HomeMy WebLinkAboutCROSSVIEW AT VAIL GENERAL LEGAL,'
FILE COPY
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.vailgov.com
Sally Jackle, Attomey at Law
1672 Matterhom Circle
Vial, CO 81658
Re: Crossview and Vail GRFA availability/Tracts B-1 and B-2, The Valley Phase ll
June 4, 2005
Ms. Jackle
This letter is being sent to inform you of my findings regarding the availability of Gross Residential Floor Area
(GRFA) for the project known as Crossview at Vail which is zoned Special Development District (SDD) No. 29,
The Valley Phase ll, with an underlying zoning of Residential Cluster. From the set of plans you provided to
me I was able to determine the amount of GRFA which exists on the site for all seven (7) units under the
regulations governing GRFA established by Ordinance 14, Series of 2004. GRFA was determined to be as
follows and includes the addition of each floor plates area, vaulted areas over 15 feet 11 inches, and areas
deducted which are below grade for each unit.
Unit A
Unit B
Unit C
Unit D
Unit E
Unit F
Unit G
Total 15,111 s.f.
The requirements of SDD No. 29 limit Units A-G to '13,623 square feet. The existing Units A-G exceeds this
limit by 1,488 square feet. Therefore all avaibble GRFA has be utilized and the units are eligible to utilize the
250 Addition and interior conversion provisions of the Code as the property has an underlying zoning of
Residential Cluster.
The set of plans utilized to perform this analysis has been placed within the Community Development archives
to serve as the official record of the GRFA analysis performed by staff and is dated June 4, 2005.
Please review these comments and if you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at 970-
479-214. This letter will be placed within the legal file maintained at the Community Development
Department in order to serve as record of the GRFA availability for Crossview at Vail.
2,082s.|.
2,115 s.f.
2,051 s.f.
2,100 s.f,
1,937 s.f,
2,409 s.f.
2417 s.f.
Cc: Fib
{p ^t"r.r"o r *"
,,.i"U, A. Jackle
Attom€y at l.aw
I 672 lvlatterhqn Circle
PO Box 70
Vail, CO 81658
Menber Colqado,
I&inois & New Yo* Bars
June 2, 2005
BYHANDDELIVERY
Mr. Warren Campbell, AICP
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
75 SouthFrontageRoad
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Lot F, Crossview at Vail, 1460F Buffehr Creek Road, Vail
Patio Enclosure-Addition of 250 Square feet of GRFA
Tel: 970476-1300
888476-1300
Fax: Y10476.4494
E-mail jacaro@vail.net
Dear Warren:
Pursuant to our recent discussions, here are the plans for all ofthe homes in the Crossview
development. Also, here are some photographs ofthe homes.
I understand that you will use these plans to make the preliminary analysis we discussed of the
GRFA for the Crossview development as a whole, and, in particular, to determine if there is any
remaining available GRFA at the project.
I also understand that you rnay need further information to make the GRFA analysis, but that you
believe you can at least make a good start on the analysis with these plans.
if you need additional information, please let me know and I will do my best to get it forWarren,
you.
JU,u 't 't. ,
fov-C0ttt.il;,^
c: John Madden
Gttem:cu)
Design Review Board
ACTION FORH
DeparUnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2{52
web: www.vailgov.comoortt'fft €tEuttEt{t
Project Namer CROSSVIEW @ VAIL TREES
Protect Description:
Proled Address:
Legal Descdption:
Parcel Number:
Comments:
DRB Number: DR8050281
RNAL APPROVAL FOR THE REMOVAL OF 4 PINES KILLED BY PINE BEETLE BETWEEN UNITS'D'
&'E'
Pafticlpants:
OWNER CROSSVIEIA' AT VAIL HOMEOWNERSOilOSIaOO6
C]/O DAN MCNEILL
PO BOX,1694
VAIL
co 81658
APPUCANT CROSSVIEW AT VAIL HOMEOWNERSOil 0512006
C]/O DAN MCNEILL
PO BOX,f694
VAIL
co 81658
1460 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL Location: 1460 BUFFEHR CREEK RD
loE Blodc Subdivislon: CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
2103-122-1200-5
SEE CONDItrONS
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Gonditions:
BOARD/STAFF ACIION
Acdon: SrAFFAPR
Date of APProval= O7lt3l2AO6
Cond:8
(P[AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(Pl3N): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
@nd:201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approral.
@nd:202
Approval of this project shall lape and become vold one (1) year folloadng the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced
and is diligently pursued brrrard compleUon.
J.
' t-i _'' ,.t
Planner: Joe Suther one Fe.?"iar l2o.oo
(Duinor Exterior Alterati0s
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 Souft Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557
tel: 97 0.479.2L28 tax.. 970'479.2452
web: www.\,ail9o/,com
General Information:
All projects requiring design rodew must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application.
-Please
refdr t6 Ue submittat requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted untii all required information is received by the Community Development Department' The
project may also need to be rwiewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
beiign r€irie* approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences withln
one year of tfie apProval.
f ,{€s llllJeDescription of the Requestz fL€A
Pt *t€ BeA=-ts. t
Location of the Proposaf: Lot-Bfock:- subdivision:LK.csSvrt;at At v4 rz-
Physical Address:
ParelNo,zdl
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):o\. e*-n--V, BJ \-A-Mailing Address:
Owner(s) Signature(s)
Name of Applicant:
0I
B
oI,
@
^
!o^@_
at 970-328-8640 for Parcel no.)
Mailing Address:
Type of Review and Fee:
tr. Signs
tr Conceptual Review
El New Crnstructiontr MdiUon
tr Minor Alteration
(multi-family/commercial)
Minor Alterauon
(single-family/d uplex)
Changes to Approved Plans
Phone:
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
+r
ax:
$5s0
$300
$2s0
For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (inctudes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenB, such as,
re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For minor dtanges to buildings and site impro/ements, $idl as,
re-roofing, painting, window addibons, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
No fueX-Sepasetion4.qu.*
$ry-j'.
' .' rt-
l,:
IIIIItr-t
DESIGN BEVIEW BOARD AGENDA
APRTL 5, 1995
3:00 P.M.
PROJECT ORIENTATION
SITE VISITS
1. Hansen - 775 Potato patch Drive2. Babbit - 1853 Lionsridge Loop3. Dauphinais - 1874 Glacier Court4. Erickson - 1987 Circle Dr5. Phillips - 2696 Davos Trail6. Sumpter - 1722GenevaDr7. The Ruins - 1325 Westhaven Dr8. Brown - 1239 Westhaven Cr9. Alpine Standard - 28 S Frontage Rd. 10. Riva Ridge North - 133 VailRoad11. Mont De Neige Holdings Ltd. - 3025 Booth Falls Road12. Levy - 4819 East Meadow Drive
Drivers: George and Randy
10:30 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
1. Savoy Villas - Changes to previously approved plans. JC
1 100 N Frontage Road/Savoy Villas
Applicant: Walid Said
MOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRAINERD VOTE: 5-0
Approved with conditions.
1. The posts on the west will be 8"x8", or 8" round painted wfod stucco finish is
concrete.2. Add white band under bedroom popout.
2. Lauterbach - New single family residence. JC
4403 Bighorn Road/Lot 3, Block 3, Bighorn 3rd Addition.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
MOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRAINERD VOTE: 5-O
Approved with conditions.
1. Move hammerhead to satisfy Public Works.2. Move landscaping around hammerhead.3. Window trim to be applied to West elevation front portion of building.
4. Bury the overhead lines along Bighorn road by T.C.O.
5. Provide staff with color chips.
(i\/
"0
3. Lion Square Lodge - Building repaint. JC
660 W Lionshead Plc./Lot 1 , Vail Lionshead 1st filing, 1 st additionApplicant: Bill Pierce for Lion Square Lodge HOAMOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRAINERD VOTE: 5-0
Approved with conditions.
1. Replace deteriorating wood.2. Should the applicant decide to hold off painting Building #1 this summer, the applicant
will provide staff with a bond tor 1251o of the actuat value for the work no later than
September 1, 1995.
4. Johnson - Demo/Rebuild of single family residence with
Type ll EHU and 250 GRFA ailotment. RS
1 1 95 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 14, Btock 6, Vait Viilage 't st Fiting.
Applicant: George and Susan JohnsonMOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRATNERD VOTE: 5-0
Approved wlth conditon garage to house connection must be GRFA.
5. Rabbit Development - Remodet and addition. RS
1853 Lionsridge LoopiLot 3, Block 3, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing #3.
Applicant Michael Sanner for Rabbit DevelopmentMOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRATNERD VOTE: 5-0
Approved with conditions.
1. Rockfall Hazard report must be submitted. ll report requires mltigation, exterior
changes to unit must come back to DRB.
6. Serrano's - Redevelopment of the Serrano's site. AK
298 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot C, Btock 2, Vait Vitlage 1st Filing
Applicant: Margretta Parks, represented by Glenn M. Heelen
MOTION: BORNE SECOND: WOLDRICH VOTE: 5-0 .
Approved with conditions.
7. Brown - New primary/secondary residence. GR
1239 Westhaven Circle/Lot 37, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Daryl and Kimberley BrownMOTION: BORNE SECOND: WOLDRICH VOTE: 4-O-1
z
tt"
.( ,,,,
:J
@
Approved with conditions.
)
MOTION:
Crossview - Final review of seven new single family residences.The Valley Subdivision.
Applicant: Randy HodgesMOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRATNERD VOTE:
Approved with conditions.
l3g g!1 ailtvt-os etey - New prim arylsecondary residence.
1874 Glacier CourUlot 22, Btock d, tionsriOg6 Fiting #3.Applicant: patrick DauphinaisMOTION: BORNE SECOND: MOFFET VOTE:
Approved with conditions.
Flig!r^* - Review or garage change.
1987 Circle Drive/Lot 26, Buffehr dreekApplicant; Jeannine Erickson
GR
9.
10,
5-0
5-0
GR
LW
SECOND:VOTE:
LW
LW12.
Conceptual review - no vole taken.
11. Phillips - Garage addition.
2696 Davos Trail/Lot 6, Btock C, Vait RidgeAppticant: Mike PhiilipsMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Tabled to Aprit 19, 1995.
Verbatim Booksellers - New sign.
452 E Lionshead Cr./Lot 6, Block 1 , Vail Lionshead 1st Filing (Treefops)Applicant: Suzy BruceMOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRATNERD VOTE: 5_0
Gonsent approved.
Beringause - Convert existing crawl space to living space using a 250
additional GRFA allotment.
1 190 Casolar Drive/Lot 6, Casolar Vail SuMivision.
Applicant: Eric Beringause
MOTION: BORNE SECOND: BRATNERD VOTE: S-0
Gosent approved.
LW13.
!
,9
_as
i?'i,i,1,i,i;'if',f;il'"":f Zi',,:,',loZ,,^*.
TIIIS DEED, Mr& rhtr
bclli,rcn
SPECTAL WARRANTY DEED
dry of
PROPERTIES, t.,TD, A'COI,ORADO
@ pmn F. Krrn
P.O. m( 2651
IAIL, qlnA,rl 81650
Coonlyol. EA6LE
I'
;,
County ol
" cRossvrnd
of thc
, St|tc of Colorldo, Enato(r), rnd
H,rtun cnElx mfr.rruEi, f,,ID., A CIrnAm IJMITU) pARIt@Smp
rlnrc lcjrl rddrcsr lr
tl
ofF
WITI{ESSETll, Thrl thc Bnnto(r}, for rnd In consldcntlon of rhc run of
,; tr!f[{ E[IAt{t eli|) OnrER GED AIO lAIfnEA OSIDERI{IIOG|*I*
thorctlpl rnd sulllclcncy ofwhich h hcrcby ocknrlwlcrlgcd. ha g
bu3rln, rcll, conwy ind conlirm, rr o tlr gontcc(s), ghq[g
l[ rny. rlturtc, lying rnd bcing In thc
dcrritcd g follom:
.. A 9/10 UNDIVIDED INTEREST
r DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT UA"
i,\
dro krwn by rtrccl rd mmhc. Ni
TOGEfllEn wlth rll and rlngulrr'thc hcnrlitrmcntr rnd rppu,tcnrmcl lhcrcto bclonElng, ot In rnywlrc rypcdrlnlnS, .nd lhc rcvrnlolt rld
rcnhnt. nmrinlct tnl nmlndcrr, rc r, l$ucr rnd pm0ts thcaofl rnd rll thc crtrtc, ri8ht. lillc, lolcait, cldm rrd &mrnd rhrtroctr ol thc
fmlor(rf, clthcr In hw or cquity. o( in rnd to thc rbrm hurgnlncd prcmisca, wilh lhc hcr€ditrmcnlr rnd lpporlcmnccsl
TO IIAVE ANI) 1'0 ll()l,lt thc rrld pnrnl*cs nlxrc burgulnctt rnd rlcrcribcrl with tlrc appurt nrncg, onlo lhc Srrntcc(r), IHEIIR hcln rad
udgnr forertr. Thc !r.otod3). formEl{ rcl V6,
ll{Et rhrll rnrl will WARRANT AND rOREVUR DEFEND tlrc nbr)vc.bnrgnincr.l pnnrlscr in tftc quict rnd pmcrblc Jnsscssion of thc trrnlcc(rl'
lllglR hcht rnd Nsigns, r3ninst rll rnd cwry ;rcrson or pcrsons clninring thc wholc or rny prtl lhcrEof, by' lhmo8h or undcr lhc Snnto(r).
lN WnNESS wllUREoR thc gnnto(rf hnS
f]GJOF2
coL0RAr.
'' County of EpGLE
IN AND TO THE REAL PROPERTY
ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
I{EL,ooc
tJ - OtJ. tJtJ
LIMITED P
. Stetc of Colondo, gnntcc(s):
DOU.^RS,
granlcd, h0rg,rincd, sold rnd convcpd. rnd by thcrc prercnlrdo 96 3nal,
hcirs rnd nssignr forcw, rll tlr rrl prcprty, logcthc] with lnpnwcnranrl
, St G ol Colondo,
ec)
ts
P
hcirs and pcrsonrl rcpr€scntatlws o( lucccsron. doEi covcltrnt lid r3lea lhrl
crccotcd lhis dccd rm lhc dnlr sct forth rb(w,
cn06svlD{PRFEMIEI, I'ID.,
vE{nnE Il€.1 -GENERA[., PARITB
Q-uyor
crplrcr llY CofimbCoo
STATE OF COLoRADO
. Countt of
Thc lortgolry lnrtruncnl * rclnowlcdgcd bcforc mc thls
t
'lf ln Dcnu. In*rr'Clly rnd."
il
CROSSVIEW PROPERTIES, LTD., BY CINNAI.{ON
PARTNAR BY ROBERT M. UL,LI'{ANN, PRESIDENT
rcR AEOITICNN. NI[R8g
lfo. tl.Intls. ttrcl^L l trArfiv Dt?D unralfJ trNrrNi., rarr w, irh Ai,.ll.{di. c! lolt. -(rol lrt'ato
l-34
Witncts my hrnd lnd ofncftffi p,r515
,-r'@
a raro'r38Q
,*.'oEXHIBIT 'tAN
"I.,EGAL DESCRIPTION
4690?9 8-572 F-9J2 O2/J4,/92 J7:00
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
That part of Tract 8, "Phase rr, Tract A and Tract 8", according to th'e 6escription onpage B-l of Exhibit I of the Planned unit Development pran an<t Declaration otProtective covenants recorded in Book 300 at page ?ig in the office of the nagrgCounty, CoJ.orado, CIerk anrl necorOei,
-aescribed
as follors:
Deginningat a point o1ll" sou!!9rlfright-of_ray line of L,ion,s Ridge L,oop, accorilingto tbe map of Lion,s Rid_ge subrlivi-sioli, Filing l{o. 2 recorded in the ottice of tDeEagle county, colorado, clerk and n""o.alr, vhence the nortb 1/4 corner 0f gection lz,Tovnship 5 South, Range 81 Hest of ttre sixttr principal lleridian bears l{52014.30.83{{'{6 feet distant:-.t:il-l"iot oi-l-.sinning also being the nortbeasterly corner ofEastern Valley Condoniniuns _ phase 2A- one, the conrtoni-nium ltap of thicb is recordedin the office of the,Eagle counti,-coroiado. crerk ana necoraer; therce, rleparting theeasterly line of said^Eastern.vall.y Condoniniuns _ phase ZA one, the folloving trocourses arons saiil southerlv right-oi-vay rine: trt roo.iz;os;;e zt-joi'ii*l^i",'i'uo.o,feet along the arc of_a curvel-o t.rre right, having a radius ot 541 .29 feet, a centralangle of 17.,00'32", and a cbord vnich le"ars N74042'20"8 160.10 feet; tbence, departingsaid-goutherly right-of-ray line, tte iotroving four "*** arong the centerline ofa pedestrian aceesa easenent described'in the itocument recoriled in Book 325 at page ?g6in the office of the Eagle_county, cotoiiAo, Clerk and necoider: (1) s15o49,34"U 31.0gteet; (2) S06o53'20'E 41.S0 feeii tfl- SfO"fO'46',H 64.31 feet; (4) S33o40.{7^t 25.44teet to the easterlv line of Grouse Glen at vail condominiums, aceording to the napthereof recorded in- the ofiiee of'ti""'nugi. County, Colorailo, Clerk and Recoriler;thence the folloving, three courses along the easterly and northerty Iines of saidGrouse Glen at VaiI Condominiurur- tfl^ibbooo,:S"r 13.68 feet; (2) s89o5l ,Zs*1 I0.61feet; (3) s5lol2'42"rf J5.90 feet to the easterly rine "t
-Jiia E""t*; "varley
conilominiuns - Phase 2A.one;-thence, cleparting the northerly line of said Grouse Glenat vail condominium", !!t" folloning thrle courses along saiil easterly line of EasternValley Condominiuns - Phase 2A Onei (ri lgt"s:'31.il 52:00 feet; (2).1{41o50,55,,E Z?.90j,ff:,"lri"|]:"or,0s',u 23.10 feer to rhe poinr of besinnins, eontainins 0.3639 u"r"s,
oatet r //zr/.iz
Colorado P.L.S. 26598
q..
i.r
(..; IN
FG2OF2
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 8165?
970-479-2L38
Description: NEW
Occupancy
Job Address: 1460 BUFFEHR CREEK RDLOcation...: CROSSVIEW AT VAIL BLDGParcel No.. : 2LO3-I22-00-008Project No. : PRJ97-0031
Status...: APPROVED
G AppIied.. : 04/17/L997Issued...: O4/23/L997Expires..: IO/20/L997
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL
PROJECT TITLE: CROSSVIEW BLDG G
NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) PERMIT Permj_t #:
TIMES
89 7-0050
APPLTCANT T.I.B., INC phone: 3036971026
9959 SOUTH TURKEY'TREEK ROAD, MORRTSON CO 8046s
CONTRACTOR T.I.B., INC Phonez 3O3697L076
9959 SOUTH TURKEY CREEK ROAD, MORRTSON CO 80465OWNER CROSSVIEW PROPERTIES LTD I ULTIM
I{oLDINGS, 4000 CIIMBERLAND PARKING BLDG, ATLANTA GA 30339
SFR
Type
Zone
Number of DweLl-ing Units: 001Factor Sq. Feet Valuation2 v-N 96.72 2,329 225t260.882 v-N 25 ,56 57 6 L4 ,722 .56
Subtotal z 2,9Q5 239,983.44Total Valuation: 239,983.44
Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: 3l-7r000.000
DwellingsPrivate Garqges Zone
Tabl-e Date: 05/t7 /1996
Fireptace Inforn€tion: Restricted: yes #Of Gas Apptiances:#0f Gas Logs: 1 #Of Uood/Pa I Let:
**ffi*********ffiff******ffi#***H*ffiffi*#***ffi FEE SUllllARY ffS***S***tr*************t**ffi*********ffi*ffiffi
Bui Lding----->
Ptan Check-::)
Invcst igEtion>
ui tL cal.l.---->
rtt*ffi *tt*tffi ***t*trlr***ffi **ffi***ffi ffi ****tf,****f,t***rffi *#rtrlrffi*ffi *******ffi ******
1,608.00 Restuafant Ptan Review--> .OO Total, catcutated Fers--> 4,O54.9O1,045.20 DRBFee--------
.00 Recrcation Fee------> \1-\f.11\ rotal pennit Fec--------> 4,OS4.X)
3.00c[ean-uPDeposit-------->Y*500.00)Payments---------------->
TOTAL FEES-----
Item:05100
o4 /LL/Lee704/r7 /1ee7Item! 05400
o1/ Lt / reeT
04/r7 /tee7Item: 05600
04/LL/tee?
Item: 05500
o4 /1r /lee7
o4 /22 /Lee7Item: 05550
o4/Lr/ree7
o4/22/Lee7
CHARLIE AcTion:TERRI AcIion:
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CHARLIE Aetion: NOTE PLANSDAN Action: APPR
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CHARLIE Action: NOTE PLANS
GEORGE AcLion: APPR
FIRE DEPARTI.{ENT
CHARLIE Action: AppR N/A
PUBLIC I{ORKS
CHARIJIE AcIion: NOTE SITE PIJAN
LARRY_P Action: APPR tP
ENGTNEERING
Dept: BUILDING Division:
TO DAN
Dept: PLANNING Division:
TO GEORGE
Dept: FIRE Division:
Dept: PUB WORK Division:
TO LARRY
Dept: ENGINEER Division:
NOTE SITE PLAN TO TERRI
APPR SEE CONDITIONS
*ift*rt*r*tffit*ff,trt*****ffi***ffi***t**ff*********t#*****tr**t****t**ffiffi***ftt*tr**a
See Page 2 of thie Document for any conditions that, may appJ.y to this permit.
DECLAF"ATIONS
I hQreby acknoutedg. that I hrve r.ad this apptication, f i l,l,cd out in tul.l, the informtion required, corpl,ctLid !n rccurate ptot
pl'an, and state thlt all the informtion provided as rcquired is correct, I agrre to coipLy vith tha informtion a|rd pLot ptrn,
to coryly Yith att Toxn ordinances .nd 3t!te tarrs, and to build this structure according to the ToHn's zoning lnd suMivision
codQs/ design reviev rpproved, unitorm Euitding code and oth.r ordinrnces of the Tovn applicable thcrcto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE IIADE T!'ENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHOilE Af 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE TRO}I 8:OO AII 5:fl) P}I
Send Clcar-Up Deposit To: T.I.B.SIGNATURE OF O}INER OR COIITRACTOR FOR HIIISELF AND OTINER
PAGE 2********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVALPermit #: 897-0050 as of 04/23/97 StatuB: APPROVED********************************************************************************
Permit TlT)e: NEW (SFR,P/S,DUP) pERr{rT Applied: o4/LL/1997Applicant: T.I.B., INC lbsued: O4'/23'/L997Job Addre6s: 1450 BUFFEHR CREEK RDLocation: CROSSVIEW AT VAIL BLDG GParcel No: 2103-L22-00-008
********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS********************************************************************************
1. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH
SURVEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FORA FRAME INSPECTTON.2. ATTIC SPACES SHALL HAVE A CEILING HEIGHT OF 5 FEET OR LESS,
AS MEASURED FROM THE TOP SIDE OF THE STRUCTUR"AL MEMBERS OF
THE FLOOR TO THE UNDERSTDE OF THE STRUCTURAL MEMEBERS OF THE
ROOF DIRECTLY ABOVE.3. CULVERT MUST BE EXTENDED.RIP RAP MUST BE ADDED AT CULVERT OUTFALL. SWALE MUST BE DUG DOWN TO WHERE EXISTING CHANNEL IS WELL DEFINED.
TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit #: 897-0050
Job Address; 1460 BUFFEHR CREEK RD ,Status...: APPROVEDLocation...: CROSSVIEW AT VAIL BLDG G Applied..: 04/LL/1997Parcel No.. i 2LO3-L22-00-008 Is6ued...:Project No.: PRJ97-0031 Expiree..:
APPLICANT VAL'S ELECTRIC phone: 3034761518
2199 CHA.I.,IONIX, #14, VAIL CO 8165?
CONTRACTOR VAL'S ELECTRTC phone: 3034761518
2199 CHAMONTX, #14, VArL CO 81657OS'NER CROSSVTEW PROPERTIES LTD t ULTIM
HOLDINGS, 4OOO CI'MBERLAND PARKING BLDG, ATLANTA GA 30339
Description: ELECTRICAL FOR NEW SFR Valuation: 10,780.00
Itffi**rr*ffiff,t*tt****f,t***,r|t*,t*t*t******f,*tt*****H FEE SUttllARy ****t*ffi*******ff*tff**t*ffiffi*f,*ffi*t*******ffi
E tectli cat---> 1?9.n Total. Catcutated Fees---> 132.00
DRB FccInvestigation> .00 Total permit Fee-------> 132.00Uitl. Cal,t----> 3,00 payments-------
TOTAL FEES---> 132.00 BALANCE DUE----
ffit*ffi**t***tr*tr*fir**,r|tt*tffi*td*********tntffi*H**ffit****ffiff*i**Hffiffffi********ffi**ffir********ffi
rtem: 06000 ELECTRTCAIJ DEPARIMENT Dept: BUTLDTNG Division:04/1'? /L997 DA\I Act,-ion:- Ai;pR-!tqn:'.05600 !'IRE DEPARTITENT Dept: FIRE Division:04/L7/L997 DAN Action: appn
****ffit***ff****t*******t**t*t*****ffi**t*****lrt*rh**f,***ft*t****rt**#rtt*ttffi**HSffi*******ffi**t**t****t*tffi*ffi
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
******rr***ffi***************ffffiff***,t****ffi**ffi****ffi*tQtffit***f,ff***t****t*****ffi**trt*****ffi*********
DECLARATIONS
r-hereby acknovl.dge that I have read this apptication, filted out in ful,l, the infor]ation required, coipl,eted an accurate plotptan, and state thlt atl the inforiation providcd as rcquired is correct. I agree to comply uith tie iniornation and pLot pl,an,to conpty vith att ToYn ordinancca,and state [aws, and to buiLd this structure according iothe Tom's zoning and subdivisioncodes, design reviev approvedT unitorn Buil,ding code and other ordinances of the Tovn aipl,icabl,e thereto.
REOUESTS FoR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I{ADE TUENTY-FoUR HoURs IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHoNE AT 479-?138 oR AT oUR oFFIcE FROf,t 6:00 AI't 5:OO p
SIGNATURE OF OI'NER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIIISELF AND OI'NER
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-2I38
Job Addre66
Location...
Parcel No..Project No.
Description: PLTMBING FOR NEW SFR
**************t**tntiffi*t**t*#rtt**t*****ti*t*********i FEEPtunbinf----> 330.@ Rrstuarant Ptan Reviey-->
TOTAL f EES-_--
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON ,JOBSITE
Permit
AT ALL TIMES
PLWBING PERMIT P97-0029
1460 BUFFEHR CREEK RD SIatus. . . : APPROVED
cRossVIEw AT VAIL BLDG G Applied..: 04/LL/L9972LO3-L22-00-008 Issued...:PRJ97-003L Expires..:
APPLICANT ROYAL FLUSH PLITMBING & HEAT Phonet 970-328-62t3
POB 1168, EAGLE CO 81631
CONTRACTOR ROYAL FLUSH PLI,MBING & HEAT Phonez 970-328-6213
POB 1168, EAGLE CO 81631OWNER CROSSVIEW PROPERTIES LTD t ULTIM
HOLDINGS, 4000 CITMBERLAND PARKING BLDG, ATLANTA GA 30339
Valuation:21,608.00
SUl.l l4A RY ***t***********H***t*******Jr****ff *ffiffi **ff **t*t*t
PLan check--->
Invest igation>
[,i tt cal. L---->
.00
4',15.50
Totrt Catcutated Fcrs--->
Additional. Fees-------->
Total, Pcrnit Fee-------->
Payments-------
415.50
.00
415 . 50
.00
415.50
62.50
.@
3.00
****trtffi**ffi**rffi*rr|t'r**rr*ffi*,rt***rr**ffi#******ffi*******************#******#**tffi**ffi***ffi*ffif,*ffi**
Item: ,O51OO BUILDING DEPARTMENT04/L7/L997 DAlt Action: APPRIt.e.m:. O56OO FIRE DEPARTI{ENT04/77/1997 DAN Action: AppR
Dept: BUILDING Division:
Dept: FIRE Division:
Ittrrt*trffi**ffiffi**ffrffi**H*tntff**ff*rr*ffi******ffi**ffi********t*tot**********rHr*trtt r*t*t***f,ffi***t*****t*
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
***ff***ffi****i**,i****t***********************#rrt*Jr*ffiff*t**ffi***tff**#******H******i**ffi*ffi***ffiffi*rr*
DECLARATIONS
I. hercby acknovtcdgc thrt I havc rc.d this apptication, fil,trd out in ful,l, the informtion requi red, cotDLeted an accutate ptotptan, and statc that !t[ thc informtion provided rs required is corrcct. I agfce to compl,y Hith tire iniornation and pl,ot irtan,to cot'pl'y |.,ith al'l' ToUn ordinanccs lnd state taws, and to buitd this structure according to'the Tonn,s zoning and subdivisibncodes, design reviev approvad/ uniforn BuiLding codc and othar ordinances of the Town aipl,icabl,e theneto.
REOUESTS FoR INSPECTI0NS SIIALL BE IIADE TUENTY-FOi R HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE Al 479-21n OR AT OUR OFFTCE FROI| 8:m Ai 5:OO pil
SIGNATURE OF OI'ilER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIIISELF AND OTINER
/^
TowNoFvAIL DE*ARTMENT.FcoMMl-rNrryDEVELo'MENT (-^oss \-l \ti,
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PLUMBING PERMIT Permit #: P02-0154
Job Address: 1460 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL Status . . . : ISSLIED
Location.....: 1460 BUFFEIIR CREEK-CROSS VIEW #C Applied . . : ll/2612002
Parcel No...: 210312212003 Issued . . : ll/26/2002
ProjectNo I 1tv Expires..: 05n5n003
otrtNER POCI(ROSS, MIRIAI,! R. 1,L/26/20O2 phone:
317 ,JACKSON ST
DET{VER CO
80206
License:
CONTRACTOR .IERRY SIBIJEY PIJUMBING 1I/26/2002 Phone: 970-827-5736
P O BOX 340
MIIfTT'RN CO
81545
Iricense: 134-P
APPIJICANT ,IERRY SIBLEY PLUMBING LL/26/2002 phone: 9'70-827-5736
P O BOX 340
MTNTI'RN CO
8154 5
IJicense : 134 -F
Desciption: HOOK GAS PIPE UP TO ALREADY INSTALLED INFRAMED HEATER
Valuation: $535.00
Firephce In formrtion: Restrict€d: ??# of Gas fupliances: ??# ofGas Logs: ?? # of Wood Palet: ??
FEE SUMMARY *at*tr+tl**llrt**.*.*:ta'*:l*aaa*ataatatl+at+lla*rtrra*rt'raatta*+l llt'l+tl +a:t tttl
Plunbing->
InYestigation->
Will Call----->
Plan Check--> 93 . ?5 DRB Fee--------->
SO. OO TOTALFEES >
, $3.oo
S2L.1S Total permit Fe€_> g2L.1S
515.00 Restuarant Plan Review->30.00 Total Calculsted Fees---->
30.00 AdditiondFees----->
Payments------->
BALANICE DUE->
$21. 7s
$0. 00
921.7s
$0 .00
Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTII{EIII
LT/26/2OO2 DF Action: AP
Iten: 05600 FIRE DEPARl'lt{El['f
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
(BLDG.): FIELTD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPI-,IAIiICE.
t+lttt+*+trr *a{ l a+ l t+ llt l l{***** **
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is conect. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM.
CTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
tl+laflflflaalata*llfaaa'}ltftt{t*tftfaaa'}**+ft{'aa*fl******lt**+**lft'}a*f**{r**faaa*laffaaaft*i
TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Stsr€mcnta+aat'laallaaaataaaattlaiaaaa*lrtt{'aa***tf*tt*t*+*r*+++++i*+atr**a*t**a+t++*afta++aat*a+ttaat
gEaeenent linliber: R000003505 Amount: S2t.7S LL/26/2O|2O2:25 p]l
Payrnerrt Mettpd: Check InLt: L,C
NoEation: *29L7O/:tarral
$ibley PJ.umbing
Permit Nor P02-0154 Type: PIJITMBING pERllfT
Farcel No: 27O3L22L20O3
SiTe Address: 1450 BI]FTEHR CREEK RD VAIIJ
IJocaEion: L460 BUFr'EHR CREBK-CROSS VIEI{ *C
Tota1 Fees: 12L.75
fltrla Payrnent: $21.25 Total ALL pmts: i2L.7SBalances $0.00*litaa**aaaaaal+*+ataaaf+**lt*+*a+t***'.**a*a++**a**+****+aa'i+***a**a*a'laaaf*a*t*t+tata+allaa
ACCOI,JNTITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 3.75
PP OO1OOOO31112OO PLUHBING PERI.IIT FEES 15.00
t,JC OOTOOOO31128OO I,/ILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.OO
JSP Irc.
APPIJCA'noil wttt
Fax:970-8275234
A+t
14:03 P.01
-$75 3. Flontrge Rd.
Va[' Colondo 81657
YALUATIOT{ FORru'TBIilG (lrbof i Habrlalr)
rllrla.l*artaaraft.r.r.rlrt.tfi.fr.rr*rFOR OTFIGE UllE oJlLY.r.r..t...t.t't'ttt"t"'t't"'-'*rt'
q^ f,f" q
il*ooo, ntnO( A.ntbn( ) @
ffi( ) t4ult€tttttyt f ocfirerni( ) ne*aun*( ) od|G'( )
rlo. *aconrrrooauott unlts ln u|as bu[dl]u3tlo of frOsUtE t)rildllng UnlB ln thls bulldlq:
F/ew'lom/br|r|s/Cmb9srn
,\+f ,r, Vt"'."\rtsil
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
Special Development District and
Environmental Impact Report
hepared fon
Parkwood Realty, Inc.
5299 DTC Blvd., Suite 500
Englewood,CO 80111
Prcparcd by:
PeEr Jamar Associarcs. Inc.
108 South Frontage Road West, Suite 2Ol
VaiL CO 81657
Q03) 476:ns4
December,1992
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
Special Development District Application
and Environmental Impact Report
December.1992
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
Special Development District and
Environmental Impact Report
Prepared for:
Parkwood Realty, Inc.
5299DTC Blvd., Suite 500
Englewood, CO 8011I
Prepared by:
PeEr Jamar Associates, Inc.
108 South Frontage Road West, Suite 204
Vail. CO 81657
(303) 476-7r54
December,1992
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
II.
III.
IV.
t
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
. PurposeandlnEnt. ReportOrganization
SUMMARY
. Important Elements of Proposal. Town of Vail Review hocess
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
. Property Size and Lncation. Surrounding Land Use. Access. Existing Zoning and SuMivision Process. Proposed Zontng and SuMivision hocess. Relationship o Special Dwelopment Design Cliteria. Response to StaffIssues and Concerns
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
. HydnologicConditions. Geologic Conditions. Visual C-onditions. Description of Conditions. Analysis of Impacs
5
f,
5
)
7
9
t2
l8
18
18
19
19
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I. INTRODUCTION
Purpose and Intent
lfe qurpose of this report is to present information regarding the proposed Special Development
District and Minor SuMivisiori for the remaining urideveld-ped farci,:ts of tire Valley Phise tr,
herein referred to as Crossview at Vail. The ploject appiicanl is Parkwood Reaity, Inc. of
Englewood, Colorado.
A development plan for the Valley Phase II was originally approved by Eagle County in 1981.
t?uring the annexation of the West Vail area in 1981, the Town of Vail formally recognized the
99qlty qpp-ued development plan for the Valley Phase II. This development pian perinits up to
26 dwelling units and 32,W square feet of GRFA. After deducting devilopmeirt thdt has already
been constructed in Phase II, the remaining development potential for this site is tS dwelling unitl
and' 20,340 square feet of Gross Residential Flooi Area (GRFA). In addition io the*grandfathered" dwelopment plan approved by the County, the Valley Phase tr has been zoned
Residential Cluster by tlie Towir of V-ail.
The develoament of Crossview at Vail involves development on two separate tracts of land (see
figurc #1, Project Vicinity Plan). Tract A, locared on the north side of Buffehr Creek Road, is
.935 acres in size and as proposed would be divided into two single family lots. Building
enveloaes are designated for each lot and GRFA is limited to 3,471squarc feet dn A-1 and2J75
on A-2. Tract B consists of 2.41 acres and will include seven single family dwetling units. GRFA
for these seven units ranges from 1,724 square f.eet to 2,163 square feet.- The total development
proposed for Crossview at Vail consists of 9 dwelling units and-19,966 square feet of GRFA.
The number of units and GRFA proposed for Crossview at Vail is considerably less than the
remaining development potential in the Valley Phase II as approved by the Corinty plan or as
permitted-by RC zoning. -The proposed development plan does lioweve., inoafy the building type
an! site planning tlnt was approved in the original development plan. These applications have been
submitted to facilitate the review of these modifications.- Comparisons of development proposed
for Crossview at Vail with development permitted by the approved development plan and by RC
zoning arc presented below.
Report Organization
This rgport describes the proposed Crossview at Vail project, existing site conditions and impacts
associated with the proposed development. The findings of this report also address the specific
submittal requirements and review criteria outlined in Section 18.40 - Special Development
Disricts, and 18.56 - Environmental Impact Reports of the Vail Municipal Code. This report is
divided into the following sections:
Innoduction
Describes the purpose of the report and the report organization.
Summary
This section presents a synopsis of the proposed development and a summary of the findings and
conclusions of this report.
r This section describes the property size and location, access, existing zoning, proposed zoning,
I and surroundingland use. A written response to the projects relationship to Special Developmentr Distict DesigrlCriteria and issues and c6ncerns raisdl by the Town of Vail stiff is also pre-sented
in this section-
I Enyircnmental Irrpact Report
This section of the reporrincludes an evaluation of environmental impacts related to the proposal
I and sets forth actions that will be taken to mitigate any adverse effects resulting from the proposed
I dwelopnrcnt
I
T
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
Croswiew at Vail
I
t
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II. PROJECT SUMMARY
Parkwood Realty, Inc. proposes to establish a Special Development Disnict in order to develop
$og9viery at Vail, a resideirtial development consisting of two single family los and seven single
family unia. Crossview at Vail is proposed for tracts-A and B of ihc Valley Phase tr. These tio
tralts ary bisected by Buffehr Creek Road and are located in a neighborhood of Vail commonly
referred to as "the Villey". See figrne #1- Project Vicinity Plan.
Important Elements of the Proposal . -1-\/-./- /,< _t / .,/ .t.._. The proposed development plan include/ 2iunits on Tra(t Ap{7.'trnis on Trad B) This
rcpr€senB a 40% reduction in density frorh1he 15 dwellingbni6 perditted by the devEfopment
plan prcviously agxwed by Eagle Counry and subsequently recognized by the Town of Vail.
Proposed GRF A ls 37 4 qquarc feet less than the re maining development potential permitted by
the briginal Eagt{Counr/ approval.
' GRFA proposed for Tract B is 4,470 square feet less than what could be developed under RC
zoning. Proposed dwelling units are 3 fewer than are permined under RC zoning. A ,, .
. The two building envelopes on Tract A have been sited outside of a Debris Flow Area that
impacts the eastsrn portion of the site. This proposal eliminates the five units approved by
Eagle County that ani located in this hazard arei
. Units on tract B have been sited to minimize impacts on mature vegetation and the steepest
portions of the sitc. In addition, the southernmost poftion of the site has been left undisturbed
in order to minimize visual impacts on the Grouse Glen Condominiums.
. The proposal is consistent with each of the design criteria outlined in the Special Development
Disrictchapter of the Vail Municipal Code.
. The proposal will not have a negative impact upon the physical conditions of the site or the
Town in terms of geologic, hydrologic or other environmental conditions.
l1r _\lc,r.-,-' dbt|)Lr-fl
Crossview at Vail
N
:la\rr\
I
I
:ll
I
t
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
t
I
I
I
I
I
Town of Vail Review Process
There are no formal standards or review process to evaluate proposed modifications to the
developrnent plans originally approved by Eagle County and subse,fiudntly adopted by the Town of
Vail. At the rccommendation of the Town of Vail Planning Staff, a SDD has been proposed in
order to provide both review criteria and review procedures to evaluatc this proposal. this issue is
discussed in greater detail below.
In addition to the SDD proposal, a minor subdivision is also proposed for Tract A. This
subdivision is proposed is in order to create nvo fee simple lots, lot A-l-and lot A-2, on this tracl
CASOLAR VAIL
t\o{,,M
Crossview at Vail
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
t
T
ur.PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Size and Location
The Crossview at Vail site consists of rwo separate tracts of land ttrat total 3.345 acres. See figure
#2 - Prroposed Site Plan Tract A and figure #3 proposed Site plan-Tract B.
Surrounding Land Use
Crossview at Vail is located in an exclusively residential neighborhood of Vail. The project is
bound on the nonh by U.S. Forest Service lind, on the east-by single family ana muiti-iamity
lotqt, on the south b! an undeveloped tract of land owned by tlie Toivn of Vail and single family
development, and on the west by the- Grouse Glen Condominiirms and ttre Valley Condoiriniums.
Access
Access to the Valley Phase tr is on Buffehr Creek Road. Site access to Tract A will be provided by
a-shared private &iveway off of Buffehr Creek Road. This driveway will be consiucted on L
platted access ggsement. Access to thc seven units on Tract B willbe provided by a private
driveway off of Buffehr Creek Road
Existing Zoning and Subdivision plans
Croswiew atYail- represenls the last phase of developnrcnt for the Valley Phase II. The property is
presently undeveloped and zoned REsidential Ctuster (RC). In addition, a development planior
S9- tiq has been approved by Eagle County and subsequently approved by the Town of Vail. The
to[owing summarizcs the hisory of this parcel and a description of the development scenarios that
may occur on these parcels.
!rio1 to annexation by the Town of Vail in 1980, the majority of the Valley was zoned for
develo_p_ment by Eagte County. This approval included devel6pm6nt plans for six different phases
of the^Valley. Following annexation ot-this area, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinanie #13
of 1981, which in effect adopted the Eagle County approvals for all phase-sbf tne Vdtey and five
other developments in the West Vail area. OrdinanCe *t3 granted owners of these properties the
lght_to {ev9l_op plans that were approved under the County, provided that Design Revie'i, approval
be obtained from the Town of Vail. Ordinance #13 also stipulates that changes to appioved
County plans may be approved by the Planning Commission, however, "for any zoning p-urpose
liVond.the Eagle County Commissioners' approval, these parcels shall be zoned Residential
Cluster."
Crossview at Vail
|tai
-rriel.tfl, tFLe/d:l
&,p1e ')N@ 71ft
, t et-r At 18, r.t'j,ttnoa#.Wuwl' v1frvd&-t vd'dl,xetw,$
d4)Y_/ru@Aile B
cJ,"/ ./ .:
'
I.
f
I
'16
- -'**it
.-*-=\* __
t $.
EF
E
E,s$Httrtirrl
'.
I
I
I
I
,'),,
\$
lttr
/ {1,
'Bl
tl
{,!l
ft?l
fri
ll't
'll,,tli,
'tll
rtl
;(
ri.tlrii.rlrti,r
{Itlt
F!
rfr
,rl
'llrll'lll
iii
I tl
I
ti
llt
' ''.i' ':i ''i'
:
i". r .
i', I -:
,
r'1:' , i ' .::'..'.:
."i., ; 'l
;t ., : :;
i:)'.: -
'.:i; .,'
hitF'tt
.Ird -,Ff!-'EnNi /
{lF ,
'i |i; : ',2
:l il iJ .'lir ;i d.
!,!l ,1 rN r
r il tr.ln.*
n&-'l
l'' ,.v, .-7.' ..'ll
lt'
,_- ll/
'ffi
'.''.
".r,:".
.i. ,. ':
. .;jr'
ri:'i ..,;i..:.,,
'i:.'.l!
i$thi
$$$i,, li 1.. .
i\rt+l
l' ,'. r -.
li li ri'ilI' tt rtatl
.tLli, { I 'l
.
',,:.
t'
,. ;-:"::
t.'-l
/k
r i: '
{ i,
n ^ ${ i,,
g$ j"ut liii 1,,',
rrir $$tffii |,'i
td$ #$i$tj$
.' l1' ,
l;ii;i:! r : _(
pf *rrr
,oooll$iliilw' .liratll . :irtt.ar
., q""'"t^ ; ^8 '
,, .,,. ,oo' l
!,| ill ii ."s --
tI
i.
t,
l'',I.
t;
Jt
I'
lt
lt
'tl
llt
'1,,1
rlt
,li,
!ll
:t
t
,I
:!]
1l
,,V,,I
lli
,till!i
.4 hi,
lli,
:
)
IIrIIIIIIIIIIII
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
Given these circumstances, the remaining portion of the Valley Phase tr could be developed one of
three ways:
1) Develop ttre project as indicated on the development plan previously approved by
Eagle County and recopized by the Town of Vail.
2) Develop the propcrty in conformance with existing Residential Cluster zone
disricr
3) Propose modifrcations to the development plan previously approved by Eagle
County.
Table I summarizes the existing development on the site and the rernaining development potential
as permitted by the original Eagle County approval. GRFA figures of existing development wcre
calculated using pc-cu@town of Vail definition of GRFA.
development potential remaining for the Valley Phase IL
ORIGINAL EAGLE COUNTY APPROVAL
VALLEY PHASE II
6zzs y
')
'7zo q .>
ly'4at.z
t9.966
Crossview at Vail
I
I
I
t
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proposed Zoning and Subdivision Plans
The request before the Town of Vail is o modify the prcviously approved development plan for the
Ya{ley Phase II. This represents the third such request ovei the past few years to modify
delelopnrcnt plans previously approved by Eagte County. Such projects have included the Valley
Phase ltr, the Valley Phase VI, and Spruce Creek Townhomes. Each of these rcquests involved
amending approved plans for multi-family development to single family projects.
The two development applications that have been submiued are for a SDD on Tracts A and B, and
a minor subdivision of Tract A. As stated above, an SDD has been proposed in order to provide
both review criteria and review procedures to evaluate this proposal.
As outlined in Odinance #13, Planning Commission review is required for "major changes such
as a re-design of a major part of the site, changes in use, density control, height or other
development standard." The original approval called for a series of townhome units clustered
throughout the two tracts. Parking for these units was to be provided by one large surface parking
lot along Buffehr Creek Road with walking paths connecting each unit. The proposed Crossview
at Vail development plan is for detached single-family residences. Each residence will include
enclosed garage parking and have direct driveway access to Buffehr Creek Road. Because of thcse
site planning and design changes, Town of Vail approval of modifications to the previously
approved development plan are required.
As stated in ordinance #13, the underlying zoning of Tracts A and B is Residential Cluster.
Another point of comparison in evaluating this proposal is to consider what could occur on the
Property under Residential Cluster zoning. The single family development proposed for
Closwiew at Vail is a permitted use in the RC disricr Table {2 compares proposed development
of Tracts A and B with the development permitted under RC zoning and with development
permitted by the previous county approval. Table #3 provides a unit by unit bleakdown of GRFA
proposed for Crossview at Vail. As indicated by this table, Tract B would permit considerably
more development under RC zoning than is currently proposed. Tract A would permit less.
development under RC zoning than is proposed. This is because much of Tract A is greater than \40% slope, and in the RC zone district portions of a site that exceed 40Vo slope do not count,
towards site area when calculating density. 'J
With the exception of the following rwo standards, proposed development for Crossview at Vail
meets or exceeds all Residential Cluster zone district standards. The Crossview at Vail
development proposal deviates from the RC development standards in the following two areas:
TractA
Allowable GRFA and dwelling units in the RC district are based on buildable site area.
Buildable site area discounts all portions of a sitc greater than 407o. The vast majority of
Tract A is over 4OVo slope, and as a result allowable development under RC zoning would be
limited to one dwelling unit. Development proposed for Tract A includes 2 units and 6,199
square feet of GRFA.
Tract B
In the RC district, buildings cannot be constructed on any portion of a site that is over 407o
slope. Two of the buildings proposed for Tract B are located on slopes over 407o. These
two units have been located on the hillside in order to cluster development in a way that will
minimize disruption of the meadow located in the southwestem portion of the site.
COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
RC ZONE DISTRICT/COUNTY APPROVAL/CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
Tf,AC:T A TRACT B
ta Silc Are!: 105318 fect
I,'NTTS
GRFA
STTECOVERAGE
SETBACKS
BLDC, HEIGHT
I.ANDSCASING
PARKING
NOTES:
RCZONING
.1
t\ lU
Scembdow
l0 tt5
m%
V.rics
15-20 fcrt
33'mar
u,44
@%
l2 d ryrccs to
bc coclo€d
5
6Js
3J88
Varict
4-195 fcct
Varics
nta
0
(reu'
c,t\91mu-)
(oo,
635&(imu.)4,,lrBL/
l5-2b-fccr min.
TBD
10.
18l37
(+2254F mit)
26,329
2W
Vrricr
15-20 fc€t
33'max.
63,190
wb
l2 of ryac6 to
bc cndoccd
12916
6,117
6%
Vldcr
32-230 ic',r
Varies
82,t29
7t%
43
All $rfrcc spaccs
PROFOSED
1
13J6iI
9:lt4
9%
Varicr
NL-255 fd
Vrricg
Not to cxcccd
t5,172
%
4 pcr unit
(2 qElqcd)
CTYAPPR,OVAL PROPOSED RCZONING CTYAPPROVAL
Nd !o excccd
TBD
31,630(Ei!)
TBD
of Tna A ir mr ilo96 slope, I marimum d one dualling rmit would bc pcnnined.
fc€t of Tr.ca B fu bss tban.l0& slopc
GRFA figurcr wcre cdo atcd using thc ncw dcfilitim of GIRFA, figurcs also reflecr a 225
o
I
qurrc foor pcr unir dcduaim pcmincd for SF hcncr in multi-frnily disrricts,
TBD-To bc deamhcd dudng dcsign procesc
A ' \s,3xL'
ir. . b4 k'/\
--a;;1
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
GRFA BREAKDOWN
Gross
GRT'A
225 sq.ft.
Deduction
Net
GRF'A
Tract A
l,ot Al
l,o/tA2
Tract B
Unit A
UnitB
Unit C
Unit D
Unit E
Unit F
Unit G
Totals
.1 il.lq L- -\\kr '- , ,Lf'{' s^'(,
\ ,Y^^itD
3,649
3,000
-225
-255
3,4U
2,775
E
;l .n/" '
, l) r"t"
2,174
2,t74
2,163
1,949
2,388
2,388
2-106
2199r
-225
-2?5
-225
-225
-225
-225-ni
r,949
r,949
1,938
r,724
2,t63
2,163
1.884
r9966
Crossview at Vail
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Relationship to SDD Design Criteria
Nine crircria are used to evaluat€ special development district proposals. The following respons€s
have been preparcd to demonstate this proposals compliance with these desigr criteria.
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediale environment, neighborhood and
adjacent propertics relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones,
identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
Response:
Cnossview at Vail is locarcd in a residential neighborhood which includes a
variety of housing types and design styles. While the architectural design of
the project is compatible with surrounding development, the Town of Vail
Design Guidelines and review process provide the most appropriate tool for
evaluating the design aspects of this project. The design of buildings
proposed for Tract B are clearly compatible with ttre scale, bulk and height of
buildings found on adjacent sites and throughout the neighborhood. As
described in greater detail under criteria F. below, undeveloped portions of
Tract B will leave approximately U2 of the site undisturbed and frovide a
natural buffer bet'reen adjoining development.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship
with surrounding uses and activrty.
Responsc:
Pr,oposed density is consistent with neighboring single family, duplex and
multi-family properties and proposed uses are identical to all uses in the
vicinity of the project. The development proposed for Crossview at Vail is
2.69 units per acre. This represens a 40Vo reduction in density from the 4.48
units per acre that could be developed under the plans approved by Eagle
County.
C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.52.
Each of the proposed units in Tract B include two enclosed parking spaces
and room for at least rwo additional off-srect spaces irnrnediately adjacent to
each unit. This parking satisfies the parking requirements outlined in Chapter
18.52. Building envelopes for single family units proposed for Tract A have
been sited and arranged in order to accomodate required off-street parking.
The final design of these units will be requircd !o comply with Chapter 18.52
prior to the issuance of a building permir
D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, town policies and
urban design plans.
Response:
There are in the Vail Land Use Plan that are relevant to this
projecr
arleas not
sensitivity.
ilresses development on hillsides, and states that hillside
evaluated on a case by case basis, is to be permitted in
-visible from the valley floor, and is to be developed with
policy pertains to Tract A in three rcspects. First, reducing
Crossview at Vail
F.
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
density from 5 to 2 units will minimize impacts on the site; second, the
designation of building envelopes will define where constmction may occur;
and third, this development will not be visible from the valley floor.
Policy 5.4 states that residential growth should kecp pace with market
demands for a full range of housing types. The development plan for
Crossview at Vail is based on the premise that market demand is for single-
family homes and not the multi-family cluster development concept reflected
on the County approvedplan A number of previously approved development
plans and multi-family zoned parcels have been dweloped as single-family
projects in response to market conditions. Examples of such projccts include
the Victorians in East Vail, the last phase of Spruce Creek, Buffehr Creek
Chalets, and Elk Meadows.
The Town of Vail Urban Design Plans are not relevant to the location of this
project.
Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologc hazards that affect the property on
which the special developnrent disrict is proposed
As indicarcd on the official Town of Vail Geologic Hazard Maps, portions of
Tract A and Tract B arc located in both Medium Severity Rockfall and
Medium Severity Debris Flow Zones. Site-specific studies of these hazards
havc been completed and are found in the Impacts/lVlitigation section of this
rcporL As indicatcd in thesc reports, the dwelopment of these tr*,o sites will
not incrcase the hazard to other property or structures, or to public rights-of-
way, buildings, roads, sEeets, easements, utilities or facilities or other
properties of any kind-
The debris flow area that impacts Tract A was the primary consideration in
locating the proposed building envelopes. These envelopes have been shifted
to the westem end of the site in order to be totally outside of the debris flow
area- This is a significant improvement over the County approved site plan
which located 5 units in Tract A directly in this deb'ris flow area-
Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a
functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall
aesthetic quality of the community.
Response:
The approval of building envelopes on Tract A will define the precise locuion
of future impmvements. The total land area included in these two envelopes
is 6,350 square feet. This represents orly 15.57o of the total land area in
Tract A. These building envelopes have been sited on the western end of the
site in order to avoid geologic hazards that impact the eastem portion of the
site. In order to minimize the impact of the driveway required to serve Tract
A. the total number of units has been reduced to two. If more than two units
arc constructed, Town of Vail standards require a 22' access. With only two
units, a 12' access can be constructed. The result of this reduction is far less
impact on the site from the construction of this access.
Proposed development on Tract B has been clustered on the northeastern
portion of the site. The result of clustering these units is that approximately
G.
H.
T
t
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
12 of the site will remain undisturbed by this devclopmenL This is very
significant because the undisturbed portion of thc sirc includes the open
meadow that forms the upper portion of the "Valley''. The undisnnted area of
the sitc also provides a prominent view conidor from Grouse Glen and other
existing units.
orrc rcsult of clustering dcvelopment on the northeastcm portion of the site is
that nno units are locatcd on a hillside that exceeds 4OVo slope. As described
above, the RC zonc district does not allow development to be located on4O7o
slopes. Locating units on 40% slope is justified for two reasons. First,
clustcring these uni6 on the hillside is necessary in order to leave the open
meadow undisturbed. This solution represents a far more sensitive site
planning alt€rnative than spreading development and roads throughout the
site. Secondly, therc are no restrictions on building single-family units on
4O% slopc in the Singlc Family, Two-Family and Primary/Secondary zone
districts. Proposed units are single family dwellings and there is no
appreciable difference between these units and development in these othcr
zone districts.
Thc single-family developmcnt program pmposcd for Tract B also allows the
opporfinity to design units amund existing vegctation. This presents a far
more sensitive solution than the County approved plan, which includes a large
surface parking lot ftat would dramatically impact existing vegetation and the
hillside (see figurc #4 Tract B Site Plan Comparison - Proposed Development
and County Approved Plan). In addition, significant amounts of existing
vcgetation will be preservcd on the southwest corner of the sirc by utilizing
low retaining walls to accomplish grade changes.
A circulation systcm designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site
trafEc circulation.
Response:
Vehicular access to Tract A and B will be provided by private driveways
directly offof Buffehr Cleck Road. On both of these u?cts, homes will share
comrnon driveways. As a result, access to all nine units will be provided with
only two curb-cuts.
Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and presene natural
featurcs, recreation, views and function.
Response:
A major improvement to the landscaping and op€n space indicated on the
County approved site plan for Tract B is the elimination of the large surface
parking lot at the north end of the site. The removal of this parking lot results
in an overall reduction in paved area from L7,172 on the County plan to
10..362 square feet on the proposed plan. The rcmoval of this surface lot also
improves the streetscape in the neighborhood. In terms of landscaped area,
the proposed plan includes 3,043 square feet more landscaped area than the
County approved plan. The RC zone district requires that at least 60% of the
site be landscaped,. 8L% of Tract B would be landscaped under the existing
proposal. See figure#5 Proposed Landscape Plan-Tract B.
Crossview at Vail
6
.8 $.
g
o g
is
"$$
trffiiPrl$$H IrBA s?
|ta
tftq{a,
dra'a. az ,,\@ *'tzya .J',^ffi$
)IASSOJOi
:
,)
(l-
rl -
It'l
'r 'i
i'ti
lt
il,
Ili
o?aF
.,.,c
i
{
r\a€
'\e
(-'\
\\
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
't-
E
g\
.g
Bo E
ltw
ar'r+te, taLg/UA
rueA
* I{,*uI i$U,tr{}l{i
I !ltt$
I B[il$
$t $$3N$
ls
i,tlr|d
'rrssF
ffi
Gs
@
g"
M
8t
\7t=tbs
c
TE
-o.
o
CLtr
C'o!ttr(rJ
!t6)PEXr-!+o9(rEF
I
u)
+F
oL
=Eta-lr
\ '\\t" I) thi ntN
/
,/,/._\
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
Overall, the goal of the landscape plan for Tract B is to pmvide sigfficant
concentrations of new plant marcrials at the entry to the proirct, along Buffehr
Creek Road and as a buffer betrvecn adjacent development
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient
relationship throughout the development of the special developnrcnt disricr
Response:
The proposed minor suMivision of Tract A will result in nro fee simple los, each with
the development potential for one single family home. The suMivision of the seven
single-family homcs on Tract B will be facilitarcd by the Single Family SuMivision
prrcess.
Response to Staff Issues and Concerns
On December 20,1992, thc Community Development staffreleased a letter summarizing the major
issues and concerns regarding the development proposed for the Valley Phase tr. This letter
outlined the conoerns of all Town departmens ard the Planning Commission. In order to facilitatc
the review of this proposal, the following written rcsponse to each issue raised in this letter has
been pre,pared. The lettered items correspond to each issue raised in this letter.
Upper Dwelopment Arca (tract A)
A. Show thc desigr of rcaining walls along road, keeping in mind that walls within the front
yard setback (20') cannot exceed three feet in heighr If the walls exceed three feet, a wall
height variance would be necessary.
/
Response:
The width of this accessway has been reduced from22' to 12' ,
longer a need for retaining walls in this area.
As a result, there is no drJt
B. Provide a stamped, sigaed survey of this area since the current suwey is not stamped.
Response:
Surveys submitted with this application are signed and stamped by a licensed su$eyor.
C. Provide the background as to the correct front property line, explaining why the plat and title
information do not identify the same line for the front of the property. Please provide
documentation of any vacation process that may have been done. Resolution of this
difference must be reached prior to final hearing.
Response:
As indicated in the letter found in the appendix of this repon, the front property line
labeled "property line as indicated in title commitment" is consistent with the propefty
line described in the title rcport for Tract A. It can be inferred from this research that
the Lions Ridge Loop right-of-way line platted for the Lions Ridge Filing No. 2
suMivision overlaps the Tract A property line.
D. Provide information as to the debris flow hazard and drainage area on the eastern end of the
upper development area, including the extent of the mitigation which is expected to be
rcquired for construction in this area. This information is necessary in order to locate the
building envelopes in the best location.
Crossview at Vail
F.
G.
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Response:
As indicatcd on the official Town of Vail Hazard Maps, a significant portion of Tract A
is impactcd by a debris flow hazard. Proposed builrting envelopes are located outside
of this hazard rea- Due to the location of these envelopes, mitigation of this hazard is a
mutc point
Staff believes that it may be wordrwhile to pusue alternative designs to the 22-foot wide mad
proposed for the upper development arca- The current desiga does not rncet the sundards of
the Public Works Deparrnent or ttre Firc Departnent. To keep the design you currently have
proposed, the center line radius ofthe road will have to be increased to 50 feet. The road
coull be reduced to 20 feet in width under this scenario.
Another option which may be worth taking a look at is o design thc west€rn home with
direct access to Buffehr Creek Road. This would require the garage to be built at the
prop€rty linc, at an elevation much lower than the rest of the house. This type of
construction is oftcn done in the Forest Road area and may be worth considering for this
projecf Thc eastcrn home could continue o be served by the access drive. The driveway,
howev€r, could be reduced in width to 12 feet and could have a maximum slope of l0%.
The center line radius of the road would have to be 20 feet. These changes would
dramatically reduce the impact to this area and could be made as long as the drive senles a
maximum of nvo units.
A thfud option is to rcduce the number of dwelling units to a total of two. The road could be
redesigned to meet the Town's private driveway standards and would reduce the impact
significantly.
Response:
The applicants share the staffconcem over the potential impactof a22' wide road. For
this reason, the number of units on Tract A has been reduced to two. With this
reduction, a 12' wide access will satisf Town standards.
In an effort to shorten the length of the access road and reduce the impact to the hillside,
please analyze how the eastem envelope could be shifted to the east and/or down the hillside.
Response:
The impact of the access has been addrcssed by reducing the width fromZ2' to l2'. If
the eastern envelope is shifted to the east, it would then be located in the debris flow
area. The location of this envelope has been determined in large part in response to this
hazard.
Reduce the sizc of both envelopes to a mor€ specific, yet rcasonable size.
Response:
The size of the building envelopes are 3,600 and2,750 square feet rcspectively. This
repr€sents l5.5%o of the total Tract A site area. It is the contention of the applicant that
the size of these envelopes are both specific and reasonable. Given the slope of the
site, it can be anticipated that two-story homes will be constructed on these sites.
Assuming building fooprints of approximately 2,000 squar€ feet, these building
envelopes are the minimum size necessary to provide the designer some latitude in
siting these units within the proposed envelopes.
Crossview at Vail l3
I
t
t
t
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
H. Staff believes that the proposed GRFA on the western building envelope is quite high given
the steepness of the lot Given that this arnount of GRFA would allow a stnrcnrrc largcr than
the hornes cunently under constmction in Phase VI of The Valley, the staff believes a smaller
strucfiuc wonld cause less disturbance to the hillside and be more environmentally sensitive.
Response:
The previous submittal proposed a primary/secondary rcsidence of up to 4,200 square
feet on the westem building envelope. The current proposal is for a single family
residence of not more than 3,4A square feet With this rcduction in GRFA, this honp
would not be larger than many of the homes planned thc Valley Phase V[. In addition,
the GRFA proposed for the eastern building envelope has been reduced from 3,000
square feet of GRFA to2,772 square feet of GRFA.
I. One of the important issues involved with development of this area is thc exlent of site
disturbance. Please idcnt'rfy on the site plan an "envelope" which would be the outer limit of
all constnrction activiw.
Response:
The degree of site disturbance cannot be defined with any degree of accuracy until
more is known about the design of these units. Typically, site disturbance from single
family development is addressed during the Town's design review process. It is
suggested that this pfircess be used to define and limit site disturbance prior to the
issuance of a building perrnir
L,ower Derreloprnent Arca fTract B)
A. Consider locating the entrance to the development over the easement, then shift building
envelopes A,B and C to the northeast. This would allow more of the forested hillside to
rcmain. This shift may rcquire locating one of the buildings in the setback. Even thoug[ a
variance would be necessary and staff would have to publish for that, the overall site plan
may be improved- The entrance does not necessarily need to line up directly with Aspen
Grove [,ane. The Town Engineer reviewed the proposal and believes the center lines may be
off-set by either 20 feet or approximatcly 110 feet. Staff believes that showing the ennance
to Aspen Grove Lane and the two alternatives on the site plan would be helpful to better
understand what the best alignment would be.
With units a, b and c shifted, staff believes unit a could then be moved to the north, over the
existing foundation. Staff believes this would reduce the amount of excavation required as
well as site disturbance.
Response:
Various site access altematives were submitted during the past year. Based on input
from the Pubtc Works and Fire Departrnent, it is our understanding that shifting this
access to the west would only be acceptable if it were offset from Aspen Grove Lane by
110'. This would necessitate the relocation of building G, a building that as presently
sited has no adverse site impacs. Any possible benefits to the site that could be gained
by shifting units A, B and C would be lost by having to relocate building g elsewhere
on the site.
B.
c.
D.
F.
H.
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
Show the corr€ct Grouse Glen development on the site plan and include all buildings that
have been constnrctod.
Response:
All Grouse Glen buildings have been indicated on a revised survey.
fhaw the road at the cor€ct width. Staffunderstands that the minimum necessary (as well as
the ma:dmum desired) is22fea.
Response:
The width of thc private driveway serving Tract B has been rcAucd, w 22' .
Identify on the sirc plan all trees which will be savcd. The plans do not app€ar to distinguish
between cxisting and proposed tnees. Please make this distinction.
Response:
The revised landscape plan indicates existing vegetation adjacent proposed buildings
that will be saved during construction. In addition to these trees, the vast majority of
thc heavily wooded hillside uphill from units A, B and C will be undisturbed during
construction. The prcvious submittal indicated significant regrading between units D
and E. This regrading has been replaced with a series of three low retaining walls that
maintain existing grade in much of this area. As a result of this change, a substantial
amount of existing vegetation between these two units will be saved. Existing to be
maintainod and proposcd new plant mat€rial are now indicated on the landscape plan.
Provide landscaping between the dcvelopnrnt and the southern-most curve ofBuffehr Cteek
Road.
Response:
In order to enhance the entry to the project and to improve the streetscape of Buffehr
Cleek Road, a significant amount of new plant material is proposed for this area of the
srte,
Remove guest parking (in conjunction with the modifications listed in "a").
Response:
Guest parking has been eliminated from the site plan. As proposed, each of the seven
units will have two enclosed spaces and room for two additional driveway spaces.
Indicate where dumpster locations will be or how trash service will b€ provided.
Response:
There will be no central dumpster. Each unit owner will be responsible for contracting
for their own individual garbage pick-up.
Please have the survey for the lower area sigred as well as stamped.
Response:
Surveys submitted with this application are signed and stamped by a licensed surveyor.
G.
Crossview at Vail l5
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
hojcct Staking
Staff would likc to visit the site on January 2,1992 to better understand what the development
impacs will bc. Please stake each of thc building fooprins for the lower devclopment area, as
well as both of the building envelopcs for the upper dorclopnrnt area. In addition, please have the
cent€r lines of both the uppcr and lower roads saked. Finally, pleasc identify any clusters of rees
that will remain. Statr will assume that all other trees will -be
cut down exlepf those behind the
boundary of development activity, which is alrcady sakedwittr the ycllow tape.
Staff would like to see the staking rpflect the changes requested in this lener. HowevEr, if you do
not have time to incorporate these modifications into the design before a survey crew has to start
wort, staff would still like to see the site staked according to the current plan that the PEC has
reviewed Please be awarc that staff may have more comments after wc see the staking.
Response:
Building envelopes and 0re center line of the Tract A access road witl be staked within
the next two weeks. The building fooprints and the centerline of the Tract B road
have bccn staked since mid-Octob€r.
Other rssues
A. Please identify how you plan to suMivide the property. Staff would like to work with you in
this area so that the development plan that does get approved is one that you can work with
financially when it comes to subdividing and selling off parcels. We do not believe you will
be able to meet the subdivision sandards for RC Zorrlrtg on the upper tracr An alternative is
to do a singlc family subdivision; howevcr, that process requires that thc foundations bc
construcrcd prior to platting. It is intendcd that this process be used for projeca where the
developer builds each home in the development. Please explain how you would like to
proceed in the suMivision phase of this projecr
Response:
The proposed minor subdivision of Tract A will result in two fee simple los, each with
the development potential for one single family home. The single-family homes on
Tract B will be constructed and subdivided using the Single Family Subdivision
prccess.
B. Pleasc compare the heights of the proposed structures to the heights of the structures that
wcrc approved by Eagle County. Some PEC members requested a cross section to show this
comparison. Each cross section should show the slope of the grade in rclation to the height
of the homes. I think that the cross section would be most helpful if it were drawn through
the area in which homes A, B, and C are located in yourproposal. Commissioners were also
interested in the height of the homes on the upper development area A section through a
tlpical home in this area might also be helpful.
Response:
Cross-sections through each of the previously approved units and each of the proposed
units have been prepared. These cross-sections also include grades adjacent to these
units. Thc height of units proposed on Tract A would be limited by the 33' height
limitation of the RC zone district. See figure #6 Cross-section Analysis - Proposed
Development/County Approved Dweloprnent.
fi $.
B
ll'w
' a'nq€.z t.E/l4El
ru@A p
uEld fiunogTg lcerl
s;sfieuy uollcas-ssorC . 96 a.rn611
4'4l.{rn<W rhltht<1d,,|l'tt\ H!f'|
n omss@Jo
orrt,
ataS
&
elx
arx
4
'u3
atn
- .t14
#.'
ISIIIITIIIIIIITTII
c.
D.
F.
G.
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
E.Please show where the drainage easernent will be dedicarc4 as rccommended by the drainage
study.
Response:
With the construction of the detention basin, therc is no change in the historic drainage
off of the site. There are no plans to dedicate a drainage easernent on Tract B.
Plcase reconsider the aesthetic appearance of the shingles to be put on the sides of the
proposed homes. We believe it would be positive if the homes reflect more of the adjacent
"Valley" architectue, in style and materials.
Response:
There is a wide variety of architecture found in the Valley, and the style of homes
proposed on Tract B are consistent with the neighborhood. The issues of architectural
compatibility and exerior wall beatments arc most appropriarcly handled by the Design
Rodew Board.
Please provide a drainage shrdy for the site. This should address how thc drainage from both
thc upper and lower areas will leave the sitc and continue on down the rest of The Valley.
Response:
A drainagc plan has been completed for Tract B. This report assessed existing hisoric
drainagc from the site and changes as a result of the proposed development. A
recommendation of this report is to construct a small retention basin on the
southwestern portion of the site. This basin will be constnrcted in conjunction with the
development of these homes.
Please provide an updated Title Policy. The one the Town has is dated April 16, 1991 and
shows that Bonnymead Properties, Croswiew hoperties and Buffehr Geek townhomes as
the proposed owners. If the current owners are Limited Partnerships, please provide
documentation as to who has the authority to sign the application for this project. Alt
individuals identified must sigr the application
Response:
The revised title report indicates the current owners of the property. These owners
have signed all applicable applications.
Please show all easements as listed on survevs. and as listed in the title work on the
development plans.
Response:
The revised surveys include all easements listed on Tract A and Tract B title reports.
Crossview at Vail t7
t
I
t
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
The follgwing environmental impact report has been prepared to satisfy the requirements of a
Special Development Disnict.. The EIR has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of
chapter 18.56 - Environmental Impact Reports. Due to the nature of development proposed for
Crossview at Vail and the project's location in established developed neighborhood, the
Community Dwelopment Staff has requested the following elements be addressed by this r€port.
Each of these elemenB have been addressed as a part of the SDD application. As such, this report
summarizes information previously presented in the SDD application
Hydrologic Conditions
A drainage and grading plan has been completed for Tract B. This plan was preparcd based
on the development and site improvements proposed for Tract B. The results of this analysis
are found on figure 7, Tract B Drainage and Grading Plan.
The drainage plan assessed historic conditions and anticipated changes to these conditions
rcsulting from proposed developed. In response to changes to site drainage from proposed
developmcnt, grading will be completed to channel runoff to a small detention pond. This
pond would be located southwest of units D and E, and would be two feet deep with a
surface area of 450 square feet. The pond will be located and desigred so as to not impact
mature vegetation. The detention pond will include a timber V-notch weir to control the
release ratc to the historic level of 3.3 cfs.
Drainage and grading plans for development o-n_Tract A.will be completed-during the design
review process in accordance with the Town of Vail Desigr Review Guidelines.
Geologic Conditions
According to Town of Vail Hazard Maps, portions of Tracts A are located in debris flow and
rockfall hazard areas and portions of Tract B arc located in a rocldall hazard area. Studies of
both of these parcels have been completed and are included in this repon. The two most
rclevant findings of these r€ports are that the building envelopes on Tract A have been sited
outside of the debris flow hazard area and that the development pnoposed for both tracts will
not increase the hazard to other property or strucnues, or to public rights-of-way, buildings,
roads, sEeets, easements, utilities or facilities or other properties of any kind.
Visual Conditions
Two steps have been taken to assess the visual conditions of the proposed development.
First, building envelopes, building footprints and site access has been staked in the field.
This provides the most accurate indication of where development is proposed for the site and
how it may affect visual conditions of the property. Secondly, two exhibits have been
prepared to demonstrate the relationship of proposed development on Tract B to the
Crossview at Vail IE
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
preliously approved county approval. These exhibits include a site plan that indicates
building footprints for both plans and a series of cross sections that demonstrates the
differencc in building height between the two plans.
As demonstrarcd by these exhibits, therc is relatively little difference between the building
heights proposed by these two plans. The proposed location of buildings on the County
approved plan do, however, extend up to 25' further ino the site than ttre proposed plan.
Description of Development
Items to be addressed in the Description of Development section of ttre EIR include:
1. ProjectBoundaries2 Present and Proposed Uses of the Site
3. Pnesent and hoposed Zorrvrg of the Site
4. Quantiutive Information
5. List of Spccific Regulations that Apply
6. DevelopnrntPlan
Each of the considerations listed above are addressed in the SDD application.
Analysis of Impacts
1 . Adverse affects which cannot be avoided if the proposal is implemented
Many portions of Tract B are heavily wooded, and a number of existing rees will be removed
in order to facilitate the development of this site. As stated above, however, two steps have
becn taken to minimize impacts on existing vegetation. Fint, homes on Tract B have been sited
to maintain tnees between building sites. Secondly, grade changes in other areas of the site will
be accomplished wittr low retaining walls in order to prcserve existing nees.
2. Mitigation measrues proposed to minimize the impact, including water quality, erosion control
and rcvegetation measur€s.
In addition to the measures cited in #1 above, other development progmm and design changes
have been made to minimize impacs on the site. These include:
. Overall density on both tracts has been rcduced 4O% fuomthe approved county plan.. In order to allow for the construction of a 12' wide access road to Tract A, development on
this tract has been reduced to onlv two units.. In order to eliminate surface paricing and minimize visual clutter, all units on Tract B will
include garage parking for two cars.. A detention pond on Tract B will be constructed in order to maintain historic flows off the
site.
3. Possible alternatives to the proposed action.
Altematives to the proposed action include developing the County approved plan or developing
the sites under RC zoning. As discussed above, development requested by the proposed action
is less than what is permitted by the County approval and less than what could occur under RC
zonrng,
4. Relationships between short-term and long-term uses of the environment, ,. - )
'r---'
5. Irreveniblc environnrental changcs resulting from the implementation of the proposal.
Thc proposcd action will not result in any incvenible environrnental changes.
6. Grcwttr-inducing rmpaca of the projecr
Tracts A and B are zonod for development and also have approved dwelopment plans. The
proposed action represents less development than what could ocqn under these trno alternative
development scenarios. As a rcsulg growth inducing impacts of thc proposed action are less
than what could occur under other development scenarios.
Crossview at Vail 20
llta
?frq{e tnE/W1
6aae 'ALdna 71!,at1lra^ 4 |{r'EztDr.rtllA' r1AAr\aA(E t2dte'*!4,-1A 1a?i.Ae J;'vd'41,XftW1 $
P6)Y/[rBAp
PAF0gr. f
io
3
\_-__._._-:
.io
J
gI o\
s
g
E
g
It
I
.t
I
7
I
Ii r/
R !-tlrl
ooc
!:ttllttiiiidrdr
rftrl.r,rlpli!li!It$B!t!!
t r!!; bii
!:::::::
f
lil iro"'t-t
!il 'i'ilil
,ii
;f
t:
tlt,
!
!;
ii i! -t i.!' {: 1:{;l iiti ii lillll .tllii l
".:ailltlige
lll![i.'';
f
"
@
C)
6Uo
,,, iil idcld6
!rl ,-.:r: lll 39X!!5-i. i-.:
rl;
lil hi 'ti..'
i
{ot!'-c::=
h5
(AtY5
@
fi-t\-l6(=a=r
-lNt-
gQ
rs
\I
uto- -
t
ti
rl
I
./
I'
atr -,
la'- -
ro't
I('
it
!
>_/
c
-go.
ct)
,E!tctL(,
!tc(r
o
ct)o
.E(E
Lo
!F+
of-5
.!!tlr
o
F(,
(ELF
i//|ru
,,t,,/"*;
.
.,,
_,,.) :,r7y'..
W
,#,,,#'I.^
)lth
l..l{ ".
)-;'-:--'
I
I
!
I
I
z
H
FI
7
lrl|J
z,
A
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
i;
l
I
.t
B.
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
I
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0185 INGERSOLL LANE
srLT. coLoRADO 81652
(303) 87&5400 (24 HOUBS)
ilir+ptti,.rmhur'" .1, i:l " i.ri)q;':l
151i:nvtiltr ij*ln s L ur"
l::1,i'tt- kt,tclc:d [:lea.L t y
Stqcl 01"fi IJlvd" .1,!5SCi
llln n i [i0 f30 r ]. l.
l.-i ur"l ':s Fli dqe flt..rtrcl:l .zig;:i.un
Lien :i .l c.il r r
l. hnr,,e r i:rv:i. {ii w(itcl thct *!F,'\.6in *i tn,,:i, at:l li}'rnnn cn thn ".\cci::iritl)i:lity;i rri:j iii."',E}
'{: oF [] r..rr" n o.:;i':r$ of f:icc!': ii:,,1'1. I iirntl l]cltlr":i, ri F:.1. crw r'*:l't j. errr 'f; ctt- {:ltit't icl,+r: oi:
V*i i1.., ]'h$ rlcr:viitri s11::es ,.,',r'cl t:ir.,t1: n.l: r: l'l{* rJeh:-ir.;; lj "lrt nrn ('::l-' *n fl {i:::l ,,
A'|..rir.{:t'h.r."'nnr.t.|ri:i.nl.i"loiitf:,:j.tl(iliitnl:li'j.:1r..i::]rt.${:'lretnnil'l.t]t+c}(l;.f.('llj:|j:hj.|l
1.:trsl l'l(if{:i:i, i..ltii l;:i(.rC 1... l.::tI I Flfii:;rr-ci ( l,lri,'e .ic i:: (:rrri.:l,ari V j. !.1mg n,:.rp},.
Tire r"pck 'f ,li. ll. si-ela i .s inore :ii:1v$.)r'* .i:r-rr- Lher- nrar[h Urein *tru'.:lr*
hui 1d:i n1 r::i.'it:;trii on 'Lire ntht:'r" *:i tJe m"! T:''act A\ uriiere :i. i:: h;:r, b$liln
r-("pcrrtcli:l i.n "r ccrnt i.lrTrn r an {d{lr,r::; i.i}l:1:.sr i':l-:rt th,ey c"tn b...,'! {itr:r:ii..[ y
grout'he,:iJ *v- ci'hht';ir-t+i ge neLt'i:i^n.1. i:;led h,:c:.ruir.,.':' t-hu), +i-c, 'ttiin ,lnd
di r;c:i:rn1::i. i'tt.tot-r,;. l he rnten,r:r lr al.,lrd i:tr..r*; cllr.il:cr-c:p:i rnuch hi, U t'l t:tr' otl thr'.
hil. l:lide r'.ri.l i. r,:;li cd mosti.), 'i:.m t h li:i ue'ti'*" /-i:1. t h cit-li,'i-l m j. t:i. t::t;it'L:i. t.in '',t'L{:tre hnmc+l; j, {: cilri :i. i:i l::i,r}$,j;:i. h.L ril th:."rlr..tnh r"Ja:i. .i. g i:.ii- bnrrni nq , :i f :i. ei nc,l:
r'l.,'ii,.r.;ltttl.:tJtll.|u|f,i;:f.Lhe.ii:Jt.l{:;lhij\rj{:ii'jlr"f:r*cl..:l:ir"r*;.ii:!r:inilil:!-tt':t
Tlril cr.:n',* i:rr..it;t'.:i. crfi tr'{i i:.: i-r i'l:l t:l r.llii l:*; s.ri.l. ll nr:u i
other prmperty r.rr- gtrrrctLu'"$rri,r ilr- 'fo pr..rb.i ii::
krr': lrl .i ,rrrc- ts-r5.r.-1r..: .:t.p-dr:l#.: n .r i: ;r;r er 1 l- r; , t.,,L:..* . ,1, -',Ir:r'[fi*r' prc.iprirr"i::i $,; tf{ ;lny i.': i ni::i " T ir ci r:it h *:r'
D* thsr h;rr "lrcl cii*rli:lli ,,
.!. -f i:: Lr c.lr- c ,i,\r'{:} ttl.lE,5i:.:ic]ns g.L sesel (:i:iirt.J,rt ilri..'l -r
r-l c:f- Eirt$i[-l i: h i'", f)..r:r.r,i'- il i'ct
r i. q l-i i: :::i -" n'i -,,{ tt -\. ,j
:i b ! lls i::)r" -i: i\{:::i. .i. :i. t- i. c.: s rr
ri:;.i. 1(}3 "\
r r,':r nt:it :i. n r,r:i. i: h i:rt''
(:onr:lt.ri t i. n r,r tJico.[ i::)(li. 15t
t
t
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0185 INGERSOLL LANE
srLT. coLoRADO 81652
(303) 87G54@ (21 HOURS)
iiiinn t mmh ei- l. i:] r L t)ci':
i!'h':+v*rn {ii{i,|nsi I n'rr"
f:',rr- ir: r,..1{:'tctd Reet.l. t 1,:i399 n'Tt: IlIvd, +!50()
i:n0I ewr:od r CO lluLl1
ItE: Ir-act flr I 1..i on '$ R:i ritre :j bd j. v:i. ;.;i on
Del"ar I'1t"liiei fi *i :t iir.: r :l
:l: hnvfii t" l:ltr,,:i fit^l{,jltl {::he b i,lcl t:l.i'i::r.l* ar; ,i:lttltln i;i ri {.:hcl 'lccofrill}ariy:i nct inap
.f or ouf'lro,:ie:i s,S Flnclll llm.[ ]. nrrci i]*rhr:i, ri; [:.1. *',.t t'':.rvi iil?'l i: i::i- tl-ti.,r 'l i;rr'rn o'1:
\r,:li I ,, 'f h r.l twn g:i'tr-**i h,,,r\, $ l:l (iiiliifl r:::lrnlr;r*ir '1.: o he (Lt't{: l::l i: i:tn l:i ti.: 'h ftt*t
r,..rri: gt oI Llrril d,:.:liri'; j:itft r::ii'l {l {::h,ijll-rtlli!,1. ,. 'l'lre rlr':t vdlt'{itv {nLt15 l:. ri:jii l:(='r' t:]n(l
i:i^c::;r! i:hn fr arr, hoi,rrlt'tilr-,
Tlre r-ocl+ f nl I ,rre'a i g mot'r:' frtlV{:L!r- cl l:t-tt-'[:ir el;- r,l irl'.:: t Lh*tn 'thc:*;l i: wt:
bui I di nq iii t t'..g:i artd the l ow ot..ttcr-r:Ds "rlrilvr: f ftu'tlicl ;i'kes ':: J:in be:
eer=i1y r;ror"rte.cl or ci L:hel-f^',j.::t* n$:t.tIt-:t]i';r::d Ltec,:tutgtl 'lhey are 'Lhiir ;r'n d
d: sconti nLtctLtlt, Tlts riict^ cil ha:arrloug cu{:r:''epr mutCh l-r i'iJhtilr clrl Lhe
i-ri lL i::ij.rlu' r'li i I tiltr ed rnn:-,t1f i:() i:it|I ris.gL,, {::r1 i:l'iouqii nri't:i {:lilIi:i on ei't
thfl il crrnb:Ei:i. ti+:.: :i. * Dr::::;tsi. b.l. *+ 1:: lr v- c; t..t cI ft fiaiI .'L g oi- l:r t':l-r'n i n r,l ,, ri t i lii
r:i r-'ciL:r*r[r .[], n$t rntav'T'anLutl l:J t..Li* l;: ct i:l il('. :[ Ill'.r cft*rriEe oi: T ol:hri t-l*ctrin6'
'Lhel $j, i:+ti,, []r"rt c i'- i:i:r |^ri]l'l:: l':i.or' .|:i] i:: mn::i|L: r- tti:: t I otr t+ li. ]. li. Ir r:r
i.;iun r..,'r'f: :i r;:i ..'tll, "
"|.l.ij.g,:i'tli:'j.n*,|'i:cai::i.t.Jnr\th{*r.iL'i:|ri.lr.:i.cli:l'l,*:ttil.[:*i:illjnn
r'.: ill: errr'l:: j.t:1. "|: ill1.i.nt Fi:i{!':lii. :i':; r.;i ll ):j'L.lc h ijl .1. cr^l i. e:"ltt.l. v't j. 1'- h -i:l::i:E}r: L rl
't.: h r...1 t";:i. i:mg i:. ir,llt i-$cl::$ ra:i, .1. li. r-ti-e j. v l-oac!-t i::ht! ::;i:i.'i:c':li ^ ,:.it"td,. i. i: LIe',"'
tlct. t.l:i L ll l-r"rve vt:lt-';' .i.:i. it.l.':l i;rnIrr'ci ,/. l;rtll t'; r-ti-r:ititb l. t" i'ctri'::'; cf.li:ilr- '::i Lt $'ze;t
ttr:i. s r; i. be
Thei:ons.i':r-uc,ti:]!-ii:..]'j:.i:ittll:r*ltit:i..i:i:::'v'r:i..|.].rii:rtj't-lt:t.t:*;itit':l,i:::,i,:i|l..l:.:ll'lj.[n
othtir. 1:r-nptert./ i: i- .strutc'i:i..il'ii.11!, r.xt' {: t:r l:i.tl:.1.:i.c r i. f'J h'i,1*; --i:l i"'1"}-1'/'t
l::i r..t :l l!. C :i. ir rt 'i:; " r" nsd s
il.l::].ri...r.trrr:tpr'lr..[::i.i'*tli.:i'f,lrny!.::i.n*i"|,'..tli.l.L:irtr.+I":::],4:].|:ltt[']
nit'h :i. il 'i: h tiil i;l(ifi::)r':1. !:i; i"l i:l;{ ,:l'1- i::l iiii i' tlir ,i,\ iit ,,
.'Ii::i.].li;t]:)nl:I:i'f{:|g'1r"int::t.:i{:lLrl:i.(;}li:j.1:rF'(]]|'"|i1l€tj::':i*l.yt'jt..io'i:cl
l:: iril [;:i. f.(:1$. l[ i L:iter*i rirr c::' r::lt-L(il lit {:.:i. ol-ts r:r]. ilari {::irli i-: {i ii'i: ,ii(il ,.
lil i n r.: iqr- c.i. l, ,,vilJ, -h"z
l'l:i. r-:nr.:.1. e:: L..fitr,p i. :-:i. :::
il i:n r; t.t.l. f: i t't q liltll::,i. {:ll;] li. ti,1.:
T FILEc0pv
TOWN OFVAIL
D epartment of C ommunity Deve lopment
75 South Fronage Road
Vail, Colordo 81657
970479-2138
FAX 97A47+2452
September24, 1998
Ms. Sally A. Jackle
Attomey al Law
'1672 Matterhom Circle
Re: Crossview at Vail, Unil F, 1460 Buffehr Creek Road, F
Dear Sally:
I received your letler dated September 23, 1998, regarding the driveway paving at the
Crossview at Vail development.
Pursuant to the Developer lmprovement Agreement with the Town of Vail, the developer is
responsible for the completion of the driveway paving work. An inspection of the property by
the Town of Vail has determined that in fact, the driveway paving has been completed to the
Town's satisfaction. Therefore, I have fonrarded a letter to Slewa.rt Title requesting the
release of funds from escrow.
While I understand that B&B Excavating has not yet been paid in full by the developer for the
completion of the driveway paving work, the Town of Vail is unable to continue to withhold the
funds in escrow. Our relationship with the developer, with regards to this matter, is to insure
that the driveway paving is completed. We are unable to intervene in a private dispute
regarding the paym€nt for the work completed.
lf you have any questions with regard to the information addressed in this letter, as always,
pf6ase do not hesilate to call. You can reach me most easily by telephone al479-2145.
Sincerely,fJ*R'-tt.'t
George Rulher, AICP
Senior Planner
Xc:
Tom Moorhead, Town Attomey
$*tn"uoruo
I
LT
August 17, 1998
Traci Schuh, Escrow Officer
Stewart Title of Eagle CountY
P.O. Box 2000
Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Release of funds
Dear Traci,
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the Town's approval of the required paving at the
Crossview at Vail development. I have enclosed the original copy of the Developer Improvement
Agreement for your records.
Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. You can reach me by telephone at 479'
2t45.
Sincerely,
COPT
T0W\:'I0FVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
VaiL Colorado 81657
97A.479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
rG3'*r'-r
George Ruther, AICP
Senior Planner
{S "nt"uoru"
7
Truc+lafar+rl"
Qrr'.o\ A
cASH DEPOSTT FORMAT)
Legal Description: Lor _:;BI&k=-
Subdivjsion qto,t! <l I { \4. Filing L
Date ol Expiaryoi dt--/r-'d'
Address: l*lio il*ffi^{ IX-E7J]-
Account Number: 01-0000-22026
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGHEEMENT
entered into this 340"y or T- l/ . fi1Joy
(hereinafter called the "Developer"), and the TOWN
the'Town").
WHEREAS, the Developer,_as a condition of approval of the
plans, dated (^ - 28 . 191\ wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovemenr
Agreement; and
WHEFIEAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in thejudgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions lor completion of certain improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of
this Agreemenl, including construction of the above-referenced improvemenis by means of the
following:
Devefoper ,aqregg to estabtish a cash deposit witn ifSffi fiffiin a doilar amount
ol $ler9-l=-S:11125V" of the total cost of the work shown below) to provide security
for the following:
IMPROVEMENT
V- atl-ntlil F6^ t.d Al"J f-fo- fr
\)"tn6$
Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipmentanf material necessary to perform and complete all improvements, on or before
--t' /s'- * 7 The Deveroper shail comprete, in a good workmanrike manner, allimprovements as listed above, in accordance witn ht ptans an-d specifications filed in the
9tti99 ot the community Development Department, the Town ot vhit, and to do allworkincidental therelo according to and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
lo the satisfaction of the Town Engineer, the Town Building Officiel, or cther
official from the Town of Vail, as affected by speciat districtl or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approvecr and_accepted as completed by the Town of Vail community
Development Department and public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee performance of its obligations as set forth herein, theDeveloper agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
THIS AGREEMENT, made andud among Co> t -, e,- P'as*n. LI
Page 1 of 3
\
A cash deposit account in the amoun t ot $Jl'-L-42=-sr.t-to be held oui'frffi*,?fff
escrow agent, shall provide the security for the improvemenls set forth above if there is
a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set lorth
above for another form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and the performance of the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative collateral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in
this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable tor any persons or property injured by reason of the
nature of said work, but all of said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize for partial release of the collaleral deposited with the Town for each category
of improvement at such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount of the collateral that is being held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town determines that any of the improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set forth herein by the date set
forth in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall not be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary to complele the unlinished improvements, The
Town shall release such funds upon the written reguest of the staff of the Community
Development Department stating that the improvements have not been completed as required
by the agreement. The Town shall not require the concurrence ot the developer prior to the
release of the funds, nor shall the Town be required to verify independently that the
improvements have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon the request of the Community Development Department.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be
collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such propefi. lf
the permit holder fails or re{uses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning Code.
7. The Developer warrants all work and material for a period of one year after
acceptance ol all work referred to in this Agreement by the Town pursuanl to Section
17.16.250 if such work is located on Town of Vail property or within Town of Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to time, provided that such amendmenls be in writing and executed by all parties hereto.
Dated the day and year first above written.
Page 2 of 3
II
I
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
&Izi","ryw,"ylsfl3l"':l)flf; ""',1yfl.l'CItt*u*o'"'",n''.
Witness my hand and officialseal.
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
The fo,regoiqg Developeru,ay of 1
Witness niy hand and officialseal.
My commission expires: 1p
updsted 928191
Page 3 of 3
t
coils"FucfloN, rNc.
Srr,l,tmrnol
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:
0057 Ec,wards Access Road . RO. Box 1 176
Edwads. Cotorado 81632
(970) 926-5411 . FAX (e70) 926-5465
FfiX c
Adclrses:
gteve Gensler
Segg DTC Blvd.
Englewood, EO.
* 50cr
8O111
Dan ol Plens:
we h.r6by Frpos€:
1' Regrade existing Foadbasc and Flrce an additional ltt of 3/4" roadbase tothe entire araa of approx. - 6eOO AF.
Apply soil ctrrilant to tha roadbasr to tnhihit plrr* gnowth.
Furnish and place 4" of asphelt paving over the same rl.ca et abov€ -aFprox. 6aOO SF.
dr
3,
Proposal
Page I
Erossvlew
Driveway to Unite R & D
1488 Buffehr Creek Rd.
Phona: . 476-6018 7/30/96
PRICINE FOR THE RBOVE T.IORKI
6a6O BF E r3 e.33 / 6F" Totsl !F
trFTION:
15,819. OA
3[ Rsphalt pBvtng over the same BEOO SF.
5aO@ SF e + e. 15 / 9F. Totel t lgrSBe.OO
NOTEEi r* Survaying rnd Testlng ls not ineluded irr this pnoposal,* If additional roadbaee iE r-quiFedi It will be on a Tlnre end hatanialscogt baais.+ If the ameunt of pavlng inereassEr the above Unit pnieEs may bn used tc.,celculate the coct of the uork.* Bi,lling will be besed on inEtall:d quantitlae at the ebove urrit prieee.
All ol the abova wotk to bo oornplet€d In a subeianlal and wo*morllko manner tor th€ sum ol
** SEE ABOVE *'*
IMPORTANT: The t3rrc srd condilioG slded on ftc row'so €lde heFol are srprcasty made a part of this contrEct. ThiB proposal lhrll nol bccomr E
urdry contr ct unl$3 and unttl the Apc€Ftanc€ of Proposal .nd ConlirnEtion by CorilrEctor on the t!\rarce tldc heve been execlted. Thic propo6al
a- tzt)- -- fut;b F}
rsud ba a$ptad eB ptD\rldcd ard dellw|d b Elrm CorEtrus:tion, Inc..
*?o |ooptlh|t propooal, plamo algr bad( ot
whhrcopy md rttum to Elrm Gonrlnrclicn,
Inc. Elm Contlrucilon, Inc. rhrll not bc
bou$ lrcrOln lo arcdrlr r contrrct unleffttc.u||.r proylde3 3l|3hotory wklcnoc of
rda{|rrbnmnclne.
ftm1q44,3:."
deye tom .bow drlc, or h rhall erpin.
-3a*
Fespecifully c$mlfied
by
David Hillbrand - Estimatc,n
.Sally N. Jackle
Attornsy at law
Corcneoo Opprce:
1672 Matterhorn CLcle
PO Box 70, Vail, CO 81658
Tel:97G47S1300
Fax:97M764494
CHrceco Orrrce:
30 Nonh Lasalle Street, Suite 1426
Chicago, lL 60602
Tel: 312{3zl-4100
Fax: 312{311-4104
Re:
PLEASE REPLY TO COLORADO OFFICE
BYHAND DELIVERY
January 28, 1998
Mr. George Ruther
Town Planner
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Crossview at Vail, Lot F
Buffehr Creek Road, Vail
Dear George:
This is to confirm our telephone call ofyesterday afternoon, in which you stated that you were
sending me by fax the temporary certificate of occupancy issued by the Town of Vail for the
above property (which I received), and in which you stated that the conditions for the Town
issuing a final certificate of occupancy for the above property will include the completion of the
common roadway and driveway, the drainage culvert and swale and the landscaping for such
propeny.
