HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 1 BLOCK 1 TRACT D VAIL ASSOCIATES SKI LOCKERS IN LIONSHEAD LEGAL(}I/tJOC/C,--"*S Jr /Oe-c.,
-r/1 L I ()//J /;C'c;d
---
...••
FILE C py
11.A request foranappealofasta ff denialoftheoutdoorskistorage ,located adjacent to
the Gondola BuildingfTract 0 ,VailLionshead1stFiling.
Appellant:
Plan ner :
VailAssociates,Inc.,represented by JoeMacy
LaurenWaterto n
An n Bishopstatedshehada conversation withJimMandelwhosaidshewasbiased against
V a.i1 Associates .ShesaidshewasnotbiasedagainstVa il Associates ,butthatshewas
c oncernedthatthestru cture was constructed onthesitewithoutTOVapproval.Shesaid it was
not inher purview tolookoutforthelittleguyandsheapologizedtoMr.Man del.
Plann ing and E nviro nm ental C ommission
Minutes
Ap ril 14,1997 1 4
•
LaurenWatertongaveanoverviewofthestaf f memo.
•
GregAmsdenaskediftheapplicanthadanythingtoadd .
JimMandel.fromVailAssociates,askedwhyshouldVAbeallowedtohaveabovegroundski
storage because theUSFSpermitsitinGoldPeak ,buttheCC1doesn't.Hesaidskistorage
shouldbeallowedinaskitown.HesaidVAwouldsupportachangetothe Ordinances because
the philosophy encouragedskistorage.Hesaidit'seasiertoridethebuswhenskisareinTown.
HesaidVailhad1400skistoragespots ,with70%ofskisstored overnight wererentalsfromVA.
HeapologizedfortheGoldenPeakissue,astherewaspressuretogetthingsdone.HesaidVA
wouldmakeastructurewewouldallbeproudof.Hesaidhewishedtherewasabetterplace.
HesaidVAhadtheabilitytoappealtoCouncilifhalfofthePECwanteditontherightandhalf
ontheleft.VAwouldthenjumptothenextprocess .HesaidVAdidnotgetapprovalforthe
racksandlocksinLionshead,sincepeople didn't thinkofitasa structure .Hefelta temporary
typeof structure shouldbe dealt withorencouraged,asitwas consistent withaskitown.He
saidthiswasnotaneconomicissue;thatLionsheadwasalegalissue;notan aesthetic issue.
Hesaidtheywouldliketohavetherequestgranted ,tooverturnstaff'sdenialandbeableto
comeinto compliance andremoveanyoffendingstructures.Hesaidin1987Lionsheadand
GoldenPeakgotTownapprovalfor10wirerackstobeinstalled .Hesaidin1989 basement
storagewaspassedforCC2,sothiswas grandfathered in.Hesaidin 1995/96,wirerackswere
replacedwithskibarnsholding49skisorsnowboards .Jimsaiditwasarguableifitwasstill
grandfathered,sincethebUildingwaschangedtomakeitmoreattractivethanthewireracks.
Hesaiditheld14skiracksless ,butthatstaffdenieditbecauseitwasazoningissue .Jim
MandelsaidVAwantedtherighttogototheORBandgobacktowireracks.Hesaidstaffsaid
welostournonconformingusebecauseofthechangeinthestructure.Hefeltthereshouldbe
aboveground structures andthatskistorageshouldbeconsideredwiththeLionshead
redevelopment.Hesaidskishavetobewithinastructureandwirerackswerenota structure.
Heaskedwhatwasbelowgradeandifbelowthemaingradewasbelowgrade .Hesaidthe
storagewasalevelbelowtheGondolaBuilding .JimsaidVAwouldliketogototheORB.He
askedifbelowgradecouldbewithinamainstructureandifweweresplittinghairsonthat.He
saidto encourage higherretailuseabovegrade .
MikeMollicasaidtheLionsheadrackswereapprovedinadifferentlocat ion thantheywerein
today.
•JoeMacysaidthiswentback10yearsanditlookedlikehalftherackswereinonelocationand
t he otherhalfinanotherlocation,buttherackswereallputinonelocationatsomepointoftime.
JohnSchofieldaskedJimif,regardingtheexist ing unitsinastructure,therewasabuilding
pe rmitissuedforthatstructure.
J im Mandelsaid,no.
John Schofield askedJimifhewasfamiliar with theUBC.
Ji m Ma ndel said ,no.
Mik e Mollica saidthatin1989theTowndealtwiththeproposalofskistorageintheMillCreek
C ourtBuildingandintheCC1andCC2districts,butthatthecodewassilentwithskistorage
prior.Hesaidin1989itwasnotapproved.HesaiduseswereregulatedasdefinedintheCode.
HesaidthatskistoragewasnotanexcitinguseandCouncildesignateditintothe basement
levelonlyforthat particular use.Mikesaidwhatwasapprovedin1987mighthavebeena
P lanningandEnvironmental Commission
M inutes
April14.1997 1 5
••
mistakeonstaf f's part ,asthecodewassilent in1987.Hesaidsk i storagemighthavebeen
class ified asanaccessoryuse.Hesaid chang ing thewirerackstoastruc ture was questionable
asto whether thenon -conforming statusshouldremain .Mike saidthatstaffsaidno,itisa
changeofuse.
JimMandelsaidhewasconcernedwith grandfathering andnotgoingbacktolookatwhat
happened10yearsago .Hesaidtherackswereconsolidatedtoonesite ,butthatbothsites
were approved withtheinitial application .
GalenAaslandsa id rackswereoriginally infrontoftheChildren 's Ski SchoolandTrailsEndand
thattheywereall bytherentalshopnow.
J im MandelsaidwewouldliketogotoORBnow .
GregAmsdenaskedforanypubliccommentsandtofocusonthezon ing.
Tom Neyens agreedw ith theBoard,butrememberedtheracksbeingalotsmaller.Hesaidthey
we re inbarnsnowand didn't lookgood.Hesaidtheyheld40skisinitially,not70 .Hesuggested
movingtheselockers intothegameroomundertheoldGondola.Hesaidhe spent alotof
moneytomeetcodeandthatPepi Gramshammer dugoutspacetoputtheskistoragebelow
ground .Hesaid iftherestofushadtoputitbelowground,thensoshouldVA.
GeneUseltonaskedTomMoorheadifchangingtheracksinvalidatedthe grandfathering.
Tom Moorhead saidthatwaswhatthePEChadtodecide.Hesaidstaffhadsaidthiswasan
expansion ofalegalnonconforminguse.The1987decisiondidn'tmatter.
GregAmsdenstatedifthelocationwaschanged,youlosttherightforittobe grandfathered.He
saidtheseracksweremovedandsotheylostthat grandfathered right.Hesaidtheuseshould
beabandoned .
JohnSchofieldaskedTomforadefinitionbecauseofanexpansion.
TomMoorheadsaidSection18.64providedthatgreatersiteareashallbe deemed anew
limitation .
GalenAaslandsaidtheTowngoesbytheUBCandsomething different couldnotbe built onthe
site .
Tom Moorhead saidthissectionaddressedthe discontinuance issue.
GeneUseltonaskediftheslotswerecounted.
LaurenWate rton saidtheareawaslookedat,notthenumberofskisthatcouldbestored.
G eneUseltonaskediftherackswereupgradedtobetterracks ,doesitkillthe grandfathering.
T omMoorheadsaidthatwasforthePECtodetermine.
Gene Useltonsaidtherewasa needfor this,but weneedtoseehowtodoitwithoutviolating
the c ode.
Pl ann ing and Environmenta l Commission
M inutes
A pril 14 ,1997 16
..••
Tom Moorhead saidthe non-conforming usesection ofthecodesaidtheymaybe maintained or
repairedwithnoincreaseinsite improvement,thenonconformancecan 't beincreasedor
expanded .
John Schofield saidtheycouldnotbe completely replaced.
Susan Connelly saidthereasonbehindnonconforminguseswasthattheyweretobeeliminated
overtime.
John Schofield saidthatCouncilneededtoaddressthisissue.butthatheagreedwithJim.
HesaidtherackswererightoutsidethedoorbytheChildren 's Center .Hesaidthe consolidation
oftheracksintooneareaoracompletereplacementwasa substantial changein alteration and
sohewouldhavetogoalongwiththestaffrecommendation.He encouraged VAtogowith
competitors toget consistency.
GalenAaslandsaiditwasgoodforguestsinTown.butheagreedwithJohn.HesaidtheUBC
and Zoning Codeswereprettyclear.Hesaidthelocationwasproper,butwhatVAwasasking
forwasnotallowed.
AnnBishop abstained becauseshesaidshewasnotsuresheunderstoodtheissue.
DianeGoldensaidtheLionsheadSurveyquestionna ire saidtoexpandstorageandweneedthis.
ShesaidthePECjustdeniedundergroundparkingbecauseitwasachangeandthiswasthe
sameastheskistorage.Shesaideventhoughitwasachangeforthebetter,we couldn't
grandfather itin.
GregAmsdensaidhesidedwiththerestoftheCommission.Hesaidit conflicted withthe
current codeandhecouldn'tsupport it.Hesaidthiswasnota grandfathered scenarioandto
upholdthestaff recommendation .
GeneUseltonaskedabouttheskiracksthatheldthechildren 's skisrightinfrontof Garfinkel's
deckthatwerenotlocked.Heaskediftheywerepartofthechargeofaskilessonandsaidthat
theyweremovableracksthatweremovedinside.
MikeMollicasaidthosewouldbeanaccessoryusetotheskischool.
JimMandelaskedifskibarnscouldbeanaccessoryuse.
John Schofield madeamotiontoupholdthestaff'sdenial.
GeneUseltonsecondedthemotion.
