HomeMy WebLinkAboutEleni Zneimer Lot 5 pages 51-100 LEGALsS •
Landscape - 902 Bollard Page 1 of 3
1$ ftm Lwft P. M-1
STANDARD PRODUCTS - LANDSCAPE Cr0r,1%
PDF Files: Catalog Page - Technical Spe-c- Mcations - InstaNation Instruction - Photometrics I Zip File: IES_Files
902 Bollard
I
Solid bronze and copper construction provide maintenance -free
finishes.
Electronic ballasts are standard for CF lamping and provide low temp
starting.
Available with low wattage metal halide lamping.
Companion garden light available.
SMITH RANCH HOMES
NOVATO,CA
LARCH: ROYSTON, HANAMOTO, ALLEY &
ABEY
EE: HANSEN & SAUGHTER
LTG. DESIGN: AUERBACH & GLASOW
SHOWN WITH OPTIONAL "HIPPED HOOD ")
APPROVED E
TOWN OF VAIL
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE-
PLANNER: .
httn:// shanerlitihtinti.com/cataloizs /slanO4.htm 5/23/2003
FRANCISCAN WINERY
OAKVILLE, CA
ARCH: BCV ARCHITECTS /LEONG ARCHITECTS
LANDSCAPE ARCH: FREDERIKA MOLLER
LTG. DES: L.I.T., INC.
andscape - 902 Bollard Page 2 of 3
LAMPS / BALLASTS
Incandescent: 1 - 10OW max (A -19).
Fluorescent: 1 compact 26W (F26TTT) or 42W (F42TTT).
H.I.D.: 1- 50W or 70W metal halide, or
1- 50W or 70W high pressure sodium. (ED17, medium base).
Specify voltage. Incandescent available 120V only.
For H.I.D., ballasts are High Power Factor (HPF) thermally protected and outdoor - rated. For fluorescent, Electronic Ballasts
are standard. 4 -PIN LAMPS REQUIRED. See "Ballasts" and "Lamps" in Section G. Lamps by others. See "User Guide" for
information on starting temperatures of fluorescent fixtures.
MATERIALS / FIXTURE LOCATION
U.L. listed for wet location. Hood, support arms and post are solid copper. Fixture body and mounting base are Sand Cast
Bronze.
FINISHES
Diffuser: Clear Glass, inside sanded.
Base & Body: Sand Cast Bronze (weathers to a dark
patina).
Hood, Arms, Post:
NCP - Natural Copper (weathers to a dark patina).
VG - Verdi -Cris
CC - Custom Color, Semi -Gloss
SZ - Satin Zinc
MOUNTING
Overall bollard height is 36" standard. Specify other, (ex:
28 "OA).
Post is wireway; wire is made up below removable head.
Conduit enters at center of base plate. Anchor bolts and
template are supplied with fixture.
10
12.Eml
e
Cast base is standard mounting, supplied with anchor bolts and
template.
OPTIONS
For perforated metal
brightness baffle, specify
suffix fMt1.
Available with 12" diameter
hood, specify suffix 13.
Its
Avail,oble with hipped hood,l
specify suffix HH.
NOTES
For photometric data, see Section H.
14 112"0 hood available.
FOUNDATION FOR DESIGN
littp:Hshaperlighting.com /catalogs /slanO4.htm 5/23/2003
y
Rectangular recessed wall luminaires
esigned for low mounting heights for the illumination of steps,
fairs, ramps, aisles and other locations, indoor and outdoor,
vhere guidance and security lighting is required.
lousing: Constructed of die cast and extruded aluminum components
vith integral wiring compartment. Mounting tabs provided.
nclosure: One piece die cast aluminum faceplate. Clear tempered
glass; .157' thick etched (behind louvers), .125' thick, machined flush
faceplate surface (slot), .157" thick with translucent white ceramic
oating, machined flush to faceplate surface (open). Faceplate is
ecured by four (4) flush, socket head, stainless steel captive screws
xeaded into stainless steel inserts in the housing casting. Continuous high
mperature, molded silicone rubber gasket for weather tight operation.
lectrical: Compact fluorescent lampholder: 2G11, 4 -pin, rated
5W, 600V. Ballast: Electronic, HPF for 0° F starting, available in
20V or 277V - specify.
hrough Wiring: Maximum four (4) No. 12 AWG conductors (plus ground)
uitable for 75 °C. Two 1 /8" knockouts provided for 1 /z' conduit.
inish: Standard finish is an eight step process consisting of a black
r white textured powder coating over a phosphate base.
ustom colors supplied on special order.
L. listed, suitable for wet locations and for installation within 3 feet of
round. Suitable for all types of construction, including poured concrete.
YLmw.. L "d" h uesx` d Q
I
I
BEGA
Horizontal recessed luminaire with
B die cast aluminum louvers.
Etched tempered glass diffuser.
Suitable for wet locations.
A Electronic ballast for 0°F starting.
t-!ttr
Color: Black or white.
Lamp Lumen A B C
2226P Recessed W 1 18W PLL 2G11 1200 13 4 4
3126P Recessed /M1 1 27W PLL 2G11 1800 16 4 4
3125P Recessed OW 1 39W PLL 2G11 2500 20 4 4
BEGA
t
TEKA
I L L U M I N A T I O N
T39
BEACON SATURN PENDANT
I I__ -1
r1
J
24"
8 „
Description... Exterior / Interior stem mounted PRODUCT # Lamp Rings Finish Option
luminaire BSP- 2046/Natural 15OW A19 S.S. Brown Patina
Materials / Construction...BSP- 2016/Natural 15OW A19 Copper Brown Patina
A. Cast bronze cap BSP- 2066/Nickel` 15OW A19 S.S. None
B. Heavy pure copper shade Nickel plate
C. Stainless steel or copper on S.S. ring stacks
D. Solid brass spacers Note... Longer stem lengths up to 10 feet, available at
E. Pure copper glass retainer w/ clear glass disk additional cost - specifyF. Clear glass cylinder
G. Pure copper lampholder cover U.L. listed, suitable for wet locations
H. Stainless steel screws APPROVED BY THEI. 28 degree swivel, hang straight canopy
J. Pure brass stem - 1/4" IPS TOWN OF VAIL
DESI GN R EVIEW BOARDMounting... Recessed 4" octagonal wiring box
ODATE: S
PLANNER: `UV
TEKA ILLUMINATION, INC. 86 GIBSON ROAD, SUITE 3 TEMPLETON, CALIFORNIA 93465 PHONE (805) 434-3511 FAX (805) 434 -3512
0 TEKA 6/98
TEKA
I L L U M I N A T I O N
T23
CLASSIC SATURN WALL
51/4"
G
51/4"
10"
Description... Exterior wall mounted luminaire
Materials / Construction...