Ifthis letter incorrectly states what you stated to me, please let me know immediately.
Thank you.
John Madden
REpT131 TOI^IN gi: VAIL, EOLURADO F,AGE 1I
AREA: CFAr/eA/9A OB:35 REGUESTS FOR INSF,ECTIDN TJORK Sl-lEE'fS FOFr i/3u1,/rig
Activity: 897-tZtul49 I /eA/94 Type: B-BUILD Stat r-rE: ISSUED Don!itr : NSFRAdciress: 146O BUFFEHR CREEK RD
Loc.ct i on : CROSSV IEt^l AT VAIL BL-DG F
F,ar.ce 1 I llOJ_1Eg_rara_fiAg
De scn i pt i on : NEti SFR
Appl icant: T. I. B. , INC F,hane: iZ.?6971O7€,
Owner.: CROSSVIET^I FROF,ERTIES LTD ./, ULTIf'1 F,hone:Contt'actor': T. I. B. , INf, F,honii: 3836971O76
Oc,.--: OOET Use: V t{
Inspect ion Req lre st Infonmat i on;Requestor': TIF Fhone: 479-9 1E3
Req Timer OB:OO Comrr enbs: TIB/2r79-91i3/UNiT F
.Items t'equested to be Inspected... Acti.on Cornments
.lAt353O BLDE-Temp. C/O
.ll.:-
;lInEpectian Histony.,.,.
Itenr : 0ttZtSOO Ftrl-B;rckfi I 1 Inspect icr
It ern : U|O5Ol F,[^l-Temo. access,/dr-aina
Iten : O'Z'O7el BLDG-l'lisc.
. IA/e?/97 Inspector.: CD
Item : tZ'OlaBA BLDG-Fina1
ltem: tZ0s3t-t BLDG-Tenp. C,i O
El. /E:A/98 Inspeebar": CD
n
Ti me ExJ
:; il:fr; fi$3frs [il:Fi;:T 5:::'::--, o,.ade ?nsu.r'r1 Pepr" Ep*.'i+ Iter,r: a0ala BLDG-Footirrqs,/steei llZZlqb [J*ft lzi lqa rJ;^,YR'v-*Jwl
ua3/U6/17 Inspector.: CF Aciion: AF'F'R add bai's at fir'eple i.rad
Not e.s: stlr-rctr-*"a1 en6 appr"aval of u;a1I ha'igl-rts i-eq! d
AA/t?/97 lrrspertor.: EG
It em : AEAPO BLDG--For.rndat i on./5t ee1
Item: OOSeA F'LA|{-ILC Site F,lan
Fctiorr r f;FFR w.eIis bldg f
LA/3fr/9-7 Inspector: GEORGE Action: AFFR RF'FROVEI)
It em: AAOJE BLDG- Ft-arn i'no
I'A/e7 /97 Inspertor*: ART
lA/3Ll97 Inspecbor: ART
Aciion: ltN ILC nob pnovicled
Acbion: AFFR w,/cst'r'eet rone as nottld:
Notes: FROI'IINF CORRECTIOf'lS Til FE VERIFIED AT TIi4E OF INSULATION
I NSF.ECT I RI.I:
- CONF.LETE FIRE BLBC}(IN6 AT $'TAIR STRIN6ER9 I"JITHIN FRAME
Wf;LLS_ FIRE ELOCK RLL CONTEFILED SF.F}DES TFIAT THANSITIiJN FROI'1
VERTlDAL TO HORlZONTAL SF.ACES.
FIRE BLOCK ALL CD|.ICEALED TJALL strACES RT fl MRXIMUI)LOF lrz
Item : u.lAA56 BLDG-Insr-rlat i on
7A)/3Ll97 Insper--tor: AR-i \Art i on: DR cnr'i"ec'r; i on as roted:
Notes: VERIFY CORFECTIONS NDTED UNDER FRAMING Al' TIME OF iilsp.
LL/45/97 Infbector.: CD Act i on: AFtrR RFF'ROUED
Notes: FIRE BLOCHING BEING FLACED FI'lDtl
Iten: AAA6gr BLll6-5heetr.ock Nai I
AcL i on; AFtrR AF'F'ROVED
Action: AFFR
Ac't i or' : Dil
LFITHE II'ISF.ECTiON
r-.!f{ i T F
Il/L9/97 Inspector: CD
Notes: I,IRAF SUFFORT COLUMN IN GARflEE
69/a8/L?94 tIzaF - 7763339311-
t"t ,tt 'Qt z
ll,
LJLTII'IA I-|0-DINGS PAGE A2
JRN 05'9:04 No.00t F.02
o
0l
Clrwn? lUtLDrct Drfrrll tO. t?l[tKrl nOFqrAL
ltor Mr.lr.r0srrbxd FROM BrmDffrtcrrviyayrit. t,td. rd tffrliclbtFdrU&hc.Prhdnrtdq. trx pp.gi tt!3tl!2OrlVhrptrcc Aro\OO. 11620bbl6t.CO. tot(4
?9t.r9+9,6*ror | . l* or.22?t (9t0) t eilt7. rllr r]?(n' rrr q!6ag r t
we her*y puporc ro ,brlifi rhe nrlrldfr'd prftrn b lr!, nsry hr ll, orpoim of $rlilcrfhdon of rD to rco ( L rlaolukiiudc ffic;;r; f,rcfU,rlrfr Offorf.ri lilt ofcairorr3a! mdoodiiru: t.Urt'Doryrnnot,n rd&ip.&td,ual-i,n tem<fOirUirUJbv.loo.hticdrltvrlr' rt l'ilokr.i.t vrrte tno rrir lcnsilfr gr'_.t d!fiififfi'o.ti erirtinj cotcrhrbr onpbr rnnlic tn ,oajc of rhc tTli--tili f,iUi"p q il ..1-f1,, . *r .r rb nedb rd cr&lr of D.' l" Dun unroair,"f*rt a nrnio.toivillErrc{ t.Eido,iC-#iirE (Elh. N!? til} potyinrr ffinll, urd rrirrcrs .'.'J cr|tnp crm;. A;on$hd6 offlnnrr Fop . A{uubrr ;u &rrr rcorhr& ,'d tu"rtird 4' poluF :Dnv dq rfii drrcr ot mrs o r[ enrrudfiiinrbr rrr A rw &ippr dll srr ur itr 'rrr rhqbc.
-
vrr- ui.r .;ft 6r tft,f ;-d'j ;;;r iirr u r,-a, vh tr. ,eiollfi r*nbtin. A[ urrrcf x;r rs to bc breU$bd ld-i,nFf .-;b ;ff-;lb winrddc ofilr4,rrn in tb ILll of t eet .t:,t p_,ot r
"lc I.GEJ. u {,8; $t, b ;dficl drryr, or ord.bavo ,hat .ttirdr Anv r',rrr or d-unr{ct o oii& Tionr voft * uy buirdiru (a.o} wiil b3+nudd et r bc ''c nr'f.*r,_ry C"tfriffti_li-_ 1iffi.n .,fihou wriur od'r .d *ill brmr r mreltjoowrrd&vsrhrrcr$mr|:'rrwiliirmlotitoQolvba\hit. Tro(4Freootirrrddroruplvurrdsqrolrrrcrroathsburllir5'AB;hitat"lbrrnur.iii-riar.rir6dairit
nrof tllvnrnhq'rndhr:tpsrocrwtvicsrr-vrit]sr;dnfcdd;doriti''rruinionusiliry
Imnac q' drc rloc wc\ :. b. ulq q p r.m G,sa gruc hc. A[ '.'i.r b jrrr*nf op 1n1ilt' rnc ggrnlrletc,l ,'
"
tut'onntht'*offiiih rrrurr 6nhr run cf grrr rtrrnd ivrhrru rrtin (t?l!.or ,ryn.n', u. b b nrdl o-foiloua .qr il bdf (it7t0) drydr ir nqdrodHLgtH.S:T.:y,:^!Il":ilailu";,,,y(r0)'nfrh;ilii,fu ,bft ,p,ells
w JM, n. E t sijn.n_. toFrtotly
llrOBX TO Bll PBronr,iltD AT:Garviou Vd[Bdilrq..f. V.il,OO.
AoCltr|nclClrctiilrL
lb flpto ryolficrrront lro lr n ldrfrcuynd rlu hrbyrc4l4 you rrrlboded F prgad rr outl.rrd
t,
empldioa. pra d., rrnounrr'c rubjocr rooH ol crl Hirirl-i ir:rl p.-iJiitfr i|iliffi"rcrbc cllqr of lw$.lir ; ,:ailrn 1i25.S) r-d$'.l,\OOv srt in*Usivt-6p abote woff.., net*iOpd .
p (t^(F*--
6'?-qtr
Q.^o-.gdltrq ole/a
4-o-u J..o c-4'*<-a*&-
Sf,,e*-frt?
ne(4O
t
Date: 11-Jun-98 Tine: l-L:12 AM
rD':f,ffffiveo
________:_:_:_:_:_:_fI___:_:_ti_:___:_:_3_:_1_L:___:_:_i_l_:_:_:_:_:__
Prepared byStewart TitLe of Eagle County, Inc.
P.O. Box 2000vail, co 8L658
Phone (970) 949-1011"
Fax (970) 949-77L3
seller(s).......: cRossvlEw PRoPERTTES| LTD. I A COLORADO LTMTTED PARTNERSHTPBuyer(s).....,..: THOMAS S. PAGE. l,tolLy F. FRALICK,
HARRY D. PAGE, TRUSTEE OF THE HARRY
18, 300.00
1_8,300.00
Property. .: Lot c CROSSVIEW AT VAILClosing date.... : 06/L2/L998 Proration date: 06/t2/L998
Escrow Officer..: TRACI S. CARSONFile Nurnber..... : 98015573
SALES PRICE.
t
PRORATIONS:
COUNTY TAXES
fron 01/01/98 to o6lL2/98 @ S 4.25877 per day
DUES.fron 06/12198 to 07101/98 0 $ 4.931s1 per day
PAYOFFS:
PAYOFF FIRST MORTGAGE.Principal anount. .......: g 394 ,2O7.94PAYEE... ! MOUNTAIN BANK
LOAN #104s4802
coMMrssloNs:
LISTING BROKER COMMISSTON 3. OOOOO?. . . .
PAYEE...: SLIFER SMITH & FRAMPTON/VAIL
ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE
SELLING BROKER COMMISSION 3.OOOOO8. . . .PAYEE...: CENTURY 2t VAIL VALLEY
TITLE CHARGES:
DEBIT CREDIT
61O, 000. 00
689.92
93.70
394,2O7 .94
OWNER'S TITLE POLICY.I.... 745.00Liability anount (oTP) $6L0,0oo.ooPAY8E...: STEWART TITLE OF EAGLE COUNTY
RECORDING FEES/TRANSFER CHARGES :
RELEASE FEE. . 20. OO
PAYEE...: STEWART TITLE OF EAGLE COUNTY
RECORD POWER OF ATTORNEY...
PAYEE...: EAGLE COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER
MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES :
6. OO
Lender.
COMPLETION
PAYEE. . .
ESCROW FOR
PAYEE. . .
WATER/SEWER - ESTTMATE.
PAYEE...: EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRI
TRANSFER TAX..
PAYEE...: TOWN OF VAIL
r-50.00
3, 050. 00
L7,525.OO
1-, 000. 00
ESCROW.
STEWART TITLE
PUNCHLTST
STEWART TITLE
:::::::::::::::::li:T:i.ii::T: ;Siil3: ilS;:;:,X .,.:.,,:,,
Page: L(Continued on next page)
lD.t, Received l^7g &"^tgL^.h).lJ
CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
Legal Description: Lot
-
Block
-
JUN 11 19S
Subdivision Filing _
Date of Expiration:_
Address: _
Account Number: 01 -0000-22026
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AG REEMENT
THIS/AGREEMEIgT, made
and amongL4ztJoft,z hopa lze
and entered into this J,ta^yot G"< . lg?t,by
(hereinafter called the "Developer"), and the TOWN
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the "Town").Ft*'M
WHEFR\S, the Developer, as a condition of approval of th 6@-1')
plans, dated 1916, wishes to enter into a Develo-per lmprovement
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sutficient in the
judgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certain improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
following:
;lL-^+T+u 4--
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit witl/the Town of Vail in a dollar amount
of $lZ .ll-,t1e (125% of the total cost of the work shown below) to provide security
for the following:
IMPROVEMENT
)2(z 8,Jbo 'uo
)
z) 7*ft^Syrle,t L1 buus,thls-,\4oc.-(,rlc Cc^Ln'acl*at /;/ 'a'-'o""'j/'ta--
:;t-l ? = (er.r 3,-tto.o. pntJ ioa /a1-,ap4 all+.t'J +k blno t !2rc xtzfl
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and_material n^ecessary to perform and complete all improvements, on or before {-6 - /?' ?f . The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the Community Development Department, the Town of Vail, and to do all work
incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other
official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete unlil
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Development Department and Public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee performance of its obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
Page 1 of 3
A cash deposit account in the amount of $to be held by the Town, as
escrow agent, shall provide the security for the improvements set forth Above if there is
a default under the Agreement by Developer. S-", a.'lJ, /'t o-ls C.'.'e^aJl,
l"-ll,"l ft,oo: i- ^J i^lo.-,1 Lo.^n,^1 acca*tf 4- t@-)rlro-;l. The Develooer mav at anv time substitUte the collateral orioinallv set forthDeveloper may at any time substit collateral orig inally'set forth
above for another form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and the performance of the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative collateral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in
this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the
nature of said work, but all of said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereoi) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or defending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer may
nave.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize lor partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category
of improvement at such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount of the collateral that is being held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town determines that any of the improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set forth herein by the date set
forth in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall not be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary to complete the unfinished improvements. The
Town shall release such funds upon the written request of the staff of the Community
Development Department stating that the improvements have not been completed as required
by the agreement. The Town shall not require the concurrence of the developer prior to the
release of the funds, nor shall the Town be required to verify independently that the
improvements have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon the request ol the Community Development Department.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eag(e County to be
collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf
the permit holder fails or refuses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning Cdde.
7. The Developer warrants all work and material for a period of one year after
acceptance of all work referred to in this Agreement by the Town pursuant to Section
17.16250 if such work is located on Town of Vail property or within Town of Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to time, provided that such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto,
Dated the day and year first above written.
Page 2 of 3
Cot t#t+t L1
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
rlt'Jl3'1
ing.Developer
d and official seal.
My commission exptres: tL/OY/O t
Notary Public
PLANNER, COMMUN ITY DEVELOPMENT
STATEOFCOLORADO )
) ss.
couNTY oF EAGLE )
The foregoing Developer lmprovement Agreement was acknowledged before me this
day of 19_ by
Wtness my hand and officialseal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
updaed 92$9a
Page 3 of 3
ATTACIIED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Attached to and nade a part of Warranty Deed frorn cRoSSVIEw
PROPERTIES, LTD., A COLORADO IJIMITED PARTNERSHIP ,GTANIOT(S), tO
THOMAS S. PAGE, MOLLY F. FRALICK AND HARRY D. PAGE, TRUSTEE OF THE
HARRY D. PAGE TRUST , Grantee(s).
LOT G,
cRossvrEl{ Ar vArL, PITASE 3,
A Resubdivision of Parcel 3, crossview at Vail, Phase 2,
According to the Amended Final PIat recorded December 18, L997
in Book 746 at Page 734 as Reception No. 642678, and as defined
and described in the Declaration for Crossview Properties, Ltd,
recorded June 17, L996 in Book 69? at Page 493 as Reception No.
593485, and recorded August 7, 1996 in Book 702 at Page 239 as
Reception No. 598226, together with a L/7 undivided interest in
the general cornrnon elements described in said Decl-aration.
PARKWOOD REALTY. INC.
OPEB'TING ACCOUNT
s299 DIC BLVD., STE. 500
ENGLETV@O, CO 80111
t 086
,,,,, /i - /o -f,f id?il$'
----J$,
-/u-, /o4 A/
{
,Ju*
611 4"
Ary(i::ffiF
*n,,, fi o-'*f dla
-*
p;lz-*.,.,
,t ro?dd?ffir[;o'ss so ],, soi,.
ct r.nJ
J/
r-ensEFf
FTaur ti...
1)o
lrt,
fft
E
J
,lo
-:9
Ers
*t
p
N
t*l.
g
)Eoo
'!
otn
rno
LN
lnln$,-,
+.,t;
rdl
);{b
lr{ilfu
qF{
JI\l)l{lil
{lol
Ef'l
et
E
I
: Ei
i:iii
:!i :3v2
tr
EF
oz*H:
!fi H:
H:9:
oEdF
SExt
iHsgE $ru
o-
o
u,r
e Ar SHSRRJrFilL;f; I'
t{c'
ffi&lfo'if;o"&,"''
', 6r.//.e..f.
3oi -
C*G> ,.1 ^- 1
)ee t?,)nuL
4zo - 176 - 7G sr
hro.,u,'n') C *,tfu-
/7? "'
dJ&.J- ,,,"L
#Sqoa
AJ/-L ti, ou-a P"^- A, B'C s D
-ZJr,t A,ffi
I {rr'h
f@w a
a\ilq
- , w-tfil'lul
C- Z- lr, .:E:l,.,{ri'
tiv
tlI
i
t
I
"r Q^^t..gd,Q'*'
(*,
t
TOWN OF VAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Fronnge Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970479-2452
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Eagle County Ambulance District (926-5235)
Eagle County Assessor's Office (328-7370)
Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (476-4089)
Holy Cross Electric, Engineering Dept. (949-4566)
Public Service Company (949-3289)
Public Service High Pressure Gas (468-1401)
TCI Cablevision (949-9 I 38)
Town of Vail Fire Department, Mike McGee (479-2176)
Town of Vail Police Department, Miranda Steber (479-2216)
U.S. Postal Service (476-1065)
US West, Carson Bell (970-244-4349)
CommunityDwelopment Department, Town of Vail
June 4, 1998
Address Clarification
VIA FAX
The attached map is intended to clarifi the address assigment for the Croswiew singlefamily
homes located along Buffehr Creek Road. In the recent past there has been some confusion
regarding the correct address assignment. The correct address for the Crossview development is:
1460 Buffehr Crtek Road, Units A - G (i.e., 1460A, 14608' 1460C' etc.)
If you did not receive/pagedincluding this page), please contact our ffice immediately'
3
{S un*oruo
yYfl_t_tr
Hffif'sL pl'J /4
:ILING NO 2
rOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY
,460 tel
tlto
b'i#F#qff;FIHF:iF.nF.
I \--rs--/ PHASE vf?
EY TRACT D
VAIL POST OFFICE
| 300
*
r3to
:l
: J!/l;:'1 .artret,l> z-t4t- d-tdta- a'.d
Iogto'.:a-ri
i' zv
I
I
Fc.hv'iz'-- t n\ti
,-6t L -lL
rFrr
ffirs:lvJp<xly 4
JAtFttrfr\,e\lzFl t i--T\ixlv 5--.;
A, tbo'',VK\ iE\-Fr',t ttlt,r @.r tr.ill, 1,.+r
k\al. AtiLaf..a,4l
Z, 4.rJ-
1eJ4
,'a - )'.\\a;-'.
E+.4e-\
i t{16 3.
l||y la. lltt a:'12 Ftl Frem:fr'Prg| t ofI
B & B EXCAYATING,INC.
P.O. Bor l{t. Vr[, CO st6tE / 9?0 tlGtilt
AGREEMENT
TOr T,LB,,Ino D.\TE, Mo], 14, 1998nlt Crc$r4.r.r V'rO FAli # phonr #'303.697-10?6AfiN;Tlb 99t96oe6Tr*.yCl,Rcr4Morriroa,CO t0{6SFor 1ow conlidrr$ion wa off$ tht followitg quortion wtrictr, ie rccrptrd rhrll con*rtun r cortrror b.rnonul;
A hep rnd pav: dnvcq,eyr, snn'oxirflrtely t,J9t rq, lL (from phnr)
lVodr ro lncluCt:
I ) sltope rrd curaplcr cxirrrn5 rord bonr (n,.rl brrc prog lo br pscived rt r/..10 ulr fipt);Addltlond wodr slll bo rlono ot cur Jin. md nittohll mtor.2.) Ariditronal excavrtioa duo to rrnnritrtrie mererirlr (roclc, roft qml, rtn.) ou be dcrnc fftine md mrttrirl r$c|.
l.] lt*..oa *Fo. J l/t tnchl of u!*ntsl (qr.o lift.)
{. i Lcluriro llx or mrtcrirlr lul dolivctj;
cmr. .t 1t,60(}00
Not r Utilir). loono re tht rtrponribiliry of rhr cwour. hie docr not includr rtloortron ofuilider' if ncq&d. tlevitronr ^tiriri*r for;rrqprr &rurc. D & o &rcrvrting. howitl tror erro' .,ry wck withorr ? eo dopc ror dninrg. 'i,-rbgr;; wook-;tiiEuilr.a rrour lrmr rnd lurrid rrtgr,prbrr crc gmd until goptonbor 15. tggt pr{co doo not Includr wlnt r condiliaa..
Pl..r. .lln la thr rpror provldrd and
",iurn to ! & B ErcrvrffDl, Tht. prqlfct r l br rdrrduhC
!1o-T.T.f:T3-clthlr rrrnrnyrb. y E lD Ercrnrtns hc n Jjned co'pylUr r. ru,*",J.a o :
upon ro.rr.ptrocr cf thlr r8ruru2rb. y B lD Erc_rvrtlnl I.c n djned oopy-rlll bc frr*erdrd lo youfor your llhr ltir qrrernr4^d lDJrct to eondirlont i rhorn on nvrnj ilCr trlroLFon n n [ /r/ - trinErcrvrtrnl,lns,
-
lrf.a,o(\82,n, Aruor:z'gsr8F'ttu*
E$iro.i{n
Dnr;
n(>;r>sSr*_{
\\-,--
,'^, C E t"-:l=, &L(-,Q-c
l&*-jvis,(+-'J/J-* c"Y++ t^J
l.t<- ) e^'*-
A9/A8/r997 11:34
rt0fil'
Prc;rcrcl
Srotl
lclefAonc nvnrbcr
'ir ""- --
All motrriol ir g qroaiad 'o l.; or rpc<i{ie3
c-d rpxilrolcrr rvhmi"r:.i .,[r,2 .,,6r,.
lca-(€B'LLP
r'/"./h{
-:-t:--:---r*--:--
Doti cl fl".r
A.chrrcd
-
roft br '\9 cotpLlion of
L.., ?
**h*Ea
770333e31o uLrrMArrffi,;I;*'PAGE OI
Proposal
$rrorl
proFgrrr lo |r,,rn,:t ..t rlr mok:rrch ond pttlnr- 2l: tl3 lo!,o, 9cl.ea.atD€_. ,A-_(pSS lltol ttltrr .p
ond
ord
the obc"t
:o,nprls;6f
-€;.ran-----e-W
.-o' ! ro he :crto,-ed ;n o<iord5ncr with thr drow,ngr,n c rubloniiol *o,lrmoniikc ,nonnl, lor r|l rum ll
Oollorr 1:i-C.t' OO * |
ry.zl Qoz- ^-3 ,a-/,..i-3f2\.#.""":;rn'
-21% <4?3e.-'? .L
ltrpe<tfuliy
Nofc .- lhir p',ogorol oor, hr '.i{r I r'-. [y vr ,[ nor c<ccprsl ,^,;11.1;n /) aop
ACC:FIANCt Or PIOFOSATIhc oborc prirrt. .prcili<or,onr ,",{ .orrditionr orr rotirlqctol qnd erp herqt), q,::qpre.j
r,recu||d calt ep9^ wrrlttn ordorr, Ond -ill
.pon rtriler, atcidantr or ddoyr bryond ovr
. Wc,!-cn'l Cornprarotioa and P.rblic
f61, c'p 6erh6rilsd to de thl wo,l
rprcificd. Poymo"r -,ll br modo,.,i .trl,aqrl obovc.
^,,,c,,4 . &{il !:. lf f'f-
Tropcrd Nc.
lhel t{r.
*,. ct/t/r 7
Worl lo lr Frriornrd Af
AI' r.t'4 &1_ ztxl- x.t1fuL.-
JOJA ,n' tl. rlbtr. o4,g..
Oon- lignqrerq
o
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made an
ona C R ascvian /, /p iz. lr o
made.and entered into this 27 aay ot MR"/rc32 oyA I. -- - r -'--endamongW(hereinafterca||edthe''Develope/'),andthe TOWN
OF VAIL (hereinatter called the "To,rn').
''1
WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condiiion of approval of the C RosSrt*V ''4'z y'*;t
plans, dated 5 - Zz .19fl wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the
judgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion oi certain improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
following:
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit with the Town of Vail in a dollar arnount
total cost of the work shown below) to provide security
4
loao'n-'
a
Cnssttr") uhi+( o,*c-
' ..':.. .,.:.. CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT .' .
Legal Description: Lot; glock
-Subdivision Fi[no
oate of ExpiraTn --
ACdress:
-
Account Nurnber: 0 1 -0000-22026
of
IMPFOVEMENT.
(rosouoi* rtvsuBiC%Ssv: tru {y'l;t- PgB
-Zq'-lis PLA,\/ F/|.D $)ma-.z F0< wtck/G(V{
/mcueo H€.etrr r
sw
T*/
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Develope,
"gr..., at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and material-lecjlsary to perform and complete all improvements, on or before
Y - | s - n'/ . The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the community Development Department, the Town oi Vail, and to do all work
incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
Such other designs, dralvings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
t0 the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or olher
official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
t^l+ ix tl,,-.^- ni tq
bLqo'
"-1*i'' : ''',
SOLO TO
PINE LANE NURSERY
12E59 N. Pinc Lanc St.
Parkcr, Coloiado S0li+
30J-S1l-3009
4 7581
' ' q:.;r "+ r:'
:ji!j.;: .. . .
'I
Ii
I
Zylt.)o {)r,,.^,.^,rJ
SUB TOTAL
Delivery
Tax
Planting
TOTAL
Sr:ir
'' 'l-,-;i:ffi;,#ii;
.:" i
r,r,"
,...sr'
: t-{..{cF
F
o
o
r1.l
ul
r|t
cr
fft
l-l
J
l-l
ul
dI
=
.-
z
Hz
t.:
oz
3d9<Fr aoza.u
fd
oz=-rl '(x
H
s)
o
!9 ts
.:- Fafr P5
FRarrU-|J]ot
= Fiw2-@d =.la= ^! \Ey68 t ... :o
3<;c? :J H c\lE6g '!<>. t-i tJ rrt<o
3
\
Fz
oo
5.=o
=9_ff Bsg
b 3FB
ru 9xi
E ff55FO_
=UI
a
Fl
3r
av:
!-{ci\a\
TDBB1 rd
HHtaZ>
tf t'\ 16
&1 crJ c,)g'0..zoz
F 01 couolZ oro 4fY w ?r; -r=-?EX or r:1 . OO: cl1 H4-rzUl co> E<J -tC,)O FlO o('JFlo
< f-FO,4 Efu o\oc,Z$O
r, 6 UO Or!,;i-r..',ddv\8....3
llj .o EtdnoJ N CJFI El < arF \ -rrl>(,C)E 'rl..lEl Dr{ t/): O lt U,@Ll &l
E,
UJF
U'
l&tisrta
r,,l.i:, rI . , i:,t,.' ,. li.
'i1r6,, , .r:. i' .. ,
,f+f;f.Svl''':'. '/,t..\' . -
l '; F,,"'r , ll, . ..
z
tro-
Eoatlt
F
_6
zotr
Eoa
IJJo
F
F
zotr
Eoa
uJo
F
s
zoF.L
Eoatr,
F(rf
z
r
E
U)uj
F
cc
tr
T t-:tl
Ir Ilo IIn Ilo I
l"ltltlIt-to Ito Itil |tft |t8 |t8 |
l3 |tltlt-ttltll€ rl .ollil 1lo[olmllc?to[otfdl -I ll ctlllllllltll-- lF-lllI'lrcf-lo Il€ |Itr |ttto I
tq Il" It-t-tltlol1lfilTItl| tJ$ l"
H-F{; l-"J'l*
=7=f =ot ot orI EI Ecrl El EOI OI Ofrl 3,1 frol ,<ol o
FI FI FtYt 11' I tYSLSLf
'l!,
fr$d..l!ioOr-42
d?zuto
1
fiuJtiox=
JZJr-s?
H86?
tz
,.,9
v.z
EII,J
x
uJ
uloo<olrT
r tll59
i
(r
r- lll
HgElz
coQ
a
=z:f
>oEg
EH66
=9
tt
En
{,(o
E:Pottorc Ed,.c oN;6{
ris
UJz>
(rJ<r!ul(r*o>u.-('i:<
><cErruL!8.5-o
9tr6)o-az<+oitr?-/'\tr<tr
r\G
o
cd
{o
r\o
sr
N
.0o
cool!
n
('Jof\
Nqfs
r
z
5
6Id
z
E
6IF-
6
z
tri
oo
oz
UJ
u,
d
oo
rt)oaz< ulHO Fctc >HJ Ff -lHUI J ttl -{3(} { r{sl<[t UJ.OF rtr (r .OJZ{ tr OJCO-t ltlA>O!-.O-tl@ JE]J(,(fHL (D O Jlt ->u z3 0HIO lll:< C) O|!zFu oqFEBlf <o3EO - ll|o- lrlz {lrJ3^ r{ UIOS(}ff-.U)< F\nlZF-1..) ttUlDlrl
nooz
tlJ
Pctg)
zooaJ
<tzn
a
l-t
ut
-Juuo
uJ
z
U>(r
lll
f,
.D
cig
E(.)
ul
tl
q
Eo
I!
sl
-
o
=ZY
F;,I
Od-91>f
;t,g
IJI:of
d
5z
u,
d
E
|.Uotr
a
I
Otrf(L
.8,
lr.l
^ma-l E
-f z
a) l!Adlz>
>z
,..iz
l!
o
luF
uJ(Il
fz
3o
tIJ
o
LU
:1
lrJ
f.
uo'."roirt,
Claimf
(H)
P.O. €
Cost Ctr 1
Vendor
STEVE GENSLER
DisplaY Claims
Batch
Cl,ain Heading
Y Invoicet
Invoice date
Contract€
Gross amount
Due date
Discount date
Discount amt
Display Claims
Batch
Clairn Heading
o8/L3 08:56
t2'1850
099305 Close PO?
TOWN OF VAIL
'tog 471
OT2L6
REF LANDSCAPING
o6 /24 /e7
2,030.96
o6 /24 /e7
DisplaY? (/ ? H cD GL)
50 CCSAP(I) DisPLaY Cl-aims
Claim€ L27850 Batch
(H) Claim Heading
P.o.€ 099305 Close PO? Y Invoice€
Cost Ctr 1 TOWN OF VAIL Invoice date
vendor l|g47 I contract€
STEVE GENSLER Gross amount
c/o PARKWOOD REALTY Due date
SZgg OtC BLVD., SUITE 500 Discount date
ENGLEWOODTCO 8011, 1 Discount amt
(CD) Clain DescriPtion
Lnt DescriPtion
OO1 LANDSCAPE REFUND
C/O PARKWOOD REALTY
52gg Drc BLVD., surTE 500
ENGLEWOOD,co 80111
Calendar Yr 9'l month 6
Hold code
Bank code TOV
Check number 114046
Check date O6/26/97
Special code
Separate check
Mode:
Valid modes are:
Add Change Del-ete
50 ccsAP( 1)
CIain€
(H)
Source document tYPe
Special remittance instructions
Memo field 1
OLzT6
REF I.,ANDSCAPING
06 /24 /e7
2 t030.96
o6 /24 /e7
f Li-nes: 1
o8/r3 08:56
ACDII-,S. . uPdate /ex:-ru
Undo sort ?heIP../ecorr,sol,tRu123456? . L23456 same as
insert Look Search cOPY Move soRL
L27 850 012l- 6
08/13 08:56
.J:aP.O.'[ "''coit ctr 1
Vcndor
oee3os croJPoa v
TOWN OF VAIL
r09471
rnvoiceE *", tcAPrNG
rnvoice date 06/24/97
Contractg
Gross amount 2,O30'96
Due date 06/24/97
Discount date
Discount amt
STEVE GENSLER
c/o PARKWOOD REALTY
5299 DTc BLVD., surTE
ENGLEWOOD,co 80111
(cD)
Lnt
001
Claim DeecriPtion
Deecription
I.,ANDSCAPE REFUND
500
(GL)
Mode:
Valid modes are:
Add Change Delete
Lnf GL
001 01
GL Account
Account
0000 22026 000
€Lines: 1
. /AcDrLsoMRUL23456? .
Insert Look Search
Distribution Anount 1099
2,030.96 N
123456 Eame as ACDILS. 'update /extE
cOpy Move EoRt undo-sort ?he1P'
RffiYW
IOV.CO|\/|[/I,DEV.DEPT.W
REAL ESTATE
- Fax Cover Sheet -
8t13t97
1
Robert Ullman
770-333-9311
C. Lee Rimel
Crossview
Thank you for the letter to George Ruther. George advises
approximately $2000 of the $6290 has already been released
to Steve Gensler, George said for work already done on A & B.
this confused me since the Escrow Agreement for landscaping
is specific to B & C. George will ask Town of Vail accounting to
clarify.
Also, I am advised that B & B, should you choose them to do
the asphalt work, do not warranty any work performed after
October 1st. Therefore it is essential asphalting be immediately
ordered to assure installation before this deadline. Probably
other asphalt companies have the same provision.
cc: George Ruther
Steve Gensler
Tib Bidgood
't- l, " R irl, I t'.. pl"
Date:
Pages:
To:
Fax Phone:
From:
Subject:
Telephone
970 476 2427
Fccsimik
970 476 2658
Bridge Street at
Vail Yillage Office
230 Brid6e Sheet
Vail ColoraJo
81657
Ouit
I
&
lTIMA
HOLDINGS. L.L.C.
August 13,1997
Mr. George Ruther
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Crossview at Vail - Developer Improvement Agreements
DearMr. Rutler:
Thank you for your letter dated August 4, 1997 .I am agreeable to what was outlined in your letter
regarding the paving and landscape completion dates, as well as the release ofthe $6,290 currently
held in escrow.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
Robert M. Ulknann
cc: Tib Bidgood
Lee Rimel
2255 CUMBERLAND PARKWAY
BUILDING 7OO
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339
I
770-333-9000 FAX 770-333-9311
t-
I'
I
I
I
5l:lElui
!l
EIIrul
lbl
9i
I
g
€
u
a
EIu
a
g
!+c
ttl
trl4(t, t
=rz!=i3
IJJHF2ZLfi t!UTEold04 Irl(J0(10.5r
FF>tZFH
F- r!oi>(IO3UH*!nF
g
'5
.1
0a
v4/\aL-.,n f[rTc-5l'
it,
{,dtt-|!EL}
{9
Clt
EEg
n n$
v
^.I 5'of
=E gIsH 5 F
[3 E;EE
r.E$(J
l
0l
g
H(f,4EHssVs:sdss 5s
=$
unz
Efg s, g rg,E i: F
F i$l Er{ ,€.,
H,sf;?. .C,oLr
6sJt!
H
lJ1F
z3
{tIFcful.oa
;
.EE!u
I
l
0lS=nuls3E*$H^
$x$'urK 5O-E
l"rtEF
igHEE
t
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
ct
v
i
3
I
3
S=tft r!g5E
H; EH;(\ FFE*r'Ffifi
gEHEE
oa.lrl
EEEE.
a$ i$ZE
Salf, lJ,s5Ern uI*EE^
*-EEE ? g
ooEeF E 3
ggHEE
:
E
I
Il14lNt..r-lnlJ E Slx Ilc o
In tAi' Birr frt0
=loiz Et3 r ht0 &*I F TI rf,i'
I
i!
t4t)
\ot
or
C9
I
I
t
I
iJ flr olr Hirr f
l0 ?
t3 I
.t 0th
I
I
I
a.
t!o.
Ithf.lI
-.-T'
!
(\nJrsrt']3
Lfr0:
IT.tUa .",3ak0iF Ytt
tf,,G
an{m€DI{-n r- |-rl :n -rl ,-ioLEFr t; =-O<F...- {zlil]rri N l-: -idrrr cc m5...':d \ /'ta. xl ...'F- Y-n ,'t ,^, .- .r rl.i>;.o; mfr >O<-t Dt!-nc o- =V)- ->l! < rr- m'7*>- c ^r-'] .] . Ffl .. \,.l\ t; Oa )s- a1 - cl> 3'1] :rao rl ,g {--r io '-, 3?O.28c:rtaFl
<7")
;;
€n
--l<:
,1,
a
=x
li-
=';
s.
Jrc (lf,-: ' (tl
:: q)
('l
(f,rrn,,^uni*c 0+4-
CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
Legal Description: Lot
-
Block _,
Subdivision
-.Filing
-D"r" of Expi r"tio-nl-3!:7579-- -Address: _
Account Number: 01-0000-22026
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS-AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
and among @(hereinaf ter call
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the "Town").
n_
ed the
oay ot /VIAY . n3loy
"Developer"), and the TOWN
to guarantee performance of
improvements by means of the
nWHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition of approval of the '- &osSvt€vt'/ 'l'r l/rti s
plans, dated 5 - ZZ- . 1941 wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the
judgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certain improvements
set forth below: and
WHEREAS, lhe Developer wishes to provide collateral
this Agreement, including construction of lhe above-referenced
lollowing:
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit with the Tor@Fzs"/i/rt$e total cost of the work {yn [gpf to
$.,J'
. ii,,iffi"7,:(ff{1 u -}o}- u.*,,/ '/ " {t't'
/. a vovaP i Mr #o^\LS B\Cryqss v L.vv- 47- y''o ; t-'
3 -Zq''45 /La^/ A/lD $)mq-z' F''a wtok'
pawcuto H€-et-T-v r
Ps-e
G{t{
lar amount
e security
[f-'f rt t)t^-,^-7r.-f t.k-*l
sw
Tt;*/
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and material necessary to perform and complete all improvements, on or beforeQ' t 9-atl ' . The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the Community Development Department, the Town of Vail, and to do all work
incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or olher
official from the Town of Vail, as aflected by special districts or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Development Department and Public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee performance of its obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
Page 1 of 3
A cash deposit account in the amount of $to be held by the Town, as
escrow agent, shall provide the security for the improvements set forth above if there is
a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth
above for another form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and lhe performance of the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative collateral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening or occurring to the work specified in
this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the
nature of said work, but all of said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town, and any of its
officers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or delending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize for partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category
of improvement at such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount oi the collateral that is being held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town determines that any of the improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set forth herein by the date set
forth in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall not be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary to complete the unlinished improvements. The
Town shall release such funds upon the written request of the staff of the Community
Development Department stating that the improvements have not been completed as required
by the agreement. The Town shall not require lhe concurrence of the developer prior to the
release of the iunds, nor shall the Town be required to verify independently that the
improvements have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon the request of the Community Development Department.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certilied to the treasurer of Eagle County to be
collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorem taxes levied against such property. lf
the permit holder fails or reluses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning Code.
7. The Developer warrants all work and material for a period of one year after
acceptance of all work referred to in this Agreement by the Town pursuant to Section
17.16.250 if such work is located on Town of Vail property or within Town of Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties
time to time, provided that
hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
such amendments be in writing and executed by all parties hereto.
year lirst above written.Dated the day and
Page 2 of 3
t , (,\tJrlJJlr
STATEOFCOLORADO )
Wllnosr my hand and olficlal 9eai.
tly commisston .ro'r"., 9l 15 | 4 v
STATE OF COLOFAOO
COUI.ITY OF EAGLE
My Eommbsion
lDCrlra ttG:r
Itr.I IlnH T I-|',II\{IJ LLI.,
:EvrErt C/i'0S.:.v,!L^. ,4-r- kn/LF,] t61s,tr!4s' vh1n 1e,:8,ZNc. 6 3'w.ir. = -- .)-.-, .-f,-',1 3.s{'i5- L ti !,'1A.vt tleZ<. pt4tf
Pri. t cl3
Th. ror€grl4g .Devoloper
UT
I
I
PINE LANE NURSERY
12859 N. Pine Lane St.
Parker, Colorado 80134
303-841-3009
SOLD TO
C RtStVtFw PPlPfu rV s
47581
DEL IVERY
Zrlt.)o [)aro..v-e.[
SUB TOTAL
Delivery
Tax
Planling
TOTAL
cRoSSYlEw t"or*",8, rnd,C, spRlNK"rolororn"
TO: Mr. Steve Gensler
c/o Crossview at Vail, Ltd. and
Parkview Realy, Inc.
7752Oak View Place
Castle Rock, CO. 80104
660-8041, Fax688-2273
WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT:
FROM:Evan DeMuth
Lawn Sprinkler Specialists
P.O. Box 1532
Avon, CO, 81620
(97 0) 9 49 -5857, P ager 949 -7 400, Fax 949 -0392
Crossview at Vail, Buffehr Creek, Vail, CO.
We hereby propose to fumish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of the
installation of a six (6) zone automatic sprinkler system including the following list of components and
conditions: Replace the existing mainline and drip "stubs" with six (6) Rainbird DV-I00 electric control valves
set inside Ametek valve boxes and connected with dry splice wire connectors to the existing controller for
automatic coverage of the landscape around Buildings 'B' and 'C.' l " Dura unionized valve manifolds will be
used. 1" polyethylene zoneline (Eagle, NSF 80#), poly insert fittings, and stainless steel crimp clamps. A
combination of Hunter PGP - Adjustable gear drive rotor heads and Rainbird 4" popup spray heads will
provide coverage to all construction disturbed areas. An extension of the existitg drip zone will water the trees
and shrubs. Valve boxes will be set flush to final grade as will all heads via 3/8" swing pipe assemblies. All
trenches are to be backfilled and tamped so as to prevent settling. Winterization of the iystem in the Fall of
1996 and Spring 1997 startup, repair and adjustment will be an additional charge, over and above this estimate.
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra costs, wilt be executed only upon
written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above this estimate. Workman's Compensation 1nd$l Million Liability Insurance on the above work to be taken out by Lawn Sprinkler Specialistsjlnc. Atl
material is guaranteed to be as specified and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sun of
Three thousand dollars ($3000.00). payments are to be made as follows: The edljre balance is due within ten
(10)daysfromthebillingdateforprojectcompletion. Pastdueamountsaresubjecttooneandonehatfpercent
(15%) per month and a minimum service charge of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per month,
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above specifications andpaylrent terrns are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are
authorized to do the work pending final /"" 97
Date Signature
Respectfully
A--r/ .1t+-
\lfo',-. tfr^-.^-J
l
I
o{m€
T{
FE$I
9B;q
6EgH
=
'l-
mooCzI
\o{
ts(,
\o
r\o
ts
9d sHIrfio.n
6HX
rl
chl,zo
H€
iE
z
trIFI
zHz
tc,Fl
F<
0)
€ogz
.rl
I,
Er
o
rtl
LNrr
ljl
tso
ru
tso
IJJ
J
JI
JI
Lp
tn
IJL.Io
r,tlo
a{m€D!{trlFtD(nrd o :
t/J tqt C cq P' ut 3O O< Fr-... {,d lrtt tsrO N 1-o E{ro fE O m2,.,.n\,i."58;" G iOctZro(o\o mF DO\t{ Dtrt F't (/) o oE{ C'(/, l-. Fl, tD <ur inzPIrH\OH8.EF UOF'' - C3r OE ZEO6i0 {H'dHOzozEo(,(ntE@oN<Zt-tHHtrt tljEr
I,
'J ET
F:l
t,H
trr
oF
I
3sA C'Iur (rI
H
l5F HsrE\OA\oo{
tr>o\=-o c::z
C:*tsnlo\
3E s.
Eo Ofcn. ('l1= (D
;* ql
EE s.cudty Lsturer Indro.o. O.,rrn - *c$ 3
THISAGREEMENT, made and entered into
and among @(neieinarter
OF VAIL (hereinafter called the "Town").
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Cnssvit"l uni*< o*c-
CASH DEPOSIT FORMAT
Legal Description: Lot ,r Block
-Subdivision Filino
O"r" or Er.pirlio-n ll
Account Number: 0 1 -0000-22026
day of fifl,ov
"Developer"),and the TOWN
hisZJ
called the
WHEREAS, the Developer, as
plans, dated 5- ?z- , Pr17
Agreement; and
a condition of approval of the 'Rossvt6v,/ '*t y'ftit
wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in the
judgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for completion of certain improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvements by means of the
following:
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit with the Town ol Vail in a dollar amount
ot.W025"/qilAnetota|co3toftheworkshownbelow)toprovideSecUrity
^ r'o "
n
fou,ifw: ozffi x 5 apr'/r
\)'- - iMpnovelrrgrur tL'
,/auot^oiruu #ousu'r]1(ry6\sv;tw 5- y'n; u PsR
3-Zq'-tts PLa^/ Avb gl^o't'-er'- iA, Grtd
pnnc*zo dset-T-r o
0w
T;-/
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Develope, "gr".., at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and material necgssary to perform and complete all improvements, on or beforeI - t I - a-7 - . The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the Community Development Department, the Town of Vail, and to do all work
incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of, and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other
official from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
U,f fi^ t)r"-o.^..
A cash deposit account in the amount of $to be held by the Town, as
escrow agent, shall provide the security for the improvements set lorth above if there is
a default under the Agreement by Developer.
3. The Developer may at any time substitute the collateral originally set forth
above lor another form of collateral acceptable to the Town to guarantee the faithful
completion of those improvements referred to herein and the performance ol the terms of this
Agreement. Such acceptance by the Town of alternative collateral shall be at the Town's sole
discretion.
4. The Town shall not, nor shall any oflicer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible lor any accident, loss or damage happening or occuring to the work specified in
this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the same, nor shall the Town, nor
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason of the
nature of said work, but all of said liabilities shall and are hereby assumed by the Developer.
The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harrnless the Town, and any of its
oificers, agents and employees against any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities to which the
Town or any of its officers, agents or employees may become subject to, insofar as any such
losses, claims, damages or liabilities (or actions in respect thereof) that arise out of or are
based upon any performance by the Developer hereunder; and the Developer shall reimburse
the Town for any and all legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by the Town in
connection with investigating or delending any such loss, claim, damage, liability or action.
This indemnity provision shall be in addition to any other liability which the Developer may
have.
5. lt is mutually agreed that the Developer may apply to the Town and the Town
shall authorize for partial release of the collateral deposited with the Town for each category
of improvement at such time as such improvements are constructed in compliance with all
plans and specifications as referenced hereunder and accepted by the Town. Under no
condition will the amount of the collateral that is beino held be reduced below the amount
necessary to complete such improvements.
6. lf the Town determines that any of the improvements contemplated herein are
not constructed in compliance with the plans and specifications set forlh herein by the date set
forth in paragraph 2, the Town may, but shall not be required to, withdraw from the cash
deposit such funds as may be necessary to complete the unfinished improvements. The
Town shall release such funds upon the written request of the staff of the Community
Development Department stating that the improvements have not been completed as required
by the agreement. The Town shall not require the concurrence of the developer prior to the
release of the funds, nor shall the Town be required to verify independently that the
improvements have not been completed as required by this Agreement, but shall release such
funds solely upon the request of the Community Development Department.
lf the costs of completing the work exceed the amount of the deposit, the excess,
together with interest at twelve percent per annum, shall be a lien against the property and
may be collected by civil suit or may be certified to the treasurer of Eagle County to be
collected in the same manner as delinquent ad valorern taxes levied against such property. lf
the permit holder fails or refuses to complete the cleanup and landscaping, as defined in this
chapter, such failure or refusal shall be considered a violation of the Zoning Code.
7. The Developer warrants all work and material for a period of one year alter
acceptance of all work referred to in this Agreement by the Town pursuant to Section
17.16.250 if such work is located on Town of Vail property or within Town of Vail right-of-way.
