HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 6 BLOCK 1 LOT 12 LEGAL.pdf,/afu2, gK/t
(/" t/i/,yt ah
AL,L
sEatus...: IssttED Applied..: 07/2L/1999 Issued...: 07/2L/1999 Expires..: 0L/17/2000
Phone: 303-355-6000 co, EXTENSTON 0 80205
Phone: 303-355-6000 co, ExrENsroN 0 80206
1OO GARFIEI-,D ST 4TH FL, DETWER CO 8
Descript.ion:ENLARGING BATHROOM Nudber of Dwellj-ng Unit.s: 001
Town of Vail Adjusted ValuaEion: 10,000
Fireplace InforBatsion: Re€tricted:*of Saa ApplienceB:#of Gas Loga:fOf, tlood/PalleE:
FEE SWMARY
Building----->
Plan Check- - - >
Inve6tigation>
will call---->
TOVIII OF VAIL
75 S. FRO}CTAGE ROAD
vArr.,, co 9L657
970-479-2L38
NOTE:
DEPARTI.4EI{'T OF COMMI]NITY DEVELOPME}IT
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON ,IOBSITE AT
PRO.]EET TITLE: STEPHENSON REMODEI,
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT PCTMiT
TIMES
899 - 0190 #:
Eion. . . :el No..:
Reetualant Plan Revi6r,r- - >
DRB Fec-- ------
Recreaciorl Fee- -_----- >
CLean-t p Deposit-------->
TOTAI, FEES-.-- -
Total Cal.culatscd Fees--->
Additsional FeeE-- ------->
Total Permil Fee- ------->
PalmentB--------
BAI,ANCE DUE--.-
Address:755 FOREST RD
756 FOREST RD
2L0L-072-LL-01.2
ect No.: PR'J99-0211
APPIJICAIiIT STEPHENSON, TONI
1OO GARFIELD STREET, DEIiMER,
CON:TRACTOR STEPHENSON, TONI
1OO GARFIELD STREET, DEM/ER,
O$INER GENERAL COMMI]NICATIONS INC
ATTN: A EMMET STEPHENSON JR,
145.00
94.28
.00
3 .00
.00
20 .oo
.00
100.00
.00
352.25
Itrem: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
07/2L/L999 JRM Actsion: APPR
ItsCM: O54OO PLANNING DEPARTIVIENT
o7/2L/t999 ,JRM Actsion: APPR
ItsCM: 05600 FIRE DEPARTME}fT
o7/2L/L999 .IRM AcEion: APPR
Itsem: 05500 PITBI-,IC hfORKS
07/2L/1,999 JRM Actsion: APPR
APPROVED
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dept:
JRM
Dept:
Dept:
Depts:
BUIIJDING Division:
PI,ANNING Division:
FIRE Division:
PllB WORK Division:
TOV/Comm. Dev.
Clean-up
approved
amount
date
* i j * r r * * * r * i * * * * r * * , * * * * , * r * * * * * , * * * * * * * t * * t * r*tt***r***t***
See Page 2 of this Document for any conditsions that may apply to Ehis permiL.
DECI,ARIITIONS
I hcreby acknowlcdEe thaE I have read thi. applicatsion, filled out in fuII the infoinaeion required, coEPleEed an accuratse Plot
plan, and atat'e chat all lhe infor ration providgd as r€quired ia corlec!. I agtee to conpl.y wl,th the informalion and PloC plan,
to comply *ich all Town ordinanccs and 6cate Ia$s, and tso build lhis gtsfuclure according tso tsha To!,n'6 zoning and subdiviBion
codeE, daaign rewiew approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinanceB of thc Town aPPlicable therelo.
REQUESTS TOR INSPEC:TIONS STIAIJIJ BE MADE T!{ENIY-FOUR HOT'RS IN ADVANCE BY
Ernd cl..n-up Drpo6i.t To: ToNI STEPHENSoN
it Refund
Proj
PAGE 2 ********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit. #: 899-0190 as of o7/2t/99 Status: ISSIIED ********************************************************************************
Permit T)l9e: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Applied: O7/21/L999 Applicant: STEPHENSON, TONI Issued: O7/2L/L999
Job Address: 756 FOREST RD
tocat,ion: 755 FOREST RD
Parcel No: 2101-072-LL-OL2
********************************************************************************
CONDTTIONS
******************************:l*************************************************
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND EVERY STORY
As pER SEC. 310 . 6 . r- OF TlrE 1997 UBe.
3. NO PLANS SI'BMITTED.FIELD INSPECIIONS TO VERFIY THAT ALL
BLDG,PLMB,AND ELEC EODES ARE MET
TOSIN OA VAII., COI,OR.EDO 9taucnElt
r * r tt * * * 'r * || r rl, * * * !| f| tt
362.25 o7l2L/99 14.26 8t.t.unl !|urrlbrr ! REC-05{2 ADounts:
Prtdant tlcthod: CK Notltlotr:r522,/3?EPHEfgO!t rnit: itN
P.TUIC NO: 899-0',90 D'PC ' }-B TIJD ADD,/N'T IIFR BUII'D P8
P.rc.I [o: 2LOL-O72-LL-OL2
gltr Adllr.rr ! 756 lOnBgT RI)
I6c.tlon: 756 TOREAT RD
lhla PayB.n!
Tottl Fcaa:
352.28 Total A&Ir Prss:
Balellce:
352.25
362.25
. oo
Account Cod.
BP O0100003111100
DR 001000031122 00
PF 00100003112300
ID D2.DEPOS
l{c 00100003112800
D€acrlption
BUILDINO PENfiIT FBBS
DEgIGIC RR'IBN PEEE
PIJ I CHACK IEES
CLEIIIUP DEPOSITS
WILL ETIJ'J IIISPECTTOII FEB
lDount
20.00
91.2s
100.00
3 .00
o
o
'F olt!o?JI
o
CB d8
3 &
IE
o
i.{
o
o
o
o
F
z o a 2 g
I
i'i r.|.l Hql
B8 HE
E|
IA OE r'ra !
F F It
v U E
o A
A
E B
o
al
o
E I{
E
o F
ts!
H
6
F
E !q
cl
H na
'r at E8 Er.FI
EH 6E
B A
E
q I
u qI
U
E
E
B g
BE LO E:
s H
lr Fl
EE
E9 arc
a
ir Fl
?F iI
vl o
E
HFI H2
Hg g4
II H
o
tr
!l
E
X H
6 H I H E&:B rE
E.s gx 6 e6 B 6'
c H
.l u I
FI r8
I
H c
E E
E
B
Fi
o o
e o
6
)e
:E!Hi:
EE r EO t
EE8
TowN oF vAfoNSTRUcroN pERMrr AilrcnnoN FoRM
INFORMATION MUST BE COMPLETE OR THN APPLICATION WILL BE REJECTEI)
//
Date: 7/7/7? Permit#
-
JobNzne: Eh?-qL-$.)'^ JobAddress:
nuildne(4 Plumbing ( )
Firins s,,adinirioo vthi lrlh{\buleil-2zou
Address: Phone#
Corrtact the Eagle Cour$ Assessors Office at 97G328-6640 for Parcel #
Parcel# 2lol- 07L- ll- ol2
Electrical ( )Mechanical ( )
Legal Description: Lot_Block
Architect:
ru{9f -sz-tl
Other ( )
f r-r
OwnersName: /Dd; F, JT<s66rrrr, /0a &*rtnt Sr rha.y'.,tet,Co.fuzofn*"*Eryf ss-l*a-x (
Description of Job kNt-
WorkClass: New ( ) Ntentton(l/ Additional( )
Number of Dwelling Units: /
Number and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances
Repair ( )Olher ( )
Number of Accommodation Units:
Gas Logs
BUILDING: $
VALUATIONS
I
ELECTRICAL: $ 4Mo
Wood/Pellet I
OTIIER: $ /Oaa
TOTAL $ /D NAD
CoNTRACTOR INFORMATTON . .;\
''- | \
Generaf Contractor: -lopt Jre pM n sot Address: tUez.rr ^a L / t /tAr-\W:v)
a AA ^. -a zsr@-
rownorVairRegstrationNo. lt1 - t--
^o "u AQQ 'Ol?o u"*'
PLUMBING $ 6OtD MECIIANICAL$
Electrical Contractor:
Town of Vail Resi
Plumbing Contractor:
Town of Vail Rcgisuation No.
Mechanical Contractor:
Town of Vail Resistration No.
Address:
Phone #
Address:
Phone #
FOR OFFICE USE rlUL g ? lges
BUILDING:
SIGNATURE:.
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT REFUND TO:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLY REGISTERED WTTH THE TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PI,JBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT
JANUARY I, I999
CONSTRUCTION PARKJNG AND MATERIAL STORAGE
CODE 5-2-10: ITEPOSITS ON PIJBLIC WAYS PROEIBITED
A. Unlawful deposits: Subject to subsection C thereoi it is unlawful for any person to litter,
track or deposit, or cause to be littered" tracked or deposited, san4 gravel, rocks, mud, dirt,
snow, ice, or any other debris or material upon any street sidewalk, alley or public place, or
any portion thereof.
B. Notice; Abatement: The Director of Public Works may notify and require any person who
violates or causes anotler to violate the provision of subsection A hereof, or who has in the
Director's employment a person who violates or causes another to violate the same, top
remove such sand" gravel, rocks, mu{ dirt snow, ice or any other debris or material within
twenty four (24) hours after receipt of said notice by the Director of Public Works. In the
event the person so notified does not comply with the notice within the period of time herein
specified, the Director of Public Works, or other authorized agent, may cause any such sand,
gravel, rocks, mud dirt, snow, ice, debris or any other material to be removed from any street
or alley at the expense ofthe notified.
C. Exceptions: The provisions of subsection A hereof shall not be applicable:
l. Within the immediate area of any construction, maintenancs or repair project of any
street or alley or of any water main, sewer main, electricity line, gas line, telephone line
or any appurtenance thereto;
2. To deposi* of sand, dirt or materials necess:ry for the protection of tho public safety; and
3. To public areas designated for the dumping or depositing of said materials.
D. Summons; Penalty: As an alternative to the notice for removal provided in subsection B
above, any
person who violates or causes another to violate the same, may be issued a summons to
appear before the Municipal Court of the Town for said violations, and upon being found
guilty ofa violation hereunder be punished as provided in Section l4-l ofthis code.
E. Notice; Penalty: It is unlawful for any person to fail or refuse to comply with the notice of
the
Director of Public Works as prwided in subsection B hereof, and any such person shall, in
addition to payment of the expense of removal incurred by the Director of Public Works, as
provided in subsection B hereo{ upon being found guilty ofa violation hereunder, be
punishable as provided in section l-4-l ofthis code. (1997 code: ordinance 6 (1979)
Read and acknowledged by:
Position or Relationship to Project:
Date:
(i.e. conuactor or owner)
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road.
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME F"RAME
If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works)
review and approval, a Planning Deparhnsnt review of Health Department review, and a review
by the Building Deparfrnent, the estimated time for a total review may take as long as three (3)
weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits will have to follow thc above
mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount of '
time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
depadments with regard to necessary review, these projects may also take the three (3) week
period.
Every attempt will be made by this departnent to expedite this permit as soon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the Plan Check procedure and time frame. I also understand that if
the permit is not picked up by the expiration date, that I must still pay the Plan Check Fee and
that if I fail to do so it may affect future permits that I apply for.
Agreed to by:
ProjectName: 7,<A ;&rr*
-
'
o*", 7/y'42
Work Sheet was tumed into the Community Development Dept
€punuo"*
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PI]BLIC WORKS
JANUARY I, 1999
WHEN A ?IJBLIC WAY PERMIT: IS REQUIRED
J.
IoBNAME: 7,4 1tu* &..-4
DArE: Z/z /qA
-
PLEASE ANSWER TFIE FOLLOWiNG QTIESTIONNAIRE REGARDING TIIE NEED FOR A
"PUBLIC WAY PERMIT':
1. Is this a new residence? YES NO
Is demolition work being performed that rcquires the use of the Right+f-Way, easements or
public property? YES
Is any utility work needcd?
No-rz-
YES NO I,/
4. Is the driveway being repaved?YES NO u,'-
6.
8.
Is a different access needed to the site other than the existing driveway? YES NO,/
Is any drainage work being
YES NO 1,/
done that afiects the Right-of-Way, easements, or public property?
Is a "Revocable Right-of-Way Permit" required? YES
A. Is the Right+f-Way, easements or public property to be used for stagry, parking or fencing?
YES NO /.
B. If NO to SA' is a paddng staging or fencing plan required by Community Development?
YES NO r,/
If you answered YES to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permit" must be obtained-
"Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Wort's office or at Coilmlmity
Development. If you have any questions please call Leonard Sandoval from Public Works at 479-2198.
I HAVE READ AND ANSWERED AIL TTIE ABOVE QUESTIONS.
v/
NO/
Company Name
l.
7
J.
4.
6.
7.
5.
PUBLIC WORKS PIRMIT PROCESS
How it relates to Buildine Permits
Fill out our check list provided with a Building Permit Annlication.
If yes was answered to any of the questions then a "Public Way" is required. You
can pick up an application at either Community Development, located at 75 South
Frontage Road or Public Works, Iocated at 1309 Vail Valley Drive.
Notice sign offs for utility companies. All utilities must field verify (locate)
respective utilities prior to signing application. Some utility companies require up
to 48 hours notice to schedule a locate.
A construction traffic controUstaging plan must be prepared on a separate sheet of
paper. An approved site plan may also be used. This plan will show locations of
all traffic control devices (signs, cones, etc.) and the work zone, (area of
Construction, Stagtng, etc.). This plan will expire on November lst and will need
to be resubmitted for approval through the winter.
Sketch of work being performed must be zubmitted indicating dimensions (lengtt\
width and depth of work). This may be drawn on the traffrc control plan or a site
plan for the job.
Submit completed application to the Public Work's office for review. If required,
locates will be scheduled for the Town of Vail Electricians and Irrigation crew.
The locates take place in the morning, but may require up to 48 hours to perform.
The Public Work's Construction Inspector will review the application and
approve or disapprove the permit. You will be contacted as to the status and any
requirements that may be needed. Most permits are released within 48 hours of
being received, but please allow up to one (1) week to process.
As soon as the permit is processed, a copy will be faxed to Community
Development allowing the'Building Permit" to be released. Please do not
confuse the "Public Way Permit" with a "Building Permit" which is to do work
on a project itself.
NOTE:
The above process is for work in a public way ONLY.
Public Way Permits are valid only until November 15ft.
A new Public Way Permit is required each year if work is not complete.
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD vAIt, co 8L657
970-479-2L38
DEPARTI',IE}{f OF COMMI]NITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTEr THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON ,JOBSITE AT ALL, TIMES
Permit. #: 899-0125 ELECTRICAIJ PERIVIIT
APPLIEANT
COI{TRAqTOR
OWNER
ST 4TH FL, DEN\IER CO 8
DescripEion: ELECfRICAL FOR BATII RBMODEL Valuatsion:4, 000 .00
'Job Address: 755 FOREST RD LocaEion...: 755 FoREsr RD
Parcel No.. : 2LOL-072-LL-0L2 Project No. : PR,J99-02LL
HUGHES & SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC P. O. BOX 3925, DTLLON, CO 80435
IIUGHES & SCHNEIDER EIJECTRIC P. O. BOX 3926, DrtLON, CO 80435
GENERAL COMMI]NICATIONS INC
ATIN: A EMMET STEPHENSON iIR, 100 GARFIELD
Status...: ISSI]ED Applied..: 07/2L/L999
Issued. .. z Lo/2!/L999
E>cpires. . : 04/L8/2000
Phone; 970-468-2404
Phone: 970-468-2404
Electsrical- - - >
DRB Fee
Inveatigation>
tlill call---->
TOTAL FEES-.. >
aotal calculated Pee6- - - >
Addibion.l P.cs--------->
Total Pertnic Fee-------->
Paymenla--------
72.OO
.00
.00
3 .00
75 .00
.oo
75 .00
75.O0
BAI,ANCE DUE.....
a*.rr*r**r*r**t**r***|r****rral,Jtt*tt**atf*tttt1******tttt*rr* *rr**l *1*lr***i*ta|,t*t tatttti*ttttttat+*
Item: 06000 BI-,ECIRICAJ, DEPARTI{ENI Depts: BUILDING Diwision:O7/2L/L999 iIRM ACt,iON: APPR APPROVED iIRI"T rtsb.m:'.05500 ErRE DEPARIT4ENT Dept: FrRE Division:o7/2L/L999 iIRM Action: APPR N/A
ttttt*rttl,*lllrttrttitrr*rtttrtt* ****** *** ***********aJtrt***t**ttt*rral*rt***f *i
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1 . FIEI,D INSPBETIONS ARE REQUIRED TO EHECK FOR CODE COMPI.IATiICE.
* * * * * t * a a a t t ', 'r t t t . t 'r
r r r i t i |, r t*
DECI,ARJATIONS
I hcreby acknorlcdgo th.c I hrvE r6ad this applicatlon, fllI.d ouf in full che infomatsion required, compl.sccd an accur.tc ltlot
plin, rnd aurCa tshats alL th. informaiion prowided ao required is correct. I egrc. Co couFLy ltibh lhe inforurtion and ploC plan,
uo co$pLy rlth .lI Toyn ordinrncc!.nd aCat. I.r.., and tso build lhig Euructurc according !o tshc Town'E zonlng rnd gubdLvL.Lon
codaa, daalgn r.wLes approvod, Unlforn Building codc and other oldinanc€s of tsha Town r![t].Lcabla thereco.
REQITESTA FOR lNgPBglIONg gHALl, BE I'A.DB fl{E!ITI-FOUR HOURS IN AD'i/ANCE BY TEIJEPHONA AT 479-2138 Ol tT OUR OFBICE fRoll gioo AIt 5:00 P
rotif or vru,, cotoR.rDo SCrCatrnE
gtrcnrt furb.r! R!C-o3?t lDunE:
Pq'[.ne tlcElrod! Cf, f,otaElon:
75.OO LOlZLl99 LO.A1
1506/UIXHIS & 6C tnlr. arf,
Pllois llo t 899-0125 tYp.: B-llllc BLgclRlClL PER!|IT
Prrc.l nor 2101-072-11-O1a
glcr lddr... r t56 lORlST RD
&ocrgion! 796 lORtSl RI)
Brlrnca! .00
tattirratt!tttrrl ta iarrrftt*trllia itt tt*ttt r, itril * tr rttl 'r *!l*l ir, * lt ttr t t t
Tohl taar !
7E.00 loErl ll.l. DtE !Tl|ia PrtDrng
lccounE coda lt lcrlptlon
75,00
75.00
lDount
72.OO
3.00
ID 0010000r111a00 El.Eel*rcl! PER$rT FEEA
llC 00100003112e00 tIDr, CtlJ. IIBPBCIId lll
Jtcl -(D8-99
86O So. Chrhson St. . Dcnwr, CO 80210
601 711-7839 . FAX (303) 741-960i
Jily8, 1999
Fritzlen Pierce Smith
1650 E. Vuil Valley Drive
Fallridge Silite C-l
Vail, CO 81657
Aun: Mn Dale Smith
Projecl Number: 982-5729
Suhject: Adam Residence Front Dormer
Dear Mr. Smith:
02z32P MARTIN DESIGN o
l\ tT r\ T)il-rTf '-
LY|.i\L\L.LL]
d"^JEn it c.
P.O2
,rn9
D*r*6
At the request of Brad Foster, a representalive rtr Boles Custom Builders, Martin Design
Inc. hus reviea,ed the revisions to the front dormer on the Adam residence localed al 706
Forest Road, Vail, Colorado. Based on the information thal v'as con'peyed to us by Mr.
Foster, the top nl the dormer wqs too high and needed to he lowered approximatelyfour
inches, in order lo meet the town o.f Vuils height requirements. The microlum ridge beam
and the rafiers were ripped per the enclosed sketch SK-2. This modificcttfun lo the raflers
and ridge heam is acceptahle by our ffice and is sulJicientfor the design load.s.
Please contacl this ffice ifwe may be of.further assistance.
Sincerely,
Martin Design, Inc.
Proiect Engineer
Cc: Boles Custom Builder.s Inc.
0105 L.lwadt Villagc Ccnrct. Saite t-204
P.O. Bor 2448 . Eduur&,CO 8f632
(970) 926'5045 ' I'Ax (97o) 926-57e2
,7+r=S
Breu T. Burnside
iJul-Ctg-99 02:33P MARTI1I DESIGN
-
-o P. 03
NIIA]RTM$
antMT\tMwlml
P,Ob21# Et*w4OOtI6tt
(970) 9r6501t FIX 8n) nGt7t2
@ ress MARnN oEsrc1l. rNc.
fhc usa of thcsc documcnl,3 6nd droringl sholl bc
restrictcd to the originol projcct for rhich thcy *ere
prcpored ond ony publlcotlon of thcs. docum€nts onct
sprcificotions is expressly limited to such project.
Re-use. raproduction or publicotion by ony method, in
wholc or in port. of thege document! ond drowing3 i9
prohibited. Title of thesr documentg ond drowings
rcmoint with MARTIN OESIGN, lNC.
MARTIN DESIGN. lNC. retoins oll federol,
stote ond common low copyrigh t protegtions.
17 U.S.C. section l0l ct s€o.
.s'_9{.1ffii/a;;7/p"2,
= / ;1./Lll./J/ ',
= X'.1 l%glDo -l .=
'":ffiff;;;;N
JIJ(,,O,i'g'
DATE: 7/6/9s FRorur Roor f)o("4FK'
DRAYIN 8Yr 8IB
ADAM RESIDENCE
LOT 9 BLOCK 1
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
FRITZLEN PIERCE SMITH
PRoJ. NO. 962-5729
SHEET NUMBER
3x-2
ffi6.i oclt 41999
Department of Conununity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
NOTIFICATION OF APPROVED PERMIT STATUS
CONITACION ET'GffiS & SCETEIDER ELEGTRIC
Address: P.O. BOX 3926. DIILON. CO 80435
Date Permit was applied for :712U99 Permit#: 899-O125
-o-Balance due:$75.00 Plan Check Fee:
Job address: 756 FOREST ROAI)
Owner: GEIiIERAT. cou TIriITcA'rroNs TNc - _
Job description: ELECITICAT FOR BATf, RETODEL
OUR SYSTEM SHOWS THE STATUS ON THIS PERMIT TO BE OUTSTANDING.
IT WAS APPLTED FO& BUT UAS NOT BEEN PAID T'OR NOR SIGNED F'OR THE CODE ON
EXPIRf,D PERMITS REQUIRES US TO COLLICT TIII PLAN CHECK FEE ltr' APPLICABLE.
TIIIS WILL AFFECT THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS THAT YOU APPLY FOR IN TIIE
F'UTURE. IF YOU HAVE DONE THE WORKWITIIOUT THIS PERMIT WE ARE RDQUIRED
TO CHARGE A DOUBLf, F'EE. WE ARE AISO PLACING A LOCK ON YOUR CONTRACTOR
LICINSE lryflIcE WII-L PRIVEN-I'YOU F'ROM GETTING ANO'|HER PERMIT UNTTI- THIS
IS RESOLVED.
Please call {79-2139 or come into our office at your earliest convenience to let us knorv how you
would like to proceed- Thank you.
{Po"'"*o'uo
TOI,'IN OF VAIL
75 S. FROMTAGE ROAD vAIr,, co 81657
970-479-2138
DEPARTMEI.IT OF COMMI]NITY
NOTE: THIS PERMTT MUST BE POSTED
PLUMBING PERMIT
Job Address: 756 FOREST RD
I-rocat,l0n. - .: 756 FOREST RD Parcel No.. : 2LO]--O72-LL-OL2 Project No. : PR,J99-02aI
o
DEVELOPMEIiE
iIOBSITE
Permit
ON AT
Total PcrDits Fee- -- --- - - >
Fa!4!!nt6 - -- - - - - -
ALL TIMES
P99 -0 075
SIATUS...: ISSUED Applied..: 07/2L/1999
Issued. - . : 07 /28/1,999 Expires- -: 0!/24/2000
#:
APPLTCAI T VAII, VAI.LEY PLI'MBING & HEATING PhONE: g7T-g4g-7777
P O BOX 2048, AVON CO 81620
CONTRACTOR VAIL VALLEY PLT]MBING & HEATING PhONC: 970-949-777I P O BOX 2048, AVON CO 8L620 OT{NER GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
AT[N: A EMMET STEPHENSON,fR, 100 GARFIELD ST 4TH FL, DENVER CO 8
Description: PLUIVIBING FOR BATII ENLARGEMENT Valuat,ion:4, 000 . 00
FEE ST'MI!'ARI
Plunbing-_-_-> 60,00 ResguaranE PLar Rcwi.ew--> .00 Tota1 calculaEcd Fee6---> 78.00 pl,e! Check---> 15.00 TOT}'L FEES-----
fnvcst igat i on >
wl1I call,---->
.00
3 .00
79. 00
74. 00
Dept: BUILDING Division:
JRM-Dept: FIRE Division:
!r i| * * * i * * * * * * *t * ** *
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1 . FIEIJD INSPECTTONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPIIAIiICE.
t*a*ertrli*iltttt***a*tie*l.itrtt **1rr* l,****r********t*{**** ****{**ttt*rrf tir*ir** *t*rirrrrr*rrrrrirrrr
DECTARATIONS
I herBby acknoitledga that r have read this applicagion, filLed out in full the informagl,on requj,red, coltrplcged an aceulaic plot
pl.n, and state chaC all tshe infoanarion provided a6 requi!.d i6 correcr. I agle€ to doriply wich the infornacion and plots pIan,
Eo conply wibh all TowD ordinancee and BtaEe 1aw6, and to buitd this gtructure accordlng to Ehe Tovn,6 zoning and subdivi6ion
codeB, design revie!. apploved, Unifon Building code and oEh€! ordinatrces of hhe Town applicablc Cheraco.
REQUESTS FOR TNSPECTIONS SHAI,I, BE MADE TWEIITY-FOUR HOURS ]N AD'\IANCE BY
ITEM: -O51OO BUTTDING DEPARTMENT O7/2L/T999 .JRM AcTion: APPR APPROVED rECM: O55OO FTRE DEPARTI'IENT O7/2L/1,999 JRM Action: APPR N/A
rrr**rr*r*tr.*i*rr**.rr*.*.rr*---rr.--.t;-*r*rt***r*rrrrrrrt
T()$ T OF VAII,, COIJORII)O SCaleutlt
*a rr*a tt ir * * rr*r ri r
ftlat.GrE Nunb€! !
Prlm.nE l|.thod !
RtC-0544 Atloune:
cA tlotAtLonr
7e. oo o7 /2e/99 11|.06
185rtlw PLt l,lB Init. iIN
ParEiE llo ! P99-0075 ?lTrc: E-PLIB PIITUBING PBRI'llt
P.!d.l Nor 2101- o72 - 11-0r.2
SiE. Addrcs.: 756 IOREST nD
IrocaEion: 756 PORESr RD
ttiB Ptlm.nt
TotaL Fssr:
79. oo Toial .A.IJL P[Er:
Ealanca 3
?8,00
7A.OO
.00
.l,ccounE CodG Dolcriptl,on
PP OO1OOOO31112OO PLUUBINO PERMIT FEES
PF 00100003112300 Pr,Nf CHECK FEES
tfc 00100003112800 wxIJ! crl/rJ rNsPEcTroN FEE
ADourt
60. 00
15.00
[heck: 185$,
Dater 7l?9199 0t ReceiPt: ml?e0l clE0( t79'm
Arount Tendered t79.00 Ctrange tl.0e
Tonn of r** cLt!;T$fR
ttAIEt 7l'cllt$ 0l
UAIL |lNilJY PIH I}E
I.|ILL CALL IIGPEC
$RIL US.LEY FIH II{
HFS075
TLilDEft I}€TRIL ct{ 1s699
DflTE:
tlai I
.RECIIFT fiT
fE[r.lrrfr ffiltz0l
OTY
I
t
I
ffillt$,lT ltr
$e.m rpp
1S.g$ rpF
t3.0S rltC
'| il
CX
CK
tn
r79.m
TIilt;!13
Ytll foR YtlJti PAYEI{T!
t78.00
79. eS
B7l19/1999 L2t42 3432719s14
f-5-r-
U
M{or Envllonmontll S'rYl6of, Inc'
10O Orrflrld 8t. f200
.\.\
\
Drnver GO 80206
303-322-9490
@e@
FrxTnArvsltssrowt t
DATE: JulY 19. t39O
TO: Toni Stcvrmon
FiOM; Urr trF?
TIUMBER OT ?AOES Iil TIIAilSMI9EIOT: ?3
GAIL gO3-273 000+ FoB nE-TRAIrSMlSSlOl{
Pllrrr cdl lfll rt 303€l?{3e0 wtlh rny qurrtlonr
Thmhyou.
tbr it{ot
,,,\,?ll:il
/Townof Vail --'
0FFICECOPY
A7/19/1999 12.42 3tJ327r33LC
MA.'OR
ENVIRONMEI$TAL SERVTCES. INC.
