HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 7 LODGE AT LIONSHEAD LEGAL.pdf'w"""i!;9tnLg_"li:J 9..e qt!6:!Jia$;-1f!i
Date:
Subject:
09121120OO 3:18:03 PM
RE: Lodge at Lionshead Phase lll
Thanks Warren
tom
---Original Message----
From: Warren Campbell [mailto:WCampbell@vailgov.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21 , 2006 10:52 AM
To: lbieker@4240arch.com ; tom @braunassociates.com
Subject: Lodge at Lionshead Phase lll
Lou and Tom.
Here are some thoughts I have had since our meeting and after showing
it to several people.
1 ) As discussed the View Corridor will be an importanl facet of this
application. The design will be reviewed for how view corridor 3 is
created/protected by your project.
2) Eagle River Water and Sanitary District wanted to point out that
there is a sewer and other utilities along the rear of this property and
the oeek which will need to be addressed. They wanied to raise the
concern in relation to the tree relocation in this area.
3) Any improvements to the driveway access would be encouraged,
however, a varaince would be required as a part of the application to
maintain the -16% slope.
4) The planning department, as mentioned at the meeting, will have
concerns over how the pool in the southeast corner will relate to the
public spaces around this area.
5) When drawing elevations show adjacent structures and how your
building will relate to those structures in terms of height and spacing
between buildings.
6) Staff is still reviewing the impact of the Gore Creek Corridor on
the site and buildings along the corridor, but initial review indicates
your assumptions of only the southernmost building being impact to be in
keeping with the spirit of the text.
I have given copies of your plans to the Fire and PW departmetns. lf I
get any comments I will fonvard lhem on to you.
Regards,
Warren Camobell
Page 1
t ' fq"[ Nr.c:rr.-, ', Lot61 Blk 11 Uq;l LansheilfrarS
. From: U 'Tom Braun" <tom@braunassociates.com>- To: "'Warren Campbell"' <WCampbell@vailgov.com>
I
|l
-
CnapreR. 8 AncsnpcruAl DnsrcN Grimrui.rss
Ski Yard and Open Space Frontages
This paragraph applies to the portion of any property not meeting the
criteria of the Primary Retail Pedestrian Frontages section above, and
fronting on the ski yard or the Gore Creek corridor. Due to the unique
and highly visible nature ofthese areas, building faces fronting thern
shall be limited to maximum initial eave heights of 48', at which point
those faces shall step back a minimum of l2'.
It is critical to note that the 48' maximum initial eave height does not
allow for an unarticulated, flat building face from grade to 48'. The
horizontal and vertical maximum unbroken building face
requirements, as well as all other guidelines contained in this chapter
and the Master Plan, shall apply.
Remaining B uilding Frontage
Building faces that do not meet the special site criteria of the sections
above may have a maximum initial eave height of 60', at which point
those faces must step back a minimum of 12'. To the extent possible,
all new and redeveloped buildings in Lionshead should avoid "tuming
their backs" on other buildings or important pedestrian corridors.
However, it must be acknowledged that very few buildings have prime
frontage on all sides and almost all buildings will have different
programmatic requirements and visual characteristics on their different
faces. Toward that end, a building's greatest vertical mass and "back
ofhouse" functions should occur on the frontage with the least volume
ofpedestrian traffic. In addition, components of a building with the
greatest vertical mass should be oriented north-south to minimize the
blockage of southem views and swrlight.
It is critical to note that the 60' maximum initial eave height does not
allow for an unarticulated, flat building face from grade to 60'. The
horizontal and vertical maximum unbroken building face
requirements, all other guidelines contained in this chapter and the
Master Plan, and DRB review and approval, shall still apply.
ll/al I S u rfoc e C riteri a
Notwithstanding the previous height and setback requirements, there
shall be no vertical wall face greater than 35' on a building without a
secondary horizontal step in the building face (the horizontal step may
be a cantilever or a setback). This requirement is intended to prevent
large, unbroken planes in the middles ofbuilding faces, to fuither
LtoNssne,D REDEvELopMENT MASTER PLAN Page 8-19
Department of Public Worl<s & Transportation
1309 Elkhorn Drive
Vail, CO 81657
970-479-2I58
Fax: 970-479-2166
www.vailgov-com
MEMO
To:
From:
Re:
Date:
Warren Campbell, Senior Planner
Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer
Lodge at Lionshead Phase II Conceptual Plan Review
to/o4t06
The Town of Vail Public Works Deparfrnent has received the Lodge at Lionshead Phase III conceptual'oTown
Staff Project Introduction" redevelopment plans. Based on the conceptual plans the following are cornments
that may effect the design of the project We reserve the riglrt to provide additional comment during theDRB
Process, civil engineering submittal process and the Building Permit review process.
1. The existing Town of Vail storm drainage does not exist within platted easement. Please re-align storm
drain or re-platt easernent. No permanent structures may be placed within easement and placement of
hees should be minimum and subject review. The storm sewer shall be upgraded to Re-enforced
Concrete Pipe for those sections that run beneath heated driveways or walks.
2. T\e existing drainage way crossing the property shall be included in the environmental report.
3. The re-aligrred path shall also be included in the environmental report and shall not impact existing
reparian area.
4. Show the 100 year floodplain, the path and all construcfion shall be outside ofthe 100 yr floodplain.
5. The port-cochere shall be completely within private property.
6. The proposed accesses shall meet Town Development standards. 2% slope across walk, 4% for the first
30' from edge of road, then a maximum of l2o/o (if heated).
7. Internal garage ramps shall be a maximum of l2%o and meet all parking garage standards.
8. Is one SU-30 loading and delivery bay adequate per code?
9. A haffic study drainage report, geotechnical report, environmental report will be required.
10. Implementation of a portion of the streetscape masterplan will be required to be implemented.
1 1. Shoring for excavation shall be required to be maintained on the property unless otherwise approved
from adjacent property owners.
ol *l NI !+l
fx
o-a
3i
l:(
=€)
u,
(E
-c o-tt
G o
U'
o€fE _P
lF\3 \azr t oi
cDl E#Q;JE
ol \tl
+l
f,
P.
Rt
qE
H,r
I
t4
Eg
E
9
z 3
=
E
2
!e9
qF
E--
-7
E9
a
c)()
o_
Q
o
rL
*
-7/
lt '/I ___--)
o
a
,.ox tot ,o<
)))ll ittt I IAi r.'
l,,,lii ii I iii'
lt lr o.t ro ct rf!i'UtF t{t 'd
-___j,ii ,_{l
gl
NI +l
2
x
I'
e!
E*E-
E t
t I
E
E
t 3i oi
3d
33
:l
:3
i,q
Dr C'FE
EE
P3 Rfi
.:.o |.---{l-
I Ol t--{lLl
o
Ll tl
l:
i!
tl ;i,
'll
,
d t
I
:
I
to
a
c\*
c
:-
c.)
U)
o-
a
c.)o
qt o
o
I'o
o
o
6 {,
o :
6
llJ
I
o o
o?o 3l
:F d=
-F E'F o.=(rE
ol
E o
o
';i o-YO
xo
EE ;s ;q db
ID
ER 3--
E=
ts9
ir8
3E
EE
(L O-
!o
gai
;_o q'E
fie o{D
EF
xo
5E
ol tl c{l *t
t
E:
I ll
I
^t 6Z {t 6E
7
e
8
=3
f,
:
ol td
Bl'
-7 ti
c
\b."rl
ti\ !
EE \-
!i
I
z
U z
b6
<l
dE
d
I tl *
|s
-lt
j;3
H
fr
i3
F
\l I
\f;rl I tl
d ttf t(
't I ri tl:,li
I ll .h
tt \t
f€
-t<
\.(
7
\e t\
t
FEF
(
r
If
it ,
I ll
5
P&ep ooEq' u6urs|lq.t ot t
s t
r/
-4 t\
J r\
lli
}--'\--{.t i1\
,\ry9.
t
J
I Er
!l s'i 5e EEI ratr
i
8
R
e
6
!
ol $l NI tl
\i\
iti
IE:
{E:l. e"!t t:ir Elt
Ee fd
\
s.
\l
!\:l
rl
ij :l
tly_l ti ,
/{,ti}|L ,r-
/< I t)1 I
tl lr'\ll r. I
I "1-f(
1\ r t
i tl ;l
.rl rj
r r &rp oE!eF.!*' I I \+l
E &
t
f
I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
5.3
5;
Eb
!o
iE
!ra 3o .i
PE
<.i
i$
6;
i;^
-vc o crf =(o oo t l'-duf s qEr I
- v.:
En* e
iD x- !t
t t;SH i
*; dfl5q I
Fg$;5*B
,F ; t:: g
oE pb <z
$i\r$\
(--
6
(.,)
o)
.E
(L
L--- _
I
I
I
I \
I r--J
I
I
I
I
I
!:u
^ ! es
Fi ii+
5ii:,{
ratii
Selii
t:sr;i'! 9!lI>
P
EN ttl,
=I i
T E
@E
It
!
o
D
olr
6
j
P
.E
f
v)
-'; i
?. i;;
E g:
":t Tl F;:ign _a'9
ic""!:"rut!-.
Peses
i'! si :-r
q9:
=;_3zH
!5e
3
l
t\\
\1,.
-a .>
F3 5 oao
It 'i io El
'-l.g R .E:8'c
6 xE !EcB !:Et d dSoo d
3 [e I Exe I a"-L &
f I u)
<)
o c!
(.i
ha vc xE xo
t*-e E:!
EEJ dd(o
Ed <(n
("
L
I
L ____
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I t-__-
I
I
I
4.eobrp,.upnF4*, $l \tl
e
n
AE
iE
H8
E
d q
E
=I
-i.!36
in F6
F!
i;
id -
.qY::: i di>
L;I9
YE;
o(J
<__ ol-
f)0
f,
cn !
m
-c -
a
di !+
cr()
d-q 5*;
Ess E ::A >,i
E
=
!
c
__o
o o
!
c
o
l.
!
!'
9
n*&.t
I
ct
gl
$l
-l
3
o o tr
c N
o'
o
a
crl
l.
!2 J
\_
3 3
6E c-
ir!FE
-b l!
3E ffs $
.Ei F
.9! Y :: !d!\
YE;
tn tn (r()
()
'.r)o+
_@. (o.
Eg
x !!E co qr
F €:
ti zn
o o
&
j
c,
ol
J
I
I
^I
EE
t( d!
9
a
f;
c€
@a
g9
--
dt
i
p
r/)
!
m
_c
l
U)
.^!.eoor.€"-.sc..4,p&,., $l \$l
:
n.i
AE
6
FE
:.9 trj
.Ft;
9: *
P6 3
:;{
iiE e
;E;
u1 u1 (J(J
o!o ON @@
--: di:
': li tnn
6-9 r, :#o-
= --E X:
ah z@
o l)
]F il rF-;l t||! +t-tl ll t, I
l)
; .:.-
t,'.-,.'----
F
&
Eg
Fi.r
a
t
5
o o
o -
-l
o f
-c
crl o
m
-c.
l
a
',rJ.c oib.fp qe.nFq!p.6c' g
I NI rlfI
./ r\,
2.'-'.\
/ .-l \
::
6-t
f!
9E .70;
.i6 "
o! I
!- n
d!\
il19 !4-:YE;
tn u)oo
Or-o-@-
-0o
': Ljj a\l
d\ _9 b;;o-C -E = =-E X:a26
g
e
I
a
I
L.
.d,* o.r",F ..u!'FPF tt
3- I \tl
E
E
!
j
.i r-! ':.{:: ! '\1:;]:
li
jr- -l'- r
4,.:
n
e6
EE
6g FE
s!
9:,Fo "i
,i6 "
.E9 S
=n:di\
{:9
YE;
oo
o$o- ol
I
o f
-c
o !(D
_c
=a
,' ti la cj()
cn 9t :, =;o-I eE
= -e E :i A >'i
o
e
;L
-o<
-,-l..,:T
En.
9
EE
I
E
a
tr
E
tD
CN
!
co
E
o z
9
s,,D-NFu'.fq*.o,e, $l \ lit I
.:
6.E s-
FE
t.;
io ,*o;
.E: *
?F E
dI\
YE;
tn
o
;
(J
d,*!o*E<
('(,
(
!
-J
I
E
E
EE
t f
I
Ee Ji
@9
3i
rl
_l
.i
J
o
tr
-c.
u)
cn _a
6
E
z
t : :,_.r. ;.
/-. -. :-,r-1,,1,-; -.)-.i 7..,i.- '
f
g-
at
FE
f!
3;,*r;
ii *
.EY:
d !>
!4-;YE;
l,a
cn x9
o-
o t
E 2
.Es
og
!i
-*rt
f t(
I
^!r
EP 5,r
2
6
*,
c
o-
E o E
-l
tl
-
s
::
E
':;
i.!
3r
f i B 9: *
rF !:- b dT:
()
o
d
@
o
S.!bco c
5;at
o It
c
.9
GJ
15 )
gl
NI *l
I K
3
9T
EE l( rt
t
E Ee E{
I
1R
-l
tl
E
E o
or
i-
E c .;
c)a
-c
l o
U1
-c
o z
.:: EE
6E;:;
e 6.!g !:
_; ;;i:E i lEtqa
E i,li i!'"-' .'iJEEt I ! "c:l:E I
. !5D="t =e I ! F; i!;: i
rf \-
\t
>
)z>\q
(_)
q
''/-.o
C\
ti
qu
.1
ol +l c{l tl
I
I
^P
F5
6
t3
E t
F
I
=
t
5€
@g
IJ It
)R
c o
o-
clr
.=
a
0)
a,rr.9 oe*p |@uqplra
2.: 2 :E €F< i
E
6602.Z-t
EJP E
o9
E
E
E; E 3e-
;;€ l;n !ir :ir ,:a'
E.; b 6i "
E iH !;{-Es ,r:i *;j ss I
i-s i EE:::i Eg;
sEii sr!
z
p
-- !+ q ! !: 1; -l r.- -ll r.2e222291 99ll g
:{*s33!l pall e
:. * :. : 3 3' r'l -6.
qll S-| .3ll (,
ttl !: * !'^ != ( .Ll L r Lll L ss229el g-sgll g
o o o f| n Jll r ^ ^ll o Esiq=ql ssRll E ri Fr .: d d Fjl ii :_ o'.ll ;.| .lj:ll
-!2 a q i P b-tl:t:o.rr,.*L*
-c<!!le:-Y6+'5n:(5
E 26
3<
-F
6P
.3
.E-
3z
3.P
.n
=c
tz
63
!
I
b
5
=t
I
.E c :q
q
F
I
q
t q
e
U 2t
i_{i3.
:;;&3d
L- tL!-+Lul,LL Lar!rL t!t!lL |!t!lll!t auturtnarntnu:t t t^6al ltt \naat anovro lJ ZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZ ZZZ ZZZZ
o lr)o'n|r,f)o')||) ooJloo() ooo rO|(|OO on Fore-@oFt! 'oF.Nooc| oNN Ft (c .\t c{
- o-oNo* { r')F. -iFl.l d N.-i.iri-,; + ;,rtd^;!dd R Ri SBRE tolrl-Gt
; ,=! ,=!FIPFer;! ',*gF! s gg
5 f :s:l*i!EE =!*i!E igsi e:i
p ; !5;€3si; :583H9 :i! :is <tsz(4|l
Etse
jxd
ocL
Eaz
o.:
L-9z
!@
z z z z
2z oB
z z z z
!!ii Yz
ts9
z z z a z z
zz z 6 z 6 z z
iz
nE
z z -z z
zz
:n 'o
z 2
oz zo =
R
6 z
zz z z
.' i-9 a,x^o:
6 o a(r
"ir-
*l
I
EI qit
F$
_l
tl
c!
6
z.
-J (L
tr
a
o
trJ o o (L o d (L
i!r
rt
b,9 2^3E gh
(ni6X
o-:iqlri^_
P* .s!*N !+ i :<6 _aii? &u & :fR BEs'BB HsR vrl- L@ 06 TJ CO o,.i o,d : E c,i F,.t i .grn .Ec.r; -- :-=
m @aa
q
E
e
-q ': Fr
,: cr -9
6:@ li
ql !rl NI $t
t9
@g
_gF
-a
c,
o
o
crl
.E _p
o o )
a-c ..
-i
9
s
AJ
ol tl NI $l
I 6
^?
Hf
EE
,
i
=
2
E
I
@!td Ii It
-7 ti !d
T o o-
E o (L
c
E
o
CJ
{.)
lf)
z_
=
o14 XZ
AA
f,'1 :<+E
6?zz
+z
o
a
F 5
tta 9= d
Ed, E fiF a
=
E* 2 E :: =i A6 R
E s8 g
ot4 :;
dH
9,2
z6
gl
crl I +l
I
s!
E*€,r
E3
-a
9t
--
I
=I
E
fE
@g
!3
n o
=-c.
f
6
E o
(.)
o
U'!
(n
zz
2a 6!!
E
E
I
I
oa
EE
H.r
t
EE
-:a
E ,
E
=I d
eg
Bd
J'
c)cll
o
arl c
=
o_
E
3 o
r$!.p o6r.q. t|ld.nPq.rro'n g
I /+l
-st 93 5o eg
tA6
6
;
;
:
ID
I
(J
C,llt" ' 625bb ORICIIVAI
Ri't'''
0411 1L ll
CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
Receipt funds to,:
Name: t- tonbH6
Legal Description: Lot
Subdivision:
Address:
R
d
C-e r
I
N
t\t C=€r
Cz,
asa TI.
Developer:
Project Number:
lmprovement Completion Dale: Tv,l lS 2-odl
ER IMPROVEMENT EM NT
,r- -^W5 O L br,t
THIS AGREE and entered into this 3A Oay of Df,.s^2003,
Town of by and among u (the "Developer"), and the
Vail(the "Town").
WH Develo condition of approval of the Temporary Certificate ot
i-r\r\;C-c, r'-,,.A\
in this Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and agreements,
the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
'1 . The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to furnish all equipment and
materials necessary to perform and complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement. The
Developer agrees to complete all improvements referred to in this Agreement on or before the _
day of S:nE lf , 200{ The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike
manner, all improvements refened to in this Agreement, in accordance with all approved plans
and specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of
Vail, and to do all work incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and to
the satisfaction of, the Town Planner, the Town Engineer, the Town Building
Official, or other official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or
service districts, as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed
complete until approved and accepted as completed by the Community
Development Department and Public Works Department of the Town of Vail.
Flcdev\Bjll\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash dtaft_121202.doc Page 1 of 5
2. To secure and guarantee performance of the obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide collateral as follows:
A cash deposit account with the Town of Vail, as escrow ageni, in the amount of
$ l25O (125% of the total costs of the attached estimated
bid(s)) as collateral for the completion of all improvements referred to in this
Agreement, in the event there is a default under this Agreement by the Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateipl originally set forth above
for another form of security or collateral acceptable to the Town to.guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein in this Agreement an! the performance of
the terms of this Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative becurity or collateral
shall be at the Town's sole discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable on',
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occuning to the work specified'jh.this
Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor ariy]
officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injure{ by reason of .the nature.
of said work, but all of said liabilities shall be and are helbby assumedby the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Tci"in, arld any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees rnay become subject to, insofar a9 any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in reSpect thereof) arise out of or are based upon
any performance by the Developer herqunder; and the Developer shall reimburse the Town. for
any and all legal or other expenses r€bbonably incurred. by the Town in connection ivith
investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liab-ility or action. This indemnity
provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer my.have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply forand the Town may
authorize a partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category of
improvement after the subject improvement is constructed in compliance with all plans and
specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no condition shall the
dollar amount of the collateral that is being held by the Town be reduced below the dollar amount
necessary to complete all uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement.
6. lf the Town determines, at its sole discretion, that any of the improvements
referred to in this Agreement are not constructed in compliance with the approved plans and
specifications filed in the office of the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail or
not accepted by the Town as complete on or before the date set forth in Paragraph 1 of this
Agreement, the Town may, but shall not be required to, draw upon the security referred to in this
Agreement and complete the uncompleted improvements refened to in this Agreement. Pursuant
to Section 12-11-8, Vail Town Code, the Temporary Cerlificate of Occupancy referred to in this
Agreement may be revoked until all improvements referred to herein are completed by the
Developer or the Town in accordance with this Aqreement.
F:\cdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash drafl_12.1202.doc Page 2 of 5
lf the costs of completing the uncompleted improvements referred to in this Agreement
exceed the dollar amount of the deposit, the excess, together with interest at twelve percent
(12%) per annum, shall be a lien against the property and may be collected by civil suit or may be
certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be collected in the same manner as delinquent ad
valorem taxes levied against such property. lf the Developer fails or refuses to cornplete the
improvements refened to in this Agreement, such failure or refusal shall be considered a vielation
of Title 12 (Zoning Regulations), of the Vail Town Code, and the Developer shall be subject to
penalties pursuant to Section 12-3-10 (Violations: Penalties) and Chapter 14 (General Penalty),
of the Vail Town Code.
7. The Developer shall warranty the work and materials of all improvements refened
to in this Agreement located on Town property or within a Town right-of-way, pursuant to Chapter
8-3, of the Vail Town Code, for a period of two years after the Town's acceptance of said
improvements.
B. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from time
to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto.
Ficdev\Bill\Projects\OlA\OlA Cash dtaft_121202.doc Page 3 of 5
t
,i
Dated the day and year first above written.
STATE OF COLOMDO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
----^-\ ---->t4?:&'.s/ rzYt"".--+r-,rqsAe='t;--
- .+:-'5*a>-iTf 4-\;=-.-.'.!-r( !,'t'\ ff>:G<-,.,4.14---\
Developer
My commissiofl €xpireS: "lt
t vt'""'-''---'' ' - " "
SS.
The foregoing Developer lmprovement Agreement was acknowledged before me this
S"rtiayit Prcr,qiae ,zobiby Sy Au^;,*+L
Witness my hand and official seal.
t/
My commission exOnes 1D/aq,/OG
STATEOFCOLORADO I
)SS.COUNryOFEAGLE )
The foregoing Qeveloper lmprovement Agreement was acknowledged before me this i5 o'ay "TSs=^..-.*=-, zor]ltov 9.-ou-(-n- ur.iLo,-
Witness my hand and official seal.
r\r'naamiocanavnirao llYc0illts$illilflnE${18iB:"
Flcdev\Bill\Projects\DlA\DlA Cash d?ll_121202.doc Page 4 of 5
ATT
F:\cde\^Bill\Pro.iects\DlA\DlA Cash drafi_121202.doc Page 5 ot 5
llov 26 03 O3:5?p
Hollyrvood Seruiccs lac.
VdYdlry RoetiryFo*
POBor49Ol PO Bor 2473
Vdl, CO 81658 Basdt @81621
97G7{84??5 97V(ffJ-33Y2
Ho I I yruood Serv i ccs I nc .9?O?480??O P,I
Estimate
ICC Cupay
AtrcndoD: Rkh
Ilox 3{l
Aton CO 816Z)
TERMS PROJECT Change Oder #
Upoo necciE Ladge et Lionrhcad
OESCR|PNON Outndaty I COST I AMOUNT I Extra TOTAL
Sod l,ayed
SprinHcr Rcpair & Additioos r*H i H:$750.00
?50.00
WebSlte
HollvwoodServiccslnc. com
Th? todge at lion5Flead
November 2l,2OO3
TO: Town of Vail Plannine Comrnission
ATTN: George Ruther
FROM: Lionshead Itr Condominium Association
To Whom It May Concern:
Please note that as of lI/21/03 there is approximately $1000.00 of landscaping to be
completed at Lodge at Lionshead Phase Itr in the spring of 2004. The scope of this work
is contracted and to be completed by KC Company.
The approximate breakdown for the work above is:
$750 - Sod Replacement
$250 - Sprinkler Repair
sincererY' t^-Sgw€
Lionshead Itr Condominium Association
Prolessionally Managed by Peak Resort Services, Inc.
380 East Lionshead Circle Vail, Colorado 81657 (97o\ 476-2700
Ilepartment of Gommunlty Doyelopment
75 S, Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Name:
I -d | --,l€\Receipt No.
Project:Date L l/ o, 0(
Please make checks payable to the TOYYI{ OF VAL
d.t
001 0000
001 oooo :t.
iz
cl c::
e
3
z --l
r i-l 'a Li 'r -6 nj .:r i' -:r I l!n,s .-F.a]m
r, :-: .r fi ' ri
o O! 6 (-lcr (-'
Trl
:a1,ts-l
ri ,'
f'.,
=
Lrl
rr, F
:a:
'r,
r-
:: .:
_-Ir*
r a,' ai
=J
E
-J
001 0000
001 oooo
001 0000
001 0000:
001 0000:
001 0000 I
001 0000:
001 0000:
001 0000 I
.se:,e 001 0000:.
001 0000 :.
001 0000 :-
001 0000 3
001 0000 -?
001 0000 3,
001 0000 312 3000 Contractors License Fees
1 0000 312 1000
Assess.-Restauranl Fee to Co.Deot.Rev.
1 0000 319 3100
1100000314 111s
.001 0000 201 1000 Taxable @ 4.4% (State) . Tar
-001 0000 310 1200
-1 150000310 I200
chsck# S-Z+ / R€coinsdry: Le
rFl
.o OE
FI t5z
.o
F "z s9
FF
zo
d&r
.J
F
o
E
FI gl
F
o
FT
!4
F
4
F1
o o9.oo .r
oo
rt)HO
OQ F.
a&
o.l E
OFl F
J
t!
F'
AFr 2Z
EO F] E &4
FI
FI
FFr ZA Nb EO FT
p
62 dD ,o
FE
FI FT E2
oo AE
o
A]tr
|.]
F
tc
2 o
E!)
2A
=c o oar F, 40
o()
FI
f'l
FI
v
F
Fl a
;
<,
E>
!d=q.r c4 0
ao i Flo 3 tsc o
tbign Review Action Ftt
TOWN OF VAIL
catesoryNumber oate '1 t thl
"roi"o*^ "ta,,{'L.At,- o+ L,o,^,l^-.,f, p^..nr:_ n**r.'^,1r,.*/*.
Building Name:1t,a-€
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone: *T1^€ L r-,J, < - / 1,,,."r^ e.-.'1, PLra l. fT-
Architecvoontact, Address and Phone: k, t F, e lr|s , F,.l)c. or,e ,f ^r . Q. 0. Ao< 132 |
AJaq, {o il,lL.'' O 845- 4o,/4- FovX49- '} c-,,o ?
LegalDescription:Lot G elock 3 I Subdivision;r,'i1,,-.rio^.-l ,-'^ zoneDistrict llitlFfttpt'lf
Project Street Address:iYO Fo,rl l-i,nsk,--.t (,rt le
Motion by:
_.\
Board 1,8{att Action -,\,.,:=_--____
Vote:
Seconded by:
! Approval
! Disapproval
f,statt Rpprovat
Gonditions:
O Llt,,ie Sr,. \er ,.,, l. { Crr,'i ir"-l i-,.,.- ;.
Town Planner
ao
TILE COPT
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
April l, 1997
D e p arnne nt of Comrnun ity D eve lop tne nt
Mr. Ric Ficlds
Ficldscapc
P.O. Box l87l
Avon. CO 81657
Rc: Parking rcdcsign and landscapc plan for thc Lodgc at Lionshcad Phasc 3
Dcar Mr. Ficlds:
Thc Community Dcvclopmcnt Dcpartmcnt has approvcd your plans for rcrvorking/rcgrading thc
parking arca and thc landscapc plan for thc abovc rcfcrcncecl propcrty. Thc approval ofthcsc
plans is subjcct to thc condition that thc proposcd boilcr bc relocatcd to an arca outsidc ofthc
front sctback.
Thlnk you for your paticncc in thc proccss.
f f you havc any qucstions call mc at4'19-2148'
Sinccrcly,-A)
't I 0n L-1J l\',\a^ l-Kp
Dominic F. Mauricllo, AICP
Town Planncr
{g *"n"rrrruo
COPY FIL I
75 Soutlr Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8/479-2 I 39
FAX 970-479-2452
Departrnent of Conmunity Developnent
March 6, 1997
Mr. Ric Ficlds
Fieldscape
P.O, Box l87l
Avon, CO 81657
Rc: Parking rcdcsign forthc Lodgc at Lionshcad Phasc 3
Dcar Mr, Ficlds:
Staff has reviewed thc plans you submittcd for thc improvcmcnt of this parking lot and your
proposcd landscapc plan. Thc I'ublic Works Deparlmcnt has indicated thc following conccms
rvhich should bc addrcsscd on the plan:
I . The Town of vail has installcd landscaping, a fcnce, and irrigation along thc cast
portion olthis site, at thc dircction of thc Lodge at Lionshcad, Phasc lll. Your
iandscapc plan shows grading and othcr improvcmcnts in this arca. Plcasc rcvisc
thc plan to show that this arca will not bc changcd or disturbcd. Staffrccomrncnds
that you pull your proposcd rock rvall and othcr improvcmcnts back bchind thcsc
improvcmctrts. Plcasc rcvisc the plan accordingly and provide thc appropriate
notcs.
For your information, staff bclievcs that thc swale you are proposing would
function morc appropriatcly at a2'/o gtade. Plcase considcr this issuc. This not a
rcquircmcnt.
The proposed drivcway grade shown on thc plans is based on the ultimatc
rcconstruction of thc roadway. You nced to provide a phased plan that shows
what will happcn in thc intcrim. Thc proposcd plan will crcatc a grade problcm in
thc intcrim if constructcd as shown on thc plan. lt appears that it may be bcst to
phase thc construction at the 8,141 contour' Also, plcasc changc thc saw cut
elevation to 81 42.43 instcad of 8 I 42.3 l. Plcasc providc a plan which clcarly
addrcsscs the intcrim period.
Pagc I of2
2.
3.
{P *""'t"o '*"'
!:
.;..1 r,1 I ' I U .&.J t the plan shows drainage being providcd via pipc to the "existing drain." If this
drain theu connects to the larger line provided, then this can be approved. Ifthis is
a dry wel[, then you should not connect to this drain, but rather, connect to the
larger drain provided on-site. Please indioate the invert for each drain connection.
Thank you for you patience in the process.
If you have any questions call me ar479-2148.
. Mauriello, AICP
Page2 of2
5. A request lor an inlerior remodel, utilizing the 250 ordinance, located at 548 s' Fronlage -
RoadlWestwind Condominiums' Unit #305'
Applicant: Jim Beedie, represented by Mike Haselhorst
Planner: Lauren Waterton
STAFF APPROVED
6. A request for a setback variance to allow for a snowmelt boiler to encroach 5'5 feet into a
sideyard setback, ioiat"O at 2049 Sunburst DriveiLot 1, Vail Valley tfth filing'
Applicant: Landon and Mary Hilliard, represented by Larry Eskwith
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL JULY 8' 1996
7. A request for a conditional use permit, a density and !o1t sehack variance to allow for a
Type Il EHU
"oou"
tn"
"iisiin-g
git"gi, located at 227 Rockledge Road/Lot 13A' Block 7'
Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Steve Kirby
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL JULY 8' 1996
8. A request for a worksession to discuss a parking and retaining wall height variancq to ^^^
allow for tne consiruition of a new parkin! areait the Lodge at Lionshead, located at 380
iast Lionshead CircleiLot 6, Block 2, Vail Lionshead, 2nd Filing'
Applicant: Lodge at Lionshead, represented by Ric Fields
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL JULY 8, 1996
9. A request for a conditional use permit to construct a trailhead parking area, located at
Fled Sandstone Road/Parcel A' Lions Ridge 1st filing'
Applicant: 1Oth Mtn. Division/Town of Vail
Planner: Russ Forrest
*'THDRAWN
tiltttltttl
10. lnformation UPdate
1 1 . Approval of June 10, 1996 minutes
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notificalion- Please call 479-2114 voic€ or 479-2356
TDD for information.
Agenda last reviscd 1U96 9ala
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
MondaY, JulY 8' 1996
AGENDA
Proiectorientation/Lunch.CommunityDeve|opmentDepartment12:00pm
Site visits 1:00 Pm
1. Messenbaugh - 970 FairwaY Court
2. Vail ChaPel - 19 Vail Road
3. Lodge ai Lionshead - 380 East Lionshead Circle
Driver: Qeorge
Public Hearing - Town Council Chambers 2:00 p'm'
1. A request tor a Setback variance to allow for a snowmelt boiler to encroach 5'5 feet into a
siO"VirO setback,loiiteO at 2049 Sunburst Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley 4th Filing'
Applicant: Landon and Mary Hilliard, represented by Larry Eskwith
Planner: George Ruther
Z. A request for a worksession to discuss parking and relaining wall height variancesto allow for
the construction oi JnL* parking area ai the L6dge at Lionshead' Phase lll, located at 380
East Lionshead Circlellot 6, Bloak 2, Vail Lionshead, 2nd Filing'
Applicant: Lodge at Lionshead, represented by Ric Fields
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
3. A request for kont and side setback variances to allow for a residential addition to the -
vesdenbaugh r.riJ.ni.,located at 970 Fairway CourVLot 5, VailVillage 1Oth Filing'
Applicant: Robert and Hildegard Messenbaugh, represented by Mike Guida
Planner: George Ruther
4. A request lor worksession to discuss a conditional use permit for a proposed addition to the
Vail chapel, located at 1 9 Vail Fload/Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant:VailBeligiousFoundation,representedbyNedGwathmey Planner: Dominic Mauriello
5. A reQuest lor a conceptual discussion of Lionshead redevelopment'
Applicant: Vail Associates, represented by Dave Corbin
Planner: Susan ConnellY
IILE COPY
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
July 8, 1996
A request for a worksession to discuss proposed parking, setback, and retaining
wall height variances to allow for the construction of a new parking area at the
lJOgJir lionsneao, phase 3, tocated at 380 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 6, Block
2, Vail Lionshead, 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Lodge at Lionshead, represented by Ric Fields
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I, DESCRIPTION OFTHE REQUEST
The applicant is requesting several variances in order to reconstruct the existing surface parking
area dri this site. the rec|nstruction involves removing the existing carport which houses 3
paifi"g spaces and spreading the parking out.across the lrontage of this lot. Both the proposed
inO tn6 existing contiluratioricontiin six-parking spaces (see the proposed parking plan)' The
specific variances include the following:
1 . A variance lrom Section 18.58.020 (C) Fences, Hedges, Walls, and Screening to
allow a retaining wall in the front yard setback in excess of 3' in height. The
proposed wall is up to 5.5' in height.
2. A variance from section 18.20.140 Parking and Loading for the High Density
Multiple Family (HDMF) district lo allow 5 parking spaces. in the front yard s_qtback
(ZO'). No parfing is all6wed in the front setback area of this zone district. The
iroposed parking spac€s are up to 3'from the front property line'
3. A variance lrom Section 18.20.140 Parking and Loading for the HDMF district to
allow less than 75% of the total parking on-site to be completely screened or
enclosed. The site is currently nonconlorming with respect to parking. There are
currently 18 parking spaces tocateO on-site. The required parking for this site is
25 parking sbaces (z ier unit, except for Unit 12 which requires.2.5 spaces)'.
Th6reforel 1b parking'spaces (75%) are required to be enclosed or completely
screened. This requ-est provides for 12 enclosed spaces and 6 surface spaces
(33% of the parkin! provided). Currently there are 15 enclosed spaces (83%).
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: HDMF (29ol" ot lot) and MDMF (71ol" of lo0
Lot size: 0.9822 acres or 42,784'63 sq' ft'
Allowed/REuired Existino Proposed
GRFA: 18,076.51 sq' ft'' 20,M3 sq' ft''. N/A
Parking: 25 spacas 18 spaces 18 spaces
Enclosed parking: 19 spaces (75%) 15 spaces (83o/") 12 spaces (66yd
Landscaping: 30o/o ? ?
This figure was de rued trun intormation in the file regarding the 29h171T" zoning split. These figures wote
applied-to the density limitations of each district'
.-This tigure is an estimate of th€ units based on informaiion provided by Jetf Bailey, Manager' lt does not
include iny common areas thal mi;hl qualify as GRFA'
il. rssuEs FOR DISCUSSION
Parking Layout
rnJ ipFr[iirt has indicated that the reason for the reconfiguration of the existing parking is to
ioiu.l'Orainage proOrem in ine existing parking tot and tohake the parking_T9J9l-11.^1911 ._,^
The proposal iircieases the amount of paving and spreads the parking across the trontage oI Inls
lot.
Staff believes that the parking could be reconfigured in substantially the same configurelion to
"oir"Ct1ne""
problemd by im-proving the driveway grade-, possibly heating the drive, and
iOeqriieif addressing Oiainige on-this site. n6o, statt does not find a.hardship which justifies
me tjfacerient of a rei-aining wallgreater than 3' in height in the front seback'
Enclosed Parting
The proposal incr6ases the amount of parking which is not completely screened. The total
number'ot exis1ng enctoleO parking sfaces ii tS (eSZ) and the proposed number of enclosed
spaces is 12 (66/").
Staff believes that a decrease in the amount of screened parking, especially in the this area, is
unicc-eptanie. The Town is attempting to improve this pedestrian route, through public
.
imJro-"jr"nt", and this proposal ii worfing igainsl the objectives for this area by reducing
landscaping.
Straetscape r/€,stet Ptan
The Streeiscape Master Plan recommends methods to soften this area with the introduction ot
finOJcaping iri order to screen parking areas and make the area more inviting for pedestrians. A
paver sidewalk is proposed in the right-of-way along this frontage'
Staff believes the introduction and exposure of parking along this frontage is inconsistent with the
SiteeGiape Flan for this area. The variances would ilow parking spaces up to 3'from the right-
ol-way and the ProPosed sidewalk.
|:bveryone\pecVnemos\lodglion. S
l-andscaping
ft'li."O-dii"irires that 30% of this site be landscaped' The proposed plan reduces the amount
of landscaping Provided on-site.
Staff is unable to evaluate this requirement at this time as the apptlcant llq not provided a.site
ir". ii tni
".riie
iitJ. ir'id ieqrilrent wirr be addressed priortb the PEC's final review of the
proposal.
IV. CRITEBIA AND FINDINGS
The code criteria for review ol such a request are provided for your information' Since this is a
worksession, staff has not addressed the specific criteria'
A. Consideration of Factors;
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
structures in the vicinitY.
2.
3.
The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interprelation and.enforcement
ot i sf&irieO regulation is necessary to achieve cornpatibilitv "tqililgit1iy of
tt""tii.r,t aroni sites in the vicinity or to aftain the objectives ol this tifle without
grant ot sPecial Privilege.
The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population'
trinsfonation and tiatfic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety'
granting a variance:
1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a granl ol special privilege
.
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district-
2. That the granting ol the variance will not be detrimental to the public health' safety
or wetfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity'
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physicalhardship
inconsistent with the obiectives of this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the same site of the variance that doe not apply generally to
other Properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
proPerties in the same district.
B.
t :bveryone\p€cvnemos\odglion.708
V. STAFF RECOMIIIENDATION
Since this is a worksession to discuss the proposed variances at the Lodge at I ionsfiead'
phase 3, statt wiri noi Oe providing a tormdl staff recommendation at this time' Statf will,
;til;"t, provide a staff recommelndation at the 1me of final PEC review'
f :\e\reryon6\pec\m€moslodglion.708
<l
-l
--o
\
<l
I
-F.
l-
PSt:L-
o
00 o
FF$$i'rFn c^o
,p
i
t
gt
.. aD!a ,$EIF
I htF
F &IF
E5I$
x
F t
oi
$ii[[
h z
b
s !
iQu
iFF ri
$
R
u
P
b
E
_i
I d
I'
;l al
F.
6l i \',
Qi ()ol
f,
c\2r q li il (\'
u
i
\rI a:
CE
gB
**oo,ui)ii
t
t I
R
5
I
11
e
A t
E
I
i
otR rKi
ts9 xnr
9r
$t
l;i{t)
'ttffifl
3$
F$, $3 { zo !t-i g'*
{ 4rli - Uo9,? l*"..i$
o
iu
=a 2 o
-l t
{J (t o o J
ill
=F
1
d
a 2
d
a I
a
z,
a
z
=I t
:I
d
t
5 t
ar
t
/'h \t/
i
B;S""94-,,X!?"'SI I I
ladrcsplalJ
opBroror',t1uno3 a13es'r!'A
t'"r;t"dill,.,j d:peaqsuoll
un,o u,r,,unra
^reu
rurrraJd
I /,/ ,/
,r'' ,/
91
. "a..._
\( \
",\',\\\
Ii",ll\,
ti
\---.
,l i=!:
!ll
rI
t ' $!
i|'
it_
a
updated 4ll7l95
APPLICATION FOR A VARIA}{CE
GENERAL INFORMATION
This procodwc is rcquircd for any project rcquesing a variance. Thc application will not bc acceptcd until all tho
information is submitlcd.
BREIF DESCRJPTION OIT PROPOSAL
NAMEOFAPPLICANT(type orpnil) Qt6 Ft€L6
ADDRESS P.a. :t'/. lb?l PIIONE-,ffib:3-4b-
CITY, STATE,ZIP A./otl , Lo bilp"a
NAMEOFAPPLICANT'SREPRESENTATTVE Lop{# @, Llo}.tqr-l€Ap Ft \MEot^Irl@\ A€ld
ADDRBSS boo -eJ6i Llc,tlilgD Oe-<tE PITONE-41-?:-4@--
Clry. STATE. zIP uAtt . Lo bLb61
D. NAME OF OWNER(S) (typo or ,-r, J"v'. A>!4 ,\-io,--\
owNER(s) STGNATUR-E(At=cnT-
ADDRDSS 3 uoNs_____i1=_ 31D:
CITY, STATE, ZIP \i r=., r--\tvr51
E. LOCATIONOFPROPOSAL:3c4,o t . t-, o,--:\t-r-.-,c\ a<
LOT______________BLOCK__-rirLrNG
STREETADDRESS 3too f- r-, . ,"..11-1L,\ <-.(
CITY, STATE, ZIP
II.. FEE
L r/o-.-. (_.3 AtU:?
$250.00 PAID---CK#/z-1-bj-Bv dorle'tl€*p I I I zo*too a=+' t-i .
The foe 4gg.! be paid bcficre tho Community Dovclopmcnt Dcpartmcnt will accopt your proposal.
IIT. ADJACENT PROPERTY NOTIFICATION
Stamped addressed envelopes of the namcs of owners ofall propcrty adjacent to thc subjcct propefty
INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a list of thcir namcs and mailing addresses.
THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
rV. PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE
A pre-application conferonce with a planning staff mcmber is strongly rccommendcd to dctcrmine if any additional
information is nccdcd No application will bc acccptcd unlcss it is complcte (must includc all items requircd
by tho zoning administrator). It is thc applicant's rcsponsibility to mako an appointmcnt with thc staffto find
out about additional submittal rcquircrncnts.
V. SUBMITTALINFORMATION
PLEASE NOTE TIIAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS
ITOR YOUR PROJI.rcT BY DUCRIJASINC TIIU NUMBDR OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TITAT TIIE
Pt ANNING AND ITIWIRONMINTAL CoMMISSION (PEC) MAY STIPULATU. ALL CONDITIONS OI"
APPROVAL MUST BE COMPILED WITII BEFOR-|i, A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUID.
7r
(
\
\
B.
c.
a
FOUR (4) COPES OF T1IB FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTEDJ
A. A written statement oftho pr€cise nature oftho variance requested and the regulation involoved The statcment
must also address:
1. The relationship ofthe request€d varjance to other existing or potential uscs and structiros in tho
vicinity.
2. The degree to which rclief from the strict or litenl inteprctation and cnforcernent of a specified
rcgulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of featment among sites in the vicinity
or to attain tho objcctives of tlis titlo v/ithout grant or special privilege.
3. The effoct ofthe variance on light and air, distribution ofpopulation, tansportation, haftrc
facilities, utilities, and public safety.
4. How your rcquest complies with Vail's Comprehensive Plan.
B. A to,pographic and/or improvement survey at a scale ofat least l" = 20' stamped by a Colorado licensod
surveyor including locations ofall existing improvomortg including grados and elcvations. Othcr elcments
which must bo shown arc parking and loading arcas, ingress and egresq landscaped ueas and utility and
drainage Gatures.
C. A site plan at a scalo of at loast l" = 20'showing existing and proposed buildings.
D. AII preliminary building elwations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimcnsions, general appeamrce,
scale and uso of all buildings and spaces existing and proposed on the 6ite.
E. A prcliminary title rcpolt to verify ownership and easoments.
F. lf the proposal is located in a multi-family development which has a homeowners' association, then written
approval from the association in zupport ofthe project must be r€ceived by a duly authorized agent for said
association.
G. Any additional material necessary for the review of the application as determined by the zoning adminis0ator.
i For interior modificationg an improvement s:uwey and site plan may be waived by tle zoning administator.
