HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5D TRACT B C VAIL TRANSPORTATION CENTER SIGNAGE LEGALTOWN OFVAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2t38
ParcelNo...: 210108227002
ProjectNo : Q&_\Or - OZ{ L)
OWNER TOhIN OF VAIL
t FINAT.ICE DEPT
75 S FRONTAGE RD
VAIL CO 81657
License:
APPLIC.ANT A.K. ELECTRIC
2103 ZEMATT I,ANE UNIT 2103-A
VAIL, CO
8L657
I-,icense;
CONTRACTOR A.K. ELECTRIC
2].03 ZEMATT I,ANE UNIT 2103-A
VAII-,, CO
8L657
License: 117-E
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
' ).-,\.f ), f\.,* rl'
UIL
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Job Address: 241 E MEADOW DR VAIL
Location.....: 17 LOCATIONS INTOWN BUS ROUTE
Permit #: E0l-0140
Status...: ISSUED
Applied. . : 06/2112001
Issued. . : l0/O4l200l
Expires. .: 0410212002
06/21-/2001- Phone:
06/2L/200L Phone: 970-390-3258
06/2t/200a Phone:
Desciption: 17 BUS STOP LIGHT SIGNS
LH CR AT MARRIOTT
LHPL(A CONCERT HALL PLAZA
LH AUX BLDG
LH LH MALL
w MEADOW @ LTBRARY
DOBSON ARENA
VVMC
ls2WMEADOW
35 E MEADOW
l3OEMEADOW
)(ROADS
SWISS HAUS
VTRC
EMEADOW@ SONNENALP
VORLAUFER
HANSON RD ANDWD
GOLD PEAK
Valuation: $30,000.00
*'tr*l*lrl****'t**t***:l:t**l*aaa:i:l*aa**
Electrical-----> S54o.oo Total Calculated Fees-> 9543'00
DRB F€e-----> So. oo Additional Fees-----> (S543.00 )
Investigation--> 90. oo Total Pemit Fe€----> S0.00
Will Call----> 53 . oo Payments----------> 90 . 0 0
TOTAL FEES-->ss43.00 BALANCE DIIE---->90.00
Approvals:I€em: 05000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT
06/2!/200L JHM Action: AP
***aaaaaaa**:l,it'aa*aataaa*aaar***r3rt:3:!ra*:l:l:t|tllllat,r****************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Cond: 12
.ll.-....1;1.;....T'-T..:::.:.::::-?::.*:..y--?:::T.-l-:..:X.t.T...:::."::::..::511fl11......:*,,+,,1,1********
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required. completed an accurate plot plan, and
state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Tov,'n
ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review approved,
Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOTJR HOURS IN ANCE BY t:00AM-5PM.
CONTRACTOR ANDOWNE
Building Permit #:
Electrical Permit #:
rcWN(frYAIL
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657 {oCONTRACTOR INFORMATION
?o- 5zTown of Vail Reg. No.:Electrical Contractor:
ELECTRICAL VALUATION : $AMOUNT OF SQ FT IN STRUCTURE:
. FEET FOR I{EW BUILDS ANd VALUATIONS FOR ALL OTHERS
Conbct '70-328-8640 or #
t2-a7 -cbz-
Job Name:,
t ev$ R, r \ S.)., n q JobAddress: s e r r4r/""/"!
Lesat Description ll .*' I ero.rl Filing:Subdivbion:
Owners Name: ll Address:Phone:
Engineer:Address:Phone:
Detailed description of work:
Nexf Ru s SlonS
wo*cruor ru"qtffoo,utt I Remodel( ) Repair( ) TempPower( ) fther( )
WorkType: Interior( ) txenorfr Bo$( )Does an EHU exist atthis location: Yes ( ) No ( )
Typeof Bldg.: Single-family( ) Duplex( ) Multi-family( ) CommercialR Restaulll l:f'er1 l
No. of b<isting Dwelling Units in thb building:No. of Accommodation Units in this building:
Is this oermit for a hot tub: Yes ( ) No ( )
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No ( )Does a FirB Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No ( )
t!**********r,ri*r!**r*******trrr!*,!,r*,rJr*rrr*FOR OFFICE USE ONLY****r*****:tit*ii*'ti*t**l**i***i*t****t
F: /everyone/furms/elecperm
\
*,gn Review Action rOm
TOWN OF VAIL
category Numbef o^e 6r/21/E4
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
Owner, Address and Phone:
nr"n it"@o nEDd ress and Ph on e :
LegalDescription: Lot- Bfock- subdivision'-1.,.' / t','r-t .,'-. lh, -ZoneDistrict?-_, /.
Proiect Street Address:
Comments:
Staff Action
Motion by:Vote:
Seconded by:
! Approval
! Disapproval
y!staff APoroval
Conditions:
t,u,*i f -+-Lr,.ot-.-t.A-^. Vi.{--
Town Planner
DRB Fee Pre-paid 23.oe
'tri'f,d lAgD3
o
ION omn af rollolAPPLICAT
(Please Print or Type,
--NAME OF PROJECT -1 s^zA/=zLDA-ts VTC- s.Ea,rr f g)
NAME oF pERsoN suBMrrrrNc )ue Vq+hi4fy1 puoNa 4tu-r414
ADDREss To Bef lZ l Va/e CO 3 lto5g
NAI4E OF OWNER Trv,bcn line Tou+rs puoNn Li -lto -t4 I I
ADDREsS Bt'-l l3l V a^i.ttb6B
lbt-L
co
STCN/ATfNING APPLTCATION
SIGNATT]RE OF OWNER
LOCATION OF PROJECT ry€/U=T 6nfYa flCu
DEscRrprroN oF pRoJEcr -S,r=a,.r(l) -iD A^br./c,,,r.'.gL
I E/'-,,tb6 4.-.Ll- /.JE--:. Ll4L{ijtri.,.t) L^Jt':-il.r,\-, }74E vTC-
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REOUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE
APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD.
A. DESCRIPTION
PROJECTINc,
A
OF THE SIGN/AWNING
ETC), INCLUDE SIGN
(FREE STANDING, WALL,
MESSAGE.
VA+LS OLDE\T
4r.t ."Fca
B.SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL
SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN,SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO
L t2 :(-€3'l-
D.
E.
HETGHT OF SIGN ABOVE GR,ADE
DESCRIBE LIGHTING (EXTSTING oR PROPOSED)
N+-rUBA.L L.EGHT
E k .r sf^J6
F.
G.
H.
LENGTH OF BUSINESS FRONTAGE (FT)=o
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL (ATTACH)
FEE: 520.00 PtuS 51.00 PER SOUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA. ?r'-r\r \ptto . 2A' oocrrEcK uo. 3l4t onre bllSl94gtfJ
REOUIRED MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPI.,ICATION
1.
2,
3.
Site Plan
Elevations showing exact, Iocation of sign or
awning on the building
Photographs showing proposed location4, _ Colored scale drawing5. _ Sample of proposed rnaterials
6.
Sign edninistrat,or
Photograph of sign if avail
TO: SIGN APPLICANTS
When applications for signs are submitted, the followinginformation is required:
1. A completed sign/awning application (at,tached).
2. A site plan showing the exact locat,ion where the signis t,o be located.
A photograph if possible and building elevation showingthe location of the proposed sign.
A scaled drawing which details the design of the sign,as follows:
(a) Colored exactly as sign will be(b) A list of materials to be used in sign (meta1,
wood, canvas, paint, etc. )(c) Photograph of sign if available.(ai speciiic- letteriig style and size
5. If an awning is proposed, submit drawings showingexactly how and where the awning is attached to t,hebuilding and how the awning is to be constructed.
6. Descript5-on of lighting that will be used in
conjunction with the sign or awning. If proposing an
awning, lighting is not allowed to shine through theentire awning which calLs undue attention to thebusiness. Lighting may spotlight only the actual signlet,tering on the awnlng.
