HomeMy WebLinkAboutINNSBRUCK MEADOWS COMMON ELEMENTS PART 2 LEGALTO: MIKE McGEE
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: 4/=a
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: _4.-aZ.l. 6t t do_..*._.-h
/L T/4'' e e.af \ oroa-
a/*-"'--,- h.fu:IF';"-l .h .;Y* -4'</"'<c'<-''11
o* ,{-Engtneering:
Reviewed by: Grerl- -t<\d, rhrci Date: cr,cr.$., zg\, \$K
Comments:
Lots \ror(\ 2- L(\f\r6\ YrO\e COrelOEel- ufir..
lS
-
ernP\c\<e \ic\\)g\\(\ oc\ :J\te
=3emole cc'te. ck)c:..>\ ir(-rr1 o\\o'."t
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:Date:
Gomments:
/- I"v*?tLL*
,rtl L-*-L
? t) 0-L
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Dale:
ODD OPPENHEIM
Town Planner
,..
Distributed to the Fire Department, public Works, and Landscaping on j//4
.
I
I
l"r, -l
t
TO: MIKE McGEE GREG
ZGD P.*nr.(tn^;6L'
l1,t ot *.<s ,ot<.<l s .
. &r.- I
TODD OPPENHEIMER
R6tum lo
a
HALL
BRfEFDESCRIPTTONOFTHE PROpOSAL: G.u1 Ar,,rl*,
lno,- noLu.! tk n-.*"L q "4uu .-L ,,.-
Englneorlng:
Rovievyed by:
Commenls:
Reviewed by:.4.<;nzi
Landscaping:
Rovlowed by: _ Dals: _
Comments:
Firo Dopt.:
I'zo.?4Date: '
cdmments: ) 7'7;Z d-firr6,-2r 2>?E 'a?
/<, ,d/.r//.r?../rv 79' a-"r'fi/. ,
") F,,u ll7u"o' ' 7'* V'e ;Psr 84
Dlstdbutcd to tho Fhe Department, pubfic Workr, and LendscdrE
y'r'2 "YrrJ
DATE SUBMITTEU
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
l r"'L u6-*^-Lj ".-f
Date:
Date:
. ii,
Sr-ji?'
.:".'ij:
Landscaplng:
: MIKE McGEE
DATE,OF PUBLICfiEAFING
Dlstrlbuted to the Flre Deputment, public Works, and Landsca
' TO: MIKE McGEE
Plr-._
enilnf,[{'l'
Reviewed by:
Comments:
GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andy Knudlsenffi
PROJECT:4\'L rlt
DATE SUBMITTE}DATE PUB EARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:Pga'.|,f fr.", fl-f /s,LOqE
/ t'(\
/,t fI ." //u.n n.y',w.t,
rzaft. r (o-tc l, a( d/\,t^-,r\,...t tJ €a
Sa-l' Crr.-.-I
Date:.(Aq ia/
:r i"*i,)":3t1
(t"n^t' if li r-,y'u'r. 4a a4_r / /V-lt * y'tl?tt-,-/
Landscaplng:
Reviewed by:Dato:
Commenls:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by: . -4:"J c'..-:Dale: ?' ?'?'tt
T;:":*:.';" :'o .,::: ::;::;/"4' *.- * :::' / /'*- rz<<'(
. -A - ,- n.g,-o t-4 -
,:arno,r.or,.n'J t' 1z'" k -/ "t ' " nno 4; '1' ? '4"" '1r /4.i.,,".ny' VtVf'cl/ '
Distributed to the Fire Deparrment, pubric works, and Landscaprng on
I
,{x
s.fl
T
.ri
:1
I
I
'.{..
,j:,q
']w;l
TO: MIKE McGEE GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT:ftltt.
Landscaplng:
Date:
Date:
Date:
I
Distributed to the Fire Department, Public Works, and Landscaping on j//[
.
DATE SUBMITTED: ?/T( DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING S O/TT
COMMENTS NEEDED BY q/sa
BHIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE pROpOSAL:
-t ot *. / 6lrl Xo. "nor-.
//-. arrX4: r.---/ a.t44 c.a+t . .. ...* 11( -; tq l-ztc!.. .i,,,
a 7r-''t',-.-.-* 6 z^l) ,t-1 ,t / ( d',ffir# "o,,fl .ft , :! * <-/''o"'"^t v6 r-L*-
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
|'{t,,lgl,,e
DATE RECEIVED BY
COMMUN ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICANON FOR
MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
CHAPTER 17.20 VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE
(4 OR FEWER LOTS)
(please print or type)
APPLICANT
MAILING ADDRESS PHONE
B. PROPERWOWNER
OWNER'S SIGNATU
MAIL]NG ADDRESS PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (stroet address)_
FEE $2s0.00
F.
BLOCK-_- SUBDIVISION
D.
E.to request a meeting with the zoning administrator to assist the
PAID CHECK #DATE
meeting the submittal requirements and to give the proposal a preliminary
review.
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The applicant shall submit three copies, two of which must be mylars, of the
proposal following the requiremenls for a final plat below. Cerlain ol these
requirements may be waived by the zoning administrator and/or the planning
and Environmental Commission if determined not appticable to the project.
2. A list of all adjacent property owners (inctuding those behind and across the
street) WITH COMPLETE ADDRESSES sha[ atso be submifted. tn addtuon,
submlt addressed, stamped envelopes for each of the above.
3. Title Report verifying ownership and easements. (Schedules A & B)
4. An environmental impact report may be required as stipulated under Ghapte, ,tl *18.56 of he zoning code. '1"-
5. FINAL P13T - REOUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURE:
(Some ot these requirements may be waived.)
The subdivider shall submit four copies of
shall be mylars, twelve copies of the final
additional material as required below. Wilh'i-n thirty days of receiving the
complete and conect submittal lor a final plat, the zoning administrator
shall cause a copy of a notice of the time, place end general nature of
the hearing and proposalto be
a:t teast tneen days tio-r tostrfIDrins.IY
Also,
l"/c-
notified in writing at least seven days prior to the public hearing.tlL
B.
c.
Final Plat - Staff Review.
The final plat shall be circulated to and revierved by the town's deparlmsnb,
including, but not limited to Public Works, Transportation, Community
Development, Recreation, Administration, Police ?lg m€ Fire Dspartment. WComments and concems of these departments will be forwarded to the pEC
prior to lhe public hearing.
Final Plat and Suoolementarv Material - contents.
The final plat and supplementary material shallcontain the folloring
information:
1. The final plat shall be drawn in India ink, or other substantial soluilon, on
a reproducible medium (preferably mylar) with dimension of twenty-fouJ n ,
by thirty-six inches and shall be at a scale of one hundred feet to one oV
inch or larger with margins ol one and one-half to ttvo inches on tre left
and one-half inch on all other sides.
:
2. Accurate dimensions to the nearest one-hundredth of a foot for all tines,
angles and curves used to describe boundaries, streeb, selbacks,
alleys, easements, structures, areas to be reserved or dedicated for 241public or common uses and other important teatures. All curves shall be U"
circular arcs and shall be defined by he radius, central angle, arc chord
distances and bearings. All dimensions, bofr linear and angular, are to
be determined by an accurate conlrol survey in the field which must
balance and close within a limit of one in ten thousand.
North anow and graphic scale.
A systematic identification of all existing and proposed buildings, unils,
lots, blocks, and names for all streets.
Names of all adjoining subdivisions with dotted lines of abutting lots. lf
adjoining land is unplatted, it shall be shown as such.
An identification of the slreets, alleys, parks, and other public areas or
lacilities as shown on the plat, and a dedication thereof to the public
use. An identification of the easemenb as shown on the plat and a
grant thereof to the public use. Areas ressrved for future public
acquisition shall also be shown on the plat.
A written survey descripti_on of the area inch.rding tho total acreage to the J(nearest appropriate significant figure. The acreage of each lot orparcel
shall be shown in this manner, as well.
A description of all survey monuments, both found and set, which mark
th€ boundaries of the subdivision, and a descdption of all monuments
used in conducling the survey. Monument perimeter per Colorado 6lLstatutes. Two perimeter monuments shall be established as major
control monuments, the materials which shallbe determined by the town
engineer.
A statement by the land surveyor explaining how bearing base was A<determined.
A certificate by the registered land surveyor as ouUined in Chapter 17.32
of this litle as to the accuracy ol the survey and plat, and thal the survey
was performed by him in accordance with Colorado Bevised Statutes 6(
1973, Title 38, Article 51.
A cglifieataby.an-aUoney admitted to practice in the State of Colorado,
cr4cgqggte ll!9jF"g,that the owner(s) of record dedicaring ro rhe 0l_publicmFpub|tc-nghf-of-way, areas or facilities as shown thereon are
o ----I
\ty
dL
0-r
3.
4.
/6\II- |
II J.'
6.
0tL
7.
9.
10.
11.
the owners thereof in fee simple, free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances except as noted. (See example in Chapter 17.32)
12. The proper form lor approval of the plat by the,PEC chairmaqand
acceptance of dedication and easements by thb-8dffi6il rm-signature
by the mayor and attestation by the town derk. Examples are found in o'<
Chapter 17.32 ol this title.
13. The proper form for filing of the plat with the Eagte County Clerk and ^yRecorder as per example in Chapter 17.32.
14. Certificate of dedication and ownership as per example ln the appendix.
Should the certificate of dedication and ownership provide for a
dedication of land or improvements to the public, allbeneficiaries ol 6/<
deeds of trust and mortgage holders on said real property will be
required to sign the certificate of dedication and ownership in addition to
the fee simple owner thereof.
15. All current taxes must be paid prior to the Town's approval of plat. Thls
includes taxes which have been billed but are not yet due. The
certificate of taxes paid must be signed on the plat or a statement lrom d<
the Eagle County Assessor's Office must be provided with the submittal
information stating that allta<es have been paid.
16. Additional materialwhich shall accompany the final plat induites, but is
not limited to:
a. Complete and final environmenlal impact report if required by lhe ty'4
zoning ordinance;
b. Complete engineering plans and specifications for all
improvements to be installed, including but not limited to water , ,
and sewer utilities, streets and related improvements, pedestrian n/^
and bicycle paths, bridges and storm drainage improvements;
c. Maps at the same scale as the final plat showing existing
topography and proposed grading plan (contour interval
requirements same as pretiminary'pfan), a landscape and or +&
revegetation plan showing locations, type and sizes of existing
and proposed vegetation.
d. A map the same scale as fre finat plqldele&S aq.,biSh€n{
moderate avalanche hazard areas,d-ortv percen-Bfnd high sto$
areas and one hundred year flood pffi
hazard ordinance of the Vail Municipal Code;
l)e
q<
e. Title insurance company proof ol ownership of all lands within
the proposal; t'r c'rr r€rr r\r- r'rrrrrl' 6v
: L Copies of any monument records required of the land surveyor in. accordance with Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, Tifle 3g,
Article 53;
g. Any agreements with utility companies when required; 6.(
h. Protective covenantrs in form for recording; a* *Ji. Other data, certificates, affidavits, or documenb as may be ,,/.required by the zoning administrator or pEC or council in the
enforcement of these regulations.
j. lf this application requires a separate review by any local, State
or feOerit agency other than the Town of Vail, thaapplicatio n ,/
fee shall be increased by 9200.00. Examples of such review,
o-u
may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Departnent of
Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paylng any pubtishing fees
which are In excess of 50"/" of ths applicaflon fse. lf, at the
applicant's request, any matter is postponed for hearing, causing
the matter to be re-published, then the entire fee for such re-
publication shall be paid by the appllcant.
Applications deemed by the Community Development
Department to have significant design, land use or other lssues
which may havs a s'rgnificant lmpact on ths communlty may
require review by comultanb other than town staft. Should a
determination be made by the town stafl that an outslde
consultant is needed to rsview any appllcation, lhe Community
Development Department may hire an outslde consultant, it shalt
estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and
this amount shall be foruarded to the Town by the appllcant at
the time he files his application with the Community Development
Department. Upon completion of the review of the application by
the consultant, any of he tunds lonraded by he applicant for
payment of the consultant which have not been paid to the
consultiant shall be retumed to the applicant. Expenses incuned
by the Town in excess of the amount lonrarded by the
application shall be paid to lhs Town by he applicant within 30
days of notification by he Town.
THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
SEEING THAT THE APPROVED PLAT IS PROMPTLY RECORDED W]TH THE EAGLE
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER.
rttLd l0l2/'|
APPLICANT
MAILING ADDRESS
B. PROPERTY OWN
OWNER'S SIGNATUR
MAILING ADDRESS
(,il
DATE RECEIVED BY
coMMUN lry pEVELop MEI!r pEpARl$1Nr
APPLICATION FOR
MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
C}IAPTER 17.20 VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE
(4 OR FEWER LOTS)
(please print or type)
pnoNe 863-o23L
, 863-oz3z
c.
3-5D.
E.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
LorI--l---BLocK
-
suBDtvtsroN
FEE $250.00 PA|D cHEcK *-7398-qe
The lirst step is to request a meeting with the zoning administrator to assist
applicant in meeting the submittal requirements and to give the proposal a preliminary
review.
F. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
The applicant shall submit three copies, two of which must be mylars, of the
proposal following the requirements for a final plat below. Certain of these
reguirements may be waived by the zoning administrator and/or the planning
and Environmental Commission if determined not applicable to the project.
A list of all adjacent property owners (including those behind and across the
street) WITH COMPLETE ADDRESSES shafl atso be submitted. tn addltlon,
submlt addressed, stamped envelopes for each of the above.
Title Report verifying ownership and easements. (Schedutes A & B)
An environmental impact report may be required as stipulated under Chapter
18.56 of the zoning code.
FINAL PLAT - REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURE:
(Some of these requirements may be waived.)
a. The subdivider shall submit four copies of the final plat, two of which
shall be mylars, twelve copies of the final EIR (if required) and any
additional material as required below. Within thirty days of receiving the
complete and correct submiftal for a final plat, the zoning administrator
shall cause a copy of a notice of the time, place and general nature of
the hearing and proposal to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the Town of Vail at least fifteen days prior to said hearing.
Also, adjacent property owners to the proposed subdivision shall be
notified in writing at least seven days prior to the public hearing.
"\8s
T'
B. Final Plat - Staff Review.
The final plat shall be circulated to and reviewed by the town's departments,
including, but not limited to Public Works, Transportation, Community
Development, Recreation, Administration, Police and the Fire Department.
Comments and concerns ol these departmenb will b6 forwarded to the PEC
prior to the public hearing.
C. Final Plat and Suoolementarv Material - contenb.
The final plat and supplementary materialshallcontain the following
information:
1. The final plat shall be drawn in lndia Ink, or other substantial solutlon, on
a reproducible medium (preferably mylar) with dimension of twenty-four ' .
by thirly-six inches and shall be at a scale of one hundred feet to one
inch or larger with margins of one and one-half to two Inches on the left
and one-half inch on all other sides.
2. Accurate dimensions to the nearest one-hundredth of a foot for all lines,
angles and curves used to describe boundaries, streeb, setbacks,
alleys, easements, structures, are*; to be reserved or dedicated for
public or common uses and other important features. All crrves shall be
circular arcs and shall be defined by the radius, central angle, arc chord
distances and bearings. All dimensions, both linear and angular, are to
be determined by an accurate control survey in the field which must
balance and close within a limit of one in ten thousand.
3. North arrow and graphic scale.
4. A systematic identification ol all existing and proposed buildings, units,
lots, blocks, and names for all streeb.
5. Names of all adjoining suMivisions with doiled lines ol ah.rtting lots. tf
adjoining land is unplatted, it shall be shown as such.
6. An identification of the streets, alleys, parks, and other public areas or
facilities as shown on the plat, and a dedication thereof to the public
use. An identification of the easements as shown on the plat and a
grant thereof to the public use. Areas reserved for future public
acquisition shall also be shown on the plat.
7. A wriften survey description of the area including the total acreage to the
nearest appropriate signilicant figure. The acreage of each tot or parcel
shall be shown in this manner, as well.
8. A description of all survey monuments, both found and set, which mark
the boundaries of the suMivision, and a description of all monuments
used in conducting the survey. Monument perimeter per Colorado
statutes. Two perimeter monumenls shallbe established as major
control monuments, the materials which shall be determined by the town
engineer.
9. A statement by the land surveyor explaining how bearing base was
deiermined.
10. A certificate by the registered land surveyor as outlined in Chapter 17.32
of this litle as to the accuracy ot the survey and plat, and that ths survey
was performed by him in accordance with colorado Revised statutes
1973, Title 38, Article 51.
1 1. A certificate by an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Colorado,
or corporate title insurer, that the owner(s) of record dedicating to the
public the public right-of-way, areas or facilities as shown thereon are
12.
4,?4
the owners thereol in fee simple, free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances except as noted. (See example in Chapter 17.32)
The proper form for approval of the plat by the PEC chairman and
acceptance of dedication and easements by the council with signature
by the mayor and attestation by the town clerk. Examples are found in
Chapter 17.32 ol this title.
The proper form for filing of the plat with the Eagle County Clerk and
Recorder as per example in Chapter 17.32.
Certificate of dedication and ownership as per example in fre appendix.
Should the certificate of dedication and ownership provide for a
dedication of land or improvements to the public, all beneficiaries of
deeds of trust and mortgage holders on said real property will be
required to sign the certificate of dedication and ownership in addition to
the fee simple owner thereof.
All cunent taxes must be paid prior to the Town's approval of ptat. This
includes taxes which have been billed but are nol yet due. The
certificate of ta<es paid must be signed on the plat or a stalement from
the Eagle County Assessor's Office must be provided with the submittal
information stating that all taxes have been paid.
Additional material which shall accompany the final plat includes, but is
not limited to:
a. Complete and final environmental impact report if required by the
zoning ordinance;
b. Complete engineering plans and specifications for all
improvements to be installed, including but not limited to water
and sewer utilities, streets and related improvements, pedestrian
and bicycle paths, bridges and storm drainage improvements;
c. Maps at the same scale as the final plat showing existing
topography and proposed grading plan (contour interval
requirements same as preliminary plan), a landscape and or
revegetation plan showing locations, type and sizes of existing
and proposed vegetation.
d. A map the same scale as the final plat depicting all high and
moderate avalanche hazard areas, forty percent and high slope
areas and one hundred year flood plain areas as defined in the
hazard ordinance of the Vail Municipal Code;
e. Title insurance company proof of ownership of all lands within
the proposal;
f. Copies of any monument records required of the land surveyor in
accordance with Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, Tifle 39,
Article 53;
g. Any agreements with utility companies when required;
h. Protective covenants in form for recording;
i. Other data, certificates, affidavits, or documents as may be
required by the zoning administrator or pEC or council in the
enforcement of these regulations.
j. lf this application requires a separate review by any local, State
or Federal agency other than the Town of Vail, the application
lee shall be increased by 9200.00. Examples of such review,
13.
14.
15.
16.
b\.b
may include, but are not limited to: Colorado Departrnent of
Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees
which are in excess of 50% of the application fee. lf, at the
applicant's request, any matter is posponed for hearing, causlng
the matter to be re-published, lhen the entire fee for such re-
publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Community Development
Department to have signilicant design, land use or oher issuss
which may have a significant impact on ths community may
require review by consultanb other lhan town staff. Should a
determination be made by the town staff that an oubide
consultant is needed to review any application, the Commun'rty
Development Department may hire an outside consultant, it shall
estimate the amount of money neoessary to pay him or her and
this amount shall be lonrvarded to the Town by tho applicant at
the lime he files his application with the Community Development
Department. Upon corqpletion ol the revielv of the application by
the consultiant, any of the funds loruarded by the applicant for
payment of he consultant which have not been paid to the
consultant shall be retumed to the applicant. Expenses incuned
by the Town in excess of the amount fonrarded by the
application shall be paid to the Town by the applicant within 30
days of notification by the Town.
THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
SEEING THAT THE APPROVED PLAT IS PROMPTLY RECORDED WITH THE EAGLE
COUNW CLERK AND RECORDER.
4
a
ORDINANCE NO. 1
Series of l99i-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TOWN OF VAIL MUNICIPAL
CODE BY THE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 17.17 SCHOOL SITE DEDICATIONS;
AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
HHEREAS the Town council of the Town of vail is of the opinion that the
subdivider of'l and in each major residentia1 subdivision or portion of a major
subdivisiori which is intended for residentjal use shall a'l locate and conveysites
and land areas for schoo'l s when such are reasonably necessary to serve the
proposed subdivjsion and future resjdents thereof;
N0l'l THEREFORE be lt ordained by the Town counci'l of the Town of vai1,
Col orado:
Tit'l e 17 of the Town of vail Municipal code is hereby amended by the
addition of chapter r7.L7, School Site Dedications, to read as follows:
17.17.010 PURPoSE
It is hereby declared to be the po1 icy of the Town that whenever there is
a major subdivision, which is subdivided for residential use or partial
residential use' the owner of the Iand shall provide land for school needs
generated by the proposed residential use. It is the purpose of this chapter to
require the dedication of'l and or the payment of fees in lieu thereof or both to
ful f i'l I such needs.
Section 17.17.020. school land declication or cash in I ieu thereof.
The subdivider of land in each residential major subdiv.i sion or portion of
the subdivision which is intended for residential use, shalI allocate and convey
sites in 'l and areas for schoo'l s when such are reasonably necessary to serve the
proposed subdivision and future residents thereof, by the application of the
formu'l as set forth be'l ow:
Single family and dupiex or primary secondary.
Number of units x .014495 = dedication requirement .i n acres.
Mu'lti-fami1y.
Numben of units x ,002676
l,lhen I and i s dedi cated for
be that vrhich js useab'l e by the
and shall be maintained by the
= dedication requirement in acres.
the purpose of providing a school site, it shal'l
Eagle County School 0istrict for such purpose,
School District in a reasonab'l e manner until
developed. Said'land shal'l be he]d by the Town of Vai'l for the School District
unti'l required by the School Djstrict, In the event that the Schoo'l Distrjct
determines subsequent to dedicatjon that the dedicated schoo'l site js not
reasonably necessary, the Town council may, at the request of the school
Di stri ct, se'l 'l the 'l and.
l.|hen sites and land areas for schools are not reasonably necessary to serve
the proposed subdivisjon and future res'i dents thereof, the Town Council, with
recommendations from the Schoo'l District and other affected entities, shall
require, in 'l ieu of such conveyance of land, the payment in cash by the
subdivlder of a amount not to exceed the fu] 'l market value of such sltes and land
areas for schoo'l s.
The ful I market va'l ue shall mean the current rnarket value of unimproved
land. This va] ue shal'l be set annua'l ly by the Town Council on an acre bas.i s with
recommendations from the School District. The same va'l ue per acre shall be used
throughout the town.
If the subdivider does not agree with the value per acre, the subdivider
may submit the report by a qualified appraiser who.i s M.A.I. designated, which
establishes a new value. The Town Counci'l shall review the report and determine
if the value is reasonable. Based upon their review, the Town council will
determine the va] ue of such Iand.
l'lhen money in lieu of land is required or when monies have been pa.i d to the
Tovtn Counci'l from the sale of such dedicated sites for schoo'l s, it shal'l be held
by the Town CounciI for the acquisition of reasonably necessary sites for the
construction of school facilities, fon the construction of employee housing
required by the schoo'l district, for the purchase of employee housing units for
the school district, or for the development of such sites. If housing units are
purchased, a deed restriction restricting their use to school d.i strict employee
housing shall be required and ownership shall remain in the name of the Schoo.l
District. A subdivision school dedication sha11 apply only once to the same 'l and
area. Dedication shall not be required of re-subdivisions of the same'l and on
a dedication that has previously been made.
Section 17.17.030. Town Exempted.
The Town of vail is specifically exempted from the requirements of this
chapter 17.f7.
Section 2. If any
of this Ordinance is for
part, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase
any reason held to be inval.i d, such dec.i sion shall not
-t-
affect the validity of the remaining p.rrtions of this 0rdinance; and the Town
council hereby dec'lares it wourd have passed this Ordinance, and each part,
section, subsection, sentence, crause, or phrase thdreof, regardress of the fact
that any one or more parts, sections, subsectjons, sentences, crauses, or phrases
be dec'l ared i nval .i d.
Section 3. The Town council hereby finds, determines, and decrares that
this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and werfare of the
Town of Vail and the inhabitants hereof.
Section 4. The repeal or the repear and reenactment of any provision of
the Val'l Munlcipal code as provlded in this Ordinance sha'l 'l not affect any right
which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the
effective date hereof, any section commenced, nor any other action or proceedings
as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or.repealed and
reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or
any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
section 5. Repealer. A1 | by1 aws, orders, resolut.i ons, and ordinances, or
parts thereof, inconsistent henewith are hereby repealed to the extent on.ly of
such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any by1 aw,
order, resolution, or ordinance, or part hereof, heretofore repeared.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND APPROVED ON FIRsT READING THIs .!ggh day of
Februarv , 1991, and a pubfic hearing shalI be held on this ordinance on the
_ day of ,1991, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council
, Co'l orado.
of Februarv , lggl.
ATTEST:
INTROOUCED, READ, AND APPROVED ON READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHEDby tltl.e only this
SECOND
5ttr day of March ,1991.
Chambers of the Vajl Munjcipal Building,
Ordered published in full th.i s lgrh
Vai l
day
Rose,
\)rt-)
Cl erk
Rose,
I
ATTEST:
-3-
ORDINANCI NO. 2
Series of 1d5T-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL BY THE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 18.67 VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS;
AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
NOl,|, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOt,lN COUNCIL OF THE TOl,lN OF VAIL,
COLORADO:
1. Tit'le 18 is hereby amended by the addition of Chapter 18.67 to read
as f o'l 'lows:
18.67.010 PURPoSE
The purpose of this Chapter is to proV.ide the procedures necessary to
implement the provisjons of Artic'l e 68 of Title 24, C.R.S., as amended.
18.67 . O2O DEFINITIONS
A. Site specific deve'l opment plan shall mean and be'limited to a final
major or minor subdivision p1at, or a special development district development
p'l an.
B. Vested property right means the right to undertake and complete the
development and use of property under the terms and conditions of the site
specific development p1an, and sha'l I be deemed established upon approval of a
si te specific development plan.
18.67.030 NOTICE AND HEARING
No site specific development plan sha11 be approved by the Town Council
or any Town board or commission as applicable, untiI after a public hearing
proceeded by written notice'of such heari ng, in accordance with Chapter 8.68
of the Vail Municipal Code. Such notice may, at the option of the Town, be
conrbined with the notice for any other hearing to be he'l d in conjunction with
the heari ng on the site specific deve'l opment plan for the subject property.
At such hearing, persons with an interest in the subject natter of the hearing
shal'l have an opportunity to present re] evant or material evidence as
determined by the Town Council or Town board or commission as app'l icab'l e.
18.67.035 ACTION FOR APPROVAL OF SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN .
CONDITIONS
The action of the Town Council or Town board or commission as applicab'le
for approva'l of a site specific development plan sha'l 'l be in the same form as
that required to approve any request being considered for the subject property
'i n conjunction with the hearing on the site specific deve'l opment p1an, such
action being either by ordinance, resolution, or motion as the case may be.
If any action by any board or commission is appea'l ed to or ca] 1ed up by the
Town Council, approva'l sha'l I be deemed to occur when a final decision of the
Town Council is rendered approving the site specific development p'lan. The
approva'l may include such terms and conditions as may be reasonably necessary
to protect the public hea'l th, safety, and we] fare, and the failure to abide by
any such terms and conditions may, at the option of the Town Council or Town
board or commission as applicable, and after public hearing, resu'l t in the
forfeiture of vested property rights.
18.67.040 APPROVAL - EFFECTIVE DATE
A site specific development plan sha'l I be deemed approved upon the
effective date of the approval action relating thereto by the Town Council or
the Town board or commission as the case may be.
18.67.045 VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS . DURATION
A. A property right which has been vested as provided for in this
chapter shal] remain vested for a period of three (3) years. In the event
amendments to a site specific development plan are proposed and approved, the
effective date of such amendments for purposes of the duration of the vested
property right, shalI be the date of the approrral of the ori ginal site
specific development p1an, unless the Town Council or applicab'l e board or
comm.i ss1 on specifically finds to the contrary and incorporates such finding in
its approval of the amendment.
18.67.050 NOTICE OF APPROVAL
Each map, p1at, or site plan or other document constituting a site
specific deve'l opment plan shal'l contain the fo'l 'l owing language: "Approval of
this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title
24, C.R.S., as amended." Failure'to contain this statement shall inva'l idate
the creation of the vested property right. In addition, a notice describing
generally the type and intensity of use approved, the specific parcel or
parcels of property affected, and stating that a vested property right has
been created, shall be published once, not more than fourteen (14) days after
approval of the site specific development plan in a newspaper of genera'l
circulation within the Town'
18.67.055 EXCEPTION TO VESTING OF PROPERTY RIGHTS
A vested property right, even though once established as provided in
this Article, precludes any zoning or'l and use act'i on by the Town or pursuant
to an injtiated rneasure which wou'l d a'l ter, impa.i r, prevent, diminish, or
otherwise delay the development or use of the property as set forth in the
site specific development p'l an except:
A. l.lith the consent of the affected landowners; or
B. upon the discovery of natura'l or man-made hazards on or in the
immediate v'i cinity of the subject property, which hazards could not reasonably
have been discovened at the time of site specifjc development p'l an approva,l ,
and which hazards, jf uncorrected wou'l d pose a serious threat to the public
hea'l th, safety, and welfare; or
C. To the extent that the affected 'l andowner receives just compensation
for al'l costs, expenses, and liabi'l ities incurred by the'l andowner, including
but not limited to al'l fees paid in consideration of financing, and all
architectural , planning, market'i ng, legal , and other consu'l tants fees incurred
after approval by the Town council, or applicab'l e town board or commissj on,
together with interest thereon at the 1ega1 rate until paid. Just
compensation sha'l I not include any diminution in the va] ue of the property
which is caused by such action.
D. The estab'l ishment of a vested property right pursuant to law sha'l 'l
not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in
nature and are applicable to a'l 1 propert'i es subject to'l and use regulation by
the Tovrn of Vail, including but not limited to, building codes, fire,
plumbing, electrical and mechanjca'l codes, housing, and dangerous building
codes, and design review guidelines.
18.67.060 PAYMENT 0F CoSTS
In addition to any and a'l 'l other fees and charges imposed by the
Municipal code of the Town, the applicant for approva'l of a s.ite specific
development p] an shal 1 pay all costs relating to such approval as a resu.l t of
the site specific development plan review including publ icat.i on of notices,
pub] ic hearing, and review costs. At the option of the Town, these costs may
be imposed as a fee of / a'n
18.67.065 OTHER PROVISION UNAFFECTED
Approval of a site specific deve'l opment plan shall not constitute an
exempt'ion from or waiver of any provisions of this code pertaining to the
development and use of property.
18.67.070 LIMITATIONS
Nothing in this chapter is intended to create any vested property right,
-3-
but only to inplement the provisions of Article 6g of rit'l e 24, c.R.S., as
amended. In the event of the repeal of'said Artic'l e or judicial determination
that said Article is invalid or unconstitutional or does not apply to home
ru'le municipalities such as the Town of vai1, this chapter sha'l I be deemed to
be repealed, and the provisions hereof no longer effective.
2- If any part, section, subsection, sentence, c'lause or phrase of this
Ordinance is for any reason he'ld to be inva'l id, such decisjon sha'l 'l not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council
hereby declares it would have passed this 0rdinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phnase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be
dec'l ared i nval i d.
3. The Town council hereby finds, determines and dec'l ares that this
0rdinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and we'l fare of the
Town of VaiI and the inhabitants thereof.
4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any prov.ision of the
Municipal code of the Town of vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not
affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that
occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any pnosccution commenced, nor
any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by vi rtue of the
provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision
hereby sha'l I not rev'i ve any provision or any ordinance prev.i ously repealed or
superseded un1 ess expressly stated herein.
5' A11 bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency.
This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution,
or ordinance, on part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED 0N FIRST READING this s*r day of
March ' 1991 , and a public hearing sha'l I be held on this ordinance on the
Lgtt- day of March , 1991, at 7:30 p.m. in the counci] chambers of the Va.i I
Municipa1 BuiIding, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in fu1l thjs 5ttr day of
1qq1
ATTEST:
-4-
Q,.rtt, l,&u,r,,a^,. . .
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Cl'erk -
INTRoDUCED, READ, AND APPRoVED 0N SECoND
bg 1r+l/ thLf this tqd day
READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
of tllttJ<, , 1991.
ATTEST:
-5-
ISTOPHER DENTON KELTON 4'.792452
'
P. g1
CsnrsropHER DpNrou
Kplrow & Knrqpnll
' REAL + ESTATE
Q03)+t*t994
- l- tI-9*
(Includes cover she.et)
(303) 47&7990
Vait, ColorEdo E1657 tl?-476-7q90 r^x tOr-476-7W1
T4AR-11-1994 16:1? FRON
EISTOPHER
DENTO}{ KELTON TO o
Msrch
479243? P.A?
10,1994
36{DEolmtr
Kancer Ctty;!t[O. 6,f109
Rc: Connid Abccrr Eaccmcnt on Sontlwcct
Corncr of InnrDruck Meedmn Site
Ihrr Bill:
Thir lcttcr ilito iodt*,. my refuml of your countcrpropoerl regrrding thc
rbove common hcce$. I rm not wllllng to pry for ery pewment or cernont
withln yout trirting pEr*ing rpeoes nor rrn I rilling to cxprnd prir crirting
perking |]sl to rccomtrodrte dr crrl
I .i
Slnce thr oti$nrl pruporcd cnsemcnt wsg not rcceptlble to yor4I fatro trtan
actlonr to Furue rn rlternatlve rtte plrn rhlch will ec6s att homeg fum the
Innsbruclr Mcrdows ctte. Ibb rltcrnrflvc wlll cost thc proJect vrlurble time
(3F15 dryr)r but it tvill not rcquiru rny ftrthor negotietionr regrrdtng.n
cr;Gmcnt- I rrlil bc lcavtng thc rcutbwert corilil of thc InntbrucJs Mcrdows
sib open u ln the originrl prnpocal rr r gaturc of goodwilt end to
eccorrnrodltl the fthtre rogcst needs CIf the netghboring propcrty mners Thc
uso of thlr lrnd vtlt hevc to bc ncgadrtcd througb thc dcvclopcr or thc
homeomcdr a*rodation rvtcn thc nood rrlrq but undt ttrat tiue it tdll be
trcrt€d u pit*r-b propcrty.
