HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL COMMONS 1980 PLAN INFORMATION LEGALo
: -/ / '()
, / t</')"''''frvz Q'<>v
D, Q0'l
ld- /?tt'"
{
WEST VAIL COMMON
PRELIMINARY PLAN INFORMATION
submi tted by
Br iner./Scott Arch i tects
. for
West Vail Associates, Ltd.
Harch 31, 1980
--:r'|'F'1-----"-'
:',Sf;il:??g :il1: l::t:I if:ti#";'t?'iiiit,ns and Deve,opmen,
143 e meadow dr. Box 179
vqr!. cobrado 81657 Eag I e , Co I orado 8 | 63 I(303) 476.3038
March 31, 1980
TAB/ahp
re: Prel iminary Plan
West Vail Common
Dear l,lembers of the Eagle County Planning Cormission:
I have been authorized by West Vail Associates, Ltd., the developerof the proposed West Vail Conunon, to seek your approval of the Prelim-
inary Plan for this project.
Enclosed are the materials requi red for your review along wlth an
application fee of $6U0. 1fu.a4
lf there are any quest ion regarding the material being suhnitted,I would be happy to answer them.
Thank you for your considerat ion.
Tdilr^h'W
Thoma s A. Briner
Pre I iminary Plan
l,lest Vail Common
List of Prel iminary Plan Review Materials
Maps and Drawings:
l. VicinitY Sketch MaP
2. Prel iminary Plan Zoning Requirements
3. Prel iminarY Plat with Contours
4, Prel iminarY LandscaPe Plan
5. Prel iminary Landscape Plan - Court Detail
6. Proposed Dra inage Plan
7. Proposed Site Uti I ltY Plan
8. Bui lding Basement PIan
9. Building Ground Level Plan
10. Building Second Level Plan
ll. Building Third Level Plan
12. Typical Condomin ium Plans
Text:
l. List of Prel iminary Plan Review Materials
2. Location HaP
3. SumrnarY DescriPtion
4, Statement of Need
5. Resource List
6. Reference Mater i a I
7. Legal Description, Preliminary
8. Covenant s
9. Soi ls and GeologY
10. l{ildfire and Wildlife
ll. Traffic AnalYsis
12. Landscape Concept and Plant List
13. Letter from Yoder Engineering re: Availabil
14. Names and Hail ing Addresses of Adjacent Land
Itt = 601
lrr = 301lt'= 30'
1t = 301
l/l6rr = lr-0
lrr = 30'
lrr = 301
l/l6I = l'-0
l/16" = 1r-0
l/16" ='l '-0l/16" = l'-0
'1 /I1tt = lr-0
1:24000
ity of Utilities
and Condominium Owners
Nff;,p,.) \N.//Jru/iiA( \Zs|':--J-+j), \):j)ffi' / I r\l\\r\\ \ rt\ \) N\\\JKd.W,,/ii(.$\,/, lY .lxxN
(r
\ i:-
mi?Ki%,ru.\Y']zr,:ia-i!.ffi
i,7 "
March 31, 1980
Prel iminary Plan
West Vail Common
Summary Desc r i pt ion
The West Vail Common Project is a mixed use bullding that accommodates
commercial retail and office space, residential condominiums and underground
parking. The total area for the building, not including parking, is approx-
imately l3B,00O square feet. Thi rty six condominium units compri se one third
the total area.
The project is located on 6.6 acres immediately east of the Vail das
Schone Shopping Center. Zoning is 'rcommercial l imitedil. Major publ ic access
wi ll be from the l-70 North Frontage Road which the developer proposes to
improve by adding a deceleration lane from the east and a left turn lane
from the west. A secondary access is proposed from Chamonix Lane.
The parking requirement is met by the provision of 291 surface spaces
and 56 spaces within the building, for a total of 3\7 spaces- Snow removal
areas equal I ing approximately 202 of the surface parking area are provided
within a 12 foot deep band general ly surround ing the parking lot.
The orientation and juxtaposi ton of the proposed project to the ex-
isting commerica I development to the west result from the following design
criteria:
a) The present parking lot should not be extended.
b) The new commerc ia I activity should be located in as close
proximity as possible to existing commercial development.
c) Good views should be available to all the condomin ium units.
d) Sunlight into the central court area is requi red for land-
scaping, snow removal , and the comfort and interest of patrons
and res i dents.
The building envelope has decreased by approximately 30% from what was des-
cribed in the Sketch Plan. The maximum height of the building will be less
than 35 feet. Front and rear setbacks are 50 feet from the north and south
property lines and the side yard setback adjacent the Vail das Schone Shopping
Center is 18 feet from the property line.
ApproximatelV 322 of the site wi ll be landscaped. The interior court wi ll
be more formally planted and landscaped with various plant and tree materials
and paving patterns. There will be a variety of over looks, and small activity
spaces within this one half acre area. The perimeter of the site is to be
.eavily planted, less formally, to screen the building and parking lot from
passers by. The landscaping wi ll take place concurrent with the phases of
construction,
Prel iminary Plan
lles t Vai I Common
Summary Descr i pt ion
Page 2
The project is expected to be constructed in a maximum of three phases.
Phase One tnrould start with site grading and utility work during the Fall of-
t980, weather permitting. Phase iwo construction rarould begin during the Spring
of lg82,Phase Three to begin during the Spring of 1983. Total building com-
pletion is expected by \/inter of .l984 with Phase Three landscaping continuing
through the Summer of 1985.
t4arch 31, 1980
Prel iminary Plan
West Vail Common
Statement of Need
The site for West Vail Common is the.last buildable slte large enough for
substantial construction that is presently zoned for commercial use in the Vail
area. The site is adjacent to existing cornrnercial and condominium development.
Utilities are available to the site. Access to the site does not i nterfer with
residential development but takes advantage of the Interstate and frontage road
n etu,or k .
Residential condominium sales within the Vail area have been active since
1974. Prices for centrally located condominium units have reached 300 dollars
per square foot this winter. 0nly two units remain unsold in the Vail das Schone
Shopping Center building. Dwelling units within a few steps of shops have been
popular particularly for out of town residents who, when they vislt Vail, do not
like to depend on a car for shopping. Combining dwell ing units with commercial
activity adds a convenience to the resident and keeps a shopping area that would
otherwise be dark and inactive after closing alive and more secure due to the
presence of the condominium residents. lt is expected that interest in residen-
tial propert ies will rema in high in the Vail area. The high prices for res idences
is due inpart to the total market not being up to the current demand and this has
forced many people who work in Vail to seek housing down Valley. The unique
proximity of the dwelling units in this project to shopping, to an eventual pub-
lic transportat ion system and to Vail's resort bus inesses and recreat ion should
make a favorable impact on the local housing need.
At present lt is difficult, if not impossible, to f ind retai I and office
space in the Vail area. Space for large tenants is not avai lable. The Vail Pro-
fessional Building ( Vail National Bank Building ) was completed ln the Fall of
1977 and was fully rented by the time construct ion was complete. lt rema ins l00Z
occupied with a waiting list. The Vail Mall, completed in 1978, the western most
retail building at Vail das Schone, is presently 100% rented. The retail and
office area proposed in West Vail Common will provide sPace needed by local
retailers and businesses seeking to expa,rd as well as to those bus inesses wish-
ing to move into a growing conrmunity.
Harch 31, 1980
Pre I iminary Plan
I'lest Vail Corunon
Resource List
Owner: West Vail Associates, Ltd.
!!lJ Lawler Avenue, Suite 410
Skokie, lllinois 50075
tefephone 312 677-5395
Consu I tant s i
Briner/Scott Architects P.C.
143 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
telephone 476-3038
Yoder Eng ineer ing Consultants Inc.
