The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLions Ridge Filing 2 Lot G3 Eiger Chalets Unit 14 legalPage 1 of I Bill Gibson - Eiger Chalet Facelift From: To: Date: Subject: CC: <MBMorrisl@aol.com> <ajmvail@comcasl. net> 07110120067:17 AM Eiger Chalet Facelift <markconvail@uno.com>, <tgkrebs@bellsouth.net>, <burrowsl 001 1 @yahoo.com>, <acyvail@comcast. net>, <helmut@helmutf ricker.com>, <vailcondo@wi. rr.com>, <diewelt@msn.com>, <rlilien@rbh.com>, <bgibson@vai lgov.com> Mr. Jeff Mowry--July B, 2006-Unit 14-Eiger Chalet Dear Jeff, Thank you so very much for your extended ejforts in the Eiger Chalets facelift project. After seeing and reviewing the final plans, I am excited about getting started. -l greatly appreciate your offer and willingness to seek Design Review Board approval to retain the present garage area living space in units 4 & 6. I believe that you are proposing that this potential design problem be solved by replacing a standard garage door in its normal position and adding a long window to the uppermost garage door frame. This, seemingly, would satisfy our need to preserve this very fuunclional living area, and solve a very big problem. -l have no knowledge about specific window type availability so can't comment on this aspect. I am naturally concerned about light and ventilation needs. Currently, in Unit 4, this is not a problem. My present windows are functional, and.not unattractive, in my opinion. Has our architect studied and given his opinion on all options to help the potential design problem? Mr. Gibson's advice to me to see our architect, would be moot, if he has already studied this problem. --On another issue, most Phase I owners are highly in lavor of fireplace natural gas availability, lF the pipes can be installed WITHIN the walls. As you know, Units 5 & 6 have it outside the walls. On the one occasion where I met our general contractor, he mentioned that it would be no problem for his plumber to provide an estimate. Phase I owners, who utilize this option, don't expect Phase ll owners to pay lor this additional amenity. Would you prefer that I renew this contact or can you do this? Please provide me with our contractors number if you want me to do this. Thanks. -Most Phase I owners are really anxious to get this project underuay and very appreciative of your outstanding efforts -Thanks again lor all your help. Mylon Unit 4 Gopies: Units 1,2,3,5,6, Helmut, Bruce, Bill Gibson-TOV Planner file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\GW) 00001 .HTM 0'71I012006 Mylon B. Morris 4485 Governor's Point C'olorado Springs' CO 80906 719-667-0339 ,tu1y 8, 2QO6 Mr. Jef f l{owry 8OO E. West clov Lane creenwood Village, CO 80121 RE: Facellft Dear ilef f , Thank you so very much for your extended efforts ln the Eiger Chalets faeelift project. After seeing and revieving the final- plans, f am excited about getting started. I greatly appreciate your offer and willingness to seek Design Revier'r Board approval to retain the present garage area living space in units 4 & 6.I believe that you are proposlng that this potential design problen be solved by replacing a standard garage door in its normal position and adding a long wlndow to the uppermost garage door frame. Thl,s, seemingly, rqould satisfy our need to preserve this very functtonal living area, and solve a very big problem' I have no knowledge about speeific window type availability so qanrt comment on this aspeet. f am naturally concerned about adequate light and ventilation needs- Currently, in unit 4, this is not a problem. My present vindolrs are functlonal, and not unattractive, in my opinion. Has our architect studled and given his opinion on all options to help the potential design problem? Mr. Gibson's advice to ne to iee ou} architect, vould be moo!, if he has already studied this problen. On another issue, mosu Phase f o{ners are hlghly in favor of fireplace natural gas availabillty, if the pipes can be instltled within the waLls. As you knotr, units 5 & 6 have it outside the walls. On the one occasion where f met our general contractor, he mentioned that lt would be no problem ior his plumber to provide an estimaLe. Phase r ovners, vho utilize this option, donrt expect Phase TJ oI'rners to pay for this additional amenity. Would you prefer that I renew this contact or can you do this? Please provide me our contractors number if you vant me to do this' Thanks' Most Phase f owners are rea11y anxlous to get this project underway and very appreciative of your outstanding efforts. Thanks again for all Your helP. :(' ^-'.