RECOMMENDATIONS OR POINTERS
1. Check sign code - verify site, height et,c.2. Be specific. vagueness on design, size, construction may
delay the approval of your sign.3. Measure frontage of business.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REOUIRED AT THE TIME OF APPI.,ICATION
SUBMITTAL.
If this application requires a separate review by any locaf,
State or Federal agency other than the Town of VaiI, theapplication fee shal] be increased by $200.00. Examples of such
review, may include, but are not linited to: Colorado Departmentof Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shaLl be responsibLe for paying any publishing fees
whicb are in excess of 50t of the application fee. If, at the
appJ.icant's requestr any rnatter is postponed for hearing, causing
the matter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant.
.'
Applications deemed by the Community Developmen't OeparUment to
have significant design, land use or other issues which may have
a significant inpact on the community may require review by
consultants other that town staff. Should a determination be
made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to
review any application, Community Development may hire an outside
consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to
pay hin or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town by
the applicant at the time he files his application with the
Corununity Developrnent DePartment. UPon completj.on of the reviewof the application by the consultant, any of the funds forwarded
by the applicant for payment of the consultant which have not
been paid to the consultant shall be returned to the applicant.
Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded
by the applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicantwithin 30 days of notification by the Town.
3.
4.
R
os)gN
F$j
I q'g
3$iE\
Frts
J
,.{(
t-
ql
A
lI
?
A
?
o-t
A.(rc)Y
\\va\g\/
5,S\(-\
ARJf( \-/ \s
F<Qi
H{rOA StGN+R' "=lPX*,s:1 N SG C\J
>,fz=\odln- /l
I L_,4 I Itt- /l
J
\dF
u,
IJ
?\
r.{I
\o\0
v
at
\,
+
\n
?
+rl
o{J
{
3qii
Js
I ,,1a q on7
i36d'--j<qr A \.saJt
\6
J}
J
1-l
v.
Itlf-I
$l
Jrl*t
r-l t
?\t
t-l
/)
A
UJ
./ra
e_od
ll::,j.,.
:
in tlrc
sign betr
window.
At this
like to
, P0st otFtc|Box t3ti van,nloMDo: 81658
i 303/4/6-14t4
be disptayed
our
araised border.
butwe would
i 800/83t-t4t4
o
Project Application
Date
Project Description: Nr',, -'.;'' it' ll, l-'^'. ,,',-"" '-. +L A----",,"'l->(i,,^ (-"ifo't
conracr person and pnone lc^.. --l, A)-. . L,^.^ ^^ /7/4 ^ 73 za t- o;" €/
(i^;1 'co *,lrsn /^ 4?27
Prolect Name:
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
.- ,\ | / r f,-
Lega|DescriptionjLot-'Btocr50.,u,^n(/-)//'//9,/,.'zone6Ll
commenrs: 2// {o,.JA <";l,,v Pd - - tJJ - n.,.r,'lr*i, (.i^l<n
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL D ISA PPROVAL
Town Plan ner taff Approval
SIGN/AWNINC APP
€xPREtg - o
rrvisrd l?i9i9l
( PLease
NAME OF
NAME OF
ADDRESS
NAI4E OF
ADDRES S
Print or
PROJECT
APPLICATIoN DATE ./y'. /O - ?7
'2{ P-
OWNER
- 1,3 A.LL
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL (ATTACH)
FEE: $20.00 PLUS $1.00 PER SQUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA.
1.
z.
3.
4.
5.
6.
pERsoN suBMrrrrNG lDcr,t,na /. lLr<..i,;J,rrnpnoxv, 47b 4B3T
l7l4-R 6laar'ze c+ ; t/ari fn ?tr"s?-
i/ ,, ,nt>- /- . Naxt"a,rnn ,*o*u QZo) lzc- 4513?
SIGNATIJRB OF OWNBR
L,ucArroN oF pRoJEcy taaaresgt y'nc fieals. crh.- SBoE?:c_
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
THE F'OLLOWING INFORMATION IS REOUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE
A.PPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD,
.:,, DESCRIPTIoN oF THE SIGN/AWNING (FR8E STANDING, WALL,
PROJECTING/ ETC), INCLUDE SrcN MESSAGE.
,or,,t os#r,^rc- Cpooe.€-FA.E\ . 2 s(tr9 r *
o
-1?q^r'o.r*. (NlAntgg O*.{)
s. srcN oR AwNTNG MATERTAL t5* 5tGlf,fuA,ln'TuecY
SArupr:aar+fep \ a,r-orpl -p. EeLc*1aT otr lh'
gQoAR€ STega TOBrxlG w/'/+" g'ree L .^rq,LL PCqt6 .
C. SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO
D.
II
gta$ A: ftaso^rrce k '\F"r e :q.1!24.6'(<.zc)- te65
Cr.rnres@.+s(NEre g.8r)- sles B:e z.tas+ (Tornue 5935F)
HET.HT oF srcN ABovE GRADE 8'd'*,*r.
DEscRTBE LTcHTTNG (ExrsrrNc oR pRoposED) N/ft
li' .
c
IT
LENGTH oF BUSINESS FRONTAGE (FT) ,0/4
PAID CHECK NO.DATE
REOUIRED MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
Site Plan
Elevations showing exact locat,ion of sign or
awning on the building
Photographs showing proposed location
Colored scaLe drawing
Sample of proposed materials
Photograph of sign if available
qn edmini
(orEa)
. \
-l.e,c Block Fi]inq
TO: SIGN APPLICANTS
liiren apprications for signs are subnitted, the forlowinginformation is required:
1.
)
A compJ.ered sign/awning applicat,ion (attached) .
t""ij"o3ti:":l:Il"n rhe exacr ]ocarion where rhe sisn
A photograph if possible and building elevation showinr.;the Locarion of the proposea sitn.
:"";:ii3"3lu"tnn which det,aits rhe desisn of rhe srsn,
(a) Colored exactly as sign will be.(b) A list of mateiials t6 Ue-usea in sign (metal,wood, canvas, paint, et,c. )tql phorograph of sign if available.(o) Specific lettering style and size.
Il ll, awning is proposed, submit drawings showinggxggtly how and where t,he awning Ls at,tached to thebuirding and how the awning is io-be constructed.
Description of lighting t,hat wiII be used inconjuncrion wirh irre sign or irning...If pioposing an:ylllg, _I_ighring.is nor'.ri"r"i"io "n.n. rhroush rhe:::l::_i"ni3g 1a,,n1ch carrs undue "tt.niion-;;-;X; "
',usrrless. r.Jr_onrrn.q_T:{ spotlight only the actuaJ. signIettering on ihe awnl-ng.
3.
A
q
6.
l, Sl.:I_:l?l ."d_: - verify sire, heishr erc.L Ee spec]!rc. Vagueness on g::_rnn, -size, construction rnay^ delay the approvil of your sr.gn.3. Measure fronlage of bu;in;s;.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REOUIRED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATIONSUBMITTAL.
