Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIONS RIDGE FILING 2 LOT G4 OVERLOOK COMMON LEGAL_Part4.pdf• • Plaintiff's meeting with the County Commissioners and no re- sponse having been received from said County Commissioners, Plaintiff employed the serv i c es of another architect to pre~ pare the documentat io n required for submission o f ar, appli- cation for the excavation buildin g permit. Plaintiff pre- pared the application and submitted it to Planning and Build- ing Department on Noven ;ber 11, 1977. On Noven ;ber 28, 1977~ the Department responded to the application by letter, the terms of which indicated noncompliance with certain nuildin~ Resolution requirements as well as noncompliance with the Zoning Resolution, but did not sp e cifically and directly deny Plaintiff's applicatio n fo~ building permit. (15) Plaintiff introduced extensive evidence to sh ow that for a period of at l east two years from and after the adop- tion of th e County ~oning Resolution i n 1974, that the Eagle County government and its various departments had treated pre- existing plats as subject to the Eagle County Subdivision Reg- ul <.tl.ion ~; a11cl not. l:lw Znninq f~t'~;o lul:i o n ;1~-: l.'X I t:L'~;sly pr·ov.ided i) tmd er the exemption cl a us e of Lhe Zo n i nq HcsoluUon. 'l'hcr.c wus no evide nc e to s how that the Eagle County govern m ent , its bc•ards or d epa rtments, h ad ever. applied the abandonment clause of the L.aglc Cou nt y Zoning Resol u tio n to terminate rights existing und er any pt:"eexisti.nq plats until they undc :rt.ook to do so in th e c.Jsc of thE ~ Plaintiff's applicat i on. (16) The Def e nd ant Co unty cont e nd e d t hat th e plat had been a b a ndon e d pursuant to Section 8 .06 of the zoning Resolution which provided among other things tha~ wh e never a nonconforming u se had been abandoned for a p e riod of one year , f utur e u sc of the l and s hall b e i n co n fo rmit y with all applicable previsions of the -(-, - • • Zoning Resolution. Th e question then arose as to whether or not a particular pJ .at could be d eemed abandoned as under the noncon- forming use abandonment provision. Thi .s Court finds that Section 8.06 is meant to apply to nonconforming uses and not to plats which hav e been previously ap p rov e d which exceeded, according to their approval, subs eq uent density regulations pursuant to zoning. The Court finds that had th .e l egis lativ e body , th e County Comr ·is.- sioners in this case~ intended to put a time limit on th e use of prior approved plats that th ey could have done so; and having failed to do so, must have.intended not to do so. Additionally, testimony from various witn e sses, including Mr. Hub er t W e inshienk, i ndicated that th e l egis l ative history of the act was to the con- trary, that previously ap p rov ed p lats would be ex e mpted from use and densi~y restrictions at the time of the adoption of th e zon- ing r egulatio n. Th e evi d e nc e of legi .slative history was uncon~ trov erted . {17) Th e Cou rt not e s that any rig h ts that Plaintiff m ay hav e acquired pursuant to the pre lim inary plat apprcval of the <) "H om e st ake IV" project p rob ab l y have been l ost purEuant to pre- vision s of Sectio n 3.10 of tt .e Subdivision Regulaticns wh erei n it i s provided t h at co n ditional approva l of a prp l imi n ary subr divi .slon plu n s h all be v .-ll i .d ror ~ pcr.ior': not: t o f'XC(~I'd lhr cc ye.:1rs , unless un exten s ion of Li .m e i s qri..lnll~d . 'l'tl{~ cv i<.l t •n ce failed to disclose a n y extension of tim e , a n d t h e facts are such t h at , it's ohvio u s t h at n o f ur t h e r ilct i on could b e taken on the =oint deve lopm ent: plan whil e part of the prorcrt y wa s in the county and part of it was ~n t h e city. T h erefore , the Court finrls governmental authorization p u rsuan t to its abo r tive attempt to d o -7 - ·. • • e joint project with the owner of Lot A-9 of Lion's Ridge Sub- division No. 1. (18) The Court further finds ttat the Flaintiff ex- pendcd considerable time and mon ey developing his plans for his current application after his conversations with Mr. Michael Blair and Mr. Stephen Isom, who were agents of the county at that time; and that prior to that date , the evidence would indicate the zoning regulations had not been imposed as a limi- tation on previously approved subdivision plats wherein the den- sity exceeded that which would have otherwise be e n approved pur- suant to the zoning regulations . The Court finds that at all times during Plaintiff's ownership of th e Lot, from the time he acquired it in 1972, until he commenced this actio~, Plaintiff activ e ly sought commercial development of Lot G-4 in accordance with the covenanted use and platted density allowance. Plaintiff's failure to achieve his obj e ctive could not be att .ributed to in- activity on his part because during the period of his ownership, tllally f<H~l.01·~; o1dvc•t ·!·a·ly o~fft •C i t •d l'Oilt'nlllinitllll cfl'Vt'IOfllitl'nl in t J ·<· (t / Vai 1 a rca, including unf avorab le rna rke t conc1i t . ionf:, una v0 .i labi 1 i ty mar ket uncertainty . The evidence showed that th~ Plaintiff ex - pcnded or obligated h imself to expe nd prior t o the commencement of thi s acti.o _n the sum o f $l 02,'F>2 on acCJ ui!~i t i on or llti .s pro - perty and var..ious professional fees t o p lan i.t s d<!VC·l opmc~nt . Th(~ Court co ns iders t hi s to b e a sub st antial and s.i.qnificc.nt su m of m oney. (19) Th e Court finds , and th e architect s o t~stified, that app roximately o n e half o .f Lot G -4 is more than 30 7 . in s l ope , and approximately one half is l ess than 30% i n s lope. The Court -8 - • • notes thE: current county r eg uJ .ations provide that no structure ~--------~~~--~--~ can -be Bu1lt in an area that exceeds 30% in slope. Tl 1e architect I so testified, and this Court finds, that such an arbi .trary limita- I tion is unreasonable and unnecessary and not required to pre serve I I the public health, saf e ty and welfare. Th e architects testified and th e Court finds , that under pr o per soil and geological condi- tions that th e deve lo pment of property in excess of 30t slope can offer interesting and ex citing opportunities foE the us e of archi- tectural and e~gineering imagination; and while extra planning and expense may well be involved 1n developi~g such a prop e rty, that it could be very desirable from an aesth e tic and l and use standpoint. ~ . . . The Court notes that th1s property 1s located 1n the Colorado mo unta ins, not on the Kansas prairie, and the Cou~t consid ers an arbitrary. slope limitation without any other requirements involved to be arbitrary and capricious and unnecessary. L------- (20) ~he Court further finds that substantial sums of money were expended by the planners and d e velopers of the Lion's Ridge Subdivision No. 2. The e vid e nce indicated an excess of 0 $500,000 was e xpended on installation of roads, streets and util- ities, and that Plaintiff paid a portion of tho se costs through the purchase of h is property a nd the n ecessa ry tpx for the util- ity districts involved . CONCLUSIONS OF L~W (1) The le ga l effect of Section 4.0 2 .0G cf the Eagle Coun ty Zoning Rcsolutior1 i s p lainl y stated on i .ts fa ce . The pre - ex i sting plats, final or preliminary, are governed by t h e pro- visions of the subd iv isio n r egu lat ion und0r which they r ecei ved approval and not by r>rovisions of the Zon i .ng Resolut ion ut lea s t insof ar a s they relate h e l e gal effec t of Section -9 - • • 8.06 of the Eagle Coun ty Zo ning Resolution is al s o plainly stated on its face, and such clause is lim i ted in operation t.o abandon- ment of nonconforming uses as those are d efi n e d in thE : Resolution Section 2.02.62. Plats ar e not nonconforming uses under the terms and ~revisions of the Zoning Resolution . They are not subject to abandonment · within 'the meaning o f thE · abandonment clause 8.0€. Section 3.10 of the Eagle Count y Subdivision Regulations provid e s for the expirational plats which are condition&lly approved. The preliminary plat for ''Ho mestak e IV" w as con diti on a lly approved in that it was subject to a filing of a final condominium plat when the property was completed. T he condominiums n eve r w ere built, and, accordingly, no plat ~as eve r filed, a nd th e : Plaintiff lost whatever rights he may h a v e acquired pursuant: to that ap p rov61 by the lapse _of time. ( 2) Th e Defend a nt Board of Count y Comrr .issicn e rs by approving the density d e signated on Lion's Rid ge Subdivision No. 2 authorized the construct i on of 40 condom iniu m or a pa rtment unit~ on I,()t r.