P.0. Box 249
125 North Eighth Street
Grand Junct ion, Colorado 81501
telephone 2lt5-0148
Chen and Assoc iates I nc. , So i I s Eng ineers
95 So. Zuni
Denver, colorado 80223
telephone 7\4-7105
Leigh, Scott and Cleary Inc. Traffic Engineers
t515 Downing Street
Denver, Colorado 80218
telephone 861-3088
Richards Engineering
Box Cl00
Avon, Colorado 86120
telephone 949-5072
Rick Lamb Associates Landscape Architects
5 Boylston Street
Cambridge, Mass. 02138
tetlphone 617 868-1939
Also consu I ted:
Tom Boni, Assistant Director of Planning, Eagle County
Erik Edeen, Environmental Health Officer, Eagle County
Mel Atwell, County Engineer, Eagle County
David Campbell, District Safety and Traffic Engineer, Colorado State
Department of Highways
Prel lminary Plan
West Vail Common
O Resource List (cont)
Rick 0lson, District Conservationist, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Reference Haterial:
Subdivisions Regulations of Eagle County' C0
Zoning Resolut i.on Eagle CountY
"Eagle-Vail PUD Guidelinestt re: Snow Rernova I
Sketch Plan, West Vall Plaza (Conmon) August l, 1979
Correspondence from Eagle County Planning and'rDevelopment:ttstaff Recommendations on ltems September 19,1979 Planning Conmission
Agenda
Torn Boni Letter October 30, 1979
A Legal Description of a Parcel of land lying within the
Southeast one-quarter of Section J-I, and the Southwest one-quarter of Section 12, Township 5 South, Range Bl l{est of the
Sixth Princi-pal Meridian, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Southerly right-of-way of
Char,ronix Lane, the Northeast corner of Vail Das Schone Condominiums,
frorl. whence the Northeast corner of the Southwest one-quarter of the
Southeast one-quarter of said Section 11 bears S 67"24t37u W 792.55
feet; thence along said right-of-way the foll-owing five courses:
f) N 55o26129't E 166.82 feet to a point of curvei thence
2l along the arc of said curve 8L.77 feet, whose radius is
lrl-35.80 feet and whose chord bears N 53o22r44n E 81.75
feet to a point of tangent; thence
3) N 51"19r00" E 273.50 feet; thence4) LL2.47 feet along the arc of a 4L4,37 foot radius curve
to the right, having a central angle of l-5o33r08r and whose
long chord bears N 59005r34" E l-12.13 feet; thence
5) N 66"52'08u E 100.00 feet;
i
tlrence leaving said right-of-way S 37"01'24" E 322.75 feet to a -point on the North right-of=+ray of I-70; thence along the arc of
a curve on said right-of-way 346.92 feet, whose radius is 51910
feet, and whose long chord bears S 45o43r5ln W 346.87 feet to a-
point of tangent; thence continuing along said right-of-way line'
S 42a02'56" W 339.00 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way liner
N 44o06'35" W 469.16 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing
283,480 square feet or 6.508 acres more or less.
WEST VAIL ASSOCIATES, LTD.
PRELIMINARY PLAN
WEST VAIL COHMONcwmf'6-
GENERAL PARTNER:
WEST VAIL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
G. HUDSON WIRTH_PRESIDENT
(K)
9933 Lawler Avonue. Sulte 410, Skokie, llllnols 60076-Phon€ (312) 677-6305
(7.)
March 4,
COMMONS
I9B0
WEST VAIL
PRELTMINARY PLAN INFORMATION
BRTEF DESCRTPTION OF PROPOSED COVENANTS:
Not applicable since this property is not being subdivided
into lots for residential buiJ-ding. However, the proposed
project includes condominiums. A rePresentative condo
declaration on the adjacent building, owned by the same
partnership (West VaiI Associates, I-,td.), has been recorded
in Eagle county since 1977 and is available for inspection.
AII covenants wiII abide by Eagle County Regulations and
Author ity.
chen and associates, inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
toltttolrxolTlox ec 8. zut|l
rxoirrtrtro
EI'GINEERI}G GMIG:T A}ID soIL N'ESIIGATICN
PROrcED OFE'ICE BUILDITG IN \IAIL BS SCIOIE,
FILITG 4, trEgl VAIL, @InRAm
Prepared For:
I€st Vail oevetbprent CorSnraticr
9933 Lewler Avenue, Sulle 410
S<okie, Illirp1s 600?6
303/7'aa-7105DEXVER. COLORADO IO2,I3
Job tlo. I9r21l,sePtsber 14, 1979
TABLE OF' @bTTEI.ITS
S@PE
PROPqSED @I|STTUCT.ICN
SrIE GNDISICI.IS
GDIGIC SSITDG
SJBSOII, OOIDITIONS
GDTGIC O{DITICINI AFFECIIIG ruSTD @bISI5ITTICN
ETIJNHnICN NMOO@NHITCI\IS
GFqJND ETfrRS
SIIRFACE ERAII{IGE
PAVED PAFKITiG ANEA
llISCELIANmri
FIG. 1 . ICATTCN OF EXPI'RAITORI rcLES
FIGS. 2 and 3 - I.Gs oF EKPInRATotr TIoIES
FIGS. 4 thctrgh 7 - GRADAIICII TES! RES.JLTS
TABLE I - SI{IIAR( OF IAMRA[O8g TEST RESJI,TS
I
I
I
1
3
3
4
5
5
5
7
S@PE
this report €vers an engineerirry geoloqr arri soil investigaticr
for a six acre site, incldirg the proposed office b'ilding in vail
Das Sclone, fUirq il4r t{est Vail. boloraAo. The relprt presents
pertirent geologic conditiqrs ard covers tlre ret desireable tlpe
fo.rndation, al.rcryable soir Srressure, rdater tabLe orditiors ard other
oiL related deeign ard @nstruction details.
PROPOSED EISI5I.ICTICN
$b undeEEtard ttre prrcposed brltdlrg will. be a ttrreestory
structure for retail stores, offices, and cordcnriniuns. construction
wirr be either steer frane or conqiete. ttre h.rirdtrg wirr harre a
garden rerer, wittr nu:<imrrn o.rts ard filrs on the order of six to eight
feet.
rf the building design is significantry different frcrn rhar
descri-bed abover rre shouJ.d be notified to re-evar_uate ttre
reccrurerdations contaircd in tiris report.
SITE OIDIITCI.E
The site is a vacant ]ot east of trre present VaiI Das schone
blilding in ttre l{est Vail pLaza. Ihe existirg b.rllding is a
three-story hood ard concrete stnrcture in excerrent ordition frq;r a
fourdation standpoint.
. The lot slcpee to tlre hest at 4 to 6t, w"ith spa.rse to rp&rate
leed and thistle cover. serreral. pires of fil up to 9 feet high are
on the lot; ttre location of these piles is stown cn the site plan
-2-
(Fig. 1). The fill appears to be very sjrnilar to orFsite soiLs.
Addltionally, a large pile of ror:rrled granitlc boulders is ]ocated
just hest of tbst tble 4.
The gnannd surface on ttre site is quite erratic due to irregular
placenent of fj.Ll in scne places. @reral slo6n on the site is
gerErau.y to the t€st at 4 to 6t.
A snall drainage ditch separates the slte frcrn the asphalt
Parking area for the existirg shoping center. lib r,rater r+as florirrg in
this ditdl at tbe tirTp of drillirg, nor.!nas ther.e any surface water on
the site.
GMT.GIC SSTTN|G
The site is ag4roxir.ately 40 feet aborrc ttre present LeveL of Gore
creek. Ttrin terrace delreits of sirt and clay cap the site. our test
holes j.rriicate ttrat these al.ruvial deposits rarge frcrn nir to 4 feet
in depth.
Beneath tie thin alluvial cover ar€ pleistocene glaciar deposits.
l4ore specificalty, tfrey represent tlre termtnar nnrairre of the Bur.]
Iake Age Glaciation. the glacial tilr is unstratified crayey sards
with qrarrels, obbres arri bcul.ders. rhe botrlders ard obbl.es are
generalJ-y subncunded to subargular sardstone fragnents ard subrcunded
to ro.oded pieces of granite. The t,iu is gercrarry red to reddish
bncnn in o.Ior ard lrolst.