Themotionpassedbyavoteof5-0 -2 (AnnBishopabstainedandGregMoffetrecusedhimself)
Planning and EnvirorunentalCommission
Mi nut es
Apr il 14,1997 17
•
MEMORANDUM
•ORIGINAL
TO :
FROM :
DATE :
SUBJECT:
Planningand Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
April14,1997
Anappealofastaffdenialoftheoutdoorskistorage ,located adjacent tothe
Gondola BuildingfTract D,VailLionshead1st Filing.
Appellant:
Planner :
VailAssoc iates .Inc.,representedbyJoeMacy
LaurenWaterton
I.SUBJECTPROPERTY
Theskistorageislocatedoutside theGondola Building ,at600 LionsheadMall ,Trac t D,Va il
Lionshead1stFiling .
II.STANDINGOF APPELLANT
Staff believes the appellant h asstandingtofile anappea l inthis caseasthe appellant,Vail
Associates,istheownerofthe property andoperatoroftheskistorage.
III.BACKGROUND
On February 10,1997,VailAssociates,Inc..submittedan application totheTownofVailfor
DesignReviewBoardapprovaltoallowoutdoorskistoragenearthe Gondola Build ing in
Lionshead.Uponreviewofthepermitteduseswithin Commercial CoreII,staff determined that
outdoor skistorageisnotapermittedusewithinthiszone district.Accordingto Section
18 .06.020(B)PermittedUses ,anyuselistedis determined tobeanexclus ive useofthat district
andanyusenotspec ifically permitted ,isproh ibited.In Commerc ial CoreII(CCII).zoningisalso
differentiated according tolevelofbuilding .Ausepermittedwithin thefirstlevel ,is prohibited in
otherlevels,unless specifically listedasapermittedor conditional useonotherlevels .
Indoorand outdoor skistorageislistedasapermitteduseonlywithintheSki Base/Recreation
zone district,and commercial skistorage islistedasapermittedusewithinthe basement levelof
buildings intheCCIIzonedistrict.Staffdeniedthe applicant's request because the outdoor sk i
storageusedoesnot comply withtheCCIIzoned istrict.
IV.NATUREOFTHEAPPEAL
T he appellant is appealing thestaff decision todenytheuseofskistorageinthislocation.The
appellant has indicated tha t he believes theskiracksarealegalnon -conforming use ,andshould
therefore ,beallowedtocontinue.OnOctober7,1987,Vail Associates receivedDesignRev iew
Boardapprovalfor seasonal unstr uctured metalskiracksattheLionshead Gondola Building(see
attached photo).In1989 ,the T ownapprovedaminor modification totheskiracks .In1996,the
~roW,\O F V.~
••
metalskirackswereremovedandreplacedwithplywoodsidedwoodshedswithskiracksinside
(seeattachedphoto).
In1987 ,staff determined thattheoutdoorskirackswereapermitteduse ,andarequestforski
storagewasapprovedbytheDesignReviewBoard .Becausethese unstructured .metalracks
arenotallowedunderthezoningregulationscurrentlyinplace ,thesesk i storagerackswere
considered alegal nonconforming use.Section18.64.010 (Nonconforming Sites,Uses,
Structures andSite Improvements),identifiesthe purpose ofthischapter:
"isintendedtolimitthenumberandextentofnonconformingusesand structures by
prohibiting orlimitingtheirenlargement,their reestablishment after abandonment,and
theirrestorationaftersubstantialdestruction.Whilepermitting nonconforming uses,
structures and improvements tocontinue,thischapterisintendedtolimit enlargement,
alteration,restorationorreplacementwhichwouldincreasethe discrepancy between
existingconditionsandthe development standards prescribedbythistitle ."
The appellant hasstatedthathebelievesthattherackshavenotbeen substantially changed and
therefore,remainsalegal ,nonconforming structure /use.Theoriginalapprovalin1987,
permittedatotalof10metalskiracksneartheGondolaBuilding(seeattachedphoto).Currently,
thereare14 sheds containing skistorage,closetotheGondolaBuilding .Staffdeniedthe
request because itisstaff 's opinion thattheskistoragehasbeen substantially alteredand
enlarged ,resultinginthelossofits nonconforming status.
The appellant hasalsostatedthathebelievesthattheskistorage .asexisting,isbelowgrade,
becausethefirstleveloftheGondolaBuilding is substantially belowgradeonthenorthside ,and
portionsoftheeastandwestsides.Furthermore,theappellantstatesthattheskistorageracks
arewithina structure.andaccordingly,permittedinCCII.
Staff believes thatthesk i storage isclearlyoutsidetheGondolaBuilding,andtherefore,the
gradearoundthebuildingisirrelevant.Furthermore ,shouldthisbeconsideredabuilding ,it ison
thefirstfloorofthebuilding ,andskistorageisnotpermittedonfirstfloorofabuildinginCCII.
Also,itshouldbenotedthatthesestructureswereallinstalledwithoutthe benefit ofstaff
approvalorabuildingpermit.
V.REQUIREDACTION
Uphold/Overturn/Modify thestaff'sdenialoftherequestforapprovalof outdoor skistorage .
ThePlanningand Environmental Commissionisrequiredtomakefindingsoffactin accordance
withSection18.66.030(5)shownbelow:
5.Findings .ThePlann ing andEnvironmentalCommissionshallonallappeals
makespecificfindingsoffactbaseddirectlyonthe particular evidence presented
toit.Thesefindingsoffactmustsupport conclusions thatthe standards and
conditions imposedbytherequirementsofthistitlehaveorhavenotbeenmet.
VI.STAFFRECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends thatthePlanningand Environmental Commission uphold the staff's denialof
theoutdoorskistorageandrecommendsthatthePlanningand Environmental Commission
makethefollowingfindings:
2
••
1.ThatthestandardsandconditionsimposedbytherequirementsofTitle 18
(Zoning)havenotbeenmet.
2 .Thattheskistorageusehasbeensubstantiallyalteredandenlargedandisno
longeralegalnonconforminguse.
3.Thatthe installationof thesestructures isinviolationofthezoningcode.
F :\everyone\pec\memo\Skistore .4 14
3
,,
•I
,~\;\'v~1 0V\ez:W{()fjV -"1>e=C----~{/1'lq7-
~.-~~\cl LJt.e.,-tv SuY ~S,~cf DL'~
fJfo~y;vDwwd'·£tA'~1b~~~\O~o:f-e.-~~
(e~~-in C0C'lrrJ0 oydfrtt&e,.~-.p\d,CPOf~t'r \bY
0(I(,oU~<;,~~«A~
\t\t)O ~\z;\'""\Lflo 6-(v 'fUV\W0
"P'0hJ f11$0 f ohwr s~'*O<.~w.-~~,
~-h~I~)1'1'61 1::>$~"'-\,1tv ?tof?\1'"\\,.,iOf\'?Y-i~
~tJ W1 \CHv -~g~S>loh:.l ~~
--be l~iho--t-As not (A...ehaYlJv l-VJ non wn(Oym ~
~'?J:>t'so-~'fho-;/-It;;.irS tJ-.CMa'Yljt/Uv U0b·
~~,p Sl<zsttIH~~'Si-'votAJ£{~
~\~wed r':j(DU~'-Haue"fltJh+-iv j~+0 b~
2.-)4 ~~w\.Th~V\C\~ve."-~lMvcd ~cca:.
I -k\ow ~oJe;
I:~u~lCU:Lh~V)i~i::e-lOlAJ tJ~o.oI ,I!-..l ~M.ttcLr.-loc.e.k\oV\tit o-:..~J.\"V0t:-0 -{-z,l\t\t:JN-lOC£'.hovr~."i",~,So mv..,i:=<L m~__
(110M Me~-"?h:;v\M ilcl-'tt,~\.vJroJc.,~UrtY'lN\~v'.q;L'-PShU)l~
Ii 11u shade;>,--[hint'7 11ItJ IV:\vo lMqer \rOI <ttt\l~
I''-\1tl\--rCy}.Y\j'CvV'-id ~-r--rr.t~SD~VJN~e-l~.=blbiN~htU~-klbA>/!fo.M ~
!~-(~"teh ~*'"CC~L I 'S~\6 t0ctrrG";>.ft1c.oL>~VA
I'~~hoV'l W cJJ\tJ-~~l<e\'Y\Q,M~'(l-lc.~-\71 C,N'\C\XO'\6
i ,~\q,ct'\oo(.CAf¥l~V1!'bJ'-y 'C\'-tc:x:-tth'D~
':Go.\g,\A,..-f:t\D'trxwt--\<:J (!....,~avw.V\l~,0\i'b IDColtDttI.wh,d ~Lt(
I ;~~~is Vlot (l.\\uweJ.
!~.~~\r'l'~I dit"b-n+~\~~JV 0I\t \}Y'1Ae.yclz;.r-ck::-~\e.,..
I,
•
,itX ~~_~~1Y\Ws ~t'6 MUt ,~i(V\;~'vA\{.-V -~\~-'I\-ok.CL I'---
i i ~itN 'ON\QA"J I ~'+5 w v~jV
,b r-5 A-,-c~.~[eJ0 'tD Uho\t~f CQ;\{/,c1'Ylnj/vYl
I
'\iXtchtm I LACA'Ul~CIA-~~fnI,~,
.'G~-.(OG'vh 17"\~'ltWeV1~~~.~L-6--W<tJJw ~--
I'r«J hO'vl :~o h n?~110 \~~I(I(Y\£'i'I\-O
l .~V'(\:l7e,1.t\V .
!,VOt-&~6 -D -z.lAv\V\,GV'f.-jtv'-)
II
II
,I,I
Ii
i
II
II
!I
I1~
I
,!
)I
I,
I,'
I
•
Vail Associates,Inc.
•...,..:.
