HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5 LOT C D E CLOCK TOWER BUILDING AKA MCBRIDE GORSUCH 1983 - 1995 DRB LEGAL' ,u()/l'r I
f\ . !r/-Lri
Design Review Action Form
TOWN OF VAIL
Date t'| '1{
Proiect Name:
) Building Name:
Project Description:
ArchitecVor<6t@ Address and phone:
Legal Description: Lot _ Block_ Subdivision zoneDistrict(? J--
Projec! Street Address:
Comments:
Board / Staff Action
Motionbv: ., / zl Vote:
.. /, r 'r/
Seconded by:
I Approval
D Disapproval
2(statf
Aocrwal
Conditions:
Y{*/ ,{tf V, cr$,ry"- fu /,},
frfr^*,q1 "l- "// rf't'+q ? f -
(J'tn*"Zl Y*
onn i ( I{ DRBFee ,,.-r,{ 0o rt/4 ll?11
,i t.rt d, AllT 191
DBSIGDT REVIBVT BOARD APPIJIqAETON ' TOIIN
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:**********
INCOMPIJWE APPTJICATTONS TTAY NgT BE SCHEDOIJED FOR RFU/IEW.
***t******
I.
A.*o \ \ .,^^^PTION:
{v' t\ r ...+\-
,^ri\ I
5,
la4-
+
B.TYPE OF REVIEWT o^-\3-,frfl -t,-
^.\
o:t<'
6!.*"r-e ^
New consrrucrion ($200 .oU -Ainor Alrerarion ($20.00)Addirion (950.00)Concepiual Review ($0)
c.
D.
ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lot Block9ubdivision
rf property is described bydescription, please provideto this application.
a meets and bounds
on a separate sheet
legal
and attach
E.
F.
ZONING:
NAI{E OF
Mailing
APPLICAIVT
Address:
Phone
G.NA}48 OF
Mailing
APPLICAI!'I'!REPRESENTATIVE:
Address:
Phone
H.NAI{E OF OWNER(S) :
Mailing Address:
Phone
APPITICATIONS j{IIJIT NOf AE PROCESSED WIIHAW OrlNERt S SIG/rIIAII\IRE
Condominium Approval if applicable.
DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at thetime of subtnittaL of the onn application. Later, whenapplying for a building pennit, pLease identify the accurat,evaluation of the proposal . The Torrn of vail will- adjust thefee accordinq to the table be1ow, to ensure the correct fee
I.
.t.
FEE SCHEDULE:
VAIJUATION
$ 0 $ 10,000
,P turuvJ. - P furuuu
$ 50, 001 - g 150, 000
$150,001 - $ 500,000
$500, 001 $1, 000, 000g over 91,000,000
DESTGN RE\IIEW BOARD APPROVAIJ E:I(PIRES
APPROVAL IJIIIJESS A BUIIJDING FERIdIT IgIS STARTED.
FEE
$ 20.00
$ f U. UU
$100.00
$200 .00
$400.00
$500. 00
ONE YBAR AFTER FINAIJ
ISSUED AIID CONSTRUCTION
IV. NEI{ CONSTRUCTION
A. Three copies of a recent topographic survey, stamped bya Colorado Professional lJiceased Surveyor, aL a scaleof 1" = 20' or 1arger, on which the followinginformation is provided:
1. IJot area, and buildable area when different than1ot area.
2. Legal descripLion and physical address.
3. Two foot. contour intervals unless the parcelconsisls of 6 acres or more, in which case, 5 r
contour intervals may be accepted.
4. Exist,ing trees or groups of trees having trunrswit.h diameters of 4" or more, as measured from apoint one foot above grade.
5. Rock outcroppings and other significant naturalfeatures (targe boulders, intermittent streans,etc. ) .
6, Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfa11, etc.),centerline of sLreams or creeks, required creek orstream setback, and 100-year flood p1ain, ifapplicable. Stopes of 40t or more shatl beclearly delineated by cross haEching.
'?. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS tandnarkor sewer invert. This information musl be clearlystated on Lhe survey so that all measurements arebased on the same starting point. This isparticularly important for debermining buildingheight and driveway slope. See policy On SurveyInformation, for more infornation regardingsurveys.
8. I-,ocations of the following must be shown:
a. Size and tlpe of drainage culvert,s, swales.
etc -
b. Exact locaLion of existing utility servicelines from Lheir source to the slructure,including:
Cable TV
Telephone
Sewer GasWater Elect,ric
c. A11 utitiEy meter locations, including anypedestals Lo be located on site or in theright-of -way adjacent to the sit.e.
at. Property lines - distances and bearings and abasis of bearing.
e. IndicaLe all easements identified on thesubdivision p1at.
9. Provide spot elevat,ions at Lhe edge of asphalt,along the street frontaqe of Lhe property aLtwenty-five foot intervals (25'), and a minimum ofone spot elevation on either side of the 1ot.
B. Sit.e PIan
1. L.,ocat.ions of the following must be shown:
a. Existing and finished grades.
b. Proposed surface drainage on and off site.
I to fascia, trim, railings. chimney cap. meterlocations, etc. must be shown graphically andfu11y dinensioned.
Zone check list (attached) must be completed if theproject is located within the Single-fami1y,Prirnary/Secondary or Duplex zone districts.
Phot,os of the existing site and where applicabl_e, ofadjacent structures.
The Zoning Administrator and,/or DRB may require thesubmission of additional plans, drawings, -
specifications, sanples and olher materials (includinga model) if deemed necessary to determine whether aproject will comply with oesign Guidelines.
H.
I.
It MINOR AI.,TENATIONS TO EHE E:CIERIOR OF BUTIJDINGS.
Photos or sket,ches which clearly convey the redevelopmentproposal and Ehe location (site plan) of the redevelopmentproposal may be submitted in lieu of tbe more formalrequirements set forth above, provided alL inporbantspecifications for the proposal including colors andmat,erials to be used are submitted.
N)DITIONS . RESIDEMTIAIJ OR COTTIMERCTAI,
A. Original floor plans with aIl specifications shown.
B. Ttrree set.s of proposed floor plans L/9" -- 1r or larger(L/4rr = 1t is preferred)
C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing andproposed construction. IndicaEe roof ridqe elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
D. Elevations of proposed addition.
E. PhoLos of t.he existing structure.
F. Specifications for all materials and color samples onmaterials list (attached).
At the request of the Zoning Adninistrator you nay also berequired to subnit:
c. A statement from each utitity verifying locat,ion ofservice and availability. See attached utilitylocation verif icaE,ion f orm.
H. A site improvernent survey, stamped by reqistered
CoLorado Professional Licensed surveyor.
I. A preliminary Litle report, to verify ownership ofproperty, which lists all easemenLs.
VII. FINAI, SIEE PIJAIV
Once a buildinq permit. has been issued, and construction isunderway, and before the Building Department will schedule aframing inspection, two copies of an rmprovement r,ocationCertificate survey (tl,C) scamped by a registeredprofessional engineer must be subnitted. The followinginformation must be provided on the ILC:
A. Building locaLion(s) with ties to property corners,i.e. distances and angles.
B. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot.
vI .
IJIST OF IIATERIAI-.S
t1L,.I|AME OF PROiIECT:
IJEGAI, DESCRTPTTON:
STREET ADDRESS:
The foLlowing information is
Review Board before a final
EIJOCK SI'BDIVISION
s4,-
required for submittal
approval can be given:
1rYPE OF MAtrERIAI/
LOT_
A.
to the Design
COLORBUTIJ}ING IiATERIAI.IS :
Roof
Sidins
Other Wall- Materials
Fascia
Sof f it,s
Wind.ows
Wind,ow Trim
Dgora
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior lJighting
Other l--,'c*4
oesignerr*B.I.ANDSCAPING: Name of
Phone:
rrr : t\t* A.o'.^q \L *lo'-|^.
a
reviret 8/L7 /9a
iTOB NAITIE
rOTIN OF VAIIJ T'IIIIJITY IJOC"ATION 1'ERIFICAtrION FORM
SUBDTVTSION
IJOT BI,OCK FIIJING
ADDRESS
The form is used to verify service availabil.ity and location. thisshould be used in conjunction with preparing your ptility plan andschedul-ing installauions. For any new const.ruction proposlL, theappricant musL provide a completed ut,ility verification- tonn.
The location and avaiLabiliry of uLilities, whether they be main
lrunk Lines or proposed lines, must be approved and verified by thefollowing utilities for the accompanying-sile plan.
All authorizing siqrnatures need to be originals.
Authorized Signature Date
U,S. west Communications
458-5860 or 949-4530
Pub1ic Service Company
949 - 513s
Gary Hal-1/Rich Cooley
Holy Cross ELectric Assoc.
949 -5892 Engineering Depr,.
Ted Husky/t'lichael Laverty
**TCI CabLevision of the Rockies
949 -t224
Mark Graves
**Upper Eagle Vall-ey WaEer
& SanitaLion District *
47 6 -7 480
Fred Haslee
NOTE: 1.
**A site plan is required. physicar location of known utiritiesnust be shown on tbe siLe pran. utiliEy l0cations tnay or nay notoffer senrice to the property line. eny utirity extension rlquiredshal-l be the responsibility of the property ormer.
If a utility company has concerns with the proposedconstrucEion, the utility representative should notdirecLly on the utility verification form that, thereis a problen which needs to be resoLved. The issueshould then be spelled out in detail in an aLtachedletter to Lhe Town of vai1. However, please keep inmind thaL it. is the responsibility of rhe utilitt
company to resolve identified problens.
If the utility verification form has signatures fromeach of the utility companies, and no comments are
made directly on the form, the Town wilL presumethat. there are no problems and that the developmentcan proceed.
These verificat,ions do not. relieve the contractor ofhis responsibility to obtain a street cut permit
from the Town of Vail, Department of public Worksand to obtain utititv locations before dioqing inany public right-of-way or easement in the Town ofVail. A buildino permit is not a street eut permit.
A street cut permit must be obEained separatel.y.
InstalLation of eervice Lines are aL the expense andresponsibility of the property owner.
4.
Jalalo0 ;'1, Irac/
Nunb€r Ptice
t: ,aK g2 /.60tFff€-ktr?0
SpBl
Calalog Pztfa+
Numbor &tce
, "3S.BK 1; t5.20
t)atafog TcPe<1
Number Az'cc
: i FrniSh)
:I'BK_-t8.4!
.:.n1.sp9 g /3.40
iPr iElack Finish)^'!!y-_E!,E!
,rn --tzb
:;t ,r.i.rri Aren&,
luma After-sunset Spec ia lty L i ghti ng
Ef'Ilf,ll.Tllt
IJftlld cahlE P1y!4t/
LlmolY!€ llumber ')1i.|
20w.35t!MF16 tt0t1_Bt1 1:2 /.64
'SFrycoro, C.ct,nr !.! l.eri C,!,+. r'2m!.' CC'o'F llals
0C base frnwifu/nA
flnirh: Elack {8K) Wf ile(WH)
Sir!: ?.88 1x2' 13ne1!l
'I!011 issuDolied w th ihe TAXl2
Cafalog ?.t4ott
ius€ylilh 1|IAX12)
ihxCellLouver TA1,l4
(usetrihtTAxl2)
$2.20
ttomExte,nsion IAxl1'8K $9.8O
Sla€:5"1x3 25'Wr 1 88'deDlh
tAy.l1.wN 4r.ga
3'lteqd9attte 14X13 gg.go
rilFiI@IEr
i,i,t.^ te1( L'.1
Lens Ccvet
lsu!o ?c)
Waltags/ Calalo! 1r!'4'/
LamDTvoe l{umb€rffi@
ri6a .wH r ,- 6 no
tinlsh: B :ak iBt(' \1" r"ljjHl
Size:5 13 | t 2 2: !^i 1!:: r
T1-o13
Catalog PtePatT
Acclssorios Nunbsr ,A.ca
Color fllrers TAFI3' !5 2A
'so'f1.i..a.:4i ir.: ,.1. .' t.'-ri
(use \" lhrTAHl:l _ ,
Lcuver/tilrelH)l0ef lA113.BK 56.40
TP'-:+-wn V;74
1AN13-SPB S / /.4O
HexCe ltolver IAL15 $4.40
wrt 0si calaloq ;':. t'1':
,str#,.hr#.*-"%
Cslalog ?*Fo+
":-":: \:::. a.ii? i,r :. ?.ri: C.! r.- A,;FDa.
i!sev tf 'TAC01lH"efrL,'"e -1!Jr--Zm
(irs?wiihtTAC0l)
Size:9 5 L x3 25 Wx2.25'dePlh
C o!,s u | | | ecia ty iu ava i I ab|, 1 |
OlIuOrcSce ltixtutes
Slre:233 L\l l::J .ir.rIr.[rr
MNH.2 $d.oo
r rtt.n.ltL0.!E hxnttorn.t tnd aAo/ Ihteadtt
staL ncldtd atn lo, tattrc. hhcto flood htlut0r
Wadalei Cataloe nyn,
Lamo Tvo! Numbel P1i'.
PL'l3WlsLr!! i rr llS621l'BK S24,OO
2 CJf lr.rl5lrlrlrlllll
(12 Voll)'
Fil;,v,,twro)ffi.1lxg24.oo
(l20Volr)
iirP,.rJm.,.r. ,, t'tS6.'26 BK 936.OO
{l lVorr) _'',,), r,,\ fl:,t;.'.\; 1lll, $j'6,4G
(r2llVL'1
Finish:lli,i, i
Sire;! /5 r \{i:'i \!\ i5 in'lrlh
Moultin0: I J Tlrf.(iL{]Sl/llrvfl
Nl|'Ji titi,r, ,\ llis'.rr,' (lnrd $ PILrC
rf rir., S?4.OO
finlsh: Black i8l(). ve!delvE)
Slrs:5.13 1x2 25'W (sq.)x 10.51 'H
calolog ':z(iAccessorros Numbet ,i- ,
Slandafdslake 0A05 52. SO
Lensoover lACll.BK $.!;.20
lAQqt-WP' 95.20
ColorFllers TAtl2'' 93.60
'sorc 'l.t r' [,.rea,. arorue q.l!o G,!'eti. (.anba
(usewtlh rTAC0l)
tri'ffitowg --aLil-TrZA
{l sp $,l11rAc01)
Calalog ,'/1f t14r/
ONE CALL DOTS ITALL!
Slro:2.44 1r4 688 C,3nelel
r^c,01.fiB i5.20rAt',2: $r,60
LamoTvoe
20w'50u/MRt6
llumter ?',,,c
6124-8t\ $24.40
tlnish:Black(BKI Verde(VE).Bfass(SPB)
SizerJ l3' !3clf r 4 ?5 d,aneier
Ruud Lighting (800) 236-7000
*it-',a
MEMORAI{DIIM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
DEI .
Pam Brandmeyer4/Randy stoudet rh4l
e/ls/94
Ore House Awning Agreement
I have attached a sunmary of Lhe LranscripEion of Ehe May 17, L994
Town Council meeting. Merv Lapin made the motion to approve theawning as is, wiLh the condition that Ehe owner agree not tofurther enclose the deck. Jan Strauch reguested Merv to modify his
moLion t.o reflect the addition of flowers and liqhting on the deck.
Merv modified his moLion accordingly and it passed by a vote of 3to 1.
Thus, it is clear from the attached sr{nmary that the addition ofIight.s to brighten the appearance of the, deck were a condition ofallowing the awning Lo remain as originally construcled. r have
conveyed this to Larry Anderson, co-owner and manager of the Ore
House. He staEed EhaL he is diligrently pursuing adding boLh lights
and heaLers to the deck.
At your request, I will continue to work with Larry to implement,
the light.s to brighten the appearance of the deck. You may want Lo
strow the Lranscription summary to Tom Moorhead. A part of Merv's
motj-on contains a reference to modifyinq a lease aqreement Ehat
appears to be a different document than the awning agreement.
Town Gouncil Meeting Minutes, May 17, 1994
Orehouse Awninq
Merv Lapin made a motion:
1. To approve the awning as it is;
2. That the applicants have met the January 18, 1995 deadline and that this
deadline needs to be removed;
3. The conditions that we want on this. Tom, will you give me ihe verbiage for the
motion.
Tom Moorhead stated that as a term of the continued lease with the Town of Vail that there
will be a provision added to the lease stating that lhey will not further enclose the deck area,
and if they do, the lease will terminate by its terms. He added that they will need the Town's
approval prior to any assignment of the lease in the future.
Jim Shearer seconded this motion.
Jan Strauch wanted to ensure that the applicants go ahead with what they say they will do,
and that they are not approving the awning as is and the applicants will install flowers and
lighting to give the deck a more lively feel.
Kristan PriE stated that any outdoor lighting would need to go back before the Design Review
Board to ensure compliance with the Lighting Ordinance. She added that it was okay for the
Town Council to require the flowers and lighting.
Jan Strauch requested that Merv modify his motion to reflect the addition ol tlowers and
lighting to the Orehouse's deck,
Merv modilied his motion accordingly.
A vote of 3-1 approved this item with Paul Johnston opposing. lt should be noted that Peggy
Osterfoss was not in the room at the time of the vote for this item.
\^Jt-"^^.,- ]+ t-{^ffl- (-}.^.qr*-,' ,,
$rP 1 i$94
--:. iu!*| s.**e*.L* t.'t\ tdti " i\:i l I
ba-\'
l\, -:\-
as -'-t
Ltt-^,*-
,&. t=*-- c^-
r-ne-sa\r.r<-. - f-. \L
q qL\ -\,1!9'-+*sc\v.n\,;st' <!<yi- ,
L*_
..\r r-g 6\a- r
S-o--- S^"
.f \ .
c-<4v- s,, d.g-c -\r,./* I
r^e-lr,l. ., 0
-Ir
-
S'ar.^-e--Ja-a-T
-
-$^i*- \ r,,^"" -.-
-,L -\o""\-- - \^/aJ^.. -- {J^:o tr, t -. --\---lLb- - \.^, *l-- -I\*- - '^.=\-^r\o\'-*-- ** - -
-J- {L*." -
- _ cls- - _s--c/g*_ a.s
MUL.T.MOUNT SERIES
TOTAL AREA HEAT/SPOT HEAT/
SNOW & ICE CONTROL
FEATURES:
. 30", 60', or 90o symmet.ical and 30o offset, 30'or 60o
asymmetrical heat patterns, available as shown below
7-LTR lor proper selection
o 4 high temperalure lead wires tor single or two-stago wirlillT,. Can be wired lo single or three-phase systems tVJ. 3 lengths available lor a wide selection of wattagey
voltages. Dark brown baked enamel paint finish. Has knockouts tor ,{'conduit on both ends and centered on
top of wiring channel
sEP | ffii
HEAT FOR:
. Indoor and totally exposed
outdoor areas. TOTALAREA HEAT, SNOWICE
mry"Wmf; '[3."J'*#H{r;
Horizontarry '3'-l3i 339''
uo'
8'-10' (30'pattems-4utdoo4
MUL.T.MOUNT FIXTI URES HAVE THESE HEAT REFLECTOR PATTERNS AVAILABLE
30. SYTTEIRIG
-{|l.TH
30" ASYMiIETRIC OFFSET
-rutl-IH
60. sYitrErRrc 60'ASYTIIETRIG 90.sYI|I||ETR!C
^-.-90-TH
Refer lo specification manual 7SP-RHDP for detailed heat distribution patterns.
Fbdufa
i/bd€l
Sofbs
DimgnsiorE
LxWrD
Mar. UL
Wattage6
Availab{€
Per Fix.
UL Volt.
Availabl€
Psr Fix.
Max. CSA
Wattages
Available
Per Flx.
CSA Volt.
AvailaHe
Per Fix.
wt-
Each
2n 24: L
19W
7WD
Up to
3,200
WatE
120V
208V
210V
277V
up to
3,200
Watts
120V
a)8V
240V
277V
lo
lbs.
s12
93' L
1SW
7r'D
Up to
5,000
Watls
208V
210V
277V
480V
600v
up to
5,000
Watts
208V
240V
277V
480V
600v
24
lbs.
@
,16" L
15'WvtD
Up to
7,300
Watts
208V
240V
277V
480V
Up to
6,000
Watts
208V
240V
277V
,180V
ql
lbs.
Model Number Explanation:
To order, simply add suffix tor the desired pattern to the
model series required. For example, to order a 30' offs€t
in the 342 series: 342-431-TH
To select proper infrared elements, .eler to catalog sheet
number 7-LTR.
P/N 85-295: Metal Rod Support Bracket-{ust be used
with th6 342 and 462 s€ries-lF Metal Rod Elements
are used.
Re{er to Specilication Sheet 7SP-MTM lor wiring and installation instruclions.
*OPTIONAL RECESSING FRAME
FOR STANDARD MUL-T-MOUNT
' Used as an option with the Mul-T-Mount s€ries lo
recess the fixtures in a ceiling/canopy type
installalion
o Corrosion resistant aluminized sleel
' Brown baked-on enamel linish
Recessing
Frame
l|odel
RMF-222
RMF.342
RMF-062
cdllng cutout
Dinensiona
16%" x24k"
16%" x33|A"
16Y," x 46h"
FLng.
Dimenslons
18" x27%"
18" x 36%"
18" x 49Y."
'Recessing is not a UL listed application.
MUL.T-MOUNT HIGHLITE
' Fostoria's exclusive hinge
feature for easv installation
' Less expensive installation-
why pay two people when one
can install?
' Full length wireways permit
continuous rows
WPICALINFRARED
APPLICATIONS
Aircraft hangars
Enwways to buildings
Warehouse aisles
Ship building yards
Indoor swimming pools
Covered golf driving range
tees
High bay industrial areas
Open sports press boxes
Loading dock areas
SPECIFICATIONS
Housing is 24 ga. corrosion resistant steel, dark brown
baked-on paint finish. Reflectors are.040 gold anodized
aluminum. UL listed and CSA certified for indoor and
unprotected outdoor applications.
Top Chann€l Knockouts
"T" Tab
Hook the "T" tabs of the
Mul-T-Mount heater into
the slots of the wiring
channel cover. The unit will
hang freely by the
"T" tabs . . . leaving bolh
hands to wire lhe heater.
Any surlace or objecl ghould be al
least 24 inches away trom direcl
.adialion lrom the unit. Fo. surlace
mounlino, L,L r€qujres lixtures lo b6
3 inches from the ceillng, 24 inch€6
from a verlical sudace and sgoa-
raled by a mrnimun of 36 irrches.
s€RrEs 22 u2 462
nv'QT 45r
B 15'15'15'
L 2{3at-116'
All Mul-T-Mount Heaters are now available in 304 Series Stainless Steel, No. 3 finish (grain-line type), lor any outdoor and many
indoor applications. The entire housing is constructed of stainless steel. The hardware is stainless steel. The rellectors and end caps
are fabricaied from Fostoria's highest quality gold anodized aluminum. Stainless steel fixtures will not rust or corrode in damp or
chemicalladen atmospheres.
222 Series Heaters-.Stainless Steel
342 Series Heaters-.Stainless Steel
462 Series Heaters-Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel Mul-T-Mount
Heaters cost approximately
157o more than Standard Heaters
To order Stainless Steel Fixtures: Add "SS" sutlix (e.9. 342-A31-THSS) to model number.
Allow six weeks for delivery. No minimum quantity required.
OPTIONAL
MOUNTING BRACKETS
T
i
o
i!,.'It : 'l
#l '-r"
INFRA'RED *- si/ | i:;1 i;,
RnotANT, INC. /Uf'. jj ,, ,-. .:, -...
1478 w. Tufls Ave, . Englewood. CO 80ltO. (505) 76r-1444. r*,zAt-ti6i" t.'.lf'l^
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:
Ore House
232 Bridee St.
Box 996
Yail, CO 81658
DATE: August 3, l99lr
PHONE: l-303-476-5100
HOME: t-303-476-2713
P.O.f:
ATTENTION: Larry Anderson PROJECT:Patio Heating
LOCATION: Ore House. Vail
,NOi .F'R.ICE:
::::EA;::::
D€SCRTP..TIQ{TT
8 222-90-TH 208
or
2t+O
Fostoria Mul-T-Mount
Series Electric I nfrared
Heater, Fixture Oniy
2t2.OO 1,596.00
tb
lb
cF-1520H
or
cF*1624H
208
2t+O
1600 tlratt Quartz Lamp
lnfrared Heating Element
57.00 91 2.00
l6 3t-939 Ruby Red Vycor Sleeves 38.00 608.00
TOTAL FOR ABOVE s3,215.00
PIus Freight From Ohio
Approx. 180 lbs
SHIP TO:
Propane or Natural: Electric
Charge Freisht? Yes
Tax? Not Included
Payment Term: Net 30 Days ___Bega_y_lt-ilr!
**PRICES GOOD FOR 60 DAYS**
MODEL S25 & S34
GAS-FIRED INFRARED HEATER
For Indoor or Outdoor Operalion
D slrtt'I)a,k
I}IFRARED DYNA]UIICS
1040 W Seventeenth St. . Cosla Mesa, CA 92627. U.S.A.
Phone: (714) 548-2245
t",.,*'io{W}Sii' ? iSJi
)
)
The Sunpak patio heater provides radiant
warmth outdoors for you, your family and
friends.
Sunpak is A.G.A. design-certified as an unvented
infrared heater for outdoor or indoor installation.
All units are equipped with spark ignition and
10090 shutoff for safety, economy, and
conventence.
Sunpak's aluminized steel enclosure and alumi-
num face grille provides resistance to wind and
rain. A slim body and G30 degree angle mount-
ing option on most models, gives Sunpak the
versatility to fit easily into a wide variety of patio
situations.
IIVARNING: lmproper installation, adjust-
ment, alteration, service or maintenance
can cause injury or property damage.
Read the installation, operating and main-
tenance instructions thoroughly before
installing or servicing this equipment.
Retain these instructions lor future reference.
HEATER FEATURES:
Sfim Profife (8"H x 8"W x 47Vz"Ll
Decoratlve Safety Grille
Reduced Glearance Requiremenls
Angle Mounting - Zero to 30 Degrees
Rain Protected
Wind Resistanl
25,000 or 34,000 BTU/HR. Input
Natural or Propane Gas
Direct Spark lgnition
1000/o Safely Shutotf
,"t
--""
Form EB-BO?-E t/9J
Printed in U.S.A.
Installation, Operation and Maintenance Instructions for
Sunpak Infra-red Space Heatens...
ANS/ 283.6-1987
7. The heater must be installed in a location such
that it is readily accessible for servicing and
have no restriction of air flow to the air inlet of
the heater's casing.
iIOUNTING
Each heater must be installed such that the follow-
ing "Minimum Clearance to Combustibles" are
maintained.
WARNING: The clearances shown below are also
applicable to vehicles parked below heaters.
OPTIONAL MOUNTING KIT (#12006): Optional
Mounting Kit is available lrom your heater sup-
plier. Whether the mounting kit is used or not, min-
imum clearance from combustibles must be
observed as follows:
I]{STALLATIOI{
Prior to installing your Sunpak infrared space
heater, the following should be reviewed. Com-
pliance with the following should yield satislactory
heater operation and minimize installation costs.
1. Heaters to be installed in Aircraft hangars musl
be installed in accordance with American
National Standards for Aircraft Hangars,
ANSI/NFPA No. 409-1985.
Heaters to be installed in Public Garages must
be installed in accordance with NFPA No. 88A-
1985 Standards for Parking Structures.
The installation must conform with ANSI stan-
dard No. 2223.1-1984 entitled "National Fuel
Gas Code" an{ any applicable local codes.
Each heater must be electrically grounded in
accordance with the National Electrical Code,
ANSI/NFPA 7G1984 when an external electrical
source is utilized.
The gas inlet supply and normal operating
manifold pressure for each heater are as fol-
lows. For gas supply line pressures in excess of
/z psig, consult with your representative or the
factory.
Gas Inlet Presqrre Nat Gas LP Gas
Morrer p,il til' tff' ceirins tif* #i1; I
24', 12" g', 48"24" 17', 13" 48"24" 8', 14 4P/24', B', 18" 48"
s25
s34-s25
s34
25,000
34,000
25,000
34,000
HORIZ.
HORIZ.
30 DEG. MAX.
30 DEG. MAX,
4.
5.
Do not locate either the gas or electrical supply
line directly over the flue outlet of the heater.
Efectrical supply line shortage and/or control
overheating may occur.
Above clearances apply to models on either
natural or LP gas.*Model S25 for LP gas for use in horizontal posi-
tion only.
ELEGTRICAL
'f . Provide only a24 volt NEC Class 2 transformer
to the heater. A step down transformer
approved as having at least a 20VA rating must
be utilized for each connected heater.
2. Control wire used to electrically connect one or
more heaters together must have both adequate
capacity and insulation temperature ratings for
the total connected load. Use at least 18 ga.
wire up to 50 Ft. lrom heater to transformer or
wall switch. Use 16 ga. over 50 Ft. distance.
3. lf any of the original wire as supplied with the !
appliance must be replaced, it must be replaced
with wiring material having a temperature rating
of at least 105 degrees Centigrade.
Maximum Pressure
Minimum Pressure
Manitold Pressure
t/2 psig 1/z psig
6" W.C. 10" W.C.
5" W.C. 10" W.C.
MODEL S25 & S34
GAS.FIRED INFRARED HEATER
For Indoor or Outdoor OPeration
%" MOUNTING
It any ol lhe odginal wire ar :upplled
wilh lhe appllance mult be replaced, ll
musl be replaced wllh widng malerlal
having a t€mperatute rating of al leatt
105 degre$ Centrlgrade.
HEC Class 2
24v Transfomer-20V4
(Supplled by lnstalle4
\*?llr='*" {ll} -"
I-t/
Pad No, Model Descriplion Dlmenslons TyPe
12OO1-2 S2FNAT Sunpak 25.000 BTUH Heater 8"x8"x47tA" Natural Gas
12003-2 S25-LP Sunpak 25,000 BTUH Heater 8"x8"x47%" Propane Gas
12004-2 S3+LP Sunpak 34,000 BTUH Heater 8"x8"x471/2" tqp4lgsgx
30" TrP
MOUNT
GAS SERVICE
SHUTOFF VALVE
,h" GAS PIPE
{
CEILING
MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM COMBUSTIBLES T'UST BE MAINTAINED (SEE C{TATI ON OPPOS|IE PAgE)
30' MAXa/24:?' I'-t
HORIZONTAL
HORIZONTAL
MOUNT
...)N.(/GAS
INLET
SUNPAK will raise the comfort level $10' Fahrenheit
outdoors. The above coverage table was based on still
-,breeze
conditions. Under windy conditions, more heat
Jwill be required. For exampl€, a 5 mph breeze typically
will require twice as many heaters to achieve the same
heat comfort level. lt is recommended that a windswept
patio be designed with wind breaks in order to stabilize
the patio environment.
s-l
H = Height
S = Spread of Heat
ANGLE IIIOUNTING: Most models of the SUNPAK
heater may be angle-mounted to a rnaximum of 30o to
accommodate mounting the heaters around the edges
of the patio. Note that top clearance to combustibles
increases when heater is tipped lrom the horizontal'
LIGHTI]IG I}ISTRUCTIOilS
TO START HEATER:
1. Turn manual gas valve to "ON" position.
2. Turn electrical supply "ON."
TO SHUT DOWN:
1. Turn manual gas valve to "OFF" position.
2. Turn electrical supply "OFF."
CAUTION: lf burner lails to ignite, shut down
electrical power and wait five (5) minutes before
turning power "ON."
SERVTCTNG TNSTRUCTTOI{S
Turn off gas and electrical before attempting any
service to this appliance. Heater may be serviced
by opening door to control compartment. Rotate
round slotted disk on control door 90 degrees to
open. Top of heater may be removed for servicing
by removing six(6) screws holding top in place.
The top should be removed if the gas controls,
burner or burner orifice is to be reolaced.
1. REMOVALOFBURNER
a. Remove grille by removing two (2) screws at
one end of grille near control door. Pull
downward at the end and grille will be loose.
The far end of the grille is supported by two
(2) pins that enter two (2) holes in the reflec-
tor's far end.
b. Remove top of heater by removing six (6)
screws holding top in place.
c. The burner can be removed without removing
the pilot-electrode assembly. However,
extreme care should be taken to orevent the
burner from contacting the fragile electrode
when removing or reinstalling the burner. To
remove the pilot-electrode assembly, pull
loose the wire connected to the electrode-
Detach the pilot tubing. Remove the two
screws holding the pilot-electrode in place
d. Remove 7o" hex locknut located inside burner
orifice bracket holding piping assembly to
burner. A'1/s" 1z-poinl wrench will be handy to
loosen the %" locknut from the top of the
heater.
e. Remove two (2) screws holding the end of the
burner. Carefully slide burner down and out.
When reinstalling, be sure both ends of the
burner are beneath the reflector end flanges.
f. To reinstall burner, reverse procedure.
2. REMOVAL OF RAM.3 DIRECT SPARK
IGNITION CONTROL
a. Disconnect two 24 volt power leads.
b. Disconnect two valve leads.
c. Disconnect ignitor lead from control.
d. Disconnect green ground lead from casing.
e. Remove two (2) 8-32 x 1 % screws and nuts
holding control in place.