8. The parties hereto mutually agree that this Agreement may be amended from
time to
lT"1l" l"':::''::: ::':*:"":" 'writins
and executed bv a' parties hereto'
41.,S:,'1til84.'''':'i
STATE OFCOLOMDO )
) s8.
COUNWOFEAGLE i
srATE OF @LORAOO )
) sB.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
9arra $!aa.
Wllncss my hand and o ichl goai.
Paar 3 cl3
PINE LANE NURSERY
12859 N. Pine Lanc St.
Parkcr, Colorad o 80134
303-841-3009
4 7581
OELIVEEY
PHONE
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
t
I
i
IiI
I
I
I
I
L__
7at -
ZYlt.)o [)r,t^,.^,-ed
SUB TOTAL
Delivery
Tax
Planting
TOTAL
cRossvt#ButLDrNG'8, and,c, spRrNKrt roonoro,
FROM:TO: Mr. Steve Censler
c/o Crossview at Vail, Ltd. and
Parkview Realty, Inc.
7752Oak View Place
Castle Rock, CO. 80104
660-8041, Fax688-2273
WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT:Crossvierv at Vail, Buffehr Creek, Vail, CO.
We hereby propose to fumish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of the
installation of a six (6) zone automatic sprinkler system including the following list of components and
conditions: Replace the existing mainline and drip "stubs" with six (6) Rainbird DV-l00 electric control valves
set inside Ametek valve boxes and connected with dry splice wire connectors to the existing controller for
automatic coverage of the landscape around Buildings 'B' and 'C.' 1" Dura unionjzed valve manifolds will be
used. I " polyethylene zoneline (Eagle , NSF 80#), poly insert fittings, and stainless steel crimp clamps. A
combination of Hunter PGP - Adjustable gear drive rotor heads and Rainbird 4" popup spray heads rvill
provide coverage to all construction disturbed areas. An extension ofthe existirg drip zone rvill water the trees
and shrubs. Valve boxes will be set flush to tlnal grade as rvill all heads via 3/8" srving pipe assemblies. All
trenches are to be backfilled and tamped so as to prevent settling. Winterization of the system in the Fall of
1996 and Spring 1997 startup, repair and adjustmen[will be an additional charge, over and above this estimate.
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon
rwitten orders, and will become an extra charge over and above this estimate. Workman's Compensation lnd$l Million Liability Insurance on the above rvork to be taken out by Lawn Sprinkler Specialists, Inc. All
material is guaranteed to be as specified and completed in a substantial rvorkrnanlike manner for the surn of
Three thousand dollars ($3000.00). payments are to bc made as follows: The edire balance is due within ten
(10) days from the billing date for project completion. Past due amounts are subject to one and one halfpercent
(1 .5%) per month and a minimum service charge of trventy-five dollars ($25.00) per month.
ACCEPTANCf, OF PROPOSAL
The above specifications andpaytnent terms are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are
authorized to do the work pending final
Date Signature
Respectfully S
Evan DeMuth
Lawn Sprinkler Specialists
P.O. Box 1532
Avon, CO. 81620
(970) 949-5857, P ager 949-7 400, Fax 949-0392
q.*^-zl[L'^,tk_i-/ .1t+-
],?fo',-" t'sa*-.^^-J
t
. . €JgSrr:E
3cOFc1;
c
F
LN
o.
O s.csrdt leat!r.. lndrd.d- oo;rr or! uaf
9d IH+!ao
@
HXFl
OFIstczo cOu)Fr 3,z
H€:r€
11
tF
zo
/v
Lr_,I
zHz
trtFl
0,
ts
\>nN) |Ti E-r.Gf{\],tsxr0@
{
cfr
LN
ulrr
tn
F
c]
rL,
tstf
Ltt
J]
J]
UJ
ul
llJo
LNo
l.
I
II
II
I
I
I
'I
Ii
I
?
I
Ii
II
I
I
IIII
t
I
I
!
I
i
1
i
i
at-lm
{
IJt{ F.tD(nrq o :coFCtrlP.(J|=oo<trrr.:. -{,U lrf{ E{O N l-o F{ro rq o mE.. .. ,o \ r.itrrtd...'r- ='rtOO(') \o rl
QftZN \o \o mF 3rO{{ >trt tri ut o otrr trr@I" Fl, cE <ur inZr-l,t{ \O ^88'gF Uo.)r ,u cl, org zvooto {HFHOzo zEa(,.flvtooru<24HHtlr ttE@
a
m€
7
I-r
-etsi
F93 in
PE;9
EEE g
-d3 6)- iTtoocz{
{c
),r:l-l
'-t
(-r
-R'
Es'g
}.(tl
UI
cD(tl
I
o.
t\)
c)+tsx
cr
=U F.JLo gl
,_.r . (tl1: o,;* sl
Evan DeMuth
l..awn Sprinkl€r Speoiali3ts
PO Box 15i!2 Arcn, CO
Ersm-1532 (970)949€Es7
Pager949-7400 Fax 9,19.0392
l lnvoice
DATE |l,tvotcE #
8t5197 2556
BILL TO
Sleve Gensler
c/o Crossvieur at Vail, Ltd. &
Parkview Realty, Inc.
7752 Oak View Place
Castle Rock, CO 80104
P.O. NO.TERMS PRO,IECT
Steve Due on receipt
QUANTIry OESCRIPTION RATE AMOUT.IT
(08/04197) 80% Completion of sprinkler installation per agreement.
*ort;
./
Foobd *
o+rcaJ
$u--,-A1
V.!a 4UbF1
' i"q'*S-g'
2,400.00
'r*n, 4
#@z*
Total $2,400.@
c/o Crossview at Vail, Ltd. and
Parkview Realty, Inc.
7752 Oak View Place
Castle Roclg CO. 80104
660-8041, Fax688-2273
WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT:
Lawn Sprinkler Specialists
P.O. Box 1532
Avon, CO. 81620
(970) 949-5857, Pager 949-7 400, F ax 949-0392
; * r,"". o.::"o,tsvl'w T"T."r"' ""'':::ffiER lf'PosAL
We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of theinstallation of a six (6) zone automatic sprinkler system including the following liit of components andconditions: Replace the existing mainline and drip "stubs" with iix (6) Rainbird DV-100 electric control valvesset inside Ametek valve boxes and connected with dry splice wire connectors to the existing controller forautomatic coverage of the landscape around Buildingi 'd' and 'c., I " Dura unionized valve manifolds will beused' l" polyethylene zolghne (Eagle, NSF 80#), poly insert fittings, and stainless steel crimp clamps. Acombination of Hunter PGP - Adjustable gear drive rotor heads and Rainbird 4" popup spray heads willprovide cov€rage to all construction disturbed areas. An extension of the existing in'pzone will water the treesand shrubs. Valve boxes witl be set flush to final grade as will all heads via 3i8" srving pipe assemblies. Alltrenches are to be backfilled and tamped so as to prevent settling. Winterization of the system in the Fall of1996 and Spring 1997 startup, repair and adjustrnent will be an additional charge, ou.. und above this estjmate.Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only uponwritten orders, and will become an exffa charge over and above this estimate. workman's Compensation and$1 Million Liability Insurance on the above work to be taken out by Lawn Sprinkler Specialists, Inc. Allmaterial is guaranteed to be as specified and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum ofThree thousand dollars ($3000.00). Payrnents are to be made as follows: The entire balance is due within ten
!]oJ aavs from the billing date for project completion. Past due amounts are subject to one and one halfpercent(r.5o/o) per month and a minimum service charge of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per month.
Crossview at Vail, Buffehr Creek, Vait, CO.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above specifications and payment terms are satisfactory and are hereby accepted-You areauthorized to do the work pending final
/!
Date l= z/- ,t7 Signature
il*(17
RespectfullyL*
o TILE COPT
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970-479-2452
Department of Contmunity Developrnent
Augrrst 4. 1997
N{r. Robcrt Ullman
Crossvicw at Vail
2255 Cumbcrland Parkway, Bldg. #700
Atlanto. Ccorgia 60339
Rc: Crossviov ai Vail Dcvclopcr ltnprovcmcnt Agrcclncllts
Dcar Mr. [Jllrnan:
On Tlrurs6ay. July 24.I997. I rnct with Lcc Rimcl and Tib Bidgood to discuss thc cornplction of thc
outstarrding sitc improvcmcnts at Crossvicw at Vail. As you arc awarc. two Dcvclopcr Improvcmcnt
Agrccrncnis sccurc thc conrplction of thc outstanding improvcincnts. Thc agrcclncnts covcr thc
paving <lf thc drivcway and thc landscaping on Lots "8" and "C"'
'I'lrc agrccrncnt tirr thc cornplction of thc drivcrvay paving is schcdulcd to cxpirc on August 15. lc)91 .
I do 1ot bclicvc thc paving will bc cornplctcd by thc cxpiration dalc. As such. thc Torvn is agrccablc
to cxtcn{ing thc cxpiration dalc to Octobcr l. 1997. Thc additional timc will allow you to complctc
lhc paving as rcquircd. Upon an inspcction of thc complctcd paving. thc Town will rclcasc thc
$ l(r.662.50 hcld in cscrow.
Thc aglccrncnt fbl thc contplction of thc landscaping is schcdulcd to cxpirc on Scptcmbcr | 5. 1997.
'l'6c Torvn will not cxtcnd this agrccmcnt. 'Ihc amount of work ncccssary to complctc thc
lantlscaping is minimal and ncccls to bc complctctt by thc prcviously agrccd upon a datc. Upon an
inspcction of thc completcd larrdscaping, thc Town will rclcasc thc $6,290.00 currcntly hcld in
cscfow.
Shoufrl you have any questions or conccrns, plcasc do not hcsitatc to give tnc a call at970-479-2145'
t am happy to answcr any qucstions you may havc.
Sinccrclv.ffi
Torvn Planncr
cc. Tib Bidgood
Lec Rimel
\
{g rt*t"o'u'*
tS
July 29,1997
George Ruther
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear George:
Confirming our meeting last Thursday, there were three areas of concem:
l. The Asphalt Developer Improvement Agreement with $16,662.50 in
escrow expires 8115197. You are going to write a letter to the developer
extending it until l0ll/97. This gives adequate time to complete all drainage
work, retaining walls and the foundation for "G". Therefore, all healy
equipment usage will be complete eliminating the possibility of damage to
new asphalt. Please direct this letter to the developer:
RobertUllman
Crossview at Vail
2255 Cumberland Parkway, Bldg #700
Atlanta, GA 60339
with a cc to: Tib Bidgood
T.I.B., lncorporated
9959 So. Turkey Creek Road
Morrisor; CO 80485
and a cc to myself.
2. The Landscaping Developer Improvement Agreement with $6,290 in
escrow is specific to homes "B" and "C", with a completion date of 9/15197.
SOTIIEBYS
II{TDI]IATIOXAL TE LTY
'fl'e RiiL r l'eop lc
TeLephone
970 476 2421
F ocsimile
970 476 2658
Bridge Street at
VaiL ViIIage Office
23O Bridde Street
Vuil C"lo."do
8r657
&\ait
REAL ESTATE
-!o
Page2
Ruther
3. You adviscd the Landscape Plan plus the Materials List attached
hereto specif the town's completion requirements for all landscaping at
Crossview. I will make nre all parties have appropriate copics.
George, ngain thank you for assistance.
cLR/jt
cc: Robertulltnan
TibBidgood
Srcve Gensler
LIST OF MATERIALS
l.tefrg or pRoJE-cr | *z
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT
STREET ADDRESS:.
suBDIVISIoll XEH\IA|J r/r.1ftl,g.BLOCK
The following information is required for subrnittal to the DesignReview Board before a final proval can be given:aI
BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
S i ri i nrr
Ot.her ?talI Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck
Flues
Rails
Flashings
. Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
LANDSCAPING: Name of
PE OF MATERIAL,il
Des igner :-Fhnna.
--l z)
W \ tr LLzj,a '^ _.zL)Llu'
deciduous trees.deciduous trees is 2 inches.lndicate Minimum caliper forheight for coniferous
PLANT MATERTALS : j _ ge!_qniqe ]__Name.
PRoPoSED rREEs : Etflfr=.f.-
EXISTING TREES
BE REMOVED W.-*&.p"i_.-pn)LAt<> '- "AtEv,fFoll
Ouantity Size*
lzt- r 4
' 4 lr'l'lzl
-?|4alle / t-ftl
4t
a*J W.E4*-I -
1,4- +ee'-tD6.(\P€V.lV11hA6l
trees. Minimum h
;ffiwffil1o Cgr'9*e Recei-''- Developme"IQS:,:ffi"::'-""t*
| 0V - C0ill[{" [)EV. DEPL**X"fi ;ltHo'ffifll3ii*"oo"
(PLEASE PRINTA. APPLICAI{T
APPLIqATION FOR Pg-h L.l l.nwl.yi^1T"
S.rr" eche^.{ rr, - tc**
MATLTNG eponnss f:/1 )tc ts/-J * ja,
B. PROPERTY
OIINER' S SIGIIATI'RI
MAILTNG ADDRESS
LOCATION OF PROPOSAI:
D.APPLICATION FEE S1OO. OO
MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED:
FILING
' hq r<-k
srREEr ADDRE'' /'llo $r4,+bFre, i: 6,o,.^ 6b,,^ 1.,^.51 rj"r C
9',;n t\< /
earo-!tu]- cHEcK * loo4 Tq&.,7#;,-
L. Two mylar copies and one paper copy, of the subdivision platshall be submitted to the Department of Community Development.
The plat. shall include the fol_lowing:
,/. The final plat shal1 be drawn by a registered. surveyor inIndia ink, or other substantial solution, on a reproduciblemedium (preferably rnylar) with dimension of t.wenty-four bythirt.y-six inches and shal1 be at a scale of one hundredfeet to one inch or larger with margins of one and one-hatfto two inches on the 1eit and one-hilf inch on all othersides.
.b. Accurate dimensions to the nearest one-hundredth of a footfor alL lines, angles and curves used to describeboundaries, streets, setbacks, alteys, easements,structures, areas to be reserved or dedicated for public or
conmon uses and other important features. All curves shal1be circular arcs and shall be defined by the radius, central
angJ.e, are scored distances and bearing. AII dimensions,both linear and angular, are to be determined by an accuratecontrol survey in the fietd which must balance and closewithin a limit of one in ten thousand.
.4 North arrow and graphic scale.
-a,{. A systemat.ic identification of all existing and proposedbui"Idings, units, lots, blocks, and names for all streets.
.* An identification of the streets, al1eys, parks, and otherpublic areas or facilities as shown on the plat, and adedication Lhereof to the public use. en identification ofthe easements as shown on the plat and a grant thereof tothe 9t:b1 ie trse. Arpeq rqgclzerl for fU+,Ure publ:Cacquisition shall also be shown on the plat.
A written survey description of the area including the totalacreage to the nearest appropriate significant figure. Theacreage of each lot or parcel shall be shown in this manneras well.
A description of aLl survey monuments, both found and set,,which mark the boundaries of the subdivision, and adescription of all monuments used in conducting the survey.
Monument perimeter per Colorado statut.es. Two perimet.er
monuments shall be established as major control monuments,the materiaLs which shall be determined by the townengineer.
r_5€,-i-:.r-i:<ry -, -.. -\t
L O T__-BLOCK_S UBD I VI S I Oft_.lLdsr
o
T0lrtFl 0F Utrl I l-
Hiscel laneous Cash
AF-Erl-'r6 I3t72t47
ReceiPt * 1996S?
ii.."""t + cr'' +-lBB4
Ei'i':.:-'i iett flT r.rsIL\'SuBD I tr I s I BN
ilI;,;'i';;J.'.0 ) tss'ss
Iterr Paid hount Paid
glB66S413366gB rBg'AeJ
Change re t'u rne'l ,' tl' EB
THFTHK VGU
'.lc,u r cashi er .rLlDY
o
IiL%*:Hfl""
DRAINAGE STUDY
FOR
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
VAIL, COT,ORADO
PREPARED FOR
STEVE GENSLER
5299 DTC BOULEVARD, SUITE 5OO
ENGLEI{OOD, COLORADO, 80111
&g:f,iir;***:. '.
<i,f '", 1t* . :.* "_
4,. .. ,
., .f4{r6rr2Ocl ''' '
.t'; feraOvres*A fl..13'
PROJECT NO. 943818
l,tAY, t994
REVISED JULY, 1995
77MetcalfRoad,#201 . Box978 . Avon,colorado81620. Phone:970'949'5072'FromDenverDirect893-1531
1420Vancestreet.Lakewood.Co|orado80215.Phone:303.232.0158
Tor{,'v r ff.-t copy
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I s9
FAX 303-479-2452
March 16, 1995
Mr. Randy Hodges
JR Architects, Inc.
P.O. Box 1297
Dillon, CO 80435
Dear Randy:
Below is a summary of the issues raised at the Design 1"y,9* Board (DRB) meeting held on
Wednesday, March .15, 1995. The issues raised Oy Ine O^ne members should be addressed
;y y;r;;if ;r St*" Genster at the time of final review. Cunen1y, final review for the
pio'poseO Crossview project is scheduled lor Wednesday, April 5' 1995'
Desion Review Board comments/issues:
1. To create a community-feel to the project, the same exterior stone trealment, and the
same grey color-tones should be used throughout the entire proiect' Please revise the
buildin! eievation and resubmit a color board showing the appropriate changes'
Z. please submit for DRB r€view, architectural detail sketches (i.e. fascia, railing'
stonework, lighting, etc.)'
3. Please review your proposed landscape plan and provide greater attention to the
landscaping atong t-ionbriCge Loop. AUehtion should be made to screen the view from
Lionsridge loop Iown to the rooftops of the units within the proiect'
4.Everyattemptshouldbemadetosavethetreeswhichyouhaveindicatedwi||be
saved by the proposed site plan. Please submit a detailed tree preservation plan for
theentireproject'Ataminimum,lhetregpreservationp|anshou|dincludeatree
preservation map, limits of construction disturbance for each building site' tree
irot"ation fencing, root pruning before excavation il necessary, construction storage
and staging, etc.
Again, each of the items listed above needs to be addressed by yourself or steve Gensler at
the time of final review before the DRB. lf you wish to remain on the agenda for the
wednesday, April 5, tsgS OnS meeting, I will need to see each of the items listed above by
no later than 9:00 a.m., TuesOay, trlarc"n 28, 1995. lf you are unable to meet the deadline
established, please do not hesiiate to call me. I will be more than happy to work with you to
;ffi 6;''th a mutualty agreed upon deadline lor the submittal items.
De paru ne nt of Comnunity Deve lo pnent
o
Mr. Randy Hodges
JR Architects, lnc. $
March 16, 1995
Page 2
I hops the comments and issues addressed in this letter will be helpful in providing you. with
tnJ'necessary information needed to finalize your proiecl for DRB.review. Should you have
any questioni or concerns regarding the comments and issues addressed in this letter' as
;M+, please feel tree to contact me at 479-2138 during regular office hours.
Sincerely,
llt*ta-R'**--t
George Ruther
Town Planner
\lrd
Subdivision
Dale of Expiration:
Address: IJ,FD e
DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
and among.4
THIS AGREEMENT.made and entered into this Z"D day of E_. . j9a: by
(hereinafter called the 'Developer"), and the TOWN
WHEREAS, the Developer, as a condition oi approval of the Cloa.ta,J k tlttt ,te" !f"plans' dated 4+,ur zB ,1991 wishes to enter into a Developer lmprovement
Agreement; anU
WHEREAS, the Developer is obligated to provide security or collateral sufficient in thejudgment of the Town to make reasonable provisions for compleiion of certain improvements
set forth below; and
WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to provide collateral to guarantee performance of
this Agreement, including construction of the above-referenced improvemenis by means of the
following:
OF VAIL (hereinafter called
Developer agrees to establish a cash deposit with the Town of Vail in a dollar amount
of $-lQoO-- (25% ot the total cost of the work shown below) to provide security
for the following:
IMPROVEMENT
f*uosc*etu1 6F t-ors'.e' "f't , (eutian, F fu7oota FfuE.
$rrt
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following mutual covenants and
agreements, the Developer and the Town agree as follows:
1. The Developer agrees, at its sole cost and expenses, to furnish all equipment
and material necessary to per.rorm and complete all improvements, on or before
I-r-rE 15, 1993 The Developer shall complete, in a good workmanlike manner, all
improvements as listed above, in accordance with all plans and specifications filed in the
office of the community Development Department, the Town of Vail, and to do all work
incidental thereto according to and in compliance with the following:
a. Such other designs, drawings, maps, specifications, sketches, and other matter
submitted by the Developer to be approved by any of the above-referenced
governmental entities. All said work shall be done under the inspection of. and
to the satisfaction of, the Town Engineer, the Town Building Official, or other
olficial from the Town of Vail, as affected by special districts or service districts,
as their respective interest may appear, and shall not be deemed complete until
approved and accepted as completed by the Town of Vail Community
Develoomenl Department and public Works Department.
2. To secure and guarantee performance of its obligations as set forth herein, the
Developer agrees to provide security and collateral as follows:
\
Account Number: 01 -0000-22026
Page 1 of 3
0 Jo t a6ed
'6/€46
pelBpdn
gTIFf :sardxe uorsslurrloo Iy\
'leas letclJo pue pueq Iu sseuirl4
-(-\
sr qr aur arolaq pa*^offi fi -kff :j*ffi,o,'3,f; o -^l,p
Jfr|ryx;:lff:
3$ yp :se:1dxe uo1sslr.u uoc Iy1
'Fes lErcrllo pue pueq ,{u sseu11L1
^q-l.+sr:T€l@- p Aep-@
slql au e:oleq pa6pelnnoulcq se,St'ueuear6y lueuenotdnrt tadoiSndt 6u;o6Y.ro1 .,.1f fl*
Stevf lo /LLNnoc
OCVHOIOC IO 3IVIS
'ss
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
ss.
/."tff ,"'ffit€ff o"' *tntm ent ng riileryFfff owreds ed b ero rE m e th is
Wtness my hand and officialseal.
My commission expires: c l,.tlqB
STATE OF COLORADO )
couNTy oF EAGLE ,o i.tt'
ue.#:"Hffifl"l'Hff
\Mtness my hand and officialseat.
My commission expires: e/r.{ {qB
rfdc.d 92U9a
I
P LAN N E H, co II,IU uN IryE eETfr Eiw-
Page 3 of 3
fi"*n"n, "l8ffilii D"u"rop".,enr I
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Name:Receipt No.
oare-JZLEL-t7-
Please make checks payable to the TOWN OF VAIL
ffiAccount No.Item Tolal
001 0000 3141110
oor oooo g1-+-1 1 12
00100003141i12
00100003141112
4onIC alg nqq999"_[/gp!
Uniform Building Code
Uniform Plumbing Code
Unilorm Mechanical Code
zA
L/u
CB
CB
$5.00
$s4.00
$39.00
$37.00
;
;
;
001 0000 3141112 Unilorm Fire Code .00
001 0000 3141112 National Electrical Code CB $37.00
001 0000 3141112 Other Code Books L, tl
001 0000 314'121'l Blue Prints/Mylar Copy Fees BF $7.00
001 0000 314 '11 1 1 Xerox Cooies XC $0.2s
001 0000 314 11 1 1 Studies, Masler Plans, elc.MS
001 0000 315 3000 Penalty Fees/Re-lnspections PN
001 0000 311 2300 Plan Review Re-check Fee (940/per hour)PF
001 0000 315 2000 Olf Hours Inspection Fees OH
00100003123000 Conlraclors License Fees CL
001 00003124000 Slgn Application Fee SP $20.00
001 00003124000 Additional Sign Application Fee SP
001 0000 3112200 Q99qg1 [eylew Board Fee (Pre-paid)DR
001 0000 315 3000 _By 1!!b S I Jtye!!1g atpq Fee PN
001 0000 240 3300 Qgy_gLqpet lmpeyemenl Agreement Deposit D2)lo tft)lqo.M
001 0000 31 2 1000 |CS!C!I e!'!_l-.89!9e lgq (I9 r )HT
001 0000 2302000 !geq, {_s9e-s r;!e s!4u rant Fe e to C o. Dep t. Rev.SA
'001 0000 201 1000 Ielq! lp @_1, !:/e ( st al q_:fe1pqy q !!e TP
'001 0000 310 1100 Ia&Flg @142.J9u,!) - qe!e!!Sates rax T7
Other/Misc.MS
001 0000 311 2500 PEC APPLICATION FEES
001 0000311 2500 Additional GRFA - "250"PV $200.00
00100003112500 Conditional Use Permit PV $200.00
001 0000 311 2500 Exterior Alteration - Less than 100 so. ft.PV $200.00
001 0000 311 2500 Exlerior Alteration - More lhan 100 so. ft.PV $500.00
001 0000 311 2500 Special Developmenl Districl - NEW PV $1,500.00
001 0000 311 2500 Special Development District - Maior Amend PV $1,000.00
001 0000 311 2500 Special Developmenl District - Minor Amend PV $200.00
001 0000 311 2500 Subdivision Fees PV
001 0000 311 2500 Variance PV $250.00
001 0000 31 t 2500 Zoning Code Amendments PV $250.00
Re-Zoning PV $200.00
Other MS
TOTAL:
Commenls:
Cash _ Money Order #Check #Received by:
J_.,- -
ffiilfiU#Hlg'-.$iff #fidg( fts.lc
ifoilt trnaerro llru'm
PAY T0 nc ffi: s Flnslssl( tr lflIL
:lcl0l5l9:
FM EHFII IIAY
Tm{ tr uetl 5n e:337
Tmr of Uail}r* qFfffiR f,ECEPf r*r
ffiti ffi)BI*" ffiili' l*,,'
off#lolH" T,'ffi$ &
SIEIfrT II1U
CftFSUIEI' E/F DIR
MIEz l2t?4t91 16r?l:03
T0Tfl. O'Eg(
HilIT lEffiiE}
f1ffi.0ilm.n
llfll{ Yilt FoR YUn 9nYE{T!
DATE
RECEIYED FROM
ltGt!?T- ltc Tcrrf Yd
, l9*-N? d8601
ADDRESS
Pcrmit Numbers
HOW PAID- Cash-Oreck' j.i'fi f'
Folice Receipt lhmbers
;PiFlvn'rr-:j, ,I:"r; s, -'v .=- -
t. l'.tr'
\Project Application
,^" Wr{ /,1 t lrlfl}
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Archilect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot I , Btocr
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Su mmary:
X,r" Approval
?T
a
FRONT Iry2-8s4-74t4 MRY 23'97 9 :50 No .014 P .05
Quctlond Call|8lunrnu,y::".r:otr..'
. ..
ApPr.rcATloN FoRDpsIcN REVIE* ArpnovAL '
.
,a
.P}TYSrcAL ADDRESSI
PARCEL#I (Contrci Baglc Co, Arscmon Ofllos at 9?0'328't510 lbr darcal O
zot!hto:
TOVINOF
cgNERA,l NFORyATIaN ,-,-_-
,Tht6 nppttafitlgl ln tor eny piqioot rcqulring.Dcstgr Rovio*'rpproval, ArypoJoct roqulrlng dorl3n rwlort lturlt ' i'
-
roc,cive Dortsn noviov rnpilrf nidlito silUnritti,Ufor n uuliilng pcrurlt. Foicpeotflo Informadsn, ioo tlrc uubrnlttd
ffiilffi;;o||d.-f#ffidtil;d rh;ail *q"-*tcd. Tho rppiiortion oonnot bo trcosrrtod untll rlt t|to rcqukud
i,il;;riffiil;iooiiiioc rm piifit nr.y rlso ncod ro bc rovicwc{ by thc Town couircll andor the Plrnnlng and
i:iuiroontont f Conrnrlssion. Iiorig,r nc*iow Board rpprovtl crplrcr ono yclr rltcr finrl epprOvrl unlcll o
Duttcltng Duntt t lrruod u6 corrnuctlon k drrtorl'
c..
D,
D,NAI{B OF OWNBR(S):
!{AlLTNO
'f E,owNER(8) sl,cNaTuRD(s):
F. NAMBOP
MAILINO
TYPBOF REVIEWAND FBg
tr Ncw ContFuction - St00
6.Addl(on - 150
flMinor Altorrtlon. $20
o,
wdllr Co.
El Concoptort Bovlow - $0 Por ariy rpplicrflon whcto tho ppllornt wirhor to mcct wlth De*ig-r.Rovlow
Boanl'to iitcnulnc whothc or not uro proloct goncrally oottlnllpr wlth tho
dcsign Srldolincc, Tlrc DRB dg€l not vofa ott concoprurl rc*lowr'. :
DRB iecr oro to bc pel6 rt rhe rime of cubmlmt. Latc, wticn applytlgfor a hrlldtnt pomdt, plsago lPtlify
thc rccurrtc valrnrlin of 6o proJccl Tlrc Town ofVatl wlll rrllust tho foe aocordin3 to tbe ptoJccl vduatl$.
.
FI.EABE 3UBMIT THIS APPLICATION ALL SUEMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE .
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEI{T. 75 EOUTH TNONTAGE ROADT
Conutnlotlon of I now bulldlng'
Includer any qdditlcr whErc rqunrc lbotrgc ie tddcd to rny raldandrl or' '
corrunorctrl bslldiog.
Inolrrdor mlnor ohnilgcr to btritdingr endrito inqrrcvcndnta esch er. '.
," "
^ rorooJlnt. palnthS, villdow ldditioru, lrndroaplng, forcoar md rctahlnS
r'.: | :
vAtr,col,onADo $63?.
o UrtBVtzvt)
TEtdhl EF lJtrl I1-
Hiscel lanesus Cash
B5-:9-ti Et?r44: ll
R€rEiF,t S ??5414
Hrcc,unt# CF;+1344
LEE HIf'1EL\,fteF FEE
Hrri*un t l.errdered } ?8. BB
I?em paid Bnounr paid
sl.BFBE4llf,lElFEl tr1, BEI
f,h.]rrB* rBt Urne'J ." u, lilrt
THFIFI}< \/SU
'frur csshier EEFTHFT
o /fu,
<6 2_
T PP'a
7gL -rr€4 /"?Lio4rt'ar/
0w17(d Ra!*fi- (t/ c col,an'-- 9r'6.r=--n r,
Ce^sva?v "s ''
$e-ForZ{ D;=Crr sS E. A ?wLa<6iarG G,ae F C-
?Y?auoiuL Fzco.< Prz# Z' 1 ,['
A
-//a-
fuou-u (t- ,-e ;- g-t)
-
[tur/s1vi*(*
Tg€ 64cze6-- o'w Tla- ,?;cer Sr'p5s- ,'&
.Ya^ e4<€ -- " Yo,-< SPia Ok, €/vau6!
, FAfr* ,4s-arrstr-vt/ C4agCg ,4A/O Fll?t
Oeeporn:s\4/-T-T C/r</V r4.reo&nuz ,*rzs>a , PCSP?L
,RZ ?<vei F:.7 o Oy? A'{ aOuCg rfl1ue- {otaSS./
i-Ta 5a1qr/ ht*T (-" T4- .o: ) Z ' +o
, y''. oL,,44T- -ns fl'ftJDlT- ?E >a .
O* Lu€ CouL O k -<)
< Q,GI-
IJOIST- )U 7/S--FzrIL ,*sx ov>>c zr+F
(tzacs i^/ PcPcs- 6F -<usr J o i sr
lrV.O CZatr- ,4M y'tr<- STJrzz6g: 4r?a&
,,4<SSS --=---12 79-s /atCC O@\/'w STpr"ct .
/Ulr.- -To gd o^d- dyL 7dE-
tr4gre -tv -f,ucasr8 r
//tZ2 S<Vrz&tF- 7479t4 -
Oll -.YOCtrz A a(c;/
(atrce.y
t-ZdVDrd
0u= cg/v #(rz
4zlzorz - -
TEIJ}.{ BF I.'F I L
l'lisce I I aneous Cash
Ee,:eir,t * 3?f,i1'+
Hc,::c,r-rt-, t. + l:f'l + lf 1 6
ler r; r lEr-".uLLr'lFltl-5u80 I r'r I 5 I fi t'{
;;;;".,; iei-,'Jere'l :r lEE1'tlEl
Itenr Paid Hmount Paid
84-3?-?r
f]l. EtBfi[1+ 1.338688
tlhange r* t l-r t-rie'l
I 4: -lB: li
I.EiE. Bfi
L1 . tlt:l
THta]-ll4 'fBlJ
\fr,ur,:gslri*r FiEFITHFI
B4/2t/L997 L4i44 7763339311
ttev!.it6'
';_e]...
I.JLTIMA HOLDII.IGS LLC a2
qto
wTtrrlr:"r*q-ne
he
DaLe E6cci veci by E l.re Comnrririt,y
Dovalop$cnC DepartmgnE :
IPPIICATIOIT 80nsliucl.l Felcl.f ssEDrvrsrof,cSlrtEB 17.25 vari. r@NrcIpA.L coDE
crossvl,cw a! vril, Ltd.
(p:JEtSE pRf t OR typE)by Cinnamon V.ature6, Inc, r Gaa.r.l '.prrtnerA. ApFLICN{I Robert 011nan, ptesldent
&tAIr,rNG ADDRESS__glg_gl-tlna leld1n91, &!d. 22ss cgrlIb€rl_rnd Paskrr.y
Blag 700, st. c Atlanta, cA 50339 PHoNE 270-i.Ll:29.99,
B. FROIERTX. O
OITIIER' S SIGTIAA
ltAIIlINc IDDBI,SS_ igne__qE 4BBlicant
LOCATION OF PROPOSAI,:
vall, cO 81657roravl.Y at Vg
L0 r_LBLoc{__srrBD rvr s r oN::Bj_F r ! rNG_
T.DPIICAIION FES SlC0. 00
MA,TERTALS !O 8E SU8}|I!!ED:
P}ID crlEcx t
1. 8wo aylar copics rnd onc p.p.E copy, of !,hq subcilvlslon platshall be subrsicted Co !.he D€paltsrenc o! Comrnunity D.vclopnenE.The plat sha!] include ehc fol.Ioriogl
a. lhc lj,nai pl,as shall !c drarrn by a !€glstered surv.yor inrnqia ink. o8 osher subssanriar- solut!,on, on a repr6duciblctngqlum (pr.f.srbly ,nyla!) wlth dlmcnsion of, Ewcncy-16e; 5yclrLrt,y-sir inchcs and shall be ag a scale cf one hundredf€ct to one loch ,or :arger r'!th tnlrgins of one and one-halfto tco inches on rhe icft and one-tralf inch gn.alL orbcrstrdes,
b. Acqulat€ di$ensions t'o th€ De6r65t, oDe-hund!€dth o! a fooEfor rll linEs, arrgles and curvog uged Lo d€scrlbcboundrries, streets, se!.backs, alleys, easgmenEa,sirucEures, ereas !,G be rcsclved or-dedlcaEed for publlg or
c,oruaoD uges and other iriporteng feacures. AII curves shallbe clrculer arc6 and shElt 116 dcflnsd by rbe raCiuol ceDtral
.an9le,.are scored distanccs and bearingi AIt climenllons,borb ll,near and rngut.r, rae co be dec6rnjned by an acculale'conErol sqrwey {n E,he field qhich nuDr batancc ind close.rriihln a liml,c of one 1n c6n chousand.
c. Noltb ar:ox and g=aphic scale.
o. A systenacj.c ideritific:tion of eII exicttng and propoeedbulldings, unigs, Io!s/ blscks, and nanes ior ati slreers.
e. An identijicatioo of rhe strc.!s, alleys, par)rs, .nd orharpubllc .Eeas or facj,liE:es a! shorrn on c,he pIaC, and ededicaclon Eheraof so che pu'oric use. .\n tiant.lflcation ofthe essenents as shotrn on c,he plaE and 3 glanE rhcEao! E,or.hc pltbl I r': rrse. ar*es s.sarrrad jo: gtr:r::i psbIlCacquioltlon shall also be shcwn on thn pltt,
t, A 1rrl.!t.en sulvcy descripclon of Lh€ area includ.ing .rhe lotal.acreage to lhc nealesr approprt.,ld slgnificanc f,igure. Theacrcags of each lot, or pircel strall be shown in thls rnannsras HeII .
A, descriptlon of aII survBy tilonunents/ boqh lound and s€t',rrbich nask the boundaries bf, rhc subdivislon, and adescEipElon of, all mcnuient.r uscd ir condtcting the rurvcy.Monument peEi:lrE.r per Colorado strtutcs. f'/o-pelirlctcr -
noiru cns! shall bc escab.Lishsd a9 najor con!,rol rnonumenqs,th€ naterials shlch shall be de:,ernined by Lhe tounenglneer.
PAGE
Y.
a4/2L11997 t4i44 7783339311ttevlii6':iil ,1-''U
I.JLTIMA HT]LDII.IGS LLC PAGE a2
ooq" 366g1veci f'.cfe Coruarrniiy
Dovclopnenc DdJr:menE r_
(PIEESE PRTN?A, APALICA}'IT
I'PLTCIETON rotsrucl.l FextlrY ssEDrvrsrof,
CSASSEI 17.25 I/AIL I'FNTCIPAII CODE
Crossvie$, at vail' Ltd '
OR tyfElby Cinnamon ventures, Inc, ' Genelal t.rtner
ADDR5SS sane as Applicant
I'!Af!ING ADDRES S c/o Ultitna lloldinqs, ltA. 225s cunDerlrnd P.rkw.y
Bras ?00, st6 c Atlanter 9A 50339 pfi0NE*!.11:-&9-
B. FROPERTY O !A
OIN|ER'S SIGTAfSITE ao*e]&:-l3i4otD
LOCATI ON OF PROPOSA!;
STRAET NDDRE5S
lor-9_BtocK_srrBDrvr srcN..re:Z-.F r LING_
A.PPLICATION FES SICO. OO E'iLU cr{EcI( t
M TERIAI.S T'O BE SUB}.II! TED:
1. Two myla! copies ard olrc Fap.E copy, of cb€ €ubcilvlsion plat
shalf be subraitted co Lhe Dcpartrnenc of cornnunity Dcve.IopnenE,.
The plat shall include che tol.Ic?ring:
a. lhc finai pi,ar shall bc drawr by a r€gistered surv.yo! inIadla ink, os ocher subslanLial solutlon, on a rcploduciblc
tncdl,um (pr.{.rably nylar) r^'ith dj.monsion of Ewency-fsua 5yrhi{gy-six inches aDd shetrl be at a scale cf ono hundredfe€t to one iDch or Larger $i.ch haEgins ot one end one-halfco Eqro :.nches on rhe l3ft and one-half ineh on'all oEbeE
sides .
b. Accurale d,irtlensions to chg Degrest one-hunctredEh of a fooEfor all rines, anglcs and curues used Lo d€scribeboundaries, streets, s€rbackg, alleys, easemcnEa,
struccures., areas !o be reserved or dedicaEed for publlg or
conrroD uges and other inrportang features. AI), curves shallbe clrcular arcs end shau, be defined by EIe raCiuEr ceDlralangle, are sco.ed distanccs and beariirgr. AII dinensions,both liaear anq angul3r, rre ra be decersrlned b), an accurate.cont(ol sulwey in rhe field '{hj,ch rtlusi ba}ance and closeuiehin a liniu of ane .1$ len !:rousand.
C. liorth 8r:o'.r and g.aphis sca]e.
o. .tr systendcic iderrtificarion of eII existlng and pEoposedbulldings, unics, lo!s, b.locks, and nanes for all streeEs.
c. An ideqtj.€icatior of rhe streeus, alleys, parks, and otharpublic areas or faclliE:es as shoun on che plat, and ededlcatlon Bheriof 30 uhE public use. ln idantlficarion ofthe eajenents as sho',n on i.he plac ard s glanc rhelao! Eo
r.he plrbl i. rrse. lfaag r?sesrred Sa: !'l:r:=e p.;!I:c
acqui6iEion shall also be shcwn on the pIaE,.
f. A r.|!i!t.en surwel' descripclon or- Bhe area including the total'
acEeage to the ncalesc appropriate significant tigure. The
acreage of ecch 10! os prroel shelL be shor,rF ln rhis nanne!
as s€II.
g. A description of all survey rnonuroeoi€, both tcund and sel,which nask the boundaries of Lhe subdivislon, and aclesclipcign of aII ncou-nenls useci i:r condircring thc survey.
Monrlnenc perinrr!.r per Colorado staEuies. fuo pelimeec!
nonu;(encs shall be established as najor cooErol rRonunentg,the r€t,erials sirich shall be de:ernineci by Lhe touD
engineer -
1450 '8" Buffehr Creek Roail
ios svTrv at ValI
hu*"W
TOV.CO[/|M, DEV. DEPT
coloRArx) ILPINDS, INC.
P.O.BOX2708
ill246 Highway6 &24
Avoal €oloado 81620
303-949-6461
15March 1995
To: Town ofVail Desbn Review Bood
Frm: Mrty Joncs
eftechsvinginrycctcd he eite ord dcvclopncntplan for Oossview at Vailbeing devdopcA by Stcvc
Csrsler, it is my opinion tbat the lodgEpolc phc h question by unit C would harre at bcst a possible 100z6
chsrcc rurrriral of fre constuotion proccss. The davclo'pcr has agecd to transplant oftcr salvage$lc hrle
aspen wtrioh would be dcstoyed by tre developanent process. lt is therefore my opinion llut it would not
be wortrc&ile to attcmpt to relocatc this portioular teei espeoialy considedng the density ofttc
ruromdingforest
Sinccrely,
MJ/on
MrtyJoncs _^--%fu
/
s/rc/es Cret'{
- '1a1o.Je
- ' 5 .'c-'
't "l 't4 4+pa-t t''t n
/-; n',t- o? -Drt,rwe-bdTLe'
r'-r :l rr r. jffi
F !L T COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
March 6, 1995
George Fluther
Town Planner
Ard
Depanment of Communiry Development
Randy Hodges
P.O. Box 1297 !
Dillon, CO 80435
Dear Randy:
Thank you for appearing before the Design Review Board (DRB) on Wednesday, March 1'
1995 with conceptual siie plan for the proposed Crossview Development. The purpose of this
letter is to summarize the DRB'g response to the proposed conceptual site plan.
The DRB indicated the 20'coniferous tree in question must remain. The Board further
indicated that the elevation ol building "C" should be revised, building "D" should remain in the
location proposed and building "E" should be slid back to the Easl, closer to the fire truck
turnaround.
At this time, my understanding is that you wish to appear before the DRB on Wednesday'
March 't5, 1995. lf this is in fact true, I will need to see a revised site plan by no later than
noon, Monday, March 13, 1995. lf you cannot meet the deadline proposed, please contact
me ai your eirliest convenience and we may make different arrangements. I can be reached
at 479-2138 during normal office hours.
Sincerely,
fJ*TX,*t-,^.'t
E COPY
I
F II.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 8/,657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX s03-479-2452
January 5, 1995
Mr. Randy Hodges
JR Architects, Inc.
P.O. Box 1297
Dillon. CO 80435
Deparunent of Community Dev !,rptnent
52"t';r
fut-.t--,-, -*y- -/zl-sl.-r'-*-J
6*,.a-t* f /00 ,tL, frooo
Dear Randy:
Below is a summary ol the issues raised at the Design Review Board (DRB) meeting held on
Wednesday, January 4, 1995. The issues raised by the DRB members should be addressed
by yourself or Steve Gensler at the time of linal review.
Desion Review Board Commenls/lssues
1. The architecture of the buildings is very well done. The changes that have
been made to the architecture are in accordance wiih the previous desires of
the DRB.
2. To create a more community feel to the project, the same exteriot'stone
treatment and the same gray color tones should be used throughout the entire
project.
3. Please submit for DRB review architectural detail sketches (i.e. fascia, railing,
stonework, etc.).
4. Please review your proposed landscape plan and provide greater attention to
your landscaping along Lions Ridge Loop. Attempts should be made to screen
the view from Lions Ridge Loop down to the rooltops of the units within the
project.
The site plan proposed for the project and previously approved by the Planning
and Environmental Commission (PEC) needs to be adjusted slightly. The
purpose of adjusling the site plan is to save more ol the large coniferous lrees
on the property. Namely, special attention should be given to the Zo-inch
diameter fir located to the west of Building C. One alternative which may save
this tree in its current localion is to adjust the building envelope on Unit F to the
north and west and to relocate the driveway entrance lo Unit C from the north
to the south side of the building. At the time of final review before the DRts' it
would be in your best interest to identify lo the DRB those trees which can be
saved lrecause ol changes to the sile plan and those lrees rvhich cannot be
saved because of develoomenl.
Mr. Hodges
January 5, 1995
Page Two
7' Every attempt should be made to save.the trees currenfly existing on the site.prease submit a detaired tree preseruation pran roitne froj"ct. At a minimum,the tree preservation pran shourd incrude tr!" pr"."rltion pran map, rimits ofconstruction disturbance for each orljtoinq site, tree proiection fencing, rootpru n ing bef ore excavation, co nstruction s-torag e ind";6;g, wirt-proofprotection, etc.
For your reference, I have enclosed a copy of tree protection and tree value informationalliterature. The information may be of herp'to you as you go about preparing a treepreservation plan.
I hope the comments and issues addressed in this letter will be helpful in providing you withthe necessary information needed to finalize your prolect for DRB review. shourd you haveany questions or concerns regarding the comments and issues aooresseo in this letter, asalways, please feer free to contact iyserf or anoy xnuotsen ;;drs;;;r office hours.
Sincerely,
fr-.'^-*"-'/'^*t'- t
George Ruther
Town Planner
TO: MIKE McGEE
,ff*On u J 1YY5
TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to George Ruther
Town Planncr
vtl u\4-t b.u-JI
Datc:
Dislributcd to lhc Firc Dcparlmcnl, public Works, and Landscaping on
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL R EVTEW
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMTTTED.:DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:efl86. ,-'?:4 a-.;.r.- rA- qh./;^1 / /.d,"*?_,-pbn.
Engincering:t
Reviewcd by: -Terri Mo.rrcru Dale: forl.rocrl ro. rnq:.
commcnls: l Dr-1" ?lo^ pn"u,L) tvler lo.L ,n.[" accounl oflr:L
flon, f,r,.^ lt'* r)t+. cr,,..l-*{11 -l.L* ;, d- az,, pc.tr< ,,1r.[1[s Copt-> un )ar*,-{,, L,o^t lrtn L-.,2 . p{6.)."l.r Su-a.Lt_ 6,;L( hzLL +. N_ 'a,zz, J [. Jk /oo,€\'u 1,"-, JIa- fu- +l-t )^.'fS**)^ /*7) }qet- 4 dr-;,*-y i* - le L-, ,;22) . A
Landscapins : trot on ,-r'/L, g in<-
" I gu- ,::;"*r_";-I*
Reviewcd by: ----- Date: --- * .p.2./ L : ru-e L J -
Po^ J *1 or tu-t ^u f,,^rtr cu. l'.ul* t"',r^L
Firc Dopt.:
Reviewcd by:
Commcnls:
Commcnls:4) D[r,t{,>..
Oa h^g,^r
December 12,1994
Mr. George Ruther, Town Planner
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Crossview
Design Review Board Comments
Dear Mr. Ruther:
We are pleased to resubmit crossview for Design Review Board approval and
appreciate the board comments from the fuly 20, 1994. We have made substantial
changes to the exterior of the buildings and feel that the DRB comments have
assisted us in designing a much nicer project than originally submitted.
A summary of the changes are as follows:
A. Building G has been totally redesigned and is substantially smaller. As a
result of this building being smaller we have been able to add bay
windows to several of the other buildings.
B, More architectural detail in the form of trim, brackets, roof overhangs,
etc. have been added.
C. More variety of materials has been incorporated as well as more variety in
windows and details at garage doors.
Specific to the July 22, 1994 comments, please note the following.
I. DRB COMMENTS/ISSUES
From the buiWing elevations proposed. it appears that all of the buildings are
the same and hck panache. The units mal<c no real statement in terms of
architecture or future markertng ability. Therefore, please consiiler adding a
somewhat more elegant laok which may be accomplished through the use of
mo r e ar chite ctur al det ail.
The exterior of each building has been redesigned with significant
changes which make each building different. Bay windows have been
added to each building except building E. More elegance has been
provided by the use of more trim details, greater variety of siding and
stucco and significant changes to the shape and size of windows. While we
do not believe that the future marketing ability of the project should be a
]-:a-1-I-l,-
.>;rf Ira
=Ea?>OF-
box 1297
drllon, colorado
80435
-
303.468.5871
3.
