HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5 LOT 12 VAIL ROW HOUSES LEGALr." - t
,lJ
REPT131 TOWN 0F VAIL, COLORADO
@A/O7/9A O7:53 REEUESTS FOF II{SPECTION WORK SHEETS FoR: gl z/98
lt'
PAEE 5
AREA: CD
Activity:. 898-o2I@ 8/ 7/98 Type: A-l,tF Status: ISSUED Conetr: AMF
Addreee:
Locstlon: VAIL ROWHOUSE
Percel t 2101.-@A2-3I-0@7
DescrlptJ-on: REI{OVE E REPLACEAppllcant: E&GRO0FINEOrner: GALVII{ ROBERT W &Contractor: G & 6 ROOFING
on
Ocsl Uee:
SOUTH ROOF (BUR SA}IE FOR SA}IE)
Phone: 9706685552
t'tARY B Phone:
Phone: 97066S5552
Req Tl.met OLz@@ Cornments: unlt 12Items requeeted to be Inegected...
O@O9O BLDG-Final
oflng
Tlme Exp
Inepectlon Hlatory.....Item: AOSLO driveway gr:ade flnalItem: q6OL@ BlDG-Foottnge/Steel
Item : @@@2@ BLDG-Foundation/Stee1Item: @O32O PLAN-ILC Site pt-en
It,em: OOOS@ BLDG-FramlngItemt @@O4@ f * Not On FlIe * *ftem: OOOS@ BLDG-IneulationIteml 0@06@ BLDG-Sheetrock l{ailItemr O@OA@ * * Not On Flle * *Item: OO@7O BLDG-I{IEc.Item: @@@9A BLDG-FlnatItem: OO53A BLDG-Temp. ClOItem: 0@531 FIRE-TEIIF. CltrIten: OO332 P1{-TE}IP. C/OIten: CIO533 PLAN-TEI{P. C/OItern: 06537 PLAN-FII|AL C/OItem: OO538 FIRE-FINAL C/OItem: OO539 PW-FINAL C/Oftenr O@34@ BLDG-Finat C/O
"4 ,-,.-- !f
TOhIN OF VAIL
75 S. FROMTAGE ROAD
VATL, CO 91657
97 0 -479 -2L38
APPLICANT
CO}TTRACTOR
OWNER
DEPARTMENT.OF
NOTE: THIS PERM]T MUST
ADD/ALT MF BUILD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PERMIT Permit, #r 898-O2l_0
'Job Address:
Locat,ion. . . : VAfI_, ROWHOUSEParcel No.. : 2101-og2-31_OO7Project No.:
St,atus. .
Applied.
Issued..
Elq)ires.
G & G ROOFING
P O BOX B].7, FRISCO COG & G ROOFING
P O BOX 817, FRTSCO CO
GALVINROBERTW&MARY
ROLLING OAKS FARM ROUTE
80443
8 0443
-trt
68, BARRINGTON IL
Phonel. 97Q6685552
Phone: 9706685552
5 0 0r_0
TOV/Co DeDescript ion:
REMOVE & REPLACE SOUTH ROOF (BT]R SAME FOR SAME)
Occupancy:Tlpe Construct.ion:
Ty"pe Occupancy:
Valuation:
Firepl,acc Informahion: RegtricCed:
4,950
#Of ca6 ApplianceE:*Of tlood/Pallet:
r hereby acknowledge that r have read this apptication, fi1led out in fu1l Ehi infornaEion required, compretsed an accurate ptotpran' and aEaEe lhac all the informaiion provided as required ie correct.. r aEree !o cor,Pry lrith chc informaEion and proE. pran,to conply wieh alr To n otdinances and atate 1av6, and to buird Ehis sElucture accoraling to the ToBn,B zoning and subdivj.Bioncode6, deEign rewiew approwed, uniform Building code and other ordinances of the Toen applicable ther:eto.
REQUESTS FoR fNSPECIIoNS SHALL BE MADE T,r.lEI.tly_FOUR HoURs fN A.D\IANCE
Send Clean-Up Deposit To: c & c ROOFfNC
Cfean-up D
approved
amount
date
Add Sq Fr:
$of Gae LoEs:
Bnilding-:---5 95,00 R.sEualant Flad Revietl,--> .OO ToCal caLculaEed F€e€_--> 2s9.75Plan Check---> 61.75 DRB Fee----____ .00 Addi€ional Faes___--_-_-> .oornveatigati'on> 'o0 Recreation pee-_--------> .00 l'ota' pemic Fec--------> 259.75wi]'1ca11--.->3.o0c].ean-uPDepoeit...-.-..>1oo.ooPa}tenEs-----.--..-..-.->
*,*+,*r****i+**_."...._.]:Til.iili_:;;;;;;;;;;;;:."..,....',::l;11...,...?iH:T.:yi;;;;;:;;;;;.;:....__......;::...
rleqi .05100,,B9ILDING-DEP,ARTMENT- pepr: BUrr,DrNG Diwision:97 /ze /Le_eq^cU+B_r{r_E_ _AaEiijii; AeFR cHARLTE DAVrsfLem: O54OO PLANNING DEPARiM--EIIT-- -:"*-" -..neFe: PI,ANNING Division:07 /2e /Lee9. CHARLTE- -AEEib;;' EijFn u/a :II,em: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMEN1 -, DepT: FIRE Dj-vision:97 / 2e / ree-8^cH4Rl_,IE-_4siloii; AppR N/Aftem: 0s500,puBLIC WORKS--- .. Dept.: pIIB WORK Division:07/29/1998 CIaRr,rE "Ac-ilon: AppR N/A
-.---"*'-*'-.---
see Page 2 of this Document for any conditions Lhat may appry t.o this permiL.
ISSI]ED
07 /29 /1998
08 / 03 /1_9eB
oL/30 /L999
DEPARTMENI OFTOWN OF VATL
75 S. FROT.ITAGE ROADvArL, co 8l_557
970-479-2L38
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST
ADD/ALT MF BUTLD
COMMUNITY DEVEIJOPMEI{T
BE POSTED ON JOBSTTE AT ALL TIMES
PERMIT Permit. #: B98-O2i-0
Job Address:
Location. . . : vArL RowHousEParceI No.. : 2L01_-082-3L-OO7Project No.:
P O BOX Bt_?, FRISCO CO 80443GALVIN ROBERT W & MARY B
ROLLTNG OAKS FARM ROIITE 68, BARRTNGTON
Phone: 9706685552
Phone t 970G685552
rL 600L0
TOV/Comm, Dev.
Status. .AppIied.
Issued..
E>rpires.
APPLICANT G&GROOFING
P O BOX Bl_7, FRISCO CO 80443CON:IRACTOR G & G ROOFING
OWNER
Description:
REMOVE & REPLACE SOIIIH ROOF
Occupancy:Tlpe Construct.ion:
Type Occupancy:
Valuation;
Fireplace Information: Restsrict.ed:+Of Wood/Pallet:
REQUESTS FOR INSPESTIONS 6HA],L BE MADE TWENII-FOUR HOURS fN AD!?NCE
Send Clean-Up Deposic To: G & e ROOFING
approved
amount
date
Add Sq Ft:
#Of eas !096:
r******a*t* FEE SUMIlARYBuilding-----> 95.00 ResEuaranE plan Revi6r_-> .00 Total catcutated Fees--_> 2s9.tsPl,an check---> 67..ts DRB Fee---__-__ .00 Addirional Fees__-____-_> , .ooInveatigation> .OO Recreation Fee-__-____-_> .00 Total permit Fee--__--__> 2b9.75wilr call----> 3'00
:::::-::-:'"t"tt--------> 1oo'00 palarents-------- 2se.7s259.75 EALANCE DUE--- - -
rtem: 05100 BUTLDTNG DEPARTT4EN:I_ Qgpt, BUTLDTNG Division:97 / 2e / :-eel^cU+BiJ_E- -AEEi?;iii ADFR cHani,re DAi, rsrrem: 0s400 *ql_,lqlNJlue DEFIiii.MsNr-- --bepe: pr,ANNrNG Division:97 /29 /+998 CHARLiE-'-AEEj_ffi, -i^i- .- r-iiem;'.05660_rg!_oenaFifiEiir, :::: :i: Depr: FrRE Division:07 /2e /1,ess^cU+lEtE-_ ria-ii;ri; AppR N/Af rem: ossoo^pu8lfS wb.RKs*'' Depr.r puB woRK Divisj_on:07/29/L998 CHARLTE "[l-t-ion, AppR N/A
see Page 2 0f this Document, for any conditions t,hat. may appry t.o this permi-t.
DECIARATIONS
r hereby ackno'ledge Ehat r have lead thi. application, filled ouE in fuLt the informatj.on required, completcd an accuraLe p.r.otpLan' and atate thac all Ehe infornacio,t p.o'ri d.a ae requi,red i6 co-'ecE, r agree Eo compry wiEh Ehe infohation and lrlot. p1an,to cohPly *ith a1l ToHn otdj nances and staEe I'aws, and to buir,d thid structure according Eo the Town,E zoning and subdivisioncodec' desiEn review approved, uniform Bui.rding code and other ordinances of tshe Toirn applicable thereto.
ISSUED
07 /29 /L998o8/03/Lse}
0a/30 /ae9e
(BrrR sAME FoR sAME) Clean.up Degrosit Refund
4, 850
#Of Gas Appliancee:
o
********************************************************************************
CONDITIONSPermit #: 898-02 j_0 as of OB/03/9B Stat,us: TSSUED********************************************************************************
Permit.Type: ADD,/ALT MF BUrLD PERMIT Applied: o7/29/L998Applicant: G&GROOFING fssued: Og'/}3'/LggB9706685552 To E>rpire: 0a'/30'/L999
Job Address:Location: VAIL ROWHOUSEParcel No: 2t0L-092-31-007
Descrj-ption:
REMOVE & REPLACE SOUTH ROOF (BUR SAME FOR SAME)
Conditions:1. FIETD INSPECTIONS ARE REQU]RED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.2' ALL PENETRATTONS rN wALLs,cErLrNcs,AND FLooRs ro BE SEALEDWITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERI.A,L.
I'AITCEL # I
Dix'IEt-11@PL
, APPLfCATION I,IUST UiJ TILLUD OUT COt',lPLllTllLY Oll IT IIAY I'IOT BE ACCEPTDD
Af -r,,.^!r,.^,r,.r^r.r {"*,r***t * rt * * rt *:t rr * * rt * * tr t( * }t * * * Jr '
ti(* * * |t * t * * rt rt * * rt * Jr Jt lr * ir rt :t rt * >t rt rt tr * 't * I'EIII'IrT rllFolu'lATlol',J Ji * :t * * * ff * tt !t * tl * lr d
fs ;x1-nuirclinv [ ]-plunbing [ ]-ElecLrical I J-Meclranibat t l;ot]er;-- ,-
Job l{ane: Galvin Residence Job Address: -Lle-!4fjj
Architect:Address:Ph.
roof onlY. Install a BURGeneraL Descriptiells Remove -&Dispose-of So'facins
same as prevaous
Worlc Class: [ ]-Nelv [ ]-AlLeratiorr [ ]-Additional
NurnLrer of DweIlj-trq UniLs;l.lumber
1x 1-Repair [ ]-Other
of Accoruuodation UtriLs:
1lp1ber apd Type of l"ireplaqes: Gas Appliances- Gas Logs- Wood/Fellet-
qfl
,!bt,t l, tr * rt,t rtrt Jt rt rt* * * rt rt rt rr rt t! ri rt rt r! * tr rt * rt * rt ri rt VALUA'ltf ONS * * it ?t tt tt tt tr lt tr * tl tt ** * Jt tt * rt tt?t ** fr tt !t * Jl trlr t'*
fQJ- ilut"ott": -$---4-95-0*- BLItcrRrcAL: $- otIIER: $
;;;;;;;;PLUI"IBrl,tc: T-=.--- I'IECIIAI'IIcAL: $- TorAL: +-_---
$,f
Iid* * * * * * * * r*t * )t Jt rt it t Jk,rrtt t itrt*t rtt rt CoI,l I'IlAcToIl INl.'ol4ntlol't rt rt * lt /r tt tt * tt 't tt tr * * tt * * tt
'r
tt * tr * * * * *
{r ta6rtieneral ConLracl-or: c & G n"oti"gl--rnc. ----
--iO 'Iown of vail Reg-'^ti-l*'z4s--'
Atltlress: P.o.Box 8171 ffi Pllone Nurnber: 668-555-2-
ElecLrical Conbracl-or:
rt tr tr rt * * * * rt * tt * t! * * rl * t tt rt tt rt :t 'Jt )t n rt :t * :t rt tt
BUILDING PERMIT FI!tr:
PLUMBII'IG PEIIMIT Ftrtr:
I'IECIIANICAIJ PEIU,III' l.'EE 3
EII'CTRTCAL IEE:
OTIIEIT I'YPE OF IIUE:
DRB FEE:
TovJn of Vail Reg. No.
Phone lilutnber:
'l'owr-r of Vail
Phone Nuutber:
Reg. No
'l'own of Vail Reg. I'lO.
Phone Nutnber:
IIOR OFFICE USE * tt rt tt Jt rt rt * * tr J! rt * tf * rt tr * * tr rt * * tr rt * * tr * t rt
]]UILDII{G PI,AN CIItrCI( FBE:
PLUI,IBII'IG PLAN CIIECK F'EE:
I.IIC}IANICAI, PLAN C}IECK TI'E:
RECI{EATION FEE:
CLEAII-UP DEPOSI'f:
TOTAL PBIU,IIT FEES:
BUTLDTNG:
STGNATURE:
zol'{Il{G:
SIGI'IATUII,E:
Addross:
Plumbirrg
Address:
Contracl-or:
Mechanical Cortl-racLor:
Address:
VALUATIOI'I
G & G Roofing, Inc.,Box BlT,Frisco'co 80443
t,
CLEAN Ul' I'EPOSIT IItrIIUIID
TO:
FT{OM:
uATll:
nE:
o sEMOtlANpuM o
/\LL COI'11'RACI'OHS
TOWN OF VRtt- t'utlt-lc wont($ DEpARTffIEI{T
rilAY 9, 1gg4
wiiLr.t'n i'puBLtc lvAY PrnMlr' l$ REQUIRED
Date: -.. :7-7.i:?t - - ,,pubtic way pernir":frfr" ire regartJirlg lltc tleed lor a
!s,
L/
t/
/t
l'
1)
2)
YES
ls lhis a new residence'?
ls cjeniolition worlt being perlonned
lhal requires tlte use of llre right
of way, eassntenls or public propelly?
ls any ulilitY wodt needed?
ls llie drivewaY being rePaved?
ls dilfcrent acccss needed lo sile
ollter than existing drivewaY?
ls any drainage work beirlg done
aflecting tho rightof way, easctllents,
3)
4)
5)b
h
l/
{
c)
or public ProPellY?
7) ls a "Flovocalile lliglrt Of Way Pe rntit'
. recluiredi'
8) A. ls lhe righl of way, easernenls or
public properly to be used lor staging;
. parking or fencing?
B. lf no lo BA, is a Parliing, slaging
or {encing plan roquired by Cr:rrrnrunity
Developntelttt?
ll you answarad yes to arry of tlrese cluesliotts, a "l)ublic way Perrnit" musl be obtained.
'pubtic Way l'cinrit" ;rppriicatiotts fnay be oblained at tlte Public Work's offics or at
Contmunily'Dcvelopntetrl. llyou ltave atly cluesliotts pleasc call Charlie Davis, lho I own
of Vail Conslruclion lnspeclor, aI4-/9-2158,
I have read alld allswcred all tho above
-dl,l,n l'
esti0ns.
Job Nams Contradictr's Sigrtaluro
:i.r I
't tl
luwtt ti llill
?5 sorrtlr lronlage load
vail, coltuado 0165/
(3oJ) 479-2133 or h79-2139 oltlco ol comtttutrlly devcloplttettl
TO;
Fltol'I:
DATIi:
SUI]J IiCI':
ALL COI.I'I'ITACTO}IS CUIU{EI{TLYL RIIGISTEII};D I^IITII'IIIE
'l'ol,,lll or vAIL
Tot'/l'I of ViIIL PUDL-IC l'lonl(S/coMI'IUl'iITY DIIVIILOPMEI'IT
M RCII 16, L9BB
CotJSI'RUCIIOI{ PAItliIl'lG & IIATIIRIAIJ STOI1AGE
1:lease sl-op by the Tor.rn ofa copy. Thank you for your
In sununary, ordinance l'ltr. 6 sl-al-es thaL it is uttlavrful for any
pe;:sor1 t:o IiLl-t-lr, l-rerch or deposil- atry soi1, rocl<., sand, debris
or tua.Ler,LaJ., inclucl.irrg traslr dunrpsters, 1:ortable toifets and
r,iorluuerr vehicles ui,)ol1 ally s1-reei:, sidewallc, alley or public
lrlace or any por"'t-iorr l-liereof . The riglrt-of-way on all Town of
Vaj.l slreel-s anrJ roatls is a;rproxituately 5 f b. off pavelnent.
1'his ortlilrance r'rill be sl-ricLly ettforcerl lty Lhe Tovrn of VaiL
Public lrlorl'-.s Delrarl*nrerrt:. l)ersotts found violating this ordinance
rvill be qJiven.r 24 Lour rrriL'Lc'n noLice to rentove said rnaterial .
