HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5C LOT A B C LODGE AT VAIL INTERNATIONAL WING 1992 EXPANSION BACKGROUND PART 1 OF 2 LEGAL7
This background
information was
compiled in the spring
of 1992, relating to
the proposed
expAnsion of the
International Wing
The Lodge at Vail.
at
\
K['.,! Arr1 b lvvc KAts14^/
'-gptiV,r RECflVE0 ApR - t ggKoAf[ ,'. ;l,l,.H--rN THE r.JNrrED srares-plshnrcr coupr
FoR THE DIsrRIcr oF coLoRADo " cn'r aqour
ifAR 3 01992
Gvil Action No. 89 N 1098 J{MEg R. iTANSPAKEF
LODGE TOWER COI{DOMINIUM ASSOCI.ATION ANd TOWN "ilil
RECOMMENDATION OF IJNNED STATES II{AGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiffs'I-odge Tower Condominium (todge Tower) and the Town of Vail (Vait)
commenced this action seeking to in'ralidate a land exchange between the United States and
western land Exchange company (western), acting on behalf of lodgc properties, Ine
(IfI). The dcfendants are oayton yeutrer, Sccreary of thc u.S. Deparment of
Agriculture (USDA), F. Dale Robertson, Chief of thc US. Forest Service, Manual Luj"n,
Secretary of the US. Department of thc Interior (Interior), Gary C-argill, Regional Forester
and Neil Morclg State Director of the Bureau of l-and Managemcnt (BLM) (rcfcrrcd to
collectivety as the Tederat Defendans), LPI and Western (refened to collectively as the
'?rivate Defendants"). The Private Defendants have moved to dismiss and for summary
judgmenr Both the Plaintiffs and the Federal Defendants have filed motions for partial
Plaintifiq
v.
LODGE PROPERTIES, INC; WESTERN I-Al.iD Excx{ANGE coMpAl{y; cLq,yroNYEUTTE& SECRETARI I.JNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OT ECNTCI.TTN EF. DALE ROBERTSON CHIEF, UNITED STATES FOREST SpnUCt; N,tAIrLidLUJAI{, JR., SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTME}N OF TI{E iTTEiKiE
_Gld\RI_E _CARGIIr, RS6IONAL FORESTER, ROCICY MOUNTAIN RECION,uNrrED srArEs FOREST SERvrcE NEL l_Mgncri srere DRicroiiBUREAU OF I.AI.ID NIANAGEMENT, TINITED STATES OiBANNTENT OF T}GTNTERTO&
Defendants.
summary judgment. On January 8t lgg1a Spccial Order of Reference was signed by
united States District Judge Edward w. Nottingfam punuant to 28 u.S.c $ 636(1)@) and
Rule 603 of the Lncal Rules of Practice refening tbese motions to me for a proposed
recommendatioD as to disposition. For the reasons contained heren, it is my
recommendation that the motions of the Federal Defendants and the Plaintift be granted
in part and denied in pa.r I further recornrnend that the motion of the Private pgfgndants
be denicd"l
I. TI{E FACTS
The land at issue comprises 2.07 acres, known as the lodge Parcel, situated in the
Town of Vail and formerly owned by the United States Forestry Service. On June 26,lggg,
the United States exchanged this land fili 385.81 acres of wilderness property in a tbree-uny
transaction involving the United Stateq Western, and a third party.2 A overvien, of the
events, particularly the administrative process preceding the tand exqhange, is necesary for
a full undentanding of the issues presented by the various motions.
A The First Decision to Bchange and Environmental Assessment
I The parties have submitted voluminous briefg as well as supporting documents. After
oramining the briefs, the supporting documentation, and ttre administrative record,I hara
determined that oral argument would not materiatly assist in resolving the issues prEsented.
' -JI9 land acquired by the United States consisted of private inholdinp 1t 16s Fqgles
Nest Wilderness (the Wilderness Parcel). LPI obtained an option to purchase -tbe
Wilderncss Parccl from Janice Stcrrett and Vaterie Olsen. In a three-way ilosing out of
escroq the Private Defendants paid Sterrett and Olsen for the Wilderness Parie! the
United States issued a patenr to western for the Indge parcef and LpI coweyed the
Wilderness Parcel to the United States
ln late 1983, the Forest Scrvice proposcd a multi-parcel land exchange to which LpI,
through is agent westerq respondcd-' (vol I, p. 4).' In December of 19g3, the Forest
Supervisor notified thc Boards of County Commissioncn in those counties affeaed by thc
proposed exchange. (vol. 1, p. 60). on January 6 {n4,the Forest Supervisor isnued a
Notice of Publication describing thc areas and terms of thc proposed cxchange. (vot I, p.
e5).
On January 11, 1984, the Torn of Varl, througb Paul K Stricklan4lodged an initial
objection to thc proposed exchange. (vol. I, p. 75). Orcr the next several months the
Mayor of Vail as well as dozens of Vail residents wrote to the Forest Service expressing
concerns over and objections to the proposcd orchange. (VoL tr, pp.7-159, vol. vII, pp.
120-154 168).
On January 31, 1986, the Rcgional Forester is$ed hir first Decision Notice (DN(l))
regarding the land exchange proposal. DN(l) inctudcd a finding of no significant
em'irnmental impact (FONSD based upon an Environmental Asscssment @A), conducted
in November, 19&4. (vol. wt p. 1). on March 7, !98f', vait appeated the FONSI. (vol.
vII, p. 9). Thereafter, on lvlarch 13 and 14, 1986, other Notices of Appcat were filed by a
3 As originally proposed the cxchange between the Forcst Servicc and Westcrn included
a larger Lodgc Parcel than the one finally conveyed, as well as an additional parcel, known
as Spraddle Creek, which uras not included in the final transaction . Ad. Rei Vol. tr, p. 1.
' Citations to the administrative rccord will be by volumc and p-age (V. _, p. J. For
rez$olut not disclosed by the file, the pagination of the administrative record was
accomplished in reverse order. As a result, the initial page of each document has a higher
page number than later pagcs of the same documenl
citizens'group, as well as by Emmett Mossman and David Cooper (vol. vII, pp.z+32).
The appellants submitted a lengthy Statement of Reasons in support of their appeals;
appended letters from town of6cials, residents and property owne$; and attached a petition
with over 1100 signatures of individuals protesting the proposed orchange.
On May 19, 1986, the Deputy Regional Forcster issued a statemcnt indicating that
the Novembcr, 1984 EA might have been deficient As a result, the DN(l) was withdrawrt
thereby mooting the pending appeals. (Vol. vI[ p. 309). A supplement to rhe original EA
was ordered. (Vol. VII, p.310).
B. The Second Decision Notice PN(2)) and Appeal
On June 19, 1986, a new Decision Notice and FONSI were issued by the Regional
Forester. (Vol. I, p. 173). DN(2) also contained a finding that the exchange was in the
public inrcrest, as required by 43 U.S.C $ 1716. The accomparying revised EA included
discussions of the proposed exchange, alternatives to the proposed exchange, and public
interest e\Eluations for each alternative. (Vol. V[ p. 110). In discussing the first altemative,
which involved a conveyancc of the Lodge Parcel to the Private Defendants, the EA
assumed that the most probable use of the property would be for the addition of 1fr) hotel
rooms to the I-odge at Vail. (Vol. VL p. 9i). The EA noted that this assumed use would
provide a significant positive benefit to the economy and tax base of Vail. (vol. u, p. 91).
'On July 2& 1986, Mossman, C.ooper, and Vail appealed DN(2) and the EA (Vol. V[
pp. 11&167). The parties to the appeal were pcrmitted to make-oral statements at the
ofEces of the Associatc Deputy Chief of thc uS$.r (vot v[ pp. zfl , 2g). Thereaftcr,
on April 29, 7987, the Chief of the Forest Scrvice rcmanded the matter to thc Regional
Forester. (Vol. ! p. 176). In essence, the Chicf concluded that he had no basis for
rwiewing cither DN(2) or the EA becausc no appraisal had been made of the tands
involved in the proposed exchangc. (Vol.VI, p.301).
C The Aopraisal Process. the Third Decision Notice @N(3)). and Appeal
The land subject to the exchange was appraised (vol. v, p.z$. Thc appraisat of
the 2+ acre lodge Parcel noted that the existing zoning I Vail was for open space.
Nevertheless, the appraiser assumed that the most feasible use of the parcel would be for
recreational residential purposes. (Vol. V, p.%Q. As a result, the valuation of the l-odge
Parccl was predicated upon development of onc single family rcsidence (thc highcst and best
use permissible under the zoning which the appraiscr determincd to bc Eost probable once
the land was placed in private hands). (vot v, pp. 25G51).' DN(3) was issued on
September 17,7!n7. Based on thc 1986 EA DN(3) concluded that thc cxchange would bc
5 Decisions made by Forcst Supewisors are appcaled to the Regional Forester; decisions
made by the Regional Forester arc appealed to the Chicf of the Forest Serrrice; and
decisions of the Chief of the Forest Scrvice rray bc appealcd to the Sectctary of Agriculture.
Reviewby the Secretary is wholly discrctionary an4 if not qpccificatly acccped for rwiew
by the secretary within rcn dap of filing, the chiefs decision becomcs final 36 cFR
$ 211.18(D(4).
' The Forest Service Appraisat Handbook 6bu soo.r2 $ L141)) requires tbat
appraisen determine fair market nalue of land as jf printely orvied inespectira of its
present ornenhip. Although Vailt zoning for Forest Scrvice land nas open spacg thc
appraiser concluded that in private handg the zoning would be upgraded to permit somc
t'?e economic utilization
5
in the public interest and found that it would not have a significant environmental impacr
(Vol. I pp. 182-187). Appeals were again taken by Vail Mosman, Cooper, and L,odge
Tower, the latter requesting intervenor status. (Vol. V pp. 14, 1&15, and 299-303). The
appeals raised numerous issues, including alleged deficiencies in the EA the FONSI and
the appraisal.
On June 16, 1988, the Chief of the Forest Service upheld DN(3) on all issues except
the validity of appraisal, and remanded the to the Regional Forester for the linited purpose
of reappraisal. (Vol. I, p. 189). The Chiefs instructions upon remand were to reappraise
the Lodge Parcel as if it were zoned "the same as existing and/or potential zoning of nearby
similar or adjoining private properties." (Vol. I, p. 189).
A subsequent appraisal r"as compieted on November 1, 198& (Vol. tr, p. 347). The
appraiser concluded that, although the surrounding properties were commercially zoned the
highest and best use for the Lodge Parcel under the most pmbable zoning applicable if the
ProPerty were in private hands. would be for one, or perhaps two, residential homesites.'
(VoL II, p. 357). The appraisal valued the L07 acre parcel at $915,000.r
The appraiser cited political legal and economic infeasibility of upzoning including
incompatible adjacent land useg physrcal constraints of the site and political opposition to
developmenl (Vol. II, p. 357). Additionally, the appraiser cited two recent hiled attempts
to simply subdivide property for single family use. (Vol. II, p. 356).
t Vail submitted an appraisal rcport prepared by an independcnt appraiscr who
concluded that the LM acre parcel had an estimated value of $4263,000 based on a highest
and best use of 37 condominium units averaging 1,5fi) square'feEt per unit. The vas!
difference in naluation between Vail's appraiser and the Forest Service appraiser was cleady
due to a divergence of opinion regarding the zoning issue. Vail's appraiser took the Chiefs
instructions literally, and appraised the propery as if it were zoned commercially. On the
D. The Final Decision Notice (DN(4)) and Appeal
On November & 198& yet another decision notice and FONSI wcre issucd by thc
Regional Forester. (Vol. I,, p. Da). Unlike previous versions, DN(4) addressed the matter
of public access on the existing Mill Creek Road. While reserving a perpetual easement in
the pateng DN(4) fuither provided that'Indge Properticg Inc, shall have the rigtrt to
relocate said access easements at thc lndgc's sole cxpensc, provided such relocation does
not interfere with use of the road by the United states or the public.' (vol. I p. 193). It
was specifically noted in DN(4) that the Lodge Parcel had been reduced from 2J acres to
L07 acres. DN(4) made no mention of the fact that the development assumptions in the
1986 EA were inconsistent with the development assumptions utilized by the Forest Service's
appraiser in naluing the l-odge Parcel.
Administrative appeals to the Chief of the ForestService were filed byl-odgc Tower,
Vail, and Mossman, and Western was granted leave to interrane. In additioq Iodge Towcr
requested a stay of the decision pending appeal. (Vot M p. 8). On December ?Z lW
the Reviewing OfEcer (the Associate Dcputy Chief) granted a stan indicating that deeds or
patents should not be exchanged until the Forest Service ruled on the merits of the appcat.
(Vol. M p. 23). Prior appeals had resolved all manen cxcept thc adequacy of thc
reappraisal. with respect to this remaining issue, bNl+1 suted: 'The approred appraisals
other hand, the Forest Service appraiser took into account Vail's zoning history and thc
town's attitude toward development of the lrdge Parcel in arrMng at his opinion that thc
most probable zoning of the property in private hands would be primary/secondary
residential.
meet the rcquirements of law, policy, thc Chiefs remand order, and the appraisal
instructions which were concurred in by the Ctrief.n 6vol. I, p. 193). on June 16 1989, tbe
reviewing of6cer affirmed DN(4). (Vol. M p.607). On Junc ?5,7989, thc acting Assistant
Secretary of Agriculture deterurined not review the matter. (Vol. It p. aB).
E. The exchange orocess
Forest Service, the Defendants were taking steps to insure that the exchange would ctose on
an expedited basis if the appeal proce$ concluded favorably to them. On May 3Q 1989, the
Forest Service, LPI and the third-party owners of the Wilderness Parcel executed escrow
instnrctions. These instructions required that all documents and monies necessary to close
the exchange would be held in escroly by a title company.' (VoL I, pp. 13+38). Furthcr,
and notwithstanding the pendency of the appeaf on June ltg$g,the Regional Director of
Iands for the Forest Service reguested the BLM to issue a patent for the l"odge Parce[
certifying tbat the cxchange met the rcquiremenc of law and regulations. (Vol. L pp. 295-
e7).
On June 26, L9{39, and within minutes of receMng the notification that the Secretary
had declined review, the closing out of essrow occured, and the title doorments were
recorded" By the time Plaintiffs filed this action, approximately ten minutes after the
recording ofthe deeds and patents, the status quo ante had already been altered thereby
' A cash equalization payment of $145,000 was paid ro the Forest Service by LPI in
order to balance the value amount of the 2.07 acre parcel with the 385 acres of wilderness
acreage being exchanged. (Vol. l, p.296).
effectively mooting Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Resnaining Order filed along with
their complainr
TI. THE EEDERAL DEFEI{DANTS'MOTION FOR SUMIVTARY JI,DGMENT
A Proprieqv of Summary Judgmcnt
Before delving into the merits of the Plaintife' Motion for Partial grrmmsly
Judgment, the Court must first consider the propriety of summary judgment a1 thic s6gg ef
the proceedingp. While it would appear that suis for judicial rwiew under the
Administrative Procedure Act based upon an administratira record would readily lend
themselves to resolution on motions for summary judgment, therc arc indications in the
decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit leading to a contrary conclusion.
E.9.. Heber Vallqv Milk Co. v. Butz 503 F2d 96 (10th Cit.1974); Nickol v. United States.
501 F.2d 1389 (1fth Ct.1g74). These decisions suggest that when a court rEviews an
administrative record to determine whether the agency's decision is supported by substantial
evidence, thc court must entcr findings of faa an4 thus, summary judgment may bc
inappropriate. I:ter cases have read Heber and Nickol as not precluding surnmaty
judgrnent in administrative rcrriew cases, but rather as simply requiring tlnt the hiat court
explain ie decision in sufficient detail to permit appellate rwiew. Eg- Hallcnbeck v.
Kleppe. 590 F.zd 852 (1fth cir. 1979); Hill v. Morton. 5E F2d 327 (t}th cir. 1975).,0
I have fully reviewed the administrative record in this case, and my Recommendation
!0 It should also be noted that Nickol and Hill invofued review under a "substantial
evidence" standard. As discussed more fully in the tort jg1@ the appropriate standard for
review here is whether the agency's action was narbitrary and capricious.n
will outlne in detail the factual support in the record for cach of my conclusions. I have
further determined that the the issues raised by the cross motions for summary judgment
and ry the motion to dismiss can be ;esolved as a Eoatter of law by a review of the
administrative record, without further judicial proceedingp. As a result, is appears to be of
little consequence whether my recommended disposition is deemcd to be punuant Rulc 56
or is considered to be a non-Rule 56 determination based upon an examination and rwiew
of the agenry record.
B. The First Oaim for Relief flhe Forest Service's Finding of Public Interest under
FLPMA)
Both the General Exchange Act, 16 U.S.C. $ 485 and FLFlrdA 43 U.S.C $ i716(a)
permit the Secretary of Agriculture to exchange lands in national forests upon a
determination that the exchange will sewe and benefit the public interesl Additionatly,
FLPI\4A mandates that in considering the public interes! the Secretary shatl give full
consideration to nbetter Federal land management and the needs of State and local people,
including needs for lands for the economy, community.expansion, recreation areaq food
fiber, mineralg and fish and wildlife . . .' 43 u.S.c g 1716(a).tt The Plaintiffs'fint claim
for relief asserts that (a) the Secretary's decision to enter into the exchange is not in the
public interesq and (b) the Secretary improperly applied the criteria identified in Section
1716(a). The Federal Defendants have moved for summary judgment on this claim on the
_ !r $imilsl "public interest" type findinp are required under 43-US.C $ 1716(b) (the
Secretary must find that thc Federal tand is "propeifor transfer out of Federal omership
: . .:)r and 36 C.F.R. $ 25a3(a)(1)(iv)(he parcel must be nsuitable for elimination from the
NIFS.").
10
Founds that (a) the complaint fails to state a claim for retiet p) Plaintiffs' failed to
adequately raise the issue of public intcrest in the administrative proceedingis; (c) thc
.Secretary's public intcrest determination is not rwiewable; and (d) even if reviewable, thc
Secrctary's decision was not arbitrary and capricious.
The fint staim for relief in Ptaintift' first amended and supplemental comptaint
alleges that the land exchange here in question is not in the pubtic interesg and that the
Lodge Parcel is not proper for transfer out of fedcral oyncrship. Paragraph 45 of the first
amended and supplemental complaint contains a summary of facton supporting thc
Plaintiffs'position. In addition, a lenghy statemcnt of facts, contained in paragraptrs 1,t-39,
is incorporated by referenc€ into the first claim for relief and discusses the Federal
Defendants' decision to cxchangc the Indge Parcel for thc Wilderness Parcel. (Complain!
paragraph 26(a)-(g)).
Thc government asserts that these allegations.are inadcquate because they do not
sufEciently speo$ the reasons why the rctcntion of the lndgc Parccl in federal ownenhip
would better promote the public interesl of course, F"R"CP. g(axz) merely requires a
short and plain statement of a pany's claim for relief, Altegations pass Duster if they givc
the opposing party fair notice of the clairn and permit bi- to prepare a resporxive pleading
Runyan v. united Brotherhood of carpenters 566 F. Supp. 600, 608 (D. coro. 1983). A
complaint should not be dismissed unless it appcars.beyond doubt that the plaintiff can
prove no sct of facts which would entitle him to relief..Conleyv. Gibson. 355 US. 41,45.{6
(1957); Harbert v. Raoo. 415 F. Supp. 83 (D. Okla. 1975). Judged by the liberal pleading
11
standards aPplicable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the allegations in the fint
claim for refief contain the requisite specificity to withstand a motion to dismiss or a motion
for summary judgment premised on pleading deficiencies.
The Federal Defendants ne>d contend that judicial review of the Regional Forester's
public interest finding is baned because the plaintiffs failed to raise the issue during the
administrative appeal process. Absent exceptional circumstanceg a reviewing court will not
consider questions which were not raised before the administrative agency. Hormel v.
Helvering.312 U.S. 552 QgaQ; Wilson v. Hodel. 758F.2d 1369 (10th Cir. 1985).
After reviewing the Statements of Reasons (SORs) filed by the Plaintiffs, and the
attachments thereto, I conclude that the public interest issues were adequately raised during
the administrati"e pro""sr. For example, the SORs relating to the appeals of DN(1) and
DN(2) are replete with discussions of factors which were either allegedly not considered or
not adequately considered in the initial Ed Specifically, the SORs take issue with th;
FONSI in light of the EA's assumptions as to the proposed use of the Indge Parcel S the
Private Defendans. The fact that the contentions are directed at the EA rather than at
the public interest facton identified in FLPMA is not signficant, since many of the samc
consideradcns.are applicable to both. Deficiencies in the appralsal process and the agency's
highest and best use determinations are discussed in detail in the SORs filed punuant to the
appeals of DN(3) and DN(4). Although the SORs may not have expressly identified these
matters as going to the issue of "public interest" under 43 U.S.C. $ 1716, this, in itsef, should
not'bar the Plaintiffs from judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act
72
While the plaintifR have satisfied the procedural conditions precedent to inrokc their
right of judicial review, the Federal Defcndants' position concerning thc plaintiffs'
substantive right to review has rcme degree of meriL The Administrative Procedure Act,
5 U.S.C. $ 701(a)(2) expressly precludcs judieial rwiew of any administrative action which
is committed to agency discretion by law. The C,ours have construed this exclrsion
narrowly, holding that is application is limitcd to those rarc situations where a statute is
drawn in such broad terms that there is "no law to apply.' Citizcns to Preserve Overton
Park v. VolPe. 401 U.S. n14rc (1970). Though the exception is narrow, it has consirtently
been applied to the ultimate finding of an administrative agency that its decision is in the
public interest E.e. Sellas v. Kirlc 200F2d 217 (9th Cir. 1952), cert. denied. 345 US. 940
(1953); Ferryv. udall. 336F.2d706 (9th cir. 1964), ceft denied.381 u.s.904 (1965).
More specifically, the "committed to agency discretionn cxemption has been found applicable
to public interest finding made in connestion with federal Iand cxciange rtecisions. @
oubv. Hickel. 67 F.2d 1048, 1051 (6th cir. 1972), cert. denied sub nom.. siena oub v.
Morton.411 u.s. 920 (1973); I-ewis v. Hicket. 427 F.zd 673 (9th cir. 19/0), cert denied.4fi)
u.s. e92 (1e71).
The fi'al determination as to whcther federal lands are appropriate for transfer out
of federal ornership and whether a land exchange is in the public interest involves a
weighing and balancing of costs and benefis. This weighing and balancing process is not
governed by legal principleg but is peculiarly within the ocpertise of the administrative
agency charged with managing the land i1 question. As suciq the ultimate decision that an
13
exchange is in the public interest is nonreviewable.o
Although the finding of public interest, in itself, is not reviewable, this does not m€an
that the entire decision-making process relating to land exihanges is outside the realm of
judicial scnrtiny. Judical review may still be available on specific questions. National Forest
Preservation Group v. Butz ,|85 F.2d 408 (9th cir. 1973). For example, 43 u.s.c. $ 1716(a)
mandates that in considering the public interest, the Secretary of Agriculture must'g"c full
consideration to better Federal land managment and the needs of State and local oeople.
including needs for lands for the econom.v. communitv expansion. recreation areas. foo4
fiber, ninerals, and fish and wildlife . . . ." Under Section 706(2)(4) of the Administrative
Procedure Acg this Court has the power to "hold unlawful and set aside agenry action . . .
found to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion" or otherwise not in accordance with
law." One of the matters to b€ addressed by the C.ourt under 5 U.S.C $ 706(2XA) is
whether the Secretary properly considered the reler/ant hcton identified in 43 U.S.C
$ 1716(a). Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe 401 US. 401 476 (1970)("court must
consider whether decision was based on consideration of the relevant factors . . . .'). See
also Florida Power & Light Co. v. lnrion. 470 u.s. 729,743 (19s5); Motor vehicte Mfgn.
Assh v. State Farm Mur Ins. Co., ,163 U.S. 29 (1983); Kapcia v. Immigration &
Naturalization Sewice. 944F.zd701708 (10th Cir. 1991); Central States Const. v. Small
u Likewise, the Plaintiffs would not be entitled to a raniew of the Federal Defendants'
decision to determine whether it is based on substantial evidence. A substantial evidencc
review is limited to situations where the agency is exercising its nrlemaking porer or its
decision is based on a public adjudicatory hearing. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.
Volpe. 401 U.S. &2 (L970).
14
Business Admin., 770 F. Supp. 12147, 1453 (D. Kan. 191)
The administrative record in this case reveals that the Regional Forester's finding of
public interest was premised in substantial pan upon an assumed use of the Iodgb Parcel
for additional hotel accommodations. The the 1986 Environnrental Assessment, which
formed the basis for the Forest Service's NEPA finding: of no significant inpacq as well as
for its FLPlvlA findings of public interesl indicated that if this proposed use wias approvcd
by the town, approximately 100 hotel rooms would be addcd. (vot v[ p. 093). The 1986
EA also stated:
Potentially, the most sigrrificant positive benefit of exchanging
this Parccl is the economic impact on the Town of Vail.
Spraddle Creek and the Lodge parcels could be added to the
Town's ta:r base. Also, stimulation of the local economy could
be enhanced through local workforce memben if development
occurs on these parcels. A study conducted in 1gg3 by
managemcnt consultants Pannell. Kern & Forrester indicatesthat the Vail Village area needs additional hotel
accommodations to effectivelv market its services. Additionally.
increased accommodations will be needed to meet needs
associated with the proposed ski area expansion. This parcel
would offer that oopornrnitv. (Vol. VI, p. 091).
Atlhough both the findings of no sigrificant environment impact and public interest
were predicated on the use of the lodge Parcel for dwelopment of hotel accomodatiory
even the 1985 EA recognized that such a u;e was dependent upon a change in Vail's zoning
classifications. (See vol. vI, at p. 093, where the EA observes: 'In fact, no development
can (rccur unless the current zoning classifications are changed to allow more intensira uses
such as those contemplated by Indge Properties, Inc.").
After the preparation of the EA, the Forest Service essentially abandoned its poaition
15
that the lndge Parcel would be utilized for development of hotel accomodations. Instead,
during the appraisal process required under FLPMd the Forest Service appraisen adopted
the position that the most probable use of the Lodge Parcel would be for primary/secondary
residential development as a single homesite or as two homesites. (Vol. [V, p. 379). The
appraisers concluded that there was little or no demand for additional hotel rooms in Vail,
and that the adoption by Vail of zoning which would permit the constnrction of hotel
accomodations or any other commercial use *as highly unlikely. (Vol. M pp.385-383).
The Regional Forester accepted the Forest Service appraiser's position concerning
the most likely usc of the l-odge Parcel. Thus, in the Responsive Statement to the
conpolidated appeals of DN(4), the Regional Forester stated tbat (a) the lndge Parcel was
not Physica[y suited for development as a free-standing hotel; (b) the economic viability of
a new hotel development was questionable; and (c) the the torrn of Vail was not likely to
zone the parcel for commercial or multi-family residential developmenl (Vol. M p. a56).
DN(4), issued on Novembcr 11, 1988, implicitly adopts the opinion of the Forest
Service appraiser regarding the most probable use of the Lodge Parcel. (See Vol. I, pp. 194,
wherein the Regional Forester adopts the. Forest Service appraiser's valuation of the l-odge
Parcel). Yet, the FONSI and public interest finding is premised on the information
contained in the 1986 Ed which, in turrq considered an entirely different utiti-a1ie1 o11t"
property.s
! The Federal Defendants' brief in support of their motion for partial sunmary
judgment states that the public interest eraluation for Forest Service land cxchange
proposals is accomplished as part of the NEPA evaluation. See Govenment's Mcmorandum
16
The Federal Defendants argue that thc discrepancy betwcen the the most probable
use of the Indge Parcel identified during the raluation process and the assumed use for
purPoses of the public intercst and FONSI determinations is simply a result of different
standards applicable under the FLPIvIA mluation procedures and NEPA I have reviewed
the FLPIvIA valuation procedures contained in the Uniforu Appraisal Standards and thc
Forest Service Appraisal Handboob the statutory facton which the Forcst Sewice is
reguired to toke into account in Oercrnining whethcr a tand exchange is in the public
interest; and the methodologr to be employcd in complying witb NEP.d I find no conflict
among them. Where federal action consists of conveying federal lands to private dwelopers,
neither the public interest nor the enviromental impaa can be adequately considercd
without an agency assessment of the most likely or probable use of the propcrty oncc it
comes into private hands. See Northern Plains Resources Council v. Luian 874F2i (fr11,
666 (9th Cir. 1939).
The Federal Defendants apparently acknorledge that they must ana$tre public
interest based on the most probable future darelopment of tbe land by the transferee. They
assert that they complied with this requircment by eliciting statements from LPI that it
wished to utilizc the Lodge Parcel for hotcl expansion. See Federal Defendants'Brief
opposing Plaintifrs'Motion for Summary Judgment, pp.z+zs). However, wherg as hcre,
the agency dercrmines that neither oristing nor reasonab! probable future local zoning
would permit such a use, the dweloper's hlpothetical plans are at best spcculatirc and at
In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgrnen! p. 9.
17
worst illusory.
In shorg the administrative record clearly establishes that the public interest findings
made by the Regional Forester and affirmed by the Chief Forest Service are based, at least
at best. The
spirit, if not the letter, of FLPIv{A requires that the factors identified in 43 US.C. $ 1716(a)
be evaluated bascd upon the most probable utilization of the Iodge Parccl While ajudiciat
tnbunal should not substitute its judgment for that of the Forest Service concerning the most
probable development of the subject propcrty, the court cannot abdicate its rwiewing
responsiblity under the Administrative Procedure Act by sanctioning the selection of a use
which the agency itself views as largely fictional.
Based on the foregoing I conclude that the Federal Defendants are not entitled to
judgment as a matter of law on the Plaintiffs' fint claim for relief and thercfore, I
recommend that the Federal Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the firit
cliaim for relief be denied"il
C. The Second and Fifth Claims for Relief (Valuation under FLPMA)
The exchange provisions of FLPMA require an equalization of rralue between the
parcels being fansfened into and out of federal on'nership. In this regar4 43 US.C.
$ 1716(b) states:
" fite fact that the mwing party is not entitled to judgment uiider the applicabte law
is an appropriate basis for denying a motion for summary judgmenr See Krieger v.
Ornenhip Corp.,27OF.2d265 (2d Cir. 1959); Welt v. Koehring Co.,482F. Supp. 437 (N.D.
ru. 1e79).
18
The values of the lands cxchanged by thc Scaetary under this
Act and by the &cretary of Agriculture under applicable law
relating to lands within the National Forest System either shall
be equal, or ifthey are not.equal, the values shall be equelized
by the payment of money to the grantor or to the Secretary.
ooncerned as thc circumstances require so long as payment does
not cxceed 25 Wr centuE of the total value of thc lands or
interests transferred out of the Federal ourenhip.
The PlaintifR' second claim for relief conrcnds that tbe Forest Sewice failed to
appraise the l.odge Parcel in accordancc with applicable regrlations and instnrctions
regarding highest and best use and, as a result, the land was significantly undervalued. The
fifth claim for relief alleges that the Forest Senice appraisal underlying thc cxchange
decision valued the bdge Parcel as of May 15, 1987, although the final decision to approve
the land exchange did not occur until November q p88. This delay, arguc the Plaintifisr
resulted in a violation of agency guidelines which provide that an appraisat is only nalid for
one year from the date of an exchange agreemenl. Forest Service Manual $ 5413.1(2)
(Unless fixed S an exchange agreement, the appraised value is nalid for one year from thc
date of the appraisal.).
The Federal Defendants have moved for summary judgment on ttre second and fifth
claims on the grounds that (a) PlaintifFs have no right of action and/or no remedy under the
Administrative Procedure Acq and (b) Plaintiffs lack standing to raise valuation issues under
FLPMA While I disagree with the Federal Defendants on their first poing I fully concur
with their second contention.
The Administrative Procedure Act vests the federal courts with judsdiction to rwiew
l9
agency action and also constitutes a waiver of the gorernmentt sovereign immunity. The
Federal Defendants acknowledge this Court's jurisdiction, but assert that because the
exchange has already occurred and a patent has issued for the l,odge Parcel, the Plaintif&
have no right of action In support of this position, the Federal Defendants rely on several
decisions indicating that only those who assert a superior title to the government have the
right to attack the validity of a federal land patent E g.. Fisher v. Rule. 248 U.S. 31q 318
(1919); Rayoath. Inc. v.. citv of Anchorage. 544 FJd 1019 (9th cir. 1976); Kare v. united
States. 489F.2d M9 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied.4lZ U.S. 975 (1974).
FLP\'IA itself creates no private right of action. Nevertheless, and contrary to the
Federal Defendants'position, the Administrative Procedure Act does confer a right of action
in favor of aggriwed persons for judicial rcview of administrativc agency decisions. Sierra
club v. Hodel. 848 F.2d 1068, 1076 (10th cir. 1988). 'section 702 of the ApA permits
actions against an agency even when there is not an implied right of action" under the
particular statute pu$uant to which the agency purported to acL Id. The Administrative
Procedure Act confers a broad right to review agency decisions, with only narow exceptions
where (a) review is orprcssly prohibited by satute; or p) the matter is commited to agency
discretion by law. 5 U.S.C. $ 701. Absent the applicability of one of these two exceptiory
the agenry bears "the heavy burden of overcoming the strong presumption that C.ongress did
not mean to Prohlbit all judicial ret/iew of [the agency's] decision.n Dunlop v. Bachowski
421 U.S. iffi,567 (1975); Sierra Oub v. Hodel. 848 F.2d 1063, 1925 (lfth Cir. 1988).
I conclude that under the circumstances of this case, the doctrine precluding attack
20
on land patents has no application. Many of thc cases cited by the Fedcral Defendants
involve suits brought by advene claiman6 to fedcral lands. Thcse decisions stand for tbc
proposition that the Quiet Title Act,28 U.S.C. $ 2,109a, supplies the exclusira remedy for
5ugh glaims, and that the claimant cannot avoid the mandates of the Quiet Title Act by
bringng an independent suit under the Administrative Proccdure AcL E.9.. Donnell.v v.
united states. 841 F.2d 96,977 (fth ctu. 1988); Mclntwe v. united States. zSg Frd 1408
(9th Cir. 1986); I-ee v. United States W F.2d 1406 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied sub nom.
I-ee v. Eklutna- Inc., 4&l U.S. 1041 (1988). Hovever, in the present case, the plaintiffs are
not adverse claimants to the l-odge Parcel. The dispute here does not invohe competing
claims to title, but rather the alleged failure of thc Forest Service to follow its orm
regulations and instnrctions in processing a proposed land exchange. This tlpe of claim does
not fall within the ambit of the Quiet Title Acr
In addition, the administrative record ctearly cstablishes that the escrow arrangemenb
and other mechanations of the agency to faciliarc dclivery of thc patent within minutcs aftcr
thg sqmpletion of the administrative appeal were specificalty designed to preclude judicial
review under thc Administrative Procedure AsL Thc case law amply supporB tbc
proposition that an agency cannot cut off Administrative Procedure Act r€view or the
availablility of a remedy by simply expediting delivery of a land patent. See DonnelF v.
United States. 8/.1F.2d968,972 n.5 (9th Cir. 1988)("We dcctine to construe Mclnqrrre as
requiring the absurd result that the governmcnt could deprive someone of property title by
adurinistrativc unongdoing and then immunize its actions by sclling the contested property
21
on the eve of trial."); National Forest Preservation Group v. Butz 4tt5 F.2d 408, 411 (9th
Cir..1973).'5
AlthougtL under the circumstances presented here, the Administrative Procedure Act
creates a right of review despite the delivery of a patent, I conclude that the p[aintiffs lack
standing to seek review of the Forest Service valuation of the lodge Parcel. My conclusion
is prernised on the fact that neithcr of the Plaintiffs can demonstrate a real and immediarc
injury arising from the alleged underrraluation of the subject properry.
Standing goes to the court's subject matter jurisdiction. United States v. Citv of Twin
Falls. Idaho. 806 F.2d 862 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied sub nom. Ciqv of Twin Falls. Idaho
v. Envirotech corp., 482 u.s. 914 (1987). In the context of an action under the
Administrative Procedure Act, the standing requirement has both constitutional and statutory
aspects. Article III standing requires that'federal plaintiffs must allege some threatened or
actual injury resulting from the putatively illegal action before a federal coun may assumc
r The Plaintiffs point to various statutes and regulations, which they allege were violated
by the speedy delivery and recording of the patents and deeds. Lg., 43 U.S.C. S$ 1716 and
1718 (Secretary of Interior may issue patents for Forest Service land exchanges only after
any disposal authorized by the Act); 36 C.F.R. $ 25a.10(d)(administrativc rights to appeal
apply to decisions apprwing land cxchanges); FSH 5,109.13 - land Acquisition Handbook
$ 38.4 (prohrbition of conveyances of federal lands before completion of congressional
oversight and resolution of appeals); 36 C.F.R. $ 211.18(4xi)(an administrative stay remains
in effect for 10 days after a decision on the merits, unlcss a different period is specified in
the decision documents). As the Federal Defendants point out, each of these prwisions can
be read as applying only to proceedings which are part of the administrative review proces;,
and as not bearing on the timing of an exchange once the adminislrative process is at an
end. Nevertheless, when considered in combination with the Administrative Procedure Ac!
there is a clear intent manifested by Congress and the agencJ itself to p€rmit not only an
effective administrative appeal but atso an effective and meaningful judicial review.
1','
jurisdiction." Linda R.s. v. Richard D., 410 u.s. 6\4,677 (lg7g).In other words, standing
in the constitutional sense mandates that there be a nens between the defendant's allegcdly
illegal conduct and the plaintitFs purported injuries. Sabine River Auth. v. US. Depr of
Interior. 951 F2d 669 (sth Ctr.LWz).
The "injury in fact" necessary to support Articlc III standing nced not be substantial;
an identifiable trifle will suffice. United States v. Studcnts Chaltenging Regulator.v Agency
Procedure (SCRAP). 412 u.s. 69 (t973). Neverthelesq the injury must be perceptible,
concrete and specifiq Id. at 68$ as well'as rcal and immediate, rather than conjectural or
hypothetical. california Banken tus'n v. shulu.416 us. 21,69 (L974). Aplaintiffmaynot
rely on 'the remote possibility unsubstantiated by allegations of facl that ftis] situation might
have been bettcr had respondents acted otherwise, and night improne were the court to
afford relief. warth v. seldin. 42, vs. 4go, 507 (1925). Normally, a mere allcgation of
'mjury in fact" uill sufEce, but, if controverted b1 thc defendant, the plaintiff must
demonstrate facts zupporting his allcgation. Public Citizen v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp, 5615
F.2d 708, 774 n.22 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
In addition to Articte III standing the Adminiitrative Procedure Act has a separate
and distinct standing requiremeng namely, that the plaintitr bc advcnely affccted or
aggriwed. This has been construed to require not oniy a shoving of "injury in facg" but also
that the interest sought to be protected by the complainant is arguably within the rcne of
interests protec'ted or regulated by the statute which purportedly authorizes the complaincd
of agenry action. oarke v. securities Industry Assh. 479 us. 3ss, 395-96 (19s?);
23
Assosiation of Data Processing Service organizations v. camp. 392 u.s. 150 (1970).
PlaintifB cannot demonstrate standing simply because they have been injured by the
Forest Service land exchange. Rather, in the present case, the Article III standing
requirement mandates that Plaintiffs show a nonspeculative causal connection between their
injuries and the alleged violation of the equal value prorisions of FLPMA Northern Plains
Resource Comcil v. Lujan. 874F.2d661 (9th Cir. 1989). Plaintitts attempt to establish this
nexus by arguing that the Forest Service appraisen' failure to follow regulations and
instructions regarding the appropriate zoning resulted in an arbitrarily low appraised value
for the Indge Parcel. They further contend that this insuffisient appraised value assigrred
to the lodge Parcel may (a) adversely impact the value of surrounding properry; @) result
in a low assessed value of the l.odge Parcel for property tax purposes; and (c) permit other
ProPerty ortners in the tovn of Vail to contest property tax assessments. In support of these
contentions, plaintiffs point to the fact that the county assessormust take into account recedt
.sales of like properties in setting actual value for tax purposes. May Stores Shooping
Centen. Inc. v. Shoemaker. 151 Colo. 700,376P.2d 679 (1%2);Colorado and Utah Coal
Compan!, v. Rorer 149 Colo. 502.,369 P.zd 796 (196?).
Plaintif;ts have made no showing that the appraised ralue assigned to the lndge
Parcetr for purposes of the exchange has negatively impacled either the value of property in
Vail or the assessed valuation assigned to the lndge Parcel or surrounding land.r Further,
r In an attempt to solidiff their contentions regarding injury in facq Plaintitrs have
submitted affidavig from the Budget OfiEcer of the town of Vail and the appraiser for the
Eagle County Assessor. The Budget Officer's affidavit simply states that if the Forest
Plaintiffs' assertion that the Forest Service appraisal will ha're a sigrificant future bearing on
values or assessed valuations is simply erroneous. While the price paid for comparable
properties is clearly a relevant factor in valuing nearby reat estate, the comparable sales or
market data approach to value prohibis consideration ofcxchanges or $raps which do not
involve cash. E.g.. state v. McDonald 88 Ariz l, 352 P2d 343 (1960); Department of
Business & Econ. Dev. v. Baumann. 56 lll. App. 2d 3e.,308 N.E2d 580 (197a); Hay v.
Boggt. 77 Wash. 329,137 P. 474 (7974); City of Cheyenne v. Frangos. 87 P.Zd SOa (Wyo.
