The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPRJ03-0138 B06-0191�` "fOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT Permit #: B06-0191 Project #: �?- F7(L'�"� -�13 g Job Address.: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Status.....: ISSUED Location......: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Applied...: 07/18/2006 Parcel No....: 210108102001 Issued ...: 06/22/2007 � fl 1 t- V{ Ll.'�GC F I �-1 u�j 7 � P�LbcK ��.ors � ��C- Expires...: OS/14/2007 OWNER MV PENTHOUSES LLC. A DELAWAR05/04/2007 PO DRAWER 2770 AVON CO 81620 CONTRACTOR G.E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION O1/16/2007 Phone: 719-473-5321 25 NORTH CASCADE AVE # 400 COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80903 License: 128-A APPLICANT R.A. NELSON & ASSOCIATES, IN07/18/2006 Phone: 970-949-5152 PO DRA4VER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A ARCHITECT ZEHREN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 1976 AVON CO 81620 License: C000001626 07/18/2006 Phone: 970-949-0257 Desciption: MANOR VAIL COMMON ELEMENT-RENOVATION OF EXISTING BUILUINGS A,B,C,D,E AND F; NEW UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE. INCLUDES VERTICAL ADDITION OF BUILDINGS B,C,D,E AND F Occupancy: R2,B,A2 Type Construction: VA Valuation: 0,000,000.00 Revision Valuation: ?? Total Sq Ft Added: 53285 **+s*****as*****r:r»r*r**e�+****�*�*�*****s*s�*#�*****rs**�**+*****s« FEE S UMMARY **�+�**r►****�**+�*�**«s*s*r**»*�+»*+►**�s*�r**+�*sss+*s**s* Building------> 164, 458. �5 Restuarant Plan Review--> $o. oo Total Calculated Fees--> 422, 205. so Plan Check---> 164 , 4 5 8. � s Recreation Fee--------------> $ 5 3, 2 8 5. o o Additional Fees----------> $ o. o 0 Investigation-> $0. 0o TOTAL FEES-------------> 422,205.50 Total Permit Fee---------> 422, 205.50 W ill Call-----> $ 3. o o Payments-------------------> 4 z z, z o 5. s o BALANCE DUE---------> $ o. 0 0 +*M*s�a►*******+�+*s*�******�**x►+***��»�*****�s****s�*****�**��*s*a*s*sars**a:a***+*+*s*sa***�a�***s**«*+»+*�**+s«+*****�r+*+**+r*+**++**a+s**+ Approvals: Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 08/18/2006 MROYER Action: DN F&F comments issued. submitted on 1-24-07 denied. Commets will be sent to GE Johnson. 04/16/2007 CSalli , Action: AP 06/19/2007 csalli Action: AP full building permit approved, see conditions �*�.�..*.*�,�.*.*.��*.«**:�*.�..*�.**.�*�.��**.*�*****.*.*�:*��..*�.*.�.**�.**�****.��*�***.*..***.*�,..*.*«*..�:�**.....*.�«**.�*.*..:..**.*.* See Conditions page of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCF�BY TELEPH E AT 479-2149 OR AT OIJR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM � 4 PM. ; �' � r^'� _,. ��w.._.__�. .. . �,; ,, ,;;,_...--� SIGNATURE OF CyWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNER ******************************************************************************************************** CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: B06-0191 as of 06-22-2007 Status: ISSUED ******************************************************************************************************** Permit Type: ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT Applicant: R.A. NELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC 970-949-5152 Job Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Parcel No: 210108102001 Applied: To Expire Description: MANOR VAIL COMMON ELEMENT-RENOVATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS A,B,C,D,E AND F; NEW UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE. INCLUDES VERTICAL ADDITION OF BUILDINGS B,C,D,E AND F 07/l 8/2006 Issued: 06/22/2007 OS/14/2007 ***********************************************Conditions:********************************************* Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: CON0008313 Approval of this building permit does not include approval of any new/changed signage for Manor Vail or the Ford Park pathway. A seperate Design Review application will need to be submitted and approved prior to construction or installation of new signage. Cond: CON0008552 Partial Permit Only. Approval is granted for fall 2006 work. Partial permit approved for fall 2006 work only. Logistics report is part of the approved documents. Work to include: Removal of existing pool and pool equipment building, new parking garage shoring system, new parking garage dewatering system, removal of minimal stone veneer on one chimney, heavy equipment access ramp to lower grassy area, temporary patch work of existing parking lot and walkways, patch stucco on one chimney. Letter from Zehren and Associates dated Oct. 16 shall govern and supersede any documents submitted previously as it pertains to the overall project scope and design direction. Still need to resolve some shoring issues that were released in letter dated 10/30/2006 by Colorado Inspection Agency. Entry: 06/19/2007 By: cdavis Action: AP Eight Week Phase approved for cosntruction. This condtion ***********************************************************************�******+************* TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ***********************+++*******+******+**********************************+**************** Statement Number: R070001074 Amount: $53,285.0006/22/200703:38 PM Payment Method: Check Init: LC Notation: #001265/MV PENTHOUSES LLC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B06-0191 Type: ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-081-0200-1 Site Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Total Fees: 422,205.50 This Payment: $53,285.00 Total ALL Pmts: 422,205.50 Balance: $0.00 *�*********************************************�******************************************** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmts -------------------- ------------------------------ ------------ RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 53,285.00 � ATTACHMENT B ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REQUEST �E ,�EC� BY JUN 18 2001 COLOi;Fa�r _INSPECTION h�� ..�ti _ Manor Vail TOVY11 O} V8i1 Vail, Colorado �—a� � s ��' �� . Building Permit Number�8' Allowance of Gore Creek to be Considered as a Public Way Introduction: All buildings are required to be separated from adjacent buildings by a fire separation distance. When this distance requirement cannot be met the buildings are required to provide a fire resistance rating to their eXterior walls to mitigate the risk of fire spreading from building to building and to protect exterior exitways. Code Sections/Requirements: Exterior Wall Fire Resistance Ratin�s: The Building Code, 2003 (IBC), Table 602: Fire resistance rating requirements for exterior walls based on fire separation distance. If a building has a fire resistance rating of less than 30' the exterior walls are required to be rated based on the contents of Table 602. Fire Separation Distance: The International Building Code, 2003 (IBC), Section 702.1: Definition of fire separation distance as "The distance measured from the building face to the closest interior lot line, to the center of a street, alley or public way, or to an imaginary line between two buildings on the lot. The distance shall be measured at right angles form the face of the wall. Exterior Exit Discharge Location: The International Building Code, 2003 (IBC), Section 1023.3: Exterior balconies, stairways and ramps shall be located at least 10 feet from adjacent lot lines. Code Intent: The intent of these code sections is primarily to prevent fires from spreading from one building to another. Request: To allow for the adjacent stream tract for Gore Creek to be counted as a public way for the purpose of calculating fire separation distance and exterior exit discharge location only. Justification: The existing property line is less than 10' from the existing building in many locations. Seeing as these are existing conditions, it is impractical to provide the necessary fire separation distance from the property line of exterior walls and exterior exits. The property line in question is shared with the adjacent stream tract for Gore Creek, which is Town of Vail right of way. Due to the adjacent property being a stream tract upon which no buildings can be built, the calculation of fire separation distance relative to the centerline of Gore Creek meets the intent of the code to provide adequate fire separation between adjacent buildings for exterior wall and exterior exit location. E�ibit B Manor Vail AMR for Public Way November 6, 2006 Page 1 of 2 4�C� �7 Summary: This request is a result of the existing conditions of having an existing building that is closer to the property line than allowed per the strict letter of the code definition for fire separation distance and exit discharge location. By allowing the Gore Creek stream tract to be counted a public way for this calculation, the intent of the code is met while not putting the existing building into violation of the code. We respectfully request your approval of this Administrative Modification. � Brian Sipes Project Architect Zehren & Associates,� L"fiarlie Davis Chief Building Official Town of Vail Mike McGee Deputy Chief and Fire Marshal Vail Fire and Emergency Services / � ,� �� :�,��,�� ,,/��'�,� , � Bob McCleary General Manager Manor Vail Resort � � `�� Jim Telling Owner's Rep ntat MV Penthouse, LLC Exhibit B Manor Vail AMR for Public Way Date � �� Date Date Date Date November 6, 2006 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT C ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REQUEST Manor Vail Vail, Colorado Building Permit Number B06-0258 REVIEWED BY JUN 1 8 2007 COLORADO INSPECTION Aut_i;�!'Y Aliowance for Second Means of Egress Through Bedrooms Introduction: All spaces in a building are required to provide a means of egress for occupants. These egress paths are required to be easily discernable and readily accessible in the direction of egress travel. As part of this requirement, egress through intervening spaces is not allowed to pass through a room that can be locked so as not to trap occupants. Code Sections/Requirements: Exit Access: The Building Code, 2003 (IBC), Section 1013.2 "Egress through intervening spaces": An exit access shall not pass through a room that can be locked to prevent egress. Means of egress from dwelling units or sleeping areas shall not lead through other sleeping areas, toilet rooms or bathrooms. Code Intent: The intent of this code section is to eliminate the problem of having locked doors in an egress path. In the "IBC Commentary" paragraph it states "As long as the egress door is readily openable in the direction of egress travel without the use of keys, special knowledge or effort, the occupants can move unimpeded away from a fire emergency. Request: To allow bedrooms to be used as part of the egress system, for the second means of egress only, from new dwelling units. This would be accomplished by the use of electric strikes tied to the fire alarm system. These strikes would release the bedroom door in the event of an alarm and allow occupants to pass through the bedroom to reach the exterior exitway. Justification: The existing structure located below the new units cannot be penetrated for new vertical circulation without eliminating privately owned space below. As a result, the vertical circulation elements needed to access the new fourth floor units have to be placed on the end of the buildings creating a large unit that is entered from one side. The result is that the bedrooms are then dispersed off of a central corridor to allow for the light and ventilation required for living spaces by code. Due to the size of these units and the requirement for two exits to be located 1/3 the diagonal by code, the second means of egress from these units is required to be through a bedroom. With the use of electric strikes tied to the fire alarm system, in a emergency egress event these bedrooms will become unlocked and the doors readily openable in the direction of egress travel to meet the intent of the code. Manor Vail April 10, 2007 AMR for Egress at Bedrooms Page 1 of 2 ar�'� C F , •, .. Summary: This request is a result of the existing conditions that have influenced the layout of the new units. As a result, the second means of egress leads through a sleeping area. When provided with an electric strike tied to the fire alarm system, the door will not be locked, and occupants can move freely to the exitway in case of an emergency. We respectfully request your approval of this Administrative Modification. � 4/ 10/07 Brian Sipes Date Project Architect re & Assoc' s, nc. C�1'iarlie Davis Chief Building Official Town of Vail Mike McGee Deputy Chief and Fire Marshal Vail Fire and Emergency Services �7 . � �// � � ��. ��, ��_�' !�<.( � Bob McCleary General Manager Manor Vail Resort � � Jim Telling Owner's Repr ntative MV Penthouse, LLC � SJ�C i � Manor Vail AMR for Egress at Bedrooms �t. IZ C f� b� S' �p C�U+ti./ � �o l `r10� Date Date Date Date April 10, 2007 Page 2 of 2 F: ,_ � . ,' �� C��' �'�,� ` 75 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colorado 81657 �_._.� APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSIG ? Project #: ,��J` 6 �� O • O Be�ilding Permit #: � � ,. . .. ��:��_ . ? TOWN OF VAlL BUILDtNG PERMIT APPLBC��'it�� Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, rr,eclia�icai, etc.! c:UNTRACTOR INFORMATION �neral Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact Person and Phone #'s: R.A. Nelson Associates 170-A Ton V �U c_� y angalis ,�7Ci 94. 5152 �ailaddress: tvangalis@ranelson.com Fax #: ;s�o1 949-437� ntractor Signature: _..� L/ P�ll � COMPLETE VALUATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMIT Labor 8� Ma�eriais BUILDlt�1G: $ 3%, oo��, ooc ELECTRICAL: $ 5, oao, coo ar�E�: � ! PLUMBfNG: $ 2, oao, o0o MECHANICAL: $ 6, 000, o00 �;,, ;�,�,, ;,�,r, T�TAL: $ �'or Parce/# Confacf Ea /e Count Assessors Office af 970-328-8640 or �isif av�vr�r, ea !e-co� ��1"��`� See attached list of pa��.el numbeLS for each cwner account Jnb Name: Manor Vail Condominiums Job Address: sas East va�.1 Valley Drive ; Legal Qescription Lot: A Block: Filin � 9� Subctivision: �'�i1 Village Owners Name:, Address: rawer von, Manor Vail. Penthouses LLC ' Phone:t°�o� 748-7552 Architect/Des�i�qner: Address: �E �ast Beaver Cree B vd #3G3 Zehren an� ssociates Phone: ;G`70) 949-025'1 Engineer: Monroe Neo�ell Address: P.o. sox 1597; Avon, co ei6ao Phone� ,> > t 70. 949-'77b6 Detailed description afwork: Renovation of existing buildings ABC DEF and New Underg±_ounry p�rKi�1� �,nr��,E Includes vertical addition of Buildinos BC DEF, Work Cfass: New (�.� Addition ( X) Remodel X ( ) Repair ( ) Demo ( ) Other ( ) �Nork Type: Interior O Exterior O Both ( a} Does an EHU exist at this (ocation: Yes O No (�) Ty�e of Bldg.: Single-family O Two-family O Multi-family (x) Commercial (x) Restaurant O pther O f�la. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: ia3 No. of Accornmodation Units in this buiiding: o No/T e of Fire laces Existin : Gas A liances X Gas Lo s Wood/Peilet Waod �urnin No/T� e of Fire laces Pro os . as A lian Gas Lo s Wood/Pellet ) Wood Burnin NOT ALLOWED Does a Fire Afarm Exist: es ( X) () Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes (� No () ,�*********,�*�*�* ************** * ** � FOR OF CE USE ONLY*******«*************«****�**�***�*******�,�***,�*�*�** / e of Co tructio � � jL; l`( ;; 1;-, iI `;�;1 �� ,, .'� �cupa , - - =� , �, � n oup: � Acc � ted B�� CI � � � I V JUL 17 2006 �� :� �� 1` �. ��CC�.vfl �5 -1 � °�� u I� I , �devIFORM1I rmits\Building �buil ' _ ermit_4-21-06.DOC �/� � � p �'(��`�j � ��" '��,'� j,� �I� �� a e-1-e 1 _._.___..._..._.__._�....��/��.�06 � � �awxoFV� _ ASBESTOS TESTING REQUIREMENTS i�__._� THE TOWN OF VAIL AND STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH REQUIRE ASBESTOS TESTING ANY TIME WHEN MORE THAN 160 S.F. OF MATERIAL WILL BE DISTURBED OR REMOVED. AN ASBESTOS TEST AND REPORT IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ALL REMODEL, ADDITION OR OTHER PROJECTS INVOLVING ANY DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL OF BUILDING MATERIALS THAT MAY CONTAIN ASBESTOS. BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED AFT'ER OCTOBER 12, 1988 THAT HAVE NO ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ARE EXEMPT. A COPY OF THE REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION • I have included the asbestos test and report with my building permit application � applicant OR 7 r -� date 6 • I certify my project will not disturb or remove more than 160 s.f. of building material. The construction plans submitted with my application clearly indicate this information. (This will be verified during plan review, and will delay your project if found to be inaccurate) applicant signature � date • The building was constructed after October 12, 1988. The date of construction was applicant signature date original construction date F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\building�ermit_4-21-06.DOC Page 4 of 16 04/21/2006 � �, p ,� : WHEN A"PUBLIC WAY PERMIT" IS REQUIRED �� PLEASE READ AND CHECK OFF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS REGARDING THE NEED FOR A ��PUBLIC WAY PERMIT": o Is this a new residence? YES NO X o Does demolition work being performed require the use of the Right-of-Way, easements or public property? YES X NO o Is any utility work needed? YES X NO o Are there any improvements being done to the driveway? YES X NO o Is a different access needed to the site other than the existing driveway? YES NO No o Is any drainage work being done that affects the Right-of-Way, easements, or public properry? YES NO X o Is a"Revocable Right-of-Way Permit" required? YES NO X o Is the Right-of-Way, easements or public property to be used for staging, parking or fencing? YES NO If answer it NO, is a parking, staging or fencing plan required by Public Works? YES NO If you have answered YES to any of these questions, a°Public Way PermiY' must be obtained. "Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Works office or at Community Development (a sample is attached). If you have any questions please call Leonard Sandoval in Public Works at 970-479-2198. I HAVE RE AN ANSWERED ALL THE ABOVE QUESTIONS. v Contractor ignatu ]ob or Project Name: Manor Vail Condominiums Date Signed: July 12, 2006 R.A. Nelson Assoicates Company Name F:\cdev\FORMS\Permits\Building\building�ermit_4-21-06.DOC Page 7 of 16 04/21/2006 TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CO 81657 970-479-2138 Job Address.: Location......: Parcel No..... Legal Description: Project No...: OWNER APPLICANT CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL 210108102001 �'- ,�T b '��- � t 38" JANNA CORP 2949 E DESERT INN RD STE 1 LAS VEGAS NV 89121 R.A. NELSON & ASSOCIATES, PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A R.A. NELSON & ASSOCIATES, PO DRAWER 5400 AVON Colorado 81620 License: 170-A ZEHREN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 1976 AVON CO 81620 License: C000001626 07/18/2006 Permit #: B06-0191 Status...... Applied.. . . Issued .... Expires... : ISSUED 07/18/2006 11/15/2006 OS/14/2007 IN07/18/2006 Phone: 970-949-5152 IN07/18/2006 Phone: 970-949-5152 07/18/2006 Phone: 970-949-0257 Desciption: MANOR VAIL COMMON ELEMENT-RENOVATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS A,B,C,D,E AND F; NEW UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE. INCLUDES VERTICAL ADDITION OF BUILDINGS B,C,D,E AND F Occupancy: R2,B,A2 Type Construction: VA Valuation: 0,000,000.00 Revision Valuation: Add Sq Ft: 0 Fireplace Information: Restricted: !t of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas Logs: 0 /i of Wood Pellet: 0 *****�***:��**********x:*****�********�*******�*�:********************* FEE SUMMARY ****�****�************�*******�****�*******�x��*:x****x��**�** Building------ > 184 , 4 58 . 7 5 Restuarant Plan Review--> $ o. 0 0 Tota] Calculated Fees--> 3 6 s, 92 0. s o Plan Check---> 184 , 4 5 8. 7 5 Recreation Fee--------------> $ o. o o Additional Fees---------- > $ o. o 0 Invesrigation-> $0.00 TOTAL FEES-------------> 368,920.50 Total Permit Fee---------> 368, 920.50 Will Call----- > $ 3. 