HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5C LOT B LAZIER ARCADE AKA WALL STREET BUILDING BUILDING DRB PEC LEGALo
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
I
Date 7- Z7-<l'l
t,l
Project uamc: W&tt- SfPteT Butt-U Nc,-
BuildingNamc:
owner, Atldress andphone: BoA f-ftZey-
ArchitecUContact, Address and Phonc:
Lcgal Description; Lot Block 5C Subdivision Vnp V,.rrkot 11 Zone District GT.
Project Street Address:
Comments:
,--_-_--..\€eerd l6l4ff4g!ior1),
Motion by:Vote:
Seconded bv:
tr APProval
D Disapproval
oate, 7-72* 7'7 DRBFeepre-pai<l
I Qucstions? cott tn. tnning staff at 4'79'2128
APPI,ICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
DI]SCRIPTION OF 1'IIE REQUEST: }\I'SOf tlrrof,bJ -
AiJNERAL INTOBMAITON
'l his application is lirr any projcct rcqtriring Dcsign Rcvicw approval. Any projcct rcquiring dcsign rcvicw must
rcccivc l)csign Rcvrcw approval prior to sLrhnritting rbr a buiiiing pcrrnit, For spccific intbnnalion' scc thc submittal
rcquircnrclts for (hc particr.rlar approval lhat is rcqucstcd. Thc aipiication cannot bc acccptcd until all thc rcquircd
intirrnration is submittctl, Thc, piolcct tley also nced to bc '"uit'uttl by thc -l'orvn Cotrncil ancl/or thc Planning arrd
Environrncntal Courrnission. Dcsign Rcviclv tloard approval cxpircs onc year aftcr linal approval unlcss a
buil<ling pcrmit is issucd and constructi()n is startcd'
TOl'/fN OF VAIL
t].
('.
r)
l;
LOCAI lON OF PROPOSAT-: LO]':_- BI-OCK: +
PHYSICAL. ADDRESS: l^l4ll t{-
(Contact Eaglc Co. Asscssor Officc at 970-328-tt640 for parccl ll)
ZONINC:
--&E--
NAMII OI; OWNER(S):
MAII-INCi ADDITESS:
OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
ci,
I I.
NANl E, Of, APi'LI('AN'I':
,IYPE OF I{EVIF]W ANI) FI.]E:
D Nclv Construclion - $200 Constmction of a ncw building'
tl Addition -
SMinor Altcrafion -
$50 lnclurics iury addition whcrc squarc lootagc is addcd to any fcsidcntial or
cotntncrcial building.
$20 Inch.rdcs rrrinor clrangcs to buildings and sitc irnprovcnrctrts, sttch as,
rcrooting. painting, windorv additions. landscaping, fbnccs and rctaining
rvalls. ctc.
MAfLINCADPRESS: YWJ ,+-;- I,,____g_rt_ ._ PHoNE:
DRB tccs arc to bc paid at thc tinrc of subnrittal. Latcr. whcn applying for a btrilding pennit' please idcntify
thc accuratc valuation of thc projcct. ThcTown ol'Vail rvill adjust the fcc according to thc project valuation
P|-EASE SUBMIl'TI{IS APPLICATION,, ALL SUBMTTTAL REQUIREMEN'I'S AND THE FEE TO THB
I,EPARTI\{EN'I' OF COMMTJNITY DBVEI,OPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD'
VAII,, COLORADO 81657.
PARCEL #:
* t c. dL' r,- /A-'-p /iL, lL tJt;fa flaS
o
LIST OF PROPOSED MATERIALS
I
BUILDING MATERIALS:TYPE OF MATERIAL:COLOR:*
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Dcck Rails
Flucs
Flashings
Chimncys
Trash Enclosurcs
Cr!:cnhouscs
Rctaining Walls
Exterior Lightiug++
Othcr
* Please specifi the manufachrrer's color, number and attach a small color chip
*i All extsrior lighting must meet thc Town's Lighting Ordinancc | 8.54.050(J). If exterior lighting is proposed,
please indicate th. nunlb". of fixturcs and locations on a scparatc lighting plan.
f
de$ifV each fixture type and provide
ih. h.ight
"boue
grade, lumcns output, lutninous area, and attach a cut shect ofthe lighting fixtures'
Updatcd 6/9?
Botanical Namc
l'"osBn lmlnsclpnrc O
Common Namc Ouantity Sizc*
PROPOSED TREES
AND SHRUBS:
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED:
*Mininrum rcquircmcnts for landscaping: dcciduotls trccs - 2 inch calipcr
conifcrous trccs - 6 fcct in height
shrubs - 5 gallons
Typc Squarc Footagc
CROUND COVER
SOD
SEED
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
OTmR LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fcnccs, swimming pools, ctc.) Plcase specify' Indicate top and
bottom elevations of rctaining walls. Maximum height of walls within thc llont setback is 3 fect. Maximum height of
walls clscwherc on thc propcrty is 6 fect.
Updated619T
This form is to vcrifu scrvicc availability and location for ncw conshuction and should bc uscd in conjunction
with prcparing your utility plan and schcduling installations. Thc location and availability of utilitics, whcther
tncy 6c main trunk lines or proposcd lincs, must be approvcd and vcrificd by thc following utititics for thc
acconrpanying sitc Plan.
r rrrLrroocATION V ERJFICATION
Authorizcd Signaturc Date
U.S. Wcst Communications
I -ti00-922-l987
468-6860 or 949-4530
Public Servicc Cornpany
949-5781
Gary Hall
Holy Cross Elcctric Assoc.
949-5892
Tcd Husky/John Boyd
T.c.t.
949-5530
Floyd Salazar
Eaglc Rivcr Watcr
& Sanitation District *
476-7480
Frcd Haslcc
* plcasc bring a sitc plan, floor plan, and clcvations whcn obtaining Uppcr Eaglc Vallcy Water & Sanitation
signaturcs. Firc flow needs tnust bc addrcsscd.
NOTES:
l. Ifthc utility vcrification form has signaturcs from cach ofthc utility companies, and no
commcnls arc madc drrcctly on thc form, thc Town will prcsunre that thcrc arc no problems and
thc dcvclopmcnt can Procccd.
2, Ifa utility company has concems with thc proposcd conshuction, the utility rcprcsentativc shall
notc dircctly on the utility vcrification form that thcrc is a problem which nceds to bs resolved.
The issuc should thcn bc detailed in an attachcd lefter to thc Town of Vail. However, please
kecp in rnind that it is thc responsibility ofthc utility company and the applicant to resolvc
idctrtified problcms.
3. Thcsc verifications do not rclicvc the conffactor of thc rcsponsibility to obtain a Public Way
permit from thc Dcpartment of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utilit-v locations must be
obtained bcforc digging in any public right-of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A
PRE-APELICATION CONFERENCE
updated 6/97
ll.
1il.
IV.
A prc-application confcrcnce with Torvn of Vail staff is rcquircd. No application can bc acccptcd unlcss the
mantlatory prc-application mccting ha.s bccn complctcd. !t is thc applicant's rcsponsibility to schcdulc this
mccting by calling 970-479-2128.
TIME REOUIREMENTS
Thc Dcsign Rcvicrv Board rnccts orr thc lst and 3rd Wcdncsdays of cach nronth. A complctc application
fofln and all accompanying nratcrial must be acccptcd hy thc Comnrunity Dcvclopment Dcpartmcnt a
nrinimum of thrccandahalf (3 li2) weeks prior to thc datc of thc DRB public hcaring.
REVIEW CRITERIA
your proposal will bc rcvicwctl for comptiance rvith thc Dcsign Guidelincs as set forth in Soction l8'54 of thc
Municipal Codc.
NOTE TO ALL APPLICANTS:
A. Ifa propcrty is located in a rnapped hazard arca (i.c. snow avalanchc, rockfall, floodplain, dcbris
flow, wctland, ctc). a hazard study must bc submittcd and the owncr must sigrl an affrdavit
rccognizing thc haz-rrd repoft prior to thc issuance ofa building pcrrnit. Applicants are cncouraged
to chcck with thc planning statTprior to subrnittal of a DRB application to dcterminc thc relationship
ofthe propcrty to all nrappcd hazards.
B. Basic Plan Shcct Fornrat. For all survcys. sitc plans, landscapc plans and othcr sitc improvenrents
plans, all of thc fbllowing must bc shown.
L Plan shcct sizc must bc 24"x 36. For largc projccts, largcr plan sizc ntay hc allowcd.
2. Scalc. Thc ntininturu scalc is l"=20'. All plans nrust bc at thc santc scalc.
3. Graphic bar scalc.
4. North arrotv.
5. Titlc block, projcct nanrc, projcct addrcss and lcgal dcscription'
6. Indication of plan prcparcr. addrcss and phone numbcr.
'7. Datcs of original plan preparation arrrl all rcvision datcs.
It. Vicinity tnap or location map at a scalc of l"=l '000' or largcr'
9. Shcct labcls and numbcrs.
l0 . A bordcr with a rninimunr lcft sidc nrargin of 1.5".
I l. Narncs ofall adjaccnt roadways.
12. Plan lcgcnd.
C. For new construction and additions, thc applicant nlust stakc and tapc thc project site to indrcate
propcrty lincs. proposcd buildings and building comers. All trees to be removcd nrust bc taped. The
applicant must clsure that staking donc during thc wintcr is not buricd by snow' All sitc tapings
and staking must bc completed prlor to the day of thc DRB mecting'
D. Applicants who fail to appcar beforc thc Design Revicw Board on their schcduled mccting date and
who havc not asked in advance that discussion on their item bc postponcd, will havc their items
removed from the DRB agenda until such tirne as the item has been republished.
E. Ifthe DRB approvcs the application with conditions or modifications, all conditions of approval
must bc resolvcd p:rior to the issuance of a building permit.
Updated 6/97
STAFF APPROVAL
Thc Administrator may rcvicw and approve Design Rcview applications, approvc with ccrtain modifications'
deny the application, or may rcfcr thc applicationlo thc Dcsigr Revicw Board for dc_cision. All staff
app.ouals a." subjcct to final approval by thc DRB. Thc following types of Dcsign Rcvicw applications may
bc staff approvcd:
A. Any application for an addition to an cxisting building that is consistcnt rvith thc architcctural design,
matcrials and colors of thc building. anrl approval hus bcen rcccivcd by an authorizcd rnember ofa
condominium association. if applicablc;
B. Any application to modify an cxisting building that docs not significantly changc thc exishng planes
ofthc building and is gcncrally consistcnt with thc architcctural dcsign. Inaterials and oolors ofthe
building, including. bJt not limited to cxterior building finish matcrials (c'g' stoncwork, siding. roof
matcrials, paint or stairl,), cxtcrior lighting. canopics or awnitlgs, fenccs..antcnnas' satcllitc dishes'
windows, itytigr,t . siding, rninor co-nrmcicial facade improvctttcnts, and othcr similar modifications;
C. Any application lbr sitc improvemcnts or rnodifications including. but not limitcd to, driveway
modifications, sitc grading, sitc walls. rcnroval or modifications to cxisting landscaping, installation
of acccssory structures or rccrcational l'acilitics.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES
A. lf this application rcquircs a scparatc rcvicw by any local, statc or Fcdcral agcncy othcr than the
'l'own of Vail, thc application fcc shall bc incrca.scd by $200.00. Exanrplcs of such rcvicw, may
includc, but arc not limitcd to: Colonrdo Dcpartnrcnt of Highway Access Pcrmits' Arrny Corps of
Enginccrs 404, ctc'
B. Thc applioant shall bc rcsponsiblc for paying iury publishing fccs which arc in cxcess of 50% of the
apptication fbc. If, at thc applicant's rcqucst, any nrattcr is postponed for hcaring. causing thc mattcr
to
-bc
rc-publishcd, thcl thc cntirc fcc for such rc-publication shatl bc paid by thc applicant'
C. Applications dccnrctl by thc Community Dcvclopnrcnt Dcpartment to have dcsign, lantl use or othcr
isiucs which may havc a significant irnpact on thc cornmunity may rcquirc rcvicw by consultants in
addition to Town staff. Should a dctcrmination bc madc by thc Town staff that an outsidc conSultant
is ncedcd, thc Conrnrunity Dcvcloprncnt Dcpartmcnt may hirc thc consultant. Thc Dcpartmcnt shall
estimatc the arnount of rnoney neccssary to pay thc consultant and this arnount shall bc forwarded to
thc 'Iown by thc applicant atitrc timc oifiling an application. Expcnses incurrcd by thc Town in
exccss of thc amoiurt forwarded by thc application shall be paid to the Towr by the applicant within
30 days of notification by thc Town. .Any cxccss funds will bc retumcd to thc applicant upon review
comPlction.
vt.
Uodated 6/97
,OWN OFVAIL
a
o
MINOR ALTBRATIONS TO THE.EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
CENERAL INFORMATION
This apptication applies to changcs made to a sitc or cxterior altcrations ofa building. Any altcration in
rvhich additional building squarc footago is addcd will requirc an "additions" application.
I. SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS
Photos or sketches which clcarly convcy the cxisting conditions.
Photos or skctchcs which gleady convcy thc proposed building or sitc alteration(s).
All rclcvant specifications for thc proposal including colors and lnatcrials to be used.
Condonriniunr Association approval (if applicablc).
Iflthc intcnt of thc proposal is not clcarly indicatcd. thc Adnrinistrator may dctcrminc that additional
nratcrials arc nccc.ssary for thc rcvicw ofthc application.
u
a
o
ot
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Category Number
Prolect Name:
Building Name:ZhLrf ,-.- 'i:7--2 t z"f 7- zz t z-7) .,..,-/ 6
Projec't Description:
Owner,Address andPhone: Kfi F. r a-t (), 4EcnnwA*L /r'p rt z'-<z-,q.- r-,, -rstuO
/h r A/^ | r:'L. :1 /6A -1c,{ 73/ - ggY{
ArchitecVContact, Address and Phone: '-.*1- g;a',*..-r a a. rL:=,'x
*r,
Legal Description: Lot
-
Block f( Subdivision Zone District ac-z-
ProjectstreetAdaress: ?2 { (J..g/ lzlze€T
Comments:
Motion by:
Board i Staff Action
Vote:
Seconded by:
D Approval
fl Disapproval
,XQtaff APProval
Condilions:
Qucstions?
t
Call thc Planning Staff at 479-21 2tt
APPLICA'I'ION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
TOWNOFVAU
GNNERAL INFORMATION
This application is firr any projcct rcquiring Dcsign Rcvicw approval. Any project requiring desigrr rcvicrv mrtst
r.cccivc Design Rcvicw approval prior to sutrmitting for a buitding permit. For spocific infomration, scc thc submittal
rcq*ircmcnts for thc particular approval that is rcqucsted. The application cannot bc acceptcd until all thc rcquired
information is subrnitted. fle piojcct may also nced to bc rcvicwcd by the Town Council and./or thc Plzurning and
Envirorrmcntal Cornmission. Design Revicrv Board approval cxpircs one ycar after tinal approYal unless a
truiltling pcrmit is issued and construction is startcd'
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST:
,r iLB.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT:
PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 2:Z '.,
C,
D.
ZONING:
NAME OF OWNER(S):
MAILING ADDRESS:
F
F.
OWNER(S)SIGNATUITE(S\ VFr' ln, s,-u,.-"t't^"''-'
NAME OF APPLICANT:
MAILING ADDRESS:
C.TYPE OF REVIEW AND FEEI
tr Ncw Construction - $200 Construction ofa ncw building.
Includcs any addition rvherc squarc footage is addcd to any residcntial or
commcrcial building.
Includcs rninor changcs to buildings and site iniprovcmcnts' such as,
rcroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping' fcnccs and retaining
walls. etc.
For any application where thc applicant wishes to meet with Dcsigrr Review
Board to detenrrine whether or not the project gencrally complics with the
design guidelincs. Thc DRB does not vote on conceptual rcvicws'
tr Addition -
XMlno. Alteration -
DRB fecs are to be paid at the timc of submitlal. Later, rvhen applying for a building pcrmit, plea-se identify
thc accuratc valuation ofthe project. The Town of Vail will adjust the fee according to the project valuation'
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, T5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD'
$s0
$20
E Conccptual ltcvicw - $0
vArL, coLORADO 81657.
updated I /97
,ln.,
LIST OF PROPOSED MATERIALS
BUILDINC MATERIALS:TYPE OF MATERIAL:COLOR:*
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Matcrials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Dcck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimncys
Trash Enclosures
Creenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting**
Other
* Plcase specify the manufacturer's color, number and attach a small color chip
** All exterior lighting must mcct thc Town's Lighting Ordinance 18.54.050(J). If cxterior lighting is proposed,
please indicate thi number offixtures and locations on a separate lighting plan. Identi$ each fixhue type and provide
the height above gradc, lumens output, luminous area, and attach a cut sheet ofthe lighting fixturcs'
:>
{t
3
4{
4
F _4.-----.- 1''-= " 3 z 4'( -,*--.,""
8rl{-ul-e/ luL' ,iJ:ub ffl] HIIDESS-cADllus REAL EST FA}{ N0, 9U03188v
Il^Btondess'Codmus Reol Estote, Inc.
/t$)
281 BRTDGE srREEr ' VA.L' coLoRADo s16s7 b r.- K
\ Rz: $a3-cr's f"r^*l
April I,199?
Town of Vail
Dept. of Cornrnunity Dcvclopment
75 South Frontagc Road
Vail, Co 81557
Dear Sirs:
Please bc advised that ttre Wall Street Builling Condominium Association fully approves
of thc instaltation of a bay window and loft window in Unit #301 of the Wall Srreet
Building as shown in a skctch prcpared by Circle Wcst Architccts darcd 8-12-94. Please
call me at 476-1450 if you have any questions.
REAL ESTATE (970) 4?6-14s0 r DENVER TOLL FREE 893'3101
RESERVATTONS r{00-222-VArL . FA)( (970) 47&3188
P, 0l
Wall St. Bldg. Condo. Assoc.
O!,nn Review Action trO"F-t
Arr, " i,'^,/o
, Address and Phone:
ArchiteCVContact, Address and Phone:t'\_--_,./
dvtt t^h ll
Legal Descriptis6; l6f _ Block
Prolect Street Address:
Comments:
0c Zone District (CZ
Board / Statf Action
Motion by:Vote:
Seconded by:
! Disapproval
d/6tut
DRBFee pre-oaiall h il#tlilq
^\ft-t^ t"/
ox", /k /?-alt/
f.t
+r
(-
--.>-
{1
$+
{\
lu
,$
"'\9
l[:=llL:-]
F_li=--lE--'
?.-=
crN!{uo'rs bP€at- '
R^rt|tuq F\all'GO
c\E,e6$ 1D /1*1LN
ffA9arA
e\-.qO hjurood 5
z'\e"wo
F/gar*,
?fhtp@^aFeu
To tr4q+t'.),tsttt\.
goF€\T:
Tiq toooo CtOr^\.
3fAueo to
^4A{aHEXltTlrrq.
f t r.rsrr rft€,
qtAb
FseT.0r@o
9 t o^rcr
U.rooo 9X1q15
Eil'f,,&J00,o€iowq
5Ea.ioll ftrpa1 fgAq td I Ll ooq-,
,
r,r',:
q\-o u
c4)nduDdl(1^9rhuq .
EtO.t^. AAFA9Ai rC.
gtr.r,r.1Aro u €1
tr.J *r! ,
vCPVl 9\ht,
/fiFfl $?q Lr$TrL .
q
I
ttl
8f.?i3"1*' -5
C?) ?4r4' Figc.rA'5 ,ri-r*-r -.. t r\rYr6, j t
>-l*rllEfca€elc.lo TlM*{a$ ErsgTlp(,-o | |qvEeN Ftez.r4. +l
l-,-ou:€ggox--Je" I
€r(Ar.rEo q(#r f__t
-r.o /h4'(at{
i:" i; 5oeA I" T
'
q "rooo9'rorpl . :21Attr'EO
fo ,rA{ctt Exofiuq.
FplT.
,vl.t€oApt
u&j-.
+
Ifl
6.2q.1+
?,+
t\,
€^\r
"R$i
S; tll
s
7|
t\l
1s
a
;
+o
d
ts
Pt$
.,
I
J0-
rt
is
3$
s*s
o
I
rt'j
$o
iiltl
.t\ 43p
i-=t
i$$
u9-,'
a
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
$UBJECTT
MqMOFAN-pUtul
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
rjdrlDecember 16,'1993
Proposed Community
greenhouse windows
Developmenl policy on GRFA relating
in all residential zone districts oartL'
This merno sgrves to iCentify Commurrity Development's policy on GRFA calculations relating
to greenhouse windovrs in all residential zona districts, Since the adoption of the amended
GRFA delinition in 1991, it has been stafl's policy lo define all windows which protrude from
the exterior lace of a building, on a residentially zoned lot, as "bay windows". Bay windows
can be very lar.ge. structuralfy framed, and extend to, or nearly to, the ground. They may add
significant masi and bulk to a building and therefore will be counted torvard the total allowable
GRFA on a site, However, cerlain types ol s6ll-6uoportinq windows' hereinafter referred lo as
'greenhouse ,,vindows". do not signiiicantly add lo ihe rnass and bulk of a building and will not
be counted torvard the total allowable GFFA on a site.
The follOwing criteria rvill be used for classifying greenhouse windows. Windows which meet
the following Oimensional requirements snati Us Considered lo be greenhouse windows and
shall not count as GRFA,
b"il4s_g_.Il t rr oo@ecessary to meet €uil_ding code
iicrr minirnum requirement was chosen because it
be cornfortably used as a window seal, and because it
greenhouse *indo* lo be used in a room with an 8'foot
ceiling height.
2. Proiection - No greenhouse window
aj,:r,stj!4ggj.e buitding. Trris disTiffi-dil6ws ior adequale relief for appearance
purposes, wrrncur rrn'rmnria-lv additlg to the mass and bulk of the building, The 18-
inch allowance rvould also allow lor a usable wirtdow sill almost 2 ieet wide'
considering the width of a typical exterior wall (6 ' I inches)'
66 requirements). The 36
locates lhe window too high to
allows for a typical 4-foot high
3, gojo"sJru.clion Characteristics' All greenhouse wirtdows :h,18#-h^r ^^r ,^^,tirr\ cn-o^ial frrminn nr eonetruclion rngthods for s upQltd.
and
ed that they die into
*aso.:ffingle.'A small roof bver tho window qtl3tothe walf of the building a
be allowed Provided the t*th"ng in timit6d to 4 inches beyond the window plane'
I',t ------:i-------I----------I r r^T, ,^t r rr rorl PAGE E3nr lnr /1!!2 g0:AA 183476A97A NATHAN TURK
shall not require s
allal/L982 00: A8 38347b8970
<.
I.IATHAN TURK PA6E O3
s-*!+elFery1r994':l:.s'9:r::::^Yl,::T,::::i::f 3i:il^H,.*ft#ffirlinisri|,'"wasderivedonthe^asSumqti1tl':|Ie
$$ffi;'.^ """iis" sized room, it 4 F:t,lll,the mo<imurn
^arnv 2?ffi;' ;il ; .'tX"t iiJt''' t Jri ; ;ilil;d *i nd-ow is between 9 1q S,rljiljtllli;3til;; ;;'i' i'.."'in J *n Ji'[i' Jia f ;".;,1 qe no rno re 1H", i^l 1' 1 1','j: i':' l:;;i;?;,'#i ";i.rrl"brt6id inr'aoortioior side windows (18 inches,x ! t^?ut.-6 square
feel)v/ou|dbi.ingth6overa-||rvindowareatoapproximale|y44squarelee|'
h.Vn nrcenhousa windows will be alloweo per ot"tting unit, however,5. Ouarrtity ' Up to two greenhous,e wifldow
the 44 souare foot size limitatioh will apply to the combined area oi the two windows'
,Greenhouse rvindorvs shall not be counted as site coverage. "sile coveragt::-Tt,.tl:,,t"t'o
;'in"J' iHilffi il ;;' il ;; h il ;i; t^i ^ii' ot "'li r !iPl?1' *.T i f :1:1:'.s :;:3i'l::;"Jilru';[3;;E '"r in.luol anv ponton Ir I t"i'y3lqlffili:ij"?,'.'il:iii'i:
:fr:?#H:il ;;iil:';,ffi l' ;""iJil' i !''; ;; il; ,'o p ur i J
-'
n i* s s'1.:1'fl ::": :j:".1:ilioT.-[:,ffiT';::ffi'#t].; #i,il"'-ii''rr uririi.s *"rs, and snce er::*::::J"o"il"'
:?';ff:iillilllJil"rilo, srarf berieves *rey snoiia"noiue "onsioered
site coverase' Please
note that bay tt'indorr's do count as site coverage'
This policy shqJt not apply to window additions to buildings on cornmercially zoned pfopeny'
please see lhe attachsd drawing of a typical greenhouse windovr as well as sorne pholgraphic
examples of existing greenhousb windoin's throughout To\rn'
I
:'
'3
LrJ(9{IL
\
H
-F
z.Irt-4z
rl
'Tl(n
(o
\-
l.-
!?
,ii
-i)
clfil
'I
o
EXAMPLE OF GREENHOUSE WNDOW
a-l C.r.rt .. Or
STCIION vlEw
7/
/"7,t
Brondess -Codmus Reol Estote, Inc.
281 BRIDGE STREET . VAIL. COLORADO 81657
August 16, L994
Town of Vail
Dept. of Conmunity Development75 South Frontage RdVail CO 8165?
Dear Sirs:
Please be advised that the WalI Street Building CondorniniunAssociation fu1ly approves of the installation of a bay window andfoft window in Unit #301 of the Wall Street Building as shown ina sketch prepared by Circle West Architects dated 8-L2-94. Pleasecall me at 476-L450 if you have any questions.
Wall St. BIdg. Condo. Assoc.
CMG
REAL ESTATE (303) 476-14s0 . DENVER TOLL FREE 893-3101
FESER\/AT|ON_a r.800_222-\1Att . trAy {:t03) 476-3.!88
:T.'lrEsT ARcH r TEcTs =".=.U t *=
EAUOY SraoOFG
Brgg b",olt.r,-ogct''-r,,c wfu'
;i lEr#
W tlFua{p Wruoaul
s
t!
<t
{L
fts$*,
Frnrn r*e oerk of-"
, ort r/g-sKenneth B. Houman ' , /
%nu o,f W
Ee : 6'/" wrr,rf,u* + Jl "*.*/
,"Pil*q 6 A^ ' * \'/''
; , 4 +,tu,t-1 vA \o*L
adwl *{- t& j**, .,,,o,,ffis
-t trlf. , f+ ,^r.l{!' urr,r*k r,-u HLti *r[,lh[
I
p( /X.tt-+-<*+!*g(rr,t"t{-/dM
*'zzr u5-[,t' S* #fo !
:
H
{s)
o@Gircle West a" Circte West Architects. , -2077 North Frontage Roatr
Suite 108
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
(303) 479.0503
N T4TFTPI4t5t5 u u L=F TRANSNflUTTAT
seDarate cover vta
E Plans
! Change order tr
ro g*roY %oo,DF|Z
furN dF v,4rL,
WE ARE SENDING YOU Xnttu"nea I Under
D Shop drawings t
{rints
tr Copy of letter
coPrEs DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
I 6. ra.1,4 49>PfravtE- 2($7aa1
c'21\.1+2,FgdLc,uo 1ftAj B.++ ftJ rrtt0oqj.
rD.t?,14 Pt+,,J DE7411- 11l{-.;.r %+t W:NAUJ'
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:\_/& For approval./-' I For your use
! As requested
tr
D
D
D
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Returned for corrections
tr Resubmit
-
copies for approval
tr Submit
-
copies for distribution
! Return
-
corrected Prints
n For review and comment
! FOR BIDS DUE 19
-
tr PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS cA<t At€ lf Ynl WE-
A*tv At%fioilY.
COPY TO
SIGNED:^cD^ FEcYcLEo PAPER:Ed Contonts: 407. Pa€-Cgnsum€r. lO% Posl-Consumer
E enctotttre!' ete not es noted- ktndlv notltv ua at onca.
\a
C. ici;: v'r.r,r,
2Cl7 Ntan F(.rtaao t' 1 .
SLrito 1O8
Va . Colofado 81657
t {3o3) 479 0503
Tololax (303) 476 4183
Orr6clo/
P6lgr M Kolopouros O,p A/cn T
AA
August 24, 1994
Randy Stouder
Community Development
Town of Vail
Sa',! (*...':;),'.- i '-i, r- ..-
!;'' ! '
I
I
It,
, I ,'1
DsffHardy,
The wMow bcaled abovs tho Droposed bay v{indow on ths pelspodivs skotdt lor the lleuman
Condominium is to allow moro hairral lioht into an existino ld,fr arba. ll is a loft area that is op€n to
below and is very dark, since there b ndnatural light in thb area ol the condominium.
There is no code violalion since the lofl has its exisling means of ogress and is op€n to b€low .
lf you havo additional questions leel freo lo give m€ a call.
EM
Chde West Architects, P.C.
Crcle Wsst archiFcls. P C
A Prolossonal Cdpo(aion
F€ ste.6d in Colorado
Ofibo
2077 Nonh Frqtago Road
Surte 104
Vall, Coloradc 81657
, ri *o
6 ,t,,"(/ Et er/ h.4 ,&n,o,/ir.
{Rop; 4ren t1., , y/e.aV*,t./
P,e/,, fv+z ,.
, rtLU. fieuHAA)
^o&,c'
lt
frW,
Arf"
(r^u
+ ,4'q NlI! ,{ru.t Cr^A A+EnLrl;
(a.,rne*Cr E Ht ul-{i'rJ rtq0 ba
dree Prsrry€N f\-,o-g'Jn^t
*l.\'| _ {.'t - '. e
*:t".o:rt":tn
ODESTGN REVIEI{=BOARD APPLICATTON . TOWN OF
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:!r*********
******rl***I.
A.
PROJECT TNFORI{ATION:
B. TYPE OF REVIEW:
D.LrO L BIock
If properLy is described byrlocnrinr- .i an -1^^rr, Lr.\rrr., ;rreoS€ pf Ovidet.o this applicaLion.
a meeLs and boundson a separate sheet
lega1
and attach
New consrrucri:l. t$200.001 #uinor Alrerarion ($20.00)AddiLion ($s0.00) Z-ra;;;;pl;;i-;;iiew rg0)
ADDRESS, ZZ5 Ut+,,u gfWFT, #3ol
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Subdiwision
ZONING:
NAME OF
Mrilin^
APPLICANT:
Address:
r.
trhnn o
G.NAME OF APPLICATIT'S REPRESENTATTVE:Mailing Address:
hone
NAME OF OWNER(S)
F Fr!' qarf Elnrrr t, ,
VALUATION
di n ,' .! ,1 .\,.\,.r!p v I j-ij, ijuij$ 10,001 _ $ s0, 000$ 50,001-- $ 150,000
$150,001, _ $ s00,000
$500,001_ - gl-, o00,0oo$ Over $1, 000, 0OO
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAI EXPTRES ONE Y&LR AT'TER FINATAPPROVAL uNr-,Ess A BUTLDTNG pERMrr rs rssuED Ar{D coNSTRUcrroNIS STARTED.
APPLICATIONS I|TLL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOW O?INER'S SIGNATU'.E
Condominium Approvat if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above,\ are t,o be paid at theLime of submittal. of . the nna ippiipaE.lon. r,ater, whenapplvins for a building permit,' prbase-ia."tiiv-ii. u"",,rru."valuaLion of the proposal . The iown of vail wilf adjust Lhefee according to ihe- table berow, to ensure Lhe correct feeis paid-
,1 .
P ZU. UU
$ s0.00
$100. 00
$200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
Address:
rowN or(iort
STREET CUT PERMIT
WALI STREET PTANTER
SHANEIS MOI'NTAIN MASONERY
FERnrr no. 0024 g O
Cotrlrrcloda copy to b. t.pl on lobrlt..
t.
2"
t
LIC.2
t
5
i'
E
I
5iE
I
I!
{IllI
di
5
Wortbfor: rcr,*mr WATER SET/ER G^8 ETECTRIC
VAIL PROJECT)
TELEPHONE OTHER LANDSCAPING
PermltFo -0- WAMD (TOLTN OF
Blllto:
Pric: {Lr
INSPECTION REMARXS
SKSTCH PI.AN OF WORX ATTACHEO
o
1 ,,1U4 /t 'ta t'.r I
APPLICATION FOR
TOWN OFVAIL
PUBLIC WAY PERMIT
Job Nam€i
E"ij
Legal Description Street Addr€ss
z.Excavaling Contractor Name
4. Work is for lcircle onel Water Sewer
)-/
Gas Electric Teleohone
Temporary Site Access
TOV Contractor's License Number
Other
'Landscapinq )'---*- ..:,. '
Public Service Company (1-800-922-1 987)
PSCO-Natural Gas croup (468-2528)
Holy Cross Electric Company (949-5892)
2/)
,.\",
Deptn r 1(
BondAmount $Permit Fee $Total Permit Fee $
6. ALL MATERIAL, EOUIPMENT, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE BEFORE THE
JOB IS STABTED.
7. Rubber oulriggers are required on excavating equipment when working on asphalt.
Asphalt surfaces underneath the bucket shall be protected at all times.
8. A signature below indicates a review of the area and utility locations and approvals. Once all utility company' signatures are obtained, permittee has option of routing application through the Public Works ofiice to obtain the
necessary Town of Vail signatures. Please allow one week to process.
Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation (476-74801 ; li i i .)
5. Trench-wid th ,{ /
Length
(min. 4') '------------- -
t.,L{- : i)
9.
U.S. West (1 -800-922-1 987)
TCI Cablevision of the Rockies (949-5530) ' ,,. , u _' ,^ . )
Town of Vail:
lrrigation (479-2161\Electricians (47 9 -21 7 1 )
Public Works (479-21 58)
THERE WILL BE NO TOTAL STREET CLOSUREST A construction traffic control plan must be approved by the
Public Works Department prior to issuance of the permit.
Alf excavation must be done by hand within 1 8" of utilities - (Senate Btll 172).
Permittee must contact Public Works Department at 479-2158 24 hours prior to commencing bacKill operations.
Failure to notify the Town will result in forfeiture of bond money. Scheduled inspections which are not ready may
result in the Town charging the contractor a reinspection fee.
I certify thgt I have read all chapters of Title 12 - Streets and Sidewalks, of the Vail Municipal Code and all utility
comp{rybgreements, signed by me, and will abide by the same, and that all utilities have been notilied as required.
ol Agreement Oate ol Signature
ATTACH PLAN OF WORK, INCLUDING CONTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL,PLAN
Show streets with names, buildings, andlocation of cuts. USE DASH LINES FOR CUT.
f r: ;ri ( f- i, L'f u C' i:il i, '
THIS IS NOT PUBLIC WAY PERMIT!
Whiie - Public Works Yellow - Finance Pink - Community Development Gold - Contractor
10.
1t.
12.
rowN orian ,$*-*Rrr*o. 0024rt,
STREET CUT PERMIT Contnctor,r copy o h fcpt on fibrtlr.
2"
t
r WALL STREET BLDG. RrcHT FIT SPORTS 225 WALL STREETl.
TA MASoNRy rNC. po Box 146 EDr{ARDS, C0 gt632 926_2150
grcr".n rg
wortlrlor:,"*".-@-sntE^ oAg ELEcrRrc r€LEpHoNE wcABtE o*ER-
PermllFr $403.00 Permit Fee $75lBond $328
I
E
6
t
E
I
5iE
!
I
f(,
E
di
5
, Inc., P.0. Box 146, Edwards, CO 81632Blllto:
Prld:Debble S. Roeland Recclptft 592r
Fa$ Tllo.tl F!.dcrbd{
INSPECTION REMARKS
SKETCH PI.',AITI OF WORK ATTACHEO
APi'LICATION FOR
TOWN OFVAIL lPUBLICWAYPERMIT 19,
Job Nam€
/,8-
TOV Contractor's License Number
-' Start Dateq,;-
+. wor* €tor lcilte onel
Comptetion Date
' , '-i ;'1
Water Sewer Gas Electric"
(Permit Expkation Date)
Other
Landscaping
CAry
Temporary Site Access
Permit Fee $ t ,* - Total Permit Fee
5. Trench-width i /. Length
(min.4')
Bond Amount $
ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE BEFORE THE
JOB IS STARTED.
Rubber out-riggers are required on excavating equipment when working on asphalt.
Asphalt surfaces underneath the bucket shall be protected at all times.
A signature below indicates a review of the area and utility locations and approvals. Once all utility company
signatures are obtained, permittee has option of routing application through the Public Works office to obtain the
necessary Town of Vail signatures. Please allow one week to process.
Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation (416-7480)
Public Service Company (1 -8O0-922-1 987)
PSCO-Natural Gas Group (468-2528) j
Holy Cross Electric Company (949-5892)
U.S. West (1-800-922-1 987)
?,
$'
7.
9.
TCI Cablevision of the Rockies (949-5530)
Town of Vail:
lrrigation (479-2161)Electricians (479-217 1\
Public Works (479-21 58ll
THERE WILL BE NO TOTAL STREET CLOSURES! A construction trafiic control plan must be approved by the
Public Works Department prior to issuance of the permit.
All excavation must be done by hand within 1 8" of utilities - (Senate Bil 1r7Z).
Permittee must contact Public Works Department at 479-2158 24 hours prior to commencing backfill operations.
Failure to notify the Town will result in forfeiture of bond money. Scheduled inspections which are not ready may
result in the Town charging the contractor a reinspection fee.
I certify that I have read all chapters of Title 12 - Streets and Sidewalks, of the Vail Municipal Code and all utility
company agreements, signed by me, and will abide by the same, and that all utilities have been notified as required.
't0.
11.
12.
THIS IS NOT PUBLIC WAY PERMIT!