A. Cast bronze cap
B. Heavy pure copper shade
C. Stainless steel or copper on S.S. ring stack
D. Solid brass spacers
E. Cast aluminum wall plate w/ pure copper cover
PRODUCT
7 NIB"
Lamp Rings Finish Option
CSW- 8046/Natural 100W A19 S.S. Brown Patina
CSW- 8016/Natural 100W A19 Copper Brown Patina
CSW- 8066/Nickel' 100W A19 S.S. None
Nickel plate
F. Heavy pure copper stem - 7/8 O.D.
U.L. listed, suitable for wet locationsG.Pure copper glass retainer w/ clear glass disk
H. Clear glass cylinder
APPROVED BY THEI. Pure copper lampholder cover
Mounting... Recessed 4" octagonal wiring box
TOWN OF VAIL
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE: - 6- D
PLANNER: 41L
TEKA ILLUMINATION, INC. 86 GIBSON ROAD, SUITE 3 TEMPLETON, CALIFORNIA 93465 PHONE (805) 434-3511 FAX (805) 434 -3512
C TEKA 6/98
17"
x
ml
lk
Q ;,
rn
O
rt
ro
EL
ov
O
o
N ^
O
V?
W
O
n
O
n
rt
W
w
0- '
O
n
N .
rD
w
1
G
Q
Q
w
w
rD
n.
w
an
O
o.
a
ro
O
n
y
O
n
a
rD
N
W
w
w
CL :'
rD
rD
rD (
A
w
n
W
o
10
w
rD
cn
O
p
b
n
O
w
w
R
w
0
N
rD
OG
On
v
p
j
p
O
w
p
c
p
O =.
O
O
O
G (
D
Q'
w
O (
D
b
rD
X
rr
w
v
cn
w
rrD .
A
o
O
E;Z
Q
n
C"
y
ay
6
C
f0
R f0
y
p
C
Q •
y
t
1
1
p
n
O
h
mss.
x
a
7777,
S
rti. 'o:
zr
@ :
I _o
k
1 4
o
N M
O O O a) mUa > U .°
2c 02
N O 0 ._ O a40C/5
ao0.0
N N N ('M M
ON
Oal
O
D :][: EL
N
O M
O
d
N N
N
O M
O
d
N
N
O
U
0
LL.
I
V
M
a
o
3
OI
O o
R N °O U
oZNOZ
I M N O M
0 V N N
M 'o cO h' 0
Iao0
N N N CO M
ac
O
p i
O a —I O
C14
a o o Q a — o _0 a Lo
aZZZ `p-
Cl)
a Z I I I— Z McI
v>
O v v Z77
C14 M V C? ^ o 1.?
m Q
V , o , ON070`O—NMR-) -O
NNNNNN
MI
M
O
O Z p p O O
Z
I to I M M M
H d' N N N E <
N V N N = aCCIMOV [O U
Of000'O ^NM cw
N
Q
E
Z cn
C) j
O O Q
5 Z Z 6
0 0 I 0
a I
I N I p J
N N — d
o LO V W O
C`J M V H 00
L
y
fA
a
0 1 T -1 Z -1 (D OCTmommp mQ < p
5 —•
7 N
D > >Q 5 Q Q
O <n
N 3 ° cn (D Q 3 o QQcn — (D (D <no0ccnQ °°_ <
D O N Q Q n a ,Q_OnO _ O p T
O - n C GO O Q_3Q_ OQ
O p F- O C(D) OA 7 o-5 5 N7 =.
O c T N. - 0 CO y Co ( CZcQ3(D Q_ Q O p Q
X
Q O Q p T Q— (D (Q --O_ (D (p (D
N O Q (D S p yQ
D 0 O ZQ < cn_ O' 7
D 3 `^ Q (D Q Q. s
p (D (D Q (D
0 — (D - 0 (D ODOQOSu' p O Q cn ('DQp
D OQ ('D p N Q'O.CT Q_ En NQN to7m (D
3 p Q_ Q_Q
Q_D (D T
D N Q
O Q — Q N
D < Q n
O (Q
iwdl a!yp.c _
w Q (
D (D
O
M
Q cn Q c"
O c
D3 g
DP- m 3 Q
D Q
O Orl T (DQ -0
n (D
L
y
fA
a
W
1
0
I *1
0
a0co
v151
oCC,
O
z
CL
i-
wZ
L
cl)
w
uj
ti
ItO
0
a
0.
a0coW .
o
LLo
5;o
CC,
O
z
CL
i-
wZ
L
cl)
w
uj
ti
Z
0
a
0.
1
1r
0WQJ
m
m
LLO3
r. (
r.
O
ZaF "
CCz
z
Q
W
za.
o
c
liIN
OWN, ; ,
tt
AidAN/
1
i-
mw "
N
W.
4
1&
40
As
EL
WP
MEN =
MA
pl,
3Ny t
nJ
i
t
0
J INv
iE
r
JLL _oi
lu,
H0.
w
W
Z
O
p
M
COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW
architects
June 16, 2003
Mr. Warren Campbell
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Brandt Residence Final Review Submittal
Dear Warren:
Please find attached revised architectural plans, dated 6/14/03, which are supplemental to our Final Review
Submission dated 5/28/03 for the Brandt residence. This package also addresses your updated comments in
your letter dated June 12, 2003 as follows:
Two copies of stamped topographic plan, dated 6/11/2003.
L1 -0 Revised Landscape Plan showing new limits of construction, snow storage, and developer provide
retaining walls at the road (northeast corner of lot.)
L2 -0 Revised Planting Plan within limits of construction.
L3 -0 Landscape Lighting Plan (unchanged)
A10.1 -A10.3 Architectural Lighting Plans
Light Fixture schedule
Exterior Finish Materials
If there are any outstanding items you would like me to bring to the meeting on June 18, 2003, please do
not hesitate to call at 748 -1516 x14.
Regards,
J, 0 .
Ann C. Darby, AIA
Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
VAIL: Post Office Box 6337 Avon, CO 81620 www.cgyarchitects.com
tel 970.748.1516 fax 970.748.1518 email: vail @cgyarchitects.com
ASPEN TELLURIDE VAIL (
11
TOWN OF VAIL L%
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970 - 479 -2138
FAX 970 - 479 -2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
c/o Ann Darby
P.O. Box 6337
Avon, CO 81620
June 12, 2003
Re: Brandt Residence updated comments located at 1701 E Buffehr Creek Road /Lots 5,
Eleni Zneimer Subdivision
Ms. Darby:
This letter is being sent to inform you of several comments and questions the Community
Development Department staff have regarding your submittal for the Brandt Residence locatedat1701EBuffehrCreekRoad. This letter includes all the comments from the June 10 letter
with additions show in bold. The follow comments should be addressed in the materials
submitted for your final review.
After measuring the portions of the driveway which are heated and unheated staff has
determined that a snow storage area of 274 square feet is required. Please submitted a
plan showing the location of 274 square of designated snow storage area. Please
remember that landscaping is not to occur in the area designated for snow storage
Please submit details on the proposed water feature on the west side of the house.
Renderings or photos of existing waterfalls will work to depict how the finished project istolook. Is there a water feature near the front entry of the home? If so please provide
details or explain what the symbols are.
Please submit a materials sample board.
Please provide a legible plan with the roof plan shown on top of the existing and
proposed contours, with the top of ridge elevations labeled, so that maximum height can
be determined.
Room 112 is labeled as crawlspace /storage. Please provide confirmation such as a
cross - section that confirms it meets the requirements of the Town Code for crawlspace.
