The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAIL LIONSHEAD FILING 3 LOT 3 ANTLERS ELEVATOR(;onshe"d \rnq i ro-d- t cl>t 3 Anftcrs 6t€irq.lof CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PLUMBING FOUNDATION NOTE _ COPY OF PERMIT TO BE KEPT ON JOBSITE DATE lxll]Ufixxx{I'l'{txxfx 4lLr/94 6674 department of community development TO BE FILLEO OUT COMPLETELY PRIOF TO ISSUANCEOF PERMIT WPE OF PERMIT n!n!EUILDING ETECTRICALfl MEcHANrcabo ffi r8frEfiafiBRpr.rcs LEGAL lesc. LOT BLK- FILING ATTLLERS--CoNDoMrNI.E4 JOBNAME: ANTLERS ELEVATOR - REPAIRS OWNER Hrue ANTLERS CONDO ASIOC uo,.ooo*ro680 w LToNSHEAD PL crrY vArL, co PH. 476-247 ARCHITECT FIRM MAIL ADDRESS crw PH. GENERAL CONTRACTOR FIRM CASSON BUILDING CORP rowN oF vArL REG. No. 150-A 782-9216 lr..r*,.0,-FIRM TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO.U{JNIKALIUK PLUMBING FIRM TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO. UUN I KAU IUK MECHANICAI CONTRACTOR FIRM TOWN OF VAIL REG, NO OTHER CONTRACTOR FIRM MILLAR ELEVATOR TOWN OF VA|L REG. NO. 355_s rELE. 623-2646 r. wPE OF CONSTRUCTTON | [ nr l V V 2. OCCUPANCY GROUP ABE H IR M DIVISION 122a34 GENERAL OESCRIPTION OFWORK i - AT.TERATTONq A, PEPATPS TN T'YTqTTN/: PERMIT. NO. z F- BUILDING ELECTRICAL PLUMBING ELEVATOR PER PLANS AND SPECS.II'ECHANICAL ELEVATOF $94,000 TYPE GROUP G.R.F.A. VALUATION PERMIT FEES II FR R-l EUILOING PERMIT r09.00 s)€\ V1 .a (F.\ $s =b> PLAN CHECK ELECTRICAL NEW ATTERATION () ADDITIONAL REPAIR(XX PLUMEING DWELLING UNITS - ACCOMMOOATION UNITS - HEIGHT IN FT. - NO.FIREPLACES MECHANICAL RECREATION FEE R.VALLUE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CLEAN.UP OEPOSIT USE TAX ROOF WILL CALL 3.00 I TYPE OF HEAT SOLAR GAS wooo TOTAL PERMIT FEES 112.00 DAN STANEK 4/22/94 ADOITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED: Y N INITIAL sr cur | | | J.LD;NG OFT;CIAL - - DATE )NING ADMINISTRATOR DATE BLASTING fNING & BUILDING NOTES: BILL HI'LSE SIGNED OFF 4I2I/94 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, tilled out in full the information required, completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zonirlg and sqpdivision codes, design review approved, Uniform Building Code and other ordin applicable thereto. SIGNATUFE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOB HIMSELF AND THE OWNER. TOWN OF VATL CONSTRUCTTON PERMIT APPLTCATTON TORMDNrEr AP/iL /, /??+ 4 ,.1 r- PERMTT # QbTq , APPLICATTON MUST BE FTLLED OUT COMPLETELy OR IT MAy NOT BE ACCEPTED I** ****************** * ** ******* PERMIT INFORI,IATfON ********** ** ***** ********* * **rl I J-Building [ ]-Plunbing [ ]-Electrical [ ]-Mechanical tXl-other €rEnra,e Job Narne: An.aes%ffEf ,rob Addre s,,t 6g0 //. dlai*taa /zace Legar Description: r,ot 5 Block_.11 piLLns l'ry,#iiratrF &aaohtners Name : @Address : @p|^.1 Z6-Ji4 Architect z Zntt /lAueZasr Address : /Et__fupz SZ- /etue-Prr.W! General Description: r{ork cr.ass : [ ] -New,fr!;'€{"ffi'd({l -Additional ,€ [ ]-Repair [ ]-other Number of Dwelling Units: At/b PLWBTNG: $ Address: 4, Electrical Contractor : Address: Number of Accommodatl-on Units z 4e Town of VaiI Req. NO. Phone Number:(3a3l6tJ Contractor: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: PLT'MBING PERMTT FEE: MECHANTCAI.I PERMIT FEE: EI.ECTRTCAL FEE: TOTAL: INFORMATTON * **************** * ** * **** * * Town of Vail Req.. NO. Phone Number- Town of VaiI Phone Number: Town of Vail Phone Number: Reg. NO. Reg. NO.Plumbing Address: Contractor: ******************************** FOR oFFrcE usE ******************************* BUILDTNG PI.AN CHECK FEE: PLWBING PI,AN CHECK FEE: MECHANICAL PI,AN CHECK FEE: RECREATION FEE: CI,EAN-UP DEPOSIT:OTHER TYPE OF fSftr,.k4(lF DRB FEE: BUILDING! SIGNATURE: ZONING: STGNATI]RE: .Etarac.fea A. t l2. oo ^ I|mber and Type of Fireplaces: eas Appliances rU/Acas T,ogs n//A wood/pelle\gA_v^l********* * ************* * * * * ****** VALUATTONS ***** ** ************* * *** * * * *** ***'l (Fta'eu)' A- '-'z'Eur-r"n, ELECTRTGAL: $ g#N GLEAI{ I'P DEPOSIT REFIII{D T1O: Cornnents: lnwn 75 soulh frontage road Yail, colorado 81657 (3o3) 479-2L38 or 479-2L39 olflce ol communlty deyelopmeltl BUILDING PERI.IIT ISSUANCE TIME FRAME II-!!i: fryit,lequirres a Town of Vail fire Deparrnent Approval, :l9lT.i-r,,tly?li: l.lgrfs) review and approvat, a ptann.ins' oepartment f:]:y_?:.Hea,lth Department review, and a_review by the 6uitiingueparrment' the estimated time for a tstal review iray take as 16ngas three weelts. f]] cgmmgrgial (l6rgs or smar'r) and ail murti-familv permits wiilhave to follow the above mentioned maximum requiremlnti. Residential il9.:T9ll projects.should take a lesser amount of time. However, itresl.oentlar or slnaller projects impact the various above mentioned !i!l"lT:!q,.with regard. to necessary review, tfrese pioie.ir"ruyatso take the three week period. Every attempt wrlll be made by this department to expedite thispermi't as. sgon as possible. - I' the undersign€d, understand the plan check procedure and timeframe. Communi ty Devel opment Department. o 'rVfUte'rProject Name 75 soulh fronlage road Yail, colorado 81657 (303) {79-2138 or 479-2L39 oftlce of communlty developmenl TO:ALL COIflTRACTORS CI'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH TI{ETOWN OF VATL rRoMs ToI''rN or vArL puBlrc woRKs/coMMUNrry DEVETOPMENT DATE: su&fEcT: and rn sunmary,.ordinance No. 6 states that it is unr-awfuJ. for anyperson to litt.er, track or deposit any soil , r""f, sand, debriso:r rnaterial , including trash ilumpster!, portable toilets andworkmen vehicres. upon any streetl siaewaiil -;ir;y or publicp1?:" or any porrion theieof. The right_"i_;;t-;n all Town ofVaiI streets and.Igag= is approxinately 5 ft. off pavernent.Thl:.ordinance will be strillfy enforcia by the Town of vailPubric works Denartment. pers6ns found. viilatinq this ordinanceyir]. be siven a 24 hour written ;"ii;;1;-;;;;;""aid narerial.rn the event the person so notified does not compry wittr-ah;---notice within rhe 24 hour time-"p""iii"e,-;;";;f,iic worx"Departrnent will remove said nateii"r it it"-""p""=e of personnotified. The provisions of this ord.inance