July 19, 1999
Toni Steygrron
Grnerrl Communlcrtionl, fnc'
lO0 Grrfidd St'
D.nvtr CO E02Oa
RE: Ranovedon of 758 Fonrt Fd, Vdl' Cslorrdo
Mafor Envlronmcntd sdvicet. Inc. provided ttrc overrlte for dl rbclomfm rnl dlrporod of
. rhr arbcstot containing;;i;;hf,; tcilar rhc cJnrtruaton drbr6' Advrncrd Dcmolition
Tcchnolool', ln". pro"iOJi-"t"ti lrc"nl"a ttb.ltos luprvLlon rnd two v'orl.gn' ilrte
licanf. numbcr E300. Thc top floor of tho rcsld'nc' cojrritlrd of e kitchcn ' llvlngdining
room, bodroom rnO r pa*ifrv ienovsted ba$room. lt wel HEPA, hlCh cfffcior'cy porticulila
alr, vocuumad fid dl hofirc;Ul rurfsc* *"ta *"t wlpod. Thc bad'oom'br* wer bolrtcd
ln rccordrnce wltn r,"[. ina f.a"."f rogulrtiont. Th. 'popcorn' criling metorlel wrt
,rmovcd. brggrd rnd finsportod in accorttenco wlth NESHhFS, Environmer Ul Fotrction
Agrnca. OSHA, oooupni-oiii
-Sif.tv
"nO
Health Admini.fridon, rlr monhorlng compldtd
trrt phsrt of dr. Ptolcst'
The hrll rnd rtairwcy to tht glragc wore prcclca d urlng thc HEPA vec lum ond wd
wlpod.
Ths gtnge contdnid vrtiout piecer of contttucdon debdr. Drvwrll t'ret hrt lnv rcmntnt
of coiling sprsy on it *.. O.Ci0i-rs'contrmlnr6J construction drb4e end l'endltd in the
t.mamannoraathecoi|ingmste'|d,Therertofthoconctrucdondcbrirwsitrkontoih6
local bndlill. *_.'_
Tho tlr monitofinc rnd bulk remplo .nttytlr lndlcrtcd th.t il sn eabertor fib'r rcl'l3e
occutrod, h could not U"-J*lJtiO'urlng riafo of th6 rn tranomlslion r6dtrol mlcfoscopy'
(TEMI
Ag a furfier pricsutlon. tlre owrur roquoctrd_thrt th3 il||, lncludlng fi€ c(iltrrctor toolG
ino equrp.ori on rhc, L xgie vrcuumed and rll horizontll surtrc.! bc clcenld
ThoprojactttrrtrdonJulyls,rgggrt3pmcndwmcompl'tod'finrlclornnce'rt
lo:4Orm, July 10. tgbs.- lccommodarionr vrrru not nac''..ry * thc w,rko'' wofkd
rtl|lioht thtough,
Brsed upon thr work comphttd and the'tatuhl ot.ir mofiltorlno conductl:d' no f$thof
lstion it rcqulrrd.
l@Garj|'irilstcraloSu|te2Qo.w|u'er,@|g&8en6.[3iof||341-9|90.F'|,ct303]3N}9|o7
87/19/1999 L2.42 3432713914
o
ATTACHMENTS:
July 9, 1998
Jury 12. 1989
July 13,1999
July 13, 1999
JulV l.t, 19Sg
July 14, 1999
Julv 15, 1999
July'16,1999
July 16, 1999
July 16, 1999
lnsogctio,il Rrport with Recommendrdons
iniiioi"n Report with Recommtndetlons
it"'n-.ti.slo" ilmtton Microlcopy Rcport
Abrtcment Ploposrl
St|to Notificetlon
lnwrico
OSHA Monitoring
Fincl Chrrance Monitoring
Chrin of CudotlY
Anrlficd Rrrulu
^ffififfiAltt\u
William A' Mejor
Prcsident
67/I91L999 12.42 383271se14
nvorcE
-|i--nFrttF-
St DIUITTED IIO: Gtnsrl Comuicsionr, hc.
100 Grlicld St' Suito 400
Dcarrcr, CO t0206
JOB LOCATION: 756 Fofltst Rd.
DATii:7/1411999
IltWOICf ITIIJMBEB: 7 56F@'0 l'99
Vd[ Coloildo
Initiat h4oction ed S@Pling - 7El99
Rcurn rip on Sstt$day ?/10199 for additional S-npling
TEM xrdyrir oftto Ar $nplct @ Sgo.m cflch
Abdcmot md clom rry as por pmPosal dord7ll3llrg
$4310.00
$E00.00
$t'm
t5,775.00
TOTAL AtllOIlNTt $'[6.fit
LESS DtrFOSIT (CaErCK ffXltu8): $+mo.00
T0TAL AMOUIIIT DIIE IjF0NCOMPLEIIONT $A!S!J@
Ptcasc mskc chcck payablo b: hlajor Environmaul Sen'icee' Inc.
lfll (hrfiold St. Suite 200
Etenvd, Colorado t0205
vllLglL}J:Jy LZi cz
---
JASZ I La)L.l
Adircr:
756 Fonest Rd.
Vail, Cotorado ,--_.
Contlst:
Turi St4haron
Cracrd C@ulicltioffb IDr-
100 Garfiold St. Suita 400
DrF: JulY 9' lS99
Rcnovstim of Mlgter Bodroon and Bath
Stnrcouc; Framc
Sq. Ft.:2000
{gc: 1960
Mechrdcal T\'Pe: GFA
TNqPECTION.REPoRT
UA'OR
EWIRONMENIAL SERVICES' INC.
co.80206
EoMqGENEOUSAREA FIrx)R
l. Ccilirrg Texturc UPPcr
SAMPLEI'{UMBEB. BES]"III$3L)
?56 Forrest{T 3-5 9 r Chrysotile
(A,B,C,D&E)
il,4W
Nclson f. tttrt'ott
2, DryWslUTapc&Mud Uppct ?56Fonsst-DW FromTrape-l%
(A,B,C,D & E) Cirysotile
#
NOTES: Samplcs wer€ collected from identical homogeneous area$ thrcug! tut the
rmrk arca and Oe ceuns i;'fte gsr;e. Thc laboratory inalysis in{icaled tba: thc cciling
t6xturg sontrined from S-5% Cfftd'tite asbestos. lt ii o'r professional opini rn that tlrc
;-li"g il#;i
",fticlt
.ont i* uiU"*to. also oontaminattd thc drv wall whic I was
reno6d duc to constructiJ[toOtfing activitics' Major Environmcntal Se vices' Inc'
recoromsndr tf,"t nr.rfto tlipiilG d;* to dctcmini the cxtsnt of the con rnination
beforr making our ctcan "p-ffitirntnailions'
This would be accomplished ry
ililf,r* li, *"pft"gll,i i"pe sampting p-rocedures tbroughout thc prsrn'ses' Wc
would be eblc to "ona*tiiiii ;ftG;r Saiuruuy, JuIy 10,1999 to cxpedit< this
situation, with your verbal app, oval.
Rcspcctfully,
Building lffipcctor
Lic.# 523-t0-1t03
tN h1ba saw't. E tftc 2o() c D{:r7ryrrt, @lomdo ffizots o (1of[ 322-9490 ' Ffrl' (ilut) 82*9107
r$
\ 4<.
Es
!tt
€e
s,q
E
st
E
+-
J
RE,
e
&
v \f
I2!g - 38327-t ss14
.s +t &G;I i I
gl t=t Bn
EI g,F
;
-et i 5 {t
sl E 1 gE
,flTi *5 -_i - {J
999
z
g7 tr9lL -.-T_.-
-.-.>
al Nl
E\al
$
dt )l
vt
g
-s
'lr
B
s
$
u
{
R ,t
6
E
d
3
k
E
\e
o ,31
-.1 {
g$
di t
rl
fl
Fl
a t.
F"-s?
5l
,.lgwtrt
E A
g t
E
g
r
I
9 .a
{,
E
t6 | / 19/ LH33 Lza C2 303:2I Laarq
?.oa
-
ol
-
lf,r.larytl trtt.lFnl
n sseav ot n$r no N M s J$Fi'::".#
ift l; j lll s':;: :H.'*H*:k'-Tll uffi #
!
RE,s 61fl
ifi ilr rruo ltltonY I lrtl,ltt!
AA ..sl'tcl l nugrl la ll'rtf !lOit
iror, i rroor
lnnAr bwl ll
t td. i.r*'blr
Rffi, ftrnFa---
t.hl, ltttPt'u'
f,rlffi tt'rtrlor., rrktr
rrffint' rent'+rttt
rtM ir-
InD O9{lr. Olttal . '
^a tbht' ft|n'F ------'--
r.l . r.+ ttrt.L wF ' lctP' I
rfM ttl'|lnt, WrrtrlYrtrr
rA Odn n!. W"l' w'lt"
-
.3zo @ 6)
v ls ft88d6'
?Grl !l
attl
xirp
AA
F{tl
olllA
laol' l
rer []
lil?',,-niir',fl i"'X""Jl'nr.*!ffi =t"1"-]]'-t=A .ll9
cllrnrt€qrdrLurtltllt
It
EUr
L
7-
J.
4.
t.
o.
t.
!.
t.
lo.
.
lt.
rl.
1..
tt.
4--F.'
-=-.---8.
--4-
G-.
-...'-..-....4_
J-..
_.--f--
---''
llotEi ll lftr Dltr.!. I'd $rtl{
..rlrtr h.tn ia .||qllll rt'lG
rtreitt.nO lt.- u'r trrta'rrv^t'
ltunl.;.t tr|t Pl.t t'li'rtlt
rrirt'i rr..rord rr rh'r
nollnttullhotl Oi!'i'
I "'l
'-"1
r*.l I
tuHa-
a|. .lii
trn.lPl
i,ril'ro'h. Fr?fl.?,'fi"1i:'S'if i.0-rr,r{t':ll, -..nt.r-**trnnt tlrFiTr tnr rrlrrra' wr *ttl
nctllt t u I drhy' r' "$'G-' -.-,,i-1,','., t.v .*tt l!' ttu rnir'l' trr'r.ltY:::ll.:""t *
.;;;;;;tt' rtitt'r{$ br-r hrtd
rdtr}'tr
@ 00t allLalraaa
' szrives tat
L Z, .+1 ;tlJ.f4,rJJr{
ll:ot FAI tot lct ct9f nEs. 8llv. !nv.
r- Gl o et NE dle
OO Cto€
oo ooel
oo ego
co 000
€, ct
(,0
oo
C'o
T
fl
t
i,lEt:
o
;g
g
s{*Er(=Ed
Hc b
aE3 FF tr ffiE d,HE C'#.tr *pt a'Hi8
E! E
$sE E rrt ge tt ul Ei z {
5
e
5 g
_i
5 6
F
il
ti
,il
c
I
i$lll
'J
E
.A
I
F
E
oo cr9 E oo
o€, cter 946
sF se $.d€
?9 99 eFg ll
o8 -8 pRB
g
€t
€
dt
tl
e
5 ii;at
f;(3
A
s
F a F
l1 ?
,u
B
E
E
tal
ti I
fi
r:
0
E
8P 6r(\.$$
:t=il,r w
sg 9A TE t$td EE
.e
E €F
it tg BE gs
E.-g
_8.9 €€9g
6(J
1g rE
fEE EE E
fEI EI E
fEg E€ E
{6() .(o ((
I
3r
ts-{
q
6
I
t
t:
d
E
t l, s t s s S**s
ctF-I'E
F<J(J
SEro--E8---,,
fE.'-'*!$o-"*
2 tru..J
ocr('ctGloooocl
oo()Q ctooocto
0c'oooocooG
cr c} C e O ctcr Eg c
oocro ooct0('e
<> o o o o oo c' €t G
E F F o c GtttB-E
tr!.
I
Es p;
I
EOclclF P- Z-
8f $E
t
$$l IE
i Ef;*
[:
88t F!-
t etPE'\
iE i ;Ef
€,€!l
3E;3;
<t! <tD {
E
i l o
!
E
f.e
E
F
E
E I E
3
g
t s
E
r= Es 'i. Ei
{
5
i
T t a
I
E
.t
5
st
ig
€r !E
FRHRHPR
FIF]F $$$ss$$TEETEEE rttsIgs gEEEE**IIIEI}I FFPEEEF
I a E t
s-i --t ata 3
a7 /L9/L999 383271.991 4
Addrtu:
756 Forest Rd.
Vnil, Colorado
Contrcl:
Toni Stepheorou
Gocral Comrmicdiols' hc.
100 Garficld st, suitc 400
Drtc July 12,1999
Reilwadotr of Magtcr Bcdroorl end Batlt
Stnlduru FrfrG
Sq. Ft.:2fi)0
Agq 19@
MechenicalTYPo: GFA
INSPECTIO|IJR4PORT
fA'OR
ETiNIRONMENTAL SERVTCES' INC.
sawliE.r,o€auqN
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
&
9.
IAPE SAUIIE
SAMPLENT]MBER
756 Forrcst-Ts471099'A ..(|*-8 KitcherrWirdowSill
DiningRoomTablc ToP
Family Room EndTablc
Top of Ofricc Dcsk
Bedroon Window trdgc
Farnily Room End Table
BarLedgo
Batlnoom Sink To'P
Ips
Up'per
Upper
Upper
[lwer
l,owcr
Inwcr
lnwer
I,ower
Lower
RESTLIE.G4)
ND
ND
ND
t'lD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
aa
aa
€
.D
-E
-F
€
-H
-t 1$ aa Bu*BcdRsili
SAI}IPLE IIrcATION
AIRS MPLpS
E,SAB SAMPLE NIJMBER
l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6,
tv{rstcr Bcdroom
Bathroom
Botbur of Ivfain Sbircose
Garsge
Outside Porch
FicldBhnk
756 Forrest4ll099-01 .( .. Iz .. .3 {3 4 t' -04
.+ t' -05 t .. {6/8
RESIILTS (+/-)
0.( 14 flcc
a.(12floo
0.1)08 f/cc
0- )06 floo
BDL
}]D/BDL
Upper
Upper
lpwer
Ilwcr
Ilwer
'-.
llD - Nono Dctrctcd
BllL - Bclow Dctcction Linlt
F/CC - Flborr pcr Cublc Ccntincter
PAGE I
tu, eiar'rild,$@.. g'|ttp 2(N o &nnr. tuIt& gr,206 ' pog) 32!2a49O c F 't (lfft) S2*SIO7
A7/t9/I999 I2t42 34327r99t4
)
NOTES: lvlajor Enviroomentat services, Inc. conduc'ted follow'up sampling m the
ffifiF, Uuri[on o* initiat inspoction and samplng fi9m 7/!/99, tg.detarmr re the
extent ofthe ssbcstos oontr*l*tion on the premises. We conductcd both Air Monitoring
;;G -d i;t sanptes in strntcgic locations.throughort ths housc. AII nir e of the
tape'samples talcn weie an8lyr€d aiO founa to_Uc 'None Dctcctcd", Ths air t *mplcs
t"il irdi*td readings of conccrn only in the ttrtastcr Bodroom and Bartuoorl arcas'
The f/cc conccnt"ations were slightly above the MAAL (l\fanimrmr-Allovable Asbestos
irurilofO.Ot f/cc, but wcll balJw ihe PEL (Permissiblc Exposure Limit) of 0 ' l0 flcc'
Thcsc laboratory re*oftr pi* tf,t irb"ttt"t iit,rft" t""ti"eatom ow futy 8n t'ampling
f"Jfr4":oi f"r,i-t -cmlf Setvices, Inc. to make the following recommendations:
t. Run TElvf (Transmission ElctEon Microscopy) analysis on lhe t$0 air sar.rples (#01
)which came back abovc thc MAAL iimit, to detsrmine gxacllY wh rt is in
thosc samplcs . Tltis is requiredpnor to any additional wort bcing done a rd will bc
donc at an additional cost of$180.00.
2. Clcan up and remOval of contaminatcd dsbris rn the garagc. Thcrc are sel eral
salvageablc itcrns which may bc cleaned and relsed'
3. Contain and remove asbestos containing ceiling tcxture from thc mestcr br*oom.
4. Clcan up of salvagoable itpms in bedroom.
The remaindcr of the house is free of contamination, and no furtfrer action shr uld be
r.4"tr"d. Major Environmenfnl Servicss, Inc- shall submit a rcperate proposa . for thc
above actions futhwith.
MESI PAGL lJ.
BuildingYnspector
Lic. #523-80-1t03
f 5",\
6
"l'
r{
+)e q
I'r
ts
il
fi
-tl
.*Q\E
q,
MESI 87/L9/L999 LZi42 3632719914
=2 Hrit Hi
$$fi 4!i | | | a-0 e'o-6
al rvl
Hl tll
sl f-l
$l
ddl ull
q
e *o
*tt
14 ]o
u
s
K D rl
,5
e,
$tsr li*
e
e 0 N
b (u {}
\s
{
H$
dj*$?E?
?{Hf &EJgrrl X'-r-\{G ; a{ ^R
s(
U Z J .. e e S{ E S r E i ris $ l
,l 5ts{T +6+ie f
,l
$
d
#l
F"-.-bt
$
it
g-u L-a / La)a_.. tz..+z J(,JZ
'
l' ffIll
Ol/'LZ/se Ig!{ oe:{E FII tos CCC elet
lllc-J I
EBt. &{v. !l8RV'@oor
t J=-t
;.,.!+_--.
l
nESERVOI#.IVIRO NMENTAL 6
r 6rr oir lrr f nctr
qflavElt co 00101
n-r.ItOt| a*.llut frllrll lrttlro t'lttr t'!*Ct"-lt',;
t Glirlor'llta. lgo.ttll nrl ld't4co }t8ldrlloulll Ull ot+Y ;;
:
ri
:l
'*
fr
liliiu.i tloo* otrra
rrrt altallr t'wrl I t'll, {
IIIJ rip rr.l ttror|l
eA '|'U
ttt . . --'!rr.t trtd, Dr.trrlll
ffi,-'.F,G t*
ltt?Tr.Gtt tdnlllulr
fl! il*'' ot',..,
AA flri* . lrrtnr
-
trl,L l.[ E q rl] tclt' F
trx grbrha, wlr|| lv'l|r
AA t latr i||l. Utl-.
Iti..lll
13
LadrtrOittnUfr Wr&iJt a r.lf.|'
_ tt,rdrrt hullt
-1.
ll r -- !l9l,t
masrt airtl
-r
ori
-
lolrt
tlduIIlrX-UUilG
tc.
tt.
ll,
,t-
1r.
rrirg lor oir urir.r.t .l tld..| atL'
rt,n*r !i trfifl.tt lt tH qlrrtt t
Fr|lr ltc br|.a
I Tt _ t, rr--i-D;*-i, ---:t.,....---!.{..-.--.- $--- --t ta .t tt-E--
Lt--: -'-Et--
tl
t.
7.
4,
0.
L
,.
A
RES
a|rth! llcu fi! l.l laltr ! tln{ Fritt]
I lhr ltuul la t.r, l't vt.rftl 'tr
r}l wtraat t{rrt..{ rall- L hlt rdf|r. rt ttr
FtttrFrlarl. ltFitt
t-t rrV rdr lr lUl .rq.lt rltl l.Ll lttrll $rror i7
lr.tl|la ltt v.ttdr. arrilli rNl || tulP'l ilbr
@oo2
p
I
I
;
I
I
B
T I
I t il I .t .t !
v
i tr t
E
T
ll
r
' or)tr;ao troN oe:ot 8Ar ro! EEt c19t ntsg' B{V' SEnV.
BFEBEgioB I
oc)9crctc'C'0ct
acroo00000
oooo0c000
ocrocrco0cro
? I I e e 219 E
d-crt\,crO€9cto F
0cr6crGc|E'OO F
HSrB$88838
i
r{
;E[
i!
TT
Ei
it :s Hi 8.H 3E
E* 3 II
#F t *e t t-IE €8 t-ffig I Bd ts i Er - ifr |l
EE 8 l- '"
HE s 'llsl € q A F,HE:I EblS O ora-o g= F Egtf!E:ru yf tS -v,lu ?? -l
-
v dE
Ii,sir
888888888
gFEHEEHEE
$*-$$-'$EEF
RFR l! l'' ro FFK rtiti EAt
s8g EEE e gP ttt ,!I!
FPF
N
rO
5 t
d +I
F c
0l h
!
T
s F
F ta
.{rt t
ry
E a
?
H I
T
fi t\
cn (cl ro
6J r*
t rlt
$I
E
B !
,!
E
t\€66 Dla
r\l N +t
EE ,+3E
F5 FB TT TE €o ln It FI\
E 5 tt I
F
oF-urg
F<-tu
]o.r-t
r<-E
o'>ZFE
ItJ<Lla
qrUrJ{
I
!
E
p
6
trl'
I
I
E$*
E l
T
.t >t -
I
f;
E
e
JQSZI LAALq
T
.E
I
E oo
iltE
ih'
E;'.*
?3
Iir
It t
il4r
*E
;F
.FE
EE
I
g
I l
T
fl I lr
E
I
I t
I
E
ol/ Lal Laaa Lza.tz
c
u,l rp E l z F ()
trJ D
Rq E F?_E =d E =E l' Jnl
= C)>
E r
L a
g-
J I
E
h
II
J r/)
l-
$lr
=-6lrJ TEJ C(J
8?l]-gl1999 lzi42
otl,'rtee roN oe:{E
363271991.4
P r tos mr elet
MFI\I
nEg. E{V. s8nv.
TFtlJE 'I 6oor
,t,,1 RBS 51643
:
RilIg
rc', l=l
r-=
;t-*-
v.rrra .Uf-- -oztoQl-:-o t -.. Ta- H}\=':[p
r. --------zz-=-;;; -il'\-df-- @' -*' g
'*. -*-lT= , =^=zie;= mZ- E":u' T:5
rt.
ffilS"is.;
H**. H---"- |hr t-a rdt
I
ltta lrl rF.l. l{ r.tl tr'i E-'r I
$iriftl=;:l
ff'ffi'S!,:lf---*"'l
t(ta
--
|
-----
",=
lF&t .f rrrtltt li|Hr-
nfrroquhrro4 uill'
t,t,|t
lfr,*'r
0ur.!Fl Dit.!Fa
h, FI rart-r|.
-|lt
l'Fr
-r't
s'tl'lnrt
,.S- *if l$,$if:":ll$'-'!.''.w'rt ' - f.f -aat l-.f ,r-ttd fi$|r ir F r*t|r F t'{l
d'f'Y rnvt tu4, ar a,Pt-'
rirre tlrr rrY qrdv lJ lSIt .|||l'th 'h' l'l'r"lrlt l|.Dl q?
-4; - -'*.......ttr -r"-11f Ts
":iirffl'C:
f^,
rA{:L I tJ
@00e
MLSI
ms. Bfv- $nY.
i i i E t I
T
I
6
q
c
2
T
s I
E
'I
d
T !I I t
I
I I
I I
T I t t
I I
I I
I
I
E s
!
I
t
E €o
I t t :l I I
T
E r I il
I
!I
E r
rJi E
B d
I
J t
t
t F
c
I
{t
||
g
F
I
{
FlsEsSc --ldddd
I
SFgEEE
I
I
EFtHHe
I
I lecqqq 18ti3'
I
lessas
IFFFF?
I
I 3lg3F3g
IFFFFF
I
I
IEESBE l[rrEl
lEtililn
l
I
I
IEEIII IEBBBB
|I!III
lEailpt
c .e
f;E
E
'EE
"=sl
g
FT
r5
EgE
sf;
3T
5 2 a
q
?
t
dt
r
T I 5
E
T
=f ,85 Er e
A?/19/L999 L2.42
otitznt rot{ oc:1l
39327L99L4
PAMit llt elsc
-,l'
r1
illil*
illll'
ci
i&
Eis 9E
EE u!J.s8 t-*
-r urt
EE
rE E3
E:
eE OI
lrs 6
,tl .( =HJr
E
=I
IE
U E
tD
F t o
=j I f
l-Auc t )
Eoo{
o
It rl of
f,r
lll (,r
s!
EI t-:tct !t cl ;!}it -i2
!t
at
ll
fr
i
F D n
l
e I
g
T'E E3 rT f5 rI gr
.E FT
l!l F4
lll +<
ME SI
mt. Ew. g8BY.
++++
+++++
lrr$^
+1-+++
++++f+.
++++
+++++
++++++
qBfiF*V
RIHP,rl
B$$Sf,f,
[$EE5$tilrililt
lSllll
iiliEi
FPEFTF
6
F 0
=8 I3
E o
v,-
to
l'f o
fr
E
E o
=ut rll E
F v,
e
A
b
R I
5
n
E
!P +e tt
=
'c*a-
A
I
E z
e
t T
E f z.
€
a7lt9lL999 L2i42 3632719914
otintee roN or:ae PAr 30! col cret
rfull,
l,$itl
(J a
$s
AE
H3
d-
sg 9t Hq gE
gE
F<
ffiE (nE
EIE
ffi$ r sH g
li
F
IL cl
6 tr
t
b (E
f;
-t
F
PAUL 2A
81002
A7lL9lI999 12.42
ori|l/li IED ur tl
38327L99L4
?AT tO3 et0t
MESI
nEs. ElV. Smv,t6c o
E r
ta s
T t
a
f;
t
I,*E
E rg
EB Ec rll
'E.g te :0
-EE -:
*g
e
E
Itl 6l
il
t
E 6
E
IL
I
E
B 1
tl
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
t,
IT
l-8
II
li
lu
I
l$
l5 l!
lr
t
I o
F D
.{i
il
s
3 t
s
I
E F
33
r
E
€E
IJ q
5
Ll I
ar,
I
I
!i
gl
lf;s
Fr
lEs
l!lHI
I'EE
I 'o
F$l'
13 I
le
lst
['
|J q
5
EI oc
C'E
v,lll o
E a
J
F
-lfr
.
=C'
E
E
g
o
E v,ul E
o
t!h n tr l\|t
I gl
e
LO
l8
tg
II
ls IF
E
E I
$r
t
'h 3,i t Irl
ir l,I
I
r{,I
I
t
I
gP
Iil Ti il it
EE
H
E tr _L
E
-:ll'l
E
a7/L9/L999 L2.42 3432(L:j3L4
=(}
^SBESTOS
ABATEMENT NOMFICATION UTd PERI\dIT APPLICATI )N FORM
FEE IIIUST ACCOMPA}TY THU| FOR}{. INCOMPLETE APPUCATION$ WILL AE RETI,RNED.
(Ptuit wlll b urttad o abrtst sBtr*tot solelr rp.clfirC ortwl*)
-h 16 t 86-6 +i
A*'-,{ru
.- Fn.W&
,r
ri
Drp tf Op0|ior (ctch):
M r. w@E*:*
tf{t Frdltttr.t @ X
tnrtllrryllflrt Y N
ffifrfrffiixii,fs3fr:.-rdrcdlr0.6|trl.ofdreor' re,qc.drc. hcr6t vr{.tor^clMrotcrbrrad
l .lor g. cDttt6 Ut Onl;t
trtifi
Clrl f:
l93rl Jn-
h.{. }fjr, nq'|fi Y l{. \Y
h":o elclcD:
&.:rd;
8dt:rr:
tc (lr&'br
l|lllDatc:
t|.rt Trnr:
lrlefAitrc
tbrr tr:
tn.rtn: o?4A
Tlu ,rr^ ail/ /( /4'-e/et1'/ zu''77( 1qA Jt' a,n'l *J *Px
t | -' :' t rt| t^:-^ .,)^tl^*,dl| A/acc I
t'tE et'-n , ""!l'j'*d^n. *,ll k i-.^ --oldrt^4r- urt/\ e/,acs /fi1at1t: e f ce! r'r -^-- rr ../, 'd;',L-.R^rr
^c-.A.4o,.; '^t7' -rl F&'he d{% e F cet(t^q sc'?\Fe ttottl - rE \" *-L,.atl. -rl d#.u",tl"i'Cig,=^t tl, 6e & &rt ,...A'-l
bt- q o,^-\ \...\ |"1*\o.L-..t
t'AuE zz MtrqT
!n
e m o
rJ
A u
.9 5 I Ja c
C
o
F o
u'
e
a
il z J
.-t
.l
,
o
F E
a c
m 5 g,
d 5
f,3
d_
o o
rl
3 o a
0
3 G
f;P
Hg
Fa
rE P5 :z UC )<
ffi T
F :r t."I
I
I I
tr
I *I I
F
a I I
n y\n t n \x ll r
I
1l
n q
s o
ts
F
t
\
N \D $t\n
r'
5
S l'
rl
7,
$
J f
s
-l
s--$
s +lrr $|}a
I
s i rtt
s +lp
s
d $E
D F ul
o F tt
I
rI
$r a
0 F
a4
s
{o
q rt
E
B 6 F B d s I
o
s.
b
tA f s n o
l.l $B
l'"
s t'
I s r s s F s F q \
b
\l
b
L s
s
0
F ('
ts
o
I
o
o
o
N
?
l,I
I 5
s F
C'
G>
F
I
o
9
0
v F o
E o
P D c e I B c
B c 6 o
tr
$o
!2i42 3432719914
1O ()o -.m e
3n t
E
I
flE
HE
{*
aE
T
I
I
I i
E t
B
I
F
E
B
F
il
!o
T
F?I
EEI
E*
s,,li
IIEi
s lHi atr
B
a7 /L9/1999
D -D
K
ts trl *:
a,o 7 D -{c 7 m
s7lL9l1999 L2:42
P.gr _ ol _
MLsI
tr|o|r! t3o3l t:lottoc FrE lror| ttilDli6 $r^tSrl{oo"5t}717t
p cEi, so$oe6{. roa-.tz6..rd Eor.!,to6 AFITR HOUnS US€ OF|Y
39327L33t4 TH\]E. ':'
6l?63
RESfRVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAT SEBVICES, INC.
o ;2i#ruil;;'J O REstJobi'' REs
EI H
FI tl
E rl H tf
E
[:
Dua P ]to:
Our Ti nc!
PCM tutOOA,
''t00{tEM AhfFA, L.v.l
SEM
xno Tord. nrtFl.!AAnCP_t
oilst lorC, ftardrst
xno Our.r& Oth.t
AA'ICP I
Palnt. SoI. Orllr.
T€M Orhrlde. w.'k
AA O,lnllno, Wrrt. I
PLM lhon.tgod, L(.