Currently, I have included this room in my GRFA calculations. After review of the floor
plans staff finds that all GRFA requirements are satisfied.Please remember all access to crawlspaces are to be through openings measuring no
more than 12 square feet in area.
On the landscaping plans the disturbance fence needs to be adjusted to be on your
property along the west property line and include all retaining walls and tree plantings.Currently, there are retaining walls and landscaping proposed outside the limits of
to4) RECYCLED PAPER
disturbance fence. Staff needs to verify that all retaining wall improvements will occur on
your property and not require underground disturbance onto neighboring properties such
as soil nailing.
The lighting plan shows a total of 28 lights which meet the light guidelines requirements.Please verify there will be no more additional light by doorways, etc. All exterior lighting
sources will count towards the 28 total maximum.
In your submittal letter you assumed that I had a stamped survey of the site currently in
association with the driveway construction. The copies I have in my office are not
stamped by an engineer as required by our application submittal requirements. I am
almost sure you can get some copies from Ed Zniemer. Two copies should be
submitted.
Public Works Comments:
Town of Vail Standards require that any new grading be returned to 2:1 grade. Max
allowed is 1.5:1, and must be approved by the Design Review Board, and Town staff.
Provide a stamped approved drawing from a licensed PE for retaining walls between 4
feet and 6 feet. Keep in mind the maximum height of any retaining wall is 6 feet.
Stamped engineer drawings must be submitted at the time of submittal for abuildingpermit. The Town of Vail requires a minimum bench of 4 feet between
retaining walls. Please revise plans to meet these requirements.
Show erosion control measures on the site plan for the lower end of the site.
Adjust limits of disturbance fence to include all disturbed area.
Please review the Public Works comments provided in this letter for applicability to your project
and address them appropriately. Leonard Sandoval with the Public Works Department can be
reached at 970 - 479 -2198 if you have any questions.
Fire Department Comments:
This house is to be fire sprinkled per the requirements of the approval of the Eleni
Zniemer Subdivision.
In order to remain on the June 18, 2003 Design Review Board agenda please submit revised
plans addressing these concerns and questions adequately no later than 1:00 p.m. on MondayJune16, 2003. If all plans meet the Town of Vail zoning requirements you will be schedule on
the June 18 DRB agenda. Please review these comments and if you have any questions
regarding this letter please contact me at 970 - 479 -2148.
With regards,
M
Warren Campbe
Planner II
Cc: File
TOWN OF VAIL LY
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970- 479 -2138
FAX 970 - 479 -2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
c/o Ann Darby
P.O. Box 6337
Avon, CO 81620
Re: Brandt Residence located at 1701 E Buffehr Creek Rc
Subdivision
Ms. Darby:
This letter is being sent to inform you of several comments and questions the Community
Development Department staff have regarding your submittal for the Brandt Residence located
at 1701E Buffehr Creek Road. The follow comments should be addressed in the materials
submitted for your final review.
After measuring the portions of the driveway which are heated and unheated staff has
determined that a snow storage area of 274 square feet is required. Please submitted a
plan showing the location of 274 square of designated snow storage area. Please
remember that landscaping is not to occur in the area designated for snow storage
Please submit details on the proposed water feature on the west side of the house.
Renderings or photos of existing waterfalls will work to depict how the finished project is
to look. Is there a water feature near the front entry of the home? If so please provide
details or explain what the symbols are.
Please submit a materials sample board.
Please provide a legible plan with the roof plan shown on top of the existing and
proposed contours, with the top of ridge elevations labeled, so that maximum height can
be determined.
Room 112 is labeled as crawlspace /storage. Please provide confirmation such as a
cross - section that confirms it meets the requirements of the Town Code for crawlspace.
Currently, I have included this room in my GRFA calculations. After review of the floor
plans staff finds that all GRFA requirements are satisfied.
Please remember all access to crawlspaces are to be through openings measuring no
more than 12 square feet in area.
On the landscaping plans the disturbance fence needs to be adjusted to be on your
property along the west property line and include all retaining walls and tree plantings.
Currently, there are retaining walls and landscaping proposed outside the limits of
disturbance fence. Staff needs to verify that all retaining wall improvements will occur on
4M RECYCLEDPAPER
your property and not require underground disturbance onto neighboring properties such
as soil nailing.
The lighting plan shows a total of 28 lights which meet the light guidelines requirements.
Please verify there will be no more additional light by doorways, etc. All exterior lighting
sources will count towards the 28 total maximum.
In your submittal letter you assumed that I had a stamped survey of the site currently in
association with the driveway construction. The copies I have in my office are not
stamped by an engineer as required by our application submittal requirements. I am
almost sure you can get some copies from Ed Zniemer. Two copies should be
submitted.
Public Works Comments:
Town of Vail Standards require that any new grading be returned to 2:1 grade. Max
allowed is 1.5:1, and must be approved by the Design Review Board, and Town staff.
Provide a stamped approved drawing from a licensed PE for retaining walls between 4
feet and 6 feet. Keep in mind the maximum height of any retaining wall is 6 feet.
The Public Works comments are only general in nature at the time of the writing of this letter
and typically apply to all projects. Due to the flooding in East Vail the review of projects has
fallen behind as many in Public Works were assisting in trying to control the flood waters. In an
effort to get you comments as quickly as possible this letter is being sent without specificcommentsfromPublicWorks. As soon as I receive specific comments I will forward them on to
you. Leonard Sandoval with the Public Works Department can be reached at 970 - 479 -2198 ifyouhaveanyquestions. Please review the Public Works comments provided in this letter for
applicability to your project and address them appropriately.
Fire Department Comments:
This house is to be fire sprinkled per the requirements of the approval of the Eleni
Zniemer Subdivision.
In order to remain on the June 18, 2003 Design Review Board agenda please submit revised
plans addressing these concerns and questions adequately no later than 1:00 p.m. on MondayJune16, 2003. If all plans meet the Town of Vail zoning requirements you will be schedule on
the June 18` DRB agenda. Please review these comments and if you have any questions
regarding this letter please contact me at 970- 479 -2148.
With regards,
Warren Campbell
Planner II
Cc: File
Confirmation Report— Memory Send
Page : 001
Date & Time: Jun -10 -03 03:46pm
Line 1 9704792452
E -mail
Machine ID TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Job number 255
Date Jun -10 03:45pm
To $97481518
Number of pages 003
Start time Jun -10 03:45pm
End time Jun -10 03:46pm
Pages sent 003
Status OK
Job number 255* SEND SUCCESSFUL
TOWN OF PAIL
75 Soutlz FrontaSe Road
Vail, CO 81657
970- 4-79 -2 13 S
FAX 970- 479 -2452
CO
DLyELOPMNT FAX TRAIVSNlITTAL SHEET
COMPANY NA.ME-
J ]
FAX TELEPHONY NUMBER_ ` g+ s
DATE- "— to —p3 z-nvrE- `I -
d# OF PAGES 1N DOCU1vLENT SNOT 7NCL'[TDING COVER SHEET)
RESPONSE REQUIRED?
