HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL INTERMOUNTAIN BLOCK 10 GENERAL LEGAL.-.
ID
f
waro
File No.Sep-€5-75 - Sietch Flen
ctrrnrnontSt
End the accgse ts
- l. i.,' : r-13
,, .' : c. : '
(2)
-($(4)
(5) A.
':.a.'' "-..i" lJilcb=3i s' Elalr ".ft,
r3.Jj
F::ile l.{oun:3ln Jr. - Sr. High school
:.'.-'a:a . ColtttCo
l,l ir.i urn Elorncnlary
Mtntum, Colorcd,
Fed Ctitl Elcmonlety
Rcd Cttlt, Colotttlo
l.4esCcw Mountaln Ele msntary
llinrum, Colorcdo
E?tle VBt,ey Jr. . St. Hicii S:!'.o!
' " ''' "t' Cc-:r'-
Et; le Va rit., ir -r1 -.1:';
EE? j'., C:''tt't? 0:'
MccoY Elemenlary
McCo'l' Cotoredo
EACLE COUNTY SCHOAL DISTRICT RE
'OJ328434
Esgle, Cotorsdo 81631
Otrica ot the SuPe nranddnt
TO: THE EiAGLE COUNfv PLANNING COIIMISSION
- tt a, ^Kl;: f Il_.E !\U. L-.iSp OO-/O n,c]'].s6cl
Gentlernen:
With regard to the referenced ProPosed development, it
is the position of the Board of Education of Eagle county
School Disillict Re- 50J that no developments having an
impact upon the school system be approved unless such
impact has been assessed and appropriate provisions have
been made for site dedLcations or in lieu payments aa
provided in the subilivision regnlations.
Please place our Representative on the agenda at tJte
hearing so that we ruay ailvise you of what we consieler to
be the School Districtts need caused by the proposed
develoSrment.
RECEIVED
l..f AV 1 | .^-^u,,f-l l .! * j:, o
,":,i,r,i r:.,j.,.!,,
Ea8io Cc{jjlty. Cots.
FeciLit.ie s Ci'orciir,a'lor
Box 386 Eagle. Colorado 81631
l.'l^ r 1r.| 1O'rA
'1- Lv' Ll!v
iiiiie 33air., E"-gle Cr-:'.ni.l' ?iar'ei'
'- rr.aarlF Il^rrYl:.r:v\r'-.-; r v_ J l; -:- g r-': - vaio- ?1o
i:g) ee Col-o:'eric ' I ,.::'
Ti:e Va:-L Inte:-r'i.:r'r,::-n $:e:ch Pl:n'.'ra: s,rb:ritt..d -.c ',"ie EagJe
Co'.'rrQr Slil Cense:r'st,ien Dist31et for re'rie..i a''d e?:n':en',.
I^Ie ha'','e ',.he
'l\
L.,/
")*.,]e\
A
srb'1itted.
<*:r r rlrr lra n.ar f^r'npd
'_' r, - -{1 q6- 1.ro "^r'Jd < '--a:' tia'. a e ^;---1 o+9 aoa'l 6.r.i p1'l
rn *.r.r. FF^-.6el.-t
Q-l rr.a-r''l "v...-- g,
1. ::, .a t i.
Rc: s E. Chanbe:s,
P:: sioent
RECEIVED
MAY 1? 1976
o*LolPsili: ;,;.*''
COLCRADO DEPARTMEIIT OF HEALTI{
1210 EAST lITH AVENUE
l'iay I J, llJ6
J'lr-. lii chael S. Blair, Di rector
D:partnent of Planning and Deve lopment
Eagle Count),
r. u. Dox /dy
Eagle, C0 Bl53l
. DENVER, COLORADO 80220 .
Eduard G. Dreyfus,. l'{.D., N.P.n..
PHONE 388-6111
Executlve Dlrector
RECEIVID
tilA.Y I 7 i37e
ilr.;:. v i
fuli€ Cc!:rU, Cl'3-
RE: Sketch Plan, Vai I Intermountain Subdivision, Block l0
Dear 1.1r. Blair:
The col orado Department of Health requests the Eagle county planning
ccnmission to vlithhold action on the proposal referred to above untilacditional information is suppiied to the Departr,€nt. we are unable to
ccnp lete our review of the proposed subdivision for the fol I or.ling reasons:
I ' The proposal does not indicate which water system wi ll serve theproposed subdivision, nor does the narrative make any nention of a
cen tral water system.
?- The proposal provides no information on sewage collection and treat-ment. we assume collection and treatment at the upper Eagle ValleySanitation District plant, if this assumption is correct, we wouldlike to see a letter from u.E.v.s.D. stating they have adequate un-
commi tted treatfient capaci ty to serve this subdivision. \{e have re-quested this information previously on other proposals, but we have
recei ved no inci ication our regues ts have been considered. The Divisionr'ay wi thhold favorable r ecorr-ren d a t i on s to the colorado vater Qualitycontrol conuni ssion to give approval to construct new interceptor linesconnectino to the u.E.v.s.D. svs te:n unti I rve receive s oi-'e type ofinventory on conni i tr,ien:s bv Li .E,\r.S.D.
Th=rl: 1,ou for- the opporiuni ty to reviev,, this proposal
Ve:;z t ruly i-ours,
F:t. ltRE.cTCF., ij.j.iai QUALtn' ccijTncL tivls t0N
i,i:,i=:- Q.-ral i tr, lia;, .,'..enent Plar:ring Section
|:.\tl / ;:h
..i Ecb Siek
Ii i-1. i.o,,:,er
!:-i _3r r->
Oe O6
Rer FIta Nc. s9p-66-?6. S!€tch Plsr' ''' ftet FJl6 NC. Stp-95-79 . Ul€Ec'l l-lEr ''
"!r; l_ '"
0'f Io tra#g n c49n.gg'1S1" tg-e.dr gEnrtv
-{
a dtE + { rt t
:ft\rlatnd-'ycii +plledlon on 6 Mry.'
tolJrl.rmprnrrrrtc,'rrortcoinmmadloyrq to 1u,.r nd-tho PlEttrtnS 9ernfnl$g{dgf+*F$+
of iirFFwil',iltdrrct,ltrfrftryfri::';.--:-.':',1-irl.,'1-]..i.,._].1-ry_f"..irEffi
a- -. .-:. --. . ,:... ,:t:;:. ,: -,1 ' , ,'-j j: ' -- .-;i
=..,:.