Bedrcci( urderryirg the site is the Minturn Fornntion of penrsyr-
vanian Age. lbe llintur:t crcps out on the steep hi]]side rprt]r ard
norttlrrest' of ttre site. the !.oc* is prinarrly a L€d onclcrreritic
-3-
^
sardstone, wiehr local ]furcstone lenses. Ttre rock is generally guitevhard. Ihe @nt.act betreen the ![inturn ard ttre orrerlyirry l4aroon
Formatj.on is approxfuutely 1000 feet above the site on the rprth sjde.
S{JBSOIL CC$IDITICIIS
Sr.rlosoil corditions at ttre site here irvestigated by drlllirg
eight exploratory fpLes in t}te buj-ldirg ar"ea ard trro addit,ional. fpl.es
in ttre parkirg area to tbe east. Soil corditiqrs enccuntered incfuded
scattered fill to depths of I V2 feet.. Ttre fill r*as gererally clayey
ard siJty sards, nedir-un brown in color, w"itlr occasicral gravels arrJ
srnall obbLes. llaturaL sardy clalr ard silts \€re encounteed belcn
the fill in Itsst llcles 2 ard 3, ard at the surface in Holes 4, 5, 7, 8
ard the tro holes in the parkirg area. the silts aruJ clays are
O generally dry to slightly rpist ard nrediun brcr,n in olor.
Beneath these surficia] soils are tlre glacial delsits, cons is-
tirg of obbJ.es ard boulders set !n a red clayey sard nstrix. Ttrese
deposits exterd to tfn rnaximun depth inriestigated, 25 feet. Dritl rig
refusaL $,as crtnpn cr lange boulders at depttrs beb"een 15 ard 20 feet.
Gradation testirg resuJ.ts are presented cr Figs. 4 throrgh 7. Ttre
Gradations include only material less than 2 inctres in dianeter.
Free water rdas not encountered in anv of our test holes.
GMI.GIC @{DITICNS AFFECTI}G PROPOSED OiISIzuCTIOI
there are no arditions at t}le site lrttich oonstitute a nnjor
geologic hazard.. hb do not anticipate any unusual pnoblons associated
-4-
with the sice geology or soil. conditions prwided that, nonral good
engineerirg practices are folJ.qaed durirrg planninq and onstrrrction.
NLrErcus botrlders ard obbles will be en@untered durirg ex-
ca\ration. l4ost of these.will be of a srnall eno.rgh size to be renroried
by 1i9ht dut)t earth nrcvirg equiSnent. Occasiqnl large bou].ders nny
require heavier duQr equignent.
FCIJNMTICN RE@.II,IENDATICbJS
Considerirg the prcposed constnrction arri srrbsoil corditj"ons, we
befieve the noet, desireabre type fourdation for ttre br.rirdirq wpurd be
spread footirgs placed on the natural derse sards ard gravels, beLcw
the upper fiLl.sr silts ard clays. Fbotings can also be placed on
oontrorred ccmpacted fiu.. The follcryirg design ard constmctiqr
details should be obsenred:
(]) Footirgs qr the naturaL sanCs ard gravels should be designed for
a maximr-lr soil pressune of 41000 psf. Urder this pressure he
estinrace that totaL settLerrEnt, wirr be on the order of r inctr ard
rnximrn differential settJ.erent across the prropcsed bcrildirg wirr
be Less than 3rl4 indr.
(2') lrer., fill reguired belcnr footirgs stould be onpacted to at .Least
l00t stardard koctor density. Itre fiII shoutd extenrl beyord ttre
f@ti.rrg on eacfi side egual to ttre depttr of fi-tl. The existirg
fiII shoul.d be renrcrved first. The fill shoul.d be linLited ro
minus 6-inch raterial..
(3) Contlnr.pus fourdation rall.s sfpuld be reinforced top ard bottqn
to span an unsuppoft,ed lengtn of at least I0 feet.
-5-
(4) f.ocaL soft pod<ets of soil found within the loaded depth of the
footings or belcrr filled aneas should be rencved and ttre footirgs
exterded to the loqer firn soils, or the soft soils replaced
ccnpacted.
(5) D<terior footirgs should be prwided with adequate soj-I cover
aborze their bearirg eLevation for fret trrotection.
@CXJI{D FL&RS
The existirg fill strouLd be scarified.and ccrnpacted to at least
95$ starriard psctor density. Any neo fill .should consist of ninus 6
ineh rnateriar also ccrnpacted to 95t starrlard proctor density. Ttre
ccrnpacted fiII or on site soils r+outd tlren be suitable to supporc
slab-on-grade @nstnrctj.on. Sl,abs slpr't1d be separated frqn all
bearirg rrernbers with a peitive exgnnsion joint ard adequately
reinforced. A 4-indr rayer of free drainirg giravel sbculd be prcxrided
beneath the floor stabs to selnre as a levelirg course ard to dis-
tribrte the floor loadirgs. rf the natural or fill soil.s at subgrade
level are cl,ean ard granular, tJle gravel layer nny be qnitted.
STJRFACE DRAIIIAGE
Ilre foLlcnirg drainage precautions stpuld be obsenred durirg
construction ard rmintained at al.I tines after the br,rildirq has been
ccrnpleted:
(f ) b<cessive ltettirg or dryirg of the foundation excavation slpul.d
be avoided dr.uirq corrstrrrtiqr
-6-
l2', Badcfill arourd the h.riJ.dirq sLpuLd be npisterpd ard oonpacted to
at least 90t starxiard hroctor density.
(3) The grurd surface surnourdirg the er<terior of the brildirg
should be slcped to drain away fron tie br:iIdj.rg in aII
directiqs.
(4) Rmf dcrnspouts ard drains slpuld di.scharge rttell belord the
thlits of aII badditl.
PA\ED PASKI}E AREA
l€ understard that vehicufar traffic wiII consist of personal
cars and occasional delivery trucks. Provided ttrat ttre total gir6s
r.reight. of irdividual. trucks does rpt o<c',eed ]51000 lnurds' lne re-
ccrmerd ttre follorrirg pavenEne section:
(f ) Five incires of asphaltic @ncrete or'
(2) I\rp indres of asphalt,ic concrete orrcrlyirg 6 inctres of base
co,rrse.
Ttre subgrade sfpuld be scarified ard ccrnpacted to 95t stardard
koctor density. shq]ld the traffic differ substantially frcrn t}le
above, r."e shptrld be rpti.f ied so tlrat lve can re-evaLuate our
reccnrerdations.
-7-
}.lISCELIANMJS
' Ihis report has been prepared in acconlance with gererally
accepted soil ard foundation engineerirg Sxactic.es in this area for
the use of the cLient for desj.gn purposes. Ttre conclusions ard
reccrruerdations sublitted in ttris report are based upon the data
obtained frcrn the exploratory holes drilIed at the locations irdicaced
on tlp exploratory lnle plan. 5he nature ard extent of variations
betv,een the exploratory holes nEly not beqre evident until excavatign
is perfonred. If, durirg constnrction, soil, r.ock ad grourd water
conditions am)ear to be differen! frcrn those described herein, this
offi.ce should be advised at, once so thrat re-evaLuation of the
reccnurerdations rmy be nade. t{e reqnmrd orrsite observat.ion of
excavations ard foundation bearirg strata by a soil ergineer.
CHEN AtD ASS€IATE9, r}E.
rcCllmt
Brirerferkinsf itzhugh S@tt
Mr. c. Hudson Wirth
By
or
c
-.< a
a
o
J\!
\:\3\t
\*\
o
..'l-l^
,/
,/
..-- ;t
o rE
Iil/
J'/
ll
o
..
?'-
'///
o-2.'
'o-
7'
V
\l\
I'
lttJ - lloltvlll3
9
F
9
tt
-l9r
t- _.
-lr-'
:Yl-'
:Yt-'
:t9-'
:Tt-:
-lt-'
-lc-'
\.
i -::-l '.,- ttl .,- -"t'-l--
\o-N-o \';.]JIR ;
-tJc I d
.o- 5
e.t;? I
:g rvi .! ro
.ttU - lollvltll
,J'"lr-,
El.-82.01
l,_,
8.0 |
F
t.|.I1!t!