1971). In addition, unlike actual cash sales priceg appraised valuations of one property may
not be utilized to estab[sh a value for other reat estare. Sce c.RS. $ 39-1-103(5)(a).r'
The plaintifFs allege other injuries in fact, including (a) damages which will be
Service appraisal was used as a basis to establish assessed valuation, it woutd adversely
impact the tom's ta:r base. This adds nothing to the plaintiffs'position regarding standin&
The affrdavit of the the appraiser for the Eagle County assessor comes somcwhat closer to
the nark by stating that the appraised value of the lodge Parcel "is one fasto/'which would
be taken into account for arrMng at actual value for assessment purposes. Howorer, the
matters to be considered for determining actual value for tax purposes are set by statute in
colorado, and are not left to thc discretion of the county t$( assesson. c.R.s. g 39-1-
103(5)(a) expressly prwides that value shall be based upon the cost approach, the market
approach and the income approach. As indicated in the toa, infra. these appraoches do not
permit the consideration of exchange transactions. Furthermore, the afFdavit of Jody
Caruthers, the Eagle County Assessor, attached to the Federal Defendant's reply brie[ states
9"t tt q 1989 full year fair market value for the l-odge Parce[ as set by the assessor, uras
53'606'760' and that, in fact, the assessor did not take zoning into account in arriving at thir
value. It is, therefore, clear that neither the 'raluation nor the reasoning of the Forest
Service appraisals played any part in the assessor's valuation for toc purposes.
t' Prior to 1983, c.R.s. $ 39-1-103(5)(a) did permit consideration of "rrnoqm or
recognized rralue" of other properties and nappraisal value for loan p-urposes on mmparable
properties" in setting actual value for ta:r assessmcnts. The statute nas amended in 1983 to
limit the valuation methodolosr to the tradional three approaches to value; namely, cos!
income, and market data or comparable sales.
sustained by relocation of Mill Creek Road; (b) injury to the sceniq recreational, and wildlife
values of the lndge Parcel; (c) reduction in the value of the lodge Tower condominiums
by development of the adjacent lodge Parcel; and (d) an adverse impact on the
environmental values within the town of Vail. while these averments may well satisff the
injury in fact rcqutement for Article III standing, thcy have no nexus to the zone of interests
sought to be promoted by the equal value prorrisions of FLPI\,fd Thus, they fail to meet the
test for standing under the Administrative Procedure Act See Data Processing Service
Organizations. Inc. v. Cramp. 397 U.S. 150 (1970).
Since none of the plaintiffs' alleged injuries futfill the dual criteria for standing to
13i5s shims relating to violation of FLPMAT equal valuation provisiory the Federal
Defendants are entitled to judgnent as a matter of law on the second and fifth claims for
reliel and I so recommend.
D. The Third Oaim for Relief (Failure to Comply with NEPA)
The 1986 EA analped three alternative cou$es of actio& one of which involved an
orchange offederal for nonfederal lands. The EA assumed that one of the properties to
be exchanged out offederal ownenhip was the lodge Parcel. The conclusion reached in
the EA was that the environmental effects of the proposed land exchange would be
insignificanr Although the final Decision Notice approving a land exchange @N(a) and
the Forest Sewice's final FONSI were not issued until November 8, 1983, they were
premisgd on the 1986 EA which was never amended or supplemented.
Plaindtrs claim that the 1985 EA was deficient in that (a) it was predicated ori a use
26
for the Lodge Parcel which was later rcjectcd by thc agency isetf; (b) it failed ro take into
account the environmeirtal cffccts of rclocating Mill Creek Road; (c) it improperly assumed
that any identifiable adverse environmental conscqucnccs muld be adequarcly mitigarcd
through regulation by the torvn of Vail; (d) reasonable altcrnatives to the exchange of thc
l.odge Parcel were not considered; and (e) inadequate consideration *.as gl"en to the the
cumulative impacts of the Forcst Scrvice land Adjusment Program. The Federat
Defendans have moved for summary judgment sn thir clain, asserting that thc
administrative record reveals no dcfisiencies in thc Eid
The National Environmentat Policy Act has dual aims First, it reguires the agency
to consider every sigrificant environmental impact of a proposed action. Second, it obligates
the agency to inform the public that it has aken into account environmental concems in
connection with its decision Baltimore Gas & Electric C,o. v. Natural Resources Defense
Council. Inc., ,162 U.S. 87 (1983). NEPA does not elevate environmental concems over
other objectives. It simply mandates "that the agency take a'hard look'at the cnvironmental
consequences before taking a major action. The role of the courts is simply to ensure that
the agency has adequately considered and disclosed the environmental impact of ib actions
and that its decision is not arbitrary or capricious.n Id. at 97-98.
An agency is required to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (Etq if it is
proposing major federal action which has a sigrrificant impact on the environmenl fu
Club v. Hodel.848 F.zd 106E (10th Cir. 19SS). The applicable regulations requirc an agency
to list those actions which normally require an EIS and those that do not require either an
27
EIS or an EA 40 CF.R. $ 1501.a(a). ln situations not encompassed within either caregory,
the agency first prepares an E4. 40 c.F.R. $ 1501.a(c). If the EA indicates that the
environnental effects will be insubstantial, the agency issues a FONSI. 40 c.FR.
$$ 1501.a(e) and 1508.13.
It is the agency, not the court, that is to take the'hard look'at environmental effects.
The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency. Kleppe v. Sierra Club. 427
U.S. 390 (L976). The decision of the agency that is action will not have a sigrrificant
environmental impact may be overturned only if it is arbitrary and capricious. Marsh v.
Oregon Natural Resources Council. 490 U.S. 360 (1989); Village of lns Ranchos De
Albuoueroue v. Marsh. l992wL 21811 (10th cir-, February 71,1992). "If tbe record before
the agency does not support the agency action, if the agency has not considered all relevant
factors, or if the rwiewing court simply cannot evaluate the challenged agency action on the
basis of the record before ig the proper course, orcept in rare circumstanc€s, is to remand
to the agency for additional investigation or explanation." Florida Power & Ught Co. v.
Lrribn. 470 U.S. 729,74 (1935).
As previously discussed in Section I(A) of this Recommendation relating to the Forest
Service's public interest finding the 1.986 EA analped the environnsata! impact of
transfering the Indge Parcel out of federal ovmership based upon an assumed future use
for development of hotel accomodations. As the Forest Service recognized in its November
1, 1988 appraisal" development of the lodge Parcel as a free standing hotel was
economically and phpically infeasible, and any hotel or other comnrercial use of the
28
ProPerty was politically unlikely, given thc position of thc town of Vail regarding such
development The Forest Service's official position from the time of the 1988 appraisal
through the final administrative appeal was that the most probable future zoning for the
lndge Parcel would be primary/secondary residential. In addition, the property was
appraised upon the assumption that it would be utilized for dwetopment of one or two
residences. The failure to consider the environmental impact of what tbe Forest Service
iself believed was the most probable futurc use of thc subject property was arbitrary and
capricious.
Upon reaching the conclusion during the appraisal process that the most probable
use of the I-odge Parcel would not be for hotel accomodations, the EA should have been
revised to take into account this change in the Forest Service's position Such an approach
would have been entirel;r consistent with intcrnal Forcst Scrvice instnrctions, as contained
in the Land Acquisition Handbook (FsH 5409.13 $ 363(1), which provide that',[tlhe
appraisal may necessitate rerrision in the EA or EIS.' It would have also ftrlfilted the
mandatc of NEPA that the agency take a 'hard look' at the reat environmental impact
associated with its action.
For similar reasons, the Forest Service's failurq to take into account the effects of a
potential relocation of Mill Creek Road was arbitrary and capricious. The 1986 EA uas
prepared based on an assumed devclopment plan which did not contemplate the relocation
of the Mill Creek Road right-of-way. Indeed, it was not until the finat decision notice was
29
issued on November 8, 1988 that the matter of road relocation was considered"'! DN(4)
expressly gave LPI the right to relocate the right-of-way casement for Mill Crcek Road at
its expense. (VoL fV, p.2).
The Forest Service has never considered the environmental impact of moving the Mill
Creek Road right-of-way or the alternatives available to lesen any adverse environmental
consequences which might flow from such relocation. The Federal Defendant's contention
that aay relocation would have a de minimus effect is inadeguate. Such a decision Eust rest
with the agency after it takes a 'hard look' at the issue. It is not a matter to be addressed
by the courl See Florida Power & Lieht e.o. v. Lorion. 470 U.S. 729,744 (19SS).
For these reasons, I conclude that the Federal Defendants are not eDtitled to a
judgment as a matter of law on the thhd claim for relief, and recommend that their Motion
for Partial $rrmm6sy Judgment be denied as to this claim.!
m. THE PL{INTIFFS'MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMIVIARY JUDGMENT
.{. Second Claim for Relief Failure to Properly Appraise the Lodge Parcel)
For the reasons previously stated in Section II(C) above, the Plaintifh lack standing
s The matter of relocation arose because the oristing Mill Creek Road right-of-way
would have to be moved in order to accomodate a subdiviJion of the Lodge Pariel for thi
dwelopment of trro single-family dwellings. The fact that the final decision notice
authorized relocation of the right-of-way is yet another indication that the perceived most
probable use had changed between the date of the 1986 EA and the November & 1988
decision notice.
D For purposes of disposing of the Federal Defendants' motionTor summary judgncnt
on the third claim, there is no need for me to consider the other alleged deficiencies in the
EA raised by the Plaintiffs. However, thesc will be discussed in relation to the Plaintift'
Motion for Partial Summary Judgmeng j4ftq.
30
to raise an allegedly improper mluation under FLPlvlA's exchange provisions. Thus, thc
bases for Ey recommendation that thc Federal Defendans'Motion for Partial g'mms1y
Jurlgment should be granted on this claim also dictate that the Plaintiffs'Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment should bc dcnicd.
Even if the Plaintifh'had standing to seek rwiew of the naluation process emplopd
by the Forest Service in connection with the l-odge Parcel, the administrative remrd fails to
establish that the procedure or nethodoly employed was arbitrary and capriciors. Thc
Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Iand Acquisitions (Uniform Standards"), adopt
the generally accepted definition of fair market value; namely, what a tnowledgeable willing
buyer under no compulsion to purchase would pay in cash or terms equivalent to cash to a
knowledgeable willing setler under no compulsion to scll (Vot. M p. 3aSZ). In
determining what a willing buyer would pay, the appraiscr must look to the highest a best
use to which the property could be put under existing zoning. (Uniform Standardq Vol. M
p. 3a5G). An cxception to this principle is made if thc appraiser concludes that there is a
reasonable possibility of a zoning change. In such a sinntion, the property should not be
appraised as if the zoning change has alroady taken place, but rather the porcntial
modification of zoning should be taken into account to tbe extent it affects the cash
. consideration which the hlpothetical buyer would be willing to pay. (Uniform Appraisal
Standards, vol. [V, p. 3a5G). See also Forest Service Appraisal Handboo! FsH-54@.12
$ 133d.
Where the subject propcrty is being conveyed out of federal owncrship and into
37
Private ownenhip the land must be appraised based upon its probable zoning and value
once it comes into private hands. Id. This guideline is entirely consistent with the concept
of fair market value. A hypothetical privatc willing buyer presumably will not continue to
employ the subject property for the existing Forest service useg. and hence, the
consideration he is willing to pay will bear little relationship to the value of the land
premised on its historical use I the Forest Service.
The Forest Service appraisals of the l,odge Parcel fully complied with the mandates
and guidelines of the Uniform Appraisal Standards, the Forest Service Appraisal Handbook,
and generally accepted appraisal procedures. These appraisals considered the highest and
best use to which the property could be put, the existing zoning, and the reasonably
possibility of a change in zoning to accomodate a use more consistent with the parcel's
development potential. Based on these considerationg the appraisers concluded that the
most probable zoning of the lndge Parcel once it came into private hands would be
primary/secondary residential. While one might disagrce with the conclusiong tbey certainly
caDnot be deemed arbitrary and capricious.
The Plaint'fFs asscrt that the procedure adopted by the Forest Service appraisers
violated tbe instructions issued by the Chicf of the Forest Service. Specifically, they note
that the Chieidirected that the Lodge Parcel be appraised "as ifzoning and potential zoning
is similar to that existing on adjacent or nearby similar priuate properties.'r (vol. M p. a33).
PlaintifB further point out that the zoning on adjacent private lands is commereial and high-
denisty multiple fumily.
32
To the extent that the Chiefs instructions can be read as requiring an appraisal of
the l,odge Parcel premised on commercial or highdensity multiple family use, it is
inconsistent with the concept of fair market rralue, and does not comply with the
requirements or suggestions contained in the Uniform Appraisal Standards or the Forest
Service Appraisal Handboolct Neither the Ciriefs instructionq nor the opinion of thc
Rwiewing Officer guestioned the Forcst Service appraiscrs'conctusions that once in prirrate
hands, the highest zoning reasonably probable would be primary/secondary residential.
Under these circumstances, an arbitrary mandate that the lndge Parcel should valued as if
it were zoned for commercial usc would do violence to both the concept of fair market value
and the purposes underlying the egualization of value called for by FLPlvfA"a
B. Third Oaim for Relief (Violations of NEPA)
,o In dl probability the Chiefs remarks concerning the zoning of adjacent land werc not
geanJ to preclude the Forest Service appraisen from following the Uniform Appraisat
Standatds or the Forest Servicc Appraisal Handbook Ccrtaintn if the appraiscrs'
investigation revealed that the lodge Parcel would be zoned similar to surrbunding
properties, thcy would haw been under an obligation to value the parcel as if that zoning
was already in place. Howwer, once the appraisers determined that the Irdge Parcel rvould
Prgbably not be zoned commercial or high-density residential they wre clearly obligatcd to
value the ProPerty based on their opinion of the most lftely zoning which would be assigned
to the Property in private hands. It should also be noted that neither the reviewing
appraiser, nor the Accoiate Deputy Chief who handled the appeal suggestcd that there was
any conflict bctwecn the Chiefs instructions and the appraisal procedure employed by thc
Forest Service appraisers.
a Valuing property for commerciat or high-denisty residental use wher4 in fact, thc most
prohable future zoning is primary/secondary residential would effectively preclude any
exchange under the prorisions of FI-PMA Given the cquatization riandate of FLPIrd.Ar no
reasonable person would ever consider making a substantial paymcnt to equalize vatue when
the value of the parcel sought to be acquired was premised on a use not feasible rmdcr
probable zoning.
JJ
For the reasons set out in section II(D) of this Recommendation, I find and conclude
that PlaintifB are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on their third claim for relief
alleging violations of NEPA Specifically, those violations consist of (a) the failure to assess
the environrnental impact of the exchange bascd upon the assumed use deemed most likely
by the Forest Service itself in light of probable zoning restrictions; and (b) the failure to
consider the emrironmental impact of a relocation of the Mitl Creek Road rightof-way, even
though such a relocation was permined at the discretion of the transferee.
The Plaintiffs have also raised additional grounds for their position that the 1986 EA
and the Forest Service FONSIs were arbitrary and capricious. They claim that (a) the EA
did not address alternatives to tbe land exchange and road relocation; and (b) the EA failed
to take into account the cumulative effects of this and other land exchanges. If find no merit
to either ofthese contentions. The 1986 EA did discus three alternatives; an orchange of
Federal lands, including the lndge Parcel for the Wildernes Parcet; a corweyance by sale
or under the E:rchange for Schools Aa of three parcels to the town of Vail; and taking no
action. The Plaintiffs state that the EA should have also considered acquisition of the
wilderness Parcel through outright purchase or by eminent domain. The Federal
Defendans respond that Congress bas not appropriated funds for such purposeq nor has
congress specifically authorized the use of condemnation power. 16 u.s.c $ lra(c).
NEPA and the regulations promulgated thereunder only require that reasonable
alternatives to the proposed action be evaluated. E.g.. Headwaters-Inc. v. BIJVf. Medford
Districl 914 F.2d 1174, 1180 (9th Cir. 1990). Furthermore, the range of alternatives which
34
must be consideted in an EA is less comprchensive than in an EIS; State of North Carolina
v. Federal Aviation Adm., lW2 WL 31178 (4th Cir" February 24, l{Il)); Coatition on
Sensible Transp.. Inc. v. Dole. 826F.2d 60, 66 (D.CCir. 1987). As the United States C.ourt
of Appeals for the Second Circuit has statcd: "[I]t remains something of an anomaly to insist
that an agency assess alternatives for an astion that it has detcruined will not have a
'significant' effect on the environmene' Citv of New York v. United Sates Dept. of Transp,
775 F.2d,731 7u (2d Gr. 1983), cert denied. 465 us. 10s5 (1984). see atso otmsted
7% F.Zd nt, ZN (Sth Cir. 1980. I
conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the failure of the 1986 EA to consider
alternatives which could not be effectuated without Congressional appropriation or
delegation of eminent domain power wat not arbitrary and capricious.
Forsimilar reasons, I conclude that the EA's discussion of cumulative effects was not
arbirary or capricious. Essentially, the Plaintiffs complain that that atthough the EA dealt
with the cumulative effecb of outstanding exchange proposals, as well as proposals for
outright acquisition, it did not delve into the effests of.potential future orchanges for which
no proposal was actually on the table. Again, an EA is not designed to cxhaustively study
the cumulative effect of possible, but speculative, futurc transactions.
rv. TFIE PRIVATE DEFENDAI',ITS'MorIoN FoR suMMARy JIIDGMENTAI.TD
MOTION TO DISMISS
The Private Defendans have also moved for summary judgment on the grounds that
.:
Plaintiffs cannot attack the patent issued for thc lrdgt Parcet uniesi they assert a supcrior
'''iri
title theretq and that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider the claims ri::
.,'l
35
against them. The first of these arguments has already been considered and rejected in
connectionwith the Federal Defendants'Motion for Partial SummaryJudgment. Under the
sircumstances here presented, the issuance of a patent did not deprive the Plaintiffs of either
a right of action or a remedy under the Administrative Procedure Act See Donnelly v.
United States. 841 F.2d gffi, nZ n. 5 (9th Cir. 1988); National Forest Presewation Group
v. Butz 485 F.2d 408, 411 (9th Cir. 1973).
The Private Defendants' jurisdictional argument is likewise without merit ln a suit
for review of agency action under the Administrative Procedure Acg the court may assert
jurisdiction over any private parties who are necessary in order to afford full relief. Sierra
Club v. Hodel. 848 F.2d 7068,1077-78 (10th Cir. 1988)(ioinder of private parties appropriate
under F.RCP. 20). See also l-eague to Save l:ke Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning
Agencl'. 558 F.2d 914 (fth cir. 19Z)(oinder of private parties appropriate under F.RC.p.
19). Furthermore, to the extent that the Private Defendanb'position is predicated on thi
fact that they bave already received a patent, it must be rejected for the reasons stated
above.
Having disposed of the Private Defendants' contention that private parties cannot be
joined in an action such as this, I now turn to their argument that not enough priuate parties
have been joined.z Under F.R.CP. 19, a person must be joined, if possiblg when (a) he
claims an interest relating to the subject of the action, and disposition of the case in the
" I will treat the Private Defendants' Motion to Disrnis as a motion under F-R'CP.
12(bX7).
36
Person's absence would impede or imPair his ability to protcct his interesq (b) failure to join
a party would leave existing parties in a position of incurring double, multiple, or inconsistent
obligations; or (c) a person's absence would prcclude granting full relief to the parties
alrea{y Presenl No contention is made here that the failurc to join the formcr Wildcrness
Parcel owners would impair their ability to protect their interesq or that the existing parties
might be subject to multiple or inconsistent obtigations.Rathcr, the Private
Defendants argue that the absence of the foruer Wilderness Parcel onnen from the tawsuit
will make it impossible to afford complete relief.
The Private Defendants are correct that the entire exchange frnsaction cannot be
unwound without the presence of the former lVilderness Parcbl owners. However, this
observation, in itseE, does not compet the conclusion that their joinder is required under
Rule 19, or that the action should be dismissed for failurc o join them. Certainly, in the
event that the C.ourt ultimately orders a rcscission of the exchange, complete relief can bc
afforded to the Plaintiffs. Likewise, as to the Federal Defendantq the status quo ante can
be restored without joinder of additionat parties. It is only the Private Defendants who
smnot be placed in the same position thcy occupied prior to the ctosing of the exchanga
Rule 19 is intended to embody equitable principles. Britton v. Green. 325F.Zd3n,
382 (10th Cir. 1963). The Private Defendants apparently perceived that a speedy closing of
the exchange would provide somc insulation against the Plaintiffs' claims. Of course, the
disadvantage to such a procedure is that if it is not successful, full rcturn to the status ouo
ante might not be possible. These are matters which the Private Defendans should bave
37
weighed before agreeing to proceed with the exchange ctosing even though further fitigation
was a foregone conclusion in light of the vehiment objections vocied by Vait and other
parties during the lengthy administrative process. C.onsequently, I recommend that the
Private Defendants'Motion to Dismiss be denied.
V. APPROPRIATE RELIEF
The above desclibed failure ofthe Forest Service to propcrly consider certain factors
in its decision-making process flaws the EAr the FoNsIs, and the DNs. The appropriate
remedy in such a sih:ation is to remand the matter to the administrative agency with
directions to reconsider its public interest finding and its FONSI after taking into account
the most probable use of the Indge Parcel in tight of likely zoning constraints and the
impact of any relocation of rhe Mu Creek Road right-of-rvay. Florida power & Ught v.
Lorion 470 u.s. 729, 744 (19s5); sierra oub v. Hodel. 848 F.2d 106s (1&h cir. 19Bs).
Since there are claims still outstanding not resolved by this recommendatioq and in order
to avoid piecemeal consideration by the agenry, remand should await completion ofjudicial
review regarding the remaining clains.
Based on the foregoing I hereby RECOMMEND that the Federal Defendants'
Motion for Partial SummaryJudgment be GRANTED IN PART AI{D DENIED IN PART.
Likewise, the Plaintiffs'Motion for Partial Summary Judgment should be GRANTED IN
PART AI{D DENIED IN PART. The Private Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment
and Motion to Dismiss should be DENIED.
38
oatea tshi/ aayof Marctr, 1912
Uuited States Magistraa Judge
39
TO:
FROI'I :
DATE:
SUBiTECT:
a t the Lodge South Conctominj,um Builcting.Applicant: Lodge South Condominium Association
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The Lodge south condominium Associatron is requesting to add a 96foot eleva tor adctition (E.1. square f eet,l on the east sicte of theirexisting buitctrng- rn order to construct this prolectT a helghtvariance and common area square footage variance are necessaiy.
This bullcling is a regar non-contorming structure. The Lodgesouth bur.lding is toca tect in the commercri.l core r zone distri;t
'hich has a height maximum of 4J teet for 4ot of the buitcring and3J teet for b(JB ot the builcting. The todge south ctoes notcontorm to either of these height consicreratrons. rn fact, mostof the Locrge is over tr.ro times as high as the maximum height ot43 teet. The erevator will be usecr as a servi ce el.eva tor ancttheretore needs to provide access to all. of the 6 stories of thebui. lcling- The proposecl eleva tor \^ri.lr.r ma tch the highest exrstrngroot rtdge ot 96 teet.
In Commercial Core Ir 20t ot the allouecl GRFA for the property
Common af eas i nc I rlde hal lvayS,
ncl common enc.l osed+common close ts, lobby a
can be considered as common area.
gcrea ti ona es. The allolred common areE
LODGE SOUTH
Totaf Si.te Area:.3350 acre or 141593 sf
Site Coveraqe:
teet. The -6rffig-Eommo n area is 't ,249 square teer. wrth theadoition of the proposed elevat,orr the burlcrrng r.rourd be 4r995square teet over the a r.r orred common area square footage. For
;l1:_^."_u^"^on-.? common area variance ls also berng requestecr.Please see the tolrowing zonlng statrstrcs i"i ini, buirdlng:
Atleued An t
(Please note site coverage inc.tudes builttingE, grounctpatios and decl(s unjess otherwise specitred in the urbanGuicle Pla n. )
d-tstwe ktq
fiffi;nzr
(AUt ot totalsite area,|
Al Iowect
Existing
EI e va torrotat exi.sEffl
Rema rning sf
Al loued
Existing
Over allowed
I!tb'|4 sf
lIr542 sfgt sfrT]ffi twith efevaror)
5.1. st
t t ,6'14 sf
57 1526 sf
451852 sf
Ievel
Desrgn
GRFA:
PEC . !) -5-
I
5.uest for teri or alteration in0r lhe Lodge at Va ppl icant:ropertr es
6. Request for an amendment to the icipal code in order to add ]ow !,suDscrrption r o tac ties under condi ti ona uses in
-.-"'""--'*-orcier to adci an entry to the west side
Kristan Pritz showed site plans and elevations and explained the request. Sheadded that the staff recommended approval . Donovan was concernea dnat the lirgeevergreen_be protected' and Pritz answered that she had been assured by the appiicantthat the large evergreen would stay. Jay peterson repeated ttrii asiuiini.. ---'
Rapson asked about the purposi of chaning the entrance, and Jay stated that it wasto facilitate the flow of traffic.
R?pson moyeg ?nd=viele seconded to approve the request per the staff memo. Thevote was 6-0 in favor.
ma ndaenti a'l a nt
canE:
Wherry poi nted out thatAfter more discussion,
cul tura and oDencatlons, Inc.
his needs were very
Rick Pylman explained the request and added that the staff recorrnended approvalof only the changg il !1," Agricurturar and 0pen spiie-riistrict and thereforerecommended denial of the-proposal as submitted. Steve l{herry, the app.l icant,gave his reasons for wanting the rezoning. The Foreit-service site which hiscomPany had been using could not be used any longer- aob'ioote oi-il,e Firreiiservice stated that the Forest service hao.ittilil {l,.i"v io r,ru. a temporaryuse pernit but would not be able to renew it. He aaoea inii ilre Foreit'5e"vice
did have an area designated for this use on Vail Mounta'in. ltheffy stated that thislocation would not woik for his business. Ihe!fv aiiJ-iir,"o if 6;;i;-d;-; -
variance and was told that there was no such thi-ng-ai-a-ifI-variance. patten statedthat al'l conditional uses in-the Primary/Secondar! ion" Jiit"ict were pruiil uier,and.to.add-a private use would be a basiardizatio-n oi tni'iining coo.;'-onii i--conditional use is in the code, it is very difficult to iurn oown.
Donovan felt that the Forest Service was.shirking their duty an<t should allowthe use on their land...patten replied that the Forest service poiiiv wai'io"alt9mpt to e'liminate.this type of servjce. He added ttrii ttre siarr iouio worfwith the Forest Service in air attempt to addrisi ou""iii-ui.r in the MasterPlan and spread out the responsibility to provide uses.
Briner moved andinvolvinq only the
uonovan voti ng agai nst.
7.uest for a si covera variance jn order to build a on Lot 4ocl( U, Va t I Ri dqe vIston. AppIIcant: Mike Baskins
different from other radio signa)s.on seconcieci to approve the request
Tom Braun showed site plans and elevatio_ns and explained the request. He statedthat the staff felt that the location of the gurale was tlre-most-iogicar-one----
9l^!!.,]9t and the..garage size was not excessive.- The staff recomm6nded approval.Air:!91' dlscussion'=viel-e-qrovgg qno_Rqpso_n seconded to app"ouel_!e__reg.ge.!.!._pLi-.the s:aff memo. The vote w
.l oca ted nex t tr.l="J:o *nexc _c, :n proposed eleva tor. Tinergnt - t- ha-t--Jarfur"E_be tr4eell U5 and AU f eet.
:h ; .alr toveLhas a
The eteva tor shoul d
he proposed
ch tn llost
' s op j. n1on,
not greatty change the situation on this portion of thebu:,.lcling. The actctition greatly change the buiovera I I imetevat6aa;as ti-crease rhe size of the bu n9 whi
exr s ti ngdoes not
ca ses i s a.l rea dy too large f or the site.
impacts on
In stattthe addltion has minimal negative the usess ln
Common Area Variance:
Wr
l1
l^iah
+t'1'Yldt'$'
na-tntal-n@on.rh
common area to this property has no negative impactc on existingor pbtential uses and struciures in the vicr.nrty.
T he p-Eep_ose_d_ele va -to
The deqree to lrhich relief from theand ent orce
achleve uni foe vlctn
ant of s ege.
Common Area Va ria nce:
rs still
inte reta-
o
s tn
Heiqht Variance:
It voulcl be a grant 9t speci,al prrviJ.ege to af.Lon the heightvariance. rt is certain.ly truE trrit trre existing building,ii alegal non-contorming use due to the fact tha t it hras consEructeclunder a different type of zoning. vail has rnany buildings whichfal"l e1 thin this citegory. The proposeo height ot 96 teet isover twice the maximum height of 43 teet a.lr onecl uncter thecurrent commerciar core r zoning. To approve such a great heightvariance rroul.d be a grant of speciat privi.tege.
once agalnr many bui lctrngs in vait are over their alloerect GRFAand common a rea aJ.l owances. To approve the adctitional commonarea ot El. square feet would increise the t,otar amount over the'al.l-owed common area to 4tgg5 square f eet. To approve the additiSD-al El square feet ot common area rrouJd Iprivileger as fr6-st- o the same gquare footaprootems have not be c
The effect of the requested va r 1a nce on liqh ano a r, distributionoI popuj'a t Oll r tra nspor ta ti on ano tratti c faci litiesr DubIic
a c:. l r ties and utrliti.es, anA ubJ i c saf,etv.
Heiqh t Va ri a nce:
This variance will have some impact on light and air in that thesi,ze of the shadow cast by the stairwell will be increaaed
ih&ddd \
Total exlsting 'l ,3Ju at
f ota.l over allowed ( includingelevator, 41995 sf
Densi ty
Common Area
(GRFA allowed zut,
AJ lowa bl e DU's:
Exrsting DU's:
AJ ioweo
Exrsting
EIeva tor
a
42
21335 sf'l ,249 afat sf
wlth New El eva tor:96 tt
94.5 tt
9t ft
2.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon revi elt ot qriterra and F]'ndrngs, Section tE.62.06(J of theMun]'c o the peoarEment of communrti DEvEl6 nt recommenddenlae hergnt vartance ano Oenr.a.t e conmon a rea
t--,..:/'rne r.elalronsh
I poEentral uses and structures 1n the vicinil
to other exi.stin
Heich t Variance:
The additrona.l height ot the elevaany actlacent properi tes. An exis
tor shou-td
ting starr
not grea
tower a
try
I rea).NA
tr{\)'^t-9
4tY
$,Yxr
.21
^q-c"I
*t.ton. Allowed3
Approximate Existing
l6t ot exlstrng root61t of exrsting roof
I6t of existing roof
5t of existing roof2t ot exr,sting root
Proposect e.levator 96 f t high:
Revrsed Height Brea kdown23t ot exr.st,ing root6lt ot exrsting roof
l6t or exrsting roof
1. up to but qt the buildlng may be buittto a height of 33 tt or less.
Not more than 4Or ot the builcting may behigher than 33 ftr but not higher than43 tt.
Hei ght s:
96 tt94.5 ft9J ft
EE ft
E5 tt
gf_enge !eted upon ihe folLor"rinE--iEcffi
inpa ct
STAFF RECOMMEND; 'O['
---
The statf believesfron this proposat.
be a grant ot speciaono
ei"Eher-vE;ia;a;-.
tha t, there
Howeverr
are
the
ho:rct-eaf signiticantstatf feels that rt impa c ts
woul d
oerriafoiiTl?bo For this
reque9 ts.
eprimary F€6sonr Btatt mus! recommenct
t*lo 5q f*pJl -liloo I
due to the e ional
e.leva tor aclcli tiorr ui.tJthi.s area.
height of the t Inot clisrupt the t.r.ow
;ed eleva tor. The
of trattic througrr
Common Area Va ria nce:
The a ddi. ti ona J A t trilI hav me im
there a re opent ng-e east end of t,hebe blocked by the e-leva tor actdi t,ion. f he
wi I I no effect on eclestrlan or a uto trafti.c-
on the o
hallway which lJill noqt
a dcli ti ona I common area
r rs noc a-rffisize of Ehe en e covere
s a oblem..
RELATED POLICIES IN VAIL'S COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN
Not applicable.
Such other factors and criterra as the
n each floor of the
omml ss 10 deems a Jicableto the orooosed variance.
FI ND I NGS
issron shal-t make the f ol.lor.rintln!!!Lngs before qrantinq a varlance.
That the grantj.ng of the variance sill notspecial privilege inconsistent r{i th theproperties classitied in the same dj.strrct.
Tha t the granting of the variance rriI.l. no!public health, satety, or weltare, or maproperties or improvements in the vicinity.
constieute a grant ofl imi ta tions on other
be detrimenta I to theterral.ty J.nlurious to
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the foltowinq
rea s on s:
The s.trict or Jrteral interpretation and entorcement of thespecified regulation wouJ d result in practical. difficu.lty orunnecessary physi.cat handship inconsistent with the oblectrvesot this title.
There are exceptions or extraorctinary circumstances orconditions app.ticable to the site of the variance that donot app-ly generalty to other properties in the sane zone.
The strict or .literal interpretation and enforcement of thespecified regulation wou.td deprive the app.ticant of prrvilegesenJoyed by the owners ot other properties ln the samedistrl ct.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJEET:
p.lann.- ,i I Environmental commisl
Communi ty. Development Department
August 12, l985
In
b-
pEscRrprroN oF REQUEST SuttritE rt5y1Tlg
The Lodge south condominium Assocratron is reguestrng to adcr a 96
-foot hj.oh elevator tower to the east sicte of the Lodge Sou€ticondominium bui.rding. Totar sguare footage for the elevatoradclrtlon ig 8l .<duare feer. The elevator wi. ll extend up to theath story ot the buil0rng. The elevator lJitt be usecr primarl.lytor servrcing the 42 exrsting condomini ums.
LODGE SOUTH
Total Site Area:
Sr.te
(80 r
si te
ot tota.t
area J
.335U acre
Al lowed
Existing
Eleva torTotal existing
Remaining sf
or 141593 st
ttr6'14 st
11r542 sfaI sf.llr623 sf (with e.leva tor,
tPlease note si
Pa ti os and ctecks
Guide Plan. J
GRFA:
Densi tv
te coverage inclunless otherwi se
5L sf
udes bui.ldings, ground .leve.l
specrtrect in the Urban Design
\// Common Area
)fi iEFa-TE;eo
Al.Iowed lIt6'14 sfExisting 57 t526 sf
Over allowed 45r652 sf
Allonable DU. s: aExisting DU's: 42
2(J\t Allorred 2r335 sfExisting 't,249 sf
Eleva tor Bt sf
Total existing '/1330 sfTotal over allolred (includingetevator) 4,gg5 sf
Up to 6()t ot theto a height of 33
building may be builttt or .Iess.
t.
Not more than 4Ot ot the building nay behigher than 3J ftr but not higher than43 tt.
K..)$
A request for an extert or afteratron in order to add aneleva tor to the east side of the Loctge South builctj.ng.Applicant: Lodge South Condominium Association
Helght Allowed:
2.
Approximate Existing Hei ghts:
tbt ot existing6l t ot exr s t. jng
16t ot exrsting5t ot er(rscing2t ot extsE.ino
Proposed eleva tor 96
roo t
roof
roo f
roof
root
tt highs
96 tt
94.5 f t9t ft
E8 f tu5 tt
Revrsecl tseight BreaJ<dor.rn r^,1 Eh Neu EJeva tor:23t ot exrsting root 96 ft6lt ot existing roof 94.5 tt16t of existing roof 9.1 f t
*Prease note that lhe southeast corner of the elevator adclition(approximate-ry 9 st, encroaches on the Lodge at varl property.The app.trcant has provicrecr the enclosect letter fron the Loctge atVarl givj,ng their approval for the encroachmen!.
4t' tVL, t/rr*q+
al
: l:, ^: : ::... ^t:u :1 _-o_"_t-r_o
t-is
-
i _s € I e a r.l y a -t e sa I n on _ c o n f o r m i n e::..?:.u."..,yf:it _.o_lp"_recl^to the Commercrar Core r zontng ';"6;;;:
ment.s.Wr th respectstructurear
o@theteet. For this reasonreguest a common a rea va
memo.,
allor.red amount is equa.l tor it is necessary tor theriance tor th:.s propgsal.
4 t995 squa reappiicant to(See a ttachecl
buitcting
a ctua I ly
bui tcti ngproPosed
96 teet.linit otfor the
Under Conmercia.l Core I zonlngr the maxrmum he:.ght ot theis 43 feet. In adclition, only 4Ot ot the buitOing canhave a herght ot 4J teet. Th-e Lodge South conctoniniumhas a height range between 9b feet ancl 85 feet. TheeJeva tor .r.rould ma tch exactty the highes t, root ridge ofThe new root is over twice a! n:.gfr as the allowed height43 teet. Therdtorer a height- varrance js requiredaddr ti on.
II
q
I6.24.O10 purpose
The Commercial Core
and to mai.ntain the
commercia I area, wj.
establ ishments 1n a
I criscrrct is intended to.provide sitesunigue chara c ter of the ta i I Vi I la geth its mixture of lodges and commercialpredominantly pedestria n envi ronmen t.
purposes )arking, wafking or makj ll iveries.
B. !ehicle penetra tion
Appiicant: Not applicable.
Statt: This Desrgn Consideration's maJor emphasis is toreduce."auto penetration into the center of the village.,.The Lodge is organized in such a way that parking is locatedin the rnterior areas of the site. Thereforer -thrs DesignConslclera tton is not appticabte to thrs proposat. It shoutdbe noted that the erevator actctiti.on wirl decrease the entryLtay nolr going into the parking garage on the ground level oithe Lodge South building. An adequate openrng of LZ f__eerriJl rema in it theldctr tion islf
v
e Depa r Emen
umwrnfficiposar narntains thisvehi cl,e penetra tron shoutd notproposa l.
C. Streetscape F ra meuor.k
Not applicable.
S treet E n cl osure
or an access sray is lU feet.reguired width. Interior
be actversely attected by thls
D.
--r^lra
and statt: This consrctera tion sta tes that ,,an
enclosure is most comfortable when its walls are1f as hiqh as thectosed.'.The extEEiE nclosure of
Applicant
ex terna I
a ppr
erGfi
9 rea ter
proposed
and the Lodge South Towersthan l:1. This ratio rriitel eva tor addi tion.
space between theis currently anot be a f tected
Lodgeratioby the
F. Street Ecloe
APplicant and statf: The addition wilr provide more interestand. i r-regutari ty to the building edge and facade of theeast eleva tion-
G. Buitdinq Heiqht
Applicant: The Lodge South Touer Condominiums is currentty
1-lol::gnforming buitcring tocated on the outer boundary oiEne comnerciar core r zone distrrct. rhe proposect eleva toradclj,tion is located internally on the Lodge at Vail. propertyat the east enct ot the Loclge South Tower condominiums.Although this tocation wirl cause the most impact to theLodge at vai.t, both the onnership ancl managinent ot theLo.d.gg strorgly approve of this addi tion. No request toradclrtional height is reguired since the proposed efeva toraddition is to be no higher than existing-po-rtions of thebuilding.
The commer rr rre r distrrct is inter. .d J ensure adequa te119htr air, open space, and other amenj,tres approprrate tothe permitted types ot burrcrings and uses. The distrrctregulatlons in accordance with th; vair virlage uii"n DesignGuide plan and Deslgn Consrderatrons prescrtbe site deve.lop_ment standards that are intendect to ensure the rnalntenanceand preservation ot Ehe tight,ty clustered arranfements ofbutlclings tronting on pectest,rian lrays and publj.c greenwatsrand to ensure continua tron of trre buirorng scate "no "rchit-ectura.l qua.lrties that distinguish the Vl.Ifage.
III.COMPLTANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUTDE PLAN F'OR VAIL VILLAGE
The Urba n Design cuicle pJa nproposals tor thj.s area .
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH URBAN DESTGN CONSTDERATIONS T,OR VAIL VILLAGE
eleva t"t .oo-i tiJr, "no thet aAaa ^h6 l ^.-^
rr cr lrlt Lflg::::::ill:I.:^:-".j-e_:-.ii" is presenriy used as a parr(ine
?Il":".r.::::_ o.._r-rl.:I_ ",r":, ano a pecresrrran wa.rkr.ray up rothe ski I j.f ts from the Lodge. The etevator adcti tion shhave ve
back closeTWeoestr . 'r nepresen t.t y use
cloes not ca.lI out any specific
The purpose of the comparison between the proposa l ano the De€ignConsldera t j.ons is to shor., how the new destgn strengthens ordetracts from the overarl intent ot the Desrgi considerat.ions.Be'low each consideration is the appricant.s response as well asthe statf 's response to that particutar item.
A. Pedestrranization
legJica19: The proposed eleva tor adcti tion wi.tl conr:.nue tocretine the estabrished separa tion between p.o".iii"ns andvehicre circura Eion along the east bulrcri.ng edge ano theLoclge pa rl<ing Iot.
staff: The ereva tor addrtron is rocated on the interior ofthe Lodge development. It is not close to a ma3or leOestrian
e-leva toEl for the
Statt: The apptrcant actually is reguesting addttionalheight as a greater portion of the buildlng wltt now be atthe maximum herght ot 96 feet. The exrstrng building hasonly 16t ot the root at 96 feer. With the elevator addition,23t ot the roof line vj,tl be at 96 teet. It is dililg]lE_Jo
,
;servt ce for the buildrng's 8 floors. The roof line will not
also where the present el.eva tor is located. As stated in- the Design Considera tion "The height critEra are intended
ex xrstin
to encourage height and rnassing variety and to discourageunif orm builcting heights a.long the street.'. It is staf f .s
opinron that the criterra cannot be apptied effectively tothis proposa.l. due to the f act tha t to have a usef ul eleva tor,it must service the I floors ot this exlsting building.Staff does teel that the Loclge South condominium builctingdoes require special consideration due to the exrstinghej,ght ot the building and purpose ot the service elevator.
Vr ews
Applicant: Neither establlshed view corrrctors nor streetscapevlews from pedestrian ways will be adverse.ly affected.
statt: Establrshect vierrr corrldors and vrews from pedestrlan
ways will not be adversely affected by this proposal. Vier.rsot the ski mountarn from the I-70 'and Frontage Road areasr.tilJ be af tected. The actditionat he j.ght of the eleva Eor
acldi tion wi-tl btock out a sma.Lt portion of the vler^r of theski mounta i n.