\ Mylon'1 Unit 4=J Coptes: Units \,2,3,5/6, Helmut, Bruee, Bill Glbson-Planner atu cial& Mylon B. Morris 4485 Governor's Point Colorado Springs, C0 80906 719-667 -0339 July 8, 2OO5 Mr. ,Jeff Mowry unlt 14 Dear Jeff Thank you for my copy of your letter and proposed plans on the Eiger Chal-et remodel-ing project. First and foremost, I want to t,hank you so very much for your efforts. This seems Llke a very difficult project to qet organized. We seem to have problems and needs that eonceivabl-y exceed probably any other condo or townhouse project in vail. What happened in Vail building projects in 1977 probably couldn't happen in vail 2005. f very much like the overall desi.gn presented and reviewed at your home last vinter (fa11?), and would l-ike to proceedrrith whatever the final plans entail. There are however, some "cost" eonstraints by some ovners, I am certain. I wi11 agree to "anything" that is agreeable to the rnajority, so that we can upgrade our units as soon as possible. Having said the above, T feel compelled to advise that there are some differences in the truo buildings and their design, vhich, I thinl<, vould require an architect to resolve. For example:1) Size of unit d i fferences-- and ultimate cost differences 2) Stone work present in Building 1 (6 units) above the foundation lral-ls which is nob present in Building 2 (B units). Building 1 may lrant to retain the present stonewor]< and not convert to the new stone suggested for Building 2. A1so, the current Building 1 stone matches vell with the stone va11 by unit 1, and the new lightpost by upper wa11. 3) Different vindow configurations in the tvo buildings. fn addition to the above -Bul1dinq 1: 4) Units 2, 5,6 need consider new stone covers for theparty va11 base. (note: Unit t has a special finish r'rhich goes pretty ve1l vith the stone & stucco interface, l think) 5) Units 2,4,5,6 have "closed" the entry coves. Do units 1, 3 ffant to enclose to get more foyer space, or, leave as is? 6) Units 4, 6 do not have garages or garage doors, and have windows in the lJaragie door space. 7) Unit 6 has a windov next to the external door space- Units 4, 5 do notr €verr though they have enclosed foyers and added doors. Page Z---Jeff MorcrY 8) Units 2, 5,6 have wood walls around the oufside door' Unit, 4 traa stucco. Do we have suggestlons for any unit to- conform or leave as is? (note: stucco perhaps doesn't cost much when done at same time as remainlng stucco job' ) 9) Units 1, 2,3, 4,5, have "long" window'-Unit 6 has two "short'r windows. Unit 4 r.rants to go to two short vindows as he has ultimate plans to enLarge the master bedroom' 10) Units 1, 5 have similar styled front doors. Units 2' 3, 4, 6 have i@ all different styled front doors' Are changes necessary? 11 ) ProbablY other differences????? 12)Buildinglalsohasthepotentialtogotonaturalgas.Tf we do thii, T think that the pipe should be enclosed rather ttran exposed as at present' While the above presents some unique design problems' T believe that an archltect can oveicome ttrese and combine the positiveandnewdesignfeaturesfrombuilding2intothenew building 1 scheme. f believe that we can greatly irnprove our building ipp."iu".e, minimize our need for painting' and r look forward to wort<ing vith alL neighbors to a successful conclus i on. ileff, Thant<s again for all of your efforts' Please call if I can he1p. l"lost sincerelY, ( t4yl-on-.t \_-----/Copy: Units I,2,3,5,6, Helmut, Bruce crlf,*Jn|TY tEtiELtFtEt{t fuC*'-|t' Design Review Board ' +'+ ACTIOI{ FORM Department of Cornmunity treverlopment 75 sor.$th Frontage Raad, Vail, Eolorado 81"657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.?452 web: urwrrr, vai lgov"corn Projectt{ame: ltA*rf fus. gepS Proiect Description: Pafticipants: OWNER MOWRY, AUBERT J. & BARBAM ]LOI3LIaOO5 8OO E WESTGLOW LN GREENWOOD VILI.AGE co 80121 APPUCANT MOWRY, AUBERT J. & BARBARA J 1O/31i2005 8OO E WESTGLOW LN GREENWOOD VILLAGE co 80121 ProjectAddress: 1350 SANDSTONE DR VAIL EIGER CHALETS #14 Legal Description: Lot: G-3 Block Subdivision: EIGER CHALETS Parcel l{umber: 2103-121-0301-4 Comments: SeeConditions DRB Number: DRB0505B9 FINAL APPROVAL FOR ADDING TWO STEPS AND A PLANTER BOX. AS THERE IS NO HOME owNERS ASSOCIATTON STAFF REQUTRED THE HOMEOWNER TO HAVE ALL OWNERS OF UNITS IN THE BUILDING SIGN AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE WORK. Location! Motion By: Second By: Vote: Gonditions: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Action: STAFFAPR Date of Approva| 0112312006 Cond: 8 (P|-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond: 202 Approval of this p@ect shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. ,r--ffi Minor Exterior Alterations Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2128 ta<; 97A.