~..MAR 1 4 1997
.....,...................................i·J'V ..',,'V"I'i1i,r ~~',",';,:t '"•..•
\\"HI:II ....:...'
HAND DELIVERED
Ow nen dnd Oper.ltofl of
V.all.B~.ave r (reekf'Resort
.and AFfOWneiJd Mountam"'"
Ms.Susan Connelly
Director of Commun ity Development
Town of Va il
75 S.Frontage Road West
Vail ,CO 81657
March 14 ,1997
NOTICE OF APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL 2126 /97 OF VAIL ASSOCIATES,INC.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION DATED 2110/97;
DETERMINATION MADE FINAL 3/5/97
Dear Susan :
Th isletter is sent in connection with sect ion Hof the staff action Appeals Form.
DECISION BEING APPEALED
On 2/26/97,Staff denied an application by Vail Associates ,Inc.for Design Review of
ski storage facilities located on Vail Associates,Inc .property in Lionshead .The
reasons are cited in a letter from Lauren Waterton dated 2/26/97.Un der section
18.66.030 of the Town of Vai l Municipal Code,such determ inat ion became final on
3/5/97.
We respectfully disagree with the staff den ial of this app lication and appeal that
decis ion to the Planning and Env ironmental Commission pursuant to sect ion
18 .66.030.B of the Town of Vail Munic ipal Code .
REASON FOR APPEAL
On October 7,1987 ,Vail Associates,Inc ,received Design Review Board approval for
seasonal ski racks at the Lionshead Gondola Building and atother locations.Certain
1987 ORB docum ents are attached for reference and incorporated he rein .At that
time ,zoning in CCI and CCII allowed the use in the above zone districts .
Subsequently ,in 1989 ,the zoning was changed to allow for commercial ski storage
only in the basement or garden leve ls with in a structure,The basement or garden
level is that floor ofa building that is entirely or substantia lly below grade .
lJi'WOllDALPlh!
SIJ CIwl'ION SIlIPS
hll lJUHICIlU
PO Box 7'Vail,Colorado'8 1658.phone970 4765601 ..'.~
••
Please be aware that the Lionshead Gondo la Building has mult iple grade leve ls.In
fact the level containing the existing sk i storage is entirely or substantially below
grades on the east ,north and west sides of the building .Additiona lly,we contend that
the existing ski storage racks are within a structure and ,therefo re ,are a permitted use
under the cu rrent CCII zon ing .
In the alternative,if the PEC disag rees with the above interpretation ,our position is
that the existing ski storage isa legal non -conform ing use under Chapter 18.64 of the
Town of Vail Municipal Code .The wintertime use of sk i racks on this site has
continued each ski seas on since approved in 1987 .Further ,as itis unclear prec ise ly
what area the sk i racks occupiedwhen the zon ing code was am ended in 1989 ,we
cont end th at th e Staff has improperly and arb itrarily det erm ined th e cur re nt ski racks
to have been enlarged.
Regarding the zon ing change in 1989 which addressed commercial ski storage in CCI
&CCII ,we obviously find this animportant matter and would have opposed any code
change had we been aware ofitat the time .Ou ts ide sk i storage is common at sk i
areas ,including Win ter Park ,Keystone ,Va il,Beaver Creek and Arrowhead ,to name a
few examples .
In summary,we bel ieve Staff is in erro r regarding its conclus ion that the Vai l
Associates 'sk i storage facilities in Lionshead are in viola tion of the zoning co de as
stated in letters to me dated 12130/96 and 2/26 /97 .
Ple ase let me know when we can discuss th isappeal with the PEC .
Sincerely ,
attac hments :
(1)Appeals Form dated 3/14/97
(2)ORB approval dated 1017187
(3)ORB agenda form dated 10171 87
cc:Jim Mandel,Lauren Waterton ,Tom Moorhead ,Chris Ryman
'">.J
,,•
s kira cks approved In 198 7
..
existing ski storage
l \~t;Wtt~[f)j\f(G &;1\~D #hoc
0110 LlOV\SlAcad Ctrcle:
Wi \)[0 g/0Gi
••••
1ra+op!>CtMdo AChO C..
L[-l/JO E.ll D~~~C\d ur {l ~
Vtt\\)Co .~llf0{
LtOV\0V\ead krc1JJJ~
woe?N·f(I7vl+tt3-t RJ .
\JO't 0 Co 0001
lDoqe [tt b01t101MJ
3?;tj E.Ltdv\s\t\~c<rele
Veti l)Co.15l(f0l
Lltivv;~~ar(;l.odq e)CDrferCV\lh ew.kr
0fpo'lv ,Lt(11!l0Vlratt FlaG{;
VOl\)Co 0J!J07
•..•
l \f~~QV\S(C01t\JD V\MV\i lit VV\~
G0S E.Lt0Vl0 ~oet Ct rc l~
VtAl\j Co 2\(007
MoV\i 0 tAlj1)f,(o~I \N ,LliJvls~oJ urc~
\fo'\~J CO c;A0C;,
.LLA v0 Ma r ~Cowl D A!hDC
(p l 0 \]V.LU5l;\s\t\Qad 100 l\
\10\\)[0.1)wr:.57
...••
Vail Associates,Inc..........................................
f1~0t 'J\1tq\WH"C\ot Va'l'L6Y\Jo /1bt;oc.
c(o peS11V\o+76Y\l2e ~Dr~-~
5Lt-g 6.frrMt~~~Rd .
VO II)Co CD1fY01
••
THISITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLICNOTICE
NOTI CE IS HEREBY GIVENthatthePlanningandEnvironmental Commission oftheTownof
Vail w i!:h olda public hea ring in accordance wit h Section 18.66.060 oftheMunicipalCodeofthe
Town of Vailon April 14,1997,at 2:00P.M.intheTownofVailMun icipal Building .In
consid e ra tion of :
A request foramaj or exterior alteration inCC1,toallowforadeck enclosure attheA &0
Building,located at286Bridge Street/Lots A,B,&C,Block5A ,Vail Village1stFiling.
Applicant:
Planner:
286BridgeStreet,Inc.,representedbyCraigSnowdon
Dominic Mauriello
Arequ est fora variance from Section 18.54.050 J2a.c.ande,Design Guidelines,toallowfor
lightfi xtures ata height of22',a luminous outputwhichexceedstheallowedma ximum andto
allowforlightfixtures without cut-off shields,located at2211 North Frontage Road/Lot 1,Block
A,Vaildas Schone 3rdFiling ,a resubdivision ofVaildasSchoneFirstFiling.
Applicant:
Planner :
West VailLodge,represented byCharlotte Young/Brian Smith
Tammie Williamson
A request forafinalrev iew ofan amended proposalforthe establishment ofSpecial
Development District #35,AustriaHaus,locatedat242EastMeadowDrive/onapartofTractC,
Block 5-0,VailVillageFirstFiling.
Applicant:
Planner:
Sonnenalp Properties,Inc.,representedbyGordonPierce
George Ruther
Arequestfora variance from Section 18.13.060 (Setbacks)toallowfora snowmeltboiler anda
snow avalanche mitigation wallinthesouthsidesetback,locatedat2049 Sunburst Dr ive/Lot 1,
VailValley4thFiling.
Applicant:
Planner :
LandonandMaryHilliard,representedbyLarryEskwith
George Ruther
Vail Associates ,represented by Joe Macy
Lauren Waterton
ppellant:
Planner:
Arequestforanappealofastaffdenialoftheoutdoorskistorage ,located adjacent tothe
Gondola BuildinglTract 0,Vail Lionshead 1stFiling.
Arequestforanappealofanadmi nistrat ive decisionregardingSection 18.64.040 (Non -
Conforming Uses),stating that private andpublic unstructured off-street parkingisa different
landusethan private and public structured off-streetvehicleparking,andtherefore,anexisting
legal non-conforming usemaynotbecontinued.
Appellant:
Planner:
Pepi Gramshammer,represented byPierce,Segerberg&Associates .
George Ruther
••
Arequestfo r aminorsubdivisionoftheLodg e Towerpa rcel,locatedat200Va il Road /Lot A ,
Block 5-C,VailVillageFirst Filing.
Appli cant:
Planner :
Lod ge Properties,Inc.,represented byJayPeter son
Dom inicM auriello
Ajointme eting w ith theDesign Review Boa rd tomake arecomm e ndation toCou ncil onthe
prio ritization of"W ishList"itemsfor theLionshead Redevelop ment Master Plan .
Appl icant:
Planne r:
TownofVail
Susan Connelly
Arequestfora minor exterio r alterationinCC1andarequestfo r as ite cove rage variance from
Section18 .24.150,toa commercial sto refront andane xpansion tothe outdoor dining deck ,in
t he RedLio n Building,located a t 304Bridge Stree t/Lots E,F,G,&H,Block5-A,Va il Village 1st
Filing .
Appl icant:
Planne r:
Landmark Comme rcial Development,representedby Morter Architects
Tammie Williamson
A request foran amendment tothe development plantoallowfor outdoor skistorage.located at
458Va il ValleyDrivelTract F ,VailVillage5thFilingandTractB,VailVillage7thFiling,
commo nly referredtoasthe Gold en PeakSk i Base.
Appl icant:
Planner :
VailAssoc iates,Inc.
LaurenWater ton
Arequestfora worksession todiscuss amajorexterior alterationinCC1 a ndaminor
subdivision,toallowforthe construction ofaparkinggarage,9 accommodation units,1
condominium andnewretailofficespaceatthe Gasthof Gramshammer ,locatedat 231E .Gore
Cree k Dr.lPart ofLotA,Block5B ,VailVillage1stFiling.