I. Service/Delrverv
Applicant: No impact.
Statf: All service and delivery areas are maintained giventhis proposa l.
S un./S hade
Applicant: The proposed elevator addition LriJI have insig-nltrcant effect.on the spring and fall shadow pa ttern overthe surrounding Lodge at Vail properties and parking lot.
Staft: The existing stair tower already casts shadovs intothe parking area belon. The proposect eleva tor will increasethe shadow pa ttern slightly. Howeverr the sun./shade criteria1s designed for the purpose of limiting shadow patterns on
acl ja ceht properties or the publ i c ri gh t-ot-way. rnJh-i.E-c?se, the ilevator a tion t{i.tl not affect adjacent proper-
,J.
,ties or pu gnt-ot=
Statf recommends approvat ol this proposal. It is fett that theproposar is either not applicable to the Design consideratlons oihas very little impactr -it any, on each consrcteratlon. Stattaiso teels t,hat some rerief must be given to tha "iri"t interpre-tation ot height considerations for ihis building due to the factthat it is a non-conformi.ng structure. staff recormenos approvar,ot the project, contingent upon the Fire Department anct pubJrcWorks concerns being addregsecl.
v.STAFF RECOI,I..ldNDATION
Fi re Department
J. Fire servi ce recalr wilr be reguired in.the ne' e.levator.
2- compriance with the vai.r Fire Departnent ararn systemwill be reguirect.
Publrc Works
'l' The ereva tor actcrl tlon must not change the ex:,sErngdrainage pattern on the property.
t)k Street Edse:
1/
Applicant and Staff:
There is no change in street edge,provides a jog in the facade linepoint in an area of high buildings
Lodge a :ai l -3- 8/12/85
except to the extent that the
which gives some interest and a
and parking.
The allowed height'in Comnpreialfeet. The canopy is definitely
aanopy
focal
I^
WtK{,4+
Staff recornends approval of this proposal . The project has an overa'l Ipositive impact when compared to the Urban Design considerations.staff feels that the entry addition and porte-c6chdre wiil qriattv Iimprove the appearance of the existing entry way. Staff reiommenis that ZUf,,the Design Review Board level , the applicant be required to prcvide I
some additional landscaping to replace several of the aspen Lrees thatwill have to be taken out due to the infill of the existing p]anter areas.
*S<y(".ea
,/ .F. Buildinq Heiqht:
L.i
Appl i cant:
The building height is well below what is allowed in Cormercia'l Core I.
Sta ff:
The height of the canopy is 23 feet.
Core I varies between 33 feet and 43
below these height rnximurs.
Views
Applicant and Staff:
No major views are affected. some of the condomin.i ums to the north of thecanopy may, have their views of the main Lodge_bui'lding b'lcicked. However,views of the ski slopes do not appear iq be-UloikeO. " - --"
Service and Deliverv
Applicant and Staff:
All service alleys are kept open and full access under the canopy forfire and emergency equipment is provided. Note that traffic int-o tne
Lodge will now be organized so that visitors entering the property willuse the south entrance on the parking lot and visitors exiting will usethe north exit.
WL Sun/Shade:
App'l i cant and Sta ff :
No adjacent properties are affected.
V. STAFF RECOM4ENDATION:
r4-r
G4.
Lodge at Vail -2- BILZ/BS
regulations in accordance with the vair vilra_ge urban design guide pranand design considerations-prescribe site aeuef-opreni"rilililo, that areintended to ensure the maintena.nce and-p"eservation ot itre-irgr,ttyct us tered arran gements^9 f bui r din gs ironting ir -pil.iiriui"u'v,
.nopublic greenlravs, and to ensure c6ntinuatid oi il;-b;;i;;il scare andarchitecturar qua'r ities that distinguiih tt,t vir iui.l'' ' 9 "'v
This proposal is in compliance with the intent of the zoning for theCommercial Core I district.
III.
N{
FOR VAIL VILLAGE
proposal does not "g]gt. to any of the sub-area concepts listed inurban design guide plan.
IV.VAIL VILLAGE
The purpose of the comparison between the proposalto show how the new design strengttr-ns-or detractsof the design considerations.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE AN DESIGI,I GUIDE PLAN
"This
the
and considerations isfrom the overall intent
A. Pedestrianization:
B.Vehicle Penetration:
Applicant and Staff:
No change occurs to what is
c.!!rcet Enclosure:
currently on site.
Appf icant and Staff:
This submittar has no impact on the pedestrianization of vair village.The area is currenty,useo ur . pi"rinj_tot, entry-.and-aeiiu""y a""..The canopv and the sirosequent i":"iiiiiig oi irittii"inilinies the experienceof the visitor to the. Lodge in itr.i-ir'" ."". is now covered when theguest unloads his or her iar.
Applicant and Staff:
There is no effect on_ street enclosure, as the parkingbordered by three to five-story UuiiJin6s. To a certainwill .create-a. pecestrian focus .no aiufit attention frombuilding heights..
lot is already
extent the canoovthe upper
T'NTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JTIDGE
T.JNITED STATES DISTRICT COTIRT
UM]ED STATES COURTHOUSE
DENVE& CO 8f.294
BRUCE D. PRINGIJ
Magistrate Judge
w2717
CERTMCATE OF T,IAILING
Civil Action No. 89 N 1098
:
I hereby certi& that a copy of the RECOMMEhIDAITON oF TTNITED srATEsIl'rAGrsrMrE JITDGE_qqfd March 30, rggl entered by Magistrate Judge Brucc D.
Pringle was mailed tbts w day of March, l9g\ to theiolloring persons:
Charles B. White, Esq.
Wayne F. Forman, Esq.
Andrew W.lcwr, Esq.
Margaret E. Porfido, Esq.
410 Seventeenth Street
22nd Floor
Denver, CO ffi202
Randall M. Livingston, Esq.
Jo-es S. Bailey, Jr. Esq.
One United Bank Center
1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 3800
Derwer, CO 80203
Jamgs W. Winchester, Esq.
Assistant United States Attorney
I:wrence A Eshvitll Esq.
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Kenton W. Fulton, Bq.
Deparrment of Justice
I-and and Natural Resources Dvision
General Litigation Section
P.O. Box 663
washingoq D.c 2w4+0663
-a''/4,;-v42;L,--,4-
Secreury tdMagistrate Judge Pringle
t()
T0: Planning anO Environmental Comnission
FR01'l: Cormuni ty Devel oprent Department
DATE: August 12, 1985
SUBJECT: A Request for an exterior alteration in order to expand the entry onthe west side of the Lodge at Vail
APPLICANT: Lodge Properties Inc.
r. THE PR0PoSAL q0 4, tJ,)etqB
The Lodge at Vail_.is requesting to expand their we-st entry by 90'rlru"" 0feet. They are also proposing-to add'a porte-cocn!"e-oiioit["#entrance. The roof ridge-of.the-porte-cochlre is 23 feet in trelghi.The following zoning statistics for the Lodge are iistea below:
LODGE AT VAIL
l'lAIN }'III{G 0NLY (Does not include North Hing, Arcade, Condos, Lodgeprorenade)
Total Site Area Lot A: 2.08g9 acres or 90,992 sq. ft.
Site C0verage: Allovlable: 72,794
1E0Z x ioET-site area) Existing:-iffi8l
(Please note site coverage includes buildings, ground level patiosand decks unless othenrrise specified in thi urdan Design euiae iian)
G. R. F. A.Al'lowab'f e: 72,794Existing: 19,192
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
ft.
,t-l I Y. t
Common Area: Allowable: 14,559(2EFIJ-I owed*-> GRFA) Existtng: -*2-515
New Total Comon Area
Including Entry -l#,JOF-sq. ft.
larkinq: Jh" existing parking is not decreased by this
One additional parking space is provided due to realiqninoparking layout adjacent to the porte-cochEre
proposa 1
the
II. C0l,lPLIAll'CE WITH THE'PURPOSE SECTIOH 0F CCI ZONE
Purpose: Section 18.24.010. The Conmercial Core I djstrict is intendedto provide sites and to majntain the unique character of the Vai'l Vi'liiqecommercial area, with its mixture of lodjes and comrnercjal estiblistrmeniiin a predominant]y pedestrian environrpent. The Commercial Cop I Oisiriitis intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenitiiiappropriate to the permitted types of buildings aird uses. The districi---
by arrd bt:t.rvccn tht: !64'',' .l)ro1rcr.t.jc,s, Inc:.,
("l'hc Cor'lroratiorr") ancl Llrc Toryrr of \rai1, a
( "'I'he Torvn'r ) ,
TJll ij A(jltljl,,irll,i,i'l' r-'n t.r:r't.tl i rr t.o t.h.i s tl I r .1' ,', 1', I f)83
il C()l ()rado (i(.)r'l)()l'il L icln,
Cr:lorado l\tun i t: i 1.lr I Corporl L i un ,
1. The Corporation is
.mentS located thereon \r,hich
("The'Lodge"). Being more
and containing 2.OgO.acres.
2. The Lodge is located within the CommerciaL Core.
of ttre Town of Va1l.
I NECII'ALS
the.Oivner of ccltain rcaL
are collectively knorvn as
particularly described on
prolrcrt y and 1m;rr.<:rve-
the l,odge at Vai 1
the attached BxhibiL t'Art
I Zone District
3. A dispute has arisen betrveen the Corporatj.on ancl the Town as
'to qiirether the zoning ordinances oI the Torvn woulcl allow the additlon of
34 uelv accorffnodation units and one dvrelling unit (collectivety referrecl to
^as "Units'!) to the Lodge
4. The dispute relates to whether certain of the drvelling units
of the Lodge Apartments condominiunrs located on a parcel of air space
above the real property owDed by the Lodge,.1s attributa.ble to the la.nd
owned by the Corporation itself
5. The parties now rvish to compromisc and settle all differences rvhich
remain between them.
II AGREBIUENT
NO'l? TIIERE FORE, the parties agree as follorvs:
1. The parties agree that the density control sectj.on of the zoning
ordinauce for Commercial Core I shall not prohibit the Lodge from building
the Units
2. Be{ore the Lodge shalL proceed with the construction of the Units
it shall be required to cornply with all thc appropriate or.clinances of the
Town and obtain permission lrom tlre appropriate boards and commlssj-ons of
the Torvn and rulthcr olrtain a1r rec1ui.1.ed aud nu"*""uty permits.
3. Slrould the Loclge go forn'ard with tlre crinstruction of the Units it
shall be lur'tlrer requiled to const.ruct er:plrurlecl conlerence and meetlng rc;om
facilities iu thc Lodge so that whcn such cripansion 1s conrpletc the Loclge
, ,*'j 4, Ht3>tll tVh 't"u
rill:! | I ('rrnl,;r tl t.r.rt.ir I (:(rtt l(,t.r.tr:(! :rrrtl trr(.r:1,.i tr;,, 1,1,1111 $ilritr:(f r,;lt !t.ir i:;
? ,'100 .l t:t:|. i.lr ,s izr.,r nlrl'tr ()r I r.:l;r-; ()J lvlr i t:tr olrr: r.rronr shltj I t:r,rr r ;t i
^ 9'll
0 , 0(t0 Fj(luii l"(: J ec L nror.c ()r.' -t(-,ss.'b347
' 4. The corPorat.i()lr slrall not illstjt.ul,e flny legaJ. ncti.)1 aga.inst 1l(:
'l'tlt','n concerning any of the clispu[ccl lssucs; sct.torth hereiu. The Lodge b],
cntcring into this Agreemcnt cloes not waive its rights to r.equest an adclitionar
six acsommodati.n units nor does the Town waive its rtght to oppose such
Tequest'.
IN WITT\ESS
day of
ITIIEREOT,the parties heve slgnecl thls Agreement tbis
, 1993.
THE LODGE PROPERTIES, INC.
TOII'N OF VAILA Colorado ilunlci.pal Corporatlon
t
:t l" J car; t
tt at lcar;l
by
ar
Tll:j AorruurliN't inrcrsd tnr' ur * {aa.y ol' Ae#-, 1983
,r1' rr||d butwcen tbo LodSo Propertlos, !nc. . a Colorado CorP(rro[lon,
."'/'hrl Cur1.'e511ion") rnd the To*n of Val1, I Colorldo l(unlc,pul Corgoratlon,
: "The Tutt'n" ).
. I RECITALS
1. The Cornoratlon i6 the Cnuuer cf err t a1n l'nr.l
rents loc|lted tlter€on rvhlch rre collect!.vely kno'xn lo
"The Loclge"). Belng mot'c pertlculrt;ly clr:scr'lbed on
rnd contalning 1.090 tcres.
.
Froperty 8nd hrp''19Y6-
the Lodgc at Vrll
thc tttachcd Exhlblt rrArl
2. The Lodge la located wt thtn f.he Corrrrrgrclal Core I zone DlBttlct
rf the Town of Vell.
3. A dlapute bss arleen botrveen'rbc Corpst'ntlon rnd the Town as'
o trhetlier ttre sonlng ordlnances of rhLr f6v::r uould allo$ the &ddltton o!
.l ner.r irccolnmod&tion unlts Rnd o!)'r ..Jpe) ltng unlt ( co1lectlvely rater'red to
s "Llni te" ) to the Lod8e
a. The dispute relatcs to $'heth€,r'c-'ttaln c,! the dwelllng unltr
'f the L.';dee Aperlments Condomj.ntunc llocr.ted un I pBrgel oI atr EPlee
.hove tUe real property owner! try t.he Lcds,'. 16 sttltbutable to tii tan,
iunRd bl, the Corporatlon lteel.f .
5. The partles now wish to conrl'r:lni--',r $:rri set?10 all dllferenioE
cllrain bettveen them.
T'llEnX fOnE, the pnrtles
Tlre partlee agree tbur
for Ccmmerclal Core t
II AGNDEUENT
trgl Eti ac f ollows:
[]r0 r1 ::i;ri 1: i' cS:.!!u.l
ntrni !. lirrt proh i.irl t
nectlon
tlre Lodge
ol t.he
f roln
zonlug
bulldt ng
Urr I ts
tlte
of
I
.400
ifi.s ,rRAir[ft 9-ii-9t-t,,l r,r.|,'Fhl r ,"JUa
,tI
--.jt!ttfF--
I
s.,111 l.ir J tr 1'uLitJ ct'll f ril'u'lt:(! :rnd
J rrr,.t ln aLy'n, Dot(? (tl lcrrlr rrf
s(Jrrtrc Jeot mor'c or 1o88.
4. The corporrtlon ehall not ,hsrt tliL" D.ri:}. I real lctl on egrlnBt the
r$o conggrnlng any of the dllrtruted ignu+s e;.'L tcr'-l- t:e"eln. Tlle 1ogtqe bJ
;!erlng lnto thlo 46reement doss no! rr.:rr': i1-r;rilir3g to requeB" Irr t,c,.i.'. 1j]lr*.r.
.)l !ccolnrhrrdatlon uDlt6 Dof doeg. thg T',-'qn riElvr.r .r f.l li8,ht to gppoS€. Brtch
iquFE!.
.
In $ITNBSS UIIEREOF, the parrlgE have elgne.l thls Agrcemcnt **, I t
,.
'y a Lr-."rtd, tr983.U
T'HE LCDi:L tnQPERTlES, lNC.
by
TUIiN OIT VAILa C:1or.r.tlo ltuniclpal Corporrt t on
Itlrt l. i rr[ ,'rrrrlll !riri.t:c Wlt i clt i|i Ut l0lrs l
rvhirlr rrtre r(r0in shol I .Crull nf n At lcrrrit.
ol{t)llanager
E . Drager,
re a ldent
,4
''/'/ /
/,r-. --/[,'fu--iliclrarc'! CapIan,
LyHiBiT. 'H''
THE IODCE APARIMEM CONDOMINIUM
EXHIBIT A.I
I.DGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPENTY OWNED
BY DECITRANrS AS OF DATE OF
A part of lota !, b, and c, Block 5-C' Vall Vlllage, Ftrst
Flllng, Corinty of Eagle, State of Colorado, oore partlcularly
descrlbcd ag followg:
Beglontng !t che Southresg corner of lot e, 8lock 5-C, Vall
vlllage, Flrat Ftllng; thence North 24'LL'O0'tscet a dlstance
of 119.67 fcet; r,hence North U'17tOO'tsast a dlet,ancc of
143.00 fcet to e potnt of cune; thence along a cunte Eo the
rlghc havlng r radlus of 96.00 fcet, t centrtl engle of
64'00t00tt, end an arc dtstance of L07.23 fcct to a polnt of
tsngent; ihence along satd cangenc Norch 79'17r00'lasc a
dtsteocc of 245,42 feet to e polnt of cunre; theoce along a
cutare to thc rlght havlng a redlus of 582.79 fcet, a ccntral
angle of 2'03'54", and an arc lcngth of 21.00 feet to a polnc;
rhence Sotrth l0'30r16'lact a dletancc of 369.21 fcec co the
South llnc of satd lpt t; thence South 89'44t00'1Jest and along
satd South llnc a dlatance of 490.63 feet to the pol.nt of
begtnnlng.
E x ll; BiT nBo
THE IOEE IPA TTGNT CONDOI.IINIUM
I.ECAL DESCBIPrION OF ISnIU TIINC
ThaE prrB of lptg a and b, tlock 5-G' Vatl Vlllrge Flrst Ft1lng,
Couocy of F.gh, Statc of.Golorado, oore parttcularly deecrlbed
aa folloa:
Cocnclng et chc So'ughreet corner of lae er Block 5-C, tald
Vall Vl,llegc Ftrrt Flltng3 chcnce N.24'llr00'ts. aod along the
Norttnrerc llnc of rald lot e, Dlock 5-C, 119.67 fcct; thcnce
N.U'lr'00'E. rnd rloog thc Nortlnrcag ltno of aeld tot a,
Block 5-C, 109.65 fccc to thr Snrc potnt of bcglnnlng; chcnec
N.D'17r00't. and aloog che Norttnrcet ltac of loc e, Block
5-Cr 33.35 feet to a point of cunre; thcncc along the North
llne of lot e, Block 5-C eod t cunte to the rtght havlng e
radlus of 96.00 fcet, a ccotral angle of 64'00'00t', an lrc
dtatancc of 107.23 fcet to e polnt of tangenc; BhGnec N.79'l7l
OO'8. and along thc North ltne of lot r, tlock 5-C1 and ilong
catd trngcnt, 245.42 fcec to a polng of cunc; thencc along
rhe Noreh llne of lpB b' Elock 5-C and t cuilG to the rlghc
hevtog e redlue of 582.79 fcct, e ccotral eoglc of 02'03t54",
En lrc dlstancc of 21.00 fcct co e polnti thcnc. S.10'30t16'ts.,
18.97 fcet; Ehcnce s.79'29r44'T.' 146.65 fcet; thcncc N.10'301
16'1.t., lji.OO feet; thence s.79'29'44'!.,29.85 feet; Ghbnce
s.lo'30t16'E., 6.00 fcec; thence s.79'29f44'T., 16.35 fcct,;
thence s.lO'30t16'1., 8.90 fcet; shcncc s.79'29r44't{., 8.35
feet; Bhcnce .S.lO'30t16'ts., 6.00 fect; Bhcncc S.79'29r44rT.,
167.81 feet to the tnre polnt of beglnnlng.
Extisir "c"
THE LOME APARTMEM CONDOMINIUM
EXHIBIT A.3
IICAL DESCRITTION OF THE SOUTH WING
oF THE CONDOHINIUM BUJIJING
(1) bgal descrlptlon of the northerly portlon of the eouch
wlng of the condooinlun bulldtrg (comonly referred to a8
the fourth floor of the condoolnluo bulldlng).
The alr Bpace above the clevatton 81191.62 feet above ran
sea level over thc followlng-deecrlbed property:
That parc of Lot a, Block 5-C, Vall Vtllage Flrer Flltng,
County of Eagle, State of Colorado, oore partlculrrly deecrtbed
ee follqrs:
Coroenclng at che Southrcac corner of Lot a, Block 5-C, aaldVatl Vlllage Flrsc Ftltng; thence N.24'll'00'b. and along the
Norttnrescerly llne of cald lot a, 8lock 5-C, ff9.67 feet;
rhence N.U'17t00'E. and along che Norttroesicrly llne oflor a, Block 5-C, f09.65 feet; thence N.79'29 r44'ts. , 15l.Blfeet to the tnre potnc of beglnntng; chence 5.10.30'16"E.,
44.30 feet; thancc S.79'29r44'1.t., 10.00 feer; thence S.10.30t
16"E., 40.70 feer; rhence N.79'29'44'8., 10.00 feer; thence
S.l0o30'16'ts., U.05 feet; thence N.79'29'44'E., 16.65 feer;
rhence N.10'30'16'1{., 2O.10 feet; thence N.79029t44,8., 90.25feet; thence N.10'30'16'T., 28.00 feet; therrcc S.79'29r44'!.,'
38.35 feet; thence N.10030'16'T., 57.95 feec; Chcncc S.79'29'44'T.,
8.00 feet; thence N.10'30r16'T., U.00 feet; thcnce S.79'29144'tt., 29.85 feec; rhencc S.l0'30r16'ts.r 6.00 feec; chcace
S.79'29r44'T., 16.35 feec; thence S.t0o30r16rE., 8.90 feet;
thence 5.79'29 t44'1t., 8.35 feet; thence S.10'30r16tE., 6.00feec; chence S.79'29r44'T.r 6.00 feec to the tnre polnc of
begtnnlng.
(11) Iegal &scrlpclon of the eouthcrly portl,on of the aouch
wtng of the condootntuo butldlng (cocoonly referred to aa rheflfth floor of the condoolnluo butldtng).
The alr space above the clevatton 8r2M.89 feet above Ean aea
level over che followlng-deacrlbed property:
That parc of loc a, 8lock 5-C, Vall Vtllage Flrar Flllng,
County of Eagle, State of Colorado, oore partlculrrly descrlbed
as follons:
Comnclng at the Souttnrest corner of lot a, Block 5-C, satd
Vall Vlllage Flrst Flllngi thence N.24'11r00'ts. and along rhe
Nortlnresterly llne of satd lot a, Block 5-C, U9.67 fect;
thence N.U'17r00'ts. and along the Norctnreaterly llne of Lot a,
Block 5-C, 109.65 feetl thencc N.79'29r44rts., 15l.El fecc;
rhencc s.10'30r16'ts., 44.30 fcet; thcnce s.?9o29'44'T., lO.oo
feer; rhence s.10'30t !5'ts., 40.70 fcet; rhence N.79'29i44'ts. ,
lO.O0 feat; rhencc S.10'30tl6r'E., 15.05 feet; rhence N.?9.29i44'E. U.65 fcet Co ghe CnrG polnt of beglnntng; chences.ln'Jor16'8., 84.70 fcec3 rhence N.79'29r44'ts., O.oO feer;
th..ncc S.10'30r 16'E., 66.10 feet; thence N.79'29'44"E. , 6.00feet; thcncc S.10'30t16'ts., 1.66 feet; thcnce N.89'44 rOO"E.,
24.44 fcct; thence N.79'29r44'8., 23.90 feet; thence N.1O'3Ol
16'T., 46.00 feec; thence N.79'29'44'ts., 9.30 feer; Ehence
N.I0'30t15'il., 130.80 feet; shence S.79'29r44'T., 69.25 feec;
thence S.l0'30'1618., 2O.10 feet co the tnre polnt of beglnntng.
-2-
\o t.r
x|lol, I. tlll, ![.' tolt l.clrlSl alt^H. urts l.
DltU !a |ll[t A. l{ccllt. OrrDsca.r ol lb Cogry ol l'tr',
fiitr ct Cclar&r lcE t llrrbL ocrtd.r.tto.r-brlby tr'D3,-lt.d ont 3a l8 nfictll tlc.' . abr.& coaporr-
irr. ccrr.-rbla rddrrrr ta ,lt0 tlrlc Elcrl l.*iet&-5rir. orrlro tol0l, Gtct.rd hr:t cl Drc.
E;--oI'oGa., iil cr th' 'olttr-'&rctlrl nl
tltctt L.as- fr 3b rrat ct lllr, lt.:. ct 6lorrdo'
3. rllt
ExHi tsiT 'Oo
II1|EI
FEr.le gtllllllgl-egg L.,.,fr--
I rrrt of lrtr .r l. !a e , llcb t'Cr lrllI1llo. ?t!rt tlrrdr Gc*Y d tr3b, lccr
oC CrLirtr ur frtfcgbslT |rlcrlbd o
trllrr
rttrh .3 t fcbrc scFra cc 14 r'
lio t.E. lrtl lUb., llrrr tillll 3b.
rottl ta'ilr00r ll: l Srts of u9.at !..3ilucr tstlb t!'ltr$i lrr3 r dlr:rr ol
Uf .O tlt tr r FIDB cC rrcrrt sbrf flcf
a crrsi-aa:f d'itc lrrLaj-r !{F oC f '00i;;'a crcrrl rirrr cr ll'oo'o0ir d I
irc irrsrrr ot loi.tl trog co . Ftc o(-;;;r;; ciia. rlo[ retd tujri nrtl t9'
ltr6o'r irrt r alrcc. ol lAt.at trc 30 .
DctlG ct ortrar t 3trea a:tl a GuFf, cc 3bllar uvtar r-crdlrrr ot ltt.lt t-c. I cr*rrlrirr cc tt!rt'". rod ra rro blt$ ct tl'00
fric to . ,olorlt irrr folb l0"O'llx loc
r dlr3er-ot !6t.lf l..t to ch. tqrtb llt ol
iU toc rl cbrr lanth lftft'00tr tb.t !a.loc r.ld lqr;h ltn r dletrmr cl l!O.t!
frt-to 3b Dcl'Dc cl bqLotS;
- .J,i,laia.l!:i,:Fnll f r. - ---''.'t-- "?':: -- -=-:tr tL
ooa o. .
t*t-,tIt..lra, I/UItl3r,:c rb a.trrccOd tcl Chr rror&lf. hru
;:'l':'li: fii:::ffi i..l!,Ei::'*!*f ,*.., Gh. ilr,.
Oacrl:o
-
l;. '::lj.,Ta*rrrj,JG:::'?liEJrrct.r roi-oririil!- 'il: ,'!,I !3rcptr:rcslcG, vrrrEiiii',::.:5^ E:3.c16 D{.-crr ri,o "i i;id:;T;;1il.fl1'S..i:
ff;:33ttt-1" "vrrrsr 6 r..a t.ccl.rtoo t-,
Ircr|rrd Ghb lliL dry ot R*. . . , I l9rl.
|lrEt c ot4rDo ,3ar /rD (!G, - caal ...
*qiffi,?:rrErlt !t h.{ rei *'gicirl '1,
r"r9
'.bi
'*'l
:t't.
:
j,iE|El!trf,lFtr;l:lEl!r\ E E-I-
--l -tlb
aa - o
|llil a omo
r aut _Xtt t'| eC
Eqr.
Ullllf q fd d otltcLt x.l.
,:
tb lcarjola lrtrrrot ro rclqb{rl btor
, lttt lt f-l l.
lu&tt,.t,-.... -:I t ,a, Je.rqir.,.., !r J.!rr,r ri.r i,It h.rr t Nrr t r, ll lrrt
r,
I'
I
rt-
--q.r{.:.rrr rrh: ..r-.i _, .,
1"!l:3lEtrIt:6 tltS:t{:.r .,
\\
$
g\c
CI
\
v
tv
/
.a
,/
\l
\
\
/
t-L\5Qsr-v
1tr
ar
l|
\\
\
/\;:
/IT:
L
.,t
,t
\
Community Development Plan Routing Form
Routcd To:Greg Hall, Public Works
Teni Partch, Public Works
Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works
Mike McGee, Fire
Rcturn To:Andy Knudtscn, Community Devclopmcnt
Datc Routed:A'*at 1, / 77 ?
Rctum By:wtl?,
Projcct Name:
Projcct Address:r 0- /-
Projcct Lcgal:
Projcct Dcscription:a/r^ s/u-./'-,^-4
Lj,r--r
Approved Denied (cite detailed reasons) Approved with conditions
SIIAltl
Gonstruction
MarchT,1997
To: Lany Pardee
From: Scot Lowry
Re International Wing Steging Plan
Larry:
If you have any questions or concerns during the construction of the International Wing Project
please contact any one of the following:
Jim Aughenbaugh
Superintendent, SHAI{ C onstruction
Job Site- 479-8980 (after April l5s)
Scot LowrT
Projecl Manager, SHAW Construction
Job Site - 479-8980 (After April l5e), Mobite- 3}O-8472,GJ Ofiice- 242-9236
Attaehed are (5) sets of Plans showing the proposed fence lines during construction and applicable
dates.
North Court Access
Access to the North Court Yard of the Lodge at Vail through the Founders Square area will be
limited to 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a,m. on approved working days. All equipment and materials used in
the North Court Yard will be kept inside the fence line. The Lodge at Vail will post a bond or
present some other mutually acceptable means to insure that any damages that could potentially
occur to improvements on the access route will be corrected.
Work on Saturdays Request
We would like to request permission to work Saturdays from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for every
weekend that is not a holiday weekend. We anticipate that in order to meet our schedule we will
need to work the majority of Saturdays.
Work on Sundays
We understand that in order to work on Sundays, we must ask for permission in writing two
business days in advance.
Normal Work Hours
We understand that normal work hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
760 Horizon Drive, Grand Junction, CO 81506
(970\ 242-9236 t f 24 I -56 I 8
SIIA11'
Gonstruction
Work on Holidays
We understand that work on the following Holidays is not permitted:
Memorial Day
Fourth of July
Labor Day
Thanksgiving
Christmas
New Years Dav
Skier Bridge
We will leave the skier bridge open through April 20, 1997. The bridge will then be closed until
Thanksgiving 1997.
Noise Ordinance
We have reviewed the Town's noise ordinance and will comply with it.
Road Maintenance
We will inspect all access roads that are directly affected by our construction actMties on a regular
basis and will take measures to clean them of excessive dirt and debris as needed. We will apply a
layer ofscreened rock on the portion ofForest Road that will be used by us for access into our
construction site to help mitigate dirt that may track onto adjacent roads.
Forest Road Accessibility
We understand Forest Road is used by emergency vehicles. We will not stage any vehicles on
Forest Road that would hamper access of emergency vehicles.
Vehicle Staging
We will not allow any trucks, especially trucks delivering precast, to stage any where in the Village
while they are waiting to deliver to the job site. Trucks will use the approved route from I-70
directly to the job site to make deliveries.
Ifyou have any comments on the above please contact me. I feel that the most important part of
maintaining a staging plan that has the least amount of impact on the Town is to have an open line
of communication between us and you. I appreciate your cooperation and look forward to
working with you throughout this project. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Scot Lowry
cc: Clark Atkinsoq ARC, Tim Losq Zelven& Associates
760 Horizon Drive, Grand Junction, CO 81506
(97 o) 242-9 23 6 t f 24 | -56 r8
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f
FILE COPY
TOWN AFVAIL
75 South Frontage Road
Yail" Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 3 8/479-2 I 3 9
FAX 970-479-2452
Department of Community Development
Scptember 18,1995
Jim Broun
One Norwest Center, #3000
1700 Lincoln Ccntcr
Denver, CO 80203
Re: International Wing Lodgc at Vail
Dear Jim:
The Town of Vail has schedulcd the Intcrnational V/ing for a final Design Review Board hcaring
on October 4, 1995. Interested individuals are wclcome to attend the bearing which will be held
at thc Town of Vail, Council Chambcrs, located at 75 South Frontagc Road. The hearing will
bcgin at 3:00 p.m.
Ifyou havc any qucstions, plcase call me at (970) 479-2138.
Sinccrcly,
,ffi1*Jv4q
Andy Knudtscn
Scnior Planner
{p*,uo
Jim Brorrrn - Jay Peterson Lynn Fritzlen
One Norwest Center, #3000 108 S. Frontage Rd. #307 FriulerU Pierce, Briner
1700 Lincoln Center Vail, CO 81657 P.O. Box 57
Dflrver, CO 80203 Vail. CO 81658
Onc Vail Place Condo. Assoc. Mr. Chris Ryman U.S. Forest Servicc
C/O Steve Simonett Vail Associates Holy Cross Ranger District
P.O. Box 3459 P.O. Box 7 P.O. Box 190
Vail,CO 81658 Vail.CO 81657 Mintum.Co 81645
Riva Ridge South Condo. Assoc Riva Ridge North Condo. Assoc. Summers Lodge
c/o Marijke Brofos c/o Rick Haltermann c/o Rick Haltcrmann
P.O. Box 759 P.0. Box 3671 P.O. Box 3671
Vail,CO 81657 Vail,CO 81758 Vail,CO 81657
SiEmark Building Gore Creek Plaza Wall Street Bldg.
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Fritch c/o Vail Management Company c/o Mr. Robert Lazrer
91458 Kenyon, Suite 200 Zehren & Assoc
183 Gore Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81758
Mr. Jack Reutzel
Denver, CO 80237
Mrs. B.C. Hill
31 1 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
Jared M. Drescher
I l0l3 Tara Road
Potomac, MD 20854
201 Gorc Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81758
Greg Chrishnan
P.O. Box 1976
Avon. CO 81620
Mr. Randall H. Woods
55 Meade Lane
Englewood, CO 801l0
Mrs. Luanne Wells
712 N. Palm Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
386 Hanson Ranch Road
Vail. CO 81657
Jack Zehren
Zehren & Assoc.
Box 1976
Avon.CO 81620
fh. Harold J. Smead
6 Quail Meadows Drive
Woodside, CA 94062
Ms. Anita Saltz
6 Martin Butler Court
Rye, NY 10580
tY
<U,\!/ "i.^,
0/
I't
't*'-*' oaJ'
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
e7 0-47 9-2L38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE
ADD/ALT COMM BUILD
POSIED ON JOBSITE AT
PERMT PETMit
ALL TIMES
#: 896-0074
SHAW CONSTRUCIION CoMPANY Phonet 97Q-242-9236
?60 HORIZON DR, GRAND JUNCTTON CO 81506
SHAW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Phone z 970-242-9236
?60 HORTZON DR, GRAND JUNCTTON co 81506
LODGE PROPERTIES INC
Job Address
Location...
Parcel No..
Project No.
]-74 E GORE CREEK DR
INTERNATIONA]-, WING
2\0r-082-23-009
PRJg 6-0054
Status. . .
epplied..
Issued. ..
Expires. .
TOV/Comm. Dev.
ISSUED
04/2e /tee6oe/t8/ree6
03/t7 /Lee7
L74 E GORE CREEK DR, VAIL co 81657
Description:
ADDITION TO LODGE AT VAIL
APPIJICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
OccuPancY:
Type construction:
Type OccuPancy:
Valuation:
Fi rcptlcr Infornation: Restr i cted:
Clean-uP DePosit Refund
approved t?." =
II 1-HR TYPe II l-Hour
? , 000, 000
#of Gas ApP [i ances:
amount
date
Add Sq Ft: 30742
fof 6as Logs:#0f lood/Patl'et:
*** FEE sullltARY ffiH**r***f*Jr*ll*iffi
Bui f,ding--> ??,31&.6 Restuanant Pl,rn Revier-) .OO Tot![ Ca[cutated Fccs---> 59'106'00
Ptancheck--->14,5?1.nDRBFee.--_----.----_>5m.00AdditionatFees---_--->Investigation> .oo Recreation tcc-------> 3O,71?-W ToteL Permit Fee-----_-> 450'070'80
Ui|'tca|'|'-.-->t.66ffi*,ttl.*t'Payments-------__-_-l450,070.80
TOTAL TEES-----.
**Jrffi.ffi*firJrf**ir**ffiffi***irJrriHr*ffirrffi*****************tti*+*********t**t*trH*ffirffint*ffrffir#
Item: OslOO BUILDING DEPARTMENT ---.-Pepg!--EIIIIDING Division:
647ieZise6-oAN----- -AaEion: tlots cHUcK PLANS EXAD{rNER
08'/20',/1996 CHUCK Action: APPR -- i*r,,r,^ h:-..i[6fr;' 6sAoo-FiIiiwrNs-DeFAHrMitNt-- ---- -- -.-.-PePt: PLANNTNG Division:
64-n9/fi96-Dlw--- -- -AcE.iona NQT-E ANqY BLA\NEr0971371996 ANDY Action: APPR Ancly Knudtsen
iirein'r, os-ooo'Tins DEpARiEEiiT ---
-_ _'_ ____ Dept: FIRE Divrsron:
047i9/1996 olnt Action: NQIE l'lrKE FrRE06,/ii,/iggb MrKE M Acrlon: liFFn [ppionea per conditiql_s__ _,i€r"fi;, os56o"iijErTc wtji.frg---' oepi: eUa woRK Divieion:
64119/19-e6-DAN-- Action: NorE rERRT-P!I---
0471671996 l,ennv-p Action: APPR sEE coNDrTIoNs
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may aPply to this perrnit.
DECLARATIONS
I hcreby acknovLedge th.t I have read this appl,ication, fitted.out in futl' the information. required, comPteted an accurate Ptot
pl,an, a-nd state thit al,t thc infornation provided as r$uired is correct. I agree to compty vith the inforrnation and ptot plan,
io conpfy yith att Tolrn ordinances snd statc [aus, and io buil,d thig structure according to th! Tovn's zoning lnd subdivision
codcsr'disign r:viev approvcd, Uniforr Bui Lding C6de and other ordinancca of the Tol,n appticabte thcrcto.
REAUESTS FOR I]{SPECTIONS SHALL BE ITADE TIENTY-FOI'R HOURS tN ADVANCE BY TELEP}PI{E AI 179-213E OR AT OUR OFFTCE FROIT E:OO AB 5:OO P
o
Send C[ean-UP DePosit To: SHAiI
********************************************************************************
CONDITIONS
Permit #: 896-00?4 as of 09/18/96 Status: ISSUED
********************************************************************************
Permit Type: ADD/ALT CoMM BUILD PERMT
Applicant: SHAW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
97 0-242-9236
Job Address:Location! fNTERNATIONAL WING
Parcel No: 2101-082-23-009
Description:
ADDITION TO LODGE AT VAIL
Conditions:1. FTRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REOUIRED BEFORE
Applied: o4/29/tee6
Issued: 09/I8/7996
To Expire. 03/I'7/t997
ANY WORK CAN BE
STARTED.2. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REOUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
3. Applicant shal1 submit a redesign of the walkway between
the One Vail Place building and the International Wing. The
current design of pots on shelves shall be replaced with
the traditional planter design. Redesign shall be subrnitted
by 10-1-96.4. Applicant shaLl submit a revised drainage design to the ToV
on or before 10-1-95.
5. Applicant shal1 subrnit a recorded access easenent (including
the legal description) for the access easement between One
vail Place and the International wing prior to scheduling a
framing inspection.6. No signage has been approved. Iemporary construction signs
as well as pernanent signs for the uses within the Lodge
must be submitted for DRB review and approval.
7. A parking fee of $360,964.80 shall be paid by the applicantprior to picking up the building permit.
8. The lighting fixture approved for use as landscape lighting. is MR-16, 2-Pin, Gx5.3 | 14789, Q20llrl-6/nsp(esx). Initial
Lumens shall not exceed 260.9. AII landscape and regrading shall comply with sheet L7,
dated 9-6-96. No improvements Ehall be alLowed on the USFS
properEy.
10. dRAINAGE AND SITE GRADING HAVE YET TO BE APPROVED.1],. CONTRACTOR HAS UNTIL OCTOBER 1,1996 TO HAVE SUBMITTED AND12. APPROVED DRAINAGE PLANS, OTHERWISE THE PROJECT WILL BE RED13. TAGGED. THIS CONDITION WAS DISCUSSED AND UNDERSTOOD BY TIM14. LOSA, PROJECT ARCHITECT AND JIM ELLERBROOK, PROJECT ENGINEER15. ON FRTDAY SEPTEMBER 6,1996.16. Permit is approved on condition adequate water pressure and
supply are |iovided per letter fron-Tim Losa, zihren & Assoc
DATE:
PER}IIT #
PERI.IIT APPLICATtrON
Legal Description: f.ot SC Block
Owners Nane:
Architect:
General Description:
Csnrna.ga-c,t.q.- Cel2=
ph.Lfd 5)l\
*** **:r * * * * * **** * * * ** * *** ***
Town of vail Req. No.,/d?-tr)Phone Nunbear- qio LaL.ffi4V/- rg zz_Town of Vail Reg. NO.Phone Number:
Plunbing Contractor:
Address:Town of VaiI Reg. NO.Phone Number:
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:Town of Vail Reg. NO.Phone Number:
****************!r*************** FOR oFFrcE usE ** ************ * ****************BUTLDTNG PERMIT FEE:
PLWBING PERI.TIT FEE:
I'IECHANICAL pERl.tIT FEE:
ELECTRICAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
BUTI,DTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE:
PLUI.IBING PI-,AN CHECK FEE:I,IECI{ANICAL PIAN CHECK FE8:
RECREATTON FEE:
Ph.
g[*"" and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Apptiances
,(* * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * vALuATroNs
Gas Logs_ Woodr/pellet
lvork class: [ ]-New [ ]-Alteration \-odutaionat 1 llnepair J l-other
Number of Dwelllng Units:Nunber of Accomnodation Units:
********** ** *** ***** **** ** *******
TOTAL:
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
CI-,TAN-UP DEPOS
TOTAL PERUTT
BUTLDTNG:
SIGNATUREs
ZONING:
STGNATIT'RE:
CLEAN I'P DEPOSIT BEFTIXD TO:
?5 3oulh trontago ro.d
,.i1. colorado 81657
(3031 479-2L38 ot 479-2L39
TO:
SROM:
DATE:
su&TECA:
offlce of communlty devclopmcnt
ALL CONTRASTORS CI'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITIT TIIETOWN OF VAIL
TOI{N OF VAIL PUBLIC WORI(S/COMMI NITY DEVELOPMENT
IitaRcH 15, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING T MATERIAIJ SIORAGE
rn suurnary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unr.awful for anyperson to litter, track or deposit.any .Jif,-r""i, sand,, debrisor material , incr'uding_trash Eunpsters, portabre toilets andworknen vehicles. upon any streetl siaewaii, -;ii;y or publicBl?:"_::-any porriin trreieo;. --,iir" ;i;;r:;i_;;":;" arr rown ofvarr streets and_.f?"-d= is approxinaieiy-s-it.-lti pavement.This ordinance witt be stribily--lnforced by the Town of vairPublic works DeDartment. --i.""in] found .,riir.Ii'g this ordinancewilr be siven a-24 hour rriri;;";"ii""-t"-;;;;;;'=.id nareriar..In the event the person so notified.aoes-noi-";;;piy with thenotice within ttti^31 tr-"t-ti-".-iiecitied, trre puf,ric worksDeparrment erirr remove said mate;i;i-;r-irrJ'E.pli;e of personnotified- The provi=ions-or-till oror.nance shall not beapplicabte to c6nstruction, ,.i't.r,.rge 9-r repair projects ofany street or alley or any utiiiiies in the ,ijfr[_"_".y.