-i.1
".+s;rrend
th* $rel davclopcr EE.r"r U.i totto*ltg grestiryarl' '-,:l ",.- ' .- .-l- '- -.li;; =' -
ll",dled ereotoglc atrrcry 6t dl ttre lots to &tcrmlrp lt.6.fi stti b'Uuffc*fr1.f,*g1.*-
i. -*, a"<frao-p-r.rng ansr3 for cdr rlta, aec'tlona ttnt Urr Grrt * flll ical.ry.q1.4
I 3r.rlCAttlS ol lott-6r _l0r lt. crd lQ - ^.. - --- --, -i_ , :.;:;"$_:*."dl1{$'f,*I F;c,#;A; ;i; ;*r, ;'u'," artlr ar dc of isri na,-.r *rw,#;#-ffi:=- €W awry ls pceentfy locs*ed Inthe -center of trc e*lstlrp tood''.:" - .'.:r:- :-ffi=jGr "tt5t tc F ltcltt flt, lrta,(*tw lrl _r!..t| tYtst: '; .: .'::1 .'rr.-'t!*: -r
* arock-gourirAmatcf tn- lot 93'-." ,{-'i '" ::'-: ":'-':-': -' l-: '-:';r;.":'r:r:. '- ' : t t: '+.;..t . f$H:i.'l,
;: fn t :pp.g!l kg g*{t-rorf}qTqlF 3!!i:,.---,.-;rl:*;i; .,,-,.'. - *-. .:;-"; -,-1H;
.|lEt-.-.:l.:,*:'':!{':.]:.:.-:..':!i'1:.'|""::.|:..'i.;:I:1.f..t.::l:I-:"""\'ran'!]...
..', j -.', .,,:. ... -' .. i.';-''.,.' 1-*: .,1.'.,::r.t,-,,. -:l:.".Ii,1;r:,. j..:. . .. '1 , ,-r,i:-i" "r",:l.r:' '- -rildAAl{ *tll ba $l*ardrd ta UrCciirnttr,Pleilib GiFiifnl$lrn nrd l'|o.Ph}vtl|t}ffi#iY..T]*:-?T,*ff 1T,5:ll#,-?.j.#i,:Fy;i:i::,,ii{. L, _;._',.; .- -.+t*;-f+f :*<? q-.1.,- i,-,!.,;.+{,I1i".1?}lqJ-_
Y : -_ J+ :i.i ra: 1:-.'.!i.'3:F!: :- n;--rq-r*r. -'+::. ---. :;: :i-' '-:!- ' .:..:$
Mic,relg.Blatr. -.. , r ''-,,,..;1i_---.,.:i,,.i.,l ,-:;,iiij'
g:*s, cf Ca+':i1' Oer::.rnies!*tsiai-:..,,-:-. , '
"Y." srArEs Deeanruexr o, o"?r.'r.9
^a,,riVEDFOREST SERVIC€
).linturn, CO 81645
1 :,.1i7o
' , .,. .'j234o
i -..I
YIay 7, L976
T
Mr. Mike Blalr
Eagle County Dept. of Planning & Devel-oproent
Box 789
.Eag1e, C0 81631
De ar l{ike :
Subject: File No. Ssp-56-76
Va il- Intermountain
Box 705
Vail-, C0 81657
I{e have the following connents ln reference to the above referenced
sket ch plan.
1. The typical street sestion
a. 1:1 backslopes could be very unstable and cause
constant maintenance problems especially if the
soile are unstabl-e as indicated in the preLininary
geology review of the site. Even in stable solLs
1:1 slopes would be nearly inpossibl-e to revegetate.
b. The 2:1 fil1s1ope is unrealistic for Basingdale
Boulevard urhere much of the eountry it traverses
has a grouod slope of about 2:1, i.e. a 2:1 fiLl
slope wouJ-d never catch natural ground).
The widtb of the ditch is not indlcated.
Maintenance easernents from edge of 50 foot ROW to
toes of slopes are indicated. On the 50 percent
sideslopes of Basingdale Boulevard ' the total
width of ROII and maintenance easement would require
over L00 foot of width rthich could be a severe visual
impact on the land.
:" !,,;. Fr. i
0..:! 0.
. t :,t,1
Revised Sketch Plan
As so c iat es
c.
6rof-r r (1,/ltl
of'
2. We have severe reservations as to whether or not Dost
of the bultctings lndicated along Basingdale Boulevard
could feasiiiy"i"-i"fft and offlstreet anal access feasibly
be provided b'eca"se of the steep slopes indicated on the
Plan-
Wefeelthatthedeveloperhasfu]'filledtheSketchPlanrequirements
but can foresee nany diificulties because of the severity of the slte.
The prellnlnary plan if subaitted should include detaileil soils and
geology lnforrration
-ria ,no, details of the neasures planned to mitigate
the difflcultles.
Also with the prelirninary plan lre feel that the devel-oper's proposed
dog control plans be "p.ti-ii.a due to the proxinity of the deer
underpass.
SincerelY t
/A.O
\2[-!0 rq,
ERNEST R. NTNN
Dlstrict Ranger
I /--" 4zd.t Znainzzzs, LJnc.J
CIVIL INGINIIRING . PLANNING . SURVT.Ys
SUBDIV|SIONS . WATTR 6r SEwtR 5Y5TU{5
Aorlog 1908
Voil, Colorodo 816 57
Kannath E. Richordr phonc rldo6Dtr2l 949-5072 Rcgirterad Profcrsionol Enginccn
Dcnvcr)r?tlltFt 893-1531 Registared Lond Surveyorr
llav 3. 1976
o
.r?bX^
Re: Ssp-66-75 Revised Sketch Plan
40 Lhits, Block 10, Vail Internountain Subdivision II1AY 0 = lglf
Vail Internountain Associates
fipper Eagle val1ey saniration District o"ti,:;.ti '
Dear }lr. Blair:
Ihe proposed subdivision of Block 10, Vail Intermountain Subdivision can
be served by the facilities of the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District upon
proper extension of se'wer lines by the developer and payment of the standard
tap and service fees. Care should be taken by the developer to see that the
lines are deep enough to serve the units on the lower side of the roads.
line capacities are adequate and the sewage plant size is sufficient
for these additional units. An overall projection of growth potential for
this district will be forthcoming.
Mr. ]Iicira e 1 tslair
Plar:ning Derartnent
Pos t Office Box 789
Minturn, Colorado 81631 RECEIVED
Sincerely,'
RICHARDS ENGINEERS, INC. 1
:;-' ^--,..; ",2 ;? ,/ ./,/ '" 1', , ./- '/
Kenneth E, Richards
Engineer for tbe Dis trict
KER : cr
cc: Jr,hn .j.n:r:c. I'rtsidcnt
.la::,r:s Coilins. Sccrctary-,--;.per Ea31e i'a 1i e-r' Sanitarion Distrlct
Yail Intei'ilountain Assoclates, G,iner
O(-
United States Departrnent of the Interior
IN TEPLY AEFTN ?O
! t6). z
; : : ill,1:D
co
2.