TEM +4. Ou.r'L
sEM +/-
Specily
l^EOnA'IOfiY IIOURS: Woldnyr: 0 .m . I P1||
Wa.trnoa: I|'n-3lrn
Ncrig. REOUInEO lor w..t.od ?LM trr/'r.toe^d
-U {f nov nusH
-24
hour
-3-5
wftLdry:
P.i6 Nothr AEOUIhEo lor TEM 6 tlou. RUSX
M _ E llcrn RUSH _ 2{ lEit' 3-6 rotdryr
3,5 wcatdly turn .ound .|liccr i9 ltb wls'ng, wr wlll
ootlty Fu it drlavt xc arrrcrtd-
,.tr mry rpglv lor TEM rnrlyri: rhrr lrborrtory norurr ot
ur.ly.l. on w.thndr, StmDlot Wlll ba .nrty[d during
norL 3rnb|t .lL..hgv?! .rvlca b rurhorlttd-
P _ sFEoaL RUst{ _ 5 Ort _ t0 ory
No$cc n€OUlFtO lor SFECIAL RUSH AA. RCiA o' TCLP
nCnA .nd TCIP SP€CIAL BUSII i5 3 Dry Tsh.round
EU 'Volun\c
60ti .,
Po
I Zaa
rllo _
t24o
.l?uo
(1{o*
- 2t -._
I
3.
5-
0.
t.
r0.
ll.
t2,
t3.
r4.
r5.
lulr .r mrnr additionrl lha.tt ,r n rd.d.l
NoTC: ll tha e.ctrg. hat au.taihrd .|lbrt.ntl.l d.Fair o. rh. svrtody r!., i. hgl.n, rloo and Eont*t prola€t Drmrg.. .nd )hlOtar. REst witt rndBa hoomho ||nrplo. brtd uPg!,JALrerlion .rcttv.rt wlth tho.e r.n9Lr. nE$ b not ||aron ibl! tor rrrorr or imirric rr lq crlcdrdonr ,rrt ltlno tto.n !h.
u|hpllr guaruraad lf rhgrt
0tlr.urnrourd limgr r.! blrro uoon d|n.a 0t ncriA by L.bo[rory. Crtl labo'rt{ 'y ,o. nvmDof ot
,biitoq.riilca Drarrih.:th l4'7
rF|\lE aa
Eool
o
EgSii i gi"ii F
IE i' H td "!
il fl I
=
:$liirnB
IIE 1[E
BH rE sF
Fsl
iE g6
8El
h
IH if,1,i "E
i!a t I
t p
;
39327L39t4 MESI
r83. 8l{Y. SBRV,e19t
Fuus iob\
tot o
I
g eQ
3S I
I 2 E
I3
E f,F,
Er
i ar
I It
E l*fl
$"i{s :
:
T
trIf[[[
l$i$$$n
TETEEEgg
r8$$$$$$
t t
a
I
!
I
td It o t
I
*i
$i Il
Ei
ai
TI
$;
{'r
E
3
3
e c'
$
3
HT
-IJJJJ
"BBBBBet
l---r4J.a r888888t
..lJltld J :!o9!eF!tFP E Ct.'|.'arcttt6
$TEfr
gOoOCTOO
rFSSFHEt
ooctE el cl 0
iEhEEeFil
t^r $00
a7lt9l].993 L2142
OliLS/ge Fll 10:tt
i?
IT :,L !rI t+it
I
r
tl
P
h
a t
5
_r
!A
tl r'
3
B :p fr :E rt
-rEl
-a -$
x
!t t I t r s
t f
tl
P
a
s
tl s
3
B E a
.r
t
*
-\l
D, l
\-.\l- l -
a :s
I -1
\'
t^\i
Nr
,\s
\
n _&w
Sv {I -r"
d!or s\q\
rN
$'d c
X
\l
p sl...cris
8-s
tx f *a;o 44sr,&$,*rl/fur;rU fg-Yw' 'b' x- 7' -/o ?tx?l
WHIRLPOOLS . SAUNAS . STEAMBATHS
\,B5tr,ttrt
MICHELLE J. CARFI
PHONE (303) 761-Os06
Frx (sosl789-2724
trll
925 W KENYON AVE. #14
ENGLEWOOO, CO 80110
rrrtttt!ll
REPTl3I TO$N OF VArL, COLORADO PA6E 1
AREA: JRI!@L/t4/2O@@ L5t27 REOUESTS - TNSPECTH tORK SHEETS FORz L/L4/2@
Actlv{ty; 899-@19O L/14/2O Type: A-BUILD Statuer FII{AL Conetrr ASFR
Addreesr 756 FOREST RD
Psraelz 2L0L-072-LL-OL2
Deecript{.on : ENLARGING BATHROOI'!
ApplJ-cantr STEPHENSON, TONI
Ovner: GEHERAL COIIUUHICATIOIIS INC
Contractorr STEPHENSON, TONI
Occ:
Phone: 3@3-355-6@00
Phone l
Phone: 303-355-6000
Uee: V N
fnepectlon Requeet
Requeetor: Toni
Req Time: ELz@b
Iteme requeeted to
00@96 BLDG-F{nal
Infornstlon. . ..
Comments:
be Inepected..,
Phone:
Action Comments Tlne Exp
Inepeotlon llletory.....Itemr OAO3@ BlD6-Franlng
@7 /23/99 Inepectorl JRM Iten: A@@5@ BLDE-Ineulatlon ftern: @AQ6@ BlDG-$heetrock Neil
Iteml @@O7@ BLDG-Mlec.ftern: O@O9@ BLDG-FinaI
@L/t4/@@ Inepectort CD
Actlon: APPR APPROVED
Actlon r
'i.r)\.!
\
REPT131 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO
@L/L /ZO@Q @8t16 REQUESTS - INSPECTN WORK SHEETS FOR: L/L4/2@
Occ i
Activityz P99-oO75 L/L4/2O Typer B-PLMB Stgtuer ISSUED Conetr: ASFR
Addreegr 755 FOREST RD
Locet{on t 736 FOREST RD
Percel t ZL@L-O72- Lt-OLz Uee:
Deecrlptlon: PLUMBING FOR BATH ENLARGEI'IENT
Appltcant: VAIL VALLEY PLUI'IBING & HEATING Phone: 97O-949-777L
Ovnerr GENERAL COI'II'IUNICATI0NS INC Phone:
Contractor: VAIL VALLEY PLUI'IBING & HEATING Phone: 97O'949-777L
-U a
PAGE 4
AREAI EG
Inspectlon Requeet
Requestor ! Cireg
Req T{me: OBI0Q
Itene requeated to
Informat{on. . ,.
Comrnente: will
be Inspected...
call
Actlo
Phonez 949-777L
Commente Tlme Exp
@@290
Inepectlon Hletory.. ...Itenr @@2L@ PLMB-Underground Item: AO22@ PLMB-Rough/D. 1{. V.
@8/69/99 Inspector: CD
Iten: OA23@ PLI'IB-Rough/l{ater
@A/O9/99 Inspector: CD
Noteel tgol.ate uater linee
Iternr OO24@ PLMB-Gas Plping Item: @@25@ PLI'tB-Pool/Hot Tub
Tten: @A26@ PLHB-Ml-es.
Item: OO29@ PLI'lB-FlnaI
s
Action: APPR
Acti-on r APPR
from dvv
under water teet
gtreet preeBure
EDr LDr Mb ?ar-'nt #en-o/eo
3o [,*ry4
^ Z//a fkt.,t t U"Vt//qs tr4
TOVIN OF VAIL
7s s. rfrNtees noAD vArL, co 8L657
970-479-2L38
APPLICAI T
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
DEPARTME}fiT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME}frT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED
ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMTT
.Tob Address: 756 FOREST RD Location...: 756 FOREST RD
Parcel- No.. : 2LOL-072-LL-012 Project No.:
ON ,JOBSITE AT ALIJ T]MES
Permit #: 898-0325
SEATUS...: ISSUED
Applied. .z lO/22/1998 rssued...: Lo/29/t99e Expires..: 04/27/a999
Phone z 3038275793
Phone : 303827 57 93
PINYON BUILDERS
P O BOX 96, MTNTURN CO 8L545
PINYON BUII-.DERS
P O BOX 96, MrtflrIJRN CO 81645
GENERAI, COMMT]NICATIONS INC
ATTN: A EMMET STEPHENSON 'JR,1OO GARFIELD ST 4TH FI,, DENVER CO B
Description:
RENOVATE GARAGE
Occupancy: M1
Tlpe Construction: V N
ValuaEion:20,000
FileDlace Information: ReEtslicted: Y
Prj-vate Garage
T)4ge V Non-Rated
Add sg FL:
*of ca6 Appliance€:
Building-----> 245 'o0 Reetsuaranh Plan Review--> -00
DRB Fee--------
Recreation Fe€--------- ->
clean-Up Depo6it-- - -- -- ->
TOTAI, FEES-.---
ToEaI CalcuLatsed Feer---> .t s57.25
Additional Fces- ----- ---> ' .oo
totsal Pernil f€e--------> 557.25
Paymenls--------
BALANCE DUE..-- ,OO
*of wooa/Pallets.
8:00 AM 5:00 PM
Pfan Chcck--->
Inveshigation>
will calI---->
159 .2s
.00
3 .00
50.00
.00
100.o0
TOV/Comm. Dev.
Clean-up it Refund
approved
amount
date
+Of Ga6 Log€:
FEE SttMt4ARy 1**********i***
***r***r****t** * * t * * * * * f * * * * { r *
' rrem: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMEIffT DepE: BUILDING Division:
1,o/22/1.998 CHARLIE AcLion: NOTE PI,ANS TO CHARLIE
1o'/29'/a998 CHARL,,IE AgEtg4: APPR CHARLTE DAVIS iibm'' osaoo-Fr,atrnvrNe DEPARTMEIilT Dept: PLANNTNG Division:16/22/tggg CHARLTE AcEi-on: NorE PLANS ro PLANNTNG
LO./22./L998 GEORGE ACLiON: APPR iibm" o56oo-Frnn-oupAnrrqsvi Depts: FrRE Division:
10/12/L999 CHARLTE 4ction: APPR N/A iibm;'o!5oo-PuBlre woRtcs Dept: PIIB woRK Division:
**** * * r**** ** * * *** r***** ra*r* ** **t* * * i* ** **ri* *i * r* * r
See page 2 of this DocumenL for any conditions thaL may apply to this permit..
DECLARATIONS
I he!€by acknowledge lhae I have read ghls application, filled out in ful] thc lnfolhation rcquired, coBplctcd an accutate Plot
plan, and sEa!€ lhat alt t'he informalion plovided as requlred iE corrcc!. I agle€ to comply wilh lhe infonrElon and PLoE plan,
to comply r4iEh atl Toirn ordinanceE anil statse 1aw6, and to build this stsruccurc according to the tol|n'E zoning ana subdivision
codee, dclign lcwies approvcd, UniforB Buildlng code rnd other ordi.nances of the applicablc thcrelo,
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALIT BE MADE TWENTY' FOUR HOI'RS IN AD'VANCE BY
send clcan-Up Depogit To: PINvoN BUILDSRS
79-2138 OR d! OUR OFFI
FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER
o
Page 2 ********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS Permit #: 898-0325 as of 1-0/29/98 status---: ISSUED ********************************************************************************
Permit T)pe: ADD/ALT SFR BUILD PERMIT Applj_ed--: L0/22/L998 Appticant--: PINYON BUILDERS rEiued---t t\/29/L9gg 3038275793 To Expire: 04/27/1999
,fob Address: 756 FOREST RD Location---: 756 FOREST RD
Parcel No-- : 2LOL-072-L1-012
Description:
RENOVATE GARAGE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COnditiOns * * * * :l * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1. FIEI-,D INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.2. SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND EVERY STORY
AS PER SEC.r_2r_o 0F THE r_991 UBC.
3 - Approved to replace the exist structure "as is" only
;
SEaC.EDE Nuub.r: REC-0470 lnount,3 Et7.2s lol29fte L1.O9
PayEanE U.Ehod ! LC Nol.tion! 7040 rnlEr LC
PeniE No! B9E-0325 Ttp.: A-BUI'D IDD/.IIrT 8!R BlrrrrD Pt
Perc.l Not 21Ol -072 -11-012
giEs Addr.s. r 756 IORAET R.D
l,oc.cLon! ?56 EORIgI RD
tocrl fc..t 557.28
Ehlf Pal/lcnt ss7 .29 ToB.l MJ Pus. ! 557.25
Balrne€s .00
tccoung code D.Bcrilrtion Arounts
EP 00100001111100 BUII]DINO PERi{IT FEES 445,00
DR 00100003112200 DESIef REVIEW FEES s0.o0
pF 00100003112!00 PI,rN cHEcK FEES 169.25
lD D2-DEP0g cl,EAMr? DE9OgrTg 100.00
nc 00100003112800 wrrJrt ctlrl. INgEEctrolr tEE 3.00
'Contaci Eagle Councy
ac 970-328-8640 for
fr""
TOWN OF VATL CONSTRUCTTON
PERMTT APPLICATION FORM
DATET_/A ^ t?-qE
Assessors
'.\RCEL 0:X
PER.^\tIT #----etc7ztlcl2-
LegaJ- Description: Lot Block_ filing susplvlsroN,
5orJ Addr ess: {@*n.Es:_t=e_oi.rners Name:
Architect , lOarK elzttf- Address: ""t1" o^
Ph.
GeneraL Description:-u,'l
I,lork C1ass: [ ]-New [ ]-Alteration I
$uhber of Dwelling Units:
,t'
l-Additionat t$-nepair [ ]-other
Number of Accornnodation UnLts:
Fnber and Type of Fineplaces: cas AppLiances Gas Logs_ Wood/pellet
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VAIJUATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *l
?yIt?IIG: $-Zone Er,EcTRrcAL: $ orHER: $?LUMBTNG: T'- unqnN-iiiiii +_ *:_ ilil;;;f-
t*******************'********_CoN.TRACTOR INnORMAt'roN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *3eneraL ConLractort '{ltttop BotQcrs rf..'wn .rf \fa i.t Dz,rr rr,., t^r^ D.Town of vail Reg. No.ldo- n Phone Number: 8f)-.s?ft-\ddress : -|/. l. B o L mih{,'+eP = phone Nunber: _&Lff
tlectricat- contractoi: 8"8-o32 :reL,LrJ-scr.r \-\rrr\-rcrl;L(Jl: TOWn Of VaiI ReCr Nn tddress : ;;;;"-;,,;;;:, "-" ' '!r\r '
-
-
Phone Nurnber:
?lumbing Contractor:rddressi "^' --
---
_ 3;:l""fi"lill,-"_-"'-
:lechanical Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No._\ddress:
t*******************************FOR
]UTLDING PERMIT FEE:
.)LUMBING PERMIT FEE:
,IECHANICAL PERMIT FEE:
'TECTRTCAL
TEE:
)THER TYPE OF FEE:
)RB FEE:
; TYPE GROUP sQ. FT.
OFFICE USE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * rt :t rt rk rt eL rt
BUILDTNG PLAN CHECK F8E:
PLUMBTNG PI.AN CHECK FEE:MECHANICAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
CLEAN_UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAI., PERMIT FEES:
ATION BUTLDING:
STGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE!
CLEAN IIP DEPOSIT REPIIND Rnry^t 'UDEUS
t,-
75 south lron lage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 479-21.38 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I
rn summary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unl-awfur for any person to litter, track or deposit "nv =oif]'rJ"i, sand, debris or materiar, incrlding trash bumpsters, portable toilets and workmen vehicles.upon any streetl siaewaixl-;ii;y or public pl?:" or anv porribn tirei'eorl--rtt" right-oi-""y Ln a]r Town of Vaj.l streets and.Ig"g= is approxi^^l"iv-s"it.-lrl pavemenr.This ordinance w]Il be.;a.i:iiy"enforced by the Town of VaiL Public works Departrnent. p"r=6n= found vi;ratin; this ordinance wilL be given a 24 hour written n"ti""-t"-i!iJi"'.uia materiar..In the event the person so notified.aoe= noi "o*pfy with the notice within the 24 hour.tir.-=p..iii;e,"tt""irtric works Department wirr remove said mare;i;i-;r-ii,J"I"pli=e or person notified' The provisions or lt,i= ordlnance sharl not be applicable to cbnstruction, ,uinl"'urce or repair projects of any street or al_l_ey or any "iiiiii"r-'i; il"';i;ii_"_r.y.
To review ordinance No- o in fur-1 , please stop by the Town of vail BuiLding Department to obtain a copy. tiani. you for your.cooperation on this rnatter.
of f lce of communlly developmenl
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
l4ARcH l_6, L988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE
acknowledged
ositionTnefa€Lonsnlp
f6;/;a - z148
(i.e. contractor, owner)
o
75 soulh tronlage toad
vrll, colorsdo 81557
(303) 479-2L38 or 479-2139 ottlce of communlly devolopmenl
BUILDING PERIiIT ISSUANCE TIME FMITE
If this permi.t ""qri:::-? ]9w1 of Vait Fjre Department Approvat,Engineer''s (pubr i. trl_rl review unJ'upirrouur,' a FiJnnrni'bepartment review or Hea'tth Departmdnt review, unb'.-r"ui", fv"iii."iriiotns
Siri[ll!r,l;"[ll ""t'uted time for'a tot"r "eui"n-il.y"iuta'is r5ns
All commercial (larqe or sma.ll) and all mu.lti_family permits will have to folrow ine ibove r"nii6n.i-*l*ir* requirements. Residentiar and small projects shourd take a teiier"amount or time,'Hoiever, if residentiat or smailer,projects impiii .t'. viiiour-;;;;. rention.a depa rtmcnts wi th reqard' to- necessiiv-."ri",,, -ih;;; ;;;j;.ii"ruy also take the three weet< peiioA. 'v"r e"\rJs Pr .,J=LL)
Every.attempt will be ryge by this departnrent to expedite this permit,as sQon as possibie. ' -- v'rrLv'| !L er'
I:^l!" undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame.
Y /o --rL-7tr
r
Communi ty Develogrment Department.
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAY 9, 1994
WHEN A ''PUBLtC WAY PERMIT'' IS REQUIRED
Job Name:
Date:
Please answer the following questionnaire regarding the need for a ,public Way permit':
YES
ls this a new residence?
ls demolition work being perlormed ,1
lhat requires lhe use of the right . /\
of way, easemenls or public propefy?
ls any utility work needed?
ls the driveway being repaved?
ls diflerent access needed to site
other than existing driveway?
ls any drainage work being done
affecting the right of way, easements,
NO
K 1)
2l
K
K
Y
x
)(
3)
4)
5)
6)
or public property?
7) ls a "Revocable Right Of Way permit"
required?
I have read and answered all above questions.
8) A. ls the righl of way, easemenls or ..,
public property to be used for staging, l\
parking or lencing?
B. lf no to 8A, is a parking, slaging
or fencing plan required by Community :
Development?
lf you answered yes to any of these questions, a 'Public Way permit" must be obiained."Public Way_ Permit' applications may be obtained at the Public Work's otfice or at
C9.ry1u1ity Development. lf you have any questions please callCharlie Davis, the Town of Vail Conslruction lnspector, at 479-21Sg.
91r ol.ut,o
or's Signature
P, rt./6-tL-rt
Date Job Name
Town of Vail
froPY tWlawq'wltffi ,{oNNstL
Flre
n
:-j
nap 'wt{M
wtp
Qnrw@ q}ollb.lb
flt?v\L
U.\i
\
ol
A,{0 /
lM\iftBfto^l trMt*
s
$?
z t
s 3
$s
MF
NAA v&
-r--MW @
l,WOt
Date Receive
()CT 2 2 1998
|va6we
*\
-{-- -z-iJ-:'i L'-
sJ@) 04xru
l,WOt'J)
*QtoW'
IWeQ"ac.
gAos
1ct prevent th3 building
ot Permlt 19 U.B C.
permit 0r approval of ptans an(
to be a .psrmit tor. or an
ons of this cod€
The lssuanca ot
the
0th0t
I9Ab{&Te
F^lttrl,
fugrlaoe
fu
,',n rt/O;d?!
{ Ittb
-F-
-r
-
--- ---
- -t -ar
E
-a
nat i b.ttw, -ft{q{, $*ft{stw z
3'W
$.:j
e;
)E
v{i
'--lto"
WUlbtnrUoo
ftgs*
$s$
F$$H
o
$*
3=--.
Rr
*
\
g
R
E$
s
N
N
$
.N
'J l's
. .' 'a'1
$$$
s s +
$$s$s
I
*l 'nl
+-
>€
E$st s.€
5S
ts
EaS
$$
N$
SN
$><
$$.$
TEI
rS'
$$
.s
s!-
\)
-.\
*
s :$
-\$t
a ri
tr}?
i?
.e
\Jd
-$E
t
l/illu 0W\4 h4(rrurr
[Wfuu]^t(r a^A
NhqMnnlfwu ML WIN#
-"(\yly^nwd6a
ilvto' *
('ftn6varlmat/
l-tAtuw Nwil
awt a,o q,((
M? tnt^tn"tlwE
o l'/"'o'c'
6,MW{ h,tfi
tlon
wvlwwnil/
hib*ifl^'e 6ilsfo,c.
%naFt 9
glM,mb Por43/a
o o
tt0fc*+ o-
Ylfl9{tttU I
0)l6Wm,rr,
W6^lWroh W
lwll\awxrw
tfrfuroWwtMfI
4? ADY/^,/Nb Uillr ,f)-' --A-^ t All Wttuava 4 4
M wso ltuac.
N5 Wwaw o t/'z,c.
M*ws e t6,,/,c,
tN'tll*ova'tat
'Nl lueartfu Ar,L$grzS
0r@"7 a,o 4.(T
Ltrr|*Yq Aer$, t tl
Vd('r,uB ea|t,c,lilb"
a^
.k5wqsolr"o,c
6,*5 ws
7l2t'
ztm,wa wv/a
o o
frAutw fa{LW
V" EruA uarJ{a ul/ l-tAbu(x 'ftNqnE 6\E{2}/ ho 4. r.
/i0 unntoaw{s
0 ($"0,c,
6ohw,
a"Mwpt - @rr(, \
)tr6wsov)'ac,
w)u@ b"lNTD 6r9VMh0 ,iabir@"/ +LVIW+N/q&
'[u['s egi:ac.
oho\td t)tki'
r I s
-\N m)&.
MVWseti'ar-
aqs b
(ottttm
O.li't
''+J "'D. I a.
t-
L
'el;:i;riil*+:f
i::ii'll",slifr i*11i:tiiii+""3::
iootlnge are to bBar upon nalurll undiBturb.d loil or Cllt€d
rtructun), !1Il a3 lFFrovao Dy tbc enqrne.!.
2) Atl founatatLon lround perlDet.r ot .tructure shall have r,rlnlrtrun
f.ort plo!.ction of {8i to bottorr of footlnE. All foundatlon
vallB and colurna to bo o.nl€r€d on concr.te footlnqE unl..E
ehorrn olherrrJ.! on PLana.3) All c!!t In placc concr.t€ rust be ladc alth Portllnd cehent
and attlln nlnl'luD corpr.lalvc strerEth of 3000 p61 alter 28
d!y3, IrGslgn b!.od ulD|| EuILorNc coDE REQUIREUEr{IS rOR
RaIIaoRCED Cor|CREIE (lcl 318), 1992. III concrete alab€ on
Er.d. Du6t be provtal.d control JolDt. (Ecored ol cut) 1n
accordance rlth sotl! !.port. All expogeil cdgc6 of concrete
Ehall hav€ l/2i chlrpfar. cohcrete volk .hrll not hEve any
horlzontrl cold Joln!3 unI.r, ruthorlzed by th. .tructur.l
eDglna.r. rteld c@rdlnate rll v.rtlcal cold Joints vtth
Etructural anq'lncer.
4) R.lnforcing .t€.I iB Asl'M Graale 40. Alt eetded tire labrlc
iurt confon r,lltr ,rETl A185. R€lnforceDent pl.c€ncnt 3ha]1
conforn vtth IIANUA! OF sTAllDlRD PRACTICE, 1990 as prePrr€d by
cRsI. A1l 1rp .pllcc6 to b€ !inhu!! 16 bar dlaDet.rE, all
horlsontal rainforclng st€el to lta contlnuouE arouDd cornerE
and rt raII interaectlons. l.llhlbue rsiDforceiant protection:
-concreta poured agalnst llrth 3n
-concrct. pour4lh forD€
-Erabr t 1{
t) All llEbcr rhaLl te Douq-PLr 12 s4s or better, al1 eolnrntzed
runber rhrll l'€ 8.n-PIr 12 atls or b.!t€r (a11 Iurtb€r l,lthin 18rl
of flnlalt grrda rust be volDanlt.d). Provide Bollil blocktnq
!t 8,-on on ccntcr ln !11 diaphr6gns. All coluhDa to be
cortl.uou6 blaring to founddtton,
6) Al1 Trutblt tr.alg. Anchors .ril Ra!!a!a to be lndtall.d according
to hanu!actur€tr speolllcdtlona,
' tt :l$3iiH.l:':""1 :;'.o'""":Ji:'"T:T"'i:J"'TT"".JJ?SfiJ"*
aletallE. AII buil,!-up veraal.D b.!D. Duat be glued vlth PL4o0
lnd nallod sith 2 rov. o! 16d Bplkca e 9" oc, l€tal X-Br.clng
reguired 8,-0i oD cent€r lD all dtaphrlgrs. AII alt.rDrts6 to
be revlcred by .ngln.ar.
a) sh€lttr roof ritlr I r,/8' T and G plFrooal nllh nlnhun EI,an
ratlnq ot aol20 or b.ttar and glu. nlth P!100. 6c!.v plyrrood
P 5n oc to r1l raftara.
9) sbelth all .rterlor rall.3 rith r./2n pu'lrood or orlcnted atrand
borrd trlth linhu! .pan rrtlng of 2{,/0 or b€ttcr. Natl rlth
sd i 6i oc !t p!n.I 6alg€. anal l2r oc .t lnler|eallat atude.
r0) rlva loldg urcd tor d.61gn-
-Roof-loo p.f anov.
-rloor-ao l'3f r..Id.nthl.
-Blnd-25 prf,
-Earthqual.-lon. r Oac.
lt) All con.tructlon ru.t oolply rlth the 1991 Untforh Buttdtng cod. la .dopt€d by th. Iot,n o! vrll Bulldlng D.partoen! lnd th.
'c.n.r.l condltlon! of th€ contract for conrtructlon. |AIA Docu!€nt AzOl). All constructlo. nuct b€ cobpl€ted $lthtn th€tol€lanc.3 d..crlb€d lD the .BoEldertlal Constructlon Perloruncc Cuid.lln.ir !r preprred by thc NATIoI|AI, ASSoCIATIoN
OF IIOIIE EUII,DERA.
r?) conrlruct rallr .. follor.-
-Exl€rlor-2r6 € L6i oc.
.. ) ^ii';::i,r-i:i"f"'liu'i;i.*l'li"'ll"i"3loiiii'i:,,6 or bca,!3
oR b€ hung ulth SIUPSON Strong-ti. hanger:s or approved equal6.l.ll conn€ctton haralsare ai Dlrnuf.clur€d by SItrPsoN Strong-Tle or epFoved .gu!l..
14) All .ttuctur.l lcbb.rr lra ahonn In thelr ltnll Dosttlons prop.rly brlcod and .upported, durlng constructl6n lt nay b.nec..rary !o ehor. porllonr ol tho Etructure rhlle orhsr portlona ars balng constructod. Conllct th. Etructurat engln..r fot consultation ra requlr.al.
15) Contrrctor l. r6cpon.ibl. fo! a1t non-.peclfled connectlonE,contact .tructur.I angin .r for d.trih !3 roqutred. EnglD66r to appEov. all alructurrl rub.tltutlon..16) contractor l. to coordlnat rll dlaphraE! p€nstrlllonr chiDneyr, plu.lbfutg rca6r., €tc.) tbrouqh floor3, roof! anat foundatlon vall. vlth lppropriat. ruD-contraclors. ceneral contrrctor 1r rarponaibl6 fo! DeaDa, bethodE, tcchnlques,ee!lu.ne€., procedlulc.. 9orloanEhLp lnal Job-Elt. .al6ty aEroclal.d rlth thl. proJ.ct. c€n.ral, Contrrctor !o v€rlty all allb.naion. .nd al.vatlons rlth lrchlt€ctural atlrxings. Notlfy cDElns.t of dLl confllcts or ori''l,on6 b€tv€en vallou3 €Ienen!.of th. voltlng dlarlnga and th..xlsting conditlons b€lore of th. vortlng dlarlnga and th. .x,co!! nclng rlth that portlon ol tha
th. .xlsting conditlons I o! tha proj€ct. c.neral contr.ctor to ln.p.ct r6llodel ploJcct. and verity prlor use andt prop.r dlEpos.l of .xl.tlng nat.lirl. (1.e. a6b€.!os, etc,) ai requlr€d by cod6.17)
^11
Dltariak .xpoactl to .xtsrior hd/or nolsture condltion..hell b€ tr€.taal lor !haa. condltlon! (Is, chcrlcll treEtrent,ttalnlng, pllntlng, d.lprooftng, D.Dbrlneg, fl.lhing, etc.) .;requlred by cod.. AII Dat€riel. to b. tr.atctl lor flr€raalatrnc€ ar taqulr€d by coda,
"ab(eG{
e40
u%L a(w?pal^
a\MDW+t%,\rrt qbw(Am fM"e._6/G
,*I
{
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
REPT131
a6l t 7/ 1999
Qou,* oF vArL,(I8:35 REEUESTS - INSF.ECTN I,IORK
o t6/
BqB-etseE 6/t7/L9 Type: A-BUILD Statusl ISSUED ConstrI A$FR
756 FORE$T RD
756 FT]REST RD
e101-a7a- 11-erlE
RENOVATE GARAFE
F.INYON BUILDERS
GENERAL COMFIUNICATIONS INC
F,INYT]N BUII.DERS
trOLORADT]
SHEETS FOR 17l 1999
F'AGE
AREA: CD
I
I
frctivity:
ffddre s s l
Locat i on l
F,aree I r
Descr"i pt i on:
Appl i eant r
Bwner'I
Cont r"act or:
Occ l
Fhone:
F,hone:
Fhone:
Use; V N
3A38e75793
34.rSe75793
Inspect ion Reque st
Requestsr: JOHN
Req Time: tZtE:tZtO
Items neeueEted to
014090 BLDG-Final
Informatl:".....