To review ordinance No- 5 in full, prease stop by the Town of::li.::ii:i"3,":f,i*mll"::"";;;i" a copv. rirani< vou for your
?osition
)r
1/zq/qu
(i.e. contractor, orirner)
75 toulh trontsge .oad
Y!ll, color.do 81657
(3o3'l 479-2L38 ot 479-2L39 ottlcc of Gonmunlty dcyclopmartl
BUILDING PERI.iIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this pen]tJ.t requires a Town of Vail Fire Departnent Approval,Ensineer"s (pubric works) review .;d ;d;;;i,t'iillliil!"i.p."t .ntreview or Hearth Departmint.review,-un[
"-review uy ilre"duiraing
SSrt[HE',1;.[3: "r.ir.ted time ro"'u-tut"r ""ui"n-il.v"Lil,u, rons
All conmerc-ial ('rarge or smal't) and a'[ multi-famiry permits wi'have to folrow the ibove menti6ned mi*irur requirements. Residentialand small projects shourd tare J-ielie""umound of time. However, ifresidentiar or smar ter.projtiis-ii,iiii' the various above mentioneddepartments with reqard to-necissiiy-""ui"*, these projects mayalso take the three-week perioJ.
Every.attempt wflr be made by this departrnent to expedite thispenni't as soon as possible. - ev E'\'"s\r ' es r'rl
l:-Il" undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and timetrame -
;1|=1.-q=eKtL Auo*drJz -P"6611;;"---'
Communi ty 0eve'l oomont Departmenr.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAY g, 1994
WHEN A "PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'IS REQUIRED
Job Name:
Date:
Please ihe following questionnaire regarding the need for a'public way permit.:
YES
ls lhis a new residence?
ts demolition work being performed
that requires lhe use of the right
of way, easements or public propeSy?
ls any utility wor4< needed?
ls the driveway being repaved?
ls different access needed to site
other than existing driveway?
ls any drainage work being done
affeaing lhs right ol way, easements,
or public property?
ls a'Revocable Right Of Way permit.
required?
I have read and answered all
8) A. ls the right of way, easements or
public property to be used for staging,
parking or fencing?
B. lf no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or fencing plan required by Community
Development?
!f19u_ algwered yes to any of lhese questions, a 'Public Way permit' must be obtained.?ublic Way Permit" applicafions may be obtained at the pubtic Work's office or atCommunity Development. .lf you hlve _any questions please calf Cnarrie Davis, the Townol Vail Construction Inspector, at 479-215g.
NOv1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7',)x
Job Name
questions.
\/rs /qu
Ol/11/98 18:28
Janury 14, 1998
To:
Fron:
Rc:
FAtr 9?0t79E981 INTENATIONAL frNG
silfiw
Gonstruction FrvL
LoD(rf
E16-
JdAtcucio
Dick Ilunn
Ctrrlic Drvb
Scot Irwry
I1CO Lcrrd 125 Lodgc et Vril
Atbcbed is tlre le6er from Yoder regarding the smoke alrrms. \Ve
prwcm thc probleor umil the Spring slxn doum ifthe detectors
have corrccted the other items on the list from tbe Fire Department
Sprinkler tead corrers replrced n (4) locerions
Phonc systGm is confirmed to be worting in all rooms
Closer on Serr"ice Stair is fixed
Drywall is hung at Sqvice elwatorlobby
Pleaso call with questions. Thank pu.
760 llorizo Driw
Gmdlucrhu, CDtl56
(vlol242-yr%t f (9m) 241-5618
Sincaely,
C,
va02
also udered dcflcctors to bclp
to be sct offby thc fan coils. trre
ot/t1/s8
Jan,- I'rl-99
16:28 FAI
C'2=22P
370{708981 ITNG
I".U Err€ttn€aring J-s+e- ress
INIENATIONAL Eor
P. Ot
Y0nEnIt
ilr.i;i l;;;ii':l;l f r;,
i:, i. ,:l /{ ..{"
I}fEM
r'
i"li(li/l4ei iil;l
.J .',
\./ .4 J L ,-;
ii; r; , ,'
L' ,'.'
OR.A ND U M
TO:
FROM;
DATE:
RE:
CC:
Mr. Timl-os., Z&a & Associrtoe
Strnton O. Humpb'deq P.E.
Jaruary 14, l99t
fatcnedondWlng; Thc hdtc $ Vdl
YT,C#964/j7
Mr'. Scot Lowry, Shtw Conctruorion
VIAFASCIMII,D
(l)Pegc
Wc hew rcvic*ed with Scot, Shew Corrcatctioo thc resryding the sapkc
dc{c*om bdng ret ofrty ths hot air from thc fiur coils. Wo
awry onc.r thc boitcrr are ured at firll capacity.
thir problcnr to go
At thir tirr ths boiks fceding ths srrter that r€ oP€at, .rc rt nidmd c.pacity, Tbe
conrcquorcc it thrt holt€r thur plroood naic is being pumpod the ftn coils and
th$ bciog blown out of ths fin coils- Thir houcr thrn nornul is reting the mrolc
to thc boilcrr tho airdctacrors off. We e*pcst thet whcn more hctdng s1roteme arE
tmpcrrttre ftom tha lbn coilc will bc rcduccd. The lowcr air liom the fra
coilr $urld mt uip tho tilnokc ddscilon.
Plcasc call us for rny dir$rsiou.
JN{ I 41e91
SOtUmo
alE EFAvr4, cnErr 6l.vD. gttttE to7o IOiT O['FlCli 8OX t7{o. Ar'olt CYllI'L/rDo
aTSIIJATI1D ?trE fln II|I On('utr rtrc'. Dt''|vr&
rlELEPFol!, !tit.9a9am. tAt( 9tll'tre-l9tf
ot/14/9E
rt
16:28 F I 970 INTENATIONAL ING
lYednesdey, Jenua r! 14,
Town of Vail
Charlie Davis
Phone: 970479-2453
Fax: 9704794452
SIIAW Construction
Scot Lowry
Phone: 970479{980Fsx: 970-479{981
3
{79E08o Eor
I)ate:
To:
From:
Pages:
Subiect:
Infotmedon fron TICO Inrpcttor.
TOWNOFVAIL
75 S.FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
97U479-2138
DEPARTMENT OF CONII\4UITIT DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON IOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
DEMO. OF PART/ALL BLIDG. Permit #: D960012
fob Address: 174 E GORE CREEK DR VAIL Status . . . : FINAL
Location.......; LODGE AT VAIL INTERNATIONAL WING Applied . . : 08/27/7996
ParcelNo....: 2101.08223N9 Issued...: 09/0g/7996
Project No . : ?? Expires . . .: 03/02/7997
APPIJICAIIT SIIAW CONSTRUCTION COtr{pANy OS/27/t996 phone: 970-242-9236
750 HORIZON DR
GRJAI,ID iIIJNCTION CO
81505
I-,icense: 108-A Also is CONTRACTOR
or'tNER I_,ODGE PROPERTIES INC 08/27/L996 phone:
L74 B GORE CREEK DR
VAIIJ CO
8L657
License:
CoNIRACTOR SHAW CONSTRUCTTON COMpAlry 0e/27/!995 phone: 970-242-9236
750 HORIZON DR
GRAIID iII]NCTIOT CO
81s06
I-,icense: 108-A Also is Applicant
-r I {ft^k-, W4j-w<Y <-
uftlnn
Occupancy:
Type Construction:
Type Occupanry: ??
Valuation: $65,000.00
Fireplace Information: Reseicted:
Desciption:
DEMO OF CONFERENCE ROOM AND EARTHWORK ONLY
wood Peller offiffi******* ** FEE SUMMARY
Building-> S565 . 00 Restuarant Plan Review->
AddSqFe 0
#ofGasAppliances:0#ofGaslogs:0#of
$0.00 Total Calculated Fees-> 91,285.25
$0.00
$0.00 Total perqrit Fee_> 91,285.25
Plan Check-> S3E? .2s DRB Fee--> 5100.00 Additional Fees->
lnvestigation->
will call->
SO. 00 Recreation Fee->
ta . OO Payments-> iL,285 .2s
TOTAL FEE$-> 51,285.2s BALANCE DUE-->s0,00
Approvals:
I€e.m: O5100 BUIITDING DEPARI'I{ENI
08/27/!996 DIJ|I Action: APPR
o8/29/L995 DAN Action: CANC TOM MOREHEAD NEED
TO OK
08/30/L995 DAN Action3 APPR
Iten: 05400 PI-,AI{NING DEPARTMENT
08/2911996 ANDY
It,em: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMEIE
09/03/1996 CHARIJIE Action: AppR pER MIKE MCGEE
Item: 05500 PUBL,IC WORKS
08/3O/t996 IJARRY_P Action: AppR LARRy PARDEE
Item: 05700 ENVIRONMENTAI-, HEAIJTH
O8/27/L996 CHARIJTE ACtiON: APPR
Item: 05900 IJIQUOR
08/27/!996 CHARI_,IE Action: APPR
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this applicatiog filled out in full the information required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is coffect. I agree to comply with the information and
plot pla4 to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoninp
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUE$IS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TEI.EPHONE AT 479-2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:OO AM . 4
PM,
SIGNATI]RE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
Act.ion: APPR Andy *udr".P
PAGE2
*****l.t****rit ***********:ts:t!*****LHdil**il**#*************:***********************************fit********
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Perrrit#: D9G0072 asofOT-7L2003 Status: FINAL
*drlit*{i****ffi*lnF*rl*l*:t***,.**lr.t*******l*!t!ffiffi*****'t*r*********!ki****i********************
PermitType: DEMO. OF PART/ALL BUDG. Applied: 08/27/1996
Applicant SHAWCONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY Issued: w/03/7996970-242-9?3,6 To Expire: 0g/OZ/1997
]ob Address: 174 E GORE CREEK DR VAIL
Location: LODGE AT VAIL INTERNATIONAL WING
ParcelNo: 210708223009
Description:
DEMO OF CONFERENCE ROOM AND EARTHWORK ONLY
Conditions:
Cond: CON0002844
THIS PERMIT IS GOOD FOR DEMO AND GRADING ONLY. NO FOOTING
ORFOUNDATION WORK ALLOWED UNTILFLILL BL}ILDING PERMITIS
ISST]ED
Cond: CON0002845
Applicant shall provide a letter of credit, good through
November 7,1996, for the regrading and landscaping of the
site, in the event that the applicant does not pick up the
building pennit. Letter of credit shall be for $31,250 and
shall be provided at time demo permit is picked up.
Cond:1
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY
WORK CAN BE STARTED.
Cond:12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPLIANCE.
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, co 81557
97 0-4'19-2L38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NoTE:THISPERMITMUSTBEPoSTEDoNJoBSITEATALLTIMES
ELECTRICAL PERM]T PCTNit #: E96-0211
Job AddreBS
Location...
Parcel No..
Project No.
APPLICANT B&B ELECTRIC
2818 l/2 NORTH AVENUE, GRAND JUNCTTON co
CONTRACTOR B&B ELECIRIC
2818 r/2 NORTH AVENUE, GRAND JUNCTToN co
OWNER I-,ODGE PROPERTIES INC
t'14 E GORE CREEK DR' vArL co 81657
:-74 E GORE CREEK DR SIAIUS...: ISSUED
LODGE AT VAIL INTERNAITIOAppIied. .: 09/04/.L996
2!0I-082-23-009 Issued. . .: 09/04/1996
PRJ96-0054 ExPires..: 03/03/1997
Phone: 303242245O
81s 01Phone: 303242245O
81501
Description: TEMP POWER FOR CONSTRUCTION TRAILER Valuation:s00 . 00
******ir*r*****Jr**rffi*ffiit*J(*t#***Jcffiffirffi FEE sul 'lARy r#t'l*ffirff*li,H<ffiffi*ff**fr-kfJnt'tlt**tiffir*tffiirtr
EtectlicE(---> 5o.oo
DRB Fee
Total, Catcul,ated Fees---> 103.00
Investigation>
Ui l, L Ca t l,---->
IOTAL FEES-.->
**HrJi#rirffi#*r.rri*.rrkriffirri*irt**iitsff,rrri*r (***lrffi**ffir**|tJ(ffriiffi:tt|*iflffi*i**ffi*i
Item: .06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT ----- Dept: BUILDING Division:
o5/d4/1996 ctiAnl,ie Action: APPR FoR ERNsr
*******ffi*****'oHJ*ltffr*ffirffit*ti**t***t******r*titffi(ffif,*****rr*rilcHr**t**tri.rffi******Hdrid"l'itrr.kf$ffd(ffit**
CONDTTION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
*********f* *#t**
DECLARATIONS
t heneby acknoyl,rdge that I have rcld this appl,ication, fitted.out in futt thc information required, comP[eted.an accurate Ptot
ptan, and state thit al,t the infornation provideA as riquired.is €orrect. t agree to comply with the information and Ptot Ptan,
to clmpty vith aLl, Toun ordinanccs and stite [aHs, and to buitd thig stfucturc according to the Tounrs zoning and subdivision
codcs,'design revieu approved, unifonn Bui(ding code and other ordinances of the Town appticabte thereto'
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I'IADE TIIEI{W-FOUR HOURS IT{ AOVANCE BY TELEPHONE
.00
3.00
105.00
.00
103.00
103.00
.00
Additional, Fees--------->
TotaI Pcrnit Fee-------->
Payments--------
BALANCE DUE-----
N 479-2':8 oR AT oUR orFrcE FRol.l 6:00 An 5:00
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-2138
APPTICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
Description:
Job Address
Location...
Parcel No..
Project No.
ISSUED
1o/ot/Lee6
!0 /0L/Lee6
03 /30 /L9e7
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: P96-0161PLTIMBING PERMIT
L74 E GORE CREEK
L74 E GORE CREEK
2t0t-082-23-009
PRJ9 6-0054
DR
DR
Status. . .
App1ied..
Issued. . .
Expires. .
KIMMEL MECHANICAL, INC.
3700 E.41ST. AVE., DENVER,
KIMMEL MECHANICAL, INC.
3700 E.41ST. AVE. I DENVER,
LODGE PROPERTIES INC
I74 E GORE CREEK DR, VAIL
ROOF DRAINS
co 80216
co 80216
co 81657
Valuation:
Phone z 303-322-8144
Phone: 303-322-8144
1, 400 . 00
*1ffi#ffi(*******ffi*ffi**ffiffir#i***** tEE SUllllARY
Ptunbing-----> 30.00 Restuarant Plan Rcviev--> .00 Totat catcutatld Fees---) 40.50
Ptan Ch.ck---> 7.50 ToTAL FEES------
Investigation> ,00 Total Permit Fee--------> 40.50
t,i tt Cal,l,____> j.00 payments_______
BALANCE DUE__________> .ootr*Jr**hf**rrt#****************li * *rdrH*Jrffirff**t l******ffir*
Iten: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division:L0/01/!996 CHARLIE Action: APPR CHARLIE DAVIS
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQ'D TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
ffi rffirnHnhiir**t**fH*ffiffiffiffi**ffi
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this apptication, fitl,ed out in ful,t the infornation required, conptcted an accurate plot
ptan, and statc that a[[ the information providcd as requircd is correct. I agfee to compty uith the infornation and ptot p[an,
to conp(y Hith atl Toyn ordinances and state [rvs, and to buitd this structure according to the Toyn's zoning and subdivision
codes, d€sign rev'iev approvld, uniforn 8uil,d'ing Code lnd other ordinances of thr Town appl,icabte thereto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I.IADE TIIEI{TY-TOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY
os/24/96 00306 FAI @oos
tr[ff#[::i;shsr:',r::i*=!*l***ffis#P'o''lr*r,___DAIE:___ Pw{, _u5f
at ePPLIcATroll xl'sr BE Frr-Y'rlD onT couPr;EllErrY oR fl IAY Not BE AccEiEgDD--
f,rr*****{**r***rrr*rrr**+*l*r. pEnurT rrrFoRuAf,ror rt**.r*...****rr**ri* {!.***;..I l-Butlding t[l-Plttubiag l-Elactrical [ 1-[echiai-cal t ]_otherafob N||!e:
L€gal Description: trpt Block_ Fillng
Ottn3ra Na&e:
Architcct:
coneral. DescriptLon:
Ph.,F
Ph.
work clasas [ ]_Ne{ [ ]_Alteration
lflrlbct of DweUing Unitsr _
^}rffi"r
and tlpe of Fl.rcplacess casv
fi!r**!a t***r rr!r*t at**lr't**a***rt*+rl t +
e
I l-Repait I J-other
of Accor"'trodlatLotr Unit€, --Gas Iogs Wood,/pellet
VAIIIA8fONS **ttl**** ti:rt* *r!r*rt***r***r*****j
Otmn: I
!o|lAl,3
. PIuEblnE
Mdrese:
lfechanical Contractor:Lddres8:
*tt * *** I t* a r r ra* *t * *a**r*,r!r*trr IBUU"I}INC PERI1III rEE:
_P_rrniBrNc penrrrr i!n,}TECEINIC.AL PER}TIE EEE;EI.ECTRTCAI, FEET
OTHER ?YPE OF TEE:DRB FEE:
Town of Val.I. neq. NO.Pbone Nl$ber:
Tovn of Vail Req.Pbonc Nutbcr:,3,i,a
BUrI{)ING: J, T
lirrnrBnlc, i'FbET
,t;;:;:i.:::r:::::--:
Address:
Electrical
Address:Contractori
.lddr.ss:
Address:
IXJ-ACd.itlonal
Nrubqr
Appliancas
EI.ECTRTCAI.I $
uEcEAnre,AIJi f-
IJob Addies", l?.*. e. hXe G Af
t
Tpyn of vail Reg. ffo.}c4 F\Phgnc NuDbGr:
FOR Off*p^lSj ** *_* *'r * * r r* r rr r **.* :r* !r *, r,r r i***lggD._ryc Pr.rtN cmcK FEE:
_P,Lrrualilc ptanr cnecx },ee:ECEA}|ICII prar cgucx rnr:RECRENXTOI| .EEE!CIEN{-I'E DEFOSTT:
TO,IDAL PERET! FEES!
EIIDTNG;
STGNAfi'IIEs
zoNrx6t
STGIATTIRT:
--t
--
-l-
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
970-479-2138
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED oN JOBSITE AT ALL TTMES
Permit *: E96-0292ELECTRICAL PERMIT
Job Address: I74 E GORE CREEK DR Status...: ISSUEDLocation...: 174 E GORE CREEK DR Applied. . : Lr/1,3/Is96Parcel No.. : 2IO1-O82-23-009 Issued...: II/27/1996Project No. : PRJ96-0054 Expires. . : 05/20/1997
APPLfCANT B&B ELECTRIC, INC. phone: 970-242-245028L8 L/2 NORTH AVE., GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501
CONTRACTOR B&B ELECTRIC, INC. phone: 970-242-24502818 t/2 NORTH AVE., GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501OWNER LODGE PROPERTIES INCI74 E GORE CREEK DR, VArL CO 81657
Description: FIRE AI-,,ARM SYSTEM Valuation:4, 200 . 00
**************t********rr**ffi**********ffi**#******* FEE SUl.lt4ARy i*********************ft****************t**ffi******
95.00
.00
93.00
93.00
.00
*****************ffi********ir****************t****:ht#*rhlt*******ffffrff****rHrtH(ffi********ir*ffi**ffiff****ff********ffirffiffi*
I!e+i .gqQq0_EI,EqTBICAL DEPARTMENT Depr: BUTLDTNG Division:ll/13/1996 CHARLIE Actionr APFR N/Arrb.m:' .05600 _EIBE pEP4,RTMENT - , Dept: FrRE Division:!!/,!3/.!996. qEABLIE Acaio;; NorE pLANs ro FrRE-DEi,i.'-I1'/2I'/L996,JEFF_A Act.iona AFFR FIIG-oept.-Aflpioires
***ff******ffi***********ffiffi**fiffid****ft**ffi***********r.ir***#***ffi**ffi**tr****ffir****t*ffi*******
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. A FI}{AL INSPE_CTION APPROVAL IS REQ'D ON THIS PERMIT PRIOR TOA T.C.O. BEING ISSUED2. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
***************ffi********ffi*******Jrl***irlt***'r't*****ffi**ffiH*M******ffiffi**********ffi*****rtrbtrtffiffi*
DECLARATIONS
r hereby acknorrtedge that r have read-this aPpl.ication, fiLl,ed out in ful.t the information required, cornpteted an accurate p1otpl'an, and state that aLl the infornation provided as required.is correct. I agree to compLy rrith tire infonmation and ptot irl,an,to comply with al'l' Town ordinances -and state [aws, and io buiLd this st ructu re-accord i ng to'the iown;s zoninl ano subdivisioncodes/ design review approved, uniforn Buil,ding Code and other ofdinances of the Town afpticabte thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE IIADE TI.IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT 479-2'138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROI4 E:(x) Ail 5:OO PI.I
STcNATURE oF oUNER oR coNrRAcroR Fon xnrsElF-lno-
E Lect ri ca [--->
DRB Fee
Investi gat i on>
Ui tl. cat l.---->
90.00
.00
.m
3.00
TotaI Catcutated Fees--->
AdditionaI Fees--------->
TotaI Permit fee-------->
Payments--------
BALANCE OUE-----TOTAL FEES---> 93.M
-i.*Contact
aE 970-3
Pr""
TOWN OF PERIIIT #
Ea
li,
le Co
7!fo'
rsesso
eL ll
t
p
2':
nc
or rc
PARCEL /I:PERMIT
VATL CONSTRUCTTON
APPLICATTON FORM
DATE: 11/11/96
Nrrmber and Tvne of Fireplaces: Gas Appria.Fcels__ cas Logs_ wood/pelret, - rii 1a 4 -- -:- !v:'r- '!rr''e**************************** *****F{#iuol&J1fi*********************************
I Pire Alarrn
?y_r_l?Ilgt J-- Er,EcrRrcAlr 6 4'200'00 orHER: $?LUMBING: l'lEcHANrcAl: $-_.---- Toiaii +_-
lit * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CoNTRACTOR INFORMATION ***************************ieneral Contractor: Shaw Construction .n,.rr.,h ^€ rr- { 1 rr^-rcrlel-clJ- \-LTIILId(jL(JI': Dtlcrw vL,rrDLr uLLaull TOWn Of Vail Req. NO.rddress: 760 Horizon pn"""-N,r^UJi: -'I7S'-f
llectrical Contractor: D & B Electric, Inc.
'ddress: 2BLB I/2 North Ave.l-TFai-dJEEi 0r-
'lumbing Contractor:
.ddress:
iechanical
.ddress:
Contractor:Reg. No.
*******************************FOR OFFTCE USE *******************************
Town of vail Req. No.
Phone Number: Ofq 242::ir:;o-
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
Town of Vail
Phone Nurnber;
Reg. No.
Peoqa- 6 6 5\
, APPLTCATTON MUST BE FTLLED OUT COMPLETELY OR rT MAy NOT BE ACCEPTEDVIt****************************:t PERMIT INFORMATION *****************************
t [ ]-Building [ ]-Plunbing [Xn-Efectrical [ ]-Mechanibal [ ]-other
Job Narne: Lodge AL Vail Job Address: 174 E, Gore Creek Dr. Vail, CO 81657
Legal Description: Lot Block_ Filinq snRn rvr q r
^r\r
.
Owners Nane: Lodge Properties, fnc. Addressz I74 E. GgS lfgek Dr,,Vail, Cp5.
Architect i Address:Ph.
General Description: FIRB ALARM SYSTEM
.Jwork cLass: [x]-New [ ]-Al-teration [ ]-Additionat 1 l-Repair [ ]-other
Number of Dwelling Units:Nunber of Accommodation Units:
UILDING PERMIT FEE;
LUMBING PERMIT FEE:
ECHANTCAL PERMTT FEE:
LECTRTCAI, FEE:
THER TYPE OF FEE:
RB FEE:
BUII,DING PI,AN
PLUI'IBING PI,AN
MECHANICAL P
RECREATTON
CLEAN-UP DE
TOTAL PERMIT
BUILDTNG:
SIGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE!
VALUATION
DEPOSIT REFI'ilD
Itc, Ir;3
l\JontrtE-D
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
o
L/-t,/- 17
DEVELOPMENTTOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
vArL, co 8l-657
9't 0-47 9-2L38
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
JOBSITE AT AI.,L TIMES
Permit #: E97-0052
Job Address
Location. . .
Parcel- No. .Project No.
B&B ELECTRIC, INC.
28tB I/2 NORTH AVE
B&B ELECTRIC, INC.
2BL8 t/2 NORTH AVE
LODGE PROPERTIES IN
L74 E GORE CREEK DR
Description: TEMP POWER
*********************t**********************************r**
I74 E GORE CREEK DR STaTus...
LODGE AT VAIL ADDITION App1ied..2LOI-OB2-23-009 Is8ued...PRJ96-0054 Expires. .
Phone t 97Q-2
815 01
I S SUED
o4/14/Lee7
o4/r4/ree7
ro /17 / LesT
42-2450
GRAND JUNCTTON/ CO
GRAND JUNCTION, CO
Phone: 970-242-2450
815 01,
c
VAIL CO 81657
Valuation! .00
FEE SUlil14ARy **********************************************************
E Iect ri ca [--->
DRB Fee
Investigation>
i t t caLl.---->
TOTAL FEES--->
TotaI catcutated Fees--->
Additionat Fees--------->
TotaI Pernit Fee-------->
.00
.oo
.00
5.00
53.00
Payments-------
53.00
.00
53.00
.00BALANCE DUE----
***********************************t***************t*******************************************t******i*t*************************
Dept: BUILDING Division:
FOR ERNST DepI: FIRE Divieion:
***t**********it*******************t****t**lr***it******************************t**********************t*t*************************
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPTIANCE.
*******t****i*****************i*t*******************************************ff*t****t**********ff*******************it************
DECI.,ARATIONS
I hereby acknortedge that I have read this apptication, fiLted out in fuLl the information requ'i red, conpteted an accurate ptotptan, and state that at[ the information provided as required is correct. I agree to compty with the information and ptot ptan,to conpty Hith ttt Tovn ofdinances and state [aws, and to buil.d this structurc according to the Town's zoning and subdivision
codes, design review approved, tlniform Buil.ding Code and other ordinances of the Tovn appl,icabl,e thereto.
REouEsTs FoR INSPECTIoNS SHALL 8E IiADE TI|ENTY-FoUR HoURS IN ADVANCE 8Y TELEPHONE Al 179-213A OR AT OUR OFFtcE FRolt 8:OO At't 5:OO P
ITem: O6OOO ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENTO4/14/1997 CHARLIE Action: APPRIt'em:. 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
Jiot - o8l-J3-6q
Plunbing Contractor:
Address:
Mechanical Contractor:
Address:
******* ** *********** * ********** *
BUILDING PERIi'IT FEE:
PLWBING PERMTT FEE:
MECHANTCAIJ PER}IIT FEE:
ELECTRICAL FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
-TOWN OF VATL CONSTRUCTION
PER}'TT APPLICATION FORMDATE:4/LI/97
PERMIT /I
, APPLTCATTON MUST BE FTLLED OUT COltpLETErJy oR IT r'IAy NOT BE ACCEPTED
I** ****** ****!r************** *** PERMIT fNFORI,IATJON **************** ********* ** **rl [ ]-Buirding [ ]-Plunbing [X]-Electrical 1 1-uechanical t l-other
Job Narne: Lodge at Vail Job Address: 174 E. Gore CreekDr.. Vait
Legal Description: Lot Block_ Filing susprvrsroN,
Owners Name: Lodee Prooerties. fncAddress:Ph.
Architect z .4!jEN,e 4E!r', r, u Address:P}r.?11-b zs7
General Descripti6n; Electrical-Rernodel
I{ork cLass: [x]-New [ ]-Alteration t l-Addttional [ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Number of Dwelling Units: 1 Number of Accomnodation Units:
^)F&""
and Tlpe of Firepraces: Gas Appliances_ Gas Logs_ wood/pellet_vIt********************************* VALUATTONS * **** ******** *********** ****** ***7l E?7- aosi'-BUILDTNG: ELECTRICAL: S:O!1.-OO OrrrNN: Ip^LUl.{BrNc: f _ MECHANTcAT: $- TorAL: $-
rI* ***** ** * *********** * * ** *** coNlR AcToR rNFORl,tATroN *** ** * **** ******** *********f Eeneral contractor: shaw construction Town of Vail Reg. No._Address: 760 Hotirorr phone Number: 242_9236
-.--Electrical Contractor:B & B Electric, Inc.Address:28ta 1/2 North ffi Town of Vai.l Reg. xo. )&-t
Phone Number: gl O -Zt*Z-ffi
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Nunber:
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Nurnber:
FOR OFFICE USE *******************************
BUILDING PI,AN CHECK FEE:
PLWBTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE:
MECHANICAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
BUTLDING:
SIGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
CI.EAlr IIP DEPOSIT IEFIII{D TO!
{s:. oo
75 3outh fronlage roed
Yrll, color'do 81657
(303) 479-2138 or 479-2L39 ofllco of sommunlty deyclopmonl
BUILDING PERI.IIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAIIE
If this perTit requires a Town of Vail fiire Department Approval,Engineer''s (public works) reyiew and approvar, i Fiinnini-b.pu"t
"ntreview or Health Department review, ani'a_review uv ihe duiioingDepartment, the estinated time for a total review-ilay'i.["'ii r6ngas three weeks.
l]] .:fr:ry'ial (1arge or smalt) and alt mutti_family permits willnave t0 roilow the above mentioned maximum requiremLnts. Residentialill.:Tlll proiects.should take a lesser amount of time. However, ifresroentlat or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
lglirlTilq.with resard. to necessary review, tt.i" pioj".li"ruyarso tat(e tne il1ree week period.
Every.attempt will be made by this department to expedite thispermi't as seon as possible
I' the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and timeframe.
Lodge at Vail
Project Name
4/rL/97
0tT[ 0
Communi ty Development Department.
75 south lronlage road
Yail, colorado 8'1657
(303) 479-2138 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SU&TECT;
oftlce ol communlty developmenl
ALL CONTRACTORS CI'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THETOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VArL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT
IIARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTTON PARKING & MATERTAL STORAGE
rn sunmary, ordinance No. 5 states that it is unrawfur for anyperson to litter, track or deposit any soir, r""r, sand, debrisor material , incruding trash durnpsteri, portabre toilets ;;a---worknen vehicles. upon any streetl siaewaiil -;ri;y or publicpl?:e or any portion theieof. rhe rigrt_"i_;;t-;n arl. Town ofVail streets and.Igag" is approxirnately 5 ft. off pavenent,.This ordinance wirr. be striitiy -enrorcla uy ttre-iown of VaiIPubric l{orks DeDartment. pers6ns found vihatinq this ordinancewill. be given a 24 hour written i"ti""-ti^;;il;:"=aid narerial.fn the event the person so notified.does not "orply with tbenotice within the 24 hour.time sleciii.-,--irr.-i"[1ic worksDepartrnent wirl remove said mateii.r-"t it"--""p""se ot personnotified. The provisions of thii ordinance affiir not beappricabre to c-onstruction, ruini"rr.rrce or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the =l!tt-"_r"y.
To review ordinance No- 6 in furl, please stop by the Town ofYii-l B"ilding Departnent to obtain a copy. rhanlc you for yourcooperatj_on on this matter.
ead and acknowledged by:
Foreman/Contractorosition/RelaEnEffi (i.e. contractor, owner)
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-2r38
APPLICANT B & B
2818
CONTRACTOR B & B
2B]-B
OWNER LODGE
t74 E
E tect ri cat--->
DRB Fee
Invest i gat ion>
lli Lt CaL l.----)
TOTAL FEES--->
Job Address
Location. . .Parcel No. .Project No.
ELECTRIC, INC.
1/2 NORTH AVE. ,
ELECTRIC, INC.
1/2 NORTH AVE. ,
PROPERTIES INC
GORE CREEK DR,
90.00
.00
.00
3.00
93.00
270I-O82-23-009
PRJ9 6-0054
GRAND JUNCTION,
GRAND JUNCTION,
vArL co 81657
I SSUED
05/re /7ee705/re/tee7
tL /$ /ree7
42-2450
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: 897-0082ELECTRICAL PERMIT
L74 E GORE CREEK DR StaUus. .
LODGE AT VAIL INTERNATIONAppIied.
Issued..
Expires.
Phone:970-2co 8L501
Phoner 970-242-2450co BL501
Description: NEW UNDER GROUND SERVICE Valuation:5,000 . 00
*****************************t***************************** FEE SUl.l14ARy *******t****t*********************************************
TotaI Catcutated Fees--->
AdditionaL f ees--------->
TotaI Permit tee-------->
Payments--------
BALANCE DUE-----
95.00
.00
93.00
93.00
.00
************i****************************************t****************************************************************************
rtem: .06000 ELECTRTCAL DEPARTMENT Dept: BUTLDTNG Division:05/19/7997 CHARLTE action:-ApFn-r,On ERNSTIt'em:' 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division:
************************************************************************t******i**************************************************
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. !'rELD INSPECTTONS ARE REQUTRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.2. ALL FrRE ALA-B!,I_WOBK MUST-BE TNSPECTED ellD ApFAoVED-iiy-----'--'THE TOWN OF VAIL FIRE DEPT
**********************************************************************************************************************************
DECLARATIONS
I. hereby .acknow ledge that r have read.this apptication, fitted out in futt the information requi red, compteted an accurate ptotplan, and state that atl the information provided as required. is correct. I agree to compty riith tire information and pl.ot ptan,to compty lrith atL Town ordinances and state [avs, and to buil,d this structure according io-the Town,s zoning and subdlvisibncodes, design revie!, aPproved, Uniforn Buil.ding code and other ordinances of the Totn appLicabte thereto.
479-2138 oR AT oUR oFFICE FRO 8:0O A 5:0OREOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I.IADE TI,'ENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT
r^Conracc Eag.r-e Counry Asseasors f t""at 970-318-8Q40 fo1 Jarc_el /l . TOWN OF VAfL CONSTRUCTION
PARCEL III}I'I - O97 .2?. aEl PERMIT APPLICATToN FoRM
PERI'IIT /I
DATE: S_tr,-9+
, APPLICATToN !'!UST BE FILLED OUT CoI-IPLETELy OR IT I'!AY NOT BE ACCEnTED
If***** *** * ********* ** ***** *** * PERMIT fNFORI'IATJON ** ** **** *** *********** ** *** * *
^l [ ]-Building I j-Plunbing [X]-Electrical [ ]-Mechanibat [ ]-other
Job Narne: Looer AT vRlL
Lega1 oescription: Lot BIock
Job Address: l?4 E C'oRs CR€EK O'€., VR|L
rtfinS suBprvrsroN:
Ph.
Architect: Z€Hc4! i AssocreTer. Zrvc.Address: Po.B. 191t. Avor cs Bltozo Ph. 9+i - ozs:F
General Description: uilaEnhsu.$ _.
Work Class: [ ]-New [ ]-Alteration [ ]-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Number of Dwelling Units:Number of Accommodation Units:
OTHER:ELEcrRrcAr-,: $ fooo - unJcart*"4
MECHANTCAL: $
t*************************** CoNTRACTOR INFORMATJON *** ******** ********** ** *** *
fgl3rar cortractor: SllEw corrrstpucrro.q Town of Vail Reg. No.-_Address: ?(oo !{oerzor.l 8t Phone Number: 2 +z- qztffi}
Electrical Contractor: BiB 6uEcrrttc,a*c.\ddress: ZStB I
Tor,{n of vail Reg. No.-Q29- Eg. G rnnro Jlrr.lcrr6r.l c6 8ts6t Phone Number: Z4Z-z
?luurbing Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. NO._\ddress: phone Nunber:
Owners Nane: Looce Pr"pe,"rr "s. :r"rc Address:
BUILDING: I
PLI'UBTNG: $,J
TOTAL:
"lechanical Contractor:
),ddress:
r******************************* FOR
]UTLDING PERMIT FEE:
]LUMBING PERUTT FEE:
TECHANTCAL PERMIT FEE:
]LECTRICAL FEE:
)THER TYPE OF FEE:
)RB FEE:
Town of Vall Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
oFFICE USE ***** *** ****** * ********** *** ***
BUTLDTNG PINN CHECK FEE:
PLI'MBTNG PI,AN CHECK FEE:
I'TECHANICAIJ PI'AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON TEE:
CI.,EAN.UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
BUTLDING!
STGNATURE:
ZONTNG:
SIGNATT]RE:
CLEAIT T'P DEPOSIT REfl'TD TO!
75 south tronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 479-21.38 ot 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
su&TEcT:
offlce ol communlty deyclopment
ALL CONTR.,ACTORS CURREMTIJYL REGISTERED WITII TT|ETOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/CO!{MUNITY DEVET,OP}IENT
MARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKTNG & MATERIAL STORAGE
rn sunmary, ordinance No. G states that it is unlawful for anyperson to litter, track. or deposit. any "Jif,-r""i, sand, debrisor naterial, lncluding trash &urnpster3, p-ituri. toirets andworkmen vehicres. upon any streetl sia"waix, -;ii;y or publicp1?:" or any portion theieof. TIre rishr_"i;;t-;n a]t Town ofVail streets and.:g"g= is approxinateiy 5 ft.-6fi pavernent.This ordinance wilr be. str_iliry-enforc3d uy-ite-r"wn of vair.Public l{orks DeDartment. perslns found vieraain; this ordinancewitr. be given a 24 hour written i"[i""-ti-i!ilJi!t="id mareriar.rn the event the person so notified.aoes-not-"iipry with thenotice within the 24 hour.tine-"p""iiiil,"il";"ttic worrcsDepartrnent witr remove said nateii"i-ii-irr""""iil"e of personnotified. The provisions ot trris ordinance shall not beapplicable to clnstruction, nainlenance or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the ,i.jt[_"_r.y.
To review ordinance No. 6 in fu'I, please stop by the Town ofVail Building Department to obtain a copy. rirani you for yourcooperation on this rnatter.
OREYN AN / EL€CTITICRL c,ositionlnel5ffinE$(i.e. contractor, owner)
75 roulh trontage road
Ydl, colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138 or 479-2L39 ottlce of communlty devctopmenl
EUILDING PERI4IT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this peryrrt requires a Town of vail Fire Departnent Approvar,Engineer's. (public 1gtftt reyiew and approvat,'a ptinnini-bepa"t entreview or. Heat th Departm6nt review, "nb'a-i.uid ;i-;;;;";riiainsDepartnent, the estimated time for-a totar "iui.n-iluv"L[l'as tongas three weeks.
f]t cgtnngrgial ('rarge or smail) and ail murti-familv permits wiilhave to follow the above menti6ned maximum requiremlnii.""iesidentialand.small projects shourd tar(e a lesser amount or-iime.' However, ifresidenti'a'l or smaller.projects impact the various alou" mlntioneadepartments with reoard to necessary review,-the; i;;j;"ti'ruyalso take the three-weet< periloJ. -i 'v'r' e'reJs
','
\'i'E.-t')
Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite thispennj.t ag seon as possible. -' - -- -'rr-- ! es e'
I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and timeframe.
v*rL
Corununi ty Devel opment Departnent.
O MEMORANDUM
TO: ALLCONTRACTORSFROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTDATE: MAY 9, 1994RE: WHEN A "PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'lS REQUIRED
Date: 5-ru-q:+
Please answerlhe following questionnalre regarding the need for a'Public Way Permit":
YES NO
1) ls this a new residence? Ns
2) ls demolition work being performed
that requires the use of the right
of way, easements or public propefly?
3) ls any utility work needed?
4) fs the driveway being repaved?
5) ls different acress needed to site
olher than existing driveway?
6) ls any drainage work being done
affecting the right of way, easements,
or public property?
rr /a
5gg Gglcenl e.6Nt&t+c7or--
7) ls a "Revocable Right CI Way Permit'
required?
8) A. ls the right of way, easements or
public property lo be used for staging,
parking or fencing?
B. lf no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or fencing plan required by CommunityDevelopment?
.
lf you answered yes to any of these queslions, a 'Public Way Permit" musl be obtained.
"Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's office or at
Community Development. lf you have any questions please calt Charlie Davis, the Town' ol Vail Construction Inspec{oi at.479-218.
I have read and answered allthe above questions.
Job NamE Contractor's Signature Date {s
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
97 0-47 9-2t38
APPL]CANT B & B
2 818
CONTRACTOR B & B
2 818
OWNER LODGE
T74 E
DRB Fee
Investigation>
tlitl, Cal.t---->
Job AddressLocation...
ParceL No..Project No.
ELECTRIC, INC.1/2 NORTH AVE.,
ELECTRIC, INC.1/2 NoRTH AvE.,
PROPERTIES INC
GORE CREEK DR,
I S SUED
05/rs/ree7
05/re/7se71r/fi/ree7
42-2450
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: E9?-0083ELECTRICAL PERMIT
GRAND JUNCTTON,
GRAND JUNCTION,
VAIL CO 81657
I74 E GORE CREEK DR StaLus...