SfiNTBY w .z C'tr .r
TOWN OF VAIL. COMMUNITY DIEV"ELOPNl7 -iNT FAX # 7oa9 -zasz
TOWN OF 'NA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TELEYRONE # 970- 479 -2138
SPECIAL COly11VLFNTB AND NOTES:
p:g V L'AYONFiF'Ot2MSFa.xS6
0 0
COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW
architects
Mr. Warren Campbell
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Brandt Residence Final Review Submittal
Dear Warren:
Please find attached our Final DRB Review Application and 3 copies of architectural and landscape
drawings, as requested by the Town of Vail. The construction documents do not include a topographical
survey, as I assume you have a more recent version including the survey information for the berm. The
grading plan, L -1.0 shows current conditions and final grading within the Lot D -1 property line only.
As exterior finishes and materials will be approved by the client in a meeting 5/28/03, I am not including
actual samples, but I have included an exterior finish schedule for your records. I will submit an exterior
finish color board at the end of this week, based on client approval.
Regards,
Ann C. Darby, AIA
Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
N:\active projects \03320- brandt \padmin\approvals \tov dre final 5- 27- 03.doc
VA L: Post Office Box 6337 Avon, CO 81620 www.cgyarchitects.com
tel 970.748.1516 fax 970.748.1518 email: vail @cgyarchitects.com
ASPEN TELLURIDE VAIL rrr(
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROUTING FORM
Routed To:Leonard Sandoval, PW Mike
McGee VFD
Date Routed:4/16/03
Routed By:Planner Warren
Date Due:6/9/03
Project Name: Brandt Residence
Project #: Pro'03 -0170
Activity #: DRB03 -0181
Description of work: Construction of a new single-family house.
Address: 1701 E Buffher Creek Road
Legal: Lot: 5 Block: Subdivision: I Eleni Zneimer Subdivison
Status:
Approved , Approved with conditions Denied
Comments:
1,
Date Reviewed:
AI-4 ,4,4;1; -nnl rnwilMAI by FIrP nPngrtmP.nt_
u 1 IIG G CAI UIIVI IL wvavv. • - - --
a
r
w
dt
C
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
T01,1i11 (1T"JTj 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
VYIV O V 1L tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Brandt Residence Conceptual DRB Number: DRB030090
Project Description:
New single family with EHU and attached 3 car garage
Participants:
OWNER Scott And Claudine Brandt 04/04/2003 Phone: 303 - 864 -9016
1200 N Lafayette St
Denver, CO
80218
License:
APPLICANT Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architec04 /04/2003 Phone: 748 -1516 x14
POB6337
Avon, CO
Adarby @cgyarchitects.com 81620
License:
Project Address: 1726 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL Location:
1726 Buffehr Creek Road
Legal Description: Lot: 5 Block: Subdivision: Eleni Zniemer
Parcel Number: 210312200007
Comments: Conceptual Review
BOARD /STAFF ACTION
Action: CONCEPT
Conditions:
Cond:200
A conceptual review is NOT a Design Review Board approval.
Planner: Warren Campbell
79:57am From-
j . 'i
4
T 00 OF VAIL'
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development75SouthFrontageRoad, Vail, Colorado 81657
tei:970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2
web: www.ci_vaii.ca.us
General Information:
Ail projects requiring design rments or he particular pproval that
submitting building
u requestedAn applicationafortDesign Review
refer to the submittal require
cannot be accepted until all' requir infy the Town Councildabd /ohethe Planni andeEnv:monmental Commission.
project may also need to be re permit is issued and construction commences withinDesignreviewapprovallapsesunlessabuilding
one year of the approval.
Description of the Request
Location
rII
of th ka P.I L j
Physical Address: —
Parcel No:
Zoning:
Subdivision: VA it
a f 9u ( a „JD .
Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970- 328 -86 for parcel no.)
10.5i221 - , 7Lc_
IV
Name(s) of Owners) :"
Mailing Address: (2 .
Phone:
Owner(s) Signa re(s): -
Name of Applicant:
x u - - Q,, -ay • lh( 19 'mailing Address: q x
Phone•
E -mail Address: u
GaIM Fax. t7o
Type of Review and Fee:50 Pius $1.00 per square foot of total Sign area.
C Signs
No FeeConceptualReview
0 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
New Construction, $05
p Addition $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For Office Use On y: 1gY
Fee Paid: - Check l/Di2B No.:
Application Date: project No."
Planner:
a
APR 4 '003
250 For minor changes to window land sufences and
I Minor Alteration
family /commercial)reroofing, painting, additions9.
multi retaining walls, etc -to buildings and site i such as,
Minor Alteration
For minor changes
reroofing, paintin g , window additions, landscaping, fences and
single-family/duplex)retaining walls, etc.
to already approved by Planning Staff or the
1 Changes to Approved Plans 20 Far revisions plans
Design Review Board.
CD Separation Request No Fee
For Office Use On y: 1gY
Fee Paid: - Check l/Di2B No.:
Application Date: project No."
Planner:
a
APR 4 '003
i
57 am
3`tr •t JOINT PROPERTY OWNER
WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER
VIVT aFT L•-T0
9 a joint owner of property located at (address /legal
I, (print name)
kr
description) X which have
provide this letter as written approval of the plans dated
be Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvementsensubmittedtotheproposedimprovementsinclude:
to be completed at the address noted above. I "understand thatfih
r
a._a1/AALG WI tN `, KA
GAty
further understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review
nrPSS to ensure compliane.with the Town's applicable codes and regulations.
signature)
X > 0
Date)
Page 2 of 12/02/01/C
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROUTING FORM
Routed To:Leonard Sandoval, PW Mike
McGee VFD
Date Routed:4/16/03
Routed B Planner Warren
Date Due:4/14/03 ProjeZ#:DRLB03-0090
ndt Residence
Proje070
Activ
Description of work: Construction of a new single-family house.
Address: 1701 E Buffher Creek Road
Legal: Lot: 1 5 1 Block: I Subdivision: I :-leni Zneimer Subdivison
Status:
Approved Approved with conditions Denied
Comments: Date Reviewed: 4 -25 -03
F rl: KIcorl nArJi+innni raviPW by Firs- npnartment.
Keep in mind that until the access road and retaining walls are built to lot 5. There may be some
plan changes that will require further review before approval is granted.
Approval to allow landscaping and patio within utility easement is required from all Utility
companies.
PW would recommend installation of a 4 ft concrete pan at the edge of driveway to prevent
surface drainage to flow towards driveway/ ara e. Show on site plan.
Show limits of disturbance fence and provide some form of erosion control on South side of lot.
Show snow storage area.
Show all new additional boulder or retaining wall on site plan.
Provide Landscaping Plan
Show on site plan — the children play area and show top and bottom elevation of stone site wall.
Show grade elevation of garage slab on site plan.
No new grading is proposed. Keep in mind, all disturbed grading is required to return to a 2:1
slope. Show any proposed new grading on site plan.
Is
r
Hi5 LA— v,l o pne A - V
I
A
I
A
TOWN OF PAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970 - 479 -2138
FAX 970 - 479 -2452
October 7, 1999
Edward J. Zneimer, President
The Zneimer Company
P.O. Box 305
Minturn, CO 81645
Re: Parcel #2103 - 122 -00 -007 / Tract A, Lion's Ridge Filing 2
Dear Ed:
At their October 6 meeting, the Town's Design Review Board (DRB) conceptually reviewed
the above - referenced application. Following is a synopsis of the DRB's comments and direction
from the initial site plan review:
The landscaping along the retaining walls would function better on the downhill side of
each wall."
