HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VALLEY FILING 1 BLOCK 2 LOT 4 LEGAL.pdf_corrupted
o
. DRB IPPI,ICAIION
DATE APPIJCETION RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
, 1;,
, .'. - I *****IIIIS APPT,ICATION I{ILIJ NOT BE ACCEPTED ITNTIL ALL INFoRMATfON
IS SUBUTTTED*****
.i ,.I. ' PRE-APPLICATIoN }TEEtING3
A pre:application neeting wlth a plannLng staff member is
strongly suggested to'deternine lf any additional infolaation is needed...., No appll.catlon will be ac
ft ls the applicantrs responsibifity to rnake an appointrnent with the staff to find
out about addltional subrnlttal requirements. Please note that a CoMPLETE applicatlon wlll streamline the approval
process for your proJect by decreasJ-ng the nurober of
conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL
condLtions of approval rnust be resolved before a buildinq perrnit Ls issued. Application wlll not be processed
without olrnerrs Signature.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
B.I'CATION OF PROPOSAL:
'Address
Legal Description T,ot 4 Btock z
c.
D.
NAIIfE OF APPLTCANT:2luto d &,vz- fu-soz*
Mailing Address:
Phone
R
e/67
NAME OF
Mailing
APPLICANT I S
Address:'MO 5. n
REPRESENTATTvE: fizez+r.1 ' /Srqnzl
Phone 47b -44si
E.NAME OF OWNERS:
8IGNATURE (8) :
Hailing Address:
Phone 47a -547A
F. CondomLniun Approval if applicable.
c. DRB FEE: The fbe will be paid at the tine a building perrnit is paid for.
VALUATION
$ o-$ 1o,ooo
$ 1O,OO1 -' $ 5O-O^C
95O,OO1 -$ 15O,OOO
9150,001 - $ 5OOrO00
s5Oo,OO1 - $I,OOOrOOO $ over $1rOO0,OO0
FEE
$ lo.oo t ?5"of'
s 5o.oo
9r.00 " oo
s20o. oo
9300.00
(0vER)
II. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING AI,L SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
A. In additlon to rneetLng eubrnlttal requi-rements, the
applicant nust stake the site to indicate.property
Ii-nes and buildLng corners. Trees that wll,l be removed
nust also be narked. Thls work must be conpleted
before the DRB vlslts the site.
B.will nornallY
Design Review
on at least two
the Design Review
who trave not asked to be republished.
exterior changes plane of the
... t.
'",'c.
'D; '' At tlre discretlon of the zoning adninistrator, the 'folloulng items may not have to be presented to the
Deslgn REvlew Board. They, hohrever, have to be
pres6nted to the. Plann,lng Department for approval:
a. - Windows, skYllghts and sinilar
that do not alter the exlstlng buildingi and
b. Building additLons that are not viewed frorn any
other lot or public space' which have had letters
submitted from adJoining property owners approving
the additlon; an4/or approval from the agient for,
or manager of a condonlniurn assoeLation.
you may be requLred to conduct Natural Hazard Studies
on youi property. You should check with a Town Planner
before proceeding.
E.
v,
Qazsua+ Easeerue
//?3 Qs614 4eaz, /+rz-
/pr //
Lor 4 Bcoaz-Z, hu- lQuey frz>rFtur,
/ay,a.ru,r Pzara'y 2et ue z,s
Brzz. /, /ltz //,tuzr frar
P*zte *brtu=ev
//A3 C+ztu Qz-az"e
l/+rt / ao 8/as7
,- 2r Brz"z 2r
P*a'
3€O
l/furt,
75 s.
VUt r
t/*rt (/*zer Ftesr
€ Seaw ,/a*,u*,V
/{fu.,rt U /4/ua4 ^b*e a 8/b57
Feouru-aa fup ///esr
Lar 3, 6cadg 2, t/,+tr //+zzcr /r*.
Dap*ca S /ezal &zaca
// ts- /bzarz-uee
Pa. Bax /347
t/att, Co 9/L57
Tzur a @, &r*e 2, L/zt. /rrt*a,- ItAFrrr*,u
l/ut- gQaaF Au,a+e;
TO U,
A s/a57
LIST OF !.IATERIAI,S
NAI,IE OF PROJECT:
T,EGAL DESCRTPTTON. t-Or :L BrScK Z SUBDIVISION l,Lr-rrFl ESr frza)/-=
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:*aarrroo ESTTrUq
PesloEtuaE
14Ato*
The following infortation ls
Review Board before a final
A. BUILDING MATERIAI,S:
Roof
Siding
other Wall Materials
Fascia
soffits
l{indows
Window Triut
Doors
Door Triur
requJ-red for submittal to the Design
approval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Ct4nE- TJ- 4 l,/huEAL
l/aao /l/ n oaat > - P+turEo
ll/aao Cuze- De* Srtnt
/l/&ra* Exr sn,tt t-.
Snpo Mtus -zt ll/*trz
FJrcnNh
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
FJ.ashings
Chirnneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.IANDSCAPING:
PI,ANT I'IATERIAI,S:
PROPOSED TREES
EXTSTING TREES TO
BE REI.IOVED
*Indicate
Name of Designer:
Phone:
/oeeete
Botanical Narne Cornmon Name OuantLtv Size*
caliper for deciduous trees. Minirnurn calio?f for
tree-s is z inches. Indicate height for coniferous
trees.
PLAfflI UATERIAIS: BotanLcal Nane Cornmon Name ouantity Size*
PROPOSED SIIRUBS
nxtstrNc sERuBs
TO BE REIIIOVED
*Indicate size of proposed Ehrubs. lrlininun size of shrubs is 5 qa11on.
Tvpe Scruare Footage
GROI'ND CO\rERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATTON
TYPE OR MEfiTOD OF
EROSION CONTROI.,
C. OTHER IANDSCAPE FEATTFES (retaining walls, fences, swimrning pools, etc.) Please specify. fndicate heights of retaining walls. Maximun height of walls within the front setback is 3 feet. ltaxLrnun height of walls elsewhere on the property is 6 feet.
t
t
I'IIIJTTY IOCITTON VERIFICATION
SUBDTVESION
TOB NAI,TE
BIOCK L- FII,ING l/ruilhuzv Frp,crhuwg
ADDREsS //1= Ce'ent Ct.
:nrc locatlon of utlutles, whather t[ey ba aaln tnrnk llnes or
proposed ll.nes, nust bE alproved-and verlfled by the following
uttllttes for the accompanyLng slte plan-
4 IPT
U.S. West Connunl.catLons
L-800-922-L987
458-6860 or 949-4530
publlc EerrrLce coDpany
949-5781
Gary Ball
Eoly Cross Electric ABsoc.
949-5892
Ted ltuslq/Ulchael laverty
EerLtage Cablevlslon T.V.
949-s539
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle ValleY l{ater - E Sanltatlon Dlstrl.ct *
476-7480
Fred Haslee
NOTEs
Authorl-zed SLcrnature
9-/l-qo
llhLs foto is to verlfY
locatLon. Thls should
preParLng Your utl'lltY
Lnstallatlons-
r PleaBe brl.ng a eite Plan when
watar & SanLtatlon slgmatures.
!,".rS JLJ"" \^/Y-eo
street
eetivlce avallabllltY and
be used Ln conJunction with
plan and scheduling
obtalnlng upper Eagle valleY
'lllrese verLfLcatLons do not relLeve the contractor of
hls responslbiltty to obtal'n a street cut peloit fron
tne rordr of Val.lr-Depattnent of Publl'c works and to
obtatn uttiltv 16cat-tonF Pefgfe Cissing -i-n.3ny public
@isenent fTt thg Town of vail._ A
ffi pemfuust bE obtaLned separately.
(
PEC MEI'0-Gorsuch [,Ja'l
6-22-79
Page Two
The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatib'i1ity and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity,or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special pri v'i'l ege.
To qy knowledge, a wa11 along the front setbackline in excess of
three feet in height has never been brought before the Planning Conrnission.
There also does not seem to be any specific reason for approving this wa11,
especially with there being a regulation which direct'ly prohibits it.
Approval of this app'lication would set a precedent for other walls of
this type.
The effect of the requested variance on'light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public faci'lit'ies,
and uti1ities, and public safety.
l,le forsee no adverse impacts on these factors.
such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to . the proposed variance.
No other factors are deemed applicable.
Fi ndings
The Planning & Environmental Cormission shall make the fo'llow.ing
findings before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of specia'l priv'i1ege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially .injurious to properties orimprovements in the vic.inity.
That the variance is not warranted for one or more of the fo1 lowing
reasons:
A. The strict or literal 'interpretation and enforcement of
tfq spegified regulation would not resutt in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship iirconsistent with the objectives of this title.