VI. TIMEREOIJIREMENTS
A. Tho Planning and Environmcntal Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A cornploto
application form and all accompanying material (as described above) must bc submitted a minimum offour
(4) wceks prior to thc date of thc PEC public hearing. No incomplete applications (as detamined by the
zoning administator) will be accepted by the planning staff before or a{ter the designed zubmifial date.
B. Atl PEC approved variances shall lapse if consouction is not commehced within two years of the date of
. approval and diligently pursued to complefion
VII. OTIIER
A. If this application rcquir€s a soparate rcview by any Local, State or Fedcral agency other than thc Town of Vail,
the application fee shall be increased by $200.00. E:ramples of such reviow, may include, but aro not limited
to: Colorado Department of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 4M, etc.
B. The applicant shall bo rosponsible for paying any publishing fees which ara in excoss of 50% of tho application
fee. I[, at tho applicant's requost, any mattcr is postponed for hearing, causing thc mattor to be rc-publishod
then, the entire fee for zuch re-publication shall be paid by the applicanl
C. Applications deemed by the Community Development Dcpartment to have significant dosign, lmd use or other
issres which may have a significant impact on the community may require reviow by consultmts other than
town staff, Should a determination be made by the town staffthat an outside consultant is necded to review any
application, Community Developmcnt may hir€ an outside consultant, it ehall estimats the amount of monoy
necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by thc applicant at the tirne he files
his application with the Community Developmont D€pafiment. Upon completion of tho roviow of tho
application by the consultant, any oftho funds forwarded by thc applicmt for paymcnt ofthe consultant which
have not been paid to the consultant shall be retumed to th€ applicant. Expenses incunrd by the Town in
excess ofthe amount forwarded by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30 days of
notification by tlte Town.
f:\everyone\formsVariance.4 I 7
V. Following is a list of variances requested by the Lodge at Lionshead as they relate to
the Preliminary Entry Grading Plan prepared on May 17,1996 by Fieldscape
Incorp orate d;
1. Variance to regulation i8.58.020, Fences, Hedges, Walls, and Screening,
regarding a wall in the 20' front setback of greater than 3' height. The wall
proposed is both a sign wall with a project identification logo and address
attached to it on the street side as well as a retaining wall which is 5'-6" ht.
maximum on the building side as is only as high on the street side as required
to hold back soil and mulch (approximately 4" height). As a sign wall, a 3'
height is insufficient, as snow will cover the sign with relatively little snowfall
season long. The wall acts as a retaining wall as it is traced to the east. At its
maximum retaining height, 5'-6", the wall poses no visual obstruction to views
from the street toward the Library; it simply retains soi-l on the downhill side. It
is the view of the Owners that this is a conforming wall in that it is only 4"
high wall as it relates to public land.
2. Variance to regulation 18.20.140, Parking and Loading, regarding parking in the
20' front setback. The existing condition is a non<onforming sihration as 2 of
the 5 parking spaces are within the 20' setback. The proposal consists of placing
portions of all six spaces within the setback. The Owners feel that no other
configuration of drive aisle and parking can conform to this regulation. The
spirit of this regulation/ as we understand it, is to minimize the exposure of
asphalt and automobiles to public appearance. The proposed configuration is
far better than the existing configuration, as all views are screened to parked
cars; the existing condition, or a modification thereof, presents a situation
where all six cars, the entry drive, and asphalt area between the spaces area
clearly visible from the street with no opportunity for screening.
3. Variance to regulation 78.2A.1.40, Parking and Loading, requiring 75o/o of all
parking spaces for a project to be covered or concealed from view. The total
number of spaces in the property now totals eighteen; six below ground, six
above. 75o/" of 18 is 13.5 spaces required for screening, leaving one or two above
ground subject to this regulation. The existing condition also includes a car
port which is neither functional nor aesthetically pleasing to the Town or the
Homeowners. Part of this effort is to improve this condition by eliminating the
car port. As described in #2, above, all spaces will receive landscape screening
by positioning parking spaces next to existing mature spruce and aspen as well
as transplanting those trees affected by the reconfigured entry drive to areas
between parking spaces and along the road, effectively screening from view all
parking spaces from public view. We feel this orientation exceeds the
regulation by concealing at least four of the six parking spaces from view.
4. Variance to the standard pertaining to drive aisle widths. After review of
the proposed plan with the Town Engineering Departrnent, we have resolved
that the required 22' dive aisle width can be suitably reduced to a 20'drive aisle
minimum, a standard incorporated in the plan. Concem over access to two of
the six spaces was expressed which was addressed by a widening of the drive
aisle to 2'l'-6". lNe feel this regulation is not in conflict with the Town Staff.
o
THIS ITEM
o
RTY MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPE
PUBLIC NOTICE
NoTlcE ls HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environm-erta.l commission ol the Town of Vail
will hold a pubtic heiring-in aicoiOanc" witn Section 18'66'060 of.the.Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail on Juty B, 16U:%lz?d;.rfr. i""ti'. i.*n'ot vair Municipal Building. ln consideration ol:
Arequestforanexterioradditionutilizingthe2S0ordinance, locatedatTSl PotatoPatch/Lot21'
Potato Patch.
Apolicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy
Pidnner: Dominic Mauriello
Arequestforaworksessiontodiscussparkingand.retainingwl|l."js,htvariancestoallow|orthe
construction ot "
n"* p*[ild;.;;ilri. L.dde aif-ionsneiO' located at 380 East Lionshead
yDircle/Lot 6. Block 2. Vail Lionshead' zno Flllng'
filpticant: Lodge at Lionshead, represented by Ric Fields v Pianner: Dominic Mauriello
A requesl tor front and side setback variance to allow for a residential addition to the Messenbaugh
residbnce. tocated ii gzo rai*ay courvlot 5, Vail Village 1oth Filing.
Applicant:RobertandHildegardMessenbaugh,representedbyMikeGuida Planner: George Ruther
A request for worksession to discuss a conditional,ulq,q,t-t1it.1^o.rS,Proposed addition to the vail
Cha6iel, located at 19 Vail RoadrTract J, Block 7, Vail Village l st Frllng.
Applicant: VailReligiousFoundation Pianner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a conditional use permit, a density and front setback variance to allow for a Type ll
EHU above tne exiJiing" ga,-.S.ito.iGJ"1227'Rockledge Road/Lot 13A, Block 7, VailVillage 1st
Filing.
Applicant: Steve KirbY Pianner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a setback variance to allow for a snowmelt boiler to encroach 5.5 feet into a sideyard
setbdck. located at 2049 Sunburst Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley 4th Filing.
Landon and Mary Hilliard, represented by Larry Eskwith
George Ruther
Applicant:
Planner:
llllllllll
Sign language interpretafion available upon requesl with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-21 14 voice or 479-2356 TDD
for information.
Communttv Developmenl Deparlment
Published iune 21 . 1996 in the Vail Trail.
revised MEMO
To: Lodge at Lionshead Phase III File
From: Dominic Mauriello, Planner
Date: June24, 1996
Re: Existing Conditions Lodge at Lionshead Phase III
This memo is intended to clarifr some existing site conditions'
Zonng: ThelotiszonedHDMF (29%)andMDMF (71%)'
Lot size: 0.9822 acres or 42,784'632 sq. ft'.
Units: 12 units on site
GRFA: The density and GRFA for the site is determined by applying the density provisions
for each zoning andthen addingthe two'
HDMF (29%of lot)
t2,4O7.54l sq. ft. ofUIifUFarea X 60 sq. ft. of GMA./ 100 *q.ft.oflot area= 7144'53 sq. ft. ofGRFA
MDMF (71% of lot)
30,377.O8g sq. ft. of MDMF area X35sq. ft. ofGRIA/lOosq. ft. oflot ar€a= 10,531.981 sq' ft. of GRFA
Total GRFA allowed = 18,076'51 sq. ft.
Existing GRFA = 20,043 sq. ft'
This catculation does not include any cornmon area above the 35% credit (6,326.78 sq. ft')
allowed. (According to Jeff Bailey, Manager of the Lodge at Lionshead, 5 units are I ,65 I
sq. ft., 3 units are 1,546 sq. ft., 2 units arc 1,569 sq. ft., unit ll is 1.944 sq. ft., and unit 12
is 2,068 sq. ft.)
Density; 19 units allowable
Parking:Existing=l8spaces(l2underground,3incarport,and3surface)
Required = 25 sPaces (19 enclosed)
f:\dominic\wpfiles\,rnemos\lodge3.wpd
o o
TOWN OF VAIL
DEP^NT]TIEI'T OF CO}I\IU}SITI' DE\T,LOPIIIEI\T
ADDR.ESS DATE
I
PRO'ECT :. Q
CHECXS MADE ' YASLE TO TO$T{ OF T'AIL
ACOOT T-\O.
0l 00004t540 ZONING AND ADDRESS MAPS s5.00
0i oo00 424 i 5 UMFORT{ BUILDING CODE 554.00
0l 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBIn"G CODE sJ9.00
0l 0000 424 l 5 UNIFORM N,lECHANICAL CODE s37.00
0l 0000 1211 5 LTNIFORI,I FIRE CODE $36.00
,I 0000.12415 NATIONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE s37.00
0l @00 4:415 OTIIER CODE BOOKS
0l 0000 41i18 BLUE PzuNTS {N{YLARS 57.00
0 I oo00 424 12 xrKox L0PlLs s0.25
0l oo00 42412 S I UDII,S
0l 0000 42412 TOVFEES CON1PUTER PROGRAM 5t.0u
0l u)00 4li7l PENALTY FEES i R.E-I}iSPECTIONS
0l 0000 41332 PLAN RE\IIEW RE.CHECK FEE fS4O PER HR.
0t oo00 423i2 OFF HOURS TNSPECTION FEES
0l 0000 11,112 CONTRACTORS L]CENSES FEES
0l oo00 41.11i S,IGN APPLIC..\TION FEE s20.00
0l 0000 Jt4l3 ADDI I IONAL SIGNAGL, FEE IS I .OO PER SQ.FI
0l 0000 42-1-10 VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
01 0000 41,ji I PRE PAID DESIGN REV]EW BOARD FEE
01 tl(}00.4li7l INVh,S I IGA I ION fbE I BUILDINC
FI
;l
i 1 0000 .1_s I l0 TOV PARXING FUND
0l ooo0 2:027 IOV Nb\\'SPAPER DISPENSER FUND * 0l 0000 21112 T;L{ABLE@JJM * 0l 0000,11010 r,L\AtsLE (4 d.0Z (TOWN
0l 0000 42i71 BUILDlNG INvESTIGATION
I IILR
PEC A-PPLIC.{,TIO,r- FEES
0 r oo00 4l 330 ADDITION.{L GRFA "250 s200.00
0l (X)oo4tjiO CONDITIONAL USE PERNflT s200.00
0l 0000 4l i30 bXI ERIOR .ALTERATION LESS T}IAN lOO SO.FT.s200.00
0l fi)0041ji0 h,.\ I IruOR ALTLRATION N{ORE TI]AN IOO SO.FT.s500.00
0i 0000 4lji0 SPL.LIAL IJtvtLOPIIhNT DISTRICT In*EW s 1.500.00
0l 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TMAJOR A}{END s1,000.00 0l oo004l3i0 SPECIAL DEVELOPI\,I ENT DISTRICT IT4INOR AT,IEND S2IJU.UO
0t 0000 41i30 SUBDIVISION
0t oo00 41i30 VARIANCE s250.00 29t.ao 0l 0000413i0 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS s250.00
0l 0000 413_r0 RE. ZONING s200.00
OTHER
OTHER
:OMME\TS:
lror/.L: 75bO0
CA55 I t cx.'M.OL]
o O
ls 'rEM "irrair,fftlYouR
PRoPEo
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail
will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town
ol Vail on June 24, 1996, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of:
A request for an interior remodel, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at
2943 Bellflowerl Lot 4, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant:Frank Bannister
Lauren Waterton Planner:
A request for a conditional use permit to allow for the alteration ol the Vail Transportation Center,
focated at242S. Frontage Road.
Applicant: Town of Vail Public Works Planner: Dominic Mauriello
A request to construct a trailhead parking area, located at Red Sandstone Road/Parcel A, Lions
Ridge 1st filing.
Applicant:1Oth Mtn. Division
Russ Forrest Planner:
A request for a conditional use permit, a density and front setback variance to allow for a Type ll
EHU above the existing garage, located at 227 Rockledge Road/Lot 13A, Block 7, VailVilldje 1st
Filing.
Applicant: Steve Kirby Planner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for an interior remodel utilizing the 250 Ordinance, located at 427 Forest Road/Lot 4,
Block 2 Vail Village 3rd filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Henry Kravis
Lauren Waterton
A request for. an interior remodel utilizin-g the 250 Ordinance, located at S48 S. Frontage
RoadArVestwind Condominiums, Unit #305.
Applicant: Jim Beedie, represented by Mike Haselhorst Planner: Lauren Waterton
I regqest for a minor subdivision of Lots 2 and TiBlock B, Vail Das Schone #.l, located at2446 and
2450 Chamonix Lane.
Applicant: Karin Scheidegger Planner: George Ruther
14 request for a worksession to discuss a parking and retaining wall height variance to allow for the - ]^^struction of a new parking area at the Lodge at Lionshead, located at ggO East Lionshead
Xrcle/Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Lionshead, 2nd Filing.
fpplicant: Lodge at Lionshead, represented by Fic Fields Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Sign language interprelation availabte upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call479-21 14 voice or 47g-2356 TDD
for informalion.
Community Development Deparlment
Published June 7, 1996 in the Vail Trail.
Prinbed bY Dominic Mauriel lo 8 /95 2:54pm
From: Dorninic Maurieflo
TO:
Dominic t"tauriel1o, Gregg Barrle,
Terri Martinez' Todd oppenheimer
Subj ect : IJodge at L,ionsbead MECOPY
==-NorE-==- 2/ 08/95==2:54Pm==
CC: Mike Mollica
r just wanted to recap tshe with Ric
discussion Fields of from our meeting
2/8/96 -
1, The two entrances to Ehis properEy
cannot be combined to create one drive
due to extrene grades anCl trees' rt
was agreed that two entrances could
remain,
2. The plan as submitted was
unaccept-a-ble. Tt. was agreed. by staff
that the existing configuration of the
parking should be moclified to inprove
qrades and Clrainage- The Parking
6tructure could be removed. Regradingi
of the landscape area should occur to
improve drainage.
3, A variance for parking in the front
setback could be supPorted due to
ilrainage and grade problems on site for
reconstruction in the exi s ting
configuration (i.e., west portion of
rhe siEe).
T believe ehis sunmarizes the major
issues and decisions maile a! the
meetr-ng.
Dominic
o o
'T 3JR
.J. -t,o
DATE
AIPINE ENGIN ERING, INC.PACE ,I oF I PAGES
PROJECT
o
I
Edwards Busincss Center\P.O. Box 97
Edwards, CO 81632
PH: (970) 926-3373 (e7o) 976-3390
FACSIMILE TRA}i
To:
Co:
Fax #:
To;
Co:
Fax #:
To:
Co:
Fax #:
From;
!
I
Nunber of Pages (including cover sheet):
i
Trrnsrnitted:
for approval
for rcview and commcnt for your record
To:
Co:
Fax #:
To:
Clo:
Far< f:
To:
Co:
Fax #:
I
;+- i F-'r t t ..-\ i.^-- Zll<- bv<ta C-
Datc: J:7-? a
revierved
otber
tbr vour use
Renrrks:
Con,Edcntialiq Sl{tementi i This facsimite rransmission snd any ar:r,ompan},ing docume s contain information belocging lo the sendcr which rnuy be cont'i<ienrial and legally privileged. ihir-infonnarion is inlendcd only for thc use of thc individual or qbrif_v to u'hom this facsirtrilc transnrission was sent as indicsred above. lf you orc nol tbc intended rccipient, ariy discloswe. copying. distribution or actiorr ra.ken in reliance on lhe contents (,f rlc
i:I:x'3li:l-."-l.i:j.t:i::A'-{::'."::..,.-: i-::-=i{y yl:',:i$::9.-..lf r::,.,-.1,.;.: :.:.:.:'-i:::: ::t' :r":i:p:::-.'.^
ALPINE
rNc
7t (E DeT o
RetUm tO Lauren llaterton
Town Planner
INTEB.DEPABTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT:
DATE SUB
of e,
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
-z-lz-t l1
t
BHIEF OESCRIPTION OF. THE PROPOSAL:
AaJo t/rynoN DF Dt2-{U@r^rft./ , .t\trp +{6il -rp DAUE
A
fYt>D' L Lftr.\b5cAPr NG._
4a'=---- .c5'
Date: / '/ '/' /'
Comments:o 7 a"'-=2,>'''z S
ti.d t lriYg?
FIBE DEPARTMENT
tavir.A 8/L7 /91
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPI.,TCATION . TOWN OF VATL,
DATE RECETVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
t*t*rt*!att*ilIIilJ
E\J. t]EPT D I.
A.DESCRIPTION:
TYPE OF REVIEWT
New ConsE.rucE.ion ($200. 00)
ADDRESS: 22
Addit.ion ($50.00)
.-" l(inor A1 teraEion -,,/ Conceptual Review
D'FTnhr.Lot lock ll
is described by a meets and bounds please provide on a separaee sheeE.i.cation.
($20 . 00 )
t$0 ) --.,
e
D.LEGAL DESCRI
Subdivision
If propert.y
description,
t.o this appl
1egal
and at.tach
F.ZONING:MDtte
NAME OF APPLICA}TT:Mailinq Address: i-t * \E -\ l-^Jw -tr Nlr v/-v \ l+:5
Phone L\-1 Lo-e7(?(=)A\L-r (-o l(r51
NAI{E OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE : hTO PE,I)/- , FTTI.s>C' 'I@.uuitins tddr"""' ,f;:j fr! iTit F;;;; E ;;;:a
NAME OP OWNER (S) : Iltez Ld>tr?. p Lr tri+l eA) A+^12- lll fb^r.P.'-\JElA4- 4<a).
QWNER(SI SIGNATURE:Mailinq Address:
Phone
APPLTCATTONS WILL NOI BE PROCESSED WI,THOUT O'{NER'S STCIUT?UR8
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are t,o be paid at Lhe
tj-me of submittal of the DRB application. Later, when applying f or a building permic, please identify t,he accurat.e valuaLion of the proposal . The Town of vail will adjust the fee according to the table befow, to ensure the correct fee
i c n: i d
FEE PATD: $ CHECK *: DATE: BY:
FEE SCHEDULE:
l-t-
I.
J.
VALUATION
$ 0 $ 10,.i i", n''ji $ 5U,
./ $ 50, 001 $ 1.50,
$1s0,001 - $ s00,
$500, 001 - $1, 000,
$ Over $1, 000,
FEE
$ 20.00
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200 . 00
$400.00
$s00.00
ONE YE"AR AIIFER FTNAI,
ISSUED AIVD CONSTRUCTION
000
iiiiu
000
000
000
000
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAIT EXPIRES
APPROVAIJ I'NLESS A BUIIJDING PERMTT IS
IS STARTED.
rI ,*"-o""orto" r"ur-*n,
A pre-application meeting with a member of the planning
staff is encouraged to det.ermine if any additional
annl icafion information is needed. It is che applicant ' s syP44v$v+v--responsibility to make an appoinEmenc with the st.af f t.o ' determine if there are additional submiEEal reguirernents.
Please noEe that a COMPLETE applicat.ion will screa:nline the
rewiew process for your project.
III. TMPORTAIfT NOTTCE REGARDTNG AIL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the
applicant must. stake and tape the project site to
indicaLe property Iines, build.ing Iines and building
corners, AII trees to be removed musE be taped. AI1 siLe tapings and staking must be compleLed prior to the
DRB sibe visiL. The applicant musE ensure thaL staking
done during the winter is not buried by snow.
The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires
two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a
conceptual review and a final review.
Applicancs who fail to appear before Ehe Design Review
Board on Lheir scheduled meeting daLe and who have not.
asked in advance that di-sr:ussion on their ite$ be posLponed, will have Lheir items removed from the DRB
agenda until such time as Lhe item has been
ronr rh I i clr oA
The f n'l I nwinn i f omq n:w e I tho digqf gLiOn Of the !r.rYfLLrll9ll|9.'
zoning adminisLrator, be approved by t,he Conmunit.y
Development DeparLmenL sLaff (i.e. a formal hearing before the DRB may noL be reguired):
Windows, skyliqhts and similar exterior changes which do not alLer the existino plane of the buildinq; and
b . Bui lding addi tions not. visibl-e f rom any other 1ot.or public space. AL the time such a proposal is submitteo, applicancs must include letters frorn adjacent property owne:s and,/or from the agenL ior or manager of any adjacenL condominium associaLion stating Lhe associatj.on approves of the addiLion.
F
If a properLy is locat.ed in a mapped hazard area (i.e.
snow avalanche. rockfal1, flood p1ain, debris flow,
wet.land, ecc.), a hazard sEudy musE be submiLted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing Lhe hazard report prior to Lhe issuance of a building permit.
AppLicants are encouraged Lo check wit.h a Town Planner prior to DRB appl j.cation t.o determine t.he relat.ionship
of f he nrontrrl-v f ^ a'l 'l m=nna,:l h5'afds .vHvr9jrl!g}J}l,gg..9!
For all resi.denLial consLrucLion:
Clearly indicat.e on t.he floor plans the inside face of the exterior sLruct.ural wal1s of Ehe
hrr i ldinrr. and
b. Irrdieale wiLh a dashed line on the siLe plan a four foot distance from Lhe exterior face of the
bu:-1ding walls or supporcing columns,
c. If DRB approves the application with condit.ions or modifications. all conditions of approval musL be
addressed prior to t.he applicat.ion f or a building
Dermr, c.
D
a t fV'*"n .o**r*u.on"
A. Three copies of a recent topographic survey, stamped by a CoLorado professional Licensed Surveyor, at a scale of L" = 20t or larger, on which Lhe following information is provided:
1. IJot area, and bui.ldable area when d.if ferenE than lot area.
2. Legal descripLion and physical address.
3. Two foot contour int,ervals unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or more, in which case, S 'conEour inuervals may be accept,ed.
4, fxisLing trees or groups of t,rees having trunks with diameters of 4" oi more, as measured from a point one foot above grade.
5. Rock out.croppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittenE st,reams,
al-.. )
6. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.),cenLerline of sLreams or creeks, required creek or st.ream setback, and 100-year flood p1ain, if applicable. Slopes of 40t or more sha11 be clearly delineaLed by cross hatching.
7. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landnark or sewer invert. This information must. be clearly stated on t.he survey so Ehat all measuremenes are based on the sane startJ.ng point. This is - particularly important for determining buildinq height, and dri.veway slope. See policy On Survey Information, for more informaLion regarding surveys.
8. Locations of the following musE be shown:
a. Size and Cl'I)e of drainage culvert.s, swales,
efa.
b. Exact location of exiscing utility service lines f rorn eheir source Eo Ehe sEructure,includinq:
Cable Tv Sewer Gas Telephone Water Elect.ric
c. All utility neLer locat,ions, including any pedestals Lo be located on site or in t,he riqht-of-way adjacent to the site.
d. Property lines - distances and bearings and a basis of bearing.
e. Indicat.e all easement,s identified on t.he subdivision pIat.
9. Provide spot elevations aE the edge of asphalE,along t.he.sEreet. front.age of the prope-.rf-y af.twenty-five foot intervals (25'), and a minimum of
one spot elevation on either side of the loL.
B. Site Plan
1. Locations of the following must be shown:
a. existing and finished grades.
b. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
Proposed driveway, irr"lirrg percent slope
and spot elevalions at the property line, I
qarage slab and as necessary along the
cenLerline of the drive to accuraLely reflect
driveway grade.
d. A 4 ' concrete drive pan aE. che edge of
asphalt for driweways Ehat exit Lhe street in
an uphi11 direction.
2. A11 existing improvements including sEructures,
landscaped areas, service areas. storage areas.walks, driveways, off -sCree! parking, -Ioading areas, reEaining walls (wittr Eop and bottom of
wa11 spot elevaLions), and oeher exisLing site
improvements.
3. In order to determine proposed building height,s
elevations of all top roof ridges, and eaves when
determined necessary by the zoning adminisbrat,or,
shall be indlcated on the site plan with exisuing
and proposed contour Lines shown underneatb.
C. Landscape Plan (1" = 20r or larger) - 3 copies reguired
L. At, a minimum, Lhe followinq informaEion must be
provj.ded on the landscape plan:
a, Location of existing Erees 4" diameLer or
larger,
b. Tl4)e, size and locabion of all exj.sting and
proposed plant. material ,
c. Locat.ion of all lrees to be t.ransplanEed,
d. A detailed legend of all proposed plant
material including conmon and lraEin narnes.
2. The location and type of existing and proposed
. watering systerns to be employed in caring for ptant mat.erial following its insEallat.ion.
3. Existing and proposed cont.our 1ines. ReEaining
waI1s should be included with t.he conLour
informat.ion with Eop of wa11 and bottom of wall
elevaLions listed.
4. CompleE.e Lhe aLtached landscape maLerials 1isE.
D. SiEr of f f rom each utilitv comoanv verifying t.he Iocation of ucility service and availabiliLy (see
at.Lached utiliEy verification form)
E. A prelirninarv tiLle reoort Schedule A and B must,
accompany all submittals, Eo insure property ownership
and identify all easemenEs affecLing Lhe subject
'.\ra17167'F\t
F. ArchitecLural Plans (!/8" = 1' or larger, 7/4" is preferred scale for review) 3 copies are required.
Floor plans and all el"evations of the proposed
developmenL drawn to scale and fu1ly dimensioned.
The elevaEion dlawiiigs rrrusL show boLh exisuing and
finished grades.
One set of f loor plans must. be rrred-lined" !o show
how the gross residenLial floor area (GRFA) was
ca1cu1at.ed.
Exlerior maLerials and colors shal1 be specified
on the at.tached mat,erials 1ist. This mat,erials
list must be completed and submitLed as a parE of
the applicaEion. Color chips, siding samples etc., shall be presented at the Design Review
Board meeting. DeEails including, bub not limit.ed
tlusciu, trim, rairings, "nt." cap, meLer locations, et.c. must be shown grraphically and
f u1Iy dirnens j.oned.
G. Zone check list (attached) must be compleEed if the projecE is locaEed within the Single-Fami1y,
Primary,/Secondary or Duplex zone districEs.
H. PhoLos of the existing site and where applicable, of
adj acent. s trucE,ures .
' :ff^?3:i3g 3p$ii:t3::I ;t3#: 3*#iI":equ-ire Lhe
specifications, samples and other mat.erials (including
a model) if deemed necessary to deLermine whether a project will comply wit.h Design Guidelines.
V. MTNOR AIJTERATIONS TO THE EXTERTOR OF BUILDTNGS.
PhoEos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopment proposal and Ehe locaLion (site plan) of the redevelopment.proposal may be submit.t.ed in lieu of the more formal requirements sec forEh above, provided al1 imporLant specificaEions for E.he proposal including colors and materials Lo be used are submitted.
VI . ADDITIONS - RESTDENTIAI OR COMMERCTAIJ
A. Original tloor plans with all specificat,ions shown.
B. Three sets of proposed floor plans 1/gtt = 1r or larger
- ll/Au = f is preferred)
C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and proposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevations with exi.sting and proposed grades shown underneaLh.
D, Elevations of proposed addiuion.
E. Phot.os of the existing sLructure.
F. Specifications for all maLerials and color samples on materials list (atcached) .
At, the request of Ehe Zoning AdminisErator you may also be required t,o submit:
c. A statement from each uLility verifying location of service and availabiliry. See atEached utility location verification form.
H. A site improvement survey, stanped by regist.ered
Colorado Professional Licensed surveyor.
I. A preliminary title reporL, to verify ownership of property, wbich lists all easements.
VII. FTNAT STTE PT,AN
Once a buildinq pe40it has been issued, a.nd coust-rr-leEj-on rs
underway, and before the Building Department, will schedule a framing inspection, two copies of an Improvement L,ocation Cercificat,e survey (rLC) scamped by a regisEered professional engineer must be submiEted. The following information must be provided on the ILC:
A. Building focat.ion(s) with Eies to property corners,i . e. di s t.ances and angl es .
B. Building dimenslons to the nearesE tenLh of a fooE.
arr ulity service line as-builJ7 srrowins type of material used, and size and exact locat.ion of lines.
Basis of bearing to lie to section corner.
A11 property pins are to be either found or set and stated on improvenent survey.
All easements.
carage s1ab elevaLions and all roof ridge elevations wich existing and proposed grades shown under Lhe rid.ge
l ines
VIII.EONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW
A. SubmittaL requirements: The owner or authorized agent of any project requiring design approval as prescribed
by t.his chapter may submit plans for conceptual review by Ehe Design Review Board to the Department of
Cormunity DevelopmenE,. The conceptual review is
intended to give Ehe applicant a basic underst.anding of the compatibilicy of their proposal with the Town,s
Design Guidelines. This procedure is recomrnended primarily for applicaEions more complex t.han single-family and t.wo-fanily residences. However, developers of single-family and two-fanily projects shall not. be
excluded from the opportunity to request a conceptual design review. Complete applications must be submitt.ed
10 workj-ng days prior Co a scheduled DRB meet.ing.
fhe following information shall be submiE.ted for a
conceptual review:
1. A concept.ual site and landscape plan aL a minimum scale of one inch equals twenEy feet;
2. Concept.ual elevat.ions showing ext.erior materials
and a description of the char-acter of the proposed structure or s Eruc bures ;
3. SufficienE information t.o show the proposal
complies with the development standard.s ef the
zone dist.rict in which E.he project is t.o be locat,ed (i. e. GRFA, sit.e coverage caLculaEions,
number of parking spaces, €Ec.);
4. Completed DRB application form.
B. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, t.he Department of Community
Development shall review the submiLLed materials for general compliance wj.t,h the appropriat.e reguirement,s of
Lhe zoning code. If Lhe proposal is in basic compliance wit.h the zoning code reguirenrenLs, Lhe project shalI be forwarded t.o the DRB for concepeual review. If the applicat.ion is noE generally in
compliance with zoning code reguirements, the application and submittal maEerials sha1l be returned t.o the applicant wiLh a writt,en explanation as bo why the CommuniEy Development DepartmenE. st,aff has found
t,he projecE not. to be in compliance wiLh zoning code requi.i:eroerrLs. Once a compleEe appliCat,ion has been received, Lhe DRB shall review the submitted conceptual review applicarion and support.ing maLerial in order lo
det.ermine whet.her or not. the projecE generally complies with the design guidelines. The DRB does not vot.e on
conceptual. reviews. The property owner or his representative shall be presents aE. Lhe DRB tlearing.
c.
n
G.
I'
A.
IJfST OF I'IATERIAL,S
NAI,IE OF PROJECI , (*b .pE>b*-^T Do.lq,Ar--,A,>
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT- BLOCK ST'BDIVISION
STREET ADDRESS z 4Op E2k;f uoJ:'.\eao o^rt-,
The foltowing informaLion is required for submitt,al to Ehe Design
Revj-ew Board before a final approval can be given:
BUII,DING MATERIAI,S:
Roof
(izlinzr
Obher wal1 Materials
Fascia
Soffi ts
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trirn
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
ReE,aining Wall.s
Exeerior lJighting
TYPE OF MATERIAI,COI,OR
OLher
LA}IDSCAPING:Nane of Designer: Gv. hec*tr.Phone: O4s.qoa+.
PIJANT *r"*l-,r,
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
Boianical Name
Cre f4euhl. PL{^JodL, PoA^5)
OuanLi tv Size*,
*Indicabe caliper for deciduous trees. Min-imum caliper for deciduous t,rees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous trees. Minimum heicrht for coniferous
traoq ic 6 foat **Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is
E rral'lnn
TyDe Square Footaoe
GROUND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRTGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROI.,
C. LANDSCAPE LfGHTING: If exLerior lighcing is proposed, please
show Ehe number of fixtures and locations on a separaLe liqhting p1an. Ident.ify each fixture from the liqhting plan in E.he space below and provide the height above grade, tlpe of light proposed, lumen ouLpuL, luminous area and a cut sheet, of the liqht. f ixture. (Seccion 18 . 54 . 050 .T)
a a<>Oe.2\prr*-p. r Utu e=r+r-' lpphOt1 , z)-4' Teu-.
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa11s, fences, swiruning pools, etc.) Please specify. rndicate heights of reEaining walls. Maximum heiqht of walls wi-thin the front setback is 3' . Maximum heiqht of wal1s elsewhere on the property is 6'
D,
te.ttBed 8/L7 /9a
JOB NAI.{E
TOWN OF VAIL UTILITY IJOCATTON VERTFICATTON FORM
SUBDIVISION
LOT BLOCK FIIJING
.frJJUJ(.tr 5 5
The form is used E.o verify service availabirity and location. This shoul.d be used in conjunction with preparingr your utiFity pran ana scheduling installations. For any new consiruccion proposal , Ehe appricant must. provide a compret,ed utilit.y verificacion- form.
The locat,ion and avaitabirity of uLilit.ies, wheLher t,hey be main t.runk lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by che following ut.ilities for the accompanyinq-iite plan.
All authorizing signat.ures need to be originals.
Authorized Siqnature Date
U.S. West Communications
458-6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
9 49 - 6735
Gary Ha11/Rich Cooley
HoIy Cross EIect.ric Assoc.
949 -5892 Engineering DepL,red Husky/Uichael LaverLy
**TCl Cablevision of Lhe Rockies
9 49 - L224
Mark Graves
**Llpper EagIe \./a11ey Water & Sani LaLion Dist,rict *
47 6 -7 480
Fred Has l ee
NOTE:
*tA siEe plan is required. physical locat,ion of knorvn ut,ilit,ies must, be shown on the sit,e pran. utirity locations may or may Dot offer service to tbe property line. Any utility exteasion rEquired shall be the responsibility of the property owner.
1. If a utility company has concerns wiEh the proposed construction, t.he utilit.y representative shouLd. not directly on the utility verification form that, there J.s a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be spelled out in deEail in an aEtached leteer to the Town of vaiI. However, please keep in mind t.hac it is t,he responsibiliEy of Ehe utiliEy company Lo resolve identified problems.
2. If the ut.ility verification form has signaEures frorn each of t.he ut.itity companies, and no comments are made direct.ly on the form, the Town will presume that Lhere are no problems and that the development can proceed.
3. These verificat.ions do not relieve the conLractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from t.he Town of VaiI, Department of public Works and to obtain utilitv locations before diooino rn any public right,-of-way or easenent in the Town of Vail. A buildino permit is not a street cut permit.A street cut permi_t. must be obtained separately.
4. Install.ation of service lines are at the expense and responsibility of the property owner.
Single Family
ZONE CIIECK
Residence, Duplex,
ZONE DISTRICTS
/Secondary
DATE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot _ Block
-
Subdivision
ADDRESS: abz> tP;i u a-l-4?_4r.. ct hctE
OWNER PHONE
L*)9tuQe-
ARCHITECT &rtA hbcoz.,, PHONE e+f.gr4^
7 rt\lEr I-rT <rnD T1.rn
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE BUIIJDABIJE I.JOT AREA
Existinq Proposed Total
o
Primary
H.iqrrr |./A
TOtAl GRFA MA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
s e t.backs F'ra1n l-
Sides
Rear
Qi Fe f'n'rrararra
T.and <r'-an i nn
Reta-ining $Ia1.1 Hei_ghts
Parking
(:.a ra.ro a 16A i t-
Drive:
Allowed
(30 ) (33 )
VIA + 425 =
tq{ + 425 =
2g' 2E
L3'Lo
w, 20
ss70
anmn l i pe wi Fh n a\ \7 T.i.r]''i i na rrr-A '_- *rnance
Water Course Setback (30) (50)
Do Finish Grades Exceed 2:1 (50t)
Environmental,/Hazards : 1) Flood pl-ain
1t lRl
PanrA
(300) (600) (900) (1200)
Permitted Slope lb t proposed
Yes
2) PercenE Slope (< > 3O%) Pl*
3) Geologic Hazards .,a) snow Avaranche NIA b) Rockfatl illt<c) DebrisFlF
- .,t,r 1t H,Fr ian..iq r!!!t!il-!
,
View Corridor Encroachment:Yes- No_
Tl .\ o c t.his request involve a 250 Addition?Er{r.rso u rllv\Jf ve, 4 zJv fl|rlLt.tLJ.ull' _l:.:_ \How much of the allowed 250 Addit.ion is used with this request,? \Prevj.ous condit.ions of approval (check properLy file) : \-
'_llllll--
,(b + i^ lt-l5ttlyau-
Enc I
.'t .-Slope .+ qilAl.
No
No t/
ela
10
FILEMPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
9 7 0-479-2 I s 8/479-2 I 3 9
FAX 970-479-24s2
Dep artment of C onnrunity D eve lopment
February l, 1996
Mr. Ric Fields
Fieldscapc
P.O. Box 1871
Avon, CO 81657
Re:Design Review Board Submittal for the Lodge at Lionshead
Dear Mr. Fields:
I have reviewed your application for a conceptual review ofthe above refercnced project by the
Design Review Board (DRB). The plans sbow items that require a variance (i.e. parking in the
front setback). It is a staffpolicy that no DRB review can occur until either, the plan is changed
to conform with Vail Zoning Code or a variance is approved through the Planning and
Environmental Commission. An application for a variance has bcen enclosed in case you wish to
pursue this avenue.
There are numerous issues with the design of this site that must be resolved before a variance
application can be processcd and a design review occur. The following is a list of comments and
issucs rvhich nccd to addfL'sscd: td rcllL.ctcd or't lllc \ltc Dtcrr:
l.Please submit a plan showing the entire site. Thirty percent of the site must be
landscaped. I nced this information to make this determination. Please also
provide a calculation on the plan ofproposed and existing conditions for: total
area; area paved: area containing structures; and area landscaped on site.
The plan shows parking in the front setback (20') which is not permitted. Please
correct the site plan.
Please provide a breakdovi'n of thc square footage of all uses on site (i.e.
residential by unit) and indicate the number ofparking spaccs provided on site for
this building. This is needed in order to determine number of required parking
spaces and to cnsurc this site mcets the 75%o enclosed parking rcquircmcnt.
The walls proposed in the front setback cxcccd thc 3'hcight liuriiaiion which is not
pagc I of3
2.
3.
,.t.
{p *"n"uo'u"^
Tqffi
\ 7'
.o-t---"
5.
6.
permitted. All walls proposed elsewhere which are over 4' in height must be
e;rlg" by an engineei (piofessional seal required on plan)' Please revise the plan
accudingly.
The.parking area extends beyond the indicated west property line. Ple-ase provide
a note on G plan that exphLs the use of this property and its ownership' Also'
the two parking spaces in this area are angled in such a way as to encourage
backing into the right-of-way. This should be corected'
This plan is not consistent with Public Works drawings for the widening of the
streets adjacent to the site. Please contact Greg Hall, Town Engineer to discuss
potcntial impacts and necessary revisions.
Tbe Town of \rail Steetscape N{aster Plan, dated November 20,1997, states that
..the Lodge at Lionshead should be encouraged to consotdate their driveways
along East Lionshead Circle. This would firrther reduce pedestrian/vehicular
.ordi.tr on East Lionshead Circle." Staff believes that this is the appropriate time
to address this issue. I have been out to the site and it appears that this can be
accomplished. The existing drive to the $'est of the drive sho$rr on tle plans
canld be widened to accommodate ingress and egress for this site. Please revise
the plans accordingly,
Staffbelieves that the parking area could be redesigned to reduce the amount of
paving on site. The parking could be concentrated on the west side of the lot'
leaving the east as landscaped area.
The plans show a sidewalk provided on East Lionshead Circle. Is this to be
accomplished by the lodge or others? Make a clear indication on the site plan'
Please provide a legal description on the site plan.
Please indicate any proposed lighting for the site on the plan with details sheets
(cut sheets) attached.
Please indicate on the landscape plan the location of existing trees, the location of
tees being relocated, trees being removed, and the size and type of all trees'
Provide a current siped and stamped survey of the property showing spot
elevations (2 copies).
Aisle u.idths must be at least 22' for parking lots and drives' Please revise the plan
accordingly.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
page2 of3
15'Youmustshowprqlosedcontoursintheparkinganddriveareaontheplan.
i6.Aturnaroundneedstobeprovi<ledintheparkinglot.Itmusthavea20'centerline
radius from the closest parking stall'
17. Todd oppenheimer of the Public works Deparbnent has identified sme potential
errors with the contours shown on the proposed grading plan'- He wilf b;
producingad.ditionalcomm€'ltsandyoumaywantto"6al2glhim.directlyto
discuss those cornments'
please revise your submittal and indicate to me what your plans are colco:ring variance issues'
These comments must be addressed before this item ianpioceed any further' I recommend
scheduling a meeting with me and a rqresentative of tnJpublio Work Deparhent to discuss
issues identified in this conespondencJ. tf you have any questions call me at 479'2148' A
schedule of meetings and submittal dates has also been enclosed for your information'
'ffif il,*t4
Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP
Town Planner
Susan Connelly, Director of Comnunity Development
Mike Mollica, Assistant Director of Community Development
Terri Martinez, Assistant Town Engineer
f:\ttc6llic\erpftL!\lctttf!$olrn N-v,Pd
page 3 of3
MEMORAI\IDTJM
To: Dominic Mauriello
From: Todd OPPenheimer
Date: FebruarY l, 1996
RE' Comments on Lodge at Lionshead zubmittal'
Post-it" Fax Note 7671 D-ate:14;/1L ll"lL"> u I
Tot . I L r.i t-'Pl,t'>
Co./Dept.Co. - l-: ., I I A\r
Phone #Phone #
r^' * '/15 - 1ct ','^"n AJL;hi.-l hu^s-t1
l.SubmittedprojectreliesontheTownsproposedprojecttofirnctionasdesigned.Theextentof
the improvements on E.Lii cir.l" hn' not yet-teen'fn"iiJ*a is dependent on completion of a
;t"d; "*aisal on the RoW easements needed'
2.PermyphonemessagethereisabustinFieldscapescontorrrs.Itappearsthecontowlabeled
44 at the top of the ct ot" snoordo,t be there 1it ir u"'""t ul. The contour labeled 43 should move
uphillabout2,5,andconnecttothe44contourcrossingthesidewalk.Allcontourstotheeast
would drop 1 number. yoo can pass this utoog to Ri. is a preliminary comment but I do need to
discuss it with Engineering'
3.UsingtherevisedcontourVelevationsthedrivewaygradebecomesa!9ut7.5%ratherthanthe
5% indicated. Existing;;;;;t;i2% so itis stilian impto"ement' Verifo grade
requtements with Engineerin g'
4.Theseplanswillhavetobecoordinatedw.iththeTownsplansforthestreetimprovements
once the contour probl.r. i. .esotued. Initial check indicatei that the will probably work out
okay.
5.Iwouldprefertoseethisparkingaccomplishedwithlessasphalt.Combiningthe4spaces
alongE.LH'Circleandplacingthe.landscapingateachendcouldhelp.S'Drivewaywidthsare
beloiv standard' Refer to Engineering for specrttc concerns'
6. It appears there is not sufficient snow storage space allocated' The changes proposed in
comment #6 could helP here also'
7.The7'+wallheightisexcessiveandwouldrequireaguardrailatthetop'Thewallisalsoto
close to the sidewatt toallow sufficient landscape spac.e31j tt"Y Y-igt The bottom wall
elevation shown at the east end does not .orr.rpood with the contours in the area' The correct
elevationisprobablyz,lower.Thediscrepancyinthecontoursmayeffecttheoverallwall
heights.