.l
:
My originrl:proponl wer very fair md rcssonlblc" I msde all parder awrre of
the boncfitr of tbb proporod common rcolrq, rnd of the potentirl lirbtlltler
should theiropoml not be lmplemcnhd. My propoc*l to p*y forthcfircenglnc
tumercnnd lnd the 22' wille 17O lonS drlverry wlr more thrn gsneruu* Tbe
hct t[rt t3% of trc proporGrl comnon lscrolt drlvcmey wes to be lOcetcrt on
InmbrutkMcrfuwu slte srys alot ebout how much the dcvclopcr rrr rllllng
to cooperrte *tth the nelghborc to clcrr up l non*onforming prrHng siturtlon
rnd r cmftilr1t crrc of trcrprc on prtvrte propcrty.
'.
I em putdngthb bil ln your court Any future rttempg to eolvetgg rcssri
and partbg probhms rrllt bsrc to bc rvorkod out rith your adJecart
neig[borrrWert Ridge Condoninirru I never needed rcoes,s thnugh your
property rnd probtbly Bhould never htye $lcd. Im sorry thlngr dld not wor{r
ersroPHER
DENToN KELToN r0
CnrusroPHER DenroN
Kerrox & KnFIoTLL
4'79245? P.A3
REAL + ESTATE
(303) 476-7990
ChristophmDntilr Keltm & IGndall R.B.
(303)17c79%
isTf gs OF TE colrf.rcJ ffiafJ or0 lEr ,rlD
lEg Eridte gtroct Voil, Colorodo 81617 ?O7-476-7t90 r,rlt 803-476'?991
rt tr
MAR-11-1ee4 16318 FR0t',l
usroPHER
DENToN KELTEN T0
Df#h),rwtlnWEWroTrto*t':
Pf6str afi)ftsAl -
479245? P.E4
,Q **rter ?fr
,'
:
.i:
semEt t tof oF
ALE sp ffi gnEW
:,'t
-le irrSnn ,t 't^tt'6;*ets7rfu't ,PF'lilttt (DAd unuo
BE SCAt161g; -ffre p1r;,Me e Err'Jfr',rle aesiOeucg al
: ,
'l
ht 7, t, Vn"J|ilraaouftn;r, ,s JE M
7P -lurnl tmlr-o uEedQE rrE sllfist fia'e SlJfrnf
t-r
'l-;,T&n/ltatntt As Snrarl il trl Paoft.lyi/', /fl6 lc/c0lt rjog,io
btfrr$ flt,y'rll uiooinm 7a ,hy,, nr,trr.l fi{fuer'J/l7
a^, ftf,rforlJ f rrF ZfrrtVgtttz tiqlrxrr" siq ruf fW
To frl tintwf Uttut Al9 ..[uri,t
rrl'rlr- t k Qe*€ h,r,f|Gr Fe.-.
N$6TJfiRJ i>,
Irt ArtAu{p{, Wg Afitrit)0 lefilil,nwioc
ot€rr" woE isttr fito Ntr n
Nc oF 7rto, vt€ .D€veIoNE or.Ttpslutc,c, Nq**, frE atftM
: . - a -.,JJVIt Xrrrlet C$rtu Net At irr€r6;i;iu7 to nn# ourtlt?; F
#nai*- Eica Fwc
hrouq, $ ruita
r il.baq fffr,,',$t
Peituu€rtlilr ( vi,
*hr€nrT€W
br J,
MRR-49-1994
I
aeta6 FRoH
Facsimll* Gover Sheet
To;
Conpony:
Phe:
Frx:
From:
Compo4y:
: Plffis!
flx;
Xlde:
Pagpc $ent:
CHRISTOPHER DENTO.I KELTON TOo
CnRrsroPHER beNroFi
Ketroru E KExnnll
REAL '} ESTATE
(303) 476-7e90
479?452 P.S1
CJrristopErDentmr Kelton & Kendall R.E
Vsil, Colorado 816t7 303.4?6-7990 pAx ?07 416.T104
t4AR-69-1994 AE!46
Grcjort
2tt Bridgc
Vr[rCO,
CI]RISTOPHER DENTON KELTON TO
Durdopmcnt
64100
4792452 P.A?
Re: Commoll Acces Errcncnt on $outhwgl Concr of Inncbruck Mcailorr $ite.
: : :':. .
ncrrAndyl'; 1;,;'
Ttrc src rrifu! !b confrrm thrt rc hrve rwlcred tho drawingS for t[c oonuon
ru*rr rlrivo lb-reryicc Wcst Rlrlgc Condurrlnlumlr, thc Errwie rcddencC rnd Unltr
#2 ild #t hrrbnrck Mcrdowr rnd rppmvc of thc prcporcd conccpil. wc till bG
wortdng wtlh ttc devdoper, Greg Anrdcnr to crerte r mutudly acccptrblc aelcucnt
for tblr congbrt rccclr. Tte rrld drivrmry wlll be conrtrnr:lerl of prvF.fimt Or
eorurfG rlililr|l n6ct tho$rtenderdtGil$lbhd by thcTown of Ydt holic
Wodn Dcp ,t itd n t O"pt . ftc cott and mdntcnrncc of thc commcn rcccrs driw
rhall bctrcfifciupondbillty of thc undcl$pd ptopetty owncrs.
TOTFL P.A2
Xor& Albright
r.lRR-11-1994 ISTOFI-IER DENTON KELTON
rac
rgEGGd thrt JGI Fritr' $ill,ru Holden,
lol t5€. Yail. folorado {hercinefter 'cnrrs.
as thc ftrGblscrsl aake thc bcleu deseribed castcent Ierost
(.t ttai i Intcsorr$taiq DctclopF€nt iutrdivilioa, faa
iagrcaa ead rgrecr for slc by Vail
oE thcir lrtigficc!:
l, !loe* t of Yril latrrrnat i.
coraEr ot EaElG, strto of Solorlgo.rtc 1$trcdfrrtr ar.crt!.C ar toll'cr:-
SIGtlEr
5\
tmR-11-1994 16:19 FR0l4
.4f,flGt!*la '!rsh
,, lt .c hrclt |'srd t'|at td'l Frltr retrnq aa.r Fattt.rr
iJ. tlr* i.Frta: lrtrtr*rr.rrlp of Jorl itltrr Tillres 49166-,. .fd f,.*r=i,
tj*tra, E, lS. '.'ril. Sclorte r*rr th. b.t.r dxeri*{ 6*(-*r:
.€iao|r lct tr $l*l S. '.'rii ::iaari-frt-tr. :)sirc: aitiat i'.=41?iE1.:a. :9--
rtfcbr f p|ilUflr Loerccr d rgr.ri fd rre Ly'-'rll lnt.rErllt ir.
:
&Eirtct ot tldt:asiltrc:
ji ,, ', il Fe*ie. of lst I, llocl 3 af tE il tnt r$r'.:Arno-tl(f,rtot a*r{tdtlo, ffiBt ol frlc, stitc of
Eililrrh. $s. l*iltcot|rlt rlcrerlb+d *s !st!=rs:':
i,:: Er{irni&l .L l.h }xUr lbrL L\rrDer gf s.la:tiii,; , tbF:c ?!-!O t..t Io a Sas?.}rrl'y d,irccr-t*, alan6
ttrt ir* u-*rryoc lag I t/o tD. sf,tbGrsBar!' crnr of |.nd tat lr tlHtcr ?0 !cr.- is r rt'ctcrl,1'
dlrccttcr rlilt th stlr mrF/ of sriil tnt,ll
thrrcc il . rtarighr liE to r tpilt uhrch llar' 6 ttra sEtDrs Dcdrr of sattl lot I .rd i.r !3 fect
ir| | yc.tarlf dfl'etfo ftcr thc lEtDdrt c{tl|ert
tJr3ca 20 f.et ln I Gart"rly dircctjca ].e thi
rcrttcrrt xra*tr th lrttlt of bttnie.
Sl&Dr
S rit=.
' i - ;l..r^-
4792452
t l.,t
MRR-11-1994 16.2A FROM ,IISTOPHER DENTON KELTON TO
.'
' ,1. ,
',3f7illl
ti )
rrnn or BG,rilE 1.-o*i utcrl
r. It t Ct.t '.|l t|t frr":f!!C E,lillEilirriirtr$
t.tHR-l1-1994 tEt?A FRO|'I ISTEPHER DENTON KELTCN TU
fir?ara
rrrf grtqn. Iq- r Gtlr Il
_ Dt- -- - G rEr trl!t|lrt.ar:'
lliG i* tilri:
tfiR-11-1994 76.?t FROM
frsroPHER
DENr0r'r KELToN r0
CHntsroPHER DENrohl
KEt ton E Keuonll
4'.792452 P.@9
' REAL + ESTATE
G$)n6-7990
Chrirtophor Dc'lrton lGlton & Kcndall R.E.
t.lr4itt thu
IPfurntlr.
l8E Bridge stre€t
wiu PEIfD TD (oAlslilrtzf A
illlfil"f,it-Ff,y;wi,il,l"l?,{lP
rElr.l
Htrrra T,E
rJ;'"iii;.| rfr''ffi*ff;,,.*, r*:'#, jr'
^,o0|, lrr Lr'rtw* 4 U*;" Irowerw,^tirorb 6* ,tw Tttf
a , r:ft .rrrurrs 'oeperpt tJev prry CorrgoJ ,r.to ,rw lht,
ee$aarcr) 'r 3l ,lrirs r lrtl T*rt ,;; ;r; n Zi/wW
Nweus/ ^gi n FiE erl hittg wtrpnmtrtO"
r i:, , t ..ispwenata, rrr* M tr w (*o * fu$*o-.
$;.r,cf nt sirt is v€q ietV, Tf it !eo1 drny fi*r'.: : ,
fooitbil,/. ,'atrope1}tfil wi* gF ptEEDQ to, Acbrwnt{
t
Pemet ot t ht Z*onilu(, tlnw,rt .frf, tttr ui* tnvt::
10 ?At cilGwr)r rtht*r (At/ll€ ,,. rrilficlf ru nn^, w
| :i : ,
/.tirL Pfsr c, 70 TnE mWq adear N*twElJ lA*1' ,' ' -(t' :
$#s*tp E'1,
{'
TilET/E c€{/,tiefita)T.
::,
.:lt
t4 tor ftn nTnrF/
Tne Ti*r; n t/rL nrt cwo&nrt fr
upDnsnrtos THM tiipt iutio{r,.,
Ar if StL FFFI. 'i{frf Jati uuuir wifl 11+g ar't'&i&iil'flL
D,nr6q li: I r?rn!/ {gclrr Hamlt_..
".
;v- ,,4 an Eilcffi!?' a L"gfn, 0F f,pptw+L at rr cuno*li,,:ffiH$t Enfii,eiF tren, fun- nCv,N NO b*hWsfiu.
1 , i':J uiu rc qW n Dficns, ttrs ist r dtn lfia Cou^ttc\ ,
-Otr UUe r,r'ff ,t1r,3 tflTr?t #fry vr+arc p Pra1i6cr atl
#r',iffi,i*TJ;#;ff;i"';F
-&i
Ar''#' i*hn
fn nu'ltt{ nyi' furO,tu ,'Tfr''s ,.fr'=*6^sqf*V
ie Trt * t/t;, Fo* n€ wrcniilF Trl.r 6,rrrc,u
Foiso F Dr pnntrr. (-,*., Hn,,srrD. I? f
C#rrr afnr'rt ltli rnciftrtl u&prrr,np tf 6rlo tn ftl,
?lonOc nhl', J rrrulf ilr,f fi€ Ptor&f $nu nnuUl
THt Prrl*rro hnnisbtt Fcr- wilsm silr ftAh)
A?MAfiL, h' ffin7 oF A ilfs, Tnw ty nsiim
PlettDh)t 'P€rr,r E ry ioiirtt trw ot, rF
Coami Accgtff .
'':
:'
7 w t€ tttnln nf:
ril,ll 7:?oFsL Etr
?tw*l, 9: b nfi q ru0rl
iu Jo:fr*l SI-
??4JZirPl,ln cTi-
by 41b-7s90
,4?1. fw,
- fff- zr+L
lrr,*.^ iqe flo
CIRIST(FTCR EEIIT$I KE-TctI rc
9r'g
.l*,t
-j--*
-1'--\ \fl\ \-
I
?O{
;s
;fi\l
\
,\+ Xl\tF
ffR-11-r9* t6:!4 FFIL. $RIST0PFER EEIlrSl lGLTtll To - 4'€J4Sl P. 13
._ . .--;;4. -* .; -.. f"" - .:::f :..:
,{lQfiAltDS E!\lGl}rEtit5, t,\lC. ,,,..or'o'.,;.-_}2, ri . iS..,. _.. , .i eir).:trf. oalI Fi|I:If. Oal
'.1 : ." :'*iiitiilT' ,l,i'.,.. !^*,.Aliy-/:L/*Ef--.. -.--etnr.i l\D.ltr,rirr . :. a-',; e.nr.. rsrrt{t.lllt . -,i
r I t'i
. lrt. rli !a,7..jft I | 'r"l#7'fi J
il ,fri,#i.i:{ i-- 1 1i.."
fr,trN:i.i'':\;-n'nr' Ii r'- \"tivl
.lr. t s.tlltct ,r.A ,rf, lc.flI .Y.. e.q /tl Zrj5:,'2 gtipg l'lt*-.11". ,li ,ill -'"o ,lil
" , l];,] \\,..,*.*-.\*--'rni,..ll'Jca'rrlL.,*1-3-' ll* '-r'r{l ' "''
ll.tilI rh r
lr*l j i I
"! l"t"r i I/'cttTrrT , f l.ht :l
t'i
I
,t'-i.i1r 4
a'.r-ti7 ;5-
/ztttctrl'$, , ll$t it
,;;i',4o'ri+4<,v. 'l-i :i , :; l-ti I:l n....-.. -. , ,_ ,\, l:
r. l.' \
tl lt t* rt't"n*t tr
:
'-11 t.* li y*tt -,{.v n.4ttsa,s.ir.v
$l i_t t ' a;;"';;;;ii', I: bhi,t lt 'quaiti'::iii ' I
' Iti . - | fE rrt* ,t, lor I
ttr|Itl t 'liiiit
, -l '5i
!l*.i 'i i' qtfiil- '#i'!#{Y
-\*'\*nro.-,^ i.ii I Ii'w+$gy ut,"p,,tr*
\r$: {f\ h-'----' I !\ ""}*'t'*re.ol"* f- --
E \ *,'ii' .: ;,,i.t,.X;'*,*,,; i- -' - ji
'.t' \ r14-t 7' )' "'
'i
STOPHER DENTON KELTON TOf4RR-11-1994 15:25 FRo'lfrfr or-t,ir'r u,/F+,
,%rr
\,i
,l
ld
o"i
'r*
I ''.
\.tsr
iceg
F\t,:
()l
'.t
.i
'4,
:
t'
/J'llt:f.il*
ndn!.\ftJ'L',lil i
B,
,8{
7
E
l'r iiEt'lt5t\ -I\ Vl\,ilt\t
'fi1
'',iiiii
, t,
!tiiri
j/i
Ii
'l
riti!!It
il
lt.
I
t
It'
,, ,r'' itl
:
ir.
;': ,:i. i.;,
1'i,::
.J
l,rrr
r.)
q)\?,i
f'f,
('l -
ilt
.to:l-{
u2a
N1.ib ,'ri1I t,,1"'3 ii].1u:fi ;:ii:"'i5t) i'j ()
::Eis:'{
iii[,jru
" -i :.-1tf
'J;I
t'1RR-11-1994 16:25 FROI4
tisroPHER
ENroN KELT0N ro 4?9245.2 P.15
DcrrAndp
Wc en wtdrg tb confirn thrt we hla revlcn d tto dnwtngl for ths cornon
acccu drlvo totdndar Wctt nid3c Condou|rlunt thc llowic rtridocs'rrd llnitr
#D ud #4, Innrbmck Mcrdmw rld rpprvtr of ttc prcporcd corrccD,t Wc wlll bc
worldng rvill tho rtcvdoperr Grcg ADdGq b crcrle e muturlly rcccptrblc c$cmcnt
for tbb connor rccGrf. Tbe rrtd drlvsrrry rlll bc coffitrustcd of plrnncnl or
cotcrlO? md rhrll ucat thom rtradrdr cablbhort by thc Town of Vrfl Publlc
worfsDopA'fnd FiroDcpt. fhc cortrrd netntcnrnccof tlo comnoo ircffi &firc
rhrll bc ttc roh ircponcibiltty of the undrntgldl propGrty orncn.
If vur hrveuri quertions, donrt baltrtG t0 crll G$S Anrdcn rt 47G19n.
Gtqory Mi Anirdl : Rrprucnhtirr for Inrdtr L lodotto
zttBlfdSFgtrt3..t
:
Yrn, CO. tlCf,t
GsryD, Roffit
126l Oerrfrrnt#G
Ir$rnr Dcich, CA. ,2651
6{109
RorB.Albr[ht
TETAL P.15
it .\
March 10, 1994
Andy Knudtsen
Department of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 South Fnontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: CommonAccessEasermentonSouthwest
Corner of Innsbruck Meadows Site
Dear Andy:
We are writing to confirm that we have reviewed the attached drawing for the
oommon accesg drive and the fire truck turnaround to senrice \tlest Rifue
Qgaflsrniniurns, tJre Howie residence, and units #2 and #4, Innsbruck Meadows, and
approve of the pmposed concept.
We ane wiling to work with the developer, Greg Amsden, to create a mutually
acceptable eagement for this oorn"non acsess. The said driveway will be constructed
of pavenent or concrete and shall meet those standards established by the Town of
Vail public works department and the fire department. The cost of the oornmon
acoess drive, the fire tmck turnaround and the Howie parking spaoes shall be the
eole responsibility of the developer, Innsbruck Meadows. The maintenan@ of the
Howie parking spases will be the responsibility of Howie.
If you have any questions, don't heaitate to call me at 81d531-5933 days or evenings
at816193l-5424.
PfCCI flAR I S tg-U Sincerely, / /f=tu
Bill Howie for Ann Howie
3600 Holmes
IGnsas City, Missouri 81109
BILvII
Enclosur€
oc Gregory Ameden
\\-,A-!;\\,j\lMRR-18-1994 14:38 FRON CHRISTOPHER DENTT}.I KELTtr{ TO
?
eItr,co{L,rrrr(9J<t G)r-<;()TIEF9apIul,rc /:N
'
!+
ill
,
-\fh
ls
ln
Jrla'oor\o\T.-
I
{ st*F;|8"fi
l{l,s iv. {Eo r..!
ffi/21./94 L2:.2'7 CENTAIIR CTRFTRFTITN ,
=r=oT,?211?,..," ..
l'1AP-14-t99.1 l?tSB FRil crntSTqlt-ER DE.tTtl.r KELrON ,r0
.',; |".t
i4488297@6328 P. A3
Ady Erdam ; : .1 M[ri s r99l
c/o Dqt of Cungd$ SwCopneot
TorwnofVtll
T6SorelLtnlrlsnodvrl'c0.tt6sr , ,:,
:
Ru coonon Aaltl D'ruluot on sodhrcct coracr of hrrtme& !fiedorn gra.
DcrrAndy: '
wc rrrrniltu li conmn tr* wr hru-a nvir"d tho drrrhp for 6. ooolerrcc.n drtrG to r.ri'ha w*r nlhr cennoubiuq rtc Eotdi rc*dcrc* ril u[i|$# T! f+ nn*itmt ffrdomLC .n-r. * t WpooA corc6 WG t il Dcvortrt;fll;frq dor&gc' crqerr* to enrti r iuarly rciluur clrcnottbr otr Goqrot rolr* Thc nll driycwrl mi[ bc cor{ncbd olpruar mmcrctl ud ${_nast &orc 4-',r-r& jhttrrtc,f hy thc Ton if vd Dublcworb Dryr- ud nrr Dryt- trc co.t rld uhtoorair of thc colno rm driv:rhd br |to tr{c tsncrmtey of tLc urdnrlnrd prrpcrry emcrl!.
If you hffG rry qrirdonr, d0r'f hcdhlB t0 crt CrrtgAndc[ rt.f?G?f00.
Cr$ory M. Ar{&r . n4ilfrilitrl frr Jrrtr 1 pcdoso
?tf &i|grth.r
Yrllrgo, tt{$,i' ,
:
;
t,,
I
i
I /
i'1FR-B?-1994 16:51 FR0t'1 CHRISTOPHER DENTON KELTON TOo
CnrusroPHER Deuron
KelroN E Krxpall
479245? P.01
O )rt ^..,*q,t -j'lD f
REAL + ESTATE lhlw-tbt'rv(
(v- bb
/
lM',^ ((
' 14il/\r'3
|
\rfur
.ffi-
^,v
6
X'acsimlle Cover Sheet
To:
Companyl
Phoner
Xbxr
Frum:
Conpany:
Ptone:
Frx:
Datcr
Pages Sent:
(303) 4767990
(3031416:ln4tnt* _
'0icludcs correr sheet)
Dent(n Kclton & Kendall R.B.
kt
LN
, a'^- b
ZJ<
208 Brid6c Sttcct voll, Colorsdo E1657 702 176 79W vxTo?"176-f$l4
HRR-A?-1994 16:52 FROM CHRISTOPHER DENTON KELTON TO
. Plrt Rctrtcslons . O
L All csnstRrction slrall conftrm to the standards li*ed betow and shall comply with tho building SotPdnts
shown onthe rttacbO{sife plrn
2. Thcre iltst bi r mtntmunl t5 fbot separEtion bctwocn structurcs, inctuding alt decks 9d cantllevered
portions, but otcluding crtru. enu compldion of first strudure and prior to thc applicstiohftr an
ioUsequintU"itClng pdnnit, the applicant-rnust provide stvey information vui$ing th'e location of pteviously
built gtructurcs to slro* ihet the 15 foot rpantion rcquhcmcnt will be met.
3. Thc belght llnrltadon ftrtre dcvelopmcnt on thls parcel shall be lowered tom rhe 3E ftet atowcd by LDMF
zonirg o 33 fc$. :
4, All drivowaln to bc rxrl*4ugted on this rhe shall aot excccd 8% dopc.
4t9245? P,A?
o
CLASS RO.W. PAtfED - SHOLII,DER DBSIGT'I IYIAX
WIDTII WDfiI SPEED GRADES
MIN.C'IJRTTE
RADIUS
FUTU8.E
ADT
Artedel
(FrontNgp)
Collector
Local
Minor
(Privatc)
Drivoway
70
50
30
40
I
4
t
2
I
650
250
50
50
20
6
7
I
9
I
50
40
30
30
750 and owr
300 - 750
rjo - 300
0-150
5. GRFA and site for the structuis as follows:
t. '. t:i ts0nt rf,t r.tL t.llo r!,lL l6ll|r,tr
r.n 4tF{ f,..
MAR-A?-1994 16:52 FROI4 CHRISTOPHER DENTON KELTON TO
i,l I O
.;
6. No fcnces rhall bc atl, ytrtd on this property.
7. Phasing - TtE app[cac Sdt prwide the cmployoc housing units according to thc pttases shom bclow.
A Prior to issusnc€ iof a fnal CO or TCO for any of tlre first sh gtructurcs constuoted in Innsbruck
Yof*q thc appticart shall secrrre a final CO orTCO folthc first of three dccd rstri*cd mptoyee
houeing units fu1this dlwelopment
B. Pdort0 issance;ofiirut CQ or lCO for ary ufthc sevenththrough tcnth strudffis mrutuuaod in
Innsbruck lvl€ad&va the applicant shr[ scerrrt a fual Ct or TCO 6r rhe socondofthr€e depd rostrictcal
crnplryoc houring:uilits for this dadopnrsnt
:
C. Prior to issuanseiof ftial CO or TCO for any of the clcveirth thmugh fourteenth stnrcturcs oonstnrcted in
lnnsbruc,k Mcadolirsr the applicurt shau s€curc r firul CO or TGO tbr the third of thr€e de€d r€sfitctoal
ernplopc houginC unils ftf tlris darelopruart
::
::
l}re lrire Deparmrcnt add Public Works Depanm€ilt hrw rwieryed the proposal and.supliort the pfioj€ot with the
following conditioru:
Firc Dcprrtmcut
'I. Thelircaco€sicssd€ilt:mustbeddincdmdthcnrccordedattheEagleCountytJcrkrndRccordapriorto
DRB approral of any drvdling unit. Thc caseinemt nmt bc postcd in ile tetO 'r"itn Wo lartirg" *gru,
4?9245? P,E3
2. All drivomy sr"Anpo mr* bc nall uraatlcr ddviat *rbccrr.
3, Hydrant(s) rnust borlnsrllod accordirg to fown of Vail rtradmds.
hbticWorlu , .i ,,':' :
:
3. All drivervays rnrst 4lgn at r 90 dcgrec anglc with
1, Detailed regrading tind'lindscape plarn for the sidewalk rnd right-of-way area mudi:bb provided to the DRR
hearing ftr any dwe[ingunirs. 1'5g loxm r{qgipcer is reguiriDg4idewallg; curbs, gutsr, storm scwcr, inf )
eneinecriof, drawiagg a*Uor f,radinc plurs to be proqidcd by thd dEveloier. Tho Torqm Enginccr rrry a[bffi-a
ditch with detarhcd ddam$ but ncds additionAl infunrationfu velifr that this dccignwill firnction
'road side ditches, ctc.. piorto eDRB
Dtivc.
L'/surJa'z-
o
COPYFIL E
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
Department of Community Developrnent
March 3, 1994
Mr. Greg Amsden
C/O Christopher Denton Real Estate
288 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
RE: The Pedotto rezoning proposal
Dear Greg:
Congratulations on the recent unanimous support from the Planning and Environmental
Commission regarding the Pedotto rezoning request. The next step is the Town Council
review of the proposal. This requires two readings. The first is scheduled for March 15, 1994.
The second is scheduled for April5, 1994. On the afternoon of March 1sth, the Council is
scheduled to go on a site visit to the property. Please have it staked no later than noon on
this day.
In order to stay on the schedule listed above, please have the following items to me no later
than one week prior to firsl reading.
1. Please provide written approval from the neighbors on lhe southwest corner of
the site. Their approval should state that they have seen the drawings for the
common access and approve of them, that they will enter inlo access
easements for the common access, and that they will participate in paving the
area.
Revise the site plan with the updated sidewalk design. I understand that since
the drainage along Kinnickinnick will be handled in a curlc and gutter system,
that the sidewalk will be shifted closer to the street. I believe Todd
Oppenheimer recommended a separation of 5 to 10 feet.
Reorganize the site plan information, deleting all information from the previous
survey that is no longer relevant. The site plan should be titled "Site Plan - An
Exhibit to the Innsbrook Meadows Plat'.
Add the revised restrictions to both the site plan and the plat.
3.
4.
a
Mr. Amsden
March 3, 1994
Page Two
5. Please have Rick Rosen draft language for the phasing. I believe we all have
the same goal in mind but I think it will be best if he language comes from your
attomey. The goal, as stated in the hearing, was to have each of three
employee housing units finished with each phase of the project. lt is tho intent
of statf to have the first EHU completed along with the first six dwelling units,
the second EHU completed with the next four dwelling units, and the last EHU
completed prior to the issuance of a TCO or final CO for any of the last four
structures on the site.
Thank you for addressing these issues. Please give me a call if you have any questions
about them.
Rick Rosen
Andy
FfLI
built that is there today.
Jeff Bowen stated July '1, 1994 and then open space.
Diana Donovan and Bill Anderson stated that this property should remain as open
space.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that there seemed to be a consensus that the qualifier
should be removed from the document and if the qualifier stays in the Open Lands
Plan there needs to be a date.
Diana Donovan made a recommendation to the Town Council the PEC's strongest
support the adoption of the Open Lands Plan and that the qualifier does not need to be
in the document. Jeff Bowen seconded the motion and a 7-0 vote approved this
request.
A request for a worksession for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle
WesULots 2 and 3, Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
0trF y
10.
11.
Applicant:
Planner:TABLED TO FEBRUARY 28, 1994
Bill Anderson made a motion to table lhis request to February 28, 1994 with Jeff
Bowen seconding the motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this item until February 28, 1994.
A request for a minor subdivision and lo rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located ate850 Kinnickinnick Fload/more
specifically described as follows:
A Derc.t of tard h the Southweg Ouaner ol Sedio,r 14, Torynshp 5 South, Range 8l Wg6I ol th. 6lh Prinsipd Meddbn, mo.. Fnbubrly d3scrbd rs
lgfgbr:
Beginnlng d . poinl rhoncs . br.$ c.p s.l ior a wlnes3 comg.lor the We3t Olrdsr of s.ld Sectlon 14 bo.t3 (Nodh Z€ dsg|€€! 28 mlnul€3 5l locqldr
W*L tOiS.OB tgst Deed) (No.th a3 D€grc€s t5 mind€! 02 seconds W'gl 915.96 teet Mo$ured): Ths.c. Nonh 7r dagloe3 05 mhut6 19 66c(rtdr E r'
i0,76 trd; Thcnce 183.62 feot along the erc o{. cir e to the dght which.re slbl.nds. chord b€sing North 88 dEgrr93 1? mhut€s 30 lgconds Ea8t,
18t.76 te€t: Thoncs South 7? degrg$ ,lO minut€s 2'l Eeconds East, 62,77 lssi: Thrn6 147.€ tg€l dmg th. .tc ol r curvo to tho l€i whlch .tc lubtendt r
dlod be. e Nonh 8Ei dggrcc€ 36 mint.(es 17 3econ& E.3t. t45.60 tesl; TheE. Nonh 70 degr.e! 52 mhuto3 55 geco.& Er| a0e55lest Thncs 5{.10
fo€i atong th€ erc ol a cu e ia tho igt{ wl**t erc stbtends a chord bardno Soulh 47 degrg€6 20 nlnules 37 seco.dr Erst 44.i'0 ls€l: lhenca Soulh l,l
degrGc! 25 mlnu€r 50 soconds Wesl | 10.51 leol:
Th€nca Sguth €8 de9.e6 l8 || nule€ 9l seconds West, 320.m kel
Thenc. Norlh 19 deteo.07 minulG 05 loconds W.Bt, 50.CD teet;
Thenc. South // deg.eeg 48 minulos4l soconds WEsl, 160.18leeli
Then6 Sosth 10 degrrG 53 minulC3 33 g.conds W63t, 36.48 f..l:
Thenc. Nonh 87 dsgree. ,10 minul€r 06 soconds W9|t, 337.72leet;
lh.nc. (North 1 t degreeo 52 mhutc8 13 reconds EG! t 3O.m l.et o€ad) Nodh '11 deg.!.r 55 mlnulgs 3l $oonds Ead, 129.75 iert M 3ur.d) to the
POINT OF SEGINNIT{G.
B6.ring t,om G.L.O. recod tor Soqth hef ol Sedion line betyo€n Sectbnr l,l-15, (G.L.O. record Soulh 0l deg€$ $.2 mlnut.r El|t) (Solnh 0l dogt c. 38
|nhdor 32 secondg Easl Me.surod)
Walter Kirsch
Randy Stouder
Juanita l. Pedotto
Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO FEBRUARY 28,1994
Applicant:
Planner:
Bill Anderson made a motion to table this request to February 28, 1994 with Jeff
Bowen seconding the motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this item until February 28, 1994'
Pbnnlng rnd Envhonm.ntrl cotnr{aalon
F.bru.ry t4, le9a 16
F!LE
Greg Amsden said he disagreed vehemently with the proposed additional conditions
regarding employee housing units were excessively restrictive and that even if lhe
applicant found units that are being rented to employees now we would benefit by
permanently restricting them for such use in the future. He felt the additional condition
reduced housing for guests.
Jeff Bowen stated that other proposals create employee housing and the Town
encourages this and that the Cornice Building should be handled in the same manner.
He wants to ensure that housing is created for employees.
Tom Braun stated it would be dilficult to create three additional employee housing
units. He said that wherever the employee unils are created, the Town would benefit
from the permanefit restriction of these units.
Bob Armour stated it was important that the employee housing units be located in the
Town ot Vail.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that a minimum ol two units, providing at least three
bedrooms, would be the criteria lor the employee housing units.
Bill Anderson made a motion to approve the establishment of a special development
district for the redevelopment of the Cornice Building with the four conditions contained
on Pages 13 and 14 of the staff memo and two additional conditions that the building
height be limited to 33 feet and that the employee housing units must be a minimum of
two units with three bedrooms and two kitchens. Allison Lassoe seconded the motion.
A 5-1 -1 vote approved this request with Dalton Williams opposing per the reasons
stated above and Bob Armour abstaining.
Jeff Bowen requested that his comments concerning employee housing be forwarded
to the Town Council.
A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2t50 Kinnickinnick Rod/more
specifically described as follows:
A prc8l d hnd in the Soulhw.sl Omdo. ol Sedion 1,1. Too,nshF 5 South, Rrnge 8l tlvosl ol th€ 51h PrincipC M.tidi.n, mot€ p.rticutuly d.tr.bsd et
lolo*s:
goglnnlng .t . polnt frhsnc€ I tnass c.p set lor . whness comEr lor llF Wesl Ouanor ot sdd Sedion 14. bearg {Nonh 29 degtgg8 28 mlnule3 5l fecondi
W9st, lO73O8la't Deod) (Nonh 43 Degrs€s 15 mlnde6 02 s.conds Wail, 915.96 iool M€suledl: Ihence Nodh 74 degrg€s 05 mlnutsl 19 iacodr E.g.
10.76 tsrti Thence | 83.62 leet along the |rc ol r cude to the nghl {hich r€ subrenG a chod be..ing Nonh 88 deg€6 12 mbvte! 30 glconds Est.