0 0 Payments------------------- > 3 6 8, 9 2 0. 5 0 BALANCE DUE---------> $ o . 00 *******��*�*******************�****************m*************************�:**�:***************�****x:***************�******************�******�:**** Approvals : Item: 05100 BUILDING DEPAR.TMENT 08/18/2006 MROYER issued. 11/02/2006 MROYER Only. Approval is granted Action: DN F&F comments Action: AP Partial Permit for fall 2006 work. Partial PAGE 2 �:**�*�*�:�*�:*�*****�:*��*�**��:��:*��x��:*�***��*��*��:��**�x�x��*:��*�:��*�**��*��:**�x�*��x�x�x��*�x CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Permit #: B06-0191 as of 11-15-2006 Status: ISSUED �x��:�*�:*�*�=�*******�x�*��*��*�:�:�:�**��*�***�:**�:��:��**��*��:��**��x��*��x��*******�:��*�:**�***��* Permit Type: ADD/ALT MF BiJILD PERMIT Applicant: R.A. NELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC 970-949-5152 Job Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Parcel No: 210108102001 Applied: To Expire: Description: MANOR VAIL COMMON ELEMENT-RENOVATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS A,B,C,D,E AND F; NEW UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE. INCLUDES VERTICAL ADDITION OF BUILDINGS B,C,D,E AND F 07/18/2006 Issued: 11/15/2006 OS/14/2007 �*�*��*�x��*�****�x�**��:��:�:**��*�*�:��****��:�xConditions: ��*��*�**�:**�:**�x�x***��**�*��*�x�***��***��* Cond: 12 (BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. Cond: 14 (BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS TO BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL. Cond: 1 (FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BE STARTED. Cond: 40 (BLDG): (MFR/COMM) FIRE ALARM REQUIRED PER NFPA 72. Cond: CON0008313 Approval of this building permit does not include approval of any new/changed signage for Manor Vail or the Ford Park pathway. A seperate Design Review application will need to be submitted and approved prior to construction or installation of new signage. Cond: CON0008552 Partial Permit Only. Approval is granted for fa112006 work. Partial permit approved for fall 2006 work only. Logistics report is part of the approved documents. Work to include: Removal of existing pool and pool equipment building, new parking garage shoring system, new parking garage dewatering system, removal of minimal stone veneer on one chimney, heavy equipment access ramp to lower grassy area, temporary patch work of existing parking lot and walkways, patch stucco on one chimney. Letter from Zehren and Associates dated Oct. 16 shall govern and supersede any documents submitted previously as it pertains to the overall project scope and design direction. Still need to resolve some shoring issues that were released in letter dated 10/30/2006 by Colorado Inspection Agency. permit approved for fall 2006 work only. Logistics report is part of the approved documents. Work to include: Removal of existing pool and pool equipment building, new parking garage shoring system, new parking garage dewatering system, removal of minimal stone veneer on one chimney, heavy equipment access ramp to lower grassy area, temporary patch work of existing parking lot and walkways, patch stucco on one chimney. Letter from Zehren and Associates dated Oct. 16 shall govern and supersede any documents submitted previously as it pertains to the overall project scope and design direction. Still need to resolve some shoring issues that were released in letter dated 10/30/2006 by Colorado Inspection Agency. Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09/13/2006 Warren Action: APPR The phased approach has been approved by Planning. The set of plans addressing the concerns of CIA are approved. Item: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Item: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS 11/14/2006 ls Action: PA Approval to allow work within the 2006 calander year only. No approval granted for work proposed in 2007 from PW. ******�**�***�:**************************************�*****�:**�******************�***********�**************************��*****************��**�* See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit. DECLARATIONS I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved, International Building and Residential Codes and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANC� BY TEL�PHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM. . , � ./ // SIGNATURE � OW�QER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF `� M�vc.c-�1M L f�c-,.,.�-�w✓ �� LL G V.�� *�*�*****�***+**��**�****��*��**++++**��*�**�***�**+�*��**�*�***+*�+****��*****�**�**��** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement ��**:�**�x�*�**��********�x�******�:*�**�x*�x********�x*�****�***�x�x�x**�*�**++**��*******+**�:�**�*�* Statement Number: R060001982 Amount: $249,022.31 11/15/200602:54 PM Payment Method: Check Init: DDG Notation: MV Penthouses, LLC ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit No: B06-0191 Type: ADD/ALT MF BUILD PERMIT Parcel No: 2101-081-0200-1 Site Address: 595 VAIL VALLEY DR VAIL Location: 595 E VAIL VALLEY DR MANOR VAIL Total Fees: 368,920.50 This Payment: $249,022.31 Total ALL Pmts: 368,920.50 Balance: $0.00 *�x�:**�***�*�******************+***�*�********�*******�*�x*�**�x*�x***++*********�**�:*�*�x***�**�x ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code -------------------- BP 00100003111100 PF 00100003112300 PF 00100003112300, WC 00100003112800 Description Current Pmts ------------------------------ ------------ BUILDING PERMIT FEES 184,458.75 PLAN CHECK FEES -83,006.44 PLAN CK - project GFP012 147,567.00 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- .,... ...�.�. ..._ .} � ° �. . F` � �) �Y r f � .... .. .... ... . ...... ........�..._._.�� ,c � � ) S 1 1�;;,� �.� COGGINS' & ;: �: April 5, 2007 Vu � �� `��. 8 l.-- .� � �tr� �—�� t � - =' Caisson Drilling, Excavation Shoring, Tieback Anchors GE Johnson Construction Company, Inc. 5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 450 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Attention: Subject: Todd Raper Town of Vail Earth Retention Review Attachment H We have received Colorado Inspection Agency's earth retention review report dated November 9, 2006. We have reviewed their comments and appreciated their review effort. Our response to the earth retention comments are below with Colorado Inspection Agency's comment number located to the left. Response to earth retention comments: 1). Surcharge from the adjacent building structures was not taken into account for design because surcharge loading will not occur. Typically, surcharge will be taken into account where an adjacent structure located within the potential failure surface (please see the attached figure) as calculated by Rankine earth pressure theory. According to our calculations, drawings, and soil properties utilized, the bottom of the footing of Building E(closest to proposed earth retention) is not within the above mentioned zone of influence. Therefore, based on the zone of influence criteria, incorporating adjacent surcharge will not be required. 2). Comment due noted. 3). Values of 125 pcf for in-situ density (y) and 32 for phi angle (�) were utilized in our analysis. Utilizing the simple equation of equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) for active condition: (Active) EFP = Ka*y*Height Ka = tan (45 — (�/2)) 2 Ka = .307 (Active) EFP = (.307*125*H) = 38H Q��ii C�f 9512 Titan Park Circle • Littleton, Colorado 80125 •(303) 791-9911 • FAX (303) 791-0967 _ �. _ � �: � "� � � < r�,:. � `�_ � _.� ,';�,i + �' C � . � _��.r Caisson Drilling, Excavation Shoring, Tieback Anchors Values of 135 pcf for in-situ density (y) and 35 for phi angle (�) were provided in the geotechnical report. Again utilizing the simple equation of equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) for active condition: (Active) EFP = Ka*�y*Height Ka = tan (45 — (�/2)) 2 Ka = .271 (Active) EFP = (.271 * 135*H) = 37H As you can see, our value of 38H would produce a more conservative design then the value of 37H provided per the geotechnical report. In the many earth retention systems we have designed, we have never been asked to review our design with a more conservative approach. 4). Comment due noted. Communication with the general contractor and Coggins has occurred to coordinate sump pit area with earth retention system. 5). The drawings dated January 12, 2007 utilized for our earth retention design indicate a bottom of footing at 8155.66 while our bottom of earth retention at 8156.50. Keeping in mind the face of earth retention 4 feet away (the excavation can be sloped from bottom of wall to footing (4 (H):1(V) slope), we believe the bottom of earth retention depth will be sufficient in this particular area. In addition, we will review this area in more detail to verify design. 6). Please see attached calculations. 7). Construction surcharge will not extend to face of earth retention because protection will be in place at top of wall to prevent traffic getting to close to wall. The present earth retention drawings dated Apri13, 2007 indicate less than 3 feet cantilever along the south wall. 8). Please see attached calculation incorporating 7 feet span. Steel reinforcement was verified adequate for 7 feet span. 9). Regarding lap length, comment due noted and please keep in mind this is a temporary earth retention system. Calculations refer to FHWA publication # FHWA-SA- 96-069,"Manual for Design and Construction Monitoring of Soil Nail Walls", November 1996 and FHWA publication # FHWA-IF-03-017, "Geotechnical Engineering Circular 9512 Titan Park Circle • Littleton, Colorado 80125 •(303) 791-9911 • FAX (303) 791-0967 �. _ � � � � � � � � 9 t ' C � . � . �sw Caisson Drilling, Excavation Shoring, Tieback Anchors No. 7 Soil Nail Walls", March 2003. These documents and others used for design were referenced on the last page of calculations. 10). Bearing plate thickness was verified adequate. After review of the calculation sheet, we have found a mistake in the bearing plate section. If we use a nail head load of 52 kips and a bearing plate size of 8 inch by 8 inch (64 square inches (62.5 square inches minus the bar hole area)), we calculate a bearing stress of 832 psi. The 832 psi is less than 3500 psi (.7*f c) which is acceptable. We appreciate the reviewer's comment regarding this item and our calculation sheet will be revised in the near future. 11). Others (the General Contractor) will submit design calculations and drawings to the project architect and structural engineer. If you have any questions, please contact us. Sincerely, �� RE.G j� o.•• �►YO�'y'��'.� _ �: s`� �, a . o �7�� ; : -� . , � 1 �: 4 ��r� .:: �� .......•� / John H. Hart, PE , . 9512 Titan Park Circle • Littleton, Colorado 80125 •(303) 791-9911 • FAX (303) 791-0967 � J O V � Z � 0 � N O o0 c� �fi N O o0 cD � N O o0 c� d- N O o0 cfl � N O o0 cD o� o� oo ao 00 0o a0 I� I� I� I� I� co c� c� co c� �n � �n ��n �� s- � � � r � � c- c- � � � � � � � � � � � e- e- � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i � � � � � � � � i i i i i � � � � � � � � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i � � � i � i � � � � � � i i � � � � � � i � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � i � � i � � � i � � � � � � � � i � i i � � I I I ( I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ��I I � � I I I � � I � I I I � I I I � � � I lol I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I�I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lal I I I I I i ml I I I I I I I I I I ZI� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I,I� I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I�� I I I I � � �, � � � � � � � � �, �, � �,, � � � � I I I I i�l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�� I I I I I I I I I I I I I lol I I I I ��I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�I I I I�I I'� I I I I I I I I I I I � �_� � � �� ,� � � � � � � � � � � �� . � � � � � � � � I IWI I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�� I I I I I ,, � � � � � � ,. �, � �, � , �,, I I I I I I I I I I I I 7� I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I� I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I� I I I I I I I I�I� lol I lol lol I lol lol I�I I I I � ^ � I I I I I I^I I�I I i I I°I I I`° I"I ml I I I �, �,, �, � �,, � �, � � � �,, �, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�� I I i I I I I I � � � � � � � � � � � �, � �, � � � � � �,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I� I�� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�� l ol I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�� I� I I I I I ,, � �, �,,, � � �, � � � �,, �, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�� I�� I I I I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I I I I IW� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l o� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I�I I I I I I lo� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Im�" I I I I �, �,, �, � � � � � �, �, � � �, ,,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , �,,,,, � � � � � �, � � �, � �, � �, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i � i I 1 1 I i i � � i i i i i 1 I I i 1 i � I I I I I I I I � I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I N O 00 c0 � N O 00 cD � N O 00 c� � N O 00 cD 'd' N O o0 c0 rn rn o0 00 00 00 00 I� I� I� I� I� co c� c� c� c� �� d- � � � � � � � � � � r— .— .— �� r- �— .-- � � ��— �— � � � � � � � � � � � W � � � � � � � � � � W � File: MANOR7 ****��********�***************�************�****** * CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION * * ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER * * DIVISION OF MATERIALS AND FOUNDATIONS * * Office of Roadway Geotechnical Engineering * * Date: 04-04-2007 Time: 10:58:04 * ***********************�*****�********************* Project Identification - MANOR VAIL - 7 ROWS --------- WALL GEOMETRY --------- Vertical Wall Height = 35.0 ft Wall Batter = 0.0 degree Angle Length (Deg) (Feet) First Slope from Wallcrest. = 0.0 100.0 Second Slope from ist slope. = 0.0 0.0 Third Slope from 2nd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Fourth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Fifth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Sixth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Seventh Slope Angle. = 0.0 --------- SLOPE BELOW THE WALL --------- There is NO SLOPE BELOW THE TOE of the wall --------- SURCHARGE --------- THE SURCHARGES IMPOSED ON THE SYSTEM ARE: Begin Surcharge - Distance from toe = 4.0 ft � End Surcharge - Distance from toe = 24.0 ft Loading Intensity - Beqin = 1000.0 psf/ft Loading Intensity - End = 1000.0 psf/ft --------- OPTION #1 --------- Factored Punching shear, Bond & Yield Stress are used. Page - 1 --------- SOIL PARAMETERS --------- Unit Friction Cohesion Bond* Coordinates of Boundary Soil Weight Angle Intercept Stress XS1 YS1 XS2 YS2 Layer (Pcf) (Degree) (Psf) (Psi) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 125.0 32.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * Bond Stress also depends on BSF Factor in Option #5 when enabled. File: MANOR7 Page - 2 --------- WATER SURFACE --------- NO Water Table defined for this problem. --------- SEARCH LIMIT --------- The Search Limit is from 0.0 to 40.0 ft You have chosen NOT TO LIMIT the search of failure planes to specific nodes. --------- REINFORCEMENT PARAMETERS --------- Number of Reinforcement Levels Horizontal Spacing Yield Stress of Reinforcement Diameter of Grouted Hole Punching Shear = 7 = 7.0 ft = 45.0 ksi = 5.3 in = 40.0 kips ---------- (Varying Reinforcement Parameters) --------- Vertical Bar Level Length Inclination Spacing Diameter Bond Stress (ft) (degrees) (ft) (in) Factor 1 30.0 15.0 2.0 1.25 2 30.0 15.0 4.9 1.25 3 30.0 15.0 5.0 1.25 4 30.0 15.0 5.0 1.25 5 30.0 15.0 5.0 1.25 6 30.0 15.0 5.0 1.25 7 30.0 15.0 5.0 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 File: MANOR7 Page - 3 MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) Toe 1.843 4.0 79.2 21.4 89.9 14.0 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 44.759 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) 5= 41.399 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) 6= 38.039 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) 7= 34.678 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 2 1.421 8.0 60.3 8.1 81.9 28.3 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 38.292 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 3 1.329 12.0 60.3 12.1 76.2 25.2 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 38.292 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) File: MANOR7 MINIMUM SAFETY FACTOR DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE BEHIND PLANE WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) UPPER FAILURE PLANE ANGLE LENGTH (deg) (ft) NODE 4 1.305 16.0 58.6 12.3 68.6 26.3 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 38.618 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 5 1.323 20.0 52.7 13.2 63.9 27.3 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 39.869 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 6 1.329 24.0 47.6 14.2 59.6 28.4 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 34.334 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 43.561 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 41.037 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) Page - 4 File: MANOR7 MINIMUM DISTANCE SAFETY BEHIND FACTOR WALL TOE (ft) LOWER FAILURE PLANE ANGLE LENGTH (deg) (ft) UPPER FAILURE PLANE ANGLE LENGTH (deg) (ft) Page - 5 NODE 7 1.394 28.0 51.3 44.8 89.9 0.0 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 26.840 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 38.811 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 40.168 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 8 1.435 32.0 42.3 26.0 53.8 21.7 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 12.774 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 23.887 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3 = 35.226 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 42.342 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 9 1.448 36.0 44.2 50.2 89.9 0.0 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 8.783 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 23.435 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3 = 38.386 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 41.864 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) File: MANOR7 MINIMUM SAFETY FACTOR DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE BEHIND PLANE WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) UPPER FAILURE PLANE ANGLE LENGTH (deg) (ft) Page - 6 NODE10 1.463 40.0 41.2 53.2 89.9 0.0 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 0.390 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 16.288 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3 = 32.510 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 4= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 5= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 6= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 7= 42.653 ksi (Punching Shear controls..) ***�**************************************�************************* * For Factor of Safety = 1.0 * * Maximum Average Reinforcement Working Force: * * 39.028 Kips/level * **�*******�**************************�****************************** File: MANOR3 Page - 1 ***+******************�**************************** * CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION * * ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER * * DIVISION OF MATERIALS AND FOUNDATIONS * * Office of Roadway Geotechnical Engineering * * Date: 04-04-2007 Time: 11:04:17 * *************************************************** Project Identification - MANOR VAIL - 3 ROWS --------- WALL GEOMETRY --------- Vertical Wall Height = 15.3 ft Wall Batter = 0.0 degree Angle Length (Deg) (Feet) First Slope from Wallcrest. = 0.0 100.0 Second Slope from ist slope. = 0.0 0.0 Third Slope from 2nd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Fourth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Fifth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Sixth Slope from 3rd slope. = 0.0 0.0 Seventh Slope Angle. = 0.0 --------- SLOPE BELOW THE WALL --------- There is NO SLOPE BELOW THE TOE of the wall --------- SURCHARGE --------- THE SURCHARGES IMPOSED ON THE SYSTEM ARE: Begin Surcharge - Distance from toe = 4.0 ft End Surcharge - Distance from toe = 24.0 ft Loading Intensity - Begin = 1000.0 psf/ft Loading Intensity - End = 1000.0 psf/ft --------- OPTION #1 --------- Factored Punching shear, Bond & Yield Stress are used. --------- SOIL PARAMETERS --------- Unit Friction Cohesion Bond* Coordinates of Boundary Soil Weight Angle Intercept Stress XSl YS1 XS2 YS2 Layer (Pcf) (Degree) (Psf) (Psi) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 125.0 32.