HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5 LOT B SLIFER BUILDING 2004 FACADE REMODEL-PEC LEGALIe
'Flanning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Crlorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 f ax: 97 0.479,2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: SUFER BUILDING VANANCE pEC Number: PEC04000B
Project Description:
REMODEL FRONT PORTION OF THE SLIFER BUILDING. WILL REQUIRE A SITE COVEMGE
VARIANCE.
Pafticipants:
OWNER SLIFER BUILDING LLC OZl09l2OO4 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
APPUCANT SUFER BUILDING LLC 02/09/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
Project Address: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL Location:
230 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
Legal Description: Loh B Block:5 Subdivision: VAILVILLAGE FILING 1
Parcel Number: 210108229002
Comments: See Conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTTON
Motion By: George Lamb Actionr APPROVED
Second Byr Rollie Kjesbo
Voter 5-1 (Cahill Oppposed) Date of Approval: 03/08/2004
Condifons:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Cond: CON0006378
That the applicant reduces the size of the proposed awning to extend no more than
four feet from the face of the building.
Planner: Warren Campbell pEC Fee paid: $500.00
Project Name: SLIFER BLDG. ALTEMTION
Proiect Description:
PEC Number: PEC040013
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Developrnent
75 South Frontage Road. Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 97 0.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
REMODEL FRONT PORTION (WEST ELEVANON) OF THE SLIFER BUILDING.
Participants:
APPUCANT SUFER BUILDING LLC 03/10/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
OWNER SUFER BUILDING LLC 03/10/2004 phoner
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
Project Address: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL Location:
230 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
Legal Description: Lott B Block: 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE RLING 1
Parcel Number: 210108229002
Comments: See Conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote:
Conditions:
Chas Berhardt
George Lamb
7-0
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approvalz MlL2l2O04
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Warren CampbellPlanner:PEC Fee Paid: $650.00
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ORIGINAL
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
April 12,2004
A requesl for a minor exlerior alteration pursuant to Section '12-78-7, Exterior
Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for a commercial addition
to the Slifer Building, located at 230 Bridge StreeUlot B, Block 5, Vait Viltage 1"'
Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Rodney E. SliferPlanner: Warren Campbell
SUMMARY
The applicant, Rodney E. Slifer, is requesting a minor exterior alteration pursuanl to Section
12-78-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for a commercial
slore front addition to the Slifer Building, located at 230 Bridge StreevLot B, Block 5-C, Vail
Village 1" Filing. Per the Commercial Core I zone district the applicant is applying for a minor
exterior alteration to allow for the enclosure of an architectural "notch" in the west fagade of
the Slifer Building and install an awning which extends out over the proposed entry. Staff is
recommending approval of the requested minor exterior alteration subject to the findings
noted in Section lX of this memorandum.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
This minor exterior alteration request is to allow for the enclosure of an architectural "notch"
in the west fagade of the Slifer Building so that it mighl become interior retail space and the
addition of an awning over the relocated enlrance. A vicinity map depicting the location of
the Sliier Building in Vail Village is attached for reference (attachment A). The proposed
enclosure measures 4 feet wide by 4 feet 4 inches deep lor a total of 17.32 square feet. The
proposal is to relocate the existing entry and enclose a portion of the existing "notch" in the
fagade and install an awning over lhe new entry. Reduced copies of the proposal are
attached for reference which depicts the area to be enclosed (attachment B). A letter from
the applicant dated March 9, 2004, is attached for reference.
BACKGROUND
. This property is a part of the original Town of Vail which became effective by the
election of August 23, 1966, and the court order of August 26, 1 966.. On February 24, 1992, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a
major exterior alteration and a site coverage variance request for the Slifer Building.
The 1992 proposal added approximately 57 sq. ft. of site coverage to the slifer
Building, in order to allow for the construclion of approximately 53 sq. ft. of additional
first floor retail area, and 548 sq. ft. of new office space on the second floor of the
il.
I lt.
tv.
building, above the retail space. The 1992 site coverage variance approval allowed
the applicant to increase the existing site coverage by 1 .8%, from 92.1"h to 93.9%.
The Planning and Environmental Commission approved the applicant's site
coverage variance request, finding that the proposal was in compliance with the
Variance Criteria and Findings prescribed in the Municipal Code. The PEC also
found that the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the site coverage
regulation would result in a practical difficulty, as lhe site coverage regulation is
inconsistent with the goals and objectives outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan
and Urban Design Considerations.
On April 13, 1998 the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a major
exterior alteralion and a site coverage variance, to allow for a remodel and
expansion to the Slifer Building. That proposal added approximately 160 sq. ft. of
new retail floor area to lhe lower level of the existing building, removed a total of g
sq. ft. of real estate office floor area from the main level (Bridge Street) of the
building, and added 135 sq. ft. of new office floor area to the upper level of the
building. The proposal increased the total site coverage by 103 sq. ft. for a total of
3,129 sq. ft (97.1o/"). The "notch" was introduced to the design in order lo reduce the
amount of deviation required by the applicant for increased site coverage and to
comply with Design Review Board guidelines.
On March 3,2004,the Design Review Board (DRB) conducted a conceptual review
of the proposed exlerior alteration to the Slifer Building. In that meeting the DRB
commented on the awning, the moving of the front door, and the enclosure of the
"notch". The Board was fine with the movement of the door, but there was some
concern about a one-foot wide awning over the new window which is proposed to
replace lhe existing door. On the Board there was general agreement lhat the
"notch" could be enclosed and still mainlain the sense and feelwhich was created by
the building on the street. However, tvyo members believed that the proposal as
presenled was acceptable and lhe remaining two believed it should be enclosed by
approximately two feet.
On March 8, 2004, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a
variance for this property to have 97.4% sile coverage.
On March 17,2004, the DRB directed sraff to staff approve the project if the step
back of the "notch" was increased by six inches for a total step back of one{ool from
the adjacent fagade which will contain the new entry door.
ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
The PEC is responsible for evaluatino a proposal for:
Action: The PEC is responsible for tinal approval/deniat of a minor exterior alteration.
The PEC shall review the proposal lor:- Conformance with develooment standards of zone district- Lol area_- Setbacks- Building Height- Density- GRFA- Site coverage- Landscape area- Parking and loading- Compliance wilh the goals and requirements of the Vail Village Master
Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan, and the Vail Comprehensive Plan
- Compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Vail
Village Design Considerations with respect to the following:- Pedestrianization- Vehicular oenetration- Streelscape framework- Street enclosure- Street edge- Building height- Views- Service/delivery- Sun/shade analysis- The PEC's approval "shall conslitute approval ol the basic torm and
location of improvements including siting, building setbacks, height,
building bulk and ma$s, site improvements and landscaping-"
Design Review Board:
Action: The DRB has NO review aathority on a Major or Minor Exterior Alteration, but
must review any accompanying DRB application.
The DRB is responsible for evaluating the proposal for:- Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings- Fitting buildings into landscape- Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the
topography- Removal/Preservation of lrees and native vegetation- Adequate provision for snow storage on-site- Acceptability of building materials and colors- Acceptability ol roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms- Provision of landscape and drainage- Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory structures- Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances- Location and design of satellite dishes- Provision of outdoor lighting- Compliance wilh the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and design
considerations
Staff ;
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and
plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also
advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Staff provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff
evalualion of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a
recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates
lhe review process.
Town Council:
Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town council or by the Town council.
Town Council evaluates whether or not lhe PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials
and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision.
V.APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Zoning Regulations
Section 12-78 Commercial Core 1 (CC1) District (in part)
12-78-1: PURPOSE:
The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique
characler of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial
establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1 District
is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the
permiiled types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in accordance with the Vail
Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development
standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly
clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and
lo ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the
Village.
1 2-7 B-7 : EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MOD I FtCATIONS:
A. Subject To Review: The construction of a new building, the alteration ol an existing
building which adds or removes any enclosed floor area, the alteration of an existing building
which modifies exterior rooflines, the replacement of an existing building, the addition ol i
new outdoor dining deck or the modification of an existing outdoor dining deck shall be
subject to review by the Planning and Environmental commission (pEC) as follows;
1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building
owner's authorized agenl or representative on a form provided by the Administratoi.
Any application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized by the
condominium association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the
condominium association's declarations.
2. Application Contenls: An application for an exterior alteration shall include the
following:
a. A completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property
located adjacent to the subject parcel. A filing fee shall not be collected for any
exterior alteration which is only for the addition of an exterior dining decli;
however, all other applicable fees shall be required. The owner's list shalllnclude
the names of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property
owned by each, and a general description of the property (including the name ofthe property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the
condominium association's representative (if applicable). said names and
addresses shall be obtained from the current tax records of Eagle County as they
appeared not more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittal date.
b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies withtle vajl Village urban Design Guide plan and the Vail Village Urban Design
considerations, the Vail Village Master plan, streetscape Masler plan, and aiy
other relevant sections of the Vail Comprehensive plan.
c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the
property including the location of improvements, topography, and natural features.
d. A current tille report to verify ownership, easements, and other encumbrances,
including schedules A and 81.
e. Existing and proposed site plan at a scale of one inch equals len feet, (1" = 10'), a
vicinity plan at an appropriate scale to adequately show the project location in
relationship to the surrounding area, a landscape plan al a scale of one inch
equals ten feet (1' = 10), a roof height plan, and existing and proposed building
elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equals one foot (1/8" = 'l'). The
material listed above shall include adjacent buildings and improvements as
necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance with urban design criteria as
set forth in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, Vail Village Design
Considerations, the Vail Village Master Plan, the Streetscape Master Plan, and
any other relevant sections of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
f. Sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall
equinox (March 21lSeptember 23) and winter solstice (December 21) at ten
o'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) P.M., unless the Department Of
Community Development ol the Town determines that the proposed addition has
no impact on lhe existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be
used when preparing this analysis:
Spring/Fall Equinox Sun Angle
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Winter Solstice Sun Angle
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
40" east of south, 50" declination
42o west of south, 50" declination
30o east of south, 20'declination
30" west of south, 20" declination
g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a scale ol one-fourth inch equals one fool
(1/4" = 1') and a square tootage analysis of all existing and proposed uses.
h. An architectural or massing model of lhe proposed development. said model
shall include buildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties as
deemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model shall be as
determined by the Administrator.
i. Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the relationship of the
proposed development to adjacenl properties, public spaces, and adopted views
per Chapter 22 of this Title.
j. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the Administrator
or the Town Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). The Administrator
or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at his/her or their discretion,
waive certain submittal requirements if it is determined that the requirements are
not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the urban design
criteria, as set forth in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Vail Village
Design Considerations and any other relevant seclions of the Vail Comprehensive
Plan.
3. Application Date And Procedures2: complete applications for major exterior
alterations shall be submitted biannually on or before the fourth Monday of February
or the lourth Monday of september. subminal requirements shall include ail
information listed in subsection 42 of this section; provided, however, that the
architectural or massing model shall be submitted no later than three (3) weeks prior
to the first formal public hearing of the Planning and Environmental Commission. No
public hearings or work sessions shall be scheduled regarding exterior alterations
prior to the biannual submittal date deadlines. At the next regularly scheduled
Planning and Environmenlal Commission meeting following the submittal dates listed
above, the Administrator shall inform the Planning and Environmental Commission of
all exterior alteration submittals. The Administrator shall commence with the review
ol exterior alterations following this initial Planning and Environmental Commission
meeting.
a. A property owner may apply for a major exlerior alteration (greater than 100
square feet) in any year during which he or she shall submit an application on the
February or September dates as set forth in subsection A3 of this Section. Said
application shall be termed a "major exterior alteration".
b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applications {or the alteration of an existing
building which adds or removes any enclosed floor area of not more than one
hundred (100) square feet, applications to alter the exlerior rooflines of an
existing building, applications for new outdoor dining decks and applications lor
modifications to existing dining decks may be submilted on a designated
submittal date for any regularly scheduled Planning and Environmenlal
Commission meeting. Said applications shall be termed a "minor exterior
alteration". The review procedures for a minor exterior alteration shall be as
oullined in this Section. All enclosed floor area for an exoansion or deletion
pursuanl to this subsection A3b shall be physically and structurally part of an
exisling or new building and shall not be a freestanding structure.
c. A single property owner may submit an exterior alteration proposal which
removes or encloses floor area of one hundred (100) square feet or less on a
designated submittal date and will be reviewed by the Planning and
Environmental Commission at any of its regularly scheduled meetings.
5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental commission
shall be held in accordance with section 12-3-6 of this Title. The planning and
Environmental commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the
application with conditions or modilications, or deny the application. The decision of
the Planning and Environmental commission may be appealed to the Town council
in accordance with Section 12-3-3 of this Title.
6. compliance wilh comprehensive Applicable Plans: lt shall be the burden of the
lpplicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence belore the planning and
Environmental Commission lhat the proposed exterior alteration is in compliance
with the purposes of the CC1 District as specified in Section '12-7P,-1of this Article;
that lhe proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Vail Village Master
Plan, the Town of vail streetscape Master Plan, and the vail compreheniive plan;
and that the proposal does not otherwise negatively alter the character of the
neighborhood. Furlher, that the proposal substantially complies with the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Design Considerations, to include, but
not be limited to, the following urban design considerations: pedestrianization,
vehicular penetration, streetscape framework, street enclosure, street edge, building
height, views, service/delivery and sun/shade analysis; and that the proposal
substantially complies with all olher elements of the Vail comprehensive plan.
7. Approval: Approval of an exlerior alteration under subsections A5 and 46 of this
section shall constitute approval of the basic form and location of improvemenrs
including siting, building setbacks, height, building bulk and mass, site improvemenls
and landscaping.
8. Lapse Of Approval: Approval of a major or minor exterior alteration as prescribed by
this chapler shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approval
of the major or minor exterior alteration by the planning and environmental
commission unless, prior to lhe expiration, a building permit is issued and
construction is commenced and diligently pursued to completion.
9. Design Review Board Review: Any modification or change to the exterior facade of a
building or to a site within the CC1 dislrict shall be reviewed by the design review
board in accordance with chapter 11 of this title.
B. Compliance Burden: lt shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance
of the evidence before the design review board that the proposed building modification is
in compliance wilh the purposes of the CC1 district as specified in seclion i2-7P'-1 ot
this article; that the proposal substantialty complies with the Vail village design
considerations, and that the proposal does not othenryise alter the charaCter of t[e
neighborhood.
12-78-20: VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESTGN pLAN:
A. Adoption: The Vail village urban design guide plan and design considerations are
adopted tor the purposes of mainlaining and preserving the character and vitality of the
V,ail village (CC1) and to guide the future alteration, change and improvement in CC1
district. Copies of the Vail village design guide plan and design considerations shall be
on file in the departmenl ol community development.
Vail Village Master Plan
The Vail Village Master Plan is based on the premise that the Village can be planned and
designed as a whole. The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to beionsistentwith the Vail
village Urban Design Guide Plan, and along with lhe Guide plan, it underscores the
importance ol the relationship between the built environment and public spaces.
Furlhermore, the Master Plan prwides a clearly stated set of goals and objectives outlining
how the Village will grow in the future.
Goals for Vail Village are summarized in six major goal stalements. While there is a certain
amounl of overlap between these six goals, each focuses on a particular aspect of the
Village and the community as a whole. A series of objectives outlinb specific steps that can
be taken toward achieving each stated goal. Policystatements have been developed 1oguide the Town's decision-making in achieving each of the stated objectives.
The stated goals of the Vail Village Master Plan which pertain to this application are included
in Section Vlll of this memorandum, Criteria and Findings.
Vail Village Urban Design plan
This Guide Plan represents collective ideas about functional and aesthetic objeclives for VailVillage. Diagrammatic in nalure, the Guide plan is intended to suggest the nature of
improvemenls desired. lt is based on a number of urban design criterli determined to be
appropriate for guiding change in the Vail Village. The Guide plan is intended to be a guide
for.current planning in both the public and private sectors. Th6 pertinent portions of th; Vail
Village Urban Design Plan are include in Section Vlll of this'memorandum, Criteriaand
Findings.
ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning:
Land Use Plan Designation:
Current Land Use:
Develooment Standard
Lot Area:
Setbacks:
Fronl:
Sides;
Rear:
Building Height:
Site Coverage:
Landscape Area:
Commercial Core 1
Village Master Plan
Mixed Use
Allowed/Reouired
5,000 sq. ft.