Comments l 9O4-58O{r
be Inspected... f;e
trhone r 837-5793 _ EARAGE/DIRT ON TNF.
10n Eomments
CELL
Ti me Exp
I
I
I
Inspection Histor'y.. ..,
Item: ttr8:iltzr driveway grade f inal
Item : tZtEBlA BLDG-Foot inEs/Steel
LI/e7 /qA lnspeetot': JRM
Item r TAOAEIA BL-DG*For-tndat ion/5teeI
1el18/98 Inspector: CD
Iternr rzilz'5so F,L.AN-ILC Site Flan
Item : OgrOSut BLDG*Fr"aming
IE/L4/9e Inspector": GRG
Item: Ut0rZt4Er * * Not trn File * *
Item : $UitlSB BLD$-IneLrlat i on
Item: AtAraGtA BLDG-Sheetrork Nai 1
Item: Bfira60 * * Not 0n Fr le x *
Item : tAUttlT0 BLDG-Misc.
Item r Aql€tgrA FLD6*Final
Ibem: O453fi BLDG-Temp. Cln
Itern: B€r54U' BLDF-Final C/O
Act i on ; AtrF'R AtrPROVEI)
Action: AFFR APFRUVED
Act i on ; AF'trR APF'RUVED
a
L
t;I
"l
!:,oz OD 'o OU o
a i !t t
A
ct
'Fr 33 dE q'(
?
o
o
o o
o
JE fi8
FH
EE
*
E
g E
E
E
g
E
F
o
ct
ot c !A {H D o r 1..OH ).t!
F8 o.E A
o9 rA otl cr El o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Y t,D
I ra
e
c E a I
F o
dl o|
|{o
g
e
A
E a I E U
E
a tq
G'
EE
LO Ei
&
E 4
FIH
BE
E3 aD4 p
e
BE
ig
E
E
FI F'H2 dtE
EI
F
a
?
E H
a
E
I
E IE flT so I d"
B E8
a l.a
E
H
E A A
h 6
T
AI
o
E E E c
F t o.E A
:
::
6|D
^Et Errr
ll to g8s
EEE
IJJ
)
G
9
z
o
z
F o
!Li.il2 i i i -* v=a r:-: z=-z 4: =;:7:2aa iZtPa.z z a Zl z i ::-c _E - a 2l44z 2
t i i
= =a ,a'!a->.- a' '-= c
l- ! I - --,J - - ' =.= ?-; ! z::7i.i:
= 7.! ..+ i
.: . '! 7 -.i 1 i-= ! '= i.i I : €
J. ?E i'=aata.;1=z=:i=- !' I a= ;:JZlt!=
2r
TJ u)
I
,i
.!l \i
N
Fl o\o\
C\
&rd
:FI ts
H ID
ts \o
1.1
Fl Fl H
Fl
v
Fl
C.l
F
Fr
F .A
&
h
\o
F
oo
z
t)z
H
F
f-l z
E E
z
bt
]
'-
U
F
ln \o
@
z
crr
I
H F z H a ti
v2
T4 x
o
U
3
z rd
F-l (t)
rd &
z
IA z frf
E<tt
z
^F-() - t!;tq Y*-<>x
\v|{>zz as<Ei;<=:af<\J ;a\:r
z-Y =z=3-!-isz
- k] v
- c( r,.FtrZ zLrx lrJ --'\ -'i
lF<='*J I-- -J
<14ca
\ ca it
oi r z 3FF
s9=*<-FdY o;<F?>,
t'- iL >>Z.)x <-v
?=+u FFtrQ q.l
ilto>
*J LJ q4 F LrJ ->
=<uo .">-HfSs ^<r<x vFr\-
Ll- fr ia :F>oy ffi;ei u5X=
-FYl +xg+liir\l t- \J .> t-
+a ts
-e.ts (F (F
tli
l.a d rt
Aa
FR
tfl ts
-t rf-a d al-
F
F
trt ff-a F
!H f,r\
{=7
F t{:F?
-trl |e
:fl l-l r-
-l a
*Fr F H H f\
=v tH
11
A.{-r
E f-t rF rF.rP +rl
|{A.o
ct z
E
=E
uJ o-
F t\
O (>
o
<\t
o o
o
U)
IJJ ul u-
ts
=
IJ,J .L
t,{JqI!N
1i
lliE='
Ni *
$G (r E
I1..,, 6
JrS
dEs
F
F
e.F
z
=
z z
d q
d
4
,A cl d q
>l g
s q
in lu
o z
z
J
co
€
o z z o N
(d
I ro
or
=r (r)
x
ccl
o Pa
c,,o-(/,
= ''-L
.ot cr(U
- .1.,(JC
lJJ c L.
P (u.!<
J-OC
a;*:r
E.e *€!
EgE;I
;[;fg
;:*: l
iEiF;
it:;t
c.; ge g
SEiei
€Eig!
:EEtg (! 0'-.. -!;ourc
e*!e€
i;eic
i;$ei
(f
F
(f
rc)
rc)
@ r-{
IJ)C'
ro
N
N
o
|r)O
(\l
o
sl
rf,6l
(r1
@ (r,
=uJ
z
J
.D
-
tll
(J z )o-
a F
gJ
J
UJ
o z
CO
=J
J
z
f
C)
UJ
UJ lu
z
tr
tu
uJ
o
B g
UJ
z
6
IJJ o
F
o
ur
I
z
uJ J
x
F
LIJ th
(t)
UJ ttl t!
F
=E tu c
J
F o t-
a z
!
6
J
o c
F ()ul
uJ
2 o
=
o-
o z
UJ E
NOtM'rVA
(u
+'
c)
!-+,rn
"ul
Yv=
;;
ov4
3a
ES
()c
So
l+)<'r-rct
HE o
\G\i-t \J
=-Q ltn.S
=oN
zz oo
xfz 890
=>6>tL<o*
9U FO .i(\i
z
tr
cc
uJ
F
O
O
I
uJ
x
J
z
E
z
G tll F
B
IIJ z
II tl II II
lt)
2 f z 9vt ko o<
=F gq
<z
=z ,.
9=
-F fio 3tr
I
F
t o
Jl <l
FI
=l
zl
.. >l 6
u.l o ul
UJ z
=
IJJ
o-
J
z
E
uJ f J J
E
a
IJJ z
i F
2 o
F
J
a z
ql
Fl
I
d.
lcc ol{ltd urlu)
H'.k -oH
,1,ro
vl
z,
g
L (u{J O(!F_c F
z,
c
J
a )
i
F
uJ
IL o o E
o
(o
(f)
I
g)(!
@
F{cf o
sf @
uJ F
o
uJ ,tr
@ o o -z o
F
TL
uJ Y
UJ o
o F
F
^G IT
o-
lt lo t>
'(L ro
I
UJ F o z
z (,=zz
>z
t-,8
EEi dd=
ts
llJ
o-
IL o
IJJ
z
l (r,
L
r.
a
JF H=:tr o- uJ >o.OE 9o \ul
:>Lr t-uJ J J
lr-
ur dl o F
c o
E
CI o o
o E
'E
3
E
E
8
o
e,
E r t o !
E
=E
lrJ o-z o F (J
E,
6 z o ()
drn
JI Ela I 'Flto I
-o tro I El'-r I fl I f,l I rl gl
5l sl-
'-l 5l$
Hl fl3
31 9s dlt
HPI
ol
uJl cl
JI
<l il
3
I
I
I
.l
el
dl
HI ,l
sl
IU
;t 5 ot ut Ft l-
(u
(J
o)
U'
o)
c o o
qJ
o)+)a/,
i,i
=z
..f1 o -)
q)
IU
E
!
tn
o,L o t!
(o
ro t\
I
I
I cl ol tnl
ol
o.l
3l ql
I .r)l ol
-l
I
I
I ul E
4
v
v7
o z,
=tr
I
I
I
I
I l<f lr-{(Y) lF\.-,j Sltd col(o IN x lsf ol
l(J IA
ut d-CI tF d(6 <l>iE
=o
s
I or sf
I
I
-l Ir)l Nl
-.1
ol zl
dl
5|>l
bl
zl
el FI
(J
L +,(J
c,
LLI
.tJ
5 ..r
E
tr
<t z
=lJ-
E?+t o2
C)
sF
3E d6 o
z
?
c)
uJ
=
E
-rO <F GO
IJJ <zF L!F
o (.)
c;
CJ o .o
sJ\.O.H >l cf\cxf)aoo
i
2
,
E8!
now in your custody or control.
p.,r. May 5, 1987
^*,'u r",' Plaintif f
DISTRICT cOURr.EAGLE COUNTY .",_o*Hbc€
-7
CASE NO.86 Cv 101
E SUBPOENA (Personal)
O SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE (Subpoena duces tecum)
Cl.rrlDcpury
This subp<xna is issucd pursuant to Rutc {5 of the Colorado Ruk:s of Civil Prc.ccdure.
RETURN OF SERVICE
State of
County
I declare under oath that I served this subpoena or subpoena to produce on
County on
! by (State Manner of Service)
! I am over the age of 18 years and am not interested in nor a party to this case.
Signed under oath before me on
--Name
I Private process server
Notary Public'n Sheriff,
Fee $
Mileage $
I 'Notlry shosld includc address lnd expir,rtlon dat.: ofcommisrion.
The People of the State of Colorado::q.,
GARY MORAN
plaintiff and FIRE INSURAI'ICE EXCHAI'68
defendant and also to produce at this timc ariu place 1lf Applicable):
T\t!;qrm€. rJtjft|\ tdlc, no. "4:! no hcldv.'Thiee 'Piiik" CCniiei, #1000
1515 Arapahoe Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone : 592-1515
in
at_
Ti'n€
at the followins location:
Date
County
il
l!
No. t97. Rev. 2.83. SU I]|'O!:NA 0md foril l, bli\hinr, lnl5 w. 6rh Ave.. l-llc*dod. Co 80: t.r - (]{B} :l t-690t)
Dist,rict COURT,
85 cv l0I
COUNTY _€g-Ea+le- , COLORADO
CASE NO.
! TUBPOENA (Personal)
tr {UBPOENA TO PRODUCE (Subpoena duces tecum)
The People of the State of Colorado:
TO: --You are orde-red to attend and give testimony in the -€l+stsriets Court of Eagle County
at3+4fp-m- May r2811987 ats the Eaglg €quntf DisEr*e€ €enrt (location)
en (date and time), as a witness for - e f enda+t
in an action between
plaintiff and
defendant and also to produce at this time and place (ff Applicable):
now in your custody or control.
Dzfe M^i' '\4 1oo?
etomer ror ------Ei-r€-@
Type nam., addrers tcle m, .eg no below
ClerL/D.pur)
RETURN OF SERVICE
State of
County
I declare under oath that I served this subpoena or subpoena to produce on
County at
-
at the following location:
Tim.
! by (State Manner of Service)
E I am over the age of l8 years and am not interested in nor a party to this case.
Signed under oath before me on
Name Date
! Pnvate process server
Notary Public'n Sheriff,
Fee $
ln
rNotary drould include expimtion date of coxunissioo.
Mileage $
No, 197. Rev. 2-83. SUBPOENA Bradfor.l Publish ins. 5tl5 w. 6t h Ave.. Lakewood. CO t0: l4 - ( 301) :l1'6900
I1&Eva
County
h
ao
(Yt
N
EI
o z
t-c)
I.IJ -)o E
o-
",l \l
ml -{
F.l
ul F
o
F
=E
lrJ
o-
z o z
?|!o zr c0o
=z l:)
CL Lr-
"3q =^r3
;Hg
nn!
---
g o
E c o
o
o E
.E
tr-ql-F=F(l x l,u ;o-6t!;o 6p E>tF 6 o o E
o z
t
=t
UJ o.
'f -(
sE:t?
rr-EiF -<9,"9 LF-^:< :. y z F :trYF dq "E*.-i 3;;ii E 3:?:s i<azd TzzA)i::ge 9<O <a!dz:;ii3i 9iu'?F3ei3 lFrcc Q>-(/)<o*-eE!<ar<l!J
NOIJ.VN]VA
:<
=zztL o oo F^oz X r Z:J r9oE ooe,Z!O oon ozX r!<9q i P-G tf x u.r a;z '. ': uJ dN(J
Ir
tl tl | .ql :< iil J rs'rl
ll
$l
l(,tz b -,1 i\J
JII
'-l ,d F
b0
.r{
.l
d .p
E
l.{
al
ui
=
{
t!
z
LU
o
=
=c
IJJ tr
o
J F
.'l
EI (5l
9tl
fit
a
q
a },1 .r'!
(g P
E
=tr
trt
R
cn
X I a
u.,!J e
J
=
s I
f
I
'i
c
llJ
)
=tr
a tu E
=tr
a
LIJ
o
J a =tr
a o
IJJ
o o
.J a
r (L
F
t
uJ
F
C)
IJJ F
I
E
-rO X <F I fr? E ZE 11
TIJ F o6
(J
JE <o C)F
FS t o
E 2?
=#d6
9 z
I
I.IJ
=
5
v
2
ch 9i *E o2
()
J <()nfr fo
z 9 F o
=E F a z o o
Etr!
I
-
75 south frontage road
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138
(303) 479-2139
olfice of communlty development
September 12, 1991-
Mr. and Mrs. A. Emmet Stephenson
General- Communications, Inc.
899 Logan Street, Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80203
Re: LoL L2, Block 1, Vail Village 6th
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Stephenson:
I noticed that the weeds in the front planier have been cut. It. is apparent that you have planted pfisters in the front pLanter.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Because of the extended period of time that has lapsed since your
temporary certificate was originally issued, the staff believes it is now reasonable to issue a final Certificate of Occupancy for the residence.
However, any future property improvements will require review of Lhe existing landscaping, and addit.ional landscaping may be reguired as a condition of approval .
We are requesting that you have the weeds cut over the wlro1e yard.Possibly 2 or 3 times per summer would be enough. This is not a requirement, but we would appreciate this. Weeds are not attractive and tend l-o lessen the value of the property, as well as the value of adjacent property.
If you have any questions, please feel free to cal1.
Sincerely, ,--l
.,t w,rJ / -7t,
Betsy Bosolack Planning Technician
luwn lltl
75 soulh trontags rc8d
Yall, colorado 81657
(3GD 4792138
(3{ts) 479.2139
office of community development
September 4, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. A. Erunet Stephenson
General Communications, fnc.
899 Logan Street, Suite 500 Denver, Colorado 80203
Re: Lot !2, Block 1, Vail village 6th
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Stephenson:
The Communj-ty Development Department is attempting to close outstanding files. Your residence on the above property received variances in 1.985, and a building permit for a garage, but has not yet received the final certificate of occupancy.
In order to issue a final certificate of occupancy, sre must require that the landscaping be completed. However, it is difficult to discern landscaping because of the weeds in the yard and planters.I visited the site on Sunday, Septernber L, L99L, and spoke with Mrs. Stephenson. She stat.ed that she would contact someone to remove the weeds. Please contact my office when the weeds have been removed, and I will look at your property again to see if additional landscaping is required.
Thank you for your cooperation.
do not hesitate to call.If you have any questions, please
Mg/.-{Planning Technician
75 soulh fronlage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 4792138
(303) 47$,2139
Septernber 8, 1989
Mr. A. Enmet Stephenson c/o ceneral Communications, Inc.
LOO Garfield Street Denver, Colorado 80206
Dear Emmet,
First of all- I would like question until this issue
address yesterday and was
removed.
,ft1u'Mr yltto
oflicc of community dwelopmenl
to thank you for rernoving the sign in can be resolved. I did drive to the pleased to see the sign had been
I have further researched the issue and consulted with our attorney on this matter. The position of the Town is that this type of sign is not acceptable in a residentail neighborhood.As stated in Section 16.20.OLO(C)2(d) the display oi a window sign is permitted for a business or organization- in CCI , CC2,CSC, HS, PA, HDMF and SDD zone districts. your property is located in the P/S (prinary/secondary) zone district.
Also pursuant to Section L6.2O. 1G0(A), the only tlpe of real estate signs permitted in Town are temporary site development
:igT?. l: yoo will note fron the enclosure, these are pirmitted to identify a developnent under construction in HDlltF, pA, CSC,CCl, CC2, SD, MDMF, L,,DMF, and RC zones.
r an encrosing both of those portions of the code which r have referenced in the above portions of this letter. Larry Eskwith has also offered to provide you with case law that supports the regulation of signage as it relates to private resideirles. rf you have any further questions concerning this issue please contact me at 479-2138., f hope on this issue we can igree to disagree and the sign will rernain down.
Jo,)
Scbnlan
Environmental Health/Zoning officer
lor*.*or coMMUNrcAroNs. tNc.O @ruwd'(/o%
IELEPHONE (303) 355-6000
IOO GARFIELD STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80206
August 23, L989
Ms. susan Scanlon
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road Vail' Colorado 81557
Dear Susan
Eollowing up our telephone conversation, I am sending you this letter so that you can pursue a legal review with your legal
depa.rtment regarding the Stephenson Properties sign in the window at 756 Forest Road.
You have reguested that I remove it pursuant to city
ordinances regarding signs in commerciaL establishments. I have
been advised that the statute does not apply to residential property when the sign is inside the building. Further, there is a constitutional question of whether you can direct the owner of a home as to what he can or cannot do inside his own house. I appreciated your cooperative attitude during our conversation,and I an planning to remove the sign at least tenporarily when I
am in Vail this coming weekend in a spirit of cooperation until
we can resolve this dispute favorably or at least agree to disagree. As you know, the sign is not ostentatious and, in fact, is barely visible from the street. Nonetheless, I am interested in generating interest in the property and do not want to be forced to list it with a real estate broker and pay an exorbitant real estate conmission just to sell it. Please give ne a cal-l once you have spoken with the city attorney.
yours
Stephenson, Jr.
AES,/j w
M,t.e,&WaVa^4n
75 louth fronlago road
vall, colorado 81657
(3(x') 4792138
(30:l) 4792139
August 4, 1989
Mr. Bob o'Neil
1O0 carfield th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80206
olffcs of community development
Dear lt{r. Garfield,
Your name was given to me as the party responsible for handling the house at 755 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado. I am writing to you regarding the sign in the window at this address which reads rrMarketed by Stephenson Properties 355-1800n. This sign has not received any approvals for display by this department and in fact is not perrnitted through our sign code.
I{e must take this opportunity to ask that the sign is removed as
soon as possible. I realize this may be slightly inconvenient on a tight deadline, but we would ask that the sign is rernoved by Monday, August L4, 1989 at 9:00 Alil. If this deadline poses
any problems or if you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me prior to August l-4th at (303)479-2L3e.
We are looking forward to your coopbration in the timely resolution of this rnatter.
Environmental Healthr/Zoning officer
'r
-d
,P
*o ta.l
x.
.cp
I
I
I
I
I
..t
I
I
I )4
!/l
ih{ln 1
.4
rJl
Ll
*.r I
.il dl
I rl
"ll
:,1
-<l tL+
r.rl
-Fl v{
I
:ll :l 'rl
'-l
Yi
.:.:
tr.!
I 4i ii
I
.l
t,,t
, ".i
)
I
a \{-
-ur
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTEDJ
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEt,.l
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Coat'<gL - G>" S)€G )" DlJrft O €zssro.u
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:Date
Comments:
PUBLIC WORKS
Reviewed by:
RECREATION DEPART4ENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
'"ry''Ff'
.{i .Ii
Project'Neme:
Project Description:
Conlact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Project Appllcation
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot l^}-..,,,,,,n 'jm.l ti,lhti (t* , '.""Block
Comments:
j'
Design Review Board
Dale
Motion by: l,r)nrrt\ri
\
7,
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
-t
DISAPPROVAL
lrr\\\\l \F.
I
i.--3*
Date:
Town Planner Staff Approval
75 soulh tronlage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
June 26, 1985
olllce ol communlty developmenl
A. Enmet Stephenson, Jr.
General Communications, Inc.
899 Logan Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
Re: Lot L?, Block l, Vail Vi'llage 6th Filing
Dear Enmet:
At the June 24, .l985 Planning and Environmental Commiss'ion meeting,
the PEC gave unanimous approval to your variance request. The request
included a side setback variance of 14 feet and a front setback variance of 20 feet in order to construct a garage. The Planning and Environmental
Commission stipulated that when the proposal was reviewed at the Design
Review Board, special attention should be given to the materials and re-
lationship of the roof to the wing walls. l,|e have tentatively scheduled
the Stephenson garage for our July 3, 1985 Design Review Board meeting.
l,le feel that more detajled drawings are necessary'in order to real1y
understand how the garage will look. Please let me know what you wish to
do regarding this matter of the Design Review Board meeting.
Please call me if you have any further questions.
Si ncerely,
Kit^ ?t'h
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP: br
_4|l-r-i:Er.r-ra-+EFi:I 1 .,.', l
Project Appllcation I I
o"" €/ av/ gs '
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Cqntacl Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:11 .(a+;ont
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal D€scription: Lot lA , Btock ririns V., \ [1. rL?c 6 ]t
, zon€
Comments:
Design Review Board * +lz/6f
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
:
Summary:
Town Planner o",", 13/gt
E statt Approval
F**f:'
2:15 Pm
3:00 pm
l.
2.
3.
4.
Pl anning and Environmental Commission
June 24, 1985
Site visits
Public Hearing
Approval of minutes of meetings of May 2g and June 10.
Appointment of PEC member to DRB for July, August and September
Presentation of final plans for Ford and Donovan parks.
Request for side and front setback variances in order to construct a qaraoe on Lot .|2, Block l, Vail Village 6th Filing.Applicant: A. drnet Stephenion, Ji. '
Request to amend an approved developnent plan to allow for a bro year interim development plan'for the Golden peat ifi Base area. Appl.icant: Vail Aslociates, Inc.
5.
SUBJECT: A request for a side setback variance of 14 feet and a
front setback of 20 feet in order to construct a qaraqe
on lot .|2, Block 1, Vail Vjllage 6th.
Applicant: A. Emmet Stephenson, Jr.
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
This variance request was previousiy reviewed by the Planning and Environmental
Commission on February 25, .l985, and March 25, .l985. At the March 25 meeting,
the Plannjng Commiss'ion denied both the side setback variance of 14 feet and
a front setback variance of 20 feet. Mr. Stephenson appealed the PEC decision to deny the request. The Vai I Town Council also den'i 'ei the applicant,s
appeal at the'i r Apri I l6 meeting. Since that time, Mr. Stephenson has been
working with the staff to arrive at a proposal that will decrease the encroachment
as much as possible. Mr. Stephenson is proposing to reduce the s'ize of the
garage to the original 26 feet in length. The existing wing walls will remain
on the structure, however the roof will be pulled back so that the entire lenqth of the garage is only 26 feet. The length of 26 feet corresponds exactly to the originally approved length of the garage. The width of the garage will
remain at .l3.4 feet. Because the w'ing'walls will remain and the-width of the
garage stays the same, the 20 foot front setback variance and the l4 foot side
setback variance are still necessary for this request. The 20 foot front setback
variance is 8 feet greater than the original l2 foot variance, and the 14 foot
side setback variance is three feet qreater than the oriqinal ll foot variance.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
The attached table
..' PEC pl ans, building
Planning and Environmental Commission
Conrnunity Development Department
June 24, .l985
shows the differences in the gqrage dimensions among the
permit plans and as-bu'i lt plans according to the most recent
:;;i7:jmprgysment s urvey.
ERIA AND FINDINGS
n review of Criteria and Findin Section .l8.62.060 of the Muni ci pa I Code,
epartmen recommen s apDrova ues t var't ance
acrors:
,,;, fl9 rglatlonshiq o
ano slruclures in the vlc'tnitv.
_:!
Staff does bel'i eve that by removing the roof of the garage and recessing the garage door back to its ori ginal location, the encroachment sjtuation ii greatly improved. Public Works has also stated that this solution solves thejr c6ncerns
stephensor| 6/24/85
about the parking on.the.publ ic right-of-way and snow removal problems. The wing wal] on_the east sjde of the garage wltl also Ue cui-uacr in order to match the wing wall on the property to the eist of the garage. - ifiis solution decreases the encroachments to the greatest possible extent-witiout requiring tnit it,"- -
9lvn9r completely tear down the front portion of the garige. It should be noted that the winq wail on the west side of tne property is uieo as a retaining warl for the staiilvay coming inio irre'unii. It was felt that there wourd be ress of an impact on adjacent properties if the stone-wori"".rii'n"o rather than removing the wing wall so that the stairs would be eipoieO.
The deqree to which reiief from the strict or literal inte retation and enforce-nt ot a sDec regulation is necessar to achieve com atrDl IItv a uni formi t of treatment among sites in ThE-viciniW or to attain ectives o this title without granL@
of the ues vari ance on ht and air, distrjbution of I ation ation a traffi c acilities ic facilities and utilJties ano
Such other factors and criteria the commission deems licable to the proposed variance.
In the previous request, Public works was concerned about snow removal and parking
?Ib]!Ts created by the garage encroachment. Given the new proposal, the parking anct snov, removal concerns are addressed. For the rosi-pJri,'ilrb impicii-ot- '''
the garage should be positive on the d.istriortion ot trairic in that parking will be removed off the street us mu.n as possible, and the new parking area grisinow conjtructed in front of ttre unit. Essentially, the present proposal :is.rexactly the same as the originally approved p"Jpoiut-eicept for the wing .wall encroachments.
Staff believes that the applicant is proposing a reasonable solution to a difficult problem.. By.puiling the garage back io its oitginal size, staff feels that rne-apprlCant rs not receiving special treatment. By approving this variance the P'l anning commission'would not be giving"th!'appliiant a grant of special privilege.
henson :s- a/zc/es
FINDINGS
The Planninq and Environmental Commiss.ion shalI 11qle the tol t owi nq f i n grant i nq a variance:
That the granting of the r,'arjance r.rill not constitute a -arant of soecial privi lege inconsistent rvith the lini'ua'u'ions on oiner properties clissified in the same district.
That the granting of the t'ariance will not be de'r-rimental to the public health,safety, or vrelfare, or nraierially injuriout to prop..liui o. improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is irarranted for one cr more of the follorving reasons:
The strict or l'i teral .interpreiaiion and enforcenent of rhe specified reguiation *9y]d. result in praciical .difficuli.y or unnecessary physical i-rarcship inioniistent with the objeciives of t.his title.
There are excections or extraordinar.y cil curistances or ccnci .i t.t ons ecol icable to the site of the variance that do nor apply generaiiy to-other properries in rne q Ama 7/.\no
The strict or I i-ueral incerpreraiicn and enforcerenr of ihe specif.ied reguiation t'rou1d deprive 'uhe. applicant of privi;eces .n.1'.y.J iy-rhe ci.;ners of ot.her properi.ies in the same district.
sr4[_[_8!qqIii!!qal] ry!
The staff recommends approval of both the front setback variance of 20 feet and the side setback viiiance or t+ ieet...The appliiint has decreased the .length of the garage to the, orrginiity gpp";;;; dimensi6h tJ"'il'e-itructure. The parking and snow removar probremi-have-ar;; ;;;; resorved. ir,t, p"oporar no ronger goes bevond the oiiqinar intent oi-thi-irrgrst ts8+ ,ppro"Iii. The appricant is essentially receiving the tur. uroini 6f space ui'wui'orrginuily approved except for the srioht iicrease ir wioirr'of.4'feet.- r[;";;;, given the fact that the garage wai constructeo muitr-iu.g", than-the approved d.imensions, the w'ing wal'ls extend out beyond ttre girage. It is rert iilt-iire appticant wirl treat these wing.walls a-estheticuiiv-iJ'covering them with stone and that to remove them wourd orobably create m"ore"negative".impacts'uy e*posing the tie walt for the entrv'stairwiy. rnJ siiir"iE.ii'itit'ii"ir""""i'ronable to approve tffir:r:il]:ffi:;rl: it wouti no'iong"r'be a srant or speitai-privilese to approve
steptrenl -4- 6/24/ss
DIFFERENCES II{ GARAGE DIMENSIOT.IS TABLE SHOWING
Garage Dimensions
Hallway Dimensions
Square Feet
BLDG/PLAN PERI4IT
DRB PLANS REVIEW PLANS @/15/84) (e/8/84)
25'Lxl3}l 25,Lxl4'4,'l,l with a 3'overhang
4'Wide 4,l,lide
S99 rt garage 300 sf garage
JY sf storage 38 sf storage
338 sf Total 338 sf Total
AS-BUILT
ACCORDING TO
CURRENT IMP SURV
PLANS (CURRENT)
32'L x 13.41'l
5'4" llide
300 sf garage
132 sf storage
432 sf Total
PEC PLANS
(8/8/841
26.L
with a
4',
300
38
x l3'l,l 3' overhang
l.lide
sf garage
sf storage
338 sf Total
Yq =l o F looc f lo4
I NI
I
\l \
-BrLii--Aa.-+ -
N.o'1
:
t o
foccsl R"d
DEc K >7
Ho.rS <
5lab 81r.5.-s
i Go .*-.o c 'Sion Eli€'6
i-':. k -i'i :
Q, 3'o 'o.l--l-c
lb
L 31.?'
A
I
I
I
\l
Pl"n 5ilc
s
E
(-
.o +
J
o
-
\\9 .rv1
I
I
i-t;t-\rx
'
c
+
d
aJ
J ttj
--l-
o
o
o
I
I
,) _ __=
F- s,.o"
17 t nt'
1..
