HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIONS RIDGE FILING 1 BLOCK C LOT 5-6 SAVOY VILLAS PART 2 LEGALCHEN.NORTHERN, INC.
CO}ISULTIIIG ENGIBEERS AND SCI EI.ITI STS
REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
T0: l4r. falid Said J08 l{0. 4 445 93-1 DATE: 10-26-93
1100 ]{orth Frontage RoadVail, C0 81657
DAILY REPORT NO. 5 SHEET 1 OF 2
PR0JECT: Savoy Vi11as, Vail, Colorado.
IIEATHER CONDITI(ITIS AIID TEiIPERATURE :
COIITRACTOR'S COI{STRUCTIOII ACTIVITIES :
PERS0lll{EL: Arrow Excavati on
IiIAJOR EQUIPIIIENT:
ACTI VITI ES:
CHEi'I-I{ORTHERII'S SITE ACTIVITIES
' ye perfomed nuclear density tests. All tests passed.
Clay in the bottorn lift was removed, replaced and neconpacted,
Three trips were nade to the site today.F";\tr t'lo't 1$lt3 H
tu*W
VERBAL C0l1l,lUt{ICATI0I{ IIITH CoI{IRACT0R, EI{CIllEtR, ARCHITECT, oUi{ER
COP ItS: Eeck and Associates;
I
I sandi n. cody
I FIELD oBSERVER
Fred R. Carneron
APPROVED BY
Aa I Duturl prot.ctfqn to c'll.nt3, th. Fubllc and ouFl.lv.., all r'.pot"tr r|.. rt|borlttad ai th. confld.ntl.l property of our cll.ntr, rndruthor{2.tlon for publlcrtlor of rtrtinant. Conclu3lon3 or.rtr4ct! froit or r.g.rdlng our raport3 l3 r..!.r.vad pandlng our nr{tt.n approvrl.
Semplca lilll b. dlrpo!.d of aft.r t.3tlng 13 conplrt.d uolara othaF .n anganant a ara .gr..d to ln wp{tlng.
A nrmb.r ot th. !I! group of comprnl.a
;r- I
CHEN-NORTHEFN, INC.
coflsuLTt[G ENGI EenS AIO SCIENTISTS
REPORT OF FIELD NUCLEAR DENSITY TESTING
Ar r ||rstull pr,otactton to c1l.nta, th. publtc.rd our-r.lv.r, .ll r.pottt .r. 3ubtrltt.d rr th. cohtld.ntlll pFoF.rty ot ou'. cll.ntt.
,;d !'rthort2;tlon tot oubllcltlon of 3tltrm.nt, conclurlo'|t or txtrrett trotD or i.grrdlng our r.Fort3- It i.t.r'v.d- paddlnt our {rltt'n
;;;r;;;i:"3iiiii.'iit f-ui aiiioicc or r?t.r ta.tlng Ir co.rpl.t.d u'|l.t. oth.r .titns. .nt3 !r^..9r4.d to In wF{tlnE.
A;drb.r ot th. !I! grogP ot comPanl.a
T0: ilr. Ualld Sald JOB t{0. 4 445 93-1 DATE: 10-26-93
ll00 ltlcrth Frontage Road
Vai l, C0 81657
OAILY REPORT tIO. 5 SHEET 2 OF 2
PROJECT: Savoy Vl llas, Vail, Colorado.
SPECIFICATIOI{ COI{PACTIOII & IIAIERIAL
lllt{IMul,l REQUIREO II{-PLACE DEI{SITY: 95I AS OETERt{lilED BY: AsTl't D-698
Cot{STRUCTioil C0I{TIACT0R: Arrow Excavation TEST L0CATI0]{S UERE SELECTED 8Y: Chen-t{orthern
TYPE AI{D NUI,IBER OF EARTH ]{OVII{G UI{ITS:
TYPE AND I{UI.I8ER OF COI4PACTIOI{ UIIITS:
METHOD OF AI)DII{G i{OISTURE;
THICK}IESS OF LIFT:
ilUI,IBER OF PASSES:
TEST
r{0.
locATI0tl
Phase i
DEPTH OR
ELEVATIOI{
( FEET)
LABORATORY I FIELD
PERCEI{T
(RELAIIVE/
IrtAXItitufi)
OBTAINED
SOIL TYPE
ilAXlilUl,t
DRY
DEt{SITY
(pcf)
()PTIMUH
I'IOISTURE
CONTEIIT
DRY
0EIslTY
(PCF)
HOISTURE
COI{TEITT
I
+
5
l,li d South Ual l
llid l{orth ljal I
Clay Ranrovad
and Repl aced
llid South Ual l
Mid t{orth Ual I
Vest End,
South Ual I
East End,
tlorth tJal I
lst
lst
lst
lst
znd
2nd
Lift
Li ft
Li ft
Li ft
Lt ft
Li ft
t2l .6
127.6
121 .6
lzl .6
121 .6
12r.6
lr.8
11 .8
11 .8
r1.8
11.8
11 .8
119.0
12t.1
t2?.I
r22.3
t?2.4
l?2.0
1I
10.9
10.3
1l.e
-l .l . v
5
11.0
98
100
100
100
100
100
Sandy Graveily Clay
Sandy Gravel ly Cl ay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
Sandy Gravelly CI ay
Sandy Gravel ly CI ay
Sandy Gravelly Cl ay
FULL TII,IE OBSERVATIOII X PART TII.IE OESERVATIOII
rxrs neTdFenesuiiopinians ronrro As A rEsuLt or our oss-F6vilrots,gf FM F!AgEt_4E!! . , -vq. lAvE RELIEo oN lHE coi{tRAc]gn r0
iiiii riiub-Applii[e -iie- niCorairDeo ao*AcrlvE EFFoir ANo l'orsluRE 1o FILL ttoRrt{c IHE rrfies HHE ol.tl ossERvER ls t{or oBsEnvr o
6iERiti&d:' -iilrs iiie'-|,lloE oF-iHe Fiu. oftly As rBLrgvED f{€c€ssABy ro cALtBRAiE otR oBSEFyER's Juoe€}t€t{T. tEst oArA AQ€ l{or
THC SOLE BASTS FOR OPINIO}IS OII IJT'ET}IEN THE FILL I.€ETS SPECIFICATIONS.
THE ilUCLEAR DE}IS(IIIETER I.IETHOD OF TESTII{6 UAS USED Iil SUB5TAI{TIAL ACCORDAT{CE IIITH ASTiI 02992 AI{O 03017.
PRELII'iII|ARY 0BSERVATI0I{S AND/0R TEST RESULTS VERBALLY REPORTEO T0: Yoodv
PROGRESS REPORT:
CoPIES: Beck and Associ ates.
sandi R. Cody Fred R. Carneron
FIELD OESERVER APPROVED BY
lrf
CHEN.NORTHERN, INC.
co0lsulT I llc EllGIllEERs AllD SCIEilTISIS
REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
T0: l'lr. llalid Said JOB t{0. 4 445 93-t DATE: 10-27-93
1100 ltorth Frontage Road
Yail. c0 01657
OAILY REPORT I{0. 6 SHEET T OF 2
PR0JECT: Savoy ViIIas, Vail, Colorado.
IJEATHER CONOITIOI{5 AilD TEIiPERATURE:
COI{TRACTOR'S COilSTRUCTIOH ACTIVITIES:
PERSOI{iIEL:
r,rAJ0R EQUIPIIEI{T:
ACTiVITIES:
CHE'{-IIORTHERI{'S SITE ACIIVITIES
He performed dengity tests.All tests parsed,
VEREAL COffiIIITICATIOII UITH COI{TRACTOR, EfiqIilEER, ARCHITECT, OgflER
COPIES: Beck and Associ ates;
I sunai n. coay
I FrELD oBSERVER
Fred R, Cameron
APPROV€O BY
Ar r nuturl orotactlon to c1l.ntr, tha Fubllc and ogtt.lv.a, .ll raporti qr. 3uhnlttrd at th. confld.ntlrl_ prop.rty of our_cll.ntt. and
.it i"lii"iio5'i"" o"lficlit"n or rirtroeirt, Coralu3tonr or .rtr.ctt iroa or rtg.rdlng ouF t.p.ort. lt r.3rrv.d F.nding oqr rrltt.n rpProv.l.
Si#iirttiji br dliporrd ol rft.r t..tlhg l. conDl.t..l unltti oth.r .Fi..ng.ttL|rtt .r. .gr..d to In d|.ttlng.
A fidrb.r of th. lIE grouD of cooDrnl.t
CHEN.NORT}IERN, INC.
coNsulTlrq sfictal€ERs Aa{D scrENTrsts
REPORT OF FIELD NUCLEAR DENSIW TESTING
T0; t{r. llalid Satd JOB l{0. 4 445 93-l DATE: i0-e7-93
1i00 llorth Frontage Road
VaiI, C0 81657
DAILY REPORT ilo, 6 SHEET 2 OF 2
PR0JEC1: Savoy Vi l l as, Vai l , Colorado.
SPEC]FICATIOil CO}.IPACTIOI{ & I4ATERIAL
l,lIl{IHUlt RE0UIRED Ii|-PLACE DEIISITY: 95X AS OETER[{I|{E0 8Y: ASTI'I 0-698
CottSTRUCIIotl C0I{TRACT0R I Arrow Excayati on TEST L0CATI0}|S I{ERE ScLECTE0 BY: Chen-l{orthern
TYPE AND llUl,lBER 0F EAITH l,loV Il{G ul{lTS: 1 Loader
TYPE At{D tlt$l8ER 0F Col'lPACTI0l{ UlllTS: Full Loader, Sheepsfoot. IHICKNESS 0F LIFT: 8"
ltETH0D 0F ADDIIIG !,IoISTURE: llUl'l8ER 0F PASSES: As Requi red
TEST
N0.
LOCATIOII
OEPTH OR
ELEVATIOI{
(FEET)
IABSATqRY
-
]FI lL0
PERCEI{T
(RELATiVE/
ilAXIlluit)
OSTAIilED
SOIL TYPE
IrtAIIlltltl
BRY
OEI{SITY
(pcf)
DPTII.IUH
l.t0IsT|JRE
COIITENT
(x)
DRY
DEIISITY
(PCF)
I.{OISTURE
c0t{TEl{T
0
9
10
ll
tz
East End,
South t{al i
East End,
llorth lJal I
Itti d South Ual I
ltid t{orth Ual l
East End,
South Ual I
Uest End,
orth tlal I
3rd
3rd
4th
4th
5th
5th
Li ft
Li ft
Li ft
Lifr
Lift
Lift
121.6
121 .5
l2l .6
t?l .6
121 .6
121 .6
u.8
11.8
11.8
11 ,8
11.8
11.8
tzz.s
121 .9
t22.1
122.3
t?2.7
i21.8
LZ.2
l1 .9
10.8
lt a
12 .0
l, I
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sandy Gravel ly Cl ay
Sandy Gravel ly C1 ay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
Sandy Gravelly Cl ay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
FULL TIIIE OBSERVATIOII X - PART TII.IE (IESERVAITO'I
rxrs neEFi-pnts$lts op$rtoNs Fos.tED As A R€sull oF c{rR oEsERYATroNs oF FILL prtcEfiE{r. l,E HAVE EgLrEo o ltlE co|{lRActon to
cor{tt uE AppLyt c THE n€eo}rrENDqo cor.rpAcTlvE EFFoRT Ar{0 lloIsTOR€ rO FlLl orJRtN€ tHE trlrEs r*r$t oirR ogsEsvER ls NoT ossEBvI[G
oP€MTioNs. Tcsis ARE tuD€ oF THE FILL d{LY As EELI€V€D NECESSARY 'o CALIDNATE OT,f, OESERVER'S JUDGE:I'IENT. TEST OA'A ARE NO'
THE SOL€ SASIS FOR OPIi{IOI{S ON UHETHER Tt{E FILL MEETS SP€CIFICA'IOIIS.
THE IIUCLEAR DEllSol,lETER llETH0D 0F TESTIT{G tlAs USt0 Il{ SUBSTAIITIAL ACC0RDA|iCE UITH ASTI{ D2992 At{D 03017.
PReLIitIf{ARY OESERVATI0I{S AllD/oR TEST RESULTS VERBALLY REPoRTED T0: lloody
PROGRESS REPORT:
COPIES: Seck and Assoc i ates.
Sandi f,. Cody Fred R. Cameron
FIELD OESERVER APPROVED BY
Aa a outual tiotact{gn to cll.ntt, ttt. publlc.nd ourt.lv.i, rll r.tort$
and .uthor{e.tlon for psbllcttloD ot ttltat nt. cohc'lu3lonl ot attr.cta
.FpFovrl. slnplar wtll ba dlrpoaad oa attar tarttng lt conplatad unl$t
A rn.l|rblr of th. !!! giouF ot conlFrnl.i
rrl aubn{t.t.d a! thr contldantl.I pioFrrty of oqt cllanttr
fi.o|! or r.agrrdlng our t.Dottt It r.aarvad p.ndtng oqr rtitta[oth.r aria|rgniaati aia agr'a.d to I|' llrJtltg.
-t
CHEN.NORTHERN, INC.
COiISULT IIIG EIIGTIIEERS AilD SCIEIITISTS
REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
T0: t{r. tlalid Said JOB }10- 4 445 93-1 DATE: 10-28-93
1100 llorth Frontage Road
Vait, C0 81657
DAiLY REPORT I{0. 7 SHEET I OF 2
PR0JECT: Savoy Villas, Yail, Colorado,
IIEATHER COI{DITIOI{S AI{O TII{PIRAIURE :
COI{TRACTOR'S COIISTRUCTIOTT ACTIVITIES :
PERS0l{llEL: Arros Excavati on.
I.IAJOR EQUIPI.IEI{T:
ACTIVITIES:
CHEII-IIORTHERII'S SITE ACTIVITIES
l{oody renoved the fifth Itft because of frost and punpi ng, so lt $as replaced nith 6-inch llfts
(8-inch maxlnuml before PecomPacti ng '
VERBAL COHII[IHICATIOI| I'IITH C0ilTRACT0R' EtlGIl{EER' ARCIIITECT, 0l,llER
COPlES: Beck and Associates;
t
II Sandl R. Cody Fred R. Cameron
I FI€LO OESERVER APPROVED 8Y
Ai. |t|utual rrotactlor to cllantrr thr publlc and ouis.lvar. .lt r.portr rr. tubrrltt.d a3 th. contld.ntl.l proParty of our'cl{.nta, .nd
iiiti..iiiii.i'f-o. ;ilb il.lt t;n oi si.irnr.it. corclu3lon3 or eitractr iiqi ot r-.grrdlnt our r.portr lr r.t.rv.d iondlng'our t{rltt.h rPProvrl 'S.nEt.c rlll b. dirpo.ad ot !tt.r t.rtl|r9 {r conpl.tad unlair othar lrr.ngah.ntt rrt .gr.ad to ln w|.ltlhE.
A ft.|nbcr ot th. !!M srou! o{ eoNip.nl.s
CHEN.NORTHERN, INC.
cor{lluLTlfl€ €it{6rtl€E Fs Al{D sclEt{tlsTs
REPOFT OF FIELD NUCLEAR DENSITY TESTING
Ar a huturl Frot.ctlon tg cltarlr, tht Fqbttc and o{tialv.r, !ll raFoFtt .r'. aub{ltta.l ar th. contld.htlal Froparty ot our sllants'
rnd rqthorlz.tlon lor publlc.tion ot ttrtanant, coiclualonr 9r.ntrrct3 ?rod or r'.gardlDg our r.Dortt It rr.'..v.d. Pandlnt o.ll" Lilitan
arDrovrl. sdt|pl.t lli lra dl.Por.d ot rlt.r t..tlhg la cotnplat.d unla.. oth'r !'r'Dgr'o'ntt 'r"grt'd to ln |.iltlhg'
A;drb.r ot th. ts!! gFolrF ot conp.|'l.r
T0: Hr. Yalld Said JOB ltO. 4 445 S3-1 OATE: 10'?8'93
1100 l{orth Frontage RoadVail, C0 81657
OAITY REPORT IIO. 7 5HEET 2 OF Z
PR0JECT: Savoy Vlllas, Vail. Colorado.
SPECIFICATI()It COI,IPACTIOII & I,IATERIAL
tlll{Iltuf,l REQUIREO II{-PIACE DE]I$ITY: 95X AS 0ETERtlIllEO 8Y: ASTII D-698
ColtSTRUCTIOlt C0NTRACTOR: Arroe Excavation TEST L0CATI0I'IS UERE SETECTED BY: Chen-l{orthern
TYPE All0 ltUltBER 0F EARTH ll0VIl{G UiIITS: I Loader
TYPE AllD tlUt4BER 0F C0t{PACTI0tl UtlITS: I Full Loader, I Sheepsfoot. THICKITESS 0F LIFT:
l,lETHlD 0F ADDIT{6 I.I0ISTURE: I{UHBER 0F PASSES: Ag Requi red
TEST
tto .
LOCAT I OIt
DEPTH OR
EL€VATIOI{
(FEET)
PERCEI{T
(RELAI IVE/
}IAXIilW)
OBTATIIEO
SOIL TYPE
l,rAx
ORY
DEI{SITY
lpcf)
oPT I t{ul,l
ITIOISTURE
coilTEt{T
(x)
ORY
DEIISITY
(PCF)
c0t{TEt{T
(z)
IIOISTURE
14
l5
IO
L7
l8
East End,
South l{al l
llest End,
tlorth ljal I
tlid South l{al I
I'li d orth Ual I
Uest End,
l{orth Ual I
East End,
l{orth Ual I
sth Lift
sth Lift
6th Lifr
6th Li tr
7th Lrft
7th Li.ft
l?t .6
121. 6
121 .6
121 .6
1Zt .6
121.6
u.8
lr.8
II,U
11.8
1t a
11 ,8
121.9
122.3
t22,0
r22.5
121
t?2.0
I
9.8
10.1
9.8
lt.0
oq
9.8
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sandy 6ravel ly Cl ay
Sandy Gravel ly Cl ay
Sandy Gravel ly Ciay
Sandy Gravel ly Cl ay
Sandy Gravelly Cl ay
Sandy Graveily Clay
FUtt TII'IE OBSERVATIOI{ X PART TII'IE OESERVATIOI{
rxrs nEFffiipnesafs optNtoRs roFlt€D ls e nesutt oF oue 6E-mrro s oF ptrLt pLAcE lE]rt. \{€ ifivE F€LtEo oM THe coNrRAdtof, To
CO|'I$,E APPL'II C IHE RECOII,IEXO€O CO+{9ACTIV€ EFFOR? AIIO TFISTUNE TO FILL DURING THE TI}ICS UI{€I{ OUf, OESERV€R IS NO7 OSSSRVI'.O
OPENATIO'IS. 1ESIS ATE I4AOE OF tItE FILL OIILY AS EELIEVEO II€C€SSAIY TO CALIENATE C{,R OSSENVEN'S
'IUDq€MENT.
?EsT OAIA AR€ TOT
TfI€ SOLE 8A5IS FOR OFIHIOIIS OI{ 'II{ET}IER THE FILL I.I€STS SPECIFICATTOI{s.
THE IIUCLEAR DEI{SOI|ETER t'lETH0D 0F TESTII{G UAS UsEtt M SUBSTAI{TIAL ACC0ROAilCE UITH ASTII 02992 A}lD 03017.
PRELIHII{ARY OBSERVATIOI{S AIID/OR TEST RESULTS VEREALLY REPORTED TO:
PROGR€SS REPORT:
COP IES: Beck and Assooiates.
Sandi R. Cody Fred R. Cameron
F1ELO OSSERVER APPIOVED BY
-I
CHEN-NORTHERN, INC.
co{s[,LT I llc EltGlllEERs All0 scl€llTlsrs
REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
T0: Hr. Ualid Said J08 tiO. 4 445 93-1 DATEr 10-e9-93
1100 ilorth Frontage Road
Vail, C0 81657
DAILY REPORT NO. O SHEET 1 OF 2
Pfi,0JECT: Savoy Villas, Vail, Colorado.
I'EATHER COIIDITIOI{S At{D TEiIPERATTJR€:
COI{TRACTOR'S COIISTRUCTIOII ACTIV ITIES :
PERS0I{I{EL: Arrow €xcavation '
I.IAJOR EQUIPIIEIIT:
ACTIVITIES I
CHCil.ilORTHERI{'S SITE ACTIVITIES
Ue perfoned densi ty tests.All tests passed.
VERBAL COIII.IIJI{ICATIOII UITH COIIIRACTOR, EIIGI ilEEN, ARCHITECT, OUIIER
COPIES: 8€ck and Associ ates l
I
I Sanat n, Cody Fred R. Cameron
I FIELD OSSERVTR APPROVED 8Y
Aa I iuturl paotact{ot to cllrntr. tha Fubllc.nd osr..lv.a, .ll t'apori,t arr aubnltt.d ar th. confldantlel propaFty ot our ctlantr. rDdruthorlrrtlon for Fubllcltlon ol rtrtinant, Conclualonr or rttFrclt lFoo or r.grrdlng our riaFo|.ir lr r'.ttr.v.C pandlng oor wFltt.n.ppt"ovrl.S{ pl.r rrlll ba dlsporad ot att.r trrt{ng lr cdtrFl.t.d unl.rr otiar' rrr.ng.n|.rtt .ia rgr.rd to lh rrlt{hg.
A t|lc|nb.r of th. EM group ot c6oF.hl..
I
T0: llr. l,lat id Said J08 N0. 4 445 93-i DATE: i0-29-93
1100 [orth Frontage Road
Vail, C0 81657
DAILY RTPORT I{0. 8 SHEET 2 OF 2
PR0JECT: Savoy Yillas, Vail, Colorado.
SPECIFICATIOII CO},IPACTi()t{ & I'IATERIAL
ItINII{ul,l REQUIRED M-PLACE DEIISITY: 95X AS 0ETERI'|I[{E0 BY: ASm 0-698
C0|{STRUCTIOiI C0iITRACT0R: Arrou Excavation TEST L0CATI0IIS UERE SELECTE0 BY: Chen-llorth€rn
TYPE AtlD ttul,l8tR 0F EARTH KlVIllG Ul{lTS: I Loader
TYPE AI{D NUI.ISER OF COI{PACTIOI{ UI{ITS: 1 FU]I LOAdET THICKIIESS (lF LIFT:
I'iETH0D 0F ADDIIIG lt0lSTUE: t{t !,l8ER 0F PASSES: As Requlred
tt)l
lio.
LOCATIOII
OEPTH OR
ELEVATIOI{
(FEET)
PERCEITT
( RELATIVE/
HAXIItUil)
OBTAIIIED
SOIL TYPE
ltAxiltull
ORY
DEIIStTY
lpcf)
TIOISTI,,RE
coilTEt{T
DRY
DEI{S ITY
(PCF)
CONTENT
I,IOI STURE
t9
z0
2l
22
t1
z4
l,ll d t{orth Ual I
East End,
t{orth ltal I
llest End,
tiorth tdal I
t{i d l{orth lJal I
East End,
llorth l/al I
Uest End,
l{orth tlal l
| {f+
Lift
Lift
Li ft
Lift
Li ft
8th
8th
8th
9th
9th
9th
121 .6
1Zl .6
121 .6
121.5
121 .6
121.5
1t .8
11.8
11 .8
ll.8
ll .8
ll.8
IZ2.l
l2l .9
123 .0
t22.2
121.8
122.9
10.2
9.8
10.0
10.4
9.8
10.2
100
100
100+
100
100
100+
Sandy Gravelly Clay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
Sandy Gravelly Cl ay
Sandy Gravel ly Clay
Sandy Gravelly Clay
FULL TIItE 0BSERVATIoII L PART TIlilE 0ESERVATI0I|
rrrs nFffipcesixrioprnrors FosiE$ As A REsuLr oF ouR oEsEEfauo.rs gF F'LL pLAcE!E!!- vr lAvE RELTED ofi tHE coNlR cloR To
iiifiiriile-Aipivilra rHe REcor'rfi€fogD co'FAcrtv€ EFFoRt ANo r,orstunE ro FILL D{rRrt{B rH€ tlltEs lHE olrl ossERvEn ls ol oSsEFYrNc
O'ERATiO(S. IESIS AET AD€ OF THE FII.L OI{!Y AS B€LIEVTD T{ECESSANY IO CALIBRATE O['N OBSERVER'S .}UO6€I{€I{T. TESI OAIA ARE I{OT
TltE SOIE sASIs FoR opttlloMt Olr l*lEtHER tHE FILL l.lEETS SPECIFICATIONIS.
THE IIUCLEAR OEIISOIIETER I.IETHOO OF TESIII{G I{AS USED III SUESTAI{TIAL ACCOROAIICE UITH ASTI.I 02992 AiID 03017.
PRELII.IIIIARY OBSERVATIOI{S AND/OR TEST RESULTS VERBALLY REPORTEO TO:
PROGRESS REPORT:
COPIEST Beck and Assooi ates.
Sandi R. Cody Fred R. Caneron
FIELD OBSERVER APPROVEO BY
CHEN.NORTHERN, INC.
co sulTtx6 EI{€INEERS AflO SCISNIISTS
REPORT OF FIELD NUCLEAR DENSITY TESTING
Ar . nstual paotactlon to cll.ntar th. publ{c .nd oul-3alv.t. all t Fort! afr ssbrlttad ia tha cottldatrtlrl prop.rty ot our alla'lti,
rhd ruthorlztt.lon for publlc.tlotr ot rt.tairant, conclurlon. oi .rtract. ff.oQ o. rrtardlrg our r.Forta lr t.tar-v.d pandln! our. rttittan
.FFrov.1. S.|nFl.i wlll b. dlrpo..d cl rtt.i tartlhg lt conpl.t.d urlar! othar .rrrnEdrintr ar. rgrrad to In wr'ltlng.
A mrnb.r ot th. !!! SrorP ot cotrFatl.i
NGr.,'"29-1993 11: 16 I4ONRflE & IIEUELL ,/ DEI]UERI
& Nen'ell
Elrgimers, Irc.
343 523 669? ,F"01
I\donroe
1860 lTUr 5t,, $rite 350
llcrw€r, Coloralto atoi:0z
{iJgJ} ozu-11r27
FAx (:rGt) 0A}-S{J0A
Froject #
Pages
(includi ng transmiHal)
FACSIMILE TRAN$MITTAL LETTEN
TO
***o* *fpai. #--,a\L
l,t-toNH
rnx t-&14:&464,, -.-
FBoM OF*U . - -- -***"tru ,AIJfut:
rtfi-frt{l-elu+ #Hta *T€ Nw'lil+* ffi)rwW.*e ,W-'Tr/e.
SUBJECT
MESSAGE
frtu
itfpet
'-fF
wb
lf transrnittal is not as indicated please notify sender
IU IHL P..U1
l'tFR-18-1994 A8:Ar
lrENRoE
& NET,JELL
S Monroe &Ntvrell 11JAt Ea*heqt rtr l=/.\ *s,"-*ffi+mffi
l=
rour-owtn{t''funs Noreo :
qat AMlAt PM
CQFIES TO
I
-. , 9,44- 4sts* . - .. -,
TOTAL P.A1
I
TOWN OFVATI
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I s8 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-24s2
Septpmber 13, 1993
DS
D epartn en t of C onunun iry Deve lopn e tt
Mr. Andy Beck
Beck and Associates, lnc.
P.O. Box 4030
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Town of Vail Building Permit Application - Phase l, Savoy Villas (1100 North Frontage
Road)
Dear Andy:
The Town of Vail Planning Department has reviewed your building permit applicalion for the
above-mentioned project and has approved the application with the following conditions:
I. That a minimum clearance of 8' - 0" be provlded along the berm to the south of
Lionsridge Loop Road for Town of Vail snow storage and drainage, unless
approved otherwise by the Town of Vail Engineer.
2. That the maximum height ot retaining walls for this project be as noted on the
approved conslruction documents, with the provision that no wall be any higher
than 6' - 0".
3. That the trash facility, proposed to be located on the western portion of this site,
be provided as a part of this Phase I construction.
4. That the maximum roof elevations, lo be verified by an lmprovement Location
Certificate at the time of framing, shallbe as follows:
a. Unit A-1lB-1 = Elevalion 8145
b, Unit A-2/B-2 = Elevation 8150
c. Unit A-3/B-3 = Elevation 8150
d. Unit A-4/B-4 = Elevation 8154
5. That any project sign or signs shall need a separate Design Review Board
(DRB) approval prior to installation on this site. A sign applicalion may be
obtained from the Office of Community Development.
r-
_ Mr. Beck
September 13, 1993
Page Two
6. That all new landscaping, to be associated with this Phase I construction, shall
consist of the plantings designated within the same boundaries as the Phase I
'limits of site disturbance", as indicated on Sheet No. 41.2.
Prior to the Town's issuance of any Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for this Phase I
construction, the following must be completed:
1. The removal of the viewing platform.
2. The developer shall grant the Town of Vail a drainage easement through the
property, to provide for the existing drainage flow which currently enters the site
between the proposed employee housing building and the eastern condominium
building on the upper bench.
3. The developer shall provide a bike path easement for any portion of the
relocated Town of Vail bike path which shall be located upon the developer's
Property.
Should the developer propose any changes or moditications to the Town of Vail approved
construction documents, please contact the Town of Vail Building Department and receive all
required approvals prior to the construction and/or installation of said modifications.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding any of the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
fu* /%zz:_
Mike Mollica
Assistant Director of Planning
xc: Sally Brainerd, Morter Architects
Gary Murrain -Dan Stanekv
Greg Hall
I /t:-.ti,-- '- .--.t" ,? 0
I A Prot€ssional Corporation
143 East Msadow Driv€
Crossrcads at vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
303/47G5105
303/476-0710 Fax
MonrERARCHtrEcrs
Letter of Transmittal
Dat6:
to:
Projectr
September 16, 1993
Dan
Town of Vail
Savoy Villas
Please ftnd enclosed the following:
9/16/93 Sheets X1, X2, and X3
Buitding Permit Application Revision
Flema s:an,
This is to clarify our discussion today.lf you need anything else, please let me know
Copies
1
1
lytsrainerd
!'i;i Eiisi L{.,,aco!"'r)rvr
Llra55r4.ars i:t Vnil
Vaii, C0 cradn B l15;
303/476,5105
FAX 303t476 0/10
MoruER,i\irr -r lli[(" I :
1.
2.
3.
BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION REVISION
SAVOY VILLAS
9/16/93
Sheets X1, X2, and X3 indicate dimension changes to the floors plans.
Specifically, all exterior openings must be a minimum of 3'-O" away from
the centerline of the area separation wall,
The exterior porch roof which connects the two buildings together must
be of 1-hour fire-rated construction. One layer of 5/8" gyp. board is to
be added to the top and bottom of the roof structure in that area.
No plumbing, mechanical, or electrical wiring or equipment is allowed to
penetrate the 2 layers of 5/8" gyp. board on either side of the area
separation wall.
It
GARAGE B
@
L
I
BASE UNII - AtI NOryI MRR0R-I]ilAGE
-fJ
MIRROR-IMAGE UNIT
\lk
fi
t
I
1l
'l
l"
t,,I
F
I
o
E
DE
I@
MFn0E:UAGE_!X[BASE UNfT - Att NOIES TYPICAL OF IIIRROR IIIACE UNII
-
t
75 south fronlage road
vall, colorado 61657
(303) 479-21.38 ot 479-2139
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
olflco of communlly developmanl
ALL CONTRACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED IIITH THE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI
MARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & I,TATERIAL STORAGE
In summary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for any
person to litter, track or deposit any soil, rockr sand, debris
or naterial, including trash dumpsters, portable toilets and
ltorkrnen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, a1ley or public
place or any portion thereof. 3he right-of-way on all Town ofVaiI streets and roads is approxinately 5 ft. off pavernent.
This ordinance wlll be strictly enforced by the Town of Vail
Public l{orks Departnent. Fersons found violatLng this ordlnancewill be gJ.ven a 24 hour written notlce to rernove said material'In the event the person so notified does not cornply with the
notice within the 24 hour tine specified, the Public Works
Department will remove said material at the expense of Personnotified. Bhe provJ.sions of this ordinance shal-l not be
applicable to construction, maintenance or repair projects of
any street or alley or any utitities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No. 5 in full' please stop by the Town ofvail Building Department to obtain a copy. Thank you for your
cooperation on this natter.
knowledged
(i.e. contractor, owner)
/
Town of Vail
25 South Frontage RoadVaiI, Colorado 8L657(303) 479-2138
Plan analysis based on
the 1991- Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 91493
Address: 11OO N. FRONTAGE RD
Contractor: BECK e ASSOC
Architect: MORTER
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL
NOTE:The code items lisLed in this report
listing of al-I possible code requirements
selected secLions of the code.
Name: SAVOY VILLASDate: September L4,
Occupancy: R3rMl
Type of Const: v-N
Plans Examiner: DAN
are not intended toin the 1991 UBC. It
PHASE A1
1993
STANEK
be a completeis a guide to
DIRECTION BOUNDARY
NORTH Property lineEAST Building
SOUTH Property line
WEST Property line
SEPARATION
AREA INCREASE
50.0 Feet0.0 Feet
20.0 Feet
25.0 Feet
FTRE PROTECTION
50.0 Feet
0.0 Feet.
20.0 Feet
25.0 Feet
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 17-A & ?able 5-A
NORTH
OCC BRG NON_BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr None
M]- Ohr Ohr None
EAST SOUTH
BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROTthr* Lhr* NOP Ohr Ohr None
thr* thr* NOP Ohr Ohr None
WEST
BRG NON-BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT
Ohr Ohr None
Ohr Ohr None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTIBLE material . Sec.22AL.
None -- No fire protection reguirements for openings.
Prot -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies.
50? of t.he area of the wal"l maximum. Sec.2203. (b) & Table 5-A
Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft with no dimensiongreater than L2 feet.. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wa1l.* -- These walls may be required to have a parapet wa1I 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet wall is reguired to have the same
fire rating as the wa1l. See section 1710. for details and except.ions
Town of Vail
25 South Frontage Road
Vail' Colorado 81657(303) 4'79-2L38
Plan analysis based on
the 1-99L Uniform Building code
project Number: 91"493 Name: SAVOY VILLAS PHASE A2
addiess: 1100 N. FRoNTAGE RD Date: Septenber 14, 1-993
Contractor: BECK & ASSoC Occupancy: R3rM1
Architect: MORTER TYPe of Const: V-N
Engineer: MONROE & NEWEtt Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
NOTE:The code iterns list.ed in this report are not intended to be a complete
Iisting of aII possible code requirements in the 1991 UBC. It is a guide to
selected sections of the code.
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 45.0 Feet 45.0 Feet
EAST Building 6.0 Feet 3.0 Feet
SOUTH Property l1ne 10.0 FeeL L0.0 Feet
WEST Building 0.0 Feet 0.0 Feet
EXTERIOR WAI,L FIFJE RATINGS AND OPENING PRO?ECTION
TabLe 17-A & Table 5-A
NORTII EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG
WALL WATL PROT WALL WALL PROT WAL[' WAI-,L PROT WALL WALL PROT
R3 Qhr Ohr None Ofhr Ohr NOP Ohr Ohr None Lhr* thr* None
Ml ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr NoP Ohr Ohr None thr* thr* None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTIBLE material . Sec .2201 .
None -- No fire protecUion reguirements for openings.
Prot -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 ht fire assemblies.
508 of the area of the waII maxirnum. Sec.2203.(b) & Table 5-A
Maximum sinqle window size is 84 sq.fL with no dimension
great.er than l-2 feeL. -- sec. 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not perrnitted in this walt.* -- These walls may be required to have a parapet wall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet walt is required to have the same
fire rating as the waIl. See section l,?10. for details and exceptions.
Town of Vail
25 South Frontage Road
Vai1, Colorado 81657(303) 479-2t38
' Plan analysis based on
the 1991 Uniform Building Code
lroject Number: 91493 Name: SAVOY VILLAS PHASE A3
Address: 11-00 N. FRONTAGE RD Date: September 14' 1993
Contractor: BECK & ASSOC Occupancy: R3rML
ArchitecL: MORTER Type of Const.: V-N
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL Plans Examj.ner: DAN STANEK
NOTE:The code iLems listed in Lhis report are not intended to be a complete
Iisting of all posslble code requi-rements in the 1991 UBC. It is a guide to
selected sections of the code '
SEPARATTON
DTRECTION BOUNDARY AREA TNCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 43.0 Feet 43.0 Feet
EAST Building 0.0 Feet 0.0 Feet
SOUTH ProperLy line 8.0 Feet 8.0 FeeL
WEST Building 6.0 Feet 3.0 Feet
EXTERIOR WALL F]RE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table l-7-A & Table 5-A
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WAT,L PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr None thr* lhr* NOP Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
M1 Ohr Ohr None thr* thr* NOP Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTfBLE material. Sec .2201 .
None -- No fire protection requirements for openings.,
Prot. -- Openings are to be protecLed with 3/4 hr fire assembl-ies'
508 of Lhe area of the wall maximum. Sec.2203.(b) & TabLe 5-A
Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft. with no dimension
greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wa}l.* -- These wal1s may be required to have a parapet wall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapeL wall is required to have the same
fire rating as the wall. See section 1?10. for details and except.ions.
Town of vail
25 South FronLage RoadVail, Colorado 81657(303) 4'19-2t38
Plan analysis based onthe 1991- Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 9L493 Nane: SAVOY VILLAS PHASE A4
Address: 1100 N. FRONTAGE RD DaLe: September 14' 1993
contractor: BECK & ASSOC Occupancy: R3rM1
ArchitecL: MORTER Type of Const.: V-N
Engi.neer: MONROE & NEWELL Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
NOTE:The code items l-isted in lhis report are not intended to be a compleEe
listing of aII possible code requirements in the L991- UBC. ft. is a guide to
selected sections of the code.
SEPAFATION
DTRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 39.0 Feet 39.0 Feet
EAST Building 6.0 Feet 3.0 Feet
SOUTH Property line 19.0 Feet 19.0 Feet
WEST Building 0.0 Feet 0.0 Feet
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 17-A & Table 5-A
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG
WALL WATJL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALI' WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr None 01hr Ohr NOP Ohr Ohr None thr* i.hr* None
M1 Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr NOP Ohr Ohr None l-hr* thr* None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTfBLE rnaterial. Sec .220L.
None -- No fire protection requirements for openings.
Prot -- Openings are to be prot.ected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies.
50ts of the area of the wall naximum. Sec.2203.(b) & Table 5-A
Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft with no dimension
greater than 12 feet. -- Sec, 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wall.* -- fhese wal-ls may be required to have a parapet wall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet waII is required to have the same
fire rating as the waII. See section L710. for details and exceptions.
FL NAME AREA MIN.LIGHT MIN.VENT NO.BXITS EGRESS
3 Master bedroom 224
3 Master bath I21
3 Ha]1s, closets, etc. 86
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 43'7
2 Kitchen 89
2 Living c Dining room 365
2 Powder room 52
2 Bedroom #l- 131
2 Bath room #l- 33
2 Bedroom #2 136
2 BaLh room #2 46
2 Ha1ls, closets, etc. 476
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 1328
1 carage 277
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 211
BUILDING TOTAL 2042
FOOTNOTES:
22 .40
0 .00
0 .00
10.00
0.00
13.10
0.00
13.60
0.00
0-00
0 .00
LL.20
6 .35
0 .00
I
L
1
l_
L
L
1I
I
l_
t
1
L
l_
l_
1
1
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
5.00
18 .25
2.50
6 .55
r..65
6.80
2.30
0 .00
0.00
l") EGRESS - An operable wj-ndow or door that opens directly t.o the exterior
is required from this room. The minimum clear openable area must meet
the following. -- Sec. L204.
1) The minimum clear height is 24 inches
2) The minimum clear width is 20 i-nches
3) The minimum clear area is 5.? square feet
4l The maximum sill height is 44 inches
2\ The number of exit.s is based on Table 33-A (Dwellings)
3) A mechanical ventilation system may be used in in lieu of exterior
openings for ventilation. -- Sec. 1205. (c)
ROOM DIMENSIONS:
Habitable space sha11 have a ceiling height. of not less than 7 feet 6
inches. Kitchens, halls, bathrooms and toilet compartments may have a
ceiling height of 7 feet measured to the lowest projection. If the ceiling
is sloping, then the minimum height is required in only I/2 of t.he area.
--Sec. 120?. (a)
Every dwelling unit shall have aL least one room which has noL less than L20
square feet of floor area. Other habitable rooms excepL kitchens sha1l have
an area of not less than 70 square feet. -- sec . 1207 . (bj
Habit.able rooms other than a kilchen shalt not be less than 7 feet in any
dimension. -- Sec. L2Q'7. (cl
GLAZING REQU]REMENTS:All glazing in hazardous locations
glazing material . -- Sec. 5406. (d)
is required to be of safetv
1-) Glazing in ingress and egress doors
2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels
panels in swinging doors other than
3) Glazing in storm doors.
4) Glazing in alL unframed swinging doors.
except jalousies.
of sliding door assemblies and
wardrobe doors.
5)"GIazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunasr stean
rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a building wa1}
enclosing these conpartmenLs where the boLtom exposed edge of the
glazinq is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inIet,,
6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest
exposed edge of the glazxing is within a Z4-inch arc of either vertical-
edge of the door in a closed position and where the boltom exposed edge
of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface.
7't Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel' other than those
locations described in items 5 and 6 above, t.han meets all of the
followingr conditions :
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet.
B, Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor.
C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizont.ally of the
plane of the glazing.
B) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface.
Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in-fill
panels.
SMOKE DETECTOR REQUIREMENTS:
A smoke detector is required on the ceiling or walI at
located in t.he corridor or area giving access to each
-- Sec. L210. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is reguired on the ceiling or waII in
area. -- Sec. 1210. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is required on aLl stories. -- Sec. 12L0.(a) 4-
If the upper level contains sleeping room(s), a smoke detector is reguired
in the ceiling of the upper level close to the stairway.
-- Sec. 1210. (a) 4
Smoke deLectors are required to be wired to the building's power source and
shall be eguipped wiLh a battery backup. -- sec. L21"0.(a) 3.
Detectors snjff sound an alarm audible in all sleeping area of the dwelling
in which they are located. -- Sec. 12L0. (a) 4.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION:
Bet.ween Lhe garage and the residence, materials approved for thr fire
construction are required on Lhe garage side only and any doors belween
Lhe garage and the residence are to be a self-closing l3/8 inch solid
core door or a 20 minute fire door. -- Table 5-B & Sec. 503.(d) exc. #3
STAIR REQUIREMENTS:
A stairway in a dwelling must be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 3306.(b)
The rnaximum rise of a step is I inches and Lhe minimum run is 9 inches.*- sec. 3306. (c) exc. #Lprovide a handrail on one side a stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if
there is 4 or more risers- :- Sec. 3306. (i)
provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. Minimun height
= 36 inches, maximum opening size = 4 inches. -- Sec. L"llz.(al exc. #L
Tbe minimum headroom is 6 ft..- I inches. -- Sec. 3306.(o)
Enc1osed usable space under the stairs is reguired to be protected as required
for Lhr fire-resistive construction. -- Sec. 3305. (1)
a point centrally
sleeping area.
each sleeping
SHAFT ENCLOSURES:
i-) Chutes and dumbwaiter shafts with a cross-sectional- area of not more than
9 square feet may lined on the inside with not less than 26 gage
galvani-zed sheet meLal with al1 joints locklapped. The outside must be
i. hr construction. AII openingrs into any such enelosure shall be protected
by not less than a self-closing solid wood door L 3/8 inches thick or
equivalent. -- Sec. 1706. (f)
2) Gas vents and noncombustible piping installed in walls passing through
3 floors or }ess do not need t.o be in t hour shafLs.
-- Sec. 1706. (c)
3) All other shafts are required to be enclosed in a t hour assembly.
-- Sec. 1705. (a)
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS :
For R3 occupancyThis project. will require a site improvement survey. Such survey
shall be submitted and approved prior to request for frame
inspecLion.
AIl crawl spaces within t.he Town Of Vail are limited to a earth to
structural floor ceiling heighL of 5t, be earth floor only, be
vent.ilated as per UBC 2516 (C) 6 with minimum access as per UBC
2515(C)2 and maximum accesa of 9 sq. ft.
Any building site wiLh a slope of 30 degrees or more shall require an
engineer design. Such design shall address drainage, soil retainage
and structural design.
Excavat.ion befow slabs on grade shaLl not be permitt.ed without prior
approval -
Address numbers shall be posted plainly visible and legible from the
street.
For ML occupancy
Slope garage floor to allow for drainage to outside to provide a
floor drain with sand and oil intercepLor Lo dry well or to sewer.
Any garage floor drain connect.ed to sewer must be approved by Upper
Eagle Valley water & Sanitation District.
In garages with living area above, the wal1s of the garage wiich are
bearing the area above shal1 be protected with one hour fire
resistive construction. UBC 503(B) .
, Town of Vail
25 South Fronfage Road
VaiI, Colorado 81657(303) 479-2L38
Plan analysis based on
the l-991 Uniform Building Code
ProjecL Number: 91493 Name: SAVOY VILLAS PHASE Bl-
Address: L100 N. FRONTAGE RD Date: SepLember 14, 1993
Contractor: BECK & ASSOC Occupancy: R3rM1
Architect: MORTER ARCH Type of const: V-N
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not inLended to be a complete
list.ing of all possible code requirements in the 1991 UBC. It is a guide to
selected sections of the code.
SEPARATION
DIRECTTON BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 50.0 Feet 50.0 Feet
EAST Building 0.0 Feet 0.0 Feet
SOUTH Propert.y line 20.0 Feet 20.0 Feet
WEST Propert,y line 25.0 Feet 25.0 Feet
EXTERTOR WALL FTRE RATTNGS AND OPENTNG PROTECTTON
Table l7-A & TabLe 5-A
.NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG
WALL WA]-,L PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL V4IALL PROT WALL WALL PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr None Lhr* l-hr* NOP Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
ML Ohr Ohr None thr* thr* NOP Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTIBLE material . Sec .220L.
None -- No fire protection requirements for openings.
Prot -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 ltr fire assembLies,
508 of Lhe area of the wall maximum. Sec.2203.(b) & Table 5-A
Maximum single window size is 84 sg.ft ruith no dimension
greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 4306- (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wall.* -- These walls may be required to have a parapeL wall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapeL wal] is required to have the sane
fire rating as Lhe wa1l. See section 1710. for deLails and exceptions.
Town of vaif
25 South Frontage Road
vail, Colorado 8L557(303) 479-2t38
PIan analysis based on
the 1991 Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 9L493 Nane: SAVOY VILLAS PHASE 82
Address: i. 100 N. FRONTAGE RD Date: September 16, l-993
Contractor: BECK & ASSOC Occupancy: R3rM1
Archit,ect: MORTER ARCH Type of Const: V-N
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete
listing of all possible code reguirements in the 1991 UBC. It is a guide to
seLected sections of the code.
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 45.0 Feet 45.0 Feet
EAST euilding 6.0 FeeL 3.0 Feet
SOUTH Property line 10.0 Feet. 10.0 Feet
WEST Building 0.0 r'eet. 0 . 0 Feet
EXTERIOR WALL F]RE RATTNGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table l?-A & Table 5-A
NORTH EAST SOU?H WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr 'None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Lhr* Lhr* NOP
Ml- Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Lhr* Lhr* NOP
The exterior wa11s may be of COMBUSTIBLE material . Sec .2201 .
None -- No fire protection requirements for openings.
Prot -* Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies.
50% of the area of the wall maximum. 5ec.2203.(b) & Table 5-A
Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft with no dimension
greater Lhan l-2 feet. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wall.* -; These walls may be required to have a parapet wall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet walI is reguired to have the same
fire rating as the wall. See section 1?L0. for details and exceptions.
Town of Vail
25 SouLh Frontage Roadvail, Col0rado B1-657(303) 479-2t38
Plan analysi-s based onthe 1991 Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 9L493 Name: SAVOY VILLAS PIIASE 83
Address : 1100 N. FRONTAGE RD Date: September 1-4, l'993
Contractor: BECK & ASSOC Occupancy: R3rM1
Archit.ect: MORTER ARCH Type of Const : V-N
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete
listing of aLl possible code reguirements in the 1991 UBC. It is a guide to
selected sections of the code.
SEPARATTON
DTRECTTON BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTTON
NORTH Property line 43.0 Feet 43.0 Feet
EAST Building 0.0 Feet 0 .0 Feet
SOUTH Property line 8.0 Feet 8.0 Feet
WEST Building 6.0 Feet 3.0 Feet
EXTERIOR WALL F]RE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 17-A & Table 5-A
NORfH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG
WALL WATT PROT WALL WALL PROT WAI,L WALL PROT WALL WALL PROf
R3 Ohr Ohr None Lhr* thr* NOP Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
M]- Ohr Ohr None l-hr* thr* NOP Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None
The exLerior walls may be of COMBUSTTBLE material . Sec .2201 .
None -- No fire prot.ection requirements for openings.
Prot -- openings are to be protecled viit.h 3/4 hx fire assemblies.
508 of the area of the wa11 maximum. Sec.2203-(b) & Table 5-A
Maximun single window size is 84 sq.ft with no dimensiongreater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NOP -- Openings are not permitted in this wall.* *- These walls rnay be required to have a parapet wal] 30 inclres
above the roofing. The parapet !va]l is required to have the same
fire rating as the wafl. See secLion 1710. for details and exceptions.
rt'
Town of Vail-
25 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657(303) 479-2L38
Plan analysis based on
the 1991 Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 91,493 Name: SAVOY VILLAS PHASE 84
Address: 1100 N. FRONTAGE RD Dat.e: Septenber 15, 1993
ConLracLor: BECK & ASSOC Occupancy: R3rM1
Architect: MORTER ARCH Type of Const: V-N
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL Plans Examiner: DAI'I STANEK
NOTE:The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete
listinq of all possible code requirements in the l-99f UBC. It. is a guide to
sefected sections of the code.
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA TNCREASE FTRE PROTECT]ON
NORTH Property line 39.0 Feet 39.0 Feet
EAST Building 6.0 Feet 3.0 Feet
SOUTE Property line 19.0 Feet 19.0 Feet
WEST Buildinq 0.0 Feel 0.0 FeeL
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RAT]NGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 17-A & Table 5-A
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
OCC BRG NON-BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON_BRG OPNG BRG NON-BRG OPNG
WALL WALL PROT WALL WAL1 PROT WALL WALL PROT WALL WALL PROT
R3 Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None thr* l-hr* NoP
M1 Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None Ohr Ohr None l-hr* thr* NoP
The exterior walls may be of COMBUSTIBLE material . Sec.22OI .
None -- No fire protection requiremenLs for openings.
Prot -- Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies.
50* of the area of the wall maximum. Sec.2203.(b) & Tab1e 5-A
Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft with no dimensionqreater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 4306. (h)
NoP -- openings are not permitted in this wall.* -- ?hese walls may be required to have a parapet wall 30 inches
above the roofing. The parapet wal1 is required Lo have the same
fire rating as the wall. See section l-71-0. for details and exceptions.
FL NAME AREA M]N.LTGHT MTN.VENT NO.EXITS EGRESS
1- Living & Dining room
L Kitchen1 Powder room
L GarageL Ha11s, closets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
B Master bedroom
B Master bath
B Bedroom #1B Bath roon #1B Bedroom #2B Bath room #2B Ha11s, closets, etc.
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
BUILDING gOTAL
FOOTNOTES:
418
L00
5Z
298
225
10 93
201
83
tro
38
120
??
236
831
r.0 93
41.80
r_0 - 00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
20.10
0.00
l.I. OU
0.00
rz.vv
0.00
0.00
20.90
5.00
2 .60
0 .00
0.00
L0.05
4 .15
5.6U
1.90
6.00
I . 6J
0.00
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
NO
Yes
No
Yes
NO
No
Yes
I
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
1
1
II
1
1
l.) EGRESS - An oPerable window or
is required fron this room. The
the following. -- Sec.l-204.
L) The minimum clear height is 24 inches
2) The minimum clear width is 20 inches
3) The minimum clear area is 5.? square
4) The maximum si1l height is 44 inches
The number of exits is based on Tab1e 33-a
A mechanical ventsil-ation system may be used
openings for ventilation. -- Sec. 1205. (c)
the requirement for an egress window in the
Sec. 1204 .
door that opens directly to Lhe exterior
minimum clear openable area must meet
feet
(Dwellings)
in in lieu of exterior
basement is based on
z)
3)
4)
ROOM DIMENSIONS:
Habitable space shall- have a ceiling height of not less than 7 feet 5
inches. Kitchens, halIs, bathrooms and toilet compartments may have a
ceiling height of 7 feet measured Lo the lowest projection. If the ceiling
is sloping, then the minimum height is required in onLy t/2 of the area.
--Sec. L20'7.(a)
Every dwetling unit shall have at least one room which has not less than L20
square feeL of floor area. Other habitable rooms except kitchens shall have
an area of not less than 70 square feet. -- Sec . L2A7 . bl
HabitabLe rooms other than a kitchen shaLl not be less than 7 feet in any
dimension. -- See - 120'1 . (e)
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS:
A11 glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety
glazing material . -- Sec. 5406. (d)
1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.
2) Glaeing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblj.es and
panels in swinging doors oLher than wardrobe doors.
3) Glazing in storm doors.
4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors.
Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools' saunas, steam
rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any porLion of a building wall
enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the
glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet,
Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest
exposed edge of the glazxing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical
edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge
of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface.
Glazing in an individua.l fixed or operable panel, other than those
IocaLions described in items 5 and 6 abover t.han meets all of t.he
following conditions:
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greaLer t.han 9 sguare feet.
B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor.
C. Elrposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the f1oor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 35 inches horizontally of the
plane of the glazing.
Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface.
lncluded are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in-fil-l-
panels.
SMOKE DETECTOR REOUIREMENTS :
A smoke detector is required on the ceilingi or wall at a point centrally
Iocated in the corridor or area giving access to each sleeping area.
-- sec. 1210. (a) 4.
A smoke detector is required on lhe ceiling or wa1l in each sleeping
area. -- Sec. l-2L0.(a) 4.
A smoke detector is required in the basement. -- Sec. 1210.(a) 4,
Srnoke detectors are requj.red to be wired to the building,ts poh'er source and
sha1l be eguipped with a battery backup. *- Sec. 1210.(a) 3-
Detectors shall sound an alarm audibLe in all sleeping area of the dwelling
in which they are located. -- Sec. 121-0. (a) 4.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION:
Between the garage and the residence, materials approved for thr fire
construction are required on the garage side only and any doors beLween
the garage and the residence are to be a sel-f-closing 1,3/8 inch sotid
core door or a 20 minuLe fire door. -- Table 5-B & Sec.503.(d) exc. #3
STAIR REQUIREMENTS:
A stairway in a dwelling must be at leasL 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 3306.(b)
The maximum rise of a step is 8 inches'and the minimum run is 9 inches.
-- sec. 3306. (c) exc. #L
Provide a handrail" on one side a stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if
there is 4 or rnore risers. -- Sec. 3306. (i)
Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater t,han 30 inches. Minimum height
= 36 inches, maximum opening size = 4 inches. -- Sec. 171-2.(a) exc. #1
The minirnum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. -- Sec. 3306.(o)
Enclosed usable space under the st.airs is required to.be protected as required
for Ltrr fire-resistive consLruction. -- Sec. 3305. (f)
ql
6)
7)
8)
SHAFT ENCLOSURES:1) Chutes and dumbwaiter shafts with a cross-sectional area of not more than
9 square feet may lined on the inside with not less than 26 gage
galvanized sheet metal with all joints locklapped. fhe outside must. be
I hr constructj-on. AII openings into any such enclosure shall be protected
by npt less than a self-closing solid wood door L 3/8 inches thick or
equivalent.. -- Sec. 1706. (f)
2) Gas vents and noncombustible piping inst.alled in walls passing through
3 floors or less do not need to be in l- hour shafts.
-- Sec. 1706- (c)
3) Shafts for gas ventsr factory-built chimneys, piping, or ducts that do
not extend through not more t!\an 2 floors need not be i-n t hour shafts.
-- Sec. 1706. (c)
4) All other shafts are required to be enclosed in a t hour assembly.
-- Sec. 1706. (a)
ADDITIONAL REOUIREMENTS :
For R3 occupancy
This project will require a site improvement survey. Such survey
shall be submitled and approved prior to request for frame
inspection.
A11 crawl spaces voithin the Town Of Vail are limited to a earth Lo
structural fl-oor ceiling height of 5', be earth floor onlyr be
ventilaLed as per UBC 251-6 (C) 6 with minimum access as per UBC
2516(C)2 and maximum access of 9 sq. ft.
Any building site with a slope of 30 degrees or more shall require an
engineer design. Such design shall address drainage, soil retainage
and structural design.
Excavation below slabs on grade sha1l not be permitted without prior
approval .
Address numbers shall be posted plainly visible and legible from the
streeL.
For Ml occupancy
Slope garage floor to allow for drainage to outside to provide a
floor drain with sand and oil interceptor to dry wefl or to sewer.
Any garage floor drain connected to sewer must be approved by Upper
EaEIe Valley water & Sanitation District.
rn garages with living area above, the waIls of the garage wiich are
bearing the area above sha1l be protecLed with one hour fire
resistive construction. UBC 503(B) .
Town of Vail
25 South Erontage RoadVai1, Colorado 81657(303) 479-21,38
PIan review based on
the l"99L Uniform Building Code
Project Number: 9L493
Address: 11OO N. FRONTAGE RD
Cont.ractor: BECK & ASSOC
ArChit.ecL: MORTER ARCH
Engineer: MONROE & NEWELL
SHEET IDENTIFICATION
NamE: SAVOY VILLAS PHASEDate: September L4, L993
Occupancy: R3rML
Type of Const: v-N
Plans Examiner: DAN STANEK
CORRECTION REQUIRED
A bathroom is required to have an openable window or
a mechanicaL ventilation systern. -- Sec. L205. (c)
fn bathrooms with a tub or shower and in laundry
rooms a mechanical venlilation system connected
directly to the outside shall be provided. Bathrms
which contain only a waLer closet. or lav. may be
ventilated with a recirculating fan. UBC 1205(c).
Domestic cfothes dryer exhausl ducts shall- be
instalfed as per UMC 1-l-04 and 1903. Flexible duct
connectors may not exceed 6t in Iength and shall not
be concealed within construction. Ducts shal1
terminate outside the buifding and not exceed t4'
length.
Cross connection control devices sha1l be installed
to protect pollution of potable water suppfy by use
of approved backflow prevention devices. UPC 1003.
Domestic ranges shall have a vertical clearance
above the cooking surface of not less than 30" to
unprotected combusti-bIe material. UMC 1901.
This exterior walI is required to be a thr fire
assembly. -- Table 5-A
Provide a parapet wall above the roofing on Lhis
waIl with the same fire rating as the wall-. -- Sec.
1710. (a)
This exterior wall- is required to be a thr fire
assenbly. -- Tab1e 5-A
l-0
1l_
Provide a parapet wa1l above the roofing on thiswall wiLh the same fire rating as the wall. -- Sec.
1?10. (a)
A bathroom is required to have an openable window or
a mechanical venLilation system. -- Sec. 1-205. (c)
In bathrooms with a tub or shower and in laundry
rooms a mechanical ventilation system connected
directly to the outside shal1 be provided. BaLhrms
which contai-n only a water closet or lav. may be
ventilated with a recircufating fan. UBC l-205(c).
Domestic clothes dryer exhaust ducts shall be
installed as per UMC 1104 and 1"903. Flexible duct
connectors may not exceed 6t in length and shall not
be concealed within consLruction. Ducts sha11
terminate outside the building and not exceed LAl
Iength.
Cross connection control devices shall be installed
to protect pollution of potable water supply by use
of approved backflolv prevention devices. UPC 1003.
Domestic ranges shall have a vertical clearance
above the cooki-ng surface of not. less than 30" Lo
unprotected combustible material . UMC 1901.
Heating and cooling equipnent located in the garage
sha11 be installed with the pilots and burners or
heating elements and switches at l-east 18" above the
floor level of the garage. UMC 508.
Furnaces not fisted for closet or alcove
installation shall be instafled in a room or space
having a volume at ]east 12 times the volume of the
furnace. A boiler unit will require a space 16
t.imes larger than the boiler. uMc 504(b)
Supply a mechanical drawing indicating design of
system, size (BTU and volume) of equipmentr vent
Location and terminationr and combustion air t.o be
supplied prior Lo any installation.
Gas piping shall noL be installed in or on the
ground under any building or st.ructure and exposed
gas piping shall be kept at least 6" above grade.
uMc 22L3 (b)
The garaEe must be separated from t.he dwell-ing by
Lhr fire-resistive construcLion on the garage side.
-- Tab1e 5-B & 503. (d) exc.#3
t2
13
1-4
l_5
L7
18
19
t
20
21
22
23
24
25
zb
The door between the garage and the dwel]ing is
required to be a I 3/8 inch thick solid core or 20
minute self closing door. -- Sec. 503. (d) exc.#3
The stair(s) indicated does not provide the required
minimum width of 36 inches. -- Sec, 3306" (b)
The maximum rise of a step is 8 inches and Lhe
minimum run is 9 inches. -- Sec. 3306. (c) exc #1
A handrail is reguired along a stairway. It is
required to be 34 to 38 inches above the nosing of
the steps and if the side is open, the maximum size
of an opening in the railing at the stairway is 4
inches. -- sec. 3306. (i) e 1712.
A 36 inch high guardrail with a maximum opening of 4
inches is requied vrhere step is greater Lhan 30
inches to floor or grade below. -- Sec. l'1L2.
The enclosed usable space under the stairs is
required to be protected by thr fire-resistive
construction. -- 3306. (1)
The open side of all decks, porches, stairs, etc.
which are more than 30" above grade shall beprotected with a guardrail. Openings can not exceed4". Within R-1 occ. and all R-3, height min. is
36"-outside R-1 occ. height. min. ts 42". UBC t7L1".
At eaves and valleys an adequate underl-ayment shal-I
be provided to protect a structure from ice buildup
and water damage. T!,ro layers of felt solid mopped
to sheathing and between layers or a cornmercial
water & ice shiefd may be used as per Tab1e 3281.
A one-line electrical drawing for each level is
reguired for this project. Failure to provide such
rnay result in field corrections at the expense of
contractor.
lnclude a copy of the soi-Is report for the site to
be built on. -- Sec. 2905.
2't
28
/.t
otgn -xevrew Acuon ror(l
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Numbef
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner. Address and Phone:
, -.i:---..,- ,
, Architesvcontdll)Rddress and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot _ Block_ Subdivision Zone District 'i-\-h
ProjectStreetAaaress: l,'i?O tri,,t'4 ,{-',,.i'n?z f .!
Board / Staff Action
Motionby: A'v.,l/f Vote: I'O -
Secondedby:'l(.rrt-.--a
! Rpprovatt\
D Disapproval
a Staff Approval
Conditions:
Town Planner
Date: i/'3'73 DRB Fee Pre-paid
(
(PIease
NAME OF
Print or
PROJECT
NAME oF pERSoN suBMrrrrNc c.ulylthrunzfd{ enoxn t0{
ADDRESS
NAME OF
ADDRESS
SIG}IATT'RE
I,OCATION OF
DESCRIPTION
PHONE-
OE' OIINER
PROJECT
OF PROJECT
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REOUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL BY TIIE
APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BE]NG SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD.
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGN/AWNING
PROJECTING, ETC), INCLUDE SIGN
(FREE STANDING, WALI,,
MESSAGE.
I
APPLrcArro* oatffo D gglAilg9x-
SIGN /AWNING APPLI CATION
Type) r r-{ Av nv V tl-t*S'
SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL
SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN,
5/orr t +l. ot'
SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO
D. HEIGHT OF
ll. ullDurllDlJ
S]GN ABOVE GRADE
LIGHTING (EXISTING oR PRoPosnol ,AfilV'
F.
l{
LENGTH OF BUSINESS FRONTAGE (TT)
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL
FEE: $2O.OA PLUS $1.00 PER SQUARE FOOT OF 5I
eerc fr?044 cHEcK No. ,2.{31 DArFr
REOUIRED MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
1. v Site Plan
-
2. / ELevations showing exacL location of sign or
awning on the building
3.
-
Phrotographs showing proposed location
4.
-
Colored scale drawing
(ATTACH)
Sample of proposed materlals
Photograph of sign if available
q
6.
-
ovtR
Siqn A&rinistrator
i)t i
TO: SIGN APPLICANTS
When applications for signs are submitted, the following
informat,ion is required:
L. A conpleted sign/awning application (attached) .
2. A site plan showing the e{4ct location where the sign
is to be Located.