3.
Will parking be a problem for some ofduplexes along Basingdale Blvd?
Grade still appears to be a detriment
building in the entire subdivision.
the
Stewart A. Wheeler,
Area lla:1ager
We will have more comments at the next Technical
Review Conmittee lueetinq.
Sincerely yours,
!
O{
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Gfenwood Springs Resource Af:ea
P.O. Box L009
Glenwood Springs, Colorado g15Ol
April 28, 1976
llichael Blair, planning Director
Eagle County Dept. of planning 6. DevelopmentCastle Peak Bui.lding
P-O. Box ?89
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Dear Mike:
We have reviewed the Vail Intermolatain Sketch plan
and have the following conrnents:
1. Ihe duplexes in sorne of the lots appear to bein drainage paths. perhaps a drai,nage planis in order.
APR 3 0 1976
o"*t';il;;r1,;,,,t
r :-,' i:: i,. i , r:t.; - .;r. .,Jrno.t{]5:r
Save Energy and You Serve America!
i.to
C.J. KUIPEA
State Engineer
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Depanmenl of Natural Resources
300 Columbine Bu i ld ing
1845 Sherman Streel
Denver, Colcrado 80203
Admini stration (303) 892-3581
Ground lVater (303) 892-3587
-:;'.r/iD
APR 2 S 1976
DepL 0i l,.i;;::; & Dr/*.
. f88h Couno.. Cdo',
April 26, 1976
Mr. Michael S. Blair, Director
Eagle County Department of Planning
P. O. Box 789
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Re: Vail Intermountain
Block 10, Sketch Plan
Dear Mr. Blair:
This is to acknowledge receipt of sketch plan material for the
above referenced subdivision. I have no objection to the approval of
the sketch plan provided a water resource report is submitted with
the preliminary plan which discloses that the Vail intermountain Water
District is capable of serving the subdivision.
very ly yours,
\-4.
puty State
Taric A Danielson
Engineer
JADIHDS:mvf
cci L. Enewold
Land Lise Comm.
O
FfiPAnTfiitl{T 0F PtfiitHiItI AIt$ FEilET$Pi'$ENf
Castle Peak Bldg. 510 Broad*'a1' Ir.O. Ilox 789 Engle, Colorado 6163I
23 April 1976
Re: File No. Ssp-66-76 Revised Sketch Plan
Applicant: Vail lntermountain Associates
P. O. Box 7O5
Vai l, Colorado 81657
Enclosed herewith is a revised Sketch Plan appl ication submitted to the Eagle County
Planning Commission for review anrd recommendation at their regular meeting on
19 May 1976.
In accordance with C.R.S. 106-2-9, 106-2-33, and 106-2-34, 1963, as amended and
Eagle County Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.05 and 3.O7, 1972, you are required
to receive the plan, and you have 24 days from date mai led within which to respond or
the plan will be deemed to have been approved by your agency.
The Planning Commission would sincerely appreciate your comments and recommendations
a few days prior to the meeting date. lf you desire additional information or tirne,
please advise this office, in writing.
Thank you very much,
2-2//,'gz-'-Michael S. Blair
D i reotor
MSB/kt
Planning f)t';r;rilr. l rrl ?lilrning Oommissi.rn: SuMivision, Rezorirrg. -{p1'licatilns anrj Reyicq' i3,13, 3f5-.-?3ti
D..il.fi,.,, l-ilfi,.:.1. q'.;';;.- D.,;:::its lr:C I::,:,r."::l':. Zr,riir| -i_C:::i:i:::-:ri;..:: .:rit3i 335_l;339
lAott c0IiNIy
4
t r, . fl.' I lr !.1 {,
'' ll ! rr..,.
?..
t,.
5.
6.
7-
Crcol< to Edr^rords:
Vai I Area:
Gas
#;T
_-
vy'nter & San.
AuttrcritY
\(ildli{o
i i.. \'lrr r.r;rtr \/t'1la)' Ell'c:rlc
-- =' ---
!1.('rl:':r i11r--.' '!r'r: (' I'r'':ci :1'r:"-;r: irrt")
-i - ('ja,:" '.,i!f l)' f i' oi liilil;;;';;'l:
.!'
a
l: I i.:l t ri ir
./\l I
o I
-
VAIL I]'].]'DRMOUNTAIN SUBDTVISION BLOCK
SIiDI'CH PLAN SUB}IITTAL REPORT
Sketch Plan Reguirements
Sketch Plan: The proposed subdivision is shovrn on one21x36 sheet at a scale of 1"=100:
(a) The tract boundary, lot pattern and lot acreagesare shown on the layout. The lots will be singlefanily, duples anC fourplex as tabulated on thesketch p1an.
(b) The proposed sireet systen along uith the exist-ing street pattern are shown on the sketch planlayout. The approxinate gradients are also
shcwn for the proposed streets. A typical crosssection shows the street and right of way widths.
(c) Ovmership and use of adjacent 1and is shoh'!.r onthe sketch pl-an.
(d) The soil conservation seivice soil classificationis j-ndicated on '"he sketch plan ani the tvpe ofvegetation is Cescribed on the proposei suLdrvisicr:
l ayou t.
(e) The amount of surface runoff enteri_ng the site is
.shown on the si:etch plan layout. The estinated100 year water surface from the Gore Creek floodpa1:.n report anC the 30 foot streanr set bac): Ii-neare aLso shown. A copy of the flood plain mapfrom the above report is encl_osed.
INFOR.ITIATIOi{: A leLter from the subdivider with a S25.00check requesting si:etch plan review by :he Coun;y, ispart of this submirtal.
(a) Naine of the subdivision is Vail fntermountainsul:ii vision Bl-oci,, 1C and is shov.n ou -.be Sletch
P1an.
(b) A fetter of intent from the water district is apart of this subrnittal.
IU
4. 01
4. 01. 0L
I
rr n " ---
t_ tl I
Ijl: r' i'lant:ng a
.. 1-r., i \-, -. -ii _ '
4.OL.a2
L le';ier of inteni
i.-'t--'--r. =16 tlc.r : -,:--
l;c,-rnta rn Bell- anC Publ,ic Service
- - -'.- - i t ! - I!- u!,.rr_! L !cl,l-.
E-an -'- ^I r J:.. !.: =
Gas lines are in the exi-sting roads and will be extended tothis subcivisi-on if gas Deni,its are issued. Electrie heat willbe -sec if oas pe:r,its are no: a.';a j lab1e.
-rrre covenan--s will rniicate t-h e coistr-ucti on Li::ri:ai.io:is cnr:cl-., s;'-e '*1 '"h resi_;ect tc ti:e sc:l_g a;;c geoloEy r€i_,orL.