I
I
1 t lr
t \1 \l \l
i Li
ii
-;i
j
=l V'ri II
/1'
J
't\6l
I rl, I
i rrl :c ,o
r/vl
l o f
-r
{l E
o -t o
T lrl
t 1
6r
d\
I
I
I fl
.ol .o'
LJ
I sl al
t
I fl <I
io+
<l
ill
a r,::>:
3o
*e ro
JE
>,o*$
os z\,,ttl..t UP
<-!p;
'tg
'i
I Yl
Gr
I ,l
YI
!a;
I
rJ T
$
-t --s
-l r,slji \lg "g1= I cl :.1
Sn Cl r\-- .-r ln i'^-) a m'-i 'Jr"Q \-OXl,
^J^Cie' ',vq1""--J,3,s3^rlz{_;,YAU
f-a';'1
/=
,\:
'lr-
s
_o cf,
I
]-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d ':l
,fl
;H
:s
o +
at ;
UJ
.l
.:
,JJ
I
I i-jnlN
-r-| --a I' i*-l'-o lr"F liV l/o o Itr-
')
,v ---
| -JGtQ-'r e""oi'
.-\
Planning and Environmental Commission
June 24, 1985
PRESENT
Eric Affeldt
Diana Donovan
Duane Piper
Howard Rapson
Sid Schultz
Jim Viele
ABSENT
Jere l^lalters
meeting was cal'led to order by the chairman, Duane
roval of minutes of qreetings of May 29 and Jun
It was moved and seconded to approve the minutes of of June l0 until corrections cbilla Ue maae.
2.
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Kristan Pritz
Betsy Rosolack
Piper, chainnan, at 3:15 pm.
10.
May 28 and to table those
The
t.
Eric Affeldt volunteered to again be the representative because he had missed several meetings during his last stint on DilB.
Kristan Pr-itz presented the final plans and showed site plans. She indicated on the site plans where the various fhcilities would be locited. Cost estimiiei *"""then discussed. Patten stated that a 5 year rorcaii was-iniicipated. He iaoel-that.the emphasis for Planning commissioir was to be on the'ipiahning" oi-ttre-pi"rs,not the costs. Donovan menti6ned concern iuoui ttre oir<e"path ihiousn ihe-t'i;t[;;Center. -Piper pointed out that there had.already Ueen muln-puulic inpul-inio-ir,"layout of thp parks. Donovan also asled that the'rown Counlii put a time trime-'on the construction of the amphitheaire and alpin" gu.d"r.-
Donovan Park was then considered. One suggestion.was to eliminate one of the skating ponds--either inrthis park orin Ford Pai["and priii-exprJineo that the Councit
Tant9g one skating pond close to the core for touriiti,'anU"on".in West Vail ror lne resldents of that area. Affeldt wondered if the basketball court could *.yt:d for-skating,.and pat oodson,-Reireation-oepu"ir"ni-ai"ector, said that rnts type or pond had been tried and did not work very well.
The question of what department would operate the parks was discussed. Also the fact that the cemetery iite was merely-l "potentiai; fite-iailrei-itran a p"opoi"a site. More discussion concerning the cemetery.
intment of PEC member to DRB for July, Auqust and tember.
3. Presentatjo! of lilql plans for Ford and Donovan parks
PEC 85 -2-
Fa-
Discussion then went back to Ford Park. Affeldt suggested that
and the plaza be a part of the amphitheatre costs. Viele agreed.
that;the board was to consider recommendations for the physical
the pedestrian bridge
Piper stated plant.
Patten pointed out that Vail had acqu'ired open space throughout the valley and it
was important that it develop parks. He stated that the staff felt comfortable
with the knowledge of the general phasing costs without going into the operating costs. He added that later there would be more detail in each phase.
Rapson felt he could recommend going ahead with Donovan Park but not with Ford
Park because of the uncertainty of the amphitheatre and the alpine garden. Helen
Fritch of the alpine garden interest group stated that until they had a commitment of space, they could not finish raising funds for the alpine garden.
Patten stated tht if the board wished, each phase could be reviewed through the conditional use process
Vie'l e moved to recommend approval to Tow Park. There was no second.
Schul moved to recommend a roval of rd Par w'ith reconmendati ons to look at
a r'r me scneoule or!tre a ort a n and to cons I oer
whether t nttot theatre s rIo motion was seco el e.
n favor (Viele, Schultz and Pi The vote was 3 in favor (Viele, Schultz and Piper) and 3 against (Donovan, Affeldt
and Rap5on). Donovan wad against the amphithehtr6, Affeldi agreed' and felt economjc
issues should be taken into consideration, and Rapson agreed with Donovan and also felt that there was uncerta'inty about location of the alpine garden if the amphi-
theatre was not constructed, plus he had concerns about financing.
Piper repeated that fact that the board was only to consider the phys'ica1 part
of the plan, not the financial.
Raoson mov that the Donovan Park lans be submitted to Town Council with the
cons iderati on qL L ree--pnase a reTera eandt at there not s was seco vote v',as avor with
not proper to remove t potenti al
cemetery site from fu
4.uest for riances in order to construct a
pprrcan tep
a cemetery site. Th'i -i--.:.....i--------._vlere vollng agalnst.
estrian bridqe and plaza
de and front setback
Kris
ot
roposal and Ron Wa] ker was present, representing the
\,
Litchliter stated that perhaps
added that VA knew that'therb
comments and it was .imoortant
rrr- 6/24/85
there had been too much focus on the survey. He
was a need to provide nursery service from skier to make this service convenient for the guests.
Schultz disagreed with the surveys and felt that Golden Peak was one of the poor features VA had to offer to guests and needed redevelopment. He teit-tnjf-ii-init
lequest.were.approved now, and if Golden Peak were not redeveloped in two years,it would be difficult to disapprove an extension to the modular'buildins us!.
Discussion followed concerning having the nursery in the main building, and Litchliter claimed that there rya:.ngl enough space. Donova-n felt that in many wiys the survey was not valid' she felt that putting the children so far from the larking was not good' adding a nursery would increaie the parking demand, and day tart ai"O not neeo
lo.!q.incorporated into g gise facility. She protesteC itrat the-existing modutar building was taken off of the tennis courts at'the agreed time in-ine ipiing,-Uut then was left in the Golden Peak parking |ot for sev6ral more weeks, ani aaiea tnat there should not have to be 20 pai^ting ipaces for VA stati.
Rapson said that he would abstain from voting since he was a vA employee, but did offer comments. Rapson stated that every initructor in Golden peak tria-expresieo anger at VA for not going ahead with the-new base facility. He felt thai boiaen Peak was one-thing that detracted from the mountain. Vieie agreed, but wondered if turning vA down wou'l d have any overall effect on VA's piani. He felt that if the modular buiiding were donb correctly, it could wori<, and if approved irroufa be monitored carefully. Affeldt asked if vA had looked it wnat thb'other floor levels of the Golden Peak base facility could proviae in ilre way of space-for --
nursery faci'l ities, and agreed that having the'children walk so-far iir ski boots was not a good solution. He felt that to grant the approval would leave the Town
Ii9._9pg!,t9^9ty9 loo"oval for five more.yEars. .. Piibr felt that a modular building per se dlcl not have to-have a negative stigma. He asked what response should be given to someone like Jack Rush iho may haie trao J iurvev miae tnbt showed aneea for more convention space and asked foi i moauiir-uriiaii,g io" the convention s-pace.
More was said about the allocation of parking spaces. Macy said that the 20 vA spaces were negotiable.
V'iele moved and Pi seconded to a rove the ues t an Wnlcn WOU l(l inc a modu lar
for a two-vear i nterim
on or a one-year a rova
favor ai nst abstai ni n
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 pm.
-PEc
-3- 6/24/85
applicant. There was discussion of the trash room, and also discussion of how to avoid this type of problem in the future. Patten pointed out that there is an appeals board that meets to handle complaints concerning contractors.
Vielg moveC and Donqyan gecondgC.tg approve thq setbacl< variances because the qranting qf the varjance would not constitute a qrant of.ipe@ y and because the str.i ct or literal inter-retation and enforcement of the regulation would result in unnecessa
aqa r nst.
the DRB liason to roof to the wing
5. R=equelt to.amen9_etn gpproyed development plan to allow for a two-.year interim plan for the Golden Peak Ski Base area. lFp
Peter Patten presented the proposed amended plan. He stated that th'is zone district
wa1 d]rectly related to the redeve'lopment plan that had been approved by the Town,and VA was now lequestjng an interim p'lan that would have a maxjmum appioval period
9f lwo years. Patten listed 5 aspects of the proposal which included'l new mbdular building for nursery care, a revised parking lot configuration which would accommodate
93 paid public parking spaces,20 vA staff spaces and ig parent drop-off spaces,a new set of stairs near the existing drop-off spaces, a revised lahdscapihg p1 an which included berming on the east end of the parking lot and 5 additionil ipi^uce trees north of the modular units, and an interior remodel of the existing buildings to improve employee 'locker rooms and add space to the rental shop. Patten stated that the cuiverting of the stream and fj'l 'l ing the Race City parking lot has been
done.
Joe Macy of vA sajd the purpose of the plan was to come up with an interim pl an until the permanent facility could be constructed. He stlted that VA had dbne
market research to find out ryhat people felt was important to improving their ski
experience in Vail. He stated that only 12% felt improving Golden Peak was a higtf priority (shorter lift lines, adding to ski temain, additiona'l restaurant
seat-ing were h'igh priority). Therefore Golden Peak redevelopment was being deferred in favor of the other priorities. A nursery was found to be important, and the
Town does not have one. vA is puttj ng this one'in at an expensb loss of 935,000.Macy stated that VA would agree'to thE conditions listed in'the memo. Lairy-Litch-liter, vice president of Vail Associates in charge of mountain operations and,lack
Hunn, project supervisor were also at the meeting. Craig Snowdon, architect for
Golden Peak, showed overlay photos with the additional modular in place.
Jack Rush, .general manager of Manor Vail, spoke against the project maintaining that Macy did come to Manor Vaj'l and expressed VA's intention of building the-
second modular building. He stated that 5 months ago vA came and asked for
changes to their redevelopment plan and were now baik to ask for more. He pointed
out. that the neighborhood group had not asked for one change. He added that with
q.9l?ngg.of ownership of vA there may be a change of leadeiship and it would be djfficult to know whether or not VA would be planning on going'ahead with the original p'lan. Originaily the idea was to put everything into one-building.
vote was 5 in favor w
P'iper asked
ship of the
grve
wal I s.
spec attention to the materials and relation-
oo Appl i cati on
PEC MEETING
,"rpO
DATE
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
I' This procedure is,required f9I qn.I project requesting a variance. The application will not be accepted unti'r a'H inioirnaiion is'submitieJ.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRESS El \ --c ** s-
HoNE &\?_rloo
B. NAME OF APPLICANT.S REPRESENTATIVE A€o.Tq-
ADORESS ftO ^l ._,,t^ r_r.lt-
_-___PHoNE916 - rol{+
NAM
S
E 0F 0WNER(S)(type or orint) AaolrF c.
\ rc-
ADDRESS
D.
PHONE
LocATioN 0F PRoPoSAL
ADDRESS 159
L EGAL D Es C R I PT I 0N L0T_jZ_B LOC K___g_F I L I NC_& re__
E' FEE $r00 PAID s'y'//r) cx *-/73 t-FRoMM
THE FEE MUsr 8E PAID By'F0Rf THE coMMUNITy DEVELopMmT ogpnnnmnr wfillccFr YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. A list of the names of owners of all properry
INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STRFFTS-
THE APPLICANT l,JILL BE REsPONIIsiE-F0n-idRRici
adjacent to the subject property
and their mailing addresses.
MAILING ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE l^lIT! A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED T0}DETERMINE-I-F-AryY ADDITI0NAL tnronNnilorv-ii rlilblo'. N0 AppLrcATr0N t^rrLL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT Is c0MPLrrE-(r'lt]sr irv-cfurji iiii"iirr'ls REquTRED By rHE zoNrNG ADMINISTRAT9U.- Ir IS THE APPLicANT'a nEiFor'rsisriiiv ro MAKE AN ApporNTMENr l{ITH THE STAFF T0 FIND oUT ABOUT ADDITrorvnr-3ueuiiinl ntQutnEMENT5.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR Y0uR PR0JEcr-ev-oecRmlNG-THE NUMBER 0F coNDrrtons'or nppnovAL THAT THE pLANNTNG AND ENVIR0NMENTAL COMMIssI0N r'lev_SrieqinTE: -4i-ioNDrTroNS
0F AppRovAL Musr BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT Ts_issnED..--' i
ITI. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE RTQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST_AiSO'RiONTSS:
l. The relationship of the requested variance to other uses and structures jn the'vicinity.
2. The- degree to which rerief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a^specified reguration is il;r;;;i'io i.r,i"u" compatibiritv and uniformity of treatment afrong sites in itre-vi'cinitv-b" t" itilin';h;'"objectives of this tit're without grant or spliiai-p"iuir"g..
existing or potential
oo Otl,-
3. The effect of the variance on right alg_qil, distribution of poprrration,transportation, traffic facilities, utilities, ana'puUfic iuf6i!.'-- - '
B. A topographic and/or improvement survey at_a sca.le of at_.least 1,,_ 20, stamped by a colorado licensed iurveyor including^-to.iiioir"or'itt existing improve-ments' including_grades and elevations. '0thei-"i"il"iit'*hich
must be shown are parking and 'loading areas, ingress and egress, iinir.ap"o areas and utility and drainage features.
c. l:i!g plan at a scale of at reast r" = 20' showing exist.ing and proposed bu'i I di ngs.
D. All pre'timinary building elevations the dimensigns, g€n€Fal -appearance,
extsttng and proposed on the site.
E. A prelim'inary title report to verify
and_floor plans suff.icient to indicate scale and use of ail buildings inA-ipices
ownership and easements
IV.
F' If the proposal is located in a multi-family development which has a homeowners,association, then written.approval from the-.rsoiiilion in support of the projebt must be received by'a du'ry urino"ii"J-;;;;;'i;; said association.
G' Any add'itional material--nggeqsgry for the review of the apprication as determined by the zoning adminisiraior..
* For interior modificatioTs: gn improvement survey and site plan may be waived by the zoning administratoi^.
Time Requirments
The Planning and Environmental Comnission meets 0t each month. A complete application form and (as described above) must be'iuUmiiteA a minimum PEC.pub'lic hearing. No incomplete applications administrator)_will be accepted by thl planning nated submittal date.
on_the 2nd and 4th Mondays all accompanying material
.of 4 weeks prior to the date of the (as_determined by the zoning staff before or after the disig-
oo to
May 21 , t9B5
lown of Vail Planning Staff
Planning and Environment Commissions
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorad.o 87657
To the Town of Vail Planning Staff and Planning and Environment Cornmissions;
After meeting with the town counqil-and the planning staff, the applicant
is proposing the following modifications to this garage in the hopes of
gaining your approval .
The front wall and roof of the garage will be moved in a distance of six
feet fron where it currently exists. A new wa}l will be added at this
point to accept the garage door. The east wa11 of the structure will be
cut at an angle to match the existing retaining walI on the adjacent pro -
-perty. The west waIl will be brought out approximately sixteen inches to
acconnodate access to the trash storage space. The portion of roof over
this space witl remain. The rear storage closet will be cut down approximat-
-e1y two feet to provide the required nineteen foot parking area. The new
exterior surfaces created by these modifications will be sided with 1Xl2
board and bat rough sawn cedar, which matches the existing siding of the
house.
Accordingly we are requesting sufficient variances to permit these mod-
- ifications .
lhank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Respectfully,
bc>
oa ao
,oo
$lffiFe,m asBffiGno
oo
;
t.i
D t a
7 t o
,L
vf
d ,
b
J
b
\t
7
P
r4 u
t
19
.9 {,
I
rJ4
t,
4 c7 -O .{-ot
J
t
SL-pad to,
ffrit<-l^r ln1do TAAsH
3rPrl4r(tL
1,, vr.ofiE. .\:1.
giA!gs's4r
'L.4 , i,
Y
Fcootl oo
oo
:\1ts-
----J-
I .J
ao
F ua. '.J
PE iPEN ',0.2'aT
:
i
HOUSE _....
Slob:€125.5
--- ff'. .ir-
I
NO PT J-rtr o r v
t2 l
A
ul (o
a
TO:
FROI{:
DATE:
SUBtEef3
Tovn Council
CoDDunity Developnent Departnent
Itay 71 1985
Appeal of the planning and Environoental Coumisgionrs decision to deny a requeat for a eide setback variance of 14 feet and a front setback variance of 2O feet in order to construct a garalJe on Lot 121 Block lt Tail Village 6th Filing- Applicant: A. Emet Stephensonr Jr.
t. August 13, 1984
The applicant requested a 12 foot front setback variance and an l1 foot s j.de setba ck variance. Ihe pEC granted these variances because there uere extraordinary circum-stances on the property. Hatf of the existing house is located in the front setback which means that any addition would require variances. The parking probleml on Forest Road were also improved by the additional parking area that rras added in the remodel proposal.The PEC voted unanimously (5-O) to approve these two requests.
2. February 25, 1985
The applicant requested a 20 foot front setback variance and 14 foot side setba ck variance in order to complete the construction of the nev garage. The garage was under construction when i t wa s determi ned tha t i t encroached beyond the approved variances. The encroachment was verified by an improvement location certificate.The PEC and staff cited concerns about the parking problem crea ted by the location of the garage, about snow removal problemsr and the fact that a 6 foot construction error was made. The pEC voted unanimously to.deny this requestr ds it would be a grant of speciai privi lege.
DESCRIPTTON OF REQUEST
Mr. stephenson is requesting a 2o foot front setback variance and a 14 foot side setback variance in order to construct a 9arage on an existing single family dwelling. The complete proposal included the construction of an additionr deck; and single car garage to the east of the existing unit. This property is located at 756 Forest Road. varianc"l for this re-mod;rin;project have been reviewed three times by the planning and Environi nental commission. Below is a summa ry of the three revievs:
The applicant made essentially the same reguest for a 20 f oot f ront setba ck variaice -r,J-u .r-4 f oot side setback variance- The difference ue-tween this proposar and the proposal of Februa ry 25,u"-ttr.t the garage door r"rourd be recessed in oroe'r t" u-ilJ" io. "n additional parki.ng space in front -of the new garage. The pEC aga in .voted .unanimousry. t" a."f iii" ."qu""t. It was fe' t. tha t the applicanc had ao"" r,i"-uest to address the parking and snow removal probJ.ems crea ted by the encroachments. Howeverr the peC "iui"O that the 2O foot and 14 foot varian,i n re n r o r trre a pprove;';_ :;: :.:? o?;":" :t?""r.."ii: i if the original-proposal had required variances of this magni tude, the pe. _woula noi fra.r" .pproved the requests- Both the pEC and staff be'i.u. -ttut'u ."";;";l;solution had been work"g^g!t tttrougt tre rirst variance approval on August 13, 1992.
Mr' stephenson is requesting the 20 foot front setback variance rrhi ch is 8 feet srea ter than the originar 12 foot varlance and a lso a l4 foot "ide seto""r.-rJri.nce which i"-: feet grea ter than the originar rl foot variani- The garage rs o feet ronger than the approved building p"i*it pransl rie t.ure ber.ow shows the difference berlreen rhe-biirdi;;-;;;'-r j'ir#, and as_buir r plans according to a current improvement. survey.
March 25, 1985
Garage Dimensions
Ha tlway Dimensions
Square Feet
BLDG/PLAN PERMIT
REV I EI,I PLANS (olataA\\rt vt n.-r I
tat I wlAI nutl .-\J L/\ t.t .+ n
4' l,'lide
AS-8UILT
ACCORDING TO
CURRENT iMP SURV
PLANS (CURRENT)
32'L x .l3.4l'.J
5' 4" l,l ide
300 sf qaraqe
132 sf itorige
432 sf Total
JUU ST
Jd ST
garage
storage
JJ6 SI IOtA I
l;;.llirlj::::"::: made the forrowins statement concernins rhe
rAs a n a I terna t i ve. -proposa l1 we wi ll reloca te the garage door in a-_ wa l-l constructed 6 fee t inside the ;;:::'.1t 'r1"":';;:l ^t-t*: rn-;
-;; to be puir.o p".tiauy
pa rk i n e s pa c e s
I i" :fl i - : i'o ;, r'J."" ;""X' i : : :" ;.T'r"r. ri:previously approved varia".i.-.f August 13, 19g4.
I Accoroingly I w€ dre requesting sufficient variances
I for the garage to remain with this modification.
/ Both the applicant and contractor acknowledge a gross I error by not adhering to the approved drawings.
Howeverr we feel that this concerns of pa rking conges snow removaf stated in the r{ithout having to destroy is genera l1y considered an previous condi tions.
a I te rna t i ve a ddresses the tionr traffic fl.owr and origina I variance reguest the existing garage which aesthetic improvement of
Furthermorer we would l ike of the front portion of the or enhance existing condi of a concrete retaininq wall
PBC DECISION
it to be noted that removaf structure would not benefi t tions due to the location
on adjacent property. "
of the variances would go beyond the of the August 1984 approval.s.
The staff made a presentation that recommended denial for this proposal at the March 25 pEc meeting. The contractor for the project stated that he felt that the main objections due to the location of the garage had been addressed by the new proposal.He added that everyone wouLd benefit by the completion utd il""rrrp o! t_he project. The general opinion of the pEC wis that a substanl tial effort had been rnade io correct the situationr tow"v"i,if this proposa I ha d been presented origi na I ly r the pEC r.roul d never have approved it. when the original variances were requestedl the variances were approved because or the speciar circuns-tances on the site. The nev variances go beyond the orignal intent
9{ the^approvals.given by the pranning commission on August 13r 1984- A motion.hras made by Howard Rapson and seconoet uv sid schultz to deny the requested variances per the staff memo-.The merno cited the following reasons why the request should be denied:
o The granting original intent
o fo grant the privilege.
o If the present the staff would
request.
va ri a nces vou.ld be
application had been not have been abl
a grant of specia I
reviewed origina lly,e to suppor t the
The PEC voted unanimously 6-0 in favor of denial.
Enclosed is a copy of the improvement survey which shows the location of the garage under construction. c-opies of the March 25, 1985 and August 13, 1984 staff memos as iell as minutes from the March 25, 1985 PEC meeting are also included. If possibler it wou_ld be helpf ul to visi t this si te whi ch is .Ioca ted a t 756 rorest Road.
t
LOCATION CERTIFICATE
I, Vail Vitlage 6th
Forest Road
PEiFEIiIDtCUL AR TIE
o.2'AT 3.3'FROiA NE CORNER C'
PE q P€N DICUL;
l3 AT 52.1 t;
, ...
,IMPROVEMENT
Lot 12, Blk
756
FOREST ROAD
5
.1
HCUSE
Slob 8t25.5
30'
I t i ne 'of recess rage door
G:EAG€
S,er 51,3 €Peot :4:-
r
=o
17O':q 7
Sca'le:
t
I
IIORTH
c A
c'r 'a
ltt = l0'
LOT
75 soulh fronlage road
Ysil, colorado 81557
(303) 476-7000 ottlce of communlly developmenl
April 5, .l985
A. Emmet Stephenson
General Conmunicatjons, Inc.
899 Logan Street - Suite 600
Denver, Colorado, 80203
RE : Stephenson Va ri ance Appeal
Dear Emmet,
Your Planning and Environmental Comnission appeal is scheduled for the
Town Council neeting on April 16th, Tuesday at 7:30P14 at the Town of
Vail CounciI Chambers. If you wish to present any material at the
meeting, it must be the same presentation as made before the Planning
and Environmental Commission on l.'larch 25th, .l985. Please call me if
you have further questions.
Si ncerely,
\{i'h*q-'h'
Kristan Pritz
Town Pl anner
KPl rme
April 3, 1985
Vail Town Council
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO. 81657
Dear Sirs:
I wish to appeal the denial of a variance request which rras denied at a Planning Commission meeting on llarch 25, 1985 regarding my property at 756 Forest Road.
Very truly yours,
Eurnet Stephenson, Jr.
General Cormnunications, Inc.
[5/ n@
%-Zr.a.4-/a/?r/
?7 1"'^a
Mlat{,
|\oho.,t
Y$
3
Planning and Environmental Commigsion
Conmuni ty Developnent Departnent
llarch 25, 1985
A request for a side setback variance of 14 feet and a front setback of 2O feet in order to construct a garage on Lot 12t Block fr Vail village 6th Filing.Applicant: A. Emmet Stephensonr Jr.
DESCRIPTION OF YARIANCE REQUESTED
This variance request was previously reviewed by the PEC on
February 25r 1985. At that time the planning Commission denied
-itle
setback variance of 14 feet and the f ront setback
variance of 2o feet. The Plannirf6-m*iseion andG-t
@iances would be i grant of special privilege.
To further encroach on the setbacks would go beyond the original
intent of the approvals given by the Planning Commission. Particular
concerns raised by the Planning Commission and staff included the parking problem crea ted by the f oca tion of the gardger snor"t
I | ^tr^( Ir removaLr and the fact that a 6 foot error was rade in the construc-
? t'^1"?ndapion of the garage. The error conf f icts wi th the approved DRB tNLUr'r' plansr PEC plans and the approved building plans.
The following table shows the differences in garage dimensions
among the PEC plans, building permi t plans and as-built plans
according to the most recent improvement survey. ( This table
was included in the previ ous memo. )
RDUiO
Hal lway Dimens jons 4' W'ide 4'Wide
Square Feet 3q0 sf garage 300 sf garage
,- .-:. dr1.. ,
38 sf storage 38 sf storage
ura5r338 sf Total 33Q sf Total l>ffi 20:f"^I' ! lnt,'+'l^ ^if / I' fid; tl iltt ? #'r >lhot" ttty
l'lr. stephenson is requesting t@ variance which is 8 f eet grea ter than the original ll.J*'cr-L-lrF ria nc-€ 611d also a 14 feet cide c€tba i-q 3 feet oreater than the original 1l foot variance. This request ie basically the game as the previous variance request except that Mr. Stephenson is proposing to recess the garage door by 6 feet. By recessing
Sl,rrdE
AS-BUILT
ACCORDING TO
CURRENT IMP SURV
PLANS (CURRENT)
6'u*<.' l.V '
32'L x l3.4tl
(@
300 sf garage
.l!2 sf storage
432 sf Total
TO3
FROU:
DATEs
SUE ECT
PEC PLANS
BLDG/PLAN PERMIT
REVIEl,l PLANS
Garage Dimensions . 26'L x 13'W 26'L x l3W 26'Lxl4'4"ll|
with a 3' overhang with a 3'overhang
4' l,Iide
300
38
sf garage
sf storage
338 sf Total
l&tis,a
tnllaaq,
"As an aLternative proposalr we will relocate the garage door in a wall constructed 6 feet inside the existing struitur6,allowing a car to be parked partiarry inside. This wirl provide the required number of parking places in the config-uration intended by the previously approved variance of August B, 1984.
Accordingly, vre are requesting sufficient variance for the existing garage to remain with this modification.Both the applicant and contractor again acknowLedge a gross error by not adhering to the approved drawings.
I Howeverr we feel that this aLternati.ve addresses the concerns
I of parking congestion, traffic fIowl and snow removal stated
| 1." the o:iginal variance request without having to destroy
I the existing garage which is generally considered in aestheti-c I improvement of previous conditions.
lFurthermorer we wourd like it to be noted that removal
lof the front portion of the structure would not benefit
lor enhance existing conditions due to the rocation of a Lconcrete retaining wall on the adjacent property. r,
(please see the enclosed drawing and minutes and. memo from our February 25, 7985 PEC meeting tor further background infornration.j
CRITBRIA AND .PINDTNGS
Congideration of Factora
The relationshi of the requested va rlances to other etistin or potential uaea and atructures in the vicini
staff does believe that by recessing the garage door the parking eituation is improved. public worlis has alsb stated that th;recessed garage door solves the concerns about parking on the public right of way and snow removal problems. However, the garage doee extend to the edge of the front property rine which was never the intent of the originally approved encroachment.The previoua variances allowed for an g foot buffer between
witeria and Findig-gs, segtion rq.q2.nt recomendg
EEe--r-6f t oyi ns f a c tors :
the end of the garage and the property line. This buffer is no longer maintained. The purpose of a setback is to crea te a buffer betLreen devefopment and adjacent properties. some negative impact on potential uses and structires results from the unnecessary encroachment of the garage into the front 2o foot setback and 15 foot side setback.
The ree to which relief from the strict or literal inte tation ano e orcement of a c on ts necesaary to acnleve bilitv and un form of trea tment aDonq si teg n the or to a tta in ectives of this title without ra nt of special privilege-
Ihe effect of the sted variance on li and airr distribution of uIa tion tra ns tion and traffic facilitiesr Dublic fac ties a ut and lic safetv.
When this proposa I was originally approvedr the variances r.rere granted because it was felt that -therL were speciaL circumstances due to the location of the house on this site and topography that made it reasonabLe to allow the variances to construct the garage. The applicant was given an ll f,Cq! side setback variance and a 12 foot frgnt setback vaflE--nce. The current situation shows tha t the gfues 20 f eet into the front setback and 14 reet into the side setback. The current variance request extends 8 feet beyond the originarly approved 12 foot front setback variance. ThL reguired 15 foot side setback variance is encroached upon up to 14 ieet. This encroachment i: 3 feet beyond the originarty approved side setback variance of 11 feet. staff believes that it would be a grant of special privilege to increase the setback encroachments beylnd the originally approved variance request in August of 1994. wL would nol havi supported the variance request if the present variance had been originally proposed.