3. A photograph if possible and building elevation showingthe localion of the proposed sign.
4. A scaled drawing which details the design of the sign'as follows:
(a) Cotored exact,ly as sign will be.(b) A list of materials to be used in sign (metal,
wood, canvas, paint, etc. )(c) Photograph of sign if available.(d) Specific lettering style and size.
5. ff an awning is proposed, subnit drawings showingexactly how and where the awning is at-tached to the
building and how the awning is to be constructed.
6. Description of lightinq that will be used inconjunction with the sign or awning. If proposlng an
awning, lj-ghting is not allowed to shine t.hrough Lhe
entire awning which calls undue attention to thebusiness. Lighting may spotlight only t.he aictual sign
lettering on the ar+ning.
RECOM}4ENDATIONS OR POINTERS
1. Check sign code : verify site, height etc.2. Be specific. Vagueness on design, size, constructJ-on naydelay the approval of your sign.3, Measure frontage of business.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REQUIRED A? THE TTME OF APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL.
If this application requires a separaLe review by any local,State or Federal agency other than the Town of Vail, theapplication fee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of suchreview, may include, but are noL limited to: Colorado Department.of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shalI be responsible for paying any publishing feeswhich are in excess of 50% of the application fee. ff, at theapplicant's requestr dny matter is postponed for hearing, causingthe matter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publicalion shall be paid by Lhe applicant.
Applications deemed hry the Community Development Department tohave significant des.ign, land use or other issues which may havea significant impact on the communily may require review byconsultants other t.hat town staff. Should a determination be
made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed Loreview any application, Community DevelopmenL may hire an outsideconsuLtant., it shall estimate the amounl of tnoney necessary Lopay him or her and this amounL shall be forwarded to the Town bythe applicant at. the time he files his application with the
comrnunity Development Department. upon compretion of the reviewof t.he application by the consult,anl, any of the funds forwardedby t.he applicant for payment of the consul"t;rnt which have notbeen paid to the consultant sha]l be returned to the applicant.Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of r he amounL forwardedby tfe applicant shall be paid to Lhe Town by the applicantwithin 30 days of notification by the Town.
rw
r.i,-il).tl
t\,
l
I
--1- -/y,ou;'o
U
o
\c
C\
n
o L-/
_/
4.'\,t7-
erLa:
,a
to+ D
ao
v
{
$'_
fr{i\3\
NoLr
d9Ll
+\f+
-F -!lnflrd
I
Tq
-1
PLEASE I,IAKE
TO}VN OF VAIL
D E PA R T;\1 Ex.. T O F C O lvl ;!1 LiN ITY D EV EL O P II EN T'
S,ILES ACT]ON FOR}{
SOUTH FR.ONTAGE ROAD
81657
N,l.\tE
zc\T\ c .c'r\D .{ DDRESS !'lA}S0t c{0041J10
0l uE3C42415 LrrrIJICL\{ BUILDL\*G CODE
UMFOR.\,I PLUIGN\G CODE0l o)00 {21i5
0l c&?042.ilJ I UMFOp-u l\iEcH,L\lc,1.LcoDE
0r orsl rl{ 15 | uNlFotu\{ EIXj coDE
N.UIONiL ELECTPJCAL CODE0 | 0000 { 2.1 l5
0l 0000 {21,5 I oTtiER coDE;OOXS
BLUE PRPTTS fIIYL;ils0t o,1]o.{1543
0r olc"l r21 I 2 | ):;:Rox coPES / s'iuDiEs
PINA t-TY FEE5 / R E. r.'.*5 PECI-]ONS0t occ{ 12371
0l C4!10 .t I l-i2 PL,L\ REV]5V RE.CIJECK FEE [S-(1] FER, IiR.]
0t t€'00 42323 oFF HOURS I}is?[CllO].I FEES
CONTjl.lCTO RS LICL\SES FLES0t 0co3;l{r2
Lr t ittK rrrJ
SIGN APPL]CA]IOi{ FEE111t3
ADDJTION,I IJ sI6NAOE i;E tS I .OJ ?8.R, SQ.IT.
0l e$,c.r2.i{0 lTC ART PF,OJF.CT DONA]]ON
0t c\}]o'lt33l PRE I?NJD DESICM.qEI'IE1V BOAF,D FEE
OIOOOO424I2 I BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COI'IPUTER D
*.01 0000 41010 T,rx
01 0000 4237t rNvEsrrGATroN FEE (BUTLDTNG) I 'TOTOL
ouu,
0l cEA) r 1330
0l 0]30 1 1330
0t 0030,rt3i0 R ALITR.'I]ION IIIORE TH,r.,"{ tC'3 SO.F|.
0l o})0.rt330
CT tl'ft\'OR. A,:\:L\D0l 0F3.?!r3i0 ' rSPECLALD
0l 01100413
{ IJ3O ; VAFJ,ANC
0l cs90{1330 tzoNlhrc coDE,r"va'
0l 00c\)41330
*'*
*
*
*
*
*
tk
,ort "'"' ! ':
R"ECEIPT- .lclhrClfil
/ ,,', ,F;
1A . ./Ns 45325
RECEIVED FROM
ADDRESS
Permit Numbers
HDW PAID*Cash-Check - -
tnY-'
-E"CFlr"ilru r,r-iF :,'iF* SA*_
I'ii;r+l I -rr;=,:u= Llgsi-;
t:i!:'i:r' ir'rr::
:'ii i:ii:
Fniuun'r p=i 'i
t : nii.
l-+-i;:li'{}i a.r{JLl
'n
f I
F
Department of Community Development75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-21 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
September 13, 1993
Mr. Andy Beck
Beck and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 4030
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Town of Vail Building Permft Application - Phase l, Savoy Villas (1100 North Frontage
Road)
Dear Andy:
The Town of Vail Planning Department has reviewed your building permit application for the
above-menlioned project and has approved the application with the following conditions:
1. That a minimum clearance of 8' - 0" be provided along the berm lo the south ol
Lionsridge Loop Road for Town of Vail snow storage and drainage, unless
approved otherwise by the Town of Vail Engineer.
2. That the maximum height of retaining walls for this project be as noted on the
approved construction documents, with the provision that no wall be any higher
than 6'- 0".
3. That the trash facility, proposed to be located on the western portion of this site,
be provided as a part ol this Phase I construction.
4. That the maximum roof elevations, to be verified by an lmprovement Location
Certificate at the time of framing, shall be as follows:
a. Unit A-1/B-1 = Elevation 8145
b. Unit A-2lB-2 = Elevation 8150
c. Unit A-3/B-3 = Elevation 8150
d. Unit A-4lB-4 = Elevation 8154
5. That any project sign or signs shall need a separate Design Review Board
(DRB) approval prior to installation on this site. A sign application may be
obtained from the Oftice of Community Development.
,a
T
Mr. Beck
September 13, 1993
Page Two
6. That all new landscaping, to be associated with this Phase I construction, shall
consist of the plantings designated within the sarne boundaries as the Phase I
"limits of site disturbance", as indicated on Sheet No. A1.2.
Prior to the Town's issuance of any Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for this Phase I
construction, the following must be completed:
1. The removal of the viewing platform.
2. The developer shall grant the Town of Vail a drainage easement through the
property, to provide for the existing drainage flow which currently eniers the site
between the proposed ernployee housing building and the eastern condominium
building on the upper bench.
3. The developer shall provide a bike path easement for any portion of the
relocated Town of Vail bike path which shall be located upon the developer's
property.
Should the developer propose any changes or modifications to the Town of Vail approved
construction documents, please contact the Town of Vail Building Department and receive all
required approvals prior to the construction and/or installation of said modifications.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding any of the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,h''" fr'e*-| ,44
Mike Mollica
Assistant Director of Planning
xc: Sally Brainerd, Morter Architects
Gary Murain
Dan Stanek
Greg Hall
|'
l1a
.1:
'::.':)..
','.)...1:\;.
Lisa M, Dillon
P!6id.nr/chicf Erecud!. Offic.!
TRREVOCABLE I-JEITER OF CREDIT
Date:
Amount:
Number:Expiration: December 31, 1993
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road Westvail, co 8L657
Attention: Mr. Mike Mollica
Gentlemen:
We hereby open our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in your favoravailable by your drafts drawn on the Vail National Bank, 108 South
Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado 8L657, at sight for any sum not
exceeding the total of Twenty-four Thousand One Hundred Seventy-five and no/100 Dollars ($24,175,00) on the account of Besk andAssociates, fnc.
Each draft nust bear upon its face tlre clause, rrDrawn Under Letterof Credit No. l-36, dated August t-2, 1993". The draft shall be
signed by the Vail Town Manager.
The amount of each draft, which is negotiated pursuant to thiscredit, together with the date of negotiation, must be endorsed onthe reverse side of this Letter of Credit.
We hereby agree that drafts drawn under this Letter of Credit, andin compliance with the terms, shall be pronptly honored ifnresented to VaiL National Bank on or before December 31, L993.
Sincerely, ^ \
-/), AA /\du/ll L't4/al\-
L,/sa M. Dillon
President/CEO
I es"- # vs)^k K^''fu'"tr)
VAILNATIONALBANK ry
U
August 1-2, 1"993
$24, 175. 0o
136
Vail National Bank Building 108South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 8165? 303/4?6-4600 FAX 303/4?6-?666
lFffikd;;Kilr
August 5, 1993
Mr. Mike Mollica
Town Plannen
Department of Community Dwelopment
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81658
Dear Mike:
Attached a^re a rccent Topographical Survey, proposed Sit€ Plan, an Estimate for returning the
use of the Savoy Villas sit€ (Simba Run vacant loQ. Please call me when you
this soare may mutually formulate an acceplable agreement.
President
Beck and Associates, Inc.
/srh
G grsrirt,t{.. a$ruTfi 6cTofl:i
r{o.6()x 4ri.trt
YAIL, COLORACTo tJ1$58
.:o:l.j ilj9. t lloir
BECK At{D ASSOCIATES, INC.
PROK)SED USE AND TIMING PLAN
Beck and Associates is currently exporting roc*s and shustural fill from the Garftrer Residence
site, Lot 3, Block l, Lions Ridge Subdivision, 4th Filing, 1179 Red Sandstone Drive. We
projet we will move approximately 2,00G2,200 yards of matedal to the Savoy Villas site. The
sutplus rocls generated ftom the Garurer site a.re being exported to the Cortina Chalets site in
West Vail. The rocls and sEuctural fill will be used at the Savoy Villas site to accomplish the
Foposed boulder retaining walls and landscaped b€rrns of the proiect.
Villas does not haul off the
establish mix
in 30 !o set the Villas
guarant€c this will haprpen, I will an letter of credit and/o'r
a bond acce,ptable to the Town. [f the approval proc€$s is delayed past Octob€r 30, 1993, the
Town Staff and Beck and Associates will agree !o a specific time table and arrangemurt that
deals with wintertime conditions or springtime removal of the material. In any event, the letter
of aedit/performance bond will rcmain in place until such time as the re-organization of the siie
is complete.
/srtt .M*td #a &_ F
, F/'e -I. I - Yro r u,f:,r',.*-/ / O* dh g'6'?3
BECK AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
ESTIMATE
Load, Haul, urd Dump
2,000 yards of fill @$7.00/yard
Load, Haul, and Dump
10 truckloads of rocks @$150.00/yard
Re-grade Site
8 hours @$120.00/hour
Re-vegetate Site
A,W square feet @$.|Zlsquare fmt
TOTAL
$14,000.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 960.00
$ 2,880.00
$19"3{0,S
x 125 ?e
# 24, tzs'L'
@.'a'"'\
srl.F flmFqf
3.A request for a variance to allow a satellite dish to exceed the height limitations to be
located at the Vail Valley Medical Center/1 8.1 West Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail
Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center represented by Dan Feeney
Planner: Jim Curnutte
Jim Curnutte presented the request per the staff memo.
Dalton Williams made a motion to approve this request for a variance to allow a
satellile dish to exceed the height limitations per the slaff memo with Jeff Bowen
seconding the motion.
Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see future additions of this type painted
black instead of brown.
A 7-0 vote approved this request with fhe two conditions specified in the staff memo.
A requesl for a minor amendmenl to $DD #5, Simba Run (Savoy Villas)/An unplatted
parcel located at 1100 North Frontage Road.
Applicant: Simba Land CorporationMalid SaidPlanner: Mike Mollica
Kathy Langenwalter $tated that the PEC did not have a problem with the minor change
in the building heights.
Dalton Williamsr made a motion to approve the request for a minor amendment to SDD
#5, Simba Run (Savoy Villas), specifically the minor changes in the buildings height, of
the Phase I and Phase ll buildings per the statf memo with Jeff Bowen seconding this
request. A 7-0 vote approved this request.
A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road EasVan unplatted parcel located between VailVillage 7th Filing
and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
Applicant: VailValleyMedicalCenter
Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO DECEMBER 13, 1993
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this request until December 13, 1993 with Dalton
Williams seconding this motion. A 7-0 vote tabled this item until December 13, 1993.
Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes
November 22. 1993
A
5.
rILil
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development
November ?2,1993
A request for a minor amendment to SDD No. 5, Simba Run (Savoy
Villas)/An unplatted parcel located at 1100 North Frontage Road.
Applicant: Simba Land CorporationMalid SaidPlanner: Mike Mollica
ilfrlY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUEST
The Simba Land Corporation, developer of the Savoy Villas project, located in Development
Area B of Special Development District No.5 (SDD No. 5), has requested a minor SDD
amendment in order to modily the approved development plan. The minor modification
involves the approved buitding heights for the Phase I and Phase ll condominiums, located on
the upper bench of the development adjacent to Lionsridge Loop Road. The applicant has
stated that "in order io accommodate the rockfall protection berm on the north side of this site,
final regrading requirements of the driveway had to be changed to,allow the western driveway
access to slide all the way to the west property line.'l This has resulted in a minor change to
the building heights as follows:
Building A Western Half:
Building A Eastern Half:
Increase in height of 2.5 feet
No change in height
Building B Western Half:
Building B Eastern Half:
No change in height
Decrease in height of 2.5 feet
Building C Western Half:
Euilding C Eastern Half:
No change in height
Decrease in height of 2.5 feet
Building D Western Half:
Building D Eastern Half:
Decrease in height of 1.5 feet
Decrease in height of 1.0 feet
Please see the attached site plan for the locations of the above described buildings.
J
II. AMENDMENT PROC"EDURES
Section 18.40.100 (,,4mendment Procedures) of the Town of VailMunicipal Code stipulates the
following for minor amendments to Special Development Districts:
'Minor amendments: lv{inor modifications consistent with the design cri{eria
outlined in Section 18.40.0208 (attached) may be approved by the Department
of Community Development. All minor modifications shall be indicated on a
completely revised development plan. Approved changes shall be noted,
signed, dated and filed by the Department of Community Development."
In addition, the Municipal Code also stipulates that the Community Development staff shall
inforn the PEC of the staff action on the reouest lor a minor SDD amendment.
ilr. STAFF AgTtON
The Community Development Department staff believes that the proposed modification to the
building heights for Phases I and ll of Savoy Villas, as described above, would be consistent
r,vith the design criteria outlined in Section 18.40.0208 (attached), and has approved the
applicant's requ€st to modify the above described building heights. The slaff does not believe
that the applicant's request would alter the intent of the SDD, nor would it have any negative
impacts upon any of the adjacent property owners.
'l:\pechemgs'6avoy1 1.22
ar
Io.. &
ili
iii
lii,
sp(^rlItt
{/|
f I I
l,{
/H
tf
I
I
I
I
F
.1
{.1+s
41
lj
IA:$
I
"9 ft\.i
qp
TF
'o tlF:aDJ-zs\
SavoY Villas
SFdd On*F { d'r'td
vrll. Colorttto
.{
J'\, ,
ZONINO
,t' "' '.i '
l*Minor amcndn:cnt (Staff revicw)" sball mcan modifi-lmdscapcplansthatdo
ndt altcr rhc basii intent and cbaractcr of thc approvcd
soecial dcvclopmcut district, ald arc consisrcnt with thc
dcsian critcrij of this chaptcr- l'{inor arqcndmclts IDay
inclrJdc, but not bc'linited ro, variatlons cf ao! morc
than five fect to approvcC sctbacks and/or building
footprinrs; changcs ro iaadscapc oi'sitc plans thzt do not
advcrscly impair pcdcstrian or vchiculzr circulation
rhroughout thc special devclopncnt disrrict: or cbangcs '
to gtJts floor arta (cxcluding icsidential uscs), of nbt'
moie tbai, lil'c pcrccat of thc asprovcd squatc fcotagc of
rctail, oificc, iommon arcas aod othcr nonrcsidantial
\{ajor escndrrcnt (PEC endi or courcil. rcvicv)";i#il
m\ any proposal !o ch an3,c uscs; incica-yy'€ross
r.s;O.r-lisi. noor area; changc tb: rurabcr o'i I'dcliing ot
arncndmenrs a-s dtRecC in Scctiot 18fr'02C8')
D. "UnCcrlying zonc dhgt" sb can tbc aone d istrict
eristiag on the proPcnY;
-poscd on thc ProPertY at
accoinmotxjon unirs; moriity cniargc o9ttcxpand any
app ro ved s p"ba{ dcve lop mc n r d is r ricr J-ottrc r. t h a n ninor
thc rir.,rl rhc spccial icvc!oyxfenqdistn'ct is approvcd'
E. " A f fc c t c d p r o p. n y " s |;r-{* c a o}"qp t ty. .1i l
hjl lj t ::'-1dcvelopmcnt aisrii.li,rt!.t, by vinu\ its proxirnity or
relarionship to {proposed arocndme}\rcqucst. to a3
approvcd dcycfopncrt plan, naY bc tcd by rc-
aciign, dgr$ty -iccrcasc, cbal5c in u.scs,\ olhcr
mociificgti6ns changing thc inpacts, or charactc{ thc
apprSr{ea spcciaJ Cevclopmcat disrrict.
(ord.,3{(1988) $ l.)
(vr;t l2-39-89)
re qu i rc rn e n tf*Ei:i::-*llgdg@
ri ons a nd--al-l-'orfi?I requirc rncrTs
ESocietioo's dcclara-
uF+he--cor:dominiura
floor arca.
382-10
Re:
':tr4
re,Y
Mike Mollica
Town of Vail Community Development
Savoy Villas
S.D.D. Minor Amendment Application
Mike;November 17, 1993
This amendment application is for the alteration of the building heights on the
approved development plan. The final grading requirements of the driveway had to
be changed to allow the western driveway access to slide all the way to the west
property line. This was done to accommodate the rockfall protection berm on the
north side of the site, In turn, some of the building heights had to be altered.
As indicated on the revised site plan, the western half of the western-most building
is to be raised 2'6". All other portions of every building are to be lowered or stay the
same.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
Sally Br"ainerd
't i {
t..
a
sevised LO|S/92
t
. !ffi$l':irj
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED
1 5 1995,
or{NER(S}
STGNATORE(Sl
E" A TTTLE REPORT
'Four, (4) egpi,es, of thet'rfd}Iowing
"*a4
D.
.a
ADDRESS 1100 North Frontage Rd. r Vail, C0 81657
PHoNns,9993__
AIt PROPERTY ADJACENT TO TIHE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT.ID ALIST OF
T TO I/ERIEY OITNERSHIP AND EASEMENTS.
ntnd'tnt:f6llowi5r'g- +nf6:rf ?gion 'nusi be
shall be subrnitted tozoning adninistrator in accot'dance with ChapterX8.56 hereof unless waived by Section 18.56.030; exempt,proJects;, ,' ngt^A:**. Dz , {?J614-.An open space andrrecreat,Lonal plaii sufficient to meet,
#'
the demands generated by the devele!1ment, hrithout undue. burden on.available or proposed public. facitities;
,,.Existing contourcontours having contour intervals gf not,. norethan five feet,if the'average slope of the.site-is
sribnit,tea:--' .
:
. A..',:,=r.Det ai].ed" wrlt,ten/graphic desciibeion of.' p;phic descfiption of.' proposbl;
B. An
t,e-Ldrre(r wrrc,E,enT grapnr: qesctrpEron oI. pr.op':
An environmental .irnpact report shall be subnthe zoninq administlator lir accordanr:e wirh
c.'
CHECKS
TOIVN OF VAIL
D E PA RTi\{E}iT O F CO }I}ILIJ,{ITY DEVELO P }TENT'
S.\LES ACTION TORI{. /5 souTH FRoNTAGE RoAD
, C0L0RADO B1657
N,\IlD
zc\T\G ..r.\D ADDR-ESS l,tAls0l 000041510
0l co3c 424 rJ LTVN:O R.\T B UILDL\G CODE
0t 0000r2415 UMFOR*\{ PLU}'1E L\*O CODE
0l 000042.t15 I UMFoR-\t;\GcH$"lcr.LcoDE
0r 000012{l5 I UNIFoR\{ FIRECoDE
0t *'n0o{24tj lt,rnot+,rlEtEcTp-rcAlcoDE I | .s;o.oo
OT.IER CODE BOOKS0l cs00 {24 }5
E LUE PRD{TS GIYL;,TtS0l 0000 { 1J43
0t 0.rol{2412 | >:erox ccPEs/s'iuDGs
0l 00c{123?l PENAI.TY FEES i R:.1.,-SPECl,1ONS
0l 0fc0.{ I -132 | PL,!.{ F.EVIFi{ RE.CIJECX FLE lS.{0 FER }iR.l
0l coco 42321 OFF,{OURS D{S PECTION FEES
C ONTii.\ CTO RS LIC Lr''S gS F:EES0r 000041{t2
0l c{00 i r 330 | oT}iER F-EES
sICN APPLIC,\'JION FEE.01 000041111
0t 0000{l{13 ADDITION,i',5ICNAGE i;E ISI.OO PE.R, SO.IT.
0t c00c12.:{0 lvlcentpnoiEcTDoNAltoN
PRE PffD DFJIcN RE\']EW DOARD F:E
AISOC[ItrZ412 I BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PERMIT COI'IPUTER DI
*.01 0000 41010 rAX (4I
0i 0000 42371 TNVESTTGATToN FEE (BUTLDTNG) I 'TOrA"
our,
0l00a1rll30 ONAL USE PEL\{IT
I CocE413
00c0 { } 330 oR, AL'ITR.{ION tfiORg Ti{i-.}r 100 so.Ff
0t 0000 .r I
0000 { l3i0
0l00cndl3i0 TSPEctALDEVEL OR A}{EAD
0t 0000 4t3
ai
l.'-----
N9 45 ?8
RECETVED FROM
ADDRESS
Permit Numbers ==-=--
-.d*-
+-_
rnw FAID- cash-che r{ :,i-/' 7--}
Police
$\\fi\
T{f rrrr-{ ctF LrR r L_
l,li=;el I aneous Cash
i.:l ':jf 16: il:.14
F;r,,':*i t, i- +i i :..--.i.;;
Frgc;*rft1. ti ,-.r; ,i ;,:;i
I,llrFtTEFi FiF;t:ri i ;[i;t-!t, _i] ..,r-.,! r..i:: LLF:1.:r;i:i ::i:i
Rr[t]Un ! t-rlnrir: I r,--i ::. :ir]El , ;i*
Item paid f,n*urr-i' p.:id
t:rl6BElff41if,1B[te ;i*. i::,
tlh.:nge re t.u rn,]d .. l. nt:1
]-HFTF'{}{ V{fTJ
Y*ur- tr.:Ehiqr F.:EffTl-lR
I
,t r llln lq3 cLclr'rr
WvtEvp llolnq
List of Neighboring Properties
SAVOY VILLAS
1. Simba Run Resort
Simba Run Owner's Association
c/o Don Hancock
1100 North Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
2. Timber Ridge Apartments
Mark lV Realty
400 North Franklin
Chicago, lL 60640
3. Vail Run Resort
Vail Run Ownership Association
1000 Lionsridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
4. Telemark Townhouses
Marika Brofus, president
Telemark Townhouses Association
1083 Lionsridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
5. Casolar
Greg Hampton, President .
1175-B Casolar Del Norte Drive
Vail, CO 81657
||r
6. Snow Fox Condominiums
Snow Fox Owner's Association
c/o Crossroads Realty
Box 1292
Vail, CO 81658
7. Breakaway West
Breakaway West Association
Box 5940
Avon, CO 81620
8. Colorado Department of Transportation
Box 298
Eagle, CO 81631
9. Lot G4, Lionsridge Filing 2
l,
Stewart H. Brown
Box 2359
Vail, CO 81658
' f'.,
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
November22, 1993
AGENDA
12:00 a.m.Proiect Orientation/Lunch
Site Visits 12:30 p.m.
Vail Valley Medicat Center
Leo Payne
Gotthelf's
Drivers: Jim and Andy
2:00 p.m.Public Hearinq
. 1. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow a bay window expansion of
Gotthelf'si196 Gore Creek Drive/Lots A, B, C, Block 5-C, VailVillage 1st Filing.
Applicant: PaulGotthelfPlanner: Jim Curnutte
2. A request for a minor subdivision and a rezoning lrom the PrimaryiSecondary
Residential zone district, to the PrimarylSecondary Residential and Single Family zone
districts, for a parcel located at 381 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd
Filing.
Applicant: Leo PaynePlanner: Jim Curnutte
3. A request for a variance to allow a satellite dish to exceed the height limitations to be
located at the Vail Valley Medical Center/181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E & F, Vail
Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: VailValley Medical Center represented by Dan Feeney
Planner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a minor amendment to SDD #5, Simba Flun (Savoy Villas)/An unplatted
parcel located at 1100 North Frontage Fload.
Applicant: Simba Land CorporationMalid SaidPlanner: Mike Mollica
5. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at
580 S. Frontage Road EasUan unplatted parcel located between VailVillage 7th Filing
and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way.
Applicant: VailValleyMedicalCenter
Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO DECEMBEB 13, 1993
6. A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved
exterior alteration proposal for the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeUPart of Lots B and
C, Block 5, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Appticant: Rod and Beth SliferPlanner: Kristan Pritz TABLED TO DECEMBEF 13,1993
7, A request for a site coverage variance to allow the construction of a new garage and
the conversion of an existing garage to an employee housing unit located at 1045
Homestake Circleilot 3, Block 1, VailValley Filing 1.
Applicant: Rod and Beth Slifer
Planner: Andy Knudtsen/Mike Mollica TABLED INDEFINITELY
L Update on bay window policy.
S. Approve minutes from November 8, 1993 PEC meeting.
10. Council Update:
.Open Lands Plan
o-
,ta\
Project Application
Date ?. 2. 73
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:?1? - rroa,I
I
.l
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Com ments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVA L DISAPRROVAL
Sum mary:
Town Planner
Oate:7'2.73
Stalf Approval
)t ^
-
r
WPnffirsfrt
,' ll :
1/ {Pl '
'frta 84.((t- t. s r;l
,hlr i4z- A t/t a,t;,t4
'n '6a L:tlt-aj) t'',1/
L'F- {*.ara,
frr*ru
//,; r:nt u14.
//6tt-ct( 4
.t /*,'"
2111 N. FRONTAGE ROAD W
vAll- coLoRADo 81657
(303) 476-0440
(303) 479-0791 FAx
l:l , i.;/ tl L-L-
./'7
4_. -A-)it.--l\
y')t c rz<,( t=5
,/i4t-r-';-<,'7
,r2*r, rs€- A-
C *ti ,r''l t- t nt -/ 4---
'fi.'74r i,
,hDY'
.UGth
Project Application
Date 7./Y,7i
Project
Project
Contact
N ame:
Description:
Person and
Arch ilect. Address and Phone:4?b^ 5ro s
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
Filing Zone
-
Design Review Board
@ D;t Ru+,^,1
Date
Motion by:
Seconded
b,,.,...n
T,n--o^byl
DISAPPROVAL
/ L.tt ,qru-:
Town Plan ner
Y./7 7jDate:
fl statt Approval
o
t.rf'?i 5H^ R."--, - F->4 7(-e--;er^'
o
-= ).aB
-T"' -
An enhancement to 0ur ever-popular
Mushroom series, lhese cast aluminum
luminaires are available in varying sizes
and heights and provide a wide range of
lighting patterns.
(st r -G
-\-lrT
v.n , q3 7;r.*- Crt^"4
ORDINANCE NO.18
Sedes of 1993
2,!! R
AN ORDINANCE REPEAUNG AND REENACTING ORDTNANCE NO. 29, SERIES OF 1977,
ORDINANCE NO. 33, SERTES OF 1978, AND ORDINANCE NO.24, SERIES OF 1986; AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING sPEctAL DEvELopMENT DlsrRtcr No. s AND pRovrDtiic
FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ITS CONTENTS; PERMITTED, CONDITIONAL ANDACCESSORY USES; DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, RECREATTON AMENITIeS rnX, ntrtOOTHER SPEC]AL PROVISIoNS; AND SETTING FoRTH DETAILS IN REGARD THEdETo.
WHEREAS, Chapter 18.2CI of tlre Vail Municipat Code authorizes speciat dwelopment
districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and
WHEREAS, an application has been made for the amendment of Special Development
Distfict (SDD) No. 5 for a certain parcel of property within the Town, tegatty described in the
attached Exhibit A, and commonly referred to as the simba RunA/ail Run special
Development District; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Enyironmental
commission, on July 26, 1999, held a public hearing on the amended sDD, and has
submitted its recornmendation to the Town Councit; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by section 1s.66.090 have been sent to the
appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Town councilconsiders that it is reasonable, appropriate, and
beneficial lo the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to amend sDD No. 5; and
WHEREAS, application has been made to the Town of vail to modify and amend
certain sections of Special Development District No. 5, which relate to Development Area B,
and which make certain changes in the development plan for Special Der/ehpment Distdct
No. 5 as they specifically relate to Development Area B; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66
of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vait.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDATNEO BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Town Council finds that afl tre procedures sel forth for Special Development
Districls in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code ol the Town of Vail have been fully satistied.
SECTION 2 - Purposes.
Special Development Distdct No. 5 is established to ensure comprehensive
I
t_
Ordnanc€ No. 16, S.ries ol tEott
a
I
acres
development and use of an area in a manner that witl be harmonious with the general
character of the Town, provide adequate open space and recreational amenities, and promote
the obiectives of the Zoning odinance. The development is rcgarded as compleme,ntary to
the Town by the Town Council and the Planning and Environmental Cornmission, and there
are significant aspects of the special development which cannot be satisfied through the
imposition ol siandard zoning districts on the area.
SECTION 3 - Special Development District No.5 Estabtished.
(A) Special Development District No. 5 is established for the development on a
parcel of land compdsing 8.84 acres in the Lionsddge area of the Town; Special Development
Districl No. 5 and said 8.84 acres may be refered to as "SDD No. 5".
(B) The existing building (Vail Run) consisting of 55 dwelling units, approximately
18,000 square feet of commercial space, a swimming pool and three tennis courts, shall be
known as Development Area A. The remainder of the property containing approximately 6.3
shall be described as Development Area B (Simba Run and Savoy Villas).
SECTION 4 - Approval of the Development Plan Required Prior to Development.
(A) Belore the developer commences site preparation, building construction, or
other improvement of open space within SDD No. 5, ftere shall be an Approved Development
Plan for said district.
(B) The proposed development plan for SDD No. 5, in accordance with Section 4
hereof, shall be submitted by the developer to the Zoning Administrator who shall refer it to
the Planning and Environmental Commission, which shall consider the plan at a regularly
scheduled meeting, and a report of the Planning and Environmental Commission stating its
findings and recommendations shall be transmitted io the Town Council in accordance with
the applicable prwisions of Section 18.66 of the Municipal Code.
(C) The Approved Development Plan shall be used as the principal guide for all
development within SDD No. 5.
(D) Amendments to the Approved Development Plan whicfr do not change its
substance and which are fully recommended in a report of the Planning and Environmental
Commission may be approved by he Town Council by Resolution.
(E) Each phase of the development shall require the prior approval of the Design
2
Ordnance No. 16, S.n€s of 1903
Review Board in aceordance wih the applicable provisions of Chapter 18.54 ol the Municipal
Code.
' SECTION 5 - Content of Proposed Development Plan.
The Proposed Developrnent Plan shall include, but is not limited to the following data:
(A) The Environrnental lmpac{ Report which shall be submitted to the Zoning
Administrator in accordance with Chapter 18.56 hereof.
(B) An open space and recreational plan sufficient to meet the demafids generated
by the development without undue burden on available or proposed public facilities.
(C) Existing and proposed contours after grading and site dwelopment having
contour intervals of not more than two (2) feet.
(D) A proposed site plan, at a scale not smaller than I inch = 20 feet, showing the
locations and dimensions of all buildings and structures, uses therein, and all principal site
dwelopment features, such as landscaped areas, r@reational facilities, pedestdan plazas and
wallovays, service entries, driveways, and off-streel parking and loading areas.
(E) A preliminary landscape plan, at a scale not smaller than 1 inch = 20 feet,
showing existing landscape features to be retained or removed, and showing proposed
landscaping and landscaped site development features, such as outdoor recreational facilities,
bicycle paths, trails, pedestdan plazas and walkways, water features, and other elements.
(F) Preliminary building elevations, sections, and floor plans, at a scale not smaller
than 1/8 inch = 1 foot, in sufficient detail to determine floor area, gross residential tloor area,
inlerior circulation, locations ol uses within buildings, and the general scale and appearance of
the proposed development.
(G) A proposed plan of parking, loading, traffic circulation, and transit facilities; and
a proposed program for satisfying traffic and transportation needs generated by the
development.
(H) A volumetric model of the site and the proposed development, portraying the
scale and relationships ol the proposed de\relopment to the site illustrating he form and mass
of the proposed buildings.
(l) An architectural model of each proposed building, at a scale not smaller than 1
inch = 40 feet, portraying design details.
(J) A proposed program indicating order and timing of construction phases and
Odnance No. 16, Serls8 ot lgso
phasing of recreational amenities and additional amenities.
SECTION 6 - Permitted Conditional and Accessory Uses.
(A) In Development Area A - Vail Run (existing building and recreational facilities),
the tollowing uses shall be permitted:
(1) Multiple family residential dwellings;
(2) Accessory retail, restaurant and service establishments not occupying
more than 18,0m square feet including the following:
Apparel Stores
Art supply stores and galleries
Book stoEs
Camera stores and photographic studios
Candy stores
Chinaware and glassware stores
Specialty food stores
Florists
Gift stores
Hobby stores
Jewelry stores
Leather goods stores
Liquor stores
Newsstands and tobacco stores
Professional and business offices
Sporting goods stores
Stationery stores
Toy stores
Variety stores
Barber shops
Beauty shops
Travel and ticket agencies
Delicatessens with food service
Cocktail lounges, tavems and bars
4
Odlnancs No. 16, Sanes ot 19SO
Cotfee shops
Fountiains and sandwich shops
Restaurants
Additional businesses or services detemined to be similar to permitted uses.
(B) In Dwelopment Area B - Simba Run, the fotlowing uses shall be permitted:
(1) Multiple family residential dwellings which may be condominiumized for
sale as interval ownership fee interests and the employee housing units required per
Section 18.48.110 which shail be rentat units.
(C) In Development Areas A and B the following conditional uses shall be
permitted, subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 18.60 hereof:
(1) Public utility and public service uses;
(2) Public buildings, grounds, and facilities;
(3) Public or private schools;
(4) Public park and recreation facilities;
(5) Meeting rooms.
{D) ln Development Areas A and B the following accessory uses shall be permitted:
(1) Indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including, but not limited to,
swimming pools, tennis courts, handball and squash courts and similar
recreational facilities.
(2) Home occupations, subject to issuance of a Home Occupaiion Permit in
accord with the provisions of Section 18.58.130 hereof.
(3) Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or
conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.
SECTION 7 - Development Standards.
The following development standarG have been submitted to the Planning and
Environmental Commission for its consideration and recommendations and are hereby
approved by the Town Council; these standards shall be incorporated in the Approved
Development Plan pertinent to each Development Area to protect the integrity of the
development of SDD No. 5; the following are the minimum dwelopment standards and shall
apply unless more restrictive standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan.
Ordnrncg No. 16, Seri€s ot l9g3
The standards set forth in this ftticle shall apply only to Development Area B. Development
Area A may be modified provided that no such modification shall increase fie discrepancy
between fte structure or site improvements and the development standards set forth in this
Article for Development Area B.
(A) Lot Area - Development Area B shall consist of approximately 6.0 acres.
(B) Setbacks - The required setbacks shall be as indicated on the Approved
Development Plan, being a minimum of 20 feet from any perimeter property llne of the total
site.
(C) Distance Between Buildings - The minimum distances between all buildings on
the site shallbe as indicated on the Approved Development Plan.
(D) Height - The maximum height of all buildings shall be 45 feet, with the
exception of the buildings located in Phase ll of Development Area B, which shall have a
maximum height as indicated on the Approved Development Plan.
(E) Density Control - The floor area of all buildings and the number of dwelling
units shall not exceed the following prwisions:
Develooment Area B Total SDD No. 5
Maximum gross residential floor
area (sq. ft.)
fnterual Ownenhip Units 124,691 197,691
Maximum gross residential floor area
Employee Dwelling Units (sq. ft.) 7,137
Maximum number of dwelling
units, not including the employee
dwelling units 1 15 189
(F) Building Bulk Control - Building bulk, maximum wall lengths, marimum
dimensions of building groups, and requirements for wall off-sets, shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plan.
(G) Site Coverage - Not more than 2O per cent of the Development Area B shall be
covered by buildings, with the exception of Phase ll ol Development Area B, which shall be as
designated on the Approved Development Plan.
(H) Landscaping and Natural Open Space - A minimum of 60 per cent of
Development Area B shall be landscaped or natural open space in accordance with the
Approved Development Plan, with the exceplion of Phase ll of Development Area B, which
shall be as designated on the Approved Development Plan.
oldlnanc€ No. 16, sedes of 1993
(t) Parking and Loading -
(1) Off-street parking shall be provided in accord with Chapter'18.52 of this
ordinance; at least 85 per cent of the glggg! parking shall be located within the main
building or buildings, or beneath ac@ssory decks, temaces, plazas, or tennis courts
and shall be completely enclosed and screened from view, with the exception of Phase
ll of Development Area B, which shall be as designated on the Apprwed Development
Plan.
(2) No parking or toading area shall be located in any required front setback
area or on the south side of any building, and no parking or loading shall be permitted
at any time in areas designated lor recreation or open space use on the Apprwed
Development Plan.
(3) Driveways, passenger loading areas, and pafking areas not located
within a building shall be permitted only as indicated on the Approved Development
plan.
(4) On-site parking shall be provided for common canierc providing charter
service to the development; said parking sites shall be indicated on the Approved
Development Plan.
(J) The Approved Development Plan for Phase ll of Development Area B shall
consist of the following drawings provided by Morter Architects:
. Sheet No. 1, dated June 1, 1993, and revised July 30, 1993 (Landscape Plan)
. Sheet No.2, dated April 12, 1993, and revised May'13, 1993 andJune 14,
1993 (Vicinity Plan/Site Section)
. Sheet No. g, dated June 1, 1993, and revised June 14, 1993, June 15, 1993
and July 15, 1993 (Site Plan)
. Sheel No.'s 4, 5 and 6, dated April 12, 1993 (Floor Plans for Unit Types A, B
and C)
. Sheet No. 7, dated May 13, 1993 (Floor Plans for Employee Housing Building)
. Sheet No. 8, dated April 12, 1993 (Elevations for Unit Types A and B)
. Sheet No.9, dated April 12, 1993, and revised June 1, 1993 (Elarations for
Unit Type C)
. Sheet No. 10, dated June 1, 1993 (Project Phasing Plan)
ORlinance No. 16. Se?ie{ of 190s
)
SECTION I - Recreational Amenities Tax.
The recreational amenities tax due to the development within SDD No. 5, shall be
assessed at a rate not lo exceed $0.75 per square foot of floor area and shall be paid in
conjunction with construction phases and prior to he issuance of a building permit.
SECTION 9 - Special Provisions.
(A) Gonservation and Pollution Controls.
(1) All solid fuel burning devices shall conform with the Town of Vail
Fireplace Ordinance (Ordlnance No.21, Series of 1991) and as amended in the
future, The basic criteria as presently identified in the Ordinanoe are as follows:
a) Construction of open hearth wood burning fireplaces is not
permitted within the Town.
b) Dwelling units may contain:
i) One (1) EPA Phase ll certified solid fuel burning device and
no mone than two (2) gas appliances (B vent);
OR
ii) Two (2) gas log fireplaces and no more than tt'vo (2) gas
appliances (B vent).
(2) lf solid fuel burning devices are provided within the development, they
must be heat efficient through the use of glass enclosures, and heat circulating devices
as technology exists at the time of development.
(3) Developels drainage plan shall include provisions for prwention ol
pollution from surface run-off.
(4) Devefoper shall indude in the building construction in Development Area
B energy and water conseruation controls as general technology exists at the time of
construction.
(B) Phase ll of Development Area B shall include four (4) employee housing units,
and said housing units shall satisfy the requirements of a "Type lll EHU" accoding to the
Town's adopted housing ordinance (Ordinance 27, Sedes of 1992). Additionally, three of
the existing six employee housing units (numbcrs2!i207,2401, and64f2)as identified on
the Simba Run Condominium Map) shall be permanently deed restricted according to
the requirements of a "Type lll EHU" as specified in the Town of Vail's housing
O j,'t,?4 tJ":t 24oz@) '\44a''+'/
OKlnance No. 16, Senos of 19gg
LW,ffur {
ordinanee (Ordinance 27, Series of 199 restricted employee
housing units (numbers 1201, 1205 ll become'Trec-markel" dwelling
units upon such time as the above seven (fl permanenffi restricf,ett employee housing
units meet the restrictions as indicated in the Town of Vail's housing ordinance and
have been issud Temporary Ceriificates of Occupancy.
(C) Approvalof Subdivision and InterualOwnership - Intervalownership of multiple-
family dwelling unils, with the exception of the required employee clvrrelling units and the
dwelling units in Phase ll of Development Area B, is hereby approved. Subdivision of the
multiple-family dwelling units (not designated for employee housing) permitted in Development
Area B into interval ownership fee interests shall rcquire no additional approvals trom he
Town of Vail Planning and Environmenlal Commission or from the Town Council for the Town
of Vail.
(D) Recreational Amenities - The Approved Development Plan shall include the
following recreational amenities:
(1) A minimum of five additional tennis courts (Darelopment Area A
presently has three tennis courts with two of them cwered during the winter season).
Said tennis courts shall be made available to the general public on a fee basis, subject
to reasonahle regulation in favor of owners or guests of the development.
(2) Recreation amenities fund contribution of $10,000 to bs used for general
recreational improvements by the Town of Vail.
(3) Bike and pedestrian path traversing property from east property line of
Development Area A to west siG line of Development Area B shall be provided by
developer with exact location to be mutually acceptabte to devetoper and the Town.
(41 Swimming pool (in addition to exisling pool in Development Area A) of
adequate size to reasonably serve the needs of the de\relopment and shall be open to
the public on a fee basis su$ect to reasonable regulation in favor of owners or guests
of the development.
(E) ArlditionalAmenities-
{1) Developer shall provide adequate transportation seruices to the orvners
and guests of the devdopment so as to transport them from the dGvelopment to the
Village Core area and the Lionshead area.
(2) Developer shall provide in its Approved Dwelopment Plan a bus shelter
OftlnrnaB No, la Sdrbr ot t9!$
of a design and Iocation mutuatly agreeable to the developer and the Town Council. :
Said shelter to serue the Uonsridge area generally.
(F) Additional Flequirements -
The developer agGes wift the following requirements, which are a part of this
amendment to Special Development District No. 5:
(1) The Town shall not issue a Temporary Certificate of Occupanry lor any
of the Phase ll condominiums until sucfi time as Temporary Cerfificate ol Occupancy's
have been issued for all four units in the employee housing building.
(2) The applicant agrees to construct and maintain a public pedestrian
path through the property (north to south) and shalt grant a public access
easement to the Town of Vail prior to the Town's issuance of any Temporary
Gertificate of Oceupancy for Phase ll constructlon.
(3) The applicant shall obtain a Colorado Department of Transportation
access permit pdor to the Town's issuance ot any building or grading permiG for tre
lower bench of the development (three townhomes).
(4) The applicant agrees to permanently restrict the four employee housing
units as "Type lll" EHU's, according to the Town's adopted housing ordinance.
(5) The applicant shall add additional screen plantings in the berm along
Lion's Ridge Loop Road, and also between the North Frontage Road and the bike
path, subject to the review and approval of the Design Review Board.
(6) The applicant shall grant the Town of Vail a drainage easement through
the property, to provide for the existing drainage flow which cunently enters the site
between the proposed employee housing building and the €astem condominium
building on fie upper bench. The developer shall provide this easement to the
Community Devetopment Department for approval before the Town will release any
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the site.
(71 The applicant shall provide a bike path easement for any portion of the
relocated bike path which shall be located upon the applicanfs property. The
easement shall be submitted lo the Community Development Department by the
developer and executed prior to the Town's issuance of any building permits tor the
project.
10
Ordranc€ No. 18, Ssriss ol 199s
I
sEcTtoN 10
lf any part, seclion, subsec{ion, senten@, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validily of the remaining
portions of this ordinance; and the Town Gouncil hereby declares it would have passed
this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof,
regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 11
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is
necessary and proper for fire health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and its inhabitants
thereof.
SECTION 12
The repeal or the repeal and reenac'tment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code
as provided in this ordinance shall not atfect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed,
any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commencEd, nor
any other action or proceeding as @mmenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provisions or
any ordinance previousty repealed or superseded unless stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE lN FULL, this _ day of 1993. A public hearing on
this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail,
Colorado, on the _ day of 1993, in the Municipal Building of the Town.
Mayor
Attest:
Town Clerk
11
Ordnencc ilo, .|6, S€i€s ot tS93
,:
INTRODUCED, READ, ADOPTED AND ENACTED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLTSHED (rN FULL) (By T|TLE ONLY) TH|S _ DAy OF 1993.
Mayor
Town Clerk
Odblancs No. 16, S€des ol lgtrl
12
t
FI!. T CilPVMINTIIES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST t7,1999
7:30 P.M.
4 *gula meeting of the vail Towa council wae held on Tuesday, August l?, lgg$, in the
Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Buildisg. lhe meting was caled to order at 7:36
P.M.
MEMBER^S PRESENT:Pegg;y Ostcrfoes, Mayor
Jin Gibson
Jim Shearer
Tom Steinberg
Rob LeVine
Bob Buckley
Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-TemMEMBER ABSENt
TOWN OIIFICIALS PRBSENT: Larry Grafel, ActiagTown Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attoraey
Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk
Before Citizen Participation, Mayor Osterfoss reviewed the criteria for nominatioa of
applicants for the Chuck Anderson Youth Recognition Award. Ernest Medina, Jr., one of this
year's award recipients, had been unable to atteud the award prcsentations made on July 6,
1993, and, in town this evening, he was fomally presented his award. Bob Buckley spoke
highly in Ernest's behall and Ernest thanked Couacil.
Agenda Item No. 1 was Citizen Participation. Christy Hochtl expressed mnoem about I-70
noise levels and safety issues. She felt the most immediate solutim to her conoems was
lowering the speed limit ftom 65 mph to 55 mph on sections of I-70 passing through Vail and
the east and west Vail outskirt sections of the interstate. Ms. Hochtt noted OS mph speed
limits wer€ lowered through most of the towas along I-?Q and questioned why Vail'Jwasnot.
She felt tlre cost of this option would only be related to changi:rg speed limit signage, and.,if the limits were properly enforrced, would raise moDey and save livee. She also point out
that outof'state drivere, in partictlar, do not understand the driving dangerc associatea witf
the high speed limit and uasafe driving conditions related to weather and road conditions,
arrd they do uot attempt to slow down. She urgert Council to examine options, include
consete walls to cut dowu on the traffic noise. Jim Gibson shared Ms. Hochtl's concems, but
felt if the speed limit were lowered, jake brakes would be ueed all of the tine. He also felt
Vait looked better than a wall to cut down noise levels, feeling better enforcement was
needed. It was pointed out the "Tlees for Vail" program was, in part, designed to help absorb
noise from. I-70. Mayor Osterfoss advieed Ms. Hochtl this issue was onC of Cou:acil's short
and long term goals, and suggested she put her ideas in writing.
Item No.2 was a Coneent Agenda oonsisting of one item. Mayor Osterfoee read the title in
full:
Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1993, eecond reading, an ordinance anending Title 1?,
SubdivisioDs, and providlng for a requirenent for prcof of payment of property taxes;
aad setting forth details in regard thereto. tbe ap'plicant was the Town of Vail.
Rob I-eVine moved to approve Ordinanoe No. 18, Series of 1993, on ee@nd reading with a
second from Jim Gibeou. A vote was taken and the motiou passed r.nanimously, g-e.
Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 16, Serieg of 1991t, second readir n an ordinance repealing and
reenacting Ordinance No. 29, Series of 19?7, Ordinance No. 33, Seriee of1978, and Ordinance
No. 24, Series of lg86; an ordiaance amending Special Development District ($DD) No. b(simba Run^/ail Run) and providing for a development plan and ite contents; pernitted,
conditional and acceseory uses; dwelopment etandarde, rweation smenitiee tax, and other
special prodsions; and setting forth iletaile in rcgard thereto. the applicant was Simba Land
CorporationAilalid Said" Mayor Osterfoss read the title in fuil. Mike Mollica poi:nted out
f " --
shanges to Section I - Special Prorisions, including Sectiou 9(AXlXa) 8nd (bxi) and (ii) and
Section 9(AXZ) relating to conservation and pollutiou contrcls, Sestion 9(B) related to
Employee Housing Units (EHUs), uod Section 9(FX2) and (6) related to additional
requiremente of tJre ordinance since fust reading. A typo was also noted for correction in
Section (gXB) to indicate that unit numbers 1201, 12n5, and 2205 (not 2202) would become
"free-market" flvslling u'rdts. Mike and Jim Shearen had vieited the dsvelo'pment the
previoue weeh and Jim Shearer noted they had met with reprresentatives of the owners and
represeatativee of the condominium association. He stated he hail beea pleasantly surprised
at the units offered to TOV as part of this SDD requeeL Jay Peterson said he had spoken
to IVh. Sai{ the developer, and Mr. Said indicated, of the existing eix EHUs, he wanted to
keep three (8) one (1) bedroom units, numbers %207,240L, and ?1102, as the pemanently
deed restricted IYpe In EHUg. llrere was Council consqnsus on wbdch three (3) of the eix
(6) existing EIfUs would become "ftee'market" units and which would becoue restricted
dwelling units. Per the ordinaoe, the applicant also agree4 as part of Phase II of the
pqiect, to pernanently restrict four (4) additional EHUg aB fype III ElfUs, sccording to
TO\Po adopted housing orditratrce. Mr. Peterson, noting the qdinence aleo required the
applicant to constnrct and naintain a public pedestrian path tbmugh the property (north to
south) and grant a public acoess easement to TOV prior to TO\ra isauance of any Temporary
Certificate of Occupancy for Pbage tr constmction, and additionally, asked TOV to indennify
the applicant on the pedestrian path. Tm Moorhead felt that the request was reasonable.
After brief disc'ussion, Jin Gibeon moved to approve Ordinanoe No. 16, $eries of 1993, on
second reading, with a seond from Tom Steinberg. Avote was taken aad the motion passed
rUrenivngfrgly, g-S.
Item No. 4 was Ordinance No. 11, Seriee of 1993, frst reading, an ordinance rezoning Tlact
C of the Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision from Greenbelt and Natural Opea Space zoning
to Single Family Reeidential zoning, a tract located within Spraddle Creek Estaies
subdivision, an approximately 40 acre parcel located north and eagt of the Main Vail I-70
interchange. the applicaat was SBC Development Corporation, a Colorado Corporation.
Mayor Osterfoss read the title ia fuil. The applicant was reques#ng a setback variance, a
minor eubdivision and rezoning ia order to locate a gatehouse, wbich would include the
subdivision's caretaker flsslling unit, on the site. Mike Mollica referenced the Commudty
Development Department's (CDD) Ar4ust 9, 1993, memo to the Planning and Environmental
Commisaion (PEC), in parbicular the section of the memo regarding evaluation of citeria of
the zone change request from Greenbelt and Natural Open Space to Siogle Family
Resideatial Zone District. The above referenced memo stated, at this ti-e, all of the
conditions of the major subdivision approval had been fulfilled and conetruetion of the
subdivision's infrastmcture was underway. Mike Bummarized and stated that etaff was
recommending approval of the rezoniag to Single Family Besiilential. He pointed out the
applicant was proposing to restrict the pmperty to a permanentty deed restricted EHU. He
also noted the GRFA was being significantly reduced- Under Single Fanily Reeidential
%onilg this lot would have construction capacity for approximately 7,500 squarc feet of
GRFA; the applicant was proposing a maximun total of 1,625 square feet. Floor plana were
displayed a:rd reviewed by Mike. He added the sit€ ooverage would also be reduced to 2,000
square feet, andthe applicant had ageed towaive the "250 allowance" whicb wouldnomally
be available to any property with a dwglling unit on it. Mike said the ownenhip of the
prcperty would remain with either SBC Development Corporation or tbe Sp'raddle Creek
Homeownere Association and that had been built into the conenants which TOV was a party
to. The covenants could not !s nhanged without the apprcval of TOV. The PEC revie,wed
this, approved the minor suMivision, and tJre variance with tbe cosdition that the zone
change be approved- The PEC also recommended approval of the zone change. In response
to Rob LeVine's question about TOV being a party to the ovenante, Mike aaid TOVdoes not
actually sign the covenants, but there were a numberof sectionsin the covenants which could
oot be amended without the appmval of TOV. As me exarDple, Mike stated that there was
language in the oovenants regadling three (3) caletaker units in the suMivision, aad therc
was a requirement that three (S) of the lots have restf,icted EHUs and that this language
could not be modifred without the approval of TOV. Additionally, the Desigrr Guidelioes were
an exhibit to the covenants whic.h aleo could not be modifreil witbout the apprwal of TOV.
Jay Petenson noted the developer was under a ninety (90) day obligation under the covenalts
to transfer not only the gatehouse Oract C), but the open spase tracts to tbe lloneownet's
Association. After brief discussion, ilim Gibson moved to approve Oritinance No. 11, Series
of 1993, on first reading, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken an tbe motion
passed rrnarrinsush, gQ.
I
Z
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I
METt'ORANDUM
Town Council
Community Development Department
August 17, 1993
Simba Run employee housing units
Unit No.
2207
2401
2402
ll. EHU's - Release Restrictions:
Unit No.
1201
1205
2205
SIMBA RUN
Employee Housing Units
EHU's - Permanently Restricted:
Size
593.2 sq. ft.
761.0 sq. ft.
655.7 sq. ft.
2/OO?,1
Size
2.t 650, 2_
Bedrooms
1-north tacing
1-south facing
with deck and
ski mountain
view
1-north facing
with deck
Bedrooms
1-north facing
2-north facing
2-north facing
549.3 sq. O. "/@,,
1,037.9 sq. ft.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Town Council
Community Development Department
August 17, 1993
Simba Run employee housing units
Unit No.
2247
2401
2402
ll. EHU's - Release Restriclions:
Unit No.
1201
1205
2245
SIMBA RUN
Employee Housing Units
EHU's - Permanently Restricted:
Size
593.2 sq. It.
761.0 sq. ft,
655.7 sq. ft.
Size
549.3 sq. ft.
1,063.0 sq. ft.
1,037.9 sq. ft.
Bedrooms
1-north facing
1-south facing
with deck and
ski mountain
view
1-north facing
with deck
Bedrooms
1-north facing
2-north facing
2-north facing
F!!_ t f;ilPV
f5.02.020(A) and 15.02.020(G) of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, to provide for the
adoption of Chapter 81 of the 1993 Supplement of the Unifom Building Code and to provide
fu the adopti,on of the 1993 Edition of the National Electrical Code, and anending Section
15.02.030(C) of the Municipal Code of the Towa of Vail to pmvide for the adoption of an
amual elevator inspection fee in the amount of $160.00 for each elevatoq and an annual
commer''cial dumbwaiter inspection fee in the anount of $76.00 fm eacb dumbwaiter, and a
will call inepec[ion fee in the amount of $a.OO per pemit; and providing detailg in regard
tJrereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. l[erv L,apin moved to apprue Ordioanoe No.
15, Series of 1993, on eeeond readiag, with a eecond fimm Rob LeVine. Before a vote was
taken, Jim Shearer asked if, by inepecti"g thege, TOV was taking any liability if soeething
happened to an elevator. Gary Mu:nain eaid there was no more liability than TOV had on
any other inspection. Gary said TO\ls liability was much higher without the ordinaace.
After brief dissussion iacluding camment about NWCCOG'g elevator inepection program's
sucoess, a vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. 6 was Orditranae No. 6, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance amending Title
12 - Streets and Sidewalks of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, by the addition of
Chapter 12.16 - Revocable Right of Way Pemits, and aetting forth de+q'ls in regard thercto.
Mayor Osterfoss read tbe title iu full. The applicant was the Town of Vail. llm Devlin
point€d out and erplained the addition of Sections 12.16.010 B(8), D(1), anil D(S) to the
ordinance since first reading. Council had asked statrto review the exirtingRevocable Bigbt
of Way process and asked that aa ordinanoe be created that would serye both the private and
public needs by pmviding funding on TOV land for improvenents recommended by the TOV
Streetscape PIan, the TOV Wage Maeter Plan, and the Lionshead Urban Desig:r Guide
Plan. Statr had addressed the Courrcil's concerns about desigdlabor oosts as well as the
question of who repaired improvements after unforeseen pmbleas euch as utility work, etc.
Tim Devlin indicated Jim Lamolt was present and had requested the addition of language
to Section 12.16.010 (DXl) to indicate that costs and maiutenance agreement would be set
after a review of Town Council. ffi. r.^meat discussed the maintenance isgue. He said tbe
private sectffi becane a donor to the public by completing al' inpuovement on public property,
and he felt the maiatenance agtreement should be fairly specific as to who was responsible
for repairs. He felt the maintenance issue needed to be spelled flrt, including when that
responsibility may tcminate. Statr agreed. After brief diec'ussion concerning Section
12.16.020 regarding revocation of peruits, Merv Lapin mwed to approve Ordinance No. 6,
Series of 1993, on second reading, with the addition of language to Section D(1) to state "...
The coets 64fl rnaintesance agneement ehall be eet after a review of the ?own Council." Rob
LeVine seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Jim Gibson erpressed conceno about
the timeframe for removal by permittees of encf,oachments, obstnrctious, or other structures
as stated in 12.16.020 A(1). He felt the timefrane should rlepend on individual cases anal
should be detemined by staff. I(ristan did not feel it was a problem if Corncil wanted to
extend the timeframe. fim Devlin suggested placi:rg a sixty (60) day cap as the timeframe.
After discussion, Merv Lapin amended his motion to change the timeframe to sixty (60) days,
and Rob LeVine amended his gecond. After brief discussion, a vote was taken and the
amended motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. 7 wae ffiinaafie No, 16 fuie* of 1993, ffrst readiqg, an ordinance repealing and
reenacting Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1977, ffiinance No. 33, Series of 1978, and Ordinance
No. 24, Series of 1986; an ordinane amending Special Development District No. 5 and
pmviding for a development plan and ite ontents; permitted" cunditional and acessory uses;
development standards, recreation anenities tax, and other special prordsions; and setting
forth details in regard tJrereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title ia full. Mike Mollica not€d
this ordinance had passed on first readiag on July 6, 1993, then action taken on first reading
was rescinded on sccond reading on July 20, 1993, with directioa to stalfto refer the issue
back to the PEC for r",econsideration, ald so that stafrould give formal notice of echeduled
hearings to the Simba Run Condominium Association folnal notie. He stated that had now
been done. The project went back to the PEC, and at tbeir last ueeting they unanirnouely
recommended approval. Mike said the ondinance wae essentially the ge-e as first readiag
with the exception of the addition of two (2) cmditions concenring the grantingto TOV of a
drainage eagement and a bike path easement These were conditi,ons that were discussed
extensively at the PEC review on numerous oocasions and failed to make the JuIy 6, 1993,
first reading but were now iacluded. It was Mike's understanding that the applicant agreed
to those conditions. Mike said staffwas now recommending approval with the two added
conditions. He pointed out that the issue of employee housing had mme up at the PEC
meeting. The PEC felt that ginoe it was not part of their origiml motion to include the
q.1 '11
" Tf*Cr*-I
pernatrent rcstrictioD m the existing air (6) Employee Housing Units (EHUc) dudng tbe first
review, they fid uot feel it was appmpriate to incluile it now. However, the PEC hail gone
on record stati'g they supported the Council's direction to proceed with the potnutial
permanent reetriction on tbe eristing six (6) EHUg. In gummsry, Mike said the PEC
reommeuded appronal witb the penmaneat deed regtriction on the four (4) EHUs that would
be part of this fiaal phase of tbe pmject. He rwalled therr was an iesue raiseal at the last
Council meeting regartling the geotogic hazard report and whether it was appro'priate. He
said Nicholas T.ompirie, pruject gpologist, wae asked to review the potential bazad agairL
Included ia statrs July 26, 1993, memo, waa a surunary report dated July 22, 199$, from Mr.
Lampirie and staffwas now confortable that the letter of the Code had bee,u met. there was
discussion about reatri,ction of the eix (6) eristingEHUg. Mike gaid that restriction wae not
in this pmposed ordinance on firrt reading. He indicated the ordinance was writt€o iD
acaordance with the PEC recm,mendations wbich did not include restrictims on the exietiag
six (6) EHUg. Jim Gibeon stated the uiginal SDD ortlinance included thoee six (6) EHUg
with a teruinatioa date of twenty (20) years. Mayor Osterfass recalled when tbis ordinaaee
was rcviewed before, the restristion of the eristing six (6) EHUs was not in the ordiranoe
either, but the mqionity of Council had voted to have thet aildeil to the orilinance. Mike
advised agafu that the ordinance was written sccording to tbe recommendation of the PEC
and Couscil could modiS the odinance or direct staff to add such language betwe€n first and
second rmding.
Jim Monter, rrepresenting the applicant, apologized for Morter Ar&itests' errcr with the
notification prucedure wbich hait delayed this ordiuance. He reviewed issues raised at the
prrevious hearing inclurling the required alrainage easemeut which he indicated was currently
being resolved with Greg Hall; the reqrrired bike patb easenent on their property, which Mr.
Mortcr said was now being taken off the property eo no easement would be required; the
pedeetrian access acroffi their pmperty, which Mr. Morter said was being discuseed with their
attomey, adiling the applicant was paying for the constnrstion of that path; and the rockfall
hazard rcport whicb had now been onpleted and lVIr. I-,ampiris was omfortable witb- Ilae
mqior issue raised previously was the EHU iesue. !vlr. Morter said his dient agreed with
Council itr terms of the importance and dire neeil fcr employee housing. Mr. Morter further
stated he was caught by surprise at the last Courcil meeting and had aot made two
important points regarding the employee housing. those points included owuership of the
different properties that were part of this SDD. [.fr. Msber said there was a property line
that totally defiaedtwo(2) pieces of pmperty; one piece beingthe newprojectbeingpmposed,
the other was the other Simba Run Phase I property. He inforned Council t"bat the two (2)
piees of Foperty were under two different ownerships. Mr. Morter eaid Mr. Said was
involved with the ownership of both properties, and there were partnerg involved. He
emphasized tbese were two (2) different ownerships; two (2) difierent pieces of property. Mr,
Morter discusged the number of units being pmposed for this pmject. He noted there were
conflicting docunents regarding the original SDD and, depending oa which document was
reviewed, the uumber of required ElfUs raaged from eight (8) to ten (10). Mr. Morter
pointed out that the number of units in the new project had been reduced from forty four (44)
to n:ineteen (19), and they were stiU providing four (4) EHUs, and be felt that was far
exceeding tbe ratio of EHUs to market unik that most projects required. He said they
recogrized that opening up a new discussion on a rrew SDD or a modified SDD was a
negotiation proess. Mr. Morter advised Council that what his dient was giving TOV,
sdthout beirog ask€d, included a much better pmject in terms of scale, further developoent
of architecture that exieted on Simba Run, inprcveil landscaping; hidden vehicle access to
every rrnit behiud the units; oorrection of TOV'g mistu&s regarding tJre bile path, rcduction
in uumber of units - a reduction of 8,774 Bquare feet of GRFA; more EHUs per ratio than
expected, anil the right of public acess through the site at their cost. Witb respect to EHUs,
Mr. Morter said the applicant ilitl accept providiag four (4) EHUs for life duration, but the
exietirg six (6) EHUg were under differrent ownerehip, and the applicants whole financial
plan was based on the assr:nption tbat a deal was a deal. N[r. Morter said ![r. Saitl did not
accept the idea of converting the existing six (6) EHUg to lifetime EHUg.