181.76 l.€t Th.nce Sourh 77 degre.s 40 mlnutos 21 s€conds E.51, 62.77 le€l: Thenc. 147.43 teet .long lhe .rc ol . qrrye lo lhB lelt whlch .tc ErJbl€nd! r
dtod bs.rlng Nodh 86 d€greer 36 mlntneg 17 seconds East, 145,60lesl; Thonca Nonh 70 detrees 52 minules 55 s€conds E.st, ,16.55 t?st; Thmce 5[.10
fod along the rrc ol a curvs lo the dght whlch arc slbtends e c-hord bedng South 47 degree6 20 mlnutes 37 seconds E|sl 44.20 l99l: thenco Soulh 14
dggrse! 25 mlnuEs 50 sgconds wesl | 10.51 terl:
Thsnc. Soulh 68 degre$ 18 minules 9l seconds W63t, 320.m tesl:
Thrnc. Ngdh 19 de9r.o6 07 ninulB 05 gocond3 W6t, 50.00 lo9l;
Thanc. South 77 degrees 48 Dlnuta3 41 s€conds West, i60.'18 leot;
Thonc. South 10 degre€g 53 minutes 33 seconds Wosl, 36.481€61:
thenc€ Nor$ 87 deg999 40 mlnut€3 06 ssconds wesl,337.72lodl
Th€n6 (North l1 degresg 52 minutos 13 seconds EGt, 130.00leet De.d) Nonh I I degreer 55 minltB3 31 Eecgnds Ea3l, 129.75 teot Ma.3ur€d) lo the
POINTOF BEGINNING.
8€|ring lrom G.L.O. r6cod lor Sodh halt ol Sec,tion line behyeon Sertions 1+15. (G,L.O, recod Souih 01 degres! 30.2 mintn€! Elrt) (South 0l dsgreo! 38
mhules 32 .econds E.sl Meesu,ed)
Plannlng and Environm.nlsl Commlatlon
F.bruary 28, 1g9a
CCIP Y
6.
Applicanl: Juanita l. Pedotto
Planner: Andy Knudtsen
It should be noted that Greg Amsden stepped down from the PEC because of a
conflict of interest.
Andy Knudtsen made a presenlation per the staff memo. He stated that statf was
recommending approval of this request to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density MultFFamily and a minor subdivision with the six conditions
contained on Pages 1 1 through 13 of the staff memo.
Rick Rosen, legal counsel to Greg Amsden, stated that he would be making the
applicants presentation rather than Greg to avoid any possible conflicts of interest. He
stated that the architecture within this project was consistent. He stated that this plan
will improve access for adjacent property owners. He stated that the applicant will not
be able to comply with Conditions 3 and 4, Pages 13 and 14, of the staff memo. Rick
said they would like Condition 1G reworded so that they do not have to come back
before the PEC until the first unit has been built. He asked whether the phasing plan
could be reworded so that the designations of specific building footprints are omitted in
favor of number of structures. He also asked that decks be allowed to be closer than
15 feel aparl.
Benji Amsden stated that they were proposing to clean up the stream area and make
the area available for access by the residenls.
Kay Cheney commented that she did not see an advantage of massing two units
together.
Jo Brown stated that she was in favor ol duplexes as opposed to a "lot of cookie
cutters" type units.
Greg Amsden stated that they are looking for a development with a variety of
structures.
Jo Brown stated she still has concerns about the road cut on Bellflower.
Rick Rosen pointed out that road cut currently exists.
Bill Anderson stated that he disagreed with staff's position regarding Conditions 3 and
4 conceming the clustering of units and combining driveways and said that he agreed
with the other conditions of the staff memo. He stated he agreed with the slatf's
interpretation concerning the need for a minimum '15 foot separation between- struclures and decks.
Benji Amsden stated that it would be difficult to incorporate this condition into the
project at this stage and that they had been working with 20 feet.
Plrnnlng lnd Enylronmentd Commlsslgn
F.brury 26. lee4 10
o
Bob Armour stated that a minimum of 15 feet separation should be required between
structures. He said that this proposal seemed to blend nicely with the existing
neighborhood and was in compliance with the Land Use Plan.
Jeff Bowen and Allison Lassoe had no further comments.
Dalton Williams stated that Conditions 3 and 4 should be omitted from the PEC's
approval of this project and that he did not favor curb and gutter but would defer t0
slaff on that issue.
. Kay Cheney stated that the gutter that has been installed along Basingdale has been a
positive improvement to this area.
Dalton Williams stated that the requirement for 15 feet minimum separation was
reasonable.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she agreed with the 15 foot requirement and that she
would like to see the driveway for Building Envelope 1 moved closer to the intersection
in order to increase green space.
Greg Amsden stated that the Town Engineer would need to approve such a change.
Benji Amsden asked the PEC for additional input concerning future shifts in fooprint
location for this project.
The PEC did not have a problem with staff approving changes up to 10 feet.
Kathy Langenwalter made a motion to approve this request per the staff memo and
added that the PEG would like condition 3 omitted. Condition 4 should be changed to
require a reduction in the amount of pavement. She said that garages would be a
minimum of 480 square feet and that a minimum ol 15 feet be required between
buildings. She continued and said that staff could approve relocations up to 10 feet,
that the phasing language be changed to reference total number of structures, and that
condition 1b be changed referencing the timing of surveying for building locations. Jeff
Bowen seconded the motion and a 6-0-1 vote approved this request with Greg
Amsden abstaining from this request.
7. A request for a major CCI exterior alteration for the Laughing Monkey to allow an
addition to the south side of the Creekside Building located at 223 East Gore Creek
Driveia part of Tract A, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Jose GuzmanPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
It should be noted that Kathy Langenwalter stepped down from the PEC to represent
the applicant for this item.
Pllnnlno and Eryhonm.r d Commi$lon
F.brutry 28, l99a 11
'l
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Plannino and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
DATE: i'12 nce Nonh t9 d€grees 07 minules 05 seconds Wesl. 50.00 teel:
S"4E?fiifues 4t soconds W€s1, 160.18 leel:
,/4rufhenc6 Souih l0 degtees 53 minues 33 seconds Wesl. 35.,{8 fe€l:
p1.,,lxruea:ffi1..:1?",iHll'?3l'l3lriil:o""olHonr,',o"n,"""55minul$3t
seconds Easl. 129.75 leel Measured) 10 lho POINT OF SEGINNING.
Beering lrom G.L.O. record lor Sourh half ol Secrion line beiween S€dions l4-15. (G.L.O. record Souh 0l
degfe€s 30.2 minules Eas0 lsourh 0l degrees 38 minues 32 seconds Easl Measursd)
Applicant:
Planner:
Juanita l. Pedotto
Andy Knudtsen
o i ol^V4
\ f'Md"
\ ftc P+'sa'J*['a'
February 28, 1994
A request to rezone a trac! from PrimaryiSecondary Residential to Low
Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
specifically described as follows:
A parcel ol land in rh€ Soulhwesl Ouaner ol Soclion 14, Township 5 Soulh, Range 81 Wesl ot lhe 61h Principal
Meridian. more panicularly describ€d as lollows:
ence Sourh 68 degrees 18 minutes 9t seconds Wesl,320.00 leel:
ii'"#$,xiild**#ifli*iiil'lirxat*t.
pLANNfr ffi,.Affi f, ';1'"'3,"1;"T,lli"T*l''f ififfi :3,1Hn'J"ffi'T:i?'i"f":":L*:ff""?*
ENVIRoNMEhTTEHHmd[ttf9$tgl*:1H1il:^'3i$,11flL::i':?"ff.:ffi';T"TJ::'i"1",ffi:S,'
seconds Easl,4420 feet: Thencs Soulh 14 degre€s 25 minules 50 s€conds Wesl. l10r5l leel:
PROJECT DESCRlPTION
The applicant, Juanita Pedotto, and her representative, Greg Amsden, would like to rezone a
parcel bf land in Intermountain from Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-
Family. lf rezoned, the applicant is planning lo construct nineteen dwelling units in fourteen
structures. The parcel of land is 2.49 acres. Of this, there are 2.36 acres that are considered
buildable by the Town of Vail standards.
In addition to a rezoning, the proposal includes a minor subdivision request. In lhe future, the
applicant inlends to use the single family subdivision process to sell off the individualdwelling
units. Prior to this, however, the currently unplatted parcel must be platted as a lot. This
provides an opportunity to document building lootprint locations, GRFA restrictions, and other
development slandards on the plat. These standards will be listed on the plat and will be
applicable to any developer as well as luture home owners.
o
Since the previous worksession, the applicant has deleted one single family dwelling unit from
the site plan. Another change is that the building envelopes have been deleted and replaced
with specitic building footprints. Previously, a prototypical footprint was shown within an
envelope. lt measured 37 feet by 37 feet. The updated footprints have been increased to 40
by 54 feet for the larger type of unit and 38ffileet for the smaller type.
4z \ rrs'{
The footprints will be a minimum of '15 feet apart. The applicant is requesting the ability to
shift the footprints as much as ten feet, if needed. However, stalf believes a maximum of 5
teet is all that is reasonable. Changes in lootprint location would have to be approved by the
DRB. Fifteen feet of separation would have to be maintained for both lhe structures and
decks.
The current site plan proposed by the applicant is made up of nineteen dwelling units in
fourteen structures. Nine of these will be single family residences. Three of them will be
single family residences with a deed restricted caretaker unit located above the garage. Four
of the dweliing unils will be located in two duplexes. The ffi[l would be
fourteen. Tolal GRFA for these dwelling units is anticipaled lobR . A site
olan is attached at the end of this mem6 which shows wnere thelb
iocated. The chart below shows the break down of the structures
9 single family
3 single family with EHU's
2 duolexes
TOTAL:
North:
East:
South:
West:
Number of Units
-9
3
,.:li JAT!'Ii,f. r, .OFi lVFll
Number of Struclures
t'
be
I
b
!'
19
r-no
, -, Z-*..re ; Jl.;fiA.t<l
trt
The architect has designed three styles lor the fourteen structures. These are shown in lhe
perspective attached at the end of the memo. Each type will have the same materials, which
include a stucco first story and horizontal cedar siding on the second story. The roofs will be
shake shingles and will have clipped gables. There will be corbels to support the second
story cantilevers as well as the eaves. The windows will all have shutters to help create a
bavirian appearance. Though there are three diflerent interior plans, the exterior mass and
bulk is almost identical for two of the units. Therefore, there will appear to be only two
different types of exteriors. The larger home, with the caretaker unit, will have a lootprint
measuring'40 feet by 54 feet. The smaller home will have a footprint measuring 38 feet by 30
feet.
The neighboring properties to the parcel under consideration include:
Columbine North
Primary/Secondary development
Camelot Townhouses and single family development
PrimaryiSecondary development
The property to the north and east is zoned Flesidential Cluster. The property to the south
and west is zoned Primary/Secondary. The Land Use Plan has designated the parcel under
consideration as Medium Density Residential. Per Land Use Plan, a range of seven to thirty-
three units is possible based on the 2.49 acres. This translales to three to fourteen dwelling
units per acre.
II. BACKGROUND/FORMER HEQUESTS
ln October of 1990, the Professional Development Corporation proposed employee
housing developments on several sites in the Town of Vail. The Pedotto site was one
of them. In their request, they proposed Medium Family Multi-Family (MDMF) zoning.
ln the memo dated October 29, 1990, staff recommended that the applicant reduce the
number of units on this site to LDMF densities and maintain lhe amount of GRFA on
the site to RC standards. The proposal for the site is shown below:
Tvpe ol Unit Number ot Units Square Foolaoe GRFA
Efliciency Units 435 sq. tt. 2,610 sq. fl.
One Bedroom Unils 6 482 sq. fi. 2,892 sq. fi.
Two Bedroom Units 27 609 sq. ft. 15.443 sq. tt.
TOTAL: 39 21,945 sq. tl.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
Tolal Sile Area: 108.682 souare feel or 2.49 acres
Buildable Area: ,,'102,788 square fe6t or 2.36 acres
Allowed Dwelling Unils Employee Housing
Densilv Allowed Unils Allowed GRFA Allowed'
PrimEq/secondary: 15,OOO sq. tl. ol 12 d,velling unils 6 EHU'S by 24,368 + 5,100'
ouildable requiled coodilional teview' 29;468 sq. tt.
per lol (six lols)
Residenliaf Clusler: 6 dwellinE unils per 14 dwelling units -- 25,697 + 3,150'
buildable acre 28,847 sq' tt'
Low Density
Mulliplo Family: 9 dwelling units per 21 dwelling unils -- 30,836 + 4,725 -
buildable acre 35,561 sq' tl'
Land Use Plan Medium
Density Residentia.l: 3lo 14 dwelling unils 7 to 33 dwelling units
oer buildable acte
Proposed: 8.5 dwelling unils 16 dwelling units 3 EHU'S 21,625 + 4,275 -
per buildable acre 25,900 sq. ft.
'These 6 EHU's would nol count in density calculations.
"Garages nol induded in GRFA calculations.
Staft has analyzed lhe proposed sile plan submitled by the applicanl and has provided a zoning analysis below'
Total Site Area: 108,682 sq. fi. or 2.49 acres
Euildable Area: 102,788 sq. tt. or 2.36 acres
Zoning which would b€ in effecl: Low Density Mulli'Family
Uses:
Lot Area:
Setbacks:
...:
Height:
GRFA:
Density:
Site Coverage:
Landscaping:
Parking:
Allowed Per
LDMF Standards
Single Family, Two Family, and Multi-Family
Minimum size: 1 0,000 sq. ft. of buildable
Required:
Front: 20'
Side: 2A
Side: 20'
Rear: 20"
?A'
30,836 + 4,725 = 35,561 sq. ft.
9 dwelling units per buildable acre or
2l dwelling units
35% ol total area or 38.038.7 sq. ft.
40rol. of total site area or 43,472.8 sq. tt.
Per olFstreet parking requirements
ProposEd
Single Family and Two Family
102,788 sq.
Front: 20'
Side: 29
Side: 2q
Rear: 20'
ft. ol buildable
(west)
(east)
33'
21,625 + 4,275 = 2s,900 sq. ft.
8.1 dwelling units per buildable acre or
19 dwelling units
19.5olc or 2'1,137 sq. ft.
71.8o/o o( 73,761 sq. ft.
Meets codE
IV. REZONING CRITER]A
A. Suitabilitv ol the orooosed zoninq.
Staff's analysis of the suitability of the proposed zoning focuses on density''. compatibility with surrounding developmenls, and ways that the proposed development
can be bulfered from existing neighboring uses.
Staff recognizes that many of the surrounding properties adjacent to this parcel are
multi-family complexes. The applicant has eslimated iheir densities to exceed
Residential Cluster (RC) standards and staff has confirmed this information. The
surrounding multi-family developments have densities that range from 1 1.3 dwelling
units per acre lo 22.2 dwelling units per acre. Please see the chart below. There are
also s|rrounding single family and primaryisecondary developments.which have
densities thal are lower than the proposal'
Name Units Area Density
Inlerlocken 10 1.80 21.6
Columbin€ Nonh to .92 17 .4
Flussheim 4 .24 13.8
Innsbrook I ..tb 22.2
Columbine Wesl .oz 11.3
Camelot I 22.2
Though the density of the surrounding properties are higher than Residential Cluster,
the type of development (single family, duplex or multi-family) effects the way the
density appears on this site. For example, many of the developmenls are made up of
. lownhouses. Since the units are more compact than detached single family homes,
the structures do not cover as much of the site and are likely to have larger areas ot
useable open space. Staff believes that the proposal should be modified to improve
the amount of useable open space, to reduce the amount of asphalt, and to increase
architectural variety within the clusters on the site.
Specifically, staff believes that Units 13 and 14, Units 7 and 8, and Units 1 andZ
should be combined. The units to be consolidated, however, should be the smaller of
the two styles. At this time, the larger unit with the employee housing caretaker
aparlment is shown in each of the three areas. We are concerned that the struc.tures
may be too large if triplexes are crealed. Therefore, in addition to consolidating these
footprints, stafl believes that the employee housing units should be shilted to other
footprints in the development. We believe lhat the variety of massing created by a
combination of units will help the development be more compatible with the
surrounding properties, as they have been developed in more of a townhouse style' ln
addition, staff believes that the resulting open spaces will be larger and will be able to
accommodate additional landscaping, particularly on the northeast, northwest and
central portions of the site.
Landscaping is a key issue in staff's opinion, as the amount of density to be
considered under lhe rezoning proposal should be evalualed based on how it is
buffered from adjacent properlies. Staff is primarily concerned about the perimeter of
the site.
Atthistime,theapp|icanthascommittedtothefol|owing:
1. Six clusters of aspen located around the perimeter of the project along
Bellflower and Kinnickinnick. These clusters range from three to eight
aspen each.
2. On the east end of lhe site, there will be len to twelve aspen along
Basingdale.
3. Two planting areas of aspen made up of a total of fifteen to twenty trees
will be located next to the Camelot Townhouses.
Staff understands that the diawings submitted to the Design Review Board (DRB) will
include additional landscaping and that the landscaping shown on these plans reflects
the basic landscaping needed to bulfer adjacent properties. The landscaping listed
above must be incorporated into the DRB drawings and must be planted prior to
issuance of a final certificale of occupancy for the dwelling unit adjacent to the
landscaping.
Another key issue that relates to landscaping is the preservation of the green space in
the center portion of the site. Since the last worksession with the Planning and
Environmental commission (PEC), the applicant has had an environmental
assessment (EA) done for the wetland area. This report is attached to the back of this
memo and delineates the boundary of the wetland area as well as a 10 foot buffer
area along all sides of the wetlands. The map from the EA was drawn on the previous
plan which showed a building lootprint within the buffer area. This has been corrected.
The revised location sites the building outside the buffer area. Stalf believes that any
rezoning approval should be conditioned with a requirement that lhe consultant return
to the site in the spring or summer to confirm that his analysis made during winter
months is accurate. Any modilications that would be generated by the consultant
would have to be included into the site plan. Building footprints would have to be
shifled if the update indicates that they are localed in the butfer area. lf the footprints
need lo be shifted, slaff believes the project should be reconsidered by the PEC.
There are some large existing aspen in this area adjacent to the wetland area to the
west. They range in size from two inch caliper to eight inch caliper. Stafl believes that
any trees that can be transplanted should be. ll they. are to be cut down, they should
be replaced on a 1 :1 ratio based on the caliper of the tree to be removed. For
example, and eight inch caliper tree would have to be replaced with two 4 inch caliper
trees. Staff believes this is reasonable since larger trees do not transplant well
according to the Town's Landscape Architect.
Staff understands that the applicant desires to change the zoning from
Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi Family to allow additional units,
not necessarily more GRFA or site coverage. The applicant has agreed to reduce the
amount of GRFA to below Primary/Secondary standards and maintain the amount of
sitd coverage and height to Primary/Secondary standards. These restrictions will be
recorded as plat restrictions. Staff does not have a problem with the number of units if
they can be sited in such a way to provide adequaie open space, bulfering and
minimal sile coverage. ln order to achieve this, we believe a more clustered design
concept is necessary. We feel an adequate landscape plan has been provided, the
wetland area has been protecled, and that unit layout is good as long as the units are
combined as suggested above.
o
B. ls the Amendment Providino a Convenient. Workable Relationship with Land
Under this criteria, staff has evaluated the rezoning proposal to ensure that it will
provide workable relationships to those properties around the site. In addition, the
rezoning proposal must be consistent wilh the Municipal Objectives. Ensuring that.the
future development will have a reasonably compatible relationship with the existing
neighborhood has been the locus of much of this review. On January 17, 1994, there
was a neighborhood meeting attended by approximately thirty neighbors. Attached to
the merno are all of the letters that have been received by staff from the neighbors.
The primary concerns of the neighbors seem to revolve around pedestrian safety and
traffic safety. Staff has conlacted the Police Deparlment and the Public Works
Department since the neighborhood meeting to ask lhem to look at increasing patrol as
well as increasing the number of stop signs in the area. This appears to be a problem
that needs to be solved independbnt ol the rezoning issue.
However, the proposal will have some positive impact on these issues, since there will
be public improvements made by the developer. The Town is requiring the developer
to provide a sidewalk that will run lhe length of the property. The applicant is
proposing a 6 foot wide walk that will be detached from the edge of pavement on
Kinnickinnick, The Town is requiring that lhis be a hard surface walk that can be
maintained during winter monlhs. lt will be the responsibility of the homeowners
associalion to keep the walk clear, This is a Town wide requiremenl that applies to all
developments that have adjacent sidewalks. The applicant is proposing a cinder walk;
however, staff believes it musl be hard surface. Please see the plat restrictions at lhe
end of this memo regarding the sidewalk and other public improvements.
A concern related to safety involves the number of curb culs on Basingdale, Bellflower,
and Kinnickinnick. Originally, the applicant had submitted a plan with five curb cuts on
Kinnickinnick and three on Bellflower and Basingdale. Since the orlginal submittal, the
archltect has removed all curb cuts off of Basingdale and Bellflower.. Staff believes
that this is a significant improvement as the driveways were previously localed
relatively close to the intersections.
At this time there are five curb culs for lhe entire project which access from
Kinnickinnick. These curb cuts access shared driveways. Staff believes that the
revised plan provides a more efficient use of the site and leaves more of the land as
landscaped area and open space. Though there has not been an increase in the
number of curb cuts on Kinnickinnick from what was originally submitted, staff believes
there is an opportunity to improve the situation. By relocating the access lo Building
Envelope #1 from Kinnickinnick to the shared access on the southwest corner of the
site, there would be more open space around Building Envelope #1, and one less curb
cut on Kinnickinnick. Stalf believes that this would be an improvement.
Another concern of the neighborhood involved parking, storage, and general
appearance of the project. The neighbors were concerned that individuals living in this
development would not have adequate parking and thal additional cars would be
parked in the neighboring parking lots. Statf has reviewed this concern with the
developer and believes that the two car garages for each unit and the driveways in
fronl of each unil will accommodate the parking demand. An alternative would be to
create a parking lot for guests. However, staff believes that the parking apron in front
ol each garage can accommodate guests most of the time.
Regarding storage, during the neighborhood meeting it was suggested that there be an
area on the side of each garage for bicycles and other miscellaneous items. The
applicant has designed one of the garages to be 480 square feet. The drawings show
a'template of a Suburlran and a Cherokee to indicate how much ol the garage will be
taken up by automobiles. The remaining area of the garage will be available for
slorage, and stafl believes that this will be an adequate amount. One of the goals with
the slorage area was to ensure that the two parking spaces will always be available lor
parking. Though this cannot be guaranteed, statf believes that providing the storage
that is shown on the drawings is a reasonable assurance lhat the spaces will be
available. Stafl believes it is critical that the olher unils (with garages approximately
387 square leet in size) be expanded to the size of the larger garage.
A significant concern to the planning staff was how the developer was going to work
out agreements with the neighbors adjacenl to the southwest corner of the site
concerning parking and access. Currently, there are parking and driveway
encroachmenls onlo the Pedotto property by the neighbors. The applicant has worked
closely with the two existing homeowners in this area and has worked out agreements
with them for shared access. This access also includes a fire truck turnaround. All of
the driveway in this area will be p4ved. The adjacent owners will share the expenses
with the developer. Staft believes that this is an excellent resolution to a problem that
has occurred for some time. Staff wants lo emphasize the positive benefits that result
from the solution have been negotiated by the applicant.
One of the final issues of concern by the neighbors involves the appearance of the
project. The applicant has provided prototypical elevations as well as a perspective ol
three homes sharing one driveway. Staff believes that the design character of the
homes is positive, including the materials, detailing and general massing.
Staff believes lhat lhe three employee housing units proposed in this development are
consistent with the Land Use Plans goals of the Town to have employee housing units
added to our community. We believe that this component of the development
addresses a larger community need. By dispersing the three deed restricted employee
housing unils among the nineteen dwelling units, statf believes that there is a good
balance of free market and employee units within the development. Attached to the
end of this memo are employee housing restrictions that have been tailored for this
development. They are based on the Type lll EHU; however, they do not include
provisions that allow the sale of the employee housing unit.
In order to ensure that the future development on the
in an orderly manner, statf has prepared lhe following
located on the plat and recorded at the County Clerk
rezoned parcel
plat restrictions
and Recorder:
will be developed
which will be
Plat Restrictions
1.. Allconstruction shallconform io the standards listed below and shallcomply
wilh the building footprints shown on the attached site plan.
2. There must be a minimum 15 foot separation between structures, including all
decks and cantilevered portions, but excluding eaves. Prior to the application
for any building permit, the applicant must provide survey information verilying
the location ol previously built structures to show that the 15 foot separation
requiremenl will be met.
3. The height limitation for lhe development on this parcel shall be lowered from
the 38 feet allowed by LDMF zoning to 33 teet.
4. All driveways to be constructed o4 fhis site shall not exceed 8% slope.
^ ri't r{ l^< -r^^1
5. GRFA and site coverage'shall be allocated for the structures as follows:
Buildlng
€nwlopc ,Dwslllng Unit3 Credlt GRFA
'l;L1 c,ft1
I# Allowod Sile Cover.ge Helght
2 450 sq. tr.2,080 sq. fi.2.530 sq. tl.1.800 sq. tl.33 tt.
225 sq. tl.1,425 sq. h.1.650 sq. tt.I,400 sq. fi.33 tt.
1 225 sq. fi.1.4e5 sq. tl.1,650 sq. tl.1.400 sq. fi.33 fi.
4 t 225 sq. ft.1,425 sq. h.1,650 sq. tl.1,400 sq. tr.33 tr.
E 450 sq. i.1,680 Eq. h.2,130 sq. n.1.683 sq. fi.33 tr.
D I 225 sq. tt.I J25 sq. tl.|,650 sq. n.1,400 sq. n.33 tr.
I 225 sq. h.t.{25 sq. tr.1,650 sq. tl.| ,400 sq. h.
8 2 ,150 sq. tt.1,680 sq. tl.2,130 sq. fi.I,683 sq. fi.
I 225 sq. tt.lI25 sq. tr.| ,650 sq. fi.| ,400 sq. lt.3tt tr.
10 I 225 sq. i.1,425 sq. fi.I ,650 sq, h.I,400 sq. tt.
450 sq. fi.1.6E0 sq. n.2,130 sq. i.! ,683 sq. h.33 tr.
t2 I 225 sq. i.1.425 sq. tt.1,650 sq. fi.1,400 sq. t.
r3 225 sq. n.1.425 sq. n.I ,650 sq. h.| ,400 sq. fi.ttfi
l4 ,150 sq. fi.t,680 sq. tt.2,r 30 sq. n.t,683 sq. fi.33 h.
6. No fences shall be allowed on this property.
7. Phasing - The applicant shallprbvide the employee housing unils according to
the phases shown below.
A. Prior lo the issuance of a final CO or TCO for any Owbtting unit located
on Building Footprints #1 through #6, the applicant shall secure a final
Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the
first of three deed restricted employee housing units.
B. Prior lo requesting a linal CO or TCO for any dwelling unit on Building
Footprints 7, 8,9 or 10, the applicant shall secure a linal CO or TCO for
the second of three deed restricted EHU for the development.
C. Prior to requesting a final CO or TCO for any dwelling unit located on
Building Footprints 11,12, 13, or 14, the applicant shall secure a final
CO or TCO for the third ol three deed restricted employee housing units.
The Fire Department and Public Works Department have reviewed the proposal and
support the project with the following conditions.
Fire Department
1. The fire access easement must be defined and then recorded at the County
clerk and Becorder prior lo DRB approval of any dwelling unit. The easement
must be posled in lield with "No Parking" signs.
2. All driveway surfaces must be "all weather driving surfaces."
3. The lire lruck turnaround must be expanded to 20 feet in width.
4. Hydrants must be installed according to Town of Vail standards.
Public Works
1. Detailed regrading and landscape plans for the sidewalk and right-of-way area
must be provided prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelling units. The Town
Engineer is requiring sidewalks, curb, gutter, storm sewer, inlets, engineering
drawings and/or grading plans to be provided by the developer' The Town
Engineer may allow a ditch with a detached sidewalk, but needs additional
inlormation to verify that this design will function.
2. Easements must be dedicated for the sidewalks, drainage, utilities, road side
ditches, streetlights, etc. prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelling unit.
Staff has listed the relevant goals and objeclives from the Land Use Plan below:
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance
between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor
and the permanent resident.
D.
10
1.2 The qualily ol the environment including air, water and other natural resources
should be protected as the Town grows.
i.lz Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed
areas (infill areas).
5.1 Additional residential growth should conlinue lo occur primarily in existing,
platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist.
5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded.
Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites' throughout the community.
The Land Use Plan designates this site as Medium Density Residential. Under this
designation, the dwelling units allowed on this site range trom 7 to 33. Based on the
MDR designation, staff believes some increase in units by rezoning is reasonable.
The goals and'objectives in the Land Use Plan describe development generally like the
one being proposed. Goals 1.12 and 5.1 call for infill development that is not localed
in hazards. This plan complies with these goals. Also, the Land Use Plan calls for'
additional employee housing, which will be included in this proposal. Staff believes lhe' three employee housing units proposed are positive.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and minor subdivision. We believe the
proposed LDMF zoning is consistent with the rezoning crileria and will be compatible with the
surrounding properties. Specifically, staff believes that the requested zoning is suitable for the
site given that it will be integrated into the neighborhood per ihe design of the site plan. We
belive that the request provides for workable relationships with surrounding land uses and is
consistent with municipal objectives. Specifically, it is consistent with five ditferent goals as
well as the MDR land use designation of lhe Town's Land Use Plan, Finally, staff believes
that the plat restrictions will insure that the developmenl will contribute the viability of the
community. The proposed subdivision meets all of the platting requirements of the code.
Therefore staff recommends approval with the conditions that
1. The developer shall submit lhe subdivision plat, sile plan, and recording fees to
the Town prior to issuance of any building permit for a slructure on this
property. The plat and site plan shall include the plat restrictions listed below
and all future development shall conform to these.
a. All conslruction shall conlorm lo lhe slandards lisled below and shall comply wilh lhe building
canlilevered podions, but excluding eaves., lhe
applicanl musl provide survey inlOrrnalion lhe location ol previously built slructuras lo show
lhal lhe 15 fool separalion requiremenl will
tt'-
{,
: , t, t,'.',---l\1h+ flt
1 .. , ['t-tttr't *'
,ns&'[' t(Irr
, l- (n*
foolprinls shown on the aflached sile plan..-,6ffi,"*
There musl be a minimum 15 foot separalion belween slruclure* lncluding all decks and
11
9vb><7,.2*t , b.'4 P'*sf
a{'PLr .t{n 5
The height limilation lor ths development on lhis parcel shall b€ lowerad from the 38 feel allowed by
LDMF zoning to 33 leel.
All driveways to be conslructed on this sile shall.nol exceed 8% slop6.
GRFA and she coverage shall be allocaled tor lhe slructures as follows:
Buildlng
Env€lope f Dwolling Unltg Credlt GRFA Totsl Allowed Slls Covorsge Hslght
I 2 450 sq. tl.2,080 sq. tl.2,530 sq. tl.|,800 sq. tt.33 11.
2 1 225 sq. h.1,425 sq. tl.1,650 sq. tl.1,400 sq. tl.t2h
225 sq. t.1325 sq. tr.I .650 sq. ir.1300 sq. n.33 fr.
225 sq. tl.I ,425 sq. fi.1,650 sq. tt.1,400 sq. tr.33 tr.
2 450 sq. tr.t,680 sq. fi.2,130 sq. fl.1,683 sq. tl.
225 sq. i.1,425 sq. tt.1.550 sq. n.1,400 sq. i.33 tl.
1 225 sq. tr.1,425 sq. h.1,650 sq. fi.1,400 sq. tl.33 n.
8 450 sq. tt.I,680 sq. tl.2,130 sq. fr.I,583 sq. tl.
a I 225 sq. fi.1,.a25 sq. tr.I ,650 sq. fi.1,400 sq. tr.
r0 I 225 sq. tl.r,425 sq. n.I,650 sq, tt.t .400 sq. fi.a2|r
2 450 sq. lt.| .680 sq. i.2.130 sq. tr.| ,683 sq. i.33 tr.
't2 1 225 sq. h.1.42S sq. fi.1,650 sq. tt.1,400 sq. fi.
13 I 225 sq. i..| ,4?5 sq. tt.I,650 sq. h.1300 sq. fi.33 tl.
450 sq. i.|,6E0 sq. fi.2,130 sq. n.I,683 sq. tl.33 fl.
t.
o.
No lences shall be allowed on lhis propeny.
Phasing - The applicad shall provid€ th€ emPloye€ housing unils according lo lh€ Phases shoYn below.
i. Prior lo rh€ issuanc€ ol a final CO or TCO lor any d\Yelling unh localed on
through t6, lho applicant shail secu.e a linai Conific€ls ol Occupancy or Temporary Conilicale ol
Occupancy fot lhg first ol lhree d€ed reslricled €mploy€e housjng unils.
ii. Prior 10 ieque$ing a final CO or TCO lor any dwelling unh on Building Foolprinls 7, 8, I ot 10, lho
aDDticarn shall securE a final CO or TCO lor the second of lhree deed resxicled EHU for lhe
develoPmenl.
iii. p'|or lo reque$ing e liml CO o, TCO lor any dwelling unil localed on Building FoolPfinls 11, 12, 13, ot
14, lhe applicanl shall sacure a finel CO or TCO lo. rhe lhird ol three deed reslrided emPloye€
housing unils.
The developer shall have the Environmental Assessment updated and shall
have any required amendment lo the site plan presented to the PEC for their
review and approval prior to the issuance ot,building permit on this property.
t ["^{
Building Footprints 1 and2,7 and 8, and 13 and 14 shallbe combined into
duplexes and the employee housing units shall be relocated to other building
footprints on this site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by
the PEC prior to any DRB hearing for any dwelling unil on this property.
2.
J.
lz
4. The driveways serving Building Footprint #1 shall be relocated from
Kinnickinnick to the shared common access on the southwest corner of the
property. This modiiication shall be made to prior to any DRB hearing for any
dwelling unit on this property.
5. Existing landscaping located west of the green space area in the center of the
site shall be transplanted or replaced on a 1:1 ratio based on the caliper of the
existing trees.