Itt the evenl- 1-he person r;cr trotified does noL comply wiLh the
trot-iue within the 2,1 hour tiute specified, the Public works
l)epart:nerrt uitl" renlove said naL.er:ial al- l-he expense of person
noLil-'iecl . 't'he prc.rvisions of tlris orditrauce sltall not be
aplllical-.rle to consl-rucl-ion, ruaitrtenattce or repair projecLs of,
arty sLreel- or alley or any rrtilities .in bhe right-a-way.
To review Ordinarrr:e llo. 6 i.n full,Vail lluil-ding llepar{-ruerll- to obbairr
cooperal-ion olt this uatter.
(i.e. conLractor, owner)
ackno
on/I{ela
o
tttwn n uil!
75 souttr Itolllsge road
vail, culor a rlo tl 105 /
(303) 4t9-2l3tl ot 479-2Lli9 olllco ul coltttrtuttlly devololtrtlcttl
I.'UILDING PII{I'iI'I ISSUAIICE I'II'IE FIIATIT
ll' Llris ;rcl.rrr it r-crlrrir.es il IOtvlt nl' Vail f-irc Dcpurhrtent.Approval '
ii,11 ii,."ti't (l)ubl iLl llur'l<s) rcyierv attd apprgvul, a Planttittll DelrarUttcttt
r"ui",u or' lleal l-[ L]e;rapLrtrerrt rlcvietv, atul a t'evig'r by L[e Buildittg
i.rupuri,,ru1t, the cstlrrrirlerl Lirrre for a l-ol.al revietl trny take as long
as tliree week'.s .
Ali cgtttrttct'r:ial (largc ot'stttall)arrd all lttultr'-l'arrrily pernrits will
lrave Lg 1'ullult Llrr: abuvr: lrerrLiuncrl trtax jtttttttt rcclu iretncltts. Residett t'jal
arrtl strtal I projccLs sltgulti tallc a lt:sser atttuutt t oF titrte. llowever, if
res idr:rrLiai r.ri' srrral lci' Jrt'r-rjec Ls irrt;lact tlte vur iuus above tttetrLiutted
deltarhrrerrts ll itlt r.egdrtl Lrr rrecessaty rcv icl,t, tltcse ;rrojects nny
al so take tlre tlrrce l'tccll llcrictd,
[vei.,.y a.l.Lerrrpt rvi'l ] be rrratlc by Llris dcp;rrLtttcttt Lo expeclite tltis
porrni L as s.oon as pcrssi bi e.
I, Lltc' uridcrs igrietJ, utttlet'stand tlrc platt cltecl< procedure altd tittle
f rarle.
Srfj't
a
N-Harje+ -e [)ru jec l" l'lalne
)f /-xr-7*
/'*uutu UutT-5rc-u tia s tur:ireill rr'ilnhu
Culuttutt i ty DeveloptrtettL Uclrartntcttt'
REQIIEST 3OR VARIANCE:Vail Rowhouses, unit 12
Nature of Variance:
Enelosing an existing first floor r,reck area by glassing
the southern expanse with floor-to-ceiling therrnal-p?ned
panels to gain a passive solar advantage. By rnoving the
glass out from under the seeond floor balcony, this gains
the only solar collection area available to the unit since
the majority of the glass is on the north; the east and
west being blocked by adjoining uni_ts.
This will coinciCe wlth a complete exterior overhaul and
upgrade of the rnit including a planned adrlition of southern
facing skylights over the entry area and the seconri floor
living room for the same solar gains.
fhe area of concern is four and one hal f feet deep by seven-
teen feet wide (4'5n x I7') or a total of seventy-six anrl
one half square feet (26 I/2 sq..ft.).
By the inclusion of heat absorbing materials 1n this area,
its existence can helr to offset the rrthrcrwawayr overhead.
expense of ever-increasing utility costs during the majority
oi the year when the unlt is unoceunierl.
Planning and Environmental Commission
July 23, 1984
I :00
2:00
2:45
3:00
pm
pm
pn
pm
1t
2.
Site Visits
Work session on A & D Building at the site
work session on vai'l Ath] etic club Hotel condominium conversion
Public hearing
Approval of minutes of JuIy 9, l9g4
Request for revisions to the Bonne vue earth-shertered housing
Bi:l:.1 on-Lots.4l, l?.r.43 Lionsridge ririns i uri-or-iiii-0,urocK r, Ltonsridqe Filing 4 to redesign the housing units.Applicant: Reinf6rced eaittr Compinv "
Request for a setback variance and a concurrent density controrvariance in order to encrose an eiisting tirst rtoor a6.[-.""uwith-g1ass on unit'r2, vair Rowhousei i[ los East Gore creek Drive.Appl icant: Nel son King
Request for exterior alterations dnd for a conditional use permit forthe Sitzmark Lodge in order to cevatop-cor*""iiiui ipii.-ior[n of the'lodge and to put a new p]iza-w:irr'i'ifiiirr.ing pooi and rooftop gardenabove the cormerciar spice. nppr'iianl: siizmark looqe-- --
5' Request for exterior arteration in commerciar core II inr order toremodel the sunbird Lodge buiding. Appricant: --sunoira"Loog"
J.
4.
!\) \.' '
r$* r
s,
H-H"t-
$g$
j
I
I
a
I
AI\,s
ST
d
'-'.
,:itj.,.,,Ft",a .:r. l,
T0: Planning and Environmental Conrmission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: August 8, .1984
SUBJECT: Request for GRFA and side setback varjances for UnitVail Rowhouses to construct a glass enclosed addition
square feet. Applicant: Robert Galvin
varl ance
The
title without srant of speili-TETIJGgE
12 of theof 170
DESCRIPTIOii OF VARIANCES REQUESTED
As.the Planning and Environmental commission may recal'l , at the last meetingthis application was tabled by the applicant to-enable him to revise the apilicationto increase the^square footage of the proposed enclosure. The enclosure pibviously
was 761 square feet, and it is now revised to be l0 feet by 17 feet repreientinga total of .|70 square feet. The applicant feels the variances are jusiit.iea
due to the fact that it will result in a substantial solar gain for-the unitand does.not negatively impact adjacent properties. The vaiiances requestedare similar to the Bridgewater variance lrairted by the Planning Commiision onMarch 12, .|994. Howevei, it should be n6ted this-variance reqiest a.llows theexisting first level wal] to be extended l0 feet to the south, whereas Bridgewaterwas restricted to a maximum of 6 feet.
CRITERIA AND EINDINGS
review of Criteria and findi Section'18.62.060 of the Munici al Codeot uonrnun tv Deve recommends denta I o ues
upon t actors:
!q 1'tlrich rel ief from the strict or Iiteral inte retation and enforcementoTasregulqtion i t neaesGFv io-ach-ieve ati b t.y and uniformitof trea amonq s vicinitv orn f,ne vrcrnlty or to attarn the o ecc] ves o
As.noted_above, the request is similar to the Bridgewater request, however,this applicant is askirig for a larger enitJiea greenrrouie iaciltion. no iiinificantimpact upon adjacent properties is-antiCipated ir tne vi"iance is approved:
s
The staff feels that the granting of the variance at this point in time representsa.special privilege. He are curiently working on a proposirt to attow smali ---'
additions to dwelling,units even though it woilld techniirally represent a varjancesituation under today's regulationi. "we teet ttrat ii ii im"porthnt to respectthe develoment of the zoning code amendment by not proceedihg with approvingvariances which, under the ixisting regulatio-ns, shbuld not 5e given'irntil ihe
eatf-z- B/B/84
proposed regulations are in p1ace. To a certain degree, granting this variance
wou'ld subvert the efforts of the staff, PEC and Council to arrive at a new system
to deal with these types of proposals. Our current schedule indicates final
passage of the new amendment by the Council in early 0ctober.
,r 'l'
The effect of the requested variance o
Public safety.
The proposal would most likely improve the accessibility to sun, 1ight, in the
dwell'ing unit by providing a greenhouse enclosure on the south e'levation. There
are no other effects upon the other factors in this criteria.
Such other factors and cri ria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed
var't ance,
FiNDiNGS
:
I!19 f'lannins ald En tne fqllowins findings beforegrant'ing a variance: '---
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilegeinconsistent with the limitations on. other properties clissified in the same district.
That.the granting of the vapiance wi'll not be detrimental to the public health,safety, or welfare, or materially'injurious to properties or improvements in thevi c'i ni ty.
That the variance is wamanted for one or more of the following reasonsr
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified reguiationwgy:ld result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical irardship inionsistentwith the objectives of this title. -
There.are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable tothe site of the variance that do not apply general'ly to other propeities in thesame zone.
The strict or literal 'interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation" ryout9 deprive the. applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of otfrei piopertiesin the same district-
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Deve'lopment Department reconmends denial of this variance, as weDe premature and would represent a special privilege to allow the
1i*3I:=leu.loping a system to equitably aliow thii type of additioncommun t ty.
The Communityfeel it would
variance while
throughout the
o
o
- - -E-NSI Er+va.;ror.i I ru7 Caxpror.t ttJlur- ap L{*,ti l?
MEMORANDUM
T0; P1 anning and Environmental Commission
FR0M: Community Development Department
DATE: .J uly 18, i 984
SUBJECT: Request for GRFA variance and side setback variances for unit l2of the vail Rowhouses to construct a glass encloiid-adoitiiin. -
Applicant: Nelson King
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant i5 requesting variances to enable the construction of 76.5 (4.5,y17'1
square feet of additional floor area to unit 12 of the vail Rowhouses. ThA''- ''
applicant feels the requested variances are justif.ied due to the fact thatit will result in substantia'l solar gain to ihe unit to enable him to moreeconomical]y maintain the unit due t6 its second home nature. This variance
f!r9:t.is very^similar to the Bridgewater variance on the unit directly tothe west. The Bridgewater request was granted March .l2, l9B4 by the p'linning
and Environmental Commission.
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria gng Finginq!, S ,,
Consideration of Factors
As mentioned above,for unit ll on the
by the Planning and
the proposal. The
properti es .
VaiI Rowhouses. This request
Environmental Commission with
request basically presents no
was granted this past winter
some minor alterations to
negative impacts upon adjacent
of this variance wouldin place. As the PEC
the GRFA variance problem
time schedule for this
premature to begin granting
this request 'is quite similar to the Bridgewater variance
The de ree to wh h relief f the strict or lfteral inte retation and enforcements necessar.y to ac qYc a un't tonnor lreatment among sites in thElicinJE or to atta ntheo ectives of thistrtte without grant of special pTT-vilege.
The staff still feels at this time that the grantingbe a special privilege due to the requlationi still-]s- aware, the staff is working toward a solution toof no impact type proposals. t.|e have established almportant zoning code revision, but feel it would be
approvals before such an,amendment is approved.applicant consider tabl.ing tne requeit ui,tif tn*currently would final ize ihe zoni,ig-amenJm"nt-UV
KrNG J- 7/18/84
|,le would request that
amendment is in place
late September).
the
(the schedule
e effe t of the uested varlance on ht and air, distribution of lation,tran ation a raTt 1 C acilities c Tac ties and utilities
The proposal would most.likely'improve the accessibi'l.ity to sun light in the9l:llilg rljt bv providing a g"eehhouie enclosure on ttri i6uth erevation.Inere are no other effects upon the ot-her factori in inir-iiiteria.
FINDINGS
The Plannin and Environmental Commission shall make the followin findinqs beforeanance :
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilegeinconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
Illt-the granting of the variance will not be detrimentat to the public health,s9tgt1, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imprbvementi-in-ln.vi ci nity.
That the variance is wamanted for one or more of the foilowing reasons:
The strict or Iiteral-interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulationwould result in oractical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistentwith the objectives ot irrii'iiii;:-'' -
There.are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or condjtions applicable tothe site of the variance that do not appty gene"iiiv-to-iin"r" properties in thesame zone,
The strict or literal -interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulationwould deprive the applicanl or privlieges enSoyed by-the owners of other propertiesin the same district.
The Communityin time. Weuntil we mavAt this poi-nt
privilege due
Development Department cannotfeel it is prudent to postpone
aoopt legislation to allow usin time, we feel the grantingto existing regulations
support this request at this point
variance requests of this natureto grant small GRFA variance requests.of this variance would be a special
]nninS and Environmental Commifn --
August .l3, .|984
I I :00 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
t.
Site visits and work session on Vail lloods (Highland park)
Publ ic Hearing
Approval of minutes of .Ju1y 23 meeting.
Request for a setback variance and a concurrent density controlvariance in order to enclose an existing first floor d-eck area withglass on Unit 12, Vail Rowhouses at 303 East Gore Creek Drive.
Appl icant: Robert Galvin
3. A request for side and front setback variances to construct a garage
and to enclose an area underneath a deck on Lot 12, Block l, V;il '
Village 6th Filing. Applicant: Richard Heiler
4. Request for exterior alterat'ions and for a conditional use permitfor the sitzmark Lodge in order to develop commercial space'southof the lodge and to put a new plaza with i swimming pooi and rooitopgarden above the commercial space. Applicant: Siizmark Lodge
5. Request for exterior alteration in commercial core II in order to, remodel the sunbird Lodge building. Applicant: sunbird Lodge
6. A^request to amend Ordinance 30, Series of ]t9l7 to increase the numberof units allowed to be construcied at 770 potato patch Drive, from30.plus_an employee unit to 36 plus an empioyee unjt, located onLot 6' Block 2,nair porato pat;h subdiviiioir. Appiicant: Ed A.smith
7, A request for exterior alterations in commercial core I for the HillBuilding on Lot L, Block 5c, Vail village lst Filing to add secondfloor residential space. Applicant: gTanche C. HiiI
8. A request for accommodation unit condominium converions for the' Phase II addition of the Mamiott Mark Resort at 7.|5 west Lionsheadcircle, Specia'l Development District 7. Appl'icant: M-K corporation
9. I lgqy":! for accornmodation unit condominium conversion of thevail Athletic ctub at 352 E. Meadow Drive.-=Appii;;;ir" rn" vait ctub
l0' A^request for a minor subdivision in order to reaiign the lots linesof Lot 6, Block S, Vail Village tst Filing, whiih cintiins ttreSlifer Building. Applicants: Rodney E. Siiter and John McBride
2.
TO BE TABLED
1.:l . A request for aa garage on Lot
12. A request, for a
on Lot 3, Block
front and side setback variance in order ro constructlI, Block C, VaiI das Schone. Applicant: Travis Beckley
rear setback variance in order to construct a garage1, Gore Creek Subdivision. Applicant: Richird oiiiinq
I
Application Da
I.
APPLICATION FORM FOR A VARIANCE
This proced.ure is required for any project
The application will not be accepted until
requesting a Variance.
all information is submitted.
A. NAI'IE OF APPLTCANT I,J "i ' ' ' i lC- t rt
ADDRESS
B. NA.ITE OF APPLICANTIS REPRESENTATIVE Nelson Kin
aponrss poBox loo3, Vail, O pHoNE 4T6_1714
.NAME 0F 0[/NER (type or pr.int)
SIGNATURE
D. T,OCATION OF PROPOSAI
PHONE
c.
ADDRESS #I2 Vail Rowhouses, ,Ol E. Gore Creek Dr.
T,EGA]. DESCRIPTT0N lot block Filing
F.
FEE. $r00.00, :ee1o k//>s-/.r /,:i fr.i::_:.,J,., I'nn,,,4r,/)A list of the names of owners of al1 property adjacent to thesubject property ana tnelr mait-ini aooresses.
Millcreek Court B1rCg., /"Arthur Rishop,
302 Hansen F,aneh Rd.
Vail Athletic Club, 352 tr. Meadow DT.
Mountain Haus, pO Rox TT4g, Vall
**!"1 'trr"
/r, - )' t' r
'* "t-t - c-'/.,--ty: / 4/"" r J rartr,_ ., r/,../
L-.,) ,t;, jl ';fu:'1r!;;"" 't '/''-7
Itcf r'f
application form lr . variance page 2
II . Four (4) copies of the following information:
A. A stattrre regur;iii!l+if"il3uf'3ii";'::;F:ri:.ini1l?l:iffi; Ii"xiilsl;ssaryphysical hardship i".""!ill"rrt wiln trre ouiectives of this titlethar wour-d resuli F;il';;;i.t-oi-iit"iJr"iit"rpretation and enrorce_ment of the specifiea reguiation. ---l
B' A site-plal .slowing all_existing and proposed, features on thesite' and on aa:oining'"Ii!".-_r.t-necessary, .pertinent to the vari.ancerequested, includins iit" bo'ndaries, reiuiied. setbacks, buirding*$::t""" and heilhi"]-iJplgraphv and physical rearures and simirar
c' such additionar material_": rr" zoning administrator may pre-scribe or the applicani-*v ""u*it periinJrri to the apptication.
III. Time requirements
The Pranning an. Environmental commi_ssion meets on the 2nd and4th Mondavs-of each-;;;il:" An applic.lior,-"ith rhe necessary accom_. panying material rnust be--submittei r-.""---ro."ks prior to the iateof the meeting.
Applicatio' OuJ
APPLICATION FORM FOR A VARIANCE
I.This procedure
The application
is reguired
will not be
for any project
accepted until
reguesting a Variance,
all information is submitted.
A.
D
NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRNSS
PHONE
NAI,IE OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
c. .NAME 0F OWNER llif\,/ /
)(.srcxaruRE rei
ADDRES 't /6
LOCATION OF PROPOSAT
ADDRESS
6,1,/
'/-L (,oNn&z-/zt- le36la
D.
LEGAI, DESCRIPTION Iot
E. FEE. 9100.00
F. A l-ist of the namessubject property and
block
PAi D'%t. \
of owners of aII Dr(.)nar+t, ^r-i-^u',.i" r.irjrit.fr;:rl"Tpertv adjacent to the
''"t'P
I
,ji
,r \ l-l
Planning and Environmental Commission
August 13, 1984
PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Howard Rapson
Gordon Pierce
Duane Piper
.lim Viele
ABSENT
Scott Edwards
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
Kristan Pritz
Tom Braun
Larry Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
The
1.
2.
meeting was cal led to order at'l ;30 by Duane
Approval of minutes of July 23 meetin
Piper, chairman.
Viele moved and Rapson seconded to approve the minutes as wr.itten. Vote was 5-0.
ose an
j cant:
3.uest side and front setbac k vari ances to
ET
nstruct a
age
and to encl ose
for
an area u on o occna cant:
Peter Patten reminded the board that this item had been tabled from the last meeting!:!3!t",the applicant had;il;gd [;s-request,by increasing the square footage of theproposed enclosure from 76* to 170 squard feet. Patten-siited that ilre siaii-suggesteo-that.the applicant wait uniii-fi'l-coil,iunity Development Department staff, the counciland the PEC a*ived at a nen' tysi"r io-aeai wiifi ifi.r.-tvi!, of proposars.
.Ngl:on.[jng: representing.the applicant, stated that the applicant did not want towait with the chance of tissing'i:tte uuiioing-season this year. pierce suggested thatthe applicant do the.deck aoov6 now,-ina apptv when the-nlw regulations weie in place{lultlg,:_.ll'::^lllt F,dyi;-nii"ir,""r""iinl. i[.ni.- iie meruers fe.rt that it wourd!9 I orant or special-pii"ii"ge'i; ;;;,i-;#';ril;iJ. ,iiErlTiili lij"rilil.,l.:8ll:o
Kristan Pritz explair:1-!!rl ttre,applicant wanted.to build one.singre-car garage onthe east side of'the property and ib aia an aadiii6n i6'tie-"".,rErng nouse prus asolarium hallwav and hew'dec"ts ana-iu.[ing in front of the house in the existinqright-of-wav' itrts pu"iing-i"ei""u5-iii.oved by the DRB in september 1977 and iouldpartlv alleviate the'probldm-oi-.u.i illttns in the street (and public works feelsthis wou'ld also make it easier'to-pio[-in" ioiol. -priii""eiiewea
the rest of the memo.
ntrol varia
J 8/13/84 -2-
Piper asked for an explanation of the final landscaping, and Richard Hel 1er, theapplicant' stated_that on the street side there wouia be terraces with flowers andsl'ryb:: Nelson King, vlhq is the .. on the project, stated that he wouiO wort<with the Town engineer., Piper felt that the current berm-and tanaiiiping wii'i nlcebuf,fer' and so it was.important to know what the new landscaping woulh Ue. ifre heightof the terraces was discussed and Patten read Sections tA.5b.OZ0 A & B. leiion'King repeated that it would also depend upon what the Town engineer iequireo.--
iele mov and Raoson seconded to a rove the variance uests because the ranti ne var ances not const u a qran o
we are to
specr a
ropert'i es or
e, woutrimentatotheasaety, or rovementsnthevtand t var ance was warran AUSE re were exce ons orextra
ot
rcumstances a ica etotnes teoft var't ance at not aenerar properties same zone.vote was n
Pierce forwarded to DRB the concern that there shou'ld be morebecause he felt the scale of the buildings was not accurate.
accurate drawings,
No. 4 on the agenda was to be considered last.
5.uest for exterior alteration in Commer ial Core II in order to remode'l the
)unD l ro Looge bul ld'i nq.
van moved and lierce seconded to table this item until the I icant submitted
i cati on one proposa 0r eac vote was
nar-Io
Tom Braun explained that the staff was recommending tabling until the applicantre-suhnit.a complete application. He added that t[e appliiant had left i phone
message that stated that if he did not get to the meetiirg, that a work sesiion be
schedul ed.
6.A
ET
to
uest amend Ordinance 30 Series of 1977 to i rease the number of units
us one emplo.yee unit
Kristan Pritz explained the request, and stated the applicant's rationa'le for therequested 6 additiona'l units. She presented project iomparisons between the
approved original project and the proposed prbject including density, site coverage,nelght' setbacks., parking, site p1ans, landscaping, and architecture. Pritz then
used variance criteria.to.analyze the proposal and'l isted other properties zoned byordinances that limited the nuirber of htlbwed units, adding that lhe;e properties couldmake.similar requests to increase thejr number of a'l lowed units if jt ciluld be justifjed
by the site plan. Pritz stated that the staff reconmended denial because to grint
the.request would set a precedent, because the revised site plan did not warrint theadditional units, and it'would be a grant of special privilege.
r5r- 7/?.3/84
o
Viele stated that he prefeffed the orig'inal proposa'|, and felt that this proposalwas not much different from conventional pro]rosits. He felt thatlooked contrived. He.suggested returning' to' the originai-iroporit or else!:ins.a single. pitched roof with sod. viele fett th;t ihe'ptanter woutd ca.llattention to the project.
Rapson added that he had stated concerns similar to vie] e,s at the last meeting.Jamar felt that al the concerns were retatiu., pointin;;d;hu;"in"-bJ""i"""'=was.comparils th!! proposal with the first desigir, wt'"n"tire board shouid rememberwhat could be built on'the sites. Jamar then siiieJ irrai iots Al and A2 couldhold.13 unjts, Lot 6 courd have-a:soo-iquare iooi-jupiex,'ina A3 was altowed2 units bv ordinance resardress or *'e ai;te: i; d;[i;d.a'tnut this sitedesign was much better ihan developing ihe'tnree-pirleii-withori an'iniegrateodesign. He added that no one wantbd io'see a project thai wasn't successful.
P'iper replied that the board understood, but were disappointed in the newproposal. ware stated that the cost faitor was not th!'onry concern, butthat earth covered roofs presenteo-iong-term mainieninie-p"6utems. He addedthat thev also felt that more glazing iould prese;i;;;rfie;ciar appearancerather than residential. Pierie teti ttrit the-piJient-p".poiui *ii-in imiiovementgYlI !h" proposal presented at the previous meeting. Hb alaeo that from adistance' the onlv advantage of the'sod roofing wai in ioJiing Uown on-gre project.Pierce felt that ihere wouid be no-oiiierence in appearance with the new proposalwhen driving down the street. He added that there was a much better chance forsuccessful marketing with the newer proposal .
Patten reminded the board that the issue was also the one of the 40% slopeas well as the SDD.
Pie and Pi nded to the revised housin des i theance, as we d5
to oc onsri d4 from Sinqle Famil
the
Res nti a
uest to rezone
Cl uster uest forstras tor tsnor subdlv ston ln o e 4 to nto one.
3.uest f a GRFA variance nd side setback variances for Unit l2 oftaass enc
Peter Patten that t rd had visited the site. He reminded theff was_working toward a solution to the GRFA varianceact type proposals. He-asked the applicant to table this
e
we
to
ac
r
board that thA p
problem of no-\muntil the ordin)e was passed. Nelson King, the applicant, stated that theowners wanted totheir requests tothe Bridgewaters,
simply curious to
the . Bridgewatersto EaDte to g/13.
know how the PEC would react to the King pioposal , sincead been asked to reduce the size of ureir're;;;;i: kin!-asrea
Ailuw iluw rne prL woutd react to the King proposal , sincehad been asked to reduce the size of their'rei:r"it. kinq-
go ahead now, and added thii ttre oirheri-wiihea to reviie- -
increase the size of the enclosure. Craig Snowden, refresent.ingneighbors of Unit 12, stated that the BriigewateiJ-weii ---'
favor ai nst abstai n i n
ses to cons
5-0 in favor of tabTiiBgpson moved and Viete seconded to litie to'8/13. Voie was
-vLhce ^ e.-{'/.(t Pez-
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:AppeaI of Lhe Planning Commission decision to deny arequest for a GRFA variance in order to build anexterior addition to units 12A and 12 B of the Vail
Townhomesr resub of Block 5t Vail Villaqe lst Filinq.Applicant: Robert Galvin
On September 91 1985, the Planning and Environmental Conrnissionvoted to deny the GRFA variance and approve the setback variancesfor this proposal. The vote was 5 in favor of the motion with 2opposed (Briner and Hopkins). The applicant is requesting to addadditional GRFA to both the lower unit and upper unit located onlot 12 of the vail townhomes. rn order to construct this additionra GRFA variance is necessary as well as east and west sidesetback variances. The planning commission and staff denied therequest for the GRFA variance due to the fact that there isreaIly no physical- hardship concerning this reguest. rt was alsofelt that to grant this reguest would be a decision which wouldbe inconsistent with the limitations on other properties withinthis same zone district. The staff and planning Commissionrecommended approval of the side setbacks as there are extra-ordinary circumstances on the site due to the lot layout which donot apply generally to other properties in the same zone. ft isvirtually impossible to add any type of an addition within thevail Townhomes without requesting a setback variance due to theunusual- 1ot layout. In generalT the Planning and Environrnental.commission felt that the additions would greatly improve theproperty. Howeverr the PEC hras unable to approve the GRFAvariance, as it would be a grant of special privilege. please
va rt ance.
oln
Town Council
Community Development
October 1r 1985
dt x, o.4
Donovan askeci whatit was to increase
as to the physical
mounted and folded.
Viele moved
PECo
main reason was for requesting thefeeling of "outdoors" in the main
ns.of opening doors. The reply was
9/11/8s -2-
alteration, Armstong saiddining room. Piper inquiredthat the doors are tract
irqto
the
the
mea
The' staff, presentatiol'was.giverl.,by'Kristan'Pritz,wlro stated-that the,staff r j:,i..-.,reccn]menoeo approval t'cr the sioe setback variance ., clenial of the GRFA vari ance.
fyll..:!9:.ber9, repr€senti!9 the applicant, gave a presentation on beharf of theapplrcant. Discussion fo1'lowing cbhcernin! trow-oioir;;;;-4 appiieo-io-irrii'p"oposur.Gordon Pierce-spoke in an attemit i;-i"ip "*piiin inl-ripricant,s intent anci theproposal's relationship to the broinanCel pipei point"i-ort that grdjnance 4iloes not allow for multi-famity clect enclosures. 'He siuteJ that orjginally thePEC wanted mutti-family exteriir-i*oo.i. iJo".rr"Jl h;;;;;", muttj_family exter.iorremodels were exclucieci from the ordinance. Donovan-felt that there was no difference
letygen this.proposal-and the sandiione'zo proposat. Affeldt fett that thjs wasanother special privilege case. vieie felt'thb iirr. wur-.identical to the oneat sandstone 70. He peisonaliy did-not nave J-pioli.r'*iill'the proposal anci feltit was a good one for'the.commirnity, -vi"t. felt the pEC needs clear directionon the issue of murti-famiry cteck Lncrosures from the corniii.
was 7-0 in
and Schultz seconded to a the ues t the staff memo,Vote
5.uest for GRFA and setback variances in order to construct additionson Units and l2B o the Vai Townhouses at Lot ubofBvait \/ilt lst Fitinq.pi i cant;rt vtn
l::::o:::,:.t:":::g.ll! efnr iiati;;-;;-;.bi.J i,i.ii;i;;iy.""p:ri!i'!;.ili: if,!i
?i:t;,,y:xlo bs^::jlli:l.,ii llg TH;,it'.;;pi;.;il;;'il;;;"; ;;";;." ;;:;:: ilthe future. Donovan moved and AffplJf-c:rr rvqe'uIr qPPsqt Eq urr Lrre dgensa lr
rha rrnlo , ,". cili ni tetThe vote was 7-0.
AITC Idt movecl and Viele seconoed to a rove the setback variance because of theexistinsetbacand to deny t on gro u ncl s ot specja ri v i I evotewas 5 in favor anci Z fBtiner and Hopkins) oppos
6.uest for side rea It
a wate rcourse
acio ition on
setbacknit 5 o
vari ances in
at I lown
orcie r
CS nf q
tott
cons ruct a oecK an
res u 'lvls onofB ock pplrcant:T ri tzker
l3:'.:l:J,:,i-:"1::::ilj19 seyellr of the owners of other townhouses, felt thatll?"t:::1.::: :':::1lli6n courd t"i"ii-tn" proposui Jr. tJ-iii."iiii'riSi"rili
ll::^ll:: l?';l^sllll1l.:?i1dl 9r;Fti
'Fuit.t iiio-iilui"nu";,;i;""il;i.X'in'u
il:::;3i: ::.*:-::'fflti1:T,:::::l;!l'l piii;e i;e 'tili ;;,i;";;.:;l"ii'5 jlF' icat jon.
nd
ubfi;vq
.Vr
TO:
FROUs
DATE:
SUR]ECT:
Plannlng and Environment Commi ss]. on
Communlty Development Department
September 9, I9B5
A request for a GRFA Varlance and east and westvariances in order to build an exterior addiUnits l2A and IZB ot the Vail. TownhomesrResubdivision of block 5 a part of Gore CreekVaiL VilLage, lst filinSAppLicant: Robert GaJ.vin
se tba cktion toLot 12,Drive,
The appti.cant is requestrng to add additlonar GRFA to both the-tower unit and upper unit rocated on Lot lz of the vail Townhomes.fn order to construct th].s addtEron, a GRFA vartance Ls necessaryas we-l I as east and west side setback variances. Mr. Galvin or.rnsboth units. He is proposing to add 227 square feet to the .r.owerunit and L44 sguare feet to the upper unit. The J.ower unit,sacldltional square tootage wirr be- used to expand a basementbedroom, as we_Ll as the first LeveL livrng room, dlning room,krtchenr bunk room and ski. storage area. The upper unit squaretootage vri-r.l be used to expand an exlsting bedroom and to redesigna starruray- si-mi.Lar eo most units in the vai-l Townhomes oevel0p-
T:tt,_ this particular project is also over the aLLorved GRFA rlrthe Lot. Given HDMF zoningr the totat allowed GRFA is 1r763square feet. The exlstrng GRFA ls 21't32 square feet. At thrst1T" t!" t-'o units are already 969 square ieet over the cRFAallowed tor thj.s property. With the new adortionsr the GRFA wilLexceed the all.owabLe by 1r34O square feet.
The setbacks for the Iot are al.so effected by th]-s proposaL.HDMF z_oning requires 20 foot setbacks on arl side-s of thi piop..-ty. Presentlyr the north and south setbacks meet the ZO tootstandards- However the existing east and west setbacrs aiecompletely encroached upon leavi.ng a o foot setback. The currentproposaL will not effect the north and south setbacks. The eastsetback Lri'11 be encroached upon an addit.l.na1 1g feet and wr. 11create a (J foot setback. The west setback will be encroachedupon an additional r.2 teet and r.r111 create a u tooc setback.
Zonins Sta trstics
HDMF Zone
Lot Area = 2,93g s.f.Total GRFA Allo\"red = 11763 s.f.
Loerer Unit 1656 s.t. 227 s.t. (includes 25 s.f.deduction for ai.rlock)
GRFA
Existing GRF'A
Proposed
GRFA Including
Addr. tion
l8A3 s. t.
Upper Unit 1076 s.t.L44 s. t.
37L s. f.TOTAL 2732 s.f..
Total Existing 2732Total A]l.owed -I763
Amount over
aIlohred +969
Total Proposed + Existing 3t{J3Total. Al. lowed -1763Totai Amount ove r
GRFA with Additions L340
SETBACKS: Requj.red 20 ft. on aLL sides of property
Existing Setbacks: East: 0 ft.
West: O ft,North: 29 ft.
South: 20 tL. (16 ft. from front
Ience iGiven This proposal:
East: Encroaches an additlona_l
l8 ft. creatLng a 0 ft.
se tba ck
West: Encroaches an additional
, LZ ft. creating a 0 ft.
se tba ckNorth: unattected
South: una f fected
APPLICANT'S REASONS FOR REQUESTING THESE VARIANCES
"rn regard to units 12A ancl ]28 ot the vail To\rnhouses, we arerequesting additiona-t square footage by means of exterror addltionand alteration. Firstr in order to achieve the addlti.onaL squarefootage as ottered under ordr.nance No. 4, minor exterior alter-ations $roul.d be necessary. Although ordrnance No.'4 suggeststhat add j. tronal- square footage can only be added to the interiorshe-lL ot a multi-family unit, Tor^/nhouse units ]2A and L28 have nopracticar j.nt.error space to en-Large upon. secondry r the Gal.vi nfamlly has indlcated to us that they are very much interested incompletely upgradlng thei-r two va]-t rownhome unlts. The unlts
have signiticant vlslb11ity uri.thin the v111age core and anyef f orts to upgrade the unl ts r./ouid be beneticial to al.l and workwould invo]ve ner"r exterlor finishing and detalLrng to both theexisting and changed portlons of the Townhouse unlts. The vail.Townhouses have uncrergone numerab-re unr.t remodels ot similarnature through the years and there certarnly appears to be anenough. variety to aJ.l.ow exterior changes wi tnoul- a.rtering theprolect's architectural character. " (r,-etter Augusc 6, 1985 )
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Consrdera tion of Fa ctors
ach].eve c tibrltty and unif^ :orml. cy ot treatment amonq sites in
qranr. of special diivTlEEEl
ree:Theexter1ora1terationstotheupperand.].owerunlls should not have negative impacts on adlacenE uses orstructures in the vicinity. fn generil, the exterior arteratlonswill serve to upgrade the structures and should have a positiveimpact on nelghboring proper tie s.
%: Both the east and L/est si.de setbackswrrl oe elfected by this proposal. However, O foot setbacksarreacly exist on both sides of the property. The aod. t.10ns wr.r1create a Larger area that encroaches into both the easc and westsetbacks' Hoereverr these encroachments will noE nega tiver.yimpact neighboring properties as they are basicar.r.y lnflrradclrtions to existing paeios and decks.
#:ordrnanceNo.4wasdesignedtoma}CeiteaSierror appllcants to add GRFA to single famrry and prlma ry secondaryunits as well as mu-rtl-family units. Th;';ip;t"tlon on mur.ti-f ami'ly unrts was that no o-eck or balcony inc-r.osures or any
:::?:..,""::ootli.:r. or atterarrons witt be atrtweo for mul.ri_fami..y\rrys'r'rrrr9s. rne reasoning behind this stlpuJ.ation $/as that iimul ti-fami ly buitding owners encrosed ther.r decJ(s, or addedexterior addl tlons the bu-r.k and mass of the buildlng would begreatLy rncreased. It was felt that these types of enclosureswould have a very negative impact on the'appearance of thebulld1ng as a LrhoLe as we.L-l as adjacent properties.
Staff does agree with the appl-1cant in hr.s .statement that ,,the
@ reouested variance to other e:ristlnd l.:pc cen
vaiL Townhomes have undergone numerable unit remodets ot similar
na ture through the years and there certain-ty appears to be enoughvariety to alrovr exterlor changes without itterrng the pro3ect;sarchitectural character. " staff does not feeL that the addltionscreate a negative bur.k and mass for the buirding. Moreover,staff feels that the exterior alterati.ons in most cases serve Eoupgrade the 6tructure. The staft does have some concerns aboutthe appearance ot the north elevation. Hoerever, the criticalpoint to resolve is whether or not the GRFA additions shouLd beconsidered to be a grant of speciar privilege. staff cannotdetermine any physlcar. hardshrp which wouid varrant the approvar.of the proposed GRFA. For this reason, statf believes itrat itwouLd be a grant of special priviLege to alrow the GRFA additj.ons.
setba.c\ vari.ances: staff feels that it wourd not be a grant ofspecial prlvilege to al. 1ow the sethack variances. At flrstgiance, this opinion may seem to be in conflict w1 th the staffposition on the GRFA varr.ances. rt is important to remember thateach variance request must be treated separately. Even though,
-qiy:n_this proposa.lr the two requests are interdependent. Thevail Townhomes have a lot Layout r.rhich makes it very ditticultto add any square footage to a structure $rlthout requiringvarl.ances. In factr the existing units on each property aLreadyencroach slgnitlcantly into the 2o toot setbacks which are- requrrelon aLl sides ot the property. These encroachments are due to thefact that the lots are so narroH. staft strong-ty belleves thatthere are extraordinary circumstances due to the Lot rayoutsvJhich r.rarrant approvaL of the side setback variances.
staff berieves tha t there are no significant impacts in respectto these concerns for either the GRFA reguests or s].de setbackreques ts.
SUCH OTHER FACTORS AND CRITERIA AS THE COMMTSSION DEEMS APPLICALBETHE PR ARIAN
That the granting of the variance wilr not constitute a grant ofspeciar priviLege r.nconsistent with the Limitations on otherproperties classrt]-ecl in the same d].str1ct.
That the granting of the variance \rlL j notpublic healthr 6afety, or welfarel or maproperfres or improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or
rea son s:
be detr imenta I to the
ter:.afl-y in;urious to
more of the f o11ow:.ng
The effeqt of the requesterd variance on light and air, distri-bution
?f ,p,o,?qlatlor], ,transporta tion ano trfacilitj.es and utr -|.rt:.e
Tfe .?Ianning and Fnvlqonmental .Commiss:.g4 shalr *-]gf!gs.!fg1!gtlndlngs before granEinq a ffi
The strict or rlteral interpretatlon and entorcement ot thespecified reguiation wouLd resuL! in practicaL difficuLty orunnecessary physical handship inconsistent with the objectlvesof this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary clrcumstances orconditions appl.rcab]e to the site of the variance that donot apply generatly to other properties in the same zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of thespecittecl regulation woutd diprrve the applicant of priviLegesen3oyed by the or^rners of other properttes in the samedi.s tri ct.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
GRFA variances: Given the stipurations in ordrnance No. 4 whichstate that deck and balcony encl.osures are not aLlowect as we.ri asthe fact that there is realry no physicaL hardship concerningthis requestl statt recommend! denial of the GRFA varlances. Togrant the request vrould be a dec j.sion which is inconsistent uiththe Llmi ta tions on other properti.es ',.rithin this same zone district.
siqg sgtback variances: staff recommends approval of the sidese Ebac.K variances as there are exceptions or extraordinarycircumstances on the si.te due to lot layout vhich do not general-Lyapply to other properties in this same zone. rt is also feLtthat the granting of the variances $rouLd not be detrrmentaL tothe publ.].c hea lth, satety or r.relf are or ma teria 1ly j.nlurious t.oproperti'es or improvements in the viclnity. rn the pastr staf f hasapproved side setback variances tor properties wlthin thisdeve.Lopment. For these E€dsonsr staff oelieves that it would notb" ? grant of special privilege to approve the slde set.backvariances.
\---
l--
!
I ,.uT'L'Tt
--i l/ -.---
.____,::L::
l{:; .1:3 s
LOT II
(o
A'
LOT 13
_.i.1i= €?-'\=-- ?-gaao-^
rg?iitc:.1
o
,i
l'of\r
o)
9>
=-- = =,'
" uQr
wryr-^*ck
,V zg.)
DRIVE
LOT 12
TWO STORY TOWNHOME
{: --.
w ?7.tt
I
t-' lir-1
I
Ir* - -f_
I
,
),I
11 I-fi- ri-r-/t ./ It':!.U,
/ K\oa
tlI'
.- 2qAfH Eu=V4ii+J p*gred (Drawinss have been reduced)
Nf lT; i,::\1Al:aN C:xt4;tS.t (REDUCED)
t+ a€..aFE L>ler-
,l
l-.lo,{H E-jvlilta1.-J (pRoposEDJ Drawinss have been reduced)
'4.t.;
PECt s/11/85 -2-
alteration. Armstong said
dining room. Piper inquired
that the doors are tract
Donovan askeo what the main reason was for requesting theit was to increase the feeling of "outcioors" in the main
as to the physical means of opening doors. The reply was
mounted and folded.
Viele moved and SEhultz seconcied to app Vote:-=-==-:--=--was / -u 'l n ravor.
5. A rgqLest=fgr GRFA and setback variances in order to construct additions
on Units l2A and l2B of the VaiTTownhoVail Vill lst Filins.cant:
Affeldt moved and Viele seconoed to a rove the setback vari ance because of theexrstln)E ck, and to denv t on qrounos o Qnaa l i rlv
The vote was 5 in favor anci 2 (Briner and Hopkins) oppos
6.A uest for side rear and watercourse setback variances in ord
The, s,t'aff presentation,.'tvas givert..by"Kristan Pritz,whn stated-that.the. staff r ;;"... -..
reccnmenoeo approval for the sioe setback variance .. denial of the GRFA variance.
Kurt.Segerb€r9, F€Pfesenting the applicant, gave a presentation on behalf of the
lPPl icant. Discussion following concerning how Ordinance 4 applieo to this proposal.
Gordon Pierce-spoke in an attempt to he'l p ixplain the appijcant,s intent ano'thbproposal's relationship to the ordinance. Piper pointei'out that Ordinance 4does not allow for multi-fami'ly cieck enclosures. He stated that originaliy the
PEC wanted multi-family exteribr remoqels adciressed, however, multi-iamity'exieriorremodels were exclucieci from the ordinance. Donovan felt that there was nb differencebetween this proposal and the Sandstone 70 proposa'I. Affeldt felt that this waianother special privilege case. Viele felt'thb issue was identical to the oneat Sandstone 70. He personally did not have a probtem with the proposal anci feltit was a good one for the community. Viele felt the PEC needs cleai directjonon the issue of multi-family deck Lnclosures from the Council.
gontll,l.! g a..{ unO i,ot S, ,.utrUOi r ;\-.- -./Ross Davis' representing several of the owners of other townhouses,'ieit thai-the townhouse association could reject the proposal due to the fact that thatthis area was a general common element. patteh said that he rvoulO ruquire inesignature of the condominium association before the staff would accept the app'l icatjon.Segerberg_requested the application be tableo indefinitely. patten itateo ttrbtDavii woulo be notified if and when the application appea-red on the agenda inthe future. Donouun rou.d und Aff"ldt s .i tem ild6finitelThe vote *ut
resubdivision
PRESENT
Eric Affelot
Tom Bri ner
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins (1st meeting)
Duane Pi per
Sio Schultz
Jim Viele
Planning anci Environmental Cornmjssion
September 9, .l985
STAFF PRESEI\T
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylman
2. Request for an e$g-[-s-t_3]!erq!ion in order to ado a thirci story to the Hilli
Due to insuffient notice, staff recommenoeo tabling to September 23. Vjele moveoano Donovan seconoeo to table to 9/23,/85. Vote in'favor br i.niini z_ffi-
3' A request for a GRFA variance in oroer to enclose a oeck on a seconq floor
Ifl 9tgun gave the staff presentation inciuciing a recommenclatjon of oenial . Brian0'Reilly,-representing^Kar1 Scherer gave a presentation on behalf of the proposal .
Plingt felt the proposal was to b6 an imirrovement anc wai not a qangerous preceoent.Affelot wonciereo how the_request relateo to the orciinance concerning aociitionalGRFA. Viele hao no problem with the aesthetics, but felt it nray be a grant ofspecial.privilege. Piper felt that 'it was difficult to prove a-hardship fromthe variance criteria. . Donovan was sytirpathetic to the appearance, but feltthe boarq ciio not have the tooli to ippiove ttre.equesi, ii! irre ipprovar woulo createa prececient for allowing aooitional ghFR tnat woulci be oiffjcult to'oeal with.
Brjner moved anci Hopk.i ns seconcieo to approve the request. The rnotion was oefeateciffi
t.Approval of minutes of August 29, .l9g5.The minutes were approveo with fourin favor and 3 absientions.
uest for rior alteration of less than .|00 uare feet in order toenc tose a rt ion of the din tio at B n the Gore I azaBuilding.cant:u's Beanery
4.
Tom Braun gave the staff presentation. He expiained that no uDGp sub-areas wereaffected. He acicied that pedestr.i an.ization, streetscape framework and street edqewere not negatively affected. The staff recommendation was ibi .ripir*t
Tom.Armstrong, appl.icant, restated that only a very smalI encroachment on outdoordlnlng would be made and that the sliding dcors woirlci be open to allow tor ihe outdoordining experience inside as well. He added that 6-9 additional people woutci Ue-ableto enjoy the outdoors with this proposal and that it was not precedent settinq,
(
PRES ENT
Eric Affelot
Tom Briner
Diana Donovan
Pam Hopkins (1st meeting)
Duane Pi per
Sici Schultz
Jim Viele
Planning anci Environmental Comrnission
September 9, l9g5
STAFF PRESEI\T
Peter Patten
Tonr Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylman
1.
fpploval
of ,mllulffiUst 28, 1985.
2. Request for an e*gll!*frelalign jn oroer to aoo a thirci story to the Hiili
The minutes were approveo wjth four
Due to insuffient notice, staff recommenoeci tabling to September 23. Vjele moveq. Vote in"ravor-ii-i"niirq-z_ff-
3.A ques!=fgr l GRFA variance in oroer to enclose a oeck on
IgT Pl1'n gave the staff presentation incluci ing a recommenoation of oen.ial. Brian0'Rejlly, representing^Kai1 sctrerer-fave a preientation on behalf of the proposal,Bri ner felt the proposal was to uE an imfrovement uno "ui nor a oangerous preceoent.Affelot wondereo how the-".qr.tt-- ."rut"o t0 the ordinance concerning aoci.itionalGRFA- viele haq no probrem'with the-aeitt.t-i.r, but fert ii nray be a grant ofspecial .privilege. Piper felt ttrai-ii-was difficult to prove a hardship fromthe variance criteria. . Donovan was synrpathetic to the appearance, but feltthe boarq oio not ha.v: lhe iiii; ti-gqp"ove the request, and the approvar wourd crearea prececient for al'lowing aoojtjonal ehFn tnat woulci be oiff.i cult to cieal with.
Briner moved anrj Hoo . The rnotion was oefeateoffi
4. A uest for exterior alteration of less than .l00
s uare feet i n orderenc lose a on_or the dininffi in the re CreBuildinq.pplicant: 81u,s Beanery
Tom Bnaun gave the staff presentation. He explained that no uDGp sub_areas wereaffected. He acided that pedestrianiiaiion, streetscape framework and street edqewere not negatively affected. rne stiri recommendition wJi'-tor approval
Tom Armstrono-'aonlicant, restated that only a very small encroachment on outdoordining would"be mhce and-that ihe-sii'iing aco"s woulci be open to allow for the outdoordining experience'inside as well. He aciied ttrat ols-adiiiionul people woulci be ableto enjoy the outdoors with this proposar and that ii *ai noi precedent setting.
()seconci floor. )cnerer
{
PECo
the main reason was for requesting the
the feeling of "outdoors" in the main
means.of opening doors. The repiy was
9111/85 -2-
alteration, Armstong said
dining room. Piper inquired
that the doors are tract{
Donovan askeci whatit was to increase
as to the phys'ical
mounted and folded.
r the staff memo. Votewas 7-0 in favor.
5.4 uest for GRFA and setback variances in order to construct add'itions
0n ni ts and l2B of the Vai ownnouses at Lot 12 ub of Blk 5
a 'l pp1 i cant:v'+vln
The, sitaff presentation|was giverl..by"Kristan Prjtz.,who stated'that;the, staff rr i;i;1 r.reccr'lmenoeo approval for the sioe setback varjance .., den'i al of the GRFA varjance.
Kurt.Segerberg' rePresenti!g the applicant, gave a presentation on behalf of theapplicant. Discussion following cbircernin! 6ow Ordinanie 4 uppli"o-iii-ir,ii proposat.Gordon Pierce-spoke in an attem[t to help 6xplain itr..ppticunt's jntent and theproposal's relationship to the brdinance. Riper pointeii'ori that 0rdinanc" q- -
does not allow for multi-family cieck enclosures. He stated that or.;ginatit ihePEC wanted multi-family exteri6r
"emooeis adciressed, however, mutti-iamiiy'eill.io"remodels were exclucieci from the ordinance. Donovan felt that there was no differerrcebetween this.proposal and the sandstone 70 proposal. nireiJt felt that this wasanother special privilege case. Viele felt the issue was identical to the oneat Sandstone 70. He peisonally did not have a prob'tem with ine'iropJiui"lri"ierrit was 9 good one for.the comm-unity. Viele feli the PEC needs clear directionon the issue of murti-famiry deck Lncrosures from the councir.
{Affel dt moved and Vi le seconoed to rove t setback var] ance because of theexi st in 0' setbac and to on r0unos 0 specl a r] v t l evotewas 5 in avor and Hopk ns I oppos
6.A st for s'ide and watercourse setback variances in order toconstreck an L Lu aciqition o
pplicant: T
l?:t.?...yi:l-representing several of the owners of other townhouses, fert thati;;";;;;'u'"i "tilii
lff .l::: Ir.l-s?l:lat.common ei;i;;!. - patteh iiio-irrai-rre would require the::g:i*:: 3l^lF.::'g?Till:T.association psrqis lhq ,!;;i ;;,i;";;;;i"ii," Jljprication.
l:g:ib.".lg" pgyestg{.|'q gqpr i cation ue-iariea indeii;i;;iy. -"p;ti.r-li"ilji ifili
?ilt:,1::10 b3^T:ili:l il l'g ry1en-!1e inpri.ulion ;p;;;'fu ;;"iil ;;;il; ;;lF illl":: it"'"i'iEii'lTt.iThe vote was 7-0.-
a
tt
(sr4 s75 -s3oo
ROBERT W. GALVIN
I3O3 EAST ALGONQUIN ROAO
ScHAUM BURG, TLLtNOtS 6Or96
July 25, 1985
Mr. Kurt A. SegerbergMr. Gordon R. Pierce
1000 South Frontage Road WestVai1, Colorado 81657
Dear Kurt and Gordonl
Attached are the marked-up "original" p1ans. I believe that my red
markings are self-explanatory and are close to dimensiona]l-y accurate.
A few selected observations may be in order. The entrance and stair-
case is one that we like very much and hope is executable. We have many
ideas with regard to windows for it which are not illustrated, but that
is a detail. They would be on the east wa11s.
You will note a black line illustration at the northeast corner of all
leve1s described as the alternate squared off wa11 p1an. If we can
enclose the back decks, our preference is to enclose them squa.red off.At least the basement enclosure should and could be squared off becauseit is already recessed into an undercut of the earth.
The aggregate square footage addition for each apartment is comfortablywithin the 250 foot allowance. If we were confined to 250 feet for the
entlre building, then the area that we most willingly give up is the filling
out of the under-decking of the basement bedrooms.
I did not retain a copy of this set of reworked drawings, and I would
appreciate your either bringing many of the sheets up-to-date on a new
drawing or returning my drawing to me at your convenience.
C1ear1y, one of the persuasive aspects of gaining approvel will be thetastefulness of how you reconmend we improve the exterior including theroofing. We look to you for the best ideas for that.
You witl note that I suggest a Swiss Chalet styled window for the veryfront. That is meant to be an illustrative idea. The entire entrancearea deserves to be signiflcantly improved with quality doors, lighting,
etc.
RWG:MB Robert
C3 ".'
r-< J 1o/rf F<I
\J
The next item was action on contracts with Eagle
animal control, environmental health services and
short discuss'i on by Council, Dan Corcoran made a
Kent Rose seconded the motion- A vote was taken
6-0.
The ninth item was action on the lease for the lower level of the 0'i d Town Shop
bui'l ding. t-arry Est<iitn.*pfained the l;;=;-- After a short discussion by Counci1'
Ga.i I llahrlich-Lowenthal made a motion to-ipprove the 1.ease,.which was seconded by
Gordon p.i erce. R voie was taken and the motion passed unanimously 6-0'
The next item was action on the offer to the Postal service for sites of future
postai facilities' Ron Phill ips gave Uutlgf*ili-nlTyfi?" on sites and asked for
approval of sending a drafted ietier to i1,i Regionai Director of the Postal Service
in Santa Barbara, California. After some a;t.Jssion, Gordon Pierce made a motion to
approve sending tne ietier; Gail 14ahrlich-Lowenthal seconded the motion' A vote was
ial.n "na the motion passed 5-1, with Kent Rose opposing.
County pr"oviding law enforcement,
UuiIiing inspection. After a
motion to aPProve the contracts'
and the motion passed unanimously
The eleventh item on the agenda was the-rgpegl*q!the Scherer GRFA variance
;;;r;;;:"'io' i.urn "*pi"inea the ci.rcumETiniEl of tll^tlllil;Eil-anT'TEillY,
r"ir.=..ar"g c..i-i.[.'rer, exptained why they think the appeal should be granted.
To grant additional GRFA in an
spec ia1 pri vi 1ege.
already dense area would be a grant of
!.fter much discuss.i on by counc.i l, a motion to uphold the PEC decision was made by
Dan Corcoran. Cotteen'flin. i..ona"d the motion. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously 6-0. Gail l,lahrlich-Lowenthal suggested a joint meeting with the
P'l anning and Environmental Commjssion in the future io discuss GRFA's and property
imorovements; Dan Corcoran agreed. lz- 4- B J u2-4 f 6 cz"ao-
The next item was the appeal of the-G-qlyin GRFA vlllsnce t"equ,g-st: After-a short
diicr==ion by Councii,-i4"yo. Johnstoffi-Co.corin ana*Gor"don Pierce all abstained
-4from voting due to u..iori involvements with this property' It was *"hen decide
that the item would have to be tabled because there were not enough members present
to make a quorum.
Next r.ras citizen participation. cynthia steitz asked questions regarding rean-
nexaiion of Buffehr creek, Highland Meadows and Matterhorn areas' various council-
*.*U"t. and staff responded to her questions'
The findings were noted:
1. The re.l ationship of the requested varjance to other existing or potential
uses and structures in the vicinity'
iftherequestweregranted,.itcouldbecomeprecedentsettingandthe
enclosure of several balconies would have an impact. Furthermore, existing
development is dramatically over ihe allowable density and the enc'l osure of
..u.r"i balconies would be an even greater dens'ity increase'
?. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement "f'" rp..ified reguliiion i. necessary to achieve compatibiljty
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity'
The nexi item was the first reading of Ordinance No' 22' Series of 1985' an
ordinance amending the l4unic.i pal Code UV'if..,.-"JAition of a, new section entitled
,,Special Boards". Mayor Johnston "..U it"'."iuii titfe .of the ordinance' Rick Pylman
and Peter Patten gave de'uails behind tne"orainance and some background'i nformation'
t1ichael Staughton exp'i ained the Vait neitaurant Association's stand requesting
special boards. After much discussion [y-co'ntil l-?:l corcoran made a mot'i on to
deny the ordinance. Colleen Kline seconied the molion' A vote was taken and the
motion passed unanimously 6-0. Councif
'.rgg"ti.a the Restaurant Association think
rp-u"ltlt ideas of signage and to..upp.oiii Council at a later date with
sugge s ti ons.
The seventh item on the agenda was the Local Ljquor Authority appointments' There
were f.i ve (5) applicants ior the t;,r"" i!j-op"ning..on the Board' CounciI voted and
noUert Xendail, Robert Ford and Saliy Hanlon were chosen'
-2-
jay Peterso6 questioned the tabling of thilGqhd__n GRFA variance request appeql,s.ua'-ingthatthreemembersvlereabletovoteonckeo
anc stated that three counci'l members could vote on an.i ssue. Kristan pritz
presented infor"mation on the vani ance request and noted the findings:
The degree to which relief from the strict or literaj interoretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility anduniformity of treatment among sites in the viciniiy or to attain ihe obSeciivesof th'i s title without grant of special privilege.
0rdinance No. 4 was designed to make it easier for appiicants to add GRFA tosingle family and primary secondary unjts as weii as multi- fami'l y unjts. Thestipulation on multi-family units was that no deck or balcony encioru..s or anyexterior additions or alterations will be ailowed for multi-iamily dwellings.
The reasoning behind thjs stipulation was that if multi-family building owiersenclosed their decks, or added exteri or additions the bulk and mass of thebuilding wouid be greatly increased. No physical hardship can be determinedwhich would warrant the approval of the proposed GRFA. For this reason, itwould be a grant of special privilege to allow the GRFA additions.
Keni Rose acted as Mayor. Colleen Kfine made a motion to uphold the pEC decision.
and Gail lrtahrlich-Lowenthal seconaeal vote was iaken ana tr,e-mJt....-ion passea:+,with Mayor Johnston, Dan Corcoran and Gordon pierce abstaining.
The next item r^ras not scheduled. Mayor Johnston made a public apology to the
Councilmembers negarding a heari ng with the MBIA on Vail's bond rating to be held onFriday, October 11. He then asked members if they would like to go to New york atKirchner Moore's expense to represent the Town. After much discuision. noadciitional Counci lmembers were suggested.
The next jtem was the Town Manager's Report. Ron Phillips stated that the Vail
symposium would be held Fri day and Satur"day,0ctober 4 and 5. The Town tmployeeGolf Tournament would be heid Friday, October 11. He also reminded eueryone thatthe Counc'i I election would be held November 19, and that today was the first day apetition form could be picked up. Forms must be returned by 0ctober 21st. Theiewould also be a Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) dinner at Los Amigos on
Thursday evening, 0ctober 3.
There being no further bus'i ness, the meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Respectfui 1y submitted,
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
AltLSt:
Minuies taken by Brenda Chesman
-3-
or \
!l
(
\.
TO:
FROU:
DATB:
su&rBef:
Plannrng and Env j.ronment Commission
Community Development Department
September 9r 1.985
A request for a GRFA varlance ancl east and Lrestvari.ances in order to build an exterior addiUnits 12A and l28 of the Vait Tosrnhomes,Resubdivision of block 5 a part of Gore CreekVaiJ.llage, tst fijinSAppl-icant3 Robert- Gal.vin
DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant j.s requestrng to add adcritional. GRFA to both theLower unit and upper unit Located on Lot L2 0f the vair ror.rnhomes.rn order to construct thls adcti cron, a GRFA variance is necessaryas welL as east and west side setback variances. I1r. catvin o$/nsboth units- He is proposing to add 227 square feet to the.lower
"11t .und -I44 square feet to the upper unit. The Lower unit,sadclltional square tootage $/i11 be- used to expand a basementbedroom, as well as the first Level. Iiving ,oL., ctining room,kltchen, bunk room and ski storage area. Afre upper unit squaretootage wilr be used to expand an existing bedrooir'and to redesigna stairr'ray. similar to most units in the vail Townhomes oevel0p-mentr this particular project is a]so over the ar.rowed GRFA torthe lot. Given HDMF zoningr the totaL al.lowed GRFA is 1r763square feet- The existrng GRFA is 21-r32 square feet. At.thlstime the tr.'o units are arready 969 square teet over the GRFAallowed tor this property. v,tith the ner^, addi.tionsr the GRFA srlrrexceed the alLowable by lr34O square feet.
The setbacks for the 1ot are al.so dffected by this proposal..
::."F "::^i:g,reguires 2o foot setbacks on aLl sides of the pioper-Ey- .eresentlyr the north and south setbacks meet the zo tootstanclards- However the existing east and west setbacj(s arecomp'letely encroach_ed upon leaving a o foot setback. The currentproposar will not 6ffect the north and south setbacks. The eastsetback witL be encroachect upon an additlonal l8 feet and wil.Jcreate a 0 foot setback. The west setback $riJ.1 be encroachedupon an additl.nai r-2 teet and wi. 11 create a (J toot setback.
setbacktion totot 12,Drive,
/ Zoninq Sta tistics
\ HDMF Zone
Lot Area = 21939 s.f.Tota1 GRFA Allowed = Lr763
GRF'A GRFAExj.sting proposed
s.f.
3l_0 3
-1763
Lower Unit 1656 s.f. 227
Upper Uni t J.076 s. t.
TOTAL 2732 s.f.
s. f. ( j.ncludes
deduction for
144 s.t.
371 s. f.
GRF.A Incl.ucling
Aclcli tion
25 s. f. 1883 s. t.aj.rlock)
L22O s.t.
3103 s. f.
Totai Extsting 2232
Tota I All"owed -1763
Amount over
a llowed +969
Total Proposed + Exj.stingTotai ALl.owed
(
SETBACKS:
GRFA lrith Additions f34O
Required 20 ft. on a-IL sides of propertyExisting Setbacks: East: 0 ft.
West: O ft.North: 29 fE.
South: 20 tt. (16 ft. from front
fence )Given This Proposa l:
East: Encroaches an additional
l8 ft. creatlng a O ft.
se tba ck
West: Encroaches an additional
L2 tt. creating a 0 ft.
se tba ckNorth: una t tected
South: una ffected
APPLICANT.S REASOXS_ Jgg IEQUESTING THESE VARIANCES
"rn regard to units 12A ancr t28 of the vail Townhouses, we arerequesting additional 6quare footage by means of exterl0r addltionand aJ.teration. Fi.rstr in order to achieve the addrtionaJ. squarefootage as otterect under ordrnance No. 4, mr.nor exterior alter-ations would be necessary. Although Ordrnance No. 4 suggeststhat additronal square footage can only be added to the interiorshel] of a muLti-family unitr Townhouse Units f2A anal IZB have nopracticaL interior space to enlarge upon. secondr.y, the Gar.vinfamily has indicated to us that they are very much interested incompletely upgrading their tvo vai..t rownhome unrts. The units(
.'I
I
have signitrcant vlsibili.ty nithin the v11"lage core and anyetforts to upgrade the unlts hrould be beneficial to afl and workr"roul.d invoLve new exterior f inishing and deta rling to both theexisting and changed portions of the Townhouse units. The vaitTovtnhouses have undergone numerabLe unlt remodels ot simiLarnature through the years and there certainly appears to be anenough variety to alLow exterior changes without a-tterlng theproject's architecturaJ. character.,' (Letter August 6, 19g5)
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon revieur ot CriterLa and Findingsl Section 18.62.060 of theMunicipal code, the Departmeqt o@ent. recommendsdeniaJ. of the GRFA_geqgests
based upon the tol.lowinE factors:
Considera tion of Factors
T!: r,"l"rt1".sh1p lpo ten t ia l- Uses and structUres
GRq4 variances: The exterior alterations to the upper and lowerunlts shouLd not have negative impacts on adJacent uses orstructures in the vicj.nity. In generall the exterior alterationswill serve to upgrade the structures and shouJ-d have a posrtlveimpact on nerghboring proper tie s.
( side setback Varlances: Both the east and west side setbacks\- urrr' be eftected by this proposal. However, o foot setbacksalready exist on boEh sides of the property, The actditions r./i r-tcreate a I'arger area that encroaches into both the east and westsetbacks. Howeverr these encroachments r^ri l1 not negativeLyimpact nei.ghboring properties as they are basicalry infirladditions to existing patj.os and decks.
The legree to which relief from the strict or Literal interpreta-!re!1 and entorcement ot a qpec]'tied requlatlon j.S necessaachieve c tibility and uniformitv ot Erea tment amonq sites rnthe v1crn1 or to attaln t obfectlves of this title withoutgrant of special privijEgre.
9RFA variances: ordinance No. 4 was designed to make it easiertor appricants to acrcr GRFA to single f ami. ry and primary secondaryunits as vell- as muLti-fami.ty units. Trre stiprilation on mul.tilfamily unlts was that no deck or baLcony inclosures or anyexterior additions or alteratrons will be ar.1os/ed for mu]ti-f amilydwellings- The reasoning behind this stipulation was that ifmulti-famity building owners encfosed thei.r decJ<'s, or addedexterior addi tions the bulk ancr mass of the buirding r.rould begreat-ly lncreased. rt was felt tha t these types of encLosuresr'tould have a very negative impact on the -Jppearance of thebuilding as a whole as r4reLL as adjacent properties.
s ta f f does agree r.ri th the appl icant in his sta tement tha t ,'the
{
vair rownhomes have undergone numerabre unit remodels of similar
na ture through the years and there certainly appears to be enoughvariety to al.tow extertor changes without altering the project.sarchitecturai character. " Staff does not feeL tha t the additionscreate a negatlve bulk and mass for the buiicling. Moreover,staff feeLs that the exterior alterations in most cases serve toupgrade the structure. The statt does have some concerns aboutthe appearance ot the north eLevation. However, the criticatpoint to resolve is whether or not the GRFA additions should beconsidered to be a grant of special privt lege. staff cannotdetermine any physlcai hardship whlch wou-td rrrarrant the approvalof the proposed GRFA. For thls reason, statt believes tha t itwould be a grant of specia] privil-ege to afLor.r the GRFA additions.
Setback Varlances: Staff feel.s that it would not be a grant ofspecial" prrvilege to atlovr the setback variances. At flrstglance, this opinion may seem to be in conf .Lict with the staffposltlon on the GRFA varlances. rt is important to remember thateach variance request nust be treated separate]y. Even though,given this proposal, the two requests are interdependent. ThevaiI Townhomes have a Lot layout which makes it very ctj.tf icuttto add any srquare footage to a struct.ure without requiringvarlances. rn fact, the existing units on each property alreadyencroach signiticantLy into the 20 foot setbacks which are requrredon aLl sides ot the property. These encroachments are due to thefact that the lots are so narro$/. staft strongly believes tha tthere are extraordinary circumstances due to the lot "layoutswhich $rarrant approva I of the side setback variances.
The eflect of the requestect variance on light and air, distribution
staff beiieves that there are no significant impacts in respectto these concerns for either the GRFA reouests or side setbackreques ts.
SUCH OTHER FACTORS AND CRITERIA AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS APPLICALBE
T
That the granting of the variance wilj notspeciaL pri-vlLege rnconsistent wlth thepropert j.es classrtr.ect in the same dtstrtct.
consti tute a grant of
L imi ta tions on other
fhat Lhe granting of the variance vlll. notpublic health, safety, or welfarer oE rlldproperties or improvements in the vicinlty.
lhat the variance is warranted for one or
rea son6:
be detrinentaf to the
ter ia L l.y inSurious to
more of the f ol lowr. ng
I
(The strict or Literat interpretation and entorcement ot thespecified reguiation would result in practical difficulty orunnecessary physical hanilship inconsistent with the objectivesof this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary ci.rcumstances orconditions appilcable to the site of the variance that donot apply generalty to other properties in the same zone.
The strict or literaJ. interpretation and enforcement of thespecltlecr reguratton wouLd deprrve the applicant of privilegesen3oyed by the owners of other properties in the samedi s trict.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
GRFA variances: Given the stipulations in ordrnance No. 4 whichstate that deck and baLcony encfosures are not aLlovecl as hrer-t asthe fact that there is really no physical hardship concerningthis request; statt recommends denial of the GRFA variances. Togrant the request \"rouL d be a decision which is inconsistent withthe limitations on other properties withln this same zone district.
side setlack variancqs: sEaff recommends approval of the sideffi trrere -are exceptions or extraordinarycircumstances on the site due to lot layout whi-ch do not generall!apply to other properties in thrs same zone. rt is afso feftthat the granting of the variances wouid not be detrimentaL tothe pubj].c hea Lth, saf ety or we_lf are or ma terialJ.y inJur j.ous !oproperties or i.mprovements in the vicinity. rn the pastr staf f hasapproved side setback vari.ances tor properties w].thin thisdevelopment. For these E€asonsr staff Uelieves that it would notbe a grant of special. privllege to approve the side setbackvariances.
(
---.---
s 80o ,5. €?.or
LOT II
(o
No
ARE
--*OUTLTIIE OF
AO.JACEN T EUILOING ./
LOT 13
'J1)it f
@,r:.7-ce
/\29iTtot-J
-i1,ii'i S
"te2c*.7;Ap;'jl=i-.1,
-'rJt6!l
a)l
al o
--/
I
I
l3
lbt\t
oo
u,l
I
?z.t,i
o
{
{
=v-/:f1€c\'-c
(
{L
(
NfiT; ir*:\1Aj;tN C=Xi4ji.tN&,\ (REDUCED)
(
{
/l,4+4 Lc,at-.
Negtl E;ivli-k>J (PR0PosED) Drawinss have been reduced)
+'t.;
Gordon R.Pier Ice ' Architect . A.I.A.
RIC'DSEP191985I
September 17, 1985
I{r. Ron Phillips
l'lanager, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Appeal to Vail Town Council, Unit 12 A & B'
Lot 12, Block 5, Vail Village lst Filing(Robert Galvin Residence)
Dear Ron:
Wewou1d1iketoappealadecisionrecent1ymade
by the Vail Planning Comrnission on September 9,
1985 which denied Mr. Robert Galvin addilional GRFA
to his townhouse unit. We would appreciate your
consideration to have this proposal re-evaluated
by the Vail Town Council.
Sincerely,
h.ra
Kurt A.
Project
I(AS/1rt
SegerbergArchitect
1000 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 . 303/476-6776
f-/
C
'\.vLl"Planning and Envi ronmental Commiss ion
September 9, 1965
1:30 pm Site Visits
3:0C pm Public Hearing
l. Approval of rn'i nutes of August 28, 1985.
T0 BE TABLEp 2. Request for an exterior alteration in order to aod a thjrd story to
the Hill Builciing G 3.ll Brioge Street.
Applicant: Balnche Hill
.3., A request for a GRFA variance in order t::nclose a cieck on a seconq
floor of Unit l5-C of the Sancistone Conoominiums.
Appficant: Karl F. Scherer
4. A request for exterjor alteration of less than 100 square feet in oroer
to enclose a portion of the oining pai,io at Blu's Beanery in the Gore
Creek Pl aza Bui'l cii ng.
Appl icant: 81 u's Beanery
5. A request for GRFA anci setback varinces in oroer to construct aooitions
on Units 12A ano 128 of the Vail Townhouses at Lot 12, Resubd.ivision
of Block 5, Vail Village lst Fil ing.
Applicant: Robert GAIvin
T0 tiE TABLED 6. A request for sjcie, rear and watercourse setback varjances jn order to
construct a cleck and itot tub addit,ion on ijni t 5 of Va iI Tor,rnhornes.
Lot 5, resubdivision of 3lock, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Appl i cant: Tltornas J. Pri tzker
7. lrJork Session on the Va'i I Valley Medical Center
EW
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVi El^J
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING |(r
fir\id.n$drlrrrr
RQPOS{L: r r, ,ru L&tlL 1..vr,i'?e.+0:
oe
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Rev i ewed
Comments:
,^," glz#{-
Date
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
RECREATiON DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
t.
IVApplication DaLe fuoq(Kf /2, /fb{
PEC MTETING DATE September 9, 1985
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
fgl gn{ project requesting a variance. The applicationaII tnformation is submitted.
Robert Galvin
I.This
will
A.
procedure is required
not be accepted until
NAME OF APPLICANT
ADDRTSS 1303 East Alqonquin Road
Schaumburg, fL 60195
PHONE
312-s76-5300
B.NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE Gordon R. Pierce, Architect
1000 South Frontage Road la1est
Vail, CO 81657 PH0NE 476-6776
c.NAME 0F 0[,JNER(s) (type q rint
u r<-f 5
rt Ga1vin
1303 East Alcronquin RoADDRESS
Schaumburg, IL 60195
PHoNE
312-576-5300
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS Unit 12, Vail Townhouses,Gore Creek Drive, Vail, CO
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 12 BLOCK 5 FILING Vail Village. First Fi1ing
COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l,,ILL ACCEPT
names of owners of al I pro adj acent to the subject propert
THE APPLICANT l,JILL BE RESPONSiBLE FOR COR MAI L ING q Fq.
E. FEE gl00 Pnro$/r , hr' c--.-r----j--
THT FEE MUST BE PAID dEFdRE THE
YOUR PROPOSAL.
K #_(ngLraon fur€ A.ca, ArlW
II. A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTEDT0 ]DETERMIl{E IF ANY' ADDITIoNAL INFoRMATIoN ts nftoro.-'trio nppltcnf l0N r,.tILL BE- ACCEPTED UNLESS IT_IS_C0MPLETE (MUST INcLuDE Arf-iiirqi REQUTRED By THE zoNrNGADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPLiCANT,S NiiPONSIgTiiiV-TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENTh,ITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMiiiNi NTqUTNEMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION l,,ILL STREAMLINE THE NPPNOVRI- PROCESS FORYOUR PR0JEcr ev-orcRmsING-THE NUMBER 0F coNDrrrons-oF nppnovAL THAT THt pLANNTNG
AND ENVIR0NMENTAL COMMISSION MAY sTIPULATi: -nil-coNnirlolts
0F AppRovAL MUST BECOMPLIED I^IITH BEFORE A BUILDING PTNI,IIT-[i-iS5I'ED.--'':' r I
III. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOIIIING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRTCISE NATURE OF THE VARiANCE REQUESTED AND THEREGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS:
l. The relationship of the requested variance to'other existing or potentialuses and structures in the vicinity.
2' The- degree to which relief from the strict or litera'l interpretation andenforcement of a-specified regulation is n..".ruiy io ifni"u" compatibilitvand uniformit_v ol treatment afrong sites in ttre vittnitv-ij"-io;;il;;';h;'"objectives of this tiile without grant of special privitege.
N-q,mes of Adjacent Prooert 0wners - Galvin Remodel:
Mr. Charles Storey
5400 International First-ZDallas, TX 75270
l-lr. & Mre. Enelie 0gelsby
4722 Dtexel DriveDallas, TX 75285
VaiI Athletic ClubAttention: Eliot AIport
152 East Meadow DriveVaiI, C0 8L657
4. Christiania at VailAttention: Paul Johnson
156 East Hanson Ranch RoadVail. C0 81617
1.
2.
J.
5.
6.
Mr. Allenc/o Bishop
102 HansonVail, C0
RoIley
& Company
Ranch Road
8t557
Mr.
c/o
toz
Vail
& Mre.
Biehop
Hanson
c0
Bri dgewate r
& Compeny
Ranch Road
81657
I rr'!- t"I'f (L//
Gordon R.Pierce . Architect . A.I.A.
August 6, 1985
Ms. Kristan Pritz
Town of Vail"
75 South Frontage Boad WestVail, CO 81557
RE: Units l-2A and 128 - Vail Townhouses - Lot L2, Resub-division of Block 5, a part of Gore Creek Drive,Vail Vil-lage, First Filing - Square Footage Variance
Request
Dear Kristan:
In regards to Units 12A and 128 of the Vail Townhouses, weare requesting additional square footage by means ofexterior addition and alteration. The proposed remodel
changes are shown on the enclosed package of drawings. Wefeel that the general eontext of this project warrants avariance consideration for the following reasons.
First, in order to achieve the additional square footage asoffered under Ordinance No. 4, minor exterior alterationswould be necessary. Although Ordinance No. 4 suggests thatadditional square footage can onl_y be added to the interiorshell of a multi-famity unit, townhouse units 12A and 12Bhave no practicat interior space to enlarge upon. Secondly,the Galvin family has indicated to us that they are very
much interested in completely upgrading their two Vail town-house units. The units have significant visibility withinthe Village core and any efforts to upgrade the units wouldbe beneficial to all and work woul"d involve new exteriorfinishing and detailing to both the existing and changedportions of the townhouse units. The Vail Townhouses have
undergone numerable unit remodels of similar nature throughthe years and there certainly appears to be enough var.ietyto all-ow exterior changes without altering the project'sarchitectural character. We hope the elanning Commissionduly considers this variance request and should any furtherinformation or explanation be needed, please feel free tocontact us.
Best regard,
l,/ t ,tAlNA.t_
Project
KAs/lrt
enc.
1000 South Frontage Road West. Vail, Colorado 81657 .303/476-6776
Gordon R. Pie
I
rce ' Architect . A.I.A.
August 6, 1985
Ms. Kristan Pritz
Town of Vail.
75 South Frontage Road WestVail, C0 81657
RE: Unlts 12A and 128 - Vall Townhouses - Lot 12r Resub-division of Btock 5, a part of Gore Creek Drive,Vail- Village, First Filing - Square Footage Variance
Request
Dear Kristan:
In regards to Units 12A and I2S of the Vail Townhouses, lreare reguesting addltional square footage by means ofexterior addition and alteration. The proposed remodel
changes are shown on the encLosed package of drawings. Wefeel that the general context of this project warrants avariance consideration for the foltowing reasons.
First, in order to achieve the additional square footage asoffered under Ordinance No. 4, minor exterior aLterationswould be necessary. Although Ordinance No. 4 suggests thatadditional square footage ean only be added to the interiorshell of a multi-fanily unitr townhouse units 12A and l2Bhave no practical interior space to enlarge upon. Secondly,the Galvin fanily has indicated to us that they are very
much interested in completely upgrading their two Vail town-
house units. The units have significant visibiLity withinthe Village core and any efforts to upgrade the units wouldbe beneficial to all and work wouLd involve new exteriorfinishing and detailing to both the existing and changedportions of the townhouse units. The VaiI Townhouses have
undergone numerable unit remodels of similar nature throughthe years and there certainly appears to be enough var,ietyto allow exterior changes without altering the projectsarchitectural character. We hope the planning Commission
duJ.y considers this variance reguest and should any furtherinformation or explanation be needed, please feel free tocontact us.
Best regard,
l./ tl
{ta)r t\.t-- . -'
Project
KAS/l-rt
enc.
1000 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 . 303/476-67i6
Gordon R.Pie ' Architect . A.I.A.
I
rce
August 6, 1985
Ms. Kristan Pritz
Town of Vail75 South Frontage Road WestVail, CO 81557
RE3 Units l-2A and 128 - vail Townhouaes - Lot 12, Resub-division of Block 5, a part of Gore Creek Drive,Vail Village, First Filing - Square Footage VarianceRequest
Dear Krlstan:
In regards to Units 12A and l2B of the VaiI Townhouses, weare reguesting additional square footage by means ofexterior addition and alteration. The proposed remodelchanges are shown on the enclosed package of drawings. Wefeel that the general context of this project warrants avariance consideration for the following ieasons.
First, in order to achieve the additional square footage asoffered under ordinance No. 4, minor exterior arterationswould be necessary. Although Ordinance No. 4 suggests thatadditional square footage can only be added to t[; interiorshelL of a multi-family unit, townhouse units 12A and l2Bhave no practical interior space to entarge upon. SecondLy,
the_ Galvin family has indicated to us thal they are verymuch interested in completely upgrading thelr lwo Vail fown-house units. The units have significant visibility withinthe Village core and any efforts to upgrade the units wouldbe beneficial to all and work would invoLve new exteriorfinishing and detailing to both the existing and changedportions of the townhouse units. The Vail iownhouses haveundergone numerable unit remodels of similar nature throughthe years and there certainly appears to be enough varietyto allow exterior changes wlthout altering the projectsarchitectural character. We hope the planning Commissionduly considers this variance request and should any furtherinformation or explanation be needed, please feel iree tocontaet us.
Best regard,Arrttn.- .afvruvt ,1.t_ . _'KUrt A.
Project
KAs/Irt
enc.
1000 south Frontage Road west . vail, colorado 816s7 . 303/4i6-6776
Gordon R.
o
rce . Architect . A.I.A.Pie
August 6, 1985
Ms. Kristan Pritz
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vai1, CO 81557
RE: Unlts 12A and LzB - Vail Townhouaes - Lot 12r Resub-division of Block 5, a part of Gore Creek Drive,Vail Village, First Filing - Square Footage Variance
Request
Dear Kristan:
In regards to Units 12A and 128 of the Vail Townhouses, lte
are requesting additional square footage by rneans ofexterior addition and alteration. The proposed remodel
changes are shown on the enclosed package of drawings. Wefeel that the generaL context of this project warrants a
variance consideration for the following reasons.
First, in order to achieve the additional square footage as
offered under ordinance No. 4, minor exterior alterations
would be necessary. Although Ordinance No. 4 suggests that
additional square footage ean only be added to the interiorshell of a multi-family unit, townhouse units 12A and 128
have no practieal interior space to enlarge upon. Secondly,the Galvin family has indieated to us that they are very
nuch interested in eompleteLy upgradlng their two Vail town-
house units. rhe units have significant visibility withinthe village core and any efforts to upgrade the units woul"d
be beneficial to all and work would involve new exteriorfinishing and detailing to both the existing and changedportions of the townhouse units. The Vail Townhouses have
undergone numerable unit remodels of similar nature throughthe years and there certainly appears to be enough varietyto allow exterior changes without alterlng the projeets
architectural character. We hope the Planning Commissionduly considers this variance request and shoul-d any further
information or explanation be needed, please feel free to
contact us.
Best regard,Artftin, alf"attttua a It__ . _
Project
KAS/1rt
enc.
1000 South Frontage Road West. Vail, Colorado 81657.303/476-6776
tl
!"-f,1,1 fi T I T 1... Er t.il..lAftt:l f'l Th.f r:,ilPl f'AF! Y
R e i. r' ..: 5 r: fr i: :, fr F f i. bI + Ifrgr:r.anc* ll:':,irrpani' c'{: ['l i fr n * s. '] t,:t
"fHAtjli Yr:r{_! f.:i.,ll YilLtl{ r._iFitrHf.i
ftlj g! rJ g. f {-i .I , I ';r::15
tllur-- tlir.,J*r.: V7,?!:r{!
EtI-IYEFI !
E'.lr{Ef t-1" l.i " r:iALV I I.J E r|J f',lARy It " I:AL.V I t,j
-:.LLl,l l-; ;
Ailf,rflE* j:i:
i:ir:iRfr!:rf.,l F I EFtr::F:
i{l{"irJ :;;" Ff.:ilNlAt-i[ F:[iFlIi l,J.rjAIt-, r-:i:r r.?1*57
, L ALfn: ir:LIRT :l;HtjERFFF:ri
rrl
COMMITMENT
TO INSURE
This commitment was produced and
issued through the office of
LAND TITLE
GUARANTEE C(IMPANY
108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST - P.O, BOX 357
vArL, coLoRADO 81658
l3o3l476-2251
Countersigned:
racglo EurluplJerr e rq pauftualunoc ueqa prp^ aq ol'v e1npaps ur u.toqs ,t"p .,{t uo srocuJo tg:rl?l,i:
p^t;iXlll"#:#
olunoreq eq 01 l?as pue aureu e1e:od:oc slr pesn?r sBrl Elosauur1,11;o Iueduro3 ocu?rnsul aFII 'COAUSHAI SS1INJ1AI NI
'luaullluuroS sgql ,(q para,roc uoeteql a8zSpour Jo lseJolul lo 3lElsa oql enp^
roJ plorar;o sannbce pernsur pesodord eql elup aq1 ol rolrd lnq Joororl el?p a^ptoJJo eql o1 luanbesqns Eu1qcu11e
ro spJocar cnqnd eql ur Srnruadde lsru 'pol?ort 'i(uu Jr 'sroll?ur leqlo ro suIrelf, asJa^pe 'soJuuqurncue 'suefl 'slJeJoO '9
'sprocar rlqnd oql fq uaaoqs
1ou pue mu1 l{q pasodrul 'peqslurn3 relJeelorl Jo eroJolereql ppapur Jo JoqE 'secl^res toJ 'uoJ[ u o1 1qftr ro 'uatt rtuy 'n
'sproce: c11qnd aqt,(q ualoqs lou er? qcFl,t\ pue osoltsp ppo,rir sssturerd ag13o uoqcedsut
pue {eArns peJtoc e qcql\ slceJ ,{ue pue 'sluaurqceoJJus 'BeJa ur a8elrorp'sau11 ,{repunoq q slclguoc 'setcuudarcstq 't
'sproceJ cllqnd aql {q uaaoqs lou'sluouesBo Jo surlBlt ro 'slueuesEg 'Z
'spJotor clqnd eqt r{q ualoqs 1ou uorssassod u1 salped 3o surlulc ro slq8tg 'I
:3ur,tro11o3 eql ol lcafqns osle st lueuilltutuoJ sltll
'ol perroJer e,roqe eEuro,roX uo{ suolsnloxg pue suo11e1ndr1g puE suoJllpuoC eql q pauleluoc slsl}flu aql ot uolllpp? ul
sNotrdtcx3 0uvoNVrs
'luaurllururoC sFIl;o suoSsyrord aq1 o1 1co[qns tre pw uo pas?q
eq tsnu lueullul(xog slp Iq pera oc uoereql atztuoru eql Jo snluls eql ro $arelul Jo alulse eql ot epn aql Jo snlEls eql Jo lno
tripl.ru ,{ueduroS aqt tsr4ele 8Wq
^pur
ro arsq deur parnsul pxodord aql l?ql uollcB Jo slqtp ro suolpe ro uollte i(uV 't
'ulareq pelJqpou flssardxe se ldacxa
tuauqpuuroC spll Jo u?d r apBu pue acuaraJar Iq pelerodrocul fqeraq are qolq^\ pemsuJ pasodord aql Jo ro^BJ tq roJ_pellltu
-uroc sapqod ro ,(iqod3o rurbg aqi go a8era,r63 urdrj suopnpxa aql'pue-suollqndns pw suotllpuoC aql puE suo$r^ord Ernmsul
arg o1 pefqns sg dt1;1qsil qcns pue roJ pe11p11uoc salcqod ro fc11od aq1 roJ V elnpeqcs q pe]els lunou? gql pearxa 4!llq?.q qlns
fier$ lue e ou q 'lueru uruo3 slql Iq pararoc uoe:eql e8uSlrour ro lsarelul Jo al?lsa eql alealc ro e4nbce ol (c) ro 'g alnpaqcs
ug u.norp suopdacxo ol?uprlle o1 (q) ro;oaraq stuaruannbar eql WI,r flduroc o1 (u) qUuJ poot ut Suqupapun ul uoartq a.uull
-ar q perrmr4 ssol pnpe ro; fluo puu roJ pellluutoc sa;cyyod ro fc11od Jo ruloJ aql q pornsul Jo uolunJop er{t rapun papnlc
-ul sanred qcns pue parnsul pasodord paureu aq1 o1 r(po aq pqs 1uau4!u:uoJ s5;l rapun {ueduo3 eq1 1o r{rJpqul 'E
'suot1qnd11g pue suolllpuoJ sseql Jo € qderterd ol luensrnd pelrncut ,fisnop-ard
{1ryqe11 uorg i(ueduroS arll a olar }ou ileW luorupuoure q.ns lnq 'f18w.prorcu tuarullrruroJ sttlf Jo fl olnpeqrs pueruu Auru
uoiirioirt ru iueduoC oqr
-'ro11eir raqlolo iuyrp aira,rpe 'oiuurqurncui 'uiq 'tcagap qcns ,(rn 3o atpel,tou:y 1un1cu sartnbce osr,n
-roqlo duudruoX aq1;! ro'duuduroJ eql ot e8pq,tourl qcns esolrsrp llBrls pernsul paeodord aq131 'aSpalmou1 l{rns esoltsp, os o}
parirsul pasodola iqi'go arnneg Iq peilpn[ard s! ,,tuudriro3 aq1 gualxe aql ol uoaraq ecuuJlar jo lc? l(uu urorJ Suqpser aBeurep
ro ssol Iuu ro; ,(llllqBll ruory pe aller ag IIetF {uudruo3 eq1 'tu11p,vr u1 {ueduroC oql ol aEpalnou:1 qcns esolrslp o} II?J lJ?tls pue
';oerei1 g ep[aqcg q ir,rro{s
-esoqr
ueql ieqlo lueuqJunuoC s!r{t {q pararroc uo-raq1 e8e8troru ro lsarolq ro et?Na aql Sullcag;u
roleu;iqtb io [ai1c-aara,rpe 'ecuirqtuircuaiuall 'lcajop ,iui go aEpil,nou:1 pnpe seirnbcz ro s?q pemsul pasodotd aqt 31 '7,
'luarrnr$u! flpncac raglo ro 'peap lsn4'lsnrl Jo poop epnpq J1uqs 'qoreq pesn uaq,n '..eBu81rout,, ulel or{I 'I
sNo|lvrndtIs crNV sNo tlroNoc
'duuduro3 oql Jo llnuJ eql lou q selclod ro fcqod qcns ensq ol 3rnIIeJ agl leql papuord 'smcco 1snJ re erlsltl,$ 'enss! IIBTIS
JoJ polllrurxoc salcnod ro {c11od aq1 uoq!$ Jo Joereq elep e rlcoJJo eql reUE sq}uou xls 3lEuluuol pue-es903 lleqs repmolal{ suoll
-uinqo puu r(1ryqu1i p puu abuamiul afip 3o sepq6d 16 dc11od- qcns Jo ocucnss! arll ol &?u$4lard sr 1uaru1ltutuo3 qq;,
'luouasoropue luonbesqns Ag Jo
lueuqltuluo3 snfl Jo eluBnssr eql Jo eunl eql 1u raq11a'{ueduoS eqt fq;oareq V aFpeqcs ur pelrasul uaeq a Bg JoJ po}l8utuoc
ea1c11od ro {cqod aq13o lunoue aql puB parnsul pesodord aql go rqquapr aqt ueq,$ IIuo allcoJJa 0q fPtls luatllllrrruro] sltll
. Toeraq suol1qnd11s puu suoplpuoC aql ol pue g
pue V selnpeps;o suoppord ar{l ol lcalqns 11e iroyaraql seiruqc puu srunpuud aqg;o luaurled uodn 'y alnpetps ul ol perralor
io paqlrceip pril-aqr ur. ,iqoreq pere oc lseralq ro etupa aqt;o a5fuatrour ro reuid sE 'V alnpaqrs ul pou?u pemsul pasodord
oql Jo ro EJ 14 'V elnpaqrs ul pegJluapr sB 'e3uurnsul e$!l Jo selcllod ro
^cllod
sll enssr ol slluuroJ Aqel3q 'uollEreplsuoc
olq?npA u .ro;'{uedruoS eqr papc rnaraq'uotlerodror ?loseunlq ? 'VIOSSNNII4I dO A111ydI,tlOC 1ICNVU1SNI gTI11,
slosE uulw'qpdeeuull l ;o iueduog lcolg e
vrosrNNr[1ll ro
^Nvd^ol
rcNvunsrul rrrl
\
.:..........
.:....t. . "
rcNVUnsNl nfllvrosrNNrlll ro
^NVdwol
'Aeu 0461 'rN3ll[lmr^lo3 Nollvlcossv 3lJ'll cNVl Nvclu]l,llv gtlz ZSSZ urjoj WtI
AL"fA t:r:r1"1 f1 ITl,lENl
|II:HET|ULE A
Apr"1 icati*n l'lc'" V7?#L'
Fnr' I nf 'tr'n'ati r: rr firrf i'
* t*-:ha r'g* s -
Bulrrer' F*i icl
FnELIr4 riHPfrRT s75. {}o--TfiTAi--* $75"Crft
"i tli th r*r;r' r.snrittarf ,::€ pl ease r.ef Lf,r. t* V7?fr{1.
1" E*'f ective Itate: Jul r 3l " I'i.r*5 at *! 0.1 A,l"l.
2. P*l icy t r-r lr€ i gsrii.",J r a.*d r"r'{'r"asgd Irrsr"tr'ed !
tJu!rr*r's F*l i '::'tFc,r.m Et-1?7{r {Anrend{?,J 1*-17-7{:r}
Pr.c'pr'sed I nsr"tr'ed :
RI:TBERT l^J, l:iALVIN arr,:J FIAFY F. fiALVIN
3" Th* estate r-r f ilf 1:p.L:.st in th* I a.nd descr.ibe,J *r rEf er'red tr inthis. L:*nrnrl tnrerrt arlj ,:r-.ver.*d her'eirr is;
A Fee
4. Titl* t* the estat+ r,r' irrtr*r.est {c'v*r.ed her.ein is at the'ef f ectiv* ,late h€r.e,:tf veste,J irr;
RfiFERT i.l" GALVIf.I an,rJ I'IARY Er. ']AL.VIN
5. The larrd r.ef €f.red {:,: irr this rl:*nrrfiitnre nt is ,Jescr-.i h,*,J as
f r, I I *rrrs "'
LflT 1:, FfiiLlBIrIVISir:t{ frF BLBt::l"i 3 ANIJ A FART r:rF r:i:itt!: t:FiHLf.:
NRIVE" VAIL VILLAI:H,. FIR*T FlLIN[i" AI::(:LIRTIIFII: TI:I THE Rf:I::ilRTIETi
,, PI-AT THFFEI:IF" I:I:ILJhITY I:IF FAGLE, :iTATE |iF I::I:ILI:IRATII:I" TfifiETHrR !dITHA FARI:E[- fiF i]RI'ilNN I'l{]RE FARTI|::LII..ARLY nE:3I:RIFEn f;5 FI:ILLI:I["I5;
, SEI-:ThI!OJII.IG AT * FI:ITT.{'i LfiI:ATEN fiH THE EASTERLY LIhIT I:'F LTIT J.:J,
RE::ltJBfrIVISIr:N tlF BL-r:i;:1,;5 ANn A FAftT tiF rjLlRE L-:ttEEp.. liFl1 , VAIL
VILLAIJF" FIR.;:T FlL]:ITI}, Af:I::tIRfITNI-:i TTI THE RTI:SRIIFI.I FLAT THEREIJF,
I:I:ILINTY I-lF EAGLE" STIiTE ilF I:I:iLI:IRANB" hJHiI::H IT :JI5,r:}5 FEET
ST.IUTHI,JEiiTEftLY ':IF TI-{Ii: T'INRTHEA::TERLY ':I:IRN€R I:IF t"I:IT 1:T; THEHT::E
SfiUTHEASTEELY IiN A I.-lhIE FARAL.LEL IdITH THE NfiRTHHRLY LINH flF LI'T,.: A T'I5TAI'II::E I:IF {'.:.i::J FEET; THHN|:E S|:ILITHi,{TSTEFII.Y t:'N A LINE
FARALLEL I,IITH THE E.I:IIJTERLY LINE OF LI:IT }:" A TIISTANI:E TIF 4:.76
A 1.. I A L: r:.r l't f,.1 1 1, r'1 F" f.l 1'
l:i::HEftltt-tr A
Appi i c;r.t i r,rr i'J*. U;i1?i:)/:,
FHET; Tt-{}:1.1i::H I'tLrtlTHl4ftTrFil..-y L:iN A LIf,]E FAH6t..L_EL tJI t-tt 1t-iE.
NlrRTl-.lERLY LINL: frF l_ijf 1", # trI::;Trqt".il::F_ ':lF ,::r"::i; FEET I -iHF_.i,ir::i:
Nr:tRTHEA:::1'till_Y AL.r_iNr:i rHF EA:jTEFiLy L"iilE r:rF L[iT i;, A [iI::;Tf:,i{i:E r:rF
4'-f.7tt FFET Tfi Tl.|E Fl-rLH-f r:rF" ttEfiif,Jf'tIl..lij.
FiL.TA ililf"t fi1: Tt'l F-r.t 1
lir:t{Flrl-ll.."i: Fr-.:!.
{ Fi* q r..r i r'sr',}rrtE ) ftpsl ics.ti c'r'i hl':, V;"i'fJi,
Tfre f r'l l,:,rui r,3 a r...: th€ !- il q u i r. e nrt: n t s tr: l, r: r:rrtTrFl ir-,1 ui tl-r :
i. Paynr*rrt t,r ,:r' t*r. tl'ra ac{*Ufrt +t thc, sr.;}.rrt,:,r.s *i-. l.r !i r. t E a. sr ,:, r. s: {,.Fthr: ir-rl I {r'!-!s i'J.*r.a I i
'_i
n f c, r. th*l ..:stat.,: r,r. int*r.*sf t,: h*
insr:r'e,J.
i;'-. F'r',:p.*r' i. rr E t r' r-lsre rr t { s i {r'*ati.ns the *st€.t,:, r_,r. i_nte r.d?Ft t,: he
insr-rr'ed rnr.JEt be eriLa,:r.,tte,J an,J ,lulv .l:i l*,J **r. rer*r,Jr t,:,-lli t:
r:tl-lf'lTY
'::LERf'::::; Af,Ji_t IIE'::f'Ri-rEFi5 F(Et;rt...t:FlE .FtITt_tHi'J Af,frFE:;:fE::-; t:J!.j
til:r[:t-lP4tii{ l"$ :iENT Fr:rF{ RHr]:irF:r-rI i''Jn r r
<r ,
At..'iA r:: Dt1 t-] ITf,t E: HT
..::{:HErl_rL[ F-:
{[:rr*ptir'rrs ] App'l ifatiiur! hlr, V'l't't'-t lt
Thr:r Ftrl i':i, +r- prl ici+s l:,:' t, r,= issue,J uil I rt,ntairr e::.ir1::r"t ir,ns t,r t!-l1r
'l:t i I c'rrri. rr:r urrlsss th* Fa{r* ar.€ disp,:s*d ,rf t* the satisf arti,,:rr ,:i:
the ll:'lgrparrr'"'
1, i;tarr,Ja.r'd Ll:r*ept i c'rrs 1 tl-rr.,ruah ii rr-.i rrted *n th* cr,vi:r. sh€,.?t.
{-' " f a:,,:*s an,J agg*ssrr*r't l:s n,:,t .r,*t ,J r.1,i ,lr. pa.r.a_hle an,l s''*f 1a.i
assessnle!'rts r r t '!.*i ,:er'ti{ied t* tfrr' Tr.e;lgr:r.,i,r..'-.. otf i. f r",
' 7, Arrr" unpaid ta:":es ,:' r. ;r9FiigEff!€r!t$ aFai.nst sai,l l arlj.
i:i, Lieris f ,:r. r:npai.d rla. !::er' af,d 5 € !-r€,!-. rfrar.$*s, if a.nr.,
p. RIr:iH-f ilF FftnFftIETr:rR r:-rF A UEl,! i:rF L.r:lfrtr llr Er{IllAr:: T Attrl itHFlr:it/F: H].:::i t:rl;;l:
THtrHE.Fftr:rFl ,jHlrLtLn TH[: ::rAt'l8 rJEi FLit-rt]it -t-fr rF F.ii:Tti:ATE: Lrtl I ruTr F::iEt:T THii F,F:EH I:iL.*;A5 RH::;EFIVEn I FI LIN I Tr:n STATE:;: F,ATTNT RFr::r:iRtil::[i .-r'.-r I .r. ]. IL., 1t!i'i?,i , I I.,1 SO*i-.:. 48 AT
FlA[iE 4?5"
L*, RIr:iHf r:iF t",Ay FtrFj ul: "t-[:HE5 {rR cAr,JRLil r:i:it\t,j;}.Rll,::TEil B'; THE AUI-Hi]ftI]"y flF Tl-lE
l-l$.lIT[:.I.J :iTATE::: A:r RF:::iEltVEn IH Lii!ITEn :iTATE::; trATEf.iT F;Et:trHIrELl ,-rr-rl r 1ii" lr:ri,r1? It,l
F{int; 4t:l r}T FAj:iE 4.7ti
!. 1," FE':;Tf1Ii::--]. 1:'::rl'll; tjFlIr::!i Iii:i f.lr:rT r::r:rttTAIt',t A F'l$tFEITL|RE uR F|HVERTHR [:t Al.t,;iH" Fl"t.t-TIHITTiN|f F:E:jTRIi::rIi:it,jt, ]F ANy, FA:iEt nt{ F:A[H, i::Ol-i:.rR" ligL_IifIr:!tJ, *R r{ATIttl,JAL
.l-rFilr:i1l{' dlg {:r:ll.lTAihlf:lt If'j II4:STRL|HFNT REt:r_rRIlFr-t 6\rrguE{- 1i_ir L1;}€,:1" j: H E{tilri': i74 AI
F'AijjE 17'?,
PRiIFEitTY A::; Si.iiltdl'l i:rt,l THE REL:t:jRt'EIl FL"ftT r:itr A
'-iE5t-t*rrIV1.::Ii:rl,j
fri: Bt_r:[:]l::"; Arun A
FAF:T I:!F LiI:IFiL. I:I?HH},I I.IFIVF" VAIL.. VILLATiH F TRST rT[.. II.,JiJ"
13, UTILITY F-A::;El'1ul'lT:i ftEr:riRtrEl.l FErrRr'rFrRy 1?, 117/::l Ii.J F[r-it; 1i:i5 At" F,AuE lj!i AN|r ii.,l
Ft_-tt:rF:: 185 AT FArjE :t1;,7"
L4. TrFip,lEi, fl:tif,lfrITIr:tFj5 At,tt] FF:r:rvI..iIi:rl,lr:i r:tF F/AFiTy f,lALt.. ArjRHE14Hl,lT REL:irRfrELi rJ,:: ti,h,er.Cl:}' 11ir/:,:: IN Bfifji.:: t7i:; Ai FAi:iE :;77 *i\in iht Eil:il:ili i7F Al" F,A|:H ::l:i ANir REr::r:rEIrF_[l
.FFBRLIfiRy if.r, 11t(-,5 if.j Er:rilt. 1:]fj AT FA!jE rt{--i:j: Af,J[i IH SfJr:rH: 1:3S AT F:'Ai:iE 4.i]ar,
a
UJ
uJ
IL
F
x
UJ
o-
atuF
z
z
l",
t3
I
I
I
I
I,
IYteE
IEz
l=
lotz
F
z
a
Uz
E
J
q
z
E
z{
s
x.2
6s
\
F
;l
z
I
td
I
I
Ll
F
F
F
a
z
z
F
a
,t
F
F
F
J
=z
U
LJ
a
uJ
IIJII
=
IJJ
J
6
ul
(L
z
ulJ
z
^J
3
I
I
I
I\tlF)lOINl
c!l
rl
;
=ZILoo6z>o
E()aulo
(r
UJz
uJ
=>rE
-rE\ ur
l=l aol\t\J<
z
E
FO
a<5RrQzLL<
;-ot()
Fr Ol
Eadt!
CE
z
Eo
z
tr
ul
=!!lz
zz
F!+s9EH6 f-2Eoe
=E;qExf; !8srutu<OZ
ao
a?zFA;ur?
= l rUFZ p=d elsE iUH5"+6 35;o(,(Jrza)
z
F
o
=
z
F
-
U)z
IUl
J
?E
t;qJ
LL
o-
F
FIo
z
o5
LIJ
3
J
(ra\t
oz
F-
=t
uJ
o-
oz
F()
IlJ-l
E
ulF
o
z
z
rn Y
=<d)o
=z
O. LL
i6iar-Oi
r.,1 ilil=
trIX
cq,
E
CLoo
otr
.tc3
E
E
o
E
=E
lrJ
o-zIF()
:)&Fazoo
z
o
3
m
-E=l
=tr
o
FoJ
tl
T1tl
LtJ)!
)
a
, \\tlll
u..
LU
z
m
--)
{
-J\s
IJJ
=4
a
3
<l
I
5 F
\o
\
-\
x
N
UJ
E"
I
I
I
I
l*D
F.
Sr
i.
J
F
\:(
d$
_sq
{
d>l
(tsl
trl
l-.
r./l sss'v1I.l"
Xci
nru
tlq)lflr
fli:l<t F>t (J
=Etr
an
t!
ax.oo{
=
d
o
LIJ
oo
=
Ea
utl
uJl
ol
:l
al
>l
=tr
atu
oo
?
I(L
F
IY
-,IE
F
TIJ
ts-()t
tq#t
a t!<\Sfrfq-E
<oC)F
t<gp
(JO
z. J-
=#:zrro
i6YF
F3-Fi,z
=g
F
g
rJz
J<()o 9).rrr LIJ:o
!n
> = J;4
<FA <-:l7r-F' _<c 5J
-ia ^:<-?7:
=a'.r?l-'/
,"ia !?'rrl4J; ^ o r, ,.4i..';ii<c e51.7.?=:i. <;-
:4FF:ioU<U
<lJnZ:,.: i';i:-c;:iItu 4.
"t 1c'.1 :i
L .. < I
O>_,/t< 3 i3de!<lt<]J
rl-
rg tk
lol
tl
oa
F
FIz
=
z
z
ol
U)
LU
LL'
tr.
F
Eul
o-
oz
E
UJ(L
uJ
oz
zz
t...,
l(-)
ItrIr!
rcttzro
rCO
ll.l
z
J
UJ
Jzoz
(J9zemo>z
=r :)
dP
Jdfi(J(J=
=Ei
COUJ>
fr!tr
F
(!,
(L
t!o
l,!
o-
F
ie
:f.f E
I(/F
ic€:z€s\e:/ UlcE c),/l Jl> F)JtrE
=*
7-=
tt.t
=:
o-oz
oJl
()
I()
z
a
-F
TJJ
att,
u-
L
Etu
J
F
z
6
J(L
=-
IJJ
=
ut
UJ
tr
E
c(
oc
=u.it
IJJEz
6
LLIo
6
LU
d
z.
ut
o
z
J
f(D
a
FoL!
UJ
z
to
)
2
I
LU
NO[Vn rvA
!
o;ZZrLoooh o- AV
= r >:le.9 oE
U'OE.zt-oO|.J9.(JzH(!<al 0-J;" *+x ilc-z
dN(j
GI
z
F
)
ou)
o-l
oa
?
LU
z
9tr
o
z
F
LUF
=UJz
zz
syaH6 fFIUtZOttTH> s >[EO==JultsS F9'ooa;.ouJ!u<Oz@G6Z:l
FC,<n9z
= 'ttt 'l' Y3 l rHF9 H.z-6!;:qHiEH.-|Jl:>9t!;OrlOOoou-za)
.,ltrz
:lz
tr
o
=()
O
zI
F
J:)az
ul
F
F
6
z
ttt
=)
?
uJz:<
9
T.
F
z
trJ
LU
z
--)
I
I
It_
lo-
I
I
I,)U'Iu{
d
:i
=(J
I
I
I
t.li- l.o-'l
"l
I
14
u"l
CIcIq
-{
=|Otr
I
t-L
I'l
"l
I|.
L
lo'I
I
IoltJtluj
ct
<lI<tF>l -
Eg
</lu.l
E]o
<l
a
>l
Gn
UJfoo
1l
<l
>l tr.
tt,
o
=t
oo
a
:r
o-
=()
UJz
=o
F
C)
UJL
:E
C)
<Ftc)UJ<z&
LLJ F
()
<o(JF
;<
-r2
L!oo
E(,c'zts-
=<<&
)z(rO
C)
<;
YF-z ()3s
Y,Z,=.3
F(-\
E
F
2:oU
TY
L!
:EF
J<(J<, ILIJ UJJO
trt]n
o.'
t,
rru$ecnoN REQuEST
WED THUR FRI
TOWN
4- ilJ - -GDATEFT | /l JoBNAME
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
PMAM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH i D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
T-l /'|-'l
,- -_{, ., ./,. &,trry/ ,.'
t<{E aFTNAL _\-/- 7 r-
ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER D HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
-
f'l r-r
tr FINAL o FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
JOB NAME ( /at 6t
AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
' "l l/ ,,1
IN}ECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
THUR
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING aV ) /'1t-< lot',rri.t +t''l4.t^ tr ROUGH/WATER
tr GAS PIPING
tr FINAL
/\"4a/1t E .rL y'-A t 'i -\'f Lui,r /U,/!,,q L__ E>,;z; t,trt *.t rt Ztt l /^--i,r_l
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH
-
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
COBRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
oatt ,/ /L',,'/ \:' ,, .;' : tNSpEcroR
t zJ ( "'l ! , y,/ ,?. t.- -<.L .t
J\--'-.ts
iHIrr
<,-L a-ar.ir-I'-<9.,!r
F-< .. | 7.,'
=:F
..o"is.^1l{;;;iuio9ipe! 7_ - 11j<ozE
A:4:/.^J; c <;ii E * a;Q <(J<ukl z:,;1 1;6i;.-:
;<U33si3lF,"ot'o> *C,<a*-tl d ! <
'1<JJ
l_
.F
t6
I
I
I
I
?!l
r.f
I
I
I
I
a
LLJ
t.|-J
LL
=E
uJ
oz
b
=lu(L
UJF
z
z
E
F
t-Iz
o
zzo
l-
lcJ
IE
t(5tzlo
ur
z)
Llto-
Jzoz_-oze
=zJc)o-L
F
c
UJ
r.L
LU
F
ot
E
o6
oE
c)
E
Eo(t
o
oz
F
C)
UJ-)oE
.'., 1't-l
:: I-:: .l,l
-:" I
LIJF
o
ts
=E
lJ.lo-zot-(J
=EFazo(J
trnn
J."i5
=8ft
- trt v
6il>
a
LL'
LIJtL
f-
UJ
al
F
F
F
LUJ.ul
z
(D
l
o-
U]
LUtLz
tr
LU
LI.l
E
oe
c)
=ul
tuEz
6
llJo
F-6
Ll'lo
(L
2
LIJJ
ts
EL!
z
o
-
(D
z
tD
fJ
NOt.[VntvA
z
F
)
=(nz
L!
I
uJ
LU
ll-
o-
F
I
z
od
F
B
a
LIJE
z
tr
z
k
UJ
zz
s9AHa f
-26y,RE 5 }6E
P 3 rpeASEoZ
co
a?zF'anY.z-:r-5*6 - 2i I
i 1= r ssYESHb;o(Jo-z(J
z
f,zo
F
o
t;
=z. z tL
F^Ozq 5 :e-89 0f,
thoEZ>-(Joar?QzXu-<oq ilrJ -*3 sFot
dNO
E>(r
--G)ituS
'= dl 61-:._ <
<n
IJJz
:<
rF
z
J
l!
Jo
F
J
tu
=z
"'r
(!
z
UJ
o
F E >F
tr
ul
o
o,
L(-tr
a
tl-lEoo
a g
u.rtoo
)a c
uJEoo
a oa
l!,
o
a
I
o_
t_()
LUz
=
F-(J
LUFr
<F&()
Lr.J <z&
I.IJ FOZ
JC<o(JF
t<
.Y l-AzUJO
(9ozl-
=<Z,E]FJZo-g
<i;
:iF7a)?<
E
=-l- ft.
b=
J<c)(Js?
ui qJ
JO
nn!
:.. :f f "!i,F YYTln; : ,I:'-4.'EF:
t,., t!
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Project Application
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
APPROVAL DISAPPHOVAL
Zoning Administrator Chief Building Official
L
!:
ti
!
I
|:
,l:
ll
J
i'
l,,tl
tl
tlii
I
f'p9/555=-2 v/NDaA/ p{Drfl oN5To F]V|O}-E- FJtiMffiR t2-
-ffr= yXtw/-rm
r4.KrruffiV A]A7c w, lwb\A-lt rctn 81b51
. 'di ., ^^ u,,.,^^-. t tf
p ppr-berroN FoR BUTLDING e;rnlit 'b,il,-\
THE
licant
:t';l' /l{ c:'
fill in this
VAIL
section onl
.k
0)
Bo
1)
(d
o
dod0 i0()()
,1 tr
Building address
Date of .A pplication
AITIE
y' ddres s
City
City.Tel. No.
Narne fltl 'tt{L
Address
City
(Circle
l. Type of construction I, fi, III, IV, V
2, Occupancy group A, E, C, D, E, F, G,
H,i,J
BUILDING INFORM} TION
New A ddition
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
Total floor area ( sg ft)
No. of stories Ht.
Nc. of r oorns --No '
No. of water clos ets
baths
No . of Farnilie s
COMMENTS DATE & SIGNAT
Alteration -Y Repairs
Type of occripancy-
_f rea of Lo1 1vS..e*.f $fntuy
ESTIMATED COST
OF CONSTRUCTIONf i, bNO. O-O
(Materials & Labor)/
+)
oo
d
I.l
fi
h
c.)
F
4<pr/. tA
;f, F{
t-r -lr\ (l
rq ilE{F4C
F{Yo5
^2X4q)',naI
'Za
F.r VZttZ'st<&
"lO
INSPECTION RECORD
(f or Departrnental use only)
APPROVA LINSPECTIOhT
FOUNDATIONS
t /eftv
lock B4c
^\
{
(u
N
,, tlJ-vl
A,$l-.\l*l
t'
0.'
(0
L
o
4
+'
I
."l
d
Q)
dh
-o\
llt
d
U
0'
$
C)
oa
cL
f.r
o:
q)
d
{)o
l{
1..
a)
c
o
t'1
{
(,,
d
a
o
o+,d(J
+)t{
CJ
il
!cd
tU
(J
o
tr
o
tr
o
o
lU
o
t{
rl,F
h
P,,
+rp"
al
c)
I(JAon
(Jt
dO
6+.trodc)
h! r-.1
l< a1
dora o'i
5o l.lFok0)
f6orrotr
11.1 "o11 (! '-{at'i<;5.o
z
Hu
14
t4l(,
ztd
zt{
J
tr]
0)
tu
o
bo
U]
()
d
t-.1
U)
.,j
n.
t,.
,.q
(,
(d
P"t{
11 c:
CJlr
p-,
I
I
I
.i
(;r)
o
rJ
ri
e)t;
r0
d
ql
"cJti
rJ
d
C
(::
;j,:l
TJ
('}
F:
t1
a
r.)
o
t1.)
L]
c'l
f.jc{
(tl
o
d..tr
::"'
l&l
tr.RAMING
FIN^ L
ROUGHo
a
r.iNI L
ROUGH
6 FINA L
ROUGH
FINT L
ht
tslu
Uu
s
tla" '-'i'ar' a: riec rrta: i-he rnai [r re35ol.t \,Jas icr reeu-6stt nq +-he alts'ii,0r. .h,r:trt'",]r'n -<a'ci: w::, 'r-t, ; r'r'::-ecse -iile feell'rq of "cu-,citior.:" il +.he rc-i:; c:'',r. ,.,_,1 . r-r:f ,, .-r '::a: to ',ire pt"r1,.-<ical nrc;ns oi Lrpenrna o0oi's. The l^eply t.idS -'irer :ne oo.il^: ir€ -"ic,- i
mourrted anci folcleo.
Vi el e rncved and Schultz leclngg!_lo qlp_ryle ti4 requesr p_qr ihqjlqiiircllp_. \tcieur;rc 7-fr ir,favor.
A A reouesl- ior s tde, r'ear an4 fqqW!_1-_iq slge,j'egI_3nci watercourse sefb.ic( variances rn orcier tons'\ci a ceci' ard i'o:- tub aooiffin on uni r 5 pf Va iI I orlntromes ^ t or-nncfl-rr.t:,.f Vail Townhonle-E Lot 5',rq5rib!! LCr q!_qf E&!! s,_l.1l\lil.l-!ge |1e Lft'flllJl!._ Applicani: TJ Pritzker
5. A l eqqesi-i,01 G_BFA and se-rback variances in oroer to construc'u arjcijtionso't riri --s l2A .no ]ZS of .-ne Vl j I fi, -r-*^^ i+ r ^+ r r
-v. 1r_1 iTrlJ t 11 r rc_.lpFiic a n. =*{#H€#**TJ'=
Re s u b o r B r k 5'
The staff presentaiion'was given b.v Kriite* lritz y,hc stareci 'that the staff, .-:..i'a::l; rr,lir,ceo a::roval ,:or ihl Sioi se_baCk var.i anCe derrial of ;he GRFA var--i;.r,ci.
f.ui:. S:gir-r:r!: r.s!leseniing :h: appiicani, qave a presen*"aricn on beha.l f of +,h:ai'p1ican-r. Discussior, folicrring concerning i",ow 0rdinance { appl ieo to ttr.:i pi;llsai.Gorcjon Pierce-spoke in an att-entir'u to help explain the applicant's intent ano thepropcsal's relationship ro the orci inance. Piper poirrtecj'ou*" ihat 0rdirrapc€ 4does rrot allow for mult,i-family oeck enclosures. He st.ated that original11r thePEC wanted multi-family exieribr renrccel s acoressed, however. lnul'ui -iam.i ly'exterior-rerlociels !!ere excl uded from the ordinarrce- Donovan felt thai thefe ilas no diffeierrcebetvieen this prcpcsal and the Sancjstone 70 proposal. Affeldt felt that this wasanother special privilege case. Viele felt the issue was identical io the onea'r- Sa|osr-one 70. He personally did not have a problem wjth the proposal anci felti: wcs a good orre ior',he cor rn,inity. Viele felt tire pfC neecis clear dire:rionon :he issue of mulr,i-famiry cieck Lnclcsures from the counc.i l.
!i-fe{i! n?,ve! il!-\llgle selqrygd-_to ap-prove ihe setback vari ance because of 'rte
:11..]i9 U' se:rboc!,_ ano to deri"v _,_ne CRFA onll_ol_ngLof qreciai ry1i ieoe.- -Ih? v0-"e wes 5 in favor ano Z (Er.iner onO-Hoptins) opposeO.
q
fr
Rcss Davis, representing several of the owners of cther townhouses, feit thatthe *'ovrnhouse associat.i on could reject the proposal due to ihe faci that thatthjs area was a gerreral common element. patteir said that he would require thesignature of the concjominium association before the staff would accepi ti.ru oppiica--:rr,.Segerberg requested the application be tablec indefiniLe1y. patten s+-a*-eo lh'atDavis rvoulo be notified if anc when the application appeaied on the agenda inthe f u*-ure. []oricvanilcved qnd Af fel dt secondeci to tabie th. item _r no_g11_11e.l,v.The vc,:e was 7--C.--
*r
NqiL, E1ft,,krt,, (fuf^@ iltwkil*)
Ross Davis, Jr.
Attorney at Law
Ross Davis, Jr.
Cyrus G. Allen III
Jacqueline A. Flater
Suite 307
Vail National Bank Bldg.
P.O. Box 190
Vail, Colorado 81658
Telephone:
1303) 476-2474September 10, 1985
Ur. Peter Patton
Planning Department
Town of VaiL
75 South Frontage RoadVail, CO 81657
RE: Application of Thomas J. Pritzker
Dear Peter:
This letter will serve to confirm my understanding of our
conversation at the PLanning Corunission l{eeting held on
Monday, Septenber 9, 1985.
The application has been tabled at the request of Kurt
Segerberg, Architect for the applicant, until such time as
they have obtained approval fron the CondominiunAssociation for the inprovements.
It is also my understanding
deals with the modificationthat the written consent ofprior to the continuance of
requi red .
that because the applicationof a condominium general elementthe Condominiun Associationthe application process will be
As the tabling of the application is for an indefinite periodit is also my understanding that you will notify my officeof the tine and date for the next meeting if the applicationis not abandoned.
If you have any an lease contact my office.
S ince r
S, tJ
Joy R. Hilliard
Barbara C. We1les
Danief L. l4osley
RD: ns