-4. 'l'hcr c af:t c r, t he arl()ption of thn Zonin cr R eso lu tio n () exempted such dcn s i .l y rl'qulat io r.s (rom t.lu ~ t.o ninq H vso lut:ion pur ·- suant to paragraph 4.02.0 6 as quoted abov e . Th erE after, Plaintiff , in reliance upon the apprcval of the pl a t , and eyen subsequently , i n r e l ia nce upon conversations with county pla nn i ng d i r e ctor and his assistant, expe n ded considerable . sums of m on e1· to dev e lop a r :lan for the ut ilizatio n of h i ~:; r.ot in confot-m ity wi l h l·l w d e n sity ap proved on the o t ~i.qin a l ~;ubdiv i s ion p l a t . 'l'll<.: c o un l y c.:lr:n o l , thereafter , change its mind with o ut adoptin 9 speci .fic r e g u latio ns or havinq a cutoff period on ex e mptions , and no s uch Ctitoff ge riod ha d been passed by the Board of County Co m missioner:s . ·rh e appli - cation of slope r es tric tio ns witho ut more specific e n 0i n eer in g , 10 - • • ' . • geological and hydrological study being present, is arbitrary an~ an unnecessary exercise of the po:. icc power without bene· fit to the public health, safety or welfare, and, th eref or e , is declared unen- forceable if those oth er conditions are met. (3) The Defendants are estopped to assert E2 .gle County Zoning Resolution against the development of Lot G-4, but that does not mean that the Plaintiff can ignore the Bui .lding Resolu- tions which were subsequently adopted and do relate to public hEalth, safety and welfare, subject to the above paragraph. (4) Additionally , the Defendants are estopped to reise the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies in this case, becaus e when the Plaintiff sought definition of thE:ir rules and regulations, they fail ed to act and subsequently issued to him a lett er which was neith er an approval or denial of his application. (5) Plaintiff presented his cl aim to the Boare of County Comrr.issioners and in doing so staisfied the requJrement.s of C.R.S. 1973 Section 30-25~10,. but this Court specifically deter- min es that that statute wa s not intended to cover this type of l) case. It is there f ore Ordered th a t u p on t h e Pl .aintiff's com- pliance with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code governinq permits for grading and excavati..o n~ t h z ,t th e Dt ·!fendar:ts shall issue to the .Plaintiff a building permit p ursuan t to the p lans presented by him und er hi s application wh ic h was ~xh j .bit 29 in this case , the application which was made and submitted to th e Building Department on November 11, 1977. DONE and signed in chamber this 17t ~ day of October, 1980. BY TilE COURT : •. -· ll - ,-------- .... I' • • CERTI FT CAT!·: OF ~1/\ II.. lNG I hereby certify that on this date I have mailed one copy of the attached Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and J udgment to the following: S tewn r t H. Brovm Attorney at Law 210 Lazier Arcade Building Vail, Colorado 81657 Hugh R. Warder Attorney at L<"~w P . 0. Box 6 98 Glenwood Spring s ,· Colora d o 81601 Beth A. Whittier Attorney for Eagle County P . 0. Box 850 Eagle, Colorado 81631 George Rosenberg Attorney at Law P. 0. Box 1115 Eagle, Colorado 81631 this 20th day of October, 1980 . erk , .. DEPARTME~T OF COM~!u'NITY DEVELOPMENT · =:· ·'. -r • • .. RECEIPT -Th e Tow n of Vail N C} 4 7751 RECEN E DFROM ______________ ~~----~--~----------------------- ADDRESS ------------~~--~~----------~------~---------------- P ermi t N u mbe r s __________ _ P olice R e c e ip t Numb ers ____________ _ HOW PAI D-Cash _____ Check ____ _ B y ___________________________ ___ ~ --------------~ TOW~... elF '-'A I L Mi s cellan e ou s Cas h 0 4 -27-93 13 :15:£11 -------------------- ~:ece i pt . # 1 22?2 1 Acco unt . # CK # 804 S TH JRRT E:ROltJN '··.DF.:E: FEE H m ou n t t en de r e d .. :· 200 . 00 Ite m pa i d Amount pa i d 0 1 000041331000 200 .00 C h a n ge returned > 0. 0£1 THRNK YO U Veou r-cash 1 e r -F::ERT H H ------------------- . ' • • revised 9/4/91 ORB APPLICATION-TOWN 'OF VAIL, COLORADO DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DATE OF DRB MEETING: ********** THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED ********** I. PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION-: P ! chv.-, '- B. TYPE OF REVIEW: ~ew Construction ($200.00) ____ Minor Alteration ($20.00) Addition ($50.00) Conceptual Review ($0) ~ADDRESS: 8 / '/(J,.( /"'=' ~c: c:!__ D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot (}-t{ Block - Subdivision /-Lc ·q r .. J f ., .L... i c4,....._· //!...; · 2 E. F. G. If property is described by a meets and bounds legal desGription, please provide on a separate sheet and attach to this application. ZONING: LOT AREA: If required, applicant must provide a current stamped survey showing lot area. NAME OF APPLICANT: ~&v.>i'-j / ~. /~~c Mailing Address: /6 (l k;ll .i -1¢ '{-'=# W »~ c ·(') ',;{'d'L /) Pho nE? 3 <'$) ZL/4-f -J'-11 c A~( '(;' '), H. I. J. K. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REP~SENTATIVE: L [,/~.,._. M ~iling Address: ,:J. o _ 15o.x. I D I S'y l _!___ __ .- ( "J S .?Ci Z-5 a Phone ]'1 5:. /Lfa 7 NAME OF OWNERS : ~ ~ ' (-I ~'-'-. *SIGNATURE (S) : Yf. ;.... 7 L 3~.,..,_.___ Mailing Address: __:__ ~'b ~ Phone ._A.. (.,.· 6 ,..,.z..._;::r- Condominium Approval if applicable. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at the time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when applying for a building permit, please identify the accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vail will adjust ~he fee according to the table below, to 1 ji~r~fq7 ensure the correct fee i s paid. ~~ ~~ FEE PAID: $ ~( ~. FEE SCHEDULE: ~~~ VALUATION FEE · v1Vt~ $ 0-$ 10,000 $ 20.00 $ 10,001 $ 50,000 $ 50.00 $ 50,001 $ 150,000 $100.00 $150,001 $ 500,000 $200.00 $500,001 $1,000,000 $400.00 $ . Over $1,000,000 $500.00 . * DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL EXPIRES ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL APPROVAL UNLESS A .BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED AND CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED. **NO APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OWNER'S SIGNATURE -'-"·· 1 II. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING: A pre-application meeting with a member of the planning staff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additional application information is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to determine if there are additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamline the approval process for your project. III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicate property lines, building lines and building corners. All trees to be removed must be taped. All site tapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requires two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a conceptual approval and a final approval. Applicants should plan on presenting their development proposal at a minimum of two meetings before obtaining final approval. C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not asked in advance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB docket until such time as the item has been republished. D. The following items may, at the discretion of the zoning administrator, be approved by the Community Development Department staff (i.e. a formal hearing before the DRB may not be required) : a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changes which do not alter the existing plane of the building; and b. Building addition proposals not visible from any other lot or public space. At the time such a proposal is submitted, applicants must include letters from adjacent property owners and/or from the agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association stating the association approves of the addition. E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow, wetland, etc), a hazard study must be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazard report prior to the issuance of a building permit. Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Planner prior to DRB application to determine the relationship of the property to all mapped hazards. F. For all residential construction: a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the inside face of the exterior structural walls of the building; and b. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a four foot distance from the exterior face of the building walls or supporting columns. G. If ORB approves the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval must be resolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit. 2 ; t· ,.....------------------------ . \ IV. NEW CONSTRUC~ • A . Three copies of a recent topographic survey, stamped bv a licensed surveyor, at a scale of 1" = 20' or larger, on which the following information is provided: 1. Lot area. 2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or more, in which case, 5' contour intervals may be accepted. 3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more, as measured from a point one foot above grade. 4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders, intermittent streams, etc.) . 5. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.), centerline of stream or creek, required creek or stream setback, 100-year flood plain and slopes of 40% or more, if applicable. 6. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert. This information should be clearly stated on the survey so that all measurements are based on the same starting point. This is particularly important for height measurements. See Policy On Survey Information, for more information regarding surveys. 7. Locations of the following: a. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales, etc. must be shown. b. Exact location of existing utility sources and proposed service lines from their source to the structure. Utilities to include: Cable TV Sewer Gas Telephone Water Electric c. Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals to be located on site or in the right-of -way adjacent to the site. Revocable permits from the Town of Vail are required for improvements in the right-of-way. d. Property lines -distances and bearings and a basis of bearing must be shown. e. All easements (Title report must also include existing easement locations) 8. Existing and finished grades. 9. Provide spot elevations of the street, and a minimum of one spot elevation on either side of the lot, 25 feet out from the side property l ines. B. Site Plan 1. Locations of the following: a. Proposed surfa c e drainage on and off site. b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spot elevations must be shown. 2. All existing i mprov e ments including structur e s, landscaped areas, service areas, storage areas, walks, driveways, off-street parking, loading areas, retaining walls (with top and bottom of wall spot elevations), and othe r existing site improvemen t s. 3 NOTE: 3. Jltvations of top of roof ritlts (with existing and proposed grades shown underneath) . These elevations and grades must be provided in order for the staff to determine building height. All ridge lines should be indicated on the site plan. Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicated on the site plan with corresponding finished and existing grade elevations. 4. Driveway grades may not exceed 8% unless approved by the Town Engineer. C. Landscape Plan (1" = 20' or larger) -3 copies required 1. The following information must be provided on the landscape plan. The location of existing 4" diameter or larger trees, the location, size, spacing and type (common and latin name) of all existing and proposed plant material. All trees to be saved and to be removed must also be indicated. The plan must also differentiate between existing and proposed vegetation. 2. Complete the attached landscape materials list. 3. The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for plant material following its installation. 4. Existing and proposed contour lines. In order to clarify the inter-relation of the various development proposal components, please incorporate as much of the above information as possible onto the site plan. D. Sign off from each utility company verifying the location of utility service and availability (see attached) . E. A preliminary title report must accompany all submittals, to insure property ownership and location of all easements on property. F. Architectural Plans (1/8" = 1' or larger, 1/4" is preferred scale for review) 3 copies required. 1. Scaled floor plans and all elevations of the proposed development. Elevations must show both existing and finished grades. 2. One set of floor plans must be "red-lined" to show how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was calculated. 3. Reductions of all elevations and the site plan (8- 1/2" x 11") for inclusion in PEC and/or Town Council memos may be requested. 4. Exterior surfacing materials and material colors shall be specified on the attached materials list. This materials list must be completed and submitted as a part of ORB application. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented to the Design Review Board meeting. G. Zone check list (attached) must be completed if project is located within the Single-Family, Primary/Secondary or Duplex zone districts. H. Photos of the existing site and where applicable, of adjacent structures. 4 I . The Zon~g Administrator and/or D~ay require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samples and other materials (including a model) if deemed necessary to determine whether a project will comply with Design Guidelines. V. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS. Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopment proposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopment proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requirements set forth above, provided all important specifications for the proposal including colors and materials to be used are submitted. VI. ADDITIONS -RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL A. Original floor plans with all specifications shown. B. Three sets of proposed floor plans 1/8" = 1' or larger (1/4" = 1' is preferred) C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and proposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevations with existing and proposed grades shown underneath. D. Elevations of proposed addition. E. Photos of the existing structure. F. Specifications for all materials and color samples on materials list (attached) . At the request of the Zoning Administrator you may also be required to submit: G. A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability. See attached utility location verification form. H. A site improvement survey, stamped by registered professional surveyor. I. A preliminary title report, to verify owners h ip of property, which lists all easemen t s. VII. FINAL SITE PLAN Once a building permit has been issued, and constructio n is underway, and before the Building Department will schedule a framing inspection, two copies of an Improvement Location Certificate survey (ILC) stamped by a registered professional engineer must be sub m itted . The following information must be provided on the ILC: A. Building location(s) with ties to property corners, i.e. distances and angles. B. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot. c. All utility service line as-builts, showing type of material used, and size and exact location of lines. D. Drainage as-builts. E. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner. F. All property pins are to be either found or set and stated on improvement survey. G. Al l easements. H. Building floor elevations and all roof ridge elevations with existing and proposed grades shown under the ridge lines. 5 ,-------------------------------- e VIII.CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW A. Submittal requirements: The owner or authorized agent of any project requiring design approval as prescribed by this chapter may submit plans for conceptual review by the Design Review Board to the Department of Community Development. The conceptual review is intended to give the applicant a basic understanding of the compatibility of their proposal with the Town's Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommended primarily for applications more complex than single- family and two-family residences. However, developers of single-family and two-family projects shall not be excluded from the opportunity to request a conceptual design review. Complete applications must be submitted 10 days prior to a scheduled ORB meeting. The following information shall be submitted for a conceptual review: 1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals twenty feet; 2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials and a description of the character of the proposed structure or structures; 3. Sufficient information to show the proposal complies with the development standards of the zone district in which the project is to be located (i.e. GRFA, site coverage C:::alC:::l.llations, number of parking spaces, etc.); 4. Completed DRB application form. B. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, the Department of Community Development shall review the submitted materials for general compliance with the appropriate requirements of the zoning code. If the proposal is in basic compliance with the zoning code requirements, the project shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptual review. If the application is not generally in compliance with zoning code requirements, the application and submittal materials shall be returned to the applicant with a written explanation as to why the Community Development Department staff has found the project not to be in compliance with zoning code requirements. Once a complete application has been received, the ORB shall review the submitted conceptual review application and supporting material in order to determine whether or not the project generally complies with the design guidelines. The ORB does not vote on conceptual reviews. The property owner or his representative shall be present at the DRB hearing. 6 --------------- • LIST OF MATERIALS • NAME OF PROJECT: /-... 0 T G''.. ~ ~P!Yl~,u ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT C::...::f._ BLOCK -=-SUBD;t:VISION k£1---i /2. 4 %r.t... '+f 2- STREET ADDRESS : /~c.J SA txd cl t....:.. e ~ .J. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: J(p (/H , ( Cc74u h lzp~..$; The following information is required for submittal to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given: A. B. BUILDING MATERIALS: Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other TYPE OF MATERIAL LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer: Phone: COLOR PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name Quantity Size* PROPOSED TREES EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED *Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous trees. Minimum height for coniferous trees is 6 feet. 7 c. D. PLANT MATE ~S: Botanical Name Comm tlt Name Quantity Size* PROPOSED SHRUBS EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED *Indicate size of proposed shrubs. Minimum size of shrubs is 5 gallon. GROUND COVERS SOD SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR METH O D OF EROSION CONTROL ~ Sguare Footage LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please show the number of fixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting plan on the list below and provide the wattage, height above grade and type of light proposed. OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retaining walls. Maximu m height of walls within the front setback is 3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the property is 6 feet. 8 1 . • ~ILITY LOCATION VERIFICAT ~ SUBDIVISION JOB NAME LOT B L OCK --------------FILING ----~2,~---------- ADDRES S The locati o n and availability of utilities, whether they be main trunk lin e s or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by the following utilities for the accompanying site plan. Authorized Signature U .S. West Communications 1-800-922-1987 468-6860 or 949-4530 Public Service C ompany 949-5 7 81 Gary Hal l Holy Cross Electric A s soc. 949-5892 Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Heritage Cablevision T .V . 949-5530 Steve Hiatt Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District * 476-7480 Fred Haslee NOTE : 1. This form is to verify service availability and location . This should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. 2. For any new construction proposal, the applicant must provide a completed utility verification form . 3. If a utility company has concerns with the proposed construction, the utility representative should not directly on the utility verification form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be spelled out in detail in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company to resolve identified problems. 4 . If the utility verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies , and no comments are made directly on the form , the Town will presume that there are no problems and that t he development can proceed. 5 . These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the Town of Vail, Department of Public Works and to obtain utility locations before digging in any public right-o f-way or easement in the Town of Vail. A building permit is not a street cut permit. A street cut permit must be obta i ned separately. * Please bring a site plan, floor plan , and elevations w hen obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation signatures . Fire flow needs must be addressed. 9 --------~ ---------~- ZONE CHECK FOR SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS DATE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot ______ Block ____ Filing ------------------ ADDRESS: OWNER -------------------------------PHONE -------------------- ARCHITECT ----------------------------PHONE -------------------- ZONE DISTRICT PROPOSED USE **LOT SIZE Height Total GRFA Allowed Existing Proposed Total (30) (33) Primary GRFA ------+ 425 =---------J Secondary GRFA ------+ 425 =-------- Setbacks Front Sides Rear Water Course Setback Site Coverage Landscaping Retaining Wall Heights Parking Garage Credit Drive: View Corridor Encroachment: Environmental/Hazards: 20' 15' 15' (30) (50) 3' I 6' ____ Reqrd (300) (600) (900) (1200) __ _ Permitted Slope ~ Actual Slope ____ __ Date approved by Town Engineer: Yes ______ __ No ________ _ ? ? ? ________ _ 1) Flood Plain 2) Percent Slope 3) Geologic Hazards a) Snow Avalanche ________________ __ b) Rockfall c) Debris Flow 4) Wetlands. ____________________________ _ Previous conditions of approval (check property file>~=--------------­ Does this request involve a 250 Addition? How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this request? ---- **Note: Under Sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code, lots zoned Two Family and Primary/Secondary which are less than 15,000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The Community Development Department may grant an exception to this restriction provided the applicant meets the criteria set forth under Sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code including permanently restricting the unit as a long-term rental unit for full- time employees of the Upper Eagle Valley. 