-:f rhi-s apprication reguires a separate review by any J_ocal,stare or Federar gs9l"i orher ttui-i'u-r;;-;; i{ir, rheappricarion fee siritt 6e increas.g.oi sioiilo6l 'ixanpr."s of suchreview, rnay include, but utu-n"i-ri^it"J-i"i-iofiraao Deparrmenrof Highway Access pernits, ermy Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shalt b9 lgspolsible_for.paylng any pubJ_ishing feeswhich are in excess of 50t of ine application te6. If, at theapplicant's requestr atry natter is postponed for hearing, causingEne matter to be-re-published, then, th; entiie-tle ror such re-publj_cation shatl be-paid ly t.fre
-apifi"uni. --
Applications deemed by the comrnunity Deveropment Deparrment tohave significant desiin, rand use oi other ii-Jues-wtich may have:^:igllll:?n!.,inpacr 5n rne conmuniry-rniy-rili;; review byconsu-Lrants other that town staff. Sirouia a-aEiermination bemade by the t,own staff that an-outside """""rtJni-is neeaed ro::::.:y-:ly appricallon, conmuniiy oevJr"pin"il;; hire an oursideconsurtant,, it sharr. estimat,e chi amo.,*E crf tnonei necesser), :cpav him or her and rhis amounr ;h"rl-;;'f;;";;;:i ro rhe rown bythe appticanr at rhe rime he fiies hi; -a;;ii;;;i;" wirh rheCommunity DeveLopment Departmeni. Upon comp.tretion of the reviewof the appricati6r oy tnL consutiant, any of,.the funds forwarded:I^:h.: applicant for-paymenr oi-ii. consultant which have noroeen paid ro the consur-Lant, sharl be retughed to ihe appricant.Expenses incurred Fy tre rown in-exgese of the amount forwardedbv the appricanr srritr ue-fiia-lo' trre-roi" iv-tilr-appricanrwithin 30 days of notifi."ii"n Uy .n. Tohrn.
l-_
Proiect Application
i /7 PY
Proiect Name: .l
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing , Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
,'/7 77
DISAPPROVAL3-o
Sum mary:
,l ,, / i.,t lf,t' i. -te /, /,.r_^/2._ _
Town Planner 0 Statt Approval
,ll
1u
$a
0
'lr
X
o.qoi>
Z!l
-F_
4ir.aVJnV
uJri
rL ll
z,t,d7.2tl
rlI
6
.r'
1Jvt\l
u:
u!
a.
.l rs.: .14
,'l s\
't x
uJ llj
\}-I
\!),r{t.i !" iii '4 " :X Y9 ,ltld t: ::
; Nv 'JP
,^l[\jru:
--':XrX
'i $$ $l\rl
{
{
4
.q ,J
r:CU
r, |r)11
;--_- i ;-"o;c i:lli
ltt ut;i0$iI' a.
\tgzQ6d
in v,
-iJ
i .,r
06
7>r*,ZZ
&
l.
$)
\,
i
'0
ci
4\u2
,v
tl
\^-r
\l\
\
a
i{^-
\\
.€* l3-{)
i.-=l
. .q\
**\
ls.'c-..\ -\.t\Nr-S
\--$-+
. t-.\ -\-i\\r-S
\--\S'r
,'---Q
\i
N,
\
RR
_:-\
n\d\\\\N
\\$
$\ N. N\sN
\\
.\
.ri
\
\I
\
N.
\
S
{-\<D('
'|1
AN.t{Lqr$
+
cs(
\.
,v
SIGii APPL ICATIOiI
Da le
-.1:
Phone l!l!!1211
The f oi lorvingto the Oesign
Sign subnittal
subeitial bY the aPPlicant
aocrcva'l can be givel-
-t-p,rrr: p-e tJo.lc rftqP- Lattar e-[itiorr-
{wsr:isrfto b,a' to'- * o+ Uai L '
; sreililte
iaO u
ALso Yeq.^ett Yk g ar -t rao{ I
et)a.trtau bo"rs^ a+ houB-\p..'Jh.^r'a1
Fee Paid 'f eo:t
Name of Project toq-gill
Name of Person Subrnitting
Location of Project (Yl ov i r: l/a C<i r:3rruerare
infor:raticn is requ'i red for
Re,rierv BoarC beicre a final
fee is 52C.00.
A. Sign ilaterial fy1 €-ta-u Strrlc-*c-ree- t-r'r't r-&r
I,Al.^toD4 r ap *-o Mqtc n LUeoo Co lo 4 oR
tra-s b I Fr G.to e.i+ P".lera-bLe-
B. Description ir sign Q/'a.et' ee- ?re{uc+\oD of
c. Si:e of sisn ).{'Y'-8'' = za f
D. Length'ot
F. Comentsthis Peovloas Uaic- Ulgrops pit-h
APPlicetion it'c5er <
C"*r."e
Description of-.project L i3 ht ad U cul u 0 f s+ Lq3
tA tt{YIQ b l'^', tl l'oeai-o z B '^ t'ro Fts '
Cot>C)os , fe.st'auvat-:is, La.,.o y'.ac-r's +po Aftra4bt*s'
{mp au e-c
'is ["os , tl" C.et.fo tatp D of UalL,
I'TATERIALS SueilrrqD l.,ITli APPLICATI0iI
1. Siie Plan2'. diiitings sEffi-Ect loca'"ion
5: Fi'toiogi.pt'tt shor'ring propcssd loc:;ton
4. Aciual sign
5. Colored scale ore''rtnE
-
6. PhotcgraPn ot slgn
Aporoved for DRB Subnit:31
-
bi iupptoued for t)RB Subni -''t: i
-
2s
,/turheD Lept€1
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION I.IILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
APPLICATION
DATE OF DRB I4EETII'IG:
INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED*****
A pre-appljcation meeting with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
determine if any additional informatjon is needed. No application wjll be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning admin'istrator).It is the appiicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE appf ica-
tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the number
of conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL condjtions of approval must
be resolved before a building permjt is issued.
A . PROJ ECT DESCRI PTION : U Ai u oil
4'bufu\-sr [r. e.' Cuu*ea -f{\ a*r rJ 6t R-r,r-ct q p.e
Ct*11 uB. LOCATION
c6'1 U Q 5,
PROPOSAL: 'Lt 't
OF
Address
p"a 6 a-'tt-T-a-L-t i aNs
Legal Description Lot Bl ock Fil jng
Zoni ng
C. NAME OF APPLICANT:
D.
Address
NAME OF
Address
NAME OF OWNERS:
t3 4o4
APPLICANT'S REPR
losn
Llrtcetad L4 $o l bO teleohone 747-ztzL
ESENTATIVE t eAR.(- f*/s-n*,s- n-l
S- t!r r_,o,rc'-r-€( (_ ttJs brcfopft#e lag.Tzzo
vo4 brp C-u.% o t6o telephone 747^zeL
1 be paid at the time a building permit
FEE
is requested.
Si gnature
Address Bo*
F.DRB FEE: The fee wi I
VALUATION
$ o-$ 1o,0oo
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$.50,00i - $ 150,000
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ Over $1,000,000
$ 10.00
$ 2s.00
$ 50.00
$100.00
$2oo.0o
$3oo. oo
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the site
to indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that will be removed
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB visits the
si te.
2. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS will normally'involve two separate meetings
of the Design Review Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. People who fai'l to appear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ i shed.
Project Applicalion
on" ?'/7F /+'z
Proiect Name:
/7tr/,1 I//,1/':12r,'/t, 6"o /) 6rta o"r"
Project Description:/7.npr.r p/Elr {.n2.^a Er*t7u{
X:::::Phone
r3,
Owner. Address and Phone:4r, /j' lt/rc
Architect, Address and Phone:
V'Att '/lil,slm
Legal Description: Lot
/4,?trc/?ryfriu..fi'rr.
Block 5D F,tins Ih// Ui t,+ii i'{ , zone
Comments:
Design Review Board
o^" 1/tt
Motion by:
Seconded by:B Epnr
€{,,D ISAPPROVAL
Summary:
'i,-.ri".. u /'/'2,,-,'/ r'4 /r t'' i'"
' i ''''r -r /'o't
7.,:11/ 1 -./-
D Statt Approval
6'",1"' /v"*'/ -4^ l1cftruvlna,u/ r4trs /p'a'rs-
&tu'//) ,- L"r araa6ptzal futt> * (vztps /,1'/4
=/z/q s
.;"t-r4t
--r;\ttl
lr+c: | -'
Il*o | |\tt
I L /,^
a/z*rS
v.: //rz,J,'/t/al
a> b^ -,'€*llr' 7/'-ta,'.-- AlrX< a, fQ f sr*
//tu"-4il.
t r Cfuahs I u -,/*/u.%,
,// /z //Zr"/*-l/
L a_1
erecrtirn" zg
.-" t t
(Prease Print or rype) Crr,/'ttAryyy|--P^t: . f
NAME oF pRoJEcT -- D' Co'FFE 4'4^/EPq - 2.., t
NA},IE OF PERSON SUBMITTINE J /-'JEI/III€ PHONE-fr9'A6OE_
ADDREss # # UntL urLLaea Tptruspacz lnato CerJreL
NAI"IE OF OWNER
ADDRESS o/ €,a ct, 0P. / 6 tJn,L
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
LOCATION OF PROJECT
DESCR]PTION OF PROJECT
'kJEn /aa
THE FOLLOWING ]NFORMATION IS REOUIRED
APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE REQUEST BEING
REVIEW BOARD.