I
-o
t-
lrjJl!
16t5
WC-3.7
LL.I3:
P l-6 01
;200:l I
30/9
llrcl c
El .-7
N0TES: i
27/12
tlC-A. 5
LL-21
Pl-t4
-200-17
z519
'
Ftrl
trl
ll
I
z,o
F
l4.l
J
l!
LEGEND:
lVl rtll. sand, clsYoY,
- KJ clavs, modlum brown,v gcattorGd gravcl s I
SOrnC Vcry
mo l st,
sandy (r )
(2)
.ii
lTcst holos wero drl I
,August 26, 1979 wlth
'.d I amcter cont I nuous
au9cr.
E I cvat lons
lcd on
a l-lnch
f I lght pomr
Clay (Ct-), sl ltY, sl lghtlY ntolst,
rcddlsh brown, stlff, scattorcd
g ravc I s . i
Sl I t (ML) , clayoy,' drY to sl tghtlY
nol st , mcd lum brown', scattcrod
g ravo I
Sand and gravcl (Sc-CC), claYoY,
scattcrcd cobblos c bouldorr, rolst,
roddlrh brorrn, mcdlum dcnso to vcry
I
arc approxlmat. and
f rom contourr on Plansv.'crc tskon
Proy t dcd .
(3)No f roc wetcr r'{as found rt tcst
holor at tlmc of drllllng'
(,r) vc -
LL-
Pl '
Wator contont (t);
Llquld t-lmlt (8);
Plastlclty lndex (t).
F
I
dcn so
Undlsturbsd drlvc samplc. Tho symbol'isltz tndlcatcs thst 15 blows of a
140-pound harmcr fa I I I ng 1300 | nchos
woro roqul rad to drlvo tho samPlcr
12 lnchcs. l:r
Dlsturbod !tandrrd spllt spoon samplo'
Thc symbol 30/6 IndlcatGs that 30
blows of a 140-pound harmor falllng
30 Inchos wcrc roqulred to drlvo thc
ramplcr 6Inchcs.
tl9,2l I LOGS OF EXPLOMTORY HOLES Flg. l
Cxex AND
Cooultirp Sollcrd
Assocrerrr
Foundotlon Englnon
Fa.t arrt aal rl
Dtrrttat ll trLltft l al I
CLIY (rlrrl€l tio |||.l lE Raatrcl
orAvGL O %
LIOUID LIMI"
re,r.rLr oF Sandy
gL^Y r2r.rlEl lo l||.l lrr- h.llr€l
20 % .rLr
T, PLAaTlc | 7Y
80%
%
at dppth 4 foot.
.AN(,
7 ioM
AI'(, CLAY
I XOfX
Holc IClaX
i
o
!
I
I
t
aI;at
I
I
I
orAv (L
LIQUTD
.AT' 'LT
37 % .Axo 55 % rrLr ato cLAY
lrrarT 7, rL^aTrctrY rxorx
or Gravql lV 1a19 . _, 7ror. Hol c 2
GRAOATION TEST RESULTS
B%
*
at dopth 8 fcot.
..a.to .t li .. \. \- r{ J t atrl,.all 6tt a- art r-l
0rlr(l:a oa
l19Jlr Fl9. 4
Cxex lxo AssoctAtlt
C"oovl tlng Sol I crd FounJotlon Erplnoen
a
J
at
I
I
!aat
I
8
I nt
T
'o
a
I
I
I
t
I
aI:ra
a
I
I
I
cLlY |tr.alal t! tll? lro-Arlllcl
orlv:L 5\ %
LICIU IO LIMIT
cLlY rrlrar6l lro alL? lro- rr.rtrcl
uxo l$ 7. .r Lr
% PLA.Yrc I TY
il%
%
at depth I foot.ra'.pLr o' 9J lghtlyiCl?yoy,ifqqdY '.o-Gravcl .
A}.O CLAY
lxolx
Hol o P,lli. 1 I
OiA\, IL
Llouto
3AI/|PLJ
'53 * .Axo 30 % rtr.t axo cLAY
Lf Mrt % tLAaYrcrrY txocx
o' sllghtly sandy Grovoll. :rog Holo P2
GRAOATION TEST RESULTS
17%i
at dopth 2 fcot
Fls. 5
C^'?
orlrl Y I I Ll rt trLt (tlrl
..d'o .a Fa .a tr' \. ,{ t t etral.ara rEtr ar- aal rrt
Drart ?: I o? rar t rt rr!!l-Jtlar I
t9,21|
Cxe x lxo AssoctATls
C.omultlng Soll sd Foun&tlon Eqlnoer
!aat
Itt
I
ao
a(l
tc
ao
o
Ia
t
t
a
c
t
a
I
a
a
I
claY trlatlEl ?Q at||t tre.t|'altrcr
oi^vr.- \5 f
LIOU]O LIMIT
.^"o 30 % !r Lr
% FLAartct rv
25*
%
dcpth ! foot.
AXO CLAY
I HOfX
Holo 3 at
!
raat
I
I
a
rlt rLr ot Clayay,Sendy. 9rayol ri,,' (1.,r.o|4
GLAY rtrrr?El r0 lru lE- ,lrrllcl
oilviL l0 % rlxo 4l % .tLr Axo cLAY
Lrouro Ltrarr % ,LAarlclrY lxo:x
rar.FL. or Qrayp.l ,,,S,an1V glay,1 :rox 11616 4 93
GRAOATION TEST RESULTS
ao
ao
ro
C)
\9%
*
dcpth
?ra..a l.a to rtt trl a r.l I ll
Drlrtltt or mlrrcLl rl lrt-
?ia-ata ao lrr iI alt rrl
or.rl I t t or ,aatlcll rt IrLLul ?lrl
t1g,2l I
I fost.
Fl9. 5
Cxrx
Coilulting
AND
Soll ad
AssocrAr!t
Fqrn&tlm Englnoo
c
I
<l
I
I
I
c
!at
I
I
I
ttat
I
I
a
aI;t
I
&
a
CLIV lr!^l?rcl t(t ll|-l lrO-rl'ratrcl
cLlY trr.alrcl to ltL? tE- t!.llrcl
oravrL 5l %
Lleuto LlMlr
r,r,pL: ot lSl lghrly cl.aycy | ...,t. r.{ 'roMsandy gravel
rexo 25 oh .r Lt
% PLAattctrv
AXO CLAY
I XOaX
Hols 6
l4%tl'
at depth 14 fect.
orAvfL
Lrou I o
!A r. 'L'
44 % .^"o . 43 % .r.-r Axo cr-aY
Llra I t % tqarrlcrrY txorx
or d.Clayoy.iGravclly Send rrou 1616 g 5s
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
13 olar
dopth 8 foot.
u L tYrtorrg ttr.r@ .|o .a.to oa
ott Ot t a ttt ^l^F r.rt -h,ta .l
or^rttat ot lfigll rt rt|.ltfalall
u I lrrr9^rg at..tO ia..otto .a
ctr o'. .a tt -l- b r.ra -lL .l ar rlr lr tal tl!
orrtalaa ot tratlcLt rr rrLLaJtllal
/19,2t I Fls. 7
',fi1 r
lrj
o.
F
J
o
vt
q)
|!L(,l
.a
c
.D
ru
ot-gl
ra
.rt
ov,
o
o
l-
ol
ra
.lt
o
o
ct-
o
€
'oc|!
u7
c,
.!l-
9l
.a
Ecovl
q)
oL
ol
ra
!
o
o
(ut-
C,l
{O
!co
q
(
L
c
ra
c
C
F<t-ztr, - tlJ(Jvro>4in o b)lrl<c{-o.c I u
o@ @ L
a{
q\
..f .g ,\
v,F
]J'
trl
F
G
td
v,
J:x:cF
9UJzG-
intzLu-OC(J o.
G33c
:E!ut qao
S9'
E HFg
:$h
v,!