10 • • <D CJ) lO 0? lO v (j) ("") 0 ("") ...... r.n a:: 0 0 <D >-w CX) > a:: 0 ::l r.n 0 0 <{ a:: z 0 <{ ..J ..J 0 0 u w a:: r.n w I-<.:J r.n z <.:J 0: w a.. a:: r.n ...... 0 0 r.n 0 a:: ~ w z w w z ..J <.:J <.:J z w ...... <.:J CJ) z <D I-<D ..J X ::l r.n 0 z CXl 0 0 u a.: ...... ...... >-z w <{ ::l a.. z ::2 w 0 > u <{ <.:J 0 z 0 a:: <{ w a:: w 0 z ..J <.:J 0 z u w CX) 0 CX) 0 <{ a:: 0 0 ..J w .. Ha ro ld Engstr o m P . 0 . B o x 130 Vail, Co l o rado Dear Mr. Engstrom: October 31, 1977 81657 Enclosed please find the Drainage Study and sketch of the proposed drainage improvements for Homestake 4 , Lot G-4 of the Lion's Ridge Subdivision, Filing Two. If there are any questions, please contact m e . Very truly yours, DWG/lkp ENG . • DRAINAGE STUDY FOR LOT G-4 LIONS RIDGE SUBDIVISION FILING TWO VAIL, COLORADO Prepared By: • Eldorado Engineering Company 818 Colorado Avenue, P.O. Box 669 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 October 31, 1977 / ~----------------- LOCATION: • Drainage Study for Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing Two Vail, Colorado • Lot G-4, Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing Two, consists of approximately 1 3/4 acres of which approximately one acre is proposed for development as Homestake 4. The property 1 ies just \~est of Red Sandstone Creek in the County of Eagle, North of I-70 in the N l/2 N l/2 of Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th Pri nci pa 1 t ·1eri dian, Eagle County, Colorado. The property is about l/4 mile West of Red Sandstone Road. DRAINAGE AREA: The property ·lies in a minor drainage area labeled "A" on the attached map. The total drainage area feeding towards the property is a little over 8 acres. 10 acres has been used in the calculations. The drainage area is steeply sloped with sparse vegetation and a run-off coefficient of 0.3 has been estimated. RAINFALL INTENSITY: The maximum expected rainfall in a oRe-hour period for the Vail area has been estimated at 3 inches for a 100-year storm. Applying this rainfall with the overland flow time the rainfall intensity which should be used is 6 inches per hour. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: For smaller drainage areas of this nature the Rational formula is the best known and most conservative method used in calculating storm water run-off. Run-off is computed as follows: Q = ciA where: Q = pea k discharge in cubic feet per second c = coefficient of run-off, in this case esti m ated at 0. 3 = rainfall intensity, in this case calculated to be 6.0 A = drainage area, in this case calculated as 10 acres. • • therefore: Q = ciA = 0.3 X 6.0 X 10 = 18 c.f.s. Where any culvert pipes are required the following is recommended: Grade Pipe Size maximum 3 % minimum 1 % SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Drainage from the West will enter the site if and when it overflows Sandstone Drive. The developer and architect should pay close attention to the grading along the East side of Sandstone Drive between same and the pro- posed retaining wall. That wall should not be subjected to run-off water overflowing it or 11 ponding 11 behind the wall. Once on the site the run-off water may be adequately handled by the conventional storm drainage system of pipes and inlets. Stor m Drain Inlet #1 and #2 should be drop type to facilitate the proposed change in levels and grades. This has the added advantage of reducing the velocity and therefore dissipating the energy of the run-off. Piping should be sized in accordance with the above reco m mendation. Headwall #1 should be constructed to hold and protect the outfall pipe. A concrete apron with energy dissipators may be constructed if erosion on the slope East of the property is a problem. Roof drains should be directed to the parking area. The parking area should be graded to create run-off as shown by the flow direction arrows on the plan. • • CONCLUSION: The subject property should not be seriously affected during a heavy storm as no major drainage crosses through it. The limited development should not cause any significant increase in run-off as a percentage of the total area. It should be noted that run-off is proposed to be directed fro m a pipe and headwall to property to the East. A map submitted by yourself to us indicates that the proposed drainage system for Lots A-9 and A-8 to the East will include a run-off area at the discharge point of Lot G 4 . Additional attention m ay have to be given to this area to verify the ability of the area to carry the calculated run-off above as it relates to the design concept for Lots A-9 and A-8 . It should also be noted that a site specific analysis was not done. For the rainfall intensity developed, and because of unknown modifications which Sandstone Drive m ay see in the future, it is assu m ed that Lot G 4 will be subject to all the run-off fro m the contributory drainage area. No detailing was done on the drainage structu r es. Respectfully sub m itted, r-~~~' Dean W. Go o Eldorado ng ·neering Company XlO rcET · · ) . . MI LE ....... .. •. ";I ~ . ' :·· ~ .. ' . ·. -:· ·-"· R . 80 W . · lS J ooo ... E. ROAD CLASSIFICATION Prima ry highway, ·,Light -duty road . hard or I ; ha rd surface .. ___ -improved s u rf ac e .:...:·_====;>-== ·•Seconda ryhi ghway, ·~-•. ~ '~; ·~·-.:·:. h ard s urf ace ._ .. __ -~~=·····::;Unimor ovP.d ro:~rl ·.:_.:.~---- . • . ~·· p ' .. ·. :)· /"·., :::L _::J . . ~ ... ~.~::j ~:>~:· . . .:. . · .. : .. :::· ' •. : i . ~ . ··--~ I I I 1 J I 1 I l J I T HE COLLABORATIVE ~ROUP , f!.C . 4482 ~\ , .... "----;rrn' 200 WATTS 3,&50 Lumena 150 '"A 2,600 L .-0 .... ,,.. PLANT SCHEDULE S ~O L Q4JA NTITY C (.JNII.W IWE BOT AA I C A L N AME S IZE 9 4 A S PE W POf'\J... US T RU'IUL 0 I [)£ S PY RU S (S OR 8 U S) 3 -4"C olt.L 7 M()I.Jf l A IN ASH 3 -4 " CAL ES 57 E rrt&E l ~ S PRUCE MOU N TA IM J UN I P ER W I LD RE D R A S PIE R R ~ C {JW)H WI LD RO S E P I C EA ENGE L HANN I S 8 -10 Fl J " W R 61 11 6 J UNIPER US C ~I S ~S S TRIGOSU S ROSA SAY I K A S RE Q 'D B E ARB E ~Y K INN IK I NNI C K A RCTOS TAPHY LOS UVA UR S I B 2 2 B U S H C I N QU EFO IL P OTE N TIL LA F R U IT I COSA GENERAL MOTtS : A ll O ISTUR8 E D AREA S TO ll RESEE ~D VI T H HI~ AlT IT UDf SEED 1'\I XT IIIIE : POT O.W: ORC HAAI ""-'S S AMttW. ~VE ;,uss PENNIFlNf ,.eiiE M IAL m: G M S S .....Ctwt SHOOnl -Of£ DURAR HAR D ft SCll: S L E H0£11. ~AT I ~ (-.E I G HT 8Y 'l ) 1 5'.1; I S'.!; 20% 1 5'.1; 20% AA TE OF APPL I CA Ti oN WIL l K 736 PURE: liVE SE E D S PE R ACJIIE . S OO .AAE A S S HALL 8£ 8 L l£ GRA SS (PCIIU'U.TU S I S} P\I XT I.I\E : F'E RT i liZE• AP'Pt.ICA T I (III s-Ll. S,._AO Pf t!Dft T O LA YI ~ OF SOD. F'EIU i lllU C~PO SITt ml 5*t.L aE l0-2 0 -1 0 AH O S mAD AT A Mlt W 4o LB S PH 1 .000 SQ..fT . AL L T REES SH.\l.l BE ST --U VtTM STtEL 'T ' STAAES AND GlN'E~ WI I ll W.. VIR£. NYLON STAAPI'I MC $11W.L M USU .-......o TllltK TO l"tU:W:II'f ~IIDlllilliO . shrub plantin« lletail ' 'V Typical --- • a U .L. Usted and Patented \NoodFoml !ighling units are Underwrit ers' Laborat ory listed ''Su.tab'e tOr wtl'f local ionS" and are so labelud . St•nd•rd ~hts, Series 3200 Boll8fdl (with rneal) toO III!ATTS 1,580 Lumena 5 GAL 5 G A L 5 GA L DUTDOO~ @) ® LIGHTING SC .HEOULE J .ll p!q QOUC ,.S 18& ~o -r u4 I 3055 ' • -::;t:Clu:.