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGN/A$TNING
PROJECTING, ETC), INCLUDE SIGN
FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE
SCHEDULED BEPORE THE DESIGN
(FREE STANDING,
MESSAGE.
Vll\aag, zhweot;
lrt0'DOCT 2 :l99t
APPLICATION DATE
SIGN /AWNING APPLICATTON
I /t*rn,5t N; ,y't<a
dzuDB.SIGN OR AWNING I,IATERIAL
c.Q T 7F AE'OVERALL SIGN, SIZE OF LETTER]NG AND a/<i €/ r //f/w'
D. HEIG}IT OF
E. DESCRIBE
SIGN ABOVE GRADE
LIGHTING (EXISTING oR pRoPossol a'+ffi
E.
,/\
LENGTH oF BusrNEss FR9NTAGE (ETl TLhTE4IaA //Ud/Utr,J
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL (ATTACH)
FEE: 520.00 PLUS 51.00 PER SOUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA'
PAID CHECK NO.DATEh
ONfr"
00 oc'
+ 3'ot'
t0 oo
1 . Site Pl.anz.
-
El.evations showing exact focation o
awning on the building
3.
-
Photographs showing proposed locati
4.
-
Colored scale drawing
s.
-
Sampre of proposed mater:als
f sign or
on
.X-
r 3.20
Sign edm'inistrator
NL/T
tr
t
TO: SIGN APPLICAI{TS
When applications for signs are submitted, the foltowing
information is reguired:
1. A completed sign/awning application (attached) .
2. A site plan showing the exact location where the signis to be located.
3. A photograph if possible and buifding elevation showingthe location of the proposed sign,
4. A scaled drawing which details the design of the sign,
as follows:
(a) Colored exactly as slgn will be.(b) A list of materials to be used in sign (metal,
wood, canvas, paint, etc.)(c) Photograph of sign if avail.abLe.(d) Specific lettering style and slze.
5. If an awning is proposed, submit drawings showingexactly how and where the awning is aLtached to thebuilding and how the awning is to be const,ructed.
6. Description of lighting that will be used in
conjunction with the sign or awning. If proposing an
awning, lighting is not allowed to shine through the
entire awning which calls undue attention to thebusiness. Lighting nay sPotlight only the arctual sign
lettering on the awning.
RECOMMENDATIONS OR POINTERS
1. Check sign code - verify site, height et.c.2. Be specific. vagueness on design, size, construction rnay
delay the approval of your sign.3. Measure frontage of business.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATTON
SUBMITTAL.
If t.his application requires a separate review by any loca],
StaLe or irederal agency other than the Town of Vail, the
application fee shafl be increased by $200.00. Exarnples of such
review, nay include, but are not Iimited to: Colorado Departnentof Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant. shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees
which are in excess of 508 of the application fee. If' at theapplicant's requesLr any matter is post,poned for hearing, causing
the matter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication sha]l be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed try the Community Development Department to
have significant design, land use or other issues which may have
a significant impact on the community nay require review by
consulLanLs other that town staff. Should a determination be
nade by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to
review any application, Community Development may hire an outsideconsultant, it shalI estimate the amount of money necessary to
pay him or her and this amount shall be forwarded to the Town bythe applicant at the tine he files his application $rit.h the
Conlounity Development Department. Upon completion of the reviewof t.he application by the consul.tant, any of the funds forwarded
by the applicant for paynent of the consult.rnt which have not
been paid to the consuLtant shal.l be returned to the applicant.
Exfrenses incurred by the Town in excess of r he anount forwarded
by the applicant. shall be paid to the Town by the applicantwithin 30 days of notification by the Town.
r'. . trnL:.LL I
11.,'3.1 /93
i LL . .:, J.l-tJbrJ-:,4,1 :1 Lrii- r.l .t- ' JJ iI:i,J
+++ R,EALSLEY
rir:J . U 1U r ..r.)
05 @ 003,,00r
.Un L r. r- E- |
1tl:18
rilL/
$1 Iurlrlel' Inil.
PAGE I DATEoF1
"5'f ""
11-24-92
ROBYN BALSLEY
WHIRI,EY INDU9TBIES, INC.
WATS: 600.?C5-1959rE! 903-665-8223
FAX: 303-656-5829
ReglonolSoles Otfr@:
213e DOGWOOD ClRCl,.E
Lour$vlLLE, co 80m7
D'COFFEE
ATTN: JAN
EOI GORE
VAiL. CO
BEANERY
l\|ERING
CREEK DR #B
81657 lA)(l
Phonei 303-479-0608
lmprint D:C0FFEE BEANERY
Art No: 0-41797 Otyr
Copies: C.C0!I|ARR0/CINDY
Speclal Inctructions:
THIS ARTWORK PLUS ORDEF Q
approval and mrrfirmation, Plsar
Item snd Gotor:
Gomponcnt Colons;
lnk Colors:
T-90 20 OZ THERI4O MUG SANDSTONE
SANDSTONE
GREEN-562
1000 |
; PRODUCTAI{D COLOR SPECIFICATIONS arE your
any quesiions that mey br ll#ed (or attecfied) and note conections ftf
to ehip and Invoice smell tnrhUons (whtcfi
four weeks aficr ncript of llnal approvdl dt artwork and produalon autrorization. Larger orders may takr iongcr.
IMPORTANT: ART lS NOT sHowN FULL SlzE.
'DOTB.iARE FOR ELACK &WHITETONE ONLY.
YOUR JOB VV|LL PRII.IT IN TT{E CORBECT COLORS AI{D WTTHOUT SIMULATED "DOTS".
-41 tlG 11-&92
.b
!a !a
Acil, Celohde.:Aail, Aohhde
for order insFuofons
[connecrioNs/coMMENTs r
shlpASAP
oo
r4olfz
/tso /rr flnt&zrSsrrs
Cntw,wt-- lhr
' .u,225
/t/t ,Au**ttP rtuv//
{,qr*
, prtr t$'r 4 &tr.l 4
-{
HIB}TECH SIGNS^
Quality at Budget Prices
JAYARY 5, 1993
CINNAMCT.ITiTY BUNS
201 @RE CREEK DRN/E AgT B
\rArL, CQ 81657
ATIN: JAt{
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD INFOR},IATION:
AIIO{ED SQUARE FWTAGE 3 SQUARE FEEf,.
SIGN SHALL BE SAT.IDBLA.STED REDgrcOD' MUBLE FACED.