Per Vail Village
Urban Design
Guidelines
60% at 33 ft. or less
40"/" al33 ft. to 43 ft.
2,578 sq. ft. (80%)
Per the Vail Village
Urban Design Guide
Plan
per Section 12-10-1 0
District
Existinq
3,223 sq. ft.
1ft.
0 ft./O ft.
0ft.
100% at 33 ft. or less
0% at 33 ft. to 43 ft.
3,1 29 sq. tt. (97 .1"/")
51.5 sq. fl.
Proposed
no change
no change
no change
no cnange
no change
no change
3,139.8 sq. ft. (97.a%)
no change
Parking:
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
per Section 12-10-10 .04 space (2.3
spaces/1,000
square feet)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Land Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Open Space
Mixed Use
Zonino
Commercial Core 1 District
Commercial Core 1 District
Outdoor Recreation District
Commercial Core 1 District
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Compliance with the Commercial Core I Zone District Purpose Stalement
According to the Official Town of Vail Zoning Map, the applicant's property is located in the
Commercial Core 1 Zone District (CCl). Pursuant to Section 12-78-1 of the Municipal
Code, the purpose of the CC1 Zone District is intended to,
"provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village Commercial
Area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly
pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core I District is intended to ensure
adequale light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted
types of buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail
o
Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe sile
development standards thal are intended to ensure the maintenance and
preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrian
ways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and
architectural qualities that distinguish the Village."
Staff Response:
Staff believes that the proposed improvements are in compliance with the intent of the
purpose section of the Commercial Core 1 Zone District.
B. Compliance with the Urban Design Guide Plan for Vail Village
Staff Response:
There are no specific sub-area concepls in the Urban Design Guide Plan for Vail Village
relevant to this proposal.
C. ComPliance with the Urban Design Considerations lor Vail Village and Exterior
Alteration Criteria
The Urban Design Considerations for Vail Village are intended to guide growth and change
in ways that will enhance and preserve the essential qualities of Vail Village. The Urban
Design Considerations are divided into two major categories: Urban Design Considerations,
and Architecture/Landscape Considerations. The following design considerations are crilical
elemenls of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and provide the criteria to evaluale
new proposals:
Urban Desiqn Gonsiderations
The Vail Village Urban Design Considerations are primarily the purview of the Planning and
Environmental Commission.
Pedestrianization:
The proposed minor exterior alteration will have no negative impact on the
pedestrian circulalion within Vail Village. The proposed addition will add
visual interest to Bridge street and improve customer access into the slifer
Building.
Vehicular Penelration:
Vehicular penetration and circulation will remain unchanged, as a resull of
this proposal.
Streetscape Framework:
Streetscape framework identifies two alternatives for improving the
pedestrian experience in the Village. These include the development of
open space, including landscaping along pedestrian routes, and the infill
1.
2.
3.
4.
developmenl of commercial slorefronts along pedestrian roules.
Landscaping softens the building edges and provides a colorful accent, while
commercial infill provides additional street-level activity and visual interest for
pedestrians. Upon review of the applicant's proposal, staff believes that the
minor exterior alteration will contribute positively to the overall pedestrian
experience along Bridge Streel. Stalf feels the proposed facade
improvements will enhance the overall appearance of the Village.
Street Enclosure:
The purpose of this design consideration is to ensure that a comfortable
relationship between the width of the street, and the height of the building, is
maintained. The proposed addition will result in a slight decrease in the
width of the streel at the first level of the building only. Currently, Bridge
Street is approximately 25 feet wide in front of the Slifer Building. Staff
believes that a comfortable relationship will be maintained between the width
of the street, and the heighl of the building, upon the completion of the
proposed minor exterior alteration.
Street Edge:
The design considerations encourage thal a strong, yel irregular street edge
be created along pedestrian slreets. An irregular street edge brings variety
and visual interest to the pedestrian experience. In response lo lhe concerns
expressed by the Design Review Board during the worksession meeting, the
applicant has made minor revisions to the plans and introduced greatel
articulation to the Bridge street facade. staff believes the irregular building
line of the proposed minor exterior alteration adds visual interest and will
have no negative impacts on the Bridge Street edge.
Building Height:
There is no proposed change to the building height. Staff believes the
existing building height is appropriate for this site and does not believe lhe
proposal will have any negative impacts on lhe area.
Views and Focal Points:
The proposed expansion does not affect any adopted or proposed Town of
Vail view corridors, nor does it negatively impact any focal points in the
Village.
Service and Delivery:
The proposed minor exterior alteration will not negatively impact current
service and delivery patterns.
5.
o.
7.
8.
Architectural/Landscape Considerations
The Architectural/Landscape Considerations are reviewed primarily by the Design Review
Board.
Roofs
The proposed addition of a copper standing seam roof above the proposed
"notch" enclosure will have positive impacts on the appearance of the Bridge
Slreet facade.
Facades
Staff believes that the proposed changes to the Bridge Street facade will
enhance the visual interest ol the building and add variety to the pedestrian
experience along Bridge Street.
3. Balconies
There are no balconies proposed as a part of this application
4. Decks and Patios
No decks or patios are proposed.
5. Accent Elements
To provide additional accent and visual interest to the building, the applicant
is proposing to install a awning over the new entry which has an atypical
design which will differentiate this entry form others on Bridge Street.
6. Landscape Elements
There is currently very little landscaping on the applicant's property. The
applicant is not proposing to add or remove any landscaping with this
proposal.
Statf Response:
Staff believes the proposal is in compliance with the Urban Design Considerations for Vail
Village.
D. Comptiance with the Vail Land Use plan
The following goals of the Vail Land Use Plan are applicable to this proposed alieration:
1.
2.
1'1 Vail should conlinue to grow in a conlrolled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recrealional uses to serve both
the visilor and the permanent resident.
1.3 The quality of development should be mainlained and upgraded whenever
possible.
1.4 The original theme of the old Village core should be carried into new
development in the Village core through continued implementation of the
Urban Design Guide Plan.
1 .12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed
areas (infill areas).
3.4 Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas to
accommodate both local and visitor needs.
Staff Response:
Staff believes that this proposal is consistent with the Vail Land Use plan.
E. Compliance with the Vail Villaqe Master plan Goals
The Vail Village Masler Plan is intended to guide the Town in developing land use laws and
policies for coordinating development by the public and private sectors in Vail Village and in
implementing community goals for public improvements. Further, the Master plan is
intended to serve as a guide to the staff, review boards and Town Council in analyzing future
proposals for development in Vail Village and in legislating effective ordinances to deal with
the such development. Contained within the Vail Village Master Plan are goals for
development in Vail Village. The goals are summarized in six major goal statements. The
goal statements are designed to establish a f ramework, or direction, for the future growlh of
the Village.
A series of objectives outline specific steps toward achieving each stated goal. Policy
statements have been developed to guide the Town's decision-making in achieving each of
the stated objectives, whether it be through the review of private sector development
proposals, or in implementing capital improvement projects.
Goal #1 Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique
architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of
community and identity.
'l .2 Obiective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential
and commercial facilities.
1.3 Obiective:Enhance new development and redevelopment through
public improvements done by private developers working in
cooperation with the Town.
Public improvements shall be developed with the
participation of the private seclor working with lhe
Town.
1.3.1 Policf
Goal #2 To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic
health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole.
2.1 Obiective:Recognize the variety of land uses found in the 10 sub-areas
throughout the Village and allow for development that is
compatible with these established land use patterns.
Recognize the "historic" commercial core as the main activity
center of the Village.
The design criteria in the Vail Village Design Guide
Plan shall be the primary guiding document to
preserve the existing architectural scale and
character of the core area of Vail Village.
2.4 obiective: Encourage the development of a variety of new commercial activity
where comoatible with existino land uses.
2.4.1 Policv;Commercial infill development, consislenl with
established horizontal zoning regulations shall be
encouraged to provide activity generators, accessible
green spaces, public plazas, and streetscape
improvements to the pedestrian nelwork throughout
the Village.
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and
maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to
better serve the needs of our guests.
The Town will use the maximum flexibility possible in
the interpretation of building and fire codes in orderto
facilitate building renovations without compromising
life, health and safety consideralions.
2.5 Obiective:
2.5.2Policv:
Goal #3 To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking
experience throughout the Village.
2.2 Obiective:
2.2.1 Policy:
3.1 Obiective:
3.1.1 Policv:
Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by
landscaping and other improvements.
Private development projects shall incorporale
slreetscape improvemenls (such as paverlreatments,
landscaping, lighting and seating areas), along
adjacent pedestrian ways.
Flowers, trees, waler features and other landscaping
shall be encouraged throughout the Town in locations
3.1 .3 Policy:
adjacenl to, or visible from, public areas.
Goal #6 To insure the continued improvement of the vital operational elements
of the Village.
6.2 Obiective:Provide for the safe and efficient functions of fire, police and
public utilities within the conlext of an aesthetically pleasing
resort setting.
Minor improvements (landscaping, decorative paving,
open dining decks, elc.), may be permitted on Town
of Vail land or right-of-way (with review and approval
by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental
Commission when applicable) provided that Town
operations such as snow removal, street maintenance
and fire department access and operation are able lo
be maintained at current levels. Special design (i.e.
heated pavement), maintenance fees, or other
considerations may be required to offset impacts on
Town services.
6.2.2 Policv:
Staff Response:
Staff believes the proposal helps to obtain the goals and objectives of the Vail Village Master
Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requesl for a minor
exterior alteration pursuanl to Section 12-78-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a commercial store front addition to the Sliler Building, located at
230 Bridge StreeUlot B, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1't Filing. Staff's recommendaiion is based
upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and
teslimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to
approve the minor enerior alteration request, staff would recommend the following findings
be made:
1. That there are no sub-area concepts which relate directly to this
redevelopment proposal, and therefore, lhe redevelopment proposal is in
compliance with the Urban Design Guide Plan for Vail Village.
2. That the redevelopment proposal is in compliance with the Urban Design
Considerations for Vail Village.
3. That lhe redevelopment proposal helps to achieve the goals of the Vail
Land Use Plan, and therefore, the proposal is in compliance with the Vail
Village Master Plan Goals.
4. That the redevelopment proposal is in compliance with the goals
prescribed within the VailVillage Master Plan.
5. That the redevelopment proposal is in compliance with the purpose
slatemenl for the Commercial Core I Zone District.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Reduced Plans dated March 19, 2004
C. Letter from the applicant dated February 9,2004
D. Publication Notice
L2
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING
Monday, March B, 2004
PROJECT ORIENTATION - Community Development Depr. PUBLTC WELCOME 12:00 pm
MEMBERS PRESENT
John Schofield
Erickson Shirley
Chas Bernhardt
Rollie Kjesbo
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Site Visits :
1. Slifer - 230 Bridge Street2. Hughes - 303 Gore Creek Drive, #73. Shirley - 303 Gore Creek Drive, #84. Yare - 2434 Chamonix Lane5. Vail Resorts Development Company - Tract K, Glen Lyon
Driver: George
NOTE; lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm
1. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special
Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, to allow for the redevelopment of the Manor Vail
lodge, and a request for a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of Type lll
Employee Housing Units, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3, Vail Town Code, located ai
'SgS
Valt
Valley Drive/Lots A, B, & C, Vail Village 7th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by Melick and Associates
Planner: WarrenCamobell
MOTION: Lamb SECOND: Bernhardt VOTE: 6-0
Tabfed to April 12,2004
Staff reviewed the memorandum and a letter provided by Jim Lamont, Vail Village Homeowner's
Association, from Fredrick Wyman lll, President of All Seasons Condominium Association. The
applicant.reviewed the goals of the project and displayed multiple visual simulations of the proposal
and how it affected different views.
Jim. Lamont complimented the visual simulations and then expressed concern about the proposed
parking struclure within the required setback from Mill Creek. Mr. Lamont also expressed concern
about the parking lot access and asked why the loading and delivery was not covered. He asked
about employee housing in the parking structure and whether it coltO be moved. He suggested
putting it over the loading and delivery area. Mr. Lamont asked aboul pubic improveme-nis and
whether there were olher pubic improvements that could be required oi should be required. Jim
Lamont indicaled lhal improving access to Ford park could be pursued.
The Commission commented that the setback from Mill Creek was a concern and the prposed
MEMBERS ABSENT
Gary Hartman
o
parking structure should be pulled away. There was also general concern over the access to the
proposed parking structure. The new floor on Building "C" was idenlified as a concern as the height
would block a large portion of the view to the Gore Range. The new floor increased the height by
approximately 22 feel. lt was suggested that Building "C" should taper down to Vail Valley Road.
There needs lo be some planting pockets located on top of the parking structure to provide winter
interest. The existing trees along the bike palh should remain. The relocation of the access gate
further not the properly from its current location will help circulation on Vail Valley Road. There was
some indifference about covered loading and delivery and its value as a public benefit. The
proposed new units should not be required to be placed in a rental pool. The Commission asked the
applicant why they wanted so much floor area and questioned where the public benefits were in the
project which would warrant such a large increase over the maximum GRFA permitted. The
Commission liked the turn-around area provided off of Vail Valley Drive on lhe south lot and the
proposed garden on top of the parking struclure. The Commission stated that they liked the plan
from a year ago when a variance for GRFA to be located within a setback was being requedted.
The applicant was directed to remove all improvements from the 1O0-year floodplain. lmprovements
to Mill Creek could be a significant public improvement. The Commission concluded by iequesting a
complele application with no more work sessions. Staff was directed to review the next submittalior
compleleness very thoroughly. The Commission acknowledged that the photography simulation
used in the presentation worked better than a model. However, the photos need to be realistic
about landscaping and what is impacted with development.
A request for linal review of a variance from Section 1 2-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-1 0:
Landscaping and site Development, and section 12-6H-11: parking and Loading, vail rown
Code, to-allow lor a residential addition, localed at 303 Gore Creek-Drive/Lot 7, Elock 5, Vail
Village 1"'Filing, and setting forth delails in regard thereto.
{Pplicant: Ron Hughes, represented by Shepherd Resources, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson
MorloN: Kjesbo SECoND: Bernhardt vorE:5-0-1 (shirtey absrained)
APPROVED W]TH ONE CONDITION:
1. This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving
Town of Vail design review approval for this proposed residential addition.
Due to the similar nalure of the applications, ilems #2 and#3 (Hughes Residence and Shirley
Residence) were reviewed concurrently.
Staff presented an overview of the request and lhe staff memorandum.
The applicant's architect, shepard Resources, Inc., had no additional commenl. The
appJicant's attorney, Murray Franke Greenhouse List & Lippitt LLP, stated their objeclion to
Slaff's recommended condition #2 for the Hugh's proposai.'
Virginia Wells, adjacent property owner Rowhouse #6, stated thattheydid not supportthe Hugh
Residence variance requesl and did not support the final design of the proposat. tr,ts. Weils
requested that the PEC adopted and broaden the language of Staff's recommended condition
#2 for the Hugh's proposal.
Commissioner Shirley stated his objection to Staff's recommended condition #2 for his
proposal.
The PEC noted the special circumstances and hardships related to the Hughes and Shirley
variance requests. The PEC noted that Slaff's recommended condition #2 was not necessary
as any risk of construction impacting neighboring properties would be addressed by the existing
pnvate party-wall agreemenls.
3. A request for linal review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-9, Site
Coverage, and Section 12-6H-10: Landscaping and Site Development Vail Town Code, to allow for
a"residential addition, located at 303 Gore creek Drive/Lot 8, Block 5, Vail Village
1'' Filing, and setting forth details in regard lhereto.
Applicant: Erickson Shirley, represented by K.H. Webb Architects p.C.
Planner: BillGibson
MorloN: Kjesbo SECoND: Bernhardt vorE:5-0-1 (shirtey absrained)
APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION:
1. This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving
Town of Vail design review approval lor this proposed residential addition.
4. A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-6, setbacks, Vail Town Code, to allow for
encroachments into the setback, located aI2434 Chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block B, Vail das Schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Mark Yare, represented by VAG, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson
MOTION: Cahill SECOND: Bernhardt
DENIED
Staff presented an overview of the request and the staff memorandum.
The applicant's architect, VAg, Inc., summarized the applicant's request and noted their
willingness to decrease the amount deviation from the setback being requested.
Karen Scheideger, adjacent property owner, stated that they did not support the Yare's variance
request.