When the individual houses are developed, we suggest the use of a wall from each structure
to help retain the slope."
It was agreed that the retaining walls would be constructed with a sandstone T -block material
similar to the existing walls along Potato Patch Drive). Additionally, an area showing "the
approximate location of vegetation to phased in at a later date, subject to design review" would
be shown on the plan between envelopes 5 & 6 and Buffehr Creek Road prior to final approval.
Following are revisions requested by the Town's Public Works Department prior to final site
plan approval:
Please show all proposed grading and drainage on the final site plan. The area adjacent to the
driveway /road intersection is of particular concern.
Please show the required 5' distance between retaining walls and the access drive on the
plan.
A culvert and 4' concrete pan will be required where the access drive meets Buffehr Creek
Road. Please show these on your plan.
RECYCLEDPAPER
Mike McGee (TOV Fire Marshall) informed me that a turnaround will be required somewhere
along the access drive for emergency vehicles. Although Mike is aware of your plans to equip
each residence with fire sprinklers, he insists a turnaround is still necessary for medical
emergencies. You can reach Mike at 479 -2135 to discuss this issue in detail.
If you would like to discuss any of these items in greater detail, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 479 -2140.
Sincerely,
Brent Wilson
Planner II
P
kor ONveIOP S lo cs p
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: October 22, 1990
SUBJECT: A request for approval of a major change to the
existing development approval for the Valley, Phase VI.
Applicant: Edward Zneimer
I. INTRODUCTION
The Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) reviewed the
development proposal for The Valley, Phase VI in a work session
on September 10, 1990. From that meeting, it was apparent that
the reduction in dwelling units (from 42 to 26) and the reduction
in GRFA (from 77,150 to 65,900 sq. ft.) made the project much
better than the previous approval. The PEC did have significant
concerns, including preservation of the meadow and the impact of
the retaining walls. Those items, among others, are discussed
below.
Staff wanted to point out that this review process is unique from
most projects which the PEC reviews. The review is a requirement
of the annexation ordinance, which did not include any specific
criteria or standards which the project must meet. Because this
is not a Special Development District (SDD), the only evaluation
criteria to be used is to compare the existing, approved plan to
the proposed one. The ordinance has been attached to this memo
as Exhibit A.
The two major changes since the work session are that the
applicant reconfigured the road plan so that there is a single
intersection on Buffehr Creek Road and the applicant proposed to
delete all secondary units from the development. Staff
encouraged the applicant to maintain the option for caretaker
units in the development with the intent of creating some
employee housing. At this time, the applicant will consider
allowing the units as long as the GRFA for the caretaker is not
deducted from the available GRFA for each envelope presented at
the work session.
By allowing 800 square feet of GRFA to be used strictly for a
caretaker unit, the total GRFA for the project becomes 65,900
square feet, still 11,255 square feet less than the existing
approval. Additional GRFA may be added to the caretaker from the
amount allocated to the primary dwelling unit if it is not used
for the primary unit; however, no caretaker unit shall exceed
1200 square feet. With this approval, no caretaker units will be
1
required and none may be built. The reason the Town is not
requiring the applicant to build a certain number of these i
is because the applicant is not requesting an SDD, variance,
another review which the Town could condition the approval v
requirement to build units.
II. BACKGROUND
This review is a request for approval of a modification to t
existing development plan for Phase VI of The Valley. The
original plan was approved as a PUD by Eagle County in the fall
of 1980. That plan included 42 townhouses with a total GRFA of
77,150 sq. ft. The plan called for three clusters of units with
a group of recreation amenities (tennis courts, swimming pool,
trails, etc.). When the property was annexed by the Town of
Vail, a provision of the annexation ordinance required that any
major modification to the County approved plan would require PEC
approval. In that same ordinance, Residential Cluster (RC)
zoning was applied to this property. Under the annexation
ordinance, all standards not addressed by the Eagle County
approved plan must meet RC zoning requirements.
In 1981, a developer proposed a revised site plan which the PEC
approved. The amended plan maintained all 42 dwelling units as
well as the GRFA approved by the County and the scheme of
attached, clustered townhouses. Though that plan was never
built, it is still valid and could be built today after the
applicant received updated Design Review Board (DRB) approvals.
Both the 1980 and 1981 plans are attached at the end of this memo
as Exhibits B and C so the board can compare the 1981 plan, which
is buildable, to the proposed one.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
At this time, the applicant is proposing 13 detached single
family homes, each which may have a secondary unit. This creates
a total of 26 units. The caretaker units will be deed restricted
so that they cannot be sold separately from the primary
residences. In addition, they must meet all the requirements for
an employee unit listed in the Primary /Secondary section of the
Zoning Code (Section 18.13.080 (B)). Of the 13 buildings, six
will be located north of Buffehr Creek Road on the south facing
slope; and seven will be located across Buffehr Creek Road in the
meadow at the base of the forested slope (see attached site
plan) .
The development has been divided into three phases. The first
two phases are the east and west clusters (respectively) on the
south side of Buffehr Creek Road. The third and last will be the
six homes on the north side of the road. The structures in phase
E
F-J
one (Lots 11 -13) will each have approximately 3500 square feet of
gross residential floor area (GRFA). Each house in phase two
Lots 7 -10) and phase three (Lots 1 -6) will have approximately
4500 square feet of GRFA. This results in a total GRFA of 55,500
square feet. In addition to this amount, 10,400 square feet of
GRFA (800 x 13) may be used for caretaker units. Combining the
GRFA from the primary units with any caretaker units results in a
possible total of 65,900 square feet.
The developer is proposing a Tyrolean style of architecture, but
has the option to vary that in the future. No subdivision plat
is proposed at this time as the PEC approval is only for therevisionsinthedevelopmentplan - -a requirement of annexation.
The owner would most likely proceed with a single family
subdivision following development plan approval.
IV. ZONING ANALYSIS
The analysis compares the proposal to the most recent PEC
approval and the RC Zone District. The RC standards apply for
other development standards per the annexation ordinance.
1981 PEC Approval Current Proposal
Site Area:21.45 acres 21.45 acres
height:typical unit 32 ft. 33 ft.maximum
GRFA: 77,150 sq. ft.
DUs: 42
Density: 2 DUs /acre
Includes 13 caretaker units
55,500 sq. ft.
65,900 sq. ft.*
26*
1.2 DUs /acre*
V. STAFF COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS
A. Site Plan•
RC Zoning
21.45 acres
33 ft. maximum
59,895 sq. ft.
29.9
6 DUs /acre
maximum
1.
The proposed site plan is a major improvement to thepreviouslyapprovedplanastheimpactshavebeen
significantly reduced. The biggest difference is the
change in the number of dwelling units and decrease of
GRFA. This plan has 16 fewer units than the previous
plan. The development will appear less dense and will
3
NC.
have fewer impacts since the design has been changed
from attached dwelling units to single family homes.
The land previously devoted for guest parking, tennis
courts, and a swimming pool for the condominium complex
will now be left in its natural state. Lastly, the
current proposal has 21650 sq. ft. less GRFA than the
previous plan.