LoDGE AT VAIL 174 E GORE Applied..2I0I-OB2-23-009 Issued...PRJ96-0054 Expires. .
Phone z 970-2co 81501
Phone z 970-242-2450co 81501
Description: ELECTRICAL REMODEIJ IN LOBBY AREA Valuati-on:10r 000.00
*******i*************************************************** FEE SUfl ARy ******************************************************i**)t
Etectricat---> 1E0.00
.00
.oo
3.00
ToTAL FEES---> 183.00
TotaI Catcutated Fees--->
Add i tionat fees--------->
TotaI Permit tee-------->
Payments--------
BALANCE DUE_-_-
1E3 .00
.00
183.00
183.00
.00
******************t(*********t(*******************************i************************************************************i***i****
Ite.m: .06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT Dept: BUILDING Division:05/19/1997 CHARLTE Action: AFFR-r'On ERNSTItbm:'05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT Dept: FIRE Division:
***********************************************tr*****1*****************************t**********************************************
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
***************************************************i*****t********************************************t***************************
DECLARATIONS
r.hereby'acknowtedge that r have read this apptication, fi ,ed out in ful,t the information required, compteted an accurate ptotptan, and state that at( the 'information pfovided as required.is correct. I agree to compty iith tire information and pl,ot pLan,to compty uith al't Toun ordinances and state [aws, and to buil,d this structure according io- the Tovn's zoning and subdivisioncodes, design revieu approved, uniforn Buil.ding Code and other ordinances of the Town appticabte thefeto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I'IADE TI.IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN AOVANCE BY TELEPHO}IE AI 179-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE TRO}I 8:OO A[ 5:OO PI.I
ri l.
;*Contact Eagle County Asseesors
PERI"IIT #
PERMIT APPLICATTON FORM
DATE: 5.IL.q+
, APPLTCATTON MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAy NOT BE ACCEPTED}I
Il******************** ********* PERMIT fNFORI,IATION ***************** * *** * *** * * * *
't [ ]-BuiJ.ding [ ]-Plumbing [;]-Electricat [ ]-uechanibal [ ]-other
Job Name: Looo!:lr- Vnru Job Address: 1?4 E. Gp:E cr6EK otl .. VatL
Legal Description: Lot Block_ Filing susprvrsroN,
Address:Ph.
Architect: zEAEcr{ i A.ro.. :r,{c.-Address: P,o.A- lgat. Avrn co gl6zo Ph. 9+€t -ozs+
ceneral Description:
work crass: [ ]-New [;]-Atteration t l-Additional [ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Number of Dwelling Units:Nunber of AccommodatLon Units:
]re. 17? -g?fla o"n
TOI{N OF VATL CONSTRUCTTON
Electrical Contracto r: Bi A ELgcr. rc., a,\|c. _.\ddress:lBr
Plumbing Contractor:
Address:
Mectranical Contractor:
Address:
* ****** **** ** *******************FOR
Town of Vail Reg. No.2J.g-E
Phone Nunber: q-to-z+z-zrl6o
Town of Vail
Phone Nurnber:
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
Reg. NO._
3UTLDING PERMIT FEE3
]LUMBING PERMTT FEE3
{ECHANICAL PERMIT FEE:
]LECTRICAL FEE:
)THER TYPE OF FEE:
)RB FEE !
Reg. NO.
oFFICE USE ** *** *** *** ***** ** ******* ******
BUILDING PI,AN CHECK FEE:
PLtl,lBINc PLAN CHECK FEE:
MECHANTCAIJ PIAN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT:
TOTAL PERI'IIT FEES:
BUTI.,DTNG:
STGNATT'RE:
ZONTNG:
SIGNATTIRE:
VALUATION
I
CLEAIT I'P DEPOSIT IEFIIND !O:
75 3oulh tronlage roed
Yail, colorado El557
(303) 479-21.38 ot 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
su&TECT:
offlce of communlly development
ALL CONTRACTORS CT'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH TITETO!{N OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
l,lARCH 16, 1988
CONS?RUCTION PARKING & I,IATERIAL STORAGE
rn suurmary, ordinance No- 6 states that rt is unlawfuJ- for anyperson to ritter, track or deposit. any soir,-roci, sand, debrisor nateriar, incruding trash lunpsterr, port.bt" toirets andworkmen vehicLes. upon-any srreerl "i;;;uik; ;ii;y or pubticp1?9" or any portion theleof. The righr_";_Gt-;n alt Town ofVail streets and.Ig"gs is approxinateiy 5 ft.-Lfi pavenent.This ordinance wilr be. striitiy -enforced by the Town of VailPubl-ic works Deoartment. pers6ns found vi;larin; this ordinancewirl. be given a 24 hour written ""[i""-t"-;;;;;t=aid nateriar.rn the event the person so notified aoes noi-""rprv with thenotice within the 24 hour.tine-=p."iiiil,..i;";"ttic wortcsDepartnrent wirr remove said nateii"r ii-it"-""i"i=e of personnotified- The provisions of ttris-oiai""i"" ;fr5ii nor beapplicable to c-onstruction, urainienance or repair projects ofany street or atley or any utilities i" it"-ii!ii_"-r"y.
To.review ordinance No- 6 rn furr, prease stop by the Tovrn ofvail Buir.ding Department to obtain a copy. rirani you for yourcooperation on this matter.
acknowledged
ositionTnelaElonsh$to Project (i.e. contractor, owner)
75 roulh tronllge ro.d
rell. colorado 81657
l3o3'l 479-2138 or 479-2L39 ottlco of qommunlly doyclopmetrl
. BUILDING PERIiIT ISSUANCE TII'IE FRAME
If this perylt reguires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval,Engineelts. (.public wopks) reyiew and approvai,'i iiiiiir'rii'bipu"t entreview or Hea'lth Departmdnt_review, anb'a_review by the BuildingDepartment, the estimated rime for-a totar ;;;il;"y"iai!'is rongas three weelts.
All corrnercial flarqe or smal't) and all mu]ti-family permits willhave tq follow ttre irove menti6neJ-mi*irum requirements. Res.identia.land.small projects-should take a resser amound or time.' Hoiever, ifresidential or smaller.projects impact the various-auove mlntioneadepartments wi th reqard' to- necessai"y
"eui
en,-ih;;; ;;;j;.ii' ruyalso take the three-weet< perioJ.-
Every.attempt wil'l be made by this department to expedite thispermit.as. soon as possible. -
I' the under5igned, understand the plan check procedure and timeframe.
VAIL
Communi ty Development Department.
MEMORANDUM O
TO: ALLCONTRACTORSFROM: TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTDATE: MAY 9,1994RE: WHEN A "PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'lS REQUIRED
Job Name: Looar sz vnrLDale: sll-q>
Please answerlhe following questionnaire regarding the need for a'Public Way Permit":
YES NO
1) ls this a new residence?
2) lS demOlitiOn work being perfOrmed sEE Ger$aeL c.anr.*cTor a|.|Fo
that requires lhe use of the right
of way, easements or public properfy?
3) ls any utility work needed?
4) ls the driveway being repaved?
5) ls different a@ess needed to site
other than existing driveway?
6) ls any drainage work being done
atfecting the right of way, easements,
or public property?
7) ls a "Bevocable Right CI Way Permit"
required?
8) A. ls the right of way, easements or
public property to be used for staging,
pad<ing or fencing?
B. lf no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or fencing plan required by Community
Development?
lf you answered yes to any of lhese questions, a 'Public Way Permit" must be oblained.
'Public Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's otfice or at
Community Development. ll you have any questions please call Charlie Davis, the Town' of Vaif Construction Inspec{or, at.479-218.
I have read and answered allthe above questions.
Job Name Contractor's Signature Date G
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
97 0-47 9-2138
APPLICANT B & B
2B1B
CONTRACTOR B & B
2 818
OWNER LODGE
I74 E
Etectri cat--->
DRB Fee
Investigation>
t, i L l, Ca l.l.---->
TOTAL FEES--->
Job Address
Location. . .
ParceL No..Project No.
ELECTRIC, INC.
1/2 NORTH AVE.,
ELECTRIC, INC.1/2 NoRTH AVE.,
PROPERTIES INC
GORE CREEK DR,
54.00
.00
3.00
57.00
I S SUED
06/0e/tes7
06/t7 /les7t2/14/tee7
42-2450
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL PERMIT Permit #: E97-0106
174 E GORE CREEK DR Status...
LODGE AT VAIL ADDITION Applied..2\OI-O82-23-O09 Issued...PRJ96-0054 Exoires. .
Phone z 9?O-2
co 81501
Description: ALARM SYSTEM
*******************************t********************r****** FEE SUt4l.lARy
Phone:.97O-242-2450
co 81501
Valuation:3,000 . oo
****************************************************/r**rtxx
GRAND JUNCTION,
GRAND JUNCTION,
vArL co 81657
57-00
.00
57.00
5 7.00
-00
*******************************************************************************************************t**************************
Itqm: .06000 EI_,EqTRICAL DEPARTUENT--,_ Depr: BUTLDTNG Division:06/09/L997 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/AItem:'.05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT ' Dept: FIRE Division:g6/,09/,t997 CHARr_,IE ACtion: NOTE PLANS TO FrRE-onFi.'-o6'/L6'/ree7 MIKE_M AaEion: AFPR eoiiDrrionAi_, ApFnoVer,
***************************************************************t****t****t********************************************************
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. !'IELD TNSPECTIqNS ARE REQUTRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.2. (:ONDITTONAL FrRE ALARM pf,AN APPROVAL - SnS- NOiEEpI_rANS rJACK EU!'FTCTENT DETATL. FAST TRACK nFFnovel GRANTEDoN _ coND r r r oN-_AhL_DEyIQE S, ^ wIB_r NE r LgeAr i CiNl- OitA nAT rOlt-,'- eNpDESIGN CoMPTII wITH NI'PA ?2 AND iov-6nDiIIATICES.--iIISFECrTcjft4!!D FULL FUNcrr_gN_TEq!-IS BEQqTRED. AppROtEr, uxFlnns-wHEi,iINrERNArroNAI.r WING CQNSTRUCTIqN SrARrS. - - Auy-pEFreieNcifrE-'TDENTTFTED qry_ ots^gBrQB_rQ 7 1L121__yugT BE eonnnctED-Ei- gTgt .LACK OF DETAI! DOES NOT CONSTTTUTE AFPRoVAI,-OF FIAHE-As'- "
SUBMITTED. -qU-L!-qOMPLIANCE IS REQUiRNO. AFPOAVAI,-_I5 -E-NAWTNN
AT BUILDER'S RISK.
*******************************************************************************i***********************r**************************
DECLARATIONS
I.hereby acknowtedge that r have read.this apptication, fitted out in fuLl, the information requircd, compteted an accurate pt.otptan, and state that att the infofmation provided as required. is correct. I agree to.compty riitt tit" into.rition and ptot ptan,to compty t'rith atl' Tovn ordinances and state [aws, and io buitd this st ru ctu re.Taccord i ng to'ttr. iown;" i"ni"g *a subdivisioncodes, design revicw approved, Uniform Buitding Code and other ordinances of tire Tonn afpticabte thereto.
Totat Ca [cutated Fees--->
AdditionaI Fees--------->
TotaI Permit Fee-------->
Payments--------
BALANCE DUE-----
REQUESIS TOR INSPECTIONS SHALL 8E I.IADE
'*conEacc Eagle count"rf::i"il" q#i oF vArL coNsrRuclac e70-328-eoao ro.vpl:::i";:" q#i oF vArL coNsrRucrro* o
pARcEi, l|r_ pERMrr AppLrcATroN FoRM
DATE:5-ZC-q"
PERI'IIT #
Ph.
'PPflG-us1
, APPLTCATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTEDrt
[***************************** pERMrr TNFoRMATT.N *****************************
t
\"t ---'
LouJ voL-tAc'€[ ]-Building [ ]-PlunbLng g(l-Electrical [ ]-Mechanibat [t]-other{!""nnsyrr€^^
Job Name: l-oDoe AT vn\L ilob Address:
Legal Description: Lot Block_ filinq srrBDTvrsroN:
owners Nane: LoooE prlopttrres. ]:r,lc,. Address:
Architect: zerrcarq i Assec. :rr.ro.Address: PoB tqa6. AvoN c6 gtrozo ph. qtf - ozS t
General Description:
a/
work class: [ ]-New [ ]-Alteration [ ]-Additional [ ] -Repair [y ] -otherlehooru_
Number of Dwelting Units:Number of Accornmodation Units:
I'llrmber and Type of Fireplaces: cas Appliances
,
* * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** VALUATIONSItsUILDTNG: $ELECTRICAL: $
PLUMBfNG: $MECTIANICAL: $,'i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** CoNTRACTOR INFORMATIONfeneral Contractor: sHAw c6r,ls'r.uc/r or.{\ddress: ego !+or,zo*
Gas Logs_ Wood/pellet
*********************************
f lectrical Contractor: Bt B Euecrero .t,-rJ'2lt1X,';[
\ddress : eBrg Ta
oTHER : t_I, oh___gh1gss_
TOTAL:
***************************
Town of Vail Reg. NO._.
Phone Number: qlo - zqz], JJ
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Nurnber: qro. z4zlEi-
?lumbing Contractor:
\ddress:
,lechanical Contractor:
\ddress:
rrt****************** ************ FOR
]UILDING PERMIT FEE:,LUMBING PERMIT FEE:
TECHANICAL PERMIT FEEs
]LECTRICAL FEE:
.?HER TYPE OF FEE:
IDR FFF.
Town of Vail Reg. No.2b6- E
Phone Nurnber:
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
oFFICE USE *******************************
BUTLDTNG PI,,AN CHECK FEE:
PLWBING PI,AN CHECK FEE:!'IECHANICAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
CLEAN-UP
TOTAL
BUTLDING:
STGNATUP€
ZONING:
SIGNATUFE
VALUATION
']LEAN UP DT,OSIT REFIIND TO:
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-21,38
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEIJOPMENT
NOTE ! THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: 897-01J7
Job AddressLocation...
ParceL No..Project No.
ELECTRTC, rNC.
1/2 NORTH AVE.,
ELECTRIC, INC.
1/2 NORTH AVE.,
PROPERTIES INC
GORE CREEK DR,
8, 5 57.00
.00
.00
3.00
8,560.00
L74 E GORE CREEK DR
LODGE AT VAIL
2LOt-082-23-009
PRJg 6-0054
GRAND JUNCTION,
GRAND .JUNCTION,
VAIL CO 81557
I S SUED
o7 /70/res7
Status. . .Applied..Issued...
Expires. .
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
B&B
2 818B&B
2 818
LODGEI74 E
Phonet 970-242-2450co 81501
Phone : 97 0-242-2450co 81501
Description: ELECTRICAL WORK FOR ADDITION Valuation:500, 000.00
*****************tt**************t******t****t*****t******* FEE SUltlARy ***t***********t******i***************t*******************
Etectri cat--->
DRB fee
Investigat ion>
Ui tt Cal.l,---->
TOTAL fEES--->
Totat Catcutated Fees--->
AdditionaI Fees--------->
Totat Permit Fee-------->
Paynents--------
BALANCE DUE----
8,560.00
.00
8,560.00
8,560.00
.00
*******i********ff********i**********#******t****i**********************************************************i****************i***
Dept: BUILDING Divrsron:
Dept: FIRE Division:
**************t*************t*******************t******************************************i**************************************
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIETD TNSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
********t**********i**********************t****************************************i*****************t****************************
DECLARATIONS
r hereby ackno!,tedge that I have fead this aPPl'ication, fil,ted out in ful,l. the intormation required, compteted an accufate ptotptan, and state that att the information provided as required. i.s correct. I lgree to compty riith tire in'tormition and ptot ptan,to compty Hith atL Tovn ordinances and state [aus, and to buil,d this structurc according io'thc Tovn,s r"ning
"no subdivisioncod.s, design revicw approved, uniform Buitding code and other ordinance" oi ittu iown appticabte thereto.
rLqm: -06000 ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT07110/1997 DAN Action: AppRItem:'.05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT07/10/7997 DAN Action: AppR
479-213E 0R AT ouR oFFIcE FRofi 8:00 Al,t 5:00REOUESTS TOR II{SPECTIONS SHALL BE TADE TIIENTY-TOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE 8Y TELEPHONE AT
,+.Conta-ct Eagle County
at 970-328-8640 for
PARCEL /I:PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
DATE. O.:+_ oA_1+
APPLTCATTON MUST BE FILLED OUT COI.IPLETELY OR IT MAY N"rl$t^0""t11""****************************,r pERMrr rNFoRl{Arron ****"Tfit.c0ililfr.tE{t,$bv,l*i**
t i-Buitding [ ]-prunbing Q<r-Erectrical [ ]-MechanilYr" "i i'-ottr"t
i:. :
-:.
l_ : :....:. :.: :
-."
:...
*'r PERMTT rNFoRr{Arron ......16t[96$
Job Name: L-oDce AT vnrL Job Address: taLE_, G"R€ q!5le.r$rL
Lega1 Description: Lot Block_ Filing sunorvrsrou,
Owners Narne: Lbltel e8lleqrrEi, fNe-, Address:Ph.
Architect: :zEtltrrt q Artoc,, tNc-.Address: Fo,B. tql6 AYoN co gtr,zo Ph. 94q-ozs+
General Description:
work class: txl-New [ ]-Alteration f*l-Additlonal [ ]-Repair [ ]-other
Number of Dwelling Units:Nunber of Acconmodation Units:
Nlmber and Tvpe of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances Gas Logs_ wood/pel1etI
f********************************* VALUATTONS *********************************IBUILDINGs $
PLUMBTNG: SE
ELECTRI cAf, : f_5ooO9-q_qpMECHANICAL: f OTHER:
TOTAL:
INFORMATION ***************************'t*************************** CoNTRACTOR
Seneral Contractor: SHRw coNs.riucr, o Fl
.1Ql -at 7jSlectri-cal Contractor: EiB'(ueciaic.':r,,rc, _
\ddress:
\ddress:
?lunbing Contractor:
rddress:
'Iechanical Contractor:
\ddress:
(******************************* FOR
Town of Vail Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
-{
Reg. NO.
Reg. NO.
oFFrcE usE *******************************
BUILDING PIAN CHECK FEE:
PLWBING PIAN CHECK FEE:
UECEANICAL PI-.AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATTON FEE:
CLEAN.UP DEPOSTT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
Town of Vail
Phone Nurnber:
Town of Vail
Phone Nurnber:
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
]UTLDING PERMIT FEE:,LUMBING PERMTT FEE:
IECHANTCAI PERMIT FEE:
;LECTRTCAL FEE:
THER TYPE OF FEE:
)RB FEE:
BUILDING:
STGNATT'RE:
ZONTNG:
SIGNAtrI'RE!:ornnents:
]LEAN UP DEPOSIT REFITND !O:
75 3outh trontage road
Yail, colorado 81657
(303, 479-21.38 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJEC?:
olflce of communlty deyelopment
ALL CONTR,ACTORS CURRENTLYL REGISTERED WITE THETOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC I{oRKS/COMMUNITy DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 16, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERTAL STORAGE
(i.e. contractor, owner)
rn sunnary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for anyperson to Litter, track or deposit. any r"ir,-r""i, sand, debrisor material , including trash luurpsteri, po=t.uie-'toilets andworkmen vehicres. upon any streetl siaewair, -;ii;y or public
-q1?9" or any portion theieof. The right-"i-riy 6n au Town ofVail streets and roads is approiirrateiy 5 ft. -Lfi pavenent.This ordinance h'lrl be. striEliy--enforced by the Tovrn of vairPublic I'{orks Departrnent. pers6ns found ,ri6raiing this ordinanceYill be given a 24 hour writi"n--n"[i""-t"-;;;;;""."id mareriar.In the event the person so notified.does not- cornp:.y with thenotice within the 24 hour.time-=p""iiiil,";;"-;"[tic wort<sDepartrnent wirr remove said mateii"1 ii-tn"-'"*p"i"e of personnotiried. The provisions or tnis-"iair""i]! :fr5ii not beappticable to cbnstruction, ,uini"rr"rrce or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities i" ir,"-rigii_"_".y.
To review ordinance No. 6 in fur-r, prease stop by the Town ofYlll B"ilding Departmenr to obtain a copy. riranic you for yourcooperat,5_on on this matter.
luwn
75 toulh tronlaga roed
nll, colorado 81657
(303) 479-2L38 ot 479-2L39 offlce of communlty developmerrt
BUILDING PERI{IT ISSUANCE TIME FMI,IE
If this perytlt requirres a Town of vai'r Fire Departnent Approval,Engineer''s. (.public fg.frt review and approvat,'a ptinntni'bep."t entreview or.Heatth Departmint review, rnh' a-"eui.; Li-il;"driioingDepartnent, the estimated time for a totar "eui"n-il.y"i.["'is r5ngas three weeks.
All conrnercial (large or sma'll ) and all mu]ti-family permits wi.llhave to fo'llow the above menti6ned maximum requireminli. iesioentia.land.small projects_shourd take a 'l esser amouni of time. However, ifresidential or smaller.projects impact tne vJrious;il;. ,n!ntioneadepartments with reqard to-necessai^y revitw, tt .r" pr.j".ti"ruyalso take the three-week period.
Every attempt wi]l be
']g9e by this departrnent to expedite thispenni't as s.qon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the pl an check procedure and timeframe..
Communi ty Devel opment Department.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
o MEMORANDUM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAY 9, 1994
WHEN A ''PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'tS REOUIRED
Job Name: LooaDate: +-oo lq*Rteas arding lhe need for a'public Way permit':
ls this a new residence?
ls demolition work being performed
that requires the use of the right
of way, easements or public propefly?
ls any utility work needed?
ls the driveway being repaved?
ls ditferent aocess needed to site
other than existing driveway?
ls any drainage work being done
atfecting the right of way, easements,
or public property?
YES
W/" e'c'
NO
1)
z',)
3)
4)
s)
5)
7') ls a'Revocable Right CI Way Permit"
required? .
8) A. ls the right of way, easemenis or
public property to be used for staging,
parking or fencing?
B. It no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or fencing plan required by Community
Development?
lf you answered yes to any of these questions, a 'Public Way Permit" musi be obtained.
'Public Way Permit' applications may be obtained at the Public Work's office or at
Community Development. lf you have any questions please call Charlie Davis, the Town
of Vail Construction Inspector, at 479-2158.
I have read and answered allthe above questions.
DateJob Name Contrador's Signature
*-/,
oI/02/s8 11:33 t89?0 488 0295
o
NWCCOG @oo1o
NWCCrc Etwdor Inspection progran
M: /J-ft-?n
Cr,6+nrs
FtenkKihn
To;
Frgtt:
Locarion: /0{ FAf epq CpgeU 2&rcVArt da ftaaV
Permit t{Lmbec tvtu€tue # ?a-ae?
F ttc€/.9r$ -c&.atthcsoratocatisrwas inspedect andbs{rxt onard a ffi4Firnr klEpecrion cartmcate hs been rNqj3d.
ulf/f,ila/Uqm {1dA,gd + {g€pe{
Cotmrents:
s,nran,o €rtag&A-^
Qqws f&ill oF v,4tL
sroract W^tang hDef Af VL/L
tr EfoetsPlff Revisw
fi ef"mr Ts€tstd lrspeaion
EletrerTlpe: r(fpfu ?kSAleE
tr The plarr travp been ralfrluerl sd hnrd to corfuin b ail sppltcable Atifsl f 7.rardtEC cod.s-
3Ud*billgBtiEn.rrrr
T,O'dN OF VAIL75 S. FRONTAGE ROADVAIL, CO 8L657970-479-2738
E tectri ca l.--->
DRB Fee
Investigat i on>
tli l. L Cat l.---->
TOTAL FEES--->
DEPARTMENT OF COMMI'NITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
JOBS]TE AT ALL TIMES
Permit t: 897-0L62
Job Address
Location. . .Parcel No..Project No.
1,332.N
.(n
.00
5.00
1,535.00
ISSUED
o8/04/ree7
Lo /o6 /1,ee7o4/o4/tee8
LODGE AT VAIL INTERNATIONApptied.2101-082-23-009 reiued..
I74 E GORE CREEK DR Status. .
Expires.PRJ9 6-0054
APPLICANT B & B ELECTRTC, INC.28L8 L/2 NORTH AVE., GRAND JUNCTTON,CONTRACTOR B & B ELECTRIC, INC.28t8 L/2 NORTH AVE., GRAND JUNCTTON,OWNER LODGE bROPNRITES IN'L74 E GORE CREEK DR, VArL CO 8L657
Phone: 97 0-242-2450co 81s01
Phonez 970-242-2450co 81s01
Dcscription: FIRE ALARM sYsTEM FoR INTERNATIoNAL wrNva].uation:75, 000 . oo
*******ffi*******rffir****tif,*f,ffrr*ff*ffiffii*frff**ft
FEE SUllllARy ffi**t*ffi**ffi***ffi**trf*****i******l***ffr***ffirffi
Total, CatcuLated Fees---> 1 , j35 .00
Additional, F!€s-------> .00
Totr f, Pcmit Fets-----> 1,315.N
Payrcntg-_--_
EAUtfiCE DUE----.00
tr***i****t***tffi**r*******f**ffi***'FtrJnt 'frlf,f,t***r**f,tffi*ffif,f,***fiffii**t******i**ffi*fff,i*r***r*f,**f,ri*rftrr**ffiffi**
rlem: O6OOO-ELE9!RIC4,L DEPARTMENT DepI: BUILDING Division:
ii1ft1/,b'2?4':EttB:B; ;tft FrtEffi
' u::l' ::*L r E DAvis " ; ; ; ;;" "'" ii.,:
"
ion,r0/02/L99? MrKd-M---[aEio;i; AppR Fire lrarm-/'i"ti'iiinq L)J-
*f,**rt*ffi**ffi**tffi***ffi**ft***ffiffit.f,iffi****t*ffiffi**ffi*ftr***tt*******tffiffi'.}/hffir/rfit**ffi*********ffi*t**
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
*t*ffi*ffi***********t********ti ffi
DECLARATIONS
I. hereby .acknovtedge that,I hrvc Fcad.this eppl'ication, f i l,l,cd out in futl, thc infornation rcqui red, compl,ct.d !n accurate plotpLan, and statc thrt rl'l' thc lnforration prolidetl as rlquired is .o"i..i. i
"g.1" to coepLy Uith the inforoatiofl and pLot pl,an,to conpLy uith att Tonn ordinanccs -and stlte [avs, ind io buiLd thig structure according to thc Torrn's zoning end subdivisioncodes, dcslgn reviev rpprov.d, uniforn BuiLding c6oe anO othar ordinrncrs of thc Toun appl,icabLe thereto,
REAUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I{ADE TIIENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
97 0-47 9-2]-38
NOTE:
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
l"lechani ca t--->
P Lan Check--->
Invest igation>
uiLl. cal.t----> 3.00
o
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED
MECHANICAL PERMIT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: M96-0161
Job Address.... 174 E GORE CREEKLocation . 174 E GORE CREEKParceI No..... : 2101-082-23-009Project Number: PRJ96-0054
Status. . .
AppJ-ied. .
Issued...
Expires. .
co 80216
co 80216
co 816s7
Valuation:
DR
DR
I S SUED
!0 /or/Les61.0/ts/Ls96
o4 /t3 /ree7
*********************************Jr************************* FEE SUt4ttARy ************************************************i***i**i**
Description:
MECH FOR RESTAURANT AND REMODEL
F i rep [ace Information: Restficted:
KIMMEL MECHANICAL, INC.
3700 E. 4LST AVE., DENVER,
KIMMEL MECHANICAL, TNC.
3700 E. 41ST AVE., DENVER,
LODGE PROPERTIES INCI74 E GORE CREEK DR, VAIL
#0f Gas AppI i ances:
560.00 Restuarant PLan Revi ew-->145.00 oRB Fee--------.00 TOTAL fEES-----
Phone t 303-322-8144
Phone: 303-322-8144
28, 300.00
#Of tlood/Pa L tet:#0f 6as Logs:
.00 Total Catcutated Fees--->.00 Additional, Fees--------->728.00 Total Permit Fee-------->
Payments-------
728.00
.o0
728.00
728-O0
Dept: BUILDING Division:
Dept: FIRE Division:
Itqm: ,O51OO BUILDING DEPARTMENTLO/15/1996 CHARLIE Action: AppRItEm:' O56OO FIRE DEPARTMENTIO/15/1996 CHARLIE Action: APPR N/A
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. !'IELD INSPECTIONS ABE REQUTRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLTANCE.2^. gqugq TIoN 4rB__Ig REQUIRED pER sEc. 60j 0F- rHu-rsii--0Me;-'--'3. INSTALLATION-!4qST CONFORM TO MANUFACTURES- TNSTNOETTOII'S-AUOTO APPENDIX CHAPTER 2]. OF THE 1991 UMC.4. GAS APPLTANCES SHALL BE VENTED ACCORDiNG TO CHAPTER 9 AND_ glral,r., TEBMTN4TE 4S_SpECTFTED rN SEC. e06 OF rnE--rs9r 0u-Cl-s. AqgEss To HEATINq EQUTPMENT MUST eOllpl,i wrrH--Sne .sos-eNo703 0F THE 1991 UMC.6. FoTLERS SHAL-L EE-MQUNTED oN Fr.,,ooRs oF NoNcoMBUsrrBLE coNsr._ UNLESS LISTED FOR MOUNTING ON COMBUSTIBLE-FL6ORiNG;- ---'-''
7 . pEBl4 i Tr B!ANq _At{Q qqDE ANAI,YS r S MIUST - eE-FOSTED--Ii.i-l,reCHeN r cALROOM PRIOR TO AN INSPECTION REOUEST8. DRATNAGE oF MECHANTCAL RooMs eotttAittrNc HEATTNG oR Hor-wATERgqppl,y BoTLEB.F^$HAL BE EQUTPPED wrrH A FtooR Dnaix--Fnn.Sic;2119 0F THE 1991 uMc.
********************************************************************************
DECLARATIONS
I hct'.by acknoutedge that I hrvc read thi! apptication, fltted out in futt thc intorration rcquird, corptctcd !n accuratc ptotptan, and state that atl. the inforration pFovidcd as rcquircd is co.r.ct. I agree to cotp(y sith thc iniormtion and pl,ot il,an,to corpty vith rtt Tosn ordinances and ststc tavs, end to hJitd structur. according to the Tosnr s zoning end subdivisioncod.s, design rcvieu approved, Uniforn Buitding codc rnd other th. Toun appticebtt th.frto.
REOIJESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE }IADE TI,IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN
SIGNAIURE OF OIII{ER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIIISELF AND OI.INER
5E OR AT oFFICE FRolt 6:00 Atl 5:00 P
^ !*coutact Eagle county a3res8or3
t-"ff.95:28-8540 for Parccl #.
lr.-
Offlce
TollN OF VlrL coNslltuellol'
PER}TT AEPIJCASTON FONI,TDAllEr
IPERIIII *
't-/' !--
, APPTJCATION I{I'ST BE EIIJ,ED OIIT COUFI..BIEI,Y ON, IT IAY ilqT 8g ACGEPIEDUIt*!.*r+****!rt*****t*tr+r******* plRttIT IIIFOnATfOlil *:rr*i!r,r:r'rirrr*r*trrtrIr*trrrtrl)t l-Building ]-Plr'-ring [ ]-Electrlcal =lteehdni-eal I J-othcrtob NaEe!lF\,fob Addiees:
I€gaI oescrLptionr Ict Slock_ Flttng
onners lfnsei orren| gxpress &Fcl aoar.""r3
Architectr ?nnr,Ilcn _ ad6ress:
t
cI
ratd /<,nd
1ff"t
anit ?1pc of Fireplaces: Gas Appliances Gas r,ogrs_ Ioodr/pellet .
ft ** **** * r* tt ltt a ** i:t* a* tt,r+* a *** * * t- - - - ':: r-i' x-r t*tt ** * Vf,sf1PIS^E:Ittlti!.tt!ttat**ra:l******-r***r*a
fY tr ,{2' ' ct t(? /BUILDIIIG: t _ EI,ECIRICA'L|,I_*_---, onm,r,eItrtUBfNG: rF.rrrlrF.rr?. r-fiZf==--r^,
lirJt'rutrdG:
t UEcEAmcaI'! r:rFF?b ;dffi;
-
4d$i.:li::#;:1"*.lli.ll?iiT;:-;;: zfiN.lddrcse:
General Descriptl.on:*-o-L
work elass: [ ]-Ner I J-Altelalion t J-Mdirlon"f f l]nepatr I l-"'tbr=llr:Eb.! of Dnelllng Unl,ts:Nurber of Accsmodadlon galts:
Phone l{Unbeti
ElEctrlcal ContractorsAddrcss:lofn of vail
Phonc ltuDber:
7 Tzs
PluDblng
Address:
l{ectranlcal Contractor:Addr.ss:
ATEER TIIPE OF FEE:
DR.;A FEEr
Tovn of Vail Req. No.2tbLPgtrone Nurber, 8t 3ZZ@
torrn of vaff nee, llo.2o4 F\.Phone xunbo-.€
't*t t!t*ti: a*t t *tt t+*** !r** a * * * tt * * *BI'ITDI}IG PERIfIT EgE!PI.t)UBItf6 PERIITT FEE:
rycEANrcrL EaRHI! FEE:EI,ECTRTCAI, EEE,
f'OR OFFfCE USE rr*lr***t***t*a*****r*i!*****.i!|*t
BUII.DTNC PI.AN CEECX EPE;
-P_qlFrIg Pr4N ctrEqR FEE:pq!ryIgAr. pran crr& rur:RECREATTOA' EEE:CLErN-IIP DEpOSf?:
TOTAT PERUTT TEES:
E(rILDrlTG:
SIC}trITT'RE:
zot(rrc:
SIGNAIURE:
sQ.ra.
t0oa IVJ 9T.ZZ 96/9A/80
Printed by Charlie Davis t0/10:21am
Fromr Charlie DavisTo: Chuck FeldmannSubject; fwd: todge at vail
---NOTE==--===========a0 / 02 /95==Z :40am=
Chuck I have a mechanical permit ap in forthe lJoclge at vail ( international wing) .
Have We accepted plans on this and have
You reveiwed then for approval ?
Fwd=by: =Chuck=Feldman=L0 / 02 /96==9: 07am=
F'wd to: Charlle Davi6
charlie i need stamped eng drawings ofwhick i have not received yet..
Page: 1
[0f ffinlt*ng::;;|1::t,
[ngneefng COnSul{Onls, lnC I eo Eox 5740, Avan, t0 il62a
v A I L c o L o R e o o | 970-949-ll9l fox: 949-1959
TO: Yail@tnmunlhTDevelqment
111aouth Front4e Road
Yail, C.O Arc51
t^E ARE 9ENDING Yd): 0
iLems:
O thop dril)inge
0 C.apg ol lef-t-er
LETTER OPPTNsMITTAL
o^IEz 1O4*% | \Eo* qb3b5.O1
Attn: Mr. CharlieDavis
RE: Arlberq R*l,auranl
lpdqe at-Yall
0 change orde? 0
?10/o4/qb t4echani(€l and ?lumblnq ?rinLs (*aled)
Att:,ched 0 Under separale cnver via
0 Printe 0 ?lane 0 Amplee 0
t-he lolla tina
9peclFlatlons
below;0 Revieued0 ?urnbhed as c.orrecl,ed0 RevieuJ e Reeubmlt0 ?ejeoted
O FRINT9 RETURNEP AFTER LoAT.I To U5
IHE€iE ARE TR,,AI{SMITTED as chec\ed0 For appranal0 For Vour use0 Ae requeeled0 For review E cnmmenL
O FORBIWDVE
REMARKs:
Charlie,
tlre undersLand gou need 3 sels oF sealed mechanical drawinqs Lo compleLe
Lhe permiL For Lhe ArlbergResLauranL aL Lhe Lodge aLYail. lt gou have ang
quesLions, please call.
OOT( 'lO: 1. Laa; Zehren 4 Associaleg
aloNED Nor een Mct-1ahon
F *IA.A)Rffi ARE NOT A6 NOTED. KINDLY NOT]FY U5 AT ONCE
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 81657
97 0-419 -2138
Job Address. . .
Location
Parcel No.....
Project Number
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON
MECHANICAL PERMIT
JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
Permit #: M96-0177
I74 E GORE CREEK DR
LODGE AT VAIL
2t0t-082-23-009
PRJ96-00s4
I SSUED
t0 /25 /ree 6
r0/2e/ree6
04 /27 /tee7
Status . . .Applied..
Issued...
Expires. .
APPLICANT ALL-STATE FIRE PROTECTION/
6045 E 76TH I*I2, COMMERCE
CONTRACTOR ALL-STATE FIRE PROTECTION,
6045 E 76TH #72, COMMERCEOWNER LODGE PROPERTIES INCI74 E GORE CREEK DR, VAIL
INC
crTY co 80022
INC
CITY CO 80022
co 81657
Phone : 3 0 3 2I8 3 9 0 l
Phone: 3032883901
9,655.00
fOf llood/Pal. Let:
*******t**i*********i***i*t******************************** FEE SUl,ll.lARy *************t********************************************
Description:
FIRE SPRINKLER SYS FOR ARLBERG RESTUARANT
F i reptace Information: Restricted:fof Gas App I i ances:
Valuation:
,0t Gas Logs:
.00 Totat Catculated Fees--->.00 Additional, Fees--------->253.00 Totat Permit Fee-------->payments-------
l'lechani ca [--->
P lan check--->
Investigation>
l,liLL CaLt---->
200.00 Restuarant Ptan Rev'i elr-->50.00 DR8.OO TOTAL FEES-----
3.00
253. O0
.00
253 . O0
255 - 00
**t***********************************************************r***r***i****************llllffi-lli;iiii;;iiiiiii************il?***
I!eE! ,q!1q0_EqTI,DING DEPARTMENT_ --,- Depr: BUTLDTNG Division:IO /25 /7996 CHARLIE Acr j_on : APFR N,/AIt€.m:'.05600_qIRE DEPARTI4ENT ' Dept: FIRE Division:I0/.25/.1996 CHARLTE AcEi-on; NorE FrRE DEPT ApFftovAi"flno,D -'
IQ'/,2_g'/,Igg6 MrKE M Aaai-on: AppR rine sFKl,n.'wi"dofrilrtibu6lO'/25'/l-996 MIKE--}.{ Action: AFFn
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. !'IELD INSPECTIO\F-AtsE BqQqIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.2. EIBE-DEPT APPRoVAL Is REo,D pRroR ro Fir.rAi--clo3. CHANGE PIPE BETWEEN NODES 12 4N0-13-TO-2"1/Z-iIICH, ADD HEADr^N_I_,gpBy. DE_LETE EEAD$ TN COOLERS (2), AoD'llna-os-AeijvE "-"-
qggLEB,_ _ggNrBoL VALVES ARE NO! AppROfto Fon--riisiar,I[iion rr.rT_H-E_rqNNE . qqNVEBSTON OF CLASS 1 STANDPIPSS-to-CoMEiuarr6i.iWET RISERS SUBJECT TO FINAL HYDRO AN-D_INSFECiiON..---^'.^---''
**************************************r.**********************************!k******
DECLARATIONS
I
-
hereby .acknow ledge that r have read this apptication, f il,l,ed out in futt the information required, compteted an accuiate ptotptan, and state that atI the information provided as required.is correct. I agree to compl,y uith tire iniormation and ptot ptan,to compty t'ri th aLl' Town ordinances and state [aws, and io buiLd this structure according io'tn" io"n;" i""l"g ""a subdjvis,ioncodes, design reviev appfoved, Uniforn Buil,ding code and other ordinances of the town appLicabl,e thereto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE NADE TIIENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE gY TELEPHONE AI 179-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROII 6:00 AI.I 5:OO PH
fl (* rrt-,,r ft6il/u'ft6/1'
TOWN OF VAIL DEPARTMENT OF COMI,TTJNITY DEVEI-,,OPMENT
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 8L657
97 0-479-2L38
***************************************************************************
CONDITTONS
Perrnit #y196-OL77 as of LO/25/96 Status: APPLIED***************************************************************************
Perrnit Type: I'{ECHANICAL PERMIT Applied: Lo/25/L996
Applicant: ALL-STATE FIRE PROTECTION, INC Issued:
3032883901 To Expire:
Job Address: L74 E GORE CREEK DR
Location: I.,,ODGE AT VAIL
Parcel No: 2101--082-23-009
Description:
FIRE SPRTNKLER SYS FOR ARLBERG RESTUARANT
Conditions:1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
2. FIRE DEPT APPROVAL fS REQ'D PRIOR TO FINAL C.O
3. CHANGE PIPE BETWEEN NODES ]-2 AND ].3 TO 2 L/2 INCH. ADD HEAD
IN LOBBY' DEIJETE HEADS IN COOI,ERS (2) , ADD HEADS ABOVE
COOLER, CONTROL VAI.,,VES ARE NOT APPROVED FOR INSTALI,ATION IN
THE TUNNEL, CONVERSION OF CI.,ASS 1 STANDPIPES TO COMBINATION
WET RISERS SUSJECT TO FINAL HYDRO AND INSPECTION.
VOWN OF VAIL CONSTRUqIION
PERI.{IT APPLICATTON FORM
DATE. to-?-qb
5-'o'_ ,:(:,::t /
7O "' oc>7c/ PERl"lrr
//h(c t 7 7
, APPLICATIoN MUST BE FrI,LED OUT COMPLETELY OR IT MAy NOT BE ACCEpTEDv
f,i* ** ****** ***'t********* ******* PER!{rt r}rFoRuATroN **********r********!rr**** ****rt
1 l-Building [ ]-ptuobing [ ]-Electrical fl-t{echanicat [ ]-other
Ph.
Ph.