B. There are no exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the site of the variance that
do,apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
o . PEC l4El0-Gorsuch }Ja'|l
6-22-79
Page Three
RECOMMENDATION:
The Department of Conmunity Development reconrnends denial of this
application. There was a mistake made by this department when the
application was originally presented to the Design Revjew Board.
lJe, however, beljeve that there are not sufficient grounds to
approve this appl ication.
There was a compromise (that is enclosed) ttrat I made when this
mistake had been brought to r4y attention. l.le believe that the
wall should be redesigned to meet these specifications. i
( ',
rar
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BACKGROUND
The Department is recormended.to the l4organs
that a privacy
0n september 2'1,'1978, the Design Review Board gave_approval to the
Gorsuths for a Stucco Wal'l to go across the front of the,ir property
ina-exienOing a little way around the two sides. The wall as it was :
iip"ov.A it ihis time waito be six feet in height with.pillars and
Sliei s'lightly in excess of six feet at the driveway and walking
access points.
0n lhy 23, 1g7g,I was jnformed that Mrs._ Morgan had.cal.l.the Bui'lding :
DeparimenI wantinq to know if Dave Gorsuch was permitted to. construct
tfrii ri* feei wali. It was a! this tjme that I fjrst saw the p'lans' -
and realized that an error had been made. The Zo.ning 0rdinance c1 early
ititei in Section 18,58.020c that no wal'l sha'll exceed three feet in
treigtrt within any required front setback area. This section also states
itai tt'. wa'I1 ca-n Ue'no greater than six feet in height in any required
side or rear setback.
I then informed Dave Gorsuch that the wall could not exceed three
i"et-itong his front property line- After further discussion' we
reiin"a a'comprom'ise ltrat would allow the wa'l'l along tlg front property
'line to be no greater than 3* feet. I fe'lt that the 3* feet was
uil"piili" aue"to the epor itrat haa been made when it was presented
lo th" Design Review Board in September. 9n I'hy 24' 1979,.1 gave ..
Dave Gorsuch Staff approval to pioceed with his wall according to the
amended p1an.
0n June l,.|979, a letter (which is enclosed) rnns received-from the Morgans
which appea'led my administrative decision. What was appealed wasonly. the
iix ioot'wa]'l on-the side which faces their front entry way. In meeting
with the Morgans yesterday at thejr house on Cabin Circ'le, it was shown
to me that tfre viLw from iheir front entryway would be considerab'ly.
Uiol[.4 UV this six foot wall. Part of. the problem,.according to lfe
t"to"o"ns. is the closeness of the Gorsuch garige to their property fine'
i['p"""ioui viriance permitted the garage-to be within 5* feet of the
property line).
RECOMMENDATION
VAIL TOI^IN COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR/J IM RUBIN
June 5, 1979
APPEAL FROM MR. AND MRS. GEORGE MORGAN ON A STAFF APPROVAL
OF A STUCCO WALL ON THE GORSUCH PROPERTY
of community Deve'l opment be] jeves that a compromise so'l ution
l.le feel that the i,rall at 6 feet h'igh would be detrimental
viels from their front entryway- We, however, also fee'l
wa'l I is a perm'i ssable use. Our recommendat'ion is for a
r
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED THIS SPACEI THIS IS YOUR PEBMIT
PERMIT VALIDA
lrv,z9'
I'
APPLICATION "z I-r-
Jurisdiction of
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only.
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION
WHITE - INSPECTOF
. LE6/lL
I oE3Ci,{L__.llEE arracHro tHrrr)
c,z-2./c4l ,/.rrz-2tP
/ (,s-
'r/ Z:;--7"^';2:;
AFTH ITECT OR D E5I CNER MA|L ADOiE6S 'PBON!r.lc ENSE ito,
NCINEEi MAI L ADDiEIS PHON I LICENSE NO.
LJSE OT BUILOING
8 Class of work:D AODITION tr ALTERATION tr REPAIR N MOVE tr REMOVE
d7r tS t c</z*Zz-
l0 Change of use from
11 Valuation of work: $ 25aet), ri)'tt a u
PLAN cHEcK FEE // .v o z,e0 PERMIT FEE -< J
SPECIAL CONDITIONST
Slre ot Bldg.
(Total) Sq. Ft.
OFFSTREET PARKING SPACEs:
NOT!CE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB.
ING. HEATING. VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC.
TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF
CONSTFUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR AEANOONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WOBK IS COM.
MENCED.
CANARY _ AUDIT PINK - APPLICANT GOLDENROO _ TEMF. FI LE