HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5C LOT A B C LODGE AT VAIL INTERNATIONAL 1996 APPEAL OF DRB DECISION PART 1 OF 2 LEGAL �ast Villag� Homeowner5 Assoc �7U6275HS6 0�/Q3/1936 02 : 43:2� PM P_2
_ E�,s� VrLL�� H()MEOWNFRS A�SS�i.tATI�N, Ir��c.
Officers: President - B.�b C`ral��n Secrekary - Gretta Pa�°ks Trcasurcr - Patnck C;ramm
I?irectors - luditlt B��kgwitz - Dollah Briclgewater - Ellie Ca�•ikins - Ron Lan�tley - Bill Morton - Cprvtie Ridder
To: Vail Towr�Council
Fram: Jim Lamortt, Executive Director
Date: May 3, 1996
RE: Appeal of Design Review Roard Deeision
Lodge at Vail International Wing
The Eiorneowners Association finds that the proposed remedy for the ir�terconnection of
thc proposed Lodge at Vail International Wing does not achieve an accepta�ile degree of compati-
hility with surroundin� prc�per-ties.
Further, there appears to bc sufficient evidence to indicate that the pr�posed interconnec-
tion does nc�t conform to the terms and conditians of the Lodge at Vail condominium declara-
tions. The design that is aecepted by the Tawn Counci] should not create a conflict with the
reQuirements pf the condominsum declarations.
As has been rriade known in prior public hearings regarding this project, the Homeowners
Association ibelieves that there is a more acceptabte solutior� than the present propasal. It is our
position that there shauld be a reconf guration of�e proposed International Wing, allowing the
building to be diminished in size and height, while permitting the developer to regaining the lost
building area on the adjacent I,and Exchange Site.
The Homeowners AssociatiQn urges ihe Tawn Council ta reject the �esign �,�view Board
decision antil such time as a more appropriate solution is found for the interrelationship and ir�- I
terconnection with sunounding buildings. '
cc: Tom M�orhead
Posl Office�3ox 238 Vail,Colorado 8 t 658
'Ceiephone:(970)827-5680 NlessagelFAX:(970)827-SSSb
,
. MAY-07-1996 13�22 �JCFKK � P.01�0�
�ACObS COvER SFIE�T
C.I1AS E �
F�ICk Td: Holly McCutchcan (970) 479-2157
KLFiN kop� �riority handling instructions: X Aeliver immediately
_ Deliver within 2 hrs.
� Fram: Ann B,Fri�k
�►E«Ey D�te: May 7,.]996
LtG Number pf Iyages(inc�uding cover sh�et) 6
A77DlNEyS AT LAW prig1nal document(s): _ WEII foIlow
_ in the mail
� ovemight delivery
Wi�l not follow
ClientMat#er�To.: ZIS.Q02
Comrne�ts: Accompanying thi� transmiEtal is a letter to the Tawn Council.
PI.,EASE PHOTOCOPY TAIS LETTER FOR DISTRI�fUT�ON
AT THE TOWN COZ7NCII., MEETING TQIVIGHT, 5/7/9b.
Thank you. ' I
�ox�r�Err�rr�Lrav xc�TrcE
Thia facsimile cvver sheet and any dvcuments which may accontpany it contain information from
rhe law firm ofJACOB5 CHASE F[�iCK ICL�INKOPF&KELLEY LLC,(1)which is itstended for �
I,�,dFp�,,,dEHCe pl..zw, the us�e of the qadividu�l c�r entity to whtckr,it is addressed;and(2)which may coatain infosmation
that is privi�eg�d,canfdential,and/ru otf�nvise rxCmpt fivm di�tosure�dcti-npp9icablc law. If thc
1050 77� S`r, reader of this mc�a�e: is not thc intended recipient ar the emPlpyee �r agent r�spons��le fpr
Sv;� 1 spp delivariag the mesqage to the inteaded recipient,any disclosure,�.issem�natinn,disti-ibution,c�pying
DEAIVEQ� CA g�269 or other use of this cornrnunication or its substance is prohibi0ed. If you have received this
cammunication in errar,plcasc cal,l us callcct to ecrangt for the destruction of the comrnunica[ion �
303-b8S.48�00 or iGs rcturn to us at our exp�nse. Thank ypn.
E�uc 303.689-4$1�9 '
, MAY-0?-19% 13�22 �JCFKK � P.02re6
J aCObs awN 8. FR��k
892-4422
CNAS�
FRiC� � May 7, i996
KLEI N�Cdp�
& . �'ia F�csr�rrrr�,�v�rL
, ��I�� �'ovv�Cvuncil
�' Town of Vail
; 75 S. Frantage Rd. West
LLC Vail,CO
ArTOaneys ._ �.w �e: May 7 Ti�wrs Covncil Meeting Regarding r#ppeal of Desigre Rev�ew I
B��rd Decrsiorr—Lodge at T✓ail Internatianal W�ng
Dear Tov�m Council:
This firm c�urently represents Anita Salt�t�e owner o�Condaminium iJnit
527,Thc Lodge at Vail aparhnent cc�ndorniniums,on whose behalf this le#ter is being
submitted. Ar�ita Sa]tz and �er architect, Lyran FritaJen, wiil appear at the May 7
hearing and ma�e a presentation to you
The faliowing is a sum.maty of t�e points that wi11 be rais�d on behalf of
� A.�.ita Saltz at the hearin�:
� 1. Lod�e Prope�Eies, Inc. ("LPI") is trespassin�; vver Saltz' br�lcvrry.
Accordin�t�archit�t LyAZ�Fritzlen,the dmwings re#lect the construction of a new
concrete slab and joist floor af Sal�' balcony,thereby requiring that her balcony 1�e
removed and rebuiit. Saltz has not given LPI her permission to cc»mrnit this trespass.
Secause Sa1tL}�as nc�t given her approval for this tresp�ss,LPZ�ha.s iepresEnt�cd tbat
it does not need to obtaig Sa�t�' pem�.ission. LPI's contentions arc without merit As
discussed below.
I�ndfp�NdtNet P�un
�OSO ��TH Si. LPI contends that the pmposed Internahanal Wing vvhich is def,ined herein �
as includi.ng the conference eenter,the hotei units and ihe penthnuse sufte,alt;ho�ugh
S�RS 1500 penetrating Saltz' balcony and/c�r�exterior wall,does so within 8,204 feet above sea
DeNVtK,C� 80265 ievet. LPl contends that Sa11z' balcony and tloor of her entire condominiinn unit is
303-685-4800
k�x 303-685-4869
][}XK-S 534-1 .
MAY-07-1996 13�22 �JCFKK • p,03ig�
?own Council
May 7, 1996
Page 2
faur feat lower than it shvuld be and therefore LPI is pernutted to commit this trespass. This is
wrong for the fvllowing reasons:
a. If Saltz' balcony flaar was built four feet taa low,the floor af her entire unit
rivas built four feet too low a�well. it was LPI or its prcdecessors who surveyed the properky and
con.�tructed the bu�lding, Any mistake here is c�aaz�ed��inst LPI,not S�1tz.
b. Paragraph 3.1(c)(iv) of the cont�aminiuffi declaration {the "Declaration"�
specifically p.rvtcct,s S�t�in a situation such as this. That para�raph gives Sa1�tz an easement for an
encraachment upon aay p�rt of the Lod�e at Vail in circumstances just like this—where LPI has
buiit in the�wrong place ar the encroachment is due to s�ttling or shifting,ur 'for a�ny other reason,"
c. Saltz ovvns tl'�ose four feet that may have been buitt tao low t�hrpugh�dverse
pvssessiQr� (the condominiusxi has been ownea anr�occupied far over 20 years�.
d. It clearly was the intent of the parties at the time that th.e sauth win.g was
subm,itted to condorninium own,erstzip that the unit owner owned the s�ace within.his unit and his
balcony even though it may have mistakenly be�n built four fect lower ttpari it shoutd hav�tseen.
e. ParagrapYs 3.4 of the Decla�atian provides that the balcanies are a limii�d
cc�mmon element with exclusive use fiar the ur�it r�wner.s arsd access to th�se balconies is limited to
the unit owners and tkle invitees of the�anit owners. Saltz has the right ta prevent LPI from coming
on to her balcony to construct any part af ihe Int�raational Wing.
f. Faragraph 4,2 vfthe Declaratian gives the Baard of Ma.nag�rs a right af acces4
to each �artment unii and its appurtenant comman elements only as may be necessary for
"maintenance, repai,r or replacement vf commvn elements , . . or fvr the making of ernergency
rcpairs."
Just yester�y, LPI reprssented that it would not r�move and rebui�d I��Irs. Saltz' bal,cony.
That has not yet been confirn,ed hy LPI's and Mrs. Salti' archikects.
Mareover, irrespective of whether LPI remaves aud rebuilds the Saltz halcony, LPI wi.l�
con�mit a trespass si.mply by t3�e fact ihat construction debris wi21 blow onto the Saltz property. We
fail to see 1�4w that can be�voided frvm conszrucrion of a sv-ucture only six inehes a�vay from the
Saltz gcoperty.
�ua�c.ss�a.�
MAY-07-1996 13�23 �JCFKK • P.04i06
Town Cvuncif
May 7, 1996
Page 3
2. The Intema�riona] Wing wi11 be built to within srx inGhes af Saltz' unit. A nuisanc�
is that which abstructs the reasonable, comfortable and peaceful use and enjayment af one's
property. A.nythi.ns which materially lessens the enjoyment af property ot the physical cvmfort of
pecsons in their homes is a nuisancc. SS Am.Jw.2�d, § 1,Nuasance, It is�imply a ma.tter of comnaan
sense to understand tnat the��ltzes' enjoyment of the use of their tuut,which they have vwned since
1984, wi�l be lessened and interfered with by a structure that comes within six inches of the Saltz
condomininm uuit.
LPI's Internation�l�iJing,as cuarently designed, violates Saltz' privacy an.d property rights
and exceeds the Town's z.oning c�rdinances. Mrs. S�ltz has a cl�im for nuisance due to thi�invasion
of her privacy,#he extremely close praximity of the Int;�rs�ational Wi.ng and the naise and distvption
fror�r the elev�tQr shaft,vents and use of the hotel room an�penthouse decks. Anita Saltz bought
a fi�th floor co�dominiut�n. SHe did not buy a garden 1eve1 apa€tment t�iat comes within s�inches
oF an exteriar walf or tenace of an adjoining btulding.
3. LPI strxtes ti�at pursuant to the Decfaration, Saltz cannot objeci ta the Tntemational
Wing on the basis of the obstruction c�f her"easement for light and aiz�-" Hawevet, this da�s not
elim.inate the Saltzes' claim of nuisance ar trespass. Furihcrmore,if LPl �ttempts to hoTd Saltz to
what was stated ip the Declaration at the time she bought l�er unit,then recip�raca�ly, LPI shauld be
held to wh�t they represented to Saltz at the time she purchased her unit. Ai the tiine nfpurcha�e,
LPI r��r�s�.mted that(a)it was unlikely tha#the International Wing wauld ever be built;but(b) if the
ZaternatiQaat Wing is bui�t,it will be built as depicted in the mode]present�c�to the Saltz�s.
Notahly,the 1983 Ynte�rnaxional Wing model and plans, approv�ed�hy the riTail Planning and
Envirvrunentxl Commission("PEC'�in Qcto�er 1983 aze markedly different from the current plans
and drawings for the Intenuational Wing. In ]983,as well as in 1993,ths decks f�om the penthouse
suite w�ere planned to came helaw Saltz' balcony. Currently,the plaas call for the pent�ouse deck
to come six fe�t hi�,her than tl�e floor of Saitz' balcany and urut. In other words, purtivant to ihe
c�nrent plans,Anita Sa1tz wilL walk out onta�.er'balcony,aad withia six inches vf her face,is a wall
vv�th a planter in it,tre�trunks Etnd then people partying on the decks justt gast the trees and shruBs.
4. $y his letter dated January I7, 1.996, Torvn Plannera Andy Knudtsen, indicated his
cancerning regardi.ng some of these same pvints. In addition, Mr.Kn�dtsen wanted LPI to obtain
tl�e con$ent of fhe holders of the limited,cammon elements(5a1tz' with zespect ta her balcony) and
the ge�e�l ce�mmvn elements(the c�nd,ominium associ;3tipn) to ihe Int�r,national Wing proj�et. As
we understand it,neither ofthese conditians hav�been met.
JGF1cK-3}a4-I
. MAY-e7-1996 13�2� �JCFKK � P.0Si06
Tovvn.Cauncil
1V�ay 7, 19�6
Page 4
5. The rationale for the I'own's density and bulk ordinances is underscored by the
International Wing development. A parcel of land can take just so much developrnent. AIl of the
prd�lems the Tawn is currently facing with the International Wing have flvwed from LPT's
erroneous logic regarding zone loi and pa�cel of land. In 19$3, LPT vbtained the Town's �onsent,
in a written contrac�nat#o apply its density ardinance to blo�k the Intetnational Wing development
The Town's ag�eement was based c�n LPI's definitioa of"parceP'and determination af tha size of
the "zane lot" on which the lt�ternational Win� is to be built. LPI is wrong with respect to botFi
definiti�rns.
a. LPd started this entire proc�ess in Y 983 by defining the parcet of land as rr�l ,
including the sauth wing or nortEi wing candominiums—buildings bui.lt dirc�tly o�t�is parcel of I
laud. (LPI also excluded the Lad�e Tower,which is alsa built on tl�is parcel of land) LPI ba5ed its �
exclusion of the condominiums an �ie contention th�t they are built on a pazcel of air. Nv ane,
anywhere, except LFI,has ever defnec�parGel in this ma�u�er. Ind�t;d, "thc lcga] concept of l�nd
iacludes an indefinite ea�tent upwani,and includes everythiz�g t�trestrial,not otily the ground or soil,
but everything whieh is attached to the earth, whether nature, as treeS, herbage, and water, or a
product of human manufacture,As hotases and pther buildings. 1 Am. Jur.2d Adjoining Zandowner
§1,Vai. 58 g. 832.
b. LFI cca�tends that the south wing and north wing condominium units are not �
included in the density count because they are not built an the same "parcel" on which ihe
Inteinatianal VWing is to k�e built. If these condon�iniurn �uuls w�includet�,in the d�nsity caunt,
then the Lodge already exceeds thc applieable zo�ing for density, This excess densit�is anly further
exacerbated by t��Tntematianal Wing. �n addition,the drawings indicate that the In�ernational 'Wit�g
will conta�n many two-bedroom"suites,"thereby allawing LPI to coun�each af these suites as or�y
one hotel u�it for t�e density count when,in fact, they are equiva�er�t,with respect to ihe exp�ct�d
number vf hotel guests (and the impacts and burdens imposed by additiona�peaple),to that of two
hotel units.
c. In 1972,when Ll'I was trying to dbtain approval for c�nsiruciing the Lodge
South Tower, Ross Dav�s represeated to the Tawn and county authorities that t�e siz.e vf the
applicable z,�ne�vt was 3.Q4 acres,ih�by wntainigg sul�icieni land square foutage to 5uppc�rt the �
density of the�,odge Tower. Naw t�at LPI want,to build the Intera�atioilal W ing, it claims t��ax the
applicable a�ne lat is 2.089 acres because if it were required to include in its dexisity count the Lodge
Tpwer,the Ladge would exceed the allowable density many ames over. A�air�,in 1�391,LPI listeel,
as au asset,the full 3A4 ac�e parcel.
,CF'K1C-35Y1��
MAY-07-1996 13�2� � JC�KK � p ��0�
Town Cauncil
May 7, I996 ,
Page 5
Saltz respectfiilTy requests this Tawn Council to require LPI ta submit its proposal tQ the PEC
and begin the proee.ss i�a public arena--#he process to wluch alt other dcvelapments are subject�ed,
It was passibl� for S�lfz tQ chall�nge the PEC's prelir�unary agprovat in 1983 because she did aot
own the unit a#that ti�e.
�INe appreciate your tiu�e�nd Consideration.
v�Y �Y Yo�
JACOBS CHASE�RICK KLF.�IVK02'F
&��,L�Y LLC
r �
i �� ��_
/�
� Ann 8_Frick
I
1LtiKK-5534-I
TOTAL P.06
L�1
� � /�
il
►�
TOi�'N OF VAIL �
7S South Frontage Road Office of the Town Attorney
vaid, Golorado 81657
970-479-2107/'Fac 47�-479-2157
Apri125, 194b
VIA TELECOPIER & U.S. MAIL
Mrs. Anita Saltz
c/o Mr. ]ack Saltz
SELCO
46th Floor
767 Fifth Avenue
New Yark,NY 1 Q 153
Re: Appeal of Design Review Board Decision
Lod�e At Vail International Wir�g I
Dear Mrs. Saltz:
Your�ppeal of Design Review Board decision af scheduled to be heard by the Vail Town Council
at its evening meeting on 1VIay 7, 1996. The evening meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. �,
If you have a�y questions ple�.se feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
�
,r�l �'�j,�,,.n.-�� -
(
�t. Thomas Moorhead
Tawn Attorney
1ZTM/aw
xc: Andy Knudtsen
��RECYCLEDPAPER
i �
DISTRIBUTI�N LIST
Ann B. �'rick, Esquire Robert tiV. �✓1cLaurin
Lia A. Woodall, Esquire Town Manager
Jacobs, Chase, Frick, Kleinkopf& Kelley, L.L.C. Tawn of Vail
l OS0 17th Street, Suite 150�
�3enver, CO 80265 Pamela A. Brandmeyer
Assistant Town Manager
Jarnes S. Bailey, Tr., Esquire Town of Vail
Bailey, Harring & Petersoz�, P.C.
1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 3175 Susan Connelly
Denver, C4 80264 CammunEty Development Director
Town Qf Vail
P�r. Jim Lamont
Post O�fice Box 73
Red Cliff, CO 81649
Jim Brown, Esc�uire
Brown & Harmon
One Norwest Center
1700 Lincon Street, Suite 3000
Denver, CQ 80203
Ms. Lynn Fritzlen
Post Office �ox 57
Vail, CO 81658
Mr. Jack Zehren
141r. Gre� Cnstman
Zehren and Associates, Inc.
Post Office Box 1976
Avon, CO 81620
Rick R�sen;�,squire
l 120 Lincoln Street, Suite i I00
Denuer, Cl� 80203
d;,-,f.. J
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 70�; 4--24--96 ; 9:28AN1 �DUNNABPLANALp�}'�STN-+ 3034792157�# 2��
�
LAW OFFICElS
DU [V, ABPLANA�P & CHR�STE�ISEN� P.C.
A�IIOF►�IONAL CO�IOYT16N
.laMN w,oUNN TNC VAIL BANN BUILCIN� 7tl[riioNr:
A�THUR A,AaRLhkALP.J R. �u lT[300 co�oi.4�e-oaQ4
/1LLEN C.CHRI9TCN9C�u
GIANC L.M¢lIMAN IOD S4UT}I FRONTAOE ROwo WE9r T�LECdP1ER:
�9rY0)�F7a-47B8
R.C.iT[rM[ti30N UAII, 1�..'Q�,ORAOO QI@B7
KARCN M.DUNN �
VtCULLCOUMfLL' cc�rincq�.taK��qwr I
JE11R1'W. MANNAFt �
24 Ap�il 1996
Me . Ho11y McCutc eon
Town Clerk
Town of Vai.l
75 South Frontag Roed Wes�.
Va►il CO
VIA 'TEL�C�d�IER
Re: Appeal f Design Review Board Dec�.sir�n
Lo�ge t Vail Internntional Wing
Dear Ms. McCutCh on:
This Firm represented Ms. An�.ta Sa�tz, the owner of �
Condom�nium Unit 5�7, The Lodge et "(��1i1 Ap���ment Condominiu�ne, iri
aseo�i�ttian with the above matter. Appeal from the above action ;
wae filed on the lUth of �April. •
Ms. Saltz ae advi ed ua that s�a has received no notice
regardl.ng the da e whan a hearing in this ms,ttsr is to accur on her
appeal . Neither heve W� e�eived �ny auch notice. Please fnrward
auch notice to ur c11.�n (unlesa she directs y�u otherwise� , by
telecopier, if p asib�e, nd forward aJ.l future naticee direetl ta
her, at the foll wing ad resa and telecopier number:
Mra. Anita altz '
c/o Mr. Jac Saltz �
BELCQ
a6th Fl�oor -
767 F'ifth A enue
New York NY 10153
TELECOPIER fl. : 2Y2-6�4�2221 �
If you have any que�tian� rec�ardit�g thi� x�queat, or if yau
are un�ble t� CO ply wit� it, plea�e contact diateiy.
xy tru urs
DUNN, A�P NAL & CH BEN, .
�
�
Arthur A. Al�planet , Jr.
xc: Mrs. Anita 9 ltz
, �
� �
DESTGN REVIEW BQARD
APRIL 3, 199f�
MINUTES
ZTEM# 2 - 1NTERNATIONAL WING
Transcribed by Judy Rodriguez, April 16, 1996
2. ]nternational Wing-Appeal of thc Zoning Admir�istrator's decision to approvc a AK
buffcr to be built between a proposed addition and tbe existing condominiums.
174 E. tiore Creek Drivc/portions of Lots A, B, and C, Block SC, Vail Village lst Filing
Appellant: Ms. Anita Saltz
F'lanner: Andy Knudtsen
I`riike Arnctt- Item No. 2, International Wing, Appeal of thc Zoning Administratar's decision to
apgrove a buffer to be built betwecn a proposed addition and the existing
condorniniums.
1 assume we have a lot of folks here today for this particular itern. I would j ust
like to apprise you all of the format for this particular item hcre. We are going ta
start out with an overview from Mr. Moorhead, the Town Attorney, and then a
synopsis by Mr. Knudtsen here, khe Torhm Planner. We will then here frorn the
applicant and then we are going to have public input and let me forewarn you that
the public input will be limited ta 5 minutes per person, We�lon't have all day, 1
would alsa like to remind you on behalf of tt�e Board that this is ' a court of lavv.
We are}�ere to revicw designs�that's our primary function and t n lastly the DRB
willlaok at the actual issue of the staff approved buffer between he units there at
thc Ladge.
i/1 <:'�
Art Abplanalp- Excuse me Mr. Chairman..
Mike Arnctt- Mr. Abplanalp
Art Abplanalp- for the record,yes Arthr�u�Abplanalp, representing tl�e app�llant. Are we
considered a rnernber of the public and onl}� limited to 5 rninutes for our
presenta.tion? We are aftcr all the person wha is seeking the ap�eal.
Mike Arnett- Let me ask my legal side.
Torn Moonc�ad� That is within your purvicw to set the per�od of timc and if you consider
them.as public input, it is appropriate to limit them to 5 minutes. That's
wit�in your dis�retion to allow as much presentation as you feel is
appropriate.
Design Review Board
Transcription of Tape,Intemational Wing
f:leveryone\drblintwing.403 April 3, 1996 l
� � i �
Mike Arr�ett- Well A,rt's point is that he himseif represents thc applicant. Arn 1 right?
' Art Abplanalp- Thc appellant. Typically, vwe are the peoplc who would speak first ar�d
who would rnake ...statements.
' M�ke Arnett- Well, this is different.
Art Ab lanal - I understand that.
P P
? ' ,.,� Mr. Chauman, a housekceping rnatter; everything rrrust be spoken into
��5 �,,,t�s`�� microphones and people have to identify themselves for the record.
� �
Milce Arnett- Alright, and so as I said getting back to our for�nat, we are going to hear
from Toan Moorhead now, Town of Vail Attorney.
Tom, Moorhead- Thank you Mr. Ch�irman. On Novernber 1, 1995,the Design Review
Board approved the plans as submitted by the Lodge Properties, Inc. for
thc approval af the International Wing. That was appealed to the Town
Council and it wa�heard by the Town �ouncil on Decernber 5, 1995. At
that tirne, on motion by Peggy Osterfass, far approval of the design plan of
the International Wing as presented, with the provision that some
additional buffering be warked out v�ith regard to the terrace area .
Additional buffering, lan�iscaping, or whatever that would be, that the staff
could wark out with t�e applicant to imprave the visual impacts frarn the •
adjacent property. Staff was to decide by working with th�developer,on
w�at tl�at additional buffering wauld be. That motion was secondctl by
Kevin Foley and it was approved 6-1. Pcggy had stated that hcr intention ,
on the rnotion was just on the west side, to mitigate the impact on the
Lodge Candominiums. ',
Qn March 7, 199b, Andy Knudtsen with the staff consultation, approved
the submitted plans for the buffer to be constructed between the penthouse
on�he Internatianal Wing and the cxisfing condominium dwelling units.
That staff decisinn was appealed on behalf of Anita Sal�z by letter dated
March 3 4, 1996. It was stated in a letter from Mr. Abplanalp that the
reasons for appeal were:
1. Thc plan which was provided and identified as that receivi�g Town
of Vail approval was virtually unintelligible,but to the e�ent it is
intelligible, it clearly has no relationship to that which was approved
by the Town Councii. Thereforc, the applic�tion must be initiated
as a new process, rather than being subjectcd to wholesale redesign
at the discretaon of th�Community Development staff.
Design Review Bvard
Transcription of Tape,Inlemational Wing
f:�everyonc�drh�nhving.403 ApYtl 3, 1996 2
. � � �
2. The ncvv plaan has an area which is bctween candominium unit 527
and 533 on the west and the penthouse structure on the east, which
is not labe�ed,diagramed or the subject of any elev�tion and which
was not included an the prior plan and may be an clevator shaft and
it may have a sloping roof or�iat roof. It may be twa foo�t hig� or it
may be twelve foot high. I�]o information has provided which
gives any infornnation regarding these yucsti �an finally
3. The roof plan or the roof section identifies thc location of the outer
section. Onc can only speculate even as ta whether the Ladge
Apartment Condominium is on the left or the right of th�t section,
but it is clear that the latter does not represent a section indicating
the size or the impact of the structure, which apparently is pianned
adjacent to units 527 and 533.
I would also point out that this matter is subject of an aetion presenfly
pending in the Eaglc County District Court, of whach the person who has
appeal�d this staff decision, Anita Sa1tz, is a plaintiff in that actian.
Mike Arnett- Thank you Mr. Moorhead. Andy?
Andy Kr�udtsen- Thank you. Andy Knudtsen, I'm the staff planner on the presject. What I
thought� would tio initially is just bring everyone up to speed an the
context. This is the Lodge here. 'The existing condominiums, the propose�i
lnternatianal Wing, the bu.ffer, which the Council vated on in Dccember o#�
1995, is right in this area and fur�her shown on this baard right here. This
is the ane condition that the Cauncil put on the project and it is the only
issue whic�i we are focusing an today. What we have here is in sections,
the existing Lodge Condominiums at this po�nt, and terraces that stack up
ta a planter with ev�rgreens on this side and the Presidential Suite of the
I�temational Wing ovcr here. In pla�D,you can see that there are threc
raws af landscaping, separated by sandstonc ledges,the highest plantcr
arca is up against the Presidcntial Suite with the evergreens right in thc
center wberc the mass of the building is. We, uh, Zehren and Associates,
the architect, worked quite hard on this. Staff and Zehren sent back and
forth approximately four to five different design iterations and eaeh one
was an improvement over thc previous. Thi� last onc sufficiently addresses
the buffer, in staff's opinion.
��
� 1 would lik�e to add one ather point. We got this letter just a few rninutes
before the DRB convened earlier today, from tbe East Village
Homeowner's Association, and if 1 can pass it out to the Board, as well as
�he audience. The one point I'd like to put on t�ae rccard is that the
Design Revicw Board
Transcription of Tape,Intemational Wing
f:leveryone\d�\intwing.403 Apri13, 1996 �
, � � �
dimensions of the approved drawings have been very c1�ar,not anly were
they drawn to scale and the seale could be used to understand them,but
they arc also shawn on the record as to the layout both in hcight and length
of thc proposed planting materials.
� I have a qucstion, In Mr. Apblan...Art's lctter, were you referring ta the
plans that we approved, or are you refcrring to thc buffer arca; when you
are talking about the unintclligible plans.
Art Abplanalp- These arc not the plans that wcre approvcd, first of all.
? I agr�e with that. I'm just asking you what yau were rcferring to.
Art Abplanalp- I was rcferring to these that was actually Qn the table at the tablc at the
time.
? Ok
Andy Knudtsen- And just that I can clarify,the file has these drawings in them.
Art Abplanalp- Mr. Chairman, the approved plans did nat have the cicvation of that roof
whic�was one of the things that we were complaining about. Thc
approved plans,that we were provided has no elevation,has no indication
and that's an illustration of the whole problcm here, thcy were incomple€e.
Mike Arr�cft- Are you satisfed that you are seeing it now?
Art Abplanalp- 'That�articuLar.. We don°t know what it is. We'll get into that if we could.
Mike Arnett- When we do get to review these designs,we will cover that roc�f form.
Andy Knudtscn- If i ean just closc, Andy I�udtsen again. The decisions that are before the
Board today are citber to uphold the staff decision, overtum tbe s�aff
decision,or modify�he staff decision and that's all I have to say.
Mike Amett- Alright. At this tirne we'll hear from Jay a�e you representing the Lodge?
Jay Peterson- Yes, we're here and the manager af the Lodge is herc; Greg from 3ack
Zehren's officc is here; Tim's here frorn Jaek Zehren's office to answer any
questions. We have been over this a thousand times with the staff. You've
seen the fuli presentation af the full International Wing,obviously somc of
you haven't, but we'rc only here discus5ing a rnitigation (litigation?)of a
buffer area l�etween the International Wing Presidential Suite and the
Desigzi Revicw Board
Transcriptian of Tape,Inlemational Wing
f:�everyonc\dtb\intwing.403 April 3, 1996 `�
' � � �
Lodge Condominiums,the top floor condominium units. We think we
have addressed that. If thcre's ar�ything that is unclear, I don't sce it, but I
respond certainly to a�nything that Art has a questian an as far as any
heights, �nassing of anything,the type of vegetation, the height of thc
vegetation,bu1 I think the drawings are pretty clear. In Peggy's motion
whcn she made it, all shc wanted was do something to buffer it a little bit
mare and so we worked with the owners as much as we could, with the
owner of the�niddlc unit, ivhich is next to the Saltz's unit, we worked with
t�em,they did nat have a problem with it. Thcy are here representcd
today. So, truly just Mrs. Saltz that has a continuing question about it.
Wc will res�and to any of their concerns.
Mike Arnett- Alright. Yes,then we wi�l have public input at this timte. Art, if you'd like
to start.
Ar�Abplanalp- This may be two stages, Mr. Chairman, first 1 would request the Design
Review Board to do two things. First of all, cont�nue this hearing until a
tirr�e when we are able to have �n oppartunity to review the file. We've
been trying since the fourteenth of March to look at the file in this case and
we have nat been able to do that. First Andy has not...
Mike Arnctt- You have not been permitted to see it?
Art Abplanalp- Pardon me?
Mike Arnett- You have not been permitted to see it?
Art Abplanalp- Correct. That is absolutely correct. Andy vuas vcry coaperative and then
when this d�ecision was made, he referred me to Tam M�oorhead and Tom
indi�cated that we would be permitted to sce it. Finally, on the twenty
sccond of May,he provided copies of the materia�s.
Mikc Arnett- Twenty second of May?
Art Abplanalp- Twenty second of March, I stand cc�rrected, pardon rne. The twenty
second of March we told him we wanted to sec the�le,bccause we kncw
it was incomplete. Wc have other documents that were in the file carlier,
COpl�S, so we knew th�t things had been takcn frorn the file. We tried since
the twenty second of March to try to find this file. Tom said go tiown to
the District Court; everything's there. We didn't do that,because th�,t
wvasn't the inFormatian we had. The last item on this packet, which I givc
you, est�blishes that that was not the tru�h. The material which was scnt,
pardc�n me, which was in the fi1e is called the fourth supplemental
Design Reviaw Board
Transeription of Tape,Intemational Wing
f:leveryancldiblinlwing-403 Apri13, 1996 5
' � �
certification of the designated record.
Mike Amett- I,really,you just lost me therc.
Art Abplanalp- This is the cover sheet for the matcrial, which we were requesting to see.
Mike Amett- Ok.
Art Abplanalp- That material was not scnt to the Districi Court, until thc day before
yesterday. If we had gone dowri to the District Court, as he said, to look
at this material, it would have been a wild goose chase. He misrepresented
to us what was in the court file; we were denied the opportunity to scc
what was across the street from us; we prepared for the hearings as be5t we
can bascd upc.yn what we had scen,but it's an i�justicc. The Town of Vail
�avonders why people are movr'ng frorn the Towm of Vail; this is an ex�mple.
Yau can't, this is supposcd to be a fairly infortnal hearing. Andy and the
staff are great, as far as availability of materia�s.
Mike Arnett- I've got to agree with you.
Art Abplanalp- When we come across the street, it's a stone wall a�d this is an cxample.
�'or that reason, in vrder for any intel�igent review to be done on this, we
have to havc an opportunity to see the file, And so we ask far two things.
Fi�st o#'all a continuance, and secondly, a direction to the Towr� Attorr�ey
to turn the rnaterial, to penrnit us td look at the file. Additionally, we see
additio�al diagrams here. Wc understand that Jay has additional diagrarr�s
that we have not seen and it may be possible somc of these things can be
resolved. ',
Mike �lrnett- There are additianal diagrams that he has not �een?
Jay Peterson- Wc have different renditions of what we wcre proposing to do with
Mike Arnett- This is a staff approved?
Jay Peterson- This is a st�ff approval.
Mike Arnctt- This is the relevant document?
Jay Petersan- This is the relevant document.
T,�Iike Arnett- Art so cantinue, this is what we'�e dealing with today.