ONE FACE TO BE CINMI4O}INY BIJNS IOGO' TTTE REVERSE TO BE
DICOFFEE BEANERY IOGO
COI.ORS SIIALL BE IVORY FOR BI,,ASTED AREAS, AND TEAL FOR
TEXT AND BACKGROUND AS SHCMN. '..4
SIZE- OPTION A - CIJP WITH SMOKE 22.5' WIDE X 19' HIGH
ffiffi
BRACKET TO BE
SIIJ'ER/
AL,/ YEflI METAL BEI}T3
BflI3TTEffi{:f.8il. DE@RATTVE
J7*an{
,/,- /
)
P.O. Box 2688,Vai, CO 81658 o Production Center: 910 Nottingham Rd., S-2, Avon, CO 81520
Eagle / Summit Counties: fi3.949-4565 . Aspen / Glenwood Springs: 303.945-5695
FAX: 303.949-4670
-Tt n D{vq,J
{+tJo.c.tE-D A/24 TTtf LErry,rz,wc- Jf/t4 (r?.+t'xnA),
*(-'
Qt',t.V\ \\,/
rcfz{>-
JA'S: D' cu,qrri 8E4u0t-,7
(J-* utt*'t;t'-L*)
f/f{ L.Lrtutlc- (atL,.-tL ( saz r--). 4P> 7v€ frn=zz<- {/r*-F<.
(>tcrtol aa.a) 7V y'E u!6D <','-t Tffi ,,(1-""t7,*tc41 , Ptr-+lt
L6.r /h€ 1<+tztL.t lF ,*au, ft-*lf /-^r7 q)uEJho.J-s oA tf /au
/J,{Eb A,,tf 1th^t c- F-f*rtit 64"'-,^-, m/f ,
/-4.\'t:-
4.e e D.t 7, ?,ry Kt?lt?, o ? 2 R S ??t lno t E ? e
t2345678?0
lane Berrand
(303) 789_0533 FAX (303) ?89_0803
.F
t
oF=&.!{J\lJ +Z frJ ?-{ :!-r(5@=JJ>
irJo eo
-oOZ.trJ
==4FFI\
I J.:: -t,| ,- . ,',.li- : .,. t..lg, -ljj '<...l
\-, r.: -,t O\r-tl . .': Sl
! i*-- g o)
(!
F-c).c)
a_>14Jo_
EaII
B
E,
&ql@9
B sE
E€iggE
PE€r53 E
Ig$s
D.(D\T
Project Application
i,u////au//
projecroescription. l/eUt €t4/U2 (2 7// fpanlft Fo f,qst lr,zuqEf fl,U,,sra^eUfion tVra t
t
ltt l/uWr .1'/AtshraAfut' [.ttv/H''GrFr{Proiect Name:
Konr""t
person and enone JAtl lrf"il/il7 d0/ D (bEZ OzttL AZ ' r b
. -.. , - I (o ,e ^ q7?' a6o8 ot /7/-76t/
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecl, Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptio n, tor*-'" '--. ,i"r ';" , Fiting l/nt Utt'tEt /ar , zon" 4tg, 4g-
Com ments:
Design Review Board
,^" ,/frt
Motion by:rtr,q(
Seconded by:
/-a G'nsrPf //fzo'tT'DISAPPROVAL
summary: t : t) ?t frz'trcfiu! frftv
z.\ 5n Eozz'
r7z/ Bz.lFP *zrArs fl/ltkFartze,/t'rf .42r.4</./ rz>
E statt Approval
Sit -,1model A
Bttowze-
t
I
J
I
l
I
i
Rtc'D$EP 501993
Ij
. AllPERSAllDSIUD|0S, lllC GrophcDesisn ffFIl A,,., , I l, : 3l55t.Poul Streer,Denver,t080206
\103388-1211
/
23 Apdl 1991
Mr. Mike Rose
Town of Vail
Public WorkdTransportation Department
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
re: llay l, DRB Review, Vall Transportatlon Genter, SlgnagdGraphics
Dear Mike,
Please find attached 2 sets of drawings lor DRB outlining recommendations and
revisions to lhe WC signage.
Based on our meetings with you, and our wolk during the schematic design
phase we have reached the iollowing conclusiom and recommendalions:
'l. Colors on signs and wall graphics should be revised:
The colors at the top levels (4 and 5) orthose vbible lrom the village shouH be
changed lrom oranire and red lo a dark green or acceptrable earth tones.
Colors can get brigtrter as you go down levels or where they are not visible from
the Village. (see illuslration) We recommend pql using Yellow.
2. Designs for new animal figures would be used on each level.
3. New irientification signs for the Transportalion Center ( individual letters) uould
rephce the existing brighl green lD sign
4. Change white (phstic) PVC sign Parhng and Fxit 1'x I'to
Medex (wood) Park and Exit 1' x 6' background color to be the level color.
5. Replace small pededrian guide signs (1' copy) with hrger simple messages
ie: Vdil Village/Ariow (6' copy) or Symbols (see illustration). Use backs of pa*irtg
and exil signs for these messages where appropriate.
6. Use better symbol for stairs (see illustration) All doors to be painted level color
before new symbols are applied.
7. A guidelinefor retail signage will be established along with improvements for
directories and in$ructional signage and Transpoilation inlormation once a
preliminary budget and phasing is determined and apprcved.
Respectfully,
r-ll-\ ,/./
-tzz+t--(rzt',+-David Clune
John Kjos
DC/me
enclosure
tr
Town of Vail Signage lmprovement Program
April 1991
Vail Transpottation Centet
Sionaoer/Graphics
WaiiGdthiAb Recommendations and Cost Estimate
Wall GraohlcsPfiid o'n ;nA walls and pedeslrian exits as shown below:
Level 1
Cost per Level
Design Development $
Fabrication and Inslallation $.
April 1991
Vail Transportation Cenler
H'#g*g,ffiliH" and cosr Esrimares
P7 Pedeetdan Gulde/Ulalltway lD Slgns
Replace existing
3O'x3O'PVC
Panels
Add pedestrian guide
messag€ to backs ol
pad</exit signs
€Vail
E MBEEI
ALTERNATIVE
Re-use white PVG
panels for ped. gulle
signs wall mount
Cost per Lwel
Design Developrnent $
Fabrication and Instalhtbn $.
oltrrob|!iLd o.br
P8 Door lD Slgns
- scorchlite VDC
- Doorpainted lwel cobr
- New svrnbol for
Stairs up and Stairs down
Cost per Level
Design Development $
Fabrication and Instalhtion $
April 1991
Vail Tra mportatio n Cenler
Sionaoey'GraphicsC&t Estimat'es and Becommerdations
P5 Vehlcular Dlrestional
h6plic'i-Jxi6tin-|iEElift'oopy on wtrile PVc(plastic) sigm with Medex(wood) signs described below:
Existinq Siqn:
1'x 8' FVf(attached in 3 phces)
Beplace Yield and Watch for Ped signs wilh
poit mounteO sign/syrrbol at cross walks
Strire walks
New sign:
- 1'x 6' Medex (attach 2 places)
- 1/2" Medex
- Paint backoround level color -. .
- Coov Whitd Reflective VDC
- Cable Mounl to Concrete T
- Center Sign over Driving lane 24' x 24' post mouted signs
Coet per level
Design Developmenl E
Fabrication and lnslal|ation $
'"1*@ @
@@
@@
Ol!|!r b !.r lva cdqr
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
Add srnaller Pedestrian
Gost per level
Design Dwelopmenl $
guide sign m€ssages
e@o
Fabrication and lnstalhtion
89lt' lz0 xol I tzl'08t ouo{daPl
7?ts a/ 2JA *'
9g79g91 raruog lao{S'riSte 'uQsoO rydrC / .tdl,SOFntS g}fiSUdW
t pll
lh/Y ^
,.9T.r5
trJ
J
pqs
891il20 roj Itzt 88r auqdqat 90208 0l'ro u00,Fa{s $ 5 tt ,u0ts00 \dug / )ill 5orcrus 0ilvsulduf
I
gFNfuVJ 2ee2 ,, ,q.. lLh *,
iilqdoig/a0ou0g :Ftuo) uopopodsuorg po1
rhf
1*s
ri$
j
$$t
i$N
(-I,' ll
Lr'-- -- -'
pqs / EHw
8ilt'tztfol ttzt'sge0rqdqol 90208011a/wa010qsrsste'lj0!sa0lqdus / xl,torcrusowsltdtv
,rpil
tbft w
uDrl llDA
\
\
.o
I
I
I
iz
l1
:l
al
9.'r.lli
-t-
@
JI!t
!il
te
..-a:-
)..