=J
(9
E
lrJ
aocu,FF
F6I^
io;-r-
Jq,
o \o .:t
3r.3tE
=J
ct t'\(\l N
Eo>-rE^<(nhczXlrrr=koz
JUJ<GcD^iEJ<o
-I
sl
.f
@
rn
-t
o
c\t
r
o
tn
F IJ
It
r..r Po5
o
.:r
o
co
o
CN
o
.if
o (>
co
o o
N
lr,Jo (\.a ro €I
(\
Io
N
d\
=
.oo-t a
F-J
tra
ld
G
FoaFulTF
:Xtri -ota LtF<:<
o iczt-o
AI
rl|ELoo
c
f
U'
t soIL cll\:i,',.crriusrrcs
Dcp:ir co lccirock ! Deeo' :c:{ : u:c
S r:: i--c.: :' su,cioii . Fine sandy 10arn
., subsi:a:ur . Stony sandy clay 1oam, stony sandy loan
unirrcc/.j,silo classj,flca:ron3 l:il i:::t^:fLl"i[; very stonv loarv sand
Pcr;.cablliiy (belou 2 f,eec) : Rapid _ S.O to ZO.O in./trr.-Pe:ceni Coarse FragDents. (gr:vc1, cobble, stone) ; over 35t,So11 Re;c:ioa (ptt) : ?.4 to g.lr
Shrlnk-Slell PotenClal : lioderate to lovr
Po !e :t:ial Fros! Actlon'(suriace) : lioderateFlood llazard I Nonellyd ro).oglc Group r BCorrosivity-Stee1 I fligh- Cenorrte I MoJorots
DEGREE & :iiND OF LII{ITATIONS(0 is S1lghr, H 1s Hoderar,e,
S' ls. Seve re)
Scptlc Tank Abeorptlon
Flelds : S-stonlnegs
.) scwage Lagoona. : s - seepage, stoniress
Sanltary Landflli - Trench : S - seepage, stoniness
-Area : S-seepage
Snal.low Excavatlona : S _ stoninees
D.rcll!.:r6s n/basenenEs , S - "torrirr"""u/o baserrentc : M; S on slopeo over 15S
Local Roacia and StreeCa : M _ etcniness; S on slopes over 15*
SUI.....,,EILITY AS A SOURCE OF... .
Dally Cover for Landflll : poor
. ?opsoil ; poor - s tonjr:ess
S;.nd . Fa-i.r
Cravcl : F.r1r
ilsadf lll ; l.oor - lerge stones
OT?IER, SOIL FEATURTS., ti'J
' "ADva\ci coPy sltBJEcr ro cH.,A.\cE" Nor ro BE usED IN pL,'cE oF oir-sITE INvEsrrc,ATro:{.
ltcp Ualc:io. 12C._12D. LZti, I?I
o
i; \ /,ri,'ti \ .,''' ,4
: */'.:
rQll'Fr_'
o-
o
Unt'; 9
These soiLs are on mountain sidesJ.opes.
?he major soil is deep a'<i vrerl dralned. T;pical-Iy the s..rface layer is
iine sandy loan about I inches thick. The subsurface is stony fine
sandy Ioa.::r about 18 inches thick. The subsoil is stony clay loam about
10 inches thick. The underlylng layer is stony roam cxtending belor+ 60
inches.
Fermeabj.lity 1s rpderate.
Typicarly fhe surface layer of the ninor soir- i.s sardy loam about 2J i'ches
thlck. The subsolL is gravell_y sandy cla.y 1oam about 5 ilches thick.
The substraturi is gravelLy sarrdy loan.
Permeability ls moderately rapid.
Unit 12
These soils are on terraces ard. arLurrr a.l fans. They are deep and. we)J
dra:ned.
Typic.r] ly the surface layer is fine sandy loan about 3 to B inches thick.
Tiic subsoil is slony sandy c]-ay loarn abcut 9 to 1g inches thick. The
substratun is very stony roanpr sand or sandy loam that extends belov 60
inches . Permeability is rapld.
l{arch 31 , 1980
Preliminary Plan
West Vai I Cormon
tli ldfire and lJl ldl ife
Urbanization of the area due to prior development has rendered this slte
devold of most wildllfe. Also, the potentlal for wildlife is assumed not to
exist.
COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
l4arch 10, 1980
l4r. Tlrcrnas A. Briner
Briner,/Perkivs@tt ilrchitects
Ea!,ller 2299vail, @Iorado 81652
Dear I,1r. Briner:
We have revierved the traffic analysis for the lriest VaiI Plaza
develogrcnt. blt I€igh, Scatt, & Cleary and generally agree with the
assesgrents and reacrmerrdations.
In addition to t}re eastbound left turn J.ane, a westbor:nd decel-
eration lane will need to be constn:cted for westborurd traffic turn-ing right into the shopping center.
Ve4z trul' Yours'
R. A. PROSENCts
DISTRTCT M{GINEER
DISIRTCT SAFETY & IRAFI'IC E{GINffi,
DBC: lnurXC: ProsencePllillip N. Scott III, Leigh, Scott, & Clearl
fi_le
P.O. Box 2107 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502 (303) 242-2862
- . / //]."rL.t:2,//
Lei€lh, Scott & Cleary, Inc.
TNANSPORTATION PT^ANNI NG
&, TRAFFIC ENGTNEERING CONSULTANTS
1615 Downing Strcel . Denver, Colorado 8OZl8
(3031861-3088
February 28, 1980
Mr. Thomas A. Briner
Brine r/Pe rkin/Scott Archite cts
Drawer 2299
Vail, CO 81657
Re; West VaiI Plaza
Dear Mr. Briner:
We have now completed our traffic impact analysis of theproposed West Vail Plaza commercial/office/residential
deveJ-opment in Eagle County, Colorado. The subject siteis l-ocaLed about 2400 feet east of the l-?Ofiest Vailinterchange between Chamonix Lane and the north I-70frontage road. The development is planned to become anintegral part of the larger West Vail Commercial Centerwhich presently extends between the West Vail interchange
and the site.
Roadwgy System
The roadway system serving the site i.s shown on the attachedillusLration. Al1 access for the development is plannedto take place t,o and from the North Frontage Road of I-70 ata point near the site's eastern boundary.
The North Frontage Road of I-70 is a major east,/west arterialroute which extends bet\nreen the West Vail residentiaL com-munity (north and west of Garmish Road) and the Tor,vn of Vaillocated over two rniles to the east. It is a paved, two-Iane
roadway which is posted for 25 miles-per-hour speeds nearthe site and 5-s striped with center and edge line pavementmarkings. Based on existing nearby land uses, it is estimatedthat the North Frontage Road carries approximately 2500average daily vehicle trips east of Garmish Road with lesseramounts of traffic to the east. About 10 percent of thesetake place during the peak-hour which generally occurs in mid-afternoon. The roadway's estimated service volume at Levelof Service E (capacity) is about II00 vehicles per hourind.icating that itroperates at about 70 percent of capacityduring peak-hoursr/eeak-hour traffic congestion pnesentty -
occurs along the North Frontage Road west of the site due tothe totar absence of turn lanes at critical entrance locati.ons.In addition, such congestion is worsened by an apparentshortage of parking stalls adjacent to high trafiic aenerationuses such as McDonaldt s Restaurant.
TBANSPONT]I$ION SI1STEMS . TMNSIT ' PARKING
I'EHICULAR ACCDSS ' PEIIESTRIAN & BICICLE PIANr-lN(i ' TflAFFIC OPEMTIONS 6L SAFEry ' sYsTEMs MANAGEMENT (TSM) . stCNAL DESIGN. T&{FFtc IMpAcT STUDIES
W:I
Mr. Thomas A. Briner
February 28, 1980'
Page 2
Interstate Highway 70 is a major east,/west freeway route serving
the central portion of Colorado. Nearby interchanges with
surface st,reets are located almost one-half mile west of and
two miles east of the site. According to nearby counts taken
by the Colorado Division of Highways in L978, average daily
I-70 traffic approxj-mates the following:
o Eastbound: 5400 and 4700 west and east of the
West Vail Interchange, respectively.
o Westbound: 5600 and 4600 west and east of the
West Vail Interchange, respectively.