I
-
Western Slope Gas
Company {)ne Parh Central - l5t5 Aropohoe srreel
P. O. Box 840 Denver Colorodo 8O2Ol (303) 534-1261
April l-9, 1976
Eagle Co. Dept. of Planning and Development
P.O. Box 789
Eagle, CO 81531
Attn: Mr. Br air Re: File No. SSP-66-76 - Sketch Plan
VaiI fntermountain Assoc.
Dear Mr. Blai-r :
Per our .hone conversation of Aprir !6, !976r r am sencling this letter
concerning ttre above referenced sketch pran. western is withhording any
approval of ifie plan peniling review of a new revised sketch to be completed
by ieGNA andl submitted for our inspection. ttre original sketch, as sub-
mitted, did rrot meet our approval- and it is our understanding that KKBIIA
will have a revised p1_an before Apri1 21 , !976.
Enclosed is a copy of the letter western has sent KKBNA setting forth
I{esternrs position of subdivisions that affect its pipeline.
Iltis letter should giwe you a better idea of what objectives must be rnet
in the plannirrg of a subdivis ion. that encompasses a high pressure gas rine.
I f any q..:estions arise that I can help with, p)-ease 1et me krrow.
Very truly yours ,.'') ..7 , / .r' z/ ,' // \-/ -,/r.lr'n r.4 L-A- \ul a -o1-i
Daniel L. Tekavec
Associate Right-of-h'ay Agent
DLT/Lc
+
COLORADO DEPARTMEXT OF HEALTI{
121A EAST lITH AVENUE. DENVER,COLORADO 80220. PHONE 388-6'TI
Edsard G. Dreyfue, X.D,, X.p.f,.;ExeculLvc Dir.ctor
April 15, 1976
Rrcgii,ro
APR 1 6 1976
RE: Ssp-55-76, Sketch plan, Vai I Intermountain Association
't;t. -'- -Dear Nri lilair:
The colorado Departnrent of Health has reviewed the apprication referredto above' There is insufficient information with trre'apf i i .a t i on forthe Departnrent to compl ete its review and we recommend iie eagte countyPlanning commission_tabre the p.opor"t-rnti r the folrowing informationis provided to the Departnrent bf H""itf,.
l' Source of domesti c_water suppry._ The application stated a letter ofintent from the water dirtri .tti) was enclosed, but there was nolet te r of intent enclosed.
2' There is no stetement as to where or ho"r the domest ic sewage wit be' treated' ,,e assurn it wilr be the u.E -v-s.D. and r^,e are sti Ir tryingto get an inventory of cofirnitrnents vs capaci ty for this plant. canthe County planning Commission "riist in this determination?
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application.
Very truly yours,
FOR DI RECTOR, WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION
xEin'6ft7({*,Lp :e -i rn,",Water Qual i ty Manaoeaent pl anning Section
Khu,/mb
cc: Bob S iek
Di ck Botryman
I'lr. l4i chae I S . B I ai r, Di rector
Department of planning and DeveloprrentEagle Coun tyP. 0. Box 789
Eag le, C0 81631
e
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Box 8ll
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Vail 476-5618 Eagle 328-??18 Basalt g2?.3322
13 April 1976 :''":llYiD
APR 1 { tgz6
oe!t.01
.,*,, Tiff:rl,i.,,.,.
Departrnent of Planning and DevelopmentP.O. Box 789Eagle, CO 81631
To: Mike Blair
Re: File No. ssp-66-76-sketch ptan, vair rntermountain Assoc.
--My-comments are as f ollows:
1. Lots must conform to Section 5,O8, County Subdivision Regulations. Areaseems to be in-excess of 25% slope minimum iot size,2b,0o0 sq, feet prusadditional 1,000 square feet for each percentage point above islo.
2' Who will be responsible for sewage lift pumps? Test will be required forsteep lots that are located beLow ilre sewer- tFnk rinel
3 ' Bridges cross Gore Creek shoutd be brought up to County Standards prior tofinal .approval, but not at thi.s sketch plai stage.
4. Rear and side lot easements should be rocated arong rot rines.
5' The cut and fill slopes will be excessive and should be located withinthe road right away and not wittra 1ot lines.
I'qrErik W. Edeen R.p.'S.Eagle County Environrnental Heatth
Unite
(
dS tates Department of the tenor
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Glenwood Springs Resource Area
P.O. Box 1009
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
April 12. 1976
&lichael Blair, Planning Director
Eagle County Planning Department
P.O. Box 789
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Dear Mike:
We have revi-ewed the Vail Intermountain Subdivision proposal
and have the following ccmrments:
(
In
rN TEPLY I,EFER TO
1785.2
'fi:':..':"'i'r 'rD
APR i .r i92,6
Dept. 0i f ia;irrri;s it r,,ver.
Eaglo C€unty. Colo.
(ssp-66-76)
2.
I. The road in the upper portion of the proposal will cover a
Western Slope Natural Gasline. Development along theexisting line should be coordinated with the Gas Company.
Federal laws do apply.
the Division of Wilcllife may want to obtain legal access to
Division of Wildlife lands through the upper culde-sac foradninistrative purl>oses, wildlife nanagement, etc. lltre
geology map indicates that a slope of 2O to 30t (buildable)
covers the cul-de-sac. Chances are good that the builder
would construct his/her house at the west end of the
cul-de-sac, therefore eliminating the best access poj.nt.
We would like to see a detailed geology/soils s tudy completed
on the site with specific building sites designated as suit-
able (slopes less than 20*) in the buililing applications.
4. Insure (i.e., bond) that t.lre clog/hruan proof fence is con-
structed as soon as possible to protect deer herds. Possibly,
state in the covenants that dogs are prohibitecl if the proposal
is approved.
5. Insure that the development of this area mj.nimizes visual irn-
pacts during construction (i.e., tree removal, cuts, fil1s, etc.)
stewart A. wheeler,
Area l{anager
3.
Sincerely yours,
Save Energy and You Serve America!
r'/.,o@
\Yestern S lope Gas
Compan y
-*- - -.----:-a:a-- : ,
--.--./'
April 9, 1976
Ketchum-Konke l_ -Nicke I -Au s tin
7456 l{est 5th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 90226
Ai.tention: Leroy Tobler
.8
- l515 Aropohoe Streel
Denver Colorodo 8O2Ot (303) 5g4_1261
RECEIVED
/\rl
./One Park Cenlral
P. O. Box 840
APR z f i:76
h'.t r.t r.r.-.,-
f:gle Ccrr,:,. ,
Dear Mr. Tobler :
Per our telephone conversation of April 9, L976, I am for_warding'this letter setting forth I{estern's position concerning"sketch Plan" of Vail rntermountain Developrnent subdi'ision -B1k. 10, as it affects our 4', high pressure gas li;.re.