')
l; 5al,P i.t'.
i-n, '!i!' .
irf
'-:
,T'
nit0l
.ro
::r1!
t.
;F
I itit;
I
I[/n
!
:*j
;F
1'.l3
i.
IJ
gglt f-Zt rl t Ut SSS *qlrpf COAS O1 'rarua6 1ae6 6 S 16 'u0poq rqdoq / :fff ,OfOruS OWSUldtl
pqs
85tt tn ml I tzt 889 ouqdqai
24/dv/b aUrAepl
90209 0)'ra\uag'la04S U Ste'uqsaqt{drS / ltt,SOtOtUS qltvggdfy
elol
s{qqnr tL/4 *
.A\l-l
I
3t
o-l
+lF.
..4-
91.'r.llt
-t-
,-.L-,iil*l
\
\
\
-\
II
lexls
851,'l.zt xDl t tzt 8m auoqdaPl
+ n?ffi*
Q/H4W? 42urY)
9g79g 61 teauaq 'roo{s rs s tg '!Qss0 tqdwg / )ilt totcJus oltysrtdwtt
$10[
ioqr^,tr tb/+ epo
s)rqd0lC/000u0g5 :roluo) uolioUodsuDrl tlDA
\
i
,.--. \'rD \
-t \
:l 1\;t Ii
Fl 'l \rrF | \l
Eli :{ \
€D\
i'\
I
rf -,
,, ?]
,r' if-'
':- il, -{lll '.i'
l-
I i.; r.
SStt'tzt rDJ ltzt'0$ qqdqol 90z0go'rsrrt 100{s 6sts '/0$s0rg0', / n,soFrusowsuaw
tpl
t|ls ; E4flu 'qfr tb/, {ql
?zur?? s)tqd'lg/a0ou0r5 :$tuo) uoltouodsuort ;p1
J1l-
qi
@
a
.idl0 trl
lir 3rsl
dEl
I
zl.
cli
al'
/rAt;t .i\lrl
litrs
Project Application
o, fr./
h,
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
c,/2_,
Adr UA q)q- 2rt/
Owner, Address and Phone:
Archilect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
el,st
/,2t
B lock Filing
/ u.
rA
Design Review Board
La'^7
APPROVAL
Date
Molion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPBOVAL
--/
Town Planner E Statt Approval
I
I
:ti'l'
APPIJCATION DATE
8IGN,/ITNI NC IPPIJICITTON
(Please Prlnt or $Pe)
NN{E OF PRq'ECI
NN{E 08 PERSON SUBUITTING PHONE
ADDRESS
NN,IE OF
troxrTunE ol
I.OCATION O8
OWNER oNEs.f3-g-fe_
ADDRES9
I I tt n^ \GorrtFFrrr \ /, | [r'r.." I -,-..^t -'rr,-1r.. kr.a \ Qlr\€ u'-
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECI Nr '' , o
'tt
{ \ €' fli't"t " '*' r\o
THE FOLTTWTNG INFORI{ATION IS BF.qUI3ED rol-9-!'!IlrrArJ Br THE
APPLICNII PRIOR rO rHg nsouesT BEING ECHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGII
REVIEI{ EOARD.
A' DEscRrPTroN oF THE srGN'/AwNrNG
PROJECTING, ETC}, INCI,UDE SIGN
(FREE BTNIDTNG, llALrJ,
I{ESSAGE.
B.SIGN OR AWNING UATERIAI,
c. SrzE oF ovER,ALr, sIGN, SrzE OF IJTTERTNG AIID I'GO
D.
8.
IIEIGHT OF
DESCRIBE
SIGN ABOVE GRADE
T..IGIITING (EXT8IINC OR PROPOSED)
F.
G.
H.
tENCTlt oF BUSTNESS FnoNTACE (Er)
CoNDot{INIt}tASSOCIATION APPROVAL TAITACHI
$20.00 FEE PAID
-
CIIECK I
1.-2.-
3.
-
ll .-3.
-
6.-
Slte Plan;i;;.ii;E Bhowlng exact locatlon of slsn or
awnlng on the butldlngii'dl'diriirti st ouing-lioposea locatlon
Cotoria -rcale drawlnE
Saup1c of ProPoced Daterl?lE- -i[ologttP]iot- slgn lf avatlablc
Project Application / /
\/ t r\ r (, D"" Z/t ?/fr)
proiecrName: Var l /arl(rn ,^ )1v.r1u* 'S,Trtttr€
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Don *o r,/
seconded ort ln^ 4
APPROVAL
</- 0
Dale
Motion by:
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:th({/oo-
fkt ".1u..*-pn/L,'eu.A *, b* -<-, /u *./,J
L Lltd-t,44\p\J
J,dtt<Jt,
[/a,c
n-.Ox- 4( 2 t1 '11/'\' 2-d < t't QAIL .
Riz; Ltl'PAil7gX5', pAt{T6t{t.rj!-rofvr. zsf' r22cJ54C
.''-Vrii ,1 ; t,i,,,
i i ; ,i i '. il/ \-,'( I !"'
t', .. '' ' '
-'-'' i '' ' ''i l
F.{,,1 L t'. (, /. | /i y
ti:f .L. 't' 't \ L4-ra'-
F t)^ i]..'',- 1''| / il
f 'la v< "lf It'o' ''
Jllt' / '
/ f/: "'' ' ,-i''t''i,''r..,-l 11'''t" l't.) /
rl/
<,Lr, /,- a.t 1rL\r
7t
,,'
,-ta r'1, Iltr''-'''' -1t (-)/ L' 1' \ 1/'
Vail Parking Structure Signage
9/L9/9o Design Review Board Meeting. The signagte was presented
here for the first tine by Scott ward of Michael Barber
Architects. Betsy Rosolack was the staff liason. The
staff had not had an opportunity to review the signage
before the meetJ.ng.
LO/3 Scott Ward met with Mike Mollica and Shelly ltello to show
the changes made that had been suggested by the Design
Review Board. Mike and Shelly made additional
suggestions for changes to the signage.
Lo/Lo Scott Ward rnet with Betsy to review the changes he had
made to the sign proposal . Betsy told Scott that the
staff needed to review the proposal and must see the
proposed colors before they could give Barber the go
ahead on production, and that if production was started
without Corununity Developrnent authorization, it was at
Barberrs own risk.
LO/LS Betsy called Scott to ask for the color samples.
LO/L6 Staff neeting. Staff deternined that the proposal needed
to go back to the Design Review Board and also made
suggestions.
Lo/L7 Interdepartmental neeting. Stan met with staff and
discussed their reguests.
Lo/Lg Design Review Board neeting where approval was given with
conditions and changes.
vail Parking Structure Signage lo/L7/9o
The staff received color samples on LO/LG and met to discuss the
program.
The staff agreed with the DRB in the followinq:
1. The colors should be more subtle. Maybe the red could be a
deep red, the green a greyed ftreen' the yellow a gold, etc.
2. The animal thene should be retained.
In addition, the staff felt:
L. That the directional signs should be trirnmed (cut off)
so that no excess material remains.
2. The logo for Vail as used in the Lionshead Transportation
Center should be used on the Vail Parking Structure sign
at the main entrance.
3. The word rrcenterrr should be added to rrVail Transportationrt
LO/L7 fnterdepartrnental Meeting
Stan agreed:
1. The directional signs would be trimmed off.
2. The colors should be resubmitted
With regard to using the V logo, Stan explained that the Design
Review Board had discussed this at a meeting early in the year, and
had felt it would be better to keep the signage without the logo.
He disagreed with the addition of the word, rrcenterr', stating that
this added confusion with the transportation center which was the
bus tenninal .