Design Review Board
Transcription of Tape,International Wing
f:�cveryonaldds\intwing.403 ApI7j 3, 1996 6
' � �
Andy Knudtsen- You're ta.lking about the first or second iteration?
Art Abplanalp- No, no 1'm talking about, for insta,nce, the drawin�s you sent to I�-.
Brown, the Condominium Association, which answered some of the
questions. There are drawings out there, Mr. Brown faxed that to tne, he
was k�n� enough to da that, and what�e does what Jay and he da is ...
them. But therc are questions related to these plans and the plans they
have these. T�e plans that the Dcpartrnent of Community Development
relied upan on incomplete and conflicting. As an exarnple,the clevations
of this project, which were approved, w�ere approved back in October,
before any of this happerred. The or�ly full elevations of the building, I
don't think that they wcre ever approved, thcy were subrnitted in March of
1995 according to the material that was provided to �ynn Fritzlen.
'7 1'm sorry, I havc to disagrec with you.
Art Abplanalp- Ok, we'rc not going, as an example, this staff approwal of tlus str�cture,
which goes bacl�to October, and we'll gct ic�ta that in a moment, is a hip
roof, five feet high. That is ihe last approv�al of that structure. So, limiting
it to thss now, the questian of whether there should be a cantinuancc, if you
choosc ndt to,thcn we'11 ga ahcad, but othcrwise,this is the first order of
business.
Mike Arnett- If 1 may adciress that,the first order of business,just 1�riefly. To be hancst
with you, sis,you're not the ones reviewing this applicatian, we are and we
personally do not need another week, or two weeks, ar whatevcr, to look
at this staff approval and decide upon it, We'vc not made up our rninds, let
rnc guarantee you that. We will be reviewing thx5 and wc do respect your
opinion, but that wauld be contrary to precedent for this Soard to set back
an application. We oftcntirnes especially items of tkis minimal complexity,
oftentimcs see them and either apprQVe or deny thern in a mecting. So this
is nothing, in no way uniQue for us.
Is there someone else from the public sector that would like to be heard
here.
Art Abplanalp- That was only a question, wc �obviously have more as far as the .. of this.
However you want to handlc it,but that's only the question of having a
continuance.
Mike Arnett- Does anyone have cornments along that line? Mr. Rosen would you.
Design Review Boa�d
Transcription of 7"ape,Intemakional Wing
f:Veveryoneldrb\intwing.403 April 3, 199( 7
• � �
Mr. Rosen- Mike, what I'd like to do. I represent the owners of Unit 533, I?r. and
Mrs. Cavanau�h, whieh is a unit right here in the middle. We have a
couple of coznrnents,but for sake af this discussion, I would like to just
make my comments after t��presentation rnadc by the appellant, if that's
possible.
Mike Arnctt- All right.
Mr. Rosen- If not, I mean I don't want to cause some problems hcre.
Mike Arri�tt- Ok, well I suppose we'll continue vvith publie input then, regarding
specific�lly t,he architecture of this buffer. This is all we're dealing with
tc�ay, is this buffer.
Art AbplacYalp- Well, if we're back to that. If we're off tlze question of a continuancc, then
we do have some additional presentation.
Mike Arnett- Go ahead. We'rc going to start his five minutes from�ight here.
Art Abplanalp- Thank you vcry rriuch. I'm�oing to do my vcry best to work my way
through this stack of exhibits, which illustrate a number of problems with I
the presentation and specifically the division between the two structures. 'I
�irst of all tet me say, that although this is in litigation, we're trying to put '
this an this. When we becarne involved in this, it was apparent that and of ,
thc last�iesig�the Town Design Review Baard l�ad, invobved an elevator �,
which penetratcd the limited common elements. That was denied�t the
Town hearing. It was recognized in the first set of drawin�;s that Andy
had, that January as a result of which this�levator structure has�hey have
had to move tha�, whic�has affected ewerything vertically bclow it. That
particular problem has created internal problems within the building. No
plan,pardon me, no approval should have been grantcd on thi�, becausc of
thc fact that the buffer on the upper story resulted in�rablems o�th.e floors
below. We have a�ist of various problerns and the retief that we have
reqt�ested. Yau can ta�Ce them undcr advise�r►e�t, check them off, do what
you wouTd like with them as wc go alvng. But, thcy give an indication of
thc problems with the program as it stands now. Because of the limited
tir�e, �'rn�oin� to try to zip through thesc cxhibits, as best 1 can.
The �rst exhibit is the staff approval back on the first of Navember. This is
in the final. It does cross-rcference a letter to Jay dated 11/1/95. Actually,
the letter follvws. I think Andy wiil agree wit�that it was actually
Novernber the seventh. None of thase provisions relate to buffering to
protection of anyane, alt�ough they are all Iegitirriate concerns. It is
Design Review Board
Transcription of Tape,international Wing
f:�everyone\d��ntwing.403 Apri� 3, 1996 8
• . �
interesting to note, that for whatevcr rcason this particular project is
getting off for what is apparently the eighty three parking fee rate, w�ich is
�bout half of what it is now, for a Tawn which is in dire financial straits.
Jay Peterson- 1 object. This has nothing to do with the Design Review Board and what
we arc here for.
Mike Arnett- You know Jay, �ou'we got a point there. We are here to review this
design, sir. I dodt really carc about the parking rate. It's not our purview
to decide parking rates hcre. All we want to know, all we want to revi�w
here, and all I want your input on i s wha�do you think of this particular
buffer. T'hat's it. Confine your cornments to this particular situation, if you
wauld.
Art Abplanalp- � will do rriy best. Exl�ibit two is the last cross-scetion which was approved
by the Town of Vail and that is in conflict wit.� what you have before you,
but therc's nothing to supersede it. It says that the roof, and I'm speaking
af this now, Exhibit 2.1, thc roof of this structwe is five feet above t�e
terrace wall. Therc is nothing in the Town's �lc to supersede that,
including this clevation of? which does not appear on the approved copies
you'll see, as we go through hcrc. Now,there's been some questions to
whet�er that's a hip roof. 1�c approved plans on the ncxt two pages
establish that it's a hip rocaf and it is not a flat roof as indicated in January
a�d I still can't tell whether that's flat or not.
? T�at would be a gablc roof.
Art Abplanalp- That's what I read it, but I c�on't scc a gable roof on here. It ddesn't
indicate t�at because of coursc this was again not on the plan approved by
the Town. Ail of this is new. Now, the next page also establishes
Mike ,Arnett- When are these plans dated hcrc?
Jay Peterson- First of all, Pd like tv say that 1 think this rs thc plan that he is referring to.
T�is is not our drawing.
Mike Arnett- That's a cross-seGtian that wc never saw. That's an intcriar drawing that
the DRB never lookcd cven looked at. We don't do insides, we do
outsides.
Art Abplanalp- It's the only thing that was provic�ed to our architect as a drawing
illustrating the diagram of this. Now, again, if you can't see the file, you
don't what the Town's working with.
Design Rcviaw�oard
Transcription of Tape,international Wing
1':�everyoneld��ntwing.403 Apri� 3, 1996 g
• � �
Andy Knudtsen- Art, it might help just to point something out here. The�idge af th�roof
above the elevator shaft is running on an east west axis, which the section
is an cast west section, so this ridge that you sec here is the top of thc roof.
You can also tell that this ridge is at the same height as the sandstane
led�;es separating the planters and also the sarne height as the railing ofthe
condaminium owners.
Art Abplanalp- Ok, if you look over at Exhibit 26
Mike Arnett- What time you got there?
? 7 and thirty seconds
Art Ab�lanalp- If you look at E�ibit 26, you wzll see the plan that was approved by the
Town.
Iv�ikc Arnctt- 36?
Art Abplanalp- 2b. That is the cross-section and as you will note, there is nothing on this
having anything to do with that roof.
Mike Arnett- I can't find 26.
Gcorgc Ruther- Mr. Chauman, it's been time.
Mike Arnett- 26, Why dan't you just show me yours. Has anybady found it yet. Going
a little slaw when it comes to page flipping. What was your concern about
page 26.
Art Abplanalp- It's nc�t the same drawing. 1'hat is the staff approved drawing. That is
what we are appealing from. It has nothing to do about the roof here.
Mike Arnett- Andy, could yau respond to that7 Is this the staff approved drawing.
Andy Knudtsen- Yes, it is.
Mike Arnett- V►�'hy do you think it is so drastically different from that? This is a cross-
scetion that clearly shows k.he same fe�tures displayed in that drawing there
sir.
Art Abplanalp- That crass-section is here,not at thc roo£ This has been added to the
drawing
Design Review�aard
Transcription of Tape,internatianal Wing
fleveryoneWrblinlwing.403 April3, lg9�i ia
- � �
1Vlike Arnett- What's your paint?
Art Abplanalp- The point is that tlais doesn't put any li�nit on the roof. Ne�ther does the
other half of the approval which is
Mikc Arnett- If I'm not mistaken that roof is thc same as that roc�f.
Art Abplanalp- No, you're pointing to the rniddle of the two terraces. Accarding to this
Andy Knudtsen- Art, if I could just interject here, It's clear that the roof of the elevator,the
' terraces, cvcrything is below the hcight of the rai�ings of the balcon� with
the exception of vegetation which wil� obviously grow up above the height
of the planters. If your point ia a cancern about blocking the views ar
something like that,maybe you could talk about the concerns of your
applicants, or your clients in rc�ation ta using the buffer.
Art Abplanalp- That's what I'rn trying to do. Well, as you will sce, this again is t�e
approved drawing. They are saying that this limits the height. That height
is not on the city approved drawings. They are not the same dacumcnts.
Mike Arnett- You are not quitc typical, sir, to say that the height of the ridge will not
exceed the heigl�t of the railing. We use thase sorts of conditions on a bi-
weekly basis.
Art Alaplanalp- Bnt it doesn't say that. It daesr�'t say that anywhcre.
Mike Arnctt- �t explains it�ere. It displays it here.
Art Abplanalp- When yau say the first here, that's what they are rendering you to today,
that is nat the appraved drar�ving.
Mi1ce Arnett- What is not the approved drawing.
Art Abplanalp- Wl�,at you have been presentcd to�vday
Mike Arnett- Yes it is
Art Abplanalp- It isn't, I beg your pardon. The dravving that you ar�e being show�►today
has been rnodified by the arldition of the roaf feature, by the addition of
�ang�aage which was nat on the city approwed drawing. It's a matter of
what record you havc to come back on.
Design Review Board
Transcriptian of"1'ape,intemational Wing
f:'�everyone\d�\intwing.403 April 3, 1996 l' �
- � �
Mike Arnctt- l regret to inform you that your time is up. �Creg would you like to
respond to that plcase.
Greg Cristrnar�- This part here shaws the roof beyond. He's right,the section is cut
through here and we're looking this way. I}ust put this roof on here for
clarificatian,but it's heya�d and it's showing that it's level with these
ledges. Samc vaith t�ese elevation nurnbers. Thcy are vn there just for
clarification. Andy knew all the elevations at t�e tinne when he approved it.
Andy ICnudtsen- That's �orrect. In conversations with Gre� we c�eveloped the various
alternatives; each o�e improving aver the last one. �t was clear that the
elevator roof wou�d not be exceedsng the height o#'the railing,
Mikc Arnett- Alright, Rick, Mr. Ros�n would you like ta cc�rnment on the architecture,
please.
Rick Rosen- Jus�for the record, my name is Rick Rosen. I represent Dr, and Mrs.
C�.vanaugh, who are the awners of Unit 533 and as the Bvard can see, 533
is the middle of the condonainium units. I really just want to ga on record
and explain�hat the Cavanaughs have not bccome involved in the
cantraversy, quitc frankly beca�se we understood that there was going to
be a building built there at some point. They resounded to that fact and
what we did was we decidcd to work with the architects and the owners of
the International Wing to come up with some s�lutians that might help
mitigate the impact that was going to happen with t�at. We have worked
with thcm very closely. The�have answered our questions,provided us a
nurnber of taken care of a couplc of concems that we had. 1 think those
concerns also were sent in a�etter to Andy when this whole revicw pracess
was going on of which were included hcre in this particular design. We
have no objection with t4�is design. We're actually qui�.e happy with what
thcy've done. 1�hey've listencd to our sug�estions; listened to our
complaints; have w4rkcd with us. We've got a couple of minar things that
the owners arc working with right now and we would just like to go on
record thanking them for their support and helping us.
Mike Arnctt- Thank you Riek. Could you point out again who you represent.
Rick Rosen- `JVe arc Unit 533, which is right he�c.
Mike Arnett- The on�dead center.
Design Review Board
Transcriptson of Ta�e,International Wing
f:�everynne\drb\intwing.403 April 3, 1996 12
� � �
Rick Rosen- Right Smack in thE middle. And just real quick for clanf cation,I had a
qucstion and I think Jay would g;et up and say the samc thing. We had a
question an the height of that particular elevator shaft. 3ay cieared it up by
tal�ing me through the plans, as well as Gx�eg Cristman and it was quite
clear to us it was definitely beluw the railing. 'I�ank you.
Mi�e Arnett- Thank you rnuch for your input. Is there anyone clsc from the public tha�
would like to comment. Mr. Brown?
Jim Brown- Thanlc you Mr. Chai�-rnan.
Mike Arnett- Identify yourself.
Jim Brown- Yes,my name is Jirn Brawn. I'm a lavvye�-and I represent t�e Lcjdge
Apartment Condornir�ium Assaciation. My client is the awner of the
general and li.mited common elements that are established according ta thc
declaration. The limited common elements specifically include the decks
adjacent to Units 533 and 527 owncd by Rick's and Art's clients
respectively. We were conc�rned that the earlier design, proposed by Jay's
client, impinged on those limited common elerncnts and in part, 1 believe,
this drawing was addressed ta that concem and I believe it is clear now
4hat these destgns, the design before the Board today daes not impinge on
the limited common elements, in partieular the decks of 533 and Un.it 527.
The second concem that we had was that the applicant's desigz�not
impin�e on the general comman elements, specifically beams, girdcrs,
�upports of the building. And there was some concern that that might be
the case. 1 rcccived today frdm Jay, late this morning,just before 1 had to
lcave to come up here, a fax which speaks to that issue. And interestingly
enaugh, according to the condominium declaration here,the condominiurn
regime, if you will,begins a�a specific elevation. That eleva�tiun is
8,204.89' above sea level. So everything that is above that elevation is part
of the condominium regirne; everything that is below that elevation is not
part of that regirne. Jay showed rne�oday a diagram that was attached to
the decks that I did not have a copy of, which established that the floor
level of these condominiurns is at 8,2D4.89'. Is that correct, Jay?
Jay Peterson- That's correct.
Jim Brown- Anci as a result of that, it appcars that the support beams below the decks
are not part of the condominium regime and therefore, do not appear to be
part of the cornrnon elements, which my client owns, Now I want to stress
i'm saying appear�to be the case, as I mentioned, wc just got that
information taday, and we're getting that inforrnation to our architect ta
Design Review��ard
Transcription of Tape,lntemational Wing
f:kvcryone�drbuntwing.403 April 3, 199Fi �3
. ! �
revievv,but at this point in tirne, we do not havc an objection to this design.
It appears the intrusion on the decl�s themselves has been resolved and it
appears tt�at the concern for gcncra� cornmon elements has been resolved
also. T�ank you.
Mike Arnett- Thank you for yaYU-comments. Anyo�c else? Lynn Fritzlen. Will you pull
your rr�icrophone down.
Lynn Fritzlen- I'm Lynn Frit�len. I'm an architect and Mrs. Saltz addressed a couple of
�uestions to me in regards to the plans.
Mike Arnett- Are these included in her letter of March 14th?
Lynn Fritzlen- No, there is na correspondence for mc in that.
Mike Az-�ett- Oh, this is for Art. I'rn sorry. Co ahead.
Lynn Fritzlen- In that package, she was under the impression that her deck was a timited
camrnon element that required perrnission for acc�ss. A�d i said as a
practical matter, I cauld not understand how they could leavc the deck in
place and construct a roof deck structure undcrneath it. And so far, she or
Art has nat received�any information that does address that. C guess the
interpretation at this point is that the it is owned by the association, Jim, is
that corrc�t,or hovv does that wark?
Jim Brown- Lynn,the information I got ftom Jay late this morning,I faxed irnrnediately
to Art and that did include the cross-sections and the supports that Mrs.
Saltz had been looking for. And thc infarmation that I got fi-om Jay
indicates that the deck itself is right at R,204.$9' whieh is where thc
condorr�inium regime begins �nd goes up. It does not appear that the
supports to thc decks are part of the condopniniurn regime and Jay nated in
his lEtter ta rne, which 1 provided to Art,that Lodgc Properties has �.duty
of support to the condom4niurn regime. So although the condominium
regime begins X feet up in the air over the�round, it's Lodge Properties
obligation ta sup�ort the condominium regime and Jay noted in his memo
ta me that there was na speci�c requirement in how thcy do it and no
specific requirement that they seek the assaciation's consent before they
change those support element.
Mike Arnett- Excuse me, if I may interject here, �owhere under Itern No. 2 dfl fi see the
condominium regime or the supports far this deck. What we're here to c�a
today as a D�sign Review Board, is focus on this particular issue, which is
the buffer bet�ree�those units and this unit and I'd likc to get back to that.
Design Revicw Board
Transcription of Tape,Intemational Wing
F.�everyoneldtts\intwing.403 April 3, 1996 14
. � i �
Lynn Fritzl�n- I'm sorry it was such a lengthy answer, it was just a ma�ter of
uriderstanding and I just wanted to cla�ify it since Mr. Brown. T gucss t�e
other thing that Mrs. Saltz askcd me specifically about is the loeatic�n of
any meehanical equipment and the height of the elevator, which in the
section there �s the shaft indicated at two different hcights, 2'6" and 3'6".
Typically, the clearance above an elevator docs not vary in height and for
this type of elevatar it wou3d requirc about 12'3" in cicarance, so that
would bring the raof of thc cicvator up to a rnini�num af 3'6" above thc
deek and that is not entirely consistent with v�vhat is shown. Although we
do not have a section through the e3evator so those were her cancerns.
The dthcr thing that she c}uestianed was it appears that there are some
ducting from the kitchen that is coming up from the kitchen to thc roof and
being vented ta the side. And she said that the ducting and thc equiprnent
is not addressed on these drawic�gs, You know this has been continuing ,
concern with DRB;t�ese plans get through the Board and then we end up
with a roof that's full of rr�cchanical equipment.
Mike Arnett- I bcg to differ. We eover
Lynn Fritzlen- I'nn just stating her concerns,that's a�l.
Mike Arnet- `Nc cover that when it originally went through thc DRB. That's one thing
we always try to pay closc attcn�ion to on downtown prajects in particular
is roof top m�chanical. And we've been through the rooftop mcehani�a�
and we'vc already approved the roofto�mechanical where it exists. And I
think what yau see is what yau get�ere. And rest assc�red if w� rnake a
motion in favor of this, we will modify it to stipulate that the height of this
elevator shaft, the ridgc peak, not exceed 42" or 3'6" off the terracc, so that
it be no highcr than the guard rail height.
Jay Peterson- Michael, Greg's here to verify this, there is no mechanical o�the roof. '
Mike A,rnett- I'm aware of that. We've been through that. That's always one of our big
conce�-ns and it's been addxessed. Anyone else from the public? How
could I �orget.
Jim Lamont- East Village Homeowner's Association. �ecause this is an appeal to a
public hcaring, is there any prohibitiQn against tbe public speaking on this?
Mike Arnett- No, five rninutes.
Design Revicw Boazd
Transcriptian of Tape,Intcrnational Wing
f:�sveryone\drfi\intwing.403 Ap�ril 3, 199l� �5
. �
Jirn Larnont- Ok, five minutes. I would yield whatever additional tirne i may havc after
my comments to Art. Thc Homeowner's Associatian is spccified in the
w�ting 1 think. Our questions are what you see �s what you get and to
make surc that those are clearly defined,so that all parties have an
cxpectation is met. You shouid note that we are under subpocna by the
plai�tiffs in the litigation. I represent a neighborhood association that [
t�ave been dirccted by the Board to attend all mcetings and to make
cnmrnents in terms of clarification with regard to this matter. So our letter
is written in the spirit of rnaking sure that we have sufficient? sa that �11
parties can know what their expectations are. As far as the aesthetics of
this rnatter, that's ]cft ta you all and I would hopc that you wou�d make
your best efforts to meet the needs of all parties. Thank you.
Mikc Arnett- Thank you, Jun. Have wc left anyone out?
Art Abplanalp- Could I briefly res�ond to your suggestion of conditions?
Mike Ar��tt- Certainly, let rne get my pen rcady,
Art Abplanalp- Wcll, ac�ually I was simpty going to refer the Board to tbe one page that I
provided earlier.
Mike Arnett- Which onc was that?
Art Abpl�nalp- Whieh was the list of possiblc conditions for
Mike Arnett- Is t�is on the l4th letter?
Art Abplanalp- No, it was handed out to you witl7 my packet. Many of those can be
�andled as conditions modifying the stafFs action. Sinc�e wc havcn't bcen
privy to see the file, we dan't know what's therc or whethcr any af these
conditinns are in fact satisfied internally. If the Board is in a�'eement, and
I thit�k if you look at Andy's first letter back in December, he certainly was
in agreement that some of these were, in fac�, cancerns. He requestcd
elevations, with this one exception, they were not ineluded in the plan.
Maz�y vf these are logically included in the conditions which m`tght be
placed on the staff approval ar�d can be handled that way. But since we
haven't scen anything, we just don't know. And 1 wvuld just suggest that
the Board take a look at thvs�one by ane and see whether these would be
logical for your�nclusion.
Desi�n Review Board
Transcription of Tape,International Wing
f:�everyoeeld�\intwing.403 April 3, Y996 16'
- • �
Mike Arnett- I"rn daing so naw anci for example, Penthouse away from apartment
condorninium units. It is away fram the apartment condominium units.
Uecrease the height of the penthouse level of the roof and the pitch. Now
th�se are itcros that have already been approved. We are nat here today to
discuss these iterns.
Art Abplanalp- �Vell, !'ll not argue with you and I give one by one. The first six items
related to change in design. 7-12 realiy related to incomplete items. So,
such things as getting the elevations. Thc last clevation that we were
prowided is an elevation w�ich is abau#three stages back. We don't know
what the Town is relying on, but if the Town is going to go out in tcxt is
this built in conformity with it's design review approval,the Town
respectively needs to know what the design revicw approval cou�d be.
Mike Ari�ett- Those would be the tirawings dated on what, Decembe�sotr�ethir�g of`95.
Jay Peterson- Or is he talkin�about these plans.
Mike ,"�rnett- I'm not sure.
Art Abplanalp- Well, certainly these would be among therr� Jay, but�he last elevations that
were provided to L.ynn were Ntarch, I believe, 1995 and as an exarnple,
they contemplate a stair structure.
Mike Arnett- But sir, 1'rn sQrry, 1 must reiterate and �'m not trying to be rude, we're just
burnped into review dcsigns here and this is a design we're here to review
today. That's it. Fini�o. We're not here to lc�ok. over the previous
approval. We're here to look over this particular staff approval. This is
wh�t has been appealed. Tnis is what has bcen brought back to the DRB
for us ta loak at and for heaven's saJce, I'd sure like tv get to looking at it.
Art Abplanalp- Mr. Chairman, if you will look at the plans which were submitted pursuant
to Andy's request on the Sth of January this ycar, in response to the
Tawn's direction,thcy inctudcd elevations of both ends of the unit. They
werc bcautifully done. The architect did a great job, Another set was
submitted in mid February. We haven't been permitted to see thosc. There
were six plans and naw tbere are two.
Mike Arnett- I don't understand this. Is this sornething�a do witt�t�e legal stuff that's
going on.
Tvm Moorhead- [f I could say something.
Mike Arnett� Please, to clarify it.
Dcsign Rcvicw Board
�'ranscription of Tape,Intemational Wing
f:l�weryone\drb\intwing.403 April 3� 199fi I�
• � •
Tom Moorhead- Art bel�eves that if he writes in a lettcr enough and if he says it enough, that
it becomes fact, that he has not had an opportunity to revicw this file. 7That
is absolutely untrue.
Mike Arnett- Thank you.
Tom Moorh�ead- He has reviewed this fiie. This file has been cerkified with the District
Court.
Art Abplanalp- Two days ago.
Tom MoorhEad� He looked at it last weck. He l�as been providcd copies. He had asked for
�copics at that tirne. �Ie was provided copies. He asked to laok at the file
again. He was told tbat the �le was in use, which it was, because we
certifying additianal matters to thc Bistrict Court. He�elieves that he has
some identity other than his client. His client has bcer� served this. Andy
Knudtsen has appeared and testified at a deposition for five hours. He
produced thc entire record at that deposition. Andy Knudtsen was
subpocnaed by Mrs. Saltz to the hearing. He produced the entirc rccard at
that hearing at�d for Art Abplanalp to say he has not had an crpportunity io
review this filc is absalutely untrue. He chooscs ta rnake issues that don't
exist and I take �ssue with that position and that is�ot a fact, because his
ciient has had continued aecess to this file. Mr. Abplanalp chcroscs to
continue to harass and overburden t�ne staff with mcaningless requests ovcr
and ovcr again. Thank you.
Art Abplanalp- Mr. Chairrnan, this is the typc of elevation which Andy requcsted in
Deccmbcr; which Jay provided in January and which we agreed this is
app�opriate and it hasn't been done to this.
Mikc Arnctt- i�vir. Abplanalp, i would havc to say that perhaps this sort of nc�toric wil�be
useful in your caurt case. But, once again, we're herc ta look at this
design and at this paint 1 think we're going to go on with what's on the
agenda here, vvhich is the appeal of thc Zoning Administrator's decision to
approve a buffer to be built bctween a propflsed addition and the existing
condominiums. That's it. ThaYs what our job is today. I appreciate your
opinion and I do have your iterns here and we are going to address those. I
think thc ones that are relevant, however, not the ones ta pertain to a
prcviousty granted approval. Alright,now if we could once more and
briefly have a brief presentation that describes the quantities and spccics of
the buffer by whoever is most gualified to give said. Thank you.
Design Review Board
Transcription of Ta�e,lntemational Win�
F.�everyoneWtfi\inhving.403 April 3, 1996 �g
� �
7ay Peterson- As far as species, we've got ground cover here,juniper here,this is spirea
bushes h�r�and over here, additional gound cover here and these are
pinion pines here, seven o�them, a minimum af six feet in height.
Milce Arne�t- Ok, and describe the,this surface is sandstonc.
Jay Petersan- This is a sandstoae ledge.
Mike Arnett- The surfacc of the roof is.
Jay Peterson- Uh, copper.
Mike Amett- Trcated copper?
Jay Peterson- Yes.
Mike Arnett- Muriatic acid?
Jay Pcterson- Yes
1V(ike Arnet#- Ok, gentlemen,comments regarding this particular application and I don't
knaw if you've all had a chance to look over this,the ftrst item on 1Vir.
Abplanalp's list was regarding thc rclocation of the elevator away frorn the
apartrnent candominiums, I'�l start by asking if that is a possibility of
relocating that any closer tv this,
Jay Peterson- P,�o, we have moved it out of their limitcd carnnr►on elements and so we've
r�ovcci it 2 �/2 feet from where it was to take it further away, but w�had
ta rearrange everything down in our'building to do that. We cannot rnovc
it anymore. it's obviously �function of the intErior design of the building
and this is nat possiblc to move it anymore. But we have kept it as low as
possible, which is below their railing,
Ivti�ke Arnett- And in all cases,you do avoid the cornmon elernents.
Jay Peterson- Yes sir.
Mike Arnett- Between these two buildings. Ted, do you want to start.
Ted Hingst- First, I'd like to say it's wonderful to see so much interest i� these projects.
Personally, I feel this is an enormous imprc�vement for positive growth. I
think, considering what alternatives might be out there, this is a definite
p1us. The ground cover, what were you praposing. In terrns of the ground
cover that you were proposing to put in,what type plants are you planning
Design Revicw+Board
Trans�ription of Tape,Intcmational Wing
F:�everyone\dtfi�ntwing.403 Ap171 3, 1496 19
-. - ! �
on using.
� It's c�etailed an there.
Mike �lrnett- lt's kind of hard to read from this side.
� ?? and junipers.
� Soport, it's like 6" tali
Ted Hin�st- Ok, so what we're seeing is then a stair set of green.
? Yes, they vary from 6" to 18" and t�en the trecs are going to be b"to 8'tall.
? The ground cover will start to �'ow over on top of the ledges witlx a
cascading cffcct.
Mike Arnett- Any other comments.
Ted Hingst- Not from me.
Mike Arnett- Gene?
Gene �Js�elton- Well, it appears to rne that the view fram S2? and 533 is going tv be
substantially impraved over what we have right now. I like the barrier.
Mike Arnett- Alrigbt, Clark.
Clark Brittain- t think that this whole discussion,wc shQUld probably just get back to this
buffcr thing and I �hink there's a lat of fvresi�ht and planning exhibited
here. I think they have gone to a lot of trauble. l think that the dccision
should be upheld.
Mike Arnett- Brent?
Srent Alm- I have a questivn about the sandstone. Is there any concern about sc�mconc
wanting to get out there a�d walk on thc sandstone? Is it a safety issue?
? Na, it'll bc 2" thick at�d mortar set, so �f sornebody does walk, it wan't be
able to support the load.
Br�nt Altr�- But, would somebody be able to walk out there`?
Design Review Board
Transcription of Tape,international Wing
f:lcveryone\d�t+'vntwing.403 ApCil 3, 1996 20
- • �
`� Yeah, people w�uld be able to walk on it just in terms af maintenance.
Mike Arnett- Therc was initially a concern for the benefit of the other mernbers that this
would become a party area far the pen#house located on this floor and I
think this basically, garden concept addresses that concern quite well and
that it more ur less,precludes the eventuality o�there being a part�in this
area betwccn the existing units and the proposed premicr suite.
Jay Peterson- And there i�an irrigation systenn up�here, so the only time anybody has to
go out there far maintenance, for wecding and thin�s li9ce that.
1Vlike Arnett- Mr. Rosen do you have �,quick comment?
Rick Rosen- Just a quick qucstion oa�the nnaintenanc�, since it's be�n brought up. Let
rne just have the applicant just give us a quick comment how tt�a�'s going
to be maintained, as far as the vveeding and that typc of thing.
Mike Arnett- Certainly, who's in charge vf the landscaping here?
Jay Peterson- John can probably address it bcing the same type of what we do all over
fhe Lodge. We have maintenance people on site. Obviously, it doesn't
have to bc sprinkled by hand. The type of ground cov�r and the type of �
plantings that we have, it's certainly a minirnal type of a rr�aintcnar�ce
syste�n. Whatever ncccssaxy to keep them nice,we obviously do. You can
tell by thc grounds at the Lodge.
Mike Arnctt- Does that answer your question?
l7ick Rosen- 1 just have one other quick question. As in most projects, is there going to
be a bond as far as replacement of the debt landscapit�g,that lype of thing
during the period of the first ycar.
Mike Arnett- Wc gcncrally don't ask for a bond, we generally put it as a condition of
approval that if any species die,they bc replaced, as per the original
approval.
? �t's to our advantage to keep tha# in gaod shape. With a premier suite on
the other side, they will be loaking at parts of it as well.
Brent A1m- I would just add that I think the buffer as proposed daes provide good
screening, but still s�ems to allow views from thase adjacent units. It's
unfortunate that they have this little problem, a building bcing built right
outside their existing units,but it seems to be the way it is.
Design Review Board
Transcription of'Tapc,Inlemational Wing
f:`ev�rycrone\drblintwing.403 April 3, 1996 21
� i
Art Abplanalp- For clarification, since the Board is going to approvc perhaps the
conditions,there is addition�l information on the two maps that have bccn
presented today. I would simply request, and that's part of our problerre,
that it wasn't on what Andy had available, I would ask that any motivn
refer to these two plats, rather than what Andy had, which did not have all
of t�is information on it.
Mike Arnett- Let's date tl�ose plats.
Art Abplanalp- Thase are actually da�ed the same date as the other, �ut the difficulty is that
they can change.
M�ke Arnett- Well, let's date t�em and initial them today, Andy.
Art Abplanalp- Thank you.
Jay Peterson- I disagree with Art's perception of�hese.
Mikc Arnett- I agree w�th you Jay. I preYty much sec that as the same drawing I saw
displayed earlier,but it's harmless. My questions are the clevation I do�'t
see o�the elevator rpof would be the west elevation. The part that if you
loak down betwcen t�e balcQny rail of Mr. Roscn's clients, the
Cavanaughs, if yau look directly dcrwn, standing at the rail, vvhat do yau
se�. Do we have anything therc, or do you plan to tnake that grow into the
railing.
? Yes, there will be a sandstane wall.
Mike Arnett- Qk, great. I)ocs the Board feel that the quantities of landscaping as
displaycd are sufficient? Anyone not feel that they are sufficient. And the
railing details are as we initially approved,right, as per the original
approval, the handrail details, the gu�rdr�il details?
? That's correct.
Mikc Arnett, 4 think this has gane a long ways towards satisfying the concerns af the
neighborhQOd. I would echo Brent's comment that it's unfortunate when
Yarge buildings are develaped that do impact people's views,views that
people have beeome accustomcd to, but�n as much as this is not in a
designated view conidor,I think that it has been the case in the past, and
will continue to be so, that noone's right to a persc►nal view is guaranteed.