Design Review Board consideration, it should be noted that revised plans
have been entremely well received by the real estate community and the
project's realtor, Lee Rimal, has letters of commitment for the purchase of
three of the units.
DRB COMMEMTSISSUES
The horizontal siding on each of the units is too predominant. To correct this,
use more of a variety of materials and add more architectural detail to the
elevations.
To eliminate the predominance of horizontal wood siding buildings B
and E have been changed to vertical wood siding and on building F wood
siding has been totally eliminated and changed to stucco.
DRB COMMEMTSIISSUES
The continuity between the units that has been proposed may be occeptablt
provided it does not create a monopoly house look Please attempt to create
more of a community feel amongst these units through the creative use of
stone or other erterior building materials to connert and blend each of the
units together.
The monopoly house look has been eliminated by designing each building
to be distinctly different. However, continuity is still maintained with the
same roofing and roof slope, similar fascia details and the use of masonry
on each building.
DRB COMMEMTSfiSSUES
Maintain the high architeaural quality that currentf exists in the
neighborhood. This can be accomplished by simpf refining your proposed
architecture dtshtly and adding some simple cosmetic features to each of
the units,
As noted earlier significant changes have been made which result in the
project being comparable to the high architectural quality of the
neighborhood. The project has been refined significantly in the use of
materials, windows and trim. Cosmetic changes have been made as well as
significant architectural revisions such as adding bay windows.
bx 1297
drllon, colorado
80435q 303.468.5871
5.DRB COMMENTS/ISSUES
Several of the building elevations as proposed illustrate somewhat hrge
interrupud blank wall spaces. To eliminate this rather dull ebvation, please
consider adding some detcil to help interrupt the blank walll
In locations where there were large blank walls, the buildings have been
redesigned to place windows in those areas or other details have been
added such as the stucco trim details at building C and F. Roofoverhang
and architectural details have been added to buildings A, B, and D, and
louvered grills added to building E.
DRB COMMENTS/ISSUES
Please bing building material samples to the meeting at the time of ftnal
review.
A sample board is being prepared and will be presented at the meeting.
Additionally, colored elevations will also be presented.
DRB COMMENT|ISSUES
Greater proof is required of those trees which you have indicated will be
praerved through the construction process. Please submit documentation
which veriftes your ability to preserve the trees which you have indicated can
be preserved.
As was discussed at the |uly 20, 1994 meeting, we are concerned about
preserving existing trees and have tried to design the buildings in a way
which allows the minimum excavation near trees to be preserved. On
buildings B & Q the back of the units was changed to crawl spaces so that
the excavation would be approximately 4'0" deep., The existing trees are
15'0" away from building B and l0'0" away from building C. On the east
side of building D the excavation is approximately 6'0" deep and the trees
are l5'0'away and on the west side the excavation is approximately 1'0"
deep and the trees l0'0" away. Additionally during construction all trees
to be preserved will be protected by snow fence during construction.
DRA COMMENTS/ISSUES
A shake roof or a roofing materiel that imitates a shake roof should be
considered for thk prolect.
Instead of the green fiberglass roofing shingles proposed at the fuly
20, 1994 meeting, a heavy textured "weathered wood" fiberglass
roofing shingle will be used. This shingle is similar in appearance to a
shake roof.
8.
box 1297
drllon, colorado
8043sq 303.468.5871
We have made every effort to address allof the concerns of the Design Review
Board. If we have accidentally omitted anything, please let us know .rs soon as
possible so that we can make any required revisions prior to the meeting.
le of changes have been made to the DRB application. On
pageT the materials and colors have been revised and on page 10 the allowed
GRFA has been revised to reflect the GRFA allowed by Ordinance 17, Series of
1993 and the proposed GRFA has been revised to reflect the changes mentioned
earlier.
box 1297
drllon, colorado
80435
SincerelS
Please note that a
-
3O3.468.s871
-t
:,
I
14,
rl'i ,. 1"-
I.l
t,
2.
i
!
I
I
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTTGATION
LIONS RIDGE SUBDIVISION, FILING NO.
TOt.lN OF VAIL, COI.ORADO
' Prepared for:
Mr. Steve Gensler
Crossview Properties Ltd.
5299 YIC Boulevard, Suite 500
Englewood, C0 80111
r 2334 WEST AT.AMGDA PAnKWAY. IAKEWOOO. CO soz2s 13,3t989.r 2?3
Job No. 93-60 June 21, 1993
1 ..
' i
I TABLE OF COI{TENTS
I
I
|'
I
I
I
I
2l
3
3
4
4
5
6
8
10
10
.11
.11.
Fig. I
Ftg. 2
Fig. 3
Figs. 4 and 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
.:r
i,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCOPE
This reporE presents the results of a soils and foundation investi-
gation for two proposed residences to. be located in Crossview At Vai1,
Tracts A-l and A-2 of Lions Ridge Subdivision, Filing No. 2 in the Town
of Vai1, Colorado. A description of subsurface .conditions .found in
exploratory borings, .recommendations for foundation const,ruction,
criteria for design of foundations, and our recomruendations for beLow
gradg construction. are.presente{ in t,his repor!. The report was pfe-
pared based on conditions found in the exploratory borings, results of
laboratory tests, and our experience r+''ith sinilar subsurface conditions
in the Vail area. The. recommended foundation construction procedure is
influenced by the proposed type of structures and anticipated foundation
loads. Prior to construction we should review the construction plans
for the st.ructures Eo confirm that our recornmendations are satisfacEory
for the residences as designed. A summary of our conclusions and recom-
nendaticins is presented in the following'paragraphs.
STJM},IARY
1.
CONCLUSIONS
Subsurface conditions found in the bori.ngs consisEed'of 2 to 3
feet of topsoil underl-ain by sands and clays to depths of 7 to
17 feet underlaj.n by sandstone bedrock vhich extended to the
maxinum depth explored of 40 feet.
No free ground wat,er was found in the borings at the time ofdrilLing. However, ground water is always possible in locaL-
ized zones at shallower depths especially at the surface of t.he
bedrock.
OF
2
4.
-2-
The residences may be constructed vith a spread footing founda-
tion system.
Below grade const.ruction at this site requires special Precau-
tions as outlined in this report in order to maintain the
stability of the slope and sides of excavation. In addition'
the potential for encroachment on adjacent proPerty during con-
struttion needs to be considered. Actual slope conditions wil-1
not be known until- the excavations are opened. A representa-
ti.ve of our office mus! be on-site to observe the opening of
the . excavations .
cut and
with 1ow
times to
5.
6.
7.
Retaining wa11s rnay be designed and constructed for
fill- areas as well as foundation wal-1s.
Slab-on-grade construction is possible on this site
risk of slab moveraent.
Good surface drainage should be maintained at all
reduce the risk of foundation soils becoming wetted.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
At the time of this investiSation plans for the residences were
preliminary in nature. We understand the residences will be 3 stories
including the basenent and the garage which wil-l be at the Lover level.
The structures are anticipated to be of wood frame construction above
.- r . -:.
grade and cast-in-place concrete construction below grade. Below grade
construction is planned for the basement areas. The naximum vertical
depth of excavation is planned to be as much as 26 feet belolr grade.
Foundat.ion walJ.s may retain up to 26 feet of soil on the uphi11 side if
the strucEures are not stepped to fit the slope. Rock retaining va1ls
are planned along the uphi11 side of t.he driveway and between the slruc-
tures. These va11s may be up to 8 feet in height.
,o
SITE CONDITIONS
The site slopes at about 2 to I (horizontat to vertical) downward
in a south-southeast direction. There are smaLl rectangular excavations
along the east side of the property. The access driveway wiLl cross
this area. An existing drai-nage channel crosses the area of the excava-
tions. as we1L. At the time of our investigation the .site was covered
w'i th grasses, . bushes and numerous trees which limited our access for
drilling. 0vera11 drainage of the site is in a south-southeast direc-
tion.
I}WESTIGATION
Subsurface conditions were expLored by drilling 2 borings at the
locations shown on Fig. 2. The borings were drilled on June 9, 1993
using a 4-inch diameter conti-nuous flight Pohter auger mounted on a
tracked rig. A field engineer was on the site to supervise the driI1-
ing, 1og the borings, visually classify the subsurface materials, and
obtaiirt samples for laboiatory testing. A description of the subsurface
materials observed in.the borings, penetration resisEance values, and a
summary of laboratory test. results are shown on the Logs of Exploratory
Borings, Fig. 3.
The laboratory investigation included visual classification of al1
samples and testing of selected samples for noisture content' density,
and gradation. Results of the laboratory tests are presented on Fig. 3'
Logs of Exploratory Borings and Gradation Test ResulEs, Figs. 4 and 5.
-3-
l;
I
I
I
I
I
-4-
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions consisted of 2 to 3 feet, of topsoil underlain
by clays and sands to depths of 7 to 17 feet. Sandstone bedrock was
then encountered which extended to the naxinum dept,h explored of 40
feet. No free ground water was found in the borings at the time of our
investigation. Hovever, ground vater is al-ways possibJ.e in localized
zones at shaLLower depths and especiaLly at the bedrock surface.
SITE GRADING
Cut and fill viLL be required for construction of the driveway,
basement, and garage areas. Some difficulty may be encountered when
excavating the harder sandstdne bedrock. We anticipate heavy backhoe
equipment wouLd be required and possibly blasting in the bedrock to
accomplish the excavation. The fiLL may be constructed from the on-site
soils excavaEed from the cuts. No gravel or cobble larger than 6 inches
or topsoil should be used in any fill area. Prior to placing fil1, the
area should be 6tripped of all vegetation and topsoil, scarified, and
compacted. The driveway will cross a drainage area and an excavated
area which periodically holds water. These areas will require extra
care to see that all soft wet soils are removed to expose firm soils
prior to placing any fill for the roadway. FiIl should be placed in
thin loose lifts and compacted to at Least 90 percent. of the modified
Proctor maximum dry density (AST}I D-1557) or 95 percent of the standard
I
I
-5-
Proctor maximum dry density (ASTl"t D-698). The placement and compaction
of fill should be observed and tested bv a reoresentative of our office.
FOIJNDATION
The subsurface soils at this site consisted of topsoil over sandy
clay and clayey sand soi.Ls underlain by bedrock. The topsoil is nol
suitabLe for support of foundations but' the remaining soils and bedrock
wil1 safely support spread footing foundation systems. Footings nust be
extended at Least 3 feet into natural soiLs in these areas. Foot,ings:- .--.-
support.ed by the undisturbed sandsEone may be designed for a much higher
maximum aLlowable bearing pressure. We recommend a spread foot,ing foun-
dation systen be designed and constructed in accordance with the fol-low-
ing criteria:
Footings shouLd be supported by undisturbed naturaL soil.s
beneath the topsoil and at least 3 feet belor*' originaL site
grades at alL points. Soils loosened by machine excavation
should be cl-eaned from the excavation prior to placing concretefor the footings.
:5Wal1 and column footings should be designed using a maximum
aLlorlable soil bearing_pressure ot-1.00=0 ptt Jgf.footings on
sand or clay soils. Footings supported by undisturbed sand-
stone bedrock may be designed for a maximum aLlowable bearing
pressure of .!$!gf .
Dimensions for column footings Should bi at least 24 by 24
j.nches and for continuous wa11 footings should be at least 16
inches wide. The footing widths may be greater depending on
the loads of the structure.
Continuous foundation val1s should be reinforced, top and
bottom, to span loca1 anomalies in the soi1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
l
I
I
I
I
t.
2.
4.
o
-6-
If pockets of soft soils are found in the bottom of the excava-
tions, the sofc soils should be excavated to expose firm soiIs.
The bottom of the foundations may be constructed on the firm
soils or the resulting excavation may be backfilled with com-
pacted soil or lean concrete. Any soils placed as backfill
should be placed in thin loose lifts, moisture conditioned and
compacted to at least 98 percent of the standard Proctor maxj.-
mum dry densicy (ASII"I D-698).
It may be desirable to place some footings on compacted fill to
reduce foundation wal-1 heights. Any area to receive fill
should be stripped of all topsoil. The area should then be
scarified, noisture treated and compacted. Fi1l should then be
placed in thin loose lifts, moisture conditioned and compactedto at least 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry
density (AST},1 D-698).
Exterior foot.ings of walLs should be proEected from detrimentalfrost action. The normal depth of frost protection in this
area is at least 4 feet beneath the ground.surface.
A representative of our offj.ce shouLd observe the bottom of the
completed excavations prior to constructing footings. All fill
pl-acement should be observed and tested during pJ-acement by a
representative of our office.
BELOW GRADE CONSTRUCTION
Excavations of up to 26 feet in the verticaL direction beneath the
existing grbund surface are planned for construction of the basement
areas. The buiLdings and most of the driveway wiLl be r.r'ithin the cut
area which covers the majority of the allowed building envelope. Slope
failures of open excavations can occur if the excavation for the base-
nent remains open for extended time without construction progressing to
brace the exiavati-on slopes or if the excavation slopes are not. properly
laid back. Great care needs to be exercised during construction so thaE
the slope remains stable -
5.
6.
7.
8.
l':;::-'.:.
'i-rr.
f ti't
:
I
I
I
o
We recommend if aE all possible thaE t.he depths of excavations be
minimized. The slope of the ground surface on this site is about 2 to I
(horizontal to vertical). This steep natural slope greatly influences
the size of an excavation. rn addition, the depth of the excavation and
the subsurface materials affect the distance the cut slope has to extend
up the mountain to daylight. Cut slopes of I to 1 or 1.5 to I must be
used in the soil,s and vertical cuts can be used in'the bedrock. Based
on the borings a greater depth of soil occurs on Trac! A-1 , therefore,
we anticipate a bigger excavation vouLd probabJ.y .occur on Tract A-1 .
The location and elevation of the buildings should be evaluated so thaE
constraint,s of the .excavation are known before construct,ion begins and
so that the excavation does not encroach onto adjacent property. Actual
slope conditions wilL not be knorvn unE,ir the excavations are opened. A
representative of our office must be on-site when the excavation
begins. The Location of the sandstone bedrock will determine the size
and back sl-oping of the open excavat.ion. During construction, ne recom-
- mend .that , a]-l of t,he folLowing precautions be taken to ieduce the risk
of slope failure:
1.
2.
Excavate only materiaLs necessary to construct. the r.raLLs.
Construct the wa1ls with methods and techniques that reduceconstruction time.
3. Excavations in the soils for garage or basement areas shouLd be
sl.oped at 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatEer to main-tain stability of the slopes. The soils classify as Type B in
accordance with 0SHA regulations. If water occurs in the cutslope at any poin!, the slopes shoul-d be excavated to 1.5 to 1
I ri1-!t*! '
;;..;.-.r '!l+i'. 'f ::-'
| *llt;:'
j ;:.
IIII
-8-
or flatter to satisfy OSHA criteri.a for Type c soils. verticalcuts may be made in the sandstone bedrock.
Excavation shouLd be performed after peak runoff periods whichis after approximately July 15.
If seepage of wat.er from the side of the excavation isobserved, it should be reported immediately t.o our office sothat r,/e can recommend methods for safely controlling the flovof water and maintaining stability of the slope.
We shoul-d review the proposed excavation plan prior tobeginning constructj.on.
REf,AINING AND FOUNDATION I{ALLS
Basement and retaining wa11s r,rill be constructed vhich will require
lateral design pressures. Lle understand the foundation wa11s may retain
up to 26 feet of a sloped backfir.l. The existing slope is 2 to I (hori-
zontal- to verticaL). Lateral earth pressures depend on the type of
backfi11, natural ground surface slope behind the wa1l, and the height
and type of wall. where walls are free to rotate sufficient!-y to
mobilize the srrengEh of the backfilJ., the warls should be designed to
' resist' the' ttactivert eirth pressure conditions. wtreie 'waLl.s are
restrained, vhich normalLy occurs in a basement wa11, Ehe warrs should
be designed to resist the earth pressure rat restrr condition. Based on
available inforndtion ve recommend for design an equivalent fLuid. weight
of 60 pcf be used for the I'active* earEh pressure and an equival.enc
fluid veigh. of 75 pcf be used for the "at restrr eart.h pressure in
soi1. A uniforrn lateral pressure of 150 psf nay be used for the portion
of va11s in bedrock. Lower lateral soil pressure values may be possible
4.
q
6.
I
I
iO
-9-
depending upon our review of final drawings. The equivalent fluid
weights include allowance for the sloping condiEions behind the warls
but do not include allowances for surcharge loads due to hydrostatic
pressures or. Live Loads. A passive equivalenE. fluid weight of 300 pcf
can be used to resist the wall loads where the soils wilL always remain
in place at the Loe of the wa1l. A coefficient of friction of 0.5 can
also be used at the bot.tom of the footing to resist the wal1 loads.
Backfill- behind or adjacent to walLs should be conpacted to at
1east 95 percenE of the standard Proctor.maxinum dry density (AsTl'.! D-
698). The backfill should be placed in thin roose l-ifrs ar or above rhe
optimum rnoisture content. Placement and compaction of the fill should
be observed and tested by a representative of our office.
To reduce the possibility of developing hydrostatic pressures
behind retaining wa11.s, ve recommend the provision of a !.ayer of clean
gravel or a nanufactured drainage system immediately adjacent to the
back of the walL. The gravel should have a maximurn size of 1.5 inches
dird'have a'naxinum of 3 percent passing the'No. 200 sieve. hlashed
concrete aggregate will be satisfactory for the drainage 1ayer. The
gravel drain fill or manufactured drainage systen shourd extend from the
bottom of the wal1 to within 2.feet of. subgrade elevat.ion.. The vater
can be drained from the gravel or manufactured drain by a perforated
pipe with collection of the water at Ehe bottom of the waLl Leading to a
positive gravity out1et.. Typical details for wal1 drains are presented
on Figs. 6 and 7.
-i0-
I FL00R SLABS
I
The near surface soils at proposed floor slab elevat.ions can con-
It-
I sist of Lopsoil, fi11, or natural soi1s. The natural soils will safely
I suPPort floor slabs. If topsoil or l-oose fill from excavation cuttings
II occurs at proposed fLoor slab elevations, it shouLd be overexcavated to
t expose the underl-ying natural soils and then backfilled with compacredIon-site soils. lrle recommend the soils be placed in thin loose 1ifts,
I
I moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 95 percent of the
r standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASfl D-698). We aLso recommerid aI| Linch layer of free draining gravel be pl-aced beneath the floor slabs
I to provide a moisture break between the clay soils and the concreteI
s1ab.
. CONCRETEI
I The soils ancl bedrock found at this area typically contain soluble
I sulfates. SuLfates can cause danage to concrete menbers constructed
li..r,rith ordinary cement that, cone into contact vrith the soil. Type V
II cemenE. is normaLly recommended for high sulfate areas. However, a suit-
r sbLe alternative for Type V cement is a I'modified" Type If cement. TheI
! "modified". Type II cement contains Less than 5 percent tricalcium .a1u-
!
rinate. use of a cement rich mixture (maximum of 0.5 water/cement
ratio) and 5 to 7 percent air entrainment further increases the sulfate
I
I resisEance. This cement should be used for all concrete mernbers (slabs,
I
l
I
-it-
piers' foundation waI1s, curb and gutter, and sidewaLks) that come in
contact with the soil or bedrock.
o
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The risk of wetting foundation soils and soils
tion waLls can be reduced by carefully planned and
drainage. hle recommend the folloving precautions
construction and maintained at all times after the
pleted:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
behind the founda-
maintained surface
be observed during
structures are con-
Wetting or drylng of the open foundation excavation should be
avoided as much as possible during construction.
A11 surface water shouLd be directed away from the top and thesides of the excavation during constructi.on.
The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residencesshould be sl-oped to drain away from the resi.dences in alldirections.
llater f1owing down the slope toward the structures. should bedrained around the buildings and away from the foundation wa11s
and.t.he cut s1.ope area uphill from the residences.
Backfill around the foundation wa11s should be moistened andcompacted to at least 95 percent of the standard proctor
naxinum dry density (AS1l,l D-6gg).
LIMITATIONS
our borings were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate deternina-
tion of foundation conditions beneath the sites. variations in subsur-
face conditions not indicated by the borings are ar'ays possible. we
should review the proposed excavation and structural plans and observe
1.
2.
4.
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l,
I
I
I
-L2-
the completed excavation to confirn that the soils are as indicated by
the borings. Placement and compaction of fill should be observed and
tested. The recomrnendations and design criteria presenE.ed in this
report are based on the structure as we have anticipated its desigo and
on the subsurface conditions as observed at this time, therefore, the
criteria presented in this report are not valid until we have been pro-
vided with final- construction plans and been aLlowed to evaluate the
slope conditi.ons.
rf ve ".n
lo" of further service i.n ai".u""ing the contents of this
report' or in anal.yses of the proposed structure from the soils and
foundation viewpoint, please call.
KOECHLEIN CONSIJLTING ENCINEERS
Reviewed Uy--1A
I{NH/gk
(1 copy.sent)
4cc: J.R. Hodges Architects,lcc: Andy Knut.sen - Town of Vail Community Development
o
v.lll
lJl.e
'. t-istru,
\*:
)t
NOT
JOA NO. e3-OO
VICINITY MAP
TO SGALE
Flo. 1
co(
0
c
I
.,
c2
o.
lll
=C-<ot!9I'::
=!=Fx|t{t
.- r
aar:
l:'-'j
!1.'j
at,o
=Goo
troF
Go
cxut
ILo
2IF
ao
\-'
oltlEolt
ao
2
|l
c
uF-3
l.
\
\
.;,\
a;:
:1
'lt
iJ
i.t.'
,!
tl
:rl
i:l
;:
I
o
cF
,ul
il
Ia
a!tao
lt
la
|lt
oao
ta
oIaoIoC
\
\
\
iatI
l*
rE
ot
aLrr r'r|erfr^ rrrtlr :6rr | '^\..70' t e.77q77cn5u 1
(t)
a
=Go
t0
GoF
GoJ
xI!
lro
ct)ooJ
!IEi!Qt-c?
,+
6 .F€ E'i tdr.16s iE $d\ !H
rott .8 - Rg f E E rr 4{ t r-'F-^!! r: Bx.e
.iar.,aad,: a I ggi
li i $$,Ef[
H3 i sf Esrs
s$ i ff u{f;{[" I o.t >."'
f,g [ !f; !ia*a dE e #p 3
uJF.o d N .rt
2
a"u'6gg
f.flI I. !ta Ef E i3 :d-6a
ifiPbbI E 6! i; E i :f 'oeA fi ?' :l :!; F r {r $li ; r ii s.q; u s qq
f;f;,b * e Eo.t ! qQ o-dr i i;; $;t!{ara!Ns I E i' i.;i EEsBsq I H ei €:g; A BI"i!; I i * ri HE'E E d H Ei EE
;;:"Q;;
o
$ ng EB Nl E -=- -r-
.t !t3l Nr HLd30
o6
ttttttlll
''lo- ,)-- 1--
;Ea$ ;EA$ sEE* $ ;
S
- -;39
$ lla* $
Ao
l<
t33l Nl l{Ld30
!r ll I fnSilnf lrl f-rtrllnv UOBJ U427 t71 l-;t 1- ' 1-1-.Jr.: n :.1 ?ezgBiitoai T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENG!NEERS
GRAVEL- ]-6-%
S|LT&CLAY 40 %
PLASTICTTY INDEX
GRAVEL 7 "A
SILT & CLAY 7] %
PLASIICIW INDEX
sANo ----44--%
UOUDLIM1T-%
SAND ?' %
UQUID LTMIT
-%
Somple of CLAY, sandv
From Borinq Ttl-2 at 4 feet
JOB NO. 93-6(r
r|Mt ftAoNGs U.S. SlAlloArlo StfilES CLtAn SOUAnt OP€NS{GStHnfsMN. 60 MlN. l9MN. !MrN. {MN. '2m 'rm '5O'!0'3O '16 '10'6 'a l/6' ]tA' l'4' 3' 5'6' 6'
:I
"f,r
':I
.00r .0f9 .037 .ora .rag .29, 500
o.a2
OAM€I€JI OT PANICTI N
a.r6 9.52 ,r9.1
]t:
il,.rll
-H--lo]l*
J-.1--.160
-H-l7o;t I
ltlto
fr:12, N
r52
crAY (Pr.ASr|c! rO S(r (NO.l+rrSrC)
IIMT RTADINGS
s9
dO
t0
.oof .(m .m5 .009 .Ol9 .037 .O7i! .t!9 .297 .seo l.l9 2.0 ?.36 d.76 9.52 t9.t 36.1 76.2 t21 2@
0..2 t52
cr Y (Pr,ASr|cl ro sr.r (NoN-ptA5r|cl
GRADAT ION TEST RESULTS
ru:'l*'.-'I :l:i.::.l:-i.ii:-',:j -
' .ii,-..I ,-1"
I -:::' ..
I il: j.-"
!r'
.1. .
t
KOECHLEIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sompleel C[,AY' sandy
From Bor
Somple of CT.AY. sandy
From
GRAVEL 8 7.
stLT&clAY 72 %
PIASTlcIWINDEX
GRAVEL ? %
srLT & CLAY 76 %
PLASTCIry INDEX
9qp9 20 96
UQUID LIMIT
-%
SANO 2? 7
LIOUID LIMff
-%
.m5 .oo9 .or9 .037 .oL . rac .zei Jco---.19-
140
I
50
do
70
80
90
rm1.76 9.52 tg.t t6.t 76.2 127
cr-Ay (pt^src) ro strr lNor.l.ft,{srcl
CLEAN SOUAT{
-il:
rx,;
-lfl.
+l-l'
fi-J-+Htoltlil;ll l,-
r77 2@
r52
201
':l
.00 .o74 .rdg .297 .590 t.r9 2.0 2.38 d.76
0.!2
DlAr!|€lEn OF PAnlCtt tN MTtUME|ERS
CLAY (Pr,{Sr|cl rO 9u (NoN.Pt .sl|cj
JOB NO.93-€O
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
F IG. 5
I
I
I
CLAYEY AACKFlLL
GRAVEL
(SEE REPORT FOR BACKFILL
REGOMMENDAT!ONS)
4 INCH DTAMETER
PERFOFATED P1PE.
N OTE S:
1. INSTALL EITHER:
2.
BELOW GRADE WALL
MANUFACTUBED DRAIN
PBOVIDE PLASTIC SHEET!NG GLUED
TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE
MOISTURE PENETRATION.
INCH TO NO.4 GRAVEL
slEvE.
12'MtN.
GFAVEL
COMPACTEO
BACKFILL
z
(o
MIN,.
A. APPROVED MANUFACTURED DRAIN SYSTEM AND GRAVEL COVERED PIPE ORB. GRAVEL WITH PIPE
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 6INCHES BELOW TOP OF FOOTING AT THEHIGHEST POTNT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSlTIVE GRAVITYOUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN B.E REMOVED SY PUMPtNG.3. THE DFAIN SHOULD BE LAID ON A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/A INCHANO 1/4 INCH DBOP PER FOOT OF DRAIN.
4. GRAVEL SpECtFtCAT.tONS: WASHED 1 1/2WITH LESS THAN 3% PASSING TH€ NO.2OO
JOB NO.93-€O TYPICAL WALL DRAIN DETAIL
Fro. 6
BACK FILL
10'1'r--::
COMPACTED
BAC K F ILL
(SEE REPORT
FOR BACKF!LL
RECOMMENDATIONS)
WASHED 1 1/2 lNCt{ TO
NO. 4 GRAVEL WITH LESS
THAN 3 PERCENT PASSING
THE NO.2OO SIEVE.
NOTE:
INSTALL EITHER
1. APPROVED MANUFACTURED
ANO PIPE. OR
12" MlN..
MANUFACTUREO DRAIN SYSTEM
PROVIDE GALVANTZED SCREEN
WEEP.HOLES PROVIDED AT
CENTER TO CENTER
4 INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC
THE DRAIN LINE SHOULD 8E LAID ON
RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 lNCH AND 1.'4
PER FOOT OF DRA]N AND LEAD TO A
GRAVITY OUTLET.
PIPE.
A SLOPE
INCH DROP
POS tTtVE
DRAIN SYSTEM
2.
3.
GFAVEL WITH PIPE OR
WEEP HOLES WITH GRAVEL
RETAINING WALL DETAIL
9. I3-60
TYPICAL EARTH
FIG.7
IInter-MountainlA f-rtgineerinslrd.
JuIy 2L t L994
Mr. Steve Isom
Isom & Associates
P.O. Box 9
Eagle, CO Bl-631
Re: Drainage ReportTract A-l- & A-2Project No. 94525E
Dear steve:
Enclosed please find a copy of the drainage report for Tract A-1
and A-2, Parce1 A, Lionts Ridge Filing No. 2, VaiI, Colorado. OnJuly 21, | !994 we faxed you a copy of the report without Appendix A.
Also enclosed is a red lined copy of your site plan. This plan
shows sorne revised grading as well as the drainage basin boundaries
and discharge points. The drainage study written by fnter-Mountainrefers to this site plan. I am assuning that you will revise theexisting grading plan and include it with the drainage report whenit is subnitted to the Town of VaiI.
The site plan was revised so that the site grading does not exceeda 50 percent (2:L) slope. A drainage swale was added behind thehouses. It is most desirable to have the swale ten horizonal feetfron the back wall but due to the site conditions this is notpossible without the addition of a retaining wall. As stated inreport, a well designed perimeter drained should be installed
around the foundation waII to help alleviate this problen.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
S j.ncerely,
fnter-Mountain Engineering, Ltd.
m1m
Enclosure
1h^U"ffT[di--
Martha L. Mi1ler, PE
Project Engineer
Box No. 978 . Avon, Colorado 81620 . 9/l9lfi7z Denver 893.1531
1420 Vance Street . Lakewood, Colorado 80215 . Phone: 2324158
DRAINIGE NEPOR!
FOR
,|IRACI e-l AND e-2
PARCEIT Ar IJfONTS RIDGE FIIJINC NO. 2
AONtf OF VAIIJ
EACIJE @UN,!y, COIORADO
PREPERED FOR3
ISOtt 6 ASSoCIAEES
. P.O. BOX 9
EAGIJE, COIrORADO 81531
PROI'ECT NO. 9{5258
itUIrI 199{
Introdluction
This report evaluates the drainage conditions of Tracts A-1 and A-2, Parcel A, Lionrs Ridge Filing No. 2, Vai1, Colorado. Both theexisting and developed conditions were studied.
The sites are located on the eastern section of Parcel A, north ofBuffer Creek Road and south of the Whi.te River National Forest.
See Figure 1. The area of Tract A-l- and A-2 are 0.485 and 0.375,respectively.
Existincr Conditions
Tracts A-l- and A-2 are currently undeveloped. Vegetation of thesite consists of native grasses and woods. The slope of the siteis approximately 50 percent, from the north to the soutb/southeast.
The site is located at the botton of the drainage basin located
between Buffehr and Red Sandstone Creeks. Approximately one
hundred and thirty-three (L33) acres are tributary to the site.
See Figure 2.
Runoff frorn the site and itrs tributary area flows to a swale alongthe north side of Buffer Creek Road. A high point that divides therunoff exists south of Tract A-Z on Buffer Creek Road.
Tributary Runoff
As previously stated, approxirnatety 133 acres are tributary toTracts A-l- and A-2. The cover type of the tributary area isclassified as woods and herbaceous. The hydrologic soil group ofthe tributary area is defined by the Soil Conservation Service(SCS) and Whj-te River National Forest as prinarily 'B' with srnallpercentage rCt soils. Using the graphical method of the SCSTechnical Release 55 (TR-55) progran the anticipated peak dischargefrbn the tributary basin was calculated.
In addition to calculating the peak discharge from runoff, theanticipated peak discharge from tnowmelt was also cotrputed usingthe coefficients found in the To$rn of Vail Subdivision regulations.
See Appendix A for the rainfall and snowtnelt runoff caLculations.The computed peak discharges frorn runoff and snowmelt are asfollows:
P.O.BoX 978
0910 N0TTIN6MI{ FOAO
lvoN. c0L0. 81820
(303) S49-s07e
ltrInter-Mountain
lAE tgineeringhd.
SUITE 101
14?0 VAI|C€ STnEET
LAXE|000, colo. 80215
(303) ?32-0i5S
7 /19/94
FIGURE
VICIN ITY MAP
SCALE: !" s IOOO'
-/ R\P
f,rqd
oohlnter-Mountain- Engineeringnd.
P,0.8ox 878
O9TO NOTTIMI{^N FOAI)
AVot{. coLo, 8r8?o
(3031 94$-s072
sullE 101
1420 v^r.cE STnEET
LAXEIooD, C0L0. B0?r5
(303) 232-0r58
Prorect No.
94525E
0r t./ 9v:
7 /1s/94
She€t No.
1
FIGURE 2 TRIEUTARY BASIN
l\
-J..tt
I
tr 'l // L<,
iisl:'."\i
JUNC (U.5. 2.t, 2 trt
scALi i 21000
: ] c I MrlE
l0OO O :0C\C 2aaC j y-O .i)':X 50OC 61:C 7C30 F:ti
^ : i::v:i:e
CONTOUR I\ TfRVAL 40 FE:T
NATIOI{AL GTCDETIC V:RiICAL DATUM OF I929
Table 1Tributary Basin
Peak Discharge
Frequency(years)Rainfall(cfs)Snohrmelt(cfs)
Lo 1.5 8.6
25 3.4 8.9
50 6.4 OA
L00 9.3 10. 6
The 2s-year snowrnelt. peak discharge will be used for designpurposes- see Appendix A for the worksheets and calculations.
The runoff from the tributary basin will flow south through TractA-2- approximately 40 feet east of the proposed house loca€ion. Aei-ghteen (18) inch curvert at a three (j) percent slope will bepraced beneath the driveway to pass the aistrrlrge. The capacity ofthis pipe is 9.9 cfs which is cipable of handring the 25-year sfonnevent. The Town of vail reguires that culvefts be ddsigned tohandle the 25-year storrn.
After passing beneath the driveway curvert, the runoff will flow tothe existing swale along the north side of Buffer creek Road. sitedevelopment will not increase the anount of tributary peakdischarge.
Site Runoff
The -anticipated peak discharge for the existing and developed siteconditions were calculated. The cornbinld site irea isapproximately 0.9 acres. The existing vegetation cover was assunedto be woods. The proposed cover was assumed to be asphalt and openspace. Tlre hydrologic soir group is rBr. The carculations ireincluded in Appendix A.
The site was divided into two discharge points. point A is east ofthe site and Point B is west of the site. see included site pran.Developrnent of the site changes the runoff quantity and patternslightly. The arnount o3 .=igirr runoff is very- minimjl cornplred toguantity of tributary runoff.
As previously stated calculations were completed for the existingsite conditions as well as developed sit" conditions. peakdischarge cal-curations were computed ior rainfall runoff as well assnowmelt runoff. The graphicar method of rR-55 was used to
calculate the rainfall guantities and the snowrnelt coefficientsfound the the Town of vair subdivision regurations was used tocarcurate tbe anticipated snor"rmert runofi. The values werecompared and the larger (more conservative) value used.
Below is a sumrnary of the anticipated peak discharges.
Table 2Site Peak Discharge(cfs)
Basin A Basin B
Existin
Atdischarge pointA, the site runoff increases from o.o cfs to o.1cfs. site runoff at discharge point B increases from 0.r. cfs to0.3 cfs. The increase in runoif is very rninirnal, especially incornparison to the tributary runoff.
Conclusion
rni: report has been prepared in conformance with the Town ofvailrs subdivision regulations which reguires drainage facilites tobe- designed to handl"e the 25-year stoin. A eight.6en inch (18,')cuLvert at a three percent rsa) slope is ne6d"d beneath- thedriveway to handle the runoff ironr the tributaiy Uasin. A1so, atwelve inch culvert shall be install beneath thL driveway at theintersection with Buffer creek Road. This culvert wilt alliw waterto pass beneath -the driveway. A four foot pan shall also beconstructed at the end of the driveway to prLvent runoff fronflowing onto Buffer creek Road. trre f,an wiit intercept runofffrowing down the driveway and direct it to the east. see siteplan.
rn addition, it is recomnended that a sware be constructed behindeach house to intercept runoff. The invert of the sware should bea rninimum of five horizonal feet frorn the back warr. The swareshould be one foot deep. see site p1an. Due to site gradingrestrictions, the swale is relatively cLose to the back of thehouse so it is also recommended th;t good perirneter drai.ns beinstalled to eLiminate any potential p5naind -"" tn" foundationwaIls.
APPENDIX A
TRTBUTARY BASIN
DTSCIIARGE CALCUI,ATIONS
'*?,",\i:]i, ^.^" fiInter-Mountain ,oro,n,"2ullE1!l
fioori;fff#oo "u'o lAEtgineering Ltd.'n^t*ooi''io[9:;lll;DA'E/By I ls lq
Dra,naae S+udrt - - hac+s A'l t A-2, Tarcl A, Lrafi's Rdae frltno ilt.
PtrrPoSe---EWm,ne ?enx D,s..Lnrqe iror, -tr,b,Atqflt basrns ustnq l-R-Sf
Gfop4tca.l l'1etl''ad, 'C-ontpul<- *ra' lampate- elsniq V""Jr]'develil*C 5iiz r'u,noff -l
I
ula,rt bqsrrtts *ttls qre dehnr/ bq lAe *i/
.5*ttc tscs\ . d^d *hc While'K,uez.'AJo^hunai
1o lit,u, r,11 y cit' t t'it, tl* c J usrd lc 4r lr nc 41'tc-
a0r I 'Or6Lps-
t. *:u'\, 5€5, Satl Su,vtq of tsp,tr,-.(vpsr,iil ftth,Lclcrola, paris o_t tbqlc', car{rcirl I prii,ir, !i,.,.,ritc|
J-ssurC Maq li+L?. Wh,le Rtvu tInhmal Htesf, -Drah 9t I S,trrtu a{+de
114,1q Uoss Su/veot Are|, Whk?rtu I Aralo.i,;
Mohno[frrest , (olorodo' ,?at1s o{ &qlc ,6arrtcfu,l,
!1rca-, ItKta' !-gum^-,i' Anfl Tll, t112.
*,1 Anseyahan Styvitc hqdr.aluqtc gr I qrav-p:41- Fo"say .obbly'
.
fcra,h , zs-(os ilo Lvpe -bra";.8'
WhrL Rtucr Na"l-,ona I Fc-,r*t hydra lo4rc sa,l
3qb e - Go.letrw-_fyre Fo,rrrlq Zom2Vu-
3qZc - -T-stlura- E1're f-ornrl'ls <ar,+l-{-
4b18 - ka:lvr tre 4A -to|6lo slc,;c
Se.a H1u'c A-l 6r *4ic lrmrfs fir eacl sorl qrwp.
U S. G. S n",qpS O^r"rJ =,iC f eCOfrnn iatrii(( f{{{( r,r-:ed iO
dL4L( riirrr-i( f i,l tetitiaf lL Wprs . -T:wo veaciatk f4xs ,uevC
:etccirC {.ra,-n-J7b\cs 2.ZE'ond Z.Ld t'
Flerbaneo.r-s - fvir.Xkirc CSI qrCst, wcrr'{s , anrd
l0vJ-qrcw,rrq br uril I ,nri1 ir Lr.l:h -int i, , .Lr Zi;.t\-,li.i-Noox..' ) -'
See Fg u,c A-L lu. *i" l'r'l fr.,, eq)\ qrcW
CN
tlrsnq #l a.Dl,, t,\ft,,noirftt +fu ttyrt nv,rrV,( tCt)ti, rhe Jv, tylttq
ay? u ' Ut 5 dr Yt ,f . n,,'1 to lcC 62. - )
TYovN t
j'5'65'rt s\o;:
zlA'b7'/:t:ii:r
'GrA,-,11 "7>'
-:e.rcup'{'^
-C'rcv) L
ohlnter-lfountain
llEttgineeringr'd.
P. O BOX 978
OO77 ME|CALF ROAD
AVON. COLO DO 81620
(303) 949-972
sulTE 101
1420 VANCE SIREET
UKE WO QD. COLORADO 802 1 s
(303) 232.0158
PRoJEcr No ltt 528
brarnoqc S-iudq :Tracls A-l t A-2, Lron'sQ,r1qt }:.l,nq (Jo Z
Trme oF Cottcen*ahan
The hnc of cor,cenlt-afian wo:Clalculakl &rnrhe hqaraul,cc*JlUmlsf dnbnce ptrnt An oyrtrw,/ trapczordr! cha"ney'5ht,p€- ,1uos ,tsrd h dekrmtn<_ -yf+ "Ch'asnd Ftor,t" hmt
Vl,,+r
Thc hw ol tancenlvatrtl\ uta'> dtJr,tntnctt to bc /-flr
?caKD rscharq e &"^R,nfil I
luk dsclwvu\ Wt ealala.lrd Lt5tnq +hz ', /rocrdur<s 6t
Devtmm,nQ 'leaK Flau_s tn (olorodo" hanAbok- Tl1.ts j,e*.,,tnte
,reI?!lts\ L usL. of hautt
-5-l ,'o-fia'chrd frqurc'A-3,\ 4o dilcrn tc\, p.<a k cl rr- hiirya.
Q:try thf . o.b:rc- tnfa,Ao;it,,t 'fit-.tttcwtny (lat naks uJeye_
drltrtracsl:
tuatu)J-tud
16 -,1U(
2{''1rp1
5o- J'qr
l0() ' I'1c</
- (now rne l*
.
Co*, r, +!L .p <a k,
^
trAqq' t laa6 : na,,r rnoll. h *,0 .lo
m ^hl
it U'.t.t-r c t4^ <Vrqu vatL^e *o desrqn drarnuqe Sfr*CfureS
Fr equenry
t0'uea?
1t-1tr^t
| 0tt- '1car
Usesno,lnelt vo\ues.
)esrqrt of ttrc '2s- yeo,t s;lz,r,\
,A,: 133. 2 aL( <s
Snanrwll 0tl6rpt
O.o65.klacte
,012 dLIL
0.080 '4f or,.
-&b-D-seiasr (o)
/' 5- cts3.rl ck
6. Ll ck1.3 cts
?otrD,*insc ( o)
3-6 cfs
.6 c|s
10,6 c{s
Z\-\av O.0;b7 -.'7;uc
o
hlnter-Mountain
lAftrgineeringLrd.
P.O.BOX S7B
0910 NoTItNcHAX FOAO
Avo[ coLo. 81620
{303) S48-s07?
sdITE !0t
t.?O VAXCE STAEET
LAKEiooD. COLo. 802!5
(303) 232-0r58
Pnoj cct No,
Y-1,.l.L
O!t! ./ 8y:
7 /18 '91
shert No.j
FIGURE A_ 1 HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS
ai%,
!80
R SIVJ !8l0ooi.t.
-3 9' 3;',39"
30"R 80 \/106' 2
, )\_AL: I 1_ -ULI t C I r.i1Li
lcoc t lCCt 2C{jO j rao rlao 5000 6&C ICCO Flar
CONTOUR IN Tt: FVAL 4O FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC V..RiICAL DAIUM OF I929
I I Ll.v:i5a
P.0.Box s78
O€TO M)TTINGHAX ROAO
Avo[ coLo. 8!520
(3031 819-5072
ltrInter-MountainlA Ettgineeringlrd.
SUITE IO'
!420 VANCE STF€ET
LAK€|r000. COL0. 802 t5
l3o3) 232-0156
ProJcct No.q4525t
O!t! ,/ 8y:
7 /18 i94
FIGURE A_2 VEGETATiVI COVER
w
fI
a,
?
LfGt\ID
ffi
trffi
,". 4lJ:
:r'tRBACE0US
:-i
.)t7000^;l
,80
N 8I W R BO VJ.t8lo6rr t. I()6'22'30"
, scAL[ ] 24000
I rv riI=:+:$3 c tttc :iit :.lc zocc ri:: 6ori ,c],, :€tj
I : r , (rloiaa:ai
:-:- :- j:-: _:_::::
CC\TOUR lf'lTl:RVAL 4O FEE-i-
ITATIOXAL GEODETIC V:FiICAL DATU[A OF ]929
P.O.8oX 978
09!0 r{0TIINCH^X FoAo
AVO}( COLo. 8t6?O
(3031 9.9-5072
lllnter-MountaintOneeringra
SUIIE :OI!:20 YA'rCE STREET
L^x€riooc. c0L0. 80?:5
(303) ?3e-0 r5g
ProJcct Nc.
94525E
Dltc./ 8y:
7 /18/94
FlGLrRl A- 3
Figure S- /Peok Dischorge in
csm Per inch of Runoff
Versus
Time of Concenlrotion, Tc
Typell Storm Dislribution
Type ll-A Slorm Dislribulion
lsE.*
E!t
a)
I
@o
o
(,t
ano
:
too
to
to
30
oso
@
o_
o.3 C.a o.7 o.! 0.9 |
Time of Concenlrolion Tc - Hours
o 6
Qulak ER-55 Ver.5.{6 g/Nr
Ergauted: 1|ls06st0 O?-la-199{
TRAqfS A-1 & A-2, PARCET, A
I,ION,g RIDGE SUBDIVISTONFILINC NO. 2\TAIL, COI'RADO
RUNOFF CURVE NUUBER DATA
3 3 t 3 3: t 3 3 3 ! ! t t 3::3:3: !3!:3 3S 3:3 3 33t: t 3 3::::33 3: S !: ! 3 ! !!:::: ! t r 3 3::
Conposite Area! EXIETING
EREA CN
SURFACB DESCRIP:IfON (acreB)
B ?9OODS, FAIRc rooD8, FAIRc BEREaCEOUS, FArR
tL2.7A 603.0{ 73L7.42 7L
cp!{posrrE ABEA ---> L33.21 6L.? ( 62 )tt!!33t3t!33::!!:::s3!t:!!:::t:t3ts333:!:t:3t33t3:tt3
7
Quick TR-5s Ver.s.46 s/N3Executed: 1ls10s35 07-L4-1994 Cs\TR5S\9,[525-E.TCT
TRACTS A.1 & A.2, PARCEIJ A
IJION,S RIDGE SUBDIVISIONFILING NO. 2VAIIJ, COIJORADO
Tc COI'iPUTATIONS FoR: EXTSTTNG
SHEET FIJOW (Applicable to Tc only)segment IDSurface descriptionManningrs roughness coeff., nFlow length, L (total < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-hr rainfa1l, p2
Land slope, s
0.8.002 !r (n*L)
1-1
!ilooDs, DENSE
0.8000ft 300.0in 1.000tt/ft o.1ooo
brs 1. 41
L-2
unpavedft 2050. oft/tt. 0.2900
ft/s a.6aa7
hrs O.O7
1.41
o.o7
f,ssu med o, tvopz-otdal
C.l"onre.l wrthl 1{g
fultow,r5 descr,p-ho+
IV
= 0.03
(hrs) 1.sl
0.5 0.4P2*s
SEALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOWsegment fDSurface (paved or unpaved) ?Florr length, LWatercourse slope, s
0.5Avg.V= Csf* (s)wheres Unpaveal Csf = 16.13,1spaved Csf = ZO.3ZA?
*=L/ (360o*V)
CHENNEL FI,oW
Segment IDCross Sectional Flow Area, aWetted perimeter, pw
Hydraulic radius, r = a/pvChannel slope, sManningrs rougbness coeff., n
2/3 L/21. '19V=
Flow length, L
T=L/ (3500*V)
sq. ftftfttt/ft
ft
hrs
1-3
9.75
11.49
0.849
0.3300
0.0450
ft/s ZL7.o{as
2050
0.03
TOTAIJ TIME
Worlatreel Graphical Peak Discharge metnf
ty l"1tl'l Darc J- 18-14.
8
P roJect
Loca! ton
t
Checked Da te
(.
yr
1n
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Scoru ,t L Storu 42 Scora f3
l0 25 50
1,1 t.1 L.,/-
too
2.4
Iottlal
(Use C!{
CotrpuEe
Uotc peak dlscharge, qu ..... cso/ln(Use T" and I./P rllth Exhiblc 4-_)
Runoff, a .....
(Froru porksheec 2). ln
Pond and snaop adJustocnE factor. F
(Usc percent pond and """rp "a".-
.P
slth table 4-2. Factor ls 1.0 for
zero. percent. pond and suanp area.)