Screw heads are located on exterior front side
of heater above control compartment door.
f. lf insufficient removal clearance, loosen con-
trol assembly and move out of way.
TROUBLE SHOOTING
1. lf no spark from electrode; or if gas valve
doesn't work then:
a. Check power supply. Should have 24 volts
belween power wires. Use volt meter between
inlet 24 volts wire and ground terminal at
electrode plate to measure 24 volts.
b. Check continuity. Use ohmmeter. For exam-
ple, check resistance between valve wire and
ground. Should show almost no resistance
(0 ohms) through valve. lf high resistance,
check wire connectors.
c. Check spark gap. Should be7/64" (.109")
between electrode tip, and pilot hood. lf gap
is too large, spark will occur at wrong loca-
tion. lf gap is too small, spark may not be hot
enough to light pilot burner.
d. Be sure connectors are fully inserted into
ignition control (See Wiring Diagram on rat-
ing plate).
2. lf insufficient gas flow then:
a. Gas manual valve not full "ON." Turn valve
handle to full "ON" position.
b. Burner orifice plugged. Remove heater top.
remove burner orifice (use 1/2" hex wrench)
and thoroughly clean. Spiders often crawl
into orifice hole and make a web, blocking
the orifice.
I
a
GAS PIPI}IG
1. A minimum pipe size ot 1/2" is required for inlet
piping. A1/2" lever handled shut-off gas cock
should be installed within 6 feet of the appliance
for servicing the unit.
2. Check with local and state plumbing and heal-
ing codes regarding sizing of the gas lines.
3. All gas pipe connections to the heater(s) must
be sealed with a gas pipe compound resistant to
liquefied petroleum gases.
4. Installation of a drip leg in the gas supply line
going to each heaier is required to minimize the
possibility of any loose scale or dirt within the
gas supply line from entering the heater's con-
trol system.
5. When checking lor gas leaks, do not use an
open flame. Use a soap and water solution.
6. For gas supply line pressures in excess of %
psig, consult the factory or your local
representative.
. Installation of 7e" N.P.I plugged tapping,
accessible for test gage connections, is required
upstream of the gas supply connection to the
heater.
VElITILATION
1. lt is recommended that a minimum building
ventilation rate of four(4) CFM per 1000 BTUH
of installed heater input be provided. This rate
of ventilation may be obtained through either
gravity or mechanical ventilation of the building.
2. In conjunction with building ventilation system,
adequate fresh air into the building must be
provided through fresh air inlets andlor building
crackage.
3. lt is recommended that the local authorities be
contacted to assure the ventilating system and
heater installation are in compliance with any
applicable local and/or state codes.
HEATER OPERATION
Upon installation of the heater and completion of
the gas and electrical supply line to each heater,
follow the steps outlined on the "Lighting Instruc-
tion" plate located on the inside of the control
door.
ilIAINTEI{ANCE
In order to get the maximum performance from
your heater year atter year, we recommend the fol-
lowing be performed.
1. With an air hose regulated to 30 psig, blow off
any dust and dirt that has accumulated around
the burner and inside the control compartment
of the heater.
2. From the front of the heater, direct the air hose
from a distance of approximately twelve (12)
inches over the entire exposed area of each
burner's ceramics
3. Do not insert air hose into the inlet of the
burner.
4. Remove main burner orifice. clean and
re-install.
5. ll additional service to the heater is required,
contact the factory or your local representative.
NOTE: Protective eyeglasses must be worn when
any service or maintenance work is done to the
heater.
SEQUENCE OF OPERATION
Turn gas and power "ON." The pilot and burner
should light within 4 seconds. A heat sensor will
shut off the spark. lf the burner does not light
within 15 seconds, the heat sensor will shut "OFF'
the gas valve. To relight the pilot and burner, shut
"OFF" power. Wait 5 minutes. Turn power back
"oN."
T,INIMUII CLEARANCE
TO COITIBUSTIBLE IIATERIALS
USING OPTIONAL IIOUNTING KIT
P/N 12006
No. 525-12"
No. 53+17"
No. S2$9"
No. S3+13"
No. S2t12"
No. S3+17"
s25-14"
s34-18"
l'
__t_
!J r.ro. szs-rz"
47%" to Inside of Bracket Base
49%" to Outside of Bracket Base
%xl Channel Bar
o
a
o
o
Model No. S25 or S34 Heater (1) % Bolt
47?,',424'
Sunpak Palti Li.t
llem Parl No, DercriDtion
1 22OOZ A3sy, S Casing
2 32031 Ooor, S Caslng Reer
3'22003 Assy, S Retleclor
4' 7004r Fivet, ASD42-\ x ,1
5 22004-1 Aasy, S25 Burner
22004-2 Assy, S34 gurnet
6' 70037 Screw. 8-32 x h SPSS
7 70038 Nut. &32 Het Zn
8 9OO5l-2 Mc,dule. RAM-S 24 vo[6
I 70003 Scrsv/. &32 i( 2'. SPMS. A|t
l0 22006 Assy, CrrlDoor (€6s prato)
1t' 70021 Scfew. r8x
'i WHSM
12 22024 Assy, Pitot-Etect. 2SH76
13' 50011 Gasket, Pttot
80031 Tubing, Al 14 x 14" L
t5 AOO27 Elbow ti" Tubing l( % MPT
16 22Q21-1 Assy, V8lve-Beglla. S25 Nal
22021-2 Assy, Vatv€-Begltar S34 N.r
22021.3 4ry14!{ss!!r!rsfP
22021-4 Assy, Valv€-Fegular S34 LP
17 80032 LocRnut, %
Assy, S Casing Top1822m9
70026 Screw, {8 x tr SP-SS
2A 22010 Assy, GrillS
22 90056 Regu alor, 5" WC. Nat
90051 Rsguraror. r0" WC. LP
23 90054 Valv€. 25V-Fi91CG- 12
24 90@91 Assy. Vatv€-Nippte
?5 35ml-44 Orilice.2sM-Nat
35@1-3€ O.ilice,34M-Ml
35@r-53 Orilice.2SM-LP
3500150 Oralice,34M-LP
Opliond Moondng Kl
31 32043 Aar, ', r I Channel21-5/16"l
J2 7(l@1 Bort. rF16 x r' Squaro H€ad
33 70Ol! Wash€r, i! Lock
34 70059 Nul, trlS bl6ck ,nc
lj _1r04r __!'""-!g,s x""!:'
36 70061 Screw. ,;20 x ), black zinc
37 71023 Nut, 'r20
38 32042 Bracket. S Wall
39 70060 tsolt, ! x trd'L ag blk zinc
SEOUENCE OF OPERATIO]I
Turn gas and power "ON." The pilot and burner should light within 4 seconds. A heat sensor will shut
off the spark. lf the burner does not light within 15 seconds, the heat sensor will shut "OFF' the gas
valve. To relight the pilot and burner, shut "OFF" power. Wait 5 minutes. Turn power back "ON."
TROUBLE SHOOTI]IG
Problem Posslble Causes
No Spark to Pilot . Voltage under 24 volts
o Bad Fuse. fmproperspark gap (7/64" or .109"\. Loose ground wire. Broken Electrode
o Faulty Electronic module
Burner Won't Light o Air in gas line. Low gas pressure
o Bad Gas Valve. Blockage in gas line. Manual Gas Valve turned "OFF"
I nconsislent Operation Variable gas pressure
(improperly sized gas line)
Variable Voltage
Wind exceeding 15 mph
Tip angle exceeding 30"
Debris inside burner
Erratic winds
Limited Warranty and Service
SUNPAK@ Infrared Heaters carry a 9Gday commercial or one-year residential limited factory war-
ranty. All heaters are stamped with the date of manufacture. In most cases, your dealer or sales
representative will handle the warranty procedure for you. lf there is no sales representative available,
the heater may be returned to the lactory for repair. Warranty is limited to repair of heaters at the fac-
tory or replacement parts. Any work or repair of this heater must be performed by qualified service
personnel. Infrared Dynamics will not be liable for any other expense to the customer, except as
stated above. See Standard Warranty Form WT-112 for lull details.
o
a
a
a
a
mh$frfrffi6il
1040 West 17lh Street
Gosta Mesa, Californaa 92627
Tef ephone: (7141 548-?244-
IxrnnrEet-{.
CORPORATION
1770 Workman Street . Los Angeles, CA 90031
(2't3) 223-1041
APPLICATION INFORMATION
INFRATECH QUARTZ.TUBE
ELECTRIC INFRA-RED RADIANT HEATERS
FOR COMFORT HEATING "SPOTS' OR "SMALL AREAS''
The following inlormation is designed to help you apply and install INFRATECH QUARTZ TUBE ELECTRIc RADTANT HEATERS
in a variety of locations. INFRATECH heaters are one ol the most economical of all radiant heaters to buy, and can be some ofthe least costly to operate. They may also be the most economical to install, depending on the location oi electrical power
adequate to operate the heater(s) properly.
Swiveling wall or ceiling mounting
brackets (pair)
Steel all-weather housing
painted off white lnsulated housing
\
reL^T]lYl':t^., singte quartz rube operatesdepending on model
(max. 61-1i4") at approx' 1400' F'
Wall/ceiling brackels are furnished with all heaters.
Their use is optional. When used, they allow heater to
be fastened to wall or ceiling, and then tipped to 45"
from center of swivel.
/i./l,\l
,/' '450
|/ max. "up" --l
i
Heater can be tipped up to
approx. a 45 degree angle.
Heater can also be hung level in horizontal position using
chains or custom brackets. Heater must be dead level, but
can be rotated around its horizontal axis.
B" Wide
After heater has been installed, and set at desired angle, we suggest you drill through the flat mating
flanoes of the swivel brackets and insert a sheet metal screw to lock brackets in place. Do both ends.
Connect power with flexible conduit or appropriate cord
whenever possible to allow heater to be swiveled slightly.
Inlet hole into wiring box on top of heater is sized for standard
1/2" conduit weather tight fitting with locknut on inside of box.
Wiring box on top of heater has
a oasketed side access cover.
_--- Ground wire screw.
Two wires from element ends are
pulled into wiring box by factory.
NOTE: Heater must be installed with
quartz tube pertectly horizontal. For
maximum tube life use a level on body
of heater to find level position.
Top
Heater terminal on wire
ends (part of heateO
11/32' outside nut
Use thin 11/32" wrench like
found in auto ignition wrench
set on inside nut. Nuts
must be tioht. Quartz tubes consist
glass outer shell and
soiral wound coil
element inside.
t;/>-- -
TYPICAL 115V. WIRING
'I 15V. switch
TYPICAL 220V. WIRING
FOR TWO POLE SWITCH
Heating element
Heater
WIRING FOR OPTIONAL
220V. CONTROLLER
For 1'15V. pilol
light if used
Rear view of
controller for
max. 15 AMP
load only.
Heater
"TOP" marked on rear
of control must be in-
stalled in "up" position.
Below
f- r"o' *f
Always maintain the following
clearances from heater body to
combustible materials.....
TOP - 6" ENDS _ 18"
SIDES_ 1B' BELOW-72'
Unless heaters are installed over 12 ft. high,
it is generally recommended that radiant heaters be
mounted on an angle to assure that radiant warmth
is distributed from the side rather than straight
down on top of heads and shoulders of the people
being warmed.
LOCATION SUGGESTIONS
NOT RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED
30 to 60 degrees lrom horizontal
face down. Best angle approx.45"
Aim point should be at feet, or
on {loor behind worker or user.
I
When outdoors, hang
heaters under protective
roof, or weather cover.
l! f whenever possible. Even
lji-el7;/tnousl"' heater is all-weather Head too close, feet too far away.
V
construction, it will last
longer, and stay looking
good longer, if under a
weather cover protected
from rain and dew.
Warm floor re-
radiates heat. Warm
air rises from {loor.
Some heat reflects
{rom {loor.
Mounting a heater directly over a work table or above any above
ground obstruction will allow radiation to be blocked, and will
warm only the top of the obstruction. Better to move the heater
and beam it in under the table or obstruction to better warm the
floor.
Suspend heater to beam into heated area from the
"cold side" if practical. This helps compensate for
increased body heat losses on the cold side.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. INFRATECH RADIANT HEATERS are furnished with wall/ceiling mount swivel brackets. These brackets may be discarded
when the heater is hung lrom overhead with chains or other special bracketing.
2. See sales literature and price list for full listing of models, descriptions, amperages, and voltages.
3, Forthe best comfort heating, it is always best to beam radiant heat onto people from two sides rather than from just one side.
When spot heating, there are times when this is not praotical. The following chart is for warming from one side only.
4. lf insufficient overhead clearance exists to allow mounting at the recommended heights shown, heaters may be mounted
lower, and tipped up at any angle from horizontal face down. At lower mounting heights, the heater is closer to the area of
use, and could prove too warm for people forced to use the area close to the heater.
5. At times, especially when the mounting height must be quite low, smaller heaters, but more of them can help solve the
problem of overheating.
6. Heaters up to 15 amps can be used with the simple inexpensive controller described on the price sheet. This controller, which
is aclually a percentage timer, allows the heater to be turned down to the precise amount ol heat required at the time of use.
It is highly recommended that you stay with the heaters under 15 amps in rating, and use this controller in critical commercial
applications, such as in restaurants where patrons are forced to sit in one place in front of a heater. lt is always suggested
that you avail yourself of our field application assistance concerning heater location and sizing.
/tl
IxFRATEeF{
CORPORATION
Quartz Infrared
Heat Systems
for
Body Comfort
PATIOS RESTAURANTS
SPOT HEAT WHERE YOU WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT IT.
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
1770 Workman Street, Los Angeles, CA 90031-3394 . 1-(213) 223-1041 . 1'(800) 421'9455
IxFRATEeH-
CORPORATION
INFRARED RADIANT HEATEFIS
. Maximum Efficiency
. Heats Indoors and Outdoors. Provides Spot Heat to Exposed Areas
. Simple Low Cost Installation
. No Moving parts for Low Maintenance
. Anodized Reflector Resists Corrosion
FAST ECONOMilCAI- HEAT
. Units can be Regulated for
Desired Amount of Heat
. One Year Guarantee
. Free Factory Engineering Service
. UL LISTED
FOR BODY COMFORT
Celing Mount Wall Mount
Infratube All Weather Heaters
Model Length Watts Volts Amps BTU'S Cartons Ship. Wt.
w 512 191t2 500 120 4.2 1706w 7512 19,t2 750 120 6.3 2554w 7524 19,t2 750 240 3.1 2554w 1012 33 1000 120 8.3 3412w 1024 33 1000 240 4.2 3412w 1512 33 1500 120 12.5 5118w 1524 33 1500 240 6.3 5118w 2024 39 2000 240 8.3 6824w 2524 39 2500 240 10.4 8350w 3024 61V4 3000 240 12.5 12236w 4024 61'/4 4000 240 16.6 13648w 5024 61,t4 5000 240 20.8 17060
For 208 - 277 - 440 - 480 Volts Specify
o
15
15
1B
1B
23
23
23
INPUT REGULATOR
Voltage Weight
tNF t0 120 3 oz.
INF 20 240 3 oz.
IxTRATEcH
CORPORATION
RECOMMENDED MOUNTING HEIGHT
AND WATT DENSITY CHART
FOR BODY COMFORT
WATTS
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 4000
Fl8'
XT 10'
Ul.e'
ts
H 14'
E
| 16'
G
H$,
T
8x8
12
8x10
12.5
8x10
18
8x10
25
10x10-----.-9x12
nt.l
9x12
133
9x12
165
9x12n 12xl8
135-
12x18
185
12x18-E-
10x14 '10x14 10x14 10x14
17.
13x20
115
13x20
153
13x20
19
11x16
11.3
AREA'
WATTS PER
SQUARE FOOT
11x16
142
12x8
115
14x22
s7
14x22
12.9
14x22
16
15x24
83
15x24
111
15x24
13
16x26
72
16x26
96
16x26-E-
AVERAGE RECOMMENDED WATT DENSITIES PER SQ, FT. FOR BODY COMFORT
t
BY CLIMATE ZONE -t.X
ir.' \
.1r - \-
AREAS WITH NO OR POOR INSULATION-add 250lo to above
1770 Workman Street, Los Angeles, CA 90031-3394 . 1-(213122 1041 . 1-(800) 421-9455
IxFRATEeH
CORPORATION
CUSTOM QUARTZ ELEMENTS
Stock components for custom elements
In addition to stock elements, INFRATECH now stocks a large assortment ol resistance wire,
Quartz tubing and end terminators. Shown below are typical end terminations and ordering
reference sketch.
H
A
B
c
HEATED LENGTH
TUBE LENGTH
OVERALL LENGTH
LEAD
DIAMETER
SPECIFY
WATTS
VOLTS
VERTICAUHORIZONTA L
QUANTITY
E+_f--
1770 Workman Street,Los Angeles, CA 90031-3394 . 1-(2131223-1041 . 1-(800) 421-9455
Ceiling Mount
SIMPLE TO INSTALL... LOOKS
GREATANYWHERE.
Any qualified electrician or handy
home-owner can easily install the
INFRATECH INFRATUBE Quartz
Radiant Outdoor Heater. For best
results, a heater should be
mounted on a side wall (mounting
bracket included) 8'or more
above the floor and angled
towards the desired area. lf
mounted overhead, the
INFRATUBE heater should be at
a height of at least 10'. Models
W3024 and W4024, the 3000 and
4000 watt units must always be at
a height of 10' or more when
mounted overhead.
You choose the model that best
suits your needs for shirt sleeve
comfort. In warmer climates, a
1500 watt heater is ideal on a 65
degree day, 2000 watts on a 60
degree day and 2500 watts on a
55 degree evening. Cold climates
and unusually windy areas may
reouire two heaters to warm the
same space as they would in a
warmer climate. Or, a 3000 or
4000 watt model may be used in
cooler areas instead of two
heaters.
OPTIONAL LOW
COST HEAT
REGULATOR.
While any
INFRATUBE heater
WallMount
can be controlled by a simple
over-the-counter toggle switch or
circuit breaker which the home
owner has installed, the
INFRATECH optional Input
Regulator lets you adjust the heat
output and dial the comfort level
you desire. INFRATECH'S
Regulators are available {or either
120 or 24O volt heaters. Custom
control systems are available for
multi-heater installation.
FOR MORE INFORMATION or
technical assistance call the
INFRATECH CO RPORATION At
(213\ 223-1041.
outside california call
1-800-421-9455.
MODEL AREA HEATED LENGTH WATTS VOLTS AMPS
w1512
w1524
w2024
w3024
w4024
10'x 10'(1).
'10'x 10'(1).
10'x 10'(1).
10'x 15'(2).
10' x 15' (2).
ee,l
33"
39"
61 1t4"
61 1t4"
1500
1500
2000
3000
4000
120
240
240
240
240
12.5
o.J
8.3
12.5
16.6
Optional voltages available :
208V-277V-460V
(1). = mounted 8' above floor
(2). = mounted 10' or more above floor
IxpRATEcF{
-CORPORATION
',|770 Workman Street . Los Angeles, California 90031
(213) 223-1041 Outside California (800) 421-9455
DISTRIBUTED BY:
fu^d*hr^d"!^
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1994
12:OO P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
I. Lifthouse Lodge Site Visit (meet at TOV).
2. PresentationsRe:tg5Contracts/Duesi/Leases:
a. NWCCOG - Dues.
b. QQ- Dues.
c. VA Cloud Seeding.
d. Colorado West Mental Health Center.
3. Colorado Ski Museum Revienr of Lease/lntroduce Maftetirg plan.
4' Odinance No. 21, Series of 1994, an Ordinance re: Greenbelt and Natural Open Space/Discussion.
5. Review of Ore House Awning Conditions.
6. Intormation Update.
7. Council Reports.
E. Olher.
9. Executive Session - Legal Matters.
10. Adjoumment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIIIES BELOW:
(ALL TTUES ARE AppnOXmATE AND SUBJECT TO Clt tGE)
oooaaoo
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAF WORK SESSIONwfLL BE oN TUESDAY,9t1gt94, BEGINNTNG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couttql CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONWILL BE ON TUESDAY, g/20/94, BEGINNING AT 2:OO P.M. IN TO' COUI,ICIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGWILL BE ON TUESDAY,$Ia',P4, BEGINNING AT ?:30 P.M. Irr rOV COUNqL CHAMBERS.aaoooao
C:\ GENDA.IVS2
--f:,C Try
{a^- $sun"w^ff;'
Uht,^
ry#,,,lnr^ ffiW*,+,tu6r
l2:ffi P.M. l.
Jim Cumulte
l:00 P.M.
Sandy Blaha
1:15 P.M.
Kevin Lindahl
1:30 P.M.
Joe Macy
1:45 P.M.
Ron Blake
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1994
12:00 P.M. lN TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
Lifthouse Lodge site visit (rneel at Tov). The Town cdJncil wbhes to visit the
site of the PEc's recent approval of setback and site coverage variances and amai)r eliterior alleration in the conunercial core lt (ccll) zone district for the
Lifthouse Lodge, located at 5i5 East Lionshead circte, legally described as aponion of Lot 3, Block I, Vail Lionshead, lst Filing.
Action Reouested of council: conduct visit to the site ot the proposed remodel.
Backoround Rationale: On March 14, 1994, and Augusl B, 1994, work sessions
were held with the PEc to discuss the above referenced pruject. During both wofi
sessions the PEc requssted the applicant make ceilain modifications to the
building (roofing; ten€stration, etc.) and present the revised drawings at
subsequent meetings.
on August 22, 1994, the PEC approvect the prcposed variances and mai)r exlerior
alteration, with conditions. Please see attached memorandum ol lhe Town councit
tor a listing ot PEc conditions ot approval, as welt as staff's memorandum lo the
PEC.
Staff Recommendation: N/A.
Presentations Re 1995 Contracts/Duesi/Leases:
a. NWCCOG - Dues.
b. QQ- Dues.
c. VA Cloud Seeding.
Action Reouested of council: vail Associates wouH ask lhe Town of Vail to
contribute s23,469 ot 25% ol $93,9?0, which is the estirnated cost ol the program.
d. Golorado West Mental Health Center.
Ag{ion Requested of council Because staff has been atempting to consolidate
all contributions to colorado west Mental Health, stafl would like council to revie$,
lheir current level of contribution so all ol these can be brought together und€r one
contrt|ct.
gaqkoroqrd Rationale: Colorado West has been operating out of the Lionshead
Parking structure since 1993, at which time an agreemenl was reached to defer
lease payments unlll fumllure and fixtures for the renovated space were paid off.
Although it was our understanding the lessee wguld apprcach councit at t-hat time
to negotiate a lease fee, this has never been completed. In lact we have not had
a curent lease lor this space since 1988. standard contributbns over lhe years
have been as follows:
!9,ase hotd expense (estimated at gl,Znmo.) $14,,rc0 per year
L,llilities ($200ho/winter - $so/rnolsumrpo $ 2,000 ier year
Community EAP Contribution gt2"000 per year
lntemaUTOV EAp Cortributbn $ 3,600 per year
4 Blue pafiing passes (programmed for Lionshead
only - so not true value of $S?S - eslimated
at g475tea)
300 Coupons ($4.75lper coupon)
$ t,9ffi per year
$ t,125 per year
slaff Recommendation: consHer total package ol benefits and decide contribution
level.
2:45 P.M. 3. Colorado Ski Museum Review of Lease/lntroduce Markeling plan.
Joe Macy
Lucy Babcock
3:15 P.M. 4. Work session to discuss the contents of Ordinarrce No.2l, Series of 1g4,an
Tom Moorhead Ordinance amending Chapter 18.04, setting fofth definitions lor active outdoorRussell Forrest recreation, intepretive nature walks, nature preserves, passive ouldoor recreation,
Jim Curnutte private, public, quasi-publiq and changirE the seciion number ol recreation
structure; amending Chapter 1E.36 Public Use Dislrict; amerdiru Chapter 1g.38,
Greenbelt and Natural Open Space District; and creating Chaptei ra.Si, OutOooi
Recreation Districi; and setting fodh details in regard thereto.
Aqion Bequested of CouIpiL Council's discussion of the proposed tert charEes
to the above referenced Chapters of the Municipat Gode.
Bgqgqund Bationale: Onuay % and August 23, 1993, and February t4 and July
25, 1994, work sessions were held with the PEC to discuss tre pioposeO textchanges to the above referenced Chapter of the Municipal Code.
On August 22, tgg4, ths pEC approved the proposed lexl changes.
Staff Recommendation; N/A.
4:15 P.M. 5. Ore. House Awning AgreemenuLots D and E, Block 5, Vail Village lst Filing/232Randy Stouder Bridge Street.
Actiqn Requqstqd of Council: Discussion requested by Council. Larry Andersonhas been asked to attend this work sessbn to explain status of improvemefis
requested by Courrcil at their May t7,1994, meeting.
Bqchqtour-ld.Rationale: Several merbers of the Courrcil felt the awning made theoutdoor deck area appoar dad( and uninviting. Council requested fights andflowers to be added to improve the appeararrcC.
Stafl Recommendation: None.
4:30 P.M. 6. lnformation Update.
4;r0 P.M. i. Council Reports.
4:50 P.M. 8. Oher.
5:00 P.M. 9. Executive Session - Legal Matters.
5:15 P.M. 10. Adjournment.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(A|-L IIUES ARE AFPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHAI{GE)
oaooooa
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSTONWILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/13/94, BEGINNING AT 2OOP.M:'N iO' COUICIL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONWILL BE ON TUESDAY, g/2O94, BEGINNING AT 2:flI P.M. IN TO' COUNCIL CHAiIBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL BEGULAR EVENING MEETINGWILL BE ON TUESDAY,glg}E4, BEGTNNIHG AT 7:30 P.M. Ii{ TO\TCdUNCIL C,}IAIIBERS.
oooaooo
C:\AGENDA,WSE
COPYflLt
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 39
FAX 303-479-2452
August 29, 1994
Departne nt of Communiry Development
Mr. Larry Anderson, Owner/Manager
The Orehouse
F.O. Box 996
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Larry:
At their meeting on May 17, 1994, the Town Council reviewed the Orehouse awning
"tr""r"nt. fnle Councit reviewed the Design Guidelines that pertain to decks and patios in
th-e Village Core. Various Council members expressed concerns over the dark appearance
that the iwning created on the Orehouse deck. Discussion ensued between yourself and the
Council regarding ways to improve the situation. You stated that the Orehouse was
investigatin'g lighting options io create a brighter and more friendly atmosphere on the deck'
Specilii tighiin-g opl'ions were discussed including fixtures that would.wash the back wall wilh
tijnt. vou-atsJs[teO that the Ore House was looking at heaters to improve customer comfort
aid extend the useful period of the deck, and flower boxes to improve the aesthetics of the
deck. The Council urged you to proceed with all of these improvements as soon as possible.
The proposed improvements would require Design Review Board (DRB) review and approval'
To this end, we request that you submit a DRB application as soon as possible so that we can
begin to review these items and hopefully get the improvemenls in place before the winter
seison. The Town Council is interested in discussing this issue at their September 6th
afternoon worksession. We respectfully request that you andior John Beaupre be present for
this discussion. lf you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me in the
Community Development Department at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
fJt"tW-
Randy Slouder
Town Planner
'i'c: Lrtut Ut-'o o 1fr-[, \,/
,.69.b,f,e; )
' 6610 ttl,e. ) -
6tt4'*ffs11. aEnupntORE HOUSE. VAIL
SBD. VAIL. INC.
BOX 996
vAtL, coLoRADO 81657
303.476-51002
May'1,8,7994
/O,'u tr4:(PRESIDENT
LARRY ANDERSON
GENERAL MANAGER
Open letter to the Vail Town Council
Town of Vail Offices
75 South Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81557
f,Fc€ryEO JUt, 2 w
Dear Mayor and Council:
Thank you for the very straightforward consideration of Ore Flouse's awning
project. We are obviously very Fleased that it received your approval.
While the economic, business development and community 'focus' elements will
be self-evident, there was not unanimous agreement on the aesthetic
considerations. To this end, we will pay close attention to the overhead heating,
table'top lighting and decor as requested, and keep the setting and railing well
maintained and properly 'flowered' in the summer, and subject to some further
planning nicely decorated in the winter.
Though we cannot speak for the land owner(s), who at some future date may (or
may not) wish to build out to their property line, as long as we are tenants and
operate the 232 Bridge Street premises, we do and will regard the space under the
awning as an outside deck, covered, but not (to be) enclosed.
In addition to the deck's obvious summer, daytime operation, and to respond
specifically to councilmens' Stauch and Shearer's comments, we would very much
like to establish this deck's function as Vail's first (only?) heated and covered
outdoor space that can operate when possible during the winter and on cooler,
surnmer evenings as well. As sucll it will/would be a very nice addition to the Old
Town's core.
Thanks again for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Is/pjj
"f
Owner & Manager
:. DUU{GO. COIOR OO
3 SUi v^ufY. oN $E raaLr- 3un val.r.EY, roao
\?- B\e
o
1:00 P.M. l.
Randy Stouder
Lary Anderson
1:50 P.M. 3.
Pam Brandmeyer
2:00 P.M. 4.
Andy Knudtsen
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 17,1994
1:00 P.M.lN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
Site Visit: Ore House awning,232 Bridge StreeVLots C and D, Block 5, Vail Village,
lsl Filing.
Action Requested of Council: Examine the current awning.
Backoround Rationale: The DRB approval was temporary and the awning
agBement allows Council lo afiecl change or removal il good reason for such
exists.
Stalf Recommendation: See the attached memorandum for guidance from Vail
Interview the three Licensing Authority.
Aqlion Requested of Council: Review written applications from Don White, Amy
Fritz, and Elizabeth Pickett. A ballot vote wilt be taken for two ol lhe threi
candidates at the Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Courrcil Evening Meeting.
Backoround Rationale: Terms lor Don White and Milzi Gimenez on the Local
Licensing Aulhority expire June t, 1994. Don White is re-applying.
Discussion Re: Ordinance No.5, Series ol tgg4, prior to second reading al the
Tuesday, May 17, 1994, Vail Town Councit Evenirg Meeting, an ordinance
rezoning a tract l'om Primarylsecondary Residentiat, section 18.13 to Low Density
Multi-Family Residential, section lg.16 generally tocated at 2950 Kinnickinnick
Road more specifically describecl as:
A palcel of land in the southwsgt Quarbr ot sedion 14 Township 5 sorfr, Range 8l west of the 6th
Principal Meridian, more par cularly described as follals:
Eeginning at a point whenca a braas cap set for a witless oorner for he West Quartsr ot said Sgction
14, bears (North 29 degress 2t minubs 5t s€cords Wsst, 1fl3.08 bet D€ed) (Norfi 43 D€grses ls
minul€G 02 seconds west,915.96 feet irleasured); Thenc€ North 74 degrees 05 minutes ts ieconds
East, 10.76 feeg Thence 163.62 l6et along the arc of a curva b t'€ dghi lAfiicfr ate subtends a chord
b€aring Nonh 88 degr€€s 12 minubs 30 seconds Eas! 18r.?6 teet; Thence soufi 77 degr€es 40
manutes 21 seconds Easr, 62J7 t@\, Then€ 147.43 f€et along the arc of a curue to the left thidr arc
subbnds a chord bearing Nor$ 86 degrees 36 minute€ lz seconds EaBt 145.60 feet Thence Norfr
70 degrees 52 minuFs 55 seconds Eas! rt06.55 feet; Th€nce 54.10 bet abng the arc of a curve b the
right which arc eubtends a chod bearing souh 4? dogGes 20 minutes 3? seconds East, rg.20 te€t:
Thence Sqnh 14 oegFs€s 25 m|nub8 i0 seconds l,Vest, ll0.5l f€€t Th€n€ South 6g d€gr€€s lg
minuteB 91 s€conds west,320.m f€et; Thenc€ Norh 19 degrees 07 minubs 05 soconds wssl 50.@
feet; Thenoe south 77 degree6 48 minubs 4l seconds w€st, ldolg foet Thsnce souh lo degE€s 53
minut66 33 seconds w€st,5.48 t€et; Theno€ Norfi t7 degreeB 40 minubs 06 s€oonds west, ggz.zz
fu€t Th€n@ (Norh lt d€gress 52 minubs 13 s€conds East, 130.00 fusl Deed) Norfi 1l degrB€c 55
minutes 3l seoonds East, 129.75 fs€t iteasurcd) b the polNT oF BEGINN|NG.
Bearing from G.Lo. record tor south hall of s€ction line b€twsen s€ctions 14-15. (G.L.o. record sourh0l dsgrs€6 3O.2 minubs EasD (South Ol d€grees 3t minurc 32 socords East Mea6ur€dl
Applicant: Juanita l. Pedotto represented by Greg Amsden.
l:20 P.M. 2. Discussion re: Ore House anvning.
Randy Stouder
Larry Anderson
Aclion Requested ol Council: Discuss awning agreement with Ore House owner
to determine if changes are necessary.
2:30 P.M. 5.
Bob McLaurin
4:15 P.M.
Bob McLaurin
4:30 P.M. 7.
Backoround Ratbnale: On April 11, 194, the PEC votd 4-{-l (with Greg
Amsden abstaining) recommendirq approval of the requested rezoning and minor
subdivision. There are several letters from neighboG which are irrcluded in the
packet. During Courrcil Work Sessbn on April lz, lg9/', Council called up the
minor subdivision requesl. Courrcil approved lhe minor subdivision on May 3,
1994, wilh a 4-3 vote and made it contingent upon apprcval of the rezoning.
On May 3, 1994, Council approved the rBzonirE on first reading with a 5-2 vote.
In addition to the ten conditions ol approval lisled in the PEC memo, Council
added four more conditions to the plal, including:
l. No 250 square foot addilions shall be allowed for any drelling unil on this
parcel.
2. A homeowner's association shall be established prior lo lhe issuance ol
a TCO to insure mainlenance of the @mmon area.3. The deed restrictions lor the three employee housing units shall inchrde
language requiring the units to be renled, and requires the renlal rate be
comparable to rnaftet rates.4. The maximum GRFA allowed on this sit€ shall be 25,900 square feet.
Slafl has attached a list of all the conditions whbh will be placed on the plat.
lssues such as the construction of the sicleuralk and construcition ol the employee
housing units are identilied in that list.
Stafi Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 5, Seriee
of 1994, on second reading al the Tuesday, May 17, 194, Vail Town Council
Evening Meeting. No action needs to be taken on the subdivision as that was
approved by Gouncil on May 3, 1994.
Town Manage/s Repofl:a) Work Program for Employee Housirg. (45 mins.)b) Summary of Comrn:nity Developmenl Department Project Priorities. (3O
mins.)c) Cost ot Planner. (30 mins.)
Action Reauested of Council: Review errclosed merKrs.
Review of Resolution No. 13, Series ol 1994, a resolution ratifying and adopting the
Mission, Vision, Goals and Objectives for lhe Town of Vail, Golorado tot 1994t95.
Action Reouested of Council: Review Resolution No. 13, Series of lg4, in
preparation for reading and vote at the Tuesday, May 17, 1994,Vail To#n Courrcil
Evening Meeting.
Inlormation Update.
Council Reports.
Other.
Executive Session: Legal Matters.
Adiournment.
8.
9.
10.
11.
r 0D irnuraromud d^h Lur,r,r\r} \0&d-fo L Wrt"ur,g^"{ r]*di,tl
^tL de"L f\qs, windaus,
fl.\o.a di
, u;o'r,! rnnmdrru{ 5 tL ja4oa -+ 2Ow. rro rf*.tu(ff tU du/vro4 - $*ue- k^!- 6ost^J, t6t
r fi,,'ou.[pyg \qt
, ,M*d DY3 &ie\) I,i!o, p^r0,
rno\an \fur,J J,.
,Sqz.dnd, \,rr^:.. u.
-"F
-3- f?P^nU-2P- (1d'
#K,' ;ii h,*
fr-at- l- ili uu--'r lll
t7 aprlrgaiufv.ip is
zr M,n' \fir &rdCI* $oi J rrnaBd
lV A- , --I.r{ht
) Jrenr^ d( -[AJ PW PrTrr;fDJ 1r' g^dotL daLLar€A- ,f -ttcrl
to *U ,gla"u r"u'\\ *rnri1fr
t\ t''1rt'y r,.', &r!.- baJcurc"t\- - \U\"lV ^u".L' {U}u\o!0!-r^rg. hed\
@0
oo
.- (.ort\ 4r4u%- f&te,tf , pdt4hlr,4€r* o{,nnr-
r,,t*a{l0'E , bV /ulunaq-ilj0s{r^ffi* I i" rAJ'C{y ,0,!"4
t;^-, -*|'N
^df d i"c'un"az-T '/?^'"'---r^
.,".' W 7f'(/^rr^ 1 -/ 1f-*. Aunn '' - l*#e p [,.nfu; .J />ry *;,(4n^?+
/1/61/
-"S,[^- @xS ,t"< 4h;W C"rffr-r"e4f .
/nf'/** )s o 6=^-Z ft, p-fr^?%' /'-- f'' / { '
r - /'et rr {t,,* d't/y,4,
'-,0^- 4fuq11++ %-,
-,{J,^- &rr" 6"{r,h nnLl,,, _ t-rrrdl -{r,rqs Au Vab(e,s
iri,tu-ltwz'^ fusd,-l^, tu"{us- @0. probehT
i;
?
$\^, rt^o g^nA>n^* &p@r8 S-R/l^?* g,f h ,^P\Y.ft
f^eN- pail+&q ^fir" rt (ra 7
+K- ly ,M dfr+a.,^
ilt'dil/. *"ll ,*tl {n ^qtyl {o 2'1o5")tr""
{a*. b^bAb- btll- "{ lo4,-uMic"(
*tuI&NJ
fva&,ts
- tt^Pkfrtnrlnd, 1"'tl ut'
- g)si{+,/e oiw all
ot
To^,,/4.- b'rwtL o'c',./a fuefl JJ l*iu*-u{
O &#cA
Wry
{t*' lna@t t(4/!f
-/ owhsrs fud , ,- ftnf"d;n'iTrj'fo[ ^J
{l'- - Aa 6w:,n'il.,(/flrrph*) , *
^ A#<^ ,,9 ,./a^,'-J U"M1
- ffi4 mAtu onrka4* ,10"fun ({o^, ,,,^I4rW4/
*'pd^Y7 htr"lf I
-'/a1,'sfr)&\-
lrte on^- d{"o- ud,ftdznt
C1^4^'fr/, ffit'f*g wJ,5Ury"
Hf^f'M'&+u^'1*
6*',n'X^o ^';D
€
l,a,U'1, @f aN^ Nr4 fuZ "6"" '".Ary
Wr
t-TBAI{(
OF VAIL 17 VA|L ROAD VA|L, COLOHADO 81657 303-476-5686
l{ay t7 , 1994
The Honorable Margaret Osterfoss
Mayor of Vail-
75 South Frontage Road
Vail , Colorado 81657
Dear Peggy:
Thank you for taking the time to discuss the Ore House awning situation
yes cerday .
To reiterate our conversation, this auning covers approximately 50
seats, This additional seating capacity not only increased the Ore
House revenues by 15% over 1993 (based on my review of the most current
financial statement), but I believe also visibly enhanced the activity
in the heart of Vail Village.
There's no question that anyone walking down Bridge SLreet wancs to feel
the pulse of Vail, its character and traditions. .and you can only
feel something like that when you actually see people enj oying
thenselves.
I believe che patio dining experience in Vail is a valuable asset to our
village, and we should do all that we can to encourage it. The Ore
House has made a significant investment in this awning, attenpting to
provide this experience. I hope you and the council will also encourage
this experience by providing the Ore House with your final approval .
r{RR/
Executive Vice Pres ident
REAL ESTATE BROKERS AND CONSULTANTS
23O BRIDGE STREET
VAIL, COLORADO 81667
May 16, L994
Larry Anderson
The Ore House Restaurant232 Bridge StreetVail , CO 8L65
Dear .Larry:
Although f am no longer on the Design Review Board,express ny continued support of your awning.
TELEPHONE
(3031 476-ZtZ'l
TELETAX
(303) 476-2658
I wish to
A nain concern during our review last year was the snow mett off ofttre awning and the effect it would havt on Bridge street. r watchedthis situation during the winter and it was not, even an issue.
The other nain aspect of your approval was the change of the streetscape and a perceived 'Ddrrowingrr of Bridge street. Again, theawning has proven to be a positive- addition in that it haj enhancedthe activity and lent more vitality to this area of Town.
r was preased to rearn that your improvement to Bridge street alsoltas an economic success for you ind added to Townrs sares taxrevenue.
With sincere regards,
Design Review Board
E(cluiivc Alliliate
SCITHEBYS
IMERNANONAL REAITY
ceorge S.Past chai
IJ\COITOI TTID
REAL ESTATE AROKERS AND CONSULTANTS
23O BRIDGE STREET
vAlL, coLoRADO 81657
Apil22,7994
Mayor Peggr Osterfoss
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Peggr:
I am writing regarding the Ore House awning which was installcd last year. Both Beth and
I fecl the awning, as installcd, is fine and is not a dctrimcnt. We would encourage the
council to allow the awning to remain.
As you might recall we expressed concerns at the original hearings but fecl, as installed, it
is fine.
Erchoiw Alliliattw
IN1ERNITTIONAL REAL:IY
TELEPHONE
(3O3) 476-2421
I'ELEF-AX
(303) 476-2651r
Best regards,
&4@, fl,;. *:,ir,ir'
&wn$ n; re
&3 B- 1,2.?F,f.'a
{+aE t.'g,.:;"tts'
e: .6 ffi { +:.fti tir- s, n=g'.
ggYl'*.qr "f.*tt irl'
*:olff$.**
fUa -+rt^alnp{ c tt:roA.
Lwbr4oo.lc" rlr^;g;;44 . F*^ 0r lt (c''t'+)
4ila- '
tbttnlu^{raq h^^ aiealul?
g}'0r Sf=..F9:'r.;1, s,:' StS:l
d.ff. S*F.q# ei.
de, fri.€:.. Fi:..r"el;l
"
; .1,, "?: ;.,S&t ,9. & : ,'.," s: .
?*rhl'*olnft+ a lr:tad
Laol4tcft I-r^ &ou.-6rtvDu;
#a 6. ffiuse#.
&ue*'e* &&.a*ef.
*3 tlewte ArffiY
f,nnE8.s$q}
$6 e ##,ffitr*tlse
6rts*v (naro)
ft"h+al'^ slnh+ c tt:tbA
f.$^i o*ia 4:,*+4. f ,* o, Ir k*n
e irr-
;tt"r)".arAvrth
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Town Council
Gommuni$ Development Department
May 17, 1994
Ore House awning agreement
I. BACKGROUND
On June 3, 1992, the Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the Ore House application to
install a permanent awning across the front of the restaurant. The awning would be
approximately 12 feet deep and 55 feet long along the west side of the Glock Tower Building
adjacent lo Bridge Street. The DRB members voted to approve the Ore House awning
application by a 3-2 margin. The Town Council called this item up at the June 16, 1992 Town
Council meeting. Shelly Mello reviewed the opinions of the various DRB members and why
they voted for or against the application. Sherry Donrard voted for the application stating that
the awning would extend the use of the deck and add vitality to the area. Ned Gwathmey and
Gena Whitten opposed the awning stating that it would enclose and narow Bridge Street to
an unacceptable level and would not comply with several Vail Village Design Considerations.
Following the review of DRB opinions, Peggy Osterfoss stated that she also felt that several
Design Guidelines had not been met, specifically, there was not a varied height, there was no
inegular street edge, and the sun/shade issue on the deck had not bben adequately
addressed. After some discussion, Merv Lapin moved to uphold the DRB decision. Bob
Buckley seconded the motion. A vole was taken and fie motion was defeated 3-4 with Jim
Gibson, Jim Shearer, Tom Steinberg and Peggy Ost€rfoss ln opposition. Following further
discussion, Merv Lapin moved to modify the DRB's approval lo a one year temporary approval
with the contingency that Larry Eskwith dratt a written agreement between the applicant and
he Town establishing temporary approval and allowing the Town to request the removal or
modification of the awning at the end of one year. A removal or modification request would
need to be based on the determination that th6 Installation did nol meet the Vail village
Design Considerations. Bob Buckley seconded the motion, a vote was taken, and the motion
passed 4-3 with Jim Shearer, Tom Steinberg and Peggy Osterfoss opposed. A copy of the
minutes are attach€d.
On March 8, 1994, at Council's request, staff reviewed the awning agreement and brought the
findings to lhe Town Council. Staff's memo stated that the Town Council had until January
18, 1995 to review and require modilications or removal of the awning. A copy of the March
8, 1994 memo is attached.
il. vAtL y|LLAGE pEStGN CONSIDERATIONS
Attached to this memorandum are the pertinent seclions of the Vail Village Design
Considerations. These considerations should be used to guide any decision regarding a
modification or removal request for the Ore House awning. The major points to consider are
as follows:
%street_Elglosut9. - An external enclosure is most comfortable when its walls are
virtually half as high as the width ol the space enclosed. lf the ratio falls to a quarter
or less, the space seems unenclosed. lf the height is greater than the width, it comes
to resemble a canyon. When exceptions to the general height criteria occur, special
design consideration should be given to creating well defined ground floor pedestrian
emphasis to overcome scale problems. Canopies, awnings, and building extensions
can all create a pedestrian focus and divert attention from the buildings'
.Slfeet eSre - Buildings in the Village Core should form a strong but inegular edge to
the street. Plazas, patios and green areas are important focal points for gathering,
resting and orienting and should be distributed throughout the Village with
consideration to spacing, sun access, opportunities for views, and pedestrian activity.
.!:!9@9L@Lrei!!S, - When evaluating a development proposal, priority should be
given to an analysis ol the impact of the proiect on views. Vie\ws that should be
preserved originate from other major pedestrian areas or public spaces.
.Sun/ShadC - On all but the warmest summer days, shade can easily lower
temperatures below comfortable levels and thereby negatively impact use of those
areas. All new or expanded buildings should not substantially increase the spring and
fall shadow pattern on adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
.Oecfs anclEatios - Decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bring people
to the streets. A review of successful decks and patios in Vail reveal the tollowing
common characteristics:
lF.Djrect sunJght from 11:' .Elevated feet to give views into pedestrian area.
.Physical separation from pedeslrian walk.
.Overhang gives pedestrian scale/shelter.
Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to sun, wind,
views and pedestrian activity."
.Accent Elemenlg - The life, and festive quality ol the Village is given by judicious use
of accent elements which give color, movement and contrast to the Village. Colorful
accent elements consistent with existing character are encouraged, such as awning
and canopies.
evandj^m€mosbfe hous.tc
II. VAIL VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Attached to this memorandum are the pertinent sections ol the Vail Village Design
Gonsiderations. These considerations should be used to guide any decision regarding a
modification or removal request for the Ore House awning. The major points to consider are
as follows:
.,.@.Anexterna|enc|osureismostcomfortab|ewhenitswa||sare
virtually half as high as the width of the space enclosed. lf the ratio falls to a quarter
or less, the space seems unenclosed. lf the height is greater than the width, it comes
to resemble a canyon. When exceptions to the general height criteria occur, special
design consideration should be given to creating well delined ground floor pedestrian . .ta,t tt**
emphasis to overcome scale problems. Canopies, awnings, and building extensions yi.' 'i:; A
can all create a pedestrian focus and divert attention tronitne buildings. frheh lt'ww
1 \R fl a t^*1'*
york.'",: ;W.,",-T:[?,."l."1,|;JJ13fl""'"ff;l',:li:?ffi,T:Il%i,l:ff'#i{""',1ff '6 *'"'*n,'F
t,f 3f.:,iII-.:. resting and orienting and should be distributed throughout the Village with c4E*tY*"?;iliJel;iloili;;;.d, irn "*".r, opportunities rorviews, and pedestrian activity.
,7,oo^|ntu.,rd, "lnicl b)^rA .Vjet{S_atEE99A!_PointC - When evaluating a development proposal, priority should befl^ff"''C C/, gi"enE-an analysis of the impact of the pioject on viers. Views that should be
i;i[ tt $g{:'. pr"r"red originate from other major pedestrian areas or public spaces.
, .SunlSnaclg - On all but the warmest summer days, shade can easily lower
, .*)t{ temperalures below comfortable levels and thereby negatively impact use of those
i\'s j .1| ln 0? areas. All new or expanded buildings should not substantially increase the spring and
{yr {,Y *" f"ll shadow pattern on adjacent prolerties or the public right-of-way.
',tte{t
.Oec,Xs ald- patiSC - Decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bring people
to the streets. A review of successful decks and patios in Vail reveal the following
common characteristics:
.Direct sunlight from 1 1 :00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. t'J bc:' lc a-n"*'-1 S'
.Efevated leet to give views into pedestrian area. {eJ
.Physical separation from pedestrian walk. .val
.Overhang gives pedestrian scale/shelter. at - L;/ b; ,r o.1," " 44h,*1
Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to sun, wind,
views and pedestrian activity..
c:Vandyvnsmos\orehous.tc
oo
& fW Dburs")n4'*^u'Jn;
7* ^/.^hs-
d tuffirl/?t v{ /o-.; f,"^24"^( Av6<,r,'t-"'<r
nd{ w*- -?@l^Mo.-1 W # >rvh"&)/p&)or. W.r,'r'\/Md hry( r;'"* i fM
n ilurr {A' ltn,xbt^ ee fiP' ry"q*/
116^ '{-,115 €'"^t^< fuY49*W
f,, fr^t- f,,r! fr5r"4" ;,*'? o.Jufl. n 44 'l'.'
n#W*Y; t;'4! af /ryryfur,krr'nnrffi
$"rurh,rry fr /-Ff.4 "4 t'?'fufr"^-
U/44 &*{" 7r-' ai"t " 4^ fr""
r*/ d ;i- -""{* i ry f,"W,fffi ^rynN4"& fl,rt /k''* e'^*hanq '
IiE,!,.t: i,APER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Town Council
Community Development Department
May 17, 1994
Ore House awning agreement
I. BACKGROUND
On June 3, 1992, the Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the Ore House application to
install a permanent awning across the front of the restaurant, The awning would be
approximately 12 feet deep and 55 feet long along the west side of the Clock Tower BuiHing
adjacent to Bridge Street. The DRB members voted to approve the Ore House awning
application by a 3-2 margin. The Town Council called this item up at the June 16, 1992 Town
Council meeting. Shelly Mello reviewed the opinions of the various DRB members and why
they voted for or against the application. Sherry Dorward voted for the application stating that
fre awning would extend the use of the deck and add vitalig to the area. Ned Gwathmey and
Gena Whitten opposed the awning stating that it would enclose and narow Bridge Street to
an unacceptable level and would not comply with several Vail Village Design Considerations.
Following the review of DRB opinions, Peggy Osterfoss stated that she also felt that several
Design Guidelines had not been met, specifically, there was not a varied height, there was no
irregular street edge, and the sun/shade issue on the deck had not been adequately
addressed. After some discussion, Merv Lapin moved to uphold the DRB decision. Bob
Buckley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion was deleated 3-4 with Jim
Gibson, Jim Shearer, Tom Steinberg and Peggy Osterfoss in opposition. Following further
discussion, Merv Lapin moved to modify the DRB's approval to a one year temporary approval
with the contingency that Larry Eskwith draft a written agreement between the applicant and
the Town establishing temporary approval and allowing the Town to request the removal 0r
modification of the awning at the end of one year. A removal or modification request would
need to be based on the determination that the installation did not meet the Vail Village
Design Considerations. Bob Buckley seconded the motion, a vote was taken, and the motion
passed 4-3 with Jim Shearer, Tom Steinberg and Peggy Osterfoss opposed. A copy of the
minutes are attached.
On March 8, 1994, at Council's request, staff reviewed the awning agreement and brought the
findings to the Town Council. Staff's memo stated that the Town Council had until January
18, 1995 to review and require modifications or removal of the awning. A copy of the March
8. 1994 memo is attached.
II. VAIL VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Attached to this memorandum are the pertinent sections of the Vail Village Design
Considerations. These considerations should be used to guide any decision regarding a
modification or removal request for the Ore House awning. The major points to consider are
as follows:
".&g!_fu!@1g - An external enclosure is most comfortable when its walls are
virtually half as high as the width of the space enclosed. lf the ratio falls to a quarter
or less, the space seems unenclosed. lf the height is greater than the width, it comes
to resemble a canyon. When exceptions to the general height criteria occur, special
design consideration should be given to creating well defined ground lloor pedestrian
emphasis to overcome scale problems. Canopies, awnings, and building extensions
can all create a pedestrian focus and divert attention from the buildings.
.Street Ale - Buildings in the Village Core should form a strong but irregular edge to
the street. Plazas, patios and green areas are important focal points for gathering,
resting and orienting and should be distributed throughout the Village with
consideration to spacing, sun access, opportunities for views, and pedestrian activity.
.@L&idg-Whenevaluatingadeve|opmentproposa|'priorityshou|dbe
given to an analysis of the impact of the project on views. Views that should be
preserved originate from other major pedestrian areas or public spaces.
.Sun/Shade - On all but the warmest summer days, shade can easily lower
temperatures below comfortable levels and thereby negatively impact use of those
areas. All new or expanded buildings should not substantially increase the spring and
fall shadow pattern on adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
.OecfC_and Patios - Decks and patios, when properly designed and sited, bring people
to the streets. A review of successful decks and patios in Vail reveal the following
common characteristics:
.Direct sunlight from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
.Elevated feet to give views into pedestrian area.
.Physical separation from pedestrian walk.
.Overhang gives pedestrian scale/sheller.
Decks and patios should be sited and designed with due consideration to sun, wind,
views and pedestrian activity."
.Accent Elements - The life, and festive quality of the Village is given by judicious use
of accent elements which give color, movement and contrast to the Village. Colorful
a@ent elements consistent with existing characler are encouraged, such as awning
and canopies.
cvand^rn€mos\orehous,tc
MINUTES
VAIL TCIWN COUNCIL MEETiNG
JUNE 16,1992
7:30 P.M.
:_:S:g :l*:.u,*,1111 .CoTld..y.r" herd on r\resday, June 16, Lggl, at?:80 p.m., in theCouncil Chanbers of the Vail Municipal Building.
MEMBERS PRESENT:Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor
Menr lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
Bob Buckley
Jim Gibson
Rob LeVine
Jim Shearer
Tom Steinberg
noDe
Ron Phiilips, Towu IVlarrager
Larry Eskwith, Towa Attorney
!-an pryod:neyer, Assistant to the Towa Maaager
Martha Raecker, Town Clerk
ME1VIBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIAI,S PRESENT:
Item twelve- 01 thg -qeelda was a call up by Towu Corncil of the Design Review Board (DRB) {ecisioa
fPlrwing the installation of ga awning located on the west side of tbe Clock Tower Buildiag (Gorzuch
byrllin8) for the Ore House Restauraa! 232 Bridge Stree! I-t A, Block 5, Vail Village flrst f,ilhg.
Shelly Mello gave a brief oven'iew of the project, statiag the owners of the Ore House Reltar:raat made
a request to locate a greeB awaing approximately 1? b depth with a combined leagth of 55'along tbe
west side of the Clock Tower Buildi:rg adjaceut to Bridge Street. The Design Review Boaril voed 3-2
to approvg the reguesl with Sherry Dorward citing in her motion the installition would extend the use
of the deck and add vitality to the area. tr1"4 gsfu+hrney and Geua Wbitten of the DRB opposed the
Totigl, fiading that although the request did conform with a nunber of the Vail Vilb-de Desig:n
Consideratioas, it would enclose and narow Bridge Street to an unacceptable level ald woulcl aot cpmply
witb several of ttre Vail Village Design Considerations. Ore House owners Larry Aaderson ala JoUn
Beaupre presented their project and stated they had full s;upport from David Gorsuch, the buildingofilen Rod Slifer, owner of the adjacent building, stated he was concerned with the permanency of theyear-muad awaing and the protrusion of the building into the street. Peggy Osterfoss said ieveral
Desip Guidelines had not been met, specifically, there was no varied heigbi, no irregular street edge,
aad the suq and shade issue on the deck had aot been adequately addressed- After further discussion,
Men, Lapin moved, to uphold the DRB decision. Bob Buckley seconded t'bat motion' A vote was
and the motiou *"" a"i"ri"l,-t-1;;th Ji; Gibson,Jim g.hgarer,.!on^ s*F_"q,_T_1_l:ql^oj
;;#;T;il"i"r ifin"" &scussion, Men l,gpglgove{.to *:diry the DRB's approval to a oDe'vear
temporary approva:r *itl tl" plan as p*pot"a--fUi. motion also called for Larry Eskwith to draft a
written agreeloent o"i"L"-tU! "ppfi"fit--J[" 1.o.'^ *gariling t-bis temporary apProLal as it relates
to the removal of the ;;;Et";i[ iiu" a"t"-ti""J tr.tip" instlttauon dies not meet t'he Ya]yrot:Tf"Jt*[i"lif;#;r.'b;"B;;1"; ;;;;"d.Ilhe motion. A vote was ta.ken, and the motion paesed, 4'3,
.lE-S-U""t"t, Tom Steiuberg, aad Peggy Osterfots oPPos"&
-
ffied to items ten ana eteveu on tbe agenda- Item ten wls-t!:-Towu of vail and
val neso* Assoeintiq@) u'it"' c."t"f +c'""P3llpldqc^f:::P-cXf:?yi,,""f:Y ::::::
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Town Council
Community Development Department
March 8, 1994
Ore House awning agreement
Staff has reviewed the Ore House awning agreement executed between the owners of the
Ore House and the Town of Vail. The agreement states that:
"the Town council shall have one year after the final Building Department
inspection of the awning to demand modification ot the awning design or the
removal of the awning."
The awning was installed by the Ore House in late April or May of 1993. lt appears from a
review of the permanent tile that the Ore House never called for a final inspection on the
awning. Aftei a routine review of the files and activities, the Building Department discovered
tfre neld for a final inspection, and completed that inspection on January 18' 1994.
Thus, the Town has until January 18, 1995 to demand the modification or removal of
the awning. Such a demand is required to be in writing and must date the modifications that
are required by the Town Council or the demand for removal of the awning.
-E'.€>
.qf
o
Toirr,N oF vAttJsBD-vAtL.rNC.
AWNING AGBEEMENT
' THrs AGREEMENT mad€ ard enrered Inlo oo Juno 16, 199i by 8nd between th€ Town ot vat,
a colorado mJnlclpar corporallon flhg Townl,. ard sBD-vair. tnc., .tba The ore House, a colorado
. coDoralion (Th€ ore House.J
RECITALS :
t. on June 3' 1992' a hearing was hsrd beroro rho _Town ot va Desrgn Rgvrsvu Board lo -
delermlne whelhBr or not lo approvs The ore House,s appnca on lo Insra[ a permanenl awning
appro{mat€ly lwelvo (121 tsot ln deplh with comblned tength ot tirty-tive (55) teeq abng th€ west slJe ol
lfu Clod( Toryer buildtr€ adlacenl lo gridlp Streel.
'' 2, Subsequsnl to the hearlng. lhe Design Review Boad voted lo approvs Th6 Oro Houset
. application lor lhe hstattalion ol tho awning.
. 3. Ti€ dedsbn ot rh3 Design Review Boafd was app€ated to tho To. n courEl pursuarr b
the Municipal Code ol lhe Town of vait and a hearlng on lhe appeal was heard by lhe Town CourrcI on
Juns 16, 1992.
4. Subsequent lo the Ptss€ntatbn ol thb tads ietating to ths appeat betore tho loryn Councl,
lhe Town CourEil suggested, and the apptkant agreed, fhat the Deslgn Revievr Boards approvd ot tho
awning should be tnoditled tom a permanenl lo a tomporary approval, lasting not moro than ono (1) year
Irgm lhe dato ot ths lnstatlalion ol lhE awning.
5. fn" Town Courctr requosted that $e appfcar{ and thE Torrirn enler lnto a v,rflen
agteernent seUtr€ fodh tho tetms and conctitbns relating to thc temporary Design Revisw goard approval
ol The Ore Hous€ awning.
AGREEMEI,IT
NOW, THEFEFOHE, tho panies herelo agrae as tollows:
1. In acoordance wih thg decision ol rown councir at lhe Juns 16. 1992, headng appearing
th3 Deslgn Fevlgw Board approval ot rhe ore House awntng al the regulai meeting, Th6 ore Houso b
r!
hereby given a lernPotary apPrcvat lo Instalt the awning as nprs particutarly let lodh h lhg deslgn ard plan
altached to lhis sgtesmenl as Exhlbll 'A'. Subsequent to the Instaltallon ot lhe awning, The Town Counctl
shallhave one (l) y€at alier the llnal Building Deparlmenl hspection ol lhe ey,,nins to demand moditicalbn
ol rh€ annins desrgn or lhE ,",J*1il"*r-l-----'-- --==----'_-----Z Shot ld the Town Councl demand ellhgr ft€ rnodtrration or thB removal of the ailning, n
sh3ll notily The Ore House in wrlting of either ths modlllcatlon requked or lhs demand for removat, as ths
Ga3e.rnay be.
3.||ThaoreFbuseta[slomakothonecessa'y'pditicalbn|othoar,vnhgsettorthlntho.
-i
o
Toyvn gouncil mlbe or fatr lo renpvo lhe awnlng. a3 lhe caso rnay'be, wlhh tttlny (30) days ot sucrl
notlce, lhe Town or ns agenl ot rcgesentalives shall have lhs righl to enteionlo The orB Housg premlses
and remove tha awnhg. Any expanses inqrngd by the Town reht;d r0 the rernovar or the awnhg shal
bo FrrfSursed to rho Town by Thd ors HouEe wrhrn thlrry (30) days ot such ,emoval -
4. Tl'b agreemSnt represenb lho ent&a unde-tandno ot rhe par$es erd stEt not bo
amended gxcept bt a subsequent written agreement aignsd by the padles.
T}IE TOWN OF VAIL
t
Larry (9Atet, ac{ff town trlanaler
SBD.VAL tNC.
Btr
1i
{
csSq,EEtci
L
:
:1
'I
I
'. ._r,
':i:t,.il
':-;. .
'1
:::
.i*
i:,
.1.,:
:ir! I
t..{ .
iii', .,
RCIt,t :,:.
J:jl 1.. i\:1. :.. :t+, :;::i. :
i-.!, 'j
i41
r,!i:
oI
PMAMFRIWEDTHURREAOY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
BUILOINE
O FOOTINGS/STEEL
PLUMEING:
tr UNOERGROUNO
o RoUGH / D.W.v.O FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING tr ROUGH/WATER
n ROOF 8 SHEEB- PLYWOOD NAILING
.tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
O POOL / H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
o
D-
6//' o,FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAI.:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr coNoutT tr SUPPLY AIR
o B
O FINAL O FINAL
O DISAPPROVED O FEINSPECTION BEOUIRED
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJEGT:
MEMOFANDUM
Town Council
Community Development Department
March 8, 1994
Ore House awning agreement
Staff has revlewed the Ore House awning agreement executed between the owners of the
Ore House and the Town of Vail. The agreement stiates that:
'fie Town Council shall have one year after thE final Building Department
inspection of the awning to demand modification of the awning design or the' removal of the awning."
The awning was installed by the Ore House in late April or M1Y of 199& lt appears frgm a
review of t[e permanent tile that the Ore House never called for a linal lnspection on the
"*ning-
Afiel a routine review of the fites and activities, lhe Building Departnent discovered
tne neiO for a final inspectlon, and completed that lnspection on January 18' 1994.
Thus, ths Town has until January 18, 1995 to demand the mOdifiCation or removal ol
ths awnhg. Such a demand is reiquired to be in writing and must date the modifications that
are required by the Town Council or the demand for rEmoval of the awning.
o
:1"$:_i:51,.h:,V,1J3"q.C"1":rt.ft held oa 1\resday, Jr:ne 16, 1992, ar ?:80 p.m., in theCouacil Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building.
MEMBERSPRESENT:Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor'
Merv Iapin, Mayor Pro-Tem
Bob Buckley
Jim Gibson
Rob LeVire
Jim Shearer
Tom Steirberg
noDe
Ron Phillips, Towa lvla.nager
Larry Eskwith, Towa Attor:ney
_P_an pryodngyer, fu sistp'' t to' th e Towa Manager
Martha Raecker, Towa Clerk
MEMBER.S ABSENI}
TOWN OFFICIAIS PRESENT:
MINIITES
VAIL TOWN COI'NCIL MEETING
JUNE 16,1992
7:30 P.M.
ftem twelve- o1 tb9 3eeuda was a call up by Towa Cou:ccil of tbe Desigin Review Board (DRB) decision
fPnr-onng tbe installatioa of ga awni:og located on the west side of tbJ Clock Tower Building (Crorsuch
building) for tbe Ore House Restaurant, 232 Bndge Street, Iot A, Bloc.k S, Vail Village first filing.
Shelly Mello gave a brief overview of the pnoJect, stating the owaers of the Ore House Bestar:raat made
a rcquest Q 1g."? agr€en awaing approximately 12'in depth with a combined lengjh of 5b, aloag tbe
west side of tbe Clock Tower Building adjacent to Bridge Street Tbe Desiga Review Boaril votcd 3-2
Q a-ppryvg the requesl with Sherry porward aUag in hir motion the installation would extend the use
of the deck and add dtglity to tle area. 1J"6 6wsrhriey aad Geaa Whitten of the DBB opgcsed tbe
1otio.1, fiading-that 3lthough tbe_ request did conform with a number of the Vail ViUide Desip
Colsiderations, it would enclose aad narow Bridge Street to an uaacceptable level and would iot comply'with several of tbe Vail Village Desig;u Consider-ations. Ore House o-*'oe"s Larry Anderson aad John
Beaupre presented their project and stated they had fi:ll s;upport from.David forsuch, the builrli''g
owner. Rod Slifer, owaerof tbe adiaceut building, stated be was coacbraed wittr the per:oaaeacy of thi
ryar'ro!3q alarng aad the protnrsion of the buildiag into the street. Peggy Osterfoss said
-several
Design Guideliles bad not been !et, speeifcally, tberi was no varied beight, no irregular street edge,
and the su4 aled sbade issue oa tbe deck had not been adequately addressed- After fii:tber discussiJn,
Merv Lapin noved to uphold tbe DRB decision. Bob Buckley seconded t'hat motion' A vote was
""J tn"-i-ou"" *"r a.["t"a, sa, *iu ii. Gibson,Jim S-hearer,-Tom Steinberg antl Pegey Or
;;;;-i;Iil*jd i"ta.b"r &scussioa, Men Lapinmoved.to m.odi& the DRB's appmval to a one-vear
temporar;y approvar *itUlug plaa ry p*porud. Tbis motion also called for Larry Eskwith to draft a
written agree4eDt beLween tbe applicalt -a iU" Town regarding ttris teaporary approval as it relates
to the removal of the .*"i"g "ro"ri it U" a"e"-io"a t,bat tf," instllation d6es uot mee, 6" Y:lYltitf
desim coasideratious. noU-n".U"y seconded the motion. A vote was taken, ald the motion passed, 4'3,
,li--S1".t"", Tom Steinberg, and PeggT Osterfoss opposed'. H
o:.
. TOry.N OF VA|L6BD.VAIL.|NC.
AWNING AGREEMENT
'- ,--.->
ftE AGREEMENT tttado atld entsted lnto on &rns 16, l99i by and between thr Tovrn ot va!.
a cdb,rado rruni:lper corporation ctho Torrnl. and s€D,va[. rnc" oa The ore ]buse, a. frbrado
.corporalbn (Tho Or9 Hous?.J
FECITAUi
. 1. On Jung 3. 199A. a hoarlrE was hetd betore the.Town o, Vail Deslg'| Revlsw Board to - . ,.
dsl.rmlns wherhsr or nor to approv. The 0'6 House! apprcarron ro hstatr a perman.nt a$rnrr€ .
apptorr'Elely h^rehe (1?) tesl h dePth wlth cortlned terpth ot titlfnve (551 tscl. atong 111e wssl sirc ot
lhe Clod( Tower building adlacenl to grHge St eBL
e Subsequenl b rhB heatlng. lhe Deslgn Revlew Board voted lo approve The Oe House! .
. app[catbn lor ths hstatatbn ol tho awnlng.
.
' 3. Tha decbron ol lhe Deslgn Review Board ria3 agpealed lo th6 To$n counctr pur$ranl to . . .
.
lho Munic'rpal Code ol hE Tor'vo ol valt and a hearhg on tho appeal was heard by lhE Town Courrtr on
June 16, 199a
.,{.subsequen[rohePres€nl.uonott*'actsietat|ng|othqePP3alb€tofotIETov0councr.
lh3 Town counctr 9uggesled, and lhe appllcant agrsod. that tho Oeslgn Beviev, Eoards apprgval ol lho
-rf awnlng should be modilled trom aPe{manent |o a lorporery rpproval, tasting not rflgre than ons (i} yesr :
,'f\
J, f- Irorn hs dale ot th€ hslalarbn ot fio awnhg. .' : .
.
5. rn. Tovn Counclt roquesled lhat tho appttcant and the To$,n enler tnlo I wrflten
tgrcernenl sanlr€ torth lhs lerr|3 8rd cond or|s refa ng to the lemporary Destgn Revlew Eoard approvat
ol Tha. Ore Hou3e awnhg.
AGFEEMENT
NOw' TIJEREFOBE, th€ pad'les hereto agree aS lotbu6:
l. In eccordanc€ wirh the dgckron ot rown councfl at the Juna 16, 1992. hearlng appeatiDg
lho Desbn Rsvlew Board epprovar ot rha ore Hguse awnhg ar rhe regutai meating, Th€ oro Houso ts
heroby given a lemPorert epProvat lo hslall lhe ewning ss more pafliotarty lel lorth In the deslgn and ptan
sllsched lo thts agteemenl es Erhtblt *A'. Subsequent lo lhe hslathtton ot lhs swning. ThB Town counctr
shal have ong (l I ye_ar_a_!e4[frnal Bultdqypgpartrnent lnspedion ol lhe arvnhq to demard rpdirrcaibn-
^ ot lhg awning d6s'tgn ot th9 rgtiEval ol lhg awnino._+-\_-__:Z Should tha Toten Counc! demard elher lhs rrDdmca on or th3 removal ol tho avfiing. !
shatr mlily Tbo Oro House h wililE ot elhet tho modiricalion requtred or ths demand tor removat as ths
c3ge may bs.
3.llTheo'gHot,so|ai|s|omalro|hgnecessarysnodi'lcalbn|o|h9awnhgs€t'or|h|n|h9.
4
o
Twvn goulrr m{ca or tair lo remow |hE a$rning, a3 rhs case miy'us. wnrrrr |h|rty (30) days ot $rch
.' 'mllce, lhe Town or ns agent or iepresenlalives shal have the righl to gnler'onlo The c}16 Houss premises
and temova lha awnkE. Any €xPgt|sgs hdrned by thr Town rehid to lhe rsrnoval ol lh3 awnlng shatl
ba relrnbursed to rhe To'^rn by Thc or€ Houss wlhh thtrrt (30) day3 ot such rgtnorrat -
1, Thls agreement tept63e s rhe enth6 understandino ot ure lirries ana sfrail not be
am3rided ercert by a 3ubsequenl unllen agres6r96 ipq€d by lho parlies,
8f
T}IE TOWN OF VAIL
SBD.VAIL INC.
.r'lir
clbFotoulc.rgl
I
i'o;W
oerc /-/f 'fy'
o
INSPECT]ON REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL'
.1 ^fJoB NAME f,{a //ar,a ,flut+,,r/.. CALLER
.R€ADY FOR INSPEGTION:MoN @ wED FFI
LOCATION3
THUR AM PM
tr FOUNDATION/STEEL o BoUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
- NOOF A SHEEFu PLYwooD NAILING
D POOL / H. TUB
I.:
I i ..
,1.:' . :: ",'' : ,:':.::ii,-i:
.,.:...ii I' : j. .. .; .1.. :r' : ..., .-....:...tr
:: ...: ,.'...;.'... & .:.. t.r. rr
'J
;it,
i lt:
t:r
*--Fl-
__N
--c.)($I
i
{
;
.t
.'t
'zm
€
s6x
Emna
fll
T,s.t-,l
s-
F
[ 'J\Fl.tl|..
IF
lfir
-TtF
N-l$ ..
Lol d
tf
-|r)
(\J
F
UJ
. lrJ
E
Fa
trj
(9
o
E.
(D
Lot e
( s85o30.E ilEAS.)
R= l2OO'
L: l&85'
A= lQoggr
N8905t'E
TIE: S 29o44r E, tO.
.l
C AF€ C €AS €D ftE C-/+^TOrsucH
.
GORE CRE E K
. . DR IV E (40')
s/t s
>z
FEoc)
^
.JZLtmlj€l
lsf
lFf
lPf
t$t-?r
,fll-
'l o
\it1-l1
q
ilrIrrl
lfit-
-nF
NT
lr
r
1
.--a
'a
a/z
a
.,
!
,:.
<-.t,
I
I
l
\.f'o
t.+
\.
i
t.' t D "'.; q,
P
:," .f
-.9oI.
ct
a
Lot d
ill
-ro
(\J
F
UJ
. lrJ
(r
F(t
td
(9
3
E
(D
Lol 5 STORY BUILe
( s 85030.€ ilEAS.'
R= l2OO'
L=. 18.85'
a:goo9g'
^TorsucH
.
GORE C
N 89"51'E
TIE 1 S 29044: E, lO.
REE K -.DRIV
.a
,+n C-4
E (40')
s)t
ifl!zlmi€
I
IE
lc)x
PmnU)
|ir
$'I..-.l*
-Jt.
e
.N
-1.
t-rrl
Irrr-
_Tt
F
N-N
Tr-st' \.
-i'ac/z
iltftl
rl
:l
!l;l
;i
iii r
Lof d
rti
-lO
$J
F
trJ
. lrj
(r
F
(n
UJ
(9I
(r
(D
Lol e
( S 8so30.E rEAs.,
R= l2OO'
L: 18.85'
A= 99o99'
N 89051
TlE.. 5290.14'Er
cAF€ c€As€D.ftnc'/+
REEK -'DRtVE (4O'}
E
ro.
Ibrsucrl
GORE C
s/t
Project Application
ero1..tnu "4 4',/z ,4dd/'/)k2,' ,t'/n//t Ar/e b/t 232 ttt
,rto0<ZO -Qar€f
Proiect Descript;on' GrlrcA(h &nl
Contact Person and Phone ?rc tn3a7)
Owner, Address and Phone:
zzol
. ,f/bs
:rac/t e&3 E.ary Ceet<.,&t
,,/'I - ]'i.t , - /
l/&_t , ttt rrta'rzt f 76 - ZZff
Architect, Address and phone: *z- ro rh,r / /tlkl- alaue
5 ,u,^n /a"/ /r//ga, / {6/119
, ..*
Com ments:
Legal Description: Lot
,4rlrkr&
y'71
Bloc kc
Design Review Board
o,'" {ru/r^
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Staff Approval
l,€A no1fuF
DRB rPtrcrrroN - roHN
DATE APPLTCATION
rcvigcd 9lll9L
or vf,rr., "CIln*o
FSCEIVED:
Er0 APR I ls92
tttattttat
TEIS IPPLTCTTION TII.L NOT BE
UNIII. ltr.I. REQgIRED INTOAMf,EIOHttt*titttrr.@:
A.DESCRIPTION:
DATE OF DRB MEETING: @EiAFF Iti'PFoVAl-
ACCAPTED
IS SUBI(IIIED
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
Nen Construction (S200.00)V uinor Alteration ($20.00)
c.
D.
Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0)
ADDRESS:?72 zbl V (aca-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T,ot --Csubdivision \Ait Vltbc, Ft'fi+t Filiha
If property is described by a meets and bounds legaldescription, please provide on a separate sbeet and
attach to t,his application.
ZONING:Q>w^vr,l. Qv.UE.
F.
G.
LOT AREA: If required;
stamped survey showing
applicant mustIot, area. o
a curr
NAME OFMailing APP],ICANT:
Address:
H APPLICAI{T' S REPRESENTATIVE:
Address:QO q. f"va^Ft
I.NAItlE OE
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown abover are to be paid at
the tirne of submlttal of DRB application. Later, when
applying for a building permit, please identify the
accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vailwill adjust the fee according to the tabfe below, to
ensure the correct fee is paid.
NAI{E OFMailing
FEE SCHEDULE;
VAIUATION$ o - $ 1o,0oo
$101001 -$ 50,000
$50r001 -$ 15oroo0
$150,001 - $ 50o,0oo
$500,001 - $1, o00r o0o$ over $1,0001 000
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$500.00
* DESIGN REVIEII BOIRD TPPRO\I}! EXPIRES O}IE XETR AFTER rIN}I.
TPPRO\TAI. UNI.ESS T BUII.DINC PENMIT IS ISSUED A}ID CONSIRUCTIOX
STTRIED.
ITNO }PPLICATTON WII.I. BS PROCESSED h'TTBOUT OI{NER' S SIGNATURE
1
Phone
*SIGNATURE (S) :
Maili.ng Address:
o /(€
or*tDcE
'TREET +4
\9
\
\P ?//t'--'$, :
=l _ t
'I
r-$
T\
$
II
I
1\)aqt
- 'Y- Ff zca" l7l' @t- e 9a- al
.Sr-r-t.
Proiect Name:
Project Application
W,U
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner. Address and Phone:W.
Architecl. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
A*u d4 O* {J-o..*
Design Review Board
o^," 7/-f/
OISAPPROVAL
,/"r-/
Town Plan ner E Statf Approval
Project Application
Proj€ct Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:lPa-fi.c-.trnr
q \-6
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Descriplion: Lot Block Filing
f/
comments: c{ tt/
uf -+-/}i
Orc {l
lltWt (/.n
Design Review Board
Moti6n by:
o^," 7'y'- f /
DISAPPROVAL
"tn - '/
Town Plan ner E Statt Approval
Brlan llclnernqy
Vice Presldent
l{clnernqy-gcVey REal Estate
232 Brldge Street
Vall, C0 81,658
Dear Sfrs:
As pen attached blueprlnts, Gorsuch
as produced.
If pu have any further questions'
us.
Ltd approves the pvlposed drawings
please do not hesitate to contact'pfu
Gorsuch Ltd.'
Davld Gorsuch
cc: Oesign Review Board
Town of Vall
26, E. Gore CreeL. Drive, Vail Colorado Arc57 303/476.2294F2x303/4764923
| \t\Jv'1LZ-J-l L I nu:|. U'Jl. tI.UI T.UZ
t)
hl
\
V.=\,
q$
H'-/ffl-d'.-Io
dq/ l[Fy'ff
H /t ld=:ig
#; {{ril'Tl^,# \\i; hi.3T \\lrro '1d-H !\HdfK\
.Bqlit-t*;4
\*ffi\j\,-
t*,rAl
t
Y
iTtt*IG
II{,
'*.')
l,l
R,t
3t?1:/t?tA
tP c4ug--
ul
ao
$
;$f,:
$i
E$
3$
fi
" lE! At'ft'j I 21gS
IPPIICTTION DATE -:'
Q)f h 4
rloN,/lrNtN6 l"PLrCl![ION
(Plrare Prlnt or lDJrItc)
rhus or PnotEqr
IINIE OF PERSON SUBIIITTTNC
-I}.-. [i"{ ao^Jt l'-
aoxn V)b' yr s*,/ '
IDDNESS
ttlltE oF onNER
tlol|rrgal ol orxln
II'CATION OF PROJEEI
DESCRIIITION OF PROJEEI
\f
t1 6 -y(ot
J_6 C,
Ig3"*ffi.l*i"IT3T}I'iIoi;,ffi"sl"iI3B'Si3#'ff o",, n u
NEVIET.I BOARD.
r. DEsCRrtTroN oF THE ErcN/AwNrNG (M!-ErNl
inorscrrNc, ETcl, rNcIrtDE ErcN ltEssAGE'-l
ING, t|lI..L,'t l*tt 46-
ba" R te'/- Fprr*r'c{--2-C/{'.(8,:/tt{
.Uet !. E,
E.SIGN OR AWNING IIATERIAI,,U ollaY €sr,fffa
&z {,v
9.
K--
;Y\r.\
I
D.
D.
ErzE oF o\fERALr, SrGN' SrzE oF I.ETTERINC Al{D loco
,11e-f,l6p-€Y'i'UeY t'Z / /t"o't /g
/o,tr " x - L<7
IIEIGHT OF EIGN IBOVE CR,trDE
DESCRIBE IIGtfTInG (EXISTING OR
CONDOTTINIW }SSOCIAIION IPPROVAI., IITTACIIT
,/
^D ar.tE apEA PATII CK V i
EEEI l2o.OO PLus ll.oo PER SQIIAnE rodr or sIGf, AREI' PAIn w=fui
REourqEn ill?ER"lrc EUrur'l.FEn tlrllr rDDLlca'rrroN t}"
81tr Dlln;i;;"iiilr rhoutng -.ract locatt'on of slEn or
ewnlnE on tlrc DuUArnE
irr'dt5ir"prtc lnoving-pioporrc locatl'on
iororia icalr drrrlng
ff3Eil'3i"":f :i;l ?i'!iliit"
I
\
0\-
\
\\)
\
\
F.
G.
B.
fr
1,1 tt'l -
lt
--2. --
!'--l'-5.-
16.
-
slgn fanfnlltrator
,d* tl :
/.1 A tvY /\(.+ /oo
zY"t'l
r.
DRB APPLICATION _ ?OWN OF VAIL,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
**********
TSIS APPLTCATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPIEDI'NIII, AI,I. REQUIRED INFORMATION IS SUBIdITIED*t********
DESCRIPTION:
TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction
B.
Addition (S50.00)
C. ADDRESS:
D.LEGAL DESCRIPTION,:
Subdivision
Conceptual Revie (s0)
7-. t./ht t-
a meets and bounds legal
on a separate sheet and
ff property is described bydescription, please provide
attach to this application.
zoNrNG. --
L,OT AREA: If required,
stamped survey showing
applicant must provide a current
]ot area.
Phone
NAME OF APPLTCANT:
Mai1i49 Address;
LgZ Ar'su€'V1 **:{,p*
trrttl! Jr,l\ lfrl Jl]l NAME OF APPLICANT'Mailinq Address:
Phone
4+t"-'(g1.NAME OF OWNERS:
SIGNATURE (
Mailing Add
Phone
J. Condominium Approval if applicable.
K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at
Lhe time of submittal of DRB application. Later, when
applying for a building permit, please identify the
atturate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vaj-l
w111 adjust the fee according to the table below, to
ensure the correct fee is Paid.FEE PAfD: S
FEE SCHEDULE:
VALUATION
s 0 - s 10,000
$ 10,001 - $ 50,000
s 50,001 - s 150,000
$150,001 - s 500,000
$500,001 - s1,000,000$ Over $1, 000' 000
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00tEnn nn
C)4- f+6-^<--
revised 6/L8/9L
coroRADF,[ AUB 12 pgl
//s/ ^,/7/
,/
($200 .OOl lLuinor Alteration (920 ' o0)
*NO APPI,XCATION WILL BE PROCESSED WITHOUT OVTNER, S SIGNATUP€
v
., a
!t,
Lcoct_ tow:.* tsu,
t
on" L /F/ 4t
o{; 1*h_, \/4.Project Name:
Projecl Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Project Application
In-
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
I
!;
Mgtion by:
Seconded bv:
Design Review Board
,,," ( /'^/et
DISAPPROVAL
e'oUzr-f {-d
APPROVAL
Sum mary:
Date:
Town Plan ner E Statt Approval
vr
DRB APPLICATION _ TOWN OF VAIL,
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
r*********
THTS APPIJTCATION WTLL NOT BEUNTrL ArL REQUIRED
rl*NFO*RMAtrroN
reviaed 4/26/9L
cotoRADo
ACCEPTED
IS SUBMITTED
I.PROT]ECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPTION:
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New Construction Minor Alterat.ion
c.
D.
ADDRE;; TTl"7< ' *on-='""""ot"^' *""'"*
tEGAt DESCRIPTIoN: Lot
Subdivision
BIock
ff property is described bydescription, please providlattach to this application.
ZONING:
a meets and bounds legalon a separate sheet, and
E.
F.
H.
G.
I.
NAME OF APPLICANT:
applicant must provide a currentlot area.
PRESENTATIVE:6
LOT AREA: If required,stamped survey showing
Mailing Address:
NAME OFMailing APPLICAN?' SAddress:€r
"ffiLo1"?I'11^t' "Er^A'llt*SIGNATURE (S) :Maillng eddress:
Phone
Condominium Approval if applicable..7.
K.DRB FEE:
FEE SCHEDULE:
VAI,UATION
$ 0 - $ 10,000
110,001 -$ 501000
f5O,o0t-$ 1s0;000
$1s0,001 - $ s00;0oo
$soo, o01 - $1, ooo;ooo$ over $1,000;000
APPIICATION TIILL BE PROCESSED
FEE
$ 20.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$500 .00
WITSOUT OWNER' S SIGNATURE
t1
I
I
I,
?t'
I
I
I
,l
v
v;'c{:ta
Z/,,,
--5p
_-
.r I \. ---7(/ D*P '
( t )lt-<-- O/01'4/+^J4-O\--4 A)/'-
t^^- pau^-', aA d*- Czr l/'^"-
'b/ Wh',^-- Ou'w "'11 h--M/-.
,ri.J., '\-h
' I't
,..' \i '' q,l
June 4, 1991
Brian l4clnerney
l"Iclnerney & ttlcv€y
Clock Torrcr 81d9.
Bridge StreetVail, Co 81.657
Dear Brian,
In response to lrour letter requesting permission to place a display boxat the entrance to your office I give my approval on the crcndition that
same approval has been requested and given bV John eeaupre as ovmer of
The Ore House.
Best wishes,
Ssa.tets5@ulr\ I
s. David Gorsuch/.nancy MaJ t^sFF\
SDG/ntrn
Brian Mclnerney
Vice President
office: i503) 476.4854 2J? Bridae St..
Toll free: {8001 544.52J6 Vait. CO 81657Far: 1305i 4765955 tlome: (j05)4764857
Afiiliated withffiw
(t u'*, r,,r m r., r, r-r'r:u|
JLr..l 6 ',gt L4tL5 {-II I
JOHN J. BEAUPFE
ORE }IOUSE COHPORANON
BOX 4107
STEAII'BOAT SPRINGS, COLORADO 8T'477
303.87s-28&r Tsmp.30^:t?$426?Fax a/f/tt
lhr^{/lc,!'","ttt*+ ^ - .,
ilklrr*Mtt ,L1tU4 /h"P g#.-
l' I
h,^'^,
'i/rrh ,rtll &rrt* W
ffuau- @ru'" &'^ W' Y4/'c-
f--. ,l tt a A r.ntrr d/ wW'l-'A*t^,,*"f y*.{
,h4,n-rryT;.
WM-
lht*'rhrA4*dvL (t'e lttt-
1i"",^ otuJ'L8^u:1 Y;/ otltt tltt t't' 7Y'u'+t1 ' ' '--d-
fu-+ at*rr''heY
;r^d^fu"'d/4til*{! ,
l' W W"ry uwitl'{lrfl*
toh-rfL'hfhdP w'0,^?
Z. t/k- &Peur k'lwa'?rt-
fu^d;-6(M afittt*ryt
tr;;i'i*, @'WTt v 'ffi.uh-"
-t"'
iri'
Project Application
s-7-7o
Contact Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Archit€ct. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lol Block Filing Zone
Commenls:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Town Planner
I .?,?a
Stafl Approval
Invite nature into
your home
With the new
PANORTUW\
folding door.
All components for this folding door are
manufactured to your individual specifica-
tions. Widths of 3-6 m are available with
heights of up to 2.50 m as standard. Your
specialist rekord dealer will advise you
about the many possibilities and give you
any other help you require.
Tailor-made elegance
rekord's astra€al windows are the best
example of how experts are able to com-
bine modern techniques with faditional
crafumanship. Almost all shapes, colours
and sgles are possible. Only quality solid
timber is used. This is one of rekord's
specialities. The many different types of
astragal permit the design of sglish units
to suit all types of building. Those who
prefer "real' products will opt for the 'real
astragal" option. If only for ease of clean-
ing the more practically-minded willtend
to go for astragals fitted in the cavity
between the two panes or for astragalled
frames which can easily be fitted as a
supplementary extra.
UwYamn'
Project Appllcatlon
DEC 6, 1989
Project Name:ORE HOUSE SIGN CHANGE - OLD LETTERS
Project Description' UO0DEN LETTERS 0N I'JAL,L T0 LEFT 0F DOOR
Contact person and phone LARRY ANDERSON 476-5100
Date
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architoct, Address and Phone:
2r.rr r.ETTEn$ roR {-AlrT{LS, lI" r.Er.nE\S FOR BEI!!\INDER
Legal Descr
Commgnts:
Block
zJE BRIDCE sT
iption: Lol Filing . Zone
-
Design Review Board
Motion by: XERRIIiC'|ON
secondod by: WARR$N
APPROVAL
coNsFNT a-o
Date
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
BETSY ROSOLACK
Town Planner
r2/618eDate:
E Statt Approval
,\-
Appl ication Number
SIGN APPLICATION
Fee Paid
Name of Proiect
Name of Person Subtttitting
Location of Proiect
The fol lowing
to the Design
Sign submittal
information is required for
Review Board before a final
fee is $20-00.
Phone '['76 - st oo
the appl icant
be given.
.oDescription of Project \,,\*<- <r+ -<-r
.C\
. gt €v+&€.c= - i rr
--V.f.<---
A. Sign Material Iio4,!-
l
\<ro \"r lq,zZ
submittal by
approval can
L
B. Descript'ion of Si gn \J;^..u *r,i \-d--.
t\ . /"\ . \axrg-\\ i-< <;.^*-- (JtE \:\clr.sE-\J --.'
C. Size of SiSn <--q o\.-,.-.;,.^--y-",,t ).*{o.\
n Length of
Conments
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
1. Site Plan2. Drawings sfi6frli!-exact location3. Photographs showing proposed location4. Actual siqn -.-............-5. Colored scale drawing _6. Photograph of sign
Approved for DRB Submittal
oisapproved for DRB Submitta'l1
Slon-nAmini strator
Proiect Name:
Pro,ect Description:
Project Application
i- --Date r lt
Contacl Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPBOVAL DISAPPROVAL'
Sum mary:
Town Planner
Ilt:tr lt )naia. ''/ J :/'
E statt Approval
D\--l1r-"Application Number t!--
SIGN APPLICATION
tl
oate lrrl .r-r I 8n
Phone L-l-l.o - 5{ o o
The folluwing'information :'is required for
to the D:sign Review Board before a final
Sign submittal fee is $20.00.
A. Sisn Materiur bJ 6oJ .
Name of Person Submitting
Location of Project
Description of Project qL!--
submittal by the appiicant
approval can be given.
l
L
Paid t o lr', lf 7
Name of Project
B. Description (--\ \ \ { t rl
h<| ._:. r<-*--\ r^rL,'*c \.a ll\..,e.. sof Sigq
-t
c7* ;t
Uo,-aJL
D.
F
Length of
Comments ft*.-1 ;\
\ t:\ a "'-
.t (.
q,t\(--'^--o-\
-tr..,dUi ..Q-)<.{ s+s .
1. Site Plan
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
2. Drawings sEowTng exact locatjon
3. Photographs showing proposed location
Sign Admin'i strator
Sign Administrator
fD !L. uu-. ,-t. l'
jEs5,
I4. Actual sign _5. Co1ored sialefing--6. Photograph of sign
Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB Submittal
i
/rs lvvov<- 3 L 14
7\ 6 62---
(f ua r ( nr fL-J
t a^ /x rt-<- )*-a-oz<'<--a-;t'
D ft*A
to
P roiect Application 61, <-.:'ato lt -
Project Name:
Project D€scription:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing , Zone
-
Comments:
Design Review Board
Date
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
4- O
Sum mary:
E iii,. ,'
Town Planner
L / i s' ",/ ''/n^r. b/l) ii d
E Statt Approval
&
xft&-: tG
A*"!=-
Planning and Environnental Commission _9-o
o
A request for an exterior alteration in Comrnercial
Core I in order to partially enclose an existing deckat the Gorsuch Building, 28L East l4eadow Drive.Applicant: David Gorsuch
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST
This request involves a fairly modest addition to the
Gorsuch Building. As proposed, an existing deck at theeast end of the building along Gore Creek Drive would bepartially enclosed. The enclosure would encompass
approxirnately 1-30 sqfuare feet of new retail floor area.
The space !,rould be enclosed through the introduction of avery transparent wall between the existing deck and theroof overhang. Materials and detailing are alL consistentwith the existinq structure.
II. REVIEW CRITERIA
Any proposal that adds enclosed floor area to a buildingin the Vitlage core is reviewed with respect to the Urban
Design Guide Plan. This review entails both the GuidePlan (relationship to any sub-area concepts) and the
Design Considerations. Because there are no relevant sub-
area concepts, this review is limited to those applicable
Design Considerations. In addition, standard zoningconsiderations will be addressed in this memo.
III. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Because of the second floor location and relatively
innocuous nature of this proposal , few of the nine design
considerations are directly relevant to this proposal .
These considerations are the following:
1. Pedestrianization. Pedestrianization is not affected@
2. Vehicular penetration. Vehicular penetration intothe core area should not be increased as a result ofthis reguest.
frarnework. Given the second floor
is no effect on
TO!
FROM:
DATE:
I.
Streetscane]ocation for
streetscape
3.
framework.
4.Street enclosure. The relationship between the
Gorsuch Building and the A & D Building is slightlyaffected by this infill. However, the clrange is notconsidered a negative one given the width of Gore
Creek Drive and the tero story height of bothbuildings.
Street edqe. Street edge remains unchanged as aresult of this proposal .
Buildinq heiqht. The infill does not change thebuilding height because it occurs within the existingroof line.
7.
8.
Views. Views are unaffected by this proposal .
Sun/Shade. There isfrour this proposal .
The 130 additional square feet
have a neqrligible effect uponfunctions to this building.
no effect on sun/shade resulting
IV. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The only relevant zoning rnatter concerns the additionalparking demands generated b"y this expansion. The 130square feet equates to .43 spaces. This demand will benet by paynent into the Town parking fund prior to theissuance of a building perrnit.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff would reconnend approval of this infill proposal .While the second floor deck does provide some relief tothe north elevation of this building, the transparentnature of the infilL will be a positive irnprovement to thestreetscape in this area.
5.
6.
9.
v.
Service and Deliverof retail space willservice and delivery
o -To r,
loc'' 6(1
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Cornmunity Development Department
DATE: June 13, l_988
SURTECT: A request for an exterior alteration in Cornmercialcore I in order to partially enclose an existing deckat the Gorsuch Buildinq, 2SL East Meadow Drive.Applicant: David Gorsuch
I.DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST
This request involves a fairly modest addition to thecorsuch Building. As proposed, an existing deck at theeast end of the building along core Creek Drive would bepartially enclosed. The enclosure would encompassapproximately 1-30 square feet of new retail floor area.
The space would be enclosed through the introduction of avery transparent wall between the existing deck and theroof overhang. Materials and detailing are all consistentwith the existing structure.
REVIEI{ CRITERIArr.
Any proposal that adds enclosed floor area to a buildingin the Villaqe core is reviewed with respect to the UrbinDesign Guide P1an. This review entails both the GuidePIan (relationship to any sub-area concepts) and theDesign Considerations. Because there are no relevant sub-area concepts, this review is limited to those applicableDesign Considerations. In addition, standard. zoningconsiderations will be addressed in this memo.
III. URBAN DESTGN CONSIDERATIONS
Because of the second floor location and relativety
innocuous nature of this proposal , few of the nine designconsiderations are directly relevant to this proposal.
These considerations are the following:
1. Pedestrianization. Pedestrianization is not affectedby thi.s proposal.
2. Vehicular penetration. Vehicular penetration intothe core area should not be increased as a result ofthis reguest.
franework. Given the second flooris no effect onthis proposal , there
framework.
3.
streetscape
4.Street enclosure. The relationship between theGorsuch Building and the A & D Building is slightlyaffected by this infill. However, the change is notconsidered a negative one given the width oi coreCreek Drive and the two story height of bothbuildings.
Stregt ed.qe. Street edge renains unchanged as aresult of this proposal .
Fuildinq heiqht. trhe infitl does not change thebuilding height because it occurs within the existingroof line.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Views. Views are unaffected by this proposal .
Service.and Delivery. The 130 additional square feetof retail space witl have a negligible effeCt uponservice and delivery functions to this builcling.
qun/Shaqe. There is no effect on sun/shade resultingfrom this proposal
IV. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The only relevant zoning natter concerns the additionalparking demands generated by this expansion. The 130sCluare feet equates to .43 spaces. This demand will_ bemet by paynent into the Town parking fund prior to theissuance of a building permit.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
staff would recomrnend approval of this infill proposal .While the second floor deck does provide sorne relief tothe north elevation of this building, the transparentnature of the infill wiLl be a positive improvenent to thestreetscape in this area.
9.
v.
-' -'tt"i'
o
APPLICATION DATE:
May 30, 1988
OATE OF DRB I4EETIIIG:
ORB APPLICATION
June 15, 1988
southeast corner.of the Gorsuch Ltd. Vail_ Villaqe Store
*****THIS APPLICATION I.'ILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBI{ITTED**}**
I. PRE.APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-applicatlon meeting with a planning staff member is strongly suggested to' determine if any addltional lnformation is needed. No application will be accepted
unless it is complete (rnust include all items required by the zoning admjniEtrator).It is the applicant's responsibility to make an appointment with the staff to findout about additional submittal requirements. Please note that a C0MPLETE applica-tlon will streamline the approval process for your project by decreasing the numberof conditions of approva'l .that the DRB may stipulate. ALL conditions of approval must
be resolved before a building permit is issued.
. A.
'R.JECT
D'SCRI'TION. The enclosure of 3/4 of the balconlr on the
(McBride Building)
B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
263 East Gore Creek Drive
AOOTeSS
Vail, CO 81657
Legal Descriptjon Lot D&E Bl ock Filing Vail Vil-laoe
Zoning
C. NAI4E OF APPLICANT:David Gorsuch
Addrcss
D. NAME OF
\
263 East Gore Creek Drivevail_, co 81657 tel ophone
303-{76-
229 4
APPLICANT I S REPRESENTATIVE :Gordon R. Pierce, Architect
1000 South Frontage Road 1^7est
tel ephone
JUJ-
4433Address vai1, co 81657
E. MME OF OWNERS:David Gorsuch
Si gnature
ast Gore Creek Drive
Address _ vair, co 81657 tel ephone 2294
F.DRB FEE: The fee wi l'l
VALUATION
$ o-$ lo,ooo
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$50,001 -$ 150,000
$150,001 - $ .500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000$ 0ver $1,000,000
be paid at the time a build'ing permit is requested.
FEE
'$ 10.00
$ 2s.00
$ 50.00
$100 .00
$200.00
$300.00
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB:
1. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, the applicant must stake the siteto indicate property lines and building corners. Trbls that will be removed
should also be marked. This work nust-be completed before the ORB visits the
si te.
2. The review.process for NEll EUILDINGS will normally involve tlro separate meetingsof the Design Review Board, s0 plan on at least two meetings for the'ir approval.
3. People who fail to appear before the Des'ign Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ i shed.
lt,/.,i..-
,4'."r'd' NAME oF PRoJECT:. LEGAL DESCRIPTIOII:
o
LIST OF I'IATERIALS
c,D&E BLoCK 5
263 East Gore Creek DriveSTREET AODRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF P The enclosure o
outheast corner oe Store (McBride Bu
The fol I or,li ng i nformati on 'i s requ i red for submi tta I
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL
Match existing.
by the applicant to the Des'ign Review
COLOR
Gorsuch Vail Villase Store Rem.odel
Roof
Si di ng
0ther }la'll Materials
Match existinq.
Fasci a
Soffi ts
l,li ndows
lJindow Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck
Fl ues
l{atch existing.
l{atch existing.
Marvin, to match closely existing.
l{atch existinq.
Rails Match existing.
Metal.
Fl ashi ngs
Chimneys
Match existing.
Stucco to match existinq waI1s.
Trash Enc'losures
Greenhouses
0ther
N,/A
N/A
B. LANDSCAPING:Name of Designer:
Phone:
N/A
PLANT I'IATERIALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botanical Name Common Name Quani ty Si ze*
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REI'IOVED
coni fers .
. (over)
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height for
. . PLANT I'IATERTALS: BOtANiCAI NAMC.. ( con' t)
SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REI'IOVED
Tvpe
Comrnon Name Quani tv Size
Square Footaqe
GROUNO COVERS
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR I'IETHOO OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. 0THER'LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify.
F
U
Gordon R. Pierce. Architect r [.t.4.
U
May 13, 1988
COMPLIANCE WITH THE VAII VILLAGE
URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
Re: corsuch Ltd. VaiI ViUage Remodelproject: 1220
The proposed exterior alteration to the Gorsuch vail village storeinvolves enclosiag 3/4 of. the balcony on the southeast cor-ner of theMcBrlde Building.
The alteration to the corsuch store substantially complies with the vailVillage Urban Design Gulde plan for the followlng reisons:
1. The addition increases the transparency of the facade bybringing the windows to the street edge. The wlndow area isslgnificantly increased to faclftate a greater pedestrian
interaction.
2. The addiflon enhances the Mill Creek pedestrian path by upgradingthe Eoutheast corner of the building. Additionally, this
creates a stronger building creek connectlon.
3. Both the street enclosure and edge are lnproved because thebuilding facade is upgraded wlthout changing the basic building
edge.
4. The addiUon does not affect any of the follow.ing items: vehiclepenetration, buildlng height, views, or sun shade conslderation.
f 000 South Frontage Road West . Vail. Colorado 81657 . 30-7i41.6-4433
Gordon R. Pierce. Architect. A.l.A.
May 13, 1988
IIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OIVNERS
8OR GORSUCH tTD.
Re: eorsuch ttd vail village Remodel
Project: 1220
CASINO - Bridge Street condo Associauon
C,/o Brandes condos.
281 Bridge street
Vail, Co 81557
PEPI GRAMSHAMMER - 231 E. GOTE CTEEK DT1VE
Vail, co 81657
A & D BUILDING - Richard Santalli & George Pressln
#10 l{eather Lane
Lloyd Harbor, N.Y. 11747
)(=
*
a^'*-t t L* L** I
il{^ q
1000 South Frontase Road West. Vail. Colorado 81657.303 476-4433
Date
Date
of
of
APPI ication-szllOlffi
PEC lrleeting June 13, 19ee
APPLICATION FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I
VAIL VILLAGE
I. Planning and Environmental Comnission revlew is required for the alterationof an existing building which adds or removes any enclosed flooi area or
9!!99or patio or the replacement of an existing building L0CATED IN THE CCI
OISTRICT. FOLLOI,IING PEC APPROVAL, THE PROJECT_I{UST BE REVIEt,lED BY THE DRB.
The application will not.be accepted until all information is submitted.
A. NAME OF APPLICANT DAVID GORSUCH
ADDRESS 263 E. Gore Creek Dr.
Vail, Colorado PHoNE 476-2294
B. NAME 0F AppLICANT,S REpRESENTATIVE Gordon R. Pierce, Architect.
ADDRESS 1000 S. Frontage Road West
Vai1, Co 81657 PHONE 47 5-4433
c.NAME 0F 0tlNER(s) (pri r type)
STGNATURE( S)
ADDRESS Same as above
David Gorsuch
PHONE
D.LOCATION OF
ADDRESS
PR0P05AL: LEGAL
263 E.
Lots C,D & E. Block 5, Vail ViJ-lage
Gore Creek Dr.
E. FEE $100.00
THE FEE MUST BE PAID
REVIEI.I YOUR PROJECT.
PAID cK#BY Gordon R. Pierce.Architect.
BEFORE THE COM'IUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT t.lILL
II. PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE:
A PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE }{ITH A PLANNING STAFF MEMBER IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED
TO DETERMINE IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. NO APPLICAiioH tIiTT-
BE ACCEPTED uNLEss IT Is C0MPLETE (MUST ITCLUDE ALL ITEMS REQUTRED By THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR). IT IS THE APPTTcIHT's REsPONsIBILITY'To MAKE AN AppoTtT.
I{ENT I.IITH THE STAFF TO FIND OUT ABOUT ADDITIONAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION I.,ILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS
FOR Y0uR PROJECT BY-DECRilSINc rHE NUMBER 0F coNDrTtor,tS or nppnovnL-rHni---
THE PEc MAY STIPULATE. ALL coNDITIoNS 0F AppRovAL t4usT BE coMplrEt wrin sErongA BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. THE FOLLOI,IING MUST BE SUBMITTED:
A. Improvement survey of property showing property lines and 'location ofbuilding and any improvements on the land.
B. A list of the nanes of owners of al'l property adjacent to the subjectproperty INCLUDING PR0PERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, and their mailing
AddTCSSES. THE APPLICANT I,IILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES.
OVER
t
ccI
III. Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the fo]'lowing informatjon:
A. -The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at a scaleof l" = 20' sH0l.lING EXISTING AND PR0p0sED IMPR0VEMENTS To THE SITE. Avariation of the sheet size or scale may be approved by the conununityDevelopment Department if justified.
8. The date, ryflh_lfrow, scdl€ and name of the proposed development
l,lITH ITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION shall be shown on lhe'site ptan.
c. The existing topographic character of the site including existing
and proposed contours. This condition will only be required for-anexpansion area where there is a change of two fiet of jrade.
D. The existing and proposed landscqping, patios.
E. The location of all existing and proposed buildings, structuresand improvements.
F. .A tit'le report to verify ownership and easements.
IV. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITTEN AND GRAPHIC FORI,I A PREPONDERANCE
OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ENvIRONMENTAL cOMMIssION INDicATING
THAT:
A. THE PROPOSAL IS IN CONFORI'IANCE [.,ITH THE PURPOSES OF THE CCI DISTRICT- AS SPECIFIED IN 'I8.24.010
B. THE PROPOSAL SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES i||ITH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN
GUIDE PLAN REGARDING:
' l. Pedestrianization2. Vehicle Penetration3. Streetscape FramewoFk4. Street Enclosure5. Street Edgeq. Building Height7. Views8. Sun Shade Consideration
I'IANY OF THE ABOVE ITEMS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED 8Y GRAPHIC MEANS, SUCH
AS SKETCHES, SIMULATI0NS, M0DELS (INcLUDING NEIGHBoRING BUILDINGs),
PHOTOS, ETC.
IF THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A MAJOR CHANGE
DESIGN GUIDE PLAN, THE PROCEDURE FOR CHANGES
TO THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN
ARE NOTED IN SECTIONr8.24.220(B).
C. THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE h|ITH THE CHAMCTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
V. THE TOt,lN OF VAIL ZONING CODE FOR CCI ALSO DESCRIBES OTHER ZONING ISSUES
THAT THE APPLICANT MUST RESPOND TO IN WRITTEN OR GMPHIC FORM.
VI. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MAY DETERMINE THAT ADDITIONAL MATERIAL IS NECESSARY
FOR THE REVIEI,J OF THE APPLICATION
VII. APPLICATIONS FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS IN CCI INVOLVING
MORE THAN 100 SQUARE FEET OF FL00R AREA ARE ONLY REVIEWED SrNt-nrlrlunlLi. fnEvIIEED T0 BE suBt'tITTED BEFoRE THE FoURTH MoNDAv 0F t'tAy 0R NoVEMBER. rHe ieiH0LDS A PRELIMINARY REvrEw sEssroN wrTHrN. zl DAys 0F THE suet'|ifiet Dnri.' n
PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE HELD I,IITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE PRELIMINARY REVIEh, SESSION.
APPLICATIONS FOR THE ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT ADDS OR REMOVES ANY
ENCLOSED FLOOR AREA OF NOT MORE THAN ]OO SQUARE FEET MAY 8E SUBMITTED AT THE .
REQUIRED TIME OF THE MONTH FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REVIEI{.
FOR MORE SPECIFICS ON THE REVIEI,I SCHEDULE, SEE SECTION 18.24.065 A5.
* i'l , '1,---- I
Project Applicatlon
dtl
Contacl Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Addr$s and Phone:
-if ! ,;
',..-c,', .'
' ; t ' 'f L
Legat Description' 1o, i-* ' i-*ill , Btock l;'. ' , riting \,iu, l'''' , =on"
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPBOVAL
E statt Approval
,ll
NAME OF PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRiPTION OF PR
The fol l ow'ing
Board before
A. BUILDING
Roof
ETaW=ra -
o
la
r\
LIST OF MATERIALS
information is requ'ired for subm'itta1 by the applicant to the Design Reviewa final approval can be fiven:
MATERIALS: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Si di ng
Other t,|all Materials
Fasci a
Soffi ts
Wi ndows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Fl ues
Fl ash i ngs
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
Merr.L
(.rzeoee-. C-oqJee
B. LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
phone:
EXISTING TREES
BE REMOVED
PLANT MATERIALS: Botanical Name Common Name
PROPOSED TREES A=pET.T
E*rstrsa I F sAwr6AFoa L\F.sJ:A-
Quani ty
r-)1
Si ze*
T0 To trzupl rJ tF-5&l^lhaAEL
for conifers.
(over )
*Indicate caliper for deciducious trees.Indicate height
l.'
Botanical Name Cormon Name Quani ty Si ze
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
Square Footage
GROUND COVERS
s0D
SEED
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
C. 0THER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa1ls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) Please specify.
" PLANT MATERIALS:
(con ' t)
SHRUBS
Type
Project Application
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner. Address and Phone:
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:
Filing
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Sumrnary:
lfirnpurul -:::+
u$Wffi.n4*ru vAtL stcN sERvtcEs'
"
pu Y(&''p,a* *"ff:j
;"*,jr.s1,i$:ii,T*tff
'"'
t(qr
No.ol Pages
PROPOSAL SUBMITTEO TOf^nfr"effie9lrdAxd)'"o"'u-\A-1lk)DATE Trc4"'^"'2f;7 Wr(E{JOB NAME .
CITY. STATE ANO ZIP OODEtrP//,^(n 4l/^#JOA LOCATION
ARCHfIECT V' '-
/
DATE OF PTANS JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specilicalions and estimates for:
St6^/
/o,*ru
OF 5wtr7
Sr ffUprf hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specilications, for the sum
dollars (lB
of:
)
lo be made as tollows: ID"m^n tq9/fnnue utuil hlt/A/
/
All m.le.aal is gua.antced to be as sp€eilied. All wo.t to bc complela<l in r rorkmanlik
manner according lo standard paactlccl. Any all.ration or d.viation trom above sFcatica'
tiont involvinS arlaa costs *ill be cxcculed only upon witlen order$, and will trecome an
altra cha.ge orrcr rnd abova the estimate. All agreementg cantingent !pon tlrilar, accidant!
or dalry3 b€tond our control- Owner to cary fire, tohtdo rnd othei naca3iary in$rrance.
Our f,orkels ar6 fully cowred by Wo man's comp6nsation Ins!..nce.
Authorized
Signature
withdrawo
Note: This
by us if not
AfffplUnff nf flfUpm8[ -r,," above prices, speciricarions
and condilions are satislaciory arid are hereby accepted. You ar€ aulhorized Signature
lo do lhe work as spr€cified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
SignatureDate of Acceplancel
fORM ll&3 COPY>f 1060 - Availabls trom -aF-dslhc. G.olor. lJbss Ol45o
!r,r
'Ia]
llr7_r*-'lili,
*::;*H
h:
!r,r
'Ia]
llr7_r*-'lili,
*::;*H
h:
I -4I o
ZS south tronlage road
vail, qel666le 61557
(303) 476-7000
April 17, 1984
T0: SIGN APPLICANTS
FROM: Tom Braun or Kristan pritz, planners
RE: Sign Applicatjon Requirements
offlce of communlty deyelopment
when applications for signs are submitted, the foilowing informationis required:
l. site plan sholing exact location where the sign is to be located.
2. Photograph or drawing showing the building and where sign is to be located.
3. Exact design of sign (one or more of the following)
(a) scale drawing or rendering (must be corored exacily as sign wiil be)
(b) the sign itself is made
(c) photograph if sign is made
FEE: A $20.00 apptication fee wilt be requ'ired at time of applicat.ion.
(over)
TTTTT OOOOT 00TO}IH BOSOF
2? FEE I98? FRIBAY
REEEIPT * 44?55
COIFFIGUE LTN,.IfiRGARETIE
23E BRIBCE STREET
UAIL, t:0. 91658
IESCRIPTII'H'
SI6N AFPLICfiTII}H
91068841413
TOTAL
CASH cHECl4 *
lges
UU
UUUfiIL
l1'16ff1
OF sI{ITZERLANO
e9.08
29.88
RECEIPT BY
FOBO
Locotbd in the Voil Clrck Tolver Buildr, .o
Full Service Solon,
Hoir Design Noil Core Hoir Remowl
Europeon Fociols Eor Piercing
lheropeutic Mossoges lhe(o Both lheropy
Wdsso Scrub Acu-fresure Mossoge
Hers ond His Fomper Yourself Fockoges
232 Bridge Sheet \ibil, Colorodo 81657(n$47671(o
i1rr.rlly
SIGN APPLICATION
Fee Paid
N
N Person Subrnitting , "i *? - - t 2.if ^,'./f phone q2tr -ZJJJ
Location of Project ( . ,i /1 utr., 7 - "-=z .Dnt./7<- s-*
Description of .Project
,La
P?oiect,Fto,"fnr./L 6 + sL,/;
Date _J,l.JflZL
4t n r/A/-/d
Application Number
The fol lowing
to the Design
Si gn su bm'i tta 1
information'i s required for
Review Board before a finalfee is $20.00.
submittal by the appf icant
approval can be given.
A. S'ign Material _<a,- / z /zns /< /,zZ s /,rt n, ./
B.Description of Sign
L&o
9,Oa)
-7
Length of
E. Comrnents
1l
MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
1. Site Plan2. Drawings showlng exact 'location
3. Photographs showing proposed locaTion-4. Actuai sign5. Co'lored scald?FEilJiE-6. Photograph of sign
Approved for DRB Submittal
Disapproved for DRB submittil-
)1gn Aomlnlstrator
Sign Admi ni strator\
Proiect Name:
f', . .- / t, I i.-l I r^. \r/ i \ii.[\r \ \L;.
o
Date
Project Appllcation
\v'
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing ZoF.e
Commenls:
Design Review Board
".," ;1qf(?
APPROVAL
I
DISAPPROVAL
Town Planner
""," { irl(}
tt
E statf Approval
{7 t'1
75 south trontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
1987
ofllce of communlty deyelopment
January 6,
Mr. Dave Gorsuch
Gorsuch Limited
263 East Gore Creek Drive
Vai I . Col orado 81657
Re: Proposed beauty
Dear Dave:
salon n the Clock Tower Building
It has come to my attention that fire escape ladders and a new stairway aregoing to be required by the building code in order to add the beauty shop tothe Clock Tower Building. At the time the beauty salon proposai was rev'i ewedat Plannjng Commission, the staff understood that the remodel would be
completely within the building. Due to the fact that exterior changes are partof the proposal , it is necessary that further information be submitted. I am
asking that you or the applicant, Ms. Margarethe Chri sty submit the following
i nformati on:
A site plan of the deck area and building that wil1 indicate where the
new stairway will be located.
An elevation of the west side of the buildinq that will show the new
stai rway.
The appropri ate elevations of the Clock Tower that will show the fire
escapes.
4. A materials sheet should also be filled out that will indicate the paint
colors fon the sta'i rway and fire escapes.
The staff is concerned about the fact that fjre escapes will be placed on the
C'l ock Tower. There is a possibility that the P'l anning Commission approval may
be invalid, due to these exterior changes. Let's hope that the approval willnot become invalid and we will be able to work this out.
2.
I will be.out of town untilr6'it.:Monday. If you need'to talk to a planner
about the sitrietion before ltton-day, p1 ease conlact Peter Patten at 476-7000, ext106. Thank you fon your cooperation.
Si ncere'ly,
/, I g.l
TSuOnl,rkKntstan Pritz
Town P'lanner
KP: br
cc: Ms. Margarethe Christy
I
75 soulh fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
June 10; 1986
Mr. Dave Gorsuch
Gorsuch Ltd.
263 East Gore Creek Dri ve
Va iI , Col orado 8l657
Re: Cafe Gorsuch Dining Deck
Dear Dave:
office of communlly develoPment
As I am sure you are aware, the P'i anning and Environmenta.l Commission approved
your dining deck proposed at thejr June 9th meeting. The next step you need to
take is to draft a lease agreement to present to the Town Counci1 for theirreview. I have enclosed a representative Iease that you can use as a model for
your draft. Addrtional language I would request you add to this lease is:
1. Identify the dates the deck will be operational (as was discussed with
ihe Councii, the deck is proposed for summer use only).
Specify the dates that the deck will not bewjII be renoved). hre have recornmended that
parade) and the Coors Classjc be restrjcted
request language to permit the Town to add
as they may deve'l op, v,,ith adequate advance
you.
-,ili
luwn u I|ill
2.permitted to operate (and
the 4th of July (duri ng thedates. In addiiion, I would
adciitional restri cted daysn
notice of these days given to
Please forward this draft to me at your convenience. I wil'l then have it
revjewed by Larry Eskwith prior i,o CounciI review. In adrjition, I would
recommend that you contact Pam Brandmeyer to schedule your Liquor Board
heari ng.
I have scheduled this proposal for the Design
reconmended that ycu include planter boxes or
treatnent in conjunction with the dining deck.
Please do not hesi tat-e to cont.act me with anv
Sincereiy,
Thomas A. Braun
Seni or Planner
APP: lpr
inc, c s u;-e
Rer,iew Board on iune 18. The PEC
some other tvoe of sum$er fl ower
questr ons you may nave
I
FOR TMSH COMPACTOR INFOI',IATION, PLEASE SEE "VILLAGE TRASH COMPACTOR.''
'ill't rl
luwn
75 soulh fronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
January 14, 1986
Curtis Knudsen
P.0. Box 5560
Denver, Colorado 802.l7
Re: McBride (C1ock Tower) Bui'lding
Lots C. D- and E, Block 5, VaiI Vi1Iage lst F.iIing
Dear Mr. Knudsen:
The above referenced building was constructed prior to the Town of vailbeing.'i ncorporated. As a result, the Town was not invo'l ved in the in_spection of this construction. It can only be assumed that constructionconformed to Eagle County building codes.
The property is zoned.cornmercial core I and to the best of our knowlegeall uses in the building are in compliance with those permitted.i n thiszone district.
Sincereiy,
/Te^lrRa*,---
Thomas A. Braun
Town Planner
TA8: bpr
Project Application
Sr a{-
rI
Oz-S v c:Project Name:
Proiect Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Comments:Sau
lrn 4 br*--/-d
Design Review Board *- ,fnfF/
DISAPPROVAL
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
Summary:
{ a,"u Approval
D\.-o
Apfi pf icat'ion Number
Fee Paid Wnbz 2o,5D SIGN APPLICATION
Date
Name of Project -rwE <AFF AiT- Go€sJ+l
Name of Person Subrnitt'ing VAtl <tr--x)- aa.P-l- Phone 4zl4-b7lo
Locatjon of Project CoeE CeEeL >2.
Description of Proiect SAcJDBLASTFn P€Dtl)ooP
Is r r--N j t P-o r.J 6e,4.<z-err
The following information 'is required for submittal by the applicant
to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given.
S'ign submittal fee is $20.00.
A. Sign Material
B. Description of Sign
SUBMITTED I,IITH APPLICATION
1. Site Plan2. Drawings sfiowTng-ilKact location
3. Photographs showing proposed lo
4. Actual si gn _- ,/s. +++orea sial6-dFailIifl----1' -6. Photograph of sign
Sign Administrator
,/t/ ,/cation r'
Approved for DRB Submjttal
Disapproved for DRB Submitta'l
,-r,/ ,l//-*'L
Jl L.,4.*;: !,'1.-.,
?.:i'i*.i i! i' t"
r i- r..: .
c-j F: i,.v-: l''-'-\
Flr.i....rii. 1':! t..
tt
l*'---* *- -" *--r-----J
tl '
,na3
THtrW
7^ . ^..{Cre o9
o
t't (1" ' '
{rr "
,( F'-{Ow-:._.t-
,r--;
{rr"'o
".y'
i
.r18'
3t"
sra-fi4\ , -.-o.- -Zie'e-
TTTN CAEE
€L-€VAf1 oN)
t"---|
-r!
-"'i!trtu iIIf- Y
--
I
--In
I
^YV II af,-?) ,
|5
-'
7/z s/ r '-
only member that feit that perhaps a larger menu box may be a way
to solve the Dr obl- em.
The motion was made bv Viele and seconded bv Donovan to recommend
denial- of the proposal,. The PLanninq Commission asked the staff
to pass on the concerns to tbe Town Counci-I vith respect to the
;-"rro;'a.tteration of less than loo square
Tom Braun presented the staff memorandum e xpla i ni ng tha t a
compromi se solutlon had been reached with the applicant and that
the staft was now supporting this request to now enclose the
pJ.anter at the southeast corner ot the Gorsuch building. Statf
was originally not in favor of the request because of the loss of
landscaping on the s1te. The applicant proposed installing a
portion of the landscaping as shown on t.he Gorsuch exterior
remode.I p-Lans dated 8/29/A3- This wou-ld inc-Iude the three most
westerly trees that are Located on the applicant's property as
r're.Ll as brick pavers running the length ot the store along Gore
Creek Dr i ve.
A motion was made bv Viele and seconded bv Donovan to approve the
A request to amend the deveLopment plan for Crossroads
Center at 143 East Meaoow Drive. Appllcant: Snowquest
A motion r,/as ma de and seconded to tabf e this proposaL and the
vote to tabl-e was 4-O in favor.
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
o
Planning and Environmental Comnrission
Corununi ty Development
September 23, I985
A request for an exterior alteration in order toenclose an existing planter at Gorsuch Ltd. in VailVillage. Applicant: Dave Gorsuch
THE PROPOSAL
This proposal is to enclose an existing planter located alongGore CYeek Drive at the southeast corner of Gorsuch Ltd. Theenclosure is approximately 44 square feet and would be used forthe display of merchandise. Exterior finishes of this enclosurerrvould be similar to the existing finishing details throughout thebuilding.
TO BE USED IN EVALUATING APPLICATIONS
As the Planning Conunission is aware, applications for additionsor new constr uction in Commercia I Cor e I involve review withrespect to the urban Design Guide plan. These involve both thesub-area concepts as delineated in the Guide plan and map as wellas the Design Considerations outlined for the Viltage, fnaddition to this are standard zoning considerations. This memowill address this proposal with respect to these review criteria.
COMPLTANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The Urban Design Guide Plan identifies a number of sub-areaconcepts which are to be addressed in any r edevelopment oradditional development in the Vi1lage. Iiowever, none of thesesub-area concepts are impacted by this proposal . As a result,these sub-areas are not a factor in reviewing this application.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATTONS FOR VAIL VILLAGE
fhe following Design Considerations are identified as the primaryform giving physical features of the Village. rt is the burdenof the applicant to demonstrate that this proposal substantiallycomplies with these considerations or that the proposal does nototherwise alter the character of the neighborhood. How thisproposal reLates to the nine consider ations is summarized below.
Pedestrianization
ped es tr ran corr idorThis proposal wil. l
func tions .
. Gor e Cr eek Drive serves as both aand a vehicle access way in this area.not adversely affect ei ther of these two
EXT ER I OR
Vehicular Penetration.Not applicable to this proposal .
o
Streetscape Framework. Streetscape framework deals with theq@ experiencL amor4t the pedestrianwayswithin Vail Village. fr'lr> general types of improvements asoutlined in the Guide plan include the use of open space and
landscaping as a colorful framework linkage along pedestrianroutes and the infitl of commercial store fronts to create
commercial activity and street life along pedestrian corri-dors. This proposal will add store front display area to
Gorsuch's that will in some respects provide visual activityfor the pedestrian. Gr the other hand, it will also eliminatea planter that can be utilized in the display of flowers andother plantings. There presently exists a large amount of
windokr display and a very smal l amount of landscaped area onthis site. It is recognized that a variety of these tltrofeatures is a preferred alternative. With respect to thisproposal , the elimination of this planter area is seen as anegative impact on the existing streetscape.
Str eet Enc losur e This criteria is not impacted by thisproposa.l
Street Edge. ft is the intent of the Guide plan to develop5-E-fiagftore with a strong but irregutar edge to thAstreet. This type of develognent gives a certain amount oflife to the street and visual interest to the pedestrian.While this prolrcsal would enclose a portion of the buildingthat is recessed from the street, the relatively small sizeof the encLosure deems it to be a fairly insignificant factor.
Building Height . Not appl icable.
Views. This proposal does not affect any view corridors.
Service and Delir"ry. Not applicable.
Sun/Shade. tdot applicable.
ZON]NG CONSIDERATTONS
ff approved, this proposal rrrould contribute to the parking demandcreated by Gorsuch Ltd. Payment of applicable parking fees eroutdbe required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Section 18.24.I70 of the Zoning Code outlines landscaping andsite development standards for the village core. This reads asfollows:
No reduction of landscaped area shall be permitted withoutsufficient cause shown by the applicant or as specified inthe Vail Village Design Considerations.
As clear ly stated in this zoning criter ia, the el imination oflandscaped area is prohibi ted unless sufficient cause is demon-strated by the applicant or the elimination of landscaped area is
the result of some consideration in
Guide Plan. fn this situation, theally recommend that this landscaped
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
the Vail Village Llrban DesignGuide Plan does not specific-
area be r emoved .
Staff recommendation for this request is denial . While the totalarea to be enclosed is only 44 square feet, it is felt that ifproperly maintained, this planter could provide a great deal ofcolor and life to this site. The intention of the applicant toincrease the store front display is not considered a detrimentalstep. However, it is the feeling of the staff that to sacrificethis existing planter for additional display area is not inkeeping with the Design Considerations outlined in the GuidePlan. This position is also substantiated by the Summer eualitysurveys that have indicated our guests to be very impressed withthe flowers and color found throughout the Village during the
s ummer monthS .
This proposal would not be nearly as objectionable to the staffif alternative Locations were available on the site to locate a
new planter. llcwever, this building is constructed right to theproperty lines (in some cases, over the property lines) in the
area of this proposal . While the applicant has proposed locatingdecorative wooden pots with smal l pines in front of the store,
these are not considered an appropriate trade-off when consideringthe loss of a permanent planter.
e
Planning anq Environmental Commission
September 23, I985
2:00 Site Inspections Meet at Foundersr plaza at 2:00.
3:00 Public Hearing
l. Approval of minutes of September 9, lg85
2, Appointment of member to DRB for 0ctober, November, December
3. Request for exterior alteration in order to add a third story at
the Hill Building at 3l l Bridge st. Applicant: Blanche Hill
4. A request to amend Section 16.04 of the Municipal Code by adciing a
new category of "Special Boards" to the Sign Code.Applicant: Restaurant Association of Vail
5. A request for an exterior altertation of less than 100 square feetin order to enclose an existing p'lanter at Gorsuch at 263 E. Gore CreekDrive. Appl icant: Dave Gorsuch
T0 BE TABLED 6. A request to amend the development plan for Crossroaas Center at.|43 East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Snowquest partners
7/z s/ r '-
only member that feit that perhaps a larger menu box may be a way
to solve the Dr obl- em.
The motion was made bv Viele and seconded bv Donovan to recommend
denial- of the proposal,. The PLanninq Commission asked the staff
to pass on the concerns to tbe Town Counci-I vith respect to the
;-"rro;'a.tteration of less than loo square
Tom Braun presented the staff memorandum e xpla i ni ng tha t a
compromi se solutlon had been reached with the applicant and that
the staft was now supporting this request to now enclose the
pJ.anter at the southeast corner ot the Gorsuch building. Statf
was originally not in favor of the request because of the loss of
landscaping on the s1te. The applicant proposed installing a
portion of the landscaping as shown on t.he Gorsuch exterior
remode.I p-Lans dated 8/29/A3- This wou-ld inc-Iude the three most
westerly trees that are Located on the applicant's property as
r're.Ll as brick pavers running the length ot the store along Gore
Creek Dr i ve.
A motion was made bv Viele and seconded bv Donovan to approve the
A request to amend the deveLopment plan for Crossroads
Center at 143 East Meaoow Drive. Appllcant: Snowquest
A motion r,/as ma de and seconded to tabf e this proposaL and the
vote to tabl-e was 4-O in favor.
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
o
Planning and Environmental Comnrission
Corununi ty Development
September 23, I985
A request for an exterior alteration in order toenclose an existing planter at Gorsuch Ltd. in VailVillage. Applicant: Dave Gorsuch
THE PROPOSAL
This proposal is to enclose an existing planter located alongGore CYeek Drive at the southeast corner of Gorsuch Ltd. Theenclosure is approximately 44 square feet and would be used forthe display of merchandise. Exterior finishes of this enclosurerrvould be similar to the existing finishing details throughout thebuilding.
TO BE USED IN EVALUATING APPLICATIONS
As the Planning Conunission is aware, applications for additionsor new constr uction in Commercia I Cor e I involve review withrespect to the urban Design Guide plan. These involve both thesub-area concepts as delineated in the Guide plan and map as wellas the Design Considerations outlined for the Viltage, fnaddition to this are standard zoning considerations. This memowill address this proposal with respect to these review criteria.
COMPLTANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The Urban Design Guide Plan identifies a number of sub-areaconcepts which are to be addressed in any r edevelopment oradditional development in the Vi1lage. Iiowever, none of thesesub-area concepts are impacted by this proposal . As a result,these sub-areas are not a factor in reviewing this application.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATTONS FOR VAIL VILLAGE
fhe following Design Considerations are identified as the primaryform giving physical features of the Village. rt is the burdenof the applicant to demonstrate that this proposal substantiallycomplies with these considerations or that the proposal does nototherwise alter the character of the neighborhood. How thisproposal reLates to the nine consider ations is summarized below.
Pedestrianization
ped es tr ran corr idorThis proposal wil. l
func tions .
. Gor e Cr eek Drive serves as both aand a vehicle access way in this area.not adversely affect ei ther of these two
EXT ER I OR
Vehicular Penetration.Not applicable to this proposal .
o
Streetscape Framework. Streetscape framework deals with theq@ experiencL amor4t the pedestrianwayswithin Vail Village. fr'lr> general types of improvements asoutlined in the Guide plan include the use of open space and
landscaping as a colorful framework linkage along pedestrianroutes and the infitl of commercial store fronts to create
commercial activity and street life along pedestrian corri-dors. This proposal will add store front display area to
Gorsuch's that will in some respects provide visual activityfor the pedestrian. Gr the other hand, it will also eliminatea planter that can be utilized in the display of flowers andother plantings. There presently exists a large amount of
windokr display and a very smal l amount of landscaped area onthis site. It is recognized that a variety of these tltrofeatures is a preferred alternative. With respect to thisproposal , the elimination of this planter area is seen as anegative impact on the existing streetscape.
Str eet Enc losur e This criteria is not impacted by thisproposa.l
Street Edge. ft is the intent of the Guide plan to develop5-E-fiagftore with a strong but irregutar edge to thAstreet. This type of develognent gives a certain amount oflife to the street and visual interest to the pedestrian.While this prolrcsal would enclose a portion of the buildingthat is recessed from the street, the relatively small sizeof the encLosure deems it to be a fairly insignificant factor.
Building Height . Not appl icable.
Views. This proposal does not affect any view corridors.
Service and Delir"ry. Not applicable.
Sun/Shade. tdot applicable.
ZON]NG CONSIDERATTONS
ff approved, this proposal rrrould contribute to the parking demandcreated by Gorsuch Ltd. Payment of applicable parking fees eroutdbe required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Section 18.24.I70 of the Zoning Code outlines landscaping andsite development standards for the village core. This reads asfollows:
No reduction of landscaped area shall be permitted withoutsufficient cause shown by the applicant or as specified inthe Vail Village Design Considerations.
As clear ly stated in this zoning criter ia, the el imination oflandscaped area is prohibi ted unless sufficient cause is demon-strated by the applicant or the elimination of landscaped area is
the result of some consideration in
Guide Plan. fn this situation, theally recommend that this landscaped
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
the Vail Village Llrban DesignGuide Plan does not specific-
area be r emoved .
Staff recommendation for this request is denial . While the totalarea to be enclosed is only 44 square feet, it is felt that ifproperly maintained, this planter could provide a great deal ofcolor and life to this site. The intention of the applicant toincrease the store front display is not considered a detrimentalstep. However, it is the feeling of the staff that to sacrificethis existing planter for additional display area is not inkeeping with the Design Considerations outlined in the GuidePlan. This position is also substantiated by the Summer eualitysurveys that have indicated our guests to be very impressed withthe flowers and color found throughout the Village during the
s ummer monthS .
This proposal would not be nearly as objectionable to the staffif alternative Locations were available on the site to locate a
new planter. llcwever, this building is constructed right to theproperty lines (in some cases, over the property lines) in the
area of this proposal . While the applicant has proposed locatingdecorative wooden pots with smal l pines in front of the store,
these are not considered an appropriate trade-off when consideringthe loss of a permanent planter.
e
Planning anq Environmental Commission
September 23, I985
2:00 Site Inspections Meet at Foundersr plaza at 2:00.
3:00 Public Hearing
l. Approval of minutes of September 9, lg85
2, Appointment of member to DRB for 0ctober, November, December
3. Request for exterior alteration in order to add a third story at
the Hill Building at 3l l Bridge st. Applicant: Blanche Hill
4. A request to amend Section 16.04 of the Municipal Code by adciing a
new category of "Special Boards" to the Sign Code.Applicant: Restaurant Association of Vail
5. A request for an exterior altertation of less than 100 square feetin order to enclose an existing p'lanter at Gorsuch at 263 E. Gore CreekDrive. Appl icant: Dave Gorsuch
T0 BE TABLED 6. A request to amend the development plan for Crossroaas Center at.|43 East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Snowquest partners
75 3oulh fronlaga roed
v.it, coloredo 816i7
(303) 476-7000
September 26, 1985
Dave Gorsuch
263 East Gore Creek DriveVailr Colorado 81657
Re: Gorsuch Planter Enclosure
Dear Dave:
As f am sure you are ahrare, your planter enclosure receivedPlanning Commission approval on September 23rd. As waa agreed byRenee, a condition of the approval $ras to do the on-grade pavertreatment that was originally proposed in 1983r as nell as threeof the most westerly trees proposed with that plan- In lookingat the property linesr it appears that these three treee can beinstalled on your property. This would seemingly eliminate theobstacle with the Public Works Department and their objections totrees planted on the town right-of-way. It should be mentioned,howeverr that you may neIl be responsible for clearing snow fromthe area around these ner., trees.
We have scheduled your renodel for the October 2nd Design ReviewBoard meeting. At this tine we should include as a part of thissubnittalr the pavers and trees that nere originally a part ofthe 1983 Planning Commission eubmittal. In additionr the specifictype of paver to be used as well as the type of tree and sizeshould be determined. In the interimr we will notify the public
Works Departnent of this new development.
Please do not hesitate to cal.l me with any questions you may have.
We are excited to see these etreetscape improvements being donein conjunction with your 6ma11 building expansion. Thanks foryour efforts to improve the landscaping in this area of the
Vi I laoe .
Sincerely I
T-."--
Thomas A. Braun
DATB :E:ff*!{9 S5,955
llr cl, tlrc f
RECEIVED FROM
Permit Numbers
n|' ?D*cash-clrP,kt' -" ('v .-::,t. lci
TO:
FRO}1 :
DATE:
SUB.JECT:A r equest for an exter ior alteration in order toencl.oge an existing planter at Gorsuch Ltd. in VailVi1lage. Applicant: Dave Gorsuch
THE PROPOSAL
This proposal is to enclose an existing planter located alongGore Creek Drive at the southeast corner of Gorsuch Ltd. TheencLosure is approximately 44 square feet and would be used forthe display of merchandise. Exterior finishes of this enclosurewould be similar to the existing finishing details throughout thebuilding.
CRITERIA TO BE USED IN EVALUATING APPLICATIONS FOR EXTERIOR
ALTERATI CNS
As the Planning Conunission is aware, applications for additionsor new constr uction in Commercia I Cor e f involve review withrespect to the Urban Design Guide plan. These involve both thesub-area concepts as delineated in the Guide Plan and map as wellas the Design Considerations outlined for the Village. fnaddition to this are standard zoning considerations. This memowill address this proposal with respect to these review criteria.
CCMPLTANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN
The tlrban Design Guide Plan identifies a number of sub-areaconcepts which are to be addr: essed in any redevelopment oradditional development in the Village. However, none of thesesub-area concepts are impacted by this proposal . As a result,these sub-areas are not a factor in reviewing this application.
COIT,IPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CoNSIDERATIoNS FoR VAIL VILLAGE
The following Design Considerations are identified as the primaryform giving physical features of the Village. It is the burdenof the applicant to demonstrate that this proposal substantiallycomplies lsith these considerations or that the proposal does not
otherr',,ise alter the character of the neighborhood. How thi sproposal relates to the nine considerations is summarized below.
Pedestr iani zation
Planning and Envir onmenta 1
Community Development
September 23, 1985
t)
pedestr ]'an corr idorThis proposal willfunctions.
. Gore Cr eek Drive serves as both aand a vehic le access way in this area.not adversely affect either of these two
Vehicutar Penetration.Not applicable to this proposal .
Streetscape Framework. Streetscape framework deals with the
@ experience among the pedestrianways
within Vail Village. Tvlo general types of improvements as
outlined in the Guide Plan include the use of open space and
landscaping as a colorfut framework linkage along pedestrian
routes and the infill of commercial store fronts to create
commercial activity and street life along Pedestrian corri-
dors. Thie proposal will add store front display area to
Gorsuch's that wilt in some respects provide visual activityfor the pedestrian. cl the other hand, it will also eliminatea planter that can be utilized in the display of flowers andother plantings. There presently exists a large amount of
window display and a very small amount of landscaped area on
this site, It is recognized that a variety of these tralofeatures is a preferred alternative. With respect to thisproposal, the elimination of this planter area is seen as anegative impact on the existing streetscape.
Street Enclosure. This criteria is not impacted by thisffi
Street Edge. It is the intent of the Guide Plan to develop5--VTIEffiore with a strong but irregular edge to the
street. This type of development gives a certain amount oflife to the street and visual interest to the pedestrian.
While this proposal would enclose a portion of the buildingthat is recessed from the street, the relatively small sizeof the enclosure deems it to be a fairly insignificant factor.
Building Height. Not
Views. This proposal
Service and Delivery.
appl icable.
does not affect any view corridors.
Not applicable.
Sun/Shade. tdot applicable.
ZONING CONSIDERATI ChIS
ff approved. this proposal uould contribute to the parking demandcreated by @rsuch Ltd. Payment of applicable parking fees lvould
be required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Section 18.24.I70 of the Zoning Code outlines landscaping andsite development standards for the Village Core. This reads asfollows:
No t:eduction of landscaped area shall be permitted withoutsufficient cause shown by the applicant or as specified inthe Vail Vilfage Design Considerations.
As clearly stated in this zoning criteria, the elirnination of
landscaped area is prohibited unless sufficient cause is demon-strated by the applicant or the elimination of landscaped area is
the result of some consideration in
Guide Plan. fn this situation, theally recommend that this landscaped
STAFF RECOMIT,IENDATT ON
the Vail ViJ. lage Urban Design
Guide Plan does not specific-
area be r emoved.
Staff recommendation for this reguest is denial . While the totalarea to be enclosed is only 44 square feet, it is felt that ifproperly maintained, this planter could provide a great deal ofcoLor and life to this site. The intention of the applicant toincrease the store front display is not considered a detrimentalstep. Hov/ever, it is the feeling of the staff that to sacrificethis existing planter for additional display area is not in
keeping with the Design Considerations outlined in the GuidePlan. This position is also substantiated by the Summer Q.ralitysurveys that have indicated our guests to be very impressed withthe flowers and color found throughout the Village during the
s ummer months.
This proposal hrould not be nearly as objectionable to the staff
if alternative locations were available on the site to locate a
ne!t, planter. llowever, this building is cone tructed right to the
Property lines (in some cases, over the property lines) in the
area of this proposal . While the applicant has proposed locatingdecorative wooden pots with small pines in front of the store,
these are not con6ider ed an appropriate trade-off when consider ingthe loss of a permanent planter.
d
)/
PP9I
LYUeY Jr
rih-q\on^
4D%'hA*y
ti{<carp,toqp; ' 0
+Feoolp^-"*t
;/ old h^tt*f
/dafu ry,. ILyix
($tuu
I o^t"tt^ \UsC
\L,rf o{ n^Jil,ut
t
AppDate of lication
APPL,ICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR AITERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAI., CORE 1 (CCI)
I.This procedure is required for alteration of an existing building
which- adds or removeJ any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio or
replacement of an existing building shall be subject to review by
the Ptanning and Environmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted until- all information is submitted.
A. NAI',IE OF APPLICANT
B.
ADDpe,ss (nq €., (ML c(tv 0(. pnonn-ML.7w--
NA}!E OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT I S REPRESENTATIVE
NAME OF OI,INER
SIGNATURE
ADDRB*I ilql 6ffi -hvd&
VLfl.. C0. pHoNE-.41h:l)@--
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FEE $10 0.00 PAID
vF. II{PROVEMENT SURVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWING PROPERTY
OF BUILDING AND ANY IMPROVEI{ENTS ON THE LAND.
E.
G.
A}ID LOCAIION
A LIST OF THE NAME OF OIVNERS OF AII., PROPERSY AD.'ACENT TO THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY and their mailing addresses.
II . Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following information:
A. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at a scale
of I" = 2-0'; a variation of the sheet size or scale may be aPProved
by the Comnunity Development Department if justified;
' . Apptication for irior Alteration or Modirl "", page z
./' 1
(5. The date, North arrow, scale and name of the proposed development
shall be shown on the site PIan;
,C.- The existing topographic character of the site including exisEing
and proposed contonri. This condition will only be regured for
expansion area where there is a change of two feet of grade;
"D. The location and size of al-l existing and proposed buildings, struc-
tures and irnprovements i
E. The existing and proposed landscaping;
F. The location of all eiisting and proposed buildings' structures
and patios or decks.
t III. The applicant shall submit in written and graphic form, a.preponderance
of evidence before the Planning and Environmental Commission tha.t
the proposal is in conformance with the purposes of- the CCI District-
ana ltrat the proposal substantially complies with the VaiI Viilage
. Urban Design Guide PIan.
A. If the applicant is proposing a major change.in the vail village
Urban Oesign Guide p1an, the procedures for ihange are noted in
. Section L8.24.?20 (B) .
IV. The applicant'must also subrnit written and graphic supporting materials
that the proposal substantially conplies with the fol-1or'rinq Urban
Design Coirsiderations section of ttre.Vail Vil.Iage Design Consideration.
,".A. Pedestri-anization
. B. vehicle Penetration
C. StreetscaPe Framework
D. Street Enclosure
E. Street EdgeP. Building Height
G. Views
-H. Sun Shade Consideration
Many of the above items .should'be addressed in some ItraPhic means
usiig such tools as sketches, simulations, models (incl-uding neighboring
buildings) . photos, etc.
V. The Town of VaiI Zoning Code for CCI also describes other zoning issues
that the applicanL must respond to in written or graPhic form.
VI . Applications for exterior alteratj.ons or noclifications in CCI can' are only reviewed semi-annually. They need to be subnitted before
the fourth llonday of May or November. For more specifics on the
review schedule, see Section 18.24.065 A-5
A.
Gorsuch Exterior Alteration
Compliance with Vail Villaqe Desiqn Guidelines
Pedestrianization_. This should be unaffected by ourffireek Drive serves limited vehiiulartraffic end primarily pedestrian traffic.
c.
B.Vehicle Penetration.Not Applicable.
Stggelscape Framework. Additional storefront expansionwrll r'ncrease commercial activity and street life.Clothing apparel and equipment will be displayed in thenew portion of the window added to the southeast sideof the building. We feel that this will definitely addviBual interests to the present streetscape.
Street Enclosure. Awnings are proposed to be installedol/er 6E;;iffi'g and nei wi.ndows along the southeastentry. This is intended to provide a storefront focusto the commercial displays and general faeade.
E.Street Edqe. Decorative
accommodate small pines
planted wooden pots willin front of the east entry
D.
erea. Although paver€ientire south frontageto be coordinated with
inprovements projects
were initially planned along theof the building, this project isthe Town of Veil streetin the near future.
F.Building Height.Not Applicable.
G.Views. Not AppIicable.
Sun,/Shade Canvas.
ehade south facinggains.
Deployable canvas awnings will help
windows from excessive gun and heat
H.
" Gorsuch Exterl.or Alteretion
Adjacent Property 0wnere
n ,rT)f',' r
I. fir. Ted Ven DeWoudeArts Capital Servicee,9 Broadway, 2lst Floor; New York, NY t &
Pepi Gramshammer
Gasthof Gramshammer2]l Eeet Gore Creek DriveVai1, C0 81657
t. l4r. Sam Garyl5 Village Road
Englewood, C0 80110
Lt,
?i.,*T,_,
wb-}^, e!-,
rI c.
*. D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
Date of Application
APPLICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS
OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAI, CORE I (CCI)
APPLICA}TT I S RNPRESENTATIVE
I.This procedure is required for alteration of an existingwhich adds or removes any enclosed floor area or outdoorreplacement of an existing building shall be subject tothe Planning and Environmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted. until all informatj.on is submitted.
A. NA.I!,IE OF APPLICANT
B.
ll ( hn 3vrlo Vn o fr ,aoN, 4'lb-?,xe&
buildinpatio or
review by
eoowss 4Il4 €, 4tL C(aV W, pHoNE ttl[Lw _
NA},IE OF
ADDRESS
NAME 0F 0!'/NER (print or type)
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
UPI+ ".
?,u.
O
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FEE $1oo.oo PAID_.
II{PROVEMENT SURVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWINGOF BUILDING AND ANY IMPROVEMED{TS ON THE
LOCATIONPROPERTY
LAND.
IPJ' "
n'A LIST OF THE NAI{E OF OWNERS OF ALI., PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THESUBJECT pROpERTy and their mailing addresses.
rr' Four (4) copies of a sj-te plan containing the forlowing information:
A. The site plan shalI be drawn on a sheet size of 24', x 36', at a scaleof l" = 20'; a variation of the sheet size or scale may be approvedby the Community Development Department if justified;
/8.
v D.
4.
F.
./C., The existing topographic character of the site including exisbing
and proposed contours. This condition will only be requred for
an eip.nsion area where there is a change of two feet of grade;
Applicatiorrl Exterior Alteration o, lrrr.CCI pege 2
.-
The date, North arrow, scale and name of the proposed development
shall be shown on the site Plan;
The location and size of al,l existi-ng and proposed builclingsr struc-
tures and improvements;
The existing and proposecl landscaping;
The location of all existing and proPosed buildings' structures
and patios or decks.
t rrr.The applicant shall submit in written and graphic form, a preponderance
of eviclence before the Planning and Environmental Commission that
the proposal is in conformance with the purposes of the CCI District-
ana lnal the proposal substantially complies with the Vail Viilage
Urban Design Guide P1an.
A. If the applicant is proposing a major change.in the Vail village
Urban neiign Guide Plan. the procedures for ihange are noted in
Section 18.24.220 (B).
The applicant'must al so submit written and graphic supportinq materials
that lhe proposal substantially cornplies with the fol-lcHing Ulban
Design Consiberations section of the Vail Vilfage Design Consicleraticn.
Ped.estri-anizationVehicle Penetration
Streetscape FrameworkStreet Enclosure
Street Edge'Building Heighr
Views
Sun Shade Consideration
l"lany of the above items .should'be addressed in some graphic means
using sucir tools as sketches, simulations, models (incl-uding neighboring
buildings), photos, etc
V. The Town of Vail Zoning Code for CCI also describes other zoning issues
that the applicant must respond to in written or graphic form.
VI . Applications for cxterior alteratj.ons or moclifications in CCI catr' are only reviewed serni-annually. They need to be submitted beforetbe founth Monday of May or November. For more specifics on thereview schedule, see Section 18.24.065 A-5.
IV.
T
I__
Gordon R. Pierce. Architect. A.I.A.
fm^T@vt,
Mt'At /hrrr'*1 -{" a'c(w- &n a{9/fr9
dantrA st:tft @tu4t turaa d'rQ fuvqof4,w' wffi
7:b"''7ro{ etlafft,q a 4nu// ardp*rp. Yfl
,notoEn-r( //q rf6 4//a lMA fu el
/i; t*' *rq # 4qP T N a"&i €A1
ol:& /r'd,. tue/'d)"f- r/* oi4rftin-CU -/ord
fi' a' nrar ry *ry,f
i AUu rtowrh&v{tu( a'w&ar
, l,/ t- '. // u-,^^'fl r-t ,,//'A /il1r,c t/a,' , M*n i
- ar (.a4rrh.
fu^ruA lfi'e"t/''"t qffi* Wft;Aut ofrdt'%,,,"^j
frna
1000 South Frontage Road West. Vail, Colorado 81657.303/476-6776
I
Planning Staff, McBride Buiiding File
Peter Patten
8/19/85
SUBJECT: Gorsuch zoning question
These are the proposed items for sale in the Gorsuch lower level:
crystal
chi na
POtterY,/hano Painted
cerami cs
dolls
small magazine racks
I amp
embroidered I inensil k flowers
dry flowers
hanci painted clocks
decoys
statues
hand carved plaques
fabric-hand blocked
sma1 'l wooden boxes-hand pai nted
mi rrors
pewter
antique-type furnitur e
I find these to be the.types of items permitted in retair shops in basementlevel in cct as found in-section ie.i+l0z0 aBi: M";;;u"r,-r find that subpara_graph 6 of this section allows i'a,ioit'ionat us6s determineo to be similar topermitted uses...as.long gs lhev d;;;i encourage vehicular traffic.', The storemanager estimates that.only t o-r.z piitiuplatitr6"t"i p"r'ilonttr will be madeas a result of thir,,I:tuir-activiiyi -inbie wirl be abne in Gorsuch,s regularvan, not a large trucK.
I feel this use meets the. intent of the perrnitted use section of the CCI zone9l:l'^l:i 1T,9f9ll 9:':Y:!-t!: iist't-to proceed as planned w'ith the expansionrnto the southeastern basement ar6a.
cc: Dave Gorsuch
Gordon Pierce
TO:
FR0l'l:
DATE:
Subdivision
Lot
8l ock
Fil ing
S,t<'Il (/2
(if applicatrle)
1.
2.
Submittal Items
(A) Topo Hap
(B) Sitc P'lan
(c) utility Plan
(D) Title RePort
(E) Subdivision Agreement
[,Bqi neeri ng Requirements
Source of Utilities
El ectri c
Gas
Sel.rer
lfater
Te'l ePltcr;e
T.V.
(Accepteble) (ltot AccePtable)
(A) Cu'lvert Size
-ilt i ;;i vev,iy- c ra d e T6ffiix)-fA€Can
A
B
c
D
E.
F
4. Cornnents :-.oc lpor'&4,.2t9-c:-
Approved:
Di sa pprot'ed :
DEFffi::"ffi
Eill Alrdrc:.'s
I
TO:
I
MEMOMNDUM
P'lann'ing and Envjronrnental Conmission
FR0M: DePartment of ConrnunitY
DATE: JulY 6, 1983
SUBJECT: Exterjor al teration
APPI icant: Gorsuch '
r. uE__Btqu$l
DuetotheGorsuchSkiShop-operatjontakingovertheentireMcBrjdeBuilding
wjth the exception i?'t[u-[rolk Tower i.i,"ir'ii-p::t:ti], is intended to facelift
the south uno a iitit" oi ttr. west elevations to make the building read as
i *0"" unified retail outlet'
0nthewestfacadetheproposal.istoc]osejntwowindowswithstoneandretain
one djsplay winoow' 0n'thl soutfr siiel [tginning 'ul !h9 western corner' the
proposal i, to ull'" ;;y;;r;;*-"ro iiiroii, ."*oa.l two existins windows'
add another two-siorv biy window, r;;;;-;;a r"iocate.the stairs to the former
citv Ljmits (now'il'ru""l'ri.i"""ni"r i''"pl'"io io-i"tooel the entrance to the
secbnd level of tfr" "Uriiai.! in ttut-utli. Also on this elevation are plans
to remodel *inoo*r-tli'*l'"'"ri"itiue-aispray'ina to treat the facade with
stone .in certain areas'
Theproposala]soincludesbrickpaversonthesouth-sideofthebu.ildingand
new .landscaping. ihus, the p_.oporui'ii g;.""ifiy a tacel ift of the building
to al'low it to ieao"ai'u-uniii"h itt"i'it"tliia'ining related retail busjnesses'
Devel opment
request for the McBrjde Building in Vail Village'
Ltd.
o
II.VAIL VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDEMTIOry!
A. l!!!!I8.14!"LZITION
Thetrafficpatternsofpedestrianswjl]notbeaffectedbytheproposal.
However, ti'e pedlsiiiin Eiperien." riiorja be improved-with the brick paver
treatmentand landscap.ing additionr.' Rito, benci'res will cont'inue to be
orovided as rest.ing or waiting u"uu, on-ine iouth side of the building'
VEHICLE PENETRATION
The proposal may actually reduce. the number of vehicl'es entering and perking
on the southeast.";;;;'tr;-io-ir," ionu;;;;"; from citv L..imits to a ski-
rental shop. netiver! una-..iut" pjct-upi'may Ue reduced due to thj s change
.in use and due to tn.'ptopotEa-io*'puitgf io ii'q.northeast^of the building'
The servjce a.ltey on't[""!;;;-ti;;'oi tl'r" building remains undisturbed'
B.
1
i
:
()
MCBRTDE BLDb-2- 7/6/83
C. STREETSCAPT FRAMEI,{ORK
The various improvements descrjbed above
framework along Gore Creek Drive.
STRTET ENCLOSURE
should improve the streetscape
Street enc'l osure is unaffected.
STREET ED6E
F.
Street edge is also unaffected.
BUILDING HEIGHT
The proposal does not change bui'l ding height.
VIEI.IS
No view corridors are affected by the proposal
SERVICE AND DELIVERY
III. ZONING CODE ITTMS
The proposal meets the zoning code requirements for Cormerc'ial Core I.
D.
D.
G.
t{
As stated above, the number of vehicle trips to this building cou'l d be
reduced wjth the change from City Lirnits to ski renia'ls. As the PEC knows'
the staff has advanced the installment of common trash compactors in the
core to reduce vehicle trips required for pick-up and to centralize and
enclose trash faciljties (by use of compactors with building enc'l osures).
The McBrjde Building wi'l I be required to participate in the new compactor
facility proposed for the existing dumpster location to the rear of the
buildin!,' Wb feel thjs will be an improvement in the serv'ice and delivery
to th'is building and to the others it will serve. There will be an organi-
zational meeting concerning part'icipation jn the compactor on Wednesday'
July 13.
I. SUN/SHADE
Thjs will not change as a resu'l t of the project,
a.
-l
Mc BRrDE BLDG -rltut
iv. sratF !EEquuE!!4IL0N
The Department of Community Development reconmends approva'l of th'is proposal.
i"" if'[-lrieiiae euii;ing. -t^te ure bf the opinion that these changes wjll add
to the attractiveneii'oi tn. bui'lding anA ivt'tl enhance the pedestrian experience
along Gore Creek Drive
Conditions of approval are as fol'l ows:
'l . The owner of the building agrees to participate jn and not remonstrate
igi;nii a mini-special iilprovement district'if and when formed by lower
aiidge Street for the purpose of installing brick pavers.
2. The'l essees of the building agree to participate in (to thejr fa'ir share
dg;r;;i-ih; io*ron compact5r iacil ity'constrlction and ma'intenance and
ongoing normal fees.
.O
75 south frontage road
Yail, coloredo 81657
(303) 476-7000 otflce ol communlty deyelopmenl
November 9, 1987
Mr. Roger Riggert
Clock Tower Restaurant
232 Eridge Street
Vai1, Colorado 8.|657
Re: Design Review Board Fee for the Clock Tower Renodel , 1gg7
Dear Roger:
I am writing this letter to inform you that I made a mistake'in ca'l culating your Design Review fie for the entry remodel toyour restaurant. You were charged $500 for the Delign ReviewBoard fee. You should have only been charged $50. i am verysorry for this mjstake. Attached to this ietter is thereimbursement for the error.
lf yoy have any further questions about this issue, please feelfree to contact me.
SincerelyTl ,r./. I ll I
nr,lton'tifl
Kristan Pritz
Town Planner
KP: br
Encl osure
luwn
75 soulh fronlage road
Yail. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 olflce of communlty deyelopment
October 14, L987
l{r. Roger RiggertClock Tower Restaurant
232 Bridge StreetVail . Colorado 81657
Re: Improvement Survey for the Clock Tower Deck
Dear Roger:
r am concerned that an improvement survey for the deck has notbeen submitted. r am requesting that you abide by our originalunderstanding that was stated in severil previous- letters indcomprete the inprovement survey. r will appreciate your pronptattention to this matter. trrant< you for y-oirr cooperltion-. rwoul-d also tike to add that I think the reurodel l-ookswonderful !
Sincerely,
| /l I
| ), I 1 i t
N\ftIvl{im=,Kristan Prit}'
Town Planner
KP:br
cci Joe Norris
75 south lrontage roed
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 oftlce ol communlly developmenl
May Z, L9g7
Mr. Roger RiggertClock Tower Restaurant
232 Bridge StreetVail , Col-orado 81652
RE: Clock Tower Building permit
Dear Roger,
Thank you.for providing the drawings that indicate the proposedand existing seating airangement for the clock rower Restaurant.According to these drawingi, there is not an increase in seatsfor the restaurant. tne fiaitcing requir"*".ri ior-restaurantspaces reads:
Section l_8.52.100 parking Requirement Schedule L.0space per each-eight seats, based on seating capacityor Building Code Occupancy standards which ever ismore restrictive.
giygl .these_requirements, your parking fee nrill be based onDurrcrrng code occuparcy which is the most restrictive approach.The Clock. Tower parking fee wilt be caLcutated by dividi;; i;;-33 sq. f!. Uy Ls sq. ft. and then dividing tna-'arnount bi sseats. (The t_5 sq. ft. is equal to the fuiiaing code occuiancystandard for one person.) fne parking reguireient is .28spaces.
As this project is in the Comrnercial Core f zone district, you
I?l]19-h":: i Pillile ree or $84o.00. rhis ree is calcuratla ryEaKrng .28 x 3000 dollars.(cost of a comrnerical parking spacel '
4ti.!.equars g84o.oo. rhii fee may be paid in b'instalr.ments.The first instalrment (916g.oo) mu;t be paid when you pi"x "pyour buirding permit- you may arso pay the fee in-one-r-urnp 3um.
An inprovement survey wlrl also be necessary after the concreteis poured for the foundation. This witl privide the staff withan accurate drawing that nill indicate the aeck area which willbe used for the lease agreenent for the d,eck on Town of Vailproperty.
If yog have_any questions about these reguirements, please feelfree to call me.
sinc€rely,
Ki,l*3,h.'
Kristan Prltz
Town Planner
Jrr
o
*
N;
R€
\
\:r
\
"--R
.\
\)sU
E
E
H;
H
EN
H
t
-
.-L,-"]-.
-
E
EI
h
.g
s
-\
\ra
-s
E
E
i.Is EH
\$
*\\jR$
\)$
i\\J
\
t'
-1\
--{<'
S\)
-r-:E EEH
H
E EI EEr'
o
Vai'l , Colorad.
promise to pay to the order
Director, Municipal Buil ding
of ten percent per annum on the unpaid ba'l ance, payable in yearly
as follows:
o
$ Total $840.00
Clock Tower Remodel Spring
In installmsnl5 sffsy date,
of the Tor'm o.f Vail at the
at Vai'l Co] orado -
0ne Hundred & Sixtv Eiqht
with interest
instal I ments
The first installment
the second .installnent
tie third installment
the fourth installment
with the entire unpaid
1987
for value received, I
0ffice of the Finance
l9
of $__?13-gg_
of $?l_3_._89._
of $__?l_3._99_
of $ l_l_3._99._
bal ance
due and
due and
due and
due and
payabl e
payabl e
payabl e
payabl e
on
on
on
on
ti ts nenErD that if this note'is not paid when due or declur"a iu",n"r"rno"r,
the principal and accrued interest thereon shall draw interest at the rate ot
18 plrbent'per annum, and that fai'lure to make any payment of principal or interest
wheir aue or any detault under.any incunbrance or agreement securing this note
iniff.iri" th! whole note to belome due at once, or the interest to be counted
as principal , at the option of the ho] der of the note.. The nakers and endorsers
herLof severilly waive presentment for payment, protest, notice on nonpayment
and'of protest, and agree to any extension of time of payment and partial payments
befoie,'at or ifter niturity, aia it this note or interest thereon is not paid
when due,:or suit is brought, agree to pay all reasonab'l e costs of collection'
including reasonable attorney's fees.
Roger Riggert
DATE.
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
Comrnents:
INTER-OEPARTMENTAL REVI Et.I
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date
ft\ L^t^) ol"'"\ til'\\ P.oI'
A"l' Mo.t^nq1co^o^ns -utc)
(o", / /"*
. y'ou / 5 .17 y'(gtr't(-t
I _^L\L.k.4 nJ "'li.f, .> b\'//;a^rei* e $q[ft
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
Date
POLICE OEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments: .
Date
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Corments:
Date
CLOCKTOI'JER RESTAURAJ'IT & ENTRY REMODEL
MAY 8, 1987
lst FL00R = 160 s.f.
2nd FL00R = 78 s.f-
lst FL00R REST. BAY I.IINDO,I = 33 s.f.
T0TAL 271 s.f.
RECREATION FEE:
PARKING FEE:
NEhl RESTAUMNT SPACE = 33 s.f.
PARKING REQD. = .28 spaces
PARKING FEE = .28 x $3,000 = $840.00
27I s.f. x 1.00 = $271.00
New Restaurant Square Footage = 33 s.f.
Parking Required = .28 spaces
Parking Fee = .28 x $3,000 = $840.00
CLOCKTOhIER REI'IODEL
MAY I, 1987
Typed May 8, 1987
PRESENT
DTlil-Donovan
Peggy 0sterfoss
Duane Piper
Sid Schultz
ABSENTBFn XoUUs
Pan Hopkins
The meeting was ca'l led to order by the chairman, Duane Piper.
uest for a conditional use ermi t
on ast Gore Creet Gore Cree Dr
Tom Braun made the staff presentation.
a wrought iron fence to be constructed
south side of Cafe Gorsuch. The staff
addition to the streetscape. Approval
stjpulated in the memo.
The diryi,ng deck was to
at the bdge of existing
recommended approval asis contingent upon the
PLANNING AND
I
{
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMI SSION
June 9, 1986
STAFF PRESENT
Flter Fffi
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Rick Pylman
cant: Dave and
at
Curt Segerberg represented the appl icant and asked for questions. She.i ka
Gramshammer was against the proposal , stating that tables would crowd the
loading on Gore Creek Drive and would create a dangerous sjtuation forpedestri ans. she mentioned that the cheese shop has wanted to put tables outin fnont of here shop for a long time and it would be unfair to allow Gorsuchthe privilege to use TOV land for business purposes without allowing theprivilege to other businesses.
Sid Schultz asked about the nearest loading zone and the dimensions of Gore
Creek Drive and suggested that the restaurant association should come in as agroup so each restaurant has the chance to request this additional space. Hefelt the need for guidelines as to who gets a dining deck. He also felt thatthe Town should be reimbursed for the use of TOV land.
Diana Donovan stated that she has never supported decks on TOv land. She feltthat this deck did not look like it belonged there, looked temporary and
blocked the display windows. Jim viele had mixed feelings about the deck. He
had a concern about traffic and stated that they would have to rely upon Public
Works and the Fire Department to review this aspect. He felt the issue would
be precedent setting. Viele also felt the deck would add a lot of street lifeto Gore Creek Drive in this area. He wished that there had been trees planted
along the A & D Building to improve that sjde of the street. Viele felt that
decks should be looked at on a case by case basis and pointed out that this wasa seasonal deck, and not a permanent structure.
Peggy Osterfoss said that the Town needs to come up with a policy because the
decision wou'l d be precedent setting--others will want cafe areas. She feltthat the Town Council needed to set a policy.
dr"' ,-4*
er to establ i sh utdoor
orsuc
be de1ineated by
pavers on theit is a oositive
four conditions
Duane Piper felt that decks have been approved on TOv property before and thatthis would not be precedent setting. He felt that aesthetically the deck was
needed in this area. Piper stated that sometimes it was important to look
leyond straight requirements for 40 foot public right-of-way and property
lines.
Peter Patten stated that j t was necessary to I ook at the street as a tota'lpedestrian walkway. If safety were being jeopardized the staff would be
concerned and would probably not recommend approval , He said the staff feltthat this portion of Gore creek Drive needed more street activity and'l jfe.
The southeast corner of Gorsuch has helped greatly to bring pedeltrians to theeast to the Mi'l I Creek Court Building. Patten added that the Councjl has notsaid no to these requests in the past. Perhaps there were a few that were
denied due to obvious problems. He fe'l t that it would only be precedentsetting jn that it is in a public right-of-way.
Piper stated that the decision could be left to the Councjl who could determine
whether or not it was precedent setting. Osterfoss asked about the timeperi ods of the leases and rom answered that normally the'l eases run one year.
Donovan asked what Gonsuch had given the Town in return and was told pavers,
trees and a public bench. Donovan felt the deck looks very temporary and addedon. She questioned crowding of the street during the Coors Classic. Curt saidthe fence could be removed during spec.ial events.
Gramshammer said that she had ca'l 'l ed the Liquor Board and found out that thearea of service must be separated from the street by a level or type ofplatform, the railing must be permanent and it was not feasible to'separate'l iquor and food service. Piper stated that the licensing for Iiquor is outsideof the realm of this board.
Vie] e Tovgd, afrC Pipgr seconded to approve for one year the conditional use
1. The Town Council shall formal 1y review and approve the application.2. A forma'l lease agreement shal 1 be signed by the applicant and the Town
Counc iI .3. The operation of the deck is for the summer months only. If theapplicant proposed to use this deck in the winter, jt wil'l require staffreview and approval . Establishing the actual dates of operation will be
made by the applicant and the Councjl dur.i ng the review of the lease
agreement.4. The applicant agrees to comply with those days that the operation of the
deck will be restricted as established by the Town counci'l and these
dates wil'l be incorporated into the lease agreement.
should look at planters thatsite.
Donovan voted in favor because of the
by adding pavers and trees. She felt the DRB
are removable to add further landscaping to the
-v-,lt
MI NUTES
VAIL TOt'lN COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 1, 1986
7:30 p.m.
A regular meetjng of the Vail Town
7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Council was held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, at
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT:
Paul Johnston, Mayor
Kent Rose, Mayor Pro Tem
Dan Corcoran
Gai I Wahrl ich-Lowenthal
Hermann Staufer
Eric Affeldt
Gordon Pierce
Ron Phi l1 ips, Town Manager
Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Town Cierk
The first'item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1986, first reading,
regarding the annexatjon of the So] ar Crest area of llest Vail jnto the Town of Vajl
and amendjng the zoning map in reETlon _ahe annexed property. Mayor Johnston
read the full tjtle. Rick Pylman explained the ordinance and the zoning changesproposed. After a short discussion by Council, Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal made a' motion to approve the ordinance, and Hermann Staufer seconded. A vote tvas taken and
the motion passed unanimously 5-0.
The next item on the agenda was 0rdinance No. 17, Seri es of 1986, first readjng, an
ordinance defining when a dog constitutes a nuisance and expanding the areas of the
leash 'law. Larry Eskwith gave background jnformation. He also noted a correctjonin Section 4, 1ine 6, which read "... or any athletic event ..." to "... whjle anyathletic event...". After a discussjon, Hermann Staufer made a motion to approve
the ordinance. Dan Corcoran seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously 5-0.
The thjrd item on the agenda was the appeal of the PEC decision approving thejafe '-Gorsuchieck. Tom Braun detailed background information and listbd the irjterJiTfi'e-TEC-uSa-Tb make their decision. There was no representative present for the
appeaiing party. There was no discussion by the Council or pub'l ic. A motion was
made to uphold the PEC decisjon by Kent Rose, which was seconded by Gail Wahr'l jch-
Lowenthal . A vote was taken and the motion passed unan.imousiy 5'0.
The fourth item was an appeai of the PEC decision denying a GRFA variance request of
a Bjghorn Terragg residence. Kri stan Pritz gave background information on the--Tffiea1 . 3im-eoylDgave his reasons why the ippeal should be approved. There was a
lengthy djEEuSST-on by Counc'i I, Peter Patten, Krjstan Pritz and Tim Boy1e. Dan
Corcoran made a motion to uphold the PEC decision, and Hermann Staufer seconded.
Djana Donovan gave comments on the appea'l . A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously 5-0.
The fifth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 18, Series of 1986, supporting the
Town of Va'i 1 request to the State Division of Highways to reduce the speed limjt on
the South Frontage Road. Tom Braun exp'l ained the reasoning behind the resolution.After some discussion by Council to extend the 25 m.p.h. speed zone from the
intersection of Vajl Road and the South Frontage Road easter'ly to the area of the
Ford Park tennis course and reduce the speed limit to 35 m.p.h. from the Ford Park
tennis courts to Vail Valley Drive, with the 45 m.p.h. zone east of VaiI Va1 1ey
Drive maintajned as presently existing, Dan Corcoran made a motion to approve the
resolut'i on with the changes discussed. Kent Rose seconded. A vote was taken'and
the motion oassed unanimously 5-0.
The next item on the agenda was consideration of an air rights easement for CascadeVillage chajrlift. Tom Braun gave a brief overview of the request for easerienTsince it had been discussed at the l,lork Session that aftennoon: he also mentioned
changes had been made whjch Council had requested. Dan Corcoran suggested'l abelingthe three Exhibit A's for reference identity. Larry Eskwith suggesled there be aterm peri od jn case the Forest Service did not approve the requeit; Councjl decidedto make the easement effective upon Forest Service approval within eighteen (18)
.T
Project Applicatlon
Date
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and Phone
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architecl, Address and Phone:
Legal Descriplion: Lot
Comments;
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
, APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Town, Planner E statt Approvat
75 3outh |ronlag€ .o.d
vlil, color.do 8165t
(303) {76-7000
September 26, 1985
Dave Gorsuch
263 East core Creek DriveVail, Colorado 81.657
Re3 Gorsuch Planter Enclosure
Dear Dave:
Aa f am sure you are aware, your planter encLosure receivedPlanning Commission approval on september 23rd. As was agreed by
Renee, a condition of the approval was to do the on-grade pavertreatment that was originally proposed in 1983r as rrell as threeof the most westerly trees proposed with that plan. In lookingat the property linesr it appears that these three trees can beinstalled on your property. This would seemingly eliminate theobstacle with the Public tf,orks Department and their objections totrees planted on the town right-of-way. It should be mentioned,howeverr that you may well be responsible for cLearing snow fromthe area around these new trees.
We have scheduled your remodel for the October 2nd Design Review
Board meeting. At this tirne we should include as a part of thissubnittalr the paverg and trees that were originally a part ofthe 1983 Planning Commission submittal.. In additionr the specifictype of paver to be used as \^reLl aa the type of tree and sizeshould be determined. In the interirnr we will notify the Public
Works Department of this new development.
Please do not hesitate to call me with any questiona you may have.
We are excited to see these streetscape improvements being donein conjunction with your emall building expansion. Ihanks foryour efforts to improve the landscaping in thig area of the
Vi1lage.
Sincerely r
Thomas A. Braun
a f
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
DRB APPLICATION
*****THIS APPTICATION IIILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS SUBI,IITTEO*****
I. PRE.APPLICATIOI{ MEETING:
A pre-appllcation nl99t1ng with_a planning staff member is strongly suggested to
9:9!Till 1f any additional inforhation is neeaed. No applicatio-n wiii be-iccepted
Yll::s^!t is complete (must include all items required Uy'ttre zoning administraior).. tE-'ls.the applicant's responsibility to make an appointmlnt with th6 staff to findout about additional submittal requirements. Pleiie note that a C0MPLETE applica-tion will streamline the_approval'process for you"-project ui aecreasing-th! numberof conditions of approval .lhat the'DRB may sti-puiati.--nrr c6na'iilons oi ifprovat mustbe resolved before'i Uuitalng permit is iisued.
8. LoCATIoT{ 0F
Address
Legal Oescriptisn Lot
Zoning
C. I{AI.IE OF APPLICANT:
Mdress
Block Filing
telephone J?.-e
terephone 416-E7b
D. Mf,tE OF AppLrcANT's REPRESENTAT:.UI, aOrhnYl4,rct.
Address
E. MIIE OF OI'INERS:
Signature
Address
F. DRB FEE: The fee will be paid at the tlme a building permit is requested.
VALUATION FEE
II.IPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUB!4ISSIONS TO THE DRB:
M+
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$ s0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
$ o-$ lo,ooo
$10,001 -$ 50,000
$:.50,001 - $ 150.000
$tso,g61 - $ ,5oo,ooo
$500,001 - $l,ooo,ooo$ 0ver $t,ooo,ooo
t.In additlon to meet'ing submittal requirements, the applicant mustto indicate property lines and building corners. Trees that will
should also be marked. This work must-be completed before the DRB
sl te.
2. The review-process for NEtl BUILDINGS will normally involve two separate meetingsof the Deslgn Revlew Board. so plan on at least two meetings for thelr approval.
3. People who fail to appear before the Design Review Board at their scheduled
meeting and who have not asked for a postponement will be required to be
republ I shed .
stake the site
be removed
visits the
1..
a
4. The following ltems no longer have to be presented to the Design Review Board.
They, horever, have to be presented to the Zonlng Administrator for approval:
a. l{lndows, skylights and slmi'lar exterior changes that do not a'lter the
existing plane of the buildlng; and
. b. Building additions that are not viewed from any other lot or public space,
which have had letters submitted from adjoining property owners approving. the additioni and/or approval from the agent for, or manager of a condominium
assoclation.
5. You nay be required to conduct Natural Hazard Studies on your property. You should
check with a Town Planner before proceeding.
LIST OF MATERIALS
NAl,lE 0F PROJECT:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
STREET ADDRESS:
OESCRIPTION OF
The fol'lowing information is requ'ired for subm'ittal by the applicant to the Design Revien
Board before a final approval can be fiven:
A. BUILDING IIATERIALS: TYPE 0F MATERIAL C0L0R
Roof
' Siding
Other blall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
tli ndows
llindol Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Ratls
Flues
Flashings..
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
B. LANDSCAPING: Name
PLANT MTERIALS:
PROPOSEO TREES
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REI{OVED
of Designer:
Phone:
Botanical Name Conmon Name Qganl ty Si ze*
*lndlcate caliper for deciducious trees. Indicate height for conifers'
' PLANT I,IATERIALS:
(con't)
SHRUBS
EXISTII{G SHRUBS
TO BE REI'IOVED
Botanical Name Cormon Name
Type
a
Quani ty Si ze
Square Footaqe
GROUNO COVERS
s0D
SEEO
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
c.oTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa]1s, fences, swimming pools'etc.) Please specifY.
/PEC 7 /11/83
a
pjerce wondered vrhy they could not put vrindows jn the bqg,t:lop. .corco1a1 f9]1Piefce wonoereo v/nV Engy coulu lluL iJuL v'l llruLiws lrl LrrE rJLrv r' JrrvH' "" '"''.
tliit"irr"-ufinl wuil "iinot acceptable. Trout agreed with Pierce's remarks and
wanted to see specific drawings, He asked the appli.cant'if he wanted to table
hic y'onrraq't. Fi<her rpn'l icd ihat since the site had been vis jted by the boardhis request. Fisher rep'l 'ied that since the site y the boa
tqd--a!-!s--DBE 'ltbjsh
-b-
,
*"*Uuid, that the request be passed. More discussion fo1 lowed concerning-the
piunleii and Corcorari stateO tnat ttre DRB could address the question of p1}n!:rs.
Fjsner asked the board to approve the request for alteration whether or not tne
wall became totally transpaient, with suggestions sent to DRB-
B.McBride Buildin - Gorsu Ltd:Facade and brjck paver treatments, redesign
Ant
-.l\r-l:-.-
pey'er pilten itatea that this was a remodel of two facades, that Gorsuch, Ltd.
was taking over the entire McBride Bu'ilding with the exception of the Clock Tower
Inn, ind ih" fo"mer City Limjts was now to-be a ski rental shop. He-showed site
and'floo" plan changes ind e'l evations, adding that new pavers were also proposed
on the south s'ide of the building with new landscaping.
Gordon Pierce, architect for the buildjng, stated that there were no ma3o".chang"s
in ttre Uuitaing, merely revisions to allow people to flow more easily wi-th]n
spaces, Corcoiin wondired if Gorsuch had any problems with the Znd condition'
that of part'icipatjnq in the cost of a com'noi bompactor facilitv, and Gorsuch,
iJpii*O [[ii titi-t'ia rdo proniemi-with either of thb conditlons. Patten said that
thbre would be a meeting of all persons jnvolved with a common compactor that week.
Jack Curtin in the audience conrnended the archjtect for his des-ig1 in upgrading
Itre Uuitaing. tii*le agr"ud with Jack. Piper wondered why one balcony lvas remaining
so'l id when ihe Design Guide Considerations mentjon the suggested transparency
of balconies. Pierie answered that because there would be transparency below
it with the sky light, he felt it would be a good contrast'
Piper suggested that where there was a ,|2" drop it woul.d be a good place for a.
moi^e perfrineni planter, and noted that the bu'il.ding had mostly plants in containers.
Piercb answered'that this part of the street edge was on TOV property, but that
they would prefer something more permanent and wou'l d investigate,the subiect'
Dav! Gorsuch, applicant, stated that many trees and p1 ants were destroyed by
drunks as they t.ft tnu buiiding at hlght. Peter Patien explained that Bill
Andrews, town"engineei, wanted ie*poraiy planters so that they could.be removed
fOr snow removalI Donovan had reservations. about un'ifying the whole street'
ana give as i negativ; gi;mpia the Slifer-Ore House buijding. Piper,pointed.out
that-thjs bujldjng had some'factors which broke up the appearance and did not
appear to be massive.
Trout pointed out that the TQV't and was owned by the people and encouraged
the usb of permanent planters. He also was conlerned that the stone jn the stone
wall be a gbod choice'and not be too high. He said tla! lre wou'ld miss seeing
ihe hats ii tfre window jf the window weie removed, and felt that the building
did not look'like one big builJing. Corcoran stated that he had seen rnany appl.icants
.a o Prc 7/1t3 -6-
who ask to recejve more than they give to the Town with re'l atjon to.f1 oor area'
dtc., and that this project was not one of them.
Vie'le moved and Donovan seconded to approvg tlle requeg!,with the S9lCjU-qn!---..:..1---....i-...---_-.ias tne srarr requesr ierc-e-;nd-6mFql
abstaining.
C. Gore Creek Pl,aza Bu j ;ffi's Beaner
Sweet Basil:
Peter Jamar showed the pl ans and suggested that the optirnum situation would
b;-i" h;; the;bility !o enctose t66 area during the winter months while keeping
as much transparency is possible and total'ly eliminating the enclosure during
the summer months,
Robin Molny, archjtect for the project,_exp'lained that when l"Yins !9 lelisnthe enclosure he tried to remove the walls for the summer' but the p'itcheo
roof made it d'ifficult. He explained that the Fire Department had wanted the
fire exit changed, and that was the reason for the wal kways. He felt
that there would be no prob'l em in opening up the east end., but because
of the icy conditions, could not remove ihe'roof. He added that no doubt the
encloied ieck would reduce the open deck impact, but there would be more people
observed din'ing on the deck tn early spring and late fall. He felt the masses that
cupently exjsi were not attractive, ahd by bring'ing the second floor forward'
the builiing wou'ld be perceived as i two siory rittrer than a five story building.
Kevin Clair, owner of Sweet Basjl , stated that in terms of v'isual impact'.75%
of ttre bu'ild'ing would be open (ttr6 north side). He said that because of the
ice problem, tiey d'id not tonsjaer a removab'le roof. He said that.the.qqlio
ii-ohty-usuiOfe--for 90 days i year from the middle of June through the middle
of Sepiember, because jt ioesn-'t get sun, and then o-ften. lunch can be Served
but nbt dinn6r. Also, because of rain tie djners often have to move insjde.
He stated that in the winter he does not have enough seating capac'ity.
Pjerce fe1t jt would be good if the Fire Department could fjnd another way
to-gei people off of the-building. Molny baid the F.D..asked them to combine
their siaii^s with ttre-UJtiaing n6xt door-, and that they did investigate a spiral
sta i rway.
Jack Curtin in the audience, said that encloiing a ba'l cony or deck for w'inter
ina tnen removing the windows in the summer did-not work, and gave the.Red.
ijon as an exampie. The Red Lion looked attractive, but was a g'iant microphone'
wtriitr amptjfied'even quiet conversations. He suggested that perhaps better
maintenance would solve the ice problem. He also-suggested a canopy.and gas
heaters. He stated that at the Lodge 'in early May, canopies ancl neaters maoe
the patio useable even in rainy and-cool weather.- Curtin added that everything
in-Llontt"ia-ii Jnitosed and tfiat this particular deck was critical, because
next Las Mananitas would ask to enclose their deck.
:
l2:00
'l:45
2:00
pm
pm
pm
o
Planning and Environmental Corm'ission
July ll, '1983
Site lnspections
Discussion of pedicab company
Publ jc Hearing
Approval of mjnutes of meeting of June 27.
t. Request for a conditional use permit for a day care facility on lot 34,
Buffehr Creek Subdivision. Applicants: Mike and Debbie Dawson
Request for an amendment to Sections '18.04.030,18.22,090,.and 18.24.130 in
order to increase the number of accommodation units allowed in the Commercial
Core I and the Public Acconmodation zone districts. Applicant: Lodge
Properties, Inc.
Request to amend Section .|8.64, Nonconforming 5ites,-Uses, Structures and
Sii,e Improvements, to'incl ude'l anguage which will allow for interior expansion
of pre-ex'ist'ing legal non-conforming uses for additional Gross Residential
F'loor Area, Applicant: Richard S. Baldwin
Request for a conditjona'l use permit to construct a water collection system
in'Gore Creek inmed'iately below the effluent discharge po'int of the sewer
treatment p1ant, and between the Glen Lyon office bui'l ding and the Chevron
service station. Applicants: Vail Assocjates, Inc.
5. Request for a conditional use permit to place a popcorn wagon in the Vail
Inn Plaza, Special Development District No. 6. Applicant: Van Ewing
6. Requests for exterior alterations or modifications for the following buildings:
A. Plaza Lodge - Christy Sports: Enclosure of space on eastern side of
Pioneer Pl aza .
B, McBride Bujlding - (Gorsuch, Ltd): Facade and brick paver treatments,
redesign of entryways.
C. Gore Creek P1 aza Building: Enclosure of north side outdoor decks for
Sweet Basil and Blu's Beanery.
2.
?
4.
PEC 3/83 -7-
8., Reques! !q qnen4_!p_es. coiblex,-to-ad-il odfsT ing
Oick Ryan explained that if the amendment is approved by the Planning and Environ-
mental Conmission, and then by the Town Council , the app'l icant will have to
come back with a request for a conditional use permit for a specific use. He
added that the staff felt that a certajn amount of vending added to the streetlife in Vail , and was in favor of it when it wasn't in conflict with other uses.
Van Ewing said that he had the support of the surrounding shops. Trout said he
had thought this was illegal in the Tovrn of Vajl. Dick explained that this would
be reviewed on a case by case basis. Diana wanted to know what contro'l s the Town
had over the other popcorn vlagons, and Ryan replied that the agreement with the
Town jncluded control of trash, type of menus, et€. Donovan felt that a popcorn
wagon would be good, but how cou'l d the town control vending of baked goods, ice
cream, etc., and she felt that criteria should be listed. Ryan described how
this was handled in the Boulder ma] l: Certain areas were set aside for certain
types of vend'ing with oniy one year leases. Donovan felt vending was a gold mine
because the owner would not have to pay rent, and she would support the popcorn
wagon, but not much else. Viel e shared Donovan.'s concern, and he anticipated an
expansion of this type of conditional use jnto other districts besides SDD6.
Ryan admitted that he had received 4 or 5 other requests for various types of
vending inc'l uding a 1ow frequency radio station for skiers.
Corcoran stated that under conditional use perm'its, on'ly a few criteria had to
be met, so if an applicant met the criterja, the PEC would have to grant the request.
Minor Major
6/1
o
-l
Van Ewing suggested changing h'is request to a specific use, and Trout wondered
if there would be anything wrong with that. Trout moved and Viele seconded to
glprove the request to ha popcorn vending wqgon to conform in appearancewftn-ffivoEe ns-IFTsEo --
Council.
9. Request for a minor subdivjsion for'lots'l 5 and'l 6, Buffehr Creek.
App'licants: Randy Guerriero and Angela Leighton
Peter Patten explained that this was a mjnor subdivision and that there were two
condjtions of ailproval . Randy Guerriero, one of the app'l icants, stated that his
plans did include cleaning up the parking 1ot. Patten added that he had a jetter
from a survey company which indicated that this was an equal trade-off.
'Trout nroved and Vie'l e seconded to aDDrove the request with the words, "the'l ot"
". .he vottwas T':0-Tn-TeTor' -
10. Brel,imilaly fgview of exterior moin the fol I owinq-tesignfrions:
+f;;i$ipo,"t,
Purcel I 's
Lod.ge at Vail
A & D Building
Lionshead Arcade
Villaqe Center
Sweet Basil and 81u's Beanery
o
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
May 23, I9B3
PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Dan Corcoran
Diana Donovan
Jim l'lorgan
Duane Piper
tli'l'l Trout
Jim Viele
ABSENT
Gordon Pierce
The meeting was ca1 lsd to order at 3:00 pm by the chairman, Dan Corcoran, fo1 lowing
site jnspections,
'l . Approva'l of minutes of meetinq of May 9.
Donovan moved and Viele seconded to approve the minutes as written. The vote. was
4 in favor, none against, with Piper abstaininq.
2, Appo'intment of PEC member to DRB.
Duane Piper was appointed to represent the PEC at the DRB meetings for June, July
and August.
3. Request for rezoning from B_?/S to HDMF on lot l, Block 6, Intermountain to
;
Peter Patten showed a site plan and explained the information in the memo. Jay
Peterson, represent'ing the applicants, stated that the project could not use a
tax exempt bond process, and djd not want to get locked in to a specific interestrate. He explained that interest rates fluctuate. He added that the GRFA was
approximate, that it could be 200 square'feet more, and would like the f1 exibility
of approval of up to 3500 square feet. Also the applicant wanted the $85/squarefoot to be the average price because studios cost more per square foot than Iargerunits. He added tfiET-units A & D were njcer units so could command more money.
Peterson stressed that the total seliino price would not change, Peterson stated
that the membership to the Tennjs court; irould be mandatory, ind in three years
the fee would increase to $'15.00 and after that would be determined by the CPI.
Chuck 0g'i 'lby discussed a poss'ible financing arrangement whereby the mortgage payments
gradua'l ly increase for five years, and then level off, Patten expla'ined that the
staff had done research on prices in Vail and $g$75q ft was below the market rates
now. He added that only Matterhorn was less. Morgan asked if the applicant wanted
to change the proposed GRFA to 3500 sq ft, and Jay answered that tha! would be
very close, and when the p'l ans were finalized, they could fluctuate I200 sq ft,
but wou'ld be 3500 sq feet maximum. 0gi1by agreed. Patten suggested that if the
tota'l 6RFA were to be 3500, the maximum sales price would be $297,500.
Y?
Peter Patten
Jim Sayre
Betsy Rosolack
t PEC 5/23/83o -2-
wondered if
0g'i1 by. statedtraffic on
be a problem,
Peterson suggested restricting the number of units allowed when rezoning. Morgan
wanted to make the maximum GRFA 3500, and was concerned with the large iarcel icrossthe road. He felt lt'll with.this precedent. they would want nore deisity whichwould affect the neighborhood. Coi'coran pointed-out thai ih"ru "as no one therefrom the nei.ghborhood.to oppose the proposal , but that a larger project may havemore respondents. Patten said that he did meet with owners iho "epiesentei theBellflower Condominiums who did have concerns about increaied acti!,iiy, ino tt'athe.encouraged them. to pgt their concerns in letter torm (wtricn they 6-ii not do),and also from one westridge condo owner who also was nod at-the m6etlng. - -'
Viele wondered if there were qny way to prevent these condos from becoming rental
I!lt?l and Jay.answered that jt would be'best for the developer to build ind sell,but lf the units did not se1l, the developer wou'ld 1ike to bb able to rent'longterm. Patten reminded the board that the'proposal being considered concerned -
sales only. To-Viele's questions concerning tinancing,"peierson replied that theywou]d use normal financing, possibly with a graduaiing'raie sucn as used at pitki;t
9rySf lutl... pjpg" questioned zoning change [o HDMF rithe" than sDD, and pattenreplied that with an SDD there still had to be an underlying distriit, which wouldbe HDMF.
Piper was concerned about taking a zone and changing it. He was also concernedabout-the design of the structuie, Patten statei tfrat the site coverage inO in"height would remain the same if approved, but the design would be handied in DRB.Piper wondered if on-site parking'had be6n studied, ind peie"jon
"epiiea-tfrit-lodo so the structure would have to be torn down and construction sta;ted again fromthe beginning. Piper did not I ike the idea oi triving ii uiir, down a street toget-to-the off-site parking, and wondered if there wis room for a sjdewalk. peterson
replied that it would have to be along the right-of-way next to the road.
Discussion continued about financing. Peterson explained that interest rates werenot tied to the amount.of down paym6nt, and also elplained that the pointi-woriaqt9!lbl{ be.2*.to.3,points totat.- Donovan asked it 0gi1by had to jrasr on tiieinterest rate that he received. Peterson exp'l ained ttral ttr! construction ]oanfloated with the prime, but that the long term financing did not.
Donovan was a'l so concerned with the sidewalk or pedestrian way, andthere was a bike path in the area. patten said that there wasn,t.that since the new bridge had been built to the east, there was lessthis end of Intermountain, and he felt that traffic wai noi going to
Donovan fe1t that the numben of condos should definite'ly:be limited to 4 unitsand the GRFA should be limited to 3500 sq ft. She also"stressed that whoever from
PEC was to be on the DRB shou'ld make sure that the design was improved.
Discussion then concerned which restrictions to use concerning who cou'ld purchasethe units and it was finally decided that the Uuvers wouid follow the same restrictionsas stated in the pitkin creek park declarations,
Trout expressed qualms about granting the variances since others in the neighborhoodourrng ile past year had wanted variances to have emp'l oyee housing, and were turned
down because of increase in den-sity. He pointed out thit the derrsity would bedoubled on this sjte. Jay repliei that in this caie Ctre units were'restrictedto employee housing.
Corioran pointed
and restrictions
owners wou'ld not
plus their costs.
oPEc
5/23/83 -3-
out that since the memo stated in #ll that the basic stipulations
concern,ing leasing would be the same as Pitkin Creek Park, the
be able to rent out their units for more than a certain amount
Corcoran repeated the concern for a pedestrian_way, and fel.t. that_something should
be worked oirt witn the Town. Jay said the applicants would be willing to work
with the Town.
Morgan stated that he would rather have seen this proposal as an SDD. Peterson
ansilered that there could be restrictiqns in the declarations, and that the declarations
wou'ld have to be approved by the Town. Patten stated that he had an SDD tlpe
of statement which'ilould be- #12 in the list of conditions: "The site plan, floor
plans, and all approved plans as submitted are hereby development p'l ans, and any
major changes to these must be approved by the PEC."
Jim Vie]e moved to a rove the uest for rezoni the staff memo dated
cations:
b,
a. That the applicant be al'lowed to construct not more than 3250 square feet
of GRFA and that the sale price average $85/square foot.
That #5 be stricken,
That #]2 be added as stated by Patten above.
That the word "parking" be inserted before the rcrd "maintenance" in item
#9.
The motion was seconded b r. The vote was 4 in favor 2a ai nst
ano lrouf,.
condition that a walkway be s and constru ssible.vote was
rcoran absta
c.
d.
Donovan moved and Vje'l e seconded to approve the request for parking vqllqnqe!i
4. Bq he '1Bg-l!ggf.-!g-!jl-at 3160 Katsos Ranch
Roafof Vail Mountain School
Peter Patten explained that the Town had recently passed an ordinance providing
for hjstorica1 bujlding status and that those buildings so designated were exempt
from following the Uniiorm Building Code for work done to preserve the buildings.
He gave the history on the Baldauf-cabin and felt tftat it did meet the criteria
necessary for the designat'ion.
Piper was concerned about the safety. 0gilby answered that the local building._
delartment would have jurisdict'ion over ihe construction. Steve Patterson, building
official, stated that the Mountain School was virtually rebuilding the building
n favor. I aqainst
Po EC 5/23/83 -4-
and bringing the footings, floor, electricity, alarm system, etc. up to code.
lfe added that the only thing not being changed gras the front door which openedin rather than out.
Corcoran asked if the Mountain School had been given the'ir first conditional
use approval based on a certain amount of square footage, and Patten explained
that it was based on the number of students, but that the Mountain School had
come back and asked for an open ended ni.lmber of students and received permissionfor an un] imited number of students.
!g!g!qn moved and Trout sec
5.Request for a side setback varjance in a Residentja'l zone district in order
to construct an addition to a res'idence on Lot '1. Block I. Vai] Villaqe 8th
aqle's Nes uscnman
Jim Sayre showed site plans and explained that the staff was recormendjng denial
because there were other alternatives avai'lable to the applicant. A1 Abplanalp,
representing the appl icant, repeated the reasons stated in the memo for reguesting
the variance. He added that the two lots, lot l and lot 2, were developed in
conjunct'ion With one another and the easement was to ensure each a view of the
Gore Range, He gave other examples of variances granted.
John Railton, of Trout Creek Co'llaborativeo architects for the project, statedthat his office had gone through the options ljsted in the memo. He discussed
each alternative.
Vie1e stated that the purpose of the side setback ordinance was to insure a mini-
mum setback, and that he was in favor of this request because of the extraordinary
circunstances. Piper agreed with the staff's philosophy and felt that the alterna-tives should be explored. He added, however, that with the nonbuildable area
there seemed to be adequate separation and low impact, and he was in favor of
the variance.
Donovan felt that as long as there were al ternatjve places where the addition
could be constructed, and the fact that the easement was not necessarily permanent,
she was against the variance. Morgan wondered if the setback could be ieducedif the addition were p'l aced where requested, and Sayre answered that -it would
.have to be a long narrow room. Morgan said he cou'ld not see any benef.it to
placing the addition anywhere e1se. Corcoran pointed out that the board had
turned down a side setback request in Bighorn which would have allowed a l0 foot
ajrlock, and the board accepted it after-the size was reduced to an 8 foot airlock,
showing that the board was concerned with degree of variance.
Donovan pointed out that there was the possibi'l ity that the lot with the easement
wou'l d be sold and the use of the area where there-was an easement changed as
had occurred elsewhere in the same neighborhood.. Abplanalp answered that in
the deed no bui'l d'ing "whatsoever" could be built in the easement. Larry Eskwith,
Town attorney, stated that the easement could be abandoned because the easentent
holder or his successor has control because 'it goes with the land.
PEC
l4organ asked which other variances had been grantel in !!q immed'iate area, and
Savie answered that there had been two others which he did not research' but
tnit tne staff had tried to be consistent with the Bighorn airlock refeffed to
by Corcoran.
Morqan mentioned Seibert'shouse remode'l , and Patten repeated that part of the
garige could be made into a bedroom, and a new garage built in front of it.
Viele moved and Morqan seconded to approve the setback variance request statingtf of special Privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties c'l assified in the same
district, that the grant'ing ofthe variance would not be detrimental to the public
hea'l th, safety, or welfare, or material1y injurjous to properties or improvements
in the vicinity, and that the variance was warranted because there were exceptions
or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the site that did not apply generally
to other properlies in the same zbne. The vote was 3 in favor, 2 aga'inst (Donovan
and Corcoran) and Trout abstained. The variance was qranted
6.uest for renewa'l of an existin r conditiona'l use rmit for the
onotam or arca
5123/83a -5-
Jim Sayre explained the memo and read the conditjons under which the renewal
could be grairted. Shockley, one of the owners stated that he felt the Town
supported the arcade, that he probably had 75% local customers, and wished to
rifriin in Vail. He was quest'ibned co-ncerning the percentage of customers who
were adults, to which he replied, "75%."
Piper moved and Corcoran seconded to 4pprove the renewal subiect !q-!!e -tg!Iiii
7.est for a side setback variance to construct a raqe for a residence
on lot oc ntermounta in .so a reques or variances from tions
be-T6caGd-paiTlal wThfi Town of Vail
to construct one -street oarkin
space tnan requlreo.arles barnes a
Jim Sayre explained the memo and showed site plans and elevations, Corcoran
read f lettei^ from Mike McGee of the Vajl Fire Department in which he stated
that the Fire Department was',notin favor of this variance.
Dave Irwjn, desiQner for the app'l icants, showed a rendered perspective.which
revea'led the steepness of the lbL. He explained how he arrived at the 9":igl
which wou'l d have the least impact, in his mind, on the property. He added that
since the Barnes' only owned one iar, four parking spaces would be more than
adequate, Sayre expiained that any-approval would be contingent upon the.Town
of Vai'l abandoiing the easement, ani thit Irwin d'id have the approval of the
utility companies.