\rrestern wirl not intentionalry discourage any subdivisionthat adjoins or encompasses our transmission facirities as longas the pror'>er coordination and pl anning is utilized, resurtingin a plan that is harmonious in form to the requirements placed
upon us as a Public Utility, with regard to operation, mainten-alce and safetv.
The criteria for implementing a harmonious plan is ttrat our
e; senent be left as open as possible with no lot I ines extencingover the ea sement.
i'Iester:n feels ttrat if lot lines were extended over the case-n:nt, even rtith special provisions set forth in tl-re sutrdivisionplat' and recr-.,:..:'cd r.;ith the Cced for each 1ot, it ,....:1:.a 1;, e iri,c,s:i -Lre to enfor-ce after a period of tinre and rvor.r ld ser: j c'-:slv affect
r.ir: access ior a:-ry reason.
Ii;esr'ei n -...'i,1. 1 not cbject to t}re use of our easc:::ctlt as ar.:''-:i:;;elt r.'i:..h l:iking-bit_i.ag i;:ai I c, )rorse paths, ;.r!.\s arid g,f lf
'-'c.ijrscs, r''r r i: ir t)-:e p,r anting of t '-ecs or shrubs at ra.;rrl-,,in- li'e -u:i1l_
:oi allcu -,1: e j::,_counding of i.-rler, building or structures, plaj-crouncs, picrric tabl.es, sprink't er systems or ::esicential- fencescver tle e:se=ent- A paraller ::oacivay i.,ri th the ;avr-d pcrt-ion enc-,i-r,,; ,o ,:--a:- -:r 'i-r-i:n 'l 0 fc-ct to c-.'._r f J_i:e .,..,'i th a i:t_\:.::L .iLa-a ex.a€.::ili::,;
qApril 9, L976 Page 2
over the remainder of our easement would be satisfactory-
Also, the depth of cover that must remain over our pipeline
should be no less than 3 feet nor more tlran 5 feet. Encl0sed is
a copy of the easement we hold on the subject property and copies
of our License Agreement form. These are to be executed by wtrom-
ever will ultimately be resPonsible for the improvements placed
upon us- once the subdivision plan is approved by aII parties
concerned, coPies of that Plan can be attached to the License Agree-
ment.
I am fooking fonvard to our meeting Tuesday, APril 13' L975
to discuss your revised pIan.
Please feel free to contact us-
whatever manner t^te can.
L{e will be glad to heIP in
,\.verY trulY Yours,\\ .nt 4n.No_*"/ kr{UlrueI-
D.eiriel L. Tekavec
Right of Way Agent
DLT/cr
Enclosure
o 978o /)aa4
Erolc Vrllcy Jr. - Sr. HlOh Sdroolgyp,sum,@tottdo
Eeel. Vllloy Elomcntary
Eagle,@,ondo
Itccoy Elamontary
Mafut,@lo|ado
Baiilo Mountah Jr. - 8r, Hlqh School
Mln?um, Cotondo
Ulntum Elemsntary
nhtum, Colondo
R€d CIllf Elemantary
Rcd Cilfi, @lortdo
Maadow Mountaln Elemontary
Mlntum, Atondo
RECEIV:-D
APR 0 6 1!i6
Dept. Ci . ::r ' '
Ergle C;rnq ' *"r'
RE: >3P -L4"- "b
p;1a,-m-
Gentlenen:
With regard to the referenced proposed developnent, .it
is thb position of the Board of Education of Eagle @unty
Sctrool District Re- 50J that no develotrments having an
inpact rpon the school systen be approved unless such
inpact has been assessed and approprl.ate provisions have
been uade for site dedLcatl.ons or in lieu palrrents aa
provided in the subdivision regulations.
Please place our Representative on the agenda at the
hearing so that we may advise you of what we consLder to
be the School District I s need caused by the. proposed
developnent.
EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE 5OI
328€321
Eagls, Colorado 81631
Oftice of the Supe ntendent
TCI: II'HE EAGLE COITNIY PLANNING COIMISSION
( EAGLE COUNTY (
Eogle, Colorodo
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
'VZ
ITEM
Bu ildinq Permit Fee
Application For
Su bd ivision
Zone Change
Conditional Use
Special Use
Building) (Zoni Subd ivision)
Total Received
All items are received for collection
no-payment of any item.
N9 1176 Bv
AMOUNT
cancelled for
$fiFAN'TJIE${B $F P&AruI{!
Castlc I'cak Rldg, 510 ltroad*'ay
2 April 1976
BE$ET$FIJIE[{g
llagle, Color ado 81631
?
I{fr A$J$
P,O. Ilox 789
Vai | | ntermountain Associates
P. O. Box 705
Vail, Colorado 81657
File No. 7c-15-75 - Zone Chanqe
The Technical Revievv Committee for Eagle County (a group of technical advisers
from various publ ic agencies) reviewed your application on 1 April 1976 and offered
the fol lowing comments and recommendations to you and the Planning Commission
for consideration of approval and use of the property:
1. That the application be tabled until May to al low sufficient time for the sketch plan
to be reviewed.
This statement r,r'ill be forwarded to the County Planning Commission and the Planning
Department for consideration by the Commission on 21 April 1976, beginning at 8:00 P.M.
lf you lrave any questions, please contact this office.
<-, a t-t\-f-,/I-) er/*\'
Steplren I'som
for: Director of Planning
sr/kt
cc: Board of County Commissiorrersl
Leroy Tobler, KKL3NA
l)llttrtlitt11|)t.pltrltn.'rr1,l},l;rttttittl]C.lrltn:issitrtt:Sttltil'isillll
lltriltlitr:1 Ol[i, ili: liuildir:i: I't'rrrri(s nnrl ] r:slrr.r-'t iorr, Zorrinr; Acirrriri,.rr.:rtir'n (iitiil) li:S.{;ljjitl
EA$tE U0tJitT$
"
. -l "'/'\ 'r
,,' .,-' .r*.:'l:-lftiTj),'']:,.-rl,tl-F\t.. .... ?..- ' ',
:r?i;'.:;.jj:t':lt ..-t:-i31: t,;:, ',"'^'{,',1i1 'l:t," :jii t';ir,:'1.i,::i:;! :.r,:i.:; ; 7.i'^-1 ;''r *'i'),
. r_;, i i;,, " {.^,,.1' !,
t r|
;, ;,, or: -;i
:rlr-i.I .):..
:.:; lt'!i' W* Woil qt,.$ nb p d- .
1j t, l', ;1 ; ;, ). ;,'.'
;
:a',r,i.:, t;. i,";." .I ,l;.' :. i'r,, i) 'i.ii ',' :,",: '-'i'-;;+;{ :.f .q.r
> U'[DilUJFfOCIg7;1',, il.
,/'/''
Int erncuntain Asfoc la tes
P.O. Box _7O5i'ai1, Cj).orado 81f,57
Gentleren:
Aprtl 1, -1976
Be Lt knomr to the Planning & Zoning Counisslon of Eagle County, Stste of
Golorado, that Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc., is the certified electric
public utility serwing the proposed Vail Interoountain DevelopnenE Subdivision,
Block 10, Eagle County, Colorado.
Be lt fur ther knor"'r that Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc., has adequate
capacity to serve the proposed developrent subject to appropriaEe contractual
arrangements between the Devei.oper and Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc.,
and sufficleot easernents along the froot and side lot 1lnes of each 1ot.
S ince rely,
BOLY CROSS ELECTRTC ASSoCIATTON, rNC.
n ?"frrn:.::1;.i',.^.-.. .:.;,,'".it.l-*:.ii:_.:r'i,;r, ji,f Y--f ir-.-,1 - J .,- -.: iNq:..l, .rn:;-,-.-: .t. )
J-3;t c'i'fN'o.lavF.', G t E Nwo o D:'S p R rN'Gsr: c o t,o irnboi.e t ob r
- iJi '- ":.-,*., ': j t *;*a\ b\.\.\';:',1.'-)1" 5r,+.'T.- .!'-: '' l''.'-.:.,:,'r..ir"L'n'l l.rl .-;:lV-r.j-' r',t+':..:'.o. ' ',-\ ' 1. 1, {2.
Ez"/,6*;
A
t' . ;a
Richard D. tsrlnkley,Chief Engineer
ErB/kb
r=r -='\
ii )! |=)'.2 U
Is*l.r-i.r;;s***u1**sil$iill,,-;
Aprll 1, 1976
Intemountain AssocLates
P.O. Box 705
Vall, Colorado 81657
Gentlemen:
Be Lt known to the Planning & Zonlng Comlssion of Eagle County, State of
Colorado, that lloly Cross Electric Association, Inc., is the certlfied electric
publlc utllity serving the proposed Vail ltrterroountain Development Subdivlsion 'Bl-ock 10, Eagle County, Colorado.
Be Lt further known that lloly Cross Electric Association, Inc.r has adequate
capacity to serve the proposed developrnent subject to appropriate contractual
arrangements behreen the Developer and Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc.,
and sufficlent easenents along the fronc and side lot lines of each lot.
Sl.acerely,
RDB/Kb
RECEIVED
APR O T 1926
0cpt. 0f l::fi;rirJ & ii;vel.
Eagle County. Cojo.
o( 06
VL INTERMouNTATN AssocrATs
OFFI€E3 MILL CREEK COUFf
P. O. Box 705
vAtL. coLoRADO tr657
at6- 5075
GET,EiAL PAi''{ER&
iOIERT E 6ARTO'{. JR.
p^vlo o^n?oN. JR.
TIMOT}IY R. GARTO
Ai'HUR M. XEX.TPN. JR.
lfaxch 30, ].976
Mr. Steve Isom
Department of PJ-anning
Eagle County
Eagle, CoLorado
Dear Steve,
I would like to change my original re-zoning request
from BMI' to Suburban Medium Density. On March 30, 1976 I
gave you 22 copLes of our sketch plan for this 15 acre area.I have enclosed.the $25.00 fee for lhe sketch plan sub-nittal .
Thank you for taking the time out to meet with us atVail fntermountain today.
Sincerely ,
..?f-
Tim Garton
l?lci:trlFb
API{ c 5 1976
DepL 0, t'li"n;:,|l1.: i: t,]t.jl,
tagto Colnty, Colo.
RC.CE.IVED
-[Voo, $.allins & @o.,
a
&or-
LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT CONSI'LTANTS
I74O Williams Street / Denve4 Colorado 80218 / Phone [303] 399-7053MAR 3 t 1916
** ",1.'i'J;11l':'"'"March 29, 1976
Mr. Michael Blair
County Planner
Eagle County
Ea91e, Colorado 81651
Re: Vail Interrnountain District
Block 10
VaiL lntermountain Develop-
nent Subdivision; contain-ing approxinately 20 lots
(48 units) just west of
Block 7.
Dear Mr. Blair:
Vail Intermountain Water District does now have the capacityto serve the above referenced proposed development.
Vail Intermountain Water District cornpleted installation of
200,000 gallons of gravity water storage early last year. Near the
end of last year, the District conpleted the drilling and instaLla-tion of operational equiprnent to another highly productive welLi andfinally, the Vail Intermountain Water District has rewired and re-built its entire operating systens so that the District is now in anexceptionally good position to continue to provide water servicethroughout the foreseeabLe future.
If you have any questions on this matter, please feel freeto contact us.
Sincere ly,
jpc / tj
Rob Garton
Vern Jaschke
Jonine Hixson
Tom Grirnshaw
A1 Flewelling
Tinothy Garton
AIN WATER DISTRICT
James P. Collins
Lyon, CoLlins 6 Co., Inc.
DISTRICT MANAGER
Antl
lrulit.,.orrnty, "or"(O
crir(r'r't(:'/r'rii *l'flilll'' +t*
(:cr'l.l il crltlotr ls l,cr<:iy rrrntlc tlrrtt n cop;' of till npttl
Fllcl]t>.wAscnlcl'(ld1||tot|)ct'.s.I1oil$,orlrnttrI;;;;;,''Wil'i',li;r)"I)il;il;;;;: t!t.rr-!,p{'con, posc$-2q-, nc Dtnt'}''crrrrv trrc ltrrtinln E /' '
.
ccrutlcr.'o st'rnrurn: /:=77- ; L-Z "' </
f lcation:; rofored to: T n';rppr iioironsffr Eoglo-tlruslr Creott to Edwords:
- 1. Colorodo Gc'olo3lcal SurveY
2. cofo. Dcpartmo.nt of Healttr l*-2' Eoglo sonltation Dls:trlct
3. colorado stoto Englncsr . ' ----43' cotoratlo Divlsion of witdlife
- -! ..^^,i ^^
4. Eagto County Suniterian ' 4' U 'S ' l:orcst Sorvico
5' Eagto Vt'llcy Tclcplrono Co'
5. Ecglc CountY F-n3ineer
.t
,. ""t"r"d"
M{n- Collcgo Disi' ?' Scl'pol District RE50J
8. U.S. Soil Conservation Service G.Applicetions ln Uppor llaglc Valloy:
g.U.S.BureeuofLandManagcment-'1.Towncf|V?intum
6. HotY Cross Elcctrlc Assrn 6. Rocl<Y Mtn. Natural Gas
10. Colorado Rivor Weter Consv' 'Dist' '
Torvn of Red Ctiff
tv' vvr''|sY- "" -- 3' Upper traglo Valtey san' Dlst'
ir ' oi"' of watcr Resources ' -e
Ottrer Dist. (none at present time)
School District RESOJ
Cololado Division of Witdltfe
U.S. Forest Servlco
Mtn. Bolt TelePhorte Co' '
Public Service Co' of Colo'.
in (ioro Valley - Vail Area:
Western S loPo Gas
Tortn of Vail
Vail Villago \'y'est Water & San'
Llons Ricjgo Watcr -
Vait Villcr3c Vy'est Firo
I
-'i'.