~ of Malet .als I 6[ -" " ~ . . """ 1 . -- hit our ao-1 81 WoocFomo k> ~ the finelt wood i(llting a ·· · +-on 1he -»<loy . Oooailod-;o;n..y .... ~ .......... t~ctnques ... OOiibii led wilh ~ ~ CaiiDmia i'8dw<Xl1 tl() ~ an eN:! r;:roducl: suitab6e lof the most deo••odiftg ~~and~ .. ,. lio•IS . Calilcornia I'80Mx:ld varies In ct:Jia '"'"' 19" cNny., .... mot>ogony. When ~ in 1 1 h .. strips tt._ co:Xlrs CUi •!bit• to form an ~ and nctMdualy l6lique mceaic. O t I 1Fai&i6 -ODnl&rudlld ol ~-certified kin- dried , dear al-heart c.won-~­ Redwood is prized M)lkiMde tor it5 bNuty and n8tur.l resiAano& to decay and insect '-anadl . 'kl adlt'ld 1he ~ kJng lite e~Cp8Cta~"Cy Of Cellomia redwood , 'A'ft t rest aN finished products with r;jear , watet - r.,.: r It NtE.OOX-1 28 . ·' IE DEVELOPM E NT VAH. COLORADO I 7 • ? I ' ~ ' ·I I ! r'l ; I r -----f-----f -"-4 ·.1.~ I I ---~~-r·~~t ~-~~~~~--~-I I -_.,.,_,__----!,1 2 1 """~~!2 i' ' . -_.., ·?r ox. , , ~U!.Diii"'S -:----'-- ~I" C ~l ff / ~ u U.o+o ~L.;--',...-.,..<;:)~ ,""~ t"' i"'OC I"-!'~ 1/"'.11 1 1 ~ u NA I-t..1 'o !'1P..iC~ Ci-1 ff f:d cf<. ' / / N.L ONV~i-WA"f? ~tf l-l ~N ~ T ~w,..._y A('IO Y"'-P+-.C1~ 0 HAI.i.. l!:otJ ~1'-I G ~ I"'"'V I!!~ }'.N O ~~-PI ~HJ:> .?HI<" ~N ff'-Y fl:"P..::~--~. f l n iJ'.H ~ ~Ht! .:::>ti '?1ft. ["'WI . ~tj ~t'-H C/A'?ti ~ l...iH '7 ~ 1>-~ M ""'" 1'-1!" H 1 -r H ~><r rz.vv w 0 k:1 ~ . ·-· ... ---.. ------' J3 r ----,.__ LANDSCAPE _PLAN 1994 1 ''==----I ,, -'lo -o - I I~ _.M A ll ', l"'l"d r"'.?'11'r:::> (~) !"'~ fl·n::fN i T I I.ANOSCAPING SYMBOLS -----...... / \ f__._ ) -----(£}:.ROCK OuTCROPPDI& ~(E) ASPeN Of) DECIDUotiS -OU.-mDIU1l -!liNGLE PUNl" -MULTI-PLANTING I / I . REVISIONS BY H :z'N wo z ::::2:(!) a..z -I Ou_ b~ QO _J..J z <( -' c. w c. <( (.) (/) 0 z <( -I . '0 -_, en w -:E ---..-· ro -0 : "' ,., ~ e>l ; ..,. z ..,: 0 ,. 0 . > x ! . '0 o i ~ ........ : 0 ·:> J .... > 0 ,o ; w ·! 0 -IL l > :~ 0 < z > < a: C1 ORAWN H ~ ' CHECKED DATE AF'f l l-I CJ"'4 n aCALE I 1 =-~· -2 o -101!1 NO . 94o4 SHEET 1 1-A OF 7 S HEETS I ,. -.. . ,. . . . ~... : • . . ' . • ' • ;J• .. , • ' .. ,. '· .. ' . ·. . -' .. .. . . . -t "'· -~ --,. • .t ,.-i • . - ~ ... :i. . . ·~- -... ··-~ .· \ 14" * AP'?L Y tAY·H? 0~ 57 RAW OVl!'£. .C!... E-.4 J.../ '5TO/J E !AI PI.AMrER BE!=O.e'E P!ACti-Ji=J 70P.SQ!/.. --r---- • 1!1 .• ·-~--'--- • . . . -.. t -# 5. ~F!:S I@<-~/ fZ" 6Jf1/K.II-Jq • • s'-o• . . ' . ' ' r I I j .s·-~M 1-.... , ----;r-------- -.# 5 54~ f@ / /'1" S~INI:(__./ · .. • • • ~ .. · "·------------5/T-E:-. S£.CT!OIJ •. : ; ~Lt' o/4-", J'-0" e'-o WOV£1-1 WJI?.IE JJET 70 PEE V.£1-../T IZoGI::. AZOM pU$HIN~ /H!COUL.-JH BETWEEI-1 "7/ M 8 £1?5 (·:TYPic..4 L) ---------------------- . . MIN :3'-o~ -Ns 84rs f@ 12' 5Pactf../C:; W+-SI -I c,.• THIC K -CDM:;~ETE 6J.m r....E LT.ed C>E 7V lOW POINT JIJ W4LL () ,., ' '\\II ' I I ~- 1 • . ·. . . '1 . -.. -. ' • ' ()<j' . . ' ~ --:-4 -- q ·., ' - 4 .J ~-_-• ~ .•. {: <1 . • • • .::1 ' .. • • • -----5/TE SEC. Tl Oi-.'5 8 EAST A../OTE; :;:·-·E: ~=-T .:;t..'S ·-U:V,/£ ICEVTi:..A!_ -EX C:. ~ T ""A5 SH-:::>11. .0 _Ap:J,/£ . II..J LC/Jc W.t.:..!.. OF :3 -:.FCi/QIJ /3 WES~ P£CV 1 v£ Vt '£~t...E.-JJE:: _r:..;_~l/E --'---'""-~ A..., iv"'D · CCiJ../T' o.r :.t.J. . .:~-~- TC P/..'::. \' ~·E WEALE .'-H' p;_,.r, IJE j_;,,~·-U5E f/C>< !' WO:.~ 5TE! c ~t/L ~ .f!C ~~~-5. ,• ~ .... ""' l? E A1C-. "'£-s-;r.e/;;-: H ,-,_ F0£1.~5 .4.4...:·;-f/:.._ t :~--"'' _._!:;" ~-C:'"' v-., ,..,~ 1..-1..!. _ ~,_. C4:.JLK!)Jt:;. C!-7 ::x:. ;.v;~-..1;-Er!.JL-..€ !CNt:?'..,..!X'''J.4!.. E:-£-.S,ifec; ("' ~-_1 4--''"': 8'-0" ·. 845-E c O'../B£: 4L:;ZE~T£;- > •' I • ...... ,_ , -Si. 4 .~1:8· (iJ 12"· 8P.4CJI.I.Z:; · ,-? ·!JAf?~ ~a; ff !JW<.:n.r.t:; :o ----- • 'f ' • '· ( ' -~ 5 f!;ARS 6! 9• BFJ&Cii-JI--, ~tTEJJt:>ED '"f4 .':..:JJ.J7D 'WALL • . ' .., . . ··.·~.·<1 -. . "' T • ., . f •. ... j • • • ... l> • ., - . . . < • r. • • • ( ., • . - . > ., ' I I ~ ........_#4 /34/?S ·((i) ;2"SRICI<.It!:t -£KiE.VP 2_4 __ •JJ./'lD -W.4LL • • l t • ~" -- • . ,. . ':.~~. - ... ·""' )'..,· .... -r;eh.L TIMB£f:S $. JAJ5T.4LL. ~4· LoJ.Jr:. ("~ I # & ~f_e'S OV£1?. LAP 84£>'-:S 1'2' ~ TH4T P4R.J(tUJ:t 5t-CT /OJ../ IJJ 4 .te EA I-EV-E: L SOUTH We 5 T COR!JEJ?..· 8242 .5 We$/ 0~ /3U!Lf?IN/.::; '-I £4CH TIM5E£.. 15 TiEl? /0 ;::;vE OTHE£: I TIM8tZ5 AS SkOINA.! - • 'FIIJ/~1-it:v .::?i..A•"' ~ \ -I ~ r --·<:7 ). ·S\ ·~'l/' . ~~::~;m oe qf:'.tPE _/ . --l - ~ • ! -11 c;"' ££!5.4!7..5 w; n: ' z ~ • .::::>V-EC. LAP • f.-:~ '~ "'i:<? ~-.~~'iJ}:_ , IY PIC A J_. -~ ) '<o --: ·-" ...... ,...., . 'i. t _,.. . -~ l ~-..:!:~' ,' 8 /..OU-"7 '? !?.'. ~ EJ: Tl V 13!.[/ ·p--• ' ~--, .• ... ----~ ' ' ' ' "'Jl f 3 \~, ' . . ()S:_l'-~'~ct -~ z ·I ·~ __ ""'(:~~f)._ "l ~. c ~ ·:r :.... ... ~·-·~,..._( • ' ' t~ '"' • r=· ·-= ..... -....... • ~ . ..; ._o ~ z-t 0 ::v:)~-3 . ' !'fi;"ft·-=---;_lll!-' :--rm•·4 · 'w1RG ,yc;=--• l -" I ._ i <:," l' ~.;·(~~ t"J 0~~~ -'IIi!_~ j 1 J}ff , /~iJift.•-~·_;o;;:l ~-: I lili[l~ ?'---)' ----· '.j:h-----"-'-'. ~.;_:;,--;:-:- I . a ..;,a ~t:! < 0'-c:"•;,; ~.I= I iJiiT ~c,J ~ J{l ;,.. ·cT, ' ' ( \ ;;~;. ' '-'I'.,. >, ,. .. x ?-0-~>r/<·>,~-...:._.1-i;/ /, ·~·. • I ' I • ' f?.IVE J?£841? D A MQ./ OF II' 11>11'0 Wl?I57VK8EP ) 'Y Ff?OI.JT HALF A.?CTI~ To BE) 84UFILLEE? WITH o/'4'r ;}Z".::t£4/J 5'TOIJ£ \~j Yt! SoiL. "'£E4£: J..f4U: WB& ~C.t:.F/LL£P WI/H NAI!VE MA7'E£1AL l "<D ® ® ~ ._/ NOT TO 5C:.ALE I /..JOTES LOAKPFTE 5:[t::.ENqTH -30::0 Ps.l. 4T 28 P4 YS 1?£1/FOT:CIJ.Jf; STEt--qf:AP£: C:>CJ , /''! = C.O, CDO 'PS. '. "'01! 1"'/·Jjl ' .. ..,../ ~" • • -::::> I --v. J; ' ......_; ._ . .... J p ~ .t::-/-;...· " r;;: !/ .___.V_.i---·--~p ..... ,..l :... . .,.. ;l .., -r-.-"'· !)!MiUS/0/j~ '.'~ !...'£-1!./f:O/ _EM EIJT S-Qj1 !..) !~ ,C~ ·-r-,~ ::..,'( 4/J!/ Sa-CO/JP.'TIOA./5 c.,pE..:.Jr :=:-;:: <'t-,_::;.r A 1 r~rc C'J '!'··-r::r---"-r ~~-1 ,::: ~r, •r ,-, ·,1. '-.-:u 1 -,,-.-::O•J--•-.-' J::' ' · ._,.._ _,&/,., ;_ r/f"""{ >oj "-f' 1-~ '--_., o.-...._....L//'--< 1 If~_,-~ -' _.._,._.. ::...... I' sn::ucniJ.fE. .. ;.:;1 u ::.:.::r:. SJ-!DULD f:E co Al::::..._ _ . T£~7!/T=-OF::;::;.[: ()F D.'f".Y...,.f]: CO!u'::::D9E /:£"!;:,/}1)./f: J :~~: '? 70 8E S?E::tPEP tr4J.~C-4-VT.6~ TI/.113EF5 V5H ' 1/J TIM8E£.. l?G7AIIJII.'q Wrl'.:.L 544.:. L l?E WOL M.Li!J S?'L 7.S P.E'!$SU.E'G TJ.'LtTE[? WIJ.-1.4 U/1 1 /!·1YM J:£T£!:.JT/O.i./ OF C. 4C PC.U'./,-~.:;: ?£? c.ue :'..: ~a:;rr: TIM8E!.':: 914!..:... P£ WE5T£DJ Y£LLOV;/ P!/.IE Or SV;'I.!P4£C SIZE: c;; -;...c;; ".-8 · o..e: c;-, 8 .. ...-8: T!M6££'S SHALL !5£ /IJ!::U :;TJ?..!AL qK4PE. '3f1E S5:.:.7C!~'~ /[JE(f7/I=/C..4T!O.U REFER. TO S ITE SE...!/01/S SL!OWI../ o..U S!TE PL41! 5Y H4!-..0LP £/JL:::;STf:OM, A.E:CI-I!TEc::: .. T @ 7 YP-f: 1I S'JLF/fT-E-R.ES'ST!IJT C£MCJ..F; 51-/0:J:..D 8E U5E? 1/J T4E CO!JC..t.ETE. J. .. SIT-E:-SECT!OIJS EAST~ ,, ,, C, £4~T N O. REVISION DAT E BY WT TO 5CAL E . ' f./OM E 5T4K..E 4- L /O IJ5 .£1/?.l.:t£ S U8PJV!5IOAI-F /LJJJL7 NO.2 '!,~-E-741/Jq W4L L .-. S7~VCTll K.4l .:;J /ETA lj;$ ' • > • • J •• ' t ' •• • ' • • ' . . . • ... .A_ . .J~ :-:, ... ,.. •• -· ' • _¥" ~" ~ ~k.. ,._ . . • • ~;;. >-So ! . • ~ITE I'" '20 ' -· l< • ~ • - • __,_ _____ _ ' ,. " ... 6EGTJON ' .. " . . ~I TE ~ECT\ON t:l •<;; • -'O • . 4_;, I '. ) ./ ( ·-......___ ., •. ...,._ -·- ' ;:J.A Jt£D -END SecT P-IS 01TE 0EC:-ION I'~ 2:) --- IBI I 1 I - ----- -r 1 AJ.JP CO I>JCf:t-r~ 4PI?OIJ -~­ W / th 'H:t.vY /)t~S IPA70 R (7"YP !CAI...) ~ c..;= ..bo.... . \, I I ! 1 }' ,-/ I. ~I ' () . I ' I I I \ Of .I 0 0 c 0 6EC-T/ON ;.-I ' STONE S SET ' ' ~ ' ,-,...., ,.--r ,.~ • ( < OPeN EN P P,PE Pf2CT:::CTA:'-~J ~-VEVIC-E . W j .; "x-4' OPEt Jt)...l q S _,--J-s "P J. ~-" ------.: EA/Z CO;../CR-t-7-E: APRo!l wj-£NER[;;Y . 'Y/5SIP4TO!.S ..... "__,..5 . .. -. I .. -~~--~~ ,· I --+---. STOEM _S I TE. ~ECTION !'' "' 'ZO ' -- I ------------ I I "· •....• <_._,-.; .;. ~-~ '\-·:.. ~ . . . .· . : ·-. ~ '. --t·~ ··: .. . . .. .... .-. "·-c • • ' •· • • •.• i .;_ . ;._-. ( ·---- ''• .. -- ,. ' .