1. Building envelopes:
The proposal uses building envelopes to identify
the location of each house. The envelopes are not
proposed to be platted. There will be
approximately 40 to 80 feet between each building
envelope. Since the PEC work session, the
applicant has enlarged the envelopes toapproximately50byg0andhasdecided that eachenvelopewillbeadequateforallofthefuture
construction without developing standards for
encroachments into the open space. All roof
eaves, porches, decks, etc. will be contained
within the building envelope.
Though the envelopes have been designed toaccommodateallofthefutureconstruction, the
applicant would like to set up d process which
will allow changes, if needed. The applicant has
proposed the following language which will allowsomeflexibilityforthesitingofthehouses.
The criteria listed below will be used by the DRB
to approve any modifications to the envelopes.
Building envelopes indicated upon the
approved site plan may be modified withapprovaloftheDRBbasedupondetailedreviewofanindividualarchitecturaland
site plan for an individual dwelling unit.
The DRB shall find that the modification to
any building envelope does not substantiallyresultinanynegativeimpactsuponthesite,
adjoining property, or have any adverse
impact upon required geologic hazard
considerations. If an association of home
owners within the project is formed, any
modification of a building envelope shall
also conform to the rules and regulations
adopted by t he association. Any
modification shall not exceed 15 feet and in
no case shall any structure be built in the
20 foot setbacks shown on the app
development plan."
4
2.
3.
Open space:
The applicant has committed to preserving all the
areas outside the building envelopes as open
space. The area between the private roads and
Buffehr Creek Road will be further restricted with
this approval so that no fences or domestic -style
landscaping will be allowed. The areas will be
preserved in the natural state that exists today.The developer will be responsible for maintainingthisareauntilthedevelopmentissubdividedand,
through that process, a home owners association or
other body is created to take over the
responsibility. The spaces immediately around the
building envelopes may be "improved" with sod
lawns and fences, but no structures.
Trails•
The hiking /mountain bike trail, located on the
northwest portion of the site, runs through
building envelopes 1 and 5. It goes from Buffehr
Creek Road north to Red and White Mountain. The
Forest Service agrees that the current alignment
has not been established long enough to be
recognized legally and will take responsibility to
relocate it along the creek. The new alignment
will be on public land. The Forest Service plans
to do the construction in the summer of 1991,
which is prior to the time which the applicant
plans to construct this phase of the development.
B. Comparison to Elk Meadows
The PEC commented that this project should be designed
more along the lines of Elk Meadows, the SDD adjacent
to the site to the east. Staff believes there are
several reasons why the two sites are different and
deserve different solutions.
1- -There is a dedicated utility easement that runs
through the valley, located approximately parallel to
Buf-fehr Creek Road. The area between the road and this
utility easement varies. In Phase VI, Buffehr Creek
Road winds in and out, leaving only one building
envelope between the road and the easement. In Elk
Meadows, the road cuts to the north, leaving adequate
room for four of the five buildings.
v
5
ti,.- 1820.1
C.
2 - -The slope from the road to the meadow is much
steeper in Elk Meadows. The approved design works much
better on a steep slope because the houses can be
tucked into the slope. Even if the Elk Meadows style
of site planning could be done for Phase VI, the end
result may not be an improvement because the houses
would stick up higher and be more visible.
3 - -The rock fall hazard is more severe on the Elk
Meadows site requiring more mitigation. By placing the
houses in the slope, internal mitigation was all that
was needed.
4 -- Through the SDD process, the Elk Meadows site plan
was approved with a three foot setback from Buffehr
Creek Road right -of -way. By allowing the setback
encroachment, enough room for the construction was
created.
5 - -By placing the homes on the far side of the meadow,
the meadow that is preserved will be visible to the
public. The conditions of approval for this request
require that it be preserved in a natural state.
Roads Walls and Drainage
The road configuration has been revised since the work
session so that both access roads intersect Buffehr
Creek Road at the same location. The roads will be
private roads. The slopes range from 7.0 percent to
8.6 percent, with the driveway to lot 4 at 10 percent.
The Town's subdivision regulations allow private roads
to reach 9.0 percent slope without requiring a
variance. The driveway to lot four will require an
approval from the Town Engineer (with a possible
heating requirement), but does not require a variance.
The walls needed for the upper road do not exceed 6
feet in height. A five foot high cut wall is proposed
from the intersection approximately Half the distance
up the access road. From that point, a five foot high
fill wall will be installed for the rest of the
distance. Near the end of the road, in addition to the
fill wall, another six foot high cut wall will be
needed. See plans and sections attached to this memo.
The walls will be constructed with interlocking precast
concrete blocks, similar to those approved for Spraddle
Creek. Texture, shape, and color will be determined by
the DRB. Landscaping will be required to soften the
appearance of the walls. The planting plan should
I
4
s
f
rM
include frequent groupings
that breakup the mass. DRB
the planting plan.
above and below the walls
will give final approval to
on the lower portion of the development, no walls will
be needed. Fill will be added to the meadow, ranging
from two feet at the east end to eight feet at the west
end.
The applicants originally proposed a typical roadsectionof18feetwithtwo2footwideshoulders or
gutters. In order to proceed with this development
approval, the applicants have expanded the section to
22 feet with 2 foot gutters or shoulders. Planning
staff generally supports less asphalt. If Fire
Department and Public Works concerns can be addressed,the applicant may apply for a variance to the
subdivision standards for a reduced road width. In
that case, staff will bring the variance request to the
PEC for their review at a later date.
Drainage will be accommodated with curb
the upper road. Swales will handle the
lower road. one drainage easement will
convey the drainage off site to Buffehr
detention pond will be built, since it
recommended in the drainage study.
and gutter for
drainage on the
be required to
Creek. No
was not
Staff believes that the proposed infrastructure is
reasonable. The walls do not require variances since
no portion of the walls will exceed six feet in height.
Staff supports the road grades and widths, since they
meet the code requirements.
D. Hazards
The only hazard shown on the Town maps is high severity
rock fall. A final report by Arthur Mears states that
the houses below Buffehr Creek Road will be adequatelyprotectedwiththenewroadanddrainageswaleswhich
will be constructed for phase one. The preliminary
rock fall study used for the work session indicatedthatabermwouldberequiredinthemeadowtoprotect
the lower houses. This is no longer the case. Mears
recommended an optional berm, but also said the swale
for the road would be adequate protection.
There are only two houses above Buffehr Creek Road
which need mitigation (building envelopes 3 and 4).
The Mears report states that these structures can beprotectedwithasixfoothighrockfallfenceorby
7
Ahb-
internal mitigation within the north facing walls.
Staff believes that the internal mitigation will
preserve the natural character of The Valley muchbetterthanafencelocatedontheslopeabovethe
homes.
The applicant has pointed out that the drawing from theMearsreportshowingtheinternalmitigationprecludesnorthfacingwindowsforthefirsttwoandpossiblythe
third floors (See exhibit D). One possible solution is
to zig zag the floor plans, installing east and west
facing windows which will allow light into the rooms on
the north side of the two houses. Staff believes that
this architectural constraint is reasonable, given the
alternative of an unsightly, 330 foot long fence.