I think that these people have �one out of th�ir vvay to do a nice project
Design Review Board
Transcription of Tape,Intemational Wing
f:�everyone�drb\ietwing.403 April 3, 19�J6 22
. � �
here. I'm surc the landscaping, for their benefit, as wc�l as the owners of
this unit and the ones adjacent,will be suf�icient and well IInaintained. 'T'hat
1 l�ope you wauld know that if far same reason these quantities as listed do
not app�ar sufficient,they will be upped, as I'r� sure they will be. j have
nothing to add. I think it was a fine job. I think staff had every right to
staff approve this. I understand why it came back,but at this p�int i think
we're ready for a motion.
Brent Alm- Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a rnotion to uphold the Zoning
Adrninistratar's decision to approve a buffer to be built between a
proposed addition and the exis�ing condominiums at the lnEemational Wing
with the following conditian:
That the height of the elevator roof not exceed the heigh�of the
railing or 3'6".
Milce Arnett- Wc have a�notion. Dc� we have a second?
Gene Uselton- Se�ond.
Mike .Arnett- Second by Cer�e. All in favar. It is unanimous. Thank you.
Art Ahplanalp- Referenee to this refereneed set of plans.
Mike Arnett- And also would you add t�at,
Brent Alm- And that the plans that we're looking at are datcd 4/3/96. That's it.
Mike Arnett- Gene, would yau amend your second.
Gene Uselton- Second.
Mike Amett- All in favor.
2. International Wing- Appeal af the Zoning Administrator's decision to apprave a AK
buffer to be built between a proposed addition and thc cxisting condominiums.
17� E. Gorc Creek Drive/gortions of Lots A, B, and C, B1ock SC, Vail Villagc 1 st Filing
Appcllant: Ms. Anita Saltz
MOTYON: Alm SECOND: Uselton VOT�: 5-0
TJPHELD - with the clarification that the elevator shaft not eactend above the height of the
deck railing.
Dcsign Revicw Board
Transcriptian of Tape,intemational Wing
f:leveryone\drb'Unhving.403 April 3, 1996 2'3
' � ' � � FIL�D IN THE
C�OMB�NE.D CLERK'S OFFiCE
DI9TAICT COURT, �AGLE C�UNTY, CO�,ORApO
c�se Ho. �s cv �6z (Caneoiidated w�.th 9s cv �77 � '��R � � ��g�
- _ �---. '°'���(2J1AI lY�1��1.L2i39D 0
ORD�R DENYING Pft�S,XMINARX IN.Tf7�CTiQN �Y
ANITA SALT� ,
�zain�i.f�,
ve .
LODG� PR�PERTIE� , �NC. ; T�utN p� VAILr e municipal, cor�nratibn;
T`C1WL� COUNC�L 0�' THE TOWN OF VRILF anc� E08 ARMQUR, SY9Z�L NA'VAS,
PAi��, I�. ,70H:vSTON, MARGARET A. �ST�R�0�9, �C�VIN R . FOLEI�, M�CHp►FL
n. ,7�w�a� and ROa FORD, aa th� Town Cou�tcil oF the �r,wt, of Va%1,
Defer�dertts,
and
vUANN� WELL9,
Plaintif� ,
ve ,
LdQGE PFtbFE:tTI�5, wNC, , anc� TH� TpwH OF VAxT,, CC>yQ�DO� and it8
aqente, in their of�icia� cap8cit.iee, namely, �HFi �'av1N COUNCr�,,
Tn'nIN MANAGER, TOWN A'I"'I'�7RN'$�Y', �'LANNIx^iC At�D ENVIRDNi�S�AtZ'}�L
COA'1MISSI�ON, D�SI�iY R��IEW �pARD, ANi}Y KNUDT3EN, in , }�is ��ficial
c�;pacity ae Sen�,az° Planner �nd zoning Adminfetrntvr, and DAN
S�ANL"CK, in his vfFfcial capnc�.ty c� ��� BUILDZNG ADMINIS'TRATOR.
Defer�danta .
Tx�s CAs� cvncarns Ghe prc�poeed �xpansion �f tr�e
International Wing of the Lodc�e at Vail (her��.n�after "t�,e
Lddg�" ) , which is own�� by Lvdqe Propertx�o, Znc� (nerein�fte�
"LPI " ) . Tha Lodge i■ �.itt�ated on 2.089 ecr�9 wi�hin the
Comrnerci.al Core 1 �oniriq di8�x�.c� ( "CC1" ) , This zo�e wa�
eetablished by t;�e To�rn r,f Vail in 1973 . Tk�e Tawn �$ter advpted
a deneity regulation fot CCI in 1980, �Thi�h Iimita conerructiori
tr� 25 dwelling units ax 9�J hvtel raom� per acre .
8 ��kld ALE8BZE0L6 OI sZSnv] pautqa�o� ai6e3 �W02L3 Sb� 6� k36-�[ -�dkl
. • • �
Fl�zntiff we11� �o �he awn�r of e candominium at On� Vail
P��C�, lacst�d adjac�nt tn the eite upon ��iCh LPr p=v�vsee ta
bu.�ld �he_ Int�r. n��innei Wing. Pl�intiff 5altz i� . the ownsr aF
�Qr.domini�m �n�t 527/52g o£ the Lodqs Ap�rtment Con��minium,
located on *h� �ifth flo�r ahove the Lodge . Fleinti�fs seek AuYe
106 relie� ar.d e prelirninar� injunc��en �rohibiting, the i��uence
of � buildin� p�rmit Lo LPI an the q-ound thnt th� :Ir.tern$tiana�
Wing exc��ds the allowable dendity ia CC1 ; that the 1963
Ag��ement betk�een th� Town and LPI can�titutie� illegal contract
zoninq and �� vo'd and unenf�rceable; and th�t the 1993 Pl�nning
�hd �nvirvnmenta� �ommieeian ( "P�C" y epprovnl h�� 1�peed �nd i�
n�� void.
Plainti�f we11e aleo deeka decleratory judc�m�nt tha� the
1483 Agreement is vo�d crd unenforceable and � declara�ory
judgrnent that the Tbwn vlolnted Wells ' pracedural and subg�ar.tiva
du� prace�� righto by entering �nto the 1983 Agreement .
P�ei�ti�� wells a1sQ eaks �he� the Cour� man�ate trat the Taw�
zoning procedu�ea prvc�sses be adhered tio ar.d applied t� the
Inte�natianal �ing, th� aarne as they are applied ta ail otiher
propoged develvpr�enta .
Ths ma�ter �s no� befvr� �hio C�ur� svlely end only #or the
purpoee of ruling on the preliminnry injuriction . xhe Co�r� h��
received a cer�if�ed recozd fr�m the mown concerning' the h���inge
he�d before tl:e Flannfng and Environmsntal Cc�mmisaion ( "p��° y ,
th� �e�ign Review Soc�rd ( "�RS" ) dnd the Tvwn Council . � The
��xtified record cvn'�n�r1� z�umerau9 eupplernenta rt�c�ue�ted 1ay �h�
variau� paxt�es . �7u�ti pridr t4 t�e he�ringf the Court receivad,
2
E d�'.�kfd �L69E�L�Oa'.8 '{]7 s�anv] Patttq¢to� ��fS2rZ '4cQ2[d 9b' BO 9B-B1 �2ldtf
1 � �
irdm both P1r�ir�t��,ffs and D�fer.dan��, a lengthy memc�r�n�tum
canccrni.ng Ghe�r reepec�ive pps�tione ansi arqumente for or
egain�t �h� prel�.minary injunction .
At t'�e h�8ring, the Cvurr, waa pr��ented w�.th very Timited
'�estimony and literaliy hundred� of page� s�£ dQ�ument� and
cozreapond�n�� which tha Cottrt w�# to c�neider, The Caurt al�cs
h�dr� arg�am�n�s at cvutt�el whic�,, ta d larg� extent, were a '
9ummary of their written memor8ndurn�
A bz•i�� recit�ti�n of the pXa�a�a requir.ed ta nl�tai.n a
building pe�mit in the Tvwn a� Vail i� 0esentia],. A pexsvn
de�ix�.ng to �bts�n a building perr�at make� application fvr PE�
apnrav�l . This applica�ion is presented t� tf�� Commu�.�ty
nevelapm�nt ��part�mo:�c etaf� :or �heix revicw, nncl �hey ��ork wi:h
��is etaf� to make tf:e applicatio�i acc��table to at��f . When th�
ett�f� a.a satisfied t�:at the application ie �CCeptable, they
preeent it tt� tk�e �lann?ng ar.d �nvironment�l Cvrnrn�.saion . Th�
hed.rinqs before t:�e PLC are public hedringo , e�hd ad�oining
p.roperty nwr��r� are r�otified. A,riy peraon d��iring to challenge
'�he ciecisiot� a� the PEC cQ7 do so� by eQpael to the � Town Council
withi n t�n ( 10 ) daya a� the P�;C decieion. Lixewias, r_t�e T�awn
Cauncil me�cingg �re pLblic, +dnd nat�ce of �the pending
�p�slicatioa� woulrl �ppear on �h� Town' s eqenda,
Fa�lo�.�ing the p�C apprcave�l , �he applicenti nnugt then ep�ly
for L+esign tteview �tvard e�pproir$1 . Th� p�oce�a i.� si,milar �a p�G�
in that thQ applicant tt�en ��vrks with the p�anning staf�, . e�nd
when th� �taff xs satief�ed that thv t�pplication ia r�edy to !ae
pr9sented to the Board bt a public h�arang, with prior notx�e t�
3
b 3`.�lfd 9L"�9BcE0G6 ° � I m'l.tno� pau(rymcs� 7j6r73 ';+IC]233 Sb � .�'i0 86-�j �hdH
� � �
adjaining p�op�r*_y �wnera . Onca dgnin, any pereon wi,�hinq �o
r.h�lleilg9 th� decig;.on Qf the DR� cdn do eo by eppedl� ta the Town
CQUnci.l. within tei� � 101 day�; and once �ppxoved by t?�e Town
Council, a buiJ�.d,ing permi.'� can b� ibs�ed, mh� DRB doee not hav�
authdrity to overruld dacisi�n4 0� �he pEC, anr] they �ra e�p�r•ate
anr� distinct �Cte which must take pla.ca, with 6Cp,srdte dn�.
dA�t.inct bvdrda, both ha�vi�q dppeal, fro:n �h�i.� de��.�inr�g �o the
Town C4ur��i1 . �oning �nd denaity �r� ig�u�s be�are the F�C but
r.ot be�4x.� tt�a pRB . Appraval by the PEC �.s s Prereq�uieito to a
n�8 app�.�.ca►tion, �nd et��� dA�e not pre��ont an mppZ3�atfon to Ch�
1�FtH until it i� �etiaf:�ed the apglicant ha� ��C ap�irovgl .
AcGord�,nq],y, the DR� dve� not heve nutharity to xecone�ider th8t
whi�h he� been epprovac� �y the PaG.
The Town coneader� the Car,�missione and th� Bodrde �cs be
se�ara�e and di�r.inct entitie� errc� edmin�i�tra�tiue agencie+a ; and
�h�ir d��i�ians , when approved by the Towa Couneil, ar� f1nal .
The on.1y appeal therefr�T would ba to the Di��rict Cau�t,
purauant to A�le x06, which muat be taken with�n 30 days .
Under th� fxlCtb of ehf s c�.�e, no ane rs�pealad ;,re PEC' s �.9t33
ap�roval o� tk�e LPI ' 8 Ap�1�CdCiGtl tint�l th� filing Of �.h�,g Cdpe
in Uecember of 1995 . All parties concec�e that the ��aintiffa '
nppeel of the URS d�e�lsio�tr which was �laeliz�d cn �ccember 5 ,
19�5r wam tirnely m�d�. The P1.Airi'�1f��3 Cor.t�r.d �.ht�t until auch
time �� the adpl.i,cs�icrn receivQd �pprav�l trom t3�� bR�, th�r� w�,e
nathing to appenl . The D��cndents " pra�.t�¢� f� �}��C the P�C � and
the DRB are entirely �eparate grocesaea and thst the PEC ag�rvvA1
i� e atatu�ary prcr.cquieite ta a DR8 �ppli��'��.on .
4
� 3'Jtfd E3�E5F3Zh;dL6 ' UI �'7��'4J 1�euFq�q� �C��3 °L]0213 Sb� 60 F36�9I -2idH
_ ..y
� � � !
� IT I5 'TH�:R�FbRE the Ordtr af �,hia Court that pl,aintiffe '
Motian for Preliminary Inj•�nction is denied and thet' the Tawn may
iasue �: bui.lding permit to thc Def�ndeht LPI at su�h ��ma ee it
is adm�.r.istrative�y ready to dv so. The Court cautione tha� LPz
procted� an thet build�.ng permit a� it� awn peril� �vY��ect t� the
ul�imnte outcvme o� t2ti� case .
The Court cicniee t?�e pre�imir�ary fn juactiar� fox Ch�
following �'ea�on� :
1 . The Court doe� nat f�.nd that the Plaintiffs wil� �uffer
irr�parabLe inju�y and that �here ia r�o smergenc� �involved in the
�ituaC�.csn t�ecaue� Plaint.iff wollg hag known of th� p�C agpreval
aince 1983; 8nd �ven ii� she claime �h� did not r�cs�ive pro��r
notiice v� the PEC approval hearingg, �he c�rtainly t�md A ful.�
umderetaading oC the ei�uat_or� af�er rac�ipt by her now dec��aed
hue�band af the 1983 Agz�ement in June of 1964 . Aciditia:te2ly,
Plaintitf 9a.ltz i� �eherged with knawledgr of ��e A�greem�nt �nd
i�, b�y covenant , preCludecz from chal�.enqi�g Che develooment,
2 . dr,e of the Plein�iff6 ' cla�rn� ia �or monetary �amages;
and Cher�fnz�, th.e+y have an adequa�,d r�medy at 7.�w.
3 . The Court is not se�iefied th�t there SB a r�a�on�bly
�stronc� probabili*y Qf su�ce�e on th� meri�n i.n Plaintlffa '
cornplaint, becau6c at l�ast Plaintiff �aells had �c�ll . knowle�ge of
�,hA p�ac$edinqs e:nce 1983 but did nat �ppeel the P�� appro�;a1 on
a timely b��is Gr rseek a dec�.eratory judc�men� af the Tawrt ' g
actione when th� Tawn Board, intarpreting ita awri vrdinnnce4 ,
d��ided tnat �pI ' � applic�tivn did not exceerl thQ zc�nin� and
dene�ity� regul�tiona fC�� Zvne Ccl .
5
9 �JKei �3ZE96ZF.OL6 ' a I s-�.xnoJ pauc qaro� 7 i$g3 'W02i3 9b' 68 96-9I -23d'o'
' ' � •
� . The Court determa,nes that qranting a : �reliminary
injunction at th�Q tim� wi11 di�serv� �ha publxc i.ntereet by
�ncauz�ging persons to w�it prolar�g�d per�ad� of tim� before
sepking redreea of aYleg�d quaei.-juriedi.c�ivnai abu�ea, wh�.cb is
r�ne ot the pz�imary policy reaeon� behind reqtai��.ng apP�ale,
pu�euant �o l�u1e 106 (a) (4 ) , to be Pi1ed with�.n thi.r�y � 30� day� .
I� �h.is r�gazd, �ha Cour� adapt� the wo�d� of the Tenth Circui.t
Court a� A�apeals in Th�itr.h�r � ter= �►, ar_��. o �n ��,�, �,p,�
' F .2d 1472 ( 10�h Cir. 1990 ) , a� �allo�r� :
whether the reaenn is c�llgd lachea ,
e�tap�el, wa�.ver, or pubZic policy,
�hall�ng�� �4 the proc�dtuxal Snvel�dity a� a
zoni.nc� or�dirz�z�ce dnd canstitutiandl
challenges based th�reran muet be brvught
within a reaeonab�� t3.ma from enactment of
th� or�inarace . If not br�ughti in a tYrn�iy
manner, the pLai.nti�f will be barrsd it°om
challer.qinq the zonznq ordinance.
5 . Tre Pla�ntiff9 ' clairn thc�t L�r ' s p�C �ppro�re�� hae
3.ep�ed i� without mer�it. �'h� `�own haa, f4r mdny yra$x, and in
���cral other canee preaen�ed tn th.�e Cvurt, taker the �oeition
� �haC n�w arcinanc�s pas�ed whiie aa applicativn is p�ndi.�g do not
epply t.a t�� �ending applicati�ot� . Tt ie truC that• md6t towr_s and
citie9 da not adopt th?e poli.cy, buL �ea �.onq ae i� i9 uniforYnly
ngp]aed, �t doe6 nat v1 olr�te a.ny etatutd� nr conetitutional
Qrovisivn� .
fi . �'inal�.yf the Couxt dPtermines �h�t the be�8nce of
ec�u.i�ie� do not favvz the in junction under the #a,cts and
circum�tanceB a� this case.
6
� 3''.]'tfd 9�E89ZF0G5 'OI :�.,cno� rsurq�+o� 5I9v3 [�iQ2f.� 9b' E� 9B-9[ -Z!d'a�
, � � �
DONE A�n STGN�D in Chambere th�.e l�th dey vf Ap�'ilr L946 .
BY THE G4UF�mt
DI9TRI T JC1DG�
7 � �
B 3�k1d E3�E5eZ£cdLG • a7 e�ano� Paut9aia� ai8�a �W0213 9b� �im 96-8[-2idtf
I
� �
� � ��1
� � !� �'Y
�„ .: �, ,
��
TOj�VN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Rond Departrnent of Community Developrnent
Yail, Colorado 81 f57
9?0-479-2138/479-2139
FAX 97D-4?9-2452
April S, 1996
Mr. Ja Peterson
Y
��leststar Bank Building
108 S. Frontage Road '►�est
Vail, Colorado S 1657
Rc: Thc Lodgc Intemational Win�
Dear Jay:
On April 3, 1946,the Town of Vail �esign Review Board (DRB)considered upon appeal the staff
a�proval of March 7, 149b. ?he DRB voted 5-0 to uphold the staff agproval. Please call me a 479-
2440 if you would likc to discuss this issue in any greater detail.
Sincerely,
,
An y Kn d cn
Senior P� ner ,
cc: Bob McLaurin
Tom Moorhead
St�can C:onnelly
Patn Brandemcyee
Jim Lamont
Jim Broun
Lynn Pn�len
Greg Cristman
Jaek Zxhren
Art Alplanalp
Ann Frick
Michael Arriett
Rick Roscn
F:evaryone4�ndyr46_leae�'�pecerson.404
�•RECYCLEDF'APER
M
[�sign Review Action ���, n
TOWN OF VAIL
Gategory Number � � Date ��'_�•;�� ��� � �
I'roject Nart�e: - - � � "�C { - ,� �,
Building Name:
Project Description:
, x:, f
� --- 1 f
Qwner, Address and Phone: � �`' . +. ,- �__-l� � < ! � ��'
Architect/Contact, Acfdress and Phone: -� � r_ �� �' � 1 `� 5 � ' �_
c=�-�- � � �
�.egaT Descriptinn: Lot Block Subdivision Zone District
�
Project Street Address__ _ � _ _ � � ,!C ,r' ! : , v�� ,
Camments; I
I
�I
i
I
Board / Staff Action �'
Motion by: Vote:
Seconded by:
p Approval.
❑ Disapproval
❑ Staff Approval
Condi#ions
r , .:
� � � � � t• , �
.
. f.;
Town Planner
Date: �� DFtB Fe� Pre-paiti -
r,��. �'.�;-�. . ..-_ .,_ -�-1,r
� �, � ., t�..*.. �<^.,�� �., •
,� . :� ,�. � �,• + .� ;��.
j � ~Z� � �? � s � .�_ ti �,
�i� _�r�i� +,f4, ���.� ,�'" ��•• �-�,�b�ir - ,'�� `' rt: J`�
� `*� !
I i ,!� ' "�' �` � '� ,� ��� .. . 1
;�.� r ;�; . �� ,� � ;
�. ��'�:,� ,,.�� � ; .•��:�� � ��,,: .`'' `� i
------ �` • ��y a�,i �i,',�:� '1 �: � " :,°' '� �4 �':rs .'�
'� ',�. �� a r� , ,I
1� .71. . .. I /
.
�.' y ,__
! e.���'Q�� �Y� �1_ _ � � � /
� ; �i �.i� � � .� ����"'� ;� �
� � i ` ' �"�' . �' a
�� ;��� �.� 4 ',�-�t '
1 �I � � .:� �� ��� � .�..�: '��'�►� �� �
` � �
• � '`_ ' _ ° ' � ` . �i �
i.� .R. �I�.c ,: � �
` - — •� �� •�,, �`R `� �_.x�.ai.
� ` �! ��._ ` , �4 .,,�, � �r � .�; �.
i �,' .. ,r -� ,� ' ;,�. :Ati' � --s = �
x.
'�► . 1 � ��i t''l, � `9 � �� ��y - a�.�; �'3 _
r , �
, _
' � �;,��,,�''..`�� :'�� �, �, _ �
\ ' r ' �. � �; �/�e°'t �-':
� ' � `�'+! $ � � ��: { �'"yfy'^�,
_ ��'`''�,�. ���� �� �
� ;_; : � � _� � �� r �
.�.x;: �� _
� - - - - -�- \ - - t �
1 ' �, - `��.� : - �•� .,�,� � -w�. _
� 3,.�... � •� .,�„�.,� ,,1,� � �
� .�� � .1 ,,,.• ��r
- �, � �,
-�. , �� .:.�
� 1 �,►.r, �`,�
� ,Is���v�` r,, �'" , �f'
� �� r► � •�� �'!��' f
� .'�f `�j '�at,. ,�:. ��� ,i�� t �
.• '+�{ '�� •�� �' � �T <� sk �
r�-: �°`' .�. ti` `;.,�f �;, �- � �� = � /
I , '' � '
�. _ �� • � � � --- — � �
�� — -- ;f E„ ,.�i ti'� :� � ,� �``� � � r,� -�.. �•.
, ...__ ,
-�,,�r�� te :.::"'� �` -�. _`ti°�`�
- � - - - - -' �'I: .` l\��., - •,� �� ���. � i�
1
�• , �
�
.,� ,�: � `.,�.
��
. � .
w ��,' ��`�
,• 'f_ ,l� .±�' "+�I�.d�a,�.,a•:'� f/
� J A ,�g �
. .�3i sF.�r�r. .: }� vy,�r'�c'�'��.*, ^�v'f'� !""�.�,*► 'i'�}.". .t`l�e*�`*"--"'.�" ..',aa....''�:
, � �i��:�°�,:eit�l����tl` �r��;"��1�'�b"�`�.f'�y7, '�/ ��� .� \
i
1 �.'� ` � Jw: ,+�.�"� �'3'a�ia.ii :G�. ~�� 1 � ,
"1 �+ �tAt � ".��'��"��,�^G7s•d:�'i���i''G'�' 44'' • ��(��'7+ �
. �, �, �..
���"'';;�� `�"< t �`nr^�"r�� fvn �P�;�''�f����',i �� .�v
"�;'1�' p ..t �.�oA ..��,�;�,• �*. �
lr �"+ra� �"ir��l:•1■ f�"7���af����`�i�7 ��, . If{rfr �� t=;� ��- 1
'��''�a�,�I,'�t�i��-�'.,s4 °Ay,y�`� ���.. �i � / �p.� �
.� �'M i�.`'� °��r, Yc.^#,°� r��,,� �/�,,y �' \
� �.A�v� s t>�� _
, S.i 5��i �Y `��� � '�� �'� ll � �
�' L '�'� i'.��: ..;. �� � ..;�I�' ��11' '�
� - _ '_ � 1 � �,�T 1
� .
>. ' ` � .�� �. ' ��E. ..i�•� '1
� �e "
� � . T , . : � . �'�L ;. �
,
' � �, ; _ .� . �,,,r„�;;; ,,�:�,�'"� �
, � � � � �I �1�i�,.�� r: � �,� , l f ��� � �
� � r�
1 � � ' ''�� , ,' ��������'�
` II .� �� � 1 t.
� .� ' � � ,.
.. i .� _ �,--+;�� � �. v
E �'�' � "'�''''4
�� �, - :.,� � ..�
` , �;� �- �--- ,��.� �����;
� . � �1 � ,� � �, �
,, � , � � �=.:�, :� ����� :-.�*� �I
�
r .�� � `�. ,� ,, +
► ,-_� ..;r�' ti�. �
� '1 ! ...": r `\ � ��1 .�% �, � ��''":'`� ., \
i ..r 1 r � J
,y �k -- - - — �.t�e ..-I' � �- ' -� ..� �
�! �; �.���. ;ti} r ,t�' �� ,, �
, �' --- --J p _ '��.. � '� /� , d ��t ,� 1
1 + �� � ��, 4 � � .i
:. �1 ,�y �j►� � `'� , �(
1 ` t ,'�• t f 1 . . ���R7�'' �
� '` � _:�:��:��\,.- `�. �, � � '���'�, � 1 41 .
a + � ':� �4, =A,��• �� � �\1#I/r�+ f
_ �
..
, .
•..�, i •� .'1 �+� '= v- --- •i� � "'��'� f
.
I-_- - -- - - :-
1� � ^ � s 'r3� ��
°� � ��" �� F;� � ���}. !��� �
: � " � � ��-.� d�.
�� �� ��
# �r� ~a, �'u� �I k ��," il��. / � '
'� �"+ 1 .a.� '� 1��#1 ��ti���;r�����' . ;_��
� ��� i�. , � � ��Ml� �� ,
I� ' _ •'; � : ��• � ' !i � � �,,a ' : � �, 1
�'� ;�,. ,..' :!, ��� '' � �/ ' �,'� �� �
i ��:�1,�. ,:r �`` a�, __� � � + �/ qfi. .
_ ; '�� ' _' �,'�; '`..+� ; •':���\��R: �: �A�� , , {
l�� � � �' t � �_ � `
i � • 1
_ �+' �. 1, ��,�t�t� ' f •1 '
� � � E �, � �
�� . � � �� �. � .•fl... ! , ' i
� Y '�
1 : ''/h `� � y ` ,+4\� / �+� �, 'f 1 1 1 ,
� �P,r. � ' � '� r r.�` � .'�ti}�'
�� � . � �y' ► .� f��\ ��� • ��' �
, ¢ �,+ � A . � �( �M�� � '.. ' , ,
d �` 1
, �..�� —,��: -- -,-- - ,,.Pt���,' ,'�j.�_ — a �.�.•, f _,,,�.� � � , �
' , ���f�� �,W , •�,� � _I� ••` :� y�t-y5 .,` �, ' �
�� j,v 'Y-- }
I , 1 . �'� ' �,1 ��� � ^ . ` , � � 1
, �i 1' � /� • � ,
' , .�. .�, :t�5 I �•t �� •�,
q f �. � . s .
� � � � "• � -
r \ . ,> ;. , f � ., � ��� �
i t� �,.` � � � ,
+ ' '` F � :l�+¢�! 1��y- � � `�
, � - -� -- �* +��,.. ::,: k - ar�. .'?,;!� --- �,,�� �; ,-.a 'V ` � _
.� ' —I� •� �, ''�"' �;;� �
._ � ' ,c ' �����`.'�r� 1�: � .
� �, — --- + j�; ; i�4� ��,l��; -�* � � � �,�iw�i,�',�P'• � �
� ��1 � � � - , '. � •�"` '°'+} �` `�, �_:.-, ���� , 1
�
+
� t � � ` � '� �� �� � �` " ��� .
� .:e � t'
� ` �• �.�; � ':�_���� '�+ `' �- --- �,�� '` 1 �
_ ., ----; ��;.- -- �� ,�, _����- — - „�e �. �; ,
� ,... ,, . � , ,
_-,.. � � . � . , ., , .. �
,.� � ���� s �.: . , �
•�, . , ,. .�r.� � .,
_ - �_ '�.� �s�� .��/ � ,, �� =i , 1 .� `
` �� � ',' ,� ,,. F '� �.,�� , , ; •
I •:� � L.t ,�M Myyy ` � , 1
y. .I t `�, �.. 1 �,
- tr-- _ �-'1 '��R`� _ *:,t �' �' � 1 � , �� ,� •
,` ���0 `. � ..� J� . ,� � ��r�� �/ �
, �,�. ��,`� �,�!� < . #, � �� .� I ., � !
�,,: �:� : , .;;'j� ,,�,��- ai '� � ,� , ,�
,���� _' -�1�� f JI. ,,
�� : � , .: •� .� i � ��
` �, ''�; ,,r�,��r � �y.���. ��� � ��t� ` ,.`� �! 1 � ; '� �
� �V'.,} � . I
a i �' . . .- '. ""' ' `* ; % . � F �
.
+a •�"` .'" ' �'� _ -- - ,j, ��� • .�
i♦ �.. __ _�����Y , '.� _ _ ` . 'F�� `���
•I I I` � ` �
� � t � �; � �{� .��
..s .9..
�
� .*�r� �;`v- _ .�.- ��_ " ��
. :�� � 1� !- . • �
ir .�; ��3 �. �'���'� J� �`• • • • i
II��;�
.ys�tr . • • • • � �
�`�"r�,�`i'�,'� �ti, =�1�l1� �
a;i►� �, �,.,�.. ;�,:��.. +� IL— �- . • • • • •
„�sr' �.�►�: ,� F; �' `�v � �l � • • • • • i
' � �•.:� �i.�i.,4•. �� :r ,�'; �" ���• r a � � • •
��'! `' �►,°a:� a�: ` .�'!! -±i� r =�;; � • • • • • �
�. ..� �� � � ,����. ,�,��i� ��` • =11�ll.:11�• • a � • • �
"����r��. ^ � �i �'�'A'�'#"'�.������ #. i��= =��� a • • � • • � �
't{r �i`' y� �+ . _ 1 4• • • • • • a
m �'`r
.� �p► � "';� ' .—-",.�i�� � ! • • • • • • �
� � A , 11�"" '� 'r � ~ � 1�• • • • • �
�!_ �
� •.:`�����. :,r���` '�r'+�� ���• `� ' 11�+ • • • � • • 1
' �� ��"�..`.A�'��' y��,,�a* .,,,. 1,�` . —�e. . . . . . ,
,r-;+i, t ��• � � • • • • • • . ! 1
. ' 'F�� ��y" ' \'�:��?,� '�� I)�� � • • • • • '
, 1 i�'••� '•;`�lt��„ ,., � ; �►•1D �� � . . . . . �, ,
,� � ' �\, \� . �` .�:- � � e ��• • • • • •
� �
'�� a.�,�,# : '�c • • � • • 1
� ��. ;�,,x� � i. � , ll��L�'ll�� �
��,�r 1�:. . J : � 11�.11� `• • • • • • � 1
'� 1�, `
Il�L.II�� • • • � •
.�. �#., � r ���, 1��rt�� E� '�'l�• ����,,C���t• • • • • • !
,��e, eu '� l�lr�.:�c .�'.:�i�i� �t.... ''�.� „'���J��` • • r • • • 1
,_� ` t—�� � r df,�+� —.—. _ ��L 11� • • • � • • •
�.�,�, =�rY��a�= .�i�I�� � '.� 'i"'�' .� :..�� JI�.I�. II; • • . • � �
�' " �1Y � � ��`� • • • • � •
(l.�y�� ` � w�s .
l�' �- � � a a � `��� .; �� �..`„ ��U.'���'�1 • • • • • �
;� i � , ��• - ��, l C . ►• � • • �
i� '� � � i� • • • • �
, .
.
` : / �•� � �.�.� � � � ��.
y�*
' �� ^� : \�
v �+-
� � Y � �'��^-�t."":�sr�++���:�8
� �� � 'F. -
� � ,� _
� � � , t
� � � � � ' � = � 1
,� � 1 � �� 1 �� �
1 � � ' ,
� ° i '
_ ...'�,��
�,���..; . _._ .
`-- ..._.�_ : � :
��i�.i����u";-.".".
� ����u—�i�i.F—���'. .'�
.=��a�� �
1 � �''��u��•�• , �
'' ' � i��i�.�. . . �� � �
� � ''�' ,_ ��.u_�i��C . . .
� �,
i a � t u��i�;�:.�+ �_ �
� ,, ' ��� ��.�gi�u�. . �
, � . . ..'�, u�ir�.� . � �1
, � � � � � ��uu� u!'
.� �
1 1 � �� -..,�- ---.�' �
► - ;
1 �� �'� � .� ' ,�
, � ,.. . � .�� � �
''�'1( ,
. " �,4
.� ���,����� . �
., �,± ,
� + � � �
• � _� • ,
.� , 1� ,� ��_ �, �� � �
'1 �. �.� . s .'f��� '�
1 ��� ���. xk I
� -� �'� .� _ °�
�,�,:
.�r {
1 �a � f ,p
r.. k`iti` �.�"�i.':�
� � � R+x? 4 d
�
1 � :.������
� ` \ —�,�x`,,�,ll�y
� `
,� � ` ����i�� � � �
�� 11 , � .._ ��,,�,�ll�l��lj� �` '� , ,
:�
,� 1 � ' ''���,II��''���� -� ' •
'` � � ;�. ���i�� ` �
r �l � ., �
. �f� \fi i �
\ � :i�� 1, � \
` � .�, ,.�' `� , ' ,
/ � ���?: �� � ' , ' �
\ ���, ,
�� � s� ������ �
� ��� ,� �, � ,
,� .. �:,� ,
� �.
\� ��.��(� ���i • � � , . .
. IOidfl � � 1
� , �
�\ M `
� � * i
1 ��� /� ,
,� ' "�P"�,.-. , _ `
� � . '.r . . _ _
� ��.� re`X.'� �
�� .�.. ..., : '1
\\\\ r-mec..�+•x-� ,� I
�� � � . � -
.