8.Nativewindflowersarenotanappropriategroundcovermaterialalongthesidewalk'If
flowers are desired th.y JoJa t" ,nairrtinealerennials ( and no the Town is not going to
maintain them), The r6', Colo Blue Spruce errcroaches onthe site distance triangle which needs to
be maintained. Sp*." ,not'td not be any further north than the end of the fence'
g.TownplansincludeaStreetlightatthetopofthechuteaboutduewestofthegate.This
lo"otioo conflicts with some shrub material shown on the plan'
FEE}-S1-slEi IO.E3 FROM.'''if r GUARANTEE VAIL ID! 3@3 476 4534
-
t-t
I
LAND TI TLE
o
/r+g|rt
,F tLt f-r
G'i.a
{)"E ll t rrl at a..l{
e (J
3t
B
'lt
cE
I a u !lN I i FO OO
f|ir oer E\!s tu {c, "'clt
ot||io rt
:B al.o o
tro 8r ot It
THETIDIO BXI|IIT? A
80 mllmillxlut DEclanrTlolf toR
tII' IPEIE A! I.TOilEHltD PII,ttI III
ttaa
TICAL
trt€rl lt
'|lt
l, Vall/t lonlhrad
n ,|
J t
Ft
:r8 c o
':
i
IrE l, r rrruElvlrlon of l.t l, llocl -.GorC flllng, lhglr Corrnty. colorrdo
Prrc.I lr
'lfE.ctr t rnd J, Yrll/Llonrhrrd tlrrt Fltlng, Erglr County'
eclor.do
, trDt.ct to tlr tcllorlngt
1. llrcllrrnt Lloruhud Ptrrrr lllr lnG'l.Jolhrd by .Llonr-hert llrmr fri conacrlnlui rcnrg.!.!F liroclrtlon' -tnc.' h'rory
illiti"I"-tf,;-rcrl,;il-6i-r.t-dnlniao pter tt - condonlnluf, tnaolr-
Eiiii,-rrc. ;--th.it;ftilr;il;-iiaii. inc atrlenr, rn lrrnnt lor
iilliri r"i rgr'r-ti-ittr iaiSr rt t lenth'di on loot or by
frriicir, upon-rnd rsroll-tiic€r r id ir, vrtl/Llonrhred ?lrrt
iiiini,'riii- eilut[ ,-iotiilioe.rtrd lpgn -rna -ierofr- thr drlv*v
lertrd thirron, tor th. tolloillnq prit& rnd upon thr tollcrlng
cflralSlon.t
I' frlctr I rnd ,ll, rnd llhr drly!!!I -thenon'-crl9l; -
n Ut lrloilrC io-iionlft.rC lfr1r.tt. tn 1e?5-Fh6r Il lnrt.ll"
r sltcol h.rtlnt rt;iil-i;-tir drtvrrrt-lor.th'-E!P!?? "l rriolnc lt trrr of'Ier-rnd iior. fn iirf, tn co-nnrctlcn rlth thr
ffi5i'fri"iioi-Ji i'ioiitroc-nritr trr, -iracir I rnd J' ltrcludlttg
il;-a;Filii,-ifr dmdrd to Dhilr lll bt Plra|r-rl bocrur''
Jithc,rt snii, errrr.-iii-r"iicc -iurrlcirnt land-to procmd rlth
c6niinrction. rn irl"in-iJi ptretc lttr dr.d ol ?riotr I rtld t to
Plt|r. ItI, on or r[oit-llciluir fz,. l9?7, Ph.rr tII grrnC'd th'
lnqrrlv.grm. luulnt-gricifurc ibovl io Fharr rl Araoclatlon'
ililud'E-€o-iir Conforlnlur Drclaratfon tor tht Phcm III Condo'
fiiiil'-ir"i."-d, in'-iGtiil ri(rl, vhlch ruthotltos Phrfr Irl ito
riliuf fii-i"cl6r-cr.i[-ut-ttiti iira otnrr rarrf,rnEt rntl'/or rlghtr
Ii-iiF-6n-InL-irf,i-iircii[.a' rugvr tn prrrgreph e_ rconrllt|nt
Iiti-ln.-ioniio.inilr-ovnrirnlp ot -thf rlctrct !?! t]! l""t fillriltr ot rll cf-ttri Otniri rnd thr-trioclatlon ln ordrr t'o
ilil-o.nr.;- ani 0ifGl-ttriougho.t l,lcnrhrad Fh'- I and ll.i
b. 'I"fp rdrlvrurltr rhell bc eenrldrrr4 lor all pur-
Dor.r Cc t;;fuai--thr eorppir rtr rrplurntlry th! north-routh -iif,toi-t ifi;i''-rt e'[ Llonrhred Elrele (thr .t'_of ths T]
fii-.il iei,cnr-iirotnr rnto rhr therr tr rhd phur lll undcr-
316 -PAGE 2
|{o tl
8
lr i4t
i ',f
i'd i.,
I
FEE-O t -StE 10'el4 FROM'LAND TI TLE GUARANTEE VAIL
o
rD' 363 4?t 4534
/
PAGE 3
tt I |'r
!I
dr |l N
o r!
19 l,r
€(.,
o
It F |!
6
F
grourrl gtr.g.r. uD to thr doorr of thr rrtprctlvl garagrr (tho
rr'rr ot thr fl '
c. Thlr rertncnt;htll contlnue slthout Ilrltrtl('n
lor lo lcng er lrionrtrceO Phrtr tl CondollnlUil A;foclrBlon, ltrc.
oayt to Lt6nehcrd Pharr ltI Condonlnlul thnrflrrnt Araoclrtion,
iiil. -"uiiil;a-g; rirrtnq by Ltonshc.d p'hnrc ttr condonlnlur
;;;;i;;;;;;;;1.;i;i, in.l. iro thlrdr o! th. cort ot !u'l ur'd -t;'fi;t-t;.-a.ivirey. ind oni hrlt o( rll orhc? cort. lncurpd by
ii"nrtrseO Phe11 ItI-GOndorlnlurn fianage;Gnt.lrloclit ion, lnc.,
Iirflli-to-I[i-aiivrJiy or rny portt5n thcraofl lnctudlng but not
iltiafu to rclntrnenerl upt4!. rnoy rrnoYrl and Sprovcpnt, lt
ni.ltrirv. Fhrrr IrI inrir bi rrrponrlbh tor an6 rhlll .ptcyldr Irti-rii"it hartlng' rrlntanrncr, upter', tnou-reroYal rnd lr-
;;;r;;;a-oi-iti iiitv.t"y, tor itr-bGnillt tnd th. btncllt or thf
fi"iOrir o! thr rrr6.nt,-iubloct only to tha rhrrlng-ol cortr
lp.iiitra rtovr. Ttrh iarcrint nay ic tonlnatod only ttpon
oieurrrncr of th. lolloYlngt
(ft Irlttrn hotlco ot.lallure to p'tt, rlth rtrE'-
rant of llountl eurar-iini'-$;'u.s' rrll, Fortrgr lrlprtd' errtl-
iila iitnrn irerrpt irqrrertci, to thc lrrt lnoun rddrtrr ol
lionrnraC thr.. Ii Cond-orlnlur Arrocltttonr Inc' t
(lll Frllrrrr to pay rtounEt du' rr 'trtcd ln th'
noglct rlthln rri oiyi oi rmrlpt ir rush notlct' lr r'fl'ct'd on
thr rrturn rrcrlPtl and
(tlll ftftnq by thc Pr'rldGnt of Llanrhrrd Phrrl
III Gcndotfnfur'*iiiglilnt-reioclatlon, _ Inc. ot, en rtlldavlt
rrllrctlm rtt frctl",ieeor-di"i-irrrtnitton ot th. crloncnt vtth
lii-iiiir-rnd n.aorirr ol lagtc eounty. colorldo'
l. Trxrt lnd othrr Prrlodlc Gharqcr hvlrd ogrlnrt thr
.uDtfst proD.tty not yrt dur or Pryablr'
t. tr.arang tcr utlllty purPolat ar ahosn on thr recordrd
plit ol r|ld r.ruHlvlrlon.
f . Rctalcilonr rlrlsh do nst,conGaln r torlrlturl or
rwrr€ir c-iiur, bui orlttlng rrltrlcllonr, ll rQYl bf:ta on r'G'
;;i;;;-;.rt;til; oi-nitionil'orlqln, il cont'aInrd- ln thr lnrtru-
iiil-ircoidid oitolrr t:, lt?lr In noot ?tl tt Prgo 9r9'
S.RlghtotthrProprlrtoro.avalncrlndetoortract rna rliovr-iir-oii thrrrlrin, rhould tha rrns-b! tound !o p!n3-
tirtl-oi rnciirect [ti--piirric! hrrcb], grrnrcd, rnd 8l9ht of rrv.
tor dltch6 Jnd ..ni'i. Eonllructrd by'tlir ruthorltv o!-tht unlteC
Statrr, rr rr.rrvrd ln unltcd statar-Prt'ntl rccord'd.xty 2rr
ii6il-ir-noii-ii ii ilsi r0r, end Efpr'brr r, lerr, ln BooI el
rt Prgr 9t.
It
C'I
o .lt
It
AND TI TLE
o FEE-et I -gEi 1E'. Ct5 FROM ' L
/r ,J,ir
ff I
t4
FI
$+'rl
'i.l
GUARANTEE VAIL ID. 3E ?Ei 4534 34 o
l. tmttlctlott. rhlch do not contrln r (orhlCu!. er r.vfrtar clrurr, but oilttlng rrftllctlonrr lt rny, bilrd on faco, Golof, rcltllono cr rlrtlonrl orlgln, aa contalnrd tn lnatnrrrrnt rrcerdrd Aprlt li. lt?o ln toolt tlt rt prg.6tt, JuIy lu. l9t0 ln Eool llf at Prgr lJl rnd octob.r lt, l97o ln Eook 'lt .t P.g. lgt.
t. turrtl|tr rr rhoen on thr s.Bordod DIat of Vrll./Llonrhmd ?lnt ftllttg.
cttto. B-it? P'ttl 01126191 0l:ttP PO I ot 3
PAGE
t
,?,.:#
.l'L
FEE-9l -ElEi tA=Eg FROM: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE VAIL ID. 363 4?Ei 4534
LAND rrTLE _tren.rxrnn connplkv 108 South Fronhge Road West #203 P,O. Box 357
Vait, CO g1652
(970) 476_22st
Fax 476-4514
1;^,1eS lLJ € . rrrr *b€rvr r r*_-rt 4'- 1.n.61g--+.gq.-3!)
PAGE 1
Sb,
4ufifltf==
Date:
To:
Fax #:
From:
Number
fl:t -zlsz._Phone:?lq - z.rr-rr
of Pages (including cover sheet):
,se contact the sender at (e70)476-2251
Message:(^-ezt+z-< c)f lfiF\\---tg*s*rr
!EirE*+,r r e. r r .'5A> r^_+.r=__-6q,
Z< ; T-€;6<..'g.3,F<rJ
For the thinl year in a row, our undemyriter, OLD RE,|IIBLIC NA1ONAL T*U ,fG,colvIPANy, is the onrv.,irtt *ari)iirr'to ,eceive o rtoiii-poyng ahw mting o! A+ fmm standard & poor's ''tne h4niit ,niiig ;'i"rn by s&p ro ooy tir,, ,nrur* to ctate!!!
.t^119.1:rh itrDcc trr}gl! Wcrr ,fjrr.l \.nil. CO il6J7 (970) a?6-rJ5l ptD,E (q7r,) 47#4j34 lir ml-B:thrult Rod ,1216 Avon, co 81620 /Strt nr.r .8 ,
- vHltl, PUBLIC_ td0RKS o 054792166 JHN 31 '96 13:06 N0.001 P.01 I
Dtpattmcat ol Pillr WcsblTttatpetntioa ?f Scrrl Fronttgc Rotd ' Vtilt Qolorsto tl6tz
,0t -11 9"2 I t il Ftx t0t.419 _2 I 66
TOWIT OFVAIL
TO:
COMPAIIY NAME: Ccr* Dat . .., .,.
EAX P}TONE NUMBER:4?*zqsz
8l;r PBOXE r.RrHSUrrIlI-i SHI!!
L)od\if\ {, }4quf I llo
FROM:
DATE !TIME I t:logrn
N0. OF PAGEB IN DOCUMENT (NOT TNCIJUDING CO\IER SHEET) r._
RESPONSE REQUIRED?i TJo
SENT BY:
TOTfN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/IRANSPORTA?ION FAX PHONE
NUMBER: (303) 4'19-2L66
hfiilnic:
tre*eare.tw. ot$<var*5 qf terl..rrcexra-rt5. P \e/r.c E trrar\ taA Opg+*refetor
,r$d Add \ut (n {lvl-$.r \o ttE t6l<rOQ g+\rr<..+Urfr' (€t{ftrf\r{\fs \A*fg,
f"nrrwltcvl nwnr .n '
A\ro, (reo.\ta\\ ra+oq5trtd o p,tcr n-"c,{ \+g:r Q i"a;n>g \*ele, We 6t€, 4.L\d.&?rrt \!
r\€{+}r(^4nlJv._$t rui gxogct+-l c$r\(jr (Trh;\S\c ffnF$\+ 5G',,1 <.nrtctrtefrcA\rJ . ndtl'l hlr
$6 h-t'f&Pfier?'lt*ll- gfrry,rt'{' ,i,e.} beu€vg5 }trats tl\(r'ta (rrs twog:P€n l€tte\tes
ie tt'telf dg,B€Plr1€trt Srssrc) n()Y \!t.*8il oN oA$r(\f.st\e 9(t)t€r\$ &viLc {{1F a '
olru \t jld tnava a;r{ q$crrti.'r,,
t !D I iQ 3t t9',2 '91)
(
t- lr.qe
SOlurn lo LlllRtlll tA?ERml
-.-_rsffrffi;Ei
PBOJECT:(:r.DATE
sl,i,E[#f,t'8#Bff
BRIEF DES-CRIPTOT.I OF'7|-IE PROPOSNL:Ecrrava.t,,;r, if 'd.i6,^,"a,
\T{tufe clr+,*.lo , 1/.il
a'dd l\!a+ {o g,rrrr,-e
.{arvlo,.,.tltn6 r
L,,,$en- - r )got ap,rorrr.r "e..tc!\
lmffiii:iT:,1.*,:,T;1,;-1Jxn;r-*y':",.;Ht;,:G;HU;",*
{tr6rr (*Y l vta
:'"::*fi" :*:*th o' ,{r w-r- r(r^\r (cI bq.} t ^ntJ{hr'r (vr\ ur,A\\o.n,rd.l,l I w.il1 ,,,,{r 4,}dO ftur,i t.*...rq\f+dl4crrtd gf * m ,
-
L4y.arr,dur .,r.r k l}. *U,.,...rr,* ,
['t"r,t o*rr.U .(:.?rrurt
|^ rtv.
It *.."r*,.-l;" E F Ftva /'tt ild orYq''.
A lu r n Ato,unA |\.rds ro [f: + t r
rgrB rirrc rrrrorrrx ,*,u., ".,.3,1)'"]:_,"
t-, lf ,rca,, |o Hr.,i...{ 2,0 r
' ll\9 c.\x1!! *a.n {..,:c pun )
:\jrr\.f 5,.Jr)
r.tu l|ltt
(AnOtoC) l-ll .ltr '
. ,, L
DATE SuBtr,ttm
PIIE oF PUBLTc trHEim"
OOMMEMT$ NEEDED BV:
BHIEF
c olnmonE:
Lrrt{c.n -
I ----r---DES€RIPTION OF TI{E FHOPOSAL:tsr,npv4'[,srr nf driver^]av\, d,dd hpart fu *{rr,r'
rr-^rtr're- l. - -,i' . , , Y',
\T(qt'urie clr+,*r,o , O47l larc/1*n a.ir'tur_,
u
rrrrr gruyi . icY. r tt+i', \rr Cr1:\Adr it- iurvoi -d
*11't-"'rt.a'\ YJrrErt'th '*r/ th(.\.-l rr'v\r nr.
{rrp,rr (-..r1rca . -'-''='l - ll r\c tzn rJtl sr,rn+Yt
"''u.O {rcr,n ord? 1,. n r
t}trtl)Snfgrq3lo"e1..q-er..-
a
fcAoroc) l.l? 'l tJ '
::-:l: *n :".:,. o,.,:
:n*
r rtrrc (rt loo* 1 nn u.r{a'r cvrr y,an \'ped.*llwr,rt" rJ,r{r- .qrt\i'C1 r\A,vrb l.e. .or.rrrr*.ffictrdo\ gt.. pg
,
1rtrcy'rrdtlr aylf l I k &, t\{ihrr.Lrr\ ,'$g.rl p,vpx*d .c,zr rru'lrE 'rr*.. ,.-,- tkB garra r u; /<Ir ir,{ orrq, -
Aiurn6qund rvalr fr b.- (rwttvi .^ ,._ - - . .
rgrB urrs rrrrrufizr ,-,":,:j:3.". I rn lha lo h, 1! rrcd', ra tvr,'r-.r., zb +19rld ufls trrtrufia). rndrvt o ot Cg lt\*i Llu{e''} *an {,*e €t*r )
rrra.y \rt.
,r{r lwt
rr.cratanrlvr&rEufi€epEn*ia?t7aoa
"l
EE{I€trrlr{tr
RTIWEEDI'€XN tlotznrdRE ,€rtu-]otot?"E
EETWEIE artLEE A fEltol,€/
/-
I
REn'JTZV}ENT,GICD **ar@%E DI'EUIU|OE vomDE*@ca EEe@gEtl
(-'
I
,I I
qr*,"/wE ttoEaEtwED,VAGNETTIYLqA,'DX DaDr{fEDVmror/g,tl gn€afE?r"',lf'H DA|Orrt'rf Etgftrfkirp
,/(\Nb t\\'"\' .ftDN,,,,LAND\
THE LODGE AT
,o(b
I
I
I
-W
IEWEEDOAA,EIJE
--{3rr
rl
,fu+x*l ,FnJil,o -J-E+.=
{
(
tl
II
ll
rl
d
4arr\\\\\
LIONSHEAT)CE'AYE EI'II6 Elnt
FE'T'/EE'AN*'@,,o'ETE'/TO
e I
!t
'
FILE C0r'i
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-21 3V479-2 1 39
FAX 970-479-24s2
Octobcr 30, 1996
Departnent of Connnunity Development
Mr. Ric Fields
Ficldscapc
P.O. Box ltlTl
Avon, CO 81657
Rc: Parking redcsisn for thc Lodgc at Lionshcad Phasc 3
Dear Mr. Ficlds:
Staff has conccptually approvc<I your dcsign submittal of Scptcmbcr I 9. t 996 for the rcmoval of
the parking structurc in front of thc Lodgc at Lionshcad and thc rcplaccmcnt rvith surfacc
parking. A variancc for parking in thc fiont sctback is not rcquircd as thc proposcd parking docs
not cncroach furthcr into front sctback and duc to thc rcduction in nonconformity ofparking on
thc s itc.
You nccd to submit your final construction plans and landscapc plan for final approval. Some
issucs rcgarding slopc along thc roadway nccd to bc discusscd with thc Public Works Dcpartmcnt
(Todd Oppcnhcimcr) bcfore final submittal.
Thank you for you paticncc in thc proccss.
If you havc any questions call mc at479-2148.
cc: Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works
t\.vcrronc\dom\l€n€rr\fi eldr.ol0
{g *'"""'o '*"'
APPROTJEDJUL 8
'
f$
PLANNING ANO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
July 8, 1996
Minutes
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Galen Aasland
STAFF PRESENT:
Susan Connelly
Mike Mollica
Dominic Mauriello
George Ruther
Judy Rodriguez
2:00 p.m.Public Hearlng
The meeting was called to order by Greg Moffet at 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a setback variance to allow for a snowmelt boiler to encroach 5.5 feet into a
sidey'ard setback. located at 2o4g sunburst Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley 4th Filing'
Applicant; Landon and Mary Hilliard, represented by Larry Eslwith
'Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overview of the request. He explained lhalJ_ay Peterson was here in
placJof Larry EsXwith to represent the Hilliards. He reminded the PEC that they voted
unanimously'at the June t Oth meeting to table this item until the Geologic Hazard Report could
be reviewed. On July 1, 1996, the report was submitted to the Town of Vail Community
Development Departinent, along with the revised site plan. Staff continues to recommend denial
based upon the Consideration olf Factors on pages 3 and 4 of the staff memo. Should the PEC
decide tb grant an approval of this request, staft would suggest that the approval carry with it the
conditions listed on page 5 ot the stafi memo.
Jay Peterson stated that he is here on behalf of the applicants and in place of Larry Eskwith'
Th'e applicant has looked at alternate sites and has come up with a good plan. Jay had nothing
further to add.
John Schofield still believes there are alternatives suitable for a solution to the location problem.
Gene Uselton had nothing to add to his comments from the last meeting.
Greg Amsden had no further comments.
Diane Golden said this item was a tough one. There are special circumstances with this request.
Jay Peterson stated the problems resulted because of a misunderstanding on the part of the
appticant.
Planning and Environmental Cornmission
Minutes
July 8, 1996
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Greg Moffet
Greg Amsden
Henry Pratt
Gene Uselton
Diane Golden
John Schofield
Henry Pratt agreed with Diane that there were special circumstances surrounding this request'
He would however, like one more screening tree and a V-shaped yll!-qs a condition for approval'
H""sreoifstaffneededtoverifythefinalscreeningorwou|dtheDRB?
Mike Mollica asked the pEC if more screening should be done with landscaping or with a wall'
Henry Pratt stated a tree is a better screen. The equipment cannot be visible as you come from
the golf course side of the Path.
Greg Moffet doesn't see this request any differently than at the last m.eeting' The applicant did
how-ever, spend a lot of money ielying oh the Town's go ahead' So therefore' he doesn't see
this as a grant ot special privilege because of the circumstances'
Henry Pratt made a motion for approval in accordance with the staff memo, noting for.the record
tnai this is not a grant of special'priveledge, because of the circumstances of the applicanl
i"r'ing on th" rdwn,s (pu6ic worxs oepirtmenr) information. He would like to add the lollowing
tw6 conditions to the three in the staff memo:
1. That at least one spruce tree' as approved by staff, be added'
2. That the new mitigation wall be designed and stamped by an engrneer'
The motion was seconded by Gene Uselton.
The motion passed by a Vote of 5.1, with John Schofie|d voting in opposition.
2. A request for a worksession to discuss parking and retaining wall height vailances.to
allow for the consiruction of a new parking area at the Lodge at Lionshead, Phase lll'
located at 380 East Lionshead circleiLot o, gtocx 2. Vail Lionshead, 2nd Filing'
Applicant: Lodge at Lionshead, represented by Ric Fields
Planner: Dominic Mauriello
Dominic Mauriello gave an overview of the worksession. He Stated that staff had concerns with
tne parf<ing. Statf ii not sure if it reduces the required amount of landscaping on the property'
sinie tne ipplicant nas not ptouiO.O a site plan of the entire site' Staff also was concerned
aOout it tottbiiling the Streetscape Master Pian and being compatible with adiacent uses in lhe
neighborhood.
Ric Fields, representing the applicant, said that they are improving the drainage situation' They
are making an attempt to tesien the grade and direct the water away from the retaining wall'
The owners want the carport to go aiay, as it is not attractive. They are aware that there are
issues about the enclosed parking. They feel the proposed plan solves the problem.
John Scholield asked if the drainage was a major concern'
Ric Fields, using renderings, explained the drainage'
John Schofield asked why all the drainage couldn't be drained off in one place under the existing
configuration.
Plannin g and Environmental Comnission
lvl inutes
JulY 8. 1996
Ric Fields explained that one side is substantially lower than the other.
Dominic Mauriello said the Town is putting in a curb and doing some work to improve the
drainage along this roadwaY.
Ric Fields said this plan works with the Town's proposed Streetscape Plan'
cene Usetton asked il he 5-112' height of the wall is acceptable. The Zoning Code limits it to 3"
because of obstruction to traffic.
Ric Fields said the only place we are raising it above 3' is along the sign wall.
Gene Uselton asked how far from the property line would the parking variance on the east side
be.
Ric Fields said 6'-7'.
Gene Uselton stated that it might be enough to plant trees there. lt would look like the other
buildings to the'west.
Greg Moffet reminded everyone that this was a v\rorksession and invited the public to feel lree to
participate.
Greg Amsden asked if the drainage is the main concern, why doesn't the Association change
the drainage plan. Greg feels theie is a lot of hard surface, regardless of what you do with the
landscapin-g. Why not i-mproue the existing situation. Greg feels there is excessive hard surface.
Ric Fields said even though there is more asphalt, landscaping breaks it up. Ric said there is a
tremendous amount of buffer now, which improves the situation'
Diane Golden agrees with Greg Amsden that there is more hard surface with no gain in parking'
She stated she Eould understand the proposal for more asphalt if there were additional parking
spaces being provided, but there were not. There is not much aesthetic gain.
Ric Fields said there were limitatations with the underground parking and that we are working
within the parameters.
Henry Pratt asked if anyone has successlully used grass blocks. He is less worried about tratfic
damage, then he is about snow Plows'
Ric Fields said the sod doesn't stay put on grass blocks.
Henry Pratt said he feels it is too close to the main street, but it seems to be consistent with the
neigtiOors. Henry asked about the east end where lhere is 5-1/2 ' ol planting on the-inside of the
wail-. He asked why you can't move the planting to the outside of the wall and therefore, move
the wall further lrom the street.
Dominic explained that the drawing being presented by the applicant is in fact different than the
proposed plan. The proposed plan has less green buffer along the frontage.
Planning and Environmental Commrssion
July 8, 1996 3
Henry Pran, in reference to the 5-1i2 ' retaining wall, suggested putting- a .b9rm along the
,ii#siOJ. He said to gef rid ot the island andlover alllhe parking with this berm. This would
allow the applicant to meet the screened parking requirement a1d give you something to look.at
tom tne stidetsiOe. He gave the Athletic btuO ai an example. There would be no view from the
OuifOi-ng sidJ.but that is?rot his concern. Henry suggested the applicant look at this option.
Ric Fields asked the PEC if the applicant did this, would the request be looked at more
favorably?
The Commission unanimously said yes.
Greg Moffet reminded the applicant rhat if they are going t9 sgti,sjllhqggmmission' they need to
piovt i naraship showing tndt tfris is not a grint of special privileg.e. lf th.e applic-ant uses
.
L"nw'i suggesiion, they"couh add parking-spaces and decrease the variance' Right now I s-ee
-
iie#ovaL6iranoscapin'g, i; i"crea;, in aiphatt, without additional parking and being within 3' of
the right-of-way.
Greg Amsden said he doesn't mind the parking being side-by-side spaces' He does however'
rani to see a reduction in asphalt. He also wants it all to be screened from the street.
Ric Fields asked if joining the 4 spaces would be befter'
Henry Pratt said it wouldn't get his approval. Jusl doing that will notr be enough to.get this
ieqr,is tfiougn all the varia"nce criteria. He reminded the applicant that they need a bigger
gesture.
Greg Moftet said the drainage presents a hardship, but not to the level of asking for 3 separate
variances.
John Schofield asked it the height of the wall would need a railing in the future'
Ric Fields said that no railing would be necessary if there was substantial landscaping' but he
would have to further research that issue.
John Schofield said at some point, with a sidewalk, a railing might be necessary'
Henry pratt said Ric Fields is right. A railing is not a requirement if there is substantial
landscaping.
Greg Moffet asked it the Lodge at Lionshead Manager had anything to add' He did not'
3. A request for front and side selback variances to allow lor a residential addition to the
Mesdenbaugh residence, located at 970 Fairway CourVLot 5, Vail Village 1Oth Filing.
Applicant: Robert and Hildegard Messenbaugh, represented by Mike Guida
Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther gave an overview of the request. Code allows decks to encroach up to s'.into the
side setback, but the apiticant ls proposing' an encroachment of '14" Staff is recommending
Planning and Environmenlal Comrnission
Minutes
JulY 8' '1996
approval, referencing the PEC's decision lor approval in 1975. George stated that the same
riil"tio"r eiist toOayl Staft however, thinks thi'applicant.should reconfigure the new stain'vay'
Staff woutd like an additional condition that the exierior lighting and building siding be brought up
to code.
Greg Moffet asked lor any public comment.
Frank McKibben, representing Dr. Philip sheridan and Dr' James Bowen, adiacent ploperty
owners of the applicant, itate? there were three basic concerns. Most ot lhe houses constructed
on the north side of m" "ir""t
encroach into the front setback. This presents a problem in.the.
winter with parking r"6.'fnii prJsenis a very urban looking street. lt all comes back to allowing
Jeul-foprentin fh"e front s"tUa&. He said t-ot g is an example of development happening
*itf'orf
"n"toaching
into itte ttont setback. The property v€lues are.a lot higher now and any
Oeuetopment must 6e tooiieO
"t
u"ty closely. .f rinf sUied that coming towards the street is not
the answer. This won't i;trda the parkin{ situation. From the side you get the feeling of a.row
of townhomes. ge teers iiiaigris iJ i pooriolution. I find the design criteria hard to follow' He
stated that just because something occurred in the past' is not enough reason to go foruard'
Mike Guida, representing the applicant, said the front yard setback doesn't increase parking.
Greg Moffet asked the Commissioners for their comments'
Diane Golden had no comments.
Henry Pratt appreciated Frank's comments. Because there iS no impact on the ground level,
Henry had no problem with the side setback variance.
Greg Amsden asked it the applicant is planning on using T-111 siding'
George Ruther said yes. lt must be removed and real wood siding used.
Greg Amsden agrees with Henry and has no problem with the GRFA extensions' He does have
a oroblem with the stairway on the west side.
Mike Guida said the stairs are to access lhe second level deck. They could put a masonry wall
leading up to the deck.
Gene Uselton had no further comments'
John Schofield does not support the stairs. He also agrees on the T-111 siding issue'
George Rurher said sraft added lhe additional condition to bring tfe 9{gr_ol building materials
and t'ignting up to code since they are adding more than 150 sq. ft. of GRFA to the structure'
UnOeicnafiter 1 8.54 in ine oesidn Guidelinds, and per staff policy, when adding more than 150
sq. ft. of Gif fR to a structure, the building must be brought up to code'
Henry pratt asked if we can impose bringing the. building up to compliance for both sides of the
struciure. lf the neighbor says no, you are denying them their property rights.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
July 8, 1996
Greg Moffet asked staff, regarding the siding issue, where it is lound in the code to bring the
entire building uP to comPliance.
Mike Mollica said in Chapter 18.54.050, plywood siding is not permitted' Additionally, slaff .
OritteO a policy tor cnanging out siding, ioi the undergiounding of utilities'.etc' Any expansion
;";;1!0 5q. tt. in rir" *iiiinistiinginb the bu.ilding into comflianc":..1.9rp1"I lot is considered
on" fot,li iar as the Zoning Code. Tt ii up to the aFplicant to work with his neighbor' In some
situations, the neighbor can be a big stumbling block'
Greg Moffet asked if this has been in place tor a long time'
Gene Uselton said we only discovered this provision today'
Mike Mollica said it would be rare that the PEC would get involved with this' This is generally a
DRB issue.
Mike Guida asked what would happen if the applicant goes for solid wood siding and the
neighbor doesn't want to do this.
George Ruther said the entire structure would need to come into compliance.
Mike Mollica said that both halves must be brought into compliance, or there will be no issuance
of a building Permit.
Mike Guida said il we comply with the regulations, I don't see why we won't be allowed to do this'
Greg Amsden gave the example of how the applicant is subject to the party wall agreement'
Mike Guida said we just found out 10 minutes ago that this was the case and we haven't had a
chance to address this issue.
Henry pratt made a motion for approval in accordance with the statfs findings' with the additional
recorirmendation that the side siair not be allowed as proposed'
Greg Amsden seconded the motion.
Henry Pratt amended his motion with the 4 conditions as proposed by staff and no additional
conditions.
The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
4. A request for worksession to discuss a conditional use permit for a proposed addition to
tne Vail Chapel, located at 19 Vail Road/Tract J, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing'
Applicant:
Planner:
Vail Religious Foundation, represented by Ned Gwathmey
Dominic Mauriello
Henry Pratt excused himself from this item, as his office is submitting a bid on this project'
Plarming and Environmental Commission
Minutes
JulY 8. | 996
Dominic Mauriello gave an overview of this worksession and Stated that Ned Gwathmey'
Lutheran Minister Rev. Walker and Rod Slifer were all present'
Greg Moffet asked for public input.
Ned Gwathmey explained that they are looking atthe Chapel from a. ph.ysical side to make it
pia"ti"iirr ttr6 neit zO yeari ano'to also brin! it into compliance with the new code issues, ADA
lnO iighting. They have'been directed not to dlscuss changing the appealance' Their plan-
inuoruE"i"iing th6 existing offices out of the basement. Parking has not been a problem. The
.
Oanf. piiO ior [arking with-ttre agreement that the church would use it on weekends and the bank
OJrinj tne *ebX. WE can't lower the building, because ot the 100-yr. lloodplain' We need to
hear the major concerns from the PEC. We still have to raise the money to meet the needs. We
are therefore testing the waters with the PEC.
Rev. Walker stated that 6 congregations are using the chapel and all cong.regationr are growing.
It is a very heavily used tacility and we see the continuance ol being heavily used' The usage
has been spiritual in nature and tfre faditional look will be kept. He also mentioned that there are
four offices downstairs.
John Schofield sees no problem with the request.
Gene Uselton is impressed with the proposed addition. He suggested making the drive come
under the building to miss the 100-yr. floodplain.
Greg Amsden said he wanted to look into the GU Zone District for assurance that if the church
cami into hard times, the use could not be converted to commercial use. He stated that he is
supportive of this aPPlication.
Diane Golden also supports the application. She asked if the offices in the existing chapel would
be eliminated.
Rev. Walker said yes, the otfices would be eliminated.
Greg Moffet agreed that more room was needed. lt is a great asset to community. He didn't
see any significant problems with the request-
Rod Slifer stated that there are two components of the fund raising. There is endowment money
to make improvements. Endowments ensure that the chapel will be maintained in the future'
which answers the "hard times" in the future issue.
Diane Golden asked if they had determined the cost of the project yet.
Rod Sliter said it would cost apploximately $1-112 million in rounded numbers.
Ned Gwathmey mentioned thal a memorial aspect was being considered for the grounds._lt.will
be a beautiful irea. A walkway was suggesteb with a small place for memorial plaques. This is
not the intent with this application, but iihas been felt by some of the members that this could be
an assel. lf it happens,'ii could be beautiful and only for ashes. A low wall with plaques was
suggested for the memorial.
Planning and Environmental Cornmrssron
Minutes
JulY 8, 1996
Diane Golden asked how many souls could be accommodated'
Rev. Walker said that this is not a new idea. There are 25-30 such memorials in Denver-
Gene Uselton asked if this would be a part of the fund raising plan'
Ned Gwathmey said Yes.
John Schofield said all things are possible, when they are done well'
Gene Uselton gave his approval of the idea'
Greg Amsden had no objections.
Diane Golden had no objections.
Greg Mofiet agreed with John, as long as it is well designed, but he did mention that there would
be s-ome political aspects to address regarding the memorial'
5. A request for a conceptual discussion of Lionshead redevelopment.
Applicant: Vail Associates, represented by Dave Corbin
Planner: Susan ConnetlY
Susan Connelly introduced Dave Corbin to present the conceptual discussion'
Comments trom the PEC members followed-
John Schofield likes what he sees. He strongly encouraged using Gore Creek as an amenity to
iti O".t advantage. His biggest concern is fr-e-existing buildings that remain. He would like to
*""
"ncouragerient
tor alio-t Lionshead to follow VA's lead for upgrading' This proposal is
Oetiniteiy goiig in the right direction. He encouraged staff to be flexible in order to bring about
the process.
Gene Uselton agreed fhat it is very attractive. He questioned the compatibility about what exists
there now, with what will be changed over time.
Dave Corbin said they are looking at a 5 yr. time frame. The minimum would be 18 months to go
through the approval process anJ t g months to go through the building process. The time frame
needi to Oe rbhtistic ih order to do it in such a way that it would notinterlere with ski seasons.
tolncent other buildings to enhance their properties, is the most difficult part of this project. One
of the topics of our study is to meet with Jdff Winston regarding the Co.urcheval incentive
progor. We feel we aie on a path towards. a better woiking relationshiq with the Town and
iogitn"t we could find reasons'for surrounding properties to conform'. We have to find a design
that will mesh, as surrounding properties choSe to bnange. Can tacade treatments be done with
iinancing mec'hanisms tnat w-outC
'encourage other properties to do the same is a question.we
ire iskiig. Perhaps lree market density c6anges wouid be an incentive for properties to change'
We neeOio give ni.ritOinis i ne* set of iesign-guidelines, so that they might do it on their own'
The Associations involved are financially able to do it'
Planning and Envkonmental Commission
Minutes
JulY 8' 1996
Bob Lazier gave an example of the Lifthouse Lodge-as being constructed of pre-stressed
concrete wlir'ch lends itself to this redevelopment. Condo Associations arc eaget to pick up
property values. The incentives are there. We need staff agreeing that they will not put up
iuiertiiiat blockades; such as the Fire Dept. says one thing and the Electrical Inspector says
another.
Dave from Design Workshop said that the fabric of Lionshead will change. The opportunity is
there lo give everyone something.
Gene Uselton agrees that he would like to see economic incentives. He agrees with Bob Lazier
that a spirit of cooperation is needed with the Town.
Greg Amsden is supportive of the ideas expressed. lt seems though that the pedestrian
distince, with the new parking structure, is increased. He feels that the North Day Lot housing
offices and employee housinj'is not its best use. He thinks VA should use the Holy Cross site
for offices and em'ployee houiing. He asked if there will be retail in the Sunbird with condos
above.
Dave Corbin said they are thinking about an interval time-share producl above the retail in the
Sunbird Lodge. This will add a mix of lodging enterprises in Lionshead.
Greg Amsden would like to look at a new zone district, such as a special development zone
Oistiict for the redevelopment of Lionshead. Incentives are needed to encourage any low-end
buildings riding on the tail of a high-end neighborhood'
Diane Golden said it is a wonderful idea for Lionshead. She pointed out that the parking
struclure is being viewed for additional ice surfaces.
Dave Corbin mentioned that the east end of the structure is being looked at for ice by Phil
Hoversten.
Henry Pratt said Gore Creek is an important asset to tie us back to the earth. The North Day
Lot's-best use is not for offices and employee housing. He reminded everyone that when you cut
otf the sun with large buildings, you will replace the sun with wind tunnels. lf there is any way to
have this completed by the '99 Championships; that would be great.
Dave Corbin said it will be in progress during the Championships, but not done. The North Day
Lot has blocked views in troni, witn highway noise in the back. A condo project would not be well
received as a saleable product, since it would be without a view and burdened with highway
noise. The North Day Lot would make the most sense operationally by keeping an employee
group close to the core.
Greg Amsden would like to see a greater skier drop-off in that vicinity.
Henry Pratt mentioned that the development rights could be traded for public use where
additional development rights could be an asset. ls an ice rink appropriate at the end of the
structure. He sees the applicant trying to create a great plaza.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
July 8, 1996
Greg Motfet doesn't see an impediment having the development stretch from Dobson to the Holy
Cross shops.
susan connelly said Larry Grafel thought the redevelopment study area should extend west to
Cascade.
Kit Williams said pedestrian traffic across l-70 needs to be addressed'
Dave corbin said they hadn't thought of the increased demand on the pedestrian bridge' This is
"
uatiO i.tu" il it's beihg maximized now, it does need to be looked at'
Bob Lazier said that the Enzian and Vail Glo Lodges need pedestrian help'
Dave Corbin said north across the highway is a new problem'
susan connelly said she heard that Red sandstone school might be lor sale.
John schofield said the Timber Ridge to cascade area might need a study'
6. A request for an exterior addition utilizing the 250 ordinance, located at 781 Potato
PatchiLot 21, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Sissel and Richard Pomboy .Pianner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL JULY 22'1996
7. A request for a conditional use permit, a density variance and-front setback variance to
alow lor a Type tt iftU a5ou" the existing garage, located at 227 Rockledge Road/Lot
13A, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Steve KirbY
Pianner: Dominic Mauriello
WlTHDRAWN
ilil//ilt//
Greg Amsden made a motion to table item 6'
The motion was seconded by Gene Uselton.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0
8. lnformation Update
. Request for endorsement of Vail Tomorrow
Planning and Environmental Cornmission
Minutes
JulY 8, 1996 L0
susan connelly introduced chris Motfet and Robin Litt as part of the coordinating team putting
together Vail Tomorrow.
Chris Moffet asked the PEG for its support ot Vail Tomorrow. The project now has about 20
p"opf" to initiate and get it going in the Community' .fhey a19 tog,finOjo-r-input from as many
community members as poisiOti. They will be reiching out to all members of community to get
inlut from'titeratty everydne with what ihey tant Vail to look like in the future and how we can
make that happen. ft'.
"
uiw
".1on
oti"rit"O proiect. They plan on coming up with specific
.
"Jion
pr"nr.'-fo" would tike io ask the pEc to say yes tnai you will support this organization by
your participation in tocus gr.i,Jt, 6f source otiniormation and that you will se1ously consider
iny dt tne outcomes that come as a result of this process'
Robin Litt had nothing to add.
chris Moffet said she would like to have a PEc endorsement today.
Susan Connelly stated that so far she has received support from every organization in Town and
will finish contdcting organizations within the next month'
Chris Moffet again said we need the PEC endorsement so we can be assured the outcomes will
be seriously considered.
Susan Connelly said the community is deciding on a vision with implementation ol that vision.
Sn"?roliio that Levi Sinoriero, a member oitne nign school, was to be present today' but
something came up and he was unable to be here.
Greg Amsden asked how can we support this proiect without knowing what the outcome will be?
Chris Moffet said this is a valid question. Of course you can't endorse every outcome' Th-ere are
Jome gtornd iules. tt it goes ag'ainsf your mission, you have no obligation to support it' We just
ask that you support the outcomes if you can.
Susan Connelly said part of the process is a cost benefit analysis or financial feasibility. The
iommunity will'be involved with ihe feasibility, so there is accountability involved and will happen
by educating each other. The process is a product'
Diane Golden asked il this will be a lunded group.
Chris Moffet said there will be fundraising. The TOV has committed funds, along with VA'
susan connelty said the TOV has given $50,000.00 seed money and the Vail valley Foundation
has endorsed tne program rith a c"ontribution of $5,000.00. She reiterated that it is not a Town
program.
Gene Uselton asked a question regarding the flow charts. Are we at the tirst step on the flow
chart.
Susan Connelly advised the PEC, that we are not using the flow chart in the handout. She stated
that the
'low
chart listed is old.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
JulY 8, 1996 11-
chris Moffet said starting July 19th we will be rolling it out to the community' The first Vail
Tomorrow meeting witl be July 22nd'
susan connelly said there will be 10 focus groups or cornmunity round tables' we will be
accommodatin! as many people as want to be involved'
Greg Amsden made a motion to sign a statement saying the PEC will endorse Vail Tomorrow'
Gene Uselton seconded the motion'
It passed unanimously by a vote ol 6-0'
9. Approval of June 24, 1996 minutes
Gene Uselton made a motion {or approval of the June 24' 1996 rninutes'
John Schofield seconded the molion.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0.
Greg Amsden made a motion to adjourn the meeting'
The motion was seconded by Gene Uselton.
It passed unanimously by a vote of 6-0'
The meeting adjourned at 5:30 P.m.
Planning and Environmental Commission
Minutes
JulY E' 1996
'J,2
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
revised MEMO
Lodge at Lionshead Phase III File
Dominic Mauriello, Planner
June24,1996
Existing Conditions Lodge at Lionshead Phase III
This memo is intended to clarifu some existing site conditions'
Zonng:
Lot size:
Units:
GRFA:
The lot is zoned HDMF (29o/o) and MDMF (71%).
0.9822 acres or 42,784.632 sq. ft..
12 units on site
The density and GRFA for the site is determined by applyrng the density provisions
for each zoning and then adding the two.
HDMF (29o/, of lot)
12,407.543 sq. ft. of HDMF area X 6O sq. ft. of GRFA/ 100 sq. ft. of lotarea= 7,444.53 sq. ft. of GRFA
MDMF (7lo/o of lot)
30,372.089 sq. ft. of MDMF area X 35 sq. ft. of GRFA/100 sq. ft. of lot arca = 10,631.981 sq. ft. of GRFA
Total GRFA allowed = 18,076.51 sq. ft.
Existing CRFA = 20,,043 sq. ft.
This calculation does not include any common area above the 35% credit (6,326'78 sq. ft.)
allowed. (According to JeffBailey, Manager of the Lodge at Lionshead, 5 units are 1,651
sq. ft., 3 units are t,s+o sq. ft., 2 units are 1,569 sq. ft., unit I I is 1,944 sq. ft., and unit 12
is 2,068 sq. ft.)
Density: 19 units allowable
Parking: Existing = 18 spaces (12 underground, 3 in carport, and 3 surface)
Required - 25 sPaces (19 enclosed)
f: \dominic\wpfi les\memos\lodge3.wpd
tsign Review Action r?t
TOWN OF VAIL
category Number \i i; \i,, -t5
Date
Project Name: i
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner. Address and Phone:
ArchitecVContact, Address and Phone:
-r . ' I '
Legal Description: Lot t' Block \ Subdivision , i ' - Zone District
Project Street Address:
Comments:
Motion by:
Boafdl Staff Action
Vote:
Seconded by:
D Approval
! Disapproval
.1! Staff Approval
Conditions:
Town Planner
Date:DRB Fee Pre-paid
rawiaoal e/L7/e1
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPIJICATION . TOIIN VAfIJ, COIJORADO
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
t**!r******
INCOMPTJETE APPI.ICATIONS MAY NOT BE SCEEDWED FOR REVIEW.
***!r*a!aat*
I.
A.DESCRIPTION:Q)a rL5
C*+<c
{fr9-1-
ta+t t,t/is'i-.'
B. TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Const,ruction ($200. OOI K rqinor AlteraEion ($20. OO)Addition ($50.00)Conceptual neview ($0)
o
OF
ADDRESS 36O . Lto,*s Cruc-u t617
t87
T\
E.