VAIL PARKTNG STRUCTURE SIGNAGE
This went to DRB on 9/L9. The staff had not had tine to see it.
The Design Review Board made some changes, then gave approval to
all proposed signs with the exception of the signs which identify
the sections and leve1s of the structure. The following
conditions apply:
,.'L. The lighting shall be made a warmer tone.
2. The identification sign for the identification of various
sections and levels of the parking structure should be
,' nodified and presented to the staff for approval . The DRB
"L felt the two circles should be made one circle and reduced in
size (they were presented at 18") and the colors should be
more subtle. Ned preferred using the animal therne.
3. ceorge suggested painting thg i$entifying qolors<--ogt lhl Sxlt -ui.-and entfancg doofs. tn St ,(z ,i 4J- 517- ''4 cr--' - >c c tt fa')i aA\ ra r-
,,. tl ,.* =.-f "l .,4 n...d. | '
4...1 The interior directory signs would be changed to elirninate the\ addition of a large arrow, and arrows would be placed next to
6Z'each item on the list.
/ '' ,"1
Srnall identification
be placed on the eastbe reduced in size.lighted due to their
The consultants agreed to
signs for the information center would
and west and the sign on the south would
These three signs would not be halo
srnaller size.
make the requested changes.
\rr
\\
.,/ IL. 1n-,, (l b"a C cL t'r*
,r{,.:i .[ ,- )"'-'''{
f2to lno^DwAY sullE 600 otNvEt cor.oR^oo so1o3.5(06 rlltphoN€ 303 g3t orlt fAcs|M[r lot alr 0600 , ";r
- 1
'l ) "(+l
?t. ,x) a7!45 l'llctnEL BffiBER ARCH,(P.?/3
|||lciltil. 8t[8tr A[[tilttcrl,rt
VAIL TNANSPOFTATION CENTERPROJECT NUMEEB 22209
MEETING MINUTES
TOWN OF VAtuDEStqN REVTEW BOARO
Date ol Me6tlng: lg September 1990uare ot tssue: 20 geptember lgg0
Locetlan: Town ol Valt
Attendees: Deslgn Revlew Board:
Town ol Vail: i g. Berryman
Weber Destsn: g:ff;:n,
MBA: S. Ward-'
Prepared by: Scott Ward '
The Deslgn Revlew Board's. maln concems wirh .tho slgnage package aspres€nled sre rhar too much emphasrs rs ptaced on th-e oiuh".J ,ti f,ep_:99:tll1" stsnase and rhe..amoLnt or pldc-"r-LqurreJ rJi;;;-"b""i;urrnecessary. A rnore shnpllstlo approach io tln signage ls deslred.
The requ€sts ot the Dsslgn Revlew Board foratrv€ ro the srgnege package are:
.01 Dhec'tlonar/lnrornrailonar sJonase - comblne alr fnrormailon o' one srgn.Revlse and resubmlt lor Desb;l Revtew goaro 6talf approval.
'02 Pedestdan Exterror Entry grgnage - combrne e[ hilolm'tron on of* rlon.Reduce scate and corlr firen-sity t;b" 'dtl;; ;il';il;i.il I
Deslgn Revlew Board stall approvat. -.v'-' '€Hl' '"'
'03 vehrcufar Dhectionar and palkingAow crEarance slgnage .. proceed w,th
:lgnage as pres€nrsd pro/ded-inat att lnioimatron rg combrned on one | - - r
stgn.
.04 Bus Route ldentificatlon 0lgnage _ prooeed as presented wllhoutsrccpa.,n /
Mafn Entry gfgnage - proceed wlth ratsed fener, neon.back llr slgnage. **.:*:*,!ev !'r.,r rqrDrlv lr!'lrEt, nson. oacr( lll glgnag6. ry',,
^JJ\€=:: 4 \.
Il:ffjlaoyl^lgnqgr slonage - procecd wlrh rebed rener, n€on bac,(lil slgnage. Locate the sl-gn cenrered on rhe north erevailon beneath rhe
excefllon
.05
.06
softlt.
2t ,9@ 07'06 t'tICFtAEf_ BffiEER ARCH*P,3/3
Vail Transportetlon Qenter
Moeilng Mlnutes
1g September 1gg0
Pege 2
.07 Inlomatlon center $lgnage - proceed with raised letter neon back lil
slgnage on the nodh elevbtlon., proceed wlth down $lzed rals€d lsltor
slgnage wllhout back llght at th€ south. sest and wsst elevarlon,
NorEr For all neon back ilr stgnago, reduce ths Int€nstty ot ths neon llght to. sttah the warmest whlte llght posslble.
These meetlng minutes r€flect our undsrsrandlng of subleots discussed and
declslons reached. Please advlse us of any corrictlons 6r addltlons.
ACTION ITEMS
.!eE Sublea
.01 DkealonaUlnlormatlonal. glgnage
,O2 Pedesrlan Exterlor Entry Slgnage
sWlmh
$vanmeelmh,drb)
co: All AttendeesMBA: M. Berbor
C. Thomas
Vaun 22289
I
F-esponsjb.ill$ Date Due
MBA A.S.A.P.
MBA A.S.A,P.
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
stan Berrlman, Kristan Pritz
Cornnunity Development Departnent
October 18, 1990
Vail Parking Structure Signage, Design Review Board
Meeting of Lo/L7/9O
The Design Review Board reviewed the proposed changes to the
signage and approved then with the following conditions:
1. Remove the slash narks between the letters and nunbers.
2. The two additional colors will be resubuitted. These must be
more subtle colors. For example, the red should be muted to
perhaps a cranberry. The orange perhaps a russet, etc.
3. The board felt that it was inportant to naintain the aninal
theme that existed on the original structure. At the same
time, they recognized the need to have the signage in place
when the structure opened in Novenber. They asked that the
aninal thene be expanded to the new part of the structure and
to the pedestrian entrances as soon as possible. Stan
Berrynan agreed with the board and stated that he would pursue
this-and that it probably could be done within a two-year tirne
frame, working with Aurpersand.
The staff asked that any additional excess naterial on the
directional sigms be trinned off. They also felt that the extra
btank board would encouragte graffiti and vandalisrn.
f I { '/)t^-'
\.*')rf vU v
\\,.",of,o S."/ bt^-J''nA.tr/ o,fl- J^-
G1Xt',rt=1 -'/f,a,f -4 /^ ,- /=.K r/2..1,-y'' o 2
cg-.r.- eo / at- o /.- L- r, , /r- --Ztw"r/ - /z /l-
yrrt-/. -L c-*(^_ r *?-{"
un L^,-,7
1of/r "1^r// *8"^^;--t' 7v*bu 4^ ? o b*.L +, O'L-6
,,,
'.'II
APPI,ICATION DATE
aIGN/TTNINO TPPLTCITION
)
r-t1 - z\oo
PROJEgI
OF PRqTECT
THE FoLITWING INFoRI'iATIoN Is BEAUIEED FoR aUBIiITTAL' BY rBE
epif,rCAnt PRIOR To IttE REQUEST BEING SCI1EDUL;ED BEFoRE rHD DESIGII
REVIEW BOARD.
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE
PRO'ECTING, ETC) '
srGN/Al,fNrNG
INCLUDE EIGN
(FREE STANDING, I{ALIJ,
I{ESSAGE'
{l*"3; II*,?1"3' ryt" Vn, \ T^.+"'+4"^
NN'rE oF pERsoN suBt{rrrrNc ['\l\(e -Rol.f pnoueAfl9-Zt.l3
ADDRESS
NA}IE OF OIINER
ADDRESS
SIONTTURE OT
I'CATION OF
DESCRIPTION
orx8R
B.srcN oR AwNrNc uArERrAr,B\bEJ- t\,\e+A\ /PIFS+lc -' ll
c. srzE oF oVERALL SrGN, AIZE OF IJTTERTNG A}ID r-Go
D.