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * Bond Stress also depends on BSF Factor in Option #5 when enabled. File: MANOR3 Page - 2 --------- WATER SURFACE --------- NO Water Table defined for this problem. --------- SEARCH LIMIT --------- The Search Limit is from 0.0 to 25.0 ft You have chosen NOT TO LIMIT the search of failure planes to specific nodes. --------- REINFORCEMENT PARAMETERS --------- Number of Reinforcement Levels Horizontal Spacing Yield Stress of Reinforcement Diameter of Grouted Hole Punching Shear = 3 = 7.0 ft = 45.0 ksi = 5.3 in = 40.0 kips ---------- (Varying Reinforcement Parameters) --------- Vertical Bar Level Length Inclination Spacing Diameter Bond Stress (ft) (degrees) (ft) (in) Factor 1 15.0 15.0 2.0 1.00 1.00 2 15.0 15.0 5.1 1.00 1.00 3 15.0 15.0 5.1 1.00 1.00 File: MANOR3 MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND , PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) Toe 2.312 2.5 78.5 12.5 89.9 3.1 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) UPPER FAILURE PLANE ANGLE LENGTH (deg) (ft) NODE 2 1.762 5.0 56.8 7.3 83.8 9.2 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 3 1.602 7.5 49.4 8.1 76.2 9.5 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 4 1.475 10.0 20.9 4.3 66.5 15.0 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 36.589 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 5 1.418 12.5 22.2 4.1 57.6 16.3 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 28.354 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 44.400 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) UPPER FAILURE PLANE ANGLE LENGTH (deg) (ft) NODE 6 1.383 15.0 18.8 4.8 52.7 17.3 Page - 3 2 = 37.831 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 7 1.386 17.5 23.6 3.8 44.5 19.6 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 13.522 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 37.134 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 8 1.384 20.0 20.9 4.3 40.7 21.1 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 5.849 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 2 = 32.033 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE 9 1.423 22.5 18.8 4.8 37.4 22.7 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 0.000 Ksi 2 = 27.227 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) MINIMUM DISTANCE LOWER FAILURE UPPER FAILURE SAFETY BEHIND PLANE PLANE FACTOR WALL TOE ANGLE LENGTH ANGLE LENGTH (ft) (deg) (ft) (deg) (ft) NODE10 1.532 25.0 17.0 5.2 34.5 24.3 Reinf. Stress at Level 1= 0.000 Ksi 2 = 22.690 Ksi (Pullout controls...) 3= 45.000 Ksi (Yield Stress controls.) **************��*****************�*******+****�****�***********+**** * For Factor of Safety = 1.0 * * Maximum Average Reinforcement Working Force: * * 20.418 Kips/level * ********��********�**�**********�****�********�******************* MANOR VAIL FACING DESIGN NAIL HEAD SERVICE LOAD Ff (p . 97) 0.7 Ka (SLOPE 8 SURCHARGE ACCOUN7ED 0.350 HEIGHT OF WALL (ft) 33 IN-SITU DENSITY ( 125 HORIZONTAL SPACING ft 7 VERTICAL SPACING (ft) 5 NAIL SERVICE LOAD KI s 35 FLEXURE STRENGTH VERTICAL DIRECTION HORIZONTAL DIRECTION As NEG s. in 0.99 As NEG) s. in) 1.46 As POS (s . in) 0.60 As POS) s. in 2.05 Mv (NEG #-inlin 2337 Mv NEG) #-in/in) 2453 Mv(POS) #-inlin) 1447 Mv POS tt-inlin 3349 NOM. HEAD Ki s 85 NOM. HEAD Ki s 59 DESIGN HEAD KI s) 59 ALL. NAIL HEAD Ki s 39 i WABL NAIL HEAD L REA R HEN E TIMA H VI L AD; PUNCHING SHEAR Cs 7able 4.2 . 89 2 D'c in) 13 Dc in 18 Ac s .in. � 254 A c s .In. 22 Vn KI s 52 NOM. HEAD (kips) 57 ALI. NAIL HEAD KI s 38 ALL WABLE NAIL HEAD L AD REATERTHEN ESTIMATED HEAD ERVICEi AD; HEN E, K-. r BEARING PLATE OUTSIDE DIA IN PL FOR ASSUMED PLATE SOIL NAIL NUT ANCHOR THICKNESS "t" NAIL LOAD (Kips) "dim a" (IN) "dim b" (IN) QNCHES) 52 1.8 1.38 0.5 CIRCUM NET CALC'D BEARING OF NET UNR LOAD ON NET SEE ROARK & ULT AREA (dim a+ 2t-dim b) NET AREA bearing BRG AREA AREA CG CIRCUM poissons YOUNG TABLE moment (1N^2) pressure (�n"2) (IN) (K/IN) ratio "Y' c9 24 c8 (in-Kip)!n 4.444 11.702 13.113 3.966 0.3 0.174 0.868 -2.92 DEVELOPED LENGTH VERTICAL BARS Lc/20 In) 3.0 15Db(in�___-- 7.5 7.5� . __—.. _____ __..._. d in 2.5 % TOTAL REIN. 0.40 l.w (in) 25 WALER BARS L in) 12 Ld = 1.7 Ldb 20 SPLICE LTH In 20 MESH 1. Ldb in) 4 Sw(re+2 in) 6 8 (in) 8 SPIJCE LTH n ' 8 I 2003 IECC REViEUUED BY JUN 1 8 20�7 COLORAD�J INSPECTION AvE�!CY c ec o ware Attachment I ersion 3.2.1 Permit # Permit Date Envelope Compliance Certificate Report Date: 05/09/07 Data fllename: S:\BGProjects\8050.00 Manor Vail Lodge Remodel & Expansion\Gen docs\new condos.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Title: Manor Vail New Condos Construction Site: Vail, CO Owner/Agent: Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): Vail, Colorado Climate Zone: 15 Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 9248 Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 44 Project Type: Addition Vertical Glazing / Wall Area Pct.: 39% Building Tvne Multifamily Floor Area 43700 Section 3: Requirements Checklist Climate-Specific Requirements: Component Name/Description Roof 1: All-Wood JoisURafter/Truss Exterior Wall 1: Wood Frame, Any Spacing Window 1: Wood Frame:Double Pane with Low-E, Clear, SHGC 0.51 Designer/Contractor: Zehren and Associates Gross Area Cavity Cont. Proposed Budget or R-Value R-Value U-Factor U-Factor Perimeter 43700 38.0 12.0 0.021 0.045 28221 19.0 0.0 0.068 0.064 10902 --- --- 0.310 0.520 (a) Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY, and are not code requirements. Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements: � 1. All joints and penetrations are caulked, gasketed or covered with a moisture vapor-permeable wrapping material installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. � 2. Windows, doors, and skylights certified as meeting leakage requirements. 3. Component R-values & U-factors labeled as certified. 4. Insulation installed according to manufacturer's instructions, in substantial contact with the surface being insulated, and in a manner that achieves the rated R-value without compressing the insulation. � 5. Stair, elevator shaft vents, and other dampers integral to the building envelope are equipped with motorized dampers. � 6. Cargo doors and loading dock doors are weather sealed. f� 7. Recessed lighting fixtures are: (i) Type IC rated and sealed or gasketed; or (ii) installed inside an appropriate air-tight assembly with a 0.5 inch clearance from combustible materials and with 3 inches clearance from insulation material. � 8. Building entrance doors have a vestibule and equipped with closing devices. _. r..,...,,.� _ _...�._.n.A._,.._. Manor Vail New Condos Page 1 of 2 n �M [.� Exceptions: Building entrances with revolving doors. Doors that open directly from a space less than 3000 sq. ft. in area. � 9. Vapor retarder installed. Section 4: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope system has been designed to meet the 2003 IECC requirements in COMcheck Ve ' nd to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. �� cSl('��,�I� 5•l6 •2cG� Principal Envelope D ise gner-Name 'g Date Manor Vail New Condos Page 2 of 2 2003 IECC Permit # Permit Date COMcheck Saftware Version 3.2.1 Lighting Compliance Certificate Report Date: 03/14/07 Data filename: S:\BGProjects\8050.00 Manor Vail Lodge Remodel & Expansion\Gen docs\new condos.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Title: Manor Vail New Condos Construction Site: Vail, CO Owner/Agent: Section 2: General Information Building Use Description by: Activity Type Project Type: Addition Activitv Tvpelsl Hotel Function Section 3: Requirements Checklist Floor Area 43700 Interior Lighting: ❑ 1. Total actual watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts. Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies 56810 3876 YES ❑ 2. Exit signs 5 Watts or less per side. Designer/Contractor: Beaudin Ganze Consulting Engineers Exterior Lighting: ❑ 3. Efficacy greater than 45 lumens/W. Exceptions: Specialized lighting highlighting features of historic buildings; signage; safety or security lighting; low-voltage landscape lighting. Controls, Switching, and Wiring: ❑ 4. Independent controls for each space (switch/occupancy sensor). Exceptions: Areas designated as security or emergency areas that must be continuously illuminated. Lighting in stainvays or corridors that are elements of the means of egress. ❑ 5. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room. ❑ 6. Individual dwelling units separately metered. ❑ 7. Each space provided with a manual control to provide uniform light reduction by at least 50%. Exceptions: Only one luminaire in space; An occupant-sensing device controls the area; The area is a corridor, storeroom, restroom, public lobby or guest room; Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts/sq.ft. ❑ 8. Automatic lighting shutoff control in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.ft. Manor Vail New Condos Page 3 of 10 ❑ 9. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights. Exceptions: Lighting intended for 24 hour use. ❑ 10. Tandem wired one-lamp and three-lamp ballasted luminaires (No single-lamp ballasts). Exceptions: Electronic high-frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair. Section 4: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2003 IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck Version .2.1 and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. "'� t, � "7 f L � f U�Z `��-c � Principal Lighting Designer-Name Signatur Date !V� �� J � ;. 6�'�14�. , s:,. .,,�� i��'// �i� �' ;M1' :�� e`\`,� ��"n;��tiau��a��ti Manor Vail New Condos Page 4 of 10 2003 IECC Permit # Permit Date COMcheck Saftware Version 3.2.1 Lighting Application Worksheet Report Date: Data filename: S:\BGProjects\8050.00 Manor Vail Lodge Remodel & Expansion\Gen docs\new condos.cck Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D Area Category Floor Area Allowed Allowed Watts (ft2) Watts / ft2 (B x C) Hotel Function 43700 1.3 56810 Total Allowed Watts = 56810 Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Linear Fluorescent 1: D1: 48" T8 32W / Electronic Compact Fluorescent 1: A1: Twin Tube 13W / Electronic Section 3: Compliance Calculation B C D Lamps/ # of Fixture Fixture Fixtures Watt. 1 87 32 1 84 13 Total Actual Watts = E (C X D) 2784 1092 3876 If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Actual Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies. Total Allowed Watts = 56810 Total Actual Watts = 3876 Project Compliance = 52934 r- . , .: .•- Manor Vail New Condos Page 5 of 10 2003 IECC Permit # Permit Date C4Mcheck Saftware Version 3.2.1 Mechanical Compliance Certificate Report Date: 03/14/07 Data filename: S:\BGProjects\8050.00 Manor Vail Lodge Remodel & ExpansionlGen docs\new condos.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Title: Manor Vail New Condos Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Vail, CO Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): Vail, Colorado Climate Zone: 15 Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 9248 Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 44 Project Type: Addition Section 3: Mechanical Systems List Designer/Contractor: Beaudin Ganze Consulting Engineers n i System Tvoe & Description 59 Fan Coils FC-1 - FC-12: Heating: Hydronic or Steam Coil, Hot Water / Cooling: Hydronic Coil, Capacity <65 kBtu/h, Water-Cooled Condenser / Single Zone 4 Fan Coils FC-13 & FC-14: Fan Coils FC-13 & FC-14 2 Chiller CH-1, 2: Cooling: Water Chiller, Capacity <50 tons, Condenser Air-Cooled, Standard Centrifugal Chiller: leaving chilled water temperature = 44.0 deg. F, entering condenser water temperature = 85.0, condenser flow rate = 3 gpm/ton 1 Instantaneous Water Heater 1: Service Water Heater w/ Circulation Pump Section 4: Requirements Checklist Requirements Specific To: Fan Coils FC-1 - FC-12 : ❑ 1. Balancing and pressure test connections on all hydronic terminal devices ❑ 2. Separate hot and cold water supply and returns ❑ 3. Multiple boilers must have automatic controls that sequence operation with load ❑ 4. Single boiler >500 kBtu/h input capacity must have a multistaged or modulating burner ❑ 5. Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling controls must have: a) 15 degrees F deadband where boiler and chiller can not operate, b) allow operation in either heating or cooling for at least 4 hrs. and c) prevent difference between heating and cooling set points greater than 30 degrees F Requirements Specific To: Fan Coils FC-13 8 FC-14 : ❑ 1. Balancing and pressure test connections on all hydronic terminal devices ❑ 2. Integrated air economizer required ❑ 3. Separate hot and cold water supply and returns O 4. Multiple boilers must have automatic controls that sequence operation with load ❑ 5. Single boiler >500 kBtu/h input capacity must have a multistaged or modulating burner ❑ 6. Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling controls must have: a) 15 degrees F deadband where boiler and chiller can not operate, b) allow operation in either heating or cooling for at least 4 hrs. and c) prevent difference between heating and Manor Vail New Condos Page 6 of 10 cooling set points greater than 30 degrees F Requirements Specific To: Chiller CH-1, 2: ❑ 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Chiller: COP >= 2.80, IPLV >= 2.80 Requirements Specific To: Instantaneous Water Heater 1 ❑ 1. 1-in. pipe insulation on circulation systems ❑ 2. Automatic on/off control required for circulating systems ❑ 3. Gas Instantaneous Water Heater efficiency >= 0.62 EF Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable: ❑ 1. Load calculations per 2001 ASHRAE Fundamentals ❑ 2. Plant equipment and system capacity no greater than needed to meet loads - Exception: Standby equipment automatically off when primary system is operating - Exception: Multiple units controlled to sequence operation as a function of load ❑ 3. Minimum one temperature control device per system ❑ 4. Minimum one humidity control device per installed humidification/dehumidification system ❑ 5. Thermostatic controls has 5 degrees F deadband - Exception: Thermostats requiring manual changeover between heating and cooling ❑ 6. Automatic Controls: Setback to 55 degrees F(heat) and 85 degrees F(cool); 7-day clock, 2-hour occupant override, 10-hour backup ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 13. ❑ 14. ❑ 15. ❑ 16. ❑ 17. ❑ 18. ❑ 19. ❑ 20. - Exception: Continuously operating zones - Exception: 2 kW demand or less, submit calculations Automatic shut-off dampers on exhaust systems and supply systems with airflow >3,000 cfm Outside-air source for ventilation; system capable of reducing OSA to required minimum R-5 supply and return air duct insulation in unconditioned spaces R-8 supply and return air duct insulation outside the building R-8 insulation between ducts and the building exterior when ducts are part of a building assembly - Exception: Ducts located within equipment - Exception: Ducts with interior and exterior temperature difference not exceeding 15 degrees F. Ducts sealed - longitudinal seams on rigid ducts; transverse seams on all ducts; UL 181A or 1816 tapes and mastics - Exception: Continuously welded and locking-type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at static pressures less than 2 inches w.g. pressure classification Mechanical fasteners and sealants used to connect ducts and air distribution equipment Hot water pipe insulation: 1 in. for pipes <=1.5 in. and 2 in. for pipes >1.5 in. Chilled water/refrigerant/brine pipe insulation: 1 in. for pipes <=1.5 in. and 1.5 in. for pipes >1.5 in. Steam pipe insulation: 1.5 in. for pipes <=1.5 in. and 3 in. for pipes >1.5 in. - Exception: Piping within HVAC equipment - Exception: Fluid temperatures between 55 and 105 degrees F - Exception: Fluid not heated or cooled - Exception: Runouts <4 ft in length Operation and maintenance manual provided to building owner Balancing devices provided in accordance with IMC 603.15 Chilled water distribution systems >=600 kBtu/h must have one of the following: a) controls that reset supply water temperature by 25% of supply/return delta T b) mechanical or electrical adjustable-speed pump drive(s) c) two-way valves at all heating coils d) multiple-stage pumps e) other system controls that reduce pump flow by at least 50% based on load - calculations required Newly purchased service water heating equipment meets the efficiency requirements Water heater temperature controls: 110 degrees F for dwelling units or 90 degrees F for other occupancies Chilled water distribution systems >=300 kBtu/h must have one of the following: a) controls that reset supply water temperature by 25% of supply/return delta T b) mechanical or electrical adjustable-speed pump drive(s) c) two-way valves at all heating coils d) multiple-stage pumps e) other system controls that reduce pump flow by at least 50% based on load - calculations required Stair and elevator shaft vents are equipped with motorized dampers Three-pipe systems not used Section 5: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consiste specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mech to meet the 2003 IECC requirements in COMcheck Version 3. . and to com ly i �i Requirements Checklist. � -, l�1�� r.S . ^ Principal Mechanical Designer-Name Signature �� , �� rwith the building plans, �I systems have been designed requirements in the � � �(0 7 Date Manor Vail New Condos Page 7 of 10 2003 IECC COMcheck Software Version 3.2.1 Mechanical Requirements Description Report Date: Data filename: S:\BGProjects\8050.00 Manor Vail Lodge Remodel & Expansion\Gen docs\new condos.cck The following list provides more detailed descriptions of the requirements in Section 4 of the Mechanical Compliance Certificate. Requirements Specific To: Fan Coils FC-1 - FC-12 : 1. Hydronic heating and cooling coils must be equipped with a way to pressure test connections and measure and balance water flow and pressure. 2. Fan system terminal units must have separate hot and cold water supply and return piping. 3. Multiple packaged boilers must have automatic controls capable of sequencing the operation of the boilers. 4. A single boiler with >500 kBtu/h input capacity must have a multistaged or modulating burner. 5. Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling controls must:a) allow a deadband between changeover from one mode (heating/cooling) to the other of at least 15 degrees F outside temperaturesb) allow operation in one mode (heating/cooling) for at least 4 hours before changing over to the other modec) allow heating and cooling supply temperatures at the changeover point to be no more than 30 degrees F apart. Requirements Specific To: Fan Coils FC-13 & FC-14 : 1. Hydronic heating and cooling coils must be equipped with a way to pressure test connections and measure and balance water flow and pressure. 2. An integrated air economizer is required for individual cooling systems over 65 kBtu/h in the selected climate. An integrated economizer allows simultaneous operation of outdoor-air and mechanical cooling. 