IJEGAIJ DESCRI
Subdivision
If property
descript.ion,to this appl
ZONING:
ION: Lot .-frTL
is described by please provide
ication.
Block
a meets and bounds on a separate sheet
legal
and aEtach
NAME
Mail
OF
ing
lu
NAME OF
Mailing
La.
H. NAME OF OWNER(S) :
APPLICA]T]T:to/vj
Address:ct7
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:
Address:5
Phone +1 6 - 21@
Phone
/)t
I.
J.
OWNER(S) SIGNATT]RE:Ast.r(i-
Ma.iling Address:
Phone
APPLICATIONS WII.IJ NOT BE PROCESSED IIITEOW OWNER'S SIGTiIArURE
Condomini-um Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at the t.ime of submittal of t.he DRB application. LaEer, when applying for a building permit, please identify the accurat,e valuaLion of the proposal . The Town of Vail wiII adjust Lhe fee according to the table be1ow, to ensure t,he correct fee is paid.
t f',r l ('l
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
$ 0 $ 10,000
A .l ^ ^.r.t a F^ ^^^+ J.u, vvJ. - ip JU, UUU
$ 50,00L - $ 150,000
$l_50, 001 $ s00, 000
$500, 001 - $1, 000, 000 $ Over $1, 000, 000
DESIGN REVTEW BOARD APPROVAIJ EXPIRES
APPROVAIJ UNLESS A BUTLDTNG PERMTT TS IS STARTED.
ONE YE.AR AFTER FTNAIJ
TSSUED AI\TD CONSTRUCTION
>t
/I.'-tt, -
@-t"
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
o o
LODGE AT
LIONSHEAD
PROPOSED EXTERIOR
COLOR SCHEME
RArLrnre I
€tt? rDdtrr
Srar?5
A\n"
STUCCO
STUCCO FIELD
ACCENT FASCIA &TRIM A'ff Florrf
Fcrrr:S
t.'.D t jl Ar -, Or:n:--\
i)-r,^......"< E EX IST ING EX AMPL E
o
"-rdtl, d;{ ?/t3
d$'rfiT*'.
tfr'.*1'{ &rf
drJrrt? Y-r*&qi
I d-n r{,r 'l'tl t
a
4.1184 US HrcHwAy 6 . PO Box 1624 . AvoN, CO 81620
303/9.19-3302 . 303/949-5121 F,rr
LODGE AT LIONSHEAD, PIIASE M
BUILDING REPAIR & PAINTTNG
ON SITE MEETING TO CONFIRM COLOR SUGGESTIONS
AfiENDEES; JEFFBAILBY&TMKEHOE
May 8, 1995
SUGGESTED EXTERIOR PAINT COI.ORS
( Clarification of Color Rendering '8" )
NORTIIELEVATION
l) Wood Windows
Privacy Fenco aod Proposed Cap
Dmrs
Cirorlar Emergency etairs & Proposed Cap
2,) ArcdizodMaalC'p
3.) Circular Stairs - Stcel Rril & Pickets
Stool Cohmn & Tresds
EASTELEVATION
1.) Stairs - lilood eiling at rail & Proposed Cap
C€oter Divlling Wsll at Stairs
2.) Maal Pipo Raib at Balcony
Anodized MAat Cap at Balcony
3-) 16' diam. Concrcto Columns
4.) Doors & Windows
WESTELEVAIION
1.) Garago Door
Lockers
Vertical Dividing Wall h Stairs 2.) Steirs - Wood Siding at Rail ad Proposed Cap 3.) Aaodized Meral Cap
SOUTH ELEVATION
l.) Concrete Colurnns
Wixlows "') Doors
Caps at I-ow Site Walls
Timbers at Sandstone Pavers 2.) Metal Pipe Balcony Rails
3.) Anodizd Mefrl Capo at Balcony
POOL AREA
l.) Rails & Caps
NOTE: Seal Existing Balcony Decks and Painr
CRAY/ TAIJPE
NOCHANGE
GREBN
GRAY/ TATJPE
GREEN
GRAY/ TAI'PE
GREEN
NOCIIANGE
GRAY/ TAIJPE
GRAY/TAUPE
GRAY/TAI'PE
GREEN
NO CIIANGE
GRAY / TAUPE
6REEN
NO CHANGE
GREEN
GRAY / TAUPE
o o
TOWN ()t'VAIL
rlr: r
^
RTM ri,IjjrSrtoafirt uN r'r'v rrr;vlir.of DrENr
A4-2./-4"-N^M$./:(-
AlrDR-Ess-
?ROJf,CT
ctrF,cKs tltADr, pAvAtl,B't o'll)lvN ()rYAll,
o 0000 4 540 7-ONINC AND N I)DI(IiSS MAI'S $5.00
0 0000 424 5 U NIF'ORMI}UI LDiN(; CODIi ti54.oo
0 oooo 424 5
_UNIFORNIPL
UN'II I NE C5 D I J $39.0O
0 0000 424 UNIFOI{M M IiCI INNICAL CODIi,$17.00
0 0000 424 uN|lOrtM tjllU; coDIi $J6.01)
0 0000 424 NATIONA L liLlrCTl{lCAl, CODI $17.00
o 0000 424 OTttl:lR CO|Jli U(X)KS
0 0000 4 548 l'tuIiTI{INTS i MYLARS)$7.00
0 0000 424 2 XIiROX COPII'S $0.25
0 0000 424 t2 S'IU DIIiS
0 0000 424 2 TOVI'-ltlrS COMPUTIiR PI{OCRn M $5.00
0 0000 42371 PliNn LTY I;liUS / Rli-INSI'IiCTIONS
0 0000 4 r332 PLAN RliVlliW l{l'l-CllliCK Flil': IS40 Plrl{ IlR.l
0 0000 421t2 OFIJ IIOUILS INSPI,CITION l;lilrS
0 0000 4 4 2 CONTR^CTOII.S l-lCliNsliS I"l;I]S
0 0000 4 4 -t Sl(iN APPLICATTON t"11U $i20.00
0 00004t413 TDDlTitlN LSICN eiti;lrli [$ |.0(t Plr.l{ sQ lil'.]
0 0000,!2440-'TC ART PI{OJIJCT DONA'I'ION
0 0({L4l33 l trI.PN ID DI;SI(;N ITIiVIIiW I}OAI(D I;I:I:I k z1)
0 00ooTznT INVtiSTIGnTION l. l..lt ( llul r.DrN(;)
J 0000 45 |0 IOV PN ITKINC FUNT)
0 0000 22027 TOV NI,:WSPA t'I1R DISPIJNSI'R I'U NI)I 0t 0000 2l t2 T XABIEIr) 4'l" GsTA'l'lt)* 0t 0000 4t010 TA,\-ABLfinr 4% ('fOwN)
0 0000 4237 |IUILDIN(; I NVIJSTICATION
)1'tililt
0 0000 4 330 ADDtTIONn L (;Rl.A "2s0 $200.00
0 0000 4 130 coNi)lnoNAL usI l,lil{MIT $200.00
0 0000 4 330 ljxTltl{lOR ALl'l,l{A'l'lON ILl:SS 'flln N l(x) SQ.l''l .J t;200.00
o 0000 4 330 lixTt.)l{loll n LTliltATloN IMol{li TIIAN 100 SQ.FT.]$500.o0
0 0000 4 310 SPIjCIn L DUVIiLOPMIiNT l)lS'rRIC-r INI:w]$l
0 0000 4 310 SPITCIAL DliVliLOPMliN'l' DlSl'Rlcl' IMAJOI{ AMItNLT $ I .000.u1
0 0000 4 tJ0 SPI;CInL Dl:Vl:LOPMIjNT DISl'l(lCT IMINOR nMIrND]$200.00
o 0000 4 tl0 SUBDIVISMT
0 0000 4 330 VARIN NCU $250.00
0 0000 4 330 ZONIN(} CODI] N MIiNDMIJNTS $250.00
0 0000 4 330 RIi. ZONINC $200.00
o1'r iltR
OTill;rt
ITOTAL:
\"Y
RDC. DY: 'J mLr.r.or-r
o o
Project Application
Oate 8l? /FQ
Prolect Name: L0D(;E AT EIUl.iStiEii! ir;i^tjil I I I q Iilil
Or^;6^f nAc^ri^ti^n'
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date .r-
' (i-4 . L.Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
,)
DISAPPROVAL
Su mmary:
Plan ne r E Statt Approval
,l-/r 7
7+'
I t't 't lov
-r*'b-u- ( I
'rtt )-u( {2 e17t<c44n--,
.//
-L.c, tc6-.
/-4 -"t v
The Lodge
af [ion5Head lll
360 east lionshead circle
J .- tat ' '.t.
't'ttl lu llal
75 south lronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-701',t0
April 17, '1984
T0: SIGN APPLICANTS
FR0M: Tom Braun or Kristan Pritz, Planners
RE: Sign Appl ication Requirernents
Hhen applications for signs are submitted, the follorving is requ'i red:
ofllce of communlty developmenl
i nformati on
be located.
sign is to be located.
l.
2
Site plan sholing exact 'location where the sign is to
Photograph or drawing sholing the building and where
Exact design of sign (one or more of the following)
(a) scale drawing or rendering (must be colored exactly
(b) the sign itstrl f is made
(c) photograph if sign is made
FEE: A $20.00 application fee will be required at time of appiication.
as sign will be)
a.
lli
(over )
\
' : r't t..'
I -f '' "7,
Appl ication Nunber
Fee Paid
SIGN APPLICATION
Name of Project fl{E LoDcrL Ar LiOI{SHEADJ
Name of Person Subrnitting phone 47
Description of .Project Pe-r vAT.E =or.ip!-,S
l'|//.u-'-/
ta'L1og
The f o'l 'lorvi ng i nformation i s requi red f or to the Design Review Board before a final Sign submittal fee is $20.00.
submittal 'by the applicant
approval can be given.
A. Sign Material
C€Ctr.)oo D r STAc-raED' .l uAM rIJA]-LD
B. Description of Sign
N/ ADr)SS
C. Size of Sign
Length of
Cgrnrnents
'ru Lo-a<a_
MAT.ERIALS SUBiIITTED WITH,APPLICATION
Site Plan
Orar.ri ngs . shiilTng?act 'locati on
Photographs shorving proposed locaffi-
Actual sign _
€oilored scale draling _
F-+< t7 Photograph of sign
I
2
Approved for DRB Submittal
Diiapproved for ORB Submitta1l]
/,'aa-: r{A A//
fi,s
"/€z--L St
,/;.-aC
=/ / t'
/l--xana/Q
/
town n
75 soulh fronlage ral.
vail, colorado 81657
(303) il76-7000
||flI
February 15, 1992
This is to certify that the attached is the official certificate of occupancy the the Lodge at Lionshead, phase III
2--
department of commun ity development
Notay'y Public
My Commission expires October 31, 19a2.
llal
vail, colorado 81557
(3031 476-5613
July 8, 1981
Jim Meehan
380 E. Lionshead Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Jim:
At the July 1 meeting of the Des'ign
for modification of existing disp'l ay
of Vail was given final aPProval as
department of community development
RE: DRB Submittal ot 7/l/8L
Review Board,
area at the
presented.
your submittal
Fjnishing Touch
Peter Jamar
Town Pl anner
PJ:df
.$
F
=ul
rJ,/
IE
gJ
z
F (J
F 7
trJ z
Irl
f
z
Ll
CH
1Z
az ZA <;
laz q=x9
t,{
t'l <
<t
F.
IJJ
z
s
F z q,
E ul
ul
tr
CE
u,t
J
t'|.
lu
G
F
J
J
<(
F o F
UJ
J
tt
a
o F
L
$a
N
p
il
K h
u
x
E i i
E
!
.E
=|T
=E 0.
l&oO
=,2
=q l-l f
o
.J
\
ul
=x
LIJ
z
F
rl.lt
z
J
F v,
u.
F
lLt o
z
t!J a
o u,
IIJ tt v
uJ I (,
z
J
ul
z
F
z
IJJ F z
J
llJ v,
F
z
ut
J
ut
uJ
C)
t!
ut F
=
F t!
z
F
ul
o
ul
u-
6
ut A o
ut I Y 2
E
uJ E
ul
E o z
F tn
G o
z o
F
A
o
2 o
F
!r Q
(J z
A
J
tt
F
IIJ
q
z
z
z
-t
z
z
F
o
lt o
IJJ F
!c
J
=
z
J
E
Y
.J
@
III C
!f rr
=@
t-t <
z o
F 9q n6 FC t4(,x>
:z 6f
ul)o- (J >o
-ni
Y
G.o\
=
z
tr
E
u,o
v,rf
\
ul
o
J
u,
o o
a
=
I
?-
-a l
v
Y
rll
z
J
2
Eo kg ()L
I3 o.(J
ur
()z
8:qF.
N-w s +
F z
|i|2
'
Li
F
2
3H:E*$:ir;
- k Q,'9
< :. y z F
=FF<u)Fiq.-F
EbHIi 5 no9Ig : z - <3 ;<oza
iF:Ei a<O <OIr)2;rFii:3?6'?
H=958 IF,<c O> -o SBE?c<'J
+
E
E
cr ul
uJ
z
-<
tr
{
llJ
ac
o
l!
ut
F
F
F
G
)
tr.
J
F
F
F z
u,l 5 u,
l-q
It.
{.Ir J
"{${\L
tr
ul
0,
Lr-c)o
-:€,
-.
=tt G;' I
f
ul
i)f..
l,r
L: ,lir
!:i.J \\/
,$-
I!r"\r 1f-
)<
t t t
-l
-4.
Y
3
o z
9
g
IJ
|rI
J
gl z
o9
-o t Ye< 6
!- |2-
9
9*
FE 9o =>:z :<
A(J >(J FO ; .',
o.
\(, .'t
o o
zl,7{
a5,50_
5;L,zi t
I
t
t
I
I
I
I L-
RECOnD OF lEi,EPHOllE CoNvEIlsATroN
tl SHEET I OF I
DRtn:--tz-rs-i; -
TIME: li3o
FROi'i:
NAl,iE: D<r'..-,u-
-Rn .-*,.r 8 o
COMPANY: Getr.rrut=uu F e- ParTFc-Trc\l v(J
TO:
;\
IIAME: M'.t. Ht.,- t/l recE
-
CoMPANY: LtrY 0F yAru - sLoc-ffi
SUBJECT: Luorte Ar Lto^"tt'=,oo Ptrns e lf\--
TOPICS OF ]ONIERSATION:
r-! .r '--T--Lt ?-pre\TFATFTru(r l,1j-- l-AcT IMT llJE
-AgsExicE oF o^/E- Fletr l-loss clot.FT hrtuu fuoT
?pevr,vt 0ccu?rzNcf oF -fr+e_
}T 15 u
Ftzr-
tvolzgTouD THA-t TttE |//2"'/-J4,u-tc /)<rsE
oElr, yELuF z _Aato 2//2"
7tE Cnh/u/T lu/LL BE /.1/574/'LEa bS 5o'r4./ nS PoJlAtl
-ltmrc %n { F.JZ,
CRII'INEL'L FIRE PROTECTIOI'I SYSTEI'IS COMPANY' fNC.
Dlstrlbutlon:
Cr*"r, *o.APPLICATION FOR
TOWN OF VAIL
STREET CUT PERMIT hm
1.
xcava
a
Wonk is fon (ci::cIe one) water sewer gas elec. tele. CATV
Trench width I Dt length 1.8'_ depth 4 tt
_Lineal feet of saw cutting - O at_ per foot
Square feet of pavement a\ at per s.quare foot.
Equipnent needed to be s[pFIIea btTOT Nal-tE
Permit fee ($5.00)
TOTAL COST 9. ALl material must be on the job site before the job is started.10. Anything in the stneet right-of-way must have compaction lifts of one foot,the last eighteen inches will be road base.
Signatune below indicates neview and utiLity location.
Vail Waten and Sanitation Distnict
Bighonn Water District (949-5274)
Gore Valley Water District (949-52
(476-5613 ext 230)
Uppen Eagle Va11ey Sanitation District (SIS:5Z7tr)
Public Senvice Company (9r+9-5?81)
Weste::n Slope Gas Company (Si1ve:rthorn
Holy C:ross Electric Company (\76;527))
Mountain BeI1 Telephone Co Vail Cable TV (476-5377)Vail Fine Protection DistFi
Rubber out-r"iggers on equipment are a must when obstacles can be put in place of r:ubber.f certify that f have :read all requirements of
as amended and will abide by same, and that all Police and Fi:re Depar:tments have been notified Special Conditions
Drt:u€ltt'ov
t_1.
4.
q
.,
8.
L2.
13.
14.
orking on oil. No other
Ordinance No. 7 (Senies 197+)utilities and the Vail
as requined.
tr:!6r I srlSiggaturts
,t -..-f i- o 4rr' '-'L4.
trl_l_l_
Appnoved
Dept. of Public Wonks Inspection Remarks
SKETCH PLAN OF
Show streets with names, buil-dings, and
WORK BELOW
location of Dash Lines Fo:r Cut cut Use
-_-
Thts tg
WHITE - Public Works
'1
NOT a slreel c'ut pormitl
PINK - Contractor YELLOW - Finance
t:
a
DATE OD
t
irFF?n!r\l/r.I}ll,l: I Ir\\t .
o
pEs:cN nDVIEIY DOARD
Septmeber 22, Lg'i7
Bill Ruoff IIEIJBERS PRISEIIT.:
Lou Parker
Bill BishoP
Ron Todd
Abe ShaPiro
TAKEN BY BOARD:
APPnOV.ED: X
DISAPPROVED:
Lodge at Lionshead :
ABSTENTION:_-_.--
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
landsca.pin
ACf,ION
SUITIIJARY:
TAP PERMITWILL NOT BE ISSUED U L TAP FEES HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL.
NAME OF JOB
LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
PLUMBING OR MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR
EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR
SIZE OF TAP: Water
NUMBER OF UNITS
,**"o"2V7ffi)
^ 4 =aoa5,-, ba t-h7L€
Ltc. No.
Ltc. No.
Ltc. No.
7 - I s''/7 4f,^ n(.4 ?i^-l w ?/4q9
Vv= sg
Date Billed
Bldg. Dept. _ White; - Wat€r and Sanitation - Gre€n; - Public Works - Canary; - Contractor - Pink; - Accounting - Goldsnrod
Town of Vail
FTT,F:CTRICAL PERMIT
N9 433
Permit Fee
Inspection Fee
Total
Date Paid...-...
Job N
Date or Apprication.... 7/ /e.......-..........-..-r qz
Elecrrical con o"ror\=rfukf2.. F AZreiC
APPROVALS
BuUdht Ofilclal
THIS FORII T3 E FOSTED 01{
JOB SITE DURII{G COI{STRUCTIOI{
24 HOIJRIi ADVAI\ICE NOTIG
REQI'IRED FOR INSPECTIONS
t"/*/r=
a!,, !tNvrr ! lDa9t
oO
PLUMEilNG/MECHANICAL PEFIMIT
TOWN OF VAIL
"*;;BUILDING: lrn oL"n tnilttttz
cLASS oF woRK: M n eoorrron D nenaooel E nepntn
/l /, tJ
DEscRlprloN oF woRK: /r*, ./t/, O/ltnbtn o Jfn /fu- ,A,U Ud
i0 knil,o ,/ 4l ,/,
/ln7/ranno
m ,{n""-
6
MEGHANICAL: NUMBER NG: NUMBER
VALUATION $ALUATION $
REMARKS:
PERMIT FEE
TOTAL FEES: $
E orseppRoveo
//
'^" /g/#7
|lnl
udt
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
Mr. Chuck Anderson
The Lodge at Lionshead
Vail, Colorado 8f657
lnurn n ll|till u
off ice of the town manager
June 2, 1977
Phase III
Dear Chuck:
Pursuant to our conversation of June 1, 1977, the Town of Vail
is preparecl to make the following statements regarding issuance
of a Building Permit for the l.,odge at Lionshead Phase III.
The Lodge at Lionshead Phase III is designed, as modified, in
accordance with the Uniform Building Code, l-973 Edition' as
amended by the Town of Vai1. It has also received formal
approval by the Design Review Board of the Torvn of VaJ-l, as
described in Article 15 of the Zoning Ordinance, subject to
subrnission and approval of a landscape p1an. This landscape
plan approval may occur after issuance of a Building Permit but
must occur prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The
project is in compliance with the zoning regulations and
environmental regulations of the Torvn of Vai1. It should be noted
that the project is not within the lOO-Year Flood Plain as
outllned j-n the Hydt'o-Triad report of the Gore Creek Flood P1ain.
Upon payment of all appropriate fees, a Building Permit will
be issued for the Lodge at Lionshead Phase III.
Sincerely,
DBPABTMENT OF --"-.-.
COI$IUNITY DEVELOPII-./t' i/ J /.h \//--'-1/f 1 a, ar.^"---7,a {-----t/ t$;il-l-j-am F. Pieree
^
Building Of f ici'a1
wI'P/ j ek
.i I i al .--.', '- I
"g.*-
- e ll o.(t;1/..i iic i p Fex*::; .flJ:*
!nf' / t t t'.^''at\t e tr:) t .,-v\..r
Ji;:s.L.
2,
It s'i:
?nd
1:'i..'.
{ltli
3. iJa:r ' .'L St: '---'
//-:.:
t4 a.t F )r 0 "2i; -.,-;f_:?:-
2.ttc\. 'l'i;r'l ci. Cocrl- r:::s
arrC'..ta'lic1' fourri:ili.::s ii rrr.l
l+ i:l l
it'::r).
t; 'i )r
.1..$ 1;
2t':tj
i. llas
j'trIl. Ila'rh (Sno":t:: c:"fltl,,
S+sin, Toilet)
>:0.25 ::
/r a.r.i ,'50
5S .ti s.oo =
'.J14-no
t4 t4
1.oc = .Q*.9.9-
>l
2. S0 =
J.. LtC =
35,m Wl
Xi t- c)r,::n s Co;;";;rct'c.il l
I)ir;irr.rl ritc r.
I,lrttt'trlt,)/ lir:ll j.tJctr [: .'i.l-].
)rr.';, \ J,1 1i 11i.,-1.,
$clt i;r,g j- t1
.\
o.5o ::: -(:.Q('-,.,
S;rtt:i;t i'{.
L'\:: r,
.t.t,'t: 77Fi7f-
^ \ 11411-J-ll-tit<t 4_r//ild/_
::)i:,l.iiJitiJlllL xtn y{-!l[-*
Pa:;
l.st
2nd
3rC tttlr
lia:;,
1c-f
2rrrl illd
ll r-lr
lln s
'l .: I'
il rrrl
'.1.(l
'I lr t4 ..'lL c'
y.*,"- -
-'t,.F t
I t"
I I
I '11 .t-"I
Jl;l;
l/ltrl
3:"rl
lla .
t
I
I
13.
l.r{ .
t-5.
,LU
? rr -'.
Il 'i )r
(tr 'i.llt: r;!;l'i. t::-
( :;., . ri;.r:,-'t;t oj <;nc )
0u: jj j.dc Sir:':. n):).els
firc: Iiosc Ca];-inc';s
Sclvice S';a'r:i.on
Sr.ri;r,;:rj.ng Pool
))c:.. jt e r's; olt
T0li.riL l'0:fll!lS
l.tl " Ott J.'o:i::ts
):
): 2 .00 ::
): 1.00
x30.00
t . Otr 'l
lt _
U-- - - - -----.-:--- - *----
I 5.00 = 3,ao /x
llii s
.l- s't:
2i,t
3::ri tltlt Cor.r,c:rt ;lon Ce:'ltc::
?i. 0 .1.0 ='
fc.-i:a-.1. U:ri'ts
.l:crlll-o'.ri:rg.1')re cot;:'r:Le'r::ior-r ()f c:cri'ls'i:::itc-lic:l of .-rll-'1- ::er;-i(
Ct-.il;:ir.-r'c.idI s'cl:ur---i'.1:''::!l . 'i:t,u gl:r'i::':i.c:'l slla !..1 pe:l:::o:f;.r a j
f:pr:,.:t;i<:it of a.Ll. p:: e:;ri..': e s to ce-ici-i,', j.tre t.':c- :rtll::,!:c:: of pci:'.'i:s to
]ie rrssr:r:;ci ;:cco:-rj:ii:g to 'tire llat-cr' a:rcl S'::'.;c:l J.'.1 ir i-cn. c:::<i l'?::. i i:
SC7i,.1rl..ll-.: , f:S iitiCJ)(iC:d i a-tlC ';]'il: D-i.s;lr i c:i: S;:::-i.r- :ti.1]iC i:ll)' ad jUS.l'::l'-,:'1-L:.;
,)ecesil.i:.1/ in tlle rr:-i1;i;.r;rJ- ialt f e-c l>:.i<1 . Tirj.:: rn;l--ec'J:r(1;-I sial...l-
aJ-Ercl (i.3'icl::.i nc t.,tie b ui -)- ci.ri-tr g, o',1:rt:;lrs Lt.1tc]' c.nci se'".'cD sct'i'-i'c:c:
L;t.l(a!i:;r:-.
1"' llo...::cl of D-it-cc'.o:':;Vail \'Jtr'ccr- and Sai-ri'.,-ation
2"'717-'7f,-R',
,425 r,
zu.,e5
!J*3-!]so
J- a;r,:l
c:rL:ir^
Di. str.-.-ci
r.icl-r-i.:
PIerce
Brlnel
&
Fltzhugh Scolt lnc.
Architecture
Planning
P. O. Box 2299
Vail, Colorado
81657
303 476-3038
Dare l4ay 5, 1977
ro Mr. Bill pierce
Town of Vail
Box ]00
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re Lodge at Lionshead
.tooHo.
.|599
Gsntlemen:
Wearosending toyou:
^
-
herewith
_ undersooarale cover
-
by messenger
-
toryourapproval
A
-
for your use
-
f or distribution toyou r subcontractors
_ as pef your requesl
-
approved as noied
-
to be corrected
the following on lhe above project:
Structural Ca] cul ati ons.
Very truly yours,
Ray Story
PIERCE, BBINER & FITZHUGH SCOTT INC.
-
Destroy or mark "VOlD" any prints previously issued to you not boaring revision date of
-
as noled in the revision column.
GRINNEIt
SYSTEMS
COMPANY,INC.
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
PROVIDENCE, R. I.
GR I NII ELL 6e
52M NORTH BROADWAY
DENVER, COro. 802r6
TEL (303) 573.8711
TELeX: 45-861
llay 4, 1977
llr. Bi I I
Town of
Bui i d'i ng
Pi erce
Vai I
DeDartment
P ail, Colorado 8L()57
Lionshead I I I
Condominiums 8r Parkinq Garaee
Gentl emen:
Confirming my teiephone conversation r,rith you and lir. J. Ruoff of the Fire Deoartment, on llarch 29, 1977, it r,.ras mutua111r
arlreeable that the tlvo (2) 4" standoipes could be of the
combined vret-pipe tgrpe, each r,,rjth 1%" and 2!i" valves. This
to be acceptable in lieu of ]ltr" r^ret standpipe and a 4" dr.v
standoipe. The reasoninq behind this beine both stajr',relIs
and standpipes are within the heated building. These r.lould
be supolied also by a conmon fl',r" v ?Lr" x 4" fire deoartnent
siamese connection, accessible on the urest end of the building
which will also supply the dr;r-nioe snrinkler s.ystem in the
parkino qarage.
You advjsed plans have been revie'leC by ysup department and
that Mr. J. Ruoff concurned on the above standpipe arranger,rent.
l.le expect to subrnit shop drawings vrithin thirty to fort1,6617s,
pendinq receipt of a contract.
S'i ncerely,
PROTECTION
FIRE PR0TECTI0II SYSTET4S CCllPAl{Y, Ii'lc.
L. R. Cleary
Sr. Contract'i ng Engineer
cc : Plr. Ri cll St.urm
Beckett 8: llarmon Engineers
7456 t"l. 5th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80226
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers PBONE (3031 444-195t
uv JXQ oarcd.Bl-2fu. neo
urFr.l/.I 4rt EA4.'
SHEET NO / OF L1T",'A
-_ ,, - ^;'tr.,,i/ t t')i'ir)/9.
CHKD. BY- OATE PROJECT PRELIiI.
25PSF !
rl1
r ',/Pl,olthHdah.: ht/ ,t,/,/.' ' /"Lry7N44ti.
.?z/X/ ,
n 2Y b,u,t//.
,1
n O k'FT
Plo zsil-
4 = 2,2> 14' ,
S - /r72 or43
f:/,/6.
I
Av ^*r/n uhrww Aara/ uur/:/,r/tr/,
fio*y ,,ttu"futr )
b*Urw a'^il,4/ "o/a/n-'-/1n*'
t 6R'E sT/FFEt/ERS
cA!]A tl/10 x//,b*
1r'./rt*ug c*k*rQ,aUil.Ja,a tO ,,/
6g,E k 6^/ 6 u/ -/otir, 6st,tt{rt,ocs/olovB
:
^/ -/
\)t. ,
n(?+zytg)
A7, +
*/
t/s 7
I
I
I JOHNSON-VOILAND-AnHULETA, lNC._ Consulting tnsinS
*)Yq- oor.{ftL-uE- rcBr /1,5:i -
.HKD. By-DArE paotecr l/0111,'!'i'' P,+l{Jll //,/ -
PHONE {303) 444-1951
SHEET t{0 / oF--
eaettu. Y 9tTfuVy' lJ.-s
cuenr li FII{AL n
,{-y)-
IJ
, 3,?3 5
Mo' /,70 G) ^ 3,fifi,:,,'-) =-,7
/'l,tskfE,1,p 1
y = rg,7Y,c) = /,J7 /,-,-.- //.r
| (, t rtl J^Jl:,'
k= lb,./? /.t t,.t.,,,/l: , .6,. . \' .
t1: tf, ,t,:ll /7'/5 = 4J
K
r tl i'- //-t /i/..-tt)
a)- r j
n /w,|u,rr,r"*/'l* /-b "/
tv*=0,rr)O,i.)= t,31'' r"Frfr'
k = 61,7 y=,0012-
4s = ,08b /,,y f +a)l(ity.:,,il
it.t',, tt,ttf ls 1 //ry -y'&{,tc0/6/
[( ,ju /+i,e,r
6frt\.-, i /tu,/r= LIf
at'l{q14/6" vel-
rto t.f s a /[" u/ I y' "'"1!,' rn
/( = (), t f )5*,:ti)/rz\l-?,rz:,,)'= 3/,7
31rye; n7={=6 /= .0008+/g @(10" = J'/4-\' rr<ca f-iCf er,:Et,1o/,
ar /-t^';,
d ' /,/"i'J
6'62fl,i=
/6* '0/2
i
A'/il =
^ .,/fm: L2a',fiI
f ' ' "oo4t
n/- 'q - ,/.5rz iTtr //c.
r: ' .,/,,i'/ .' ',',1r" ,t4o t].
n
/y "o*,1
JoHNsoN-volLAND 1RI - sY JXq o^rEEEfrA/-E-
CHKD. BY- DATE
ULETA, lNC, Consulting Engineers pBoNE r3o3) 444-rs5r
Joat /br\'9
- O sHEEr r{o /, oF-
eaotecr t/,ot/c, c1f a- t 4 . '1 .C htJ,l!F-f-PRELIM.---._--
FINAL r'clrerr 4
s\E fso/L
r./00 +.072+
{, 1a 1\i1J
pf, colO,
.o7g = ,7t/7 KLF
r!-0
cAfti/t
i,tf€F.QlM0r /""tl]N;
eor, - -/0q f 100 =+fi Vs[
€urir . floq t loa z 301 7s,1
rfP/c4 l- strcn7il
SEC770,i/ AT g/'.1
f.EFEE EilcF S//€Fr # O :
!'Uaor>/tt/- = '247X 3=
ClJFC/:
,7/ *tF
STA,4/lt) L)VA'F., qln4t'E t'.,itt!tv, i
r ,2-/H = .r/0a )-ft = z/.72 r-Ef
au/rtc e,,4 y'y' :/g ,0 A'FT ADz/V2 p,e$74rl S5 FZ/cp ltER 3!0 il/wl=t/2t)'t
o.-l,n/= 1.25" e*ax o.rri/ = 3,875lt str 0K,
$
tro sr -T6.,
+
t,58KLF I
| 1vt'z tt'I i ', ./'I i,
",,,/
,
I li;t: i I lu"' i I I
",
1 Itt
1 ,.'I r
',vt --- k't -.--
"YorlL . i-zr\ | .,nr41. ( 'z) | ou,, 'i
a ,,/'l I z. ot' '
,f''r |,1, i q nrttrl I z,t"t, :r'1."1' I 'A I h71"|'
/romas(nuttlb *i'itD "'";*'" """ r "" "i.tt
I t")r' | ,53 |rEH | - p.6,'t!4 -ty | -rff +M |,"0 ;
Lof l+rt,4 '?
tetf | -15 t'72
t'rop fofr | | ,|t -3 t t ,..::\[, ,. J^ P, J ('l'7.t .//0
JoHNsoN-vortol: 1u
BY UX/./ DATE t/:.4 t/,//
CHKO. BY- DATE
-
ULETA, lNC. Consulting t**r:
,oao lbBf
pnOJECTIt0/^./i.t/.'/ 11 t.'i^iL - ' '. \'^': :;:
cuewf,R.rF,9
PHONE (3031 444-1951
D nrl ,'
SHEET 1{0 7lc.'', , oF_
PRELlttl.
-
/"'FII{AL 'n
lt,2''
-l:';;+lhtQ
lq,0
lt2
.8h
/b,t
t/trorl L
-
2/,1
{,:in
7/ ''
3.57t/
5 '"1ri
i
-t-rf t. r-t:/2,2 ;- 28,8
Ttfl l=z.z7,s,l
/-k='{W
/ f='oozs x4/t t
utSl
r fir/xt,5T= 110
,003/ /9 , ae,,i,/tt
,* p 7f a;@1u/r,,
e1. #q@'/'/f
$tt,q t,8
n
JOHN SON-VOILAND-ARCIiULETA, lNC. Consulting Engtneers pHoNE 1303) 444-resr
BY ',-l onre r ', O ,ou, I sHEET No-oF-
.HKD. By_ DATE _ 7,.g1gg1 tl",?tt, t .t' , r'r, /it',i - pRELlM.'--------=.--=---.--
CLIENT 7 F/'S
Tt"ritt t 0!LCt//tit tar t5 Q' Elsr t>:i'! ,t '/tr!.' ::f,,'l/ 7 :
rU ar ibl
tE')vlr|t,,,t r'<rG .Jt€z'/ot-l i
4',
'llTt
,r_,,
Jy__
4"
v tr'771/t/t,ttti Tllis ';7"-^"r '.'.t'./
-
FINA L
1r.,.),/ -/,;u f"/I, t,{-RtlhaD:7t 7-
f.r .',
i=/(tr )
I /z , 2 /,35
ttt./ti (7/)
".f , t /i \2 |
(4x /L I
11
\, -" I '(.."-..,t ," P
/.) ltt"'
- \ , -+ r \ l-.
;. )(3 iL" .;-,(o\!
.!,1 . t: ?-/',r' '-. '.;; :' .' / l',/'l -_t)^)l_),-,r//c)
7b ,4-/ ,
/,45'/:t:r
( z"un ,ru;i:-
L/.t./t^' ,:,:l
.7/ rt "'x, i1,{,
.!''.:':,a tj ' /s( Ln/rt
,bi{trlr''., r'-1 Z9-' 'uti-,
g:;a '"y'r r t -.r\.{t., | -1'l / i i, t
<....'.'ll\"tl''' z/,6'r
i:/ilt'.
::ll;I::l'l " -5' H l:-,r""
c onsut'r ns Enei nT
.r*0. ,r' DATE enoncr u0 tD!: a','' Ct)t t' f - f/:'i"'il- tI
,//0 rcr /-G
,ll 7 ktF
l,-A.
B\LT rhrrt
(i,,a(bIlr)
t,t/6F
,tse /8
Xz/372,41t
u,v//t/ay''e\,'
*FLD EA E//D
,
cuenr E E" F.5--,
PHON E (303) 444-195r
ETTE/Fh?f,
SIfEET l{O- OF tIA 1.:{'/'"
PRELIM.
FINAL v'
/^
-
f
'al 'i1
+_
4\tr'
1t F
t.l l2l vr
t tSF
PLAN XN)
cfu,l t,,q,,,ls,y l-,,b ! inlYs)= ,,,=,220
//=,zr-"(1z!)/'e -,z / * rr.
sr,t4i/ = z,7S 9;.r ply,v1'./, t t,l/ .'l; -
R = ,35 /( rc[ 3 - /bei r/4.U.,} 41/',y7 ,:.t
/4,,1),/,i .' -t, /"r/. :
t., = [z't 5'( z'ti/: /: = , // 4 ,/' -7 1,f : ,/.t/f 1,,! t /t .. ,/Zf
:-,x- /,bE 1-':Yf = S,/z/>'7 /,hi'|Llk'. /0r f
,ut/ fu; /::, t"t ht',.t."/ :
f( = .tzs> (.' t"Dhi il =, 1 / /<-Fi/tf
sr= [tt [1.--\fi; bl =, 6 k7
9x^*n,/.,603M3 gAf 0k s/t/eF RtlL/-/
HlVF 6/,ry/i/ E'tVl:t/'iE "
//o'rF:f4tt/ oF FlcE Pl/S //U97 ,eE
VFRTICI L .
llsE CLtrA/ER Lb zxz-x/3 X216t
,rf/,ift;r: H = .zr5(-:1.) f= .34 = r/rr
9v=,zbl(', r)/zt 6 =,zo/ r/3/,tlj!^)t
Raq/-e
/!l,rl,
'tn.L /Sfs /-Er.st//)firT. o/c ,
;/tiii/,'ait'a:;fii::,b'd|o A//su,t /s/ ar{rl,
n
,'(it, !/ "rll7tut
lnwn
box 100
Yail, colorado 81657
€{r3l 476.5613
office of the town manager
February 17, 1977
Mr. Ray Storey
c/o Pierce, Briner & Fitzhugh Scott
Box 2299
Vail , CoLorado 81657
Dear Ray r
On February 16 , lg77 I completed a plan check of your
subnnission oi plans for the Lodge at Lionshead
Phase III. Investigatlon of and compliance wlth (but not necessarily limited to) the following items wilI be neeessary j-n construction of this building.(Please see attached sheets)
Sincerely,
. Pierce
Official
o
LODGE AT LIONSIIEAD
PHASE III
ITEM 1
Gypsum board ceilings used in conjunction with fire resistive
assemblies should not be supported at intervals exceeding 16"
(Tab1e No. 43-C, itern No, 27)
ITEM 2
All structural parts must receive one hour fire protection.
ITEM 3
Overflow drams or
Section 3207 (c),
ITEM 4
scuppers must he provided in accordance with
There sha1l be no enclosed usable space under the stairways i-n an exit enclosure, nor shal1 the open space under such stairways be
used for any purpose (Section 3308 (f)). In that the area for elevator equipment is impossible to relocate this use will be permitted
if there is a three hour separation (including door) between this
space and the exit enclosure.
ITEM 5
Door 113, 134 ln that there exit doorways
ITEM 6
and other doors to storage areas must be relocated
sha1l be no openings into exit enclosures except
and openings in exterior wa1ls (Section 3308 (c)).
A1I doors in an exit enclosure shall be protected by a fire assembly
having a fire protection rating of not less than one hour where
one hour construction is permitted.,,Doors shall be maintained self-closing or shall be automatic c1osing...(Section 3308(c)).
ITEM 7
A stairway in an exlt enclosure shall not continue below grade
unless an approved barrler is provi.ded at the ground floor level to prevent persons from accidentally continuing into the basement (Section 3308 (e)).
ITE}I 8
AII required interlor stairways which extend to the .top floor in any building four or more stories in height sha1l have an approved
hatch openable to the exterior (Section 3305 (1)), provided that a ladder is lnslalled in an approved location 1n each interlor stair
conformance with Section 3305 (n) will not be requied. Provi-ded
that compliance with Section 3305 (n) ls achieved, ladders wl11 not be
ITEM 8 cont.
requlred.
ITEM 9
Fireplace hearths are not
constructed in accordance
ITEM 10
A11 F-1 occupancy must
System in accord with
shown on Sheet lll-1 is
connecti-ons, types and
ITEM 12
floor plans but must be
3707 (k).shown.on the
with Section
Unless south wal1 of the mechanical rooms L22 and 123 provide a
three hour separation door, 143 must be A label and of course
self-closing or automatic closing,
ITEM 11
be provided with an Automatic Fire Extinguishing
Section 3802. Greater detail of larzout
necessary for review. The Fire Department
location must be approved by the Fire Department
Dry Standpipes and IYet Standpipes must be provided in accordance
with Section 3803 and 3804. This building sha1l be classified a
4-story building for fire protection purposes in that Section 1102 (a)
a11ows classification of H occupancy as a separate building for the
purpose of area limitation, limitation of number of stores, and Type
of Construction,
ITEM 13
Exhaust systems must be provided to garage with cfm ratings stated.
The entire ventilation system must be in conformance with the
provisions of Section 1105.
ITEM 14
Except for miscellaneous interior parti,tioning, the entire building
must be at least one hour construction (Seetion 1302 (b)). This is
intended as a general note with no specific indication presented.
ITIIM 15
These wi-ndows must be used as emergency exit windows in accordance
with Section 1304.
ITEM 16
Doors opening into corridors must be in compliance with Section 3304 (h)
ITEM 17
Elevators must be vented in accord with Section l-706 (d).
ITEM 18
Exit doors shall be openable from the inslde without the use of keys
or any special knowledge or effort (Section 3303 (c)). In that
hardward sehedule was not submitted, conformance cannot be verified.
ITEM 19
Glass in skylights must be wire glass or protected by wire screen
in accordance with Chapter 34.
ITEM 20
o
inches of the floor subject to human impact or any
stair landings must be tempered g1ass.Glass witbin 18
other glass at
ITEM 21
Structural calculations must be submitted.
Also enclosed is a copy of ny standard plan correction 1ist. If I
can be of further asslstance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
DEPARTMENT OF '-\.
Building Offic,ial'.
rrY DE:lr*.ry
Juftionor.......\AlL.'.C.(?L$ . ". .
GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST
z
Fire Zone No.-...--.-..V.Stories..-?.-f
Occupant Load
civ...%itr..
State.
Tofal Allowable rrcor erea ..2$ O4/.. ....Sq. Ft.
Basis for Increase ...Lfu.P.ffim..fusa4,
.ta./a(ne.a)
.t. / aa %* (a. p-e (h)) mutn ob*v
COMMENTS OR ASSUMPTIONS:
,Fn Corrections checked below
The approval ot Plans and
State Law,
are to be made on plans betore permit is issued.
specificat,ons does not permit the violation of any section of the Building Code, or other City Ordinance or
GENERAL
Unobstructed yards of :..........feet
Valuation should be $ .. .......
Grourid elevations should be shown at corners
of the building and at chantes In ground sloDe.
The ground el€vatlons should be taken at the
lowest point between the exterror wall and a
point 5 teet out or at the proDerty lrne, rf
closer, where the exterror wall rs parallel to and
within 5 feet of a publrc srdewalk allev, or
other public way, the ground elevatrons should
be the elevatron of the publrc way. The number
of stories in thrs buildrng cannot be determrned
until this data rs futnrshed.
(b) Total width of all openings limited to 25 per
cent of the wall length in the story under
consideration.(c) All openings protected with fire assemblies
having a fire-fesistive rating of one.and.one.
half (three) hours.
(d) Oucts through area separation walls should
be avoided. lf allowed. fire dam0ers on each
side of the wall are requrred. Sectron 30.102,
U.8.C. Standards.
A fire.resistive occupancy separation in conform.
ance with Table No. 5.8 and Section 503 is
Horizontal occupancy separations should be sup.
ported with a structural system havrnq eourva.
lent fire-res6tive protectron. Sectron 503 (d).
The build rng ts limited
(.... . . ...... -.-. feet an
structure- Section 507 and Table No. 5.O.
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
Show job address on plans.
Give name of person responsible for plans.
Submit fullv dimensioned plot plan.
Give all dimensions on Plot Pl3n,
ABEA LIMTTATIONS ANO GENERAL
OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS
The total floor area is lrmited lo
sourre tcei. SeclrJns 5C5 and
bc maintained otr .,. ............. ...,,
of the building tor area Purposes.
s hou ld
sides
Section 506.Type V (lll.N) (lv.N)
in Frre Zone No. l.
Roof covenngs should be
1603 (a) or 1704. Oetails
bu ildings are not Dermrtted
Sectron 1602 (ai.
fire retardant. Sectron
or specrficatrons Com.(e) are rcqutred.
Provrde detarls to show that
.hour Jrea seD,rrJtron wSlls should
Sectron 505 (c).
(a) Ertend vertrcally from the foundation
goint 30 inches abov€ the roof.
toa
t 3.
g with Section 32O3
N
t5.