There was lengthy diecussion about the eize of the existing EHUs and considsratiou of
suggested option coaceruing cmversion e sale of tho$e EHtIs or building new pemmently
restriet€d EHUe on the project in lieu of thoee. Mr. Morter eaid that idea had been
suggested, b'ut that ilid uot work on the new pmject fron the standpoint of fitting them on
the site, Mr. Morter reviewed site plons udth Council to grve a visual view of thatn and stated
that one thing they had lookeil at was adding one mone floor to one of the buildings.
However, that would require an elevator and would e.hange the Building Code classification
of tb.e structure.
Tom Moorhead noted there was a change in the position of the applicant between the pEC
hearing and this meeting. Tom Moorhead saia.lay feterson had represented that Mr. Said's
orarnership was 1007o of the existing Bix (6) EHU;, and that o,u" th" way the pEC reviewed.
tJris issue. Mr. Morter said Mr. Said owned the existing six (6) EHUs, but he had partners
in development of the nerv property. It was then egtablished there were no partners ia theexisting six (6) EIrUs. In that case, Bob l"eVine asked why there were aly problems in
changing the format of the existing six rrnifu,
Mayor Osterfoss noted also that I\rIr. Morter had mentioned. the eaeement issue which she
assumed was between Mr. Saids pmperty on one side and the property he and partners owa
on the other area, that was cunently not buildable, because oionloirrg negotiation betweeu
the properties. Mr. Morter confirmed that. tr/Ir. Morier stated lfr. SAI wis only the owaer
of the units, not the owner of the existing Simba Run property. Jim Gibson asked Mr. Morterif Mr' Said would find it inviting to be able to seli th; "i" units at market value versus
haviug to wait teu years on a present value basis of even 87a. Mr. Morter said he could not
represent Mr. Said on that issue. Mayor Oster{oss stated she was convinced the issue could
be worked out fnrm what had been diseussed. She said the issue here was that Council wasiatelested' ia securiDg the permanent resbiction of ten (10) units. Mr. Morter guessed tb,atMr' Said would be more open to restricting some of the existing EHUg iastead of building
more ElfUs or converting new sales units to EHUs. Tom SteiubJrg expressed concern aboutpassing this ordinance on second reading without coming to ; finai agreenent on thepedestrian access across the pmperty. Tom Steinbe"g norred to table dd;t'aor" No. 1.6,
Series of 1993, on second_readi-ng until etaffcould returrr witb, more specific figures, the
owners' feelings on the EHU issue, and wbether an agreement, could be reached. fhe"" *as
no second to that motion. Mr. Morter said they were plsnn;ng to get the project started thisyear and preferred action other than tabling the ordinance. wfayo" Osterfoss reminded Mr.Morter that changes could be made betweeu first and second reading. Bob Buckley felt
strongly that a deal wa9 made in a previous project aud that it was uifair to go back anal
change that deal. He felt there weri some basic rights property owners had,*and he was
pleased with the fact that the project had gone fmu-forty foiu faal units down to nineteen(19) gniis on the very visible site. He felt that vras a very commendable, positive act by the
developer, and he was opposed to adding a penalty for luch positive action. Jim Shearer
agreed. Jim Gibson suggested to Mr. Morter that Mr. Said night want to entertain the idea
of permanently restricting the smaller ElIUs. However, Jim Gibson said he would only
entertain that as a Councilpersoa if the applicant brought tbat to Council and said that was
what he wanted to do. Rob LeVine noted this was not two separate pmjects. It was oneproject, one entity from a zoning point of view, and these were the zoning issues. ToV was
not re-opening the SDD, the applicant was. Mayor Osterfoss felt TOV SDD c"iteria has aprovision whereby various mitigations/contributions were weighted so it could be determi:red
what was appropriate in any given scenario. She felt Rob's point was well taken, but felt
tthgre
^wa1
opqortunity for creative compromise based on ideas expressed at this meeting.
After further discussion,_Mr. Morter suggested that so this could be considered a first readiig(so the applicent could keep on schedule and hopefully conclude at the next meeting), th6
lPnlicant build four (4) EIIUs, deed restrict tbem forever, and deed res8ict three t8fiithe
EHU.s ia the existing bgldings, fts,ss rrnitu being of the applicant's choice, and drop therestriction ou the other three (3). Menr Lapil thought staf ehoda took at the existilg EHUs
!"i91 to meln"g that connitment to see what TOV was being given. Mew Lapin moved that
Ordinance No. L6, Series of 1993, be approved on first
"eaaing, with the eonditioa that the
suggestiou the ownet's representative, Jin Morter, made to permanently deed restrict four(4) new EHUs, release three (3) existing EHUg for immediate sale, and pernanently deedrestrict the remaioing three (3) existing EHUs, and that staff be directed, perhaps vrith a
member of Council, to go look at tbe units to see if they were appropriati, aod. that thepedestrian access across the property be finalized and agreed to prioi to second reading. Mr.
Morter asked that the motion indicate that the tbree (3) pernalently restrictecl EIIUJ be at
the discretion of his client, however Merv Lapio wanted statr and Council to see the unitsfirst. Rob LeVine seconded the motion. After brief further comment, a vote was taken and
the motion passed lnanirngqsly, ?-0.
Item No. 9 was ordinance No. 17, Series of 1gg3, fimt reading, aa ordinance approviag a
Qneciat Development District (knowu as sDD No. 28, 'llhe valley, phase IIj, and the
development plan in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and settingforth details in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Andy Knudtsei
7:30 P.M.
7:35 P.M.
Mike Mollica
7:40 P.M.
Mike Mollica
8:10 P.M. 4.
Mike Mollica
1.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 19St
7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHA|T|BERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
CONSENT AGENDA:
Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance amending
Title 17, Subdivisions, and providing for a requirement tor proof of paymenl
ol property tares; and setting fofih details in regard thereto. Applicantr
Town of Vail.
Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repeating
and reenacting Ordinance No. 29, Series ol 1977, Ordinance No. 03,
Series of 1978, and Ordinance No.24, Series of 1986; an ordinance
amending Special Development District No. 5 (Simba FtunA/ail Run) and
providing for a development plan and its contents; permitted, conditional
and accessory uses; development standards, recreation amenities tax, and
other special provisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Action Reouested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 16,
Series of 1993, on second reading.
Backoround Rationale: Please see the CDD memos to the pEC dateo
June 28, 1993, and July 26, 1993. On Juty 26, 1999, the pEC
recommended approval (by a vote of 6-0) of the applicani's request for a
major amendment to SDD No. 5. The PEC did ailow for one (1) actditionat
unit having a total GRFA of 1,602 square feet to be added to tre project
in the future.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993, on
second reading.
Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1993, tirst reading, an ordinance rezoning Tract
C of the Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision from Greenbelt and Natural
Open Space zoning to Single Family Residential zoning, a tract located
within Spraddle Creek Estates subdivision, an approximately 40 acre parcel
located north and east of the Main Vait l-70 interchange. Appticanta sBc
Development Corporation, a Colorado Corporation.
Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 11,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backqround Rationale: Please see enclosed GDD memo to the pEC dated
August9, 1993.
Statf Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1gg3, on
first reading.
3.
, i^v
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAH EVENING MEETTNG
TUESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1993
7:30 P.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M. 1.
7:35 P.M. 2.
7:40 P.M. 3.
Shelly Mello
Tom Moorhead
8:10 P.M. 4.
Shelly Mello
Tom Moorhead
8:30 P.M. 5.
Gary Murrian
Tom Moorhead
8:50 P.M. 6.
Tim Devlin
Tom Moorhead
EXPANDED AGENDA
CITTZEN PARTICIPATION.
Approval of the Minutes of the Juty 6, 1993, and July 20, 1 993, Vail TownCouncil Evening Meeting Minutes.
Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1gg3, second reading, an ordinance amendingchapter 16.04, and sections 16.12.010, 16.20.0i0, 16.20,220, 16.22.010,16.22.160, 16.26.010, 16.20.015, and 16.22.014 of the Town of VailMirnicipal code to provide for the prohibition of neon signs and exterior gas
filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs, and providing rigurations regarolngthe review of alt other gas filed. iiluminaied and-fibdr optic sigrii, andinterior accent lighting; and providing details in regard theieto.
Actr:on legu,e.sted of Co : Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 5,Series of 199S, on second reading.
Ordinance No, 13, Series of 1gg3, second reading, an ordinance
amending Paragraphs 16.92.090(F) and 16.32.0a-0(A) of the MuniciparCode of the Town of Vail, to provide for the termination of any non_conforming sign five years after the effective date of any amendmeni to tneSign Code Ordinance, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
@: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. .l3,
Series of 1993, on second reading.
ordinance No. 1s, series of 1gg3, second reading, an ordinance amending
section 1 5.02.020 (A) and 1s,02.020(c) of rhe Municipat code of the Town
of Vail, to provide for the_ adoption of chapter 31 of tire 1993 supptement
of .the unitorm Buitding code and to provide for the adoption of ihe 1993
Edition of the Nationat Etectricat code, and amending seciion 1s.02.m0(a)
of the Municipat code of the Town o{ Vair to providifor the adoption o}inelevator inspection fee in the amount of gl5b.00 for each elevator, anJacommercial dumbwaiter inspection fee in the amount of $75.00 for eachdumbwaiter, and a will call inspection fee in the amount of $S.00 ;;rpermit; and providing details in regard thereto.
@: Approve/deny/modify ordinance No. 1s,Series of 1993, on second reading.
staff Recom.mendatiql: Approve ordinance No. 15, series of .r99s, onsecond reading.
Ordinance No.6, Series.of 1993,9qco1d reading, an ordinance amendingTitle 12 - streets and sidewarks of the Municipafcooe of the Town oi t;i,Vail by the addition of chapter 12.16 - Revocabte Right of way eermits,
and setting forth dekils in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail.
Actrln le,qu,Tted of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 6,Series of 1993, on second reading.
Backoround Rationalg: council had directed staff to review the existing
(
J
9:00 P.M. 7.
Mike Mollica
Tom Moorhead
9:30 P.M. 8.
Andy Knudtsen
Tom Moorhead
9:45 P.M. 9.
Mike Mollica
Tom Moorhead
Revocable Right of Way process and asked for an ordinance to be created
that would serve both the private and public needs by providing funding on
TOV land for improvements recommended by the TOV Streetscape Plan,
the TOV Village Master Plan, and the Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan.
Staff has addressed the Council's concerns about design/labor costs as
sell as the question of who repairs improvements after unforeseen
problems such as untility work, etc.
Statt Recomrnendation: Approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1993, on
second reading.
Ordinance No. 16, Series ol 1993, tirst reading, an ordinance repealing
and reenacting Ordinance No.29, Series of 1977, Ordinance No. 33, Series
of 1978, and Ordinance No.24, Series of 1986;an ordinance amending
Special Development District No. 5 and providing for a development plan
and its contents; permitted, conditional and accessory uses; development
standards, recreation amenities tax, and cther special provisions; and
setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Simba Land
CorporationMalid Said
Action Reauested of Council: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance No, 16,
Series of 1993, on tirst reading.
Backqround Rationale: Please see the Community Development
Department's memorandums to the Pianning and Environmental
Commission (PEC) dated June 28, 1993 and July 26, 1993. On July 26,
1993, the PEC recommended approval (by a vote of 6-0) of the applicant's
request for a major amendment to SDD #5. The PEC did allow for one (1)
additional unit having a total GFIFA of 1,602 square teet to be added t0 the
project in the future.
Staff Recommendation: Approval of Ordinance No. 16, Series ol 1 993, on
tirst reading.
Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1993, first readlng, an ordinance approving a
Special Development District (Known as SDD NO. 28, The Valley, Phase
ll) and the development plan in accordance with Chapter18.40 ot the Vail
Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Action Reouested ol Council: Approve/Mcdify/Deny Ordinance No. 17,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backqround Bationale: This SDD includes t/vo tracts ol land in the Valley.
On July 12, 1993, the PEC voted 4-1 to recommend approval of the SDD
with conditions. Please see the attached minutes of the meeting which
explain the vote in detail.
Statf Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1993, on
first reading.
Item/Topic: Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1993, firsl reading, an ordinance
amending Title 17, Subdivisions, and providing for a requirement for proof
of payment of property taxes; and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Town of Vai,.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/Modify/Deny Ordinance No. 18,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backoround Flationale: Please see the Community Development
Department's memorandum to the PEC, dated July 26, 1993. The PEC,
on July 26, 1993, recommended approval of the request by a vote of 4-0.
I
IIEMORANDUM
Simba Land CorporationAi/alid Sairt
Mike Mollica
fifbr c$P#TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Envircnmental Commission
Community Derrelopment Department
July 26, 1993
A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development ot
the remaining portion of fte Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas,located at 1100
North Frontage Road.
Applicant:
Planner
On July 6, 1999, the VailTown Council reviewed Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993 (first
reading), an ordinance which provided for the development of the remaining portion of the
Simba Run SDD. The Town Council approved his ordinance by a vote of 4-2 with the
additional requirement that all ten of he employee dwelling units be permanently restricted.
Gurrently, the six existing employee dwelling units are restricted for a period of only twenty
years.
Subsequent to the Council's approval of Ordinance No. 16, Seriqs of 1993 on first reading, the
Town Attomey determined that although open communication with the Simba Run
Condominium Association has been ongoing, formal notice was not given of the scheduled
hearings. The Town Attomey has recommended thal Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993 be
rescinded and that the SDD be sent back to the Planning and Environmental Commission
(PEC) for reconsideration upon notification.
On July 20, 1993, Town Council approved a motion to rescind Ordinance No. 16, Series of
1993 on first reading. The Council also referred the issue back to the PEC for consideration.
In addition to the five conditions of approval listed in he Communig Dwelopment
Department's memorandum to the PEC (dated June 28, 1993 and revised June 29, 1993), the
stafl would recommend the following additional conditions of approval:
6. The applicant shall grant the Town of Vail a drainage easement through the property,
to provide for the existing drainage flow which cunently enters the site betw'een the
proposed employee housing building and the eastem condominium building on the
upper bench. The developer shall provide his easement to the Community
Development Department for approval before the Town will rdease any building
permits for the site.7. The applicant shall provide a bike path easement for any portion of the relocated bike
path which shall be located upon the applicanfs property. The easement shall be
submitted to the Community De\relopment DeparFnent by the dweloper and executed
prior to the Town's issuance of any building permits for the proiect.
c:bec\rnemos\sim ba.726
t
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SURJECT:
I,IEiIORANDUM
PlannirB and Environmentral Commisslon
Community Development
Juns 28, 1998 (Revlsed Jurc 29,1993) - All rEvlslons In bold
A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow lor the development of
the remaining portion of he Simba Run SDD, Saroy Villas, locabd at 1100
Norh Frontage Road and descdbed as tollows:
Thst p.tt of $€ Filtt SuFplemenilal Map b Slrrba Run Condon{nlum, amfdng !o th. map
ther€.f r€corddd ln the ltfica ot the E gb Courty, Cobrado, Clerk and Recoder, deccdbed as
bllowE:
Beglnnlng at tho most 3outfil€st€rly corner cf sald map, |h€rce the tollordng rhme co.Jrses along
$o weetedy ffne8 of said map; 1) NO3'S!Oi'E 160.79 t€€l; 2) N1?50'3:t'E 1114.72 feet 3)
N1r56'03'70.601e6t; rh€nco, depardng saH resredy fln€, sl3"16tx!'Y1t 157.26 l€or, rhenco
S76'/t3'5t'E 91.50 feet; thonce N13"1603'E 35.00 f€ot thenc€ S76'/B'5trE i2.31 fe€t to the
aagtedy line ot sald map; thence the folbwing tryo ooursos along $e €asterly afd souheasterly
Ins of said map; 1) S?4or[4'SilE 5238 feet; 2) S52"S029W 27a50 teot !o the Poi.il ot
Beglnnlru, contairirg 0.8134 acres, more or less; and
Thal part ol Slmba Run, according to the map ther€ot, recoded in Book 312 at Pag€ 763 In tho
O{flce of lhe Eagle Cornty, Colorado, Clefi and Recoder, dscdbed as ,ollours:
Beginnlry at lhe mosl southerly corngr ol sald Slmba RJn, themF the bllorlrp four oourses along
the soutlilesl.rly ard northryesterly lines ol sald Slmba Run; l) N37o0931"W 23338 fesl; 2)
394.6/ fe€t along lhe arc ol a curue to the lett, havlng a radus of 121.95 teet, a acntral angle of
10p49,06', and a chord that bears N42"13'20-E 331.07 fe€t; 3) N36%849 E 20136 feet; 4) 15.96
fed abng th€ arc ol a curve to the rlght, having a radius of 428.02 feet, a cenlral angle ol
0f08'1?, and a chotd that bears N37'52'54' E 15.96 feet lo a corn.r on tha n esiedy boundary of
ths First gJppl€mefltal Map lor Simba Run Condonilnlum, eccordlng to the map lhereol rmded in
the offtca of th€ Eagls Counily, Colorado. Clerk ard Rcoder; thcrne the following four courses
along sald w€s{€rly bourdary; l) SPr€1'28"Yt/ 69.90 f€€t;2} S17'56'03'Vl, 18'1.17 teet;3)
S1215Ogt'W 1&J2 ted;4) S0ll93S'01$/ 160.79 te€t to th€ southeastgrly lne of sald Siimba Run;
thence, along said southeast€rly [ne, S52"50'29'Vll 118.08 l€€t to the Pdnt of Beginning,
corl|aining 1.560 acr€s, rnore or less,
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land Corporation/Walld Said
Mike Mollica
I. PROJECT INTRODUCNON
The property oflner and applicant, Simba Land Corporation, is requesting a maror SDD
amendment for the remainlng phase of Special Development District #5 (Simba RunA/ail Run).
The property is located at 1100 Norh Frontrage Boad and is boun(bd by the Tirber Rbge
Aparffn€ntrs to ths west, the North Frontage Road and lnterstate 70 to the south, Phase I of
Simba Run to th€ east and Uonsridge Loop Road to the north.
I
Odinance #6, Serigs ot 1976, or[inally established SDD #5 and set the parametErs for the
development ol the Vail Run Bullding. Ordinance #29, Series ol 1977, amended SDD #5.
This amendment expanded the SDD wlth the addition of 6.3 acres lmmediataly to the west of
Vail Run ard in addition, divHed the SDD into what ls nor knonn as Development Area A
(Vail Run) and Development Area B (Slmba Run). The development etandards for both araas
were specifically sUpulalad in this odinance. SDD f5 was turther modified by the pass4e of
Odinance *3i1, Series of 1978, and Ordinance #24, Sedes of 1986.
[. DESCRIPnON OFTHEREOUEST
The propos€d development plan for the final phase of Development Area B, In SDD #5,
consists of ninetesn cordominiums and four deeGrestricted employee houdrg units. The
development plan calls for one three-unit tornhouse hrilding to be located on the southem
portion of the proparty, with vehicular acoess tiaken from the existing Simba Run cu6-cut off
ot the North Frontage Road. The northem development of the property would take aocsss
from Lionsr'Klge Loop and would consist of tour, four-unit condomlnium buildings and one,
lour-unit employee housing building. Two ctrt drts are proposed off of Uonsrldge Loop.
On the northem bench ol this site, eacfi condomlnium is proposed to hav€ a one-car garage,
and on the lower, or southem parl of this site, each condominium would have a ftvo{ar
garage.
This final phase of the SDD witl be part of the existlng Simba Run Condominium Association,
ard as such, will have access lo all of the existing recreational amenities located in the
existing Simba Run project. These recreational amenities include three outdoor tennls murts,
two indoor racquetball courts and one indoor swimming pool. Vail Run has its onm ou@or
swimming pool and two indoor tennis courts.
This proiect site is located within a high severity rockfallgeologlc hazard zone. The
applicant's consulting geologist, Nicholas Lampiris, has completed three geologic
invest[ations for the property. The originalstudy is dated April 18, 1993, with updates of lhe
strdy completed on May 18, 19S' and June 18, 1993, and allthree are attacfied to thas
memorandum.
The SDD deparb from the approved development standards in the following areas:
€lb cowrage
.enclosed parklng
.landscaplng
.helght
Since the initial PEC work session on May 10, 1993, the applicant has modifled the proposa!
in the following areas:
t
townhouses proposed for the lower bench of the project have boen shifted to the west
so that hey are complebly wihin the boundaries of the finalphaso propsrty. ln oder
to accomplish thls, the applicant has ellminated one ol the odginally proposed four
lownhouses. Thres units ars now proposed In this area.
.Vehicular aocess to tno bwer bench is now proposed fiom fie exbdng Simba Run
crJbcut.
.For salety reasons, the existing Totvn Hkepath would be relocated to &e souh, b $e
area whore the proporty llne crosses the Simba Run vehicular curbqrt.
.Additional lanGca5ling and bormlng has been added throughout fte sib.
.A pedesEian path has been added betuveen Phases I and ll on the upper benoh. This
path will allow pedestian aocess from the upper bench to the lower bench, and to the
existng Simba Run recreational tacilities and shutfe van parking to the east.
iloy a! |?3 ?r-q3 811E31)jrnxs1Sl l:*r!ts t t. d
Nl$holuu LamPiris, Ph.D.
60NVJL I I l{U ti"st LC,Ctsr
0te5 lN(jkll€ LL LArre
5iL-r. OCLOtu l;O C101?
r$3) ir?trir'ii0 1Lt Fr)U!tS)
ftclf 131 t9?5
tlal I y LrFElnerd
I'ior ter Ar r:hi tEctg
14;1 {:ast i'iEacal.J L'r'r va
nros 6r o,rrit' at Vall I
Vailr CCI Bt6S7
liF: 5'<'ro'7 Vi I I rts
',. - j. '-\.'.1 i 'r:
I h*,'rt? revi Et{*rJ thr: ttita FIi.n t,"hi c!1 you il ivr'' r ir!:frnbl y '1€ni' t:!
i..a':-'.r,ar' rlisicgt:li f.'n:! r '$or ioitill,iCr'cil $f tftn r r'x: li; iailI tr'es:{r'r:l 'r't
lirQ si ta. Ytrit i'l.,tvt-: ar!rlr'rls'irrrj riri' i:l:n{:tit'tl!i !'ii{-i' :tr: l J' i:r'rl :i':;'r ':'t-t'+
s,tiil a ci:Llpl r: ol trhanSe! or iddltlanir sihlch si:r:r''ll 'J De
I r"l g cij' P {r l' & "[ e'.i .
t{J i:. h ,tire hirn; in plac+ ilri :rDLl lr.ir,vr: dn'f in*$ tilunt vt:t-y f $}t re€ii:1
cen Fe;cll thr., ptr..ritr:ri'i tcur' irnii.* r {*.n t', r !;i1c:t'{s'l thE 'f r''-!rtt5 of
tirr:r::' unl t,; arr-. in the f r:rrn rrf Q*'ra06K. I i'.n Ft'!l c{lrlt"r::r-r::'iJ ilt;*'i
t,, 1:,qrt iii.rl c.:ctjt- i-o I !vinq rlir$l-!€i-5' Th!l 'iei5t:!rf liio.iil L:r1i l:1
iir:*evi?r'r i.jil#t'e roclr f ai i ii,-r:dr.tj'i ar-* 1r':F:i r:ieYr:i-tlt ii':r'ir 'l Lr:r''icr'
bt:f.ri er.td !1r) .-,1";i.agf to prc,i's,:t I i vin,;_ (ju*t't.tli":t. i.ir r',Y tlf i:;'e. I
r *..rt c.n;tgt,! d a thf r:a f 13ot hl glr rt,':r,.r !{,1! 1 rJrl t!'!i} floi'|.ir ;'-'': I I l";11ch
*hr:tt j d h*vF a elr-t:ni;tlr r',i:'4r:{:) 1.1(-,i-.tr) - t! l-rr:r' ':iiiLtl:i;'r! i'iillf- '1i:tl ti:l i.l
(,il:r'ii'r.r ;i.(; rii:rrlrrij ,i.r, f Flf iil trl.e i.rr {:hsL rtr-l I .
Alar:, i:!rt:i-a i.,r i b1elall tn .lh13 brr',:l i;1 1i;-rr;1i- r;i ,.i:': ii;..:, ': '.iiri i: i:il
ti.rp r,.rert f Or' rJr j. Vtltn'l .aCi:eijrS. ij:rl ,llri:r:l;;;:fl tlOr''tir:)11 i)f i-"iii:t u/rli:
r.rir{ *lr I n r:fii.. U {r.fitE c:lrrlUl. iJ b+ l;lf e :j(:fir'. sitr-f:fi9{:h 9lqI I i. rJ Lnres
r:r++i-. I.:: tilF!'a arLa iiti I I iluernt I r-:i,g r:Ertt""rct m;! '
.7ir{,{;-'-)/*'x-,'
Ni.(;i;" L,a,rdirie
tlonsul t i ng {ieol oc.l i st
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING G€OLOGIST
0185 INGERSOLL I.ANE
stLT, coLoHADO 81652
ooo) 8?&51@ Pl HOUFS)
April 18, L?c]3
F-i.rlly !3r-ainerd ..'-
I'iortr.r Archi tecte
145 Esst l"lesdar.r Drive
Cr-r:ssroadli af- Vai I
.Vai I, CU gt657
liE: S.x\,o!, Vi I I as
Dear $al lyr
I havr,r reviewr:d the sit-e of the re{e:-enced prcjecf.. as shnr{n onttre srccfinrpanyirrq rnap {or FuFpose$i o{ $acl.; F.rll r.evier.l {flr the
lnr.rrr oi' V,aj L " Tlre northern f r:ur uni tffii qih
Rtlc!,:{.rll. Zcrn* d'.re t.o the outcropping o.f Eand,stfine on the other!iid* r:f the Lion'* RitJttre Loop, The ge*ccnrJ tien o.t r-rnits ig nmtin f.he-r h.:llat-tl ':c-lne"
Tirig i6 in,a Ioc$'hion r.,rlr er e the i*idqe, cont*i ni nr-J the enrrrc+: nil'potentierl .$al1irrq roi:kti, ic at a 1or,.t Level r,rith rhsFrj{t {:o thej;i tr:f" t--u r 1: r-r:c!qg iiln i.Fl;r'ch f- tr r+. northern.-ri t.es, 1'lru r-m*i'.:r, r.r i. L !
l'r;rve 'r,: iqlli f ir:*rri t'rr-r*tr'{y so t}rart Oiti:ggl;iqx__!dl-1__E_,t* nei:es*i-;}r-v.
['l;l:r1. r-lnr:i:;rh.l rl rtrt:kg rJEr:Ll]- .ahovp thi s pr-mpoged dt?vel DI]rnen{--Fut
th*,. l.*i:r: ;-o;rl. wi L l rat.ch sorne a.f thelrn" . The haiard lncreaselr tothe r.rr:.Eit wliere the ridge become:i hiqher,. therehy irrpartirrE.flir-.,Fe.lli.rrertic energy tcr polentiaL .falling rocl.:a.
tr I propose Fieveral alternative:l tn surb,sf_an'Li,"i11,1r 6linimi:re the
haze.rd {rorn f aI.l inq:.yar.1'o.. A f our .f oot. hieh ber.m .rnary-.be . .'
LL,t|:|LiLl!-LL:!Jrdlt.J|lL.,L||q,9,c}t.IEner,tEeg.
l i1 1r:i inay not tri.? aI I clt,JEro Elecause rt m.3y intei-f eFE! r.Ji tl"l thF rctadriqht r:{ rt!;iy. Another. step trhich. can be .taken ib to desicln the
{rqf! {nnrth fiide} of eatrh o{ these {uur r-tnits t$-a ctr€n of;rt 1e;rsl:oLlnd5.FF Bquare ora east f our 'f eFt at {3\,e
nt!i t-aC Iilthat roCEsr' cannot ciffi the-ffitil ourci'ri l. eLrg!, ne*r rn.ey. guggest'tfr energy absorbing 'f acino such aglrgr; tr: protect the br-ittIe concrete... I{ possribl.e" bpJfr Df the--e
iefr_gfE EhoLrlr:' De u'tili.zed, especi"tty
is *r.
'f el.it't high rtith the sama stren h qiven above. Thic r.lall corlld
i-l i Eo r.trl 1 pl ace argE.(S fponat.ure o{ the ha?,ard Bnd thethat f i.n,:rl pLans be revier'red
bgulders. Fecause r:{ the{or mitigation.' I surggsst
Enqir1€*er and mt3 (or nthe::
options
hy. yourr
lrJ
Th
14, i.
ffi
Lt li
cmnE't'-rt-leti dn , o{any o.t the prt]pogeft olitinot i. ncl-eage e haesrd to her property or strircterrds*t^i.ry, . br-ti I di ngs, roaii6@
e|5 or fa gE o.f any l.rind.F arLr qlreetione please contact me ? e!:Fieci al 1..,r duri rrgpri: I i mi nary conceptual isations"
1* ,. v ir- JW\
Nli rhol as Lanp i. ri s
llc,nsul t i. rrg tlaol oi.;i st
atioh
i.
JamesStress ?08-581-9395tt?+1:''c;.+
I €i C Properties
;une 8, 199,
l"lr. Tln DevllnClty of VatIPlanner of Property
755 So. Fronta6e R{oVallr Colorado- 81617
Dear t{tr. DsvLln;
As ownels of unit 22Q3 at Slmba Run, ue strongly opof $Ja}ld. and Slnbaland Corp. to deveLoo the land aof WaI1d, and Stnbaland Corp. to deveLop the Ian$ a
Slmba Ruir on the edne of sectlon I and 2r It wLIlSlnba Ruir on the edge of seEtlon I and 2. It wLIlthe valus of, our property; by deetroylng bhe vLewnajor part of the vaLue of our unlt,e.naJor part of the vaLue of our unlt,6r
Thle pl-an was put into
homsowners asaoclatlonnot awaro at ther" tlme
A naJor eelling polnt
Thatrs vhat convXnced
We therefore request that the pLane of Walldbe denled becau6e of the flnanilaL lmpact onunlt ownere at Slnba Run.
Cord1ally;
Jwer/cp
eff,ect in l99or bEfore the control
was turned over to the honeowners.
of, purchaee that thls had occtrr€dr
i
i
I
ee th,e plans
acent: to
verl.y tmpaet
eh l.e the
i
;
br trre
llle were
;
Slmba Runr le the vtsw.
and Sinbal"and Corpr
the value of bany
:
i
po
dJ
5e
hl"wh
4018 Deertrail Hill
of, aII the unlte at
us to purchaseo
i
?-3gr.e3e5
streEs
Barringlon, lllinois 6A0rc
JLJNr--Eg-1993 15:Es FROI,I
CS3)
4?!-3427 Trl t4'79245? P. E1
FAX T0: Tlm Devlln 3a3/4?9-?rt72Planner of Community pfoperty for City of Vail755 S. Fronf.ege Rnad vall, CO, gld57
I sppose the plans of l.,a.t lc Setd and Sinba Land
CorporetJ.on fnr development of l6nd next to $imbe Run.
I o'rn a unit in Simba Run and feel the Flanned new build_
ings on the edge ot the present ttro buil,dings wlll have
I distSnet edvefse effect on sight llnes end values of
o.wnF!s ln the present buiJ.dtngs.
Plans fot tne ner developr.',ent, use of lanC now apart ol present simba Run and a tle ln with,the facllltles
of Slnba Run Nrere put lnto effect tn.l 990 before j
pruchased my unit. I was not iold of thcse plans anc!
at present many homeoflners are silll not aware of the
ne,r plans.
I feel there has been obfuscatlon and disregard foi
thc rtghts of others irr Llris proposed plan that sho,Jld
noi be alloued tc, contlnu"+._4il{*
F P Of'(P. I
aluna 8, 1993
MR. TI}I DEVLIN
etty rtf VATI,
Planner of PtoPerfY
?55 S- Prnntege RC.Vall , Colorado 81657
Dear Hr. Devllnr
We are oryners of *1425 at Slmba Fun Condonlnlum and wc strongly
opFos. tlre ptene o! walld andl slnhrland eorb. to builal a nev
project nelghborlnS rrith our bulldlngF.
ThiE rllll have a very at'rorrE lmpaet on tha value of, our
propcrti+c. tt v{11 nob only dletroy tho wlow but definifery
loner thelr prices
Because lre dld not know about tb at the tilne of purchace we
fequeet that Yor deny Wa1l.d drtd Sintbdldtr'J CoL-p. plan6
to bulld ln thls locatlon.Thle project vould bavE a negatlve lnf].uence on tlru vdtut'
of all unite in Slrdba Run.
#fi" /foa"{
llarla f. Blonlarz
8440 N. Cllfton lve.Nllea' I1,1. 60714
tel. (708) 696-0925
,o
mc,D Jut I
Eric Beringause
1497 Shoreline Dr.lfayzata, I.lN 55391(H) 6L2-476-8672(o) 414-695-3331
Mr. Uichael l.lollicaAssistant Director of Planning
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Rd.VaiL, co 81657
Dear Mike:
As per my conversation ritb you, as rell as a previous conversationwith Jin Morter, the architect for Sinba Run, I wor:Ld strongl-y urgethe Town of Vail to try to work out the inclusion of a publicpedestrian walkway through the new Sinba Run developnent. As the
owner of two separate properties in the Sandstone area I can attestto the current frequency of use of that land as a pedestrian
walkway. When the I70 underpass is finalLy constructed a pedestrian
walkway through Simba would save at least a quarter mlle walk forpeople living directty above Sinba (casolar Dr., Vail view Dr,etc.. . ) and encourage people to walk to the Cascade VillageChalrlift, which is currently underutillzed.
I believe the new Sinba construction will be quite attractive andis well thought out and eonmend the Planning Group on a job welldone. I hope the Town of Vail can figure out how to include apublic walkway in those plans.
m5
Sincerelv,
€'* ,fudn --'Bric Beringause
FII. T OOPY
use only. He said that dormers could be added on the south and west end ol lhe
building. He added that he would like to see them address the parking issue
somehow.
Greg Amsden stated that he would like to see the upper (fifth) floor removed from the
design. -[he west end may be able to increase in height but all other roof fidges must
stay the same. Dormers must be pulled back.
Diana Donovan suggested that the applicant use the ndead spaceo in the building to
redevelop. The key is to use the interior space. She commented that redevelopment
does not have to be bigger.
Bill Anderson stated that if the applicant could address all of Jeff Bowen's concems, he
may be able lo approve the proposal.
Jim Lamont stated that he would like to see lhe existing building areas converted
without breaking out of the existing building envelope.
George Lamb commenled that the building is simply moved out in respect to zoning.
Kathy Langenwalter said that it was important that the north side eave line should be
maintained for pedeslrian scale.
Michael Barclay said that he appreciated the boards' comments and that he would like
to bring this item back lo another worksession with a revised proposal.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the PEC generally liked the buildings as it currently is
and that she would not suggest that the applicant change the overall design.
Diana Donovan stated that the dormers should be created to access the "dead space"
of the building, not to create additional rooms.
7. A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
That part of the First Supplemenlal Map lor Simba Run Condominium, aocordlng to lhs map thereol
recorded in the otrice oi the Eagls County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorcier, d€scribed as lollows:
Beglnning al th€ mosl southwgsl€rly corner of said map, lhEhcg ths lollowing thre€ eoureeg along tha
westerly linEE of said map; l) NO3o33'01'E 160.79 {eet; 2) N12c50'3lll"E 144.72leeli 3) N17"56'03'70.60
feet; ihence, departlng said westerly lins, Sl3o16'03'W 157.26 feet. thence S76"41'57'E 91.50 teel; thence
N13".|6'03"E 35.00 feet; thenco S76"43'57'872,31 feet 1o thE easterly lin€ of said map; thence $e following
two coursss along the easerly and southeasterly lines of said map; 1) S24'4457'E 52.3S leet; 2)
S52'5O29'VV 272,50leet to th€ Poinl ot Begiming, containing 0.6134 acres, mors or less; and
That pai of Simba Run, according to the map thereot, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in lhe Otfic€ of
he Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, d€scribod as {ollows:
Plannlng and Envlronmental Commlsslon
June 28, 1993
Beginning at the most sor.rtherly com6r of eaid Simba Run, thence th€ foltswtng four courses along th€
southwesterly and northwesterly lines of said Simba Run; 1) N37"09'3t W z$.eg feel; Z) 3g4.SZ feet along
th€ arc ot a cu|vo to the lefi, havlng a radius ol 1771.95 fesl, a c€r$Ial angle of 10049'06", and a chord thal
beats N42"13?0'E 334.07 feet 3) N36%8'48' E 20r.36 f€et; 4) 15.96 feet along the arc ot a curye to the
righl, having a radius ol 428.02 leet, a central angle ol O2.O8'12', and a chord that bears N37r52'54" E.|5.96 feet to e comer on thE westerv boundary of ihe First Supplemental Map lor Simba Run
Condomrnium, accoroing to the map lhereol recorcied in the oliics ol th€ Eagle Counly, Coiorado, Clerk and
Recorden thenco lh€ following four courses abng said rre3terv boundary; 1) S21.51'28'W 69,90leet; 2)
S17'56'03'W 181.17 feet; 3) S12"5033nV U4.72leet:4) 503033'01'W .|60,79 teet to the southeast€rty lln€
o{ said Simba Run; thenca, along EaH sorrth€asl€rly lina, S52o50'2S"W 113.08 le6t io th€ Polnt of
Beglnning, containing 1,560 acr$, mo,E or less,
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land Corporation/Walid Said
Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a brief presentation per the statf memo and pointed out that there
were two corections to the zoning Analysis section of the memo on Page 4. These
corrections pertained to the enclosed parking percentages.
Kathy Langenwalter inquired whether the height of the proposed buildings would be
higher than the buildings already in existence. She said that lhere are currently
buildings lhat exceed lhe allowable development standard of 45 feet.
Jim Morter, the architect for the project, stated that none of the proposed buildings
would be higher than what is already in existence.
Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see the lower access road moved so that
the existing trees can be replanted immediately when they are removed for
construction.
Mike Mollica showed the PEC where slaff would like to see additional planting on the
site. He suggested the final landscaping review be conducted by the Design Review
Board.
Jim Morter stated that he did not want the last paragraph on Page 11 of the staff
memo, to preclude fuiure development, to be a condition of approval.
Kathy Langenwalter asked staff whether the PEC could modify their recommendation
for approval such that the remaining density would be "no more than one additional
Type C dwelling unit consisting of 1,602 square feet (with a garage credit) to be
located at the east end of the lower bench townhomes in this development plan."
Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see a bike and pedestrian path
constructed on the site.
Jeff Bowen made a motlon per th€ staff memo to recommend approval of this request
for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the remaining
portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas per the staff memo with the modification
Plannlng and Envko nmental Commlsglon
June 28, 1993
thal "no more than one additionat Type C dwelling unit conslsting of 1'602
Equare feet (with a garage credit) be located al the east end of the lower bench
townhomes in this development plan." Greg Amsden seconded this motion and a
5-0'1 vote approved this request with Bill Anderson abstaining due to a potential
conflict of interest
S. Discussion of restrictions pertaining to development in areas having 40% or greater
slope.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica gave a brief overview of the staff memo and stated that the sta{f feels that
the variance process is the best way to address development in areas having 40% or
greater slope.
There was general discussion amongst the PEC and the linal PEC consensus was
agreement with the staff recommendation to not modily the Code at this time.
9. Discussion of wall height standards for slopes greater than 30%.
Planner: Tim Devlin
Tim Devlin reiterated what Mike Mollica had said in the previous item, that the staff
feels that lhe variance process is the best way to address the wall height standards for
slopes greater than 30%.
Greg Amsden commented that it was his feeling that it was positive that staff and PEC
had some control over lhe wall height standards in such areas.
10. A request to review the Management Plan and Master Plan for the Vail Cemetery to be
located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located wesl of lhe Glen Lyon
subdivision and southeast of the Matlerhom neighborhood.
Applicant: ' Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO JULY 12, 1993
Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this request untilJuly 12, 1993 with Greg Amsden
seconding this request. A 6-0 vote tabled this item until July 12, 1993.
11. A request for a height variance, a density variance, a landscape variance and a major
exterior alteration of the L'Ostello Condorninium Building located at 705 West
Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead 4th Filing.
Applicant L'Ostello CondominiumsPlannen Shelly Mello TABLED TO JULY 12,1993
Plannlng and Envlronmentrl Commt$lon
JunE 28, 1993
t
I
I
l
t
0
.I{lt
ll
l
q
s
$
ti
rl' It / t-/
u
@9.
o
,,?(o
l1
llt
F
li
't
I
tt
I&t\
lli
ilF
lF
Ir
lr
lz
jinii\
r l/f-->---
ii.'i-,,*.-l .. ;,,
I
I,
I
I'
F
q
1
1"W't
I
'ffi
ir
Savoy Villas
tgrd{ O.Y.rot|n..a lhllC
vrll. Colo3.do
-tt-ts"
'
i
I!
tt
-L-l
=
l^j'
r{Fr'
,"t*
\-''o Q. o
' O O \16-- rr,,i,..r-.,r!!,? -\ rD.ar rr t-tatooo\
:- ---\ ---<-:;&i,-.-
| ,,"
| -.-/| ,L/ u?ec* Lz\a--
t4rld va't!./,--v?. 1"1
UNITTYPE..'A'
l[
IF
H
F
cz{
!nl
ED
!,
lulo.
F't
z:l
JJ
q'
!i
ll't'I
.,l! E
Fli 5II:)tl
$ll .l
--t J
tl
.Il_''I
Ju1. 26 '93 Ot !.?AX515l l:*r: ec
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D,
col{litli TlNG (iEOi0OlSl
C1C5 INGFRIiOI L LANE
slLl. coLoFADc 8165?'
,003 B?6.1,1c0 ?d r{ou:rsl
,tuly 33r l??&
3rl ly FrrtnrrdnHrter ArchitGctt
143 Etrt nrritoh DrtvrCrorsrordr rt VrlIvall, 6O 816$7
REt Brvoy Vill*t
Drrr 9ellyr
I hevr rtviilued thE sttc Firn drtfd iluly lE. t??F. whieh you hrv:rrcontly BGht, for mittgetion o+ thf rott +rtl hrlard et th,slte. Thir plan ltavsc very littlr rhf,ncr o{ anr cf thrbulldingr, inclHeJnE grr.glr, batnH hlt by rolling rockr.
lllth tho hcrm6 in Ftracb fri you hrvc dafinccl thgn. vrry fre{ rockrcrn rrtch thl unltE, rnd thr nitiEitton *lll mduer thr drngrr. tothe public hEfiIth rnd se{nty or ta proparty to e rlaronablrlEvtl r rnd that auch mttlsrtton d6tt nst incrurr thr hrrrFct t6other prpprrty or ltructr,rrsri or te publtc bulldlnger pordr,ttrrttrr rlg[!g*g{-rcv, €aremanti, utlllt{g or *rctttt,irc. IfthFre trF still clusctton6 contsct rnr-
SRUr
o
Y?,,,, v :. /, L.,4 f*ftn,
Nicholer lSrnpirtrCsnrulting Brologlrt
I
.'l<lgl'
slr
EF.
tl,tq-vtv-
I
il
"#-
\i:,'!
-.'l \
I
't.\*,t
LC 81 !8 t6, 9e 'tnr.r ir.fHgTgi(ulNu5 6Eaa
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
P.O. BOX 2
srLT, coLoRADO 81652
P.tu'0iul'i ?s1995,
(3031 876.5400 (24 HOURSI
.lune 18, l??3
Sally Frainerd
Morter Architects
143 East l'leadow DriveCrossroads at ValIVail, CO 81&57
REr s"voy virtaE p ffi fittt"t'lt. t
Dear Sally:
I have reviewed the site plan whitrh ytru have recently sent, aeper oLrr discussions, for mitigation of the roqk fall hazard atthe slte. You have addreEsed my concerns very well and only remeof the garage areas remain sornewhat unprotetrted.
Ntth the bermE ln plece aE you have defined thernr very few rockecan reach the units, ande because the {ronts of rnoEt of thoseunits are in the form of garageg, I am not eoncerned that danagecan occlir to living quartere. I{ there are still questionscontact rne.
.Itir
=ffi"fui,8
Consqlting Geologist
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
Usted belo,v is the zoning analysis for Develooment Area B, located in SDD #5 (Phase I includes the hrc existing Simba Run
buildings). Please note that SDD #5 has no underlying zoning, as it was annexed into hs Town in December of 1975 and the
original SDD was establish€d during March of 1976.
Site Ar€a:
Setbad<s:
Height
GFFA:
Units:
Employee
Dvu€lling Unib:
"Sio Coverage:
"lrn&ceting:
*Parldng:
APPROVEO OEV.
STANDARDS
6.3 aor€s274,428 39. fL
20' - al perinobr
propeny fit€g
45'
.|29,000 sq. ft - DU's
lO,0@ sq. ft. - EHU'3
lgg,mo 69. ft
139
10 (mh.)
54,886 sq. ft. (a'%)
164,657 rc ft. (50%)
8515 endoGod
(of ]sqrtu€d pa*ing)
PHASE I
OEV. AHEA B
4.7 ac|ss/2oJt,7B2 sq. ft.
20' - all pedmeFr
prop€rry fines
20- @'
90,807 6q. ft.
4,ff)l sq. fL
95,408 sq. ft.
95
6
65,089 sq. tt. (3296)
*'110,22 sq. fr. (54%)
128 snclos€d (S%l
6 surhcs
194
-$
REMA|Nltrlc DEV.
POTENTIAL AF1ER
PHASE I COilST.
1.6 acres
N/A
N/A
38,l$l sq. ft.
5.399 eo. fr.
43,592 sg. ft.
14
4
<10,203 sq. fl.>
N/A
N/A
l.l/A
PH,ISE tl
DA'. AREA B
l.G .crrC69,t00 ..F fL
20' . .ll porhn lG
proparly lln.r
?5-ag'
32,28i1 rq, t
a5||6tq. ft.
tL,8l8 .q. ft
1e
a
'r7t48 |q. ft (269a)
82,92{ !q. fr. ({7t5l
12 rnclorad (5O96)
2t urfuoc
IOTAL
DEV. AREA B
6.8 ecros
N/A
lrl/A
123,{ne sq. [. - OUt
_zl:[!Z!LL- €Hu'B
19r,226 sg. h
l'lrl
t0
'82,935 sq. n. (g'%)
'*143,@6 6q. ft. {52t96)
l5O onalos€d (el%)
28 surlace
Commer<ial Alge: -$
{8 {{tl rprc6 .rc r.qd|rq 178 ('182 tpso6 Ere propos€d)
{1. +
O
' lndud€G 1,292 sqlsrs ieet cf Trmber Ridgo's eaem-nrcBi buildng.
" Ihe propcod proi€ct departa fiom fice approved develognont Gbndards.-' hdud€6 5,530 aqare bet of hndscaping which would be mmwed frcm h€ Phaso I pop€rty to aeomrlodab ft€ divoway b he lrwq bendr dewloprneil d Phaso ll.
IV. CR|TERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUANNG THIS PROPOSAL
As stated ln the zoning cods, the purpose ol spedal development dhtricls ls to:
'... en@urage flexibility and cr€alivity in the developrnsnt of lard in odor to
promote lb most appropdata use; to lmprove the design character ad quality
ol new dwelopment wihin the torvn; to ladlitato lhe dequab and economical
prwision ol sbEets and utilites; to pres8rvg tha natural and scenic featurss of
open spaoe areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated
in the Vail Comprehenslve Plan. An approved der/elopmant plan for a epecial
development district, in conjunction urih a property's underlylng zone dlstric't,
shall estaiblish the requlremenb for gukling development and rses of propedy
indudsd in the special <bvalopment district.'
The following are the nlne special development district criteria to b€ utlized by the Planning
and Environmential Commission whsn avaluating SDD proposals:
A. Deslgn co_mpatlblllty and sensltlvlty to the |mmedliab envlronment,
nelghborhood and adfacent prcpertles Flatlve to archlEctural deslgn,
scale, bulk, bulldlng helght, buffer zones, ldentlty, chalEcter, ylsual
lnFgrlty and orlentatlon.
The original design plan for the final phase of the Simba Run development proposed
one large building on this Phase ll site. This building was designed b bo similar to the
existing Simba buildirgs located immediately to the eirct. These buiklings are
approximately 260 fset in length and approxlmately 50 feet in width. The poled was
designed to take access off of Llonsridge Loop (one curb cut) witr a faidy large surface
parking €trea, as well as one level of underground (structured) parking.
The cunent proposal before the PEC suggests a series of six smaller buildings.
Access is divided between the North Frontage Hoad and Lionsrldge Loop, and the
parking lor he proiect is almost equally divkled between enclosed parking ard surface
parking. Architecturally, the design is very similar to that of the exlsting Simba Run
project, although smaller in scale.
The four condominium buildings proposed on the northem or upper bench of this site,
are in kee$ng wih the multi-family characbr of the neighborhood, with eadr building
consisting of four dwelling units. The employee building to the east also consisb of
four dwelling unib. The lower bench of this sib is deslgned to accommodab three
attached townhomes, also meeting the multi-family definidon.
The stafi believes that the applicant has done a reasonaHe Job wifi the overall site
plannlng of the project to insure fie project moets this criterion. We feel that the mass
of he proposed buildings cr€ates a transition from he existing $imba Run buildings to
the east, which are upwards of 50 feet in height, and the existing Tirber Rlige
buildings to the west, which ar approximately 30 feet in helght. The apprcved
development standard for bulldlng helght wlthln SDD #5 ls.l5 fEet. The et#f
does ]€cognlze that three ol the unlts whlch are proposed lo be locatgd on the
upper bench of the development would exoeed rl5 feet. Speclflcally, the three
eastern-most unlts on the upper bench would exceed the maxlmum helght. The
proposed helghts would range from 46 fcet to 49 feet. lt should b€ noted that
the maxlmum bulldlng helghts were measured trom exbtlng grEde, whlch
happens to be the morc Estrlctlve than the llnal grad$. The flnat grades for the
Frolect, would pul the rldge helghts et approxlmatety tl4 feet. lt shoutd also be
noted thet the pevlously apprcved bulldlng for thls slte had a bultdtng helght of
apprcxhately 60 feet at aome polnts.
B. Use3, actlvlty and denslty whlch proylde a compailble, efflclent and
wgrxable relatlonshlp wlth surroundlng u3e3 end actlvlty.
It is the staff's position that the proposed residential use on the site ls compatible with
the existing uses on surrounding properties. The proposed density (numbers of units)
is also compatible with adjacent propenies and would be in conformance with tre High
Density Residential kJontification that the Town of Vail Land Use Plan has placed on
this property. The proposal meets the technical definition of a multi-family project. We
also believe it is positive that four employee housing units are incorporated into the
development,
The staff would also like to point out that with the approval and construction of this final
phase of the Simba Run proJect, Development Area B would be under the approved
density (number of units) and GRFA. The project would be under the approved
density by twen$-five dwelling unib, and under the maximum allowable GRFA (DU's
ard EHU's) by 8,774 square feet. The staff feels thal it is not sound ptanning to leave
this type of remaining density on the books without an approved development plan.
For this reason, staff is recommending that should this finaldevelopment proposal be
approved, that the remaining number of dwelling units and GRFA be reduced to zero
for the entire Development Area B.
C. Compllance wlth the parklng and loadlng rEqulrements as outllned In
chapter 18.52.
The Town's parking requirements indicate that a total of 44 parking spaces are
required for this Phase ll site. The applicant has proposed a tohl of ,t8 parking
spaoes for lhe proiect. The ratio of enclosed versus surface parking spaces lor this
Phase is approximately a fifty-fifty split, although he overall enclosed parking
percsntage for the gg!!g Development Area B is &47", which is less than the required
85%. Please see he Zoning Analysis on Page 3 of this memorandum for the specific
numbers.
Each individual phase of this project has been designed to meet the Town's parking
requirements.
D.
t.
Conformlty wlth appllcable element3 of O|e Vall Compretenslve Plan,
Town pollclee ancl Urban Deslgn Plians.
The Town of Vail Lerd Use Plan klentifies this area as High Densfi ResldenUal
(HDR). High Density Reslclential is delined in the land Use Plan as follou,s:
The housing in lhis category would typically
consist ol multi-floored struc{ures wih densities
excesding lifteen dwelling unlts per buildable acre.
Other activilies in this category would indude
pltuab recreational facilities, and private parking
facilities and institutionaUpublic uses such as
cfiurches, tire stiations and pa*s and open space
facllltles.'
The proposed pan lor the final phase of Simba Run wou6 sat the overall
density lor Development Arsa B at 19.7 dwelling unitsy'acre. This figure
includes he employee housing units.
The following are the applicable Land Use Plan goals and policies which relate
to trls proposal:
Goal1.1 Vail shouH continue to grow in a controlled environment,
maintainirp a balance between residential, commerchl and
recreational uses to serve both the visitor ard pemanent
resident.
Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in
existing developed areas (infill areas).
Additional residential grorth should continue to occur primarily in
existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where
high hazards do not exist.
Affordable employee housing should be mde available hrough
private efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the
Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions.
Hesidentialgrorh should keep paco wlth the ma*et pace
demands for a full range of housing types.
The exbting employee housing base shoukt be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing nesds shouH be
accommodated at varied sltes throughout the community.
Goal5.3
Goal1.12
Goal5.1
Goal5.4
Goal5.5
The staff believes the project ls in compliance with the Town's Land Use Plan.
E. ldenttflcatlon and mltlgstlon of natural and/or geologlc hazards that affect
lhe property on whlch the spectat devetopment dlstrtct ls prcposad.
This project slle is located wilhin a high severity rockfall hazard zone. The applicant's
geologist, Nicholas lampiris, has reviewed the proposed site plan and has agreed that
the bermang along Lionsridge Loop Road (south side), combined with intemal mitigation
tor the two eastem-most buildings, is sufficient to mitigate tre rocklall hazard. Please
see the attached letlers from Nicholas Lampirls at the end of this memorandum.
F. Slte plan, bulldlng deslgn and tocaflon and open cpace provtstons
deslgned to produc€ a functlonal development |esponslve and 3enstilye
to natural features, yegetatlon and overall aeslhetlc quallty of the
communlty.
The staff believes fiat the applicant has been responsive to the PEC'S suggestions
regarding minor modifications to the site plan. We believe that fie changes made to
the building locations have resulted in maintaining adequate distances between the
Phase ll proieet and the existing Simba Run building. The proisct wouH continue to
exceed the 20olo maximum site coverage lor the gg!!19 Development Area B, however,
the staff believes that the overallsite planning for the project is acceptaUe and that he
proposed 30o/" site coverage is reasonable given the approved density. All ol the
building locations have been sited to take advantage of views both to the east and to
the west. The site plan has also been modified lo accommodate tho needs of tlre Vail
Fire Department.
Since the original PEC worksession, fre applicant has modified the upper bench of the
development and has eliminated all parking within the required 2o-foot front setback
area. One ol the three proposed curb cuts off of Lionsridge Loop has also been
eliminated. The stafi believes that all of these changes are positive changes and
result in a higher quality project which will further enhance ib compatibility with the
immediate neighborhood.
G. A clrculatlon system deslgned for both vehlcles and pedestrlans
addresslng on and off-slte trafflc clrculatlon.
Site PlanA/ehicular Access (GDOT access permit).
Access to he lower bench of this siF, to the three 'townhouse-type' units, is proposed
via the existing Simba Run curb-cut off of he North Frontage Road. Access to the
units on the northern or upper bench of this site ls designed as a series of two curb
cub otf of Lionsridge Loop Road. Due to he change in use, a Colorado Department
of Transportation access permit will be required before a building permit can be
released for the three units that take access off the North Frontage Road.
Future Simba Undeoass.
As discussed in the recently adopbd Vail Transporhtion Master Plan, the consfuction
of an l-70 underpass in the vicinity of Simba Run, is proposed as a first fiority
recommendation for boh the West Vail interdtange and he Main Vail Interohange
improvements. The underpass woukl be oonstruct€d lmmedlately opposite the lower
bench development. To accommodate he undepass, it would be necessary to lowsr
the Nodh Frontags Hoad approximately 13 b 15 feet in this area The applicant has
submitted a regrading plan which Indicates the regrding whlch would be rucessary to
accomrnodate the future l-70 undepass. lt appears hat the applicanfs propoeed
design woukl not be in conllict with tfie future undepass, and the Town Engineer has
approved he aocess and regrading plans.
Pedestdan Accoss.
The staff has requested hat fte applicant pursue the posshility of locafq a public
pedestrian path through he property so trat pedestdan aooess can be maintained from
the Lionsddge loop ar6a doyvn to the North Frontage Road. We beligve that frls
pedestrian acogss would become even more criticalshould the proposed Sirnba
underpass be constuc{ed. The applicant has agreed Utat such a public easement
through the property would make good planning sense, however, fre applicant is
concemed about the potential liability and maintenancs issues sunounding a public
pedestrian path. The applicant has agreed to consider adding a pedestrian connection
through the property should the Town Attornoy be able to provids them with a level of
comfort regarding the liability concems.
H. Functlonal and ssthetlc landscaplng and open space In order to optlmlze
and prcserve natural features, rcceatlon, vlewg and functlons,
At the suggestion of the Planning and Environmental Commisslon, tre applicant has
modified fie proposed landscaping plan to include larger evergreen trses (12 - 15 feet
in height) al the base of the upper development area. Additional landscaping has been
provided throughout he sib, however, the proiect as a whole (for the gl!49
Development Area B) does not meet the required 607o minimum landscaped area.
The staff has thoroughly reviewed the applicant's proposed landscaps plan for the
project, and we leel comfortable with the proposed 52olo lotal landscaped area for the
entire Development Area B, The staff would point out that given the denslty of this
site, hg property could be compared with the standard HDMF zoning, which wouH
require a minimum ol30% landscaped area.
overall, staff believes that the landscaping plan generally provides adequate screening
and green space throughout the site. We would recommend, however, that he
applicant consider additional screen plantings in the berm alorq Lion's RHge loop
Road.
For safety re€Fons, the existing recr8ationbike path has been realigned so that it
crosses the vehicular accsss to ths lower development area at the ddveway's
intersection with he property line.
l. Phaslng phn or ssbdlylslon plan that wtll malntaln a wotkablq functlonal
rnd elflclent nilatlonshlp throughout the datelqment ol the specbl
development dtstrlct
Since he Inltlal PEC wotk session, he applicant has modlfied the proleefs phasing
plan. Phase lwould now onsist ot the two condominium bulldings located on the
northwest comsr of the sita. This would consist of a total of a[ht dvrnlling units.
Phase ll wouH indtde the rcmalnlng two buildirgs in the upper devslognent area and
the erployee building. The final phase of the project would mmlst of frte three
tilrnhomes located on the brvsr bencfi ol the pmpery. Th6 staft beliews that fre
applicants rpc$ficatons to $o phasirg plan ar€ nou, accsptabte.
V. STAFFRECOMilENDANON
The stalf is Fcommending apprcval of lhe applicanfs rsqusst for a maior npdlfication to
Special Development Districil No. 5. We believe that the modifications whicfi have been made
to the project, slnco the initial PEG work session, have brought the proiect into compliance
with the nine Special Development Disttict review criteria listed in this memorandum.
Wih regard lo the developmsnt standards as lndicated in he Zoning Analysis section of this
memorandum, the staff does acknowledge that the proiect is over on site coverage and
bulldlng helght ard ls under on the required enclosed parking percentage and minimum
landscaping percsntage. With regard to sitE coverags, the Phase I developrnent on this site
(the exisling Simba Run buildings) has already exceeded the 206 maximum site coverage by
l8/c, ot 10,203 square feet. We think that fre total site coverage proposed, 3{P/o, iS
reasonable given the high density residential nature of this project. As a point of comparison,
should this pr@eny have been zoned High Density Multi-Family, the maximum allowaue site
coverage, aeo|ding to cunenl Town of Vail aonirg, would be 55%. The statf finds that the
proposed 30% site covorage and he overall site plan design is reasonable. We also belleve
that the prcposed bulldlng holghts are reasonable glven the exlstlng grades on the slte
and glyen the helght ot the Slmba Run Phase I bu[dtngs.
Although the applicant has not met the required 85% enclosed parking percentage for fre
entire Developm€nt Area B, the staff does flnd hat the applicant has designed the proiect with
all of the surface parking located on the north side of fie buildings, and that tre proposed
82ol" enclosed parking is reasonable. Again, we would point out that if the property had been
zoned High Density Multi-Family, the required enclosed Frking percentago would be 75%.
As indicated in Secdon lV, H, of his staff memorandum, the apflicant has not mat fte
required 600/" minimum landscape percentiage for the entire Derrelopment Area B. Alter
careful analysis of the proposed landscaping plan for the property, tho staff beliews hat &e
overall sib planning and landscapirtg plan for $is site is reasonable. We would also point out
that if the property had been zoned High Density MultFFamily, which would bo conshtsnt with
the density on thls slte, the required landscapirq percentage would be 30%.
ln summary, the staff is re@mmending approval with th€ understanding that &e applicant
agraes with tha following conditlons, and we believe the proiect substantially complies with the
nine SDD review criteria as lndicat€d in this memorandum. The corditions are as follorvs:
10
a
1. The Town shall not issue a Temporary Certificate ol Occupancy for any of the
Phase ll condominiume until sucfr timo as TCO's have been issued for allfour
unib in the amfloyee housing building.
2. The applicant agrees thd if the liability lssues conceming fie construction and
mainbnanco of a prblic pedestdan path/easemant hrough he property can be
reeolved wlth the Town Attorney, the applicant shall construct a pedestdan path
and grant a public access easement to the Town of Vail.
3. A Colorado Department of Transportation access permit shall be granted prior
to the issuance of any building or grading permits for the lower bench of the
dorelopment (three townhomes).
4. The applicant agrees to permanently rsstrict the lour employee houslrq units as
Type lll' EHU's, according to he Tonn's adopted housing ordinance.
5. That the applicant add additional screen plantings in the berm along Lion's
RiSe Loop Road, and also between the North Frontage Road and the bike
path, subject to the review and approval ol the Design Review Board.
In addition to the above, he staff recommsndation for approval is contingant upon tho
applicant agreeing to reduce the remaining density (number of units and GRFA) tor the gll1g
Development Area B to zero. It this qJnent development proposal is approved, the staff
believes that it is not appropriate to allow exoess development rights to exist for this propsrty,
wifrout an approved development plan.
clp€c\memG\slmba.6Ag
11
,.F I Frtr coPY
A request for a variance to allow a deck to encroach into a setback for a residence
located at Lot 14, Bighom 2nd Filing/3876 Lupine Drive.
Applicants:
Planner:
Eric and Susan Sipf
Andy KnudtsenlMike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a brief presentation per the staff memo and stated that staff is
recommending approval of the requested variance with the condition that the applicant
add plantings on the east side of their residence to help screen the deck from the
neighboring property.
Harry Gray, the applicant's representative, stated they were unaware that the deck had
encroached into the side setback until an lmprovement Location Certificate was done.
Diana Donovan made a motion to approve this request for a variance lo allow a deck to
encroach into a setback perthe staff memo, with Jeff Bowen seconding the motion. A 6-0
vole approved this request.
A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion ol the S$tba Run SDD, $avoy Villas, located at 1100 Notih Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
That part of the First Supplemental Map for Simba Run Condominium, according to the map lhereol recorded
in lhe of{ic6 ot the Eagl€ County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as lollows:
Eeginning at the most soulhwesterly comer of said map, thence the following three courses along the westerly
lines ol said map; 1) NO3'33'01"E 1€0,79 teet; 2) N12050 3SE 144.72ieei;3) N17'56 03' 70.60 feel; thence,
departing said westerly line, 513'16'03"W 15/.26 feet, lhence S76%3'57'E 91.50 feet; lhence N13ol6'03"E
35.00 feet; thence S76o43'57"E 72.31 feet 1o the eastsrly line ol said map; thence the following lwo courses
afong the easterly and southeasterly lines of said map; 1) S24o,rt4'57"E 52.38 feet; 2) S52"50'29'W 272.50 leel
to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
That part of Simba Run, according to the map thereof, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in the Oftice of the
Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning al the mosl southerly comer ol said Simba Bun, thence the lollowing {our courses along the
southwesterly and northwe€terly lines ol said Simba Run; 1) N37"09'31"W 233.28 {eett 2) 334.57 feet along the
arc of a curve to the lett, having a radius ot 1771.95 feet, a cenlral angle of 10%9'06", and a chord that bears
N42"13'20"E 334.07 feet; 3) N36o48'48' E 201.36 feet; 4) 15.96 feel along the arc of a curve to the right, having
a radius ot 428.02 feet, central angle of 02o08''l2", and a chod thai beafs N37o5254" E 15.96 teet to a corner
on the westerly boundary of the First Supplemental Map lor Simba Run Condominium, according 10 the map
thereof recorded in the office of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder; thence the following four
courses along said westerly boundary; 1) S21"51?8"W 69.90 feet; 2) S17"56'03"W 1 81.17 feet; 3) 512'50'33"W
144.72 teeti 4) S03o33'01"W 160.79 fset to the southeaslerly line of said Simba Flun; thence, along said
southeasterly line, 352"50 29'W 113.09 teet to the Point ol Beginning, conlaining 1.560 acles, mors or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land GorporationMalid Said
Mlke Mollica
Planning and Environmental Commission
July 26, 1993
2.