. {-';'. 1' Ton'n or sypsurrr
.rL-,:r' V 6. Vair rntermountain water
.:' " 2. Eoglo Courrty Airport Authority 'o-l t -'i '# j ' 7' vail sanitation Dist'- . r 3. Coloracto Divi:;ion ot Witdlifo - *--7'= ": *+ 'e/7- B' scnool District RE5oJ
U.S. Forost Scrvicc g. Coloracto Division of Wlldlife
Err3lo Verlley Telcplrono Co. Jr4t2?- -'- '2f 7 10' u's' l-oreet scrvlco
Rocky Mtn. lrlatural Gas
11. lr4trr. ticll Te-'lcphorro Co'
Sctrool District flE50J 12. Prrl,ltic Servico Co' of Colo'
Colorcrclo River Aroa:13. Ltl)i)or tirr3lo Vnllcy Son'
Sclrool District t]E50J
scl)obl Di:jtrict ll 1
US Foror;t l:t-)f vlco (Errglo)
L.t1l Forcst !icr\,lcc (M irrturn)
llrr5ylo Vtrl l<r-v'l'clcplrono Co'
0.
-"
l;.()tl\-'r Arlr'1131.t"
1.
Ytrrrr;.ltr Vul lc5' ti lr-'ctrlc
( rvl rorcr i1'prc5.'r itrtc')
C)olorr:cto l), J't. ol lliltlrwitytl '
Oolr,. 1ll.,to l:.)r'('lrt ii'' rv icct
VAIL INTERMOUNTAIN SUBDTVTSION BLOCK
SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL REPORT
Sketch PIan Reguirements
4'01'01 sketch pran: The proposed. subdivision is shown on one24x36 sheet at a scaLt of 1"=100:
10
4. 01
RECEIVED
MAR 3 0 1976
"""'di.i'Jffi: l,'f'*
(a) The tract boundary, lot pattern and 1ot acreagesare shown on the layout. The lots will be "irrgf.fanily, duplemand iourplex as tabulated on thesketch plan.
(b) The proposed street system along with the exist_ing street pattern arL shown on the sketch planlayout. The approximate gradients are also'-sho*n for the proposed stieets. A typical crosssection shows the street and right oi-w"y oriatn".
(c) Ownership and use of adjacent land is shown onthe sketch plan.
(d) The soil conservation service soil crassificationis indicated on the.sketch plan and the type ofvegetati-on is described on Lhe proposed subdivisicnlayout.
(e) fhe amount of surface runoff entering the site isshown on the sketch. plan layout. The estimatedr00 year water surface from- the Gore ireek f100dphain report. and the 30 foot stream set back lineare also shown. A copy of the flood plain mapfrom the above report is enclosed..
4'0L.02 TNFoRI'arroN: A retter from the subdivider with a $25.00checl; requesting sketch plan review by the County, ispart of this submittal .
(a) Name of the subdivision is Vail fntermountainsubdivision Block l0 and is shown on the Sketchplan.
(b) A letter of intent from the water district is apart of this submittal.
11 letter of intent frorn the Mountain Berl and public serviceCompany are also a part of this subnittal .
Gas lines are in the existing roads and wilr be extended tothis subdivision if.gas permits are issued. Erectric heat wirlbe used if gas permits aie not available
r: I L. l: .:!r .24"2..-4/--- 7-4 --
.: '. 'r .i ': ,. l. 1--:i.:i.1.
76,
tn
v<
cq(J
o,,, r^J.'oA()(ro-J L
-----t-,,r5Er-=*-,, --,-_l :_:=;*#
'21,,, ''i r ij, X{., /i1 ';,:'[7
\ iiirl 'r riitiill'lf I(
ii
i\i.,ll, , ;,i r1!rr7tl/it$l;1-;
il\"ii),r i i;r .,i,i 'f",,:i,:.i")i,;l;
)irl ; l,' :' 1 ,,if: ti Zt
"',lir ri;,,',,t i,i,'
',i$iiji iilt'f:iufl
it1;r i ,,i iii'l.ir;fu '*i,riiil;'[ijt.''
i-;- .ili i /,])iil,l, iii l,i;)\ . i i, i,l ,,',l,f l]ii'/ f
'l ,) l',,'i I I I' lillla,llrliiiiilil/ I'l,,, iii,,t,!i/lll,,t+1,$,,:l/ ,li Ii ,7'' 1,,'',C'/ll'l' i$'i' ,r;itffiMil
!
r
! ffi*r;6ry'7i
4:
x
i
\
\
\
I
!
E3
:! 'ir It; it= iirr
;:;-it i!1.tl .ti
?- n
{JPPER EAQLE,
RLiil"lr-D
tdAR 31 1976
l1a,,rur',r '! - J',"';
county' culo'
jpc/ tj
cc:J. AmatoT. GrinshawK. Richards
A. Flewel l ingltl. Cacek
Tinothy Garton
VAN.N-EY S,{NNT'AI| NON DNSTRNCT
P.O. Box 487
Minturn, Colorado 81645
March 29, L976
06PL r';l'
c,4jg
Mr. Michael Blair
County Planner
Eagle CountyEagle, Colorado 81631
Re: Block 10Vail Intermountain De-
veloprnent Subdivision ;containing approxinately
20 lots (48 units) just
west of Block 7.
Dear Mr. Blair:
Please be advi-sed that the Upper Eagle Val1ey SanitationDistrict does have the capacity to serve the above referenced pro-posed developnent.
At the present time, the District's sewer plarE is, and
has been, receiving average flows equalling less than half of theplantts designed capacity; the fornerly stated concern over sludgehandling has been resolved, with the install-ation of the new,
second digestor; and the allegations of ammonia l-inits are current-ly under review with State Health officials. We are advised thatthere apparently is some concern anong some persons within the
County, over the ability of the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation Dis-trict facilities to handle rrraster{ater treatment denands. A11 re-ports issued by this office, the operating reports of the State ofColorado, etc. etc., state quite different conclusions, and if
concerns do, in fact, exist, we would like to know what they areso that we can address thern for you.