Public Works. has determined that addresses the concerns about pa the most partr the trade-offs tha
the recessed garage door design rking and snow remova l. For t were agreed upon in the previous
the pub_lic riqht-of-wav, I of-eray is@d.
such other factors ?nd cTiteria as the conmission deema appricabte @rrpnce.
FINDINGS
approvafs are maintained.
The Pla and EnYironnental Co4misaion shall nake the follosin ore grantinq a var ance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the timitations on o-ther properties classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public healthr safetyr or welfarer or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance ia warranted for one or more of the following
rea sona :
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would resuft in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
there a re excepti ons or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance tha t do not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation wouLd deprive the applicant of privi leges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distric t.
STAFF RBCOT'ITBNDATION
The staff rbcommends denial of both the front setback vari.ance of 20 feet and the side setback variance of 14 feet. It is felt that the applicant has done his best to address the parking problems and snow remova I considerations. However, the gianting of the variances wouLd go beyond the original intent of the August 1984 approvals. To grant the variances would be a grant of special privilege. Moreoverr if the present application had been reviened originallyr the staff wouLd not have been able to support the request.
'.rt
't.-
', .'n
'tL
t?
-\ G: NOPTHFRLY
,PERPENDICUL 6ft TIE
' o.2'aT 3.3'FROt'il NE CoRNEF C1
I
FOREST ROAD
.1
CECK
HCUSE
Slob ElZ5.5
(D -t cl :t-
Scal e :
0
I
NORTH
---
;'EaFEN DICUL j -
t3 LI 5? | tl.'..
lt' = l0t
LOT
Planning and Envjronmental Commissjon
March 25, l9g5
PRESENT
Eric Affeldt
Di ana Donovan
Duane Piper
Sid Schul tz
,lim Viele
,Jere l,lal ters
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
i(ri sran Pli tz
Rick Pyiman
The meeting was cailed to order at 3:00 pm by the chairman, Duane piper.
.,- Moved by-Rapson, seconded by Donovan to was 7-0 in favor.
li"f 'nfl:::.:0,":l:r'r:: ll, :::rii :^::r i"g:;iri?r
"iie';i
. g"o?"in!' li;if iil'ii;:Koao. -t;;
vote was 6 in favor with VleiE aUstaJninq.
2.
lrl.r:*t=*rr*ed the staff memo and added an explanation of the orisin of the Arterial Bus.i ness Distr.ict, current uses and the recommendation of denial of the request as submitted. oriI nvan, representing eoo voriieir "*priinui''.,.request and the inte111gn of redevetopment bt tne voiiier iioperty. Bob Votiter gave a snort presentation on redeveropmeni plans foi trii'plopertv.
(yan and Voliter then offered an amended proposal to assuage certajn concerns of the staff. The pEC comments fofioweJ.
Viele was abstaining-due to partiar ownership of property r^rithin the Arieriar Business Distrjct. _!oryun rppJi"i i'r'.'rrrti-family condos and lodge uses jn the district, schultz-echoed bbnovinif-concerns and added the concern of add.i tional pedestrian and vehicular traffic in tn.'area, Affeidt asked how many units would be allowed on these properties ana teti the Aso distriii-was not compatible with multi-family uses. |.Jali:ers ug".lJ *iit tt'" staff recommendat.ion and felt that traffic was an important.oniiouiiti;;; pip". i.it inil'ioiging courd possibly be a viab]e use, but.had conier;;-;i;i;'rong term residentiai. Rapson was grad to see the interest in redevetoping'iiie property and would rike to try to work
Ylrl"ll"l1:'l:o.l::n::t:- lllt:l dlJ4-. p"Lr"niuiion o, u,. ABD circuration pran
inrr"tat reft. )
3.uest for a side setback varlt-nceif t4 feet and a front setback variance ee no er to construct a qaraqe on LO Block I,ail Vi aqe 6t Fflins.i cant:. lmrnet Stephenso-l Jr.
Kristan Pritz made the staff presentation.'Arnos Joanis, the contractor, was representing the owner. Joanis stated thai he felt the rnain objectio,ri'[uo been ansvrered
of
Approval of m i nutes of March I'l
approve the mi nute s .The vote
by the new proposa.l and errors. He added that rne project.
that the new proposal
everyone would benefit
ou-
was an attempt to by the completion
correct previous
and cleanup of
3/?s/8s
Viele fett that a substantiat effort n.l^*:1.-1n39..!o.correct.the situation, bur ne sti' wourd not have supported tr,e'apprication ri-ii-""". the.original proposar and--did not want to support'ii-ii ii,ir'iir". lg'son r"rt-ir,rt the aesthetics.wourd not be improved bi-il,r ;;;r;i'Jr'tn" ,urif -[rt'i"it"i,..courd
not support l!!":S:"t'' rhe rest of ;;r pi;'#mters reri iiri"ir,.v'.'ol,o not support the
Rapson moyed and
was 6-0 tn EvoFot ?Enffi
Schultz seconded to den the r ues ted la ri ances er the staff memo.he votE
Eric Affeldt was unanimously appointed DRB member for April,May and June.
';, {
,.
ao '--t
.Febnrary ?7,1985
l
To the'Ioun of Vail Plareing St?ff and Plr r rir':{ :,:'(.1 Fnvirc- r(nt
After discussions witb the Plannii:g Staff a:d i'lt,li r: Worl:sr i','c i.rr !r'.,;.(si:riq
a ne,rly desigaed plien tbat we hope lrirl :,tdres.;s tbe cc,'rcc'rns r,,f all i. .rr:':s.
.As an alternative propcsal we will relor:ate tL,e g.i-':ge,l'r"r in a ruall constru,. :'l
. six,fedt inside the existing structure, allowiag a c arr to be parkeC paltially
inside. This ryill provide the required number of parking places in tbe
configr:ratlon i::tended by the previously approved variance of August 8'
19.44.
A c,- .,r''-linglr', il e are r';cluesting suf ficient varjance fc,r tl're ,.:':sti:r'l gar.?ge
to rernajn ,vith this arodificaiion. Both the applicant i -,d ,:::,.,tractor ag..,n
acLnowk:dge a Erots r-rror by not adhering to the appr-o1'q;11 fl1-'i''r;"9s.
o
Ifowci'er, \. e f. 'l i! .it this alternative :'(ijd: ;,ssas tlc ,- u-rr, ':'is .:,f , i'!'.i.';rl
Longestiorr, t,:'{fir: flow, arrd snow reD)or-rl stati.ri in the ',rigir..i:'1 , i+ . '
1e,gue9t, without )ra.ving to destroy the exis'iing g:rrage rvbich is q, ,,rr a)ly
cogsidered an aesthetic improvement of previcrrs conditi.rns,
Frrrthcrrnore, rve. worrld like it to be n,.rtcrl t\ ,t removal of the front | ,;''; .,:i
of tbe strircture would not benefit or ent,e rce existing c, nditions dr-re
to tbe location of a conirete retaining w ell on tlre :rdja,:r'iit plcperty.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration in this matter.
Respectively,
Emmet Stephenson
ES/mjm
' i1iL I
ii ,-
F*;o J
i'-;-,iFr
,3s
z
HE E.uJ|o a-'
J
II o I J,v ' lrj z ,tl o ()
9tu f-z
'' :E a9
J;
'n 9'o ' Ori ,z
. lr, F o-<
' tr'lr ":o-o
.>FJ?r,o)
o
i
:(
ql o
-l t- 'i
f
A/PLJCATION FTJR A ',',riR i ANCE
'' l a t ance.
REPRESTNTATIVE A-gc, * o--
l"F' t
'';- i,
Phti'lE
LEGAL DESCRIPT]ON LOT I? BLOCK i FILING / ;a+
F
f.f E.E $r 00 PAID cK#FROM
Jl:"F::^Il:T.BEPAIDBEF0RETHtC0l"ll4UN]TYDEVEL0PMENTDEPARTMENTUILLAc;;r YOUR PROPOSAL.
F. A list of the names of owners of all prioperty
INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS SiNhTiS,
THE APPLICANT I.IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECi
.
adjacent to the subject.property',
and their mailing addresses;
MAiLING ADDRESSES.
II.A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE l,lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED - ; '
T0 )DETERMINEIFANY'ADDITIoNAL INFoRMATT0N is NEEDED. N0 AppLrcAiiolr-wrrl-sE-'" ,,,
ACCEPTED UNLESS rr rs c0MILFIF (r4usT iNqllii 4ii iiir4l-nEbirinro sy rHE zoNir,i6 .a i, i l?yjNlllqlgB). Ir Is rHE APpLicANT's RESpoNSrBrLrry T0 ;'srii-nn-nppijinilrini" ;l^lITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL
'UBMiiiNi
AiQiiiR'Erqii.irS. .,, .
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION l,lILl- STREAI'|LiNt THE lppn0i,lL PROCESS ioR Y0uR PR0JEcr 8Y DECiEASITG-IHr NUI4BER 0F coNDITioNS 0F ApI,ROVAL 'rHAT THE ptAf,tf,tli.s
AND tNvlr(Jt{I4ENTAL C0iil{ISSION l{AY STiPUI-ATE. Al-l-_ CoNDTTIT:Hi'or AppRoVAL MUsT Br COI4PL IED WITH BEFCRE A SUILDIIJG PTRMIT IS_ iSSI-rb-,
--''-' ' ':''"
III. FoUR (4) CoPItS 0F THE FCLLOL,iltG i4ijs-f BF itiBi,itlT ii-D:
I
/<P
Planning and Environmental Cormission
February 25, 1985
Site Visits
Public Hearing
Approval of minutes of February ll.
Request for a side setback of 14 feet and a front setback of
20 feet in order to construct a ganage on Lot 12, Block'1 ,Vail Village 6th Filing.
App'l icant: A. Enmet Stephenson, Jr.
Stephens Subdivision Plat Update
Reminder of joint meeting with Town Counci'l on March 12,tentative time is 2:00 pm.
2:30
3:00
t,,
I
P
t.
2.
3.
4.
t,
L.
?.
erkg/fuOry
c^n5{ WcNilkq
{\utapr-a
a:L
OO
and En Pl ann i ng TO:
olu'{*\2o:{C
ll )iL tid{vironmental Commission
FR0M: Conrnunity Development Department
DATE: February 25, '1985
SUBJECT: A request for a side setback variance of
variance of 20 feet in order to construct
Vail Village 6th Filing. Applicant: A.
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
Mr. Ste nson is uesti I anc 8 feet the
for a garage addition that is in the process of Uetng
constru . During construction the structure was increased
It{'
14 feet and a front setback
a garage on Lot 12, Block l
Emmet Stephenson, Jr.
in lenoth bv 6',and in width bv lf4" which has increased the setback encroachmenls
erylgveg by Lhq_$C. rorJhJi reason, t'ti. Stephen t varTan-es. This property previously received two variances from the PEC on August
J.3J99.{r The original variances included a front setback variance of 12 fee-
and a s'ide setback variance of'l I feet in order to construct a garage and an addition to the existing residence.
The_following table shows the differences in garage dimensions among the PEC building plan permit review plans and as-bui1t plans according to the most recent
improvement survey:
AS-BUILT
BLDG/PLAN PERMIT ACCORDING TO
C PLANS PEC PLANS DRF PLANS REVIEW PLANS CURRENT IMP SURV /8/84) (8/8/84) (8/15/84) (9/.8/84) PLANS (CURRENT)
l."lttur.
Garage Dimensions 26'L x l3'W 25'L x l3l'l 26'Lx'14'4"W 32'L x 1.3.4W
:, with a 3' ovgrhang with a 3'overhang io dRNpAq , t.l 6i(+On(a
Hallway Dimensions 4i t,tide ) 4,tltide 4, wide. U UElq', fiiae
Square Feet 300 sf
38 sf
338 sf Total
garage 300 sf
38 sf
garage
storage
Total
garage
storage
iloo .r
132 sf
garage
storage storage
300 sf
38 sf
338 sf.Total
,Y^:!IF!ffi
338 sf 432 sf Total
(Please see enclosed memo dated August 8, 1984 and
The table above indicates t :t the as-built plans do not reflect what was approved at the building plan review stage. The length of the garage as well as the width
does not comply nit6 rhat was approved at the building plan permit stage. The
variances for the front and side setbacks could have been respected 'if the width of the hallway djmension between the garage and the addition to the existing unit
would have been maintained. The width of the hallway according to the improvement
survey is 5'4". The approved width for this hallway is 4 feet. The addition
\ r of l'4" has created the side setback problem. I$!9u1d also be noted that the
{'differencesin''sizesforthegaragesoonotcreatffio =76+
' n - I I\l
0-t$tgl'rv\\'\
I
ste$Tn -2- 2/2s/85
The applicant has made the following statement to explain how the setback
encroachment occurred:
r by not ad tric
el evati ons cn were s
and Planning Departments, and that
been consulted prior to proceeding
acknowl have made
e constru t and approved by Bui 1di ng
these departments
with construction.
should have
E9were!,ld like it to
n accordance wit
arl ance \,\
The ap licant also fee the structure as
That
'fE"does not impact negatively on traffic flow, s TE'does not impact negatively on traffic flow, snoFffioval , .,, arl "J" :utility maintenance or, because of the underground construction dKnlu-'\Fi;utrrlty malntenance or, because of the underground construction /F11"-'\i-tj -
ofi the building, on vjsual concerns of adjacent properties. That tt${Rtqae{--it does provide more than required off-street park'ing and is 'in P{${.lt^-\i.' -
(,4
:la
exi sts
,\
i!IL
general an improvement of existing conditions.
Consideration of Factors
The re]ationshi the sted variances r existi
sErucEures rn \0r/
ulfqi\q\ \
t@rSa! \A\t
0\ ts --
$J#\U\tlr 5a! \A\\.ffiid /Ql!^$n-;"e' qrdf \u_
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS .\r-..-.-./
*T"fr\--hil^iffi,-l
Upon review of Criteria and F'indings, Sect'ion .|8.62.060 of the Municipa, C?oe. tff{)\U^t-
"riancel
Upon review of Criteria and F'i ndings, Sect'ion .|8.62.060 of the Municipa, C?oe. tfJ{)
"riancel based upon the following factors:
tential uses and
.W
t4
)
ant 't ng
r)
One of the
some of the
primary reasons r9r
rk'i ng probl ems
these
a
we as traffi 6'h--E e street. f@a snow removal problem
co!qiation. two unit's parking requirement for the addition. One space was oFdeF to meet this
ed
Now that the garage is almost to
,rparki '17ft will occur
now exlsts5
'l
red dimension
the edge of the frcnt
-of-
araqe.
property 'line of s lot,ntoft e.
in len
T
hat the parkin
o e appf icantt The
that
I ot.
of-way parking. No more
relationship of thi s va-ri
stfJn -3- 2/25/85
would be
or'r a r na varl ance
nt has al so stated the
rKtn that special concessions were previously made to a'l low
concessions should be allowed.ttaff hel ieveq that the
or struct
Ml
The de to which relief from the strict or I iteral retati on i nte
requl ati on s necessa to ac I EVE t ty an uniformity o
s'ites in vicinit or to atta s tit
front
corner
20' setback), parking would
or rear side of the house in
nave
order
il[frlFt
n$t,
to be to be
house
located on either the southwest
out of the setback area. Du It location of the !s
in the front and side setbacks.Staff feels that to allow encroachments beyond
the first memo would be a grant of special privilege.what was originally appToV6'd-in
The app'lican! 4as giv tback variance and a l2 foot fro
varl ance.snows lna
e front setback and 14 feet into e side setback. The encroadhments -are way beydhd what was originafly-intended in the previous variance approvals.
The required front setback of 20'
- has now been encroached upon up to the maximum
P9iqt. The current variance iequest extends 8 feet beyond the original approved '12 foot front setback variance.'The required l5 foot -side setback-variantb is
.encroached upon up to 14 feet. This encroachment is 3 feet beyond the originally
approved side setback variance of ll fee
The requested vari lem for
ocated
completelv on the nrhl ic right-of-way. The new parking spaceJi'TF6TfiT the
The effect gf the.requested varia4ce on light and gir, distribution of population,
@
r.;u[u reLer v on Ine PUollc r]gnr-or-way. Ine new parKlng space tn Tron[ oT
garage was never intended to be completely out in the public right-of-way
, tr when the original request came through the Planning Commission. Mnrpover, thg VtPl st
' should be no further encroachments onto the pqb'lic right-of-way jn this area.
Qrfi r0 e JUrStf €U<-eo+Ctttvrer.tif
wtlhorLt grant of spec
se approximatly 13 feet jnto the
and enforcement
the s. Because o ocation of the house in t e Tro nt
As was stated in the previous he existin house
It is felt that a reasonable so]ution d in the first variance
stenhef] z/zs/a5
S#g?rlller factor the commission deems applicable to the proposed varl ance .
FI ND I NGS
Llg=lJglnjns urld Enui"onr"ntur co*itrion thuil ruk. th" foilonino findinss b"fo."granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties class'ified in the same district.
That.the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the pub)ic health,sgfgty' or welfare, or materially injurious to propert'ies or imprbvementi-in-il'"vi ci ni ty.
That the variance is warranted for one
The strict or literal interpretation
would result in practical difficultv with the objectives of this tiile. -
There-are exceptions or extraordinary the site of the variance that do not
same zone.
or more of the following reasons:
and enforcement of the specified regulation or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent
circumstances or conditions applicable to apply generally to other propei^iies in the
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges en;oyec uv the owners or ottrei-pioperties in the same district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
lkl::if.fiitilili::]iilii ii,fll}i'!,liltlii'filr :i:;.ffi:,il in.'fft,t?t ,*:w'*.side setback variance of 14 feet. rt is evident thii ";.;-il;r;; it.'[Jirillo""" (y ,iffir:-irutlr:il;* {swft,.
k.u 0\+J *\ .''{J$i\f,ff1-U$ffifggn'rter,eJ t\-{'st
Hn^*a.n
* *'\huY*[-r*
^'ilr-xs*;*um'$t 0-t\ l'\$l(J/Lty't
$i\\ $*t^aul 'l' r \ \r' x \v':fu[#[$suo
s^[ ffi4w;*ffisil$$gkt
Planning and Environmental Commission
February ll, .|985
PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Duane Piper
Howard Rapson
Jere lJalters
ABSENT
Jim Viele
Duane Piper, chairman, called the meeting to order at 3:00 pm.
Donovan moved and l.lalters_seconded to approve the minutes of the meeting of January 28. Vote was 4-0.
1. Request for a final pla!,revlew 9f vgil wood! subdivjsion, a revision
ea
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylman
Dave Peel , representing the applicant, requested tabling until
Rapson moved and Walters secon4ed to iable as requesteO] Vote
March I I .
was 4-0.
tfora setback variance and a concurrent GRFA variance in order
enc lose a hot tub area ich wou uare feet to
o.and enc lose a area .of tuse Condomi ni rrms 83 l.li'llow Place'on LofJ Block 6 Vail Villa Fi 1i nq.p I,i cant : Ri c orri s
Ra mgyed and l,Jalters seconded to a rove the as memo. The vote was 4-0 in favor.l
2.
to
en
at
en
Tom Braun made the staff presentation, explaining the request and that the staff recormended.approval of the setback variance, bu[ denial 'of the variance for UKFA. uavid Peel' representing the app'l icant, Rjchard Torrisi, gave a presentation and explanation of the request.
on moved and Donovan seconded to de the GRFA variance uest on the grounds
errace.
f t it wou an qran ng oT spec vr Iege.
o
3
denial.
st for setback variances and a co nc u rrent GRFA variance in order to
an uare Too[ a on oa res nce on Lo cants: Howard a rginia Sherr
Kristan Pritz explained the request for setback varjances on three sjdes of
!!.^:l!: and the request for a GRFA variance of an additional 50 square-reet ln order to expand the dining room area of the structure. The staff reconrnendation was for approval of the setback variances and denial of the GRFA varianie.
fflltlru -2-
Richard Sherr, applicant,. spoke on his behalf, exp'laining his overa'l'l p'lan to
upgrade the structure and property. The Planning Conrnisiion discussed'the hardshlp 'in. the Bighorn Terrace units, precedence set by others in Bighorn Terrace, and other items.
Donovan moved and R .
Donovan moved and l,lalte!:s. secon9ed to ria4ce.
of the gPecified regulation would result in pract'ical difficulty or unnecessary physical -hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the title, and would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the'
same distict.
The vote was 3-l in favor with Piper voting against approva'l_. Piper,s reason G type'of request
and campaigned for an ordinance to deal with this situation.
4. Beque:t tg amgld the zoning.cgde by the addition of paragraph 18.22.030N in order to allow as a conditional use, eating, drinki
,Inc.
Kristan Pritz gave the staff presentation and explained that the staff was
recormending approval . The applicant's presentation was given by Art Abplanalp.
The discussion by the Planning Comm'issioncenteredon the need foi the amendment,the conditiona'l use process, and allowable percentages of GRFA as commercial
space.
Patten gave an update on the Spraddle Creek Subdivision proposal and requested
a motion to change the hearing date to March 25. Donovan moved and l.taliers
secgndqd to chanqe the date as requested. The vot@on
aqa i nst.
6. Update on Parks Master Planning Project.
Pritz and Donovan gave the parks planning update.
il
The meeting was adjourned at 4:46.
5.
RaPsotl,mov,ed ?!rrd t!g'lters seconded to recommend approval to the Town Council
hear i n zonin raddl e subdivision.
I
tNc.GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS.
A99 LOGAN STREET ' SUITE 600
OENVER. COLORADO AO2O3
TELEPHONE (303) 437.1 700
Januanq 25, 1985
Wt. Steve Pa,ttuaon
Bui,Lding Depattnent, Toutn o( VaLL
75 South Fttontage Road alut
Vai,L, CoLonado 81 658
Dzan Wt. Pall.etuon
I ooa.t both tunpn Lted and emba.tus.ued to LQfiLn tlla.t wz had ndde a mi'ststze on
the Loc-a.ti-on o( the (ttont, wot-I's o$ the gahnge be,tng bui,X't undeh a, van'i-anee al
756 Foze,tt Rooi. 'I inn a,saune qoi that. tnit ni'ttatze- usa.t inndvetutent and
accidentnL. r an modt lwpe{u'x- Vhnt wnat we have bu'iJ't' ia not a lvLndn'ance to
e.i.then the Town o,L ou)L ne,Lghbou.
T da aytpnec,i-a.te. velLq much qoun tenponani-Lt4 Ii(ting the "ned tng ha!.t". t3
eonttutcLLoi'ottenhene on- the *Lte. "l cnn give qou poti-tive oa^u^ance tha.t the
wontz now being pendonned undott qoun (onebe-anance i-t comple-te.tq unnelated to the
gilnge and do1,s' rwi .5untna,t Lncj"zam-tlte vaXues in ieaptondq tha.t wou,td be ne,La.tzd
7o the pottlbLe dzwLaL o( the addi-tional voi,Lanez u)e a.tLe stec1uuLLng to tolvz oun
pnttbX-ena.
Tl+anlz qou [on qoun hind undetutand'Lng.
VLaA bu/LA UoM n
//h,'*/ #tl,*,
A. Etwp,t Stepher{ton, Jn.
Publ-i-'shen
V*LL tM.gazino
List of the nanes of owners of
Maria Theresa Gomez
c/o Cardenas, P,A.
251 Crandon Blvd. lll037
Key Biscayne, FL. 33L49
Cynthia Fowler Jacobson
P.O. Box 538
Vail, Colorado 81658
all property adjacent Eo
i ?- tl nl) c
.r .r I '! L\'
r (<l {}lL u
t-' 'i
Lr t)
Property:. A
f Cun( t +*{-
/- ., r /., (+ - -
t t-o _-_ D
-t, t L
, J- \ y -\,xv
J),gC
the subject
S, l7-l4'
^,-q )'
(. L-
Robert D. and Marie M. Working
503 Mount Evans Road
Golden, Colorado 80401
,,r. ,.',.-.Ll
./ r/p t
The applicant is requesting an extension of the set back variance
granted on August 8, 1984. This variance alloned a 12' variance on a 20r front setback and an 11' variance on a 15r side setback.
This extension request ls made necessary by errors nade during construction. Speciflcally, exceeding the side variance by approximately
tno feet and exceeding the front variance by approxirately 8 feet.
The original variance allowed a garage to be built with 300 square feet of floor space and 77 square feet of storage, A totaL of. 377 square feet. The errors made have produced a garage vith approxinately 319
square feet of floor space and approximately 151 square feet of storage.
A total of 480 square feet. The difference betrreen the original variance
and actual existing building being 103 square feet. Tttis additional
square footage is still well within allowable area figures for this lot.
Both the applicant and contractor acknowledge they have made a
gross error by not adhering strictly to the construction plans and elevations
whlch were submitted and approved by the building and planning departoents,
and that these departments should have been consulted prior to proceeding with construction. Ilovever, they wouLd like it to be noted that even
had the building been constructed in accordance nith the approved plans,it would still have exceeded the variance lrhich was granted.
The applicant elso feels that the stlucture as it exists meeta
the concerns addressed in the original granted variance. That it does not impact negatively on traffic flow, snow removal, utility maintenance or, because of the underground construction of the building, on visual
concerns of adjacent properties. That it does provide more than required off street parklng and is in general an improvement of existing conditions.
I.
Appl ication
PEC MEETING DATE , -J>'- gs
ApplrcRnon FoR A vARTANcE
any project requesting a variance.infonnation is submitted.
A.^NA'E 0F APPLICANTGT**r-z..- c""^-.,*.. -,. *^r I
ADDRESS *q q r-,.-y, A^r
This procedure is required will not be accepted until
for
all The app'l i cation
g3-l'l.roe
PH0NE qrG - ,rrto
PH0NE {1b.r31L
c\NAME OF 0t.lNER(s)
ADDRESS
PHONE
\0.LOCATION qF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS -1ii
LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N L0T1r BL0CK_I__FILTNG
\l
E.\FEE
THE
YOU
$roo enn ?/*fys- cK #_ZtFt:_FRot4
FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP
ld/1 4
DEPARTMENT l,,ILL ACCEPT R PROPOSAL.
xF.| list of the names of_owners of all property
IllglllglNc pRopERTy BEHTND AND ACRoSS srn'eErs-,THE APPLICANT hlILL BE RESPON'IEIi-FON-.6NNECT
adj.acent to the subject property
and their mailing aOdresies.
MAILING ADDRESSES.
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH.A.PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED T0)DETERMINEIFANY'ADDITIoNAL iHFonr'rniron-ii Hilbla.-i'ro npplrcnTr0N tlrLL BE ' ACCEPTED uNLEss IT Is C0MPLFIF (mlsr. irlifurjt iirf-iiir'r! REquTRED By rHE zgNrNG flgILN$IR4IgBl.- II Is rHE neFr-iCnnrg nrtFoNsreriiii'ro MAKE AN ApporNrMENr I''ITH THE srAFF T0 FIND Our neo0i-nDotiloNAl-Iuduifrnl nsqurnEr,tENTs.
tl$sl-lglt-rlt3T^l.tgLLqEjlPlIqfIIoN }{rLL STREMLTNE THE AppRovAL pRocEss FoR Y0uR PROJEcr ev-oecnEAsINFrHe rluNern or ioloirio'l'rl-oi nppnovAl THAT THE pLANNTNc AND ENvIRoNMENTAL^coMMIssI0N'-MAv-ltiryalfi, -ni!-Conoirr0Ns
0F AppRovAL MUsr BE coMpLrED ilrrH BEFoRE n euil-DrNc'pEm,|li-ii-issli-Ei.'-..:, , ,:
III. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOI.IING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A.
flEHu8ffiffiTxl*rErFu.
o"J|rrllf
E,f fi rrill8l,^i5rrlsrxtllANc E REQUESTED AND THE
l.' Il:.r:l:.:g::It":l ll"_19qt:lled,variance to.other existins or potential uses and structures in the'vicinity.
The degree to which rerief from the strict or riterar interpretation and enforcement of a specifiea regutition-ri.n"."ssary.to achieie compatibirity :11^:il:9yi!r.?l tflp.n!.ifiong siiei-in tne vitinitv-6"-io attain the
2.
objectives of this tit're without grant or tp"iiii-plirir"b.
ri
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
i' This procedure is required for any-project requesting a variance. The appl .ication will not be accepted untir art inioimaiion is'suumilieo.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT
I ADDRESS AJ
r tr, A {5i-l - r-loo V \ _".
H0NE___s:-e:_s:.g_e
B. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS
Apii r -;i: ::
PEC MEETING DATE 3 -ps- -tr:-
PHONE
C. NAME 0F 0WNER(S) (type or prin
n- | qrc-(S
ADDRESS
n
PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS ?SL i=ona=;xr f"_\>
L EGAL D ESC R I pT ION LOT_13_B LoC K____l__F I L I NG
FEE groo pArp +) c* u1#-roo*_
M_FqF MUST BE pArD #F0RE THE COMMUNTTy DEVEL0PM
YOUR PROPOSAL.
F.{. list of the names of owners of all property
llt!Lrl?lNG pROpERTY B!HIryD AND AcRoss SrnEtrs,THE APPLicANT l,jlLL BE RESPON.IeiE-Foa-iiinnecr
adjacent to the subject property
and their mailing addresses.
MAILING ADDRESSES.
II.A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED T0)DETERMINEIFANY'ADDITI0NAL iruFonuniibt t! nrEoea.'-ruolppircnrroN wrLL 8E ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS^COMPLFII (NtISi i'iilqqq ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRAToR)' IT Is rHE npFriCRli's nEspor,rsisrLiiV-ro-ilnre nr RppoTNTMENT tlrrH rHE srAFF T0 FrND our neo[i-ADolirbr,rnr ![eMiiini nEqirihEMENTs.