J.
'F
Mike Moltica made a presentation per the staff memo and stated that this item had been
approved by the Town Council on first reading and that it was subsequently discovered
that the Simba Run Condominium Association had not been formally notified. He added
that the Council has rescinded its approval of the ordinance for this major amendment and
that the Simba Run Condominium Association has now been properly notified for this
meeting. He stated that staff was recommending two additional conditions of approval
(see Page 1 of the staff memo).
Jim Morter stated that there were two minor changes to the site plan that the PEC had
previously approved which included a pedestrian walkway and additional berming to allow
rockfall protection. He previously stated that Jay Peterson would address the issue of
employee housing.
Jay Peterson stated that the applicant had a concem regarding the pedestrian
easemenVwalkway and that he wanted clarification from the PEC as to what the approval
consisted of.
The PEC stated that tlre applicant would be responsible for paying for and constructing
the pedestdan walkway.
Conceming the employee housing unlts, Jay Peterson stated that he felt that the condition
imposed by Town Council, concerning the deed restriction of the six employee units, (that
were an earlier part of the Simba Run SDD) was not reasonable.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the PEC had discussed this earlier, and that they felt
comfortable with their original recommendation that the four @ units would be
permanently deed restricted. She said that they would recommend that Town Council
pursue the restriction for the other existing six units.
Jeff Bowen stated that he agreed with Kathy's comments. He said that philosophically,
when the remaining ten year period was up, there would be six less employee housing
units than there were previously.
Dalton Williams stated that he agreed with Jeff's comments. He said that he was under
the impression that it used to be that deed restrictions had a tvventy year maximum".
Allison Lassoe stated that she agreed with Jeff's and Dalton's comments.
Greg Amsden stated that he agreed with Jeff's, Dalton's and Allison's comments but he
felt that the PEC should only focus on the currently proposed employee housing units.
Diana Donovan stated that she agreed with Jeff Bowen's comments.
Diana Donovan made a motion to approve this request for a major amendment to SDD
#5 to allow for the development ol the remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy
Villas, perthe staff memo. Jeff Bowen seconded the motion and a 6-0 vote approved this
Planning and Environmental Commlssion
July 26, 1993
4.
request.
The PEC asked staff to pass on to Council that they supported the Council's efforts to
permanently restrict the six existing employee housing units.
A request for a worksession for the establishment of a Special Development District to
allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and
more specifically described as follows:
A parcel of land in Tract B, Vail Village, Fkst Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more panicularly
descr'rbed as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Tracl B; lhence N 79"46'00' W along the Northerly line of Vail
Village, Fkst Fiting, and along the Northerly linE of said Tfact B 622.86 teet; thence S 06'26'52'W a distance
ol 321€i.83 feet to the Southwegt corn€r of that parcel ol land d€scribed in Book 191 at Pag€ 139 as recorded
January 10, .|966 and filed in Reception No. 102978 in lhs Eagle County Records, said corner also being the
True Point ol Beginning; lhence S 79o04'08' E and along the Soutl"rerly line of said parcel 20O.O0 feet to the
Southeast corner lhereot; thence N 62"52'00' E and along the Northerly line of that parcel ol land described in
Book 222 al Pag6 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle Counly Records, a distance o{ 66.78 teet to the
Northeasterly corner of said parcet o{ hnd; said comer being on the Westerly rightct-way line of Gore Creek
Boad, as pfatted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27o13'37'W a distancg ot 77.37 feet along said Westerly
right-o{-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89"29'22" W a distance of 12.80 feet to thE Northeastedy corner
ol that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10, 1966 and filed in Feception
No. 102978 in the Eagle C,ounty Records; thence Northweslerly 26.51 leet along the arc ot a 37.50 feet radius
curv€ to the lett having a central angle ot 40030'00" whose chord bears N 53"40'00" W a distance ot 25.96 te€t
to a point of tangency; thence N 73'55'00'W and ahng said tangent 166.44 feet; thence N s5'10'21" W a
distance o{ 50.40leei to the Northwesterly comer of the Mounlain Haus Parcel; thonce S 02"1800" W and along
the easterly line ol said Mountain Haus Parcel a distance ol 100.00 feet to ths Southeasterly comer thereof;
thence S 45"13'53' E a distance of 38,70 feet to the True Point of Beginning, containing 30,486 square feet,
more or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Vail Athletic Club
Shelly Mello
Shelly Mello made a brief presentation per the staff memo and stated that her
presentation would focus on the changes that had been made to the proposed Vail
Athletic Club expansion since the worksession with the PEC and DRB on June 28, 1993.
Stan Cope stated that they were trying to create a hotel. He said that the proposed fifth
floor would consist of loft bedrooms. He stated that he would like to see this property
become a small hotel concentrating on suites. He said that they have decreased the
dwelling units in order to increase the combination accommodation units. He stated that
their goal was to have forty-nine accommodation units. He stated that the modifications
that they had made were an attempt to address the concerns that the PEC members had
from the June 28, 1993 worksession.
Kathy Langenwalter stated to the PEC members that she would like them to comment on
whether the SDD process was appropriate for the proiect.
Planning and Environmental Commission
July 26, 1993
- ?tua -6
=: \;fu
t ':-
tn$I-
t/ok: (o- 6
a
Ft[ t coPy
JULY20,1993
7:30 P.M.
A regular- meeting of the vail Town council was held on Tuesday, Jury 20, lgg3, in theCouncil Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. rn" *""ti"e r#s caled to order at 7:4oP.M.
MINUTES
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
MEMBER"S PRESENT:Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor
Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
Jim Shearer
Tom Steinberg (arrived at g:80 p.M.)
ffi iifttr",arrived
at 8:80 p.M.
TOWN OFFICIALS pRESEI{I: Larry Grafel, Acting Town Manager
Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney
The first item on the agenda was Citizen Par[icipation. Blondie Vucich expressed conce,'.about the increase of pet waste in public places -anil the difficulty with enforcing 1OGordinance reqyiring pet owners to ilean up and drspose of the# animal's waste. Sheintroduced and demonstrated a "user-friendly''product called "pet Fick-Up";;. sir" "*pr.i""Jthis product provided 13 9asy, sanitary, arrordabte, una "o"i.oo-e"i"urt"rpo"rrui";;f;;pet owners to pick up their pet's waste. She suggested placing these devices i" pof5" pru"u*to provide pet owners with an easy oppontunity to clean .tp. Sie felt fines paid by individualsticketed for choosing not to cle-an lti *rt"" their pets *oua u" o"* way to create a revenue
:9:rrce f9r TOV to pay for the devices on a long-term basis. Ms. Vucich noted the ;;"J;fthis product in Boulder, and indicated Eagle C6unty Animal Control had express *1ri"s"".,to endorse-use of the product. Ms. Vucich ad.vised she *odJ ;;;;iy further informatin toLarry Grafel for Todd Oppenheimer,s review.
Item No' 2 was Ordi"llce No. 16, Series of 1993, second. reading, an ordinance repealing andreenacting ordinance No. 2g, series of lg77 , ordinance No. BB, Series of 1gzg, *.i o;dfi;;;No. 24, Series of 1986; an ordinance amending Special Developnent District No. b and.prwiding for a dev,elopment plan and its contents; permitted, conditional and acce.tow ur*;development stanilards, recreation amenities tax,'and othei special provisions; and settingfo-rth djtails in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full.'AJter U"ief aiscussi;-r\Merv Lapin moved t'o rescind action taken on Ordinance No. 16, Series of lgg3, on firsireading. Bob Buddey seconded tJre motion. A vote was taken and the motion p""r"Junanimously, 4-0. Merv Lapin t'hen moved Lo refer Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1g9'B backto the-Planning and Environmental Commission (pEC) for reconsid.eration, Bob Buckleyseconded the motion. A vote was taken and that motion also passed. r,nanimously, 4-0.
Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. b, Series of 1g98, second. reading, an prrtinsnqs a-endingchapter 16.04, and sections 16.12.010, 16.20.010 ,L6.zg.zza,ro.zzlbro, io.zz.too, 16.26.010;16'20'015, and 76.22.0L4 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code to provide for the p""l"Uitl*iof neon signs and exterior gas filled, ilrrminated and fiber optic sig.rs, *a p.o"ia"sregulations regarding the review of all other gas flIled, illuminatei and fi-beropti"
"igor, uoiinterior accent lighting; and providing details in regard therebo. Mayor osteifoss ieai thetitle in full. I(ristan Pritz requested Council table this ordinance to August B, 1g98. MervLapin moved to table ordinance No. b, series of Lgg3, second reading, to August B, 1gg3.Bob Buckley seconded the motion. After brief discussion, a vote was taken and the motionpassed unanimously, 40.
Item No. 4 was ordinance No. LB, series of 1g98, first reading, an ordinance emendingParagraphs 16.32.0g0(F) and 16.82.040(A) of the Municipal CoiL of the Town of Vuli, tipmvide for the termination of any non-conforming sign five years alter the effective date ofany amendment to the Sign Code Ordinance, and sltting forth drt"it* in regard theretoMayor Osterfoss read the title in full. I{ristan Pritz reque-sted Council tabie tiis errtin6nssuuiil August 3, 1993' Merv Lapin moved to table Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1998, to August3' 1993' with a second from Bob Buckley. A vote was taken and the -otioo paised
unanimously, 4-0.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
ruESDAY, JULY 20,lggt
7:30 P.ll.lN TOV COUNCIL CHAilBEBS
EXPANDED AGENDA
730 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
735 P'M. 2. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing
Mike Mollica and reenacting Ordinance No.29, Series of 1977, Ordinance No.33, Series
Tom Moorhead of 1978, and Ordinance No.24, Series of 1986; an ordinance amending
Special Development District No. 5 and providing for a development plan
and its contenb; permitted, conditional and accessory uses; development
standards, recreation amenities hx, and other special provisions; and
setting torth details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Stafl requests a motion to rescind action
taken on July 6, 1993, when Councilapproved Ordinance No. 16, Series
of 1993, on first reading. lf rescinded, then shff requests a motion to refer
issue to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) lor
A | . reconsideration.t tt*-*"- -rt -,-"('d"f;;,li. -"'""*: rhe condominium Association was not siven' t t | lt --=- formal notice of the scheduled hearings.rl ,.!j)/=---
/.), j, . ttr-? , Staff Recommendation: Make a motion to rescind action taken onAn t /^,/ .* FF ''- ' Ordinance No. 16- Series of 1Q93 on first rcarlinn and than e m^ti^n t !
) - - ^-/r , !i!€.r I r.ErrirrrrrrrgttuEltrlJtt. tvtat\g tI I
'tt .l-, "(r*/- /* f F '' ' Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993, on first reading, and tren a motion to
'"1/ / .I-O _----/ reler issue to the PEC lor reconsideration.
7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No.5, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance amending
Kristan PriE Chapter 16.04, and Sections 16.12.010, 16.20.010, 16.2A.220,16.22.010,
Tom Moorhead 16,22.160, 16.26.010, 16.20.015, and 1622.014 of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code to provide for the prohibition of neon signs and exterior gas
filled, illuminated and fib€r optic signs, and providing regulations regarding
the reyiew of all other gas filled, illuminated and tiber optic signs, and
interior accent lighting; and providing details in regard thereto.
Action Reouested ol Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 5,
Series of 1993, on second reading.
8:10 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance amending
Kristan PriE Paragraphs 16.32.030(F) and 16.32.040(A) of the Municipal Code ot the
Tom Moorhead Town of Vail, to provide for the termination of any non-conforming sign five
years after the effective date of any arnendment to the Sign Code
Ordinance, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approveideny/modify Ordinance No. 13,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
8:30 P.M. 5. Ordinance No.6, Series of 1993, firstreading, an ordinance amending Title
Tim Devlin 12 - Streets and Sidewalks of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, by
Tom Moorhead the addition of Chapter 12.16 - Revocable Right of Way Permits, and
o
8:55 P.M. 6.
9:15 P.M. 7.
Mike Mollica
Tom Moorhead
9:45 P.M.
setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Town of Vail.
Action Requested of Goundl: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 6,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backoround Rationale: Council had direcEd staff to review the existing
Revocable Right of Way process and asked for an ordinance to be created
that would serve both the private and public needs by providing funding on
TOV land for improvements re@mmended by the TOV Streetscape Plan,
the TOV Village Master Plan, and the Uonshead Urban Deslgn Guide Plan.
Council reviewed the draft ordinance at the June 22, 1993, Work Session
and made no changes. Please nob that the Mill Creek Court Building
representative, Mark Matfiews, has indicated that he would like to include
the design and labor costs in the amortized costs of the project, as well as
construction @sts.
Statf Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1993, on first
reading.
Resolution No. 8, Series of 1993, a resolution establishing support of the
Vail Tolvn Council for Plan "C" of the Vail Valley Performance and
Conlerence Center, submitting at the Regular Municipal Election a new tal(
on restauranb and bars and lodgings, and expressing the intention of the
Town of Vail to commit funds toward the construction of the Center.
Appeal of a PEC decision to not allow the removal of a dwelling unit in fie
A & D Building/286 Bridge StreeVLob A-D/Block 5A, Vail Village First Filing.
Appellant: Vail Associates, Inc. represented by Jack Hunn.
Action Requested of Council: UpholcUoverturn/modify the PEC decision.
Backoround Rationale: The PEC voted 4-1-1 to not allow the request.
Please see the PEC memo to Council in this packet.
Adjournment.
aoaoaaa
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,7lz7lsl3, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. tN Tov coul{ctl OHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SES'SION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY,8l3tg3, BEGINN|NG AT 2:00 P.M. tN Tov couNctL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEENNG
wlLL BE oN TuEsDAY,SlggS, BEG|NN|NG AT 7:30 P.M. tN Tov couNctl cHAltBERs.
C:UGENDA.TCE
aaaaaoa
List of Neighboring Properties
SAVOY VILLAS
nffD JUL o i003t
1. Simba Run Resort
Simba Run Owner's Association
c/o Don Hancock
1100 North Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
2. Timber Ridge Apartments
Mark lV Realty
400 North Franklin
Chicago, lL 60640
3. Vail Run Resort
Vail Run Ownership Association
1000 Lionsridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
4. Telemark Townhouses
Marika Brofus, president
Telemark Townhouses Association
1083 Lionsridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
5. Casolar
Greg Hampton, President
1175-B Casolar Del Norte Drive
Vail, CO 81657 c\\
'1 le F3 - GcUacL r'trs Sl-r{- cr,.} \-/
6. Snow Fox Gondominiums
Snow Fox Owner's Association
#_.1!';;|'""dsReatty i6 003
Vail, co Blose qmJUl
7. Breakaway West
Breakaway West Association
Box 5940
Avon, CO 81620
8. Golorado Department of Transportation
Box 298
Eagle, CO 81631
9. Lot G4, Lionsridge Filing 2
Stewart H. Brown
Box 2359
Vail, CO 81658
A Prolessiona Corporat on
143 East lleadow Drive
Crossroads at Vai
Vail, Colorado € 1657
303/476 5105
MonTTRARCHITECTS
Letter of Transmittal
- f$ST JuL s i99l'
Date:
To:
July 8, 1993
Tim Devlin
Town of Vail Community Development
Savoy VillasProject
Please find enclosed the lollowinq:
7t8t93
Remarks:
of
List of Neighboring properties
Set of Addressed, stamped envelopes for notification
Tim - We would like to officially re-submit for a amendment to
S.D.D. #5, to be on the agenda for the Planning Commission on
July 26, 1993.
We are assuming that our previously-discussed schedule, which
puts us on the Town Council agenda for a first reading on August
3, a second reading on August 17, and final DRB approval on
August 18 is correct.
ally qrarner
Project Architect
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTV
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of lhe Town of
Vail wiil hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
tbe Town of Vailon July 26, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A clarification of the subdivision process regarding payment of la(es.
Planner: Mike Mollica
2. A request for a minor amendment to SDD #4, Cascade Village for the Waterford
parcels in area A, described as follows:
Th€t pan ol lhe gw 1/4 NE t/4. sFction 12, Township 5 $outh, FangB 8l wbsl ol lhe sixth Principsl Meddlan, Town ol vail, €agl|€ county.
Colorado. dgscdbgd as loll€nfls:
geginning at a poinl on the soutieiy dght of-lyay line ol Inbrslal6 Highway No. 70 wfiencs 6n imn pln wtth a pasfio csp ma*ing flE eenier of
isid Section !2 bear6 g 33'10'19'W 1447,09leet; fian66 along srjd Eoulhsaly rigill-ot"Hay line t s coufs6s
r) N 52'50'29' E 229.66 1e6t
2) N 74'3S'1r E 160.70 feet:
thenc€ dopaniog €aid routherly rightd-way lffi N gSr45'57' E 138,93 l€ol ttl€nce S .lCP45'14'W 94.32 leet lhence S 18o 18'38'W g,08le€q
:theffe S 01.21'36'W 205.02ieet thsnc€ S 1297'36'W 110.25le6l; lhence S 2S?g'96'W 164.48ieet lh€nc€ N 40 '17'04' W 211.16 bet
thenc€N4904!'56'E97.80teet;lhenceN97.09'31'W95.59|s€qt|)enceS52"5029'Wg5.l0belthence69.49lo$tabngth€arcolanor-
tangenl curvs !c th€ let havlng a ladus ot 65.00 feel, I cerkal angle of 6t'14'4a' and a chord fial bears N 58e 65'f'9' W 66.22 le6t thsnca N
€7'09'31' W 1 18.50 le€t Ta The True Potnt ot 8€ginning, Coufity ot Eagh' Siate ol Colorado;
Applicanl MECM Enterprises represented by Eustaquio Cortina and. CommercialFederal Savings.Planner $helly Mello
3. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow an expansion to a residential unit at
the Fled Liorllots E, F, G and H, Block 5-A, Vail Village 1st Filing/304 Bridge Street.
Applicant Aagje NoursePlanner: Jim Curnutte
4. A request for a modification to the csnditional use for the snow dump to allow an
expansion of the road located at 1309 Vail Valley Drivelan unplatted parcel located
west ol the Town of Vail shops.
Applicant Town of VailPlannec Andy Knudtsen
5. A request for a variance to allow a deck to encroach into a setback for a residence
located at Lot 14, Bighom 2nd Filing/3876 Lupine Drive.
Applicants: Eric and Susan SipfPlannen Andy Knudtsen
6. A request to amend the development plan for the Gold Peak Base lo allow a building
for reslrooms and locker roorns located at Tracl F, Vail Village Sth Filingl45S Vail
Valley Drive.
7. A request for a joint worksession with the Planning and Environmental Commission
and the Design Review Board for the establishment of a Special Development District
to allow the expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive,
and more specifically described as follows:
A parce{ ot land in Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colo.ado, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the Northea$t corner ot said Traci B; ihence N 79'46'00" W along the Northerly line ol Vail
Village, Fhst Fiting, and along the Nonherly line ot said Tract B 622.86 feet; thence S 06"26'52" W a
distance of 348.93 leet to the Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in Book 191 at Page 139 as
iecorded January 10, 1966 and tiled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle C,ounty Records, $aid corner also
being the Tnre Point ot Beginning; thence S 79004'08" E and along the Sodhefiy line of sald parcel e00.00
feet to the Southeast comer thereof; thence N 62"52'00. E and along the Northerhl l,n€ of that parcel of land
described in Eook 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle County Records, a distance of 66.78
i€et to the Norlheasterly corner ol said parcel of land; said corner being on the Weslerly rightof-way line ot
Gore Creek Road, as platted in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27"13'37" W a dislance of 77.37 teet
along said Westerly right*f.way line ot Gore Creek Road; thence N 89029'22" W a distance of 12.80 taet to
the North€ast€rly colner ol that parcel of land deseribed in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10,
1S66 and tilod in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagl€ County Recordq thence Norlhweslerly 26.51 teet along
the arc of a 37.50 {eet radius curve to the lefi having a central angle ot 40030'00" whose chord bears N
53'40'00" W a distance of 25.95 leel to a point of tangency; thence N 73055'00" W and along said tangsnt
166.44 f6et; thence N 85"t0'21' W a distance of 50.40 teet to the Northw€sterly corner oi ihe Mountain
Haus Parcel; thenc€ S 02"18'00'W and along the easlerly line ol said Mountain Haus Parcel a disiance ot
100,00 feet to the Soulheasterly comer thereo{; thence S 45olg'53' E a distance ol 38.70 ieet to the True
Point ol Beginning, containing 30,486 iquare feet, more or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
vail Associates, Inc., represenled by Tim Kehoe
Tim Devlin
Vail Athletic Club
Shelly Mello
VailAssociates, Inc.
Tim Devlin
8.
o
A request {or a major exterior alleration to allow for a retail expan$ion at the Sunbird
Lodge, located at 675 Lionshead Place/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Srd Filing.
A request for lhe establishment of an SDD to allow the redervelopment of the Conrice
Building and a request for a conditional use pernit to allow the construction of three
Type tV e{nployee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically
described as {ollows:
A part of Traet '8" and a part ot Mill Creek Boad, Vait Village, Firrt Filing, County of Eagle, State of
Cohrado, moro partlcuhrly described as tollows:
Commencing at the Norlhea6t corner of Vail Village, Fkst Filing; thenc€ North 79'4€'00" Wesi along tho
$outharly line of U.S. Highway N6. 6 a distance of 367.06 t6et to thg Northsast com6r of said Tract '8";
thencs South 10014'00'West along the Easterly line o{ said Tract "B'; a distance oi 198.31 leet lo the
-1
Southeaslerly corner of said Tract "8"; thence North 79'46'00" West along th€ Southerly line of said Tract
'B' a distance of 100.00 {eet to the true point ol beginning thence Norlh 09'10'07' We$t a distance ol 41.67
feet; thence South 88'27'11" West a distance of 75.21 f6et; thence South 27"13'37" East a distance ot
77.37 leel: thence North 5'l"24'00" Easl a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less to the true point ol beginning.
10. A request for a conditional use permit and a landscape variance to allow an expansion
of the Vail Associates vehicle maintenance shop located at the NW 1/4 NW 1/4
Section 7 and the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 6, Township 5 South Range 80 W of the
60th P.M./t/ail Associates.
Applicant:
Plannen
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Plannen
David Smith
Jim Curnutte
VailAssociates
Jim Curnutte
Simba Land CorporationMalld Said
Mike Mollica
*"
A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
That pari of the First Supplemenlal Map lor Simba Run Condominium, accorcting to the map thereof
recorded in the ofiice of the Eagle Counly, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, describ€d as follows:
Beginning at the most southwesterly oorner ol said map, thence ihe following three courses along the
westerly lines ot said map; 1) NO3'33'01'E 160.79 fest; 2) Nl2450'33"E 144.72Ieeti 3) N17"56'03'70.60
teet; thence, departing said westedy line, Sl3'.|5'03"W 157.26 te€t, thsnc€ S76o4il'57"E 91.50 feet; thence
N13'16'03"E 35.00 feet; lhence S76o43'57'E 72.31 feet to the east€rly line ol said map; thence lhe tollowing
two coulses along the easterly and southeasterly lines ol said map; 1) S24o44'57'E 52,38 leeu 2)
S52"50?9"W 272.50 teet to the Point ot Beginning, contaiFing 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
That part ot Simba Run, according to th6 map thereof, rec,orded in Baok 312 al Page 763 in the Office of
the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as tollows:
Beginning at the most south€rly comer ot said Simba Run, thence the following four courses along the
southwesterly and nodhwesterly lines ol said Sinba Run; 1) N37"09'3t"W 233.28 teet; 2) 334.57 feet along
the arc of a curv€ to lhe lett, having a radius of 171.95 feet, a central angle of 10049'05", and a chord that
bears N42o13'20"E 334.07 feet; 3) N36'4S'48' E 201.36 teet; 4) 15.96 feet along the arc of a curve to the
right, having a radius of 428.02 feet, a central angle of 02408'12', and a chord that bears N37"52'54" E
15.96 fegt to a comer on the westerly boundary ot th6 Firsl Supplem€ntal Map lor Simba Run
Condominium, according to the map thereal racorded in th€ office of the Eagle Counly, Colorado, Clerk and
Becorder; thence the lollowing lour courses along said westerly boundary; 1) S21o51'28"W 69.90 feet; 2)
317"56'03'W 181.171e4t; 3) S12"50'33'W 144.72teeli 4) S03"33'01"W 160.79 fe€t to the southeasterly line
of said Simba Ruru thenc€, along said southeasterly line, S52'50'29"W 113.09 teet to the Point ol
Beginning, containing 1.560 acres, more ot less.
tl cflr
inspection fee in the amount of $S.oo per permit; and providing details in regard thereto.
!4erv Lapin moved to approve ordinancgNo. lb, series of t5ga, on first iading, withdirection to staff to darify that the elevator and dumbwaiter iospection fees were annial, notper inspectioo. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the *otioopassed unanimously, 7-0.
Item No. 10 was Ordinance No. 16, Seriee of 1.998, first reading, an ordinance repealing an4reenacting ordinance No. 29, series of 1g??, ordinance No. B3,Beries of 1g?g,
"rrd
o"diiuo**No.2!r series of 1986; anordinance a'nendingspecialDevelopmentDistrict(sDD)No, E andproviding for a development plan aad its contents; permitte4 conditional and ""*gsory "rur;development standards, recreation amenities tax,-and other special provisions; and settingforthdetails in regard thereto. The applicant was Walid Said, Simba iana Corporation. BoiBuckley stepped down due to conllict of interest. Tim Devlin explaioed this ordinance was
a request for a major au,endment to SDD No. 5 and would supersede all previous ordinancesand amendments that were presently in place for SDD No. -S. this or&oarrce would allow!r tle development of the rgmaining phase of the Simba Run sDD. The planning andEnvironmental Commission (PEC) recommended approval of the applicaof. requestif* *
mafior ameudment to SDD No. b, and allowed for onell) additional uoit *itl total GRFA of1602 square feet to be added to the project in the future. The pmject introduction,
dgscriptiol ofthe reques_t, zoning analysis, criteria to be used in evaluatiug this proposal, siteplans and architectural ilrawings prepared by Morter Architects, co.respooa"n.r ho-consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris, and letiers of opposition to ihe prolect from FrankN. Clark, James Stress, and Maria I. Bloniarz, ovrners of units at simba Rirn, we"e pa11 or
llfpo*Tyqty Development Department (CDD) memo to the pEC dated June Zg, f gS^8. Th*cDD staffbelieved the proposed project substantially complied with the nine (s) dnn reviewcriteria and recommended-approval of the project with five (b) conditions of approval asdetailed in the above referenced cDD memo to the pEC. At the time ihe cDD'srecommendation went to the PEC, the applicant had been in agreement with the
recommendation and conditions of approval. However, Tim said the applicant uow wantedto address Counsil about condition of approval number four which woutd require him topermanently restrict thefour (4) employee housing units (EHUg) in this phase of the project
as Type III EHU8, according to TO\ts adopted housing ordinance. Therd were presentfsix(6)n}IUs already in existence, and those origiDal six (6) EHUg had twenty year limited ter:ms
as EHUo. The twenty year terms were due to expire in 2008.
Jim Morter, architect for the propoeed project, stat€d 15is qldinaDce was an amendmeut to
an appmved SDD. He briefly discussed points of the originally approved. SDD and noied the
proposed project now consisted of 19 units instead of the rU tha:t were approved and hadbuilding permits. Mr. Morter also stated that the preseot proposed GRI'A was 34,800 square
feet inatead of a possible 43,600 square feet, more parking than required was pianned, andthe required ten (10) EHUg were being provided. M;. Morbef noted there were two
ordinances and a letter of agreement which addreesed the six (6) existing EHUg. Each of the
ordinances limited the duration of the six (6) existing EHUs to twenty (20) years. Mr. Morter
stated that the condition of approval requiring permanent restriciion of the foo" (4) newO$ps @A s[pped by him the first time he saq the CDD staff memo to the PEC on the day
of the PEC meeting. The applicant wanted all ten (10) EHUs limited to twenty (20) years.
Merv Lapin stated he wanted all ten (10) units permanently restricted as ftpe III EHUg.Tom Steinberg agreed. Merv stated he thoughfMr. Morter would find this-Council fairly
ademant about EHU requirements. There was some discussion about other projects whicirhad EHU terms which had now expired, and many of those units were now going to non-
eeplgyee use' Mayor Osterfoss etated there were very few options available 6r U;taing of
affordable housing, and felt Mr. Morter wru aware oi that from his own experience. {" aresult, the -need to permanently deed restrict all available EHUg had i**o-" a very
consistent theme, She asked Larry Eekwith for input on changing restrictions on EHUg that
had-already been given twenty year limitations.- Larry nskwilh indicated that since theapplicant had asked this pDD be amended, the applicant opeued their situation up to the
suggestion of restricting the oliler EHUs for perpetuity as well.
Mn Morter pointed. out, on behalf of his o\r'nern, that most of the units curnently being used
as EHU$ within the existing buildings were luxury condominiuns, two of whidwereimpty
because there were not enough employees in simba Run to fill them. He argued stro&l;
against deeding those six (6) units as permatrently restricted Tlpe III EHUg. Maior
Osterfoss did not think TOV had ever said these could only be- EHUs for one's owl
employees, There was a need for affordable housing thrcughout the community, and she
aeked the applicant if he could rent these units to other than their own euployees. Tim
ff#p y
'),b'?i
-
i6
Devlin pointed out that Section 9(B) of Orilinance No. L6, Series of lgg3 etated, 'A miniuumof ten (10) employee dwelling units shall be provided to-be leased to employees of Vail Run
94 to permanent residents employed in the Gore VaIIey." There was . did""t"* of opi*o"as to whether or not what the applicant was charging for rental of his units ** ilOt",concern.
Tin Devlin discussed the apqlicants request to reserve the right to add one (1) additionalfree market unit at a future date. fim said th"r* was some di-spute concerning what couldbe lgilt on Eury area to E" "-""t of where the project was beinf iroposed now, [* n- "riJstaff was comfortable with the request, * *ur the PEC. ffe leferrea to a model availablebefore Council. Mr. Morter said there was line going through tn" p*j""t that provided theboundary for new development, and said there was *me qrrurtioo ". to*h*t corrld and couldnot be built on that line, but he said at some time in thJfuture the applicant *uy *"rrt tocome back for another amendment to the SDD to allow for one (1) more-unit if developmeniquestions could be resolved. Mayor Osterfoss asked. if there "r.* rtry conflict in the sifl planwith the proposed Simba Run-"nderpass. She recalled Mr. Morter said during the site visiithere was not. Tim confi::med that.
Tom-. Steinberg asked what the underlying zoning on this was. I(rietan Pritz said the CDDstaff did not know what the underlying zoning was. She said it was similar to Cascadevillage. she referred to the zoning analysis o.rlage 4 of cDD's June zg, 1gg3, memo to thePEC noting this parcel was annexed into the Town in December, 19?b, and the'original SDDwas established in March, 1976, when zoning was created for it. She-said as far is numberof units and density, it-would compare most closely to High Oensity Multi-f,amly tffOUnl,but that was not an official underlying zone disti'ict. d- "sma, as presented, how thisproject exceeded HDMF. {1"!"t said they would have to go through tL" ^e*o "t a hg.-"*that out, but she did not think it exceeded it in many *ulyu. n4"ti' Lapin referrea dtneApplove$ Development Standards listed in the CDD mlmo, and I(ristan said those were thestandards in the ordinance at that time. She said that was what had been used as aguideline, notingthe project was.in conpliance with the land use plan designation, althoughthere was no underlying zo$e district. There waa some discussi;n about-the project's si]'g
govelage' parking percentage for enclosed parking, landscaping, GRFA' number ofrinits, and.height.
Jim Gibson said he agreed with Merv l,apiu about pemanently deed restric[ing EHUs,however, in this case felt only the four(4) nHUs proposeilinPhase II shouldbe p*"i*"rttyrestricted. He felt the six (6) already in existence were part ofau ordinance, ind he felt ii
would- be unfair to go back and change that. Jim Shearer agreed. with that. He felts-omething already given should not be taken away. Rob L,eVine said that was his firstthought, too, but then explained rov was not looking to claoge this ordinance, the applicantwas. Although it was new development, it was all one sDD,-and when it 11larop.oed rrp byan amendment requeet, tJ:e whole sDD wae open for examination. Rob wal in rav& orpermanently deed restricting not only the four (AJ nHUe being propoeed now, but also the six(6) existing EHUs. Mayor Osterfoss asked if the numbi-of'units to te petn":r""itv
restricted for a project of this size would be ten (10). It was asked if there was a fomula fordetermining the number of EHUs required, but Kristan said it was difficult to calculate thatwithout the underlying zone district, because that was what was used to gauge overage. Theguidelines used did not work on this project.
Mr. Morter said his client acquired this property with certain understanding, i.e. theordinances already established restricting the-existing EHUs for twenty (20) years. fnewhole Sakeup f lhe qroposed development .as basedon certain rules that were in place.Jim Gibson told Mr. Morter that Couneil was not trying to ninimize his concerns, .oa futtit would discourage other people from coming forward to meLe improvements if they feltuncertain about Council3s interpretations of past agreements. Jim -Gibson
said a previous
Council in 1975 saw fit to pass an ordinance *ni.n g"" twenty (20) year limitations on thesix (6) existing EHUs at Simba Run, and he did not Gel the current Council ought to "nuttg"thaL
E"*! clark, owner of a "ry! al $imba Run, eaid he was preeent representing a very few ofthe other condo owners at Simba Run. He claimed most of the othir owners at Simba Runfid aot even know about this proposed project, having never been apprised.
Larry Eskwith stated he had reviewed the condominium declaration, and. the expandabledn-l{ations proposed allowed for the development of a portion of gmtrod ioto .dditional unitgwhich would then be brought into the condominiu- associado; Larrly did not think ihis
developer needed the permission of either the association or any of the condominium owners.
,.i!:.
wt1. -Ctark Lald thev were led to believe there might be a third building added to the twoexisting buildings when tb.ey purchased this property, but had been toli nothing .Uoui"r,easem€nt or plans for separate townhouse units-. Fie said that no one, not Mr. Said, theAssociation President, or the Manager for the Association, made information available to thecondo owners in the existing two buildings. Mr. Clark said he happened. tn be in Vaif nychance and was told about-the proposed project by a painter "'oti"g th"". Mr. Clark saiihe called the President of the llomeowners'Association and was toldiy him that dildilr;found out about it. Mr- Clark said that was in May, 1993. He felt the people *t o o.11 iti".*condos should be aware of the proposed changes. He said he had read ihm"gh th";;d;;available on this issue for the first time tunlght, and only that Jternoon in ttre managertoIfice had he seen the proposed new buildings for the first time. He said this was i bigchange from what he andother owners mightlave expe*ed, especiatly the access "ur"*"oiproposed. He said he had seeu nothing in writing abbut the pi.o"La'a"""lop;;"i ;tiJithere were too many unanswered qrl"stiorr*. }Ie felt the issue ehoulil be tabled until all thecondo owners were notified and had proper time in *ni"r to
"".poua.
Mayor Osterfoes said, ae Larry Eskwith had tried to explain earlier, TOV alial not involveitself in internal condominium assosiation regulationa.' Mr. Clark repeated his primary
3r+ne1t was that present unit owners had not been informed of the proposed p*j""i"oihad not had suitable tlme to respond. Mr. Clark said they pd;d to have
"tto"oevs 1go[into this situation for them' Mayor Osterfoss indicated that night be an appropriate courseof action, but that was not the issue at hand at this time.
There was further discuesion-and .grrlanation by Larry Eskwith about expandablecondominium declarations. He also indicated therae *i* r r"l*rdon by the declararrt to thedeveloper of an access easement across the condominium prqiuct. iarry said that easementwa1 leservgd virtually anywherre on the condominium project. Larry feli Mr. Cla"k ;;t h;;
1 right to bring an action, but Larry did not feel rbv coulil be-a juilge here t;"k; ;determination whether or 19t-rn some way the develope" *i"""p""*nted something to Mr.Clark' What Mt. Clark said they would lihe was time to makelveryone involved aware ofthis so they could have a chance to go over this more """.f"llt;d give their input.
Mr' Morter said he did not know why the building manager had not heard about thig. Mr.Morter said he was required by TOV to notify IU* "on"do-ioin- association as well asneishbgry whea a projects was submitted for rerilew. Mr. Morter suggested if Mr. Clark waenot notified, the mattpr.lhoul_{-be taken up with the building malagement, not Council,. because Mr. Morter said they did make reqnired uotifications. i{ristan pritz said the lettersof notification went out Apnl 22, 1993. Mr. Morter advised that TOV also publisheinotifrcation information in the paper.
Tom Steinberg questioned rockfall hazard at the proposed site. Mr. Morter advised there hadbeen communication with Nicholas Lo,npiris, Consutting C"ofogiJ,L"d Mr. Morter eaid hehad a letter from Mr. Lampiris statini he was tota$ satisfied with Morter e*ftit".ttsolutions to rockfall hazard €oncerns. Tom Steinberg asked Lar:ry Eskwith what TO\ps
labili-ty w1s for physical damage to_th_e garages, cats,
"rrd
possessio; becau*e nn".i"*pi"lrlJune 18, 1993, letter stated although he was not concerned- that damage could occur to li"i"gquarters,-some of the garages still remained unprotected, Tom wanted to know if TOV woulibe liable because all the property was not being protected. I-arry nskwitn did not feel TOVhad liabiliW,-but suggested lfu. Lampiris be asled for clarificaitio". L,.r"y felt because ofgovernmental irnmufly statues TOV was prcbably protected. Tom Steinberg suggested Mr.Morter ask Mr. Tcmpiris what he would recommend to totally eolve the berm breachproblem. Mr. Morter felt-the problem was solved, but Larry Eskwith agreed with Tom aboutthe garages- Ton felt !h9 reode who did not irmow taui" g*ue"s onignt ue hit by ;;ksshould be notified. Tom felt thiJpotentially dangerous situation shoulil d publici""a i" ro*uway to buyers.
Mayor Osterfosg asked if the walkway issue had been addressed. Iftistar said there was awalkway through the project,lhe question was whether it wonta Ue public or not O"u Jtfrecouditions of approval stated thal if the liability issrres concerniig the constructio" ,"amaintenance ofa public pedestrian path/easement through the proie*y could be resolvedwith the Town Attorney, the applicant would construct a peaestri'ar irrtU ""a
g"""t. p"ti-
access easement to the Town of Vail. Mr. Morter said the applicani was wi[Lg to diu;;;with the Town Attorney these !.!ittty issues as well as issues conceming thJ privacy of
P*.P19 who own the property and live ihere. Mayor Osterfoss said if an ottiu"p*"" *r" p"iin that area that was both pedestrian and vehicular, it would be designed to dr; p""d; 19its use, so it would make sense that there be a walkway coanected "itl it. 1'o- dt"iiL.e
eaid a walkway for- public use was very reasonable, particularly when considering accessi-mediately onto the interstate from the proposed pro5ect. lVIr. Morter agreed tf,at wasreasonable, but it was eq t elly reasonable foi the owuer not to asgume that h;bility. i" iJiL\eee were points yet to be negotiated. Mayor Ostedoss felt there should, be aaOtionaldiscussion of this issue !$4<ing i! would be good to try to work it out now instead of settingit aside as- a future negotiation. _Merv Lapin felt that was primarily a legal matter that couli,be worked out between now and second reading.
After furiher diecussion, Metv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1gg3, onfirst reading with the fiye (!) conditions of appmval as stated in the June zg, 1g9g, a'Dtmemo to the PEC with the change to condition #4 that the applicant agreed t" ir.*"it*"tfvrestric-t ten (10) Type III EHUg. He further instructed st ti to come to an agreement bysecond reading as to the possible access acroea the property and that the roclfal hazari
con@r:ns be firlly solved. Rob LeVine seconded the motion. -
Before a vote was taken, Tom Steinberg asked if this had gone to the Design Review Board(DRB) yet. Tim Devlin advised it would be going to a DRg Work Session ihe next day. Headded that Greg Hall wanted 3 $ralnase Jasement across the property. Tom steinbergencouraged the DRB to "overdo" the landscaping. Merv f,apin ad-ded these to his motion.
Rob LeVine askedf,arry Eskwith if he was comfortable with the notification process that tookplace. Larry said he would have to talk in more detail to stalf about the notification process,
and-if there ryas- a problem, there would have to be a renotifieation and another heari;g. Rd;LeVine asked if that would cause a problem passing thie ordinance on first reading. -I-*;
Eskwith said if Council passed it on fiust reading and there was an invalidity in thenotification, he thought it would have to go back to the PEC. He said this was a littl€different becauge the developer kept the rigtrt to develop additional units on a specific pieceof property. That was incorporated into the condo ieclaration that was recognized bywhoever b-rought that property that that was going to happen at some point in tt * f"t*u.Larry said that was fairly common procedure. Lar-y said L" *a"
"oo."irred and needed toreview the uotification procesa, and if the notification wae for aome reason inadequate, thenthe applicant would have to go back to the very beginning, th;"ci th. pEC and'back'up toCouncil.
Jim Gibson said he w9!_ coing to oppose the motion. He did not agree with requiringpermanent Type III EHU designation for all ten (10) units. Jim Shearer agreed wiiU.lii
Gibson.
A vote was taken and the_motion passed, 4-2-1, Jim Gibson aud Jim shearer opposed, BobBuckley abstaining. Bob Buckley then rejoined Council.
Item No. 11 was an appeal of a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) decision tonot allow the removal ola dwelling unit in the A & D Building/286 Bridge Street/Iots A-D/Block 5A, Vail Village First Filing. The appellant was Vail As;ociates, I;c. rep"esented by
{ry-k lt"t". Merv Lapia moved to table this appeal at the appellant'r requesi to July 2d,1993' with a gecond from Jim Shearer. A- vote was taken anil the motion pus"dplanineqsly, 6-1, Bob Buckley abstaining due to conflict of intereet.
There- being no further business, a motion was made to adjourn to Executive Sessionregarding personnel matterq wqs_made and passed unani*ously.- The meeting was a{ioumedto Executive Session at 11:40 p.M.
ilinuteo ukrn by Etbrianns S. Deb
c$fit{$,t L6.sl
Respectfully submitted,
Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
I I
;j,,,:,'/1,./r, t&,*l A*'fr't/ f'rvo,{
h, it(' fdl?rtt *#',W
f*/F^A- /'/ i *t/"'* q'/;'!{{
ln {r
*v&-rt1;{r",
Alntz*'{af 't'
lr*,A {s/*,A ' /drr,& 'n,',,' '!r,r/^ s rrfd:.r. .'(- .t!r,* a , / ,.?L
/r/e ,"*l ltt/ y'*al$a,c$ttt5 .,t:. t+e*b{tz {fne*/,
fuv /aa- /^o+ /'/*u f,*l ov'o'*""'#'
i,t*/** 1s &,,**s - i/r*i/ /-/ "*n^tt' **'**' e/ 4' no'sfi
u^.L ,^'/ 7d'/'"^ aPa*"*4
,ilr/;*' flerr'-(s '4f") / a"/'"y' /a a''ft'
,67.,* loylr -ZJ
fr*-/o*4 DzB- A *7t 4/ /*./r.*"n
rw-
4
/ att/t -
a
fD fna'ao{n-t'i'^
tl^ fr./* /ttf
lq ,0,J" /'o''
*,7 /**4.
/44,/r'rq/ 6.,/oJ { o')
t/U - Z rfo*, 4 .Atrt'tt++'rtca/ (r'u' d*"/2
|yu.,"a,n,trr" - W*/ t,,t, fu "V,, i^:,lul,*
{ll}* yr^L,""''"o'',.''1 "!7",'4i';}'1''l'*'
'N^,, $lJ,r "',j ilf/^ {^',1 nwy/r { nu /tn ,,1,r.*//:
I -'t t
JL (;'/',,r^- *4 fr'"-*.-/ -s/,r{ / Ao--. 7-q"os+./,
6 p','+l;, s.:*,,f i, /n// * :"1o,(
,,lrr- 3t:r't{.tlt-. ' '/
fr/ tn,l - *,,4 /a /u/*u7r,,r4/ *",/t.
bi) /r t'/ t J
/\1, lt' /'4.a!?nf { ftn,- l,tu o""u*fu| l-- a*,"/7
/.rlr.:t,,i /t.a ,-/,?^44 Zrt*-1 ""rt 4llla,tv
/*""# { /'4 *s/,,"4a
,/Ja(,"er.-'{-r,/?// 'h
,/ ,y' ,'t-/rto l""AA 7.t7
f'"1 ,1""- ,
1)4 t tl*,/
,*",t/ ,kt t'j:'/ ni :;t,,, "i,,('/xa1
/."6, nr'441//5
/-*/+.y' a,atzto
6r"t+o/t2u'7*
7!4'aj. *r a.f '
6,,&>
,
P
' tP on F. I
,Iune B , 1993
MR. fIM DEVLIIT
Clty nf TAT[.
Planner of Property
76E S- Frantrga Rd.
Vall ' Colorndo 81657
Dcar l.lr. Devllnl
We ar€ o1n€rs of *14U5 at glnrba Rua Csndonlnlum and rsc strongly
6pFor. thc plrns ot lta].ld and Slnhrlind eorD. to build a ne$
project nelghborin! vlth o$r bulldlngF.
ThtE $111 harre a very Btf,ohg llnPact on the velue of out
propcrll*t. tt vlll no! only atrtroy thc wlov but dcflndtrry
lover thetr prlcee
Because rc dld not lffiolr about lt at the time of purchase ve
requit? that You dsny ?talld and BlntDatand Csrlr' planE
to build l$ th16 loeatlon,'Inlf projeot $ouLd hevt I negat.lve lnfl,uencc 9rl tlttt vdr.uu
of e1t unite in Slnba Run.
Marla I. Bloniars
8440 N. Cllfton lvE.
Nllee, flI. 60714
teI. (708) 696-0925
?
',.]*.r*-,rr= 1s:s3 FRB'I
dEs)
421-3H,??TO 14792452 P.E1
'I
FAX T0: Tin DevlJn ,a3tL?g-?r!7?Plannex of Community property for Clty of Vail755 S. Frontnge nnao veti, cb, 81gsz
I oppose thc plans of Watto Seid and Slmba Land
Corporatlon for developmcnt of lirnd next to Slmbn Run.
I gnn a unlt in Slmba Run and feel the pLanned nen build_
lngs on the edge of the ptesent tro buildings nlll have
a d:.stinct edverse effact on sight lines and values of
n.wners 1n the preetnt buildtngc,
Flans for the ngx developtlentr us€ 0f Land now apart of present slnrba Run and I tie ln wlth.;the facllltiesof Slnba Fun scre put tnto effect in 1990 before I
pruchased my unlt. I was not teld of tt.rese plans anti
et present many homeoffners are still not eware nf the
new pIans.
I feel there has been obfuscetlon and disregard for
thc rtghts of others ln Llris prspssed plan that Should
4k-{/
CTARK
/,:0ef/4 */*y''#"**
,l^'( r /'*; s' ryfd 4 /a ruer{''#'
/-L # TM tfrrv /-s r'*o/o '/' 7 4
FRf,NK N.
JamesStress N0.708-381-9395
] {, C Properties
!,1r. Tln DevllnClty of ValL
Planner of Propsrty
755 Eo. ITotttag€ Rd.vallr Colorado- 81657
Dear l{ro Dovuni
A6 ownerBof Walld,
Slnba Ftunthe valueunJor part
llle therefore r€quest that the plane of Waltd and Slnbaland Corprbe denled besauee of the ftnancLaL lmpact on the value of, banyunLt ormere at sluba Run. ;
Cordtal,ly;
Jwe/cp
Iof unlt ?€:Q3 at Slnba Run, re strongly oppoBe th,e plans
and Slnbaland Corp. to develop the land adJasent: to
on bhe erlge of eection I and 2r ft sil.I severLy, lnpactof our propertfl by deetroylng the vLew shLch 1e, theof tbe ralue of, our untter i.
9:51 P.01
(Thle plan uas put Lnto effect ln I99Or
homegwners aeeoclatton uae turned overnot auara at thel" tlne of, purchaee that
A naJor selllng point of, all the r$1ts
Thatts whaf Eonvlnced ua to purchaee.
.Iuue E, 199'
i
before the sontrot bf tfreto tha honsownera. trile sstrethle had occuredr i
at SLnba Run, ls the v1ew.
:
i
faf
;|381-e3es
:
40tB Deerkail Hill Bmnngton, Illinods 6001 A
t\
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
7:30 P.M. 1.
Mayor Osterfoss
735 P.M.
7:40 P.M.
7:45 P.M. 4.
Garoline Tremblay
8:30 P.M. 5.
Chris Cares
Caroline Fisher
3.
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1993
7:30 P.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
Presentation of the Chuck Anderson youth Awards.
Bqckqround. Ratignale; The purpose of the award ls to recognlze andreinforce o-utstanding achievements by youth of the upper Eag-le Valley,
both for individual achievements and for their endeavors as role models for
others. chuck Anderson was a member of the Vail rown council and was
working to recognize outstanding youth at the time of his sudden death.
Michael Johnston and Ernest Medina, Jr. are this year's recipienls.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
Consent Agenda:
Approval of Minutes of tho June 1, lg9g, and June 15, 1999, Evening
Meetings.
Vail Valley Performance and Conference Genter (VVP&CC) Community
Opinion Forum.
AglUqn Flequested of Council: Hear input from the communlty about
whether they feel a Pertormance & Gonference Center would improve or
hurt the quality ol life in Vail; whether they think more groups would be
good for the economy; whether they think an additional 0.g% tax on
restaurants and bars and an additionat 1.8% tax on hotels is the right way
to help pay for this facility.
Backoround Flationale: The Community of Vail has been studying the
feasibility of building a Performance & Conference Center for the past threeyears. Based on the response to the project lrom many meetings and
numerous presentations, a plan has been developed to finance the
construction and annual operating costs of tre building through a
combination of taxes on hotels, restaurants, and bars as well as private
contributions. TOV is planning to commit up to 91,000,000 to this proiect
and has asked the community to come fonrvard to voice their opinions
about the proposed VVP&CC to determine the level ot community support
before pledging such a significant amount ol money.
1993 Communlty Survey Final Presentation.
Action Requested of Council: Carefully review survey findings in
preparation for the July 7,1993 short term goal setting session and for
upcoming budget process.
Backsround Rationale: The 1993 TOV Gommunity $urvey began in March.
In past years, a written survey has been sent to residents, second home
owners, and box holders. This year a more comprehensive survey was
conducted, with the assistiance of Nolan Ftosall of Rosatl, Remmen and
Cares of Boulder. Focus groups were held with community members in
March to determine which questions should be asked on this year's survey.
A writlen survey was produced and sent to 9,000 residents, second home
|'':
tlf
9:15 P.M. 6.
Shelly Mello
Larry Eskwith
930 P.M. 7.
Shelly Mello
Lary Eskwith
9:45 P.M. 8.
Tim Devlin
Lany Eskwith
10:15 P.M. 9.
Gary Murrain
Larry Eskwith
owners, box holders, and merchants. Following the written survey, a
random phone survey was conducted to follow up on issues raised within
the wrltten suryey. These results were tabulated and presented to focus
groups from the community to receive their feedback on the survey's
findings.
Staff &commendation: Carefully review findings of ihls comprehensivo
survey. A letter will be sent from Mayor Osterfoss to all focus group
members thanklng them for their involvement and giving them the final
analysis of the survey.
Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance amending
Chapter 1 6.04, and Sections 1 6. 1 2.0 1 0, 1 6.20.01 0, "1 6.20.22A, l 6.22.A1 O,
16.22.160, 16.26.010, 16.20.015, and 16.22.014 of the Town ot Vail
Municipal Code to provide for the prohibition of neon signs and exterior gas
filled, illuminated and fiber optic signs, and providing regulations regarding
the review of all other gas filled, iltuminated and liber optic signs, and
interior accent lighting; and providing details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of_.1?ouncit: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No, 5,
Series of 1993, on second reading.
Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance amending
Paragraphs 16.32.030(F) and 16.32.040(4) of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail, to provide for the termination ol any non-conforming sign five
years after the effective date of any amendment to the Sign Code
Ordinance, and setting forlh details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 13,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance amending Title
12 - Streets and Sidewalks of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, by
the addition of Chapter 12.16 - Revocable Right of Way permits, and
setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of Vail.
Action Bequested of Councj!: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 6,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
9ackqround Rationale: Council had directed stafl to review the existing
Revocable Right of way process and asked for an ordinance to be created
that would serve both the private and public needs by providing funding onfO!!$ for improvements recommended by the TOV StreeGcape plan,
the Tov village Master Plan, and the Lionshead uban Design Guide plan.
Council reviewed the draft ordinance at the June 22, lggg, Work Session
and made no changes. please note that the Mill creek court Buildino
representative, Mark Matthews, has indicated that he would like to incluct6
the design and labor costs in the amortized costs ol the proJect, as well as
construction costs.
SlaflRecomm€ndation: Approve Ordinance No. 6, Serios of 1993, on first
readlng.
Ordinance No. 15, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance amending
section 15.02.020(A) and 15.02.020(G) ot the Munlctpat code ot the Towi
of vail, to provide for the adoption of chapter 31 of the 1g9s supplement
of lhe uniform Building code and to provide for the adoption of
'the 199s
Edition ol the National Etectricat code, and amending seciion 1s.02.0g0(c)
of the Municipal code of the Town of Vail to provide for the adoption of an
t\
elevator inspection fee in the amount of $150.00 for each elevator, and a
commercial dumbwaiter inspection fee in the amount of $75.00 for each
dumbwaiter, and a will call inspection fee in the amount of $3.00 per
permit;and providing details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 15,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 15, Series of 199S, on
lirst reading.
1 0:45 P.M' 1 0. Ordinance No. 1 6, Series ol 1993, lirst reading, an ordinance repealing and
Tim Devlin reenacting Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1977; Ordinance No. 3'3, Series of
Lany Eskwith 1978, and Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1986; an ordinance amending
Special Development District #5 and providing tor a development plan and
its contents; permitted, conditional and accessory uses; development
standards, recreation amenities tax, and other special provisions; and
setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Simba Land
CorporationAAlal id Said.
Action Flequested of Council: Approve/deny/modity Ordinance No. 16,
Series of 1993, on first reading.
Backqround Rationale: Please see the CDD memorandum to the PEC
dated June 28, 1993. On June 28, 1993, the PEC recommended approval
(by a vote of 5-0-1) of the applicant's request for a major amendment to
SDD #5. The PEC did allow for one (1) additional unit having a total
GRFA of 1602 square feet to be added to the project in the future.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1993, on
tirst reading.
11:45 P.M. 1 1. Appeal of a PEC decision to not allow the removal of a dwelling unit in the
Kristan Pritz A & D Building/286 Bridge StreeVlots A-D/Block 5A, Vail Mllage First Filing,
Larry Eskwith Appellant Vail Associates, Inc. represented by Jack Hunn.
Action Requested of Council: Upholcl/overturn/modify the PEC decision.
Backqround Rationale: The PEC voted 4-1-1 to not allow the request.
Please see the PEC memo to Council in this packet.
12:15 A.M. 12. Adjournment.
otaoooa
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,7/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVEFVIEW WOBK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,7|?0EI, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,7|AOEI1, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
CMGENDA.TCE
otaaooo
4:30 P.M.
Tim Devlin
5:15 P.M.
Andy Knudtsen
6:15 P.M.
Rob Robinson
6:45 P.M.
7:30 P.M.
l.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1993
4:30 P.M.lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
Site Visil SDD #5 (Simba Flun $DD - Savoy Villas,) tocated at I100
North Frontage Road. Applicant Simba Land Corporation/Walid
Said.
4c$on_Bequested of Council: The property has been fully staked.
Review the site lay-out in preparation for a request tor a major
amendment to SDD #5 (Simba Run SDD) to allow tor the
development of the remaining portion of the Special Development
District located at n00 North Frontage Road. (Ordinance No. 16,
Series of 1993, first reading.)
Backoround Rationale: Please see the memorandum trom the
Community Development Department (CDD) to the planning and
EnvironmentalCommission (PEC) dated June 28, 1993.
Housing Authority Update.
Action Reouested of Gouncil: Review activities the Housing
Authority has taken in recent months.
Vail Recreation District (VRD) / Par 3 Golf Course Discussion and
U@ate.
Action Reouested of Council: Before the VRD pursues off-site
mitigation possibilities, the VRD Board requests that they again get
the concurrence from Council on the project as a whole.
Background Rationale: Off-site mitigation research will cost Vail
taxpayers approximately $l?,000. Before proceeding, the VRD
Board wants lo see if Council still supports the golf course.
Information Update.
Council Reports.
Other.
Executive Session: Legal and Personnel Matters.
Adjournment.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
ooaaoaa
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION
wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 7/13193, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. tN Tov couNcrL OHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION
wfLL BE oN TUESDAY,7|2OE3, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. lN Tov couNctl OHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY,7I2OE3, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. tN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
C:\AGENOA.WSE
ooaoaoa
/*/-* /a,1 u,
5/z z-r{rfi,
/rc
I
I .a
t
JLfl- El '93 16:EE H A L qqCTRONICS HTLtrNTA, GR. I
=rH s(xd #n*otrpcDnr. rcl rtrrac.
P.1
; {aoa} .155-0626
COMPANY:
FAX *
RETITRN FAX - (4O4) 4556435
MODEM (4O4) 452-PLOT (?568) rA){ (agr) a556435 r
TELEOOPYCOVSR SHEET
HEET:
r,tti .
- /J4- N,eT-@+T/
4.^ 17'2 '73 a lo:oo 4n
: ).V;)
TO:
Post-lt* brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # ot pages > 27
-1,-
JUL E1 '93 16121 H & L CS RTLANTH, GR,
JuIy 1, 1993
tdr. Utkc ilolllcaVEll Plennlng BorrdClty of Vatl
76 L lrontagc RoadVall, cO E16O?
Dtrr Ulke:
Ihan} you for your a8si$tance ln lettlng ne f,now sttrbaDcveloln.n! bas novrd tb€Ir butldtng ofi tne cxtettnguorcoemcrr' gltc.
ELECTRONI
a l'.(t
/i[t'; . ,]W
Riul
lftcr thtntsrng ovcr the other part of, our convstreatlon cbout theeaaanant for thc drlveway, r now facl thet bafore ttrr riinntnsBoard or thc rown of vatl approvag thls, r would ttke to o.clr*an cxtGnrton of tlnc bgforc-arry actton ir takcn, cltbcr'by ifaPlanntng Board or the Town of Vatl Clty Couactl
Il ?ee[a alrplrcnt that our Board of DlrGctorg hae been ltx lathalr firtlee to thc Honeownrrs. Slnce only afew of thGllo!6oflner6 ere ara?G of the fncte condpnligt thle sltuatlon.Plcare grant n€ e eonttnurmec of at leaet ihrcs to four frsctgsubaeqrJ€nt to recetpt fron you of all the tntornatlon on: thteand r rrll scc thrt Hon.offainc are notlflGd. r reei ttrJli- --
should- ba garanGters aa to bow mrch authorlty the uonco*n.rrEoarcl hrB and lt ehould be lcft uD to the honcowrer to votc onwhethar rr thlnk ltr ln our bcet l,ntcrcat ror trrJ ccvcropai touae stlattng larrd that belonga to the Eoncownela lnprecB-nogr.Af,tcr all h: tr the only onc who stand, to proflt f-roa thlsGracDent, lt would ueen our propcrty valuc nourd go dowfr.: Ttrlsarea would nakc a glrrat clte tor a lcneed ln chlld,ranre,playground, or u3c la roreway to b€ncftt our guc{rt or owh6rf. t
1olld llkc-to fusga?t thr! h. plrn a dltvaway-for thc ncw SavoyU_nlt8 on hlr Drolr.rty, rnd let thr property iatd f,or by ourI{oneownar! rcni:ln aq te. Aftrr all,-ani plop-rty tn Vail tteoneldered of great valuc aad do not tiln* ttoncornrcre *re glvlngFroE€rty asrsy nor letttng Developere pocket thetr lnveatbentnon€Y.
Thls saequent qgraa[cnt, I belleve, war firltten lntoDcclaratlon bcforr thc glnba Run Honcornerg toolc ovsrualntalntng thc propcrty, whcn ?lall€ $qld rac ln totatthug clcartng the ray lor uae o! thte property wlthoutlrave thr Xgu€gwa€ra r approrzal .
Ith5
cantrol ,havtng to
iThto drlvcway could
due to tbs uslntancercaults.
lleke thc prsscnt ltoncgwncra I dues tnbreaac
upkeep as well aE creat€ othcr untsVprable
If would, llke to Intorn all the lloneo[vncrs, slnsenot tlken thase atrp8, but would nced to hevc alltnforhatlon aDd g to { weeke ln ordcr to do thls.lloncotm'er, I tccl thc d;clslon chouldl be to tha S{not to our Eoaral gf Dtfoctora.
our Bolrd hasthe latsetAaa .
Eobcolwrcrt,
JUL A1 '93 T6.?2. I] & L ELECTROI{ICS ATLFil.'ITR, GA.o:l:
I would appr€slatc you sandtrrg to [e, tederal Expreee, alldoeun'ntatfon you havc. vou u-y uea uy Fedcral liprece nunberwhteh ts OSOO-2i[19-6. , ,
;I nould alEo tlkc your co$nentr Glthgr by Bhona, fal(, or nall on
.:thle Gett6r.
Ir wsuld alt'o lilce to con|lent on $hat a great Job the progle tnyorrr otflca do. The rcccpttonlst le co vcry pLaarant -v$ytlncxrvc c.lled, you hsve baen to nlcs rbout litirntng ny calic anilyout aaturcrs arg tlpccccblc
sllferclY,gr*Ut/,*o
'99v-rrty {. r.,cwtcShba Run Condo ttaoa61ll Psachtrce RoadAtlrntr, 6t 303{l :
j
t-, J
i
I
I
F ILI SOPY
use only. He said that dormers could be added on the south and west end of the
building, He added that he would like to see them address the parking issue
somehow.
Greg Amsden stated that he would like to see the upper (fifth) floor removed from the
design. The west end may be able to increase in height but all other roof ridges must
stay the same, Dormers must be pulled back.
Diana Donovan suggested that the applicant use the "dead space" in the building to
redevelop. The key is to use the interior space. She commented that redevelopment
does not have to be bigger.
Bill Anderson stated that if the applicant could address all of Jeff Bowen's concems, he
may be able to approve the proposal.
Jim Lamont stated thal he would like to see the existing building areas converted
without breaking out of the existing building envelope.
George Lamb commented that the building is simply moved out in respect to zoning.
Kathy Langenwaller said that it was important that the north side eave line should be
maintained for pedestrian scale.
Michael Barclay said that he appreciated the boards' commenb and that he would like
to bring this item back to another worksession wilh a revised proposal.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that the PEC generally liked the buildings as it currently is
and that she would not suggest that the applicant change the overall design.
Diana Donovan stated that the dormers should be created to a@ess the 1dead space"
of the building, not to create additional rooms.
7. A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the $imba Run SDD, Savoy Mllas, located at 'l100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
That part of the Fhsi Supplemenlal Map lor Simba Run Condominium, according to the map thereof
recorded in the ottice o{ the Eagle Counly, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as lollows:
Beginning at the most sodhwesterly comer of said map, thehce the tollowing three courses along lhe
westerly lines ot said map; 1) NO3"3g'01"E 160.79 feet; 2) N12o50'33"E 144.72leeli 3) N17"56'03" 70.€0
leet; thence, deparling said westarly lin6, S.|3"16'03"W 157.26ieet, thence S76043'57"E 91,50 fe6t; thence
N13"16'03'E 35.00 {6et; thence S76'43'57'E 72.31 teet to fie easterly line of said map; thence the following
two courses along the easterly and southeasterly lines ot said map; 1) S24'44t"E 52.38 fget; 2)
S52'50'2S"W 272.50 teel to the Point of Beginning, coniaining 0.6134 acres, morE or less; and
That pan ot Simba Fun, according to th6 map thereof, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in the Offlce ot
the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as lollows:
Plannlng and Environmental Commlssion
June 28, 19sl
f.