The intersections formed by the ramps of the West VaiI Inter-
change in combination with the north and south frontage roads
and Garmish Road form a complex network of closely spaced
traffic patterns. Sight distances are limited and some traffic
congestion does occur during peak periods. An evaluation of
traffic acci.dents at the four intersections for the three-year
period ending December 31, 1977 revealed a total of 38 ac-
cidents (16 north of and 22 south of I-70). Of these, 13
vrere rear-end accident types and only one involved an injury.
Such an accident history is relatively 1ow in view of the
traffic activity and number of intersections involved.
Chamonix Lane is a paved, two-lane meandering roadway which
connects the residential area \'test of Garrnish Road with Buffer
Creek (Lion's Ridge) Road about 600 feet east of the site.
Present traffic activity adjacent to the site is relatively
lcnv (an.estimated 600 to 800 daily trips), on-street parkingj-s prohibited, and the speed limit is posted at 15 miles-per-
hour.
Traffic Generation
The aLtached tabulation reflects the amount of daily and peak-
hour traffic anticipated to be generated by West Vail Plaza.
As indicated, a total of 1410 vehicle trips into and out of
the site are expected. of these, mid-day peak-hour traffic will
consist of an estimated 117 entering and 165 exiting vehicles.
Traffic DistribuLion
Based on the demographic characteristics of the surrounding
area and the roadway system serving the siter the distribution
of west Vail P1aza traffic has been estimated and shown on the
attached j-llustration. As shown, this distribution results in
about two-thirds of the traffic being oriented to and from
the west with one-third oriented to the east. applying this
percentage distribution to the previously cited traffic aenera-tion data yields the daily and peak-hour turning movements
Mr. Thomas A. Briner
February 28, 1980
Page 3
anticipated at the development's access driveway.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on our traffic analysis of the West Vail Plaza developrnent,the following conclusions and recommendations are made:
1. The site is served by an east/west I-70
frontage road which currently operates at
about 70 percent of its capacity during
peak-hour periods.
2. The West vail I-70 Interchange west of the
site does experience some peak-hour congestion
due to the design of four closely spacedj-ntersections and a conplex pattern of turning
maneuvers associated with them. The traffic
accident history at this location does not
reflect a serious accident problem at t.his
location, however.
3. West Vaj-l Plaza is expected to generate a
total of 1410 arriving and departing vehicletrips per day,of which 1]7 wouLd enter and
165 would leave during the mj-d-day peak hour.
4- An analysis of the development's traffic dis-
tribution revealed about a two to one ratioof site traffic oriented to the west versusthe east along the North Frontage Road.
5. It is recommended that the site's parking
area be provided with a secondary access
driveway off of Chamonix Lane. This second
access point would reduce the amount of trafficactivity at the main entrance by an estimated
25 percent (15 and l0 percent towards the west
and east, respectively) while creating minimalinpact on Chamonix Lane traffic flovs and safety.
Such an access driveway would also provide
an important second point for emergency vehicleaccess. Also, the potential for short-cut
trips through the parking lot with two accesslocations is negligible due to the close' proximity of Buffer Creek Road.
6. It is recomrnended that the pavement be widened
and a painted left-turn lane be installed alongthe North Frontage Road on the eastbound approach
to the siters main entrance. Such a lane wilL
Mr. Thomas A. Briner
February 28, 1980
Page 4
provide refuge for vehicles waiting to turninto the deveJ.opment without disruiting east-bound through traffic.
7. It is recommended that the main access drivewavbe constructed so as to provide width for oneentering and two exiting lanes. This willenabl-e departing traffic to be segregated intoboth right and left-turning lanes while waitingto enter the l,torth Frontage Road.
8. It is recommended that the turning radii of thepavement at the main entrance be large enoughto facilitate right-turn traffic mo.vements intoand out of the si.te. A minimum 35-foot radiusis appropriate.
r hope the above information wilr ass_ist you with the planningfor west vail pLaza. rf we can be of any-further assiitanqJ,'please give me a call.
Sinerely,
LEIGIT, SCCrIT & CraARY, rNC.
/\l I n IBy l)'/J-: tl" . tl,k u-
PNS:tmc
cc: Mr. David Canpbell, CDHEnclosures: Estimated Traffic Generation TableIllustration of Estimated Traffic Distribution
s1_rl
-1
r.-- - ------.-__
N
Jc
Fo
UJ
=
F
H
H 3
a
F
6Ngc
6
.o3 el=
o El;t il->
: !t6E 6loI 4tc,; llo.i :t 6Cl 3lLol os al I
;EiisoooJ
NE
o
=
Es
F
a
4
-\
dE*-J !
G
o(!
6
colt
oz
6rloFlagrlO,
s\
s'
it
g
o:b-'c)! (!)
ci:"
ItA
z
9Ffg
EF<.0DN;j
ocIJE<
GFFo,Oull3
=Fo
UJ
F- F-l rnrnltol'{
cl F.t '.-l-l (F{
o.Fl
q{
q-{
r!
t{
FI
tr
I
J4o
oA
*; *;
oq \ooooaooFr --{ ro\\\q (Y) ?.1
o N rn/(oFJ/
o,-t
>+rF{ O^..{ lr -loo-Oct4ooo(,+Juru(!()rd
Ll "{ lq
O lt{
> lr..ldrdrr
FT
z
H
bl{
Fl {ZNFr(()FI
A
H r-lfiHF{44&E{ F{(DAHFl B
E
H
Er
lr1
+, I r..tAlool d
+J
()
E
O.o
r-l
q)
o
rct
r..
Ol
DFl
l.{
tr{r.r{ t{utoC OlFIO
nl FFtl FJ
lF{
coOFI .C.-l td . {J+JC n(!o E tl-l.lJ.-t 5 Oh +, .'{od c rrAE -'{ aos E Oco o
,o r.{ 'ld AHC C O.rFrH O .'l
Ot{llr tr .po< q{ |ooOr{+J..ac u .-l+ro c .c.Fl .rl .d O
+J +J O.ro,0 actr () oF{O O -lqo\f0C) '-l.q(, 0,+)u|rcor(ocd..{ H rU.-t tt 0,F>o?cl : o .tJoq.u E +, ..{..t o c(, F{ 0t o+JU.{a!.r{ t{ t!
.tJ +J C, F{.dtr F!,ro o artt +JC{J F- COc o)69 g 3o5 5 so() r/r 9.|!0 (4 0)coo { x
o| (rl f')
Ut h'-ll(! -{ q{l o o ol oH.F{ tl-{ I d c{ orl (\r
O .d (!l Fl Ln Fll co>Olrl (\ | e'r(Hl
d r\ r')
oo
+Joz
r\lq{ q{
oo,
ol rrro'dNl <ro.Fll coOUtl In<, c{(') :t
aOEo. _1 aO td '-l.C .Fl Co o +J.-l-{o cE4 fdo oo..f H'.{ O'ct d1! o|(|J ..{ q (t+, C q-r O O +,o oo ou OX()&F{
lc0,ou)
ooJ6ocr{(dAFI
Rick Lamb Associates
Landscape Architecture
Land Planning
Environmental Research
5 Boy ston Street
Cambridge
t\4assachusetts 021 38
!r 868 1939
Box 97
Barnstable
Massachusetls 02630
61 7 362 21 63
WEST VAIL COMMONSite Design ReporE
March 26, 1980
The basic concept of the planEing plan for the West
Vail Common landscape/site design draws from thenatural plant associations found in and near Vail.Visually, the developrnent should be inEegrated intothis naEural landscape. For boundary plantingdrift.s of evergreen and deciduous Erees are proposed
togeEher wiEh meadow grasses and low shrubs. With-in the central garden area, the native plant maEeri-als have been formalized to relate Eo the architec-tural geometry of the buildings.