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Informationr All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submiHing a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request: f"aAE. 7?,A€74ce .'qtr ?Z/z D/a,..t 4nZ/4 47'.PL/Y4: /4/,r'D'^2 tt )uao2d ,ftdE€ aN, daz//J 4av*:ze' - R' Location of the Proposaa: tot: 43 ebck:- Sy66iyisisni A te'Vf4/D6€ f-t t t,uodE P,4€74ce 4E ZZrz D//a.-t .4fi2/4 I 7' -?taVc- lqlr'Dr4e7/4 Location of the Proposaf: Lot: EJ Block:_ $yfifiyis,isl; A lr'Fr/c/o2a'e r-lLlao' . J11 physicaf Address: ,/3V/ t7;Np"f)zVn/g .ea,z- gzz' gI Parcel No.: 2/43 /2io/a/q (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.) zoning: E&{/eavnz?c Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address:PtE A. A,r&tfAa/,t z.,/ut ztFsT?N (a 3A1?/ Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of Applicant: Mailing Address:€drh;lzv z:tirc'e7Vfl o fatz/raT-?tr - E-maif Address; *t- uro;y'O ca/rcrst Ay Fax: 7"7 - ??2 - /t/ / oq Ot'l G-oType of Review and Fee: tr Signs tr Conceptual Review E New Constructiontr Addition Minor Alteration a) | (multFPam ily/com mercial) Minor Alteration (single-family/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request {... x tr tr $50 Plus $1.00 per square footoftotal sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or -t f----.mmerdal building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). ' /j23f Jor minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,,<--=' re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board, No Fee Fgr:ff*rF aott' cnor no., /v6 1 ey, MsliAAn-l^. -ffi lZ-7 "6f noMeeting Date: Planner: ourr y RJo f* of,t November 2,2005 TO: The Homeowners of Units 7 - l3 Eiger Chalet FM: JeffMowry Unit 14 Eiger Chalet RE: Vail DRB Request for Home Owner Approval The Design Review Board has requested that I notii/ each home owner in ou, group-of eight homes regarding my request of the city to allow me to do the following to the front of my unit: .addatwo-step.landingtoreplacethehazardouslyslopingasphaltin front of mY front door; and, . convert the wooden planter in the front oimy unit to a concrete planter and eventually cap it with Wyoming Purple Moss rock' Attached is a photo of my entry and a construction schematic' If you have no objection to my going ahead with this project would you pleas"signbelowonthelineadjacenttoyourunitnumber.Inadvance, thank you for Your consideration' Sincerely, JeffMowry Unit# 7 Unit # 8 Unit # 9 Unit# ll Unit # 12 Unit # 13 Unit #10 November 2,2005 TO: The Homeowners of Units 7 - 13 Eiger Chalet FM: Jeff Mowry Unit 14 Eiger Chalet RE: Vail DRB Request for Home Owner Approval The Design Review Board has requested that I notify each home owner in our group of eight homes regarding my request of the City to allow me to do the following to the front of my unit: . add a two-step-landing to replace the hazardously sloping asphalt in front of my front door; and, . convert the wooden planter in the front of my unit to a concrete planter and eventually cap it with Wyoming Purple Moss rock. Attached is a photo of my entry and a construction schematic. If you have no objection to my going ahead with this project would you please sign below on the line adjacent to your unit number. In advance, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, JeffMowry Unit# 7 unit # 8 Unit# 9 Unit #10 Unit # Unit # Unit # H*,:* 6'1*l! 1 Y:' L! ,, ;;''A/., y',/ n//',*/( "/t;f"[l rrr /'. gl t2 'l , t ./ ,r'-/'"' ,y', * November 2,2005 TO: The Homeowners of Units 7 - i3 Eiger Chalet FM: Jeff Mowry Unit 14 Eiger Chalet RE: Vail DRB Request for Home Owner Approval The Design Review Board has requested that I notify each home owner in ;;;t"d.f eight homes regarding my request of the city to allow me to do the following to the front of my unit: . add a two-step-landing to replace the hazardously sloping asphalt in front of mY front door; and, . convert the wooden planter in the front of my unit to a concrete planter and eventually cap it with Wyoming Purple Moss rock' Attached is a photo of my entry and a construction schematic' If you have no objection to my going ahead with this project would you ptease sign below on the line adiacent to your unit number' In advance' ihunk you for Your consideration' Sincerely, JeffMowry Unit # 7 Unit # 8 Unit # 9 Unit #10 Unit # Unit Unit #13 1l PROPOSED MATERIALS Buildino lrlaterials Tvpe of Material Color Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Sotrits Wndows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting -- Other 0cwez e-E Notes: Please speciff the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. 