+.'iil"Jl1,!111?" :?' I ?i ; ;; ; ;; ;;i,l'.it :l
Section ........,........... 03 (a).
N1
16.Openings in extenor (court) walls within ....,,......
feet of property lines should be protect€d
with three-fourths-hour fire assemblies. Sectio.l
............-..... 03 (b).
OE
t7.Usable space under the first lloor except in
Group l(J) Occupancres shouid be enclosed
as reguired in Section 1703.
OL
18.Fire'resistive constructron for structural elements
in the exterior wails snould comoty ?rth Foot-
note No. I of Table No. l7.A and Sectrcn
- . - . . . . : . . . . . - . , . . . . . See Section l702 tor clar)ltcatioD.
/)A t9.Building paper should be applred to extenor
walfs as specrfied in Sectron L7O7 (a).
20.Enclosures for floor oDenrngs snouid comply with
Table No. 17.A, Sectron 1706, and Chapter 30.
Oetails should cle;rly indrcate thrs.
o(
2t,Slrlctural members carryrflB masonry or con.
crete walls in buildings over one story In height
should be protected wrth minimum one"hour
llll'_ltilillll T::t:t I1'"
.-..-..........-..-........-..
NH
22.Nonabsorbent finish and backing for torlet room
walls and tloor should contorm wrth Section lTrr (a).
e/23.Shower stall walls should be finished wrth a hard.
nonabsorbent surface to a hiight of 6 {eet.
Section 1711 (b).
24.Doors and ganels of shower and bathtub en-
closure should comply with Section 1711 (c)
to (e).
nA 25,Parapet walls not less than inches in
height are required. Sectton 1709.
OK
26.Eave overhangs and similar architectural pro.
i:*: *: ::i:'l::li :::lll llll
fii 27.Metal roofing (siding) should be bonded and
grounded in conformance wrth the local eiec.
trical code. Sectron 1715.
NA
2A.Projections beyond the extenor wall should con.
form with the least restrctrve ot the tojlowrng:
(a) A point one.thrrd the drstance to the property
fine trotn an extertot wall. Sectron 504 (b).
(b) A point one.thrrd the drstance trom an as-
sumed vertical plane located where trre-
resistive protection of openrngs ts tirst re-
quired due to locatton of ptopeny, Sectron
504 (b).
hz
29.Envelopc ceilings should satisfy the following
conditions ISectron 4303 (b) 6.1:
(a) Should not be used to provrde trre protectton
beam and Sirders supportlng more than 0ne
lloor.
(b) Columns should be rt.divrdually fire protected.
(c) Duct and oultel ocenrnes rre ir"r',led to 100
square inches rn each I00 square teet o,
ceilinS area and should be Dtotected lytth
approved tare dampers.
(d) Electrical outlet boxes should-be ol steel and
not greater than 16 square inches In area.
m L
Gypsum bcard cerlrnqs rn coniunctton wrth fire'
resisttve assembtres shouid be Supporled at
intewals not exceeding l5 inches. ltem 25,
Table No. 43.C.
ld stripping or suspended wood systems for
Tpsum board ceilings snould be not less than
-inch nominal thickness. Section 4704 (b).
ISection 4703 (b) for wall stripping.l
Final partition layouts and details should be sub-
mitted prior to Installation to justity complianig-
with occupancy, tire-resrstrve, structural, i
exrt req u rrements,
Justitying test data in conformance wrth Section
106 or an ICBO research recommendation is
required for
,l3.
Rooms in which rubbish (,jnen) chuteg terminate
should be separated lrom the remainder of the
building wjth a one.hour occupancy separation.
Section 3003.
Openings into rubbish and
not be located in reouired
ways. Section 3003.
SPECIAI. OCCUPANCY REQUIREMEHTS
Group B
8.3 Occuoancies should be ot one-hour tire.
resistive construction if located in a basement
or above the first story. Section 702 (b).
B-2 Occupancies with an occupant load of 1000
or more should be in Type l, ll, or l/l one-hour
buildings. The assembly room should not be
in a basement it it cantains this high occupant
load. Section 702 (b).
The main entrance should tront directly upon or
have a 20-foot wide access to a pubiic way at
least 20 feet in width. Section 703.
Light and ventilation should comply with Section
70 5.
A one.hour fire-resistive occupancy separatior' ,-
required between the boiler or central heatrng
plant and the rest of the building. Sectton 708.
Exterior openings for rooms containing a boiler
or cenlral heating planl should be protected
with three.fourths.hour fire,resistrve assemblies
that are fixed. autornatic, or seit-c,osjng it lo-
cated below openings in another story or it less
than l0 feet trom other doors or wrndorys in
the same buildrng. Section 708.
Group C
Buildings housing Group C Occupancies should be ol one'hour fire.resistive constructron
throughou[. S€ction 802 (a) and Tabie No. 5.C.
Use ol rooms' should be clarilied. Note that
rooms having an occupant load ot rnore than
IOO and rooms used tor kindergarten, tirst. ot
second grade cannot be located above the frrst
story above Srade except fi Type I construc.
.tion. Section 8QZ (b).
A one.hour fire.resistive separation is required
between laboratories, shops, storage rooms,
These areas should also be seoarated from
other classfooms. Sectron 802 (b).
?q line n chutes should
exrt corridors or stair-
41.
42.
One required exit should front direclly upon, or
have a ?o.foot wide access to, a public tyay at
least 20 feet in wrdth. Sectron 803 (a).
Sanrt3ry facrlrties should be provided
ance wrlh Sectron 805.
In accoro'
Light and ventilation should comply with
805.
Shcct No......?......of........6..........shclt3
-3 Sei il.;. -
44.o,lli;i.Tlli',iJi;i',L:i.'i'3i?,iil"f i13i,ii
Dtant and the rest of the building. Section 808.
Group O
49.Group D, Oivision I Occupancies should be of
Typ€ | or ll constructto.l unless complying wr:',
the Exception In Sectron 902 (b).
50.Group D, Division 2 (3) Occupancies should be
of one-hour fire resistrve constructton through-
out. Table No. 5 C.
5l Lisht and ventilation should comply wrth Section
905.
52.A one-hour lire.resistrve occugancy Separation rs
reouired between the botler or central heatrng
glant and the rest ot the burldinS. Section 908.
53.Exterior openings for rooms containing a boiier
or central heatinE plant should be protected
with three.fourths.hour frre'resrstrve assemblles
that are f ixed, automatrc, or self 'clos nq tl
located below openings In another story or rf
leSS than 10 feet trom other doors or wrndows
in the same building. Sectron 908.
Group F
54.Motor vehicle service Stations should be of non'
combustible or one.hour fire'resrstive construc'
tion. Section 1 10? (b).
55.Storage areas in excess ol 1000 square feet in
connection with wholesale or retall sales should
be seDarated from the pubiic areas by a one'
hour tire.resistive occupancy separation unless
the building is equrpped throughout with an
automatic tire-extingurshing system. Section
tt02 (b).
56.Light and ventitation should comply with Sectaon
lLOs. '/S +q shall b. t4kelr CEh cro{lrd€,
57.Exhaust ventilation at or near tloor level i5 re'
quired by Sectron I 105.
58.A one.hour.fire'resistive occupancy separation ls
reouired between a botle. room or central heat'
ing plant and the rest of the bualding. Section
1r08.
Group H
Itll It
59.A Group H Occupancy mor€ than two stories In
hei8ht or havrng more than 3000 square teet
above the tirst floor should be of one-hour
fire.resistive construction thtoughotrt. Section
t3o2 (b).
'''t'V
@.The following rooms should have wlndow areas
as specitied in Section 1305 (a), one'half of :Ti:::::r::ii .
0Y
6r Mechanical ventilating system in bathrooms
ShOUld Orovide 5 ["ic sou': aif Change directly
to the outside. Sectron 1305 (a).
fn
62.Windows from .......... ............ should
not be considered as turnishing required light
or ventilation since they do not open to a yard'
court. or gtreet in accordance wrth Section
1305 (a).
nft
63.Couns bounded on four 3rdes tJith walls shouid
be at least 10 feet in length. For courts more
than two sliones in he,Anl. lhe tequired v/rotb
should be rncreised by one foot and the re-
quired length by 2 teet for each additlonal
story. Section l306 (c).
/^
Group J Occupancies are limited to 1000 (3000)
square feet in tloor area and one story in
height. Section 1502.
72.
74.
Exhaust ventilation
quired by Section
a garage are re.openrngs
1f,u4.
Garages shoufd not open directly into a room
used for sleeping purposes. Section 1504.
An approved noncombustible material is required
tot Earcge tloor surfaces. Section 1504. Asphal.
::: ::T::l: :::l l_"i lril'_
EXIT REQUIREMENTS
An occupant load sign is required in classrooms.
assembly areas, etc., having an occupant load
of more than 50. Section 3301 (j). See.,.,-.......
Conlorming erits are required lrom the areas
below as specitied in Section 3302 (a).
Exits should have a minimum separation of one.
tiflh the oerimeter o{ the room or area serveo,
Section 3302 (c). Note that "penmeter" is
along the outef boundary ot the room or area
served. ............
No point in the building should be more than
150 (200) teet from an exteflor exrt, hor20ntal
erit, enclosed starrway, or exrt passaqewJy,
measured in the direction of travel. Sectron
3302 (d).
Exit doors should swing in the direction ot
egress. Sectton 3303 (b). See doors ...........,....
Double acttng doers are not allowed where serv'
Ing a t butary occupant load of more than I00.
Sectron 3303 (b).
Exrt Ccors should be openable from the rnsi':e
wrthout the use of a key, lgectal knowiL'o.,'..1, . r
eftort. Sectaon 3303 (c). Note also that flush
bolts or surtace bolts'are grohibrted.
itable rooms in cellars are not
bita ble room" delinrtron an
intent is to prohibit such
allowed. See
Section 4Ca
rooms tO be
se pa ra t ion
or central
buildinB.
formed with retaining walls.
' ii;;;' ih; ;;;i.,''l"iii,i'c" h;'#iT"o';;:.":i
Section 1307 (a).
''riiu'J' i '.inlm"n"' i J pliiliJi' i, J8'"i ;:"":1
square feet. Section 1307 (b)
A toilet room should not open directly into a
kitchen. Section 1305 (b). €.4Fpr,o!:
Eff rciency. ^d\r^elling unrts should comply wtth
tecuon I JU6.
A one.hour fire.resistive occupancy is reouired between a boiler room
heating plant and the rest of the
Section 1312.
Every dwellang unit and guest room should have
comfort heating facilities as specilied in Section
't ?l I
rl.r
//7n')
oy
a2.Exit doors should be lf*imum size of 3'x 6'8"
with a minimum door swing o{ 90 degrees.
!'ection 3303 (d). ............-.....-
Af-
83.The net dimension (clear width) at doorways
should be used in determrntng extt wrdths
reguired by Section 3302 (b). Sectron 3303
(d). In consideration of door thicknesses' panrc
hardware, door swing, etc., the requrred exlt
widths have not been futnished. See door
dlL
84.A tloor or landing not more than 2 inches belo"/
the threshold is required on each slde of an
exit door. S€ction 3303 (h).
6y
85.Ooors should not proJect more than 7 inches jnto
the required corndor wrdth v/hen fuily opened
or more than one-half Into the regurred corri'
dor width when in any positton. Section 3304
(c).,.................
AL 86.Revolving (sliding) (overhead) doors are not per'
mitted as exit doors. Section 33O3 (f).
.*
87.Exit doors should provrde immedrate access to
an approved means of egress. Section 3303 (S).
Exiting through another room does not comply.
ap
88.A landing or floor that is level or not more than
2 inchei lower than the threshoid is reguired on
each side of an exit door. Section 3304 (h).
el<
89.Corridors should have a minimum width of 44
inches. Section 3304 (b).
o/1
90,Corridors serving nonambulatory persons shou-ld
have an 8-fooi mtnimum wrdth. Sectron 3318
(c).
al 9t.Dead end of corridors and exit balconies are
limited to 20 feet. Section 330'1 (e)'
Oll
92.Walls and ceilings of corridors should be of one'
hour lire.resisiive construction. Section 3304
(f). An architectural section through the. corri-
d6r is necessary to determine how this is
accomplished.
Ole
93.Exterior exit balconies cannot proiect into an
area where protected openings are requrreo.
::-*:-*1:l:
o/1
94.Interior openings into corridors should be pro'
tected as set forth in Table No. 33'8 and
Section 3304 (g).
o//
95.Openings located between the end of an exterior
ixit balcony and the neatest statrway should
be orotecte'd as requtred for corrrdors. Section
3304 (s).
o&
96.Stairway
a minimum tvidth ot inches' Trim
and handrails should not proiect more than
3Vz inches into the required wldth. Section
3305 (b).
o/1
97.Risers on steinvays should not exceed 7 r,/z
inches and runs should not be less than l0
inches. Section 3305 (c).
o(
98.Landings on stairways should have a drmenston
in ths direction of travel equal to the wtdth of
the stairway but need not exceed 4 teet. Sec'
tion 3305 (f).
7
99.Easement ponion ol starrways should h6ve an
aoprcved barfler wh€.e conttnuous to u0per
flobrs in an errt enclosure, Sectton 3305 (g).
otL 00.Vcrtical distances between stairway landinSs are
limited to l2 te€t. Section 3305 (h).
)lL
l0r.Jrails should be placed not tess than 30
ifiEhes nor more than 34 inches above the
tread. Seclion 3305 (i). Two handrails are re'
quired where stairways exceed 44 inches in
width.
?/L
LO2.Guardrails for stairs. balconies, and landin?l
should conform wlth Section 1714. Note t
maxrmum clearance between intermediate fa, -
is 9 inches.
dr
tn?Ooenines in exterior walls within 10 feet ot
exterro-r stairways should be protect€d wrth
self.closinB threeJou rths-ho u r fire-resrstlve a3'
semblies. Section 3305 (k).
f\1 /
104.
,I
Enclosed usable space under interior statrways
should be protected on the enclosed srde as
reouifed for one-hour fire'resistive construc'
tion. Section 3305 (l).
0u NoncombustjbJe exterior stairs are required. Sec'
tion 3305 (m).
0v
IUO.Exterior stairs should not project into an area
(yards or courts) !yhere wall opentngs must ba
orotected. Section 3305 {m).
lvn
107.
b
One stairwav should extend to the roof. Section
3305 (n). li must be in a smokeproof enciosure
in buitdines over four stories In heiSht. Sec'
tion 3309-(b).
oll
108.Six.toot 6-inch minimum headroom clearance for
stairwavs should be indicated on plans. Section
3305 (o). Note that this is from a ptane tangent
to the stairway tread nosangs.
np 109.
t1A
ll0.Surface of ramDs should be roughened or of a
nonslip material. Section 3306 (f).
lrF
IE,
nf)
trE
l/Fa
111.
4,15
ft8
,17
t*
Stairways should be enclosed as specitied in
Section 3308.(") O;; Goi-t'our fire.resistive walls are 4{
ouired.
(b) Only exit doors are allowed to open into exit
enclosures.
(c) Doors should be labeled one (one'and'one'
half)-hour fire assemblies.
(d) Exit enclosures should include a corridor on
the ground tloor extending to the exterror.
Fire.resistive construction should be as re'
auired for the exit enclosure, includrng pro'
tected openings. Only exlt doors are per'
mitted to oPen Into the corrldor.
(e) An approved barrier is requrred at thq gfound
floor to prevent people from accidently con'
tinuing to the lower level.(0 Usable space is not allowed under the starrs.
?//I12.One exit from the building should be a smoke'
qlo91..q! 919.s^u,-9 gol'lply,I F_ y'Jl- Sect io n 330e.
f{-
113.Openrngs into exrt courts less than 10 feet wtde
should be protected with labeled 45-minute fire
assemblres. Sectron 33Il (e). Also see exrt
court" detinition In Sectron 3301 (c). Ooenings
more than l0 feet above the coun floor are
exemDted.
0/
114.No openjngs othet than reguired exrts are 9er'
mitted in exit Dassa8/eways. The passageways
should be ot .. ... I .hour frre.reststrve
conslructron. Sectron'3311 (a ).
n4 ll5.i Exrt illumrnatron and signs shoutd be pfovid€d In
I conformance wrth Sectron 3312,
rv.
t t5.Arsle (cross aisle) In audrtonum should haFl
minimum width of ........-........-.-..---..-...-. Secr,o,'
3313 (b). Section 3313 (e).
Shcct No......{.......ot.....-..6..........Sheet3
r
I
r\
n tl7.
,
Panic hardv/are rs ret
'Ed
on exrt doqrs servinq
Group B Occupancres hav'ng an occCoant load
of more than 100. Section 3316 (a). In lieu
of this, doors shall have no locks or latches.
rh rl8.Main and side exrts in cQnformance wrth Sec'
tioft 3315 are required tor 8'2 (l) Occupanoes.
Section 3316 ( a).
ft rl9.Cofridors of Grouo C Occuoanctes should have a
width required by Section 3.302 plus 2 feet, but
not less than 6 feet. Sectron 3317 (a).
ht
720.Each lloor above or belcw the ground t,oor level
of Grouo C Occuiancies shourd have no less
than two exit starts. Sectlon 3317 (c).
fit
tzt.Exit stairs servrng an occupa0t load of more than
100 in a Group C Occupancy should have a
minimum clear width of 5 feei. Sec on 3317
(c).
Exit doors cannot bg mote than 2 feel natrawer
than the required corrrdor width rn Group C
Occuoancies. Sectron 3317 (d ).ft 122.
)
04 123.Exit doors trom schoolrooms should swing in
the direction of egress. Sectron 3317 (d).
n,4
124.Rooms ot Group C Occupancies used by pupils
and located below grade should have one exrt
leading directly to the exterior of the building.
Section 3317 (e).
NA
t2s.Panic hardware is required on exrt doors servrng
rooms containing more than 100 occupants
and in corridors bf Group C Occupancres. Sec'
tion 3317 (f).
nt
,26.
I
Everv room in a Group D Occupancy should have
access to at least two legal means of egress.
Section 3318 (a).
/)t
t27.
I
Doors from bedrooms and wards of Group D
Occupancies and all exit openrngs where non'
ambulatory patients are housed should have a
minimum clear width of 44 inches No oro'
jections in this width arc atlowed. Section 3318
(b).
fit
128.Panic hardware is requtred on exrt doors servrng
more than 50 occupants in Group O Occupan-
cies unless there is no latch or lock. Section
3318 (f).
lt&
129.
11l{
Every.sleeping room below the fourth floor
should have one openable window or exterlor
door conforming to Sectron 3320 for emer'
gency extt or rescue.
FLOOR, ROOF CONSTRUCTION. COVERING'
SKYLIGHTS. ROOF SIRUCTURES
Cft
130.The space between wood lloot constructton and
a susoended cellrng below should be dlvrded
intd aieas not exceedrnS 1000 square feet' Sec'
tion 3103.
131 Attics of combustrble materlal should be divrded
into areas not etceedrng 2500 (7500) square
leet. Section 3205 (b)
o4 132.Roof drarna8e should be conducted under the
oublic srdewalk. Sectron 3206 (e).
133.
\3
Overflow drains having the same size as toot
drains and on Indeoendent drarn lrnes are re'
ourfed. In I'cu ot li 5 :.'f ira.,/ scJccers tnree
times the srze of rcol (1r-:rns shculd l-'e rnstalled
in parapet walls. Overllow systgm snould have
inl€ts located 2 inches above the low polnts
of the roof. Sect,on 3206 (c)
,IL 134.The aecrecate alea ol penthouses and other
s[ruit-urei cannot erceed 33% per cent of
supporting roof area. Sectron 3601 (b).
roof
tne
o
i^ ^,ll' ? aIf#P{eH :: : :i1: ::i: ii ?"lfi [ I
Section 3801. This includes blind spaces en'
closed wholly or partly by combustlble con'
struction. U.B.C. Standard No. 38.150 (k).
Drv standoiges are requtred in burldrngs
more stories in herght. Sectron 330'1.
Wet standDipes are required as specified in Sec'
trons J5u5 ano Jdub.
Fire.ertinguishing system plans should bq sub'
mrtted to you to determtne compllance wrtn
3ppficable building, plumbing, and fire codes.
.EXTINGUISH'ING SYSTEM
FIBEPLACES AND CHIMNEYS
imneys should com ply with Section 3702.
Fireplaces and barbecues should comply with
Section 3704.
FINISH WORK
STRUCTURAL
tttu
I lJt,l"(
138.
u
r42.
144.
D
td-I r43.
vq
The interior well and ceilinB finishes should be
specified and comply with Table No. 42'B and
Section 4203.
Gvosum wallboard (interior lath and Dlaster) can'
ibt be instalted on weather.exposed surfaces.
Sections 4705, 47LO. See Section 4?4 fot deft'
nition of weather exDosed surface.
skylights should comply with chapter 34. Plastic
skylights are allowed only under the condttJons
soecitied in Section 5205.
Glass and glazinB should comply with Chapter
54. Type and thickness ol glass should be
specified. ,1'-r) aTATe <:t-r\4t '.-T,
Gfass and glazrng in hazadous locations should
comply with Section 5406.
146.
an aDoroved fa bricator.
147.Soil ctassification in conformance with Table No.
and -.........,--.....-......... pounos p€r square
soil bearing value used in desrgn should be
specified on plans. Sectaon 2803 (a).
Special insDection in conformance with Section
305 is required for the folJowing work:
(a) Structural concrete where the desrgn rs based
on an ultimate compressrve strength in ex'
cess of 2000 pounds per square inch
(b) All welding except where done in the shop of
The foundation investrgation report mentioned,n
olans was not included tn data forwarded to us
It should be submttted for revrew.
151. wood members may supoort loads from masonry
or concrete only under the condittons 5pecrtred
in Section 2510,
All masonry ot concrete elements reststlng selS'
mic forces should qualtfy as retnforced ele-
menls. Sectron 2314 (k) 3.
Precast concrete wall panels are limited to an
h./t ratio ot 36 (25). Section 2622 (t).
Slructural calcuratrons should be subn"rti?1 :')
lusirfy the adequacy of the StructurJr s'/s":-.
in resrstrng sersmrc and wtnd loads, and sup'
qoftfrng dead and live loads. This includes
foundations.
,TI
shcet N o.... -..5-.....o1........ F........ -. sneets
)
)
Installation of high strength bolts.
Prestressins work.oF a! Ri.;.{\.o &9 q'r,-D.a <-'.rl
I ir4s.ta)(j rl
I I 150.
ot4
i-/
153.'tii!?i:,':l::l:lt:lu :::::li *l: :: ::::
iI
t54.2t Roofs shall be desiSned for snow loads ot
....65............. pounds per square foot. Sectro'
2305 (c).
/hl//p'
155.The roof should be designed tof upltft wrnd pres'
sutes with due consrderatton lor lateral support
of compression flanqes of flexural members.
u
156.Floor load should ccnsrder a 20'pound pe'
souare foot gartrtion load. Sectron 2302 (b)
tf.157.Marquees should be desrqned for a 50'pound per
square foot lrve ioad. Tabie No. 23'A.
ls8.Garages for the storaqe of onvate pleasute cars
should be desrgned for a mrnrmum 2000'pound
wheel load. Sectron 2302 (b).
f,A
159.Live load signs are required. Section 2309. See
ttA
160.Glued-laminated lumber should be fabrtcated In
accordance wrth Sectron 2513 (c). A cenificate
ot inspection should be submrtted to you. Sec'
tion 2513 (e).
l6l.Allowable stress in glued lamrnated mernbers
over 12 inches in depth should constder a
depth reduction factor. Section 25f3 (a) 4.
i),
t62.Cross grain tension in wood is limited to approxi'
mately one.third the allowable stress rn shear.
Roof and tloor ledqers should be justtfied for
this tension resulting trom a 200.pound per
lineal toot horizontal force specrfied in Sectron
2313 in combinatron with dead loads. both
causing eccentric moments,
ill
163.Bolted connections exposed to the weather are
limited to 75 per cent of the allowable load
under Drotected conditions. U.B.C. Standard
No.25.1711 (c).
il i'r t6/.Anchorage of concrete and masonry walls should
comply with Section 2313.
0l/r65.Plywood grades should conform with Table No.
25,C.
166.Justification is required that sufticient slope or
camber is available to assure adequate roof
drainage after long trme deflections. In Iieu of
this, roots must be desiqned lor posslble
pondin8 of water. Section 2305 (t).
tl i
L67.lils on stressing method and hardware along
Flh justifying data are required on prestressed
concrete work. This data should be subnrrtted
and approved prior to orderrng of mateflal.
Note that all tendons should comply wrth Sec'
tion 4303 (e) 3. for fire'resistive purposes.
ott
lo6.Welding data or details for steel decking use.l
a diaphragm should be provided lniormJtro,.
should comply v/rth a spectfic ICBO researcn
recommendatron or test data submrtted In com'
Dliance wrth Sect ro n 106,
ai
169.Details should be provided on rocf (floor) dra'
phragm connections that indicale how the
shears are transferred to vertrcal shear'reslstrnq
elements. Connections should be justrfred wrth
Structural calculations tor compliance wrth al'
lowable va lues,
170.Nailing for gypsum board (lath, sheathing board)
used structuraily on shear walls should be
specified and comply wrth Table No.47'1.
t-I
t7l
q
Shear walls utilizinq gypsum board (lath. sheath'
ing board) cannot be used to resrst loads rm'
posed by masonry or concrete walls. Footnote
l. Ta ble No. 47.1.
Railings should be designed to withstand a 20'
pound per toot horizontal force. Sectron 2304.
l/<'
r 73.Ceiling ioists should be desrgned for total load
of not less than 10 pounds per square foot.
Section 2304.
(k
t7 4.Interior partitions should be justified structurally
lor strength and deflection critena specrtied In
Section 2312 (b).
I with a specific ICBO research recomrnendatron
or iustifying test data should be submrtied In
comDliance with Section l.06.
r /b.*=.on""l f : I"T ii ;l l"J: :,,S"'r"rtg (or i. c o n c rej{
'4 I'PIans should indicote that foundations exterrd
below the frost line.
178.Provide complete specification in conformance
with the design for
ldditional Cortectiotrs:
thr3a thr.tr r,. . Patt of thr pl.nr and th.ll tam.rn .ntch.d th.r.lo.
Rechecked and Approved..... ..... .....-..,.-.-......,,..., ..
Oato..............,....
lcrrn 200.3
Corractionr r! rbova indicatad will bt comDliad with.
D)tsIcN ntlvll':\'l I}OARD
DATN OII MUITINC:
MEi\IBERS PRISENT:
SUBJECT;
ACTION TAK]IN BY BOA
MOTION: ,,
VOTE: FOR:
SUIIIIlAI]Y:
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
ABSTNNTION:
,/
APPnOVED I L/
DISAPPRO\IIiDl
/b8 a
: -""-
i\-
i: \.--
fbr
j' s?"
ll rrJ 'r ,, $-\rf
il$uil
il$[n
:j ilt .r
il\UtS
1?
l: r\
\{ ,\i
\d\
\
tt\\!S ,a-l
r.n l'. \lka $s
**,- lh rN -.lr_
s
R
-'1..5
-{r.
$l\
\-
\
\
ll
a \
\9
N \b rcr S
rt ll v\
\t.t\
|).r{'
\
r{
ll
s \c{-i
lr
\\
o
\ !'l
o()
a{
sI
\*
\
t\
t()
l1
j
,. 1 'ry1
E;
e:;
AJ
n
r(
\
rl v \l
$l
t.9
NI
<\
+
-.- I
cro
t. :*ai *
I -^ +il .*\l*- lll i\*i,{ lli ; 1 lll o f illi: €I ili i sR
?o'ili i-s-\i lll R { iilir q,g tilll i r*i iil ,i\ a
lq* il] :*,, ii | . ili \:i s\,: '; rll "i\*.-. $
l-- lii i=tlrli
l"^lFr-f-I " iiis*ri *ijlil
ie-.111-- $l---:^f ii I ofi*
\\\
tl A
><
T{
\.-'
tl
-<-
I
I
I
I ,t
I
l I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j t'1l t,I,t'll
l
:f-t
0
-l
sl
-z
0
o
.\l
$
1i ,--l
I
,l
I
I .il
,I
{,1
tJfsl'
rOl -j q$ui
\=j
.ni rnl
ttl I 'i r,l -\|!+l
Q:
n
L
.\l)\i
t
f i; ,, !)o o
^
fr-,td
V. t' /')r,i, ,' r>- 1.'r " | ,t?.r,-
p"u)lL p'uy( ' -..\
fi?aoe VLF*4
f q Ysnrs @44
__ _dho__+
tnrsr
N= ,2ltl x-rr/rr
X. 210,1
/\ z xtl /1iI - fi 379 '
lr= 4,olg Ve i
. IDf/q
uL!/ tr4A@+',0
EICL
fr r per. e, raiirc, i F nz'*rlqil
"t"ifr'
i
l/€.r;ttu-lrtrE, narJ|'ltilf i IY^!',"]eW2l--"--l
llrt['*t*ttt> ttr ,)rt* $qq
---J
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ...,l
I
I
i
I
--. -,1
i
I
i
I
l
i
I .l
N.
\l
rD
I
I I
I 4r t,tt
n a MaiNllile U- | Ai'a:-ce"'_N*,-!* q)Lifi'i
nf{ ITKNEK-)
tfr,l'-rt"
o
-
REIIIF;
a \ /-M =(a)(,03)lz\=,'u :'' '\'J
4
l(. z[ ,i
r,,.r'o-*l y#f) O6
i"
N . -- t,w G) = l,o5
k-rr
,1
Mp -r ol,5/ o,k'
ff -'s
,rA
''9&]'3ff,'
3,7s(*) = ( '25
#4 @ /b'
P/ atz"-
i:.,r\' ,,1;rr''i-1. r ;' z''.')
[l' tSl .V ,,..1.r,y:-..
lats,
tu:
r\
:"fr ,(f,flSN,!ufi .;itU; Ier ao'-:i'i hi p.]LD'I4 -*.toi Lrt'dJ,;e{)
lor* ue*1,nr,J ( tAEeT b- ?4
luf4tr t 1t-ou
/:ltC?--
n
i!, o,e*e, utrte*, { itzdA x}1i
ll, *c4''r * LTl tt<E,' d!-ar.lt l'il11
'rvAt,u, t L'ffg/p lrt czl
,
|-,cJ4la*,\O ttl J crr*hq4
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers
CHKD. BY- OATE
cuew Pr4, F,S rrnet
PHONE 13031 444-1 95 r
ev r lXf oott ,orr /1"35 J sHEErNo / *"ilrhea
ee,orccr LtoilS9;;4tl P/,@ lE eaeuu.
n
C//t/ C, H6,/C€/e - l/E)lft toc, €D
/ ,., -
a1= J,23 + fl/fu = 3.08 KLF t I ryt
tit,1r7= 3,0t (t,gi) + ,Z 0,Y) ' ,5,06 Ettr
L= g:gt ,lr^
., = , orf ;r/g = ,{0,, k-r, l=u',WM,X,' c'uoL oJ /I L ' ltr8 p-,0027
As= ,4g+i*^ ' unT z-#€r T+ ts ,4r-,bzo{'
4. ttLps I
ui,, 6,iay,o)/toXty,,l = /oB 7sl i', -
Ar= 5o(t{01/5P= '6762 da #s a /o'r J'"(,
ow
-
i
CHKD. BY- DATE
FHON E (303) 444-t951
, LATER4L
SHEET NO / OF LO4TA
PRELIM. -.---
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, lNC, Consulting Engtneers
av JXq DAreoEc 28//a
'!J":,
c,y1jff P, E, F,S.FINAL n
r/oor
n
W///D / ttSr-wesr
,:
D/,eFcr/04
csl '
2t,55
USF 25 PSF
K
<_t,..
j
,, , /4,7 ''
ri
I
l.n''o:
/ "l ( Bogs etQ'D= 4tty' gotr@zl/ 74Ru )u4tL
es,8E /ao'216ytxtc" /387rt/,uirts nqb.a/,,uA/Ls @ 4"
n
E t,I JOHNSON-VOILAND-AReHULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers pHoNE(303)444-re5r
ev t Q oneprc.tp,,* $sr th85 ) sxeerHo 2 orfl|fift
n
CH KD. BY- DATE
wrilt>/ tvo,er,q- s0url D/PEQr/o/u,
uftbs/ifrF;AoE
PRELIM.
Ff t{AL /r/
?.zB
r-
4 - ilo Ptr
'06 y7p;57 tfl(Lo
l-!:/*8,5
JOtb
17, I
?7'1,
57, l
t8, b
18, 6
55,78
?1,8!
ti:
rz?,? 6
I
.21 'f n0
q,5!:
,78 t.F
?126
',,,
a&
,L3
x,/5,6
/,BE
,t */&
r*1
f\uoL %"'/ ,2€to tuL?D€R -lcrurtrED >RA/E p/fvs q7t/
o1 7oa.f - 6r'iu/ t'"o. "4t/. TrP/ClL.
pRorEcr 1tt\/,/cq-'14 Co/1.)0c P/;;'4SE rT
JoHNSoN-votLAND-oofrLETA, lNc, consulting Lng'ine
FINAL 4
-UFJ- P-74:::-t
,tEV/ (-d^I 17till |/'/ 'ik^l ;
144',".
PHON E (30 31 44{-i9sl
n r. i-SHEETNO F OF I,/
PRE LIM.
lt/:1..,n'1"
UP
/r,tP
dlu'/
DL t( (' 1" ':. f
LL' l4'7 t "'r'-1ta1 ;t' I 4)
t!
I .-t \$l \
{I
",'i,1"' I t:"i'
;.,,t tZ37zf
.f -i
T
|RA///f to/0 ,
bo/ tnlorr,t/,
247 PS F
/L/7 PSF
'r n /<'r/
7,75 "
,/arE
tt/a zF t/
ly' rprr.
4 nr,./
/-7,p,s 17
q r,e,ftrt
(u
| ?,t,t j,i
w- ....
tl
I !
'^,
1(,' .t,"a (,'-' ,!t"' . ',r)t/'l r . . \
i.f,.:,(, t.t . 7"t(,'::i..t.'l )',rrt '
\ cp,:-. !.: )
A'l
ll=
],
'J/ti I
L'o.-t t IP r\
i
i__
Jr
t ^'i
1, "1
t<l.F k1-..(t tyli;r ,, ,'
/'"; , -'r1.,
'A r r t'i,
^ ''n ?,(nol
fI,, E .', ,,.,,
Iit
,il ,
t-l' 1'f i' '''
/,1 ,'.,' /ln'/
7'l L.t r -rr
t ,;: tt /
Sttf* ttr'
i
4-,4
/,5.- /,7€
, 3cs t<
E't t
t.,i,::;
-,r'l'
l' tt 0r':f tr/
:1<r'/
15h.o
euJll oercD,lt-P,/'lih nat, /195
cnxo.JrTcA rar, //+Jn enotecr /J0//:'1.1/^ f't'l'':;!.:' i'ii''"-' if
t. n/ i:),'ax/, I C LIENT
u/Ek'a).E - - -
'\i llCt t tt::
's Ll8
, r la.th.4 t- - -;:t
n
PHONE (303) 444-1 95 r
SHEET NO /4 OF P, I .
PRE LIM.
FINAL t/
(./t,t 1 t)/l/) t=/crcR=/,50 i)il,/11//// /04 1)t' .,',41Y
.. l'f0 /,/ !:,,n, ,, .9',' DR07:St6.O
'l "f Ft-1 /\ ,-/l/ tt'7F
BFIM
ttylyENrs 4r B// d
OF
(
I
\
l
,l .,;tSir,q) r tgt,
rr :il::),,Mro".!nd --/,r7 n-F'
g(,i'') | - 3)t5"
n4,-F1d1 | +q,b'/
,i,'t1,;tt, | " 1t"55 +3,3/ +/, 655
:,El'/rt | -t0.6 zt,l
| ,t',2
/-/u | ,r., -;'/ ;n'i +/z-2
Mru,tan',/ 17,3( 17'r/ lt,5:i:.i ';i
:," I a,aEs" 6,ti" e .75'/
//"1: 't,t | , , r,
', t 'ot 2c , Pt't (/l
6{--ffi'*l {l ib stl
$,1-{,'o+ a{ 'ltt+iti zo / l,oz' 20 /
r,,.p(r)l tt 3/ ?l
,. '"/s ({r' ;t, I na [ ,7L (t '/1" /)
l-q/, , , I t,?/i tt J7 h'3'/
ti,r,/f{:.+,t /?,(,/ /3,7 /t/,7t'r'
Mu ntf l'81
o,t1 6:r: ', zib'
'tr.;/t/l,i1 l.:rl t 1t'/6
Fs,;lfrrrl,) qo. s i,'= i r,B ,
,11,t.,,,",',1 ,,-lrl ,/B /tt
)
\
/'
I
fl2
-%
/u,
+!,1 /
'2a,/
'.iift.nt)
-//,rt
,=flt.r r/-,!; " /'2 2
- t0'B
/3a t
' (Jo ()!/ //t4 F lt /.-q 7 i;"t tShf
t2.S 2,
'tt lr-r,${
U ttil
I
t+vul
Ir
fcr/
Fu
k-Fr 34,0' ot
JoHNSON-VOILAND-nQrur-rrA, lNc. Consulting Ensine(l
evJXA oarc /t-7-7L :oar /("3li
6HKD. By-DArE
-
pRoJEcr L/0,'/.lii:i/' c2,,/n):") - Pflti)f IL
L'S /:
\
\
l
I
1
I
cuew F. fi. F,!;'
J OI-IN SON.VOI LAND.ARCHULETA, INC.C on s u l I i ttg l:,ng t ne e rs PHONE 444- ! 951 t30
OF
/tz7/,
av /zn oerc /,:/z/l)
CHKD. BY- DATE
--
Jhni
A
t.
,l
I,L
1/LTrtnrlrt'- FAr- tl a
1=
JoB,n //-tq< O sHEEr r{o .-"
pR1JECT L/n/ /:- , ,/t t ) Ct1y' lL..'-',: l t l/\. L .llr- pRELt t.
-
clretr 7-, P.l ', f-.1 FTNAL -
€/,1 /E' LAI/L.,/t/G /-211 /1:-q' ltllal- (*=tart (:'a:At4 FoL S:11'5- t.n'."." '/"r)
/ttt/or,,//r = /7Sr+r(24 {t-+\ ,/t 2 41/Tzr- : -Lzz,/',--
l4*/r{ C/i.T S-/,/:/t/f.)u::,. = /7-< " r (( -
/'17t!t
I /! r'
Y
' 1;;-,7.-,7'1-7 ,l
Aj,-,,1. i , /-7: (',.-7 l' -.\r/t \7-.t
. /77o Lt-. .
.c 7{ lzr
Srsc (r,s7\ = /2gr7 y.7-7s
'- /z ,g /1 -t: t"
= /53.i1 1e - y,l
/.' 67s(7,7i, 1t:-.t .1.t,i': rl\ .2
+ /f7o ( ,\ ' 44'l(,1'
V: . */s*' 54o t - (75x -,-t
| ' '--" t'/ '1t.t\l' ('(-r-nttr:-
.,i'!,. -- /: /i-'. -- /z'/-<{ -/.--
.: /
U' x=i'(- /
il6 = StSt Fr-L4
,'i -/: ,t' l.tt : L ' (tt
f 4s i'r,o,.s
I tn
''\t,7/ taa ) t \./
/,b /--=:
r,o./--\i ri -'
"lr( /-: I ,,,-.
'/l
n
u5e
L' ,tlUrrr-fer .<LAti,
lvl."tlt
4t! (ro':"
8o ('5,s)"
P = ,cnl?
= .?(L .i/ 7
z -'sS Ttty.
-t-E'( 1," L " "l- s,5o' (
/ss.e (ro)'
t-( i,izg- = /?8
A, = ,oo31(//,szs) e
+/z r:rlr.s)
7!8, 7L+ fir1r6uD €DG€r;
7.1^7,/'-'./7,33= /,o1-S /
,o.14 r/,742 i( l:,.,)=
.r,4 4(tre=)Z oiY
3.4/, H-FT ' */.{ p -a/
3,iz t, -r,i-* :e,9.5 f'-./4,r
*x=
n
/, //,/s //1/Al, /.ttt/r. A, - ,oa-,Syflo)(S'= ):' .2zo
J o HN s oN - vol LA* o,-1u, LErA,
ay FcA D^rE /L /7 /7(- roB ' -PROJECT
f NC. Consulting Enginee,
to,4.L"tl (
"lb
Cot fi"')1
I 7 surer ro 4 or
7I/rt',1 F! enrrw PRELIII.
PHONE (3031 444-1951
C LIEIIT
CHI(D. BY- DATE
n Tfa,/ 5,1
fpE TEklE /3, ,oata(*/s,s) ;.4t< t/-lz r ea,vvlt{
g4e /-,,L/^7,
ll:,t;
CAst sterilGap:us 4t+ 6)80 bt/e,F
1//€cE {SatlrV .glet\l ( e' ,4 fliptr. s(//)/'b/:7
(= 4/41 -,0</'37fl,"\
-tr, 3.&t /ls{,es) e
!1:81 k-
,6d( a, k,
-
n
J O HN SON -VOl LAND-AilULETA,
BY lY oare!2:Z:fu-- nto
PHoNE (3031 4'14-l tst
CHKD. BY- DATE PROJECT
sxrer ro 7 or P' T,
PRELIiI,
n
AT EKIEQI?R- udttl 'r,l/t- Ftc>37 EtuLl
n
VrrnA L
Nrrnt
lVpne
4rta,l
Ftne /lYlt
arsqto.
4---Jt - q 4=
d
yl z/-n ,
I
-,tl
{8
-----..-'=
9<2'E b r-rr
'hqy /<'Fr
.{""*- *
- r/r{
ft1rc-c7'
),,.
rq.0t'
i.r7.
1 on*-Ff
1,25't
- 26,.9 r
l'26')
/^'
JOHN SON-VOILAND-ARAIIULETA, INC' Consulttttg L,rrglncer-'1
et .l[fr. oarc /z- r,-/F] JoBlt !hi:2-- . Q
'HKD.
By- DArE
-
pRoJEcr Lt0,+'^,, Et"ll cl),il!.)?l -/X)4SE-E
PHON E (3031 444-1951
SHEET lio , O? li i
PRELtttl. _
|,r''cr-terrr 4 F ITIA L
/-,
6 / rtt ';/l lLF Au)/Y L L 0lC
6
7 0,2
/''r'l
.,.
//u 4at/7/a/T0 t2l'Zt! 0/f towtttP
/ st'EFr
rrrL
ll,L
V rrAL
DTA L
fus{irot
tu /n/'/
Vrar '
;/{fpeas
F. E,// ,
-n
{ rof
lert
frqt k,t I
Irn ftro/
il at/
t: .: ttt'
,1,1'-"
lr'
-
tl\
*-NI!'yl;iiI
,tpo ,at// ptril" a/'/.,1 oyt,
T, e (,2&)-lZt,i = /4n/ 4- Z,
t,TF t, (.t/tlTt)/,--\t1r7-' 3,'tl:t' ,1-
-LJ c 1r/l/r su/r?r/.a
= "/or,o'14,pc # 5 x20''CO
. t i "l ul/-- il ',,' Fn,T !;
2
,r'i ,,ttr., r i :f )1,U,b' i znt
3r(L' 4/'f;.,.41 V,0l */,1"
/|.| _ ; 7. t'!; (tt /t:""..,i!,,..'. :
202^/t,'fttVr ilz
I z,bbo ,1, 6,i't 2.+
iil # )r,'z iq) ut
i
- aF,t.j)itn,t tt^,0 ' l/.', t7,l ln.h7, i
. .: .\,t/-5'j,! t?.C17 ;.!.,- :..t ?,rr-l h{,7,t - :1t, | -!0,5i t,qag,j j1:i.
t'/5, +, J;:i ', +abl\
t*+rfi| "i,u lie+tqn/t.tjh _/qj4t). illtrr,, - ",/ -2
tzTg ??.i {b: ///b <1 "',t
"/'---.. li'):(z3zf;irl 06f . .74 -!;'- --'En;( d nt/,t st.p.t/s2i' ' "";+i "''Y,3 - -
.t// ),1n q ll
a4+'rl \
'/n' r7:tt
n
J O HN SON -VOTLAND-AUIULETA,
BY T(11 D^rE /2,/3.ii','-v roso /'(8s J
Consttlting Engi*f tNc.
,i \,I '^r
/"
/#* -4*<-4:7 -"-"-
@tt l*1 /t;a.' /7 .-
PHONE {303) 44il-19s1
sneer iro / or
::-'
CHKD. BY- DATE PROJECT /trtaL.., i1.;t2 a'r /t-oi PRELIII.
C LIEI{T FINAL n
JL .vte /rl/Bh/ (trt.(i:
/4lstr! , C/ a/rr.