Beginning at the most southerly comer of said Simba Run, thence the tollowing tour coufses along the
southwesterly and nonhwestsrly lines of said Simba Run; 1) N37'0S31'W 233.2S le€l; 2) 334.57 feet along
the 8rc ot a curve to thE left, having a radius of 1Z1.gS t€et, a central angle ol 10040'06", and a chord ihat
bears N42o13'20"E 334.07 feet; 3) N36%8 48" E 201.36 feet; 4) 15.96 feet along the arc ot a curv€ to the
right, having a radius of 428.02 feet, a central angle of 02a08'12", and a chord lhat bears N37o52'54'E
15.96leet to a comer on the westerly boundary ot the Fhst Supplemental Map for Simba Run
Condominium, according to the map thereot reoord€d ifl the ofiice of the Eagie County, Colorado, Clerk and
Recordeq thence lhe tollowing tour courses along said westerly boundary; 1) S21'51'2S"W 69.90 feet; 2)
Sl7'56'03"W 181.17 feet; 3) S12"5O33'W 144.72leet:4) 503.3[,'01"W 160,79 feet to th€ eoutheaslerly line
ol said Simba Run; thence, along said southeasterly line, S52"50'29"W 113.08 f€et to the Point of
Beginning, containing 1.560 acreg, mors or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land Corporation/Walid Said
Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica made a brief presentation per the staff memo and pointed out that there
were two corrections to the Zoning Analysis section of the memo on Page 4, These
corrections pertained to the enclosed parking percentages.
Kathy Langenwalter inquired whether the height of the proposed buildings would be
higher than the buitdings already in existence. She said that there are currently
buildings that exceed the allowable development siandard of 45 feet.
Jim Morter, the architect for the project, stated that none of the proposed buildings
would be higher than what is already in existence.
Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see the lower access road moved so that
the existing trees can be replanted immediately when they are removed for
construction.
Mike Mollica showed the PEC where staff would like to see additional
site. He suggested the final landscaping review be conducted by the
Board.
Jim Morter stated that he did not want the last paragraph on Page 11
memo, to preclude future developrnent, to be a condition of approval.
planting on the
Design Review
of the staff
Kathy Langenwalter asked staff whether the PEC could modify their recommendation
for approval such that the remaining density would be "no more than one additional
Type C dwelling unit consisting of 1,602 square feet (with a garage credit) to be
located at the east end of the lower bench townhomes in this development plan."
Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see a bike and pedestdan path
con$tructed on the site.
Jeff Bowen made a motion per the staff memo to recommend approvat of this request
for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the remaining
poftion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas per the staff rnemo with the modification
Planning and Environmental Gommleeion
June 28, lg$
that "no more than one additional Type C dwelling unit consisting of 1,602
square feet (with a garage credit) be located at the east end of the lower bench
townhomes in this development plan." Greg Amsden seconded this motion and a
5-0-1 vote approved this request with Bill Anderson abstaining due to a potential
conflict of inlerest.
8. Discussion of restrictions pertaining to development in areas having 40% or greater
slope.
Planner: Mike Mollica
Mike Mollica gave a brief overview of the staff memo and stated that the staff feels that
the vadance process is the best way to address development in areas having 4}o/o ar
greater slope.
There was general discussion amongst the PEC and the final PEC consensus was
agreement with the staff recommendation to not modify the Gode at this time.
9. Discussion of wall height standards lor slopes grealer than 30%.
Planner: Tim Devlin
Tim Devlin reilerated what Mike Mollica had said in the previous item, that the staff
feels that the variance process is the best way to address the wall height standards for
slopes greater than 30%.
Greg Amsden commented that it was his feeling that it was positive that staff and PEC
had some control over the wall height standards in such areas.
10. A request to review the Management Plan and Master Plan for the Vail Cemetery to be
located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located west of the Glen Lyon
subdivision and southeast of the Materhom neighborhood.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO JULY 12,1993
Jeff Bowen made a molion to table this request until July 12, '1993 with Greg Amsden
seconding this request. A 6-0 vote tabled this item until July 12, 1993.
1 1. A request for a height vafiance, a density variance, a landscape variance and a major
exterior alteration of the L'Ostello Condominium Building located at 705 West
Uonshead CirclelLot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead 4th Filing.
Appticant: LOstello Condominiums
Planner: Shelly Mello TABLED TO JULY 12, 1993
Planning and Environmental Comm lssion
June 28, 1993
I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
$UBJECT:
f/16il;c*
ilEIIORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Develop,ment
June 28, 1998
A request lor a major am€ndmont b SDD #5 to allouy for the devglopment of
ftg rsmaining porlion of he Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1100
Nodh Frontage Road ard described as follorvs:
That part of the First Supplemental Map tor Slmba Run Condonlnfum, a@d|u to fi. mapffi r.cord€d ln th€ offce ot $e Eagle County, Colorado. Chrk and Fecord*, descdbed es
bllows:
B€glnniaq at the mosl sor.rthvestedy oorn€r of 3ald map, therF. lhs foflo{ng three corrrs€e elor|g
rhc we$edy lnes cil sald map; t) No3o3:' 01'E 160.7e f6er; 2) N1?50'3il'E 144.72 fe€r; 3)
N1?"5€'ql'70.60 feet; thence, doparting sald wsstefy [no. Slg"16'09"W 15/.26 teet, th€nce
S76"rttt'5/'E 91.50 tsot; thence N13.16'03'E 35.00 feet; thence Si'/6.4{l'5-fE 72,31 toet ro the
.a$€rly lne of sald mEpi thenc! the folloring tup courssr abrg the oest€rly edd so$heestEdy
lnss of sald map; 1) s24",14'5rE 52.38 fea; 4 $52.5O29W 272.50 f€€t b rhe Polnt cf
Beglnnlng. conlaidng 0.6194 ecles, more or less; ard
Thal pan ol Simba Run, according to ths map rhsr6l, rmtdoct in Book 312 at Psgo 763 ln he
Otfice ol th€ Eagle County, Coloraclo, Clerft ard Rmder, d€ecrib€d as bllo*s:
Begindng at the most scutherly comel ol said €iirnba Rin, thence th€ bllowlrg lour canmes along
ltr€ Eoutttw€Gi€rly ard nonhwsst€rly lnes ot saft, Siimbs Rin; 1) N37"09ts1nv 233.2e
'eel;
Q
334.57 t€€t along lhe arc ot a qrrve lo the left, harrlng a radus of 121.95 feet, I cerdral angle ol
1f49'06., and a chord lhat bears N,|PP13'20'E 394.07 fcel; 3) N36'48"8" E 20136 toet; 4) 15.96
led along th€ arc af a curue to tho rtght, having a radius of 428.02 f€et, a central angle ol
02908'1f, .nd a ehord that b€afs N37o52'54' E 15.96 feet b a corner on the westery boundary of
tfte Filst Supplem€ntel Map lor Simba Run Condominlum, accordihg to tho map thereof rccod€d ln
the otlico ol th€ Eagle Oounty, Colorarh, Clert end R€coder; lh€nco lhe tollowlng four coulaes
alory eaid wsstedy bourdary; 1) S2l'5128'Vlt 69.90 l€d; 2) St7'56'03'W 181.17 t€et 3)
S1?50'33'W 14.72reer;4) S03"33'01aV 160.79 t€€r to tfte souh€astedy fine ol eald SlmbE Run;
th€nc€, along said scuthaast€rly line. S52!50'29'lrl/ 113.08 t€et b the Point of Beginrdng
contalnlng 1.560 acreq n|ore gr less.
Applicant:
Plsnner:
Simba Land CorporationMalld Said
Mike Mollica
The property orrner and applicant, Simba Land Corporation, is requesting a maior SDD
amendment for tbe remaining phase ot $pecial Devetropment Distdct #5 (Simh Runffail Run).
The property is located at 1100 Norft Frontage Hoad and is bounded by the Timber Rldge
Apartments to th€ west, the North Fron@e Road and Interstate 70 to $e south, Phas€ | of
Simba Run to the east and Lionsd€e Loop Road to the north.
\I
Ordinance #6, Series ol 1976, originally established SDD *5 and set the parameters lor he
development of the Vail Run Building. Ordinance #29, Saries of 1977, amerded SDD #5.
This amendment expanded the SDD with the addition of 6.3 acres immediately to the west of
Vail Run and In addition, divided the SDD into what is now known as Developm€nt Area A
(Vail Bun) and Development Area B (Simba Fun). The development standards f,or both areas
were specifically stipulated in this ordinance. SDD #5 was furthet modifisd by the passage of
Ordinance #33, Series of 1978, and ftdinance #24, Series of 1986.
[. DESCRTPTTON OF THE REOUESI
The proposed development plan lor tre final phase of Deveiopment Area B, in SDD #5,
consists of nineteen condominiums and four deed-restricted employee housirq unib. The
dovel@ment plan calls for one thres-unit lornhouse fuildirq to be located on the southern
portion of the property, with vehicular ac@ss tiaken from the existing Simba Run curb-ctrt off
of the Norh Frontag€ Road. The northem development of the property would take ac,cess
from Lionsddge Loop and would consist of four, four-unit condominium buildlngs and one,
four-unit employee housing building. Two curb cuts are proposed ofl of Uonsridge Loop.
On the northem bench of this site, each condominium is proposed to have a one-car garage,
and on the lower, or southem part of this site, each condominium would have a two-car
garage.
This final phase of ths SDD will be part of the existing Simba Run Gondominium Assodation,
and as such, will have acc€ss to all of the existing recreational amenities located ln the
existing Simba Run proiect. These recreational amenities include three outdoor bnnis courts,
two indoor racquetball courts and one indoor swimming pool. Vail Run has ils onrn oukloor
swimming pool and two indoor tennis courb.
This project site is located within a high severity rockfall-geologic hazard zone. The
applicant's consulting geologist, Nicholas Lampiris, has completed three geologic
investigations lor the property. The original study is dated April 18, 1993, wih updates ot ths
study completed on May 18, 1993 and June 18, 1993, and all three are atached to this
memorandum.
The SDD departs from the approved development standards in the following areas:
.slE mverage
€nclosed parklng
.landscaplng
Since the initial PEC work session on May 10, 1993, the applicant has modified the proposal
in the following areas:
.Due to legal questions regarding the allowable uses on the 'easement area', fio
tournhouses proposed for the lower bench of the project have been shifted to the west
so lhat hey are comdetely wihin the boundaries of the final phase property. ln order
!o a$om$ishlhis, the applicant ha,s etiminated one of the originafly proposed fourtwnhouses. Three units are now proposod in this area.
'vehicular acc€ss to fis lower bench is now proposad ftom the existing slnba Runcurbcut-
'For safety reasons, ihe existing Town bikepath would be relocated to lhe south, to thearea wfiere t|e property line crosses the siinba Ftun vehianlar qrucut.
'Adclitional hndscaflng and bermlry has been ackted throughout the site.
'A pedestdan path has been added between phasEs I and ll on the upper bendr. Thispath..wifl allow pedestrian accass lrom the upper bencfr to the lorer oilcn, and to theexisling simba Run recreaflonal facitities ani'shutte van partring to trrJ iast.
s
III. ZONING ANALYSEi
Usted below is fte zoning analysis for Development Area B. located in SDD #5 (Phase I includes the two exlsting Sirnba Run
buildirqs). Please note thal SDD #5 has no underlying zoning, as ft was annexed into tho Tonn in December of 1975 and he
original SDD was established during March of 1976.'i',Yh -o'1^"''^/'1s'
REMAINING DEV.
POTENNAL AFTER
PHASE I CONST.
Site Area:
Setbackg:
lleight
GRFA:
Units:
Employos
Du,€lling UniB:
"EiltE OorrcragE:
"Lard3ceping:
"Pattlq:
APPRCIVED DEV.
sIANp Rps
6.3 8s€B/274,428 3q. ft"
20' - all !€drnebr
129,000 8q. ft. - DUts
tO,00O 60. ft" - EHU'g
1S,000 sq. ft,
ts0
10 (min.)
tt,886 sq.ft.(S4I
til,e678q. fr. Foq
ger
PHASE I
DEV. AREA B
4.7 acre6/4H,732 sq. lL 1.6 acros
TOTAL
DEV. AREA B
6.9 rqBs
ll/A
N/A
123,000 sq. lt - DU's
7.137 eo, h - EXUI tr?'?'{
f9Q&Eeg hr "
1,6 rcrrr/G0,@t rq. ft
,0' . rll perlmrtf,
Proprrty [n.r
25.19'
12,282rq,.1L
2.536 .o. tl.
3f ,8r8 q. tr
t9
I
'r7fce cq.11 126*,
t2r02f !q. n {4n5}
20' - all pedmebr
prcpeny lircs
a). 60'
S0,807 sq. fi.
4.601 so. ft.
95,408 Bq. tt.
95
6
38,193 sq. n.
5.399 so, ft
i13,592 sq. lt.
14
1
<10,203 8q. h>
il4
10
'82,es5 aq. ft. S4)
*119,Ge6!q. lt {im
p /r-/L-
ZS t^/t-
66,08s sq. ft. $e&l
"'t10,22 6q. fi. (6ir%l N/A
l?Sencbeed (96%) N/
_94 ,?
Commercid &sa: -S
' Indudes 1,292 aquam he\ of fimb€r Rqa? €asbm-mosr hritdr.g.* The gopced pmisct d€pt!8 lrcrn fteee apprond rhwloFnant stEnffi.*' IndudeE 5,530 aqraro h€{ot hnecrying rfibh ryould be rsnorcd ftorn tho Phaso I pmD€rty io
\ -.,iz ondorcd dd tSoendoced 6l^ /5o
26anrfaeo - \ VCtut{rrp lB 2tF\_- 6+l +
IIIII
acomnrodao fre div€way b tre lfler bendr dwdoprmnt of Pluso ll,
I
I
\\\\\44no.l _7_-
4r%4r+
=5o y
rv. cRrrERrA TO BE USED lN Ey$LUAnNG THF PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, ttg Sr.pose of special development dlstricts [s to:
'... encourago flexlbility and crsativity in the developrnent of land in oder lo
promote ius mo€t appropriab uss; to lmprove tre design dlarac€r and quality
of new development within the town; to facilitate tre adequale and eonomical
provision of streets ard utitities; to preserve th€ natural and scenlc leabres of
open space areas; and to further the overall gpals of the community as stated
in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved developnent plan lor a spacial
dwelopment district, In coniunction with a property's underlyirg zone district,
shall sstablish the requlremenb for guHing development and uses of property
induded in ths epecial develop.nent distdct.'
The follotrring are the nine special development drstrict criteria to be utilEed by the Planning
and Environmental Commlsslon when evaluating SDD proposals:
A. Deslgn compatlblllty and sensltlvlty to the lmmedlate envhonment'
nelgNorhood and adfacent prcpertles relatlye to archltectural deslgn'
scale, bulkn bulldlng helght, buffer lones, ldentlty' Gharacter' vlsual
Integrlty and orlentatlon.
The original desrgn plan lor the tinal phase of the Simba Run developmenl Propossd
one lafie building on this Phase ll site. This building was desQned to bs similar to the
existing Simba buildings located immediately to the east. These bulldlngs are
approximately 260 feet in lengtr and approximatsly 50 feet in width. The project was
deiigned to t-ake access ott of Lionsrldge Loop (one curb cut) with a falrly large surface
parking area, as welt as one level of underground (structured) parking'
The cunent proposal before he PEC suggests a series of six smaller buildings.
Access is divkted between the North Frontqe Road and UonsriCge Loop' and the
parking for tre project is almost equally divided between enclosed parkiry and lurlace
ba*ing. Architedurally, he design is very similar to fiat ol the existng Slmba Run
project, although smaller in scale.
The staft believes trat the appllcant has done a reasonable lob wi$t the overall site
planning of the proiect to insure tre project msets this criterion. We leel that th€ mass
bt tre propose'O UuitOings oeates a transition from the existlng Simba Run buildings to
th€ east, wtridr are upnards of 60 feet in height, ard the existing Tlmber Ridge
butrHings to the west, whicfi are approximately 30 faet in heighl The lour
condominium buildings proposed on he nofiham or upper bench of lhls sils, are in
keeplng with the muN-Amity cfiaracter of the neighbofiood,.with each bttitsing
coniisfing of four dweiling rhits. fne employea buildirg to fie east also mnsists of
four dwefling unhb. The lbwer bonch of this site is desQned to accommodate three
atachsd townhomes, also meeting the multFfamily definition.
€
B. Uses, actlylty and denslty yuhlch pruvlde a compauble, efflclent and
workabls relatlonshlp wlth suroundlng uees and mtlvlty.
It is the staff's position that the proposed residential use on the site is compatible with
the existing uses on surrounding properties. The proposed density (numbers of units)
is also compatible with adjacent properties and would be [n conformance wlth tre High
Density Residential kJentiflcation that the Town of Vail Land Use Plan has placed on
this proprty. The proposal meets the technical definition ol a multi-family project. We
also believe it is positive that four employee housing units are Incorporated into lhe
development
Ths staff would also like to point out that wifi the approval and consfudion of lhis final
phase of the Simba Run project, Development Area B would be under the approved
density (number of units) and GRFA. Ttn p#ctwould be under the *rovgd
density by twer*lFlh,\e clrctling unib, and under tha maximum attorable C'RFA (DUts
and EHU'sl W 8,774 squars feet. The slafl leels that it is not sound planning to leave
this ttCIe of remaining density on the books without an approved development plan.
For this reason, #tt ls mcommending that sftqI€l thb final developrner{ propeafbe
approved, thd ths ramainlng number of dvelling units and GRFA be reduced to z€ro
for the entitB Devsloprnsr* Area B.
C. @mpllance wlth the parklng and loadlng requlremente as outllned In
Chapter 18.52.
The Town's parking requirements indicate that a total of 44 parking spaces are
required lor this Phase ll site. The applicant has proposed a total of zt8 parking
spaces for the project. Thr rae d oncfossd versue surlace parkhg sps6s br $b
Phase is approximsbly a fifty-fifty split, although the overall enclosed parkhg
percentrage for the entire Development Area B is 82%, whidr is less than the required
85%. Please see the Zoning Analysis on Page 3 of this memorandum tor the specific
numbers.
Each individual phase ol this project has been designed to meet the Town's parking
requirements.
D.
t.
Conformlty wlth appllcable elemenu] of the Yalt Gomprehenslve Plan,
Town pollcles and Urban llespn Plans.
The Town of Vail Land Use Plan ldentifies this area as High Density ResidenUal
(HDR). High Density ResirJential ls defined in the Land Use Plan as follorvs:
The housing in this category would tlryically
conslst of multi-floorcd strucfiJres with densiiles
ex€eding ftlteen chelling units per buildable acre.
Other aclivilies in this eategory rvolld include
pdvafe recreational facilities, and privaie parking
facili$es and inslitrtionaUpublic uses guch as
churches, fire stations and parks ard open space
frcilities.'
Tns propo*cdplrn brthe ffnd^phss d8ffic kr wddlctths orrcra*
dmEfty tor trsrrabFrnent Area S at 19.7 dwlllng urdtdsrc. Thls figrure,
|nclulrs fie anp$e lunlng unitsl
The following aro the applicable Lard Use Plan goals and policias whlcfi relate
to this proposal
Goal t.l Vail should continue to gror in a controllEd environmsnt,
maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and
recreational usss to serve both the visitor and permanent
reslCent
Goal 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of fie additional growth in
existirg developed areas (infill areas).
Goal 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in
existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where
high hazards do not exist.
Goal 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made availabte through
private efiorb, assisted by limited incentives, podded by tre
Town ol Vail, with appropriate restrlctions.
Goal 5.4 Residential growtr should keep paoe with the market flace
demands for a full range of housirg types.
Goal 5.5 The exlsting employee housirg base shouH be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing neads shouH be
accommodated d vafed sites throughout the community.
The stefr beliwes tte prdecft ls in conplianca wih Ste Twn's Lard Use Plafi.
2.
E. ldentlflcatlon and mltlgetlon ot natural snd/or geologlc hazards that affect
the prcpefty on srhlch the speclal development dlstrlct ls proposed,
This project site is located within a hbh s€vedty focldall hazard zorfi. The applicant's
geologist, Nidrolas lampiris, has reviewed he proposed site plan and has agreed that
th€ benning along Lionsfidge Loop Road (south side), combined with intemal mitigation
for the two eastem-most buildings, is sufficient to mitigale he rockfall hazard. Please
soe the attached lstters from Nicholas Lampids at the end of thie memorandum.
F. Slte phn, bulldlng deslgn and locatlon and opGn spaGe provlslons
deslgned to produce a func$onal development lesponslye and sensltlye
to natural ieaturcs, vegetatlon snd overall aesthetlc quallty of the
communlty.
The staff believes that the applicant has been responsive to the PEC's suggestions
regarding minor modifications to the site plan. We believe that he changes made to
the building locations have resulted in maintaining adequate distances between the
Phase ll proiect and the existing Simba Run builtling. The project would contnue to
exceed the ze/o maximum site coverage for the entire Develop,ment Area B, howsver,
ths stafi believes lhat the overall site planning for the project is acceptable and that the
proposed g0q6 Cb cowrags b reasonabls given the appro/ed densty. All of the
building locations have been sited to tiake advantage ol viorvs both to the east and to
the west. The site plan has also been modilied to accommodate the needs of the Vail
Fire Department.
Since the original PEC worksession, Sp +slicant hes modified th6 upper bendlol Se
dwolopmont and hw dftdnahd aS parking wlhin the req.rired 2Gfoot front eeffick-
arof,. Ons ol the hreo proposedcub cu!$ oft of Uonsridge loop has also @n
eliminatEd. The staff believes that all of these changes are positive changes hnd
result in a highsr quality project which will turther enhance its compatibility with he
immediate nelghborhood.
G. A clrculatlon system cleslgned for both vehlcles and pedesrlans
addresslng on and off-slte trafflc clrculatlon.
Site PlanA/ehicular Access (GDOT access oermit).
Aacess to the lo$nr bench d thb $iF. t0 he lhree townhoues-type' units, is propoead
via the edsffitg $limba fiun cudrqrt otf of fie North Frontqe Roadd Acc€ss to the
units on the northern or upper bench of this site is clesigned as a series ol two curb
cub off of Lionsddge l-oop Boad. Due to the change in us€, a Colorado Departrnent
of Transportation ac@ss permit will be required before a building permit can be
released for the thres units s|at take access off the North Frontrage Road.
Future Simba Underpass.
As discussed in the recenty adopted Vail Transportation Master Plan, the construction
of an l-70 underpass in the vicinity of Simba Run, is proposed as a first priority
recommendafion for both the West Vail lnterchange and ths lrtlain Vail intercharpe
improvements. The underpass would be constuc.ted inmediately opposite th€ lower
bench development. To accommodate the underpass, it woJd be nemssary to low€r
the Norfi Frontage Road approxlmately 13 to 15 leet in thh area. The apfllcant has
subrnitted a regrading flan whlctr indicates the regrading which would be necessary to
accomfilodate he future F70 underpass. lt appears that the applicanfs proposed
deslgn wouH not be In oonflict wih the future undorpass, and tha Town Engineer has
approved tie accoss and regrading plans.
Pedestrian Access.
The stalf has requesbd hat the applicant pursus th6 possibillty of locating afd$lle.
Bcdc$iEn path throqh fie prprtt so that pedestrian acffis can be maintalned from
the Lionsddge Loop area down to the North Frontage Road. Wa belisve that $is
pedestrian ac@ss would become even more critical should the propoeed Simba
underpass be constructod. The applicant has agreed that such a public sasem€nt
through the propedy would make good planning s€nse, however, the applicant is
concemed about the potential liability and maintenance issues sunounding a public
pedestrian path. The.rFFff€{rt,rE8 ryesd ls oonsidar adding I psdsstrlan oonnecilon
thro€h fp propsty €fslH fis Tou*n tttorney trb ebls b provide fietn rdh e hvel of
comfort regadirg lfu li$ifity conoems.
H. Functlonal and aesthetlc landscaplng end open $pace In order to optlmlze
and peserve natural features, rrcl€atlon, vlews and functlons.
At the suggestion of the Planning and Environmental Commission, the applicant has
modified the proposed landscaplng plan to incllde
tt helgffi dfil bNfs of tr* rpperttaue@mentam. 'tF Snnerts$l
proddod Uroughor,rt tre sits, lroffiisr, he p@ s a uM (for ths sEs.
Dovolopment Ares B),#Wmil[ftqquired S% minirnrn lanfte€ped arer.
The stafi has fioroughly reviewed he applicant's proposed landscape plan ior the
projecl, and wf feel eofifrrt He with fie propossd 5496 total hnd$capsd anra$or the
qll1g Development Area B. The staff would polnt out that given the densfi of this
site, the property could be compared with fte standard iruilF eorilr-trryhi*sodrl
require a minlmum d 309t hn&crped area.
Overall, staff believes hat lhe landscaplng plan generally provides adequate screenlng
and green space througtout the site. $buodd EgCIililmnil'hwJ3lEr; thatt|N
applicmt mocidsr$ldl$ord ecrren plantlrqs in fi€ bonn slong Lion'e nidp Loqp
tuad.
Fs sdaty rs{$trrs,, m cnmg r@rcdionJHl* pdh has been realQned eo that lt
crrcsss the vehicular a@sss to the lower darelopment area at ltn driveway's
htarssction witfi he property line.
,#,ry
northwest comer of the site. This would consist of a total of eight uwelllng units.Phase ll would include he remaining two buitdings in the uppei devetopment area andthe emfloyee building. The finat phase of ttre prfiea woutit consist of ihe three
townhomes loeated on the lowsr bench of the proierty. The statf believes that the
applicant's modifications to the phasing ptan are now acoeptabte.
T,-i*''
ry
Although the applicant has not met the required 85% enctosed parking percentage for theentire Development Area B, the staff does find that the appticarit has idsigned if,- prqea witnall ol the surface P.*tittg located on the nodh side ot the6uiktings, ino ttfii fre- trsFoseda yb?3-fTgSS p"rt ilg ii reasonanp. Again, ;ril;H ;oi"t our rhar r ne properqilt{een
ry)P" zoned High Density Multi-Family, the rsquired enclosed parking percentage.ouio-ire zsoz".
As indicated in section lV, H, of fris staff memorandum, the applicant has not met therequired 60% minimum landscape percentage for the entire Diraelopment A,€a B. AfterotefYlanalysis of the proposed landscaping plln forthffioperty, ihg ffit56erce11ryregvegll$u planning ard lendscapir€ plan fortris site ie reaion#re. ws rvoufd abo ponit orrtthat if the prop9.ry had been zored High Density Multi-Family, which woutd be consisient wigrthe density on hie Eib, the requdred landscapirE paroentage would ba 3016.
In summary, the staff ia reoommeildrg approval with thg urderstarding that the applicantagrees_with the follorlng conditions, anO *a belbvE the proiect substa-ntiatty compli€s wifir'ttrenlne SDD review criteria as indicated in this memoranduir. 'The conditions are ai fo[ows:
Phashg plan or subdlvtslon ptan that wilt matntaln a workable, funcilonal
end eftfcfent relaflonshtp throughout the devetopment ot the sipctat
development dtstrtct.
slnce the initial PEC work session,tre applicant has modified the project's phasingplan. Phase I would now consist of the tiro cordominiurn buildingi tocateo on frre
V. STAFFRECOMMENDANON
Tha etafi is recomm€ndirE, apFEvel ot the applicant's request for a major modificaton toSpecial Developmenl Oistricrt*to. 5. We Uefnve that the modifications which have been madeto the proiect, since the initial PEC work session, have brought he project into compliancewith the nine Special Development Distri,ct review criteria lisied in mis inemoranOuni.
With regard to the devetoprnent standards as indicated in fre Zoning Analysis section of lhismemorandum, the staff does acknowledge that the project is over oi site ioverage and ls
u-nder on the required enclosed parking percentage and minimum landscaping $rcentage.Wlth regard to eit?covsrags, $s Fhase I rhwhprncnt on thi$ sns (the exbfing Strdre Bunpuiliilgg) fas dready exceeded the 2096 maximum site coverage iv t*a, orii,tB rq$et"foet. ws hink that he toht $p cw.eraoe pr@osed, 9096, is refodabb given the high "'
density residential nature of tfllnrolect. Ab apoint ot comparison, snouri this propefty have
?:_"_l_t^off-difl,93i$.!frrsi'Fsrnilv, ths maximum allonrinb sib coverwe, iccdruqg tocurrent ronn d vail eoning, would be 55%. The staff firds that the proposeo 30% sitecoverage and the overall site plan design is reasonabte
t0
1. The Town shall not lssue a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for any of the
Phase 1l cordominiums untilsucfi time as TCO's have been issued for all four
units in the employee holsing fui|ding.
9,, The appllcant agrees that if the liability issues conceming he construction and
malnbnance of a public p€destrian path/easementhrough the property can be
resolwd with the Town Aftorney, the appllcant shall consfuc't a @estrian patl
and grant a public acoess easement b the Town of Vail.
3. A Colorado Department of Transportation ecossg permit shall be granted prior
to lhe issuance of any buikling or grading pemits lor tle lower bendt of the
development (three lownhomes).
4. The applicant agrees to permanently restrict the lour employee housirq unib as
Type lll'EHU'S, aooordi,ng tro the Town's dopted housing ordinanoe.
5. That the applicant add additionalscreen plantings in the berm along Uon's
Ridge Loop Road, and afso between the North Frontage Road ard the tike
path, subject to he review and approval of the Design Revisw Board.
In addition to the above, eB s{f;rg@rnrncndgtion for *Brovsl h.ool#pmt rpon the"
applicant rurseing to reduce Ute fgqehilq dansity (number ol unils urd GnpA) for frd enth
DevoloFm€nt Area e h.zoffi trt$ altrtdft dafll0smsnt$rupffid b.affirgt 4 fi€ sfitf
belfiavsE hd fi is not eptroprtde lo Elloril excess developner* dSrE to exbt $or tlri* pmparty,
without an approvd dwelcPmsnt dan.
cXpcc\m€moe\simba.@8
,j..Lffi^*- N,e/a^
11
0t
I
.a
!
Itj
1
It
$
G
0
]
0
t
{lI
|r
,lttrll$l \ |,I
u
0
a</
9+
s
I'tt
'ttl
..?t9
II9t
If,t
i1
llI
F
t
\
\
F
ii
Il
I
F
t't
I
I
l/
II
I
t/
ilI
u
II
{\
4h
tlllHrot-'
lt
t(
f$\\
,t#:
tl
|t+
!t"kt6ot\o o
.&,''
nt^ o^o-o
rl
0(
t-rtt
0
t
t-{
0
'3
tur
F
b
==o'-_'
cz
I1tql
o
Savoy Villas
so.d.l Dat/&ocr.d olt{d
Vail. Colorr.ro '
ffi
q Wll$fl ffi|il:l 4jl
o
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULNNG GEOLOGIST
P.O. BOX 2
srLT' coLoRADo 81652
t30iu 876.5400 (P4 HOIJFS)
June 18, 1??3
REC'DJUN25t993,
Bally Erainerdl'lorter Archi tects
143 EaEt l*leadow Drive
trrossroads at VailVail, CO 81657
ne; saviy vlttas U, lH fia+tr- l.t !I
Dear Sal ly:
I have reviewed the gite plan which you have recently sent, asper ouF discussions, for mitigatlon o{ the rock {all hazard atthe site. You hava EddresEed my concerns very well and only eomeof the garage areas rernain Eonewhat unprotected.
ldith the berms in place es you have defined them, very few rockecan reach the units, ands because the fronts of nost of thoseunits are in the forrn o{ garageE, I am not contrerned that damagecan occLrr to living quarters. If there are stilt questionseontact me.
tronsulting Eeolegist
i:laI 2A '1,3 9r53 68€3
|.{rnxsLsl
l:e,' i es o
!Ji.ih the h*rira in F1,.lcE il$ yErl hav$ df,'f inilf! thslrlt very f {+t' rcci;:t
E$,n t'e&ei\ tlrLl t'.ir.r;f.t'.lr'ii fc i- rrt,"li,s r iir'' r:1 1 i'-i?qr'L'3'4 lhe f r''':rrlLei of
tir i,.i:-o unlt.,i &f i-l in the f r:rm of tl*.ra0rr$. I fi'tn noI c lrlt::f.1-r':
riJ hlrat
,J=',rqn .:€1"r cc:trur ts l i.ving *i.t;irlai-t' The **$r er nfi.o'ilri L:fii t'3"
i'ro$iev.:jf- r t:ili,,l-c rflE j. f ai 3 ira:ai'rj': RI-; 1c;;i; .lievot'-er-ti's*]!'3- *-"t4rt
lr.irrn eorl r1n .qaragq- In prai:*ct' l iving- quart.€rE',.,J:iot.l:f "t"tre{trfnnend * three 'ir:ot'hi-ch ,;tr:nr ftlu,ll rJi'l th;r north ,t,? I I r'+;'} I
Nlcholas LamPiris, Ph'D'
cQN$JLttl{u t,E':'LQ(;tsr
O1A5 INGTI-IiiLIIL LANE
5lLT. QCLORAITo 810:'?
t3c:') 4?(;5'1C0 ("r HOUlis)
flay t8r l??3
tisl l y llr6inarr,
l.lor t er tlrchi tsct{5
141 HeEt l'l€acat'l Dr':'ve
Cr c|sp,r ssrrlri at vall I
Vailr UO Alg$7
RFi Ssv$y UlIles
1.'ii;i; . il.: l. i ,..'I
I heve rqvi EHstJ tlitl eitE Flall fJhi c11 yolr h R'/rl rr:ctntl y rrant' ;r*
pei-oltrrJit-'cgr':rlc:n';rfot'i0ltiti'ir(]tlcftftsrLt':ki"iILlr'at-'rd'rt
tliel site. YFll iliiva aiJdr-r!EtErj ril\l,' iunc'Jl'f1r.i viil-/ xtll l i'iut f:1"*rri 'l.rer
Ettll a canplrr of rhanget 6r *ddit1onl3 Hnlch sh rJl'J lre
i nccil"prrate'-i.
ehr:*l d h*v* a etren(iLir ci 4i 0 ;1i:ri;i Jr.i pt;i'' fitsLIil:i'i! 1r ':i(3t' '':iirl l'l:1
(l(artr'!i ;i{'i rii:rr)ni.i ;rx {F.:";l lf ! e irr tif ii v"aI I '
o1 r*rr, tlroi.rl i?! a hr'eait lrr the berirt I n f i- nL r;'i i.i:.i r;e:j;'"' r'iiii ii. .ili)
thH sr*qt f or, ilrlvE$sry a{:i..e* fs, 'f he uxir.;:;erl t}*rl:1.t}ir -.I+ t'n':'. uf}it
u,,i"l cn { n n*t u*r.*q* "h,lut.J be 'rlre silaii: strG:ft,;{:h r+all to tflregq
f r*e'L ' f i tiie;'rr are riti 1l questls;l5 5;t.131f'6i6d nig'
4r4r{, '//*tu,^
Hi.f'ror"* r-andirje
tloorul tl nE 6eol ogi st'
l'.
o
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0185 INGEFSOLL I.ANE
stLT, coLoFADO 81654
F03) 8766{00 {2{ HOUBS}
Sially Flrai nerrj
l"lc.rr {: r':r- Arn!"ri tect::
1rf 3 EsEt l"inacluir llri'.'e
Cr-trssroa.rls at- Vai I
.Vail, C0 81657
ItE: Siavny l,i ll l. arli
Deerr $* I I .,r I
I hai,rl rer,:i ewed the si t,e n.f the re.f er-enc*d prr.iecf as shcrwn on
th',? ;rcc{:l|r]panyj.nrl rniHp {or F]urpos€s o{ $ock Fo11 t-e""rier.l {:clr the..lnt.lnn.'.L,.1,lj]".]-lrrrnnrtirernfrrttrLlnitffiicJi1
Rtrck f ai I rsn,lir d're to the sutcroppinB o{ :i*:rndston6i nn the othi:lrr;l dr.r *{ i:hsr [...inn'* ]lirJEt6 LootrJ. l"hF selrr:nd tier r:.f unj,tg. i:i nrrt
i i*, tihil ha:
":r
t- i1 r {:lf.te,
Iiri.s :i.s i,n ":r lnc;l'h:ion r.rlrerer thu' i*id_qso ccint:ei.rri ng .[hsi sr:t.rrcer crr:
Fclt:i,ri.r'f.i*i ..i:a11irrq rnckli, in at a L or^t 1c..:veL {.ti t-h remiiert t,: thnrii ti:1::r l:rrti'. r-ric:!cs iii:rn t.Fiilcih tiltl noFthel-t.n._g,i.*es. T't," ri: r.rlcl'':r:i r.J i. I Ii.r;lv*.:.:iqr|:i.'i.i'cj:t|-'t']t:lf-|flr.{:|y{:t].h}.ra.t@J:'!ce$;ijjr"V.
lrhirv r.r.n1ii.-rfrlir.l i-r.:r[*s $rr:r..r[- ahnr,:.: th]E-profroEed ae:,vffiEnTlr--ut
tftt::t l--i::ijlt', r-s+cl wi l. l. eat{:h some n.f t-hern, The haiard i ncr-o;lsr:ra tnf.hn r'm:i t ttlir:r-tl tlre r^i dgri" beconrels hiqlher, therelry irrrparLin[i nrc]re .lri.netic r',".nerqy to potential'fatting rocl.:*.
:[ pr-{.]pn.r* r*everal. alternntiveg to surhstantiaL lyr lni6ini:rer theha:*,rd .f ron {'nl-l i. n11 :.pel6'1.r", A f oUr .[ocrt. hiqh bernr rrray--hecttrig't.t'.t.tt:t.r:d*:rlr:rnr].!'|rgl-qot-t.L'[ritE:'.
rrl 1j:; illfiy n{:tt L'i {-'r at I ot\ted bec(auge it, m_ey intei,-{ere tJitl"l the Fc'sdril.ht r:f r.r;.iy" Anothei. step rnrhich tran be takBn i'b to dr.rsirln tjlln{r'en!: {nnr-th :;i de) of eerch of thege {our r-rni tsn t$ a strerartfr d+
at L e.l$oLtnr|-.i er F.,quare .l-ot]t +or a e€{st {our '{eet atrtf,ve
RTE EhELt I
$.o thiet rrckc canirot Cr-rsrr thror-rCIh t6€!m tnfcl thr+-iiTTl gLIF
'K
ci.ri I enfli. nnr*r rfl*y. Eiugci€st =art €nergy absortring .f .xrinp slrch asLt:qr tr: protect the hr:itt1e concretF. ..I{ poss,iEl.e" bmtfr r:{ ther.*F
cleg:iqns lsFrnLtld be r-r'tj. lired' especially {clr thtr r,le:iter-n tr.rg urnits,
ich is S
. f eclt hicth r-rith the rismgr strenoth €iven atrnve. This r,^,all cauld
i:\ j :;if, l) iil r.r { r"rel. I rr l[ art:d I ar.qe (.] {oot ) hcrr"rl dert;. FJsrcautg€ cif f-he
nat-.ure o{ {:ho harart1 and the cptions {or mitignticlnr I q-tFg#sit{:hilt 'f i.n,:ll pLan€ b* rrsvier,tecJ hy yoLtr Bngi. n6,-:cr irnri mtl (oF {:}EFe:-
eciterlrrr i caI b:rt:ert) onge -EFE err-ed 'nethods hava he.en chosen.
+I I I r.ii *nndf.r-ndt i on o.f these uni ts ctr. an\, c:.1 the prnposed fiiti
1,,not t. nct,-eaFe irq hazard to nther nr erty or structureg
c)-r^ray n trui l di nge ) rol3cjs,5treet:i, easemen
e1! $r +ac
.11r" $ rlt.rest- j onr ple,ase contact mu"o e:-"peci a uri ng ynur
prr:r I i rni i"lary *orrceptu"rl i:"rticns"
onsLrltinq finnlogi$t
at i trir
JamesStress -381-9595t?-cq,Jan 29,4: 9:51 P.01
I {, C Properties
nt|tqlcttF lr7qlltr4rFrllrrir
I
I
I
Mr. r1n Devlln t, \ !
ctty of vatl ^-lu,- /''/'?^ ) i
Plannerof Property /, a-F ., i,'
[3itl";"I33lllt"rTliz U"* -,
*, * '4 fr ry,u*o' '
Mr. fl.n Devlinclty of vatJ. ^.*,,,- /''% ) iPlannerof Property /, a-F ,, .i,
.tuns 6, 1993
the pLans of, t{alld and Slnbalancl Corp.flnanclal lnpact on the value of [any
As ovnere of rmX.t 22O] at.'Slnba Run, re eulrongly o$IloBd tne plansof Walld, and Slnbaland Corp. to deielop the laird ad3acent toSlnba Run on the edge of eectlon 1 and 2. It wllL eeverly lnpactthe vaLue of our propertyl by deetroying the vl.ew uhlch tC thenaJor part of, the value of our unlter
'Thle plan waa put into effect in 199O, bafore the control pf the
homeowners aesoclatlon was turned over to the honeowagrgr 14le rr€fenot awars at ther" t1r0e of purchaee that thls hsd occured. :
A naJor ee11in6 point of all the unl-ts at Simba Run, ls tliE vlew.Thatts what convLncEd ue to purchaeer
We therefore requeet thatbe ilenled besause of theunlt omers at Stebe Run.
Cordlally;
Jwe/cp
W'rnrrnu
i
40IB Deerhail Hill Barrington, lllinois 60010
,.
tu*-.r*-gr3 15183 FRoN
J83)
421-342?
FAx To: Tim Devlln Taila79-?a5?Planner cf Community property for Clty of VaII755 5. Frontnge poed veil, Cb. glgsz -
I oppose the pl,ans of WaLio Said and Simba Land
Corporation for cteveloprnent of l{rnd next ,to Simbo Run.
Iotvn a unit in Simba Run and feel the planned new build_
ings on the edge of the present tso bulldtngs nlll havc
a dlstlnct edvetse effect on sight lines and values Of
nnners in the presrnt buildtngs.
Flans fot tne new developrnent, use 0f lanC nort apart of present stmba Run and a tie ln with.,the fecllltiesof Siliba Run $ere put tnto effect in 1990 before i
pruchaeed my unit. I was not told of tfreue rlang gp6
6t Fresent rnany homecwners are stil1 not anare nf the
nerrl plans.
I feel there has been obfuscatlon and dlsregard for
thc rtghts of others ln Ltris proposed plan thet $ho,Jld
not be allowed to continur',,,--
4'#-((a*u
FRANK N. Cr_ARK -
TB t479.245? P.Ol
FFOr'r I P.
'
It,
I
Juae 8, 1993
MN. TI!{ DEVLIN
Clty nf VA?t.
Planner ot Pf,opsrby
?ES S- ?rnn+.idc Ril.
Valt . Colorado 81657
DearHr. Devlrn, (l*t .f r;; -(44-"'
^4 /t^t
we ure olrncrg of *14?5 at Simba un Csndominlum ln{ltst ttlotrgt{t
oDFoE. ttrc plens ;; ;t;i;; "nn-sittt"iiia-eitp' to buildt'i new
plbject nelqhborinf with our bulldllng€.
Thie t111 have a very Etrong irnpuet on the value of our
pt"p"i-t,iill-rl vrrr nou onlv alatroy thc wlcrr but dcfinltcly
Lover t'heir Prices
Becausa vc dld not lmov about lb at the tlme of purehase we
feque8t that You deny Walid al|rl FltrrLralcrrd Cr:rrp' PIanE
to build ln thls loeatlon,
Tnlc Frojaet n'ould have a negatlve lnf].uence on tlre value
of eI1 unita Jn Slnba Run.
y:.;'rpd..*{
.!{ntla I. Blenlard
8440 N. Cllfton lve.
Ntlee, Itl. 60?14
rel. (708) 696-0925
n,, y' *S - l,!*F-,q -,S o H I t,:,LF * *,ril*-,r,,p ! | | d r
t
Dns l.Dsltcl.lroH ,- [O]r!,
F. r33
DATE APFIICAIION
DATE OF DRE
r,
A.
B. TYPE OF REVIET{I
.- X -New Construatlon ($200.001 l,ltnor Alterht j_on ($20.00)Addttlon (SS0.001 ,,-Conceptuat Rovtew ($01C. TDDRTS$:
D. IEGALI DE$CRIPrION: lot _. ., Block
Subdlvlglon
r-f _p"?pg|ty lLft:l.l!"i.!y a rn€bL8 and bounds lesaroesgrlptlonf.Flsdee.provld6 qn a B6parat,e sh6€L andaEtach ro thlb spptltatlqn.
E, ZONING:
clnt,
f,Eil;
rl
a
1d
epp
Iob.
F.
G.
LOT ARE.[: If requlredrst &mpEd gurvey shoulng t"tr.. dof;ru#e a currenh
NA.r'fF or
Ma!.Ilng
APPLTChNT 1- !{a1ld
Addrets I
Land Co atlon
Fhono
t
lt.NAI'{E OFmalllng APPTTCANTt $ S.HpnusENftrrrtE IAddr€s$r l4i E. Meadow Dnlve
r , HAME 0f. 0B|NERS r
(t,
K,
*srolrAruRE tsl :Malllng Addie
Phone
Condomlnlum Approval lf appllcable,
PII IP!: ?tr_Ipeft.as ahown_abovei Ere Lo be pa{d ar
coirect fee te haid,F
_.1F:Tl. as 8?own_oDovei Ere Eo be patd atsubm+tLql of, DRB upfticatlon. , tbcer, wherrthe.tlme gf srrbm{irai or-oiiu-Iiiiicliionl I=l5Ei}, r+happlytng for a. butldlrrg permlt,r' pfeaee-ia*ntlly-lr,e
l?gyrlqg valuat{.on or fni propbsir. rne iowii-i,r-v*rrllll "alpsr rh€ ree-icq6idi;;-[;-[r,u ilEri-iiilrl*, roensure bhs coirect fee ts traid,
FFE Sc4$purrE:
VAI,UA?IO1-I$ 0-q 10,000 $! l!,q81 * t so;ooo if 99,9q1 -' I 150;ooo itllf9,9ql-+ soo;ooo $i$500,001 - gr, oooigoo ii, . I over $1r 000;000 $S
'* PSgIgry nqvtrEn FqAsD rprnowr., EnEtRrg OtlE rBrR nSFEn rrr,rt.IIPBOVhtrT UNLESS A IUIT.DINE ErRiIrt I,B IgSU[b ATD COUSTNUCTIOH ISflTANTED,
tt*No $FFLreAsrot{ Hrlrrr Br FnocEsslD rtl,rsottf oHilER.rs sxcflr?unE
[.EE
20,00
50.00
00.00
00. 00
00 ,00
00,00
a
"ru Q* *.*o=
o$ urxL,
RECAI1MD I
l'fEEf Itlc !
--*Ilrp Aspr.rcrf#Hifil", Bi AccrFrEDItHTtD ILIr IIQUISI f* *r*Y*o*SfroH t g abs*r[fen
DESSRIPtION T
revLard glilgt
RfC'0 uc,, ;i i,))Jc0tdR[.Do
,JUne f I,
o
Sa
IEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT_ BLOCK _ SUBDTVTSION S.D.D. #5, final phase
STREET ADDRESS: 1100 N. Frontage Road, Vail
DESCRIPTION OF FROJECT:L9 Condominium units with 4 type III E.H.Urs
and meetln
NA},IE OF PROJECT:
Lisr oF MATEBTALS
voy Viilas
The following information isReview Board before a final
A. BUILDING MATERTAIS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall MateriaLs
' Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rail_s
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash EncLosures
Greenhouses
Other
reguired for submit,tal to the Designapproval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
E.P.D.M. with gravel ballqst Natural gray
1xT&Gcedar cabott #0142
Cabott #0142
l.,lhi te
wood -ThTte
P'ipe rai 1
Painted metal Whi te
1xT&G cedar - caEott #ot+z
Wood sidinq --*lao sedar Cabott #0144
B. LANDSCAPING:Name of Designer: Niels LuncefordPhone: 46R-0340
PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Narne CommoLName OqErnt,itv Size*
pRoposED TREE5 Picea Pungens Spruce 10 10'-12'
27 6'-10'
Popu'lus tremuloides Aspen 70 2"-3%" cal .
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
Mal us " Rad'i antll F1 oweri ng crab 10 2" cal ..ToTilfii-s-ffimTT'a1a -lt?f-dftofiIi,ood-t-2 *
Pjcea Pungens
(to ne relocated)
Spruce 3"-4" diam.,
g'-12' ht.
*Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Mininurn caliper fordeciduous treei is 2 inches. rndicate hmtrees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet.
Cedar sidin Cabott #0144
PLANT MATERIATSa gggtnlEafName Common Hime ouantitg
PRoPosED st*]s Potentilla Fruricosa P ti l]a 34
Ri bes Aureum
Corpus Sericea Red-Twig Dogwood
Cotoneaster Acuti,folia Cotoneaster_j 5 ga1.
Si ze*
5 ga1.
Gol den Cument 5 gal. min,
5 gal.
Rosa foetida .Harrison's Rose 20 5 gal.
samhucu.s pubens Red-berry elOgl----lj- 5 gal.
of proposed shrubs. l4inimurn size of shrubs is
Tvpe Square Footaqe
F]owerinq.Mixed perrenials 26 flats
Bl uegrass all disturbed areas
IL
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size5 qaIIon.
GROUND COVERS
soD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
erosion control mats at all slopes exceeding 3:1
C. LANDSCAPE TIGHTING: ff exterior }ighting is proposed, please
show the nurirber of fixtures and Jocations on a separatelighting plan. Identify each fixture from the light,ing plan
on the List below and provide the lrattage, height abovegrade and type of llght proposed. ,
Bollards at drive
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wal]s, fences, swinmingpools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwalls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback is3 feet.. Maximum height of waLls elsewhere on the propertyis 5 feet
Concfete retaining walls - board form.
n
I
PLEASE MAKE CHECK
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPA RT;\{ENT OF COJVIMUNITY DEVELOP}IENT'
SALES ACTION FOR:\,7. 75 SOUfII FRONTAGE ROAD
AIL, fPLORADO 8I657
0t 00004t510 ZC\T{C .{'J\D ADDRE5S TIAP}'
0l 0c004?415 uNr.ro L\ { I uilDtr.''o co D E
UMFOL\{ PLUT{BbIG CODE0l 0000 .{2415
0l 0000 42.1 I 5 .l u,.nron-n.t :trecH,r.$cAL coDE
0t co00{2{15 UNIFOfu\{ EIRE CODE
0l 0000 12i l5 N,\1'] ONAL ELECTRJCAL CODE
0t 0000 J21 t5 OT'IiER CODE }OOKS
0 t c000 .il 54s BLUE PRl|{TS (IIY1;R
0l 0'300 r24 t 2 | >:f nOX COPE5 / s'iUDIls s0.25
0t 00c{{2371 PENA I.TY FE ES / R E.I,..\'S PECTI ONS
0l 00c0{t332 i pL,tvREvtErvRE.c}.lEcKFEE, ls{oFER,HR.I
0t co00 423?1 OFF ]JOURS T\iSPECT]ON FEES
0l 000041il2 CONT}L\ CTORS L]CL\S ES F[,ES
0l 0cr00 { 1330
.0t 0000414r3 SICN APPLICAI]ON FEE
0t 00004t4t3 ADDITICTNAI,SIGNACE Fi,E tSl.0.l,)ER
0t ccEc421-10 llTcARTpFoJEcTDONAIION
PRE PAJD DESIGN REVIEIV EOARD FEE
0l 0000424T2 | nurr.ornc-c0NsTRucTroN PERMTT cot{puTER D
'01 0000 41010 TAX
01 0000 42371 TNVESTTGATTON FEE (BUTLDTNG) I 'To"AL
our,
0l 0000{1330
0l 0000.1t3-i0 lE''(TERI
0l gJoo d 1330,I330' ISPECLALDEVELOPI
TO
P.O. Box 409
113 E. 4th Street
EAGLE, COLORADO 81631
(303) 32A6368
Vrerz, Ca fiir7
wE ARE $ENDING You Settcrreo B tffier s€parate cn'€r via
+*.-' 'n
TTRANSMOTTTTAL
Mzz,a.r
I-o*endvs
tr Shop dravrings
tr Copy ol letter
(Prints
tr Cftan€B odet
Il Saupb
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked belo/v:
tsFor approval
{
E For your use
E As requested
C For review and comment
tr FOR BIOS DUE
n Approved as submitted
E rApproved as notd
tr Returned for conections
n Resubmit * . copies for approval
D Submit-copies for distribution
. fl Return correc'led prints l
U
19- N PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
a3r''e-8._/*.(
a-z/-
@ ,0" *"ct*n* coddn . 1096 Poqt{,o.l6unsr coobnl
PfttD!fiao l@|'f,,Eur k ot4il.ft aoaro.uirt afE- not .t noto.t, kat dtt ndiry w ,t o''ca'
FTRE FLOW
WORK
REQUTREMEN:I
SHEET
DAnE: /6////7/?g
NAI'IE OF PROJECT:
TOCATION OF PROJECT:
owNER / DEVELOIER:
TOTAr BUILDTNG SQ. FT., ?4:-aa sQ,Fr
/
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTfON: (l-991 UBC \ fr
BUTLDING SPRTNKLERED/UNSPRINKLERED :0!sPt?)t/ frLenE)
coNTAcr PHoNE # : sZE- #A{
,/a)
FI,OT{ DEMAND:2{oo GpM. DURATToN:
# OF HYDR.ANTS:!?AVERAGE SPACING:
MAX. DISTANCE FROM HYD. TO STREET OR ROAD: ZL{ TT.
NOTES:
l-- HRSFTRE
MIN.
FIRE AnEA |rqulr. (..0
FIRE
FLOW(grllo.t ,
mloul.)
FLOY'
ouR4TroN
(hout3,
TYp.
[.F.Rl
TYF
U O.|.-ltR
ul O.I+.HR!
lYgt
tv+Lr-
v-Ooo-KB.l
TYP.
fl-H
llt-Nr rYgr
* rzJoQ
30,200:
38Jop
48300
59,000
?0,900
12,700
l'r,000
?r300
?4,200 .
33200
39,700
. 8,200
10,900. 12,900
l?,400
2t.300
2t500
5,900
7.9@' 9,8m
12,600.
15,4@
18,4m
1,600
4,800 i'
6.200
7,7@
9.400
Jm
I,J@
1.750
?.000
' 2,250
2,5@
!,, t )u
2
81.?00
9?JW
.l12.?00
128.?00
gz. r'oo
54.900
63,100
77,W
30. r00
35,?00
40,600
46,4m
2r,800
25.900
29JAJ
33J00
.13,400
15.600
t 8,000
20,600
3,000
3,250
3J00
3,750.
J
| 45,900'lu2&
r 83.400
203,7W
.225,2N
24't;t@
27 t,2&
295.900
":**
;
82.100
92.400
" r03.t00' I 14.6@
t26.7&
r39y'00
t52.ffi
r 66J@
Grca{cr
.:
::
52500'59.t00
66,@
73,300
81. t00
89,200
9?Joo
106.500
I15.800
| 25,500
135,500
145.800
156,?00
167,9@
179,4@
t91,400
6rcatcr
37,9CO
42J00
41.1&
53.000
58,600
65,400
?0.600
7?,000
83.?@.
90.600
9?,900
r06.800
r 13.200
|2t,300
129,(&
118.300
Grcatcr
23.300
26,300
?9.300
32,600
36.000 '
39,600
43,400
47,4CO
51.s00
55J00
60.?00
64,800
69,600
74.600
?9.8@
85.100
6tcatct
4.@0
4,250
{.500
4,?50
5.000
5.500
5 J50
6,000
6.?50
6.500
6.750
?.(t00
7,250
?,500
7,7 5Q
8.000
. TABLE NO. A.[l_4-l
MINIMUM FEOUIREO FIREFLOW ANO FLOW DURATION FOR BUILDINGS
rTypcs ofconstructioo arc ba;cd !p;n rhc Building Codc.
TABLE NO. A-III.B.1
NUMBER ,AND DISTRIEUTION OE FIRE HYORANTS
lRcducc by 100 fcct for dcad<M skccir or road5.
lWhctc sucrs uc providcd with mcdian dividcrs which car bc crosscd by nrcfighrcrr pull-
iog horc lincs, or artcrial st'ccts r& providcd wirh four or morc trafficJancs aod havc a
traffic counr o( more tlun 30,000 yihiclcs Fl day, hydranr spacing shall avcragc 50O lccr
on cach sidc of thc rrt't and bc urangcd on an altcmtting basis up to a firc-flow rcquirc.
' mcnt of ?,000 galtoos fr.r minurc ind 40O fccr for highci frc-flow rcguircmcncr.
lWhcrc nct, watcr malns arc cxtcndcd along Jrc€G whire hydraJlts r-rc not n(cdcd for p.o-
tection of struciurcs or similar lirc problcms, firc hydrants shall bc P.ovided at no( lcsr lban
1.o0o-foor spacing to providc for E .nsponariofl harardi.
'Rcducc by 50 fccr for dcad-cnd strccc or roads-
tOnc hydnnt for cach 1.000 gallonr pcr minutc or fraction thcrcof.
FIBE.FLOW
REOUIREUTI.'T(op-l
utMuull
NO. OF
HYOR-'.I{TS
AVERAGE SPACINO
sE-nvEEt{
HYORA}{TS |!
(FL}
. U.,,XIUUM DISTANCE FROII
HYORAXT TO ANY PO${T OH
STREET OR ROAO FFONTAGE'
(Fr.l
l.?50 or lcss
?,000.?,?50
?,500
3.000
3,500<,000
4J00-5,000
5500
6,000
6,500-?.000
?,500 or morc
I
2
.D
D
7
8 or morJ
500
4J0
450
400
300
300
250t(n
200
250
225
225
125
2r0
r80
t80
150
150
l?0
fn wofnff,
\
$o'..e ^Ja."-t- \
s*"r-y $-.
fn fuo nuk'fle '#&tu
g) ano--t a**^v {,, G.. ,t bv
Lail ,tt.f
,e;rK';7P',/ Z ?z'
flfltltf4
Retum \o f) 1'' 4N
Town Planner
6.* {o*)
fo+J utc-1s
$-to,.- S +uft+rb C,.& l.oL ) s; J<.D"noJ oiJ*r, flou-lJr,"
D'n'^o* '-')'rrta)
t^.., I
PROJECT:
DATE SU
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARI
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
b)
rbo-)
Wtrts
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
fr&ryrs ?b /4.*
fu& Nlr*
-E-=--.- rr rr
Reviewed dv, €i*"1 //a // out".
I
Lrc I
-, ri l1 t It; 'jno'td *+u"- p4 Jzr4r;".^. ,))h l"* rle,Ll,-- ?' /'
I<lit so t shu''l) ; ruul+,-) ttu,*- G;D.,-.^ $ro,-^ ?^-Lry L-,r+ ,J /b-2.- *r. ..
D*e Lr+, I h, /Z.b*,^-. /- "L" /o''.. a_L(e ,s
4 rlo-T^"h Dn'rn'.r' lr"loJ
l.'
J"-il"J
I fo'-')
?z t pr't
%u'f
i.vi.d I l|JCa
g) l*,t,Zzl u,-,.' I*-
6,rs'?3 tr"k-1 6- s
tp) No aao,--,
r _I
o,l * zotl{'/
€ [n v*l/'Da s 4.s .p*r J t* 5.r,
og s,t L,,.,, [J*i' fn' -'f'k'( t u"u^ / ttvT u'*"'^'k
lL)
ftva_x
s o.{ D.,.* , € sc_,t_J ,gy-I uS.r^-*-. ui, J"* zSX'% &{nJ,'- <*uz.J > zr / sr^-^* r'^ €xcass
o{- t:/
Il*I t't,
I
I
e*A
Zt t €xcas s
A Professional Corporat on
nrn,n !i ir 1 rnn?Hl-i w'' ,^ ' '.i'Y)
143 East Meadow Drive
Cro-ssroads at Vail
Vail, Colorado B 1657
303/476-5105
MonTeRARCHITECTS
Letter of Transmittal
Date:
To:
June21,1993
Mike Mollica
Town of Vail Community Development
Savoy VillasProject:
Please find enclosed the following:
Dated Copies
6t15t93 3 Revised Site Plan
Revised Landscape plan
Romarks:
lf you have any other questions or comments, please call.
The Lampiris letter should arrive tomorrow, and he said on the phone that
everything looks fine.
Thanks,
Sally Brainerd
A P rofcss onal Corporailon
143 East Meadow Drive
Crossroads at Vail
Vai , Colorado 81657
303,476,5105
MonTeRARCHITECTS
Letter of Transmittal
rlo:9;:
t..
i:a
*L
'<-*-
LlJCE
Town of Vail Community Development
Savoy Villas
Date:
lo:
Project:
June 15, 1993
Mike Mollica
Please tind enclosed the followtno
CoPies
6/15/93 3
Remarks:
of
Revised Site Plan ,^ ; ^;/h
fu.
Mike - a few responses to your review: - /"'u.'r- ' ffi #, ff
1) The owner does not see any o#1*,,'" ,o, mar<ifitne
pedestrian path public, for legal reasons.2) Trash for the townhome units below will be private pick-up. - ^^1,3)ThestaiMaysbetweenthebui|tdingarecovered,andnr**
therefore will need minimal snow storage space. 1-'----'--- d prfi4) | could not find any driveways over 8016. Do you still find them !
in this pfan? ,r*X ge
5) | believe I have gotten rid of all grading slopes over 2:1.*7y. --6) What are the spot elevations you need on the survey? oA,&-7) Since all of the uphill Lion's Ridge Loop runoff is collected into - : " "that one existing culved, we have rerouled that and provided drainage 6#r/ .
for it all theway across the site. Other off-site water will beminimal.8) Snow storage is as indicated.
lf you have any other questions or comments, please call.
1? '33 x6r e4 5A}lrfiXEo lSlEerres F. 1
{t'
A F5oaca{hrrd ccipotrthir
C,orq|lrdt d Vrll
l4S Erd lihdflr odvr
!bit, 6rbr ftelE 7
(r&tt4764r0s PHOIe
€m)476{7r0 FAX
MorweRARfl urrcr$
TELECOPIER TRAHSMITTAL SHEET
l,BArE q/l 14+ -
COMPANY
FAX#
Number of FsgFE sent Includlng eovcr pags
lf you receive an error In trrnsmitslon, pleaee call {S0$l {76.$105
s4.+
Jun. 1T '03 16r EF 4X515 ls cr i es
AFfA CO!tl|rTr|ElfT
FCIIEDUITL A -
5ff.ro F:t
- ehorgtr -
ALIIA Orrn6t Folltr
Our Order llo' tlltl0
tsr trntoroltlon Only
EIIEA BTTII
Sll5,00
StrIE r U0--S'9|IAIj--
I.
2.
r**rI{I[H Y9UR REDIITTAI$E PITEASE n[fEn TO OUn OXDEB tIO. ]|tr{0.tt**
1o-1'14Elfcotlv€ Dat6i trlrrraf cEr+tttr at gtoo A.!.
Pollcy to be ltausd, anrt lrrolloBed InruFEdt
frlbtNf ormgrts Follcy
1t87 &tvL;lon (A!!nd-d re90l
Fropoeed Inrursdl
TED
Ihr Betat€ or Lntffest l,n tba,lanC d$crlbed ot,,rsfftrtq to lnthia csnnltnrnt anfl covrrid hereln le:
l Fan pluBh
Tltlg to thr aetats sr lntrrcpt Euvtr*d har+ln le et thauffrctlvs data herrof vr3tsd lhr
ADtn PROPERTTEg, Iile., l' GBOI,OItr Conpontrloil
trhe 1etrd rsfcrrsd to in thls eoanltnent la datcrlbed erfallowe:
collDolall|lutl urlltr ]$tx, sruF] RUlt cotfDoulNlutt, tcconDlilc ro fitE
cgrrmurHrus llIF EEERE0F nmORDtD ttrurny 18, 1rE3 trf Eoolt lre
A$ PAGn 1S5 rurD BH! tIAsB EUSFDtfEilrlIJ Ulp RECORpID OC{dBsA'25f1983 IN FOOIT 3?I }T DAGE fi27 IND IE DEITTIID tr}Ib DEECNISED INT||! eonDotdlHru{ DEErrfilrIOH REC€nDBD itil,tul$f 18, 1t83 XN EO6X
SCt A$ FteE 154 ll|D TUDPIJI|S]|f THERSDO RECoEDDD lf0Vtll'|f,ffi ?,tgg3 llt DOOX t?l lE FIB! a6O, eOEmE Ol f,lOI/E, dFlf! OF
COISRADO.