3. Fan system terminal units must have separate hot and cold water supply and return piping. 4. Multiple packaged boilers must have automatic controls capable of sequencing the operation of the boilers. 5. A single boiler with >500 kBtu/h input capacity must have a multistaged or modulating burner. 6. Two-pipe changeover heating/cooling controls must:a) allow a deadband between changeover from one mode (heating/cooling) to the other of at least 15 degrees F outside temperaturesb) allow operation in one mode (heating/cooling) for at least 4 hours before changing over to the other modec) allow heating and cooling supply temperatures at the changeover point to be no more than 30 degrees F apart. Requirements Specific To: Chiller CH-1, 2: 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by the ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Chiller: COP >= 2.80, IPLV >= 2.80 Requirements Specific To: Instantaneous Water Heater 1: 1. Piping for the specified circulating service hot water system must be insulated with a minimum of 1-in. insulation having a conductivity no >0.28 Btu-in/(h-ft2-degrees F). 2. Circulating service hot water systems must have a time switch control that can automatically turn off the system during unoccupied hours. 3. Service water heating equipment used solely for heating potable water, pool heaters, and hot water storage tanks must meet the following miniumum efficiency: Gas Instantaneous Water Heater efficiency >= 0.62 EF Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable: 1. Design heating and cooling loads for the building must be determined using procedures in the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals or an approved equivalent calculation procedure. 2. All equipment and systems must be sized to be no greater than needed to meet calculated loads. A single piece of equipment providing both heating and cooling must satisfy this provision for one function with the capacity for the other function as small as possible, within available equipment options. Manor Vail New Condos Page 8 of 10 . - Exception: The equipment and/or system capacity may be greater than calculated loads for standby purposes. Standby ' equipment must be automatically controlled to be off when the primary equipment and/or system is operating. - Exception: Multiple units of the same equipment type whose combined capacities exceed the calculated load are allowed if they are provided with controls to sequence operation of the units as the load increases or decreases. 3. Each heating or cooling system serving a single zone must have its own temperature control device. 4. Each humidification system must have its own humidity control device. 5. Thermostats controlling both heating and cooling must be capable of maintaining a 5 degrees F deadband (a range of temperature where no heating or cooling is provided). - Exception: Deadband capability is not required if the thermostat does not have automatic changeover capability between heating and cooling. 6. The system or zone control must be a programmable thermostat or other automatic control meeting the following criteria:a) capable of setting back temperature to 55 degrees F during heating and setting up to 85 degrees F during coolingb) capable of automatically setting back or shutting down systems during unoccupied hours using 7 different day schedulesc) have an accessible 2-hour occupant overrided) have a battery back-up capable of maintaining programmed settings for at least 10 hours without power. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on thermostats that control systems serving areas that operate continuously. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on systems with total energy demand of 2 kW (6,826 Btu/h) or less. 7. Outdoor-air supply systems with design airflow rates >3,000 cfm of outdoor air and all exhaust systems must have dampers that are automatically closed while the equipment is not operating. 8. The system must supply outside ventilation air as required by Chapter 4 of the International Mechanical Code. If the ventilation system is designed to supply outdoor-air quantities exceeding minimum required levels, the system must be capable of reducing outdoor-air flow to the minimum required levels. 9. Air ducts must be insulated to the following levels:a) Supply and return air ducts for conditioned air located in unconditioned spaces (spaces neither heated nor cooled) must be insulated with a minimum of R-5. Unconditioned spaces include attics, crawl spaces, unheated basements, and unheated garages.b) Supply and return air ducts and plenums must be insulated to a minimum of R-8 when located outside the building.c) When ducts are located within exterior components (e.g., floors or roofs), minimum R-8 insulation is required only between the duct and the building exterior. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required on ducts located within equipment. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required when the design temperature difference between the interior and exterior of the duct or plenum does not exceed 15 degrees F. 10. All joints, longitudinal and transverse seams, and connections in ductwork must be securely sealed using weldments; mechanical fasteners with seals, gaskets, or mastics; mesh and mastic sealing systems; or tapes. Tapes and mastics must be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 181A or UL 181B. - Exception: Continuously welded and locking-type longitudinal joints and seams on ducts operating at static pressures less than 2 inches w.g. pressure classification. 11. Mechanical fasteners and seals, mastics, or gaskets must be used when connecting ducts to fans and other air distribution equipment, including multiple-zone terminal units. 12. All pipes serving space-conditioning systems must be insulated as follows: Hot water piping for heating systems: 1 in. for pipes <=1 1/2-in. nominal diameter 2 in. for pipes >1 1/2-in. nominal diameter. Chilled water, refrigerant, and brine piping systems: 1 in. insulation for pipes <=1 1/2-in. nominal diameter 1 1/2 in, insulation for pipes >1 1/2-in. nominal diameter. Steam piping: 1 1/2 in. insulation for pipes <=1 1/2-in. nominal diameter 3 in. insulation for pipes >1 1/2-in. nominal diameter. - Exception: Pipe insulation is not required for factory-installed piping within HVAC equipment. - Exception: Pipe insulation is not required for piping that conveys fluids having a design operating temperature range between 55 degrees F and 105 degrees F. - Exception: Pipe insulation is not required for piping that conveys fluids that have not been heated or cooled through the use of fossil fuels or electric power. - Exception: Pipe insulation is not required for runout piping not exceeding 4 ft in length and 1 in. in diameter between the control valve and HVAC coil. 13. Operation and maintenance documentation must be provided to the owner that includes at least the following information:a) equipment capacity (input and output) and required maintenance actionsb) equipment operation and maintenance manualsc) HVAC system control maintenance and calibration information, including wiring diagrams, schematics, and control sequence descriptions; desired or field-determined set points must be permanently recorded on control drawings, at control devices, or, for digital control systems, in programming commentsd) complete narrative of how each system is intended to operate. 14. Each supply air outlet or diffuser and each zone terminal device (such as VAV or mixing box) must have its own balancing device. Acceptable balancing devices include adjustable dampers located within the ductwork, terminal devices, and supply air diffusers. 15. Chilled water distribution systems with total system capacities of 600 kBtu/h and greater must have controls that:a) automatically reset the chilled water supply temperature, based on cooling load, by at least 25% of the design supply-to-return water temperature difference orb) reduce pump flow by at least 50% of design flow rate by using- adjustable-speed drive(s) on pump(s)- multiple-stage pumps allowing at least 1/2 of the total pump horsepower to be automatically turned off- control valves designed to modulate or step down and close as a function of load- other approved means (supporting documentation or calculations must be submitted). 16. Service water heating equipment must meet minimum Federal efficiency requirements included in the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, which meet or exceed ASHRAE 90.1 Code. New service water heating equipment can be assumed to meet these requirements. 17. Water-heating equipment must be provided with controls that allow the user to set the water temperature to 110 degrees F for dwelling units and 90 degrees F for other occupancies. Controls must limit output temperatures of lavatories in public facility restrooms to 110 degrees F. 18. Chilled water space-cooling systems with a capacity exceeding 300 kBtu/h supplying chilled water for comfort conditioning Manor Vail New Condos Page 9 of 10 systems must include controls that automatically reset supply water temperatures by representative building loads (including return water temperature) or by outside air temperature. Exceptions: - Where the supply temperature reset controls cannot be implemented without causing improper operation of heating, cooling, humidification, or dehumidification systems. - Hydronic systems that use variable flow to reduce pumping energy. 19. Stair and elevator shaft vents must be equipped with motorized dampers capable of being automatically closed during normal building operation and interlocked to open as required by fire and smoke detection systems. All gravity outdoor air supply and exhaust hoods, vents, and ventilators must be equipped with motorized dampers that will automatically shut when the spaces served are not in use. Exceptions: - Gravity (non-motorized) dampers are acceptable in buildings less than three stories in height above grade. - Ventilation systems serving unconditioned spaces. 20. Hydronic systems that use a common return system for both hot water and chilled water must not be used. Manor Vail New Condos Page 10 of 10 � REVIEWED �Y J U N 1 8 20�7 COLORAAGEN�CY ECTION Apri19, 2007 Zehren & Associates, Inc. PO Box 1976 Avon, CO 81620 Attn: Mr. Brian Sipes Monroe 8� Newell Engineers, Inc. Re: Manor Vail Condominiums, Building Permit #B06-0191 595 East Valley Drive, Vail, Colorado (M&N #6500) Dear Brian, Attachment J Vail, Colorado llenver, Colorado Frisco. Colorado The following are our responses to the structural plan review comments by Colorado Inspection Agency, dated April 4, 2007. Fire Resistive Construction: 56. The firewalls shown in the construction documents are stable to support themselves in the event of a fire on one side or another for a period of two hours or longer. Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. has revised floor and roof connections to the firewalls so that collapse of floors and roofs on one side of the wall will not destabilize the wall. See sheets 56.6 and 56.8 for details of framing connections. The assembly of existing firewalls will be observed during construction and their stability confirmed at that time, because documents showing construction materials of existing framing are not available. A 2007 Platinum Corporate Sponsor of �" , � Colorado A Component of The American Institute ot Architects www.monroe-�ewelLcom 70 I3enchrnark Road • Suite 204 • Y.O. 13ox 1597 • Avon, Colorado 81620 (970) 949-7768 • FAX (970) 949-4054 • email: avonC�monroe-newelLcom Structural Comments: 26. The pile cap reinforcement has been revised in detail 6/S3.3 to match the previously submitted calculations. Diagonal shear reinforcement has been added across the shear plane to engage the 48" depth for the outer compression piles. 55. The calculations for the epoxy anchors have been revised with corrected edge distance and spacing reduction factors per the 2006 Hilti Tech guide. The epoxy anchors shown in details 8, 9, 10/53.3 are structurally adequate. See the attached calculations. 57. The new structure, including the x-brace, is supported by the existing foundation wall. The X-brace and column loads have been revised for Zone A wind loading on the bridge between buildings B and D. See the attached calculations. The design for the X-brace is structurally adequate. The existing foundation will be verified and reviewed during demolition. 85. The concrete pedestal ties in detail 3/53.0 have been revised to comply with ACI 318, section 7.10. 104. A deflection gap has been added between the top of the non-bearing stud wall and the bottom of the steel beam in detail 15/54.2. 108. Section 1/54.1 has been revised. The column bracing has been designed for 2% of the maximum column axial load. See the attached calculations. 141. The calculations have been revised using an effective bearing area of the 8" end wall thickness, plus 8" from the 45 degree strut for the concrete topping in compression against the core walls. The concrete topping is structurally adequate to transfer the load. Compression collectors are not required. See the attached calculations. 146. The wind calculations far the B/D bridge have been revised using Zone A edge zone pressures. The load path has been verified to transfer these wind forces from the roof plywood and floor concrete into the steel beams and embed plates. Blocking, nails, and Simpson clips have been added to detail 14/54.5 to transfer the wind forces. The longitudinal seismic forces have been calculated and the load path has been verified. See the attached calculations. Calculations have been provided for the wind and seismic forces at the bridge between E and F. Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. 2 Manor Vail Condominiums April 9, 2007 (M&N #6500) . 1 162. Roof plan note #11 has been revised. 182. Detail 7/54.5 has been revised to show the connection of the top plate to the steel framing. The HUC hangers have been deleted from the plans and the steel tube framing will have a welded connection instead. In addition, detail 7/54.5 has been revised to show a more constructible channel connection to the precast care wall. 184. See revised detail 16/54.5. Lag-bolt penetration has been confirmed. The rim board connecting to existing joist framing has been detailed. New rim board members will not be exposed to the elements. Waterproofing and flashing will be installed. We believe that the above responses satisfy the requirements of the plan review comments, dated Apri14, 2007. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Very truly yours, MONROE & NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. �� Peter Monroe, P.E. Principal Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. April 9, 2007 3 Manor Vail Condominiums (M&N #6500) SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT .�-�Pr- .,�� _ �__ ��rado��Ins�� ecfi .�� AGENCY Attachment K n l" ► , � r:-: . .-- = i i i iL V 1 L{I v�.. #.., 't;c� 1 ;. 1186 Chambers Ave./ P.O. Box 1618 Eagle, QO 816� 1 Job Name: v, �o� - a1°� 1 Phone:970-328-1970 Fax:970-328-1791 � ..__ .._1 � �v � (To applicants of project requ�rmg Special Inspec�'d��b�r Testin� per Section 1701 of the IBC) The owner or his/her representative, on`�fie a�vic�„ofth�res��ons�b�e�Pro�ect Engineer or Architect, shall complete, sign and submit a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement and Structural Tests Scheduled to Colorado Inspection Agency for review and approval. Original signatures are required on both pages; photocopied or fa�ced signatures are not acceptable. The owner and his/her general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection or Testing: 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspection or Testing agency for items listed. 2. Only the testing laboratory should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to Colorado Inspection Agency by the Testing agency on a weekly basis. 4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to Colorado Inspection Agency for review and approval. 5. The special inspector is responsible to Colorado Inspection Agency Building Official immediate notification of any concerns and/or problems encountered. 6. It is the responsibility of the contactor to review the Colorado Inspection Agency approved plans for additional inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. A pre-construction conference at the job site is recommended to review special inspection procedures. 7. The special inspector shall use only Colorado Inspection Agency approved drawings. 8. The special inspector's field report must be left on site for review by Colorado Inspection Agency staff prior to required Colorado Inspection Agency inspections. BEFORE OCCUPANCY WILL BE GRANTED: The special inspection agency shall submit a statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. A copy of the statement shall be maintained at the job site for the Building Inspector's review priar to final inspection. Acknowledgement: 1 Owner: �,QI�C. J�rs-!� Special Inspection Agency: Project Arch/ Eng: Contractor: (Print) .C..�. ,�/ �-�/G �� _ lti . - .� (Signature) (Date) vf�� '�� `��n��SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE AGENCY 1186 Chambers Ave./ P.O. Box 1618 Eagle, CO 81631 Phone: 970-328-1970 Fvc: 970-328-1791 Project Name: Owner's Name: Testing/Inspection Agency: _ 1G�e,�C Jo1�� (Print) (Print) (Signature) Permit #: ��""' OI I — s/2i1o7 (Date) (Date) Hereby certifies that the Testing/Inspection Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and inspections during construction, as checked below, to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code. Prior to final inspection, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work performed were reported. Any items checked but not tested or inspected will be noted and explained. Whenever any designated items on the list are ready for sampling, testing, or inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to give timely notice to the Inspection Agency so that the required services may be performed. R�ORCED STEEL: Tensile & Bend, one set per heat per � tons Inspection of Placement _� Inspection of Welding MAS NRY: Prelim. Acceptance Tests (Masonry Units, Wall Prisms) _� Subsequent Tests (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) �nspection of Grouting nspection of Placement and Grouting PRECAST CONCRETE: Reinforcing Tests Inspection of Reinforcing Placement Tendon Tests Inspection of Tendon Placement Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching Inspection of Panel Attachment & Inserts Compression Tests Inspection of Stressing/ Transfer PILING, CAISSONS, CAPS, TIES: � Inspection of Reinforcing Placement �Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching Specify other tests, inspections or special instructions required. UNDERPINNING: Inspection of Steel Fabrication Inspection of Reinforcing & Forms Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Tiebacks STRUCTURAL STEEL: Sample & Test (List specific members below) ��Shop Identification & Welding Inspection _�Shop Ultrasonic Inspection Shop Radiography _�Field Welding Inspection ✓Field Bolting Inspection ✓Field Ultrasonic Inspection Field Radiography �Metal Deck Welding Inspection ASPHALTIC CONCRETE: Mix Designs Inspection of Batch Plant Core/Test Field Inspection Suitability Tests INSULATING CONCRETE: Sample & Test Unit Weights FIRF,�ROOFING: �,� Inspection and Placement FILL MATERIAL: �Acceptance Tests Moisture-Density Determination �� Field Density ROOFING: Inspection of Placement Sample Test STRUCTURAL WOOD: Inspection of Fabrication ✓Inspection of Truss Joist Fabrication �LSample & Test Components Inspection of Glu Lam Fabrication � ♦, MAY-�9-2007 04:35PM FRO�-KCE INC 3039880204 T-683 P.002/003 F-993 S�'�C�A,i, �NSPECT�ON AND TE$7'IN�G ,A,�'.�rREEMEI�I�T � ---- --...__..