORADO
10/14/97 07:17 R
� =opE
Ac���[ION WORK SHEETS FOR:10/14/9 PAGE 16
Add.--/^ c��-ml30 10/14/g7== 7 AREA
Lo
Address: 298 HANGON RANCH Type: B-ELEC St =================== : EG
/ cation: 298 HA RD atus: ISSUED ==========
' l �ON RANCH RD Constr: ACO
i Des��riptPar ce : 2101-�982-42_001
--M
Aoplic^on: ELECTRICAL FOR NEW COMMERCIAL yAIL VILLAGE Use:
Owner: VAIL-''^ `� ELECTRIC CLUB
COT) AIL
WHITE VILLAGE CLUB Phone: 30394g1403
--------_________ RIVER ELECTRIC Phone:
I nspection Requ es --------------- --__-___ Phone: 3039491403
R «estor: CHAD^ /nror mation,,,,, -------___________________
Item .«eq Time: 08:00 CO ~ --------------
Action COmmeLnts
Time Exp
Insp
04/16/97 Inspector: EG APPR
j Inspector: EG Action: APP 2nd fl
05/05/97 Inspector: EG
03/09/9 Act i or): APP 3rd fl
Actio APPR north st a i r - wall
Inspector, EG Action: APPR
' It em: 001 0 ELEC-Con Action: AppR 4th fl oor SOL(th S
03/05/97 -it
Ins p e ctor ., EG Action:
Notes; Action. Walls cei
pr . ion on I APPROVED
"Or' to E.G. Of switch Gear,. 2 ,3 1 4 and 5 elec.
08 / 2 2/97 Inspe
APPROVED 11 PRE-CHECK AL
RE INSPECTION ONLY.
OUIREMENTS; EXIT LIGHTING,
FUTURE HEAT TAPE J-BOX5 SLEEVE SJ CORDS,
ADD LIGHTS IN HALL. GF I By WET SINKS,13LANK OFF
Item: 00190 ELEC-Final
08 / 28 /97 Inspe
Note Or: LPV Actio APPR APPROVED
FIRST LEVEL NEEDS BLANK COVER IN CLOSET Ar,
PANEL SCHEDULE
BOX OUT FOR
ODD J_BOX J FLEX CABLE
UNDER SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
SECOND F LOOR NEED TO INSPECT ROOMS
THl' RD FLOOR NO UNI
jjjTOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO PAGE 1 4
11/17/9b 08:07 REQUESTS INSPECTION WORK SHEETS AREA: CF
Activity: M96-0074 11/17498 Type: B-MECH Status: ISSUED Constr: NCON
Address: 296 HANSON RANCH RD
Location: 298 HANSON RANCH RD.
Parcel; 2101-082-42-001 Occ. Use.
Description: MECH FOR NEW COMMERCIAL VAIL VILLAGE CLUB
Applicant: LUNSFORD BROTHERS MECH. CONST.
Owner; VAIL VILLAGE CLUB Phone-
Contractor: LUNSFORD BROTHERS MECH. CONST. Phone: 3Q3Q425790
Inspection Request Information ..... %HQ0
Requestors Crai 326 61W
Req time: 01:00 Comments: ird & 4th levels Phone: 243-6790
be Inspected Action Comments Tife Exy
Items requested to
00390 MECH-Final
InsPectfon History...
Item: 00200 MECH-Rough
02/28/97 Inspector: DS
�03/04/97 Inspector: CD
Notes: ADJUST EXHAUST DUCT
SHAFT ENCLOSURE AND
24/08/97 Inspector: CF
Item: 00240 PLMB-5as Piping
Q/19/97.jqspector: CD
Action: DN
Action: APPR
AT TOP FLOOR TO
OBTAIN 2 HR RAT
Action: APPR
-. .
APPR
- - _-_�
04/22/97
motes:
20 PSl,60 PSI,- PSI
Item:
00310
METH-Heating ~ '
06/23/97
08/14/97 Inspector: CF
Item:
00320
MECH-0haust Hoods
DS
03/04/97
Inspector: CD'
Item:
00330
`
MECH Air ` x
Item:
0Q340
MFrw-w�=,
- - _-_�
04/22/97
.-~^.
Inspector:
DS
696/19/97
Inspector:
CD
06/23/97
Inspector:
DS
07/01/97
Inspector:
DS
07/02/91
Inspector:
DS
07/15/97
Inspector:
DS
07/16/97
Inspector:
DS
07/17/97
Inspector:
DS
07/18/97
Inspector:
LPV
07/22/97
Inspector:
DS
Item: 00390 MECH-Final
Item: 00538 C/O
Action: APPR
Action: APPR
- Action:
APPR
Action:
APPR
Action:
PA
Action:
DN
Action:
^A
Actibn:
DN
Action:
DN
Action:
DN
Action:
APPR
-_-__-_��
_ . ��_-_________.
NOT READY TONY NOT THERE
KIT.DUCT + B-VENT
ALLOW COMPLETION OF
ING
APPROVED
UNDERGROUND
snomelt and heat
K�TCHEN DUCT APPROVED
�
SNOW M FLOOR 600 �
SmowmE|2ND�FL 30PGI
SNOWMELT SOUK STAIR8
NOT READY
SNOWMELT FRONT' -
60P�I
�c
SNOW,. =LT NOT READY
�
NOT READY
NOT REAe�
APPROVED
PARTIAL EAST SIDE
_ `
08/29/97 Inspector: JG -- Action: APPR SYSTEM ON FLOORS
Notes: 3RD AND 4TH ILL ' '�~~
UhfDtR CONSTRUCTION. SPR SYSTEM I
UN-LINE AND MONITORED INTHESE AREAS.
-
TOWN OF VAIL
Office of the Town Attorney
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970 - 479 - 2107 /Fax 970 - 479 -2157
December 11, 1997
Mr. Bob Hernreich
Mr. Glenn Heelan
Mr. Charlie Davison
Post Office Box 5770
Avon, Co 81620
Gentlemen:
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Enclosed is a fully executed original copy of the Settlement Agreement resolving all issues
concerning the parking pay -in -lieu.
As you know we have received the original letter of credit. I will be reviewing that document to
make certain that it fulfills all of our needs. If I have any questions I will first contact you prior to
talking to the Deposit Guaranty National Bank.
Also enclosed are two checks payable to the Town of Vail in the amounts of $57,341.63 and
$49,468.86, and the original of a Promissory Note dated November 19, 1997 executed by Glenn
Heelan and Charlie Davison.
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact either myself or Bob McLaurin
directly.
Very truly yours,
TOWNAF VAIL
�`�;
R. Thomas Moorhea
Town Attorney
RTM/aw
Enclosure
xc: Robert W. McLaurin, Town Manager
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk (w /originals)
Mike Mollica, Assistant Community Development Director
to ~) RECYCLED PAPER
TM