TOTAL: t_
***************************
Town of Vail Reg. No.3ZOS
Phone Number: JgF ,egO/-
Mechanical Contractor:
Address;
********************************FOREUTLDING PERMIT FEE:
PLUMBING PERMIT FEE:
MECHANTCAIJ PER}IIT FEE:
ELECTRTCAI.I FEE:
OTHER TYPE OF FEE:
DRB FEE:
Town of VaiI Reg. No.
Phone Number:
Iown of VaiI .Reg. NO.
Phone Nurnber:
Town of VaiL Reg. NO.
Phone Number:
oFFICE USE *******************************
BUTLDING PIAN CHECK FEE:
PLUMBTNG PI,AN CHECK'FEE:
!.TECHANTCAL PI,AN CHECK FEE:
RECREATION FEE:
CLEAN-UP DEPOSTT:
TOTAL PERMIT FEES:
Contractor:
BUILDTNG:
STGNATURE:
ZONING:
SIGNATURE:
Job Nane: fCOl€ Resrnurc.rJob Addressr t?rl €, A6CE ?eFF\ l&
Block_ filing susprvrsroN,
Address:
Address:
General Description: RdsfOufsrff
work class: fl-llew [ ]-Atteration [ ]-Additional t l-Repair [ ]-other
Nurnber of Dwelling Units:Nunber of Accorrmodation Units:
tqrnber and Type of Fireplaces: Gas Appliancesv+ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VALUATTONS
Gas Logs_ Wood/pel1et
*********************************
BUILDING: I ELECTRICAL: $OTHER: $rNG: $MECHANfCAL: $
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *^* * * * * * * CoNTRACTOR INFORMATION; FEE 'a.lAddress:
Electrical Contractor:
Address:
Plunbing
Address:
Legal Description: Lot
Owners Name:
Architect:
CLEAN I'P DEPOSIT REFIIND TIO:
75 soulh lrontage .oad
nailr coloredo glGST
(3osl 479-2138 or 419-2L39 ottlce of oommunlty dovctopmQnl
BUILDING PERI{IT ISSUANCE TII4E FMIIE
If thr's permit requl'res a Town of Vail Fire Departnent Approval ,Ensineer's (pubtt. T:fl l;;i;'.il'rpi"ou.t, a plannins Departmentrevrew or Health Department_review, ,nl.u.,review by the 6uilding_i;oi[Hl.,l;"ll: ur.truted time ror'a-total review ,.y.il1".as lons
All cornmercial (laroe or small) and al.l multi_famiiy permits willhave to forow itre Sbove menu6neJ-maximum requirements. Residentiarand smalI projects shourd tut("-;-i";lr"amount.of time. However, ifresidentiar or sma'r9r,projects iil;;i'the various above mentioneddepartrnents with' reoa.rd' to-r"""ri"ii-i"ui"", these projects mayalso take the three week period.
Every attempt wr'''r be made by this department to expedite thispemit as soon as possible.'
i;.lil undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time
shee t wa i tuFnEd-TnT-TfiEDate WoiI
Development Department.
o'
75 south tronlage .oad
vail, colorado 81657
(3o3't 479-21.38 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
offlce ol communlty deyelopment
ALL CONTR.ACTORS CT'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THETOWN OF VATL
TowN OF VAIL PUBLIC WoRKs/coMMUNITy DEVELOPI,IENT
l.tARcH 16, 1988
CONSTRUqTION PARKING E UATERTAL STORAGE
rn surnnary, ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawfur for anyperson to litter, track or a"po"it, ""V "oif]-.;;k, sand, debris;:.ffiffTlii"rtl:r"dins trash-iuii=t"r=, porrable toitets and
_qr ?s" ;, ;;i-;;;.!ii:.ilI.if f
..i;"=:i;illlli_;li"I";:, l*:i:-",Vail streetJ ana_Ig"g= is afproiinateiy s ft. 6fi-pavement.This ordinrnc'e wilr be strilliy"Jnforced by the Town of Va'lPublic works o"oarinent:--;;;;;": found "ihuli"q this ordinancewill be siven a 24 hour r.iit"""i"ii""-t.-iiiJilr="id ruareriar.In the event the person so notifi"d.9g": not cornply with thenotice within an:^31 rro"i-tii"-Jieciriea, the puttic worksDepartment will renove said nateri.r _.t in" -""p"i!e or personnotified' The orovisions-of-trtli otainance shirr nor beapplicable to c-onstruction, ,"irrt.r,..ge 9f repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilitres in the right_a_way.
To.review ordinance ll:-a-i, IuIl, please stop by the Town of:::i"3:il3i"g,o:f,if*i*"::"di;il a copv. ri'",,i you ror your
rQ //a
tion/ReT ationship (i.e. contractor, owner)
Zoz*"'or[.,^l*iil o
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Dute: September 16, 1996 From: Tim Losa
To: Dan Stanek Project: Lodge at Vail
Company: Town of Vail - Building Inspector Project No: 94889.01
Fax Number: 479.2452 No. of Pages: 3
Re: Fire Protection System Copies To: See Below
Dan:
Enclosed is the letter to confirm the conclusions from our September 16, 1996 meeting. Please let me know as
soon as possible ifthere are any other issues that need to be resolved in order to receive our permit.
Thanks.
Tim Losa
Project Manager
cc: Jim Ellerbrook Clark Atkinson
Noreen McMahon Scott Lowry
John Volponi Mike McGee
Roger Collins Andy Knudtsen
Jay Peterson
Architecture.Planning.Interiors.Landscape Architecture
P.O. Box 1976 Avon, Colorado 81620 (970) 949-0257 Fax (970) 949-1080
The above is considered correct unless response to the contrary is received within 7 days from the above date.
S:\PROJADMI.I\94889\FAXES\DS9609 I 6.TRL
Z E H R E N
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
September 16,1996
Mr. Dan Stanek
Building Inspector
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado,81657
Re: The Lodge At Vail - Intemational Wing
Building Permit
Dan:
This letter is to confirm the conclusions reached in our September 16, 1996 meeting conceming the
fire protection system for The Lodge at Vail.
It was my understanding that the existing six inch fire protection line in the lodge mechanical tunnel
would not be adequate to serve the fue protection needs of the existing Lodge at Vail, Lodge
Apartment Condominium, and the proposed International Wing. To supplement the existing line,
we would propose to extend the existing dead end six inch line from it's present location at the
northwest comer of the Lodge Tower Condominium with a minimum six inch line to the proposed
International Wing where it would be connected with the existing line to form a loop. The Arlberg
Restaurant, which is scheduled for completion on December l, 1996, would be temporarily
connected to an existing riser until the full system is operational the following year.
A connection between the existing dead end six inch line and the existing line on Gore Creek Drive
would be studied by Alpine Engineering and proposed to both the Town of Vail and the water
district as it's installation would coincide with a proposed storm sewer improvement from the Lodge
at Vail parking lot to intersection of Gore Creek Drive and Willow Bridge Road.
ARCHITECTUR[.PLNNNINC. INTERIORS.LANDSCAPT AR(JI IITf:CTURE
PO. Bcrx f 976 Avr>n, Color.rrlo 81620, \970) 949-0257 FAX (970) 949 l(XlO
Mike McGee of the Town of Vail Fire Department stated that he will accept flow tests recorded
September 15, 1996, de-rated 68.8% for peak demand, for hydraulic calculations. He had also stated
that he would release the building permit pending the release of this letter.
Sincerely,
Tim Losa
Project Manager
Z,ebrenand Associates
94889.00/94889.01
Mike McGee
Andy Knudtsen
Noreen McMahon
Jim Ellerbrook
Chris Gibbler
Clark Atkinson
Scott Lowry
John Volponi
Roger Collins
Jay Peterson
File
\o
v Ar L r[$*P"8f,',#.,,pEil
r
n' sPPo
"o,uJ
tI" :a:;i;: 5't*=' + s' eE
-FF
{ uXa""}iio't ''tsfc;f"I)il
oFitrflHoPv
S.Simplex
fSimplex
PROJECT:
CONTRACTOR:
ARLBERG RESTAURANT
B & BELECTRICCOMPANY
TYPE DESCRIPTION
SIIAW CONSTFUCT]ON
G€rErd gorfiactor
Rec'd tt/6
R€vlewecr- tor General
Arrangements su bj ect to
comdianca with ail con-
tragl requiremgnts and
14998West 5th Arcnue
Frontage Road, Suite 11600
Golden, CO 80401
Sales (303) 277-9733
SeMce (303) 277-9766
Fax (303) 277-1655
4903-9146 Atv 24VDC rsCD RED I HZ(SPKR)
2099-9103 PSBREAKGLASS,I N/O
2098-9649 DUCT HOUSING ONLY 2 OR 4 WIRE
2098-9201 DET / PHOTO LOW PROFILE 2.6%
2098-9811 BAFFLE FOR 2098.920I
2098-9797 SAMPLING TUBE 49"
2098-9805 REMOTE TEST STATION RED LED KEY SW
2098-9211 DETECTOR BASE 2.WIRE
4098-9408 HEAT DETECTOR t35 ROR FOR BASE
OPERATIONS MANAGER:
ENGINEERING SUPPORT:
SALES SUPPORT:
CELIA MOORHEAD
CRAIG BRYAN
JIM CRAFT
Arc+thectural
Co:'poi'ate Headqi.;ai.ee Srrrptslplua GarCner, MA 01441-0001 U.S.A. (503)632-25C0
Aa 2'-'} -e1
O SSimplo(149!rgWest 6th Avenue
Frontage Road, Suite 1600
Goldeo CO 8ry|o1
Sales (303) 27-9733
SeMce €03)22-9766
Fax (303) 27-1655
Simplex
Technical Installer Support
(T|s)
TIS ls deslghed to make the expertlse of a Slmplex technlclan avallable at key scheduled tlmes
dudng fhe prolect. Thls servlce ls araltable durlng normal SlmPtex worklnE hours lf scheduled
llvo worklng days ln adrance.
TIS tncludes tfte tottowln! actlvltles by a factoly tralned technlclan wten delerrnlned by Slmplex
to be approprl.te.
:+ P?econstructlon nevlew of submlttals and drawlnSs wlth the Installer'
+ Tectrnlcal advlce durln! Inlttal start up of control panels (tncludlng transponder)
. before lnstaller wlrln$ ls connecfed.
+ Revlew of panet wlrtng and preparatlon of a tlst of ltems to be coFecfed by the
lnstaller.
+ Prollram edttlng to correct mlnor ertors and onasslons.
+ Asslstance wlth one complete tunctlonal test of the system.
+ One tralnlng sesslon lor the owneds representatlves.
Addltlonat Instaltatlon suppolt may be purchased from Slmplex.
TtS enhances expertlse ln Slmplex Installatlons but does not supplant the lnstaller's
commltment to:
1. Provlde skltted labor and supelvlslon to Gomplete the prolect'
2. Revlew and understand Slmplex tnstructlons tor Installlng and testln!|, Slmplex
. equlpment.
Potentlal probtems can be avolded by adherln$ to the followlng:
r Do not Inltlalty start up the system exoept ln the presence of a Slmplex technlclan.
Slmplex assumes no llablllty for damaged equlpment and waranty may be volded lf
thls procedure ls not followed.
. Ito not Inst lt smoke detectons (unless protected by plastlc batls) untll nnal
constructlon clean up has occurred. Thls ls to prevenl damage caused by dust' dlrt
and palnt. Detcciors lnstalted prlor to clean up may requlre dlsassemble' Gleanlng or
replacement whlch ls not covered by warranty.
o Care must be taken to protect equlpment durlng the lnstallatlon and warranty perlod'
Fallures due to external causes (llgntlngl su4!es, Gonstructlon dust, waler damatle'
etc.) wttl be repalred by Slmplex only upon recelpt of a valld wrltten Putchase Order'
. TIS Includes one complete system lest whlch ls coordlnated by the lnstaller. To avold
addltlonat charges, Instalter shoutd schedute thls test so that alt approprlate pariles
. are pnesent.
Corpo:'a:: Heachuaners Simplex Plaza Gardner, MA 01441-0001 U.S A. (5081 632-2500
A/, 01c,i r. :
O Ssimpls(14998West 5th Avenue
Frontage Road, Suite t1600
Golden, CO 8eD1
Sales (303) 27l-9733
SeMce €03) 22-9765
Fax (303) 2Z-1555
RESPONSIBILITIES
Simplex, as your equipment supplier, vli!! supply the following during Simplex's regular taorking
norE tg'".m. to S p.m. Monday'through Friday, except for Simplex observed holidays):
complete submittals and drawings to provide equipment specifications and wiring
information necessary to meet the project's systems operational specification.
Technical installation support (T.l.S.) to include having a Simplex technician available at
key scheduled times to provide technical advice.
A one-time testing of the completed system unless additional tests are listed in the Bill of
Material.
One end-user training session unless additional training is listed in the Bill of Material-
PROCEDURE CLARI FICATIONS
Five r,rorking days joFsite visitation notification is required'
Alt conduit, wire, wiring, termination and repair of wiring are not included.
. A fire alarm service agreement is optional, but not included unless listed in the Bill of
Material.
. As-built drawings are not included unless listed in the Bill of Material.
WARRANry
Simplex is providing a 12 month equipment uarranty to start when the final test is completed' or
when the iystem is utilized to pioiect any portion of the building, whichever comes first'
Warranty providecl during Simplex's regular uorking hours
(g a.m. to'5 p.m. Monday through Fridiy, except for Simplex observed holidays).
Simplex r/telcomes the opportunity to quote additional technical labor pncducts (T'L'P') to assist
when requested to help increase'your project productivity and profit. Example: panel and/or
peripheral termination, etc.
NO rEi All of the above clauses pertain only to the equipment interconnected to the
. Simplex system that v\as purchased from Simplex Time Recorcler Co'
RETURNED MERCHANDISE POLICY
A "Retumed Merchandise Authorization Fom' must be obhined through our office prior
to any return of equir,,7|en1- when fitling out this form, please i!9!ld3 the quanfia of
equipment being retumed and the invoici number on which it '''as
billed.
Att matefiat retumed musl be shipped in 'new" condifott, or in the -original shipping.
con1inef wiU treignt pi*paia. M'aieriat that is rctumed musl ln withln a 90 day period
from the invoice a"t". i ij|qf,;king fee of 25o/o wilt be tevied for inspection and return to
s,((x:k. Att claimsf(,- t*t'iJi"i.d in ffinsit items must be made, as provided by law'
to fie tansporhtion compny by the purchas*'
corporate Hed,lquade6 S,r'npiex Plaza Gardner MA 01-:lllr]001 u.S-A- 1508)632-2500
'd/ O2g't Fien
S.Simplex M u lti-Appl ica?on Peri pherals
and Accessories
UL Listed
FM Approved
Visible and AudibleA/isible Appliances
4903 Series AudibleA/isible
N.Y.C. MEAApproved*Notification Appliances with 1Hz Strobes
FEATURES:
.24VDC Powered Xenon Flashtube Visible
Notif ication Appliance :
- UL Listed to Standard 1971
- 15, 30, or 110 Candela Models Available
- Under Normal Operating Conditions, all Strobe
Light Models Rated at 15 Candela and 30
Candela per UL 1971 Have Been Tested for 75
Candela On-Axis
- Compatible with ADA Requirements
- Exclusive Reflector Design Provides Light
Output in Key Axis Directions Allowing Vertical
or Horizontal Mounting
- Wiring Terminals are Separate from Audible
Notif ication Appliance
- Polycarbonate Lens
- Regulated Circuit Design Protects Flash
Capacitor and Ensures Consistent Output
. Synchronized Flash Rate Models Available
for use with Synchronizing Module 4905-
9914 (Style Y), or 4905-9922 (Style Z)
. UL Standard 464 Listed Horn Models:
- 24 VDC Electro-Mechanical Design with
Electronic Control (No Moving Contacts)
- Diode Polarized for Connection to Reverse
Polarity, Supervised NAC
. UL Standard 1480 Listed Speaker Models:
- Available for 25 VRMS or 70 VRMS Input
- Capacitor Input for Connection to Reverse
Polarity, Supervised NAC
. Rectangular Housing with Horn or Speaker:
- Red with White "FlRE" Lettering
- Off-White with Red 'FIRE" Lettering
SPECIF]CATIONS:
Rectangular (w/lens) .......4 3/4" H x 6 7/8" W x 2 5/8" D
speaker Depth into r", .11 :l ::.:. ].itilt,I,3lilill
Horn Depth into Box............................ t 1/8" (29mm)
Connections ........................ Terminals for I niOut Wiring
#18 to #14AWG
Operating Temperature......32'F to 120'F (0'C to 49'C)
Operating Humidity 10 - 95% Non-Condensing
at 86'F (30'C)
Operating Voltage .............18 to 32VDC
. Accepted for use - City ot New York Department of Buildings - MEA35-99-E.
@ I 996 Simpl€x ]ime R€cordor Co.
4903 SERIES AUDIBLEA/ISIBLE NOTIFICATTON
APPLIANCES
Horn Current ...............38mA @ 24VDC
Typical Horn Output ................. 87dBA Nominal @ 1 OFt
Visible Appliance:
Flash Rate....... ....... 1 Hz
Nominal Cunent at 24Y DC.,
1 5 Candela (Effective Intensity)........................ 85mA
30 Candela (Eff ective Intensity)...................... 1 00mA
1 1 0 Candela (Effective Intensity)...................... 200mA
Publication S4903-0006-7 2-96
SPECTFTCAilONS (CONTINU
Speaker Specifications :
Frequency Response:
For Fire Alarm 400H2 to 4kHz
For General Signaling 125Hzto 12kHz
1/2W, 1W 2W
Typical Sound Levels':
Rectangular Housing Mode|s............. 1/4W = 79dBA
(at 1oft with l kHz input using 1/2W = 82dBA
conventional meters) 1W = 85dBA
2W = 88dBA
' Minimum sound levels, as determined by integrated sound pressure
measurements per UL Standards 464 and 1480, are 4 dBA lower.
DESCRIPTION:
Simplex 4903 series audible/visible notification
appliances are available in three visible intensity levels,
with speakers or horns, in red or off-white rectangular
housings. This allows the required notilication to be
accurately selected for the intended area. These
appliances may be either horizontally or vertically wall
mounted, because an exclusive (patent pending) multi-
surface reflector is used to provide symmetrical light
output in key axis directions. The lens assembly fits
securely into its housing, providing a high integrity
notif ication appliance that is impact and vandal resistant
and suitable for a variety of applications.
When multiple visible appliances and their reflections
can be seen from one location, synchronized flashes
reduce the probability of photo-sensitive reactions.
Flash synchronization module 4905-9914 or 4905-9922
will control the observed flashes of synchronized flash
models at a rate of 1Hz using the existing two wire
visible appliance circuit (patent pending). Standard
models will operate in a free-running mode even when
connected to a synchronized NAC.
The efficient switching regulator electronic design
provides over-voltage protection for the flash discharge
capacitor and ensures consistent visible notification
outout.
Proper selection of visible notification is dependent on
occupancy, location, local codes, and proper
applications ol:lhe National Fire Alarm Code (1993
NFPA72), ANSI A117.1, the appropriate model building
code, BOCA, ICBO, or SBCCI, and the application
guidelines of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Consult your local Simplex representative for
assislance in determining these requirements.
4903 AUDIBLEN'|SIBLE SELECTION CHART FOR APPLIANCES WITH HORNS
PRODUCT
IDENTIFICATION
VISIBLE NOTIFICATION
APPLIANCE OUTPUT
(Candela)
HOUSING
STYLE
MOUNTING
STYLE
AUDIBLE
APPLIANCE
1 Hz Standard 1 Hz Synchronized 15 30 110
4903-9219 4903-9401 X
Red
Rectangular
Horizontal
Wall Mount
HORN
24 VDC
4903-9215 4903-9403 X
4903-9217 4903-9405 X
4903-922'l X Off-White
Rectangular4903-9222 X
4903-9219H X Red
Rectangular
Horizontal Wall
Mount for High
Humidity Areas-
4903-9220 X Red
Rectangular
Vertical Wdl
Mount(Retrofit)4903-9218 X
. Suffix H modols are intended lor indoor use in areas where humidity is normally high, such as swimming pool rooms, lockgr rooms. stc., and
require the 4905-9907 gasket kit. NOTE: Audible output ls attonuated by 3dBA.
4903 AUDIBLEA/ISIBLE ACCESSORIES
Red Adapter Plate, Mounts Vertical Housings on 2975-9145 Boxes, 5 3/4" x 8 5/1 6" ('l46mm x 211mm)
Red Wire Guard, I7l8" x 9 3/16" x5114" Deep (225mm x 233mm x 133mm)
High Humidity Gasket Kit
Zinc Plated Adapter for Surface Mount Rectangular Housings, 4 7/8" x 7" ('l24mm x 1 78mm)
Synchronized Flash Module. Style Y operation. Epoxy Encapsulated with In/Out AWG #18 Wirs Leads, rated for 2A NAC,
requires lomAfor power. 1 3/8"W x 2 7/16" Lx 13/16" H (35mm x 62mm x 20mm)
Ofi-White Adapter Fling Box Extension,4 314" x67l8" x'l 112" Deep, (121mm x 'l75mm x 38mm)
Red Adapter Ring Box Extension, 4 3/4" x 6 7/8" x 1 I/2" Deep, (121mm x 175mm x 38mm)
Synchronized Flash Module. Stvle Z operation. Epoxy Encapsulated with In/Out AWG #18 Wire Leads, rated for 24 NAC,
requires 1 omA for power. 1 3/8" W x 2 7/1 6" L x 13/1 6" H (35mm x 62mm x 20mm)
Red Surface Mount Box,4 5/16" x6518" x2314" (11omm x 168mm x 70mm)
Off-White Surface Mount Box, 4 5/16'x 6 5/8" x 2 3/4" (l lomm x 168mm x 70mm)
Red Box for Vertical Mount Housing, 51/8" x7 718" x23l4" Deep (130mm x 200mm x 70mm
Suftix H models are intended lor indoor use in areas where humidity is normally high, such as swimming pool rooms, locker rooms. etc., and
require the 4905-9907 gasket kit. NOTE: Audible output is atlenuated by 3dBA.
MOUNTING INFORMATION:
4903 AUDIBLE,T,= sELEcTIoN cHART FoR APPLn]TS wITH sPEAKERS
FOB A'lV WITH HOFN:
4" SQ. 1 1/2" DEEP BOX (RACO # 191 OR EOUAL)
BY OTHERS
FOR A'lV WITH SPEAKER:
4"SO. 1 i/2"DEEP BOX (RACO # 191 OR EOUAL)
wlTH 1 1/2" EXTENSTON (RACO # 203 OR EQUAL)
BY OTHERS
3 GANG BOX. 2 314" DEEP
(wtREMOLD NO. 5744-3
OR EOUAL), BY OTHERS
4905-9908
ADAPTER PLATE
NOTE
BOX ORIENTATION
PRODUCT
IDENTIFlCATION
VISIBLE NOTIFICATION
APPLIANCE OUTPUT
(Candela)HOUSlNG
STYLE
MOUNTING
STYLE
AUDIBLE
APPLIANCE/
VOLTAGE1 Hz Standard 1 Hz Synchronized 15 30 110
4903-9146 4903-9301 X
Red
Rectangular
Horizontal
Wall Mount
SPEAKER
25 VRMS
4903-9142 4903-9303 X
4903-9144 X
4903-9167 X
Ofi-White
Flectangular4903-9170 X
4903-9173 X
4903-9146H X Red
Rectangular
Horizontal Wall
Mount for High
Humidity Areas-
4903-9147 X Red
Rectangular
Vertical Wall
Mount (Retrofit)
4903-9168 4903-9326 X
Red
Rectangular
Horizontal
Wall Mount
SPEAKER
70 VRMS4903-9171 4903-9329 X
4903-9174 4903-9332 X
SEMI-FLUSH
WALL MOUNT
4905-9923 0R
490+9924
SURFACE MOUNT BOX
RECTANGULAR HOUSING
SURFACE MOUNT
NOTE
BOX ORIENTATION
MOUNTING INFORMATION (ED):
o
CONTINU
WEATHERPROOF 3 GANG
BOX, 2 5/8" DEEP (RACO
NO. 539G0 OR EOUAL}
BYOTHERS
tilGH HUilTDTTY APPLtCATtONS,
SURFACE OR SEL|-FLUSH)
4905-9907 H|GH HUM|D|TY
GASKET KIT (REQUIRED FOR
4s BOX
4905.9903 ADAPTER PLATE
2975-9145 BOX
490S9903 ADAPTER PLATE
VERTICAL MOUNT
(RETROFtT)
490$9908
ADAPTER PLATE
SURFACE MOUNT
HIGH HUMIDITY APPLICATION
HORIZONTAL MOUNT
(RETROFTT)
EXISTING &INCH
SOUARE
OUTLET BOX
IN WALL
(NOTE BOX
ORIENTATION)
RETROFIT MOUNTING
REQUIRING BOXr( EXTENSION
4905-9915
OR
4905-9916
ADAPTER RING
i:'
't::. '
':i:..ii.-...
Gardner, Massachusens 01441-0001 U.S.A.
Offices and Representatives Throughout the World
All specilications and other intormation shown wers currenl as ot publicalion, and are subjecl to chang€ without notlce. Prinled in u.S.A.
S.Simplex
S.Simplex Mu lti-Appl ication Peri pherals
and Accessories
UL Listed
FM Approved
Non-Coded Manual Stations
2099-Series
FEATURES:
. Single Action Models
. Double Action Models
- Breakglass
- Push Type
. Pull Lever Protrudes when Alarmed
. Tamper Resistant Reset Key Lock,
(Keyed Same as Fire Alarm Cabinet). InstitutionalVersion (Key Operated Only). Pre-Signal and Annunciator Contact Options. LocalAlarm Cover Option. Surface, Flush, or Semi-Flush Mounting
. Complies with ADA Requirements
OPERATION:
Single Action Stations require a firm downward pull to
activate the alarm switch. Motion resistance is provided
by breaking an internal plastic break-rod (visible below
the pull lever). The pull lever latches into the alarm
position and remains extended out of the housing to
provide a visible indication of which station was
alarmed.
Double Action Stations (Breakglass) require the
operator to strike the front mounted hammer to break
the glass and expose the recessed pull lever. The pull
lever then operates as a single action station.
Double Action Stations (PushType) require that a spring
loaded interference plate (marked PUSH) be pushed
back to access the pull lever of the single action station.
lnstitutional Stations are designed to activate by key
operation only. This allows access for manual alarms to
be limited to authorized personnel. Operation requires
key insertion and opening ot the station housing.
Ere-Signaloption activates when the lever is pulled.
General alarm initiation requires a key to activate a
keyswitch located behind the pull lever.
Station Reset requires use of the housing key to reset
the pull station lever and deactivates the alarm switch. lf
the break-rod is used, it must be replaced. Breakglass
stations require glass replacement.
Iesfing requires physical activation of the pull lever
(except for institutional stations).
@ 1 996 SimDlox nlne Recorder Co.
DOUBLE ACTION STATION
(BREAKGLASS)
SINGLE ACTION STATION
WINSTITUTIONAL COVER
SINGLE ACTION STATION
DOUBLE ACTION STATION
NON-BREAKGLASS
(PUSHTYPE)
Publication 52099-0007-1 2 6-96
CONSTRUCTION:
Station housings and pull levers are construcled of
chip resistant and dirt resistant, high impact Lexan.*
Housings are red with white letlering and pull levers
are white with red lettering.
APPLIGATIONS:
Refer to NFPA 72, the National Fire Alarm Code,
(reference section 5-9) and all applicable local codes
for complete requirements for manual stations. The
following summarizes the basic requirements.
' Lexan 16 a rogistered trad€mark of the General Electric Co.
Stations shall be t"O in the normat path of exit
and distributed in the protected area such that they
are unobstructed and readily accessible.
Mounting shall be with the operable part not less than
31/2ft('l .1 m) and not more than 4 1/2tt (1.37 m) above
floor level.
At least one station shall be provided on each floor.
Additional stations shall be provided to obtain a travel
distance not more than 200 ft (61 m) to the nearest
station from any point in the building.
When manual station coverage appears limited in
any way, additional stations should be installed.
SPECIFICATION TABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Temperature Range .....32'F to 140'F
(0"C to 60.C)
Humidity Range.......... up to 90% RH
at 90"F (32"C)
MOUNTING BOX NOTES:
1. These models can be semi-flush
mounted using a standard single
gang switch box,3"x 2"x2-1/2".
Mount box flush or 1/1 6" protruding
(DO NOT RECESS). These
models can also be surface
mounted on a Wiremold box no.
57445, (4-518" H x 2-718" W
x2-1/4" D).
2. For MAPNET ll addressable pull
stations, semi-f lush mounting
requires 2, ganged switch boxes,3"
x 2" x 2-314" each, or a receptacle
box 4-314" x 4-3/4" x2-114"
(Wiremold no.57445-2 with 2099-
9814 trim). For additional
information, refer to installatibn
instruction PER-21 -504 (575-1 55).
3, 2975-9022 cast aluminum boxes
are for use with non-addressable
stations. Reler to note 2 for
addressable station mounting.
2otr
?
ulJ(,
=o
z
Egul('
AE
Eo3o,
IF
?
utJo
=oo
q
2
j
2g
o
IIJEo.
qzfG
J
E
UJz
llJo
-Q
9z-<lh
3Ezzzo<o
cQ
9z-<ltot)
=f,zzzo<o
Gtrt
o
=G
J
4=xo
qE:-o
E
uJ
o
J
zoF)zF9::F9! O-
=o
r,llJo
o
ahulEoo
=oh=z=t3
= irt
afr-trozz
EHPRODUCT t.O.
209$,975{x X 1
20999101 x X X
209+'9102 x X X
2099.9107 X X X X
209&.9755 X x X
2{t9&979s X X 2
a)99-9797 X X X
2099-9762 X X X
zlg991(ts x X
20999104 X X X
20999105 x X X
209&9108 x X X X
209S9796 x X 2
2{t9S9756 X X
z)9$97s7 X X X
21999758 X X X
20999759 X X X X
209e9761 X X 2
209S-9828 Institulional Cover Kir
2000-9803 Replacement Breakglass (English)
.2099-9822 Roplac€ment Retaining Cltp for Breakglass
2099.9804 ReDlac€ment Breakrod
209$9819 Flush Adaptor Kit (Black)
at9$9820 Flush Adaptor Kit (Beige
2st7$.90.22 Cast Aluminum Surlace Mount Box (Red) NOTE 3
4)7*9178 Steel Surfac€ Mount Box (Red)
20s99813 Semi-Flush (Fed) for Two Gang Switch Box (MAPNET ll)
209$9814 Surfac€ Trim (Redl for Wiremold Receptacle Box (MAPNET ll)
ROO\
5".t
(127mm)
KNOCKOUTS FOR 3/4 INCH
THREADED (1.gcn) CONDUTT
TOP AND BOTTOM OF BOX
FURNISHED BY SII'PLEX
SEMI-FLUSH MOUNTING
1t16"
(1.6mm)
WALL
SURFACE
MOUNTING INFORMATION
KNOCKOUTS FOR 3/4 INCH
(1.gcm) CONDUIT TOP
AND BOTTOM OF BOX
FURNISHED BY SIMPLEX2-3t16"
(56mm)
1-5/t6"
(33mm)
SURFACE MOUNTING:
Reler to Installation Instructions
PER-21 -502 (574-656) for
additional information.
2975-9022
BOX
I
I
5"
(l27mm)
2-3t16"
(56mm)
STANDARD SINGLE GANG
SWITCH COVER NOT
FURNISHED BY SIiIPLEX
RACO NO. 773,
APPLETON NO. 8468, OR
STEEL C|TY NO. 52C-14
(102mm)
2-118" (5.39cm) DEPTH
STANDABO OUTLET BOX
NOT FURNISHED BY SIIIPLEX
RACO NO. 231 0R 232,
APPLETON NO. 4SD.3/4 OR 4SD.SPL. OR
STEEL C|TY NO. 52171-3/4 0R
52171-1t2 & 3t4.
N
NOTE: DO NOT USE SHALLOW BACKBOX.
NOTE: BOX MUST B
MOUNTING INFORIIATION
6-3/4"
(171mm)
4-11/16" (119mm) SOUARE BOx
2-118" (s4mm) OEEP (NOT FURNISHED BY SIXPLEX)
WALL SURFACE
FLUSH ADAPTOF
MANUAL
STATION
1-1/8" (29mm)
RECESS
RECESSED
INTO WALL
1" (25mm)
TO 1-1/8" (29mm).
REFEF TO INSTALLATION
tNsrBUcTloN. PER-21 -503 (574-6s8)
FOB AOOITIONAL INFORiIATION.
@o
8"
Gardner, Massachusetts 01441{001 U.S.A.
Offices and Represer ativBs Throughout the Wodd
All specifications and olher inlormalion shown uroro curont as ol Frblicatlon. and aae $rqod !o darlls wittool notice. Pridad ln U.S.A.
S.Simpler(
SSimplex Multi-Application Peripherals
and Accessories
UL, ULC Listed.
FM Approved**
Duct Detectors
2098-9649
Duct Smoke Detector Housing
FEATURES:
. Duct Smoke Detector Housinq for use with
2098-9201 (photoetectic) or 2198-9576
(lonization) Smoke Detectors
. Two-Wire or Four-Wire Operation
. 24VDC or 120VAC Operation
. Visible Alarm LED Output
. Remote LED Outout
. Auxiliary Control Contacts
. Pre-Aligne^d, Multi-Length Sampting Tubes
(Ordered Separately)
. Sampling Tubes are Installed with Housing in
Place
. Ootions
- 2098-9806, Remote Test Station (Kev
Switch/LED Alarm Indicator)
- 2098-9805, Remote Test St'ation and
Power On lndicator
- 2098-9808, Remote LED Atarm Indicator
SPECIFICATIONS:
UL Listing Standard......... ......... UL26BA
Air Velocily Ran9e............... .............400 to 4000 lVmin
(122 to 1220mlminl
2-Wire Operation:
Voltage ......15-32VDC
Slandby Current .......................40uA
Alarm Current. ..50mA
4-Wire Ooeralion:
Voltage ......18-32VDC
Standby Current .....24mA, add 20mA
for remote Power-on LED
- A|armCurrent................................50mA,add2.9mA
for remote alarm LED
AC Powered 102-132VAC,60Hz,3VA,
using 2098-9747 Power Adapler
Control Relay Contacts ......... ................. 2Aat 1 20VAC.
or 2BVDC, Resistive
UL Listed Temperature Range ................ 32,'F to 1 20.F
(0'C to 3B"C)
Operating Temperature Range................ 32.F to 1 20"F
(0"C to a9'C)
Humidity Range............ .10 to 90%, RH
Dimensions ................... Refer to page 4
Color ..,........... ........Grav
,., 1995 Simple)( Tjme Recorder Co.
DUCT DETECTOR HOUSING 2098-9649
(sHowN wtTH SAMPL|NG TUBES)
INTRODUCTION:
Simplex 2098-9649 duct smoke detector housings
detect the presence of smoke in air conditioning or
ventilating ducts. Sampling tubes are installed into the
duct and air is directed to a smoke detector mounted in
the housing. The 2098-9649 duct housing with smoke
detector is compatible with Simplex lire alarm control
panels that provide two-wire or four-wire initiating
device circuits.
The 2098-9649 duct detector housing requires the
addition o1 a 2098-9201 photoelectric smoke detector or
a 2098-9576 ionization smoke detector, a matchino
detector baffle. and a correct length sampling tube (see
selection charts on page 3). Each of these items is
separately ordered for proper compatibilty with the
specific application.
Optional AC power module 2098-9747 is available for
applications where the detector relay lunctions are
supplementary only.
NOTE: Smoke detection in air ducts is intended
to notify of the presence of smoke in the duct.It is not intended to, and will not, replace
smoke detection requirements for open areas
or other non-duct applications.
' ULC Lisled modes aic 2098 9649C and 2098-9805C
" Wrlh 2098 9201 photoetectric detector ont,
Publication 52098.0040- 1 2 7-95
APPLIGATIONS:
Prelerred Duct Detector Locations:
1. A minimum of six duct widths downstream from
bends or inlets to avoid air turbulence.
2. On the downstream side ot lilters to detect fires in the
f ilters.
3. In return ducts, ahead of mixing areas.
4. Upstream of air humidifier and cooling coils.
5. With accessibility for test and service.
6. For additional information, refer to NFPA 90A,
Standard for the Installation of Air Conditioning and
Ventilating Systems.
- EXHAUSTI DAXPEF
OETECTOf,
(o.K.)
Locations to Avoid:
1. Where dampers closed for comfort would interfere
with airflow.
2. Next to outside air inlets (unless the intent is to
monitor smoke entry from that area).
3. In return air damper branch ducts and mixing areas
where airflow may be restricted.
2098-9805
REMOTE
TEST STATION AND
POWER ON INDICATOR
EXHAUST <-RETURN<- AIR
RETURNAIR
OAIPER
FRE9II
AIF
INTAKE ---*if'
OO I{OT LOCATE
DETECTOB HERE
D€TECTOR
(o.K.)
FITTER
BAIIX
DUCT DETECTOR LOCATION REFERENCE DIAGRAMS
REMOTE INDICATOR OPT]ONS:
Mounting requires standard single gang boxes, 2"W x 3"H with a minimum depth of 2" (51mm W x 76mm H x 51mm D),
supplied by others.
2098-9808
REMOTE
ALARM
INDICATOR
2098-9806
REMOTE
TEST
STATION
.'Dll \JU-_/ ,t;r"rfr,or""*i
2098-9549 DUCT DETECTOR HOUSING APPLICATIONS
WIRING CONFIGURATION NOTES ACCESSORTES
Two-Wire DC Ooeration
1. Green Power-On LED is ofl in
Two-Wire ooeration.
2. Connect only one Duct
Detector to a Two-Wire circuit
if the alarm relay is being used
for control functions.
3. Reler to wiring diagrams sup-
plied with the control panel for
proper End-of-Line resistor
vatue.
2098-9806, Alarm Indicator
with Key Test Switch
2098-9808, Remote Alarm
lndicator
Four-Wire Operation
Four-Wire AC Ooeration
w/2098-9747
Power Adapler
(see note 2)
1.Removing the detector from
the housing or failure of 24
VDC supply power will de-
energize the Kl relay and
transfer relay trouble contacts
to open the initiating circuit.
Refer to wiring diagrams sup-
plied with the control panel for
proper End-of-Line resistor
value.
z-
1.Removing the detector from
the housing or failure of
120VAC supply will de-ener-
gize the Kl relay and transler
relay trouble contacts lo open
the initiating circuit.
Refer to wiring diagrams sup-
plied with the control panel for
proper End-of-Line resistor
value.
2098-9806, Alarm Indicator
with Key Test Switch
2098-9808. Remote Alarm
Indicator
2098-9806. Alarm Indicator
with Key Test Switch
2098-9808, RemoteAlarm
Indicator
2098-9805, Alarm and
Power Indicator with Key
Test Switch
OVERALL DUCT WIDTH TUBE REOUIRED SUGGESTED LENGTH
1 ft. (0.3m)2098-9796 1 in. (2.54cm) Less than Duct Width
13 in. (33cm) to 2 ft. (0.6m)
2 ft. (0.6m) to 46 in. (1 .16m)
46 in. (1.16m) to 71 in. (1.8m)
71 in. (1.8m) to 95 in. (2.4m)
2098-9804
2098-9797
2098-9
2098-9
/YU
799
1 in. (2.54cm) Less than Duct Width
1/2 in. (1.3cm) Longer than Duct Width
1t2in. (1j..) Lg"g"rtM. DuctWidth
1/2 in. (1.3cm) Longer than D,r.t \n/idth
3
NOTES:
1. Duct detectors must be connected on separate circuits for identilication purposes.
2. When the 2098-9747 Power Adapter is used, the only function that can be performed trom the detector is
supplementary.
3. Each duct detector installation requires a separately ordered smoke detector, sampling tube, and smoke detector
baffle. Detector 2098-9201 requires baffle 2098-9811. Detector 2098-9576 requires baffle 2098-9817.
4. Photoelectric smoke detection is recommended lor air duct applications. Prior to specilying ionization detection,
consult Simplex for application guidance.
SAMPLING TUBE SELECTION CHART
TYP!CAL SPECIFICATION (PHOTOELECTRIC):
Furnish and install where indicated on the plans.
Simplex type 2098-9649 duct housings with 2098-9201
Photoelectric smoke detector. The detector shall be UL
Listed for compatibilty with the fire alarm control panel
and shall obtain its operating power from the alarm
initiating circuit.
Detectors shall operate on the light-scattering, photo-
diode principle. To minimize nuisance alarms, detectors
shall have an insect screen and be designed to ignore
invisible airborne particles or smoke densities that are
below the factory-set alarm point. No radioactive
materials shall be used.
Removal of the detector head shall interruot the
supervisory circuit and activate a trouble signal at the
control panel. lt shall be possible to alarm the duct
detector by using Simplex 2098-9805 or 2098-9806
remote stations.
Auxiliary SPDT relays and/or remote LED alarm
indicators and key-operated test stations shall be
installed where indicated.
DIMENSIONS:
TYPTCAL SpECtF|CAT|ON (tONtZATtON):
Furnish and install where indicated on the olans.
Simplex type 2098-9649 duct housings with 2098-9576
dual-chamber, ionizalion smoke detectors. The detector
shall be UL Listed for compatibility with the lire alarm
control panel and shall obtain its operating power from
the alarm initiating circuit.
Removal of the detector head shall inlerruot the
supervisory circuit and activat a trouble signal at the
control panel. lt shall be possible to alarm the duct
detector by using Simplex 2098-9805 or 2098-9806
remote stations.
Auxiliary SPDT relays andior remote LED alarm
indicators and key-operated test stations shall be
installed where indicated.
INSTALLATION NOTES:
1. Sampling tubes and exhausl lubes are keyed for
proper alignment with the duct housing. Templates
are supplied with the unit and must be properly
aligned with respect to air flow.
2. For installation details, refer to installation
instructions PER-21-010 supplied with the unit.