__ _ ,rob 1V�n1e: �*l�pR. V,�•11..r-- Attacllinent K . ,Tob Address: u � �I — A�eN�y Permic Number: O�c+ — ��_�___ I IB6 Chambers Ave,/ P,O. Bux 7G18 Eegle, Co 8�G31 I�hone:970.338•197d C�x:970-326-1991 (To applfcan�� ofprojoots requuing SpeciaJ Inspeetiun or T'estu�� per Sectia� 1701 ofthe IBC) The owner o� l�is/her repl�asentative, on the advice of [Ue responsible Projec[ �ngineer or ArchitecC, shall cornplete, sign and subrnit a cop�� of ibc: Speaial Inspection Agreein��lt �nd Structurul Cests Sel�ecluled to Colorado lnspaction Agancy for revie�v and approval, Ori�inal si�t�atu��cs ure requii^ed an hoth pages; phoeoaopied or• faxed signanires are not acceptable. Tllc ownor and his/har generaf coniractor, where npplicabie, sl�oll a13o �cltnowledga the fallowin6 condieions applicable to Special Inspection or Tespn�; 1. Cot3tractoi• is responsiUle for prop�r notifieacion W'the Inspeacion or Testfng a�aiacy for item9 listed. ' 2, Only [he tesCin� laboracory siloutd take sample9 and transUort diem ro ihair laboratory. � 3. Gopies of all laboratay repptt�c nnd inapections a��e tn.be sent di�etiy Lo Golorado tiispection A�ency by ihe Testin� ag�n,cy oit a weEkl}� basiR. 4. Insp�cpon Agency to submit nan�es �nd qualifibaiions of on-si[o special 'u�spcctors co Calorado Inspection Agency for review and approv�l. 5. The �pecial inspecior ts responsible to Cplorado Inspeetion Age►�cy I3t►ildin� Offieit�l immadiate . nu�i�iaati�n of a�tiy concei'�ts and/ur probl�n►s �n�u�u��rea. ' G. � It is the responsibility of d�e con�actor to review ti�e Colarado Inspectio� A,gency approved plans for � additional inspection or tasting tequirements tha.t may be noted, A pre-eonstruc�ion conference at thc job sitc is reeommended to rc:view special ins�ection proeedur�:;. 7, Tl�e Special inspectar sball use only Colorado lnspe�tion A��ncy appcaved dra��u�gs. S. �Tlz� spc:cipl inspoctor's field report must be left on site f�r revi��a� L�y Color�da 4tS�eeuon A�cncy staff prior co require�l Calorado ]nsp�ct9on A�Cncy iiispeeCioiis, BEFORE OCCUPANCY W1Li, BE GRA'�TED: T'he speciai insp�ction a�e»cy sl�a[I submie a ctateniant thae all itetns requfrin� te9ting and inspcction wet� fulfilled and reportecl. 'I`hose icems not tested and/or ins�eeted �hall be nated in this staecment. � copy oFtl�e stacemont s1�a11 be maf�ltained nt the job �itc for tlie Building Inspeclor'S revir:w pri4r to rn�.l ins�ectia�. . Acltnow�ledgem.ent: Ownor: V�,��,,�, S pccial Inspection ''J AgCncy: i��t,4►AM rt�� ,D�C.HI..K„�,1� project /lrch/ Eitg:'��. M��2�_ �- � z contrg�to�: (Prinl) 3�21/p� ��.��J D'i � �-�/a 3t (Pa ) Town of Vaii oF FICE C�PY � MAY-�9-2007 04:36PM PROM-KCE iNC � � SPECIAL A{'i[NiY 3039890204 T-693 P.003/003 F-893 II�SF�CTXON AND TE�T:(NG SCH�DULE 1186 Chembers Ave./ P.O. Box 1618 Hag�e, CO 81631 Phone: 970•328•1970 Fex: 970 328-1791 Project Name: Permit #: B06-0191 Owner's Name: ��rt�K. ,��.r.5� _� _ $— 3 �' o ? (Print) Signa �re) (Date) Testing/Inspection W� ��ip�. i�i�, Ko�er►L�irJ �, /J�_ � J��.�V.LT � z 0 Ag�ney: Knechlein Cn�sulTin�Engincers. lnc. �;r..Q,rhr�r �� f1/ (Print) (Signature) ate) Hereby certifies that the T�stin€/lnspectiosi Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and inspeeciens during construction, as cheeked below, ro satisfy all nppl9cable portions of the Building Code. Prior to final inspection, ehe Inspection Agancy sl�al! suUmtt a statement that ell icems of designated worlc performed were reported. Any items checked but no� testad or insp�ccad will be noted and explained. Wh�:never any design�ted items on the list ace ready for sampling, testing, or inspection, it shap be the responsibility of che contraetor lo give timely notice to the lnspection Agency so that tho required services may be performed. REINFORCTD 9TC�L: Tcnsile & Bend, ona set per heat per _ tons X Iuspoc�ion ofPlnc�mznt Inspcction of Welding MASONRY: Prclim. Accaptance Tests (Masonry Units, Wal f Prisms) _ C� Subscqucnt Teat:s (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisn�s) Inspccrioa of Groutins �C_ Tnsnection ofPlacemem a�id Grouting PRECA9T CONCR�T�: Reinforcing Tescs lnspoclion ofReinforcing Placemcnt Tendon Tests lnypection of'I'endon Placcmcnt _ in�pection ofConcreta Placcmcnt lnspec[ion of Concrcce Bacahing in�pectlon of Pancl Attuchmzn� & InceRs Compression Tesls Inspccdon of Stresa[ng/ Transfer PILTNG, CAISSONS, CAPS, TT�a: X Inspaclion af Rei��forcing Placcment X Inspection oPConcrcte Placcmcnt Inspcclion o!'Concreto Batching Speeify other �esrs, irupec�lnns or specrnl instructions regurred UNDERPIIVNINGs Tnspzetion of Steel I'abricatfon Inspcction ofReinforcing 8c Forms Inspeetion of Concrete Placemenc Inspcetion ofTieboaks STYiUCTURAL STEEI,: Semplr Bc Tzst (List &peci2ic members below) X Shop Idcntification & Welding Tns�section X Shop Ultr�onia lnspeclion Shop Radiograph�• X Ficld Wclding inspcction ,,,,, C� i'ield Bolting TnsK�ection X rield Ultra.5onic InspectJon „ Pield Radiograph� X Meta1 Decic Weidfng 4nspcction ASPI�TALTIC CONCRF.TE: Mix Designs Inspection of Bs�tch Pf4nt Corc/Tcst Field [nspccdon Suita6llity Tcsts INSULATING CaNCR1ETC; Sample Bc.1'ast Unit Weishts FIREPROOFINC: X Insnection and PJ��ceroens �1LL MATERLIL: X Accaptpnce Test,� X Moistur�Densiry De�ermination X Field Density ROOFIIV G: Inspection ofPlacement St►mple Test STRUCTURAL WO01>: Inspection of Fubrtcation X lnspection of1'russ 7oist Fnbrication )C Somple Sc Test Componenu 7nspcction of Glu Lam Pabrication ♦, e PROFESSIONAL STAFF William H. Koechlein: PRESIDENT Bill's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to; reviewing project documents, organizing the other staff inembers, providing in-house and on-site consultations, and coordinating the completion of the projects. Scott B. Myers: SENIOR ENGINEER Scott's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to; performing construction testing, coordinating necessary laboratory work, report and figure preparation, and design recommendations. Jessica E. Brown: STAFF ENGINEER Jessica's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to; performing construction testing, coordinating necessary laboratory work, report and figure preparation, and design recommendations. Kerry Keehn: OPERATIONS/PROJECT MANAGER Kerry's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to, organizing and coordinating field construction testing, preparing proposals for construction testing projects, overseeing of laboratory work and equipment, and preparing final construction testing documents. John Medina: FIELD/LABORATORY SUPERVISOR John's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to, supervising the field/laboratory services, as well as, performing concrete tests, performing asphalt compaction tests, performing subgrade compaction tests performing other construction testing, and performing laboratory work. Don R. Sneed: FIELD ENGINEER Don's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to, performing concrete tests, performing asphalt compaction tests, performing subgrade compaction tests performing other construction testing, and performing laboratory work. Faafetai "Ty" Ilaoa: FIELD ENGINEER Ty's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to, performing concrete tests, performing asphalt compaction tests, performing subgrade compaction tests performing other construction testing, and performing laboratory work. Norman "Reed" Vaughan: FIELD ENGINEER Reed's responsibilities would include, but are not limited to, performing concrete tests, performing asphalt compaction tests, performing subgrade compaction tests performing other construction testing, and performing laboratory work. Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 William H. Koechlein. P.E. President LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX EDUCATION: University of Missouri School of Mines & Metallurgy - BSCE 1964 University of Missouri at Rolla - MSCE 1968 REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer — Colorado Professional Engineer — Wyoming Professional Engineer — Utah CONTINUING EDUCATION Instructar for ICC since 1989 AFFILIATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers, Member Chi Epsilon CAGE — Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Mr. Koechlein is President of Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc, which was founded in 1985. He has over 35 years of experience as a Geotechnical Engineer. His experience has included road, residential/multi-family, commercial, hotels, hospitals, industrial, mining, ski resorts, mountain construction, and large commercial projects. More recent emphasis has been as an expert for analysis of failures on over 25 projects for mountain construction claims and front range construction claims. Prior to establishing Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Mr. Koechlein worked for several large consulting firms on a variety of domestic and foreign projects that required traveling throughout the United States and overseas in the Middle East. He has worked in Colorado for over 25 years. Mr. Koechlein's design experience includes site evaluations, expansive soils, collapsing soils, foundation systems evaluation, ground water control, braced excavations, retaining walls, slope stability, drilled pier foundations, pile foundations, vibration of foundations, and special foundation systems. He is solution oriented and, therefore, open to exploring ways of making a project economical as well as feasible. Scott B. Myers, P.E. Senior Engineer Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX EDUCATION: University of Colorado, Boulder- BSCE - 1992 University of Colorado, Boulder- MSCE - 1994 REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer - Colorado AFFILIATIONS: Chi Epsilon Tau Beta Pi CAGE — Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification: Soils Field Testing Technician ACI: Grade 1 Concrete Field Testing Technician PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1995 to Present Geotechnical Engineer for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Since joining the engineering team at Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Mr. Myers has prepared soil and foundation investigations, field investigations, and various retaining walls and shoring wall designs. Mr. Myers worked as the project manager for the soil and foundation investigations that he has prepared. For these investigations, Mr. Myers has performed the field work, supervised the laboratory work and prepared the final report. Along with performing soil investigations, Mr. Myers has also performed construction observations and testing. He has had experience in the compaction of soils, excavation inspections, earthwork observations and concrete testing. Mr. Myers has worked on projects in Vail, Avon, Edwards, Keystone, Dillon, Silverthorne, Breckenridge and metro Denver. Prior to working at Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Mr. Myers warked as an engineering intern with the Colorado Department of Transportation. During this time Mr. Myers helped construct and monitor new MSE retaining wall designs. In addition to this, Mr. Myers helped obtain, design and organize material for a nationwide class on MSE retaining wall designs. � Jessica E. Brown Staff Engineer Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX EDUCATION: Colorado School of Mines, Golden- BSGE - 2003 University of Colorado, Denver- MSCE - Pursuing AFFILIATIONS: Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Member, Association of Engineering Geologists AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification in compliance with HAZMAT Certification OSHA 40-Hour Health and Safety Trained MSHA 24-Hour Mine Safety and Health Administrative Trained First Aide/CPR PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2006 to Present Geotechnical Engineer for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Since joining the engineering team at Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Ms. Brown has prepared geotechnical field and foundation investigations as well as the design of retaining wall systems. For these investigations, Ms. Brown has prepared cost estimations as well as performed the fieldwork, supervised laboratory-testing, drafting, and prepared the final report. Along with performing soil investigations, Ms. Brown also has experience in field supervision of soil and hard rock drilling programs, material compaction testing, excavation observations, and earthwork inspection. Ms. Brown has worked on projects in Vail, Edwards, Avon, Keystone, Dillon, Silverthorne, Breckenridge and metro Denver. Prior to working at Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Ms. Brown worked as a staff engineer with Golder Associates Inc. During this time Ms. Brown was responsible for figure drafting, volumetric calculations, cost estimations, and report preparation. Other duties entailed CQAE field inspection and supervision of small and large scale landfill and mine liner system construction: including testing and documentation of clay and geosynthetic components. While at this position Ms. Brown worked on projects in Castle Rock, Cripple Creek, Denver Metro, Edwards, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Nebraska. t Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 www.KCE-Denver.com Kerrv E. Keehn Operations/Project Manager LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX EDUCATION: Metropolitan State University - BS - 1989 Arapahoe Community College - AAS - 1985 AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: ACI: Grade 1 Concrete Field Testing Technician Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification: Soils Field Testing Technician PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1989 to Present Operations Manager for Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Currently, Mr. Keehn is the operations manager for Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. and for all construction testing projects. Mr. Keehn has continuing experience in the compaction of soils, excavation inspections, rebar inspections, earthwork observations and concrete testing. He oversees the scheduling and budgets of all construction testing projects and prepares man-hour projections and budget estimates for proposed projects. Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 www.KCE-Denver.com John C. Medina Field/Laboratory Supervisor LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: ACL• Grade 1 Concrete Field Testing Technician Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification: Soils Field Testing Technician NICET- Goetech. Construction Level III NICET-Laboratory Level III NICET —Soils Level III Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 10/OS to Present Field and Laboratory Supervisor for Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Currently, Mr. Medina is the field and laboratory supervisor for all construction testing projects, and our soils testing laboratory. He is responsible for the supervision of feld engineers and laboratory personnel. Mr. Medina has continuing experience in the field testing of soil, rebar observations, masonry testing and observations, concrete testing, post-tensioned tendon layout and elongation observations, as well as supervising the laboratory work. He oversees the scheduling of construction testing projects. Mr. Medina has over 20 years experience as a geotechnical field technician, soils laboratory supervisor, and project manager. Prior to working for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Mr. Medina obtained his experience warking for three other geotechnical engineering companies in the Denver area. . Donald R. Sneed Field Engineer Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 www.KCE-Denver.com LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: CRMCA: Production Control Technician ACI: Grade 1 Concrete Field Testing Technician Nuclear Gauge: Soils Field Testing Technician WAQTC (EBTT) Na 180,831 Summit County Special Inspector: Rebar PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX 1995 to Present Field Engineer for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Since joining Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the fall of 1995, Mr. Sneed has been responsible for field testing of soil, rebar observations, masonry testing and observations, concrete testing, post-tensioned tendon layout and elongation observations for a variety of projects. Some of these projects include ArraBelle at Vail Square, Vail's Front Door, Lodge at Vail, Founder's Park and Garage, and Gore Creek Place at Vail. In addition to projects in Vail, Mr. Sneed has worked on projects in Keystone, Breckenridge and metro Denver. Mr. Sneed also performs various laboratory tests in our Denver labaratory. Prior to joining Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc., Mr. Sneed warked as a field and laboratory technician for Huntingdon Engineering and Environmental, Inc. for 7 years. His duties there included testing of soil and concrete in the field and laboratory. While with Huntingdon Engineering, Mr. Sneed worked on several significant projects including: E-470, D.I.A., AMI Presbyterian/St. Lukes Hospital and Broomfield Aquatic Center, just to name a few. � Faafetai "Ty" Ilaoa Field Engineer Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy• Suite 115• Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 www.KCE-Denver.com LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: ACI: Grade 1 Concrete Field Testing Technician Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification: Soils Field Testing Technician PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2006 to Present Field Engineer for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Since joining Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. in early 2006, Mr. Ilaoa has been responsible for field testing of soil, rebar observations, masonry testing and observations, concrete testing, post-tensioned tendon layout and elongation observations for a variety of projects. Some of these projects include Summit High School, Summit Middle School, and Peak 7 at Breckenridge. In addition to projects in Summit County, Mr. Ilaoa has worked on projects in Vail, Winter Park and metro Denver. Mr. Ilaoa also performs various laboratory tests in our Denver laboratory. Prior to joining Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc., Mr. Ilaoa has 5 years experience as a geotechnical field technician, laboratory technician. Prior to working for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Mr. Ilaoa obtained his experience working for three other geotechnical engineering companies in the Denver area. , N. Reed Vaughan Field Engineer Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 12364 W. Alameda Pkwy • Suite 115 • Lakewood, CO 80228-2845 www.KCE-Denver.com LAKEWOOD (303) 989-1223 (303) 989-0204 FAX CERTIFICATIONS: ACI: Grade 1 Concrete Field Testing Technician AVON/SILVERTHORNE (970) 949-6009 (970) 949-9223 FAX Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certifcation: Soils Field Testing Technician WAQTC (EBTT) No. 180,835 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2005 to Present Field Engineer for Koechlein Consulting Engineers Since joining Koechlein Consulting Engineers, Inc. in August 2005, Mr. Vaughan has been responsible for field testing of soil, rebar observations, masonry testing and observations, concrete testing, post-tensioned tendon layout and elongation observations for a variety of projects. Some of these projects include Lakewood High School, Bear Creek K-8, Exempla Lutheran Medical Center, and Lochbuie WWTP in the Denver metro area. In addition to projects in the Denver Metro area, Mr. Vaughan has worked on projects in Vail, Breckenridge and Winter Park. Mr. Vaughan also performs various laboratory tests in our Denver laboratory. v Jun 28 2006 1:15PM NF l.R5ERJET 3200 p•1 . , #; ' . . . .. , � Y . �"°i?��b-'�i�` �. ��C�;�a��'�;�.: i , ' ` it'AI�#�li,t �t�ti;1��'�, � �'K��µti�Q.�r�tpi ; r .�: - : � � �..� � " � ! - � -; °t ;i �i`� u ttr� �.a°t N4yr�t� t �. �d.��*ti;�ill�l7 �14�.i��,�'e.Ei�l7D'�� ' '; � ..ijp�,i�t <� �.