Yellow - Finance Pink - Communily Development Gold - ConlractorWhite - Public Works
f
t8'
{
+t'
'tt
5d @
z;( e #,3z{et lts-
/ tooY'-
{ ot //r
ro 4t Yi
1t'tlr ,l4r/r- .
f.tr} \Fl.- r
3f.-tt.-P- I €_'A-n*J
SEl EKCrUa..rrl€
Fur.r- BEB{rrc,E tnr s}loP
47b - t41
70.- lSo.ar>
ry r4aaa.,f
!tct8- Fl,D^tt
il
Pf-
2
Trao?
*,T$r</L
6-t3
8- 6q.e
{ta_+z='+
hl,^r
W o-t"ila^LL>
i{ad u:ln.,k = B\\^4-
(!-_ io, ___*
:,-w"AUfERU@ANr
EISGEGASU'@E
W
H
1
lL
l
ST
o
RA
G
E
5
A
L
e
5j
)e?
v
. '(D;!it )
-i€I-o\ ':r.*
{fl
,.'rl
WU frf4^
?€Nl--lfits
Pa"f( A^fi
C"Lt -\ n''n
C,- lLl11 -4
+t',6-*l't**
,r$
,..ii
I/'l
t/lV\D*
(.
0")\
.--r'\
\*Ns"=
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
December 16, 1991
MINUTES
PRESENT
Chuck Crist
Diana Donovan
Connie Knight
Kathy Langenwalter
Gena Whitten
STAFF PRESENT
Kristan Pritz
Mike Mollica
Jill Kammerer
Andy Knudtsen
Betsy Rosolack
PUBLIC HEARING
The meeting was called to orcter at 2:15 by the chairperson, Diana Donovan.
1. A rcquest tor the establishment of a 60 or 90 day revlerir perlod for an exterlor
alteratlon request ln Commerclal Core lfor Rlghtllt Sports,225 Wall Streevwall
Street Bulldlng/A part of Lots B & C, Block 5C, Vail Viltage Ftrst Flilng.
Appllcant: Robert Lazter/RtghtfttSportsPlanner: Jlll Kammerer
Jill Kammerer stated the staff recommended a 60 day review period. Chuck Crist moved to
establish a 60 day review period for Rightfit Sports, lollowed by a second by Connie Knight.
The vote was 4-0 (Kathy was out of the room for this vote.)
2. A request for approval of an exterlor alteratlon In Commerclal Core I for Rlghtllt
sports, 225 Wall streeuwall street Buitdlng/ A part ot Lots B & c, Btock 5c, vatl
Vlllage Flrst Flllng.
Appllcant: Robert Lazler/Rlghtflt SportsPlanner: Jlll Kammerer
Jill Kammerer explained on November 1 1 , 1991, the Design Review Board approved a
modification to the exterior facade of the building. The modilication reviewed and approved by
the DRB did not propose relocating the front door. Therefore, an exterior alteration approval
was not required. Exterior alteration approval is now required because the front door would
be moved foruard 5-112 teet, so that it is flush with the eastern (front) facade of the building.
In moving the door, lhe facade modification prpoposed now adds floor area, triggering the
exterior alteration approval reguirement. The interior of both floors of the retail space have
been demolished and a new interior is under construclion. The square footage of the entry
level will increase by ten square feet, and the square footage of the second lloor will increase
by five square feet. Benji Amsden, projecl architect, agreed to two conditions. l) that the
applicant contribute $400.00 to the Town of Vail parking fund and 2) the applicant contribute
$220 to the Town of Vail for the purchase of one newspaper dispenser.
Connie Knight moved to approve the exterior alteration with the two conditions. The motion
e
was seconded by Chuck Crist, and the vote was 5-0 in favor.
3. Contlnuance of a work se$slon tor a deyelopment plan modlflcatlon tor The
Valley, Phase ll. Tracts A and B, a part of Parcel A, Llons Rldge Flllng No.2,
commonly referred to as The Valley, Phase ll.
Appllcant: Grossvlew at Vall Propertles, lnc./Steve GenslerPlanner: AndyKnudtsen/KrlstanPrltz
This was a work session only. Andy Knudtsen explained how the final GRFA numbers had
been calculated. In June, 1980, Eagle County had approved a plan for the Valley Phase ll,
allowing 26 dwelling units with 32,909 square feet of GRFA. The County had excluded
balconies, hallway, corridors, stainrtrells, garages, and service areas, as well as heating or
mechanical equipment areas when calculating GRFA. Using the 1980 County definition of
GRFA, the Vail planning staff calculated what the GRFA would be for Steve Gensler's
proposed plans. These figures are shown on the top of the table on page 3 ol the memo.
The bottom ol page 3 showed how Gensler's proposal looked using the current Town GRFA
definition. The County definition would allow 700 more square feet of GRFA. In general, the
staff felt the use of credits for the new proposal was reasonable because credits had been
used by the County.
Randy Hodges, project architect, showed an overlay which indicated where the buildings,
roads and walkways had been located on the original proposal. This was laid over the current
proposal.
Kristan Pritz commented that the staff had new ideas which the applicant had not yet had an
opportunity to respond to. Andy explained that one idea would be to move the driveway onto
the easement, which would allow the applicant to move the buildings to the east and would
allow more of the forestred hillside to be preserved. He also suggested clustering some of the
homes. Randy replied that when the proposal was first brought belore the staff, the drive had
been on the easement, but someone felt lhal the driveway should line up with the road across
the street.
With regard to the upper units north of Buffehr Creek Road, Andy was concerned with the
steepness ol lhe area where the upper struclure was proposed to be constructed. He
suggested that the dwelling which was farthest up the property be moved closer to the lower
structure and that both be closer to the entrance. Andy felt the extent of disturbance caused
by construction was more important to the statf than the exact location of the foundations.
Andy expressed concern about the width of the upper road, and pointed out that the ideal
situation would be to reduce the number of dwelling units in this area to 2 units, which would
permit the road to be narrowed to 12 feet,
Steve Gensler, applicant, told the board that a mud slide was located near the entrance to the
upper units, which would not permit the lower building to be moved closer to the entrance.
Kristan responded the staff wished to move the upper unit closer to the lower unit. She
questioned whether or not the upper unit could be constructed due to the Fire Department
requirement of a minimum distance of 100 feet from the hydrant to a dwelling unit.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Departmenl
December 16, 1991
A request for approval of an exlerior alleration In Commercial Core I lor Rightfit
Sports, 225 Wali Street/vvall Street Building/ a part of Lots B & C, Block 5C'
Vail Village 1st Filing,
Applicant: RobertLazier/RightfitSports
Planner: Jill Kammerer
ll.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
Approval of an exterior alteration request is required for any addition of enclosed floor
aiea to structures in the CCI zone district. The proposal includes a 15 sq. ft. lloor area
expansion to the Rightfit Sports retail space, located on the east side of the Wall Street
Building on Wall Street. Under the redevelopment proposal the interior of the retail
space has been demolished and a new interior is under construction. The square
footage of the entry level will increase by ten square feet and the square footage ol the
second floor will increase by five square teet. The applicant is requesting PEC
approval to move the front door of the retail space fonrard so that it is flush with lhe
eastern facade ot the building.
BACKGROUND
On November 6, 1991 the Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed proposed exterior
modifications to this retail space. Under this review the applicant requested approval
ot a new awning, new signage and modifications to the facade of the building. Under
the exterior modification plans presented to the DRB there was no addition or reduction
in floor area proposed and therefore no exterior alteration approval was required. The
proposal which was submitted was approved by the DRB subject to the condition the
bn'S approue the colors to be used on the facade prior to Town issuance of a T.C.O'
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The following summarizes the zoning statistics for this exterior alteration request:
1. Zone District: CCI
2. Lot Area: 7,318 sq. ft.
ilt.
I
Coverage
tv.
3. Site : Existing:4,640
Proposed:4,640'
'No change in site coverage is proposed
with this request because the space to be
infilled is already covered by the second
floor of the building.
The applicant will be required to contribute $400.00 to the T.O.V.
parking fund. The addition will constitule 5% of one parking
space. The parking fee for 1 commercial space is $8000.00.
('t5 sq. ft./300 =.05 x $8000 = $,100.00)
4. Parking:
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUHPOSE SECTION OF COMMERCIAL CORE I
18.24.010 Puroose:
'The Commercial Core I District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the
unique character of the Vail Village Commercial Area, with its mixture of lodges
and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment.
The Commercial Core I District is intended lo ensure adequate light, air, open
space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and
uses. The dislrict regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design
Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards
.that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly
clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrian ways and public
greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural
qualities that distinguish the Village.'
The redevelopment of the Rightfit Sports retail space is in compliance with the
purpose of the CCI zone district. Under the facade modification approved by
the DRB, the applicant has increased the transparency of the facade, thereby
increasing ground level activity. The addition will not negatively effect the scale
of the building and will improve the overall quality of the space.
REVIEW CRITERIA FOH THIS PROPOSAL
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan includes three elements that establish the
review criteria for this application. The first of these is referred to as the Guide Plan
which includes a number of sub-area concepts, many of which identity potential areas
for future development and other improvementls. Secondly, the Urban Design
Considerations express the large scale, land use planning and design considerations,
and finally architectural/landscape considerations which will be reviewed by the Design
Review Board, establish the criteria for evaluating detailed design considerations of a
proposal.
The Vail Village Master Plan also addresses specific goals pertaining to the
enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village that must be considered
in this application.
In addition to lhe Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan, taditionalzoning
considerations are also a factor in this proposal.
V.
I
--COMPLIANCE WITH THE UBBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN FOR VAIL VILLAGEvt.
vlt.
There are no specific sub-areas relevant to this proposal.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDEBATIONS FOR VAIL VILI-AGE
The following design considerations ar€ a critical element of the Urban Design Guide
Plan. They identify the key physical characteristics of the Village and provide the tools
to assure that new development is consistent with this established character. These
considerations include the following:
A. Pedestrianization:
The proposed addition will have limited impacts on the pedestrian traffic flow
because of its proposed location. The addition will add interest to this
pedestrian area with the increase in window area transparency and increased
visibility into the store.
B. Vehicular Penetration:
Vehicular penetration and circulation will remain unchanged as a result of this
proposal.
C. Streetscaoe Framework:
Streelscape framework identifies two altematives lor improving the pedestrian
experience in the Village. These include the development ol open space,
including landscaping along pedestrian routes and the development of infill
commercial storefronts along pedestrian corridors. While landscaping can
provide a softening of buildings and a colorful framework, commercial infill can
provide activity generators and visual interest for the pedestrian. As previously
mentioned, under the DRB approved facade modification, the increased
transparency of the shop frontage will add visual interest to the area. The
proposed addition will relocate the front door of the entrance to the shop. The
addition will have no impact on the streetscape framework.
D. Street Enclosure:
The purpose of this consideration is to maintain a comfortable relalionship
between the width of streets and the height of buildings. The facade
modification along the Arcade will have no affect on the street enclosure of Wall
Street because it does not increase the overall height of the building. The DRB
approved addition will improve the existing condition by increasing lhe visibility
and transparency of the retail business frontage along the arcade. The
proposal to relocate the door will have no impact on street enclosure.
E. Street Edoe:
The only moditication to lhe street edge proposed under this exterior alteration
request will be moving the front door entrance to the retail space forward (five
and one half feet) so that it is flush with the facade of the building. Staff
believes that this modification will have no impact on the Wall Street street
edge.
F. Buildino Heioht:
Building height wiil be unaffected.
vlil.
G. Views and Focal points:
The proposed expansion does not affect any adopted view conidors. ln
addition, the infill wiil have no impacts on the line of sight from eiher the top or
bottom of WallStreet.
H. Service and Deliverv:
The proposed expansion will not affect current service and delivery patterns.
l. Sun/Shade:
There will be no increase in the shadow patterns as a result of this addition as
it is within the existing shade patterns of the building.
J. Architecture/LandscaoeConsiderations:
These design considerations are typically the purview of the Design Review
Board. The staff believes the architectural detailing and increasei transparenry
resulting from the redevelopment of this retail space will have positive impacts
-
on the appearance of this area by adding visual interest to the space. No
landscaping will be removed under the proposed redevelopment. However, the
applicant has agreed to contribute 9220 for one newspaper dispenser to be
installed in this area. The newspaper dispenser will be the tirsi to be installed
in the Village in keeping with the Vail Streetscape Master plan.
GOAL #2: TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURTST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE
YEAR-AROUND ECONOMIC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE
VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE.
2.4 Obiective:
Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity
. where compatible with existing land uses.
2.4.1 Policv:
Commercial infill development consistent with established, horizontal zoning regulations shall be encourage to provide
activity generators, accessible greenspaces, public plazas, and
street scape improvements to the pedestrian network throughout
the village.
The proposed infill is consistent with established zoning and the existing uses of the
area. The addition will provide interest and activity lo an area which currently
experiences limited activity.
IX. STAFF HECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation is for approval of me requested exterior alteration. The
review of the relevant Urban Design Criteria and the Vail Village Masler Plan goals
show lhat the proposal is in conformance with the applicable s€ctions of these
documents. The applicant will also be required to contribute $400.00 to the Town of
Vail parking fund. In addition to the contribution of lhe parking fund, the applicant has
indicated he will contribute $220.00 to the Town of Vail for the purchase of one
newspaper dispenser.
Staff believes the redevelopment of the Rightfit facade, which includes allowing the
front door of the business to be moved fonrvard live and one half feet, will be an
additional activity generator for the Wall Street area and will improve the area's general
appearance.
C:\PEC\MEMqS\RlGHTFlT.Dl 1
/nir lllf i
lill I
{tq
6rcn+'..Q
p.- 'h5'I5X., Ip'-n{!yrrr f latrrst
I
I
T_t-
I
I
It-
t\
.I
L
t-
I
I
'l
J-
l/
'!r""
;hr
IuI
lrlitl t
'ltllrt'
E==
ENTRY LEVEL DEMO PLAN
SCALET l/4"-1-0"
t
' 41VP UIILL tJ,/ Zo' 2'
^tzt4t WELO"U) a+E- )Cr+ "r.yl 4@E lp ----------------=
, ?tlarJa I t-ru4ttw 514t2-:-.
vAbFtal
|'AIT?IIJq P
v<tef|tl,'t 1+ taL,
64?.+
ab6+
E*4AJL4
er'ft-f L-6!a--
dfre* ulvEt-'
fra2o<e
€'*-,eA LEr/61-
JftEP=tEvsl'
q?z +
4ba.+
/@"(*1r
oo
',. v+1o )v. *tJJtJl-
w)ae et+s|t-v ...-91Ut4/eL1 *i2'3F2F. $.(/1"t7,!.fy4ta? ?}L32. Z.at/4
EAST ELEVATION
o
.ar]rJ
)
.--..- r.|laJ
EAST EL
SCALE: 1/4".f-0"
azal s415. 4p
r|!'..J D:{{
t*
"ri^'{d
\r-
|ll r,lt' ):l i\-
Y
?E.
l-hLLlfl$l)e.lalA-L
JFXS'
. t^J;W+-1(48
J-Yz',+szw'
'r d a'\i"
{wtry-
prJtl
4'3.
lll
tll
lll
Hl
I'lill l.-Jlllr I
= =/q
ENTRY LEVEL D
$\ llll
SGALE:1/4"=f-0"
EMO PLAN
o
I
4lt? ut^t:c lJ/ zo* Zo6.-<H3 WZoa) A+P- +E!tz+ F?4t4 HvEzUP
tlotLt +tA+ta.vr>
f lb7, (ALL\ afa" ANr2 a6rEt
Uttrc? nvt-Z1'rtEvL EtlJ, ?w,
WPqrtP war ?bAJ*\rpre? lc aaVW
?\t$ItrJ4- 1+ QL,
t&"'r1
I
-{-
4-atlll
W-+Oa64e ?HotJE, + zvv4*r,€',5 ,tez' +1E14.
FlNf+H I.J.rLLA= Wa'D,la nblLH A\|6fluq FrNtaH .wv,
+nVt+) @t&-42)r
\2" L-Vt- 7L1\.l*$ <{l)12 +
ffil$ +,$t-'' U+lw- FA4t
a t-?LeZ-"6r=E-
oo
I
on) tril<=JFz +tzl Fwn Hw-uP
ultw t*>vev
"Lxtz a-.arJ
E A+'frJq
e.-ry4f I-E'/a-'
)QPe? rEv€t-
7g-'e'Y*e
6,-r14f LEJ6L-
}V'ee- l'8v6t-'
4U> u-;;lL rt/
L.<-<.1,53 WL FA-A4N?- ?rbJE h VveL,wr+9 *eE 6pxt7a.
rfilFihl-r.JALL A+Wa'vfc rn$74s1 E4{J1L;G Fr
?r\tsrtl\ 1+ ur'
q?z +
<UO,,+
6az {
4U6 +
r_i_
li r--..'wi%, i
i ri ra'-tt#ll vrp \ ? ia'-rrl+tiFr"--r4{ir '-_--+-3;
L;= -.1 E- =lr'
N?f O" -AtLl,,
bbA*l tuss7t?tw h#fbrwoA
.p&4t&/"?t?
Al2-,/22
ZVI{4 4?aX
ttWg71 ,4ue W)oJ
eOt not*?
"t?L?'d* r'-otAc.14o-*
1l/.2',2_y,.6t
oo
P?Xe t-WD4rEE- -"ViStW. trE1-J frlulrry'lrya)z
t;y*ja dv, N)Jr&,
W\eUt+sft*n --,-6'tukra.t-1 vra,'?@7b?nt6I10t)aF 7++?- 4./L
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE:1/4"=f-0"
EX]STING
r_L___J Irl {
fal^L fZAltS<Z USZ'>
-
iV Awilt-aflal' W- b|qN +4. fr42,zl'-z|t+tl ;9 = b.4E4ae +tc,yJ4z
qo t)p? @ts)
+TJc,oo (FELJ -
ava,l Atu.4a
, rL'ir
$$
,.)*i{fr,
$f,
'€ttoL-'
2Lur-lN
--= NEr-J.q-
EAST ELEVATION
fL&l.J O Wat A-bls@tJ
SCALE:114"=t-O"
PROPOSED
{.$^" "t'Iv'-'o }a
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of
the Town of Vail on December 16, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building.
Consideration of:
1. A request for the establishment of a 60 or 90 day review period for an exterior
alteration in Commercial Core I to the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeVPart of Lots B
and C, Lot 5, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Rod SliferPlanner: Jill Kammerer
2. A request for the establishment of a 60 or 90 day review period for an exterior
alteration in Commercial Core llto the Cano Residence, Lionshead Center, 520 E.
Lionshead Circle, Unit 205/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing.
Applicant: Victor CanoPlanner: Andy Knudtsen
3. A request lor the establishment of a 60 or 90 day review period for an exterior
alteration in Commercial Core ll lor additional common service area to the Lifthouse
Lodge, 555 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block '1, Vail Lionshead First Filing.
Applicant: Robert Lazier/l.R.A. of Vail, lnc. dlUal Bart & Yeti'sPlanner: Shelly Mello
4. A request for the establishment of a 60 or 90 day review period for an exterior
alteration to the Lodge at Vail in Commercial Core l, Lodge Properties, Inc., 174 East
Gore Creek Drive, A part of Lots A, B and C, Block 5C, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Lodge Properties, Inc.Planner: Andy Knudtsen/Mike Mollica
5. A request for the establishment of a 60 or 90 day review period for a Commercial Core
I exterior alteration request for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots
A and B, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing,
Applicants: Golden Peak House Condominium Associationlr'ail Associates,
lnc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc.Planner: Mike Mollica
6. A request for the establishment of a 60 or g0 day review period for an exterior
alteration request in Commercial Core I for Rightfit Sporb, 225 Wall StreetMall Street
Building/A part of Lots B & C, Block 5C, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: RightfitSports/RussellShayPlanner: Jill Kammerer
7. A request for approval of an exterior alteration in Commercial Core I for Rightfit Sports,
225 Wall StreetMall Street Building/ A part of Lots B & G, Block 5C, Vail Village First
Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Rightf it SportsiRussell Shay
Jill Kammerer
ryr#,I 3i"t y:W!":*,nn'
L' i tF'r'*1
c[lP Y
.L II
8. Any items tabled from the December 9, 1991 Planning and Environmental Commisslon
meeting.
lnformation on the listed items is available at the Community Development office in the Vail
Municipal Building during regular office hours.
41b- P1/)TOWN OF VAIL
COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT
Published in the Vail Trail on November 29, 1991.
W nf 'tl/, J?, lqt @
,16: )PQ^,ry* // t*/t'z 'JqT q'lr /
A $o,fr^T^
t?( 9'* 0'!"/- 14
ilfu, & ntr"T
,7h":\ Ky &f*"/
)l,ut D^-Z( 3"
VN, c" g/u57
4 C^*';* L{/'
% c6qa,-/r-" &-/*
26 bdy 8-
V *4, A, 8)t" s7-
l
resised 9/l/gt
and fees are submitte
A.NAME OF APPLI
ADDRESSVAtt^ t
I,
Date of Applj-cation
Date of PEC Meetino
APPLICATION FOR EXTERIOR AIJTERATIONS
OR I,IODIFTCATIONS rN COMMERCIAL, CORE r
ITATL VILIAGE
The application wiII not
Planning and Environmental commissi-on review is recruired forthe allerati-on of an existing building which adds or removesany encl0sed f100r area or outdoor patio or: the replacementof an existlng building located in tne CCf Districc.FOLLOWING PEC APPROVAL, THE PROJECT MUST BE REVIEWED BY THEDESIGN REVTEW BOARD (DRB).
B.NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT' S REPRESENTAT
z-
unit alI information
PHONE
DE SCRIPTr ONJ4E o f / orc._4.
(LESS THAN
(MORE THAN
sQ. FT- )
SQ. FT. )
-1-73
z6
/,/!! :;ii''
-:"
D.
a NAME OF O
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL
STGNATURE (S)
A.rJ!r!t! D )
/ei/ 54 J/,4/l t///L401. /5r fZ/
ADDRESS
FEE \ S2oO.00
$s00.00
rrIJ- U I cK#
, THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE
DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR
II. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
ft4''t ' ,THE COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT /5! 5'"'.,
PROPOSAL :1,
'/-7 "'
100
100
BY
{xLr.rt//JG
t st ,11 -:l :'
;!'.:'j 7o C
/-4?2t(
/t/.'.1'" /'_ i.
A pre-application conference with a pranning staff member isstrongly suggested to determine if any additionalinformation is needed. No appllcation will be acceptedunLess it is complete (must incl-ude al_l items required bythe zoning administrator) . It is the applicant, sresponsi-bility to make an appointment wit.h the staff to findout about additional submittal reguirements.
III- PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE
APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NUMBER
OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PEC MAY STIPULATE. ALL
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE ABUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. Improvement survey of propert.y showing property linesand l-ocation of building and any improvements on theland.
B. A Llst of the names of owners of all property adjacentto the subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND
ACROSS STREETS, and their maiti,ng addresses. THE
APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONS]BLE POR CORRECT MAILING
.fIUIJJ\'I1JDII5.
accepted
c. Submit four (4) copies of a site-plan containing the
tolfine information: V _
1. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of
24" x 35" at, a scale of 1" -- 20' showing existing rand proposed irnprovements to the site. A
variation of the sheet or scale rnay be approved by
the Community Development Department if justified.
2. The date, north arrow, scale and name of the
proposed development wit.h it's legal description
shall be shown on the site Plan.
3. The existing topographic character of the site
including existing and proposed contours.
4, The location and size of all existing and proposed
buildings, structures and improvements.
5. The existing and proposed landscapingr patiost
additions or deletions.
5. A title report to verify ownership and easements.
7. Preliminary building elevations, sections, and
floor plans, at a scale not smaller than one*
eighth equals one foot, in sufficient detail to
deLermine floor area, gross residential floor
area, interior circulation, locations of uses
wj-thin buildingsr dnd the generaL scale and
appearance of the proposed development.
IV. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITidN AND GRAPHIC FORM A
PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE PLANNING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION INDICATING THAT ;
A. THE PROPOSAL IS IN CONFORMANCE W]TH THE PURPOSES OF THE
CCI DISTRICT AS SPECIFIED IN 18 .24.01-0.
B. THE PROPOSAL SUBSTANTIALLY COMPL]ES WITH THE VAIL
VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN REGARDING:
1. Pedestrianization2. Vehicle Penetration3. SLreetscape Framework
4. Street Enclosure5. Street Edge
6. Building Height'l . Views8. Sun Shade Consideration
Many of the above items should be addressed by graphic
neansr such as sketches, models (including neighboring
buildings), photos, etc.
If the applicant is proposing a major change to the
vail Village Urban Design Guide PIan, the procedure for
changes are noted in Section 1.8.24.220 (B\ .
C. THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD.
V. THE TOWN OF VAIL ZONING CODE FOR CCI ALSO DESCRIBES OTHER
ZON]NG ISSUES THAT THE APPLICANT MUST RESPOND TO IN WRITTEN
OR GRAPHIC FORM.
VI. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MAY DETERMINE THAT ADDITIONAL
MATERIAI IS NECESSARY FOR THE REVIEW OF THE APPLICAT]ON.
I
t
vrr. AppLrcArroNS ,o$*r"*roR ALTERATT.NS o* tottcArroNs rN
CCI INVOLVING MORE THAN ].OO SOUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA ARE
ONLY REVIEWED SEMI_ANNUALLY. THEY NEED TO BE SUBMITTED ON
OR BEFOP€ THE FOURTH MONDAY OF MAY OR NOVEMBER. THE PEC
HOLDS A PP€LIMINARY REVIEW SESS]ON WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE
SUBM]TTAL DATE. A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE HELD WITHIN 60
DAYS OF THE PRELIMINARY REVIEW SESSION. APPLICATIONS FOR
THE ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT ADDS OR REMOVES
ANY ENCLOSED FLOOR AREA OF NOT MORE THAN ].OO SOUARE FEET MAY
BE SUBMITTED AT THE REQUIRED TIME OF THE MONTH FOR PLANNING
AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) REVIEW. FOR MORE
spEcrFlcs oN THE REVTEW SCHEDULE, SEE SECTTON 18.24.065(A5).
VIII YOUR PROPOSAL WILL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH VAIL, S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
rx.If Lhis application requires a separate review by any
Iocal, State or Federal agency other than the Town of
Vail, the application fee shall be increased by
$200.00. Examples of such review, may include, but are
not limited to: Colorado Department of Highway Access
Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shal-I be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are j-n excess of 503 of the
application fee. If, at t.he applicantts requestr aDY
matter i.s postponed for hearing, causing the matter to
be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Conmunity Development
Department to have significant design, land use or
other issues which may have a significant impact on Lhe
community may require review by consultants other that
town staff. Should a determination be made by the town
staff that an outside consultant is needed to review
any appli-cation, Community Development may hire an
outside consuLtant, it shaLl estimate the amount of
money necessary to pay him or her and this amount shall
be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time
he files his application with the Community Development
Department. Upon completion of the review of the
application by the consultant, any of the funds
forwarded by the applicant for payment of the
consuftant which have not been paid to the consultant
shall be returned to the applicant. Expenses incurred
by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the
applicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant
within 30 days of notification by the Town.
B.
'2-'\,J)
, |'.'-tr-E \Project Application
Date //.b'7/zti
Project Name:
Project Description:
fia Stru.ls 0uf7&u.
Gontact Person and
K#looo,"""andphone: 4o a T 4tin, fa.8- ISZS , tkt/,A. yas-
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description :tors B&C . etocx 5C , rtme hht/ l4/ba i /{ . zon" ccf
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date //.b f/
Motion by. 4fO. /anrb
Seconded by:
a/F- Et 4a ' < r^ 'w21414a/ars
DISAPPROVAL
fu candt.*or, z
Summary:
APPROVA L
E statt Approval
1,
revised 9l4l9LT:DRB APPLIqATION - TOMT OF VAIL,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
coroRrDo
ro-rw_99T1a1eet
rErs APPLtorfil;;;iio, * rccEprED
nNrrr. AI.t REQurTp**t*xo*T'l|JroN rs snBtdrEtED
I.PLOJECT INFORI'IAT ION :
A. DESCRIPTION:
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction ($200. OOt _liuinor Alteration ($20.00)
Addition (S50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
C. ADDRESS:25
D.LEGAL DESCRIPTIaN YI,SL ,a',do Block 5C
subdivisi on utar/ tl//aqu E E/rrzq
If property is described by a meets and bounds lega1description, please provide on a separate sheet andattach to this application.
ZONING = Cbl
F.
G.
r.
NAI4E OF
MaiJ-ing
APPLICANT' S
Address:
LOT AREA: ff required,
stamped survey showing
NA}4E OF APPLICANT:
MaiLing Address:
applicant must provide a currentlot area.
REPRESENTATIVE:H ttEzt c*- xt *t ttttss - EErtJ tAc,tad,/
< 41rb
Ilala
$ 20.00
$ 50. oo '"'z'7 ,..-.,
$100.00
s200.00
$400.00
$s00.00
NAME OF
srGr|lfllRE (s) :
Mai-l-rjq Addre
Phone .{7A -€Gt c)
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.42(r - e?oq
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe time of submittal of DRB application. Later, whenapplying for a building permit, please identify theaccurate valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vail
wi.1l adjust the fee according to the table below, to
ensure the correct fee is paid.
FEE PAID: $
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATIONI 0 - $ 10,000$10,001 -$ 501000"- I50,001 -$ 150,000
$150r001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ over $1,000,000
* DESIGN REVIEI{ BOARD APPROVAI EXPIRES ONE YE,AR AFIER FI}IEI
IPPRO\TAI. ['I{I.ESS A BUII.DING PERMU IS ISSUED A}ID CONSTRI'CTTON TS
SrIRTED.
**NO IPPLICATION T9ILL BE PR@ESSED I|ITEOIII O9|NER'S SIGNATURE
T0: rSrGN APPLICAIITS
When applications for signs are subrnit.ted, the followinginformation is required:
L. A completed sign,/awning application (attached) .
2. A site plan showi4g the exact location where the signis to be located.
3. A photograph if possible and buitding elevation showlng
'the location of the proposed sign.
4. A scaled drawing which detaits, the design of the sign,as follows:
(a) Colored exactly as sign will be.(b) A list of materiaLs to be used in sign (metal,
wood, canvas, paint., etc,)(c) Photograph of sign if available.(d) Specific lettering style and size.
5. If an awning is proposed, subnit drawings showingexactly how and where the awning is attached to thebuilding and how the awning is to be constructed.
6. Description of lighting that will be used inconjunction with the sign or awning. If proposing an
argning, lighting is not allowed to shine through theentj.re awning which calls undue attention to thebusiness. Lighting may spotlight only the actual signlettering on the awning.
PSCOMMENDATIONS OR POINTERS
1. Check sign code - verify site, height etc.2. Be specific. Vagueness on design, size, construction maydelay the approval of your sign.3. Measure frontage of business.
APPLICATION FEE WILL BE REOUIRED AT THE TIME OE APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL.
If this applicat.ion requires a separate review by any IocaI,State or Federal agency other than the Town of Vai1, theapplication fee shal1 be increased by $200.00. Examples of suchreview, may j-ncIude, but. are'.not linited to: Colorado Departmentof Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc.
The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fees
which are in excess of 50t of the application fee. If, at theapplicant's requestr dDy matter is postponed for hearing, causingthe natter to be re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant.
Applications deemed by the Community Developnent Department to
have significant design, land use or other issues which may have
a significant impact on the communit.y may require review by
consultants other that town staff. Should a determination be
made by the town staff that an outside consultant is needed to
review any application, Community Development may hire an outsideconsultant, it shaI1 estimate the amount of money necessary to
pay him or her and this amount sha1l be forwarded to the Town by
the applicant at the time he fiLes his application wit.h the
Community Development Department. Upon completion of the review
of the application by the consultanL, any of the funds forwarded
by Lhe applicant for payment of the consultant which have not
been paid to the consultant shall be returned to the applicant.
Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded
by the applicant shall be paid to t.he Town by the applicant
within 30 days of gotification by lhe Town.
(Please Print or
NAME OF PROJECT
ADDRESS l-Z *tY1 Of, ,-.NEJ^IfrD. C'o' BOZZ'8
NAME oF o$rNER L#. fiil.rct t- psownSab 5*2?-
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
LOCATION OF
DESCRIPTION
oF ot{![ER
6,
OF PROJECT
NAME OF pERSoN suBMrrrrNC fazerLJt A.r16r''r+J pnonr@)-19&!9
PROJECT
THEFoLLowINGINFoRMATIoNISP€oUIREDFoRSUBMITTALBYTHE
APPLICANT pRroR TO THE nsouesT BEfFSCHEDULED BEFORE THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD.
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGN/AWNING
PROJECTING' ETC), INCLUDE SIGN
(FREE STA}JDING, . WALL,
MESSAGE. AI4,A-I O ,A(1
t<r
B.SIGN OR AWNING MATERIAL
SIZE OF OVERALL SIGN,SIZE OF LETTERING AND LOGO
il fr = +.otfr
n
_l tr
HEIGHT OF SIGN ABOVE GRADE q.f
DESCRIBE LIGHTING (EXISTING OR PROPOSED)
F.
H.
IENGTH OF BUSINESS FRONTAGE (FT)
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION APPROVAL
PATD
1
z
3
5
f sign
Sample of ProPosed materials
ehotograph of sign if available
,,t"1,vhri
21t- et/*t'
FEE: $20.00 PLUS $1-00 PER SQUARE FOOT OF
DATE
SIGN AREA.
CHECK NO.
Site Plan
Elevations showing exact location o
awning on the building
ehotolraphs showing proposed focati
Colored scale drawing
Siqn Adninistrator
i NAME OF PRO,JECT:
LIST OF MATERIALS fifffi OCr 21rcs:
LEGAL DESCRTPTTON: LOT;f W.OCX 1flQ SUBDTVTSTON VAr-VrU.aqe. rt*gOtrtf
STREET ADDRESS I 225 A)LJ-.V 3f.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : FS.4+be- A.r-lEE-CflOd
The foLlowing information is
Review Board before a final
A. BUILDING MATERIAIS:
Roof
Siding
Other WaIl Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck RaiLs
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
OLher
reguired for submittal to the Design
approval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAT COLOR
TEA,!-
Mininum caliper for
height for coniferous
67fLC-t
ti Fs*?-
B.
tr,laoo *-t,lJ)6-
LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
Phone:
PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Conmon Name Ouantity Size*
PROPOSED TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*fndicate caliDer for deciduous trees.
trees.Indicate
|---v
'ri ffi0uut j''
lil-Brondess-Codmus Reol Estote, Inc.
-ZIIED\\./rrrsrq\\ 281 BRIDGE STBEET . VAIL, COLORADO 81657/f4tt& wlltft\wJt
\\" 3\\dii
off"..
October 11, 1991
Town of VaiI
Dept. of Community Development
75 S. Frontage Rd.Vaii, CO 8L657
Dear Sirs:
Please be advised that the wall Street Building Condominium
Association fully approves of the exterior changes to be rnade to
the WalI Street Building by Right Fit Sports as shown in a drawing
prepared by Maverick Architects.
Please call me at Brandess-Cadnus if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ct'{G
WALL STREET BLDG coNDo.
REAL ESTATE (303) 476-1450 o DENVER TOLL FREE 893-3101
NATIONWTDE TOLL FREE (800) 222-VAtL
tlJNL.f
Ha r.^r
-
-- - - -i--+--T ;<B- -P-t;$t
t3.'- ' I r.r*r fr
' L Dfat --
Ittrr -a J.nu.(v I
I"'-yrrL ^r.ocr^"t
, rE. I or-r.
ii .*-*. -t-,--dlt.- r-". I Lril rs $g
;l --rr cot-orrdo, lrLt''r." I t-A *-
li oarr r. utttr .Dd otltr J' ulltl' 'r Il: tclet taEants I
.l 1i; orl r ..{It. - Ib" I
,i
-Ji*.* r -irr 'r'
'r rrlrrltl t b.- r.r a lb F'-i ir'.. t'"-i'r' 1::-: -::: -,..-' ooril'ia-ix-othar good .nd v.lu.blr con'I'ltr't r^* r.-J-.-.....r. If i-J'a- a1prr rr d! t J F't r..r rb
-rr. : - t. G-
--:t-ffi:.-
:r= =:r f;Jr#;;:HJ=-E;r,'"i u ..a . .
:i iig-tftl:,, "rt,fiJitll-rtrrnr' rc.ordrne to 'h' r"c'c'd
i tlat ih.taol d.acrtbt' tt- ritr-tt ;o'!tnc l'ng 't thr llofthrrrt
,l ircrarr ot r.ld tat u. til*t-itttttty 'long tht lotthtrly I tnt 'rt
:lrrlrr t^ot b. rrent,- .u,I"ii g: l'1; ":"li: :.:::::] :ll ,l';1",..
iilffi*il#t*ti*qrilrfiil:t'i, ;
I Flnt ol b.llnnlnf,
l' -" lT.l arr-'Ft ih.rt *'dsr-F ^r
,i -.. --.* -.-* -lt#'.LTlltl-:
5; t;-'
rr r't "'t r"''tr'
::
;i lrojrety trr" 'u'-ln.ll corrnrntr ot rrcort.
'j erlelrntr ana Prot'ol rvr
:'
- * - B.tl
e '. *1,qrr:r r'- :-r. -'r-- ffi:;.#ffii.-J,-,,jiF fi
i
i':';'#f 'L'.rft7irn t, .rfr1.,"f17,:f,-- r
irdffH.Sr..- i- --.,.. .,.: ..,J .r.,,\r.rv . r
,1 '.:-t,i ;1'ci''
r-4 llr' " lr- -- ,-.;-..f
tatat i. tllbal' t
_ ^..r.r.n.
t-F-., J
l. L. lr l d'," . -.F.-vrtL AttoclAt'tl ' lx( 'rt'lLl'!i1r -r-- APrrl \' lrrl' I
I' 'gs-i-rrtrr:
tegal:
Bldg. Perult No.:
ProJ ect !Addrese:
ITot
In installrnents after date,order of the Town of Vail atBuilding at Vail, Colorado,
Dotn Payment
with lnterest of tenyearly installments
The first installment
the second installnent
the third installrnent
the fourth installnent
as follows:
of$
of$
of$
of$
on
due
due
due and
due and
Dollars,
e unpaid balance, payable in
and payable
payable
payable
payable
and
on
rt is agreed that if this note is not paid when due or declared duehereunder, ttre principal and accrued interest thereon shal-l draw interestat the rate of 18 percent per annum, and that failure to make any paynentof principal. or interest when due or any default under any incunbrance oragreement securing this note shall cause the whole note to becorne due atonce, or the interest to be counted as princlpal, at the option of theholder of the note. The nakers and endorsers hereof severally waivepresentnent for payment, protest, notice on nonpa]anent and of protest, andagtree to any extension of tine of palment and partlal palzlnents before, at,or after naturity' and if this note or interest thereon -is not paid whendue, or suit is 6iought, agree to pay aII reasonable costs of collection,including reasonable attorneyrs fees,
by:
vair,eotorado, +1 ,affi-?f
for value received,the Office of the
f prornise to pay to theFinance Director, Municipal
Date
Proiect Application
Project Name:
Pro.iect Description:
Contact Person and
Own€r, Address and Phone:
Legal D€scription: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
7^"-Approval
t I
Project Application
o*, c1 ' l? 1o
Projecl Name:
Prolect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot erocx 5(, ,rrrins
eview Board
.on"(( l
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Staff Approval
DnE lPlIrICi[TIoU
DATE APPLTCATION RECET\IED:
DATE OF DRB IIIEETING:
t -'.^SSt Sgf u:=' "
n- \-q.o
n-,n -a[-
*****TIIIS APPLICATION WILL NOf BE ACCESTED ITNTIL ALIJ INFORI'IATION
IS SIIBI,IITEED*****
r. PRE-APPLTCATION I.TEETINGS
.& pre-application neetlng wlthstrorrgly suggested to deter:rnineinfomation is needed. No aDpl
a planning staff nernber isif any additional
. It is the applicantre
aooolntuent with the Etaff to flndresponsibifity to nake an appolntuent with the Etaff to fout about additional subnittal reguirements. Pleaae notethat a COITIPI.'ETE applLcatl.on wlll streanline the approvalprocess for your project by decreasing the nunber ofconditions of approval that the DRB nay stLpulate. ALLconditions of approval nust be resolved before a buildingpetmit is issued. Application will not be processed
without Ownerrs Signature.
A-r-r..|.,,,r o$ A1 '
={. -+A. PROJEET DESCRIPTION:
B.IFCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address 225 l^].-t[ er+rr:cF
Legal Description I€t Block
Subdivision V ltl-zoningfu
C. NAI-IE OF APPLICANT:
!{ailing Address:
o^rL6
-
Phone +1G- l++1
D. NN,TE OF APPLICANTIS REPRESENTATTVEs
Mailing Address:
Phone {Ltp'bb11
b{.t I
,.r.Lt)E.NAI'IE OF OI{NERSS
EICrAEunE(8) s
l{ailing
AlL.ryl Phone +-Lto- l++1
F. Condoniniun Approval lf applicable. (9ae- PEC, :"^tr"^;+{*l )
G. DRB FEE: llhe fee will be paid at the'tilre a bulldlnct
oer:nit is paid for.
ItALgAgIgN
$ o-
$ 10,001 -
$ 50,001 -
$150,001 -
$500,001 -$ Over
$ 10,ooo
$ 50,000
$ 150,000
$ 500,000
91, Ooo, ooo
$1, 000, ooo
FEE
$ lo.oo
$ zs.oo
$ so.oo
$too. oo
$20O. OO
$30O. OO
1)
I{ATERIAI,TO BE SUBMITTED
I.NEW CONSTRUCTTON
A. Jh#=onies of a topogranhic nan and s{te plalr at-a'state -ot fn = ZO@he site contalning the
- following:
1. Licensed sunreYorrs stanP.
2. Contour lntenrals of not more than 2r unless the
parcel consists of 6 acreE or nore,,in which case'-5t contour interrrals nay be accepted'
3. Existing trees or gloups of trees having trunks
with diineters of i" oi nore one foot above grade'
4. Rock outcropplngs and other slgnlflcant natural
ieatures (liige-boulders, intertlttent streams,
etc. ) .
5. Avalanche areas, centerline of stream or creek,
creelc or stream'setback, lOO-year flood plal-n and
slopes of 4ot or more, if applicable'
6. Ties to existing benchnark, either UsGs landnark
or sewer invert.
7. Locations of the following:
a. Proposed surface drainage ol and off site'
stroirlng size and type of culverts, Bwafes'
etc.
b. Exact locationE of all utilities to include
existing sources and proposed se-rrrl'ce. lines
t"on toitces to ttre slruLture' utilities to
include:
Cable IV Sewer Gas
TelePhone tlater Electric
c. Property llnes showing distances and bearings
and a blsls of bearing
d. Proposed driveways uith percent slope and
sPot elevations
e. AII easements (Title report.must aIEo include
eGileasenent locations )
8. Existing and finLshed grades'
9. AII existing and proposed I'nprovernents lncludlng
atructuresr'landscapLd areas, senrice areas'
etorage areas, walks, drivewgyg, off-:itreeE.piiiiig, rJaaini-ii"1"-, retaln!'ns !?rls (with spot
elevationr-"i-I6p-ind iottorn of walls), and otlrer
site inProvements.
10. Elevatlons ot EoP or Fqsr +r'r"=o '-*-" ------rv' ::ffitrl"'
lndicated ""-[tl--Erte plan. ElevationE.for roof
tfaq"t ehall also be i-ndicatea on the site plan
;i;i-;";;"=p""ai"g flniEhed and existing- grade
elevatlons. u" fi6ttion of the roof shall exceed
33 feet.
IIST OF I{ATERTAI,S
NAI'IE OF PRGIECT:
LEGAL DESCRISTION: IOT_ BInCK sUBDMsIou V.w" ref Elli€
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIIETON OF PROJECT:
F- .. n ^r,n.(.^. r rr*{.1 n ,^rr. q .f^ ur.,ln.Trl €*r+{trtg \- f ...r'rz{sUS,
The following infotmation'is requlred for EubnLttal to the DesJ-gn
RevLew Board before a flnal approval can be given:
A. BI'ILDING MATERIAI^g:TYPE OF UATERIAL
Roof
Siding
Other tlall Materials
Fascla
Sofflts
l{indows
I{indow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chlnneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
other
LANDSCAPING: Nane of Designer:
Phone:
PIAI{T !,IATERIAL,S: Botanical Name
EXISIING TREES TO
BE REUOVED
*Indicate
COI'R
s+"".^ C^.*- qt*ll
B.
Cornmon Name
e!r4l!41-F44.
ouantltv SLze*2 +"o.4*.PROPOSED TREES *-/t/\ ---
caliper for deciduous trees. llinirnun calio?f for
treel iE 2 inches. rndicate height for coniferous
trees.
a.^e) Yf'*-. releri,c.'n.^*
l-^^Ae^pr45 ab f*-TOV Lo.^o\>cere /"tE')^",+"tt
o
ADEOUATE AVAIIJABTTTTY A}ID
UTILITY IOCATION VERTFICATION
SUBDIVISION
JOE NAI.IE
IOT BIOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The locatl.on and availability of utllltles, rhether they be nalntrunk lines or proposed lines, nuet be approved and verLfled bythe following utilities for the acconpanyl.ng slte plan.
Authorl-zed Siqnature Date
U.S. West Conmunications
1-800-922-1987
468-6860 0r 949-4530
Publlc Senrice eompany
949-5781
Gary Hall
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
94 9-5892
Ted Husky/t{icbael Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.V.
949-5539
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagle Valley water
& Sanltation District *
476-7480
Fred Haslee
NOTE:These verlfications do not relLeve the contractor ofhis responsibitity to obtain a street cut pemit from
the Town of Vail , Departnent of Public Works and to
obtain utility locatlons before dicrging in.any public
right-of-uay or easenrent in the Tonn of VaiI. Abuildincr perrnlt lE not a street cut p . A etreetcut pemit tlust be obtalned separately.
This form is to verlfy service availability andlocation. Thls should be used in conJunction with
preparing your utlllty plan and schedulinginstallations.
* Please brlng a site plan, floor plan, and elevations when
obtalnlng upper Eag1e vall6y t9ater & SanltatLon signatures. Flre
flor needs nust be addressed.
:
,t
ZONE CHECK
FOR
sFR, R, R P/S ZONE DTSTRICTS
DATE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L,ot Block _ Filing
ADDRESS:
OWNER
Fence/Retaining I{alJ, Heights 3r/6,
Parking Reqrd
Credits: carage
PHONE
PHONE
Allowed Existinq Proposed Total
(30) (33)
20.
15 1
15 1
(30) (50)
(300) (600)
(eoo) (1200)
(s0) (100)
(2s) (s0)
(2oo) (400)
ARCHITECT
IOT SIZE
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
Height
Total GRI'A
Prfuoary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course
Site Coverage
Iandscaping
l,[echanical
Airlock
storage
Drive: Permitted Slope 88 Actual Slope
Approved by Town Engineer:Date:
Environmental/llazards :
Avalanche 1) Flood Plain
2) I Slope
3) Geologic Hazards
a) Snow Avalanche
b) RockfalI
c) Debris Flow
4) Wetlands
,u fi" r/try
CIV\il/& \Y['
- W slt \nfusca4n^{
,l+t+s'" a 6moil ol,orvrAtlAlot rrtr '\a(A
Nv-'O L?6ey
d{v1
{ndtuw
aho\n e;"rp,Pif
0
t
I.
IfuUrd,s 00,'W
urlin ktr ) v{vn fb
llo:
FRO}T:
DATE:
RE:A request for an exterior alterattonViLlage lst Filing, 225 Wall Street.Applicant: American Angler/American
on Block 5C, VaiI
Ski Bxchange
*.sfu
I. DESCRTPTION OF THE REOUEST
Approval of an exterior alteration request is reguired for
any addition of enclosed floor area to structures ln the ccl
zone district. The proposal includes a 95 scr. ft. groundfloor expansion of the American Anglerr/Anerican Ski Exchangeretail space, located at the south end of the arcade, of the
Lazier Building on WalI Street. The expanEion includes the
relocatj.on of the store entry and the addition of two bay
windows to the store. A new entry will also be added for
access to the basement area of the buiLding. The proposedinfill area is currently an open exterior space and provides
access to other areas of the building. The expansion is
proposed exclusively on private property.
II. ZONING CONSIDERATTONS
The following sunmarizes the zoning statistics for thisexterior alteration request:
1. Zone District: ccl
2. Lot Area: 7,3LB sg. ft.
3. Site coverage: Existing: 4,640
Proposed:4r640*
-rtpt-.Jfi V ro Lhange iir site coverage wirl occurv \,[/" u because the space to be infilled ls/\-fW zV |-"E -^'gr')'- *,^( already covered by the second floor of
-r,.. N the buitding.,\) "1il' \oV', u t^.|,n c..V[/ u ,"_4, \. Parking: The applicant wiII be reguired to contribute
.r\lln- I $goo.oo to the T.o.v. parking fund. The
.nfl' additlon will constitute 32t ot a parking
n*;0./ \ space. The parking fee for 1 conmercialvl\r" space is $3000.00. (96 sq. tt../3oo -.32 x
$sooo - $960.00)
III. COUPI,IANCE WITH THE PURPOSE SECIION OF COI,TI,TERCIAL CORE T
18.24.010 Purpose:
The Cornmercial Core f District is intended to provldesites and to rnaintaLn the unique character of the VallVillage Conmercial Area, with lts nixture of Lodges and
comnercial estabtishnents Ln a predoninantly pedestrian
environment. The Connercial core I Dlstrict is
intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, andother anenities appropriate to the permitted types ofbuildings and uses. Ttre district regulatlons in
accordance with the Vail Village Urban Deslgn GuLde
Plan and Design Consl.derations prescribe site
development standards that are intended to ensure the
maintenance and presenration of the tightly clustered
arrangements of buildlngs fronting on pedestrian ways
and public greenhrays, and to ensure continuation of the
buiJ-ding scale and architectural gualities thatdistinguish the Village.
The infill project is ln conpliance with the purpose of the
CCr zone district. The addltlon will be an activitygenerator in an area whl.ch le currently void of conmerciaLa€tivlty. llhe addition slll not negatively affect the scaleof the building and will inprove the overall quality of the
sPace.
IV. REVTEW CRITERTA FOR THTS PROPOSAL
the Vail Village Urban Design Guide PIan includes three
elements that establish the review criteria for thisapplication. The first of tbese is referred to as the Guide
.,,,2 Plan which includes a number of sub-area concepts, many of.rr(W which identify potential areas for future development and
tfv' ^,0, ::l:T- iitl?::i"l!::- -:":g1dll:-!h:-YTl"'. ?::'g:^ -r ^-- { --,. {'\h^T'' n other improvements. Secondly, the Urban Design
- ,rrN "'r ,r tlk Considerations express the large scale, land use planning
't)0.$t"- r\'Nw$, and design considerat5.ons, and finally
-:. .\ \';r{V" archLtectural/landscape considerations which will be
0\$^t Nt\ reviewed by the oesiq-n Review Board, establj-sh the criteria
. rr..{{-'"'\AJrp for evaluating detailed design consLderations of a proposal.
. u.tr:$l\ts (W*- -' v r'5er'r"rsr'' r.=e'sY' ev's
V\'1 il) ,n# The Vail village ltaster PIan also addresses specific goals
1414" Olp'\r$ertaining to the enhancenent of the walking experiencet')- -tf-t" !.rn\throughout the Village that nust be considered ln this
ft Xtvrw[y$" . aPPlication'
" .-,^19- .r ,, Url- fn addition to the Guide Plan and the vail Village llasterUo'\\r\\u'\ nlan, traditional zoning considerations are also a factor in
\ \t [ n.;.--this proposal .[A)r\rr,i\ d\,tJvt- v" A&,{ \
{}..\),='Y2
V. COI'IPLIANCE WITH THE T'RBAN DESIGN GUII'E PI,AI{ FOR VAIL VILI,AGE
There are no specific sub-areas relevant to this proposal .
VT. COMPIJIANCE WTrH THE T'RBAN DESTGN CONSTDERATTONS FOR VAIL
VILI,AGE
The followLng design consLderations are a critical elenentof the Urban Design Plan. They identify the key physicalcharacteristics of the Viltage and provide the tools to
assure that new development be conEl.stent with thisestablished character. These consideratlons include thefollowing:
A. Pedestrianization:
The proposed addition will have llnited inpacts on thepedestrLan traffic flow because of Lts proposedIocation. The addition will add interest to thispedestrian area with the increase Ln wLndow area and
increased visibility of the entry of the store.
B. Vehicular Penetration:
Vehicular penetration or circulation will renain
unchanged as a result of this proposal .
Streetscape Framework:
Streetscape frarnework ldentifies trro alternatives for
lrrproving the pedestrl.an experience in the Vi1lage.
These include the development of open space including
landscaping along pedestrian routes and the developnentof infill cornmercial storefronts along pedestriancorridors. t{hile landscaping can provide a softeningof buildings and a colorful franework, comnerciallnfill can provide activity generators and visualInterest to the pedestrian, according to thisconsideration. The proposed addition will reLocate thestore entrance to the front of the shop and add two bay
windows. All of the itens ulll lnprove the pedestrian
ex;lerience by convertlng an otherrrise unused space intovlable conmercial area. rn addition, the increased
transparency of the shop frontage will add visual
Lnterest to the area.
Street Enclosure:
The puryose of this consideration is to maintal-n a
cornfortable retationshlp between the wldth of streets
and the height of buildings. Ihe one story additLon
along the arcade uiII have no effect on the street
enclosure of WalI Street because it does not increasethe overall helght of the buildlng and although it does
encroach lnto the pedestrian corridor, the impact does
c.
D.
not increase because of the projecting rnass above. The
addition will inprove the existing condition by
increasing the amount of retail busLneEs frontage alongthe arcade.
E. Street Edqe:
There are no standard setback requirements in the VailVlllage. Rather, propoeals are looked at withrelationship to ttre site and the surrounding
developrnent of the Eite to insure a strong street edge.
The addltlon will partially fitl an area void of
cornmerciaL activity along t{all Street. The street edgeof Wall Street w111 be lnproved with the continuationof ttre existing building line.
F. Building Height:
Building height will be unaffected.
c. Views and Focal Points:
The proposed expansLon does not affect any adopted viewcorridors. In addition, the infill w111 have no
impacts on the line of sight from either the top or
bottom of Wall Street.
H. Senrice and Delivery:
The proposed expansion will not affect the current
service and delivery patterns.
I. Sun/Shade:
There will be no increase in the shadow pattern as a
result of this addition because it is within the
existing shade pattern of the building.
J. Architecture./Landscape Considerations:
These design considerations are typicatly the purview
of the Design Review Board. The staff feels that the
detailing and increased transparency of this corner of
the building riII have positive inpacts on the arcade
area of the building. Also, the infill of this spacewill irnprove tlre appearance of this area by addingvisual interest to the space.
The addition will be rernoving 94 sq. ft. of brick
pavers which are considered landscaping by definition.
In order to remove landscaping in the ccl zonedistrict, sufficient cause nust be shown by the
appllcant or as specLfied in the valI Village Urban
Desigm Consideratlons. In other instances reguests ofthis nature have been reguired to obtain a landscapevariance in order to decrease the amount of
softscape,/trardscape landscaping on site. This was
necessary because they were decreasing both tlpes of
landscaping and thus changing the ratio of hardscape tosoftscape. This tlpe of change reguires a variance
because according to the definition of lapdscaping only20t of tbe overall amount can be in hardscape tlpe
landscaping.
In this application the anount of hardscape is
. decreasing and actually naking the situation less
nonconforning in regard to the landscape definition'requirement. lfherefore, we are not reguiring the
approval of a landscape variance for this appllcation.
The staff finds that the application is consigtent with
the Vail Village Deslgn Considerations. In addition,the applicatl.on ls conElEtent sith the goals andpolicies of the Vall Village l-laster Plan. We also feelthat the benefits of the project outweigh the impactsof removing the paved area.
The applicant has agreed to contribute up to 9500 for
the repair of the paved staimay located adJacent tothe bullding. The staff, feels the repair andinstallation of new pavers ln this area is an
appropriate reguirement to nitigate the renoval of tlre
pavers in tlre infill area. The Town of ValI landscapearctritect reviewed the proJect and recomrnend the paver
treatnent as an inprovenent needed in the area.
Below is a sumnary of the existing and proposed
landscaping as they relate to the total area of thesite*:
Lot Size: 7,318 sq. ft.
Existing Landscape 1715 sq. ft. or 23.4* of hardscape
115 scr. ft. or 1.6* of softscaPe
X83O sq. ft. or 25.ot of the site
Proposed Landscape 1621 sq. ft. or 22.L2 of hardscape
115 scr. ft. or 1.6* of softscaPe
1?36 sq. ft. or 23.7* of the Eite
*Alley ways and areas betneen buildings which are not
accessible to pedestrians and do not have any landscapedqualitles lrave not been considered landscaping.
VII. RELATED GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE VAIL VILLAGE I'fASTER PLAN
GOAL #2: TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST TNDUSTRY AND PRO!,IOTE
YEAR-AROUND ECONOI.TIC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE
VII.,LAGE AND FOR THE COI,T},TT'NITY AS A T{HOLE.
2.4
2.4.1
Obiective:
Encourage the developnent of a variety of new
conmercial actlvity where conpatible wl-th existing
land uses.
Policy:
Cornmercial lnfill development consistent with
established horizontal zonl,ng regulationsshall be encourage to provide activitygenerators, accessible greenspaces, publ-icplazas, and street scape improvements to thepedestrian network throughout the Village.
The proposed infill is consistent with established zoning
and the existing uses of the area. The addition will
provJ.de interest and activity to an area nhich currently
e:rperiences lLnited activity.
VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON
Ttre staff reconnendatlon is for approval of the reguestedexterior alteration. The review of the relevant Urban
Design Criteria and the Vail Vlllage Master Plan goals showthat the proposal is ln confornance wj.th the applicable
sections of these documents. Tbe applicant vill also be
reguired to contribute $960.00 to the Town of VaiI parking
fund.
The staff feels that the conversLon of this area to
conmercial space wl-Il be an additlonal activity generatorfor the WaIl Street area and will improve the general
appearance of the area.
6
.rOF,E aRE EK *,,vE
f,r
fflq
t
.o
ti
$
u
f,
F ri
I
-l
I'I
J
I
!
'1
co
{=
s
OJE
V'
(rJ
c.)
co'r=
GI
OJE
f
ao,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Planning and Environmental Conmission
Conmunity Development Departnent
Septenber 10, 1990
A reguest for an exterior alterationVill.age lst Filing, 225 Wall. Street.Applicant: Anerican Angler/Anerican
fttt
cgpy
on Block 5C, Vail
Ski Exchange
I. DESCRTPTION OF THE REOI'EST
Approval of an exterior alteratj-on request is required for
any addition of enclosed floor area to structures in the CCI
zone district. The proposal incLudes a 96 sq. ft. groundfloor expansion of the American Anglerr/Anerican Ski Exchangeretail space, located at the south end of the arcade, of the
Lazier Buildlng on WaIl street. The expansion includes the
relocation of the store entry and the addition of two bay
windows to the store. A nen entry will also be added for
access to the basement area of the building. The proposed
infill area is currently an open exterior space and provides
access to other areas of the buildlng. The expansion is
proposed exclusively on private property.
rT. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The foltowing sumnarizes the zoning statistics for this
exterLor alteration reguest:
1. Zone District: CCI
2. Lot Area: 71318 sg. ft.
3. Site coverage: Existing: 41640
Proposed: 4.640*
No change in site coverage wLlL occur
because the space to be infllled is
already covered by the second floor of
the building.
4. Parklng: The applicant will be reguired to contribute
9960.00 to the T.o.v. parking fund. The
addition will constitute 32t of a parking
space. The parklng fee for 1 comrnercial
space is 93000.00. (96 sq. ft./3oo =.32 x
$3000 = $960.00)
III. COUPLIANCE T{ITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF COMMERCTAL CORE I
18.24.010 Purposes
The Connercial Core I District is Lntended to providesites and to rnaintain the unique character of the VailVilLage Cornmercj-a1 Area, with its mixture of lodges and
comrnercial establishnents in a predonlnantly pedestrianenvironment. Tbe Connercial Core I Distrlct isintended to ensure adeguate light, air, open space, andother amenities appropriate to the permitted tlpes ofbuLldlngs and uses. The district regruLations in
accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide
PIan and Design Considerations prescribe site
development standards that are Lntended to ensure the
nalntenance and presenration of the tlghtly clustered
arrangenents of buildings frontJ.ng on pedestrian ways. and public greenways, and to ensure continuatlon of thebuilding scale and architectural qualities thatdistinguish the Village.
The infill proJect is in conpllance with the purpose of the
CCf zone district. The addition will be an activitygenerator in an area which is currently void of conmercialactivity. The addition will not negatively affect the scaleof the building and wilL inprove the overall quality of the
Epace.
IV. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THIS PROPOSAL
The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan includes three
elements that establish the revies criteria for tlrisapplication. The first of these is referred to as the Guide
Plan which includes a number of sub-area concepts, many of
which identify potential areas for future development andother improveuents. Secondly, the Urban Design
Considerations e)q)ress the large scale, Iand use planning' and design considerations, and finally
archLtectural/Iandscape considerations which will be
revlewed by the Design Review Board, establish the criteriafor evaluatlng detailed design considerations of a proposal .
The Vail Village Master Plan also addresses specific goals
pertaining to the enhancenent of the walking experience
throughout the Village that must be considered in this
application.
fn addition to the Guide Plan and the Vail Village MasterPlan, traditional zoning considerations are also a factor ln
thLs proposal .
V. COMPLIANCE WITH THE T'RBAN DESTGN GUIDE PI,AN FOR VAIL VILI,AGE
lfhere are no specific sub-areas relevant to this proposaL.
VT. COUPLTANCE WITH THE I'RBAN DESIGN CONSTDERATIONS FOR VAIL
VILIJ\GE
The folloslng design consideratLons are a critLcal elenentof the Urban Design Plan. They identify the key physicalcharacterlstlcs of the Vlllage and provide the tools toassure that new developnent be consistent with thisestablished character. These considerations include thefollowing:
A. Pedestrianizatlon:
Tbe proposed addition will have linited inpacts on thepedestrian traffic flow because of its proposedlocation. The addition will add interest to thispedestrian area with the Lncrease in window area and
increased visibility of the entry of the store.
B. Vehicular Penetration:
Vehicular penetration or circutatj.on wilL rernain
unchanged as a result of this proposal .
C. Streetscape Framework:
Streetscape framework identifies two alternatives for
irnproving the pedestrl"an experience In the village.
These include the development of open space includingt
landscaping along pedestrian routes and the deveJ.opnentof infill conmercial storefronts along pedestriancorridors. While landscaping can provLde a softeningof buildings and a colorful franework, connercialinfiLl can provide activity generators and visualinterest to the pedestrian, according to thisconsideration. The proposed addition will relocate the
store entrance to the front of the shop and add two bay
windowE. A11 of the itens wilt inprove the pedestrian
experience by converting an otherwise unused space into
viabte conmercial area. In addition, the increased
transparency of the shop frontage will add visualinterest to the area.
D. Street Enclosure:
lhe purpose of this consideration is to maintain a
comfortable relationshlp between the width of streets
and the height of bulldlngs. The one story addition
along the arcade will have no effect on the street
enclosure of I{aIl Street because it does not increasethe overatl height of the building and although it does
encroach into the pedestrian corridor, the irnpact does
E.
not increase because of the proJectlng nass above. Theaddition will lmprove the existing condition by
Lncreasing the anount of retail busineEs frontage alongthe arcade.
street Edcres
There are no standard setback reguirements in the VaiIVillage. Rather, proposals are looked at with
relatlonEhip to the slte and the surrounding
developnent of the site to insure a strong street edge,
The addition wilL partlally fill an area voLd of
cornmercial activity al,ong I{aIl Street. The street edgeof Wall street will be J.rnproved with the continuationof the existlng building llne.
Building llelght:
Building height will be unaffected.
\tiews and lqcal Points:
The proposed expansion does not affect any adopted viewcorridors. In addition, the infill will have no
J.npacts on the lLne of sight fron either the top or
botton of Wall street.
Serrrice and Deliverv:
The proposed expansion will not affect the current
servLce and del.ivery patterns.
Sun/Shade:
There will be no increase in the shados pattern as aresult of this addition because it iE within theexistlng shade pattern of the building.
Architecture/Landscape Considerations :
lfhese deslgn conslderations are t1plcally the punriew
of the Design Revlew Board. The staff feels that the
detailinE and increased transparency of this corner of
the building will have posltive inpacts on the arcade
area of the buildlng. Also, the infill of this aPacewill lnprove the appearance of this area by addingvisual interest to the space.
The addltion will be renovl.ng 94 sg. ft. of brick
pavers whlch are consldered landscaping by definition.In order to remove landscaplng in the CCI zone
dJ-strict, sufficlent cause nust be shown by tbe
applicant or as specified in the Vail Village urban
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Design Considerations. fn otlrer instances requests of" thts nature have been required to obtain a landscapevariance in order to decrease the anount of
softscaper/hardscape landscaplng on site. This was
necessary because they were decreasing both tlpes of
landscaping and thus changing the ratio of hardscape tosoftscape. this tlpe of change requires a variance
because according to the definition of landscaping only20t of the overall anount can be in hardscape tlpe
landscaping.
In this application the amount of hardscape is
decreasing and actually naking the situation less
nonconforming in regard to the landscape definitionrequirenent. Therefore, we are not reguiring the
approval of a landscape variance for this application.
The staff finds that the application is consistent withthe vall Village Design Considerations. fn addition,the appllcation is consistent vlth the goals andpolicies of the Vall Village Master PIan. we also feeLthat the benefits of the project outweigh the impactsof removing the paved area.
The applicant has agreed to contribute up to $5oo forthe repalr of the paved stairuay located adJacent tothe buildlng. The staff feels the repair andinstallation of new pavers in this area is an
appropriate requirement to nitigate the removal of thepavers in the infill area. The Town of Vail landscapearchitect reviewed the project and reconnend the paver
treatnent as an improvenent needed in the area.
Below is a summary of the existing and proposed
landscaping as they relate to the total area of thesite*:
Lot Size: 7,3LB sq. ft.
Existing Landscape 1715 sq. ft. or 23.4* of hardscape
115 sq. ft. or 1.6* of softseape
1830 sq. ft. or 25.0t of the site
Proposed Landscape 1621 sq. ft. or 22.L* of hardscape
115 sq. ft. or 1.6* of softscape
1735 sq. ft. or 23.7t of the site
*Alley ways and areas between buiLdings which are not
accessible to pedestrianE and do not have any landscapedqualities have not been considered landscaping.
VII. REI.ATED GOALS AND POLICIES OP THE VAIL VILI,AGE MASTER PI,AN
GOAL #2: fO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRT AND PROMOTE
YEAR.AROUND ECONOMTC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE
VTI,IAGE AND TOR THE COIIIMUIIITY AS A WHOLE.
2.4 Objectlve:
Encourage the developrnent
conmerclal activity wlrereland uses.
of a variety of new
conpatible with existing
2.4.L PoIicv:
Commercial infill developnent consistent nithestablished horizontal zoning reg'ulationsshall be encourage to provide activitygenerators, accessible greenspaces, publicplazas, and street scape lnprovements to thepedestrian network throughout the Village.
The proposed infill is consistent with established zoning
and the existing uses of the area. The addltion willprovide interest and actLvlty to an area which currently
experiences linited activity'.
VITI. STAFF RECOI'IIiIENDATTON
The staff recommendation is for approval of the requestedexterior alteration. The revl-ew of the relevant Urban
Design Criteria and the Vail Village llaster Plan goaLs showthat the proposal is in confomance with the applicablesections of these dosuments. The applicant will also berequired to contribute $960.oo to the Town of Vail parking
fund.
The staff feels that the conversion of this area to
commercial- space will be an additionaL activity generatorfor the Wall Street area and rrill improve the general
appearance of the area.
lti
#e'\'to 1*"t =""o
I o
IIit.tIl'
I
.9
(5
OJT
+)rt,(tr
q)
co'.r=I
0JT
-!,
o(h
fl
H
ffiH
P?OJECT:
DATE SUit,IITTED:
COI'.i,IEIITS IIEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSALs
PUBLIC UORKS
P.eviewed by:
Reviewed by:
Con:rents:
POLICE DEPARTI4ENT
I NTEP..OEPARTIIENTAL REV I EW
DATE OF PUELIC HEARING
Revieved by:
Connerrts:
Date
i
't r.
..: j;
Revieaed.by:
Co;;,ents:
^l
I
I
Date
7 o
trrt v--- .'":,:
n1'q r!'- l, 81ggtl
IHTTS.OEPART}IENTAL REVI El.| !Lt. I' T'.V '' - - .. ' ,
PROJECT:
D.(TE SU3I.IITTED:DATE 0F PUBLTC *rO*rnC al . r0
Ccl'',i,1ENTS ttEEoED av: 3 . El .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
9UBLIC UoRKS
Revier,red by:0ate
Conr,ents:
FIRE DEPI.RTI4ENT
h,4 -'- <
Reviewed by: ///c G'# Dat E'z-7-5oeLJE.+.ry ./
POLICE DEPARTI4ENT
Revieved by:
Con:nerrts:
.
Date
' 'd.r'4't
.i_:
Reciggrorr DEPARTt.t:NT
Revle'.red by:
Co;;'entg:
Date
PUBLIC NOTICE trT;;Pe.a133
NOTICE IS ITEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Env iro nrnental
Comnission of the Town of vail lri1l hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the urunicipal code of the
Town of Vail on Septenber 10, 1990 at 2:00 p.n. in the town of
Vail Municipal Buitding. Consideration of:
1. A request for
Lots 5 and 6,
Forest Road.Applicant: Ron
an amendrnent to tlre approved access plan for
Block 7, vail Village lst Filing, !46 and L26
Byrne
2. A request for a work session on the Sonnenalp redevelopnent
and proposed Special Development District at 20 Vail Road,
Part of Lot L, 81ock 5-E, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: sonnenalp Properties, Inc.
3. A request for a conditi.onal use pernit in order to construct
a remediation system at the Vail Anoco Serrice Station, 934
S. Frontage Road. Legal Description as follows:
A PART OF lHE NEl/4 NEI/4 OF SECnON t2, TOwNSHtp 5 SOUJ!1,_RANG-E 8l WEST OF IHE SIXTH
CnixCipt MERtorAN,'DEScnrbEo ns FoLLows:'BEGINNINc AT THE PotNT _oF lNrERsEcrloN oF THE
Eeir-urHe oF sAto sEcloN t2 wtTH THE souTHERLy RrcHT-oF-wAY LINE oF u.s. HIGHWAY No.6.
Slio porNr BETNG 6s4.ls FEEr sourHERLy FRoM rHE NoRTH€rsr coRNER oF sAlD sECTloN 12;
ixelrcr wEsTERLy ALoNG IHE sournERr_v RtcHT-oF-wAy LINE oF sAtD HlcHwAY, A OlsrANcE oF
i+o rin, MoRE oR LEss, To I pornt oN THE EJST HrcH wAIER BANK o_F RED SANDSTONE CREEK;
rxir.rCi S'oUrnenl- , ALONG THE SINUOUSITIES OF SAID EAST HIGH WATER BANK, 200
rCET. UOAE OR LESS, TO ITS INTERSECTION WIIH THE NORTH HIGH WATER-BANK OF GORE CREEK;
rigr.icg EAsTERLv. ALoNc THE stNuouslnEs oF THE NoRTH HtcH .wATER BANK oF GoRE CREEK.
zci iEET, uonE bn LEss, To ITS tNTERsEcnoN wtTH THE Flsr LINE oF sAlO SECTIoN 12:
iHeNCE r.ionrHentv, ltoruc sruo rtrsr-r-rNE, 160 FEET, MORE OR LESS. ro THE POINI OF BECINNING.
Applicant: Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
4. A request for a minor subdivision on portions of Lots 7 and
8, Block 6, vail Village 7th Filing, LL1T E. Vail Valley
Drive.Applicant: Thornas Rader
5. A request for an exterior alteration and a landscape
variance on Block 5c, vail Village 1st Filing, 225 WaLJ-
Street.Applicant: American Angler/American Ski Exchange
6. A request for an exterior alteration in order to construct
30 sg. ft. expansion on l,ot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd
Filing, 510 l{. Lionshead Circle.
Applicant: Landrnark-Vail Condorninium Association
7. A request for a najor change to existing development
approval for the valley, Phase VI .
Applicant: Edward Zneimer
8. A request tlnena section 18.04.130--de-'inition of Floor
area, gross*sidential (GRFA) r 18.09. olnittsiaeResidential District density controlr 18-0.09o singlefanily District density control , L8.L2.090 llto Fanily
Residential District density control and; 18.13.080
Prinary/Secondary Distri.ct density control , of the Municipal.
code.Applicant: Town of Vail
9. A request to amend sections 18.04.360--definition of site
coveraEei 18.09.OgO--ttillside Residential District site
coveragei 18.10.llO--single Fanily District site coverage;
t8.L2. 110--fuo Fanily District site coveraget 18.13.090--
Prinary Secondary District site coverage; 18.14.110--
Residential CLuster District site coveragei 18.16.11o--Lou
Density Residential District site coveralte,' 18.18.110--
MedLun Density Residential site coveragei l-8.20.110--High
Density Residential District site coveragei L8.22.110--
Public Accommodation District site coverage; L8.24. 150--
Cornmercial Core I District site coverage; 18.26.L2O--
Cornrnercial Core ff District site coveraget 18 .27.O9O--
Comnercial Core IfI si.te coveragei 18.28.l2O--connercial
Service Center District site coveragre; L8.29.090--Arterial
Business District site coverage; 18.30.110--Heavy Se:rriceDistrict site coveragei 18.32. 110--Agricultural and open
Space District site coverage and; 18.39.190--Ski
Base/Recreation District site coverage, of the MunS.cipal
Code.Applicant: Town of Vail
10. A request to amend section 18.52.160--off Street Parking and
Loading Exemptions, of the Municj-pal Code.Applicant: Town of Vail
The applications and
avaiLable for public
Departroent office.
Eown of Vail
Connunity Development
Rrblished in the VaiL
infor:nation about the proposals are
inspection in the Conrnunity Development
DepartnentTrail on Augrust 24, 1990.
o
Ms. SheIIy Mello
Conrnunity Developement
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage RoadVail, Co. 81557
August 13.7990
Department
West
PABADTCU DESIGN
ARCHITECTUBE PLIINNINO INTERIOBS
! n,,t t" ,e*il
Rer American Anglerr/American
Dear Shellyr
This letter is addressing your25, t99O,
Ski Exchange
letter to Joey Tonahill on February
Joey now has a letter from the owner and president of the condorniniumassoeiation giving him permission for the proposed erq>ansion of the
American Angler/American Ski Exchange. Could you please rescheduleus for a PEC rneeting on September 10, 1990..
The reason for this delay was determining the value of the ercpansion
and how the new space would be leased^. If you have any questions pleasecall me at 476-5997. Ihank you for your patience and consideration.
Sincerely I t&*uErich HilI, Architect
ccr Joey Torrahil]
P.O. BOX ?81 VAIL, COLOBADO 81668 (soa)lzo+aez
Augtt'til: l0 '
l(.tu0
shel
'r'rrw n7ir SVail
Ir.'l Ur.nt
pi a'Hiil-nllq'qprlo. A!55oc.
l r,:Y )4r: l l.'of V,tiI [, lAnrrr
. Fr.ont.;rqr' Rd.
, (:o ft t 6i?
Uea r Ms . tlrr'.[ I rt :
Pleas,: t're -rrt'lvise'l l'lraL- thr) tt''rI t- sr ' ' 'nJ(lil:-'1:':'il".:,r,f;1'1.''1"'r'$ll*lI
"ppio*,.s or t.r,e,_:;,1;1.;1.,i'rf,rr,;i.il "Jl:l$ji:d.ljiil:;rl;;1;;;;;i. ,1r rhsr
tb' R,rbert 'l'. [a
Froperr.-v lry J,uz,.rr','r't.:ri,.nt , Amr,:f i"o,l"siii ixt:trartq''rAnierie'rrr Ani'l lor '
.rhe Associs!;i:l:1.^,,f,1;iiJl,lnol.lll*,,*ll-,'111.-!)''il!l:i::'i;'j'!lil.li"iilupon: I | . t)cl-()r'.
rhe A!rso(:ri{q,ron ,.t."Fii ii^p'J,.iri*g..pJ..,- ;;;;;i or'r,t;t1'"' ;rvr4r'rt\t': ot L!"t'
;iir#i:ii;:x;i'iilr,:t$"fr:":',"#*i+t:'l"sjr,i-', irjl'' iiY""::'i?fi"'\;
portion of i\trtet'tt'tn'"stti-g-icftantlt' t'fit' liid tr"rst"rnc'rrt c'rtl't'attt'r" sn'r tr
:f;."?l'f;*"t,,.11,1,:,.,iiLl i[i.lilll"lI-i:l:;i*l;:l-tl '!'llT":""'rr
st i'l Lrue ' '
11.".,,i,?,
n;;';,liii,i',:;;,,t;1;-l'i?.[',ir"''.]tr--l:ill,'i:.,.t1'lii;llliil'iti;
il;:i1"1;j:t;,lll;il;1i.",1,:.1",1"1!'l,llo"'.1.,,'n'ii':';';'J,',1'-ii'''f,:,i,'-ti,iv" "'v
d '' .i: ^ll
75 loulh lrontrge road
vall, colorudo 81657
(303) 47$2138
(3(xl) 479-2139
February 25, L990
Mr. Joey Tonahill
Anerican Ski Exchange
225 waLl St
Vail, CO 81557
otflce of communlty developmenl
Dear Joey,
I arn writing concerning your recent Exterior Alteration Request for
the American Ski Exchange. As you know, the Planning and
Environmental Commissions review has been rescheduled a number of
tirnes because the ownerls approval has not been obtained. r spoke
with Erich Hill on Feb 2oth concerning the project and we agreed
that the project would be removed fron the Planning Commissions
March 12 Agenda and would not be rescheduled until the ownership
issue is resolved. In order to reschedule the appLication for PEC,
we wi-11 need a written agreement between the appropriate owner(s)
which witl legally allow you to expand your shop into the reguested
area.
If you should have any questions concerning the application, please
feel free to contact me at 479-2L38.
Sincerely,
NA \] \\ a\f.)J"-t*\\^r \\\-s.\Lo
shelly il"Lr" Q'
cc: KPErich HilL
,{;'czl<d,
| 'zro'lo
Brondess-Codmus Reol Estote, Inc.
281 BRIDGE STREET . VAIL, COLORADO 81657
January 29, L989
Robert T. Lazier
P.O. Box 527Vail, CO 8L658
Dear Bob:
Concerning the enclosed public notice regarding expansionplans for the American Ski Exchange, I would like to refer-ence a relative section of the Condominium Declarationwhich Etates, "The general common elements shall be ownedin common by all owners of the apartment, office and storeunits and shall remain undivided, and no owner shall bringany action for partition or division of the general commonelements." (Section t0)
However, inasmuch as cotnmon elements were sold to one ofthe owners (#302) several years agto, a similar arrangementcould be worked out in this instance. If you would reimbursethe Association the going rate for commercial space (basedon two appraisals obtained at your expense), the abovereferenced section of the Declaration could again be waived.
Since Joeyts hearing is in two weeksr lou may want to movequickly on the appraisals.
Sincerely,
CMG
Encl-osurecc: .roey/amerj.can Ski Exchange
TOV PEC v/
REAL ESTATE (303) 476-1450 .
nTcrar!1r
^
Tta\itc I onn.rao
DENVER TOLL FREE 893-3101
\t/\fl . -Av la^a\ A1/\ ^1r|^
PUBLTC NOITCE
NOTfCE fS HEREBY GMN that the Planning and Environmental
Cornmlssion of the Town of, Vail wiLl hold a public bearing
accordance with Section 18.65.060 of the rnuniclpal code of
Town of Vail on February L2, LggO at 3:00 p.rn. in the Tosrn
Itunicipal Building. Consideration of:
IN
the
of Vail
1. A request for a rninor subdivision and zone change for Lots 4
& 5, Block 2, Bigborn lst Additlon.
Applicant! sable/Lupine Partners, Ltd.
request for an exterior alteration for the Arnerican Ski
on Block 5c, vailExchange in the Wall street Building
vilLage First rifing.
Applicant: Anerican Ski Exchangre
A request for an exterior alteration for Condorniniurn Unit #3
in the Gore Creek Plaza Building at 193 East Gore Creek
Drive, Btock 58, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Michael sanner/Piero Rivolta
4. A request to rezone a Speclal Development District for the
carden of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5, ValI Village Fifth
Filing at 365 Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G. HilI Fanily
3.
.VtA&w To Ap.l.,'
wrr:uT*Y+s
PUBLIC NOTTCE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that the Planning and Environrnental
Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in
accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the nunicipal code of the
Town of Vail on February L2, L99O at 3:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail
Municipal Building. Consideration of:
l-. A request for a minor subdivision and zone change for Lots 4
& 5, Block 2, Bighorn Lst Addition.
Applicant: Sable/Lupine Partners, Ltd.
2. A request for an exterior aLteration for the Anerican Ski
Exchange in the Wall Street Building on Block 5C, VaiI
Village rirst Fili.ng.
Applicant: American Ski Exchange
3. A request for an exterior alteration for Condominiun Unit #3
in the core Creek Plaza Building at 193 East Gore Creek
Drive, Block 58, Vail village First Fili.ng.
Applicant: Michaet Sanner/Piero Rivolta
4. A request to rezone a Special Developrnent District for the
Garden of the Gods on Lot K, Btock 5, Vail Village Fifth
Filing at 365 Gore Creek Drive.
Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G. Hill Family
5. An arnendment to Special Development District 4, Cascade
Village, to amend Area D, Glen Lyon office Building at L000
South Frontage Road West, Lot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: clen l-,yon office B1dg. - A colorado Partnership
6. A reguest for a height variance for Lot 3, Block 2, Vail
Potato Patchr Alpine Townhones IV.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
7. A reguest for an exterior alteration for a portion of Lot 1-,
Block 2, YaiI Lionshead Third filing; vailglo lodge.
Applicant: Craig Holzfaster
8. A request for an amendnent to Special Development District 23
and a parking varj.ance to aLlow for an office expansion, for
the Vail National Banlc Building at l-08 South Frontage Road
west, a resubdivision of part of Lot D, Block 2, VaiI Village
Second Filing.
Applicant: Vail National Bank BuiLding corp.
9. A reguest for a side setback variance for Vail Village Sixth
Filing, Lot 6, Block 2.
Applicant: Clinton c. Ames, Jr.
o
APPLICATION FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I
VAIL VILLAGE
out. lnpp'l i cati on----! ec-r--!!.!96 9
Date of PEC Meeting .ran- 8, r ggo
I. Planning.and Environmental Commissiori review is required for the a] terationof.an existing building which adds or removes any dnclosed floor a""i or
99!99qt_Ourio or the replacement of an existing building L0CATED IN THE CCIDISTRICT. FOLLOWING PEC APPROVAL, THE PROJECT-MUsT BE fEVIEWED BY THE ORB.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME 0F APPLICANT 4merican Angler and American Ski Exchange
ADDRESS ?25 tlaLL St. Vaif , Co.
B.NAME OF
ADDRESS
PHONE 476-t4??
AppLICANT,S REpRESENTATIVE Paradigm Design (drich Bifll
P.O, 7JI Vail, Co.
PHONE 476-6397
NAME OF OWNER(
SIGNATURE(S)
ADDRESS
LOCATION OF
ADDRESS
E. FEE $ 100.00
THE FEE MUST BE PAID
REVIEt^l YOUR PROJECT.
PHON E
D.PR0P05AL; _L.ESIL Ilazier Arcade Bldg. (blk. 5C,V. V. 1st
!'rI]-ng/
225 'NaLl- St. Vail, Co,
p^rl-.b|/ry_cr LqllL _ey n*"-S/L t'"/.^n
-d-
BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I,|ILL
II. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE hIITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO DETERMINE IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICATION |.lILL
BE ACCEPTED UNLESS IT IS COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUIRED BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE AN APPOINT-
I4ENT l'lITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION |.1ILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS
FOR YOUR PROJECT EY-D.EEMASING THE NUMBE]I OF COIIDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT
THE PEC MAY STIPULATE. ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED IiIITH BEFOREA BUILDING PERMIT IS ISS'MD'. THE FOI.LOWING IIUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. Improvement survey of property showing property lines and location of
building and any improvements on the land.
B. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subjectproperty INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND AND ACR0SS STREETS, and their mailing
AddTeSSeS. THE APPLICANT |.IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
),r./ / /
{U /12,,'"2,"
sc Mr* /A-4 {rv-l)
.br+
(-. \-
Y
sqNIr1)
OVER
-0w ,4/c4, ,A 4 //ap/
. 'l It t PAnADIcM DEsIcN
Comnunity' .Develop ement
fovrn of VaiI
75 South Frontage Roadvair co. 87557
Rer American Angler/Ameri"canWalI Street Building
Dear Betsyr
Dec. 18 1989
Ski Exchange Addition
*
*z
T't
V
$
\
c\
s3
F$
This letter is in response to your letter regarding my submittalto the Planning Comurission for the American Angler,/American SkiExchange addition. It is organized to respond to your numberedquestions.
1. The 100.00 fee was paid on Dee. Z, t989,
2. The owners signature was submitted on Dec. 7, L989.
3. The site coverage increase is 8? s.f. I will use the condo
map to show this and it witl be forth conj_ng.
, .'-\.A.D) ht6{1- ?e-o?gqf ot/rr.be@3
| 4. iThe Lodge 1/4 Gore'Creek Dr.\-_/,/Plaza Lodge 291 Bridge St. \ , rn c- --.Viilio-auiraiirg Zai-Eridi" st. ) Yktv, Stto+l
*--' Hong Kong Cafe 227 ilIall St.
c\::l 5, This is a retail conmercial addition which is in conformance. \' with the CCI zoning.
6. -.Uy statement' is organized to respond to the Urban DesignConsiderations.a. The addition reenforees the pedestrain nature of yrlall St.b. lhere are,no vehicle penetrations.c. The streetscape frameworkl street enclosure and street edgeare nai.ntained by the coniinuation of the building tine aiddisplay windows that exist on WaJ-J. St.f. The building height is not changed.g. The views are not changed.
Zoning Code Iterns
-Density is increased by 8/ s.f.
-No landscaped area is reduced.
-A parking fee will be paid.
-ArchitecturaUy the naterials of the addition complinent the
Lazier Arcade Building and the style of the bay windows addsinterest to the ecclectic nature of u{aII St.
1960 NEWTON STREET , DENVDA, COLORADO 80204 (sos)lzz-oroz
P.O. BOX 781 VAIL, CoLOBADO 81668 (sog)lze+ssz
t
rA '|
!t ! PARADIGM DEsIcN
ABCHITECTUBS PLANNINC INTENIONS
7. In regard to the question of comBatibility with the neighbothodd.
Most of the shops on Wall St. have bay windows t3pe displaywindows. They are of various architectural styles. This ecclecticmirture of styles brings lnterest to the pedestrain street tbatfronts these shops. An awning will shelter tlre entrance door.
There are many examples or this in the Village Core.
If you have any questions of need any nore infornation'.Sleaseeantact nel
Erich HilIArchitect
1960 NEWTON STREET , DENVEB, COLOBADO 80204 (soalazz+aoz
Slncerely,
P.O. BOX ?31 VAIL, CoLOBADO 81668 (gos)+zo-ossz
.*-,
75 goulh fronlage road
Yall, colorado 81657
(300) 47$2138
(300) 479-2139
ollico ol communlty developmenl
December 4, 1989
Mr. Erich Hill
Paradign Design
P.O. Box 731Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: American Angler/Arnerican Ski Exchange
WaI1 Street Building
Dear Erich:
We have reviewed your application for an exterior alteratj.on for
the above property. we will need the following as soon as
possible:
L. 5100 fee.
2. The signabure of the owner of the building, or if thet/' applicairt owns his space, his signature plus sondo association
approvat if one exists will be necessary. You can handle this
with a letter that has the signature.
3. An irnprovernent survey of the property plus numbers indicating
amount of site coverlge. (I€ is possible that a variance to
site coverage will be needed. )
/4. The names and. mailing addresses of adjacent property owners.
J5. A statement telLing how the proposal is in conformance wj-th
the purpose section of CCI .
J A. Statements telling how the proposal complies h/ith the VaiI
village urban oesi-gn Guide Plan re: pedestrianization, et aI.
A statement as to why this proposal is cornpatible with the
I
character of the neighborhood.
There will b.e a parking fee for the arnount of additional retailspace, I have calculated the addition to be 87 square feet.fn Commercial Core I, the fee is $3,000 per space with one space
needed per 300 square feet.
87 divided by
.29 x $3,000
300 = .29
= g 870.
This fee witl be due
You nay also arrange
The first installmentis issued.
50.
before the building pernit will be issued.for five installnent paynents with interest.
would then be due before the building permit
This looks like a real irnprovenent to the visibitity for the shop.If you have any guestions or conments on all this stuff, Erich, you
know where to reach ne!
Sincerely,
Planning Technician
J?O''r \
IBetsy Rosolack
3^^,)- Enrltz
/
,{/" *'t 7
tr-e-
S.
fr.tk1 n 1u*{.+_'/
t-t tF' -jiT- -
Al'-+; cu-au/.-
o.a c<.<
.a4-
{IL ..^- 5lr/ .4i *---
!
2q 3 ,ro, s-o 7
!"i':ro fuJlr
fl*-11 2.,4-4.-- ! YtV ^JZ--.<1
C ,c7'fJJ4 rtb
o-9 ---
Pu
/ 9"'u
^\ k'
r \utl { '^r''
^N (-A.'l 6l'hi8t
\,
out. olppl ication----.!ec. gil 9j!-
Date of PEC Meeting .rar'- B, lggO
TION FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
FICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I
VAIL VILLAGE
2?5 Natt St. Vail, Co.
I. P1 anning and Environmental Commission review is required for the alterationof,an existing building which adds or removes any enclosed floor area or
9!!g9or patio or the replacement of an existing building LoCATED IN THE CCIDIsrRIcr. FoLLowING pEc AppRovAL, THE pRoJEcr-MUSr eE ftrvtrwED By rHE DRB.
The application wiil not be accepted until all jnformation is submitted.
A. NAME 0F APPLICANT I\rlerican Angler and American Ski rJxchange
ADDRESS
B.NAME OF
ADDRESS
pHorur 476-1477
AppLICANT'S REpRESENTATIVE Paradigm Design (Erich ltillJ
P.0. 731 Vail, Co.
pxsNp416-6391
c.NAME OF OI.JNER(S)
SIGNATURE( S)
(print or type)
ADDRESS
D.LOCATION OF
ADDRESS
PROP0SAL: LEGAL Lazier Arcade Bldg. (blk. 5C,V. V- 1st
r'11rngi
PHONE
22 WatI St. Vail, Co.
PAID cK#
BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I,JILL
E. FEE $100.00
THE FEE MUST BE PAID
REVIEt,l YOUR PROJECT.
BY
II. PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE l,1lITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTEDTO DETERMINE IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED.
_NO
APPLICATION l'lILL-'BE ACCEPTED UNLESS^IT IS-COMPLETE (MUST INCLUDE ALL ITEM5 REQUIRED BY THEzONING ADMINISTRAT0R). IT Is rHE ApptrcRr,rls nrspoN5isiltry'ro Mnrr Rn Appornr-
MENT WITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL sUBMITTAL REQUIREM-NiS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION l,lILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESSFOR Y0uR PROJECr av-DE-f,R-eEtNG THE NUMBER or conorrior'iS or nppnovel-rHAi----THE PEc MAY STIPULATE. ALL coNDITIoNS 0F AppRovAL lluli sr coMpLrED wrTH BEFoREA BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUE_D. THE FOLLOWING MUST gT iUBI,ITTTTO:
A. Improvement.survey of property showing property lines and location ofbuilding and any improvements on the iahd.'
B. A list of the names of owners of all property adjacent to the subjectproperty INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND ACR0SS STREETS, and their irailing
AddTCSSCS. THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDREiSES.
OVER
t I CCI
III. Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following information:
A. -The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at a scareor I" = 20' sH0l,ltNG EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS T0 THE strE. Avariationr of the sheet size or scale may be approved by the communityDevelopment Department if justified.
B. The date, lgllh-arrow, sca] e and name of the proposed development
WITH ITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION sha'il be shown on the'site plan. '
c. The existing topographic character of the site including existingand proposed contours. This condition wi'l'l only be reqiired for-anexpansion area where there is a change of two fLet of jrade.
D. The existjng and proposed landscaping, patios.
E. The location of al1 existing and proposed buildings, structures, and improvements.
F. ,A title report to verify ownership and easements.
SUBMIT IN WRITTEN AND GRAPHIC FORM A PREPONDERANCE
THE PLANNING ANQ ENVIR,,IT{MENTAL COMMISSION INDICATING
IV.THE APPLICANT SHALL
OF EVIDENCE BEFORE
THAT:
A. THE PROPOSAL IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PURPOSES OF THE CCI DISTRICT.AS SPECIFIED IN 18.24.0'IO.
B. THE PROPOSAL SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGNGUIDE PLAN REGARDING:
' l. Pedestrianization2. Vehicle Penetration3. Streetscape Framewofk4. SLrcel Errslusure5. Street Edgeq. Buildins Height' 7. Views8. Sun Shade Consideration
MANY OF THE ABOVE ITEMS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY GMPHIC MEANS, SUCH
{I^ITFTC!qS, SIMULATIONS, MODELS (INCLUDING NEICHBORiNG AUiiDINGii,
PHOTOS, ETC.
IF THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A
DESIGN GUIDE PLAN, THE PROCEDURE
18.24.220(B).
C. THE PROPOSAL iS COMPATIBLE I,IITH
V. THE TOWN OF VAIL ZONING CODE FOR CCI ALSO DESCRIBES OTHER ZONING ISSUESTHAT THE APPLICANT MUST RESPOND TO IN I{RITTEN ON ENNFHiC TONN.
VI. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MAY DETERMINE THAT ADDITIONAL MATERIAL IS NECESSARY
FOR THE REVIE|..l OF THE APPLICATION.
VII. APPLICATIONS FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR.MODIFICATIONS IN CCI INVOLVINGMORE THAN 100 SQUARE FEET 0F FL00R AREA nni-or'rii nivirweo sEMI-ANNUALLy. THEyNEED T0 BE SUBMITTED BEFoRE THE FoURTH MoNDAv oF MAy 0R NovEMBER. rHi priH0LDS A PRELIMINARY RtvIEW seiston wITHIN zt DAys 0F THE suBMrrrAL DATE. A
PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE HELD WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE PRELIMINARY REVIEt,'l SESSION.
APPLICATIONS FOR THE ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT ADDS OR NEITOVTS NNVENCL0SED FL00R AREA 0F NOT M0RE THAN 100 SQUARE FEET MAy BE suBMrTTEo ni-inr
BEQUINTO TIME OF THE MONTH FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REVIEl.I.
FOR MORE SPECIFICS ON THE REVIEl.l SCHEDULE, SEE SECTION 18.24.065 A5.' -'--'
MAJOR CHANGE TO THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN
FOR CHANGES ARE NOTED IN SECTION
THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
-J
Prolect Name:
Project Applicatlon
M/iUi TRT.DT8S SIORE FRSNT
"rA/3/tro
Date
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and CillJCii 5IRUV[ 41i3-9531
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Addr€ss and Phone:
25 vJa i Srree -
Filing
Design Review Board
La/1i,/86Date
Molion by:
Seconded C J JI :by:
APPFOVAL DISAPPROVAL
f *. *,. i:,
Summary:
E statt Approval
' 196 Surnmit County Rd. 450
BRECKENRIDGE, COLORADO 80424
(303)453.9531 453-1855
nr'|,^ @7=, /{oe Cice.'- 'n /'
f(*vrtttrUO Tae,,utc , *d
MOUNTAIN TEES
P. O. Box 1016
Jno
D[Ierm],@
LETTER
/o- /3-te
subi".: ku/ gzD'' S/or<€H*,1 -
,Qg'*.ragz
7rre@ ,& a kt tru{} fuaae D6to,tl ruE
ftlnt 7Z.fiA7ZS Srozrs-Zaaruf ,+S Sd66e7nsA ry laue
fl No reply necessary
FoRfl rao-2 Avalable iiom 6i;i-i_7h., G.mrh.0la7l To!*lt{Ilt ItL FffE 1+@26.6tsC)
ilfP; i
i-
75 south lronlage ro8d
vall, coloredo 81657
Remode'l
october z, lggU 476-7000
Mr. Chuck Struve
Up iour Image, Inc.
P.0. Box 1016
Breckenridge, Colorado 80424
Re: Maui Traders Storefront
Dear Chuck:
The Planning Staff of the Community Development Department has reviewed your
Design Review Board submitta'l to remodel the store front of the old Gourmet
Cheese Shop. This project is located in Cormercial Core I zone district and
exterior alterations must comply with the design considerations outlined in the
Vail Vil'l age Urban Design Guide Plan. The staff recommends that you study the
Deslgn Considerations (enclosed) and reconsider your design as it relates to
the objectives of this plan.
hlhile you may proceed with your application to the Design Review Board, staff
would recommend you consjder design modifications in nesponse to the Urban
Design Guide Plan. As a part of their review, the Design Review Board will ask
you for a response as to how your design complies with these design
consi derati ons.
If you keep the present design, p'lease bring material samples to the meeting on
October 15 at 3:00 PM. Any changes to your design must be submitted to our
offlce by Monday, October 13th. In all 'l ikelihood, the Board will want to see
actual material samples at thejr meeting. Enclosed also is a form to comp'lete
for work done in Commercial Core I. You may bring this completed forn to the
meeting or mail it in time to reach us before the meeting.
Please do not hesitate to ca1 I with any questions you may have.
Si ncerel y,
Betsy Rosolack
Planning Technician
olflce of communlly dcvclopment
l.lrrr)l,i
( o, t) Gou t( ^'r(tfc t* t;t;t c-
ISr+"p/
A4 nai fr o/ez.z-,
T0:. Design Review Board Applicants for projects in CCI and CCII
FR0M: Department of Community Development
Development proposals in CCI and CCII are reviewed by the Design Review Boardwith respect to Design considerations as outlined in the urban Design Guide
!1an. These Design Considerations address various architectural ani landscapefeatures. It is the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate whethertheir proposal is complyj ng with these considerations. The Design Considerationsfor the Village and Lionshead are available upon request. P'l eas6 feel free tocontact Tom Braun or Kristan Pritz with any questions you may have.
Vail Village
I'1. Roofs /t// +
6. Landscape rr*"n trU/^
7. Service /f/ft
Lionshead
l. Hei ts and m 'I ng
3. Facad I s/structure
4. Facades - Tra
2. Facades #)9u.<-, /'A/filbdzls
3. .Ba'lconies MI4
4. Decks and Patios -/a
5. Accent Elements
ft/aaD /G/4ss
(over)
parency
MAUI TEADERS
EtfTEN,toRT R€'\I.ObCL
a-Aeqrf
+13,tf{
+ Stucco
"SAlfDSTd\rE'
$rsuucRer2ri06 cAli-$BA0 cANY0ri
N
$
nls
$
I
K
q
-J
Fo
ft
'J\
.A
APPLICATION DATE:e _ zl _tt"
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION I5 SUBMITTED*****
I. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-app1 ication meeting with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
determine if any additional information is needed. No application will be accepted
unless it is complete (must include all items required by the zoning administrator).It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to find
out about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a COMPLETE applica-tion will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the numberof conditions of approval that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditjons of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is issued.
DESCRI PTION:PROJ ECT*+A-
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address 7Lt Nm,c * " UrutT4fou UftU-.g. BLb6-
Legal Description
Zoni ng
Lot Bl ock Fi ling
C. NAME OF APPLICANT;
Address
D. NAME OF
Address
E. NAME OF
S i gnatu
Address
F. DRB FEE:
VALUAT ION
tD.%tbI b
ICKeL|(e7./ KLD6C ,
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE :
d.bau
-\!-*'v
The fee will be paid at
telephone {5345,3/
si-R.u vr
telephone {53-Z>tt
I t/eptt* f. €tlYe,QT
stake the site
be removedvisits the
the time a
FEE
ui I
00
00
00
00
00
00
bu ding permit 'is reOuestear)
frurts
teilpnone t63 -$3t
tJtrr(i'-,t-$ 0-$ 10,000$10,00i-$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ 0ver $1,000,000
.0
n
.U
n
.0
$to
$zs
$so
$1oo
$2oo
$3oo
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must
to indicate property lines and buildjng corners. Trees that will
should also be marked. This work must be completed before the DRB
site.
2. The review process for NEI,J BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetings
of the Design Rev'iew Board, so plan on at least two meetings for their approval .
3. Peopie who fail to appear before the Des'ign Rev'iew Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement wjll be required to be
repubi i shed.
OHNERS:
.bx@tb
4. The following items no longer have to be presented to the Design Review Board.
They, however, have to be presented to the Zoning Administrator for approval:
a. Windows, skyfights and similar exterior changes that do not alter the
existing plane of the building; and
b. Building additions that are not viewed from any other lot or public space,
which have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving
the addition; and/or approval from the agent for, or manager of a condomin'i um
associ ati on.
5. You may be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You should
check with a Town Planner before proceeding.
I. NEt^l CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL TO BE SUBMITTED
A. Topographic map and site plan of site containing the following (2 copies):
1. L'icensed surveyor's stamp.
2, Contour intervals of not more than 2' unless the parcel consists of 6 acres or
more, in which case, 5' contour intervals will be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunks with diameters of 4" or more
one foot above grade.
4. Rock outcroppings and other significant natural features (large boulders,
intermittent streams, etc. ) .
5. Avalanche areas, 100 year f1 ood plain and slopes 40% or more, 'i f applicabie.
6. Ties to existjng benchmark, either USGS landmark or sewer invert.
7. Locations of the fol low'i ng:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site showing size and type of
culverts, swales, etc.
b. Exact locatjons of all utilities to include exjsting sources and proposed
service lines from sources to the structure. Utilities to include:
cable TV sewer gas
Tel ephone water el ectri c
c. Property lines showing d'istances and bearings and a basis of bearing
d. Proposed driveways with percent slope and spot elevations
e. Al I easements
8. Existing and fjnished grades.
9. Al 1 existing and proposed 'improvements including structures, landscaped areas,
service areas, storage areas, walks, driveways, off-street parking, loading
areas, retaining wa11s (w'i th spot e1 evations), and other site improvements.
10. Elevations of top of roof ridges (with existing grade shown underneath) to
determine he'ight of building.
B. A statement from each utility verifying location of service and availab'i 1ity. To
be submitted wjth site plan.
C. Preliminary title report to accompany alI submittals, to insure property ownership" and all easements on property.
D. Landscape Plan (1" = 20' or larger) - 2 copies
1. Show the location of 4" diameter or larger trees,,other'shrrLibs_anO^iiatiVe plants thaare on the site and the location and design of proposed landscape areas w'ith
the varieties and approximate sizes of p'l ant materiajs to be planted. N
2. Complete landscape materials list.
3. Designate trees to be saved and those to be lost-
N0TE: As much of the above information as possible should occur on the site p1 an, so that
the inter-relatjon of the various components is clear. The landscape p1 an should be
separate. The existing topographic and vegetational characteristics may be a separate
map. The applicant must stake the site to show lot lines and building corners. Trees
that will be lost during construction must be tagged. The work should be completed
before the DRB site visit.
'E. Architectural Plans (1/8" = 1' or larger) 2 copies
. 1. Must include f1 oor plans and all elevations as they wi1'l appear on compietion.
Elevations must show both existing and finished grades.
2. Exterior surfacing materials and colors shall be specified and submitted for
review on the materials list available from the Department of Comr1runity Develop-
ment. Color chips, siding samples etc., should be presented at the Design Review
Board meeting.
F. The Zoning Administrator and,/or DRB may requ'ire the submission of additional plans,
drawings, specifications, samples and other material (including a model) if deemed
necessary to determine whether a project w'i 11 comply w'i th design guidelines.
II. MINOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS
1/ Photos or sketches that clearly indicate what is proposed and the location (site plan)
' of proposal may be submitted in lieu of the more formal requirements given above, as
long as they prov'ide alf important specifications for the proposed including colors and
materials to be used.
III. ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL
A. 0r'iginal floor plans w'i th al 1 spec'i fications shown
B. Floor p'lan for addition - 2 copies
C. Site plan showing existing and proposed construction - 2 copies topos
D. Elevations of addition
E. Photos of existing structure
F. Specifications for all materials and coior samples on materials list available at
Department of Cornmunity Development
At the request of the Design Review Administrator you may also be required to submit:
G. Statement from each uti'l ity verify'ing location of service and availability. See
attached utility location verifjcatjon form.
H. Site improvement survey, stamped by registered professional surveyor.
I. Preliminary title report, verifying ownership of property and lists of easements.
IV. FINAL SITE PLAN
After a building permit has been issued, and when the project'i s underway, the foliowing
will be requ'i red before any build'ing receives a framing inspection from the Building
Department: A certifjed improvement survey showing;
A. Building locations w'i th tjes to property cornersn j.e. distances and angles.
B. Building dimensjons to nearest tenth of foot.
C. Al 1 utility service ljnes as-builts showing size of lines, tyPe of materia'l used'
and exact locations. 2 copies
D. Drainage as-bu'i Its. 2 copies
E. Basis of beari ng to tie to section corner.
F. All property pins are to be either found or set and stated on map.
G. All easements
H. Bu'i 1d'i ng fIoor elevations and roof ridge elevations.
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF PRO
^-(""t/
The following information is required for submittal
Board before a final approval can be fiven;
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL
Roof
by the appf icant to the Design Review
COLOR
Si di ng
0ther tlall Materials
Fas ci a
Soffi ts
|.li ndows
tili ndow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ashi ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enc] osures
Greenhouses
0ther
LIST OF MATERIALS
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
Dnone:
PLANT MTERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botani'cal Name Common Name Quani ty Si ze*
for coni fers.
(over)
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*Ind'icate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate hejght
. 9LANT-MTERIALS: Botanical Name common Name Quanit.v Size.. (con't)
SHRUBS
EXISTiNG SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
Type Square Footaqe
GROUND COVERS
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. 0THER:LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) please specify.
UTILIfi LOCATION VERIFICATION
SUBDIVISION
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
ltre location of utilities, whether they be nain trunk lines or proposedlines, nust be approved and verified by the following utilities for the
acconpanying site p1an.
Authorized Siqnature Date
Mountain Bel I
I -634-3778
Nestern S'l ope Gas
Harry Moyes
Publjc Service Company
Gary Hail
* Holy Cross Electric Assoc.
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Vai I Cab'l e T.V -
Gary Johnson
Upper Eagi e Vai i ey tlater
and Sanitation Discrict
David Krenek
* For new consl
please fill ou1
attached sheet,
NOTE: These verifications do not relieve the contractor of his
responsibility to obtain a street cut permit from the
Town of Vail, Departrnent of Public Works and to obtain
utility locations before digging in any public right-
of-way or easenert j.n the Torrrn of Vai1, d buildj.ng permit
is not a street cut permit. A street cut pernit must be
obtained separately.
This form is to verify service availablity and location.
This should be used in conjunction with preparing your
utility plan and scheduling j.nstallations.
DATE:
LEGAL DEMTPTMN'LOI B]OCK
ADDRESS:
ZONE CHECK
FOR
SFR, R, R P/S ZONE DISTRICTS
Filing
OI,INER Phone
PhoneARCHITECT-
ZONE DIST
PROPOSED USE
LOT SIZE
Hei ght
TotaI GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks: Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course
Site Coverage
Landscapi ng
Fence/Retai ni.ng Wal I Hei'ghts
Park'i ng
Credi ts: Garage
Al I owed
(30)(33)
Prooosed
20'
L5'
15',
( 30) ( 50)
Mechani cal
Ai rl ock
Storage
Solar Heat
Drive: Slope Permitted
Environmental/Hazards: Avalanche
(3oo)(600)
(eoo)( 12oo)
(so)(1oo)
(2s)(50)
(2oo) (4oo)
Sl ope Actua'l
Flood Plain
Sl ope
l,'letl ands
Geologic Hazards
Corments:
Zoning: Approved/D'isapproved
Date:
Staff Signature
75 soulh frontage road
Yall, colorado 81657
october 2, fg$476-7000
Betsy Rosolack
Planning Technician
otflca of cornmunlty develoPment
Mr. Chuck Struve
Up Your Image, Inc.
P.0. Box 101.6
Breckenridge, Colorado 80424
Re: Maui Tnaders Storefront Remodel
Dear Chuck:
The Planning Staff of the Community Development Department-has reviewed your
Oliign R"uiEw Board submittal to remodel the store front of the old Gourmet
Ctt""i" Stop. ffris prJject is located in Cormercjal Core I zone district and
eitenior aiterationi mist comply with the design considerations outlined in the
V"ii Village Urban OeJign Guide-Plan. The staff recommends that you-study the
Oesign Coniiderations (inc'l osed) and reconsider your design as it relates to
the objectives of this Plan.
trthile you may proceed with your application to the Design Review Board, staff
woula -recommind you considei desibir modifications in response to the Urban
ii..ign euiae pfai't. As a part of lheir review, the Design Review Board will ask
yo, io. a response as to how your design comp'l ies with these design
consi derati ons.
If you keep the present design, please bring material samples to the meeting on
OitiU"" 15'at 3:b0 PM. Rny itrinbes to your design must be submitted to our
oiiii. by Monday, qctober igth. -tn all likelihood, the Board will want to see
actual miteli al-i"tpi"i at their meeting. Enclosed also is a form to complete
ion work done jn Coltmercia'l Core I. You may bring this completed form to the
meeting or mail it in time to reach us before the meeting'
Pl ease do not hesitate to call with any questions you may have'
Sincerely,
i*, rr. j .i i:ii :t i-j{..jii!.jii: i ti.. 1. .;i.. r; F{r tliFi i:;'-r-1,J
f,'., ii,, Ii{-]'". i .ti;Jl;
.1.:r1:; j.,.... ., L ill.. i.ii:{iil}i..1 t!.j. *:,:rii:!
nfrF-f'l::.l'!i.:lrr i:i .;;i ';i ,, .1.:rii:'i1:l
1..!f, Y{..ll.iiiir f. ilnirii::_ ,, 1 i..i;.. .,
I',, ij.. Fiil,-. .l.r..L,l
$i;:i:L{..t},..r.l:i.i!:i ] it;:il: . i i.i" i"ii.i4:;: +
{.i$. l'l'l l - i::. i'lL:. i,i .;
i.-ll\lI l- :1. -:i , l"JtiLL-
{.:{:L-i..!Fi:1;jl.i :i1-; i*-'l;.i.:
'jl.:{..i ::!i::i:nlI j::i::iI i..Ji.J l-t.l f:;;i:rt ;{-iiii:i-.
:;: i ii'ij[. l- j:]t l fi-j.) L l'Ji-i " .i:i5 t{,F)l-.!.-.
.-f J!.- *:r'i 1' f4i. i: J[:ir i.il;lf;rl,J ] f..l{.i 5i "
I l i:.. t-._r:-tijiI:. i:::J- tr-..r.:.
::1 | lr!t:a: i ., 1' Fi.l_ i._ ..
Review Action FL
TOWN OF VAIL
Date to- ll-1/
, Proiect Name: fl(lt
.'lP
ffiuildinsName: h>.r
Project Descri
Aorr. i,'^,1u /an?-,
fqch$dVOontact, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Projec{ Street Address:
r
Zone District (C f
Board / Staff Action
Vote:Motion by:
Seconded by:_
W4,
fl Disapproval
d(5tutt Aoo,ot
r freE
ox", /L /?- 11 DRB Fee ,*.*^ i Jg f/
ft01{?
s.-
r
,o
-.t
$
ul
R
$
I
t- lf--r
?' ,
Fte-sI.(^)oo
3 toucr
UJooo e2Nqws
CoNnrtuoos
f'r,lrgthr,r\.
Ef O,.'r. n4att9,$qAillt.
gtllvl,ftAsorJL\
k;*u-,
€aartrruorlg CAWAI^,
Ft*rs{uq FATIrEOqeeA,t ID /t*V[
FVtsc.r A \t6gref aVcI,fitbsga LtN-gtL.z"lg" w&
FrFar$.
Z(httt@4e@'
To Iv*V+ E.trtsttt\.
9oFFrT:
Tiq krooo Crtor^'q.
5fAru6o ro nnAtzH
Exrtftpq.
f lrre,uuqe4
qtA.lz
4\-ArD t^r\NOAr, b
6.0r,'r€9 Bof
+
zif
I
rt-5t'
9t*rpeo q?€hr
6 rn+ratt
FprT.
M^goNFnu^U*.
Pxlqf(.Corag.SoFftlr 1i.Q wooo
grgr^rt . 9.ll$!e0
To nt't(ctt Fxeliuq.-+
I
t"
FYt>1.
5ErjTtou .ftt9! f5d,q LJ rr.rooq,
1t,rtt= 1l-o
u g.zq.1+
"J3g?pf
icB{$tr
o
I
.,!c,.>
3
q
3
3
vto
2
Nlfrts
J
4.P
t$o
z4)o-
Ji:
9e<o
?P
$s
sss
s
\t!
is
4
vr43Ho<? €i
:e1J,^;
3 $,(
,,9-,'
\,i\',vr,fff _tc{
JEt