EEd
3.
{.
s.
tte!
Jun. t? '93 xEreS EB8B 5HNTA8515| lseries r.3
f,LTA C0ililtr[tl!tl!
8CII@IIIJE E*'l.
(Rs{ulrGnrlrgll our grdar Htr' il1'o
rhc follostng lrl t-ha rrqulronent'r t'o DF sonPlL'd sltlrr
1. PFyEant to gr for the lEcoulF of tn' gtantDrt or-BoEtgtgcrs ef
tbr full conrriiiaiiS"-i6i-ilfi.-lr{iie'or lntsrrat ts br
Lnsurrd.
t. proper rhgtriEent(g) creltl$.!!t! g1lels--el I'ntsrsrt to bt
ln:ur*il rudt be exesutr{t ana duif iiria for slstrrcr toasltr
7, ETTIDENCE EITIBFAC:IORI BO trltl-cot{PAllv EHIT IltE-I.ERlis', conDt.tls{g AllD
FnorrsroNs or iiil-ltm-or-iirrl. rfriTiriit -irtr -rrvs *til ElrrtrllD'
{. maelttl[l ssED FROtt AD]n sRoFEHlrtrg' tlfc' ' t GEOnErt conFOnrstos' Eo E&D
cowrvrra sulJEC[ FROPSnTE'
trrrs couHlru ctrERK tilD nEcoBDEFq OqrIcE ncggTRES RElrURil
iijpnisiEe oN Dduiiicntii-irnt-ron Rrcongilcl I
PIGE A
E5-15-1S93 A3:4EPl4 FREl'I 4?9245.2 F.AZ
'l'H r: l.ire C)t:t:ti:l?s clr
\flear, Roscn {r l}alers
A IA (1 fi t. * )r I p O tr pt{ LlF titi i i}tii l C'.r*t,trRl Il r,rsS
Itlotl !q!,lJ rr liu('r\'iA!!rl *r-r/!ll Y/l:Gr. e tilTl: j!O0
VA ., L',-1 r.(] rrA I x) S l {r57
'f r; rc rr rt" x ri {rl03i 47h.764f'
l:AIrilMll-]: iJ03) *70-7 | l\5
June 15, 1993
Tswn of vail
?5 S. Frantage Fd. Wvail, co 81657Attn, uichael tdolliea
Bc: $avov Vill*s
Daer tlilrel
I]his letter wilt donstitut. natice to the Town af vaiL
that the Board oi Directore of the Simba Run condoniniun
Assseiation trrlena no oppocltlon ts, nor action to prevent'. t-he
driveway aede6a, regr'a-ding and r-€dralnage, modifieation of
iinaesaiin.J, and seilignmlnt of utilitioa planned for t.Lc
;ilil;-dil-'6ip"nJio" proiect hnown as the savov. virlae' rhis
p"ififbn of -the nsaiO is *u5Ject to thc condition that tho
l"iii* p"oJect is incorjoratdd into Siuba Run Condqtrlniuus,
ii-su5jict-to arf coventnts govec'irtg -$1nUa qun _endr, as sucll'
ilf- -or.io.r* in Savoy Villal are neirbers of ttre Slmba Run
Condominiurn .*.Esociation'
If you have any qluegtionsr PLease do noE hesltate ts sall
me.
tlR&o
TO
Junre* l{. \feat
Ficl "t l 11 Rn on
Rtchaxl l). 'li'Erzrru
#il;ffi
$richara D. fravers
Rxrr/skg
ec:' $imba Run Concla$inium Assocl-ation
/bodeinbs. ac
|ll1itlrirntr'N^r (.,1r,t,r\r.,/.tr.\rirjt Wri,,,{ +f.l\t\.tirt, l',!. AiI il]\!|tr}:l !it\;1.s, t,.(:
TNTfl P.ft?
a6_15_1993 E3:4EPN hJR&tFRO14 TO 479245.? P.El
?T,rr: l.Aq $rf t!'f i .*t'
\t/ear, Roser:. €+ fiavers
,\ P,\RTlirN jlJtr tt' Irnlrr jEr.*r^r, ( irrr.[a f rr'.\..i
I ti{X} .i.\r'T:l F lii's:,\r',i N\a.\!} \\'r: i r,' F \'t t'! :0tl
\..\t1.. C'.\t ,r,,,t.\ tt,. i..,I IriiTiit :ii'ttq'5 1, {503) +: 6':6+fiF.ril t:'r tt ! !3L1]| +-Jtr.71I.q
TsLEg- SFI EF f BAI-SIIr?TAL
, N*r( ,tlk ftfryJamcs R. Wclr
ti"l,o'J P E,r"*,.
R;chotd D Tiovcr;
ltike l{ollica
DATE:
TO:
FROI{:
TELECOPY
Rick Travers
479-2452
476-7646CONFIRM #
99ERATOR Eileen 'Jacobe
T{s arc scnding you E page teleeoFy (includinE this eovcr
page) " If you do not rec€ive all sf the Fages, or erlcoqnter 6nydifficulties vith this transmiscion, Fleosc call our office at
(303) 4?6-7646 iffiiediat€ly. Thank you.
Required Action:
Additional Co:rmentsr
* ****************************************************************
IHIS ![E$SAGE Ig INT'ENDSb O$LY FER T$E USE OF TI{E INDIVIbUAI OR
ENITTY ?O WHIAN IT IS ADDRESSED AND I'IAY CONTAIN INFORIIATION THATIS FRTVILEGED. COHFTUE}ITIAI. AT.ID EXE!{PT FRO}I DISC'JO8TfiE UI{DER
APPITICABLE LAIE. ff the readcr of thlE Beseaqe le not the intendedrecipicnt or the eaployee or agent roFponglble for deliverinE tlre
meEsage to,the intehded reeipient, you are hereby notlfied that anydiEseuination, dietributton or copylng of thtrs dou$unication isstrictly prohibited. If you have received this cofirsunication inerror, please notlfy us irmediately by telephsne (eollect) r €Irdreturn the orlEinal lneasage to us at the above address via thc U.S.Postal $ervlce. Thank you.
Prrrr:r,i!j!.srL L\,a[!\1x.\rt.] \-j U'i^|i fl TN{\.flir, r.f, A".'r) Rl(,r .rrrrr Jr, H".*r:, f.f-.
B6-11-1993 A3:EEFt,1
.. .I
,,
FRBI'I tJR&
o Post.lt " brand lax'^miltal memo 76fl # of pages )
toSell., Br*u.I tt /tlr(e t"lolltcnCo. \,co' T'ov
Depl.Phone #
"r 4?6- o?to
l lllj LiY, iTIr/ r-!wcar, I\'oge
A lr^ I'tri I R$ tt It or p*o rr
I t)Of; $ouT11 ),'Ei)x 1. ri ri
V,t t 1., {.kr i,qr'l'li t.!r Ptll'!ii (-F^..'...tultt: i3
J*nes R, '$fuar
Rfuh+r'l B Ror.r.
,ls,rfllOr(l lrt I!dvurE
dulre 1I, 199;t
Town of ValI75 S. FrontaEe Rd, W.Vall, CO S1657Attn. Kristen prita
Re: Savoy Villas
Dear lrts. PrLtr !
_ It is ny und.efstanding frou dieaueeione Hith thecleveroper of savoy villae that the project has been redesi,grnedes that ns eneroachmgnt exists on tne sinbJ Run comnon area.Aeeordingly, the Bo*rd of Direetor* of the .Biuba RrrnCondoniniun Assoaiation has no objection to the proposeddevs].op![.nt.
If you have any queetione, please dotrrt heeitate to ca]"lile.
pruly yourg
,A,{
Richard D. Travers
RDr/efjcct slmba Run conctonlnlun &sroclatton
/bodginb4.ds
Tr{nr'tisst":}xAl, (:.1rr',)r^r!\r\s: w[,\tr ttr ].t rr
TETAL P.E2
r a6-tt-1993 a3:ffiPf'1 FR0f4 4?9743? P.€1
f tts L.\$' LalirFlc:.- rir
\Fear, Rosett B Tiavers
,\ P,t t" r r; p ; 11 1 1',. t' Pn*r r l ; j t r.s A1. t' ra r pr. A.tT t,-r s !l{t00 5\1l t FH..r-T,rir li(\,\:t $i'titT, Sl.tTt -l t}\1tL. d,\r *.IA!r,. F,1 fiS7
T E Lr I'rtr;r i (30:r) +t6.70+6
F'tt i t)r:Lt; (ip3) +70.71i d
)r',* R. \i'i:ar & \ l" ^ 0O" ',
h^\P
n"J a^uRiclrarrl P Ro*t'n TELEcgpTER TBAN'IdJ-TTAIJ t\i' ,r./N tt
richar<lrlRo*pn rELEcoprEx rRAlrsldrrrAL hntn i;J ^l^Y',NpFchrrlf).r,r,"*,. w 'i";5i9J'.'v.'rs 1i1_1ury;rUr'fl'' /nt t Mlj "'"\t ',t, rlP\DATE: __ June 1,1. t993 , M\ilo,
has-"
FROl.t; Richard D- Trnvere L[fJ -FRol.t; Eighard p. sravers ,, .. tf*lY,l
Lo,l '.' ..
TELEcopv # 479-z4sz ,. .. to.l '^'r, ..,
I t' f\)L '' \CONFIRII # )v '"_,ntd.
OPERAToR EileeF Forte-J4cgbs P^WII -,d /
:-j- - vq 99 v!.Yvgc . ..r | ,,0
W€ af€ sending you a z page teleeopy (inclurlirrq Llris eover H
htR&o Tu
w€ af€ Eending you a 2 , page teleeopy (includirrg Llris eover ' \p?q?I. If you do not receive all of the'badres, or encounter anydifficultiee with this tranomissjep, preasC c;all our offlce ai lln"]'L(303) 476'7646 inrrediately. Ihantr you. ,l\X't'r ' \rr\4 |Requircd Action: gitlria
Addltional Couurrents ;
*****.**,*,****r*****************cs**********fi***********:r************
rHrs MESSAGE rs TNTENDED oNI.,Y FoR THE UsE oF IHE INDIVTDUAIJ oRENTIS{ TO WHIC}T TT X8 ADDRESSED AI{D Ii!AY COI|TAIN INFOR}'ATION THATIS PRIVIIJECED, CONFIDEhITIAIJ AIID EXE!'IPT FRO!{ DTSCIOST]RE T'NDEN
AFPLTCABIJE LAIs. rf tbe reader of this ileEBaEe Ls not thc intendedreclpient or the ernSr_loyee or.agent responsid'ieJof ctetivering theDeEsaEe to-the intendi_d recipient, you are herrby not-if ied ttraf anycllsseruinatl-on. distribution or copying of thli connunicatlon tiEtrtctly prohibited. rf you have-iec6ivea trris connuni.cation i.nirror, please notify ue innediately by telephone (collect). andreturn the original neeeage to us at the atrovdaddreee via the u.s-Postal Service-. Th;ntr Fu-.
-";-18-'93 THU t1!24 IDr ,lA4-963-8183 TEL l'{B:164
lDrlouae L. Wrulr*.rvrB, P. C.
,MfA4*q,ef gaa"
g06 WEST CROoAN EEA,ETlf,
LItWRI:b{CE\/ILI& eBORorA so6rr
963-81S3
o
H5B5 PE1
F x. (,rro.) sa.or8sTgL. (4o{} gits-osoo
NIJUI}ER OT FAGES IO IioIJLoIf THIS €IIEET I
DAIII:
TtIISi TRANF'I.{ISSION IS FOR:
n-Pl nnne.r
COIiPANY:
PHOH}.':
PAXr
THIS
RE;
f Cornnrrrri f V Tlprrel nt frtr ?nsn of V,ql i , Colntndn
?l
--_ 3Q3-47s-3t112 " -
TR.hNSI-IIS$ION IS FROM:
4'-CI62b
PitONE;_- t404) _g.gj:gJ.g_q
FAX!
gPECIAL ]TNSTRUCTION$:firn tbat. qE per Fry convereetion vlch you todav
Run ot 3DD#5 Amendneut or eny retter rel eted
, Frt f6I.Jul? "Il- llgl Lf rJtv$*lc€r-rgJri d lls:ejn tq not lorr€q! dr lf thet6 1r any
clrtrgs in reAerd to thi.q_Eubi rcLdjr_t ter , sequeelie herrrlit! nodc thgt_ yau conloec !c
***t*Thia l,nforraatir:n ie 1lrleuderJ for Che UEe O! the 4Sgyg-ggpElptred edd,feSSag Onty.Al'1 inforrnatLon co$talried wir-hirr Lhls !ac81ei1€ is legatty privllogrd ana contfiJnirar,thourd so&loErc stlter tlra' the lntended addres€ee xeeeirre rhte facslnlle, preae- [e -
odvlscd thdt ariy rlSsscrtruu L loa, copyltg or use ot this llrtoftiatio$ ls proirlbtted.rf you EGEEIvFU LLis Llausmlsslon 1r eirou, hlndry notity ou, oiflce "il-il;6li;dcstrol this tefEcupy. *,t***
\
A Prof essional Corporation
143 East Meadow Drive
Crossrcads at Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
3031476 5105
MoTUTRARCHITECTS
Letter of Transmittal
Date:
to:
Project:
June 9, 1993
Mike Mollica
Town of Vail
Savoy Villas
fiEct.lul; ; ; 6;
Community Development
Please lind enclosed the following:
Dated Copies
6/14/e3 I
Mike
d"asement property.
we will also relocate the water
Revised Landscape Plan
Revised Vicinity Plan
Revised Site Plan
the final solution. here to eliminate all buildin from
vgr,idino access across that
line onto easement, if that is necessary.
Please let me know if you need anything else. A letter from the
Condominium Association at Simba Run should be forthcoming, if you do not already
have it. We are shooting for the June 28 PEC meeting.
Sa=lly Brainerd
J UEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development
May 24, 1993
A request for a major amendment to sDD #5 to allow for the development of
the rdmaining portibn of fre Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas,localed at 1100
North Frontage Road and descdbed as follows:
Thst part ol the Flrst supplem€mel Map lor slmbe Run Coocbnlnlum, 8cconnrE to lhs m4
thereof r€coded ln the ifilc€ of the Eegl€ County, Colora<lo, Gle.ft end Flecoder' elescrlbed as
iolloats:
Beginning at the rnost gonthflesterly corner of sald map, theirco the follou,lng three ooutsec slong
rt
"-w"tritty
lines of eaid map; l) NO3"33'OI'E 160.79 feet;2) NI?5O'33'E 1'14-'72 t€€t; 3)
N17oS6'Og;70.60 feet; th€nce, departing said wsstsrly lin€, S13'16!3nV 157.26 t€€t thsnce
S76.43.S7.E 91.SO SEet; rhEnce HiS.te;Og'E 95.00 l€€t; thsnc€ S76"49'5fE 72.31 {ed to rh€
easterly line ol said map; thenco tho lolldving t$,o courses alorq th€ easterly and soLdhoist6tly
lines oi said map; 1) S24'44'57'E 52.38 feet;2) S52"5OZS'W 272.5gleet !o t113 Poifl ot
Beginning, containing 0.6134 *res, more or less; and
That parf ol Simba Run, according to the map thermf, recorded in Book 3'12 at Page 763 In the
Oltice ot th€ Eagle Celnry, Colorado, Clelk and R€corder, dsscdb€d as follsto:
Beginning at the mosr souherly corner ol said Simba Run, thonce the lollon ing tour coulsas abng
$isouttivesto1y and nodhwesterly lines of said Simba Run; 1) N37'09ts1W 23328 feet; 2)
334.57 feet aloni ttre arc of a curvl b the left, having a radius of 1711.95ieet, a central angls of
10049,06., and Jchod rhat b€ars N42.1320'E 334.07 l€€t; 3) N36'4848' E 201.36 feel; 4) 15.9€
lEel along the arc of a curue to the ,ight, having a radius ol 428.02 feet, a central angle of
0?08'12;, and a chord that b€ars N3?'52',54' E '15.96 feet lo E corner on the westedy boundary cf
the First d.rpptemental Map for Simba Run Condominium, aceotding to the map thereof r€corded In
the otlice of the Eaglo County, Cohrado, Clerk and Recod€r; thonee the tollordtg lour cot tses
elong said westorly-boundary; 1) S21"5128"W 69.90 teot; 2) S17'56'03W 141.17 fed;3J
512o5o'33"W tu.tZtea:4) So3c33'O1W 160.79leet to tho southEasterly line of sald Slimba R,tn;
thence, along said southeasterly lin6, s5r50'29'W 113.08 tod ro the Pcint ol Beginning,
conlainirE 1.560 acres, more or less.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land CorporationAA/alid Said
Mike Mollica
I. PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The property owner and applicant, Simba Lanrl Corporation, is-Pqu9*Ig ? maiq'S?P.. -ameirdmenifor the remairiing phase ol Special Development District f5 {Simba RunA/ail Run).
fne property is tocated at 1i0b North Frdntage Road and is bounded by the Timber Ridge
nparimdntsio the west, the North Frontage Road and lnterstate 70 to the south, Phasa I of
Simba Run to the east and Lionsridge Loop Road to the north.
o o
Ordinance #6, Series of 1976, originally established SDD #5 and set the parametersJotFe
development of the Vail Run Building. Ordinance #29, Sedes of 1977, amended SDD #5.
This amendment expanded the SDD with the addition of 6.3 acres immediately to the west of
Vail Run and in addition, divided the sDD into what is now known as Development Area A
(Vail Run) and Development Area B (Simba Run). The development slandards for boh areas
rer" sp"iiticalry stipulated in this ordinance. SOD #5 was further modified by the passage of
Ordinahce #33, Series of 1978, and Ordinance #24, Series ol 1985.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The proposed development plan for the tinal phase of Development Area B, in SDD #5,
consists of twenty condominiums and four deed-restricted employee housing units. The
devilopment pan calls for one four-unit townhouse building to be tocated on fte southem
portion of the property, with access immediately olf of the North FronAge Road. The
irorthem deveiopmeni of the property woub Aie access from LionSridge Loop and would..
consist of four, iour-unit conObmjnium builctings and one, four-unit employee housing buildlng.
Two curb cuts are proposed off of Lionsridge Loop.
on the northem bench of this site, each condominium is proposed to have a one-car garage,
and on the lower, or southem part of this site, each condominium would have a lwo-car
garage.
This final phase of the sDD will be part of the existing simba Run Condominium Association'
and as such, will have access to all of the existing recreational amenities located in the
existing Simba Bun project. These recreational amenities include three outdoor tennb courts'
tr"o inioor racquetratt dourts and one indoor swimming pool. Vail Run has its own outdoor
swimming pool and two indoor tennis courts.
The SDD departs from the approved development standards in the following areas:
.sile coverage
.enclosed Parking
This project site is located within a high severity rockfall-geologic hazard zone. The
apptiiani's consulting geologist, Nicholas l-ampiris, has compteted a geologic Investigation for
tild property. The oiiginal stuOy ts dated April 18, 1993, the updated study is dated May 18'
1993 and both are attached to this memorandum.
2
t
1il.ZONING ANALYSIS
Listed below is the zoning analysis for Develooment Area B. located in SDD #5 (Phase I includes the two exlstlng Simba Hun
h.rildings):
Sita Area:
S€lbac*sr
H€lght
GRFA:
lrrlb:
Emdoyee
D{,slling Units:
"Sito Co€rag€:
Iandscadng:
*Parking:
APPRO{'ED OEV.
SIANDAFF
6.3 acrssl274,428 6q. fl.
20' - all pedrnobr
propsrly fineg
tt5'
129,000 6q. ft. - DU's
10,000 sq. ft. - EHU'3
139,000 6q. ft
r39
lO (min.)
54,886 sq. ft. (a)%)
161,667 sq. h 160e6)
85% endos€d
PHASE I
DEV. AREA B
4.7 acr€sn04,732 sq. ft
20' - ell p€dmobt
property lines
20- 60'
90,807 sg. i.
4,601 sq. lL
95,408 Eq. ft.
95
6
65,089 sq. ft. (24%l
I I 6,30? sq. h (4296)
128 errlosed (95%)
6 surfaca
Commerdd ftea: $
t34
+
' Indudc i,292 Bquare lbet ot limb€r ftdge's ecbm-fiost buildng.
" The yopooed proioot d€pens fmm hee epprowd dewlement slrndafdg.
REMAINING DEV.
POTENNAL AFTER
PHASE ICONST.
it/A
N/A
N/A
38, l9S 6q. ft.
5,399 sq. ft.
t13,592 sq. tl.
4
4
<10,2Ot1 sq. tt>
<48,355 sq, ft.>
wA
N/A
PHASE II
lgLAnEA_q
1.6 .crr!/69,696 rq. fL
20' - rll prlmrlct
proprrly lln r
28. tl3'
33,881 rq, ft
1.536 rq. fr.
36,{20 .q. fi.
m
4
r1fB18 q. ft.(7r1
5itt2g q, ft. (lgt6)
24 .iclo!.d ({7t3,
27 |urhcc
51
+
TOTAL
OEV. AREA B
6,3 ed€6
N/A
luA
124,6gr sq. ft
7.137 so. ft
131,828 sq. ft
115
t0
84,002.q. ft (31%)
169,6tt1 sq. n {62%)
15a ondos€d €e!6)
Stl 3rrfaoa
185
+
IV. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the purpose of special development districts is to:
'... encourage flexibility and creativity in lhe development of land in order to
promote its most appropriate use; lo improve the design character and quality
ol new development within the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical
provision of streets and ulilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features ol
open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as statEd
in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan lor a special
development distrisl in conjunction with a property's underlying zone distric't,
shall establish the raquirements for guiding development and uses of prop€rty
ineluded in the special development district.'
The following are the nine special development district criteria to be utilized by the Planning
and Environmental Commission when evaluating SDD proposals:
A. Deslgn compatlbllity and sensltlvlty to the lmmedlate envlronment,
nelghborhood and adlacent propertl$ relatlve to archltectural deslgn,
scale, bulk, bulldlng helght, buffer zones, ldentlty, character, vlsual
htegrlty and orlentatlon.
The original design plan for the final phase of the Simba Run development proposed
one large building on this Phase ll site. This building was designed to be similar to the
existing Simba buildings located immediately to the east. These buildings are
approximately 260 feet in length and approximately 50 feet in width. The project was
designed lo take access off of Lionsridge Loop (one curb cut) wih a tairly large surface
parking area, as well as one level of underground (structured) parking.
The current proposal before ihe PEC suggests a series of six smaller buildings.
Access is divided between the North Frontage Road and Uonsridge [oop, and the
parking for the project is almost equally divided between enclosed parking and surfacs
parking. Architecturally, the design is very similar to that of the existing Simba Run
project, although smaller in scale.
The staff believes that the applicant has done a reasonable job with the overall site
planning of the project to insure the project meets this criterion. W€ feel that the mass
of the proposed buildings creates a transition from the existing Simba Bun buildings to
the east, which are upwards of 60 feet in height, and the existing Timber Ridge
buildings to the west, which are approximately 30 feet in height. The four
condominium buildings proposed on he northern or upper bench of this site, are in
keeping with the multi-family character of the neighborhood, with sacft building
consisting of four dwelling units. The employee building to the east also consists ol
four dwelling units. The lower bench ol this site is designed lo accommodate four
attached townhomes, also meeting the multi-family definition. The townhomes have
been shifted slightly to the west lo increase the distance betrrveen the existing Simba
Hun building.
B. Uses, actlvlty and denslry whlch provlde a oompatlble, efflclent and
workable relatlonshlp wlth surroundlng uses and actlvlty.
It ls the statf's position that the proposed residential use on the site is compatible with
the existing uses on surrounding propedies. The proposed d€nsity (numbers of units)
as also compatible with adiacent properties and would be ln conformance with the High
Density Residential identification that the Tolvn of Vail Land Use Plan has placed on
this proper$. The proposal meets the technical definition of a multi-family proiect. We
also believe it is positive that four employee housing units are incorporated into the
development.
C. Gompllance wlth the parklng and loadlng requlrement8 as outllned In
Chapter 18.52.
The Town's parking requirements indicate that a total of fory-six parking spaces arc
required for this Phase tl site. The appticant has proposed a total of fifty-one parking
spaces for the proiect. The ratio of enclosed versus surface parking spaces is
approximately a fifty-fifty split, although the overall enclosed parklng percentage for the
entire Development Area B would be slightly less than the required 85%. Please see
the Zoning Analysis on Page 3 of this memorandum for the specific numbers.
Although this Phase ll development does technically meet the Town's parking
requirements, the staff would like to point out that the upper bench of the development,
when analyzed individually, would be one parking space short. Additionally, the lower
bench of the development provides six 'excess* parking spac€s. The staff would
recommend that one additional parking space be added to he upper development
area, at the west end ol the site, so that adequate parking is available in close
proximity to units the parking is intended to serve. We teel that this additional Farking
space can be added without significant modifications to the site plan or excessive
grading.
D. Conformlty wlth appllcable elements of the Vall Comprchenslve Plan,
Town pollclEs and Urban Deslgn Plans,
1. The Town of Vail Land Use Plan identifies this area as Hlgh Density Reeidential
(HDR). High Density Residential is defined in the Land Use Plan as follows:
'The housing in this category would typically
consist of multi-floored structures with densities
exceeding fifteen dwelling units per buildable acre.
Other activities in this category would include
private recreational facilities, and private parking
facilities and institutional/public uses such as
churches, tire stations and parks and open space
facilities.'
The proposed plan for the final phase of Simba Run would set the overall
density for Development Area B at 18.9 dwelling unitVacre.
The following are the applicable Land Use Plan goals and policies which relate
to this proposal;
Goal 1.1 Vail should continue to gro'v in a controlled environmenf
maintaining a balance between residential, comrnercial and
recreational uses to serve both the visitor and permanent
resident.
Goal 1.12 Vail should accommodate most ot the additional growth in
existing developed areas (infill areas).
Goal 5.1 Additional resldential growth should continue to occur pdm*ily in
existing, platted areagand as approprlate in nwv areas where
hlgh hazards do not exist.
God 5.3 Atfordable employee housing should be mads avallable through
private efforts, assisteO by limited incentives, provided by the
Town of Vail, wifrt appropriate restrictions.
Goal 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the market place
demands for a full range of housing types'
Goal 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be
accommodated at varied sites throughout the community'
The stafl believes the project is in compliance with the Town's Land Use Plan.
ldentlflcatlon and mltlgatlon of natural and/or geologlc hazards that affect
the property on whlclrthe speclal development dlstrlct ls proposed'
This proiect site is located within a high severity rocklall hazard zone. The applicanfs
geologisi, Nicholas Lampiris, has reviewed the proposed site plan lF.las agreed that
ltre Ujrming atong Lionsridge Loop Road (south side), combined with. inlema] miUgation
for the two-eastern-most buildings, is sutficient to mitigate the rockfall hazard. Please
see the athched letters from tliiholas Lampiris at the end of this memorardum.
F. Slte plan, bulltllng deslgn and locatlon and open space prcvlslons
cleslgnecl to produce a iunctional development responslve and sensltlve
to niturat feitures, vegetatlon and overalt aesthetlc quallty of the
communlty.
The stafi believes that the applicant has been responsive to frts PEC's suggestions
reggrding minor modificationl to the site plan. We believe that tre minor shifting made
to'tre bu-ilding locations has resulted in maintaining adequate distancoq between fie
Phase ll project and the existing Simba Run building. The project would continue to
exceed lne 20o/o maximum site coverage for Development Area B, however, thg stafi
believes that the overall site planning for the project is acceptable and that 8te
proposed 317o site coverags is reasonable given the approved density. All of the
building locations have been sited to take advantage of views both to the east and to
the wesl. The site plan has also been modified lo accommodate the needs of fire Vail
Fire Department.
The applicant has modified the upper bench ol the development and has eliminabd all
parking within the required 20Joot front setback area. One of the three proposed curb
cub off of Lionsridge Loop has also been eliminated, The straff believes that all of
these changes are positive changes and result in a hi,gher quality project which will
lurther enhance its compatibility with ths immediate neighborhood.
G. A clrculation system deslgned for both vehlcles and pedestrlans
addresshg on and oft€lte trafilc clrcula$on,
Site PlanA/ehicular Access (CDOT access oermit).
Access to the lower bench of this site, to the four "townhouse-type' units, is proposed
via a curb cut oft of th6 North Frontage Road. Acess to the unib on the northem or
upper bench of this site is designed as a series ot two curb cuF off ol Lionsridge Loop
Road. A Colorado Department of Transportation access permit will be required belore
a buiHing permit can be released for the four units that take access off the North
Frontage Road.
Future Sirnba Underoass.
As discussed in the recently adopted Vail Transportation Master Plan, the oonstruction '
of an l-70 underpass in the vicinity of Simba Flun, is proposed as a first prlority
recommendation for both the West Vail interchange and the Main Vail interchange
improvements. The underpass would be constructed immediately opposite the
proposed curb cut lor the lower bench development. To accommodats the underpass,
it would be necessary lo lower the North Frontage Road approximalely 13 to 15 feet in
this arga. The applicant has submitted a regrading plan which indicates he regrading
which would be necessary to accommodate the future l-70 underpass. lt appears that
the applicant's proposed design would not be in conflict with the tuture underpass, and
the Town Engineer has approved the aceess and regrading plans.
Pedestrian Access.
The staff has requested hat the applicant pursue the possibility of locating a public
pedestrian path through the property so tlat pedestrian access can be maintaind from
the Lionsridge Loop area down to the North Frontage Road. We believe that this
pedestrian access would become even more critical should the proposed Simba
underpass be constructed. The applicant has agreed that such a public easement
through the property would make good flanning sense, however, the applicant is
concemed about the potential liability and maintenance iesues sunounding a public
pedestrian path. The applicant has agreed to eonsider adding a pedestrian connection
through the property shoukt he Town Attorney be able to provide them with a level ol
comlort regarding the liability conoerns.
H. Functlonal and aesthetlc landscaplng and open space In order lo optlmlze
and presele natural teatures, rtereatlon, vlews and funetlons.
At the suggestion of the Planning and Environmental Commission, the applicant has
modified the proposed landscaping plan to include larger evergreen trees (12 - 15 feet
in height) at the base of the upper development area. Additional screening has been
provided throughout the site, and the project as a whole does meet the required 60%
minimum landscaped area. The existing recreation/bike path has been realQned so
that it crosses the lower development area approximately 40 teet north of the
driveway's intersection with the North Frontage Road. This was done at the request of
the PEC. Additionally, the bike path meanders slightly to fie south of the townhomes.
Overall, stiaff believes that the landscaping plan provides ad€guate soaening and
green space.
l. Phaslng plan or subdlvlslon plan that wlll malntaln a workable, funcllonal
and efflclent relatlonshlp throughout the development of the speclal
development dlstrict.
Since the initial PEC work session, the applicant has modified the project's phasing
plan. Phase I would now consist of the two condominium buildings located on the
northwest comer of the site. This would consist of a total ol eight dwelling units.
Phase ll would include he remaining two buildings in the upper d€velopment area and
the employee building. The final phase of the project would consist of the four
to$rnhomes located on the lower bench ol the proper$. The staff believes that the
applicant's modilications to the phasing plan are now acceptable.
v. STAFF RECgMMENDATIgN
The staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a major modification to
Special Development District No. 5. We believe that the modifications which have been madg
to th€ project, since the initial PEC work session, have brought the project into comfliance
with the nine Special Development District review criteria listed in this memorandum.
With regard to the development standards as indicated in the Zoning Analysis section of this
memorandum, the staff does acknowledg€ that the projecl is over on site coverage and is
slightly under on the required enclosed parking percentage. With regard to site ctverage, the
Phase t development on this site (the existing Simba Run buildings) has already exceeded fie
20o/o fias<imurn site coverage. We think that the total site coverage proposed, 31%, is
reasonable given the high density residential nature of this project. As a point ol comparison,
should this property have been zoned High Density Multi-Family, the maximum allowable site
coverage, according to cunent Town of Vailzoning, would be 55%. The $taff finds that the
proposed 31% site @verage and the overall she plan design is reasonable.
Although the applicant has not met the required 85"6 enclosed parkjng persnlage for the
entire Development Area B, the staff does lind that the applicant has designed th€ proieet $rith
I
I
a
all of the surtace parking located on the nodh side of the buildings, and that the proposed
82!/o enclosed parking is reasonable. Again, we would point out that if the property had bgen
zoned High Density Mulli-Family, the requked enclosed parking percontage wouH be 75%.
In summary, the staff is recommending approval with the understanding that the applicant
agrees with the following conditions, and we believe the project subslantially complies wih the
nine SDD revielv criteria as indicated in this memorandum, The conditions are as follo,rrts:
l. The applicant shall provide one additional parking space on the western end of
the upper development area.
2. The Town shall not issue a Ternporary Certificate of Occupancy for any of the
Phase ll condominiums until such time as TCO's have been issued for all four
units in the empoyee housing building.
3, The applicant agrees that if the liability issues conceming the construction and
maintenance of a public pedestrian path/easement hrough the property can be
resolved with the Town Atlomey, the applicant shall oonstruct a pedestrian pattr
and grant a public access easement t0 th6 Town of Vail.
4. A Colorado Department of Transportation access permit shall be grantad prior
to the issuance of any building or grading permlts lor the lower bench of the
development four townhomes).
c:F€c\m€mos\sifi ba"524
\'\8\ffi
z
5
*
Htt,
fuir
\\
i\
Irr
I
t
1l
r\
Xi
{
\)
1 $\
s
@
t
.!
@{
Fr
I'
if
l\
t
II
t.'t!
l!
I
,nI1lsIJ
d
0
. .{.
It
TI
i
0-
$
-l
ul"$
n
d.
|l
.rl.f
s
I
I
II
:f \
Y;
' J.
\
I
i1
I
I
?hnsc ltr ?hnre lE
'-oe7 '7."*.,r,
?teOL
-d
o \ f,\gE-"s*
8fl,.-,-,,
t rra t{.FAa,L
Pl'esc W
SITE FLAI'I
b
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0183 INGERSOLL IANE
srLT, coLoRADO 81652
. @3) 87664m F{ HOUFST
Apri! lSo 1995
SinlLy Frainerd
l.lcrrt-l+r Arr:hi tects
1rl3 Eaet Fleador.r 1)ri';e
Er-Dssroads at- VailV*il, Cu 81657
REr 5avo1, \ti I I as
tDenr 9i;1 I y;
I have re*r,iewed the *ite of the re.fer-enced pr*ject. as shorln onthe ecccrnpanyi.nF rnap -[or Furpflces o{ $nck: FslI reviertr .[or the]nt.lrrr:r.l.\,i*jl"ThennrthernfcrurLlni.tffiiEh
Rfli:l':{;rl L Zgnsl cl,.re tc the outcru:ppinS s4 sandstone $n the othErgidnr of the t-icjn's RitJge Lopp. l-he seccrnd tier of unj.ts is nc,tin l::he hn:srrd:one,
Tlris j.s in a ltoc.rti.sn wlrerp the ri clq1e, corit*irrinr.t {:h.; snr.trrei eri:
FCrtiir,tifii .f alIitrg r*nalc:r, ir at a inr.,r iuvel rn:ith rns;rrirrt ta tht:
::;:1. tr,:ri i:[rl". r"rr:!t$ i.:an i- e,::i.c ]r tht. ncir-tftern,..;:iteg. -l i're y-ncl::g-., r.r i. llhlvr: ',,: i rrn:i i i.;:.'rrrt: t:.n*,r !ly r;cl that fiigL;ati.6n r^ti J. i brr neces$rrV,
ll.rrr.,' t:.n:;l:,?h:i r..r t" [)l: 1.,:9i osfit.tr .ahn\,F thir prnpnged deVelopnr*rrt, but
ti"r*: 1..r1:r:ti rtt.eCl. lot i i..l Catcif s6rne n.f th6-,m. The? h*ae&rd i nCr-egeeS tO
irhgr r'J!i:i:l L"rf irrjjre t.he ridEe hr*corne$ highero tfrerefry irnpartirrg ffir:re.
l:"i.nerti{: Fnergy to potontial. .falling rock*,
.[ pr,:rpr.rse several alternatives ttt sutbrgtan.b j. a3. Iy 6ir'tini:n thehararcl 'trorn {aI.lin+l . F{.}c[::s... A .f ourr {oot- hi..:h berm -nrav-.he
fl fltt gi t r" r-r.: t r:d .r ll nntl 'tfre south j..hr*s,,
rr-rrTi rr1"-.r f not fle at l or,,,ed bec$use it rnay i nter-{ere Hitlr the ?oaclriqht r:{ r+,:y" Anoth*r stop which cfrn be taken ib to,r,Je,sien ttre
{5g1i!*jlqrth l:idel o.f each of thege four units ts a Etre;
it-|".. MEr!;er FGuare 'f Do at leagt {our '{eet abcav$
n i sihed qr.aC|a!
*-
e no r{ln I
ltirlrl tr: protr:ct tlre hrr-:ittl e concrete.... If .prigriibre. bot"fr n.f ttrerc,-lreeiigns *houlrJ be uti. li.aed, esFeciatfy
fe+t hlEh with the s;f,rne strenqth qiven atxove, Thi.j wall could
I\.i :'r-J lre o'f bJFl l placerl 1a,r-ger (i {oot } borrlders. Eerause ci-f th'&nature nf the haa"rrd and thei cptions $or nrit_iqation, I qurggegtthat f i nirl plans be revipyred hy. yor-rr enqintrcr and mr* (o7-TEEF
qnsre{:|.lT,} cal |3:{per.E ) once the prctl;,:!rred methodr, havF been chogen.
constrr-rctinn . o{ f-her,e
prr:1i m j. frary crrnreptlral i:ations.
g'or an\,
Si nce,gel y,' -rkl^/h -"4d
Itti chnl as lanpi ril s
Consulti.r"rq ll$?$l oqi rt
the osed mitiqatinn
I
| | t--
.t .t
{1
t4,f
LJ
r-1(1r lncreasc! the h$?ard to. nther nr t st4ritures
s-'of -'r,l.ry, bui l di nge, ro.edsl Stre e.tgFmgntg,es $r- f ficFe qr-re*tions pleasie contact mL-, es,pe;m uri rrg your-
Hoy eB '9ts 5153 il**;';';.,;,t. !
Nlcholau LamPiris, Ph.D.
EI{I'ULl ll{u I'EOLg$l$r
0185 ll{(ilHsL'tt LAt{E
slLT. ooLonApo 0105?
,gmr,u*rE'*otrot
Hey 16r t??3
Erlly 8r.tnGrc,tlortrr Archrtlstr
l4S Eut ilrrd€il llrlv;Crorrreldr rt vrlIVallr CO €rgF7
REt Srvoy Villu
Dilr ErIlyl
I hrvt rlviaxld thr rttr pl,rn yehtcn ytrll hrvr rccrntly trntt tl
pri--o". Uticurstsntr {6r rnitfgrtron bf tnr rock frtl hrtrrd rt
ftrr rf te. Ytru hrvt'addr:rpcl my Eangpnl vt;-y well. but thrrl *rc
rtf lt a couple of chrnger 6r rctctttloni t*hlch shtrulil br
t ncorporttrd.
tdlth thr hlrnr in Flaer tf you hrvt elrfintd thdnl vary frw rpckr
trrn rtlgh th* Wstern {our irnitt, ..'dr blcrUla th. frerrtr of
thost unttr rrl ln the {orrn af gertg:rr I lltl not conErrntr, th.t
danrer cln oetrur to ltvlng qUrp}c4. Thl trrttrnnsrt unltr
hon:vff. r'lhtrt rgtrk {rll ti*aerdl rrt lclr llv}rt1 hrr r lEftri
brrn rnd to ger:qi te protrct ltvtng qurttrr. Th'rr{Drpt I
rre66n;nd a itrrer foot'ht€h strn lr{l-l on thr nerth eJrll }rhlEh
rhould hrv: I rtrrnqth uf 4tl0 poundr par aqutrr f,oot rnd Hsecl
dnorl rr rtrong ar {rariblr in thrt r*rll.
Al*o, thcrc ir a brenk tn th: brrm tn front of thc n;xt qntt' to
thn nilt for drlvrwry tctrtlr. rhr rxpoild portlon D+ thr untt
whleh lr n6t Errtgr lhoqld br thr rrnr rtrfngth r+ll te thru
{nt' l't thrrr rr: rtill qu:rttonr contret nt'
ffi";10;'Nicholu Lrm'Ptrl r
Csnrult{ng €roloqtrt
1t.t
FILE COPV
A request for a maior amerdment b SDD #5 to allow for the developmont of the
remaining portlon of tre tHba Fun $DD, Sawy Ylllas, located at 1100 Norh Frontage
Rod, more specifically desctibed as follows:
That p8il of S|s Flrsfi Srrpplemertal lhp for Slmba Run Condominium, eocoGfing to the map fter€fiil
r€cord€d ln tho otffce cf fie Eaole County, Cobredo, Cl.rk and Bccoder, deecdbed es bllwy3:
8€glndng at the most souilhtffite.ly corner d said m.p, thorEe the following three courss alo.rg the
resilorly Ines of sald map; l) No3.3t!'01'E 160.79 fe€t; 2) N1f50ts3'E trl4.?2 fed;9) N17o56G'70.60
teet; thonce, depadng 3sld tveEilorly Sn€, S13o18'03'W 1t.28 tc€|, thencs S76'4il'5trE 91,50 feet; thence
N13o16'03'E 35.(A t€eu thsn6 S76"4tt'5i7 E 72..31 feet to th€ .aFtedy Ine of said mrp; ttrcnce the iolbrirB
two couns€s alorE fi. easterly and southeasledy Ines ol saH map; l) S24o44'5/'E 52.38 f€€t;2)
SSP50?9'W 272.50 l€€t to the Polrt of Beglnrilng, codalnltq 0.6134 .cr€st nror€ or hss; and
Thd part ol Slnta Run. eccordrq !o $e m€p thersl, recoded ln Book E12 st Page 763 In the O{fioe ol
the Eagle Ccuflly, Cobrsdo, Cl€tt erd Recoder, dcc|lb€d as tdkrrs:
B€ginrdrE at tho rmsn southerly comer of sald Eiimba Run, thenca tfie b[or{ng four ctrJts€s alorg lhe
sol.nttwcsierly and northweeterty tn€s cf sald Sin$a Bun; 1) Mf0931lr 233.28lee$ 2) 33tf.St lcet alotg
the arc d a cuile to tlr€ left, havlng a radius of tlal.gs te€t, e central argle ol 10e49'06', ard a cfiod lhel
bears i,&1231 3 20'E 334.07 feet; 3) il3648'48 E 2ol .36 lost; 4) I 5.9€ t.3t elong the arc ol . ar e !o the
rigtrt, havlng a radiue ct 428.02ie€t, a central angle cf 0?08'12', and a chod that b.ats N37'52'ta' E
15.96 fe€t io a corner on the wterty bqjndary ol ths Fir$ Srrpplem€rnal Map lor Siinba Run
Qondomidum, accorclng to the map ther€ot recod€d in the cflice ol the Eagle Courdy, Cobudo, Gh* and
Rmnler; rhance th€ lofio*lre lour mr.nse ahrE saH wGtedy bouilhry; 1] S21"51'281t 59.90 l€ot;2)
s17056'03w 181.17 t d; 3) S12.5033"V1/ 141.72trd;4' S03"33'01'W 160.70 te€r !o th€ southeasrerly line
of said Simba Fun; thence, along saH soulhsastefly lins, S5F50'29W 113.m fe3t to the Point ol
B€giln.ilrE, contalning 1.560 acres, rflore or l€ss,
Simba Land CorporationAllalid Said
Mike Mollica TABLED TO JUNE 28, 19S(Applicant:
Plannsr:
Appllcant:
Planner:
Town of Vail
Andy Knudtsen
12.
Jefl Bowen made a request to table this ltem untilJuno 28, 1993 with Greg Amsden
secondlng this request. A unanimous 7-0 vote tabled this roquest untll June 28, 1993.
A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivislon to allow for the development ot
single family homes located on Tracils A and B, The Valley, Phase ll/1480 Bufler Creek
Rd.
Applicant:
Planner:
Steve Gensler/Parkwood Realty
Andy Knudben TABLED TO JUNE 28, 19S
Jeff Bowen made a request to table ulis ltem untilJuns 28, 199.3 wlth @eg Amsden
sscondlng this request. A unanimous 7-O vote tabled this rsquest until Jun6 28, 1993.
A request to revlew the Management Plan and Master Plan for the Vail Csmebry to be
located In the upper bench ol Donovan Park generally locabd $test of the Glen Lyon
subdivision and southeast of th€ Matterhom nebhborhood.
13.
TABLED TO JUNE 28,19gl
Plsnnlng and Eruircnmental CommisSon
Irne L, $e0 12
a.( **
Exoho, Ltd. Eric Beringause S & J Operating Co.
c/o 1st American Federal Savings 1487 Shoreline Drive P.O. Box 2249
P.O. Box 878 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wichita Falls, fi 76307
Fort Smith, AZ 72902
Stuart Brown
P.O. Box 2359
Vail, CO 81658
John Markel
102nd Dodge Street
Omaha, NE 68114
Barry Watts
3516 Elm Creek Court
Fort Worth, TX 76109
Joan Agree Comegys-Abemathy Co. Telemark Townhouses
813 Mira Drive P.O. Box 757 1090 Vail View Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80906 Archer City, TX 76351 Vail, CO 81657
Vail Run Condo Assoc.
100 Lions Ridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
(o /q lq3 - oclacLrr$ Sl"-rf o-{_r €l \
t\
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and EnvironmentalCommission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on June 28, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for the establishment of a Special Development District to allow the
expansion of the Vail Athletic Club, located at 352 East Meadow Drive, and more
specifically described as follows:
A parcsl of land In Tract B, Vail Village, First Filing, Tor,vn of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing et the Nonhoast corner of said Tract i]; thence N 79'46'00'W along the Northerly line of Vail
Village, First Filing, and along the Northerly line of said Tract B 622.86 feet; thence S 0596'5U W a
distance of 348.83 t€et 10 the Southwest corner of lhat parcel of land descrlbed in Book 191 at Pag€ 139 as
recorded January 10, 1366 and filed in B€ceplion No. 102978 in the Eagle County Records, said corn€r also
being the True Point ol Beginning; thence S 79"04'08" E and along th6 Southerly line of said parcel 200.00
feet to the Southeast comer thereof; th€nce N 62"52'00" E and along lhe Northsrly line of that parcel of land
described in Book 222 at Page 513 as recorded in 1971 in the Eagle Counly R€cords, a distancs of 66.78
feet lo th€ Northeastgrly @rner ot said parcel of land; said corner being on the Westerly right{f-way line ol
Gore Creek Road, as planed in Vail Village, Fifth Filing; thence N 27't337" W a distance ol77.37 teet
along said Weslerly right-of-way line of Gore Creek Road; thence N 89"2922" W a distance ol 12.80 feet to
thg Northeasterly c€rner of that parcel of land described in Book 191, Page 139 as recorded January 10,
1966 and iiled in Reception No. 102978 in the Eagle Counly Records; thenc€ Northwestsrly 2€.51 le6t along
the arc ol a 37.50 l6et radlus curve lo the lett having a central angle of 40'30'00'whose chord bears N
53"40'@'W a distarrce ol 25.96 fe€t to a point ol tangency; thence N 73'55'00" W and along said tangent
166,44 fe€t; thence N 85'1021' W a distanc€ of 50.40 {set to ths Nonhw€sterly corner of ths lt ountaifi
Haus Parcel; thence S 02"18'00' W and along lhe easterly line of said lilounlain Haus Parcel a distance of
100,00 teet lo th€ Southeasterly corner thersof; thence S 45"13'53" E a distance of 38.70 feel to ths Tru€
Point of Beglnning, containing 30,486 square feet, more or l€ss.
2.
3.
A request for a height variance, a density variance, a landscape variance and a major
exterior alteration of the Uostello Condominium Building located at 705 West
Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Uonshead 4th Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planners:
vail Athletic club
Shelly Mello
L'Ostello Gondominiums
Shelly Mello
Town of Vail
Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
A request for a worksesslon for proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District, and Ghapter 18.32 Agricultural and Open
Space District, of the Vail MunicipalCode.
"a
.4.
5.
7.
A request for an EHU-lll to be located within the
Hanson Flanch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village
former Whitehead residence, 366
First Filing.
A request for the establishment of an SDD to allow the expansion of the Anderson
residence located at Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lion's Ridge 4th Filing/1775 Sandstone
Drive.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
John Shirley
Andy Knudtsen
Todger Anderson
Andy Knudtsen
Oscar Tang
Andy Knudtsen
A request for an exterior alteration for Lionshead Center to allow an addition on the
southwest corner of Lionshead Genter, located at Lot 5, Block 1, Lionshead 1st
Filing/520 Lionshead Circle.
*
A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion ol the Simba Run SDD, $avoy Villas, located at 1100 North Frontage
Boad, more specitically described as follows:
That parl of the First Suppl€mental Map for Simba Run Condominium, accoding 10 the map ihersol
recorded in the otfice of th6 Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Rscorder, described as follows:
Beglnning at lhs mosl souhwesterly corner of said map, thsnce the tollowing thre€ iourses along the
wgsterly lines of said map; 1) N03o33'01"E 160.79 teeu 2) N12"50'33"E 144.72 {eeu 3} N17"56'03" 70.60
fset; th€nce, depaning said w€sterly line, S13ol6'03"W 157,26 feet, thsnc€ S76043'57"€ 91,50 fsEt; therEe
N13"16'03'E 35.00 teet; thencs 376"43'57"8 72.31 feet to the easterly lina of said map; lhence the follo$ring
two courses along tho sasterly and southeasterly lines of said map; 1) S24.44'57"E 52.38 feet; 2)
S52'5029'W 272.50 leetlo ths Point of Beginning, containing 0.5134 acres, more or less; and
That pan of Simba Run, according to the map thereof, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in the Ofiice of
the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follols:
Beginning at lhe mosl southerly corner of said Simba Flun, thence th€ follorving four cours€s along the
soulhweslerly and northwesterly lines of said Simba Run; 1) N37"09'31"W 233.28 fset; 2) 334.57 leet along
the arc of a curve to the lett, having a radius of 1771 .95 leet, a central angle ol 10'49'06", and a chord that
bears N42'13'20"E 334.07 feet; 3) N36"48'48" E 201.36 teel; 4) 15.96 feet along th€ arc ot a curve to the
dghl, having a radius ot 428.02 teet, a central angle of 02'08'12', and a chord thal bears N37"52'54" E
't5.96 feet to a corn€r on tho w€sterly boundary ot th6 First Supplemental Map for Simba Run
Condominium, acctrding lo th6 map thereol recorded in the office of th€ Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and
Recorder; th€nce the following tour courses along said westerly boundary; 1) S21"5128'W 63-90 fest; 2)
S17"56'O3'W 181.17 toet; 3) 512'50'33"W 144.72teet;4) 503"33'01"W 160.79 feet lo ths southeasterly line
of said Simba Run; thence, along said southeasterly line, S52.5029'W t 13.08 feet to the Point ol
Beginning, containing 1.560 acres, more or less.
Applicant:$imba Land CorporationMalid Said
o
Planner: Mike Mollica
8. A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for the development of
single family homes located on Tracts A and B, The Valley,'Phase lll1480 Buffer Creek
Rd.
Applicant: Steve Gensler/Parkwood RealtyPlanner: Andy Knudtse
9. A request to review the Management Plan and Master Plan for the Vail Cemetery to be
located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located west of the Glen Lyon
subdivision and southeast of the Matterhorn neighborhood.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
10. A request for the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Comice
Building and a request lor a conditional use permit to allow the construclion of three
Type lV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically
described as follows:
A pan ol Tract "8" and a part ol Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, Firsl Filing, County ot Eagle, Stal€ of
Colorado, more particularly describ€d as lollows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Vail Village, Firsl Filing; thence North 79"46'00" Wes along the
soulherly line ol U.S. Highv/ay No. 6 a distancE ot 367.06 teet to lhe Northsast cornar of said Tract "8";
thence South 10"14'00'West along the Easterly line of said Tract "B'; a distance ol 198.31 feel to the
Southeaslerly corner of said Tract "g'; thence Nodh 79'46'00" West along the Soulherly lins of said Tract
'8" a distanc€ of 100.00 fset to the tru€ point ot beginning thence North 09"10'07" West a distanco ot 41.67
tesl; lhenca South 88'27'11- West a distance of 75.21 feet; thenco South 27"13'37" East a dislanca of
77,37 leel; th€nce North 57o24'00" East a distance of 55.1 1 feet, more or less to lho tru€ point of beginning.
Applicant: David SmithPlanner: Jim Curnutte
1 1. Discussion of restrictions pertaining to development in areas having 40% or grealer
slope.
Planner: Mike Mollica
5.
Diana Donovan stated that the PEC's main concern with this request was that the
conversion to a professional otfice could result in a "loss of life and excitement on
Bridge Street".
Greg Amsden made a motion to deny the request for a conditional use permit per the
staff's memo and also because this request could open up fuiure problems at this site,
by allowing more GRFA to be added above the professional office (new third floo{.
Bill Anderson seconded this motion. Kristan Pritz added, for clarification, that future
scenarios would have to be considered separately in respect to GRFA additions. Greg
Amsden withdrew his previous statement and a 4-1-1 vote denied this request with
Allison Lassoe abstaining due to her winter employment with Vail Associates and Jeif
Bowen opposing this vote.
Jeff Bowen stated that it was his opinion that reducing the bed base on Bridge Street
had merit because of the noise in this area.
A request for a major amendment lo SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows:
That part of lhe Firsl Supplemental Map for Siimba Run Condominium, according lo lhe map thoreof
recorded in the otlice ol tho Eagl€ County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning at the most soulhwoslerly corner of said map, lhence the following three coursss along tho
weslerly lines of said map; 1) NO3"33'01'E 160.79 f€€t; 2) N12"50'33"E 144.72 teet; 3) N17"56'03" 70.60
foet; thence, departing said westerly line, S13"16'03"W 157.26 feet, thence S76ozl!l'57'E 91.50 fset; lhence
N13"16'03"E 35.00 feet; thence S76"43'57"E72.31 f€st to the easterly lins of said map; thence th€ follol,ving
two coursos along the €ast€rly and southeasterly lines of said map; 1) S24"44'57'E 52.38 feet; 2)
S52"50'29'W 272.50 feet to the Point of Beginning, mntaining 0.6134 acres, mor€ or less; and
That part of Simba Run, according to the map th€reof, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in the office of
the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
B€ginning at the rnost southsrly corner of said Simba Run, thenc€ ths follo,\ ring four courses along the
sorlhweslerly and norlhwestsrly lines ol said Simba Run; l) N37"09'31"W 233.28 teeu 2) 334.57 tset along
lhe arc of a curve to th€ lstt, having a radius of 1771.95 feet, a c€ntral angl€ of 10049'06', and a chord that
b€ars N42o13'20'E 334.07 feet; 3) N36o48'48' E 201.36 t€el; 4) 15.96 teet along the arc of a curvo to tho
righl, having a radius ol 428.02 feet, a central angls ot 0f08'12", and a chord that bears N37o52'54" E
15.96 feet to a corner cn ths weslerly boundary ol lhe First Supplemental Map tor Simba Run
Condominium, according to th€ map lhereol recorded in tho olfice of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and
Recorder; th€nc€ tho lollowing lour courses along said weslerly boundary; 1) S21"51'28"W 69.90 feet; 2)
S17"56'03"W 181.17 {6el; 3) S12"50'33"W 144,72faal;4) S03"3:l'01"W 160.79 feet lo th€ southeasterly line
ol said Simba Run; thence, along sald southeasterty line, S52'50'29"W 'l13.08 te€t to lhe Point of
Beginning, containing 1.560 acres, more or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land CorporationM/alid Said
Mike Mollica
Kathy Langenwalter made a motion to table this item until June 14, 1993 with Jeff
Bowen seconding this motion. A 6-0 vote tabled this item until June 14, 1993.
Plannlng and Envlronmental Commbsion
llay 24, 1993 3
OO
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUF FFOPERTV
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEFEBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section '18.66.060 of the MunicipalCode of
the Town of Vail on June 14, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A determination for lhe review periods of the Exterior Alteration requests in the CCI
and CClt zone districts:
60 day review period L'Ostello Shelly Mello
60 day review period Lionshead Center Andy Knudtsen
90 day review period Enzian Shelly Mello
90 ciay review period Liflhouse Lodge Jim Curnutte
(Pizza Bakery)
90 day review period Sunbird Lodge Tim Devlin
90 day review period Gondola Building Andy Knudlsen
90 day review period Cyrano's Mike Mollica
2. A request for a major CCll exterior alteration, a setback variance and a site coverage
variance to allow ior the construction of an elevator tower located at the Enzian at Vail
Condominiums, 705 West Lionshead Circle/part of Enzian Gondominium Association,
Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing.
Applicant: Enzian Condominium AssociationPlanner: Shelly Mello
3. A request for an exlerior alteration for Lionshead Cenler to allow an addition on the
southwest corner of Lionshead Cenler, located at Lot 5, Block 1, Lionshead lst
Filing/S20 Lionshead Circle.
Applicant: Oscar TangPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
4. A request for a modificat;on to PEC conditions of approval for the revised development
plan torVailPoinvlSSl Lionsridge Loop/Lot 1, Block3, Lionsridge Filing No.3.
Applicant: Steve GensleriParkwood RealtyPlannen Andy Knudtsen
5. A request to review the Management Plan and Master Plan for the Vail Cemetery to be
located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally tocated west of the Glen Lyon
subdivision and southeast ol ihe Malterhorn neighborhood.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
ro
i
A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for ths dewlopment of
single lamily homes located on Tracts A and B, The Valley, Phase ll/1480 Buffer Creek
Hd.
A request for the establishment of an SDD to allow the redevelopment of the Cornice
Building and a request for a condiiional use permit to allow the construction of three
Type lV employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically
described as follows:
A part ot Tract "B" and a parl ot Mill Creek Road, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, State of
Colorado, more paniculady described as follows:
Commencing al the Norlheasl corner ol Vail Village, First Filing; thence North 75"46'00'West along th€
Southerly line of U.$. Highway No. 6 a distance of 367.06 {eet to the No(heasi corner ol said Tract "B";
thence Soulh 10o14'00" west along the Easl€rly line o{ said Tract "B"; a distance of 198.31 teet lo ths
Southea$erly corner ol said Tract "8"; rhence Norlh 79'46'00" West along lhe Southerly line of gaid Tract
"8" a distance oi 100.00 teet to rhe true point ot beginning lhence Nonh 09010'07" West a dislancg of 41,67
teet; thence South 88'27'11" Wesl a distance ol 75.21 feet; lhence Soulh 27"13'37" East a distance of
77.37 leet; lhence No(h 57'24'OO" Easr a dislance of 55.11 feet, more or l€sg lo the lrue polnt ol beginning.
o.
-?
8.A request for a setback variance to allow for the
the north half of Lot 5, Matterhorn Village, 171 1
Sleve Gensler/Parkwood Realty
Andy Knudtsen
David Smith
Jim Curnutte
Carl Fauland
Tim Devlin
conslruction of a residence located on
A Geneva Drive.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:+'A request for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1.|00 North Frontage
Fload, more specilically described as follows:
That pan of the First Supplemental Map for Simba Run Condominium, according to the map thereof
fecorded in lhs oltice ol the Eagle Counly, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as lollows:
Beginning at lhe mosl soulhtvesterly corner of said map, thence the following three courses along the
westerly fines of said map; 1) NO3"33'01"E 160.79 leer;2) N12"50'33"E 144.72leet;3) Nl7'56'03" 70.60
feel; ihencg, departing said rvesterly line, S13016'03"W 157.26leer,lhence 576043'57"8 91.50 teel; lhsnc€
N13"16'03"E 35.00 {eel; thence 576"43'57"E 72.31 teet ro the easlerly line of said map; thencs lhe following
t\tro courses along the easterly and soulheasterly lines of Said map; 1) S24"44'57"E 52.3S teet;2)
S52'50?9"W 272.50 teet lo the Point ol Beginning, conraining 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
That parl ol Simba Run, according to lhe rnap lhereof, recorded in Book 312 at Pags 763 in th€ Office of
lhe Eagle Coudy, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning ai the mosl sotrtherly corner ol said Simba Run, thence tha tollowing four courses alorq the
souhwesterly and nonhwesterly lines of saiC Sirnba Run: 1) N37"09'31"W 233.28 t€et;2) 334.57 feel along
the arc of a curve to the lert, having a radius of 1771.95 feet, a cenlral angle of 10"49'06", and a chord thal
bears N42'13'20"8 334.07 {eel; 3) N36'o48'49" E 2o1.36 teet; 4) 15.96 teel along th€ arc ot a curvs to lhe
righr, having a radius ol 428.02 feet, a cenlral angle of 0208'12', and a chord that bears N37"52'54' E
15.96 leet to a corner on the westerly boundary ot rhe Firsl Suppleme al Map for Simba Run
Condominium, according to the map thereof recorded ln the office ol the Eagls County, Colorado, Clerk and. Recorder; lhence the {ollowing four courses along said westerly boundary; 1) 521"5128"W 69.90 feet; 2)' S17"56'03"W 181.17 feer; 3) S12'50'33"W 144.72 feei; 4) 503"33'01"W 160.79 feet 10 the soulheasterly line
of said Simba Run; thence, along said sourheaslerly line, S52'50'29"W 113.08 l€et lo the Point of
Beginning, containing 1.560 acres, more or less.
Applicant: Simba Land CorporationMalid SaidPlanner: Mike Mollica
10. A request to amend Section 18.58.020 of the Zoning Code to clarify the height allowed
for retaining walls in setbacks.
Applicant: Town ol VailPlanner: Tim Devlin
11. Update on Sweet Basil's deck construction located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/part of
Block 58, Vail Village lst Filing.
Applicant: Ned GwathmeyPlanner: Shelly Mello
12. Update on the Smail/Connely variance located at Lot 5, Bighorn Estates/4238 Nugget
Lane.
Applicant: Michael and Sally ConnelyPlanner: Shelly Mello
13.
.
Discussion with Greg Hall regarding traftic studies lor Vail Road.
14. Appoint PEC Chairperson.
O
Exoho, Ltd.
c/o 1st American Federal Savings
P.O. Box 878
Fon Smith, AZ 72902
Stuart Brown
P.O. Box 2359
Vail, CO 81658
Joan Agree
813 Mira Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
Vail Run Condo Assoc.
100 Lions Hidge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
Eric Beringause
1487 Shoreline Drive
Wayzala, MN 55391
John Markel
102nd Dodge Street
Omaha, NE 68114
Comegys-Abernathy Co.
P.O. Box 757
Archer City, TX 76351
:S&JOperatingCo.
P.O. Box 2249
Wichita Falls, TX 76307
rBarry Watts
13516 Elm Creek Court
Fort Worth, TX 76109
Telemark Townhouses
1090 Vail View Drive
Vail, CO 81657
5laco/aa- CIqclco-rts &-rL aLt) 9{
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
$URIECT:
MEMORANDUM
Phnnlng and Environmental Commission
Community Developnrent f/{" ri $mn v
May24, 1993
A request for a maior amendment to SDD #5 to allonr for the devetopment of
the remaining porlion of fie Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at 1100
Nofih Frontage Road and described as fotlows:
That pan oi th€ Fi|st Suppl€memat Map tor Slrba Run Condorninlum, sccordcg to tho m4
thereof recoded ln rhe otfice of the Eagh Courily. Cdowb, Ghft er|d Recorder, &Ecrfbed ag
Beglnning at lhs rnost southu/estorly comsr ot sakl nap. rh€nce the iolldfling thr€o a.|,|s6 abng
ths wssterly ftnes ol said map; 1) NO0"33'01'E 160.79 t6et;2) N1f5O33"E t44.72 te€t;3)
N17o56'G'70.€0 lset; thence. departing aaid westerly llne, S13.16'091tt l''-6leet, thsnce
S76'4{l'57'E 91 .5O tedl thence N13"16'03'E 95,00 tesl; thonce S76'49'5if'E 72.31 fed to rhc
saslE ly llne ot said map; thenca rh€ following tno cours*r aloog the €asc€rly and $uh€a$€dy
fines ol said map; l) Sa4o44'#E 5e38 |eec 4 S52'50?g'W nz,$At€gt to th€ Poirt cf
Beginnirq. cofllainirq 0.6134 acres, rnore or less; and
That parl ol Simba Run, according to th€ map ther€of, recodgd in Book 3le at Page 763 in the
Odic€ ot the Eagle County, Cobrads, GlErk and Feeorder, descdbed ae follorw:
8€ginnir€ at ths rnost sor.rth€rly cornEr of said Simba Rr6, $enca tho iollontltg low courscs along
the scxj|hwssterly and noilhwast€rly lin€s of ssld SimbE Fun; 1) N37o0931nt, 239,28 f€€t; 2)
394.57 teel along tha arc ol a cunre to th6 Hr. having a radus ol 17t1,95 tost, a csntral angl6 ol
10p49'06", and a chord rhar b€ars N4r1320"E 334.07 foot; 3) N36"48'4f E 201.36 fesri 4) 15.96
t€ot along lhs arc cf a cuNe to the rlght, haying a radius of 428.02 lept, a e,sntral angile of
0P08'12', and a chord that bears N37'52'54' E 15.96 feel lo 8 corner on th6 wasteily bou$ary ol
th6 First Supplefir€nlal Map for Simba Run Condominium, according 1o the map theroof @rd€d ln
tha offce of thg Eagl€ Courny, Cobredo, Gleil< and Reeordeq thencu lh€ lollotrvlng four courses
abng said vrest€rly bourdary; 1) S21os't'28"W 69.90leet; 2) S1?"56'03"W 181.17 teot; 3)
812"50ts3v 144.72lseti 4) S00.33'01nV 160.79 feet ro the soulhaa$ody lins of said Slmba Run;
thenc€, alorE said sodhaasterly line, S52950'29'W 113.08 lset b lhe Pdnt cf Beginning,
coilaining 1.560 acres, more or lsss.