The applicant shall amend the site plan and subdivision plat according to the
Public.Works and Fire Department commenls listed below. These changes
6.
shall be done prior to any DRB hearing for any dwelling unit on thif site.
t 'o"uJ "n**VLFireDepartment n4rt /^ ttt ro ,/
v/ I n*d a1#-a ^A. The fire access easement must be delined and then record€d at the
*']--
County Clerk and Recorder prior to DRB approval of any dwelling unit.
The easement must be posted in field wilh "No Parking" signs. ;\--,1
B. All driveway surfaces must be "all weather driving surfaces."
C. The fire truck turnaround must be expanded to 20 feet in width. & ,
D. Hydrants must be installed according to Town of Vail standa ro". ffiff-
Pubf ic Works
A. Detailed regrading and landscap " or^n6ror f^r{rp(#^f
"1way area must be provided prior to a D\B hearing for any dwelling '
units, The Town Engineer: is requiring sidewalks, curb, gutter, storm
sewer, inlets, engineering drawings and/or grading plans to be provided
B.
by the developer. The Town.Engineer may allow a ditch with a
detached sidewalk, but needs additional information to verify that this
design will function.
Easemenls must be dedicated for the sidewalks, drainage, utililies, road
side ditches, streetlights, etc. prior to a DRB hearing for any dwelling
unit.
",Wat,,"rorrO"O{oK
fl'|t'
tYK
13
.r" '.. jl,*..in.
t xttro
. ot..O&
I t!2lt .'I'
I
'!
_ r I i.l r I
i IitiIr
!lItlfiirrili
{ii
l:l rlfa:t.t;:!!l!tt:tt2il'fiir;i:!ii,F,li:lzet=JLoz
ccG
'i!\
I
\l
.(
{
f
t
n
l?
la
I{1l
6ri.l!
!!
r!
rt
It
;i
t'
t
1gii
.;F
',.E
? i'-l :li
i $ii
T-
iil
iiiiftJ
fl1,
fl,,,7
iril t,
i!:!:
Iiiii
lC^
IN
\
N
I
{
d
EI
i
d
l,llltltII| !'ttilrililliiilriifihiliiiii!lirlll$iilft*ilIiliii,il!l$tlittjffiffiriitlriiir!rlli,rii jj r lrI lliilli
il
aIHt\R\(
--l
\
=x.{
(o
:'s "
;:s,.rRb
isi
S=
S
F-.
\
q"
-_l
$
,il
rlll
rili
j,\q:t
R
so!II
t
I
Ii
It
It
t
TIliii
t!!t
l:tt
lli!
tiit
Irro
---<=4lO--.---'
'q uea@\rbc
raar.);-i$.'
F
:t
!lg
II25 SEVEIMEENTH STREET. SUITE I2OO, DENVER, COLORADO 80202.2027
(303) 294-9100 FAx: (303) 299-790r
January 21, 1994
Communiry Development
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Attn: Mr. Andrew Knutdsen
Re: Wetland Analysis - Pedotto Property
West Vail
Dear Mr. Knudtsen:
File:02442-050
The above-referenced property was inqpected on January 19, 1994, to determine whether
wetlands occur on the site. This inspection was conducted with Greg Amsden of Christopher
Denton Red Estate and Russell Forest. Town of Vail staff.
This analysis must be considered preliminary because of snow, which covered most understory
vegetation. Therefore, shn-rbs and trees were used to indicate potential wetland areas, along with'
site hydrology along a stream.
The results of the field inqpection are provided in the attached letter report.
Please contact me at I-299-7836 if you have questions on the information provided herein.
cc: Greg Amsden
LRH:E.o
p:\vril\pcdoao\triot
Sincerel
Enclosure
OMCES T,'ORLD\VIDE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSES SMENT
PEDOTTO PROPERTY
The Pedotto property that is adjacent to Kinnikinick Road in West Vail, Colorado, was inspected
on January 19, 1994, to determine if wetlands occur on the site, and to indicate the approximate
extent of wetlands. Because of extensive snow cover, exact locations of wetland boundaries
could not be determined. However, the presence of wetlands were indicated by plant species
that were evident, and usually occur in wet areas.
A small drainage algles across theproperty from south (southeast) to north (northwest), and is
marked by a riparian willow communify @late l). Based on the presence of willows (Salix spp.)
and redosier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera), this wetland area varies from 10 to 30 feet wide
along the drainage (see attached map).
A se'cond small wetland may occur southwest of the stream as a small seep. This area was
marked by a small stand (10 to 15' in diameter) of cow parsnip (Heracleum sphondylium) and
cow bain (Orypolis fendleri) , which are associated with wet soils @late 2). Other plant species
in this area include honeysuckle (.onicera dioica) and grounded (Senecio serra). Honeysuckle
is considered to be facultative to both upland and wetland aleas, and groundsel is an upland
species. Thus, this area may not meet wetland criteria.
Other parts of the site support an aspen (Populus tremuloides) woodland of trees ranging in DBH
(diameter at breast height) from 2 to 8 inches on the west side of the stream; and an open or
non-forested (grassland) area occurs on the east side ofthe drainage (Plate 3).
Recommendations
It is my recommendation that construction not occur in the area containing corv parsnip that
likely contains a seep in the aspen woodland and in areas adjacent to the stream. Thus, no
"dredge and fill" activity would occur and a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers would not
be required. Ivloreover, the property should be developed in a way that existing wetlands be
protected from degradation during and after property development. A buffer area ofvegetation
should be developed between building envelopes and the wetlands to reduce the amount of
influence that development has on wetlands and on rvater quality. The buffer should be at least
i0 feet wide.
Underground utilities (e.g., sewer line) cross the drainage near the road, which would allow for
a crossing beneath the hydrologic floor of the stream without disturbing the wetland. Tunneling
beneath the stream will neei to be done in a manner that maintains stream hydrology and does
not place soil or other material in wetland areas.
.'J.;i i
T.,1lt3F CAt,LF vt".t(rf l
)4:.*,=uw
td
,IR
I
T1'i-a'qr_H
il
Oz1"
i;:+:ti
j4t
IJJ
50 {eet . '
.- tNv ?6 6t r'- "".'1 '7..-
...-*..:ti:
;::_1r..ry-
l-ca=Nee .ge-r
N?
ffi
'1 ,.0o, r/otet .c 09 . iLs. a56r _/ F
.^/. X z-'u -11--:"
\i--...:'-.. *\----.-\:-_:,.._l.-''"
La<.-\:-... ' ..
t:re#!TtM,Il--?====-:
g#:+-; '',/,/,/ | I --yi, nrMsz.eol'--
{*}!,ih,' ,/ ,/ I .- - I rlv. qs.lbw -._. .;..r'
t.';'i 9 --' .\
it ijSii r.il:.Ji)IillrllU ivtI ), -
{:ot
Plate.3. Stream system near property boundary at Kinnikinick Road.
tr{ lrl il '.J1.!r'ri,q.:$ { 41Fre{rqt'i,-i,t-..,tjtt
.Fir€
. F I -"+!r....
.: .- . ;'_', :.llr. -.
Plate l. Willorv-dominated stream that flon's southeast to
northwest across the property. Area of property on the left
side of photo is non-foresled.
Plate 2. A small seep may
cow parsnip and co\\' bain
be irrdicated by the presence of
(center background).
.l.Aat g t Wt
t
0,c|A effinn
rnscB cnRPHC HnIUrn(rUntilc
Feb 15,
Andy Knudtsen
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado. 81657
Dear Andy,
Think you for your letter abor]t the rescheduling of the planning meeting regarding
the Pedotlo parcel. I appreciate that you have been keeping us informed as these
dates change.
I hope that we will see a presentation on the 28th that includes some of the input
from the January 'Town Meeting" including the reduction in the number of total units
by at least one if not two. As the fleveloper confided to me his margin was 'Very
comtortable". with the existing density, we should be able lo get some sort of
concession on the density issue. fn addition I hope that we can reduce the total
number of access cuts onto Kinnidkinnick road. I'm sure that the other roads on the
east and west ends ol the lot have their difficulties but by putting all of the driveways off
Kinnickinnick it would appear that we are making this road at least as dangerous as
the others it not more so.
I look forward to the meeling on lhe 28th, and thank you again for your help.
Sincerely,
Charles Overy
23698 U.S. Hwy 24, P.O. Box 10, Mlnturn, Colorado, 81645
votce(303) 927-527 4 far/dera(303)8 27 -57 60
roil froe(800) 448-8808 emalt7331 1.1 130@compuserve.com
1994
CHENEY l'lon 1B:{9 PAGE 2/Z
TO: Greg Ansden
Andy Knudtsen
rROM: Kay Cheney
2754 Dasingdale Blvd.. 47 6_4935
I mal- not be abte to attend the neighborhood neeting thisevening, so f wanted to convel, "y-i!u:.i"gu on the proposeddevelopment on the ledotto pr-lpuity.--
. I_h:": to say that I don,t understand the opposition which' rs belng rnountcd to th€ developnent, since it ""urn" to me--to convey_a r.er7 residential feeling, phich-i"-;;;; i-tiil"trnost people in rntermountain are hoping to have, iri""f.i--"as it is. possible with the "o'ao^inlu^'pr":""i1'.ir"Jii'i,the neighborhood.
I. think. it is a. good idea to.build single family lrones,srnce that is what fa,-nilies in Vail ,.ru"t ,ro, that k6 arecornins of ase.. rhe farniii."-it ut-iuJI"ri".J ;;;; i;r;'-
:::::1.,1?::_s'::" fron-renting "p"ir,n.r,rs, to cwnins
:::::ot":*rs, .then Cuplexes ancl ultimarely_singlc iJnifynornes. Regardless of nhether or not that is the best uieof our limiteC space, that is "fr"t-fuJpr. ,.nt.
Buildirig the homes for sa1e, rather than rental, also addsto the residential quality of the ir"j"t".
f thinls.the revised site plan appears to be an improvementaesthetically on the orisinal *1.;; ;I.;.
As I nentioned at the sork session in December, my onlyqoncern uould be that a- rezoning to low density ni"fti_i. ilV,so that the nature :f tfe au,r"foprnent-cculd ;;t ;;-;.;;;^.onco the increased density uas afproved.
ll1-:"tt" that f night nor be able to attend the rneeting,j]19? "" often on1y. negative voices are heard at these ''neetrngs, If I can 9e: a.lay fron my othel- appointneniearly cnough, I will be thele.
J HN-1.4-iy:r4 uu: 11
IAiE:
Jrto"tt.
Oiglt!t Commun:c.tiont Oivicio^
Bociwell tnternationat Corlo13tiao
5000 ljirci St/cct
Suile .(CC
t\lswpon Bcoch, California 92G€0
IIL; (7Iq) 653-q655
FAX: (714) 85i-6898
w
Rockwell
Internatfonal RIC'D,.161,1 1 4 1994
P.g1L.
PAGE ,/ clF
i0:
COiiPAiiY:
a.r.Y .. li r'l .
.THIS IS A FAX TRAI{SI'IISSiON,
r'l.EA-,\E |ttLIVER IrifiE!llAf iLY.
incil, Grr!' B..Rodrieue rtor*"/7 /rf1. .,€aS - faa- 6.r/
/)
,sur,.i:;.. t i fu-o /"___ -E_tj{g _%_aZtl_ro o,t&__
-,.723::-9-Z-2::-33JL-(/. ,Cs,q 4"f
Ah
. _J$. .Y.I*-p*c:_tt_+t grts 8L._,&6 a-'-.-.'--=-
-- .- ----k)s
L"+tJ B. Albn,
>F/L{-ctgv.ror^A +tv- qqv-tra^6
TOTR. P,OO1
I nu.
AIIIER:ICAN
8I(I EXUr*AI\IC]'
--- \r^\O:, \ cluln -{ \qA{LA/ -.
rlrr lo+
O.v\l r (€-ZoIA-L^C,.\,_r ./.r".r,.."r.t-\1.,)F- (_\/\L^ (€.-ZOn_LnC\. \ \-ln\q0\."*ri.\A^; -;- r.^o t*cx \r,,-ro\o $aovr '**-V L\p \Di\\ \\.j 'J
\\a-$ ac.rL **J \{w,uc \\n40{ou{n"tqn\:L t\rr"V- rr>€- CLS Gr-rc\e-v,t= cx{,u
***:-:F
*"*+------'qt
r-a-i-a-
\-q-0 q!"-gU\ A-4r.,=\.1 u;o',.\& n\
b{rrl\E\\ " G!r\^ 0,( \rsj \n \\t-q- v\-!
Geee hnn-Ccrn \\l- \r:\r^,o. o-c&\n\
T-: d.'d\ \:e\tu.Lx- llrr\-qr.n+).'r"\Ci"it
-\\n,^.Y,..Aor2- .,. \-Tcrl ^ t SAL\A-c. Hr chln 5
Dear fntermountain Homeovmers and ResidenLs;
I am wricing to ask everyone to attend a neighborhood meeting at
7:00 PM, Monday, ,fanuary L7th in Ehe Town of Vail Chambers.
Once again, the Pedot.Eo propert.y is scheduled to be railroaded
through in an atE,empt to re-zone from the Primary,/Secondary to
Low Density Multi-Family. If we allow this to happen, we will have
L4 buildings wit,h a tot.a1 of 19 unj.t.s and pobably 40-45 more cars
speeding up Kinnikinnick Road. There are six dri-veways proposed
for these 14 buildings, aL1 buE one exiEing on Kinnikinnick Road.A lit.t.le ludicrous, wouldn'E you say!
The Eota1 GRFA proposed is 25,900 sq.'ft.., similiar to the last.proposal jusc a few years ago thae we all were most. upset about.
This re-zoning request, is being made by Tom Campbe11, whom IbeLieve is the same developer as the lasE Lime this attempt was
made--but this time, as a represenEative for Mrs. PedoE,to, we have
a member of the Planning and Environment.al Commnj-ssion--a biL of aconflicE. of inEerest--wouldn'E you say?
This same PEC that is in favor of 25,9Q0 sg. fE. on 2.36 acres,aside from'up zonj-ng, is the same Commission that recent,ly deniedthe development of a 2+acre parcel to the East. of Meadow Creek
Condominiums. That request was for a duplex of approximately 5500sq. ft.(buildable GRFA j.s over 9,000 sq. ft..). They actually saidthey would like to see less GRFA so it would encroach less on thehillside. Oh, and yes, they vot.ed against, a ret,aining walI for the
driveway. Are they avrare that. we live in Ehe mountains and that,all of E.he desirable flat lots are gone. They are going Eo have Eo
contend with retaining walls--Like Ehe ones just builu in West Vaj.lto support.. those giganEic new duplexes.
In conclusion I would like Mrs. Pedotto Eo know that if she dividedher Land into lot,s and built,'under the current, zoning, no one infntermountain would object.--H/e simply object tso this manystruclures, t.his many driveways and the amount of speeding carsthat this many occupants would invariabJ-y drive.
So don't forget Monday night aE 7200 pm in the Council Chambers,
Town of Vail offices. See you there.
Bobi
MA -N\.OKUBCI S{ .\SSOCIAT:s
c!l':s TAUcTto : cc..:s!1_T,,rNTq
,{.ICHITTCTUNg
DaIO SUrIace
a gleat dctl
exisriDg Vail
se problenls
irrage on thc
)Posed plan,
end that rhe'
inrcrcr earth
n the visual
:
sed project.
l, tlre above
CCR\)UATE OtT,lCe
| 6. | | r-lW\lNn.qTlIEf f
D5*vE ( COL()AAiO !J,:I
ici.Er4tt9
.i{J.sft.1565 (F^)l)
Deccmber20. 1993 I ..: r . ,li
:l
,i.A ^,.ilhe Uliy ot Vall :
Planning Depqrtnrenti
Vail,Colorado i i ; i '
!ll
ATTN:,Andy]tuudrden | ; . :;;t't:!
{n, zs5o Kini,i.kir,,.ii.k Rota zooi.ng i :
' r i -! |.rl
:lDcar iv{r. Kuud(sen: I!::!i ,
titi
Pursuant to our recedt discussions,'I wish'to ft:rmally outline my objections regarciing rhe
Pedotto. Parcel develdpurenr plans,'as curienrly prcsenttiA.
;J-:.t1.!.'lts inct.easo !n_ density on thb progirtl', ccluplcd riirh thc. signifiiant amount of hard surface
i:.5, Y,tl res'lll in an iricreased run-off. A pieliminary invcsrigarion reveats a great dciil0r rnls ru]l-:ff:h:s poleruial:io channel itse.lf into the adjlcent parcel ut the cxi!riug Vaillirvim and Te'nnis Clbb enriance. llis increascd nrn.off ivill not only cause pro-blun.,s
.4lsocjaqe{,witli rh.e e5rtrance; but it rviil have a oegative.inrpacr.on rhcsiie Orai,ragu on ries.tructures i rnn e diate Iy adja ic nt ro Kjluick innick Roacl..:
|1sec,on! co;nceIn 1ui,i.l ujc bave;regarrling tbe. increased deruity and the proposed plan,
&lates !o the iircltltec*tural design rvhich ls be in.q proposid. We hiilhly rcconirnend rhat the
:cYel9qer soft9n the yery hard lines of his prcrject'throug,h rhe ulilization of pe rinrcrcr earth
DeilnlnS, anO a genefous jn$rallation of conifers and deciduous trees to soften rhe visualrmPact.: i :
:
. ..'
l :
l,l::l] _t9.19.\?r., you.lbat ,i rF,lo.t in pbjection ro rhe. devetoper,s:proposed project.
However' m the best:intereit oi thb imegi of r.le!.'clopnr'enr in ihe iorvp of Vait, rlri above[e.ras need to.be addresscd :by the.developer.
/\il':| \ | At,xt \ '. lvr' ! |91pr-9re11/[/: ; :il\\ vt,t r I
I | | I ll I-11 \ lll I i ' !\t ilt : :
r rx;,ill..'l*, o.,.i ' i
tt:.illr | | :H .i., : Itt | '\i!
Noi,rHvrsr cmct i c{uror:.rtr crRce , sor,.ilt?vrsr oFRcE ccR\?rATE orr,rrccl strrrer '*nrrr, sL'irE tc? : rsoi^iri^ii.iolr,-e.rr,ro,r, eio rRlvts {r. 16.r rrlw\11{{i.qlstAllr"g ciAsirjA*ordN i6lct j c.\sr.i :.r;s .iii.i[irciitsrr:s HoL,57or1, ?L\As ,?D! D.\*vErL coL6ti{!c6.6!l.r't:l : : . ?:{.J{i_aftJ : ?l!.a.3e.rr?r jcj.E,4!cg!oi."ei1.ea,1 'rrv i i ?r4.r{r.:'?, (r.Af, ; iii.fij.jff,r;, .i{J.srt.r56j (F^)!)
:l;.;
:ii'i:i:i:ii: :i
o
ti'{'".\11
,l
Qe-
\Y
Thi:; petition is d i rec Led to thr: l'own of Vai I in reference to
the request tr> rezone the parcel of land located at 2830
K i rr rr i r: l< i n n i c k . The reason is the time and date' at rvhich tlre meeting
is scheduled. This could not be at a worse time for anyone lrrvolved
lrr tl're tour:i snr busirress, which enconipasses the whole of Vai l.
Thaca -- -,--ity o\'/ners are unable to atterrd tht: rrieet l niJ as
schedu I ed and are opposed to the rezon i nq at 285O Kinnickirrnick.
NAI'IE ADDRESS
o
Cherl cs Ovcqy
2B33 Kinnickinnick #3
Va-il, Color"do 81657
(303) 479-9113
Sun, Dec 19, 1g93
To The Planning and Environmenlal Contmission, Town of Vail,
I must lodge, in ihe strongest possible terms, my protest to your convening a
and zoning rvorksession regarding lhe rezoning of the "Pedo11o parcel" in
Intermountain during what is cenainly one of the lalley's most busy periods.
O,
,In d,-I/oCv .,v\ ,,rd?t\ \r'\
\ z\ 1"t-
\?4
r.{ln-dt: /2
planning l\: l)
lreceived yournotice foran initial meeting on the 13th of December and was able 10
'-" lake lime lo atlend. I spent one and one half hours rvaiting for lhe "request for
worksession" on the 2850 Kinnickinnick parcel to come on to the agenda. Afler the
first ilem of lhe agenda had not been linished, it vras evident that the meeting was
going lo progress slowly. lhad not planned to spending the enlire aflernoon at the
meeting and had to leave. In addition, I rvas frustrated by the fact that I could not iind
anyone in the front office of the building vrho knerv vrhat a "request for vrorksession"
lvas. lf the request was a minorprocedural malter, might it not, more democratically,
have been disposed o{f at the beginning of lhe meeting? ll "a request for rvorksession
is a scheduling matler should it not be slaled as such. In addiiion, I have not received
a mailed notice of the meeiing on 20th Decenrber allhough l.was on your list to receive
a nolice about the initial meeling.
I am unable to altend the meeting on Monday the 201h as I have had prior work
commilmenls for over 4 monlhs, I am very interested in the proposal as I live at 2833
Kinnickinnick #3 and my residence looks out across Kinnickinnick road at the property
in'question.
I am not unfavorably disposed lo the development of the Pedolto parcel as I believe
that suilable development of a significant po.rtion of this land rvitl improve the
Intermcuntian neighborhood. Furthermore, I am very encouraged by the open I
discourse that your department nurlures regarding all of Vaii's planning questions. I
do not feellhat lhave adequale information regarding this.development and, at lhis
time, lamopposedlotheplanasoullinedinyourmemorandumof Dec.'13. lfeellhat
lhe timing of your worksession on this property is most inappropriate. The
neighborhood in question is cerlainly a "rvorking" neighborhood and most residents
wilt be very inconvenienced by this rneeting if, indeed, lhey are able to attend at all.
Should there be any question that the submittal or scheduling of this worksession has,
in any way been affected by the above concerns I will lully pursue my legal
alternalives. ln addition, I rvill become vociferous and obstreperous in my opposition
1o lhe applicants proposal.
i
o o
I feel lhat my rights as a taxpayer and my duties as a citizen havs been violated by
your lack of concern over the Inlermountian residenls' commitment to the fundamentat
business basb of this community. At this time ol year, our seryice to our guesls and the
tourism base must be paramount. I suggest that lhis is an excellent week to consider .
Planning and Zoning matters that atfect our non resident citizens. I hope lhat you can
appreciate my concerns. A prompt reply is requested.
Since
.t
I
INNSBROOK MFJDOWS EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
, WHEREAS.is ihe owner ot
certain property ("the ownea) described as:
("the Propertyli and
WHEREAS, the Orun'er wishes to place certain restrictions on the use of a unit or aDartment
located on the Property for the benefit of the Owner and the Town ol Vail, Cotorado ('the Town').
NOW. THEBEFORE, the Owner does hereby impose, estabtish, acknowtedoe, dectare lor hs
benelit ol all persons who may hereinatter purchase, ol lease, of bold lhe subject land the lo owing
restJiclions, covenanls. and conditions, all ol which shall be deemed lo run with the land and inure lo
lhe benelit and be bonding upon the Owner, its respective grantees, successors, and assigns.
1. Unit or Aparlment
-
containing _ square feet, is hereby restricted as
an Employee Housing Unil (EHU) which must comply with all the provisions of Sections
18.57.020, 18.57.030, and 19.57060 ol the Vait Municioat Code as amended and as
per Section 18.46.220 ol Ordinance No.7, Series ol 1993.
2, The Type lll Employee Housing Unit shall not be leased or rentd lor any period of less
lhan lhirty (30) consecutive days: and. if it sha be rented, il shall be rented onty to
lenanls who are lull time emptoyees who work in _EaglB County. For the purposes of
this paragraph, a tull time emptoyee is one who works an average ol a minimum ol
thirty (30) hours each week.
3. The Type llt EHU shatl not be divided into any lorm ol timeshares, interval ownership,
or lraclional lee ownership as lhose terms are delined in the Municipal Code of the
Town ol Vail,
4. No later than February 1 of each year, the owner ol each employee housing unit within
the Town which is construcled followinq the eftective date ot this ordinance sha submit
two (2) copies ol a repoll of a lorm to be obtained from the comrnunity Oevelopmenl
department, to the Community development Oepa.tment ol the Town of Vail and
By:
Chairman ol the Town of Vail Housing Authoriiy selljng lorth evidence establishing that
each lenanl whom .€sides within their employeo housino unit is a full-lime employee in
Eaole County.
5. The provisions ot lhese feskictiva covenants may be enlorced by ths O ner and lhe
Town.
6. The conditions, reslrictions, sfpulalions, and aoreements conlained herein shall nol b€
waived, abandoned, terminated, or amended except by the written @nsent ol both lho
Town ot Vailland tho Owner ot the property,
TOWN OF VAIL. a Colorado municipal corpotalion
Bob McLaurin, Town Manager
- The loregoing instrumenl was acknowledged betore me lhis
-
day of
Nolary Public
My commission expires:
P,operty Owners
Tha foregoing instrumenl was acknowledged belore m9 this _ day of
Nolary Public
By:
My commission expires:
f,@
=y'rtt*
;"yLf*"If\\F
-\
i,' ..- \\
\
d.44:
HEF{ITAGE
T VCAELE
<-*Q-:=
CAI,LF vr..lrrtl ..7O {cet
.. .. Dtv ?6 6t I'"' 'a
IilV.
r.oi 9
ir ii$i-i
fd !3 rlbor r/oh,nr .cooN'^lY*.,,
i-
()rl
,tQ
N .---1)
7-1
9-CB=86'36' I ffiP
+il
-u.x. Rru sz.aol' --
-..\
i,,.';ir!{)il I Nl U i\4 S ), -
4 9.70w .; .. l'
- -'BM,
(PE
s.E
i ii ii. ft l:,i r..li-;i.i .!".*.i
Ht ji.i;Pir4ii:\iT f'
Comments:
1. Homes at NW and hlE corners of development (#1 and 14)
are 60 feet from pavement at the corners.
2. All driveways to more than two structures have been
widened to the requested 22fieet. TVe believe this to be
excessive in relation to KinnikinnickRoad, which happens
to be 22 fwt wide!
engine turnaround has caused what the developer
feels is ei paving in the SW corner of the site. In the
agroement on this access lhe developer is proposing
an alternate solution of a single to Unit #2 and
accessing Unit fl4 from Kinnikinnick
In reviewing site plan alternatives, it became diflicult to
cluster the homes any tighter without effecting the 20'
parking buffer required in front of garages and the
desired 15' separation between each structure, Units #10
and #13 are probably the only two structures that have
any room to move.
A 6-foot wide pedestrian pathway has been added. The
recommended surface is a thin hard cinder type that
creates a good surface for walking, runningn or strollers.
The intent here is to maintain a natural feel to the
walkway and encourage use of the open space tract. A
wooden walk bridge is proposed for crossing the small
stream.
3.
4.
5.
6. Tentative landscape areas are shown on the site plan.
Again the intent of the developer here is to maintain the
natural character of the meadow with wildflowers and
natural grasses while creating small pockets of evergreen
and aspen trees.
7. Unit #7 has be pulled backto the east to accommodate the
recommendations of the Dames and Moore study. The
Open Space tract has also been enlarged due to comments
made in the report.
lltlilhiltirilirlll,1,tl*ilIirii*ii!it 't{[[
ffi
tlht,llft,lllrtuIlr,hlI[l
ts^-NsS
st
s
s
!o
*=N
JA!R$:r<>-.{FNSddQj
{\
n-\
\
V)
-1"t\
=s}(l
x\)o.-l
II';$ffi"
:'s "oo, a
*b,-il
3s d
s
F-
\
{-
--l
*\
i!t
I
ItI
il
!i,'!
,illlii
ffi
wu*ouz&
rl!!
II!F
! !!t
Ilti
t llr
illl
lcrr
<4ra.-.....-
E
x!
aiI
R
Nn
a
\
N
2a
a
I
Ed
2;-#;EHa IIa,tI
,!
i,lrtt!
i litilr
fril,ii!
I
1
Ei-
;{
2soGul=Jgoz!Eq
. o D . o OO{i!
lr
t
ritri
iti
lltI
if
!
I!
I'I
)
-F6
ulI'F
lto
Fout3
ffi.t.tt
!rln
it!l!
;ilii
tt !\
iii $
iil il-- 3ili I;ii 1lEr l{;r: I{i!! i.
$:
H[l':l$
trH,;:'iff
fftfl'
ti *$ii;*$it:*;ii
fiHi:*$#iffi
*i$iilffi
i *i $iliEi!|iiiiliiiiiliii
<z_<
,fiffiiiffi
o
iriffi$ff|$11
ao
UJ0z
Gt'Fto.@
>'o
IJJ o.>=t?o
=z6Z
u-Ant
lz
-<oJFdoul.otto
!t
F4'u,3-F
oo,
lllIF
=c!
IIJF
ao.4oz
-ttto
J
UJo'E
G
lt.o
uEs, !#i-;!
r!
ii
$
$
r!
fi
:l
r
v:
Ite
rIH
";{cFi
'5z:1.
'j!
.i't
t
{
T
1lli
l{
!g
atti
I
I
rt8
.E
I:(
s
H
tlI
H
IEST
{ffi!""
T
F a )t?gts
{
I
a
PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENI
PEDOTTO PROPERTY
The Pedotto property that is adjacent to Kinnikinick Road in West Vail, Colorado, was inspected
on lanuary 19, 1994, to determine if wetlands occur on the site, and to indicate the approximate
extent of wetlands. Because of extensive snow cover, exact locations of wetland boundaries
could not be determined. However, the presence of wetlands were indicated by plant species
that were evident, and usually occur in wet areas.
A small drainage angles across the properry from south (southeast) to north (northwest), and is
marked by a riparian willow community (Plate 1). Based on the presence of willows (Salix spp.)
and redosier dogwood (Corrus stolonifera), this wetland area varies from 10 to 30 feet wide
along the drainage (see attached map).
A second small wetland may occur southwest of the stream as a small seep. This area was
marked by a small stand (10 to 15' in diameter) of cow parsnip (Heracleum sphottdylium) and
cow bain (Orypolis fendlenJ, which are associated with wet soils (Plate 2). Other plant species
in this area include honeysuckle Q.anicera dioica) and grounded (Senecio serra). Honeyiuckle
is considered to be facultative to both upland and wetland areas, and groundsel is an upland
species. Thus, this area may not meet wetland criteria.
Other parts of the site support an aspen (Populus tremuloida) woodland of trees ranging in DBH
(diameter at breast height) from 2 to 8 inches on the west side of the stream; anO an open or
non-forested (grassland) area occurs on the east side of the drainage @late 3).
Recommendations
It is my recommendation that construction not occur in the area containing cow parsnip that
likely contains a seep in the aspen woodland and in areas adjacent to the stream. Thus, no
"dredge and fill" activity would occur and a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers would not
be required. Moreover, the property should be developed in a way that existing wetlands be
p-rotTted from degradation during and after property development. A buffer area of vegetation
should be developed between building envelopes and the wetlands to reduce the ambunt of
influence that development has on wetlands and on water quality. The buffer should be at least
10 feet wide.
Underground utilities (e.g., sewer line) cross the drainage near the road, which would allow for
a crossing beneath the hydrologic floor of the stream without disturbing the wetland. Tunneling
beneath the stream will need to be done in a manner that maintains stream hydrology and does
not place soil or other material in wetland areas_
; *#ilrjt'i'|;i!4"'
P. Oa
L\-:.-s,
-o.t/
{
lDCr r/etst,aol
te
7t
'-"t--
,. rrrYLt||.{'5.tL
:- -'U**:=#
iR
l,rg
-il.H. RrH5?BO-'..-l|lv. t9,l0w -... ,r.t'
L.Oi- g -*. ,\
!t iJst.f d:olJ0ilt,{tilM s -,- r_
-#
I
,'T'. wr1tnxn gflr@'frW6ox) t-'
Ii - -.;
\
\jr
&
-#,'
Plate 1. Willow-dominated stream that flows southeast to
northwest across the property. Area of property on the left
side ofphoto is non-forested.
Plate 2, A small seep may be indicated by the presence of
cow parsnip and cow bain (cen{er background).
Plate 3. Stream system near property boundary at Kinnikinick Road.
NOTES
)-l
-'fr-V o/'w' 7/'*wt --l^e"Y v'
Y77 n/// "-A' a/Tr c2/
vfw a
-// YS 4
Da./4 4?I.-y t>{ 2'. y / - 7 'y (Y>) ^{"' Y 1"'
-F*Ll"?- (,/*t-w
'.t?/t,t, t
'"d"V'\ t h"*-f t-.n'!.,.- Vw 7 -* "-T J-V+ ? 1J-"', V*-n: si{r}r-s' <\o t14 F
l-wv 't /* -*'^ tT,'^*P 4t4 Vn'/. b -Z 'f dv **T -|.-nv * (g
rzJ i ,h G.t\'77? %4f
"ob (,W
/>t/?€/< g
_7''^// t -{ryZry.r?
/()G Y.:l,l
-l''
rt
TO: MIKE McGEE
-t'=-
GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
]NTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
EARING
coMMENTS NEEDED BY z-14
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
F7ar.** fe^ P/-( A L O L4 Fo
/-A,ur-- ,/.r/ r trte_$ o y' y' dt Sa;l c*,.."n Ienoinffi{ "
/''
""^*,,1J,,7'J ,+ /a fl ." (&n oy',u_.t.
Reviewed ov:ft,*1 * oate: z/ , f /14 fuho,' _Cu,l c.trtn.(
Comments:
L.,r-rs iro.-'f v..rrJ f" ,,-+- - +:/ t'L,o'.L'n-tk]
;"1;{ "1 I 10,, Mo^. +;:'faztsJ' dl y'r'r-,
I ot,r.-tt,\1 ,-" I M/J zz, ln-,. 40
wi at+ ^ .-.-r.,D, ,' Dn ,*, ,.r" ,-, - - ,l V*ft. ^^t
/ {
v'-* zo' q* +.- l,* nJ,-^ [s
r..,-,v , I n y'-yu*"-./
b A,u<-rt ^, | *o^ L *- < i +L ," la,.-.