3*IS:^IqiF-T!IT-4 qgg$]q_APPLiCATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT gv oEcRETSJRG-THr r,rur'ratR-dF_c0NDirr0Ns-oF npi;novAL THAT THE pLANNING AND ENVIR0NMENTAL collMlssION r'rnV-UiipuinlE:- 4L! coNDrrroNs 0F AppR6vAL MUST BE COMPLIED I.IITH BEFORE N EUII-DING'PENr,rii_rS ISSUED.
F0uR (4) COprES 0F THE F0LLOWING MUST BE SUBMTTTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEM.ENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATI0N INV0LVED. THE srATEMEnr uusr nrso noon'eii:"'-
The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the'vicinity.
The degree to which rerief from the strict or riteral .i nterpretation and enforcement of a specifreo reguliiio;-i;.necessary.to achieve compatibility and unifonnity of treatnent ailong sites in the vitinitv-o" io attain the objectives of this tiile without-grani-or riliiii-p;irir.s..'
c
@
&"- Joo,,,',
t/r ''
LIST OF MATER IALS
NAME OF.PROJECT:
.LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P
The following information is required for submittal
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL
,-
o
,f Slc
n qlair.s Roof
Si di ng
Other Wall Materials
f?
Ia
OrfrO( S ne-\
cilar
cJ"r
Fasci a
Soffi ts
t^li ndows
l,li ndow
Doors
Trim
6otv2t'
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ash'i ngs
Chi mneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
pnone:
PLANT I'IATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botanical Name
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*Indicate cal'i per for deciducious trees.
Common Name Quan'i ty Si ze*
Bl,re -*n,rc.
Bnsilc Co,tc F.g
for conifers.
(over)
A<- fly,,ool o, B' slo;,1
Indicate height
'PLANT MATERIALS:
(con ' t)
SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
GROUND COVERS
v
Botanical Name
Tvpe
Cornmon Name Quani ty Si ze I
i
:!
Square Footage
SOD Grws <s t Columbi'^c ' l-u fiq<'
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls' fences,swimming pools, etc.) Please specify.
6
75 soulh lronlage road
vail, colotado 81657
(303) 476-7000 ottlce ol communlty develoPmenl
August 16' 1984
Richard and RosemarY Hel 1er
756 Forest Road
Vail, Colorado, 81657
RE : Lot 12, Bl ock I Va i'l Vi I I age 6th
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Heller'
0n August 15, 1984, the Design Review Board gave final-approval to the
H"riei-g."i!6, adoition ano fiarking area. The Design-Review Board
uppior"i th6 project ioniing';nt up6n_the submjssio-n of.the plans for
il; ;i;i. and'reiaining *ari to the planning staff . It was a'lso
recormended that:
1. The parapet wall above the garage should be reviewed by staff'
2. The stair 'l ighting should not cause a glare'
3.Theredshutterco]orshouldnotclashw.iththerooforrooftrim.
4. Additional or alternative shrubs may be used in the retaining wal1 area'
|,lell, it looks like you made it through the process' Congratulations on your
proj ec t !
S'i ncere'ly ',) \ 4..\
Kt,tbr. Y, d?
Kri stan Pritz
Town Planner
KP . rme
75 south lrontage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 off lce ot communlly develoPmenl
August 16, l9B4
NeIson King
P. 0. Box 3303
Vail, Colorado, 81658
RE: Lot 12, Block I Vail Village 6th
Dear Mr. King,
0n August 15, .|984, the Design Review Board gave final,approval to the
iellei garage, addition and parking area. Thg Design-Review Board
ipprouui th6 project contingbnt upon the submission of the plans for
tire stair and reiaining wall to the P1 anning Staff. It was also
recommended that:.
l. The parapet wall above the garage should be reviewed by staff.
2. The stair lighting should not cause a g'l are'
3. The red shutter color should not clash with the roof or roof trim.
4. Additional or alternative shrubs may be used in the retaining wa] 'l area'
Well, jt looks like you made it through the process. Congratulations on your
proj ect !
Sincerely'..;.\ r.\
fufiu".t rh
Kri stan Pri tz
Town Planner
KPlrme
o Profect Appllcation
Projecl Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legat Descriplion: t-.ot 11
Commenls:
Design Review Board
""," bu$ \s, \qvt
141'tJl
rl
l&,rf,i- E {hr,"
:.|i\ I(t
i\\,.., \,.nt \i.rr',
Dale:
Town Planner E statt Approval
It,iilli trt: t'r(0.;Lct'
Lli(:AL Dt;ticl{ il,'t'IOti : l,o
Dti:icR II'Ltol.l ol.- Pno.il;c'I
Thc fol I or*,i ng informat j.on is
Board bci'ore a final approval
A. BUILIIIi.I(: I{A,'IERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other l{al I lvtaterial s
Fas c ia
Soffits
l{inriorvs
l{indow Trim
Doors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck Rails
F lues
Flashi.ngs
Chirmre4y'
Trash Encl osures
Greenhorrs es
.\ tl oEher ?DLY|ll"U $t
aPPrPPs - I ' .l
ALt/
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES
Botanica'l Name
requircd for subrnittal by
can be givcn:
Ure._sr_Itg&f
thc applicant to thc Dcsillr ltcvietv
Color
,,ttrwy %
Cormon Name Si ze
lo-lzo-
lp:ll"-
fu30'
AO
Quanti ty
I
---J--
iErceL^'rgfi'uE
rlA-
ALIA
SHRUBS J,rrir
/f "TffenF,T:rf %-L1ar.
o
I
o
SQUARE GROUND
covERs
SEED/
FOOTAGE
SQUARE FooTAGE s0D
TYPE
'QUARE
FoorAGE lDb f bn>t
?L-^rf
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD
OF EROSION CONTROL
C. 0ther Landscape Features (retaining wal'l s, fences, swirming pools, etc.) P'lease specify.o/-
5
I
--
I
.'
!
I
I
i
I
,.1
I
t-
r{]',
);,
.j
Y,tf F ,ttt
I
Q'';,
I'r t't.
ii
"t
+-
Y^
+i',! !
. -^+\*
'.-.-- "1'-rl.:;'-'-", -*.:.*, - {t j
h\CL..
73{-/:1 r'trd
..i.i, i t):E=t:,r:11 ,
'._.lt l=l
i=l t=t
.-<F-"
Yt'-^+
I
i i
;(
'{II
ll
1r
il
I
Gt-s F &
&O-1 \-i
,il
*/o
t:
[*
{'
.ll
i-i,'
z 4 d-
I
d q-
4 t o 2 4 J
i
I
&_
F N-
,s fL_it
t
.t
.L
I I
I I
J
s,o.
:'
W(
)ffi
t
t
I
t----
-d -F
I
I
I I o
r-1,
I
I
.n- -''
.lr.
'''r'f'
'{.
)w.
c
t-t-a
i "",&.++.^r:,:r,i-.aF+i 'fl1 '',"+1
I
I
I
I
I
I J
d D
I t
T
a,
ll
at
CY r\
-+
:
I ii o
CT
+-s
t
I
{\
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ ECT :
Planning uno?i.onmental Commission
Community Deve'lopment Department
. August 13, .l984
A request for side and front setback variances to construct a garage
and to enclose an area underneath a deck on Lot 12, Block 1, Vail Village
6th F'iling, 756 Forest Road. Applicant: Richard Heller
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
The applicant js request'i ng front and side setback vari ances in order to construct one single car garage on the east side of the piolierty and to add an aaa;,iion:io tn"existing house. Because almost half of the existing house is located in irre tront setback' a varjance is required for both the additi6n and for the garage. The proposed garage.extends approximately i1 feet into the side setback ind l2 ieet"into ihe'tront setback. The new addition is.approx'imately 13 feet into the front setback. In addition,a.solarium hallway will be addei'onto the iouth siOe or tne-buiijing-ina-a'new'oecr will connect with an.existing deck in the front of the building creiiln! i JJct-arouno the entjre house that also connects onto walkways.leading to another reir deck. The balconl on the front side of the house would extend into the set6aii< ilto;a th;;e,ii;r;d amounr.Presently, the ba'lcony is 2 feet i"om-itre property line.- given the location of the existing house, the front and side setback variances are needed for the tarage ano a front setback for the proposed add.ition and deck.
Two parking spaces are needed to meet the unit's parking requirement. One space is provided by the new garage. The second space (previousiy eiisting):s roiaiia-in front of the new garage.- The.applicant_ls atsb iequuiting to roiite-a'pi"iing'u""u in front of the existinghouse in-the public right-of-ruy. "the appiiiant'ii'-re{uesting the additional park'ing to solve a chrbnic probiem ot peirpte partihg on if,e-strdet.The parking area is not needed to meet a pirking requirement. rnii parking a"ei was previously-fPPloved the Design.Review aoai"o in Septdmuer igiz. ine ippiovii-irii stnce expired- The Town of Vait Engineer has approvea wiitr conditions the ibcation oi tn"unenc'losed parking area. The-applicant hii agreed. to rewori the north uornairy orainage system and to install a culvert'ht tris expens6 on his piope"tv. 1re ippiiCini"tas also agreed not to remonstrate aga'inst thb town of Vaii ii-sn6w is oivbi^ted onto his parking area in front of the-house by Town of vail sno"plows.
..'',.-'
GRFA FIGURES:
Primary/Secondary zoni ng
Site area: 45,500 square feet
Al'lowed GRFA: 6,025 square feet
Existing GRFA: First Floor
Second Floor
565.5 sq ft
870.0 sq ft
1435.5 sq ft Total Existing GRFA
He'ller -4- A/Aleq '\
(
Proposed construction:
Addi ti on
Garage
Garage Storage
Solarium Hallway
plus existing GRFA
Total
Garage credit
Storage credit
297 sq ft
300 sq ft
77 sq fl
128 sq ft
I435.5 sq ft
2237.5 sq ft
300
{
Total GRFA with addit'ion 1860.5 sq ft
Parking requirement: 2 spaces
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
n review of riteria Fi ndi nqs Secti on
.|8.62.060 of the MuniciPal Code, the
rtment o n'it evelopment recoffine roval o ues var'l ance
actors:
de to which rel ief the strict or literal inte retation and enforcement
as re ation is necessary to ac eve ty and un rmlty o
ecttves o e without
grant of special Prlvr lege'
Tt" v*"] i-t".at "f the one-car garage in the front and s'ide setbacks are being
'itiriitji.O Uv lJiigning-trre structuie s6 that it is constructed at street level into
the hillside. Th; siiucture wil'l be earth-she'ltered. Landscaping w'ill also be-added
on-top oi ttre garage-to minimjze some of the impacts of the.structure. The addition
that \s locatei beieath the present open deck should have minimal impacts on the
existing structures in the vicinity, ls it is merely an infill project.
The parking area in front of the house shou'ld alleviate the prob'lem of cars parking
6ii-th" it"E"t. Vail Associates uses Forest Road for their snow cat access up the
ski mountain. ffre aefign-nouia *ou" parked cars away from Forest Road alleviating -
iii;;i;ii;sj-puiriing-i"6drlr. -presenlty, 3 unpaved -parkins areas and two paved parkins
areas exist in the neighborhood that are similar to the proposed parking. Public
Works department a'l so feels that the parking area would make'it easier for them to
plow Forest Road. The applicant proposes to pave and landscape the parking. The
overall impact of the parking will be minimal and wil1 help to solve a park'ing
problem.
t
The existing house was built prior to the ex'isting setback.requirements'. Eecause
ii-tne iocalion of the nouse in the front setback, (approximately 13 ft into the
ironi ZO foot setback), parking would have to be located on either the southwest
coiner or rear siae of'the houie in order to be out of the setback area. Due to
ite ailf.icult location of the existing house, staff feels that in order to achieve
iJmoatibilit.y amonq iites, jt would n6t Ue a grant of spec'ia1 privilege to al'low
if,e'Si"ig" a-na aaai-tion to be located in the front and side setbacks.
{
ftte" -3- B/B/84
To allow the parking area in the public right-of-way would also not be a grant of
specia'l privilege, as the existing house is located jn such a way that the required
size parking spaces could not be placed in front of the house. The distance from
the house to the property line js approximately 8 feet t. The required length for
a parking space is 19 feet, and the width is 9 feet.
Because of these hardships which exist and the fact that similar vari ances have been
granted in the area, the staff feels that the grant'i ng of this variance request will
not constitute a special privilege.
Such other factors and criteria the commi ssion deems licable to the proposeo varl ance.
the public health,
improvements in the
The effegt of the,reques=led=vaf!Enge on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation ald traffic facj l itjes
The proposal will improve the parking situation for this siteby locating one parking
space with'in an enclosed structure on the owner's property. The parking area located !l tl," public.right-of-way has been approved by thb Tbwn i:ngineer. It is fett that the improved dra'inage, additional culvert, and removal of cirs off the street is a reasonable trade-off for allowing the parking in the public right-of-way. The project will impact transportation and traffic-in a posjtive way.
RELATED POLICIES IN VAIL'S COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN
This-proposa'l is related to policy No. 2 under the community Design section of the corrnunity Act'ion Ptan. The p61icy states that upgradin-g and iemoaeilng ot structures and site improvements should be encouraged. staif feels that tie remodeling and addjtional garage will be an improv6ment to this projeCi. -
FINDINGS
ffrrg,,f ]u!n.rnq uld Enui"onr.ntur co*rirrion rhur r ruk" th" for ro*ing findinq, b"for"granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a_grant of spec.i al privilege incons'istent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to sgfqty' or welfare, or material 1y injurious to properties or vi ci ni ty.
f'L
That the variance is warranted for one
The strict or l'iteral interpretation
would result in practicai difficulty
with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary
the site of the variance that do not
same zone.
HeJ -+- 8/8/84 .
or more of the following reasons:
and enforcement of the specified regulation
or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent
circumstances or conditions appl'icable to
apply generally to other properties in the
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the appl'icant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of othei properties in the same district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approval of the front and side setback variances for the new garage' front s.etback variance for the addition and_deck. The applicant has aqreed io hand'le all drainage problems and to install a Cutveit-on:tiis-FiopEiiy."'i,,';'ltFpli-cant has-also agreed not to remonstrate against any snoh, accumuliting lir tne parking area in front of the house due-to.snowplowing. Th; Town.of Vail engineer-tris'inrorreo the applicant.that snow from^plowing wir.lrbe'pushed inio ine parklnd aiea in-front of the house. The staff recoirnends approval or itre-pro'posii 6eiauie'there are extraor{ing!"y circumstances on this sitb'that do not airpty gtner;iit-io-;ii,;r properties in the same zone.
t
t,
I
\
\
)
\)
o
rD 3 \g 4b {L-<]:
v4 -o
<I C{
J.
9 v-6 o 4
c
u)
n
I o-
I
4
lU {)L
c I 4
o
I ,t'
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
ul cr-
b'I
l.l
UJ
tl
C\
I sr-I
^_2 9-5
J
4 .l
{,
t.5
6-{x
nl
>J !
;-F
,I
u.,rlft ${'i
-'x'.Irj \l-$ ()
\ft r'-
q tu
I
:\lt-'
I
I
I
(.-. 15 (
-t-\ \.-r \r
'/
\t
3r\
\j\'4',1 ,(;e
-1::
:a /A 'a I'
t*
i -c ,;-_I i';
.}-,1
-a
{
'i{J .c.
f;\r i
u
O
Pl ann i ng and Environmental Commission
August 13, 1984
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Howard Rapson
Gordon Pierce , Duane P'iper
,Jim Viele
ABSENT
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Kristan Pritz
Tom Braun
Larry Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
Peter Patten reminded the board that this item had been tabled from the last meeting because.the applicant had-changg{ his request by increasing ihe square-rioiigl of the proposed enc'losure from 76*.to-170-squard feet. Patten siitea tndt the stiii-suggesteo that the-applicant wait uniil the corfounity-oevelopment oepartment stiff, ihe council and the PEC amived at a new system to deai wittr iheJe tvpbs or proposali.- -
.$l:o.l.Iitg, representing -the appl icant, stated that the appl icant did not want to walc wltll the chance of missing the buil.ding_season this yblr. Pierce suggested that
9*,.3ttll.ll!_9: lfre decr abov6 now, ino apiti:*tren irre-n[w resulations were in-pilie (taking a chance that he-would get the variinle then). The mdbers fe]t that it'would
f9 q srant of special privilege-to grant the variini6. viele moved and pierce seconded Eo oeny the request per the staff recommendation. The v
Scott Edwards
The
l.
2.
meeting was called to order at l:30 by Duane piper, chaiyman.
Approval of minutes of July 23 meetinq.
Viele moved and Rapson seconded to approve the minutes as written. Vote was 5-0.
for side and front se to enclose
Kristan Pritz exolained that the.applicant wanted-to build one.single-car garage on the east side of'the property-ina-i5.iji in iiiaition to'i6e-e*.,.rrng nouse prus a solarium hallway.and iew'.dec-ks and parking in front of thJ-house in the existinq right-of-wav. This park'ins area wa! appr6ved by the DRB in 5;;;.rt"r"igii'ina"iloura
PgFly alleviate the probl6m of cars pbiting in"trit-sireei"(ano pubtic Works feels this would also make it easier to ploir ilre ioiJ). -priii-"eiievred the rest of the merno.
ariances to construct a qara
tc 8!13ts4 -z-
-
Piper asked for an explanation of the final.landscaping, and Richard Heller, the applicant' stated-that on the street side there wouia le terraces with f'lowers ind slrryU:: Nelson King, who is the on the project, stated that he wouiO-wort<with the Town engineer.. Piper felt that the cumeirt berm-and iiraiijiititg wii'i nice buffer' and so it was.important to know what the new landscaping wouil uE.'-ine height of the terraces was discussed and Patten read Sections te.5b.oZ0 A & B:- HeilJn King repeated that it would also depend upon what the Town engineer iequirtJ.--
Viele moved and Rapson seconded to rove the variance uests because t ranti n ot the variances woul0 not cons a qrant ot specia vl leqe, wou trimental to ic hea or welfare to rties or rovements ance was warra au se re were ex ons or extraordi nary ci rcurnstances a cable to site t varl ance not app'l general'l.v to other properties in the-s-alne zone.n Tavor.
Pierce forwarded to DRB the concern that there should be more
because he felt the scale of the buildings was not accurate.
accurate drawings,
he
no
No. 4 on the agenda was to be considered last.
5. Request for exterior alteration in Conmercia'l Core II in order to remodel the
Tom Braun exp'lained that the staff was recormending tabling until the applicant re-subrnit. a complete application. He added that the appliiant had left'i pnoni
message that stated that if he did not get to the meetiirg, that a worf sisiion-Ue
sc hedul ed .
novan moved and Pierce s to table this i until the I icant suhn tted cati on one Dro or eac vot'e was
est to amend 0rdinance 30 Seri es of 1977 to increase the number of units
a cons a a tch Drive, from us one employee unit to 36 us one o.yee unit ot b. utoc otato Patch.
pp cant:
Kristan Pritz explained the request, and stated the applicant's rationale for the requested 6 additional units. She presented project tilmparisons between the
ll?i?Y"d gligllut project and the_proposed prbjeit. inct,uding density, site coverage,helght' setbacks, parking, site plans, landscap'i ng, and architecture. pritz then used variance criteria_,to,analyze the proposal qld listed other properties zoned by ordinances that limited the nuhber ot lltbwea units, adding that theie propeiii-s couta make,similar requests to increase their number of allowed units if it cbuli be justified
by the site plan. Pritz stated that the staff recorrnended denial Ueiause io-grint the-request would set a precedent, because the revised site plan did not wa"rini tf,"additional units, and it'would be-a grant oi speiiat privilege.
plannins una t*'entat commission dr^Uffiq)
lil:.it i:1,,,"".",',:,,*::-,.",ffi.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ ECT :
and to enclose an area underneath a deck on Lot'l 2, Block l, Vail Village
6th Fi'ling, 756 Forest Road. Appl icant: Richard Heller
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
'i \
. rr l -
\, fi
Y ',
' 'r ,);'r' -r\,
ffi
The applicant is
one sinqle'
provi
inq a
previously approved the Desi expired. The T
unenclosed parking area. The
system and to install a culve
nt and side setbac;1 vari in order to construct
lon'to the
ces are needed to meet the unit's narkin . One space is
meet a t. This parking area was rd in Sept . The approval has since
ons the location of the as approveo w
applicant has agreed to rework the north hOun.lafy .lr^a i nagg his expense on his y. The applicant has also agreed not to remon3ti6 aga i nst I if snow is diverted onto his par r the house by Town.of Va
GRFA FIGURES:
Pri mary/Secondary zon r ng
Site area: 45,50
provloeo Dy f,ne new garage.front of the new qaraqe.
second space (previously existing) is located in garage.. Theapplicant_tr
9 . The app-Iicant is request.ing l ;m
Allowed GRFA:
Existing GRFA: First Floor
Second Floor
Total Existinq GRFA
n |.fl 'ilr.j
565.5 sq ft
870.0 sq ft
'. v eli!-Ling house. Because almost ha]f of the exist'ing house is located inffionF-
\O^ lllll!k:._3^I9li1!:: i:_I:gyired for.both the addi.tion and for.the garase. rhe prJposed t Nlr_ . ':SdgY- gal"9se, extqlds appro:1jm?tely ll feel.intn:rhg-side sethack. and l2 feet-into thET?bn-T_,lt r {pthack- Thp npw addifinn ic rnnr.nwimr*al r,, 'l? faa+ inta +ha f-^-+ ^^+L-^r. r- -rrrri.l"'n?.k:The.newadditionis.approximatelyl3feetintotner!9@ion,a.solarium hallway will be added'onto the -sdfth-TTile-f th-tbui rorng ano a new oeck
.( will connect with.an ex,isting deck in the front of the building creiting a deck around 4l ., Ene ent'lre house that also connects.onto walkways leading to another reir deck. The balconv ;ffi{r*gn the.front. side of the house would extena ini'o-tnE-set6air ilio;a th;-;eqi';i;a"jhoiiii""'N:V Presently, the balcony is 2 feet from the property 1ine. Given-the tneerinn of the
$,cr- .existilg hgyse, the front and side setback variances are neeEi--for the garage-l?icl
Heller -2- 8/8/84
Proposed construction:
, , , Addition
Garage
Garage Storage
Solarium Hallway
plus existing GRFA
Total
- Garage credit
Storage credjt
297
300
77
128
1435.5 sq ft
2237.5 sq ft
- 300 -77
sq ft
sq ft
sq ft
sq ft
Parking requirement: 2 spaces
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of lhe Municipal Code, the
based upon the followinq factors:
The relatiotlship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and
The visual impacts of the one-dar garage in
minimized by designing the structul
the hi
that is located beneath the present open deck should have minimal 'impacts on-fhE--existing structures in the vicinity, as it is merely an infill project.
tlle billsi.Oe- The structure w'ill be earth-qhpltered. LandJEaFiI'ElTITalso be added ol top of the garage to minimize some of the impacts ofThe structure. The addition
the front and side setbacks are being
ructed at street level ilto
s necessa
amonq sites in t ormlty o
grant of special privileqe.e without
V, s/B/84
To allow the parking area i n the pub'l i c ri ght-of -way wou'l d a1 so not be grant of
special privilege, as uir
rkinq spaces cou not be placed 'i n front of t
the eef,
a space rs eet, a
Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems a licable to the osed
Fi ND I NGS
Jlgrllgnning_Sng,EnYironrnental Connnission shalI make tne tottowinq tina.inqs uetore grantrnq a variance:
.lslliii?llil'1"ll iffi*f;t+
not constitute a special privilege.
The effegt,9f the,reque=s=t-ed.vaf!qnce on light and air, distribution of population,
transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities affi pub-fc-ETAE.
The proposal will improve the parking situation for this site!y locating orc-,oarking
space within an_enclosed structure on the ovlle_Il! p_IgPerty. The parking area EEfEd i -engineer. It il__teJ=llbel tle improyed drainaqe, additional crr'lvFFt, a"d'removal ef si'^s nff the m a-rgasgnalJg lrade-off for al'tow'inq the parkinq in the pubtic right-of-w;t:Jhe proJect wt ll jmpact transportation and traffic in a positive way.
RELATTO pOLtctEs tN vRtL's coMilurulry Rctton puN
This proposal is rel
the commirni., o".,onTi:n:Tflli{, T:,, 3r:i::ill: :;[T:l]lU 3ffi':ffi::il;! Si structures and site improvements should be encouraged. staif feels that the remodeling and additional garage will be an improvEment to this project.
That the granting of the variance wjll not inconsistent with the limitations on other
That the granting of the variance will not safety, or welfare, or material 1y injurious vicinity.
constitute a grant of special privilege
propert'ies classified in the same district.
be detrimental to the public health,to properties or improvements in the
lJ-o- 8/8/84
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
The strict or ljteral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regu'l ation
would result in practical d'ifficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the
same zone.
The strict or literal -interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation
would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of othei propert'ies 'in the same district.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approval of the front and side stlback variances fofi.hrnqg eiri:il,Jr:it:9,lu e
cant has-also agreed not to remonstrate against any snow accumuliti'ng t-n tne parting afea in ffOnt Of the hOuSe drrp to qnnwnlnwinn Tho Tnr.rn n€ Vri] ^-^.:-^^- L-- J--^--,lfu-]l'llgll gl lhe house due-to.snowplgwjng. Thl To;n ;i-v;ii-.ng.l=n";r-;'ir'inioni.o !!:-lptli:l!t'!hlt snow from^plowins wit.t,be-pushil i;i; ir,"'pi"r.iiii';;;;;;front of the house. The ncposal
I
I
I
4
ct --s
v.b ra
2
9 t--
6 e
c
It)v'd-
$_
I 4
.L
D I 4
-o
)
:
I
o tl)3 \g
$F <F
v$s
ul cl-
vl
}J
ul
w ti
I qr-I 2 5 3-i1
3 .J a
a.I
Gt-
4 6 I
-J
t
tr,rlff
ttY'i
-r'J-a \)-! (J < t---\til |'-
q
I
(
T-J-;^W
-*<{=>
.:])f\
\-7-'r\.\-::/.=4
I
I
i ,o"?t s --N-..a1 ---*l'3 l-
\;
,\o \,-
l^
t.r9 n_ ..6
RA i6 -e.
..o', o,\
\,ro', ol
ti s
..,. _ _\ __r taQl
.i
$l ..)
..'Y \,r) tJ
R t .{
o b
\\
t_
{il-\t.
Vl
s
{r nl
.i. li I-FJ It
J .. I
t\
l.! )
i;
q
o a
o t
S,\|
tt \'\rl\
v lu ,l
ff-\-:._ll RI rJl \:q<,
F.r raI
.' | :g
-rlll rq:\--r l\lq(:'rl r>io
( Y s "';E2/6Ts t o
. \t f-!(:\X\\q itN\u:{i
T: IS
$i;r
Tr;$-'-'*n"'-'"
/r ,1 1--l I
--- .+r-.rr .. :---i-T-7--'-: -'-l/r-'l-=.--" --
lil*:
R$$
-+-----a---,zl : I
-1T"4 1
=-l--]_--{--J ''+:i.-l--i--*,{
'f'fiJ-; ',ll'i
$''{.
,-' ] ir\
^-; tt.l b'"\\<, f,) \.{ \
o, k i{.s g"-*j-ii..
x k;i\iiIiul if --rl--v.z
_|t_--__
tlt h9-rt
iJ\A':-c:.f=
r $;i $ox itii r i* :H is i :
h3,l t
I
i
i
I .-{ a
'u l u,t\l rl \al rl '--$, I
vl ql il f.r -l
,,!*--J
{\\\
l...v--\\
t..h
9;o)
I
f!
cO
:F .v|
{..
\
\J b
t t-a,l
----{- -'-. l-,&o-,q l,
:j t +,;l
I l+r;.r.lrl;f
idi:+{
-?1-- -- -tl
lF - ---: -' ll------.q(
p
a
N
\
\
\
r}.
\l s
=a
s
:-c l\a to t\:\l9 JL
,,\9
*T
ca
.,i
..5\
\
t\
l o
rl s
.8
Ee
\
I
1
\
r lrrf
(\
\
Y
N
u)
q {0 Ir
{
\{
\
c
{{
\
-l \s \v
0
$
q":.
\\q \\a
\
a q.
\
R
l-.
ta
F
F
n)
ca
qt
.J .r 't \t>o0
ja
\a !;h
r.U .il
-lO 'nu \\r
Szt o)
\
o a q(
--l
E
\\
d
( --*^:\g .v"{
i
I -l
i rJl zl l\l rtl xl \l t+l .l #t
-zb?',ll - ---l*T
\t K .)\ .-
: '.i'
\,
't)/:,v-
rr l*.-
,,q8l . ,"I.,1
i !'| 'u iA)ri
,'l 15
,rtf i ?
l-l 'rl v
;'- i Y )
. lt
.i ; <'r
'lio
1-F-
i
I
I
I
t'
I
I
';;rC.!7a 8'
{
..1 \tt
\l
s
\e(
\!
v
l,
+- \.-€
*:tX rrt 9 < td"
3 is$
X i:i -tr+f: ?
) uFs
ixstp) ,
srslAV
:g)
\
o s \{-
d
2 -+
U
q)
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-,*--,.|*-rl crl
ql --: - Fi--r -il
ri
I
--l
-.ot
a \q \
q {
i..
-r Fi
+I -r, (rl
,,a"70
tto'tZl tP-17/
ANO97 r/g
asJi D't 2q I i | 'c'o.e/ ,o srlr/v z ?' z
i$ ll w ^ ,i1 r \) -ii$l i ? {l I rs\Irl o I *=j $i : ri ill rl i; r:r. T'; jl i:ifrriY ;lst {- 't_Lii.liii t -,lJ:.-rr-'J-"'lii;a/ *o o
aoao eN/o/7s'nnrv-[ tooo 9N/otzs 'wntv it'1
; I tf)----{i:'{e -i ---?-.,77',te tt '
N,7,te oaaaTs -+i *3i!:!2 1:!?12-
:
a
rl
I tf
ul {q
u rl
q
'lr $\.tt\
t,.\-]\
l-.\ri ,s-l't o\
Sc)
' l-'\\)
..k
-v l.
cfl (4
_-.-J
:l
*flp
t''F
dt
I
I
I
I
I
i
c v
\4 tt
--o
-o
+
..tE
o
r(|
3B
o')l-i-.