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land GorporationAAfalid Said
Mike Mollica
r. PROJECT TNTRODUCTTON
The property owner and applicant, Simba Land Corporation, is requesting a major SDD
amendmenl for the remaining phase of Special Development Distrlct #5 (Simba RuuVail Run).
The property is located at 1100 Norh Frontage Road and is bounded by lhe Timber Ridge
Apartmants to the west, the North Frontage Road and Interstate 70 to the south, Phase I of
Simba Run to the east and Uonsridge Loop Hoad to the north.
Odinance #5, Series of 1976, originatly established SDD #5 and set the parameteElorgte
development ot the Vail Run Building. Ordinance #29. Series of 1977, amended SDD #5.
This amendment expanded the SDD with ttre addition of 6.3 acres immedlately to the west of
Vait Run and in addition, divided the SDD into what is now known as Development 4rea A
lVait nun; and Development Area B (Simba Run). The dev€lopment standads for both areas
were speiificaly stipulated in this ordinance. SOO #5 was further moditied by the passage of
Ordinahce #33, Series of 1978, and Ordinance #24, Series of 1986'
il. DESCRIPTION OF Tl{E REgUEST
The proposed development ptan for the final phase of Development Area B, in SDD #5,
consists of twenty condominiums and four deed-restricted employee housing units. T_he
development plan calls for one tour-unit townhousE builcling tro be located on the southem
porlion of the property, with access immediately ott of the North Frontage Road. The
irorthem Oeveiopmeni ot the property would talie access from Lionsridge l-oop and would--
consist of four, iour-unit conObminium buildings and one, four-unit employee houslng building.
Two curb cuts are proposed off of Llonsridge Loop'
on the northem bench of this site, each condominium is proposed to have a one-car garage'
and on the lower, or southem part ol this site, each condominium wOuld have a two-car
garage.
This final phase of the SDD will be part of the existing Simba Run Condominium Association'
and as such, will have access to all ol the existing recreational amenities located in the
existing Simba Run project. These recreational amenities include three outdoor tgnnis cosrts,
two inJ'oor racquedcitt iourts and one indoor swimming pool. Vail Run has its own outdoor
swimming pool and two indoor tennis courts.
The SDD departs from the approved development standards in the following areas:
'site coverage
.enclosed Parking
This project site is locaied within a high severity rockfall-geologic hazard zone. The
apptiiani's consutting geologist, Nicholas lampiris, has compteted a geologic investigation-for
tdd property. The orlginal study is datect April 18, 1993, the updated study is dated May 18'
1993 and both are attached to this memorandum.
ItI. ZONING ANALYSIS
Listed below is the zoning analysis for
buildings):
located in SDD #5 (Phase I includes the two existing Simba Run
Sita Area:
So{bacP6:
Heighr
ORFA:
urib:
Enplope
Drelnng Units:
"gte Cov€ragF:
tandscaping:
*'Parking:
APPROIED DEV.@9,
6.3 acrss/274,428 sq. ll.
20' - all perimebr
proporty litp8
45',
129,m0 sq. ft. - DU's
10.000 so. tl. - EHU's
139,(D0 Bq. ft.
139
10 (min.)
31,886 3q. ft. (20%)
164,657 sq. ft (€o%)
85% endoeed
PHASE I
DEV. AREA B
4.7 ad€s804,732 6q. |t
20' - all perimobr
property lir€s
20- 60'
90,807 sq. ft.
4,601 sq. ft.
95,408 sq. ft.
95
6
65,089 sq. ft. (2,1%)
It6,302 sq. fr. (42%)
.|28 €nclos€d (95%)
5 surlace
134
-{l'
REMAINING DEV.
POTENThL AFTER
@
N/A
il/A
N/A
98, lglt sq. lt.
5.399 sa ft.
43,592 sq. ft.
14
4
<lqz0g sq. ft.>
<48,355 sq. ft.>
N/A
N/A
PHASE II
DEV. AREA 8
1.6 |cr.3/69,696 .q. ft
20' - .ll plrln.llr
propcrty llncl
t8. /B'
33P8r q.
'L2.5it6 'q.ft.38,{20 .q. lL
20
{
'18,0t9 rq. ll. (?l5l
53,329 .q. ft. (rs*)
2a r|rclo!.d {{lr)
@
51
+
TOTAL
OEV. AREA B
8.3 acrea
tt/A
N/A
l2if,69l Bq. t
7.137 sa. ll.
131,828 sq. lt
115
10
84,002 tq. ft. (31%)
160,691 3q. ft (6il%)
152 endocsd (81'96)
3(l surfaF
185
.{},
Commercial Aea: $
' Indude 1,292 seat€ bet of Timb€r Ridgp's osbm-most buildng.
" The prcpoosd pRiect dopans from fr€se approv€d dslr€lopment standads'
rv. CR|TERTA TO BE USEp rN qVALUATTNG THIS PROPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the putpose of special development districts is to:
'... encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order lo
promote ib most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality
of new development within the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical
provision ot streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of
open space areas; and to further the overall goals ol the community as stated
In the Vail Gomprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a speclal
development district, in conjunction wifi a property's underlying zone district,
shall estarblish the requirements for guidlng development and uses of property
included in the special development district.'
The lollowing are the nine special development district criteria to be utitized by the Planning
and Environmental Commission when evaluating SDD proposals:
A. Deslgn compatlblllty and sensltlvlty to the lmmedlate envlronment,
nelghborhood and adlacent prcpertles relatlve to archltectural dEslgn,
acale, bulk, bulldlng helght, bufler zones, ldentlty, charaeter, vlsual
Integrlty and orlentatlon.
The original design plan for the final phase of the Simba Run development proposed
one large buiHing on this Phase ll site. This building was designed to be similar to the
existing Simba buildings located immediately to the east. These buildings are
approximately 260 feet in length and approximately 50 feet in width. The project was
designed to take access otf ol Uonsridge Loop (one curb cut) with a fairly large surface
parking area, as well as one level of underground (structured) parking.
The current proposal before the PEC suggests a series of six smaller hJildings.
Access is divided between the North Fronkge Road and Uonsridge Loop, and the
parking for the project is almost equally divided between enclosed parking and surface
parking. Architecturally, the design is very similar to that of the existing Simba Run
project, although smaller in scale.
The staff believes that the applicant has done a reasonable job with the overall slte
planning of the project lo insure the project meets this criterion. We feel that the mass
ol he proposed buildings creates a transition from the existing Simba Run buildings b
the east, which are uprrvards of 60 feet in height, and the existing Timber Ridge
buildings to the west, which are approximately 30 teet in height. The four
condominium buildings proposed on the northern or upper bench of this site, are In
keeping wilh the multFfamily character of the neighborhood, with eadt building
consisting of four dwelling units. The employee building to lhe east also consisb of
lour dwelling units. The lower bench of this site is designed lo aocommodate four
attaehed townhomes, also meeting the multi-family definition. The townhomes have
been shifted slightly to the west to increase the distance between the existing Simba
Run building.
4
B. Uses, actlvlty and denslty whlch provlde a compatlble, efflclent and
workahle relatlonshlp wlth sunoundlng uses and actlvlty.
It is the staff's position that the proposed residenlial use on the site is compatibl€ with
the existing uses on surrounding properties. The proposed density (numbers of units)
is also compatible with adjacent properlies and would be in conforman@ with fie High
Density Hesidential identification that the Town of Vail Land Use Plan has placed on
this property. The proposal meeb the technical definition of a multi-family project. We
also believe it is positive that four employee housing units are incorporated into the
development.
C. Compllance wlth the parklng and loadtng requlrements a6 outllned h
Chapter 18.52.
The Town's parking requirements indicate that a total ot forty-six parldng spaces are
required for this Phase ll site. The applicant has proposed a total of fifty-one patHng
spaces for the projecl. The ratio of enclosed versus surface parking spaces is
approximately a fifty-fifty sdit, although the overall enclosed parking psrcontage lor the
entire Development Area B would be slightly less than the required 85%. Please see
the Zoning Analysis on Page 3 of this memorandum for the specific numbers.
Although this Phase ll development does technically meet the Town's parking
requirements, lhe stiaff would like to point out that the upper bench of the dsvelopment,
when analyzed individually, would be one parking space short. Additionally, the lower
bench of the development provides six *excess" parking spaces. The staff would
reeommend that one additional parking space be added to the upper development
area, at the west end of the site, so ihat adequate parking is available in close
proximity to units the parking is intended to serve. We feel that this additional parking
space can be added without significant modifications to the site plan or excesslve
gnding.
D. Conformlty wlth appllcable elements of the Vall Gomprehenslve Plan,
Town pollcles and Urban Deslgn Plans.
1. The Town of Vail land Use Plan identifies this area as High Density Residential
(HDR). High Density Residential is defined in the l-and Use Plan as follows:
'The housing in this category would typically
consist of multi-floored structures with denslties
exceeding fifteen drelling unils per buildable aore.
Other activities in this category would include
private recreational facilities, and privab parking
facilities and institutional/public uses such as
churches, fire stations and parks and open space
facilities.'
The proposed plan for lhe final phase of Simba Hun would set the overall
density lor Development Area B at 18.9 dwelling unitsy'acre.
The following are the applicable Land Use Plan goals and policies which ralate
to this proposal:
Goal 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled snvironment,
maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and
recreational uses to serve both the visitor and permanent
resident.
Goal 1.12 Vail should ac'commodate most of the additional growth in
existing developed areas (infill areas).
Goal 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primadly In
existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where
high hazards do not exist.
Goal 5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available trrough
private etforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the
Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions.
Goal 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the ma*et place
demands for a full range of housing types.
Goal 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing needs shoukl ba
accommodated at varied sites throughout the community.
The statf believes the project is in compliance with the Town's Land Use Plan.
ldentlflcatlon and mltlgatlon of natural and/or geologlc hazards that aftect
the property on whlch the speclal development dlstrlct ls proposed.
This project site is located within a high severily rockfall hazard zone. The applicant's
geologist, Nicholas lampiris, has reviewed the proposed site plan and has agreed that
the berming along Lionsridge Loop Fload (south side), combined with intemal mitigation
for the two eastern-most buildings, is sufficient to mitigate the rockfall hazard. Please
see lhe attached letters from Nicholas Lampiris at the end of this memorandum.
F. Slte plan, bultdlng deslgn and locatlon and open space prcvlslons
deslgned to produce a functlonal development responslve and sensltlve
to natural fEatures, vegetatlon and overall aesthetlc quallty of the
communlty.
The statf believes that the applicant has been responsive to the PEc's suggestions
regarding minor modifications lo the site plan. We believe that he minor shifting nade
to &e building locations has resulted in maintaining adequate distances between lhe
Phase ll project and the existing Simba Run building. The project would continue to
exceed the 20% maximum site coverage for Development Area B, however, the statt
believes that the overall sib planning lor the project is acceptiabte artd that tre
proposed 31% site co\rerage is reasonable given the approved density. All of the
building locations have been sited to take advantage ol vicws both to the east and to
the west The site plan has also been modified to accommodate the needs of the Vail
Fire Department.
The applicant has modified the upper bench of the development and has eliminated a[
parking within the required z0-foot lront setback area. otre of the three proposed curb
cub off of Lionsridge Loop has also been eliminated. The staff betieves that all of
these changes are positive changes and result in a higher quality project which will
further enhance its compatibility wi$r the immediate neighborhood.
G. A clrculation system deslgned for both vEhlcles and pedestrlans
addresslng on and oft-slte trafflc clrculatlon.
Site PlanA/ehicular Access (CDOT access oermitt.
Access lo the lower bench of lhis site, to the four lownhouse-type' units, is proposed
via a curb cut otf of the North Frontage Road. Access to the units on the northem or
upper bench of this site is designed as a series of two curb culs off of Lionsridge loop
Road. A Colorado Department of Transportation access permit will be required before
a building permit ean be released for the four units that take access otf the North
Frontage Road.
Future Simba Underoass.
As discussed in the recently adopted VailTransportation Master Plan, the construction
ol an l-70 underpass in the vicinity of Simba Run, is proposed as a ffrst priority
recommendation for both the West Vail interchange and the Main Vail interc-hange
lmprovements. The underpass would be constructed immediately opposite the
propooed curlo eut for the lower bench development. To accommodats the underpass,
it would be necessary to lower the North Frontage Road approximately 13lo 15 feet in
this area. The applicant has submitted a regrading plan which indicates the regrading
which would be necessary to accommodate the future l-70 underpass. lt appears that
the applicant's proposed design would not be in conflict with the fuiure underpass, and
the Town Engineer has approved the access and regrading plans.
Pedestrian Access.
The staff has requested that the applicant pursue the possibility of locatirq a public
pedestrian path through he property so that pedestrian access can be maintiained trom
the Lionsridge Loop area down to the North Frontage Road. We believe that this
pedestrian access would become even more critical should the proposed Sinba
underpass be @nstructed. The applicant has agreed that such a public eassment
through the property would make good planning sense, however, the applicant is
con@rned about the potential liability and maintenance issues sunounding a public
pedestrian path. The applicant has agreed to consider adding a pedestrian connection
through the property should the Town Attorney be able to provide them with a level ol
comfort regarding the liability concems.
H. Functlonal and sesthetlc landscaplng and open space In order to optlmlze
and preserve natural features, recreatlon, vlews and functlons.
At the suggestion of the Planning and Environmental Commission, the applicant hElsi
modified the poposed landscaping plan to include larger evergreen trees (12 - 15 feet
in height) at the base of lhe upper development area. Additional screening has been
provided throughout $re site, and fre project as a whole does meet the requird 60%
minimum landscaped area. The existing recreation/bike path has been realigned so
that it crosses the lower development area approximately 40 feet north of the
driveway's intersection with the North Frontage Hoad. This was done at the request of
ths PEC. Additionally, the bike path meanders slightly to the south of the townhomes.
Overall, staff believes that the landscaping plan provides adequate scregning and
green space.
l. Phaslng plan or subdlvlslon plan that will malntaln a workable, functlonal
and efficlent relatlonshlp throughout the development ot the speclal
development dlstrict.
Since the initial PEC work session, the applicant has modified the project's phasing
plan. Phase I would now consist ol the two condominium buildings located on the
northwest corner of the site. This would consist of a total of eight dwelling units.
Phase ll would include the remaining two buildings in the upper development area and
the employee building. The final phase of the project would consist of the four
townhomes located on lhe lower bench of the property. The statf believes that the
applicant's modifications to the phasing dan are now acceptable.
v. STAE:RECOMMENDAflON
The staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a major modifica$on to
Special Development District No. 5. We believe that the modifications which have been made
to the project, since the initial PEC work session, have bror.qht the project lnto comfliance
with the nine Special Development District review criteria listed in this memorandum.
With regard to the development standards as indicated in the Zoning Analysis section of this
memorandum, the staff does acknowledge that ths proiect is over on site coverage and is
slightly under on the required enclosed parking percentage. With regard to site coverage, the
Phase I development on this site (the existing Simba Run buildings) has already exceeded the
20% maximum site coverage. We think that the total site coverage proposed, 31%, is
reasonable given the high density residential nature of this project. As a point of Gpmparison,
should this property have been zoned High Density Multi-Family, the ma(imum allowable site
coverage; according tro curent Town of Vail zoning, would be 55%. Th6 statt firds that the
proposed 31% sits coverage and the overall site plan design is reasonable.
Although the applicant has not met the required 85o/o enclosed parking per€ntage for the
entire Development Area B, the staff does find that the applicant has deslgned the project with
I
all of the surface parking located on the north sicle ot the buildings, and that the proposed
82olo enclosed parking is reasonable. Again, we would point out that if the property had been
zoned High Density Multi-Family, the required enclosed parking percentage wouH be 757o.
In summary, the staff is recommending approval with the understanding that th€ applicant
agrees wlth lhe following oonditions, and we believe the project substiantially complies wih the
nine SDD review criteria as indicat€d in this memorandum. The conditions are as follorrvs:
1. The applicant shall provide one additional parking space on the westem end ol
lhe upper development area.
2. The Town shall not issue a Temporary Certilicate ol Occupanry for any of th6
Phase ll condominiums until such time as TCO's have been issued for all four
units in the employee housing building.
3. The applicant agrees that if the liability issues conceming the construc{ion and
maintenanc€ of a publlc pedestrian path/easement through the property can be
resolved with the Town Attorney, the applicant shall construct a pdesfiian path
and grant a public access ensement to the Town of Vail.
4. A Colorado Department of Transportation access permit shall be granted prior
to the issuance of any building or grading permits for the lower bench of the
development (four townhomes).
q:Vgc\memos\simba. 524
=J. $--r.lt t-
v,
#Lh
I
\t,
:,,V*,\' r
rt
k\
i\
I\f'
I
I
0-
q
.1
rIIr
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
wni
v-/r\..+4
f0tlt$l,l
I
tJ
s
. .,t
It
TI
i
2
1d
::pl\;E
K)/I
N \
1\
.l
t.vc
\ tou
H
$4,
ts
Ji
.lil_-
!
I
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSUL'ING GEOLOGIST
0185 INGERSOLL |jNE
stLT, ooLoRADo 81652
(303) 876€100 e1 Hounsl
Apr i l. l B, 1993
$sl i. v Frai nerd . , .. :
l"lcr {: r'lr Arcl'ri tectg
145 EsEt l'leador.r l}^ive
Er r:ssr o;irrj s at Va i IVaiI, CO 81657
FtE: Eiavny Vi I I as
c
l1c'.= r cl- I 1*,.
I frave r err,,:i eulmd the si te of the re.f erenced prrqjecf as ghorrln on
thaa &ccompanyi.ng nap {or Furpo5e€ o{ Sock Fall review .fsr the.1nl.lnn.i\rai]..T|renorthtsrnforrrr-rnitffiiqrr
Rnnl,r{:;rl1 ilnn* d,"re to the outcr-opping o+ sandstone on the other:lirJci r:{ [hce Lion's Ridge Lnnp. ]'he BeconrJ {:ier af ltnits is nr:t
i n h.he l-ral ar-cl : crnt: n
-llrisi :i*l in a 1oc.:r'Lit:n nlrtlro the ridgeo cor-rtxri ni ns ths 6D!.rrce ni:
F ot f,,:i-i'f. i.ii I .i:al I irrq roct*:;, iq at a lor.r L c.._'vel $ith r.esFr.tr?f t$ this
*:i t i;.'::i i:r lri: r,-ric:!rl; ;:ar: r- r.'-,iLc h ti.re ncrr-the5n.:gites" 'l'i.r e :..ncks-, t\, i l l
ililv{:-! '::: iq1r'ri,i:ir:i:rni:: c.fnr:irqjy 5o th.rt &iti:qai:innJ,{il.i b .
[.hrrr.,' r-:.n:.i::r.h ]i r.: i-t.rt:[rg .Jsctrr .ah pr.,,:l {:hi* pr-nposed dgvetnprnerrt,n hut.
tlir"r l--*i:rri ;-{raql ru,i I I catch sorne n.f t-htrn. The ha?ard i ncreases toi:hu r.l"::i L !.rlrerFJ t".he ri dqe bFgomesi hi gher n therehy i. mparti nr:t trrore .l,:i.n+'r:ic f,rnergy to potential *aLling r-oi:hs.
.[ prnpnrle several alternatives to sutbstant j. al l\, minimizn the
h;lzar-cl {rom {a}J. inq:.e+'r*1.'u. -A f our {oo{:. high berm
rmn'; tr' ltr:tcld al anr; 'tfre south ffi e $i. teg;ry not_ be a ecauSe may er'{ere r.,triqht r:f rl*y" Anotfrer step which can be taken is to dgsiqn tire
tcl]ll (nnr-ilr *idq) of esch r]f these {our units tn.a sffiffi+trq4! tnnrth !!ic,e) of esch r:.f these tour units tfr.a strenf,th o+a{+
n eFe Snoul cl be no rrrinFtr tlrat rockg canirot crarstr {frrournfr t6enrlr*o ifr*i-Ttn trLlr
lnqrl tn urotect tfre brittle concretu.. I{.possible," both nf these
o the ie 3
lj-ec"'t fti,.Jh. r.r i t.h the ssrne' strength gi ven ahover. Thi g n*rI I coul d
a\i;5o lfe of Fjtnl I rrlac€d Iarge (3 {oot) borrlder*;. Becauge rif then;rture! o.f Lhe har$rcl and thei optione {or mitigation, I sLrgg*st*.hat .f i,n.:rl p1ans, be revier.led hy.yourr- engirreer elnd me ffii?
ci'.zi l. enrJi ner-rr' .nay. siuqq(Est -arr energy aheartring .f .rclng Fuch as
clq*i_LnE strnulrl be r-ttili.eedo especially {or1_ths tr..ro un i tg.
...rr..rL 'rr.r:rtr. p.r crn,:$ I]r: reVIetJFB ny. yoLff- BnqlnFet' *nCl mt3 tO|r DT,neF
Een'
t
The r:nnstrttct i rrn , o.f *hesle u
tql rrOt increase the hal|to other
I
'o,' an slrc
thrs rc)
or
osed miticlatir:rnn
d
(?
t.l
pr*l i rni lary conceptnaL irations,
erty atrlictune*
' /" vu q l|1v4/r\
l"li chol a= tanpi ri s
Consul ting lieol o6ri l;t-
cl-eaEements les oF E o'f any kl nd.elre qlretlti clns please contact rre,es?F ec x a '',,r durinq yclr-ry-
He! aB 't3 tr53 68VMAx515l ls?|itr r.a
Nlchola$ LarnPiris, Ph'D'
ool$ii,[ ( l.{u ololacJl$T
01ES lNgtHttotL LANE
s,LT. cotolrApo 0t05?
oog.,*tt *?H),rtot
l'lay 16r 1??5
8rl 1y Brrtnrrdllortrr AFChitrcta
14$ Errt ll||rdaH lrrvc
Crolrrsrdr rt vrtlVrllr CO 8f&U7
REr Brvoy Vtllrl
D:rr Srllvt
I hrvr rlvilt{Gd thr rit: Flrn Fhlch Ytru hrvl rrcrntly rrntt 'lprr our clllcurrlonsr fEr nittgrtrdl b+ trtr rcrck frlt hrtrrd rt
thr rtte. Ysu htv: iddrrrnil my Eonctrnl vrrY rnrl. but thlFr r?F
rtifl- n "oupir of chrngct or edlttront flhtch rhoulrl br
I ntrorpsrrtrd.
tdlth thl bernr in plref rt ycu hrvr dr{1nt6 th:ml vrry #rrr rsahr
crn rrrch ttr: r,r:rtrin {our irnttr, tnslr blclurr thrl lrsntr cf
[fio.r-unftr eri fi|tre {orn o{ girrg:r, I rtn not Eonerrrtrd thrt
drrtiltgr etn oecur to livtng qurrtrrr. Trrr nrtrrnmort unltr
hor{tvtrr r;htrt roCt +rff firlerdl rfr lrta 1w?rll 611 3lexnr
b.ril lnd no Er|'eg; to protrst ltvtng qutrttrt' Thtr!{Errt I
rccomnend r irrr:* +oo1 'hlEh *t*nr refl bn thr north Hrll rthltrh
rhoutd hrvt t rtrenqth s{-4o0 poundr Fer tqutrr {oot rnd HoEd
dnorr ai rtrong ar frariblr ln thrt well'
Allo,therri|tbrrrelttnthrbrrmlnfrontg+thantxtunltto
thF Hrtt for drtv-wry tctrtlr. Thr rxPorGd pcrtton_of t'fir untt
r+hich lr ndt grrtor ihould bl thr rtmt rtrrngth l$tl to thFtf
{nt' I'f thrFr .rt rtilt qugttonr eontect tttt'
Conrulttng grtllogtrt
Hetum to h;Ee
Town Planner
:l-/F.IJ
'ri!
to
lN'rER - DEPARTT4EHTAL FEV|EIU
PRO.JEST:
DA]E SJBI{INED:
COMHEHTS I{EEDED
BRIEF BESCRIPTION
PUBLIC I'TT]RKs
Reviewed by
Cornrnen ts: )
THE PROPOSAL
BY:
OF
D 3-,a^' *1*
L;. , L. tf b..,o a-, ) *l*,, J rr,. a* I
ho- ,.-"'t I +kL'*J =.^lr2 ln J"n [o *..1h _1L.,
l;,,-,. | -l *f u_ ,,,*l\bu
z) -l f-t-, e er.,,.,!, ^ dno:^ld P'7*'9 - -r/?h
"'*':::.^::'^,*",711,*,,
+ v Yo,th I ' JLruqh 4* prry#+A. Ar tt t! ccJ/a;n7 ee**nl w;(( k &Jc r^lel.
=) +ho,t :-G*=l^
cdos^nc
Dr-r(,r,..,,'J .Jr'\ =
b) 5,'L d'n"-:'.p. -* a s [ro- lJr, ,^,; ( [ e-lgo ru-Jla'c- sho--..,-
') tL ,--^- \n,--P{-J
fo>t.,LL--(r.tu-'t-e"
Coa,a-Lc-( ,. ,,,..bl*^^ 7u b t,.-
lr,*.,
"r. Jr*
/-L
4)
,)
8,)
Q:t>trC-e .n- ,*- I t^
)z u,n;lt Ze, ,--,Lctp*;4
/Z' ur"Je>, *.,)a.
L
s-f , ,',-.--
t-'-1
L",--) ?c.,1 )r,,l/r
U
l.r'r. J L*,- z un, l- g
i'L-x^ L JL"-
0ste:
^( 6"^"1-ol- 2".J .s.t1.?3
)
Retum to
Town Planner
DATE oF PUBLIO HEARING .g- zo' z< __
COMMENTS NEEDED BY: 4.2r-qi
("* "h14\
LLI;. bJoc-Kt
/ t/ ,t
Flevieuved by: GEeq ue I ( _Date:.
Comments:
1,.'il"r'€''l 't3 ?,sf,8t188
1}18)€151
l:Er i er
Nicirolau LamPiris, Ph.D.
coN$rJL llNu {tEC,LQGls r
0185 lN(ikH5crl.L LANE
Sit.T. CCL()F^ tlo 010!?
{313) IJI{;.4)4C0 t2.4 HOU11S)
flay IE r l9?I
limlly llreinffrd
['lorter Ar i:hl lectis
14T Heet f{€fldst4 IJrrv€
$rr}4Hrt).*t1E at Vel L
Vetlo CO fli&$7
iilll S*'rn1 V{IlEs.
r..,.1.:;i. *1,.'" 1. i ',"'I
I h*ve r6vi*bigti ther gitE FI #,r1 lt'lhi {:n yclu hRYBI t r*ct*ntly merrt ' ;rn
pei- $t.rr rJi*Etl,sxlcln6r f or initig{trofi uf trlu rur:}t f .*I I llaBdsrtl at
itrt* xi tw" yr.,rr ir*va sr3clrrhssd ffiy [.Jn{:i}rnir} vi*r'y x|rl J. i.ri.t | 1:'htrrtF utP'lh
ati1l ;i cauplr+ o{: changea ffr Rdtlttlons wntch sht;r*} r'l be
indc'rp$r.gt{id.
b,lJ th the hs!'inis in plar* sYs yRLl hsvs' dFfina thsrng very f r:u rt-tr+i$
trifln t.e.ACh tl-rr* ti1;gf r,.'ri! '$o*r' tiflltRr BiiC r i: i-l{:,:i ti'3fl the f r-r;rr ttr+ o*
tfi*,** ,ttitt* irrL? in thr"o f ilrm rrf {aragFs. I an n$t' G$fIc 6rr- r'rr:'iJ hhc't
,lt, t;O* lcgir occur tn 1ivinfi i?ili{!-tEri-6' The ggstgrnma1st unl{:!
l-roFtpV{a1- r t!11*f.ci tilEk {ali il&s.*r'rig #.f E lr-l',# iisvlt,-ai tl d"B ''1 I ()wt-'f
tli4r.n snfl '1o qar+fgs lir proi';e*t I i vinfl qu*rt'$rs" f.ir*ref {}r.pt I 'l
retromnsnd a itrret {o6t'hlg.h ptnr* xall nn tha nqfth wirll l'{htR
nhoul C havA A Btrnnqlh Oi: 4it{) lrourtdr+ pt?r sL}L{&i"te {tl!fit, dr1(1 ul!"itr6
rln*rr* as eijrt:nft aE+ {ear'{ h}{* tn tlt*t vlal I "
Al.:ri:, thcir,-s i.i' it [:r-€'i,*h i n tht* i:r*r'il I n $r'onl i.; i ill:.1 fil:.:. ':. '.ii rl 1l i:
'']th*i wmst {or dri,V#r,liiy t'?fii:c*tlfi. f tel *;rp c;l'r*ld i:i:r"f *r:iit $f 11hi3 utlr!:
v.,ir:[ *tr I sr trnt {Jaraf,e shrrutrJ b€ fli]& siriejr strenqbh w'?11' I i:cr tnre€
do*.e{. 1'F til&!"s ,srs riti l 1 questl r:tts dt?t1l'act mB'
ilinc;l-rflY I jl -ltfu'/u{r, ''/*7*,
rii rholae l-arnPl nf n
{clnsul tj'n6 {Soologi et
.l'lay "!6 t13 tr53
A Fmt lrlrld corycfdon
Cf!l'r{|itbrtvdl
l4S Eirl urdil Drhr
Vd, c€lordoA1||$7
(s{E) .07061qt PHqt{E
{5Gr},r764710 FD(
BAE0 SHH|-AXS1SIlsrr iec
,
nel .zqrz..
hrahero{'
2-.Number uf pages senl inctuding sovor page
lf you rtcoivc on cnu!'in trenemlseion, please eall {303} 476-5105
aewantrs lhliLt;,, l*,n i1 . du,r laksf ,
MorurnAnculTEcrs ,
TELECOPIER TRANSHITTAL SHEET
"rtDArE f ho lq+ TftnE lqt'{Z aih\
ro Wbz !4oltieL' .,
COITIPANY T,O.V.
FAX#
FROiI
q t I.t
)r
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0185 INGEBSOLL LANE
srLT, coLoBADO 8165A
@3) 87oAO0 (a4 HOURS)
/.'\nr'".:i I lfi)r 1??11;
l:ii"r .1. ll, y litr',:r i n,i.::r'd
l"k:rr l: r,:rr llrr.:l"r:i. t r+ct::,;
I llli liii**:;t I'leacl$r,.] IJr" i ':e[]r mvi*,,r- o;lt,i ri i:t'h, Viii.:t
V.rnil, L:Ll fll:tAi57
Ftlri r |jril.t\,t:}y \ti. iL .[ *i'.1;
Il r'r .r r {i:l.n Ll. v I
.l har,,(il r'$,1\,.:i mwmd {hn+ ti, i, t,sl n,f *hen y"m,{:srrtilnglild iry"e;i mm{, u,r*ii ,,$h $r,rn c}n
flhr.+ ,rcr::illrpany), nq rn#rp {: or p r"Ffl$$fi; $.f ilnr: l,: fi*l l. teuJ,er+ .f nr tho'.|{}[{|l$.i:\'].lL:il''..|'.herrorfhfir"r}.f$t,lf-r,'rrr:i.f^ffi".|iq;lr
lltti::1,: {r i:tI ll. I*in*:r dt.r*r ttr {:ha,: cru{:cr"{t}pf i nfl *:.f randilitlr}flF;r fifl t h{ii! flt l-r r,i!r'
+ri.rJr'.'r ${: i':frtl,.l 1,...:irin'ril Fli.riqm [".m$1t,, 1"h* riii'irt:$nd.hisr r:r.f lrni,t-r+ ii,ti$ t"t{:,ti
:i f-r 'L:h(+ h s,l:i1 *nt-{J .;tflnr:?,,
-l lr:i. li:i 1i:t i.n,1 :l ur.:.:!Li, c;n wlttiilr'# 'Llret ;- i. clen, crunt:ilj.rr :i. rrr.l f: h {i'.r F;tl.rr'{:i:r ${
pnf:,i:rtri:: i.'lil .f fil1ii"lfl r'c:*:lr*;, :i,.t ;:l i; *r ll ul., ll. nrvr+l l,;i'hh r-+spglr.: [ {:tr ffrt:l
1l;:jt-il:lt:iilrl'({:t"t:ic:!'.:lii|:..jtl.lf"l.il.,tti:h
h;:rvn 'i,: ilitrl ;i. tl i.ciitui.. 11,1"iq',,v",;ry :*,i:r 'klt+rt rnj.tf $atj.nrr t!i..l.i Lrt.:.:t r.rr:*:$lt+*i,irr:v"
|'l.''r:1vt''r'n.::i.|l.,irLr]lt*i-t,rl:ktii${:::fl,.lr-.1th|:J\,i..lttrirli[r:irpr:rlreltir1a*vtllr.|t:|fGiT,_-Iir-.[
'Lht-,1 1..., i:*:; r-*iilrl r,li. !..1. c;itrh $r:rncr fl.f t"hc'ifi. . Tl-rcl Ir*earcl i fi*reel*imre 1: qr
t: lt t'i.r Htlrii* t^,i1trit- {fr i:hm r-i clqw hermmf;rgi hi r;;1h er,r u ther-eLry i rrp,nrti n r,:t rfi$r'61
[,:i.rrtll{:i.{: riirn{i+r'iJ}/ tn yrntont,i;r], .f .n,l Li,np r-onh:ei .
1, 6tt*npnnm rumvs:rr, *rll. ,ll. t e:r'rrln{: j. vr'Etl tln $Ltlirrstarr{::i *xl l',, p.1.nirn:i. lrn thr:
lr.:,i:;rr-cl {: r"t:n '{:al...t i.net r+rc },:r*,, . A {our .{ ortti h j,srh hHr.nt -firisv l:, F.:t:nn$tl't"tt'::tt.'tinli'trnq.[l|"tl+grrlr'h,l'ri.tc,:l;"
Il-tl1"' fll{:ty rlflT- lf(+ i!1I.1. Cll,{,$l n DeCAt,tFF l.t fnity :t. nt$.lr'{:(iit"fl tl:1. f h 1-- her r-c},flf,1rirth* r::.f.rtr,:.iy^ f.lnm1rhr+r mtep which cinn fre takmn i;'l; tcr dqf;t:r,ff_ry'{:r'$rlf (rtnr-*ft *iiiclcr) tr'$ tsermh { thrr$,tli .f ur"rr r"rni. b.*i Litr ": strEid[li-li{'
,".,t t: I ri:ar,::t /.1,-t(:,) i:lc)t..!f)#t' ti 6l Lt&11. dil .t'cr$'[ f nr. fi 1 ara$ L .f: ur "ti {ijr[B'b aL]t:rvq\
fi i riii r acle ,,etr $ sfi ot.l
C:Ii,'I
ll. ctr.:t*:i
'Jq{ii
Ilr;rt r'*r:ILr r;;lr;rrrnt-cr",*rr;|r tlr.r nirrlliTtr+.'m :i.nf-rr tnll'. uiIT
L ctri:t :i n {i:r.fl1y' rnriy tir.rgqesit an erlrrr"cJy ahrorh:irr1; .f .1t:1t"tq Eit..rcfr *rg
i: r:r prmhe*t t: fr i:l hr':i 1::tll. ea cmncrepttil"Iu] lJl^$'[{i.lfl:t tfri lrr:i, ttl ea {:mnf,rt?ttir" ..I'fi, pn$jr,ihrl,st,, f;r otl I'r m'C: t l-t riln{ir
;yn::; shr:lt..rl r,I h n-" r-rti,tirgd, eg;p,acint iy + rtr-t.friil t'tesiteirrn twn r..rir j. tg,-"
,t. .,, .t. t. ...l"r
Ie,'r'[ lr r qlr r.r:l tl'r {:hn s.lrrn# gll:rerrqth civer.r lirtrflvet " -l ir:i ii: t,rij], I
i\.l :'iifi l)il r:r.f wt,-'.|.:1, pL$fi(,itd J.,iilr. {'il ( l:ii .{:nlr.h ) h(:rr..r.[clers. H{ tiitfi ii,rij$,p
r: oL.r I cl
*r'f; t ht*
l,ilLt.rr"r,..r of: 'khrl hn:ar"cl arrd thel mptinrrE.|:or- niti-qiiri:.:i.ntto i[ sr..r.qgriirr:;i;
i:: h,.,tt ,i: :i n,:l.l p.l ,ilnl;i tr cl t- {.",\, i {*r.JBtJ hry yot"rr- $r}ftq:i tl tit(!t- ;:ind mn ( nFffir-.'
gr.r**;mr:lrn i ca l elxpirirr-t ) *nrm # prcd{ ij,irred rTr{*thr:ci1$ hi,.lrre hHr+n chnr'fiHn,
'. 3l
i*
't'
V-n-il: n yii:l r. t-t (::t :i nlr u.i t lr r.t s cl tt '$r' an\/ n.fi [: h *l ori,mcl m:i, {i,
t i c L:. :i, ti u r" ot i.t .{ii r.,r hm l"r in*.:lrd to lr{:l"rer' ftr"n$ort,r; t:: r;r-t c: t t.t l^ t'"t ri$
1.{ -c}.f: -"w,:ny u . hr,,r:i L r1i. nq1*, r$*dtii , $it r"u$t*i 0.la{5$m$:,!n I tir .'
r.i.r i5 {)r" .{;iir: :i. l.:i. tTcr!!"i c}r r'LTl-EjE-i5F dpeP-T-itj !E Ltt: i:rr-l }.'l,;:incl"
,l r- til tlt..rtii'*1: i nns:i 6rlL *:.u.l:*n rc)ntn{lt:i: fti1ii!, tilli;J:*lr:i ;l}TE r.,lr x t) r:J yt)t'ry-
fii j. rt c riy- e .1. y ,, -o./7 L{" -.-'i'/vurv ry\
hli ti:{ro1. n:i |.....:r,$rF:i. r-ii. 1:i
.[,]on,sLr I t i. n q {}Hi:}:l mt:l :i. *t
1:: r' ur .l. :i. m ri. i"i itu' V {:ofii::nlttlr.nl i.:":it:[mn*,,
I o
1993 APPROVED SDD
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
t
!l-ql
r rlt-
al
I
{
r
It-
a
!
t
0
-llt
tr
I
It
$
F
l1. tl i|l \ r
)^! I
I
I@re"u,a
0
,.?Loj
(t i
.l
I 4
1I
i
I
)I
i1
IrIt
T
\,
(..
ut
e
W
Ir|^\L?t\
I
I
"r>
itil
ltrIttlt
lril
lotr
tft-
oa
0l{
' I tl/rt l//f"-r--
@V
_9;
<': {
fiI
t
?!t{)
c
F
!t
z.
I
I
(tt
F
r'
I
I
I
l/
:ihr
J
o
O/'
() i).
:\{ll
tiNIit \
a
4r
4
s
o
o
o^\oi)
{"
;I
lr
ll
i
l+
1
\3
. Savoy Villas
sp.d.l Oo.-t r.t .t oatnlrr
Vrll. Coloardo
\,ll'lIll [,
i/ f
I t lrr-J rr / /ii.-->.--
I
It
I,
il
tl
I
t,
I
It
{
1+s
t+
1
. Savoy Villas
6o.d.l OG.*Ftr{ d|'|c' Vrlt. Colo.rdo
H\rl;lic
Ii t,il r
Jt.l g:
l-....-"---\lt!==4--
r
0l-l
firi
.'-,]
I!t
?
I
j
t
I
i
'\
I
I
I
ftr
\r\q
o l1\r.tv
o.r ;;\'' .qi" ^'d"
il
I
I'f
tI{lIn.
\I
o
i\:,;,\ ti^>{.--\
I
lt
t/
F.
, lt,|'rli
I lrrr
'lF
Fl!
I
,, c' lraa
,t
"9;:
o
c)
t
\
,;ii 1":4-l
'rl I
.?.il
tr t\I,".
t
lri.
\\
\'
il \,il
$rrj.iFt :Savoy Vlllas
l?.a.i Da.bF.lr Fb'€
Yrfi, Cob.rdo
'.Ki\v'
t
I
l$'15
Ir
lp
tgtl
IG
lLl:'
l-*rt
Io
t
II
hrt
Hr.
lnr
lrI
n
-6
-'\,\,tf
I
I
I
It
t1
lF
IF
E
ll.
I,l
l,
I
".-F-t.t,;l-\U\t
(n\.'
\P
f\
/r<_-/
i.. ('{ \,v
.lrltlrtrl
l;rl
L__i
.Savoy.Villas_
S9.d.l orv l,orr!.|{ oirdc' Vrll. Colondo
[-
Art
1995 PROPOSED SDD
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
ro
I
\
\\\
\\
t\ \
T,\ \
\,, i
o\ \
\N'v'
\
h
t\i\
\\
ti,lI rl
{.I\
\\\
rlr
It
(
'I j
it
I,a..'' *\]'
l"o \o\ \
,'
it
.t
f3
i{
.t
S i,*nier;
:
{ii
f,'l/
?,- rjll
'1r
p
q
;l
TIil
cz
fl
T
fi
'(\^' ,"'\S
(\
\
tr\
\\'\
9\\\\i \l \,'\ l, I
L(,'' \'\J, \.\\ \oN \r,-)
ffi\
\\
ri;\
i)\
\
"3
, \..,
\
ra
4
t
z
h
ir
F
2t
I
1
ll
dt
E
s
g
l.!
iv.
IT
I
l
:
Savoy Villas
3!d tli.tcm.i CXdlc
Vr[, Colo.]5
o
i\
\[
$
Niti
N\:
W't"
N, '\
[)\, i,\
\l)\\\ '_, \
\\\) .-.,/ '.i \/^) \t\cc\\t r-)
..N
. )\
i$., -!t
'i ili{ I
f
47 ...
tl
,s
ir
L
I
l 0
$
U-7
\,
!
.r
T
?
o
1^
t^eil
+
o..o6
aie i ..I{l } cic-? i P !iiir I.:it q i
lrr i '
lI l
o..."@ffi
;iaiio: r it
iililiiiiH
f, iiiF I i;
: li i5g
I
,I
I
I
af
$
t
I
'fu'-'ffi€* i
&-.g '
fu. ii i.,SEq ii iiiB* **
ffia.', i l": i. __*., llpIK'** it#ltr @ff^ii & rft -st*'#ff - iu* R
'. , i.* i, qil d ,""L%
"
'ii{ iri
T F.g^-".i ',,\ : --i'W*"+i W*59'\lrr
',- ' \i ,W- il,
\. \,9 I \iti
s
ii;r'ffi;i 1 T
iit Emmff'Fmfl;' iiiffi- '
I i | ;1 Fl,l-l'FrFl 11'1'11Fl
a
-r
Ifn
-)
I
b
ii
:tiit
"r/
tItf
I
t
I
t8aa
!irtt;tl
ii
It
li
iifi
!
lt
If
l
t
a
aI
I
t
i
a
I
+
-
ti,
lr--..--.-
,r.--*-,it
a
h,i
l"l
,
l(
l-!t-tItr
l"i,.L i
f
Savoy Villas
Sp.(r Dd.lerstt $|[in
V.ll. Colorad,o
oo
lrllr*i
L-..1
I
ao
!-./
1.?5 r-:
5 6 rL-';H IF
;c I
-3 lIts
='l-
;, -,,'t-ri>-hz
-t* 9-)/ :(.-r I
ii
xF >
$F ;
SAVOY VILLAS
SPECIIL D EltELOPr,t ENr DlsrRlc!! 5
VAIL, COLORADO
Io
a );7
;=5 s '\-'l1!i '.r
I? ^ rFilat*- S I
!i$s,=
di*
; :ir u
_ : t!6 ^1,;>a -lt2
>lfu.
N
t'SAVOY VILLAS
SPECIAL DEVgtOPUEfiT DIS|RICT 5
VAL COLOR-ADO
lrt,;
.T
.+tl.\,
ll f-
'IFFI
!-J
iil-
;lr--lt-
:ii>-iiz
A>.i-^ J-(_J/
c< i'
Ero
H3=
r"o 7
t!e
zo
tn
E>itr, I
ir
f'SAVOY VILLAS
SPECIAL DEI'EIOPIIENT DIS'TRICI 5
V{L COI'RADO
tI
.\z
t<llrli"
u)
IJia
\rl'K i .3
-F3
SAVOY VILLAS
SPECIAL DEVET,OPIIENT DISTRICT 5
vAlL co[4aaDo
o
c
z
c)
t
X
i>il^1 r
,'
:SAVOY VILLAS
SPECIAL DEYEI'PSENT DISIRICT 5
VAJL. COI'RADO
lp
z
v,
x
t>igJl
;,,
SAVOY VILLAS
SPECIAL DSVEI,OPMENT DIS'TRICT 5
v &. coLoR^oo
o\
I
t
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIO}f- " "-y
1.
PRESENT
Oiana Donovan Allison Lassoe
Jeff Bowen
Greg Amsden
Kathy Langenwalter
Dalton Williams
BillAnderson
MAY 10, 1993
MINUTES
ABSENT
Simba Land CorporationArValid Said
Mike Mollica
FIL E COPY
STAFF
Kristan Pritz
Mike Mollica
Andy Knudtsen
Jim Curnutte
Tim Devlin
Starting at approximately 1:15 p.m., the Planning and Environmental Commission was
calted to order for a work sesslon for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the
development of the remaining portion ot the $fi*n Rs| SSD, Savoy Villas, located at
1100 North Frontage Road, more specifically described as follows:
That part ol th€ First Supplemental Map for Simba Flun Condominium, according 10 the map thsreol
recorded in ths oflice ot th€ Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, dsscrib€d as lollows:
B€ginning at the most southwesterly corner of said map, thenca the tollowing three cours€s along the
wesrerly lines ol said map; 1) NO3o33'01"E 160.79 feet; 2) N12"50'S3"E 144.72 f€sl; 3) N17'56'03" 70.60
f€sl; th€ncs, depaning said westerly line, S13'16'03'W 157.26 t€61, th€nc€ S76o4it'57"E 91,50 feet; thencs
N13.16'03"E 35.00 feet; thonce S76"43'57"E 72.31 t€el to the easterly line of said map; thence the following
two courses along the Easterly and southeastorly lines of said map; 'l) S24'44'57"E 52.38 feet; 2)
S5f5o'29"W 272.50 feet to the Point ol Beginning, containing 0.6134 acr€s, mors or less; and
That part of Simba Run, according to the map thereof, recoded in Book 3.|2 at PagE 763 in the Ofiice of
the Eagls County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described as follows:
Beginning at the most southerly corner ol said Simba Flun, thence ths follou/ing lour coursEs along lho
southwesterly and northwesterly lines of said Simba Run; 1) N37'09'31"W 233.28 feel; 2) 334.57 f€et along
the arc ot a curve to th€ left, having a radius of 1771.95 lsel, a cemral angl6 of 10o49'06", and a chord that
bears N42"13'20"E 334.07 teel; 3) N36%8'48" E 20l.SG feet; 4) 15.96 feet along the arc of a curue to ths
right, having a radius of 428.02 teet, a central angle ot 02'08'12', and a chord that bears N37b52'54' E
15.96 fe€l to a corn€r on the westerly boundary ol th€ First suppl€mental Map for simba Run
Condominium, according lo the map thereof recorded in tho ollice ol the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and
Hecorder; thance the lollowing four courses along sald wesleily boundary; 1) 521"5128'W 69.90 feet; 2)
S17.56'03'W 181.17iost; 3) S12"50'33'W 144.72 IeeU 4) 503'33'01"W 160.79 l6et to th€ southeaslerly line
of said Simba Run; thence, along said soulheaslerly lina, S52'50'29"W 113.08 fs€t to lhe Point of
Beginning, csntaining 1.560 acres, mor€ or less.
Applicant;
Planner:
Mike Mollica reviewed the staff memorandum to the PEC and discussed a number of
specific issues that the staff had identified as possible concerns regarding the project's
design.
Flanning and Environmental Commlsslon
May 10, 1993
Diana Donovan began the PEC comments by stating that it was her opinion that the
overall site planning for the Simba Run project just did not work. She felt that the
buildings were located too close together and that the parking was extremely
congested and also agreed with the staff's point that excessive backing and
maneuvering would be necessary to vacate a number of the parking spaces.
Dalton Williams agreed with Diana and stated that it was his feeling the sile ptanning
needed to be totally reworked.
Greg Amsden commented that the vehicular access to the employee housing building
is too tight. He suggested that the applicants consider shifting some of the buildings to
the southwest corner of the site, an atea he felt was being under utilized.
Jeff Bowen was concerned with the potential rockfall hazard on the property. He
suggested that the applicants specilically indicate the proposed mitigation for the
hazard.
Bill Anderson questioned how snow storage would be accommodated between the
buildings.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she was also concerned with the overall site planning
of the project and felt that the neighborhood is currently constructed as multi-family.
She suggested combining some of the four-plexes so that there would be more open
space and that the overall project would be more compatible with the neighborhood.
Dalton Williams recommended removing the eastern-most unit on the lower bench. He
felt that this eastern-most unit would block some of the existing views from the Simba
Run project.
Kathy Langenwalter again stated that she was concerned with putting smaller building
envelopes on a site that is surrounded by larger developments.
Dalton Williams suggested that moving the building envelopes could help solve the
parking concerns at this site. He also commenied that he would like to see all parking
in the 2o-foot setback eliminated.
Jeff Bowen stated that the proposed 30% site coverage for this project is excessive.
Greg Amsden commented that the northern buildings need to be rearranged or
condensed.
Jim Morter, the applicant's architect, siated that rockfall concerns will be addressed by
Nick Lampiris. He also said that he feels the proposed design of this project is
consistent with the Town's Land Use Plan and surounding properties in the area. He
lurther stated that private view corridors will be provided as a result of this projecfs
orientation.
Planning and Envlronmental Commisslon
May 10' 19ql 2
I
.J'
Jeff Bowen asked Jim what phase the employee housing units were proposed to be
built.
Jim Morter responded that employee housing units would be built in Phase lll-B of this
project. He also stated that with regard to Jeft's comment about site coverage, that
this phase of the project is at the allowed 20% but that when the entire site is
considered (including earlier portions of this project), site coverage is 30%. He said
that the proposed project is generally below what zoning for this site allows. He then
inquired of sta{f and the PEC what direction he needed to go in with regard to this
proposal.
Mike Mollica stated that the Fire Department has requested the location of all fire
hydrants proposed on the site. He said that he was still waiting for comments trom the
Public Works Department.
Greg Amsden siated that he would like to see the existing water line moved so that
some of the proposed building envelopes could be moved or shifted around. He also
stated that he had no problem with the proposed exterior appearance of the project.
Diana Donovan stated that she felt that 43 feet is high for the four-plexes.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she had no problem with this proposal from an
arehitectural standpoint and added that maybe more of the buildings could be
clustered. She said that she would like to see "a physical and image distinction"
between the proposed project and the existing Simba Run buildings.
Bill Anderson stated that he would like to see the lower portion of this project pulled
away from the existing Simba Run buildings.
Dalton Williams agreed with Bill's comment.
Kathy Langenwalter stated that she would like to see the rockfall mitigation berms
indicated on the site plan.
Dalton Williams stated that he was opposed to the relocation of the bike path and
suggested the path meander between the trees.
Greg Amsden stated lhat he would like to see 12 to 15 foot tall trees placed on the site
at certain locations due to the height of the buildings.
Jim Morter then asked staff about the proposed underpass for lnterstate 70 at this
location.
Mike Mollica stated that Sally Brainerd, an architect in Morter's office, has completed a
conceptual grading plan and it appears to be compatible with this site.
Dalton Williams staied that he feels the existing Simba Run buildings have good
Planning and Environmental Commission
May 10, 1993 3
separation and that he would like to see this project follow suit.
.2. A request to review a referral from the US Forest Service to review a scoping proposal
regarding the installation of a cellular telephone site in East Vail.
Applicant: US WesUCellular One/US Forest Service
Planner: Andy Knudtsen\Shelly Mello
Diana Donovan inquired whether any changes had been rnade to this proposal since
the last time this item was before the PEC.
Flich Phelps with the US Forest Service stated that the water tank site is still being
focused on and that the height of the cellular telephone tower has yet to be
determined.
Larry Storms with Cellutar One stated that the tower would consist of a wood pole with
an open lattice cross arm and that they were attempting to make the pole as aesthetic
as possible. He stated that the whips would be the only elements visible above the
tops of the trees.
Jetf Bowen commented that this site is located within an area that receives substantial
snowslide remains.
Shelly Mello inquired whether the equipment building would be back behind the water
tower.
Larry Storms responded that the equipment building would be 50 to 100 feel between
the pole and the building.
Ron Adepoe with US West stated that the western portion of this site slopes downward
and that access to this area would be orimitive.
Krislan Pritz stated that the neighbors wanted to be kept informed of the progression of
this proposal and inquired what the next step would be.
Rich Phelps stated that there would be a formal opportunity for public comments aft€r
an internal review and that the Town would be notified of any decision relaiing to this
proposal.
Kristan Pritz inquired whether this site was outside of the Town of Vail's boundaries.
Rich Phelps responded that the site was located outside ihe Town boundaries.
Larry Storms added that the road may be subject to Design Review Board review.
Dalton Williams inquired when the cellular lelephone site would be in place.
Planning and Environmenlal Commission
May 10, 1993
II
t.
I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMqRANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development
May 10, 1993
A request for a work sesslon for a major amendment to SDD #5 to allow for
the development of the remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas,
located at 1100 North Frontage Road and described as follows:
That pan of the Firsl Supplemental Map lor Simba Run Condominium, according lo th€ map
thereol recorded in the otlice of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and R€corder, described as
tollonts:
Beginning at the lrlost southwesterly corner ol said map, thence lhe lollowing lhre€ courses along
lhe wesrerly lines o{ said map; 1) NO3"33'01"E 160.79 te€l; 2) N12o50'33"E 144.72leet;3',1
N17'56'03'70.60 feet; thence, departing said westerly line, 513o16'03"W 157.26 leet, thgnce
S76o43'57"E 91.50 ieet; lhence N 13'1 6'03"E 35.00 ie€t; th€nce S76o43'57"E 72.31 feel to lhe
€asterly line ot said map; thence the lollowing two @urses along the easterly and south€aslsrly
lfnes of said map; 1) s24'44'57"E 52.38feet; 2) S52"50'29"W 272.50 leet to ths Point ot
Beginning, containing 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
That part of Simba Run, according to the map thereol, recorded in Book 312 at Page 763 in the
Office of lhe Eagle Counly, Colofado, Clerk and Recorder, described as tollows:
Beginning at the most sornherly corner ol said Simba Run, lhence the lollowing four courses along
the southwesterly and northwesterly lines of said Simba Run; 1) N37"09'31"W 233.28 teel; 2)
334.57 leel along the arc ol a curue to the lett, having a radius ol 1771.95 feet, a central angle ol
10"49'06", and a chord thal bears N42"13'20"E 334.07 leel; 3) N36"48'48" E 201.36 leel; 4) 15.96
leel along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 428.02 fEEl, a cenlral angl€ of
02'08'12", and a chord that bears N37o52'54" E 15.96 feet 10 a corner on the weslerly boundary ol
the First Supplemental Map lor Simba Run Condominium, according lo the map thereol recorded in
the ofiice ot the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder; thence lhe lollowing lour courses
along said westerly boundary; 1) S21'51'28"W 69.90 feel; 2) S17"56'03"W 181.17 teel;3)
512"50'33"W 144.72 teel,4) S03'33'01"w 160.79 feet to lho southeaslerly line of said Simba Run;
thence, along said southsasterly line, S52"5029"W 113.08 teel to the Point of Beginning,
conlaining 1.560 acres, more or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Simba Land CorporationMalid Said
Mike Mollica
I. PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The property owner and applicant, Simba Land Corporation, is requesting a work session with
the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) to review a proposed development plan
for the remaining phase ol Special Development District #5 (Simba RunA/ail Run). The
property is located at 'l 100 North Frontage Road and is bounded by the Timber Ridge
Apartments to the west, the North Frontage Road and Interstate 70 to the south, Phase I of
t
fI
Simba Run to the east and Lionsridge Loop Fload to the north.
Ordinance #6, Series of 1976, originally established SDD #5 and set the parameters for the
devefopment of the Vail Run Building. Ordinance #29, Series ot 1977, amended SDD #5.
This amendment expanded the SDD with the addition of 6.3 acres immediately to the west of
Vail Run and in addition, divided the SDD into what is now known as Development Area A
(Vail Run) and Development Area B (Simba Run). The development standards for both areas
were specifically stipulated in this ordinance. SDD #5 was further modified by the passage of
Ordinance #33, Series ot 1978, and Ordinanee #24, Series ol 1986.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE BEQUEST
The proposed development plan for the final phase of Development Area B, in SDD #5,
consists of twenty condominiums and four deed-restricted employee housing units. The
development plan calls for one four-unit townhouse building to be located on the southern
portion of the property, with access immediately off 0f the North Frontage Road. The
northern development of the property would take access from Lionsridge Loop and would
consist of four four-unit condominium buildings and one four-unit employee housing building.
Three curb cuts are proposed off of Lionsridge Loop.
On the northern bench of this site, each condominium is proposed to have a one-car garage,
and on the lower, or southern part ot this site, each condominium would have a two-car
garage.
This final phase ol the SDD will be part of the existing Simba Run Condominium Association,
and as such, will have access to all of the existing recreational amenities located in the
existing Simba Run project. These recreational amenities include three ouldoor tennis courts,
two ncquetball courts and one indoor swimming pool. Vail Run has its own outdoor
swimming pool and two indoor tennis courts.
The proposed phasing plan is included on the attached site plan, sheet No. 3a.
This project site is located within a high severity rockfall-geologic hazard zone. The
applicant's consulting geologist, Nicholas Lampiris, has completed a geologic investigation for
the property. The study is dated April 18, 1993 and is attached to this memorandum.
I
q
i
ilr.ZONING ANALYSIS
Listed below is the zoning analysis for
includes the two existing Simba Run buildings):
APPROVED DEV.PHASE I PHASE II
DEV. AREA B
1,6 rcras
20' - all perlmeter
property llnes
28 . 43',
33,422 aq. tl.
2.570 sc. ft.
36,000 sq. ll.
24
4
19,105 sq. ft.
52,596 sq. fl.
24 enclosed
27 surface
.0.
,located in SDD #5 (Phase I
TOTAL
DEV. AREA B
6.3 acreg
N/A
N/A
124,22S sq. tl.
7.179 sq. tt.
131,408 sq. ft.
119
10
84,194 sq. ft. (30-r/o)
t 68,898 sq. ft. (61.57")
15? enclosed (82ol")
33 surlace
185
gTANDAFDS DEV. AREA B
a.s *,nf z?4 48 f 4.7 acresSte Area:
Setbacks:
Height:
GRFA:
Units:
Employee
Dwelling
Unils:
Site
Coverage:
LanGcaping:
Parking:
Commercial
Area:
20' - all perimeter
proPerty lines
45'
129,000 sq. tt. - DU's
10.000 so. fi. - EHU's
139,000 sq. tl.
139
t0 (min.)
94sE
20el. (max.)
6trl. (min.)
85o/o enclosed (min.)
20 - all perimeter
properly lines
20 - 60'
90,807 Eq. ft.
4.601 sq. ft.
95,408 sq. ft.
95
29.7 la
65,089 sq. tt.
1 16,302 sq. ft.
1 28 enclosed
6 surlace
-0--u-
t
t
iIV. CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING THIS PFOPOSAL
As stated in the zoning code, the purpose ol special development districts is to:
"The purpose ol the special development district is to encourage flexibility and
creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate
use; to improve the design character and quality of new development within the
lown; to tacilitate lhe adequate and economical provision ot streets and utilities;
to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to lurther
the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
An approved development plan for a special development district, in coniunction
with a property's underlying zone district, shall establish the requirements for
guiding development and uses of property included in the special development
district."
Although the statf will not specifically address each of the nine SDD review criteria at this
worksession, the criteria are listed below:
A. Deslgn compatlbility and sensitivity to the immedlate envlronment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to archlteclural design,
scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, vlsual
Integrity and orlentation.
B. Uses, activity and density whlch provlde a compalible, efflcient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
G.
Compllance wlth parklng and loading requiremenls as outlined ln Chapter
18.52.
Conformity with applicable elements of the Vall Comprehensive Plan,
Town pollcies and Urban Design Plans.
ldentificatlon and mitigatlon of natural and/or geologlc hazards that affect
the property on which the special development dlstrict ls proposed.
Site plan, bullding design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensltive
to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the
community.
A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians
addressing on and off-site traffic circulation.
Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space In order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreatlon, views and lunctions.
c.
D.
E.
F.
H.
l. Phaslng plan or subdlvlsion plan that will maintain a workable, functlonal
and efllclent relatlonshlp throughout lhe development of the speclal
development district.
V. RELATED POLICIES IN THE TOWN OF VAIL LAND USE PLAN
A. The Town of Vail Land Use Plan identilies this area as High Density Residential
(HDR). High Density Residential is defined in the Land Use Plan as follows:
"The housing in this category would typically
consist of multi-floored structures with densities
exceeding fifteen dwelling units per buildable acre.
Other activities in this category would include
private recreational facilities, and private parking
facilities and institutional/public uses such as
churches, fire stalions and parks and open space
facilities."
The proposed plan for the final phase of Simba Run would set the overall
densiiy for Development Area B at 18.9 dwelling units/acre.
B. The following are the applicable Land Use Plan goals and policies which relate
to this proposal;
Goal 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment,
maintaining a balance between resideniial, commercial and
recreational uses to serve both the visitor and permanent
resident.
Goal 1.12 Vail should accommodate most ol the additional growth in
existing developed areas (infill areas).
Goal 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to oc6ur primarily in
existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where
high hazards do not exisl.
Goal5,3 Alfordable employee housing should be made available through
private etforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the
Town of Vail, wilh appropriale restrictions.
Goal 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the market place
demands for a tull range of housing types.
Goal 5.5 The exisling employee housing base should be preserved and
upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be
accommodated at varied siles throughout the community.
I
VI. DISCUSSION ISSUES
Since this is a worksession, there is no formal stalf recommendation at this time. However'
tne Satf has identilied the following issues, which we would like to discuss lurther with the
PEC:
A.
B.
Access to the lower bench of this site, to the tour'townhouse-type" units, is proposed
via a curb cut ofl of the North Frontage Road. Access to the units on the northern or
upper bench of this site is designed as a series ol three curb cuts off ol Lionsridge
Loop.
Does the PEC leel that the proposed access points to the site are reasonable?
Consideration should be given to reducing the number of proposed curb cuts. lt
appears to staff as though excessive backing and maneuvering may be necessary lo
turn vehicles around on the lower portion of this site. lt also appears that vehicles
exiting the northern bench of this site may need to back oui onto Lionsridge Loop-
Future Simba UnderDass.
As discussed in the recently adopted Vail Transportation Master Plan, the construction
of an l-70 underpass in the vicinity ot Simba Run, is proposed as a lirst priority
recommendation for both the West Vail interchange and the Main Vail interchange
improvements. The underpass would be constructed immediately opposite the
proposed curb cut for the lower bench development. To accommodate the underpass'
it would be necessary to lower the North Frontage Road approximately 13 to 15 feet in
this area. The appliiant has submitted a regrading plan, labeled as Sheet 38, which
indicates the regiiiOing which would be necessary to accommodate the future l-70
underpass. lt a-ppeari that the applicant's proposed design would not be in conflict
with the proposed underPass.