4r",'|LtL,lt, 'o,,1 + 4 ,r,J gr-. L,.', .p[ue,.,t\ l" &. n =sr5iffi;l- t*' t-*- '"' -p-.-^ (l ' 3t'-'' t:'';-t'T'iJ ,' ,tn^o (
Reviewed ay:-EdJ o, o^te, z/,s/.j fiT\ lr"Tffi .HY
comments:
r ' ltto'". Aa l'teno"JiJ.
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
Fire Dept,:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
,Af, , t L,V l"^ +[
€r te-p ^ f 1te.c L,. e-_ ^.1
Be tlpl o-->ut- ar,-..Q ,-;ll
- Itwcowtr&^'A c,*tb* .\,^+l-^ ^ t,n1 f-rrruv L,^n,. I p.--l
e-ti^r.^,, ^l: - NaaJA'a- da;irL
"--J'-;o,t,.c-,\.-, 1,.^L l"
rt.^ c-t-e 3-.\,., l^rt - r*-1 ,-'-, *l uqo4zc-,\,/, -trrtfu* f{.0"^t SJv, .Ju^r,^' C^-^Lc t-l 6* L+..{
Date:
Distributed to the Fire Department, pubtic Works, and Landsca ping on ?// ,/ y'/ .TT----
It
TO: MIKE McGE
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
\
U
s
\l,t(
{
F
{
I oo-L uLa." lt .--(S d c-ttx<.r {,*
6( .,So z(z+(14Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Gceq Ho\\-Tarri MOt tttrgl-Date: 2llalqA
\/,
F
cs
\
- I re"A ',,,.lttr r{+rer=,+*+-rotrfardS , ,, I L L. nl,^L) o, \ -.t
-ern)<wc-i $.;ce'\-#,c,€rd v r,'ri r ol:faC qo"/ 1^t;l,l nel o'llo't )rq* [" Iu pl^l'-) ot
- , -
czrtanc., d\.r\^)r\; ..* -.',*Jit'l*-t.1q^tt s!Yr, luill'q och4/'t't '' - *rob) sltflL\
*ff?:irTi'fl$f'nYJ:f,K 0 u'"''{ u'k*'tn-' j"-
iil,*{lX' ,},,'L*ffo*'j",ru:f l^ a-ltrrovut- Tt +tL
prJii-,,r'lr' ,li, Ju_' ,ez.&J u-€ ,',LLJ 'Jt^ vecot)tl rcy,',,*),t
**'.,aqe f, gdcstcron €d.tryn lt ) Stift teZpr.td
[andscaping:
Date:
"d*-t?"
shoulh,s, d.-;$t , Jr.rh , inat-, tb?
4^J LcA scoptg lo al'tipl o^7 7r7'c'1 of / ua-|"'/V .
r,.eJs J* tc sho,--,'!"2 h*J Svrl6a-
at
71"^ll ob:n urJ-o",n hou*u - tl *,0 .,..
Pe A.4 r ia-t
uhd.l it
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
?^la
-tL
L"clo* L L aneo^<pl6h
i> ll".l*ro a^- J Jortri..t S,^. J,-,r^'JDate:
Distributed to the Fire Department, Pubtic Works, and Landsc
^ping
on Ala-...----..--.
I
REG HALL
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
acc €sS
TO: MIKE McGEE
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Retum to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
Reviewed by:
Comments:
'/to/. eto-1e.4 oy'
at>"ta_1,*-_r,.-, /r{ 6a /a
Date:
p!r,t
f L{ Sal c,y;- I/'l ." 64nn ^y',tn.t,.{ht, -1u,( c./.-tt-.(v-l tL s i /c..^t _rk 1
ft'4arsJ. if r'I';,
l*.,n" 4t/{
V-ft. ...c-/'1ou*--,/
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:
yV
,.,1""
""*\pror,
{,t ;., r }mr{t'ffi{l tt"dt6(> V:i,,F
z z- j'zt
Atltt
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: >,lq
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
fu*T o&^ P/-r A LQrnE
P,-!.ro_^-
enginffi'/-'
WT,,'ffi"^!*,Jfr'..ba I
T --'/
,t#ry)r;':
#,0* n;y?+
%Y'r'|,).,'1''N 'on,*'t, n
v-r,')," l'i'^,.f,
1"F t *r*bo,t
Comments: t) 2lzz' 4i'" 'az-21
--:: -,4-:" '-o5- 2712n'-:
54. za!-,' /y'"-"'-'
/-../tC 'a'e"tA 7Q 2'' <a'a"a
A z'i ''"''/
.,., 1..p a./.4 r,, . -./jj3tg-t
Ad rZ )/l .d7-'. aE1-/ "/ /74'zz
Distributed to thdFire Department, Public Works, and Landscaping
I
\I
REG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Beturn to Andy Knudtsen
Town Planner
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: Z z-7
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
l r"-L e*'\,-.t f
S td Corx,--r {r-
Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
landscaping:
Date:
Date:
' ..1
I
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed oy@-Date:- / ,- .w7-
comments: F;,'zz ez-/ ,z<'az4 /4'n,'*"- f oi*-/.? /o*/ , V.-z-.-//'/ak,r""- --.2..,/ ,/o/r-'ry-:nn "' 2,;, -*: i"lirs:* ./o /,-'.
z-a '"o,,.-/o " io'/ J'"" ;;') fo;, ,/no/2.,.r- r._u-d
y'z //.s'</ - ZfuzJ''"J / z4'za'a
,/z'- ';'; L'-'o"J 2 4'7d7tttz '/r'/ '
DistdbutedtotheFireDepartment,Pub|icWorks,andLandscaetnson2l,JL.
,VaR Ca/ 4cco-t r d A.-,,- Z,
: MIKE MoGEE
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO: MIKE McGEE GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Retum to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
Engineering:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date:
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:Date:
Comments:
I n--L uGr- Lj n-( Sd c-av*s {,-
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date:
INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
TE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Distributed to the Fire Department, Public Works, and Landsc aping on-dJ3--t'
Pelol--rl
THE VAIL FUND
288 BRIDGE ST.
vArL. co 81657
MICHAEL D. KROHN
P.O. BOX 1517
vArL, co 81658
CHARLES W.H. OVERY
2833 KINNICKINNICK RD, f3
vArL. co 81657
ELEANOR & HELEN FINLAY
P.O. BOX 3032
vAtL, co 81658
DEAN KRAFT
2783 KINNICKINNICK RD. #1
vAtL, co 81657
DANIEL K. GRAVES
P.O. BOX 2011
MARY PECI(SCOTT PETERS
2773 KINNICKINNICK RD. D5
vArL, co 81657
PETER & SUZANNE APOSTOL
2771 KINNICKINNICK RD. G6
vArL, co 81657
CATHERINE ANN HOLONITCH
2833 K|NNICKTNNtCK, #2
vArL, co 81657
SCOTT, SUE, GERALD AND
LAURIE FRITZLER
2823 K|NNTCKTNN|CK, #5
vArL, co 81657
STEVEN MACDONALD
P.O. BOX 2824
vAlL, co 81658
RICHARD & ANNA DEMARCO
2701W.84TH AVE., #205
BILL & DONNA CAYNOSKI
P.O. BOX 3116
vAtL, co 81658
JOYCE & CLINTON DENNIS
3816 WENIG ROAD NE
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52402
MICHELE THRAPP/BEVERLY
ANN VIKLUND
2823 KINNICKINNICK RD. #4
vArL, co 81658
GEORGENE B. PRISCILLA
P.O. BOX 461
vAtL. co 81658
WILLIAM JEFFREY HUNTER
402 E. WASHINGTON ST.
APPLETON, Wl 5491 1-5417
W. VINCENT/F. ISABELL JOLLIFF
2783 KTNNTCKTNNICK ROAD
vAtL, co 81657WESTM|NSTER, CO 80030 VA|L, CO 81658
^ rs.,fl r
a lq l q + - ory oc!-rt.s SrrS- c'-tf a)1\
t r\
GLORIA MEISTER
86 EAST SHORE AVE P.O. BOX 485
GROTON LONG PT, CT 06340 VAIL, CO 81658
RICHARD & EILEEN DUKE KEVIN J. MULVEY
LEO & LAURA MARX
730 MARION
DENVER, CO 80218
MARILYN DOUGHERTY
255 MOHAWK DRIVE
BOULDER, CO 80303
215 MILLINGTON RD
PEEKSILL, NY 10566
T. CHARLES & M. OGILBY
2938 S. FRONTAGE ROAD WEST
vArL. co 81657
TIMBER CREEK LODGE CA PETER & VICTORIA GLADKIN ANDREA FOSTER
P.O. BOX 3478 105 LEE DRIVE 537 69TH STREET
VAIL. CO 81658 CONCORD. MA 01742 HOLMES BEACH, FL 33510
JOHN CONLEY TIMBERCREEK A-4 LTD. LOIS WHATMORE
P.O. BOX 481951 P.O. BOX 181467 4126 GLENMOOR DRIVE
DENVER, CO 80248 DALLAS, TX 75218 CANTON, OH 44718
E. BJARNE BLUME TRUST A. & M. CONNOLLY JAMES & SUSAN MAURER
P.O. BOX 405 2174 E. BRIARHURST 9060 OLD SOUTHWICK PASS
CHEYENNE, WY 82003 HIGHLAND RANCH, CO 80126 ALPHARETTA, GA 30202
DAVID LAIKIN MARIE C. SCHROEDER MARK & CAROL WHYTE
626 TOWNCENTER DRIVE 2821 BASSINGDALE LANE, #2 2821 BASSINGDALE BLVD, #3
JOPPATOWN, MD 21085 VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
ROSS DAVIS RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. ROBERT & ROSALINE JONICK
P.O. BOX 190 "/O COLONIAL SAVINGS & LOAN 2422 KOMO MAI DRIVE
vArL, co 81658 P.O. BOX 2988 PEARL CITY, Hl 96782
FORT WORTH. TX 76113
PAMELA & MAX SCHNELL
P.O. BOX 1424
AVON, CO 81620
WONNE & KEVIN CALABRESE
2531 KINNICKINNICK RD. A1
vAtL. co 81657
JANE SHAPIRO
P.O. BOX 782
vAlL, co 81658
GREGORY LYNN SHARP
13714 FOXMOOR DRIVE
HOUSTON, TX 77069
RICHARD & LORRAINE BENSON
2771 K|NN|CK|NNICK, #E2
vArL, co 81657
PETER CUSHING/ANNEGRET
KESSL HOWE
2821 K|NNTCK|NNTCK, C-3
vArL, co 81657
CONNIE ARCHBOLD
P.O. BOX 2871
vAtL, co 81658
PETER & PATRICIA FRANKE
2712 KINNICKINNICK COURT
vAtL, co 81657
K.E. ANDY/KIMBERLY
ANDERSON
6733 E. STROH ROAD
PARKER, CO 80134
C. HOWE/D. CARLSON
P.O. BOX 2618
vArL, co 81658
WILLIAM & MAUREEN MASLER
2843 KINNICKINNICK RD.. B1
vAtL, co 81657
JAMES R. TOUT, D.G. BRADLEY
53 WIDDICOMBE HILL BLVD,2O6
WESTON, ONTARIO
CANADA, M9R193
C. & C. BERNHARDT
P.O. BOX 2012
vAtL, co 81658
J. & M. HOLROYD/ P. RODGERS
20210 N.57TH WAY
HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021
SHARON L. HECKMAN
2883 KINNICKINNICK RD. D3
vArL, co 81657-4118
EDWARD WALKER
4675 S. YOSEMITE
DENVER, CO 80237
ATROPOS HOUSING CORP.
725 sTH AVENUE
NEWYORK, NY 10022
JOSEPH & CATHERINE CHENEY
P.O. BOX 1094
vArL. co 81658
J. ROSSMAN/1. EASTOM
2773 KINNICKINNICK,4D
vAtL, co 81657
ELLYN MARIE COURTOIS
2821 K|NNICKTNNICK RD. C-l
AVON, CO 81620
NOEL R. HARRIS
P.O. BOX 1192
vAtL, co 81
CHARLES & BEATRICE DEBUS
P.O. BOX 4676
vAtL, co 81658-4676
WALTER ALLEN KNOX
DRAWER 6200
vArL, co 81658
J. & J. HARRISON
P.O. BOX 3513
vArL, co 81658
JAMES & PATRICIA KEPHART
2843 KINNICKINNICK RD, 84
vAlL, co 8't6574125
S. MAYNE/P. ROCHE
2744 BASSINGDALE
vAtL, co 81657
KIT WILLIAMS
605 N. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
TIMBER CREEK CONDO ASSOC. ANN HOWIE G. RODRIGUSR. ALBRIGHT
P.O. BOX 3478 3600 HOLMES 1261 oCEAN FRONT, #C
VAIL, CO 81658 KANSAS CITY, MO 64109 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
PATRICK M. MCCRANN JOHN & JOHN FITZGERALD ANGELA JO, JOE & LARUE
199 EUDORA STREET 4 PENROSE BLVD.SUMREI
DENVER, CO 80220-6313 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 3636 LAKE SHORE DRIVE
80906 HOPE MILLS, NC 28348
ROBERT, LEONARD, TERRELL KEVIN &JOHN KRIEG HENRY & EMMA
AND D. BLODGETT 2743 KINNICKINNICK, A6 MAY PALACE RESTAURANT
4852 S. GARSON STREET VAIL, CO 81657 223 EAST GORE CREEK
AURORA, CO 80015 vAlL, co 81657
ROBERT & GLORIA KENDALL LORI JEAN ZIEGLER
RICHARD GOLLUB LEE & MELODEE CURTES CAMELOT TH ASSOC.
2753 KINNICKINNICK ROAD, 85 5899 SHANNON RD % MIKE CHAPMAN
VAIL, CO 81657-41/+8 HARTFORD, Wl 53027 P.O. BOX 2121
vAtL, co 81658-2121
MERV LAPIN RODNEY GRUBB PANORAMIC HOLDINGS, INC.
232W. MEADOW DR. 10 FAIRWAY DR. 2801 BASSINGDALE BLVD., #2
VAIL, CO 81657 NORTHFIELD, MN 55057 VAIL, CO 81657
JAMES NOWAI(JAMIE TURNER ELIZABETH STENHOUSE
SARA NEWSAM
P.O. BOX 753
vAtL, co 81658
MICHAEL O'MEARA
P.O. BOX 3801
vArL. co 81658
DEVON KING BILLINGS
P.O. BOX 2646
vAtL, co 81658
288 BRIDGE STREET
vArL, co 81657
P.O. BOX 982
vAtL. co 81658
JEANNE RANELL NELSON
P.O. BOX 2121
vAtL, co 81658
P.O. BOX 3173
vAtL. co 81658
470 VILLAGE PLACE, #216
LONGWOOD,FL 32779
Charles Overy Scott FriEler Gregory A. Meister
2833 Kinnickinnick Road, #3 2823 Kinnickinnick Road, #5 P.O. Box 322
Vail, CO 81657 Vail, GO 81657 Vail, CO 81658
Richard Duke Carrie Howe-Cadson Elizabeth Crawford
2923 Kinnickinnick Road, #7 2501 Bassingdale, #6 2801 Bassingdale, #6
Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657
Lonaine Denson Dean Marsh
2TTl Kinnickinnick Road, #E-2 284if Kinnickinnick Road, #b-1
Vail, GO 81657 Vail, CO 81657
o
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PFOPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
tho Town of Vail on February 28, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Munlcipal Building.
In consideratlon of:
1. A request for a major CCI exterior alteration lor the Laughing Monkey to allow an
addition to the south side of the Creekside Building located at 223 East Gore Creek
Drive/a part of Tract A, Block 5-B, Vail Village lst Filing.
Applicant: Jose GuzmanPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
2. A request for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the
Govered Bridge Building located at 227 Bridge StreeULots C and D and a part of Lot
B, Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West PartnersPlanner: Mike Mollica
3. A request for a variance for required parklng to be located off-site for a single family
residence located aI2842 Cortina Lane/Lot 6, Block B, Vail Ridge.
Applicant: Hans WemannPlanner: Randy Stouder
4. A request for a wall helght variance and driveway slope variance to allow for a
drlveway to exceed 8% located at2445 Garmisch DriveAots 10 and 11, Block H, Vail
das Schone 2nd Filing.
Applicant Steve Sheridan and Adam SzpiechPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
5. A request for a variance to allow for a 6 foot fence located in the front setback and a
variance to allow alternative materials not listed in the Design Review Board Guidelines
for a fence located at 5118 Gore Circle/Lot 3, Block 3, Bighom 5th Addition.
Applicant Hobert SchonkwilerPlanner: Randy Stouder
6. A request for a side and rear setback variance to allow for an expansion to the existing
residence located a12757 Davos TrailAot 1, Block F, Vail Das Schone 1st Filing.
Applicant Juergen Krogmann and Monica RothPlanner: Randy Stouder
7. A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
. specifically described as follows:
A Frd ot hrd h tha Sorrthwtd Oud|f of SaAton t,r, Tflmhb 5 gorrdr, Rang| tl W.d d fie Oh Pdn+d M.rldbn. mot| P|||lct Ldy daactt tt s
iolout:
B.Ohnh0 d I potri ift |c I b.|' c.p rtt lo. r rlnda co|rl..lor ll| Wbat Or,||ltr ol dd S.cdoo ra, b-'. (Nonh 2e degri 28 |nhutet 5i rc(f tt
W*q t017 8 tot Drsd) 0lcth 4:l D.efl. 15 mtxrql e r.a dt Wd, 9r5,S ha M.|$rto; llric. t{ofi 74 dtlEt 06 rfiult. 19 t.cu$r E|'l,
t0.76lbd; fhtnc| 189,62 t.rt rlone th| r€ d r curv! !o th. rlgh wtldr tt rdt r|6 r dro.d b.rdrg Nodn 88 dcgrQ 12 mhu.r I !o.on6 Ed,
18f .78 tg|l; fh.o(t soufi 7' &gr!r! a0 mhdr 2l lraondr Ed, 8aZ f.* lific. l4Tialt trli dq|e fi |'c d r qr a !o f|| Llt rfilci .rc ],lbl.odt I
ciord b||'he odh €8 ng.Ir 33 rnlrul.| t7 rcon(t Er3. l€.dt L.g Tham. Noih 70 rhgfrt 6a rthd!! 55 |.codr Era. .{8.55 L.l; Thi|ql 54.'10
f.d ctong thr.n ol I osry. to $. dgh rtldr |,€ ldtr
'3
r .hord b!|dng Sordr,lT d{r6 20 mlnuaa ST lcondr EDl.,l,a.20laat Thlic. Sodh t,a
rhgrec. 25 r' rb! tO sacoo.b W..l |10.51 Ld:
th3nc. goui 88 dte|rlr '18 rlnu6 9l r.coidr w8, 320.@ |!at:
Thonc. North 19 dr0.t6 (', mlntltr 05 t.@ndt W|'t 50lxl lcl:
Inanca Sov$ 7, d.g|rr rg tnlntl(.',ll $o||& Wh, ldr.l8 |Il;
Th.n€. Sorrfi t0 dlgrtr! 53 nlnul.r 33 t oidr wb|t 98,a8 La:
fh.rr. l{o.tt gt d.gt r aO nlnuL C r|€|rda l|,.tl, $t7.?2 har;
ffr c. (t{odh f t d.!|tr 52 n* rL i3 r.con& Erl 130,m hd Daod} No|ti tI d.er-r 56 r*ri|| 3l t cqt& €!L '129,75 l.|l lih||,'t4 lo tr
POINT OF EEGNNNG.
Brrhg trfi Gl.O. rtcod lo. &rrfi hdl d Sadha h brtxrxo 8.qbnr r+la (gl.O. ,rod So{dr 0l drori3 $,2 nlnul|. E||o (gou$ 01 drgt.t 30
mhfts 33 t co0da Erl lL||ur.O
8. A request for a variance from SEction 18.69.040 (Development Restricted) of lhe Vail
Municipal Code to allow for the construction of buildings on slopes greater than 40"/o
located at 4335 Bighom RoacUBlock 3, Bighom 3rd Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Juanita l. Pedotto
Andy Knudtsen
Michael Lauterbach/BAB Partnership
Jim Cumutte
9.. A requ€st for a mlnor subdlvislon located at 4316 Streamside Gircle WesULots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighom 4th Acldition.
Appllcant Walter KlrschPlanner: Randy Stouder
FILE COPT
TOWNOFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Development
Jim and Pat Kephart
2843 Kinnickinnick, #B4
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmentat Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Jim and Pat:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most uP to
date inlormation regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEG meetings;however, it has besn tabled untilthe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1 , 1994 and March 15, 1 994.
Thank you for your interest in this proJect. lf you have any questions about ths schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me al479-2139.
Sincerely,
#44//n
Andy Mudtsen -
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-47e-2 r 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Development
Jo Brown
P. O. Box 906
Vail, GO 81658
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Jo:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Ptanning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it lor earlier
PEC meetings;however, it has been tabled untilthg 28th.
Atter the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1 , 1994 and March 15, 1 994.
Thank you lor your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
#*4 /*'/fu
Andy Knudtsen
Senlor Planner
ft L'#.'
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 r 3 8 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-24s2
February 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Development
Greg Meister
2783 Kinnickinnick, #6
Vail, GO 81657
RE: Planning and Envlronmental Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Greg:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
reviernr on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this leftEr to provide you with the most up to
dats information regarding the review process ol this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled until the 281h.
After the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and Mardl 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. ll you have any guestions aboul the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
4:4 g,-,w1
Andy Knudtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 r 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
D e partment of C ommuniry Deve loprnent
Marjorie Vickers
2633 Kinnickinnich
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission roview of the proposed Pedotto rezonlng
Dear Marjorie:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planntng and Environmental Gommission (PEC)
revie\r, on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date intormation regarding the reviErr process of this prolect. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the project wlll be scheduled at Town Councilfor two readings. These
are tenlatively scheduled lor March 1 , 1994 and March 1 5, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any gusstions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
#J, /*t#a
Andy Knrjdtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Community Development
RobErt & Denyse Sterio
2633 Klnnickinnick
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Robert & Denyse:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled lor a Planning and Environmsntal Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up t0
date information regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been labled untilthe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your inlerest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me al479-2138.
Sincerely,
&.(^4ty'"*(Andy Knu/dtsen
Senior Planner
?
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 47e-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Community Deve lopment
Sue Dugan
2642 Kinnickinnick Ct.
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commisslon revlew of the proposed Pedotto rezoning .
Dear Sue:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Ptannlng and Environmental Commission (PEG)
review on February 28,1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with $e most up to
date information regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled until the 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest ln this project. ll you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincegely,
#44./4\
Andy Knudtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of C ommunity Deve loprnent
Carrie L. Hans-Carlson
2801 Basingdale, #6
Vail, CO 81657 |
RE: Planning and Environmential Commission review of the proposed Pedotlo rezoning
Dear Carrie:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it lor earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this projsct. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me al479'2138.
Sincerely,
.,'t t ,/,l / r / t./Vfrt"L M'*J-fu.\r.//L
Andy Kn0dtsen
Senior Planner
o
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 E / 479-2 I se
FAX 303-479-24s2
February 9, 1994
Department of Community Development
BillSargent
P. O. Box 725
Vail, GO 81658
RE: planning and Environmental Commission review ol the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Bill:
The pedoto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February ig,1g}+. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
Aft6r th€ pEC hearing, ths project will be scheduled at Town Gouncil lor two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled lor March 1, 1994 and March 15' 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about tho schedule or
about tre rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Slncerely,
/ / ) //Vf--{" 6'.- lt't-lry l/ \
Andy Kndtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 E / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Deparnnent of Community Deve lopment
Enrvin Bachrach
P. O. Box 2236
Avon, GO 81620
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of fie proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Erwin:
The Pedotto rezonlng ls scheduled for a Planning and Envlronmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the revielrv process of this project. We had schEduled it for earlier
PEG meetings; however, it has been tabled until the 28th.
After thE PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interEst in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about he rezoning, please call me at479-2138.
Sincerely,
#/, r1/A,
Andy Krtudlsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 t 3E / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-24s2
February 9, 1994
Deparunent of Community Development
David Chapin
P. O. Box 1452
Vail, CO 81658
RE: planning and EnvironmentalCommisslon review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear David:
The pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the review process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
Atter the PEC hearing, the project wilt bE scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1 , 1994 and March 15' 1 994.
Thank you lor your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
t-4 411.
Andy Knudtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Developrnent
Chet V. Hoyos
2801 Basingdale, #3
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Envlronmentral Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Chet:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
rsview on February 28,1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the revlew process of this project. WE had scheduled it lor earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the project will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15' 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
ffi*"?4*1
Senlor Planner
I
TOWNOFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Depanment of Communiry Developnent
Mike O'Meara
2801 Basingdale, #3
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review ol he proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Mike:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
revievv on February 28, 1994. I am writlng you this letter to provlde you with the most up to
date information regarding the revlerr process of this project. We had scheduled it lor earlier
PEG meetings; however, it has been tabled until lhe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the proiect will be scheduled at Town Gouncil for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and Mardt 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
1/)#tF^JvQ
Andy Knddtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
De partment of Community Development
Sara Newsam
P. O. tsox 753
Vail, GO 81658
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of he proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Sara:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
revietrrr on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this lettgr to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the revlew process of this proJect. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetlngs; however, it has been tabled until the 28th.
After the PEC hearing, ths project will be scheduled at Town Council tor two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest In this project. ll you have any questions about the schedule or
about he rszoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
,/ ./ ./#14-4_
^./ /, \Andy Knudtsen
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
3O3 -479-2 I 3 I / 479-2 r 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
Department of Communiry Development
February9, 1994
Peter Franke
2712 Lupine Ct.
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Peter:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled lor a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with lhe most up to
datE information regarding the revienrv process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untll the 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the projsct witl be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your intersst in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me al479-2138.
Sincerely,
//7
W9 f/*414
Anoy tcnudt="n L
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Deve lopment
Chas & Charmayne Bemhardt
P. O. Box 2012
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of Ure proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Chas & Charmayne:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the review process ot this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has besn tabled until the 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the proJect will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled lor March 1, 1994 and Marct 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
#/r H* lvq
Andy Knudfsen I
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
3O3 -479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
Department of Communiry Development
February 9, 1994
Bob & Cindy Callicrate
3073 Bellflower Drive, #2
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of the proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Bob & Cindy:
The Pedofto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
revlew on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the review process ol this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
Afier the PEG hearing, the project wilt be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
//)7f"9 ,4---^ /4
Ancly Knud(en
Senior Planner
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
3Oj -479-2 1 3 I / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Development
Charles Overy
2833 Kinnlckinnick, #3
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commlssion review of the proposed Pedono rezoning
Dear Charles:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the revie$, process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled until the 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the projoct will be scheduled at Town Councll for two readings. Thess
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and March 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this proJect. ll you have any questions about the schedule or
about the rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincere_ly,
// ./-4L //rl > {=
t/
Andy Knudtsdn
Senlor Planner
4t*<
75 South Frontage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
3O3 -479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
February 9, 1994
De partment of Community Deve lopment
Scott Fritzler
2823 Kinnickinnick, #5
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of he proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Scott:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)
review on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most up to
date information regarding the revierrrr process of this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings; however, it has been tabled untilthe 28th.
After the PEC hearing, the proiect will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1, 1994 and Marcfi 15, 1994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schedule or
about ths rezoning, please call me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
##""aac"
Senior Planner
o
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX s03-479-2452
Fobruary 9, 1994
Department of Communiry Deve lopment
Dan BurE
2958 S. Frontage Rd West, #C-6
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Planning and Environmental Commission review of he proposed Pedotto rezoning
Dear Dan:
The Pedotto rezoning is scheduled for a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEG)
revienr on February 28, 1994. I am writing you this letter to provide you with the most uP to
date information regarding the review process ol this project. We had scheduled it for earlier
PEC meetings;however, it has been tabled untilthe 281h.
After the PEC hearing, thE projgct will be scheduled at Town Council for two readings. These
are tentatively scheduled for March 1 , 1994 and Mardt 15, 1 994.
Thank you for your interest in this project. lf you have any questions about the schEdule or
about he rezoning, please call me at 479'2138.
Sincerely,
{^1 al/on
Andy Knudtsen \
Senior Planner
a l?ffEir.? e
IS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on February 14,1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
ln consideration of:
1. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Road and 383 Beaver
Dam Ckcle/Lots 2 & 3, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Annlinrnf. Inhn Trrlorllnhn Trrlor. lr /Flnhorf Trrlor
Planner: Mike Mollica
z. ^ lvqucst lul a wotAscsstu iul a illirjut uutl u rnlror ir.licli1uur I o.rtu >€ruc'un va,tiarrut:
to the Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates
offices located at 520 Lionshead Mal/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing.
Applicant Vail Associates, Inc.Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a worksession for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance
to allow for the expansion of dwelling units at the Lionshead Center Building located at
520 Lionshead Mall, Units 208,209,308 and 309/Lot5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st
Filing.
Applicant: Victor Cano Faro, Transcon Investments, Inc., and Jose Luis
ChainPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle WesVlots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
Applicant Walter KirschPlanner: Randy Stouder
5. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit to be
located at 1 358 Vail Valley DriveiLot 21 , Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing.
Applicant: Chris KempfPlanner: Handy Stouder
6. A request for a worksession to discuss proposed text amendments to Ghapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District; Chapter 18.32, Agricultural and Open
Space District; and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District ol the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant Town of VailPlanner: Jim Curnutte
o
exterior alteration to allow for the
located at227 Eridge StreeULots C and
1st Filing.
and East West Partners
A request for an SDD to allow for the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a
conditional use for the otf-site relocation of three existing employee housing units,
located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows:
i ^.. ^f T...r nn,' .d/l . ^..t ^f irirl a/a^k R.r.l \/2il Villene Firet Filino Counlv of Faole. Slale of
Colorado, more particularly described as follows:
Commeneino al the f\t.rlheest corner of Vail Mllaoe. Firsl Filino: thence Norlh 79"46'00" West alonq the
Southerty line ol U.S. Htghway No. 6 a dtstance of 3tj/.0ti reel to tne l'Jonneast co[ne[ ot sato lracl "t :
thence South 10.14'OO' West along the Easterly line of said Tract "B'; a dislance of 198.31 feet lo the
Southeasterly corner of said Tract ;8"; thence Norlh 79'46'00' Wesl along the Souherly line of said Tract
.8" a distance of 1OO.OO feet to lhe 1ru6 point of beginning thence norlh 09"10'07' West a distance of 41.67
feet: thence South 88"27'11' West a distance of 75.21 feel; lhence Soulh 27'13'37' East of distance of
71.31 feel;th€nce North 57"24'OO'East a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less to the lrue point of beginning.
7.
8.
A request for a worksession for a major CCI
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building
D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail Village
L
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved
exterior alteration proposal for the Sliler Building, 230 Bridge StreeVPart of Lots B and
C, Block 5, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Hillis of Snowmass, lnc.
Mike Mollica
David Smith
Jim Curnutte
Rod and Beth Slifer
Kristan Pritz
10.A request for a minor subdivision and to
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family,
specifically described as follows;
rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
A garcal ol tand h thc Soulhwos Ou|Jl.r ol Sociion la, TovnshF 5 So|'h, R.nOr 8l Wo3i c, the 6lh Pdndpal MeddLn, motE Panicuhriy dgscrbed .s
follows:
Beglhnlng el . polnt rvhcnca . br.sg c.p 6a't to. . wln.rs coner lor th. We3t Ournot d sdd Sedlon la, b...t (Nonh 29 degr€! 28 mhulet 51 gecoodt
W"'st. fOieOS i*r D".d) (Nonh ,t3 De9re6 | 5 mlnuer 02 rcognds We.f. 915.95 t.d Measured): Thence Nonh 7,4 degreos 05 minder 19 seconds East'
10.76 lset: Thenc. t83.62 le6t .bno $a arc ol s flwa to rho rlght whbh .rs 3vbl€ndt . chord b€aring Nonh 88 degrs6 12 mhlnes 30 3econds Eln,
18i.76lect: Thencs Soulh n degre€s 40 tnlnule3 2l second! EaSt,62-2 ls€t ll|encs 1,17,43leel alongthe..c d a c{rrye loftr lell whbh atc sublends r
dod b€.rhg Nonh 86 dggreer 36 mirurer t7 3.conda E.st, l,l5.5o leoli Thorc€ Nonh 70 degreer 52 mlnurgg 55 t.condg E15t, '{J6.55 leel: Thenc. 5l'10
leol rbng $; .rp ol I curv-! lo thc righ wtthh .rc iubtend. r d|ord b€rring Soir$ {7 degreci 20 mlnues 37 sccondt Easl ,1.120 leel: Then6 Soulh 14
deereer 25 mlnuigs 50 t.cDnds W6l I t0.51 lest;
Thenco South 68 dogr.os '18 mlnutet 9l socondt WosL 320.m l..li
Thencr Nonh 19 der.er O mlnd6 05 lecon& We3l5O!0 hot:
Thenca South 77 degreo3 48 dnules 4't t.cond3 WegI 160.18 leel;
Thencr Soutlt l0 deg|ee3 t)3 tilnutes 33 eeconds WesL 36.48l€€l:
Thence Norlh 67 deorees 40 mlnutga 0g secondr We6t, 3i17.72 leel;
Thencr (Nanh lt d;9rees 52 tnhuiBr 13 Eeconds E.s! 130.m leel Dsod) Nonn t I degr.ot 55 mtnutes 3l seconds Ersl. 129.75 teet Me$u.ed) to lhe
POINT OF BEGINNING.
g€.rinol|om G,L.O. record lor Sornh h3lf ol Sodlon lne behy.En Seclbns 1+i5, (G.L.O..eiotd South 01 degrest 30,2 mindes E.st) (Souh 0l dagraes 38
tninuer 32 recpndr East Msasurd)
Aoolicant:Juanita l. Pedotto
a
11. A request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage varlance to allow for an
enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Greek Plaza
Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st
Filing.
Applicant Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom
ArmstrongPlanners: Randy Stouder/Shelly Mello
12. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road EasUan unplatted parcel located between VailVillage 7th Filing
and Vail Villaoe 8th Filinq and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
Applicant: VailValley Medical Center
i,.r,ir,t,r r'.,-1 ..,,--.-.;ri ;i;L::;;;:;l-:;;i;;:'.'