, : � , -
. i � � �
1 � ' � . ' . -
, _ : _
1
,� � �
�
�
� � ''
�� 1�
/ i1
/ I
� �
��; �
�//�-��
���--�-��
���-��
��,����
--�-� � � �
� �.�- _z�.��-: � .�z� �,,�_ � <��� �--
�
�
lfi � �Y�z•�,2 [� ��y` .� �-��'�f � �z-�:�m�.P
r ,
_
r,,��-�� .��j s �.� �-�.a � �,- ��-- �----�
� ���
���
-,� �-.--�� �
�L�u �� `�- �� � �
���.�� ��ev�> �1 J,� ,�,-�' ��.,,-�-a-- .
� � �.
�-�- �-� u�'�' .
� v-�_�.,---� � U,��--�s� �
,
��'� 2,���-�.. I�
!,J �!Ct-� �S �� c� � r�;1 e��� c'1-i / '�-�--
� p �/'� �.,f
,� �� C/� �� ��.r.�«�IJ1� ��Zt �'c l�`' �F
� `i
,��,` � .� '�-� �-��.�'�_�.,
��'�� �
r�
!
7/�-�
� ��
✓ �`'� ��'�GL<`�j �
1
�� L[-L L c�� C_c�l-u-s.-�i �� �
�� _ /J
��j �"-�_��v$ i��%�— " s �� �l r�.• ._��-
� "
�—��"�'v� �2-v� � C-�P.���--�-�
f
f�d�— �'�i�+�-�� ' ..�y. -� v�,i�
��
� �? ,�^
��1;�--�-•`�-,,, . �'—�'�,'�� .��t._-a'-?rf lr�.z-y �C_,k r d � �
� �
�,[� v
�'� �I" �� ./�---°�t �� � ��-�l ��� � f�
,� , �
� �Q �
�� � �
� �,� � �� ��.-� �,��_ ,4 � 5�����Ca
��� ,� G
� �
� ' LZ-�-i2�4_ l ���'�
� r�i
��y��"\ i�//'�� /�_d_�.
���1 ' � �
Lodge at Vail International W�rig }����'`
Appeal of Anita Sa�tz
Request action:
Related to change in des�gn:
1 . Reloeation of th� �levator away from the apartment
condominiums , as close to the penthouse as passible
� 2 . Move p�nthouse away from apartment condominium units , at
j � least to the distance af the 1993 plans
3 . Decrease the height of the penthouse roof to the level in
the 1993 plans, using a 3 : 12 pitch roof and changing
floor heYght '
4 . Redesign the area under the balconies and condominiurn
units in order ta prevent connection with common elements
of apartment condominium, including the balconies and �he
structural memhers supporting �he balconies and the
cantilevered portians of the condominium units
5 . Reorient stairs in order �:o permit the roof serving the
emergency staircase to be lowered.
6 . Relocate flr eliminate venting on fifth level
R�lated to incomplete material, whe�her or not design is changed
(possible conditions of approval ) :
7 . Require complete plans , sections and elevations ,
identifyinq critical views and features (as requested by
Andy Knudtsen but appar�ntiy not supplied or approved)
(e .g. , plans of each floor showing reconfiguration d�,e to
elevator reloca�ion, sections identifying �tructure of
elevator and views showing relationship af elevator roof
to elevation of condominiums and penthouse, and
elevaticans showing reiationship of elevatar and other new
features �o elevations of condorniniums and penthouse)
8 . Provide design drawings to es�ablish how construction
will avoid the common elements of the condominium
assflciation (as requested by Andy Knudtsen but apparently
not stzpplied or approved} , including but not limited to
the ba�cony and/cantilevered condominium units
9 . Require information and verificatian that there is no
venting and mechanical equipment aver or through the roof
(as reques�ed by Andy Knudtsen but apparently not
sup�pl.ied or approved}
10 . Require verification that the venting out the roof is nat
a kitchen vent, establishing the location of kitchen
venting, and prohibiting venting of odors through roof
11 . Prohibit pen�t�atian, destructi.on or use of cammon
elements of condominium association, whether generai
cammon (consis�.ent with request by Andy Knudtsen but
"41`} apparen�ly not part of final approval }
12 . Prohibit woad-burning fireplace on wes�. side of
penthouse, due to cross-wind effect on condominiums
I � ��• � � C< �� // �-_✓ .
��-"'L n�/i-�_-����! /L� .• -'�
�'�.�
� Agenda last revised (4/2J98 11 am)
�' ;
_n ?T�� �� /_,� �- AESIGN REVIE�'V �OARD AGEl�'DA
�,�,
��yt Apri13, 1996
�
:_,. ��.�-- z�_ 3:OU P.14�.
�'�',� ,-,� ,�����..
PRUJECT��tIENTAT�O�i /LUNCH 12:3d
SITE V�SITS �-, -. 1.45
:��j__���-�
1. Town of Vail - E, Lionshe�d Bus Stop ,
2. Lion Square Lodge - 660 «✓. Lionshead Place U ���'f
3. Sirotkin- 14l S '��esthaven Drive �Z'� �t d�r
4. Arr�old Residence- 1827 Alpine Drive � '���"'� `����
e �-.��z-,
5. Gray R.csidcnce - 2672 Kinnickinnick Court �J --�
6. Rath - 2399 Chamonix Lanc �� ; C �'�1�Q�� /
7. Muell�r- 3152 Booth Fal�s Court ��
l_ ./� -1���� __--__-�--
8. I`vlay Residence- I067 Ptarnaigan Road ,� /�-a'�%
9. Hubcap - 143 East Meadow Drive
�S' _-,'t_�.-,y�'ti`�--t rz-' `� ,�>�.i's `�i c/ �`r
Dri�•cr- G e�r��e �
�
, -� �� ��--�;�/ ;_
_ r� f s
�� '� ��_� ,c-Lc. ; ,.-�=1
1. Sir�tkin- Conceptual review of a residential addition. GK
1�15 `Westhaven�rive��ot 52, Glen Lyon Subdivision
Applicant: Neil Sirotkin
MOT`I{JN: SECOND: VOTE:
2. Inter�ational Wing -Appeal o#'the Zoning Administrator's decision to appr�ave a AK
buffer to be built between a proposed additiQn and the cxisting condomini�ns.
174 E. Gore Creek Drive/portions of Lots A, B, and C, B�ock SC, Vail Village 1 st Filing
Appellant: Ms. Anita Saltz
MOTIC►N: SECOND: VOTE:
3. Lian Square Lod�e - Lobby addition and site area improve�nents 1C
6b0 West Lionshead Place/Lat 1, Vail Lionshead 1 st Filing, 1 st Addition
Applicant: John Railtan, representing the Lion Square Ladge Condor�inium Association
MQTION� SECOND: VOTE:
1
� � -� . �
4. Gray Residence- Changes to appravcd p�an� �'�
2672 Kinnickinnick CourtlLot 6, Block 2, Vail Intermountain
Applicant: Harry Gray
MOTION: SECdNI�: VOTE:
5. Towm of Vail - East L.ionshead bus stop renovation �-W
Applicant: Town af Vail
MOTION: SEC4ND. VaTE:
6. Mueller- Final review of a new duplex R$
3152 Booth Falis CourtJLot 4, Block 2, Vail Village 32th Filing
Applicant: John I��iueller
MOTION: SECt)ND: VOTE:
7. Arnold -Conceptual review of a new single family residencc R5
1827 Alpine llrivelLot 45, Vail Village West, Filing#1
Applicant: Steve Arn�old
MOTION: SECOIVD: VOTE:
8. May - Conceptual re�-iew of a new single family resadence G�
i067 Ptarmigan Road/i,ot 4 and VVU2 of�, Block 5, Vail Villagc 7th
Agplicant: Roy and Paula May
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
9. Hubcap -Interior expansion and addition of a second outdoar dining area. Dh'�
143 East l�eadow DrivelLot P, Block 5D, Vail `Iilla�e lst Filing (Crossroads}
Applicant: Lance Lucey
MOTIQN: SECdND: V�QTE:
2
y , � �
1{l. Rath - Concept�al re�-ie�v af a new single family residence. DM
2399 Ghamonix Lane-'LQt 17, Block A, Vail Das Schonc
Applicant: Milce Roth
MOTI�i�1: SEC�ND: VOTE:
��EIVIBERS PRESENT MEMSERS ABS�NT
Staff A�ro�-al s
Chicago Fizza - Sign. JC
1031 W. Frouta�e Rd., Unit F
Applicant: Greg Kraft
Vaij Associates, Inc. - Sign. L'�
27$ Hanson Ranch Raad/Bridge Street I,odge
Appiicant: Larry Ast
Mueller Duplex- Plan ehanges. RS
3155 �ooth Falls Ct./Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Village 12th FilFn�
Applicant: Johann M�eller
VVD Condos -Replace exterior siding with stucco LW
1527 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 10, Block 3, Vail Valley 1 st Filin�
Applicant: �-Iormel Foods Gorp
Senderos - Window rep�acement. LW
6�Q Vail Valley Drive/Pinos del Norte
Applica�t: Manuel Senderos,Unit 1
King-Window changes LW
1881 Lionsr�dge Loog#25Nail Pointe#25
Applicant: I'vFatt King
Spraddle Creek Estates, Lot 2 - Plan revision. L�
1058 Riva G�enlLot 2, Spraddle Creek Estates
Applicant: SBC Deveiopment Corp.
3
� � � , , „
Johnson Residenee-Minor exteriar changes. L��
2705 Davos TraillLot 14, Block B, Vail Rid�e Su�divisian
Applicant: Michelle Johnson
Innsbruck Meadows- Regrading of driveway and revised iandscaping. �R I
2832-2842 Kinnickinnick RoadlLots 1-6, Innsbruck Meadows Subdivision
Applicant: Bab Borne
McIntyre - Exterior changes to existing residcnce L;'�
1462 Aspen Grove Lane/T ot 11, Block 2,Liansridge Filing#4
Applicant: Scott Mclntyre
l�ail Villaae Inn -New sen�ice dvor. L�'�
1(10 Ea�t?��feadow DriveNail Villa�e Inn
Applican� Josef Staufer
Si�n language interpretataon available upan request with 24 hournot�fication. Please ca11479-2114 voice or 479-235G TDD for
izlfonnation.
4
,
� � LAW OFF9CE5 �
DU N N , ABPLAN.ALP cx CH RISTENSEN, P. C.
A PI70FESSIONAL CORP4aPTIpN
JOHN W. DUNN iTHE VAIL BANK BUIL�ING TELEPMONE:
ARTNUR A.ABPLAMALP,JR, SUITE 304 (`�701 476-0300
ALLEN C.CMRISTENSEN
DIANE L. HERMAN 108 SOUTH F{20NTAGE ROAD WEST TELECOPIER:
i97074J6-4765
R. C.5TEPHEMSON VAIL, CQLORA�O 81557
KAREN M. OUNN
SP�eIAL COUNS€L: CEATIFIED LEGA�A$SOSTANt
JERRY W. HANNAH
3 Apri1 1995 �_Jt r lCy1-.; fi �� � �
Design Review Board '��f� �✓���
Town of Va�l �,.
75 South Frontag� Raad West �'�.c_ cv-� �� '����/ �
Vail CO (�
I�e: Lodge at Vail Internationa� Wing
This Firm represents Ms . Anita SaJ.tz , the owner of Condorn�nium
Unit 527, The L�dge at Vail Apartment Condominiums , on whase behalf
this letter is being directed to you. This afternoon, the Vail
Design Review Board is scheduled to consider an appea� of a staff
decision approving modifications to the plan of the Lodge a� Vail
International Wing. For the reasons set forth in this letter, aur �
client req�ests that the appeal be eontinued until the next
scheduled hearing of the Design Review Board, and that appropriate
directian be given to the Tozan of VaiT staff to permit
consideration at that ti�e.
The basis for the r�quested continuance is the fact that the
Town of Vail staff, and particu�.arly the Tawn Attorney, has refused
to permit the examination of the actual file within the custody of
the Town vf Vail since the action fram which this appeal is taken.
Notwithsta�ding a request under the P�blic Records Aet, that
materiai has not �aeen Frovided. Qn one occasion, on the 22nd of
March, we were permitted to review copies of material apparently
taken from that f�Ie, but even that has been denied since that
time. As recently as Monday, the Town At�orney has directed us to
review the file at the Eagle County Dist�ict Court, where he has
continually ind�.cated that the enti�e record is located.
Today, we zeceived a "Fourth Supple�mental Certification of the
Desiqnated R�cozd" which apparently covered �:he period since mid-
January, estab�ishing that the documents which we have sougl�t to
review had npt been lc�dged with the District Court un.til Monday of
this week. Any trip to the Eagle County District Court based upan
the Town Attorney' s assurance ws�uld have been futile and reliance
upon that direction would have been without foundation. Our client
would have incurred significant expense with no result.
Fortunately, we d.id not believe that the Town Attorr�ey' s statements
were correct, but we were correctly convinced that ths record which
we sought to review had not been cer�ified to the Dsstrict Court,
but couTd only be found across the street from aur office, in the
Town' s own records .
Our efforts to review these records has been cont�nuous since
the time this appeal was filed and, in fact, began with that
appeal . The chronology fallows :
, � �
March 14 - Letter filing appeal - requested review of material
related to apgeal
March 19 - Letter to Town Attoz�ney, pursuant to instructions f�om
Andy Knudtsen, requesting review of material related to appeal
March 22 - Let�ex to Town Attorney, identifyi�g missing material
and requesta.ng opportunity ta review the original file and rni5sing
material .
March 25 - Letter to Town Attorney, identifying more specifically
the missing ma�erial .
March 27 � Le�.�er f�om Town Attorney advising that missing
documents "are not saved or maintained"
March 27 - Letter tr� Town Attarney in response to explanation of
missing material
March 28 - Letter �a Town Attorney requesting opportunity ta review
original file, or, in the alternative, the copies previously
provided
April 1 - Letter to Town Attorney attempting �Q �confirm refusal to
permit review of either original £ile or copies of original file .
April 1 - Lett�r to Town Atto�ney con£ir�ing refusal to permit
review of either original file oz copies of original file.
.
Aprf1 1 - Fourth Supplemental Cer�ification of the Designated
Recard - establishing transmittal of documents (represented to have
already been in the Court file} which were mailed to Court two days
before this hearing.
These documents are attached t� this letter, for your reference,
with the pertinent references highlighted where necessary.
�ased upon the foregaing circumstances, we request that the
appeal hearing scheduled for this date be �ontinued until the next
�esign Review Board hearing, and that the Town Attorney and
Department of Community Develvpment be directed to permit public
inspection of the actual file in this matter, rather than copies
whi�h any office may choose ta make available.
Thank you for your cons�deration of this problem.
V uI our
,
DUNN, A AN F & H� � - ENSEN;'� .C.
r
G���,-�
Arthur A. A p ; al , Jr. ;
;
; �
�/r �
LAW OFFfGES
DUN� ABPLANA'LP & CHRISTE�N, P.C.
A/PIO/LSf10NAL COH►OMATEON
JOMN W. OUNN VAIL '�ANK BUILDINC 7ELEPMONE;
. ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP.JR.
ALLEN C. CHR[STENSEtY
SUITE 30Q (3033 470-030p
OIANE L. HERMAM I09 SOUTFi FRONTMGE ROAD WESS TELECQP1ERe
(3031 a76-a76S
racciw�counsE�:
Va.�L. COLOFA00 81637
JERRY W. HI.NNAH
KAREN M. DI,FNM
CENTIFIEO LEG.��u,5915TJ�w7
.14 March 1996
Town Council
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road W�st
Vail CQ
, V�A TELECOPIER AIV'D ViA FEDERAI, �XPRESS
Tc�wn of Vail Planning and �
Environmental Commissi.on ��
75 South Frontage Road West � ��'I
Vail CO �
VIA TELECOPIER AND VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS �'1.�`CSL
Re : Lodge at Vail International wing
Dear Sir or Madam:
This Firm represents Ms . Anita Saltz, the owner of Condominium
Unit 5Z7, The Lodge at Vail Apartment Condominiums, on whose behalf
this letter is bei.�g direc�ed to you .
By tha.s letter, Ms . Anita SaLtz appeals the action of the Town
of Vail Depa.rtment of Comrnunity Deveiogment and, to the extent and
if any action was t�ken, the Town o� Vai1 Design Revi.ew Bdard,
approving certai.n revised plans of The' Lodge at Vail znternational
Wing. Despite repeated requests for information and nc�tice of
consideration of proceedings, no�ice was not provided of either
s�af� consideration or of any consideration by the Design Review
Baard. For the reasons no�ed below, there is uncertainty �rom the
recara regarding the nature of the action which purports to apprave
the plans which apparently h�ve, samehow, been given approval by
the Town of Vail .
The Town Councii considerea and gave conditi.onal approval tq
the Lodge International Wing in early DecemLer, I995 , despite
objectians by adjacent awners based upon both d�szgn and trespass
into the comr�on elements flf the Lodge Apartm�nt Condor�inium. The
Council was assured by the develaper that no trespass occurred
under the ofiered plan, and imposed anly the condition that the
plan be redesign�d to increase �he buffer betwee*� the Internatir�na,l
Wing penthouse structure and the affected Lodge Apartment
condaminiums . The develaper then submitted a revised proposa� to
the Department of Community Dsvelopment which confirmed the
exis�ence o� the trespass pr�wious�y ic3entified in the plan
presented to, considered and conditionally ap�roved by the Town
' � �
Counci.I . Tha� revised plan was disapproved by the Department of
Community Development staff, at which time interested partzes were
eff�ctively eut off from negQtiations which occurr�d hetween staff
and the developer.
�n the 12th of Masch, 1996, this Firm �eceived notice that a
rev�,sed plan for the Lodge at Vail Interna�ional Wing had been
approved by �he Town of Vail . It is that approval whieh is the
subject o� this appeaZ . .
Ini�i.ally, there is uncertainty regarding th� source of the
approva.l, and therefore th� nature of the appeal . The Town Counc�l
referred the plan cons�dered by i.t in December back to the
Depart�nent af Community Develapanent staff. However, the "approved"
plan provided by the Town o� Vaa.l indicates that it was "Approved
by the Town of Vail Design Review Board - March 7, 1996" , and also
indicates tha� i� was "Approved by Staff - Andy Knudtsen - 3/7/g6" ,
Therefore, the Tawn ' s reeor�i indicates that approval may have
vccurred either by the Design Review Soard ar by staff, or by both.
We shall rely upon the Town to determine who took the action and to
direct this appeal to the anpropriate body, in accardance with the
Vaa.I Municipal Code .
With reference to the reasons far this appeal , they are
multiple:
I . The plan whzch was provided and identified as that
receiving Town of Vail appraval is virtualTy unintelligibl,e, but,
tn the extent it is intelligible, it clearly has no relationship to
that which was appraved by �he Town touncil . Therefore, the
applic�tion must be initiated as a new prace�s, rather �han being
subject to wholesaie redesign at the discretion af Community
Deve�opment staf�.
2 . The new plan has an area which is �etween Condominzum
Unit 527 and 533, on the west, and the penthous� structure, on the
east, which as nat labeied, diagramed, or '�he subject af any
elevation, anci which was not included on the prior plan. It may be
an �levator shaf�, and it may have a sloping roof or a flat r�df .
It may be two feet high, or it may be tweive fe�t high. �vo
information has been provzded which gives any in�orma�ion regarding
these questions ,
3 . Neither the "Roof Plan" nor the "RQaf/Plan�er Section"
identifies the Iacation of the latter seetion. One can anly
speculate even as to whether the Ladge Apartment Condominium is on
�he left or ri.ght of that sectian, but it is clear that the latter
does not represent a s�ction indicating the size or impact o� the
structure whicl� apparently is planned adjacent to Units 527 and
533 .
' � �
When, and if, our client and the other objectors are provided
w�th any additional plans which are necessary to make
unde�standable thase two crcaps which were provided to us, i� may he
able to identify with speeificity other proble
Yc are not now e . s letter, in addition t�
initiating the appeal as set forth above, we again request copies
of all submittals, maps, plans, corresgondence and other material
presented to the Town af Vail in association with this matter, or
exchanged between the Tawn of Vaii and the applzcant.
Ve truly y rs�
UNN, ABP NAL & RI NSEN,
/ �,,_ ' /
���-..�
Art�ur A. Abp� , �7r .
xc: Ms . Anita Saltz
Mr _ Tom Moorhead
Ms . Ann Frick
Mr . Jay Pet�rson
�
' LAW OPFICES
� DUI`�y ABPLANAL.P � CHRISTE{��N , P. C.
A pR�FE55iONwl[6RPpqwT�(ye�
JQHN W, pUNN THE VAII BANK BU�LDING TELEPNONE'
AFiTHUR A.ABP�A.NA�P,JR. SUIT'� JOO �9�01 u76-0300
ALLEN C. CHR157ENSEN
OIANE l_ HEqMAN ��8 S4UTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST TELECOPIER:
i1. C.STEPHEN$QH VAIL, COLOFA00 81657
f970� s76-a765
KAq�N tH. DVNN
SPECIAI COUNSEL: C[�n�iCO LEGw�a55i5FANT
JERRY W. NqNNAH
].9 March 1996
Mr. Tom Moorhead
Town Attorney
Town of Vaa.l
Vail CO
VTA TELECOPIER
Re : International Wing - LQdge at VaiZ
Dear Tam:
Andy Knudsen has adrrised me that we shoul.d now contact you in
order to arrange an opportuni.ty to review the file with reference
to the Internationai Wing, including that portion of th� file
created subsequent to the I�ecember decision of the Town Council
which is now in litigation . You are, therefore, the custodian of
�.hese records und�r CRS 24-72-201, et seq .
We understand that a decision was made by the Town of Vail on I
th� 7th of March to approve an amended pian. As you are aware, we
hav� appealed that decision on behalf of our client, An.ita Saltz .
I attempted to contact you yesterday and today in order to
inform�l].y make arrangements for the review of the material which
has been delivered to or is in the possession of the Town af Vail
related to the Inter
to return m ca Therefore, the purpase of this let-�er is to
y re�ues�, pursuant to CRS 24-72-201 , et seq. , the
opportunity to review and, to the extent deemed necessary, to copy,
all records in the possession of the Town of Vaii which have been
developed by, submitted �o, or othez-wise cc�me into the p�ssession
of the To•,an oL Vail , si.nce th� 4th of December, 1995 , and are
related to the Lodge at Vail International Wing .
Please contact me at 476-�300 and eithes advise me or �eave a
message regarding the tim� when this material can be inspect�d and
copied . In accordance with CRS 24-72°243 ( 3 ) , I request that the
�time set he within thr@e working days of the date of this letter .
V���r�.�y yours��
� �
I3UNN, ABPL,ANALP 6 HRrSTENSEN, P C .
% �� ' � �� �/
�,� �---� ��wt �--� �
Arthur A. AbplanaZp, Jr, / J
xc : Mr. and Mrs . Jack Saltz � ,��
LAw OFFICES
, DUN �ABPLANA,LP �c CHRISTE�N , P. C,
♦P4p�C5510N11 LOflPORAt'ION
JOHN W. DUNN TMQ VAIL BANK BUILDING T�I.EPNONE:
ART1iUR A.ABPLANALp,JR. �jUITE 30Q �9��� a76-0300
ALLEN C. CHii15TENSEN
DIANE t. HERMAN IOB SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST 7ELECOPIER'
R. C.STEPHENSON VAIL, COLORA00 81fi57
C970> 476-a765
h4AREN M. OVNM
SPECIAL COUrvSEI: G£ATI►IEG LEGaL�S�Sr.+.N�
JERRYW. HANNAH L� Mazeh �77�
Mr. Tom Moozhead
Town Attorney
Town of Uail
Vai 1. CO
VSA TELECOPI�R
Re : In�.ernational Wing - LodgE at Vail •
Dear Tom:
As you are �ware, earlier this week I requested the
opportunity to review the Town ' s file for the International Wing of
the Lodqe at Vail . I was advised that the fzl,e would be made
available at Noon taday. At noon today, I was permitted to review
a nurnber af documents which were apQarently drawn from that file,
bu� I was not permitted to zeview the �i.le . Theze can be no
question that a numriez� of maps were not provided, and that at leas�
one staff inemorandum was not sunplied.
The documents which were readily iden�ified as missing
included the following maps , to which r�ferenc� is made in two
€nemoranda in the fiFe :
Ma�s referred to in Zehren and Associates memorandum dated
2/25/96 : Maps A1 . 1 and AI . 2
Maps referred to in Zehreri and Associates memorandum dated
2f16/96 : Maps A� . 1 , A4 . 1 , A4 . 2 , A4 . 3 and A4 . 4
I am in possession af one staff inemorandum which was written
a�ter the beginning of the year, which I obtained earlier, but
which was not acnong the material supplied, This omission
illustrates th�e problem with the fact t�at I was not provided �he
apportunity ta r�v.iew the file, as required by law. I have no idea
what othez documents are in the fil�, or what documents have been
removed frorn the fi1e, but tY�e public is entit�ed �o review that
file .
Please make arrangements to produce the actual, fils tha.s
afternoon, in order that Y en.ight i.nspec� what it actually contains ,
at least at this point in tirne .
Very tru�y you=s; -�
J .``i� �" ' �"1
i?UNN, ABPL.ANALP '& CHRIST�.�iS�EN, P .G .
�. � /� ,
r .__-�
/ �
Arthur A. Abplanal Jr. `;
�J
LAW OFFICES
DlJ N�,ABPLANALP �c CH RISTEN�Pd , P. C.
•PRpf£55tOn�AL CORPORATI6N
JOHN W, DUNN{ TME VAIL BANK BUILDING TELEPHONE:
ARTHUR A.ABPLqNAiP,JR. SUITE 300 (9701 a76-p304
A�LEN C. CHRISTENSEN
IOB SOUTN FR�ONTAGE ROAD WEST TELECOPIER;
OIAME L. I�+ERMAN (970) 476-4769.
R.C. STEPHENSQN VAIL, COLORADO 81657
I(AREN M. OUNN
SPECIAL CQU�SEL: CERTIFf�iS LEGALA55157�reT
JERRY W. HANNAFi
25 Maxch 199F
Mr. Tom Moorhead
Tawn Attorney
Town of Vail
Vail CO '
'JIA TELECOPIER
Re: International Wing - Lodge at Vail
Dear Tom:
You are aw�re that there is pending a request for an
oppor�unity to r�view �he actual file on the above matter, in order
to idc�ntify and obtain copies af material which we have not been
provided. I have specifical�y re�uested a number af maps which
were submitted in February, and you inda.cated taday that no
prngress could be made on that matter Ya�cause Andy Knudtsen was out
o� town today.
In order to faeili'tate your effort to obtain and provide the
rnaterial which has not been provided to us, and to assis� you in
yQUr conversatians with Andy Knudtsen, I� have identified a number
o£ documents and i.tems which I have been able to estabZish, based
upon the information whic� I was permitted to review, wer� provided
to the Town of Vail but not included in the material � was
permitted to inspec� :
1 . Response to reques� for detailed statement "addressing
the Conditons of Approval. from the Desi.gn Review Board approval of
November 1, 1495" (referred to in letter to Clark Atkinson ftom
Andy Knud�sen dated 31 January 1996 , which fallows this letter) ;
2 . Information sub�itted by axchitects on February 2 , 1996
(referred to in letter to Peterson from Andy Knudtsen dated
February 7 , 1996 , which follows this letter) ;
3 . Maps submitted by arGhitects on February 16 , 1996
(referred to in memorandum to Town of Vail 2-1fi-96 , which fol�.ows
this letter) and identified as follows :
A1 . 1 (dated 2-16-96 }
A4 . 1 (da�ed 2-16-96 )
A4 ,2 (dated 2-16-95 )
A4 . 3 (dated 2-15-95 )
A4 . 4 (da�ed 2-1�-95 )
" � �
4 . Ma�s submitted by archa.tects on February 26 , 1.996
(refer�red to in me�orandum to Town of Vail 2-16-96 , which follows
this ietter) and identified as follows :.
A1 . 1 {dated 2-16-95 )
A1 . 2 (dated 2-16-9s )
Natu�ally, while we can identify the foregoing items which,
wi�h the po�sibJ.e exception af Item #1 (which may not have been
submitted at this time} , havE been received by the '�'own, we stil.�
wish to a.nspect the file. Natwa.thstanding what I am certain is
your good faith statement that all developments have been :forwarded
to the District Court, we have reviewed the lists of items the Town
has provided, and which are intended to identify thase items which
have been farwarded �o the District Court to sugpTemen� the record.
Those supplements do not include the above informatian and
material .
Very truly yours,
�
� r,
DUNN, ABPLANALP & CHRISTENSEN, P.C .
f �
��� �� !rY+�/�.�'✓• /
Arthur A. AbpZanalp, Jz. /'
� ; /
� �,
xc : Mr. anc� Mrs . Jack Sa1�z
.
- � �' i � ��.-��__
�"` To �',r� t ,� l...1'7il.�n From rCr''` ` r'^,,,�� tl
� �1 � C`.4.� CA
�� Fhcne� pf��
l� �(1 Gi��,'(G-�
T�b�OF �.�II, F�. ,� ?b_ y ,� �x
75 Souzn Front¢ge Raad ,G►�cce of rhe 7'o��n�ittorn�v
G�ai� Colora�do 81657 �
974-�f 9--2107/�'ar 970-479-2157
?viarch 27, a 996
VI:� T`�LE , A7 ]� ,
.�nhur.A,. Abplan:�Ip, Jr., E,quire
T7unn, AbpIanalg &: C�ziS'�nsen. P.C.
108 S_ Front.:�e Roaa. Suite 3a4
'G'ail. CO 816�7
�2e: Salu�'�%eI?s ti�. L�d�e �'rcperties, �nc., �t aI.
��r�rt:
Iz�z�spon�to ��a�.lr r�q�est for m�ps svbzrz:.�t�i by archir.etits oe�Febru3�: I 6, I 996 and �'eb��26,
1996, th�se zr° not p�� of the r-^ord at �his�me �s the - �.t• re�•ious xterrt� C_�
e�'ort �a� aeea�,buff'�r_ I��e se�•eral it�rati�ns of a desi�be:ore one is subrnit��d w-hich
is �.ce�tab]e zo t��e To��n and thc �npficant are not save� or m�:ai��d 3s �az��f t��e �
are na lor����r ��-� w• T e r�cor�_ e ��.ai c�.�s,�r-.L w ch �ti�zs approved b��
st�i oa farch 7, I99�, and�.�-�ich h�s been app�e ;r Ani�.a Salrz, is p� o;�the ��cc�rd and w�
sez�,�ed upon rlair.� Salcz rhrou� vcur o�c�..
If}�au are:n�ssesson of a me:nar:nauzza ar other dxum�nt� ��at hai�e �tot beea made ��zt of d�e
aff'icia! xec�rd, ple�.se �ubmit the�to me ior re.�i�ti��so tha� ar:;.�is ,�_ :nev can be resalved.
ti't'.N CCIZE�S" �'4L7,I'S. �
�� � �
�
R. Thomas ?�Taor�ea�
Taw�s� 4ttc�m,ey
��G"au°
hC' L�'1C��' Fi171.uC�t5e:1
} �•?�i.."f'CdF_DP.iPE'E '
�t
, • � �p,W OFFICE5 �
DUNN , ABPLANALP gc CHRIST�NSEN , P.C.
A RROFESSIONI,L CORPORATION
JOHN W, DU1JN THe VAIL BANK BLJILDING YELEPNON�;
� ART}iUR A.A9PLANALP�JR. SVJITE 30O �9��� '��6-0300
ALLIEN G CHRISTENSEN T�4ECOPtER:
DIANE L. HERMAM IOB SQUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST
f970) a76-a765
R.C.5TEPHENSON �/AIL, CaLORa�O B i fi57
KAREN M. DUNN
SPLCfAL CCUtiSEL. CEATfiIED IEGAL,A55157ANT
JERRY W. HANNAN
27 March 1996
Mr. To�n Moorhead
Town At�orney ,
°I'c�wn of Vail
Vail Co
VZA TELECOPIER ,
fte: Lodge at Vail International Wing
Dear Tom:
With respect, it is not possible to believe that the Tawn has
disposed of all plans and matera.al which was discussed during the
evolution of the International Wing design review plan, unless �hat
was a calculated ef�ort to eliminate the possibilty of review by
the public . It i� , on �.he o�her hand, possibl.e to believe (and
consi.stent with past exge�ience) that the file has be�n "sanitized"
and that the maps and vther material are not in the file but tucked
away in some se�re� place.
With reference tca the material wh�.ch was grev�ous].y in �he
fi.].e, bu� has been removed, we sh�ll �preserue that for use at a
later time, in order that the more likely of the two above
scenarios might be established.
Never�.heless , you have my thanks for your letter.
_ _ - ---- -.,}
Very truly ,yaurs ,
t � �
, � / `� ,
;�DUNN, ABP�LANAL�P &��HR15rTENSEN,, F .C .
�- �� � �,.
Arthur A. Abplana p, Jr.
'� LAW OFFICES
DU N N� ABPLANALP �e CH R15TEN�N , P, C.
�PAO�CSSIQNAL CORPOA'LTIDN
JOHN W. DUNN TNE VAIL BANFG BUIIDINCa TELEPWONE;
ARTNUR A.A4PUlNALP�JR. ''�,,`UITE 300 �`�7Q, 4��g-0300
ALLEN C.CHRISTEP+I9EN
41AlVE L. MEFiMAN 108 SOUTrI 'rrRONTAGE Roao WESr TEL£COpiER:
f970) �i76-4765
R.C.STEPHENSUN VAIL. COlORA00 81657
1(AR€M M. DUN1.1
CEATIFIE�LECiAL wS515TaN7
SPECIe.L COUHSEL. p
JERRYW. HANNAN Zp MC��C� 1996
Mr. Tom Moorhead
Town Attorney
Town of Vail
Vail CO
VIA TELECOPIER — 'Y79-�/S�'
Re: Inteznational Wing ° Lodge at Vail '
Dear Torn:
It is necessary that I take anather look at whatever �he Town
of Vail chooses to make available to me relat�d ta the above
project . I abviously feel that I am entitled to see the actual
file, but your feel differen�ly. If that is anly the copies which
were made availab]�e last Frid�y, that is what I shall deal with.