· -. :-:;· · .... ·.-. ~---' ... : ..... _' ::-. . .· -- . .. . . ---=------------+- 1 ,. - \ / I ,I I ---~ <...C"Jo.. ...... "-_-: ~ ~--" _. _;t: ' .J --1 '"-. -·~· -----! I I I ' I ,, . . '-, LOW /"OO.!T lA/ C.(./~(3 --N OTE · VAIL COLORADO ..---..: C.'.JC F £-t L-.1 T--/·-_p +L v ::;/ /Q r I . . r . T-:EL ~ .~ 8 1(,0 / 1?404. "' I ' zi ~~ lL ~ u t---li -I ,[1 ,1 I I I ~ o Tc; 1, < .. ' lJ ~,n -6 ~r i:l i~ oe ::J _j{\ ~ . .,. ~£ ~~0 UJN ~ s ." a::;i!P:t;, ,,~' "' z 0 "' > w "' ' ·- ·" -~ .... u 0 • -. r • 3 OC T 24 , 19 7 7 ~ ~\ ~~- \S ~ c ~ - \ • =+ - \ I I \ 10 \ ~ ~ ~~ -: L \ \ } ' \ 8 \ \ ] ' r- - - , RE V I S I O N S l ~ - ~ ~I~ \ "" . c \I - t - - .. \ - _L ~ I - : '! f l T I ' - ; 1 1 ' i[ i ' F ' I _ . - I I - , i II _ J I I I · • • . . -,-~~ J Q l L l I . I . . , . . . , :I 1111!.~ .I ' I' I , -~ I· · . . I !1 111 1 = i i ' l j r I ~ i I ·t i i II C- - - - ~ - - - - , ' -~ I I - ~ •l l = IF I' I l 11 i ::: -::: ~~P J ' I ~ I I Ill I ll l . ;= I; I II I 1! - - " ,i +- - = = " r ~ · , 11 r - - - - f - - · · ! • " 11 rm n I!J 1 rfJ t n . , I! ' '. I I ! F f - - - r - - L:~ I ' I !4 - l I. I 1 - - - - I> ~ I ' " . - ' " : . --- . - : . - - - · - . -: - - t< . G i I . I jl l ~ - I ~ += l l ~ j ~ :! ' I 1 t f - - - - ' · · , L l i . . J -1 . ,. . . ~ ~ · r e . f' - - jf l l 1111. I Il l li 1 •. 'I I ' I~ Ill fr l t "' ': : , . - I l l ' I ' I· lo 'I I II : 1 I c ~e ~ 111 111 I - ~ T ·- - = r~ :n I E3 o= . I ~ ·' . . o= f. ~~ Iii ' ' j _ ' j _ I li = Fl l l i I, ~ < l r r· ' I t -- r . - -, ; j , .. , I: \ :: ! I I~ ~ 8i ! - -; . . I) ! . ( I • '1 \ '1 ! , , . ' - ' " ' < = -- ' ll \ ~ l' I .I . __ _ , _ . - r . - - · . I • • •1 l j I 1 . I I I . • L II ll II 1 Jl I r ' - - f .. , . , - , ··-h~- - • ' " " ill .' 1 , H ~ . i _I I ' I ! I : ' " " I 'I . . ' - .• I I. . . ; I I !II i 1 '1 i I .. : ]Ti l T i i r - - ~ '\ j J - -= = . J · _ _r It , ' ll II ~ ' ; = = - . I :• I! . I :rr~ '· I " 'I ' ~ ~ I f- - - - - ' I ' ~ i ' , ' .~ I t- - : : I - [I I . T .. . . A > f~-.-, . ~ ' ~-~.. J,_ , '- t ¥ : ~I '- ~ J I ~· I 1 r · - - - r . l= = f I' ~I ! ' - - - I .L - = ! c _ ~ r • I 11 I~ ~ ~I . ; - ~ I I _ l F ' F : _ 1 - f: : = : j ~ r - - . f - - - ...... - : - - ~ I I - - = r - - -- ~ - - . i l 1-- ' ~ - . ., , . I II ' . 1 - , I . - - . ·1 · .. ·· C I 11 · ·· '· . ! r- ' I ' I I ' '' I ' ~ ' . r ~ • r ; • ' ' ~~ , ... Il l I~ I I f. . - ' I . 'I ' I) i = I I . I I I · - t·-~ I~ :_ I l l I l l it . F t 1= = { 1 1 ' I ill ~ St: J ' . I r. l ni l I 1.1 ! 1 Wl ~~ ~ II 1 jj l l l l l ' l l · ~ t I lii 1 I ~ : ]' t f T I T I .I = I ~I t t ; l ' ' ~ ij ill ~ ll l = . !1 ' 1 . · :, ,· "'' '· ~ /> ' I h~ I ' . 'I I' J ,1 , 11: : 'l l = I .. l 'I , : I ', Il l : : L . , - I ,, ., : II ' I F v< H A R O L D E N G S T R O M , A . I. A . H O M E o T A h E 4 - r- n r 1 \ \ < I~ - ~ ~ r: : z I: : Gl ~ \ ) \ .- . : I - ~ .. . . - V" 7\ l ~ - II I (: ) __ _ , _ / i' l 'I ' II 'I · · ! : •· !l I l, . t I ~ b! "' -\' i ' \ \ ' ~ \- , '5l ~ i l ' f> - l f ' r n ti ~ l\ :z ' 1 j ; ' 1 > [ . - !:.~ f f i '< , " IJ ~\ 1 \ ( \ ' - 1 1 - " r Sl ~ -m z :z . l l " m ' -- - - - - , . iE 3 . - - - - - I ;; ; , / ; i f ,, -l - 1 1 ' ' · q •i ' L l l j ' \ ' ; .., . u u ! /J H u i l l i l r• ' , . I I '- " " ' ''l ' ' l ' ~ ' ' " ~ - l · j · l I , . oi P = o l '1' , - o ~ J-. 1< 1 ' - u " I ft g C _ D " : : : _ _ - - - ; : - - - - - ~ 1 1 1 ·r -t - t· .........o--rr ~ , -r---- - r = ~ ~ t ' l~t-ttttrLrrt m J ' : ! I ~ ·Ii i i "' ' I 1• ' ' ' ' I ·h . ,, : L . 1\ \ I IT \ ~ 4 '0 . , " - : I \ J . -~ I lJ 1 j !! l : l 1 I' p " "' J! l l i ) ~ ~ ~ z A : J . f £ - < 1 ' 4 13 "' lo i ii ,, 1' - I· · . : - . · - I ,I '( ' 1 ·~;l~i. ' ! ' • ~~ I ! , , I I I , 1 f ,. i j ' ' I l: ~ I ' i I i l I [ I f - - ~~ ~ F ~~ m I I I ~ 'J _ Z t l l - - 1 " ' ~ 0 i ~w - '' , 1 1 1 :, , I ~.· · ' · l _ , ~ - -~ - - ~ I I T I I ' I I ' I I i- 1 ' I · .. . I 0~ I - ~ : I ~ : ~~ '• : . l I \S I ~ "' ... . .. I ~ li : I I l i F = r i ' ' I t ' \ ', . " ~ ' i li • j - · t ' -- = = : I ' ' . \ . i ! I ' 1 - - ~ • ' ' : ; ] ' i _j I I I I -L l I : I i I· 1 ,; , I } i I: ' ; j IC - ,. I r 8 l~ !I . I .: . ( I i p = ' [ ! I ~ ~ I I ~''' ~ I I i 11 =' ,., f I I I ' I ' ' 1· I _ J j! ' 1 1 · [ li r · = I· i i ' ' - I h I I ' I I ' I I I I I I j [ [ . i I ' ' I I li ~ , L i ' ' [3 " I [ I ~g I ' I -" / ~ ~ I , A R [ ~ I I f [ l P D . B O X 1 3 0 ~.: . ~ _ C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 5 7 ~a i l ( 3 0 3 1 4 7 6 - 2 1 9 1 LI O N ' 6 ~IC C . . E t: U 5 D M ~ I O N · F ! L I N G 2 ES X : . l e C O U N T " ( , C O ! b ~ EL L V L T ! O N ~ MO N A C O SO U A R E DE N V E R . CO L O R A D O 8 0 2 2 2 64 3 3 E WE S L E Y AV E 30 3 75 9 - 2 3 0 2 0 1 / N e f l - , • ?~ \ V A F ' I T H . !! ? r o M ~ ~0 . OC I . < . 10 1 V A I L , C O ~ , 6 1 6 6 7 ex . J / L D I ~ 'B ' 1 /e , " '" 1'- o " ~ I I -. ; I "' ' ~~ ~ , "' " ). ' I ~ ' "' ! ' ' ! ' ' ' I I I ; I I I [ I c i I J I I I ~ I • ,J!-----= ---~ ---.:....--- 11" I - I L ~J1~~~m:JIDJ .... ···---.r~·~~ llJJ: I ' ' ~I _ __,.,_. -·~ I ~ I L------ J_ .. 00E. EL EVA 710N :,JUIL-u,H :i ~ It::,' .. ~ .. 0' .au,_ ·,~ \ \ ·lr I' • I ~ I --__, 1 t r • " --> • to. -· ' f= - - ][ _Jl :-tf ~ -.. ~ --' -'" -~ j[ JL J ··--- ~ • - I I I I I I j I ~. --~; I(_',• -'-·,....,.+---- ' ~ . .. . [" ·; _:.x:JlJTH ELEVATION-E:>UIL.DINC:. 'A 'E> .. -0' /04.-6' 2. y- ~~~==~~~·~~1.~~~===rr==~~~~~· ~~==~~~ '-I / \.._. I u _]Y PICAL ltJ .. 1'-o ' • (6E!E 'Silt:: F1-A"-l ft>R ~WWIN Ci 1 e: H ODJf1&6.TJON (o R O ff6t'T UHIIS) I ~ ~--WI.-.. t::R. ~.f ov~r;;: ~"' R. e ~e Lt:.va i?U 11-DIHC! ·~ Oti l-y' t= ! L-' ~ ;._ ~ . -• 1:'1 ~ .:::; rr: -t ~~ ~g LJ 28 i:: n - ~ [J~ :n 8a uJ \fV I ~0 E 6' .J~ <(• 1--f'.r .,m • U)~ -r'" • c:___..:> m ID <( Of'. -0~ ~ '--1--J ~ ri 0 DO ~I') a:,__ o - 1--u ~=~ w De.....:> a __J \'! 0 .----..--'~ a: '-+-m <( d I~o: o.n z 0 o.n > w "'·· ~ ~ l-2 ~ 8 ro~ • ~.~ J ~.) r ~I l d t&5 r-- " .,.. -"' "' .. v 0 •. ?ITE 6EGTION 'A; \ ·' LOT G4 ·. SITE 0C:CTION ~-.c.-~-o C.~:!-'!>7 -!:>ITe:. -2 ~ =-o-.1·= (cO ~? I I ~""~\\i...U...'-~ ........ . i;!".?'r-..,.,_ 'B' -- I I -I- I / t-------- ---------::j::::__ --- --------------------~F=~ -------f-- ------ • < SITE. S E CTIO N '0' I -I ·;~- I I / " ~--:----,..·=~,;_1_:_/_ 9~-o" I I .L WALL ---·-B L OCK ''c " \ LION,S RIOGE DEVELOPMENT ·~ VAIL COL.ORAOO I I I I I VICINITY MAP ., ~ ' '-......__ ' \ \ JlJ ~~ ~0 ~ r= i:l 't-fl 0~ D_ 3{l 'i _,I}- u z:t ~ ~~0 . ILl N -{) ~ S x ll tJ \) T I tL ' 7. 0 "'-.nl ~~ nJ ~-'£. ~ ll ~ H§ i.\1 IU !'[ 2.: 1·0 1 0 6 I _j ,< ,__ r-.~ " illm • <0 (\)~ -r • c.__:, rom <l: Or-. • 0 ~ :;! L.W ~;; 0 00 ~(') [I,__ o~ 1-0 ~==~ llJ o~o .J \'! 0,.............,~ [I ,_,_ m <( 0 I~~ "' z 0 "' > ... "' z ~ {) I I-; .. ~ ~~ ~$ 1'- ,f) '" (j 8 -~ Q8 8__; d~ ~ " S: -. .. "' ... u 0 PRINTED ON C lEARPRINT lOOOH E A :>r e.-o-w c~: I ' ~ Pl<Ol'OSe.D DI?.AIW A <i~ ~ .,. ~-+- 0 _, -~ ~ :s tfll 't> ~TrJI'E "I:' ' t =j~ 30-- I :':>ECT r(;N A-A.' " I 0' t-+Oi< ,Z.O N TAL SCALE; I = VU:'T!CN .. SCI>LE..: I"., 2' - wr: ~ r 12-0 VIi UN I' ----lr____.) I o,q ' f + !"->( I -'' 1 i/" ,,.. D1rC1+ {t ' .. HOe/ i!:ONTAL S <2A lE ! ,, , , ~ 2 VEc£TJCAL SC Act i" ::: I , REVISIONS BY C\1 (!l I-z z ...J w LL. -:;E 0.. z 0 0 0 c _J (JJ <( w -a: > > 0 z w c ...J 3: Q ru 0 0 ::J (.) Cl: (JJ <D -"<t w ...J I: I (!l < f-(!) a > Cl: a: < I-3: (JJ UJ 0 -f- _J z rn 0 " ...J Cl: UJ z s: 0 rn '• ..J < .... w 0 UJ Cl < z < Cl: 0 ORAWN C:HECI<ED DATE SCALE ~OB NO . SHEET €' ·~) OF SI-IEETS ' LOT G-5 FOUND ALUM CAP\ LOT G-4 76,848 ;,O. FT I. 764 ACR£5 \ \ '"- ' \ '\_ ,. LOT SUMMARY TOTAL t.:T iiUII.OABLE >U.>f>iS < 40!f ii.IPtHVIVi/,fNL'N-B(IfL/)JNGS) TvTAL JMP[RVIOUS '\ 176 AC a 9t A"- 0.29 "' 0. 17 A c.. (.;o -16 .... , ' '\ .. '\ '\ ' '\' '\ ' . '\ ·~ / I ---/ / / ~ // ~ = 286/5-;0u R = 50.00' L = 249.80' I I I I I I , \I { _..JV~ '• \:; - "\ \ -\ ' RIP fii,P CH~ " ' ' ' '\ ' ,, '\ '\ ---- - ....... ' ------ ~ 00 L > T 1 LEGtND • 1,> '' < ' ' ' ' v L/li L V.::. t c. I F f f1 ~ .II td V L ' ) I BASIS OF £1 FVA TION Mh_# A-I .211. ii. I lA t RIM tJ~t>:>. 4t IN v UU T = 1-f..::. 'J(1 11 ~- - J A M ... ItA._ tfW _,.. o~:. ~ P r r•.£•~ ,) Jt.! EPHt.. .t: UANf(,)L£ £!£.(../), " U11 Vh1 _£. ........_ lc ·..,JJJ. hE uh '- '--" d.,_ 4i dJWAB.' £ ~4.CI = A&.,UAL - • , I WORT/I C RAPHIC SCALE " ,. j t-- ( IN FEET ) 1 tnch = iO fl. CONTOUR INT~RVAL -2' t" .{: lf. A I!AL T J( ...... I' --... er, P(lr., .ltNr --· -9'_._1.? ~4 R'!!_~~-rll.h._~t tM .. ; 1.0 l L.Jc:~ 1-IJ't -4 ----------.... - + t- b. = 25'52'10D R -447.45' L = 20203' IJt ''!iiGM.iJ a r ' • ----,__ __________ --f £WA#Irt 81. I RLS &:.MM LOT C 4, J .(_ _J(J '-.[If + """"'"lor liLW' • fi[l•~E SUR['IVJSJI}N flUNG N(J .. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~--------------------------------------------j_ ____________ _j[_~J~=-~~~~-=------------_j~~:·~-~2 -~-~PE~JL----~~~~~O~WN~~a~F~VA~I~t~~:_----~' 31/295 FAtLF COUNTY, COLORADO C3 • • 1-0 L 3 T< RAILING @ DECK SCAL " 1 rOWA 39 0 LATT CE .,KIRTING -- PROPOSED GRADE 2'5-() XISTING F'AD 23-0 ::1: w L 8x6 POST '- ' L r L r r __, t'~ t 8x6 POST CD a: .... ....,J~ ::c ::1: 8x8 POST ... 0 ~ " 00 ~ 6x6 POST ~ .... z 0 (.) z ~ "' <') ~ ::1: CD a: w CD ::1: ;::. "' ~ "' <0 TOW-39 ?._ 6x6 POST r r~ 6x6 POST ~ 8x10 POST 2x10 JOISTS DOUG F-IR TOW-34 ~ 8x6 POST STRUCTURALS@ DECK 2 SCAd:. 114 = RAILING E All TO >,IA1"CH UNIT RAiliNG ~ 5 EAST SCALl 114"-1' TRAS~ ENCLOSURE f I I • r-" j_ l MC::CH ACCE.SS ODECKING 35 0 '/4" TOWA L 14-0 ~OWALL 29-0 30 28 26 24 22 20 l ~ ] 18 32-Q -w .. -- 1 r DECK / / + - n.. L PLAN '>CA r 1111 =1' SOUTH SCALE 114 -1' DRIVE ~ -+' TRASH 1 ENCLOSURE l ~ FiLAGSTONE WALK ~, • ' RA "P.ICLO UNIT 6 IN BA KGROUND J f EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE RA LING DETAI $ TO MATCH UNIT RA L NG ~J TO WALL 39-0 TQO CKNG 135 0 114 LATTIC~ SK FT NG TOWAL ADO ' n. F!CI L lawn Llf V.a:11 Community Develoomenl ~uli 'Y:\ liealth rj..C'U •1 Va1101 r y m Pe rmit Sec. 303 (cl1 9 U.B C. 34-() TO WALL 29 0 PROPOSED GRADE ,.,. 6 ~TINGGRAOE rJ \ '. ' '-' \ ··; ::-r granting of a permit or approval of plans and ·->;,:,; s:~z.ll not be construeD to be a oermit for. or an r ~, ;::ny vllllat!Dn of any of the provisions of this coaa ,, G 7h :;r orCJ1nance of the jurisdication . The issu ance of .. u t J.:.scd upon plans, specifications and other data sna il . ~:,event th e building official fr om therea11er requiring th e '"r8Cl10 n of error~ m S~!? B'~nJ , §~@2i\il;il\iQ ns and otner Jata.' 9~ /J-G-~ 1)1\H;. ICJ PROJECT DATbJREVISIO\'S ADD.l SANITARY SE\IoER INLET INV . ELEV. 8215.00 1 1 SLOPE 45' BEND t.AJ W/ MEGALUG RING GROUT SlEEVE GATE VALVE SANITARY SEWER LIFT-STATION 1" = 2° I --I \ \ REV N DATE CHECK VAL 1/E GATE VALVE GATE VALVE CHECK VALVE REVISION MADE CHKD BY BY _,. ADJUST TO GRADE ..,... 1\HH REINFORCED CONCRETE cEVEUNG RINGS 2" MINIMUM AND 8" MAXIMUM MANHOLE JOINTS TO BE SEALED 'MTH "RUB-R-ND<'" AND GROUTED INSIDE AND OUT PRECAST REINFORCED - CONCRETE MANHOlE BARREL SANITARY SEWER UN( INLET !NV. ELEV. 8215.DO GROUT PRECAS" REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE ., • • • 2.00' L / " ' " • L • • • J SCREENED FRESH AIR INLET 8 "' F.G. ELEV. 8218.00 ALU~INUM OR CAST IRON MANHOLE STEPS ClR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM SPACING -12" O.C. MAXIMUM SPAaNG -16" O.C. iON'TROL PANEl ---l--1 SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE +-•'"' ··I NV ELEV. 8210.00 SUMP PUMP CONCRETE PAD 3.00' ( LADDER SEWAGE PUMP LIGHT SWITCH AUTO. SWITCH SCREENED EXHAUST VENT MAIN DISCONNECT SIIHCH W/ PADLOCK L----El<HAUST DUCT 8 ..j 7' COVER MINIMUM TO FORCE MAIN / DISCHARGE GROUT SLEEVE 7~' CHECK VALVE 17 # ANODE (MAGNESIUM) (2) REQUIRED 6.00' MIN. INSULA TED COPPER LEADS W / COPPER LUGS El<HAUST FAN FORCE t.AAIN IN SANDS' -4.00' ___ 2 .00 I ~---------9.00' 10 ----------< SANITARY SEWER LIFT-STATION DETAILS , .• = 2' SEWER LIFT -STATION DETAILS AS ::.HOWN DRAWN BY · Cw<. DATE; AUGUST 16. 1993 GHKD BY JFG APPD BY JFG SHEET OF 2 PLAN NO. 93176\LIFTSTA IONS RIDGE SUBDIVISION FILING 2 LOT G-4 VAIL, COLORADO JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIAlES, INC. COIB.IJNl B«llNEEHH a< LAID SUM'VCRI POST OFFICE BOX 1458 113 NINTH S'TREET, SUITE 214 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 6, 602 30J 945-2550 SHEET NO. PROJECT 93176 ' 200 WATTS 3 ,&50 Lumen& 150 "" 2,600 L PLANT SCHEDULE ... J •• II " to s ENGElf'W!I SPRUCE rtOOOAijrj Jllill PU iiiLD AiO MS"-flilll't' C~ON W'ILO IIOSf_ laJ.M!CAL. !fAll POPI.l.U5 li(Ml,.OI DES ,ICEA EMGEL~NWIS MI~RU$ C~UNIS lUI~ STIIHiiOSU!. lO~ SAYI ' AS REQ'() IEMH.A~ .. IC.IMMIKINHICIC. AAC'TOSTAPHYI..CS UVA Uft$1 I tUSH t I MQ~FOI L ~ItA!. HOlES~ lj l" CAl 8~10 FT 5 "'' SOAL S COAL ALL OISTUAI(P AAI:AS TCI M RUU.OEO WITH HIGH .f\LTITUDf: SUO ~11TU~: POTOMC OACHM.D GRASS o\HHUAJ.. 11£ li.MSS P£1MI f"ltlll PUEMIAL l'f£ liM 55 ""NCMA SMOOTH ll()ft: OUU.R KAAO FE SCll SLUIDEII WAT 1 ~ (loEIQI<T IY \) ISJ I !II Nl 1!11 .... MT£ Of ~PPl.ICATIOM WILl tl 1}6 PUR! LIVE stU$,... AU£, 500 AAUS SHALl. IE Sll.f CAASS ( ~PAATUISI S} 1'\l XTI.ft: IEliW'I A-~ ..... OLAD£ FEAT1lll£A AHI'LICATIO. $Ho\l.l. 1£ SP11.iAP PRIOA TO !.AYUIG OF $00, fUTILIZUI C~SITI~ SHALL 1£ 2:0·20·10 .IJfO S~AO AT A UTE OF lt<l LIS P'£11 I,DOO '5Q..n. Ml TaUS SHM.l I( STM.EO WITH STEfL 1 T' ST.¥.£5 A/010 4U'i£0 w/ 112 (OA.. WIIU., H't'l.C. SU.APPI"' stW.l I( USED AAOt.liO TI.UHK TO I"UVOIT CIRDliMC. Typical .................. / /, / / -- nqpfft,/ /' ... ... tr U.L. Li51ed and Patented Woodform ltghung IJ{)Il$ are U1ldaf>#rrlt~tr~' LabOratort h6ted ''Su1\.abl$ for ...... k)eaiJQnl:'' and .... 80 ~ 81a~.,-cl Height&, s.rt .. 3200 Bollardl (WIUII'IVNI) tOO WATTI . ,no Luman• LIGHTIN -'4 ._,o.! ._.A __ 3055 ,..,,., ..... .,..,, (7) I • , , / _.,. - \ 'J 'C' ' ) 1111 OUt yoaia& WwdForm to pnXIUQI 1he hooot wood ltgh~ avollol>i<l on 1110 morko1 lDdoy. CloUIIod hand joone.y and ----lOCivuqiM--wiUl ~ .. -Col•""""' •-"'-on oncl product Wlal>lo lor 1he ..-domandlng ~and -11Kol_.uooa CN!klrr\18 r.owood vannm e:dor lrom 1'9111 cher oy 01 dar!< mohogan~ Wllan latnlnated In , VII'" ICttpl tr'1tM c:o10r1 combine "' IOI'rn on IIIPOoMg and Old""""'"" ~ maou: Waodforms •• COllltructaO of '-rnlnataj, cenihed kin · dned, Cleal....,....., Ca&ltorn~ rldWOOd ~ IS PN:ed WOftdW<il lor ll& beauty anQ natvral ~ ~ deca.v and 1nac1 anac.ic . To ~,1111~\Q ltw •Mdv aang We opec1ancy of c.ariorrwa rtCwood. we ti'UI aUt~ ptodUCll\llll'llh ctN.r, wt.tefo r~nt NIEOOX·1 'Z' ' • ~-- SEWER SERVICE LINES ---- -------+--- I I r - ... r' '12' ----------- PICAL ALONG PROPERTY LINE • / @l 6' o.c. --------- PLAN NOTES SEWAGE PU~G STATION ,o f>J"' ( - ,._,_ c=;fiv~~~-, ~~fWtr>ti .bbr'~T ~w,.o.,y N'iO ~A.~V? ~L Jilt ~1'-IC,.: r"v~,.., ~" ~1.. PltHP .::JN T-' ~~-~1!&-Y f\"fC~i'.~. (11'-1:-i.Ni~ -?10[-.Jrt .?H <?lit-f'~ ~tr~tf..t1 OA<?t\~ \..I He''? ~ ,..~ MJo..i"' I' e!P ~, i H H'r-f'-1.7VW ~l.::il'i1"'4. ~,.----------------------~--------.r~ -- .... -.. --.. -- wwgg w RIDGE CEVELCPMENT VAIL CDLDRADO -- . -;....___ I ~ I SITE ="" -= 1'1 BUILDING DATA: "? 1"': ~ (..ocJ• ~ • "--~ : 17-71. Co It!" I t-!1lC.'U-? i!:"t I'-M "~(, f'J<Of'f..LTr l,.li'ljO r "-' r-N~ : J' ~ <>-c P.> f :.JHi T ;. ' . ..4· _,. • ., .4-J:;?G.!, JJ :.J r"' -t" . '~ It;>' )( 9 iJt-111"'-' -2~ .;.:: ~· --...._, ' 43 101 Ill' -' ' COPYRIGKI' 1993 BY HAROLD ENGSTROM. AACHITEGT THE liSE OR REffiOOUCTION OF ANV POR'T1(JN 01' THESE PUIHS MAYSE MACE ONLV Willi SPeCIFIC P£1\MlSSION OF HAAOLO EtoGSTRO ... ARCHITECT r ·-F = - \ VICINITY MAP ·- FORCE MAIN IOTA:~ ---,, \ l AN 0 S C APING S Y M B.O L S (E) LAAGJ:; BOLDER .AREA l-E) ROCK OUTCROPPING (E) ASPEN (N) DECIDUOUS (N) CONIFER.OUS (N) SHRUB -SINGlE PLANT -MULTI-PLANTING ( /" ~' ----) -~--- ...._,_,__) c: ) r•· . ' l-~ J)x r·. ' ' . '-_., _) REVISIONS BY ~ u.j'::~jqz., ~' ~ :"/IJ./'9b ~t .&_ B/'1/'1~ +le I D,.AWN c~o~•ct<•c 'ATE 4 :o/"1~ F acAt..• 1 I=--2o ..JD. NO. '1'So:, aM81ET /R OF ~ SHEET.