Architecture.
Although lower in height, and not as massive as the existing two buildings in Phase I
ol Simba Flun, the proposed architecture for this Phase ll development carries a similar
style and character of that of Phase l.
The existing bike path would need to be relocated as a resull of this proposal. The
bike path viould be relocated so that it would be entirely within the CDOT right-of-way'
ls thib new alignment acceplable to the PEC? A detailed landscaping plan will be
required before final PEC review. This planting plan should provide heavy screen
plantings between the bike path and the townhomes.
D.
E.Phasiho Plan (i.e. emoloyee housinq).
Sheet 3A indicates the proposed phasing plan for Phase ll of Simba Run. The staff
would like to point out that the employee housing building would be constructed as a
part of Phase lllB. This means lhat twelve dwelling units would be construcled prior to
the intiation of construction of the employee building, leaving eight units left io be built
after the employee housing is completed. ls this phasing plan acceptable to the PEC?
Staff suggests that after the first twelve units are built, the employee units would be
required to be constructed as the next phase. TCO on the linal eight units would not
be released until the employee units received TCO's.
Zoninq lssues.
Please see page 3 ol this memorandum to review the development statistics for the
project. As currently proposed, it appears that the project would not meet the minimum
standads for the following zoning categories:
.site coverage
.parking (enclosed)
.parking (in 20' setback)
Are these variations from the Town's zoning standards acceptable to the PEC?
Trash Eacilitv.
There is no trash facility designated on the site plan al this time. However, the
applicant has agreed to modify the plan and to add trash facilities for both the upper
and lower development areas.
Pedestrian Access to Pick-Uo/Drop-Off Af-ea For The Simba Shuttle Service.
Should a pedestrian walkway be provided from the proposed project lo the shuttle pick-
up/drop-off area?
Hazard Mitioation
Per the Nick Lampiris letter dated April 18, 1993, it appears that the mitigation will
have impacts on the site. Staff would like to see the design lor the mitigation
addressed as soon as possible as it will eflect site planning, archilecture, landscaping,
and possibly tratfic circulation.
F.
G.
H.
.",
Nlcholas Lampiris, Fh.D.
@NSULNNG GEOLOGIST
Ol8Ii INGERSOLL ljNE
srLT. COLORADO 8r&52
@t 878.'1& e1 HOURS)
Apr:{ l lG} r { ctC)l
.9al I y Frai neFd :
l'lortc"r Arshi tects
145 EaEt Heador.r Drive
ErDesroadE at ValIVail, C0 81657
f{E: Savoy Vi I I as
Dear
f have rerviewed tlre site of the re.fer-enced project as shonn onthe gcc*mpanying rn*p {or purposesi o{ Sock Fall rre.rierr {or' the'lotrn o.f Vail. The northern fonr Llnitffiigh
Rocl';'f aII Tone drre to the outcropping o{ ssndstone crn the othersid$ o{ thB Linn's Ridge l-oop. l'htE secrnd tier of lrnits is notirr the ha:+rrcl !one"
This is in a location wtrere the ridgeo containinq the sorrrctl or:pot*nti*l {aI}inE rnekEi, i$ Bt a lorq level r,riti-r respert-l;o thesi t-t;s Lnr l:. r'*cks c:irn reach t"tre northql nr.o J te6. 'I'lr e rnck::, r.,r i L l
h;r.,re ,rigr-ri licant en*rqy so that mitt:eat j,on r,riLI l,g1 necessnrv.
l'1a:r1. ;1nsL*hlr.r f-ochs clccut :abnvr: tfrTe prnposed deridT;FTffiElijttlre L",cr:p 'i-o;rcl wi I I catch gome fl.fi t-hern. . Thel hazard i ncrea=:es tclthe wE,st r+here the ridqe becomes higherr' therehy inrparting n,cre.lrinetic enerqy to potential falling rocks.
lr I prnpose several alternatives to eurbrs{:antially minimize the
haze.rd {rom {a1.1 inq:,eeq1.r...,. A {oq_.._l_oqt-l1igh berm nrey=be . ..
t,hich can beof thege {our
cong"tr''lrgted aitonq .Lfre Eouth ffi e *i tes..y nclt be a ause-it may nterfere $,e roadright of rt*'y. Anothei- step 'taken ib to dnsicln tlre{north side) of each=units tc|a Etrenuth of
oLrndS €nr Squere .foot f or a eagt f our 'feet ahove
n i::laetL qrado.I
re-i5-a.hst rocke canrroE-E nci-ri L eng!.neer rnay. €iuEEJest- -err-,energy abeortring .{"acing surch aalogs tr: protect thn brittle consrete.-.l[]g$ to protect th$ brittle consret€:-:,.. If posgiible. bot esgdggl-gns Eholrltl be u'tili'eedo especially +qq_lhg-14eElern tr{o urnits.Lln l E,E .
[.e,nt hioh witl'r. the sarna strenEth glven aHove. This wa]. 1 couldah:;r: lf,F o'[ urell p]acerl large (3 {oot) bourders. Berause of th'enat.ure of tho ha=ard and the options {or mitigrrtlon, I sLrggesf.thart {in;rl plans be revieuled by your enEinper'a,nd me TEFGIIF
eotecr|n t cal ontr€ the iE nave tleen choFen.
,r,
I
construction. o{ these unitg'oF annot increase the haaErd to nther
s':o+-wayr' br"ri ldinqs, r
eti or .f anre r{liestions please contact men
rm ttFed mlti ti on
or 6truCtur
reet:5 easement, E,'
e$pecr a utri ng your-
+Th
frr l
tCr
Ltt
prul t mi nsry conceprtuaL iaations"
I
$F
uI
i'
I
I
t
j
il
s
zz
cd
9r,
EbrF .-E
t{
0
{
0
d
d
J{
1
I
t
0
.l
d
t
.d
0
I(r
t/
/
I
i
IL
I
I
I
SAVOY VILLAS
S.D.D. #5 AMENDMENT ZONING ANALYSIS
Information aboul Original S.D.D. taken from Chapler 18.48, Special Development District 5, and subsequent do
ISSUE ORIGINAL S,D.D. AMENDED S.D.D.
# OF UNITS PHASE I 94
(INCLUDES PHASE II 40
94
24
118EMPL. UNTTS) TOTAL 134 *"
GRFA PHASEf 89,535 89,535 w
PHASE tl 38.327 96.000 2
TOTAL 127,862"125,535
EMPLOYEE PHASEI 6 4"UN]TS PHASE II 2 4TOTAL 8
MAX. HT.45 FEET 42 FEET
SETBACKS 20 FEET FROM PERIMETER
PROPERW LINE
20 FEET FROM PERIMETER
PROPERW L]NE
DISTANCE
BETW. BLGS.
As indicated on Developmenl
Plan
BLDG. BULK As indicaled on Devel. Plan.
SITE
COVERAGE
58,049 SQUARE FEET
(21.15 Vo)
61,858 SQUARE FEET
(22.54 a/o)
PARKING PHASE I 127 COVERED6 UNCOVERED
PHASE II 28 COVERED22 UNCOVERED 24 UNCOVERED
TOTAL . 155 COVERED ,151 COVERED28 UNCOVERED 30 UNCOVERED
183 TOTAL 18I TOTAL
127 COVERED6 UNCOVERED24 COVERED
RECREATIONAL
AMENITIES TAX
Not 10 exceed $.75 per sq. ft., and paid in conjunction with phases,
prior to building permit.
SPECIAL
PROVISIONS
Efficient Fireplaces
Drainage plan shall prevenl pollution from surface runoff.
Provide energy and water conservalion as technology exists.
RECREATIONAL
AMENITIES
5 Tennis Courts
Town fund contribulion of $10,000
Bike path from East to West
$wimming Pool
ADDITIONAL
AMENITIES
Provide Transportation to Village
Provide Town bus shelter
* Agreement daled 22 November, 1985, between the Town of Vail and Simba
Run Associates states that "Simba, or its successors or assigns, may move the
Employee units lo other locations on lhe Properly as long as such new
employee units are substantially the same type and square footage as the
Employee Units, and the number of such units is not reduced.'
**Ordinance 29 of 1977
SAVOY VILLAS
S.D.D. #5 AMENDMENT APPLICATION
INTRODUCTION
The original Special Development District 5 consisted of two phases. The first
was for the two existing Simba Run buildings, with their parking structure and
recreational amenities. The second phase consisted of one more large building
containing 40 condominium units, of the same design as the existing Simba Run
buildings, This phase was never built.
The proposed amendment, the Savoy Villas, is for a cluster of 20 condominiums
and 4 deed-restriced employee housing units, to be built in place of the original
Phase Two building of 40 units. The units are divided into 6 buildings of 4
condominiums each. They will maintain some of the architectural character of
Simba Run, but they will step the scale of the buitdings down and provide a
softer termination to the project than the originally proposed 4O-unit building.
DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Uses. All buildings are to be used for residential units. On the Northern,
or upper bench of ihe site. 4 similar buildings of 4 condominiums each are
proposed. Each condominium will contain a one car garage. On the
Eastern end of the upper bench, a building containing 4 deed-restricted
employee housing units are proposed. The lowest level of this building
will contain an office of approximately 1,200 square feet, which is to be
used exclusively for the management of the properties within the Special
Development District. On the lower part of the site is a building
containing 4 townhomes with two car garages. The new buildings will be
part of the existing Simba Run Condominium Association, and will have
access to their recreational amenities.
B. Desiqn compatibilitv. The parcel lies between the buildings of Simba Run
and Timber Ridge, two multifamily projects. The scale of the Timber
Ridge project is significantly smaller than that of Simba Run. The Savoy
Villas will provide a transition in scale between the two. Their primary
identity, however, will come from Simba Run, and they must create an
appropriate termination of that project. The Savoy Villas will continue, but
soften, the architecture of the Simba Run project. The individual buildings
begin on the East with the employee unit building which will be of
approximately the same height as the Western end of the Simba Run
c.
D.
E.
F.
building. The buildings then step down the hill, away from Simba Run,
and counter-clockwise around the site to the level of the North Frontage
Road.
Compliance with Parkinq and Loadinq Reouirements. The Savoy Villas
satisfy both the requirements for a stand-alone project, and the parking
ratios imposed by the original SDD. 24 covered spaces and 24 outdoor
spaces are provided. See the attached zoning analysis for requirements.
Conformitv with applicable Town plans and policies. The proposed
amendmenl is in keeping with the general land use plans of the Town of
Vail, which assume high- and medium-density residential development in
the immediate area.
ldentification and mitiqation of natural hazards. The Savoy Villas parcel
is located partially in medium- and high-density rockfall hazard zones.
Geologists are currently producing hazard reports and mitigation
recommendations, which will be incorporated to the site and architectural
design.
Site plan desiqned to oroduce a functional develooment. The site plan for
the Savoy Villas indicates two accesses to the parcel. One driveway is to
enter from Lions Ridge Loop, above the site, and serve the upper bench
of buildings. The other enters from the North Frontage Road, and serves
the 4 townhome units on the lower part of the site. Due to the steepness
of the site, it was desirable to provide 2 separate access points in order to
reduce the amount of paving and site disturbance needed.
Landscapinq and Open Space Due to a 4O-foot utility easement across
the South of the site, a large landscaping buffer has been created
between the buildings and the North Frontage Road. The easement will
be heavily planted, and the existing bike path will be relocated slightly to
ensure safety at the driveway crossing. The remainder of the site will be
provided with naturalturf, with planting accents at allentries, and buffers
between the roads, drives, and buildings.
RECREATIONAL AMENITIES
The Savoy Villas will have access to the existing Simba Run recreational
amenities, as provided in the original SDD. These facilities include 5 tennis
courts, bike path, swimming pool, and a contribution of $10,000 to the Town of
Vail.
G.
441 |,1,1 1'.:,4{ ri- ..|n7
,rr1rNNl: t l ti t{ t.Ltlrtt
rl,ttt.,
l;1/il | /ll0 l6t Ot
EnrL[: couNTv cLERt(.
Fntorl
coLonnDo
Rrc
s. oo
l .|.rr.tloi drlv rnxlr.a rl rrl.tl{ r|ri? d lf vltarr d lta lI| af tta
ll..?.ffi..'. ii!flrbtliltftrS(A't f||l r flrrl tha xla'rrtt.f t}| llrrl fa.tr ,ar na li aarlarall.l
r ar r.t |ri &|' .rr|nll|d d lrtl si? rl b ylthr a, tii l.I.
of rrri trno .t CE(FIA 'rf ri. fl.ar t*r. rt
,mt tx{D oRloRxtlcflr.l F8lnffn qm|olal
drr lrn rr rtrt l ifrr tD,B Fll
mFElllET
IJ' itr||l anl||li .|tltarrlr|l|a A hrl .d q
NE|nb.r'27r,1t90" :. . .tata't6. t, !t., l @EtrA ornFnAIIcN
/3 -,e6. ?*l3lal xrl.
trilddt rl
''f,''.lx!t
d
a aalFaallrt.
1r$1V.1306w rn5061
fcn r.. tat an 0'lr $||arw octD.c..F .alr 1r cotl|.]16
$rIt
rr4BBEl F-844 F*676
;HNNE]'TE PHILLIF.S
Dealaratlon.
E.venturar
Ind.
r.LrE lf;lr H!f{}4
-') l I
Lele7lsB tElls FE t OF 6
EAGLE FOUNTY CLERR, EoLORADO
EWlgreN
!
4€.F €|34?
%,,
REC
38. rao
A.
1d
8, 1983t Blmbh'Run AssoaiateE tr-li.t
the eurvlving Jointof Slnba Run Agsoelates,
'''...
I
L
,... ... \
'(1 .,',i'ti.lrJ
r'',!
?18o
. THrs DEcrr{RATroil'vAcArr}lc Al{ BA$BMENT, GRMITTNG ArrDCREATTNG A PERPETUAIJ ExclJusrvE EA$EMENT, A llot{-rxcr.,usrveEASEI.!ENf, eNp + TEI'IFOnARY CONSTRUCTIoN i:ASEI,TENT IuEasenentDecla-ratlonrf) ie rrade and entered lnto ae oi the'2rEt day ofIgl:Ilgrl-l!!9r.fr rnqITrD..rMERrcAlr pRopERrrEs, rro. i, rNc., aGeorgra corporatlon, herelnafter called . tjDEcLARANTil .., ., ..:. .-
., '' ', i:':'] &EcITAls
:
i
.c! Under the.provleigpe of, paragraBh a.t of thecnndonlntr'$ heq1.a.l:rt!in,
_ rntLL nrr cf t$e ienei*rni*rii, ar:ch,.dLngthe. Enptoyee Hou€l-ng unite, have been';;v;y;d-ily pectarant rotntt ial - purchas ers, - Decl arint-reserves the -'risrrti nith""i--inii-approvat of any other owner or Mortsasee to esdifrriir,l-ii"itI,and rerocated EasenEntg. itei.--are-crlrrently /a - condomintuns,gT:llglTE- thg Epnloyee nousing unfis, -wr,riiri-iaff not beenconveyedl by Declarant to inttial purchaserg.
D. Pursuant, to the provlslons of paragraph 12.I of thecondornl.nlurn Declaration, _ari righrs reserved to tlie-uiEri;d{-lnures to any succeEsor'fn inleilst of t[i-oeciaifit]=*'*"""
. Declarant, by AEreenent,, aEts the successoE ln lntereEt
executed a suFpLE!{ENT trq COHpOUirirruu-uicr,Aii"lrr-oil' non srMBA RUN.( rf supql.e$ental Declaratlonrr ) whdch suppr-nenirr_' Uliiuiiti;" ;;[racordad Novernber ?f t9B3 lir noon 3?a-et.p;g.-ieb of th6 recorda:f.,gg-!lerj5-1nd R.esotrder.of, the county oi-fiigii, state of\...i,sA.|\ errl.{ srr{rsEq.et gtr EnB COUnt'y Of SA91e|, gtAtg Of
:fl:"11l?.*j$:f."tlp.pT?yr"tone of sai&. s"ppied;tar peciaratton.the. real property ""a' rrqpiil;;;";; il""ti^iEi;Ei[il;il";%H;ii:fiin tha Supplomental Decliration was submirfart rrt ftra .r,r*A,+n.tr.r..-ln tha Supplomen Dgclaratlon waE subnlttedl to the condonrdlum
P. 133
.,,. (lr r,r,
"F-i"ti'"poc
:|a.60
I
-d- 9-9E TUE
4408e1 B-$4r+ F-876
1?:18 AtrARI f 1., +Ei5 13E|'li'
o
FBEOF6Le/e7 l9q lE: tE
' F. Pursuant to the rlghts regerlred to tha Declarant ln.
the condonlniur Dealaratlon,.Declarant deslres to vacate'
-6;tab$.sh and relocate certi|n easenents nore fully dEgcribed'herelnafter.
NOI{ TIIEREFORE, DeClarant doee hereby pUbllgh apd declare : '- -
that certaln easanentar. herelnafter deEerlbed' estabilshed_by
. virtuE of the Condoalniun DecLaratlon atE to be vacated and
c"ii"in easements, treietn"fter deecrlbed, are to be est-abllehed
Fursuant to thE piovlslone of the C.ondogl4tun Daclaratlon, Sueh
iacatlon of eaEeientg and establl.shment of eese[entE EheII bE
dleemed to rqn wlth thE land and shall 'be ,a burdan and a beneflt
to the Dcc!.arant, Lts succesgora and asslgns, and !o any owner
who has heretofoie acqulred or will hereaf,ter acqulre an- lntereet
tn the CondonlnlUfn ProJect, thelr grantees, succes6ors, heltra,
Eiacutors, aanfni"trai6rer=devleeei; leeseee and'aietgnees.
:l
b. ilBul.l4inqtr lhaff lilBan a etructure -oontalnlng . ,
condominiun unlts, resl6entlal aPartnent units and/or reslclenulal
hotel units together wlth connErcLal unltsr.all-or a portion of
whlch structurE la construeted on tbe Bulldlng SLte.
8.real eetatg deEsfButldttg ts
as of thg
attached hereto and rnade a
eontLEue'.lc 6nd adj ecent to
2.the Otlnere of, S
-$,1$9tr*-rhall, nean that Portlon oC tbe
Edtibtt 1, upon whlch a portlon of.a
ut ehall uean the owner of record,
GaX. estatE dcgcrlbed ln E*hiblt ep6rt hereof, whl"ch real estate ls
leal estnte-C.rearlbed tn Dxhlbl*- 1.
'd. .ttExhlblt I ReaI E-qlatert plrall nean
of the General Corililon Elaments owned by the ordnerg
Condonlnluhs descrlbed ln Exhlb{t 1.
that portionof Sfuuba Run
Ehe non-exclusLve easenent
Run Condomlniun UnLts lnrlght granted to
Paragraph 3.I of,the CondomlnLun DEclaratlon to uBe ancl enJoy
that portlon of,the General cormton Elenents located ttlthln thethaE porE]'on ol Ene senera.L uorunq
nulldinE site, ls herebY vacated.
-2-
,::;" .
?tgt .+ 6A €.S4?
44raES1 8-944 P-676
' 3,
.:i
_tt
. 6. Ensu4tpce.. The AdJacent Ohrner, l-te successors,
Eranteea, and asBLgnees, ehall obtaln and'ualntaLn comprehEnalvellablltty tnEurance, namlng hhe Associatlon a6 an lnsuied, ln anBrnount.eqgal to- the amount, of conprehengive llebiltty policyaalntatna{.by tue Aseocl.atl,on coverlng arl claLms toi }ereoiratlnJury. and/oi gtopgrty damage arlelng-oirt-oi-[[e ""cfuEi"e-G;,occupatlon, and enJolnrent of the Bulldtng SltE and the non-excluelve UEE and ocbupatlon of the othei Exhiblt r Real Estata.such.pollcy or pollclee,Bhall contaln a waLver of, subroqatlon anda tralver of, any defenEa based on lnvalidlty arislng frofr any actsof a nenber of the AEsoclation and shalr piovlce tEat the p6rtcynay not be cancelgd or auhEtan+-ralry rnodi.ltee uj.thaut at t-easr -
ten (Io) dayE prior written notlcs to all Lneureds
p.wner, Lta agents, andto enter uFon and haveaccesd !o the.Exhlblt I ReaI Fstate for the sxEreEs purpos€ of,perforning' con8trustLon wotdt on the sulldlns ol the rlnei,allatloh
of utlltty rLnee wlttrln tha Extrlblt 1 Reat rstate. The Adlacentowner, lts Euccegetor, grantees, and agELgnees ehalr be obriqated.to. repalr and replaci iny daamie done to-the Exhlblf 1 R;tt'Estate, lncludlng any vegetatlon thereon aF a reEuLt of, suchconEtruetion. such reilrporary Eagenent for constructlon elrarl
conrnencs upon the recordatlon of a Notice of conmeneement of
:
e-eE ruE 1": rscDAR
IE/e7l?b l8r L5 PB3OF6
Owner, itsexcluelve9ite.
be
perpetual
b{Ecl.srant Erants
owner, *ti p!"..sgor, grantees, anA agEtgnees "rtlfr f-J-olii;;ta;
P . l::r4
...
-3-
FE.E-
44gr8E1
9-9S TUE 1? : ?E A!AR IEo 468 6848
PgOPERTIES
theof
upon
the
{orth
O$ner8,
P. ti5
OF
flrst
ctlt
granted
by
Executed ae of
S8AtrE OF COLORLDO
COUI'TTV OF EAGLE
day and year,
DECIAN.AI{rI
UNI[ED'7
.. Byr
explres:
lb''1u '
-4-
?IEo
Exsuu
4+Ege1 B-844 F-6ZE Le/e7/3a lE:tE p6 E oF 6
!
;i ,,jrllg;.Easte couniv,-ciiriJi", Erili.Iif; .;l;;:;:,,'x",lli,lll'::
i.;i;i"-i."'l..'.li.i..;":..',j.,.,:'']...,'j''_-;-7
:' f;gtllil3"i:"tlf,.3i::,,:::lh:f:tirrv corngf"-or-sald ndp,; rhence,: ii' .i
., t, Ttr*t pari_ o,f; rr,i r,rr"I"_ t3!;ilulry.lr.-_E-l- for. , .srru* il j , ; l,: : li"ffHt"i""Ii.o:::::}r;l?:*:_il1, if;Jilo'.8-,"corcred in rhe orrree ;..
..'.. {rtryrqnrng ac cne nost southvcstirly cornet,..oi.sald ndp, thence ,: i.;' .i' she roltovrnq.rhrui "couiiii-;ii.d-iig-iiJElrrr rlqquiqr'iard-'urap; .:i ii;"f3?;3il'i;f .*ig:lt.-i:lii;llziiiiriEtiie;' 144.72 teeti. 3) i: ry+l3iioiuu--26.ei"iiJi, ;'If;.'ie.; l:fr#ffiii_f=dlo;l"t*"jii.i;"jj i' s13ot6r03ntl L!!.?_6 ,'r;;[,i r-i,i1.9.1: :.l5iii jg]-;e, !1.1g- reerilti"n"e ::.' .' lllloI6 | 03rrE -38..00 e gJii': iiie,.c'.;..igZe o.a3 r !,i.rrp ?A. tt . feeb.,ro Eh€ ::: : e*ct€rry trna gr.safa;yip;i'tiranag.thi. ioriiving trro csurse* athc easLerry..al{ .;utr,"Iit;i;-li.i;r- iE-Jiii ,rer u ,rnooor}fllH : , fi
468 €A42 E!6
l
e-sB TUE l7 : " ld0AR
U
?13o .169 6€42 F.l:1 |
:i.
,.;,..
8-544 F-674 l7leT/E@ 18:13 FB6T}F6
':
44AB?I
LEoAIJ DESCRIFETON
uap ghar;of recorded i$
Eabte countt, colorado,
aeglnnlng Rt tbe noEt. eoutharly corner gf eald Elnrba Ruil. theacs
th€ followlng fout gourEes Along.. tqq-^eouthwEst6r-1y - allcl
uorthwes terly linJs- I-t. r,ila-;imna nunl- f I NgZ o 09.' 3 I u er 433'.2s f 6et ;
il-li?-.E? -fdeE--aii"IE- friJ-ara i,t't-aurve- tq.l1e left, haulnE a
radLus 6t 777L.95 feet, a cetrttit Jngi" -o-f^ !!0.!9-'0{|, 11d-a clrord
l["ETe**s N42oij'Ao'ts 'gf C.0? feet; SJ tug-e oCt.'4-8:'E 201'36 feeet 4)
18,96 feer atoni'*r" it-J of a curv€_c9^!|9-.llght, havlnE a radlus
of 4eg.0e feet,'"'-ieni""t angle of 02008'13o., and a chord tfat
6I"r" -Nfio52;5{ng t5:ti6-i"et to-a'iorner on tha nesterlv boul{rY
if I[e-Fir"i s"psf eE-errGr ltap For slnba R'un condora{n{rrn'- acsording
;; "fh"'i'ii-t-t.Frii-i"Jral-{ tn ttrE off,tce-of tbe Eag1e countv,
CifoiuAo,--C#;-f -""i -n-a-cir6eri theage ; thg follgrtno fouf eourses
along sald westerly boundry-; 'ti's31o$at_x-8':$ 69.90 feect 3)
3ii;6e .b3nr{ rer ]ii-tler ; f }
-
srCo 60 t 33ul,l L44,7 2-f eet ;, 4 t 803 o 33' 01"w
160.?S feeb to -fit*-I""itre'estsrf,v Uo,^9f 91ld^tlnira Runi thonee,
iions-satA soutliiitEiiv'jtne, S5!o50r29"11 113.0S feeu to rhe Pol'nt
;fT';niii;"s, ;""ta-*."iiis t'660 acres. l.ore or legg'
1\
fl
I
-,tua'
LAND TITIJE GUARANTEE COMPANV
Representing old Republic National ?itle fnsurance Company
THANK YOU FOR YOTJR ORDER
April 20, L993
Our Order No. ! VZa928
BUYER/OWNER:
sIl'{BA LAND CORPORATTON, A COLORADO CORPORATTON
SELLER:
ADDRESS:
ADAR PROPERTTES, TNC.
(CALL FOR HER IO PICK UP}
11OO NORTH FRONTAGB RD. WEST
VAIL, CO 81657
Copies:1
Attn: SALLY BRAINERD Reference: 3 03 476-0344
PICKED UP FOR DELIVERY AM P},I
COVENANTS ATTACHED YES NO
FOR TITLE QUESTIONS CALL KAREN FLETCHER 3O3 476-225L
FOR CLOSING QUESTIONS CALL
| | | I il | | I | | I | | | I fr-g{ ; smn'*r-w"*,rs
li
tment To InsureCommi
lssued through tre Otfice ot
I-AND TITLE
GUARANTEE COMPANY
1Og S. Frontage Road W.
Suite 203
P.O. Box 357
Vail, CO 81658
(3031476-2251i FAX (303) 476-4534
€'
HOME OTfICE
3033 Eart First Ave.,suite 600
Denver, CO 80206
P. O. 8ox 5440
Denver. CO 80217
321-1880 I FAX 322-7603
ARAPAHOI
7700 E. Araoahoe Road
Englewood, cO 8011 |
ARVADA' 5440 Ward Road. #200
Arvada. CO 80002
420-0241 / FAX 423-1365
DRY CREEK
26 W. Dry Creek Circle, #390
Littleton, CO 80120
794-5307 / FAX 79&5802
. EAST
3300 5. Parker Rd., #105
Aurora, CO 80014
7514336
'
FAX 745-?669
ENGTEWOOD
6041 So. Syra(use Way. Suite 100
Englewood, CO 801 1 I
770-9596 I FA)< 290-9040
-
LAND TITLE
GUARANTEE
COMPANY
FIDDLERS GREEN
6400 S. Fiddlers Green Circle, #103
Enolewood, CO 801 I 1
771ifi9 I tAx 7714s26
HAMPDEN
8B2l E. Hampden, #100
Denver, CO 80231
750-4223 / FAX 369-6133
JEffERSON
710 Kipling, #202
Lakev"ood, CO 80215
232-3111 I rAX 238-2956
NORTH
9101 Harlan, #100
Westminster, CO 80030
427-9353 / FAX 430-1572
SOUTHWEST
3609 5. Wadsworth, #1 15
Lakewood, CO 80235
988-8550 / FAX 980-8324
YOSEMITE
3600 S. Yosemite, #25t
Denver, CO 80237
694-2837 / FAX 843-0402
EOUtDER
2425 Canyon Blvd., #234
Boulder, CO 80301
44+4101 / FAX 786-8423
CASTLE RO€K
512 Wilcox
Castle Rock, CO 80104
688-6363 / FAX 688-0143
COTORADO 5PRING5
102 5. Tejon, #100
Colorado Sprinqs, CO 80903
(719') 634-4821 / Direct 595-4113
FAX (719) 634-3190
DILLON
P. O. Box 4288
154 Dillon Mall, Suite 5
Dillon. CO 80435
(303) 262-1883 / FAX (303) 262-0390
GTENWOOD SPRINGs
817 Colorado Avenue, Suite 203
P. O. Box 2102
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
(303) 945-2610 / FAX (303) 9454744
PARKER
10841 5. Parker Rd., #l l0
Parker, CO 80134
84t-4900 / FAX (303) 841-1012
VAIL
'108 5. Frontage Rd. W
Suite 203
P. O. Box 357'
Vail, CO 8t 658
(303) 476-225r / FAX (303) 4764s34
AGENTS
BRECI(ENRIDGE
P. O. Box 2280
200 North Ridge
Breckenridqq CO 80424
4s3-22ss /FaX 453-6014
DURANGO. 1Zl1 Main Avenue
Durango. CO 81301
(303) 247-5860 / FAX (303) 247-9089
I
ALTA COMMIT}1 ENT
SCHEDULE A
our order No. v20928
For fnformation only
- Charges -
ALTA Owner PolicY
?ax Report $2o.oo
Info Binder $155.00
--TOTAL-- $17s.OO
****WITH YOUR REHITTANCE PLEASE REFER TO OT'R ORD"ER NO. V20928.*It**
1. Effective Date: April 13' 1993 at 8:00 A.M.
2. Policy to be issued, and proposed fnsured:
I|ALTATT ownerts Policy
198? Revision (Amended 1990)
Proposed rnsured:
SIMBA I-,,AND CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this Comrnitnent and covered herein is:
A Fee SirnPle
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
SIMBA I,AND CORPORATION, A COLORADO CORPORATION
5. The land referred to in this Conrtitment is described as
follows:
SIMBA RttN, ACCORDING rO THE PLAT RECORDED NOVEMEER 12, 1980 IN
BOOK 312 AT PAGE 763, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE Or COLORADO'
EXCEPT TIIOSE PORTIONS NOW PI,AITED AS SIMBA RUNS CONDOMINIWS BY
CoNDoMINIUM IUAPS RECORDED JANUARY 18, 1983 IN BOOK 352 AT PAGE
L55 AND SUPPLEMENT THERETO RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1933 IN BOOK
371 AT PAGE 527, COITNTV OF EAGI-,E' STATE OF COLORADO'
PAGE 1
o
ALTA COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE 8.1
(Requirernents) Our order No- V20928
The foltowing are the requirenents to be conplied with:
l_. Paynent to or for the account of the grantors or rnortgagors of
tha full consideration for the estate or interest to be
insured.
2. proper instrurnent(s) creating the estate or interest to be
insirred must be executed and duly fiLed for record, to-wit:
THIS COUilITI,IENT IS FOR INFORI.{ATION ONLY, AND NO PpLTCY WILL BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
THE COI'NTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE REQUIRES RETURN
ADDRESSES ON DOCUMENTS SENT FOR RECORDING! I
PAGE 2
ot
ALTA COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE B-2
(ExcePtions) Our Order No- V20928
The policy or policles to be issued will contain excepliong to the
follbwing-unLe3s the aane are disposed of to the satisfaction of
the conpany:
1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet.
6. Taxes and assessnents not yet due or payable and special
assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office'
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land.
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.{
g. RTGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REI'IOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SIIOULD THE SAME BE FOI'ND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
As RESERVED TN UNTTED STATES PATEN? RECORDED AU9USI 16, L9O9, IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 542 AND IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED DECEMbET 29, L92O, IN BOOK 93
AT PAGE 42.
10. RIGHT OF WAV FOR DIECHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STA?ES AS RESERVED TN UNTTED STATES PATENT RECORDED AUqIUSI 16, 1909'
IN BOOK 48, AT PAGE 542 AND RECORDED December 29 ' L92O, IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE
42,
11. RESTRICtrrVE COVENANTS, WHrCH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER
CLAUSE, BUT OUfTTfNG RESTRICTfONS, fF ANY' BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,
OR NATIONAL ORTGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRI'I"IENT RECORDED JUIY 25, 1969, IN
BOOK 215 AT PAGE 649 AND AS AI"IENDED IN INSTRT'MENT RECORDED DCCCMbCT 02'
Lg7O, IN BOOK 219 AT PAGE 235 AND AS AMENDED IN TNSTRWENT RECORDED June
08, L973. IN BOOK 229 L! PAGE 457.
].2. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED PLATS OF A RESUBDIVISION OT LION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION BLOCK C, AND
SII'IBA RftN.
13. EASEMENTS, RESERVATTONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SHOWN OR RESERVED ON THE
RECORDED CONDOI.IINIII,! MAP OF SIMBA RUN CONDOI'{INIUM AND SUPPLEMENT THERETO.
14. EASEMENT AGREEMENT AS CoNTATNED rN INSTRUI'{EN? RECORDED JULY 19' 1972 IN
BOOK 224 AT PAGE 824.
PAGE 3
SCHEDULE B-2
(Exceptions) our order No. V20928
15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVTSIONS OF ENCROACHMANT EASEMENT AGREEMENT
RECoRDED January 30, 1980 IN BOOK 298 AT PAGE 22.
16. UNDERGROUND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT AS GRANIED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC
ASSOCIATION,,INC. fN fNSTRUI,IENT RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1981 IN BOOK 33O AT
PAGE 655.
17. TJNDERGROUND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC
ASSOCIATTON, INC. IN INSTRTTUENT RECORDED OCTOBER 16, l-981 IN BOOK 330 AT
PAGE 657.
l-8. TERMS, coNDrrroNs AND pRovrsroNs oF GRANT oF EAsf,MENT AND MATNTENANCE
AGREEX.{ENT RECORDED February 07r 1983 IN BOOK 353 AT PAGE 212 AND RE-
RECORDED FEBRUARY 22f 1983 IN BOOK 353 AT PAGE 94L.
19. BURDENS, AFFECTING SUBJECT PROPERTY rF ANY, AS CONTAINED rN CONDOMINIITM
DECLARATION RECORDED JANUARY 18, 1983 IN BOOK 352 AT PAGE 154 AND AS
SUPPLEMENTED IN INSTRT]MENT RECORDED NOVEUBER 7, 1983 IN BOOK 372 AT PAGE
460.
20. TERMS, CoNDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLAR.ATTON VACATING AN EASE!4ENT,
GRANTTNG AI{D CREATTNG A PERPETUAT EXCIJUSTVE EASEMENT, A NON-EXCLUSIVE
EASEI|ENT, AND A T$IPOEARY CONSTRUCTTON EASET{ENT RECORDED December 27, L99O
IN BOOK 544 AT PAGE 676.
t
ALTA COMMITMENT
PAGE 4
LAND TLE GUARANTE COMPANY
DI SCLOSURE STATEIT{ENT
Required by Senate BiIl 9L-14
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing
district.
€
B) A certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction
rnay be obtained fron the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundarLes
of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County
Commissioners, the county Clerk and Recorder, or the County
Assessor.
Reguired by Senate Blll 92-L43 -
A) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurLsdiction
shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County
Treasurerts authorized agent.
t
I
'exodE tto. I eric Beringause
c/o 1st American Federal Savings - 1487 Shoreline Drive
S and J Operating Cornpany
P.O. Box 2249
Wichita Falls, TX 76307
Barry Watls
3516 Elm Creek Court
Fort Worth, TX 76109
P.O. Box 878
Fort Smith, M 72902
Stuart Brown
P.O. Box 2359
Vail, CO 81658
Wayzata, MN 55391
John Markel
102nd Dodge Street
Omaha, NE 68114
Joan Agee Comegys-Abernathy Company Telemark Townhouses
813 Mira Drive P.O. Box 757 1090 Vail View Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80906 Archer City, TX 76351 Vail, CO 81657
Vail Run Condo Association
1000 Lions Ridge Loop
Vail. CO 81657
5-5 -q3- oOToorrns $-rr ctrl € I \
slN4ea AOJACerurs
ti
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUB PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that lhe Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Seciion 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on May 24,1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for a work session:for the establishment of a Special Development District,
a CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to
View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B,
C, Block 2, Vail Village lst Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
2. A request to amend Section 18.04.170 of the Zoning Code to clarify the definition of
the height of structures.
Applicant: Town of Vail
Golden Peak House Condominium Asfpc./Vail Associates,
lnc./Partners, Ltd.iMargaritaville, Inc. =
Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin
Planner:Shelly Mello
3. A request to amend Section 18.58.020 of the Zoning Code lo clarify the height allowed
for retaining walls in setbacks.
Applicant: Town of Vail- Planner:Jim Curnutte
4, A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an outdoor dining deck located at
122 E. Meadow Drive, Village Center Commerclal Building/A part of Lot K, Block 5E,
Vail Village First Filing.
Applican[ Fred Hibbard
Planner: Shelly Mello
5. A request for a setback variance to allow an addition to Unit 3-A, Vail Trails ChaleVa
portion of Block 4, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: W. Patrick GrahmPlanner: Jim Curnutte
6. A request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 1linch high
pressure natural gas pipeline generally located between Dowd Junction and the Vail
Associates Shops.
Applicant:
Planner:
,i Applicant:
'' Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Public Service Company of Colorado
Russ Forrest
VailAssociales
Mike Mollica
Johann Mueller
Shelly Mello
Vail Associates
Jim Curnutte
Paul Raether
Jim Curnutte
Town of Vail
Jim Curnutte and Russ Forrest
i.
7, A request for a conditional use permit to allow the elimination of a dwelling unit in order
to allow the VailAssociates Real Estate Office to expand in the A & D Building, located
at 286 Bridge Streevlots A - D, Block 5A, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicanl:
Planner:
8. A request for a minor subdivision to vacale the lot line between Lots A-1 and A-2, a
request for variances from the subdivision road standards, wall height slandards, to
allow parking in the front setback and to allow a cantilevered portion of a building to* encroach into an area of land in excess of 40% slope at Lots A-1 and A-2, Block A,
Lions Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 1/1139 and 1109 Sandstgne Drive.
Michael Lauterbach/The Reinlorced Earth Co.
Shelly Mello
A request for a wall height variance for a property located at 3130 Booth Falls
CourULot 6, Block 2, VailVillage 1Zth Filing
o
10.A request for a conditional use to allow tee-pees to be used in conjunction with Vail
Associates summer programs to be located adjacent to the Base ol Chair 8, Tracts B
and D, Lionshead 1sl Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
11. - A request for a front setback variance, a wall height variance and a site coverage. variance to allow the construction ol a garage located at Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village
, 1st Filing/165 Forest Road.
12. A request for proposed text amendments to Chapter 18,38, Greenbelt and Natural
Open Space Dislrict, and Chapter 18.32 Agricultural and Open Space Dislrict, of the
Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant:
Planners:")
A requesl for an amendment to Chapter 18.54, Design Review, to modify the review
procedures for the Design Review Board.
13.
14.An appeal of a staff decision regarding GFIFA for a covered entryway to be constructed
as part of a residence located at Lot 1, Distelhorst Subdivision/4s8z Streamside Circle
East.
Appellant:
Planner:
Kyle Webb
Jim Curnutte
A one hour discussion of appointment of a PEC chairperson before project orientation.
A request for a major amendment h SDD #5 to allow for the development of the
remaining portion of the Sim,ba Flun SDD, Savoy Villae.. located at 1100 North Frontage
Road, more specifically described as follows: ..ii,
That pari of the First Supplemenlal Map for Simba Run Condominium, according lo the map thereof
recorded ln the ollice ol lhe Eagl€ County, Colorado, Clerk and Flecorder, described as lollows:
Beginning at the most southweslerly corner of said map, thence the following thre6 courses along the
we$erfy lines ol said map; 1) NO3"33'01"E 160.79 teer;2) N12'5033"e 144.72 feel;3) Nl7'56'03" 70.60
teel; thEnce, departing said weslerly line, S13016'03"W 157.26 teel, thencs 376"43'57"E 91.50 feel; thence
N13"16'03"E 35.00 teel; thence S76'43'57"E 72.31 teel to the easlerly line of said inap; lhence lhe tollowing
two courses along the east€rly and southeaslefly lines ot said map; 1) S24"44'57"E 52.38 feet;2)
S52o50'29"W 272.50 fget to thg Point ol Beglnning, conlaining 0.6134 acres, more or less; and
That pan of Simba Flun, according to the map lhereof, recorded in Book 312 at Pag€ 7e€ in the Ollice of
the EaglE County, Coh)rado, Clerk and Recorder, described as lollows:
Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Simba Flun, rhence the following four courses along the
southweslerly and -nonhwesterly lines of said Simba Hun; 1) N37o09'31"W 233.28 feet; 21 334.57 l6et along
the arc ol a curue to ths teft, having a rirdius of 1771.95 {eet, a cedral angle ol 10P49'06", and a chofd lhat
bears N42o13'20"E 334.07 feeu 3) N36648?8' E 201.36 leel;4) 15.96 teet along the arc of a curve 10 thg
right, having a radius ol 428.02leel, a central angl€ of 02"08'12'. and a chofd fiat bears N37"52'54' E
15.96 teel lo a corner on the westef ly boundary of lhg Firsl Supplemenral Map tor Simba Flun
Condominium. accarding to the map thereof recorded in thg oflice of thg Eagle County, Colorado, Cl€rk and
Fleeorder; thence lhe following tout courses along said westerly boundary; 1) S21o51'28"W 69.90 teet;2)
S17'56'03"W 18'1.17 feet; 3) 512o50'33"W 144.721eer:4) S03'33'01"W 160,79 teet to rhe souh€aslerly line
of said Simba Run; thence, along said souheasterly line, 552'50'291 / 113.08 feet to the Point of
Beginning, conlaining 1.560 acresr more or less.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Town of Vail
Jim Curnutle
Simba Land Corporationlwalid Said
Mike Mollica
Town of Vail
Andy Knudtsen
15.
16.
17.A request for a conditional use permit, a paving variance to allow for a gravel access
road and the cemetery master plan and management plan tor the proposed design of
the Vail Cemetery to be located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located
west of the Glen Lyon subdivision and southeast of the Matterhorn nelghborhood.
3
18. A. request for a modification to PEC conditions of approval for the revised development
plan for Vail PoinVl881 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 1, Block 3, Lionsridge Filing No.3.
Applicant: Steve GenslerPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
{,
4
/.-a,,pR0JECT: _\..4//0
DATE SlJSl'llTTED: I 27.? 3
C0I"u',rENTS }IEEDED BY:
BRIEF OESCR,TPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
INTtP.-gqPARTNENTAL REV r El,l
?t z-Lat S
OATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Da teReviened by:
Connents:
FI RE DEPP,RTI.iENT
Reviewed by:- /7/.'- c'686r-Date
/y7 r:1;"-,"-'-5 d-..,. 1<- /ubztc--/ E ,e-'< /-y'J"'-h t'
,&t.azr.'rz-zz// / f/U-- 2n4 -t 'z'"'z'ze'<-{ -
, ,E z-zJ "l j4 t',44""4 n; s'z'"'t'/'4':-81) '
--t*-''r1Conlents: t -,r r/ z- ta-''z-
''tlj?gr'
a7/an'nrt.-'
PoLICE 0EPARTI,IEIT
Revjer.red by:
Comnerrts:
Date
Revi:'red by:
Co;;ents:
,s
\*r8
Da te
L-
I
1.Simba Run Resort
ADAR Corporation
8777 Tallyho Road
Houston, TX 77061
Select Resorts
1100 North Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Timber Ridge Apartments
Mark lV Realty
400 North Franklin
Chicago, lL 60640
Vail Run Resort
.,Vail Run Ownership Association
1000 Lionsridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
Telemark Townhouses
Marika Brofus, president
Telemark Townhouses Association
1083 Lionsridge Loop
Vail, CO 81657
Casolar
Grag Hampston, President
1175 Casolar Del Norte Drive
Vail. CO 81657
5.
MoTUERARCHTTECTS
List of Neighboring Properties
SAVOY VILLAS
I
6. Snow Fox Condominiums
Snow Fox Owner's Association
c/o Crossroads Realty
Box 1292
Vail, CO 81658
7, Breakaway West
Breakaway West Association
Box 5940
Avon, CO 81620
Also: Sally Brainerd will hand deliver to resident manager
8. Colorado Department of Transportation
Box 298
Eagle, CO 81631
9. Lot G4, Lionsridge Filing 2
Stewart H. Brown
Box 2359
Vail. CO 81658
+lsa t1?od*cLrr\s s!-tt o-ffe \\
THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
'_, . ja .1,,'!' , .
PUBLIC NOTICE
1.A request for a joint work session with the Design Beview Board and the Planning and
Environmental Commission to review a request for a conditional use, a paving variance
3.nd tlte cemetery master plan and management plan for the proposed design of the ! *Vail Cemetery to be located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located ,,s_
west of the Glen Lyon subdivision and southeast of the Matterhorn neighborhood.
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Applicant:
Planner:
Town of Vail
Andy Knudlsen
Arno Brinkman
Tim Devlin
Anneliese Taylor
Shelly Mello
v
2.A request for a landscape variance to allow for the reconstruction of the parking area
at the first Bank/17 Vail Road/Lot 6, Vail Viilage 2nd Fiting.. ,
First Bank of Vail
Andy Knudlsen
3. A request for a conditional use to allow tee-pees to be used in conjunction with Vail
Associales summer programs to be located adjacent to the Base of Chair 8, Tract A,
Lionshead 1st Filing.
Applicant: Vail AssocialesPlanner: Jim Curnutte
A request for walf heilght variances to allow for the construction of a driveway to the
residence located at 2345 Cortina Lane/Lot 4, Block A, Vail Ridge.
Applicant:
Planner:
A request for setback and site coverage variances to allow for the construction of an
addition and a garage located at 2409 Chamonix Road/Lot 19, Btock A, Vail das
Schone Fiting No. 1.
4.
5.
6.A request for a front setback variance and a site coverage variance to allow the
construction of a garage located at Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Fiting/l65 Forest
Road.
1
Applicant:
Planner;
Applicant:
Planner:
' j'PaulRaetherl'
Jim Curnutte
-1 ), ' .--' '.
17. A request for a work session for a minor subdivision to vacate the lot line between Lots
,,, ',, A-1 and A-2: a reQuest for variances from the subdivision road standards; wall height
. .,, standards and to allow parking in the front setback at Lots Al and 42, Block A, Lions
Ridge SubdMsion Filing No. 1/1139 and 1109 Sandslone Drive.
Applicant:Michael Lauterbach/The Reinforced Earth Co.
,,, Planner: :' '.: - Shelly Mello ,
:...
A request for a work session for a maior amendment to SDD #5 to allow for the.. development of the remaining portion of the Simba Run SDD, Savoy Villas, located at
.. 1100 North Frontage Road.
Simba Land CorporationMalid Said {{Mike Mollica
A request for a work session to discuss proposed revisions to Chapter 18.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District, and Chapter 18.32 Agricultural and Open
Space District, of the Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant:
Planners:
Town of Vail
Jim Curnutte and Russ Forest
A request for a minor suMivision and a major amendment to SDD #4, Cascade
Village, to amend the development plan for the Waterford and Cornerstone parcels in
area A, described as follows:
ThEt pad ol lhs Sw rl4 NE 1/4, Socrion 1a Tswnship 5 Sourh, Rangs 8t wsst ot thssirlh PrhcipEt Moridtrn, Tovrn ot vall. Eaole
County, Colgradg. dgsctibed as tollovrs:
BsginnLE at a point on lh€ south€rly dghl.ot-wry lln€ ot lnt€rslare Highway No. 70 vyh.nce an iron ph wllh I phstie cap ms,king tho
canl€. of said S€dbn I a boar3 S 3ft'1 0l 9" W I 447.03 t€et: hsnc€ atsng €aid south€rly rlghr.of-way lino t$ro courses
rl N 52o5029. € 229.65 f€et
2) N 74"381r e r60.70 b€r;
thence dspafllno said southarly righl-ot-way lln6 N 88.455,F € 138.93 te€! th€nce S 40145'14' W 94.3? fe€f thsnce S lE t636' W
54.08 le€r; *t€nca S 0l?1'36'W 205.02 lseq fisnco S 12.0n36i' W 110.25 f€€t ltpncs S 28"2836- w 161.,19 fe€t: th€nce N 40
'"171x'W 2ll.rB t€et; fi€{lce N 4y42'56'E 97.80 f€et; |hanc€ N 3fog3t'W 95.59 t€€r; |hsnc€ S 5f5O?9'w 55.10 to6[ ftanca
69.48 te€t alot€ tho arc ot a non.Engenl clrv€ to lhs l€lt having a .6diui qt 65.00 te€t, a cefiral anole ol 61"1,0'42t' aod a chofd lhal
boars N 58' 5553 W 66.22 ts€l; t|€nc€ N 3f0931' W 118.50 fe.r To fhs True Polnr ol Beginnir€, Counry ot Eagle, Slals ol
Colorado:
9.
10.
Applicant:
Planner:
MECM Enterprises represented by Eustaqulo Cortina and
Commercial Federal Savings.
Shelly Mello
7 -\
11.
12.
Applicant:
Planner:
A request tor a conditional use to allow furniture sales at the Cascade Crossing
Building located at 1031 South Frontage Road WesVan unptatted parcel tocated west
of the Vail Associates maintenance shop.
Paul Anderson Collection, Lld.
Andy Knudtsen
Michael Lauterbach
Jim Curnutte
A request for a minor subdivision and an amendment to a previous PEC
recommendation for approval of a major amendment to Cascade Vilfage, SDD #4,
Area A. Millrace lll, 1335 Westhaven Drive, Cascade Village, more specilically
described as follows:
A pad ot fie SW v., NE %, Sedion r a Toiv{r5hip 5 Sritt, FalE9 et Wrst ol fie 6n P.M.. doscrib€d a6 tbttows:
B€glDnlng ar a poiint ot fie No.lh.So0th csdedin€ ot said Ssdion !e hence an fron pin yrl$ a plastic cap narkkD the cDnl€r ot said
sec,lioD 12 bea6 s00"38'5tvY 455.06 t€af, rhence along said csllBdho Noopgs 56'c t22.8'r tser lo ft€ 3Durhoiy Fow lin€ ol l-70;
mence depetting 8ad FOW Ine f'166"53?5'E 39.15 tssli $snc. d€F€rlirp sa'6 FOW line SBr.23'1S-E t65.42 leer |o. point ot
cuws: th€nco 12?.811 fset Eloog ths ars ql a 143.20 foot radius curva |o th€ left tlavinf{ cent|al aneL ol4SrOSSt' and r cho.d that
be8rs S15'57'45-E 'l19.lO Jcer: th€nce S4O3tt O'E 3.OO le€[ henc6 66.30 bgl clonC tha arc ot a 77.21 foor.adiug srrrve b $.
right. having a cenral angle ot 49"12'10'and a ciord rhat b€ars 915"X€tl5€ 6l€8 lseti thcrlcs SB"aOlO'trV 9O,2t leat ltlsnc€
N38'4?2if'W ?2,t.55 fo.q fienc. S78olO3l|.W 101.44 t€€t ro ite Poirr of 6€Oioni(r0.
Applicant:
Planner:
3
A P rofessicnal Corporation
143 East Meadow Dri'rc
Crossroads at Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
303/476 5105
MOnTeRARCHITECTS
Letter of Transmittal
Date:
To:
April21, 1993
Mike Mollica
T.O.V. Community Development
Savoy Villas
Proiect:
Please find enclosed the following:
Copies0aled of
Remarksl
1
1
1
1
4
Mike,
I Hope this does it.
Neighboring Property Owners List
Set of Addresses Envelopes
RocKall Hazard Analysis
Site Plan with Roof Elevations
Updated Topographic Survey
Complete Title Report
Let me know if there is anything else.
Sally Brainerd,
/,J
SAVOY VILLAS
S.D.D. #5 AMENDMENT APPLICATION
INTRODUCTION
The original Special Development District 5 consisted of two phases. The first
was for the two existing $imba Run buildings, with their parking structure and
recreational amenities. The second phase consisted of one more large building
containing 40 condominium units, of the same design as the existing Simba Run
buildings. This phase was never built.
The proposed amendment, the Savoy Villas, is for a cluster of 20 condominiums
and 4 deed-restriced employee housing units, to be built in place of the original
Phase Two building of 40 units. The units are divided into 6 buildings of 4
condominiums each. They will maintain some of the architectural character of
Simba Run, but they will step the scale of the buildings down and provide a
softer termination to the project than the originally proposed 4O-unit building.
DESIGN GRITERIA
9ses. All buildings are to be used for residential units. On the Northern,
or upper bench of the site. 4 similar buildings of 4 condominiums each are
proposed. Each condominium will contain a one car garage. On the
Eastem end of the upper bench, a building containing 4 deed-restricted
employee housing units are proposed. The lowest level of this building
will contain an office of approximately 1,200 squafe feet, which is to be
used exclusively for the management of the properties within the Special
Development District. On the lower part of the site is a building
containing 4 townhomes with two car garages. The new buildings will be
part of the existing Simba Run Condominium Association, and will have
access to their recreational amenities.
Desiqn comoatibilitv, The parcel lies between the buildings of Simba Run
and Timber Ridge, two multifamily projects. The scale of the Timber
Ridge project is significantly smaller than that of Simba Run. The Savoy
Villas will provide a transition in scale between the two. Their primary
identity, however, will come from Simba Run, and they must create an
appropriate termination of that project. The Savoy Villas will continue, but
soften, the architecture of the Simba Run project. The individual buildings
begin on the East with the employee unit building which will be of
approximately the same height as the Western end of the Simba Run
A.
B.
/J
c.
D,
E.
F.
building, The buildings then step down the hill, away from Simba Run,
and counter-clockwise around the site to the level of the North Frontage
Road.
Compliance with Parkinq and Loadino Requirements. The Savoy Villas
satisfy both the requirements for a stand-alone project, and the parking
ratios imposed by the original SDD. 24 covered spaces and 24 outdoor
spaces are provided. See the attached zoning analysis for requirements.
Conformitv with aoolicable Town olans and oolicies. The proposed
amendment is in keeping with the general land use plans of the Town of
Vail, which assume high- and medium-density residential development in
the immediate area.
ldentification and mitioation of natural hazards. The Savoy Villas pareel
is located partially in medium- and high-density rocl<fall hazard zones.
Geologists are currently producing hazard reports and mitigation
recommendations, which will be incorporated to the site and architectural
design.
Site plan desioned to produce a functional development. The site plan for
the Savoy Villas indicates two accesses to the parcel. One driveway is to
enter from Lions Ridge Loop, above the site, and serve the upper bench
of buildings. The other enters from the North Frontage Road, and serves
the 4 townhome units on the lower part of the site. Due to the steepness
of the site, it was desirable to provide 2 separate access points in order to
reduce the amount of paving and site disturbance needed.
Landscapinq and open Space Due to a 4O-foot utility easement across
the South of the site, a large landscaping buffer has been created
between the buildings and the North Frontage Road. The easement will
be heavily planted, and the existing bike path will be relocated slightly to
ensure safety at the driveway crossing. The remainder of the site will be
provided with natural turf, with planting accents at all entries, and buffers
between the roads, drives, and buildings.
RECREATIONAL AMENITIES
The Savoy Villas will have access to the existing Simba Run recreational
amenities, as provided in the original SDD. These facilities include 5 tennis
courts, bike path, swimming pool, and a contribution of $10,000 to the Town of
Vail.
G.
{It
SAVOY VILLAS
S.D.D. #5 AMENDMENT ZONING ANALYSIS
Information about Original S.D.D. taken from Chapler 18.48, Special Development District 5, and subsequent do
ORIGINAL S.D.D. AMENDED S.D.D.
# OF UNITS PHASE I 94 94
24
118
0NCLUDES PHASE tt 40
EMPL. UNTTS) TOTAL 134 *'
GRFA PHASE I 89,535 89,535
PHASE il 38.327 36.000TOTAL 127,862t* 125,535
EMPLOYEE PHASEI 6 4*UNITS PHASE II 2 4TOTAL 8
MAX. HT./I5 FEET 42 FEET
SETBACKS 20 FEET FROM PERIMETER 20 FEET FROM PERIMETER
PROPERW LINE PROPERTY LINE
DISTANCE
BETW. BLGS.
As indicaled on Development
Plan
BLDG. BULK As indicated on Devel. Plan.
SITE 58,049 SOUARE FEET 61,E58 SQUARE FEETcovERAGE (21.15 %) (22.540 \
PARKING PHASE I 127 COVERED 127 COVERED6 UNCOVERED 6 UNCOVERED
PHASE II 28 COVERED 24 COVERED22 UNCOVERED 24 UNCOVEREDTOTAL 155 COVERED 151 COVERED28 UNCOVERED 30 UNCOVERED
183 TOTAL 18,I TOTAL
RECREATIONAL Not to exceed $.75 per sq. ft., and paid in conjunction with phases,
AMENITIES TAX prior to building permit.
il
SPECIAL Efiicient FireplacesPROVISIONS Drainage plan shall prevent pollution from surface runoff.
Provide energy and waler conseryation as technology exists,
RECREATIONAL 5 Tennis CourtsAMENITIES Town fund contribution of $10,000
Bike path from East to Wesl
Swimming Pool
ADDITIONAL
AMENITIES
Provide Transportation to Village
Pmvide Town bus shelter
* Agreement dated 22 November, 1985, between the Town of Vail and Simba
Run Associates states that 'Simba, or its successors or assigns, may move the
Employee units to other locations on lhe Property as long as such new
employee units are substantially the same type and square footage as the
Employee Unils, and the number of such units is not reduced."
**Ordinance 29 of 1977
|.t:. -f , "--\'3 : revieed Lo/slgz
DA'E APPLrcArroN *.";*" ffib 4oar, ,r,
I
. APPI.ICtrlIOf, FOBU rOR SPECIII. DBUEIOPUENT
DISIRIC]r DEVEIOPTIENI PIAtr
I. This procedure is rgglrired for any project that woutd gothrough the Special Developmgnt Oislrict procedure
d, Vai:l , C0 81657
(303) 47e-0602
A, APPTICANT'S REPRESENTAT Archi tects
ADDRESs 143 E. Meadow Drive, Vail HqN6 476-5105
PROPERTY OV|NER(S) Simba Land rati on
otrNER(s' srcNtr sRE(S)
MAILING ADDRESS 11OO NOTth
D.
B. An environmental impact report shall be subnit.ted tothe zonj.ng administrator in accot'dance with Chapter18.56 hereof unless waived by Section 18.56.030, exemptproJects;
C, An open space and recreational plan sufficient to meeLthe demands generated by tbe develv!?nent without undueburden on avaiLable or proposed public facilities;
D. .. Existing contours having contour int.ervats of not, morethan five feet,if the average sJ.ope of the site-istvrenty percent or 1ess. or with contour intervals ofnot more than t,en feet if the aveiage slope of the siteis greater than twenty percent.
E, A proposed site plan, at a scale nqt smalLer than one": " inch-equal-s fifty feet. showing thd approxinatelocations and dimensions of all buildings andstructures, uses:itherein, and all principal. sitedevelopment featuries, sucX:as landscaped areas,
-.i , walkways, service entriesr' drivewaisr'and off:street', parking and loading-areas-wlth pioposed contours aftergrading and site development,.
Rd., Vai l , C0 81657
sOue 479-0602
F. A prelininary landscape plan, at a scale not smaller
than one inch equals fifty feet, showing existinglandscapefeaturestoberetainedorremoved,and
showing proposed landscaping and landscaped site
developmenL features, such as outdoor recreationalfacilltiesr' bicycle paths, trails, pedestrian plazas
. . ald walkwaysrr ltaleri features and other elementsi
IG. Preliminary building elevations, sections, and floorplansl at a scale not, smaller than one-eighth eguals
one foot, ln sufficient detail to determine floor arear'gross residential floor area, iriterlor circulation,locations of uses within buildings, and the general
scale and appearance of the proposed development.
{,
'a.
III. TIME REQUIREMENTS
A. The Planning and Environment.al Corunission meets on the
Znd and 4th Mondays of, each mont.h. An application withthe necessary accompanying mat.erial must be submitted. . four weeks prior to the dat,e of the meeting.
B. The developer must begin initial construction of tnespecial development dist.rict nithin Lhree years fromthe time of its final approval, and continue diligently' toward the cornpletion of the projecL. If the special
development district is to be developed in phases, the.... j:. developer mlrst begin construction'of subsequent phaseswithin one"year of the completion of the prevJ.ous
NOTE:
' :.'
IV. FSES l
.-_---.'.'epp)-icEtibn Fees are
. . ::. -
as foLlows:
cr.
b.
c.
Establishnent of SDD :
Ma jor Arnendnents:
Minor Amendments:
91,500.00
$1,000.00
$ 200.00
' local, State or Federal agency other than the Town ofVaiI, t,he application fee shall be increased by$200.00. Examples of such review, may include, but arenot, limited to: Colorado Department of Highway AccessPermits.r Army Corps of Engineers 404, et,c.
B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any
, pubJ-ishing fees whictr are in exqess ot,.50* of theapplication fee,;.', If, at the applicant,rs requestr dnvmatter is postponed for hearing, causing the mat.ter tobe re-published, t.hen, Lhe enUire fee for such re-publication shal.l be paid by the applicant
C. Applications deemed by the Comrnunity Development
Department to'have significant design, Land use or. other issues which may have a stgnificant impact on thecomrnunity may require review by consultant.s ot.her ttrattovrn staff. Should a determinat.ion be made by the town.staff that an outside consultant is needed to'revievfany application, Community Development may hire anoutside consultant, it^ shalL estimate the amount of
,,t ":1
t'
money neceasary to pay hin or her and this amount shalLbe forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the tinehe files his application witn tne- Corununity DevelopmentDepartment. Upon completion of the review-of theapplication by the consultant, any of the fundsforwarded by the applicant for payment of theconsult,ant which have not been paid to the eonsultantshall be returned to the applicint. Expenses incurredby lfe Town in excess of tirE amount forirarded by theap.plicant shalt Qe paid to the Town by the applicantwithin 30 days of nbt,ittcation by the-Town. --
PLEASE I.TAKE
TOWN OF VAIL
D EP.i RT;\t EliT OF C0tvllvlti'{lTY D EVELO P:\,IEN T'
SALES ACTION FOR:\t
75 SOUTH 3RONTAGE ROAD
8r 657
0t 6000 41510 ZCT}{O fu\D ADDRTSS hIAPS
0l m00 424l.t ttNrF O R\t B uil.D-1..-'c c o D E
UMFO&\.| PLuVdt\CCODE0t 0000.r2415
UMFOR}{ .IWECH^hICAL CODE0l 0000 42.il5
0t 00c0{2{t5 UNIFOfu\f FJRE CODE
0t 0000 q?1lJ N,l T]O}'AL EL ECTR'CAL CO DE
0l 0000.{24r5 OTIiER CODE 5OOKs
0t cooo.lr543 BLUE PRf,VTs C\IYLAR
0l 0000{21t2 ):ER OX COPlgS / S'iUDIES
0t 00c{{?i?t PENAI.TY FEES / RE.NSPECTIONS
ol 00c0.r t 332 i pt,tv REvlnv RE.cHEcK FEE Is.(o FER liR.
OFF HOURS T\ISPECTION FEES
CONTL\CTO R5 LICL\S ES FEIX0r 001011{t2
0l 0000{t330
SIGN APPLICATION EE.01 c$00 414 r 3
0l 00co414t3 ADDITIONAI- SIGNAGE EE ISI.OO ?FR, SO.IT.
0l c(80 {2.{i0 VTC ART FROJF.CT DONATJON
0t 00004t33t PRE P.AJD DES1GN REVIE1Y BOARD FEE
0l co1042412 BUILDING-CONSTRUCTION PSRUIT COMPI]TER D
OT OOOO 4237I IWESTICATION I'EE (BUILDING)
0l 00cr0{t330 tsPEc[AL D
/