Pcak dtscharge, q,
(t{herc qo - quAoQF
P)
235 lzss f z35
3l?,otlrr-rs
lo l r.o l t.o
za5
o-19
/.o
9.'cfs
(210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986)
r.s 13.4 1c.q q-5
^
t
Clrcle one : CFiiG\Divetdited-\--_...-'J
1. Data:
Dralnage area .......j.. \- 0.2082 rd2.(acres/640)
Runoff curve nuober .... cN - (oZ (Froro uorksheeu 2)
Tloe of concentraEloo .. T. - l.S t hr (Frocr vorksheec 3)
Rainfall dlstilbuclon rype - T (I, IA, II, III)
Pond and sr.ratrp areas rpread
fhroughout'watershed
Frequency .. .. .. r.
Ralnfall, P ( 2i-hour)
abs!ract1on, I"
rdth table 4-1.)
ralP
D4
SITE
DISCEARGE CALCUI,ATIONS
P. O. BOX 97E
@77 uErCALF ROAt)
A WN,CA-ffiADO 81620
(JgJ) 919-5072
IInter-Mountain
AErgineerint{Lrd-
surlt rot
I42O VANCE SIREET
LAKEWO@. COLORADO 802' 5
(JOJ) 2J2-0t58
rnoo8 Sludu -Tro,+ A'l t.kL ?nrrel A Lumrs'R".lqe Fl'no No.L
S'te-?,rnoFF
Conpwk (xt*tr^,q o"nd dt.uebped etk yunoF{- The 1o,il QroulL5a/nd vQclahuc Jfu,cu dehni,nd €,r *he h,btiarq fuli.(Fqwe ' A-l t A-2) ur<le ascd. -fhe st]e ts )dtv,dtc{
tn' lwo dis-charqe l)otrtf5 , A- Ec,t[ of *ne 3tk * B-
NpsI 5tdc of W 1lt .
CNJ
-/1
Usrn4 'ihe tnForrnoAuvt *yrrvvr:rlL' urcye dd<rmirwd .
BP.s,N
A
Vqut" A'l t AZ , CtJ '. Er *'lr<-
ErrsixqGo'Ee-ne&pd-75
Itotou
tu
Tkc firvrr o{ Cllncuhohon ww dt}trmtrtu,l 4rr eacA hastn f"onttht hldnur,ralll- mosl dslwnct p0n*.
i&.,n
A
B
fn:h n4- 6.4d
ct,s0
Devel ,P-'
a.B
04t
(s, nq F,q *re S- I
ColonC,do " '( Fgr,.,t
Fyequ.ncq
,3 J"l
?,i Y,',
h ryr fnc "P, o a d,rrr s €' ZDetrrn' n ijPco K Ylar:s, 11f,a'w\ Ttt\L l'(oceducg ra( we{Jfm\nrMrc4
A-3) ^ ler'( d,tcla,orcs u.*.tL Calcutd+d ., )eo( QtAUQvC',Bn!'n A Bns,nB
E<'<hnrl -NuPln,r"rl
6.C+
0,ar
0.68
o. t0
o.0l
a .0L
0,05
0,0(
0. t1
0.Ztn
o.38
o.q(
r<l_
'al;",?idiF *o^, hlfrter-Mountain ,o,o ,n*,?'#,/!l
?ffi'&trir9rb'6'" ^AEtgineeringLtd.
L*t*oob:';fiiiiig;%1ji
OA fE // 8yt-ts-Q,l
- t ruL A-t t A-L,?a/cel A, LtonBRdqs frl,nq Nc,. L
Tl"e p.-ck dcsl,alro. ?/.,ye6y"1 fuortllundi l5' L B^'n
colculakcl
So.s,n E
,l|Jsbe
b ,ut ou'!
o,o4
0,0s
0.05
0.05
lxlu"l
httdopd-7oEt auE\
0.05
O,os
0,0b
0.06
SnuugrJL(p&asl(et /nu.)
o.oa{
o obl
0,na
0.oso
krshnq. Udtud ,(, "]oul:\ (.Ize out)
t0
25
5d
t00
U. UJ
o.bd
0.04
0,04
0.ol
0,01
0,0 |
0.0 |
Ctsnltare p.ok db.harqe frann rarnfr [ io' BAsr r''t A
5AaurntoH-_ Uy_ largu vo{(rs.
3ns,rB
Tt-e;-sd 'Proro-. d
Desrqn Qt, fhc Z}-ya,t sturff\
=O.0 0 00,=o.l
,08
ll
Quict TR-55 Ver.5.116 8/NsExecutedl: 16:053{5 07-20-199{
TRACES A-1 E A-2, PARCEIT A
I,ION'g RIDGE SUBDIVTSTON
FfIJING NO. 2
VAfLr, COLORADO
RUNOFF CURVE NUUBER DATA
.!?a!!.....aaaaaa a aa a a a a aa a aa aa aa a aaaa a i 4.... .a. a a a -
ComposLte Area: EXIS'IING-A
IREA CN
SURAACE DE8CRTPIIoN (acres)
B WOOD8, FAIR
collPoslTE IREA ---> 0.25 60.0 ( 60 )3t!33:3:!:::::!3r3::333::::3333:S!::!:!!!::3333t3333:
o.zs 60
IL
Quick TR-ss Ver.5.46 s/N:Executed: 16:15:59 07-2O-L994 C:\TR55\525-A-E.TCT
TRACTS A-1 & A-2, PARCEL A
LION,S RTDGE SUBDIVISION
FILING NO. 2VAIL, COLORADO
TC COMPUTATIONS FOR8 EXISTING-A
SHEET FLOIS (Applicable to Tc only)
Segment IDsurface descriptionManningrs roughness coeff. , nSIow length, L (total < or = 3OO)Two-yr 24-lrt rainfall, P2Land slope, s
0.8
.002 * (n*IJ)
A-1
WOODS-DENSE
0.8000ft L25.Oin 1.000
0.5 0. 4P2*s
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOWgegment IDSurface (paved or unpaved) ?Flow length, IJWatercourse slope, s
o.5Avg.V= Csf* (s)where! Unpaved Csf =Paved Csf =
T=t,/ (3600!tV)
16. 1345
20.3282
ft/tt
hrs
ftft/tt
tt/s
hrs
sq. ftftfttt/ ft
0.4000
0 .40
0.0
0. o000
0.0000
0.00
0.0000
0
o.o0
ToTAL TIME (hrs)
0.40
0.00
= 0.00
0.40
CHANNEI FIOW
Segment IDCross Sectional Flow Area, aWetted perirneter, pw
Hydraulic radius, r = a/pwChannel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n
r.4g * t'/'* "'/"V=ft/s
n
Plow length, L ft
T=L/ (36OO*V) hrs
..aiaa;........
0.00
0.00
o.000
0.0000
0.0000
o
Worksheet 4: Graphical peak
t3
too
2.4
5,lf
6. t5
t.o
Discharge meth
"y t1U1
Checked
u"c. ?16'1tl
Da te
Dtalnage area ..
Runoff curve nuober .... CN -
.Tloe of concentracion .. T" -
Ralnfall dtstrtbuclon cype
Pond and srlaop areas spread
chroughouc'satershed
(Froo r.rorkshee c 2)
hr (Froo eorksheec 3)
(T, IA, II, III)
percenc of Ao (- acrelr or o12 covered)
Storo {tl Stora 12 Scorq /3
lo 2{5d
t.1 t.1 2.2
cfs
(210.VI.TR.SS, Second Ed., June 1986)
("O
04r\
E
abstraccloa, I_
l|lth teble 4-l:)
yr
1n4.
5.
A
7.
8.
Intclal
(Usc CN
Coopute l?I?
o
Unlc peak'dlscharge, qu .... cso./ln(Use T. and I"/p rlrh Exhlblc 4 -_)
Runoff, a ....,(fron uorkshe.. ii.'-:""' ln
pond and sr,.aap adJustoent factor. F(Usc percenc pond and .rr"op "r".- .P
uich table 4-2. Faccor 1s 1.0 for
zeao. perccnc pond and sr.ranp area.)
Peak discharger Q_ ......
P(lJhere q, - quAnQFp )
o.c4 | d.to
I.o lr,o lr.o
a,)Olo,otlo,oL 6.03
o
od
circLe onu, @ DevL loped A - (trn=r s,ou)
l. Data:
Z. Frequency
3. Rainfall,P ( 2{-hour )
Locatlon AAC | ,1.-
D-{
tLl
Qulak ER-55 Var.s.{6 S/tf!Excout€d3 t6s07:17 07-ZO-L99a
ERACTS A-1 & A-2, PARCEL A
IJION,S RIDGE SUBDIVISION
FIIJING NO. 2VAIL, COITORIDO
RITNOFF CURVE NUI.iBER DATA
3 3 3:3 t: t t ! t t 3:3 3 t 3 t t 3 3:: t t 3 t ! ! ! 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 ! 3 3 3::3 3 !: t::::: ! ! !: r I r r t ! 3
Conposite Areas BAIBTING-B
ST'RFICE DESCRIPTION
AREA CN(acr€Bl
B WOODs, FAIR 0.68 50
couBoSrTE AREI ---> 0.68 60.0 ( eo 1rr333ttr:33!3tt333tt3:::i33tts333:3!3:::3S:t!!!:!tt!:
o |5
Quick TR-55 Ver.5. {6 SrlN3
Executeds 16:16!59 O7-20-L994 C!\TR55\525-B-E.TCT
TRACTS A-1 t A-2, PARCEIT A
I,ION'S RTDGE SUBDIVISION
FIIJING NO. 2VAfL, COLORADO
TC COMPUTATIONS bON: NXTSTTNG-B
SIIEET FIJOW (Applicable to Tc only)seguent ID B-1Surface descriptioD WOODS-DENSEManningrs roughness coeff., n O.8OOOFlow length, L (total < or = 300) fL 180.0fwo-yr 24-hx rainfall, P2 in 1.ooo
m-
0.5 0.4
SttAIrLOIt CONCENTRAIEDSeglrent fDSurface (paved orFIow lengtb, L
Land slope, s
0.8.007 * (nrrt)
FIJOW
tt/tE 0.4900
brs o.50 0.50
0.00
= 0.00
0.50
Watercourse Elope,
unpaved) ?
s
0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.13115Paved Csf = 2O.32Az
T=Irl (3600*V)
CEANNEIJ FIOW
Segaent IDCross Sectional Flold Area, aI{etted perineter, pw
Hydraulic radius, r = a,/prilChannel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n
- 1.{9 * ,"/t * "t/"V=
Flolr lengtb, L,
T=L/(3600*V)
fttt/ft
f,t/s
brs
sq. ftftfttt/ft
ft/s
ft
hrs
0.0
0.00.00
0.0000
o. o0
o.00
0.00
0.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
TIUE (hrs)
It'
Worksheet 4: Graphical Peak Discharge method
ProJccc NU1
covcrcd)
1tE
1n
ln
2.
3.
q.
5.
6.
7.
8.
too
z-+
teIP
Unlc peak 'dlscharge, qu .... cso,/in(Usc T" and I"/p ulch Exhibtc {-_)
Runoff, a ....... ......... ln(Froo norksheec 2).
Pond and svaop adJusttrenE factor, F_ ....(Usc percent pond and suetrp area . P
r.rtth table 4-2. Factor ls 1.0 for
zero.- p€rcenc pond and.suanp area.)
9. ?eak dtschargcr Q, .cfs
(lltrere qp - CuAJFp)
'soo
,ozl o'q I o,to
l.o r'o I t.a
5do
4.tE
l.o
o.or | 6,ozl o"o5 0-08
(2I0-VI-TR.$5, Second Ed., June l9E6)
By o"t" ?-!t1Y
Localton I rtt*< ll-l & A- L Crrccked _ Date
ctrcle onut @rilDiiibloired
l. Daca:
.lOl\ (Wesr Sod
Dralnage area .. .. .. . ,r. . A; - d^OO I I o12 (acres,/640)
Runoff curve nuober .... CN - 60 (Eron gorksfreec 2)
.Tlue of concenEraclon .. T" - O.-Sn hr (Froo uorksheec 3)
Rainfall dtstrlbutlon type - T- (I, IA, II, III)
Pond and suatrp arees spread ,A,(hroughouc' r'acershed .:. .. . - L)percen! of A_ ( acEes or "12
Frcquency
Inttlal
(Use CN
CoDpute
abs!racclon, I_ ......
rdth rable 4-l:)
SEorl[ g1 Stora $2 Ston 03
1)%50
t.1 t.1 2-z
D-{
n
Quick TR-55 Ver.5.i!6 g/u!
E*€out€dr 15s5{:07 07-20-1991
IRICTS a-l & A-2, PARCEIJ A
LION,8 RIDGE SUBDIVTSTON
FXIJING, NO. 2VAIL, COLORADO
RT'NOFF CURVE NUUBER DATA33::::33!3333:t:333t:33S:ttti::::::!!ts3333!:::!::::t!t33S:33tttts
Conpoal.te Ar€ar PROPOBED-A
AREA CNSURIICE DEgCRfPrroN (acre8,
B OPEN 8PICE, FAIRB IIIPEBVIOU8 ERBA
cot{po8r8E IREA ---> O.tz 71.9 ( 75 )r33:tttltStt3tttttSStt!!tt!!:!!!333::!:!:!!!3:tt3:!3t
0.10 690.03 98
r8
Quick TR-55 ver.s.46 S/N:
Executed: 16:17;43 O7-2O-L994 C:\TR55\525-D-A1.TCT
TRACTS A-1 e A-2, PARCEL A
LION,S RIDGE SI'BDIVISION
FIIJINC NO. 2
VAIIJ, COLORADO
Tc COI{PITTATTONS iOn, pnOpOSED-A
EfiEET FLOW (Applicabte to Tc oDIy)se$tent rD A-1gurface description GRASS-SEORTManningrs loughness coeff., n 0.1500Flow length, L (total < or = 300) ft 125.0Tiro-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 1.000Land slope, s ft/tL 0.4000
0.8.002 * (nlrL)
,tl -brs 0.11
0.5 0.4
A-2
ASPHAIJT
0 . 0110
69.0
1. 000
o. 1000
0.01
P2
o.L2
0.00
0.00
SEAI,I.,OW CONCENTRATED
Segment IDSurface (pavedl or
F1ow lengtb, L
FIJOW
CHANNEIT FIJOW
Segment IDCross Sectional Flon Area, aI{etted perineter, PwHydraulic radius, r = a/pwChannel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n
watereourse slope,
unpaved) ?
s
0.5Avg.V = Csf .l (s)nheres Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Paved csf = 2O.32Az
r=L/ (3600*V)
2/3 7/2L,49 * r * sV=
n
Flold length, L
T=L/ (3600rrv)
ftft/ft
ft/ s
brs
sq. ft
fLftft/tt
ft/s
ft
hrs
0.0
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0
0.00
o.L2TOTAL TII'{E (hrs)
o
Qulclc TR-55 Ver.5.45 srlNs
Executed: 16s20:14 o7-20-L994 c3 \TRs5\s2s-A-Dz. TCT
(hrs )
r1
o.01
0.00
0.00
o.01
TR.ACIS A-1 t A-2, PARCEL A
IJION'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION
FTIJING NO. 2VAIIJ, COLORIDO
Tc COUPUTATTONS iOn, pnOpOSED-e
SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only)
Segment ID A-3
ASPEAI,T
0.01103oo, ft 13.3in l. oooft/tt 0.0200
m-0.01
0. 5 0.4P2*s
SEAIJLOW CONCENTRATED FIOWSegment IDSurfase (paved or unpaved)?Flow length, IJ
Watercoutse slope, g
0.5Avg.V.= Csf * (s)where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Pavedl Csf, = ZO.32A2
T=IJ/ (3600!tV)
Surface description
Manningrs rouglness coeff., nFIow length, L (total < or =Two-yr 24-hr rainfalt, P2Land slope, s
0.8.997 * (n*L)
2/3 L/2L.49 * r * s
f,ttt/tt
tt/s
hrs
sg. ftftfttt/ft
0.0
0.0000
0. 0000
0.00
CIIANNEIJ TLOIr
Segnent IDcross Sectional Flow Area, aI{etted perimeter, PwHydraulic radius, x = a/psCbannel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff. , n
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.0000
0.0000
V=ft/s 0.000o
ft0
hrs o. oo
TOTAT TTUE
l. Dara:
zo
tq
2-1
azo
0,s1
t-o
o covered)
2.
3.
yr
1n
1n4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
InlBial
(Use ct
CoEpu te
abstEacclon, I-
vtth rabte 4-ll)
relP
Unte geak discharge, q
(use r" and r"/p *i.h .';i;;;'ii..-;"" '
.cso/ln
Runoff, a.....(Fron uorkshe;; ;i:":" " " ln
Pond and svaop adJusttrcn! factor, F_ ....(Usc percenc pond and sueEp area . P
elch cable 4-2. Fecror ls 1.0 for
zero.- p€rcent pond and snanp arca.)
Peak dtschargrr {O
(Hhere 9r - quArQFp )
o
1.0 lt.o I t.c)
aD1 | o.oa lo.o' cfs o,l0
(210-VI.TR.55, Second .8d., June 19g6)
Dralnage aree .......,;.. Aa - O- OOO Z to12 (acres/640)
Runoff curve nunber .... CI
.Tlne of concenrraclon .. T^
l5 (Frorq sorksbcec 2)
pcrcenc of A_ ( acEes or nt2
Ral,nfall dlsrrlbuclon type - Tf (I, IA, II, tII)
Pond and ssaop areas spread
rlrroughouc' watershed .:.... -
A.ZZ ar (Froo vorksheec 3)
Frcqucncy
Ralnfall,P (2l-hour)
Scora 0l Stora fl2 Scora 03
lo z5 50
t.1 ,.1 2.2
o.
D4
2l
gulslB IR-55 Vcr.5.{6 8/\2
Exsaut€d3 16t37r17 07-20-1994
rRtAcTa A-1 [ A-2, PlRCEr, A
IrXON'8 RIDGE SUBDMSION
FIITING, NO. 2
VAIIT, COIPRjADO
RI'NOFF CURVE NT'I.IBER DATA
! t 3 3 3t 3: S !3: t 3 ! 3 t 3::: r ! S 3! 3 r 3 t:3 3 3:3:3 t 3 t 3 3 3 3 t S S 3 3: ! !::3 !: t 3: t 3 3 3 3
Conposi.te Areas PROPOSED-rEST
AREA CN
SURAaCE DESCRIPEION (aare3)
B OPEf 8PICB, FArRA DTPAAVTOUS EREA
cot{BosrTE aREA ---> 0.81 76.2 ( 76 I33ttttt3:tt:33:ttt33t3t3t3t3t3333:3333t3t3:tt3: 33:t::
0.61 69. 0.20 98
2L
Quick TR-55 Ver.5. {6 SrlNs
Executeds 15:34:12 07-2O-L994 C:\TR55\525-B-D.TCT
TRtrCTS A-1 & A-2, PARCEI, A
TION'S RIDGE SUBDIVTSION
FfIJING NO. 2
VAIL,, COLORADO
Tc Co}'IPUTATIONS rOn: PnOPOSED-B
SHEET FLoW (Applicable to Ic only)
SegBent ID B-1 B-2Surface description GR-ASs-SHORT PIPE
Manningrs roughness coeff., D 0.1500 O.O24o
Flow length, IJ (total < or = 300) ft 141.0 30.0
Two-yt 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 1.000 1.000
Land slope, s ft/ft 0.3800 0.0300
0.8
.00? * (n*IJ)
m-hrs O.Lz + 0. 02 = 0. ]-tl0.5 0.,,1P2*s
SHAIJIJOW CONCENTRATED FIIOW
Segment IDsurface (pavedl or unpaved)?Flolr leDgtb, L,
Watercourse slope, s
0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)wheres Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Paved Csf = ZO.32AL
T=L/ (3500!tV)
CIIANNEIJ FtOW
Segment fDCross Sectional Flow Area, a sg.ft O.OO
Wetteal perineter, Plr - ft o.oottydraulic radius, | = a/Pv ft O.OOO
ChaDneI slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n
2/3 t/21.49 * r * s
ft 0.0ft/ft o.o0oo
ft/s 0.0000
hrs 0.00
ft/ft o. oooo
0.0000
= 0.00
V=tt/s 0.0000
n
Flord lengtb, I, ft o
T = L / (36OO*,V) hrs O.O0 = 0.00
.a.aa. ....4
TOTAL TIUE (hrs) 0.14
23
Quick lR-55 Ve!.5.46 s/Ns
Executed: 16:35!17 07-20-199{c: \TRss\s2s-B-D2 . TCA
TRACTS A-1 & A-2, PARCEIJ A
I,ION,g RIDGE SUBDIVISION
FILING NO. 2' VAfL, COLORADO
Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: PROPOSED.B
SHEET FL,oW (Applicable to Tc only)
Aegment ID B-3surface description cRAss-SIIoRT
Manniugrs roughness cgeff., D 0.1500
Flow length, L (total < ar = 300) ft 205.0Two-yr'24-br rainfall, P2 in 1.000
Land slope, s ft/tt 0.1000
0.8.002 * (n*IJ)
m-hrs
fttt/tL
tt/s
hrs
sq. ftftftft/fL
ft
hrs
0
o.00
ft/s 0.0000
o.27
0.00
= 0. O0
0.27
o.27
0.0
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.5 0.4
sEAI.,!OA CONCENTRATEDgegEent IDSurface (pavecl orFlow length, L
P2
FLOW
unpaved) ?
CIIANNEIJ FIJOW
SegEent IDCrosa SectioDal Flotf Area, aWetted perilreter, PwHydraulic radius, r = a,/I\fChaunel slope, sManningrs roughness coeff., n
- 1. {9 * t'/t * "'/'
Watelcourse slope, s
0.5Avg.V= Csf * (s)lthere: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345Paved Csf = 20.32A2
T = L,/ (3600tiv)
V=
Flort length, L
T=L,/ (36OO*V)
o. o0
0.00
0.000
0.0000
0.0000
TrUE (hrs)aa.a..
\Yorksheet 4: Graphical Peak Discharge method,
74
prorccr ?* , A, L'"nf "",*e h1,r&Zzvl\tJ,,l o"c" 7-lE'?9
DateLocac(on-Fa ct A- I t A-L Checked
Clrcle one:
l. Daca:
PrcsenE @
Dralnage area ....... j.. eo - O"OOl3 qt2 (acrcs,/640)
Runoff curve nuabir .... cll - 10, (Fron vorksfeec 2
Tlae of concencraglon .. T. hr (Froo uorkshegc 3)
Rainfall dlsrrlburton rype - T (t, IA, II, III)
Pond and slraEp areas cpread
dhroughouc'satershed covered)
2.
3.
Er!qucncy
Reinfa 11,P (2t-hour)
too
2.4
570
6-63
,.D
-
o-45
yr
ln
1n4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Inttlal
(Use CN
Coapute
abstracclonr I" ....
slth cabtc 4-1.)
ralP . ..
9.
Untc peak 'dlscharge, 9u .... cso/tn(Use T" and I"/p r.,lth Exhlbtc i-_)
Runoff, C ..... ....:...... tn(Erora uorksheec 2).
Pond and straop adJustacnt factor, F- ....(Use pcrcenc pond and sr.raEp area . P
ulch cable 4-2. Facror is 1.0 for
zero- percenc pond and.stanp area. )
Peak dtschargcr <lO ... .cfs
(Hhere qO - quAEQFp)
(2I0-VI.TR.55, Second.Ed., June t98d)
a.-36 | o.sz
,.o I l.o
6 0.38
Sconl 4l Stora 42 Ston 93
lc z5 50
1.1 t.1 2.2
D4
DRAINAGE FACII,ITIES
,*irf,?i&!,.^" ftInter-Mountain ,,ro nn,Eu']fr]!l
TWiEIfSr;8'6n I|AE gineeringltd.'*'**:-;ffiM!i,,d
DaE / ar
(-r t
-.fat\aae- Jflrdu - |')- ,?orttl A. Lton's R,/or El,no No 2
A\ett SvE
l,lse *he 25-,1cor plak Cleharqe frrtnihc +vtb*b1 lzs,n pl,a5
''Bas,o I .
Q, Qr, (Tr,b,lor1 Bor,n) , Orr( Bat,n 6)
8-1 .fs + O' 3.c,F1
= 1.L cFs
O' H 46tra'lz-
n= 0.o21 cc$")
S: O.oL (x,o)
ilsrnq charts -the Sllw:rrrq '4acrl'hcs wrll sal-rs{1 *Ic.
obauc ftAvvlnu'ils'. r
21" cM( Q 2o/o
19' cMP @- z-(od/o
Uce d 18" CtlP @ jEo
h-'IY(''-''' wP= z\(
=.iI (1,J' ' z1i(1lrz)'- lnl h- =l-lt ++
R't,,'##
': o" 36 -Fl-
s -- o-03
r,,_ L+1 . \, .tr- r'l*- o#< (r-rr{0.3s) ''(o.os)'''
= l,t c{s v-
;rqglqill€S
1\! o,ll,,o\tiu)d, (ia|aLti'q ,a( 1ht 5woys , orrunA, '\9 hrmrs sv| ,.tn( Olt)tAttN)tL ta00Lt1'4 At +f\C SwOlrs uI(w\U 'yt1c IlUYlltS t 05
Cllc.,llA'td - -Thc a rl,lttv$,| o{-r,r"nc,{f dra'nAq +o 4u.0orAl r-: u./nl(n/uJl
?u:f l!,'1 6^e5uyed,,fro.tr 1+ +fu svvJl!,cdn ttgrnl'le ,lt.t tfllori\of
rb.,r tav t (.lndl.Yvtr Cn{ortht rDr\i I
2b
Triangular ChanDeI Analysls A Oesign
Open Channel - Uniform flow
Worksheet Na.ue3 94525
CotmeDt: TRACT A-1 - SWAIJE BEaIND, HousE
solve tr'or Discharge
Given Itrput Data!Left Side slope.. s.OO:1 (H:V)Rigbt Side Slope. 2.OO:1 (rI:V)
uanningrs D...... 0.090cbannel slope.... 0.1300 ft/ft.. Deptb. 1.0o ft
conputed Results:Dl.scbarge 1l1 .31 cfsvelocity. 4.09 fPsFlow Area 3.50 sfFIow Top Wtdltb. . . z. oo ftWetted Perimeter. 7.34 ttCritical Depth... 1.01 ftcritical Elope... 0.1248 tt/ttFroude Nunber.... L.o2 (flow is Supercritical)
9pen Chanrel Flow l.todlule, Versio\ 9.42 (c) 1991Haestad l{etbodls, Inc. * 3Z Eroakside Rat 'r Waterbury, Ct OGZOS
ItLangrular CbanDel Aaalysls & DesigD
Ope! Channel - Uaiforu flow
Il9orlrBheet NarDes 9{525
cotr[euts ERAC! A-2 - SrALE BEIIIND.EOUAE
Sotve For Dl.scbarge
Given InBut Data:
,Lreft SLde 81ope.. 5.00!1 (H:V)Rtgbt slde slope. 2.oo!1 (Hsv)ltanningrs n...... 0.080cbaur€l gloPe.... 0.0800 ft/fxDsptb. t.Oo f,t
Couputed ResultssDl.soharge........ 11.23 afgVeloclty......... 3.21 fpsllott llrga....i,... :.sO s-fFlor .top fl.dtb. . . ?. Oo ftFettsd Perineter. 7.3{ ftcrltlcal DePtb... 0.91 ftcrlttoal slopc... 0.1289 fE/ftFrouale Nulber. . . . O.8o (ftow is subcrl.tical)
9pan Cba|rlrel Flow uodule, versioD 3.{2 (c) 1991Eaestaa lilethods, Inc. * 3? Broolcsl.de Rd-* Waterburyr Ct OG?08
71
nror,n IIA.LJ ? "r 199$
I\LU U rti i-: -'
PETER
'AMAR
ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLqNNING . DEVELOPI,IENT ANALYSIS . RESEARCH
MarchZ9,l993
Mr. Andy Knudtsen
Communi ty Development Department
Townof Vail
75 South Ftontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
DearAndy:
F,nclosed you will find the following submittal material for our amended minor suMivision and
special development district applications for the Crossview at Vail project:
1)
2)lgeryryEtcfEq'l hree complete sets of Plarns:. heliminary minor suMivision plat for Tract A
As you will see during your review of this material, we have addressed the vast m4iority of
concer.trs raised by the Staff and PEC. Issues where our proposal deliates l-rom what you have
rcquest'3d in previous correspondence include:
. 2O' side setbacks have been maintainexl for building envelopes on Tract A. You had
requested 15'.
. 1.5:1 regraded slope is proposed for a small portion of Tract A.
. Site plans of tracts A and B. Landscape plan for tract A. Tract B building floorplans and elevations
;.Grading and drainage plan for tract
13/Addendum to Geologic Hazard Report for Tract A4) A copf of the Tree l-ocate Survey for Tract B
Suite 204, Vail National Bank Building
108 South Fronlage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 . (303) 476-7154
ft) tne title of the plat has not been changed (as requested by Mike Brake). "CrtxsviewV at Vai!" will b'e used as a title br Traci B when a siirgle I'amily subdivision is
proposed.
f\(:) Garage locations and elevations on Tract A have not been identified.
Q L^gnuge on site clisturbance on'Iract A has been slightly modified lionr whai you
suggestecl in your January 20th tetter.
We appreciale your assistance over the past few months and look forward to working with you
and Kristan to discuss these outstanding issues and the overall review o[ this proposal. I am
confident that we can work these issues out prior to the PEC hearing. You had also requested a
cross-section of the Tract A drivewav and some tvoe of illustrative of how backine and turninecross-section of the Tract A driveway and some type of illustrative of how backing and turning
movements will be accomplished on A. I would like to discuss this with vou further and ifmovements will be accomplished on A. I would like to discuss this with you further and if
neqessary, provide this information in the coming week. Finally, Intermountain Engineering hasneqessary, provide this information in the coming week. Finally, Int
indicated that they will have Tracs A and B staked by Wedneday P.M.
As per our p,revious discussions, we anticipate this item will be scheduled for formal review by
the PEC on April 12th. Ptease do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
C",,.-\r\6r,\--
Thomas A. Braun , AICP
o
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL
Amended Application for a
Special Development District
and Minor Subdivision
hepared fon
Parkwood Realty, Inc.
529DTC Blvd, Suite500
Englewood, CO mlll
Prepaled by
Peter Jamar Associates, Inc.
108 South Frontage Road West, Suite 204
Vail, CO 816t
QAil 476-7rv
Nlarch,1992
I.INTRODUCTION
Special Development District and Minor SuMivision applications for Crossview at Vail were
submitted to the Town of Vail in December of 1992. On January I l, 1993, the Planning and
Environmental Commission held a work session to this application. In response to
Commissioner's comments made at this meeting and the staff memorandum, a number of
significant modifications have been made to the proposed development plan, The purpose of this
report is to summarize these modifications and the amended development plan.
A variety of comments were expressed by the PEC during the January l1 work session. Foremost
urmong these were @mments regarding the site plan for Tract B as they related to final grading and
the loss of mature trees. Following the PEC meeting in January, the applicant's commissioned a
tree locate survey of Tract B. This survey identified all conifers over twenty feet in height and all
aspen over I'caliper. The purpose of this survey was to provide an accurate basis for subsequent
revisions to ttre project site plan - the goal of which was to minimize the loss of matwe fees.
.In addition to the tree locate survey, site visits were conducted with the staff over the past two
months to discuss other site planning and development issues related to both Tracts A and B. The
following three sections of this memorandum describe all modifications that have been made to the
proposed development plan as t}tey relate to the entire project, Tract A and Tract B. In addition,
sections describing how this proposal deviates from the underlying zone district and a summary of
the project are also provided.
II. MODIFICATIONS TO THE OVERALL PROJECT
GRFA
The issue of how much GRFA is available for the remaining portion of the Valley Phase II has
been resolved. As summarized in Table #1, rhe remaining development potential for the project is
19,466 square feet and 15 dwelling units.
ORIGINAL EAGLE COUNTY APPROVAL
Dwelling Units- 26
F.xisting l-\evel ofment (Grouse Glen)
Dwelling Units- 6
GRFA-
GRFA-
329@
6,234
7,209
19,466
19,466
F.xi sting Development (Buffehr Creek Townhomes)
Dwelling Units- 5 GRFA-
GRFA.
GRFA-
Proposed flevelopment Plan
Dwelling Units- 9
Dwelling Units- 15
Crossview at Vail
In order to comply with the 19,66 square feet of GRFA that is remaining, modifications have
been made to the design o[ homes on Tract B and to the GRFA allocated to the two building sites
on Tract A. For example, in order to eliminate GRFA from Tract B, living space in units A, B and
C has been converted to crawl space. Revised floor plans have been submitted with the amended
application. Table {2 summarizes how GRFA will be allocated among Tracts A and B.
Preliminary Plat
A number of technical modifications requested by the Public Works Department and Planning Staff
have been made to the preliminary subdivision plat. Foremost among these changes are notations
indicating that Tracts A and B are affected by Medium Severity Rockfall and Medium Severity
Debris Flow (described below), changing a Utility Easement on Tract B to a Drainage and Utility
Easement, and shifting the location of building envelopes on Tract A (described below). Final
modifications to the plat will be made following review by the PEC and Town Council.
III. MODIFICATIONS TO TRACT A
Building Envelopes
In order to minimize site disturbance, the Staffl requested further modifications to the proposed
building envelopes. Proposed building envelopes have been reduced in size and shitied 20 feet to
the east. The size of the envelopes have been reduced by bringing the northerly line of both
envelopes l0 feet closer to the road. As proposed, envelopes are now only 50' deep. The total
square footage of both building envelopes represents only I4.37o of the total site area on Tract A.
Rockfall Hazard
At the request of the Staff, Nick t-ampiris has provided an update to his original Geo.hazard report
regarding the need for rockfall mitigation on Tract A. This report recommends one of two
mitigation alternatives. One aliemative is to scale or grout loose rocks directly above the building
envelopes. The other altemative is to design the homes so that "the rear foundation walls protrude
CROSSVIEW AT VAIL/GRFA BREAKDOWN
Tract A
l.ot A1
larA2
Tract B
Unit A
UnitB
UDit c
Unit D
UIIit E
UdtF
Unit G
Totals
Gross
GRT'A
3,477
3,r25
2,04r
2,O41
2,070
2373
1,898
2,382
2.O84
2t,491
225 sq.ft.
Deduction
-225
-255
_)) \
-225
-225
-225
-225
-225
-)t <
2,O25
Net
GR.F'A
3,252
2,900
1,816
1,816
1,845
2,18
r,613
2,t9
1 .R-54
19.M
Crossview at Vail
at least three feet above finished grade and to have no windows in this interval. This wall should
have a strength of af least 30O pounds per square foot".
It is proposed that these two alternatives be made a part of the SDD ordinance to ensure that
mitigation of this rocKall hazard is addressed during the design and construction of these homes,
Property Line/R.O.W. I)iscrepancy
This issue has been resolved on the plat by recognizing the R.O.W. line as the southerly property
line of Tract A. While this has reduced the land area of Tract A and reduced the distance between
the building envelopes and the front property line, proposed development still maintains a 20'
setback required by the RC zone district.
Fire Department Considerations
Three steps have been taken to comply with Fire Department access requirements. The driveway
has been increased to 16'in width (from the previously proposed 12"), units will be sprinkled,
and units will be equipped with an alarm system that is tied into the Fire Departments control
system.
Site Grading
The previously submitted site plan included portions of the site that were to be regraded at a 1.5:1
slope. 1.5:1 slopes are inconsistent with Design Guidelines that recommend regrading no steeper
Ihan2:|. Two changes have been prompted by widening the driveway to 16". First, retaining
walls are required in two locations along the driveway. Secondly, a small area directly in front of
the A-2 building envelope is proposed to be regraded at 1.5:1. 1.5: 1 regrading has been proposed
for two reasons. First, a 2:1 slope will require much greater site disturbance uphill from the
driveway. Secondly, the area where 1.5:1 slopes are proposed is located directly in front of the
building envelope for A-2. Given the fact that this area will undoubtedly be altered in order to
accomodate the development of this building site, this grading is essentially regarded as an interim
sl[uauon.
Driveway Design/Garage Elevation/Backing Area
Questions have been asked regarding how garages, driveways and turning movements will be
designed on A- I and A-2. These questions cannot be definitively addressed without designing
these units. However, certain assumptions can be made regarding these issues. First, the slab
elevation of the garages will be a function of the elevation of the driveway. Second, the garages
will have to be set back from the driveway far enough to provide for parking between the garage
door and the driveway. Finally, the driveway itself wiU provide a backup areafor A-2, and a short
extension of the driveway beyond the garage on A-l will provide a backup area for A-1.
In previous correspondencq Staff had requested that the location of the garage be designated on
each building envelope. In order to not encumber the design ofthese units, garage locations have
not been designated.
Site Disturbance
In order !o ensure that units on A-1 and A-2 are sensitively designed with the existing contours of
the site and to avoid excessive site grading and excavation, the following language is proposed for
inclusion on the suMivision plat:
Buildings on Tracts A-1 and A-2 should be "benched" into the hillside and step with the
natural contours of the site. Site excavation and grading should be no more than necessary
to accommodate the proposed development. Extensive site grading to create a flat building
site is not permitted. In order to ensure compliance with the above, finished grade on the
north, east and west elevation of buildings should not deviate more than 4 feet from
existing grade at any point.
III. MODIFICATIONS TO TRACT B
Revised Site Plan
Based on input received from the Staff and PEC, the two most significant issues on Tract B are the
loss of mature pine trees and fill necessary to construct the driveway. Under the previous
submittal, 19 mature pine trees would have been lost due to the location of buildings and regrading
for the driveway. By shifting units A, B and C to the north, and shifting unit D to the east, the
number of trees to be removed is reduced to 10. One implication of relocating these units is that
unit A now encroaches 10" into the required 20' setback. However, the benefits of saving frees far
outweighs any impact of this setback encroachment.
The location of the remaining three units have also been modified slightly.
Fiil
The highest point offill for the construction ofthe driveway has been reduced to 6-8 feet. A 2:1
slope is proposed at the end of the driveway, no retaining walls are necessary. As with the
previous submittal, the stand o[ mature pines located just beyond uruts D and E will be maintained.
Redesign of Buildings
With the exception of unit G, all units have been redesigned. Units D and E are totally redesigned.
The floor plans for units A, B and C have been moditied to convert basement level living space to
crawl space. In addifion to eliminating GRFA, this moditication reduces the need for excavation
during construction - thereby minimizing any potential construction impacts on existing trees
located uphill from these three units.
Drainage
A revised drainage plan has been prepared by Range West, Inc. This plan incorporates comments
from Greg Hall regarding off-site drainage that flows through Tract B.
Fire Department Considerations
As requested by the Fire Departrnent, a fire hydrant will be installed between units F and E
IV. PURPOSE FOR THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
A Special Development District has been proposed in order to allow for four exceptions to the
development standards outlined in the property's Residential Cluster underlying zoning. With the
exception of these four deviations, proposed development for Crossview at Vail meets or exceeds
all Residential Cluster zone district standards. The following two deviations have remained
unchanged from the original proposal:
Tract A
Allowable GRFA and dwelling units in the RC district are based on buildable site area.
Buildable site area discounts all portions of a site greater than 4OVo. The vast majority of
Tract A is over 4OVo slope, and as a result allowable development under RC zoning would
be limited to one dwelling unit. Development proposed for Tract A includes 2 units and
6,152 square feet of GRFA. By way of comparison, the County approved development
plan for Tract A includes five dwelling units and 6,764 square feet of GRFA.
Crossview at Vail
Tract R
In the RC district, buildings cannot be constructed on any portion of a site Ihalis over 4OVo
slope. The building envelopes on Tract A and two of the buildings proposed for Tract B
are located on slopes over 4%o. The two units on Tract B have been located on the hillside
in order to cluster development and minimize disruption of the meadow located in the
southwestern portion of the site. It should be noted that the County approved plan for
Tract B also included buildings on portions o[ the site that exceed 40Vo slope.
The two new deviations prompted by the redesign of Tracts A and B include:
Tracts B
As described above, units A, B and C have been shifted to the north in order to preserve
mature pine trees. In order to accomplish this, the footprint of unit A encroaches l0' into
the required 20' setback. In addition, an on-grade deck encroaches 7' into the required 10'
setback for decks. The encroachment into this setback is justified for two reasons. First,
the relocation of these three units reduces the number of lost pine trees from 19 to 10.
Secondly, due to the location of road pavement, there is an adequate separation of 30'
between the road and the buildine foundation.
TractA
In order to accomodat€ Fire Department access, driveway width has been increased from
12' Io 16'. This change has prompted the need for four foot high retaining walls on the
north and south side of the driveway. The retaining wall on the south side of the driveway
is located within the 20' setback and as such, exceeds the 3' limit for retaining walls in
front setbacks.
V. PROJECT SUMMARY
As outlined in this memorandum, numerous modifications have been made to the previously
submitted site plan. The majority of these modifications have been suggested by the staff, and are
intended to improve the overall development plan. Existing site conditions clearly present many
challenges to the development of Tracts A and B. With these modifications, it is the application's
contention that Crossview at Vail represents an efficient, workable and sensitive plan for the
development of this site.
The proposed development plan includes 2 units on Tract A and 7 units on Tract B. This
represents a 40Vo redwlion in density from the 15 dwelling units permitted by the development
plan previously approved by Eagle County and subsequently recognized by the Town of Vail.
GRFA proposed for Tract B is 4,923 square feet less than what could be developed under RC
zoning. Proposed dwelling units are 3 fewer than are permitted under RC zoning.
The development of single family homes on Tract B is consistent with the uses permitted in the
Residential Cluster zone district.
The two building envelopes on Tract A have been sited outside of a High Severity Debris Flow
Area that impacts the eastern portion of the site. This proposal replaces the five units approved
by Eagle County that are located in this hazard area.
Croesview at Vail
Units on tract B have been sited to minimize impacts on mature vegetation and the st€epest
portions of the site. In addition, the soutlemmosfportion of the site will be left undisturbed in
order to minimize visual impacts qr the Grouse Glen Condominiums.
The proposal is consistent with each of the design criteria outlined in the Special Development
Distict clnpter of the Vail Municipal Code.
The proposal will not have a negative impact upon the physical conditions of the site or the
Town in terms of geologic, hydrologic or other environmental conditions.
Crocsview at Vail
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0185 INGERSOLL I.ANE
stLT. coLoRADO 81652
(3@ 8?66100 e4 HouRs)
January ?t.' lFT$
$teven 6ensl er
Parkwnod Renlty
$199 DT0 SIvd, #50(l
Englewood.' SU BOlll
ftEr Tract A, Lir:n's Rldge $urbrJivigton
Dear Hr" Eensl er I
I have been asked to cLarify my porition on the rockfal. lmitigation I euggested in my previous letter. I believe that oneof two mi ti gati r:n techni qures i g i n erder.
One possibility isi to either:icale or qrout loo6e rocl::s in thelow r:utcrop directly abeve the eite:s; behter ig to construct therear {oundation wail. l o{ the bt.r:ildinqs to protrr-rde at least three
'f eet ahove .f inisherl Eracln and tn har.e no wi ndohle in this interval
( f rom Eround level to tlre lop o{. the sstern wall ) - This wallshould havel a atrength of at I engt 3r:rr:! pounde peF square f oot.Thi.* wal !. would aIso act to protect 'L.he hor'ne irr the r,nvelnt *inow
shor-rl d sl i de up F.['ni n$t the l,rcrnie.
I"F there arer 'f t-rrther que*t-inn* plelsse con{:act ine.
Ilcn grrl L:i n u lleol mq i sit
r e:1, !" ,
Ftr 1t7 - 93J7 aDqtcj FE*/4^/4€L
{ rv7gy n7.r, y' --?,.^,r."e e 11
5"ff t nto 4e5
hIIER - DEPARTIvIEI{TAL REVIEW
PR0fDT. cRossvtEw AT vAL - RcsnB. rz*6118 /tawsQefgq
o
DAIE SUBMITTED:
COIiIMENTS NEEf,TD
BRIEF DEg]RIPIION
B\':
DF THE PFffiSAI-:
FUBLIC r,tl3RKS
SUBDIVISICII'I PLAT
MII{E BRAKE Dote:JANUARY I5, 1g3JFeviewed b;r
Cc,mments
1. ]HE NTLE CIF IHE PLAT DOES NOT REFLECT WITH IUHAT IS DESCRIEEO AS THE
PLATNNG UNOTR NA.ME AND STYLE IN THE I'EDICATION. PLEASE CORRECT.
2. THE TOV,N ff VAIL, PUBLIC hIIRKS DEPARruEHT. WLL NOT ACCEPT THE PLAT
Ut'lTlL THE BOUNDARY PR0BLEM $,lTH TRACTS A.-1 Al{D A-2 ANCI LION'S RIDGE
R_O-W IS SETILED. WE BEUEVE IHAT IHE OVERLAP OF TRACT A C,NTO THE
R-0-W lS NOT VALID AND IHAT THE O\trRLAP BELONGS T0 IHE T0ltTN 0F VAIL.
J.
4.
IDENTIFY THE ADJACENT PROPIRNES AT IHE FOLLOWING
WEST OF TRACT A-1
NORTH OF IRACTS A-1 AND A-Z
EAST IF ]RACT B-2
C{I/E COMFI..ETE IES']RIFTION OF IIIHA.T MCNUMENT WAS
CORNER OF SECNI,N 12.
LOCATIO}IS:
F0uN0 AT THE N1/4
5. SHC'I'{ WHAT MONUMENT II,ILL BE SET AT THE FOLLO\4ING LOCATIONS:
PT OF CUFTVE 1
PC OF CUR\€ 4
6. THERE IS A MAJOR UI.It}ERGROUNO DRAII'{AGE PATH THRU ]RACT B. THIS
DRA,INAGE PA.TH WILL NEED T0 BE REL-D SUFTuEYEO AND LN ACCEPTABLE
DRAIhIAGE EASEMEHT ttr{tl- NEED TO BE SHOWN fi'{ 1Hl5 PLAT PRIOR T0
ACCEPTANCE.
I
4b':rlo28 Ll - lt ./ r-' /-r- "-l I
.TOHNNEITE FHILLIFS
County of
ot th.
02.t 1 a.t',"-' I o ^' 5);'
EE |}ourvrr 1LERK.
l-,L:; I Af ,:
COLARADO
t'tE(:
O"oo or
THIS D_EED, Mrdc rtrir
htwccn EnfER CITEU(
SPI'CIAL WAITRANTY DEBT)
dey of
I!hN|}6, ItD., A e[(nnDo IJMIUD
of thc .
, Strtc of Coloardo, trrnto(s), |nd
CROSSVIEW PROPEN'IIES, IJTD., A COLO&ADO LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
rhor lcad rddmr ir C,/O UIJTIMA HoLDINGS
4000 clmmLASD ptrRxlg\y, H.TILDnG 700, gIrIE c
A[L]\IV.[A, C.t\ 30339
County of ,St tc o( 9y'Fr$,8r.nrcc(r):
Wm{ESSETn, Th|t thc 3rmto(rr, lor rnd in conridcnrion of rhc rum ol..qI DCIIJUISI }[D OHER MD AN) 'AUN8IE CIEIDENATTCIBTTT
lhc ltccipl rnd ttrlficicm, of whlch is hcltby irtnrirlctlgcrl, ha g
bu3rin, rcll. convtT nnrl conlirm, unto thc gr rrcc(s), theif
.t9
PN{INMSMP
DOU,^RS.
grantcd, brrgaincd, sold rnd convcycd, ld bt ficrc prclcnb do e6 jn rt.
hcim and N.signs lonwr, rll thc cd pmprty, togcthcr with imFovcmn[,
crccutcrl lhis dccd oI lhc llilc sct fotlh xbow,
It mt, liturtc, lying rnrl bcing in thc
dcrcrikd u ftrllo*r:
Coun(y o[ EnGLg . St.tc of Colordor
A 1/10 UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN AND TO THE REAL PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT IIAII ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
al|o lmY|r by ttrr.l md ||umbcl lr:
tItGETl|En rih rll rnd rlnjulu thc hcrcrlitrnrcnts rlrl rppurtcnrnccr lhcrlo b€longlnl, or In rnywk rpgcnrlniq, rnl thc rcnloo rnrl
rctlnlonl. Ilmrinrlcr rnd rmrinrh]r, lcnts, is,!!$ nrd flofti thc]r{li rnd rll lllc Gstrtc, right. titlcr lntc|trt, chim rad dcmurl whrtmcvcr ol tho
tnntor{r), citlrr hr lrw r cquity, of, in and to thc rtnvc hargaincrl prcmiscs, nith tln hcrcditarmntr rrxl rpprrkornc$;
TO IIAVE ANlt 1() tl(rl,tt thc rnirl pnmiso abovc tnrgaincd nnd dcscribcd with llrc ilpurlcn.nco, unlo ftc lrrr cc(sl, IIIEIR lein rnd
mrignr furcvcr. Thc arnntrr(rl forIIEDl s; VIXI,hchs rnd Jrclsonal rl|E$cntalivcs oa tucc$roo, rlo[S cmnlnl rnd rglcc lhrl
Il{Et *hall rntl will WARI(AN'I' AND IUHUVIIR DEI;UND thorlxxc-[rugrincrl prcnriscs in thc quict rnd pxcrblc prrcs,rion o[tln 3nntcc(r),
nEIRhcirsrnr|as.rignr.rx'ninstrr||lnr|cwrypcrsonolJrrsonsc|nitltingthcw|rrr|corrn|ypn1lthcEo[.by.|hnN8hor[f|c.|c8'|n|o(l}
lN WITNIISS WllliRti(ll;. thc Xrrrl'r(rl h S
EEFEIT q|EEK'Iq tt}&s, ulD.,
A qI(X^r, LIMITE) F'\EItqtslUP
STAI0 OF COITORAt)O
)-'?.au ,lryof\*n.*-..U , D q:F
PARltut cr uITlflR cnE( KIINIIIS, I/rD., A CUrmEo LIMrllD prlRn@.sitllp
Wlnor nty lrlnd rnd of0cirl rcrl. '
lonRr
My commirsion crptar \\-),o-R\
tlf In Dcnwr, lnrrt 'City rnd."