3. For field wiring diagrams, refer to document 841-697.
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
f he National Fire Alarm Code, NFPA 72-1 993, Chapter
7, Table 7-2.2,Tesl Methods, states "Air duct deteciors
shall be tested or inspected to ensure that the device
will sample the air stream. The test shall be made in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions."
The following is a partial maintenance list to follow for
duct detector locations :
1. Periodically check duct detector locations to ensure
proper air flow and to verify integrity to the standards
of the installation instructions.
2. Sensor air entry areas should be vacuumed on a six
month basis or as required.
3. Additional considerations are contained in
Installation Instructions PER-21 -010.
10 1/2" --
lrzozmmr Il,
'li ... .:; .,,,::.:
cardner, Massachusetts 01441-OOO1 U.S.A.
Oflices and Fiepresentatives Throughout the World
Al 5peL,lL.dl.rns 3n.j olher Inlormalon shown were currenl as ol publ|cat,on. and are subiect to change wilhoul nolice. prnrted In U S A
flSimplex
o
Mu lti-Appl ication Peri pherals
and AccessoriesIiSimplex
UL Listed to Standard 268 Photoelectric
Smoke Detector
2098 Series
ULC Listed.
FM Approved
FEATURES:
. Low Profile
. Two or Four Wire Operation
. Ceiling or Sidewall Mounting
. Locking Tamper Screw. Pulsing Power-On Indicator (LED)
. LED Alarm Indicator
. Magnetically Operated Functional Test
. Totally Shielded Electronics
. Optional 120 VAC Operation
. Optional 135'F Heat Element (Fixed)
. Optional Relay Module
. Optional Remote Alarm LED
SPECIFICATIONS:
Voltage Range ............15 to 32VDC (24 VDC Nominal)
Standby Currenl........... ... (2-Wire) 45ua
Alarm Current. (2-Wire) 47mA
Standby Current........... ... (4-Wire) 45ua
UL Listed Air Velocity .......... 0-1000 fpm
Alarm Current. (4-Wire) 70mA
UL Listed Temperature Range ............ .....32'F to 100"F
(0'C to 38"C)
Operating Temperature Range............. .... 1 4' F to 1 22" F
(-10"C to +50"C)
Humidity Range ............ 10% to 90% RH
Co|or.............. OftWhite
APPLICATION:
These smoke detectors can be mounted on a ceiling or
wall. For ceiling location, detectors should be mounted
as close as possible to the center of a hallway or room.
lf this is not possible, the edge of the detector should be
at least 4 inches from any wall. For wall location, locate
the top of the detector at least 4 inches and not more
than 12 inches from the ceiling.
Detector locations should be determined only after
careful consideration is made of the physical layout and
contents ol the area to be protected. Refer to NFPA 72-
1993, the National Fire Alarm Code. On smooth
ceilings, spacing of 30 ft. (9.1m) may be used as a
guroe.
For detailed installation information. reference Simolex
publication PER-21 -007 (#575-285). Smoke detector
field wiring can be found on Simplex W.D. 841 687.
r.) 1995 Srmpler Time Recofdef Co.
2098-9201 DETECTOR
WITH
2098-9211 BASE
2098-9202 DETECTOR
WITH
2098-9536 BASE
ENGINEER GUIDE SPECIFICATION:
Provide Simplex type 2098-9201 photoelectric smoke
detectors mounted in a type 2098-9211 two-wire (2098-
9536 four-wire) base. The detectors shall be listed to UL
standard 268 and shall be documenled comoatible with
the control equipment to which they are connected. The
detectors shall each contain a locking screw to
discourage unauthorized removal ol the head from the
oase.
The detectors shall have 3O-mesh insect screens, and
have completely closed backs to minimize entry of dust
and air turbulence. Electronics of the units shall be
completely shielded to protect against false alarms from
EMI and RFl. The detector head shall be easily
disassembled to lacilitate cleaning.
The detectors shall contain a red LED which shall oulse
to indicate power on and glow continuously to indicate
alarm. The detector shall contain a functional test switch
(Magnetically operated) which, when operated, shall
test the electronics of the unit and simulate an alarm
condition.
The 2098-9202 detector shall be orovided with a 135'F
(Fixed) heat element on the detector.
Publication S2098-0048-9 3-95
DETECTOR ACCESSORIES:
OPTIOiIAL l2OVAC POWER
ADAPTER, A)9&9734'
DIMENSIONS:
ROI'TE ALL
WIBES
THIS
-rG'\€84
il[l||r
,[illlll
RELAY MOOULES:
200&9737. USE WITH at9S95:t6. a wlRE BASES
2, OPDT CO}{fACTS RATEO 3A @ 94VDC OR imVAC
ar9&9627, USE W|TH 2(t9S921t, 2 W|RE BASES
2, OPDT CONTACIS RATEO 1A @ 3|,VDC, 0.5A @ 12OV C
APPROX. SIZE: 2 1i2"L x 1 1,2"W t 1"H
(63.5lnm x 38.2mm x 25.4lnm)
209&0739
E.O.L. NETAY'
(REOUIRED FOR +WIRE OETEC'ION LOOP)
APPBOX. SIZE 212"L r 1 112'V x 1"H
(63.5mn x 38.2mft r 25-4mm)
TEST TOOLS (DEV|CES rOT SHOWN):
2098-9814, TESTTOOL
ATTACH ENT HEAD WITH IIAG]{ETS
ar9&9415. TEST TOOL
HOLDER FOR 209&9814
STATDARD ELECTRICAI.\ BOX a4rilr2-14")-I M)T SUPPUED'. I AY S|IPLEX
ato&gru REourREo
w2@&9734
20*97it4
FOWEB PACK*
BASE
m98-95:t6-'
W
2t!9&99)8 REmOTE ALARft
It{otcAToR
6112"
\
2G)&9m1
I r tf
-
-f--f zizs-
LocKtNG l.:J (5 o3c'n)
,*Jf#T.^-"'4={---l
2lt9&9536-----
BASE Ax)&9211
LOCKIXGscREw-
2098-9202 HEAO
{
arg&9734
POWER AOAPTOR*
r ENSURE THAT
BACKBOX IS OF SUFFICIEI{T DEPTH IO
ACOo|flIODA1E BELAY IN ACCORDANCE
WTIH NEC AFflCLE 3M.
*r 1n&9734 POWEB PACK mUST OU T O}l 4- SOUAFE BOX.
WHEN THE 209&9734 POWER ADAPTOR IS USED, OI{LY
SUPPLE EiFARY FUNCTIONS CA}' 3E PERFORIIED FNOII
THE DETECTOR.
DErEcroB /A /A DErEcron2oe&e2ol@ (@*'*
.** WHEN TT Is [EcEssARY To IouiIT THE a,98€d'5 DETECToR BASE To A
4'-S(UARE ELECTRICAL AOX. THE FOLLOWIIG ADAPIOR PLATES ARE
RECOI|'ENDED:
(SUPPUED BY OTHERS)
RACO, t767SIEELCt r52.C.9t/2
TYPE: RAISED 1^2",OPE , WITH
EAR{i 2.3/r" O.C.ffio
\
Gardner, Massach usetts 01441-0001 u.s.A.
Offices and Representatives Throughout the World
All sp€cjfications and olher infonnation shoun wgre cunent as ol publicalion, and are subJect to change without notico. Prlnlsd in U.S.A.
S,Simplex
o
Mu lti-Appl ication Peri pherals
and Accessories
o
S.Simplex
UL, ULC Listed
FM Approved
Heat Detectors
4098-Series
Electronic Design
o
FEATURES:
. UL Listed to Standard 521
. Accurate Thermal Detection for Protection of
Property.
. Fixed Temperature Operation for 60 Ft.
UUULC Spacing
. Fixed with Rate-of-Rise Operation for 70 Ft.
UUULC Spacing
. Epoxy Encapsulated Electronic Design
Provides:
Thermistor Based Fixed Temperature
Sensing
Dual Thermistor Rate-of-Rise Sensing
Fixed Temperature Sensing with Rate
Compensation
Self-Restoring Operation
Repeatable Accuracy
Current Limited Alarm Compatible with
Two Wire Initiating Device Circuits
4098 SERIES HEAT DETECTOR
MOUNTED IN A 2098.9211 BASE
DESCRIPTION:
Simplex 4098 series electronic heat detectors orovide
performance that is a significant improvement over
traditional mechanical heat detection. Electronic
tracking of thermistors provides temperature sensing
that quickly, accurately, and consistently identif ies when
fixed temperatures are exceeded or when rate-of-rise
iemperature changes occur.
Rate-of-rise is determined by comparing two thermistor
responses. By combining accurate thermistors with
proper physical placement, this patentedt rate-of-rise
detection design achieves a high level of performance
not normally achievable with mechanical detection.
Rate-of-rise oerformance meets FM reouirements for
operation at an ambient temperature increase of
between 1S"F/min and 25"F/min (8.33'C/min and
13.88'C/min).
All 4098 series heat detector models used with the
2098-9536, 4 wire base are compatible with initiating
device circuits (lDCs) using Alarm Verification.
The heat detector LED will be on continuously when
connected to a conventional IDC when in alarm. When
used with addressable bases, the base LED is the
alarm indicator and will be on continuously when in
alarm.
ru.s Patent No. 5.450.066.
. Models Available for Direct Connect Wiring
or for Two or Four Wire Base Mount
. Compatible with MAPNET ll@ Addressable
Bases-.(135"F Models)
. Alarm Indicating LED
. International Models Available
SPECIFICATIONS:
Voltage Range ............ .....15 to 32 VDC
(Filtered DC with 30% Maximum Ripple)
Standby Cunent........... ...80 pA nominal
Alarm Cunent, Direct Connect..........50 mA @ 24 VDC
Alarm Current, Base Connect. ..........24 mA @ 24 VDC
Maximum Ambient Temperature Guideline
135"F Models .......,.........32'F to 122"F (0"C to 50"C,
200"F Models .................32'F to 185'F (0'C to 85'C)
Humidity Range ............ ..... 10% to 95%
Co|or.............. Otf-White
Mounting/Base Compatibility ........ See chart on page 2
. MOST FIBES PRODUGE HAZARDOUS LEVELS OF SMOKE
AND TOXIC GASES BEFORE A HEAT DETECTOR WOULD
INITIATE AN ALARM. FOR LIFE SAFETY REOUIREMENTS
SMOKE DETECTION IS REQUIRED.
't MAPNET ll addressable communications is orotected under US
patent No. 4,796,025.
@ 1996 Simplex Tjmo Recorder Co.Publication 54098-0007-6 4-96
APPLICATIONS REFERENGE:
Heat detectors are used where property protection is
desired and where life safety protection is not required.
The combination of rate-of-rise and fixed temperature
detection provides two forms of heat detection for use
where temperature fluctuations are normal. For
conditions where temperature fluctuations are extreme,
fixed temperature detection is appropriate.
TEMPERATURE GUIDELINES:
135'F (57"C) f ixed temperature detectors are lor normal
temperatures that do not exceed 100'F (38"C).
200'F (93"C) fixed temperature detectors are for normal
temperatures that exceed 100'F (38"C) but are less
than 150"F (68'C).
o
U.S. AND CANADIAN- MODEL SELECTION CHART
MODEL-OPEBATION
UL AND ULC
MAXIMUM SPACING
FM MAXIMUM
SPACING
MOUNTING/BASE
COMPATIBILITY
4098-9401 135"F (s7"C) Fixed
Temperature
60x60ft
(18.3 x 18.3 m)
1Sft x 15tt
(4.5m x 4.5m)
Direct Connect
(lncludes Adaptor Plate)
4098-9402 135'F (57'C) Fixed and
Rate-olRise
70x70ft
(21.3 x 21.3 m)
30ft x 30ft
(9.1m x 9.1rn)
4098-9403 200"F (93'C) Fixed
Temperature
60x60ft
(18.3 x 18.3 m)
1Sftx 15ft
(4.5m x 4.5m)
4098-9404 200"F (93'C) Fixed and
Rate-of-Rise
7O x7O ft
(21.3 x 21.3 m)
30ft x 30ft
(9.1m x 9.1m)
4098-9407 135'F (57'C) Fixed
Temoeraiure
60x60ft
(18.3 x 18.3 m)
1Sft x 15ft
(4.5m x 4.5m)2098-9211 (2 wire)
2098-9536 (4 wire)
2098-9651 (MAPNET il)
2098-96s2 (MAPNET il)4098-9408 135'F (57'C) Fixed and
Rate-otRise
70 x70 ft
(21.3 x 21.3 m)
30ft x 30fi
(9.1m x 9.1m)
4098-9409 200"F (93'C) Fixed
Temperature
60x60ft
(18.3 x 18.3 m)
1Sftx 1Sft
(4.5m x 4.5m)2098-9211 (2 wire)
2098-9536 (4 wire)
4098-9410 200"F (93'C) Fixed and
Flate-otRise
70x70tt
(21.3 x 21.3 m)
30ft x 30ft
(9.1m x 9.1m)
.ULC models are designated with a "C" suffix (example: 4098-9401C).
INTERNATIONAL MODELS SELECTION CHART
RATING/CLASS
2098-9211 (2 wire)
2098-9536 (4 wire)
2098-9651 (MAPNET il)
2098-96s2 (MAPNET il)
2098-9211 (2 wire)
2098-9536 (4 wire)
2098-92'11 (2 wire)
2098-9536 (4 wire)
2098-e6s1 (MAPNET il)
2098-9652 (MAPNET il)
HEAT DETECTOR ACCESSORIES
MODEL DESCRIPTION BASE COMPATIBILITY
2098-9804 Remote LED Indicator on Single Gang
Stainless Steel Plate
2098-9211 (2 wire)
2098-9536 (4 wire)
2098-9737 Relay, DPDT Contacts, 1A @ 30 VDC,
112 A@ 120 VAC, Resistive 2098-9536 (4 wire)
2098-9739 End-of-Line Relay For 4 wire Circuits using 2098-9536 Base,
One per Circuit
2098-9744 Remote LED Indicator on Single Gang
Stainless Steel Plate 2098-96s1 (MAPNET il)
DIMENSIONS:
BASE DIAMETER HEIGHT
Direct Connect 411116" (119mm)21/4" (57mm\
2098-9211 5 7/8" (149mm)2114" (57mm\
2098-9536 6 1/2" (155mm)2 3/8" (60mm)
2098-9651 & -9652 61/2" (165mm)1 15/16" (49.2mm)
Or***o,
NOTE: REFERTO INSTALLATION
INSTRUCTIONS PER-21.031
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
ADAPTOR PLATE
(SUPPLIED WITH
DIRECT CONNECT
MODELS)
4" OCTAGONAL
BOX11/2"DEEP
(BY OTHERS)
BASES SUPPLIED
SEPARATELY (REFER
TO SELECTION
cHAETS)
DIRECT CONNECT IIODELS
WITH SCREW TERMINALS BASE MODELS WITH
SLIDE CONTACTS
APPLICATIONS REFERENGE:
(NOTE: Refer to NFPA 72, the National Fire Alarm Code, for additional information)
MAXIMUM RECTANGULAR AREA DIMENSIONS FOR SINGLE DETECTOR COVERAGE
15 ft Rated Spacing
(4.sm)
30 ft Rated Spacing
(9.1m)
60 ft Rated Spaclng
(18.3m)
70 ft Rated€yacing
1sft x 15ft
(4.5m x 4.5m)
30ft x 30ft
(9.1m x 9.1m)
60ft x 60ft
(18.3m x 18.3m)
70ft x 70ft
(21 .3m x 21 .3m)
1Oft x 18.7ft
(3m x 5.7m)
25ftx34.2ft
(7.6m x 10.4m)
55ft x 64.6ft
(16.7m x 19.7m)
65ft x 74.5ft
(19.8m x 22.7m)
Sft x 20.6ft
(1.5m x 6.2m)
20ftx37.4ft
(6.1m x 11.4m)
50ft x 68.5ft
(15.2m x 20.8m)
60ft x 78.7ft
(18.3m x 24m)
1ft x 21.19ft
(0.3m x 6.4m)
1Sft x 39.7ft
(4.5m x 12.1m)
45ltx72lr
(13.7m x 21.9m)
55ft x 82.3ft
(16.7m x 25m)
1Oft x 41..2ft
(3.5m x 12.5m)
40ft x 74.8tt
(12.2m x 22.8m)
50ft x 85.4ft
(15.2m x 26m)
5ft x 42.1ft
(1.5m x 12.8m)
35ft x 77.3ft
(10.6m x 23.5m)
45ft x 88.1ft
(13.7m x 26.8m)
1ftx 42.4ft
(0.3m x 12.9m)
30ft x 79.3ft
(9.1m x 24.1m)
40ft x 90.5ft
(12.2mx27.sml,
25ftx81ft
(7.6m x 24.7m)
35ft x 92.6ft
(10.6m x 28.2m)
20tt x 82.4ft
(6.1m x 25.1m)
30ft x 94.3ft
(9.1m x 28.7m)
1Sft x 83.5ft
(4.5m x 25.4m)
25ft x 95.7ft
(7.6m x 29.1m)
1Oft x 84.2ft
(3.05m x 25.6m)
20ft x 96.9ft
(6.1m x 29.5m)
Sft x 84.7ft
(1.5m x 25.8m)
1Sft x 97.8ft
(4.5m x 29.8m)
1ft x 84.85ft
(0.3m x 25.8m)
1Oft x 98.4ft
(3.05m x 30m)
Sft x 98.8ft
(1.5m x 30.1m)
1ft x 99ft
(0.3m x 30.1m)
@o
Gardner, Massachusetts 01.t41 -0001 U.S.A.
Otfices and Rspresentatives Throughout lhe World
All specilicalions and olher inlormation shown wers currenl as ol publication, and arg subjsct to change without notice. Pdntod in U.S.A.
II.Simplex
TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROADvArL, co 81657
97 0-47 9-21,38
Job Address...:Location......:
Parcel No. -. -.:Proiect Number:
L74 E GORE CREEK DR
LODGE AT VAIIJ INTERN'L WING
2r01-082-2 3-009
PRJ96-0054
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
MECHANICAL PERMIT Permit #! M97-0099
Status. . .Applied..Issued...
Expires. .
I S SUED
o6 /24 / ree'7
o6 /24 /ree7
12 /2r /ree7
APPLICANT
CONTRACTOR
OWNER
Investigation>
lliLL Cat t---->
FALCON PLUMBING &
3187 MESA AVENUE,
FALCON PLUMBING &
3187 MESA AVENUE,
LODGE PROPERTIES
T74 E GORE CREEK
.00
3.00
Descript.ion:
MECHANICAL FOR NEW ADDITION
Fireptace Infornation: Restricted: Y flOl Gas Appl,iances:
HEATING Phone:
GRAND JUNCTION CO 81504
HEATING Phone:
GRAND JUNCTION CO 81504
INC
DR, VArL CO 81657
Valuation:
#Of cas Logs:
.00 Additional, Fees---------> .OO
TOTAL FEES-----7,851.00
97 04340556
97 04340ss6
313,091 . 00
#0f l'lood/Pa I let :
*ffi**ffi**ffi******************ft**********ff*ff*rr**t** FEE SUI'lilARY **********tr***ffi*****#trr*******************ffi****
l,lechani ca t---)6,280.0O Restuarant Ptan Revi ev-->.00 TotaI caLcutated Fees--->7,E55.00
PLan Check---> 1.570.00 DRB
TotaI Permit Fee-------->
Pavments-------
7, 853 .00
7,853.00
Dept: BUILDING Division:
Dept: FIRE Divj_sion:
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
* ***** * * * * * * * * * * * ** *** ****** ** *** * **** * ** *** * * * * *** ***** t ** * * * * *** * * * * * *** * * * * * *
DECLARATIONS
I.hereby.acknorrtedge that I havr read this aPpl.ication, fitLed out in futL the infornation required, compteted an accurate pl.otptan, and state that atl the information provided as required.is correct. r agree to compl,y riith the iniormation and pLot btan,to compl'y vith al'l' Town ordinances and state Laws, and to buitd this structure according io'the Town's zonint ana subdivisioncodes, design feviev approved, Uniform Buitding Code and other ordinances of the Town appLicabl,e thereto.
REOUESTS FOR INSPECTIONS SHALL BE I.IADE TI.IENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AI 479-2138 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROI.I E:OO AI,I 5:OO PI4
SIGNATURE OF OI'NER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HII{SELF AND OIINER
Item: ,O51OO BUILDING DEPARTMENTo6/24/1997 CHARLIE Action: AppRIT.em!' 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
"t,''ti. o o
.
'*Contact
Eagle Courity Aeaessore-ffice
l['^i.3J'r1,ft3'-'&i":*f:'h. TH,,;; Xi;lr$83f;"F3ii. -PER]trr
r--
D rE? wq7 PPtq6-oosl
It)ttT'r/rllrr'Pla I
08/21/07 U:33 FAI 308 431 4888 FALCON PLIIItsING Eooz
^ t APPI{IcATlol$ uUSf FE aIIJLED oul couPLETELY oR lT MAy ItoE BE AcctpqpEDarX****************************'t pERltIt INFOil4ATfON ***************i**********i**,l [ ]-Bulldlng [ ]-prunbtng I l-Erectrlcal pg-Mechanlbal I J_other
rob Name; L+lgr n* \leil Acb"r,atu-l il.Ag Job Addresss
Legal Descriptions Lot_ Block_ flling
or4rners Name: Of,f^tonners Name: Orrrib. hfrt+ thbb Address: L;*, E-gl",r{ nr.ArchLtect:@ Address; | , Cotnj^ prr.
General Description:
lfork Class: [ ]-Nen I J-Atteratlon [ ]_AddLttonat I l-Repair [ ]-Otner
Nuuber of Orrelll_ng Units:Nunber of AccommodatLon Unlts:
Electrlcal contractor:
Addreee:
. Plunbing
Address:
Mecbanical Contractor:
Address:
********************************FORBUT'JDING PERMIT FEE:
PLI,IIIBING PERI'IIT FEE:
I.IECIIAIIICAL PER}TIT 8EE:
EI.IECTRTCAL FTE:
OTHER SYPE OF FEE;
DRB FEE:
_,__ G3s Logs l{oodr/pel1et
* * ****** ***** ***** **** ******** ***
Town of Val.l
Phone Nunber:
Town of Vail
Phone Number:
lown of, Vail
Phone Nunber:
Reg. NO.
oFFrcE usE *************** *
BUU,DING PIAN CHECX FEE:
PLT'MBING PIAN CITECK FEE:!'IECIIANICT,!, PI.AN CHECK FEE
.RECR8,ITION F8E:
CLEIAN-UP DEPoSItr:
TOTAL PERUr! FEES:
EUTIJDTNG:
STGNATURES
ZONTNG:
SIGNATI'RE!
Contractor:
*******t** *****.
ollDeD{tr I
GLEA! UP DFOsrr xErsm m:
OA/24/97 1lr33 FAI 303 '136543{
o FALCON PLI'ITBINC [D oor
FAX
To:
Fax #:
Subject:
Date:
Pages:
Town of Vail Community Dev - ATTN: CIIARLIE
t-970479-2452
Lodge at Vail Inrernational Wirg Mechanical pennit
Iune24.1997
2, including this cover sheet.
COMMENTS:
I un providing the Permit Applfoation Form for the Permit at the Lodge at Vail
International Wing. I have calculated the fee ro I need you to confirrn this
arnount to me before I mdl the check. Thank vou yow
iertP yL'T-H
>u6 ,U't'(-q7U' t- a---\0I/
Frorn the dck d...
llouglrs A Wang3lln
Comptrofier
Fdcq| Plumung ard Hsaflng
318't iresa Av$ue, Sdts A
Grrtd JurElimr CdoF+. 01504
(970) 43+05s6
Fsr (g7O) 4q/LJ-1r65
l2/O9/57 l2t17 FI97 9El
Date:
To:
From:
Pages:4
INITNATIONAL ING0t7sEo [! or
fire
Loots @ Vtnu
Tuesday, December 09, 1997
Town of Vail
Charlie Davis
Art Hougland
Phone: 970479-2453Fax: 97M79-2452
SHAW Construction
Scot Lowry
Phone: 970-479{980Fax: 97|0.479{98f
Subject:
IodgcrtVrilRrtcdrDoon 6_a _fl
Opnonr # 3 kt*rnELL
- f|lt"*f Sr-r Stt+tot''te FbA
rldAft<' NnY\tr I cArlol{
Droe pep.n" eraauT
D,Ao €^lD Cql'roe tSS,4 Lrs"u4
4ilus f l+DA '(a" nA/)(.€. ErtT- S,aruS
Lt.o+'tcO TD Z etxa*l, rr*SSoc '7,
"vr
(os*
C.Q
12/09/97 12t37 FAI 9704798981
$IIAlry
Gonstruction
Decernber 9,l99il
To: MiLcMcGcc
Art Houghnd
INTENATIONAL ING AAoz
Dir*Dunn
Fnom: Scot Lowry
Dcar Mke, Dic\ Charlie, John and Art:
Thank you for taking the time to mcet with us to diecuss the rated doors for the ladge at Vail. The
following is a reap ftom our meeting on Friday, December 56 at the construction trailer.
Attendees: Dick Duraq Mike McGee, fut Hougland, Charlie Davis, Scot Lowry, John Volponi
T60liodzmDdw
fuinctioq C\C8f506(n0t 242-y236 t f (gfr) 24 1-561r
CherlicDlvir
Jobn Volponi
ITEM DESCTIPIION
l.l Sweral doors were field modified ro conect the factory hardware preparation. It was agreed
that if the doors were to 1sx11rin, proper doo.rmentation would bc required to vatidate the
labels. Thesc doors will all be replaced therefore no fi.rther action will be taken.
1.2.Applied paneling to I %'60 minute and 90 minute doors was discusscd. The overall thickness
of these doors after the appliqud panels is 2 Vt". T\e dccisiou was made that these doors were
unacceptablg cvcn on a temporary basis, beoruse the labcl could not be verified due to tle
modifications made.
1.3 Mike McGee srggested that we contact Dick Gheen with Buell doors to look into
rcplacements frr the 2 7r" doors. It was thought that Dick may have doors in stock that we
could use on a temporary basis. Dick confirmed thar 2 t/r" flush or raised panel doors are not in
stock urd woutd have to be special ordered. Ihe I r/." doors that he could provide would not
be better or frster than the I tZ" doors dready ordered by SHAW.
t.4 The following solutions were discussed urd accepted by rll:L Option l: 2 Vt" tenporary flush doors would be ordered and machined in a UL approved
shop to replace all modificd 60 and 90 minute doors. Since 2 t/r" flush doors need to be
special ordaed, this opioo will not be feasible because the doors would not be ready in
time to open the Hotel.
2. Option 2'. l'A" lernporary flush doors would be ordered \rith constnrction labels- The
doors would be sized by the mamrfactrre. All hardware rmchining would be done on site.
P€rmanent 2 Vt" crt$Lom raised panel rated doors would be ordered to replace the
tcmporaries. If this opion is pursued, Mike, Cherlie and Art rryould like to rret with the
hardware installer, as a prerequisite to accepting the ffeld machining, to convey what
standards of qualiry will b€ elrpcctod.
INIENATIONAL TNG
$IIf,wl
SIIAW Construotion will purzue Option 3 to solve the door problem first. OSion 2 will be pursrcd only
ifwe cannot get the doos nachined in time by a Certified Shop. Wc will also apply the applique on the
pcrimaer ofthc doon in either case as discrrssed abovc.
The above is my interpretation of what was discusecd. Please respond immediately if you disagree with
any of the information abovc and I will make the appropriate edits. Sincc the information that resulted in
Option 3 became available after the meeting, I would appreciate if weryone will confirm that the above is
acceptable by initialing below and fa:<ing a copy back to (970) 479-8981. Thank you.
l2/OS/57 L2':37 FAI 970{798981
Mike McGee
Art Hougland
oc:ARC
Clark Atkinson
Iohn lhnsen
@03
Charlie Davis
John Volponi
760 Horizon Drivc
Gtod Inctioq C0 t1506
(.yn)242-v2Xl f (9m) 24r-J6rr
Gonstruction
3.Option 3: After further discussion whh a local door shop, it may be possible to have the I
7r" doors machined locally by a uL ceftifid shop in time. Tlrc l'/t" doors would be
maohined to work in the frames designed for the 2 %" doors, but the doors would have a
label (as opposed to construction labels). 2%" pernanerrt raised paneled doors with labels
will b€ ordered to permanently reptace the above doors.
1.5 Becarrso I %" doors will be used in the 2 %" frames, there will be a discrepancy at the jamb in
regards to the smoke seal making contact to the jamb, It was proposed by telephone to Mike
McGec and Charlie Davis on Tuesday l?9 by Scot that dt/t" x 518" applique could be
attached to the perimeter of the doq to correct the disclepancy (see attached diagram). Mike
said this would bo scceptable on the temporary doors as long as the applique is mechanically
fa*encd (scrervrs, brads, etc) without using any glue. Charlie Davis stated this would be
acoeptable as well.
1.6 Scot Lowry inquired ifthe dead end conidor issue at Lobby l0l was resolvcd with Chadig
Art and Mke. It was confirmed by all that the eirplanation provided by Zelren & Asrcciates
was acc€Dteble and no firrther action was requirod for TCO in recards to this natt€r.
I2/O9/57 12.37 FAtr 97 98104798o INTENATIONAL WNG Eb 04
,/r/"t Ve' /E,u^ea*-
fi<?t- a-vE-
*
tvt eaw*i.r rCq7g2stt
N9 e'uoe
( e*tn)
Y ,/,,,pt-- t o- v L ( an*
^
S t { *rr'
qo o,u6o 4,P DeoA
a/
Hm
''
:
ltE/O{i97 rJ: tI FA.t 970{78898I. o{us. 1. l99hc 4:SSF}b0ssrfiHREN AllD ASS(ICIA,!&---'--- O
INIENATIONAL WNG
ZI}NEF FI-}O.EY AS @os
No. 0810 P. 1,/l s.
2@9st DcYrtzt sb l, s& FC NA t"el?inrrrHtudlcY
& A*irir
tl urtnt 0 Fcrye.rryi1\l O frPurg/rf S Plcucumt
(olro r\\N \$3. PecFrlEs
trnlrlnl:
' tROLbrrO4 $=fiEE3S -q\O$\)
l*n A*.cgrTAG,LrL
*effirgB-OCWIIoFEITI
t!RETS'IE
*!lo EFa.rfl ra-rla.t l aFaE
G ltdrFcrul ittltt- aEE:ttl
!t. Enrlr: atfr tfa i --t-r--+*--tr.'-|t|.-'l-rrrE-I-r-lI..f rcn tF.drrltt- -ltE:' Itr6r t ctlar F}i'-arE |I
rergg r orn-l t!s.d*r -'
sJlCa|l*a
*c-7!/3- tf,rtr rn'lra-:v r--
DrGUErro jr\o le{tENttE,-
_cAur 1 l99?_14 d:S5PUFsseZEHREli AltD ISSOC jA
'-= '.-.rr,tt, €a:f2 rrfafrr Fx...ra -H""Sffi30
5' alrl:__--,J r/u/1'.lz
I
rr\rti\AItUNAL WNU
ZII\fiER HI'O'EY A@ No. C8l0
@o4?. 4/7 63
F.(13 A2
*
I
iw
I
I
I
Loqas e y'rrre-
,;1
u
.rJl
Danish CrQsrnen, Inc.
SPECI,ALTY CONTRACTI NG
2480GRAY STREET
EDGE$/AilER CO 80214
t303) 233-? 149 Fax 233'4347
Reference: Inbmational Wing - Lodge at Vail
Vail, Colorado
December41997
Shaw Cmstnrction C-ompany
todgeA,tVail
174 E.:Gcg CrockDrive
vail, CO t1657
Arm.:Scot Lowry
Subjm:Doors
&r{S7€crtr*>rlt fltG W,S
Dear Scot,
Encloscd ls several documents pertaining to the fire rated doors that we have pr:rchased for
this p,roject. Danish Craftsmen, Inc. specifrcally followeO plans and specificadons to
provi& tbe proper ftre rated doors.
We have cncloscd information from the door company where the doors werc purchased
and a list of door nrrmbers and ratings.
Door numbcr Size Rating
ll4A PR 4'X 8'
1I4B PR 4'X E'
ll'lc PR 4'X 8'
llSA PR 4,X 6'8"
30lA 4'X 6,8"
3@A 3'X 6,E"
40lA 4',X 6'8"
403C 3'X 5'g'
405A 3',X 6't"
50lA 4'X 6,E'
504.4 3'X 6't"
106A 3'6" X 8'
rflA 3'6" X E'
2,fYt A .r a*l dPnof ir" :^Y.: -,WW*-,;:
/'-' oPrcxf'fi^P \
90 min.
90 min-
90 min.
9o min. t'Y"<
eomin. affw
X) min.
X)min.
9O min.
90 mrn.
9O min.
9O min.
6O min.
60 min.
60 min.
2o min. aT
20 min-
A/o Lo u'"t' n
O*US tltr.ortvPt)
n,t*ct+ttrlE
Fto?-'.DhJ3et*l o*,Is
,^I h e(b
sa0lrn€S"tJ'lfl,t"?t Lrcva
.D+ fpocF 6F oe6OL
FoZ flnli- DaoAS
srbP
-.il r{t\rs/'t\t6'rnLL H41a4/neL Y*tBS
EEO DEO 6* t tt ttc /Vo-p ilo0r ry Stzf*S*aoz
Smts thnsts
l03A
lo4A
302A
?o3A
307.1A
37lA
37t.6A
372A
374A
375i|
376A
37'tA
37EA
379A
4U2A
{o3A
47tA
472A
473A
474A
475A
476A
477A
47EA
4EOA
502A
503A
57lA
5724
573A
AII other doors on site fir not raed-
Sincecly,
DANISH CRAFTSMEN,INC.
3'X 6'E"
3'.X 6,8"
3'X 6'9"
3'6" X 6',E"
3'X 6',E"
PR 2'6" X 6'8,'
3'X 6,E"
3',X 6',8"
3'X 6'8"
3'X 5'8"
3',X 6'8"
PR 2'6" X 6'8
3',x 6,8"
3'X 6'8"
3'X 6',E"
3',6" X 6'8"
PR 2'6" x 6'8"
3',X 6'9"
PR 2'6 X 6'8.'
3'X 6'g'
3'x 6'E"
3'X 6'E"
3'X 6'8'
3'X 6't"
3'X 6'8"
3'6" X 6'E"
PR 2',6" X 6'8,,
2'6', X 6,E"
3'X 6'8"
PR 2'6" X 6'E.'
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min-
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min-
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
2O min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
20 min.
John Hansco
Danish Craftsmen, Inc.
specrurycorvrnac.nruc
2480GRAY STREE-T
EDGEWAIER CO8O2I4
(3O3) 23ii-2t49 Fax 233-+I|47
Derember 4 1997
llly9qgftion CompanyrodgeArvsil
f74 E. Gorc Creek Drivevail, CO 8165?
Aul Scottowry
Reftrcnce: Intemational Wing _ Lodge ar Vail
Subj6cl' Door Cladding
DearScot,
All 90 m'nue and 60 minute doon for this projecr ,nar have been cladded, have beencladded by the following procedure. ' -v.vrwa t
l ' Pmers grued with go NFM adhesive, materiar safety daa sieet atached-
2 ' Solid or veueer Mapre r.ug ueen anachcd ar thc p€rime@r with warer base Tibbondtr Whire slue TitebonAn;ilff;:fiyilo rn.", anached.3- ffiPo or vencer Maple and paners ."e rhcn craruped in a' areas unrrl rhe grue is
4. The doors are then finished sanded.
Sincerely,
DA}.IISH CRAFTSMEN, INC.
John tlrrsen
- .rt" rr$
gn*dA*en
d/
Best
copfes
Available
?ta-356-at ro
? Ia-l?3-6OOO (ll-l !E-5p
TERIAI. SAF DATA SHEET
lll)
ETY
thata e*irr.t r: nLd !e trtta drft
a rrt et tvLlt ifl'rtatrcra |.-t.t-t. Ctnltr.{ lfEi:i3le' d3Ffil-rr. n r
contotrl!! c*trcl
lUI A
?ioutq! ctl|lr
^
!
ult n
WUAGI'III C
ht3tYEs
to rt|i
t.D. cttt0ra
ltdIlL
rc(utit
cln fr-
toE-E3-l ?Lv-wAo3xA-?tLOi|l-tIlLotlfl-cEl Lrfl 1.t
?5-09-l rLV-TlATtt-3ttLotltl-tl(
oSttA-31!Lo3rl-< € I LLFL 16- O
6a7{2-tH rlFl
llrEt
trtl3lt
tarr
3xlr r
t?r&20 lao I.trFlc!-r-
lEE?i2
r t!01126ut|. 7 i
17t
Itc7000tto0UFL 4', O
IqDG?
,TO NIH
t iI
22
tto
7?
L
LI
o
U2I
ItI
,
I
lr
CQtfL9lt
L
uI
t
st
rt tt,l tI llAtLtrc?at ?.c
I
?It
o
?tItIl
:L.1,!!Ltti/l;lt Ll
Irt^tlLlrr Llitl ftlctxtrrrrll LllY Lltll iEnctl|ror??lcx iu 3l lE coi!t0tt€c ls
^r. tIt03ul€ LEYCL SlrOUL0 lrO? alrll ltcorrlr! tD €xtotutl Llrltar a rro!u I I tl;ttltlcrL tt 3u9rccl ro tlt0rttia3.^ - r.A. a0 stl t^rr f?l
rourE ol frtoEdl!Erctt0[D t0t arY
tr0tlrtttE ?t Ot t€
?lic rttloc
cTloi !rl
lrDl fatlon etl. Yrtrt.
t.eittrttC
nct / aia ||allr
sauta ac9ia. 6lra tn.rr,
n et Calbolt-at., a rDaclll ty
PPt|
t0
?00to0t0c
5o
000ooo
.00
-iil&c -
drErEordE
Cri c|rre o a a t ? c t n t . a t i n a t \r"itttic,r, r.ntarr aFa voalt:n9-
uilJdfcf t iito tunt t.y Gruet 3h.tl..l ttrcvlonirir vhrcn c.6
irt !E tr?lL l? ?oo iuctr t3 !rEllxtDlli?rl!!la1 hcirt aondltlortr rry ba .ggf .vrtrd by atPo.e". totbta?ta..-lrp-rrii- lS .ttlott^r:fd roly.otr t./ ..8! t t tn liv.r r.d lidr.nrltllfllon.0vrrrtCdrt?a rry easta ungcnre 1oe!nttt rna 90l3ibl,a dG.th-lat caitaa o6rr 6t thloat lrrltlr{6Ir. Fiqi c6nccat'.ticnt aatcahttat i!tyoul rt r l.t dcgrrrlron Gltattattr{ lcc b/ hGagacha,aarrala ara catrturlo,r.laau.aa t'tra iL.cd't ixyoen-c.r?yl^s Cagt.ity by th. f o?arl'ioh!aoCtoDta. lGdoCad bt55C crygrh lEvcti ray- le- h..rtuL lo !r
.t iOl a llt'| art.titrg i..rt al--ara.all
Sf*a t aasat tyr lr.!rrtion.
lat Do tla6.b.a aIr..{ai 3lr. a\ln rn h.rrtsl .rcar.a.
=-=*ltJ ll&fl'llilr$sl l' I t' t I o''
llDortt hara ||rcc{atca 9rotonead In6 rcDcat.d c c€ug. t r coa t I'rtatpo..rr.to'rr(vloia rlta taraanohr Drrfo lnd nalie .rr 3y.t.a c.raca. lalaatrcaal,!larte.tt aqttDa"atatt concGnt|.atlig and inlittrit tbr cont.rilt .at D.r:rr*!€S'LdLlH lr-r rn= rocllrr l!!vrrc! p lur Errril-a.alttara Cltartar hat brio id.r-tti.d aa a rota.tlrl e.r.laca?i fr ti.Itt"iaatlara t laan c r to. lar..crh cD cat oa t llatc a ror4o 2l - trcDabIa L..ratC.tt-ln.l!r, rhd- !r i rubat a?|cc 'l.r.ai.btt lnt!tiD!!.d le l. f -9atc!ncaan'!t ttra iatloial, ?oricotoay troar.. (llt Siout :). Ttrtc clrrriticatlcna r?a!4. fi ao aiirtl rt{dltr (llic t rr:e: yI|lah indlqatrd a dora tat.t.dtoc'laatt.at It loia. llv.. .nd aar!a.r tutg.r, |.s.an rDla.aO(sica( atuala.l-nalGala ttr.at li.-rgtaatiat, Ot|.Cl!oC1^lC rtlrct o? a C t lr y t c . ? - C h l. . r I d a f.qca ? aarl'|!ant. Tiir l. rrrDDort.d b; tha oDrorv.tion ol'rn incrlarrdraClaan3a €t (tv.'t oanCCt iubaoauODt tc IrtOi lrDo.uro (t4O -a70 Crr, ta a?!ra !'aodsctloi 9lrlrt. ,orka.r {n anoth.. tacllity vho ucre rxDcilirt to a.uci lQrar. conc.or.ation (e6 lFr) ahcuCd trc inctC-rr i^ caura iFrctttc
;t?xYLerE cH(ollDl. ; 6-F
./, -G F Nnol9tE-
^!ltrlllc)rtDtoc^llot
& ill c'ElEo|OE
a/''r eBsAEAaeaE r O I 5NrJ,n3tbtsro Nogltv.r,ltorJ ?e.60 z,g_90_clo
rrDtDa
Ctlott O? FatDirrtOty taolrGtior ar9.'rdt utcn ra6t taCtCtllFriio6/tevrt of rriciura aDd coadit{onr ct urc. ll arrrrrIa?aat | 3 ohaaicrtr buGh ar tho.a conaaiG.d ia tl|l! D-attcl rrrtfta ura ot rarti.rtef y groacctton it urcC t^ ualt vait{talaa'rrtalcr.d ytrti\arion i:.L.r . t|lotll tDgr0vad €hariE.t ca?rridecart Da l.agtiraa- uo€aa oa|.:rit ccad:rIon3. Iuab a.3!t?|yroo. I
? | - ! I ! I ! I - ! i y - ! t ! 9 !r r!qulr?E._Irr q9!!?tni9 qqqr; uql l-.lrElll
.rto3rta-ta a?aat l'3 ohaaicrtr LuGh ar tho.a conaaiG.d ia tt|l! D-attct rrti.a .atll "r tfta Ula Ot rarti.rlefy Drctcctlon it urcC t^ ualt vait{talaa'rtaa!- Ltr ltltatcla.t yI'tti\arion a:.Lar a t|lotll tDDrcvad €hlriert ca?tridoaaatltaSol alt Da l.agtiraa- uo€aa oa|.rrit ccad: rIon3. tu.b a. 3D?trroo. Ir?!tr!tc.t ,t-tltttr rry atrc Da,.!aUlrGO. irt cCittnit rrrrt url r-rl!llliltr att?aveC alr a.rttllaa tatgirrtar.. It t tt. ?Lv'r (f.toa l. r.crtan ll'."a ar!traaa .,r. a D-'aoa.Ly tlttaat rlOS|./rtrl reerovcd |".rDlraCc? rlth.i!PDi9rltD?! ,ror.g!Ion _fIctor. lclcr r. 0tx^ e9"Cti ,tttO-1la .t.tplr.tortr.olactlo{r., tn0 .l.tFirrtc.r/ trot??ttotr I t.ns.l ^hd euidati.!a, laartcan
--tE4ll,ll|"lrt hyf i.'r. rt.cc-'
NIGIE
AG
Eltt
ATETC
ioDa
vetvat
?I CnII ot
vcntl tatlon ln aut tlci.ilr aou. {^o.cal.ata (l.i.a trt I t Cd. -i.roY. dc torle l I icytling, ?r bratlta cbJactri.l Y!rtrlrtion - I latrua
araf at df Iutien t^d tocrt !lh.nrtln. to l,aat egncrntrrClon. of lrarCI Dal,Or th. (oralI arDoar|.a llltt!lat lFa l.r.tatra rhi,l r.ldlnp.r! !nl! lroduc:. lr{cr ro .ln6Eir.a trastl s. ' /|tal,| :
ataI
afl
ia.ta3rahrat
aa
at
I
?
c
a
a
aI
,?aaaa?"CO
DrI.
r DC.rinl th. r!|cclt,lGaticr. cl Arsl llt.l urt.?. i.