If you have any further que gns, please feel free tocontact us
cerely
Janes P.
Di str ict Col l ins
Manager
I
t't.a
to|l 3 touilDArDx
:HGllrItlt]tG
'chen and associates, inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
06 S. ZUNI . DEIIYER, COLORADO 80223 . 303/7t14-7105
1924 EAST FfRST STREET . CASPER, WYOI|ING 12601 . 30712*2126
RECEIVED
g
MAR 3 0 1976
oept. 0f Planning & Devel'
Eagle CountY, Colo'
Ketchum-Konke | - Barrett-ll i cke | -
Austin
/4!6 West 5th Avenue
Oenver, C0 80226
Attention: Leroy Tobler.
Gentlemen:
As reguested, we have reviewed the sketch plan for the proposed
new filing, and the possible effects of the site geology on the
pr.oposed development are discussed. 0plnlons presented are based onour experience ln adjacent areas and from information available on
publ ished reg ional geologic maps. An onsite inspection was not made.
The proposed subdivision can be subdlvided into two major areas;(l) an area of gentle slopes (less than 202) adjacent to Gore Creekand, (2) areas of steep slopes along the north iacing valley side.slnce KKBIIA has cons idered flood discharges, we do not antlcipate any'unusual problems associated with the site geology in the first area.The second area wl I I require careful investigation to determlne
cons truct lon feasibllity.
lfopo-sed. Devetopment: IJe understand that the nel filing will be sub-dlvided into twenty lots which will be the sltes of single or multi-famlly structures. Two roads terminating in cul -de-saci uri | | provide
access to the proposed lots. Driveways and parking areas will be con-structed off of these roads. The development will be serviced by a
community sewer and water system, The prel iminary sketch plan for the
new fl I lng is attached.
March 23 , 1976
Subject: Engineering Geology Review of
Sketch Plan, llew Filing,
Vai I Intermountain Subdivlsion
Eagle County, Colorado
Job llo. | 3026
t'// - l'
Ketchum-Konke I -Barrett-N I cke I -Aus t I n
l{arch 23 , 1976
Page 2
slte and Geolojic lgondltion: The new flling is located on the south
ffiffik Valley about three niles west of Vall.
The lovrer portlon of the site conslsts of moderate slopes, (not
exceedlng lOt), underlain by an alluvial fan and strearn'terrace. To
the south of thls area, the val ley slde becomes very steep. Slopes here
are on the order of 507. The steep valley side is a soil covered dip
slope In, the Haroon format ion whlch consists of interbedded sandstone
and shale. The soi ls .are of glacial and col luvial orlgin. subsequent
to soil deposltlon, landslides Involving both the soi ls and the under-
lylng bedrock have occurred. l'luch of the s liding is apparently
relatively old. The original sl ide mass has been dissected by stream
eroslon in several places. l,le have observed a local ized zone of
renewed sl iding in an area adjacent to the proposed fil ing'
Geoloqlc conditions Effecting the Plopofed constluc!ion: t,le do not
of the gentler sloPe
In the lower Portlon of the slte. There appears to be suitable
buildlng sites on proposed lots 1,2,3, \,7, B and !.
There ls always an inherent risk r'rhen constructing on very steep
s lopes with an unstable history such as those underlying much of the
. prgposed filing, The risk can be minimized by careful engineering and
building location. Detailed investigations are vrarranted. Site
grading must be kept to a minimum and good surface and subsurface
drainage must be provided and maintained.
Scooe of Invest iqations for Prel iminary Plat: In order to assess thc
feasibillty of constructing on the Steep valley side and to conllrm
feasibility of constructing on the gentler slopes adjacent to Gore Creek,
we recornmend that a detai led surface geology investigation be made
prior to preliminary plat approval. The surface lnveitigatidn should
be supp lemented by a minir,rum of seven test holes. The exact number and
location of holes can best be determined afteF the surtlcial geology
investigatlon is completed. Holes drllled on the steep valley side
should extend through the overlying solls to bedrock. lf bedrocl<
conditions underlylng the site cannot be determi ned by observatlon of
surface exposure, we recommend that pedrock be cored for a rninimum of
ten feet in at least three of the test holes. The test holes should
be maintained in good order so that ground v,,ater can be periodlcally
checked. Information gathered in the test holes can be utillzed
for foundation reconmendations 1f the test holes are located in
proposed building sites. lf this is desired, then it wi ll be
'a - -..o
Ketchur-Konkel -Sarrett'N i ckel -Aust I n
l{arch 23, 1976 .
Page 3
necessary to cons truct
that drllllng can take
sondltlons, lt nay be
backholc plts.
RGI'I ; nd
Rev. By:
Enc I osure
access roads to proposed buildlng sltes so
place In these arees. Depending on subsol I
necessary to supplenrcnt some drllIing wlth
Yours truly,
cHEl{ AilD ASSoCIATES, lNC.
By
RCH
Ra I ph G .il l{ock
Eng i nee/l ng Geo log i st
DIIAnIIilttfI 0I ILAI| I{l
o
I{E AIID DEUETOTMEI{T
Castle Peak Bldg.510 Broadway
31 March 1976
P.O. Box 789 Eagle, Colorado 81631
Re: File No. Ssp-66-76 - Sketch Plan
Vail Intermountain Assoc.
Applicant: Garton Bros.
Vail lntermountain Assoc.
Vail, Colorado 81657
Enclosed herewith is acopy of an appl ication and plan submitted to the Eagle County
Planning Commission for review and recommendation at their regu lar meeting on
21 April 1976.
ln accordancewith C.R.S. 106-2-9, 106-2-33 and 106-2-34, 1963, as amended and
Eagle County Subdivision Regulations, Section 3.05 and 3.07, 1972, you are required
to receive the plan, and you have24 days from date mai ledwithinwhich to respond or
the plan will be deemed to have been approved by your agency.
The Planning Commission would sincerely appreciate your comments and
recommendations a few days prior to the meeting date. lf you desire additional
information or time, please advise this office, in writing.
Thank you very much,/e)
S . Blair
MSB/Kt
Planning Department/Planning Commission: Subdivision,
Building Official: Building Permits and Inspection, Zoning
Rezoning, Applications and Review (303) 32&6338
Adminislration (303) 328-6339
EAEII COUNTT
l
:,{"'
,;
(J'Jaih
/
\f
F.
/
oqr
^i
l:t
'.t,'
I
i
I\{T/\i
(iY \
-,fr_: '\P.R
\'
-lru:t.,<tldis
ilR
pll$-
url\Y.l \s
oi1 I
--,-..._ y€'JP
E
I
L7
il
\I,,/,
!-ir/)
t)
)t.I
o
[t
i-
I
l\
I
t