F/-@"-. t-Sa/r.f u
@ /,, nr'/t t-
tll /., 52 4/rr
7 lL or"t':e
/.52;r' =
n,|5t't'(A' ;,"'1:a;7
v:'/Ji3LrS'-,4 v)r/tt- (-or t L)' tVg4/rf '/-
/;lb
(oa
..7 ,o83 tn/
a): /.tz
/Z;.: ,/r /+--,ttG ,-- _-:'
/6/ t,t/
/za4 /p;
- . /:a3,"t
-t=;-_-T
-r/
7 L.: Jf)
Ttf tLlE/Jr) t,,'
IJ
t\
k06 , ,/4-\.,,.
n?/-a5x
t-t\-
-,/ / *5'?- Y, 4 / '
z\.4 {(, /7s ) ('--'t i'
- \./ .184 (v?./ot )(/08 )- '\ _/\ ,,/
( !g ;7ytt/t t./e-'./2,8 rr- - JE--r :;t)/
s.(,zto\(sd1 ..1
-€e 60o g+(t1 roa) z
| ' Z9,a) ..,,t / rL(a,D.
r- attn (J' /LIPF .' , 3 j {'!/FT
-/
(n1O
r\
.- / -- --\r . r-td > (, _': s, )\6t-,/
#4Gq,/ol)e)
A>
Z. 57.4,^/ + In[ e y' zo
PHONE (303) 444-1951
OF SHEET iIO
PRE LIM.cHKD. BY- DArE
-
PRoJEcr y'-/r't/'t ? /)u ( h/ /1h3
CLIENT FINA L
/otJt:S: {rH".S/|zr-a 3fD = ,6;;'l' /r.F 2'<tD '. i',-5',,ii:')-r
/r!,(fu'r- / !r;f-':,
,)v/t:r',' 5ky'1 /6tliZ ;
' (/ 4/p7, r ,'o r't1q ' eruJi'r,
/,1= (to ( s't7)' / E = €'73 a- rr
apa;/€3 'd') 'l/H f' :.,,'''-' aa/i./ '.,2-g t,:t7,"'7\
7k/ -( - I/( ; /; =/€ 7r'r ?' t':; {
..,.t,2 ,-- /.
! t,/tt !.i
578{L L/^/12:Ls
la/)u
@.7e
t G9!41'! 8.r-7(12\*-t
i J*ze , /gS,/ tu4
/attartr ///sbV tJ Jilrl"r/ ,', i:' 7.33'
68,78
L'I
,t: - .tn-[
Lt
(n(tzt)"/a
'
'i'
.,. .,1., ..t
:\-
zxe.e
-./ ..1
., ti
.'.'r,t ri
. tt '4-- //'- /1J
Wtz
a3 2
)
i
f- .14 g{.u:X 7'=}I,: t)
=.i1a7(.z7,pt) A
/,-, )t t7 |
'i' 14 s(0o\ ! 681 -iq-(:l/t,'')t -88 ,t&
tq
.,(z
'7t7,,
:Y
(:- ,47,,,coa
LlLf ; il ,1tzE
trWcAs7 LttttE-L:IA
, ll , rt-/ >,.-rr)' 14.1 !-r+' ,'1.-4nl-r:
/(f ,1,r4117)
,4( l,Szs)'
/,57 (r,o
:-/L
-!l rt, T" f
. .' ,' ' ''", ; 't|7-'.). , -:/ t,.
).?
n
Consulting Engineers
PB I<
n
J O HN SON-VOILAND.ARCHUIETA, INC.
BY J\ q oare //'2>'7L lolr /A 3
cHKD. BY-DArE- eaotect L/?il''HE4/ C0t/|)9 *
Ar c7/u///YS s ulWW? srA/R iltAR L 0 t
Consulting Engineers PHOIIE (3031 444-1951
/ D*
SHEET r{0 (z OFl, /r
PRELli,l.
Fll{AL ,-/
I
7l'- (,) 3t- ii
2t!8
F
BAUICE
v
qu.
,4 AE A^401/E Dp.
'ii*-4|:f
/r L0,409.
t( ,(-tl'l
t/.2
{t
5,5" 5tt
-
n
JOHNSON-VOILAND-AREHULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers
o",\'y'C norll'2a,-//a ro'o /h,l/'; a av J'/E oerctl-2:'-/D na* /htl.li- *
PHONE (303) 444-1951
ij'7 sxeerto .? oF l,//
6HKD. BY,
-.
DATE
-
1aglEg1t t tJ' :' r' 4'f c0 t't: ')1 r//'4 \'F 'U PRELTM' :'
-
cuenr /) r:, € E s, ,rnot ts
--7-" 7
I ef w//L q' c\L M ',1,s47'1-
t/tlF-@'
I
I ro,ot"t n /'
l';-,-/27'| '6r''' "u | ,"'
fuorr"ttt | -zes nf / qY | ,,./
l^r, rolrsi ,q//,'/ frly,F cg frrcQ"l'*r,r{uqo,t,7 po,if /oo,/s
lrQ I tBBT,stl' | ,,'
l,7rr | /qB'gt I I l; | ,,8" | ,^"
I lr^u'*|*/ I rl)P' I l{,*o I '/sz - t+ ls u l
lk;*,,
1:, 'rb ,1t tF:"'
I l-.,-^-.r1,:,^,1 lilllt:Eront -,yl),..s// ox
I
I lrr,. ', tt t,l 4 i\g) -t 38
I
l{ur,l,,^'
l, 'r/5 /1,
rt4
|
I i ,"/
vJ" ncttL'w EE"'':E: flt/xittp 10r'6'rz"
li,:"ll
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHONE {303) 444-1 951 JOHNSON-vOILAND-nfluatrn, lNc. Consultins Ensinel
nn av JY7 oarc /t-23-76 :rre* ft85 sxEer ro i or fl / '
.**o.6r-DArE
-
plorEcr///,4/qlJE'!n cn//,:.1/)+' /hi't'-tpRELtM.---__---
cuew p,E F,S, flxat L/
A"r t,vllL 0N LtNE
a/,gzFtF/rt+J53=,21j
xcr
-',1{O rro IW
r$r
/4u { Aapt
//t/E (9 ,
It- t 4!.8//,P'
T- -;,;,- -
lt | :::,s 1 ) 'Ji, ,ft ,,i;i _ {
R+uLr./ i | ,z'17 |
iitttif/ t t t,i ,.e! ] krF | ;i7i *t *-
|'a,ttlt,,ru ul , /,g7 r v |
"'ihl, "r, I
t/rrar. i, )biiz"r ,, I I
t rurt=lt ,
,,),/ . t/iz { t,ll':"ro1
I r-trr ',rL,lzlr/sr3tl' I i f/,1 1 32'*'/'s i ttiP I r" :t 554 i72- ttl
I
,,,i,/rl rfir,/' y''/ n,ar,t, &/b" \ f',iijil!' I
srr<A7l/0 .t)4/Tfr2N J /c.F f/41f 8/911 F7i T/f/c/L EXfA'c/0f
t.h,i-- .; . /,/,//,:ti,, ,.,e q:.nrI.;l,lr_"!if;r"rf :;f!,:::l,r,
t): us9 9,4rltr /',^7',ti::/'.i' '4r-: 17 L/,4/te/)lY// I 0,4 t//YF
JOHN SON-VOILAND-AryULETA, lNC.
w J )'C D^rE //-.;'3 -'/ (-- ns t /A I 5
Consulting Engineers o PHON E 13031 444-1951
', .. 'i'
SHEET O 4- OF / ,; /
.HKD' BY- DATE
-
PRoJEcr l/")'(ii]"
cugrn P n
I't'/ LL oil t/'4'.F o:nt4trt Ry' f?/ t. "rr',41' /.),' :)/,2.,v''.
z,'!*
FINA L
IT
,7|'J: '1.( h r' I r,4 :"; h=0 i',.'r__*- _ '-- |
ti
r1'
,/,L/ED
/t-1
k 'tf (,2' rL
I 5,7 4' ul
o\1
LO,4LC
tt 't
2tl g
/00
Y't lF
lP0nt
254 0
torlL
AtO nef
t#fl?,urt, 17sFSF * 's (r'f topf)Nty'.rca t /79/"5/' f '3 (/'/l!ufl/f,) i I ;.
t lpns /,,,,: t,:l;,Tl!::,A I\"!;,:;, *,1',,;,",lhl, i,,/,ny ' I,^t,.-,'^ ., 'oi'Lc,fOy*dtj'!{,'
;;'. gv,7 4 'i'E / 727 u0 M,7 5-:)
F/,4rr"r, '!D rri ^*,,r",r/{r, ve ,t:i ot';:t///4ulo
M
,',sr \i,!oi,! r,rrnr
a24r + /Y//t,'
f^
p r, l .lil ,,
1
,, ; I o')n ' 3,6t," .., ,,..- /.((' .
F,E,tt, I C'/+t',r,lzzr I f^, .t|r' 7^5r 80x (!'r
I l-/Jit/tl tlr'll I anot'd " 3'bb" 3'nt't
-t4 wl I I r u,6/ z4,hl il 'A' ,i: ze i't ; 'r'Ap; 7 6;6;
p.r, | ,ill , r | ,-' I I a. ,-,,,,1 '. 3,66," .,, ,,.! /.(/'
+r/r),/( | 12,17^-" .".,1 /,1-t
illnrt l"u(r,.tf .t1,0 "" I il nt.tr. I ' es',t 7,0
{rrr,Ull /t= -//+ ?8
| I J 5i,, | liq,L rrnp,all dt= -//+ ?8 ll I 5i', r/5.1]L
I 'i;;;::r, -ltt, uE vt ll',,,n' '20,0/6,0
I :" ':,:l i 'ilct: ll :.,, z,o 2,,a
i iorfofir' | ,i no-e - qi?- (,tq ll n ?,$ - /8,0 ft,n i
qr*; ra!, l,i --2.;y lQjt) gS il *" ,. |j +q/ +i,'' 7. /!,',
l' (r*truo, --ri'c.ar oz l|,f;,! -.,\ :lii 'lil
_,'iil, !.',,,11!./{aD F/ Acf [ 'lt t " (\
o /z , llr'1p 7r,r.t, ': { 1t7g -ty '- ' t03l t.' ' t : 'Y: ''
,>' 0 v
- 40,8
^
JOHNSON-VOILAND-AeiULETA, lNC. Consulting nnsin{
JoB# 1635
eaotecr t//lilgilE/lt) (ttni'),') - '/:"i):ir.:,E J2!
, l//F
ev .lXy' orre
CHKD. BY- DATE
pEr,ttCEt)
q,\/t)/rY 4/ t'C
orTo/:pnl
lpr{ ft,t c.
SHEET I{O
PRELIM.
PHONE (303) 444-1951
z- or P,T'
tl FII{AL
A
q-
(l
\t{i'-------;.*i - a!.Ia14lE*srl!:l!gzi_ -Llt'ilqil 1,. /'t
t
Y.
\\
,,/\ ('{if,,) ,tohi,'
.i) \ ,^' | ,,, .t.fr /,7/'.\ \ f,4,.,, | -zt 1lz1,t
1,, lq*r,l ',# filfui i11
'5 ( ,!ry,t 'i ,'1,1,,/,,,i | 'ii,.tru) r'nft ilt
\ \ ,'t*nf '1 lil:'",
'"'i,fr,,'
t/,1,/
ir /li | *i,i ;*i
":!,:l fli "1, | :,1/^ i1.' ilt'
:,1 lJ;,'/: | +;:: ,1f f+?{"l'ifir ) :1,.
I ri,rnri,,rt,r11 'r;l:,1 |" I 'q'3
\ Ar,,ul,l ,/iit'l ,tl
frs ' t I vl,'F, | /1.i
Ar,,uil ,fit;l ,tl I .J.
I: ,.- ",^ | :];1i
il ttt ny
F1on'
F/A
t't)u'i)r,tt.
j'ttF'
Le i4 , ''- u ,,7.|'
nnx.:ll't
,|':)if I
M ./-
hoP
I
A:S qF
laoTrtkt
r(ptl,: ti)
,))rrr).'lt
-l(-t -:'ttt =' / h /
ly aunY'.ttl
t'i / ,t/'i'^zti -/t5* /0(/ /'5
,,L
1al
5;g7'7 0'
,2i"'
7,6,1'" ::"" r'''''l
tJ
- i't / *
-'' I t(y
t -ri'// - /,b?
.uJ,.t, tt/-,.1 o.' v-^
-! 7_,-.a\",,otr.t <.y,, :
tt- ,lo9't.,: Flil'' ssl stt ,qi' ( ,,!!Ar, '_5+ :,:
,?',''J
)'-,,1'!:(,i,t:NF kL ttl
.- /- n, I " t,17
S ( tru bo eli | --T.l/ur\ | -_-!+
i'r I ,{, o,tt liill '"'f
$ i I ')i,P';S I ,tf (./if
{ / P;' ?ilq
*
\\:,,;,',.-'.:'ll
r,tt:rY/ttc..4/ EXTE{I/:', lL:iL, i lrrP
L'.fu */r, ,r' "15;-or crt!, 'eEi.,/-"r/r/L'sE f'A/7f.e/,/
ii::/i-r:'r!'/'r -
cLtEttt ,/', l=,,. F.|,
/lVfEE )0/<
BY'/X
JOHN SON -VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC,Consulting Engineers PHONE (303) 444-1951
,or, il\V, jL,O
CHKD. BY- DATE
o^,- n
o'r lfit
P Ro r Ecr lJi t/ S I : ffi --e oy' l!)iS PRELIM.
FINAL
efro EVEL L/I/E
t:-LA.el.- .-lp*.4(XtQ=
"l
tctc L^E T
^ O'/ /
- )zl Z -11.4 ' Qzt<u=
t o'u
..
.)!lJ
0
736''
-l,vl
ar./
20.8
,t,
7,)tr
K
t1
BTI'' ,
t,0
'.4. O
,0
l,b
2,6
-73 .0 t)
O//tflE S{A ^l tl,
aq//q
-20,1 t0,3
7.V
'u!
-/2,2 22,1
,b9# rt
nlWpt
7 - n{ril4x ,,v tlLfl'-/
L//1!)
i
| | AU)
a c'3 lr u 4l
?\,fi6(26'J):1V
i
rJX
l
.
' 'f rtq!
Al "-mlw
I
,gt,ktE
C LIEI{T
11t/"b3 (4,y/)=n,0/
rOE ?NX
+/40il:
' * litx ufilFT
-/y=21,/F'T sx=1.0/1,,3
9t Fr
'23.,#t'ff st= //,7
usF tu l0 x /,5
usE wl0 x//,5 @', -r1',8Y(11"zrl, ' /?,7 rFr
.tz U t,l
usE Ylt2x/6
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARqHULETA, lNC. Consulting EnSineS
ayJlA oercNll/,2trt :rls* /b89",
cHr(D. By-DA'E eaotecr Lt0//3"it''/'0 c0llD99 ,l',+f3'sfr
PHONE (303) 444-1951 . c/tFt( 0A/
Sxeer tO 2 gp 5 .':'5
PRELIII.
r^cuew P. E F,.9't,l Ff NAL u/
D )L:VEL 2 0R 3 : Df PqsT/0 tullfr/9
- 't '/,rz0DfL,z' 8'31^5 L 7z.z;/7 tlst w/0 x//,,y'
(qr){,r,;ile,F7,4/ar L8,35 (t/z ,
ull4r tr cnL 7D / -nr' f,ft1tl/tultl ,?e/!;E-
MnesAr. ,tr cot /) ' [rft)TJ/.r]!:ti
//,yo"o-.low,v / , B,3nr' /< t .
Ru/t/F/ 4T 7D = 3,3/,f .=,y'/t,Z ' ,25 /< u.,o.ar/try ,27,0'of/u.u(,
turuw!- wil ;,
t'/f i
t,n*lt//tr:'tl i
LrrVE
Fy'
VS Ex=
clttct
lssLt//a (/PL/Fr HttX. # *Ttquf Brc /
WE8 }T/F4F/JEES AT CCIS:Pq/= e'/.7k nM o/ *(tni, */
/ss(//vE 7//17 4LL raFFRr\E. C)L L?c//7/p/',/s T0 /l/ //F ///FE sr/Fr.n *t/. 6.//t =.t f (,/,9D = !,.1'4l - .p(n'ro)/,ar.1 )/a': rl,,5..-,2il(zi 2.r_)-,/72 / /" 12 - ,lr,gE ftisrm= /i,t7rs( Enrr- /J,/7Lr5)0,8) =
Y/'
f*nJ 'Y't1aXzt)= 2/,94 fit-
,r.lg ot, .za(ad)=ZZksl tl|
!/'7 =
,ft(?+t j)
,qil ,//,3 t
^o,t / or,1 (lm = th? tL // aci ok- .
. /r,j <
,/s(6"t +75)
sr/FFEl/.ARS ,/Pf ,<8pb ,
n
Bylxq ,o',rfuz+l)o'r //85 .. .:-^a sxeerro/
'HKD.
By_ o^rE ___:_ pRoJEcr utUJ\,, Fll: C.f /),aS ,o4,tg--{pRELrm._
FINA L
VERT/CAI" LOAOS O,V -PIUPS.
Il*,j,
zK b@/+
^xre/6'
4y6A/2"
1,57 '
? J7l
?,571 /700 '17/ r<si
,572
,38 t
J O HN SON -VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.Consulting Engineers
C LIENT
PHON E (303) 444-l9s l
s7lD
oF.Ee.( D/ilf
. (nSsw)r('' PLl,vE oF M
F.
t7 00
/70p
a/-
x,53/furoD
,701
,ql3
/,0/7
6,/ :,
,E 7 L, /'
> L,/(
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, lNC, Consulting Engineers PHONE {3031 444-1951 , F FT,l /A/ ',t ,ttfi//Yr),i ,, )'JoBa /bdi-t O sHEErNo / oF.al!J-Lt:-
. CHKD. EY--'DATE pRoJEcrt/0A,.9/,i:,1^ C0,V/.-/1,:,n,\){t:/,:.ry pRELtM.
J:z ',,FINAL l/''n
?v\tru/:ltil/ r
lr/0'2,ttLtbF 8,35/
./
9 a,l
70
/i/ Q r' CilWtauEeEt.t 4r:1(,)'r r)if u/ / I ',
4 E1::?'l /l
b:i
r
Pt /,67
f,, ,B
P -74
3.'/Z
/tpL 3'0
P 4Ll
DA
n ,8!;
'l'05
x
3,8I
L.'r)
/
hil.r .
u t"7
1,j2,
2,gq
.r\i
*t
t /R
-O /, z- T'' '
./q
/. 'l
Tt
r0,//= /8,i1 ' /,3 lvc .
'U ^,//0,0 f.t,= "'-/8,r= /,7/ 0e.
/,'rb Xc(iv,3-t,$.,t' /,?7'
1..4 / n'4)/ 7".1': 1''^- ,7fi'.a //y,3 , ?-L =,rr(fuj^\. /,65Kst,
3 .',( /./: t'\
't
,Ll/5
T,F DESq4/ i
d'8,5"
//FEI pEs/F,t/:
^/
14,= tt.S ::'(r) /z (t,2,) = 6,?, r-n r
As= ,23 /.14
- -. -t/ / \/4a, [9.](il/, (/,//- 6,/z r-rr
/. ,00// P/)= ,00/ C- /s=,/8
',t/'
t=,0t/7 rrL t,(itzZ /'t"'ci4 ,:i /0//
J= n t.1" r- Eg LL tVt^-
- -* .. /1 // -1-
_'1/4,I_t_g_/_q_4__
K.67 n
n
J O H N S O N -VOIL AN D -ARCHU LETA,tNc,Consulting Engineers PHON E (303) 444-1951 , cot u/v// .
SHEET I{O / OFFISA\ A 156('
PRELIM.
--
CHKD. BY- DATE
ev JX4 orre
t"" 6trsE A
JoB r
PROJECT
CLIEIIT
5/,7 E *a/
FIIIAL
CgFCK EN
c0.,uH/f:
sr,,)'y= ztllz =:,4''e il
forf )y€E BUCEUN?sE/|)EATI
&* ,r/.74 , t',,73 , N=/2" )K =Jf'/
9/,7 = = /vfi,<s[ L7, fy' 27,rst
,zt(z*,zi)
^ja J,uu^n "4ttut ao ,nh ary4?y.
,^tl *'11/t JM. - $shu) ) s'zr
./r= ,zt(y.s.)= z,ztt tt/r_' ,,2h//7' //,L
ro o/lp, ^ /t,B fo /b,, - n,t[(+)(d]*["zfu,rL,tX
- q/ /< N,Q, ,1 j3.7
hy L' ,f srr*ayrps' *n-"i;{,![(sal,)
/z/'E snrral)Fns 0K ts stttttt'lr
ti
''l
i
fr tz'x 6ktL!
,4 - /r,, X4t H,lS x 8 "x /'O v,,
t6B5
Inte'national Conference of Building officia
RESEEtf,(tf rommtrrEE EEr0[nmEn0[il0n Report No.
Jnnuory.
, , !::1, j; ;;;i'1;.1;l'i],,1';;llli:,,,,11,:r,,, r.t,.. | !_ i:,,,,,. ,r,, , , ,,
horrr li, r, *i,t,,,,.,1,,,,t,i, 'i.,1,,"'r'r Ir('r'v .lirri(lr I|,.'rr''r,|,,r tlrr, ,,r,,..
li"',..',i'tl,'ll;;,;:lllllt;,;:;illiiijil;ilTlilililli'i"i;:,{':J',Ii,l;li:Ii;
il:ijjji:;1,.lli:ili.jt,,ii;, \i;;,1t,;,l:,,i.1:lt,l,tl;:t,iii,llillllt;,1,;l:
ili:Iiln rjriil'riih,iill i,,]{liiJ'ilii{ *iirij:,,ri^ff
," 11J..,,' li,,:;i;,ll* ,,'iiir i'''.i,,,,,i,1,,1;,..:':,i:Jl,'l;::,;i,'];,;, il::"i....,,,
i ilfff # i;l.llii'll ''rrr.,r|r)r, IIr hiqh r,,rrty srre'rrtr
ILt,,r,r. t0.5 r.,ll,,iis,,{ rirrr r
_. )rl'cr.nl l(l:trr (o ir,..lrr. rL.rrsilr ol i0 l,,rrrrxls pr.r r rrlrit:Ioot
.r,1,", l..'ilii*111",.,,f..,,1,,';;i,,"n t.rrs,rr. ;,,,t .,,,,"" ,f,,i,r,"*., ,i,l
,ni11,,,,.
i,i;ili"'',*.,,r,.....-.... - . ..'. ,,!ltiiliiillll
I o;rrr1. ... . . . .. , ........ ... ...- 31t.3.1,,llorr*
l t t.-.A R t.,cfi F: n.; coN.lit it.t.r j_r t_.^r.r. A l([, rrr,,,,,,,,orr,riJool"')ltcli.s ANt) I"t,(x)fi s zz[ \1 t..s t. \v1..51.1,.I I. Ll) A\ nl1r1.H(rsLLl,E pA lt K, NI..\r, JI.jttsIi). o7:(,{
,,"1;,,I1::;;l':'ii'':l;,11j..,,11"',,;:'l:',", .r'rrrr.\r,.,rrr (i,ri,r,r,r,,u,
1i'ln"il;i;l;iili,il,;i:j :fi;,ili:iliJi':i'lilllill':';,:l':ll;,1li:i,;
f:;i":li;,,ill;;;l;,ii',1;,iiiiil:lll,ll,riillil.lii;,,illi,,'1,1,11;;i'll,l:;li,
.l'irrrlr *i<lc hr 2l irrclr lrrrr,, .r x,,, r.n,- i.,,, ir-,,, i,l"lr'il'il. lJ,l:li,l1,:;liil,l'_ r;},
:;:i:;;,,):li::.::1, ilrr 'rDr111 .rrl rii <h rrc,r. rrr rir.rr or
l;:illlli' l::i::;ll;,,:;il",,illl:,1,,i;;';' f,:' ;;,'ii,,i,'"'irl"
''' ,1,1';,.,'';ilil,,'l;ll l;,;,,,-;:'?::1, ", rroorrr^s sc^i'g ,
*l$t**' i;uilll- ili*i::ffi :
Ii ill;l iii;i;i;:,i[r'*, *:,,,*l
",i*j,,;jiil 1ii*i,,,,,'ji, rflr jr, *il"*,,r I r;i,.,'
+:;'ilii"'Nll:.,Ji.], l i.r l.r' r.rri'l lorrts 'rr. nr srr f'rttr
t'
ltl,1I'l'l:)i;'1,;;,tlirrrhritA,rr ('i,'\r,,rcri('., rtrc fo dr'irrg I,t"' ;]i;l';li',,[:'rl itrtlrlir atiotr rh,rll <orrrptl *irh rarr
(h) A,..rr,rrri,rrurrr ,,.1 2 i,,.1,.r .l ,|xlrtrr.eiglrt <rrrrcrctc I
iii;ii,'iJ,,";;;,.,;"' ,1:lll ""'" "r trrc conrrgerionr ror '
tt-:ui'.i',i'iilll,i'li i*i,w'i*i,-
j
TIir r<,<rrrrr rrrerrrl.rt irrrr i.
IAE| t n0
\"1,t,,t tr, .,,,.,,r.r1 rc.r.t;rrrrirralior,.
| . rrt l.x I I tr..ltrt {1,
Dcrrsig' ....... .. .. . ' 'lr"i _- . .,...7.j r.rrlri<,[r.r,t
r,.l' I ;,.1;: i ll';i"i;,1'.iil:: "1;il :. l"l,::,, ; :;;,il., il il :;* l'" "t'''' rt'. ijinn-'t,""t't,,1;;:',:il. li:il"",,ri",r i.,x,.il,;i''".,it':i'i:i..i::;;iil'h;i';,:;'l.lil iili:l,1;i:ll'Tl;,f :l';'r,,i'v ;;'r'r,,i;;;i;l ;1xl,J: .'ilil
i'"'"i #?,,ilf :u"i'i. .ii,',1'i"Ji.L':iill'1111,il'i;"1*."ii:l;l [ll:
Rccommenclation
, IV. Rlconrnrcrrrlntiorr: Thrrt ,f,.. ir,,",,1_ ,
l;;1ru;,',',;,.;i*',,,,,';",ili'.lliil',,if.i,,lJll'li,lil:.,J;?iii;;'1"'i,l..tf;i:
L ll'horc. urcrl irr .lrc,, o[ lil
lrL'ili:ini',1'T tl'ir.'' t':'ll' tiil['*,,i;",' l'"'t"'r't'' -''"''
t" ) J.l";":'i;;t ;'?l'.:,'i;;:li,;1i1,,;: rccrrs rhart bc ri*rirr.<r rrr
'
o,
Lu*f, :: ll:".11 ilx',li;r:';ul; ;l il::i;)";:i,f iiil,.:l
.lurull'l it;ii'*;*iii:i;]itffi;,','"'iffi
;iffi 1,,, i, * Il | ili,h r*r*r**[il:
C
coHXtC 0|l 0t5t6tt 0fi 0r scn rpr Inrr,!r -Drr., ,0""*.-liii-ll--
s UPP0R I ttC trt M8tR5
lirrrr 1.rslrr,1,,! pr.r..lrr.r.l ";,,,, ;[]'-.,..l-
\rrrrr,,rl-u.Llir'l;tliruti,tr.,;;;;,liij'c"*-__-,
\r'llllllr.l .rl <.rl,.rir,r .,,^-,....
Norrrrirl
\\i.l,ling
I t tllr11111111111,
\lt.hlirrg
I lclr'1
\\t'lrlins lL j'il r:i:illl,:i,,ll l,: i
.lr:lit;1,,, li Hf, ",,t:
ii :'l;lltJ.-,; l':l'l:;1, T:l:,,;11,,illl:,,,,, rrrpper,r rr 1'11l
t,'
I,
Page 2 ol 2
Report No. 1347
rA8 !t t, t. I I - Atr-oitAB Lt t'
^,tJli,:ll iill: "i::.51
tN PoullDs PrR !ltlE l- t00I'
llTAcHMtxl l0 3uPPonl lNs Mttillttsr ---ltormrt I Inttftnrdrttr I ll'rY, l
Formut.a lo CDmpllt lllortbl' 0rrphrrtm Shlrrr I
cauGt lx0 slst Mt rll,
IHtcrxtss
(ln I nchttl
c0vtR nr0IH
(ln lnth.r)
l NluuM SfAX .1.' r0 c0MPUlt
OIA9INAGM
!lrAR9
(ln t..t)
465 | 8l0
{ 97;} | ---- 1396
r- | l.
I.t2 t )u/
9l:ll + 532
:j670 + il'
.t9.15
+ 553
t.
t :- ,01 79
24
r : .02jll)
4
)
!)7(i
+ 2(; I
l,
I (i9{l
1 3(I)
t,
(i
| 690
+ 273
t.
2u0()+ 3ltt
t.
3940 + 315
22 t, .o:l)9 32
l{)
r - .(1359
32
!.12(|+ 27i
l.
,The:rll'qablc.lrcrr r:rLrer llr"rl lre f r Nrl(L\l trtlirLlrrrtt\ rr rlrttr;berl in'l 'l'lr \'! l'
'Sr" Tnltl. No. I lnr ltr. llt'. trrvl rrrrhr 'r rrl 'nrt
(lrrir't't'n\ l"r t'rth rL'rl !rtit tr' \rtt|lxrrtinr In'nrlnt\'
,r, - .n.'n in fcet. bttstcn rrrtrnherr rr'l'trrrtioc tlrlir il l0ii(l\'
IAB[T NO. III-N[IOWAI}LT SHTAR PER fO(T AI MARGINAL
fAsltttlf{Gs PAnltt-t1 10 otcx sPA
rABu N0. lv-stcrloN PRoPtRrlts PfR f00r 0f vllDrH
sPAC|l1G Ot ll/ASH[t wtL03
(ln Inchl!|
sASt MtT.lL
rxlcxritss
lln Inch!i)lllorrbt? Sharr
.r)lr]1)
cruct
stcll0l{
H00uru5
lln I nc hlrl
H0i{xr 0t lttnTll
lln Inch.r)
2tl
t!
2l)
.{t9.I
.l:ll
.l(;ri
.g{r,l
.0(t(i
.t)!tl
. .l
Consttlting Ensinel
sxeer ro /
PHONE (303) 444-1951
F00r//,'tr,':
604D05
sxeet ro / oF ./
PRELf ir. t/
-
S'N7 FINAL
RAF. F00f///C sa4fyefA/,ELEVIF,TT? s,!,{F.
r-
I $l
"l !
RE.t,ttF - 5,4"'r/' ,' !-: ''tU. !
n RF/ilf - Lo/iq D,tP. i
/4/X L?lfl C?///j/4,fD= 1{,/
tln6
t 25',/
+ 1i,i
ul/ =l/
*o C nntu-, ?/7'3') = v.zs
,iy'.'.0'az /l/,= .oot0.ss)G,t(),1d" = z,L kr' /= /,':r
' K) /qV f=.0039 ,4r.,255n-/ft
^ah#s_gj!!)_
.PYl Mr,* ,e'n 0,og2.tit('5i =
/1- /b0 /=,Olst A, j,j!
WUIfC
5,i,i R'FT
,r/=57!,
. . ./^ ,*.,,/i t
@ /:*
/^
J O HN SON.VOILAND-ANH
BY JYq o^rE^)2/ g /(f7Z
CHKD. BY- DATE
-
ULETA, lNC. Consulting nnsineS
rca* /hB 6
pRoJEcr unhg/lf,lo Io/il.:tzs /"//4#Z
PHONE t30 3) 444-t95r ^^ Fqla///r'
SHEET NO , OF W4 / /
PRELIM.
-
CLIENT U FINA L n
PRESSUEF 0// soJ'L CUF fO 0/f;erUEt////f :
X= (ll,/ -tt,D/yp,yg = 2' ' , zxr: b) x 8' 'oo. '
Mrw /4Hrt{L(- wt*.aL/ . ?+ -- 7-te@ = 3,4? tcs,c /V,f ,I x {-^ '
fdo|" r;./,a- : (/ rt-
{z t,n t/6,q ,.//,0
n
#5 a3"
c/rEH r7E{\ )i ))'2' tF/, tzl-J/f tf )
' K"= f4-." /-,d/)/q[%.)s ,002f ,4s=,///i/ #4 Op'/
-tt -2 J,, ,.i r,,7' : i.L
x--(lt,l-n,ly'l,tz= 2 ^. a,,/3 n;'n/f
m"/t/ r,iut^Ai ? (]$o'' ;,lV EsF i74.' ,i, -)r.r/+ \/, _\ la. t- x-nr , tr:l1t
en asgtqNt fnn' (49,U1:Xrt,t7X.'t*/,7i = 37,2"' .. ,^/ d=/0'25
lcw€r ,rrtrir, L L ,ql '' /=:0#? ls = ,8^Q'6 ;y't rct-# a yXpgqn
. f - : / \z/ rz' \ , ))
7By uvtrf 8!0 ) /,ln= cpfugtJ ( t)-,tqzlu) '= f' / / x-r7 il' (,2 d "
f= ,rT-1)- ,00/y' isa,!(5 usl#5 yFnE e/0/_
L
r::'l'I
i'l ']
p#/0//; pr.1aXs)?/. 0) = 23 F'Fr t //,gt
I )L-'!t rt | ,,,= t/
Kx trl p'.0/3.*' , ,4s? ,47;^ 'fg fnrugP:0-.,
il t,
i t,'l l. . r l.
flFFL Dts/r,y; rv, =|s.oz)(.D(ofl.kd = 19'6f'F/ o/= /f
^" ..
i ' I , .r , i.l,'. : : .,i r, ',r' ', ,t , ;
o^t/dp*tt,/ /,rtr/fr / /we a/-/v"e 4 l'l*fufi,t'un /,"#t
,,',e(*)' fu= / 0 I (,') ftA/,,r'm, =ry, b 4 ? ingr(.r'te) o/,M = /s " h I /s'/n
o o
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers
, Br Jyq D^rENoV 8, /) lceo /63b' -, , = ?==:
cHKD. By- DArE
-
eaotecr t/hilsl,Lt4D r 0/Io9 PHl9Ffi
CLIENT
wl LL* s uPlNrEp rhP d p7Tr :
//--
?g'/''
PHON E (303) 444-1951
R.FTA)xINO
SHEET NO / OF WTLLS,
PRELI}I,
rnat !
1,
\",
$l
r\{E)3
st tf,l
I
-(ACr/il(
r0EcF9
I-w"caz+
__u//2L!_E*
.A +5!\l sl tfr l
r 'a;l rrl GI o{l
sl il :L
A/U/lO7'f' 4o,A lclptg /Q,,-V/F aC1/// co/yq/rn// r/ttl'! artt//??/ 'bo
VSE
'7ol
totPS stEl&
o o
JOHNSON-VOILANo-AReHULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers
, av J^g ,orrrur,n, r) Joa* rh6,t J
cHKD. By- DArE
-
,^otr", ttql's//tlo C2ilt'r9 P/'/ASF tr
cr-teHr 4
6.EPES/qr1/ ct/Y c' W4l)/ ///YfE ?ccUES /4f
i
PHONE 1t03) 444-1951
^ EV4tu/'t/q
sxeer o z oF ttlLls
PRELIY.
FINAL I/
E/.€t1 7?!z
,i
47 fis/DF FACE
#4 @ r/0 tontz.
n
tQ , ,'lL t,o!),
AssU/f//,
,
/'1"*{ = 'l!
hy 8't wo//
/t'0037
(,,D(v,sf= 4,o//""
o/= 6,r.r" K. |fi/ 6l-MmD,/ U,r.r Lt
A a
As=.278,;"=/ftW
,N5FCT
-tK
;.r
l"r'l
t$Rl
ld1\I -1 \t^
I lll
7,01i
n
JA
^)
rrcr/Eggp RFTA/,VA g_ w h ' cytL = t2l ncr
,o Ts
ts.'
lP,
,L
-t'u
-,1
t7r4 o
V
I f
]
!'ql ,!':!,t -7?'7*-0,Hp= s,gb (5.55) = 18,1',-',
Mai f / _ t%,
:)i ,K n 6?7-
D 4 IJ.'1 t.2 1'v v
' -K-Fr tt 4 | 2'"
^ ^ K'rT'*' 3'45
- ,nkrT C. AV - rA* ,vq
/,5 )
b/
'o'
l a,5
fr lot
| ,t | ill /!o rt tup/t
I
'f .n 6,63 6.5
f, z.0d 2 '5'r, /,[0-. 4'
iN,', i:;t!,(:
vi d'-';:"i:]";';'
L-I sF:/,v F
lTil s'F' ='/fi34;
' F-FT 370
l',': r,e'=/'7 p,,:,, ,. , ha/
n
tb
o o
,:,"#;"*":::ffi;H Consulting nnsineeS ULETA, INC.
neo /b85
PHONE 13031 444-1951
c0l/ C,
sHEET Nol' -- oF ct1|//M,i,!,
CH KD. BY- DATE enorerl Lt7lJSilEAD l1A/D7i ea*w.
ctrcw P/ffff 6e//Ep, F[r'/|u1,4 sC07T nnat n
P,tax = /?iK x /,55 ' .1??! utn lr, tolo n glfn tbl - 8t/ = ?t-7t
/<.t,g 7 t= ,2i (ft)= q'- /t,/rt, ' - /
hly'= rhr/s= zz E' 34 - GD = Yb
s/ilcE A7 c /8 , s/e,ukt//4ss e#errt myvle ?orly',
ly rot/ cah':
c7ttrCK
*/"
b'-
rty /t'y'/' ,zl(tz)' sr
k//r=3b <lb'
/2'/ c/ *,4 .-ln
J,iA ruuil J rtP
(/f
n(o i,
'.tt
,/ ,ly?/"'1.
,z%;'= aft?' (.0 .
PU/vC/y/,4/t s/tF,f /tT T}P
-7
2/xt7' 75. f t/
, n/r12r!ap-, -,//rfr ,,ttl
,ab,/,u/14 fu rk*r/U r i' ' ,Ytk / o't ; 4//0117//" t/=
Or rcrf coa: /
1,,r. = ht6+ fl)/2. /B5vsi
fr, = (trdp 1v/)(r,.rt - z) = s.r E
ipr.sO ' =/0,0[il = 0,76'/ n,aft)'l'l'*26,/5'
4.5*' zol * o,zg G,g+TpT+
r 000
- /5?,0 f Mq,
,3 ,< t85) +ta,t n
J/t3ox,r'?/,2"
d= ,r.7J" *.g6!)'l',
tr"t,r= /4,2 x tz,7( (t,5
/0 00
s/eF oF c7/.t)//// cAP/Tol * 2 gftu|b -/8, / = 28/( '' ',;i;';;: ite* ---', = e7,b" ,sp4iof ' hrs1'@ +,s7es)) 4
usr + !0 fr x / aenrlp.> pt,y?t p, ? col.
r t t t\ t\ 'rltuarv, s/vtd/p rnsss e l'/ecfs
/ ) ,- t /
,,ie o1'- rp 14 cr/r, / s/g or o
i/:ir'rl1'y;l'
: le oR._, q/u4 eailJt/ s, g,ar t,,
Guy's' /"t/ /ngyt / 70,,il /, tt.rgt' 41 ;.?1 '
ryttfu.X' (ut {ven +'s ( p s)) + ft 4lt I t1.'t".
7/,2 r/q.ff I ))+let . i)o't wr >z V(.,ry'/
'yri::g,,/rev7ty'
vad t
ftoE;:
/ry lo /up r/ ,
'lrr=tiuvst
t*( /2.714 ,-211t2x
natlE
/g6[p rfi 6oP) +8, t = 3228 ytr.
f7c=/0b7si r\U ,v/ cdL t
{r,w''.#Jt (l,t ,{va-T +,aQgb)) * /6,/ . 37u-- ulr. > 2 f 4/ 4i/
'!/;!'l:l&i',;t !i; rilf .t",t
oE.
N
> r,r I <F4d rr.5r]-k9,
i*: ?
odaQ .,1 U)tH ao9Z |'iz - <z:2 7 :9<;YF,!.o a<a <Ol'lZ >l:l E*;9
=<L)fi9o-i
-Fe<o>*<of
r(<B
:
ul
ul
z l
llJ
z
s
F
ct
u,l
G
o o
l!
ui
J
a
u.l
J
J
F
F
v,F z t/l
E
UJ
t
tr
lrl
0.
o
z
-o J
-f
o
LL o
=
=e F
-l
a I
t
NOrrvnlvA
z o9
t-\ < o
I
cco
9o ;>
.2 *<
dc):q
;.i
I9 >(,(t
: OA
v
B
u.
z
tr
E (J
u,l
u,l 2
uJ
^
d
o
N
N t
R
\
rd
a
DESICN NNVIT,$I ROAND
DATE OI.' M]I]]TING:
MEIIIBERS PRESENT:
SUI]JECT:
ACTION TAKEN BY BO
MOTION:
VOTE: FOR:
APPROVIiD:
DISAPI'ROVIiD:
SUIIIilIARY:
SECONDND BY:
AGAINST:
14"
ABSTBNTION.:
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC' Consulting Engineers
at J'lti o^rE /0 -27Q llar /b8 .
CHKD. BY- DATE
PHONE (3031 444-1951
P0 9r'
SHEET NO / OrfErtC/,)tyE/;
eaetw. 1 stla
curetn PEr-C€, 1t.t,l'f,F, f,:fil\..D', Sl4TTruat
sLtE rfliCL7/t!;i B,y s pAN -Fr;r'rh RAT/09: ( vO -UE)
/,/Ax s,p/1/V 6,t-s ) " l-t /- / r0 c,L d : (,q'/ r,j 5,7//
LOAi )
Ll. ' 75 tT_;r 3,t.tl)'17 ls LL = q) Fs F + /,6 kLF /4/,4t\. L//,ttrMALi'
s pL' /00 pSF SJ/L S DLE 25 PSF + ,t/Ft<u. t/.^).,.'.': t,1,,
stAB DL- 7,5,'',!',F -)-
B " t; Lit'
gtvCE r7V,L,,'..':,F i L rtlE r0 Ltv/NC u///rr=[),t,7f1t'16.s1 rqL "r0-]' lgr
WL:MJC-eqruE - _!)jJ4QG - Ar E//D EP Q tYlLL
l/l
LL e
DL
Y/ff 44Pi l.|trtf ,+,ul)r,r+ 4Qltr
'o fi rsr * lb^!' '
/,() >> ,7{/rt/.)' rt'nlLln/ st,/' ,':,,,.'i,,/ ," AC? 315.77
sECT /3,1,/,8
l,it Y
ttl)F L't.E SPL ,qtt LL sil\l/ solL
75 t /90
q{
\ii
f /00
/,vg,hol
to/q/ area t
lat/ t
4 zzt[rf):
R5rrucgt> ftcl,
tL=
'ED 4//.9:
30'l ,,/i/ vsr tLo/,t
tttf l frP' LL
.atruu +)ib rtF eigs DL 9 Ult
/2 / x3 . 3b..,{f '
2.9 P,F t p;tt3p
?,rs/ttr,tr,/t *tts
' 2?q PsF
f,,5 "
a6,538
za6
,275 fSF r(tr/L
/75 PS,c
o (/'-
k 2b,53'
t76 psi
{
1
l4/4t
q. Mry
F (,r)
r/A rst
I
I
oK4
rrotecr-t/?il!. //.1,/', C0//il 4S
t'y it/,t,tcri,tr 1t5 rtf i
'1,v5 ' j
I
j
I
I
vt,'t0
6n
-or
-2fl
-t q
V
'6,2'li
-:08i
I
I Q/^/1 \vvt
i
I
I
I
l
I
i
I
s (i'",h1' n' ,,.,r(!,.) = uBin3
I STFF::jE; I O
-----;--|-'u/1yt' r rr/ t I z1'/t-/5'= 1/77 s{
tt',,tt D,L.l Xipsf,
K i8 I I
D,t-, (us1 rn) lt,tt I I ,s o
f,Ett, p,L',"!. q'; ', . I,fg 't -'tf ' sllrPl; I
t',Elt, T,L:' i4,r-/ +6./7 V,5/
l,-,.r,1 1,.,1. . _i1,2(
'-3.h2 (,6i) y6,77
t+q.& t +,5q
x.75-/75 - nail,,l{
z57tf
I
/,0
-qrr
-?. Q
1r/l
-u Et
*l/,'5
0
f ft'st,lt ypltyltt:f,) = 5/2i,,t
at atwficfr,m ,/wfrugtt -r1,ck
I I,!;#"9 vry :;i;t['it a*
/''AX, No il,
f ,p,"
I b,i7r,,t,
6,t3
-so8
8b0
(- nilY
'n(*o
tenim nft.l,,,. 1"4'' s a oy,si
uuF nilrn =,) t'- =+rzu\f'si
'> z,{i'--1rnru, i, ls=,optc ('t(';,1)= ,1t1y,ii/€t
o't. r. t{rt . gJ)!}) ",v214'xp 4ir> 4 (s sil
- 3, ? ,/rr ^,,;/r/:-A, ' z,//.r(t t=,/z;,y't'
,,"i ,t"- .riYq,;y' {. u,t'c f?@/& /
v
'L)( 1,77
v
CHKD. BY- DATE
?ra/F/tolat
tt rb/q/ilwt
/o "a(:' r e\m2),( /tTJ
a/ttul^/nu
ey J Xfr. oere
p,tt^ril'no&:
,/F
70/. /J-''
e ab/,o ^,t ql% *a,/
*?Ar5[*,r,
'flftt'fio,fl,n*o,
'o;'tu +'o/
fyh/rttci,y
*36/rSF
2A0 PsF
6nrau/lI t0/09 t',
RY aAtA,yc/ilr I ',
fru, t
OK,
FR7F4E Ar cotqfl/w suFPoET/NQ reW
filD sL,lPA,c tsf rfP/}1L cr,e,'l/YD PilrE/gN
p/u,,|/ce L
Lma=
t, ?b
rN,f
f,6
1,7
.,.ft'
tnTE
t/,olr
JOHN SON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.Consulting Engineers
JOE #
enoteq lt1l9//tlJ) C0rlo05 enettu. l,/
FII{AL
IQ
,,k
/ 70' f7F o/<.
pHoNE t3o3t ffiJssl
sxeer no I s7-rE'q.l,o/Yft
, ,,/ S L/yU
(JR,FILF AT E/97 srA/P Tntlp.