6,/ Fr- F4edjrTruf ? u"t y' ,3;r ti/t c- .:''t -'f'l tlut z<: Page 6 of L3l06lo6los . Proposed surface drainage on and off-site.r Location of landscaped areas.r Location of limits of disturbance fencingr Location ofall required parking spaces. Snow storage areas.r Proposed dumpster location and detail of dumpster enclosure.r Retaining walls with proposed elevations at top and bottom of walls. A detailed cross-section and elevation drawings shall be provided on the plan or sepamte sheet. Starnped engineering drawings are requircd for walls between 4, and 6'feet in height,. Delineate areas to be phased and appropriate timing, if applicable o landscape plan; . Scale of 1' = 20'or largero Landscape plan must be drawn at the sarne scale as the sibe plan.r Location of existing trees, 4" diameter or larger, Indicate trees to remain, to be reloeted (including new location), and to be removed. Large stands of trees may be shown (as bubble) if the strand is not being affected by the proposed improvements and grading.. Indicate all existing ground cover and shrubs.o Detailed legend, listing the type and size (caliper for deciduous trees, height for conifers, gallon size for shrubs and height for foundation shrubs) of all the existing and proposed plant material including ground cover.o Delineate critical root zones for existing trees in close proximity to site grading and construction.r Indicate the location of all proposed plantings. The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be employed in caring for plant material following its installation.. Existing and proposed contour lines. Retaining walls shall be included with the top of wall and the bottom of wall elevations noted. r Lighting Plan:e Indicate type, location and number of fixtures,o Include height above.grade, lumens output, luminous arear Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture. r REPATNTPROPOSALS r For all proposals to repaint existing buildings, the following supplemental information is required: . Color chip or color sample including the manufacturer name and color number(s). Architectural elevation drawings which clearly indicate the locaUon of proposed colors (ie. siding, stucco, window trim, doors, fascia. soffiits, ek.) Page 5 of 13/05/06/05 *********+****+****{.:t **********:r.*1.**,i*+**:t*:t:t,t!t**+***********:*:r*******+,fi**i.,i<*!t<:t ******:t:t ++*** TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statement ***t*'**********++++**********************++*'1.***********+***r.,1.**************1.:'t'krt*:r*)r"r***+'k,1.:t * Statement Number: R050001835 Amount: $50.00 t0 / 3L / 20050L':22 pNl Payment Method: check MOWRY Init: JS Notation: 1462/AUBERT Permit No: Parcel No: Site Address : Location: This Palment: DR8050589 Type: DRB-Minor A1t, Comm/Mu1Ei 2103-121-030L-4 1350 SAI1IDSTONE DR VAIL EIGER CHALETS #14 Tota1 Fees: Total ALL Pmts: Balance: $s0.00 $s0.00 $so. oo ******************+*******++{.*****'}*,**:************************************d<****'t<++{.tt ******** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code De6cription Current Pmts DR 00100003rr2200 DESIGN REVIEW FEES s0.00 \\ dR\ - ..t \. \\J $$*tr S ,gR\\q s.U \o.lr \\ \ IV) \\ N l1 \ : (,. I-t\L* r \. N\ N $ 'aa\ N \Il- r\ rT I I I I \ \ ).1rS \|- \ b\I $ q B A 's \\s\s. $i {\ hq Oo TOWN Of. VAIL DESifrl"l RI;VIEW STT r '',i,;:-TOVAL $iG tiJ s$\ '') R L,( tlf{ !'\I\ St\ K}r.\ \\\ N \ \' .J \) s )\$ sl \ \ I t\ ,.}r{ r$ l\ 'Nr\ S.r \\\r \.)t$$I'U\rhll t\.'I *- ->lr I f,tt* q: -{ .$ r)$Y ,$ \ rYl + *\ * r$ i:\gl { \, -r N\ \*ts\* \ \iFlfr \N Page I ofl Warren Campbell - Re: Design Review Application From: To: Date: Subject: <aj mvail @comcast.net> "Warren Campbell" <WCampbell@vailgov.com> 12/1312005 3:50 PM Re: Design Review Application Hi Warren, Thanks for your email. I've been busy with a number of things but I've been working on it. The out-of- towners require use of snail mail and Helmut has been in Germany. However, I will get back to you before January 9th. Have a great Holidays. Jeff Original message From: "Waren Campbell" <WCampbell@vailgov. com> >Mr Mowry, > I am writng to see how you are coming on getting the adjacent > signatures for your Desigr review application. If you are unable to get > these signatures by January 9th I will withdraw your application and > mail it back to you and you can resubmit when you are ready. > Thanks > Warren Campbell > Planner > Town of Vail file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\GW)00001.HTM 1211412005