-.1
Ul
=o
I
+
?
rq
-{
a_
q(
o
o
--.l
\
a
?
o
\)
\
b
-o
o t
b
d
n
I
Ir
:
?;:
Y \lo q
\q*
u!
l-\
"-- |,
vu
:-sl c-
(\r
o
rfl
q {s \
{
€
\9
s-
N
k
\s\
o
I t N
a | ' lr,,y ri-u r---r---r-z-o=-ffi-r'i77' p'7 -:,$
L.J _\
a (l
e(\
\
-J
F t
l(
(.1
tl o
a rr qt
{
iF T
\-\o
rl)s
u
o
n
$=e
,., $=*
'..r-! f
Fa
!,*
'tl
b:-v<
il-.r
.xN \\l rl
l.
$\t{
-:
\l
F
v,iI
\0 I
tl
1-
\{\x \
t-
\'
*J
I
aJ
oo
€.>
FilS-:o1s 81ii f .o
._"f-.+4+Ii ;
t\)
Q.-oi .-t \._-€--._;.
. -'l C, ^_6u1i \t:
i l| -'l - :, i, (t-. --tl 3 :'!F I r|
\+i -.:l ll s, t, aNtT/ j2 aSJoTcl
_. af l .i__ ----J -.-je t{ \rl _,,L,n ^a,'Jl-o '' at'"to n'',:'+,
"gr | ,,trito' I
"i/1,r
i$ d lo r:j I ...- '9 I to = i a ii,*.ovl S 6
-l \ _"i.j a lli
's ij+
-i_l--lrl'
ulYY V'z to -)
?.Q:L
" lll
'"'o.9/ A s
t(i $
ao 70;ii' ( lit cK
Lega I
0v.,ner
Zone District
Lot Size
Hei 9ht
Total GRFA
Primary GRFA
Proposed
.(Ft-ltlttt
fw&Lot,S
Descri ti on:
oo
for
SFR, R, R P/S TOIIE D]STRICTS
er oct l
Archi tect
Proposed Use
Fil in9
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks:
Front
)'l 0es
Rear
llater Course
?0'
l5'
15'
(30) (s0)
Site Coverage
Landscapi ng
Parll i ng
Credi ts:
Garage
J- + );n(rrry
l'lechan i cal
Ai rl ock
(so)(1oo)
(2s) (so)
Storage
So] ar Heat
5 tora ge
Drive: 5l ope perr,ri ti.ed
Env i ronmen',-a I /Ha za rds :
(4oo)
S'l ope Actua'l
Ava'l a nche
F'lood Plain
Sl ope
I hy
by_
Co;;en t s :
fvrau nrd,2
Zoning: A,c?roved/Disepproved Da te:
Mr. Peter Pattenr Jr.Acting Director Community Development
Town of VaiI
75 So Frontage Road Vai1. Colorado 8I657
Dear Mr.Patten,
\Ve are havi ng a
0ctober 8 , 1984
with the contractor and job at 756 Forest Road,his wor
number
doing a
of problems
remodeling
for Mr
Several time,s we have had to ask the contractor and his
workers to move their vehicles out of our parking area. We
have talked to the owner and explained our problem and he
has said the contractor has been notified.
For some reason the contractor (who I have not been abLe
to obtain the name of due to your offices being cfosed todayt
and my leaving town today, will have to be gotten from your
records) seems to think. he has the automatic privledge of
tresspassing on our property any time he feels like it and
to what ever extent he pleases.
Not only have we had various vehicles parked on our
private (and posted) parking area, front end-1oaders, dump
trucks and other extremely heavy vehicles have been driving
and parking on the cement parking area. Needfess to say
the concrete is not stressed for these types of foads.
0ur property narrowly escaped damage when they were blastingt
my vintage l95l chevrolet was nearly hit by the shower of
rocks that resulted from one of the blasts, and then to
top this off the man that did the blasting proceeded to take
the rocks that blew into the street and toss them into my
yard and guarden.
Today I once again told them to move their vehichles'
and recieved nothing but a barage of Ianguage from the
contractor. He also informed me I was making his life difficult,
I told him there would be no problem if he would keep off
our property, at this point he informed me that if my car
was parked (ln our parking area) and was in the way of his
construction equipment he would teLl them to hit it. This
I consider a real threat to me and my property.
I think at this point a bond should be secured form the
contractor at his expense to cover any damage that he shouli
render on ours or other neighboring property. Also please
contact this contractor and tell him that he is to provide fcl
his own parking of construction vehicles some place else other
than our parking a rea, and on Forest Rodd ' which is a no
parking street
Unfortunately both my husband and I are l-eaving town for a
week, and I must say I fear for the safety of our property at
the hands of this lnsulant indlvidual. I am a.fraid I must
ask that you see that this matter is resolved and our property :
protectedl,even if thls means asking the Va11 PoIice to patrol
the area.
.
,.1 ,
hb44*ee'/\J
Mrs. Thomas Jacobson
765 F.of est Road
Vail, Colorado 8I657
Slncerely,
cc: CFJ Mr. Emmet Stephenson
% Stephenson & Co
899 Logan Denver, Colorado 80201
\ ':?2
-9-\\)s"
f\
i_;;.\i-a (=x
'-?
"o -,v €
q
0
i
Cl
rl
,{l
n
.l
',1 r ,\
$:
i'', o t)Q
I
({)
ti
$i
i. it
IY \r il > t..
h a {
*
\t
:\\
I o \)
.lt -.t
\tq
dg
iai
,.o -, ol ,,o', ol
i!
I
t
$\
q q
g
a \
T
\\\
Fl t
$(r b
Q
t".
1A
I
-i rq
i-\b i*F*q it r{
!$:
i. I
..t$.
l_rG *i l-
r-..i I o(i h,oi k
Hf
{$tr
$*
\\\s
i
o
l-\a I
\()\\t q-\\(.\\
t\
L,
---s (J
,.e ,Q*{.N.
s ,L,
a ((cJ IR '.$t
v,
,Ye7
I
q
\l (\d I
I
I
I
I
I \(
,Q
a
\
5
il \
(r..
rX4
18. -r
l{!l.\ \l
Tr,tl:i
lsr
F,*
i.,
S(
i
\
5
f,
I
*o
\t a
$\
u)
)
r.l \
F(\i
l.;-.t|
b q
h.'h
{
uato)t:y
-2O AD -4'z V?
rl
,\,-
l, ,9 i?
N o
ro
I \
A(
A(\a.j
\i'ott q.
.\ -1 +\r
9 .l it
v>00 !*\:
t-ta ic -. I jo
fiy
a(, !'
\
o
o
a(
.-l -\
E
\
\
!1ao.)lr:,
''"e\/ isi lt.gr ;\ S ile.,Jt---1 i-li :}oXSi 'r'i$ iil$: i i'l it R[rl:i .i *+S:;li 'ri i iGFi;:l ji r r .a u[,{i i '.ii *
|.r'.,ll
I '; ^irielzi+** ." '
i F:s;5appffif, '*
o"\
J-o _ltit
]
i J
I
a \v \:\{
l-
e "1
1
I
j
"t
\
F e \\t'
:q
|l
a $
tll \t
s
u
t"l
q \Sr s.\:i
i=c
*\."i o\.r!
0A
t l'.'- \)-\
.t\,v l'.cfl h
;0-,o,c u
0
,p-,t L
tP-tZI o- 7/llv IL.'
-' -. .- ---:'.' . . . rfi .r-rli '4 lll o.
ANo27 vs lli :' ill +fq llt .,'o . 1h./ r:-Q-.
.tN
=(,:\.tk s i.\bvl
0 I t
u \
a
x t
I
0
I x \
a
- -' :' -
- - -- :+ -;::=,-:E-{fl !- - -------r- --:- :. ; . --&:
Dtooo eN/o/7s'wnlV l'l UQoo 2NtolTs 't'/n'ty 'tr"t ,t (0
o
v
u
rrl
a
b
n
Ntrttg ozaoTs a-+.j 9Nt7t33 otdoTs
z ii lIs'lri q' v
tsJJl, eT : ll 'i'o.gr 6)su3:tvz =;a S
"S ll 3 3-;l
o
I
+: li lits=i{t -rr: I ,ii I u$: {l rr*s=iq [$ d - rt l-iii$iXl g] -{.u5 , -uii ll:oq J -:
.. f--i i l!'; \r l o
; ril ,-r -j-
c)u
?
q
\
a_
\o
o
\t
\
a
?
o
\
<i-
ru6
q tt
I {'r
o
I ':c
N
3
\J
!f >Q
\
ti tJ \
s F vl
a)
-+q
=
.r
()
a
le
*s-<l (\a q-rl
E
a tl ((\
\
.J
l-I \
U
!o
s
2Ct 0\
$b
*i;u
-'"-'S d
J.- .l -l\l \,// a--
b l'a'o.
SA
\*
B%
rO r
q
..1
s .\
!A
oo
\9
I s
\
cJ q
\'I
q
-l t4
t(|
A v
_\r o
rfl
a F
v)
t,<
F
9t \{\x
lll
qr
()
q)
t-\I
-J
gs:niP .,o',s ,t1i i .o.o
eNt 7/ 12 o34o7s
ql
\l
'(t
s,Cr
a
lrt
'o'o,,2/ 6) sYrJ.l
-rI <{a(\i1 .oQ
ii
.h$
Sl r'si
t*\
,i$
o {
o
:a
0q
$
i v
$.1
\.1
o q
o
\l
r0
fJtla ?'"2
lpe\ol ..[t
q
o q
ro
a
{
+
c\r
sr
tl
-o
vl
-*:-
o
q
$l E
i'.t
'e'o.g/ A s
J
v
A
d-tl-
ll
J t
s-$l-
a
o
o
o
';;d (,
---nn (+I
\-\\
-..*-==J f"
5-=-r* ffi F.-i P€"<___t E frry.Y
sl-G
H 2 a,:?, ;.j
: \fi,
,P " 63p
ul
5 bt-4 \r
h
2 a r
g
UJ
h-
t-r IJI
z ,ii I o
=\zi Qs u$
ID e-{!u4
..h- d
gQl
^ts^.-\,l{/
,\
\I..
I
k+
+ ,"'.,-1 f
"r. tf'
'\l+t \/ll'
'. ,
I .-l-- _,t
tr.". a
t=--::'
-J,, ?
IF
Y
i' ilt t L 'rr t-rr" L+Hll=i:k
1",-')d,
.n
GT h
.i^
5 .-t
s -s
<- ('ps
C>-r S
-t r--.
iu \r
' v -,F'I
{
'\l^
tl o
.-.-,
a-.\
ril \r
3_.\t-
h
2 o ?
I
r,$
L
&2
:
$l 3 o
2t (\i
/I.$l 2-u
L$
,f$
ft H
I aq
(
G
a j a 1
JL
a
a
Ql-rO-
o
e,
\
i
rd
U'3r o-*u
-t\
6..st o -\.2
9ul
d-d rt
-l
I 2 _l
o
UI
s-N.4 \s-
t-
z
9 T
I
ul
7
s o (n
)
$
z v
3
1}
n
rDNM.
o
Planning and
Communi tY
A request for side and
and to enclose an area
6th FiI ing, 756 Forest
o
En vi ronmental Commission
Development Department
t 9B4
oo
DATE: August 8'
SUBJ ECT :front setback variances to construct a garage
underneath a deck on Lot .l2, Block l, Vail Village
Road. App'l icant: Richard Heller
PROPOSAL DISCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting front and side setback variances in order to construct
one sing)e car garage on the east s'ide of the property and to add an addr'tion to the
existing house. Because almost half of the existing house is located in the front
se'uback, a vari ance is required for both the addition and for the garage. The prooosed
garage extends approximately 1l feet jnto the side setback and'l 2 feet into the front setback. The new addition is approximately l3 feet into the front setback. In addition,
a solariurn hal'lway will be added onto the south side of the building and a new decL will connect with an ex_isting deck in the front of the building creating a deck ar"ound
the entire house that also connects onto walkways leading to another rear deck. The balcor:on the front side of the house would extend jnto the setback beyond the required a:rount.
Presently, the balcony is 2 feet from the property 1ine. Given the location of the
existing house, the front and side setback variances are needed for the garage and
a front setback for the proposed addjtjon and deck.
Two parking spaces are needed to meet the unit's parking requirement. One space is
provided by the ner,r garage. The second space (previously existing) is located in front of the new garage. The appljcant js also requesting to locate a park'i ng area in front of the existinghouse in the public right-of-way. The applicant js reques'uing
the additional parking to solve a chronic prob'l em of people parking on the street.
The parking area is not needed to meet a parking requirement. Th'i s parking area \ras previously approved the Design Review Board in September 1977. The approval has since expired. The Town of Vai'l Engineer has approved with conditions the location of the
unenc'losed parking area. The applicant has agreed to rework the north boundary drainage
system and to install a culvert at his expense on his property. The applicant has
also agreed not to remonstrate aga'inst the Town of Vail if snow is diverted onto his parking area in front of the house by Town of Vai'l snowplows.
GRFA FIGURES:
Primary/Secondary zon i ng
Site area: 45,500 square feet
A'l 'lowed GRFA: 6,025 square feet
Existing GRFA:565.5 sq ft
870.0 sq ft
1435.5 sq ft
First Floor
Second Floor
Tota'l Exi sti ng GRFA
oo oo
F o )
+,(u
t qro (dc=c .-qJo
(u 'ro >.r CttLO.tJ .gol-('
l€o=o (5 rtl'r r
I
I
I
I
tl
3
E>oo >L
t- +,
.dL
\
L
('
6=
q, (J
L lo>
(J
L
x
!
x
o
.tl
cJ
.I'()
U7
c,E O,.-,6 -O L (6P aa
4il.59'
ct
2
-U u,,-z
-t :9
9;ori z H:
Ho
UJ 2
=7
6/u)(l-a
o
o
(r J
lr.l
F c-oor z-! *b
OJ F -,.o 30 J H=uJy ('F
GG <o JG z
. lr,
ol 3
F
a
trj
o
i!
_NO o .-:
9
oo OO ner rer -c 6/c/du
Proposed construction:
Addi tion
Garage
Garage Storage
So'l ari un Ha'l i rvay
pius existing GRFA
Total
Garage credit
Sfnr;na rrod i t
297 sq ft
300 sq ft
77 s9 ft
i28 sq ft
'1435. 5 sq ft
2237.5 sq ft
- 300 - 77
Total GRFA with addition .l860.5 sq ft
Parking requirement: 2 spaces
CRITERiA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Find tion 1Q.62.060 ol lhe Municipal Codg' :
' = : :: ; ; :I :^ l-
Department ot qPq,*rn
The relationship of the requested varjance to other ex'i sting or potential uses ar'C
@
tt" *t*1 trt.*r rf the one-car garage in the front and sjde setbacks are beinc
mjnimized by designing the structure so that it is constructed at street'l evel iito
the hil'lsidL. Tha stiucture wi'll be earth-sheltered. Landscaping w'i1l also be..Cded
on top of the garage to minimjze some of the impacts of the.structure. lhe a0o1--1on
that is located beneath the present open deck should have minimal impacts on the
existing structures in the vicjnity, as it is merely an infi11 project.
The park.ing area in front of the house should alleviate the problem 9l-!llt..Pu:lins
on tiie str6et. Vail Assocjates uses Forest Road for their snow cat access up tne
Ski mountain. The design would move parked cars away from Forest Road alleviati:9..'
the existing part<ing-pr6U'l em. Presently, 3 unpaved -parking areas and two paved :arking
areas exist in the neighborhood that are similar to the proposed parking. Publi:
Works department also feels that the parking area would make it easier for them:c
plow Forest Road. The applicant proposes to pave and'l andscape the parking. Th:
overall impact of the parking will be minimal and will help to solve a parking
prob'lem.
The deqree to which relief frqm the strict or literal jnterpretation an! enforce-ent
ffitilj-oilr-ellej$el-!ffiitle"ithout
grant of special privileqe.
The existing house was built prior to the existing setback requirements. Becaus:
of the locaiion of the house in the front setback, (approximately 13 ft into the
front 20 foot setback), parking would have to be located on either the southtles:
corner or rear side oi the house in order to be out of the setback area. Due tc
the diff.icult'l ocation of the existing house' staff feels that jn order to achie,e
compatibi'l .i ty among sites, it would not be a grant of special priv'i lege to al1oi''
the'garage a-nO aOOition to be located in the front and side setbacks.
oo OOrler.r- B/B/t]4
To allow the parkinE area in the public right-of-way vrould also not be a grant of
special pri vi1ege, as the existing_house is located in such a way that the required
size parking spaces could not be placed jn front of the house. The distance from
the house to the prc;erty ljne is approximately 8 feet t. The required length for
a parking space is 19 feet, and the wjdth is 9 feet.
Because of these harCships which exist and the fact that s'imilar variances have been
granted in the area, the staff feels that the granting of th'i s variance request will
not constitute a special privilege.
The proposal
space wit.hin in the public
the improved
a reasonable
project will
tvili improve the parking situation for this site[y locat.i ng one parking an enclosed structure on the owner's property. T-he parkin! area located
.right-of-way has been approved by the Tbwn -eng'i neer. It is felt that drainage, additional culvert, and remova'l of cirs off the street is trade-off for allowing the parking in the public right-of-rvay. The 'impact transportation and traffic .i n a posjtive way]
RELATED POLICIES IN VAIL'S COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN
This-proposal is relaied to policy-No. 2 under the Cornmunity Design section of the community Act'ion.P1an. The policy states that upgradin-g and iemodeling of structures and site iriiprovements should be encouraged. Staif feels that tie remodeling and additional garage will be an improv6ment to this projeca: - -
Such other factors and cri ter.i a the commission deems I icable to the roposec var't ance.
FI ND I NGS
make the fol.l owino f.i ndinqs before 9ran! r nq a variance:
I!:l-!!:^ntlnt]19 of the varjance will not constitute a srant.of special priv.ile3e inconsistert with the limitations on other properties clissif.ied in the sane d.i srr;ct.
Illi.lh" 'o.anting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,salety' or irelfare, or ;aterially injurious to properties or irp.bueoent;-;;-;;.vicinitv.
The effect of the req ues ted varlance on
transDortation and traffi c f ac'i l i ti es,
and air, distrjbution of opul a ti on ,faci I ities and ufiTi ties
o
oo
Tha'u the variance is warranted fclr one
The strict or litera'l interpretation
rrould result in practical difficulty
with the object'ives of this tjtle.
There are exceptions or extraordinary
the site of the variance that do not
same zone.
HerOO B/B/84
or more of the following reasons:
and enforcement of the specified regulation
or unnecessary physical hardsh jp incons isier,'r.
circunstances or conditions appl icable to
apply general 1y to other properties in the
The strict or literal interpretatjon and enforcement of the specified regulation
Vou'l d deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the ob/ners of other proper--ies
in the same ciistrict.
s r4iI__8!!!I{E{qAU!r!.
The staff recommends approval of the front and side setback variances for the new garage' front setback variance for the addition and_deck. The applicant has agreed to handle all drainage problems and to install a atlva;t-on'nrs property. rne aiiji-cant has^also agreed not to remonstrate against 9ny.no* ulcumutating in the parkir3 area in front of the house due_to snovipiowing. Th; Town of Vail engineer has infor:,ed the applicant that snow from-plowing wil.l be pushed jnto the parkin! area in front of the house. The staff recommends approval of the pio'posii 6eiarie'ir,e"u are extraordinary circumstances on this site that do not aiply generatty io oiirer properties in the same zone.
C
c \)-
l-rl
s_rf
oo oo
\\\t y
\)
t{ct-
Y]
I
UJ
u I
t
=J
a
5 6-
d .J:--
.u ,rl3
;-I Y
\t'.'-
o
I
o
lr)a
>g
str
'4)-
vd
-Q
=g
b .'t
2
9 v-
6 c 4
c
u)
{l
I 4
IU llL
s
x U 4
o
t{
>J
-:(,/rSr
t))
This procedure
The application
A.NAI{E OF APPLICANT
ADDRESS
Application
APPLICATION FORM FOR A VARIA}ICE
is required for any project
will not be accepted until
requesting a Variance.
t Date
i: tF,".E-iPrnitred'
tJ+l./-,*
I.
B. NAME oF AppLrcANr,. *"/{iJn*rArrv'
ADDRESS
c.J'IAME 0F O|{NER (t or print)
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
D.IOCATTON OF PROPOSAI
n^oNu4lt" l1l4
rcNE, 4.U-Zlq1
enoury{l! Znq
ADDRESS
r.,EGAl DEscRrprroN tot_llalock___-j_
F.
E.FEE.
A list of the nanes subject property and
Maria Theresa Gomez,'o/^ (1arA ann c D A t r.r!.25I Crandon Blvd. !lIO17
"Key Blseayne, FI. 13149
Cynthia Fowl-er Jaeobson
Box 5J8 va11, Colo. 8I658
Robert D and Marie M Working
50f Mount Evans Rd.
Golden, Co1o.8040I
of owners of all ptoperty their mail ing addresses.
apprication f+r a variance page 2
II. four (4) copies of the following information:
A' A statement of the precise_nature of the.variance reguested,the resulation invoi""al-I"a tne-prlJtii"i"iirrrcurry or',.rrir,."essary phvsicar hardship i"i""!rli.rrt wilrr trre-orjectives of this titre that would resuli il;, ;;ict.or-iit.ii-iii.rpretarion and, enforce_nent of the specifiea rejuiation.
B' '' A site plan showing all^ex:"lilg and proposed features on the site' and on ag:oininJ'sfils..ir_nec6ssaryl-fertinent to the variance requested, includins iite boundarie", r"ioti.d setbacks, luii.aing l::::'""" ana rreign;";-;;p;;'ipi'v-iil niilii.t reatures and simi.rar
C. Such additionat materiat^::_ll"_lolirg administraror rnay pre_scribe or the applicani rnav- surrnit p"rtir,Errr to ttre applicaiion.
IfI. Time requirements
The planning and Environmentar commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondavs-of each *""Lrir"'a" "ppji.itil""iitn rhe necessary accom-3?""ri:t Hlifi:t must be "'u'ittll-r-;--;":i. piio,-'ti-ifrl'i"t"
-
^NELSON KING . P.O, BOX 3003 . VAIL, COLO, 81658 . 303/476-1714
7 /16 /84
-
REQIIEST T'OP. VARIANCE:/ )o '.'oresr Ha.
In the course of excavation to add a previously apDroved parking area along the front of this lot adjoining Forest :, | - . -^-:\ . .RC. (aporoved 1979), it is our request to be allowe'i to also excavate along the east side of the 1ot adjolning the residence. In what is now a lanriscaoed earih mound.,
v.,e propose to construct at street level a one-car gan.ag,e.
The earth wouLC then be replaced over the shell to insu-late and conceal the garaqe, and the landscaniniT renlaced.
Forest Fd. is a major VA access road to the mountain and off-street parkine is now limited to tr+o sDaces. These
improve:rents wiLl not only allow the owners and their guests adeo-uate parkinq, but a1 so allow leaving a vehicle yea-r-round in a nrotected sDace. '"^Jhat ruork is necessary to install a cufvert anC rework the north boundarv Crain-aee system will be unrlertaken at the oio'ners excense.
Arlditionallv, vre request enclosing the first floor covered
deek area for the increaser'l livlng sDace demande.i by the
new owners use reo_uirements; and wrar:rring the bulk of the
second fl oor in Ceckinq. The second floor is the main high-use nortion or the unit so the Cecking will increase not only the fair rn'eather entertainnnent area but al_so
maximize the viel corridois. srom the baek of the unit,by extenCing two bridee ,rralkrn,ays, a secluded deck ean be constructed in and around existine trees on the t-ear bank for even more entertainment soace.
coincide with a eomplete exterior
and lot; moss rock facing on the iirst
eomnlete relandscaning, structural
The-ee aCditions r+i11
upgrade of the unlt f1oor, 1og terracing,detailinq.
lo
^NELSON K|NG . P.O. BOX 3003 . VAIL COLO. 81658 . 303/476-1714
7 /16/84
REQIIESI tr'OR VARIANCE:755 tr'orest Rd.
In the course of excavation to add a previously apDroved parking area along the front of this 1ot adjoining lorest Rd. (aipron"a f97t), lt is our request to b6 alloierl to also excavate along the east side of the 1ot adjoining the residence. fn what is now a landscar:ed earth mound,
v.'e propose to construct at street 1evel a one-car garage.
The earth woul-d then be replaeed over the shell to insu-late and conceal the garage, and the landscapinE replaced.
Forest Rd. is a major V.4 access road to the mountain and off-street parking is now limited to two sDaces. These
improvements will not only allow the owners and their guests adequate parking, but also allow leaving a vehicle year-round in a proteeted space. htrat work is necessary to 1nstall a culvert and rework the north bound.arv Crain-
aqe system will be undertaken at the owners exDense.
Additionally, we reouest enelosing the first floor covered deck area for the increased living sDace demanded by the
new owners use requiTements; and wrapping the bulk of the
second floor in decking. The second floor is the main high-use nortion of the unit so the decking will i-ncrease not only the fair weather entertainment area but also
maximize the view corridors. From the back of the unit,by extendi-ng two bridge rvalkrvays, a secluded deck can be constructed 1n and around existing trees on the rear bank for even more entertainrnent sDace.
These additlons wi-11 eoincide
upg"ade- of the unit and 1ot;fl oor, 1og terracing, comolete
detai l ins.
with a complete exterior
moss roek facing on the first
relandscaning, struetural
,"1
75.south trontage ,d.
varl, colorado g 1657
(303) 475-7000
Rosenary Hel l er 756 Forest Road Vail, Colorado gl657
Dear Ms Hel 1er:
C. Landscaping
A:" : i;::" :i;f of
,'ror"ili :;";" :f ,: | "
D. Site Coveragg
B. Allowed. Square Feet
(See attach"a a
=-
efinition of gross r
ff1"1j:::l#:]:" "ff
residential rloor area or GRFA)
square feet alt:
d in the prinary residence--3,615
rwed in the secondary residenc e__2,4I0 These are the naxirru oe considered your ,,T^11]?""a. square foc
another di; ; ili ; m::;i;"i:*m j*l H, li ". ;ff ::"ff :, 1",
department of community development
January ZS, lgg2
Re: iil'i;:Tl:j'i:t:,.i'viils"
6th
.,l:j^:l.yto be landscaped.ranoscaping.
The purpose of this
:;frijfljji :i"i:::; i;::;i ;;"::.,;#5lo"olnil,":f,t::i:": governing addi,ional ffy#irfi i $iNn I ll r i:;in"r#,' +ili: iii_ i ni ::T, r;:::r ; " :" ; I
o#
:lif:i:f ::#q:j"ffi:*i*tr*ri;'; j."*j$Titi:i=:iifuif i}:iff :.,li:fi;*{i!ii:iiiJ*Tr:Tifr*:$*"riri;:ti**:t*i:';iJ":; *i':i rf ;; l ; ;tSJ t .3;ffi ftfr "iit""l:-lj i;:fu** I#;#t i rind copies;f ;ii';;;."15.1"ir'lJlii"ii:-.:"^:-;",,",^;;;.:;J::."';;""";
I_ Tha D_:*-
__ -^ rv6ur.lcrons attached to this letteL.r' ii" #:lnlt"::lu"', zone District
H :1gg3rngffi:j::ss on your lot, a ,prin'.'y,, residence and a,seconaary,i"i"ll;;:l:
t^i"l:l:l ot !,82! seuare feet of th see section "Ei ot the h;rzard,"r"r"irlll.nay be covered by buildings.
E. Off Street parking
A total of s^-_
0HI| 0
Project Name:
Proiect Description: -
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
6 -;083?
Legal Description: Lot l?- , Block
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
t J'S-'/,t /.',
ai,"
Design Revlew Board
--7- "< - -/€t
DISAPPROVAL
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
Adm in istrator Chief Building Official
Date:
r'^r
ffR.e4 '{.Pititl Ct: W \f-\ ,ft
/v,
1 q.4
.*, \3
6i/, l:\\\
JLJ
aJ', ,
2 g r ?
s u)
tr
UI .<
:
i :i
Ar
tr-D
I J rl sl
I
\!
rJri .42 .
.' ,q
1 'turn-
---d-ffi
\]
.', l ilt t- -'
.J f'.,(j
:
)
l
i 7l rFi at l>4
lJ.l
.4.
u),
i
\l
FT
-\,\I/
-rl
L uI
ug-
J n,r;
I
I
i
I
I
3
=_*.)ElZ ,IY
-
o
":
ll
\s
d J
n
,is'dBlitii
I
-iF%'.{!
l
I riq
ffi
i'- I -tt
l-!.,
o
o
\
l
I
2
9
6
D 4
n
u)
$-
$_
I 4
+
o
ts 4 E o
l
cJ-..
o
J tl-
hr'
1l
t
-f
/,
I
I
'l
l1
l1
rl
l1
lg
Ir
rl
ll
tl
rrl cl-5
$
9
u)
rL
lrl 6
I sf-
B 2 5 5
3 -)4 a t.J
s-
3
o
o
-rH
bs ys
sil
I,n
I
J
,l
'i* dfr
$#\t-c q]< t**,i_rt lb 4 |rl
I
h-z
J
.J t
;-o
,d
^-,
--
*t
I I
)
t;I
rt t
,
I
''\
{}
o
":
t
\\t
${
grl
t
(6,