279- FSF
/758r
n
a,"r'"/
!y
JOHN SON-VOILAND-ARe HULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers
ey r)A+-oo-rr,,-.--r D ro'* /vt).t . . O
.HKD.By-DArE- pRotEcr LlLlgiE4D coyDc?- /'/kx fr
PnoNE (3031 444-1951
SHEET l{0 / oF fi / '
PRE LIM.
-
Ff NAL t'-
ttsE-l r!.!i:'- TY:2!L:-72!S F
' ?ti r r^rrcaE-cot''ttErfl'v oF s wf'q ;'
CLIENT
- rR 0 t/ rEE L/H, s//t'Er /)
f1 -ls tl?UR f/FE ErtutllC ntQ'DJ
"v_04f.H_:_
s Qo/_ _ ft!z!. E s_
&aax
R EDt)CFt>y'. Log,
dq/ Uw
r.)/ 'fR E rF..ry'S ,
SndX
F/A
4 rtpq/t;
STE
nvl TTTA I
/7, F.
F,E,l'/7t
,/ (4)
i,y/e
H ,tf
zlJ--- A
€a,;>
5K/P
3,s/f " " "
)florn //e//n ^ t ^ j-, I
-:-; /l Ytl / /
A= 16k' , tr' 180;i.1a
f= 5/zirt/ft 7-t375au
s=/28^t/tt s=tt7?;n\
(.- = f{rs)a,1 ,hrrrl 7.,-((* = 60tr p , :;h'! ?-e )
/n z0l PsF xrr!
/7, PSF
/0,3 K'rr 7,'/'''17@fsr
to,'€',<-rI 'w, jt;,/
' ?t.29, 1t zt ^/, + (. /l
{qK/Fr 3/,1 -,..
5Qzpsi)\'L
+__ /ssUNF
$ w'ttts
sLAt3 /c///fE)> T0 C?Ls.
f pTQ:;)
laok,r*si)
nw trtprn o/h"r,i'/rn'f hr:/,'/rci,,l ;
2 fi" tz6psi
ar hsr,n 0.1/* ,/ tpn/tt'r:t;f't
rr4T' = 3nE07s!
o*/ */.o//*r'' a, lf Tuwotrrrolu/:,3 fc' = ,tz0frsi,
mlw qvt7 nfu*r; oy'111 s'iri. ;
,,/n r t- aA
( Ft ttz
m)n As
rTP/CA L
i2",lcgusr,ti cE/ttv' l'arEFK.
ztt-_g ttlrl
-d
q )
\\J
tolD/ilf A/gf /yEc,eS-S,4d f ' bv lCf 3/g-7/ stcTt3,y./.S
!'Nlcr r rt' o:i./it !ul7t5f7;E ,;.,69g ,t'Ol,:: S I
fues t;gg1-:;7 t/rA!, t r.. F:.tiE 'oF H/d. J _j
l-r, n.-t- -" t + : r =-n rt .r tt{i, ;
; r,, i ;,ir.6 F r r.
I I N'TTE: ot'c T
LoEc. t,/ tlrh r
,/|'le' = t6007sl
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCHULETA, lNC. Consulting Lngineers
CHKD. BY- DATE
cuzw 7. Et- , F ,5 rntau n
'P/Z.EDD
Fa)nA/G9 rc,'; coi/Ge7€ Gatz a u/5
Pl{ oN E (303) 444-1961
< a\ F(j) ool lo/tltO ,orr /Lt+rrrrr*o 4 or -f
pxsls61 L/a,tl, ,J/AD ,:e,</rsos Vt+t'i * ,^.ttt.
6!/, q.1a,pp = /?3 t
nzy' 4c atles
4,*r @.s\as1,)t
_z_7rr!_. (rcco)= /3o,1
//L///qtrE - /.55x 173 = Lqq,zL /,/L7'/lltrE - /.55x ,/tt',3 = Z"/"/,
zq?.2 /ig.s\z ' 4, /4 2/rr-,\
f 1'/8" Bna A ="
'rvarr/,n-
(.zo)(:.rr,) =. ft7,6ra/,
at A. 1t (/L)h , zo/. / 4t-
USE /t /' >rt) eoLututr./
ZZS.J p-p7
Z7/t ,l L-ra./
Mn=
k.
roz (nz)z
//s€ /Z 4C zw f /'lS" FdE
I
/13 a ,. aa 53
/2 - f./
(,8 iY-,1 a,/1 ,
d,/4,
/t/D.6 <Q
I ,ens/r4 , 4,71-
o/n*
/4,, ,ra Cq.-u *r*/
(,0.) q'mrs) ,
E,h/. /4rf,
y' AA t'tz
n Ela <,c,
6-o 34,
7la
tl* ,
I As'
(,{' s.,
/73,,? {/.ss.) = 76q< L
7Fy #/ z 7 /. lg"
/r,ss ) . zolE hr de e i/- u'
_ z24S',2 lroaa)
= //!i. z
b7
A*=4,zr (s.") ( 4/;= /87// Fr-z /
- ZZlg,3 u./-E
As=(*)(n zs\ = 4,6{//- #.4 ak/
tlQ:)-(N.
z
i *r.sy'r = 4r/
.\
, /1t9 'c (o'tz \lt/ - >---
^' 84- ( /z,z.s)'?
= /52'z
3,43 hs€ I - +l €tx/. Rai'
" ) /62/42.2( ' 4i3 z,&rr.,/
= /oo, l !, /a!:" , ( '"":)-
= /zo/,o /at-p Os) (E'qs)'
/f?,? rr-e
/?r1.o tu-L
/\\aazs(B+)(rz,zS) =
re Q,sQ -- E3
4* , t.as-(t 1\( 37)'
, ,/O4,5
(ze)(tz.zt)
(+s -r+'s)(n-)(4,e) lro = s4.J
613 / /+,25 /a z)(,ar) = .4/ 6k5/ r
{Gd= -'/(,a* az})-f++I[C+,+1 = zTzB z-
'' )7r,' B / a sllso,r4(nls) + . . E-Tsr
o
/X5 :. .ooz t .= z,gl usE f !{ 6 n/, pr
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ARCI-IULETA, lNC. Consulting Engineers
, e't 4cH oor, "'rt,D
Sn)//-,hD Fo/.)f,
.1 ,b .562
((o'1/7. )
/{,sx /.ss = ,!."+''a/a.zs ' 4 17
e-G?'rc&@
z,-, ( A5"9"
FHONE (303) 444-1981
" /3,2
Z7.73at-tt- ,'
,D68 *s,r a.L.
CHKD. BY- DATE
crrenr P, B,Ll , F. -6 rtnal
A3 = ,ooo4- (s.\(e,zt s) = ,,/aa /^/a'
Wl ttA./,tr€/L/ /r'oPct:/) sEcrto'+f
(zz,zs)( l)
I
.- Z,3l ,pr-k
= 27,73 nrt-P-
: ,a3q ESl
l.t/azs1 = Z/,42 @ CoelcP s.E,f Z/,4.x /'f5' 37..17
t '1 " I J'al
L,T 6)I S
,l
T
OA LL
, /E7- A=
il
l
, /.(lzaaa ,.
(a/utttil
/('")(,=f
Hntts :
3sro:7/PE
/-
I -:- f-l/ 3 )P ttL
v ..-e ;TZL
{"' ' 3@>o lry|3,t: - z:z:l/
//6
4 - //,!il-
u"( ''t:
v(toq&T 2 .A./1 -
,4o ta/. s4{
zz t l'
4-z,tc/,
.Saot.t/,
=--
ltt\
V /.ss (zz,zS=
= /4,o5 tt/L
Qr' '
r1<
,l,l t
42,/6
3't
5u .i
1.. l
I rl,
,
[= ('t"+f,)
L -Z Z.
JOHNSON-VOILAND-AR&HULETA, lNC. Consulring Engineers pHoNE(303)444-resl
sy t-cl'l oor, '' / -'D )oBt /.i..t '- = O ,, -,,rslEgtlo oF :
cltKD. BY-DATE pRoJEcr / /"),t / !'! y''li '?""" "' ' t'/" t" t ''t P;ELiM._-_-
F" t :,i,. t,..
v l/l L L|r
FINAL
\a/AI-.1-
Sttrr-,
l, ' :..r-l'. " ,// 4 r
' 't,
,-'
t
'l
fr:r'!S1t
- -J/,CqsE'* |
d4,-.--
-/'n'/ 4. " t,r/rh!
YE
.4-/5,5
JJ,,tt . :iift 1
lc4l.>3 i
l: ri -.;-
(;:':t'. V/4L15 ?
,fttrtltrt16' :
/i! /r 7
lan'ri"i
t 33#/rr
8,5
11 1l, \, .',--
.,.!.:|Jr/r r
tl (/)-'-.9 az
//4,3F
,: l,l k
,(f.i,t"l"r
-,, 't/a6-1.:-,irttj
-E/,, 1:r, il
Ill :1
l"tl ', 1,4(,.1. y.-.f-
.,,-".-.-:..".
.rk.- 7 Z/ ,!, r.-n t''
l.L}f_'|'r
_:-,-:.Ai_-
!l ,trtflE i"'l-4 ,
/t.,. ., .'\ :'','( t,:,' . l
i --^,I-t, ,'Ai I.',1-'
':-:-::-:- '
"l ' :: /.) 1l ; t-.-,. s/'f F ,t
Z : C v// lrE ,r' ?.i
rl z"
(ttrr: )i':'t.f L
I
i
. " I nL l -14 "_ /,\1,,- ti,'f
t c a. l'l-
'-? t 1 8-0
"_r, _--_- "_.-i t 8t u'/, r
7'/t ..:f-." li
i i;;.";::a'\dv
_{rt *a-r7..(7'*--'-*:,)
Sf,it ,"'
/ F,v r)
\z-
JWS
z.zsLu'€ 4.o7oF'F
I
,i,qm "u ./.a?2 ,"LF t**Jut**Y'M
I a-l5,oF,'u E 4C,zno n=t 4n./
k/u=t,B
Y-l L,| '\ \ ,--
€,r:;i:X1,".,i:i. ) : /Lb,r
l, - z.ofi t,,-.r
fi. S.7oE f-,7
. r> t,t./ t DE f'Ttf
--) rv
-r'!- 4:',7%
' t,'l' -"3
n
JOHNSON-VOILAND-ABqliULETA, lNC. Consulting Lngtneers
av . .r-,"r ,^r. ,.1/i'0"-"rr ' ti,qt
-? -.,o.;!.+BErr{o -r- ... , f'Lf:I::''
cHKo. By_ DATE
-
pRolEcr L//t^/'-/lL /)D (b/;r" ')(avA/L PnELlM.
PHON E (303) 444-1951
OF
..-.- 1k'<:'-', I l"t-
5 lo sd,
ari.'. t'i ;.: '.
| ,,,,*
6,rf,
I
I
. 4'34.@.'
54(..q.4v5)"?
.,.-. : y'-'-41,i,4'3 41s 4:a .gG/4:t' tol:?,
t <otL ;'.r:I=s.. ' -g'@o t:$F j c-
t.+ (zs.t) + 1.7 (aa.7) = /aa.1t
/3+.3/n.a= /.sg r /
/r:c 4 411as;s'y'1'tt'-r tl F '/t€':r'
56,./'r.4''
sc,lF' 29.3v 2-L t 2a,gLt>t-
r,a( 2".8) t t7(tt,z)= B'r,t'-v 4!:,s'i 1= tz"
't:.-t&A - fr?,rs/,ar(zo)(z.o) "
,\,u- 'LlLNl?I*r, ,
567,aF-
y= ,i!:;l- - ...t""-,'-)
' '/,4c, u/t
'
-ru-y' 8 "* 6" 1t-
; s,7, t3/ esf
4,1.1 nlL
t tlLt\|.: ',
M^--
2-
4.,4o/4.s)( z3/rc)
\-j->---:- =343V k-fr
434.4p-nt
/': '
::'
214'
/+
)/t'
;)'7 'T
4)
f,'
, /-,
tr l
.Jil
4o)
/a<t'" -r
f/*,
I
fl(
g4
e
4)
/5
2-
(4
11 '
,A
_g+
,V-
,*
t t\,2-
t a7,
;.'4
<,/
l3
,ts1:
1.,:,-l
,a
htj
??-
1,,'
CV
,+,
t8,
.T
=
- t.'./(.
14.<
7,
:-- I
t5-
=
',, )0
,l:
4t
'i
'"Fr
.-.:/,
.t.
/,.
V
(
(
\1,'- [8,!8
8n,1/, ^r
= /J( 7 ))- t
'l"t/ Llctt l^/C, I
As =, coz3(sa-)(e.zzs) + /,4? nr *
I tz't 5 */F3 *.:r'\' wa Y t
/a4'3Y
sLtENT 72,7tr<\F,S FTNAL
y::,--,-;7t t.(;r ' "- ]t-4'.'i,42'4',Stom ,+.etl:y
/l'Plt <o/L ,7^r:.t=s.. ' -g'@o t:$F
4.r/F/rr-|.i.:llt- rt lli J-i,-: v ll - r:t' r'la,
(ssz.z1(rc)a
i^ |e, i;zs )'= /2q <d.
50
/a/.r/. ,--w:o A =-""/t=(.7o)7z,oe) -
-rE/ 8"YE" l;ase."lla
: /.€,8k .4a'7ft- r
= 3 .tt'.v, /z 3 /
ZSrrT Q ?--o p'F t' 7e;.o'
,sz (zs\= /tet k I tn'/:s " 44!t ,
1o4,2 /zs = . /,17 n/, , =
.7.!.! t: 4.- ,: ;71-^, . ' :, 1
-pc-,t.lr;r Ak-:r
,4.. ' t.€ittlL'
JOHNSON_VOILAND-ARCHULETA, INC.
By Tl A D^rE /pf rlfa na, /Ul:-
PHONE 1303) 444-! 951
SH_EFT No - oF -
CH KD. BY- DATE
4-o srp ,
f-6'"\l I) / /.\(1 ;
M.t'
44.oF = z4,okLL, :-70,o
enotect Lt't,':!-. '' r' 't^':: - ''-'i "
CLIENT
PRE LIM.
FINAL
G8.8/r6
=4-.3o */rr-DL
n /,+(zo)t /.7(24-) = c8.6 t''
*S'.' e: / , /z '
ta:@C1zi)-2,
!'lf,'a r,t/ i-
,t'
lls
7 -7/ a ).
A ,'-'':+ /'.0r q'.27|,-,1. :ir .-
',r r:.',/ 7 " :4 7i " 'f!;*
y : AtJ,=!'t):, 3/,{
49 q;. 37'.'i'
As ., osr-:;3 (<a)h 7'752- l'34t1!2
,lAa,E lS .tt ,5 t::,2\.t:L -*A:Ar/,
= Ze ,l e-rr
-- fo1.2-rtJ-p
EDJ|t,le 46^rD/T/aA/
/,2(n,t)'
r,a(u.a)+
/,4(,(s3)
7.-.'l'1:':.)Q ,oS =
5 . /.417 /:',E
/,'" 3.449 kltr =
G znr'-<t = -/5L+ z,c?i .,'+/.
' * llt,o (zz'r)-7rJQt,')/r.
- [,snG)/,-)(9=)
- tcl,rtf.a\(<.1
L , 57.,1r-
r! , aB.,A t'
/lu = * Z/a77-ra
. QroYr')(f1''-.70d
n
ry \rALL: /4/D t<"/o?zt
-Jl -'//zY crlsE *J
a.lqqui
F/Z2 t
Ccutetz
ti 't
- z'fr11-'/- '. tn /2
- /2,9 *1" - - |-/o 1c"f7
-244?x -,r,ot7- / 86,? -o
,zu tt 3/r-
-2// tz -t=7-
/,7(z t,L) :
tt(ze.a) =
/,4..q
7r. s
/54
?.7V7,,2.
6...76 t.<-,
r'
L=-_
I
I
7,.:
iV' =
G)v
V"=
'=
zo'?
ll, = -2,.1??x.'/, - .o" Y7
= _i/g r-rk
r B(.f(x-,=,)
Frzr?, Ftl*f : hr' 'L,atf X7- '
= .rtaiQ(8)*5 = /.4<r rti>
,: 4':.--,: /. . i), I .
Consulting Engineers
/1
(l ,= t tttY =
JOHNsoN-volLAND-ARCHULETA, lNC. consulting Engineers pHoNE(303r?4tjl:rssl
av JXQ oarc/n:Z-E--Tl- rcso /IE-I -, -, Q sHEErilo 3, or*!o'
'HKD.
By- oor,
-
,^orr", liL,ili,jE4,^ cL''t n od , -y'^e''*' '/
cuew Hff-E FIIIAL
--
ln,€09/-b % ils/,;J,,fv es/ ca/vpr/r,///&assCtna- /00
'Hprt 7 t7z'o 2P2,5
#t :8,25" i4''5"
r6L zt
,, *.t'".
lb?.t)
8,25"
202'5
//"
r8/.8
rzt{
/87'3
t,25't
P
tt/J
q{vq;l.
fr^to',
'rr bnl /008 'h ,/e * Pel +
B tr1 int'I/*li{;l 3.7i"3,76" f
f,'l'{
,A @i
J ?tpsL dF.
I
s" ilfu ,h/. ffaut frJL @* n,q,
saET) ,605* '' $:,'r I
"iilli
Tti il 1r'-o l. tt!.o l. /t ,t,'"
t.0ta9,1rl i,gr'
i:!1
7H
chen and'associates, inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
sottttouxDlilot e€ s. zuNl . DENVER, COIORADO t0223
ItOltlllllXG 19,14 EAST FIRST STREET ' CASPER' WYOXltilG t2601
Prcparcd for:
PIERCE, BRINER s FITZHUGH SCoTT ASSoCIATES
vAlL, coLoRADo 81657
303/7'![-7105
lyJ7t2g-2123
sott nxu'?ouNDATtot{ tNvEsrlcA
F0& LIoNSHEAD C0N00f{lNlul{s '\ PHASE lll
Job No. 13702 SGptcnbcr 2\, 1976
.arl .t !i
TAELE OF COMTEITS
coltctus | oltls
SCOPE
PRoPoSED C0ilSTRUCTI 0ll
slTE cor{DlTloNs
suBs0lL collDlTloNs
FOUIIDAT I ON RECOI{I{EI{OAT I ONS
INTERIOR FLOOR SLABS
RETAINING WALL
UI{DERDRAI I{
SURFACE DRAINAGE
H I SCELLAI{EOUS
FIG. I - LOCATIOII OF EXPLOMTORY HOLES
FIG. 2 - LOGS OF EXPLOMTORY HOLES
FIG. 3 . SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULT5
FIGS. q THROUGH 6 . GRADATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE I - SUI{I{ARY OF LAEORATORY TEST RESULTS
I
2
2
2
3
3
ll
5
5
5
6
coilcLus | oNs
(l) Tho rollr erc .rr.tlc bocru:r of thc pr.r.nc. of nen-nrdr flll on thc
north Gnd of thc rltc. In gcacrel, bolan thc flll end toploll r
nrdlun dcnrc grevclly rend occurs. Thc wrtcr teblc lr ebout 8 foct
brlon tho qrntcr of thc rltc.
(2) Tho bulldlng rnry bc plrcod on tprcrd footlngr dorlgncd for r mrxlmrn
roll prcrrurc of 31000 prf.
(3) Grenuler tollr cxtcnd to r dcpth of .t lcrrt 40 fcct end thould not
bc cxcosrlvcly dlfflcult to drlll for thc clcvrtor rhaft.
-2-
SCOPE
Thlr rcport prcscnt3 thc rcsults of a soll and foundetlon Invcgtl-
gatlon for the proposcd Llonshcad condomlnir.rms, phase I ll at val t, coloredo.
Thc report preronts thc most dcslrablc and safc typc foundatlon, allowablc
soll prcssurcs' water tablc condltlons, and dcslgn and congtructlon dctrlls.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Thc bulldlng wlll bc approxlmatcly 4 storlcs hlgh wlth thc lower
floor stcpplng up on to thc old roadway to thc north. Thc lorcr portlon
wlll bc concrctc wlth thc uppcr portlon wood or st..l frarnc construct lon.
Thcre wlll bc tvro hydraul lc clcvator! nelr thc cGntcr of thc bulldlng.
SITE CONDITIONS
Thc sltc llcs to the south of Llonshead clrcle In Lot 5 *'frlch ts a
subdlvlslon of Lot l, Block l, vall./Uonshcad 2nd Flllng. At thc tlrnc of
our Invcstlgatlon thc slte wa3 vacent. lrmedlately to thc wcat l! thc
cxlstlng Phasc llbulldlng Lqdgc at Llonshced. Thls bulldlng ls a 4-story
condonlnlrrn wlth a bascment. An lce rlnk ls under constructlon about
30 fcct northclrt of thc propGrty.
The north sldc of the sltG ls apparcntly the old Hlghway 6 anbcnkment.
Flll has a maxlmtrn depth of about 12 fect. Thc sltc slopcs dovrn stccply
to th€ mlddlc port lon of thc bulldlng and thcn rDr€ gcntly to the south.
Gorc creck llcs about 200 feet south of the 3lte. Thc south half of thc
rltc ls covcred wlth grass, brush and wscds.
-3-
SUBSOIL CONDITIONS
subsoll condltlons wcrc crratlc becausc of thc pre3cncc of flll and
thc vorylng typcs of undcrlylng solls. ln gencrall thcy conslsted of up
to 12 fect of flll In thc north cnd of thc slte to no flll In thc south
sldc of thc sltc ovcrlylng loosc to fi'cdlum dcnsc gravdlly sand to thc
maxlmun depth drllled, 40 fcct.
Swell-consolldatlon tcsts ihown on Flg.
rollr wlll scttlc moderately undcr loodlng.
Flgs. 4 through 6 Indlcate npst of thc solls
aflpunt of gravel.
Frcc lratcr wes m6.surcd at dcpthr 8 to 17 fect after drl I I lng.
FOUNDAT I ON RECO}IHENDAT I OIIS
consldcrlng thc cubsol I condltlons and tho propolcd constructlon, ne
bcl lava thc nrost dcgl rablc typc foundatlon r,vould be sprcad footlngs
placed on the naturel granular solls or rcconpacted flll. scttlenent
should bc wlthln tolorable llmlts, approxlmatcly I lnch total and 3/4 lnch
dl fferentlal lf thc fol lowlng detlgn rnd conltructlon dstells arc obscrvcd:
(l) Footlngs should bc placcd on thc natural granular roll belou the
top3oll and flll or on flll whlch has bccn rccompactcd and dcslgncd
for a maxlmun soll prersure of J,000 prf.
(2) 0n thc north sldc of thc arca whcrc thc exlstlng filr rr deep, we
reconmend that et leart 5 fect of thlr materlal bc removcd and
rcplaced und6r controllcd conpact lon condltlons. lf the matcrlal ls
part of thc roedway anbankmcnt, lt may have bcen placcd undcr controllcd
3 Indlcatc the flne gralnad
Gradat lon analysls rhown on
contaln an apprcc I abl e
-4-
condltlons; houcver, w! do not havc rccords of thls r€rk. Whcre the flll ls dcep, lt mey not bc neccsslry to renrov. ap of ,t, but at lcast 5 fcet of recompacted fl, shourd be provrded belou thc footrngs.
The remalnlng flll should be lnspcctcd careful ly to sec lf lt li sultabrc to support thc newry comp.ctcd ftr. Thls matcrlar shourd
thcn be rcplaced cornpacted to l00t standrrd proctor dcnslty.
cont rnuous foundatron wafts shourd bc werr rernforccd top and bot tofii to span an unsupportcd lcngth of at least l0 fsct.
Al I foot tngs should bc ptaccd below ,lrrost dcpth.
ff groundwatcr ts cncountcred ln thc excavat lon, clcan gravcl may be placed In thc bot torn to facllrtatc pourrng concrct.. rf watcr rfscs to thc bottorn of thc footlng, lt should bc ptrnpcd down fron bclow thc bottdn of the cxcavatlon untlr concretc has rcachcd rts rnrtlar curc.
I IIITER IOR FLOOR SLABS
Thc exrstlng flt ls probabry satrsfactory to support froor srabr.
Thc moro organlc portlon of the topsoi I should bc strlpped. 0thcrwlse,thc natural solls are capeble of supportlng llghtly loaded floor slabs.Floor srabs sholdd bc separatcd frqn bearrng war rs and corumns to mrnrmrzc
danagc duc to srrght drffcrcntrer settrcmsnt. Froor srabs shourd be
ssparated to smar I srzc unlts and rcrnforccd. rJe rccqnrend a mrnlmum 4-lnch laycr of clean free drelnrng gravet to hclp dtstributc thc load and break thc rtsc of caplllary water.
(3)
(4)
(6)
-5-
RETAlIIIIIG I.TALI
llhcrc the floor lcvcls arc spllt at tht rlsc of thc slope on thc
north, r retalnlng well wlll probably be rcqulrcd. Thc rctalnlng wall mey
be dcslgncd for latcral forccs cxcrtGd by an cqulvelent fluld wclghlng
t5 pcf. A draln should be placcd at thc bottom of the retalnlng wcll
laadfng to a sulteble gravlty outfell. Slldlng frlctlon cen bc tlkcn r!
.45 tlmeg the normal dced load on thc footlngs.
UNDERDRAIN
tf the lotcr floor of thc condomlnlqns ls wlthln 4 fcct of thG present
watcr table and should bc protcctcd by en undcrdraln systGtrr. Thc undcrdraln
systcrn should conslst of a pcrlphcrel dreln on thc lncldc or outsldc of
thc foundetlon wall wlth a draln plpc about 2 fcct bclo'tl thc floor lcvcl.
Thq draln plpc ghould conslgt of a 4-lnch pcrforatcd or oPen Jolnt plpe
surrounded by clcan frec dralnlng gravel whlch connccts to thc gravcl
bclovr thc floor. The draln should lead to € sultable gravlty outf.ll or
a sunp wtrlch can bc punped.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The follorvlng drelnagc preceutlons ghould be obscrved durlng con-
3truct lon and malntalncd at al I t lmcs aftcr the condornl nl r,nrs havc becn
qqnplctcd:
(l) Exccrslve wettlng or drylng of thc foundatlon cxcsvetlon should bc
avoldcd durl ng construct lon.
Q) Backflll around thc condqnlnlumc should bc nplstcncd and conpactcd to
ot lcast 90t rtenderd Proctor dcnslty.
(3)
(4)
-6-
Thc around surface surroundrng th6 extcrlor of the condomlnlumc
should bc sloped to draln away from the condornlnlums In all dfrcctlons.
Roof downspouts and dralns should dlscherge rell bcyond thc llmlts of
al I backfll l.
I{ I SCELLANEOUS
Our cxploratory borrngs wcrc spaced as closery as feas rbrc ln ordcr
to obtaln a conprehenslve plcturc of the subsol I condltlons; ho$,evar,
erratlc soll condltlons may occur batwccn tG3t holes. lf such condl tlonc
are found In thc exposcd cxcavrtlon, lt lr advlseblc that r,vc bc notlflcd
to Inspect t cxcavetlon.
RCH,/mbr
cc: Johnson, Vol land, Archulcta E Assoclates
2305 Canyon Boulcvard
Eouldcr, Coloredo 8O3OZ
N
P roposed
Dr i vewaY
Relocatlon
\
\
\
Scale: l/l6'' E lr0rl
Hole 4 o
4
.-2.-
\,V
\ \ Exr st lne
\\
\\
\*:
\\
\\,",,.,
\ Phase
\
Bur rdl
\er, l
\ et-tot
\
\
\
App rox i mi
Limi ts
of Fll
t Ing Drl veway-
-/
====:--
rlsting
rase ll
rl ldlng
ll: Fi rst Floor
l-100.0 Assumed
\
\#t3702
Flg. I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY HOLES
o
@
[.o o co 0,oF tn L!'
Cl .,, o oo o
-E N
x.-.rro ,-. O r^ L de z LCL Eo- C'I rf < a{|| x c vuoE ordEU!PPVCO g) C -O LC iU> O.
OF P +, >-(F! C-9aJ {rF O t,l- C l-E L) C (, O : (r- u u! aD LO+rL c o oa,O- +r >.Da G LF .|.r
=oa- |oo >v| tr lo rDo o t-C (JO-N
lJ4
=OO-
|
Gl a.\
L o{J GT E.E
-E+,\ru ..t -c c,IJ\!E
-CL o r!40 E OO >\t lr v}o s!qrF O U! C Et-a)O F o-t O tu cl rt ctc |,|
'O tD-L, l- tv Pt'llN o3 o- -EOL Ct IOF lD L Ur o! 3 0 T'vr 0, =:f ul c! L a, >rnoE |!-co'o .ct r-+, U ur C ! EOC O O E.- O tt u -, +, s o c, o+,ur ! sr ri Tt o Ll, o l,a) trro> a O !, O C- L () {t |J- 1- =-.--!, +,! \r Tr- U|C CcOO ->-rF +, o
q,
vr o
9r
IJ
It !o ()
/\o
=+r .J
O|,|
o-8
=o
0)F'o
a)i5
ql9 rt)-9E
c |!0
|J
tr o
L o
c o
UI
i,
o
t)
o (rl
o.o F
\O F\ .. . tl\O irsN . I
--or!ZO \t I lo \OC'O-N (\r=6o- |
\o f\ ..1 or.c
- crl
O r.-
f r | | ' | | | I I I ' | | | I I
q\o (rr o o
|J\o
LUT o5 40 E:oc
o. +,{'c vro u T'oL Fo
-a,LE !ro
e, 'ct L o-c !u 'CL ln- O tu I ct,
-+ 3 Oo to
fL +, -c tu t^ut 0.- O Flo U'I lrl I FI ol zl
o y|5
1'L
L
|!
(J
a)(,o L 4
tt o
o r)
e)
o E
!o -c io
..i€
F.!
tt\
t, o\-
- +l OT -.
t
o,
a)6
o .t- .
a., o\Fl o.=-l!
c!
.:r rtr
o
N
a, or Fll o.
-F trl
o N..T
|)01 Fll o.--| T
rt\
(\l rro
ol -.
l..J
E
3g
I
o o1 rl | | I | | ll
o o rt\Cl
t o
(\I
co
Fig.2 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY HOLES
lrrrrlrrrrl
#13702
|{
I
c 3 gt
vl
a,
a
l,L'
CHEN AND ASSOCIATES
APPLlgg PRC t!UFt - r.t
9rel l-Conrcl idotion Tert Rerultr
ta
I
c I 6 ll t,
e F
0
I
2
,
Fls. 3
l{olurol Ory Unrf W.rqht - I l0.l 9cl
Noturot Iorrlurl contanl - lll .3 garcant
pth 9'
}{olurol Ort Unrt Wa'ght - 9ct
l{ofsrol lor llurr Co^lanl r plrClnl
APPLI Eg PR E SaUR E - t.t
113702
l,rrr rxo Asro.,^r* I
Conrulting Soil ond Fqrn&tion Enginocr
!a
I
I
t
a
!a a t
I
t
a
ao
a<)
to
!
!o
c
!a
I
I
o t
I
c
!
I
a
-
I
cL/|r rt!^tr,cr to trLY tro_ r!.lr1cl
6R,.\'€L 39
Llctulo I lM I
5AM Pt € c,a
To t^"o 55
d t1a
G ravc I ly sand
o/o sr L r aNar a!-a!'
PLaa rtC l ry tt oe^ NP
raoxr HOle I
6 oio
7c
at dcpth 9r0r'
coaalII
I
aoaa an .rr
-T -t lil
CL t ra Soulrl O|fir
a rrra
cLly irtltt'cr lo ttLT rrq-.t.lr'cr
GFAVEL 23 o/o s,exo J/ 0/c 3r L r aND cLaY
LIQIJIC' LILIII 7O FLASTTCITY INC,ET
s,.MpLE o. Grgvcl ly claycy sand zioM Holc I
'\'i't t'a
ao
to
to
nt
ao
cotatat
20 %
%
dcpth 20'0"
Fl9. lt
ca- 2 113702
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
at
HTN
Cooulti4
CLIY,rrllr,C, tO tlt.l rto- tLrlt'c'
Assoc'^Tts I
Foun&rion Erpinom
AND
Soil ond
c
I
a
I
I
u I
I
t !a a t
I
a)i
I
a
!a
I
I
o I
i,!a a I
t
t
a
coalrIr
.R^VEL 27 To t^r.,,, 47
Lrcluro LrMrr o/o
saMFL€ o/ Gravcl lY cleYcY
7o sr Lr aND cLaY
tLAa rlc I rY lNoEx
sand , " o,,, Holc 2
26 1o
T,
.t dcpth 9'0"
cL^Y rr!.ll€l to tt!t rrc- tL.lt cl
.RA'EL 55 % saNo 39 7o slLr ^xo cLaY 6
Lreurg LrMrr % PLAStlcltY lNoEx
s..MrLE oF Sendy gravcl tno." Holc 3 at
@aall I
-lo
%
dcpth 4r0"
f13702
GRAOATION TEST RESULTS
Ff gi-15
!a a I
I
t
a
!a a t
t
I
I
HCN ANO
Conrulting Soil ond
CLty rtLrtt'cl ?O lrLt tlq-r!.lt'Cr
o,R,,v€L 32 To r^^,., 63
!f cluf o LtMf , olo
s-aMP!E or. Gravcl ly sand
Assoc'Arrs I
Foundo tion Erp inoo
coaaLl a
c !a
a
!
I
a
a
a
!a
I
I
i
a
% stLr aNo .LAY
PLAarlct rY lalo€x
TRoM HOlc 3
5 olo
T,
at dcpth !r0r'
ao
to
to
T
cLlY rr!^l'rcr to lrll r.q-r!^lr ct
cFt,^vEL 27 1o saNo 66 % slLr axo CLAY
Lf outo Ll}.tl t 0/o PLAsTICI tY II{O€X
saMpLE o- Gravcl ly sand ,"on Holc ll
GRAOATION TEST RESULTS
collLat
7%
%
at dcpth l9r0'l
Fl9. 5
ca.2 113702
I
u
lrl c
J
o
ar,
E
C c (
e
a
(,
1
c
.o
C o
UI
t,
o
()
o
o
C,
tt c o vl
.o
c o o
(,
o
a5
E c o JI
o
o
(t
l^J
lrJ
v,
F(:rO --o (, t/t ev, .uJ<o GAZ:
\o c J GI
\o rn .l
l!e.^
vl u',
E
o.
tf,V,C
!<n :- o-
U'
r9
=-
-o
:
ax.o
F
;
lrJ o
o F 6
lrj
e,
LJ
al,
J
;
a
F
I I
_l 39-z6l:-5p;i o o. aS
:Eb _l
o ;r---
:l-3iE
=J
F G z,_l
_l
e o>
EZ,-'Pur:
l 2)
t\
(\I
0l\l o
F
N l
J|rJ <c -l:S
<o z,
\o
€
\O]jl {
f Cl'\(\a l
ti.
T,,o5
o
O1
o
o
o
qr
o
-
o
c\
o
Or
ul
o
!
N .ir
(\a o t\
o 2
o o ?
6
F J l o
lrl
E
F .r) A 9u,'x F
x x -c ;o o uF
: ?r z)-o
Zl
EJ ;qL uo
tr'
f,o
DESICN NEVI]iI\/ I]OARD
ACTION
DATE OF iIILETING:
IIEMBIRS PRESENT:
VOTE: FOR:
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
ABSTENTION:
-"'APPROVIID : -. 1/'
-DISAPP]iO\ILD:
SUNIIAIiY:
o
MEMOMNDUM
T0: Planning Commission
FR0M: Department of Community Development
DATE: September 2, 1976
RE: Lodge At Lionshead Phase III
Building Bulk Control Variance and parking Variance
Lot 6, Resubdivision of Lot l, Block l, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing
Charles R. Anderson, representing the Lodge at Lionshead,has applied
for a building bulk control variance and a park'ing variance. The subject site
is located in two different zone districts, HDMF which comprises 29% of the
site and l'lDMF which is 71% of the site. A legal decision has been made to
allovl an averaging of the development requirements for each zone district,
ie. 16 GRFA for 29% of the site ana .SS GRFA for 71% of the site for the
aggregate total allowable. The same process was fol'lowed for determining permitted
wal'l'length, iiercentage of.required covered parking,
Based on these calculatjons, the permitted maximun wall 'l ength wou]d
be .|39.5'. The applicant has requested a wall length of 148.5'or 9' in excess
of the ailowable length.
The applicant has further requested la parking variance to allow lZ covered
spaces and 3 uncovered spaces. The requirement is for 14 covered spaces and l0
uncovered . spaces.
The proposed building consists of l2 condominium units of approximately
I '400 square feet to ,l,850 square feet each and a total GRFA of approximately '18,000
. square feet which is the maximunt GRFA allowable on the site. The zoning would al low
approximately 35 units of a smal'l er s.i ze.
Page Two o
lJe have asked Eldon Beck of RHB&A to review the proposed project, both
from an aesthetic standpoint and to review its relationship to and impact on S.ite
24. Eldon's review is attached
The Departntent of Community Development has reviewed the criteria and
findings provided for in Section 19.600 of the Zoning Ordinance and our conclusions
are as fo] I ows :
FACTORS:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other ex'i sting or potential
uses and structures in the vicin.i ty.
A. Building Bulk Control
The proposed structure is direct'ly adjacent to the proposed ice arena and conrnunity faciliiies structure. There are no other similarly zbnea vaiini sites in the vicinity except the Clinjc/Hospital site which is zoned MDI'IF. The applicant states that the Lodge at Lionshead I is lzg', phase II is ]60', and vail International is-240'. The proposed ice arena is approx.imately 200;. it,e applicant states the following'in support of the bulk coni:rol variairce:
" The physical configuratjon and natural beauty of Lot 6 place definite design hardships on the development oi the site. The southern half of the lot, adjoin.ing the bike path, is heavily treed and provides one of the most beautiful scenic corridor!in the area. The northern half of the lot is sparse'ly vegetated
and generallyunp'l easant in appearance. It js the opinion-of the owners, their architects and the Town of Vail's consultant (See
Eldon Beck's Memorandum) tfrat it is preferable to contain develop-
ment to the northern half of the property.
' Therefore, the proposed building was designed. within very l.imited parameters. l,lhile preserving open space and the natural quaiities of the site, we have been able to compiy with all aspects'of the
appl i cabl e zoni ng except the maximum l ength requi renents. The current design js slighily under its allorvable height and GRFA requirements. In rnany areas the proposed structure complies with . low density multi-famiiy standards -- specifically: number of dwelling units, height, most bulk requirements, s.i te coverage,
useable open space, landscaped areas, and parking. More significantly for this site the proposed design has S6i( less site coverale than allowable and l40ii more landscaped area than is .requ'i ied
under MDMF standards. Our useable open space is a'l so significantly
above the requirements. "
Page Three o
B. Par$g-!l1j-c-!9e
The applicant states the.folIorling'in support
relates to other uses and structures in the vicinity'
of the vari ance as it
"l. The Town of VaiI has informed us they may ask for an easement
across the northeasterty"poil]9n-ot 9!1,,pioBertv for inproved
access to and from SiLe ?'4' If we comply with Article 14' we
cannot grant such an easenlenr'
2, That portion of our property fronting Lionshead Circle has a
maior v.isual impact o. ti""'uni.ln."lio-slte.i+. It is the genera'l
opinion'6i_tno,bwrrotrave-si,aie.ltr.e.area,thatlandscaping
.utr-,"i'.tiin"i,i.ri"g -",ri u."p'.ierable. (See Eldon Beck,s
Memorandum )
3. The present conceptual plans for Site 24 indicate begjnning a
p"""!t.iun".;;;-i; irr. i.'r."sunL.ir-irea where our parking lot
woutd be feedins into Lilnsrr;;l"b;;ti*' creatins llqfil:1:l
traffjc vlould seen to be-lontra-productive to the pedestrlan
area ' "
2. The degree to vthich relief^from the strict'or literal interpretation
and enforcement of a spe.ltili"r"griition is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity-ot iieatmelt'9Ton9 sites in the
v'icinity,ortoattain-treibiec;i;;;oith'isordinancewithout
grant oi sPecial Privilege'
A. Bu'ilding BuIk Control
Theapplicanthasthefollowingobservat.ionsinsupportofthe
variance:
"1. rhe visual impact of the rtngll.tl l!: P::lottd buildjng'
where ever possible, trre uuitaing has been'rtiort"n up and landscaped
to de-enrphas.ize jts r.r!il."ih;; ii-particularlv true of that
potiion"'[i-ihu-uui t oi ns"iuii ng i!:..ii:.t1":etback whi ch has no
"uri'ion!.'"ir'un-zs-r.etanoisheav.ilylandscaped.
3'Thattheproposedbu.ildingconfigurat.ion..isthebestposs.ible
alternative to preseru!'it.-iluni. beauty and open snace-9l.lle
area because to reduce"tf't-f tnsif' 'v1o1ll^'cleate
far more serl0us
ramifications in the urei-of Uiitaing height' bulk' site
.d;;;;;;'ianoscaPea aeras and Parking'
4' That granting of the requested variance has been recomntended
by l'ir' Eldon Beck' tt"iliti"'ntir't:it"ti and consultant to the
Town of Vail'
5. That the design is cons'i stent with'the Declared Purpose of the
Town of Vail Zoning uiai'J.'J- in.iiir.".r, Sectiorr .l..l00), which
states ',TheSe reguiatilnS..u.. Jnuitud for.the purpose oI:':
the coordjnated and ttuirriot'io" developntent of the Town rn a
nlanner that would .o"r!.u.'ino .nr-lun.i, itt nutuial env'i ronntent" ' "
Page Four
o
Strict. design.conrpliance with the ordinance would necessarily
move the buildjng further south and require great site coverige,thus unnecessarily destroying parts of the scenic corridor.', -
B. Parking Variance
Two parking variances, Lionshead Lodge II and Vail Internationa12
have been granted in the immediatd vicin'i ty to pieserve landscaping or to ij'tow for additjonal landscaping. The Tovrn of Vail ii not providing iarling on Site 24,also in an attempt to preserve the natural beauty of ihe area
" Therefore we feel that such compliance with the ordinance
would clearly create 'pract'ica1 difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships'inconsistent with the objectives of (the-
zoning) ordinance (Article .l9, Section l9.ld0),'
3. The effect of the requested variance on light anc air, distribution of population, transportation and traffjc iaciiities, public facil ities and util ities, and publ ic safety.
A.
as it allows
There should
findings:
t.
B.
Building Bulk Control Variance
The proposed variance vrould have a posit.ive impact on light and air a greater portion of the site to remain open and in its natural state.be little impact on the other factors.
Parking Variance
Traffic as related to Site 24 and the proposed Lionshead Lodge project should be improved by granting the variance. Theoniy area available for iaaiti6nat
9n:!i!e parking, without encroaching on the heavily iorested area south of the bui'lding, is on the east side directly adjacent to Sjte 24 in an area where the Town.of Vail wili probably seek an easement for bus and pedestrian movernent into the Lionshead area. Public safety would be promoted by granting the requested vari ance .
4. Such other factors and cri teria as the Conrnission'deems applicable to the proposed variance.
Perhaps the most'important factor which should be considered is one of aesthetics. The building could be made conforming to the Zoning Ordinance in all respectst however, the appearance of the building and the site would be less desirable and in conflict with the master plan for Site 24.