-of-way and Section .|8.52.
PEc 5/23/83 O -6-
Trout was concerned with the method of constructjon, and Irwin explained the
reasons he wanted to build as presented.
Donovan fe1t the building did not belong on a steep lot, and Irwin said that
he had kept the addition as small as poss'ible, that he was using'less GRFA than
was a11owable. Donovan felt that it would be too imposing to the neighbors.
Irwin answered that that it lvas surrounded heavily wjth woods, and'that the addition
rras an lmprovement to the property.
Pf'per mentioned that they cou'ld not deny the number of units allowed in the zonedistrict, but that the number would be partial'ly determ'ined by the parking limitations.
He added that there may have to be a setback variance, but there should not be
a parking variance.
Viele agreed with Piper. Patten renjnded the members that non-conforming parking
could remain, but parking for the new addition must be satisfied. He said
that there were two questions, l. Are there three non-conform'ing parking spaces?
ard 2. what are the merits of the overall program3
Corcoran asked that assuming that there are three spaces, if the wall were rebuilt,
would the three spaces still be lega1 non-conforming? Sayre answered that the
non-conforming spaces could be repaired or improved, so long as the discrepancy'not increased. Vie'le stated that the burden of proof lay with the appljcant.
Dave Temell, representing the Andersons who own1ot 8, stated that there wou'ld
be visual b1 ockage, and from lot 8 it appeared to be a massive structure because
of the proximity of the project to lot 8. He was protesting especially the setback
variance which was close to the more level and most logical part of lot 8 upon
wltich to build. He added that any variance would set a precedent for further
variances on that street, and that it would prevent the minimum setbacks the
Torn was trying to maintain. He added that it was the board's responsibility
to protect absentee property owners, and that there would be a problem with snow
remova'l .
Irwin stated that he had considered all of these things, but that this was the
worst (most steep) lot he had ever seen. Discussion continued trying to. find
alternative methods of parking
Pioer moved and Donovan seconded to denv the reques.t for a side setback variance
privileqe inconsistent with the limitat'ions on other properties classified inprivilege_Lnconsistelt wi!h the limitatrons on other prope
oran qlsta'ini
8. A reqgest to amend Chapter 18.54, Design Review, of the Vail Municipal Code.
Appl'icant: Town of Vail
Jamar had asked him to request to tab'le th'isPeter Patten stated that
item. It was decided to
Peter
have a special meet'ing on June 20 at 2:00r seconded to table as requestecl '
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 pm.
pm for only
The vote wasthis item. Viele moved
5-0'in 'favorl--and Piri
Date o
ALTERATIOT.iS
coRE I (ccl)
trpiication May 23.1983
APPLICATION FORM FOR EXTERIOR
OR MODIFICATIONS fN COMMERCIAL
I.
ADDRESS 1000 So',tr r'.^ntag' Rdad west voi1, Co1^-€1657--PHONF 476-6776
NAME 0F 0!,'INER (Prjn r
L
SI ffi6QT t+"-- /,4rrf-L - t/6 t/
L/ Pll'P HoN E_!l9o__2? s - 2_1!2--
ADDRESS -gox Iq4n A.pca, c^l^rad^ 816Il
D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAT'
ADDRESSC
LEGAL DESCRIPTIOU nf""f. qa, t^t. n.
$100.00 plus an anount equal to-'th" tB" current fiTst'class postage
rate for each property owner to be notified herer:nder'
IMPRoVEMENTSURVEYoFPRoPERTYsHowINGP$PERTYT.,INESA}iDLocATIoN
OI' BUILDING AND NIIV iI'TPNOVEMENTS ON THE I&ND'
A LIST OF THE NAME OF OWNERS OF
SUBJECT PRoPERTY and their mailing
II. Four (4) coPies of a site plan containing tbe following information:
A. The sj-te plan shall be drawn on a sheet'size of 24' 136" at a scale
of 1" = 2-O'i a variatio'' oi"tt" =ftt"i sige-or scale may be approved
by the co**l!"itv- pevetopm"nt-o"pittment if jusLif ied;
c.
rj'
ls'F
!rFIi!
G.ALL PROPBRTY ADJACENT TO THE
addresses.
e
fA
This procedure is requi-red for alteration of an existing building
which adds or ."*oiui--uny enclosed floor area or ^outdoor patio or
replacement of ";";;i=iliq buildi"g-"hirr be subject to review bv
6;-;i;;In9 -a"a Environmental conmi-ssion'
TheaPPlicationwillnotbeaccepteduntilallinformationissubmitted.
A. NAI4E OF APPLICANT Dave Gorsuch
ADDRXSS263 Eas
PIIONE 476-22qlr
B.NA}IEoFAPPI.,ICAI{T'SREPRESENTATIVEGordonPierce',qrc_
o
Pierce
I
Gordon R.Architect A.I.A.
M.ay 23, L983
CLOCK TOWER 5UILDING REMODEL
SUIJUITTAI, DATA FOR AGENCY REVIEW
A. URBAN DESIGI{ CONSIDERATIONS
1. Peds trlaniza tion
The more unified building facades of this proposed remodel will ehhance
the pedestrian event on both Gore Creek Drive and on Brldge Street.
The Street level dlsplay areas and building entries r^ri11 encourage
pedestrians to explore more of the building/street interface--- especially
on Gore Creek Drive. This will tle in favorably with the Sub Area
Concept i.h:mber Six, as proposed in the Vail Village Urban Design GuidePlan... this concept proposes a stronger pedestrian link between the Mil1
Creek Courtyard and a proposed entry I'gateway" at the Mt11 Creek Bridge
on Gore Creek Drive.
2. Vehicle Penetration
Slnce the major use of this bul-lding will remain commercially ori.ented,
no major changes are. anticipated in vehicular actlvity in the area,
as a result of this remodeling, Due to the changlng of the lower leve1
area frorn a bar-type activity to a retail sales activity, some of the
delivery truck and refuse truck conjestion may actually be reduced.
The service alley on the eastern side remains virtually trndisturbed.
Parking and deliveries w111 continue to use the existing methods and
locations.
3. Streetscape Framework
Thls landmark buildtng, located at the major Vail Village intersectlon,is of paramount importance to the core area, By generating a bullding
facade that is of a unified, yet varlgated design the visual interest
and characEer of the building can only be hlghlighted. These changes
will be mosL apparent in the forms of of f -r"rhite stuceo and a unifying
element of stone at the base. The building r,ri11 then be provided with
a harrnoni.ous mixture of accent elernents such as display windows, bay
r^rindows, baleonies, wrought iron rai-1ings, planters, building-mounted
1lghting, canvas awi-ngs, benches, signage, and wooden entry doors of
interest j.ng design.
4. Street Enclosure
The "0utdoor Room" j-n the vicinlty of the project will be made more
interesting by increasing the opportunit.ies for store/bulldlng entries
and <iisplays, and of the variety of accent elements noted previously.
The mass of the building will have only minor alterations in relationship
to tire building-he ight-to-s treet-width racio.
1000 South Frontage Road West. Vail, Colorado 81657'303/476-6776
/l-
CLOCK TOWER BUILDING REMODEL
l4ay 23, 1983
page trro
Therefore, the perception of the exterior spaces vi11 remain in the
s:rne general "comfort' range as lt ls currently. Naturally, the awings
and window displays at street 1eve1 r^rill reinforce a pedestrl-an scale;the upper 1eve1 display area will announce to the public that they are
welcome to enter the buildlng and visit the upper leveL retail area lnaddition to the street level shopping.
5,.. - Stteer Edge
rt is the intention of the developer to define, and refine, the street
edge by introducing accent pavlng as a grade 1eve1 "apron" on the south
- and west Elevati-ons. This naterlal will mostly be brlck pavers ser ona concrete bed---slnrilar to the brlck paving used elsewhere in the Village.
Access by fire fighcing equipuent and by olher service vehicles isnaintained.
6. Bulldlng Heiehr
The building heighr is unchanged.
7. yiews
The proposed urodiflcations have no effectg on maJor or mlnor viewcorridors. The short streetscape vievs from the buildlng environs w111be inproved, as descrl"bed prevlously,
B. ZO}IING CODE ITEMS
I. Density Control
[ininum Allor"rable Lot Area.
Actual Lot Area . +Setbacks. ....;
A1lowable GRFA
I'rttual - and proposed GPJ'A
Actual and proposed Number of Dwelling Units
Al1owab1e Nunber of Dwelling Units
Actual and proposed Nr.mber of Dwelling Units
A1lowable site coverage . .
(Re: 18.04.360, 18.24.150)
Actual Sire Coverage (Existing) 7BAZ.47 S.F.
Actual Site Coverage (Proposed) 7909.56 S.F.
Excluded in this area is approxLmatly 125 square feet that is aporcion of the Slifer Buildlng whlch ls physically locared on aportion of thi.s property. It should also be noted that some of thebuilding lies beyond the property line to the East. This area contains
approximately I77 square feet and is not included in any calculations.
Staff has directed the applicant to exclude the patio area on the Westof the building (contai,ning approximately 750 square feet) fron the
sLte coverage calculations r
5000.00 s.F.
8670.00 s.r. (r.99 Ac1*
None
6936.00 s.F.
0.00 s.F.
Zeto
49
Zeto
6936.00 S.F. ]trt
CLOCK TOWEIT BUILDII.IG DEL
Flay 23, 1983
page three
o
RE}1O
2. Landscape Area Reduction
The existing planter on the West will remain unchanged. It is theapplicantts desire to place removable planters and/ or trees r,sith treegrates and protective guards on the southern elevation, This willbe a significant i-mprovement over the current non-existing landscapingin that area. tsrick grade-1evel walkways will provide yet anoEher warmand unifying design element to the remodeled building. Benches willbe located along Bridge Street for use by the public.
3. Parking
Existing parking facilities and locations will remaj-n unchansed.
I{oo f s
The majority of the building shall remain white stucco. Accent areas
of native stone will- reinforce the concept of one bullding/one major
retail facillty. The rock used will be compatible and similar to the
moss rock planters near Gastoff Gramshammer and the Casino Building.
Prorninent wood trim will be stained to match the existing colors.
Clear glass in the display windows will provide glimpses of the
interior of the building, as well as allowing the window dlsplays to
enhance the color .and spirt of the street. Exterior doors will be
specially designe<i and color-coordinated . The existlng wrought iron
rpi11 remaln. Facade transparency will increase on the street level
and the upper 1eve1 by the lntroduction of new glassed areas. The
large display case on l3ridge Street w111 be rnade a bit more human
in s.a1e by f i11ing in two th:irds of the wj-ndow with srone. This
will also give more importance to the remaining glass area.
3. Balconies
ARCIT]TECTUAL/LANDSCAPII{G CONSIDEMTIOI{SC.
The existing balconies will remaj.n
the balcony on the South Elevation
ret.ail shop. This balcony will be
area and to become the roof of the
4. Decks and Patios
virtually unchanged except for
near the existing doors to the
enclosed to generate a display
new airlock foyer.
llo funcEj.onal or practical changes are proposed for the existing
decks and patlos.
5. Accent Elements
Refer to earlier portions of thj-s document for discussion of accenE
areas of stone, brick, copper and wrought iron. Additionally, theexisting polished brass logo elements will be retained, as rvell as
the brightly colored awriings.
CLOCK TOI.JER BUILDING REMODEL' l{ay 23J983-
page four
6. Landscape Elements
Nat ive plant rnat,erials and flowering annuaLs r,ri1l be utilized ln the
:: - window flower boxes. Medium slze evergreen trees and shr.bbs-r^rill- beutillzed in the tree grates and renovable ptranters. Lighting for theexterlor of the building,wll-1 be discreet and indirect !,rith accentlighting rather than a general flood Lighting rnethod.
Servi.ce access ls unchanged. The quantity and frequency of delivery
truekE may be somewhat reduced due to lhe change of a restautarLtfbarfacility to a--ski rental facility. Trash storage and trash removal
renains the same.
CLOCK TOWER BUILDING RFfiODEI,
, l4ay 23, 1983
- page five
NAIfiS AhlD ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OIONERS FOR PROPERTY ADJOINING
BUIIJING).
Glock Tower Building
Mr. John McBride
Box 1940
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Slifer Building' Mr. Rod Slifer
230' Brldge Street
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gastoff Gramshanmer, Inc.
Be a thune-+Ros enq uis t-Swi tzer-Dobson
231 East Gore Creek
Vai1, Colorado 8L657
Store Bullding
A & B Enterprises, Inc.
c/o Vincent J. Domenico
12405 West 19th Place
Denver, Colorado 80215
Casino Building
Bridge Street Condominium Association
c/o Brandess-Cadmus Real Estate
281 Brldge Srreet
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Vail Townhouse-(Block S, Lot 1-.6)
Betsy G T.O.V. to provlde names
addresses as discussed r.rith her.
BLOCK 5A,
clocK TowER
The
5.
and
{'e , /rs
Gordon R. Picrce Architect A.I.A.
A.
May 23, 1983
CLOCK TOWER 5UILDING REMODEL
SUBMITTAL DATA FOR ACENCY REVIEW
URsAN DESIGi{ COI{SIDEMTIONS
1. Peds f.rlanization
The nore unlfled bulldlng facades of this proposed rernodel wlll eirhancethe pedesEri-an event on both Gore creek Drlve and on Brldge street.
The street leve1 dlsplay areas and buildlng entrLes will encourage
pedesErians to explore more of Lhe bulldlng/street interface--- especially
on Gore Creek Drive. This w111 tle 1n favorably wlth the Sub Area
concept Number six, as proposed ln the Val1 village urban D€slgn GuldePlan-.. thls concept proposes a stronger pedestrlan 11nk between the MillCreek Courtyard and a proposed entry ,gateway', at the Ml11 Creek Brldge
on Gore Creek Drlve.
2. Vehlcle Penetratlon
since the maJor use of this building will remain commerclally ori€nted,
no major changes are anElclpated ln vehlcular activlty ln the area,as a result of this remodellng. Due to the changlng of che lower levelarea f rorn a bar-type activlty to a retail sales actlvity, some of thedellvery truck and refuse truck conleetion may acLually be reduced.
The service a1ley on the eastern side remains vi.rtually trndisturbed.Parklng and deliveries will continue to u6e the exlstlng methods and
locaEions.
3. Streetscape Framework
This landmark buildlng, located at the major Vail Village lntersection,is of paramount lmportance to the core area. By generatlng a bullding
facade that is of a unifled, yeE varlgated deslgn the visual interest
and character of the buildlng can only be highlighted. These changee
r^r111 be most apparent in the forns of of f -rohite atucco and a unlfying
element of srone at the base. The bulldlng will then be provlded rltha harrnonlous mlxture of accent.elemente such as dlsplay wlndows, bay
vlndows, ba1conles, wrought lron ralllnge, pl"antere, buildlng-mountedllghtlng, canvaa awings, benches, slgnage, and wooden entry doors oflnteresting deeign.
4. Street Enclosure
The "0utdoor Roomt' ln the vicinlty of the project w111 be made norelnterestlng by increasing the opportunitles for store/bullding entries, and diaplays, and of the varlety of accent eleruents noted prevlously.
The mass of the bullding wLll have on1-y mlnor alteratlons ln relatl-onahlp ,to the bulldlng-helght-to-street-wldth ratio. l,i:,,;
. i'
..1,i
t000 South Frontage Road West. Vail, Colorado 81657.303/476-6716.,:,,ii;,,::,
CLOCK TOWUR tsUILDINi RIIMODEL
Hay 23, 1983
page two
Therefore, the perception of the exterlor apaces will remaLn in the
same general "comfort" range aa it is currently. Naturally, the arrlngsand wlndow dlsplays at gtreet level wiLr reLnforce a pedestrlan scale;the upper revel display area wiLl- announce to the publlc that they arewelcome to enter the bulldlng and vlsit the upper leveL retail area lnaddltion to the street level ehopplng.
5. St.reet Edge
rt Is the intention of the developer to deflne, and ref 1-ne, the screetedge by inEroducing accent paving as a grade level "apron, on the southand llest Elevations. This uaterlal will nostly be brick pavers ser ona concrete bed---slml1ar to the brlck pavlng used elsewhere ln the Vtllage.Acceas by flre flghtlng equlpnent and by other servlce vehLcles isnaintalned.
6. Buil-ding Helghr
The bullding height is unchanged.
7. Views
The proposed modiflcations have no effects on maJor or minor vlewcorrldors. The short streetgcape flewe from the bulldlng environs wllrbe lmprove.d, as descrLbed prevlousJ.y.
B. ZONING CODE ITEI{S
t. Densl-tv Control
llinimurn Al1owab1e Lot Area. 5OOO,OO S.F.Actual Lot Area . + 8670.00 S.F. (1.99 Ac;*setbacks I Norr.Allowable GRFA 6936.00 S.F.Abtual and proposed CR"FA O.O0 S.F.Actual and propoeed Number of Dwelling Unlts . . . ZeroAllowable Number of Dwelllng Unlrs . 49Actual and proposed Number of Dwelling Unlts . . . Zero
AlLowable 61te coverage . . 6936.00 S.F. ?tlt
(Re: 18.04.360, 18. 24.L5O)
Actual Slre Coverage (ExlstlnS) 7902.47 s.F.Actual SLte Coverage (proposed) 7909.56 S.F.
Excluded ln thds area is approxlmatly 125 square feet that is aportlon of the S1{fer Bullding whlch is physlcally located on aportlon of thle property. It should also be nored that some of thebulldlng lles beyond the property llne to the East. Thls area contains
approximateLy L77 square feet and ia not included ln any calculatlons.
Staff has directed the appllcait to exclude the patlo area on the Westof the bulldlng (containlng approxlnately 750 equare feet) fron theelte coverage calculatlons.
i,
l.r, r/i ,:-,F !ria,, .
'; :irdllitti ii {
t
Rn"10CLOCK TOWE]T EUI],DINC DEI,
l*Iay 23, 1983
page three
2. Landscape Area Reduction
,n. ffisr \rilr renain unchanged. rt rs rheappllcan!r s deslre to place removabl-e pl.anters and/or trees r.rlth treegrates and protective guards on the southern elevation. Thls willbe a signi.ficant lmprovement over the current non-existing landscaplngln that area. Brlck grade-1eve1 walkways r"r111 provlde yet anoEher warmand unifying deslgn element to the remodeled buirdlng. Benches rvlllbe located along Bridge Street for use by the publle.
3. Parking
Exlstlng parklng faclllries and locabions wlll- remaln unchangeti.
1. l{oof s
The majorlty of the building shall remaln white stucco. Accenr areasof natl-ve stone will reinforce the concept of one bullding/one majorretall facillty. The rock used wlll be compatlble and slmilar to the
rnoss rock planters near Gastoff Gramshammer and the casino Building.Prominent vood trim wl11 be sEained Eo match che existing colors,Clear glass ln che display wlndows will provide glimpses of theinterior of the building, as well as al]_owing the windor.r displays to
enhance the color and spl-rt of the street. ExterLor doors will bespecially deslgned and color-eoordlnated. The exlstlng wrought ironwl1l remaln. Facade Eransparency wt1l increase on the street level
and che upper level by the lntroductlon of new glassed areas. Thelarge dlsplay case on )Jrldge Streec. wlLl be made a blt more humanin scale by f i1ling in t\,/o thtrds of che window r,ri th stone. Thls
w111 also glve more importance to the remal-ning glass area.
3. Balconies
The existilng balconies will remain virtually unchanged except forthe balcony on the South Elevation near the exlsting doors to theretail shop. This balcony will be enclosed Eo generate a displayarea and to become the roof of the new airlock fover,
4. Decks and Patlos
No functlonal or practlcal changes are proposed for the exisLlng
decks arrd patlos.
5. Accent Elements
Refer to earller portlons of thls document for dlscussion of accent
areas of stone, brlck, copper and wrought iron. AddittonaLllr theexls tl-ng poJ-lshed brass logo el,eroenEs wll-l be retalned, as well as
the brightly colored awriings .' r;1
.;
i ,::i, ,
rl, ]]
' .i ;.
CLOCK TOWER BUILDING
6. Landscape ELements
liat lve plant materiale and f lor.rering annusl-e will- be utillzed ln the
I
Rh]MOD
rlndow floser boxes. l{ediun alze evertreen trees.and shrubs wllL bebtllized th the tree grates and rercvable planters. Llghting for therxterlor of the buildlug will be diccreet and Lndirect wlth accentItghtlng rather theo a general flood ltghtlng merhod.
quantity and frequency of dellvery
to the chaoge of a restaurant,/bar
Tresh etorage and trash renoval
CLOCK TOWER BUILDING RUMODEL
l,Iay 23, 1983
page flve
NAI'{ES A\ID ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNERS FoR PR0PERTY ADJOINING BLocK 5A,
LOTS D, E, PART OF C IN THE VAIL VILLAGE FIRST FILING (THE CLOCK TOWER
BUIT,DING).
. 1. The Clock Tower Buildlng
Mr. John McBrlder gox 1940: Aepen, Colorado 8f5fl
2, The Slifer Bulldlng
Mr. Rod Sllfer
230 Bridge Street
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Gaetoff Gramshanner, Irrc.
Beathune+Ros enquls t-swLtzer-Dobeon
231 East C,ore Creek
Vai1, Colorado 8f657
Llquor Store Buildlng
A & B Enterprlses, Inc.
c/o VLncent J. Domenlco
12405 West l9th Place
Denver, Colorado 80215
Caelno Bulldtng
Brldge Street Condomlnlun Aseociatlon
c/o.Brandess-Cadmus Real gstat,e
281 Brtdge Street
Vall, Colorado 8f657
Val1 Townhouse-(Block S, Lot 1-6)
Betsy G T.O.V. to provlde names and
addresses as dlscussed nlth her.
3.
4.
5.
6.
+
$r-oc<. t'owiirr.iitl I 1,DLI'l(l llllli(ri)i,-1,
I'i.ry 23, I9ti3
page three
c.
2. I.andscape Arcra _.i!c-4-ttc_!&g
The exisLi;tg planter cn the lllcs t will- remai.n unehanl5ed . J. I is the
applicant t s desire to place removable planters andfor tr(:cs l,rith tree
grates and protecrivc guards on the Soutirern elevation. 'l'iris wj-1l
be a significanE improvement over the current non-existitr* l-andscaPing
in lhat area. Brick grade-level wa li',rvay s will provide yct another warm
and unj.fying design elenient to the remodeled building' Bi:nches will
be located along .Bridge St.reet for use by the public.
3. Parking
llxisting parking facilit.ies and locaLions will remain unchanged.
ARCigT ECTUAL / LAI'IDS CAP Il.lC CON S I D ERAT I Oi!9
1. Itoofs
The rnajority of the building shall remain white stucco. Accent areas
of native sLone will reinforce the concept of one buildinS/one major
retail facility. Tbe rock used will be compatible and sirniLar to the
moss rock planters near Gastoff Gramshammer and the Casino Building.
Prominent rvood trim will be stained to match the exlsting colors.
Clear glass in the display windows will provlde glimpses of the
interior of the building, as \^re 11 as allowing the window displays to
enhance the color and spirt of the street. Exterior doors will be
specially designed and color-coordina Eed. The existing wrought iron
r^ril1 remain. Facade transparency will increase on the street level
and the upper 1eve1 by the introduction of new glassed al:eas. The
large display case on liridge StreeE will be made a bit rnore human
in scale by f illing in tr,ro thirds of lhe windora wj.th scone. This
will also give more importance to the remaining glass area.
3, Balconie€
The exist.ing balconies will remaj,n
tlie balcony on the South Elevation
retail silop. This balcony will be
area and to become Lhe roof of the
4. Decks and Patlos
No functional or pra-cEical changes
decks and paLios.
5. Accent Elements
virtually unchanged excePE for
near the exisEing doors to the
encl-osed to ger-rerate a displaY
new airlock foyer.
are proposed for the existing
Rcfer to earlier porLions of
ar:eas of stone, brick, copper
existlug polished brass Iogo
the brighcly colorcd avrnitrgs.
Ehis docurnent
and wrought
elenrents will
for discussion of accent
iron, Additionally' the
be retained, as rvell as
: l^*'' . IJ.-:LOCK 10W$R iJUll,l)Il'lc Ril}lol)1.1.z :;.;;-TT--TqH r'i4ay 23, 1983
. 'page f our
..r. g. L-andscape Ulemeqrs
Natj-ve plant nuterial.s and flowering annuals wi.lI be util i::r:d in the
winciow f lower boxes. I'ledium size evetgreen trees and sltr:trirs wil"l be
urilized in che t.ree grates and removable planters. Lightjng for the
exterior of the builtiing wil-l be discreet and indirect with accent
lighting rather than a general flood lighring method-
. 7. Service
Service access is unchanged. The quantity and frequency of delivery
trucks may be somewhat reduced due to the change of a restaurant/bar
facility to a ski rental faclllty, Traah storage and trash removal
remains the same.
Tlre fol lo*ing inforr:tion is rcquil'qd for subnittal by thc appl icrrnt to the DesignBoard bcfore a fin:l approval ctin lrc givcn:Rcv i cw
A. IiUl LIUN(,- tii'fERi,r.Ls
t{oot
Sid ing
Other l'ial I lttat e:i aI s
Fascia
Soffi t s
lf indo'','s
lltnoow I l'1m
Doors
Door Trim
llard ot Deck Ra i i s
Fl ues
FIa-shi.ngs
Chir::neys
Trash Enc-l osures
Gl.c,r-lrhotts es
Other
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer:
Phone :
PLANT I'IATER IALS
T),pe of ltrtcrial Col or
TREES
leleligsL,,,qqe Coningn |,i6rxg
e-"-iss&&1
9rqnt_i!t
.a__
Size
t.71SHRUESAn&-1",0Q.
saret
SEED
SQUARE F00TAGE:_--
SQUARE FooTAGE
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD
OF EROSION CONTROL
Other Landscape Features
t
(reta I nl ng viial I s ,ferrces, swinmlng pools, etc.) Please spectfy.c.
t.^
75 soulh tronlage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000 oltlce ol communliy development
August 18, .|983
Gordon Pierce.1000 S. Frontage Rd. |,|.
Vail, C0 8.l658
Re: Gorsuch Ltd. Exterior Remodel
Lots C,D,E, Block 5, Vail V'i 11age lst.
Dear Gordon:
0n August 17, 1983, the Design Revl'ew Board approved the Gorsuch exterior
remodel as submiteed. The trees are to be 5 2'-3'mountajn ash; tree
guards are to be provided and paver material studied by staff.
Si ncerely,
../4;-. (Vq.---
//u - v- ./Jidl Sayre
Town Planner
JS/bb
Project Applicatlon
Proiect Name:
Proiect Descriptio
Contact Person
Owner, Address
-{zt', /"'lt:-U ci* 'l.t: €, r4rw (ype f {zr -t: vtuf
Zone
-
Design Review Board
on" 4rJL r?
.:;u&HtlT;A DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
E staft Approval
aI !lo!r!_!!wrir! _qq r.rrrlli{li tj!ilql2l;llitay 23, l9dJ
p a i)e tltree
2. !ena,.sS_qpe_4r g1=(qd_uclige
The existing planler cln Ehe l'Jest will rcrrain uncl,ange.l . l.t ls the
applicant.rs desire to place rernovabfe pl.rurters and/ot trcqs vtith tree
grates and protective guards on the Soutltern elevatlon. llhis will
be a significant inprovement over the current non-existing landscaping
in Ehat area, l3rick grade-level wal-kl,tays will provide yet anocher warm
and unifying design elenent to the r:emodeled building' Bcnches rvill
be located along J3ridge Street for use by che publie.
^'-J , rar Kr_ng
Existing parking facilities and locations.will remain unchanged.
c. ARCHTTECTUAL/LANpSCAPil,{c coNS!pEF.ATTONS
l. Itoo f s
The majorlty of the building shall remain whlce stucco. Accent areas
of aative stone will reinforce the concepE of one buildtng/one major
retail facility. The rock used raill be conPatible and similar to the
uross lock planters near Gastoff Gramshammer and Ehe Casino Building,
Pr:omi[ent. wood trim will be stained to maEch the existing colors.
Clear glass in the display windows rvill provide glimpses of the
lnterior of the building, ae well as allowing the windorv displays to
enhance the color and spirt of the srreet. Exterior door:s will be
specially designeci and color-coord ina ted. The exl.sting wrought lron
will remain. Facade transparency will l-ncrease on the sEreet level
and the upper level by the introduction of new glassed areas. The
large display case on l3ridge Street r^rill be made a bit more human
inscale by filling in t\,,/o thirds of the window with stone. This
vi1l also glve more importance to the remaining glass area.
3. Balconies
The exlst.ing baleonies will remain
Lhe balcony on the South Elevati,on
retail shop. This balcony rvi1l be
area and lo become the roof of the
4. Decks and Patios
virtual 1y unchanged except for
near the exisEing doors to the
enclosed to gencrate a disPlaY
new airlock fover,
for discussion of accent
iron. Additionarlly' the
be retained, as well as
No functional or pra-c t ical
decks aud patios.
5. Accent Iilements
Refer: to earl,ier porlions of this document
areas of sLone, brick, copper and wrought
exisuing polished brass logo elements will
LIre brightly colorcd awnings.
ciranges are proposed for Ehe existing
I' cr,!igli:!gwr1!lju.I!.r,!l{._l!l..iiqyt!
'tl:ay 23, Lt)83
p;rge f our
6 . Lands cap e lil emejr-t-e
Native pLant, materlals and f lowering ;rr:mrals vrlll be util I zt:rl ln the
wln<iow flower boxes. I'te<tium size evqrgrcen trees and shrubs w111 be
utilized j,n the tree grates and removable planters. Lightin| for the
exterior of the building will be discreet and indirect with accent
Lighting rather than a general flood lighting rnethod.
7. Service
Service access is unchanged. The quantity and frequency of delivery
trucks may be somewhat reduced due to the change of a resEaurant/bar
facility to a. ski rental facility. Trash storage and trash removal-
remains the same.
aI !lo!r!_!!wrir! _qq r.rrrlli{li tj!ilql2l;llitay 23, l9dJ
p a i)e tltree
2. !ena,.sS_qpe_4r g1=(qd_uclige
The existing planler cln Ehe l'Jest will rcrrain uncl,ange.l . l.t ls the
applicant.rs desire to place rernovabfe pl.rurters and/ot trcqs vtith tree
grates and protective guards on the Soutltern elevatlon. llhis will
be a significant inprovement over the current non-existing landscaping
in Ehat area, l3rick grade-level wal-kl,tays will provide yet anocher warm
and unifying design elenent to the r:emodeled building' Bcnches rvill
be located along J3ridge Street for use by che publie.
^'-J , rar Kr_ng
Existing parking facilities and locations.will remain unchanged.
c. ARCHTTECTUAL/LANpSCAPil,{c coNS!pEF.ATTONS
l. Itoo f s
The majorlty of the building shall remain whlce stucco. Accent areas
of aative stone will reinforce the concepE of one buildtng/one major
retail facility. The rock used raill be conPatible and similar to the
uross lock planters near Gastoff Gramshammer and Ehe Casino Building,
Pr:omi[ent. wood trim will be stained to maEch the existing colors.
Clear glass in the display windows rvill provide glimpses of the
lnterior of the building, ae well as allowing the windorv displays to
enhance the color and spirt of the srreet. Exterior door:s will be
specially designeci and color-coord ina ted. The exl.sting wrought lron
will remain. Facade transparency will l-ncrease on the sEreet level
and the upper level by the introduction of new glassed areas. The
large display case on l3ridge Street r^rill be made a bit more human
inscale by filling in t\,,/o thirds of the window with stone. This
vi1l also glve more importance to the remaining glass area.
3. Balconies
The exlst.ing baleonies will remain
Lhe balcony on the South Elevati,on
retail shop. This balcony rvi1l be
area and lo become the roof of the
4. Decks and Patios
virtual 1y unchanged except for
near the exisEing doors to the
enclosed to gencrate a disPlaY
new airlock fover,
for discussion of accent
iron. Additionarlly' the
be retained, as well as
No functional or pra-c t ical
decks aud patios.
5. Accent Iilements
Refer: to earl,ier porlions of this document
areas of sLone, brick, copper and wrought
exisuing polished brass logo elements will
LIre brightly colorcd awnings.
ciranges are proposed for Ehe existing
I' cr,!igli:!gwr1!lju.I!.r,!l{._l!l..iiqyt!
'tl:ay 23, Lt)83
p;rge f our
6 . Lands cap e lil emejr-t-e
Native pLant, materlals and f lowering ;rr:mrals vrlll be util I zt:rl ln the
wln<iow flower boxes. I'te<tium size evqrgrcen trees and shrubs w111 be
utilized j,n the tree grates and removable planters. Lightin| for the
exterior of the building will be discreet and indirect with accent
Lighting rather than a general flood lighting rnethod.
7. Service
Service access is unchanged. The quantity and frequency of delivery
trucks may be somewhat reduced due to the change of a resEaurant/bar
facility to a. ski rental facility. Trash storage and trash removal-
remains the same.