HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 9 LEGAL.pdf44ii$l.?$if €ttl$F{€rrt
Design *.sview Board
ACTISil FOR,},I
D€parirnent of Corn${rnity De?€lopment
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colarado 81557
tsl: 970.{79.2139 tzxl. 97*.479.2457
xeb: wwu.vailgcv.com
Project Name: MARISCO CHANGE
Project Description:
FINAL APROVAL FOR DRIVEWAY CHANGES AND GAMGE CONVERSION
Participants:
owNER MARSICO, THOMAS F. & CyDNEy O2l04l2O0B
1200 17TH ST 1300
DENVER
co 80202
APPUCANT MICHAEL SANNER, ARCHITECT 02lO4l20OB Phone: 970-926-1125
P.O. BOX 1498
EDWARDS
co 81632
License: C000001547
ARCHITECT MICHAEL SANNER, ARCHITECT 02l04l2OOB phone: 970-926-1125
P.O. BOX 1498
EDWARDS
co 81632
License: C000001547
CONTMCTOR SCULLY BUILDING CORP 0ZlO4l20OB phone: 376-1807
PO BOX 2300
EDWARDS
coLoMDo 81632
License: 890-8
ProJectAddress: 382 MILL CREEK CR VAIL Location: 362 MILL CREEK cR
Legal Description: Lot: 9 Block: 1 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1
Parcel Number: 2101-082-4900-6
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
DRB Number: DRB080026
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approval: 03/05/2008
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
DANTAS
GILLETTE
5-0-0
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
-
:.4
Change* To The Apprnvee *,rans
Applicatisn fsr Sesign R*tsiew
l"]*',)41.t'.\:;t i:- +i':)ji'iituIiiq i;;1'rii1,;iii,ii:r:
;,':i $*f * iirLr:t'il{ n;nJ, Vnl;, i,,.'j,.r:l*r li iil-i j'
t*:, *l[."r;t.]iiS 1!x: *li, ;i7*.?d.S{
'j!{* : li,:ri{' .J+ili' d!,,r ,-:i.ll il
D1"{.lpq^Q***. {{:*ni*r* f*gi*r {r,,, &rses$$rdt p?&3?&-S6qS fr>i panet no.}
t?0 fur rerisians to p{ans alr€ady approved by Planning 5taf ci th€
0erign Revlew 8oard.
.i
i '- t"euticnsftheprsp*sall ro* 11 gbc,.,:^*f--:;*tij;';,r;i,:'r,:-VA\L*-$!LA*2E---I369IA+
Fe{r],{}T t*{i"i
T*,nit,1tr:; , . ,.
-. *vrn*ri*] Si6n* rur +r{s} I
illanr* *f &papll*x*t:
Itpe of Revier* and Fee:
9. Opnqes to Aor/o,ied Plans ./\-
$ulnrlttal lsquirernent*;
3 S€ts sfPlansAddrersing proJed Changes
Signah:rc of Hornegwne(s) or Association
F:lael*dFOfrtlt\PemilsiFlaqnirgi0RAidrb*ch3t$e*b*stpr0ys{J!r".$*1.-pflgs*oF"f t "Agc6.dac
**** ******* ****+*******************+**************** **+****** + * * * * * * * * * * ************'i'f 'i,i** * *
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement
* ** ****** * * ********** * ** ***:t**** ******** ************** * * * * * * * * * ************* ****+t*** ** *****
Statement Number: R080000138 Amount: 920.00 02/04/2OOgo4:10 pM
Pa)ment Method: Check
SANNER, ARCHiTECT
fnit: ,JS
Notation: 2114IMICHAEIJ I_'.
Permit No: DR8080026 1}4>e: DRB-chg to Appr plans
Parcel No: 2]-0L-082-4900 -6
Site Address: 382 MrI,L CREEK CR VAIL
Location: 362 MIL,L CREEK CR
Total Fees:
ToI.aI ALIJ Pmt,s :
BaLance:
$20.00
$2o. oo
$0.00
This Pavment,:$20.00
******* ***{.******** **************** * * ********* **** ******* * * + * * * * + * ** *****************t*++***
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Doc-rinl-i.\n Current Pmts
DR 00100003II2200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES 20.aa
\1^ow
+s2-*4\\r-' a1
VAdL TQ
4t w k*"'Pttl*! { /'Yz'g^
Cab.b *<)
* nNrrouE sALMoN GRANITE
Anrique sarmon Granire o*ce fottned trre '' ll:T11,,'jll,xlffI?HJ:;,"lTJ:::l
,".i], o,Jn"t a.d rice threshrnq platlorrns Y"9"t":lt:';.=;;u" ,"",u," marks, where r
of South chirra' I lre raprd LrLrildine of tities' S:i: :::;;t;"iti*J q'oou"' ro' s'"ot"t
freewavs, and bridecs ovet the past t\r'o f:::il;;;; ;;;;'' veats of
'vear
decactes has ted ro rhe replacernef t of mtr{h :l:::".1;":; ,"*,,,*, roou,n!) rhe upwarcl
of this material with concreie at'\d asplralt. tY -t:.,5 We sort Aptique Gr.rnrt€ rrxo
our feclamarion reams work ahead of rnajor otl llli'";""rr, 'iurnlon
.rnd Pewler for
inlrastrtr'tLrre ptojeLts' suclr 'rt ttre expansiotr t*:
--t:::; .f,].,.jin"l .,4l".'t Iange,materirr
of a pott faciliry in Guansdong an<i tlre :"J:l'1]";;;";, a'nd asn AntiqLre Grarrite is
building of apartmeirl tn*olu*"' in Fujiart is bronzej
set at 4'5" thi'kness ot q;attr;eo 'rnd
'tlre surface of Antique 5amon Gratlite boasts t::l':11:
a tich tlatural pot'nu |.u'uh"1g from centuries r.nortal sel
Rttrltlt,s
A tt ctl t ttl<:'tttti'l t-
S roNll
NrliLR,{1..S1()NIi l1'\ ll x1\
RECOMMENDED
PAVI NS / PLANKS
VT NTTR
\TAIR BIO( K5
i)r.JOlNs
U5E5
\ll t.5
POOL 1l I
201I FIAsT Ol'lvl'' s'rRl)'li'l'
s l:.^'r'rllj- ' WASHIN(;TON 98122
jr,,t. ,u,t.,nn.,nt), l:Ax 206 7o9 3003
toutw.rholcs <tr{
Rtt<lDt,s
A n. c H t t ti c't't.i tt ,l t-
Slo u t-:
N;u ttfiz1r S7oNL llxlFRTs
20t l EAST Ol-rVr. STR!lET
SEATTI,I.:, WASHINCTON 98 I 22
TUl. 206.709.3000 FAX 206.709-3003
nww-rhodes.org
MATEN IAL SPECI FICATIOl{ 5
C(TUNTRYOT ORI(ilN : China
COLoR RANGT I pink - salmon
STANDARD PAVINC SlZts i
pavers' I 2'x 1 2'to 24-x 24": 4.5' thick
planks - 30"to 90'x 9' to l4'; 4.5-thick
slarrblocks - 24'to 72'x l4"to 15.5':5.5"thick
pool rile - 2'x 2'and 12'x l2'; 05'thicK
!
$+ Pi-"lii !{{.t ' f,e t"1 c:"1r*'L--
4r,^,'
|lT8( AIIO PATH TIOHI
1505$ Low |/oltage (12 vott)
Te{tu red Aft h itectu ra I 8fi ze
r durable aluninum constftiction . 18.5-W. lamp included . 2fi" dir. x 4" hgt.
*4tu ".lflf:fl:t- d I tr-: t*'€,---
n .-i.{. ..,
tenYu c L$ts $TEP UCfiI
15070 low voltage (12 volt)
Text u N. Atc h ite et u r a I I n n ze . stanpsd aluminum faeeplate tvith steel
KTcHLER" 301
-
cctl uct{IrM
Low voltage {12 voit)
I Architectutal gnnze, Beach,
l Elack, fatured Verdigtis or
I f/hite
st aluminum one-piece construfiion
,lamp inclrded
ride:2%'hg. x 2%" €xtension
| fio. Aes.330t'03: Cafla.ia pdtent No.
@a Cestgn Re€i3tetton Nunb$ I26dBs
TAII{ IUTIP ACCENT
.ovr voltage (12 volt)
'rcelain
ess steel mounttng bracket
'. lanp included
Yide l 2[" hgt. x 2X" e]t€flsion
FTl}fiAT Bt}UQUTT
15068 low voltage (12 voll)
Multi-tolor
. Tjffany with solid brass bact plate
. 6.5-W, lamp included
t 3%" wde x 2h' hd.. x l1A" deep
r.ouvEnt! s0tv Lt8flt
15086 tow voltage (12 !olt)
Textu N Atc h itectu n I Bronze . dre-cast aluminum
o 6.5-l!. lamp included . I ,4" square x 6" hgt_
FILE r;/,PY
Departmmt of Cornnuniry Deuelopment
75 Soath Frontage Road
Vail, Colorad.o 81657
970-479,2138
FAX 970-479-2452
utwu. uailgou. cotn
February 18,2008
Michael Sanner, Architect
PO Box 1498
Edwards, CO 81632
RE: Marsico Residence (DR8080026)
362 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village Filing 1
Dear Michael,
The Town of Vail Staff has reviewed the design review application for the proposed garage conversion
and driveway improvements for the Marsico Residence located at 362 Mill Creek Circle. The following is a
summary of the comments from this review:
1. Submit existing and proposed GRFA calculations, including red-lined plans, verifying that the
garage can be converted into GRFA.
2. Site and Landscape Plans:
. Provide a site plan at a scale of 1"=10'or 1"=20'.
. Show snow storage areas (within the property boundaries) and area calculations in
square feet (min. 10% of heated driveway area).
r The portion of the heated driveway located within the Mill Creek Circle Right-of-Way shall
be on a separate heat zone.
. Show all required parking spaces with a 9'x1 8' box for interior spaces and a 9'x19' box
for exterior spaces.. Show the proposed limits-of-disturbance fence and any erosion control methods.
. Flag Note #4: the stone curbing must be flush with grade from street edge of asphalt to
the property line.
. Flag Note #6: provide a plan showing where the transplanted trees will be planted.
. Demonstrate compliance with the site distance requirements of Title 14, Vail Town Code.
3. Submit an arborist report describing how the existing trees to be preserved will be protected from
construction activities and how the tree survival will be ensured when the driveway and snowmelt
system cover the trees' root zones.
4. A Revocable Right-of-Way Permit will be required for all existing and proposed improvements
within the street right-of-way.
This item is scheduled for review by the Design Review Board at its Wednesday, March 5, 2008, hearing.
Please submit revisions addressing the above listed items by no later than Noon on Tuesday, February
26, 2008.
{p\n""uoo*r^
SCULLY BUILI}ING CORP'
P.o- BOx 2300
EDllgARDS, CO 8I632
(9? o) 37 6 1 B 07, FAx- 926' 4A03
FAC STMILE TRANSIIITTAL SIIEET
ro: B* G;hsu"
FROiL
I\'fdScuIlY **
e/gcr/o (
S6ilyBddiogCocP
FN( NUMDER q7? -ffi oens rgrcneNcg N u NB gR:
PHODIB NUIdBERi
V OII;RNEF'EREI{CE NUMBBI:
Re 34rJ, 1l; llAr*rC'*P
K,Bport fron i .I ?* c,/s,on t'rcq /)atkS X Noles,lcore'ts$rs
Bu,
?r'"* -
/Ari'n/ /4''t 'a'{*^ JoJv
!'o e00tr926-016 ^llncs
lrBl Eeg:lL 80 9Z qel
Lodgepole pine (doubb-stemmed)
LocaCion: West ofwest property line, according tD 1221-07 MLS Site Plan
Di"meter: Both stems are 5" Dbh
Condition: East stem is in average condition- West sterr exlribits exteme loss
of trunk bark from porcupine feeding many years ago. A moderate infestation
ofneedle scate insects is present
Aspen (single-stemmed)
Location: Adje€dtopropefy line, west ofgamge sbirway-
Dimret€r:3"Dbh
C.:ondition: Fair/poor. Bark is also infeeted with willow scale'
Blue spruces (two separate trees)
Locafion: Both spruces ale located i'nmedidely west of driveway.
Diameters: North tree is 8"Dbh. South tree is 7'Dbh-
Condition: Bofh trees are in ftir condition. Sparse density oflower brmches is
and indicator of sipificant post-plating strres$ South tree bas sipificant
phloem restric{io'n scre trom peviously encircling/embedded wir€ d ?-ft
heighl Heavy evidence of past needle scale infestation is pesent but reaeut
armual gowth is fiee of aew inf,estdion,
Tree preservati o n vers us remoya l/replacem ent
Mufti-st€mmed cotlonwood: Although roots radiate outward (primarily within the
top 16- of soil) a disance of20 to 30 feet from the tunk, the critical root zone is
wi-thin the f"si S fe"t ort*u'A frsm fte root mila/- For constnrction 1ruqposes, a
Limit ofDisturbance (LODf tbat is 5 feet fiom rh€ root oollar ofrhis tree will
have minimal impact to loog-tam tree h€dfi Any soil dishrrbance tbat is closer
fhatr 5 feet will have advqse long-tcrm iryarts rryon this cluqr of cotionwood
steirs. For eirmple, I was asked to rcspond to the impapt frat a 2-ft (ftom collr)
LrOD would bave rpon tbc surrrivabitity of lbe trree- Aoswet This sce'lario would
cause insipient decay of the root crown, sigEificant decline of ths clcest stqn,
md possiblc m4romiscd stabiEty- Apin, I reconrmend. a lft (ftom coltar)
LOD. tfconstruction plans necessitalc a closer LOD, then I reoonnend re,noval
Two blue spruoes: Atthough both ofthese spnrces rt capable of beiag
tansplauted u/ift a 9fi' tres spade, I do uot reconmend relocating these lrees. My
primtry reasotr frr rhis recommenddion is lhat the foliage density in rhe lorrer
crour is too sprse to pnovide pivacy sorpening and aesthrric appeal,
Roc colla (root 0arc or root crowu) - A poid at lrEe basc rryhere a m.in buttrEss root and thc fink merge.
' Limir-of-Disnrrtancc (l,oD) - A border th replrsec tte closc* point turrds a tnrnk at sh.ich srrfrcc soil will sustain distubace from an
xcardixr cu! ova-acavaticm, soil trycdng gradftrg tcnching, addition of fill, or machinery tmffc
0'o e00tr926-016
^llnos
lrpu\ Wein B0 9Z qeJ
SCULLY BUILDING CORP
P.O. BOX 2300
EDWARDS, CO A1632
(9?o) 376 1E07, FAX-926- 4003
FACSIMILE TRANSIIITTAL SITEET
TO:Ff,OTL
I\4a* Scullt
(];kou
COMPANYI
SculyBuililEqg
FAX NUMDEE
D.i\TE
Hr"/o
q7
FI{ONB NUMDSK
T-,
^
YouR RETTERENcE NUIIBBR:
Re .7ua /1; tl L'rnK (i'rvla
X n ores/corannNts ^""'*'*7)/or+ 'F.n 1
'fr" cls'|or.fon h)ork,'
Bu,
?P'* -aJ /4rc '"&'o' t'/r'J7"''
7UU'n/ '/4'o -a- ('$ d'Jv
_frn.a.fl*,,
?
---.-*---
!'o e00h9z6{1.6 I;lncg 4e61 eee:ll 80 9z qsj
Lfee_
Worfu,ffi6 .'ilait, Cotoroto 81658 '926-it91
February Z5'2O08
Mr, Mark ScullY
Alpine Mountain Builders
POB 69
Edvrrsdc CO 81632
RgMarsicoResidenge,36zMllCr,Circle:Pre.constrrrctionte€eyaluation
DearMrk,
I met wifh you and Michael sanner at tte Mersico residence on Fridan 242-O8 to
dl*,"- proposed impaets t t"o "Aju"*t to the driveway' This report will
Ao"t -"it iv finditrb and summaize our discussions'
Assumptions & Limiting Gonditions
1. Insprction oftrees was limit* to readily visual portionsof -
,'!t" and
""oopa",ulo*,._*o*t"*'tsof2'to4'heigh]"Anypossibledefectsbelow the snorv levels camot be evatuated until the srow melts'
2.AnyopiniontrdlrcndErooncerningproposedcoustrrrctionimpactsto
tre€s assumes the locatioo swrrey of-each individualtrunk oefter is
accur& (plus orminus 6J at one foot above grade'
Tree lnventory
Iwasasksdtoreportonanulti-stemmedtrreeeastofthedrivewayand5trees
west oftre driveuray. Here ae my findingp:
Nanowleaf cottontlvood (Multi+ternrned)
Ination: East of drivewaY
Diamerter: Four stem.s at 11" Dbh eash
Condfion:aw",ee.I"fi"i-o-mouEfsofdeadwood.Mirrormechanical
trunk wound above. l(tsft heighl Ail stems hsve sigpfficaottnnk sweep which
increases leveragp putl on tI base. Soundness of base cmnot currcntly be
assessed due to snowad ice.
Aspen (double-sErnmed)
Location: Adjac€nt to SW comer
Diamer€f, East st€m is 3' Dbh' and West $rm is 4" Dbh
condition- poor- ennrut gowth is subsmdrd. Bark has moderde infcction
ofby a virul€d armored scale insect cailed wiilow scale'
A\
AS-I
-si-A\
MtrlSdlc
ffi IF['
z'o e00tr926-0/6 {11ncg 1re61 ete:ll 80 9z qel
T;\
Worfu, rnX.
Lodgepole pirre (double-stemmed)
Location: West of u'est property line, according to l2-21-O7 MLS Site Plan
Dimetsr: Both stems are 5"Dbh
Condition: East stem is in average condition. West st€m exhibits extreme loss
of tnmk bark from pucupine Hing many years ago. A moderate infestation
ofneedle scale insects is prese,nt
Aspen (single'sbmmed)
Location: Adjaccnt to property linq west of garage stairqay-
Diamel€n 3" Dbh
Condition: Fair/poor. Bark is also infested withwillow scale'
Blue spruces (two eeParate trees)
Locaf,ion: Both spnrces ale located immediately west of driveway.
Dianeters: North tree is 8" Dbh. South trree is 7' Dbh-
Condition: Boft Us are in frir condition. Sparse density of louaer brmches is
and indietor of sipificant post-plating stress south tree has sipificant
phloem restriction scae from previousty encircling/embedded wire at 7-ft
heighl Hecvy widence of past needle scale infesEtion is present bIil rEaert
annual growth is ftee of new infestation
Trce preservation vens us tefnova ll replacement
Multist.r'rmed cottonwood: Although roots radiate outward (prinarily within the
top 16" of soil) a distance of 20 to 30 feet fron the tnmk, the cdtical mot moe is
wi-thin the firsi 5 feet ormru{ frm theroot colay'- For constnrgtion puqposes' a
Linit ofDistubance (LOD)z bat is 5 f€et fiom the mot mllar oflhis tres will
have minimd imFact to loog-tam tree healft Any soil dishnbmce rhar is closer
than 5 ftet wilf bane advers long-term impacts rTon this chmp of cottonwood
stems. For exmple, I was asked to rcspondto tbe imprct that a 2-ft (fi,om collar)
LOD wouldbaverpon6e sunivabitityof ftct€e- Ar.swen This sc€,laf,io would
cause insipient decay of the rmt croum, significant decline ofthe closest stem'
md possiblc oompromised stability. Agpin' I r€cornend a 5-ft (fiom collar)
LOD. tf constrrction plars necessitale a closer LOD, then I recommerd removal
Two blue spn*sr: Althoqhbo6 oftbese spruc€s ra capable of bcing
tansplfited rrrift a 9(I'tree spade, I do not recomend rebcaing these tees' My
primtry reasotr ftr rhis recommendaticn is that the foliage density in the lowcr
crorrn is too qlrse to govideprivacy scre€oing and aestbrric apPeal-
I Root collr lroot tlarc q ruot crorryn) - A poid at ftc he wbere a main butfess root and thc tnn'k merge.
2 Limir<f-Distrrtanoc (IOD) - A bdftr d* reprcscd the clocrst point tonarrds a tnrnk at lntir.h su&ce soil will sustain didurbance frrom an
excarrdftn cu! ovcr-acavatio, soil tryrring gridfug; trcnching ddition of fill, c machinery traffc
tv e00tr926-016 {;lncg 1re61 Bte:ll 80 9z qsj
Lra",X
Double-stemmed lodgepole pine: The l2-7I-07 MLS Site PIan shows this pine
locarcd outside the west prop€rty lin€. However, I am responding to your request
to comlaneot upon this tee. In oder to minimize impcts to this tee, I recommend
a LOD thd is 2 feet fiom the root collar ofthe east stem-
The two aspens in adjaoent to the west property line arc in poor condition
Replacement is fivored over tansplanting
Final recommendations :
1. A fence should be erccted stthe LOD prior the start of any soil
dishll'barce on fhe proiect Storage ofspill dirt, orother materials within
the I.'oD shsuld be snictly prohibited'
2. Insect infestdion is pevale,nt on this poperty. I recommend a Sp '0t
insect inspection on alllees within fu property and proceeding wirh a
spray program in ltilay/June.
If you have any firtber qucstions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
lSubmittedby anoitl
illa* Stclle, ASCA Registercd Cornrlting Arborist
t'd E00h9z6-016 I11ncg 1le6 ete:tt 80 9z qel
Michaell. Sanner, Architect, P.C.
P.O.Bo( 1498
Edqads,Colctado 81632
February 25, 2008
Mr. Bill Gibson
Town of Vail
Dept. of Communi$ DeveloPment
Vail, Colorado 81657
RE: Marsico Residence (DR8080026)
362 Mill Creek Circle/ Lot 9, Block 1, W Filing No l
Dear Bill,
This letter is in response to your letter of Feb l B' 2008'
1. We have redlined a set of floor plans showing the GRFA calculations verifying that the garage
can be converted into GRFA. ( FYI this conversion OCcuned before the current owners or my
involvement in this Project, )
2. Site Plan and LandscaPe Plans:
We are submitting a Site Plan at 1'' = 10' as well as 1"= 5''
There is a plan siowing snow storage areas which includes some area under an exisiing tree
which are Arborist sayjwill not be d-etrimental to it. The driveway will be heated as it is now'
The required 10% of ihe driveway is obtained with two areas that combined make 130 sf with
93.6 sf required.
There is a separate Tree Planting Plan that shows the trees that will be removed due to the
driveway expansion and 1 tree tnlat migrrt be kept (the large cottonwood out front). lt shows
wnere new replacement trees would be placed in the easi yard
The heated Oriu"*"Vlf"utld between the Concrete Pan and the property line will either not be
heated or will oe on L separate zone. This constitutes about a 2 ft wide sliver of driveway. The
concretepanisnotheated.ThisisnotedonthesiteP|anwithF|agNoteno.1.
On the same Site plan that shows the snow storage also shows the 4 required parking spaces
and the sight triangle requirement of Title 14. There are spruce trees on the adjacent lot to the
west that
-pose the biggest problem to sight lines. The view to the east is improved with the
removal ot tfre exisiiii driveway wall arid is not hindered by the Large Coftonwood as ifs
canopy is high and above the driver level of sight
ftag Nbte a
-anC 6 have been amended per your request'
I have hope these changes are adequate to fulfill your requirements'
.(-:
1''t
-i:.r
Project Architect
5 t+
TON'NM
Design Review B
I
oar
/o"z ll /lz7*€n,7 t
/of 7, blb /
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel :, 97O.479.2139 fax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail,co.us
Project Name: Marsico tree removals DRB Number: DR8050256
Project Description:
Removal of fourteen + (all tagged aspens, one cottonwood, two mugo, one alder) on the site to aid proper growth of more substantial spruces and coniferous trees ilong property line, No
additional planting will be required.
Pafticipants:
OWNER MARSICO, THOMAS F. & CYDNEY 06/1312005
1200 17TH ST 1300
DENVER
co 80202
APPucANlr A cur ABovE FoRESTRY o6lt3lzoos phone: 970-453-9154
PO BOX 7133
BRECKENRIDGE
co 80424
License: 574-S
coNTMcroR A cur ABovE FORESTRY 06113/2005 phone: 970-453-9154
PO BOX 7133
BRECKENRIDGE
co 80424
License: 574-5
ProJect Address: 382 MILL CREEK cR VAIL Location: 362 MILL CREEK cR
Legal Description: Lot: 9 Block: 1 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1
Parcel Number: 2101-082-4900-6
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Hanlon Action: APPROVED
Second By: Dunning
Vote: 4-0-0 DateofApproval: 07/0612005
Conditions:
Cond: I
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
)' .l
'l')
't('t At(
Lot:N
eq inor Exterior Alteratns
General Information:
lll"t:l-t*: requiring.design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. please reler to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that.is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by .the .community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town council-and/or the planning and Envrronmental commission.Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issuea ""J .,i"rt*.tion commences within one year of the approval.
Description of the
Physical Address:
Parcel No.: L
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
,*ffi Application for Design Review i
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
teli 970.479.2!28 faxi 970.479.2452
web: www.vailgov.com
fvv"uqo (i\
of thd Propo-sai:'Y arccr.: /
Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-g640 for parcel no.)
3oo
v 1P
s,o ,n
o
N
n
Mailing Address:
Phone;
Owner(s) Signature(s):
9:=.lr I
Name of Applicant: i
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
Type of Review and Fee:
fl Signs
! Conceptual Review
E New Construction ! Addition
n Minor Alteration
(multi-family/commercial)
Q Minor Alteration ' (single-family/duptex)
! Changes to Approved plans
n Separation Request
$50 Plus 91.00 per square foot of total siqn area.
No Fee
$650 Construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.$300 An addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).$250 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,re-roofing, painting. window .additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc.
$20 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,re+oofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc.
$20 Revisions to plans already approved by planning Staff or the Design Review Board.
No Fee
Fs"?ff""r'3 o"'''
check No.: LtO l Ctf m Dare: -7'G -O.f
.l
****{r:}*:}:t***************+**t **+t *t ***************+**********:t,i***{t**********t'1'**********:F+**
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
* **{. **:i**'}* *:}**** tt *,}****** *f *:N. *{. * ***** * *.**{.{.**:}**** * * * * * * *+++* *******+***************!t*{.***i.
statement Number: R050000815 Amount: $20.00 06/L3/200509:52 AM
Palzmene Method: Check Init: JS
Notation: 6 8 01/A CIII
ABOVE FORESTRY
Permit No: DR8050256 Type: DRB-Minor Alt,SFR/DUP
Parcel No: 2101-082-4900-6
Si.te Address: 382 MITL CREEK CR VAIL
L,ocation : 3 52 MIL,L CREEK cR
This Pa].ment:$20.00
*,$**** ****tf *+ **t;**,* + 'ft 's + r + * ** **,**:i ***tt*rS*****.t******* ******* * + * * * * + * * * * *'****'********t*t* ****+
ACCOI]NT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Deacription
DR 001000037.12200 DESIGN REVIEI{ FEES 20.00
Total Fees:
Tota1 AI,L Pmts :
Balance !
$20.00
$20.00
$0.00
Currents Pmts
rl
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING
Botanical Name Common Name Ouantitv Size
l'-4"EXISTING TREES | -- , A
_:__ __ .-__ Vrf lu.q'<1rc"rlcilr___tr:#,^_ lO
TO BE REMOVED i\ t, -- ., r ^ ( l lrqz"l,,.x lr^"ib\ia C-t+-, t"IA I
#tr-'*
EN
2.--4"
3"
Minimum Requirements for Landscaping:Deciduous Trees - 2" Calioer
Coniferous Trees - 6'in heioht
Shrubs - 5 Gal.
Tvpe Square Footaqe
GROUND COVER
soD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL
Please specify other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.)
PageT of I3lI2/02104
<- >t$(<-ls
IN \e: \\J i
[ \.- . /
-?P..H,?Eyffi,\Le' : r,ppnciilnl\
o7' o6'oo \tr
br'
C.
oe \J
€F;-\-an/F fKrc
,{
Date: 5ll3l05
To: Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
Re: Scott Sones/362 Mill Creek Cir.
A Cut Above Forestry has been contacted by Scott Sones to address crowding issues at 362 Mill
Creek Cir. The original landscape architect design \r'as to sneate a perimeter of rreee to re&lc€ wind md
give privady. The trees are now reaching maturity and are beginning to make aggressive contact causing
malformation of the more valuable trees on site. After meeting with a representative of Sonesmac we made
the obvious decision to select the more valuable tr€es and to remove the imposing tree of less€r mhre and
more structurally prone morphology. There are (l I ) total trees along Mill Creek Cir. that are flagged for
removal; (10) aspen (l) cottonwood. ofthe (10) aspen, (4) have included bark and though green are
struchrally prone to frilure. When frilure occurs the neighboring landscape as well as the residence may
be impacted/damaged.
If action is not taken soon the proximity of neighboring limbs upon the Colorado blue spruce
could cause breakage in a wind event.
h addition to th€ perihet€r tre€s tlrcre are (3) mugo pines,that have been girdled from browsing
porcupine. Though they are presently green due to their stores they will not survive the damage. As well
tbere is a grouping of shnrb trees nean the hot tubon the NW comer of the property that have also been
girdled by woodpecker bore holes and are affected so that they too are compromised. Near the rear entry
there is a grouping of aspen of which only one is surviving and with present form will safely grow out and
not into the overhanging structure. My belief is that the overcrowding is the main issue conceming overall
health, therefme replmrting b not recomrendcd
Sincerely,
Michael J. Scott
Certified Arborist, RM-2452A
INC.
MARK BEDELL
Shelf Mello
Town of Vail
Department of Gommunity Development
Vail. Colorado 81657
RE: Forbes Residence, Mill Creek Circle
Dear Ms. Mello:
on the original landscape plan for the Forbes residence I indicaled that three spruce trees would
be transplanted to the sorin"".t corner adiacent ro itre street. Lasl week a test pit was dug to
determine what kind or Jj, *eiepresent'on. rhe site and the dig revealed a rnix of cobbles'
boutders and sand. This soit rype would- make it
-impossiOte.tol?n"pll1l tn"se trees w*h a tree
spade, and hand or ,r"nin" oiiging to form " rootnli would not be worth the likely risk that the
rootSystemwou|dfai|.wewoutothereforep,opooremovingthethreetreesinquestionandat
the time of finish landscaping, lhree colorado sprr.r io: - t9' 'l heigtrt would be planted for
the proposed locations th; ;;; indicated on the ptan as transplanled spruce' (see landscape
plan.)
Please give me a call if you have any questions'
.,1
I
trj
d
't
fus/l/
Mark Bedell, President
Landforms, lnc.
MB/mck
cc: Walter Forbes
David FloYd
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
I
SITE CONSTRUCTION
Post Office Box l38l
Aspen, Colorado 81612
n3t9m-3939
I
Owner, Address and Phone:
Archrtect, Address and Phone:
l6r
ORr :Lot I ' -'
Legal DescriPtlon
Com ments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion bY:
Seconded bY:nTcaPPROVAL
APPROVAL
SummarY:
Town Plan ner
I'
Date:
Staf{ APProval
.,lf a
..lJ
L ;i+.r,;
,
r
a ,1t
, rr!.
l. -l'o
//
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
February 22,19gg
FttE C0Py
SUBJECT: A request for site coverage variance from Section l2-6D-9 and front
setback variance from Section 12-6D-6 for a residential addition located at
362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot I, Block 1 , Vail Village 1st.
Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey Pralt Architects.Planner: Allison Ochs
t.@
The applicant, Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey Pratt Architects, is requesting a site
coverage variance and front setback variance to allow for a residential addition. The variances are
requested to allow the applicant lo construct a small addition to the existing kitchen at their residence
located al 362 Mill Creek Circle. The proposed new kitchen addition would be located on the east
side of the property. The addition would encroach up to 2 feet into the setback and is proposed to
be 48 square teet in size
A written description from the applicant, and a copy of the plans have been attached for reference.
Because the applicant is proposing an increase of .35% over allowable site coverage (20%), aN a
reduction of 2 ft. in the front setback (20 ft), a site coverage variance of .35% and a front-setback
variance of 2 ft. must be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission.
II. ZONING STATISTICS
Lot Size: *' .32'14 acres or 14,000 sq. ft.Zoning: Primary/Secondary Residential
Allowed P/S Existino Proposed GRFA: 4600 sq. ft. 4504 sq. ft. 4552 sq. ft.
Setbacks:Front: 20' 21' 18'Sides: 15' N/C N/C
Site Coverage: 20% 20% 20.35%
2800 sq. ft. 2800 sq. ft. 2850 sq. ft.
III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Reqardino the Site Coveraoe and Setback Variances:
1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potenlial
uses and structures in the vicinity.A{\}.)
\ '--d{,r /
nundtuilV