I would like tv review th� material which you choose �o make
available this afternoon, between 1 : 00pm and 3 : OOpm. Please let me
know whether that is acceptable . You or Anne may call tha.s office
at 476-0300 . You may leave a message if i am not available .
V� trir�.y yo s ,
N ANALP I � EN .
U N� AB & C S ,
_ j
Arthur A. Abplanal , Jr.
�
� LA�N �FFIGES
DU N N;,ABPL.ANALP Se CH RISTEN�N , �. C.
A PAOf4$SIONAL CORPO�i�7�ON
JOHN W. �UNN Thi��VA�L BANK BUILOING TELEPMONE:
ARTHUR A..ABPL4NALP,JR. $uiTE 30O f9701 67fi-0300
ALLEN C.CNRISTENSEN
DIANE L. HERMAN 108 S�UTH FRQNLAGE ROAO WE57 TELEGOPIER:
i9707 476-a765
R.C.5TEAMENSOM VA14, CQLQRADO 81657
KAREN M. 6UNN
SPECIAL C04NSE�: CEATi�iE�LEGa4�SSi5T4NT
JERRY W. HANNAN 1 April 1996
Mr. Tom Maoxhead
Town Attorney
Town of Vail
Vaii CO
VIA TELECOPIER TQ { 970} 479-2Z57
Re : Internat�.onal Wing - Lodge at Vail '
Dear Tom:
T have received no respanse to my letters of last week
requ�sting the oppnrtunity to review the above fi�e {or the portian
which you permitted me �o review on the 22nd of March) Qr to
several telephone calls . Am I to assume that fur�her access to the
material whose review I have requested is being denied?
You may contact me at 476-Q300 . P�ease leave a message if Z
am not available .
Ver� truly o rs ,
DUNN, A ��AL & CHRTSTENSEN, P .G.
Ar r �,bplanalp, ,7r.
� LAW OFFICES
�UNN , ABPLANALP �c CHRfSTEN�N , P. �C.
A VROFE5510r+AL CORPORATION
JONN W. DFJNN THE VAIL BANK BUILOING TE�EPMONE:
ARTHUR A.ABPLANALP,JF2. SUITE 300 �g��� '�76-0360
ALLEN C.CHRISTENSEhI
OIANE L. HERMAN 108 SOUTH FRONFAGE Rono WESr TELECO�PfER:
C9701 47E5-4765
F. C.STEPMENSON �/All., COL4RA�0 81657
KAREN M. ❑[JNN
S�ECIAI COUnSEL. � CERTIPlED LLWL ASSIS�TAN7
JEFiRY W. }1ANNAli � APZl.� L77U
Mr. Tam Moorhead
Town Attorney
Town of Vail
Vail CO
VIA TELECOPIER TO ( 970j 479-2T57
Re : International Wing - Lodge at Vail '
Dear To�t:
This letter will confirm our conversation of this afternoan,
during which you advised me that I will nat be permitted to examine
either the �ctual file in the above matter or th� copy of portions
of the fiZe whieh I was perrttitted �a review on the 22nd caf March.
Yo� have advised me tha� both the actual file and the copies will
be in active use until the time of the hearing an wednesday. It is
also your position that ouz request to review the file in order to
prepare for the appeal on W�dnesday is harassment, notwithstanding
the fact tha�. we have nat been permi�ted �.o review the actual file
a.n this action since the time the d�cision was made in early March,
despite repeated requests . You have instructed me to review �he
file certified to the Eagle County District Court, which I have
advised y�u is incomplete .
If I am in error regarding my understanding af the Tawn ' s
position with re�ezence ta the denial of any opportuni.ty to review
this file or the copi�s which were grovided of parts af it, and I
am to be permitted to review the actual file or the materfal. which
I was permitted to review on the 22nd of March, I shall rely upon
you to advise me of that fact .
Vez ru y ou ,
D NN, AB LP .& TENSEN,
Arthur A. Abpl.an , ,7r.
� � � � � � � V ��
DISTRICT CaURT, CO�TY �F EAGLE, STF�TE OF COLOF�,a,D4 �
r� , Z �
Civil Action No. 95 CV 362
FOURTH SLIPPLEMENTAL CEr�TIFIGATION OF THE �ESiGNAT�D P,ECORD
ANITA SALTZ,
Plainfiff,
v.
LO�G� PRG»E°TIES, 'k��C.; i 01,l1lN OF VAIL, 2 R1Uf11C:paf ccrporatiora; T�V'�!N CC)UNC!!� OF
TI�E TOWN OF V,4�L; and 80B ARMOUR, SYBILL NAVAS, PAUL R. JOHNSTON,
MARG,�RET A. OSTERFOSS, K�V1N R. FQL�Y, MICHA�L D. JcWE i i and ROB FORD, as
the Town Couneil af tt�e To4vn of Vail,
Defen�ants,
and
LUANNE WE�LS,
Plaintiff,
us. �
�.ODGE PROPERTIES, iNC. and THE TOWN OF VAI�, C�QLOP,,^-,DO, and its agents, in their
o�ic�al capacities, namely, THE TOWN CQIJE�CIL, TOWN MANAGcR, TOWN ATTQRNEY,
PLANNING AND ENVIF�ONMENTAL COMMlSSaON, �ESiGN RcVIEW BOAR�, ANDY
KNUDTSEN, in his onicial capacity as Senior Pi�nner and Zonina Administrator, and DAN
STANEK (sic}, in his ofricial capacity as THE BUfLDING AQMINlSTRATQR,
Defendants.
COMES NOW, Hally McGutcheon, Town Clerk for th� Town of Vaii, upon being
duly cautioned �nd sworn staies tha ein d contem�craneo�s'� herewith is th� fo
suppl�men�t t�o��h,e�uthentic recard of the Tawn of Uail which has be=n previcusly ident�ried by
�arties as the d�signated record. This record i�as be�n maintGined in the regular caurse or
ANITA SALTZ & �UANN�'ELLS, PI.AINTIFFS V. � EXHIBIT A
LODGE PROPERTIES, INC. & TOINN 4F VAIL, ET AL.
Case No. 95 CV 362 (Internationai Wing)
INDEX �F FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL FILED 04 01 96
VI_ Supplementai Do ments
' 2. Letter d ed 01.i 7.96 m A. Knudtsen to J. Peterson re: proposed archi#ectural
r fferin een decks on third floor with attach�d �etters af eoncern
3. Letter da#ed n1.19,96 from J. Brawn to A. Knudtsen requesting inforrtiatian
4. Letter dated 01.29.96 from A. Knudtsen to J. Brown
5. Letter dated Q1.31.96 from A. Knudtsen to C. Atkinson
6. Letter dated 02.Q7.96 fram A. Abplanalp to A. Knudtsen with attached
Memorandum dated 05.18.83
7. Letter dated 02.09.96 fram A. Knudtsen to A. Abplanalp
8. Letter dated 02.�5.96 from R. T. Nloorhead to A. Abplanalp
9. Letter dated 02.07.96 from A. Knudtsen to J. Peterson re: buffering at the
Internatiana! Wing - Staff review of prapose� changes
1 Q. Letter dated 02.15.96 from J. Peterson to A. Kn�udtsen
� 11. �etters of 7ransmittal dated 02.19.96, Q2.26.96, and 03.Q6.96 from Zehren &
Associate5, lnc., to Town Of�;/ail Community Development 'Depa�tmPnt
12. Praject drawings from Zehren & Associates, Inc., af the �.odge at Vail Ir�ternational
Wing Roaf Plari and Roof/Planter Section
13. Letter dated 03.04.96 from J. Baifey, Jr. to J. Dunn, R.T. Moorhead, a�d A. Frick
14. Handwritten notes of A. Knudtsen dated 03.05.96
15. Letter dated 03.05.96 �rom A. Frick to A. Knudtsen wi�h attach�d subpoena and
�heck
16. Letter dated 03.05.96 from A. Frick to H. McCutcheon with attached subpoena
1
� � �
the Town vf Vail's business s�bjeet to my contral. Such supplemental record is identified on the
attached index (Exhibit A).
�
Hally L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk
STATE OF C�LORADO )
) ss.
�OUNTY OF EAGLE ) .
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me an ',�' day af April, ,
1996, by Holly L. McCutcheon, as Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, State of Colorado.
Witness my har�d and official se�ne E.wrigtst,Notary Pubiic
My Commission Expires 6�17-1999
!1.�y C�rnmission expires �'5 S.Frorrtage Road
f,c %���,�� ���:( .1.�.;--�
Notar}� Pul�lic ,•
CERTIFfCATE QF MAILING
� � hereby certify tha# a true and correct co�y of the fore oing Suppiemental
Certifcation of the Designated Recorci was mail�d t� the follawing o t�e � �r day af April, 1996
6y U.S. Mail, postage prepaid to the follow�ng: ,
Ann B. Frick, Esquire
Lia A. Woodall, Esquire
Jacobs Chase Frick Kleinkflpf 8� Kelley LLC �
1050 17th S#re�t, Suite �500
Denver, CO 80265
.Joi�n W. Dunn, �squire
Dunn, Abplanalp & Christensen, P.C.
148 S. Frontage Road, Suite 300
Vail, CO 81657
James S. Bailey, Jr., Esq�ire
Bailey, Harring & Peterson, P.C.
1660 L�ncoln 5treet, Suite 3�75
Det�ver, CO 80264
/ '
,
�l-•yr,�, ��2-� c''��
/ � �
, ' 17. Letter dated�.06.96 �rom A, Frick to R. T. Moorhe
ad, B. McLaurir�, A. Knudtsen,
and D. Spaneck
�8. Town of Vadl Actior� Form dateci Q3.fl7.96
19. Letter dated 03.07.96 from A. Kn�dtsen to J. Pet�rson with attached Action Form
20. Affidavit dated 03.07.96 with attached transmittaf le�#er from R.T. Moorhead to J.
Bailey
21. Letter dated 03.09.96 from L. Waodall to A. Knudtson wit� attached facsimile
transmittal
22. Leier dated 03.09.96 fram L. Woadall to H. McCutchean with attached facsimile
transmittal
23. Letter dated 03.11.96 fror� J. Dunn to J. Bailey with attached 1996 Resume of J.
Lamont
24. Letter dated 03.14.96 from A. Abplanalp to Va�l Town Cour�cil and PEC with
attached facsimile transmittal
25. �etter dated 03.15.96 from R. T. Moorf�ead to A. Abplanalp
26. Letter dated �3.22.96 from A. Ab�ianalp to R. T. Mflarhead
27. Mem�o dated 03.25.96 from R. T. Moorhead to A. Knudtsen
,
28. Memo dated 03.26.96 from A. Knudtsen ta R. T. Moorhead
29. Let�e� dated 03.27.96 frorn R.T. Moorhead to A. Abplanalp
�
�
�sa.v��sy.;..w.ic..in.�c��rv:w,.�e�u��
EAST VILL�E HO�r'IEOWI�ERS AS���IATION, INC.
Of,icers: Pre�dan! - R��C,ah•m Secretarv - Cretta Parks Treasiue* - Patrick(sra�;a
Dn-ecter� - ludith Berkowitz - �olph BridgeK•ater - Ell:e Caulkin_� - Ron Langley - Bill"vl��-tou - Cc+�nie Riduer
To: Desi�n R�view Board /1�����
J �Frc�m� Ju� La.�nr��rt, Exc�utive D�i��ector
%�� ,�.,���. ,;���--
Date: �pri13, 1�95 1� � ,/
J� � �cav-��
RE: �ppeal of StaffDecisi�n regard`ang certain aspects of+�it I�lternarianal Wii�g, a�osed. t�
The Hc�meowners�ssociation has vie��•ad the 1�wvo e�l�ibits used by the staff tc� r.nder their
decision rag:irdi�ig tha desi�n of porti����s of tha ruof top terra�a cantiguaus w�itll the dzcl�,ss of adja-
cent prc�perty owr�ers.
Their is i��sufficieitt infc�rm�tinn provici�ci in t1�e c�oci�inznts tci det�trnine, witi� accuraeti°,
tha implication of the dssign upan adjace4rt propert�,�ow�ers. Tha dncumznts are schematic ir na- ,
ture �nd da�lc�t cun#ain su$ic�eni detailing or dirtrem5ioning to firn�ly establish ralAtive haights und
distances of uliprovenients fron� adjacent proper�ies. Purt�iarcnore, the docurne�its do not clearly
1l�CIlI1CV L�1C �LfU(:IUT3�TCIil�IUR:i�llP �Ct��C;C(1 �]]�pI'U�USCLI it17(� GX1StS[l� 1I71�Tf()L��menls, such as thc
pr�apKrse�l struch�ra r��ith the e�isfiin�, builciing as its related to tha balccinie� of a.ctiacent pr�pert�•
owners. �dditionall��, �ere ar� inc�nsist�nc��heh��een the fivo drawin�s of elem�nts shoe��n, the
most naticeabl� b�ing th�roof form cc�verin�tha proposed e�evatoc shaft.
Given lhe �•ritieal importancc uf acc�unting for knc���;n dis;asices and heights that pr�yte�ct
sight lines, scre�ning�l�ments, as 4r�e11 as the azst�atic of sln�ctaral int;:rcotin�c±i�n betw��n gru-
posed and esistna�,buildul�, th�se conditions should ba spacificallY�(di�n��sionallS�}documented
in�z appror��l docur�iants. ��'ith the informtttion availa,4�le fur rzvie��-, th� FIvmzc�w-nars.�ssoci-
atic�n dc�s no�b�lieve th� prop�sal meets its r�quiramet,ts for a successfiit resoluti��� �f sight,
�und ana relatzd matters ass�ciated �vith tha proposed project,
'I�ae Hor�uza���n�rs�,ssociatiou r:.quzsts that this matter I�tabl�d until s�rch tirn�as sut�i-
ciant documentA.rion and �ocuments arz pro�•id�d by the upplicnnt. �
�
Post Office Bo�?38 \%ai9,Cclorado 91658
Telephane:1.97U)t32?-56FSC� MessagelFA�:(97Ui
� ! �
1 r/1
J rr / , ``
Z-[:
l • C�.� �
�} ;' � �
�
�� �
� /,� �c�
� �
.
Lodge at Vail International Wing
Appeal of Anita Saitz
Note: Circled and em hasized references on documents maY not be on
ori ina�s but are intende�d ta focus th� reviewer vn the areas���of
concern or interest.
''�
i •
Lodge a� Vail International Wing
Appeal af Anita Saltz
Note: Circl.ed and em hasized �efErences on documents ma not be on
ariqinals , but are �ntended to focus the reviewer on the areas of
concern oz interest .
' Exhibit 1 .
Design Review Board Ap�roval and letter ta Jay Peterson
Exhibit 2 .
Copy of parts af C7ctober 1994 pl�ns r�lated to elevator apQarently
approved by DRS, and capy of elevator specifications
Exhibit 3 .
Copies of part of �October 1994 plans related to building floor plan ,
apparently approved by DRB, identifying effect af el.evator
relvcation (resulting fram earlier planned violation of candominium
cornmon elements} incorporated into final approved plans
3 . 1 Penthouse level
3 . 2 s�cond accommodation unit l.evel
3 . 3 first accommodation �nit level
3 . 4 kitchen/International Room level
�xhibit 4 .
4 . 1 . Copy of part of 1993 plans relat�d to building elevation
submit�ed by developer
4 . 2 Copy of part of Octobez, 1995, plans relat�d to building
elevation initia�ly approved by Design Review Board, and
ider�tifying inconsistency with current design plan
Exhi.bit 5 .
5 . 1 Copy of part of October, 1995 , plans related to penthouse
floor plan apparently approved by 17RB
5 . 2 Copy of part of earlier pl�ns related to penthouse floor plan
Establishing different configuration of staircase and enclosure
Exhibit 6 .
Copy of part of October 1995 plans illustrating difference in
prvfile of stairwell structure which is permi�ted if stairway is
changed to original configuration
Exhibit 7 .
Minutes of Town Cauncil meeting of December 5, 1995
Exhibit $ .
Letter from Andy xnudt�en to Jay Peterson - DeCember 8, �995
�
• i
Exhibit 9 .
Flans related to proposed madzfication- dated Janua�y 5, 1996
Sheet A1 . 1- Roof Terrace Plan A
Sheet A1 . 3- Roof Terrace Plan A
Sheet A4 . 1- Terrace East Elevation/Section
Sheet A4 , 2- Terrace Elevation/Section
Sheet A4 . 3° Terrace Section/West Elevation
Sheet A4 . 4- T�rrace Section
Exhibit 10 .
Letter from And�r Knudtsen to Jay PetersQn - .�anuary 17 , 1996
Exhibit 11 .
Letter from Abplarialp to Andy Iinudtsen - February 7 , 1996
Exhihit 12 .
Letter from Andy Iinudtsen to Jay Peterson - �'ebruary 7 , 1995
Exhibit 13 .
Letter from Town Attorney ta Abplanalp - February 15, 1996
Exhibit 14 .
Letter fror� �Tay Peterson to Andy Knudtsen - February 15, 1996
Exhibit �5 .
Memorandum from Architect to Community Development - floor plans
and crass sections - Feb. 19 , 1996
Exhibit 16 . .
Sheet A1 . 1 dated 2/16J96- missing
Explanatinn by the Town Attorney - "The several iterations of a
desi.gn before one is submitted which is aceeptable to th,� Town and
the applicant are not saved ar maintained as part of the record as
they are no longer relevant and would c4mplicate the record. "
Letter to Abplanaip, Exhzbit 32 below.
Exhibit 17 .
Sheet A4 . 1 dated 2/16/96- missing
Explanation o� Tawn Attorney - "The several iterations of a d�sign
before one is submitted which is acceptablE to the Town and the
apglicant are not saved or maintained as part of the record as they
are no lonc�er rele�rant and wou�d complicate the zecord. " Letter to
A1�pYanalp, Exhibi� 32 belaw.
Exhibit 18 .
Sheet A4 . 2 dated 2/16/96- missing
Explan�tion of Town Attorney - "The several iterations of a des�ign
before one is submitted which is acceptable to the Town and the
applicant are not s�ved or mair�tained as part of the record as they
are no longer relevan� and would camplicate the record, " Letter to
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
� �
Exhi.bit 19 .
Sheet A4 . 3 dated 2/16/96- missing
Explana'tion of Tawn Attorney - "The several iterations of a des�gn
before one is submitted which is acceptable to the Town and the
appJ.icant are not saved o�' maintained as part of the record as they
are no longer relevant and would complicate the record, " Letter to
e�bplan�lp, Exhibit 32 below.
Exhibit 20 .
Sheet A4 . 4 dated 2/16/96� missing
Explanativn of Town At�orney - "The several iterations of a design
befare ane is submi,tted which is acceptable to the Town ar►d the
applicant are not saved or maintained as part of the record as they
are no longer relevant and would complicate the recard. " Letter ta
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
Exhibit 21 .
Memorandurn fr��n Archi�ect to Communi�y Developm�nt - flaor plans
and rooftop plante� section - Feb. 26 , 1996
Exhibit 22 .
Shee�. Al . l dated 2/16/96� missing
Explanation of Town At�.orney - "The several iterations of a design
before one is submitted which i.s acceptable to the Town and the
applicant are nat saved ar maintained as part of the record as they
are no longer relev�nt and would complicate the record. " Letter to
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
Exhibit 23 . .
Sheet A1 . 2 dated 2/16/96- missing
Expl�nation of Town Attorney - "The several iterations of a design
be£nre one is srabmitted which is a�cceptab�e to the Tawn and the
applicant are nat saved or maintained as part of the record as they
are no longer relevant and would complicate the record. " Let�er to
Abplanalp, Exhibi.t 32 below.
Exhibit 24 .
Memorandum from Arch�.tect to Community Development - transmitting
roof plan and roof/planter section - March 6 , 1996
Exhibit 25 .
Sheet A1 . 1 dated 3/6/96- Roof Plan
Exhibit 26 .
Sheet A1 . 2 da�ed 3/6/96- Roof Planter/Section
Exhibit 27 .
Staff decision approving modifications set forth on plans
Exhibit 28 .
Letter from Abplanalp to Town - March 14 , 1996 - appealing decision
� �
Exhibi.t 29 .
Letter from Abplanalp �o Town Attorney - March 19 , 1996
Exhibit 30 .
Letter from Abplanalp to Town At�orney - March 22, 1996
Exhibit 31 .
Letter from Abplanalg to Tvwn Attorney - Maz�h 25, 1996
Exhibit 32 .
Letter from Town Attorney to Abplanalg - March 27, 1996
,
� �
I
,�
I
.
Exhibit 1 .
Design Review Board Approval and letter to Jay �eterson
i
� TOWN C3F VAIL �
�ategory �Jumber_. _� Date ��� -�- �.� •—
Pro�ect Name: ,�7 7�{��ir � r�.� •f,��>
Building Name: 1��r2 � ��' /
Project Description: � _ ��-r��.,.w c� ��� c�.�.�, 2 � �f-�C�l�'i ,►-x��e.4� r.�
v�.-.-L 1 ��'S
Owner, Address anc� Phone� �� ' �{-- �
�� '
Architect/Contact, Adaress and Phone: �.-c��
,�4--u� .��c��
Legal Description: Lat 61ock Subdivision Zone District L��..��
Project SEreet Address:���I� � ��� �.—f-�-z.�a�- �'f�.
Comments:
' _ _
c� �a n /
� �^ � � � L�
_ --�� /./ "� � y�" .
Board / S�affi Aetion
h�iot3on by: _�l�-��'�-'� Vot�: �� ,
Seconded by: �1
� -
�Approv�!
— (7i5_nDr:�i^I
= Stau ApC'DVa]
C�nditions:
�
Town Piannz�
C�:�� '� . � D�6 Fee ���-paio
�
� • ! -
. ��•►
. �
� �,�
�lE
,s
�o��v oF v�
75 South Frontage Road Deparrrnent of Communiry Developm�
Yail, Colorado &I657
970-�79-213$✓479-2139
FAX 97D-4?9-2452 �
November 7, 1995
Jay PetersQn, Esq. .
Va�Nativnal Bu�7din�
108 S. Frontage Road
VaiI, CO S 1657 .
RE: The�nterz�ational Wina at The Lodge at Vail
O�Novembes I, 1995, the DRB voted 5-d to approve the plans for the Intemational ��Ving.
Condztions of agproval are as follfl��s:
_ A. Prior to applicatian for a building permit, the applicant shall deriicate a public
access easement throu�h the corridor between the proposed Internabonal Wing
and Qne Vail Place.
B_ Prior to application for a buildin�perrnit, the applicant shall provide detailed
drawi,ngs to t�he Tou'n of Vail Fu-e Department which show that the existin�
improvements, as wel� as ihe propased construction, will be sprinkler�d.
C. Frior to applicatian for a b�uilciing pemut, app�cant shall provicie approval from tl�e
I3_S. Forest Sezvice for the use of U.S.F.S. land adjacent to the�nteinational Wing
- ga�io. If approval cannot be �ecured, the applicant shall return to thc DRB far
�pprowal af a modified design of the landscaping, site pl;anning and e�-ad'sng. DRB
e�courages the applicant to expa�d Lhe la�ndscaping in the area, if that i5 acceptable
to the Forest Service.
D. Tbe DRB-approved drawin�s indicate that alt impravements comply with the
Tou�n standa.rds for height and view corridors. However, verification of the
co��tr-uction documents must be provided at tirne of building pernzit. Prior to
ap�plication for a building perinit, the appli�ant shall provide doeumentatian to tl�e
Ccm�munity Development sta�t to verify that the proposeti stivcture daes not
eacroach intc� any established ar adopted view carridor. Docuznentation s�all
in�r3ude a surveyor's stamp of t�e elevatians and sections, 5pecifyi.ng the USGS
eIeuation of the proposed ro�f ridges, plate hei�hts, chisnney caps and view
1
_r.
i • �� �
� A��� � �� . � �h �
�... ' . 4, �p �V
carridor b�undaries. Tbe urban design sta.nda�s reQu�� a 6�/40 s� � � r 4'���^q h�,
� � �� ° � M
hc�ight also shall be verif ed• 5 � � q
i
_ �
, E. priar�o issuance of a buildin�perrnit, applicant s�all pay II r���{e���e �� �
ace for tfie arkin� demand ge Y ' .�,�:
amnumt of�8,594.40 per sp P �.
developrne�.t. 'I�e DRB-approved plans shaw a par�cing requirerzzent of 62.6 �, r,_
spaces, so the fes would�e $538,009.44. �'':�
F. prio�r to application for a building pernit, aPPlicant shall provide verification that '�;,_
' alf proposed ligb.ting complies with TOV standards•
(;. pr�c�r to application for a building permit, tbe apPllcant sball revise the Iandscape
Ji�htin�plan, replacing the proposed light�`Vil�a' ,p,�e�� ��illage Light," iar
order to b� consistent with the rest af th�Va �
�I. l�or to app]ication for a buiSding pernvt, t�e aPP�'��t s�all redesign the entry
statement into the courtyard fram the Founder's Plaza• TI�e applicant shall submit
a sketcb to staff, verifying that the entry statement�� bee� "c��'atica�ly reduced
in siz�."
I. III�j� f1]�11T�, tbe appiicant shall coaperate wit� the Ta'�.'�° of Vail, Vail Assaciates,
and surrounding property o��ers to deve�op a master plan for thc area to inte�ate
the International �in� with thc Village area and bas� of ski slopes.
Thank yau for your cooperation throughout tbe review of t�is project. Please �all me if you bave
any questic+ns about thesc conditions.
Sincercly,
��, l .
Andy �udtse�u
Senior Planner
�r
cc Cneg Christrnan
Susa.n Conac)ly
Jan Bran�t
Lvnn FritT]ez�
Jim Lamoat
:.;.�;
. --�;���
;�,, �
;�•
1.�,
. 2 , _ -.:L
,�;�. :
.�v�
.�v�
� �
.
Exhibit 2 .
Copy of parts af October 1494 plans related to elevator apparently
appraved by DRB, and copy of elevator specifications
�::-�
''��,..�'
�'?� � � � �
:�����: , � �
1 1�
. • i �
� � i
� � '
i
, �� � 1
f � � .
� �� �
}.
t, �
Y , 4 '
` t � ti�+�i� 1 M
�'� � �' � � *ti1;, 1
-��' \. ���r , s
�,
�`•�1
. ; ��y� �� 1
i �� r �t�1 � �
� � i w�
� ;,. 1 � ����
�.� � � F �Z��
1 ,�
• �� „�, �,l`7
�'' � �`�'�
,��� ,
_ `. 1,'��
: � s+� ,w`� � •
,. •�. ` � ''��;�a 1
.L � 1
�;i ,C `,�.�tti�'�:1.—r'�,�`';.:ti'�\.. . �1,�. �;�� , '7
'.1 ``� �. _ ...�-:� --:-, ,.,. ;i��
•�" �• �• :'��`�saC•,sw�,�1
� --� � ,_r.i i��t��
.'p � `, ��\
� S /!�liw���� K��� �
.r� ��jl.'�ir� +4.
�� �
;��
�,��
� � ��:
- --.+�^�- �►.
�
1 ��`4
. ��� � .
• --,.� h�; ��
��: �»�';
� .,�.,� •>>
1T�r� ��; :
► .:; �':•.� *�
. � _:,;��.�i�w''�:"�1t'�t�ti'�4�`���ti���
•,-
_�hlti.
��
'.' ��
.L�'�,'� ti
� �:��`,S� i �
�'ti\,: � 1 1
:4�:r
:y,�
.'1� �
�.�
+i'1Z'+'��':1._�`'���
1��±
. : .'\'i � y ��
. ��r 1 �`i 1 .
�' .�,�'.' �
v �
�•��,',,�T:�ti`����\\�\;�'�����.��, � !
.: ..k�...ti ti. w
�� �\ � •
�� Y .
� I� � � �
\ +�• � �
�� �. �
4� " ��-��`
� �.:;-�! I
�. ���•
*, }
�r ���`i
� ' � `��
� ��,
;ti. ����� .
.�,_ R I
`:' 'E+�l' M
�
� ���� .
� ��ti�
,
� �`�
`� ;��
�...
\` y�
1� �
\
�� .
y ,
� „ ;
�{ e ����' ��1'.� (i �t��.l,'?. .. _ _
i �>� , � � � �
�, �
` R � -�
- - --- � � u, �
, . , � � �� - � ��
��� "- � , t . .. � I � �� p F�
'r;! �.` ...,!.� � .a� �i f-� �
I � � _a 1' � � F� � .-
� i `� �- � _ � � �, v
! �1\. - - . .. I 11� �
I � ��� _ —_
• F - �r✓Cl l al 1 N3✓� 3"�I2�i �
.�� � �
--1 ._! f-
,� � � � 1 � � � dl`n � � �)
-1 � � � � �� �_
i � � � � u' � a
�� � 1 ry � ,� a �J �
a� � v
� {� �r �i - Q *�
'-li � n ui� ��� ���
U� � �
! I -�
. � �. __.. --- ----
. . ��_. --� --. - -___- _-P_ — �-- �- �-- -
r _i ! ��- -
. ; l � � � � �
� _ � � � �
� � � 1 �
� � `� � � M�lid zi�� H�l�d z���
� , - � � � t �
wG ;rl � -c -
J! �y { .- Y�� � __ � �
�. _ j� . �,�. ��
�
� � � �� J � '�m
. ; � � �
I , ���
1 ' � 4 � � 1 �/ �'�`? � �
:, _ �
� ; l� n `� � - � �� � - --� n
I . � ,' - ; `_
,`� . k . �\` � � �
� �' - 1� � sy `�
' ' � .. _ __! I � � � �
, , o . - --- --- �: - - j I ,
�
. � -{ � � � .
, . . _ _ ---- --- _. --� - -
, . ;' . � .�.4,:ti- - .--_I�^- _�,_ ___._ ... _. . _ ____ __.._ _�___
r I I _ . .. J
. �,
, . � .
� , ' , � � -�-- -._ _._.
, � -- --- _ . .- ---. _-- -_`.. __� �
. ,
�i
; ..�._.. _. _ � � � '�
� . -� I u' .
. I � � , o
i �' I � � i u� ���::--— - �� • .
. I ` � I � ' � ' �� _.
� ' -- ----_.__.._. _ _ _ _____ ____ �`�-_;�- --
i ; � 1�-----�------ — , .- �— � —
. ` Q _. .- -_-. . �_ __-'-=��-. -- - � � � � f �I �--_� --. .. _ _ . __.. _ ._.,_
: I I q�1� Ll'� I
! i I �.,, � �
� ;__ L _� _^ �. . .��-_-- __.
�
��� � .
�� 1�
U
l�
�
� �
�
_ _--- - �-=-- - - --- - � �
� ,
Th�'. l,U(IGIf IOWer �
� R�s�ur�nt !
,
, ,
`-- ._........_ .
;'
;- .
�
� . '.
I •
! Ct�{orrd Co�o_
1°4�v�rd
C ,
� , .
. I '
1�. � `� �
� I
�'
C
�
I _ . .
I �
I j =- . .
(to Ivr 11�atipLnt TM� I � — ,
� ���
I � � ' .
I 1b�q _. _
� lQartd�r7Lrtt '��',� � � �
� . PatSd . ; .
I .
� . � � ` ' � dadd�
DM ��
� I rl� ,
I -. -
' I - �..�- ^ : �--.
� .:,r. ,
,: � . .
.;:t, _ -�,���
� - _-�
: . ,\
L_ � •
. �.�. . . ,
�� ' ,� . _� .
� I . L' '�14_;� ' �
•
�
� ` .__ _.
I •— —~ .
��. . � r
i .:. 1 � �
ExIST1NG LODGE � 82�-�� ' , � � 8:
SOUTN SMNG ROOF �--= .
�7,� t��-�0� ; . � . � � .
j . . �o
❑ . � ,
;;:., �
�. . � . :
.,k- � . . . :
. •::�Y-i . '
� �� ,
� ;� Tt3 8199b6 � • --- .----
, . .
f : ❑ __ _
. � � � � �- ,
j--- , --� . — ��--__J�
� • - .
s �, i - � ' t .
. .���� . ���
6 �
� _ � � �� �`•.
+;�
" � � B
' eS't ��.
� Co ��,
� 4p��� �
var�a bI�
t ,�¢
l���Ll\���V}} t � �, '� p � ���
�,r"r,-et�?.. `� "?� n
��`�a'`� f�^� J "Y�
1 �s�9^ .^ f '���N�°'�.. S f", J' �
Th�Ot�s Eleya�or Co�pauy is the world s oldes�a�� la��cst m�nufac�arer o� � r �, . M�� �.
� u�r�ic�l ��a�s o��atio�s s���s.We have m�rc r�al—u�orid exp�ric�c��uildi�g, � +`��t��' s .����`;�. : : V� ��
�' � � � � I � �� d� k�� �+£�"x'F,°,�d� t`t,�_,r�M�ir
�� � i�sta�lin�,ma���a�oi��and mader�lzi���I�va�or�and�s�ala�ors t��� an�� �����F�r : ��-���
�.�� � -� ����,� �
com any in��e worl�, �,�.; �,� �#t�:�}�� �
i � , , � �� �
,. ,
. , � �. a;:� � '�� f:
The b���fits af O�is experie�ce also ca�be s�e� in product,dcsl��,l� � 4-�L� � � ~=
, ��� � � ✓. � ���.