The Department of Community Development has considered the following
That the granting of the variance wijl not constitute a grant of special privilege 'inconsistent w'i th the Iimitations on other properties or improvements in the same djstrict.
Page Five o
We feel that since the building could be constructed wjthout the need for any variance, there is no special privilege involved. The applicant has,.in_requesting the variance, honored the integrity of the Site 24 plan and the physical beauty of the site.
2. That the granting of the variance wjll not be detrimental to the publ ic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
|^le feel the publjc health, safety and welfare is best served by granting the requested variance.
3. That the variaRce is t'larranted for one or more of the followinq
reasons:
a. The strict or literal interpretat'ion and enforcement of the
specifi'ed regulation would result in practical djfficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent wjth the objectives of this ordinance.
. !"" the applicant's statement under Item I of the criteria. A physical
hardshjp is created t'n an attempt to make the building compatible with pians for Site 24 and by the attempt to nraintain the integrity of the site,
b. There are exceptional or extraord.i nary circuntstances or
cond'itions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply general ly to other properties.i n the same zone.
The site is the only heavi1y forested lot in the entire Lionshead area with the exception of Site 24 and is therefore an extraordinary site which warrants special consideration.
The Department of Conmunity Development reocmmends approval
requested variances in view of the fact that physical hardhsips exist
difficulty is created due to the proximity of the proposed ice arena
facil ities center.
of the
and practical
and community
MEMOMNDUM
T0: Planning Corrnission
FR0M: Department of Community Development
DATE: September 2, 1976
RE: Lodge At Lionshead Phase III
Building Bulk Control Variance and parking Variance Lot 6' Resubdivision of Lot l, Block I, v;il Lionshead 2nd Filing
charles R. Anderson, representing the Lodge at Lionshead,has applied
for a building bulk control variance and a parking variance. The subject site
is'located in two different zone districts, HDMF whjch comprises 29% of the
site and MDMF which is 71% of the site. A legal decision has been made to
allow an averaging of the development requirements for each zone district,
ie. .6 GRFA for 29ll of the site and .35 GRFA for 71% of the site for the
aggregate total allowab'l e. The same process was fol'lowed for deternrining permitted
wa1'l length, iiercdntage of required covered parking.
Based on these calculations, the permitted maximum wall length wou'ld
]39.5'. The app'l icant has requested a walt length of 14g.5'or 9, in excess
the allowable length.
The applicant has further requestedia parking variance to allow l2 covered
spaces and 3 uncovered spaces. The requirement is for 14 covereci spaces and l0
uncovered spaces.
The proposed building consists of l2 condominium units of approximately
1,400 square feet to .|,850 square feet each and a total GRFA of approximately 1g,000
square feet which is the maximun GRFA allowable on the site. The zoning would allow
approximate'ly 35 units of a smaller size.
be
of
Page Two
' He have asked Eldon Beck of RHB&A to review the proposed project, both
from an aesthetjc standpoint and to review its relationship to and impact on Site
24. Eldon's review is attached.
The Departntent of Community Development has reviewed the criteria and
findings provided for in Section 19.600 of the Zoning Ordinance and our conclusions
are as follows:
FACTORS:
l. The relatjonship of the requested variance to other existing or potent.ial uses and structures in the vicinity.
A.
The proposed structure is directly adjacent to the proposed ice arena and conmunity fac'i lities structure. There are no other similarly ti,n.J-uuiuni sites in the vicinity except the Clinic/Hospital site which is z6ned MDl.lF. if'"applicant states that the Lodge at Lionshead I is .|28,, phase II is .|60',
and Vail International is_240'.. Thg proposed ice arena is-appioximately 200;. The applicant states the folIowing in support of the bulk conii,rol varia-nce:
'l ltu.physical configuration and natural beauty of Lot 6 place definite design hardships on the deve'lopment oi the site. The ' southern half of the rot, adjoining the bike path, is heavily treed and provides one of the most beautiful scenic corridori in the area. The northern half of the lot is sparsely vegetated and generally unpleasant in appearance. It is tire opinion of the owners' their architects and the Town of Vail,s coniultant (see
Eldon Beck's Memorandum) that it is preferable to contain develop-ment to the northern half of the property.
Therefore, the proposed building was designed within very limited paranreters. hlhile preserving open space and the natural- quai ities 0t the s'i te, we have been able to comply rvith al:l aspects of the applicable zon'i ng except the maximum ieigth requ.i renrents. The current design is s1 ightly under its allowable height and GRFA requirements. In many areas the proposed structur6 conplies with 1ow_density multi-family standards -- specifica'l 'ly: numbLr of dwelling units, height, most bulk requirements, site coverage,useablg ope.n space' iandscaped areas, and parking. More sign'i ticantly for this sjte the pfoposed design has 56ij less iite coverage than allowable and 14oii, more Iandscaped area than is .requiied under MDMF standards. gur useable open space is also s.i gnificantly
above the requirentents. "
Page Three
variance:
B. Parkjng Vari ance
The applicant states the.following'in support of the variance as it
re'l ates to other uses and structures in the vicinity'
"'l . The Town of Vail has informed us they may ask for an easement
across the northeart"riy-poiiion of our_pioperty fgr-improved
access to and from Site,z|q.
-lr
we comply with Art.icle 14, we
cannot grant such an easement'
2, That portion of our property fronllng^tionshead Circle has a
majorvisualimpactonineLntrancetosit;24.Itisthegeneral
opinion'oi-inotb wno naie-sirai.o tt'.,urea that landscaping
rather than parking touii [e-preferaut"' (See Eldon Beck's
Memorandum)
3. The present conceptual p'lans for Sjte 24 indicate beginning a
oedestrian area jn the lame general area where our parking lot
ivould be feeding'i"il'-Li"tindia circte' Creating additional
traffic woutd sJem";; ;;-;;;iii-productive to the pedestrian
area . "
Thedegreetowhichrelieffromthe.strictorl.iteralinterpretation
and enforcement or "'rp"iiriLi-r"srtat.ion
is necessary to achieve
compat'ib'iIitv uno uiii6ititv ot tleatmelt amons 1lt91 ln..!n"
vicinity, o. to ut,uin-if'" i'ul"ttives of th'i s ordinance without
grant oi sPecial Privilege'
Bu'ilding Bulk Control
The applicant has the following observations in support of the
".l. The visual impact of the length.of the proposed, building
where ever porriur;: ;h; uritaing nui'u.uir broken up and landscaped
to de-emphatit.'iii'f""gtn' Thi: 'is particularly true of that
portion of the'uriioirs"iiii.ns the front setback which has no
wall longer tnun-is-it6t and is heavily landscaped'
3.Thattheproposedbuildjngconfigurationisthebestpos5ible.
alternative to'it"i"i"t lt" ""nit utu'ty and open tput" :l..il':
area becaus" totr"ir..'trre-length would create far more serlous
ramificat'ion, in' inl"it"i-or-uJitaing height' bulk' site
;;;;;;;;; ianasiaPea aeras and Parkins'
4. That granting of the requested vari ance has been-recommended
bv Mr. Eldon slck]"ittOitip" Architect and Consultant to the
T-own of Vail.
5.Thatthedesign.isconsistentwiththeDeclaredPurposeofthe
Town of Vail Zoning Ordinance tnriiiie i ' section l'.|00)' which
states "These ieguiations u" "nuittd for the purpose of' "
the coordin.t"l';;;-;;;;;;ti;;t developnrent of-t!g.|T1yn in a
manner that wo;t;";";;;;";; and enhance its natural environment""'
2.
,t
Strict. design.contp'l iance with the ordfnance would nece5sarily ' move the building further south and require great site coverige,thus unnecessarily destroying parts of the scenic corridor.',
B. Parkinq Variance
Two parking variances, Lionshead Lodge II and Vail Internationa12 have been granted in the immediatei vicinity to pieserve landscaping or to ai'tow for additional landscaping. The Town of V;il 'ii not providing irui[ing Jn ijt" zq,also in an attempt to preserve the natural beauty of i:he area
;" "ll":i::iiiil:!l rit:.:y:1, .:Tilt :ti;, :t': #""il: ::3!::,physical hardships'inconsistent with the objectives of (the-zoning) ordinance (Article .l9, Sectjon I9.100)"
3. The effect_of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic iacilities, -public
facilities and utjlities, and public safety.
A. Building Bul k Control Variance
The proposed variance ttould have a positive impact on light and air as it allolvq g greater portion of the site to remain open and in its iatural state.There should be little 'impact on the other factors.
B. Parking Variance
Traffic as related to Site 24 and the proposed Lionshead Lodge project should be improved by granting the variance. Theoniy area available for iaoit.ionat
9n;1tlle parking, without encroaching on the heavily iorested area south of the buiiding,'i s on the east side directly adjacent to Site 24 in an area where the Town.of Vail wii'l probably seek an easement for bus and pedestrian movernent into the Lionshead area. Public safety would be promoted by granting the requested vari ance.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the Corrnission' deems applicable to the proposed vari ance.
Perhaps the most inrportant factor wh'i ch should be considered js'one of aesthetics. The building could be made conforming to the Zoning Ordinance in all respects; holever, the appearance of the building and the site would be less desirable and in conflict with the master plan for Site 24.
The Department of connnunity Development has considered the following
findings:
That-the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent w'i th the limitations on other properties or improvements in the same djstrict.
Page Five
for any
has, in
phys i ca 1
granti ng
l'/e feel that since the building cou'ld be constructed without variance, there is no special privilege involved. The applicant requesting the variance, honored the integrity of the Siti] 24 p'lan
beauty of the site.
2. That the grant'ing of the variance wili not be detrimental to
pub'l ic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to or improvements in the vicinity.
l^le feel the public health, safety and welfare is best served by the requested varidnce.
the need
and the
the
properti es
3. That the variaRce is warranted for one or more of the follow'ing
reasons:
a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specifr'ed regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objeltives of this ordinance.
. 1"" the applicant's statement under Item I of the criteria. A physical hardship is created in an attempt to make the building compatible with piJii ior Site 24 and by the attempt to maintain the integrity of ttri site.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circunrstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply general ly to other properties in the same zone.
The site is the only heavily forested lot in the entire Lionshead area with the exception of Site 24 and is therefore an extraordinary site which rnramants specia) cons'ideration.
The Department of Contmunity Development reocntmends approval of the
requested variances in view of the fact that physical hardhsips exist and practical
difficulty'i s created due to the proximity of the proposed ice arena and community
facil ities center.
o
I
t I
u2 t1
'P
E
>x
o o
z d ,(
J!
rd >
r Et
5
x 'o
al
z
d.
{o
.?
(D
ior f.\1\
,1
?*ffiE
l*ruH*#ffig
at,
I e teEa?EaciiEta'#Hi Ffr kei"i ls;ial6-=Ez" h+
Hq F;at:af*e?a*li El
\ iIr[aiEEeaAai?;iar
e ? F: \ha e a E*eEigEe? e
-F? ?FiE?-??eE'*li ?\; :?lie eeEqiige?J\= :F*t; Ag1?AEE*a * \k €?ila Ai?eqai;;! x eEEfa ?gi*;asrE
9E Ptr lDu;
^:.;ic oo
Y. D'ge
7 el
_6' 5 ..5 5 7,'6 ls t\A
ts.ti- 6
ls-E
^o t-te I t3 rk, lbE 'tdrx 1i 3.
i* t\\i(tc-- i;' a 11\ l.- i -.,llir fJt 9 \\_) I *
lt\tr
IT. IE
=l'S, I .i iic\ Y EiS' *.o ;tt r. ;F[ IN:
I
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HERBBY GMN that Charles R. Anderson, representing
Lodge at Lionshead, had applied for a building bulk control variance
from the provisions of Section 5.506 and 6.506 and a parking variance
from the provisions of Section 14.601 of the Zoning Ordinance,
Ordinance No.8 Series of L973, in order to construct a 12 unit
Condominium building to be located on the Lot 6, Resubdivision of
Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Second Fili-ng.
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 21.50O
of tbe Zoning Ordinanee, Ordinance l.lo.8, Series of 1973, on September
2, 1976 at 3:00 P.M. before the Town of Vail Planning Commission
whose decision will be transmitted to the Town Council for fiual
decj-sion. Said hearing wi-11 be held in the Vail Municipal Building.
TOWN O}' VAIL
DEPARTIIIENT OI' COMIUUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Diana S. Toughill
Zoning Administrator
Published in the Vail Trail August 13, 1976
Wichita, Kansas
August 12, 1976
Mr. Chuck Anderson
Anderson & Martin
Lodge at Lionshead
P. O. Box 1868
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Chuckr
Please consider this as
required pertaining to
Vail in connection with
Phase III, Inc.
Very truly yours,
Albert L. Kamas, Secretary
your authority to execute all d.ocuments
the application, etc., with the City of
the planned project known as Lionshead
-= !{n Jt xqro o
=o*l 9 x,X 5
ar I\)o) F gEFS
d {r
(,r {
= T{ar J5 x(Do o
q.e,g ;
s$gg d <rt
Ol {
APPL ICAT ION FOR VAR IANCE
And/Or
CONDIT IONAL USE PERMIT
Ord i nance No. 8 ( Ser ies of 1973]
o
Pub I i cal ion Da-f e App I ication Dafe August 10, 1976
Hear i ng Dafe
Final Decision date for Town Councll
| (we) LionsHead Phase III. ILrc.
Heari ig Fee $100.00 /.1.
of P.0. Box 1868
I
I
i I
i
l
!
t
I
T
(App I icant)
t-
(Address)
Phone 476-27A0 _q- . Col orado Vail
( State )
do hereby request pe rm iss ion to
Comm iss ion to req uest the fo I low
(C ity )
aDpea r be fo re the Vail Planning
i na.|,,Y.
cle 5 Seciion 5.506
1^
x
X
Variance f rom Arti
Zon ing Change from
Park ing Va r ianCe
Conditional Lise Pe rrn it to allow
i n MDMF/HDMF Zone.
For the following described property: Lot/ tract 6 , Block
Fi ling Number €l&44-oot+l-t:t- 4 Lz;r + Stot< /.^ tz4rz/Ltat<.tt -sGC.<>^)a .Ez / rN(it- -€o clearly state purpose and intent of this aDDlication see attached.
What do you feel
attached.
is the basis for hardsh ip in th is case? See
Signat
PARKING VARIANCE
Purpose and Intent of this application:
Under article 14 section 14.601a we
spaces. 14 covered and 10 uncovered.
to reduce our covered parking to 12
are required to provide 24 parking
l,le wish to be granted a variance
spaces and uncovered to 3 spaces.
Basis for hardshio:
This request is not based on any hardship to the owner. However, in fight of the possible development of site 24, by the Town of Vail, the
spec'ific reasons for this requested variance are:
1. The Town of Vail has informed us they may ask for an easement
across the northeasterly portion of our property for improved
access to and from site 24. If we comply with Article 14, we
can not grant such an easement.
2. That portion of our property fronting LionsHead Circle has a
major visua'l impact on the entrance to site 24. It is the
general opinion of those who have studied the area that land-
scaping rather than parking would be preferable. (See Eldon
Beck's Memorandum)
3. The present conceptual plans for site 24 'indicate beginning a
pedestrian area in the same general area where our parking 1ot
would be feed'ing into LionsHead Circle. Creating additional traffic would seem to be contra-product'ive to the pedestrian
area.
4. The past history of the operation of Phase I and II of The Lodge at LionsHead would indicate that 15 spaces should adequateiy fulfill the parking needs of Phase III.
5. Should there be any overflow requirement from the building, the
main LionsHead lot could easily satisfy the need.
Therefore, we feel that this request is in the public interest and con-sistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance, Town of Vail, Colorado,
Ordinance No. 8, (series of 1973).
VARIANCE FROM ARTICLE 5, SECTION 5.506
PURPOSE AND INTENT
Under Article 5, Sect'i on 5.506, the maximum iength of a MDMF building
is 125 feet. Under Article 6, Section 6.506' the maximum length of a
HDMF building is 175. Based on the average of the two zoning districts
which apply to our property the maximum iength could be 139.5 feet' We
are requesting a variance of 9 feet to a total of 148.5.
BASIS FOR HARDSHIP
The physical configuration and natural beauty of Lot 6 place definite
design hardships on the development of the site. The southern half of
the lot, adjojnjng the bike path, is heavily treed and provides one of
the most beautiful scenic corridors in the area. The northern half of
the lot is sparsely vegetated and generally unpleasant in appearance.It is the opinion of the owners, their architects and the Town of Vail's
consultant (See Eidon Beck's Memorandum) that it is preferable to
contain development to the northern half of the property.
Therefore, the proposed buiiding was designed within very limited parameters.
While preserving open space and the natural qualities of the site, we have
been able to comply with all aspects of the applicable zoning except the
maximum length requirement. The current design is slightly underits allowable
height and GRFA requirements. In many areas the proposed structure complies with low
density multi-famjly standards. Specifically; number of dwelling units, hejght, most
bulk requirements, site coverage, usable open space, landscaped areas and parking.
More significantly for this site, the proposed design has 56% less site coverage
than allowable and I40% more landscaped area than is required under MDMF
standards.Our useabje open space is also significantly above the requirements.
Additionally in designing the building and requesting this variance, we have
taken into consideration the fo1 lowing:
1. The visual impact of the length of the proposed building' Whereever
possible, the building has been broken up and landscaped to de-emphasize
its length. This is particularly true of that portion of the building
facing the front setback whjch has no wall longer than 25 feet and is
heavi 1y landscaped.
2. The relationship of the proirosed bujlding to the surrounding buildings.
The requested length is consistent with the surrounding buildings.
The Lodge at LionsHead (Phase I) is 128 feet, The Lodge at LionsHead
(Phase II) is 160 feet. Vail International is 240 feet.
3. That the proposed building configuration is the best possible a'l ternative
to preserve the scenic beauty and open space of the area because to reduce
the length wouid create far more serious ramifications in the area of
bui lding height, bul k, site coverage, landscaped areas and parking.
4. That granting of the requested variance has been recommended by Mr. Eldon
Beck, Landscape Architect and Consultant to the Town of Vail.
5. That the design is consistent with the Declared Purpose of the Town of
Vail Zoning ordinance ( article 1, section 1.100 ), which states "These
regulations are enacted for the purpose of...the coordinated and
harmonious development of the Town jn a manner that would conserve and
enhance its natural environment.,."
Strict design compliance with the ordinance would necessari ly move the
building further south and require great site coveragen thus unnecessarily
destroy'i ng parts of the scenic corridor.
Therefore we feel that such compliance with the ordinance would clearly
create "practical d'ifficulties and unnecessary physical hardships
inconsistent w'ith the objectives of (the zoning) ordinance (Article 19,
section 19.100).
o
cfitut/NT,o^E g-7-76
-- lt44q.'?6 tu
l,4bg.5 fr
lft?-q.58 q--+t4-'
- l'17bb r4il',
Y (,776b f-aq-'
lt+1A.6b +1*--'' I,+t5.75fr ++? --
- l,V 7zb +*t
f ,737fr+<+ =
l,4t5.7qb r \+
lJq3.5tu <+t
l'u - t,717.5fr * 4t
llbtl.75 WrTrl- (*1.'
tflnp_EaP-
fetauAl
lh,oel .1q
a
'4.tr
&frk.
Nrf No-l
[t0.7
}lo'5
No.4
No.5
No.6
No.7
No.6
No'?
No;o
No.//
l,44l.za
t,166-9
1,473.5
I,*zo
1,420
l,+?7.5
1,451.75
1,97b
l,v7b
l,+n.75
[,8?t.z
ha47-5
-z
--
0n
to
(15
July 28, 1976
Mr. James F. Lamont
Director, Department Community Developnent
Town of Vail
P.0. Box 100
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Re: Design Review - Lot 6
Dear Jim:
July 21, L976, you and I met with Chuck Anderson and Tom Briner
review the project on Lot 6, adjacent to Site 24. My comments are
fol I ows:
The bujldable area was proper'ly defined as being
the north port'ion of the site. Retention of the
trees and relatively natural qualities of the
lower part of the site are essential . In final
adjustment of the bui'l ding, it may be necessary to
remove one small tree. This is acceptable.
To respect the site constraints, the choice was
made to des'ign a building slightly longer than
Town ordjnances permit,. In my opinion. this
should be permitted. 0pen space is gained, and
the fairly cornpl icated building appearance effect-ively so1 ves the visual inrpact norrnally generated
by a iong structure.
The nrost diffjcult site problem is that of accomod-ating parking. There was a possibility of tilt'ing
the bu'i lding to create either more underground
1.
Llnclsc.rg: drehitocts:
l.r r r r,l I'l;rnnirrl
I irb.rn l)csrgn
Rrrl ltl;rrrrring
l :rrvir','rtrlr'rtl.rl ltl.rrrrtirrr:
ltinciprrls:
R,rl'r'rt Rtr|rt,rn l:.\Sl \
Asx I i.rt,tnr('t{r..\SL/\
l:L|r'n llrt k ASL,\
Nr/r,r \i! r \\l .\
lortir (i- Allct \lA
lhlrici.r ('irrlislt,\sLA
Assrx'iirlt's: 125 lr'lillcr Arenuc
lLrroltl N. Kohrtr':rrlri ,\St .\ \lill \r:rllcr'
Rrrirr:rt i'. llattenon rtSL,r Citltlorrrur l,.l9.l l (i.\'n:r' W. ( iirr irr .tSL,\ 4 | 5 .181-:900
R(\ltrt S. Scn.r .\\l \
Mr. James F. Lamo
t
nt -2-
or surface parking in the northeast corner of the site. Tom agreed to study this possibility. i personally-would prefer to see open space ietained and a parking variance granted rather'than remov.ing trees to gain parking.
4. The design concerns were:
a. The quality of ,,front door,, and entry needs further study. perhaps extended wa1-ks,arbors, or other techniques would help.
b. The plant boxes on the north builciinq face are good and should be extended to include the center stepped portion of the building,top floor. Greenhouses on that roof surfjce
seem workable.
c. Wood trim, wood framed windor,,rs, perhaps woocten stair towers, are all desirable i-n aci:ent.ing the stucco wall surface. A1 though I didn,t'think seriously about thjs jn th6 meeting, a total vrooden st.ructure vrculd be handsome]
The building proportions and extent of glass
would seem to work equally vrell rvith vro6d siding.
It is expected that Site 24 will be primarily
constructed of lvood, 91 ass and stone, and it could be pleasant to see these materials used on this adjacent property.
d. A landscape p1 an vras not developed. The north side requires particuiar attentjon.
0verall' the building.design was quite nice, and except for sorving the park'i ng problem, the des.i gn direct.ion is sound
If there are any questions concerning my conrments, prease ret me know.
Sincerei y
R05T;i,i, HANAr,10T0,f,r? a
bh
cc:14r.
1,1r.
Mr.
Tom Briner
Terre.l 1 J. i"linger
John A. Dobson
Jily 28, L976
a - ..'a
*The todge at lirfFlead
May 1, 1976
Mrs. liana To u g hill
Zon j-n g Adnj"n is trator
Town of Vaif
VaiI, CL 81657
D=ar Diana:
Re: Lot l/Bfock f Vail- LionsHead Second Filing
You wi-LL recall that you once suggested that r,le have someone determrne
huw much residential space could be buj-.Lt on Lot I in accordancd with the
zoning of the old subdivisions frorn which the ijresent l-ot was drawn. We
gave the job to Richards Engineers, and they have conc.l-uded that the
zoning will permit .}8r095 of net residential fLoor area.
If you concu.r, would you ,Iease direct a l-etter to me indicating that
this figure is official as permitted by the Town of Vail. I would also
like to know that in the light of ihis limitation what the total
allowabl-e square footage of th= building coul-cj be.
,re axe getting ready for design wurk, and we want to be sure that our
basic assumptiuns are cortect. Throughout the design processr we stay
in close touch with the Town inasmuch as we want to cooperate in eveiy
way i-n the developnent of Site 24.
yc urs ,
POST OFFICE DFAWER 1868 VAIL. COLORAOO 81657 PHONE (303) 476-2700
o o
A SU,gDir//5/cN wri/c//
JF?
FI -&EJ td
-_--.::*9
--- '- "o-#:3_<
-rA:fi7;7=-Q34
/€A tv ,?,,ED/
i z";ot 10-,251.t.
aJt 25?.
/A//- Y/L/ AGE F1,E€r E ,ECOA'D F,/.flECTrorvS 6f 7, T?WNSH/F g gcUT 7/E 6Th' F,M -TCI4/A/ CF VA/L )E,
*-:
I .\t,I 5 ,gtf- G-":i*fgx- - Jjfu-.--
5,i \\R - ---:1-'4rtfu D:.ans
: a.t
(+
-+Ss,- -
/O/VSggAfr
'/)ea, t r<Ep U,
,ry 90' e'@'E
./H.90
o
I
I
1i
I
-,-
^.r -r r- -.i
t |.- --:-lt-! ('-' (
\ i(
': 1. I ,l lr- /r'i )- .r -r [ _. ,_-\ t---
't' I I ! _.r I t; I
'lj- t, -:-7
!. - -
_;-- |/\ / t. r I I /--\ L- )t I \ l . \ - > l-- i,. !
A t - c' l\/* | L r'
''."{- ' r i'-->
,, ). aZ ,'- ,- r1-l- l- )\' ,( /'. r
i./+ ,f i ..'-,(:'.
r-r Il -l
11r:tt:111
/a - -r ,, *: .,,}.,/ / /-/-,
,l'i I i -"1
J-1-,.' , .i r'--'(, t -r' ..'.'
-V tL 1 ''i" IQ
i 'l " . k''-t-
L Y; r't -JL-' l
lt K.'l
t 'a' .---
lt-,_t1./l
,'t ', | '/..,:)'{'/'' . /.;
,,? .; 1 ,ri /.t..1 . "11 \
" L."
i1 +, i, (..i
t -'t --t ,. .f / .. ->I i .- .l ' w"..)
rl
1 r-,1 z'r L f,[ll - Lt )| "-- t .)-: .,I r' L-.
i
1
DATE JOB NAM
MON
CALLER
TUES
INSPDTION REQUEST
TOWN oE AIL
//
AM PM
WED THUR FRI
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DISAPPROVED .
APPROVED
BUILDING:
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOOTINGS i STEEL
tr FOUNDATION i STEEL
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FRAMING
O GAS PIPING
O INSULATION
POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
tr FINAL
MEGHANIGAL:
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
tr ROUGH tr SUPPLY AIR
tr CONDUIT
tr FINAL
tr FINAL
CORRECTIONS:
DATE
INSPE
INSP}TION REQUEST ,.N,
TOWN OF VAIL
CALLER .,u.t k/.TUES WED THUR
,e7//-/
"/DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
I
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
EI UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
tr FRAMING
O INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
POOL i H. TUB
N FINAL
NAIL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
N HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:I
D^rE 5/4,?. / ??
DATE
I
JOB NAME /1
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM €tll€f,
E orHen
COMMENTS:
INsiPCCfrru FIEGIUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
rl /)
./.
fl pnnrtau LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
THUR
f}*p+-nov-Ep- - -----.,--*.fl.o+sAr.PRo'vt'D
-- ' ' -El ntfi{sP€€t.-
E- upolrl -lg e +oL+€w{N&€oRRE grtot{s:---
CORRECTIONS ', -",i' .tt -'.
INSPECTOR
BUILDING DIVISION
P. O. BOX 179
PHON E : 328-6339
nusPEcfloN FTEouEST
EAGLE COUNTY
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED- AI,'I PM CALLER
florHe n n panrrnl. LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
MON TUE WED THUR FRI
COMM E N TS:
AM PM
crir i.t l,V D C S.
InJ(JI.,U
;;,.FARTIAL
ll.ecAnoN:
:.. . :..i.
B eppRovED fl DtsAppRovED ! nerNSpEcr
EI ueor,r rHE FoLLowrNG coRBECnoNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
'NG DIVISION . rox 179
PHONE:328-6339
DATE
INsFEc?oN
EAGLE COU
FIEOUEST
NTY
JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
flornen n pnnrral.LOCATION
R EADY FOB INSPECTION
WED THUR TUE FRI AM PM MON
COMMENTS:
flnppBovED
n uporu rHe
CORRECTIONS
! orsAppRovED
FOLLOWI NG COR RECTIONS:
I nerNSPEcr
DATE
I NSPECTO R
o rNseeilroru FtEtluEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JoB NAME ,L n{. n/-,. t r-} i /i
IME RECEIVED AM PM "orrr a*;L" - i'r,,^, ,'
! orHen ! pnartal.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR ' TUE FRI AM PM
fl areRovED
El. uporv rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTIoNS:
f]orseppRovED ,[] netNsPEcr
CORRECTIONS --';
'/,1 ;)l ,-
-.t t;." -; i.., , ,, 1,'/
7.?
(:,
j..t 6--,': 7 DArE i A--
o
TIME RECEIVED-.-..- AM PM CALLEB
','...'.-
FTEGIIJEST
VAIL."
nvspEclorv
TOWN OF
DATE JOB NAME
n orxen n pnnrrll LOCATION
THUR MON
COMMENTS:
TUE WED FRI-AM PM
i
{
f,lnppRovED ! orsaeeRovED fJ nerNspEcr
f] uporv rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
i
DATE
INSPECTOR
oloo o" -]ururno*u gq**oroOo,
sHEEr I or' I
OATS: tz-rs-;7-TIME: t'. 3._-
FROi4:
NAI4E: D.rtu- Rn c,*u B n
COMPANY: Geul,,rui=l-e Fres uT rc11s \./ fo
rFn .
NAME: Mre. Brt-.- P1 rece
OOMPANY z Crtv ()F V at. - Br-or-
SUBJECT: Lorecre Ar Ltu^r.,.t=loc, Pr-*or r= m-
TOPTCS OF CONVERSATION:
R e ,rsh1frrru ? lr* ---fH n1 Tt+ e
DS 3F"ae * "c ouE- FteE l-)osE C,+e)^JFT lllrLL fuoT
?EvEiva 0 CCUPAN,\{ 6 F -T E+E ftBdvE 14r=w11rN€D BL')c-,
l5 {./-voFelTou} Tt-t1+1 TttE |'/2" /Japo /4osE
7eE OEP7., y',ELur AZE /,UtZau.t,St) .4/vD T/re
//tE C/tOt.vLT A//L-t- ,GE_ /I/ST-?LLEa hS Sog4/ E S p7J-S/
GRrI']NELL FIRE PFOTECTTOI,I SYSTEI4S COMPAI{Y, INC.
Dlstribution:
rNsrteCrclN
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED--- AM PM CALLER
florsen n pennal LocATroN
MON
COMMENTS:
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THIJR
FIEOIJESiT
TOWN OF VAIL
fforsare RovE D
Ruporu THE FoLLowrNG coRRECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
D nppRovED E nelNspEcr
DATE
rNsFE.lo*
TOWN
t:,'';t ,t
FIEGlU€ST
VAIL
onre .')'," i| -f " €'? JoB NAME
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
florxrn flpnnrrqL.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR TUE FRI MON
COMMENTS:
AM PM
! neeRovED D orseppRovED D nerNsPEcr
f] uporv rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
coRREcroNs 'ii:--ii: 1.;1, .-.- ,Jl;d.7i.a.:.,.". .(..
..7'' t'/' , ,'
D,ATE
INSPECTOR
j9P
UESiT
I-I OTHER
MON
COMMENTS:
n pnnrtnl LocATtoN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FBI AM PM TUE
,i
F{tFP RovED ! otsnppRovED ! netNsPEcr
tr]upon rHE FoLlowlNG conRECTIoNS:
coRREcTloNS l'.-,-z a !'a- ,,^' -/ -;.1-A/,.,-- . i' :'-ltir-t-.r,4 4==
tNsPEcooN
TOWN OF
FTEOUEST
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
E ornrn E pnnrtnl.LOCATION
READY FOB INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
n appRovED
n uporu rse
CORRECTIONS
! otsnPPRovED
FOLLOWING CORR ECTIONS:
! netNSPEcr
DATE
IN SPECTOB
ilusiPEcoN
TOWN OF
'': t.
FIEBUEsiT
VAIL
DATE
{ "-i TIME RECE]VED I AM PM CALLER
florHrn flpnnrrnl.LOCATION
JOB NAME 1""
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE FRI ' AM PM THUR
I eerRovED E orsnpp Rov E D fJ nrrNsPEcr
f] upoLr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
tNsPEGaCtN
OWN OF
FIEEUEST
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED-- AM PM CALLEB
E orsen
MON
COMMENTS:
! pnnnsl.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
-
WED THUR AM PM FRI
flneeRovED
fl uporu rue
CORRECTIONS
! otsnPPRovED
FOLLOWING CORFECTI ONS:
!REINSPECT
DATE
'INSPECTOR
tNtsiPEcoc'N
TOWN OF
F|EEUEST
VAIL
JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED AM PM CALLER
n oruen
TUE WED
I pnnral.LOCATION
THUR FRI I?M PM MON
COMMENTS:
il npp RovE D n orseppRovED I nerNspEcr
! upolv rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTlONS
,'i
DATE
INSPECTOR
DATE
TIME RECEIVED AM PM CALLER
JOB NAME
tNSPECC ctNl FTEOUEsiT
TOWN OF VAIL
n panrtnl. LocATloN E orHen
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI .PM
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
E nppRovED
[-l uporu rHE FoLLowlNG coRRECTIoNS:
! otsnpPRovED ! netNsPEcr
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
tNsPECOctNI
TOWN OF
'-.::
FIEGIUEST
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED- AM PM CALLEB
! orHen
MON
I pnnrtel.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
THUR
firne Rov E D
n uporu rxe
CORRECTIONS
flotsaPPRovED
FOLLOWI NG COR REGTIONS:
! netNsPEcr
INSPECTOR
. ., .:.. ---. ... .,.:.'.:ri* ..i,.i:,,,r.-F!,,ri,l - "'la:.{.i'-;l-.':!r'h. ., . - -'- 1^1-.;''''_i'r ' - :!-'_i" ua': _ - _ ri'
DATE
lNsFEcooN FTE(lUEST
DATE
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
I orH:n
MON
COMMENTS:
FRI TUE
E panrrnl. LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR AM PM
VAIL
! nppRovED ! orsnppRovED n nerNsPEcr
fl upotrt rHE FoLLowrNG conRECrloNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE ,")" (i ' f-7
INSPECTOR
ilusiPEcoclN
TOWN OF
FIEEUESiT
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
E orHen n pannel.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR TUE FRI AM PM MON
COMMENTS:
n nppRovED
I uporu rnr
CORRECTIONS
! orsnee RovE D
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
LJ BEINSPECT
DATE
INS PE CTO R
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED ,. AM PM CALLER
I orHen
TNSPECocTN FtEBIJESiT
TOWN OF VAIL
I pnnrtnl. LocATloN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR AM PM FRI TUE
EappRovED
n upotrl rHE FoLLowlNG coBRECTIoNS:
I otsaPPRovED I netNsPEcr
-€-i{
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
TNSPECOGlN FTEGIIJEST
. / i,'
TOWN OF VAIL
,. : :,) ,,,D,ATE JOB NAME
-lt tl-,
//r: t j/
TIME RECEIVED -- '- AM PM CALLER
! orHen
MON TUE
E pnnrrnl. LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED fiUR
--..0:)4-.i
FRI AM PM
COMMENTS: .
.F_J.aern ov e o n orsapPRovED
t-l
,LJ.UPON THE FOLLOWI NG COR RECTIONS:
coRRECTf ONS .v -:.
I nerNSPEcr
INSPECTOR
DATE
ilusPEcoctN
TOWN O
FIEBIJEST
I VAIL
', ';JOB NAME DATE
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM
I orxen
TUE
I pnnrral LocATtoN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR ,", ,." .,' ;' ' AM PM MON
COMMENTS:
! nenRovED I orsnppRovED n nerNSPEcr
I uporu rHE FoLLowlNG coRRECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
nuseeOroru
TOWN OF
FIEEUEST
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED AM PM CALLER
! ornen
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
! panrnr-.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WEO THUR FRI AM PM
n npp RovE D
I uporu rne
CORBECTIONS
n orsnppRovED
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
I nerNSPEcr
DA TE
INSPECTOR
rNsPEclroru FrEtllJEEir
f] panrrnl. LoeArroN
MON
COMMENTS:
FRI TUE AM PM
TOWN OF VAIL
oor, ?'r4'Ff' J9BNAME
Tf ME REcEtvE o -1-ii5:t_ AM pM CALLER
D orurn
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
"8,[etRovED D orsnppRovED fl ner NsPEcr
D upor,r rHE FoLLowrNG conRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
DArE '?" ldl ' ';'" ?
INSPECTOR
rNseetronl FIEOUEST
VAIL OF
E ornpn ! pnnrrll LocATroN
TUE
READY FOR INSPECTION
-
:,\WED THUR . ;-+'
! appRovED florseppRovED fl nerNSPEcr
f] uporu THE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
.- t t r--DArE '- r' / !, - .-i::J'---------7- -----
rNsPEcfrru FtEouEsir
fit
TOWN
rJ -:X
VAIL OF
{"!| L/l
DATE
TIME
JOS NAME . ,
RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
florsen E panrtnl.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
El-xP'p Rov E D I otsRpPRovED n nelNsPEcr
! uporu THE FoLLowtNG coRRECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
nusieecilpru FIEBUE€iT
DATE .:.. ./ ,
T|ME RECETVED -;' , --" -1 AM PM CALLER
TOWN OF VAI L
/.(.
.t / ){ &i-t; r
E orHrn I pnnrrnl. LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM
f
l't
r. .t
l- '-
.'7 l)t t
....i1.,.,'-, .-. ..'/rr1 ,....,n ..,.. J.!,-rt ; iz- ./ ,' ,r-J._!_{!tzt.('.--.2----------.-
,,r:.f'sPEcroR , i.
{ ur. ",n,o,*,
DATE
nuseeerGru FIE(lUESIT
vAl L -)TOWN OF
JOB NAME
CALLER
It
n orxen I pnnrtal. LocATtoN
W{irRovED
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED
! orsappRovED
t+,rnr l{J.r'nr-,''i*'Pt,
E netNsPEcr
fl uporrr rHE FoLLowtNG coRBECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
INSPECTOR
DArE f^/-rz
rNsPEcGrv FlEelJEEiT-*
F VAI L o WN
-
o T
T|ME RECETVED ,' AM PM CALLER
f]orHen I pnnrrnu
READY FOR INSPECTION
I nppRovED ! orsnpp RovE D f] nerNsPEcr
E uporu THE FoLLowrNG conRECTToNS:
99RfiECTIUNS----**---
D orHen
JOB NAME
PM CALLEF
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
rNEieecforu FIEOIJEST
flpaRnnr LOCATION
.,--t.-( rvr-o-rv ).. ,./
COMMENTS:
TUE FRI
ffnerRovED ! or sarr Rov E D fJ nerNsPEcr
N UPOT'T THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS
-'-a
/-.,
INSPECTOR
BUILDING DIVISION
P. O. BOX 789
PHONE: 328-6339
DATE
1) 'r)
nt6 e"t-c,?to N Fr E o u E s r
€ffiF+OJJ+I-TY {
JOB NAME
TIME RECETVED- AM PM CALLER
n orsen
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
I d'4€
flpnnrrnl.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUF FRI AM PM
flnneBovED
I uporu rne
CORRECTIONS
LJ DISAPPROVED
FOLLOWI NG COR RECTIONS:
!nerNspEcr
DATE
INSPECTOR
DATE JOB NAME
TIME BECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
! orxen
COMMENTS:
INSPEcTOTu FTEEIJEBT
n pnnrrnu LocATroN
RE.ADY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
f] pt snpp RovE D fl nerNsPEcr APPROVED
n upon rHE FoLLowrNG GoRRECnoNS:
CORRECTIONS
t ,.t
'i:;. .ti:
r,'1. rS;
-.
-_ t,
DATE 7'7
-7
rNsieec(foru HEBUE
otte 'Z.
TIME RECE D- AM PM
JOB NAME
I orHrn
COMMENTS:
TUE
n pannal. LocATroN
- READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM
LI-APPROVED florseppRovED EnerNspEcr
n uporu THE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
n\rsl'EcrGru FtEBlJEsr
E panrral. LocATroN florHEn
MON
COMMENTS:
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR 't/ ,fD,*(-_'y FRI
FPRo.y-€D ! orsnReRovED ! nerNsPEcr
a=/''III UPON THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:\
coRRECTIONS ' i r'..i:,, :':1 \/:.r"t.=
rNseecfbru
TOWN OF
FTEBUEstT
VAIL _-.
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED- AM PM
n ornen
! nppRovED
I uporu rse
CORRECTIONS
I pnnrrnl.LOCATION
FEADY FOR INSPECTION
E orsnppRovED
FOLLOWI NG CORRECTIONS:
fl nerNsPEcr
CALLER
TUE WED
DArE *,'-llt.- ?/
CTOR
tNSPEeGN
TOWN OF
FIEOUEST
VAIL -
florHen
MON
COMMENTS:
- -")DATE. ' .. ', JOBNAME
TIME RECETVED- AM PM CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
LOCATION
TUE FRr_*,ll_,
flpnnrrnl
E eppRovED
I uporu rne
CORRECTIONS
! orsnpp RovED
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
tl nerNspEcr
DATE
ilvsiFEcTlN
TOWN OF
FIEEUEST
VAIL DATE
TIME
JOB NAME RECEIVED-.---- AM PM CALLER
! orxrn fl panrral.LOCA TION
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM
E nppRovED
D uporu rue
CORBECTIONS
! or sarn RovE D
FOLLOWI NG CORRECTIONS:
! nerNspEcr
DATE
INSPECTOR
rNsPEcforu FrEeuEEtT
T'OWN OF VAIL
trnne Receivel- AM PM CALLER
OOr, .,, t .,; r ,' JOB NAME
E orHen
TUE
fl panrtlu LocArloN
READY FoR !NEtEeI!eN
WED THUR MON
COMMENTS:
U nppRovED ! ot snPPRovED ! netNSPEcr
E upottr rHE FoLLowlNG conRECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
t
DATE'.",i./
tNsPEcrGN
TOWN OF
FtEBUESiT
VAIL
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
.l
DATE '' .
E orHen
TUE
fl pnnrtnu LocArloN
READY FOR TNSPECTION
WED THUR .'' Moryi
COMMENTS:
E nppRovEs
i
n olsnpPRovED ! netNsPEcr
fl upol,r rHE FoLLowlNG coRRECTIoNS:
DATE
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
n orxen
lNSPEcr(DN FlEOUEsir
n pnnrtnl.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
FRt .-' AI)4 PM
TOWN o
'. MON':WED THUR TUE
COMMENTS:
EJ npp Rov E D
fl upou rHE FoLLowlNG coRREcrloNS:
E otsePPRovED ! netNsPEcr
CORRECTIONS
rurlbpecrod
DATE
ItusFECTGN FIEGIIJEST
V.AIL
DAiE - /' - JOBNAME j:
OF
-./
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
E orxeR I pnnrtrl.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR MON
GOMMENTS:
FRI / AM PM TUE
E nppRovED ! otsePPRovED
N UPOI'I THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
f] netNsPEcr
CORRECTIONS
' a...,- /" .. .*-'
INSPEOTOR
RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
n orHen
I
|NSPECTIN FIEBUEST
TOWN
....,'';.-''
! pnnrtnl. LocATtoN
dEApy FoR lNsPEcrloN
"'@l
JOB NAME ; ,,-z DATE
TIME
MON
COMMENTS:
THUR FRI
EIepp Rov E D ! otseppRovED fl netNsPEcr
D UPOI'I THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS
/
DATE ' i';:t,;','' ).,
-_--7_----7_i
INsPEcGN HEEIJEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME --*----]
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
n orxen ! plnrtnl. LocATto
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
! nppRovED ! orsereRovED ! nrtNsPEcr
I UPOI'I THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
CORRECTIONS
Il
I
;
DATE
TNSPECocrN FtEGluEsiT
t TOWN OF VAIL
''1'...-...,
JOB NAME
PM CALLER
I ornrn il pnnrtnl LOCATION
THUR FRI AM PM
TUE WED MON
COMMENTS:
TIME RECEIVED_- AM
I ot snPP Rov E D E nelNsPEcr
il aPPRovED
fl upon rHE FoLLowlNG coRRECrloNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE INSPECTOR
i'.;
t.
f'tNsPEGGN
TOWN OF
FtEBUESiT
VAIL.
JOB NAME DATE-_
AM PM CALLER TIME
I pnnnnl'LOCATION'I ornen
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM,
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
RECEIVED'----.-
flotsnPPRovED
FOLLOWI NG CORRECTI ONS:
! netNsPEcr
flnppRovED
n uPoru rue
CORRECTIONS
DATE
a
INSiPEGTItsN FTEOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME DATE
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
I orHen I pnnrtal LocArloN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PM
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
! otseeeRovED fl netNsPEcr
D nppRovED
fl upotl rHE FoLLowlNG coRRECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE