The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 7 LOT 18A LEGAL.pdfobo ..9 'tH ^= :1 v .!l/) F1 9 :*d3 o|^- e<tr('J -.:-c ii = .=0.:E v!=6Hi^9!s >=r !"=* ;.= CX r, FYa '-r 6: .9oh i'r = t t4;!, zE3 >'F z i5 (n ! U) I T, J a _l .ol ;l 'l ,i (/') z b 7 ch |1 U at) F *l fl cqt -l .-.(,) !tt (E I U f'.o,o. F 'r- U N rr) @ U rg ro c{ co o = z F z F rt li tr E z (!5 >.9 ;(! >q] l-r 6'i v=\rt.=x=;i=;E (E!.] rEg x-}' Etin> fr'ht (! x= .: s{ -. -F. ni6l Xra .ei9 ;luY 73? lrF!YttT 'iaE OJ!bD E Y: - !4 r-n Ye)a lE5 ('lt6o 0,, -'!! G| r.i ,Y-ar t =. \) U .>- g .eF* -uo F U z 4 A D U U o k o H H ,{ U H h H E{fr H U -{l al 'h d '//' ^a ,1 s .) \ \LO s\o O r'-{<oo S"X +:\ .P€Lri S SS rX" p'E q) l- q) r) -) ty, I r +) o (t) s) p IJ s) ru .ll q!' CA OO si +l ri 3 ^ 1.0r€7fi06 Inspectio.T, Requeqt RePorting page zt A,/P/D Information Activitv: uonsl lvoe: OWrier: Architect: Apolicant: Cohtractor: Description: Cominent: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Requested Inspection(sl Item: 540 BLDG-Final C/O Requestor: SUNDER INC Comments: will call 390-1885. made Assioned To: GDENCKLA " Action: Monday, October 30, 2006 325 FOREST RD VAIL 325 FOREST ROAD Sub T.ype: USE: Phone: Phone: NDUP Status:V-B Insp Area: 701-852-5231 9704764433 Requested ISSUED 70\926-2777 70\926-2777 CW signed by engineer prior to review. - CGUNION ut EU FUTURE TO CHRIS GUNION, MATT GENNETT AND PUBLIC WORKS. NO D LIGHTING PANELS HAVE BEEN ROUGHED IN THE GAMGE TO TELL. - SHAHN ING ROUGH FMMING SUBMITTED AND PLACED IN FILE. - SHEET S2.A SUBMITTED AND PLACE IN OFFICE SET - JSUTHER corrections that GD requested Time Exp: Requested Time: 08:00 AM ' Phone: (970\ 926-2777 -or- cell - 390-1885 Entered Bv: DGOLDEN K Inspection Historv Item: 502 P Item: 503 P e Item: 10 BL "* Aooroved ** GCD ' ' Action: CR CORRECTION REQUIRED FOOTINGS DO NOT MEET PLAN #8 AT 6'OC REQD TO BE LONGITUDINAL CHECK BAR SIZE AND SPACING BOTH TOP AND BOTTOM MATS. 06/02/0s Comment: 08/02/05 Comment: 05/02/06 Comment: 05/04/06 Comment: 05/16/06 Comment: 05t24t06 Comment: REPT131 Run Idr 59L7 1.0"ta#06 tnspec{lo,rl,FeduFs,! &Porting eage ss Requested Inspect Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 Inspection Area: cq Site Address: 325 FOREST RD VAIL 325 FOREST ROAD A/P/D lnformation Activitv: M05-0168 Const Tvo6: Oufrier: GTNT lN\i AoDlicant: ALPINE v Cohtractor: ALPINE V Descriotion: H EAT ANI Cominent: ROUTED Comment: NOTIFIEC Requested Insoection(s) Insoection Historv Item: 200 M Sub Type USE Status: ISSUED Insp Area: cg Phone:701-852-5231 Phone: 970-926-2412 Phone: 970-926-2412 SIDES MASTER LICENSE EXPIRED. HE IS TO BE SENDING THIS ftoN DE TESTED EXTERIOR FOR lOOPSI. SLABS. 10/19/05 Insoector: omment: PARTIAL I INFORME 02115106 Insoector:uzlrc/ub Insoector: 5F|AHN Comment: EAST SIDE INSPECT REST OF 06l21lOG InsDector: JRM B-MECH Time Exp: Requested Time: 01:00 PM ' Phone: 970-926-2412 Entered Bv: DGOLDEN K Insoector: SHAHN Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL EAST SIDE: RANGE HOOD DUCT CORRECTION MADE.Item: 310 ME^C!-!e^aJing _ liApproved ON 0O121106 InsDector: JRM Action: PA PARTIAL APPROVAL Comment: APPROVED SNOW MELT FRONT ENTRY STAIRS ONLY BOTH SIDES 100 # AIR TES] 10/09/06 InsDector: JRM Action: AP APPROVED Comment: DRIVEWAY SNOWMELT BOTI SIDES 100 # AIR TEST Item: 315 PLMB-Gas Pioinq Item: 320 MECH-Exhaubt lloods Item: 330 MECH-Supplv Air Item: 340 MECH-MiSc.iiem: 5so MEeH-rindi | - . AL SIDES 1OO # AIR TEST REPT131 Run Id: 5845 Requestgd Inspec{ Date: W€dnesday, October 25, 2006 Inspodtion Area: CG Site Address: 325 FOREST RD VAIL 325 FOREST ROAD"EAST SIDE Requested Tlme: 0l:30 Pll - Phone: 3O}TT7-77OO Entered By: DGOLDEN K Status: ISSUED InspArea: CG Roouested lnsoection(sl r * Aporoved - Insoector: SHAHN Action: AP APPROVED APPROVED (2) DIRECT VENT AND (1) TYPE A REPTl31 Run Id: 5845 1t3tfl0m lnseec$on F?{luF:t neporting eage sz Requea : lednesday, Oc'tober 25,2006 ' :CG : 325 FOREST RD VAIL 325 FOREST ROATITA'EST SIDE A/P/D lnformatlon Requeeted Inspectlon(s) Inspectlon Hl6tolY Item: 200 MECH-Rouqh lbm: 310 Item: 315 Item: 320 Item: 330 Item: 340 Item: 390 B-MECH SubTgne: NDUP Status: ISSUED Insp Area: CG -Lc Filsffi: 381;??7:??83 Phone: 30&777-7700 TION OF FIREPLACES FOR GTNT DUPLEX Reouested Tlme: 02:00 PM ' Phone: 303-777-7700 Entered By: DGOLDEN K otftSltudntn"o"aor, siAfi * Approved * {AHN Action:lnsoector: SHAHN Actnn: TNSPECT (2) DTRECT AND (1) TYPE A APAPPROVED Run Id: 5845 REPT131 1%b21fr006 In"p""tl:,'l,F?$uF",*t-*Fo'ting e"gu g+ Requested Inspect Oate: Wednesday, October 25,2006 InspeCtion Area: CG Site Address: 325 FOREST RD VAIL 325 FOREST ROAD A/P/D Information Requested lnsoection(s) Item: 390 MEGH-Final Reouestor: ALLEN'S HEATING. A/C & SHEETME Time MAKE UP MAKE UP Inspection Historv Item: 200 MECH-Rouoh 01t31t06 Comment: 02t07to6 Comment: oz'tot06 Comment: o2t23r06 Comment: Req uested Time: 02:30 PM Phone: 303421-4020 Entered Bv: DGOLDEN K CLOSET PER IMC. CLOSET PER IMC. CR CORRECTION REQUIRED APPROVED. ) Action: Pl PARTIAL INSPECTION INSTALLED IN DRYER DUCTS. DUCTS NOTED ARE SUPPORTED. KITCHEN COMPLETE.Item:310 Item: 315 Item: 320 Item: 330 Item: 340 Item: 390 Comment:EAST UNIT: WEST UNIT: I AssionedTo: JMONDRAGON - Action: Comment: EASTIII\IITTIE F REPT131 Run Id: 5845 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road tet : gt o<tX-a)lrt;" ot ltt;" 7 s-z4sz projectName: GrNrDUpLEXrruofrrtSioffiiileov'com ApplicaUon Type: DupSubpl ADM t{umber ADM0G0017 project Description: FINAL APPROVAL FOR A DU'LEX "rorurrro,i"rcel: 2101-071-1302-2 Participants: OWNER GTNTINVESTMENTSLLC ROGER TOLLEFSON PO BOX 698 MINOT ND 58702 APPUCANT GTNT INVESTMENTS LLC . ROGERTOLLEFSON PO BOX 698 MINOT ND 58702 IU tl?006 Phone: 701-852-5231 tL/ t7 12006 Phone: 701-852-5231 ProjectAddress: 325 FORESTRD VAIL Location: 325 FORESTROAD tegal Descrip'on: toh 18 Block 7 Subdivision: VAIL WLLAGE FIUNG 1 Commentsi SeeConditions Motion By: Second By: Vote: CondiUons: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Approvalt LL/Z2I2OO6 Meeting Date: Cond:8 fl$ryli-tl. changes to these prans may be made without the written @nsent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review .orritt""iij. - Planner:Waren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $10O.OO Sent By: T0LLEFS0NS RETAIL CROUP INC; o 70183701 77;oct-18-06 4: 1 7PM; o Page 1/1 ADDlic tiqr forAdnfiffive Srnrftbiqr Pltt RGUlqil Hb.: Tto ttl+tl|'f>Y (ffiE9bco.Et9'sifiDfFforfrdm') f*gr ?[rrre4r / cscr.'r'JPnl1 frrr(r)dr'rr(q: 6TN T lN rl Ert'v.Et'trs, LG t'FE-l O'.'(ttsnt(! fr-JltFG rNaf 5670]:L #r lot'Xat-tLat 4 5t Gd tu t toLLc (son@^rt o aca r*sfr4lLPJ3-T I TR-rcq' c( z6 psdFodf{rlottAnnfi||-5rllt!- -.tftri.rhb*L.{l-rrvtr& F!'lol' lacct o 7 o o o o -\, LLC rt 4tu lL'tl t<.o-l tr) +tll++***fl+t**+++++++{'**+***+++l+++*++++aa*++{t+t++***a*t+++++{rlr++++++++***++******++l*****+ TOWN OF VAII. COLORADO Stat€ment ******** + 'l * ****tl'**t!t**a********++****+ * * t + t * * **+****+{.+* *****+ '}++*****+**l'+***ttt+*rtt'tt+** Seatsement Number: R050002002 Amount: $100.00 rL/n/200609:35 A!1 Palment Method: Cheek Init: its Notation 3 1117,/GTI[T ITiI\IESTMEIiTTS LIJC Permit No: ADMo60017 Type: AdninisErative Parcel No: 21,0L-O71-13O2-2 Site Addregs: 325 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 325 FOREST ROAD Total FeeE: $100.00 This Payment: $100.00 Total ALL Etntg: $100.00 Balance: $0. OO ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Aecouut code DeEcription PV 00100003112500 AdmlniBtrative Fee Current Pnts 100.00 PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS FOR LOT lEA AND LOT lEB, A RESUBI}TVISON OF LOT 18, BLOCK 7, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING, TOWN OF VAIL COUNTY OF EAGLE. COLORADO RECITALS A. GTNT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a North Dakota limited liability company ("Declarant") is the owner in fee simple of the real property situated in the County of Eagle, Sate of Colorado, described as Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, According To The Recorded Plat Thereofi, county ofEagle, State ofColorado. B. Lot l8 shall be subdivided into Lot 18A and Lot 18B. Declarant shall construct certain improvements on each subdivided Lot, intended for use and occupancy as residential dwelling units. The address of the dwelling unit constructed on Lot l8A shall be designated 315 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 and the address of the dwelling unit constructed on Lot IEB shall be designated as 325 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado 81657. DECLARATION Declarant, hereby publishes and declares that the following terms, covenants, conditions, easements, restrictions, uses, reservations, limitations, and obligations shall be deemed to run with the land described herein, shall be a burden and a benefit to Declarant, his personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns and any person acquiring or owning an interest in the real property which is described herein and improvements built thereon, his grantees, personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. l. DEFINITIONS. Unless the context shall expressly provide otherwise, the following terms shall have the following meanings: A. "The Property" or "Propedies" means all of the real estate legally described as Lot 18A and Lot l8B, also know as 315 Forest Road, and 325 Forest Road, a resubdivision oflot 18, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, Town of Vail, County of Eagle, Colorado. B. "Parcel," or "Lot" means Lot l8A or l8B as shown on the "Map", as defined below, together with all appurtenances, and improvements, including the "Units", as defined below, as shown on the "Map" C. "Duplex" or "Building" means the two contiguous dwelling units constructed upon the Parcel or Parcels. D. "IJnit" means any one of the two dwellings comprising the "Duplex." E. "Owner" means a person, persons, firn" corporation, limited liability company, partnership or association, or other legal entity, or any combination thereof,, owning an interest in the Parcels. F. "Map" means the engineering survey of the Properties by Eagle Valley Surveying, Inc., styled Final Plat, Vail Village First Filing A Resubdivision of Lot 18, Block 7, Town of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado depicting and locating with specificity thereon the Lotq Units and other improvements, the easements and setbacks, such land and improvements being hereby submitted to this Declaration. Such Map shall be recorded in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder prior to the recordation ofthis Declaration. G. "Assessment" means any periodic or one-time charge to cover the cost of any expense or charge that becomes due and owing by virtue ofthis Declaration. 2. DESCRIPTION AIID RESERVATION. Every Contract of Sale, Deed, Lease, Mortgage, Trust Deed Will or other instrument shall legally describe a Unit or real property interest as follows: Lots l8A or l8B (as the case may be), according to the Final Plat Vail Village First Filing, A Resubdivision of Lot 18, Block 7, Town of Vail, County of Eagle, Colorado recorded on as Reception No.and according to the Party Wall Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Lot l8A and Lot 18, a Resubdivision of Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing County of Eagle, State ofColorado recorded on as Reception No. . of the records of the County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County. Every such description shall be good and suflicient for all purposes to sell, convey, transfer, encumber or otherwise affect the Parcels and all appurtenant rights, benefits, and burdens thereto as created by the provisions ofthis Declaration, and each such description shall be so construed. This provision shall apply to the properties as said term (the Properties) is defined in this Declaration. 3. PROPERTY DIVISION. A. Declarant hereby establishes this plan for the subdivision of the Properties into two (2) Parcels for ownership in fee simple by the individual and separate Owners of Lot 18A and Lot l8B as more particularly described on the Map thereof. B. Lot l8A and Lot 18B shall be subject to the easements noted on the map and those set forth herein. C. In the event Lot l8A and Lot l8B are owned bv the same entities. the doctrine of merger shall not apply. D. The parties, if more than one, having the ownership of a Parcel, shall agree among themselves how to share the rights and obligations of such Ownership; provided, however, that if a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other legal entity shall become an Owner or the parties, if more than one, have the concurrent Ownership of a Parcel, then such entity or concurrent Owners shall from time to time designate one individual who shall represent such entity or concurrent Owners in all matters concerning all rights and obligations pursuant to this Declaration. E. Any such entity or @ncurrent Owners shall give written notice to the other Owner designating the individual to act on its or their behalf and such notice shall be effective until revoked in writing by such entity or Owners. Any act or omission by such designated individual shall be binding on the entity or Owners having designated him in favor of the other Owner or any other person who may rely thereon. F. Each Parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of real property and shall be separately addressed and taxed. 4. f,NCROACHMENTS. If any portion of Lot l8A or Lot l8B now encroaches upon the other Parcel as a result ofthe construction ofany building, or ifany such encroachment shall occur hereafter as a result of settling or shifting of any building, a valid easement for the encroachment and for the maintenance of the same so long as the building stands, shall exist. In the event any building shall be partially or totally destroyed as a result offire or other casualty or as a result of condemnation or eminent domain proceedings and then rebuilt, encroachments of parts ofthe building on the other Parcel, due to such rebuilding, shall be permitted, so long as such encroachments are ofno greater extent than those previously existing and valid easements for such encroachments and the maintenance thereof shall exist so long as the building shall stand. 5. PARTYWALL. A. The common wall placed equally divided on the common boundary separating Parcel I and Parcel 2, the footings underlying and the portion of roof over such wall are collectively refened to herein as the "Parfy Wall". B. To the €xtent not inconsistent with this Declaratiorl the general rules of law regarding party walls and liability for damage due to negligence, willful acts or omissions shall apply to the Party Wall. C. The Owners of either Parcel shall have a perpetual easement in and to that part of the other Parcel on which the Party Wall is located, for party wall purposes, including mutua] support, maintenance, repair and inspection. In the event of damage to or the destruction of the Party Wall from any cause, then the Owners shall at joint expense in shares set forth in paragraph 8 below, repair or rebuild said Party Wall, and each Owner shall have the right to the full use of said Party Wall so repaired and rebuilt. Notwithstanding anyhing contained above to the contrary, if the negligence, willful act or omission of any Owner, his family, agent or invitee, shall cause damage to or destruction of the Party Wall, such Owner shall bear the entire cost of repair or reconstruction (to the extent that such damage is not covered by insurance), and an Owner who by his negligent or willful act causes the Party Wall to be exposed to the elements shall bear the full cost of fumishing the necessary protection against such elements. 6. LANDSCAPING. SERVICE T'ACILITIES. AND PARIilNG A. Each Owner shall from time to time, at his sole cost and expense, irrigate, maintairq preserve and replace, as needed, the tre€s, shrubs and grass located within the boundaries of his Parcel commensurate with the standards set by the original developer's landscaping of the Parcels and each Owner shall from time to time, at his sole cost and expense, undertake such landscaping and general outdoor improvements on his Parcel as the Owners may jointly deem necessary and proper for the harmonious improvement of the Parcels in a common theme. The Owner ofone Parcel shall not unreasonably damage the value ofthe other Parcel by shoddy upkeep of the Parcel, but both Owners shall make all reasonable efforts to preserve a harmonious co[rmon appearance of the Parcels. B. Common utility or service connections or lines, common facilities, or other equipment and property located in or on either of the Parcels but used in common with the other Parcel, if any, shall be owned as tenants in common of equal undivided one-half interests by the Owners ofeach Parcel and, except for any expense or liability caused through the negligence or willful act of any Owner, his farnily, agent, or invitee, which shall be borne solely by such Owner, all expenses and liabilities concerned with such property shall be shared in the proportions set forth in paragraph 8 below. The Owner of the Parcel on which such'property is not located shall have a perpetual easement in and to that part of such other Parcel containing such property as is reasonably necessary for purposes of maintenance, repair, and inspection. 7, ALTERATION. MAINTENANCE AI\D REPAIRS. A. Each Owner shall, at his sole cost and expense, provide exterior maintenance and exterior repair upon his Unit and the other improvements located on his Parcel as well as the unimproved portions, of the Parcel upon which his Unit is located, including but not limited to, the exterior walls and the roof of the Unit. Such maintenance and repair shall be commensurate with the standards set by the original developer and each Owner shall undertake all maintenance and repair (including periodic painting and staining) necessary and proper for the harmonious appearance of the Parcels and Units in a common theme. The Owner of one Parcel shall not unreasonably damage the value ofthe other Parcel by improper maintenance and repair of his Unit and Parcel, but both Owners shall make all reasonable efforts to pres€rve a harmonious common appearance of the Units and Parcels. B. Each Owner shall be solely responsible for maintenance and repair of the inside of his Unit including fixh"res and improvements and all utility lines and equipment located therein and serving such Unit only. In performing such maintenance and repair, or in improving or altering his Unit, no Owner shall do any act or work which impairs the structural soundness of either Unit, or which interferes with any easement granted or reserved herein, C. Utility or service connections or lines, facilities or other utility equipment and property located in, on or upon either of the Parcels, which are used solely to zupply a service or utility shall be owned by the Owner ofthe Unit using such utility or service and all expenses and liabilities for repair and maintenance shall be bome solely by the Owner of such Unit, who shall have a perpetual easement in and to that part of such other Parcel or Unit containing such property as is reasonably necessary for purposes of maintenance, repair and inspection. D. No Owner shall make or suffer any structural or design change (including a color scheme change), eitler permanent or temporary and of any type or nature whatsoever to the exterior of his unit or construct any additional building structure of any type or nature whatsoever upon any part of his Parcel without first obtaining the prior written consent thereto from the other Owner. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In case ofdamage or destruction of any Unit or any part thereof by any cause whatsoever, the Owner of such Unit shall cause with due diligence the Unit to be repaired and restored, applying the proceeds of insurance, ifany, for that purpose. Such Unit shall be restored to a condition comparable to that prior to the damage and in a harmonious manner to promote the common theme of both Parcels. 8. ALLOCATION OF EXPENSES. Costs and expenses of all activities whose cost is anticipated to be shared by both Owners, except as eaused by negligence or willful act of an Owner, shall be allocated in the following proportions: Lot l8A Lot l8B - 40% 9. MECHANICS'LIENS: INDEMhIFICATION. A. Except for items incurred as a common expense as provided for herein, if any Owner shall cause any material to be furnished to his Parcel or Unit thereon or any labor to be performed therein or thereon, the other Owner shall not under any circumstances be liable for the payment of any expense incurred or for the value of the work done or material furnished; all such work shall be at the expense of the Owner causing it to be done, and such Owner shall be solely responsible to contractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons furnishing labor or materials to his Parcel or any improvements thereon or therein; nothing herein contained shall authorize either Owner or any person dealing through, with or under either Owner to charge the Unit of the other Owner with any mechanics' lien or other lien or encumbrance whatever; and, on the contrary (and notice is hereby given), the right and power to charge any lien or encumbrance of any kind against one Owner or against one Owner's Parcel for work done or materials fumished to the other Owner's Parcel is hereby expressly denied. B, Except as provided for below, if, because of any act or omission of any Owner, any mechanics' or other lien or order for the payment of money shall be filed against the other Owner's Parcel or any improvements therein or thereon or against any other Owner (whether or not such lien or order is valid or enforceable as such), the Owner whose act or omission forms the basis for such lien or order shall at his own cost and expense cause the same to be cancelled and discharged of record within thirty (30) days after the date of filing thereof, and further shall indemniS and save the other Owner harmless from and against any and all costs, expenses, .claims, losses or damages, including reasonable attorney's feeslesulting therefrom. IO. INSURAIICE. A. Each Owner shall keep his Unit and all fixtures therein insured against loss or damage by fire and extrended coverage perils (including vandalism and malicious mischief) for the maximum replacement value thereof. Any Owner may on 30 days'written notice, but not more frequently than onc€ every tluee years, obtain a written estimate of the replacement cost of the Units by a licensed contractor, and the cost of such estimate shall be split between the Owners on a 50/50 basis. Such contractor shall be a disinterested and independent third party who is unrelated in any manner to either Owner whether through joint business ventures or otherwise. B. Each Owner shall provide and keep in force, for the protection of himself, general public liability and property darnage insurance against claims for bodily injury or death or prop€rty damage occurring iq on or upon, his Parcel owned in fee simple and the improvements thereon, in a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 in respect of bodily injury or death to any number of persons arising out of one accident or disaster, or for damage to property, and if higher limits shall at any time be customary to protect against possible tort liability, zuch higher limits shall be carried. C. Each Owner shall deliver to the other Owner certificates evidencing all insurance required to be carried under this paragraph, each containing agreements by the insurers not to cancel or modify the policies without giving the other Owner written notice of at least 30 days. Each Owner shall have the right to inspect and copy all such insurance policies of the other Owner and require evidence of the payment of premiums thereon. D. Nothing provided in this paragaph shall prevent the Owners from jointly acquiring a single policy to cover any one or more ofthe hazards required in this paragraph to be separately insured against by each Owner. E. All insurance policies obtained by either Owner shall expressly waive all rights of subrogation as against all other Owners and their respective families and invitees. I I. DESTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON PARCEL. A. In the event of damage or destruction to a Unit by fire or other disaster, the insurance proceeds if sufficient to reconstruct the Unit shall be deposited into a bank account which requires, for withdrawals, the signatures of both the Owners, or disbursed directly by the insurance carrier. The Owners shall then promptly authorize the necessary repair and reconstruction work and the insurance proceeds will be applied by the Owners to defray the cost thereof "Repair" and "Reconstruction" of Units, as used in paragraphs ll.A and 11.8 herein, means restoring the improvements to substantially the same condition in which they existed prior to the damage, with each Unit having the same boundaries as before. B. If the insurance proceeds are insuffrcient to repair or reconstruct any damage to a Parcel or the improvements constructed thereon, such damage or destruction shall be promptly repaired and reconstruaed by the Owner using the insurance proceeds and the proceeds of an assessment against the Owne(s) of the damaged Parcel(s). Such assessment shall be equal to the amount by which the cost ofreconstruction or repair exceeds the sum ofthe insurance proceeds allocable to such Parcel. Such Assessment shall be due and payable forty-five (45) days after the determination of the difference between the cost of reconstruction and repair and insurance proceeds, and all such funds shall be deposited and disbursed pursuant to paragraph I l.A. C. If the Owners of Lot l8A and Lot l8B and the holders of first mortgages or beneficiaries of first deeds of trust on Lot l8A and Lot l8B unanimously agree not to repair or reconstruct damage or destruction to I-ot l8A or Lot l8B, the Property shall be sold and the proceeds shall be divided as agreed to at the time of the agreement not to rebuild by the Owners oflot l8A and Lot l8B, and the holders offirst mortgages and beneficiaries offirst deeds of trust on Lot l8A and Lot IEB (the "Each Owne/s Share of Proceeds"). Each Owner's Share of Proceeds shall be disbursed as follows: l. For payment oftaxes and special assessment liens in favor ofany assessing entity and customary expenses ofsale; 2. For payment of the balance of the lien of any first mortgage or deed of trust; 3. For payment of any sums due under this Declaration; 4. For payment ofjunior liens and encumbrances in the order ofand to the extent oftheir priority; and 5. The balance remaining, if any, shall be paid to the respective Owners. 12. RIGHT TO LIEN. A. If an Owner, at any time, shall neglect or refuse to perform or pay his share of any obligation required hereunder, the other Owner may, but shall not be obligated to, after 30 days' written notice, unless the circumstances require immediate action, make such payment or, on behalf of such other Owner, expend such sum as may be necessary to perform such obligation including, but not limited to, the payment of any insurance premiums required hereunder or the undertaking of any work required hereunder for repair, restoration or maintenance, and such other Owner shall have an easement in and to that part of such defaulting Owner's Parcel as is reasonably necessary for such repair, restoration or maintenance. B. All sums so paid or expended by an Owner, with interest thereon at the rate of 15 percent per year from the date of zuch payment or expenditure, shall be payable by the Owner so failing to perform (the "Defaulting Owner") upon demand of the other Owner. C. All sums so demanded but unpaid by the Defaulting Owner shall constitute a lien on the Parcel of the Defaulting Owner in favor of the other Owner prior to all other liens and encumbrances, except: (i) liens for taxes and special assessments; and, (ii) the lien of any first mortgage or first deed of trust of record encumbering such Parcel. The lien shall attach from the date when the unpaid sum shall become due and may be foreclosed in like manner as a mortgage on real property upon the recording of a notice or claim thereof executed by the Non-defaulting Owner setting forth the amount of the unpaid indebtedness, the name of the Defaulting Owner, and a description of the Unit. In any such foreclosure, the Defaulting Owner shall be required to pay the costs and expenses of such proceedings, including reasonable attomey's fees. Foreclosure or attempted foreclosure of the lien shall not be deemed to preclude the other Owner from suing the Defaulting Owner personally therefore or from thereafter again foreclosing or attempting to foreclose the lien for any subsequent assessments, charges, fees or other sums which are not fully paid when due. D. The lien provided for herein shall be subordinate to the lien of any first mortgage or deed oftrust, including all additional advances thereon. Sale or transfer ofeither Parcel at the result of court foreclosure of a mortgage, foreclosure through the public trustee, or any proceeding in lieu of foreclosure, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments thereof which become due prior to such sale or transfer, but shall not relieve any former Owner of personal liability therefor. The mortgagee of such Parcel who acquires title by way of foreclosure or the taking ofa deed in lieu thereof, shall not however, be liable for any past due assessment and shall only become entitled to become the Owner of such Parcel. No sale or transfer shall relieve such Parcel from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due or from the lien thereof. In the event of the sale or transfer of a Parcel with respect to which sums shall be unpaid by a Defaulting Owner, except transfers to a first mortgagee in connection with a foreclosure ofits lien or a deed in lieu thereo{ the purchaser or othertransferee ofan interest in such Parcel shall be jointly and severally liable with the seller or transferor thereoffor any such unpaid sums. E. Upon written request of any Owner, mortgagee, prospective mortgagee, purchaser or other prospective transferee of a Parcel, the Owner ofthe other Parcel shall issue a written statement setting forth the amount he is owed under this paragraplg if any, with respect to zuch Unit. Such statement is binding upon the executing Owner in favor of any person who may rely thereon in good faith. Unless a request for such statement shall be complied with within fifteen (15) days after receipt thereof all unpaid sums which became due prior to the date of making such request shall be subordinated to the lien or other interest of the person requesting zuch statement. 13. ADMINSTRATION AND MANAGEMENT. Both Lot Owners shall be equally responsible for the administration and management of the obligations created hereunder. 14. USE RESTRICTIONS. A. Each Unit shall be restricted to a residential dwelling as a permitted use, and conditional and accessory uses as defined by the Town of Vail, Colorado Zoning Code. B. No exterior satellite dish antenna greater than one meter (39.37 inches) or tank of any kind, either elevated or buried, or clothesline or incinerator of any kind whatsoever or outside storage of any personal property shall be permitted or maintained on either Parcel without the prior written approval of both Owners C. No animals shall be kept or maintained in, on or upon either Unit, except that each Owner may keep and maintain within his Unit domesticated animals; provided, however, that such domesticated animals are kept under control at all times, do not present a nuisance to the other Owner, and are kept controlled in strict compliance with all Town of Vail, Colorado Ordinances. D. Parking on either Parcel of boats, trailers, campers, motor homeq ATVs, or recreational vehicles is expressly prohibited, unless located within an Owner's garage. Each Owner may keep no more than three (3) automobiles permanently on his or her Parcel. E. No "time sharing", "interval ownership", "vacation club" or similar interest, whereby Ownership of a Unit is shared by Owners on a time basis, shall be established on either Parcel without the prior written approval of both Owners and which approval shall be reflected in a recorded document. 15. NOTICE. Each Owner shall register its mailing address with the other Owner and all notices or demands intended to be served upon Owners shall be sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed in the name of the Owner at such registered mailing address. In the alternative, notices may be delivered if in writing, personally to Owners. 16. DURATION OF DECLARATION. Each and every provision of this Declaration which is subject to the law sometimes referred to as the rule against perpetuities or the rule prohibiting unreasonable restraints on alienation shall continue and remain in full force and effect for the period of twenty (20) years following the death of the last survivor of the Queen of England or until this Declaration is terminated as hereinafter provided, whichever first occurs. All other provisions contained in this Declaration shall continue and remain in full force and effect until January l,2Q3l AD, and thereafter for successive periods often (10) years or this Declaration is terminated by recorded instrument, directing terminatiorg signed by all Owners and all lienors holding a mortgage or deed of trust of record on any portion of Parcels l8A and oflot 188. 17. AMENDMENT OR REVOCATION. This Declaration may be amended only upon unanimous written approval in recordable form of all Owners and may be revoked upon the unanimous written approval in recordable form of all the Owners and all lienors holding a first mortgage or first deed of trust of record on any portion of Lot 18A or Lot 18B. 18. EFFECT OF PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION. Each provision of this Declaration and Agreement, promise, covenant and undertaking to comply with each provision of this Declaration, and any necessary exception or reservation or grant of title, estate, right or interest to effectuate any provision of this Declaration: (i) shall be deemed incorporated in each deed or other instrument by which any right, title or interest in any portion of Lot l8A or Lot 18B is granted, devised or conveyed, whether or not set forth or referred to in such deed or other instrument; (ii) shall, by virtue of acceptance of any right, title or interest in any portion of Lot l8A or Lot l8B by an Owner, be deemed accepted, ratified, adopted and declared as a personal covenant of such Owner, running with the Property and, as a personal covenant, shall be binding on such Owner and his heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns; and shall be deemed a personal covenant to, with and for the benefit of each Owner of any portion of Declarant, for itself, its successors and assigns, and also an equitable servitude, running, in each case, as a burden with and upon the title to each and every portion of Lot l8A and Lot l8B. 19. ENFORCEMENTANDREMEDIES. A. Each provision of this Declaration shall be enforceable by any Owner by a proceeding for a prohibitive or mandatory injunction or by a suit or action to recover damages. If court proceedings are instituted in connection with the rights of enforcement and remedies provided in this Declaration, tlte prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and expenses in connection therewith, including reasonable attorney's fees. B. Each Owner hereby agrees that any and all actions in equity or at law which are instituted to enforce any provision hereunder shall be brought in and only in the District Court of Eagle County, State of Colorado and that this Party Wall Agreement shall be interpreted and govemed in accordance with Colorado law. C. Failure to enforce any provision of this Declaration sha[[ not operate as a waiver ofany such provision, the right to enforce such provision thereafter, or ofany other provision of this Declaration. 20 EXERCISE OF RIGHTS. Any exercise of any right granted hereunder by one Owner with respect to the other Owneds Unit, including but not limited to the use of any easement granted herein, shall be exercised in a manner which shall not unreasonably hinder, impede or impose upon such other Owner's use of his Unit. 21. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Declaration shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each Owner and the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each. 22. SEVf,RABILITY. Invalidity or unenforceability of any provisions of this Declaration in whole or in part shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Declaration. 23. CAPTIONS. The captions and headings in this instrument are for convenience only and shall not be considered in construing any provisions of this Declaration. 24. CONSTRUCTION. When necessary for proper construction, the masculine of any word used in this Declaration shall include the feminine or neuter gender, and the singular the plural, and vice versa. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Declarants have executed this Declaration this I day of ilo,te *hpl( .2006. l0 GTNT II.I\{ESTMENTS. LLC r) Subscribed apd sworn to before me this Q a"y of l)du<*b"k2006_______- by ILol.- Tilte {snv asManagerofG'lffi InvistmeiGlll.C ) )ss ) Witness mv hand and oflicial My commission expires on: 6- JOINDEROF LIENOR The undersigned, beneficiary under a Deed of Trust recorded at Reception No. 884957 on the prop€rty records in the offrce of the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the "Deed of Trust"), for itself and its successors and assigns, approves the foregoing PARTYWALL AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS FOR LOT I8A AND LOT I8B, A RESUBDIVISON OF LOT 18 BLOCK 7 VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILINGEAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO ('"arty Wall Agreement") to be imposed on the property encumbered by the Deed of Trust and agrees that no foreclosure or other enforcement of any remedy pursuant to the Deed of Trust shall impair, invalidate, supersede or otherwise affect the covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements established bv the Party Wall Apreement. ll Notarv Public )ss )COT'NTYOF 2006 by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires on: 12 Design Review Board ACTION FORM Departrnent of Community Dq/elopment 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 teli 970.479.2139 fax: 97O.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail,co.us Project Name: GTNT CHANGE DRB Number: DR8050202 Proiect Description: TREE REMOVAL AND MMGATION PLAN FOR NEW DUPLEX CONSTRUCTION Pafticipants: OWNER GTNTINVESTMENTSLLC 05/16/2005 Phone:701-852-5231 ROGER TOLLEFSON PO BOX 698 MINOT ND 58702 APPLICANT SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATo5 | 1612005 Phone: 97 047 6-4433 1OOO S. FRONTAGE RD W. SUITE 3OO VAIL co 816s7 License: C000001762 ARCHITECT SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATo5 l L6lZO0s Phone: 970-476-4433 1OT EAGLE ROAD, BUILDING 5 AVON co 81620 License: C000001762 Project Address: 325 FOREST RD VAIL l-ocation: 325 FOREST ROAD Legal Description: Lot; 18 Block:7 Subdivision: VAILVIL|AGE FILING 1 Parcel Number: 2101-071'L302-2 Commentsl see conditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion Byr Action: STAFFAPR Second By:Vote: DateofAPProvab 05/L7/2005 Conditions: Cond: 8 (pLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s)' Cond: 0 (pl-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities' Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval' Cond:202 Apprwal of this project shall lapse and becorne rloid one (1) year following the date of final apprwal, unless a building permit b lssr.nd and construction is commend and ls diligently pursued brvard completion. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: 120.00 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit applicatin,, Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Deslgn"Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planninq and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request: Location of the Proposa lz tot: /8 gocu: Physical Address: Parcel No.: Zoning: Name(s) of Owner(s): Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant:sezopaare /4AT/4a4 )f4//@5 Mailing Address::a L, 4a E-mail Address: Type of Review and Feel n Signs E Conceptual Review E New Construction tr Addition tr Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) tr Minor Alteration (single-family/duplex) X cn"ng., to Approved Plans tr Seoaration Reouest $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 Construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 An addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 Revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) For Office U Fee Paid: Q-t r-a 7 T0l/'4V ., drlinor Exterior Alter{ons I A'Fplication for Design Review Deparunent of Community Development 75 Sou$ Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 telt 970.479.2128 faxt 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted unul all required information is received by the Community Development Deparlment. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review apprcval tapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request: Locationof theproposatz tot, /8 ew*z'7 suoaivtsion:VHUV44Wftpfiy' fti Physical Address: Parcel No.: Zoning: Name(s) of Owner(s): Address: ,' Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: t/m5 Address::a L. eo Phone: E-mail Address: $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. . No Fee $650 Construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $3OO An addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 addiUons & interior conversions). $250 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painUng, window 'additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 Minor cfianges to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 Revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee Type of Review and Fee: tr Signs E Conceptual Rwiew tr New Constuction O Addition E Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) E Minor Alteration (single-family/duplex) \ Aranges to Approved Plans (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Separation Request llail: P.O- Box Main Office: Eagle-vail Denver Offrce: 1617 May 13, 2005 Mr. Matt Gennett Town of Vail Community Development 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: 325 FOREST ROAD Dar Matt: Per our meeting today, enclosed herewith is an application for the tree removal and mitigation plan for 325 Forest Road. I have also included a report from the arborist, Rick Herwehe, for your review and records. Please let me know if you need any further information. Best regards, SEGERBEG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS KAS/rt enc. rytp,i fax: 910 4't6 4604 303 623 2262 4?00 . vril, CO . l0l Eag € Road Bldg Wazee Srreet. Surte C2 Kurt A. Segerberg, A.l.A. President tl65t . e-marl info@smatchs.com 6 . Avon. CO 81620 ' pbone: 970 476 4.133 Denver. CO 80202 . phon€: 303 621 3355 A Cut Above Forestry, Inc. Specializing on Tree Scrvlce end Fott'otry Consufting May 12,2AO5 Segerberg Mayhew Architects 1O00 S.Frontage Road West, Suite 300 Vail, CO 81657 RE. Trees at 325 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado- Dear Kurt, Thank you for meeting me yesterday at 325 Foreet Road. Thie letter is a summary of the meeting I had with you snd JP Sunderland, the general contractor, about two trees on the site. John was concerned about two treee that will require ercavation inside of the dripline. Both trees are indigenous, large diameter Englemann spruce trees. Tree #1 , es referenced in the Tree preservation report prepared on Novembor 1, 2004, is located between Foreet Road and the old houee. According to the survey staking, foundation ercavation will be required to within 1O-feet of the north side of the tree'6 root coller. Although this iB closer than 1z-foot root protection zone recommended in the preeervation plan, Industry standerd will allow soil disturbance and root loss to within 10 *feet of this tree as long as it is only occure on one side of the tree. In the plan I noted the tree has a bole wound on the south side. During thie visit, I noticed a flattening of the root collar on the north side, This flattening can be an indicator of root damage so I decided to remove e core from the tree with an increment bore. I found thet tho tree has approximately g-inghes of sound wood around the outer circumference and stem rot in the interior (see figure 1). Although g- inches of sound wood is likely adequate to withstand most seasonal weather in the Vail area, thig tree will become an unacceptable hazard within the nerl few years. Although this tree is a vieual ass6t to the site in my professional opinion it should be removed during construction to reduce the potential risk to property or p€rsons. P.O. Bor 7133 Breckenrldge 970453-9154 rd l,lds? : fz Eegle Couniy 970426-9243 Adl-sluojfnoau ln3 u: l^lldj SEAd fT 'FPLI 9L6FtStrAL6i 'ON XUI Figure 1: Tree #2was a tree We had hoped to Eave but the house design could not be changed engugh to provide an edequate root Prgtection zon€ ercaJation for the foundation will encroach to within sidee of the root collar. This will damage approxima remove many of the large woody roots neceasary fo e removed to reduce the risk of failure due to root loss' the more fi: l;[li:,., the e and soil moisture should be monitored during construction to insure adequate waler is available 1o the tree during the construction Process. The silt fence ehould be re-erected and maintained to minimize eoil migration into the ioot .on. of the downhill trees. The recommendations in the preservation plan including tJrtitizrtion, mulch and fencing for the remaining trees should be implemented i.meOia"fy. An additional reiommendation is to chemically treat the 1rs66 ;6f661sd with scale insec'ts. Please contact me with any queetione at 970.45&9154' Certified Arborist #RM-z1 95 A Cut above Forestry zd wdgvtxa saaz gr '6Phl 9I.6VXS,VAL6| 'ON XUI AUTS]UOI=nOgU It-tf U : HOUI O Palrment Method: Check SEGERBERG o +******************+**+**++**+**++***********,t *:**+*r.***r.++**+******** ** + * * * * * * {r * * ***'}*t}:t ** * * TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement *+*** * *+***+*****:f ***'f ** * * * *** * *** ****{.* **:1.***{. '1.1.*{.+**:}:t * * **********+**************'}'1.***,N.*** Statement Number: RO5OOO0597 Amount: $20.00 05/L6/2005021.59 PM hi-t: JS NoEation: 5503/IruRT Permit Nor Parcel No: site Address : Location: This Pa]rmenL: ACCOTINT ITEM LIST: Account Code DR 00100003 172200 DRB050202 2LOt- 07 !- 7302 - 2 3 2 5 FOREST RD VAII-, 325 FOREST ROAD $20.00 Description Ig)e: DRB-Chg to Appr Plarrs TotaL Fees: Total AI,IJ PmIs : Balance : DESIGN REVIEW FEES 920 - 00 $20.00 s0.00 Current Pmts 20.00 Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 97O.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co. us Project Name: GTNT CHANGE Project Description: PLAN AND ELEVATION REVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCNON OF A NEW DUPLEX Participants: OWNER GTNTINVESTMENTSLLC ROGER TOLLEFSON PO BOX 698 MINOT ND 58702 License: APPUCANT SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATO2/2 I 2005 Phone: 970-476-4433 1OOO S. FRONTAGE RD W. SUITE 3OO VAIL co 81657 License: Project Address: 325 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 325 FOREST ROAD Legal Description: Lot: 18 Block: 7 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FIUNG 1 Parcel Numberz 210707 L13022 Comments: see conditions of approval DRB Number: DR8050064 0212412005 Phone: 701-852-5231 Motion By: Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Approvalr 03/11/2005 Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. web: www.vailoov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request:UAf,oH t/64 Location of the Propos ^1, tot, /8 enct<.: "7 subdivision: VA/C VtCl*g nU,F/d'1 Physical Address:44 fqzdtr ,(4b ! tr ! tr X ! ParcelNo.: ltOtOl(t 3b i A (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning:A/b/4 Name(s) of Owner(s):Pwz TZ//EF6o,l Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: 4/a Phone: E-mail Address:fa)s-16;gt^ee*Lt , --rI Type of Review and Fee: tr Slgns E Conceptual Review New Construction Addition Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) l"linor Alteration (single-family/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request $50 Plus $1,00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 Construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 An addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 Minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 Minor changes to buildlngs and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 Revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee e. +-Las Meeting Date: Planner:G February 22,2005 Mr. Matt Gennett Town of Vail Community Development 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: Lot #18, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing Dear Matt: Enclosed herewith are three sets of plans showing the proposed minor alternations to the Lot #18 project on Forest Road. For your convenience, I have clouded these revisions on the plans. Let me know if you have any questions or need any further materials. Best regards, SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS KAS/rt enc. Kurt A. Segerberg, A.l.A. President erberg,avhew & Assoc iates Architects. P.C., A.l.A. Nlail: P.O Box 4100 . vail, CO lvtain Office: Eaele-\h | . l0l tae e Rodd. Bldq Denver Offrce: lol? wazee Slreel.- Sutte C: : t1658 . e-mail: info(alsmarchs.com 6 . Avon. Co 81620 ' phoner 970 476 4433 Denver. Co 80202 ' phoner 303 623 3355 hltp:r'lwww. smarchs.com fai: 9?0 476 4608 fax: 303 62J 2262 oj f,*** * ***** * ** * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * + + * * * * * * * ******** *:f****r.'r.1.*** * *********** + + * * * * * * * + + * * * * * * * + * * TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Statement {.** * *:t*** * * *******!t** * ****** ***** * ***** * * * ** *** 'Nt*****{.* {. ***** * * * * * * + + * * * * ** ** * * * * ********* ** Statement Nunlcer: R0500001,74 Amounts: $20.00 02/24/2O05O3:30 PM Palrment Met.hod : Check #12954 / SEGERBERG& MAYHEW ASSOC. Init: .fS Notation : Permit No: Parcel- No: Sit.e Address : Location : 'rhis Pa)ment: ACCOI.INT ITEM LIST: Account Code DR 0 010 0003 LL2200 DRBo50054 2LOL07 LL3 022 325 FOREST RD VAIL 325 FOREST ROAD $20.00 Descript ion I\4)e: DRB- Chg to Appr P]ans Total Fees: Total ALL Pmts : Balance : $20.00 $20.00 $0.00 DESIGN REVIEW FEES Current Pmts 20.00 October 5. 2005 Mr. Maft Gennett Town of Vail Community Development 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 RE: LOT #18 - 325 FOREST ROAD Dar Matt: Thank you for taking the time last week to meet with John Sunderland and me at the Lot #18 duplex. As a follow-up to our meeting, I have created drawings which show the crawl space configuration for the east unit. We will be maintaining the 5'-0" crawl space height as reviewed which will be accessible by means of two 3'-0" x 3-0" access panels. All crawl spaces throughout the project will meet required building codes, i.e. ventilation and fire protection, as required. Please let me know if you need any further information. Best regards, SEGERBEG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS l(AS/lrt Cc: John Sunderland (c/o Sunder, Inc.) Segerberg, Mayhew &Associates Architects,P. C.,A.I . A. I\tril: PO Nlain Office: Denver Office: Box 4700 !hil, CO E1658 ' e-mail: infoagsmarchs com ' http:r'ww$ smarchs com Eaale-\'ail . l0l Eacle Road. Bldc o . Avon. CO ElblO ' phonc: g;0 176 {lll ' fax: 970 476 4608 -f6f7 \'a^e Street' Surle C2 i Denrer. (O E020: . nhone: .103 o2l ll55 ' fax: JOl 62i 2262 I ,ON IgV ;Jats laa.€.o-.1.1/ ..,"+z g E € z q €@€ .x c r €€Q.€' a z.q €@€.P r gQ gt' g Lr' @Lg 1)xe J €€, t' qLr' @Lg'lc r e@a@e oP?)oloc '.!D^u.o L€qle _oPuolo) 'ltc^ e-2 .1tre leerr€ aezEYn Ll9l @@€. 'l.qn p9od .o"ruo)J'Q, Qapl e7?e1t4?rv 6e7epoe6v t maqSp!,J 'Enqndaq ,Je^d l!914o '9'71 fe nen :uo!6!^aB ?f zf.1'"'"o awl ya'+l !?-',- i@,tl .^t 4l i Io4 'ppe1"1 1ea!'or; H {.\ T s l I 'oN lgv :Jed 14a|.,6 tel?4 vl,v/t zqtc€,aqEot ,""t q€€€€zlE@€ 1?r g@gf sLr'@L6.xeJ €€,v'qt?'@L6'lc! zQz@e oP?Jolo) 'E^tDo Lqqtg ^oP9blo? 'ltc^ z-t 9rln€ 1..)1q cczeffi Llql @o€. i.rc{I\ Pcod ao?tuo)! Q, Q,Q,Q)| a1?e1ql?rv eelet?o;av I maL,lfiP! 'Enq.rc6a6 :Jad I!P1aO 4,freu rta :uo!€!^ad 9e/g/e1 ,.teo :'t4d -tfi{ 9+t-<l + )4 ,auaN r:alorr !4,/oYq61 ,t \- tr $s $s -t \*I I I t I I T l- 1-i i ii li r1 + 1___ $1 (i -+r $ rq \\\\- .'.' \ [{ i . _;-rus,;E}-T- I r- i -J t t/ -! r' _l .' N +n $D G ir I I .\t -r ' I --l '--r t Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel'. 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us Proiect Name: GTNT NEW DUPLEX DRB Number: DR8040543 Project Description: NEW PRIMARY/SECONDARY DUPLEX CONSTRUCNON Participants: OWNER GTNT INVESTMENTS LLC TOILII2:OOA Phone: 701-852-5231 ROGER TOLLEFSON PO BOX 698 MINOT ND 58702 License: APPUCANT SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATIOILL|1004' Phone: 970-4754433 1OOO S. FRONTAGE RD W. SUilE 3OO VAl- co 81657 License: ARCHITECT SEGERBERG, MAYHEW & ASSOCIATI0/ LL | 2004 Phone: 97 0-47 6-4433 1OOO S. FRONTAGE RD W. SUITE 3OO VAIL co 81657 License: C000001762 ProjectAddress: 325 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 325 FOREST ROAD Legal Description: Lot: 18 Block: 7 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 Parcef Numberz 2L0L07LL3O22 Comments: See conditions BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Rogers Action: APPROVED Second By: Mathias Vote: 5-0-0 DateofApprovalt tL/Q312004 Conditions: Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. , .,-- , t conor zol -DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0006774 1) That the applicant, prior to applying for a building permit, shall adhere to the comments of the Public Works Department regarding the requirement of a revocable right-of-way permit/ returning grades to 2:1, and the submission of a revised site Dlan. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paldl $650.00 o Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 lel: 970.47 9.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General I nformation: Ail projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Ple6e refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request:Final review for new duplex construction. RECEIVM t]CT 1 1 2u;e TOV.COM.DEV. Location of the Proposal: Lot: 18 Block: 7 Subdivision: Vail Villase First Fi1 lng Physical Address:325 Forest Road Parcef No.: 2L0L07 LL3022 _ (Conlact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: - econdarY Name(s) of Owner(s): Roser To'l I ef son: Contner Mailing Address:P.O. Box 698 Minot. ND 58702 Phone:7 0L-852-523L Owner(s) Signature(s): /a z- Mailing Address:Vail. Co 8L657 phone: 970-476-4433 E_mail Address. ks egerberg€ smarchs Fax:47 6-4608 com $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. For corEtruction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercral building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee Type of Review and Fee: . Signs . Conceptual Review . New Construction . Addition . Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) . Minor Alteration (singlejamilyiduplex) . Changes to Approved Plans . Separation Request Sent GROUP INC;u?rrur,6 701e370177 ; |j!.AKUtrJ _ VAI L Sep - 29- 04 1O:04AM;o Page 1 tavua New Construction TO (Conbct Eagle Co' Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no') Application for Design Review Depanment of Community Dcvelopmenl 75 South Fmntage Road, Vail. Cotorado 81657 tdz 97 0.479.7739' I arz 97o.479 -2452 ureb: www.vallgov.com cJects requiring dcs'gn review must receive appronal prior.o subniting a. buildlnll Permlt apPlication. Please 6 tp sqLmfta reqlircrnenS for thc parttarlar approral drat ls reque$ed ' An apglicaHon for Deslgn Revfew It b€ agepted untii all rcqulred in5ormation is reietvcO by tfic Cdrmuntty Devtrlopment Deparrnent. The rnay also need b be rerrierrved by ttre Town Councit and/or the Plannlng Dnd Envlronmenbl Commisson' rcview appmval 1apees uni"o " building permlt Is Issued and spnsbuction commences wlthln of the R.cquest: of tlre Proposah Lot: Block: Subdivislon. Address: Inforrnation: yeer of the approval. s) of Owncr(s): ating Address: -Pt-Q'. s) Signature(s): me of Applicant: illng Address: Phone: Fat:Address: G o o o o of Review and re€: Sgns ConeptlJal Ret iew Nenv Constuctiqt Addidm Hlmr Alteratbn (mLilU-famlly/cDmnrercbl ) Hlrcr AlE ati,on (slnelehmi|/duPler) Cllaflges to APPGred Plans Sbpardoon Reeueil SS0 EE5 Sf .o0 ger equa{€ fot d t6tal slgn area' tlo Fee f6so Fa combr.rctim of a nefi buiUi.€ or deno/rcbuild' fz5o $20 f3oo ror an a&itJoo wfiere squlrc fodge ls .ddd b any rcsidentiat or .prn rt"rUtt bullding Gndudes 250 ddiuorrs & hierior (onYerdons)' ir .i*; At"nges to bulld]ms and dte ihprovemenB, $lch as, ;#;;9; paii'tirtg, windor"t ad<li6otrs' landscaping' fences ard rebinhg rrlllt, ctc. for m'rir cttarges tc buldi4E arrd ste irnprovemenE, such 6' r.r"nrg; pairiting, tvlndorY arJdluons, l.rdscaPlrE, feoces rdtainlnq Jlalls, et(' fzo . foi-t"J'aont 'to pt trs already a9Fovel bry Plannlng Selt or the Destgn RaMeu' Board' No Fee and ean+ Flw'TOLL,EFSONS RETAIL o'o'5''7018370177 i t"o.||oo 10:osAM;Page 2/5 TOLLEFSONS RETAIL o'oul5"7 o1 8370177 i ""oCoo 1o:osAM;Page 3/5 Sent By:RETAI L soNS o*o'5t'7o1a37o177 i ""o.5oo'r0:osAM; Page 4/5 LTG Policy No. CTAr500O5?05 I llcy No. 12106-174579 No, V500O5705 Schedule B policy does not insurc agairrst lo:rt or druUge (aud tlre ColrPany will not pay cos6' alrcrT yr' ftcs or;apelsctt) arise bv reason of: ExcL?tiorls: or clai.ns of parties i.n possc$sion rrot showrl by tlrc public reconls ' or clainrs of easenrsnLq, tr:t s[own by the public records ' :ics. conflicls i11 lsrrrrrd6ly li-oes, Shorfage inarea. cncroashrncntJ, and any facts which a c(rrrtct.quYey aod of the prcmiscs woulil di.vluse alrd which are uot shown by rhe public records- liur. or right tn a lieu, for servioes, labor, or maerial hurctotbrc or hctcaftcr tufllislEd' inrposcd by law and by thc public rccotds. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS NOT YET DUE:OR PAYABLE- oFPRoPRIEToRoFAVBINoR'LoDEToEXTRACTANDREMovEHISoRS sHoULDTHESAMBBEFoUNDToPENETRATBoRINTERSECTTHEPREMISE*s vBDINUMTEDsTATesPATENI.R.UCo|{DEDSEP].BUIBBR04,1923'INBooK T PAGE 98. T OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF TIIE ED S'TATES AS RtsSBRVED IN TJNTTED STATES PATENT R.ECORDED SEPTEMBER 04' . TN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98. COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT L'ONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR R.8VBR'TI'R C:I.AUSE' OMITTING ANY CPVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, @LOR' RELIGION. , TIANDIEAP. FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL OR.IGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO TI{E ENTTHATsAIDcovENANT(A)IsExEMPTUNDERcHAPTER42,sEcT|oN3607oF UNTTED STATES CODE OR (B) R.BLATBS TO I{ANT'IC3P BT]T ['OFS NOT TE AGAINST HANDICAPPED fBRSONS AS CONTAINBD IN INSTRUMENT RDBD AUGUST IO. 1962, IN BOOK I74 AT PAGE I79. (I)N D IT I ON S. L'O V IINAN I'S, RTjSTRIC'I'ION S, RBSERVATI'ONS AND NOTES ON RE@RDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FIR.ST FILING. EpFEcT OF wooD T|E WAI.I, AND GRAVBI. PAR'KING oNTo LoT 20 As SHowN oN ROVEMENT LOCATION CBRTTFICATE PREPARED JULY 8, 2OO4 BY LELAND LECHNER Chlcago I 9-04 1O:05AM;Page 5/5 7018370177;GBOUP INC;I HETAI L E FSONS T OLL Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fmcia Sofflts Windows Wndow Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting Other Building Materials PROPOSED MATERIALS Tvpe of MElerial Cedar shake Wood board & batten Stone Wood T&G Wood Clad Wood 2X Wood Wood stained Wood Wood/metal Stone Copper Stone N/A N/A Stone Attached to wall Color Tan Greylbrown blend Tan Tan Burgundy Tan Brown Brown Brown s tained Greylbrown blend Grey/brown blend Greylbrown blend (See Lighting Plan) Notes: Please specify the manufactureds name, the mlor name and number and attach a mlor chip. l%ge 6 of 12104101104 Oct 08 04 O2: OSp Bo-lanisall&nle Common Name PRCTDTFEF pafutr's j&tmouV€FtuT/ ""t=d"denson r s?Tsff;-?2o 1 uaf E Pun eX, 325 FqESf Ae+e Vrltt-, U PROPGiED IJA|{DSCAIIING Quantitv t8 p.2 Size a.s " AI{DSFRI'ES tca__fqwt S Sil?tuc-e a-P) o -t?-i ,-t.t/.|-tr-' e*put )raHr,#t+ Wt@ ?-o # < .5!-1tfrF6Jft*. FHa arr? {ur@t to PTWntut P4l4f fiW. fuE)nmt-tu @A l"eegt-t.w6 tbSE to gfb@n-gl,ffirr-SP----$tgaut:"p-rnraEh'o I' al7+€A esHYt jeA 4-/', l'lr, l-t?-'u4fr /) t'E". t-tL^_ t- lE t'frrPul,4lQ lfetiLq6 JtgFU 't-pl-!I2zl -t7 r I - tE ' U4f, flaeT+,ed*. sfrioe z-ry rJt-'@m- l. ), ,, B(STITIG TREES TO BE REMCA/ED Minimurn Requilements for tendscaping:Deiduous Trees - 2" GaliPer Coniferous Trees - 6' in height Shrubs - 5 C'al. Tvpe fgegss26ug @keNod(Et5 GROI'.IDCCNER soo SFD IRRIGAT]ON T\FESEROSION@NIROL lato lttttJ lote St, Pbase specis other landscape fuafurcs-(i.e. retaining walls, fenqes, srimming poots,-etg. )/iut b* ltr*urtl- 4'mdt ntF. l<ffi@ EES Ptttos Q Ufi*t +fy9 Fage 7 of 12l04l01l0d. IA LIGHTING SUHDULE FIXTURE TYPE B Berkeley: Sfall Mount ARROYO CRAFTSMAN LIGHT FIXTURES FIXTURE TYPE A Berkelev: Wall Mount Specifications Item # M-Ag7 Width I B-t/Zr Height t7,Proiection 1l' Waff Canopy 7-L12. Finish Shown Verdigris Patina Art Glass Shown Gold-White lridescent Art Glass Wattage 100 Sockets 1 Soecifications Item # M-A8G width 7' Height l4-l/4' Prolection 10' Walf Canopy 6-l/4' Finish Shown Verdigris Patina Art Glass Shown Gold-White lridescenl Art Glass Wattage lOO Sockets 1 Ilcrliclcr Oo l1 Bollard Solid bronze ond copper construclion provide mointenonc+free finishes. Electronic bollosts ore stondord for CF lomping ond provide low temp slorfing. Avoiloble with low wottoge metol holide lomping. Componion gorden light ovoiloble. ) SMIIX I,ANCH HOrrlEs NOVATO, CA l.'ARCH: ROYSION. HANAMOTO, Atl,EY & A8€Y €€: HANSfN & SAUGHIET I.TG. OESIGN: AUESBACH A GI'ASOW sHowN wrTH ornoNAt .HtPPEo Hooo'SAI.UIE T€5TAI,IANT IICHMOND- CA EI Sfraper Lighting Or ttNuA'nt*tuElr, e.3t=t - Lntnl,,u.' Sffi.ffirtr.armrc ,--r.wgl*rr nfrf UIEIDCHL- ['I'nf, hd u sc tt . ao at lt fi' 'ordrpcrdl r$rqlr)rtfcl'f FE]IFECLITE CO. l{6t E.adr 8lruot C|ovdrd, Oldo..l0l Oo oo r,i"{!l\:lr.f ,r rT;t,I,'i 'tzttetSl: ^ T' -i '-t'q$;i1?i.f, Wl$ LOT 18 325 FOREST ROAD Oo LOT 18 325 FOREST ROAD Oj orr oo LOT 18 325 FOREST ROAD oo oo *r"'r' LOT 18 325 FOREST ROAD tlv oo oo LOT 18 325 FOREST ROAD Lo/oE/o4 FRI 13:t.J e7o4764s08 srdARcrrs-o o woc UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION Thts form sewes ro veriry thar rhe rvlll not impact any existing or.proposed Jtility services, and also to verlry service av-ailability and toca6on fof ould be used h conjuncto.n r,yllh Preparir€ )rcur uUll.ptan and scheduling i.rar6uo*. A site plan, including and ele tions, shall be zubmhted to $€ follo\ ring ublitjes for appro'ral and verification. Auth,orized sign?Commellts QwEST 970.384.02s(fax) Conhds: scofr, Canington 970.458.6860 Jason Sharp 970.384.o238 EXCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) Contact Rich Sisneros qCEL ENERGY 970.262.4038 (fax) CDntacE: l(t Bqart 970.267.4024 Jirn O'neal 970.262.4003 COMCAST CABLE s7o.*+9,1224 x 112 (tel) 970.949.9138 (fax) Conhctj FloYd Salazar EAGLE Rn|ER WATER & SANTTATI( DISTRICT 970.475-7480 (tel) 970.476.4089 (fax) C.onbcL Fred Haslee ETEE l. r the utilty approrar E. \rermcauon torm has slgnahnes from each of the utility @mpanies, and no comments are made diredly on t form, the Town wltt presumetiaith;;;" no pribk't and be develoPment."n Proceed' z. If a utirity company has concerns wi tte utiriv represenhtive shat no* direcrry on the rnifiv verificati form that there Is a problem which ne e shoutd fr"n u" a"trriea in ;rn attached r'euer to the Town of V' However, please keep in mind that lt's *mp"nv and the applicant to resolve iderrtified problems- 3.'These verinadons do not relieve the cpntraEtDr of rhe resporsibility to obtain a P.uPlic Yvay Pem't from ttp Department of Public wot attheToarnofvan-utitivto-uon,.ust'uu9offi|ii.rIiiiir-'"vJe:sementwiffntheTownofva||.A a ODQIO n n..t a Publicl/V it The Dweroper is required and agrees to submit any revised dnwings to the udfi.i.es for r+approv'ar & reverificadon if the submitted pla are altered in any w-dy aner $re iuthorized signature date tr"f "it''oli"*tt" specifically nohd withi'r the comment area of tjr's form)' DeveloPet's Signature Paoe 8 of lAO4l28lO4 I ^^ i^r' This form seNes b verifr that the prglgsed improve utility services, ard also !o verifo ffff:,1'""i:Ty"1l"i:,fl"f,1H#,..,.T* l?.li#"T'iY,[,'g,:?'"#5.:':* verfrcarion, Autfiorized Siona'Comme tts Q[rrEsT 970.384,0257(fax) ConGcts: S<olt Carington 970.468,6850 Jason Sharp 970.384-0238 ECEL TIIG}I PRFSSURE GAS 970.252.{076 (tel) Conb<t: Rich Sisneros HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC e70.949.s892 (rd) 970.949.4565 (far) C-onbact: Ted Hsky EXCEL ENERGY 970.262.(1038 (far) ContacG: Kit Bogart 970.262.4024 Jim O'neal 970.252.4003 ^1 tllh>-Ulnt-''()cT 0I 200[ EAGLE R.N'ER, WATER, A SANTTA DISTRICT 970.475.7€0 (tel) s70.476.4089 (fax) Contact Fred Haslee GOMCAST CABI,E 97c.949,t2q r rlZ (Gl) s70.949.9138 (far) Contactr Floyd Salazar NOTES: i. If rhe utility approval & veril'lcation form has signah.rres from each of the utility companies, and ro comments are made directly on the form, tie Town will presurne rhar rhe/e are no problerns and th€ deyeloprnent cn proceed, 2. If r urjlity co.npany has cmcerns with the proposed constructim, Ute utiltty represenbtjve siall note dlrectly on fie udlity verificabon form that tfiere is a Pro6lern which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be deuiled in ar attactred leRer to dle Town of Vail. Hohever, please keep in mirtd that it is the fesponsibality of the urility company and the applicant t'o |esolve identified problems. 3. Tilese vedficOons do not reliwe t're contracbr of the responsibility td obtain a Public Way Permit from the Departsnent of Public Works at fie TOwn of Vail. UtitrW locations must be obb.jned befbre diooind in any public right.of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A bujllino Elmit is Fot a Publi( Wav oefihit and rnust be obhined serralFtelv. The Developer ls required dnd agrees b submlt arry rwised drawings b dG uulities for reapgroval {r re-verificafion if the submitH plans are alEred in any u,ay after the autJrorized signafure dafe (unless otherwir spccifically noted within the cornment area of this form). Deve{ope/s Sgnature Page 8 of LZlwlZSll4 OCT ffi t^a 13t 4'7 ,o ?.o+ xx TOTRL PCGE.Az x,r t - 6S2 -St s :116 Allorvcd , Existing .. pronoscd rotarGRFA + =Jd / nTrt)6d= prinrarycRFA _+(425)(6?5+)= !"d / * \,Ry' =|,4 SccondarycRFA .+(.12j)(675+) +ep: / * ?,qgtrd = -/'+/1 ZONE CHECK .I- Lcgal dcscription: Lot Addrcss Os.ncr Architcct Pbonc Phonc Zonc dishict Lor sizc Proposcd usc Brrildable arca * 6'15 = 425 crcdir plus 250 addition Docs ttris rcqucst involvc a 250.Addition? \ Horv much.of tic allovcd 2j0 Addirion is uscd with Ns rcqucst? Sitc Covcragc Hcigbt Sctbacks Fron t Sidcs Rcar 20' I <l 15, RctainingWall Hciglts Parki ng Caragc ircdit 1',/ 6', (300) (600) (e00) (1200) Drivovay Conrplics rvirh TOV Lighring Ordinancc Arc finirhcd gradcs lcss tlan 2:l (50%) Enrironmcntal4lazerds ' Ycs_ No 3)W Rcmaining qay F @ ?eF t\ ,4. LJ. v6z. J3, Landscaping 60ftr^^^ De/ @b _?_7 ---. 7dt 1o .{708 (a tl ,7 Enctoscd . Ycs-_,No Previous condirions ofapproval (cbcck propcrty fi lc): 1,4./.,a2_ ls tlrc propcrty n on-conforming?Dcscribc: Total 2BY, 7 U6p (30)(y/ 2) Floodplain 4) Watcr Coursc Sctback (30) (5 5) Gcologic Hazards a) Snorv Avalanch b) Roclfall c) Dcbris Florv . . sf?33YcrlJ cfelols A\ouS . (cped pue ssacre) ,(rarc,ruq snrprU Sultrml cBuregTBuuru4 .: seJuec . suopllqs.rl lEId sscuEUE .srop!uo3 ^rarn (p uno_6.rcp un) sap11r161 srFuv cprqs\uns u0Fsruur^.O,C scldurrs Flnls'ul Stnp lrng cl!s J0 s0l0tld ru.roJ uor:ecguarr 4rlUn (g ry v) poda: aprl pno:ddy opuo3 , SNOENV'I'ISCSIJ^I . pua6c1 sac4 pcsodo:4 - scc-q 6uFsx3 . twldsfYJSqNY-I D qcl!dJoou s1p6Furu;qcy cdqlglcperg clls :- uoqtruuof, c6ereg .-- sJruosl€&6:13ao (y) sfuuq.rcagTsc,re3'-- a5uc^oJ cJrS . qrEqtcs quruqcPolJus lq31a11 Surppng clBrs NV?d I.IIS D s[eljtlsr{voloc alsrs sNorJ.YAS-ia cMO.Iins D .nHa__ credg crg141,tuJ _- Ylllc lruoorDpE 0gz Ydu9 . clsrs __ sNyfduoo,Id n ;tl^Xns D :1ccfor.1 Isrfxcqjc /$xl^Tti Ncrsnq ,9'7A+6eC67? gaooz 70/o8/o4 04; 5:57PM; US WEST FRI r3:23 FAx s7o4(J8 SUARCHS -VA I L UTILITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION This form serves to veriry that the proposed lmprovements will not impact any existing or proposd tttility services, and also to veriry service availabilify and locatlon for new consbucton and should be used ln conjuncuon with preparirrg your utll:ty plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations. shall be submitGd to the following utilities for approval and veriFration . Authorized Siqna'Comm€rts QWEST 970.38a.0257(rax) Contacts: Scott carrington 970,458.6860 Jason Sharo 970.384.0238 EXCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 ltel) contact: Rich slsneros HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC 970.949.5892 (tel) 970.949.4565 (fax) Conbct: Ted Husky EXCEL ENERGY 970.262.4038 (fax) ContacLs: Kit Bogart 97 O.262.4D24 Jim O'neal 970.252.4003 1o/r r/ov EAGLE RryER WATER & SANTTATII DISTRICT e7o.476.74ao (tel) 970.476.4089 (fdx) Conbct: Fred Haslee COMCAST CABLE 97O.949.L?24 r 112 (teJ) 970.949.9138 (fax) ContacE Floyd Salazat NOTES: 1- If the utility approvat & verification form has signahlres from each of the utttity companiee, and rro comments are made direcdy on the form, the Town will presume that there are no pmblems and the dwelopment can proceed' Z. If a utllity company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility represenbtive shall note directly on the utility verification fDrm thar there ii a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in a:r attached lefrer to the Town of Vail. However, please keep In mlnd Srat it is Sre responsibility of tire utility company and the applir:ant to .€soVe identified problems- 3. These veriflcauon obtain a Public Way Permlt from the Departnent of Public works at the Town of Vail. ny publlc right-of-way or eEsernent within ttle Town of Vail. A buildino oermit is not a Public Wav oermlt and must be obtained seoaratelv. The Developer is required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval tt re-verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after th" i,rtttorir.d signatuie da(e (unless olhenarise specifically noted within the comment area of thrs form)' DevelopefS Slqnatufe Page 8 of rzlo4lzSlM vut 'd5'*"OCT E8 'E,4 T6149 FR XCEL ENERGY 97A 26.2 4a'3 P.92 rsl vu4 UTNTTY APPROVAL & YER,IRCATIO'{ -fhis form seryes b vetit that the Drogosed improvernenB will flot impact utility services, and also to verify seNice availability and location for ne$, cons udllcn and shotrld be used in rg your utility plan and scheduling installadons. A site plan, indqding grading p[an, floor plan, and elevations, rToilowing .,titiii", roi ipp.o"a -na verificadon, A-u tfi,orizod Siona'Comme rb QWEST 970.381,0257(far) Contacts: Scott Carrington 970.458,5960 Jason Sharp 970.384.0238 EXCEL HICH PR,ESSURE GAS 970.252.4076 (tel) Conhct; Rich Sisneros HOLY CR,OSS ELECTR,IC 970.949.s892 (rd) 970.949.4565 (far) Conbct: Ted Htrky EXCEL ENER,GY 970.252.€38 (fax) @ntaE: Kit Bogart 97 0.26j-4024 Jim o'neal 970.252.4003 EAGLE RTYER WATER. & SANTTA DISTR,ICT s70.475,74€0 (rEt) 970.476.4{t89 (fax) Conbct: Fred Haslee COMCAS? CABLE 97a.949,t22+ t 11Z (Gl) 970.949.9138 (far) Contact; Flovd Salazar lIOTES: tx.rlrlin flfuc"*',ocT 0I z00t y4,/7;t J,,--4 ,o?.c)+ / O -tzv/ 1' If the utility approval & verilicauon form has signabrres from eacfr of the utility conrpaniet and ro corfimenG are hade circcuy on the fgrm, tie To\,yn wltl preurne rhar drere arE no problens and the deveropment can prociea, z' If s uuliry comPany has cqncerns with the proposed consvuction, the utiliV represenbtive shall note dlrectly on e udliry venflcation form that tiere is a probletn which needs to be resolved. The issle should then be deEiled in at attad€d lEner to dle Town of vail.Hohever, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve identified Droblems. 3. nrese verificatioru do not relieve the contractor of the respansibilig to obtain a public way permit from the Department of public Work at $e Town oF veil. in any public right-of-way or easement wlthin the Town of va _ A The Developer ls required and agrees b subrnlt arry rwised drdwings to the uulities for re.apgrovEl {r re.verificatjon if the submitEd plans are alhred in any way after the a tthorized signature dah (unless Jthen^rise specifielly noted within the comment area of this form). Develope/s Signafure page 8 of LZl04lzBl04 ACf AA tAa 13: a?xx TOTRL PFGE. A2 )kx ,o oo oo Lo/08/o4 FRI 13:3o FAX 9704764SOE oj S ARCIIS.YAIL laoo2 UTII,ITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION ThE form sewes ro veriry that thQ Jtllily seNi iervicp av-ailability and lo@tion for tg your utll inruttutio*. A site plan, including following verlfication. Auth.orized Sione cotnmetlE ezc-s+sjg+{teD qfr' gzs.tfEqsso (r.Dq{5-con't:.WEhd: QwEST 970.3E4.025/(fax) ConbcB: Scoft Carrington 970.468'6860 Jason Sharp 970.384.0238 EXCEL HIGH PRESSURE GAS 970.262.4076 (tel) Con'€ct: Rich Sisneros HOLY 6ROSS ELECTRTC E(CEI ENERGY 970.262.4038 (fax) @ntacts: Klt Bogart 970-262-NZ4 lim O'neal 970.2.62--1003 col'{cAsT CAELE 97a.s49,7224 x r12 (tel) g70.949.9118 (fax) conhcE FloYd Salazar buildin EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANilATI( DISTRICT -470.476-7480 (tel) 970.a76.4089 (fax) @ntact Fred Haslee NoTES: L-- -r-r>F, dac rrd'r no comments are made directly on the iT 0'16 udtity approvat & verifietion Form has slgnatures from f#,'th-- T;h,nht presume that there are no problems and the z. rr a utiriv c6mpany has concerns wi l$AtJ;:f'[#.,tff,H'YJfl|'ffil form that there ls a problem which ne resolve idenfiFed problems- However, please keep in mind that It is 3 rhese verinauon :f,tfll i fil'l:H;lJ:i::iaT.tr il:l",HfllTir,,?5 *;'u at g1e Town oF Vail. eratelv. buildino nermlt Ls not a Pub rhe Deveroper is required and aerees to 'y!1t-ily^Y'ffi:fllllijlff liil;:Jiil ""r,TJf;fi1,.l1't-H*-J?:i:*'dltH't'* The DeveloPer rs requrreo'"T9ulTl-"i:".olt;;;il";tt (untess otherwise specifically aie altered in anY waY after th DeveloPefs SignatJre Paoe 8 of 1U04/28/04 ('d i09'0\l nrr t[ 1 (ent'r I -|l1..][\d0[ :Z il]0Z '8 '.i.30 oo o3 Lo/08/o4 FRI 13:30 FAX 970476460g ##gms#*?7 r;:EE-.:---att.tj tYD ].'vl SUARCf,S-VAIL ?oPOCRAPHIe SUR\i€Y '"1['$i,llff *r, lr" ou* o YOtrN OF VXL EacLE eoutrrY, coLoRADo @ oo4 ufz i:15 (,/.|',7. E€rut}rv#Fr eF EY tta, 7bt A E€IU! YIII i09 0N /\eNIN: SS0iC /\l0||LXdlirz i00['B'1]0 Ot o1 70/o8/o4 FRI 13:$o FAX 9?04784808 sy6115gg-vaIL t fi'r .iLi:$r$! |7h lrlta t I t 'd i09'0N ,\0U:[3 SS0l] ,\l0F tllc[:e i00Z B 1JC * * * * * *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * {. ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * ** **** * * * * '1. * * * * 'i 'i* * {.{.:i* *{.*** * TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement *******'r**********i * * * *. * * * * * * * ** * ** * ***** ** * * * * * * {. *** * * * i. * * * * *:i* * *r. * 't * t * *:r'F*:fi.:t* * * * {. * * *:F* * * * Stsatement Nunlcer: R040006874 Amount: $650.00 LO/ff/2OO4L2:35 PM Pay'ment Method: Check Init : ,JS Notation: #6299IKITRT SEGERBERG Permit. No: DR8040543 T)4)e: DRB - New Construction Parcel DIo: 210107).).3022 Site Address: 325 FOREST RD \IAIL LocaEion: 325 FOREST ROAD Total Fees: 5650.00 This PalmenE: $650.00 Total AIrIr Pmts: $550.00 Bal-ance: 50.00 ** **,i * * * *** * *,r * * * * * * * * * * * * * *{! * * **!r** ***************** ** {. * i. '} * * * * * * * {. i.'* * * * {. {. * * * * * *** **'*:t * * * * ** ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Cunrent Pmts DR OOiOOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI'J FEES 650.00 o t I I t I I I I I I I I I I t I I I t I I 'l I .t I t t ) I t I ) Tree Preservation Report 325 Forest Road Vail,Colorado Prepared for: Segerberg Mayhew Architects 1000 S.Frontage Road West, Suite 300 Vail. CO 81657 November 1,2004 Rick Herwehe Certified Arborist #RM-21 95 A Cut Above Forestry P.O. Box 7133 Breckenridge, CO 80424 I I I I I I t I I I I t I t I I I I I t I t I t T I I t I T I I Table of Contents I I I I I r t I I t I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Byrdie Cumming, rr.. rtution Plan A Cut Above Forestrv Inc.Page 1 r1t2/2004 Summary On October 11,2004, Kurt Segerberg, Architect and principalof Segerberg Mayhew Architects met with me at the residence located at 325 Forest Road in Vail. Colorado. Kurt provided me with a site plan for the proposed project. We walked the property; Kurt located the house placement and identified the building envelope and lot corners for me. Kurt informed me that the owners were concerned about saving the spruce trees, especially the large, specimen trees because they provide privacy and offer the wooded effect they desired in a mountain home. lf possible, trees #1 , #2 and #3 will work as focal points in the building design. The trees on the east and south side provide a green screen between the The Segerberg-Mayhew project will include building a duplex units and the necessary infrastructure such as a driveway, drainage and landscaping. The site will be landscaped after the house is finished according to a landscaping plan developed by Dennis Anderson and approved by the Town of Vail Planning Commission. Engfemann spruce (Picea englemanii) and aspen (Populus tremuloides) are the predominate tree species on the property. One lodgepole pine tree is present on the west side of the existing house but will be removed fro the construction. Most of the trees are in good to fair condition. The Englemann spruce trees range from 8-inches to 27.5 inches in diameter. None of the large, coniferous trees will be removed for construction. According to the site plan, A few aspen trees and five conifers greater than 8 inches in diameter will be removed. I recommend removing one tree that is interfering with the crown of tree #4. The recommended prescriptions to mitigate potential construction stress are summarized in the following table. t I I I I t I t I I I I I t I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I Byrdie Cumming, rr." r.tution Plan A Cut Above Forestry Inc.tU2/2004 Introduction Home construction in the mountains is a difficult task and can be@me more complex when tree preservation is involved. Yet, mature trees offer invaluable benefits to the landscape that relatively small transplants cannot. When properly planned for, trees need not complicate the development process. To insure a successfultree preservation plan, five areas must be addressed;the existing site conditions, potential construction impacts, mitigation tactics and techniques, prescriptions for tree health before, during and after construction, and monitoring tree health and contractor compliance during construction. The Segerberg Mayhew project will include demolishing some of the existing building and replacing it with two larger structures with a more modern design. The parking areas will be enlarged and moved closer to the buildings. The existing water and sewer lines will be used. The disturbed areas will be landscaped boulders, native grasses a water feature and native trees per the landscape plan prepared by Dennis Anderson Associates. Purpose The purpose of this plan is to provide tree preservation and management guidelines for the property owners and their contractors. The guidelines will address tree preservation measures to retain healthy native trees all around the remodel. Present Tree and Site Condition The site is located at325 Forest Road in Vail Colorado. Currently, the site is occupied by a single family home built in the 1970's. The house has a small All trees should be inoculated with myconhizae fungi and treated with a root stimulating fertilizer. Unless othenvise specified, the critical root zone (or as much as possible) shall be fenced with plastic construction fencing and reinforced with hay bales to minimize soil migration into the crz. The fenced area shall be covered with a 6" layer of tree chips. Any excavation in the crz shall be supervised by a certified arborist. Any roots greater than 1/2 inch in diameter shall be pruned with a sharp tool and documented. Any branches that may interfere with construction should be pruned by an arborist prior to construction. "Claw hammer pruning" by the General Guidelines Trees # 6,7,8,9,1 1,12,1 3,1 4,1 5,16 Trees shall be fenced with chain link fencing and silt fencing placed inside of the chain link. An arborist shall be present during excavation around these trees since the excavation will encroach into the CRZ. 1,2, 3 and 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I r I I I t I I I I I Byrdie Cumming, r.." e.t"tion Plan A Cut Above Forestry Inc.Page 3 1r/2/2004 parking pad located in the southeast corner. A stairway provides access from the street to the front door The existing structure is surrounded by three developed lots to the east, west and north. Forest Road bounds the south side of the property. All trees greater than 8.0" in diameter are identified on the site map. The trees that will be directly impacted during construction have been assigned identification numbers. The trees are marked with numbered, yellow flags and identified on the site plan prepared in October 2004 by Segerberg Mayhew Architects. Engf emann spruce (Picea englemanif), aspen (Populous tremuloides) are the two tree species found on the site. Trees on the site vary in height from 45 feet to 85 feet tall. Tree diameters range from 8.0 inches to 27.5 inches. Tree diameter was measured at 4.5' above the ground (diameter standard height). Crown diameter (Figure 1), the distance from branch tip to branch tip to the edge of the branches, a.k.a. the dripline, varies from 1O-feet to24feet. The dripline is an indicator of the root system. Although roots can extend far beyond the dripline, a high concentration of absorbing roots is typically present between the dripline and the trunk. Crown rafios (Figure 2) vary from a high of 90% to a low of 40%. Crown ratio is an important indicator to tree health and vigor. A low crown ratio means the tree has less green foliage to perform produce food. Generally, we can assume the less food production, the weaker the plant and the less likely it is to survive the stress of construction. Scale insect on the spruce trees is the only insect problem evident in any of the tree species. No pathogens are present on the conifers. The soils around the house likely have urbanized characteristics such as compaction, lacking organic matter inputs, bacterial dominated and poorly drained. Characteristics that are uncommon in the soils of native conifer forests. t1/212004 o I t I I I I I r I I I I I t I I I I I I I t I I I I t I I I I I Bwdie Cumminn. rr"" Prtution Plan A Cut Above Forestrv Inc. Example: Crown Ratio of 75% Figure 1- Crown Radius Diameter 5tandard Height Crown Diameter Byrdie Cumming, rr"" rrJationPlan A Cut Above ForesEy Inc. The measurements and disturbance are outlined I I I I I t I I I t I t r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I Page 5 specifications trees that are in the following table. 1U2/2004 located close to the area of Condition Comnt Soil Compaction, Bole I Scale insects Soil Compaction, a few and liqht scale. Healing wound, slight c scale insects Asymmetrical, no branc south. Some dead Asymmetrical, no branc south side. Crook, nee< and a few ar Asynmetrical, no branc west. Asymmetrical, no bran( bottom or east. scale insects. De€ Bark inclusive fork. dea scale insects Soil Compaction, trunk two 8- inch stems, som in crown. Concrete pad and rock located 2-feet to west o Bole wound on south si Short branches. some ( Scale insects metrical crown Pruning stubs from imp Foliage is chlorotic, sca crown has a few bald Condition Rati Pien = Englemann Spruce ree Tree # Roots Trunk Scaffold Branches Twigs Foliage Rating Condition ,|3 3 4 ^19 Good 2 4 4 4 4 3 19 Good 3 4 4 4 4 4 20 Good 4 4 4 4 4 20 Good 5 t 4 J 4 18 Fair 6 4 3 J 4 18 Fair 7 4 4 J 4 4 19 Good I 4 4 4 4 19 Good I I I I I I I I t r t I I t I I t I I t I I I I t I I I I I I I Byrdie Cumming, rrr" Pr"ltion Plan A Cut Above Foreshy Inc.Page 6 r1/2/2004 Total Points 23-25 t9-22 l5- l8 l1-14 05-10 Total Points Condition Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Rating 90-100 70-89 50-69 2549 05-24 Gonstruction lmpacts Most trees on the site will be either directly or indirectly impacted by the project. The indirect effects include changes in water from grade adjustments, chemicals leaching into the soil and changes in local wind patterns due to lot clearing. Direct impacts are those activities that invade the critical root zone the crown, the trunk or require the tree to be removed. This construction project will directly impact 5 conifers greater than eight-inches in diameter by removal. The project will encroach upon the critical root zone of 8 trees. The remaining trees on the lot may be exposed to minor impacts from changed run-off, changes in localwind patterns and potential changes in pH and chemical leaching. Tree condition, age and species all affect how well a tree will stand up to construction stress. Trees that are already in poor health from disease, insect damage, soil compaction, nutrient deficiencies, overcrowding or being overtopped are a serious disadvantage when it comes to surviving construction stress. Young trees are generally adaptable and have a better chance at surviving the environmental changes that occur during construction. The reason young trees are more likely to survive is that trees live on an energy cycle that produces a surplus of energy during the summer months and a deficit in the spring during bud break. Young and middle aged trees, those in the growth and structural stage of life, generally produce an adequate amount of energy to grow and provide defenses against insects, disease and environmental stresses. This typically holds true for one or two growing seasons assuming the stresses and damages are not too severe. As trees reach the mature and overmature stages Tree # Roots Trunk Scaffold Branches Twigs Foliage Rating Condition 9 4 4 4 3 18 Fair 10 4 3 4 4 3 18 Fair 11 3 3 4 4 4 18 Far 12 3 4 4 4 4 19 Good 13 4 4 4 4 4 20 Good 14 4 4 A 4 J 19 Good 15 4 4 4 4 5 19 Good 16 4 4 4 4 4 20 Good 17 4 4 4 J J 19 Good t T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I By,rdie Cumming, rr"" r.Jtron Plan A Cut Above Forestry Inc. Page 7 lll2/2004 of their lives, they are only producing enough energy to break the buds in the following growing season. Any root loss causing a reduction in stored energy or absorption capabilities will likely result in rapid decline and eventual death for the tree. Tree species respond differently to construction impacts. Englemann spruce trees are moderately tolerant of root removal and intolerant of backfill soil compaction but will tolerate moderately drained soils but soil compaction will cause a slow death to roots (Clark and Metheney). The following table summarizes the existing trees, specie, estimated development stage, condition and the potential impacts of construction. Mitigation Measures Typically, the healthier the tree, the more likely it is to remain a contributing part of the landscape for many years after the project is completed. The first step in Condition and Tree #Specie Dev. Stase Gondition Construction lmpacts 1 Pien Mature Good Soil compaction, root loss from excavation for entrance and change in drainage. Potential damage to foliage and likely need fro pruninq for entrance. 2 Pien Mature Good Soil compaction, root loss from excavation, change in drainage, backfill over part of root zone, loss of lower foliage to accommodate structure. 3 Pien Mature Good Soil compaction on south side, some minor root disturbance and ootential for backfill on north 25% of root zone. 4 Pien Mature Good Soil compaction on north side, some minor root disturbance and potential for backfill on north 25o/o of root zone, loss of foliage to accommodate construction 5 Pen Struct Far No direct imDacts from construction. 6 Pien Struct Far No direct impacts from construction. 7 Pien Struct Good No direst imDacts from construction. I Pien Shuct Good No direct impacts from construction. I Pien Struct Fair No direct impacts from construction. 10 Pien Mature Fair No direcl impacts from construction as long as fencing stays in place. 11 Pien Struct Fair No direct impacts from construction as long as fencing stays in olace. 12 Pien Struct Good No direct impacts from construction as long as fencing stays in olace. 13 Pien Struct Good Soil compaction on south side, some minor root disturbance and ootential for backfill on north 25oA ol rool zone. 14 Pen Struct Good No direct impacts from construction as long as fencing stays in Dlace 15 Pien Growth Good No direct imoacts from construction. 16 Pien Growth Good No direct imoacts from construction. 17 Pien Growth Far No direct imoacts from construction. t I Byrdie cumming. rr"" rtionPlan I A Cut Above Forestry Inc. Page 8 lll2lzffi4 maintaining healthy trees during construction is to bring the trees to the best I possible health and condition before the project is started. This can be done by insuring adequate soil moisture for as long as possible prior to construction,I testing-the soil and applying fertilizer if ne6essary, inoculating the soilwith I mycorrhizae fungiand root stimulating fertilizer. I The second concern is to identify, protect and treat the critical root zone (cz) throughout the construction process. Protect the crz with construction fencing I and install a 6-inch layer of chips on top of the existing soil. Standard plastic fencing should be adequate for the disturbance area perimeter but the large I diameier trees close to the construction activities should be protected with chain I link and silt fencing. r Recommended Tree Protectaon Zone - t-=:---n--Tree #! 14 lJlamerer in Feet Tree #TPZ Diameter in Feet 1 24 10 23 2 36 11 l8 3 28 12 24 4 24 13 22 5 t2 14 l8 6 t2 15 15 7 20 16 26 8 12 17 t8 Unfortunately, construction space constraints do not always allow protection of the recommended crz in these cases; individual prescriptions are prepared for the trees to mitigate the potential problems created by disturbing the root zone The landscape plan prepared by Dennis Anderson Associates will address tree replacement. I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I Protection able 5 Tree #Prescriotion General Guidelines Trees # 6,7,8,9, 1 1,12,13,1 4,1 5,16 All trees should be inoculated with mycorrhizae fungi and treated with a root slimulating fertilizer. Unless otherwise specified, the critical root zone (or as much as possible) shall be fenced with plastic construction fencing and reinforced with hay bales to minimize soil migration into the crz. The fenced area shall be covered with a 6" layer of tree chips. Any excavation in the crz shall be supervised by a certified arborist. Any roots greater than 112 inch in diameter shall be pruned with a sharp tool and documented. Any branches that may interfere with construction should be pruned by an arborist prior to construction, "Claw hammer pruning" by the construction crew is prohibited. 1,2,3 and 4 Trees shall be fenced with chain link fencing and silt fencing placed inside of the chain link. An arborist shall be present during excavalion around these trees since the excavation will encroach into the CRZ. I I I t I I I I I t I I I t I t t I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I Byrdie Cummhg, rr." rreQution Plan A Cut Above Forestry Inc. Page 9 Specifi cations for Tree Preservation General rr/2t2004 1. Prohibited Activities Adiacent to Trees The following activities shall be prohibited within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree subject to the requirements of this ordinance. A. No materials intended for use in construction. or waste materials accumulated due to excavation or demolition, shall be placed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree. B. No equipment shall be cleaned, or other materials or liquids deposited or allowed to flow over land, within the limits of the critical root zone of a protected tree. This includes, without limitation, paint, oil, C. No signs, wires, or other attachments other than those of a protective nature shall be attached to any protected tree. D. No vehicular and/or construction equipment traffic or parking shall take place within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree other than on an existing paved street or parking lot. This restriction does not apply to single incident access within the critical root zone for purposes of clearing underbrush, establishing the building pad and associated lot grading, vehicular traffic necessary for routine utility maintenance or emergency restoration of utility service or routine mowing operations. E. No grade changes in excess of two inches (2") (cut or fill) shall be allowed within the limits of the critical root zone of any protected tree unless adequate construction methods are utilized which have been approved by the Building Official. F. No paving with asphalt, concrete or other impervious materials in a manner which may reasonably be expected to kill a tree shall be placed within the limits of the critical root zone of a protected tree except as otherwise allowed in this ordinance. f nstall and maintain a 4"-6" layer of mulch within the tree protection zone. The mulch will help reduce soil compaction and moderate soiltemperature. 2. Fertilizinq A. Deep root feed all spruce and pine trees to be preserved. I I Bgdie Cumrning, rr"" r.Jution Plan I A Cut Above Forestry Inc. Page l0 tu2/2004 I B. Feed with a root stimulating fertilizer. I G. Feeding will be performed in a radial pattern with the feeder needle being - inserted 8-10" below the soil surface. Insertions will be made at 18" intervals on t the edge of the drip line. t D. The first feeding shall include an inoculatio n wilh mycorrhizae fungi.I 3. Fencinq I r A. Fence all trees to be retained to completely enclose the tree protection zone,r as indicated in table 3 and the ar companying staging plan map, prior to clearing I or grading. Plastic snow fencing attached to metal posts driven into the ground will be acceptable fencing unless otherwise specified in table 4. lf the fencing is I c,ontinually damaged or torn down, it shall be replaced with chain link fencing. Fences will remain until construction is completed. Fencing on the uphill side I of the trees will be re+nforced with silt fence or hay bal-es to minimize soil I migration beyond the fence line. I B. Construction traffic and material storage must remain outside of the fenced areas at all times.I I 4. pruninq f A. Prune dead branches from trees around the house.I B. Prune branches to provide adequate clearance for scaffolding and t construction crew. I G. Pruning shall be performed or supervised by a certified arborist. The tree I service must provide proof of insurance for liability and workers compensation. I D. All pruning will be within the Tree Pruning Guidelines (lnternational Society of Arboriculture) and adhere to American National Standard for Tree Care I Operations (ANSI A300) t E. Any additional tree pruning needed for clearance will be performed by an I arborist, and not by construction personnel. 5. Root Pruning A. Alf encountered roots over l12inch in diameter will be cut off with a sharp tool. I I I I I I l0 I I Byrdie Cumming. r."" rr;udon Plan t A Cut Above Forestry Inc. Page 1l 11/2/2004 t B. Root will be pruned with a sharp shovel, saw or by-pass pruning tool. I G. Root pruning will be performed prior to stumping and grubbing. I D. Root pruning shall be performed or supervised by a certified arborist. I E. Roots should be exposed by hand, with an air spade or with a small I excavator. Any digging to expose roots shall be done parallel to the tree to avoid breaking or tearing roots.I I Monitoring Tree Health and Gomptiance I Successful tree preservation programs start during the planning phase t when critical design decisions are made. However, activities in the construction r and post-construction phases are critical to successful tree preservation. In other r words, trees cannot be preserved during construction but they can be killed I during construction. I Monitoring tree health and compliance during construction helps ensure that the program and details specified in this Tree Preservation Plan are properly I implemented. The monitoring phase of the plan is fourfold: 1) Maintain the r integrity of the Tree Protection Zone,2) Assist with field changes, 3) Continually r evaluate tree health and injuries, and 4) Communicate with the superintendent, I Segerberg Mayhew Architects, Dennis Anderson and Associates Landscape Architects and the Town of Vail Flanning Department.I Inspections will be more frequent during the early phases of the project. I During the excavation phase and the early stages of material delivery and r staging, inspections will occur weekly or bi-weekly. After the kinks are worked r out, inspections will occur on a monthly basis or upon request of the contractor, I architect, owner or building department. I Inspections will be document on form 1-4 and copies made available to the contractor and Segerberg Mayhew Architects,I I I I I I I I I ll I f Byrdie Cumming, rr"" rrttion Plan I A Cut Above Forestry Inc. I I I I I I I r I r t I I I T T I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 12 Reference rv2/2004 Certified Arborist Certifi cation Proqram Studv Guide. Intemational Society of Arboriculture, 1991 Matheny, Nelda P. and James R. Clark. Trees and Development. A International Society of Arboriculture, 1 997. Shigo, A.L. A New Tree Bioloqv. Duram, NH, Shigo and Trees, 1986. t2 I I Byrdie Cumming, r."" r.es utionPlan I A Cut Above Forestry Inc.t1l2/2004 I I I I I t I I T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I Page 13 Glossary Grown The upper part of a tree, including the branches and foliage. Grown diameter (Dripline) The distance from the trunk of the tree to the edge of the branches. DSH or Diameter Standard Height The diameter of a tree measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. Live Grown Ratio The percent of the tree trunk that supports live green foliage. Mycorrhizae Mycorrhizae are organs made up of tree and fungus tissues that facilitate the absorption of phosphorus-containing ions and others essential elements for growth. b) Non-woody roots that are infected by beneficial fungi are called mycorrhizae. Mycorrhizae are organs that facilitate the absorption of phosphorus and other soil elements as well as water. Mycorrhizae (sometimes wriften as mycorrhizae, singular, and mycorrhizas, plural) are active for months to a year. They are organs on most trees. Pruning The selective removal of woody plant parts of any size using saws, pruners, clippers or other pruning tools. Roots (absorbing) Absorbing tree roots are organs that absorlc free water and elements dissolved in it from the soil. Non-woody absorbing roots have very little lignin and no corky outer bark. Woody roots have lots of lignin and a corky outer bark. Non-woody roots do grow in winter in non-frozen soils, and may even grow in non-frozen soils below frozen soils. Also see root hairs and mycorrhizae which are associated with non-woody roots. Roots (woody) Woody tree roots are organs that support the tree mechanically, store energy reserves, transport free water and the substances dissolved in it and synthesis substances such as growth regulators, amino acids and vitamins that are essential for growth. They also hold water in the form of bound water. They also contain more lignin than non-woody roots. IJ I I r I I I I Byrdie Cumming, r.r. r..?ufion Plan A Cut Above Forestry Inc. 325 Forest Road Inspection Summary Page 14 tU212004 A Cut Above Forestry P.O.7133 Breckenridge,CO 8C/.24 453-9154 I I I I t I I I t t I I I I tnspection Development Stage II Date: Pre-construction Demolition/stripping I Inspector: Rough grading Street, utilities t Also present: Building construction I Fine-grading/landscaping Generalcomments: Other I Site Gonditions Tree # Conditions/concerns Treatments required I Recommendations and Follow-up I t t I T 1^ t I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lhryz:I:8all0z'/r''^[.z€rvilrdltulrrril\:l V TOI4A, Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2739 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all requrred information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request:G*t6pror u ReVlCa., oF A RECEIVLD rLtJ [j .j rijljlf Location of the Proposal: Lot: lB Block: Subdivision:VYL Physical Address:M ?oFf.st BD tl*tc , cQ parcef No.r 2lOt'O?t'tlOZ. (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) "15 zoni ng: Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailins Addressr a/O fr^ EfztSt<e: 326 W (zo*O VNL,cO.l4to5$ Phone: Owner(s) Signature(s): Mailing Addressl Fax: Type of Review and Fee: $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee tr New Construction D Addition D Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) n Minor Alteration (single-fa mily/duplex) ! Changes to Approved Plans I Separation Request $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review 8oard. No Fee Name of Applicant: E-mail Address: For Office Use Only: Fee Paid:Check No.: By: o Board ,r-ffi Design Review ACTION FORM Deparbnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 974.479.2739 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us ProjectName: DRISKOSEPERATIONREQUEST DRBNumber: DRB040035 Project DescripUon: CONCEFTUAL REVIEW OF A SEPERANON REQUEST Pafticipants: OWNER DRISKO FAMILY LP I 02/09/2004 Phone: c/o nM DRISKO 325 FOREST RD VAIL co 81657 License: APPLICANT DRISKO FAMILY LP I 02/09/2004 Phone: c/o nM DRrsKo 325 FOREST RD VAIL co 81657 License: Project Addrcss: 325 FOREST RD VAIL Location: 325 FOREST ROAD, VAIL, CO 81657 Legal Description: LoU 18 Block: 7 Subdivision: VAIL VILI-AGE FIUNG 1 Parcef Numberz 2LOIO7 IL3022 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACIION Action: WITHDRWN Conditions: Cond: 200 A conceptual review is NOT a Design Review Board approval. Planner: George Ruther Itign Review Action fr" TOWN OF VAIL Category Number Project Name:t€ Building Name: Project Descriplion: J \-eL)g t I Vs, rS qr<-[ ur[e owner, Addres"^naPnon ,l</ f /LI t(76 -@75 'o/,Lko 5 k /4(ad.o Dr", Vo,' ( (> g /€5 ArchitecvOontact, Address and Phone: 5 -( q_q / /6s Co Subdivision S:iq< Cit.+ €cl *+a', (q * c-or Legal Description:Lot J? Block 7 Project Street Address: Zone Districl +L" f "{-piii, a' t Staff Act i o n Motion by: Seconded by: Vote: slpprovar ,^rfc*--l)r'-4 - T[,,q ,#(, cqr-j "u\L/'../ ryd-n^t-b ! Disapproval *1,,e ta R- (4 L, ,+'L j-l"v -' , J :.', (e(Zc.utu rrrg yn{stcvretrOtu ;,J ! StafiApproval t) I Lzz{ r,t4 l tul t*, , t+ oiow*'J thQ Lqtg< eu?Qtrv<t'1 Conditions:co'r--/ f<rrc,Qq,rc, s',c{4 t\*,L t-t t'i,,uc{rbr^) , ivs i6X"n'o @G/9 DRB Fee ere-oaia f &CO .e ;/ 2[a'[+a /@ a,v\. & c,r,.,,'i fl*,Czo ri' Ltw ( ( @,1,a___*a *e[,*t * Ct:e (. *" i Ct MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Department of Community Development FII,E WP:r FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: February 12, 1996 A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow lor an expahsion to an existing residence and a variance to allow for a garage to be toiated in a front setbaak, in association witfr the construction of a new primary residence, located at 325 Forest Road/Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Steve Riden representing Tim Drisko Planner: Jim Curnutte I. DESCRIPTION OFTHE REOUESTS The applicant, Tim Drisko, is reguesting Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) review and aiiroval ot a250 addition to an existing residence and a front setback variance associated wirh th6 construction of a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing, 325 Forest Road. The existing dwelling unit on the property has been in existence since the early 1960's and therefore, is eligible to apply for a 250 addition. The applicant intends to remodel the existing dwelling unit in such a way that the final amount of GRFA in the building does not exceed 40% of ihe maximum amount of GRFA allowed on the property, thereby allowing the unit to be considered the "secondary" unit. lt is then, the applicant's desire to construct a new "primary" dwelling unit on the western portion of the property. Additionally, the applicant wishes to utilize the GRFA currently locaied under the existing two-car garage on the remainder of the site and therefore, intends to infill this area to remove it from consideration as GRFA. The 250 addition and the variance requests are further described as follows: 250 Addition - The existing dwelling unit on Lot 18 is 2,857 sq. ft. in size. As mentioned above, it is the applicant's desire to remodel this dwelling unit in such a way that it will be considered the secondary unit on the property. This reclassification of the building will allow for the construction of a new prirnary dwelling unit to be built on the western portion of the property. According to the Primary/Secondary Zone District requirements, the secondary dwelling unit on this property cannot exceed 2,248 sq. tl. (40% of total allowed GRFA). lf the 250 addition is approved by the Planning Commission, this dwelling unit may have a total GRFA of 2,498 sq. ft. In order to comply with this maximum GRFA figure, it is necessary to remove some portions of the existing building from consideration. as enfR. The applicant will accomplish this by removing the mudroom on the lower level of the building and converting this area to outdoor patio space and by converting an existing bedroom on the second level into the new entry deck area. When remodeled, the total GRFA of the residence will be 2,473 sq. ft. f :W€ryoEc\Fc\mar6ulisko2 I 2 Variance Request - The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a two-car garage to association with the new primary dwelling unit. The garage is proposed ' into the front yard setback. As indicated on the attached site plan' the is to be located within 6" of the front property line and accessed from d[sf uii a nlateO driveway, currently designed at a grade of 1 1.5ol". In justification for the proposed front yard setback variance, the applicant's architect has stated that: the extreme steepness of the approach to the setback, efforts to save some very large trees and thb narrowness of he remaining parcel to be developld, has limited solutions appropriate in resolving the specific design issues. The proposal will be limited to the solution shown, othenrvise, a very expensive and potentially inoperative and possibly massive structure would be required just to allow access to the site. The design criteria solution that I am suggesting will also keep the new residence from encroaching upon the views of the adjacent properties, by maintaining an open space on the north portion of the site." II. BACKGROUND On September 8, 1986, the PEG reviewed and approved a front yard setback variance request to allow for the construction of a new two-story, two-car garage in the front and side setback areas of Lot 18. The approved variance allowed the garage to encroach f into the 15' side yard setback and 10' into the 20' front yard setback. The PEC felt that here were physical hardships on the site that necessitated approval of the setback variances and recognized that the approval would be consistent with previously approved variances along Forest Road. The PEC approved the variance unanimously, by a vote of 6-0. Due to construction errors, the building was constructed further into the side yard setback than originally approved by the PEC and on April 20, 1987, a second variance was granted lor the garage. This variance allowed the already constructed garage to encroach 12-112'inlo the side yard setback. This modification to the previously approved variance was also unanimously approved by the PEC by a vote of 5-0. On July 26, 1993, the applicant submitted an application lor setback and site coverage variances for a project very similar to the one being proposed today. The application presented at the time showed a minimal connection between the new building and the existing dwelling unit. However, since the applicant felt that this was not the best design solution for the property, the variance requests were withdrawn. On August 16, 1995, the Design Review Board approved a separation request, to allow the proposed primary unit to be detached from the existing dwelling unit. The Design Review Board based their separation approval on the preservation of mature evergreen trees, significant slope constraints and the interior lay-out of the existing building. on January 22, 1996, the PEC held a worksession to discuss issues related to this application. The items discussed at that worksession included the proposed location of the primary unit garage access, the removal of GRFA under the existing two-car garage and the proposed maximizing of many of the properties development standards. The PEC discussed the pros and cons associated with accessing the primary unit garage direcfly off of Forest Road, as opposed to side loaded from a heated driveway. The PEC felt that the applicanfs proposed design proMded a more aesthetically pleasing building, as well as greater opportunity for landscape screening and additional on-site parking and vehicular maneuvering area. With regard to the proposed removal of GRFA under the existing garage, the PEC had suggestions as to how the structure might be modified to accommodate the fill necessary to remove the GRFA. The PEC also suggested that he applicant eplore a way to create an EHU in this area. Lastly, the PEC f:EveryoDo\p.c\um6urisko2l 2 I recommended to the applicant that since he was proposing to locate the primary unit garage on the front property line, idaximize the GRFA on the property, build to the maximum building height' ieUining wait height and driveway grade, that he consider reducing these maximums slightly, in order tdallow for-errors which may occur during the projects constructi6n. ItI. ZONING ANALYSIS Zoning: Primary / Secondary 0.598 acres / 23,078 sq. tt. AI{rwed/BeouirqEl 3,427 sq. ft.- 3g* 72141', 62 2,110 sq. tl.(g.17.) 20,100 sq. ft. (87%) 3 spaces prcvided ' Thla lQurc lndudG t zlio tqurt toot lllowlnce, rubiecl to lPplovrl by lhc PEC.* Thlg lliur. Includ€ aStZ si. tt. ot Cnm ln the edatiirg drvcllng unlt lnd lpp]o:dmrl.ly 5?0 3q. lt ol GRFA locriod on the fta levc ol the two"car gst ge stuclute. Th.ce flgures hprcenlihe sotback lor th. eldstlng re.ldence. They do nol Include the eelback v.danc€ whlch wee grrnt d lor tho eldetlng twecar grrrge and were e:phln d ln more deLll h lhe brd(gtound ..ctlon ol lhlr momoondr. IV. CRTTER|A AND FINDINGS Variance Criteria and Findings Upon review of the Criteria and Findings outlined in Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested setback variance based .upon the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potendal uses and structures In the vicanity. Although the two-car garage lbr the primary unit is proposed to be located within 6" of the front property line, thetop of this garage will be approximately 9' below the pavement of Forest Road. Due to this drop in grade and the substantial landscaping proposed on the tront and western side of the property, statt believes that the impact associated with this variance request is minimal. Additionally, allowing the applicant to place a tairly significant portion of the building within the front setback area will help keep he entire structure as far south on the property as possible. This building placement will have significant visual benelits to the property owner immediately to the west. Lot Area: Building fbight: 3s n. GRFA: 5,658 sq. fl. ' Setbacks:Frcnt: 20 ft. Sid€s: 15' tt,^ 5 fi. R6ar: 15 ft. Site Covereg€: 1 ,616 sq. ft.(A)/d Landscaping: t3,8a7 sq. ft. (60ry') Pa*ing: 6 spaces requitEd Exigino Prooeed 29 ft. (existing building) 33 fl. (new building) 5,658 sq. tl. 15'19!|' Sril' 4,097 sq. ft. (17.7%) 1s,400 sq. fi. (e6.7"/.) 7 spaces f :\sveryo$pec\ff rosudrto2l 2 B. i 2. The degree to which rellsl from the strict and llteral interpretatlon and etfforcement of a specffied regulation is necessary to achieve compatlbality and unlformity of treatment ambng sites in the vlcinlty or to attain th3 obiectlvee of this title without grant of special privilege. The strict and literal enforcement of the 2O fiont setback would push the garage back 20 from the tront property line. Although GRFA could be located on top of this garage, staff believes that domplying wifi the seback requirement would cause portions of the structure to be located nrrttiei nortn on ilre property. The request, as proposed, is taking advantage of a flat bench on the property which was created in the past in order to provide access down to a garage located immediately adjacent to the existing dwelling unit. Keeping the proposeO primary unit on the flat bench will have substantially less site impacts'to the property and, as mentioned previously, will reduce visual impacts to the neighbor immediately to the west. Additionally, the Town has historically been very supportive of garage variance requests in the front siflcact< along Forest Road, due to the nature of the existing road alignments and topographical constraints in the neighborhood. To approve this request would be consistent with previously approved variances and would not be a grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the requestsd variance on light and air, dbtribution of population, transportadon and traffic iacillties, public facilities and utllities, and public salsty. The proposed garage addition will not have a negative effect on the above rnentioned criteria. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the tollowing tindings before granting a variance: 1. 2. 3. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. That the granting of he variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpreiation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that doe not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. I:\e./.ryolcgec\srdculitto212 250Addition Criteria and Findings Upon review of Chapter 18.71 - Additional GRFA, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the request for Additional GRFA based upon the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors: Before acting on an application for additional GRFA, ilre Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Effect upon the existing topography, vegetation, dainage and existing structures. The existing dwelling unit is being remodeled in such a way that portions of the building are actually being removed so that the final size of the building does not exceed 4c,/o ol the total GRFA allowed on the lot, plus 250 square feet. The changes to the existing residence include a new walkway and bridge on the south side of the building. This walkway will allow the main enry to the building to be relocated from its current location on the lower level, to the second level of the building. ln addition to the bridge, the new entry feature will include a covered entry and deck. This new open deck area will replace an existing bedroom and bathroom. On the first level of the building, a portion of the existing mudroom will be converted to outdoor patio area. Staff believes that the proposed remodel will have minimal impact on the site's topography, vegetation, and drainage. Although four evergreen trees will be removed to make way for the new access to he existing buiUing, including one large evergreen tree which will be relocated to an area north of the existing garage, these impacts cannot be directy attributed to the 250 portion of the remodel. Staff believes that the proposed landscape plan adequately compensates forthe loss ofthese trees. 2. lmpact on adjacent properties. Statf believes that the proposed 250 addition to the existing residence will not have a negative impact on adjacent properties. As mentioned previously, although this dwelling unit is proposing to fully utilize its 250 allowance, the building.is actually being reduced in size in order to make it the 'secondary" unit on the property. 3, Gompliance with the Town's zoning requirements and applicable development standards. Section 18.71.020 (F) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code requires that any dwelling unit that proposes to use Additional GRFA shall comply with the standards outlined in the Town of Vail Design Review Guidelines. These standards include landscaping, undergrounding ol utilities, driveway paving and general maintenance of the property. Upon inspection by statf, we feel that this property is in compliance with the Town's zoning requirements and all applicable development standards. Additionally, statf believes that the landscape plan, proposed in conjunction with the redevelopment of this property, will actually be an improvement over what currently exists. fl weryole\peo\ErlosuriEto J 12 t f B. Findings: The planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting approval for Additional GRFA: 1. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively effect existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures' 2. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively impact adjacent ProPerties. g. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would comply Wlth all Town zoning requirements and applicable development standards. V. STAFF RECOIIIIENDATION The Community Development Department staff recommends apprcnal of fris application for a front yard setback variande and additional GRFA. Staff believes that the Review Criteria have been met, as discussed in the memorandum. With regard to the variance Findings, staff believes that Finding B.1 is met and that the approval of the requestled variance, in order to locate a garage in the lront setback, is consistent with prwious approvals alohg Forest Road and would not constitute a grant ot special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on othei properties classified in the same zone district. Finding B.2 is met, in staff's opinion, since the propobeO'variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to lroierties or improvements in the Mcinity and Finding 8.3 (a,b &c) is met in that there are extaordinary biriumsnnces and conditions applicable to this lot that are not indicative of the majority of lots in the Primary/Secondary Zone Disfict (ie. extremely steep slopes off of he road in front of the property, as well as very steep slopes along the middle section ot the property). with regard to the Additional GRFA Findings, staff believes hat Finding 8.1 is met as he proposed remodel of the existing dwelling unit minimally impacts the existing site. Finding 8.2 is met, in staff's opinion, as the proposed remodel will not negatively impact adjacent properties. Finding 8.3 is met, in siaff's opinion, as lhe proposed remodel complies with all zoning requirements and applicablg development .standards. Staff recommends approval of tre requested variance and 250 addition with the following conditions: 1 . Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the property, the applicant will provide stamped Engineered drawings indicating how the existing two-story garage can be structurally altered to allow for the infill of the area on the lower level that is currently existing GRFA. 2. The applicant will obtain statf approval of the site and landscape plans prior to DRB review of this application. f teveryonets€cvnsmos\drisco 2'l 2 t r ''\loo .$ figjl ?u -. ,1 l$l! /*:/ l\( l'\\it '\ ,\\ r c|-r \S i I .. i'',) e{- -a It t, \I \j [9',iN \ *t irS I s.))il it*kt",' JI t- \l 9j _rN .r' _$ $il i\il ,l il lr ll tl /t ,i \,.i I i I r\' :1 2.]tl .( ,1 \i i,'ln \i\ l (E {u' #\ .l \:'l,l tl ,) \ \ I _.+ \--,-{r.Y \r. , (\ -t --l \ I \ +s {.r d{ t:IJ !:- ilp l I I I i i -:' ct ^ \----= ' \ \_---:' \ --T-f . I I i- \ F p rI',r Itr ll, t--r E\- il I t Yt,'i I l'i li rl I i! !t \\t, t . \ ,l ( i .l II lt * I -l I I I I I I --l ot H $l xll *l ,Tl $l -.-. _f I . t'r.i-f tt, 1, I I I I --!I I I - -.T I I I $ I I {l \l 4t $l I r $l l) r[ |Itl F{+l .j : i fl 'r(rl ,nrl \l ;'l l I lt \ $ I i ' I I i ,'' '1: .t 1 '"!; .i, .t i .t .i il '.4 it t /\i ':i ', 'j ,|!. I .\,i 1 I t oNl,lu ItIu .toyTIlA ,tlv^ ..f TtC .3t tOl o(IYlloloc ',IIv,|cyor rsiruo{ Sz€#iiliiiiiir iiiiriii e : I ot z rt tr c q J lrl 1{ ..1 z = li 'tovTIt twJ\ 'l 'TL 'tt l^tl ocYforoo ',I!YA qYor rsiruor Sz{ cn z -l A a o (, 1.. il ||| d rl c 14 C.!.p z t. c 8 rl |l. rI Lt td .l Ji I|ar >.oi l|: 'w-l pi, ,i6 r'i il r )$$ : '! .rl .:. It I i rl .{ 'ri i ::l I t i ') F' I \-l -t- | -l * a (l \r \\I \f I z (\ :T li'l irl I dt A D 7 N t' .i ..:, .t .:t :' Lt ,it I o ry)aqjr:oF1 U$tT fwf@ r-ffiP. L-6.8- 5 e c @E-4Art- -Q tr, .' f-* @; r' ,ta,n LeuPL Phn dD 4r AJ@ 5-o r\eq * t t-<O /tl t THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on February 12,1996,at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: A request for a Major Amendment to SDD No. 32 to allow for the construction of an Employee Housing unit located at The Cornice Building, 362 Vail Valley DriveiPart of Tract B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: David Smith Planner: George Ruther An Amendment to the Zoning Code, Medium-Density Multi-Family District, adding a provision limiting the density to eighteen dwelling units per acre of buildable site area. This provision was inadvertently omitted from Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1991. Applicant: Town of Vail Gommunity Development Department Planner: Dominic Mauriello A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion to an existing single family residence located at2299 Chamonix Lane/Lot 7, Block A, Vail Das Schone Filing #1. Applicant: Frank D. D'Alessio Planner: George Ruther A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion to the secondary residence located at 275 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 40, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Steve Berkowitz Planner: Randy Stouder A request for a Minor SDD Amendment to allow for changes to the development plan located at Millrace Phase 3, 1335 Westhaven Drive/Development Area A of the Glen Lyon SDD (SDD No. 4). Applicant: Steve Riden representing Gregory Walton Planner: Jim Curnutte A request for an interior residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an interior storage area, located at 1881 Lionsridge Loop #25llot 1, Block 3, Lionsridge 2nd Filing. Applicant: Matt King Planner: Lauren Waterton A request for a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow for an expansion to an existing unit and a front yard variance to allow for a garage to be located in a front setback in association with the construction of a new Primary residence located at 325 Forest Road/Lot 18, "Block 7, VailVillage 1st Filing. pplicant:Steve Riden representing Tim Drisko Jim Curnutte anner: Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2114 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. Community Development Department Published January 26, 1996 in the Vail Trail. Ioh & lvfary WitteoYer P.O. Box lzl40 Boulder, CO 80303 Peter Tufo 164 Elst 72nd Street - NewYorh l.fY 10021 et WalterHossnan P.O.Box2?2l LittleRock, ARK 72203 Byron Williams Route 2, Bsx375-7 Buckhanno4 WV 262OL WilliamBroum 575I{apeRoad Hillsborough, CA94010 The Cousins ofVail c/oJackman S. VodraY P.O. Box 60 Eas Liverpool, MN 43920 Glen Oak Investment, Inc. 78 The Bridge Path Ontario, Canada M3B\I/B 1 PeterKalhrs c/o Lamar Companies 365 South Street Monistovrq NI07960 (eijd€A'.7.|'\L1+t . OPPENHEIMER Jui glnlulTE Totm Plannor TO: MIKE MoGEE PRO.IECT: DATE SUBMITTED: COII,MENTS NEEDED BY: Englnoorlng: Landscaplng: Rovlewed by: Comments: Flre DepL: Revlewed by: 3as EfiF.g6 ,l #rcq BLIC H BRIEFDESCRIPTTON FTHEPROPOSAL: A&,4' E/S + useeletr.l -- I )o tt) <'-€-o aLat)(VScaIerX.( --gLs'c{e Pcc,o fv,"dl 6gc4s1 *'A8a6-cl t;) f<9F^Et _Y.@ Zi;"tg @r.s bc€oee-TG;.{#"M' ;;iZ7- t, lY u ro tt s c@A4r',rd :? Revlerred by: --a*' Mq"*-^: Date: i ru 'r.r' Comments: i:r^\.f \'crr\ ,+)( c.r<-i'ivr\' (-!c^{\k\(- <Yr'-r rcrS "c"S-'---\ ft ,\r<r'}J-'-1'{-\c{)s- <*r'IA't \Z'7'' ' '+ \ 6or-y12. .)ccr4Nrc\ ar' (ztd() Z \ ) erejr'*- s:z Ces ' fteuz Pr;e lito to? d \lc \t!:'(1 c{ L\\ I t'-br'Ag(tsJ€g ' I L?KE g€<|Js\(\ if ' Dpte: '. Date: 'l'Ar t MIKE MoGEE' lriqi'F G HALL hOOO OPPENHEIMER 'i;t{tj$ti'!f'}bd ,_Jrr cutsl/rrB,. Toirn Plannor Betum to l*#[kr, vvtt /l{rqkf ueaa.$ A RSccs h a ?yts*rp7 'v Flro Dept: ',P 19C{ . r*rt-,*l 9ar:'o'\qAS crsq.rwr\ ol"r s fif-g F E E E E{ta F t TE _t 4' ft it6 Ei E F !t g |E TOWNOFVAIL DEPART]\I El-T OF Cov]|l Ln*lTt' DE\TLOPI| E-\T PROI.'ECT t-r tt|-. | 'r r-. f '---' t-' I t-- Fli=ceIianelu-=: f,r=h i1i - -+--':ri' r'lL;1;;:1 + L':rl. l.:11 Fl:i: -'!,-rr: i. * l-t': lH 1 j r"j l:,F: r !;t':il' L]HF I i1l ir;:[ llitir,:,i_,r' I t !1t :'.i+;-E!:l I lerri P=id I I if ili:1[1ii I lf' I llLil:1 'l'l r-rrllrJi:11 i l:,itjtltiLl ruFjiuSlb"NA6'E FeE .-TSl r .- :1.1, i. frF F: 5;:i; *-' -r r-r . r:rr-{ Erric,un t E:id ll t i F lr f E t}-Ao.fi() n)At VTC ART PROJECT DONAT]ON OI 0000 413.PRE PAID DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEE TLTiJ OO --or1t000 423 7 I INVESTIGATION FEE (BUILDING) 3l 0000 451l0 TOV PARKING FUND 0l ooo0 22027 TOVNEWEW S PA P FR D I S P EN S E R F U ND * 0l 0000 2lll2 TAXABLE @ JOlo (STATE) at 0000 41010 AXABLE @ 4% fiOWN) ol 0000 4237r BUILDING INVESTIGATION ITHER _ol 00oo 41339)TDDITIONAL GRFA "250"s200.00 l-'LcL1, 0l 0000 41330 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT s200.00 ol 0000 4r 330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION ILESS T}IAN IOO SQ.FT.I $200.00 ot 0000 4 1330 EXTERIOR ALTERATION IMORF- TIIAN IOO SQ.FT.]s500.00 =0l 0000 4r330 SPECIAL DE\/ELOPMENTDISTRICT [NEW]5 I,500.00 0t 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAJOR AMEND $ I,000.00 ol 0000 41330 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MINOR AMEND s200.00 -ot Q9004_Dt8 SUBDIVISION r0t 00004t330 VAzuANCE s250.0u\LT),L\O ol 0000 4 r 330 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS s250.00 ol 0000 4lll0 RE - ZONING s200.00 CTHE,R OTHER ITOTAL: (r50,c10 Colitl, ENTS: cAsE r- t,*.0 tI51 2-: u. o tt REC. BY: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Department of Community Development January 22, 1996 A request for a worksession to discuss a residential addition, utilizing the 250 Ordinance, to allow lor an expansion to an existing unit and a front yard setback variance to allow for a garage to be located in a front setback in association with the construction of a new primary residence located at 325 Forest Road/Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Sleve Riden representing Tim Drisco Planner: Jim Curnutte I. DESCRIPTION OFTHE REQUEST The applicanl, Tim Drisco, has requested a worksession with the Planning and Environmental Commission for the purpose of discussing issues related to his proposed request for a 250 addition to an existing residence and a front setback variance associated with the construction of a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing, 325 Forest Road. The existing dwelling unit on the property has been in exislence since the early 'l 960's and therefore, is eligible to apply for a 250 addition. The applicant intends to remodel this dwelling unit in such a way that the final amount of GRFA does not exceed 4O/" al the maximum amount of GRFA allowed on the properly, thereby allowing the unii to be considefed the "secondary' unit. lt is then, the applicant's desire to construct a new "primary" dwelling unit on the western portion of the property. The applicant has requested a variance to allow a two-car garage, associated with the new primary dwelling unit, to encroach 20' into the front yard setback. As indicated on the attached site plan, the garage is proposed to be located on the front property line and accessed from the east via a heated driveway, currently designed at a grade ot 12/". ln justification for the proposed front yard setback variance, the applicants architect has stated that: "the extreme steepness of the approach to the setback, efforts to save some very large trees and the narrowness of the remaining parcel to be developed, has limited solutions appropriate in resolving the specific design issues. The proposal will be limited to the solution shown, otherwise, a very expensive and potentially inoperative and possibly massive structure would be required just to allow access to the site. The design criteria solution that I am suggesting will also keep the new residence from encroaching upon the views of the adjacent properties, by maintaining an open space on the north portion of the site." II. BACKGROUND On September 8, 1986, the PEC reviewed and approved a front yard setback variance request to allow for the construction o{ a new two-story, two-car garage in the front and side setback areas 0f Lot 18. The approved variance allowed the garage to encroach g' into the 15' side yard setback and 10' into the 20' trcnt yard setback. The PEC felt that there were physical hardships oo on the site that necessitated approval of the setback variances and recognized that the aprproval would be consistent with previously approved variances along Forest Road. The PEC approved the variance unanimously, by a vote of 6-0. Due to construction errors, the building was constructed turther into the side yard setback than originally approved by the PEG and on April 20, 1987, a second variance was granted for the garage. This variance allowed the already constructed garage to encroach 12-112'into the side yard setback. This modification to the preMously approved variance was also unanimously approved by the PEC by a vote of 5-0. On July 26, 1993, the applicant submitted an application lor setback and site coverage variances for a project very similar to the one being proposed today. The application presented at the time , showed a minimal connection between the new building and the existing dwelling unit. However, since the applicant felt that this was not the best design solution for the property, the variance requests were withdrawn. On August 16, 1995, the Design Review Board approved a separation request, to allow the proposed primary unit to be detached from the existing dwelling unit. The Design Review Board based their separation approval on the preservation of mature evergreen trees, significant slope constraints and the interior lay-out of the existing building. III. CR]TERIA AND FINDINGS Since this is worksession, the Criteria and Findings for reviewing the variance and the .250" applications will not be specifically addressed, however, staff felt that it would be helpful to list them in this memorandum for the PEC'S review: Variance Griteria and Findings A. Consideration of Factors: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement . ot a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. 3. The etfect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public tacitities and utilities, and public safety. B. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: 1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of specialprivilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: (r A. a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that doe not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 250Addifion Criteria and Findinos Consideration of Factors; Before acting on an application for additional GRFA, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. Effect upon the existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures. 2. lmpact on adjacent properties. 3. Compliance with the Town's zoning requirements and applicable development standards. B. Findings: The Planning and Environmental Gommission shall make the following findings before granting approval for Additional GRFA: 1. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively effect existing topography, vegetation, drainage and existing structures. 2. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would not negatively impact adjacent properties. 3. That the granting of the requested Additional GRFA would comply with all Town zoning requirements and applicable development standards. rv. DtscusstoN tssuEs Since this is a worksession, there is no formal staff recommendation at this time. However. the staff has identified the following issues which we would like to discuss further with the PEC and the applicant: 1. Proposed location of garage access - Although staff believes that the site exhibits the physical constraints necessary to allow the PEC to approve a front yard setback variance, we are concerned about the design of the proposed access to the garage. As indicated on the attached site plan, the garage slab is located I feet below Forest Road. The garage doors are oriented toward the east. Access to the garage is provided via a heated driveway, which is designed at a 12o/" etad}. The driveway connects with Forest Road near the center portion of the lot. The applicant has indicated that a tront yard setback variance, to allow the garage to be iocated as far south on the lot as possible, helps reduce site impacts on the northern portion of the lot by preserving large evergreen trees and reducing site disturbance associated with the steep grades in that area. Although staff agrees that site irnpacts would be lessened by encouraging development to occur on the previously disturbed, and flatter, southern portion of the lot, those advantages may be ohset by the chosen design of the access way to the garage. Statf believes that the site disturbance (removal of vegetation, retaining walls, and re- grading) associated with the proposed driveway may be more significant than necessary to provide access to the garage Staff believes that site disturbance may be reduced by exploring the possibility of t elevating the garage in order to allow it to be accessed direcily from Forest Road, similar to the garage on the eastern portion of the site. This development scenario has both pros and cons associated with it. Statl has considered these pros and cons and has identilied hem in bullet form as follows: Pros - Reduced site disturbance, (less regrading and fewer retaining walls). - Reduced impact on existing vegetation. - Opportunity to locate GRFA underneath the garage, thereby reducing the overall footprint of the main building and reducing sile disturbance. Reduction of 12/" grade for driveway. Cons - lmpacts to building architecture. The garage doors would be directly facing Forest Road. - Reduced parking area on-site, (two in garage and two in right-oFway)' - Vehicles backing out onto Forest Road. 2. Removal of GRFA under the existing garage - As mentioned in the Background section of this memorandum, a front and side setback variance was granted in 1 986, to allow a two-story garage to be constructed on Lot 18. The upper level of this garage is used for parking cars and the lower level is existing GRFA, used for storage purposes. Since the applicant would like to utilize all of the property's available GRFA within the two dwelling units, he is proposing to convert the lower level of the building into crawlspace and transfer the existing GRFA to other areas of the property. Due to the amount of fill needed to convert this area into crawlspace, staft is concerned with whether the structural integrity of the existing exterior walls will allow for fiis conversion of GRFA to crawlspace. Since the entire redevelopment project is predicated on having this GRFA available, it would seem appropriate to determine the feasibility of infilling the lower level of the building, prior to allowing construction to begin on the property, and possibly prior to authorizing the 250 and variance requests. Should the applicant provide a professional engineer's analysis of fie ability to infill this level of the building before the 250 and variance applications are acted upon by the PEC? T 3. Proposal to locate the garage on the front property line and construct the driveway at lhe maximum allowed grade - Recently, the Town has received a number of variance applications requesting relief from the Town's requirements tor building height, setbacks, retaining wall heights and driveway grades in response to "errors" that have occurred during construction. As currently designed, the proposed tvyo-car garage, associated with the new primary unit, is located right on the front property line. Additionally, the driveway has been designed at the maximum 12h grade. Staff would recommend that the PEC consider asking the applicant to move the building away from the front property line a minimum of 6- 12" in order to allow for possible construclion errors. Also, upon discussing the most appropriate means of accessing the garage, if it is determined that the garage access is acceptable as currently proposed, staff would recommend that the garage slab be raised a minimum of 1-2' in order to reduce the driveway grade. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Since this is a worksession, staff will not be providing a recommendation to the PEC related lo the proposed 250 addition and front yard setback variances. Staff requests that the PEC provide direction to the applicant, so that a final decision on this application may be made at the February 12, 1996 PEC meeting. f :\everyone\psc\memos\drisco..l 22 I {\'l .tt,' /!): -'\,,, ',,'t$'t.."{t .d\ t I : ';' s{ !$_.r ':1 tr (d p /, 'tr L 1- -- ! '(lt (c ([i. -t 'i) Xoll *:r I lrn I $\ t .' i l l i .: : .i I ! t ll ::i :l i.! I li"w s ti -i:1-i- e $$ }?tq-inl (t \\ \\ a ,'4 EI rlt Er ts z T \. t U .\ )I tll -t .\-\ - -fr-{-'i \ )t \ ,, \\ \\ \ I -f' \ \ I I I I -+- \ t--''' -''' \ I xi l I ! I lit !l t,-F I -'o- q il lI\ i\ 1 \l T I: i I (/ ri 1! i, .!t' rl 'J :j- {i ri \i \1 \; I' i; ti ,i\ \\ I-fl x 4 I I t I I t- l --.f- I I I I I I rI 0 {T O .i l, ;.. t \{l q s Itr t t i I Ir l; li it 'r( i\ it d 'i \ l: :: /--o I J I I >.. l{ II s,\ \ It ll I I F 6t llll'i]il i;ifilli o o jesT J-L6wW +"{"C =A iAe' -+-j ,1-),%,2 54A€ _.aJ ? -e7-rQ LltFi . -: / ,/ .-* ../ o o /l t ,- ,'-,Q -l ywt aN (tt\rr+ Lf fr I l, -" Lods*1t0'f h,, lt<tgf \, gc@d M{qirg,ptCCS /-rruOu e,. Sler"'1, @! ., / , ,yEErSiL+'*v'l- i, t' DHb FK I e)fo',rV*T/6A*a tlf lTtt) l(ll t. flclE0D Denver Soles 0ffke 5600 South Ouebec Streel, Suite 2508 Inglewood, Colorodo 80ll I Phone 303./i0.6262 ^ tAX 303./70.6324 Job Number Job I'lome By Iechnicol Reoresenlotive Dote ZONE CHECK .FoR ._---=--- S ing 1 e Fami ly nes i aence, oupr e(i- rr imary/ S econaar)-)-zorie- -nrs-r-frcrj- DATE: ADDRESS:33 OWNER Site Coverage LandscaPing netaining WalI lleights narking Garage Credit \----?Drive: waLer course seLback qqq- 1la / I'EGAL, DESCRIPTION:_.jfr ntoc division l' "', L i i"(kfP Jst' PHONE PITONE zo'p pistorr* F/ 5 ' ,,oz - ' t't /.+ PRoPosED trsE P/ 3 ,\[ 'i' r- 'o ( i r,or srzE tri)18 qc,,ef 23 07#+BUTIDABLE Lori'anse t p/4 Allowed Existinq ProPosed Total '-) *i {-a ./ <-- / +-.-t.--'--. \HeighL staJcr' + / r t,'.l,-, -2\la9 l-? t I 3ro.o, .*o Ll,:-t;:;,' *;i, *,: iLtoa Zrq, ?16 I ? W primary GRFA a13S + 425 ,6 3 ltf 3 71113 secondary cRFA lrgi'- nr, =4& ?{'rt:i:... 'l ". ! SeLbacks FronL 2gt't'i t i O -a Sides 15' , %;^.,Rear 15' -Oe'- - a'- t..-f -__, "_') t 3 f.<) - -1:-' ., 't' 2,tto W3J :L)ffi+-ry 3f6 (3oo) (600) (soo)@ \ao? , / n Permittcd slope l3't Proposed slope , ---Eomplies with T.O.v' LighLins Ordinance Yes No \Po Pinish Grades Exceed 2:1 (50%) -7 EnvironmenLal/Hazards: 1) Flood Plain 3,/6', 4 neqra (30) (s0) 2l Perceng slope (< > 30t) 'U9 4) welIan a" t|'O View Corridor EncroactunenL: Yes *o ' { Daes Ehis regriesL invuive a 25it r\<iciiLir'rtr? =Y:=>- 7 - How much of Lhe allowed 250 Additl6i-is'useaTiLfi-ffiiircques n-re Frevious condiEions of approval (check properLy file): 5) te 4N 6 -{tncr YES NO- january 8, 1996 Ji-m Bryan Steve Ridden ArchitecLs Dr\p ataP VaiI, CO RE: Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Villerge, Firsl Filing Jim, Per' your request I have revieweC +"he lopography of Lot 18, Block 7, VaiI Vj1lage, First Filing. Irr comparing the Site PIan by l-lerberb E. Duncan Assoc:-ales A.I.A. Architect s dated 6-11-63 reviseC 7-8-63, atic our Topr,gr;-rphic Survey dated 4-2-90, it appears that in the northern 1r'3 area of ttre lot that is presumeCly undisturbed that the contour lines agree within accepted contour interval- toLerances- I cannot state what the original contours were on the rest of the lob as I have no knowledge or personal infornration on conditions of that date-Altfiough, after cor:ducting a visual ir:epection c,f the subject 1 -+ i - *.. ^-.i -.i -- |.L : -.r' : - - -:ontcurS E;hom-i on the Site PIan J-\J U t -Lli rJ (Jtl-|-llI\Jll . Ul_rg E;i\-J-DUIrrE \ dateci 6-1i-63 AtrtrJd be an represer:tatiorr of exioting conditions befor-e any marr-made grading was done.Dr^=-.- ^r'rr 'r ,,o,u have any queslions.vs,!! fr JLi v4-r!er v +Jr t Cul-olado P.L.S.26598 F;ro:,: \L= - Ierr G,rr rrc,rri no Tnn oFFtcE: 41 199 Hwy. 6 & 24 Eagle-Vail, CO 81620 MATLTNG: P.O. Box 1230 Edwards, CO 81632 PHcrlE: 3dt949-.,|406 FAX: /frlws-sso+ ?70 Commenls: P\<ri i- t'c'u.clc SPO-" e\eplt \L\\ al\c^( -)\\\L <t+\ 1\\"\u )e(\(\e {'l- TODD OPPENHEIMER Return to ..Jil CllRNllITE. Town Planner I U jJV\\-\\t dl-r Nl'r o\ pf'r1'.tLl P.e&ra (e'L'{nr l-- TO: MIKE McGEE GREG HALL Date: Dato: nrska - s;s fr,k*4 ,'A- bf tA 'trtftr, // Jsf DATE SUBMITTED: ta/ rt DATE OF PUBLIC HEARTNG Vq p, 8 n COMMENTS NEEDED gY: U€ C ]O BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: , I \ 1o hq h', (/ /oqk/ L 1<srfl€pc< - usJ"o,l A Y ! zScg3 Enginecring: trvr'r^- aw> ?,5:Jtr:l Yi i.:,Sx:;u i,':i.{ fi "5 "'o "<^t, c'r'cr'\ (rr6*4lrqrc1rs t cc' tdE$t'rr '-c -\\3 rt^-r\(i\"' <ri3 Vtricr $.,,o,r,e'.1 Tro+\.e et1e4a5 t1?o lh suin? : a c.\/11{n - 9l'1plt;t^. Fg.n.,ttsu frJ'lLolv'ra.'l F{r.,r ceri.,irt'l (-'/ r:efcur'r nt 1 w tit\'' ct-x-l c\\\ t..ifY\'r( p\\-\L) Landscaping: Fleviewed by: Commenls: Fire Dept.: Reviewed by; Comments: Distributcd to tho Fire Dopartmont, Public Works, and Landsca pinc on | 2 / lZ / q 5 v oo HALL GREG TODD OPPENHEIMER Return to JIII CURNUTTE Town Planner INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW BR EF. ?EScRlPto; or uL n f +'ns' r<,c,Uvs4t - fu:**- -j'r {C /,i"t*; ",t f{iit4ql rL f.+ c-f*-rilga J62*r-, r-.+ rrt{S cI 6) Cor-rl @ rue - 5;-{i € -''/-lcac['ut* Cu /t/ 'L f f t'l Qr@Ol C@/vt/''t Engincering: DATE SUBMITTED:DATE OF PUBLIG HEAfIING Reviewed by: Commenls: Landscaping: Reviewed by:Date: Comments: Fire Dopl.: Reviewed by: Comments: tr-ta 4fenue t -t 7-4./I t. I (,/ COMMENTSNEEDEDev: / / 17 Distributed to the Fire Deparlment, public Worls, and Landscaping oo TO: MIKE McGEE PROJECT: DATE SUBMITTED: 121 I I DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW Dr,isko - s;s 6iusl g.trtfrr,// Jsf GREG HALL Dale: Date: TODD OPPENHEIMER Return 1s ..JIM CIIRNIITIE. Town Planner BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: 1o L.a n t<Std,€Fc <- Lic*/oqk/ /- ucrbs A E( S<Ps Engineoring: Reviewed by: Comments: Reviewed by: Commcnts: Landscaping: Fire Dept.: r'4,'ria' "'i{it t+'' rVo<3h nn 2 ,/l r Reviewed ay, fr/crtog ou -\ty ge\_*x.n .I , flec\<-o1 r'ta-u\ - *o r^a-tnta-i"t Distributed to thc Fire Department, Pubtic Works, and Landsca ono * t =/ n f q 5 - FII E COPY D e p artment of Community D eve lopment TUTN OF 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2 t 3 V479-2 I 39 FAX 970-479-2452 December 22, 1995 Mr. Steven J. Riden P.O. Box 3238 Vail, CO 81658 RE: Redevelopment applications associated with Lot 18, Block 7. Vail Village I st Filing/325 Forcst Road. Dear Steve: Staff has completed a revieq' of your application to add tu'o "250's" to the abovc referenced lot and apply for a setback variance and has determined that yourapplications are incomplete. Please address rhc following ,{ r c (t , .. Although your covcr letter. rcceived in our officc on December I I . 1995. refers to a ' . '",rgAiotliQ setback variance for the proposed primary unit garage, no variance application has been provided for our rcvierv. Please submit this application with all required information. o Your application for additional GRFA was not signed by thc property o\\,'ner. Staff cannot t. accept applications that are not signed by the property o\\'ner. . Please pror,ide the stamped. addressed envelopes, and a separate list ofadditional property o\Ilners, as required in the "250" application. ' i .--. . On Au-eust 15, 1995, the Vail Tor',n Council amended the "250" chapter of the Vail ' Municipal code to preclude 250's to be used in conjunction rvith a derno/rebuild. Therefore, based on tlre information you have provided, it appears that you may only apply for one "2-50" addition on this property. Please call me for a more detailed explanation ofthe revised "250" ordinance. i o No DRB application fee lvas paid at the time you submitted yow applications as required I on page one of the application form. Plcase provide. o As required in the DRB application. pleasc providc floor plans of the existing residencc and earage. {S nnruoru"* t 2 v ,O . Please pror,'ide a new landscape plan that reflects all site improvements proposed rvith this project. The current landscape plan shorvs building additions, stairs, 'ul,alkn'ays, and retaining rvalls differently thau your site plan. Please explain the purpose ofproviding a third driveway to the property (accessing the top of the proposed primary unit garage). Please show the outline ofthe new secondary unit covered enffy on your floor plans. As you know, any roofcd area extending more than 4'from the building counts as site coverage. . Please explain rvhy the secondary unit floor plan dimensions (of each level) do not match when overlaid on a light table. o - Please explain why the site plan does not shorv all improvements associated with the secondar5' unit remodel including: - New entry deck aud stairs on rvest side of building. - Nerv patio on east side of new entry u'ay. - Removal of covered patio on rvest side of building' o Please provide elevation drawings of the east and u'est sides of the remodeled secondary unit. o It appears that your proposed primary unit exceeds the maximum building height alloq,ance in the primary/secondary zone district. Please lotver the highest ridge by approxirnately 1.5 feet. o Please amend y'our elevation drawings in order to: - Label your norlh and cast elevations correctly. - Reflect the two sarage windo',vs on the west elevation drarvings. - Drarv the stairs on the north side of the building the same u'ay on all drawings. - Mole the rvindoq' in the center of the building (rvest elev.) from the upper level to the middle level as indicated on tbe floor plans. o Please address the affached corrnents from the Vail Fire and Public Works Deparfinents, . Upon receipt of the above requested information, staff rvill conduct another review of the application and if determined to be cornplete will schedule your application for review by the PEC and DRB. Ifyou should have any questions please do not hesitate to contact nre at your convenience' Sincerelv".,-,/) -'/ -rt+--' ,14/1" L k/z1a,u {,U- U Jim Cumutte Senior Planner JC/jr cc: Tim Drisco EldE N .l A M E S --Posr oFFIcE Box 323 vAIL, CO. 816s8 .. (97O) 949-4r2r FAX 949-0304 Town of Vail Community Development 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 December 8, 1995 r0!.COIilt$.DEY.DEPT Re: Drisko: Primary/Secondary Project Statement: This proposal is for construction of a new primary Residence @ 325 Forest Road, Lot lg, Block 7, Vail Village, lst Filing. This includes application for 500 additional square feet to be applied to both the existing residence and the new residence. There is also a minor alteration to the existing residence and the existing gax4ge roof, to insure Architectural compatibility and coordination, without significant alteration to the existing structures, footprint or material finishes. The existing residence will become the secondary unit only, wheras both Primary and Secondary are presently encompassed with the existing unit. Due to severe site constraintg this proposal also includes a setback variance for the primary residence's garage. . MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. ltri.dma't Dato Dat€ ol DRB Moelhg Dato of PEC i,leotlng (ll nocoss8ry) APPLICATION FOF ADDITIOHAL GRFA {250) r. rY?E oF REOUEST Y Stendard 250 - TyPe I EHU 250 __ Type ll EHU 250 _ Typs V EHU 250 il. PFE-APPLTCATIONCONFERENCF A pro-appllcallon contoronco with A membor ot tho ptannlng statf ls strongty enmuragod lo discuss lho provlslons unde, whlch addttlonat GRFA can be edded to a stte. tt should bo undafstood thal thls odhancs doss not assuro oach propolty an addltional 250 Equaro loot of GRFA. Rathcr, lho ordinanca ellow8 tor uo to 250 soua.e leot lf tho condttlons sst torlh In Chptor 18.57 or Chapter 18.71 of hq Town ot Va codo are met. Appllcations lor additions undsr thls 6ocllon wlll not bo accoptod unloss lhey are cpmplete. Thb ihcludee all inlormaton requtrod on thls form a8 wal as Destgn R€vlo$r Board submlftal roqulromonts. III. APPLICATIONINFOFMATION A. PRO.JECTDESCRIPTION LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: feeE<f 325 Logal Descrhtlofl:Lor tB aros, J_ Firing /Ar- Vrr-r-<<-E (srFl,.-t .:< c.NAME OF APPLICANT: 41e a?e, o.3Z3b VAlt-. C., t3tc<t: edtrlr.*Zlh azaatu@& tAr<c'o,uw,W pnon /i- -----..- 6C?Eb E. F. nnnO fee @OO.Oo--i)r€quhed ar rime ot suumtrrir ofi standard 250. For a requost ttwotvhg an EHU, ihe tso is walved. /OA'o'l)// , ./q\-" /R/'" ' - ( /1,,14 Sqr The tollowlng lhls submltlal: In addtlon lo DRB subrnlltal roqulromonls, shall be requk€d wiih t. Veritication lhat thr unn ha recslvod a llnal og.Sflcale of occupancy. 2. Stampod, addrossod oruelopos and a soparalo llsi ot adlecent propedy owne6 ard ol owners ot unltg on tho same lol, This Infomatlon ls avallablg ftom tho Eaglo County AssosSOr'E offlce. 3, Condomhlum Assodatbn appro/al (lf applioablol. 1, Erlstlng or poposod lloor d6nB ol structuro. G. Your ptooosel wlll b6 revl€lr€d lo,r cornpllanc€ wlth Vall'e Corprohen$vo Phn. H. ll lhls application requiro8 a soparato rovlew by any local, Slato or Foderal eeoncy olhor than the Toivn of Vall, lhe appllcatlon foo shall bo Incroassd by $200.00. Ex8mples of suctr rovlo$r, may include, but aro not llmlted lo: Colorado Deparlmonl ol Hiohwey Accegg Pormlls, Army Corps ol Englneers 40t1, eto. Tho appllcanl 3hall bo .o0ponslbkt tor paylng any publlshing fees whlch are ln excloss ot 50% of lho appllcatlon fos. lf, at lh6 applicanl's request. any maller lc poslponed for hoarlng, cau8lng the matler to be ro-publlshod, lhon lttg ontlre foo for euch re -puulcalion shall be pald by the apdlcant Arplicauons doemed by lhe Communlty Doveloprnent Dopadment to havo sbnlflcar doslgn, land us€ or otller lssues whlch may have a elgnlllcant lmpacl on tho community may roquiro r€vle{v by Con&rltants ohor lhan lown slatt, Ghoutd a dol€rmlnatlon bo mde by lhe town staft ihal an outstde consultant ts needod lo rsylow any applicallon. the Communlty Develognont Dopartmont may hke an outoldo oonsultant, ll thall ostimate tho amounl ol mon€y noosssary b pay hlm or her and thls amounl shall be lorwardod to tho Town by th6 appllcent at tho tme he l es hig appllcatlon wllh ths Communlty Devolopmont Oopadmsnl. Upon compleUon ol ths reviow 0l tho appllcation by lho consullant, any ol the funds lorwarded by tho appllcant lor paymont of tha consuhant whlch have not been pald to ths consulhnt rhall bo relurned lo lhs appllcant. Expenses Incurred by the Town In excess of tho amount fonrarded by lhs apdicant shall be patd to tho Town by he appltcant rylthtn 30 days ot no llcatlon by the Town. .ed 9/4/9L DRB IPPLICATION - TOI{N OF VtrIL, DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED : DATE OF DRB MEETING : attttttttt TEIS .trPPLICATION IIII,L NOT BE ACCEPTED I]NTIL AIL REQUIRED INFORIRTION IS SI'BMITTED B. TYPE OF REVI EW: lv New Construction (9200.00) -oooraron (s50. oo) C. ADDRESS: Minor Alteration (S20.00) Conceptual Review (S0) D. LEGAL DEsCRrpTroN: LoE JB_ B]ock 7 subdivision YJAIU 'J IOT AREA: If regui red, slamped survey showing applicant must provide a current lot area . A{A J*Set FEE 5 20.00 s 50.00 s100.00 s200.00 s400.00 s500.00 PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION: YJAII- JWz lt'r- (tLttJ6 If property is described by a meets and bounds legal description, please provide on a separate sheet and aLtach t.o this applj.cation. *-1,- V 111 rt4 t H. F. NAHE OF Mail.ing APPLICANTl RESENTATIVE: Address: I.NAME OF OWNERS: SIGNATURE(S): iling Address: J. Condoninium Approval if applicable. K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shoHn above, are to be paid at,Lhe time of subnitta.l. of DRB appticalion. Later, Hhen applying for a building permit, please ident.ify the accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of VaiI will adjust the fee according t ensure the correct fee is paid. FEE SCHEDULE: VAIUATI ON s 0 - s 10,000 s 10,001 - s 50,000 5 50,001 - $ 150,000 s150,001 - s 500,000 5500.001 - s1,000,000 5 Over 51, 000, 000 r DESIGN REVIEI{ BOARD ATPROIIA! EXPIRES ONE YEAR AFTER FINA! ITPROVA! T'NLESS A BUILDING PERHIT IS ISST'ED A}ID CONSTRUCTIOIT IS STARTED. rTNO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED WITEOOT OWNER'S S I GNATI'RE NAJ''E OF APPLICANT: Ma i.Iing Address: II. PRE-AP;}ON MEETING: A pre-application meeting with a men!f,er of the planning staff is sLrongly encouraged to determine if any additional application informaEion is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment wiLh the sLaff to determine if there are additional submittal requirements. Please note that a CoMPLETE application will sLreamline the approval process for your projecL. III. ]MPORTANT NOTICE F€GARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A, In addition to meeting subnittal reguirements, the applicanl must stake and tape the project siLe to indicaLe property lines, building Iines and building corners. Al.I trees to be removed must be Laped, AII site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit., The applicant rnust ensure that sEaking done during the winter is not buried by sno',r. B. The revieH process for NEw BUILDINGS norrnally reguires two separale meetings of the Design Reviet{ Board: a concePtual. approval and a final aPProvaI. Applicants should plan on presenting their development proposal at a mininum of two meetings before obtaining final approvaL. C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting daLe and who have noL asked in advance lhaL discussion on their item be n.lqtn.lnp.l . will have their items removed from the DRB docket unLil such Lime as the item has been republ-ished. D. The folLowing items may, aL the discretion of the zoning adminisLrator, be approved by the Community Development Department staff (i.e. a formal hearing before the DRB may not be required) : a. windo'.rs, skylights and similar exterior changes uhich do not after the existing pfane of the bui Idlng; and b. Building addiEion proposals not visible from any oLher lot or public space. At Che time such a proposal is submitted, appficants must incLude IetLers from adjacenc property owners and/or from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association sEatinq the associaLion approves of the addiLion. E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow aval.anche, rockfall., flood plain' debris ffow' wetland, e!c), a hazard study musL be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard reporl prior to the issuance of a building Permit.Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Planner prior Lo DRB application to determine the relationship of the properLy Eo a]I maPped hazards. F. For aIl residenti.al construcLion: a. CIear1y indicate on Lhe floor plans the inside face of the exLerior structural walls of the building,'and b. Indicate Hith a dashed line on the site plan a four foot distance from the exterior face of the building HaILs or supPorting colutnns. G. If DRB approves the application with conditions or modificaiions, all conditj.ons of approval must be resolveci prior to Town issuance of a building permit ' Three copies of a recent a I icensed survevor, at on which the followinq 2- Lot area. Two fooL contou! inlervals unless the ParceI consists of 5 acres or more, in which case' 5' contour intervals may be accepted. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks rrith diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a point one foot above grade. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (Iarge boulders, intermittent sLrcams' eLc. ) . Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.)' centerline of sLream or creekr required creek or stream setback, 100-year flood plain and slopes of 40t or more, if applicable. Ties to existing benchmark, eithe! UsGs landmark or sewer invert. This information should be clearly stated on the survey so that all measurements are based on the same starting point. This is particularly imporLant for height measurements. See Po]icy on Survey Information, for more information regarding surveys. Locations of the folloering: a. Size and type of drainage culverLs, swales' etc. must be shown. b. Exact ]ocation of existing utility sources and propcsed service lines from their source to the structure. Utilities to include: Cable Tv Telephone 5. 6. Sewer liaLer ElecLric c. Show aII utility meter locations' including :nv nFdFqtal q t^ be focated on site or in the righE-of-Hay adjacenc to the site. Revocable permics from the Town of vail are required for improvements in the right-of-vray, d. Property lines - distances and bearings and a basis of bearing must be shown. e. ALI easements (Title report must also include exisring easement J. ocat ions ) Exist ing and finished grades. Provide spot elevations of the street, and a minimum of one spot elevation on either side of the lot, 25 feet out from the side properLy Iines. B.Site Plan Locations of the fol]oHing: a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site. b. Proposed driveways. Percent sLope and spot e.IevaL i ons rnust be shown. AlI existing improvements including structures, landscaped areas, service areas, sLorage areast waIks, driveways, off-street parking, loading areas, reLaining HaIls (rriLh top and bottorn of wall spot elevations), and other existing site improvemenL s . r' -*H:: ::':rii:r:::i ;r:l:: txt'*ire the specifications, sanpLes and other rnaterials (inc'i'..rding a mode]) if deemed necessary to determine whether a project HiIl comply Hith Design Guidefines. V. MINOR ALTERATTONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUTLDINGS. Photos or skeLches which clearly convey Lhe redevelopment.proposal and the ]ocaLion (sile plan) of the redevelopnent proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requiremenLs set forth above, provided a]] important specifications for the proposal including colors and maLeri.aLs to be used are submitted. VI. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMHERCIAL A. Original floor plans rrit.h alI specifications shown, B. Three sets of proposed f .l.oor plans L/8' = 1' or larger (I/4" = f is preferred) C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and proposed construcLion. Indicate roof ridge elevations Hj.th existing and proposed grades shovrn underneat.h. D. ElevaLions of proposed addiLion. E. Photos of lhe exisLing structure. F. specifications for aI] maLerials and color samples on maEerials lisr (attached) . At the request of the Zoning Adninistrator you may also be required to submit: c. A statement from each utiliLy verifying focation of service and availabiliLy. See attached utility location verificat ion form. H. A site inprovement survey, stamped by registered professional surveyor. I. A preliminary title reportf to verify ownership of property, which IisLs all easemenLs. VII. FINAL S]TE PLAN once a building permit has been issued, and construction is underway, and before the Building Department will schedule a framing j.nspection, two copies of an Improvement Location Certificate survey (ILC) stamped by a registered professional engineer musL be submitted. The following informa!ion must be provided on the lLC: A. Buj.l.ding location(s) Hith ties to proPerty corners, i . e . dist ances and angles . B. Building dinensions to the nearest tenth of a foot. c. At1 uLility service Iine as-builEs, showing Eype of materi-al used, and size and exact location of lines- D. Drainage as-builts , E. Easis of bearing to lie to section corner. F. AII property pins are to be either found or set and staLed on improvement survey, G. Al.J. easements. H. Building floor elevations and aII roof ridge elevations vrith exist j-ng and proposed grades shown under the ridge Iines. LIST OF MATERIALS NAME oF PRoJEcr , t7?tqk:o LEGAL DEScRrrrroH' lor@-elocx ? ,u"o@ F Furs L srREEr ADDRESS: 3?.6 @eEq g4>, DEscRlprroN oF pRorEcr: frzlttvA+l4 AE/wlotJ The follovring information is Review Board before a final A. BUILDING MATERIAI-S: Roof Siding OLher 9Jall MaLeri a.I s Fascia Soffi.ts t,lindovrs window Trim Doors Door Tr im Hand or Deck Rails Flues Ffashings Chimneys Trash Enc L osures Greenhouses Other required for submiEtal to the Design approval can be given: LANDSCAP ING : TYPE OF Name of Designer: Phone: COLOR PLANT MATER]ALS: PROPOSED TREES Botanical Name Common Name Ouantitv Sizei /6 $ 5o zL\ cn-. ArL) 4WEE 6_ro'-ru' t,:'ca5ePa€F|'.A'-]--to''tzl EXIST]}IG TREES TO BE REMOVED rlndicate caliper for deciduous trees. MinitnuT caliper-for ae.iouou= tt.es is Z inctes' Indicate height for coniferous :ilkil:' BoranicarName EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOL'ED r Indicate size j2 florr\rtl. GROUND COVERS s0D )!.Eu TYPE OF IRRI GAT I ON TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROI, of proposed shrubs. Tvpe I'linimum size of shrubs is Square Footaqe r*lvZ- eeass/t^>tl' R-c*:gg- ^,,1g c.LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please show the nurnber of fixlures anO toiatiois on a separaLe Iighting plan, Identify each fixlure from the lignting plan on the list belovl and provide the vrattage, height-abov6 ' grade and type of ]ight proposed. OTHER LAl.lD SCApE FEATURES (retaining walLs, fences, swimming Pool.s, eLc.) Please specify. Indi;ate heights of'retainini HaIIs. Maximum height of wllls within the front sethack i;J leet, Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property is 5 feet n DATE: <FDDE' '7.7a4,1 + IE LNELl\ /S ZONE DI STRICTS I ,at -.l' YlLtuo ARcHrrEcr<t6l€!) Ja^eas Z** AIA pnoH"44, Arzt LEGAI DEscRrPrroN: r,ot j.l- Block 7 Fili.,gvjtrL Ul.Lld3g annpFqq.3L6 6vcq TD Vaq.-, 1o OWNER *"o*" (i,6) 5z+ '7276 ZONE Dl STRI CT PROPOSED USE r TLOT SIZE He j. ghL TOTAI GRFA Primary GRFA Secondary GRFA Setbacks AI I ovJed (30) (33) 4,5?7,b =:t3'1 - zz40,l 20' 15' 15' (30) (s0) q t:t raz?,1 + Front Sides Re ar water Course Setback eito /'nrrarrno Lr nrl cn rn i na Retaining wall Heights Parking Garage Credit Drive: vie',r Corridor Encroachment: Environmenc a 1,/Hazards : =.) 3'/6' 6 neqrd 3033sF ao' 6 (300) (500) (900){120p) l?oo PermitLed SIope _!!_ ActuaI Slope Date approved by Town Engineer: Yes- No-f, ??? 1) Frood Prain a/n 2) Percent SI ope n'/a 3) Geologic Ha zards a) Sno$, Avalanche b) Rock fall c) Debris FIow 4) WeL Iands Previous conditions of approval (check property file) Does Chis reques! involve a 250 Addition? l/ How nuch of Che allowed 250 Addition is used *;EE-Eni" tequestZ 54O *rNote: Under Sections 18.12.090 (B) and 18.13.080 (B) of the Municipal Code' IoLs zoned Two Farnily and Primary,/Secondary which are less than 15'000 sq. fc. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The Community DevelopmenL Department may grant an exception to this restriction prov.ided Lhe applicanL meets the criteria set forth under Sections 18.12.090(B) and l8;13.080(B) of the Municipal Code includlng pernanent.Ly re..;tricLing the un.it as a Long-term rental unit f or f ull-time employees of the U..per Eag]e Val]ey. t*.fr+ Exist inq Proposed Tocal 33 6& sr Q./47z- 3c ( u,+re - t /, 2x 10 o o TOWN OF VAIL DEPA.RT]\1E}T OF CO.\iII L,}-ITI' DE\TLOP:U E}T C}JECXS }'ADE 'AYABLE TO TO\\TI OF \'AIL Kc 5'/,<t rccltcisT !io.ITE:U .\*o. TAx - qoSI Er- - !9tr4t. 0t 0000 41540 ZONING AND ADDRESS N'APS S'.OU 0l 0000 42415 UNIFOR}{ BUILDING CODE s54.00 0t 0000 424r5 UN]FORN,I PLT'\,IBING CODE s19.00 0l 0000 42415 UNIFOR]\{ MECHAN]CAL COI]E s3 7.00 0t 000042415 U r.rN I FORj\4 FI Rt CO DE si6.0t) 0l 0000 4241-i NAT]ONAL ELECTzuCAL CODE s37.00 0t 0000 {l4l i OTIIER CODE BOOKS 0t 00004r518 tsLUb PlUr'" lS (i\'lYLARS s7.00 0t 0000 42412 XERO-X COPIES s0.25 0t 0000 424r2 STUDIES 0l ooo0 .1141l TOVFI-.ES COI\IPUTbR PROGRAIU s5.00 0l 0000 12371 PENALIY ItLS / RE-L.NSPbCI IONS ol (x)c)(l 4l i3z PLAN REVI];\\' RE-CHECK I.EE IS4O PER I]R. 0l 0'000 42_r_il OFF HOURS INSPECTION FF-ES 0l 0000 11.1t2 CONTR-A,CTORS LICI:NSLS FtES 0t oo00 4t413 SIGN APPLIC^TION FEE s20.u0 l-TTG'0Olr4il-l rE, 2- ffiION PRE PAID DESICN RF.\'It,W BOARD FEE -?r INVESTIGATION F EE ( BUILDING) F jl. 0{)(rrr-.\r r,' mTmi -TTTT6 =Tl-06 -TTTOT 0l 00c ot oo0 0r oo0 0l oo0 TT6i -TTTOI 0t oo( 0l 00c lToo-o 0l 000 iU I HT-R OTHER ITOTi.L:;1C' c()taYESiTs : casB r-t cK.! | 1 1.1. o Ll REC. BY: ilign Review Action Fan TOWN OF VAIL ,.3 r+ Category Number Project Name: Building Name: Owner. Address and Phone: nrcrritqc{/61D, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot /R Block 7 Subdivision Project Slreet Address: Comments: --\,'Board i9tatt Action \-_--- -- Motionby'. E.^ v-',t'- Vote: 5-d Secondedby'..,(I / )) ). X Approval ! Disapproval 3 Statf Approval Conditions: Town Planner Date: DRB Fee Pre-Paid I rt t I I q I i ri ti il I I t t il x il iI I t il il il il rl ii !l a)I z @ r- s Qr z (lt o 'F (J F I o E!. J { ru r|i ru c.ll o tr ,.4 o -tr .1 -rft o ..4 ru o A J J o o:t- =s* Fl o3 X=q El*Hb "iIi5 148"e r=:=*J 5E-hS =<E FE <\ LLC jut ? 4 1gg5 Bruce D. Chapman Timothy i Drisko Ann Reilly Bishop r\,'\ll\it Counsel ff';\l dF Rock U-\- drnColorado and Georgia) M. Barry Leitz (Federal Tax Matters- Admitted in Georgia)Town Of Vail Design Review Board Vail, CO 81657 RE: Application for conceptual analysis by DRB for physical separatlon of Primary/Secondary units due to significant site constraints. Dear DRB, Pursuant to section 18.54.050 l('t) "Design Guidelines" of the TOV zoning ordinances, because of significant site constraints on lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, an application has been filed for a conceptual evaluation of the feasibility of separation of the primary and secondary units. The Drisko's desire to sell the rights to the Primary unit on their property. There is existing an older home on the lot which will remain the Secondary side. Because there exists two of the largest pine trees in the area separating what would be the primary and secondary units on the lot, and steep grades on the west side of the existing house, there exists significant constraints to building an attached primary side to this home. Therefore we would like the DRB to look into a possible separation of the units. The Drisko's architect, Steve Riden, is drafting a site plan of the proposed primary unit. This will be filed with you as soon as he completes his work and well before the August 16 DRB meeting. There is good access off Forest Road to the proposed primary unit. At this time only a site plan is being presented because detailed elevations of the proposed unit may not be necessary until there is conditional approval of the concept by the DRB. lwill be present at the August 16, '1995 meeting to present the proposal. L\. \J . ,--l \t l, t. t--\^a, r',,,-<'Jl-\, - - (, _i \i x4r -\-/ r-- ,!.--rAr^r ( Vt..,Wrr-l ,^r. j lwpdoc\ltrstjd\d risko.d rb I J\-*- i,-r',^; -Jtr-f-r-''-3 (l r-ili 143 East Meadow Drive. Suite 498 Vail. Colorado 81657 Telephone: (303) 476-0075 Facsimile: (303) 476-0078 rayl.A 3ll7l91 DESIGN .i REVIEW BOARD APPIJICATION ' TOIIN OF DATE RECETVED: DATE OF DRB MEETING: ::tttt!t!t*rtrt* r. B. D. F. TYPE OF REVIEW: New Const,rucrion (9200. 00) Itinor Alt,eraE,ion ($20.00)Addition ($50.00) x ConcepEual Review (g0) ADDRESS: ??q E.'roet a.\qd \rail, CO g165" LEGAI DESCRIPTION: LoI ]R BlocK ' .7 Subdivision Vai l v.i I laga. F.i rcr Fi lrng If property is described by a meets and bounds lega1 descripLion, please provide on a separat,e sheet and atLach to Lhis application. ZONING: NAME OF Mailing APPLICANT: Robert M. DrisKo Address: ??5 trorect Road, Vail Cn g165? Phone 47l-q'7't1 Vai 1, oo '1 R657 phone a-76_^rr'7a H. NAI'{E OF OhINER (S) : p..,r^,p rr v- n.i.r.r.,, OWNER(S] STGNATVRE: r^it F^ BlGq- - _ Phone APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED 'IITHOU? OWNER'S S.TGfiATUR.E Condominium Approval if applicable. G. NAI{E oF APPIJTCA}IT'S REPRESENTATTVE: Tim priskn. arrornev rn Fa.,r . Mailing Address: r'h: Fgman 6, Dricko r43 Eact l"read,nr., Driv . qta zoR J. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at, the time of submitLal of the DRB application. LaEer, when applying for a building permi.t, please id.ent,ify t.he accurate varuation of Lhe proposal . The Town of Vail will adjust Ehe fee according t.o the Lab1e below, t.o ensure Uhe corrlcL fee is paid. ,JI\l. [jrFi A. DESCRIPTfON:. Thi s arurt inaf inn iq far a nnnncF,t- Ua 1 aFrFrrnr? r tC Fprmtt a nhysr..a l sefiarFf i.rn of lrni].s in I pr i ma ry/so...|nd: ry zarnca{ ercF arlrF tn s.l g.n i f i r.:ni si l- p ar)ncf rei nl- c ****tt*t** ErErF QrruFnrrr Ei. VAI,UATION $ 0 $ 10,000 ,P ruruur - + Jv,tvv $ s0,001 $ 150,000 $1s0,001 $ s00,000 $500,001_ - 91,000.000 $ over $1.,000,000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVATJ EXPIRES APPROVAIJ I]NI'ESS A BUILDING PERI{IT IS IS STARTED, FEE $ 20.00 $ 50. uu $100.00 $200. 00 $400.00 $500.00 ONE YE.AR AFTER FTNAI-, TSSUED AIID CONSTRUCTTON revis'rd 1o/sO appfication o? I. D. c. LOCATION OF BLOCX A IPPLICI,TION FOR A \,iARI.ANCE This procedure is required for any project requesting a variance. The application will not be accepted untii aII information is submitted. A. NA.r'rE oF arplrcarr-TlgantiS-Q.\sk-o B. NAHE oF APPLICANT,S R-EPRESENTATIVEJIYEA-\IISEaEIE€.-) ADDRESS Fo 3z3D VA.IL , c-c, t2t6s6 PEC MEETING DATE NAME OF OWNER(S) (type or pr ilB-{ tJcs pEsro r.L-s . '727o PROPOSAL: LEGAL DESCRIpTION: LOT Ib Frr,rNG VhtL \-zLL Lar-g le Ft Ll"-;e G"C( ADDRES lzs '2-2< FeB-gr E.tD ttIJ L'iIIf J J E. FEE S25O.OO PAID CK + BY THE FEE MT'ST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIILL ACCEPT I'1]IT PROPOSAL. F. Stampedf addressed envelll,:s of the nanes of owners of aIl property adjacent tc,i.e subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and a tist- of their names and mailing addresses. THE APPIICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES. II. A pre-appl-ication conference with a planning staff member is strongl-y suggested to det.ermine if anj additional irrformation is needed. No application will be accepted unless it is complete (must include aII j-tems required bv the zoning administrator) . It is the applicant,S responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find oLrt about addj-tional submittal requiremencs. I1I. PLEASE NOTE THAT A g9!P-.LETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPR.OVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) I.IAY STIPULATE. ATL CONDIT1ONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE I.OMPLIED WITH BEFbFE A BUILDING PERMIT ]S I S SUED FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FT,- .,.IG MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS : 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potenLial uses and structures in Lhe viciniLy. s Zleo g? ezE> ED t. C. Applications deened by the Conununity DevelopmenL :il:3:":'"1i5 ;:3"i:i:':'"$;i?ldE#::.oln tn" connulTity tDay require revlew by consultlts other that town staff. Should a determlnation be made by the topn staff that an outside consultant is needed to review any appllcation, Connunity Development may hire an outslde consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money neceasary to pay hin or her and this amount shaLl be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time he files his application wlth the Cotnmunit.y Development Departtnent. Upon cotnpletLon of the review of the application by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded by the applicant for patrment of the consultant which have not been paid to the consultant shall- be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the anount forwarded by the applicant shall be pald to the Torrn by the applicant wlthin 30 days of notlflcation by the Town. E N .l A M E S. POST OFFICE BOX 3238 vAIL, CO.81658 FAX 949-0304 Pliiining and Environmental Commission Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 January 8, 1995 Members of the Commission" Dr. and Mrs. Drisko respecthrlly request a variance to the provisions of the zoning ordinances that require a20 faot setback from the fror* property line. This is to allow the construction of a new residence with a garage/ deck that is cunently shown in this proposal within the setback. The extreme steepness of the approach to the setbaclg efforts to save sxlme very large trees and the narrowness of the remaining parcel to be dweloped has limited solutions appropriate in resolving the specific design iszues. This proposal will be limited to the solutions shown, otherwise a very expensive and potentially inoperative and possibly massive structure would be required just to allow access to the site. The desigrr criteria solution that I am suggesting will also keep the new residence from oncroaching upon the views of the adjacent properties, by maintaining an open spaoe on the north portion of the site. Please note the garage is well below street grade and the deck provides access to the residence. Extensive landscaping will also be provided as well as repairs and alterations to the existing structures, to update them and insure their compatibility to the new development. This proposal has no effect upon the light, atr, populatior\ transportatioq trafrc, utilities and public safety and is compatible with other such developments in the inrmediate area. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Stwen James Riden A.I.A. . MEMBER OF AMERICAN TNSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. ames A Bryan, -Jirsi,p t HERMAN & JANE HELLBERG BYRON WILLIAMS GLEN OAK INVESTMENT, INC. clo perucol ENTERpRTSES RourE 2,Boxg7s-7 7g rHE BRTDGE pATH 322 N. MAIN STREET BUCKHANNON, WV 26201 ONTARIO, CANADA M3BWBl CHAUFONT, PA 18914 PETER TUFO WILLIAM BROWN THE COUSINS OF VAIL 164 EAST 72ND STREET 575 HAYNE ROAD % JACKMAN S. VODRAY NEW YORK, NY 10021 HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010 P.O. BOX 60 EAST LIVERPOOL, MN 43920 WALTER HOSSMAN PETER KALKUS JOHN & MARY WITTEMYER P.O.BOX2221 % LAMAR COMPANIES P.O. BOX 1ZI4O LITTLE ROCK, ARK 72203 365 SOUTH STREET BOULDER, CO 80303 MORRTSTOWN, NJ 07960 8/5 cd{oc{-rrs ea-!^'t- -'neil[ 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303 -479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 39 FAX 303-479-2452 November 19. 1993 De partment of C ommunity Development Mr. Steven Riden P.O. Box 2338 Vail. CO 81658 RE: Lot 18, Block 7, VailVillage 1st Filing Dear Steve: As we have recenfly discussed concerning the Drisco redevelopment, the following calculations show this lol's development potential: Total Lot Size: Zoning: TotalAllowable GRFA: Primary: Credit: AdditionalGRFA: Secondary: Credit: Additional GBFA: 23,078.1square feet Primary/Secondary 15,000 x .25 = 3,750 5 8.078.1 x.10= 80LY Total :4 Tsquare feet .60x4,557.8=2,734.7 __ 425 = 250* Total = 3,4Q9.7 square feet .40x4,577.8=1,823.1 = 425 = 250* Total = 2,498.1 square feet (The secondary unit may not exceed 40% but the primary unit may exceed 60% with secondary being reduced accordingly). ' Statf has reviewed the documentation provided by the applicant from Upper Eagte Valley Water and Sanitation District. We understand that when the structure was built, there were two kitchens within the building. As a result, there have been two dwelling units on-site lor more than five years. As a result, there are two 250s available to this site at this time which can be requested. All requirements of 250 must be met. Mr. Riden November 19, 1993 Page Two lf the existing structure can be modified in such a way to make a single dwelling unit and to reduce the GRFA to the amount shown above for the secondary unit, then amount shown for the primary unit is available for redevelopment. All other development statistics, such as driveway grade, site coverage, building height, etc. must be taken into account and followed. lf you have any questions about this information, please call me at 479-2138. Sincerely, fl-q /-^4^ nnoy Khrdtsen \ Senior Planner lsco ' BYRON WILLIAMS ROUTE 2, BOX375-7 BUCKHANNON, WV 26201 WILLIAM BROWN 575 HAYNE ROAD HILLSBOROUGH. CA 94010 PETER KALKUS O/O LAMAR COMPANIES 365 SOUTH STREET MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960 HERMAN & JANE HELLBERG C/O PENCOL ENTERPRISES 322 N. MAIN STREET CHAUFONT, PA 18914 PETER TUFO 164 EAST 72ND STREET NEWYORK, NY 10021 WALTER HOSSMAN P.O. BOX2221 LITTLE BOCK, ARK 72203 GLEN OAK INVESTMENT, INC. 78 THE BRIDGE PATH ONTARIO, CANADA M3BWBl THE COUSINS OF VAIL % JACKMAN S. VODRAY P.O. BOX 60 EAST LIVERPOOL. MN 43920 JOHN & MARY WITTEMYER P.O. BOX 1440 BOULDER. CO 80303 ' nl:' : '' \ * THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY f ,uBLtc NortcE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold apublic hearing in accordancewith Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vailon October 11, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: 1. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at 580 S. Frontage Road EasUan unplatted parcel located between Vail Village 7th Filing and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center Planner: Andy Knudtsen 2. A request for a height variance to allow for dormers to be constructed at the Mountain Haus located at262 East Meadow Drive/partof Tract B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Mountain Haus Condominium Association Planner: Shelly Mello 3. A request for a fence height variance to allow for a fence to be constructed around a swimming pool at the May Residence located at 1119 Ptarmigan Roadilot 6, and the east 1/2 of Lot 5, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Paula May Planner: Shelly Mello 4. A request for an amendment to SDD #4, Area D, to allow an expansion to the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesVLot 45, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Planner: Shelly Mello 5. A request for a major exterior alteration in CCl, for an addition to the Cyranos Building, located at 298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Margretta B. Parks Planners: Mike Mollica 6. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of three Type lV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows: A part of Tract "B" and a part of Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more parlicularly described as follows: Commencing at the Nonheast corner of Vall Village, First Filing; thence Nonh 79%6'00'West along lhe Southerly line of U.S. Highway No. 6 a distance of 367.06 feet to lhe Northeast corner of said Tract "B": thence South 10"14'00" West along the Easterly line of said Tract "8"; a distance of 198.31 feet 10 the Southeasterly corner of said Tract "B'; thence Nonh 79"46'00'West along lhe Southerly line of said Tract "B" a distance of 100.00 feet to the true point of beginning thence Norlh 09"10'07" West a distance ot 41.87 feeu thence Soulh 88"27'11' West a distance ol 75.21 leet thence South 27"13'37' East a distance of 77.37 teeli thence North 57"24'00" East a distance of 55.1 1 feet, more or less lo the true point of beginning. Applicant: David Smith Planner: Jim Curnutte 7. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 'l , Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte 8. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing/325 Forest Road. Applicant: Timothy Drisko Planner: Andy Knudtsen 9. A request for approval of the Cemetery Master Plan and Report, for the Town of Vail Cemetery to be constructed in the upper bench of Donovan Park. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Andy Knudtsen 10. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 'l for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.Ay'ail Associates, Inc./G P H Partners, Ltd./lvlarg aritaville, Inc. Planner: Mike Mollica t DZl.Soo HERMAN & JANE HELLBERG BYRON WILLIAMS GLEN OAK INVESTMENT, INC. C/O PENCOL ENTERPRISES ROUTE 2, BOX375-7 78 THE BRIDGE PATH 322 N. MAIN STREET BUCKHANNON, WV 26201 ONTARIO, CANADA M3BWB1 CHAUFONT, PA 18914 PETER TUFO WILLIAM BROWN THE COUSINS OF VAIL 164 EAST 72ND STREET 575 HAYNE ROAD % JACKMAN S. VODRAY NEW YORK, NY 10021 HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010 P.O. BOX 60 EAST LIVEHPOOL, MN 4€1920 WALTER HOSSMAN PETER KALKUS JOHN & MARY WITTEMYER P.O.BOX2221 % LAMAR COMPANIES P.O. BOX 1440 LITTLE ROCK, ARK 72203 365 SOUTH STREET BOULDER, CO 80303 MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960 qlqlq3-.*t THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the MunicipalCode of the Town of Vail on September 27,1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal BuiHing. In consideration of: 1. A request for a conditional use to allow a cemetery in an Agricultural Open Space zone district and a request for a variance from the paving standards to allow a gravel road to be constructed in the Town of Vail Cemetery located in the upper bench of Donovan Park. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Andy Knudtsen 2. A request for a minor subdivision, a request for a rezoning from Agriculture Open Space to Greenbelt Natural Open Space and Low Density Multi-Family and a request for a variance to allow parking in the front setback for an unplatted parcel located between Tract C, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch and Parcel B for the purpose of allowing an employee housing development. Applicant Vail Housing Authority Planner: Andy Knudtsen 3. A request for approval of the Cemetery Report, for the Town of Vail Gemetery to be constructed in the upper bench of Donovan Park. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Andy Knudtsen 4. A request for a density variance and a setback variance to allow for an addition to Unit 28, Tract B, Bighorn Townhomes/4718 Meadow Drive. Applicanl Jerald and Mary Lou Kocak and John and Julie Mork Planner: Jim Curnutte 5. A request for a density variance and a setback variance to allow for an expansion to a residence located at Lot 198, Block 9, Vail Intermountainl2S54 Snowberry Drive. Applicant Millie Hamner, Chris and Mary Ball Planner: Jim Curnutte 6. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte 7. 8, A review of a request to lift a deed restriction for the Todger Anderson residence located at Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lionsridge 4th Filingl1775 Sandstone Drive. A request for an amendment to SDD #4, Area D, to allow an expansion to the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesULot45, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: Todger Anderson, represented by Tom Braun, Peter Jamar Associates Andy Knudtsen Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Shelly Mello Timothy Drisko Andy Knudtsen VailAthletic Club Shelly Mello A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, VailVillage 1st Filing/32s Forest Road. 10.A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the expansion ot the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Nonheast corner ol said Tract B; thence N 79"46'00" W along lhe Norlherly line of Vail Village, First Filing, and along the Northerly line of said Tracl B 622.86 feel; thence S 06'26'52'W a distance of 348.83 feet to lhe Southwesl corner ol that parcel of land described in Book 1 91 at Page 1 39 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle Counly Records, said corner also being rhe True Point of Beginning; lhence S 79'04'08' E and along the Southerly line of said parcel 200.00 teet to the Soulheast corner thereof; thence N 62"52'00" E and along the Northerly line of that parcel of land described in PfJ/ok 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in tho Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78 feel to the Northeasterly comer of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road, as planed in Vail Village, Fifth Filing;lhence N 27'13'37' W a dislance ot 77.37 teel along said Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road; lhence N 89'29'22" W a dislance of 12.80 feet lo the Northeasterly corner ol that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and liled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Becords; thence Northwesterly 26.51 feet along the arc of a 37.50 feet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40'30'00" whose chord bears N 53"40'00" W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point of langency; thence N 73'55'00" W and along said langent 166.44 feet; thence N 85'10'21" W a distance of 50.40 feet lo the Nonhwesterly corner of the Mountain Haus Parcel; thence S 02'18'00'W and along the easlerly line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 1 00.00 feet lo th6 Southeasterly corner thereof; lhence S 45'13'53' E a dislance ot 38.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning, conlaining 30,486 square feet, more or less. o Dalton Williams made a motion to table this item until September 27, 1993 with Jeff Bowen seconding this motion. A 7-0 vote tabled this item until September 27,1993. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot t8, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing/325 Forest Road. Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 27. 1993 Dalton Williams made a motion to table this item until September 27, 1993 with Jeff Bowen seconding this motion. A 7-0 vote tabled this item until September 27,1993. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, Firsl Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more parlicularly described as follows: Commencing at the Norlheast corner of said Tract B; thence N 79'46'00" W along the Northerly line of Vail Village, First Filing, and along lhe Northerly line of said Tract B 622.86 Jeet;thence S 06"26'52" W a distance of 348.83 feel to the Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1 966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle Gounty Records, said corner also being the True Poinl of Beginning; thence S 79'04'08" E and along lhe Southerly line of said parcel 200.00 feet lo the Southeast corner thereof; lhence N 62'52'00" E and along lhe Norlherly line of that parcel of land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in lhe Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78 feet lo the Northeasterly corner of said parcel of land; said corner being on the Weslerly right-of-way line of Gore creek Road, as planed in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27'13'37" W a distance ot 77.37 feet along said Westerly righl-oFway line of Gore Creek Road; lhence N 89'29'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to the Northeaslerly corner of thal parcel ol land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and tiled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Nonhwesterly 26.51 feet along the arc of a 37-50 feet radius curve lo the left having a central angle of 40'30'00" whose chord bears N 53"40'00" W a distance of 25.96 feel to a point of tangency: thence N 73'55'00" W and along said tangent 166.44 feet; thence N 85"10'21' W a distance of 50.40 feet to lhe Nonhwesterly corner of the Mountain Haus Parcel; thence S 02'18'00" W and along lhe easterly line of said Mounlain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner lhereof; lhence S 45'13'53" E a distance ol 38.70 feet lo the True Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet, more or less. 10. Applicant: Planner: vailAthletic club Shelly Mello TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 I t- Dalton Wiffiams made a motion to table this item until September 27,1993 with Jeff Bowen seconding this motion. A 7-0 vote tabled this item until September 27,1993. Approve revisions to the July 12, 1993 PEC minutes. Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the amended July 12, 1993 PEC minutes with Dalton Williams seconding this motion. A 6-0-1 vote approved the revisions to the July 12, 1993 PEC minutes with Kathy Langenwalter abstaining. Planning and Environmental commission September 13, 1993 15 HERMAN & JANE HELLBERG BYRON WILLIAMS GLEN OAK INVESTMENT, INC. C/O PENCOL ENTERPRISES ROUTE 2, BOX 375-7 78 THE BRIDGE PATH 322 N. MAIN STREET BUCKHANNON, VVV 26201 ONTARIO, CANADA M3BWBl CHAUFONT, PA 18914 PETER TUFO WILLIAM BROWN THE COUSINS OF VAIL 164 EAST 72ND STREET 575 HAYNE ROAD % JACKMAN S. VODRAY NEW YORK, NY 10021 HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010 P.O. BOX 60 EAST LIVERPOOL, MN 43920 WALTER HOSSMAN PETEB KALKUS JOHN & MARY WITTEMYER P.O.BOX2221 % LAMAR COMPANIES P.O. BOX 1440 LITTLE ROCK, ARK 72203 365 SOUTH STREET BOULDER, CO 80303 MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960 t/a[o/Qg- o'on,j Sr-n^s cl L-r u'S i''i THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on September 13, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: 1. A request for an amendment to SDD #4, Area D, to allow an expansion to the Glen Lyon Office Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesULot 45, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet Federal Savings and Loan Planner:Shelly Mello 2. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2 and Tract E, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.A/ail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Mike Mollica 3. A request for a density variance and a setback variance to allow for an expansion to a residence located at Lot 198, Block 9, Vail Intermounlainl2914 Snowberry Drive. Applicant: Millie Hammer, Chris and Mary Ball Planner:Jim Curnutte A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing/325 Forest Road. Applicant: Timothy Drisko Planner:Andy Knudtsen 5. A request for a minor subdivision, a request for variances for wall heights, construction in an area with slopes in excess ol 40% and parking in the front setback and an amendment to the approved development plan for the for the Briar Patch development located at 1398 Butfehr Creek Road/Lot F, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 2. Applicant: Briar Patch Condominiums Planner:Shelly Mello Planner: 6. A review of a request to lift a deed restriction for the Todger Anderson residence located at Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lionsridge 4th Filin!1775 Sandstone Drive. Applicant: Todger Anderson, represented by Tom Braun, Peter Jamar Associates Planner: Andy Knudtsen 7. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town ol Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly described as lollows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Tract B; thence N 79"46'00" W along the Northerly line of Vail Village, First Filing, and along the Northerly line of said Tract B 622.86 leet; thence S 06"26'52" W a distance of 348.83 leet 10 the Southwest comer of that parcel ol land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said corner also being tha True Point of Beginning; thence S 79"04'08' E and along the Southerly line of said parcel 200.00 teet to lhe Southeast comer lhereof; thence N 52"52'00" E and along the Northerly line of thal parcel of land described in Book 222 al Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78 feel to the Northeasterly comer ol said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly rightof-way line of Gore Creek Road, as platled in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27"13'37" W a distance ot 77.37 Ieel along said Westerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89'29'22" W a dislance of 12.80 feet lo the Northeasterly corner of that parcel ol land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1 966 and f iled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesterly 26.51 f€et along lhe arc of a 37.50 leet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40"30'00" whose chord bears N 53"40'00' W a distance of 25.96 feet to a point ol tangency; thence N 73"55'00" W and along said tangent 166.44 teel; thence N 85"10'21'W a distance of 50.40 feet lo the Northwesterly corner ol lhe Mountain Haus Parcel; thence S 02"18'00'W and along ths easterly line of said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 feet lo the Soulheasterly comer thereof; thence S 45'13'53' E a distance of 38.70 feet 1o the Tru6 Point of Beginning, conlaining 30,486 square {eel, more or less. Applicant: Vail Athletic Club Planner: Shelly Mello 8. A request for a density variance and a setback variance to allow for an addition to Unit 28, Tract B, Bighom Townhomes/4718 Meadow Drive. Applicant: Jerald and Mary Lou Kocak and John and Julie Mork Planner: Jim Curnutte 9. A request to amend the Golden Peak Ski Base development plan and a request for a landscape variance for Tract F, Vail Village 5th Filing/458 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc. Planner: Andy Knudtsen 10. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filingi3Sl Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte TOWNOFVAIL ftl Departnent of Community 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 39 FAX 303-479-2452 SePtember 10, 1993 Mr. Steve Riden P.O. Box 3238 Vail, CO 81658 BE: Lot 18, Block 7, VailVillage lst Filing Dear Steve: I understand from our phone conversation today that the Drisco variance will be tabled until October 1 1, 1993. prease f<elp in mind mat w6 will need a full two weeks to review the plans prior to a hearing. rn oro"r'io 5t"v on rn" o"-touer 11, 1993 PEC agenda, please submit ;;pfu; orawin-gs no later than September 27' 1993 at 5:00 p'm' lf you have any questions about this, please give me a call' Sincerely, / &-- A s4, I fi'-14 l- t wl -J ,14 3 1a 5l bl" A N t ,taJ '. nzO FaF<T FoAD E3gi, Perlgr-opunE4It- P*fiA: (Ext6nFle') -fat*u afie 5.fr *L. Zno7U,62 ,fr T,frh+L fulac*-ts.VgiH-= +b'5b F.,t &eA = z7.vt'6 6TAnrtr^F{p ogcf;tt = <zQ /p111ss1.;n@, ,"r.^4 = -&- 6"ou (^od Tton'btt l5zv,? 6-ft (HtT 4z5,cl pr6 _25a . ?in,az T L- I 'l'\ hnrr WW W?no. N}dE: Ba ta Co^ @ a]+@t(4 6,2.9Poa't"zl, *^ a'/ f+ s,k c.t *-l da- , o€t:2x> TO ROW+ lT5 a? 211b,2 - 6rl We, W)owvt' .Ftl &Azut, O # -...;rA.1 ,tct,1.,'.'.,. ('d'-,-fu*\ f + 2 I y^-'t' o\\2 ,v.6 t'L- /\..^) P-r; 4 l" A S-n "'t/ ,e*,>huS J ?t o.m t*.f zil L z(/az".l|I 4"zJ v (^-t /gilt'k^, i14 ..,.rr^/d *of *ff* -T Yl? llP adfl ,N n'tq 2Vqa61ap2 + *p^q(rz 4rur5 lclb? zNtRth. Exvf vrr lzeaoqoee Ntees TLIE t-2:5= ?,!..'-'::\'^':-,&F!,F3 ' 1 .:. o ' VerY trulY Yours' It Ja.rurarY t?$'l .l Dr. Robert M' -Drisko ieio-i. c. Nichols Parkway il;ffi; ditv' -lttutouri 641 i2 : Dear Dr" Driskrr: I i it*, yolr very rrlr'ch for yaur'prorript atienticn io our letter : :oi lo *cember 1r'1s6' , :\lJe rvish to clarlfy for you tira addjlional chargeof $82' 5O'as tollows: t. Our records 'tttiir:ate itrai adciilio:r.al liiLcherr iaciiities have beon installecl ln vo*'l"stOu""u' Ybtt vliii notiee' therelore' tirat your revised ;;t; Sy-"blrr assessrnerrf re{iects two oit*frun" insteaEl of lhe origitrai otte' The tap fee ror the extl'a kitchen i?-"^""*pj't3$iiO ""- *i.50 poirlts or ' 25 units x qtov".' Z. UE':n re-inspectton of your' l::iq:l*" and re'rievl oi y'?or r1i.e. vre h'uu ro"''d'i;"*:ii:l:.1i,t,'""1Y:;e not belns tri]led ior one.lau$,hl'31:"di;,ilid;"Fsb0. ; 7. ric IrTaturally, the Disi;rict r's absorbiiy-?" ioss oi this revenue' | ;iil;;;; not n$iins vou retroactiveiv' Arevisedtroinr j#:*:i;?1-ffi:*T-f;1"f"!l-l?!!+,:1t jg vlould very mucn i contents ",,a u e' itlIft f * ;; 1f . all- waier lclns o* it'g f acllitl es ln your ,"*ia*o*u L"'J """'*ttry reflected tberelri' Hyou,,l.1 jo,*Il:*Tf ffi *"[i;i""-""-ffii'.[?ffi T"ffi.,'li" tnformatlon rurnli $S3.S0charge' . i.-_r.-_r'-^g Please do not hestlate to contacl us il you destre Jurther Xnformatlon' Vatl rJiater and Sanitation District 1n/.t-W trr Er gt'nehllCh r -g : =b I VAIL HATER E SANITATION DISTRICT P. 0. Box 565 Vail, Colopado 81657 POI}.IT SYSTEM Residential on €anmelcdaf Drisk.o-L Dr.: Rglert Address 46?0 Nl.phol6 parkl,rav Kqnses Citv. MiF6ourl - Lot*J8----.,-:.,.::'-Floq&a::ii€-:-ii::::::L:-ri"tirlg:::'fir'st '.: 1 Bas lst*-l_ (count for L.aundny Tub)2nd-_3rd...__ I t'lash Bolrl 0.2S boints . zs Bas zno Bas rst 2nd-.-*3r'd- Ba3 tst 2nd--3rd q 8as 1st_-2nd.-.- 3"d_-*--_!_ Bag l st-.*2nd--_3rd-*-ll-Xitche:1 Bas r6t ? nd---,__3:rd--*_] f taundry 1 Out 6ide One-Half Bath (Basin and Toil.et ) one-IJalf Bath ( Shor+er or Tub) Fu].L Bath ( Shower" or: Tub,Baein, Toilet ) Facilities Water. 1.50 Foi nts r.DrJ l.olnts 3.0 Points rr.0 1.0 Points 4. c z.so: p"int. {!61 0,50 Points_ . EO 1.0 Points 1.0 Total Points 22.7s 10 Points = 1,0 Unlts ri Total unit62!2?g x $g0O = -q_6S2.S0 -_Pald Or.igins[y G00. O0__ Arnount Due $ 82. S0 Tr! r [,nr!/' i.. b- ...-.' .. lj .{ Art Abplanalp stated that with regard to the list of conditional uses, it did not sound like there were issues concerning ltem F (ski lifts, tows and runs) and G (cemeteries). He said that he did not want to see the logical conditional uses for the Recreation and Open Space Zone District removed. Kathy stated that it sounded like the three categories needed to address 1) preservation, 2) passive recreation and 3) active recreation. Kristan Pritz inquired whether the PEC wanted the Recreation and Open Space zone district to be mainly oriented toward passive recreational activities. Kathy stated lhat this was correct. Russ Forrest suggested that staff would focus on moving active recreational uses to the Public Use District. Further discussions were necessary with staff and Tom Moorhead to investigate this alternative. An update on a previously approved conditional use permit for a well water treatment facility, generally located south of the Vail Golf Course bridge on Vail Valley Drive, (Well R-4). Planner:Mike Mollica The PEC commented that the gravel needed to be cutback in the area of the pulloff, that the willows needed to be planted and that the rock drop structure be placed where the Division of Wildlife wants it. lf DOW did not want the drop structure at all, then the condition could be removed. 6. A request for a minor subdivision, a request for a variance from Section 18.13.050 buildable area, and a request for a rezoning from the High Density Multi-Family to the PrimaryiSecondary Residential zone district for a property located at Lot 4, Block 3, Bighorn Subdivision Filing No. 314333 Bighorn Road. 5. 7. Diana Donovan made a motion to table this request indefinitely with Bill Anderson seconding this motion. A 4-0 vote tabled this item indefinitely. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for a new residence on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing/325 Forest Road. Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: BAB Partnership Andy Knudtsen TABLED INDEFINITELY Timothy Drisko Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 13,1993 Diana Donovan made a motion to table this request until September 13, 1993 with Bill Anderson seconding this motion. A 4-0 vote tabled this item until September 13, 1993. Plannlng and Environmenlal commlssion August 23, 1993 12 THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERW PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plannino and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance wilh Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on August 23, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. Consideration of: 1. A request for a site coverage variance to allow for an additional covered entry to an existing residence located at 1547-A Springhill Lane/Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Valley 2nd Filing. Applicants: Frank and Marlene Rembert Planner: Andy Knudtsen 2. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the pvnencion of the Vail Athleti4 Cluh, located at 352 Fast \4eadorr Drive, and more specrlically described as fotlows: A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more parlicularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Tract B; thence N 79"46'00'W along the Nonhetly line of Vail Village, First Filing, and along the Northerly line of said Tract B 622.85 feet; thence S 06"26'52" W a distance of 348.83 feet to the Southwest corner of that parcel ol land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle Counly Records, said corner also being the True Point ol Beginning; thence S 79"04'08' E and along the Southerly line o{ said parcel 200.00 leet to the Southeast comer thereof; thence N 62"52'00" E and along the Northerly line of that parcel ol land described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1 971 in the Eagle County Records, a distance ol 66.78 feet to the Northeasterly comer of said parcel ol land; said corner being on lhe Weslerly right-ol-way line of core Creek Road, as planed in Vail Village, Fitlh Filing; lhence N 27'13'37" W a distance o177.37 teel along said Weslerly rightof-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 8929'22" W a distance ol 12.80 feel to the Northeaslerly corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1 966 and f iled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records; thence Northwesterly 26.51 feet along lhe arc of a 37.50 leet radius curve to the left having a central angle of 40"30'00" whose chord bears N 53:40'00" W a dlsiance of 25.95 {eet to a poinl ol tangency; thence N 73'55'00" W and along said tangent 1 56.44 teet; lhence N 85"10'21" W a dislance o{ 50.40 feet lo the Northwesterly corner of the Mounlain Haus Parcel; thence S 02"18'00" W and along the eastelly line ol said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance of 100.00 leet to the Soulheasterly corner thereof; thence S 45013'53' E a distance of 38.70 teet to the True Point ol Beginning, containing 30,486 square f eel, more or less. Applicant: Vail Athletic Club Planner: Shelly Mello 3. A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a CCI exterior alleration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc.A/ail Associates, I nc./Parlners, Ltd JMargaritaville, lnc.Planner: Mike Mollica 4. A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow lor a neril residence'on Lot 18, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing/325 Forest Road. ' . Applicant: TimothY Drisko Planner: Andy Knudtsen 5. A request for a worksession for proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District, and Chapter 18.32 Agricultural and Open Space District, of the Vail Municipal Code. Applicant: Town of Vail Planners: Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest 6. A request for a minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: .lim Curntttte 7. A requestforvariances forwall heights, construction in an areawith slopes in excess of 40% and parking in the front setback and an amendment to the approved development plan for the Briar Patch Condominiums, located at 1398 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot F, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 2. Applicant: Briar Patch Condominiums Planner: Shelly Mello 8. A request for a minor subdivision, a request for a variance from Section 18.13.050 buildable area, and a request for a rezoning from the High Density Multi-Family to the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district for a property located at Lot 4, Block 3, Bighorn Subdivision Filing No. 3/4333 Bighom Road. Applicant: BAB PartnershiP Planner: Andy Knudtsen 9. A request for a modification to the conditional use permit for the snow dump to allow an expansion of the road located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/an unplatted parcel located west of the Town of Vail shoPs. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Andy Knudtsen t INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT:r;s/a / a- ted /.,r*A ' Ar.'11'<- DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: ,.n--'/ ri,id lutE />,q-p/ 3zs fr,*( U. 4 zonthuJ"/ Vl, a-4 *-*;sA|J .r .a ,v..{< x-<-.,^.,./, .L,/ Reviared by: Date: F'/'f ) Gomments: ., q , ) Zfutuz"''-'r/ r4"-- z'/tee"'z'a "6 J czto'u7 /z 4 E Bz z'u Leat-'o'' / 'P.,/,?zJ /4'/ "'Zgd " on"J a'-&*-' ^tc aan'48 0"/ ,5 /"rt / F''-4a/rt '/, Retum n 1- Lt .= -.I Town Planner INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT:.0 .;t,/, / a- ; .q-.ac -a^3ZS 6r-/t-re4" DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS NEEDED 3Y: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: red /.,r*-3 ,.^_",/ /, v+ a-.t --e-+t,Ai .a,2* 4-e .on t hu J "/ ,...u./ {"^^, /, 1 1\[r"J--t-l A D u,-a_-.^, ) \hJ- 4 s;b l'wt J. V\€/^L -# S Cq"ta--. Uh/"+ fr-rttz..w> il*b ,W," ( u-LGr) PLEASE I.,IAKE CHE TOWN OF VAIL D EPA RT;\{E}iT OF COiVIMTJNiTY DEYELOP}IENT' S,lLES ACTION FORM 5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAI) edL 8165 7 0t 0000 4 t540 ZC|\T\'C .{"\D ADDRESS IIAPS 0t 000042415 0t 0000 {2415 0l 000042.il5 0l 0000 {2{ l5 0t 0000 42{ t5 0t cr000 {24 | 2 0l 00cot23?l 0l 00c0{1332 0t r,'Ct00 42323 0t 0000{r330 .0t 0000 414)3 0t 0000124 t5 0t 0000.il543 0t 0000.r1{:2 0l 00004t{t3 ADDITIONAI. SIGNAGE FEE ISI.OO;'ER SO.IT. \TC A RT PRO'ECT DONATION PRE PAJD DESIGN REVIEV BO^RD FEE OI OOCO42412 I BUILDING_CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COMPUTER D 0i 0000 42371 INVESTIGATToN FEE (BUILDTNG) TOTAL DUE: 0l 0000Ir330 USE PEL\TIT I 0t 0000.il330 R ALTERAT]ON II,,ORE THA"{ IOO SO.F|, dI33O' ISPECLAL DEVELOPIfENT * * * * * * * * * PLEASE MAKE TOWN OF VAIL D EPA RT;\{E}iT OF COMMLINITY DEVELOP}IENT . SALES ACTlON FOR}{ RAD0 81657 0l 00004t510 ZCirE\C .!ti\D A DDRESS l {APS 0t 0000421t5 UNTFO L\{ B I'ILDL.-G COD E UMFOL\{ PLUMBD{G CODE 0t 0000 {24 t5 0l 0000 424 I i l.i i :=ce I i;ne,:..r=. C;=h 0t 0000 {241: ':::1 r_ :--l 0l 0000{2{li r 1: *;-,: .i;! | . S-"0.m 0t 0000 {24 t I 0l COoO .l l54S itr,r:- : ; . ,i .. .-if :t+::, 0l 0000.12412 :i- -:,- l 0l 00CO12371 :;l i.''l i,: ];,i.i:::. r.:,t:'l -:.i::.ij ,..'fii:'LHili:ij or occo{t332 -1:':' r- ; ';'':: ':-'t': i'ti 0l 0000 42321 r i -., _. _. i _{ Ol 00rl0llrll2 '! -Ei,, rr'rr'-J 0l cr000{l-'.30 i:: ail:i!:.i;' : ,ii.i.::.i .0t csoo4t1r3 0l 00co 121-10 -I-Htrlt-{F{ \-'r-rLl 0t 00004t331 0r 00004241 *.01 0000 4J 01 0000 42371 TNVESTIGATToN FEE (BUTLDING) TOTAL DUE: R ALTIIRAT]ON Ii\iOR 0t 0000 { I * * * * * * tc tc * /b LOT SUBDIVI S ION UIL'L'MT /qr ;oB NAME |zQLFFl{ et,+r' /u't'r7- BLocK 7 FTLTNG l/ l/ 7- ol- ADDRESS The locatlon and availablltty of utll-lties, whether they be maln trunk lines.or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following utillties for the acconpanying slte plan. Authorlzed Slqnature EEq U. S. west Conmunicatlons 1-8 00-922-198 7 .469-6860 or 94 9-4530 Public Servl-ce Cornpany 94 9-s781 Gary Ha 1l Holy Cross Electrlc Assoc. 949-s892 Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Heritage CablevLsion T. v. 94 9-5530 Steve Hl att Upper EagIe VaIley Waler & Sanitatlon District * 476-7480 Fred Haslee ld:o\tod uAa.,P 2 ? 4. q B-? -?3 NOTE :This forrn ls to verlfy service avallablllty and Iocation. This should be used ln conjunction yrl-th prepdring a utillty plan and scheduling Installatlons. For any nev, constructsion proposal, the applicant must provide a conpleEed utility verlflcatlon form. If a utility company has concerns grith the proposed constructlon, the utllity representaE.lve should note directly on Che utillty verlflcatlon forn that there is a problem whLch needs to be resolved. If the issue is relatLvely compllcated,it should be spelled out in detall in an attachdd letter to the Tonn of vall. Hor,rever, please keep Ln mlnd that lt ls the responslblllty of the utt!.lty company and owner to resolve tdentifled problems. If the utlUty verificatlon forn has slgnatures from each of the utlllty conpanles, and no comnents are made directly on the fo!m, the Town rlll presume that there are no problems and that the development can proceed. These verlflcatlons do not rell-eve the contractor ' of his responslblllty to obtaln a street cut pernit from the To$rn of vail, Department of Publlc Works and to obtaln utllitv locations before dl-oqinq ln any publlc right-of-way or easement ln the Tov,n of .vallj A bulldlnir pbilirl-t ls not a street cut permit. A street cut pertnlt must be obtained separately. * Please brlng d slte plan, floor plan, and elevatLons tfhen obtainlng Upper Eagle VaIley l{ater & Sanitatlon signatures. Flre fLow needs must be addressed. t I \ \ \ \o q \u' >l I )t I t-- '(/) \, t-t- .o -(\ Lr- () (JN il} r! z =i-22 F <I r> o 2 (! $t il lrl J *+ i5i o flru =EL d { r!i Ij a ? o J i :t ,lr ,' uko' kt;'nt/o- = rt);cr = -,,o. I ,q\ t < --.r 1l\x t6, E=-<o Cg I L +3 d k I 1a I t. - /, /El lrl,Ztl i,{ A \y it I :. f!t 19{ :l:' ()jl;3 =1q-4 o,,@ n \\ t"\ \ r"\ @\ ,"x J Eq3 iF* te @\' g t. 8. <!6 X gi; -6f *l= J t:,1+ o I I :--l^- i) ,l il l/ 4 I @ o o RhE F6d 9r- l*""r*rrolr - roe, o! vtrrL, ffir!'d elalgt DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED : DATE OF DRB MEETING: *r*tlrl*r* TETS APPLTCETIOT TILL lror BE ICCIPIID ItNtrL AI.L REQUInED rXrOR l'trotr rs sudtttTrD rt**tl*rrr PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION: !nm'o Auc g,[1995 I. Rt.;tt2{.J(8. \-. B. TYPE OF REVIE}I: X- New Constructlon ($200. OOI Addltlon lS50.00) C. ADDRESS:6 F,,rze D. LEGAL DESCRIPTIoN: Lot Subdivlsion Minor AlteratLon ($20.00) Conceptual Revlew (S0l Block 1 /4r ti. F. H. If property ls descrlbed by description, please provlde attach to thls appllcat ion. a meets and bounds legal on a separate sheet and LOT AREA: ff requlred, applicane must provj.de a current stamped survey showlng lot area. ,7.b cn+.,1 aE. (. .rzgg 4..\ ZONING: NAI.'E OF Mailing APPLTCANT' -i''rrat Varz(E Address: NAME OF Ma iI ing A.t.A. I.NAME OE OWNERS: *srcNtTuRE(sr: Malllng address : VALUATION s 0-s 10,000 910,001 -s 50,000 s50,001 -s 150,000 s150,001 - s 500,000 9500,001 - s1,000,000 I Over $1r 000,000 * D'SIGN REI'IET BOIib APPNO%! IXPIRES OI|l IEIR llllR IIIIAL AEPRo\'I! UNI,ISS A BUII.DINC PENUIT IS ISSUE' HrO_COiiSiiiiCUOT t8 STIRIED. r*lto tpplrcl,Trotf ifrl.L BE tRoctsstD tfrrEottr oI{NER,s SrcNAtuRl Condoninium Approval if appllcabie. FEE s 20.00 I 50.00 9r00.00 s200 .00 $400.00 ss00.00 .t. K. (Ze4) ::;:ffH:' Botanrca'1 Nane"ffi -rl"'!l,r!2 \I V Ara reQ.2 > f,12_crsto.1 f-L J Ar e-".) Ouantitv ExISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED *Indicate sl ze 5 qa11on. GROUND COVERS SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL ,-l ,* /^, n c rt , .u' of proposed shrubs. Tvpe MlnLmum size of shrubs is Square Footaqe Af tAv", €f2 e4-", { tset'oo- rz.l<zt /L) *fL'/2-.t-1.- .1RA/4t, / a./.' /t-/, FL.4 t t< yr1/^- - e Ptafu,"tTt t2 .4t22+a' Ptr.,t t- .v n. rc,,'s ( pntp € 'y'tz l+.:, fe -;rz6a) f,.,',27rtn ,4t pt* | ii Ar+7t a Vl*pr cc'4 LuiLo FLcu'E t/2, I pee'*e'p13 C- LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lightlng is proposed, please 6how the number of fixEures and locatLons dn a separate lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the Iighting plan on the list belohr and provide the wattage, height above grade and type of llght proposed. fzi- Dnzt f Bga19.2zfi llao+c L.r.nito+ Lt6trTht-\ | l|p ttr*rt1 - I 'O Olz se LL'+ e Ft F.* rE s? e t,o r1^lrvnifzz.f tiPa FLtrtPe;'.G i:.1't12.( 4 ntr< ,1ncg1."!tq.-l OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining h'alls, fencei, swlmrning pools, etc.) Please specify. Indlcate heights of retainlng walls. Maximum helght of r,{alls wlthin the front setback ls 3 feet. Ma*imum height of walls elseerhere on the property is 5 feet. (zt: Srft Pu.^"- f.vrr.6 L0l3lg2 tfDtJtiArtott ls requlred appllcatlon submitted. .mrJULp6tssl. AppllcaLlon . bitb -.,- ..-. *-,-_ Fbc I'tEnitNG bAtr.., 812?-'.?3"" I.thls procedure varl-ance r The Lnformation 15 toR A inffrrlcrr for Any projtsct fequestlng a trlll hot be accepted until all A.NAME OF APPLICANT. ADbRESS * I: B.l|At're ot' Ap p L i iArrr r s hep RE s nr.rfAr i vd, filF WI .. J A,i&+ Flyffirl A . t A ,VAu",P6,.fk57. .- " "noNE_nM1_ ADDRESS owNbh (si (t SIGNATURE (S) OF PROPOSAL: LECAL OBSCNTPTTONI c.NAi,IE OF owNEh. ( s ) ADDRESS LOCATION ADDRESS Stampedl addressed envelopes of the names of otrnets of rTI. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COI'PTEtE. APPLICATION WILI, STREAT,ILINE THE APPROVAI PRocEss FoR YouR PRoJEcr BY DECREASTNG THE NuttsER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAI, THAT THE PLANNING AND EI.IVIRONMEHTET, COII,ITSSTON (bEC! },tAY STIPULATE. AI.L Er h FEE $ 4F ! !;E S (XY4^.r_' t7 l^t h- rHE FEE trus,f BE pArD bEFoRE rHE coln4uNrrl DEtrELopMENr IHA f/t nnplRrunffirr,r- AceEpt youR pRoposAIJ. t F.all property adjacent to t_he subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHTND AND AcRoss srREETsr and a ilst of thelr names and maillng addresses, THE AppLICAl.iT WILL bE RESPONSIBTE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES: Ir i A, pre-appllcation conferenc strongly suggested to deter infornation ls needed. No unless it is complete (tnust the zonlng adrilnlst,rator) r responslbtlity to nake an appolntment with the staff to flnd out about addltlonal submlttal requirements. enNDTTTr)Nq .lF llDDDn\tnr lrrtc'r EIF r-/.rMD t rFt\ r.r? 'nu rrtrcl^rrF r (.o o * rr -- 1- I +t1 --t- | +P -7- | #lo -z-7 -v #l -z- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STREET ADDRESS: Lorjp-BLocK 7 suBDrvrsroN 4Zh Fol2Fqf Fe/*t\ l-r"uf,, DESCRTPTToN oF PRoJEcr: 1,1':'t l.!-- 7t*t4 l='l+tc-e'e required for submittal to the Deslgn approval can be glven: TYPE OF MATERIAI COLOR /tr' The following information ls Revlew Board before a final A. BUILDING MATERIATS: Roo f Slding Other Wal.l Materials Fascia sofflts Windows Wlndow Trirn Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Ralls Flues Flashings Chinneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other B. LANDSCAPING: f4En r+u ,?/.'/?,? 42+. r+-'-- oEp4E-B /?zttw', C A4),+/=-a, z-r'- cEa&?- WE/1 r4../ aLl )-L-*7- a,L/< ,4,,4-f ,")r>D r,4.'../ AtL.Lf trt rZ4 .pi4tr1 Co pPt t:- .r- r'.f L'r2+1_- 1f2,2 L .' ,\., // // . t21..Ho- 6!iz /\1,J. PLANT MATERIALS : PROPOSED TREES Name of Designer: phone: Botanical Name EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED Connon Nane LcU.FtPo liLut, LtBfPtL{ rt,r"< *4pec Ouantitv Sl ze* t lo -t?'ptd '7 ,' .) - i'-' ,bi .r, 62 .2,5"L1L 2'ttj' t ze 'u5', ," Lt?bt at t1 .-i-!r_ rfndicate caliper for deciduous trees. Mlnimum calloer for fndicate helght for coni ferous 4fya,t- 'L,6, *./z- DATE: LEGA! DEscRrPrroN: t'ot -!Lsto"x ZONE CHECK FOR SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRI Fl I lng PHONE q74 c( 7t4 rotal -4 ADDhESS3'4'?6 ftEg+:i' rz'dr>lc'E+'.1- zoNE DrsrRrc, P/"t PRoPosED vse /t.E OWNER ' r*Lor srzs Helght ToTAI GRFA Primary GRFA Secondary GRFA setbacks waEer Course setback Site Coverage Landscaping Retaining wall Heights Parking Z Garage Credit Drive: vier.t' Corridor Encroachment : Envlronrnental /Hazards : I Allowed (30r (33) .l 4P. Exlstinq ProDosed (tr",5qc4 ?.$ct /cf 0 425. 425 Front Sides Rea r 20, 15, 15t (30) (50) 4@J 2ttl b, Rockfall -c) Debrls Flow 4) Wetlands- Previous condltlons of approval (check property flle) 5z1b nc, . 24c4r. 3, /6, 'V/4' ,5/ v"'rr:t-aewd 5 (3oor (Goo) <goot rtzoot-ltQ2- Pernltted SloPe ;Q!- Actual SIoPe rc"b (,t<*e) bate approved bY Town Englneer: --Yes-- t'ro:9- taz / 1) Frood Plaln . r''1 4' 2l Percent s:.oqe .L/ 4' 3) Geotogic Hazards . . /a-af Snow Avalanche% Does this request involve a 250 Additlon? 7 Hol, much of the "rro*Ji'ISd eiai[fon ls usefrI6-EEls request?- al IeY . 10 (JO3) 949-4r2r July 26, 1993 UJ). "l,Xlt* t;,qPl vAIL, CO.81658 FAX 949-0304 F!;v" ';fu r&Ju z 6 tgu Members of the commission, Dr. and Mrs. Drisko respecffully request a varience to the provisions of the zoning ordinances t}at require a N foot setback from the front propcrty line. ThiJis to allow the construction of a new residence with a garage / deck that is currently shown in this proposal within the setback- Due to tt" .odffiDn of the €xtreme to the setback , the efforts to saiE--e some very large trees the remaining parcel to be developed , this proposal will I ons shown or a very expensive and potentially inoperative and possibly massive,structure site . This will also keep the new residence from of the adiacent properties by maintaining an open of the site . Please note the g;arage is well below the street grade and the deck provides access to the residence . Extensive landscaping witl also be provided as well as repairs and alterations the the existing structures to update ttrem and insure tlreir compatability to the new development . This proposal has no effect upon the tight , air , population , transportation , traffic-, utilities , and pubic safety and is compatable with ot}er such dwelopments in the immediate area . cooperation is greatly appreciated Regards, Steven James Riden A.I.A. . MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. \-o )r\L' I \ I I €l ll ,rl ..f- \\ \ I ) I l i tr tl Ii tl tI ti t;+$ I \ I I t\ -\ \- / t, \ I i i, I o'\ct\ \o --l -- fi 1\l t'/ i! i'l -- z ,^\J il F Irl J trl ri [r T h. -)$rA --rJ ;.12 -l z. F ;{'t -U) lL-- -, t, *, ZONE CHECK -=ffirrr*r.r,o e Rl VP 'qb DATE: n-,, q n4D ,r-rl | , \_,t LEGAI DESCRIPTION: Lot ADDRESS: l(/ tt ,r'tl C-. f,I q Block / Filing U V,t lk n l\ft , ARcHrrEcr gtat 2; l-.-^_ ZONE DISTNTCT Pi S PHONE PHONE PROPOSED USE @ f,!,LJ q-t..r. Jr', , t,., il- \ ,eLe\ I {**LOT SIZE .574? aL{r< 23,o'75.1 E Heighr E rouat cnra f-TPrimary GRFA ffsecondary GR.FA "s:6tbact<s VtvIu'* =3/sa,1 = 2248./ 20, 15' 15' (30) (s0) 4 b /9.b t 3, 646.8 3'/6' z'(neqrd 49t7.8 7-7t4,1 lA2 3, I Front Sides Rear + 425 + 425 fugtzF <4pb6 ( KaX"t Course Setback t4tu, s (qzz+ \3 4u?'5 la,zgz<h/.,f n-". I stct^,-..- 4 tsool(60))eoo) (1200) boT G\ Pernitted Slope 88 Actual Slope l4'/. Date approved by Town Engineer: No t---a', a 1.) 2l 3) FLood Plain Percent Slope Geologic Hazards a) Snow Avalanche b) Rockfall AI Prevloug conditions of approval Does thle request involve a 250 c) Debris ELow n"^.< r14 Wetlands (check property file) Addition? v\') How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this request? ?e-r-z **Note: Under Sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code, lots zoned Two Family and Primary,/Secondary which are less than 151000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The Comnunity Developnent Department may grant an exception to this restriction provided the applicant meets the criteria set forth under Sections L8-12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code including permanently restricting the unit as a long-term rental unit for fuII- ti.me enployees of the Upper Eagle Valley. tl t I t'1-z; ra.t. C/<'J rn J /lu /af is -y' *," y'/^\ \o)/ -{it" coverage zo'/. 4urr #ascuping t-e-o / i-T-Retaining wall Heighrs 6rxins l-TGarage Credit \l orive: {", Corridcr Encroachment :Yes K r. on^"nt a I./Ha z arcts : (30) (33) r 65-D S /al,( Z=o1('l Q s , o, oy,z s) -r rsP . \ ] ,,\(9,'tt t)( to) = ?P-7'g ---4rr -2. 7 Allowed Existinq Proposed Total @ I,s( LL,^ 3t'/. rrtr d Z,crC .",..r2.t/ -.aty' 4;2 17.'-772d /z-, r'+1.t 1'-a-.ez-.t' ? f 7.,*aVXa^ /,'/f /n/*&*r, 2,oJl fr2vt" /2 v | /)€ /e 4>U /.t)t 7r-//nr' ,,9/ ^2J- wo ,/7--- ac/ vt"rrl /.'/ n'Y "f (D o @ ?--?\ t I o ,4 lf- l2'>1,-w1 e a-.rs,,l/ fi" ''1' s7'-9{25 *w @ >vd #4r @ W .Y , - vt a.,o---, .vy )- *.y.u n1 ?- >l2T?l-^'\r'" O tb -b -g [d., Planning and Environmental Comrnission Conrnunity Development Department April 20, L987 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBTECT: A request for front and side setback variances for a garage located at 325 Forest, Road, Lot Lg, Block 7, VaiI ViIIage lst Filing.Applicant: Tim Drisko I. DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCES REQUESTED On Septenber 8, 1986, the Planning Cornmission reviewed setback requests for a proposed garage on this property. The requests were for encroachments of 9 feet into the side setback and 10 feet into the front setback. The application hras approved by a 6-0 vote. construction errors have resurted in the garage being Located closer to the side lot tine than previously approved by the Planning Cornmission. As existing, the garage encroaches 12.7 feet into the side setback. After learning-of the problen with the location of the garage, the applicant reguLsted approval from the Planning Conmnission for the structure as presently constructed. The Septeurber 8th planning commnission memorandurn of the original reguest is attached for your inforrnation. II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.6L.060 of the municipal code, the Department of Conrrunity Developrnent recommends approvar of the requested setback variances based upon the following factors: Consideration of Factors: As constructed, the garage is located 2.3 feet from the side property 1ine. The previous approval granted a variance to Iocate the garage 5.75 feet from the property line. It is the feeling of the staff that the add.itional encroachrnent proposed will not adversely affect properties in the vicinity of this structure. Existing vegetation should also adequately buffer the structure from the adjacent parcel. ft should also be noted that the location of the garage is j.7 feet from the front property line as opposed to fO-feet as approved with the original proposal. d structures in the t strict and The d erpre necessa tnent ectives s title w The effect, of the ested S t on of ation ac es facil es and sate unifo ev ortoa of varlance on 1i rta on ties to which relief from the on an orcernent of a spec acnleve tib S tio Eo amo -oT literal ation IS of the al rivil a].r c lic The staff has historically been supportive of variance reguests for garage additions throughout the Town. This is particularly true in the Forest Road area where topography and the location of existing structures make site pfinning difficult. To approve this reguest wourd be consistent wlth previously approved variances and would not be a qrant of special privilege. t and and tra There are no significant effects on any of the above mentioned factors. Such other feelers and criteria as the conmission deems III. FINDINGS The strict or literal_ interpretation or enforcement of !!re specified regulation would result in practical difficultly or.unnecessary physicat hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this tilfe. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The Pl and Environmental Comroission shall make the follow s before ncf a var ance: That the granting of the variance wilt not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations oi other properties classified in the same district. That the granting of the variance wilr not be detrimentar to the public health, safety or welfare, or naterially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: rv. The strict interpretation specified regulation would privileges enjoyed by the the same district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION or enforcement of the deprive the applicant of ortrners of other properties in Staff reconmends approval of this request. The previous revietr-of this approval established the physical hardships on this site that necessitated approval of ietback variance-s.These physical hardships are still present in reviewing this application. The same is true with respect to special-privilege. In reviewing the existing location of the garage,it is the feeling of the staff that there is no signiflcanf.increase in any irnpact on adjacent properties. For these reasons, the staff is supporting the requested variance. The location of the existing garage is obviously a result of human error. The staff has traditionally taken a hard line on other projects that requested variances after the fact.This.request.differs from those in that physical hardship and special-priviege were previously establishea Uy the nlaniring Conmission revie$r this past September. In addition, with the exception of-location, the garage is constucted as approved by the Planning Comrnission and Design Review Board. These reasons disting'uish this proposal from other siurirar requests the Planning Conmission has r viewed in the recent past.- r.o -{ o ol at, ^-l trt Ox -an =2 = 6', v, FI t D r t I Ito l!t lo. I I ool I L- -' a z c m u @ r o ft - (, N Ol" 05', E 7 o o (J| o_ v 4 -., ,-, L e o o , o .oJe F* 7s rfp aa e:i 'i? e/ 9u) -{MF om rl lttz -t c,rod lOFa ) r(t icF t!o rtr>,al )ta r)o r< rl LA I f F rO It I FiCl ro iot?tro t46.40'l !gl <I[: mm u?!-!-e ntrI 6@ < HH g ;..;- ltl ttt 0 o FI o 1l o =trt t-o -l f\)o 6'2l .osq T' \ .1. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: II. P1 anning and Environmental Commjssion Communi ty Devel opment Department September 8, .|985 A request for front and side setback variances .construct a galage at 325 Forest Road, Lot 1g, Vi 1 I age lst Fi 'l i ng. Tim Drisko in order to Block 7, Vail I. As proposed,.the garage encroaches 10 feet into the required 20 foot front setback, and 9 feet into the required 15 foot side setback. The garage has been sited in this location for a number of reasons. fo19mo1! among these is the 15 foot grade change from Forest Road to the buildable area of the lot. A second considerafion is that there is development potential for a secondary unit on this lot. The location of the,proposed garage would pose the fewest problems with the future siting of an additional unit. A final consideration in the location of the garage is the existence of a driveway bed leading to the property's parking area. This existing driveway would serve as access to the proposed garage. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS n review of Criteria and Findin s, Section .l8.62.060 o e Munici e, the Department o ommun i t requestecl variances bas on tne ctors: Consideration of Factors: The relationship of requested variance to other existi tential uses tructur deqree t whi ch relief from the strict or litera terpreta and enforcement o a crr'req regutaEton ts necessarv to eve tibilit and un of treatment among sites n the vicinitv or attai n this title hout grant o spec I a The proposed garage addition is only 6 feet frorn the propenty line that separates lot 18 from lot 20. It is felt that existing vegelation between these two lots will offset any potential impacls fiom this construction. tlhile the structure is located only l0 feet from the front property 1ine, it is 23 feet from the exist.ing edge line of Forest Road. The proposed'l ocation of the garage is reasonable with respect to minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. Historically, ihe staff has been very supportive of variance requests for garage \ additions. This is particularly true in the Forest Road area because of existj ng road alignments and topographical constraints in the neighborhood- To approve this request would be consistent wlttr previously approved variances and would not be a grant of special pri vi I ege. i stri ion of u lati on AN SDO ti es ti es u There are no significant effects on any of the above mentioned factors. effect o the Two goals outlined in improving properties garage addition would ed variance on hta al r Action Plan relate to Town of Vai'| . It is improvenent to this III. the Community throughout the provide a fine upgrading and felt that this property. V. IV. FI NDI NGS FACTOR Pl anni Env nol ngs Deto ant e var tal 'l ss't on l'l make the f (That the granting of the variance will not constitute privilege inconsistent with the limitatjons on other classified in the same district. a grant of specia'l properti es That the granting of the variance wi] I not be detrimental to the public hea'l th, safety, or welfare, or material ly .i njurious to properties or improvenents in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: --- The strict or'l iteraT interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation wou'l d resu'l t in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objelt.i ves of thi s ti t'le. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not "ppty genetiiiv to other properties in the same zone. The strict or 'l iteral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation wou'l d deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. -2-e/8/86 PEC a ( / VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS \Staff recommendation for this request is approval . The Department has traditionally encouraged the development of garages and supports this proposal . Any impacts resulting from the setback encroachments are negligible and are far outwei.ghed by the benefits of the garage addi ti on. -3-9/8/86 PEC rD $R $$ Su KP ,I (. s.g l o6 zz HU {B\ I I I 4,eJ ol0 N I -f I s d g s E/SI il!$i z. I :1 'Y I I $ -N s\ \ J I hope the Ar^^^ "^eg 1s,-_------ Thomas A. Braun Senior Planner TAB:bpr 75 south tronlage road yall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 April 2, L9A7 olflce ol communlty development Mr. Tim Drisko 325 Forest Road Vaj-l, colorado 81652 Dear Tim: I would Iike to apologize for any inconvenience resulting from the.rescheduling of_April 13th's planning cornmission meeting to April 20. The rneeting had to be resched.uled. because of our oversight in providing the Vail Trail with proper public notice of your agenda iteur. As you may knohr, we are required to publish agenda items 15 days prior to the neeting date. By missing this deadline, we had no alternative but to reschedure the meeting one week later. once again f apologize for our oversight.rescheduling has not inconvenienced you. Sincerely, PUBLIC NOTICE NOTfCE IS HEREBY GMN that the planning and Environmental Comrnission of the Town of Vait will hold a publie hearing in accordance with section 18.66.060 of the municipal code of the Town of Vail on April ZO, 1-9e7 at 3: OO pM in the Town of VaiI Municipal Building. Consideration of: 1-. Request for a conditional use pennit in order to construct a parking lot on top of the west half of the Upper Eagle Valley !{ater and Sanitation water plant located at 846 VaiI Road. Applicant: Upper Eagle Valtey Consolid.ated Sanitation Dist. 2- Request for a side setback variance in order to construct a residence on Parcel B, a resubdivision of Lots L4 and 17, Block 7, VaiI Village lst Filing. Applicant: Mr. and Mrs. Michael Tennenbaum 3. A request for front, side, and strearn setback variances and a site coverage variance in order to construct an addition to a residence rocated on Lot 3, Brock 1, Vair village lst Filing. Applicant: Jerome A. Lewis, Downing Street Foundation 4. A Request for a side setback variance in order to construct a garage at 325 Forest Road, Lot Lg, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Addition. Applicant: Tirn Drisko 5. A reguest for setback variances in order to construct additions to the property at 3t_5 MiII Creek Circle,LoE Z, Block l, VaiI Village lst Filing. Applicant: Howard, Judy and Steven Berkowitz 6. A request to amend Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, located at l-OO East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Josef Staufer 7. A request to amend the zoning code in order to add a new zone district to be entitled Hillside Residential. Applicant: Town of Vail The applications and inforrnation about the proposars are available in the zoning adrninistratorrs office during regurar office hours for public inspection. TOWN OF VAIL COMMI'NITY DEVEIOPMENT DEPARTMENT THOMAS A. BRAUN Zoning Adruinistrator Published in the Vail Trail on April 3, LggT -To b AJdrtss lai/ Ui//o7a /;T r 4 Urt r thna e-, fr, // e orrVrh < / sa I .zr** /. /s g.) c)drthne e. ^) a s n.rJeJ .b a /4o., a ce€ss /o r'/e ey.s4)zg /rtb 4)d?, /r/< faraf e ,4aJ h /" g/aneJ {fno zl c. &/ ?%..r.-'&, .//< < skre/ zt &on* aak ofesss /o se/ Aaek oanje na€ l/- ,t,j^z-, e- J/--LL//r,) //( farxrr th /le 4rc &/aoL uis esh4t36d ..t 6 yr s ilu ,nea so rr-"nA /oet/e/,/y'/.n Jl € 2ry Ha fi,vZ/ /"" a) 1) aecera/o /nc utr/a?).€ o{s'f" d)ds ool atn/arh a.?a-c /o /Ae J.rLe q)a ?,/ (oil aJ JTaa/<7r.k,f , "'6;1'1 * "n1 /11 ,.rty'"-refh#lzfz/s'fir lhi darrhna€., /tr,, //--2 ,i.f/;t;-al fre/ al€ ,t"deJ /. /b:4,h r4rh /[ri-6J/r"t;nai fre/ 4/€ n"d"J /. ,bo,h yqs< /.o^ *i5" s/rre/, 7/r's a/4<ts /ato 4e?rss, ID t I. This wi ll A. Application OutJy C - lO - f ,/ PEC MEETING DATE procedure is required fgf gny project requesting a variance. The application not be accepted until all information is submitted. NAME OF APPLICANT V'N 7rl's,1 APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE l, R ADDRESS Forrs/ eJ. PH)NE 42/-523/ APPLICANT'S REPRESENT nwz Vry Qrys /o S*n PHONE &M ( C. NAME 0F Ol,lNER(S) (type int) ) E. FEE $100 NAME OF ADDRESS ADDRESi J)s- Fa-rs/ EJ, /al/ PHONE-g,^ 1-_ D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ADDRESS 'J,s-Es7 ,AJ LEGAL DEScRrprroN tot lF a.rlcr_f_nune t/a)l t/,bd. /tT pnt#yl6t;*,hp#-cAsH THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l,|lILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. F. A list of the names of owners o! qlt property adiacent to the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACR0SS STRTETS-, ana tneir rnailing aiOresies. THE APPLIC4NT l.JILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECf MAILING ADDRESSES.rJ on fi7e. II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE l/,lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED TO )DETERMINE IF ANY.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLIcATION WI.i BE. ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUsT INcLUDE ALL ITEMs REQUIRED BY THE ZONiNG lgIINllIR4IgS). IT Is rHE APPLicANT's RESpoNSIBrLrry T0 dnrE nn App0TNTMENT l.llTH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION t^lILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR Y0uR PR0JECT sY oTcREASING-THE NUMBER 0F coNDrTroNS 0F AppRotlAL THAT THE pLANNTNc AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MAY STIPULATE. ALL coNDITIoNS OF APPRoVAL MUsT BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. r I r. F0uR (4) C0prEs 0F THE F0LL0r,,trNG MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: 'l . The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures.i n the vicinity. 2. The^ degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement.of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to itiiin the objectives of this titre without grant of specia1 privi rege. OVER Vari ance 3. The effect of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. B. A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at'l east l" - 20' stamped by a Colorado licensed surveyor inc'l uding locations of all exist'i ng improve- ments, 'including grades and elevations. Other e'l ements which must be shown are parking and loading areas, ingress and egress, landscpped areas and utility and drainage features. C. A site plan at a scale of at'l east l" = 20' showing ex'i sting and proposed bu i 1di ngs. D. A11 preliminary building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensigns, g€h€rd1 appearance, scale and use of al'l buildings and spaces existing and proposed on the site. E. A preliminary title report to verify ownership and easements F. If the proposal is'located jn a multi-family development which has a homeowners' association, then written approval from the assocjation in support of the proJebt must be received by a du'ly authorized agent for said association. h.Any additional material necessary for the determined by the zoning administrator.. For interior modjfications, an improvement wajved by the zoning admin'istrator. review of the application as survey and site plan may be lv.Time Requirments The Planning and Environmental Commission meets of each month. A complete app'licat'ion form and (as descnibed above) must be subrnitted a minjmum PEC public hearing. No incomplete applications adm'inistrator) will be accepted by the planning nated submittal date- on the 2nd and 4th Mondays all accompanying material of 4 weeks prior to the date of the (as determined by the zoning staff before or after the desig- 75 soulh lronlage road Yall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 February 26, 1987 oftlcc of communlly developmenl Mr. Tin Drisko 325 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Lot l-8, Block 7, VaiI Valley First Filing Dear Tim: f recently received an inquiry concerning the location of your new garage. As you know, a variance was granted to allow construction within 5 feet 9 inches from the property line. A visual inspection by myself and cary Murrain l-ead us to believe the glarage is closer to the property line than perrnitted by this variance. It is standard practice to require a property irnprovement survey for any new construction in VaiL. This is to ensure that the structure is sited where originally approved. Our department has rrred-taggedrr this project until such time that an improvement survey is subnitted verifying the location of your garage. The rrred-tagrr prohibits any further construction on this project. It will be lifted after it is demonstrated to us that the garage is within the setback variance. Please subnit the irnprovenent survey as soon as possible so as to resolve this natter. Thank you for your cooperation. Please do not hesitate to contact ne with any questions you nay have. S incerely, r'^,zt\^""* AI ),6r,- Thonas A. Braun Senior Pfanner TAB: bpr cc: Bob Benedict Robert & Marv Drisko 75 souih tronlage road vall, colorado 81657 (30s) 476-7000 February 26, 1987 Ms. Margaret Gillin 765 Park Avenue New York City, New York 10021- offlce of communlty devclopment Re: Lot l-8, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing Dear Ms. GiIIin: I had an opportunity to inspect the Drisko garage this past week.It was the irnpression of nyself and our Building official that as constructed, the garage appears to be encroaching into the required side setback. As you may reca1l frorn our phone conversation, the Planning and Environnental Co:nmission approved a vari-ance on September 8, l-986 to a1l-ow the garage to be located within 5 feet, 9 inches of the property line. The Town of Vail Building Department has issued a rrred tagrt on this property. This action prohibits any further construction until a property improvement survey is submitted to our department to verify the precise location of the garage. Decisions on any further action by the Town wil-I be rnade following the confirmation of the garagets location as provided by the improvement survey. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have. S incernely, ,/Nt *^ &ttn-.-- Thomas A.. Braun Senior Planner TAB: bpr Project Application "\ Project Name: Proiect Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner. Address and Phone:-'-1- , . -''-l? i -'* .: Architect, Address and Phone: ption: Lot /f alo.x Filing JJ -A Legal D€scri Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: DISAPPROVAL Summary: E Statr Approval / PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION September 8, 1986 PRESENT bTEifrl-donovan Bryan Hobbs Pam Hopkins Duane Piper Si d Schu'l tz Jim Viele ABSENT FEllfosterfoss STAFF PRESENT Peter Patten Tom Braun Rick Pylman Betsy Rosolack Before the meeting, the board visited the Benkelman and Drisko sites. The meeting was called to order by Duane piper, cha.i rman, at 3:00 pM. l. Approval of mjnutes of August 25, l986. Jim viele moved and Diana Donovan seconded to approve the minutes. The vote was 6-0 in favor. 2.Reouest for a front se ack variance in order construct an addi on Lot 1 orn 4 ti on. can }Jilliam Benkel ma iele moved and bs seconded to ove the ddition oer the staff nemo ana novan votin aqal nsE aDDrova 3.Requ {ront and side setback varianc in order construct two eo rst ant: Rick Pylman explained the request. "fre said that originally the proposal would have required a setback variance from a stream, but ihe proposal'was changed and. moved away from the stream setback. The staff recommended approval oi the setback variance due to the configuration of the |ot. peter Looms, architect for the addition, expla'ined that no trees were being removed and that the second floor only intruded s1 ightly into the front setback. Donovan asked why the addition was not connected more strongly to the house and was told that there were windows which interfered. She felt strongly that the addition cou'l d have been des'i gned within the setbacks. Tom-Braun presented the proposal and showed a site p1an. The garage encroached 10 feet into the nequired 20 foot front setback, and 9 feet jnlo t[e requirea 15 foot side setback. Braun felt that existing vegetation between this lot and the neighbor would offset any potential impacts from the construction.Further, hjstorical 1y, the staff has been very supportive of variance requests for garage additions. He mentioned that there was still needed a tjtle report and a sign off by the utility companies concerning the 10 foot utility easement. Braun stated that the staff recommended approval and that iwo conditjons of approval were the sign-off of the ut'i lity companies and that the smaller of two pine trees was to be saved.i f possible. Hobbs seconded ove ano ln Bob Benedict, the site with the roots. nepresenting the a Iocal nursery owners, stated that he to see what trees could had arranged a neeting on be saved without damaging uest f a hei t vari ]n o r to ip5tall a satel|jte recei on Ene a't I Po I Ce Sou ronta e Koa Appl i can!:Town of Vai I at Tom Braun explained that the police Department needed the radio antenna in order to function properly. curt Ufkes, chief of police, stated that the Police Department had not installed the antenna, but were anxious to do so.Diana Donovan suggested the antenna be painted io match the building (to be suggested to the DRB). She stated that she would not approve the antenna for a residence, but since this was for public safety reasons,'she would "pprou" ihe-request. 5.Reouest I v Greenbe ani[ Natural Soace zoning to an rce r o and located on the North Fronta e Roa and bonded on two sldes B rea n Applic4lt: Town o Peter Patten explained that there had been a change in process. The Town would renove their proposal to zone the property, and the owner will request to - - receive zoning and a mjnor subdivision. The applicant planned to request Parking zoning and have a parking lot for 10-11 cars. It was announced that there would be a joint meeting with the Town Council on September 30 concerning the Vail Vil'lage Master plan. The review of the Land Use P'f an is scheduled for Septenber 22. Diana Donovan asked .i f the pEC could receive copies of the Land use Plan by the Friday before the meeting, and was told copies would be delivered then, unless changes were made at a ieeting on the l8th. Duane Piper reported that at the last DRB meeting, the DRB denied unconnected primary/secondary un.its. This was to be appealed at meeting on September 16, with a possible change to the ordinance.asking the CounciI for guidelines. a design for the Counci I The DRB is pec 9/8/86 -2- Legal Description: 0vrner He i ght Total GRFA Primary GRFA 7o;il' ( tit cK for SFR, R, R P/S TOIIE DISTRICTS 5e Lot // 8 Block 7 Fi.lins Archi tect Zone Distri * t, proposed u Lot Size *; Proposed J 6ao 1:L' -d1o,v, -t' Secondary GRFA Setbacks: Front Sides 20' l5' Rea r l'later Course 15' (30) (so) S'i te Coverage Landscapi ng Parhing Credi ts: Garage l.lechanical Ai rl ock S^uorage Solar Heat Storage Dri ve: Sl ope per"-ri tted Env i ronmen ta i /Ha za rds : (300) (600) (e00)(1200) (so)(roo) (2s) (so) (2oo) (4oo) 5a t< /so Sl ope Actual Ava'l anche F] ood Plain S'i ope Co;;:nts: Zoni ng: Approved,rDi s:ppror.ed \r , ..\ {'-tt 'l e( '\-F \ .l DaLe. 1? t6 /) tUldrln' Le"t ttf F,rrfa n e,i fu.rt6srgl,lz L {^(((a x,\+a t J-".J [''Itst" €.,3JS firrs7 p ,/rt/l/ ,r9lir< ? /eo I 7 ()u /t* AilJt". € 7J1 2"rolLanr, Su,le .53, D'.[[os,Tr ) ss3r' ta/ rf I 7 Uu/'* Hr,nn. Lof t't B 7 UU /'r CJose- 18i.{ S'.Fai'Nax /-,ane, Lilll'J*,(olo. fo \ J I J. u tJ z'J z ?o //illerrs+lu(", CAalFo"\?unn. tF?t1 ,JU3-J 3eto, Jo',| ,cJo' qGs-l ,t/ ef'l R hd by,^ Lol f , R: Nill'urusor-,: BoK 7+(q (q-kY*-* o and TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLI CANT: Pl anni ng Envi ronmental Commission Community Development Department September 8, .|986 A request for front and side setback variances in order to construct a garage at 325 Forest Road, Lot 18, Block 7, Vai'l Village lst Filing. Tim Drisko d ree to whi rel ief from the literal interoretati oTa ec r r] eo requ ation is n essar acn I eve treatment e vicinit to attain the pr'rvr Iege, I.DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED As proposed, the garage encroaches 10 feet'i nto the required 20 foot front setback, and 9 feet into the required 15 foot side setback. The garage has been sited in this location for a number of reasons. Foremost among these is the 15 foot grade change from Forest Road to the buildable area of the lot. A second consideration 'is that there is development potential for a secondary unit on this lot. The locatjon of the proposed garage would pose the fewest problems with the future siting of an additional unit. A final consideration jn the locatjon of the garage is the existence of a driveway bed leading to the property,s parking area. Thi s existing driveway would serve as access to the proposed garage. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS on of Criteri Fi ndi n Secti on .|8.62.of the Munici e recommen at o reo ue s act0rs l II. Consideration of Factors: The proposed garage addjtion is only 6 feet from the property'l jne that separates lot 18 frorn lot 20. It is felt that existing vegetation between these two lots will offset any potential impacts from this construction. l,lhile the structure is located only 10 feet from the front property 1ine, it is 23 feet from the exi sting edge line of Forest Road. enTor The proposed location minimizing impacts on been very supportive of the garage is reasonable with respect to adjacent properties. Historically, the staff has of vari ance requests for garage additions. This is particular'ly true in the Forest Road area because of existing road alignments and topographjcal constraints jn the neighborhood. To approve this request would be consistent with previously approved variances and would not be a grant of special privi lege. The effect of th oDu lal t on trans rtat and tra es and ti es There are no significant effects on any of the above mentioned factors. RELATED POLICIES IN VAIL'S COTWUNITY ACTION PLAN. Two goals outlined in the Community Action Plan relate to upgrading and improving properties throughout the Town of Vai'l . It is felt that th.i s garage addition would provide a fine improvement to this property. d vari ance on I t and air bution of III. IV. V. SUCH OTHER FACTORS AND CRITERIA AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCE. FI NDINGS e: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of spec.ial privilege inconsistent with the l imitations on other properties classified in the same district- That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or material'ly injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: The strict or 'l iteral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regu'l ation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physica1 hardship inconsistent wjth the objectives of this title. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditjons applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the appl icant of privi leges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. -2-9/8/86 PEC VI. STAFF RECOIDIENDATIONS staff recormendation for this request is approval , The Department has traditional 1y encouraged the development of garages and supports this proposal . Any impacts resulting from the setback encroachments are negligib'le and are far outweighed by the benefits of the garage addi ti on. Lt***^) -3-9/8/86 PEC \>: t-:IL -\+r :fr -(*.t'-' t\ \-) d i/t\ N E (*) $ Su KF a,ql ol0 N .....'-..-..- t$. -: tJ. b ss_ tgr z> $$ \ ova).*-,07 I f_1 s o $ N \t \$ e t I( J #$ zt Et SI 6!SI uIt z-t :f,Y I I t \ j DATE OF DRB MEETING: DRB APPLICATION *****THIS APPLICATION I^IILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED***** I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING: A pre-application meeting with a planning staff member is strong'ly suggested to ',,. determine if any additional informatjon is needed. No application wil1 be accepted unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator).It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointnent with the staff to find out about additional subm'ittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE applica- tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreas'ing the number of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must be resolved before a building permit is issued. A. pRoJEcr DEScRrpTroN, (bos/.r.t /ron ,, I J< /a "/ eJ hu, ' APPLICATION DATE: B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Address 3a S Fcs r cgl A J Legal Description L zon'r ng Lot iP Bl ock Filinq V, tr',/lqr. / t9 --_----1- C. NAME OF APPLICANT:Tm D.,t to Sa m€4)G57\telephone 4)6- aJ-l i I Addres s D. NAME OF Address E. NAME OF Coiu 4.16-6 (13 telephone 5Q t*a { F. DRB FEE: The fee w'i I I VALUATION $500,001 - $1,000,000 $ 0ver $1,000,000 be paid at the time a building FEE permit is requested. ..$ 0-$ 10,000 +$10,001 -$ 50,000 ' $.5o,oo1 - $ 15o,ooo $150,001 - $ ,500,000 IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: 1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the site to indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that will be removed should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the site. 2. The review process for NEli BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetings of the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approvai. 3. People who fail to appear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled meeting and who have not asked for a postponement wil l be required to be republ i shed. APPLICANT,S REPRESENTATIVE: 6" S RENEJ,../ Fc StP /uo-&teso tel ephone L,s Si gnature Address Say -< 4. The following items They, ftowever, have no to longer have to be presented to the Design Review Board. be presented to the Zoning Administrator for approval: a. Windows, skylights and simi'lar exterior changes that do not alter the existing plane of the building; and b. Building additions that are not viewed from any other lot or pub'lic space, which have had letters submitted from adioining property owners approvlng i the additfon; and/or approval from the agent for, or manager of a condominlum associ ati on . ' rr'l 5. You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You should check with a Town P'lanner before prroceeding at MME.OF PROJECT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PR o LIST OF MATERIALS Oris to Ca ra The following information is required for submittal Board before a final approval can be fiven: A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL Roof Si di ng Other Wall Materials ,/Ceclar Sriarte> by the app'licant to the Design Review COLOR fl<u/na/ Fasci a Soffi ts t,li ndows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails t Fl ues Fl ashi ngs Ch'imneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses 0ther Pa)ri €nu,J. P, n , r -d B.LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer: phone: PLANT MATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES Botanical Name Common Name EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED for conifers. (over) i?p ,, a,laurte/ rus/, /)rs n € /)<',et (, )cio<t tt (-c da r nouJ /nneJ fl,i/ {:.oJ- 4"n S./J F/u s /, ,6)" / z Quani ty Si ze* *lndicate caliper for deciducious trees. Indicate height , PLANT MATERIALS: (con't) SHRUBS EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED GROUND COVERS o Botanical Name Tvpe Si ze o SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL C. 0THER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, sw'imming pools, etc.) Please specify. Square Footage s0Q t!f" IITILIfi LOCATION VERIFICATION tlF SUBDIVISION JOB NAME Lor t8 l ocr_f__.-_=_.r r l r NG /t* ADDRESs SJ .f Fo r cs* 2J The location of utilities, whether they lines, nust be approved and verified by accompanying site plan. be nain trunk the following lines or proposed utilities for the Date Mountain Bel l I -634-3778 Western Slope Gas Harry Moyes Public Service Company Gary Hal I '*Holy Cross El ectri c Assoc. Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Vail Cable T.V. Gary Johnson Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation D'iscrict David Krenek * For new cons' p1 ease fill ou' attached sheet NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut pernit fron the Town of Vai1, Department. of Public Works and to obtain utility locations before digging in any public right- of-way or easenent in the Town of Vail. .d building pernit is not a street cut perrnit. A street cut pernit nust be obtained separately. This form is to verify service availablity and location. This should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. Authori zed PUBLIC NOTICE N0TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the p'lanning Commission of the Town of Vail will ho] d accordance with Section .|8.66.060 of the of Vail on September 8, 1986 at 3:00 pM chambers in the Vail Municipal Build.i n9. Consideration of: and Environmenta'l a public hearing in municipal code of the Town in the Town Council l. Request for front and side setback variances in order to construct a two story garage and storage on Lot lg, Block 7,Vai1 Vi'lIage First FiIing. Applicant: Tom Drisko 2- Request for a height variance in order to install a satellite dish on the Vail Police Department area of the Vail Municipal Building at 75 South Frontage Road. Appl i cant: Vai l Pol ice Department The applications and information about the proposars are available in the zoning administrator's office during regular office hours for public inspection. TOI^,N OF VAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THOMAS A. BRAUN Zoning Administrator Published in the Vail Trail August ZZ, 1986. ,.)u-a/-/ r/,,/rt c 'aZ -'A Z 174 ,4 Z?'42 )&;5'*a \oo APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE pnocedure is required for any project not be accepted until all informaiion oa Application Date 6l ll | [ b PEC I'IEETING DATE I. ,l This vrlll A. requesting a variance.is submitted.The appl ication NAME oF APPLT}ANT 4b _2"n4o ADDRESS orsxr ?z-a)p e((,ec B.) 16c::a YZ-S2JI Hone REPRESENTATIVE N /]t\NAME OF APPLICANT'S ADDRESS PHONE c.NAME 0F 0WNER(S) (type or prin - /--___-__-_.J-,,Sionatrrrp(q'l u 4 ^- ADDRESS _puorc /2/-JJ4Qo{f,e D. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL E. FEE $100 THE FEE MUST BE YOUR PROPOSAL. F. A I ist of the names INCLUDING PROPERTY THE APPLICANT l,lILL 4)6,-823t Ao,-s PNoful-fu_c* #U3e ,oo, -7-^ Di,Lo PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT liILL ACCEPT _of owners of al I property EEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS: BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECf adjacent to the subject property and their mailinq addresses. MAILING AODRESSES. II. ILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR CONOITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING E:^_ALL CONDTTTONS 0F AppR0vAL MUST Bi ISSUED. j i ,, FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NITURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEM'IIT MUST NLSO NOONIii':'" l' The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures jn the vicinity. III. F Vari ance Qlz- .l , ''3. The effect'of the variance on light and air, distribution of population, traniportation, traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. B. A topographic and/or improvement survey at a scale of at least l" - Z0' stamped by'a Colorado licensed surveyor including locations of all existinq imorove-ments, inc'luding grades and elevations. Other elements which must-be ihown are parking and loading areas, ingress and egress, landscpped areas and utility and dra'inage features. C. A site plan at a buildings. scale of at least l" = 20' showing existing and proposed F. If the proposal is located jn a mu'l ti*fam'i 1y deve'l opment which has a homeorri,erst association, then written approval from the associatjon in support of the proje'ct must be received by a duly authorized agent for said association. G. Any additiona'l material necessary for the review determined by the zoning admjnistrator.. * For interior modifications, an improvement survey waived by the zoning administrator. D. A1l prellminary building elevations the dimensions' general appearance,existing and proposed on the site. E. A preliminary title report to verify ownership Time Requirments The Planning and Environmental Commission meets of each month. A complete application form and (as described above) must be submitted a minimum PEC publ ic hearing. No incomplete appl ications administrator) will be accepted by the planning nated submittal date. and floor plans sufficient to indicate scale and use of all buildings and spaces ri ano easements I of the application as and site plan may be on the 2nd and 4th Mondays a'l I accompany'i ng materi a1 of 4 weeks orior to the date of (as determined by the zoning staff before or after the desiq- IV. the I'-r .L A.N N ' ' ,OU -'CUARANTF.E. Represerrtins fit le fnsuFan(e C:ompa.nv c,f l"linnesota THANH: Yllr_r r-UR yr_l-tH llfttrFH 5e pt enrbe r 03, L'lrrr.tJrder.: BUYER: SELLER: ABNRESS! 1986 v?56d RI,EF-RT M"URISk:il arrd I'IAHY ELl ZAEETH BHl,'jIiO ,O"pANJ FRIIJIJE 5'TREE] REAL ESTATE ?*6 lRIf'LlE 5-r. VA)t{-, rlr--r. 816F-,7 W Attn: TIH trRIF-;Htl COMMITMENT TO INSURE This commitment was produced and issued through the office of LAND TITLE GUARANTEE C(IMPAIIY 108 South Fronrage Road P.O. Box 357 Vail, CO 81658 t3031 476-2251 Representing: Jrru lrusunnruce fiorvreaNv or ffitur.rEsorA ^r?letceS vrosrNN!|1ll ro ^NVdwoJ :roNvdnsNl rurl 'A:oleuErs pezlroqln? roqlo Jo racg3o 8ur1ep1p,r e ,{q peu8lsraiunor ueqm prle^ aq ol 'V alnpoqrs uI u,$oqs olep oql uo sroruJo pozuoqtn? Iynp s1t ,{q pexgge oluneroq aq 01 lees pue otueu aterodroc sll pasn?r s?q ?losouuq4l;o fueduro3 acuBrnsul olllJ 'COSUAHA\ SS1INIIA\ NI 'luautruuoJ srql [q pere,roc uoe.reql a8e8lrour ro lsorolur ro alelso aql anle^ JoJ ptocer;o so:rnbce pernsur pasodord aqt alep aql 01 roud 1nq Joeroq elep oArlcoJJo eql ol luanbesqns 3ur-qce11e ro sprorer cqqnd aql ur Surreaddz lsru 'polearc 'fue JI 'srolleur rorllo Jo sr.urcIc osJo^pe 'setueJqurnrua.'suell 'slJoJaC 'S 'spJocoj Jllqno 0rll q ux\oqs lou pue ^\E[,(q pesodurr'paqsrurn; reu?eleq Jo eloJolareql ppal?u Jo loq?[ 'seclues JoJ 'ual[ e ol lq€F ro 'ue11 fuy 't 'sprocer c11qnd eqt ,(q urnoqs lou ore qcrql\ pue esolosrp p1no,n sesrure:d eql3o uottcedsur puu {a,rrns lJorJoc B qcq t slcuJ Iue pue 'sluourqceorcua 'eerz ut e8elroqs 'seurl fJBpunoq ut slclguoJ 'senuedercstq '€ 'sproce: c11qnd eql fq u.roqs lou'sluetuoseo Jo srurelt ro 'stueuaseg '? 'sprocer ctlqnd aqt ,{q u,ttor.1s 1ou uotssossod ut satlred 3o srutelc ro qq8ry 'I :ButtrolJo3 ar{l ol lcafqns osle st luoullulruoC sFIl 'ol peJraJal a,roqe e8era,ro3 uo{ suorsnloxA pue suotlelndgtg pu? suol}IpuoJ ar{l uI pauleluoc srolleru aql ol uollrppe ul SNOIId:13X3 OUVONVIS 'luarulrurruoC sr$ 3o suorsnord aql ol polqns arz pu? uo peseq eq Nnru luorulFrruroJ sJrll fq para,roc uoareql ateEgoul eql Jo snlets eql ro lseralul ro alBNa erit ol allll eql Jo snlB$ eql Jo lno EursFe {ueduro3 eW NqEE? Sulrq ,(eru ro aezq {eur parnsul pasodord eqt l?ql uollJ? Jo s1q3F ro suoltf,a ro uotlce Iuy 'V 'uraraq peurpour ,(Jssardxa su ldacxs tueurlruluoC slll Jo lr?d ? apBru pus eoueroJar Iq palurod.rocut ,tqaraq en qt1{a pamsul pasodord eql Jo !o^sJ nt roJ pal}lur -uloc sarcglod :o ,{iqod 3o ruroJ or{l Jo atero,ro3 urou suoFnlrxo aql pu? suoll?Fdpg pue suotllpuoC el{l pue suotst^ord Ernmsur eql ol loaiqns sr {1-q1quJ1 qcns pup roJ pallrruuoc salcrrod ro ^crtod aql roJ v elnpaqrs u! pelsls lunoue eql peacxa {lt1qeq qcns 1pqs luela ou uJ'lueullluruoJ slr{l {q paJa oc uooJarll etetlJour Jo tsare}rq ro el?lse aql elserc ro attnbce o1 (c) .to 'g aFpeqos 14 u,noqs suo4daf,xe alpulrqla ol (q) ro goaraq sluaura4nbar aql qtl/$ {lduroc og (e) qtp.l poot ut Suqeltapun ur uoareq etuBll -ar u porJnrur ssoJ [Enl]B ro3 {1uo pu? roJ pallruuroc salcrJod ro ,(c11od Jo uuoJ aql uI pornsul Jo uounfi.Jep aql repun pepnlo -ur sarlnd r{ons pu? pernsuy paodord pauruu aq1 o1 ,{Juo aq llBqs }ueu4rruuroC slqt repun ,{uedu:o3 oql Jo IUtqErl 'E 'suor1eJnd119 pu? suorlrpuoJ e6oql Jo € qdertered ol luensrnd perrncur fpnopard flqrqeq uro.r3 firedruo3 aql e ellor lou lprls luerupuou? qrns lnq ',(l8uproccu lueruulutuoC slql Jo I otnpaqts puaue Ieu uoqdo slr 1z {ueduro3 eql'ralleiu rarpo ro rurBIJ a6Je pB 'aJueJqurnJua 'ua.q 'tJaJap qcns {uu go e3pa1,tou1 pnlce sartnbce asln -raq1o ,{ueduro3 oqt JI ro '^updruoC eq} ol a8pal,nou4 qcns osolcslp IIBqs parnsul pesodord aqr g1 'atpel,noul qcns asolrslp os ol pe.rnsul pasodord aql Jo a.rn;p; fq pacrpnferd sr fwduro3 aql luelxa arll ol uoareq aJuEJIer Jo 1re fur ruor3 Eulllnsar aEeuep ro ssol ,{uz.ro1 ,{111qu11 ruou pa^a[or aq leqs findu:oJ aql'8ullu,$ u1 ,{uedu.ro3 eql ol e8pel^roul1 gons esol3slp ot IIEJ llBqs pue 'Joareq g olnpeqcs u! rraoqs e6oql ucql leqlo lueullunuo3 s511 {q pare oJ uoeragl e8etlrour ro lsaralut ro olelsa aql 8ullJeJJE ralleu raqlo ro u4BIc asre pE 'acu?rqruncua 'uall '1ceJap {uu ;o a! pel,nou)1 pnlce sarrnbcu ro seq Pemsul pasodord aqt 31 '7 'luaulnllsu! IlFncas raqlo ro 'poap lsnll 'lsnll Jo paap epnltu-r ller{s 'ulareq pasn uaq,n '..atu81rou,, uret eql ' l sNorrvr ndrls oNV sNorIroNoS ',(ueduro3 6qr Jo IFBJ orll lou sI selJJlod ro ,{oqod r{rns anssr ol arnlrq eql }?ql pappord 'srncco lsllJ ro^eqrlqr{ 'enssl [?qs JoJ pellnuuor sarcllod ro fcrtod aql ueqr$ Jo JooJoq elup eAIlJeJJo orn raUE sr{luoru xF eleuTrrrral puu oseeo lpqs ropuneroq suotl -et1qo pue firpqeyl p pue eJueJnsr4 alUl Jo senlod ro {cJ1od qcns Jo oJuenss! eql ol ,Oeuunlard sr tueurlgruroC slrlf, 'luotuesolopua luenbxqns ,(q ro luaulnuuoC srql Jo eru?nssr arp Jo ourrf oqt ls reque 'ftnduo3 aql {q goaraq V aFpeI{oS q peuesul uaaq e eq roJ pallunuor sarcl;od ro {cqod aql .;o lunouB ar{l pu8 pamsul pasodord eql Jo ^llluepr aql uaqa fluo e IrcaJJa aq IFqs luotulluuloJ sIq.L joaraq suoqelndls puz suortpuoJ eql ol pu? I pus V salnpoqrs.;o suorsprord eql o1 lcafqns ? :roJeraql saEreqc pue surnruro:d oql Jo lueurfBd uodn 'y elnpel{ts ut ol porJEar io paqrrcsap puel eql ur {qaraq pararroo lsara}u ro alBtsa aqt;o aa8eEl.rou.r .to lou^ro s? 'V alnpaqrs u! peueu pamsu; pasodord aql Jo lo^eJ q 'V olnpeqcs w peunuapr sE 'ocuprnsur alllt Jo soJtllod ro ,{ct1od slr enssl ol stnuuoc fqateq 'uolleraplsuoc elqenp^ e.rog'fwduro3 aW pal1er ularaq 'uotlerodror ?tosauul4l ?'VIOS1INNII{ gO ANV4I4IOJ 1ICNW1SNI g"II[ eloseuu!w's!lodeeuulw lo Aueduoc lcols e vrosrNNr[lf ro ^Nvd^ol icNvunsrul rul '^au 0461 'lNf 1|l|lttiloc Nolrvlcossv 3'llll oNv'l NvSlu3hlv Af/Z ZASZ luroJ lttf riuroOoH14rrHENr StrHEI'UI-E A Application No. V9558 , For Infonmation Onlv - Charees -Lenden Pol icv _-TOTAL-- ' l.f lth vour nenrittance .elease Fefer to V9H6B. 1. Effective Dete: Aueust 25, 19g6 at g:OO A,H. 2. Policv to be issued, and proposed fnsured: 'ALfA[ Loan Policv l97O Revision. Proeosed I nsuFed ! 3. The estate or interest in the land described or refenred to in this Commito€nt and covered herein isr A Fee 4. 'l'itle to the estate on intenest covered henein is at th€effcctive date hereof vested in: ROtsERT l.t. ERI*K0 a.nd l{ARy ELIZABETH DfiISKO 5. The land neferred to in this commitment is described as f ol I oros: Lot l8' Block 7' VAIL VILLAGE FIRsr FTLINE, AccoRtrING To rHE REC0RDED FLAT THERE0F' couNTy oF EAGLE, srATE oF coLoRAFcr. PAGE 1 nr-roOoHMrrHENr SCHEOUI-E B-1 (Requirenents) Aprrlication No. V9S6A The follouins ane the cequirementg to be compli€d urithr 1. Pavment to cr. for the account o€ the erantors on ftorteagors of the ful I consideration for the estate on interest to be insured. ?. Pnoper' instrurnEnt(s) creatine the estate or irrterest to be insured must be executed and dulv filed for record, to-urit: THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE RF:EUIRES RETURN ADDR€SSES ON DOCUT.IENTS SENT FOR RECOREING!I PAGE 2 A L r oC tr il H r r r,,f E N r O . sC:r{EUilLE E_: (Exceetic,ns) Appl icatiorr Nr-,. V?5&B The policv or poficies to he issued urill cantain exceptions tn the f ol I auring urrless the same ar.e disposed of ta the satisfactiorr af the Companv: 1. Standar'd Exceptions I thr.c,rish F printed crr the ccver sheet. 6. 'raxes and assegsments nc,t vet due on payable and speciar assessments nat vet certified ta the Tr.easrrrer.., s affice. 7. Any unpaid taxes oF assessments asarnst said land. A. Liens fDr. unFaid ulaten and seuer char.pes, if an.r. 9. RItiHT OF PRfiPRIETOR CIF A VEIN CIR LETIE TE EXTRAIT ANTI REI"ICIVE HIs GRE .I.HEREFROI"I SHOLTLN THE SAHE EE FI:IUNLI Tff PENETF(A.I-E oR IIITERSECT THE PREMI$E$AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECCTRITEIT September. O4, !9?3, IN BCTCTH 9g AI PAGE ?8. 10. RIGH'I- OF I.IAY FBR DITtrHES OR trANAI-G CONSTRU|]TEB BY THE AUTHORITY EIF THE UNITEfI S'TATES A5 RESERVEN IN UNII'ETI STATES PATENT RECfiRTtEfI SEPtEMbEN O4,19?3, IN BNOK P3 AT PAGE PE. 11. REBTRICTIVE TIBVENAN]s l,lHIr:H nE Nfrt trLrNTAIN A FTJRFET]uRE ok RHvERIER cLAUsE,BUI OFII TTING RESTRIL..TIIINS, IF ANY, HASEEI LIN RAL]E, cI]LLiR, RELILiIcIN, gR NATIONAL I:IHIGIN' AIJ I]ONTAINEN IN INSI'RUHENT REE:LIRUHE AUSUST 1O, L?6?, IN ECIOK I74 AT PAGE 17P. 1?. UTILI]'Y EASEI,IEN'T TEN FEET IN ].'IE'IH ALONG THE I",EST" NflRTH ANE EAST LOI- LINES oF SUBJECT FRCTPF:RTY AS sHol.JN oN THE REc:ctRIrEE pLAT crF VAIL VILLAGE, FIR$T FILINE.