�ai�te�a�c�aad in the 1����1 a�c�s�o��r sertiric��ha�u�e p�av�dc��ou �an�o�nl o� , ��� w�� ,.��; ,
5".
Qtis[or fas�,tro�bl�—�ree i�stallati�os� l�Ur experie�ce ca� also save��o��imc a�d , � ` , °�
mo��y w��� �uu h�ve a �i�h�huildin��o�pl��io� da��to ���t. "��� ' ��� ��' ��� '���� �
� ,,� i _ ��� � ��
� a , :4�, � ,: ^ :
�,s"? r �,aa b'�z?'�
h q '�
' p� '•�, { � j�.�,� ..
TABLE OF CONTENTS '�'�'
;r� � �,:
2 r � �''
Introduction :F - - �� h, � �.•' �
� Y. �• .. 4.r: '2. �
Hydraulic Elevators 4 � `• � . ;
6 '�`
�levonic°Control -
Geared �levators 6 - �,�,'
Geaeless Elevators e `� �. .` f :�,•-�
Cab Enteriors �� - -
Fixtures �7 ' _
Entrances �2 ' �
Residential Elevatars �3 �� �� ���
Freight Elevators 14 � '''
Haspital �levators 15 t� � � -e }•
i�
I tors _ 16 '` �
- Esca a , _,� �J�
.,. .�
. .. � . . �-�t:''�..k
....1.�• _:�f ,
�C
�� f
,�� .
.
_ . .
e -s
� .
f ..
II� I �
.
17 _.
- n
_
Modernizat�o ���.
I .. _ a,
Maintena�ce j$ �<� � � - �
1 � _
�`
Otis Offices 2fl *�'��'"' �,�� > � # �� _
��" � _ t "�.
�r �
� ��� , ,�,r'='
? ,,'����;:
`'�
,, ::'
� . _._.__ _.. • �, ,.. .:.:;, . , —.�,�G^,`-�'"'°'a,.�"'� p�
�?
� ��
� ��,
; , ?"'� ,
�� t'�
� ''� , x ``" �;L,
ia .�. .. f � ..
t
(�� . � SS YJ +"✓µ�Y 14� y s2r�+C
� ._ £._ G� Z ..� 4�:. . � . .
I �
I` �� '`Y��e.�a, { � , x, iI IIYI ,I I I �X'-��� ; � ��, i
I. .�X' r.�,� �SY,�� 4^ r �I w.:a�^ ''��*�� e�,
: � �+Y�F v., n
.,7 �i .�., rhr -
'{
�'
a�
��
� �a-f,.°,'�,
,� � r��-s .�^" �f �.t;��.,.s, — -
� s��: '�.a� = "'
i +y�,a�
� � ur�` ''r`J�KirF�A�
�'s. � .„ •..
.�i� �� . . �•Y
Ii Otis Test 7ower, �►�sto
y Otis Quality Center, Sristol, Conneciicut t- '^'
:,
# >;;�.
� 2
1420010T1
��� � � �
��: ��vL��° �����,
I
i
.r� i�m f
1 ` ����'4����
�_� �CC�
�e��.�:.:,�y. G�aF����
'�.:'� GEc.REG'
.�..
•_:»�_, .� RAU C
C���,`smaoth reli- � � � ,�',.�HiNE t.,r,GH�NE
t15 r��ar � �
C�'EaHC�D ���
�. g`G�tical.a ; �, A��s —
�Finsst in the ; , `: i.J ' I
M{fOClt 1� Ci �.a ! R0�=5 C��aF f
. �Ie Wlti 1 JP'I.IING CLEAP + OVFAME.4D
re stale- � e�� � �„�AHEAC � :
fS��f88tu ca� � -c� � ;
i
_l-��,_ G I ��' I
'" res�a�d � ; c�.�ha
CtEpfl 1 � OPENiNG , 'i
i .O'ENiNS i � ���� � 50°
�� �'� � GAB �F��DOF
S gre the cAe ';� � ro�
� 'f?J FLOOR ,'
�
a �o r;_ow-rise ,,�w�s�� I I 1
�: etiver a,SE ;
.'�, � � 1 i RiSE
'�;qvieter ` A�se `
�;�Otis hos- � 1
i
��n.....�00� �'r.�;•�'�'.NE . .!� EIJTRANCE � E�JTRANCE I
�',D�e1 I ENTRANCE � 1
� 1 aoTTOis �ao-;�o� �
BOTIOV��_� BUFPEP � F�OGR @UfFE�+ F400a �
��H�- � �� 1 F���F: `V I PIT DEPiH � PIT DEPTH
F��OF.�Tr4 ��_
VBfl r��_�L_ '��—��— � I
,�:�.
crur�oea�' plan Elevations
hr � ,
.��;' .
E�S+�� � �
�S0
118.��t}'. R=%'F i�aE�,:�'.�; i I
.�� i � ��� �I
QQ �� � ; �;� � i
��lt � p � � pfP,i � i I
-bTTI � � I� GP.E ' � � x I � ,
4i
C� � � ��l;�.j•�. , i'
se — ti ' i I
�„�_�-
�--S`�'�—� -*—''., ' , ,�
FR�f'J��1F��dildG •'�.
EROf�IT O°ENIrJG ��
;` P1an View� `r � _
� '� i
s� i '.'�`
_
$IONS p�t aear
D��� S�y Rise p�erhead
- g� D max.)
:��� (depth} (depth} (wldth} l
�.
1� �-. �,-0... }Z'_3"
a1'-0" �2,3..
`25; _ 9'-8„ �q�-B 1/4' �-5� 51'-0" q�_p...
_ 7'.g^ q��•• 12'-3"
"25:`: 9'-8" 48'-10` i2'3°
iG'�81l4' �'•5' Q �.,.
- _ 7'•5- 4g-2" 12,3.
25' 9'-8' 47'-�` q.e....
� _ 10'-B 11A' 7�-5.
I
30Q'-0" 5�_2,.
t 5,.�. I
g �• 1"J-8114' 7'-10• c G 15_�• �
3Q0'-0�
a_;• �p'-t Si4` 8�'2' S�_�• 15'-3" .
3�,-0�
„ ,jrV;. t1'-9114` 7�•�'�� �._�., t�-�� �
10,.3. 3�.�..
-. ;��., g�• 1�'-d 114" g-2 160'-0" S_2,. �5�.3. i ,
'��' 1D'-3" 1'V'-31/4` 8-2" t
� 3. ,
a .
y'�..'. .. 7��. }]'('j.
� ��_ lo,-B��L. �,.10' 30D�`�� ,,.c, ��.(1.
9�'8� 3fYJ'-�"
g.�• 10'-'i 1(4" $�_2.. 3D�1 7' 7'-0" i7-0'
- }p�_3� 11'-3114` 7'�� �,�. 17_p•
���-, 9,�, t0'-e�!a" 8'-2` �-0
;�.r',,` `+4s
� .
,...
- ,er needs consult your Ot�s representative• �5
�
x,:
��rn �
�` �,
a2oo;aTs
� ine 1035 !
f
'T r• �'a• - � - ���g
� I �.o. ��� i � .�,a;
��E�4 oo�u , ..
oveaNEno � '� � E.,f`r�'$'�
y ! � LIGHTJ� r�Ena
I SwITCH � rnerHEnD
5'6' � I
CLfxR �
p�Npn'G . E MACHINE R001'�1 C�Ena i �
�G' 7'D'MIN OPENING i `•
__ ; ?—TOp � CLEAR HEADAOOM 7.0- ` v
��FlOOR �� � i
� � � � � ,
I
cne t f t,�r� �
/—I -i� " � <'� n
�� 0 i `x"ai�y�.�,�::
� a ; � a�o+:;
���
�I Ca6 I �, ;'�F �
R
�,,.. � Sw � i �
= RiSE R�.$E �
- PLAN VIEW
PISTON
MAGMINE
_ EMTqAN�€ ,
- Pli
I
!_90rtpr.i
l °�OOR
�'.^'��;•50TTON.
F_00.�
`� oi
YLINDEfl
_ '
,a,.
—
- ELEYATION
Holeless and
�
��'- Semi-Fioleless
� �
ATOR DIM�NSIONS (HOL�D) ` , r
f
_ �
Chy Speed D SW Alse Pit Clear Stops i
(fpm) (depth) �single wldth) (max.) Overhead {max.) I�
" ��
725 5'-9' 7'-4' 41'-0' 4'-0' 12'-3' 5 i ,
" ;25 5'-9' 8'-4' 41'-0' d'-0' 12'-3' S i
r 725 6'-3' B'-4' 41'-0' 4'-0" 12'•3` 5
t�� 725 6"-1S' B'-4" 41'-0' 4'-0' t2'-3" 5 I
725150 5'-9` 7'-ti' 60'-0' 4'•0' i2'-3" 7
`<- 72515D 5'-9' 7'-a• 60'-�' 4'-0' 12'-3" 7
72515D 5'-9' 8'-4' S7'-1' 4'-0' 12'-3' 7
125150 6'-3' B'-d' 55'•lQ' 4'•0' 12'-3' 7 �
. �56''s�_. 6'-�T' B'-4' 53'•5' 4'-0' 12'-3' 7
- 10�125150 5'-9' 6'-B' 60'.0' q'.p' ��'-3` 7
� 79D 125 i50 5'-9' 7'-�" 60'-0' 4'•D' 12'-3' 7
10�125 t50 5'-9' B"-c• 5S'-p' 4'-0' 12'-3' 7
100125150 6'-3' 8'-�' 55'•5' 4'-�" 12'-3" 7 �
� 1DD 125 i50 6'-11' B'•4' 52'-9" 4'-0' 12'-3" � '
' 100125 i50 8'-11' 4'-a" 47'-5' A'-�" 12'-3" 7 �
I '
I
E)R EIIM�NSIONS (HOL�LESS AND SEMI-HOLELESS) j
'Sp�ed D SW RiSe" PiY"' r Stops f
�tPm) (depth) (single wldth) (max.} Overhead {max.) � i ,
��F. I
'740 g�_g• �_q• Zq'.p" 4'-0' 12'-4` 3
�00 5'.g• ��.q• 24'-0' 4•0" 12�'4� 3
;;
ii
� �-9' 7'-4' 15'-�" -0 �.� 12.'4� 2
(101 5'-9' 7'•4' 15'-0' 4'•0" 12'-�" 2 i
�«�' . 5'-9' 8'-4' 15'•0" 4'•0" 12'-4'� 2
cities relYect Canadian code requiremer�ts.
,�equired.Consult your Otis represenlative.
85e in rise over 13'•7'to a maximum pit depth o�5'-5'lor the ma�cimum rise ot�5'-Q"excepi starting pit depth br
�.rises behveen 15'-p"and 24'-0'{Model dutbes only)the pit depth is 5•5'wilh two cylinder holes.
8�-0` ca6 with front openings. For other needs eonsult your[ltis representative.
5 i
,
�
� �
� �
.
Exhibit 3 .
Copies of part of October 1994 plans re�ated to buzlding floor plan
appar�ntly appraved by DRB, identifying effect of elevator
relocation (resulting from eariier planned vialation of condominium
common elemen'ts ) incorparateci into final approved plans
3 . 1 Penthouse Ievel
3 . 2 second accommodation unit l�vel
3 . 3 first accommodatian unit level
3 .4 kitchen/Tnternational Room ].eve�
%4• 't� '��r '? . . . • . .. , r . � �, - ..
� , � '
' . � � .
� � . . . _. - . .. . . _ . . .. . .
i ,
� ° •- - - ---•—-- ._— _.i .. _ - �_. _ - --. •— _._ .
` � ...DEGK 6ELOW ' � � ; DECJC d�LOW • 1
I ` - �'-_
i �'J
� ` ' ' ��. ___._.. - " : - - _ D E CK 'D��
I � c�� �
� � I ,� i I
� �
I � � �
� I D E GC BE L G�LL1 � �
I 4 ,
j � :1? ��'_,
� ' ' -� I ' � 4
� • II '
� �_
, I I i
� ;
6 -� �-- .�.-_ ' '
; ,
--— — — -' L
� � _ •---- " � �
• ----- ' i � 1
I _ ._._" _ � � �`y �.
� � � - - � �
. � . ��
� :12 '` � �
I �
� t
- ` -
. _ `�
�
I I DE� ��p� � 4:1? PITGN
� � i �
� i� i
I l,!
I ` .
�
i �`�
�� � i
--------� - � I
i !i v�•� �
� . � ' J�
� _____ � ..� �
� — ._ �
. . ��r�- �
�
; . � T
;
� D E G�C 8E l
�
I
I � �I
�,_ ; 3
------_-� �__-
�.«.. �.� ��, .
�' �
� �. �
� � �!
- . _. .l,f
-._�:: _
i ? STAfR
� _ � '
°'<< �
y�r
j :.:,. � . . . -
� ;����` � JLtNIDR � � C7E!
SU1�E � � ICI
0 � `� � � �
_ � _ . .
� . � C
,,
C� '" �
r-i �
I ! •
'. I I ,�_"'��1'
\ � J ' �--> I , • �
� ''`' , `�'^
s.'' . L
��
I -----_= �� O G� � . C
_ ,�, �s
.: ` �, .
�,�, y` � i -
•� �� �
i_: ��
� �
��
` � � \ I �
�_ �
i:; , .
� � , '
I '
� �!� 8�- • - . . '
! I I . � -
i
. � . �. L
� � ��� . � ��
�
.� - � i �
� � � �
_ ,� �
��
. � � I
� ` �� �
� �
� �
. � � �
�
.. . ; � : �
, �
. - _��._.�__� ,/j
� „ �,
°� ll '-d'. ' �� _�, �
-�-� � -�-'S
Y
. i. �.,
; � \�
. �' ST�.�R
� . � DEl
. I U��1 ER�NCE 1 ' F 1C1
�� [�
� Exletang � �'�i
� � ��
' i S�r v I c.�s i � .
j � I '
� I � c:.
, ' �� �� �1
�
,3
1��'—d"�
',
g i�,� ,
I � � �
� � �T C�R,G�.� ,-
� �a�
I '
i
I . � ,� E�
� /: �t ♦
STOR�.sE ��
I � � �i �
` \' II
Q
{ � - -
. . .t.
. . -OhE BR �
� SUfTE KC
�� � I
� /
�. � :` � � �
.
_ � �
�ERENGF F4�'ER
(�ormgr Go lden
Ski Rca om)
�
�� c' ��:'1 - 'v� :` � ��r,
r �b, ---- -.. '�—`_--- ----- - -'
� I
!� , I � I
' �---
�
---L�r--- .
� i
� I �
�-i i
�
I
I �
� 1r.�T.r.F-fE�h
I P I___J:�._1 �
E i , �
, ` I .
� I
j �- — ,
r�..�-�� -
1� 6�E fr✓�GE
� � YES�lQL'_E
1��.'- " g � i
� . -
.. _. .___ J Q �
. ..
ELEv. �
�1"tE�C�i-L .
�_i_it._J �
O 0 �.����,
C��'E I�Erk�E
�'i A
�
� ❑
fiING � "
iE- ��
���
!► i
.
Exhibit 4 .
4 . 1 . Copy af part of 1993 plans related ta building elevation
submitt�d by developer
4 .2 Copy of part of October, 1995 , plans related to building
elevation initially approved by Design Review Board
•�~ .�� , •:'�'��9Y�• � . \ �� ! ' a �
'� ���I.�� 7f�e�• � . . � , '' � .. �M
y � ��ily.•i.�� �ii i�. �pi t. . .: .� � 1 '�
+.�. N/ yr✓�i��i'�fr f�d� �'iy.^,�: � r o �^ ,:i7 � v..•
ii r'� � 1 �fi.�i�i��y �y �1 7�!�{'f. t RI < '�v a ��F
•r�1���•�� �5'ri� M�Gt'Fb'qi� t � . �17'�' � . ;��`�i••
I • •, �l "� �.
��V` � ���. •i ` r: :::Ly ^•�,� �...
.:�1 x — 3
` .
��• �4.. .y �.�.^:l.i;:':w, �����`~r•• �Y
/,�a,� �}:'�� �.�� � , y�l±.''�*�v�''"�"��°�,p� � 'o�a. � w��
.�.FM1 �, !`f`+$.'+i�"wn� � ��'Ni�r •.d9i ,���^I�AIi�'�',� °• ��! jw`�a� +y���
t.S. •�.;•�� •.5.:. w. y f{ , I �. •�, TM' ,,:`
��1t:� SIf � SF �n���f ��q�4�• �• , �-i."
•••il�� b 1'ry�, 5���1 �I� '� � �I ���(1 �i� � � r�.1 ..
'f� K� /:. j� ! i?i'� i� .. y1 1!'�� Y'� �:.. �
:'�'\i^�a�.����y�i. � R�'%i�1� '6.1�r ' � � /"1� i� r.i���M�a� a3 t � � y �ynrp`�'^ ✓,.
�: ' . .. . �''�' '` .ti�IL�`�'�`�� 'u���M'�+°4„1'i��t��w.< ' �'s ,�' �� • � t
�` `
��•� �Lw�~` '��t �� ��''�r'�~�' �Fl�}i ,'f��e�4� �����Ft�.•� : r ^1`� ���L • • J.
4�' � ��� .a ♦ �� ' .��� R`�� � ��..�( {4r ��' /'��• kt�,... y.�,• jt�
y,, � � � , I ,y`... ^,�� {,
YVr �'� I j � 'F T��.:t •� ���:•�M..� J� 4 i i��i� ��%}t � �{ �~ �Q ��.�
•4 . • �t � � �► 1� �7w ` A�! � -i' �,� a._r . .�+/�
�14 S J{� r a'ii��,, i�'��► ••�+` ���6.���.�f7`� �:.�5 dl_t��'!S�K 74 , e . i�� ���"'��'���...
•i' _ ,.",•=cr,.��'.•• "q�':•►Y. � 1 . •^ +�l;i'S".��i.�7`: 3�� ��:, i*1
�w'�j .I • :a a �,�4i , , S'. .r 3
�'j� �'if:�.��6•r �1 .• In �� .+`:�Ia�j�S!' +��` � � Y,+Y�^!. ` �.
:�. fl'�i•.IA�i .���y., I �". � '�i,nj.'4 �+� �� � ��!!�- +a:w.. �� •
�..1P�' r,'. +�4•7,\t�� ♦ •''. �`t: .� iw,j�y �F�. �'+0.^��' . � ���.
1�.�+•>•� �'J�li�'����Z��+4� `,,{�f:�i�� .7r,�y�'�w. ., ��,{1�� �`` . �. J�
I.' � �aa'" y�.Y � ���• 7'i r.. ��w,,,�� �f - .
�Ct�kti�; �C�+'+.�� ..a .'�.r .,.« � �� .. —�-(;.a.��4: �' •.�! �1/{� � ' 4 ii�,'�,,.
� � . v! ��A �raS'�.rr. w �Kl r� _ 'fw� �.�""� r • ��l\�V:�Yy'��Ip�f••.�r i .aa�` . f,.�
�
�.. y��t.��v � .... `.�..:���r.�.��Yw�/�' tl�l� r
� =i"'wW"• �,,• �i`'-+.��Iw� 1��!!. A ^ J,3,r I I I ..
+.
� + � 0 N�1�� � ���` 'II I .��
tl�� �w•���41�T��� 6 �� �.��'y�Y� �'C", t� *� z f�Z�r��
•�w ♦ : '�r� 1� � 14� �� Y'� �
•° ' �y.T i � t t� ��F/ii 1♦ �r� � � ��r 4 W.'{• j��� �1��t � .
�q ♦ .� �?NJ�l•W A I 1'• �(� i I Y
: :�i 1 O � R'�}�; , �� � � �I ��.
�� �7�' yK��� �' A a�n �n�a w�����(�����M � � � R� � ��� �� � .
/���. 4.�Yw .�J��� 3K� ��iil{YfOMQ1 '_ f�7�� t4.:v� ��! ' � 'I i I � tY� '7,.'r��
�Y�Aw�►�i�� ' � � �q� '�j �a� :� � .ir .���I I � «.�� _�'��
.1:��i� `�. ,1 e �. �� � I
'•�.�Mi�=,'tu�:'�rY.���..1.• �F � ✓�',�� �?+4�c�'.7S�'�IR,, �,tµ ,�'�'� � .::t:�i. �`�..
���' t':� �f �'.'S • � -
. .." +. �JI' tS413. : 'L':I' ` � ry -.. '.
�'k 1 �.� kS�i
'��:�,.�� � i��: :'i�J� .� ��. }�i.�, 3:; • � .�
�� �i.'i ��� y� �~n� ) f
' Yw Y�� . .'f� I�r �1 tN� ��' I II •��J, �
va?f• v� L:...l�Si.: , •�,5�.. I� •.jg:a
p il,� � :,{ 'y�.�', q�Ce� �d� '>�-..+• ���,<.� �'•�'�. w, _
{ � a ...t�r.w. 'r �" t•.}�.
`
• a9' �rC�.•'�� :• ij !�i: �C't � �Y'�• y • •+ r:
v. Q•, �. V �t'{�
�j �,�'• �^ '� i, '� I� �.
�Y,% /"�y� I�.�� ���Y�l '�`.• �xr�/i• ) 1 .�� y.' ��S��fr '71�.�N5�` �i �� !:
/�' �'� ���a.�.: .� ��VI�� .Z'� �i� •�, f+L'�V � �� y �'4'li'n^'� �1
'�`i ti'•: j°;.: � �r;.`.�" :: E,:,...a� � q�. ,�i'.�+'i'�'. ���,L •t� ! 'CL- 1
� ji �IM%i'a� �L�i. � .��: ��{� ���1 . . i1=` •�"-AT ��STS a�i` ..W1
•� ~� r t � � [_'�
g ♦. �ryC ' �♦y S� �1�1�� .d'. .,n "�' i
��S se�4 IM1���� -� N'.wY1 .r •11��8e- A.• �. �'' ' �, ��^ � �
•. 9 �i ,�r;:• ,.�w,_ `�. ��'a� � ��' ,a���„ � r;`�� I {
�' �� M�ry+ :� / �.r y� , T `��:� :i'
.,i � �. �_'`
%I. � �• �� 1 Ms'..r�. +J I
\ �i �„
�f;'�. 1.;�fi ���� ��� C`�E� •�:';`��,�, A�� �s..�. ..A.� •���,;. .
r+h� 1JJ' ,� /... ? + I r^ �.a1B��• P.�' ±� � �j '
, � •:� r� � , �..a �• ,• ; ��� N =_ �; '�.
y; ��i>,r .w ...e �• � E�vn'� ` �6,a�0�T�
'�•• �� w��%"X� ��i41 ��'• � s36��
,�a•'.y'•,�✓' •<� �.� +r; i.
� � ,a+i �� 'a' ,� � � ' `�G�6..��
..;s;Y �
� r
,;t�.;✓i>''r•:;}� ��'��� '�� - _'.'�ei:
:.?'i,♦ ♦ �:���� '
• .!:ti:�;•:?�'•:�' �� �+�.> _a '�� t1
.RT [ •'
�
� �,•���d�►�►'�17Y����i.i:n T �� �
fA�� �/� � � �� ���F.
�^��J�i.}��pR, �L .Ilfe,., � ` r+'� � ' " � �•. eppa' �� .��'�'' 1 �?�wu'�'� T"�'.r,�.�'� 7�
• {� •�"^,`��:J:r.; ��Y+'�.w� .� ti{J r� y�g� � �' , � ����,y.�ro �'.r,�.�.
'��, ��� �V:A'�' �.. �. �,�,•��!���1��� . �� 5 ' t•M7l�i�r��%I�'
. �, \ � .,L,- �,M:_„ . �..'MY'��� 'K 't �
e, ....� � � {� ' ���'y`� r �
l • � `1 , 1' �` � �,
.4�� ^: • '� •':'A�.. ,ai � •� �i r i y,= ;:'
� rr_ ���•.'r'F..a� �j '`yT��• �' ���'.'% � :i �!� '��:�i .7t ��^
� ':�� f��'?:�� si.:. � ; �;,;; ���: ,`. � , —�
�,y 5'�: I�i3�.:� f�� �9� C?..�... .�,,;�'�.�j!!� `.� ;�'� .,�f''��.
r.:h :�;; I.�.c� �.�•'���_, j ��i�'ry!: C .�,M1, ,1 ,��' i� '�
If/II �� �y��J, �:•� ...- �l �J ��"' i' �i� 1 � �
:ti� }�J y•w:�� � � ��p�� �� �� ,.:� � �ra.��r� �� . �
1 .ir �n. `g' .i'�.� . �,�.... .I��.Yi-5 r.,. a i.y,� � :, r �.:.:..: �
' � f'i 3T. .r7•. �. ._..�� i f t ••. . ' � Sw !
� � �Ti• '.� ' r• :. wi°�°siw�� R�r�I .! /�J. i
MS.: 'ri li�l;"' e^.>� '•'x ` "�: i�`l�JRIRi01�► ' ' .j�'•, ; y.�, '.•
{2� `'' =':� ' `— , ' :�. —� e� � •_� �� .' .
.,�; � ,� � .:� �:. �. �- �. �
� ..: �h3�� •'�Sr �—� E , R
; .,+rf • ^ � "�; ia�ew�. ,':':: •. • ,:�.:: _ '
t y .:.,o..oe 'F: w�•P,sl�! ». ' -
.. .3;� .�.Y? ;.,�+,: ,� e �:1 •^ y'r�
..... � Ib4B9.66.Q�ew� •e ��� ,�iiw,. :;�! -. � �.
'L..:Kf , +?si'�'': 1� �•�,il: : \ _i' • .;..
��'II'• � Y Y �'••' �� �'
•�,^'iL".�„�": Ji�9 IRdi'� �� ' , '';,ti�-,—,���� •. . .
� :,ti'; Ol�:.� � aNi�?�� ��^� Id-`�,'' ♦ ��.�,-.�.- .
. ��������r
:��J�� O7/R.EIZ1. i�w:��!4. •'�'i'1 � � 'S�'•'
���fr,����aM� �ij��'Qw 7~i ~'•i�'�� �.e��?•Ix~.� �'1 = �.� 1 `��
�� � y � � �- � �!+� � ��.p�
.:•f�i ��AI.�'+"��.���,��V,i���j.`� , ..._ ���R��ii w'•h.s� r w� *S�'+'�y,a•'
u�'r►C�1 � •;•' s�': � .�lO,.rai,F,.!�'�:,i�;;• . `�,'���',, \l -• '3°-
�\���.:JZ�� � �'�'� ..�'^��""R� ���1►:{�,• �� � !^K�i l� i:'��rl���
, 3; •.��' ym,o..v... v J .•�,.{, �t ,. :<;� +I:'
y?� y� � r..v �� �".� ��. • C �
Ya Yi. ti sf+.'.sw� ..i ,.,,'.��' .' � ,� �� ���i �� �'' � ti°"� , �� �.i���ii7`34
��: �a• '� �e. t{�/ �w .�. �ti r �7 :��, ;e iF 4.
t.Y1 r� % j�° ��� .... °_'I6 ;�/i� '?�'�4 .. � ,�� _ �1
{,, ' '�',,. � ��, . _� � fi i
, �������� � � �'�h -
. . `
. F
.�_ l.'J�. L �'" • _1 ^ � . ;� 'r -i �� [ +.
... , j. . �I, �; . ' iqy..� �.� ,j` " .. . '�S MM' J.fi,,y°�
J, 1
{ t,.. � 1{� i I � . . � .�'�jy.�` � � , � � • y �"� r�y1�y!��.;(
- F. h.�,- ��. . .•��rl�� �;�iWr'{ 7i�"," t • � t K• �ri "�?t�
!t ." t C - I 3.�� ,��� � ' ' �` � � � � �,. 5 f�"+�/
_ � 1 . _ . � ;. 'yy� . , i ,4' l`�`�
� � � r � �� ?rwl .Y�. \ �' Y S+.F
, �.
� t,- , � ' ' , � - . , .
.I �� .o.. ' - 1.'i . � :,.t � ..< �� � �r .,�
� �� �'- r .. i..� ; I i.. .T_L.��.,. . r f a' :i�. Z=
;.��� :fi.-� ,��[ . .. -,
`. T . L � ,� �T``w'5�.+�i,,� ,i l ' L'}�. y +' � "ii
rFy � . . .. ! � � a� � '�.y.}.'�rC�� r . �..�� t � . .� � FS
��' d � 1'
��� .� Y ' � ' . i� }. ' tti �� +1�1�± � v.7 yY '; 1: ' �.: l+� r 1 { ^ K t,, 'S�
. f � ' � t �1. , d+ 1
xS�l�_� �^iT'.'1 � '� .. . ;�`� r'+.y. . � Y �.`� c�� ' .� nrl. . �_� .�a�X�. q F.r i,'°�
�' � .1 •
a ['�4 .ti' r �; �r'' ,' i�� '�i!� �:` �"{,y f �* '��'� �� �'�' ,,3 � k` �
. , �:.. :. � �h
. a � r, �` 1+ � ,��
,� _{S , }'t � � 7� � w-' � � S, �k a ' i�.�yy�.[ r .�� ��
- . r 'r . .� . a-.-; - . ,� - r �ti �g��� .a� '� a. q; t = t � -�r , + 1 'c ,,y�J..
.�l� .-' y . '�p.�.L. � , a� �� ��(w � 'L R St�
[�� p 1�� t`�l. � _� �yV�. V' � . . � y�p .L:��•� ^3" `�h 1�$ ��:;''`� � t. '.�'._ .i:
�a . ' :+�•.s S 7• , ;t3 �� . � . ,:�.�� �'q '�'.'.��t � 1 •��7d� �,�i t: i.�''�� ,�~'t7 .��,
�!-� h
? �sr,+�%' ' ; , �� � , : a �� } ;r� �J; x. r'"
r� ,� � .:.,. -.� s t-�� � :;
.4 '` L .;� b• � ��..' I ;. . . . I�1 a ; f
ra 4,;t' . �1 . . - - t..Y }�7. � �y �; �
f ,� � ��� j�V � � �� � ` 41 F ,`�..
} s �� R':} � "�T
- � � ' .y;j .t Z' - + ;� s; ,�- 7�--,—i-���, ,�
� � � y ����_ �: �� �� f �' � '4 � .y '� ��� �y�'
� �:� � , /..�4 4 �� . . ' . ^ �,.� A�- 't , �.
�7 � � ° __.�.� , i � .�.��� x. ,y_ f--P r`•�.p -
�, t• .�_ y , '.�,..,7.:� ��. h1 ; = �'wr'"�' '` ;� '-f � �
: 1` � *'1 ��''� J;�. f Y - i �..17'.
a � � �� ` � .:� ` � ` + * �
r' I �� .,r :. .. . �. �`' 4 . 3� �. _ �„ tr � t` -� r :;r ;
: 1� �YZ F �� _...T .11. � . �.r/ . " . .� `'F Y ' 'yR �" : Y'. [. :Z _
. �. �r . . . ..
� A,-`�. ti,� -�_ �.'� � � -- � � ,� �s- �1,,,• ,�;,_�--�---r,�:
*j��R ` 't _. . "'"�..' �. - r . . . �, . 4 �, .i': ' , , ��. �.;� �, �* � �., , /
�' r°�;�;.�''TM � . '�,� ,� { S'� ,`�
�' a ,...- _ ;�:� - - _ '�b �.. ° � � 'cy�_ �_,_ u '� �
r.-_ �
..� ..+ . . ''1', . , y�4rf " . .• �� � �,,.`�
. ` � .
. �
. .-. . .. • �� . ,
t J�.... �t"_ . . � ..
' �� ` _'..y��' .. . .` _ .�'�""r`i��3 '^"�
�` , � .'y t -*
'� t . ',� y C
` - � j ��. . � ��y ���r
< , � I' �:Y � ` � �ii-r-�.
• �f . . �� �i=.,
.�: F �. . - �� .�
; � �� � - .. �
_ �� _ +��-� �v' � ��
' � i�- �, ��. � ' 1 " , ��"rR^^ - � 3 }M,,y . a- ..6!°'�'
k . r � }-, r�;`=
�.��P�.� -�-����1L � ,. i.� �.- f ' .� -� . ' ': �.�' •.�` � . .}� �� -
r� �"'x, f .,�'. - �,, �Y---� I �{�a
, b t; ; 4,� `"``�t��1 1'��--
'� � _ �� _�,__._,�.. �- . . - ; �� ,r' �t�, �
- Ty �r �� ,�. _, .� .,� ::� . , ' . . � n . . ..� �.
� �. - --- " .._-._..-� � .� • ' . . 'b . . . .
r � 'y � �
! ;; '�� �L �
� _ . ' �
,;, `Ic l.�}�. . .. F� v ? � .t
; _ � �.;�` � , `�,1' ___ s � �' . - : r � :;�
�S r.'!I1{I'_— �.��i�_ � . ' . _ �� �.''�'�-� � :���
� � '� s.;' I. -� 'y . . . . ) . '..�� I L-.
��. : � �1�_
ti:� _ .I '. .'! ' *...-»+-.�.�-� jl�"
� ,�f � �'i", �'�� ;�. � __,�{ �I �,
� �:,� ` __ .T }I!,; a . ' _ , r , J .��
. ��l ` 4 � t;�� ,�,. i ��1p-��
�. ��' . -,K . �C_ �� �tG=
�`�. ��I .� . � .ti, _ 7 I �1 x-
I � ,I: ��7_-� r' '��- . _.i�- -�#�t.—
� - �� �f{,,r
I � �II -1' +r .'�
'� � . . 5, �� :� _ ' ` � , ���
1, t ,�;�zti: `c � i >{r' t r'.
� ' 1. ? . � �
t � .d� .._ 'i�� . 1-� ' N_t jf�� �� T'�� '���� l#t�i.