Along the boundary of Lhe developmentr evergreen
spruce, pine, and fir trees are used to screen service
areas and portions of the parking lot; as well as, toprovide seasonal conErast l-n color, form, and texEure.
Deciduous maple, crab, and aspen trees will be usedto provide additional summer conErast and screening.
Groundcover materials will be native grasses and lowshrubs. An overall atEempE will be made to specifyplants wiEh deep root sysE.ems that will draw frorn
ground rdater and thus reduce reliance on a mechanicallrrigation system.
The central garden area formalizes Ehe massing of
evergreen and deciduous trees as seen on che surround-
ing mountains. Special attention has been glven to
the relaEionship of plants, walkway Eextures, rocks,
and water to create a pleasing garden both in Ehe sum-
mer and t.he winter. The tree massi-ngs are located to
create ever varying sequences of walkways, small sit-
ting areasra play area, and Eerraces for display, eat-ing, and people watching. Together with creaLing a
series of spaces for t.he enjoyment of visitors and res-
idenEs of West Vail Common, Ehe planting provides a
foreground for views up and down Ehe valley.
Circulation and surface treatment r{rere considered in
designing the paved areas within the development. Twodirect circulation sysfems were developed; one for thepedestrian, considering the handicap throughout; theother for the car, service and delivery vehicles, andthe snow plows. Native stone, part of fhe natural Eex-
ture and fabric of Vail, will be used as exposed aggre-
gaEe in the walkways and possi.bly rolled into the final
wearing course of the parking lot.
-|ttF --?
*- -'"
WesE Vail Common
Page 2
Rick Lamb Associales Site lighEing will consider aestheEics, saf eEy, and
durability. Concealed light sources on 17-2Or sEeelor wood poles will llght Ehe parking area. Walkwaylights will be in walls or contained wlEhln Ehe archi-tecture. AccenE lighcing will be placed wiEhln the
LandscapeArchileclure planting.
Land Planning
Envifonmental Research Trash and garbage will be handled both in receptacles
within the central garden and in dumpsters. The dump-
sters will be enclosed hrith fences and screened by
evergreen plant maEerial .
PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST
Trees: DecLduous
48 Acer saccharum t4-76 r, 4rr cal.
Sugar Maple
165 Populus tremuloldes 8-1Or, L2-74r, 4rt cal.
Quaking Aspen
Small Trees: 75
CraEeagus mollis 8-1Or
Downing Hawthorn
Eleagnus angustifolia 6-8'
Russian Olive
Ma1us adstringens 8-1Of, 2\" ca]-.
Hopa Crab-apple
Trees : Evergreen
75 Picea engelmanni 6-8t, 10-12'
Enelman Spruce
95 Picea pungens
Colorada Spruce
75 Pinus arisEataBristlecone Pine
s Boylston Street 55 Pinus edulis
Cambridge Pinyon Pine
:Massachusetts 021 38 55 Pinus ponderosaUz aoa tggs Ponderosa Pine
Box 97
Barnstable
Massachusetts 02630
617 362 2163
6-8' , 10-12 |
6-8,, 8-1Or
6-8'
6-8" 8-1O'
Rick Lamb Associates
Landscape Arch rleclu re
Land Planning
Environmental Research
5 Boylston Street
Cambridge
Massachusetts 02138
ItlT 868 1e3e
Box 97
Barnslable
Massachusetls 02630
617 362 2163
West Vail Common
Page 3
Shrubs:
Berberris Ehunbergi
Japanese Barberry
Cornus stolonlfera
Red-osier Dogwood
Cotoneaster acuEifolia
Peking CotoneasEer
Fragaria species
Wild Strawberrv
Grasses
Juniperus sabina tamariscifolia
Tamarix Juniper
Lonicera involucrata
Zabels blueleaf Honeysuckle
Potentilla fruEicosa
Shrubby cinquefoll
Flowers:
Achillea fillpendula
Yarrow
Aquilegia
Columbine
Chrysanthemum maximum
ShasEa Daisy
Dianthus plumarius
GoEEage Plnk
Iris siberlcaSlberian Iris
Papaver orientalOriental Poppy
Prepared by Albert R. Lamb III
LandscaPe ArchitecE
td *t4
r---2t-- \, a\.n
)'( )l )lilt li^\"(ilNliltltlN(i CONSLll;ll\N'l'S. lNC.
N rrtccltiutical urrrl clcctrical
Duvirl L.Vxkrr. l).|i. ' Vcrntxr S. l)cnis<xr . Jrrllcs li. lhatkkrcli
March 11, 1980
ItIr. Iom BrinerBriner, Scott ArchltectsP. 0. Box 2299ValI, Colorarlo 81657
Res West Vail Conmons, Availabllity of Utllltles
Dear ltlr. Sriner;
WATER
Mr. Frank Barrett of Wrlght and McL,aughlln, the West Vail
Water Distrlct engineers, states that the Weet Vall Commonsslte is bord.ered. on the north and south by B lnch water malns
whlch are looped and that the total flow capabllity should
be 4000 to 5000 GPM. Maxlnun calculated flre flow for theproJect j-s less than 1700 CPM. Water quantlty for no:snal
peak flow usage is estlnatecl to be 240 G?M. Ilater eervlceis therefore more than adequate.
SEWER
lhe Upper Eagle Val1ey Sanitatlon Dlstrict has a 1O lnch
sewer main on the north slaie of the north frontage roacl. theDistrict is in the process of cornpleting a major expan:ionof the sewage treatment plant at Avon as well as upgradlngcapacitles within the Dlstrlct sewage collectlon systen. the
design capabilities of these latest improvenents includetlprojected Population Equivalents for the West YaiI Conmonsslte. llhe ?nrs for the Connons project are estinatetl to be
573,
NATURAI, GAS
Publlc Servlce has matle improvements is its capabllity tode].iver natural gas to the upper valley. Accordlng to
Gary HaI1, locaI manager, gas service is aclJacent to theproject site in sufflcient quantltiee for the clevelopment
and Public Service woulcl very much like to serve the proJectwlth gas.
EINCTRICIry
We estimate the project wlIl have a demanrd of 1?OO KVA. I{alt
Do:man of Holy Cross Electric says that thls capaclty canbe hantiled by the electrlc utlIity.
P.O. Ilox 3231 103 East Seventh Street
I)urrng<r,Coloraclo 8l3ol . 303-247-3231
P.O. B<rx 249 125 North Eighth Street
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 . 303 -245 - 0148
)'ot)titi ItN(;tNtitit{tN(i coNsuu[\N't's, tNc.
N tttccltrurical arxl clcctricarl
David L Vrder, P.E. . Vernon S Dcnis<xr . James E. llraddock
As ls typlcal of nost utllltles, responsible people are wilIlngto verbally connlt eervlce based on our prellnlnary engJ-neering
calculations and proJectlons and, thelr professional evalu-ation of the appropriate utllity capacitlee. I have recelved.
no indication that any utllity servlces are or couLd be
substantlard. or overload.ed by thts project. Xach lndlcatesthat they have consid.ered a large commercial developnent
on the slte of our project in their deslgn and service
pro j ections.
I am therefore wllltng to state that we antlcipate no tlifficultyin obtalning comrnitments for utl-llty servlees upon fornalapplicatlon which would normally occur as technical deslgnis completed. or upon applj.cation by the proJect bulldlng
contractor as constructlon connencec.
If there are any questions, please clo not hesltate to calI.
'frmvUil^
David I.r. YoBer
Colorad.o Re-gistration #10715
DI:ff/me
P.O. Box 3231 lO3 East Seventh Street
Durango,Coforado 81301 . 303-247-3231
P.O. Box 249 125 North Eighth Street
Grand Junction, Cokrrado 81501 .303-245-0148
-l:[HT.-.,''..'
NAMES AND MAILING ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
LAN D AN D CON DO},I I N I UM OWNE RS
VAIL DAS SCHONE CONDOMINIUMS
Unit No.Name and Add res s
A5, 5, 15, 19, West Vai I Associates, Ltd.