Applica nt:
Planner:
Pep i Gramshammer,representedbyPierce,Segerberg ,&Associates
George Ruther
TABLED UNTILAPRIL 28,1997
Theapplicationsa ndinfor mation aboutthepropo sa lsareavai lable forpublic inspection duringregul ar o ffice hoursin
t he projectplanner's off ice located at theTownofVailCommunity DevelopmentDep artment.75SouthFrontage
Road.
Signlanguage interpretation availableuponrequ estw ith24hour notification.Please call479-21 14 vo ice or 47 9-2356
TOOfor information.
Com munityDevelopment Departm ent
Published M arch 2 8,1997 inthe Va il Tr ail.
MAR-II-87 1 4.34 FROM .TOV-CO..,EV-OEPT o 1 0.87 111 4782452•PAGE 1/2
APPEALS FORM
REQUIRED FOR FILING AN APPEAL OFA STAFF,DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OR
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION
A.ACTIONn)EC~IONBENGAPPEALED 'Staff denial of DR B application by
Vail Associates ,Inc .dated 2 /10 /97 for Lionshead Ski Storage
f ac i.Li,t y .
B.DATE OF AcnONIDEC~ION:2/26/9 70 Became final 3 /5/9 7.
C .NAME OF BOARD OR PERSONRENDERING TIIE DECISIONrrAKING ACTION :Lauren Wa ter ton
D.NAME OF APPELLANT(S):_'_J a_-...._'_l_A_S_S_O_,",_-_ia_-"-_,-_e_5_,_I_n_c_._
Va il ,CO 8 1658MAILINGADDRESS.....·--:;P....:.c.::O:....:.-=B;;;:o~x~7_.....;.;:..=.=...:...~;::......:..=..:..-:..-_
PHYSICAL ADDRESS IN VAlL:600 Wes t Lionshead Cr .PHONE:4 79-3012
..
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF APPELLANT'S PROPERTY IN VAlL:Tra ct D,Va il L ion sh ead
1st Filing .
"
AffairsJoeMac
Vai l
E.SIGNATURE(S):~bLY:"":-----z;;#-~~~~~---------------
Page1 of 2
MAR-II-87 14,34 FROM'TOV-CO~EV-OEPT.1 0.8704782452•PAGE 2/2
F.
G.
H.
1.
Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of land?_Y_e_s___Ifyes,please providethe following information:
are y ou an adjacent property awner?Yes __no ~
Ifno,givea detailed explanation of how you arean "aggrieved oradverselyaffected person.""Aggrieved or
adversely affected person'means any person who will suffer an adverse effect toan inrertSt protected or
furthered by this title .The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with other members ofthe
community at large.butshall exceed in degree the gcnaal interest in commnnity good shared by all persons.
Vail Assoc iates,In c .is th e propert y owner and operator of
ski storage facilities in Lionshead adjacent t o th e Lio nshead
Gondola Bu ildin g.T hese fac ilities were permitted by the Town
of Vail on October 6 ,1987 .These facilitie s a re operated for
the publ ic t o eliminate the need for skiers t o carry their skis
,.ttd Lodq i,n g These fac ilitiestothebuses,parKlng sr uc u res an .
p rovidea popular guest service to Vail 's v i sitors .The public
users of these facil ities wo uld be adversely impacted if the
facilities were not made ava j lab le to them .I n addition to
Vail Associates ,Inc.being aggr ieved and a dver sely affected ,
these p ublic u sers are "aggr ieved and adversely af fected persons ."
Provide the names and addresses (both pelSOR'S mailingaddress and property's physical address iII Vail)ofall
owners ofproperty which are the subject ofthe appeal and all adjacent property owners (including properties
separated by a right-of-way,stream,or other-intervening barriers).Alsoprovide addressed and stamped envelopesfor
each property owneronthelist...
Staff h as prev iously been provided with the above l nformatlon .
On separate sheets ofpapcr,specify the precise nature ofthe appeal.Please cite specific codesectionsbaving
relevance to the action being appealed..
S~e:S &88hed letter which is incorporated herein .
Page2of2
~ign Review Action Fan
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number Date 2--;2-~-1_5...1...-_
ProjectName:UOY¥J\\'(I,.1.,%%o..:I~
BuildingName:_
ProjectDescription:~\0,'c"h'!(l j".Qvu bbM !tV IL+e,.l Q U1§"c\e,1\--9 (---e>or\o\lh..-
Owner ,Addressand Phone:----'-V --:A--'-_
Architect/Contact,Address and Phone :.\~MiUts ,\/111/A~...\"tL k c...=po -g,..:>"b '1 Vo.-J.;
_-'-(=:J):....-s<lu..<:U--"'S=1.,_
LegalDescription :Lot ~Block ~SUbdivision .!,lD!''h11\l Nt I~Zone District ~r If'
Project Street Address :(o DD LIO®hJad ~I _
Com ments:_
Board ::.staff Actio
Vote:_Motionby:_
Secondedby:_
o Approval
Disapproval (~')
o StaffApproval
Conditions:=t>e ()!eel h c a (.{e.,.,,/lc.,e ("ka .,101
TownPlanner
Date:_~---'::.....!..!:----'-L......:'----_DRBFeePre-pa id *,"z..V .00 pj
I
A PPLICATION FOR DESIG N REV)EW APPROVAL
•Ques tions ?Ca l.Plann ingS taff at 479-2 128
GENER AL INFOR,'vlATION
Th is a pplication isfo r a ny project requ iring Design Re vie w a pproval,Any projectrequiring design reviewmu st
receiveDesignReview appr oval prio r tosubmi tting for a building permit.For specifi c information.s ec the s ubm i ttal
re qu irements for the particular a pprova l t hat is requested.T he a ppl ication canno t be accept e d unti l all th e required
info rma tio niss ubmirtcd.Thepr oj ect may also needtobe rev iewedby t he Tow n Council an d/or thePlanni ng an d
Env ironmcntal Commission.Dc si ~n R eview Boar d approval ex pires o ne ye ar a fterfin al appr oval u nless a
hu ild inj;perm it is issued a nd constru ction is starred.
A.DESCRIPTIONOF THEREQUEST :Ski storage fac i li ties a t r io n 6 head
Go ndo la B 'li ldi o g
13.L OCt\T IONO FPROPOSAL:LOT :B L OCK 1FILlNG :T ract D ,Vail LH 1st F iling-='------
PHYSICAL ADD RESS:600 Lion shea d Mall
C.ZON ING :--"C,.,C_IJ.....J..I _
NA M E OFOWN ER(S}:Vail A s soc i ate s T oc,
MA ILING A DDRESS :P .O .Box 7 Vail ,CO 81658
'7 PHON E:4_7_9_-.::...3 .::...0.::,1.::,2 _
O WN ER (S)S I GNATU R I::(S):--:z:~Iii'-t·~-L./J2:..L.!,!l£':-~:::.-:::.-r..-I-/--------------
NAME OF APPLICANT :,Ioe Mt y Vail As s6ciates ,I n c.
MAI LING t\DD RESS:P O B ox 7 Vail ,CO 81 658
PHON E:4 79 -3 012-------------------
D .
G T ype OF REV IEWAND FEE:
o Ne wC onstruction -5 200
-0 Al ldilion -SSO
U iv l inor Al t era tion-S20
o C onceptual Revi ew.SO
Cons truction o f a new building.
Incl udes an y addit ion where square footage is added to any residentialo r
com mercia l build ing .
Includes m inor c hanges to bu ildings ands ite improvements .such as .
reroofin g.pai nting.window additions .landsc aping.fencesa nd reta ining
wa lls.etc .
Fo r any a pplication w herethe applicant wishes tomee t with Desig n Rev iew
Board to determi ne whet her or not theproject generally co mplies w ithth e
design gu idelines .The DRB does not vote on conceptual revie ws.
DRSfeesarc to be pa id atthe time of submittal.Later.wh enapp lying for a building permit.please identi fy
the accurate valuationoftheproject.T he T owno f Va il w illadjust thefee according to theproject valuation .
PLEASESU BMIT THIS APPLIC A TIO N,ALL SUBMITT AL RE QUrREiV1ENTS A ND THE FEETO THE
DEP ARTME NTO FCO MM UNIT Y DE VEL OP.YIE:'<T,75 SOUT H FRO NTAGE ROAD,
VAIL ,COL ORADO 81 65i .
~t=//l~i:y
ORBMeeting Date :::;.....-s:7'7
By:__---::...='---''--'--~_CK#:er 3;2."g'
';(·/0-9'7
For Offi ee Usc On ly:.,
FeePaid:1-..0
ApplicationDate :
Updated)/97 .
B UILDING MA TERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Ot her WallMaterials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
•LIST OF PROPOSED MA TERIALS
TYPEQF MA T ERIAL:
Plas ti c P an els
T -lll
Wood
Wood
Ivoo d
•
COLOR:-
Blac k
Tan
Tan
Tan
Ta n
Doors
DoorTr im
HandorDeckRails
Flues
Fla shingx
Ch imn eys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
RetainingWalls
Bar ns:
gaJ:agc
Wo od
Co ncrete
at tendan t bu i lding
l y pe.wood
o ff-w hite
Ldll
Ta n
Ta n
ExteriorLighting?"2 fl oor lig ht s -sma ll Not Col ore d
Other Pod i um and a tt end an tb u ild ingT~~a~n~_
•Pleasespecify the manufacturer'scolo r.number and attac ha small c olor chi p
..All exteriorlighting must meett heT own's LightingOrdinance18.54.050(1 ).Ifexteriorlighting is proposed.
please indicatethenumberof fixtures and locationson aseparatelighting plan.Identify eachfixture typeand provide
the heightabovegrade,lumensoutput,luminousarea.a nd attach acutsheetof the lightingfixtures .