�� 1 .� � '". .. c'S^t+��t 3��r3� ,�.��. ftll��tbri� ,��i �;'�Ei2i il�1Si� ild�!'�gSl�itliA�i�tri i� �. 3_ 'y,E ` � � � `��. .., =i�, +� �{ 1 t ,>,� ,�,, T_ � � - t±e 5�.,. � PROFESSIONAL OBJECTIYE: To secure empl�yrnent where my expenence a�d professionalisn� wif� strer:gth�n my employer, which in tum wi►I enhance my life. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1999-Present P.S_i YVheatr�dge, CO Structuraf Steei Weldlnp Insp�ctlon and 3pray Applfad Fireprooting Inspection fa mulU�stary steei iramod buiidings. Pro�ect� Inciuda: Anheuser-Busch. Fort Coliir�s, CO Aspen Grove Ufestyte Cente•, Littleton CO Denver Womens Correctional Facility, Denver, CO RTD various Projects, Denv�r Metra Lockheed Martln, Lakewood, CO Denve� Inte!natianal Airpo�, Various Projects 1997 - 1999 Inspection S�rvices, Inc Amelia, LA Inspection of structunl welding and coatings. Instaltation of offshore structures, procees piping syatema, and productlon equipment fabrication for: ♦ Tezaco, Chevron �d Vaster Resources 1996-1997 Robert Polbck In�peetions (Ind. Contraclor) Murrietp, CA Structural3tesl W�Idfng Inspeckion, Spray Appllod Firopr+coflng lnspsctian and Magnetfc Particle Testing tor multi-story steel tramsd bulldings. ProJtcts includa: ♦ Claremont Cotieges • Managernant Center - Cirrrmont, CA • Claremont Colleges - Residence Ha1! - Claremont, CA 1995 to 1896 CHJ, '�NC. Cokon CA Stroeturil Stool Walding lnspectlon, Spray Applled Fireproofinq Inapection and Magnetic Partiele Testlng for multi-story atoel hamsd buildl�gs. ProJecta includa: ♦ San Bemardino Counry Medica! Center - Cotton, Califomia 1'892 to 1985 Professional Senrtce Industries, Inc Structural Stsal Wsldinp Inspsc�oNSupsrvision, Spray Apptiod Fireproofing Inapection and Magnetic Partkle T�ting for muW-story steel iram�d buildin{�s. Projects indude: • Riverside County Generai Hosp'r.a� (Lead Inspector) - Morena Valtey, Celifomia • Oregon Arena Project - Portlend, Oregon + Denver Inbematio�al Airport - Denver, Colorado ♦ K-Mart Distribution Center - Brightan, Colcredo ♦ K-Mart Retgil Faciiity - Parlcer, Colorado 1�3 to 1992 Inspection Services, (nc. Amelia. LA WoWin� and instaliatlan I�spaction oi oKshur$ atructur�es and produetion equipment fabrlcatlan Mr; ♦ Freeport- McMoran Company ♦ Pennzoii Production Comaany ♦ Mcbil Oil Gompany ♦ Standard Oil Production Company • She11 flil Company + Texaco �iI CompenY 1962 ta 19$3 Owensby and Kritikos Inc. Lafayette, LA We{ding and Instaltatlo� Inapectian o1 production equipment fabricetion foe. ♦ Texaco Oil Company ♦ Shell Oil Company 1974 to 1982 Enginea�ing Corpora6on of �ouisiana, J G tilackin a�d Associates, Poklock Enginearing (ownership changes) Lahyette, �.A Wolding ond tnstaltadon InspRCtian of aftshoro �hucturee and production equipmant fabrication f�r: Pennzoil Production Campany . J.yn 28 2006 1:15PM HP LRSERJET 3��0 p,� Robert H. Poliock, Jr. - Re�urne Gant. CERTIFICATIONS: ♦ AWS - Cer��ied Welding 1ns}�ctor 19$0 -1990 #80116011, 1991-present, #9112121 �. ♦ IC8�7 -(Special Inspector} Structural Steel and We!ding, # 74�91 ♦ ICBD -(Special InspectorJ Spray Appiied Fireproofing, # 80803 EDUCATION: • AWS -- Certifi�ed Welding Inspeckion � ICBO - Cer�fied Structural Steel and Welding Inspectior • ICBO - Certifisd Spray A.pp�ed Fi�ep�oofing Inspection ♦ University ot Southwestern Louisiana - Completer! one year in Mechanical Engineering PROFESSIONAL REFERENCE3: • Jim Huddleston - Department Manager, P.S.i. (303) 424-5578 • Larry WaRiner- Construction Inspector, RTD, (303) 419-4911- Qenver, CC7 • Ranc3all Furst - Project Engineer, �DOT, (303) 671-6922 - Oenver, CO ♦ George Gray - Vice Presitlent, Inspec6on Services, Inc. (504) 631-0537 - Amefia, LA . ,` � ,� .�. , 1� � C/.-. C � � �.0 . /�� '/"�.\'1� , � ;;��• r-, �� C ( t'\ i� ,, � ;� <�.-, :, � r�� : � _ ,. ♦ � � � �� r � � �. �.. y,,,,, .� � � � �� .., � G �+/ ,�,� `r'7 �. � �� h �., � ° :�- � ��Ca�G'� . � � � r;) � rJ �; �.,,�„ � �� ,� , ' � '`'� �-- .'.., , j3,,� � I1 � � �...� �`�'��` �� .�-- �' �` �.' • •-� � . , \ �� 03 � -� .ti -�.� � .—. � � �i.+ + �-"' � �. ,.� � � � � � � �-� tr'� C� , � � J � �'' Q� � � �� , � Q�� L-+ v �� o 1 i �. � � � I� �V �- . Q CJ �`� +i � :%=�---.. r,.� ��--�:? --.�:-, ,� :. >� c �` );�' 1; � �� .,,�,,�; i :;� 1 ' W .°'�,� `� � � � <, i !�:�� `;�. J � "i'� i c i U � � � N+ �` 'i"'" � O�' � � W � �! � I U� � � �' r � "' { �i �` �� o? � .� J� �� _, �� . -� �,�� '/ .� �E�`X/` rv � i�'�� \ S� p„}=� a 4 � „/� !S G � v � � �s V � ¢ � y Q � ' � ° �° '�^ W � ' �� j �„ � r � C �s�' � � � � � ,�r� �oUoUo� ) �� X X , � <-.� ^� �� : : > �: �t�� J�� c ;.:: _ � . . v 1i��✓��;:- _.. :;.•�'r' 1.j, a "� ::U -� ��T�; � �� A� ;Yi . �_ �"'�� - ��-�''"_r�::'�r .-� ,'r'�.:'�..�r-:=�. �- �` =� rl ; �. ! ` r f' .,� ��`_ � � • �....� � `�: .� r � ��t� '� ` � � ;� � � _ �: ' � 4 C ` f✓ ` :: � � � �.:.., '� t, `,.� ` � ^ � y,�. � � � C ,�i I�: � �i E"""' ` �� ` � � � � _ � �7' ; � ` c� � . _ i � � � - , � � __ � � � ,� �, = ; ,::� ` � . , ,� � F, � },,, : � .'+y.i. a;��.�' ,�.�.{. ,. �K�`y �i��Th. 't sa.r; x �+=1'.� t� �+,��.-,��' . ,, � �� , �- �.��`"�.'�""� ,-.�._...-i`� t _.. .,,; � '_; �� # � C Q � � �" '_"J C �$ �� ; �� ', '-� � � ' �w `��' �� .�,. �;,; <�` � � . -� � � � � �;;, � ^`�{ : � � � �' � �.—� N # '',°��;; � �� f � ti 4 � � ' rr, � ! •,,�.,,�� . C � � -� r =�+ ^ c �� \ �,ti�.� n �, c r .i' � � _ � � l.�.+ t, 7 < , f • i - �"�-' {�� . �i: � � � ��' �� , �.�i � r ,�: � � ` " � v r h. ^� `'` .- s � F ��d�, �,..� �*` ``'� � -�, `� •. �, � ' �; ( , - � �: �` ` �' ' = , � �J :. � aef - �+/� , �� ' �, ey, t : _ I !r r �; � ' � � � .*�`�� `��" `,r��` � _ .,, �r �> a � 1w . : � � � r 1 O,�j r�.� � .,��,i! 'yj�� : � - ,Y. __ . J� ,..._. � �' ; � ,""'" v: , ^ ',�i��lr`, �� `: !,_; `� � � .-� r r� � `= r : �+ � r-„"i �.; .; y ,; r-.�' � . r ; . �� .. �1 � � � ` �J r r�:: - � `L ` ` F� C'i � .� ��` �. � .�"'' `� �„�; a � � - � � � }_ � � .—, rr- � � . `� � � � f � � q � __ � � . `- : ►s; � _ - r- � � 'vl � � � - t � �, k � � � � �� ' _ ` � '� '� `� '� ti�' � '� � , C r�..'...�.� . �, � ' : x �i: �` �' � ,fi �... jf� x,: � � t' � � � S, � U; �i `;:�� s 1 � �.�+�; � ��, � � � "� ,_ � R. � �, � ;_, _ - ;. � , �= �� w � � � _�. � -,� � ��T� = " :i? �---+ � � � - � �,� _ �� y h � � , � �� :; ; K ,� �{., � V �� p'"'� r'- - . !c �J _ M � ��, ~� � � �. � � � ; r � � �� s� � �: � , - � = 7 __ '`, J� .v ` ! ,, _. ;J ` ' 7 �,�. � . \Y�� !i _! . � { _�. {:J w �. \ F._� �,i ��` V _ " \ : ,k' � � ,�, ;� c 4 � - I� ` \ r�r� ,,. ^ �' _ � \ -. r-,�.. _ ,� �� r 1 �; �1 � � �+ .. _ �. .'. � � ` � ��'r. `/ a a . S Y . � � ��'�� , �'s' .��_ �'+4� � � � _ . f " :�, ' „ ;�,••' ` .s.. r � � �. . . . �� , . .. K,,- :�'; � ��, ..� . -� t , . ..`^, � J. .+- , ...� � - , �` �_ _ . _ _ �� -�._%' �-� . . . 7' � �t,�� :� ; � � ♦��Y� �t'+ .1! ._ . .. ir�4� . b � H � � � a �...� � � � � � � � � � N � � � � � � � � G.3 O a a ;o , a, �� • • � . � . � W ; � Q � � � � � ;� � � � � � �J � � � �. � `�. � � , `� � . � `� . � � . � � � �� '�f � � � � .� � � h � `� � � � �S � ,� � � � � � 1� � j� .� � .. � h . � 0 V � t!� � V a � � � � � � � � � A � � � � � � 0 � � � �� -� � .� � � -� �� GV � �n � � u c�- � "� a � � �� _;-� � 0 � �� S I+ti �? Frl � + � �^T', .,�.� �', `.+i �� U � �� Y � 0. .. � � � �� a � .� � �� .� U V :J .� . 02-25-2006 21:09 (�-IRIS MLIFI�CH 3032553b27 .' �,n -,..,,�,,.. � ��„� , .,�,.._., w, _..,�y�.-".'�,,� �� `�� _ _.�� :� � � ...� � _ ..m �.. � . �.�. _� _ . __._�_�_ ..� � �� A. yE ,��; �� r; � � *� � � • . ��! `� �o e�,� � � �� , ' � # C� -,� � r� �� '�,�"� �. � .� .� �� o � �< � �+ +� � `� ��'�"° � v'fi 4.� � �� o� t,'1 p , d ��, ��,,,�� `�+ � �, ,��T �� *� � � �`. �� . � �.�.,, � � � �� `� o�� .�' �, � �, �� , � `� � + � � � �� > �� ' �� a � �� .� C3 � � � � ��' � � :� . � � �� : � �_ , � � �� 11�, � �°1� �� . �� \ '.i::C_. w � � � � Q � � �� ,,_,k ' �,.. `�*',�h �r , �. ' �. � ' �, • , � o� � � � V � C � � � � � � � �� n �� (: � t, � � � , �� 4 � � s � � � C :1 � a M �� v � � � � � .� � a� � � � � ti4 � Q� rL � � a � .� � � � � � '� �ti1i V � .. v a�i G .w F�.. r�! C� � � � � � O � " C u � � q��y c� ai �' � � �� -� o Q � .� �� ~ � U � .o �. ..:. � � � �fi � � � � � Q � � � � � � � O �y t%i � �� .w � � � m � � � °' a E m c� � o� � .� a� m J �+ cii � Qi � � � a� b�p a� �,.{ � s� O C•+ � �-.r � 5�i r� o _ c� � o � � � t Ur � O .� a � � � � � � a�i � � O O N CV � O 7-� 7� h ti � Q� � � o � .0 O � � � � R. � K vw Y � � � � � .� � � � � � � � �1 � `� � � �.:� � � � 4�3 0.i •,,�, C�.� � W `�y � � � � � � � 7�. V � � � � � �� fi � ,L/,/ •� � #�� t C � o � �fi a ��c m � � � ti � � � � � � � ��o Q z .� U o � ±� F:.. ,o � ��+w � � "jy � � � 4ti � m 17 t�p � � � � � � O � U � � � � � C � � N Q -� t� N � �� -c ci. � � �3 � J � � .V � � .� +i•� _ � � � 1 M C'� � � � � � � O � � a � \ � � \ � ? � � � �:,` �n � ~� � � � � N N O O � �, � ti a� � �; A , c (� a � .� o c,� � C 'a a� k CJ W .# . { ' � � � � �} {�) '_.t{-:� � _ i � ' � h� �, Q : ` ] � � � `4�`�. } W � � � � � � � � �� `ii � � ♦ a�,_ \ �^r ♦ . . � � � � � � � '� � � � � •� � � � //',' � �� , N ��..,� � , `.� � ,�` <��'{'��-� ` �� ' , �.a \ �--., ar � �` �.,,' � \ 4a r � � � � � � � � � � � `�, � � � � � � .� � � V �� , � �. Q � � �' � � 1t � � � !� , . I t \� ��f�:.�� \ d �.r �l. p 1 4�[ (4 �d �`'�� s! Jlll � t --�7 �� i��Y.�1 { I .'°"'i`4'r":._' � Q U � � � � u � a � � � � � � �� a�� a >�� U ��%�;�� ..i�E�;::E✓ ,�•! `: ;;��,; ;n.._..; �;�,�� : �;�, �� :r�� f �;; � �^�; ,�la ;�+,y`#" �'` ,�4„-'�,•jr.�';�� ;��,�� -� ,�.�.�� >;� � �"1��✓` s�� , - ;�.�1, lJ�. '•'��; � � tii �,.r fQ � � m -'� ° 0 N � � � � �,r, Q t r �� R �� a Q p��{ C �� `l/ tL `-°- A s+ � a. � � � � � �}ny .� � � � � H 4� tiV V1 � � � � � 'IrV � Q� .� G � � '�.i � �"'a ��1 V � � ai v � � G � .� i-t � � � fi q> � � � O � � 'w�. �i ¢��i ,� ,�N � � � � .> Sm � S � � �a ,� � `�fi� qZ� �1 O � � �` ti .o � �... q �.U� .� � � �U � � � � � B� tD .... � � � � N'� � � N� � � � �y �." � � � � 41 �' a �� .:: � � .-!! c 4? .s3' � �. .� � _ � � �� M a � � �, � i� !� �l � � � � e�` .r0 �.a � �' ti', o � ;� V 0 .� Cil 5..:. w � t/] v n� � � � � 00 N C-i N t��1 C �� A " � c q a � .�, o c� � � � C 's�. a� x C.> W : � � � � � �, o� v Q � c q�� l--- ',�, � > � � :� U QJ � �s ��`„ � � � �� Qz� � '� � �.' � D � � � � ti o � � U �, � � � � � � t� °' w� •� � � $ � � � � �� 4a a� �, � � '�"'� U � � .� � .� c� �► � w L � � w � \ � `�� y � � � Ci, I� t M !� 1� i� � � � � ti,� �v � '' ..,a = �'�� v 4! '� � � � � i � � a � � � �� N N N N � � ti *� � � � Q � �A a� `� a �� . �� w y � 0 � � •� � 4i � � H � � V1 � � � � � Oi � .� � � 4� � � � V � � � � �:. � U � � � � � � � � �/ •� c � �y �� v� es, � .� �� b p {L � � CJ 4 m ~ �� :., ,O �, �� 1 t � V � �a � `��° c � � �� w�. ,U � � � � m � �� L Qi a � � � � � -� � � � �� .v O � ti.. .�.+ � � � � � � a a� � �\i� � n� 0 � � � � � � .� a � � � a�i � a� O O O � tv Cr N N �� .? .� a� � � „ � cp o � .� o � .. � � k �a � x �i W r` r � . w d q Ci C� Cy C1 S7 �' � , \Vl ll'✓ . v/{ 1\-� . W/! \\� . `-// \\ . %/ \1 w %J 1\ w %/ l\ w I/ \\ w 1L \\ w /I 1\ J. //�O � �� "1'� � .� � � � � . � � � "� '� � � ��•� o� � � � .� � � �� o � � � �, t� � `� � +� � �� • �• � �., '""� � ��„L '�, �, � °� \- � �`�� ` � � � ��s � � �� o � � v � � ��('� '^� � � .� � � � � � � ' � 3 Q � w � � W � Cl, w w � � � � U z \o U • tL Q � w � � � � U C� � tM�- \_ � � � z ti � � U 0 N V � � c 0 a� �� . z W �� W QQ c ° 3 X �i O w Q � Z � � Q c p > fl j a � � V O N P C V L � Y c E < v � m B . ,.. . , �� v �,�� .; �� ( �'�� -Y ` '� . � ,; �,� � ,� �,� ct,,�,,= � ,�, �� {�� ' w..��/'� Y �� :�� i-^�\\�_ ;�V( �</', � \�. (''�� ;-'�t�--� �� '� �� t ;/" �/- \!C� 7 � ; %'�ti . �;'r�-�'--""� �':' � °_ 'Y � - �tc� \` � � t\�\� i � / �� D ��../ � � �� ,;�ni�� r-� � " r� I ��,�, �� (� ��,� i ( �� -� ,� ..t :� .� r��lf �, x �t� i( �, '??> � ) > .�' � 1 `�,;��, � , .1��.�� -1 � "�'f � r+ � � � � `,� * ". ``+-rt�.,i � � � � � ,� � � � -�i....i� ' +-� 1 V�. � � � � � •H � �'' `'''°�, i-.. � -1-� � ,°� � �"� lJ` � •�'� �, � �' ��'� `� �� ,.i � -•. � � � % �j . �x `� f"� ��..,� `.►j Cr� ��, � � � .� � V � � �� .� ��7 2 � � .� � •� � �r ..� %"`�, � �:^:i o-� _ r-: ; --� . ti , X,��>>}��}� � ��". �, ,� ;!'�� .�, \'� /�, r> ) �i(ollli}{ ((to111 ){i'�(:,�ll � )( �__ — ____ - ---__- :� ; � � � � ; �� W � --},�, i ; � � � 2 <' f ) � � � �'� �� ,� �, ?� �, G � n j � -" J `+ C? . ��, � � �v =; � �- IW � W I� Z Q �: � � � C a .; 7 Y .,;� � . -• s: � � = v`".__,=.`. ' .��,. : ., f \ �,./ �.�1'�% � .T ` 7 -�'�; .�_ � � � �� - _- � ; r tia= ,�},� _ W� x' �!�- Y�J 'a'•�. , . _'L � i �� J . II .. ,""..��..-..�"./' � . "V r 4 �1 V �' C � � �' G `�/ G `�' t r �� -� '` \ %� � �� i��;�`�1i ,;: '� � 1 � �� _ �� i �, (� \`.'^ V , �� G�'� )1- �4 I ✓ ,�� i /�!�1�1 i :X.'' <� I f -. \V . � �' '� .� �� -�� !'J. . �\��;�;;`; ^ ;�:/ � i.� �� ' -"i,` ,/ ±� I � = <>�; ::: -� .� �} �� .' .��',':i f � `,�. 11 -�,� ) i �" y�� ..� I � � '�j��t`:,: � �, � � � o � `% i � , � � � �k o , �:�>> <J a� � :� �� l c.� , � I, � ,�. ) W ; � �,=o � �i 3 � ; i �,�� i ��—� _ ---°____ _— - -- __.� -. � �i� �,—�� cv�� ct�»�� >> >} t��1»<<r `.�;; ! * ,, � � � ,� . �� ,� � � � a ,� � �_ �/ <, J ) t��t� ��. � r� �� X�� c��xt � � 7 = � ��,� � .�.,� �.....:�.., �---�,...�:,�.�� .�..�;:; _ __'�_ �^� :�� .__- : ��L_, , .� �, . . , Y - . , � �^��1Hd =�;�:- .'l"t:� H �k-I;�,�HI)I-J '=:I�li-i? T�=TS 9��fC�c-��.-5� FROM �� 7 t�R 1 CH P1�%J!� '3�}. : ?19 4$8 i4(�Ci7 i.. � � : +F'. 4 � � . � � �� is _ � � � � �� .� � � � � �� .,,, �' � +► �+' �• N � � ��C�`�� -- �, ��- � �� -� � � � . � � .� �� .�� M � � �' � �� .� .� � � � � �� O � v � � �� SeF• i 5 200� �i: �?G'h1 P2 _ .�- �i � v x ;C �� { ti �� a �a i 1° � Z , �� ' � �� ,� �� N � �� w � � o� w;� � �� > c�-� � ` w p? �� 0 � � � � � � � � . � . I ' . J � � 9��Wd ��=+��'SC��'� t-i:�''J'�`r�JH�lU1 �;I��H"� ?'L : � T �=1�»?-cc-E'� I rruw M� r � i.�r...., � r RUf'1 � JC1,l1tYtlKit.t1 F'tiC7� i�3. ; 719 4$�3 :Q�47 � � � � � � ! f � � � � � � ~ � ` , ' � � � � � � � t � �� ` w 4� ��a� ` � 4 �A►" `� .. � � � � � � E ► � �, . � � � � y s + .r K r ;� 4 w � � � r � ' � � � � Sep. 15 2�3t05 0b:37f'M �3 �M �-• � � � � ! � � � � � *rf � � �� Y .. � � � Y � � a S � � r � 4 r � • � � � ��y� FRfNi % 5EG 1 hlC�C t Cii Lc q'�`��.-r��7� H:�H�:�HUW =�I'�lH:� _," � T T ��l�w:-=?-oGJ � � � T19 488 14007 r � �i � � � r' � � � � � �,t,�� c� �� i� � `I • � � � � �� ' � � � �� `� � � .�` � . �.' � �� `. `� � . � \ SeA. 15 c�5 06:38PM P4 V� � � � . �' °. � � � � �� >; �� ; �� , � E� � � � � � ; � i Y 0 f i� . . ; T �G�H� 1 �ti „r.��.,+�.�--�'".."."" - . ./ ' ij 'y �: �.� �S :_ 4 . ��f v 1' � �::.. � � � � � � � i. i � , ,4 "'� l � �,'�� ' . . . •,-.-.,, �- . � Zc?��2�LI�� H��HBi�HOW '�I��H:_� ��TT 9e1L'ic-77-°� „e�r•- ..^r^—'-'.,'-->.. _,r�.....G...,-�,.,�R�,.:.� f.;:, r � y ; s , t��. � ', a ,� ` w ' . '*+ � �� a � .�� ' ` �' � � � % � , � � �� 0 � a� �.��, �� ,� � � � , � .�`''��`�, � �� c� •� � � � ,,. �� o � m � � �" '� 4. � �� W J � .. . qt � L!'. � �� .� Cn. . � . , 7�� " 4S� �y,j 3ED +.. •'__. .._'T 1 � r '� � . ti* c�JH.� J FRO"i � S�a l t� 1 C?� �+�� i�� +�rrww � � 1M�� r�.�. � ; � ',M�� • � � r � �� r�� ;?, f f 5.+1� �� \��'��. � �°-i� r...�-.—�,-.. �r_ ��ac�1�'� H=�!-��r.'�HOI�I ��i;�H�� i=t� : I� q[�i!�_�c-��^ pi-1p�lE Nd. : 71� 488 SA0A7 Sep. 15 2005 06:40Pf't P7 . : � �` ♦ � ,\ . ♦ � � ` 4 4 � � : , -, ti 4 � � � � ` \ Z .., � ti � ` '� � �. � :� \ ♦ l r � \ \ di ..�3 � � � � � � �, � •. �` �� t ti ♦ .� r. \ ~ �` ti s ' ; w4 ti \ k� �a�� -� 4 � � r � z �;, � -�'� : ,� �. ; . � � .� `�. � � � ` s \� ,` ` * .� � i, � r n : g � � � 0 , � , � E i � ! � i � � �! �J j l i � I � � k 2 � s � . � � � N r �� . � �C'�Nd � FRUM : SEGINuRICN S1I � � � � r�ti L w r••� � � � � � � � � � � �� ,,r�� f� � � !� � � � � � � � � M� � U � � � F+�1 � � Q � � ��f�w Y �j' y � l-yJ i � � � � �"_'�tS`a?r=l�`� N'_!t�8��1-i01-1 �, I•�H=� i'� � T I 91�E c- c�'c -`t� P� ND. : ?14 496 140d7 }�11 z � W i+ � � � t�► W w � w � � � � � � � � � � � .� � � �,� � y* � � r� � i. O = k � t � O � rO �ti4 � A ,95+ �t M �q +.�+ ar � � '.� G � � .� �� , � � � .� �' � � K O '� I � �i7i .� G q,� O � � � � � G � � � � � `� .i: � ;�' � �� i M� � d I� �� O �; { �,, � �; � i I� �� C lp ` do� � �� c� ti N �I � Sep. 15 �C�05 0b:39PM a5 WW L � 2 Y � �� W -r � Q � �� i �` . s r�� + � � ��r,H,-� f �. ._ � � k i i � N�. � 1'� �j", .;�� .�n i �' � � � � ►� � � � � �� +�.+ � . t� � �� ! c'�`��`��i1� H"�tiE3cll-t06� '��T:��-i�! T`� � T T �i[t�9c-��-BE� t - '` � � �, � � � � � c� ,�,,,,� s.. . .., � � � � � ,� '� o� " �. � � � U � '� a� � � �' � � � :� � � � d q � � y.,, � � a Q � � � �.1� �"� v � C.� V� C� C�t �.. tn � + "� �"'� • � � � � � w "�-,.+ � � �." c, � `*� ,�-t �,, t �, �n . �, ''~ ��;�� d d c�,' `� t� U �� °' � c �'� �� a U� � � � � `Z j ' +-* o C7 ��.t ►... �M •� �� t� � �1 �``� � �,t � • � !� '� c,� � � e�v ^r � �v -�"�.a j� q '�r•t '�i � p�, �.. � �-�.. � �� ti " � ' d �1 �'""t q �"� �`�.,, � � � � G � p � �ti�� ... � ^��""� � `:,1 � O, � "'� t� , ,,,, j.. � . �, i'�, ' "' ",C �' ��c � � � � � � . � t�.., a�``.� v � � �` � d ti � W ^ �"� r C7 � --i � t , `J•, i, �.r' : ,;i�. i ;.{ .' '»:; 14 `t � �i i'�. : ! , v.y t r � �' �. �`� r' ^C � ' ,.�;: i'J � �� - ,: -� � ��. � � y,�,� � ,- . � � � � a ''� � ; a � •:� �.� � �'" � � � � ,�.� �► ., � ,t� � .� ..� _� ♦ F� ' ..i�+ p � � - � � � � =� `� � `� � :� ' � �.- o � , ti . ky Q , , y � x, � K V r( .. oW ^ a Q y 41. litr N d � $�y:a • , �w�na ; n�pr�'e 4�i�4' � �i"o� �04s 0 EXHIBIT A ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REQUEST Manor Vail Vail, Colorado Building Permit Number B06-0258 � ��o�� `� NU� 06 � 2006 ��W� �F VAIL Upgrade Existing Construction Type to Type V-A with Equivalent Protection Introduction: Type V-A construction is a prescriptive requirement of the International Building Code, 2003 (IBC) to allow a new fourth floor to be added to the e�usting Manor Vail buildings. Code Section: Tvpes of Construction: The IBC, Paragraph 602.5, addresses Type V construction. Table 601 describes the requirements for Type V-A construction. Code Requirements: Tvpe of Construction: The IBC, Table 601 requires that a11 Type V-A frame, wall, floor and roof construction be one-hour except for interior non-bearing walls. It also sta.tes in the footnotes that heavy timber construction sha11 be allowed where one-hour or less fire resistance rating is required and that an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be allowed to be substituted for one-how fire resistance rated construction. Code Intent: The intent of the code section is primarily to assure that the building will remain structurally sound for a certain time frame during a fire situation. Request: To allow the e�sfing known Type V-B construction (Type V-A deficient construction) to be considered Type V-A construction by providing the following features that will offset the.existing deficiencies . �,�,r,�,_ � 1. Provide new NFPA 13 compliant sprinkler systems in the existing buildings in lieu of an NFPA 13R sprinkler systems. Exception: Building A is separated from Building B and Building D by rated fire walls and there is no new fourth floor overbuild. The residential portions of this building will be provided with a NFPA 13R compliant system with sprinkler protection provided in the third floor attics. Justi�cation: The installation of an NFPA 13 compliant sprinkler system mitigates the known deficiencies of V- A construction when reviewed with consideration of the attached e�ibits A-L. Town of Vail OF��CE M COP �.- _. - � � �� . � � ��,�� E�ibit A �` November 6, 2006 Manor Vail AMR SA Equivalent Construction � Page 1 of 2 ti 11 /06/06 Brian Sipes Date Project Architect Zehren & Associates, Inc. � Charlie Davis Chief Building Official Town of Vail , ' .G�� .�t�� Mike McGee Deputy Chief and Fire Marshal Vail Fire and Emergency Services ��i Date //'/� �� Date �� !