I i r i .
r ! i : i : I R i i ! ! .
p I
|. 3: I : . I n I : I : : r ? ; : ; : . | . . ! . ;: I I , I ? t , ylhar- !oalrct rllh th. .yrr.
ta t att thorar,
aa? at tat Gaah eta.cr Lr ry trl florf3stotrL ( lrDUttltlL)cor! r f lctE. r eurLtrtSr occutltra-aLflrosullt to rrtr ?r000ct.rrErt t^v lEsuLt lr 0rrrt l0ut rlalolttlltout rfrL?t tt;ac?a rarcrt!tt ti
iiiiiiil!il;iifiilfi;iffiliiiiliii::iiiiiii;iifiii;ii:iii:iiiii;!ii;iii,iu
"eD?lata irprrtttbtr g(ov"t (iorth- S: tyrr Sfti atd)
MltC
lEL cllttn Dl
aaI l;3'na ot{t
a
t
t
lr
3l|Eurr--q,EtlrEg!.li'!,il"5i".tll.f!?lio!{tclt3' c)'t'?' !'trc rs'''trt t" In
rlrca aFd ra-urcd ,o. aDt-t9?toa.a not a D?ar.ura vat3ot-
t
!
3
I
: a ll
,,r,,,rr,.ri,,^.,,'iii!l?l!iiii?:rleb!Ile!"0..
?ir.r!?ir.urhr?il';l:i:il::!i!!ii: i"!u"or
riD6 coar !litiii.i;;li:ir i'€ffri:? t,*|ii:"!t.
( o*rr' 'iEilt:ililiilE silulil'.. o ,.l.!a ilal 6127; 2rt a.r:62- "
acntaosleaeLLtL'ATIr tiEttrt
caac 8ccoil
E Y,A
c ol.^u3l
lo g
r
Y
oa
C
I
C
YIt
i
cI
U
Ytoa
It
orI
D
'l
trat tYtr?trD,lotl
itbo!!tttt t,lt rta{at
"a tc
lita*ltriilorl-or Iaaaa
IuIo
I
a
a
I
II
D
tacatc?lrlIaa
tI
tta
aaattlttt!l
i t.lcr tftc?t
]?III
Ct!
cltlt
6.1
6,r
t .D.,
urt!91
urrrt!
rr -l
ltr
ttl
UlrSt! ltl
oororle
CNllAatrr.IalO Noatrv.f .Hortd rr.Ce /-a_So-ftoeE|gEBtgcoe . ol
llFECt D tr r'lt t'oatl]a t't,rttl|Er to nlor Elttt -
at|luar.lto!t tuatlcuaa ao act- {a{ucc v?rl?l?t. ga\( polto^ .crt?c\ c.rita", lrcrDlt.t
f[ j&ifl.t.t ...) o] psF iCi.n l.r.di-t.tr.
tiatva tC t raai .lr lracdiataty- tj Grcattta^q hrr rtCaDad- alva .rtalat tarrltatlcn. (GCp trrr r-nd tlei.t- aat rldtcrt rrtantlc; taaGdlItltlu.tr rttD l.rla aaouitr ol yrtt.. ttttina eDtat ahd lorot tldt ocaaa
glll ty, Coatloul ror lt (aaat 15 rirute!- e-t ..6lcat rrta'rrlon.
Da oca11..vt.3t!autlil3, - lltn.phr ina or aphad. i^. ray advaraatta lraatt rlall tatr( r...|lt.
ttt-.tatt.
lonat-
roat
ior&lp lll! ro. 03.. r. (
tftol Oclllf r..vte? th.n .ir-
r9rForralc lllralorar thai alaihtt Gtho..
4o ota.c.) ro 2Ct ota ,.(
| gct|lll.t rr l!t8 16
9e 2. ta 4ill L- r-.raEi
! . 7a Dy'trl -t.t
E. C.' l.o I lE
to? .tftlc^tra
arraa | -lcty-|l& tttl?;t. t?
o
.J
a
t uiabla r..y itott It "r I
Drtandtr
a..cattaa
ra
c
11$d[$naftaatlurr bgl lt-t cla h..l ?'!talna?t rcgrion rhai..1.|.ab1..
CO
P(
OOI .rtgradattlon or. arnottlaa ala
ctoo- Ifo
a tl0tea, ralalno rrllll_r d.3aata.iricr-a, ralatno .rct Or othC? blgh taata.rtura a.trr3aa yitch
rErac.ttIt0alaua
Ir T|DM F|,It tl rcO6I?IG
i i i i, ! 1
! ! : i ; i i ; i I ! i ! ! : I I i ! t i I i i : : . 3 i I : i i i i | ; I : . i i I i I : ; I i r i t : : : : : i ! r i i : .
lits rraacat .cnr.!toaa ltta?oarn chtcrBU?tt€Lr, Iota ltrrtclalir aral.t lcn..
l..ovc carl..l.at.a Gtorhtn€, t 3a r.trtlaaa at{n claar.r tot lcyoa It.ia vttaa y.rh. ODtaln aaataat attaotioD (l lrrltatrOn ra?rlrtr-l9loya .a4! aa! D.t ca c!otnr!e ,! t.th !fl.ct?a ara. riti rc-9 lnd vrtre
rcCe"i6lBrlffll.. t .ar.nrtoD tt lrrrtrticn r.rri!r! _
frtol! rt./ol. 10 . ?tr(cttlc alrtltY r.l
Frr rulIl''.rtT cnr|rtt4l-
"r*rlltrrt*'I.ta? al,?avant trrtol
!! ?cit rtra. c. .tl.tli. ..r.,.t.t..rrrr )roarat cOnt.l!! h!tot.n!tci !l!?ocar!oa! yticrr .a, rGact ytthl!9.!Dr.rt. aror.d ccrt.cr virh r r. u r i i i ; - - i ; : ; i i u i I i i 'i . - i 6 il ; i i i iil'ir",r1..t o. .1. r. t. d or ln rhtcb triciion. ..}' rc iiir;ia;. 'iio-idi'uie--iiiy::*iiiffi' l.::,: :
i i' a ; ;' -;" ; ;
r!0 0ac.c.)
tOt 9rA L.8 rar.a a ! c u Lr t ? O
45r t/l dlA cA!(uL^rEo
lllQt- lD E arEf rt !|tnrrl. rr ttrJrrE or rttrr-
iii.Ii':ii;!:!i!l!{:!!t,.t?{i"3d{,Ifl?fro.l!:t;t?l::1,ri3:[?1,r":e?.".tu,:ii.[i';ij;!siil]i{:;!i,'t?li"io{"Itl?fro.l!:t;t?l::t,rig:[?1,r":'t:
"."-;ii#iF::':::: ::.: :: ::i" !;:::
:: :: "::li: *:::r:;..:':.::.
.. :.:,' ""
| /l c69A3AtE€e . o t 5NtlnEtdtsto rosdv.l .Hoatl
'E'a9 a€-9a- fto
vcn. h._ -"1k**To*EfiTiii+*,,**Hry.:#:Sil*t
saqtloGt r - clutcrE
!!-oqUc! tt&ne r!}s trufibsrItr3a:C l.Etng,
coagany rdrngifj'6ag. 6r.
Ccnc,rcc,
ffi;Em/lffie (24 rrout):
Chcarr:cc (!t tt€sr):
Prod-uc!, CIu!sl.qucl eote
PtoDIrc? rIfD aglpa1sy rDDl?tptcATtw
fr:38** it ?RE!fiq{ HooD orJuE
It€€I?hr I lj,gc: O Rrac?ivlr_f; O
fifrFFF5*$*:.
9Fi*enp:_l -tdiarlveg DLvt! tc,ni!!il.ii';13,1i (er+i crs-iiil
iEi6i i3i:ii88 '
clQssllIt Pof.nnlrgl lcErtr8
!{witlcn
6rqrror rr - ooporrrr*,*'ffii-Iirff;:"*.H"r*:
Hisi.li'tHT6clc$r, c^s lFrntscr r
vrlryl AotrASE
rclIA&DD?SDI
r12-!4-3
r0E -05-{
0.33
0.03
St#ii'lfl? $ril#*':g"'i.:::i,fi !H,,$ti,i"*ltso3i;.".gIettot rrt - trEltD rDlmlrrcaqtor
l!'aYF .
i3ir,ffi!5?ffFiff ilg*iol,# $:;"i3 $:?€ffr it l;Tls".,EAs,
ffi Ifi |trffi $$:irHS*T:il r
t iii'ft fflTr:"iF.itrini.lis*r
iliiSf$rffiill.i,".
ffilFry*
lfod-flallrrrblo . slipp.ry in rh! [,at dlase _
lfsf,tAStQt:
iif:at- tlrlduBl via),.l aecEace oonoElcr iurdl fonnatd.hlde (sce SccEloo
$tli-1d.Eii3ll*F:Sjriil*#:s!g.:.o,cv,,cdccl.eFiEusc_- _ -- __ ---__--_ _ _ _--;--:--:-:-:::::::T-!I!!!:-_---
_-
nay
--- ilfqkU.n rnr,ernatrtruATBRr.N, s.e.FETy nCie-HnEET
IEBB litrl'T'3ffi8* rt PRElrrw !{ooD or'eE
UtEt'il.3l*"" 8t1g{i'Prg.. runbcr3 1'
13t'5i3iIEid.ltl;3?: ".:t,3#'ffipl;li,!1. i= l.*' re'! : r :rs !ro:n
Itr9B8TIOF:
Ifi"H' $oc"lfiffi$" l?,1otltoi"333t'9. 35 . pff.ii.E. 3i., dr I :rk or
sx;lt r
fii91"$tt"ot'"E8tgg$d. ill3rf;Tl# :
8I3i.*.. .ry 6!uie nodcraie eyr rrr:rac:o:,t.
il:H.?!.i$?l5lTr accRAvrrED Ey Bx?osunE:
Stcllq tlr . rrlgt rD X3rsun8s
lNGllttOI!
$i"r!:i$*ilHiii:l
StrlI r
3i'3"11i3.!:n trtd rateF' ocrtacc
ETE:
Hl$.if tlf.*T!S.lld.f ililrlilh
!f;Ii:.'S8fi i;3 :Yi.o[gl]iB;.H16 FprcitieIung't tnry Ctuta
can caUg! irriCa: j.c;.
e phyridtan if 1r!:caston devclopS
I
p:.nty ol rarer !c: as leasE 15
iffiltlti!"ir'.I|.,&I?l,ara-iingii
Sr.Dforivc Range ,
ffiTISTIffi,FS;dr t cd.
eia*o3| HgFllgi i593#,""n pa rc*arJd durrns coribuscion.
trg1.lrr, rntL'naeitrtcr,lERxArr serEri pCil-Egser
EEOND I! Pnn{l3tt
"ooD
6r.?rR I.ilffi$=TtgEaoNb r! pnB{I3il
"ooD ollrE
lcr !s ti,bar a/).taceri lrtrrb.illlEo 3IILfidsG :
a/25/9s
3rr.le7
i:lf lffid*ffiB*5.i;* Eelr.cc:rraur.d rcaEhrng a:tparatu! .sEllclt 1'l - rcl|:tDEtEIL tlLErgt s
ffit*Hf.tlSglm:'"o dihc :hr apilr.
*rBSOaCy htlsuREs:No!. r.tul!!d -
slerrcr vrr - ErF&Itfc r s"oR c!
or qproqd lDrosblncprod::et,/!.DaorbrRtdrl'tg, SctllDa cg
and $|!D
N/cst
l,/.rE
C -30 DPM
agrluo*O aad Bronptly
rau8e -
contrlsa: tr .rgilcd,
SEBI/
Pro:tBcuogt
osltA glts! ost{a PEL
N/ce: N/rsg
$./est x/e!c
2-00 P??{ 0.?5 PPU
oc PPI!
SSORrO!rEtrP trrinr !rm:iao.s:ot. r! teqnrr--Errr bcrseen 50 F and 90
*lSHtSInl'lISt3; chir.&ur,
{.
t
oarro ^*r^rl/""r.o'!,rlr.DenoEro ' oo DFt
N/ut
EDSIIEEA0E oortncLtr
fi li,'ilF,.TH!3: ;i"l8T*,!i,Hall. i"
Q4llBtril'*i*lii !!:Iiig,"i,E.:' ltis
N/
16
N/
r?loarl srtrrosure liu::r -
t any cnoflcy t:lofar.ahould br equippcd vi ch
il8ffjiift3$liEi.:*""
tri$TF!ffiTI$i
*H*#h;#?.qi,:TT:*
- tlr$rq rnrernaurtrrrArERrAL srseri oiii-b:EEsr
ss ffi&?tIEB8* rr pRE'r(N $ooD cr,(F
itit'S*3Y".' 85i3E?'Pag. tturgcr r i'
En PnoElctloatt
;$8"!tt$$F53&1.?"""v ev€ proE€sLron t: aDl,asblng or inlsE,rng: o!
gclUr. rtaa tDperuiour cfovct.
'EO?SFTIES
conlacE can
Ft*|lr,Crr.
Cre-an
m.?tmlf6r p:or,or.g.d
tJHTro8r rr . PArEtcAt s
SD.errn:s/coter:
!;r$i,lli" (rn vaccs) ,
*iiiit'l$q..",
ftt"tfii'$ifiiltiur, ...r,
t*ffilg,,r - slrlrDrrr s
Ftteralc.ri toiynerl zlE ron :
DirprrrtSlc in rltcr
2l0.rP
Al:;* ihan n-Buryl IceEaEe
I ,09r3. ? g/I
llrgrnrtnrfr!i:'$33$1fi.i:*i:". uir.r ncc
$8!3rrGr" ro AvorD,
_lilccf{PlEcu,xFl;sErong !|:i(l| arrd baleg _
effi:tF S$Xf$I'ffi:yffi' bc :rl.ercd .urtns corqbrsEro- .Sleulo|| trl _ lorrcot€ctcr& Eroln'lto'
iirlliilil#i*ii*ii"ili#ril=Wf,'iFs$IS$Fi*tr"r;":Si:^'i6ry1q*i?sr:E
occut
ffi!#ffi;Hrffi-:HfTiffi"iffil&{trffiHFffi#iffi#ffii#tft,I!l,Ig:t qrrll -!.rr,. .(inbl
Fjr :iis*il:elii*iltrll! sllhilgi.{riiftth:ffi i"ffqi$q+:r:ild=:ir qt_ot_viryl
1t no rv:iineC-oE-f,d&"ifu:iX"EB$rEl$l
l$li.lli.Hi|.TiA'l"i:#.;i"::i. iBL T3. l3ir3i.Aons a, eoodglCtlil ttr - lCOr.oOtcAL nfrollqr?tor
Th.r! loErrrlatloa hr, *a
"a."n Ecr?ad !3r grvrronnor.lat effacr!.sKrlqr rlII - DrSDoslL coFsrDn rrors
lraB )lsFgrr&:
iilBS'iiadt":Ii"r3fiHglg!?r ceilDrv rich alr epprrc.bla rc<telar,
eOlnr &188 Drs?o3rr, r
!(8!S lri! | TtTtlOotD!5DS FufDlf : 5006v. 100 $sot
HSD9 DltitP.ge trurbar:
If}TEBIAIJ SAFETY DATA SHEET
r*nHin Interaat,iotr
rr ERP{:fll l{coD GLua
96
1
sl2sl
01139
5
Ol tt nbcrU trck grouEtll Cl.rt
ffi/lftA.chae
Sh:,lt?tng "*. *rr=r._ aoo,ShlgDtng llr|r)!
DtlDoa8l _og Bh19 conlai{|sr ahcutd conp l_? '{iEh al1 appli.cab}e federal,3!rtc lad local lrgJiaclons.
Slgrlo|t lr9 - TltftPoRr rrpolln'3rots
;"3ff llf, i ig. :i.13 [.iBt'EFf"rllr:f 'tBi3g,i{iff ' D I' a5' eooE Bc:
stcllolt xlr . ta60tATeR" rlt?ollMon
sllr tttlMl sEC?toc r13:taxic ch6j'€el a rubreor Eo rhc13 qt Eh. Bq.rSltgy ?l arnriDg andanal o: ao CIR- 3?2-:
thrt producr c€ntr:.:ra :lle loll,osi,ncrlDoft Ing tttctrir6itrnEs o! 8€cElon IeoirrDlEy lltbt Eo Er6it Ace o! 1985Cf8 luibat gbanicrl Nlarltt-3a-6 g,rco& tm,iPnr0l.0l-. vtnltL rCiltft10.00-0 FORITILDBIIYDB
-Prot 55 (ctBonooDsi
_ .. _IrRnlfB r Thlr pro(h.tcr ccnte:n3sr-llolntt go eauta ca$gla -qlt fftSer Clrqlt e.l Xar€30-00-0 FoprAtroeryis
llllllriuAfle:q9.cflt lrrlrrdeur sgfirporrgnts rcTrrr:d to be lirted-l_atrofldrbd.l fsrarl6iF.lrdc t 3e : 60: s!a!- rlroqrf cc'r[)on!4r t rccnr llad to De l,,at.d aEgo:ynnyr ro.EaEc alrulr ion Jl3{0t-t3-tI tolrrtnyl
[l[ JB^3Blcpgllrr+rlyf lgatalc arJlrlrn ttjtoB-9t-0; naE.E .ri32-].g-5; alurlt nrgFlOliO! 77!l-13 - 6 ; DolyvlByl eleoho1 .25213-2{-! ; n-nrE}rylolacrylanidr9Zr-{2-5
slcrrol wl - oasll Dr?ffiatror
r5ltlttOF lOf{lBYr
I|SDS ratrlr.C Co lollor 15 srIcrlon for .:.
DtscttDtEt:Itlil. Btr lffor .tagn ana rcqgoncndrElo:rt g.E icrch h€reln areP?c14!g EO De lccurrg! ar Ef Eho-6r!r hcrao!, lranti:n r.lcBEr.Elonll
$i: i,lt"'!iiTlx* i iTli'll"3=,:Il"i3:, -i:!Bd:"p.. r rb.ro Eo a'd
NOI\-/A
riTANglr HlarRDoSs ('sEE Ncrn;NOr r4Z.
90xEs .IDHESrv8s lier
t0.330-0!
0.0E
! chenBoal ;(r.lJr. to the lgrte ctl
6t . 01t or fto:er
t0-05
!t or norc:afcohol 25213-2{.5
Lade P.€rr
&- s-cl7 _
(r* h{-l S. *fo Cx,c* F. O
Uheerrnr',or(^rm?:S g/t/fO
ee**crg F,ce CCoScg
{^o C^r"c;tb(fs - 6gEll(o ofrIz A/u
Wey iSst6 - uL ueub rl4^1. ?zusew,a,sS
-GnP. Q-ror.l rb eer cpa*l
Oaou^rg F4L fue* Sot*rzro^l
06/30/57 08:02 Aszo 188 0285 Ntcc0G [too1 _
Applicrlior#
JobAddrcg:
I*grIIlccr:
Ovur:
MdliDslhorft
ElcrdorConErdn
MdnEAd&s$,
Ph@#:
NOIICS
I !!rtf crt6t ttr! I hry. rt.d 6d EtlEd ttlf
+pLdio triholrlbtorE b3 tur |trd G6tcr Al
ncriibor d tM Ed o.6nc.. lpvtoh! tL t/F o(
rut ull b! c@@ d! ghtbfaF e lsth c not
Tte frutbf sf r ncuft tlocs uot ptrc o Siea rtt dY
to vLb o( EGd fu porddo dq otb1rb q locrl
hrr rEtdrtia8 Goarrrcdil ot tb pcrfrrc ot
e(Eltldan
rrgt (P&)
$t!.![gofor|!!f (b)
dbqe'n
Pcmit#
W
Derrau:r c ftdtlt el:t:br. crcrlrtorr uovbg rrlkt
Upo ratf bsb@ $t0,(m.00 sfvdudoo . 350.00
O'tct50,000,lll of vrnndoa - SlSlLltl pbr !600 for .
crrh S1,000.O ctrdo ttsuf onr t50,000.00
Dubrriatt cl Ffunt rrdahca &nbn
Up b rd btttdrt t211,000.00 dvdudoo - 125O00
Or:r tl4000$ of vrludo - $ltG00 dur g.OO Ot
cad tL00.S ortndos 6:trof orr $04000,00
MArOlLAI,',rmAnOqFIlEqi
Fe &tn{c rludic$Jt b E rdffi b T&la 3-A of
tu UnrelnA&Urretlvc Cods cTGleXo l-A dtbs
UuifodBuildhgCoda
VALUATTON #/oo, zqt.td
,RMIT APPLICATION
CluofWotlc
T6lFcr Iht Prid ncc.tpt #
Frodbr Apprw.d Dt:
'?'/-
Ptar Rntltt ADProYd DY:
Ebr.iDE phl rwhr lld lrtd irltocdolr rll br cmdwtcd by tte Nortvcrt Coloredo Couttdl of
Govcmnrog. nrlr rilt bc totrrrdcd to I{WCCOG tor rwlcw rad epprwal Scteduh |ltPcdlonr Dy
contrdlg tbc NTyCCOG Elrrrior brprctor rt (90) 45gfr95 r l0& Pleesr l!*c c[rc&s Pryrbb to
!{wcgoc.
,l e7
JFN 2l7 '97 eE 4!464r'/'s EA&r&?FGE.@,
PlnY-13-199? 17t@6 P.92/95
vtul, (l,torilCt(,
[)sl!<r. Crtonl(i(J
Et\8irrcFr.i, hc.
It has been brought to ou: attetrtion that a pockct of unsuirabre bcaring soit hqs bcencncounrered berween grids F'2. and. 9 ato.rg ur,id $e_ z. rn" rooiing f;reen re designedbased on 2000 psF bcarlB to bc 9L6" wiai'* ir'-o'ae.p *itu 1iy- ii* rro> oolongitudinal and fA6 at t'-0" raterar confirm rdittrlhe ,oit" *g.*.r, ;;;;** necessaryto achieve the 2000 pSF
-bca*ng capacity and itre limits of thJrmr"ilrrc-*ir. The (4)_#6 rongitudinal in thc +ooo psF s'-ir" *ia" rodting strall splice a minimum teDgrh of 4,_0,into the 9'-6" wide portion of rhe footing.
If you have any questions or cornrngnts, pleasc call.
Very truly yours,
MONROE & NEWELL ENCINEERS, N.IC.
-A4 2/ q,)"--.^_---__.
Scon M. Wasson
Engineer
Copy: Scot b*ry, Shaw Constuction
' l'.O. tsox 1597 . svou. Qr:lorartr.r Sf 6ZO . (g7fr) 9.19-7106 . F.\X (970) 91e_.195.'|
-J-('{l
May 13, 1997
Zefucn and Associates, Inc.
POBox 1976
Avon, CO 81620
Athr: Mr. Tirn Losa
Re; Lodgc at Vail (M&N #ZZg5)
Gentlemen:
tir 3f nChr'rrrrl t{,){d . Surte r0.i
May 9,1997
ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES
Timothy losa
plan review partial list of items to be addressed Intemational wing
Tim:
l. DRB approval required (chimney, and windows west side)(sound screen cooling tower)
2.Tc}issues: core and shell complete,exits complete and maintained,fre sprinkler and
fire alarm lfi)%
3. Ratcd door vencer as per 601.5.5 of the 1994 UBC'
4. No occupancy seperation between kitche and dining room required'
5. storage area between the kitchen and dining room occupancy seperation is required'
6. Non com lumber can not be used .
?. Service clevator level 100 & l0l smoke doors are requircd'
8. Wood sleepers level 136 can not be used must be non-combustible constnrction'
Sincerely
Town of Vail
Chuck Feldmann
Building Inspector
Mike Mcgee
Fire Marshal
o
"o/*--
h; Z<
4"/ tf74
f-?-? 7
o
6"n-2,
'
-A-r: /./t4 Av s t\-v
-
'.:: --*r--
Z E H R E N.
AND ASSOCIATES, IN..,
ARCHITECTURE. PLANNINC' INTERIORS
Timothy R. Losa
P.O. Box 1976 . Avon, Colorado 81620
(3og) 949-02s7 . FAX (303) 949-1080
1
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;J
?a Z E H R PN
-- AND ASSocrATEs, rNC.
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Date: Friday, May 02, 1997 From: Tim Losa
To: Chris Squadra Project: International Wing
Compony: ARC Project No: 94889.00
Fax Number: 479-9821 No. of Pages: 4
Re: Meeting Agenda - T.O.V. Copies To: See Below
Chris:
Enclosed is a list of items that I would like to cover in this aftemoons meeting. If anyone has any additional
concerns, please call me at the trailer after 2:00 pm. The number is 479-6447.
Tim Losa
Project Manager
cc: Peter Monroe, MN (attendance not required at TOV meeting)
John Volponi, LV (attendance not required)
Stan Humphies, YEI (attendance required)
Steve Boyd, YEI (attendance not required)
Scot Lowry, SCI (attendance required)
Architecture.Planning.lnteriors.Landscape Architecturc
P.O. Box 1976 Avon. Colorado 81620 (970) 949-0257 Fax (970) 949-1080
The above is considered correct unless responsc to the contrary is received within 7 days fiorn the above date.
S :\PROJADMN\94889\FA X ESUV960823.TRL
Town of Vail - Permit-Meetins Issues
The Lodge at Vail - International Wing
April9, 1997
Code Adoption
. Current codes
o Adoption of 1997 UBC
TCO - Food Storage AreaVHousekeeping/ Mechanicalo 20 June 1997
o Sprinkler Shop Drawing Scheduler Smoke Detection/Alarm Shop Drawing Schedule
TCO - Floors I l6'-1". 125'-9". 136'-0"r 15 November 1997r FFE move-inr GWB & I hour rating entire structuree Pull stationsr Permanent heads at all areas ofTCO. Sprinkler system (heat detection) fully operationalr Temporary 120v. at construction areas bagged during dayo Fire watch ifnecessary at construction areaso Construction areas locked off (egress hardware) from TCO areas
Elevator Shop Drawings. Guest elevator primary and secondary recall floorso Service elevator primary and secondary elevator recall
ll
Rated Door Assemblv /
. Ftated assembly with %" thick veneer stiles and railso Assembly details for town approval ?r Sprinkler heads each side?
East E levationirJ0'lf
'. e ' Non-combustible wood framing vs. light gauge stqelr Section 705 UBC
(, ul
p')
Document Revisionso Cl.l - C3.l no changer Ll - Landscape Demolition addedc L2 - Site Materials/Layout
o Columns removed - stone sigr wall added as condition of permit A.K.o Stone column removed discussed with A.K. by phonec L3-L7 no changesr D2.l - D2.4 Demolition Plansr Changes only to reflect scope ofFall construction. Interior demolition of housekeeping and food storage areaso A2.l - Level 100-0 Floor Plan. Stair I 14 configuration, typical all levels
. Kitchen re-design
. structuralrequirements
o mechanicalrequirements
/l
t./ 5J
jsgct
ftionz.c 0L
exception 2.4
. Partition storase
. struc4qal-rsquirementsj fire separation UBC 301o Banquet storage
0
)
t:
i,1.
.t
,.\,"r",lu' t
P
J, \-'
. access to mechanical space aboveo doors dlr_eglly-to ballroomr. fire separation UBC 301 exception 2.4o Elevator mechanical room locationr Storage/Receivingr complete demolition and expansion. new refiigeration
o health department requirementso egress from existing stairwell relocated
Housekeeping
r new area at basement levelr stair to revised lower level
MechanicayElectrical relocation
o primary electrical shutoffo new transformer location. structuralrevisionssteeVcmu,foundations/basement level
Accessible lift relocation
Stair redesien at 129o AV/Janitor closet 106 re-desisn
A2.3 - Level I l6'-1" Plan
. Structural wall location at grid 1.4o Stairre-configuration
M.4 -l*vel125'-9" Planr Stair reconfiguration
A2.5 - tevel 136'-0" Plano Stairre-configuratiory{eaptqrJ$resQ. Ftoor construition UBc 60il5 .l:lot.z:.6 J ljo
A2.6 no changes
42.7 - A2.ll see changes listed above - 7r" plans
42.12 - additional %" sheet - see A2.l above
A3.l-A3.3 no changes
A3.4 West Elevationo Mechanical exhaust change at chimney
A3.5 Loading Area Elevations/Section. Removal ofdoors from south elevationo Stone on exterior elevation. Steel frame structure
r Basement level. Cooling Tower in place of chiller
A4.l- Building Section. concrete elevator shaft cap/steel framing detail at vent
A4.2 - Building Section
r Stair configuration - see plan
44.3 - A4.4 - no changes
A5.l - A5.2 - no changes
Sl - Foundation Plan
r Footirrg redt'sign at kilchen area
r Footing rcdcsign at loading dock area
52 - kvel I
r Stcel redcsigr at loading dock area
a
a
o
a
a
o
a
ll
a
a
. Steel roofredesign at level I. Stair opening redesigne 53 - Level3r Roofredesign at loading dock arear Stair opening re{esignr Tie backs at deck moment connectionso 54 - Level 4. Moment connections at structure cantitevere 55 - Roof Framing. Light gauge substitution at various membersr 56 - Arlberg
o no changesr S7- Sl0 - Details
r Various revisions and additional details
MEETING REQUESTED BY ARC AT ALTITUDE SPORTS BAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING MEETINGAT TOWN OF VAIL. ALL CONST LTAI\ITS ARE REQLTIRED TO ATTEI.ID. (r AtA suppOseo TO cO ToMOAB ALSO, SO STOP YOT.'R BELLY-ACHING)
NRY-85-199? t7| 13 P.42/93
Monroe t"*"u
Eqgtnocrs, Inc.
q{EOIGD BY
s
?;:,,.:*f?
-ri*:tr
-ii
i
'
NnY-e5-
n
^
7r'\{r.t\VY
Monroe e. ftvreu
L997 L?tL4
Elginccrs, Inc,
,*.J-cf,:F,; * \1.-HLml;srqr-
CIIIE:IGO BY OAIE
-
ria\Ytl
6"mnx
E (ET
WALL
Ek4
Brn \v
epT L*2-FSsIc>
IAlnA
tr Fr-
,.Tq+E$T
t
o
The Lodge at Vail
T.dailm Dur.tbo sdrrt ,End Dctvrrtcr
Mobilizallon 6.00 d ouAuorg6 l4rAuqrg€2 Trailers a0'
Slle Fenclnq end Barlcade!5.00 d 08rAuqr96 1{Auqr9€1 Truck 30'
Dlsconnect Utllttle3 5.00 d 08rAuqi95 1{Auq/0e
Demolitlon 5.00 d 16rAuqr96 21fAusr95 Tlack Ho€ ,O enddumDs trlos
Ercavellon 10.00 d 2AAud96 05rSe0196 Track hoe 3000vds 200 trucls
3[a t SlHcr 10.00 d oc,s.o,80 1grs.ono Bacl Ho. Tmck.l DcllvGrlr.
Arlbcrg Restaurant 59.00 d 2AAUoiSi 1'lrNovrgG
Derno Erlstlnq Structure 3.00 d 2ZAuql96 26/Audo€Track Hoe l0 Truckg
Ercevatlr Foundatlon 2.00 d 27lAttdg0 28rAuqrS6
UnCerground t tlllties 3.00 d 29rAuq/90 03/Sepr90
Footings 2.00 d lxrseptg6 0SrSeprsG 4 Concretc Trucks, Pump
Foundatlon /t.00 d 08,seDr96 11rseor96 6 Concrete Trucks, PumD
Backlill 2.00 d IZSeD/96 13rseor98 Back Hoe ,5 enddlmps
sog 2.00 d 16rSeD€6 17rsed96 6 Concreto Trucks, Purnp
Steel 3.00 d 18rSeDr96 zorsen l€3 30' Trailers. crane
Root t00d 2$f.Dr96 2',8cor36 I 30'Tnflrr
Ertqdor Framlng 6.00 d 23,sep{g6 27rSeprg6 1 30' tTaller
Gl.ss 7.00 d 30rSeD/g6 08tGr98 2 Deliveriel
Erfsrbr Fhlrh 400 d 08to.rt96 lSrocttlt I tldlvrrv
lr cdor Frlrllnq 3.00 d 23rSeDr96 2srseprg€1 30' Trailer
Mechanlcal, Elec{rlcal Rouqh In3 5.00 d 26tSed96 0zroct/g€4 Dellverier
lnsulatlon 2.00 d 0UOCU96 {lUOcug6 2 Dclivedcs
She€t Rock 5.00 d o7roct s6 11/OcU90 3 30' Tr.llerc
Prln|e 1.00 d 2'ltoc1r96 2lroct tG I O,ellvery
Tape and Finish 6.00 d 14rOcU96 18tOcU90 'l Dellverv
lr erior Trim 3.00 d 2AO&96 2,f1ffir96 2 Dellvcrieg
Final MechanicaU Elec:trlcal 3.00 d 25rOcU96 2groctt90 2 Dellverles
Floor Coverlnqc 3.00 d torocu96 01rNovr96 2 Deliveries
Final Palnt 3.00 d oilNov/96 '06rNovr90 1 Oclive.ies
Final Clc.n 2.00 d 0zrNov/96 {l8rl{ovr98
furdl 3.00 d l2lltovjgt l4JttldrrSa
Underpinninq 16.00 d 06rseprg6 2615ed95 2 Trucks l0 Concrete, Pump
FlnrlGrdCA.cm[2.00 d 0!roct/90 ot ()ctnt 20 9rrvcl ?rrrlr
Footinq8 end pad3 5.00 d 20/Sep/96 26rsepr98 25 Concrete Tauchs. Pump
FanHtGrdnlnr 2.00 d 2Trscnlt8 torscDrL !Enddm
Under Slab t tllltles 10.00 d ogroct t6 22,Gr96 2 Deliverieg
Precast 31.00 d 27rSepr96 08rNovr96 Crane
First floor wall6 and columns and b€a '1.00 d 27tSeD/96 0ZOcUlro 10 30-60'Trailers
Level 2 Deck Precast 4.00 d 03r@r96 08rOcU9€10 30-60' Trallert
Level2 walls and colurnnc and beams 4.00 d ogroct 96 1aroclrg0 10 30.60'TrrllerB
Level 2 StQcl Precalt 1.00 d 16rOcU96 1sroctlg6 10 30S0' Trallers
Level 3 deck Ptecast /3,00 d t6roct/96 Zlloctlg8 l0 3040'Trallers
Level 3 walls, columna. b€ams 4,00 d 2AOcw6 2S,oCU96 10 30€0' Traller3
Level 3 Steel Precad 1.00 d 28roct 96 z8roct !10 10 3040' Trellerg
Level 4 Deck Prec.d 4.00 d 2grocu9€01rl,ovrg8 10 30$0' Trallers
Level 4 walls , columns. beems 4.00 d &UNovr96 07rNov/96 10 30-60' Tlallers
Level 4 Steel Precast 1.00 d 08rNovl96 08rNovr96 10 30-60'Trallers
Roof Steel and framinq 15.00 d 12rNovrg€03rDec/gc 10 Trucks, Cranc
soc t.00 d zsroct 96 2efi)dlt 15 GrsC.26 Co|E!.t!. P|nD
Rough Ins 19.q' d 2ZGtg6 'l8rl{ovr96 5 Deliveries
Level 2 Oeck Rouqh Ins 5.00 d 2Zoct/g6 28tocug6 5 Dellverles
Level 3 Deck Rouah lns t.00 d 0/t Nov/96 08rNovrg6 5 Oellveries
Level il Deck Rouoh ln3 5.00 d 12,Novr96 18rNovr96 6 D.llveriea
Toppinq Slabg 17.00 d Zgrocug6 ?1rNovr96
Level2 Topplnq Slab 3.0O d 29rGJ96 3lroctl!16 16 Concrete Trucks, Pump
Level 3 TopDinq Slab 3.00 d 1ZNovr96 t'gNovrg6 12 Concrete Trucks, PumD
Level 4 Toppino Slab 3.00 d 1grl'lovlg6 21rNovr96 10 Concrete Trucks. Pump
Exterlor Metal Framlns 34.00 d 01rNov/98 20rD,ed98
Level 1 Exterlor Fr.mlno 5.00 d 01rNovr96 0ZNov190 2 Deliverie.
Level 2 Exterior Franilnq 10.00 d l6rNov/96 29rNovrg8 2 Dellverier
Level 3 Exterior Framlnq 10.00 d 22lNov/96 06rOectg6 2 Dellveries
Level 4 Erterlor Franrlno 10.00 d 0grDecrg6 20rD€cr98 2 llellverie3
Roof 17.00 d 0ZDcc/g0 2/UDec196
oo
Pint d: 2uAprr08
Prgc !
Town of Vril
CFFICEOOPY
EtlEE
ZEHREN
AND ASSOCIATE INC-
Anclfi8crurc . AJ$NING
tNrBtofis.l NIxc tE AxclllTEc.turE
P'o. 0q t976 ArqL C.alor& c1620
6{B) 9a9{t257 FAI('03} 949-1oEO
FROJEcT Nrf1E, PROJECT t'l@$1049!Dl
TI{E ARLtsERG RE9T4SBANT
TI-]E LODGE AT VAIL
DRAIIJII€ 1IILE,
NORTI-.I EL EVAT ION/gECT ION
3c,lJ.;E.v". t',-O" OArECf26t%
FI{A3E.
@
6r{EEt,
9K-l
OF
s$v^tro
sf;lF qfi N$si -nl- ql: rJ-(ur-l g x
s=
n
,,,\
,/\
/\
/\
-P
q
ma.F,/T\ rtly'ffiYn;' /J1-i- \\i Iq\r
-t
9
o
PgASE:
5HEE I'
o
q
N
Y
\,
Rp
FO7O67'
-$E<r,qlJ..1
rdtrf-risr
q
N
rrl
t\,
dJ
ZEHREN
AND ASSOCIATES, INC'
AROIIIECTU RE . PI.{NNINO
INTER,IORS . LANDSCAPE MCH]TECruRI
P,O. 8ox 1976 A\@n, Colordo !1620
p7o) 9494257 fAX {970)949J060
PROJECT I"{AI1E:
the Lodge aL vatl
7he Arlberg reoLauranr
oRAuJlt€ lllLE,
Entrq Foqer Plan
noy2.la, . t,_@a
ZEHREN
AND ASSOCIATES, lNC.
ARCH]TECruRE. PL\NNING
INTIRIORS. IANOSCAPE ARC1IITECIURE
P,O, Bq 1975 Awn, Color.do !1620
t970r 919.0257 FAX (970) 949J oEO
FROJECT NAIIE!
the Lodge al vatl
'lhe Arlberg reetaurant
DRAllJltlG lllLE3
Entru Fouer - East ElevaLlonEntrq Foqer '
g,6aYgYt ' . t-d DATE,6/268b
FrlA9Er
e-L/ 2pf\-J
({l ,,
IL\
VFUOulFo(',3u-lrrozo
JlL/
L*r-\'$^
\l1-T-
'..\ti
-,J
HF.)
Oip-
AK
JIrLl
TYPICAL t\Rr I
4zl2 l-
BELOIIJI +F
EXl9Tt{6 ROOF
ZEHREN
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
^nCHTECIURE.
PTANNING . INTEruOIS
?.o. Bo( 1976 A\qr, Color.do 61620
(303) 9,19-057 FAX BO3) 949-160
PROJECT NAIIE: FROJECT NO.g$9Ol
the Lodge at vait
the Arlberg Restaurant
DRA/II6 TITLE:
Faqer Roof Plan*at\la"a'-o" oalE.anat%
Pl.lA9E,
co
6l-IEET'
t1L/ ,9t\-(2
G