2
~NO T APPLICA BLE
PR OPOSEDLANDSCA PING
~
PROPOSEDTREES
A ND SHRUBS:
EXIST ING TRE EST O
BE REMOVED:
BotanicalName COlllID on Name Ouantity
GRO UND COV ER
SO D
SEED
IRRIGATION
"Minimum requirements forlandscaping:dec iduous trees-2 inchcaliper
coniferoustrees·Ii feel inheight
shrubs -5gallon s
SQuare f-OQti)!:c
TYPEORMETHOD O F
EROS ION CONTROL
OTHERLANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swi mming pools,etc.)Pleasespecify.Indicate t op and
bottomelevationsof retaining walls.Maximumheightof wa lls within t hefronts etback is3 feet.Maximum height of
wallselsewhere ontheproperty is6feet.
3
•NOT APP LICABLE
UTILITY LOCATION VERI FICATlON
•
Thi s formis toverifyservice availability and locationfornew construction and s houldbc used inc onjunction
withpreparing yourutilityplan and schedulinginstallations .Thelocationand availabilityofutilities .whether
t heybemai n trunk linesor proposed lines.must beap pr oved and verified by the following utilitiesforthe
acco mpanyingsit e plan.
Au thorized Signa Uirc
U.S.Wcs t Co mmunications
1-~\O O-92 2-1 9 8 7
4 68-6860 or 949-4530
PublicServiceCompany
949-578 I
GaryHall
HolyCross Electric Assoc.
949-5892
Te d Husky/John Boyd
HeritageCablcvis ionT.V.
9 49-5530
Steve Hiall
Eag le RiverWatcr
&S anitation District "
47 6 -74l!O
Fred Haslee
•Pleasebri ng a s ite plan.floorplan.a ndel evationswhen obtaining UpperEagleValley Water &Sanitat ion
signature s .Fireno w needsmust beaddressed.
N OTES :
I .Ift heutilityverification for mhassignaturesfrom eac h o ftheutility c ompanies,andno
commentsarcmadedirectlyontheform,theTownwill presumethattherearcnoproblemsand
thedevelopmentcanproceed .
2 .Ifautilitycompany has concernswith theproposed construction,theutility represen tatives hall
not edirect lyonthe utilityverification formt hat there isa problemw hichneedsto beresolved.
Theissues houldthenbedetailedinanattachedletter to the T own ofVail.Howe ver.please
keepinmindthatitis therespon sibilityoftheutilityco mpanyandth e applicanttoresolve
identifiedproblems.
3 .The severi ficationsd onotrelie ve theco ntractorof theresponsibilitytoobtain a Public Way
PermitfromtheDepartment ofPublic Works attheTown ofVail.Utilitylocat ions must be
obtained beforedigginginanypubl ic right-of-way orcasementwithintheT own ofVail.A
b uildingpermitisnot aPublic Wav pcrmita nd mu<t bcobtained s eparately.
4
•-I.PRE-APPLICA TION CONFERENCE •
A pre-application conference witha planning staff member is strongly encouraged.No application canbe
accepted un less itis complete.Itisthe applicant's respon sibility to make an appointment withthe s taffto
determine a dditional submitta l requirements.
I I.T IME R EO UIREMENTS
TheDesign Review Board meets onthe 1stand3rd Wednesdays of each month .A complete application
forma ndall accompanyingmaterial mu st beac cepted by the CommunityDeve lopment Department a
minimum of threeandaha lf(31/2)w eeks prior to the dat eof theORBpu blic he aring.withthee x cepti on of
c onceptual reviews .
III.REVIEW CRITERIA
Your proposal willbere viewed for compliance withtheDesign Guidel ines asse t forthin Section 18.54 of the
Mun icipal Code .
IV.NOTE TO ALL APPLICANTS :
A .Ifa property is located ina mapped hazardarea(i .c,snow avalanche,rockfall ,floodplain.debris
flow .wet land.etc).a hazard study mustbe submitted andthe owner musts ign an affidavit
recognizing the hazard report prior tothe issuance ofa building permit.Applicants are encouraged
to check w ith theplann ing staff prior to submittal of aORB application to determine the relationship
of the property toall mapped hazards ,
B.Ba sic Plan Sheet Format.Forall surveys.siteplans.landscape plansandothersite improvements
plans.allo f the following mustbe shown .
I.Plan sheet s ize must be 24"x36 ".Forlargeprojects.larger plansizemaybe allowed.
2.Sca le.The m inimum s ca leis I "=20'.Allplansmustbeatthe same scale.
3.Graphic bar scale.
4 .North arrow .
5.Title block.project name .project address andlegal description.
6.Indication ofplan prcparcr,address and phone number.
7.Dates of original plan preparation andall revision dates .
g.Vicinity maporlocat ion mapata scale of I"=I.000 'orlarger.
9.Sheet labelsand numbers.
10 .A border witha minimum leftside margin of 1.5".
II .Names of all adjacent roadways.
12 .Planlegend.
C.Fornew construction and addit ions ,the applicant must stake and tapethe project siteto indicate
prop ertyl ines,proposed buildings andbu ilding comers.All trees tobe removed mustbe taped.The
applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter isnot buried by snow.All site tapings
and staking must be completed prior to the day of the DRB meeting.
D.Appl icants whofai l to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and
who haveno t asked in advance that discussion ontheir item be postponed.willhave their items
removed fromtheORB agenda until such timeastheitemhasbeen republished.
E.If theORB approves the application with conditions or modifications,all conditions of approval
mustbe resolved lllim:tothe issuance of a building permit.
5
..;STAFFAPPROVAL ••
The Administrator may reviewa ndappro ve Design Reviewapplications,appr ove wi th certain modifications.
denytheapplication.ormay referthe applica tion tothe Design Review Board fordecision.All staff
approvals aresubject to final approval bytheDRB.Thefollowing types ofDesign Review applicat ions may
be staff approved:
A.Any a pplicationforanaddition toanexist ing building that is consis tent with the architectural design,
materialsandcolors ofthebuilding,andapproval hasbeenreceivedby anauthorized member of a
c ondominiumassociation,if appl icable;
B.Anyapplication tomodify anexisting buildingthat docs not significantlychangethe existing planes
of thebuildingandisgenerally consiste nt withthearchitecturaldesign.materials a ndcolor s ofthe
building.including,butnotlimitedtoexterior building finish materials(c.g.stonework.si ding.roof
materials,paint or stain.),exteriorlighting,can opiesorawnings ,fences.a ntennas.sa tellitedish es.
windows,s kylights,siding,minorcommercialfacadeimprovements ,andothersimilarmodificati ons;
C.Any applicationforsiteimprovements ormodificationsincluding,butnotlimitedto,driveway
modifications.site grading.s itewa lls,removal ormodificationsto exi stinglandscaping,installation
of accessory structures orrecreationa l facilities,
V I.AD DITIONALREVIEWAND FEES
A.Ifthisapplicationrequiresaseparatereview by anylocal.stateorFederal agency otherthanthe
Town ofVail.theapplication fcc s hallbeincreasedby S200,00.Examples ofsuchreview,may
include.but arcnot limited to:Colorado Department ofHighwayA ccessPermits.Army Corps of
Engineers 404.etc.
8 .Theappl icant shallberesponsible forpayinganypublishing feeswhicharc inexcess of 50'Vo ofthe
ap plication f cc,If,att he applicant's request,an y matterispostponed forhearing,caus ing thematter
tobere-published.t hen theentirefccforsuchre-publicationshallbepaidbythe app licant.
C.Applicationsdeemedby theCommunityDevelopmentDepartment to havedesign,landuscor other
issues whichmayhaveasignificantimpactonthecommunity may requirereviewby consultan tsin
additiontoTownstaff.Shouldadeterminationbemade by theTownstaffthatanoutsideconsultant
is n eeded.theCommunity Development Departmentmay hiretheconsultant.TheDepartment s hall
estimatethe amountofmoney neces sary topay the consultantandthisamount shallbeforwardedto
t heT own bytheappl icant atthetime offilinganapplication.Expens es incurredby theTownin
excessoftheamount forwardedbytheapplicationshallbepaidtotheTownby theapplicantwithin
30days of notification bytheTown .Anyexcessfundswill bereturnedtotheapplicantuponreview
completion.
6
•
Vail Associat es,Inc .
•
................................................................................................
Ms.Lauren Wat erton
Planner,C ommunity Devel opment D ep artment
75S.Frontage Road W est
Vail ,Colorado 81657
February 10,1997
Dear Lauren:
Per your request ,attached is the DRB application for the skistoragefacilitie s at the
Old Lionshead Gondola Building .
For your information,thesefacilitieswere approved by the DRBin1987.Originally,
the galvanized wirerackswere what was approved.With the advent of graphitc poles
etc.,the wirerackswere n o longer able toadequa tely protect equipment.
Accordingly,the skibarnswere created toaddressthis problem.There isno question
":""that theseskibarns look neater and more organized than thewireracks .
Apparently,theski barns were not submitted to the T own o fVailfor DRB approval
at the time they repla ced thewireracks .Hence,Ihave enclosed the attached DRB
application.These barns areseasonaland w ouldbeinplacefrom approximately
O ct ober 15t o M ay 15 andwouldbe removed during the summer.There are14 barns,
an attendant facilityanda podium forthe attendant.
ONnen c1nd Opercltofl of
Vail,Bea~,(fffJc-Res ort
•md Arrowhead M ountam....
Iffl WOIUtAl.1t)o!
$IlOwHlUfl1Klrs
Y"l I U A ~n Clf ll
Ihavealso atta ched ph otos foryourinf ormation andr eview .Dimensions o ft heski
barns are approxim ately 7 feethigh ,77 inch eswideand8feetdeep .The att endant
facility is 76"x 76"x 96"to theroof ov erhang.
Ple asecallme with anyqu estions.
Sincerely,
VAIL ASSOCIATES,INC.
/7tk/»rlt1
Governmental Affairs
POBox7 •Vail,Colorad o'81658 •phone 970476 5601
75SouthFrontag e Road
Vail.Colorado 81657
970 -479-2107jFax 970 -479-2157
•
MEMORANDUM
•
Offi ce of th eTown Anorney
TO :
FROM :
DATE :
RE:
VailTownCouncil
-""'Lauren Waterton ,Planner,Department ofCommun ity Development
R.ThomasMoorhead ,TownAttorney
January 16,1997
Vail Associates SkiStorageUpdate
ThepurposeofthismemoistoupdateTownCouncilonthepresentstatusoftheuseof overnight
sk i storagebyVail Associates inLionshead ,VailV illage,andGoldenPeak .
A review ofthe Community Development filesbyLaurenrevealedthatinOctober,1987Vail
Associates appliedforandreceivedapprovalforseasonalskiracksinallthree locations .The
approvalincludedskirackswithendpanelsandlights.Thisrequestwas approved bytheDesign
ReviewBoard.
InOctoberof1989 ,VailAssociatesfiledanotherORBapplicationto "replacethebadlywornmetal
roofsofthepublicskistoragerackswithshakeshingleshedroofsidentical tothoseusedin Beaver
Creekandpreviouslyapprovedforuseby "VailSk i Rental "intheVillage ."This request received
staff approval October 10,1989.
Wh ile theskiracksthatarecurrentlyinplacedonotappeartobe consistent withtheprior
approvals,therearenootherrecordsofDesignReview applications for replacement oftheski
racks .
Wearecurrentlyworkingw ith JoeMacyandJimMandeltobringeachsituationwithincompliance.
The re aredifferent considerations forGoldenPeak ,theVillage ,and Lionshead .
InregardtoGoldenPeak ,ski storage isapermittedusewithintheSki Base/Recreation zone .
However,theTOVhasnotapprovedthelocationordes ign of outdoor ski storage .
InVailVillage,theskistorage ,locatedonFederalland ,ispermitted pursuant toVA'suseofthe
FederallandforaskifacilityandisnotsubjecttoTownofVailzoningregu lations .
TheskiracksinLionsheadarebeingreviewedbothfromalocationanddesign standpoint andwill
requiresomeapproval ,either fromstaffortheDesignReviewBoard,ata minimum .
LW/RTM/aw
o RECYCU.·D PAPER
.....•
December 3I,1996
JoeMac y
Vail Associates,Inc.
POBox7
Vail,C O 81658
RE:SkistorageinLionshcad,VailVillageandGoldenPeak
DearJoe :
•
The purpose of this letter istoinformyou of several Zoning Code violations in Lionshcad,Vail
Village and Golden Peak.Thenature of the violations relatetotheski storage sheds thatVail
Associates operates.
Commercial Ski Storage isanalloweduscinthebasementlevel of a building withinthe
Commercial Core1(VailVillage)and Commercial Core2 (Lionshead)zone districts.According
to Section 18.06.020(B)Permitted Uses,anyuselistedis determined tobean exelusive use of
that district and therefore prohibitedin other zonedistricts.BecauseCCIandCCIIhas zoning by
thelevel of building,commercial skistorageisonlyallowedinthe basement andis prohibited on
any other level,or outside of any building.Section 18.24.190 alsostatesthatall businessactivity
must operated entirely withinabuilding.
The existing skistorageshedsinLionsheadandinVailVillagearc currently inviolation of
Section s 18.24.020 (Permitted Uses)and18.24.190 (Location of business activity)of theVail
MunicipalCode.Theskistorageshedsmustberemoved immediately.
In theSki BaselReereation zonedistrict (Golden Peak),ski storage isa permitted use.However,
.thenewlyerectedskistorage buildings arenotshownonthe approved development plan,nor
havetheyrece ived designreviewapproval,and therefore arecurrentlyinviolation of Sections
18.39.030 (Permitted Uses-Ski Base/Recreation)and18.54.030(Design approval)of theVail
Municipal Code.In order to continue tousctheskistorage,youmustmakean application to
amendthe development planandrequestdesignreviewapproval.
It is imperative thatyouaddressthis noncompliance immediately .Theskistoragemustbe
removedin Lionshead andtheVillageby Wednesday ,January8,1997.An application fortheski
storageatGoldenPeakmustbe received inouroffieebyW ednesday,January8,1997.Should
••
youfailto comply withthesedeadlines,wewillciteVail Associates for violations of theVail
Municipal Code.Ifyouhaveany questions,pleasecontactmeat 479-2454 .
Sincerely,
Lauren Waterton
Town Planner
cc :BobMcLaurin,TownManager
Tom Moorhead,Town Attorney
Susan Connelly,Community Development Director
Chris Ryman,Vail Associates
-\,6"PIA c -(
1j2/97
I:$"?I'M.
•
c:O'Vo........a:7'€/?""'~
I4.s,,~
•"
••
75South Frontage Road
Vail .Colorado 81657
970-479 -2107/Fax 970-479-2157
Offi ce ofth e Town Attorney
MEMORANDUM
TO :VailTownCouncil
FROM :
DATE :
R.ThomasMoorhead ,TownAttorney P~1
December 20 ,1996
RE:VailAssoci ates SkiLockersinLionshead
Counc ilman Foley inquiredastowhat ,ifany ,approvalprocesstheskilockersinLionsheadhad
beensubjectedtoorwhatapprovalshadbeenreceived.TomNeyensoftheSkiValethas
askedthesamequestionofLaurenWaterton .Sheisfollowinguponthisissue .
RTM/aw
x c:RobertW .McLa urin
SusanConnelly
LaurenWaterton ,,/'"
FromtherecordsitappearsthatVAreceivedapprovalin1987forthemetalskiracksthatare
notenclosed .WewillverifywhetherVailAssoc iates believestheprev ious approvalextendsto
thesk i lockers inquest ion.Ifitisnecessaryforanadditional processforthesesk i lockers ,VA
willbesonot ified.
Thankyou .'~S;'",(
/c ...../
I
o RF.CYCLE[)PA,PER
••
D ate ---l..--=-+-~_
Proje~pplication
Project Name:_----'.J-=l.--'----_--'----_'_____.L--'--'='--'-~:O'------>..:::=-'--------------\LI\-,s\<(~M<3>~
\
Project Description:~'S4~s\<.J..J\:!s<.,\::'A
Contact Person and Phone -:5"0-<..,f\A.k\l----------------
Owner.Address and Phone:_=-=-'---=-_
A rchitect.Address and Phone:_
Lega l Description:Lo t B lock Filing ..Zone _
c o ml :z~'t :;~,.~~':')~~::i::.:~;:t;t;
:0 IV'/&v.-'ttl f c ~(,.1)£01 -h-x 6~-rL Ci £,vJ-<.wt +:+r.vLt:"""
DesignReviewBoard
Motion by :
Seconded by:_---"-l....>..=..r...1..-_=--_
Date _
DISAPPROVAL
~-(J-\,bMt
D Staff Approvalr#r;o wnP lanner
Date:-p<+--'-t-"---f----------
Date _--'::::..l:-~_
Project Name:..,:.---'--"'--------:~~::....,~-~~='------------------
Project ,Application
Project Description:~__~--=:......2._
Contact Person and Phone
Owner ,Address a nd Phone:__----'--'-_
---
A rchitect,A ddressand Phone:
Lega l Descriptio n :Lot B lock _Filing ,Zone _
II -+'1-'>P J (
I
,,)
C om ments:---'--'--"------=------'---'------:"'-"'''-'X---,-----,---'----'-'-':.....:..----:c..----....:!:..-----=-..:..------
v
DesignReviewBoard
Date _
Motion by :
Seconded by :
APPROVAL DISAP PROVAL
I //
{
Summary:(-f-t I I -4,;,!
/1/f •~
./if"
J,0-1 f ,/,'1.-
('">:'I I~((
~
Date:/~/7
D Staff Approval
......
':)i?1)
a-t·7
C111t~/,
..=-=-I ~I Aftis '---2.-g,lh
t ~J;.,.-~(f S-/V!i-J<",.iL"7 <-1
~-fa s1.;;.<:...--~on--~P;~
~~.-d!t ..2b~
~vJJ-~sx-::~e/\-~vJ!~4/dr
!.~C""'-L AIt+-11 t /~eJ/;>
J
-,
~2!5a .S/~s (i,ib-~~~s)
-B ~£caS#(~5 ~~.
-AN A/WA /J;(£010£-By 36 t L6tJftJ
(~'~u l ,UP .,.s.
--WwL.O LIK:It TO .toeA re.liP-Xi 7":0
~1t2.~etJ'1>~Tt:bAI.uM..-()p_~~sr
(1-fZ "'F~~~'AI.s,P£.~f::~
C~'~-FA6I1J~-t1fti ~>~p .
._.~ervt?·TrI-'.~~.D.
-'A(~\4u..~:-~:>~'5 (e.~S).
I ,"
f -\tl.c.JO ~6tI U c;~r:ni--S -fLO -
I'.:_AAJ ~eteA >i~t ·CUI O£.._gY,!JI1:I'~~
.,
~(5 ~Qu 11I5i?
_W'l)tJLO uK/:'70 L&?CAr~.i./exr
.._-rt:>-nhf-'·ff;AJ d-E ~11:+£fE..$~/%
v •~',..6~_~I L it (~A11Jc..;~~AJlD .-
(I 1,'P1 I /0 /1-,'.,J'17A
/q,...)VI -Iz 'J%'R1/t'.-rH£{/tI~DtJtIIJ..>l "otZ ta ;JS ll .._~notlJ ~v{..o 'M I$L ~V~D'(~
Otr N~"--TO ~fl.lJrn SIl1P.?~t1Jtt,v (p
~'WJiU~S't ~1/6c4Sl;~4-t•.
_I-i-J L.JI\looo'~;P:-1tnJ ~C£S :(tP .~~
--rWO CA~~/>;;VDT1f~
c .•'.
__,4~~~I~io.«:l'$6 uwG,'
($~Q,,)/~
__{jjOcJc-O Li.U ·TZ>~t:>IJ
.,-.
•
III
J1It!.,t-Al.O U ~~t:.e L /t>~Lbd.:5w,(J~
LDPCe.E..-rA::..AJ cP 7/-/'L C/!..atA!-<5 at<)-ee-
$t.Jr AS CL,07L r-o r17£C/cAJSoC;:U~
~.d:J1>j?,.lj:JcncA c,r»4t,.<-ow rD
~tO~nuJrHc ./jfV(J/~()V~/ZeJ.AJ
~Jb G--A D/V~~
_/64I!.o/L CJ,a,<-4 tf:D ~S'(7 -~CJC.s)
CYJft.cA -S fh ~',~17 r I (.
_/vU /?-,(j,(J IJ~I ~X .6'"C'.
--W-Ou'-O t-o ~rte..f AJ ~~A1e LuAp61J
~~'t1nc.CuUUN r $/tC(~t:.
-.'"
:'?•
,.
....-..
•"L----i111l1fll1
/
)c
ooocccccccc
(
(
(
(
(
(
<.
(
<.
<.
{
~
I
'X
'1111111111111111111 \
11111111\\111111\1111111111 ,
.,
>-I _
l'I ',
I
!l
I Iij
I
11I1111I111111
,-
-e,,
;·i
L .,
.;-:,c,.
"
_-1-
.s >:,-...-----~"1IIIIIIIIl-------------_.-
"
--------.--------oiioiiiiii'iiiiiiiiiiijiiiiiiiii.---..-----
LION 5Q\lARf LO[)Of
~N[)CONFERENCE CENTER
660 West UonsHead Pla ce -Vail .Colorado 81657-(303)476-2281
September 29,1987
Peter Patten
Community Development
Town of Vail
75 S.Frontage Rd.
Vail,CO 81657
Re:Vail Associates Ski Storage Proposal
Dear Mr.Patten,
I have been directed by the Board of Managers of the Lion Square
Condominium Association,Inc.to oppose the placement of ski
storage units in the location immediately east of the Lion Square
"East"Building as proposed by Vail Associates.
The basis for this objection is that it is felt that placement of
these racks adjacent to the building will not only obstruct the
view corridor for certain 1st floor condominium units,but will
also detract aesthetically from the overall look of the building.
Therefore,the Board of Managers,on behalf of the Homeowners
Association,requests that the Design Review Board not approve
placement of these storage units in a location which will
obstruct view from these condominium units or detract from the
appearance of the building.tl7r;=tted,
Chris Hanen
General Manager
Lion Square Lodge and Conference Center
CH/kb
cc:Barbara Bermudez
President
Lion Square Condominium Association,Inc.
George Rauch --
Vice President
Lion Square Condominium Association,Inc.
Jay Hearst
Secretary/Treasurer
Lion Square Condominium Association,Inc.
Managed by DestinationResort Managemen~Inc.
Aspen,Maui,PalmDesert,Snowmass,Vail
..-•ProjectApplication
Date _
r I
/Project Name:...;::._~_..:=....:'__...:..__
/
/I
I
P roject Description :__'_---'----:~_~=____'__......::__'___
Contact Persona ndP hone
O wner ,A ddressa nd Phone :_
A rchitect ,Address and Phone :
Legal Descript ion :Lot Block _Filing ,Zone _
Comm ents:_
DesignReviewBoard
Date _
M otionby:
Sec onded by :
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Su mmary :_
7 1
Town Pl anner o Staff Approval
Dat e :
Ie '.-'I -It "(_
\)~-1 0 c.-r UlI I
I'"......".--cH-
l~Lit)/-<~6.6 0+_
e.;VI U+I-·r L S (<J J7r
?-cP ~/1 (f"h-<.'C lu ~~--C -h )L t -t '-~J ~l
~--tL---l-~+"h M.-~~+-,0 ~
\fv\~.,\-.'LL (/L ~~(11 L ~~\.-c-JL 1 {lh-/I I ~0 0 }
N -/JUJ;(1-41 ;
~--}-I-"",l!r l'Y\<.M-v-e..y..1"-10 +-0 ,,-_
AJ-~~.,~-
I ~.:C 0 ~blJo i-L -
I
Y --1Yt=~J1(1 n-<-~.
\
,It<"1~)d/tC---J ~1 ~v'y =-L s)Wl-t-r-;})-~L(L C/1
Cl L L L L"'-/I £~-/_
fJ'V ·J -0 J.---?,-l -iv..'~·/Lv-J'
o~~-ur £lJ.-yL .s..e:e.v.-.J'O~-
-L H 0,-sf(-..:)--0-v c.{')~~-
~0'-UV'~lJ --t~(+,r%oJI ~J~--'--
V\'-6--<-(L~j h r~-----rr-S'k-o ,-/U
~-
L1!L6-vJ -tLrU/~"'-I 7t e-,/J -h C-vI-r 10:-/L S 0 ~
J ~)u '
cr-b--'~L-rcJJ y I t<:~,A-~~f 'v--r=-~-
I(-LL--~;
rt,)ILL{-IJ,..J::-•3 ~J2 v'L-~LtA-~.
":("v'.
\~I r~f--~')r1 JJy
i-L 1 ;-.x 6"-~-k-,l ~A-~)W"'--
G -L-l/~);0/}.)I/'1
~-~~-Iu Q-lY ~l J.~~VUj t~
~-H lri-fu "~-t~-r-~~1
~rL ~LAc-jLA-l-vju ~V-V~4 f?i
lJft~---LA.ev-~-Y~
~.~_~d L s :L:
-~Okl/t.c.:«.~1 ~,LJ\-
~~~-t-r ~~tJ4.v,~xr
JJ0/~
')-~(-/{(;vovlc L ~I [.c::-~~~.~
~,t'dJL
_\c..tL hit'J.,J,~1-I/Vf -(~L rI-
Wi)u k:.~~L 1---tff y 0
')-ole ~~\)~fA )-C'P -;(~fr-~(//~1 '-'~~)
~/1!
hr1 (II-sf~cL-C ?i~'
Iv -~rw-f J;100f..~"--~M ''--+~'0(;.qv.,/
f\r1I \.w v '-I~JI &J !P
(j)G ~r G P -v.v.~L-c {~
h~I"s k-,(<D vC '"~..)"-
"-'G-'-~l<.~L.J Lid 1<;)'J _
y "-'.1 ~4~0 ~-r:lo~
s,h.r.1J I _fIr-",.I p~.J I ~Qq .{---Y\...._~~Jc--V.J:)-TJ-J -
U+k ~'70'--'1 rr7!"£L l 1i \--L !0~;
!{-)h
U~r-u
---
L?--~~~£+l~
1)---:v Qj.;-<,,-fJA-'~J~-r':T~
.i.[J c».C--u ~cf2.~o ~~YL<--f-~-------
V~-~th t":--"}61-)
G~-.J U-)
D",-_ciric-)cAl-;-;A -.,0 j
()..,.\S+"e e-:»r -',0 }~----.Iid v.-J'J-I--r
)t~~~/f--
5-0 l1v~
-...
•
...~-.!J"•.._'
~~;;J:';;'
:...
.......
...:..~:::·'~7Apre-application meetingwithaplanning staff member ,is strongly suggestedto "'"
determine if a"ii:r add ;t 'jo na1i nforma ti on is needed.No app 1i cat i ClIU'l.l 11 be accepteri ...~:ic-S.
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning adm.inistrator ).>~~~~1
It isthe applicant 's responsibility to make anappointmentwiththe staff tofind .'
out about additional submittal requirements.Please note that a COMPLETE applica-;",::~::-~f~f:
tion will streamline theapprovalprocessforyour project by decreasingthe number ..
of conditions ofapprova I that the ORB may stipulate.ALL conditions ofapprovalmust .~~
be resolved before a building permitis issued.""'~::~
A.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:6;t·(Y ·.'R"L k-K '-;V4-11 i/f(x1,1-
j
-.r I'Q~s H!Z.AD S C .::~~~
<;;-tD «cf&=(RfbLlc)~'hIe-f rLOp e>S tZ.-To fZ I'l-p 1.4-Lik-p -t fJ:.-34-vL y t--<J0(Zt-J
t1 /Z.-T..fL l?aJ FS OF "tt~?u lSLlc:..'SJ(\s ro~f2-(gd-uC~LJ(TH ?:.1-tA-K.f!...
ORB APPLICATION /
*****THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUB111TTED*****
I.PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:·
rol2-V4-IL A ~!>0 4+nL,S
;;;'~T J;!::,CJ D ~D 0S.-2/91 te 1ephone _
Address telephone_
E.NA~lE OF OWNERS:_
Signature _
Address telephone_
F.ORB FEE:The fee will bepaid at thetimea building permitis requested.
VALUATION FEE
$o-$10.000 $10.00
$10.001-$50.000 $25.00
$:.50,001 -$150,000 $50.00
$150,001-$,500,000 $100.00
$500,001-$1.000,000 $200.00
$Over $1.000,000 .$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE ORB:
1.In addition tomeeting submittal requirements,theappl icant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners.Trees that will be removed
should also be marked.This work mustbecompleted before the ORB visits the
site.
2.The review process for 'NEW BUILDI NGS willnormally involve two separate meetings
oftheDesign Review Board.soplan on at least two meetings for their ,approval.
3.People who fail toappear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who havenotaskedfora postponement will be required tobe
republished.
4.The followingitems no longer have tobe presented tothe Design Review Board.
They,however,have tobe presented tothe Zoning Administrator for approval:
a.Windows,skylights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing planeofthe building;and
b.Building additions that arenot viewed from any other lot or publicspace,
wnich have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition;and/or approval from the agent for,or manager ofa condomin ium
asscct a ti on.
5.You may be required .toconductNatural Hazard Studies onyour property.You should
checkwitha Town Planner before proceeding.
•
..a-.;J&
-~
.:-:~~
".~...,.
~.......
.--'...
."0":·::«:
~
"
..,,....
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
I.NEH C0I1STRUCTION
A.Topographic map and site plan of site containing the following (2 copies):
1.Licensed surveyor's stamo .
.-,.~.,'...=r .......;;
..;.:-..-
..-....;~.:.~
2.
.
Contour intervals ofnot more than2'unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or
more,inwhich case,5'contour intervals will be accepted.
3.
4.
Existing trees or groupsof trees having trunks with diameters of4"or more
one foot above grade.
Rack outcroppings and other sianificant natural features (large boulders,
intermittent streams,etc.).~
."~....."..-
,,"...
5.Ava lanch~areas,100 year flood plain and slopes 40%ormare,if applicable.
6.Tiesto existing benchmark,either USGS landmarkorsewer invert.
Z..Locations of the following:
___,!.Proposed surface drainage on and off site showi ng sizeandtypeof
culverts,swales,etc.
b.Exact locations of all utilities to include existing sources and pro~osed
service lines from sourcestothe structure.Utilities to include:
cable TV
Telephone
sewer
water
gas
electric
c.Property lines showing distances and bearings anda basis ofbearing
d.Proposeddrivewayswith percent slope and spot elevations
e.Alleasements
8.Existing and finished grades.
9.All existing andproposed improvements including structures,landscdaed areas,
service areas,storage areas,walks,driveways,off-street par king,loading
areas,retaining walls (with spot elevations),and other site improvements.
10.Elevations oftopofroof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath)to
determine height of building.
B.A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availability.To
be submitted with site plan.
C.Preliminary title report to accompany all submittals,to insure property ownership
-.and all.easementson property.
D.LandscapePlan (1"=20'or larger)-2 copies
.'
2.
3.
Show the loc~tion of 4"diameter o~clarger 'trees,··other·slhfud·6~.a~a-~ifi~~olants t~
are onthe slte andthe location and design ofproposedanscape areas with
the varieties andapproximate sizes of plant materials tobe planted.~
Complete landscape materials list.
Designate trees tobesavedand those tobe lost.
NOTE:As much of the above information as possible should occur onthe site plan,so that
the inter-relation of the various components is clear.The landscape planshouldbe
separate.The existing topographic and vegetational characteristics may bea separate
map.The applicant must stake the site to show lot lines and building corners.Trees
that will be lost during construction mustbe tagged.The work shouldbecompleted
before the ORB site visit.
·E .~_A r G h i te c t ur a l Plans(1/8"=I'or larger)2copies
1.Must include floor plansand all elevations asthey will appearoncompletion.
Elevations must show both existing and fin ished grades.
2.Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be specified and submitted for
reviewonthe materials list available from the Department of Co~unity Develop-
ment.Color chips,siding samples etc.,shoul d be prese nted at the Design Review
Board meeting.....
F.The Zoning Administrator and/or ORB may require thesubmissionof add itional plans,
drawings,specifications,samelesand other mater ial (includi ng a model)if deemed
necessary to determine whether-a project \~i1 1 camp ly with design guidelines.
i l.mNOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
Photosor sketches t hat clearly indicate what i sproeosed andthe location (site plan)
ofproposal may bes ubmitted in lieu ofthe more formal require ments givenabove,as
longasthey provide all important specifications for the proposedinc luding colors and
materials tobe useti ..-
r 1.ADD ITIONS -RES I0ENTI AL OR Cor·1HERC IA L
A.Original floor planswith all specifications shown
B.Floorplan for addition -2copies
C.Site plan 'showing existing andproposed construction -2 cop ies tapas
D.Elevations of addition
E.Photosof existing structure
F.Specifications for all materials and color samples on materials list available at
Depart~ent of Community Development
At the request ofthe Design Review Administrator you may also be required to subm it:
G.Statement fro m each utility verifying l ocation of service and availability.See
attached utility location verification form .
.H.Site improvement survey,stamped by registered professional surveyor.
I.Pre li minary title report,verifying owners hip of property and lists ofease ments.
IV.FINAL SITE PLAN
After abui lding permit has been issued,and when t heproject is underwa y,the following
will be required before any building receives aframing i nspection from theBuilding
Department:A certified improvement surveyshowing:
A.Building locations with ties to property corners,i.e.distances and angles.
B.Building dimensionsto nearest tenth of foot.
C.All utility service lines as-builts shewing size of lines,typeof material used,
and exact locations.2 copies
D.Drainage as-bui1ts.2 copies
E.Basis 'of bearing to tie to section corner.
F.All property pins are tobe either found or ·set and stated on map .
"
.-:-,:J
.'.~.........-....
G.Alleasements •
H.~uilding floor elevations and roof ridge elevations.
lIST OF ~~TERIAlS
~ME 'OF p~OJECT:
lEGAL DESCRIPTIOiI:lOT BLOCK FiLING
STREET ADDRESS:--------------
DESCR IPTION OF PROJECT:.~".'...,.......
The following i nform ation is re~uired for submittal bythe applicant tothe Design Review
Board before a final approval can befiven:
A.BUILDING i·IATEIAlS:TYPE OF r·1ATERI Al
Roof
Siding
Ot herWall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windo vvs
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
TrashEnclosures
Greenhouses
Other
B.lANDSCAPI NG:Name ofDesigner:
phone:
PLANT r~TERIAlS:Botanical Name
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO _
BE REi-lOVED
Common Name Quanitv
COLOR
Size*
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height for conifers.
(over)
:,..-
.,~.....,§
..-.z ...
.PLAtH ~'ATERIALS:Botanical Name
(con't)
SHRUBS
.EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REHO VED
cno uno COVE RS
SOD
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIG;"iION
Corrrnon Nam e Quani t'f Size
••..••I ·........~
,'.
Sauare Footaae
TYPE OR METHOD OFEROSIONCONTROL ---------------------
C.OTHER 'LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls,fences,swimming pools,etc.)Please specify.
;"
·.
ZO:-JE CH ECK
FOR
SFR,R,R PIS ZO NE DIST RIC TS
DATE:
LEG.;L ~D E""'S:-;;C~R"I P;-:;T"'I~Oi"'~:-;-L=-:ot~Block Fil i ng,_
ADDRESS :----------
mmER Phone_
AR CHITECT Phone,___
ZONE DI STR I CT _
PRO POSEDUSE
LOT..SJZE ...._._
Heig ht
Tota l GRFA
Pr imary GR FA
Secondary GR FA
Setbacks:Front
Sides
Rear
Water Cour se
Site Coverage
La ndscaping
Fe nc e/Re taining Wall Hei ghts
Par king
Credits:Garage
Mec hanical
Air lock
Stora ge
So lar Heat
A11 0\'/ed
(30)(3 3)
20 '
I S'
IS'
(30)(5 0)
(30 0)(600)
(900 )(1 200)
(50 )(l 00)
(25 )(50)
(200 )(400)
ProDosed
Dr ive:SlopePermitted Slop eActual
Envi ronment a l/Ha zards:Ava 1anche _
Flood Plain _
Slope _
Wetlands _
Geologic Hazards _
Co mm ents:_
Zoning :Approved/Disapproved
Date:
Sta ff Signature
UTILITY LOCATI O::VERI?ICATIO:1
SUBDIVISION'_
JOB NAJ-IE,_
LOT BLOCK FILI~G,_
ADDRESS _
The location of utilities,whether they be main trunk l ines or proposed lines,
must be approved and verified by the fo llowing utilities f or the acco~panying
site plan.
Mountain Bell
468-6500
Wes te rn Slo peGasCo.
180 092 2-1987
Harry Moyes
Publi cSe rviceCompany
94 9-5781
Gar y Hall
Holy Cross Electirc Assoc.
949-5892
TedHus ky/Mic hae l Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.V.
9 49-5530
Gar y Johnson
Upper Eag le Valley Water &
San itat ion Distr ict
4 76-7480
Fred Haslee
Authori=ed Si gnature Date
NOTE:These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his responsibilit y
to obtain a street cut p e rc it from the Town of Va il.Departmen t o f Public
Wor ks and to obta in utility locations before digg ing in any public right-
of-way or easement in t he Town of Vail.A buil cing pe ro it i s n ot a stre et
cut p ermit.A street cut per~it must be obtai ned separately.
This form is to verify service availability and location.
This should be used in conjunction with preparing your
utility plan and scheduling installat ions.
*(Please bring a site plan when obtaining Upper Eagle Valley Water
&Sanitation signatures)
"J'
17~I o~~
P .O .Box3170•Winter Park.Colorado 80482•(303)726 -5461
Tim Koepke
P.o.Box3170 .Winter Park.CO 80482 ·(303)72fi·5461
--------------
,,I4\0
)fl.'--+-----j
,.I
--I"LrP
.)I"lo\ft fulCilh.
Stt...
V.hN~~i'_
t>l~
C.-\
I
I
't I-I
1
I I
I'
rb
11
f 40"
-'.....----..---.
;:::=:
4-'~'II
Z'l,l
I
I
~'
-
f-----
1 ~----1
1
I
24""1---11:-
3 f.,"
1
ri '
"},,....----r-'
L _
(51.1:Il-t)
-:;t -
r