�J� i��' / .; � � 11 /06/06 Bob McCleary Date Gen�ral Manager Manor Vail Resort � � \�� Jim Telling �""� Owner's Representative MV Penthouse, LLC Earhibit A Manor Vail AMR SA Equivalent Constluction Date November 6, 2006 Page 2 of Z �, Town of Vail OFFICE COPY Exhibit B ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION REOUEST Manor Vail Vail, Colorado Building Permit Number B06-0258 Allowance of Gore Creek to be Considered as a Public Way Introduction: All buildings are required to be separated from adjacent buildings by a fire separation distance. When this distance requirement cannot be met the buildings are required to provide a fire resistance rating to their exterior wa11s to mitigate the risk of fire spreading from building to building. Code Sections/Requirements: E_�erior Wa11 Fire Resistance Ratines• The Building Code, 2003 (IBC), Table 602: Fire resistance rating requirements for e�erior walls based on fire separa.tion distance. If a building has a fire resistance rating of less than 30' the e�erior wa11s are required to be rated based on the contents of Table 602. Fire Separation Distance: The Intemational Building Code, 2003 (IBC), Section 702.1: Definition of fire separation distance as"The distance measured from the building face to the closest interior lot line, to the center of a street, alley or public way, or to an imaginary line between two buildings on the lot. The distance shall be measured at right angles form the face of the wa11. Code Intent: The intent of these code sections is primarily to prevent fires from spreading from one building to another. Request: To allow for the adjacent stream tract for Gore Creek to be counted as a public way for the purpose of calculating fire separation distance only. Justi�cation: The existing property line is less than 30' from the e�usting building. Seeing as these are earisting conditions, it is impractical to provide the necessary fire sepa.ration distance. The property line in question is shazed with the adjacent stream tract for Gore Creek, which is Town of Vail right of way. Due to the adjacent property being a stream tract upon which no buildings can be built, the calculation of fire separation distance relative to the centerline of Gore Geek meets the intent of the code to provide adequate fire separation between adjacent buildings. E�ibit B November 6, 2006 Manor Vail AMR for Public Way Page 1 of 2 :... Summary: This request is a result of the e�sting conditions of having an e�sting building that is closer to the property line than allowed per the strict letter of the code definition for fire separation distance. By allowing the Gore Creek stream tract to be counted a public way for this calculation, the intent of the code is met while not putting the existing building into violation of the code. We respectfully request your approval of this Administrative Modification. ti 11 /06/06 Brian Sipes D� Project Architect Charlie Davis Date Chief Building Official Town of Vail ��-��•-�'� Mike McGee Deputy Chief and Fire Marshal Vail Fire and Emergency Services //��f�� Date , , __% , i r'�'!',,��, '' '��" /�% ' 11/06/06 Bob McCleary Date General Manager Manor Vail Resort � � 11/06/06 Jim Telling Owner's Rep ntat MV Penthouse, LLC E�ibit B Manor Vail AMR for Public Way Date November 6, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Y BFPE Exhibit C PO Box 1068 Westminster, CO 80036-1068 (303) 426-0342 Tel, (303) 429-9205 Fax bfpe1 @aol.com October 16, 2006 Town of Vail Community Development Attention: Charlie Davis �°p�y pf Va�! 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 �� REVIEWED BY NCV � � �ns; COLORADO INSPECTION AGENGY Subject: Manor Vail Condominiums — 595 East Vail Valley Drive — Fire Protection MOU Dear Charlie; We submit the foflowing as the overall design approach for the new Manor Vail Lodge project to the Town of Vail in regards to the commitment of fire protection features. This commitment replaces the previous agreement prepared by MKK Consulting Engineers, Inc. on December 13, 2002 in its entirety. Since the original commitment, sprinkler protection has been installed in the corridors of Building D, E and F and remodels have been completed in the conference and spa areas. This new commitment has been written to address the new scope of work and the necessary life safety improvements to the existing buildings as well as the new construction. This commitment incorporates portions of the previous agreement that are applicable to the new project. This new commitment is the result of ineetings and discussions between the design team and the Town of Vail to come to an agreement on the best methods to provide acceptable life safety and building protection. The previous time line is amended to begin construction of the new project in September 2006 and complete by November 30, 2008. Existinq Structural and Fire Resistance Features The original construction documents indicate that the building was constructed with 5/8" gypsum wall board (GWB) at interior partitions, party walls, exterior walls (inside face only), ceilings and beneath stairways. Where partial demolition and random checks in several locations have occurred this has been verified. If this construction is verified throughout the existing building, the existing exterior wall assembly would then match UL assembly U355 (Exhibit H) for one-hour construction. All interior bearing and non-bearing walls lack a continuous membrane up to the underside of the floor sheathing above. Most unit-to-unit party wall assemblies utilize celotex in the ceiling to extend the partition up to the floor sheathing. Most unit-to-corridor partitions are completely open within the floor ceiling assembly. The floor ceiling assembly consists of one layer of 5/8 inch GWB on resilient channels below the composite wood and steel joists. The floor above consists of 2" of lightweight concrete on 5/8" structural plywood decking on top of the joists. This construction method differs from 1-hour construction UL assembly L518 (Exhibit H) because only one layer of 5/8" GWB is used rather than the required two layers of'/�" GWB. There are also non-compliant penetrations. Please refer to the attached List of Deficiencies (Exhibit D). Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU Exposed timber framing is utilized for the roof construction of buildings D, E and F. This type of construction is considered Heavy Timber. IBC, 2003, Table 601, Footnote c.2 states that heavy timber shall be allowed where a one-hour or less fire resistance rating is required. Due to various remodels over the years some of this framing is completely exposed and some remains partially concealed at the unit kitchens and baths. In all cases this construction is concealed at the building hallway. Given the above, the construction type for the existing buildings would conform to that of Type V-B construction. Existing common unit access stairways within buildings A, B and C are narrower than the allowed minimum current code standards, but it is not possible to bring into compliance due to existing structural and platted condominium limitations. At most these stairways access 4 units. Allowable Area The allowable area is determined by accessibility, building setbacks and sprinkler protection. Please refer to the attached area calculation drawings (Exhibit E). 1. The ground floor of the A and B buildings (combined) exceeds the allowable area (with increases for setback) in the 2003 IBC. 2. The C building exceeds the allowable area (with increases for setback) for Type V-B construction in the 2003 IBC. 3. The D, E, and F buildings when combined exceed the allowable area (with increases for setback) in the 2003 IBC. Existinq Fire Protection and Fire Alarm Features Buildinq A, Buildinq B. Lobbv and Conference Center (Currentiv Combined) • Automatic sprinkler protection is provided throughout the ground floor (Conference Center) of Building A, the Lobby and areas connecting Building A and Building B, and the ground floor offices/Business Center of Building B. The sprinkler system appears to be installed compliant to NFPA 13. • No automatic sprinkler protection is provided for the condominium units on the second and third floor of Building A or Building B. • There are no standpipe hose connections provided in the ground floor (Conference Center) of Building A, the Lobby and areas connecting Building A and Building B, and the ground floor offices/Business Center of Building B. • Smoke and heat detection devices connected to the main FACP are provided in all common areas of the first through third floors (stairwells, lobby areas, and corridors). Annunciation at the FACP indicates the general area of alarm. • Local alarm smoke detection devices are provided in each of the condominium units. • Heat detection devices connected to the main Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP) are provided in each condominium. Annunciation at the FACP indicates the general area of alarm with areas identified by the condominium floor level and associated stairwell. Four condominium units are accessible by a single stairwell, two on each floor level. • Flow alarm for Building A and Building B are connected to the main FACP with annunciation indicating the general area of water flow. October 16, 2006 Page 2 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU Building C • No automatic sprinkler protection is provided in the three residential levels of Building C with the exception of several recently remodeled condominium units. The sprinkler heads and piping installed in these units are currently not connected to a fire protection water supply. • Standpipe hose connections (1-1/2 inch outlets) in cabinets are provided on each floor level of each stairwell. Each stairwell provides access to six (6) condominium units, finro (2) on each level of the three level building. The west end stairwell provides access to three condominium units only. • Smoke detection devices connected to the main FACP are provided in all common area stairwells. Annunciation at the FACP indicates the general area of alarm by stairwell. • Local alarm smoke detection devices are provided in each of the condominium units. • Heat detection devices connected to the main Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP) are provided in each condominium. Annunciation at the FACP indicates the general area of alarm with areas identified by condominium floor level and associated stairwell. • Flow alarm for the building is connected to the main FACP with annunciation identified by flow switch. Building D, Buildinq E and Buildinq F • Automatic sprinkler protection is provided throughout the corridor on each floor level extending down the center of each building with studio units on each side of the corridor. Stairwells are at each end of the corridor(s) on both ends of each building. • Standpipe hose connections (1-1/2 inch outlets) in cabinets are provided at the center of each corridor on each floor level. • Smoke detection devices connected to the main FACP are provided in all common areas (stairwells and corridors). Annunciation at the main FACP indicates the building of alarm. Annunciation at the remote panel on the ground level of each building indicates the floor level of alarm. • Local alarm smoke detection devices are provided in each of the studio units. • Heat detection devices connected to the main Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP) are provided in each studio. Annunciation at the main FACP indicates the building of alarm. Annunciation at the remote panel on the ground level of each building indicates the floor level of alarm. • Flow alarms for each building are connected to the main FACP with annunciation by building. Annunciation at the remote panel on the ground level of each building indicates the floor level of alarm. October 16, 2006 Page 3 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU Fire Resistance Desiqn Modifications The following modifications will be provided to bring the fire safety provided in the existing buildings to meet a level of equivalent requirements for the 2003 International Building Code. Additionally, wherever paper backed insulation is exposed during demolition or the installation of other equipment; the insulation will be removed from the exposed area. Building A and Conference Center 1. The existing construction is considered Type V-B. The construction is similar to Type V-A with the deficiencies listed in Exhibit D. Building A will be separated from Building B by a new fire wall (Exhibit F) and from Building D by a new fire wall. Building A will therefore be considered an existing non-compliant building that has no new construction and therefore requires no construction type upgrade. 2. The existing common unit access stairway width will not be increased based on IBC, 2003, Paragraph 3403.4 which allows existing stairs to be altered or replaced without changing proportions or complying with section 1009 (including width) where the existing space and construction do not allow it. The existing combustible finish materials will be removed from stairwells and replaced with 5/8" fire rated GWB. 3. The exterior wall construction matches that of a UL wall assembly U355 and is considered one-hour from the interior. The exterior wall construction will be upgraded through the addition of new non-combustible finish materials on the exterior. These new finish materials may include 7/8" cement stucco, cementitious siding, or stone veneer. 4. The interstitial space formed between the existing third floor roof and the new fourth floor plate and the attic spaces in Building A will be protected with a performance based sprinkler system. Building B and Lobbv The existing construction is considered Type V-B. The construction is similar to Type V-A with the deficiencies listed in Exhibit D. Building B will be separated from Building A by a new fire wall (Exhibit F) and from Building C by a new fire wall (Exhibit G) and from Building D by a new fire wall (as noted on Exhibit E). As noted above, some existing locations within building B are already compliant to Type V-A construction. The remaining Building B construction will be upgraded to Type V-A according to the attached location map (Exhibit L). This will be accomplished by completing the ceiling GWB membrane to meet the one- hour fire resistive construction assembly requirements and by upgrading all penetration seals in the wall and floor/ceiling assemblies to one-hour fire resistive construction requirements. 2. The existing common unit access stairway width will not be increased based on IBC, 2003, Paragraph 3403.4 which allows existing stairs to be altered or replaced without changing proportions or complying with section 1009 (including width) where the existing space and construction do not allow it. The existing combustible finish materials will be removed from stairwells and replaced with 5/8" fire rated GWB. 3. The exterior wall construction matches that of a UL wall assembly U355 and is considered one-hour from the interior. The exterior wall construction will be upgraded through the addition of new non-combustible finish materials on the exterior. These new finish materials may include 7/8" cement stucco, cementitious siding, or stone veneer. October 16, 2006 Page 4 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU 4. On November 16, 2004 members of the team walked the project with Chief McGee and identified many existing violations of fire resistive construction practices and other existing building construction problems. These discussions and observations were memorialized in a letter drafted by RA Nelson on February 3, 2005. (Attached) This letter should not be considered exhaustively researched, rather to be an understanding of the types of violations observed and general types of concerns the fire and building departments have with the existing construction. a. Conditions outlined in the February 3, 2005 memo and other similar readily accessible and observable conditions and violations are considered maintenance items and the Manor Vail Resorts is currently correcting these items. b. It is generally understood that the existing building probably contains concealed violations (Exhibit D). 5. The interstitial space formed between the existing third floor roof and the new fourth floor plate and the attic spaces in Building B will be protected with a performance based sprinkler system. Buildinq C 1. Although Building C will be combined to Building B through new construction, Building C will be separated from Building B by a new fire wall (Exhibit G). 2. The existing construction is considered Type V-B. The construction is similar to Type V-A with the deficiencies listed in Exhibit D. The Type V-B construction is being upgraded to Type V-A through equivalency by installing a NFPA 13 compliant sprinkler system in lieu of the required NFPA 13R system (Exhibit A). This sprinkler system upgrade will provide equivalent protection to address the deficiencies in Exhibit D, Items 1-8. 3. The existing common unit access stairway width will not be increased based on IBC, 2003, Paragraph 3403.4 which allows existing stairs to be altered or replaced without changing proportions or complying with section 1009 (including width) where the existing space and construction do not allow it. The existing combustible finish materials will be removed from stairwells and replaced with 5/8" fire rated GWB. 4. The exterior wall construction matches that of a UL wall assembly U355 and is considered one-hour from the interior. The exterior wall construction will be upgraded through the addition of new non combustible finish materials on the exterior. These new finish materials may include 7/8" cement stucco, cementitious siding, or stone veneer. 5. The interstitial space formed between the existing third floor roof and the new fourth floor plate and the attic spaces in Building C will be protected with a performance based sprinkler system. Building D, Buildinq E, and Building F 1. Although Buildings D, E and F will be combined together through new construction, each building will be separated from the other by a new fire wall (as noted in Exhibit E). 2. The existing construction is considered Type V-B. The construction is similar to Type V-A with the deficiencies listed in Exhibit D. The Type V-B construction is being upgraded to Type V-A through equivalency by installing a NFPA 13 compliant sprinkler system in lieu of the required NFPA 13R system (Exhibit A). This sprinkler system upgrade will provide equivalent protection to address the deficiencies in Exhibit D, Items 1-8. October 16, 2006 Page 5 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU 3. The floor ceiling assembly between the first floor residential units and the basement boiler room and accessory back-of-house office areas will be upgraded to Type V-A by completing the ceiling GWB membrane to meet the one-hour fire resistive construction assembly requirements and by upgrading all penetration seals to one-hour fire resistive construction requirements. 4. The exterior wall construction matches that of a UL wall assembly U355 and is considered one-hour from the interior. The exterior wall construction will be upgraded through the addition of new non combustible finish materials on the exterior. These new finish materials may include 7/8" cement stucco, cementitious siding, or stone veneer. 5. Each of the existing vertical exit stairways will be removed and replaced with rated code compliant vertical exits at each end of each building. 6. The interstitial space formed between the existing third floor roof and the new fourth floor plate in Buildings D, E and F will be protected with a performance based sprinkler system. Allowable Area (See Exhibit E) 1. Buildings A and B will be separated into two separate buildings by a new finro-hour fire rated wall. The buildings will be provided with a new NFPA 13 sprinkler system and separated from Building C and D building by new fire walls. 2. Building C will be separated from Building B by a new fire wall. The building will be provided with a new NFPA 13 sprinkler system to provide equivalent Type V-A construction. 