The Commission commented that the existing aspen sland did constitute a hardship. The pEC
noted that design alternatives complying with the setback requirements exist and the trees can
be removed or relocated.
5. A request lor final review of a variance from Title 14, Development Standards Handbook, Vail Town
Code, to allow for retaining_walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located at Tract K, Glen Lyon
Subdivision and Unplatted Parcels, a more complbte legal desdription is on file at the Community
uevelopment Department, setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development company, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson
MOTION: Kjesbo SECOND: Lamb VOTE: 6-0
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS:
1. This variance request approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving
Town of Vail design review approval of the associated design review apptication-.
2- Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the appticant shall enter into a lease,
license, or easement agreement with the Town of vail for the use of rown
property.
3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the appticant shall prepare aconslruction staging plan for review and approval by the Town of Vail.
4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall survey and then
?
VOTE:6-0
I
install all limits of disturbance fencing and all erosion control methods for review
and approval by the Town of Vail.
5. The applicant shall properly maintain the limits of disturbance fencing and
erosion control melhods throughout the construction of this proposal. Any
modif ication to the location or configuration of the limits of disturbance area shall
require review and approval by the Town of Vail.
Staff presented an overview of the request and the staff memorandum.
The applicant's representative, Jay Peterson, summarized the applicant's proposal and
requested minor changes to Staff's recommended conditions. Staff was agreeable to the
requested changes to the conditions.
The PEC commented on the special circumstances and hardship of this request and noted that if
the proposed walls were constructed in a Town right-of-way, rather than in a Town granted
easement, that this variance request would not be necessary.
6. A request for a recommendalion to the Vail Town Council for a text amendment to Seclion 12-
7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level and Section 12-71-3, Permitted
and Conditional Uses; First Floor and Street Level, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail
Town Code, to allow for temporary real estate sales offices on the first floor or street level of a
building, in lhe Lionshead Mixed Use | & 2 zone districts, and sefiing forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development company, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: George RutherMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
WITHDRAWN
7. A.request for a site coverage variance from Section 12-78-15, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code, to
allow for a commercial store front addition, located at 230 Bridge StreeUlot-B, Block 5-C, Vail Village
1"t Filing, and setting forth details in
regard thereto.
Applicant: Rodney E. Slifer
Planner: WarrenCamobell
MOTION: Lamb SECOND: Kjesbo VOTE; 5-1 (Cahill opposed)
APPROVED WITH ONE CONDITION:
I
1- That the applicant reduces the size of the proposed awning to extend no more
than four feet from the face of the building.
Staff gave a presentation per the memorandum. The applicant and lhe owner of the business
which will be occupying the tenant space, Tom Yoder, gave a presentation explaining the need
to remove the architectural "notch" from the building due to the way it breaks-up the i-nterior retail
space which is the reason previous tenants have not be able to "make-it" in the space. They
continued by dqscribing the notch as a health hazards as people late at night urinate and vomit
in the "notch". Rod Slifer reviewed the application and how the application-would comply with
the goals of the Master Plan and how lhe proposal is not a special privilege.
The commission was in favor of granting lhe variance as the notch does not serve a
positive purpose. They agreed strongly about the negative health issues associated
wilh the unintended consequences of the notch being there (i.e. public urination and
vomjting). Many of the commissioners believed this was a special case which had a
hardship due to the age of the building and it's exislence prior to Town of vail zoning.
4
Commissioner, Doug Cahill asked how this will help the relail space and achieve lhe goals the
applicant stated at the outset. The applicant replied that he is primarily interested in the exterior
modifications and will work out the inlerior remodel issues after getting the variance.
Staff asked for a point of clarification regarding lhe awning and whether the PEC agrees with the
additional site coverage it creates. The Commissioners, except lor Chas Bernhardt, staled that
the awning should not extend any furlher from the face of the building than four feel so as to not
count towards site coverage.
8. A request for a final review of a proposed amendment to the Town of Vail Official Zoning Map to
gftqp.e lhe zoning_of the West Vail Lodge Properties from Commercial Core 3 (CC3) to Higl"r Density
Multiple-Family (HDMF), located at2278,2288,2298 Chamonix Lane and 221r Norih rroritage Road/
Lots 1, 2, 3, and Tract C Vail Das Schone Filing 1 and Inn at West Vail Lot 1, Block A, Vail Dis
Schone Filing 3, in accordance with Section 1i-g-7, Vail Town Code, and seiting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Vanquish Vail, LLC, represented by Allison OchsPlanner: Matt Gennett
MOTION: Bernhardt SECOND: Lamb
TABLED TO MARCH 22, 2004.
The Commission unanimously agreed that this shall be the last tabling to be granted for
this item.
9. A request for a work session to discuss an applicalion for a major amendment to Special
Development District #4, Cascade Village, pursuant lo Seclion 12-9A-10, Vail Town Code to
allow for the adoption of a Development Plan lor the development of a new multiple-family
struclure, located at 1000 W. Frontage Rd./Cascade Village, Development Area A, and setting
forth delails in regard thereto.
Applicant: Ramsey Flower and Greg Walton
Planner: George Ruther
WITHDRAWN
10.-A requesl for a recommendation to fhe Vail Town Council ol a major amendmenl fo Special
Development District No. 36, Four Seasons Resort, pursuant to Seition 12-9A-10, Vail Town
Code, to allow for a mixed-use hotel; a request for a final review of a conditional use permit,
pursuant to Seclion 12-7A-3, Vail Town Code, to allow for Type lll Employee Housing Units and
a fractional fee club; and a request for a recommendalion to the Vail Towh Council oi a
proposed rezonip o! Lots 9A & 9C, Vail Village 2nd Filing from Public Accommodation (pA)
zone districtlo High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) zone district, located at 28 S. Frontige'Rd.
and '13 Vail Road/Lots 9A& 9C, Vail Village 2nd Filing, and setting forth details in regard t6ereto.
Applicant: Nicollet lsland Development Company lnc.Planner: George Ruther
WITHDRAWN
VOTE: 6-0
11. Approval of minutes
MOTION: Kjesbo
12. Information Update
13. Adjournment
MOTION: Bernhardt
SECOND: Lamb VOTE:6-0
SECOND: Lamb VOTE:6-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Departmenl, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for informalion.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published, March 5, 2004 in the Vail Daily.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
OR IGINAL
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Community Development Department
March 8,2004
A request lor final review of a variance from Seclion CC1,12-78-15, Site Coverage, Vail
Town Code, to allow for additional site coverage, located at 230 Bridge StreeVlot B,
Block 5-C, Vail Village 1"' Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Rodney E. SliferPlanner: Warren Campbell
I. SUMMARY
The applicant, Rodney E. Slifer, is requesting a variance from Section 'l 2-78-15, Site Coverage, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a commercial store front addition, located at 230 Bridge StreeUlot B, Block
5-C, Vail Village 1"' Filing. The variance is requested to allow the applicant to enclose an
architectural "notch" in the west fagade of the Slifer Buibing and install an awning which extends out
more than four feet from the face of the building. The proposed enclosure of the architectural notch
and that portion of lhe awning over four feet from the face of the building will count towards the
allowable site coverage on the site. As this site is currently alg7.1"/"site coverage, 807" maximum
allowed by Commercial Core 1 zone district, lhe proposal requires a variance in order to be
construcled. The proposed enclosure would increase site coverage lo 97.5Y". Staff is
recommending denial of the requested variance as a practical difficulty or hardship does not exist
and would conslitute a granting of special privilege to this individual property.
II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
This request is to allow for the enclosure of an architectural "notch" in the west fagade of the Slifer
Building so that it might become interior retail space and the addition of an awning overlhe entrance
which extends out more than four feet form the face of the building. A vicinity map depicting the
location of the Slifer Building in Vail Village is attached for reference (attachment A). The proposed
enclosure measules 2 teet7 inches wide by 4 feet 2 inches deep for a total of 1 0.76 square feet.
The are of the proposed awning over four feet from the face of the building measures 4 inches wide
by 12 feet long for a lotal area of 4 square feet. The combined additional site coverage included in
this proposal is 14.76 square feet. Reduced copies of the proposal are attached for reference which
depicts the area to be enclosed (attachment B). Section 12-78-15 Site Coverage, Vail Town Code,
limits site coverage in the Commercial Core 1 zone dislrict to 80% of the total site area. This
proposal will increase the site coverage from 97.1o/"lo 97.5%, and therefore requires a variance. A
letter from the applicant dated February 9, 2004, has been provided (attachment c).
III. BACKGROUND
. This property is a part of the original Town of Vail which became effective by the election of
August 23, 1966, and the court order of August 26, 1 966.. On February 24, 1992, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a major
exlerior alteration and a site coverage variance request for the Slifer Building. The 1992
proposal added approximately 57 sq. ft. of site coverage to the Slifer Building, in order to
allow for the construction of approximately 53 sq. ft. of additional first floor retail area, and
548 sq. ft. of new office space on the second floor of the building, above the retail space.
The 1 992 site coverage variance approval allowed the applicant to increase the existing site
coverage by 1.8%, trom 92.1T" to 93.9%. The Planning and Environmental Commission
approved the applicant's site coverage variance request, finding that the proposal was in
compliance wilh the Variance Criteria and Findings prescribed in the Municipal Code. The
PEC also found that the strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the site coverage
regulation would result in a practical difficulty, as the site coverage regulation is inconsistent
with the goals and objeclives outlined in the Vail Village Masler Plan and Urban Design
Considerations.. On April 13, 1998 the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a major exterior
alteration and a site coverage variance, to allow for a remodel and expansion to the Slifer
Building. That proposal added approximately 160 sq. ft. of new retail floor area lo the lower
level of the existing building, removed a total of 9 sq. ft. of real eslate office floor area from
the main level (Bridge Street) of the building, and added 1 35 sq. fi. of new office floor area to
theupperlevel of thebuilding. Theproposal increasedthetotal sitecoveragebyl03sq.ft.
for a total of 3,129 sq. ft (97.1%). The "notch" was introduced to the design in order to
reduce the amount of deviation required by the applicant for increased site coverage and to
comply with Design Review Board guidelines.. On March 3, 2004, the Design Review Board (DRB) conducted a conceptual review of the
proposed exterior alteration to the Slifer Building. In lhat meeting the DRB commented on
the awning, the moving of the front door, and the enclosure of the "notch". The Board was
fine with the movement of the door. but there was some concern about a one-foot wide
awning over the new window which is proposed to replace the exisling door. On the Board
there was general agreemenl that the "notch" could be enclosed and still maintain the sense
and feel which was created by the building on the street. However, two members believed
that the proposal as presented was acceptable and the remaining two believed it should be
enclosed by approximalely two feet.
IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES
The PEC is responsible for evaluatino a proposal for:
Action: The PEC is responsible for final approval/denial of a variance.
The PEC is responsible for evaluating a proposal for:
1. The relationship of the requesled variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in
the vicinity.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatmenl among
sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives ol this Title without grant of special privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety.
4. Such other factors and criteria as lhe Commission deems applicable to the proposed
variance.
Desiqn Review Board:
Action: The DRB has NO review authority on a variance, but must review any accompanying
DRB application.
Town Council:
Actions of DRB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town
Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB erred with approvals or denials and can uphold,
uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision.
Staff:
The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans
conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the
applicanl as to compliance with the design guidelines.
Stafl provides a staff memo containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation
of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval,
approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process.
V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
Zoning Regulations
Section 12-2 Delinitions
SITE COVERAGE: The ratio of the total building area on a site to the tolal area of a site, expressed
as a percentage. For the purpose of calculating site coverage, "building area" shall mean the total
horizontal area of any building, carport, porte cochere, arcade, and covered or roofed walkway as
measured from the exlerior face of perimeter walls or supporting columns above grade or al ground
level, whichever is the greater area. For the purposes ol this definition, a balcony or deck projecting
from a higher elevation may extend over a lower balcony, deck or walkway, and in such case the
higher balcony or deck shall not be deemed a roof or covering for the lower balcony, deck or
walkway. In addition to the above, building area shall also include any portion of a roof overhang,
eaves, or covered stair, covered deck, covered porch, covered terrace or covered patio that extends
more than four feel (a') from the exterior face of the perimeter building walls or supporting columns.
Section 12-78 Commercial Core 1 (CC1) District (in part)
12-78-1: PURPOSE:
The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide siles and to maintain the unique character of
the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a
predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to ensure
adequale light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings
and uses. The District regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and
Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the
maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangemenls of buildings fronting on
pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and
architectural qualities that distinguish the Village.
12-78'-1 5: SITE COVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the total site area, unless otherwise specified
in the Vail village urban design guide plan and design considerations. In commercial core 1 district,
ground level patios and decks shall be included in site coverage calculations.
12-78-20: VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESTGN PLAN:
A Adoption: The Vail village urban design guide plan and design considerations are adopted
for the purposes of maintaining and preserving the character and vitality of the Vail village (CC1)
and to guide the future alteration, change and improvement in CC1 district. Copies of the Vail village
design guide plan and design considerations shall be on file in the department of community
development.
Section 12-17 Varaances (in part)
12-17-1: PURPOSE:
A. Reasons For Seeking Variance; In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and
unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this title as would resull from
strictor literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions
of a site or the localion of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on
the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from olher physical limitations, slreet locaiions or conditions in
the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a
regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance.
12-17-5: PLANNING AND ENVTRONMENTAL COMMTSSTON ACTTON:
Within twenty (20) days of the closing of a public hearing on a variance application, the planning and
environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the
application as submitted or may approve the application subject to such modifications oi conditions
as it.deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the
application. A variance may be revocable, may be granled for a limited time period, 6r may be
granted subjecl to such other conditions as the commission may prescribe.
12-17-7: PERMIT APPROVAL AND EFFECT:
Approval of the variance shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and
construclion not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion within two (2) years from
when the approval becomes final.
Vail Village Master Plan
The Vail Village Master Plan is based on the premise that the Village can be planned and designed
as a whole. The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to be consistent with the Vail Villaoe Urban
Design Guide Plan, and along wilh the Guide Plan, it underscores the importance of the relationship
between the built environment and public spaces. Furthermore, the Master Plan provides a clearly
stated set of goals and objectives oullining how the Village will grow in the future.
Goals for Vail Village are summarized in six major goal statements. While there is a certain amount
of overlap between these six goals, each focuses on a particular aspect of the Village and the
community as a whole. A series of objectives outline specific steps that can be taken toward
achieving each stated goal. Policy statements have been developed to guide the Town's decision-
making in achieving each of the stated objectives.
The stated goals of the Vail Village Master Plan which pertain to this application are:
Goal #1 : Encourage high qualily development while preserving the unique architectural scale
of the Village in order lo sustain its sense of community and identity.
1.2 Obiective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and
commercial lacilities.
Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-round economic health and
viabilily for the Village and for the community as a whole.
2.2 Obiective: Recognize the "historic" commercial core as the main activity
center of the Village.
2.2.1 Policy: The design criteria of the Vail Village Urban Design Guide
plan shall be the primary guiding document to preserve the
existing architectural scale and character of the core area of
VailVillage.
2.5 Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance ol
exisling lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs
of our guests.
Goal #3: To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience lhroughout
the Village.
3.1 Obiective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and
other improvements.
3.1.1 Policy: Privale development projects shall incorporate streetscape
improvements (such as paver treatments, landscaping,
lighting and seating areas), along adjacent pedestrian ways.
VailVillage Urban Design Plan
This Guide Plan represents collective ideas about functional and aesthetic objectives for Vail
Village. Diagrammatic in nalure, the Guide Plan is intended to suggest lhe nature of improvements
desired. lt is based on a number of urban design criteria determined to be appropriate for guiding
change in the Vail Village. The Guide plan is intended to be a guide for current planning in both the
public and private sectors.
VI. ZONING ANALYSIS
Zoning: Commercial Core 1 District
Land Use Plan Designation: Village Master Plan
Current Land Use: Mixed Use
Development Standard Allowed/Required Existinq
Lol Area: 5,000 sq. ft. 3,223 sq. ft.
Prooosed
no change
Setbacks:
Front:
Sides:
Rear:
Building Height:
Site Coverage:
Landscape Area:
Parking:
VII. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
Per Vail Village 1 ft. no change
Urban Design 0 ft./0 ft. no changeGuidelines 0 ft. no change
60%at33ft. or less 100%at33ft. or less nochange
40/" at 33 ft. to 43 ft. 0% at 33 ft. to 43 ft. no change
2,578 sq. fr. (80%) 3,129 sq. tr. (97.1%) 3,143.8 sq. tr. (97.5old
Per the Vail Village 51.5 sq. ft. no change
Urban Design Guide
Plan
per Section 12-10-10 per Section 12-10-10 .04 space (2.3
spaces/1,000
square feel)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Land Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
Open Space
Mixed Use
Zonino
Commercial Core 1 District
Commercial Core 1 District
Outdoor Recrealion District
Commercial Core 1 District
VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. Consideration of Factors Regardinq the Setback Variances:
1 . The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential
uses and slructures in the vicinity.
Staff believes that the proposed site coverage variance is neither compatible
with nor comparable to the surrounding development along Bridge Street.
Many of the existing properties in the vicinity of the applicant's property have
site coverages in the range of 83% to 85%. With this proposal the enclosure
of the "notch" and the addition of the awning would take the existing site
coverage ol 97.1"/o to 97.5% site coverage. Those sites with higher site
coverages are the result of either Special Development Districts or special
circumstances and physical hardships. Below is a lisl of some sites in the
vicinity with their current site coverages listed and how they obtained that site
coverage.
A. A&DBuildino
October 8, 1 984 - The PEC approved a CCI exterior alteration. No variances
were requesled. Site coverage was proposed at 79.0%. The exterior
alteration was approved with the condition that a floodplain modification
request be approved by the Town prior to construction.
May 8, 1985 - The PEC approved a floodplain modification for the A & D
development. No stream setback variance was required.
February, 1995 - Applicant proposes expansion to Golden Bear. Proposed
site coverage is 79.95%.
B. Red Lion Buildinq
April 9, 1990 - The PEC approved a view corridor encroachment, stream
setback variance, site coverage variance, CCI exlerior alteration, and
conditional use permit (to allow an outdoor dining deck). Prior to
redevelopment, the Red Lion Building encroached into the Mill Creek stream
setback 1 to 18 feet. The proposed redevelopment requested 5 additional
feet of encroachment. The staff memo cited the location of the exisling
building and the A & D improvements as signilicant issues that would not
make the request a grant of special privilege. The staff recommended denial
of the requests, allhough the PEC ultimately approved the requests.
Concerning site coverage for the Red Lion redevelopment, the proposal
included 50 square feet of additional sile coverage. However, as part of the
redevelopment, 27 square feet of existing site coverage was to be
eliminated. As a result, there was net increase of 23 square feet of site
coverage. At the time of the proposal, the existing Red Lion Building had a
site coverage of 83%. Though the staff recommendation for the site
coverage variance request was denial, the PEC ultimately approved it.
One of the conditions of the exterior alteration was an agreement between
the Town and the Red Lion developers that the GRFA approved through that
process be lhe cap. Language has been incorporated into the condominium
declarations that the existing 8,714 square feet of GRFA and three dwelling
units are the maximum allowed for the property and that no other GRFA or
dwelling units may be added to the project in the future. The standards for
CCI zoning would have allowed approximately 11,200 square feet of GRFA
and eight dwelling units.
On October 22, 1990, the PEC approved an exterior alteration and a sile
coverage variance to allow an airlock to be conslructed for the Szechuan
Lion Restaurant. At the time of the request the building had a site coverage
of 83.2 percent. The proposed airlock was an additional 60 square feet. The
approval allowed the building to reach a site coverage of 83.6 percent. Staff
recommended approval, primarily because the Zoning Code at the time
emphasized the need for airlocks.
C. Bridoe Street Lodge (Golden Peak House)
November 2, 1993 - Town Council approved a Special Development District
for the Golden Peak House. This included, among other things, a site
coverage request which exceeded the 80% allowed in CCl. At the time ot
the proposal, lhe existing Golden Peak House on the existing lot had a site
coverage of 91 .6%. Under the approved plans with the expanded lot, the
site coverage will be 94%.
D. Curtin HillBuildino
March 8, 1 993 - The PEC approved a CCI exterior alteration for this building.
Site coverage at the time of this proposal was 71"/". Ihe approved site
coverage is71.6%.
E. Vista Bahn Building
On March 13, 1995, a request for a major exterior alteration in the
Commercial Core 'l zone district and site coverage, stream setback, and
common area variances and conditional use permits to allow office space on
the third floor and to allow an ouldoor dining deck, to provide for the
redevelopment of Serrano's was approved by the Planning and
Environmenlal Commission. This approval granted a site coverage variance
of 83.9% as several buildings in the vicinity had site coverages in the range
of 83%.
On August 24, '1998, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved
a variance and minor exterior alteration to allow for a new entry to the
building which increased the site coverage by 53.5 square feet to a total ol
85.0%. The reason for the minimal increase in site coverage is that most of
the addition occurred within the Town of Vail rightof-way which does not
count against the site coverage calculation for the site.
On April 28, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Commission denied a
variance request to increase site coverage from 85.0% to 87.2'/o.
F. Clock Tower Building
August 12, 1 991 - The PEC denied a request for a site coverage variance at
the Superstars Studio within the Clock Tower Building. The PEC found that
the prope(y was nol encumbered wilh a physical hardship. The existing site
coverage was 87%. The request for an additional 28 square feet would have
pul sile coverage a\ 87.2/". The staff recommended denial and the PEC
concurred.
G. Covered Bridqe Buildino
The Covered Bridge building was approved for redevelopment in '1993. The
applicants originally requested five variances and a floodplain modification,
but ultimately designed a building which conformed with allzoning standards
was approved.
The degree to which relief lrom the strict and literal interpretation and
enlorcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve
compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives ol this title without a grant of special privilege.
Staff believes that this variance request should nol be approved as it would
be a grant of special privilege. This property received approval on February
24, 1992, for a major exterior alteration and a sile coverage variance requesl
which increased the existing site coverag e by 1 .8o/", lrom 92.1'/" to 93.9%.
On April 13, 1998 the Planning and Environmenlal Commission approved
Major CC'l Exterior Alteration and a site coverage variance, to allow for a
remodel and expansion to the Slifer Building. Thal proposal added
approximately 160 sq. ft. of new retail floor area to the lower level of the
existing building, removed a total of 9 sq. ft. of real estate office floor area
from the main level (Bridge Street)of the building, and added 135 sq. ft. of
new office floor area to the upper level of the building. The proposal
increased the total site coverage by 103 sq. ft. for a total of 3,129 sq. ft
(97.1%). In the proposal approved in 1998 the applicant initially requested
more site coverage than was finally approved as it was the concern ol the
Planning and Environmental Commission that while a site coverage variance
was warranled it was not warranled to the eltent the applicant was proposing
and as a result the site coverage which was approved was a reduction in the
initial submittal's requesl. This reduction can be seen by comparing the
contents of the March 23, 1998, work session memorandum which detailed a
300 square foot addition and the April 'l3, 'l998, final review memorandum
which was an approval ol a 286 square foot addition.
Staff feels that the variances granted previously allowed the Slifer Building to
enjoy the same privilege given to other properties in the area. As listed in
Criteria 1 above buildings in the vicinity meet the requirement, exceed to the
tune of approximately 83% to 85/o, or exceed due to the approval of a
Special Development District. The size, configuration, existing slructure, and
location of this site in the Village are similar to all the properties. Stalf
believes there are no physical hardships on this lot which warrants further
increase to the site coverage allowances. Staff believes that this current
request for a sile coverage variance is only a slep in a series of incremental
increase which have occurred on this property. Approval of this variance
would be granting a special privilege upon this site that no other property in
the vicinity can enjoy.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of
population, transporlation and traffic facilities, public facilities and
utilities, and public safety.
The requested variance will have little, or no impact, on the above described
criteria.
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to
the proposed variance.
The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino
findinqs before qrantinq a variance:
'l . That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following
reasons:
a. The strict literal interprelalion or enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistenl with the objectives ol this title.
b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same districl.
IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends denial of the request for a variance from
Section 12-7P'-15, Sile Coverage, to allow tor 97.5Y" site coverage. Staff's recommendation is
based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and
testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to deny this
variance, the Community Development Departmenl recommends that the following findings be
made:
a) That the granting of the variance will constitute a granting of special privilege inconsistenl
with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
10
b) That the granting of the variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or wellare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
c) The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation does not result in
praclical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this
title.
d) The strict interpreiation or enforcement of the specified regulation does nol deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
X. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Reduced Plans dated March 2, 2004
C. Letter form lhe applicant dated February 9, 2004
D. Publication Notice
1_1
.'1
I
I
,f --)
I
PROPOSED STOREFRONT
SHOI^IN DA-.HED
f-T, l.t41,,'l',,,|
,/.I|,/ |a(--ru-,Lu
ll
gcALE 3/O',-\',-O.
%AlE 3/b"=l'-O
<EVOSABE
Attachment: B
oI
\\
.i
IV)
\\\:rii"\{t
\
z
JGcoo
4
@
fi
|d
i3 - iriEeE= =l
i:tsssi:sisss3=tl
o -I-(,I
P.g]l
"iF i i_l*i= e ; 61';
FE€ € gE
x=E ! El+
l:+ s gll
=r i $= ;li9BE rj zle'*X- d'= |rrr io 4.: __l_
{,
o crt
rdi
i!OLT3
tl:
logTh5't i€;tEf 9 E
s;ce;;
:toa-
''lf,o
tozo
o
o
=
'6
UJ
n#off9o_ [! (/]oxtd \J ILIo-Fd
.=r5..: =
z-t E.P
;it ? crll c odl 6=Et €;v)t -o cal=- 6 I
nl- PE
r) l:- 'i -vli. '.9-l- <a
zlY i.e56 0;
o
'
0,
>\
LU
F.
t-
tl
Lii
(J
Fza\
e.lr.Ltl
Fu')
zF<n
X
LLI
Z
o-
o
=
o-
'.E
t'th
"0-,t
zI
lrl
lu
n*Ru6
Y h.4ox>
L-olr/)
IIJ
4
@
v.
;F - i:i:s€= =l ]
isrss Si:iis;s H= $
r-l -E0zl =EYl vjiil o, O
dl ;o1\l ) -vt F iu)l : t
9t =;,Ll -o c
-l c O
=l;-
o,::t 1xl- P5
,l 6!zl! '8;
al-- ? t
=l " -ro. *l: -'3
=tu !J q
uJt u1 z-+
o-
>
'lC
lrr
zo
F
ltlJul
^au) /'\ 7
RVOXfr")ox;d. t) uJo-F&
F{
4.
@
EE{vts*sliiiis,dd
o
o
o
-E
.+
eo
c' ; 5 -^-+ !U !,r XE
r o ! iYt--o rco _9 .=;or os - 16* Fa€ ttE dutr ij-
=A'-;
>-n
rDO
;o
6=.::
- 8',6
i xx\ _.:- ?5-.. _!
< F.iu v9
.z
o
tl-l
F
o
LlJ(nr)
o_o
o-
.-z_o
uJ
uJ
zo
F
ttl
nt
?{AY6YhaoN=
d (-J l,!lo-Fozv)
lrJ
4
@
.-IIJVss*sei$€is,dd
o,
q
-.o(,
_!
E
tu
.E
-6,g,si ^ E
==-c7^'i cr : :
= '=- t ,Ex 6 -11o) -!= - - - !!.=:=u-- I d u; ! 9_; a v c; #EE 3 F E
.=
-F6-Y.:.t ;'iU9;o.q_o-
;o
tg
=tco;. 9u
- E',6r ;-g{ -{F- <o-
= ur ru<h€
Fz
Q, e.c Lr-
IJJFu.
o;tu)rco
Xa:o!J0-
r-gct o-
Jz
CF;-
*LU
UJ
u";
U
F.zoE
Lt-tl-ld.
U)
A
LLI
z
a
..1
LLI
LIJ
LLIa
I'-t-
I
t_-
b3
[!
Fi
zI
uulto
J
3
n#
Y<&oYhaox>guLLl*b-
d,
@
v.
O
bc.'6) _Pro xtS +3 P \-:T?.3-jEar-l =35 9_.o od Li6 0-"8 >:X".l € eo€P tE
,4.- 6 .: o.il' Y O ll' hfas *5
x f s xjEI- E=* 3_S p;
.8,
c!. {r
:.b
:o-
=s
rOiq
'i2
':si 8-
--ooo
F_?jlE-6io
xod.9
'qEi;:
I
I
t;
l=
6lE 6!fu$*3E$$$$,d,d
o.E
(t
.E
o
o_
I
-6
ra
66dr3*90
bEt
d;:
Y'E O
6qd,zf4
-o
E
o
j
"d
)
_!
;
UJ
tttl
CDt Ol_!l _!l
loi .oi*l Elo; 9i
FlSiP o:>15 Lcl
.d,i g g,l
,it5 ,il
,!1.= r!l
'=;
-!
=!,
-.o-o
_9
o
.F
t
o_
-9
.;]
E
o
!
't
.s-s5
.y='iU
oq
;o
r!
.=;3Ccoi. 9e:- 35
t, 6 b
- ?d-,l; ,,3
= uJ il,< X'E
a z--!.
|--Zo
u-tueoF
u')o
LLI
o_
o_
z
a
?
LIJil
iro
F_t ;x.9 c;'> ^:i;
a b'F;:'ro
,.5 Fe
L_
l-o
;
I
I
I
I
I
r--
I ui
;
.,
.cd
6od
*9
-tl
E
]'FrDO
z-a
'-E](,z
A Jorur vrr ruru wnu
February 9,2004
Town of Vail
Planning & Environment Commission
25 So. Frontage Road W.
Vail. CO 81657
Dcar Commission Members:
I am requesting a variance to increase the site coverage of the retail space which is part of
the Slit'er Building. The amount requested is minimal.
'I'his space has been occupied by at least four tenants in recent years and none have
succeeded financially. The current tenant has hired a retail consultant, Commercial Arts,
tiom Boulder. One conclusion they have come to is that the entrance iind front of the
building needs to be modified to make it more visible, appeaiing and functional. The
enclosed drawings depict what I view to be a huge improvement.
The portion I wish to enclose is the indentation shown on the drawings. This area is of
no functional or aesthetic value to the I'agade of the building. From a retail standpoint. as
pointed out by the consultants. this indentation is a barrier on the right as you enref rhe
existing door by merely directing you to the stairs to rhe lower level.
In retail, there is a "right hand rule". When you enter a retail store, the vast majoritics of
people turn or look to the right. The existing wall is a definite barrier tcr good retail
space. This street-level space would be greatly enhanced by incorporating the design rve
are sublnitting.
In addition, this space is entirely covered by roof. it isn't as though it is a beautifully
sunlit space. I 1-eel the inability to remodel as proposed would bc a hardship ancl woulcl
Iead to another retail business having a diffrcult time succeeding.
Vail Village Offrc
230 Bridgc Street . Vail Colorado 81657 . Telephone 970 47G 242j . Facsimile 970 476 2655
@
z'lnROr\tEADAttachment: C &vall.
Page2
The impact will not affect light and air, distribution of population, transportation, traffic
facilities, utilities, or public safety. It will actually eliminate an ugly and actual litter-
filled portion of Bridge Street. I also feel it is compliant with the current streetscape
improvement effons being implemented by the Town of Vail.
Thank you for your consideration.
Best regards,
Slifer Buildinf, LLC
o
THIS ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on March 8, 2004, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-10:
Landscaping and Site Development, and Section 12-6H-1 1 : Parking and Loading Vail Town
Code, lo allow for a residential addition, located at 303 Gore Creekbrive/Lot 7, Elock 5, Vail
Village l"tFiling, and setting forth detail's in regard thereto.
Applicant: Ron Hughes, represenled by Shepherd Resources, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for final review of a variance from Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code, to allow tor
A residential addition, located at2434 chamonix Lane/Lot 11, Block B, vail das schone
Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Mark Yare, represented by VAg, Inc.Planner: Bill Gibson
A request for final review of a variance from Seclion 12-6H-6, Setbacks, Section 12-6H-9, site
coverage, and Section 12-6H-10: Landscaping and Site Development Vail Town Code, to allow for
A residential addition, located at 303 Gore creek Drive/Lot 8, Bbck s, Vail Village
1"' Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicanl: Erickson Shirley, represented by K.H. Webb Architects p.C.Planner: Bill Gibson
A.request for final review of a variance from Chapter '14-6, Grading Slandards, Vail Town Code, to
allow for.retainpg walls in excess of six (6) feet in height, located it Tract K, Glen Lyon Subdivision
and Unplatted_Parcels, a more complete metes and bbunds description is available at the Community
Development Departement and setting forth details in regard thereio.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development, represented by Braun and AssociatesPlanner: Bill Gibson
A request for a recommendation to lhe Vail Town Council for a text amendment to Section '12-
7H-3, Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor or Street Level and Section 12-71-9,
Permitted and Conditional Uses; First Floor and Street Level, pursuant to Section 12-3-7,
Amendment, Vail Town Code, to allow for temporary real estale sales offices on the first floor or
slreel level of a building, in the Lionshead | & 2, Mixed Use zone district, and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Development company, represenled by Braun and AssociatesPlanner: George Ruther
A request for final review of a variance from Section CC1,12-78-15, Site Coverage, Vail Town Code
to allow for additional sile coverage, located at 230 Bridge StreeVlot B, Block S--C, Vait Village 1"t
Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Rodney E. SliferPlanner: Warren Camobell Attachment: D
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
rygular office hours in the project planner's olfice, located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend project orientation
and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the Town of Vail Community Develbpment
Department. Please call 479-2138 lor information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
This notice published in the Vail Daily on February 20,2004.
TOI44VM
E Rezoning $1300 ftr Major Subdivision $1500 Dtr Minor Subdivision 9550 trtr Exemption Plat $650 trE Minor Amendment to an SDD $1000 trtr New Special Development District 96000 trEl Major Amendment to an SDD 96000 trE MajorAmendmentto an SDD $1250 d
fto erten:or modifications) tr
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557
tel: 970.479.2139 faxi 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General Information:
All. projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a
building permit ?pplication. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particulai approval that is requestid.
An appliotiori f6i Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information
is.received by the Community Development Departrnent. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town
Council andlor the Design Review Board.
Type of Application and Fee:
,?ECE,UEO
.r.cb 0 g l
Application for Review by the - - *"*'r
Planning and Environmental Commission
$6s0
$400
$6s0
$800
$1500
$zs0
$1300
$500
$200
Description of the Request Renodel front of a p
LocationoftheProposal: Lot: B Block:5-C Subdivision: Vail Villaee lst Filine
Physical Address: 230 Bridge Street Vai1, CO 81657
Parcef No.: 2LOL08229002 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcet no.)
Zoning:cc2
Condiuonal Use Permit
Floodplain Modification
Minor Exterior Alteration
Major Exterior Alteration
Development Plan
Amendment to a Development Plan
Zoning Code Amendment
Variance
Sion Variance
Name(s) of Owner(s):Slifer Buikline. LLC
MailingAddress: 230 Brldge Street Vai1. C0 81657phone: 476-242L
Owner(s) Signature(s):
NameofApplls3nl; Rodney E. Sllfer, Member
Mailing Address: 230 Brldse Srreet Vai1. CO g1657
Phone: 476-242I
E-mail Address: rs l ifer@s l ifer. ne t Fax 476-2658
Page I of6-01/18/02
...-I
Land Title Guarantee Company
CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION
CU RANI[t COIIPANY
Date: 02-11-2004
Property Address:
Our Order Number: V50004244
230 BRIDGE STREET AKA LOT B, BLOCK 5C, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING VAIL, CO 81657
SLIFER SM]TH & FRAMPTON-BRIDCE STREET
230 BRIDGE ST.
VAIL, CO 81657
Attn: ROD SLIFER
Phone:970476-2421
Fax: 970-476-265&
EMail: rslifer@slifer. nel
Sent Via Courier*.1*
If you have any tnquiries or require further cssistance, please contact one of tlte numbers below:
For Title Assistance:
Vail Title Dept.
Roger Avila
IO8 S. FRONTAGE RD. W. NO3
P.O. BOX 357
vArL, co 81657
Phone:970-476-225I
Fax: 910-O64732
EMail: ravila@ltgc.com
I ll
Land Title Guarantee Company
Date:02-l l-2004
v50004244Land Title
OUARANTTT COIVIPANY Our Order Number:
Property Address:
230 BRIDGE STREET AKA LOT B, BLOCK 5C, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING VAIL, CO 81657
Buyer/Borrower:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Seller/Owner:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Neeq.a r.t3p or directions fo1 yoql upcoming closing? Check out Land Title's web site at www.ltgc.comtor directions to any of our 54 office locations.
ESTIMATE OF TITLE FEES
Information Binder $77s.00
TOTAL 9775 .00
PoE coNfAcr (3/2oo3)TIIANK YOU I-OR YOI,'R ORDER!
to
Chicago Title Insurance Company
ALTA COMM]TMENT
Our Order No. V50004244
Schedule A Cust. Ref.:
Property Address:
230 BRIDGE STREET AKA LOT B, BLOCK 5C. VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING VAIL. CO 81657
1. Effective Date: January 30, 2004 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policy to be ksued, and Proposed Insured:
Infomration Binder
Proposed Insured:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
3. The estate or interest in the land dccribed or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effetive date hereof vested in:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5, The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
oa
Our Order No. V50004244
TEGAL DESCRIPTIOIU
LOT B, BLOCK 5, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PL,AT
THEREOF AND A PORTION OF LOT C, BLOCK 5, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDING
TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SA]D LOT C WHICH IS A POINT OF TANGENT ON
THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRIDGE STREET; THENCE SOUTH 82 DEGREES 23 MINUTES OO
SECONDS EAST 55.06 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C; THENCE SOUTH 4
DEGR-EES 22 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 1.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES 38
MINUTES OO SECONDS WEST 56.58 FEET TO A POINT ON A 92.30 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
WHICH iS THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRIDGE STREET; THENCE 4.50 FEET ALONC THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTRAL ANCLE IS 2 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 34 SECONDS
AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS NORTH 25 DEGREES T7 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST 4,50
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF EAGLE. STATE OF COLORADO.
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ANY LAWFUL PURPOSE AS SET FORTH IN THE CROSS
EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED MAY 8, 1992 RECORDED IN BOOK 590 AT PAGE 760, COUNTY
OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
oo
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Sectiorl
(Requirements) Our Order No. V50004244
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Itenr (a) Payruerrt to or for the account of the grantors or morrgagors of the full consideration for the estate or
i[terest to be irxured.
Itetn (b) Ptoper instrurnent(s) creating the estate or interest to be insurecl must be executed ancl duly filed for record,
to-wit:
Item (c) Payurertt of all taxes, charges or assessments levied and assessed against the subject premises which are clue
and payable.
Item (d) Additional requiremenrs, ifany disclosed below:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR ]NFORMATION ONLY. AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO,
ao
ALTA COIVIMITMENT
Schedule B - Section 2
(Exceptions) Our Order No. V50004244
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
I . Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easeme s, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, corrllicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, errcroaclunents, ancl any facts which a correct suwey and
inspection of the prernises would disclose and which are not shown by the pubtic records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law anci
not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encuntbrances, adverse claims or other matters, ifany, createcl, first appearing in the public records or
ataching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of recorcl for
value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Comnitment.
6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing lieru by the public recorcls.o the Treasurer's office.
7. Liem for uupaid water and sewer charges, ifany..
8. In additiou, the owner's policy witl be subject to the lortgage, if any, noted in Section I of Schedule B hereof.
9. RICHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 12. 1899. IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
IO. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 12. 1899.
IN BOOK 48 AT PACE 475.
I1. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,
SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTION 3607 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HANDICAP PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED
AUGUST IO, 1962.IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE I79.
12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CROSS-EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED
OCTOBER 05, I992IN BOOK 590 AT PAGE 760.
Io
ALTA COMMiTMENT
Schedule B - Sectiou 2
(Exceptions) our order No. v50004244
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 05. 1992 IN
BOOK 590 AT PAGE 76I.
14. RIGHTS OF TENANTS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A, AS TENANTS ONLY, UNDER UNRECORDED
LEASES.
15. INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON ALTAiACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
PREPARED BY EACLE VALLEY SURVEYING, INC. DATED JULY 20, 2OOO, JOB NO.
459-3. (BEING THE SAME ITEM REFRENCED IN THE RECORDED DOCUMENT LISTED AS
ITEM 12 OF SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 OF THIS COMMITMENT.)
16. THE EFFECT ON SUBJECT PROPERTY OF BUILDING OVERHANG AS SHOWN ON ALTA/ACSM
LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY EACLE VALLEY SURVEYING. INC. DATED JULY 20.
2000, JoB No. 459-3.
17. DEED OF TRUST DATED AUCUST 25, 2OOO, FROM SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2,1OO,OOO.OO
RECORDED AUGUST 30,2OOO, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 737902.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO AMERICAN MEMORIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
IN ASSIGNMENT RECORDED DECEMBER I8, 2003, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 862480.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
AUGUST 30, 2OOO. UNDER RECEPTION NO. 737903.
18. FINANCING STATEMENT WITH FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, THE SECURED
PARTY, RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2OOO, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 737904.
AMENDMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID FINANCING STATEMENTWAS RECORDED MARCH
14, 2002, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 789080.
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COIVIPANY
DISCLOSLTRE STATEMENTS
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-i1-122, notice is hereby given that:
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.
B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction rnay be obtained from the County
Treasurer's authorized agent.
C) The infonlation regardiug special districts and the boundaries of such clistricts may be obtained lrom
the Board of Coulty Commissioners, the County Clerk ancl Recorder, or the Couuty Assessor.
Note: Et'fective September l, 1997 , CRS 30- 10-406 requires that all ilocuments received for recording or filingil the clerk antl recordet's office shall contain a krp margin of at least one inch and a left, right ancl bonom
ntargin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder nuy refuse to record or file any clocrunent that
does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to clocuruents using frtrms
on which space is providetl for recording or filing infornutiou at the top maryin of the docunent.
Note: Colorado Division of hsurance Regulatioru 3-5-l , Paragraph C of Articte VII requires that "Every
title eltity shall be responsible for all rnatters which appear of record prior to the time of recording
whenever the title entity conducts the closing aud is responsible for recorcling or filing of legal
dtxuurents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Providecl that Land Title Guarantee
Conpany conducts the closing of the iruured tralsaction ancl is responsible for recording the
legal documents from the transaction, exceptiol] mmber 5 will not appear on fhe Owner's Title
Policy and the Lenders Policy whel issued.
Note: Affimrative tnechadc's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletiol
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Cornmitment from the Owrrer's Policy to be
issued) upon compliarce with the following conditions:
A) The land described in Schedule A of this comm.iturent rnust be a single famiiy residence which
includes a condominium or tovnhouse unit.
B) No labor or Inaterials have been furnished by rueclnnics or material-uten for purposes of
construction on the land described in Scheclule A of this Commitment within the past 6 morths.
C) The Company must receive an appropriate atfidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed
urechanic's and material-men's liens.
D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriare premium.
E) If there has been constnrction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within sir months prior to the Date of the Commiunent, the requirements to obtail coveragc
for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certail co$tructiou irrfonnation: financial infonnation
as to the seller, dre builder and or the contractor: payment of the appropriate prernium fully
executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the conpany, and, any additional requirements
as may be uecessary after an exarnination of the afbresaid information by the Cornpany.
No coverage will be given under any circumstarces for labor or material for which the insurecl
has contracted for or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS l0-11-123, notice is hereby given:
This notice applies to owuel's policy comrnimrents containing a lfrreral severance instnulent
exception, or exceptious, in Schedule B, Section 2.
A) That there is recoriled evidence that a mineral estate has been severecl, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the surface estate and that tirere is a substantial liketihood that a thircl party
holds soure or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothernul energy in the property; and
B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the propety without the
surface owner' s pennissiou.
Nothing herein contained will be deerned to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages
referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied.
Fofm D I SCLOSURE 09/01/Oz
oo
i a
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company and
Land Title Guarantee Company
July l,2001
We recognize. and r-e-spect.the privacy expecrations of rotlay's consumers antl the recluirenreuts of applieablc federal and
sm^te prlvacy- laws._ we bcllev€ that mabn_c you aware of how wc usc your ngrr-public personal information ('PersorulIntormatloll ). arld to whont-tt is disclosed, will fonn the basis for a rblarionshif of rnist bcrween us and the public
llHt wc servc. I hls Pnvacy Statement provitles thar_ explanarion. We reserve thd righr ro change this Privacy'
Sareureut frour tinrc to tinie consistenfwith applicable'privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
* Frorn applications or odrer f()rnls we receive frorn you or vour autllorizcd reoresernarive:" l'rolll your transacrions wirh. or fronr the senices 6eing perfonrred by, us, our affiliates. or odtcrs;+ l-,rolD rlur intenlet weh sites:* Frt1ry the public record^: rnaintairted. by goverrurrerrtal cntiries rhar wc eirher obrain dirc,ctly froru drose
enlltles, or lrom our atttltates or others: and* From consumer or odrer reponing agencies.
Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentlality and Security of Your Personal Information
We ntaintairt physical, elcctronic and procegural safeguards to prorect your Personal Informarion front unaurhorizecl
access or lnrruslon. we llnut aucess to tnc personal lnJonrmtion or y !o tltose enrployees who ncetl such access inconnection with providing products or services to you or frrr other t6gitimate busineds purposes.
Our Policies and Practicc Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
{-e- 1!iy 9!are y<rur Personal lnformatiou with our affiliates. such as insurance cornpanies, agenrs. and other real
esmte settlement service providers. we also rnay disclose your personal Infonutiori:
* to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services vou have requesre4;+ ttt third-pany contractois or scrvice providcrs wto provide servic,is or perfonri nrarkedng or otherfunctioni od our behalf: and* to others with whom we enter into joint markering agreements for products or services that we believe you
may tind of interest.
lrt addition we will disclose your Persotnl Irtformation when you direcr or give us permission. wheu we are requiredby^law to do so, or when we suspcct fraudulent or cri.rnirul aciivities. We alit-r mav'rlisclose vour Personallntonnatlon when otherwisc pemritted by applicable privacy laws such as, for exaiuple. wheir disclosure is neede4to enforce our rights arising out of any dgre'einenr, trlnsaliioniri..iitio;ilhit;irh ttu.
,O::^ql ft". t^*qp^rlant responsibilities of sone of our affi.liaterl.companies is to recorcl docurnents in the public
domarn. Such docunents may contain your Personal Information. -
Right to Access Your Pemonal Information and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion
Cenain states aJtord yr2q the righ.r to access your Persorul Inftrrmation and, under certain circunrsrances, to find ourto wllolu your Personal Intorulation lns beeu disclosed, Also, certain states afford vou tlre risht to rer:uesr
991ect1on, q1e1,!3te"ttt or deletion of your PersorF! Infrrrmation. We reserve the rilht. wherE permitt6d by law, toclrarge a reasonable tee fo cover the cosrs irrcurred irr responding to such requesrs. -
$],fS."i:" sgl]nritred,to the Fidplity. Na-tional.Financ.ial Group of Conrpanies/Chicago Title Insurarrce Corrrpanysnatt be ln wntlng, and delivered to the followius address:
Privacv Compliance Officer
Fidelity Natioual Financial, Inc.
3::gg11f*.:bfr51?3'
Multiple Products or Services
ll^t.f^.y,',{.^lqt1_y1h pore than olte firnncial protlucr or service, yuu uray reccive rnore rhan one privacy noticerrom us. we apotogtzc tor any toconveluence dlis nray cause you.
Form PRIV.PoL.Ctll
\'
z
J
EooJ
E
\
-6z
w,
LII r_\IJI, \J()[o- uJals
t4
4,
@
a-,
KJv.
r ,li-'ll2 lztoll- lz3lBl> l<ls Eldld Ololfus,$gssg$*,dd
:v6=
x]
oUF\O
N\:
g
+
Rs -ad
| 9:I a, -E
I co
I co11 0 e
lY o >\
l- Y';
l\ -:.:l- -1
^| 1-| .. -!
I= LU Ot< x*-t() \.,, o
I i't Z+
zou.
LI.J
Fan
otl-trn
(J
z
o_
et
=-
(J
za\
ut
LJF
a\z
at)
><Ltt
z
o_
o
t
'
rlJ
-r-
I
Fl o
ato
ol 0J
dF!+t g
:lL
r tln
tl| --r-
-
_.9 -P*9rai
iqOL:6
t6
c>-
EYoP
eogThd't i-t
.:, > o;9E
d"0 o
v: d
p;;
'o .9t;
z_9
0)
.E'6-dcFoo-t*E-
F't
-o:-
- P-
=; di ".i..Y Fo)> d
;:JL
\i
)
.g]o
t
.i
'z
t't^
g
o
o
-E;
I
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-21 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
Rod Slifer
230 Bridge Street
Vail, CO 81657
February 27,2004
Re: Slifer Building applicalions for exterior alterations and, a variance for site coverage located at 230
Bridge StreeV Lol B, Lot 5C, Vail Village lstFiling
Mr. Slifer,
This letter is lo inform you thal your variance application has been reviewed by staff and after
conducting research of the Town of Vail legal files lhat staff will be unable to recommend approval of
your variance request.. As you are aware, your property received several site coverage variances over
the years. The most recent site coverage variance was granted on April 13, 1998, which permitted the
property to have 97.1% site coverage. Your current proposal to create 18.768 square feet of additional
site coverage would increase the existing site coverage to g7.lT".
While a 0.6% increase in site coverage seems minimal staff believes lhere are several reasons for
which we cannot support your requesl to further increase the site coverage on the property. During the
course of review of your 1998 site coverage request both the Planning aid Environmentai Commission
and the Design Review Board required that the face of the building be "broken-up" which resulted in the
design with the notch you propose to enclose. In addition, stafl has performed research on the site
coverage of other properties in the Commercial Core 1(CC1) Zone District and found lhe following
information on other properties within the same zone districl:
A. A & D Building site coverage is 79.95%.
B. Red Lion Building site coverage is 83.6%.
C. Bridge Street Lodoe (Golden Peak House) site coverage is 94%.
D. Curtin Hill Building site coverage is 71.6%.
E. vista Bahn Building site coverage is 85%. (Variance tor 87.2/" denied 2003)
F. Clock Tower Buildino site coverage is 87o/;. (Variance lor 87.2/"denied in 19g1 )
G. Covered Bridge Buildinlsite coverage is g0%.
As can be seen by the information listed above, the property upon which you are reguesting a site
coverage variance currently possesses site coverage in excess to many of the other properties in the
{p run"uorn"o
ln order to remaining on this proposed schedule for review revised plans addressing the above
comments need to be received in the Communily Development Departmenl no later than Monday
March 1, 2004. Please review these comments and if you have any queslions regarding this letter
please conlact me at 970-479-2148.
llf '*"'o''| il ilil
{oLl.4#,#tiltrr/'^0tt[:;::_-::;*"','--" I
Cc: File
z
4
4oo
aE62"A&o
o- ul (/)ox;&\JLUo-t-g
'. (t
tioI l-oltoIro:
!]Jt<
;tqt.E
'e I
;tgii Ek
+Et : l,iffi
ii+ ti{jlfdfe 2EEr
I
lii
(J
tlJ
4
@
5
llr=:i*T I I Ip iESiEFr .rl l-i
tis sitsiEi* B: ilil!
.=
=5-Y=
=or-l 9'=
=l 3-eYl 6dEl ?crul E.9xt E!yt €iAI TFol:- 6 ululY (, >\Xl1 c'5Xl n 5o9li lr
"- l- < "-'| .. -Ezl= v" .9<l< x*dlg Y€
g
iio8 -rz
>-)€T
-dc)UNOoo
zo&.U-llJ
oFttt
z
x
LU
z
o-
o
o
]o
6o9'
T-b.d';;-n
;i6;y.
{t .!l :v: d
e;;
o-
-E .q
'tz_9.
E
o
=!
c;
l!
Attachment: B
zo
F
gl
J
ol
i-Bo<no.\JXfrAox=czl)t!LFOZ
r,]
eo
a
@
z
Itl
v.
-E - | |
!F* iE:igE- J l-i
iitsr 3i:iiisu il $!
El +jiil o o
ul -ao
ol Pt,nl 6 PYl =ir-l c Oalq e lxl- 9F
.l 6-Yzl+ 6 b/.\ | -\ _.r:ll- ? o-
<t.ii ..+' -tt H#
=lu \l IuJtrn z_=
]
c')
a.|
J}-uo=aa+ vXfi6oxtd(JUJo-F04
a/)
d
4
@
A-l
tl.l
v.
il)
--o
o
?"-
tlll
,.1 :l
NIJ
"1
rl
:t :lils*s€ssi$s,d
zo
F
ql
atl:
}.'.
-€-o)Z''7* E 6 -it E
= i o EP
--o -r]q _9 .Fi
O) tD.d q :F'! ==
g =.i.1 s-.E x!J iE3 };
-c5,yE'-U
9-E{'o
zo
EO
6=.::
=^ ou
- Y6
{ iF- <d_
<x*U Y9
F.z
d.
t_Ll
Fv)
uta
o-
o_
Zo
F
tu
fi
zo
F
s
Jul
Pr
RV6
Y h./,ox5ol (J uro-Foa
@
ats*seisiis,d,dd
E
-!
3
.Eo
-o-!4.:3*isi
333 [t-;' - Y3>; E
E
\
o)
.6::
o)
'i
UJ
(l)
3
{)
-!
;6
'-6,t .i
> --ooo
_.u
,: !-.:;
co;- qu
- E',6
-\ oo
'_ <o-.-o
= ru o)< h,-tr
Fz
odc rJ-
Fd
t'orcO
X u',
a)ex
-trZ
oll
ri
*LU
E
lu
u
Fz
LUu.o
r/)
oIIJID
a\
d
)
=
LL'
III
LlJo
ar, )
EEl
5 >l-Eo {l.F;E6 V6-.-E EO
3
U
orl
FI
cil
u.li
oiu-l
'6
E
I
'o3't
zIFL'ltl
UI
J
3
Fi
a,
@
a
Ir{
|d.
o"
xa6Yfrido*>d\Jr!o-t-e
<n
o
I
):
i;
6|:6
iF - i:lseEu .l I -l
i:sssg$isEs$sH=$!
(,
=ct
T.
.:
EE
dr6
.d oE*9Ootro-oc 9
so iHPO
rdi
Z?q
-!
E
o
o
od
i
o
C"
dr
yo x
s5 -:t!
:1i a o?l:-=E
ET i --;:: o-o dl o
"6 Ea a 9g*.S -6 e
o=o9 ] 6
-:- a .:6;'u o #'q'x a o, x.=oYc oc
or h''d o h>i! >-e3+ 8=&8_'S p;
o
_> {.,
qJ?
*5
d,!6_o-E:
\ozo)+-<
!
sir
--o90o)o-x
E= i'jiE
=l^9tu:
,< 1.€l9>i'o!i5z 4.9
t;
:-i ix.Y c;> ^c og: a6-tE .
cDv t;;3
'i 9p
.=.
=5-g='-U
dr. g
;o
-=
it
co
9 6>-: P5
s,,l Ad
- ?a.. 'Eg Fr:Q
\,/t z_ +
Fz
tu
oF
a
LIJ
o-r)
zoF
LIJ
E
lt_
o^
:u6od
eB
-!
ID
E
Y>r
9o,
'FtDoZ-a
o
lo
>
z
ii
(tt qrt-gt _ol
coi E:
=t ulo'o; 9l'Et ",1fE fi
e'l i -sJ,ilx Jlri"i ,..i,
uj l.= !r
I
'=
'-o
)
P''
,i
r--
I
@@ETM@@
ww\!.slifer.net
A torNr VENTUR! wrrH
lirrRrsorrs
March 9.2004
Mr. Wanen Campbell
Town of Vail
Ccmrnunity Development
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Warren:
I feel that the Minor Exterior Alteration I am applying for meets the Vail Village Urban
Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan.
In the Vail Village Master Plan, I will enurnerate the goals this proposal complies with.
Goal #1 It certainly is ofhigh architectural style and scale.
Goal #2 It helps promote tourism, will be more attractive to our visitors and is
certainly an upgrade.
Goal #3 The changes proposed will make the space much more attractive and
inviting to pedestrians.
Goal #4 ln CCl, this does not apply very well.
Goal #5 I don't believe it affects transportation or circulation.
Goal #6 This change will not affect service or delivery since all will be made
through the alley in back.
Also, in the sub area of Commercial Core 1, I feel it certainly complies and adds to all the
elements mentioned. Again, architecturally, etc. it becomes a better building and
especially improves as a retail space.
Vail Village Office
230 Bridge Street' Vail Colorado 81657 . Tblepbone 970 476 2421 . Facsimile 970 476 2655
@.4trt{a\t-E DAttachment C &Vail
Page 2
ln addition, I feel it will comply with and enhance the goals of the most recent streetscape
plan.
I hope this is enough information in outlining how we comply with the applicable master
plans and planning documents.
Best regards,
. ...t ,, r'7 l/fly'ik/r"A'dM,.-' Rodney E. Sllfer -
RESijt
-#'$*
THIS ITEM MAYAFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vaif will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6,Vail Town Code, on Aprll 12,
2004, at 2:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building, in consideration of:
A request for final review of a variance pursuant to Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code,
to allow for a new primary/secondary residence to encroach into the front and side setbacks and
a variance from chapter 10, off-street Parking and Loading, Vail rown code, to allow for
lequired parking to be located within the public right-of-way, located at 2830 Basingdale
Blvd./Lot 5, Block 9, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.Applicant: W.L. Broer ConstructionPlanner: Matt Gennett
A request for a minor exterior alteration pursuant to Section 12-78-7, Exterior Alterations or
Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for a commercial addition to the Slifer Building, located
at 230 Bridge StreeUlot B, Block 5, Vail Village 1't Filing, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant Slifer Buitding, LLCPlanner: Warren Campbell
A request for a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-16, Conditional Use Permits, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone
district, located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3'd Filing and
Lots C & D, Morcus Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.Applicant: Vail Corporation; represented by Mauriello planning GroupPlanner: Wanen Campbell
A request for conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-7E4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendment to the existing private club (i.e. parking club) conditional use permit,
Located.at 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)/Lots N & O, Block 5D, Vlit Vitiage l"tFiting, and setting
for details in regard thereto.Applicant: vail Gateway Plaza condominium Association, Inc., represented by Greg
Gastinear.rPlanner: Bill Gibson
A request for a variance from Section 12-21-14, Restrictions ln Specific Zones On Excessive
S!ope9, Vail Town Code, to allow for the construction of driveways and surface parking in excessof 10% of the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lof 9, Block G, Vail Das bchone
2nd Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.Applicant Snow Now, LLCPlannen Warren Campbell
A request for a work session to present an overview of the proposed redevelopment plans for the
Lionshead Core Site Hotel, located at 675 Lionshead Place{a'complete legal 'descriftion of theproposed development site is available at the Town of Vail Commuhity Derielopment Department uponrequest), and setting for details in regard thereto.Applicant: Vail CorporationPlanner: George Ruther
Attachment: D
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
,:"
, ,"i
,tt^'|?at
office hours at the Town otVOommunity Development Department,OSoutfr Frontage Road. The
public is invited to attend project orientation and the site visits that precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional
information.
Sign language interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call
(970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Published March 26, 2004, in the Vail Daily.
AD JACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
TO
230 BRIDGE STREET
Property Owner
Pepi & Sheika Gramshammer
Gasthof Gramshammer
231 East Gore Creek Drive
Vail
Dave & Rene Gorsuch
Gorsuch, Ltd.
263 Gore Creek Drive
Vail
Ron Riley
P & R Condominiums
228 Bridge Street
Vail
Charles & Elizabeth Koch RE Trust
4111 E.37th Street N.
Wichita, KS 67201-2256
Jim and Jearure Gustafson
Covered Bridge Building
50 E. Sample Road, Suite 400
Pompano Beach, FL 33064
Property Owned
Gasthof Gramshammer
231 Bridge Street
Lots C,D,E,F,G,H,I, Blk 58
Vail Village 1't Filing
Gorsuch, Ltd. & Ore House
263 Gore Creek Drive
Lots C,D,E, Blk 5C
Vail Village 1't Filing
P & R Condominiums @ussell's)
228 Bridge Street
Lot A, Blk 5C
Vail Village 1" Filing
P & R Condominiums
228 Bridge Street
Lot A, Blk 5C
Vail Village l't Filing
Covered Bridge Building
227 Bridge Street
Lot B, Blk 58
Vail Village 1" Filing
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLlC MEETING
Monday, April12,2004
PRoJEcr ORIENTATION - community Devetopment Depr. - puBltc wELcoME 11:00 am
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
David Viele
Ann Gunion
BillJewitt
Chas Bernhardt
Doug Cahill
George Lamb
Rollie Kjesbo
Site Visits :
1. Broer- 2830 Basingdale
2. Slifer-230 Bridge Street
3. Vail Gateway- 12 Vail Road
4. Snownow, LLC- 2388 Garmisch Drive
NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break lor dinner from 6:00 - 6:30
Public Hearinq - Town Gouncil Chambers 2:00 pm
1. Swearing in of new Commission Members
2. Appointmenl of Chair and Vice-Chair Doug Cahill (Chair) Chas Bernhardt (Vice Chair)
MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Roilie Kjesbo VOTE: Z-0
3. A request for final review of a variance pursuant to Seclion 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town
Code, and a variance from Chapter 10, Off-street Parking and Loading, Vail Town Code, to
allow for required parking to be located within the public right-of-way, localed at 2830
Basingdale Blvd./Lot 5, Block g, Vail Intermountain, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: W.L. Broer Construclion
Planner: Matt Gennett
MOTION: Rollie Kjesbo SEGOND: George Lamb
APPHOVED WITH CONDITIONS
Motion to approve the variance according to the criteria and findings lound in the
memorandum and the three conditions and two additional conditions.
Parking and driveways be snowmelted
Letter from Excel stating safety of vicinity of the home
Matt Gennett made a presenlalion per the staff memorandum. Upon review of the criteria and
findings, staff was recommending approval of the applicalion with conditions, as stated in the
staff memorandum dated April 12, 2004. The applicant's represenlative, peter cope,
addressed the Commission and stated the need for the variance. The Commission felt lhat the
requested variance exceeded what is acceptable for new construction. There were several
comments regarding the lack of snow slorage and a request for it to be heated. Some portion
VOTE:7-0
was acceptable. However, options should be exhausted to reduce the amount of variance
requested. The applicant responded to Commissioner comments regarding the design of the
house being driven by topography. Te Commission expressed safety concerns over ihe home
being so close to the gas relief valve. There was general consensus from the Commissioners
thal the third and fourth floors should be pushed back from the property line. The
Commissioners were concerned with parking and the effects of winter on the required parking.
4. A request for a minor exterior alteration pursuant to Section 12-75-7 . Exterior Alterations or
Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow ior a commercial addition to the Slifer Building, located
al 230 Bridge StreeVlot B, Block 5, Vail Village 1't Filing, and setting forth details in regard
thereto.
Applicant: Slifer Buitding, LLC
Planner: WarrenCampbell
MOTION: Chas Bernhardt SECOND: George Lamb
APPROVED WITH NO CONDITIONS
VOTE:7-0
Warren Campbell made a presentalion of the application per the staff memorandum. Staff was
recommending approval of the applicalion with no conditions. The applicant had nothing new toadd. There was no public commenl. The Commission members expressed their support.for
the application indicating thal the application complied with the applicible regulations outlined in
the Town's planning documenls.
5. A request for a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-'l6, Conditional Use Permits, Vail
Town Code, to allow for a temporary seasonal structure within the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 zone
district, located at 715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3'd Filing and
Lots C & D, Morcus Subdivision, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Corporation; represented by Mauriello planning Group
Planner: WarrenCampbell
MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Roilie Kjesbo VOTE: 6-1 (Jewiil)
APPROVED WITH FIVE CONDITIONS"
1. That the applicant shall not erect the tent prior to April 30, 2004 and that the
applicant shall remove the tent by no later than October 31, 2004.
2. That the hours of operation shall be from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, seven days a
week.
3. That the applicant's operation of the temporary seasonal structure comply
with all Town of Vail regulations regarding noise levels.
4. That the applicant install a minimum of six,50-gallon planting pots, containing
a combination of evergreen trees and flower plants in each pot, in association
with the Alternative 2 seasonal slructure location.
5. That the applicant receives a Town of Vail building permit prior to erecting the
tent.
Warren Campbell made a presentation of the application per the staff memorandum. Slaff was
recommending approval of the application with the five conditions as stated in the staff
memorandum. The recommended conditions were similar to those required in previous years.
The.applicant's representative made a brief presentation of the applicaiion and requesteO ftat
the hours of operation be amended lo allow the tent to be used until 10:00 pm daily, if needed.
There was no public commenl. The Commission members asked questions to clarify lheir
understanding of the application. Commission member Jewitt questioned the use of the tent to
address overflow capacity and whether the use complied with the regulations as stated in the
o
Zoning Code.
6. A request for conditional use permit pursuanl to Section 12-7E-4, Conditional Uses, Vail Town
Code, for an amendment to the existing private club (i.e. parking club) conditional use permit,
localed at 12 Vail Road (Vail Gateway)ilots N & O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1"t Filing, and setting
for details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Association, Inc.,represented by Greg Gastineau
Planner: Bill Gibson
MOTION: Rollie Kjesbo SECOND: David Viele VOTE: 6-1 (Lamb opposed)
APPROVED WITH THREE GONDITIONS:
1. This conditional use permit approval shall be valid upon the applicant
receiving Town of Vail approval tor the associated amendments to the Vail
Gateway Plaza Condominiums plat.
2. The use of parkang club spaces with the Vail Gateway Building shall be
limited to the parking of motor vehicles and shall not be used for other
forms of storage.
3. Tandem parking spaces designated for a restaurant use within the Vail
Gateway Building shall count as two required parking spaces when
associated with a valet parking management system; however, tandem
parking spaces designated lor a restaurant use within the Vail Gateway
Building shall only count as one required parking space when operated
without a valet management system.
Bill Gibson made a presentation per the staft memorandum and recommended one additional
condition that limited the use of the parking spaces to parking only. The applicant summarized
the applicalion. There was no public comment. The Commission member asked questions of
the applicant and staff. The Commission members expressed concerns with the applicant's
intent to use tandem spaces for guest parking and reslaurant patron parking. The applicant
indicated that up to 20 of the office parking spaces would be shared with the evening-only
restaurant use. Commission member Lamb expressed concerns selling individual deeded
parking spaces in the building.
A request for a variance from Section 12-21-14, Restrictions In Specific Zones On Excessive
Slopes, Vail Town Code, to allow for the conslruction of driveways and surface parking in
excess of 10% of the total site area, located at 2388 Garmisch Drive/Lot 9, Block G, Vail Das
Schone 2nd Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Snow Now, LLC
Planner: Warren Campbell
MOTION: BillJewitt SECOND: David Viete VOTE: 7-0
TABLED TO APRIL 26,2004
Warren Campbell made a presentation per the staff memorandum. The staff was recommending
denial of the applicant's request. The applicant, Greg Amsden, provided an overview of the
application .a.nd lvhy the application has been submitted. Norma Broden spoke under public
comment. Ms. Broden expressed support of the applicant's request to build on the property and
establish easemenls to clarify the driveway access. The Commission members believed that
establishing easemenls was the right way to address this issue. The Commission members asked
questions of the applicant and staff. The Commission members commended the applicanl for
working with the neighbors in an attempt to address lhe access problem.
A requeslfo,r a w-ork session to present an overview of the proposed redevelopment plans for the
Lionshead Core Site Hotel, located at 675 Lionshead Placei(a complete legal descriition of the
proposed development site is available at the Town of Vail Community Development Department
upon request), and setting for details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Resorts Developmenl Company
7.
8.
t
Planner: George Ruther
George Ruther made a brief presentation per the staff memorandum. The applicanl made a
presentation and provided an overview of the proposal. A copy of the applicant's presentation is
available at the Town of Vail Community Development Department. Geoff Wright and Jim Lamont
each spoke under public comment. Both expressed their support for the redevelopment of Lionshead
yet indicated a caulious concern about unintended negative consequences of the redevelopment.
For example, with success often come the unintended consequence of increased traffic and the need
lo manage that outcome. The Commission expressed their general satisfaction with concept of the
proposal. A crealion of a "sense of place" is crucial but the creation of a black hole where people
enter but never gel out to other areas of Lionshead should not be the intent of the redevelopment
project. lnstead, this redevelopment project should be the catalyst for the rejuvenalion of ALL of
Lionshead.
MOTION: Rollie Kjesbo SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 7-0
TABLED TO APRIL 26,2004
9. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special
Development District No. 38, Manor Vail Lodge, to allow lor the redevelopment of the Manor
Vail Lodge, and a request for a condilional use permit to allow for the construclion of Type lll
Employee Housing Units, pursuant to Section 12-6H-3, Vail Town Code, located at 595 Vail
Valley Drive/Lots A, B, & C, Vail Village 7th Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Manor Vail, represented by Melick and Associates
Planner: WarrenCampbell
MOTION: Rollie Kjesbo SECOND: George Lamb VOTE:7-0
TABLED TO APRIL 26,2004
10. Report to the Planning and Environmental Commission of an administrative action approving a
request lor a minor amendment pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail
Town Code, to allow for an amendment to the Approved Development Plan for Special
Development District No. 21, Vail Gateway, located at 12 Vail Road/Lot N & O, Block 5D, Vail
Village 1st Filing, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Applicant: Vail Gateway Plaza Condominium Association, Inc., represented by Greg Gastineau
Planner: Bill Gibson
There was no public commenl.
1 1 . Approval of minutes: March 8, 2004 and March 22,2004
MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Rottie Kjesbo VOTE: rt-0-2
1 2. lnformalion Update:
Chas Bernhardt and Bill Jewitt will be absent from the Mav 10. 2004 meetino.
13. Adjournment
MOTION: Bill Jewitt SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 7-0
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours al the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage noaO. tne
public is invited lo attend the project orientation and the site visits lhat precede the public hearing in the
Town of Vail Community Development Department. Please call (970) 479-2138 foi additional
information.
SLg_n_!?!9u1Sg interpretation is available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call (970)
479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Developmenl Department
Published, April 9, 2004 VailDaily.
I
in lhe
TOI4'NM
Application for Review by the
Planning and Environmental Commission
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General Information:
All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a
building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested.
An application for Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information
is received by the Community Development Departnent. The projed may also need to be reviewed by the Town
Council and/or the Design Review Board.
Type ofApplicafion and Fee:
El Rezoningtr Major SubdivisionE Minor SuMivisionn Exemption Plattr Minor Amendment to an SDDE New Special Development Districttr Major Amendment to an SDDtr Major Amendment to an SDD
(no exterior mdifrcations)
Description of the Request:Remodel the west elevation of a portion
of the Slifer Buildinq.
RECE IVEB
MAR 0 s 2004
$1300 tr$1s00 tr$6so X$6s0 E\
$1000 D
$6000 D
$6000 n
$1250 tr
tr
Conditional Use Permit $550
Floodplain Modification $400
Minor Exterior Alteration $650
Major Exterior Alteration $800
Development Plan $1500
Amendment to a Development Plan $250
Zoning Code Amendment $1300Variance $500
Sign Variance $200
Location of the Proposal: Lot: B Block:ll Subdivision;VaiI ViIIaqe 1st Filinq
Physical Address: 230 Bridge Street 'Vai1, CO 81657
ParcefNo.: 210108229002 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for pareel no.)
Zoning:cc1
Name(s) of Owner(s)t Slifer Buildinq, LLC
Mailing Address:
47 6-242L
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:Rodnev E. Slifer, Member
Mailing Address:230 Bridqe Street Vai1, CO 81657
Phone:47L-2]4
E-mail Address: rslifer@ slifer. net
Fg;ff"zuff$'''
Date:
Planner:
No.:
Page I of6-01/18/02
Fax 47 6-2658
lr| (\q
.fi t-
ft(,ed'dils'
a I
Land Title Guarantee Company
CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION
OUAR,\NTEt COIVIPANY
Date: 02-11-2004
Property Address:
Our Order Number: V5ffi04244
230 BRIDGE STREET AKA LOT B, BLOCK 5C, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING VAIL, CO 81657
SUFER SMITH & FRAMPTON-BRIDGE STREET
230 BRIDGE ST.
VAIL, CO 81657
Attn: ROD SLIFER
Phonc: 970-476-2421
Fax: 97O-476-7658
EMail: rslifer@slifer.net
Sent Via Courier**.*
If you have any inquiies or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below:
Ior Title Assistance:
Yail Title Dept.
Roger Avila
108 S, FRONTAGE RD. W, #203
P.O. BOX 357
vArL, co E1657
Phone:970476-2251
Fax: 970-476-4732
EMail: ravila@ltgc,com
I I
Land Title Guarantee Company
Land Title
Date: 02-11-2004
Our Order Number: V50004244
Property Address:
230 BRIDGE STREET AKA LOT B, BLOCK 5C, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING VAIL. CO 8165?
Buyer/Borrower:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Seller/Owner:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Need a map or directions fol you; upcomi.ng closing? Check out tand Titte's web site at wrwv.ltgc.comfor directions to any of our 54 office locatio"ns. -
ESTIMATE OF TITLE F'EES
Information Binder <1 ., tr nn
TOTAL g77s.oo
loe cor+TAc! {a/2003)THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER!
oI
Chicago Title Insurance Company
ALTA C OMMITMENT
Our Order No. V50004244
Schedule A Cust. Ref.:
Property Address:
230 BRIDGE STREET AKA LOT B, BLOCK 5C, VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING VAIL, CO 81657
1. Effective Date: January 30, 2004 ar 5:00 p.M.
2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured:
Inibnnation Binder
Proposed Insured:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
3' The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Sinple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
oo
Our Order No. V50004244
tEGAt DTSCRIPTIOfl
LOT B, BLOCK 5, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDINC TO THE RECORDED PLAT
THEREOF AND A PORTION OF LOT C, BLOCK 5, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, ACCORDING
TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SA]D LOT C WHICH IS A POINT OF TANGENT ON
THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRIDGE STREET; THENCE SOUTH 82 DEGREES 23 MINUTES OO
SECONDS EAST 55.06 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LrNE OF SArD LOT C; THENCE SOUTH 4
DEGREES 22 MINUTES 00 SECONDS wEsr 1.08 FEET: THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES 38
MINUTES OO SECONDS WEST 56.58 FEET TO A POINT ON A 92.30 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
WHICH IS THE EASTERLY LINE OF BRIDGE STREET; THENCE 4.50 FEET ALONG THE ARc oF
SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTRAL ANGLE IS 2 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 34 SECONDS
AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS NORTH 25 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST 4,50
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF EACLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ANY LAWFUL PURPOSE AS SET FORTH IN THE CROSS
EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED MAY 8, 1992 RECORDED IN BOOK 590 AT PAGE 760. COUNTY
OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO.
oo
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Sectionl
(Requirements) Our Order No. V50004244
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or nrortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or
interest to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrurnent(s) creating the estate or interest to be insurecl ust be executed and duly file<l for record,
to-wit:
Item (c) Payrnent ofall taxes, charges or assessments levied anil assessed against the subject premises which are clue
and payable.
item (d) Additional requiremenrs, if any disclosed below:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
oo
ALTA COMMITMENT
Schedule B - Section 2
(Exceptions) Our Order No. V50004244
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the tollowing unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
1 Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easernents, or clains of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in bourulary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and
inspectiort of the premises would clisclose and which are not shown by the public recorcls.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, fbr services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter firnisherl, imposed by law ancl
not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, enculbrauces, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires bf recorrl for
value the estate or irrterest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitnent.
6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records.o the Treasurer's office.
7. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, ifany..
8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the mortgage, if any, noted in Section I of Schedule B hereof.
g. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PR-EMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JIJLY 12, 1899. IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 475.
10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANAIS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 12. 1899.
IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475.
II. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE,
BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIG]ON,
SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS ORNATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTION 3607 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT
DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HANDICAP PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED
AUGUST 10, 1962,IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE I?9.
12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CROSS-EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORD;D
OCTOBER 05,1992IN BOOK 590 AT PAGE 760.
oo
ALTA COMMITMENT
ScheduleB-Section2
(Exceptions) Our Order No. v50004244
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
13, TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 05, 1992 IN
BOOK 590 AT PAGE 76I,
14. RIGHTS OF TENANTS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A, AS TENANTS ONLY, UNDER UNRECORDED
LEASES.
15. INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
PREPARED BY EAGLE VALLEY SURVEYING, INC. DATED JULY 20, 2OOO, JOB NO.
459-3. (BEING THE SAME ITEIVI REFRENCED ]N THE RECORDED DOCUMENT LISTED AS
ITEM 12 OF SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 OF THIS COMMITMENT.)
16. THE EFFECT ON SUBJECT PROPERTY OF BUILDINC OVERHANG AS SHOWN ON ALTA/ACSM
LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY EAGLE VALLEY SURVEYING, INC. DATED JULY 20,
2000, JoB NO. 459-3.
17. DEED OF TRUST DATED AUGUST 25,2W0, FROM SLIFER BUILDING LLC, A COLORADO
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF COUNTY FOR THE USE OF
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2,IOO,OOO.OO
RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2OOO, UNDER RECEPTION NO.737902.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO AMERICAN MEMORIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
IN ASSICNMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 2003, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 862480.
SA]D DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED
AUGUST 30, 2OOO, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 737903.
I8. FINANCING STATEMENT WITH FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY. THE SECURED
PARTY, RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2OOO, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 737904.
AMENDMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID FINANCING STATEMENT WAS RECORDED MARCH
14,2002, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 789080.
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE C OMPANY
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS
Note: Pursuanr ro CRS l0-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.
B) A Certificate ofTaxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction rnay be obtained frorn the County
Treasurer's authodzed agent.
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districrs may be obtained frour
the Board of County Cornmissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Effective Septernber l, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents receivecl for recording or filing
in the clerk and recorder's office slnll contain a top nnrgin of at least one inch and a left, right ancl bottorit
nargin of at least ole half of an irrch. The clerk and reconler may refuse to record or file any clocunent that
does not confom, except that, the requirement for the top rnargin shall not apply to clocunents using forms
on which space is provided for recording or filing infomration at tire top ruargin of the clocument.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulatiors 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article Vil requires that "Every
title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording
whenever dte title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal
docurnents resulting ftorn the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title GMrantee
Company conducts the closing of the insured traDsaction and is responsible for recording the
Iegal documents from the Eansaction, exception nuntber 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title
Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deleti0n
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Comrnitrnent from the Owner's Policy to be
issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitnent must be a single family residence which
includes a condoninium or townhouse unit.
B) No labor or matedals have been furnished by nreclnnics or material-men for purposes of
constnrction on the land described in Schedule A of this Comrnitment within the past 6 months.
C) The Company must receive an appropriafe affidavit indernnifying the Company against un-filed
mechanic's and material-men's lieru.
D) The Colnpany nust receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E) If there has been constmcdon, irnprovemenls or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within six nonths prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage
fbr unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain constructiol infonnation; financial infonnation
as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate prernium fully
executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additioml requirements
as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid infonnation by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circuustances for labor or rnaterial for which the insurecl
has contracted for or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-ll-123, notice is hereby given:
Tlds notice applies to owner's policy comuritnents containing a ruineral severancc imtrunrent
exception, or excepdous, in Schedule B, Section 2.
A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a thircl party
holds soure or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothennal energy in the property; and
B) That such mineral estate rray include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's pennission.
Nodring herein contained will be deemed to obligate the courpany ro provide any of the coverages
referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied.
Form DISCLOSURE 09/01/0?
oo
:. a I
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company and
Land Title Guarantee Company
July 1,2001
We recognize. and r-espect.the privacy expectatious of roday's consuners and the requiren)ents of applicable fetleral and
sla-Ie prlvacy-.laws. We hellev€ that maklng you aware o[how we use your ntur-puhlic personal inltomration ( "Personallntonnarlon'), and to whonl-it is disckrsed, will fonn rhe basis for a rblarioushib of truisr between us and the public
that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides rhat_ explanariorr. We reserve rhd right to change rhis Privacy'
Sratenrenr fronr riure ro tirric consisrent'with appticable'privacy laws.
In the course of our business, lve may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
* lrorrr applicarions or othe.r fonns wc reccive fronr you or your authorized representative;?' l-ronr your trarsacti()ns with, or frorl: the services being perfomred by. us, our affiliates, or others;* From 6ur internct web siresl+ Fro.q the puhlic recordj_ rnaintained. by goverruuenral entiries rhat we either obtain clirectly from thoseenirnes, or trotu our ath lrates or others: and+ From consuner or orher reportitrg agencies.
Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Inflormation
We ntaintain physical, elecronic and proce<.lural safeguanis to protect your Personal lnfomration fronr unauthorized
access or lfltmslon. we llmlt access to the Pcrsonal Information only to those employees who fleed such access inconnection with providing products or services to you or tbr other tigitimatC busineis purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of your personal Information
W-e -nay.9,!a1e your Pcrsonal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, ancl other real
estate sertlenlenr service providers. we also rnay disclose your persornl lntbmratiori:
j to a.g.eqts, brokers or represenatives to provicle you wirh services you have requested;* to thlrd-party contractois or service provirlers who provide servicris or perfomi markering or orherfunctioni on our behall and* to others with whonr we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe youmay find of interest.
In addition. we will disclose your Personal Inlbnnarion when you direct or.qive us permission, wbelr we are reouiredDy^law to do so, or when I',e suspecr fiaudulent or crim inal acfivities. We also uav disclose vour Personaltntonnatlon wlrcn otherwise pemritted by applicable privacy laws such as. for exainple, wheir disclosure is neededto enf.rce our rights arisiug out rfany agre'e'menr, trinsaciiori oi riiiudiijtrii wi* ii<ru.
,Ol-: -,]l
rL9 important responsibilities of some of our affiliated.compauies is to record documents in the public
Oomallr. sucn documents may contain your personal Information.
Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion
Certain states afford yorr tllc right to access your Persorul Intbmratiol and, uruler certain circumstances, to find outto wnom your Personal Intormatton has beerl disclosed. Also, certain srates afford vou the rishr to reouesr
llllT^tt^o,]:,ll9nStent or delction of your Personal tufbrmation. We reserve the rilhr, wher6 permirt6d by law, tocnarge a reasorHbte tee to covef the costs incurred in responding to such requests. -
#l,ltq^"-g:,1 .w.U, tttittcd nr the Ficle lity, Na-tioual .Financ.ial Group of Companies/Chicago Tirle Insurauce Conrpanysna be ln wntlng, and delivered ro the followins address:
iriuacv co-ntiance Officer
Fidelitv National Firnncial. Inc.
4050 Calle Real, Suite 220
Santa Barbara. CA 931 10
Multiple Products or Services
l!::.P^*y;{.^ll$-Yr]lr por€ than one fir.rancial product or service. you nray receive nrore [han one privacy noticerronl us. we apologrze lor any Inconveluence this nlay cause you.
FoTm PR I V. POL. CH I
I0t4nm
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South frontage Road, Vail, Oolorado 81657
tel: 970,479.2139 fax: 97A.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Slifer Building Remodel DRB Number: DRB040037
Proiect Description:
REMODEL FRONT PORTION OF THE SLIFER BUILDING, REQUIRED A SITE COVERAGE
VARIANCE, PROPOSAL WENTTO DRBTWICE AND ATTHE SECOND MEFNNG STAFFWAS
DIRECT TO STAFF APPROVE THE APPUCATION ONCE PEC HAD APPROVED THE MINOR
EXTERIOR ALTEMNON.
Participants:
OWNER SUFER BUILDING LLC 02/09/2004 Phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
APPUCANT SLIFER BUILDING LLC 02/09/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
. License:
Project Addrcss: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL Location:
230 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
Legal D$criptioni Lott B Block: 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FILING 1
Parcel Number: 210108229002
Comments: SeeConditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Action: gfAFFApR
Second BylVote: DateofApprova[ A4fl312004
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written @nsent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s),
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
C.ond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
@nd:202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
or nn"r aptval, unless a buirding permit is irru"o unot truction is commencedand is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond; CON0006368
Tiis approval does not include. any of the awning or window signage conceptually
shown on the plans approved Uy OnS and pEC.
Wanen Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $3O0.OO
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2457
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: SLIFER BUILDING VARIANCE
Project Description:
PEC Number: PEC04000B
REMODEL FRONT PORTION OF THE SLIFER BUILDING. WILL REQUIRE A SITE COVERAGE
VARIANCE.
Participants:
OWNER SLIFER BUILDING LLC 02109/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
APPUCANT SUFER BUILDING tLC 02/09/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAiL
co 815s7
License:
Project Address: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL Location:
230 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
Legal Descriptiont Lot: B Block 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FIUNG I
Parcel Number: 210108229002
Comments: See Conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: George Lamb
Second By: Rollie Kjesbo
Vote: 5-1 (Cahill Oppposed)
Conditions:
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
a pprova l.
Cond: CON0006378
That the applicant reduces the size of the proposed awning to extend no more than
four feet from the face of the building.
Planner: Warren Campbell pEC Fee paid: $500.00
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approval: 03/08/2004
Planning and Environmental Commission
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
TOllIN
Project Name: SLIFER BLDG. ALTEMTION
Project Description:
PEC Number: PEC040013
REMODEL FRONT PORTTON (WEST ELEVAION) OF THE SUFER BUTLDTNG.
Pafticipants:
APPUCANT SLIFER BUILDING LLC 03/10/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 815s7
License:
OWNER SUFER BUILDING LLC 03/10/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
Project Address: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL Location:
230 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
Legal Description: Lot: B Block: 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE RUNG 1
Parcel Number: 210108229002
Comments: SeeConditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
vote:
CondiUons:
Chas Berhardt
George Lamb
7-0
Action: APPROVED
Date of Approvalz AilL212004
Cond: B
(PllN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of rown of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 300
PEC approval shall not be not become valid for 20 days following the date of
approval.
Planner: WarrenCampbell PEC Fee Paid: $650.00
.ri
.B+-+a
N
\t\
$
\$"
N"
\
\il$
"i
\
\
Nt$
"$t\)\
N
q)fv-st
tfi; IJ
+ $$
F+;itetr€€
tl.IL
Fu,
EE€*'jt
fiul
i,r
'2,
!2U'a5Eo()
Js(F-2
l.r,lEzoo:
zIU
D' S'
.er!EI-ro
if3iloz>zz
EF3
trlllzz
5G
uiko
sga
,54
E*Ee
H?AEd.VJ=q'*6sE
=ztu
H
z
J4
4ooJE
Fazo
He6Yhaox=oZ \J TUcFsa
F4
€
@
Oz
E{g
Z
3
1=!-t \J
z
loEsO
\
(\
oa
=
\o
N
N
o
=
\
N
e.i
I
=
's
$ i:isss==
d.
;ss*s si;iiFiu :,:
EEt8
> --ooo
L;o
)Ftro
eEoi
.= !,
cOq 8l- P5rr Eg
J oo
:.I<o-..rc5FE
s2+
Fzoe.
Lt-
LUd.oF
<J)
o
LLI(n
oo-oe.o-
z
-,1o-
r-" :"\\- i.-t" i'i"*'--i- " l
o9.o9
drX., o)
o-tr
ioO!TE,=-:d:>6l.F CT9r|O
6C.
ie,8Th6tFt
ei E
6.Epgj;
oiE'f,trcoJ;;
5oo-
]orc
>oz
c)
t-
o
=(J
>
c;
X
I.IJ
o
r'b8i
i-oEOIrrr E(fu
NOot1t.) e.
t."*"-
\I C.t\>io
t__olo
I ctJ
tct>t{
I
t-E -f--ODc t,/, I.='ol 6 o -l*HE :5 El x
EEE ; E EIE6 -t - 6- ol q)s=E;* El+
i;+ f ;*'$l I
X q'i b== >lo-
Ee [ 3j i2lr
# Fs 2=E -t-
;-.'
tl
{
Ua
FzouLt-
LUu.oFa
Oz
=.n
=LIJ
z
-to-
o
o
oo-
;o
c;
XllJ
i- l1I tl l1- 1 -i
^.-- .'l'- ^
", -, "i
*-t
-.. .. .l
,.-t.
i- --r "il
)f'' I "-'.i-*"-'' rll:itlotldsy
llotlosv
zIF
sulJtll
Faza
tLJ ^7KVOvfll-o- LU l/)ox>d \J IIILj-e(n
H
A|qliq4
@AV
EH
M
w
O
.F
O
I
I'l-zl.
vl*tz'l=ll"r'r lldaOloO
o.
E
C{
p
N
I
=
!s $ i:ssgF:
d,
;sis,sii$isiui,:
EEE3o..> --ooo
_t-;o)-
EO
eEoi
=6cO1 0eY (J>.
- P5rr Eg
J oo
:.8<o-..75 dio
u v9tn z-=
Fzoe
lJ-
IJ-Jlv
oF(n
Oz
=.n
><
LIJ
z
aF,s
LIJ
-tLIJ
loo-
;o
.E
.2xtrt
.g"E
€iEE
E€eg
E€gE
zo
F
slllJgl
Fa z.n
xe6\-//' l!
-o- uJ (,ox>d\JLULl-oztn
H
AAFiq
e,
@
o
E
ITJ
M
z
F
d>a\C|
z-
;
IIl:doliss*Fgi$iii,dddl
o
o
-o(l)
o
ccL
QIJ
>c
.I
-2
€ -o)E 5 *e
qa v F+.r CD =!^rco o .E hs>s rc ! o)C_ (D T c'-o E q'NiE r X€
cr)
:
-o
o)
.E
x
|.IJ
EE
=8o'c>-ooo
L;o>-tro
rEoi
=b-IJ Ecoq 8l- PErr Egs 8;:.E<o-..rc
-,t. dir
-r Fitd oetn z-*.
Fzoe.
Lt-
IJ-Je.oF(n
o
LU
U)oLoe.izo
r-:
5
LIJ
c;
xo
I
o
I
c)
:
qt
tro
o
;
0)z
Eo
x
o
;0)z
o;-e..;
;= g;
XiEtt
9.s t 6'
+
jt$
=B= i!
od
oo
Loo-
o_ou
]
0)z
to._9A)o- o).rcip€5
.i.=;g
'.il
-P
o
3
o
ou
;
Xtl-l
lt
lii
-.T--
EI;cl;9lxrlo
Ole
blJj;t9ol-tJ|,olo
oJpo l.=
--13>l f-+tq)l\,.t l-
ol,4Llo--v-.
zo
F
lllJtll
Fazot!/a7
680o- LU (/)ox=04 \J [JL-U.n
s
4
@
o
E
Edg
Q
T
O
z
3
0r=a'\ cl
Z-
;
rJ]=dolissuigisE$s,dddl
rcp
'=
^o-s,)P'= 6'= utlo:6EE
,n rtt ) u,;oc !l; ='= Y
d-\ f XulE ';
o
-oo
o
To-oo
frC
@.- o
Eo
.N
rco
E
E'tr
Eoo
=:
-o
O)
xUJ
*A
Ego'.> --ooo
;o
coPto3
=;rcccOq 8l:- P5rr ?gs F;\ :'E<o-
= [r oJ
u v9u) z_=
b
tl
{
di
(J
.J)
Fzoe.
Lt-
LUe.oFU)
o
LUgr v)9l ool o-o-l a-lvl v
-l u.':- | o-
-l-+- z-l oot =ft <E<.1
=LU
LUo
V)
I
01cl
]l<l,.i
di
o)CE
Cl]c
t4)9 "g8Ei
TI
tlolo
I
o
oi
t/, I
p
)o-'tc
't
:
X
I.IJ
Fzno0rvcu-
IJ.JtreE96arcO
ar tJ-J5ReY;or- u.oo-
-ez
o\r
i.E g*5
LU
dJ
xu-l
i
9i
zo
FIEI|n
JJ
3
aZ-ao=ne\JXhaoxtd. \) t!o,--oZa
t&J
ffi
a.
@
O
a
H
V
z
0i:
.rO
z
o
a/)
srEo<O
:E :=-:€*E | | I".! il tis:FEE xl I -l -
i:isrsi.iiiSs!=!!i
q,
Xo
'--- I}E:E
l-odE
:chc)t>corE
E'?x.=oE
9s
-- ftei
c)
=
=oo*o)
>-c
h-io
oodU
re
]b -0Po t-
o)Xod 'oJ9 0v, 9E
Yr-o< aa
LL.\o o+. lJ .YI *Fx g-f.Lr z- -
t9t;lo
ho_n9
P:
dp
o-6
T,=oy
5EP.9
oo-
]o
i-
Xtu
t-
o)
c)c'a
o;i
l,=.):c !g
eE:ir I f1pYcc:r | OSE{i€=* ; :fx;*=ij i Sil;
;tf "-q 3Err YJ E-= - oTgra€ E-g 9"0.9.=' v 9i o - l
E=E lj : i ;i*E--r > E =i | ;:,,rr! > (J . | !r, \J Fr
=S
=o!- (J
> --ooo
t-;o)-
EO,n'4
oi
=;cO;-.' ouY- PEtt 5o
:,Xr--(\ (l) 0:.8<o-
5 Liio
() v a)oZ+
zr'\
&.u-
LIJu.
U)
o
LU
U>oo-oe.o-
Zo
F
IIJil
I
I
I
II lll
l.-rd
oq,o-.=
-lE9-)s;o
^TtIOr.L u
o^
TU6.d
=9co -O
c)
E
:|^xx
---\Jtt\o_> \r.,ac
;'NooZ-a
)oo-
)o
;
o)z
gl
i-.ololc'
siol
tnl
-l
ErXIuJI
,.ilYIu-|
ctl
coi
O1
I?1 |
-o rrc<'t c
.r6
,nlX'xts,|.riI;
^
| Ll-\-.t-d l.=
I
'=
Eq)
o
)o
-'t
.:
Xt.L
S
/\
o
-YI
cO
Proiect Name: Slffer BuiHing Remodel
Project Description:
ACTION FORM
Department of C.ommunity Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado B1657
tel 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co,us
DRB Number; DR8040037
REMODEL FRONT PORTION OF THE SLIFER BUILDING. REQUIRED A SITE COVEMGE
VARIANCE. PROPOSAL WENT TO DRB TWICE AND AT THE SECOND MEFNNG STAFF WAS
DIRECT TO STAFF APPROVE THE APPLICATION ONCE PEC HAD APPROVED THE MINOR
EffERIOR ALTEMTION,
Pafticipants:
OWNER SLIFER BUILDING LLC 02/09/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VA]L
co 816s7
License:
APPLICANT SLIFER BUILDING LLC 02/09/2004 phone:
230 BRIDGE ST
VAIL
co 81657
License:
ProjectAddressl 230 BRIDGE STVAIL Location:
230 BRIDGE STREET, VAIL, CO
Legal Description: Lot: B Block 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE FIUNG 1
Parcel Number: 210108229002
Comments: See Conditions
Motion By:
Second By:
Votel
CondiUons:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Action: STAFFAPR
Date of Approval: 041 1312004
Cond: B
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of rown of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: 201
DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval.
Cond: 202
Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date
of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and
and is diligently pursued toward completion.
Cond: CON0006368
This approval does not include any of the awning or window signage conceptually
shown on the plans approved by DRB and PEC.
Warren Campbell DRB Fee Paid: $3OO.OO
o
construction is commenced
o
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Generat Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review
cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The
project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within
one year of the approval.
Description of the Request:Remodel the west elevation of a portion of the
IiEiFiVED
'-"Ug l*t4
T0r44V
LocationoftheProposali Lot: B Block: 5-C Subdivision:vail Villase lst Filine
PhysicalAddress: 230 Bridge Srreet Vall, Co 81657
parcel No.: 2L0LO8229002 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
zoningi CCI
Name(s) of Owner(s):S1lfer Building, LLC
230 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657
Phone: 476-242I
Name of Applicant:Rodney E. Slifer. Member
Mailing Address:230 Bridge Street Vai1, C0 81657
Mailing Address:
Owner(s) S-gnature(s):
Phone: 476-2421
E-mail Address: rsliferGslifer.net Faxi 476-2658
Type of Review and Fee!
tr Signs
E Conceptual Review
tr New Construction
I Addition
tr Minor Alteration
( m ultFfam ily/com mercial)
tr Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
tr Changes to Approved Plans
tr Separation Request
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demolrebuild.
$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window addiuons, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
$20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board.
No Fee
Fl'ffff""SqP"'t' che6x p6.;/i 28 ,r,
tI
GLEN RAVEN MILLS, INC.
Sun6re[k@
Style 4633
Linen