E. Density
The proposed density, assuming every secondary unit
would be built, is approximately two thirds of the
previous approval and less than what RC zoning would
allow. The GRFA will be approximately two thirds of
the previous approval (a change from 77,150 sq. ft. to
65,900 sq. ft.) and is also under the RC maximum.
Staff's opinion is that the proposal is clearly areductioninimpactsfromthepreviousapprovaland isamuchbettersolutionforthedevelopmentofthesite.
F. Architectural guidelines
The applicant plans to build Tyrolean style homes, but
would like to leave the architectural decisions to the
DRB and does not intend to draw up any guidelines at
this time. The Town typically requires specific plans,
like architectural guidelines, in SDD reviews. But
since this review is a fulfillment of an annexation
requirement and is not an SDD, staff can support the
position of the applicant.
G. Phasing plans
Staff believes that the longer portions of this site
remain as meadow, the better. To achieve that goal,
staff recommends that one phase be completed before
another is begun. The improvements that will be
constructed in each phase include the houses, drainage
facilities, roads, utilities, and landscaping. These
improvements must be completed in each phase prior to
construction starting in another phase. The
improvements must be built from Buffehr Creek Road toanyunitunderconstructionpriortotheissuanceof
any Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate
of Occupancy. If occupancy is requested prior to the
installation of any improvements, the applicant must
escrow 125% of the construction costs prior to the Town
issuing a T.C.O.
The applicant may adhere to the plan described above
for phasing and financial guarantees or may, through a
subdivision process, choose to comply with the stricter
regulations on financial guarantees. At a minimum, the
requirements of this approval must be followed.
H. Fire Department concerns
Fire department concerns include the turn around area
in the cul -de -sacs and the access to lot 4. The turn
around areas appear to be adequate, but as a condition
of approval, the Fire Department will need to see
engineering drawings of the cul -de -sacs showing that
each meet the minimum turning distances.
The concerns regarding lot 4 are that the driveway is
too steep for a fire truck to climb, resulting in
excessive distance from the fire truck location to all
points on the perimeter of the building. The applicant
has options, including sprinkling the building, to meet
the fire code. Ensuring adequate fire protection for
lot four will be another condition of approval.
VI. CONCLUSION
Staff supports the development plan because it results in less
density and a better site plan than the 1981 approval. Though
there will be a significant loss of meadow from what exists
today, staff believes that there will be more meadow when this
development is built out than what would have been left with the
previous approval. Therefore, planning staff recommends approval
of this development plan with the following conditions:
Bold type is changes made by PEC at meeting)
1) Prior to the Town approving any building permits for this
development, the applicant shall provide to the Fire
Department:
a -- engineering drawings showing adequate turning
distances for each of the cul -de -sacs, and
b -- a mitigation plan for lot 4, which may include
sprinkling, which meets the Fire Department
requirements.
0
z
a
t
2)
4W
Except for the area within building envelopes 5 and 6, the
applicant shall restrict the open spaces between the access
roads and Buffehr Creek Road so that no structures
including fences, sheds, or accessory buildings) shall be
built in this area. In addition, no landscaping shall be
planted in the area that is inconsistent with the existing
native landscaping.
3) The applicant shall design all driveways so that the
simplest, most direct means of access to the site is
provided. Driveways that wind up the hillside to gain
elevation shall not be approved.
4) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant
shall dedicate a drainage easement, final drainage report,
and final road engineering to the Town of Vail which meets
the standards of the Public Works department.
5) Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancies or temporary
certificate of occupancies for building envelopes 1 through
6, the applicant shall install the proposed landscaping to
mitigate the appearance of the walls. In addition, the
applicant must provide a financial guarantee to the Town for
the period of two winters to be used for landscape
replacement.
6) Prior to issuance of building permits for building envelopes
3 or 4, the applicant shall submit plans showing that the
proposed building meets the internal mitigation requirements
of the Mear's report dated September, 1990.
7) The applicant has the option of including a caretaker unit
within each structure using an additional 800 sq. ft. of
GRFA to the amount allocated to each building envelope for
the caretaker unit. The units must comply with Section
18.13.080 (B). Up to 400 square feet of unused GRFA from
the primary unit may be transferred to the caretaker unit,
however, no caretaker unit shall exceed 1200 sq. ft.
8) The applicant shall design all retaining walls located in
the front yard setback with terracing so that none exceed
three feet in height.
9) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or a
temporary certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall
construct all improvements from Buffer Creek Road to the
unit under construction. If occupancy is requested prior to
the installation of any improvements, the applicant must
escrow 125% of the construction cost prior to the Town
issuing a C.O. or T.C.O. Improvements in this case shall
include landscaping, wall construction, roads, drainage, and
utilities.
10
W Voe
10) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this
development, the applicant shall provide a letter from the
Forest Service guaranteeing the reconstruction of the trail
that crosses this property.
11) Prior to the issuance of C.O.'s or T.C.O.'s for building
envelopes 5 and 6, the applicant shall plant a densely
vegetated slope of landscaping between those construction
sites and Buffer Creek Road. This landscaping shall extend
from the construction area all the way east to the
intersection.
12) The applicant has the option to reduce the length of the
upper road and locate the cul de sac further to the east.
11
F N OF VAIL
FRONTAGE ROAD
L, CO 81657
70- 479 -2138
1A -
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
PROJECT TITLE:
NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT Permit #: B03 -0209
Job Address: 1701 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL Status ...: ISSUED
Location.....: 1701 Bueffer Creek Rd Applied .. :
Parcel No...: 210312215005 Issued . .: 09/22/2003
Project No -" 9—To 3 _U ( Expires. .: 03/20/2004
OWNER Brandt Scott A. & Claudine 508/07/2003 Phone:
1200 Lafayette St
Denver Co
80218
License:
CONTRACTOR INTEGRATED RESOURCES LLC 08/07/2003 Phone: 970 - 827 -5634
PO BOX 639
MINTURN CO
81645
License: 197 -A
APPLICANT INTEGRATED RESOURCES LLC
PO BOX 639
MINTURN CO
81645
License: 197 -A
Desciption: New Single Family Rsidence with EHU
Occupancy Type
Totals...
Number of Dwelling Units: 2
08/07/2003 Phone: 970 - 827 -5634
Factor Sq Feet Valuation
4,437 $2,236,460.00*
Town of Vail Adjusted Valuation: 2,236,460.00
Fireplace Information: Restricted: y # of Gas Appliances: 0 # of Gas Logs: 2 # of Wood Pallet: 0
FEE SUMMARY ############################ # # # # # # # # # # # # # * # * # # # # # # # # # # # # # #*
Building ------ > $10,123.80 Restuarant Plan Review - ->0.00 Total Calculated Fees - - - - ->18,038.37
Plan Check - - -> $6,580.47 DRB Fee ------------------- >0.00 Additional Fees------ - - - - ->0.00
Investigation -> $0.00 Recreation Fee------ - - - - ->1,331.10 Total Permit Fee ------- - - ->18,038.37
Will Call - - - - -> $3.00 Clean -up Deposit ---- --0.00 Payments------ - - -- ->18,038.37
TOTAL FEES--- - - --->18,038.37 BALANCE DUE --------- >0.00
ipprovals:
tem: 05100 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
09/12/2003 9cd Action: AP
Item: 05400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
09/05/2003 Warren Action: AP
Ctem: 05600 FIRE DEPARTMENT
Stem: 05500 PUBLIC WORKS
09/12/2003 is Action: AP
Item: 05550 ENGINEERING
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
PAGE 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit #: B03 -0209 as of 09 -22 -2003 Status: ISSUED
Permit Type: NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT Applied:
Applicant: INTEGRATED RESOURCES LLC Issued: 09/22/2003
Job Address: 1701 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL
Location: 1701 Bueffer Creek Rd
Parcel No: 210312215005
CONDITIONS
Cond: 33
PLAN) THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRED A SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SUCH SURVEY SHALL
BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR A FRAME INSPECTION.
Cond: 12
BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
Cond: 11
PLAN): NO CRAWL SPACES SHALL HAVE A HEAD HEIGHT GREATER THAN 5 FEET AS
MEASURED FROM THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE STRUCTURAL FLOOR
MEMBERS OF THE FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY ABOVE.
Cond: 2
PLAN): Maximum retaining wall height shall not exceed 3 feet in the front
setback or 6 feet elsewhere on the property. DRB approval is required for all
walls.
Cond: 5
PLAN): PRIOR TO THE TOWN BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDUCTING A FRAMING INSPECTION,
AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A MINIMUM OF FORTY -EIGHT HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE
REQUESTED INSPECTION. ROOF RIDGES AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE INDICATED ON
THE ILC.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, filled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan,
and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all
Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoning and subdivision codes, design review
approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable thereto.
REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY -FOUR
OR
TELEPHONE AT 479 -2149 OR AT OUR OFFICE FROM 8:00 AM - 4 PM.
FOR OMSELF AND OWNEF
4 w
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement
Statement Number:R030004735 Amount: $18,038.3709/22 /200311:54 AM
Payment Method:Check Init: DDG
Notation: Integrated
Resources, JV,LLC 1112
Permit No:B03 -0209 Type:NEW (SFR,P /S,DUP) PERMIT
Parcel No:210312215005
Site Address:1701 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL
Location:1701 Bueffer Creek Rd
Total Fees: $18,038.37
This Payment:18,038.37 Total ALL Pmts: $18,038.37
Balance: $0.00
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
BP 00100003111100 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 10.123.80
PF 00100003112300 PLAN CHECK FEES 6,580.47
RF 11100003112700 RECREATION FEES 1.331.10
WC 00100003112800 WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.00
I
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF INCOMPLETE OR UNSI
Project #: n — ot7o
Building Fllermit #:
970 -479 -2149 (Inspection
a
TOWN OFYAIL TOWN OF VAIL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION7 _03 -
Separate Permits are required for electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc.!
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
CONTRACT INFORMATION
General Contractor: Town of Vail Reg. No.: Contact and Phone #'s:
7 -'YA:
Email address: Ile,
Contractor Signature:
rnMPI FTF VAI I1ATIONS Fn RHILD PERMIT (Labor & Materials)
BUILDING: $ELECTRICAL: $OTHER: $ /qI7
PLUMBING: $ ; iG'MECHANICAL: $TOTAL: $
J_)
c,,. o,,-^i 41 Fnn/n ('nnnfv dccACCnrc Office at 970 -328 -8640 or visit www.eacile- cout7ty.com
Parcel # jjoLV
Job Address;
Legal Descriptio Block Filing:Subdivision: z/f _,_
Owners Name: Address: `jam EE,7n Phone:e_ ln
Arr,hitect/Designer:YX
Address: dti C/"U Phone:
Engineer Address:,Phone:y
Detailed description of work:
Work Class: New Y) Addition ( ) Remodel( ) Repair( ) Demo ( ) Other ( )
Work Type: Interior ( ) Exterior( ) Both Does an EHU exist at this location: Yes No( )
Type of Bldg.: Single family PC) Two - family ( ) Multi family ( ) Commercial ( ) Restaurant ( ) Other ( )
No. of Existing Dwelling Units in this building: 7 No=Accommodation Units in this building: 1>
No /T e of Fire laces Existing: Gas Appliances Gas Los Wood /Pellet Wood Burning
No /T pe of Fire laces Proposed: Gas Appliances Gas Los _-' Wood /Pellet Wood Burning (NOT ALLOWED
Does a Fire Alarm Exist: Yes ( ) No( " Does a Fire Sprinkler System Exist: Yes ( ) No ( )
FOR OFFICE USE
Other Fees: Type of Construction: Accepted By:
DRB Fees: occupancy Group: Planner Sign -off:
Public Way Permit Fee: Date Received:
Vail\ data \cdev \FORMS \PERMITS \BLDGPER M.DOC 07/26/2002
I
Questions? Call the Building Team at 479 -2325
Building Permit Submittal ChecklistT0IiAlOFVAIL
Department of Community Development
Project Name: ;91 /1/,>7 / — Fllz 6cl- e-_ _
Project Address: / 7Q / PGI, efKil 1,. ) ells
This Checklist must be comvleted before a Building Permit application is
accepted,
18 "" All pages of application is complete
A" Has DRB approval obtained (if required) Provide a copy of approval form
Condominium Association letter of approval attached if project is a Multi - Family complex
g' Complete site plan submitted
Public Way Permit application included if applicable (refer to Public Works checklist)
12 Staging plan included (refer to Public Works checklist) No dumpster,parking or material storage
allowed on roadways and shoulders without written approval
Asbestos test and results submitted if demolition is occurring
a" Architect stamp and signature (All Commercial and Multi family)
a" "Full floor plans including building sections and elevations(5 sets of plans for Multi - Family and
Commercial Buildings)
Et' I'll Window and door schedule
Full structural plans, including design criteria (i.e.loads)
ta'"" Engineer stamp and signature on structural plans (All Commercial and Multi Family)
Report must be submitted prior to footing inspection
Er" resistive assemblies specified and penetrations indicated
Smoke detectors shown on plans
I-
Types and quantity of fireplaces shown
Applicant's Signature:
Date of submittal: 7
Received By:
ail\ data \cdev\FORMS \PERMITS \BLDGPER M.DOC 04102/2003
fL J
My i !
E
BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME
If this permit requires a Town of Vail Fire Department Approval, Engineer's (Public Works)
review and approval, a Planning Department review or Health Department review, and a review
by the Building Department, the estimated time for a total review will take as long as three (3)
weeks.
All commercial (large or small) and all multi - family permits will have to follow the above
mentioned maximum requirements. Residential and small projects should take a lesser amount
of time. However, if residential or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
departments with regard to necessary review, these projects may also take three (3) weeks to
review and approve.
Every attempt will be made by this department to expedite this permit as soon as possible.
I, the undersigned, understand the plan check procedure and time frame. I also understand
that if the permit is not picked up by the expiration date, that I must still pay the plan check fee
and that if I fail to do so it may affect future permits that I apply for.
Agreed to by: q We,/
Print name,,a_
Signature ( Q
Project Name:
Date: d 103
F: everyone /forms /bldperm3