3. Buildings D, E, and F will be separated from each other by new firewalls, which will divide the total area into three buildings of area that meet the 2003 IBC requirements for Type V-B construction. The buildings will be provided with a new NFPA 13 sprinkler system to provide equivalent Type V-A construction. Fire Protection and Fire Alarm Desiqn Modifications The following modifications are provided to bring the fire safety features in the existing buildings to meet a level of equivalent requirements for the 2003 International Building Code. Building A and Conference Center New automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed and existing automatic sprinkler systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 13, 2002: NFPA 13R and Town of Vail amendment requirements. The existing automatic sprinkler system in the commercial areas shall be updated to comply with NFPA 13 where necessary. The new automatic sprinkler systems in the residential areas shall be designed and installed to comply with NFPA 13R (existing combustible floor/ceiling in the residential occupancy shall not be protected as part of this design). 2. Zoning for the Conference Center shall remain as floor by floor basis and zoning for the residential areas shall be on a stairwell by stairwell basis. Existing sprinklers in the Conference Center shall be replaced with new quick response type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. New sprinklers in the residential areas shall be residential type sprinklers. Existing sprinklers in residential areas shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. Existing 1-1/2 inch floor control valve assemblies in existing hose valve cabinets shall be reworked for water supply for new residential automatic sprinkler systems and existing corridor sprinkler piping connected to new sprinkler system. October 16, 2006 Page 6 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU 3. Existing condominium units with automatic sprinkler piping in place shall be modified to meet NFPA 13, 2002 requirements as necessary and connected to the new building automatic fire sprinkler system. Existing sprinklers shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. Concealed combustible spaces shall be protected with NFPA 13, 2002 sprinkler system. 4. New automatic sprinkler systems meeting NFPA 13, 2002 requirements shall be installed on the new 4th story and in the new resulting concealed space between the existing 3�d floor roof and 4th story floor. Zoning shall be provided on a floor by floor basis. Two existing 3�d floor 1-1/2 inch hose valve risers in each residential wing shall be extended to the 4th floor, (each separately valved with flow and tamper switches), and used for the water supply for the new 4th story residential automatic sprinkler systems. 5. Piping replacement as a result of investigations occurring as automatic sprinkler installation is taking place will dictate the need for any existing piping replacement due to corrosion obstruction in the pipe. 6. New dry standpipes shall be provided in each new stairwell connecting 4 stories. FDC shall be provided at a location acceptable to the fire department. 7. Design documents for the new and revised automatic sprinkler protection and standpipe systems shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the automatic sprinkler protection system installation. 8. New addressable fire alarm system shall be installed and existing fire alarm systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 72, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements. All devices shall be addressable or monitored by addressable modules. 9. Design documents for the new and revised fire alarm system shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the fire alarm system installation. Buildina B and Lobbv 1. New automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed and existing automatic sprinkler systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 13, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements (existing combustible floor/ceiling in the residential occupancy shall be protected as part of this design). Multi-level combustible concealed areas above the existing commercial ceilings shall be upgraded where non-compliant (Exhibit L). 2. Zoning for the commercial areas shall remain as floor by floor basis and zoning for the residential areas shall be on a stairwell by stairwell basis. Existing sprinklers in commercial areas shall be replaced with new quick response type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. New sprinklers in the residential areas shall be residential type sprinklers. Existing sprinklers in residential areas shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. Existing 1-1/2 inch floor control valve assemblies in existing hose valve cabinets shall be reworked for water supply for new residential automatic sprinkler systems and existing corridor sprinkler piping connected to new sprinkler system. 3. Existing condominium units with automatic sprinkler piping in place shall be modified to meet NFPA 13, 2002 requirements as necessary and connected to the new building automatic fire sprinkler system. Existing sprinklers shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. Concealed combustible spaces shall be protected with NFPA 13, 2002 sprinkler system. October 16, 2006 Page 7 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU 4. New automatic sprinkler systems meeting NFPA 13, 2002 requirements shall be installed on the new 4th story and in the new resulting concealed space between the existing 3�d floor roof and 4th story floor. Zoning shall be provided on a floor by floor basis. Two existing 3rd floor 1-1/2 inch hose valve risers in each residential wing shall be extended to the 4'h floor, (each separately valved with flow and tamper switches), and used for the water supply for the new 4th story residential automatic sprinkler systems. 5. Piping replacement as a result of investigations occurring as automatic sprinkler installation is taking place will dictate the need for any existing piping replacement due to corrosion obstruction in the pipe. 6. Poz-Lok piping known to exist in automatic sprinkler systems will be removed and replaced as part of future renovations unless disturbed during construction. 7. New dry standpipes shall be provided in each new stairwell connecting 4 stories. FDC shall be provided at a location acceptable to the fire department. 8. Design documents for the new and revised automatic sprinkler protection and standpipe systems shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the automatic sprinkler protection system installation. 9. New addressable fire alarm system shall be installed and existing fire alarm systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 72, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements. All devices shall be addressable or monitored by addressable modules. 10. Design documents for the new and revised fire alarm system shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the fire alarm system installation. Building C 1. New automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed and existing automatic sprinkler systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 13, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements (existing combustible floor/ceiling in the residential occupancy shall be protected as part of this design). 2. Zoning for the residential areas shall be on a stairwell by stairwell basis. New sprinklers in the residential areas shall be residential type sprinklers. Existing sprinklers in residential areas shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. Existing 1-1/2 inch floor control valve assemblies in existing hose valve cabinets shall be reworked for water supply for new residential automatic sprinkler systems and existing corridor sprinkler piping connected to new sprinkler system. 3. Existing condominium units with automatic sprinkler piping in place shall be modified to meet NFPA 13, 2002 requirements as necessary and connected to the new building automatic fire sprinkler system. Existing sprinklers shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. 4. New automatic sprinkler systems meeting NFPA 13, 2002 requirements shall be installed on the new 4`h story and NFPA 13 requirements in the new resulting concealed space between the existing 3rd floor roof and 4t" story floor. 4`" story zoning shall be provided on a floor by floor basis. Two existing 3�d floor 1-1/2 inch hose valve risers shall be extended to the 4`n floor (each separately valved with flow and tamper switches), and used for the water supply for the new 4th story residential automatic sprinkler systems. October 16, 2006 Page 8 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU 5. New dry standpipes shall be provided in each new stairwell connecting 4 stories. FDC shall be provided at a location acceptable to the fire department. 6. Design documents for the new and revised automatic sprinkler protection and standpipe systems shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the automatic sprinkler protection system installation. 7. New addressable fire alarm system shall be installed and existing fire alarm systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 72, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements. All devices shall be addressable or monitored by addressable modules. 8. Design documents for the new and revised fire alarm system shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the fire alarm system installation. Building D, Buildinq E and Buildinq F 1. New automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed and existing automatic sprinkler systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 13, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements (existing combustible floor/ceiling in the residential occupancy shall be protected as part of this design). 2. Zoning shall be provided on a floor by floor basis. New sprinklers in the residential areas shall be residential type sprinklers. Existing sprinklers in residential areas shall be replaced with new residential type sprinklers used throughout the balance of the project. New unit piping shall be connected to existing corridor outlets. 3. Existing condominium units with automatic sprinkler piping in place shall be modified to meet NFPA 13, 2002 requirements as necessary and connected to the new building automatic fire sprinkler system. Existing 1-1/2 inch floor control valve assemblies in existing hose valve cabinets shall be reworked for water supply for new residential automatic sprinkler systems and existing corridor sprinkler piping connected to new sprinkler system. 4. New automatic sprinkler systems meeting NFPA 13, 2002 requirements shall be installed on the new 4th story and NFPA 13 requirements in the new resulting concealed space between the existing 3�d floor roof and 4th story floor. 4th story zoning shall be provided on a floor by floor basis. The existing 3�d floor 1-1/2 inch hose valve risers shall be extended to the 4tn floor and used for the water supply for the new 4th story residential automatic sprinkler systems. 5. New dry standpipes shall be provided in each new stairwell connecting 4 stories. FDC shall be provided at a location acceptable to the fire department. 6. Design documents for the new and revised automatic sprinkler protection and standpipe systems shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the automatic sprinkler protection system installation. 7. New addressable fire alarm system shall be installed and existing fire alarm systems shall be modified to meet IBC, 2003; NFPA 72, 2002 and Town of Vail amendment requirements. All devices shall be addressable or monitored by addressable modules. 8. Design documents for the new and revised fire alarm system shall be submitted as part of the building design process. Approved design documents will be used for bidding purposes and contractor selection for the fire alarm system installation. October 16, 2006 Page 9 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU Fire Protection Improvements shall progress with the construction schedule for new and remodel work. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Sincerely, BFPE (��-t/� �� Perry B. Matthews, P.E. October 16, 2006 Page 10 of 11 Manor Vail Resort Fire Protection MOU The following signatures indicate agreement of both parties to the above commitments and dme frames: Manor Vail Resort Town of Vail Community Development � ' � / . / Y (� � i / �'1� // ! ( � ! I �/. � ��f �(/ � �.' - I �7 P ( / � � Bob McCleary Charlie Davis General Manager Chief Building Official Vail Fire and Emergency Services Architect ----� ��-�% � � �-- ,�d�'l� .�.��r' .=�� Mike McGee Brian Sipes, AIA Deputy Chief and Fire Marshal Project Architect Colorado Inspection Agency M.V. Penthouses, LLC. � � �� Ma Royer �� P Jim Te ing Plan Reviewer Manage October 16, 2006 Page 11 of 11 r � #- October 16, 2006 Exhibit D Manor Vail List of Known or Assumed Defi REVIEWED BY NOV � , ,,,,, COLORADO lNSPECTION AGENCY Existin Floor-Ceiling Assemblies do not match a 1-hour tested �,�� pl�ely g unprotected. 1.1. Assembly consists of lightweight concrete on plywood sheathing on composite wood and metal joists with one layer of 5/8" GWB on 1/2" resilient channels on the bottom of the joists. 1.2. The ceiling GWB is 5/8-inch, but it is unknown if it is fire rated or was when constructed. 1.3. Paper backed rock wool insulation e�sts within floor assembly at all e�erior walls and unit-to-unit party wa11 partitions. 2. Existing interior bearing wa11s have 5/8" GWB on each side in all locations that have been investigated. Until every location can be investigated, this cannot be assumed to occur everywhere. Several wa11s also have been observed to have non-compliant penetrations (washer boxes, non rated electrical panels, etc.). 3. Timber beams spanning openings in the interior bearing wa11(typically in unit kitchens) appear to have been constructed in several configurations. The original condition appears to have located the beam below the floor joists with and open framed pony wa11 between the top of the beam and the top chord of the trusses. Some of these beams have been relocated within the floor ceiling assembly and others have had their GWB wrapping removed to expose the timber. 4. Approved draft stop or fire resistant assemblies (between units and the corridor and in between units) above e�cisting ceilings may or do not e�st. 4.1. All interior bearing and non-bearing walls lack a continuous membrane up to the underside of the floor sheathing above. 42. Most unit-to-unit party wall assemblies utilize celotex behind one of the layers of 5/8" GWB in the assembly. This celotex membrane continues up within in the ceiling up to the floor sheathing. 4.3. Most unit-to-corridor partitions are completely open within the floor ceiling assembly. These partitions consist of offset studs and also utilize resilient channels in some instances. Paper backed insulation has been observed in some of these assemblies. 5. In building B(primarily beneath the Lord Gore Restaurant) there are numerous non-compliant existing conditions as previously discussed with the Fire Deparlment. These conditions include multiple layers of concealed combustible construction and non-rated or incomplete assemblies. 5.1. The team believes that the multiple levels of construction above the spa area were each provided with sprinkler protection during a recent remodel at the direction of the Fire Department. 6. Eausting residential units may have bath exhaust fans with ducts and kitchen hoods with ducts. 61. Most of the kitchen hoods observed are of the recirculating type. Manor Vail List of Deficiencies Page 1 of 3 E�chibit D � October 16, 2006 6.2. Kitchen hoods that a.re not recirculating typically travel through the unit directly to the exterior. In some cases top floor units may penetrate the roof assembly for a more direct route. 6.3. Bath e�austs typically travel directly to the e�erior within the unit and may utilize a section of vinyl flexible duct to connect the fan with rigid metal duct. 7. There appear to be numerous renovation conditions within e�sting residential units where non-rated equipment was utilized within wa11 and ceiling assemblies. Examples of conditions observed are: '7.1. Recessed ceiling (can) lights 72. Speakers and similar sound equipment 7.3. Washer/Dryer boxes in corridor partitions 7.4. Non rated panels 7.5. Other similar penetrations Firestopping may not be present at penetrations through e�sting rated assemblies or assemblies intended to be rated. 9. E�usting common unit access stairways within buildings A, B and C are narrower than minimum current code standards and may not be possible to bring into compliance due to e�usting structural and platted condominium limitations. At most these stairways access 4 units. Items below are not addressed in the MOU, 6ut proposed solutions are high►ighted. 10. The e�sting CMU wall between the residential portion of building B and the restaurant contains numerous non-repaired penetrations. a. I'e�a repaired to compliance 11. Many of the e�sting clay fireplace flues are cracked or othervvise damaged based on a videotape analysis. All e�sting boiler flues appear inta.ct. These flues exist within CMU fireplace structures that e�end from foundation to above the e�sting roof line. a. All existing fireplaces are currently being converted to gas appliance inserts that utilize independent flues inside thf� existing flues for routing only. E�sting flues in the B, D, E and F buildings will receive new flues routed within the existing flues that tranisition to new chases thro�zgh the new construction. Building A fireplaces will receive new gas appliance inserts that utilize independent flues inside the existing flues for routing only. 12. It appears that there are make up air ducts to each level of buildings D, E and F that are fed by an AHU on the existing roof. It is unknown if the vertical shaft this duct is located within is rated or if there are fire dampers at each level. 13. It is unknown if the existing catering kitchen hood e�aust is protected within a shaft assembly as it tra.vels from the ground level of A to the roof of the B-building. This duct is only observable at the kitchen and storage area and again at the roof. a. This : Manor Vail List of Deficiencies Page 2 of 3 E�►ibit D October 16, 2006 14. The ceiling of the laundry room, mechanical rooms and the mailroom are non-compliant or non- rated assemblies. ' nstruction. 15. Numerous studio units have been converted to one-bedroom units. It is unknown if the town of Vail permitted these conversions or if the e�sting windows provide code compliant egress and ventilation. � The only renovations occu � and building alarm systems. 16. Some existing operable windows located in the commercial space appear to be closer than permitted by code to e�aust devices. ::m- � 17. Some windows and/or assemblies may not meet current tempered glazing requirements. � To the extent that this is a remode}. ` renovation it will not be replaced. 18. The floor ceiling assembly between the ls` floor residential units and the basement accessory units such as the boiler rooms in buildings D and E and the boiler room and accessory back-of-house office in building F are non compliant and have numerous penetrations. a. Manor Vail List of Deficiencies Page 3 of 3 E�ibit D B06-0191 : Entries for Item:540 - BLDG-Final C/O 13:44 11/16/2012 Action Comments By Date Unique_ Ke PA ALL EXISITNG UNIT ARE APPROVED FOR JRM 10/06/2008 A000118 C.O.. TCO CORRECTIONS DATED 374 AUGUST 20TH ARE COMPLETED. PA C O'S APPROVED FOR "NEW" UNITS JRM 10/23/2008 A000119 278,327,448,480,481 ONLY 081 PA APPROVED THE FOLLOWING UNTIS FOR JRM 10/29/2008 A000119 C.O. 298 268 368 378. CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR C.O. ON THE FOLLOWING UNITS. 324- SPIRAL STAIRS 41NCH OPENING AT THREADS. 460 AND 461.. GUARDS AND HAND RAILS TO LOFT AREA MUST BE 421NCHES AND HAND RAIL MUST BE CONTINOUS... PA APPROVED C.O. FOR UNITS 430 AND 442 JRM 11/26/2008 A000120 ONLY CABELAS 384 AP JRM 01/31/2012 A000148 792 Total Rows: 5 Page 1