13. A request for preliminary plat approval of a major subdivision (Trappers Flun) on Lots
16, 19 and 21, Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally located north
of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge Subdivision.
. Applicant: John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway DevelopmentPlanner: Jim Curnutte TABLED TO THE MARCH 14, 1994 .
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION MEETING
wffii
75 South Fronmge Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 Richard Duke
t923 Kinnickinnick Road, #7
Vail, CO 81657 flMD FEB 1 Pgl
'rF..,
IS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
OIOD
FEB I D?I
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on February 14, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration of:
1. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Fload and 383 Beaver
Dam Cirele/l ots 2 & 3. Bfnck 3 Vail Villaoe 3rd trilino
Z. ,\ lgqucs{ tut a wut|tscssrlr lul a ltrajut a\.,r1 t Artrlror crtiElauu|| etlu briruduA vq,ri.ir,,,c
to the Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates
offices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
fuplicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
John Tyler/John Tyler, Jr./Robert Tyler
Mike Mollica
Vail Associates, lnc.
Andy Knudtsen
Victor Cano Faro, Transcon lnvestments, lnc., and Jose Luis
Chain
Andy Knudtsen
Chris Kempf '
Randy Stouder
Town of Vail
Jim Curnutte
3. A request for a worksession for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance
to allow for the expansion of dwelling units at the Lionshead Center Building located at
520 Lionshead Mall, Units 208, 209, 308 and 309/Lot 5, Block 1 , Vail Lionshead 1st
Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Walter Kirsch
Randy Stouder
5. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit to be
located at 1358 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 21, Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing.
4- A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle WesULots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
6. A request for a worksession to discuss proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District; Chapter 18.32, Agricultural and Open
Space District; and Ohapter 18.36, Public Use District ol the Vail Municipal Code.
-\:
7.
8.
a
10.
A request for a worksession for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located at227 Bridge StreeVLots C and
D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, VailVillage 1st Filing.
A request for an SDD to allow for the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a
conditional use for the off-site relocation of three existing employee housing units,
lncated et 362Yail Vallev Drive and more soecificallv described as follows:
A part of Tracr'B'and a parl of Mill creek Boad, Vail Village, Firsl Filing, Counly of Eagle, Stale of
Colorado, more partiqJlarly described as follows:
Co.nmencino ?l lhc l'lcrtheast corner of Vail Villaoe. Firsl Filino: thence North 79'46'00" West alonq the
Sournerty line ol U.S. Htghway No. 6 a dtstance ot 3tj/.06 ieet to lne.t'iortneast cc,rnet ol s&o Itact 't ;
thence South 10"14'OO'West along the Easterly line of said Tract "8"; a dislance of 198.31 feet lo lhe
Southeasterly corner of said Tract "B'; thence North 79'46'00' West along the Soulherly line of said Tract
"B'a distance of lOO.OO feet to lhe true point of beginning thenc€ north 09'10'07'West a distance of 41.67
feet; lhence South 8827'11'West a dislance of 75.21 feel; thence Soulh 27'13'37' East of distance of
72.97 teetithence Norlh 57"24'00' East a distancg of 55.11 feet, morg or less to the true Point of beginning.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Mike Mollica
David Smith
Jim Curnutte
Rod and Beth Sliler
Kristan PriE
A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved
exlerior alteration proposal for the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeVPart of Lots B and
C, Block 5, VailVillage 1st Filing.
A request for a minor subdivision and to
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family,
specifically described as follows:
rczone a tract from Primary/Secondary
located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
A Darcst ol hnd h the Sonhwrst Ou.4.r ol Sadion t,a. Tovi,n3hlr 5 Soulh. R.ng. 8l Wost ol lh. 5th Pdndpd Meddhn, mots Parlbuhdy descrbed .3
tollo|is:
geginnlng .t r polnt wi.nc. I brrss c.p ..t tor r vJlnoss cornaf tor lh9 Wg6t Ou.itcr d tdd Scdion 14. be.ri (Nonh i€ degEes 28 mhulel 5l s.cqldg
Wict, tOiS.OS ieer Dc€d) (Nodh 43 Degrcr3 t 5 mlhder 02 re.onds Wc!t, 915.99 leet Mraslred): Thencc Nonh 7a degr.$ 05 minule3 19 3ecohds E.st.
10.76 lesc Thrnca t8lt.€2 le.l .tong lhr .rc ot r ctryg to the dgl whi$ .ro lubtond I cho.d bertlng Nonh 88 de0ne3 12 mhure! 30 $co.r& El'l,
t8t.ZG lret Thenc. South 77 deerees 40 minule! 2t srcond! E.3! 62.77 toeii Thenc. i,U.43leel aloig thc src d 3 cuNe lo lhe lei whlci atE .rblen& I
dtod be.rhg Nonh 86 degreer 36 minutd 17 recoods E$t, t45.60 lr€l; ThetEo Nodh 70 degree! 52 mindes 55 r€condi Essl, {06,55 lest The.lce t4.10
teei .bng tho irs ol s curvl to thc rign whbh rtc rublghd. r dtod b€rring South 47 degre€6 20 nlnde! 37 second! East 44,20 lret lhen€€ Sodh l,t
delre$ 25 nlnvl6 g) tacond! Wsst Ii0.51 leot;
Th.no€ Sodh 68 d|!ree3 18 .r$nute5 91 3ocondE W'31,3iD.m leet
Thenco Nodh tg degreg3 c, mln!,16 05 secon& West.50.00lerl:
Thenr Soulh 77 degGsr 48 rindes 4l lecon6 We5l 160.18 leel:
Thencr Soulh '10 degrr$ 53 mlnde! 33 seconds West, 38.48 leel:
Thgncs Nonh 87 d99r96 40 rnlnulF 06 5e.onds W95l 3117.72 leet;
thenc€ (North t I degrees 52 minu'ter 13 3econds E.sL 130.00 le.i DeeO NoAh I I degre93 55 tnlnues 31 seconds E.s1, 129,75 tsot Mersured) to lh.
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Bgrring lrem c.LO. record lor Souih hrl ol Sedion linr betvreen Secrbm l+15. (G.L.O. recprd South 0l degrees 30,2 mlnute5 Eist) (South 0l deglees 38
minde! 32 6ccond3 E.sl Meatu.edl
Aoolieant:Juanita l. Pedotto
"l'
11. A request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an
enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza
Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek DriveiPart of Block 5-8, VailVillage 1st
Filing.
Applicant Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom
ArmstrongPlanners: Randy Slouder/Shelly Mello
12. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
5oU O. f-rUlLqgt r\uiau Ldsud.rt urplqrtnLr pd.rr,ni rvuqru\r usrrv(ivrl rari "iii.agc Trii liii,,g
and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
Applicant VailValley MedicalCenter
i,..,,,,,.,. !'.,,-r::..--.--,. ;/.;L::;;;::i:;:;;;:'.'
13. A request for preliminary plat approval of a major subdivision (Trappers Run) on Lots
16, 19 and 21 , Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally located north
of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge SuMivision.
. Applicant: John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway Development
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED TO THE MARCH 14, 1994.
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION MEETING
ffii
75 South Frcntage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657 S. MAYNE/P. ROCHE,.- c=.3 'o1274/' BASSTNGDALE
, co 81657,,.^lrJ , --Ct ,r --ft lY.rrL
\ ,r) -vo/qr.-\C' UAri -r-
'vL.^ _-AIA'A
o
s(\
f7
SryII
k).,ukfu-l--J rh"-A\
(qq+ u (
f loa ./ -
4-z&t
W@wEVpicws 'UtAl Ktn"r n/,.,o tN M tck-.
eNySE S-i 6R.ro
fu,,cin.,%ud"rUL
lAuC Chqninth't-Orh;.^
f0,Wr v>ib *,J,rn C-s 6lbzp
^lP, Qr l'{5a0a( 21n$ hcru(r
/(Ot fosr*(nb i3
(t '' " AL
Btc. f,Ntr,ere-
)p4-2<-___,,pffixpzWpffis{
Qrm? frilft5 izrl /rnir ci (hrurclruc"r
ht &rnkr&t &Fit k,,,n lln,ck r<i -&,. aoaltu^l
ltti!,rl
SotB 6r/-/#r--- lfurne Vn ^(2gj3 1q l.;4*.r*'t, + 3 u *' l,
a?23 K;trielU;& r*.9 ,t.*l
z-4 5a S Fr"+*e'l a. + c-G
?" 4-++'?rs'"-\
li I
I nt<r vw fin ra- it
I .-..-'Ja^*-r | 1,r
R"W .,/
% //"
R+3 Ki
^ n) L r,'r; rLR,l j+Rq V.;(
V"iL
J6 3 3 Kr prtt tcJ(/N N /CK
/r a-
* 6 4n k't n r't t cJ<- r nlM lc4<-- q
a{0/ /ot,n7/"o&, t 6
Po Av, ?zf,vntt-,b firu{fr
/(/*,u
$,"a Rn phor*
hL H,pU"tLV&t*-.-.-,-
&<<, Hnsrre
v tto?"S
CHENEV llon t." Jt '.8"49
PAGE 2/Z
TO: Greg Amsden
Andy Knudtsen
FROM: Kay Cheney
2754 Basingdale Blvd.
476-4935
I may not be able to attend the neighborhood meeting thisevening, so I wanted to convey rny fielings on the pioposeddevelopment on the Pedotto pr-cperty.
] havg to say that I don,t understand the opposition nhichis bcing mounted to the deve lopment, sincc -il seerns to rneto convey a very residential feeling, -ohich is what I thinknost people in Intermountain are hoping to have, insofaras j.t is possible with the condorninLum projects atready inthe neighborhood.
f.think- it is e good idea to.build single farnily hones,since that is what, farnilies in VaiI want now thit we arecoming of age. The fanilies that have lived here longenough have grown fror,r renting apartnente, to crningcondoniniurns, then duplexes and ultirnately sinEie fimilvhornes. Regardless of whether or not that is tfie best u-seof our linited space, that is what people want.
Building the homes for sale, rather than rental, also addsto the residentiaL quality of the project.
I thiak the revised site pian appears to be an inprovementaesthetically on the original site plan.
As I mentioned at the sork session in December, my onlyconcern would he that a rezoning to 1ow density nrutti_ianily,so that the nature of the de'zelopnent could no! be changedonce the increased deneity was alproved.
I'm Borry that f might not be abLe to att€nd the meeting,since eo often only.negative voices are heard at thes6neetings. If I can go+- away frorn ny other appornEtnentearly enough, f will be there.
JAN-14-1994 EE:21 ROo CKI'ELL P.AW
rJ!|
ilATE:
i0:
COllPrilY:
oigllrt Conrrrun:G.tion:r Oivicion
Roctrrcll tnternstionat Corporatiin
3000 Biadr Srcet
Suile .C0
Newport Scac$, Cdilomia 9?660
I[L; (714) A33-4655
FAX: (714) 8lJ-6898
Rockwell
lnternational
PAGE ,/ OF
.THIS 1S A FAX TRAI'ISI'IISSION.
I,I.EASE IJELiVER IiII"iEI]IA1.ELY,
REC'0,161-1 14 1994
Fi.X :,&3::__qVf :_&lS4__
!:.
FRCII: Gary B..Ro<lrigue
(4.,Ost 4"f
frop*4 4*
€aa ' 2a6- scr/
.,t--) l,
sut)-i":..ti #-o{-"- ---l:re -%-az,r/ ,rp./- -. -
A9 -a-A B*/ / &:*sterz--J)-r-l/a-.t-:-i/., ..-
TOTAL P.ESl
I '"" 20,e4 16r08 P.01
rlrr l*+
G:, -\?roJ.,?fq.n{\Jr( 5,
*3-11.[Xr.r.- +l-I u:N \"4 ru^o\il.a \o
AMEN.ICAN
uo{'rx Uo.rd d \V+s
\\*r -0 o!.,-+l-I Ac,.,=\'-\\"l-0*"1oI Ac1=tr.
:
toc^-,r\&td )
\J{)r'\E\\ " Gn\.1 c,( \rs
€-Y.-C)dd,rvrt't(
C^eo-
"P\*;Aern -\h- \r:\'n\ qgt"Y-S &O'n\ be\r.rr-ul- T-n\'u. MAtn\Aitri >
U;{-;\ ?ou+,^fi tsqulC b'{- u^a.,noAr
r,,.-vr\s-t' t. M$;qiO[3p* \fd,\^ is"ALlia. fi' c.S.*u s
225 Wall Street Vail, ColorarJo 81657 l3}3't 476'1477 C)trlside Colorado l'800'327-lJ{,
Dear Intermountain Homeowners and Residents;
f am writing to aek everyone to attend a neighborhood meeting at
7:OO PM, Monday, January 17th in the Town of Vail Chambers-
Once again, the Pedotsto property is scbedul-ed to be railroaded
through in an attempt to re-zone from ttre Primary/SecondaTY_tg
Low Deneity Multi-Fimily. If we allow thie to happen, we will have
la buildings wit,h a total of 19 units and pobably 40-45 more cara
epeeding up finnitcinnick Road. There are six driveways proposed
for these l-4 buildings, a1I but, one exiting on Kinnikinnick Road.
A little ludicrous, wouldn't you say!
The total GRFA proposed is 25,900 sg. ft., similiar to the last
proposal just a few yeare ago that we all were most uPset about.
Thig re-zoning request is being made by Tom Campbell, whom I
believe is the eame developer as the last tsime this attemPt was
made--but thie time, aB a repregenEaEive for Mrs. Pedotto, we have
a menber of the PJ.anning and Environmental Commnission--a bit of a
conflict of intereet--wouldn't you say?
Thie same PEC that ie in favor of 25,900 sq. ft. an 2.36 acres,
aeide from up zoning, ie the same commission that recently denied
the development of a 2+acre parcel to t,he East, of Meadow Creek
Condominiums. That request was for a duplex of approximately 6500
sq. ft.(buildable GRFA is over 9,000 sq. ft.). they actually said
they would like to see less GRFA eo iE would encroach less on the
hillside. Oh, and yee, they voted against a ret,aining wa1l for the
driveway. Are they aware that we live in the mountains and that
all of the desirable flat lots are gone. They are going to have to
contend with retaining wa1ls--lj-ke t,he ones juet built in West Vail
to support.. those gigant,ic new duplexes.
In conclusion I would like Mrs. Pedotto to know that if she divided
her Land into lots and builts under the current zoning, no one in
Intermountain would object-tt6 simply object Eo this many
Etructurea, thiE many driveways and the amounb of speeding carE
thau this many occupants would invariably drive.
So don'L forget Monday night at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambere,
Town of Vail officee. See you there.
Bobi
13 r55
MA&\i9KUBO &.
^SSQCTATES
CONSTAUqnO!.-CO}.'S1,1-TAN"|J
ARCHITECTTIRE
December 20,1993
'iti ;
Dcar Mr. tiruiJtsen; i : Iiiiii'
The Cig, of Vail
Plaoning Depanurenti
Vail, Colorade i
ATTrrl: Andv Knudtden : I II -- ,| "|r;t,ri,i
SF.: 2fi50 Kinitickin4ick Road Zorting ;
!!i'
i:iii':iii
Pu$uant to our recerit discussions, I wish'to frrrmally outline iry objections regarding rhe
Pedotto Parcel develQpment plans,' as cunently picsentia.
,{': i .i I i '
Tbe incfease !n density on thb progirty', ccruplcd with thc signifiiant aurount of hard surface
areas, will result in an iricreased run-off. A preliminary invesrigation reveals a gieat de al
of thls run-off'has pote'ltialrto channel itself into the adjacent parcel at thc cxisting Vail
$wim and Tennis Cllrb entiance. ltis increased nrn'off will not only cause problems
associated witli the edtrance; but it will have a negative impact,on thc sire drairrage on the
litrsctute s i mnediate ly idjaqent ts Kjrurickinnick Ro qd.
:
il
The sedond cofrcern which vle haverregarding the increascd density aud the proposed plan,
ielates !o the airchiteitural design *iri.i lr'1.-iog proposed. We highiv reconirnend rhar the
{eveloper softEn the i'ery hard lines ofhis prr:ject,through the ulilization of perinrcrcr earth
bermi;r$, and h geneious initalletiou of eonifers and diciduorls trees to soften rhe visual
impact.,
I wish to advise
However, in the
items nied to be
,l
yori that I am not in objection to the developer's
best:intereit of thb imagd of dct'eloprnent in ihe town
ad{ressa.d :S the,developer.
proposed project.
of Vail, the above
NCRIHVE^ST OF ilcc
efi stls' Rr stRtET, slirE to?
st ar tr,q u,asry^\ord$ l$rot
:c5-6ll.9122
2('({,l.9('.t
CAIIFpIJ'IIA OFFJCE
! 50 PAU'L,\r\NO A'r'E. SIJTTE l9!
a\YrA :,rE5(. CAt.tR'tL\tA S26:5
? I {.5{t.6220
?l+r45.Jn?6 (FA)s'
I
SI',THWEST OFFICE
9i0lR lVtS ST.
HousToN,'IE|\AS ??00?
?!J.6!9.r r 7z
?$4tl.i6rJt (tN(,
:
CCRPORATE OFNCE
t6.t r)a')!,N:Nc snuur
Dar\Gn, c$LclR/\tct 3t2:0
!c;,Ji't,cl00
.''0J.861-E565 (FAX)iFAY)
,t
Qe-\ ,,,fltl'r\'t\a'
This petition is directed to the Town of Vail in reference to
the request to rezone the parcel of land located at 2A3O
Kinnickinrrick. The reason is the time and date at which the meeting
is scheduled. This could not be at a worse time for anyone involved
lrr the tourism business, which encompasses the whole'of Vail.
These property owners are unable to attend the meetlllg aE
scheduled arrd are opposed to the
NAME ADDRESS
I o-,
Charlcs Oveq;'
2833 Kinnickinnick #3
Vail, Colorado 8L657
(303) 479-9133 .
ft,^,Sun, Dec 19, 1993
To The Planning and Environmental Commission, Town of Vail, ,l[,^**\'/
I must lodge, in the strongest possible terms, my protest to your convening a planning \l: l)
and zoning worksession regarding the rezoning of the "Pedotto parcel" in
Intermountain during what is certainly one of the Valley's most busy periods.
I received your notice for an initial meeting on the 13th of December and was able to
. .-, take time to attend. I spent one and one half hours waiting for the "request for
worksession" on the 2850 Kinnickinnick parcel to come on to the agenda. After the
first item of the agenda had not been finished, it was evident that the meeting was
going to progress slowly. I had not planned to spending the entire afternoon at the
meeting and had to leave. ln addition, I was frustrated by the fact that I could not find
anyone in the front office of ihe building who knew what a "request for worksession"
was. lf lhe request was a minor procedural matter, might it not, more democralically,
have been disposed off at the beginning of the meeting? lf "a request for worksession
is a scheduling matter should it not be stated as such. In addition, I have not received
a mailed notice of the meeting on 20th December although l:wES or'l your list to receive
a notice about the initial meeting.
I am unable to attend the meeting on Monday the 20th as I have had prior work
commitments for over 4 monlhs, I am very interested in the proposal as I live at 2833
Kinnickinnick #3 and my residence looks out across Kinnickinnick road at lhe property
in question.
I am not unfavorably disposed to the development of the Pedotto parcel as I believe
that suitable development of a signilicant portion of this land will improve the
Intermcuntian neighborhood. Furlhermore, I am very encouraged by the open
discourse that your department nurtures regarding all of Vail's planning questions. I
do not feelthat I have adequate information regarding this development and, at this
time, I am opposed to lhe plan as outlined in your memorandum of Dec. 13. I feel that
the timing of your worksession on this property is most inappropriate. The
neighborhood in question is certainly a "working" neighborhood and most residents
will be very inconvenienced by this meeting if, indeed, they are able to attend at all.
. Should there be any question that the submittal or scheduling of this worksession has,
in any way been affected by the above concerns I will fully pursue my legal
alternatives. In addition, I will become vocilerous and obstreperous in my opposition
to the applicants proPosal.
I feel that my rights as a taxpayer and my duties as a cilizen have been violated by
your lack of concern over the lntermounlian residents' commitment to the fundamental
business base of this community. At thistime of year, our service to our guests and the
tourisrn base must be paramount. I suggest that this is an excellent week to consider
Planning and Zoning matters that affect our non resident citizens. I hope that you can
appreciate my concerns. A prompt reply is requested.
lug,rrro*Ol€m
]lsat otttnc tttuf tctmtlo
Feb 15, 1994
Andy Knudtsen
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado. 81657
Dear Andy,
Thank you for your letter aboUt the rescheduling of the planning meeting regarding
the Pedotto parcel. I appreciate that you have been keeping us informed as these
dates change.
I hope that we will see a presentation on the 28th that includes some of the input
from the January "Town Meeting" including the reduction in the number of total units
by at least one if not two. As the developer confided to me his margin was lery
comfortable". with the existing density, we should be able to get some sort ol
concession on the density issue. f n addition I hope that we can reduce the total
number of access cuts onto Kinni(kinnick road. I'm sure that the other roads on the
east and west ends of the lot have their difficufties but by putting all of the driveways off
Kinnickinnick it would appear that we are making this road at least as dangerous as
the others if not more so.
I look fonruard to the meeting on the 28th, and thank you again for your help.
Sincerely,
. ^r
. -\-
Charles Overy
(
23698 U.S. Hwy 24, P.O. Bor 10, Mlnlurn, Colorado, 81645
volcc(303) 927-527 4 ler/dete(303)827'576/0
roil tree(800) 448-8808 cmalr7331 1.1130@compuselve.com
fI
PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
PEDOTTO PROPERTY
The Pedotto property that is adjacent to Kinnikinick Road in West Vail, Colorado, was inspected
on fanuary 19,1994, to determine if wetlands occur on the site, and to indicate the approximate
extent of wetlands. Because of extensive snow cover, exact locations of wetland boundaries
could not be determined. However, the presence of wetlands were indicated by plant species
that were evident, and usually occur in wet areas.
A small drainage angles across the property from south (southeast) to north (northwest), and is
marked by a riparian willow community @late 1). Based on thepresence of willows (Salix spp.)
and redosier dogwood (Cornw stolonifera), this wetland area varies from 10 to 30 feet wide
along the drainage (see attached map).
A second small wetland may occur southwest of the stream as a small seep. This area was
marked by a small stand (10 to 15' in diameter) of cow parsnip (Heracleum sphondylium) and
cow bain (Orypolis fendlenJ, which are associated with wet soils (Plate 2). Other plant species
in this area include honeysuckle (Lonicera dioica) and grounded (Senecio serra). Honeysuckle
is considered to be facultative to both upland and wetland areas, and groundsel is an upland
species. Thus, this area may not meet wetland criteria.
Other parts of the site support an aspen (Populus tremuloides) woodland of trees ranging in DBH
(diameter at breast height) from 2 to 8 inches on the west side of the stream; and an open or
non-forested (grassland) area occurs on the east side of the drainage (Plate 3).
Recommendations
It is my recommendation that construction not occur in the area containing cow parsnip that
likely contains a seep in the aspen woodland and in areas adjacent to the stream. Thus, no
"dredge and fill" activity would occur and a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers would not
be required. Moreover, the property should be developed in a way that existing wetlands be
protected from degradation during and after property development. A buffer area ofvegetation
should be developed between building envelopes and the wetlands to reduce the amount of
influence that development has on wetlands and on water quality. The buffer should be at least
10 feet wide.
Underground utilities (e.g., sewer line) cross the drainage near the road, which would allow for
a crossing beneath the hydrologic floor of the stream without disturbing the wetland. Tunneling
beneath the stream will need to be done in a manner that maintains stream hydrology and does
not place soil or other material in wetland areas.
oa-a4-1ss.4 11:e1 ."ffl_"r,?"i.1" .* oAHtrs
r, ,.1fl ,Jr,.r."_. i,, ir,.i 1t11]F, !..i riir"l i. ji{.|..,{ j i,i
i.ii:.i.r[: i i ii]h,{i:iil.?'
& IIOORtr. GALCARY
7. -'
r,@
=fi1:'+
P, Oe
,, 50 {rrt ,
1,
ic
tr
. .. rfry ?.t tt.+ _
. ..r-_ F,
t:= -:=-=
B:N86
.5.
tL
\r
-t{,H. RIM 5?80.' l.ItfV.' ft.tow -.- ,i.,t'
L.or g '-. .\
it iiSi.! ilill,!1tc1rytiJtuf S \,-
L.\Ki
'P,orrvt, --"';r;r r/erirxp li;it
'ii#inn) tE(
cAtr[F,Jt,.,lrrl
t
jr
Plate 1. Willow-dominated stream that flows southeast to
northwest across the property. Area of propcrty on the left
side of photo is non-forested.
)
'..j
L--
Plate 2. A small seep may
cow oarsnio and cow bain
be indicated by the presence of
(center background).
Plate 3. Stream system near property boundary at Kinnikinick Road.
.t\t"
a"
IS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on February 14, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration of:
1. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Road and 383 Beaver
Dam Circle/Lots 2 & 3, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Annlinrni. lnhn Trdo'/ Inhn Tvlor lr /Fn[rort firlar
Planner: Mike Mollica
Z, rr lts:qucs{ lUl a WUI|(Sc:isrUrl iUl a tllaJul UClr uArnrrul il'lftrt.a url o'rtu Jdrudur\ vq,llialrLt,
to the Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates
offices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, lnc.
Planner:Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a worksession for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback'variance
to allow for the expansion of dwelling units at the Lionshead Center Building located at
520 Lionshead Mall, Units 208,209,308 and 309/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 'lst
Filing.
Applicant: Victor Cano Faro, Transcon lnvestments, Inc., and Jose Luis
Chain
Andy Knudtsen
Greenbelt and NaturalOpen Space District; Chapter 18.32, Agricultural and Open
Space District; and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District of the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant Town of Vail
Jim Curnutte
I
Planner:
4. A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle WesVLots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
Applicant: Walter Kirsch
Planner:Randy Stouder
5. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit to be
located at 1358 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 21, Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing'
Applicant Chrls Kempf
Planner:Randy Stouder
6. A request for a worksession lo discuss proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38,
I
Planner:
J1n "f
7.
8.
9.
10.
A request for a worksession for a major CCI
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building
D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail Village
exterior alteration to allow for the
focated at227 Bridge StreeVlots C and
1st Filing.
and East West Partners
A request for an SDD to allow for the redevelopment of the Gornice Building and a
conditional use for the otf-site relocation of three existing employee housing units,
located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A nerr ^f Tr'.r'Q" :,nri e r'za of t\rill Cr^^k Road Vail Villaare. Firsl FilinO. CorrntV of Eaolc. $ate of
Colorado, more particularly described as follows:
Co'nmencino at the f{.dheesl corner of Vail Villaoe. First Filino: thence Norrh 79"46'00'West along the
Southerly line ol U,S. Htghway No. 6 a dtslance of 3ti/.0ti leel to tne.l{onheast corner of saro itact "u ;
thence South 10.14'OO'West along lhe Easterly line of said Tract "B"; a dislance of .198.31 feel lo lhe
Southeastorly corner of said Tract'B'; thenc€ North 79'46'00" West along the Southerly line of said.Tract
'B'a distance of 1OO.OO feet 10 lhe lrue point of beginning thence north 09010'07'West a distance of 41.67
feet; lhencs Soulh 88.27'11' West a distance of 75.21 feeu thence Soulh 27'13'37" East of distance of
?7.37 teeti thonce North 57o24'OO'East a distanco of 55.1 1 feet, morE or less 10 the true point of beginning.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc.
Mike Mollica
David Smith
Jim Curnutte
Rod and Beth Slifer
Kristan Pritz
A request to modity the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved
exterior alteration proposal for the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeVPart of Lots B and
C, Block 5, Vail Village 1st Filing.
A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
spe-cifically described as follows:
A Darcat c{ lrrd h $e SouthwEst Ou|n.l ot Se.don 14, Torvnshh 5 Sovth, R$!. 8l Wosi o{ lh€ 6lh Pdndpe, Meridlan. mole Ptrltcuhtly desc.bed .3
folloltls:
g€glnnhg et 3 pglnl whonca a b..st ctp r.t lga a f,,ln€$ cg.ner lof tha w'st Ou.dcr ot 3dd Sedion 14, boss (Nonh 29 dogrees 2E ttthul$ 5l secdlds
W..t, lOr3.O8 i.et Deod) (Nonh a3 D99re€. 15 nlnd.t 02 Fcondg W.3l 9t5.90leel Me.!ur.O: Thonce No r 74 degracr 05 minvlo! l9 reco.rds Easl.
10.76 L€t lhenca t83.62 fest .bng thr .rc ct a qlwr to thc rlel tbbh.'| rrbl€ndr. chord b€arine Nonh 88 d99r96 l? mhut.t S tscon& €a!|,
tBt.TS leeti TIenEa South 77 d?gree! 40 mlnu€ 21 3econd! Err! 62.2foet; Iiencs 147.43 teet alqrg lhe.rcd r curyetolhs lell whhh rrc 3ublen& r
dtgd b.shg Nonh 88 dolreot 36 |nin ot t7 sgcmdr Easr. u5.60 tc€t Thenco Nodh 70 d99r93! 52 mhulg3 55 $gcondr E$ , ,00€.55lea: Thencr 31.10
Li tbng tha .rc of I cudr lo the dghl whlch .rc srbtands r dto.d b€rrlng Soulh 47 d.gr$a 20 rninu6 37 tecondt Eat! .1,120l!!t lhenca Soui la
drgr.6 25 mlnder 50 r..ond3 Wost I t0.51 f|ll;
Thenc. Sodh 68 dclroer 18 r{nuter 91 3e.ondt W.sl. 320.0 lool:
Thsnco North 19 dsgre$ 07 mlnul3| 05 leconds Wesl 50.m bd:
Thonc! Sourh 7l dogrres a8 rnlntno3 4l r€cond! We{ 160.18 ld;
Thlncr Sodi 10 degr.or n3 r{nute3 3il secon& WesL 36.48leii
Th3rcr Nonh 87 degfsos 40 mln|n€r 06 teconde W.!1, 337.72le€ti
Thehca (Nodh t t deglges 52 mhutir 13 secondi Erst 130.q' le€t DeeO North | | &grees 55 mln ter 3t roconds East 129.75 leel Mdsured) lo lho
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Barrhi lrom c.LO. record lor Sovth h.I d Scdlon !n€ bemeen Sectlon! t+15. (G.L.O, record Sourh 0l degres 30.2 hlnules Eatt) (Sodh 0l dcgEa! 38
mhutgt 32 |rcoidt E.st Me$ur€d)
Aoplicant:Juanita l. Pedotto
t'
11. A request for a minor exterior alteraUon and a site coverage variance to allow for an
enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Greek Plaza
Building, specilically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-8, VailVillage 1st
Filing.
Applicant Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom
Armstrong
Planners: Flandy Stouder/Shelly Mello
12. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road EasUan unplatted parcellocated between VailVillage 7th Filing
and Vail Villaqe 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
Applicant: VailValley Medical Center
ii.^,,,,r,, . ;*,-1 ,.,.--.-.r,, ;':.::-:l ;::::l:;:l':::'.'
13. A request for preliminary plat approval of a major subdivision (Trappers Run) on Lots
16, 19 and 21 , Section 14, Township 5 South, Fange 81 West, generally located north
of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge Subdivision.
. Applicant: John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway Development
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED TO THE MARCH 14, 1994 .
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION MEETING '
,n-,ft\\*As/"i
awN0FVArLly
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657i ELL
2821 K
AVON,
P*"/ry, )
#.4f,1'tt'+
Greg Meister
2783 Kinnickinnick, #6
Vail, CO 81657
Sue Dugan
2642 Kinnickinnick Ct.
Vail, CO 81657
Enrvin Bachrach
P. O. Box 2236
Avon, CO 81620
Mike O'Meara
2801 Basingdale, #3
Vail, CO 81657
Chas & Charmayne Bernhardt
P. O. Box 2012
Vail. CO 81658
Scott Fritzler
2823 Kinnickinnick, #5
Vail. CO 81657
Jim and Pat Kephart
2843 Kinnickinnick, #B4
Vail. CO 81657
Marjorie Vickers
2633 Kinnickinnich
Vail, CO 81657
Carrie L. Hans-Garlson
2801 Basingdale, #6
Vail, CO 81657
David Chapin
P. O. Box 1452
Vail, CO 81658
Sara Newsam
P. O. Box 753
Vail, GO 81658
Bob & Cindy Callicrate
3073 Bellflower Drive, f2
Vail, CO 81657
o tVa
Dan Burtz Dur '
2958 S. Frontage Rd West, #C-6
Vail, CO 81657
Jo Brown
P. O. Box 906
Vail. CO 81658
Robert & Denyse Sterio
2633 Kinnickinnick
Vail, CO 81657
BillSargent
P. O. Box 725
Vail, GO 81658
Ghet V. Hoyos
2801 Basingdale, #3
Vail, CO 81657
Peter Franke
2712 Lupine Ct.
Vail, CO 81657
Charles Overy
2833 Kinnickinnick, #3
Vail, CO 81657
't o
INNSBRUCK MEADOWS
Phasing Program
Phase I:
Units #l - 6 and #14.
Unit #4 will contain one deed restricted EIIU.
Phase II:
Units #7 - 13.
Units #10 and #11will each contain one deed restricted
EHU.
Construction time frames witl depend on sales activity and
availability of labor. It is the intent of the developer to break
ground in Mav' 1994, and complete construction by X'ebruarv.
199s.
\C
INNSBRUCK MEADOJUS
Unit Tvnes
Tvpe A: 1,650 sq.ft(GRf'A) 3-BR' 2.5 bath home with
2-car garage and attached 480 sq.ft-(GRFA)
1-B& 1 bath EHU.
Twe B: 1,650 sq.ft(GRFA) 3-BR' 2.5 bath single -family
home with 2-car garage.
Tyne C: Same as Unit A except no deed restriction on
l-BR apartment"
Type D: 2,050 sq.ft(GRf'A) 3-B& family room' 3.5 bath
home with 2-car garage and attached 480 sq.ft
l-BR apartment (no deed restriction).
Type A 3 Units Unit #4' 10 and 11.
Type B 9 Units Unit #2n 3, 5, 6, 7r8r9rl2
and 14.
Type C 1 Unit Unit #13.
Type D I Unit Unit #1.
Comments:
1. Homes at IIITV and I\E corners of development (#1 and 14)
are 60 feet from pavement at the cornenL
2. AII driveways to more than two structures have been
widened to the requested 22 feet. We believe this to be
excessive in relation to KinniHnnickRoad' which happens
to be 22 feet wide!
3. The fire engine turnaround has caused what the developer
feels is excessive paving in the SW corner of the site. In the
event the neighboring properties do not reach a mutual
agreement on this access drivg the developer is proposing
an alternate solution of a single driveway to Unit #2 and
accessing Unit #4 from KinnikinnickRoad.
4. In reviewing site plan alternatives, it became difficult to
cluster the homes any tighter without effecting the 20'
parking buffer required in front of garages and the
desired 15' separation between each structure. Units #10
and #13 are probably the only two structures that have
any room to move.
5. A 6-foot wide pedestrian pathway has been added. The
recommended surface is a thin hard cinder type that
creates a good surface for walking, running, or strollers.
The intent here is to maintain a natural feel to the
walkway and encourage use of the open space tract A
wooden walk bridge is proposed for crossing the small
stream.
6. Tentative landscape areas are shown on the site plan.
Again the intent of the developer here is to maintain the
natural character of the meadow with wildflowen and
natural grasses while creating small pockets of evergreen
and aspen trees.
7. Unit #7 has be pulled backto the east to accommodate the
recommendations of the Dames and Moore study. The
Open Space tract has also been enlarged due to comments
made in the report.
{I
=xrn
oo
mm
o
TJmo
-
t-
{ogg
o't.U
mz
-m
=rnn
l=lm
l?0lelml-tt>
l3lmlz
lo'trlildF5l€L
lfJF€lx
$la-l
I
o
{m
a,c
TD
{{m0
oo
=
mz-{a,zmm0mo
TD
ID4
m-Tl
Imac)I,
1'{6z
o-r1
-{-m-It
To-Ito
@
r
m
=9.
=hts
,f il s"YP--f
N..
{qFoi$i{
\
ofroo:l
=dR€xo=o.?. ct
no
6'€oo.('
c)o
3
3(D5
u,
9# +ts.oaHsF.;::
o
=o,
atoglp.
=GI
(f
a
5.ctc
@
CL
cl
J(D
f!
6
ct(D.lt
0,
=3(D
=f.It
cg
o
€o*
-(rt
A'Jor
A'l
CLooglT'5'(o
o.:I
I
Ir$
l\-
NI
-l _\
I
I
I
.N\
F(\
\s'
\t
J
*
>
t'\a
s.I
"N) "'\
TJ\8l+sq i^t(l\
so
o
D)o
o
F'
(D
s\
\\r\|\f
x
{,
Is
)ro
t r;$
\tf*F\
$Aj
Ift
\l$\J\
\\$I
.\
* Deuss e. MoonE
1125 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE I2OO, DENVER, COLORADO 80202-2027
(303) 294-9100 FAX: (303) 299-7901
January 2I,1994
Community Develorpment
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Attn: Mr. Andrew Knutdsen
Re: Wetland Analysis - Pedotto Property
West Vail
Dear Mr. Knudtsen:
RECD JAN 2 419'$r
Fldre: 02442-O5O
The above-referenced property was inspected on January 19, 1994, to determine whether
wetlands occur on the site. This inqpection was conducted with Greg Amsden of Christopher
Denton Real Estate and Russell Forest, Town of Vail staff.
This analysis must be considered preliminary because of snow, which covered most understory
vegetation. Therefore, shmbs and trees were used to indicate potential wetland areas, along with
site hydrology along a stream.
The results of the field inqpection are provided in the attached letter report.
Please contact me Lt l-299-7836 if you have questions on the inforrration provided herein.
cc: Greg Amsden
LRH:E€o
p:\vril\pcdooouttol
Enclosure
OFFICES \VORLDVIDE
PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
PEDOTTO PROPERTY
The Pedotto property that is adjacent to Kinnikinick Road in West Vail, Colorado, was inspected
on January 19,1994, to determine if wetlands occur on the site, and to indicate the approximate
extent of wetlands. Because of extensive snow cover, exact locations of wetland boundaries
could not be determined. However, the presence of wetlands were indicated by plant species
that were evident, and usually occur in wet areas.
A small drainage angles across the property from south (southeast) to north (northwest), and is
marked by a riparian willow community @ate 1). Based on the presence of willows (Salix spp.)
and redosier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera), this wetland area varies from 10 to 30 feet wide
along the drainage (see attached map).
A second small wetland may occur southwest of the stream as a small seep. This area was
marked by a small stand (10 to 15' in diameter) of cow parsnip (Ileracleum sphondylium) and
cow bain (Orypolis fendleri), which are associated with wet soils (Plate 2). Other plant species
in this area include honeysuckle (Lonicera dioica) and grounded (Senecio serral. Honeysuckle
is considered to be facultative to both upland and wetland areas, and groundsel is an upland
species. Thus, this area may not meet wetland criteria.
Other parts of the site support an aspen (Populus tremuloides) woodland of trees ranging in DBH
(diameter at breast height) from 2 to 8 inches on the west side of the stream; and an open or
non-forested (grassland) area occurs on the east side of the drainage (Plate 3).
Recommendations
It is my recommendation that construction not occur in the area containing cow parsnip that
likely contains a seep in the aspen woodland and in areas adjacent to the stream. Thus, no
"dredge and fill" activity would occur and a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers would not
be required. Moreover, the property should be developed in a way that existing wetlands be
protected from degradation during and after property development. A buffer area of vegetation
should be developed between building envelopes and the wetlands to reduce the amount of
influence that development has on wetlands and on water quality. The buffer should be at least
10 feet wide.
Underground utilities (e.g., sewer line) cross the drainage near the road, which would allow for
a crossing beneath the hydrologic floor of the stream without disturbing the wetland. Tunneling
beneath the sheam will need to be done in a manner that maintains stream hydrology and does
not place soil or other material in wetland areas.
r!1..u:..:<. .+
o"'
i: ni il l_iii.,# *l;t,.,'',
CAIJLF VtltrrltHEKIT^GE
T V.CAELE , 5O fce'i ,
-:.-.--\r":.--=-\i-
-__rt -
' O-CB=86'36',1
d,
t/otyn .coe- g
-4';-fr(oytF.
,:..f
\.r _a-
-.BM:
( P€I
S.Er
.'...'
'/--;
-..--
o
^sV;P{Og4:;ffi:
ffi
Ld
I
ilI
'fl
tsay#q]\'- >J4-
s uoFt
titv. 4 9.lO w
!..i)i'9
ii ij$i'i i:iii,li)illll!Uir4 S
Plate 3. Stream system near property boundary at Kinnikinick Road.
Plate 1. Willow-dominated stream that flows southeast to
northwest across the property. Area of property on the left
side of ohoto is non-forested.
Plate 2. A small seep may be indicated by the presence of
cow parsnip and cow bain (center background).
o
RE
II25 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE 1200, DENVER, COLORADO 8/J2A2-2027
(303) 294-9100 FAx: (303) 299-79ol
January 21,1994
Community Develqment
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Attn: Mr. Andrew Knutdsen
Re: Wetland Analysis - Pedotto Property
west vail
Dear Mr. Knudtsen:
Dauns & Moo
File: 02442-050
The above-referenced property was inqpected on January 19, 1994, to determine whether
wetlands occur on the site. This inspection was conducted with Greg Amsden of Christopher
Denton Real Estate and Russell Forest, Town of Vail staff.
Ttris analysis must be considered prelininary because of snow, which covered most understory
vegetation. Therefore, shnrbs and trees were used to indicate potential wetland areas, along with
site hydrology along a strqrm.
The results of the field inqpection are provided in the attached letter rcItort.
Please contact me at l-299-7836 if you have questions on the information provided herein.
cc: Greg Amsden
LnH:@
p:WlinFddouttol
Sincerel
Enclosure
omcgs q,roRLDt*,tlDE
rl
MARY PECIVSCOTT PETERS THE VAIL FUND
2773 KINNICKINNICK RD. D5 288 BRIDGE ST.
RICHARD & ANNA DEMARCO DANIEL K. GRAVES
2701 W.84TH AVE., #205 P.O. BOX 2011
WESTMTNSTER. CO 80030 VAIL, CO 81658
*o ifli
vArL. co 81657 vAtL. co 81657
PETER & SUZANNE APOSTOL MICHAEL D. KROHN JOYCE & CLINTON DENNIS
2771 KINNICKINNICK RD, G6 P.O. BOX 1517 3816 WENIG ROAD NE
vAlL, co 81657 VAIL, CO 81658 CEDAR RAPIDS, tA 52402
CATHERINE ANN HOLONITCH CHARLES W.H. OVERY MICHELE THRAPP/BEVERLY
2833 KINNICKINNICK, #2 2833 KINNICKINNICK BD, #3 ANN VIKLUND
vArL, co 81657 VAIL, CO 81657 2823 KINNICKINNICK RD, #4
vArL, co 81658
SCOTT, SUE, GERALD AND ELEANOR & HELEN FINLAY GEORGENE B. PRISCILLA
LAURIE FRITZLER P.O. BOX 3032 P.O. BOX 461
2823 K|NN|CK|NN|CK, #5 VA|L, CO 81658 VAIL, CO 81658
vAtL, co 81657
STEVEN MACDONALD DEAN KRAFT WILLIAM JEFFREY HUNTER
P.O. BOX 2824 2783 KINNICKINNICK RD, #1 402E. WASHINGTON ST.
vAlL. co 81658 VAIL, CO 81657 APPLETON, Wl 54911-5417
BILL & DONNA CAYNOSKI
P.O. BOX 3116
vAtL, co 81658
W. VINCENT/F. ISABELL JOLLIFF
2783 KINNICKINNICK ROAD
vArL, co 81657
t/a/pl q4- odfLclrfs ,s{r-r G-rr S\ \
GLORIA MEISTER RICHARD & EILEEN DUKE KEVIN J. MULVEY
86 EAST SHORE AVE P.O. BOX 485 215 MILLINGTON RD
GROTON LONG PT, CT 06340 VAIL, CO 81658 PEEKSILL, NY 10566
LEO & LAURA MARX
730 MARION
DENVER, CO 80218
MARILYN DOUGHERW
255 MOHAWK DRIVE
BOULDER, CO 80303
T. CHARLES & M. OGILBY
2938 S. FRONTAGE ROAD WEST
vAtL. co 81657
TIMBER CREEK LODGE CA PETER & VICTORIA GLADKIN ANDREA FOSTER
P.O. BOX 3478 105 LEE DRIVE 537 69TH STREET
VAIL. CO 81658 CONCORD, MA 01742 HOLMES BEACH, FL 33510
JOHN CONLEY TIMBERCREEK A.4 LTD. LOIS WHATMORE
P.O. BOX 481951 P.O. BOX 181467 4126 GLENMOOR DRIVE
DENVER, CO 80248 DALLAS, TX 75218 CANTON, OH 44718
E. BJARNE BLUME TRUST A. & M. CONNOLLY JAMES & SUSAN MAURER
P.O. BOX4O5 2174E. BRIARHURST 9060 OLD SOUTHWICK PASS
CHEYENNE, WY 82003 HIGHLAND RANCH, CO 80126 ALPHARETTA, GA 30202
DAVID LAIKIN MARIE C. SCHROEDER MARK & CAROL WHYTE
626 TOWNCENTER DRIVE 2821 BASSINGDALE LANE, #2 2821 BASSINGDALE BLVD, #3
JOPPATOWN, MD 21085 VAIL, CO 81657 VAIL, CO 81657
ROSS DAVIS RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. ROBERT & ROSALINE JONICK
P.O. BOX 190 o/o COLONIAL SAVINGS & LOAN 2422KOMO MAI DRIVE
vAtL, co 81658 P.O. BOX 2988 PEARL CITY, Hl 96782
FORT WORTH. TX 76113
PAMELA & MAX SCHNELL
P.O. BOX 1424
AVON, CO 81620
WONNE & KEVIN CALABRESE
2531 KINNICKINNICK RD. A1
vArL, co 81657
JANE SHAPIRO
P.O. BOX 782
vArL, co 81658
GREGORY LYNN SHARP
13714 FOXMOOR DRIVE
HOUSTON, TX 77069
RICHARD & LORRAINE BENSON
2771 K|NN|CK|NN|CK, #E2
vArL, co 81657
PETER CUSHING/ANNEGRET
KESSL HOWE
2821 KINN|CKTNN|CK, C-3
vArL, co 91657
CONNIE ARCHBOLD
P.O. BOX 2871
vArL, GO 81658
PETER & PATRICIA FRANKE
2712 KINNICKINNICK COURT
vArL, co 81657
K.E. ANDY/KIMBERLY
ANDERSON
6733 E. STROH ROAD
PARKER, CO 80134
C. HOWE/D. CARLSON
P.O. BOX 2618
vArL, co 81658
WILLIAM & MAUBEEN MASLER
2843 KINNICKINNICK RD.. B1
vArL, co 81657
JAMES R. TOUT, D.G. BRADLEY
53 WIDDICOMBE HILL BLVD.2O6
WESTON, ONTARIO
CANADA, M9R193
C. & C. BERNHARDT
P.O. BOX 2012
vArL, co 81658
J. & M. HOLROYD/ P. RODGERS
20210 N.57TH WAY
HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021
SHARON L. HECKMAN
2883 KINNICKINNICK RD, D3
vAtL, co 81657-4118
EDWARD WALKER
4675 S. YOSEMITE
DENVER, CO 80237
ATROPOS HOUSING CORP.
725
'TH
AVENUE
NEWYORK, NY 10022
JOSEPH & CATHERINE CHENEY
P.O. BOX 1094
vAtL, co 81658
J. ROSSMAWL. EASTOM
2773 KINNICKINNICK,4D
vArL, co 81657
ELLYN MARIE COURTOIS
2821 KTNNTCKTNNTCK RD, C-1
AVON, CO 81620
NOEL R. HARRIS
P.O. BOX 1192
vArL, co 81
CHARLES & BEATRICE DEBUS
P.O. BOX,4676
vAtL, co 81658-4676
WALTER ALLEN KNOX
DRAWER 6200
vAtL, co 81658
J. & J. HARRISON
P.O. BOX 3513
vAtL, co 81658
JAMES & PATRICIA KEPHART
2843 KINNICKINNICK RD, 84
vAtL, co 81657-4125
S. MAYNE/P. ROCHE
2744 BASSINGDALE
vArL, co 81657
KIT WILLIAMS
605 N. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
TIMBER CREEK CONDO ASSOC.
P.O. BOX 3478
vAtL. co 81658
PATRICK M. MCCRANN
199 EUDORA STREET
DENVER, CO 80220-6313
ROBERT, LEONARD, TERRELL
AND D. BLODGETT
4852 S. CARSON STREET
AURORA, CO 80015
SARA NEWSAM
P.O. BOX 753
vAlL, co 81658
RICHARD GOLLUB
2753 KINNICKINNICK ROAD, 85
vAtL, co 81657-4148
MERV LAPIN
232W. MEADOW DR.
vAtL. co 81657
MICHAEL O'MEARA
P.O. BOX 3801
vAtL, co 81658
DEVON KING BILLINGS
P.O. BOX 2646
vAtL, co 81658
ANN HOWIE
3600 HOLMES
KANSAS CITY, MO 64109
JOHN & JOHN FITZGERALD
4 PENROSE BLVD.
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
80906
KEVIN & JOHN KRIEG
2743 KINNICKINNICK, A6
vArL, co 81657
ROBERT & GLORIA KENDALL
288 BRIDGE STREET
vAtL, co 81657
LEE & MELODEE CURTES
5899 SHANNON RD
HARTFORD, WI 53027
RODNEY GRUBB
10 FAIRWAY DR.
NORTHFIELD, MN 55057
JAMES NOWAIVJAMIE TURNER
P.O. BOX 982
vAtL, co 81658
JEANNE RANELL NELSON
P.O. BOX 2121
vAtL, co 81658
G. RODRIGUE/R. ALBRIGHT
1261 OCEAN FRONT, #C
LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
ANGELA JO, JOE & LARUE
SUMREI
3636 LAKE SHORE DRIVE
HOPE MILLS, NC 28348
HENRY & EMMA
MAY PALACE RESTAURANT
223 EAST GORE CREEK
vArL, co 81657
LORIJEAN ZIEGLER
P.O. BOX 3173
vAlL, co 81658
CAMELOT TH ASSOC.
% MIKE CHAPMAN
P.O. BOX 2121
vArL, co 81658-2121
PANORAMIC HOLDINGS, INC.
2801 BASSINGDALE BLVD., #2
vArL, co 81657
ELIZABETH STENHOUSE
470 VILLAGE PLACE, #216
LONGWOOD,FL 32775
(
Charles Overy Scott FriEler Gregory A. Meister
2833 Kinnickinnick Road, f3 2823 Kinnickinnick Road, #5 P.O. Box 322
Vail, GO 81657 Vail, GO 81657 Vail, CO 81658
Richard Duke Carrie Howe-Cadson Elizabeth Grawford
2923 Kinnickinnick Road, #7 2501 Bassingdale, #6 2801 Bassingdale, #6
Vail, GO 81657 Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657
Lonaine Denson Dean Marsh
2771 Kinnickinnick Road, #E-2 2843 Kinnickinnick Road, #b-1
Vail, CO 81657 Vail, CO 81657
IS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of tha Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on February 14, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
In consideration of:
1. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Road and 383 Beaver
Dam Circle/Lots 2 & 3, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing.
Applicant: John Tyler/John Tyler, Jr./Robert Tyler
Planner: Mike Mollica
z. A tc;LluUSi. lul a woltts|csslurt lul d illajul \-,vI ri^rrrr rrJr alrt'l4uurr cutu >c[Jdur\ uotiqt,,-,;
to the Lionshead Center Building to allow lor the expansion of the Vail Associates
offices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead lst Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc.Planner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request for a worksession for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance
to allow for the expansion of dwelling units at the Lionshead Center Building located at
520 Lionshead Mall, Units 208, 209, 308 and 309/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st
Filing.
Applicant: Victor Cano Faro, Transcon Investments, Inc., and Jose Luis
ChainPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle WesULots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition.
Applicant: Walter Kirsch
Planner: Randy Stouder
5. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit to be
located at 1358 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 21, Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing.
Applicant Chris KempfPlanner: Randy Stouder
6. A request for a worksesslon to discuss proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District; Chapter 18.32, Agricultural and Open
Space District; and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District of the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant Town of Vail
Planner: Jim Curnutte
7.
8.
o
10.
A request for a worksession for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the
redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located a1227 Bridge StreeuLots C and
D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing.
A request for an SDD to allow for the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a
conditional use for the otf-site relocation of three existing employee housing units,
located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows:
A part of Tract "8" and a part of Mill Greek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, $ate of
Colorado, more particularly described as follows;
Commencino 2t lhe flnrlheast corner of Vail Mllaoe. Firsl Filino: lhence North 79'46'00" West alonq the
Soulnerty line ot U.S. Htghway No. 6 a Otstance ot 3t,/.oti teet to tne. Nortneast colner of sao lract b ;
thence South 10"14'OO'West along the Easterly line of said Traa "8"; a dislance of 198.31 feet to the
Southeasterly cornEr of said Tracl "B'; lhonce North 79'46'00" West along the Southerly line of said Tract
"8" a distance of 100.00 feet to the true point of beginning thence north 09o10'07" West a distance of 41.67
feel; lhence South 88.27'11' Wesl a distance of 75.2'l feel; thence South 27'13'37" East of distance of
77.37 leet thence North 57"24'00" East a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less lo the true point of beginning.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners
Mike Mollica
David Smith
Jim Curnutte
Rod and Beth Slifer
Kristan PriE
A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved
exterior alteration proposal for the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeVPart of Lots B and
C, Block 5, VailVillage 1st Filing.
A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary
Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more
specifically described as follows:
A prrcal of hnd In th. Southwest Ou.ner ol Sgdion 1,0, toflrshh 5 South, R.nge 8l W.st d the Oh PdndpC M.tldLn, mors prnlcuhdy desqb€d .5
follosrs:
Bqgtnnlng al . polnt whenca I b,rasG c.p s.t tor a wllness comff for lh9 We6t Ouaner ol sdd Sedlon 14 b€{s (Nonh 29 dggr€es 28 mhulos 5l socqld5
W€st, 1073.(8 leel Deod) (Nodh 4:] D€gree. | 5 mindes 02 reconds West, 0i5.96 loet Moasureoi llenc. Nonh 74 dog.o6 05 minutea lg seconds E$t.
10,75 lqef Thence I lxl,52 leet alo.O tho .rc of . qrry. to tho dghl whbh rn subtsn(b a chod be.in! Nonh 88 de!6€3 12 mhu€. g) lecond3 E.t.
tBt.T6teet; Thencq Sourh n deg€es 40 minutF 21 secon& East,82.// le€l; Thonce 147.43iee|along the arc ol a cu etoth! lett whbh atc a$lendt a
dtod bs.rhg Nonh 86 degr.og 36 minures 17 s€condr East. 1,15.601e€t: Thgn@ Nodh 70 d.grest 52 mhute3 55 6econds Eest, ,108.55 le.t; Thsica 54.10
teet stong th€ sE d I curvo to the doht which .rc aubteo6 . drord bo.ring Soulh ,[7 d€greG 20 mlnne3 37 s.con& Eagt 4,0.20lc.t; Thencs S()!nh l.a
degre$ 25 mlnutEs 50 soconds W.sl I i0.51 legt:
Thonci South 68 daglEe6 18 ninutsg 9l goconds W|3L 320.m lgell
Thsnco llonh t9 d.grees (I/ mlnute6 05 s.conds Wgsl, 50.00 l6€t;
Thence Soulh 7, degre€ 48 nlnd.r 41 seconds We31 160.18leel:
Then6 south l0 de0re6 53 dnutEr 33 seconds W6t. 36.48 leel:
Thenca Nodh 87 degrees 40 mlnul6 0€ seconds Wg!t, 337,72leol;
Thencs (Nonh I I d.e |9es 52 mhues 13 seconds EG! '130.00 te€l M) Nonh t I d€greot 55 mlnulss 3l soconds Er$, 129.75 lea Meesured) lo lho
POINT OF BEGINNING.
gearlng trom c.L.O. recod lor South h8fi ol Sedlon llns between Sedlons l+ts, (G.L.O, .ecod South 01 d€gre$ 30.2 nlnute3 Erst) (Sotlh 01 dogroes 38
mhul6 32 s€condE E.st Me.sured)
Applicant:Juanita l. Pedotto
t t
11. A request for a minor exterior alteration and a slte coverage variance to allow for an
enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner ol the Gore Creek Plaza
Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st
Filing.
Applicant Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom
ArmstrongPlanners: Randy Stouder/Shelly Mello
'12. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road East/an unplatted parcel located between Vail Village 7th Filing
and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
fii:::l" Ii:,'li::y:1'""''"ll3i.:; ;;i::::::i:::,.
13. A request for preliminary plat approval of a major subdivision (Trappers Run) on Lots
16, 19 and 21 , Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally located north
of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge Subdivision.
Applicant: John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway Development
Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED TO TtlE MARCH 14,1994 .
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION MEETING
*tnn Review Action tn ltf 3r P /,"t- *
TOWN OF VAIL
category ruumber--l
Project Name: 7
Buifding Name: -Z'rz- ".r-t].'--t . 't t 4 - ,t /a.
Proiect Description:
o"". Ya7/?4 --
r"tr
Owner. Address and Phone:
-7,,.-..--,--A- , .2 1-o,r.,, o ..A*.",-r-t.
nrcnitecVdnifu Add ress and Phone :
Legal Description: Lot _ Block_Zone District
Project Street Address :
Comments:
Boar
Motion by:
Seconded by:
! Approval
a Disapproval
XlitattRpprovat
Conditions:
Town Planner
ort", E/Z/q4 DRB Fee ere-caia 30 .Q f /.
q.
!ac{Ut{u,Hq
FH
H
tdE
t!o
U
tt]tt
'ttE{Hott
''3Hoz
B-
ord
:.PH
F
oo
E{o
oo
t-t
l,Fl*r{lo;tdg!uE;EH
*w-I=f;-tdot{ tdrl rrH<ZtiOU
e
H
rtlg1oFHH
FlH
z
HP
IUIF
l8fidlo
lHIHt4lrdloIF
tvlFlIH
l9
*,tIt
,t******
tr
Ia
\
g
\=
tE
F ll FlU ll F<UII UFll rdrd >z(a oo otn o€ rd
riO FF.O trtOFFO H\F ^[ g
$ trcn 39\)" . P.ooop
a\i3:ofr;
'\OS'
\- | |NtltloK
- oF--t\Fp)N-O O\yD t-lErt )ygl-!r(fHO
r-l
FO,orf<P.P.Oo5€
^a.tt Noo
oo
t-1td
(nE{tr trltroolt
P- Ei
P-Uur t{
ts. taor)DFHrd
Fl
H
z
N rfoJHo ooFnzoH cf OlJz 5F1 FtO l-,. |-,.O.. vltrurfo
OJ P. FIlSOrttlj p<
l.rts. P-OlJ (a
P' f-cropP.p oOoulloo.F|id F"nttoo<o
H.ottoK
o0,5
9roohfro(/|
15p, F,FtF
F, O.,
fTo('oArF5Jo9OUI
CT H9rO9laO0tHql
rTrrg,
oF
trroct
uttsoo
7r
Frl
z
=trl
EI
€zt{7
a
Epr
H.P
ts.
rA
t,
o.,o,
r-.t
o(n
(,l
H
F.H|<PrrrU O It/) o gJ lJ P- td o t.UoF\J3Ut I to tr P(D o t{9r g, pr< trl o HP-ortts.otrl 3 nOO r,.F t.t, t{ p. !. oo'a .. p HFtF m P. FiO FNtr U tr OF.OOrrrd 3 2P HrF 3 @ UjQP.]'rrF, fr h 15 -crll rr(D ff, Ho o tt cr o r-1 ErF Prn O Erc" lf P'|'FIPO q' ZO O Q.Frig, ts Olf,F. ul Hr"O 5 r" P-q, lnrq 5Ul h btt E' o ir tdPtst' O qro. ou{ lJ }l'NF5 lc
'dtt 3td ts OO tslP. 9r P. dFI'dOtt O t{OO- 15O 0l tD{ U< tt tD. d\5 PO P t{eHt,.- o tjrt€OOo5grg,p, :EUl rr r-.1 Ho o o P-o FtP i+' O tCo P.D cr Otr<o. o q!
HOJO No P.!t ttFct O Od P- E< -!r{ Fh oj u EO F.K ft 9, !dH Ots- htO H cr l-1 or \o itr ttF{OrO q)Xcl, {ct lao Lr. F, F HOtrOOr" Oc"rlop5 ZNF O l'FNH}I
O crg, dO !'ct tdoo D[
r-.1
rd
>EU
t1Ho
PzFl
;
!
F1
oao
lttt
Itd
Fd
I
lLa
l9
IE
IUtc{r{r{rt}€}r} lt-rur P lt{o(nuFr 1..ooooo
o oooor.l oooo PPrlPPOtrc.P€.e> €l tt ta €l €' HFts OzOO(JIPooouruFroooooc)
H}Usrttrl\t utU2F H
F9sFY€Ftdtd t{uq<'zHt{ ldH€u,qrtr,
trgFtrUcH"t{ rdE rttH
'rtzoo<PIU E{dFt{EXHro€HFHt{vrr/2
E2ur ldqtrl<utdD>FzU}
EIoHl
9frv,€ rrlNH
8F|t t1H
2
oooooc)ooooo()ooooo<)
aaaa&t>UIANtsoooo('!.)Elooooo<)td
'.....trjooooo<)oooooc)
$,\
i,J
:so
H
FHar{z€FtsH
td
I -f;.fl s Edq r",!.8;; Er*
H;'fr; or s'$lll e; En*; elF H* liEntl:si*r$i ** ;; b*gs I;HE Hl :,?d.ir IH Bil= tEs !i EirPfif; gd!gfi:'# Ef '4:;C3iaE El e;;E.::t ai i;Es. iE; ri irrrii i+;il.Et it os 6;e
#rs#Er et EHrsnit E{ i;;*l i;E tg ;l*;:l 3fi5i;:: i; l* IaE
*E-!ri .r 'iaprd,E, ".6 i:{g; Ers i{ Etgii! "i'-Bitl. aE Eig EE;ii:li: El fliEHit sla stiEs H;.: lc l;i:€$ rilf;Et.Hf; dr lflE rHe
tariEE gl iE.ggi:i Etd t;;;q itiE ii isr;3s tds".tEs ' 35 !ir:iisr;Hte El rs.iB;Hr el; ;;iE; $i:* i* ,i;glni :li;:ifi; i li ;ij! 6 ,"
;:Ha3*s 3 E3llsii Ejn *iil; iilr; ;u ;:iHt; i::fiH;:a i :; esB *fr.
iiigiaB Jt s!Esie,,,!: ii€ii ai"i Er -1j;lt grt;g$;i 5:t Eg; !,;!qe:rHFi El !tjiBEi nFE i{!sE :dEE E; isar.n BrEco,BB. * ;i:oEdid,E5 ar 3s,E"r.{ $i6 dt"Er EiiE' $tT €3.83r. *?..953:3.r.9"'E 5.11 f;i9g;iE!3i $| SlirE;* HHi o'.xra 'iErq "'. .:;r;8 :j.:s3Fr d ESL rIe rir
;gElii: sl !iHinr' ;r; I*{::e 3E;5 ;;E ri;er; rt;:r;xs e a:r sBs BEi
0Er.i.i$ Et .iEsiBsi E[E Es:Ett iEH.r ;:i i]5'$:i flE;EEEsE : ggl ili HEE.
AgiieiH ;l f;i$H;;; ssE e""333 sees B'n Ed6'6"' :lEiEi;8 1""u'"u EEgE
iltBEca Et Ea.:sd6,s nEE EEfte$A #fi8! ' , JHlEBeli I ' ' Hc*s
Hqiao.n-d ol
roooi!, Et .4o'nr.'oar' Hl { a o o st r! o
T
(92H
F
tqt{E
=z
-
VEj 4ctHAftftf
HH
Ol
;
H
zItE
trl
rd
Efr
q
trlo
r-J
(,)E{€rdNAt{ },trl trlFl
FtrIU(aUc)FFHH(nU(,Id..H oz
'dF]oy<o
P.O t+,doHtUtsoop{
F,I P.OFatt
O FJ.H|pOHtFtoo t-l
0.r pr
rtHlP-P.OFF
9.)HP.
U)
P
UU€€ratrtOurnEooP.P-oprcrP.OcoolJ!JH'I,up,oHnnOP.ttOOP't+rFoooP'ts.npuFl{{d9rlqFf-1 hhdzE' Fl 0, Ci3BH.P.PE 3F EH!, !d(+FOHr-t DP. E{gr ulHo
t:rottlfrOFlOrdtrl!EPcrX O l-1 t-t 5 tsF!,ZJftc?OFrF.g,CpUOOgrOtn=('lOO@HFtlJ.55J|irnoP.p5(DP.oIvol,.ot{Et'tFg lJo'QHquloouztrroP.oOP.=u:OO..clprvr'd irPrrHFipF.u)op,ZPhP'O,QP3ao
o
Fh
g,15n€tto}(Ft'qtodE<P.9rHotsortl oot !, Fr,v50t3 Ft!{ ttnOvlHdy qttF 1..8<ts-Or"Pcr.. 0,H
ut
s
T
trl
l"E{Hu,€
orrt
BP€
!nFH
Fu,
trt
E{
c)x
(Dafd l-'irtao55(Don
v)
utUH
Ha
Hoz
rto
(+
ito
oo
P.qp
Ur Er ta \og tr --l
.Fl .-l OE c J4'-lE..t O..t(dcth
Srrn!OO!t{l'{OO- uro r+{ OoorrHU do{trr0oOrJHO
t+a .q t+a .qbr L). ._t oo o.q Fi,-r.crJo
F{d0rco3 rr .-t H('4 (l,tDurr4c ..{ ..{ 3..rd 3 (l)cc o.dH.aF{d -{o!, .Fl0,>tdtalr${ 3r{v -.'{ ?-{u ra.{ (U(')ooS
Fl gr
E Ul !ta{D toF{ O U'',{ ra .-l !tf'l al OEr& ar.q Ut
F{ .FlfrlAEO
dEu^.-t E(/l.x5oodgz D z-.1do xF1 .d..E&oottl r-l r{E o'r .
EiOd.O O3c.
r+{ r+{oootro dolJfu F{ A0)o o>oF{ ]..} .qA.O b orrtr -- tll'-l 0l D
'CtH.rrdtO nt.C d Uo P{ bt tlO O..l U' dplo-.1o oEkd0,>cO. ,qOttlC JJ .Quo d(I,.rt E 0,uo!Hbc hd (d^
H O '+t b F)
.Fl ..l .Fl t/lrrr|0rO5ot.ot{.qotnUlU 5 trO..{ O +r 0, ..{ .