?o E 26 9933 Lawler Avenue
Skokie, lllinois 60076
A-2 Spears, Larry D' E Rogers, Carol I !'/.
526 D. Avenue
Lawton, 0k, 73501
A-3 \,jg\./Associates,Ltd.
9933 Lawler Avenue, Su i te 410
Skokie, ll linois 60075
A-4 Kajita, Earnest T. e Yukiko
Box 27
Vail , Colorado 81657
Gussel J. Thomas
P.0. Box 3335
Aspen, Colorado 8l6ll
Showa lter, Howard G.
28354 Lorain Road
North Olmsted, 0hio 44070
A-8
A-9 Vesterstein, Pau I
3822 Gladstone Street
Du I uth, Hinnesota 558011
A-10 Scandinavian Ski Shop, Inc.
c/o Magnusson ; Bengt Rume
l62l Waukega Road
Glenview, lllinois 50025
A-ll Downhil I Associates, lnc.
c/o Helms, W. Richard
One IBM Plaza
Chicago, ll l inois 5O6l l
A-12 Hamrol , Burt Sr.
832 Fell St.
San Francisco, Cal ifornia 94 117
A-13 Heritage House Apt.
29 East First St.
Hinsdale, ll I inois 60521
A- 14 Franchi se 0perations, Inc.
28354 Lorain Road
North 0lmsted, 0hio q4070
A-15 Gore Valley InterPrises, Inc.
2l5l North Frontage Road West
Box 430
Vai l, Colorado 81657
vAlL DAS SCHoNE CoNDoHtNtUilS (conrinued)
o-lt !rii'lii3i'ii!i,!fo;,ire 4,0. Skokie, tllinois 50076
A- | 8 Franch i se Operat ions , Inc.
28364 Lorain Road
North 0lmsted, 0hio 4\O70
A-21 Dietrich, Joseph N.
9933 Lawler Avenue
Skokie, lllinois 60075
A'22 trJright, Carl M.
Box 2175
Vail, Colorado 81557
A-23 Brugh, Patrick J. E Leslie K.
Box 1502Vail, Colorado 81657
A-2lr Srello
c/o Wade, Lloyd R.
3275 South Steele St.
Denver, Colorado 8020 |
A'25 Gore Valley lnterprises, Inc.
215 | North Frontage Road I'les t
Box 430
Vai l, Colorado 81657
A-27 Pansing, James E.
50 south steele st., suite 558
Denver, Colorado 80209
A-2q Resort Propert ies
3894 Niagra Vay' Denver, Colorado 80237
RESUBDIVISION OF BUFFER CREEK
Lot No.
26
.,1
Erickson, Paul A.6 Jeannine
1300 South Foothill Dr.
Denver, Colorado 80228
Innsbruck Partners #2
Box 733Vaif, Colorado 81657
Jacobi, Jean Paul a Lillian
20447 Doria Lane
0lympia Fields, ll I inois 60461
28
Miller, l,rill iam Henry I | |
Box l!28
Vail, Colorado 81557
Kaspara it is, Arvin
Box 729Vaif, Colorado 81657
Kaspara it i s, Romas
Box 729Vail, Colorado 81557
Cole, Patrici a H. 6 Michael
Box 475Vail, Colorado 81657
Sam Davis Co. lnc.
c/o Davis, Roi C. Jr.
820 t6th st. #800
Denver, Colorado 8O2O2
Brandess, Leo, Jayne
c/o Brandess-Cadmus Rea I
8ox I 105
Vail, Colorado 81657
flclaughl in, S. Douglas e
Kel ton/Garton I nvestment
Box 66J
Vail, Colorado 81657
M. 6 Cole, Lynn L 6 Henry I
Estdte, Inc.
Hard i ng, Thomas G.
Co.
39^
VAIt HEIGHTS FILING NO. I
Lot No.
#5-f9
#12
#10, #ll E #13
VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOHINIUM #2
Lot #14 Un it No.
t-A
29
35
35
77
38
40A
Ri ckman, Pat r ic ia A.
Box 1383
Vail, Colorado 81657
Rickman, John W.
Box 1383
Vai|, Colorado 81657
Kn i9ht, Reuben B,
l90l Tenth St.
Wichita Fal ls, Texas 75301
l.larshal l, David 6 Mooney, Kemp
2099 Chamonlx Lane
Vail , Colorado 81657
D i xon, Gerald D.
c/o Ya I ley Cleaners
14 i nturn, Colorado 81545
l-B
Un it No.
I -C
ot #15
2-A
2-B
2-C
3-A
3-B
3-C
VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUIl #I
Davis, Ross Jr.
Box 190
Vail,,.Colorado 81657
osterfoss, James t Margaret M.
tsox 970Vail, Colorado 81657
L inden , Marge E,
Box 955Vail, Colorado 81657
Wheele.r, Janis K. E 0rReil ly, Brian E.
Box 291I
Vai l, Colorado 81557
Burket, Joseph F. ll a Jantzen, Wilma Sue
Box | 187
Va.i l, Colorado 81657
Mooney, H, K. lll
Genera l Delivery
Vail, Colorado 81657
E I iopu los , George
Box | 9q8Vail, Colorado 81657
Schroeder, Donn i s E.
214 North Broadway
Wayzata, I'l innesota 55391
Burgum, Freder ick
Arthur Farmers' E I evator Co.
Arthur, N.0.58005
Wett laufer, Warren Taylor
Box 3154Vail, Colorado 81657
Nigh, Jerry E Cathy
Box 485
Avon, Colorado 8.|520
Wood, Andrikopoulos g S imakso
c/o A. G. Andrikopoulos
Box 788
Cheyenne, Wyoming 72001
Tschopp, David E.
Box 1728
Vail, Colorado 81657
Unit No.
l.
2.
2
4.
5.
6.
Lot #15
Lot #16
7.
d,
10.
Low, Glenn E, Jr. a Gina
P.0. Box 273
Avon, Colorado 81520
Borstad, Darlene
Box | 454
Vaif, Colcrado 81657
Go lden, Bever ly J.
Box 1597Vail, Colorado 81657
Costel lo, Charl yn H.
Box 251Vail, Colorado 81657
0'Brien, Thomas C.
Box \32
Va il , Colorado 81657
Emr ick, Gary D.
Box X
Avon, Colorado 81520
J.
Hills, Dolores C.
550 Sunset Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 3313\
Nelson, David E. 6 Beals, Janet
Box 2874Vail, Colorado 81657
Hickey, Michael Patrick; Keenan, Janet Enge l
Box -2013
Vai l, Colorado 81657
McCoy, Wil I iam J.
Box | 547Vaif, Colorado 81657
Mil ls, Dolores C.
560 Sunset Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 3313\
Hoyt, Ellanor A.
Box 850
Vaif , Colorado 81657
Minne - Va il Vll
7ll South Smith Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55107
Maup in Roberta Jo
Box 2753Vail, Colorado 81657
ll
12.
Unit No.
l.
K.2.
3.
4.
(
6.
7.
8.
'rAlL HEIGHTS CoNDoHINIUM 3 (continued)
Lot #16 9.Snyder, Laura H.
Box 3412Vail, Colorado 81657
Debra S. Gillett
Box 907Vail, Colorado 81657
Hardy, Hichael R.
Box l9l I
Vail, Colorado 81657
Pyke, V i rg in ia A.
Box 1775
Vail, Colorado 81657
I0.
n.
ot #17 CRo0KED !Kl TiwL uousEs H0MEoWNERS ASSoCIATI0N
l.
12.
t.
Gilbert, Cynthia A.; Beeson, Frances A.; Beeson, Richard L-
Box 781Vail, Colorado 81657
Bass, Pat r ic ia L.
930 Windsor Tra i I
Roswel l, Georgia 30076
Langhoff, Charles R. E DeCook, Bruce E.
Box 2126
Vail, Colorado 81657
l.lorris, Gerald S. s Stephanie S.
260 A South Monaco Parkway
Denver, Colorado 80224
3.
4.