. �� . � 'i\ �tif l• '��h•`{i
n a ,� y� i e�- r y k� .t
.. I� ^.� .) � .�.�b�� ' '� } 1 ` , 1
� ' } } K �
. �_ . , � r -r 1 �� �.
_ � ,r�� ��. ' `. � nl
,{� '~1 "„t ' � � 7. s�} � � - 'x�y
. � �. �. 2.�� • . � ' "i` fiy �<1y ., . .4 N o�r�..v,.^ Y ���✓J, ..`Fl .
, . � � . ,.'�i�' r"� ',^ 4' t,r +,..� t
, ' � =� .. ,� , �,, - � � ,. r - .�,�s
- � ���r < .� -r � ..-1. . , ' �� °} 1�'� � 4 � �';.rr a+� "' °��� .��ti r .
� ' ��r h �'�j ';,� ' � �. � M7�t'k '.w >�`' ..,�'��+ }.� y�, �a � _.r'M1d �L � -
.'{_ • . � '� w _
- jr ��fi Yi S.ti r� } � 3. ,iarr.�1•. �C �- �' ��t. ..
- . b *� ' r .. �' � � ' � �,L' .? ;�,.,, y .'.. y� .' +�,� a � .a, � ..y,:,_ �.., .
j . .. , ,� . �,�._ � � .. 1 � y i r :�
+- �,. . �� v�� � t `ti-� � .=.j�
. r �j i�� "�' :�' �,'�+�� �, � .� 35-��� ��v i 7 J r��, '.� ti �. .i `'K ' _+r' '�:.��+ � ���.
� y� �..' , ^�� �t (t i . y. .:1 w 4 h .:ryf r�� ., �r F' 7.f
� � ^�y �y F f � � ' `.4A.� � '�. � . rt �l.C"� � ` fyY V �'�' ,,b �"r�4 -+r � � �.�i"N. ,�
* . r , ac x � pt. , � � � '�,r � _'��,.0 ��,,y� ,�i- +<''�r � ..�.r �°/ � � "�r`y . J.
i Y �' ..•' x � Y.�� � i � �,'.�, 1 - l� l.. ��� 'S.1'tY 7��h-a� � . '�,y.♦ . �' �'�'�µ'��, :�3a r,��y r�� �Z^",,
.�.y' �5 r.-x y �,1J� � C�i.S%" 41 � �-.� �, � ., ,1� 1 ,ti��Y..�, �"'�+�i°n`4':rS��.r�h�^I'�Z"'1� .�'�"y �.k�'r`4 �n ,t
.�
,. ? � 6'��i, _ t A/ . , � ; �. . '_ �`���. �9�� S��k�,,'��''�•�..�'.+� r�r:_.,�,.,,._.��"" "eF. �'. �._.
. f� �L S ,t."�.�
� a 'Y �,.. / . : �`� ,�-,1 e� r,^ a�i' 1.M, �t ti(` S„�" �*�.u.
a z �6 p � � ����i�Js� 2��� �f��'�= � � 7
y, t � � i � ]� . r .c� b. • �� �^`�������� t � � � 4
, ��r '`�` jT.� d-k� :�"�?'4i� , _ � ._-`5 .�','� Y . .. ,.�.�f �t:;' _ `'� ,�''�n+•._"�"�, ....--,��5;��`.,�. �;^c��" ......�r.'1i�N. , c �.
�
� �
Exhibit 5 .
5 . 1 Copy of part of October, 1995, plans related to penthouse
floor pZan apparen�ly approved by DRB
5 . 2 Copy of part of earlier p],ans related to penthouse Floor pian
es�ablishing ditferent conf.iguration of staircase and enclosure
i �
. _.� _._..���. - T— .. _ I�f i� �r
. � / . � a �
� , i
\ i� 1
�� � �WJ �t -
�
. . � ' ' 1
�j �� �a f -
-J--b—J �
_ -Y-� $TdF�
�1 ��b -. �' , �
. , �
E ' TE RFc.4GE S�
i
� I
• �;
t .1
,',
. ��y
. � o oR �
�_ „�,�.,: �- ��� . : � - - . . - . . r.
_�
�, _ ,s. ��� :��;; . . . . . -
. ; ,
. , � . �„�R
- • . °JJ�'fE
. �.F'. c,.' .
' PL
. i
_" . �
,, � � . .
. . . .X�'' . '
.x�
�'V�""�^ .• " ' ' . . . •.
, . . � . .fC��
_ t'
. � �'� ' I.1� �i j : � I 1
• � i� . . � i . � i - .
' � � e � �— —_ . ' .
. / 0/9� �- ._ - . S 1
- J�
� � �l
DE�IlX�
,• KING
��C—� �
E
�,. � ! �� �� / E I� 1 � �
� � ; , �
� �
�� _
� O �
� �
r � �
or � �
_�
:�
I
�
� � I
�
- r.-�
T�RRAG� PR�MIER �
SuITE �eY � `�
L�. �
,NTER '3� �'���'�� , ��
�
�� J�
� � �
W / �
� � .
o � , � �;� :.
� � i� �
t'SASTER
��,r�� BEDRDOr
F
,,-
3Z
� �
Exhibit 6 .
Copy of part of Qc�ober 1995 plans illustrating difference in
p�ofile of stairwell st.ructure whieh is permitted if stairway is
changed to original configuration
. � � �
/
.
1!
1 � �
/ '
r, ��� � -
�•?��= 1 �
4 �� i
�
~ � .�I � �_� i �
l�" 'd i� '� �
�'� � ' --� -
� . � � �
� i
i
�r � t ���� i � �r y
�� �" .� ,
� �� � _ ,
, r � , �
, . � �
� � +► � ±B -
� �r - �
. � � � � _
� � �, r.� �• � �
� � '��a - � _
��m, �� �
� _ _
� _ _
� _ _
I
, ���g � - °
1 E � .
�
�
. .
�� � � '
� - I ,
,� � � ,
� �4 �I
1 i � �
� � i ` '
�
� 1 �
a �, , � I _ ' � i
�
"� ' 1
{ � I -+ y
��
� �I,� I �
� � !
� �� 4 _
J` � . .
:•�► � � • , ' .
. , �
...- .
. � . .
....��
� � f
� '
.� �' ,� ';
1�� �;�� -. _.
�� "r��
::r;;�:�:
� �
.
Exhibit 7 .
Minutes of Town Council meeting of December 5, 1995
vve�is, aa�acent praperty owner, that �tatutory procedur�� w�re not �r�l����� tc�, �np th�t
tl�e 19$3 agreement was 1 af. Architect, Lynn Fritzlen, state �propriate �rocedure
was foilawed and that rely�on a $3 planning approval was i�ropriate after 12
years. Peggy Osterfass asked what the fime line was for approval. Tam Moorhead
informed her that in 1983 there was no time line s�t forth on exteriar alteratio�s, but
since that date t�er� has been a two year time limit put into effect. Those opposed to
tF�e appro�al of the International Wing who gave input included: Attomey, Art Abplanalp,
representing owners af Unit #�27, Mr. & Mrs. Saltz, as well as three ather units. Mr.
Abplanalp presented a map which he said depicted the propased sight barriers af
certain private condominium owners and stated tnat Rick Rosen represented th�
Gabinas, also adjacer�t praper�y owners. Jim Lamont, representing the East Uillage
Hameowners Association, requested councii members take info consideration a new
opporfunity, and requested this pra}ect be with�Jrawn. Jay Peterson, represent�ng the '
appficant, Lodge properties, Inc. addressed concerns and answered questions. Mike
Arn�tt, Design Review Board Ghairman, was on hand to �nswer questions, as was Jack
Zehren, architect fc�r the project. Peggy moved to up�ald the DRB approval of the
pro�ec wat the st�pu ation t at additional staff-approved modifications be made to the
plan to improve sight and sound barriers on the building's west side. Kevin Fo�ey
seconded the motion. A vote was taken an� passed, 6-1, Mike ,�ewitt voting in
ositian.
ltem No. 8. On the agenda was the Town Manag�r's Report. Bob asked council
members to check their calendars in order to meet far a special work sessFOn on
Tuesday, February 13, and reminc�ed them of the Town of Vail's Christmas party at #he
Marriott on �riday night. ,
Mayor Armour informed those present of his concern regarding raising the speed limit
to 75 mph and asked that s�aff research the issue and any possible alternatives. Bob
Mc�aurin said he wauld discuss it wifh the �ew Police Chief.
C7ther tapics af discussion included: the shortage of bus drivers and overcrowding; tfi�e
need far a voice mai6 system for cauncil membcrs.
There being no furth�r b�si�ress, a motion was made by Paul Jahnstan to adjourn, with
a second from Kevrn Foley at approximately 11:10 P.M.
Respe ully submitted,
� ��
R �bert W. ArmoUr, Mayor
EST:
a(,Cc�/�'J�G��.l�rx�
Holly McCutcheon, Town C4erk
(Names of eertai�r andividuals who gave public input rnay be inaccurate)
3 R1��.1,�<..n�'ati�d'i�.w j P!l..1 1 1IL.d..S I��O��'!:�
• !
.
Exhibit 8 .
Letter from Andy Knudtsen to Jay Peterson - December 8, 1995
� / �
���C �, 3 ����
��
Tou�r oF v��L
75 Saurh Froruage Road Depart�nent of Cornmunrty Develapmenz
Yai1, C�lorado 81657
9 70-4 79-213 8r4 79-2 i 3 9.
F'AX 970-479-2452
December 8, 1995
Jay Peterson,Esq.
V+'estStar Bank Buildin�
108 S. Fronta�e Road 1�Jest
Vail, CO 8165�
RE: The Lodge Intemational Wing .
Deaz 1ay:
On De�er�uer 5, 1995,the ToLVn of Vail Toti��n Council considerupon appeal the Desi�n Re��ew�aard appr�val of
November 1, 199�. The To«m Council votcd 6-1 (Jewcrt op}�oscdl to uphold the DRB appro��ai wzth the conditi�n
that additional bufferine be addcd beri��ee� the terra�es adjacent ta l,'nits 527, 533 and 53� and the proposed
Pcnthouse Suite af thc Intcrnational 'l�'in uffer
to be reviewed and a proved b_y stsfi. thou�h we d� not plan ta 5c�ed�!.le this item for a Desi�n Re��e1u Bozrd
hearrng, sta wou i •e o ma•e t e propos�d drat��in�s a��ailable for p�blic re��ie„�in our offices at some datc in t'�c
future.
Please submit drati�ines showir.g the foll��vintr inforn�stion�
A. At If4"' Scale, sho«�all existine improven�ents. Delineate«�hat is a limited common element, a
gcnerat comme�l elemcnt, and whnt is under tF�e o«r�ership ofthe Lad�e Properties.
B. Shaw the proposed impre��e�nents at 1!4" scale in plan, scc'ion and ele��ztion. The sections should
inciude rbe full hei�ht of th� smac�:res on either side of the terrace area. This would include both
the prcaposed Pentk�ous� Suite�n�pr��•e3l�ent5, as����11 a5 t�e cxistina u.*�itS �?7, 53� and �35.
If it is heipful for you and your client,t�e Ton�n af Vail staff is�villin�ta reti�ietir conceptu�l proposals that would
aehieve t�e bufferin�needed in this ar�a. Once}rou ha`�e the exisrine conditions rnapped out, we�x�ould be happy to
sit dov,m and meet with you. I would like to ha�•e a final desi� availab�e for pubiic revie�v no later than January 2,
1996. Staff v�rill ma�e a decision on t�e a�plication approximately or,e tia�eek late:.
Thank you for your attcntion to this maner. Please cal] me ai Y79-21�8 if;vou would liti,:to �scuss this issue ir. a:�y
ereater detail.
Sincerely,
���(�I
u en
' - 1
Senior P er
cc: Sob McL.auri❑
Tom�vt�orhead
5usan CnnneUv
Pam 9nodmeyer
Jim Lamont
Jitn Brow•n
Lvno FriQJea
Grrg Cris�man
Jack Zehren
Art AkQlanalp
Ann Frick
Michael Arnett
Rick Rosen
�
�� c rr-�rr rn n.nrn
� �
.
Exhibit 9 .
Plans related to proposed modifications
Sheet A1 . 1- Roof Terrace Plan A
Sheet �,1 . 3- Roaf Terrace Plan A
Sheet A4 . 1- Terrace East Elevatian/Section
Sheet A4 . 2- Terrace Elevat�on/Section
Sheet A4 . 3- Terrece Secti.an/West Elevation
Sheet A4 . 4- Terrace Section
� �
�
�
�
�
u �
o a �
7 �f�
C) t-
t)' .O""�
VI� X
n• �, ,
�; - - �
�' w �
s � r� � �
� �.��'� L�- � / �- �
�
� �� � �
� '
�,
,
,�� � �.'Ny �
_�, _
_ ,
� �;: ,
{�� . - - - - , ,
� �; �
.�;, � ,
. a �, � ti
o ,
' �.
�� � �, � }x, - - -, �� � � �
��� �� �, �� �
� � � � � \\ � LL W��
� LY ,{� � � \\ \ �� ��
_,, / � „ \\
a
J)"� C'�
x r /� z
u, c �
\
• ,��€� - �
/ 3j t a � �
�� ��/ � � �
�� � � �
LLI
Q i � �
J �= C O
� � a
� � �] 4
• n � q
�
�� W �o
� o � ��:
GJ `�
�� � ���
� Zz � ��
� � �� � � � ��
{g ��O ��p � � _ � � ��
J y[`1 �C`1 � � yy
M r � � • ■�
���
�, � � d�
� •
��
�' _--= L
�.
�a -
�
� - _ _ �
_ � L� �
- -�.� m �'- ia�u _
-- -- - z�� �� r
-__ - __ _-- Q L�� n
— — z
__ _— p
- _ - .�
— - — �-
_ _ �
--- - c�
-- _- _ —J-�
— o�.
- a�
_ �
-- - o
_ - ,_
�f7
. Q �
- - - � � � � �
_ - _ - � lL
- - - }�� �
- - — Wcj � ••
C - - - _1
- - - - W � �2
- — W �s
_W
- — - � �_ 4�
-- __ _ ? u
— _ ,, �, w
_ — - � � �.
— - o �' �
- _ - - -- - mo u,
�
_ - - - — � o � W �'
- J
- G C �w
- � -- - - ;� � �� ���
_ _ _ _ _ _ �
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ �� �
- --- - — _ � -� _ � r � z �g
_- _ _ p `r °�' �� �x
_ —_ — _ — - _ z � � � �a
_ — � � � ��
_ _ _ _ _ � � ��
�
_ - - - N °� � �a
- - ��
- - - - �_�__ ..�,,�.
_.._ � — _ - �` �
�,� �� -�, _ �� � °► ,�
.
- ^-- .._ - � __��
_
___: �_ _ - .� .. _ -- -- -
_ -F_��"�-i ��� � . f -.�'--��
� �
_ ,.' . -. ,�_
� o - �
^ n
�..
�'
.�*
� - -
-- - - - - �
- - - ,�
- r� �
- - -- i �
--- - _ - i �
- i
- - ,�
-- - --- � .
- _ _ `
- - - �
, � `r
- -_ _ ♦ � i
♦ i
♦ i
- [1V
_ _ - 3 � �' ,
- - _- -_--_ - f , � � � �
- , ,
_ __ , ,
_ - - — , � �
_ , ,
- - - ,
_ - __ - _ _ �;, �
_ ,
- — ,
_ _ ' � � ��
, ,
- _ , , � ..�
u �
o �- ��
. a
— — — - � } �
_ _—_� _� _ � •-� t51 �a
q c >
. � � � n
-_ - - - - -- � � — . Ql� ui�
___-- _ - -- --_ - � �Q � W �Y
__ __ __ - - -- �_ l��l �'� � � ��
_ _ -- _ . i-
�
_ _ _ ' � Zz �,� ��
_ - _ � � S �� x
- - - � ��
_ � � � � ��
'� w ��
_ p � Q�
. — — } - � � �
_ _ _ — _ �y �
___ � 5 � � V
\ �
_ _ \ � •
__ - _ - _ - \ / �
� � V
r'+
� L -__�-_ - ..
_ - ry ,.a
-- � r� -----�—
� �
U1 L,, �, �
�,
�
�
� ^
�� �- �
� �i (�i,
�
� F �
��� a �u ��
�� t�;� �
� �� � °� - �
� - ° � �' �
� uJQ � �1u� �� .��.
� f O.
[K L�— IU
f r---i—i—rI—iI I�ll - z
� IIl J �
u �
�
� �
�
� 1 • �
L!_I�
W
�,
'� `� O
_ � � �n
. � �� °�'� `�►
g��� � a -�-
_ __ __-[-1-[-� �1i-1-i�—a �►-p � a � �: �
I Ll �l �l L1 1 1
_ - — — — � � '�
_ _ _ � � J � q
u � �
— � � �
U �$
w
— .i�i
� _ �`a
O
i0
—_ — � �
+� (n .�
— q C .!
� _ l
d � U
[� 61 a tn,
pl� w "� � 9
fln� � o �, � °u '
_ °- � �� � ���
_ _ � �►
_ _ �_
— -- - —_ � ��`� Z ? �� ��
- � °'�,'�' � . � � �� ��
�: � _ � �.
� � W � =�
__- �� �� o ° $x
_ � � � " � � �°
_ _ ��
-- � �
�
_ _- � �
� �
- . .-,.
� �
.�-,
z
�
�
I � �
_ 1�
� � �
I� c �
4 � �
C1 t:
IY ��
�
� � �
_� a
�a�
L
�
�
�
l4
�
�
IY1 . .
F
r
z
w
C
w
w �
� w
z
� �
a
u 3
� 7 -
� `" '�'
z
� e � � .
. � � � �
� �
�
� �
� G S
W
= m W �— °
J W � � /
� u �
c� � "' � -� m
� � 4 � �
w . d �
r �
�a
(.1 �L J.i213d021d lJfllNiWOONR� 3rJC]Ol �� � W O�
W v saG�z��da�+d ��ao Y � � ' u ;
`= ,�_
J
J o ��� �
� � g � ��
z � � �
� _ � ? �� _�
~ �
W � � � ��
,�,� o o ' � �z
� � � � ��
w�
�� � A
� � �
�� N z qo
;y��� t
J ..1
��� �; Gi --- ---- -
��� x x
W W �u
�
� �
.�,� .
�
- � ��
�
,�� x o a ° �Q
� W a ' -� d �,�
L
I � °��p�� ° � ��a
OI � � � o' �Y Q �O B11�
I I �� c�.J) n �° 1-
lll
�I .. _ !11 w �`� �1� `'�� � ' o Q;n 1!J �
(� I 'Vr � l/
,�, u�_« � �j�}i- � �p'b Q'� l_l ,��
\l� � I I tf.11l� G U ��`� 0 � / ^ � � �Y_.
U � 1 � � n'`'�Q p 0 d � � � �
n `� I 1 }L�-A � � � V._��j� - ' � fl
(I I • � � � {�1�n,ti �f } ._ ,� � � r 1-
l`) ik� � I 111 Q� 1 �`�������j�o i� F-- �> ll)
(� p' I � ��n ��'� � - ui
V� � �� r7 .t. O ��� ��-Jl
cv � �`� o ,� ' V t11
_d d I �rn/\ �o�7(�t�'+�}� ° rv�
h � � .1 `J``��CfG�+ `�}; i����, � ' � �1\ .
'� rv �
� i a �V G �����
� • � a
�� � � � � Q; . . f�
9 '.C�=' 1 s �a � ° � j� 1 � ��7
.q'�4��ir+ ~�a�` I�)c U444����p ��, C�_���z.a� ��y� ,"�'`��`G ;y,�o��"'!��4 ,
--,�_��•-yZ.� ��V� ��� . `�- ��,�V c �
- —•�-�=r'--c`' - D . J .� Q o
O Q 4� 4 J � p� �
_ T�'�� c�A� �- _� �� u `� z Z
�- :� r� �`d� � =-� ��� � ��o
� t,� , � � i � _ ���- '��n
� , . y
P , ` '��"��° ,Ii}, ,� ,��—> >n�,�
U . � tl� ' �!�n ,Fi_. V lll L U �
,�« � ��/)c ��� �I � " U'.�,% i4Q -C
� .
lt1�� � � w���
��,'' �•i.' ,���, �> U���,- �� i� 1�� �� �� ' � ��
'� � � , �`
U U�1 ��,r �� . �` � � > >I `i` `�,���I /� �i� �
,_ � ��„ ._ i+ �
a�ti ' �- �� �
� � � ,� , , �--�
f I �-�e i ''� .�J \ � �/ -; l/! �;, ��• ,� \ ,'`�
��m XO ` � , �, .� l�� �� �
� "'� � I W`�;` _ U �
��� I ' _� � I Qz
� k I -�� � ' � � , � � �-
�1 �y� '
�I ? � 1,�`� �i 1�,y\ �_ _1�i f/ � 1 L �} ���
C�I •�i% � I �'!Jj `�� �, `� w'✓ � N' J
� I O� '' �,
�Y" j � ��`"0 �`�� / :k �� � � �'k
in , ,
i'—— — � t�l�� _\ \�� �f%/ /,_. � � � d 7� Q �
� � ,�,� l�__-- 1
� � � �=?. �
� _� � � ,
� _ / ��� — �,.
� �
� � �
� ��, = �
--_„-�`��;�� ...� � } `��) � o � i�'._.y �� 9 �
v, 5•,� s ]'! `1 } � A�. �1�� .7� �1.`/� �,\�� �' � -z� i V l
7 !T`_� �v ,'�`,�//n����\,�df�� ������;I '�� - % � � (}../ �_ � w
� V���_� v G � � (! G � � / O
a ti� - � � � v _ o - =° < �'' � _ c
q q
c . - p � q �� � ? �
iu -' �]
� � q c
, lI� �� � � n 3 s
� � G . -� � �q �
� � �o� � � � � � ��
� Y�;
� Z � .� �
� J� '� �l ��� � �U 'c f1 ....� 'a O s
� , ��, ,a o�,� �� � �t � qW
;� U -��; ' � .a�..�`°'� .�{�p � � �F � n (K�
L ��J <[�f ai °��(��,�/} \�°d 0� ' u�
r�� V}..1 J)
\J {j� ���n � L� �� °� ��' �411
J1�,
l);;; : 1Y�,�.. .� 0 0 �� �
��� � ll � �:�,� -,� �. Z g
4!J • . �a ,�(}e ���` � �,� z � :$
l'y ;_, a� � ���` �a o_�� � lU �� W � ��
�`y � �� ```��� �= k�
�,..-S 7 G_ r 0 \ � II) � �M
1 �
a Q �. �
i �`� l =-,d-` �Q �!=- j � , z ��
?�`�"}` �:,a`��\i�� R��v J'� �Y `� W � �
� �
�` � e�`�� ' `�� �I� �� � N � �o
��0 �"' �.q �q
� 6 ~�
, �� ��� ..�� �d � ,
,,.�,_ �, � �°?
� �
� U :�
� �
r
Exhibit 10 .
Letter from Andy Knudtsen to Jay Peterson - ,7anuary 17 , 1996
Pos� .,- rdx i�c��e ,v, � .�1�� ,,�.�:.
� Fro;s+ �JYt'1 /,l,) c�.C�
�'
CO � CO'
,t Pn3f�e� Phane• u
! % �—c}1�
1�V 11 l T V�l'L7.L1J `i F3"y t�,��c— u%!a.} Fax�
75 Sourh Fro�uage Raad De,�artmenr o�'Communiy Devef.�pment
TjQi� Coloradn $1657
970-�79-Z13�4�9-2,139 �
FAX 97�-�75+-2�52
Jant:.ary �.7, 1996
Mr_Jay�eters4.^.
�kre�3�gi�T11C�12FICZ]Ti�
�08 S. Fxoz�rage Road'��est
Vail.CC3 $1657
Re. ���il Tou�Cowcil requir�zne^i ror buffering at t�e J[�temariomal��'ir�g .
De:xr Jay,
Afrer revicr��irig�Ix info��on sub*n�tted by your ar�,�itecrs regaYdsn.g the huffe�m�becc��een c3edcti on the L�.iru
�lopr c�frhe Intezr:a�ova.l��in�„stair i�as i�;4 f;.11�a^:ni Cozx�tnents:
ei^n
T�ie d;�tance�para�in;L�e decl:s is in.adequo`te at thzs time. St2ffbelie�es a bufFer of 22 fzz��S app:v;�riaie. Thi3
can bc accomp�ished�;��r.ai.utairii.�-��;h���sting d�cks in tizeir pz�sent ccu�fi�*��ion and reCucina the•vesEern er►d
Qf;l�e��hou�e deck. i:!e con�e�t �f a p�aLt�r�TM�°�»t�he decls sl�culd conti��:e to IAe used. F'lease�ro�.-ide�
s�ecific la�dsca}�e�3�i in tr°reti�is��ra�;'i:i�s indieatin�tl-,e szze and s�•'cies o?the p�ant rrz��erial. Ln�lud�
ap�roxL�nately five e,•er�en�e�s in r.he p�antCr crC2 ada2CeIit t0 L��p���=ou�e. �1so inc:lude a descri�tiQn of h��,��
t�e area�vi�li be maintai�ied?n the a`urure. 5ta:�zs asswr�ssag•�-indwL conzis s'atic�rs fer Lr.e e�:i;�ing eo;>do*niniums
w�ll nQt��e i�the reti^.sed c�-'a��in�s.
Proti�de�eta.ils ze��tin��te eaet�aior equipmzm, I u.�dess`tand no inec}z2a�ical equi�+ment is required to be]a;ated an
she r00f F�exrr'xpre,a!1�ent��c�n be acconr��i�ed v.•i�h duc[wo:�c vaat wi11 be�;3yli��ed�w�y:�i�n ait
Cor�c�mini��nS, P3ease veri:y'.
�'JwT��'f'S a ti2�
P'FIOi FD�t1IIA 2CI1dIl OIl L�'1� I°C�LIZSt�deSl�Il 3��fOt'd�.'f}1��O�'il IT2L:ST:�C�T'���2��JI�':al fir;n:he o�ner of uae.area
to be mod��ed,�hether t}us is an i.��d:�,��uai oq'��assc�eiation. Pr��:de T�h,e c�r.de�z�rut�n c3:.clai-atio�:r�1irh
ap�:t�niate seaions hi�e�ted.i:.�.icating wh�17c�t�he autLe�it��to r� '_ •a G�"�1 Ctrm.mor�Elem:rt. I.nclude a
l�er£�x�ti�is P�`�''-�-`���PPm''�i fQr a:+paopased R�ark. A.nott�r oa�on is,o tnot°e aIl proposed iir:�*at�er�erx�s
vucside ar�v ezistiz�a GCE �r LCE.
'�3�ank you�c�r yc�artenucn to 1�ese issues. Y���.�e inelw3ed the ccure�onclercti I 3�.ve zeceit-�l frnr3��erc�ste�
�artaes far yt�r inform2tian_ I loak ron���d to re�l-�7z��this in t�e t3e�future.
5' cerely,
���
Andy udtse�
S�c�Pianrzer
Enc.
u: Stsan r•oru�dly
7'am IV1oc�xhead •
3ob Mcl.gurr, '
F=e+-cry tv�c'sr.d;a.95,r ma•��ers�.L]7
�4�:�7'G:.SOPf3PE:9
#
i •
.
Exhibit 11 .
Letter from Abplanalg to Andy Knudtsen - �'ebruary 7 , 1996
LAW �OFFICES
DUN (v ,�BPLANALP & CHRISTENSt�, P.C .
♦GROFESS�ONAL CORPOF.�.Ti^eN
JOMN W, pUNN VAIL BANK BUIL�ING
'E�EP3�iOrtE:
ARTHUp A. ABPLANALP,JR. SUITE 30(J 1�70�676-Q300
ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN
DI�iVE L. HERhn.4N 148 SOUThi FRONTAGE RO:.0 WEST TELECOPrER:
R. C. STEPFIENSON VAIt, COLORADO B 1 657 � �S'��d76-C766
--`-.—.'.. Ki=cN M. DUNN
SPECIAL COUNSEL:
CEpTiF:_LEGnL ASSISTANT
JERFV W. HANNAN
7 February 1.996
Mr. Andy Knudtsen �
Town of Vail �
Department af Community Development �
Vail CO �
HAI�TD DELIVERED
Re: International Wing - Lodge at Vail
Dear Andy:
We understand that there is in process , somewherc wa.tr?n the
Tawn of Vail Department of Community De�;elopm�nt, consider���on of
possible modi�ications af a plan for reconstructian c� the
International Wing of the Lodge at Vail .
The plan which is now under cansideration may be compri=ed of
the two "floor plans" which were submitted to the Town on or about
the 5th of January, but which were not nade available for public
cirGUlation at that time . Those two p'��ns contemp�ated � roof ,
rather than terraces , be���reen the proposed penthause ard the
condominiums , and had no relationship to the plans approved �y the
Design Review Board and canditianally ap�roved by the Town Ccsncil .
Whether or not these two plans com�_ise the proposal w::_ch is
now under review, we unders�and from the de��eloper ' s attorne:�__ that
th.e plan now under consideration apgaren�ly is intended to �caress
the fact, which now seems to be un�.ve��ally accepted, th�� the
proposal approved by th� Design Revie-n Baard and conditi�nally
apgroved by the Town Council , with direc�ian to ir►crease a �•.:ffer,
viaJ,ated the common eleme*�ts of the Lc�ae Apartment Conc�c u�nium
AssaciatiQn. A new p1an, whate�rer tha` plan might be, app�_�nt�y
is intended �.o elimina�e that violation oi praperty rights .
The purpose of this let�er is to poi�:t out that any plar. which
is a modification of the plan approved �v the Desigra Review Board
and conditionally approve� by the To�;n Council has no- been
appraved by either. �he Design Review �^ard a�praved a p1�- with
terraces , k�ut which vialated the propertwr rights of the Condc�inium
Association and the condominium owners . The direction fr�� the
Town Council in early December was simp�y to incr�ase the �uffer
� �
be�ween the penthouse and the condominiums . If a plan has be�n
submi.tted which eliminates the �iolation of the limited com�r►on
elements , that is a new plan which has not been reviewed ar
approved by either the Design Review Eoard or the Town Council .
An such �an is ublic record, and we r� uest a co of that lan .
We should also point out a difficulty with con�orm�ty with the
1983 agreement which has recently corr�e to our attention, We
understand that the d�ve�oper is relying on the 1983 agreement with
th� Town of Vail which it asserts pe_mits constructa.on of the
proposed project . Documents which we have obtained, and which
accompany this letter, establish that the agreement was pr�mised •
upon repre�entations to the Town of Vail that the imprcvements
wo�ld not extend so far in heigh� av the lower level of �he
condominiums of the Lodge at Vail . This fact is established by the
memorandum from Mr, Peterson of the lEth of May, 1983 , and the
"three-dimensional layouts" referred to in the fina.I reference of
the first page of that memorandum. InteYvening gages between that
f�zst page and the layouts are not beinc supplied, in the interest
of brevit�r, but they should be available in the Town ' s files .
The layouts which accompan�ed the F�terson mernorandum clearly
establish tha� the "Area of Expansion" �id not extend �ven to the
top of the adjacent praperty owned by Lcage Properties , Inc . Only
two floor levels exist at the Lodge at V��.l between the top af the
International Wing and the botte�m of t~e condo�inium un�ts . The
Peterson plans establish tha� the Town was to�.d that dev�?apment
would occur only on the flooz lev�'_ immediately above the
International Room, and that the expans_on would include an].y ane
floor level . Ther�fore, even if t�e val��dity of the 1983 agreement
is not an �ssue (which it obv�ously :s ) , the pre�ise c� that
agreement, established b� this mater_al originating from the
developer ' s attarney, establishes that d�sign review approva�. above
thE �lnor level of the condominium unit= sho�l.d not have been and
should not now be permitted, Had the current app�ication been
consistent with the represen�ations made in 1983 , the projec� would
never have generated the opposition whi�h has occurred.
Finally, it must b2 observed that, �_th ��e acknowledge:�ent by
the deve�oper that the plan approved by �:�e Desie�n Review �o��d was
i�legal due to its appro�ria�ian and violata.on of' the common
elements owned by the Loace Apartmc�r� Condominium owne_s and
Associati.on, and the lapse of more t�an two years sinc� the
adoption of the ordinance requiring iss�_anee of a building permit
within two years of Planning and Enviror.�:ental Comsnission a�cproval
of a zedevelopment project , the develoF=r is now well outs_de the
time period permitted for developmer.� , without eve� a valid
submittal to the Des.igz� Review Board. ?� new or alternati:�e plan
can be cansidered only through a new F_C applicatiQn based upon
some new, non-intrusive design. PEC a��rovaJ. having lapse�, any
such new DRB appli�atic�n m�y not be val'dly considered .
� �
Your continued efforts and coopera�.ion in this matter a.z��
appreciated . _
- �'. �
Very trui'x ours %�
DUNN, ABF, ANAL� & , R . �NSEN, .C .
�
� ' 1
Arthur A. AbglanaY , Jr.
xc : Mr. and Mrs . Jack Saltz
_j .