E.
ITEIGHT OT
DESCRIBE
SIGN ABOVE GR,ADE
IJGHTING (EXISUNG oR PROPOSED)
r.
G.
H.
t.ENGTtt oF BUSTNESS TRONTAGE (rr)
CoNDottINIlrl{ ASSOCIATION APPRoVAL (ATTACHI
920.O0 FEE PAID
-
CHECK I
1
2
3
1
3
6
Slte Plan;i;;"ii;B Ehowlng exact locatlon of s!'gn or
awnlnq on the bullding
il;;Gtilns--sr,owrng pioposed locatlon
color;d icale drawing
Sanple of ProPosed uaterlals -ifi"iograprr- of- elgn lf available
+t.,, /8t'/o/'
/\/ / t,'L- /
c{trec-7'r tt''
o
//+/</7/Dale I / -/L,I
Project Application
Sr
A r'V<-. (1t< ,srr-.f'uo
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Conlact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
fu't--2,,
, Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
APPFOVAL
./7q -o
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
D statt Approval
;tt i.r
l|!lct|lt[ BIRBIR tn0ll lllcTufit 1.. .
l lt' 1i.'
,,rr,{ ''', | '''| '-'' r'\ \-';28 February 1991
Mr. Mike Rose
Town of Vail
Department of Public Works/Trans.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 816s7
RE: Vall Transportatlon Center
Lane Indicator Lights-DRB
Projea Numbet 2?289
Dear Mike:
1l
,t1
il
' r l'-.'
,,
tr
't,.tI
1
I '. t..
t'This letter is in response to your letter of 25 February '1991 regarding the r l
design review board's approval of the lane indicator lights at the main entry. I
ln Kristan Pritz's letter dated 27 February 1990, final approval was given for the
Vail Parking Structure Expansion, provided the following conditions have been
met.
1. Main entry columns should be scaled down.
2. Bevise the light fiKures on top of the columns.3. Public parking sign to read 'Vail Parking'4. Presentation of the signage package.
All conditions outlined by Ms. Priu have been addressed and incorporated into
the final design by Michael Barber Architecture. No mention of revising entry
lane indicator lights as presented was required by Ms, Pritz, furthermore, the
lane indicator lights were shown on the approved signage package at that time.
No mention of revision to the lights was addressed.
Please find the attached drawings indicating the revisions as we understood
them to be required for final approval.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL BARBER ARCHITECTURE
t{dtuhrl
Scott Ward
SWard/km
(c:Vdl\lil.ltr)
Enclosures: Kristan Pritz letter dated, 27 February 1990.
Design review board approval of 3'l January 1991.
Two garage entry elevation dtawings.
Entry Elevation Presented with Signage
cc: MBA: (1) F. Walicki, (21 Vaun 22289
MICHAEI. BARBER ARCHITECTURE PROFESSIONAT CORPORATION
1290 BROADWAY SUITE 600 DENVER COLORADO 80203-s606 TE|-EPHONE 303 837 0555 FACSTMILE 303 837 0600
75 soulh f;onlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 47$2138
(303) 4792139
108 H0.
0rrgnrl tl:Vnult:._ r'
Cantr!.1- _-___-_
lifR0: __._...- ,_._ ...
8[: .---_* _
Mrrlclir::
Ccpics:
-,_--.
offlce ol communlty developmenl
project will bean upcoming
February 27, L99O
Ms. Kathy HarhaiMichael Barber Architecture
1290 Broadway, Suite 600Denver, Colorado BOZ03
RE: Design Review Board Approval of Vail Village parkingStructure
Dear Kathy:
on January 31r L99o' the.Design Reviehr Board gave final approvalto the vail virrage parking structure expansi6n with the -
foll.owing condition:
l-. The signage, entry and lighting for thepresented to the Design Review Board atmeeting as soon as possible.
The rnotion was made by pat Herrington and seconded by Ka.thyWarren. The rnotion received approval 3-0.
The concerns with the parking structure entry included thefol lowing:
L. The architecLure had too rnuch of a period look.The light fixtures on top of the coiurnns were notappropriate. The height of the entry columns should bescaled down. The rights would look rnore appropriate ifthey were placed on the column wall as opposea- to thetop of the column.
2. r The public parking sign shalL be changed to read Vailparking.
3. The hourglass stair on the east side of the niain staircorridor shall be slightly adjusted so that the wallsparallel each other. (I think you understand what fan talkjng about. Thls is very dlfficult to describein writing. )
4. Snowberry, honeysuckle and cottoneaster should not beused as shrubs for the project.
At this tirne, r have scheduled the project for the March 7thDesign Review Board nreeting. rf this 6ate is not acceptableplease let me know. The next DRB neeting woul-d be on March 21st.rf you have any questions please feel free to carl at 47g-2L3g.
Sincerely,
\/ ^l r,,\
lttfhii{iTn'Kristan Pr'itzActing Director
Connunity Developnent
KP/PP
cc: Stah Berryman
Projecl Application
il)\i
Prolect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Archilect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Filing
-
Taaa
Best
copy
Available
Comments:
Design Review Board
rr.- I
Motion by: 1I'|{Ir'' l'
seconded or, \1i :'Ll r
Itrr /(ir'rOate | | ,l | '.'
t
DISAPPBOVAL
t\
Summary:
E Statt Approval
t€r'd .l=tr=r't = r : I t-'t H r I€-!==-€t=:|l-t5r5=cr
-j
)
\!l
OL
Ja
G
u{)
AJU
$At
t
oB(\)
;
z
Ho
\JO
o
I(a
.,':
I
it
e
Ia
eo..\
1
AJ\
{v
a
ut
0
Ps
-g
2
p
ds
.J
o
.:
o
i,
.:l
' :,i'
i-
i:
''''l
\FIL E
o
c
otlice ot communlty dqclopment
OPY
lnwn
75 loulh hontage ro.d
Yall. coloiado 81657
(303) 47$2138
(sr3) f?$2139
Dlarch 21, 1991
!Ir. Scott ward
Dtichael Barber Architecture
l29O BroadwaySuite 6OO
Denver, co 80203-5606
Dear scott:
I am writing this letter in response to your letter dated
February 28, 1991 concerning the tane indicator lights at tbe
main entry. I feel it is necessary to correct the history of
this project. As I stated in my February 27, 1990 letter, on
January 31, 1990, the Design Review Board_qtave-final approval to
the val-1 Village'Parking Structure Expansion with the following
condition:
1. The signage, entry and lighting for the project will be
presented-to the besign Review Board at an upconing neeting
as soon as possible.
on ltarch 7, 1990, the entry for the VaiI Village Parking
Structure was approved. The approved drawing fro:n Michael Barber
Architects is dited March 7, 1990. At that meeting, there atas no
discussion of the indicator lights. In fact, the Design Review
Board approval stated: 'rlighting and signage to be reviewed by
Design Review Board at a fater date.rt Please see the attached
Uarch 7, L99L DRB approval sheet.
In addition. when the signage for the entire Parking Structure
was reviewed, there was no information on the indicator lights in
the submittal package.
i Mr. Scott Wardltarch 2L, I99]-
Page 2
Uy purpose for outlining the sequence of events here is to
enphasize that these lights were never discussed at Desigm Review
Board level . I believe we can rectify this situation by bringing
the proposal to the Design Review Board at their April 3rd
neeting.
If you have any further questl-ons about this iten, please feelfree to contact me. Once again, f believe the issue can beresolved. However, I think it is inportant to nake sure that thehistory of the project is accurate.
Sincerely,
{"irfon l-'\
Kristan Pritz
Cornmunity Developnent Director
/abEnclosurecc: Mike Rose
Project Application
Project Name:
Proiect Oescription:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecl, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
L"e't-Vli ""," 3i)1?O
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL V SISAPPROVAL,t / iL-1,- | /
aa''