-l--l Xt E<,..{tJ5|.n
l{dq{ r{ .oc 0, @'.{ nl.4d .rrk u.-t !otnlg>5tr! o o o o.o.X l.t lr rr ..1o t >o5!lJ q{ O U+1 x..{ d q)H..r!trtruiq q (I' o-..oEO,+{d 3 tZ oH O.{ q,
Hr{t{
Er l.t O .J
E O . .Q '1, ir(J.a c o xH E d 0, ul .-l
Fl ,.-{ O O '+{C Qrrl PrEl AOltA O U'o |{.q.{.q € 9{ btU !.r{ O .-lA rJ.q rJ F{n 3.c .rr.qz o b' b'od.q.-t c..{.qFf u) -{ .-l -.1 .D
F{o d
t{ \JodiE E-{HZEto>U
&z
HFt(n
){GFF]
z
H
E{d(J
l-t
.l
rV
O FIHOFlAO frl > Fl(/) r/) ErO
v)&
F1
U
2Do&o
UIoo
t{]J
v))o
tr
o,
r+{
.r{
cou
ko
r+{
!,Ebl._l
(ut
o
+)
GIo.FlrtcH
c.cl
UI
5l
il
t{l
HI
El
EI'El
'gl
;oot{p
oao)(t
.'..1
uo€
Ho
r+{
t{oa
'.1
'-l(t
U
q)
rJoo."1
'dFiH.r
,El
#l
oA)t{Eo
oq,
ltt
o
0.oolr{ glg{X
E-llq{
o
q)
N._l
o
fl;tool.Fl
'-l I6 -llFi (dl
i;l
coFlrut4FlHF]frftE] E-{ [DFm40DxEl&
ErO.nzadooFl&Z&&d
TOWNOFVAIL
CHECKS MADE PAY
0t(ffi42412
VTC ART PROJECT DONATION
PAID DESIGNREVIEW BO
* 01 fino21112
0l4000 4237r
ALTERATION
MINOR AMEND
-I-EL'H GF (JFI I1_
14isceI I aneotrg Cash
fi7-.i'r-':r4 1E:3€': ff9
F.E,,-{'L F, i +' :. 5f,:;::-i
il;,--'-,r-rrir. * i..:il. ++ i:ii
i i..i i..j it::F,r .ri.: :::. 1."'r:ti.ltrr.l::;...F F.:F"PH l ll tiF.:El
ii;1s|",r 11t. ?,"i r,jH i-P,::i .:' :E1.ElF
I terrr paid RtocJnt Paid
i'r]. fr--rtr:l'i.i.;f,i.!ltll:r ';8. f-tl:l
t...l-r.jt:11-r,:l,t,i, y ;,,, i.rr r-n*,J .', !:1.1:lEl
-rHl=lhlli \fBIJ
Lr'';rr-rp [.ls:hjer HEIfTI
coPrFfL t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
September 8, 1994
Mr. Steve Riden
P.O. Box 3238
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Steve:
Department of Community Development
Thank you lor attending the Design Review Board (DRB) meeting held on Wednesday,
September 7, 1994. The purpose of this letter is to summarize the conditions of approval for
the proposed Sadler residence located at 1970 Chamonix Lane. Each of the conditions of
approval stated below needs to be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit from the
Town of Vail. The conditions of approval are as follows:
1. That a cross access agreement be executed and recorded with the Eagle
County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
2. That a landscape easement be executed and recorded with the Eagle County
Clerk and Recorder's Oftice for the proposed landscaping on Lot 34,
resubdivision of Buffehr Creek.
3. That the revised driveway plan be submitted and approved by the Town of Vail
Fire Department.
4. That a revised landscape materials list be completed and submitted to the
Office of Community Development. The revised landscape materials list should
include allplant material indicated on the landscape plan reviewed by the DRB
on SeptemberT,1994.
5. That a second story be added to the connection feature between the primary
and secondary unit.
6. That the site plan for Lot 34, resubdivision of Buffehr Creek conform with the
plans conditionally approved by the DRB on September 7, 1994.
Again, thank you for appearing at the DRB meeting with the proposed Sadler residence. Each
of the six conditions of approval placed on the proposed Sadler residence by the DRB needs
to be completed prior to issuance of building permit. Should you have any questions or
concerns with regards to the information addressed within this letter, as always, please feel
free to contact me during regular office hours.
Sincerely,
fJ*T-'Q'-ur-r
George Ruther
Town Planner
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
May 20, 1996
Arequestforanamendmenttotheprevious|yapprovedsitedeve|opmentp|anfor
in" r,i"iOiu"r Meadows Suuo]viiiori, located- at 27 7 2-2892 Kinnickinnick
Road/lnnsbruck Meadows.
Applicant:lnnsbruck Meadows Development, represented by Bob Borne
George Ruther
Wf Cend#icnTO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planner:
I. BACKGROUND
o on April 1 1, 1994, the Town of vail Plannino and Environmental commission (PEC)
reviewed
"no
,""omi"nA"O
"ppiou"l
(4-0-i), to the,Vail Town Cou,ncil, a request lor a
minor subdivision and a request ro rezone a iract of land from P1q1qv/s9c-ol-9ary. .
Residentiato r-o*tEniityl*rrumpre-ramify generally located at27l? - 2892 Kinnictinnick
Road. Includ"o *min ln.i recorimenOati6iof approval from the PEC were numerous
conditions. Condition #1 (e) requires that:
.GRFA,sitecoverageandheightsha||beallocatedforStrucfuresasfo||ows:"
Euilding
Enrelog. t Durelllr|g Untts Credh GRFA
Totd GnFA
AloFd slb covcrt(|e H.bhr
I 2 450 so. fl.2,080 sq. ft-2.530 sa. fi.'| .800 sq. tl.3:t tt.
2 1 225 so. fi.| .425 sa. ft.| .650 so. tl.I ,400 3q.ll.$fr.
3 '|25s.lt,1 .,125 sq. fr-1.450 sq. tt.1 .400 sa. lt.33 ft.
4 225 sq. ft.1 .425 sq. ft.I,650 sq. fr.'1./O0 80. ft.3itft.
5 2 450 so. fi.1 .680 sq. h.2.130 !q. ft.L683 s. fl.3g fr.
D 225 sq. fi.1 .,t25 sq. fi.'l,650 sl' ft.t..t{X, sq. ft.gt n.
225 sq. n.I .425 80. fi.1,650 9S.ft.1.400 so. ft.3it tt.
I 2 ,150 so. ft.1 .680 sq. fi.2.130 so. ft.1.683 sq. ft.sltr.
9 I 225 sq. ft.1 .425 sq. tl.1 ,650 8q. lt.I .400 sq. ft.3t!n.
t0 ,|e.n.1,,125 sq. n-1.650 sq, ft.'1,100 sq. fl.3il ft.
,t50 sq. lt.I .680 to. fi.2,130 sq. ft.I,683 sq. n.glft.
12 ?,S9,,-n.1,,f25 sq. !-1.650 sq. ft.1.400 $. ft.3Kl ft.
13 225 sq. fl.I .,125 so. ft.1.69, so. lt.'1.&0 3c. tl.3lft.
l4 2 ,t50 sq. lt.| ,680 sq. fi.2.130 sq. ft.1 .68:l !q. ft.3it fr.
F:EVERYONBPECWEMO$INNSAft rcKs2O
1r.,.'r.Ii :
Additijqally, Cond1ion # 6 of the PEC recommendations requires that:
1..
"Staff may approve up to 10'shifts in building footprint location from those shown
on the pldn iiproved by the Planning and Environmental Commisgon on
February 28,'i994, or April 1 1 , 1 994, as long as the 15' separation between the
units is maintained.'
On May 17, 1994, the Vail Town Council approved on second readfg, Ordinance No' 5'
Series bf 1994, an ordinance rezoning a triit ol land from Primary/Secondary_Residential
to Low Oensityitvtu1ipte-Family, geneially located ar2772-2892 Kinnickinnick Road. The
approvat ot OiOinanie No. 5, Seiies of 1994, included each of the conditions
recommended by the PEC at their hearing on the request.
on May 1, 1995, Bob Borne, President of snowshoe Development, lnc" plrchased the
develoiment rights to tots Z - 13, in the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision from the original
Oevefober, Cre! Rmsden of AmBros. Development Corp. Deve-lopment rightsto Lots 1 &
t4 were retaine? by Ms. Juanita Pedotto, the original owner of the Innsbruck Meadows
property.
On June 2, 1995, the Town of Vail Building Department issued the first Building Permit for
construction in the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision. Since that time, five additional
Building Permits have been issued and construction of the units has commenced. To
date, fi;e Temporary Certificates ol Occupancy have been issued for units in the
Innsbruck lUedOows Subdivision. Temporary Certificates ol Occupancy have been issued
for Units 4, 5A, 58, 6 and 7. Temporary Certiticates of Occupancy are pending for Units
jA, 1B and 3, none of which are employee units. Each of these units is currently under
construction and nearing completion.
II. DESCRIPTION OFTHE REOUESTS
Bob Borne, the applicant and developer of the lnnsbruck Meadows Subdivision, is proposing to
amend the previdJsly approved site development plan for the east-half of the Innsbruck
Meadows Subdivisioh.
'The proposed amendment includes, the relocation of the building
footprints for Lots 8 - 1 3 by rhorb han 10 feet from their approved locations, the relocation of two
of ttie required Employee ltousing Units, and the realignment and change in surface material of
the requiied S'peO'estiiannicycle path along Kinnickinnick Road. According to the applicant, the
propoded amendment to the iite plan is necessitated by the need to provide access into the
bmitoyee housing unit garages ahd provide greater opportunities for landscaping along
Kinnickinnic* Road (see attachment #1).
The applicant is proposing to amend the previously approved site development plan according to
the summary below:
F:\EVEFYONEIPECU,EMOS\INNSBRUCK.s2O
Summary of the Proposed Amendment
General- nOlust driveway curb cut locations to accommodate the proposed building fooFdnts'
Lot 8o change from one single-family with an EHU to one single-family unit.
o Relocate building footprint 14 feet to the west'
Lot I- Ctrange from one single-family to one.single-family with an EHU'
o Relocate building fooprint 21 feet to the west.
o Provide a one-car garage for the EHU.
Lot 10o Relocate building fooFrint 8 feet to the west.
Lot 11o Change lrom one single-family with an EHU to one single-family'
r Relocate building tootprint 28 feet to the south
Lot 12o Relocate building footprint 25 feet to the west.
Lot 13r Change from one single{amily to one single-family with an EHU'
r Relocate building footprint 21 feet to the west.
o Provide a one-car garage for the EHU.
Lot 14e No change
A copy of the proposed site plan, comqaring the oliginal approval.to the,proposed.amendment
site fi6s Ueen'anicned for reference. The original location of each building fooprint is shown as
a dashed line and the proposed location of each building footprint is shown as a solid line.
The applicant has also proposed to realign the 6' wide pedestrian/bicycle path and change th-e
surtaid material to asphalt, instead of concrete as originally proposed. Thq Rath was originally
pioposeO to meander along the southerly si-de of the 20', platted, utility, drainage and pedestrian
ba#ment located adjacenlto Kinnickinnick Road. The applicant is proposing to relocate the
pitr approrlmately 5r to 1S' to the north of the previously approved location. The expressed--purpoiifor retocating the pedestrian/bicycle pitfr is to frovide qleater separation between the
iesidentiat units and lne Oibycte path. Addifionally, the greater distance betureen the patt and the
risidential units allows for moreiandscaping and berming to be placed between the road and the
ieiiOinies, mui, providing additional bulftering. The request to change the surface material t0
Jspnaft, rafher thdn concr6rc, is intended to reduce long-1stt maintenance costs and reduce the
iisl oi dracfing. Additionally, the appticant believes that asphalt will b9. more pleasing from an
iestneticuiew-point, since the patfr witt connect with each driveway. The driveways have been
approved to be asphalt. The pioposed location of the path is illustrated on attachment ff2-
F:EVEBYONAPEC\MEMO$INNS8RUCK.52O
Since the applicant is proposing to amend the location of two of the employee housing units on
tne east-nait'of the prdrpeity, C6ndition # 1(e) of the orlgllal ap.proval must be a revised. The
ina"g"i fiposeo by ihe iipticant witt noietfect the GhFA, site coverage, credits, or height
iiior"inces. 'tt simpty retociies the buildings and density. The table below illustrates the
proposed amendment.
'Changes are shown in:iffii#il text
Bulldlr|9
EnvaloD. ,Dmlllng Unlt3 Credlt GRFA
TOT'I GRFA
Allosd Sh. Cover.gc Helgl
1 2 ,|"90 so. lt.2,080 sq. tr.2.530 {. ft..|.800 so. fi.glfr.
2 I %s.tt.1.425 ao. ft.I .650 r. tt.'r,4O0 s. tt.<r.
3 I *. tt.1.,125 sq. ft.I .650 ro. tt.t.a00 sq. li.gltr.
1 I s.h.l.,l25s.tt.I .650 r. ft.l./O0 so. ft.3!ln.
5 2 450 !q. n.1.680 !o. tt.2.lgl s. ft.1.683 so. ft.glfr.
6 1 225 so. fi.t .,125 30. n.1.6q, s. ft.1.400 so. fr.33 1r.
7 I s.lt 1.,125 s. ft.| .630 {. tt.l.,lOO eq. ft.$n.
I :T q2t ii.e .iial$rrii'tli rrP#liltr i:Iduiii*;t gt:ft
I .fl 450j,rqi:lf::f:tSorld:j{l:2;tl0:li*.t;tJtr:r&]fi 3e,fr
r0 1 e-h.1.425 r. n.'| -650 !d- ft.1.400 so. fl.3B ft.
t:i !t *.*:ht t /igt di;ilt ir;i660.ii$il r;1€0iaiil:ft a0fr
12 q.ll.I .425 sq. n.1.65(, 80. ft.l.rO0 so. ft.33 ft.
i3 n l6D:tr,lL lrill0rtiiiE 4lgcisl:ft l:&l:iqrft SSitu
1,1 2 ,150 !q. ft.| .68{, 30. tt.2.190 so. lr.t.6&l so. tr.3:t fr.
III. STAFFANALYSIS
RELOCATION OF BUILDING FOOTPRINTS
As indicated previously, the applicant is proposing to amend the location and orientation
of each ol th6 building-s on the'east-half of the Innsbruck Meadows SuMivision, wih the
exception of Building?14. Building #14 will remain in its approve_d location. The purpose
for ttie change in building locations is to facilitate garage access for each of the employee
housing unita, and provide better views out of each of the structures. As originally .
propos-ed, and appioved by ttre PEC on April 1 1 , 19%, the required employee housing.
irniis did not have separati enclosed garage spaces. When the cuirent developgr, BPb
Borne, purchased thd rights to the project from Amsbros. Development Corporation, he
added ieparate enclosed garage spaces for the employee housing units to make them a
better redl estate product.-lt is staff's opinion that the proposed site plan relocating the
building footprintsfor Buildings 8-13 will not have any negative impacts on the adjacent
propefi owners. Statf would suggest however, that the PEC consider requiring _ _.
bOditoiat landscaping (evergreen trees) in the 20' setback area souft of Unit #13. The
type of structure oh t-ot te has changed slightly, and in.the staffs opinion, the new design
wirrants additional landscaping. Staff would suggest that two to hree, 8'tall
evergreens be required in this location.
F:\EVERYONAPEC\II|EMoS\|NNSBFuCK.520
while not a significant concern, statf would further.suggest that the. PEc _and
the
aoolicant disc-uss the proposed orientation of Building #1 1. As originally approved,
B[ftffi #] ifis not io be constructed parallelwith ihe south property line of the
ffig;;;d t\,ifiil S,lbdivtiion. Rs proiosed by the applicant, it will be.constructed
oaraitef to the south property line. Siaff'would suggestthat the building b€ rotated
[i""i"itfo"i*se oti itt southwest corner, to open up the area betwe-en Buildings #1 1'
;it, ljil"d t'tre existing Cametot Townhomed to thb south. lt is staff's opinion that this
ieoiientation woutd redudJthe canyon-like etfect created by Building #11 and the existing
Camelot Townhomes, as well as improve the drainage possibilities between Buildings
#12 and #11.
Lastly, staff would like to point out that the pro.posed deck encroachments into the 20'
,tifity,'Ciain"ge, and ped6strian easements will require encroachment.agreements
Gtui6en the
-Devetoder, ttre iotrn ot Vail and the Utitily companies. .
Historically, each of
.
tne affL"teO parties havegranted encroachments intoinis easement. The encroachment
igi;*en1s witt Oe requirlO prior to issuance of .Building Perrnits for.any of the proposed
B"rildi"S" ; the east-half of ihe Innsbruck Meadows SuMivision. The only exception to
this requirement would be Building #14.
REALIGNMENT OF THE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PATH
Statf has reviewed the proposed relocation of the required 6'wide,.pedestrian/bicycle
;;ih. gil review of me iroposed relocation, it is staff's opinion that the new location
friii not negatively impact iOjicent property owners. In statf's opinion,.the new location
*itt improvi ttre 6verhltdeveiopment as additional landscaping and buffering
opportlnities will be increased. Furthermore, staff feels that the proposed.change in
sirltace material from the originally approved concrete to asphalt is a positive change' In
discussions with the Town E-nginder, the use of asphalt as the surface.material for the
path will be less costly in terms of maintenance and less prone to cracking.
According to the original approval of the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision, the Developer
is require-O to providi tour,'deed-restricted employee housing units on the Innsbruck
rrl1eido*r proierty. The four employee units originally.were to be located in Buildings #5'
*e, tf f ariO *t+.'The applicant is proposing to amend the previously approved site
Oeietopr"nt plan, in pah, to amend tlie location of two of the four required emplo199..
nouiinb units. Tne afplicant is proposing to move the required employee unit in Building
#8 to Biilding *9 and the required unit in Building #11 to Building *13.
Upon review ol the proposed change to the location of the employee units, statf can lind
n6 reason to nqt sUbpdrt tre applicants request. Stafl would like to suggest, however,
tnlt ine appticaht is 6ounO by,'and obligated to, an employee housing unit phasing plan
ioi ine proie"t.. In order to c5mply withihe.required phasing.plg 9f 1lt9 employee housing
units, the ipplibant must construct an employee hou_sing unit this building..season.
ineiefore, birouH the Planning and Envirbnrirental Commission approve the applicant's
reqr"si to imenO the approve-d location ol the employee. housing^units, staff would
su6gest tn"t a conditiori be phced on the approval that the next Building Permit issued
foifie tnnsbruck Meadows'Subdivision Oe idr a building that includes an employee.unit
(i.e. Builoing #g). statf further finds the request to be reasonable since the over4l intent
6f tne iequiiem6nt ot providing four employ-ee housing units.within the_ lnnsbruck
Meadowd.Sutrdivisiori will coniinue to be met, regardleis of the location of the employee
units within the project.
FIEVEFYONAPECU'EMOSUNNSBRUCK.52O
tv.
5-o-\ o
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the applicant's request for an-amendment to the
prevlousty approved'site developmenf plan for the lnnsbruck Meadows Subdivision'
iocared itziiz-zagz Kinnict<iniicx noboluots 8-13, Innsbruck Meadow-s Subdivision.
Staff believes the request is both reasonable and appropriate as.described in the Statf
nirifyiL, ourtined in bection lll of this memorandum. Additionally, pursuant to Section
f A.66.OAb, Hearing Notice, the Community Development Department has notified
adjacent property 6wners of the applicantt proposal. staff has not received any negative
input from the adjacent property owners.
Should the PEC choose to grant an approval of the request, staff would recommend hat
the aooroval carry with it frre following conditions:
A. " ror l,lO +o (btn<t- lT toe"t€ ?-*qqa- €D96.
1. The appiicant submit to the Town of Vail, an engine_ered drawing. indioating the
propobbO driveway configurations for Buildings 8-13. The plan shall include
barhge slab elevaiions corresponding to those indicated on the site plan, as well.
is pfiposeO grades for the driveway-. Driveway grades. shall be those_approved
Oy ine'peC on nprit g, 1996. The plan shall be reviewed by the Town Engineer.
2. The Town of Vail Fire Department sign off on the driveway plan.
3. Prior to the request for a ftaming inspection of Buildings #14, #12, #9 and #8' the
applicant will execute an encroachment agreement between the developer' the
Town of Vail and the utility companies for each building.
4. The applicant's next request for a Building Permit be for a structure contiaining an
employ'ee housing unit, to insure the compliance with the required employee
norising unit phasing plan. Additionally, it shallbe the applicant's responsibility to
proced with'due diligence towards completion ol that employee unit.
5.Condition No. 6 of the Planning and Environmental Commission's
recommendation of approvel allowing staff to apProve shifts in the building
footDrint location ot ub'td'tdDom those shown on the proposed site plan and
appioved by the Plannin!-and Environmental Commission on May 20' 1996' be
rdmoved. The site plan proposed by the applicant shall be the site plan
constructed for this project per the dimensions and elevations indicated on the
site plan.
As originally conditioned, all buildings within the Innsbruc'k Meadows Subdivision
shall maintiin a minimum 15' separation between structures, including all decks
kman tE
bz'
-Dl€+" l-*u- oJ +e.e'.'
oL'J.
lrvtrJ - -4.1o.1€ Lc,r ll f.Qeaar oziq;,-t r+r-
lite.to\ - tYlov€ tar fl, Lor lD .
iljf frl f+ - I\t-G>
f*-* *tt
.
Cnue. lerezr'
l-^Y
C:'|+|E').
@q/+\_
r.nov-vneuf,.
tAA(4 - t\affi
F:EVERYONE\PEC\MEMOSVNNSBRUCK.s2O
Z re- oi:
o
INNSBRUCK M DADOWS DEVELOPMENT, IN(,.
P.O. BOX 4205
vAlt,, coLoRADo 81657
303-476-5263
Town of Vail
Plnnning and Environmcntal Commission
Froutagc Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
C/O Gcorgc Ruthcr, Town Planner
March 23, 1996
Dear George,
By this letter I am formally makirrg application for an opportunity to go beforc the
Planning and f,nvironmental Commissic n on April 21, to ask approval for minor site plan
changes of the approved plan for Innsbr rck Meadows Subdivision.
'tl'e changes rellect movement of some of the units by nrorc tharr over tcn feet, and
switch of rome of the duplex locations w th single family locations. Plcase understend that
we arc not planning to add or subtract d welling units. We merely are changing locations
so as to accommodate driveway access to the EHU, to which we havc added garages.
As you know there werc no garages associated with an EtlU in thc original plan lnd
all of those EHU units do now have onc garage spacc each. Wc will not be adding any
GRFA' w ill have prop6r sitc coveragc and atl of thc roads and gar':rge slabs will work within
the proper guidelines.
Geotge' I hopc that this application lctter which is accompnnicrl by the rcquircd
$250.00 fee is sufficient. There seem$ to bc no specific application for tlris grgre of requcst
but I shall be more than glad to add anything that you need to it or fill out an application
that is nrore suitable if such an application exists.
I wish to take this opportunity to tank you for your consideration,
l,I 6 193$ i;
'nt ' r'^ !r'i"
iif''/, u[irtf Lr ' (,l
llY'
Innsbruck l[eadofvJ Dcvelopmcnt
l:
a
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
)
ao0
a!
!,!t
a
6e
IDE
o
F.t,
u
x
6.6'Eo
.€
o
8
oa
@
E.g
=l0lI.rt
8!t
'.t
\. \
\,
o
5_
.}t
E.I
3e
I
f,-
id€Fto
(De
r... --.\
\.t,t\G\*!
:,a\. i:
\''
\:,
..-- -r.-J
'TiiTTi
gTigTIiiT
t
Eg
i\'\'
\v
,Ll_\
\ ---
\,6
\ri
x
u)og
o
(Tn
g)
nnEbruek Me a,dows
PIanortorrl I tt to
FILE COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970479-2452
March22,1996
Bob Borne, President
Inasbruck Meadows Development, Inc.
P.O. Box 4205
Vail, Colorado 81658
Department of Community Development
RE: Proposed changes to the previously approved Site Development Plan
Dear Bob:
Thank you for your application for the proposed changes to the previously approved Site
Development Plan for the Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision. The Town staffhas completed a
preliminary review of the proposed changes to the prcviously approvcd Site Development Plau.
The purpose of this lettcr is to inform you of the issues and concerns which must be ad&essed by
yourself,, or Sally Brainerd. prior to frnal review ofthe proposed changes before the Planning and
Environmental Commission on Monday, May 13, 1996.
The following is a list of issues and concerns:
', ./\l/ In order to determine the exact location of each of the remaining buildings, please indicate
on the site plan the exact location of each building footprint, by providing ties to two
building comers from two property comers.(6D
In order to detemrine driveway grade, please indicate the garage slab clevation of each
garage. l4z.
In order to detennine compliance with the Planning and Environmental Conmission
condition requiring l5' ofseparation betweerg{tuctures, please show all separation
dimensions on the proposed site plan. @
\i-l
V
'{
Please indicate how access is gained to Iot la. @
To determine the adequacy ofsnow storage on the site, please indicate on the site plan
and landscape plan areasofproposed snow storage.
@
{grnouoruo
r ir'r.|
@
trg
n
tf
r{
t
htt r a
T6 verifu existing and proposcd grades on the site, please provide a signed and stamped
updated-Topogruptir Surueyofttre property. The survey should include spot elevations
aiong the .AS" ogqnt utt at ihe points wherc proposed drivcways acccss Kinnickinnick
Road. @9
Please show All landscaping proposed on the landscapc plan. As shown, only the plant
material spccifically required by the Planning and Environmental Commission is shown'
The proposed footprint for Lot | 3 has changed dramatically. If you arc proposing a
change io the strucrure on Lot l3, you will necd to submit floor plans and building
elcvations illustrating the new sffucture.
According to the Design Review Guidelincs chapter of the Municipal Codc, finish grades
cannot excccd 2: l. As shown, several areas ofthe proposcd site gfading plan show
grades greater than 2: | . Please make thc appropriatc changes wherc ncccssary.
The proposed grading plan contours appear to be off. Somc grades, it appears' are not
shown. Plcasc rerisit the proposed grading plan and2n4!e changcs wherc necessary.
e9
The turniug radius on the driveways do not comply with the 20'center line turning radius
requirement. Please make the changes where necessary.
The driveway alignment onto Lot l0 does not function properly. Please make the
appropriate changcs. 1,D
As rcquircd. please subrfffaddressed and stamped cnvelopes of all adjaccnt property
o$'ners, accompanicd by a list of the samc. Envelopcs must be received by 4116/96'
At the time of the writing of this letter, comments had not yet been rcceivcd from the Town of
Vail Fire Departnent. As soon as comments are received, they will be forwarded to you.
Should you have any questions or concerns with rcgard to the information addresscd in this letter,
as always, pleasc do not hesitate in giving me a call. I can be reachcd most easily at 479'2145.
Sincerely,
2-t-.-t,- A^-t-- 1-1<-
c.]-*.Ruthe/ \ o
Town Planner
GR/jr
cc: Sally Brainerd
INNSBRUCK MEADOWS DEVEI,OPMENT, INC.,.
P.O. BOX 420s
vArL, coLoRADO t1657
303-47G5263
Town of Vail
Plenning and Environmental Commission
Frcntage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
C/O George Ruther, Town Planner
I4AR 2 6 1996
lvit 'UUivlM, D[V, [)EPT
March 23. 1996
Dear George,
By this letter I am formally making application for an opportunity to go before the
Planning and Environmental Commission on April 21, to ask approval for minor site plan
changes of the approved plan for Innsbruck Meedows Subdivision.
The changes rellect movement of some of the units by more than over ten feet, and
switch of some of the duplex locations with single family locetions. Please understand that
we are not planning to add or subtract dwelling units. We merely are changing locetions
so as to accommodate driveway access to thc EHU, to which we have added garages.
As you know therr wene no garages associated with en EHU in the original plan and
all of these EHU units do now have one grrage space each. We will not be adding any
GRFA, will have proper site coverage and all of the roads and garage slabs will work within
the proper guidelines.
Gcorge, I hope thet this application letter which is accompanied by thrftquired
$250.00 fee is sufficient. There seems to be no specific application for this type of request
but I shall be morc then gled to edd anything thet you necd to it or fill out an applicetion
thet is more suitable if such an application exists.
I wish to take this opportunity to tank you for your consideration,
by: Robert Borne, Pres.
A
o
-tr.l
tt
=oF}
b,(?
(D
t'
'^J
Eo
E1
Fl
5
|'E
.8.(!o
(?
v1c,
'o
o
3C9
F 3.8<<F
" 6Ftl-* IE'E 5''E{ox{r
r-t,f
U)
(!o
o
o-o
5
3
I i-l
l(?t<t('la-I|l.t
t()
\$dr\Fr\\{ ct\-
RT$utll\U,N
pf,\, !.:rt\\
7"
U
u'
(t|
c
$
o'
+l\J
ad Nl\ $ rrr'f.tht t"
-NJIaI
-t
o
I
I
II
CD
o
o
o
o
(t
o
oo
A)
I
II
I
15
o
oA
{
oo
a
'o
5
(n
t\
I
a,EEv!
-t
Ctl.
-!l
.l. a,,
..'ri
q\
Frn
u
IFr
I
I(o
c
5
o
ls
|Iti
ilsil
sl
-It
J'oc-mc){
g
m
a,c
G'
lmo
oso>
=3
z.alde
z.@mE
ts3sf
3=
6)
TD4m11(f
m(t)
c)T-It{oz.
o-ir
{:f,m
'u
:oo.TJ
ogt
-
-(t
{f
f
{_
F\.
$,I
.J
d
F
IIt
I
s
t
t
--I-
F
1I
\,
\
hf'r-tI
J
Ec
EFtso
{ovt{att
EEI:g
FFl
EIzH
7o
(o
€(9o.cl:s
ls
l3
li
IR
lc
$
95s
R-E
F$:.RE3
o3,s-1
ER,.R
ot>+
oD
F*
id1.2tl
3€ta
gl 1*q-fgD
io-oA
^qt J5$Ll."a
=
R
E-g
t
c\
RK
$
e
J
o
Eo
o
1\
I
tc
(\
65
ts.1
5va
?
;
.ss-s
.ot(
(t
N
'.
It
!
t4E f iI 87{i^4a IdC Filfit'l 95
-t ,^l $E3io^
t
1t
'''
F
0!J
G'
o
.f
'.'l)
a
cr.
ti:
I
Fc
!(D
c
3
o
o
F
rt
on
tz
It
l+l(ftmllll>lf,l{l='lm
t=t>FllJlmt<,tmBIdri
La:7)
t\)
l\) {g3
c,if
1l
gt
J
=o
1tIoC.mc,{
o
{m
C"e
TD
Img
c,
mo-rl
'octrtrd
-r-m
Pz.o
(,o
==mz,-{a
z.mmqJ
lTl(f,
E
*
E1
m-11
omac)FT'{6z.o'Tl
{'r
m
T
:0o.It
oa
r
1
f
I
L
t
L
t
Fg
F
-wF
o
1
oFXa
ts
F'>g
FFl?tr-
trlzr'i
s gE. q dr ra 3aE'E t 6 x
$ + iE b$i5flr
N ': f i IF zi
I
I
tJcr
G'
aB
ffi
N,
;6f
E
L
3
-s3f
l
i
I
1
t
''F
:-B'-r!
Kq
*i{
=\3#)
_Jtrjml
!I
0ol.i
et
^.4-t!'r|i It. Ilr.rtpl
ll:lrt
"i\' fi:
'1 i+ t- f:i - --...-
;f$;.-;=sos_ -T
W':*1
[+l'-,i'l/
,ffi
$l-l
\rJ
A_T
:>tr
ls'
l,:'#
I LandseaPe &
\ \ site Plan'\-L.t \a l'- lo.o
.l
Itra Ltltrt -Af !
o
trJ(tdo.
(t7
r,J
(.ott
bJz
LL
6
fiJg(n
rI)olF6F(tl
u)
to
r.D(tl(tr
u)f\
s6
t\s
Lr-l(t
(I
tJt-
H(t
trjtl
biz
(L
-)
oo)g(n
N-t-(n
ut
t;
rI)(tl
0ll
ul(\'
v
It IFaT-taa'tlt |. L-]Ftt
;[2,,TTT"+
LOIVER LEVEL
1/4" - 1 'Q"
537 SQUARE FAET GRTA
I
7oo
a
o
o
7
h
oI
E
c
fr)r$
trj(F
rl_
HOt{
tt)l)l
uiz
oI
f4g
ulu)
c.lF.
F.
cn
(o
lo
u)ttl(n
u)(.'r '
vo,
MAIN LEVEL
1./,+" - 1 'O"
r1o9 SQUARE FEET GR!-A
\i i)
Ii
o
a
It
o
0,
L
o
D
H
c
.,
lrli5
fI
HO
iJtLI
"iz
ll
t.J
F(r}
ctt!
F-
f.l1
'l)(n(n
u)(\l
o-
3i
L
I-----r-----L
ll
--l
I{'rl ,+-----J
ROOF PLAN
1/4" - 1'O"
tf.ta
It(tdfI
HO
Hm
^u
uj
H
LL)d
o
fr)
(n
'!C.lr-srr(tl
rl)
ln
ro('|(n
|r}ct
\to.
?SUMtr
:TEa5 Darx r?,
,.. r.o"CatlD.v & rrrtl_va.
-+.I8+il[r-
FRONT ELEVATION
1.t+.. - 1'O,'
3i
L
'.crE
Ll|(5
o
4l
(tt
-IJ\blo
r,i
rl_)
s,
fr-'g
f'ro^f!/I
F-lr'
lft
toui(n
ult\,
gs.
^ t-o&Ne!. +1$tr-
RIGHT ELEVATION
li
h
(.*r--)
E
o
I tl-rlttrtl
tr-
Gftr L|.l rt".
ttrD
r. ?.orLllD.-----v--E-ilrrrsF-
'g(r}fC'
!'l:--
F.f'
tD
;;
d)(tl
cl
I6
REAR ELEVATION
,t-t-r Id
ii
h
1/+" - 1.O''
!oE
LI(5d
TL
az{4
a
LIJ
bJ?
fLJ
\-r.-,,r tnrr
ld arSlit Daat tt'
E.ITItta;
r l.OrLllD
---v-E-fi6'FF
^ ?.oFltD.
--.:uft--
(r)rt
TI
F.(n
'It
rii
m('l
toN.
6).
LEFT ELEVAT I ON
(*--)
ll
hp
!Ig
1./1" - 1 ',O"
|I
trJ(t
o
?a-3.ttr
HO
blo
'l;7
IL
-J
| ,^ !a-I
| - r. + .w. (itv
i
I
I
.i
,:I
'l
I
lre.'llt! i ,\l. ;i-t-rF t rP
i
ii
h
SECTION A
a,'
t',iIJo
HO
triII'
UJ7
n
(rrit
po
fi
'-O(Jl
u-)f,l
9
SECTION B
ra.dL.rtt
a 1|.o.llY L ntlt
___ l4-i.t!. |6 ;I . t-rt v
D
)
0{
a
o
2
Ir0r)t
hg
I
d
c
1/4" - 't 'O"