� �
Mr•, r•� on ,� c� � uM
T0: Larry Eskwith
FROt•t: Jay K. Peterson
DATC : I�1ay 18 , 1983
� : Lodye aL V�i�. •
' I'aets
Prior to May 5 , 1970 , 4^lal �er J . Stalder, Jr. and
Rc�ss E. Davis owned �he property descri�ed c�n the attc�hed
l:xhiky�,t 11 ( °Total F't� rcel" } . The Total Parcel containC� 3 . 0423
acr�s . On �hlay 5 , 1970 , Stalder and Ds-�vis sUbrnitted a �ortion oF
kl�e '1'ol.a1� i�arcel to titie Calorado Cc�nclom�nium 11ct . Tl��s portion
i s clescril�ed or� tlie .��Lact�eci �xhihits F3 anc� C . 7"lie !tic_tli Wii�y
I'��oL��rty corl <<�i��ec] . �,184 �-�ci-es ( "North Wing I'arce� - L:•:hibit f� } ,
'1'}lc :'�utl� ��lll�� ['�rcCl is the ��i.r si����� �lescribed o n t;.� a t t��t��d
l?r.}li.l�it C ( "�c�utl� ��liny P�rce_ " } . 'I'he North Wing Parce: anc3 Souttz
Wine� l�arcel const�tute a s�ngle Iyarcel ownec� by ttze Lc:ye
11�azt���ents Conclominium OwnErs and F�ssoeiation (Lodge �:�artments
1'arcel} . .
�r�`/ �
On 1'c�Ur.u�� ry 19 , 1971 , tl�e r.em�-�.i.ning �ropezt: ('!`otal
lr,�rcel less �t�e Lo�lye Iluartments Purcel) w�s transfer__�,] tc� T ^-�••-
I'rop�rties , Ir�c . ( �xhibit D)
(7� .Tuly 1 , 1972 , Lodye Prc:perties , Ine . 3.ea_=�3 tc
South , Inc . , For a period o� 65 yea�s , �� �ortion of t;.= Tot
t'arce� f.ar ttie cons�ruction of �2 individuai clwelling �_;�its
7'liis {��rcel o � ].and is r3escribed on Cxliibit E ( "Lodge ��u�.h
1'ai-cel" ) . 7'Jie Lac3c�� Sc�utfi 1'Urcel c�ntainc�d . 3341 aez=_� . • � '�� �
nll oC ' the �bav� occurrea �ri.or to the effe�__ve
of the Town vf Vaii 7aning Ordin�ncG litniting density =� �5
��Er acr� . .
�t tlie �resent tinie Lodc�e Pro�er�ies , Inc. s__11 owns
2 . 08�3� acres of the Tnt�l F�arcel ( R�.:�airiinc� Total Parc__ ) . Loage
1'�o�erties , ��zc. construc�ed 52 accc�moaation un�ts w__:, a total -
c�t 37 , 3A7 syu�re f�et of GRF1{ on thE 2 . OQ89 �cres . .- ' I
. � .
I.c,dcJ� Iarc�f�erties , Inc . prc?oses to canstruc� ��p �.0 42 � �
.�cicJ� Lit.n�j ] �inils w� �liin t}lewr remaininc t;1�F�1 ,
�'�r y�r�ur c'c:�nvcniencQ, � h�:ve a �tached three-:_m�cnsional ��.
1��yo�;ts ;;1»wi��t; w1�r�L- ti-aris��iretl above . �:
_��'
� ,/\ ` 1'�� �. �, � � �
� 1 ��� �
. • � �
: ��
V � � �� ` ��
� 0 �
o � r --�• , � � ` . �
�
m � ti � '',� � l
� • r , � .
� . � kJ�
''�' , �`�� � � c�
�,� ��,' + .,. _. .._..__�' . . ...__... .�-, h
J � �
•r �
� . � y
��: �
a Z � � .
R �' � , �
r � � .
; .� -�, �
,—� ,��(, � ,�; �
� � � ��
,
� � , 1 �
� � �. ` `
��
.� . � . 1 , � `��� . � •
y-'�� � '�, � � � � .L��.
r . ,�
/ � i-+�ar-aa a.�r..
n ! ' ,1� �,, ����
� �
`� �
Y� m � . _� .��� � . .
.� � � , .
r � �� ��`� \� ����
v � .� . . . ;�,�rti �, �
ti � \ \'��
•M1``�
4 � I , � �. �� !
� j �'�� � ` '. f
� � � \ \\ � �� � � .
/ � ,ti�: � , �,
�. � f ����� � �`� �%. �
� - -- ,, .`�� . . : /
��� �, j .
� • � ���� �� r .
,�. �'\�,,` ,\� -
���� � � : �� � r-- _
, ,� .�. .
• v � R� �
, � �, �'� .;� �
� � ��� ��� � � �
� � � ��� � � � .
/ o° � �� ` � ---'
n \ �,\ � � � . _
,.- ��_ � / ,� -�.�
' '� �� ` � �` � f ° �,
� � . '
� f`, � . ,�., f .— .
. �� �ti `� . '�� . � � �•
�� � ��� % ro t '
,� � I p� � � �
� � , � � � � �, �_,
-� �, �. m r .
(� � � � r �
� � � �
� . � ,� � �
��� �,, �,,�� �
� - ��. :
� .
� �
.
Exhibit 12 .
Letter from Andy Knudtsen to Jay Peterson - February 7 , 1996
� �
�� ��LE `
. M�� ��� i
Tor�v o� v�� �
75 Sou1h Fronta�e Road Deparrment of Cornmuniry Development
Yai1, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138/479-2139
FAX 970-479-2�52
F����y a, 1996 �
Mr. Jay F�terson .
��i�eststar Bank Building
108 S. FrontaQe Road �'��est �
Va�l, Go�c�rada 81657
Re: Vail To«ln Council requ.irement for bufferi�� at the International ZT►Ting - Staff re«e�
of propased chanaes subFnitted February 2, 1996.
Dear Jay_
After rer-��tvvina the infarrnation submitted by your architects on Februar}�2, 1996, staff contimses to
hav�the c.oncerns expres�ed in the lerter 7anuary 17, 1996.
• Staff'beli�ves that a buffer af 22' is appropriate, particular�y on t�e north side of the
Isternarional�'Ving, as tlaat is in the �.�cinity ofthe decks for Condorniniums ��.�3 and ,�527.
, • 'Fhe cancept of a planter bett��een the decks sho�:ld continue to be uszd. �hat concept��-as
e�.im,inated ��ith the February 2, 199b submittal. The�lanter area should be used, instead of a
tesace, across th� area bet���een the decks.
s Please pro��ide a specinc landscape plan in the re�-ised drac�vinas indicafiing the size and.
sp�caes of the plant materiak. In,cFude a descriprion of how the area will be maintained in the
firi�re.
� S�iv that all venting and duct wark for the ele�rator can be day-�i3hted a���ay from all
cafl.dom�.iums. Please pro��ide an explanation��erifying that#his is the case and that no other
rnechanica� equiprnent��ill be lacated in�is area af�he proposa�.
Thank yas for}�our attention to these issues.
Sincer Iy,
. c.� .L��-�-----_.
Andy Kn�d sen
Senior P er
V
�t: s��co��a�
To�?�9oor3�cad
Bob A9cLztui7
F:c veryon e'an d}'�96�en er�ers a�.207
�� xEercct�nr,,PeR
� �
.
Exhibit 13 .
Letter from Town Attorney to Abplanalp - February 15, 1996
.._� _ -� ---- -- - _-� � : ��
� � ------
� ' �/i3-��'9 �
.
�. ���
'�'�G �•G�_� ��� ��i� r ��1'L r��Jl'� ,
V�" �
��� �
� � �
��.�r� � �
�
_�
��. ���
w�.
� � � � ��h ���
`s¢ � - ��� J� �s
¢� ,� � �r� p� �`� ,
• � �� s ���
�� � � � � ��
,� � ��� � �/�
�
�,,° �a ��.
d � � ��' �-� �
� �-
�- �.�.,� �. ���
� � � -
� �� ,,�- �..�.�;w �
� �
� ,�r�t� �s �.�. �,,��-�. � �
� � r
�� � ��-�
�
� � �
� -�� r���4,
,
Y s Z � �`�- .^�r,i- `.ec�'�.,rti crr- �C �
�'!���7 �� a'L`c!' �c�. /� •
� �/
.��.�. ��dj o,,c `�-.a-� G�-��
-�-�� �:� ,
,� 2, d � _ 1 �.s
� -� tl�'Z
/V� �.�.�� - 3 s�. �.r-�c.
.� �...�.. �.�._-��
, �� � �--�- .�.�-,--r.,
� ��.,� �� �,� ,�-er-��
�� ��.� c✓�-� v� � c� �-�-
c�"`'� .
,.��,�r��-
� ;
; i
�� ��
�
��
�E
�
,
I
i
t _ _
f
� �
�� u., `�
� ��
a�i�,/���
{�..�.�.�.•o,..�. �.�.�� � � �
�'.u.� (l�-:r �..�-�� e��.�..� �.
��3 �`� � ,d`�� �,�-� �
�- ��� .
� �,.�. �� �� , .� �,� g��e.
�,�__�__�� �. �'�- � �.�,� ��-
,� �
a- �.�.�,��� ,�..� �u,�,�. ,� �,c�-¢►�
�.,�., � ���, � r� �v
� �'� �� ��
�� d�, �'�..� �..�
1 U',�,�f �',� 4���- i� .
�
��',Z ,� ��- ,3 � 1�.�,� -�-�' �
r.�^'t�et Q-G �-d1'rtffLs-�� �++L. �-e�C . � .
���_ " ! �/ �
/ �
`�'��•-�r �j rn 'v -- ( .
�
- �
� �
. ,
• ` /� �
+�
�3 ����Q tC
_� . _. �� .1� ,��-��
��I ,�K� �n�l�
w� �
`�,C� �..
�
�'� � ,�, � �-�
�� � ��, r ga �c
�°—
. �i, `I°S� � 3 7 Z, 4 z,f•�� o JUv
��s ��, � � ��s ,
i. �
� -
{;
I.
;:i
�� ��>�
� � ��� � �� �� � t� � �
��i
��
__ ,; _
;
;
. :� _ _ _ -
.;�
i
_ _
_ �.; -
, �--� '1
- � , i � •
��
�o u�r o� �ArL
75 South Frantage Road O�ce of tl�e 7'own AttorrTey
va�l, Colorado $1bS7
970-�179-2107/Fax 470-479-2157 --�
� � � ll� �
�
�'ebruar}� 1�, 1996 � r 5�
HAND DELIVERED -����
fi�rt!:ur :?. A,!�p?�:u?r. Jr., F���,;rP
Dunn, Abplanalp & Christensen, P.C.
l08 S. Frontaa� Raad. Suite 30a
Vail, CO $1657
Re: International ti'�%ina - Loc��e at 1�'aii
Dear Art: �
I am writinQ in response to your correspandence of Februar�- 7, 1996 to Andy Knudtsen. I would
first like to address the public rev�ew of tl�e International 4��in; - Lod�e at Vail file. As I am sure
you are �ware. our obliQation to provide access to pa�blic rec�rds is tempered by the active �e of that
record. As I am also sure you are aware since �rour la�v frm is involved in the liti�atio�, this file is
presently in active use extensi��elv and is therefore not available for puolic revie«�at those times that
it is in use. V�%e ha��e presentl�� completed the filin� of the Dzsignated Record and an inde� of that
Record is available at ��our office. I su�aest that any revier�� of that documentation take pIace at the
District Court.
Any plans, documents. correspondence ar other nnatters that deal «�ith the developrraent o�the site
"u; vru.'�.S?G� I(1 t�ie �il;CTatinn an!� ;5f1CY_^�ai� t�P t�!:n�c* rl'F T}^.? T'arnr•.�l '•l'ii, tiJ° `�'.�::1nL'1� v: t.::.4'i�:�
-- -- -- r - - - -
inspection in a file in the To�;�n .4ttame��'s of�ice. Appoin�ments can be made ta re��i.��� such
documentation throu�h Anne �'riQht.
The Town ot Vail has not reached the conclusions. nor de �ve feel it is necessar� to re��h such
conclusions, t�1at��ou have represented in ��our correspond�r.ce as "uni��ersally accepted�� in re<,a�d
to the viol�tion of property ri�hts andlor conformitv w�ith th: 1983 Agreement.
Your position that the �'EC approval has laps�d due to a recent adoption of an ordinan�z is not
consistent u�ith the staff interpretation that has been heid since the adoption of the ordinance that
such ordinance would not intzrfere with previousl�� granted PEC a�provals for exterior altzratian.
�� R6'C'YCLEU PA}'ER
� �
�,5 far, any proposed chan�es to the de�lelopznent plan are subject to staff re��ie�v pursuant to the
'awn Counci� direction that was given at the time of their review of the Desi�n R�eview Baard
approval.
Very truly yours,
��'� � _
R. Thamas Moorhead �
Town Attomey
RTM/aw .
� �
.
Exhibi� 14 .
Lett�r fXOm Jay Peterson to Andy Knudtsen - February 15 , 1996
� �
. $A,IL�EY, G $�, PETERSON
A�ROFE55I0.\ALC.OF2PC3c2'�TION
A'1':'tl![i�t:YD AT LASV
L�ICOL'1 CE`7ER VAII.IdAI'IOI�.IL EA.TiFS BLDG.
168D F.�COiJ�9TFii'E?.SL77'E 81;3 108$4VI�i�01"'��a£r�OAA W'�6T,SL:ITE S07
DE��'GR.COLOILtiDO 30Q0� `VALL.COLO+�J�IIO 4+Cb7
TII.EPHO?�E(9A�)8.7;•1B80 �I.EPfiO.ti'E 1305;S76•Db�:
r�wi:aLltII.L�su�i�Ji�o�� FwC9FMII.�{oo�)4-6�o�e7.
Fcb=ua;}- la, 1996
Mr. Andy �Cnu�t,cn VIA F�.X NO. 97 0-:7 9-2 4 5�
S�nior Pl�nner, Tokn cf� Vail
75 �outh Frontaa� Road
Vail, Cnlorad� 81657
RE: Lod�e at �'a11 �r.�e,r.ational S;°irqjTe_race Landscap�ng
Dear Andy:
.
In r��Tiewing your lEt:.�.� ca�sc. F��x'uary 7, 1595, c�lh�c:� I receivea on
�rLzuai'y _� , 15�6 , Lh� f�lla:+�r.g ��c r.�•�� cc:a�ents: ,
1. The dls��:�c:e ��L+•ec�i L1:C cx::�ti]1�� i3c�:.k5 �7�3 our terrace �s, �t �
. minir-�um, 19 feet an� i_^. ^',�st cas�s exceeds ycu~ ze���st a� 22 feet.
The a^ea khe_e t�•a s���_�L��ri i� 19 �� zo L��t is s�ntply a plante�
se?~✓�ce ��ea, in o_der t�_a� we may ��cess t:.e Iar.�scape3 area for
IT�d1T�Et7dt;.E pU:�CSeS �.�i�.?7�L'�. �:dlkln� i:l til� ��atiLe= ds�a . WiLl�u�l.
this aCCeSS �re_ r�a:intzr,ance cf the 13t'dSC�D1.:]g �n t?:e nor±h siGe
wculd be very airr:.c�'_`.
� , � z:�, unclear c` your cor.cern in yc:�- secon�d F�in� i� �that d
la^.�srare �uF�eY =Yea re::��i_.� A�twaen the ae�ks o� L�dge Ap�xtm�nL
and o�:r t':�Y� I:��°__:.��icnal .winq. 1� la ir.�D055Z�'�!e t� �xlaand t'�e
land�cape� are� a=i tne :aa� over t�e Lodge ��artm�n�s as th�
curre;,� p?an s',:cr:s t:�e landscaped Gr�a ove� a s�ructur�.l r�ail
car=Ying �he 1cGa �11 t:�:e way down t:rcu�� the b�:=la�ny .
; . I b�liave She�:. i.-= . _ �e�s fcr�?� th� r:.anti*�g rate=_al �nd t?:e e�ze
and the swzcie� c_ �:� :'_��:;. :��ate�i=_:. . it a_so sF�cifies t:nat tt'��t
� a.�ea wi�� �e r:�'�_,_??neu �}' Lodge :�:o�:er�.ies, I:,c . �r,� ,at t:e
C�n�aM ' � TM A�=_cciatio:-:.
,
4 . Sheet A-4 . ; sho�•.s t^� e"��vator ven� zacing °_as� and away fror� Lodce
Apa�� :�t Cfl;�r3c-�i�iu:�=_ . .:o oth�r E?evator vent is $he�`n nor is
fu�:er wer�tinc �:eGessary. T?�ere ;s no fltre= meca-:�nical BCL11bi,18ri�
�h�� will :�� �oc��cd in �a�s area. 3vc v�ntir.g or �act �crk fo� t3:e
' e?evato� wi11 be daylig::�ted to*�r��d Lodge ��artmen�. Ccndc:�ir.iums .
� �
Hr. 1Lndy Y.nudtEen VTA F:►X N�. 97�-G79-?.d57
Senlo�' Planne�, To�+�n p= ���i
I'ei�7ruar�' 15 , 19�o
Page 2
I�' �ou hav� a�Zy c�vesticns = .tculd atiprecia�e a p:o�pt t��cphonc call , as
I wouZd Tike to receive fina� a�prcvai fcr our landscaping �lan.
Sincere?y, �
� r an
�'K
u
• - �
.
Exhibi't 15 .
Memoz�andum from Architect to Gornmunity Development - floor plans
and cross sections - Feb. 19, 1996
�trir�to� Hi�U J-I��UI.lH1 �.` Il�tl,.
P.O. Box 1976 ��� ��� r� � � ° Lti�U�.1������
0048 E. $eaver Creek �ivd, Suit�3
AV4N, COLQRRDQ 81620
(970) 949•0257 oA-� �� I � � � �os No. q Sg I o�I
l (
FAX (970) 949•1Q80 �rrErJrioN
� �� � = � so
TO —i~ RE:
� Gt�u v� C�
,
'V'✓lU � (�2V�i t��.�— �vt �,z e���
1�'�.� v� `;=��` �lr'Y�'2r.�C� 1
�, �� ;�=��-:--�t Y: - --:; , ,
��� . �.� ��;�
`�_ .- - I
� �' `��•+ _ LT ,�_„
WE ARE SENDING YOU �Attached 0 Under separate cover via Y+e�^'^1 ' �'Ihe iollowing+tems;_„s,
, !� ��yj i :�-°r i ':.:-F
C S hop drawings � Prin ts ❑ P lans ❑ S a m p l e s���`��O'S p e c i f r[a t i o n s=� `•
C Copy of letter ❑ Change order �
COPIES I DATE I NO. DESCR�PTIOh!
Z. Z' I!��! �• I •I �4-'f•Z /� • � �r �-f'� -' l� �
� `o v�s 6
9 '�
• �v �c
I I
� 1
� �
I ► I
i -
i �
THESE ARE TRANSMITTE� as ct�ecked below:
For zpproval � Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approual
' For your use � Approved as noted � Submit copies for distribution
= As rEquested � Returned for corrections L, Return carrected prints
_ For rev�ew and comment O �
= FOR BIDS DUE 19 � PRI�iV7S RETURNED AF7ER LOAN TO l�S
REMARKS
CQPY TO � ��1 � �
� ,� 1 .. `1 C,.1��t�, . ��, �� � I 1'1 � �-��,.,�-, /
� �
.
Exhibit 16 .
Sheet A� . 1 dated 2/16/96- mi�sing
Explanatian by the Town Attorney - "The several iterations af a
design before one is subrnit�ed which is acceptable to the Town and
the applicant are not saved ox maintained as part of the record as
they are na longer relevant and wou].d complicate the record. "
Letter to Abplanalp, Exhibzt 32 below.
! ! .
.
Exhibit 17 .
Sheet A4 . 1 dated 2/�.6✓96- missing
Explanation of Town Attorney - "The several iterations of a design
befoXe one is submitted which is acceptab].e to the Town and the
applicant are not sa�red or maintaS.ned as part of the record as they
are no longex relevant and would comp�icate the record. " Letter to
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 belaw.
� �
.
�xhibit I6 .
Sheet A4 . 2 dated 2/16/96- missing
Explanation of Town Attorney - The several iterations of a design
,�
before one is submitted which is acc�eptable to the Town and the
apglicant are not saved or maintained as part of the record a� they
are na langer relevant and would complicate th� record. " Letter to
AbpJ.analp, Exhibit 32 below.
� �
.
Exhibit 19 .
Sheet A4 . 3 dated 2/16/96- missing
Explanation of Z`own Attaz'ney � "The several iterations of a design
before one is submitted which is acce�table to the Town and the
applicant are not saved or maintai,ned as part of the record as they
are no longer relevant and would complicate the record. "' Letter to
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
� �
.
Exhibit 20 .
Sheet A4 . 4 dated 2/16/96- missing
�xplanation of Town Attorney The saveral iterations of a d�sa.gn
before one is submitted which 1is accegtable to the Town and the
applicant are not saved or maintained as part of the record as they
are no longer relevant and would complicate the record. " Lettez �.o
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
� �
.
Exhibit 21 .
Memarandum from Architect to Community Development - floor plans
and rooftop planter section - Feb. 26 , 1996
� .... , v `._ ..+ �. . �. � u ...�–_.��.i�.'.Jt:� ' :9 L!:.=.:-
D0,3 E. Be�,�er Creek Blvd. `e 303 --
AVON, C�LORADO 816. �
DATE J0=N�. I
(970) 949-4257 � " � ' � � r'D�•d
�A7� (97p) 949-1Q8� ATTENTION
� � �O
RE:
To V� � �� —" VY�Ut�l E .�-
r� •��a ` ,��.-�--�.a�� �.► �
�
1 `��-��� `� �_.. a '-+.�\ �.�v t���
.-
_ ' ' ��� `,
�-� - � �� �
T,�� .�
._ . ��� , _ -
,..
V�,!E ARE S=!�lGING YOU �A:�ached T Under seaarzte c�ver via (�� � "�'1� the folio:+•i^,g i4ems:
> -
� Shop cr���•:ings �Prints C Plans � Samples L Spec;'ications '
_� Copy of le:�er � Chznge orcfer `
I COPIES � DATE �I I IvO. i ', �ESCRIPTION
I 2' l(� G �(� I I �2� 1,�i �� c� --i-c�'�2re rv�-� �� -�-�,•--
�' ! � � �/�-�• 2— f �E'G `� °i " I�
i � I
i ! I I '
i � ; r
' � I �
! I i I
� � I
Tr�S� AF� iKANSIL^li`+�D zs Chevked belo�,�.
�For o��rovol = Apprved zs subm�;,ed Ci Resubmit ccc:�s `ar apprc•:21
�For yc;:� use � Apprc�ed as nc'e� �� S.:�mit coR�e� �or ds:rib::::�r+
� = A5 re^,:=_s:ed _ Re:...-e� for correct�ons :� F=_,.'n cer;ec.== prints
; For re::ew and carr�men; ❑
= FOR �:_5 �JUE 1� = PRIr�'T5 �ETUR�'�� �_�ER L=�': TO US
-�.'.4AP,KS
===" TG � �c,,' '/�T��"� �y1, p �YL,
��--�.e.��"-------
� �
.
Exhibit 22 .
5heet A1 . 1 dated 2/16/96- missing
Explanation af Town Attorney - The several iterations of a design
before one is submitted which is acceptable to the Town and th�
�
applicant are not saved ar maintaiz�ed as part of the recarc� as they
are no longer relevant and wouZd camplicate the record. " Letter to
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
! i
.
Exhibit 23 .
Sheet A� . 2 dated 2/16/96- missing
�xplanation of Tawn Attorney - "The several iterations of a design
before one is submitted which is acceptable to ths Town and the
app�icant are not saved or maintained as part af the recard as they
are no langer relevant and would complicate the record. " Letter to
Abplanalp, Exhibit 32 below.
� •
.
Exhibit 24 .
Memorandum from Architec� to Community D�velopment - transmitting
roof plan and roof/plan'ter section - March 6 , 1496
LtliftL' IV H�� U HJJUI.INI CJ ��al,�
P.t�. Elox l�� � � ��r ��� c,,��–�--,I�,� ��r�,r�����,��
D0�8 E. Beaver Creek BI��Su��� 3Q3 ����'' `J� U �"�' ' J� � �'�''—
AV�N, COLOR�,DO 81b20
(303) 949•0257 cAr� � _� ,� ,oeho. � 1..T���. �
FAK (303) 944-1080 J,7'TEhTION
�, , , vl�CL t.-,
TO l � YC� � ` r Yv�1��LV�f RE:
D � �"° �" �� °` ! �
— � �,�►��.�i c���l. vUr
� �� �
�
Ih'E ARE SENqING YC7U �Arached ❑ Under separate tover via _ � � @� the tollowing items:
>
• ❑ 5hop drawi�gs ❑ Frints • � Plans Q Samples � ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy oi le«er ❑ Change order C
C�PIES ! DATE I SCR�PTION
2 3'('ft� �E. I � �-eV-►�'2.�e �L2,�.-,
� � 3 '�Or�,h �{. , 2 � I��'r-'��-e ���#-io�
�
( �
i � � I
I I I
� I I I
� I I
THESE AR£ TRANStv11fi�D as checked below�
� For aa�rovzl � Apprc�:ed as submitted � Res�bmit copies for approv2!
�� For your use �� Apprcved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribuTiQn
= As req��=s:�d = �2eturced for �orrectipns '� Re'�rn correcte� pnnts
>
,:J For revie�:� and �omment �
� F�R 31DS DU� 19 �� PRINTS RETURN�D ��ER LOAN �0 US
r=�A,4RKS
z,.,, s �-�- l , �l.'v�.t �,�--►-� W� �n�.� �,,
�~I`�-+� �'S o,��+ �� ' �v''
`�� Yl u --��� ��eV fL-�Y-- c�c�.-� r
� -'V� Y' �v�. VLO�'�
3 . � v�r` �-Y'� �'�
��. �F'i� C�b V�,� ��1 � ,�£? ��rUC.2
c��•�T� 1 ��""'1 b I�. i,
_' _: . 'S . . "CYCS�.^.F:'' . =Si.CC..-. � 7 � 'tcfl '� SIG��=..� � _ ,
� �
.
Exhibit 25 .
Sheet A1 . � dated 3/6/96- Roof Plan
� . � -
, � � `� —.,_ / ,.
_. � � ^ ~r;i-\�r1 �' c }) . � i
_ J �� ` ` �~fN` , ep 1 � I r .f I
��� ����'� � � �M� f
... '�.' �"(`y`.�•'}� (
�Cr�.li ��R '� Q� �
��\�' I(�,��— o 'f
� `� i,.,��� � �
Z ° ��� �
F r � `,�'a�l:kY o ' I��
Q �� I •! .
�fl �� l � � ��fl�_�l ���.:������ f e � i� �
Clp ,,, � e� � m r���� �' � � � 4, � .
� ��' vs � � � '�
lFl d _ � 1 � q ,.: y tn ° i
�a . , p � .. � �;� �I�—��
�' m r ��. C51�J � �1 �i l��,Ar 'I I
1
mi�,.� �.' = � � `�o T ` � � j�c� �
p � I � ,r+ O -' E ���..r•�'/ :S o
Q X � m � �, ��.�'
0?� � lu �} c i�",';rk�1j
� � � .. m :
�pZ ¢ �� ��:i�.�� - � �—
� �� e /
S~ U� � �Q Q, .� �\`�r���'�_=� /
O Ca. 3�T rr'` ��
�;:�;� o I .
7. r'Y \ � j,
° ' � � � a
, � �r� � �
`�',��'� pc�� .
� ' a �"'�° � � ,
� � � � ���
j n ' � c v � � . - - — -- �/i1��1�!` \� �//� , v a °rn
1 Q � E 0 � y���°� � T!1
�} � I E J � � -�
. �n �p� � t l�
6 L� � � �4 vt�l��j��� �� �
o I � o� E !��/���1>�
; Ly i x y
lu �� �
� ` W � �! �� t� /��1��'`��J�� �a Q..�
� �} �,��'r:y' ' �` ; �,/' �n �u
� `� �'�L���'�' ���\ !/ ��1� "r' ��
m� �`'`ly .L �\�I ����� ' �• ~ u�
� i •.� '� Q}
� `�1 �=tir � � � a+�,9
QJ �'O E' � �.1 �i,� �I,, � ; /( �� ��1� ; /� [�°-� _
��q �� „ 1 "��'���� i / �������j��. � �Q�..r.. —
�m� ' i �''._I N•, cl� � �� „ o ,
��- � f i�'���-'�'c�� � � „ . d a � a
) �1.�',:�'• � \ f �
� t �.'-'''t'...- r ; � ; � `�r�"� U
��� ��;��,�, o� ' \��1f� ��,'`��,\� �, o
��� �� ; � - a
�i �::,�;�-.:^�1,�'` �� ; � �� � o a a
„��1.����s ///�''h�\� E � � n
J {
� ;� ��Ji I T � �
s ,�C j,�'•--�`����� !1J C ' � I� �+ a � �� �
� �. �., \ 1 o I k
�- �1`h��, �� \ J � �0 C �0= ='
� � 41 ,��TL..'.LI�,�.���'�` ; _ � m U� 0 \' �� o
� ('?, � �;r ,,.�,-1?- � � c c`n^ o
�o �'0 -6 -`-.�.,,.�� ,� p a��[ >
0 � � . Q�'�
��u ��� � ,�.a1� UT' ' ;� � 4 � 0� O m
v � ��'� ' � IV 3
Q o l cn- lL.. n
� }j Q) !. i {
� �' � � S Q) (� •CX.�� �`S`.J''� �.;.k ; � � �4 a
� 4� Z � �%%F^._.JV�� ,� ;� ° �� � � c
u� '
x(� + T} '° � �-�r'" � ` ��0 � , �.
� °
'�1'.� S " c a�
p C � i $ ,- n. " 1 �,'`=' "°� � C p:
� {
!a- � cn 1 � �i ;�� '.ra 1 � � �� cof�`Y
` p�' � '
. � �
�ata� ��;11 v:t"'- �i;� �....-�L._..ot
� e ry � 7'-�n -�� �� 61 — -6 � _
��m , .,, � � � � 3 � U �E z Z � Y�
�C tf�ry , � frY-., � � o p —
� �r ; s a _ > � v - Y= =a
c�� .. + `; �' �'�, i � i o � 9 � � G) N u �= ;I
r 1`
� ' ���1e�l� 1f114 � � Y �O � � p � N {.� � �� �C
`� ��`� y'y��`'1}���� �� � � o � GI QJ � L I JS G� �Z
n � � � v � U Q
�-. / C � �0 � � � ✓� ."v
� > �`i X'. � 0 �p --' � '
� 1/[)1 � ` 1 yi�:,' � � E C /.�. -' 6 N � � �� �s
1\ Y � . 1 i e .J � LL O 6? z :
��!� �' `�a������� f ,� E � v ° �. N � �
�- ,�. � ,t, _
0 `''� `° �'��= ,,�"-�',r `� � �1 �� °' � �
�� � �
I�n t �� � �
�Li � ! �ti�'� ; �� . . O�Q �D �- �,� -
Q � � i ..r � z � n
u � ,� .
• �
.
Exhibit 26 .
Sheet A� .2 dated 3/6/96- Roof Planter/Section
� �
�
_s_�.��a��oa�. �
�_-=^-; oaoaco� .
� oceao `
ooa000
�,y� 000000���� .
—4`- • oca000���� �
— ` aon�oo �[1
.�-_�. ooccoo�; �
00000cio
.,000co
� ec0000�^ � �
;, 000000q. L
cocoaa,� �
� 000000^v � �
� ' 000000� �1 E
n 00000c�+- Q � �
--'r- 000000rl
-��= o00000 �� �
000000
—1�: ooaaoo „
-=�' 0004700 m L
-�;,�: OOOOOii �
„-w,� �COOOOC �
Q O O Q O� °
V � ��: oocaoo+�
pO00D0
� � � c � OO�OOD�u
�7 v _- . O O O G D D ��
� � H — Q — DODO00�
r — �_ ` � �_....- _
C (n � E � O � < ,
ro � � � ��,�,��
0
Q n = � _
u -� � � ° � `" � v ��, �
, �.
. c � n � � � .��� �
�a f., � �p `� U� ' �
iv N SL �7 �[l � �? � �� � �
� �, v,�� ,
� ��
, � � �
'� \��\� � �
,�
� ;, �
-=�i�o�
=�fi�oo;
�7 y[ ���o o" L -
' � puj ~�_�� oo"W LLf7 �
m - oo � Q� � �
� � OGw Q q �
O O c���
• � C � �—� O 6" c �
. � � �O O<�i� 'C
v �o � •Gn���Q � �—.�� o o, n
q `c° � �
v (L 0 w �
. �
� � � 3 � ��°'�� _
u � �
> > � � �
. ` � � J , o -
. � � `p �7 � � ? u ' �l
� � �
L C IL i— � � �' d
�
� � � � � � i ,
.. . �0 � —' Q �
' � � a � ; 8
� � � _ � ' �
` Q —���
� p 0 �� t
� 0 � �1 T �� _ � ^
� p � "r����� ,� - " �w
Q 1 � � , � � 0
. . � 6. J A . �J ' .�- j�
� � O ti � v � _ ��
Q +0 Su L — � q � �! l�l
. � L � _
Q u �`
. _ v a� � - Fi, - C � rn
�' fl Q � -
_ � � � -+ ,�'J:: Q tl� �
m ;�
� v — � � � `a p�4 0 4
m � : _ - ��6 �.o�:
� >.;r � CO .J �{-`S
� .�ti \ � � � Y ��
. ��� , , - � �
� ��,.� � �' �� � ��Y
��_� � � 5
c �\�' '
s \ � �
�, \ �
m � �
` 1�'\ � ` " � Z Z � R�
� o ° � _� I w �5 Z
61 *�� � � � ��ern ,� � ��-,' �$ �r
� � � � � �
o �.:` u fl – ? � �-
a ---------,, ` �, � z :
p. ;' �, � a � 0 • � _�
� ;� 0 ` � w o R !x
� ---- ---'� � `n N � � ,��
: � 3 ��ern �
\ �F�+
• #
.
Exhibit 27 .
Staff decision approving modificat.ions set forth on plans