No. ll.n r, 5, 6PtclAL WATIA TY DF,f,D F[rfmt rJrthhrnt. ! ! w. fih An., llrr,trd. co rcIa -(mt] t.afit
<'r to O1? t cl
ntt @
EXHIBIT NA'I
LEGIT DESCRIPTON
o o
PROPERTY DESCRIPTTON
That part of Tract B, "Phase II, Tract, A and Tract B", according tothe deecription on page B-1 of Exhibit B of the Pla4ned Unit
Development Plan and Declaration of Protective Covenantg recordedin Book 300 at Page 758 in the office of the Eag1e County,Colorado, Clerk and Recorder, described ae follows:
BegJ-nning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line of L,ion,sRidge Loop, according to the rnap of L,ion's Ridge Subdivision,Filing No. 2, recorded in the offiCe of, the Eagle County, Colorado,Clerk and Recorder, whence the nort,h L/4 corner of Section L2,
Townahip 5 South, Range 81 l{est of the Sixth Principal Meridian
beare N60'03'50'E L62.95 feet, eaid point of beginning also beingthe northeasterly corner of the Firet Supplemental Condoninium Map
For Grouse Glen At Vail Condominiums, recorded in the office of the
Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorderl thence, departing theeaeterly line of said First Supplemental Condoninium Map For GrouseGlen At VaiI Condorniniums, the foltowing 5 courses along theeoutherly and westerly said right-of-way lines: 1) 48.35 feet alongthe arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 541.29 feet, acentral angle of 05o07'04", and a chord that bears N85'46'11"848.33 feet; 2) N88'15'41"8 2.83 feet; 31 243.72 feet along the arcof a curve to the right, having a radius of 115.91 feet, a centralangle of 120'28'29", and a chord that bears 531'25'05"8 20L.24feet; 4) 528'48'10"!{ 188.56 feet; 5) 105.58 feet along the arc ofa curve to the left, having a radius of 198.70 feet, a centralangle of 30'44'00", and a chord that bears S13'26'10"W 105.31 feet;6) S01"55'50"E 114.12 feet to the northerly line of Tract A, Lion'a
Ridge Filing No. 3, according to the nap thereof recorded in theoffice of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorderl thence,along eaid northerly line, S84o55'16"W 98.42 feet to the easterlyline of part of Parcel A, said tion.s Ridge Subdivision, Filing No.21 thence, departing said northerly line and along said easterlyIine, N30'36'24"W 255.96 feet to the most eoutherly corner of
Grouee Glen At Vail Condorniniums, according to the condominium mapthereof recorded in the ofice of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerkand Recorderl Lhence, departing said easterly line of part of
Parcel A, the following 2 courses along the eoutheasterly lines ofsaid Grouee GIen At Vail Condominiums: 1) N33'47'21"8 230.65 feet;2) N00'06'35uW 2.32 feet to the moet southerly corner of eaid First
Supplemental Condominium llap For Grouse GIen At Vail Condominiuns;Thence, departing said southeasterly line, the following 4 courses
along the easterly lines of eaid First Supplemental Condominiurn MapFor Grouse Glen At VaiI Condominiums: 1,) N33"40'47"8 25.44 feet; 2)
N36'10'45"8 64.31 feet; 3) N06"53,20"W 41.50 feet; 4) N15'49,34"E31.08 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 2.43 acrea, moreor lese.
t.Datez t//7/92
Stan Hogf
Colorado P.L.S. 26598
o
C)
i.r
O
469O2a 8-572 F-gll 02/14/92 15:59 FG2OF2
.,
4t
. t-if6t*J
^rgvised 9/4/9L
DnB AppQcArroN - rowN'op vr\rr,, colEheoo
F/*t}J\':r i DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MBETING:
**********
TAIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
UNTII, TIJIJ REQUIRED INTORMATION IS SUBI'IITTED**********
T PRO,JECT INFORMATION:
r nr.. enD TDTTn\l.i
CDcll
cJ
Ho-rJ
-r
-rf I
^
Y Nuo, Constriction ($200.00)
foaoi.ion ($50.00)
D.
B. TYPE OF REVIEW:
ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LoI
Subdivfston --
Minor Alt.eration ($20.00)
Conceptual Review ($0)
BIock
a meets and bounds legal
on a separate sheet and
applicant, must
Lot, arga-:
If property is described bydescripEion, please provide
attach Lo this applicat,ion.
l1.
t.
G.
ZONING:
LOT ARDA: If required,
st,amped survey showing
NAME OF
Mailing
NAMB OF APPLICANT: ,
APPI,ICANT' S REPRESENTATIVB :
Addrebs:
Phond
I.NAME'OF OWNERS:
*srGN]\TURE (S) :
l: LIA
s 20.00
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200 .00
$400.00
$500.00
.t.
n.
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB EEBi DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe tlne of submittal of DRB application. Later, whenapplying for a building permiL, please ident,ify theaccurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of VailwilJ- adjust t,he fee according to the table belolt, toensure the correct fee is paid.
FEE PATD: $
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION$ 0 - $ 10,000$ 10,001 - $ 50,000
. $ 50r 001 - $ 1501 000
$150,001_ - $ 500,000
s500r 001 - $1r 000,000$ . Over $1r 000,000
:t DESIGN REVTEW BOARD APPRo\ZA:L EXPIRES oNE YEAR AFTER FINAI.
APPRo\rAr, uNLEss-A - Bur'LDrNc'PERMTT .rs . IssuED Al{D' coNsTRucTroN Is
STARTED.
**NO IIPPLICAIION WII,IJ BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OI'TNER' S SIGNATURE
1
Mailing Address:
F,tth
ffw-
7T
A pre-application meeting with a member of the planningstaff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additionalapplication informat.ion is needed. It is the applicant'sresponsibility to nake an appointment with the staff todetermine if there are additional submit.tal requirenents.
Please not,e. that a COMPLETE application will streamLine theapproval process for your project.
III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALt SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
A. In addition to meeting submit.tal requirements, theapplicant must. stake and tape the project sit.e toindicate property lines, building lines and buildingcorners. AII trees to be removed must be taped. Atlsite tapings and staking must be completed prior to the
DRB site visit. The applicant nust ensure that staking
done during the winter is not buried by snow.
B. The revieh, process for NEW BUILDINGS normally reguirestwo separate meetings of the Design Review Board: aconceptual approval and a final approval . Applicants
should plan on presenting their deveJ-opment proposal ata minimum of two neetings before obtaining final
approval .
C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Review
Board on their scheduled neeting date and who have not
asked in advance t.hat discussion on their item bepostponed, will have their items removed from the DRBdocket until such time as the item has beenrepublished.
D. The following items nay, at. the discretion of t,hezoning administrator, be approved by the CornrnunityDevelopment Department staff (i.e. a formal hearingbefore the DRB may not be required):
,. a. Windows, skylights and sirnilar exterior changeswhich do not alter the existing plane of thebuilding,' and
b. Building addition proposals not visible from anyother lot or public space. At the time such aproposal is submitted, appticants must includel.etters from adjacent. property owners and/or fromthe agent for or manager of any adjacent
condoninium association stating the associalion
approves of the addit.ion.
E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e,
snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow,wetland, etc) r a hazard study must. be submitted and the
owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazardreport prior. to the issuance of a buil-ding permit.
Applicants are encouraged to check with a lown plannerprior to DRB application t,o determine the relationshipof the property to all napped hazards.
F. For all resldentlal construction:
a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the insideface of the exterior structural walls of thebuilding,' andb. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a, four foot distance from the exterior face of thebuiJ.ding walls or supporting columns.
If..DRB -approves"'the..apph.cabion-.with -conditions ormodifications, all conditions of approval must beresolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit.
G.
IV.s!rcqsruqcF
A. Three copies of a recent otopoqraphic survev, stamped bva licensed survevor, at a scale of L" = 20' or largert
on which the following information is provided:
Lot area.
2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcel
consists of 6 acres or more, in which case, 5t
contour intervals rnay be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunkswith diameters of 4" or morer as measured from apoint one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural
features (large boulders, intermittent streams,
etc. ) .
5. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfal-I, etc.),centerline of stream or creek, required creek or
itream setback, 100-year flood plain and slopes of
40t or more, if applicable.
6. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmarkor seerer invert. This information should beclearly stated on the survey so that all
measurenents are based on the same starting point.
This is particularly important for height
measurements. See Poticy On Survey Information,for more information regarding surveys.
7. Locations of the following:a. Size and type of drainage culverEs, swales,etc. must be shovrn.
b. Exact. location of existing uLility sources
and proposed service lines from their source
to the structure. Utilities to include:
Cable TV
Telephone
Sewer
Water
GasElectric
B.
c. Show all utilit.y neter focations, including
any pedestaLs to be focated on site or in the
right-of-way adjacent t.o the site. Revocablepermits frorn the Town of VaiI are reguiredfor improvements in the right-of-way.
d. Property lines - distances and bearings and abasis of bearing must be shown.
e. AII easements (Title report nust. also include
exist.ing easement locations)
8. Existing and finished grades.
9. Provide spot elevations of the street, and a
minimum of one spot elevation on either side of
Lhe lot, 25 feet out from the side property ]ines.
Site Plan
1. Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spot
elevations must be shown.
A11 existing irnprovemenEs including structures,
landscaped areas, service areas, storage areas,
.. -,-. walks r.--dr5..veways7 ..-o Ff.'.st.reet"-parking 2 ^loadingareas, retaining waLls (wit.h top and bottom ofwall spot elevat.ions), and other existing site
improvements.
. These
elevations and grades must be provided in orderfor the staff to determine building height,. All
ridge Lines should be indicated on the site plan.
Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicated
on the site plan wit,h corresponding finished andexisting grade elevations.
4. Dr5-veway grades may not exceed Bt unless approved
by the Town Engj-neer.
Landscape Plan (1" = 20r or larger) - 3 copies required
1. The following information must, be provided on t.he
Iandscape pIan. The location of existing 4"
dianeter or larger trees, the location, sizer.
spacing and type (common and latin name) of all
existing and proposed plant nat,erial . All treesto be saved and to be removed must also beindicated. The plan must also differentiate
between existing and proposed vegetation.
2. Complet.e t.he attached landscape materials list.
3. The Iocation and type of existing and proposed
watering systems to be employed in caring for
pIant. material following its installation.
4. Existing and proposed cont.our lines.
In order to cl-arify the inter-relation of the various
development proposal components, please incorporate as
much of the above information as possible onto the siteplan.
Siqn off from each utilitv companv verifying thelocation of util"ity service and availability (see
attached) .
A preliminarv title report must accompany allsubmittals, to insure property ownership and locationof .aLL easenents on property.
Architecturat Plans (!/9tt = Lt or larger, L/4" Lspreferred scale for review) 3 copies required.
1. Scaled floor plans and all elevaLions of t,he
proposed development. Elevations must show bothexisting and finished grades.
2. One set of floor plans must be "red-Lined" to show
how the gross residential floor area (GRFA) was
calculated.
Reductions of all elevations and the site plan (8-
L/2" x 11rr) for inclusion in PEC and/or Town
Council memos may be requested.
4. Exterior surfacing materials and material colors
shal-l- be specified on the attached naterials list.
This materials l-ist must be completed and
submitted as a part of DRB application. Colorchlps, siding samples et,c., shoul.d be presented to
t.he Design Review Board meeting.
Zone check list (at.t.ached) must be compleLed.if projectis located within the SingJ-e-Farni1y, Primary,/Secondaryor Duplex zone disLricts.
Photos of the existing site and where applicable, of
ad jacent. strucLrlres. .
NOTE:
D.
E!
3.
H.
- r' 3ffi,"13:il:?,":til:i3::i;*{3:3H,C":equire rhe
specifications, samples and other maLerials (including
a model) if deemed necessary to deternine whether aproject, will comply with Design Guidelines.
V. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS.
Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopmentproposal and the locat,ion (site pl-an) of Lhe redeveloprnentproposal nay be submitted in lieu of the more fornal
requirements se! forth above, provided all irnportantspecifications for the proposal including colors andmaterials to be used are subrnitted.
VI. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A. Original floor plans with all specifications shoern.
Three sets of proposed fLoor plans l/$tt = lr or larger(l/4" = t' is preferred)
C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing and
proposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
D. Elevations of proposed addition.
E. Photos of t.he existing structure.
F. Specifications for alL materials and color samples onmaterial-s list (attached).
At the request of t,he Zoning Administrator you nay also berequired to submit:
G. A statement from each utilit.y verifying locat,ion ofservice and availability. See attached utilityIocation verification form.
H. A site improvement survey, stanped by registeredprofessional surveyor.
I. A preliminary title report,, to verify ownership ofproperty, which lists all easements.
VII. FINAL SITE PLAN
Once a building permit has been issued, and construction is
underway, and before the Building Department wilI schedule aframing inspection, two copies of an Improvement LocationCertificate survey (ILC) st,amped by a registeredprofessional engineer nust be subnitted. The followinginformation must be provided on t,he ILC:
Building location (s) with ties to property corners,i.e. distances and angles.
Building dinensions to the nearest tenth of a foot.
A]1 utitity service line as-builts, showing type ofnaterLal- used, and size and exact. location of lines
Dralnage as-builts.
Basis of bearing to tie to secLion corner.
A11 property pins are to be either found or set andstated on improvement survey.
AII easements.
Building floor elevations and all roof ridge elevat,ionswit.h existlng and proposed grades shown under the ridgeIines.
B.
A.
B.
c,
D.
VIII.CONCBPTUAL D
B.
Submittal requirements: The owner or authorized agentof, any project requiring design approval as prescribedby this chapter nay submit plans for conceptual reviewby the Design Review Board to the Depart.ment of
Conmunity Development. The conceptual review isintended to give t,he appJ-icant a basic understanding ofthe compat,ibilit.y of their proposal with the Town, sDesign GuideLines. This procedure is recommendedprinarily for applications more complex than single-family and two-farnily residences. However, developersof single-family and two-family projects shall not beexcluded fron the opportunity to request a conceptualdesign review. Complet,e applications must be submitted10 days prior Uo a scheduled DRB neet.ing.
The following information shall be submiEted for aconceptual review:
1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimumscale of one inch equals tlrenty feeti
2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior materials
and a- description of the chaiacter of the proposedst,ructure or structures,-
3. Sufficient, information to show the proposal
complies with the developnent standards of the
zone district in which the project is to belocated (i.e. GRFA, sit,e coverage calcul-ations,
number of parking spaces, etc.)t
4. Completed DRB application form.
Procedure: Upon receipt, of an appJ_ication forconceptual design review, Lhe Departnent of CommunityDevelopment shall review the subnitted naterials forgeneral conpliance with the appropriate requirements ofthe zoning code. If the proposal is in basic
compliance with the zoning code requirements, theproject shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptualreview. If the application is noL generally inconpliance with zoning code requirements, theapplication and subnittal nat.erials shall be returnedto the applicant with a written explanation as to whythe Community Development Departnent staff has foundthe project not to be in compliance with zoning coderequirements. Once a cornplete application has beenreceived, the DRB shall review the submitted conceptualreview application and supporting material in order t,odetermine whether or not, the project generally complieswith the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote onconceptual reviews. The property owner or hisrepresentative shall be present at the DRB hearing.
LIST OF MATERIALS
NAME OF PROJtrCT'-.
LEGAL DESCRIPfTON: I-,OT' BLOCK suBDrvr s r oN lgEvAlLb4j}l, tr:
STREET ADDSESS:_
DESCRIPIION OF PROJECT:
The following
Review Board
information isbefore a final a
subnittal to the Design
be given:
rectutrecr
roval-
for
can
A.BUILDING MATERIALS: ITTVPE OF MATBRIAL
Roof
Siding
Other Wa]1 Materials ---
-ra
-_f-FFascia '=i--.-i
Sof f it.s
EXISTING TREES
BE REMOVED
li::*;,.,* ,fu
B.
Doors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
, Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
-Phone:
PLANT }4ATERIALS:
I
PROPOSED TREES i-.
9 6l.lz.,tW&
a*,J W
N?(/1Indicdte caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for
deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferoustrees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 5 feet.
Ouantitv Size*
lZt- t4
, 4 bt.lzl
o
a)
BUILDING M
_Roof
siding
Other Wall
tw{4
Materials
-.,b#A:W 1Uq, f, e, AlrllrLY/VW+WaN@
w aaila/hYn!
"17
twLlav WV,
_pttww/*u#ev
'Fascia w.AwAe
. mtea /^Yn.*77 llx(tu,'v*w,v.
eze,/Fah-ea41)aa
t(sq3rtl eAilA
11,1Y. 7 Saal*|,4/A{ WWL - -
Soffits
v{indows
Window Trin
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
flues
Flashings
,Chimneys
Trash
Greenh
Other
Enclosures
ouses
)-A/AItMvtDW)Pt#lP
7A
dWr6\/V4.t&t*.l
o
Uilh
BUILDING MATtrRl}LS:
_Roof
siding
Other WaIl Materials
'Fascia
Sof f it,s
. Windows
Window Trim
Doors
- Door Trim
- Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashings
,Chinneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
-w+vy 1w( ?. 4. 4lr'14'.b / A?eq1W, Nffi
w;v{twft hadtwvY4.#apffi avaw1
:'APaN' FstAm/a'A Q n*t1.1 e+aFlel
'AAb/IMe.l/Wtw? u4+1
%,2ry2O/n ,(A /)?tJ6l
4+V'\AA
y'f^r4taarJq
,./w14&{ _
' rt1V,/ n*fa4 e)ffi*tkwaL
?e/v/ffi{4?Ft,a&w)
A.
M,#A,Hlthr,J+ra'
BUILDING }4ATERI4LS:
_!{oof
Sidins
OEher Walf Materials
'fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashings
,Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
, $,A4rUWl*frA4W)
- -lw,g-tuxrl:w 2 h,
^trl4WlwTHw
w.
WffiWa.y4.im\#f alz
/1, dw( 'v1a#FaHaw+re1
vp.ry/M*mafAffi
w'nYrLq/aa?a wlaaaarg'a^e/Me
t tr& w.1?H /flaav e 4uafu) a{l4t
t*1?P6t%l./Yw4+aAn&
1*-W.a*?/na.gA4tvr-l/
4tl,Ytrt/&#(
411 ftU' / |'W4'+ teJ. ?k@,!A):wawlrA
"_ab
7d
46A4.HlhtA4rrPr
BUILDING
Roof
I4ATBRI4LS:
SLding
Other WaIl Materials
Fascia
Sof f it,s
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashings
,Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
wffiItJa/il(A,#t7oWffiY
:@tuW/raAQwdrtAvdq
W1ffiAllrl
tt*p/MlTbvwtwD 2ffi
_ i1&fu,ffi4"tnxA+ad;Id
'le
BUIIDrNG I4ATBRI4LS:
_Roof
SLding
Other Wal] Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rail.s
FIues
Flashings
,Chimneys
Trash Dnclosures
Greenhouses
Other
- e%laI,b)tUmlll
. - -a44 fi)q. Y, h, 4+trJ^e/WAtttw ile
. 1vawY.W144 rev& 28fl,*?17 tJSTLlaiEB^rtn
!_aUplrA MWx/H^ytrA+
Ea.&&//M({A1? *v+1WD.
'eetuY@/Yu(A4nt%
i4.P,tgpq-Pg;
',1o?- fu6, ftttq /fr a.arl+ o 41Y/a
4fW-a,W.A'k@l aar%
q y6t gg,.m4/ n*1ael aqtW
7e
BUILDING
Roof
MATERT4LS:
SLding
Other
I'aScia
Soffits
windovrs
window Trim
Doors
WaI.I Mauefialg,
*w
Door Trim.. :
Hand or Deck-Fails-
Flues
Flashings
;ChImneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
trrL.ffiffi(
o
biltDttJq I
BUILD]NG !4ATBRIALS:
_Roof
Siding
other l{all Materials
Fascia
Sof f it,s
Windows
Window Trin
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or D-eck
FIues
Rails
Flashings
,ChimneYs
Trash Enclosures
. Greenbouses
-.OLher
.. . nz\ft tw(. n 1, 44r!4da/ 4+U**+@ Vwp
. 1*.m+ t*adwbfi.#Q2 ;1416*
z/ml*vavw vt*+T
lW/Yadrlteafiaa--
rqd+14t;14
?+t1n,/WV#EY
"dl
PLANT MATERIAO Botanical Name
PROPOSED SHRUBS
Ouantit,v Size*
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*fndicate size5 qallon.of proposed shrubs.
TVpe
Minimum size of shrubs is
Sguare Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
s0D
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR ME?HOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. TANDSCAPE TIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please
show the number of fixtures and locations on a separateIighting plan. Identify each fixture from the lighting planon the list, below and provide the h'atLage, height abovegrade and type of light proposed.
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (ret,aining walls, fences, swinmingpools, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwalls. Maxirnurn height of walls within Lhe front. setback is3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the propertyis 6 feet.
D.
SUBDIVISION-
JOB NAI,IE
LOT BLOCK FILING
ADDRBSS
The location and availabiLity of utilities, whether they be maintrunk lines or proposed J.ines, rnust be approved and verified bythe following utilities for the accompanying site plan.
Authorized Siqnature Date
U.S. West, Communicalions
L-800-922-t987
468-6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
949-5781
Gary HaIl
Holy Cross El-ectric
949-5892
Ted Husky/Michael
Heritage Cablevision
94 9-5530
Steve Hiatt
ASSoc.
Lavert.y
This form is to verifyIocation. This shouldpreparing your utilityinstalLat ions .
Upper Eagle Valley Water
& Sanitation District *
47 6-7 480
Fred HasLee
NOTE:service availability and
be used in conjunction withplan and scheduling
For any new construction proposal, the applicantmust provide a completed ut.ility verificaLionforn.
3. If a utility company has concerns with theproposed construction, the utility representativeshould not directly on the utility verificationforn that there is a problen which needs to beresolved. The issue should then be spelled out indetail in an attached let,ter to Lhe Town of Vail .
However, please keep in mind that it, is theresponsibifity of the utility company to resolveidentified problems.
4. If the utility verification form has signatures
from each of the utility cornpanies, and no
comments are made directly on the form, the lownwill presume that there are no problems and thatthe development can proceed.
5. These verifications do not relieve the contractorof his responsibility to obtain a st,reet, cuLpermit from the Town of Vail, Department of public
Works and to obtain utilitv locations beforediqqinq in any public right-of:way or easement in
t.he Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not astreet cut permit. A street cut permit must, beobt.ained separately.
* Please bring a site plan, floor plan, and eLevations whenobtaining Uppe.r.. 8agJ,e-Va.lley- Wat,e.r -&.,-SanitaGion-.s.ignaEures . Fireflow needs must, be addressed.
- DATE:b,lQ14*
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot
ADDRESS.:
OWNER
ARCHITECT
ZONE DISTRICT
Height
ToTaI GPfA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GREA
Setbacks
s
Proposed TotaI
?^l
Wt)42y1--++1+
Front,
Sides
Rear
Water Course Setback
Site Coverage
Landscaping
Retaining WalI Heights
Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
View Corridor Encroachment:
Environmental,/Hazards :
+ 425 )3b22-
20,
15t
15'
(30) (s0)...-qo7oytfu*t
4a33ZQ,F@a/oWtH6 6ba,F'_
3'/6'
:L a"qta,.()A fA
+425=
iE__
l-) Flood Plain
2) Percent Slope
3) Geologic Hazardsa) Snow Avalancheb) Rockfallc) Debris FIow4) Wetlands
Previous conditions of approval (check property file)
Does t,hls request involve a 250 Addition?
How much of the allowed 250 Addition is used with this request?
**Note: Under Sections lB.I2.090(B) and L8.l_3.080(B) of the Municipal
Code, lots zoned Two Family and Primary/Secondary which are less than
151000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. The
Community Development Department. nay grant an exception to thisrest.riction provided the applicant meets the criteria set forth under
Sect.ions LB,12.090(B) and 18.13.080(B) of the Municipal Code incLudingpermanently.restri.cting".Lhe" unit."as-.a-Jong-Lerm...rental -unit for ful1-
t,ime employees of the Upper Eagle Valley.
O *,*'ffi'rr*.rro
BIock
PROPOSED USE 4 +IF{ELE F?,\MIbf
**LOT STZE Z,AIP- 1Ml
Allowed
{3+}l(33)l+++
w@
PHONE
Exi st inq
o
AJp*ff
(300) (500) (900) (1.200)_
by Town Engineer:
No ???
Permitted Slope 8& Actual Slope &
Date approved
Yes
r.0
I DUgiSilfHffIiiFOU
Category Numbef o^t" 7/,1/7y'
/-\ProieclName: L rt-t t Ur( tJ.
Building Name:
Owner. Address and Phone:
Project Street Address:
Comments:
2 3u tj, /.. \y'ad d/c/l_ (l
Legal Description: Lot5- Block- Subdivision fr .. <s r'' a.J Zone Distrfct S, )) 7'2 k
/4Jo ,!3,,'//.r ar-./ l'-/
c*v,
f,r.2,'t t . na pl_zo,t-
L,/
Motion by:
----.---\
'/t'\Board lStatt Action
\.=--------l
Vote:
N r/- -..^
f ft c€,-C>ttu,ao,.
III '2 fl tnr leJ. /),'-" r-r'-, 'Ac 2''\('.
/'Y l ,\ 24.
1 ,,.,,/ / /4 /l/{-*tr, y' /ti"^.
Town Planner
tll
ox", 7/ l/ /4 DRB Fee Pre-paid
VAII. STGN COT,P.
o
\-'#
gl
4*4
"r41"- ,^4 l"-"t*r- t -{ry*
e+-L 4tuQ-
1 sz .{o '2^ '
I
cRossvI
Etll
A
60 l/tur- b ,.-4/t/(
U'tt;el* 2 '?t/u
4r4L (f t- - 'ro)
@r74i&t -
)
i
hL^I'. li Li ld{ r
()
\ _-/
TL. RitIt P..?1..
Ilng&. rfihk
SOTHEBYS
INTENATIONAI IEALTY
.-n
Q, ctzeo UAv'
C- LrE Rturr
BRoxlR AssoctATE
230 BRTDGE STREET
VArL, CoLoMDo 81657
(3O3) 476-242r
FAx: (3O3) 476-2658
DENvEx.: (303) 893-8542
cn0ssy/Ery afuen
Buffchr Creek Road
(((
I'l
Buffehr Crcek :
Townhomes /,
ff
Thc Vallcy Condos
'i,
/,
'l
/::,
@--
Slifer, Smith
Bridge
& Frampton,
Street Office
303-476-242rC. I,ee Rimel
Inc.
FIL T COPY
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
July 22,1994
Departrnent of Comntunity Deve loprnent
Mr. Randy Hodges
JR Architects, Inc.
P.O. Box 1297
Dillon. CO 80435
Dear Randy:
Below is a summary of the issues raised at the Design Review Board (DRB) meeting held on
Wednesday, July 20, 1994. The issues raised by the DRB members should be addressed by
yourself or Steve Gensler at the time of final review.
DRB COMMENTS/ISSUES
From the building elevations proposed, it appears that all of the
buildings are the same and lack panache. The units make no real
statement in terms of architecture or future marketing ability. Therefore,
please consider adding a somewhat more elegant look which may be
accomplished through the use of more architecturaldetail.
The horizontal siding on each of the units is too predominant. To
conect this, use more of a variety of materials and add more
archileclural detail to the elevations.
The continuity between the units that has been proposed may be
acceptable provided it does not create a monopoly house look. Please
attempt to create more of a community feel amongst these units through
the creative use of stone or other exterior buibing materials to connect
and blend each of the units together.
Maintain the high architectural quality that currently exists in the
neighborhood. This can be accomplished by simply refining your
proposed architecture slightly and adding some simple cosmetic fealures
to each of the units.
Several of the building elevations as proposed illustrate somewhat large
interrupted blank wall spaces. To eliminate this rather dull elevation,
please consider adding some detail to help interrupt the blank walls.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Mr. Hodges
July 22,1994
Page Two
6. Please bring building material samples to the meeting at the lime of final
review.
7. Greater proof is required of those lrees which you have indicated will be
preserved through the construction process. Please submit
documentation which verifies your ability to preserve lhe trees which you
have indicated can be preserved.
8. A shake roof or a roofing malerial that imitates a shake roof should be
considered for this proiect.
I hope the comments and issues addressed in this letter will be helpful in providing you with
the necessary information needed to finalize your project for DRB review. Should you have
any questions or concerns regarding the comments and issues addre'ssed in this letter, as
always, please feel free to contact myself or Andy Knudtsen during regular office hours.
Sincerely,
Hm*ft&*&",-'
Town Planner
1zr'\t\'\'
\
DATE SUBMITTED:
REG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
INTER.DEPARTM ENTAL REVIEW
asj
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
> aD.
Date:
Landsiaping:
Reviewed by:Date:
Comments:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:Date: 1'U-1 7,,.,rr)
Comments: Ded,-r*t)
Trurat 5;Pccffrc5
'. rf. f.r-f fla.."r,
HVxrlr.,-L..,4.;"J/Dryh.
', r-1 * *kn )t"-t
loel& o( go<,J <n), si?f,.
?; ., v - /( <flt
\/(t.€ [c.--.< Y 3&""en
rr ^t\ ,1 {\
Slar-)-*S t t''
,
Sarvl<-1': lrYdrn"*.\-
COMMENTS NEEDED ev: ?,1!
BRIEF
7 f :Ah y'.,*.;| A-ri,c.f
6t/. ,4; Aa-a ,Lr4rr 4e,.4 .^ r -
Enerinerarinn. -G-l.. ^.-: t ?-a,a, - /tr ) - - a
g" tlff-
H,Engineering:Ech eo \tAAt qr4 rotJ
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Distributed to the Fire Department, pubric works, and Landscaping o4
TO: MIKE McGEE GREG HALL TODD OPPENHEIMER
Retum to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
INTER.D EPARTMENTAL REVIEW
a3a
DATE SUBMITTED:DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Fire Dept.:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Distributed to the Fire Department, Pubtic Works, and Landscaping on
COMMENTS NEEDED av: ?,1!
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:7 A,b ";trh ftr..;7 lrcu,--t -.,-
Stft /7^ iaa 4^4'1414 et+7r*1
Ensineering: Eoh eo \tAO -fV rttt*l
Date:
Date:
Date:
\
MIKE McGE ODD OPPENHEIMER
Return to Andv Knudtsen
Town Planner
o5^s;
DATE SUBMITTED:DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
7 A,fr. li.71& {.t ^;1 It tr,--t - .>
tvf- fl-X I o.a t+rn?l l-'.^ .- t
Engineering: Srh er gAAl ry?4 r.ttJ
o'a e*5y'
Re\riewed Uy: orcqST$i Date: TfbfqS.
Gommenb:.
Orol*,y 5tud.l \s'{lba re.tie.e,rd fcr rOe11p6.1 c[ ar.Nv{\t e}c .
g^o..it ktacav'ry !sl<l"\o be doOrcrrcci
COMMENTS NEEDED av: ?,1!
Landscaping:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Fire DepL:
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date:
Date:
GREG HALL
Distribuled to lhe Fire Department, public works, and Landscaping on
DRB AP ION - to9n['ot' v]\IL,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
**********
T TS APPLICATION IIILI.| NOT BE ACCEPIEDI'NTII AI.L REQUIRED INFORMAIION IS SUBMITTED**********r.PROJECT INFORMATTON:
A. DESCRIPTION-:
o
PLTCAT
jevised 9lalgt
cotoRADo
R[C'0JUN tJt994
B. TYPE OF REVIBW:\-rX New Constrrjct,ion ($200.00)T-...Addirion ($50.00)
ADDRESS:
TEGAL DESCRfPTION: Lot
LOT AREjA: If required,
st,amped survey showing
Minor Alteration ($2o. oo)
Conceptual Review ($0)
BIock
applicant provide a currentIot arsa.
c.
D.
Subdiv
I-f property is described by a heets and bounds 1egatdesgription, please provide on a separate sheet anaattach to this application.
fJ.
F.
G.NAME OF APPL
NAI,IE OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE-I'Mailing eddiess:_
I.NAI,IE_OF OWNERS:
*SIGNATURE (S) :Mailinq AddresEl
- Eeli-d . c.
Condominlum Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB feelfees, as shown above, are Lo be paid at
ensure the correct fee is paid.
,lFk
.t.
K.
fiw-
4
the tlme of submitLal of DRB appJ.ication. Liter, whenapplying for a building permitl-please identify tireaccuqate valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vailwill adJust t.he fee according- t,o the table Uefow, to
FEE SCHEDUTE:
VALUATION$ 0-$ 101000
$101001 -s 50,000.$50,001 -$ 1501000
$150,001" - $ 500,000
$500,00r - $1r 000,000I . Over $1,0OO,0O0
!'t,rFEE
$ 20.00
$ 50.00
$L00.00
$200.00
$400.00
$500.00
g,
.* DESIGN REVIE}I BOARD APPRO\I}E EXPTRES ONE YEAR AI'TER TINALAPPRO\TAI. IINI,ESS*A IBUILDrNG'PERMIT'rS " ISST'ED A}ID " CONSTRSCTTON I SSIARTED.
!t*No APPrrrcATroN wrLr. BE PRocEssED lfrrHour owNER, s srcNAruRE
-.'.-
must
Mailing Address:
I LTST OF MATERIALS
-
NAl,lE OF P
LEGAI, DESCRIPTTONI
STREET ADDRESSI_
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
SUBDIVISION
The following infornation is
Review Board before a final required for submit,tal
can be given:
to the Design
A. BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
soffits
9Iindows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Fl.ashings
. Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Otber
B.LANDSCAPING: Name of
PLANT MATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
TYPE OF MATERIAL,t
EXISTING
BE
TREES
REMOVED
TO
:n2d sp
aot tTt/lIndicdte caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper fordeciduous.trees is 2 inches. rndicate h@trees. Minimum heiqht. fqr coniferous trees is 6 feet.
Ouantitv Size*
lp lzt- td
' 4 lrrl-l4l9 ^*.ulet-.d
?r
Lb!=Z,Llu'
Designer:'Phone:
PLANT MATERIATO Botanical- Nane
PROPOSED SHRUBS
Ouantitv Size*
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
*Indicate size5 qallon.
GROUND COVERS
of proposed shrubs.
Tvpe
Minirnum size of shrubs is
Square Footaqe
SOD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c- LAIIDSCAPE LTGHTTNG: rf exterior righting is proposed, preaseshow the number of fixtures and locations on- a separatelighLing.pla-n.- Ident,ify each fixture from the li;hting planon the list'below and provide the wattage, treight-abov6 -
grade and type of ligtrt proposed.
OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimmingpools, etc.) Please specify. Tndicate height,s of'retainin!walls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback i63 feet. Maximum height of wa]ls elsewhere on the propertyis 6 feet.
D.
te,rry r.ocarrolo v*trrcorroO
SUBDIVISI
.tOB NAIVIE
LOT BLOCK FITING
ADDRESS
The locat.ion and availabirity of utilities, whether they be maint5un\ lp"9 or proposed lines, must be approved and verified bythe following utilities for the accompanying site plan.
Authorized Siqnature Date
U.S. West, Conmunications
1-8 0 0- 922-19I7
468-6860 or 949-4530
Public Service Conpany
949-5781
Gary Hall
Holy Cross Elect.ric
94 9-5I92
Ted Husky/Michael
Heritage Cablevision
94 9-5530
Steve Hiatt
Assoc.
Laverty
Upper Eagle Valley Water
& Sanitat,ion District *
47 6-7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE: 1.This form is to verify service availability andIocation. This should be used in conjunction withpreparing your utility plan and schedufinginstallations.
For any nelv construction proposal, the appticantmust provide a complet,ed utility verificltionform,
If a utility company has concerns wit,h theproposed construction, the utitity representativeshould not directJ.y on the utility veiiticationform that there is a problem which needs to beresolved. The issue should then be spelled out indetail in an attached letter to the Tbwn of Vail.However, please keep in nind that it is theresponsibility of the utilit,y company to resolveident,ified problems.
If the utiLity verification forn has signaturesfrom each of the utility companies, and no
comments are made directly on the form, the Townwill presume t,hat, there are no problemi and thatthe development can proceed.
These verifications do not relieve the contractorof his responsibility to obtain a street cutpermit, from the Town of VaJ.l, Department of publiclYgrtg and to obtain utilitv locations beforedlcrqinq in any public right-of:way or easement inthe Town of VaiI. A buiLdinq permit is not aslregt cut pennit. A street cut permiL must Ueobtained separately.
*- PLease bring a site plan, fLoor plan, and elevations whenobtaining uppe,r'. .EagJ,e*.va,J.rey*water .&--sanitaGion--signaEures . Fireflow needs must be addressed.
2.
3.
4.
5.
O *, *'ffi" "rrr*r.rrO
--DATE: b'l/,at*
Height
ToTaI GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LoT BIocK
ADDRQSS,:
OWNER
ARCHITECT
**LOT SIZE
FiItng fr
zoNE Drsrxtct t><toa-Itta- atae
PROPoSED uSe -t aFJaUA FrVrU-(
Al-lowed
{."El.
l?olL
20,
15'
15'
Proposed
ft
I"IF1
TotaI
425 =
425 =
Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course Setback
Site Coverage
Landscaping
Retaining WaIl HeighLs
Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
s0);1<fit
wq
PHONE
Existinq
(30)
Qa"q'd/()rJ f'f 4/o*rt
(300) (600) (900) (1200)_
Permitted Slope -.!! Actual Slope &
View Corridor Encroachment:
Envi ronmental /Hazards :
Date approved by Town Engineer:
Yes- No ???
1) Flood Plain
2') Percent Slope
3) Geologic Hazardsa) Snow Avalancheb) Rockfallc) Debris FLow4) wetlands
Previous conditions of approval (check property file)
Does this request involve a 250 Addition?How muctr of the arrowed 250 Addition is useffi-:EEis request,?
**Note: under sections 18.12.090(B) and 18.13.090(B) of the MunicipalCode, lots zoned Two Family and primary,/Secondary which are less tlran15r000.s9. ft. in area may not constrult a second dwetJ.ing unit. Thecommunity Development Department may grant, an exception t6 t.hisrestriction provided the applicant meets the criteiia set, forth undersections 18.12 .090 (B) ano 18.13.080 (B) of rhe Municipat code incrudingpermanently -,restrictj.ng. Lhe- unit,."as*.a-rong-Lerm._rentit -unit for full--time ernployees of the Upper Eagle Valtey.
3'/6'
10
TOWN OFVAIL R.ECEIPT NO.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTIY DEVEI-OPI'ENT
CHECXS MADE PAYABLE TO TOWN OF VAIL
-01 000041540 $s.m
01 0000 4241s UNIFORM BUILDING CODE s50.m
-01 0000 42415 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE s36.00
-dTm00z24l5-l UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE $32.m
j-Tlmm?24fl UNIFORM FIRECODE s36.m
01 0fi}0 42415 |
s30.00
--0IAooo=D4151 OTHER CODE BOOKS
-Tl-m4l.s-t548-l ffi $7.00
01 ffYn42412 |XEROXCOPIES $0.25-atffi7J;f:-j STUDIES
01000042412 IffiR{M $5.00-Tlm?z37al TENEIT-EESr'RE-INSPECTIONSj-Olm-4l33tl--fiffingl,-OHF HOTRS I NS P E gT] ON FEES-T-r troo qt+t2-coN'Mcrons ttcENSES FEES
-oro000-4i4-tj-STcNAFPLIcATIoN FEE s20.00
6iT000n4rt-A'DTFI-NALSIGNAGE FEE I$ I.OO PER SQ.FT.
01 0000 4 VTCARTPRoiEcrD-ciFATIoN xn 3r)
-oTddm337r-INVESTTGAT]ON FEE (BUILDING)3Tm?ilr ffi--flffimT-TOV-IIEWSPFtrRDISPE-SERFUIID--T'IIomZilIt TAXABLE @ 4% (STATE).mmm7l0i0-EAJWItr @ 44 (rowN)
01 0000 42371 iEUILDITG I NVESTI GATI ON
OTHER
0l 0000 41330 AI $200.w
0t 0000 41330 ffi :iZ(xJ.UU
01 0000 41330 EXE-I oR ALJERATIoN ILESS THAN I OO SQ.FT]SZ(ru.(J(,
01 0000 41330 ffiINMORETHAN IOOSA.FLJ $500.00
01 0000 41330 $1.500.u)
01 0000 41330 li\dAJOR AMEND $1.000.00
01 0000 41330 SPECIEDEVELOPI\4ENT DISTRICT IMINOR AMEND $200.00
0l 0m0 41330 SUBDIVISION
01 00m 41330 VARIANCE $250.(J(,
01 0000 41330 $250.00
01 0000 41330 RE _ ZONING $200.00
OTHER
OTHER llurAL: Duv .
COMMENTS:
trtnt -/;721q '/\z/
Mo.# L-1 cr*r / .l-X/ oerfl111!-/rJ / REC'""V-
t [ - I | -- .', ,,',,, ' ''..'.* r. *,o,,",,'"','""--"" o,-,-t
)
Q{-
TElr|H (]F IJFI I I*
Ili scel laneor;s Ceh
Er6-14-94 1i:59:41
FleceiPt * 15885i
Ftccc,unt* fH*1F81
GEHSLEE\.PREPn16 TIRB
tlmsun? tendered ]'
Item Paid
5Sg. E6
Bsount Paid
g16EES41331E|6E 5E|F.6S
f,hange rPturnBd } t:1' Etl
THFIhII{ I/EIJ
r/':u r cgshier HEI $I
- tr Trr rltt
,ri{N9 t8?94
r(r..'+
Pemit ttrmberg
NEItr-
4=e
. t_E_vEJ-b1t t'-c
IL2-
T1lr\
\
'1
lL 3"
lLa't
4/p-t >.. b"
U/t <4€-// | /Z:l
\/\/A-HE^R€>
/b><lo/ tr2'.ry1
(a ><. R,=>,
=>uf;aolc.l.q-
(BE-yoND)
b><lO
F-=>, FF-l
Qty-bar lto
?
7',
TYI"ICN L TXTF_RIOF.\A/N[-L- CONST\UCT IOI1
rJo, 'F'' fiaa>'"at\
-flCr\L- lNiaF=lO\\ ./n.U- CON T\UCTION
l><a E-.DAF* i,...-AP€>1 r31 1-16t \ /tTtl b"?x@J =r- /+r-( N f i FJ I c- +T trc-c-o
( srszr-e- F-oc-F* F=> f\roTE-D ),/ r : V*,t;2" :,x7la..F E-3-r=,O,a. a-Drz Z><- a 4-T -) ft,AJ. I A'O,c--./ R' lol D^f f tF\E>LJrrAT lot</
1z i?Q-,. r*+-i \,//+FOc.- =),<l\fuQ\.=. 4,///7'' 9't^ --f'\A/r.-'-r-'
v -'Crl-lJ
-- -l4t\..4
'rrFl
J PPF-T.
-EVE!J-5a6\'4;'
3:<3
il{Tl\-Y
-e_vE))?-1t tra4:
<lvE+-
SOC-F;
--C,'\.^,/E-F.-
-*Y?*@.o:'
dtfl*
I
I
-F-
li
-]1-l
I
J
-+
I
+i--J-_-
-fiO.F.
Ik=l
Y
o
'?/e! e-o>< ?L-1woae
,., :O\./E Fr, Zx-Z.3Lf F FE-Re..iT lat'&. oyE-Jc..':Ve"c-e> ?t-aw€lo
' ZxZ€rl-E-EfF-l€,'AT la"o'e-;TYf '
I lZ"Mrr.'t, c-oNT,I AIA€FAC.F.| FFT\,\/EFJ{\,zALle-c'YA.r!.E) 2t124To-\t'F lT
-Tr-Ir
; PLn^looo}<z-r4', lb"oc-,,
J \,/E-F\,T
- l2<G
-C-E PAj\ F/.\€C|,A
PLocl<lNcl
?11lZ'c-EtlAR. TF{P1
:'z/d' Re, c-FgAl\Pr-y\,.\/oor>€rofFl].
fasona dtl,
+/d C,ox Fl-Y\,voopo\'/ER z><2 bt$?*a'?.\T 16'o;c-, ovEJ\'Yd'c-ox P;Y\A/ooo
Zxl=
F,ATTF-R.
3r,oc-FJt\cl
,z*bC-F'-,AR F|=e-uz. -G
c:oNr, €c-RELJ\l \=vEr.rf \ry/z* pr-oc-F-JNg
Z>.lZcF-o,,\R. Tl\ly?e)'*,.+, CE-DAJ\-Pl-]/vvo-F%77t7
fascna @1t[,
'.2><lz l-ooKoure,AT'Z4''O,C-, I
=r1,, =
='4''4,:*?F
PE..C++|F-lC-1
='Cit-t-) L-Al-1EHl .^
-d:- PbAr{
P--r | ,. \.-:r-r..-'- | ti-/t--r // i i-i-*-, Y ,,Jt-- ri--\r, i-\r I\'//E-FJT|L?,\TIO|\' FF.OFa E .\\./E- \,/F]$.JT fO
FiDc?L\./E-r\ry ) / \/ i=q Li F F F\' V/A\FOF-_EA,FFI *./-= =o-
\
---+
- - ---f
--i
I-+-__1__rtJ,-
>( lo€r t-\Fr.4
-,b><. F+,_-LJrFOFfa \4><1 *8.:U-FoFT:
t,i*
o:E!!ryl=F<
t
Ir
I
i4 ><
b><4
. \-#-,
Jlll
U[.]s $ft-rr_r$rr-)
C-.F fr^.F-TruY, T\l:\/lF.,..lt)O\^
=,f pfi-*-
:i_LyL@
FJ-l-rF-f' (-E-!'E-L:
-@yt'
6><8
F.l\,/F-rq.F.Oc-F,-
L--CF\,VE-.R-t#,/a-
Erc4joil i
I
I
.'ZxZ €rl-E-EfF-t\e'ucrT latto,e-;Ty?,
lZ" t-rTtN, c-oNT,
7\lF.Ie'PA,C-E-'FEjT\,\,/E_.E.|\I
vALr--f
za.Nra Zr.Z.+
To-\zEt!T
P>< le' -l\/\1+'t)
l?'<z/a\T le'"c)4"
(-_C-E.DAI\ F/AEC-|/A.
-+€et<..tNc?
Z^lz'C-E-E:AJ\ TF.|I*'1
---e/d' Re, eF r-r^\l\Puvr.rzooe€'oFrrT'
ft/d c.Dx PL\rvvoop.OVE R. Z ><Z €>l--E-E-PE-Ret:AT ldto;c-, ovEl\'Yd'eo.x FuY\A/ooD
l.E.Fr \/'PJIT Zxlz11ArTa&=
5r-oc.l<.tr{c]1
,zxbc-Etr)^l\ r^ec-r,AcoNr, €'C-RE-E^Jrze+r l- rNh. x 3
I
vE F,.rr w/?/ ar-oc-F.lNq(- z-t2CE.OA.R TRTP1+E *=' eE-DA.F\PL\ryvooD-Bopprl
'I
+/d co>< PL-1wooQ.o\./E R. Z><Z 3t-F F FE-Re?\T la"&-, OVaF.--t//:I eO)< p,_aW@O
!Z:t<lZ. LOOl<OUreV7.Zqt'O,f_. ,
fascna dfl,A
I
It_>ry-
t-+-fONra
I l-F-DCa+R
O'
--Z*.'.
€E-c-1'<-15160
r\J=>tJ l-/r\:f I O t\J /
1 :2.7: 12e a{\,lzra.r-l-
:r,zE-A!-U@
lerH )
lz
.3T-OFjF_t b -'r-e-l-v/|,'<'E+-
c-'VW,
14'ul {j6}dujri
--C.qt-LJ t-,+.f,.'1---F-.1
-l :<_:=-oF.=E-l-
.:--A:<.A
-. Lpt-.-:-L2\<4W-a- (zrori+u).*.-c-oTJ|{JTE o+
-cTLl 6
Irl
box 1
drllon
8043
303.13.468.{
:.-c-otJt\rTElk
- e-tNtKr ze'
:.TRJIV1 ,AT_--ara311E_F..e
I*lf-
r
I
I
e=qa'-b"
+.
-+
. +/d cp)< pL-r\^/oop
-. ro\./Ele. Z--?- €rt-F F FEJ\€I7 .ZxZ.€r-LEfp-R€/\T l@'o,e;T-(?'
/, lz"l-1tv, c-oNT,,I AIREPAC.E-I :Fr-T\^,/ErJ\.,,
\/ALT-EjY/^\tlJ9?r.Zct-
<'lot--rtxzooo
=r<'Z /\T lA"Oa-..
Nt vFJ{r
/4T ld:^tt(-- . OyEA.' V/t'c-o> puyvv@o
{')(
l
r ',2*A
- C-ED,AI\ fA€'clA.
tLoc-K.lNc?
Z*lZ'oEDAR TRil*1
;= z/d' R€t, eE-gA.t\Puvr,rzooe
=oFrrT.
Br-OCr<lNG
=Z'><lZ LOOKOLJT.€t
/A'T'2,1,'OE-, I
fasona dtil,A
+B c,r,x FL-Y\,\/oopO\/E.l< Z >+? AL#-E-P E{qe>.N ld',o,c-., o:zs^','zz|" eor< Pr-Y\/\/ooD
Z r< l=|\.AfTER€
?xa niC-=.-)AR -Ae'c-iA *\_
coNlr, ff-RE.F-r! \=\,/E^tf wv/z>. pttg5-F<JNq
zxlzc-F-oAR TF.jY7lg *+, C.E-DA,I\Pr-'Y\.voop-rcFFtTrtl
fascna @Itil"
-l
I
I++
1_-
_TRJM,ATrC-OF\l\.JE-F.et
L A-;Po'r'\l 6+ca'3Q2)'
I
./
\/E-At-L)rcletH )
-t?
0lrL_
-f\
U
-ir
dt[,
12'or>,-7p,/-+21?E_Fl' TIDF-ax? aFrT-l+Al|-€
pEzl+1FtCl
l5.a'--, ^' ,- ---Y-T
--T
f let_qryfrt\-€=LJu,,'+ir-o1-.rfSzr==qu:FJr.zAnon-BaF{q{ E-r1_ /'{2" D|<-r\,\'ZA\L.+_
r'F' rh rga;a=xgi'l
lLf,tlJ-itt,f"=i!al, ,
SIMFE|3N
=lZlj"
-_*'tg>14'iclLul l<\lY FY
I
T.rFtc.Ar-. FJ<C.F-PT ,Ae |\OTE-D
I)oD
SPA\f-l RATINCt')
c dt[,G@[, G
r;i
I
o
C4LUryl
Fr'.-1
C.'TT
6xb
,F\t\,/FJq\
Li.trl
box 12W
dlllon.cohEbzcS-'-
i303.468.5
_l
lFOC-|<-
+/d l:-o>< Pr-vrazooe
, .Z s.Z. €r-E-Ef LtCelb"o.e,-T-(f '
lz"MtN, C-ONT,AIR€PAC-F.+T\,,l,/ErE-f..l\,/ts\,lLt_\r
/ ^\NJE, ZtlZ+
TO \zF.r{T
>< Pl-=nxrctoc)z-><z,AT lb"oa-,.
o\./E-'.R. Z- ><-2. €L-F.-Ef Ei-R€,AT le)t'6-. OVe-R.t/2t'CO>< ?t-a'w@o
{l -OEDAF\ r,A€C-t ^.+€eK-tNcl
zxl?,'C-E-O,-\F. fR|Pl
- 7/6 Re. C.EDA.F-Pg-rr.\zooe@F.tT
cF-o,,AR- TN|Yvl$'&=. cE-oA,rR.P!-Y\.vooc>
=ortrtT
Z',x.lz. LOOKOUf€t)+T'Z4"O.C-. I
fascnadtl,,A
+/d c'Ox FL-r\,A/ooDo\/eJq. Z ><z +t-*-?e-{t +47 tei'o,c, ovE-t\/z'' c-9.x Fr-Y\A/ooD
Z xlZ
ta.ArTER€>
t- z*ti
BL-OC-'<.Jt{C1
,Z^b!- E.tr)Al\ f,Aeer,a.coN.l-. +<-REf-r\
\,/F.r..l T wY/Z >< FvF.|{T \.\//Z x Fr-OC-r<-llxC1
fascna dfl"A
O.
12'Otro..2t19,,/":Vt7e-,>a Tt>FAruo ?oTr=|.}1pr'"aq;-€r
.-#L
PlAa<,#ft=r
. AT' +"O.e-,tl
'-z\>eP*-y<1F{Cl
r-, i | - |,A: f-.'l(l=o^.FR'lel F:zalt
;- 1l- J'-'- :lir bEilt ?wt+-l{-t P-?TAl-- -+ -l
tltr L_][| -Gi-;*
+ lre-oc454<-| +4-121ql\7
ffi:,gstfficv" .=ffi,,W
tu/d co>< Pr_Y\zr/oopO\/E.F Zy-Z. €rt-F F FE-R6,Z xZ €l-LE,PFJ\€thT lca"o,c-;TYf '
lzIMtN, C-ONT,,,AIREFAC.F-+T\,\,/E.F+lVAIJI-..!f,At\l O Z*Z.+TA Sz=lVr
AT lAttor-, OVETR.' V2" e-ox pt-y\ /oor>
+oc-KJ
zrllz'c-E-cl/r,F.
''C-EDAI\ r^ec-L,\
Nq
TF|Pl
i' Re, c-F.gA.t\Pt-wrzooo€oFrrf
fasonadtil,
,'|oL--r1,l\./ooD
^z T lA"Or-.
frd c-e>< Fr-Yvvoot)'ovEo. ?><? ++.E-?E+.^'A-T ld'or-., o\2g11 'vd'c-o.x Fr-Y\A/ooo
Z xl=
F\ArrF-R€
coNI, €c-R.FJ.rrl
rze-xr l- w/z >< E
bLoC.KJFlCl
,zxbc-B rr^\r\ rAec-t^
C-F.AAR TRJH
' VIE R.e, CF '-! -\f-\tr--r\,^/ootr>.=orrrT
'7:l? l-ooK(3ure T 4"O,C-.
fascna @lt["A
=YNTHSTIC-%7.)e-co
Y1,^lF{A,;>Y*--_-TI,-ffi=,tAr
L-c^Y\.1F-F_WLI
1'-
-_-rr
---l+
IT,O.-, r IT'O.-, r Ig$sLd( |
@.o%'rT:o;f6368
T,O,F,
8v8z:-o4Al
T-
+
-T
dr[- l-1r-ar'q1-c.'.\'r
.TBlr.1 To
- I"4A:TE-Hr^u_t
lZtr>tF,f,:;4^4--- - -/
o
-t2'OtF-?TP,tPI?'CATTt>F- /alvo fl|TToW
I
r
I
:rl? E/+irT- tF\,./+FCF. AAF.(tvlfu.e R.Oc-l
It
li
h
-F
ll
ll|l
-11tr
heast
o-Nr
)<
><*
l2's-4'w4(z roTrt-)C-OuNrTF-1a'c-jrJFuTtl\-
=lN|< l%."
'=_\.\\
.----._.--\.
=>Yr\TH-r|Jc-c-
=V@eF.oc-F*
8><&
:
-/-t
t
+/d e- o ><. Pr-=rl^zoa,-O\./E8. Z,.2 €'I-F F PE.RE,t .ZxZ €r[-E-E-,PF-R€hT lb"o,c;TYF'
/, lz"l-4tA, c-oNT,/ I A|F.r=-FACE_I FET\^,/!s.F+I
V/ALl-E-a'..t/A.'\,f F Z-2.+TO.\ZF.NIT
< P L-'^\/\1ooo
=><Zry la"oc,,
N VE-r{r
AT la"q-, oye{\
- .Yet' c-o >< ?t--(\7/@o
' l*Ca
- "C-EDla\R f,A€CrA.
_F*-oel<JNg
zrllz.'c.EEtA'\ TNr-1';-.+/d' Re, c-EEtAt\Pl-).\^/ooDeoFrrT
fasona dt[,
4/d c.Dx Ft-Y\/voopo\,/E14. Z ><Z €[-EE-PE86:?*f l4'o,c-, o:z6ga'Yd'c-ox Pr-Y\A/ooo
'= t< lZtrArTFr(€,
br-oc.K.lNg
,Z*b€,E-QAR l,Aec-rr.
CONT. #.REJJ\
t-- zll
CONr. ='C-RE-EJ\ \i=
\,/E^r f w/z >< l=r...oc-Kt Nci
?>.lZC.F-DAR TFlt'.,1- 7le lae, C/E..D-\I\.PI-Y\/\/OOD-€o;p11
|Z.x.lZ. LOOKOLJf€>,S 4t,O.C-..
fascna @lt[,
VN dt[,
lvlOe--_F.OCJ<\
| 43a' '-o4:7-_fi
=
ao-o-_r
.^lz
I
T
Frrjlz++<1. .O,r'1"!>.f L iltl
Iil-
+-------
Uett 1-l
e=79! eo>< Pr-Y\zr/oop.o\,/EJe. Z><Z 6LF F PEReZ xZ €|-LEfF-lce'71 le!'o,crTYr,
lz"l'-1 rN, eoNT,;,AIR€FAC-LEFT\1,/E1r+lVALr-L:a
7a.f! D Z1.ZA
To V.-Ff\tT
41 16tt&-, OyE-1R./et'cox pr-*f\/\/ooo
ZxQ-c-eD,AR l&t^
+-ocK.JNcl'Z*lZ
PL-r\/\/OOp€roFfrf
fascnadtl,
z/1,:- r,
'>< F l-\f\A./OoDZ><z/4T lb"Ot-,
:-t\J \/EJ!T
b/d cox Ft-Y\A/oopOVE-R. Z>+Z =L-E.t-Pre,.-,AT l4'o.cr, ovF!\'Yd'c-o.x Fr-Y\A/ooo
Z:<lZ
|3!,,ATTER+
br-oc-r<tNC,
c-F-pAR. TNP1+t?)'**, c,f Fr5q.
Pr--f\,\/oOO
fascna @lt[,
=a1,,=
Pt-Y\,\/OOp:=arrtT
&._.t
F\=rC-tA
l-1,AlFII l-e,\./l= | '@rzd
*h +ffi_r_ __r I
)steilevatnon
)"
Tvrot- L. I| | | lr!-.,z-\l-R-oor c-of-+=T F.-LJCT I c)N
7)'F.1/r...gyp,7?e-PT Tt>P
^.r\rD
BoTT?3tt4lQ.rA{t-e | '
E-f!Dpg.aap_et
'Y4rA*r7,)l
7W="wa+
17')te,9+,'LOC-,C-er_r.-
--t4'+q,
='T:FFJLPlA{<#IEIft"@,c,
--7><<z
PErlC4*-|t-1O
' C4t-J L-'4M:ell=,1.r4 -'=*- Ft-+N
6+---
BnnetinNo.2S
James X. Fazio, Editor
tor the
Frtends ofltee City UM
Placing aYalue on Trees
It is easy to think of reasons why trees in the community are important, but it is more difficulttrlring to_ assign a dollar value. This is because trees appeil to emotions as well as having apractical, or functional, side-. Through a better underitinding of the many ways trees ari val-ued, urban and community forests cin be managed more effedtively and.iitft g..t." sensitivity.
When a logger and a poet vierv the
same tree, it is no surprise that they are
unlikely to describe its value in quite the
same rvay. Less expected is what
happened not too long ago rvhen two
foresters were asked about the rvorth ofa
street tree. The story goes that a
landowner had trvo large oaks in the u'ay
of highway construction. Dunng
negotiations about the value, a forester
was called in who placed the figure at
$300 per tree. This was based on the
going price offirewood at $7b per cord.
Seeking a second opinion, the landorvner
found another forester rvlro used an
appraisal folmula and arrived at a value
of $10,000 per tree! As is usually the
case, the right tree in the right place had
more value as a shade, or. larrdscape. tree
than for any products it mirlht yieid. A
third side to this story is thrrt the owner
himself treasured the tree nrrt in terms
ofdollars at all, but as part ofa rich
store of pleasant memories.
It is easy to place a value on trees
that are grown solely for products.
Foresters have done this for centuries. It is simply a matter of utility rvorkers and business professionals, this is an aspect
often ignored during the math and science of college courses or
in the hard-nosed rvorld of s'ork. Yet it can explain why
controversies arise over trees and why all workers need to use
special care in working around trees. It can also help in
building forestry programs that people will support.
The second section explains how an attempt is made to
piace a dollar value on tr.ees in a rvav that all'panies
consider fair'.
The problems anse rvith non-commercial values. What is
the value ofa shady place for an afternoon barbecue? Horv
much is the- beauty of trees rvorth rvhen you rvant to sell y.our.
house, or when a drunken driver destroys your flowerini
dogwood? Horv do 1'ou place a value on a tiee that rvas ilantedby a depafted parent. or that stood at the crossroad.s rvhen
Civil War soldiers marched past?
In the follos'ing pages. tl.ees sill be looked at in ts.o rvavs.
First is rvhat trees mean to the heal't. To fo).ester.s. der.eloucrs.
measuring wood volume (usually in tems of board feet of
lumber or cords of pulprvood or fuelwood t, and multipl-ling by
the current market value. Similarl5'. trees in an orchard ire
valued based on the bushels of fruit they produce and the
market price for that product.
It rs alsu an imporlant step tol ar.d puttingiommunin'
on pal l'ith u15g1, public sen.iccs.
rrdsandthePt&
\
F:.
In 1882. the greatlandscape architect Frederick Law' '
?ti:l.:ii'"':l:il:ifi;flTH'fiu:I;::iq!!::i:^e:i":{"
:lT,3fii,l',';ffi :l,l';,tg'S::i;',l,'5i'iiiil'"i"*'*=
;fiiffi i+*ll -;*ilrrii"d';ffi *iill:r
the bodY'
,t*,'-"":nrH"-lfil:"#*ill"trfh:ilil{if
:lrfi?
Tl::::';n:.i,i:;f :,!;11 jlluiil',3f ::;i':'i':';'1:;':"!''
iltlirlr"r criit arrd are irtrportant'
Reflection on Change
------:-----1 Scientrsts at the USIA Fo:""*P^::'nt";
"J:lt";;;;"J"'r'i..
* ct'i*e" ueliese that a
i.ii "r-"l.",
i" the psychological tie rvith
irl,i".i" lr," "r,irit-'-
of t'e"t to helP us refltecr
i'*.ii,liv "t life's changes obsenrng tne
5l;;;;;i oi *ea'onal.chanse' tree sro\\th'
l;'il.:." ,t"- death' have.been mentroneo
il;;iilrv ;i .'^ "l l?:1f:111,1,1"
"wt"ini.tg
t'r,, tn"r'ttli' oj""Jut" in t'ititing the Morton
of l'eal estate'
i r.rt Reduction and Hgalt\An'boretum '
ffiffi
Svmbols of Human Character, r. ..-^-i-dc" J '--- -= | Trces ha'e deep symbolic meanngs'
t".r',.lit''i*'f']I"" i'"iii 'r''"t
r'e are tas
i'" "a*it:".
rt ""s are seen as l'epl'e-sentrng
:;;;'ri';". ". "'"'d:l.tl, "TiltfllrL:'il;
even in the face ol adverstY"
l"e'""i"'" ."ee"."t' ti:"i::]\"iil".,*1J:i "er:en equate out henf,age rvrtr
it*. 1t" "r* appll- human l"t::..t"":T*;;; " qr+?ii::'"" ri :l:'.::lii *ll"v:ll,l.:.
ffl. \i [li] :lil5'l:Sil'i'il'1o'"fri'"'"'"n*' r'equir cd
-
ferter stt'ong pain rcltevct's'':id t^*t*]l"i.ltal s(roner tnan
il::l,l;:,1'1'l;:'i' ;'; i ;;' ;'t;" or a hr ick rvarr
t _ ""r I It'\'I r'\ ltl Il I ll\ \'r' lt{ t \ ir'Nl \'h}' l) r\ ltl'_ll:
t'ee \\ e "tl' ri""ol1ttg' it"e doctors and
-such as limbs. injurics' sufferi
that nranl.cillzells *le\r-trses
sur.selv. lt i s. I ro \\ on der".r Ti;'j l,]i-i]:';;; de.err.i n g of pit .
as fi'agile and itrtrocent' cvct't
Svmbols of Continuiw O fire Real cilof vandalism
In recent years entire organizations
have sprung up around interest in
planting the offspring of famous trees.
Whether they are from seeds that trav-
elled to the moon or cuttings from a tree
planted by Geolge Washington, the trees
represent a continuous, living link with
the past. Similarly, *'e plant birthday
trees and memorial trees. Mere modals come and go, btrt'
trees are seen as the bridge between genelations.
Symbols of Religion
TYees play a role in virtually all
religions. Some hold certain trees sacred,
others refer to trees to help teach tenets,
and all, like the story of Buddha receiving
enlightenrnent under the rvisdom tree,
contain stories associating important
people *'ith trees. Also, we often refer to
forests, gloves oftrees, or even a street
arched by tree canopies, as crthedrals. In the presence of
large trees, people frequently profess feelings of humility, awe
and reverence.
The Dark Side
Unfortunately, not all people feel a kinship rvith trees.
Some actually rierv them rvith worry. Research by the USDA
Forest Sen'ice cites these reasons for the fear:
. Trees can hide criminals rvho ma1- attack.
. A fear ofgetting lost.
r A fear ofcontracting Lyme disease.
. Trees harbor animals and insects that may invade
the home.
. Branches or entire trees may fall. causing damage, injury
or death.
There are some who hate trees, or express hate through
what they do to trees. Reasons range from revenge and
ingnorance to attempts at thwarthg thti plans for a park or
the expenditure of public funds on tree care.
The destruction of old trees touch deeply iato human
emotions. Whether for mad construction, power line
clearance or tlrough acts of vandalism, when trees die,
people are affected It may not even be the landowner
involved, but others who simply pass by or associate the
trees with some sigrificant experience. One of the more
poignant examples is told by an Alabama resident, Cathe
Steele, who rvent to visit a giant live oak that had beeu
girdled one night with a chain saw:
I thaught the people tlure might think I was strange,
crying ouer a tree like that. I could rct fathom why or how
anyonz would do such a thing as this.
As I walked. around thc tree, there was o linle girl
standing at the base of it, Iooking at oru of tltc huge limbs
that arched, down lihe a swing seat to ahnost touch the
ground.
The girl was about 17 years old and, was so quizt I didn't
realize she was crying at first.
I put my hond. on hcr shouldcr and said maybe the tree
would liue, although not conuinced of it myself. Whot thi^s
child said to nre, I will neuer forget.
She began to tell me about fur fatlrcr. "He used to bring
me here to sit in the tree," she said.
About a year ago, her father had dicd from cancer. She
said she ntissed him and, it was hard to understand. why
Mtookhim.
Before he died, he brought hcr to the tree ond told her
that the tree u'as tery old, that it hod been here for hundreds
of years. He told lrer he would no doubt dic, but that this
oak tree would ahr:ays be here. He said that when he d.izd,,
she could cotne here to sit in thz timbs of this old nh and. it
would be like fu u,as with her forever.
To this little girl, the probablc deoth of this old. oah was
like losing her daddy twice.
I utalhed away and. cried,. It didn't m.atter anymore if
anyone thought I was stronge.
When trees die. people are affected. The
unnecessarT, clearing of roadside trees, such
os these large cottonu'oods in a trIiduest
suburb, euoked contntents front residents
such os, "I receited my inspiration eoch
day driuing past that grote." Another said,"llhetz the trees uere Eone, so utere the song
birds attd tree frogs I'd hear u'hen jogging.
A bit of mt- daill' plcasure "-onished with
those trees."
\
ll|!.1 ( l ll t \.r Il tl.l,tl\ \". ]fi . \rli.xrll .\.t|i,. lt : ]iund.rlntn . .l
Assigfiing a Dollut {hu.
In rccent years more and more attention has been gil'en to
the economic contributions of street and shade trees. These
values - rvhich are nearly alrvays estimates based on the best
available data - make a stlong statement on behalf of
planting more tlees and taking good care ofthe ones we hal'e.
Here are some examples from the USDA Forest Sen'ice.
100 million mature trees in U.S. cities (about 1.5
trees per single family home) can reduce annual
enelg'y use b.v 30 billion kWh, saving consumers
$2 billion plus avorded investment in new power
plants.
By planting 500,000 trees in Tucson, .Mzona, it is
projected that ailborne partjculates w'ill be reduced
by 6.500 tons per year. 'l'his convelts to a "particu-
late matter control" valuc of $1.5 million per year,
or $4.16 pel tree per year.
The tree canopy in an Ohio community reduces by
? percent storm rvater runoff and its associated
flood damage and \vater treatment costs. With
onll' a modest inclease in tree cover, the potential
reduction is L2 pelcent.
Trees and Your Home
Tree values translate to dollars most visibly when looking
at the costs of residential property. Numerous studics have
shown that tl€es increase the vaiue of property from 3-5 to 27
percent. Hele ale examples that help underscore the value
oftrees.
An analysis of 844 single family homes that sold in
Athens, Geolgia, revealed that houses with an
aterage of five trees tregardless ofspecies) in the
f.ont y""d qold fo" 3.5 to 4.5 pe
comparable houses *ithout trees.
A developer in Columbia, South Carolina, found
that bare house lots sold much faster after he
transplanted 2- to 3-inch diameter pines to the
lots. He more than paid for his efforts by increas-
ing the selling price by over $1.500 per ao'e.
-{ researcher shorved plrotos of house lots to both
professior.ral appraisers and recent home buyels.
B.r' incleasing the amount of tree cover in the
photos, estimates ofvalue rose 7 to 27 percent.
In a classic study of 14 r'aliables that might
influence the price ofsuburban houses in N{anches-
tel'. Connccticut. and Gl'eece- Nert York. trees
lanked sixth in importarrce in influencing the
selling price ofhornes. 'Ihey incleased sale prices
a l^ l5 rlar..aht
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
.r'ear'. Thc colrtribution of street and nearby park
trees to pl'opefiy va)ues rvould plobably double or'
t rinla thi s fi o, ra
T'he amount of taxes con
-orvned trees on lesident ial
Annual Costs and Benefits
To help 'Trees for Tucson' plan a
500.000-tree planting project, Dr. E.
Gregory McPherson, formerly of the
University of Arizona, constructed a
computer model to weigh the project's
costs and benefits. Using l'elvet
mesquite, a popular native species, for
the study, McPherson ilcluded
planting, annual water costs (about $2
per tree - less than used by one
person indoors in two weeksl),
pruning and removal as cost items.
Benefits included such things as
energy savings, dust control and
storm runoff management. As can be
seen in the chart, only during the first
five years did costs exceed benefits.
Removals near the end of the trees'
expected life spans account for the
convergence ofcosts and benefits as
the trees age. Overall, prcjected total
benefits exceed costs by $236.5 million
ovel a 40-vear oeriod.
ln Park Costs g Yard Costs n Slreet Costs
t Park Benefils B Yard Benefils A St''eel Benetits
3 in Million!
t99 6 2003 2006 2013 2018 2023 2025
{, T|ltit ( In t \\ lt| t.tt \ t...,lri. \Inrnrt r.lrrttr\ tsr{nrdirn'n
c.
r;
!.
Two houses built ot
approximately the sante
time, on tuo sides of the
sante street, sltotc a
narhed difference in /ess
than 10 years. By
planting !rces, the
ouners of tlte housa
aboue haue on
oppot'tunity /o ir? cr'('os(,
the ualue of thcir
properly and
significantlv rvducc
tlteir u,inter ltcoting ltills
and su nttncr air
conditioning costs.
6 Ways to Economically Use Trees to
Increase Your Property Value
L Protect existing trees during construction. See Bullel ins No. 7 and No. 20.
2. Transplant trees frpm elservhere on the property to the fr"ont la\t'n area or
other spots s'hele trees are ferver'.
3. Plant seedlings on propefty norv that is to be a building site in the futurrc.
4. Stlategicalll' place a few lar.ge trees from a nursery to enhance aestlretics
or increase energ- efciency. See Bulletin No. 21
5. Encourage the planting ofstreet tl?es in nervly developed ar.eas and
proper pruning in older areas.
6. Plune off an_r' dead ol d.ying br.anches in yard trees." !rs{,
.UIELL u,Nrrr*PED Y(rf,.
O 9tt*9eb 71,y1sa cL6e 7o PI€RS
C N€^R 9Kf.rE TRATL
O ENCR,EY EFFIAENT
IRli[ ( ll'l I s\ ttt lt.l ttr !r, Jd . \rrn!!rl.r.t!t. tr r.",.*"1 ", . 5
How Ufich is a Tree r?orthl
The Formula Method
It sometimes is necessary to place a specific dollar value on
a landscape tree. Typically, this helps settle legal claims for
the damage or death of a tree, assists with insurance pay-
ments, contributes to real estate assessments, and proves loss
for income tax purposes. Placing a dollar value on public trees
can also be used to help justify city expenditures for tree care.
There are several rvays to establish value, and a key point
is to hal'e it done by a professional. Only appraisals that
reflect experience and good judgement w'ill be able to stand up
in court or before a claims examiner. To obtain the services of
an appraiser, contact the Council of Tree & Landscape
Appraisers (CTLA) referenced on page 8.
The most widely accepted formula method is one developed
b-v CTI,A and published by the International Society of
Arboriculture. The following is not intended as a do-it-yourself
guide, but it should sen'e to illustrate the components of
landscape tree appraisal.
Factors Considered in Determining a Tree's Value
Size:Ttunks are measured for diameter' The
point of measurement depends on the
size of the tree. Diameter is then con-
verted to square inches of trunl area.
Trees 4" or Transplantable sizes Larger than
less larger than 4" transplanlable size\fu(^*=*.- Ftffi{ (at Point or measursmenr)
Species: A rating is assigrred to every species
within a geogtaphical region' The rating
is expressed as a percent of"ideal" (5'
1007o) for that area and is based on the
tree's suitability to climate and soils, and
generally how well it grou's there.
Aesthetics and functional attributes are
also considered. State foresters can
usually suPPlY this list.
Condition: A tree in good health is assigned a higher
condition rating than one plagu.ed by
disease, insects or physical damage. The
range is:
\lc dead or dYing
5-49q. Poor50-69C( fair
70'897c good
90-100% excellent
Location:
Location
value is the
average of
the ratings
for these
three factors
Site: ( 10-1007c)
Contribution:
( 10-100%)
Placernent:
(10-100%)
This is a highly subjective
rating ofthe general sur-
roundings, with emphasis on
quality and design. A well-
kept industrial park may be
rated 90, rvhereas a run-down
residential area could be 30.
But trees in areas ofintensive
tree care, such as along a
residential street, are usually
rated higher than trees in
industrial zones or that occur
naturally in woods along a
roadside.
The tree's functional (shade,
privacy, safety barrier) and
aesthetic attributes (fl owers,
shape, purposefi.rl place in
landscape design, wildlife
value, etc.) are in this judg-
ment. Historic values can be
considered here, but personal
sentimental values are not
taken into account in any
formula method.
The tree's placement affects
its function and aesthetic
value. A specimen tree in the
middle of the lawn would have
more value than a single,
beautiful tree within a grove.
A tree that is large at matu-
rity and has been planted
under utility wires or too close
to the house *ill result in a
low placement value.
6 . rRt[ ( | lr I \.\ ltl l.l.l t-t\ \,'. .18 . \jtnnril \rho. tt.t! t '\'i.trrn[
oa
I . f rr ,l | ,aAppra$ar Melnoo frl:
Replacement Cost
Trunk Formula [tethod
nurseries for the same or cornparable species ofthe same
size. TYansportation and pl;rniing costs at the same site
should be added.
lhis formula is then used:
Installedvalue = cost x Condition * $lqrldq
Note: In the case ofa casualty to be replaced, site is assigned
L00%
Appraisal Method #2:
Government officials -in Monroe Countl', Nett Yorh, u'ere able t<-s placc lree loss ot a
stagger.ing $97.1 nrillion uhen o dlsosrrorrs irc stornt stru<.h in li[art,h lggl. Estirnaring
tree t,alues dur-ing slreet an.d parh tree inrcnlories can he usclful u,hcn lrccs aro
su bseq u e n I I.t' d a nt o ged or. d cst rttl' cd..
-. Condition Location
' Rating x Rating
Trunk area of
a replacement
size tree
(TAn)
Step l. Basic Value =Replacement Cost of largest
normally available tree
locally
+
Basic Price (i.e. cost per
square inch oftrunk area of
the replacement tree)
x
(TAa - TAR ) The diference
between th-e trunk area of
the appraised tree and a
replacement tree
x
Species Rating
Tlees up to 8 inches in
diameter (4 in some localities
and higher in others) are
usually considered trans-
plantable. Value can then
be determined by obtaining
price quotes from three local
Trees too large for practical
replacement b-r' tt'ansplanting
are applaised by detelmirring
a basic value, then adjusting
by condition and location
ratings. A trvo-step process is
followed in making the
detbrmination:
Step 2. Appraised _ Basic
Va'lue - Value
Note: Increases in trunk diameter on large trees dramatl-
cally affect trunk closs sectional area, and therefore basic
value. In fact, it becomes unrealistic tn say, for example, that
a 3l-inch tree rvould be rvorth $1,300 more than a 30-inch tree
when most people could not even visually discern the differ-
ence, To account for this, adjusted trunk area.values for trees
over 30" diametel are presented in table form in the ;ighth
edition of Gzride for Plant Appral'sal tSee page 8t or they can
be calculated using the formula: ATA - -.335d + 69.3d2- 1087.
The Bottom line
Using the above Trunk
Formula Method, a 20-inch
diameter Marshall ash was
valued by the Council of Tree
& Landscape Appraisers at
$6,500. This rvas based on a
$1,343 installed, replacement
cost for a 6-inch balled and
burlapped tree, and species
and condition ratings of 70
percent and 80 pcrcent,
respectively. Site, contribution
and placement ratings for
location were found to be
60, 85 and 80 percent,
respectively.
I
=
l Ll.l. ( l l"l l r'{ ltl lll llr_ No. Jli . \:|li(x|:|l Arlxr. l|;.! ]i!u[.hiorr . 7
Other Sout.?t of Informat?on
Tree City USA Butletin will inform readels about helpful,
up-to-date publications that proude more depth, sen"e as good
model", ot ire readil-v available for community distribution'
The editor rvelcomes sample copies to consider for inclusion rn
revised editions ofthis and other Bulletins.
More Reading About Values
Assessing The Benefrts and Costs of lhe Urban
Forest by J. F. Dwyer, E. G. McPherson, H. W. Schroeder
and R. A. Rownlree. Journal of Arboriculture, September
L992.
An excellent summary ofthe environmental and social
values of community trees. Trventy-seven references
provide additional sources of information.
Trees Need Respect, Too! bv Steve Sandfort and Reno
C. Runck lIl. Journal of Arboriculture, June 1986.
This article is "must reading'and makes a strong case for
knowing the value of public trees before they are damaged
or removed. Often. this is enough to cause the rethinking
or relocation of projects, because it puts trees on par rvith
other engineering costs. The system described has proven
to be an important way to save trees and accrue funds
when trees are destroyed. It offers a lesson applicable rn
any community.
tJrban Forestry - Planning and Monaging Urban
Greenspaces by Robert W. Miller. Prentice Hall'
Englewood CIiffs, NJ.
"Values of Urban Vegetation" is a chapter in this excellent
textbook. It reviervs costs. benefits and values associated
with community trees and includes a discussion of
Internal Revenue Service rules and the $500 per tree limit
used by most insurance comPanies.
Tree City IISA Bulletin Q1993 The National Arbor Day Founda'
tion. John E. Rosenorv, publisher; James R. Fazio, editor;Gerreld L.
Pulsipher. graphic designer; Gene W. Grey, Wiiliam P. Kruidenier,
James J. Nighswonger, Steve Sandfort, technical revie\+' committee.
Special reriewer for Bulletin No. 28: James P. Rocca.
Although copl'right is vested with the Foundation, permission is
hereby granted for the contents of this bulletin to be reproduced for
non-commercial educational or public'sen'ice purposes provided the
source is acknowledged.
sooo52o1
Published for thefriends ofTree Cify t'fi by
AThe National\3J Arbor Dav Foundation
Technical Guide
. Guide for Plant Appraisal rEighth Edition,1992\.
Available from:
International Society of
Arboriculture
P.O. Box GG
Savoy, IL 61874.
This 103-page book is the esst'rrtial
reference for anyone Planning to
learn how to conduct appraisals of
trees, shrubs or other landscaPe
vegetation. Methods are coveled
in detail, with additional sections
on professional matters such as
liability protection and how to
testify in courl as an expert
witness.
Appraisal Assistance
Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers
1250 Eye St., N\V, Suite 500
Washinglon, DC 20005
The Council is made up of representatives of fir'e
plofessional tree and landscape otganizatiols. Bro-
chures fol public distribution. technical publications.
appraisal forms, audio-visual programs and a list of
Iandscapc appraisers are alailable.
To order additi orral Bulletln copies.', Friends of Tree City
USA members may obtain a single copy of this ol any of the
preceding Tree City USA Bulletins free ofcost. Quantities of
any issue are available at2io for $6.25 or 500 for $100. To
order: specify the issue number and quantity, and make your
check payable to "The National Arbor Day Foundation," 100
Arbor Ave., Nebraska City, NE 68410.
No. 1 llou to Prune Young Shadz Trees
No.2When a Storm Strihes
No. 3 Resoluing Tree-Sidewalk Conflicts
No. 4 The Right Tree for the Right Place
No.5 Liulng With Urbon Soils
No. 6 IJoru to Hire an Arborist
No.7 How to Saue Trees During Construction
No. 8 Don'f Top Trees!
No. 9 l/oru ta Write a Municipal Tree Ordinance
No. 10 P/ont Tlees for America!
No. 1l llour to Pret:ent Tree I Sign Conflicts
No. 12 \Vhct Cilr Foresters Do
No. 73 Trees for Wildlife
No. 14 iloru to Kill a Tree
No. 15 Honr to Recognize---<nd Preuent-Hazard Trees
No. 16 i/oru to Recycle Shade Tree Materiols
No. 17 llou to Landscape to Save l$ater
No. 18 ?ree City USA Growth Auard
No. 19 l/on, to Select and Plant a Tree
No. 20 A S-r's/enr atic Approach to Builrli ng With Trees
No. 21 llon' Trecs Can Sate Energl
No.22 Tree City USA: Foundation for Better Tt'ee
tr(orngement
No. 23 llorl to Conduct o Slreet Tree Inrentory
No. 24 lrees and Parhing I'ots
No. 25 Tree Line USA
1992 Annual Report and DirectorY
No. 26 Understo nding Landscape Cu/lilors
No. 27 Hotu to Manage Contntunity Notural Areas
No. 28 Placing a Value on Trees
How to ioin the Friends of Tree Cit.v USA...
To receive a subscription to the Tree Cny USA Bulletin,
and to become more involved in the community forestry
movement in your torvn and throughout America. send
a $10 dues-donation to Friends of Tree City USA,
The National Arbor Day Foundation, 100 Arbor Ave.,
Nebraska City, NE 68410. Make your check payable to
"The National Arbor Day Foundation."
C'uide
JorPlant
Appra$al
c
--=5*
'ry
"--
-:-
8 . TIDE ( tl"! t st tr( Ll.tt-t\ \o. ]t{ . \.rn,nrl ,\rlr,r l).r }irxrhln{r
{}::' ,:,'r- 2;rir;
loo Arbor Awnue ' f.lebraska city, NE 68410
o o 7
Editor
Bulletin No.
Jana [. Fazio,
TREE CITY USA
BT]ttBTIN
for the
Frtends oflfee Ctty USA
How to Save Trees During Construction
T
IJife is iust better when you are surrounded by trees. Bird
songs fill the air adding delight to daily routine. Trees cast
their sheltering shade as they moderate the temperature,
quiet the noise, and clean the air.
In summer, shade trees can save up to 5070 ofair-condi-
tioning costs. In winter, windbreaks can reduce heating bills
as much as 30?o.
As an organization, The National Arbor Day Foundation
worhs hard to encourage people to plant trees. Ho*'ever, it is
equally important to save the trees that Mother Nature has
invested years in growing.
-Saving trees during construction often reouires courage by
an individual - especially in communities where the
common practice is simply to bulldoze everything in sight
before construction begins. Of all the letters I receive here at
the Foundation, few inspire me more than the stories of
people who battled to save trees that were to have been
needlessly destroyed for a construction project. And few
sadden me more than the stories of people who willfully
destroy trees that could and should be saved.
But saving trees during construction requires more than
the right attitude. It requires the right actions. Bulletin
editor Jim Fazio has prepared a concise description of the
actions you need to take to ensure the health of existing trees
long after the sounds of construction fade away. I hope you
will put this good information to good use. Your ellorts will
pay olT for years as you enjoy the trees you've saved.
---j -/ . -)
( ,./ ,f,.'.zt?Zur itlrl*-_r. _ --
"
,onr,
"o""r,o*Executive Director
The National Arbor Day Foundation
Plan to Avoi0Trouble
One of the toughest
parts of building on a
wooded lot is also the
first step - deciding
*'hich trees to save
and which to cut. A
good rule to remember
is that it is easier,
cheaper and safer to
remove future prob-
lems before construc-
tion begins.
Here's how:
--1
\/-l
--l
I\t'rong
SS If the existins trees make it possible, iry for a good mix
Sfl of aees and sizes in the stand that remains after
construction- This is more visually pleasing, and
reduces the impact rvhen a tree does die-
Right Site, Right Trees
Detached (
Garage *\
Right
On a plat of your property, show the location of trees that
are important to you, Consider these in deciding the
location ofthe house, garage, driveway, *-alks, and patio.
Stake out the location of improvements for better visualiza-
tion. Sometimes by changing the angle of a building or
curwing a walk you can preserve the essential root space
of a prized tree.
Know your trees, or find someone who does. This is neces-
sary to help make the right decisions. For example, some
species growing in shade may do poorly ifchanges result in
more sunlight. Each species also differs in how it can
withstand root cutting or how susceptible it is to local
insects and disease. A knowledge of trees will help guide
vour decisions about which to remove and *'hich to save
Consider the vigor and
health of existing trees.
If the tips of the
branches are dfing on a
large tree or fruiting
bodies of fungus are
growing on its trunk. it
is probably over-mature.
In general, it is best to
keep only those trees
that are in good health.
An arborist can help you
evaluate tree health.
2 . II{EE (-ll'l l Sr nt Ulil'l\ \o - ' \ : , \i"i I'-r\ l nrrr\l !{r
7
Removals and Luning
Design with Nature
.To minimize root damaee. do not alter the terrain except where
absolutely necessary. Levelling, cutting and filling:
l. severs roots
l. removes nutrient-rich topsoil
Il. dries roots when soil depth is reduced
I
l. smothers roots when soil depth is increased
l. changes the natural flow of water
An architect can help by:
9locating buildings to harmonize with the natural terrain
I using posts, bridges and decks to suspend parts ofbuild-
ings over uneven terrain
Y raising par-ed driveways and using similar techniques that
minimize excavation
" ffJJ]"
trees tfre leaning over the site of future struc-
I It is usually best to remove trees that will be closer than
five feet from a new house.
d After all trees to be saved are selected and 4alkgd,lvith
brisht-color flassine. prune each one as needed. Follow the
guidelines of good pruning that are available from local
experts or are shown in Tree City USA Bulletins I and 2.
Prunins will help trees survive the stresses ofconstruction
activities. AIso, for safety, remove large limbs that will
overhang structures.
To allow maximum aeration and rvater penetration to tree
roots, select walk materials other than concrete or asphalt:
larger trees.
EE
Brick Flagston€
Honeycomb Block
Some Problems that Planning can Prevent
Good
pruning
neededI
Transplanting needed.
Use tire-resistant species
Posls and deck'
rather than loundation
with wall, needed
TR.Ef (_n-l t.S.{ ltt |-LETI\ \o. - . \..rr {r.rl \,lr,r t)r\ t,{irht.,rxr'. 3
\
Avoiding Daftage During Ctnstruction
As the organized chaos of building takes place' the surest
wav to protect trees that are to be saved is to: (l) work with
the boilder to lo". "llc
Below the Ground
A Cardinal Principle:
What happens belou' the ground is more important than ,o-hat
meets the eye aboue ground!
Barricrs th.t exiendbelond thc driplinc arc tgood say to protccttr.es during construction.
I High visabilily
i I plastic mesh
r fence
storage of buildins materials. sravel and soil. (2) work with
utility contractors to stake out the exact locations oftrenches.ar
y:! .."""4 g-rp"
"f t"".
Severing Roots
Some cutting of roots near construction is inevitable. but much
.is avoidable. For example. the routins ofundersround utilities
does not have to follow a straisht line from street to house.
Careful route selection can often avoid important trees. \lJren
that is not possible, tunneling is a good say to reduce damage.
To reduce trenching for foundations, posts and pillars can be
substituted for footers and lvalls.SoilCompaction
T-e-tcylels
sunival in the vears
&Lo_silgSSE!ructig!
.is protection of the
roots durinp
con6truction,
This is probably the
most insidious
problem because the
results of compaction
cutting off air and
{e!er.Pe$ec9!_Ige
soil show up slowly.
When barriers are
not possible to keep
away vehicles and
foot traflic, other
protective methods
that can be used
include: spreading
several inches of
wood chips; pumping
concrete from the
truck through
conveyor pipes
instead of driving
over root systems;
and bridging root
areas ,,r'ith plates
of steel.
Pit and Posl
Conslruction
Piers, Pillars and
l-Beams
Railroad iies
ChangingGrade
Ifa grade change is unavoidable,
a retaining wall can be used
to protect much ofthe root netw'ork.
It can also lend some pleasant
diversity to the landscape.
NewGjY
a;.i ''.
". o ,'.
New Grade
Original Grade
7
DrainageChanges
' If drrain is altered, there
will be a change in how
water drains from the land.
If flows are created that
add too much moisture to
a wooded site, a drainage
system may be needed to
maintain the previous
amount of moisture (which
provided the natural
growingconditions forthe existingtrees). Similarly, existing
trees along the edge ofa new pond may eventually die from
their roots suffocating. On sitesdepriued ofwater, irrigation
may be needed to maintain existing trees.
Above the Ground
Breaks and Scrapes
Even with barriers around trees, equipment sometimes
breaks limbs or gouges tree trunks. Watch for damage
and repair it promptly. See Tree City IJSA Bulletin No. 2.
soilchemistrV I
Poisonins or otheMrse alterins the soil can resultin weakened
trees, malking th.rn ro." ,',r..-"ptible to insects and disease. In
some cases, trees can be killed outright within a fewyears after
construction. To prevent adverse effects on soil chemistry:
P Spread heavy plastic tarp
where concrete is to be
mixed or sheet rock will be
cut. The alkalinity of these
materials can change the
soil pH.
5 Read labels. Do not use wood
products containing pen-
tachlorophenol. These are
deadly to roots. CCA-
treated timber (greenish
color) is a safer alternative.
5 Paint brushes and tools
should not be cleaned
over tree roots.
C Chemical wastes (paint
thinner, etc.) should be
disposed of properly
and not drained on site.
Irccal sanitary authori-
tieg can advise on
recommended disposal
methods.
Keep trees free ofnails, screw eyes and other fastening devices.
Use posts, not trees, for signs, electrical wires, pulleys, etc.
Communication is Essential
i
z
A
3
There are many techniqnes that will help save trees
during construction, but this in only one part of the
challenge.@
begins *'ith the property owner making it very clear to
the architect that mature trees on the lot are iust as
important as the size ofthe kitchen. In fact, you may
want to seek out an architect who has interest and
experience designing with trees in mind.
Communication continues as plans are discussed with
landscape architects, arborists, foresters, extension
agents or other experts.
Most importantlv. communication *'ith the actual
builder is essential. Many huilders sympathize with
the need to save trees, but often thev view it as too
time-consuming or otherwise costlv. Still others may
not know as much about tree-saving techniques as you
do, so there is an education challenge.
Finally, there are the dozer operators, truck drivers,
painters, masons, and a small army of others who are
on the site daily. \l'hile it is usuall-v not possible to
u'ork with each one or even lisit the site daily, it is
possible to convince contractors and foremen that vou
are serious in yorrr desire to save trees and that thev
need to rela.v this concern to their u'orkers.
Iltfl(It"l t\t]l(Llfll\\o.-. \.'rr{,'l \l'{ l',, l.i.n.l.,rr{r. 5
\
When this house was recently constructed, the 30-year-
old pin oak directly adjacent to it was kept vigorously
healthy, a result ofgood planning and communications.
These are the steps that were taken:
. The house was designed so that a terrace on piers was
located near the tree, not a wall requiring a foundation
6 and footings.
{ . As much of the tree's root zone as possible was fenced
offto minimize the compaction of the roots by
construction equipment and workers.
t+: r,'.. o The pier at the corner ofthe terrace nearest the tree
,+/-' ,,,^. ---^f,,ll,' l^--+^,1 l'-rr"aan nainr rnatc a^ tha '^^,
To Savt A Tree...
V'"' was carefully located between major roots so the roots
- ' were not severed.
-itr.{2 . Followine construction the soil in the root zone was
;s aerated by an arborist injecting pressurized water.
T . - . A fertilizer high in phosphorus was applied to.*- stimulate root gro*'th.
A beautiful, healthy, mature tree shading a new house
is the result.
A Word about
Vater, Bugs arnd
Disease
Despite your best efforts, trees in construction areas will suffer some degree of
stress. Unfortunatell-, trees under stress fall victim more easily to insect and disease
attacks.
A good *'a-v to help 1'our trees stay healthy is to provide adequate water during dry
spells both during construction and afterwards. Soil should be moistened to a depth of
approximately 12-18 inches. A good rule of thumb is to slowly apply at least one inch
of water per rveek over the entire area beneath the tree's branches.
Inspect -vour trees regularly and consult an expert if insect or disease damage
begins to appear.
Keep Your
Froper{Tr Fire Safe
In all regions ofthe country, homes in wooded areas are destroyed
each year by rvildlires. Keep your home and neighborhood safe by:
. breaking up solid areas ofevergreens.
. asking nursery professionals about fire-resistant shrubs to use
in landscaping.
. keeping trees u'ell-watered, regularly pruned and in healthy
condition.
. preventing build-up of leaves and old branches.
. making sure your roads and bridges allorv access for heary frre
equipment.
. and, ofcourse ... think! Prevent forest fires.
For more information about fire-safe construetion in wooded
areas, write for a copy olWildfire Strikes Home (National Fire
Protection Assoc., Fire Prevention Division, Batterymarch Park,
Quincy, MA 02269. )
6 . TI,EE crfy r :ra fir u,trn\ so. - . \.|lrD.,l nrhrl).I\ Ii{in,l.,rrtl