sfi'ari not beapplicable to c6nstruction, r.irri"ttunce or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utilities in the ,igti_u_*.y. To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the Town ofYlll B"ilding Department to obtain a copy. tfranX you for yourcooperation on this natter. }'ARCH 15, 1988 CONSTRUCTTON PARKING & MATERTAL STORAGE Rea Y acknowledged (i.e. contractor, owner) Jl-f.t-aE-1994 18116 FR0r4 CASSON ELDG CoRP T0 73634?9?452 P.A? G0LoRALSTATEVSIDE IRON wORKERS (ryT0R) JOITTT A]FFRENTICESHIP & TRAINING COMF'ITTEE OF VfELDER PERFOR/YiANCI FILLET WELDS WETDING CERTIFICATE RECOMMINuEIT FORM q-tg rvrnruurngruRER's REcoRD QUAUFTGATTON TESTS ON GROOVE OR WELD|NG pxgqrss MAN,UAL SHTELDED A.*C - posliloN llf verticat 5r6tc whether upward o, 4o-n*uodl 3 c uP 4G XXXXXXX*'X (FlEt, horirontal, vertictl. or overhcgdt Fig. D'21, D'2) In oscordance with PRoCEDURE SPECIFICATION Mrierhl specif icstion---llJ-9J- Piam+ftr and Wrll Thlckness {if pipel otherwl$e Jolnt A-3 6 to p- No*--i-- to P. l'lo--L--- 1/8" THROUGil 3/4"Thickncrt PanEe lhic qrlaiifi rlllEl ,liEfAL Sp*ci flcation No'At\'$ A5.5 Group tle, Delcribe Flller Mltd When Rrquiredf '. -- -"' --ff ls Sadking Sfrip urcd? K'N INFORMATION ONLY i/8" E-701 .-filler Mctrt Diametet rnd Trade . ., iux for Suhnerrgcd Arc or Gas Tert Conduc{ed bY t f?t - for lnert Ges $hielded Are Weldi CUIDED BEND 'ESI RISULT' l,IILLIA}1 C. MELCHIOR taborlfory Tcst 2131-93 o4l o7 193 $i9nl,l We c*rdfy ?hat the stalementE ln this record ere corrcct lnd accordtnce with the requirerncnts of fimerlcan Wulding $vciely coLopA no sTATEwl DE I RONWORI$ERS -[ER-E{O-BSIid-r'ii aiFnertriCettttp a TRAI N ING coM,ulrtEE ,. 3385 Walnuf, Darv+r, Colorada E0105 'q-"rhonc 303-29 6'6626 that the TESf Code. 1993A"D.,- FIGUTE flg.sGsull:i nrFr ^lrDflcunE Ho.tEgut Ts 1c lc ROOT TA f: Tt 3G ROOT PAss EP PASS ED3G trACE 2a Rflrlr PACE 4G Root ?ASSED 6C FACE PASSE! vltc Acccplablc - -'"" - , - vE.cGrdls,sued-'^'- '-- " . -WELDS ware prepqred, weldrd and te*ied in Before me thic Apr iI 9fit Donnie M.0'Brien . r,.rfi;iigt TNTA P. 'I2 rNs{#croN REouEsr TOWN OF VAIL 479-2138 '/ z il- Joa runur /y't /-&'t''l 1/' ,t-,tt,,tt'< INSPECTION:MON CALLER TUES THUR PERM DATE NUMBER OF PROJEC PMFRIREADY FOR LOCATION:44/ !).t':; BUILDING:PLUMBING: T] FOOTINGS / STEEL tr UNDERGROUND tr ROUGH / D,W.V. tr ROUGH/WATER tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr FRAMING ,- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWooD NAILING tr GAS PIPING tr INSULATION tr SHEETROCK tr POOL / H. TUB NAIL tr trtr drrNel FINAL ELECTRICAL: tr TEMP. POWER MEGHANICAL: tr HEATING T] ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR E tr tr FINAL N FINAL {/6PPRovED tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: .,..,_ ,"/../?- f5- DATE lNSPEcroR 'l,ii,' ' ,4:t', ., ' - Lionshead Redevelopment GRFA and Slle Cov€rag€ Worksheet Rsvlsed 1/23197 Bullding Name (a.k.a.)Zonlng Lot Slze (sq. ft.) GRFA Allowed (sq. fr,) GRFA Exlsting On.Slte (sq. ft.) Dltference (sq. fi.) srte uovorags Allowed (sq. ft.) sllo coverage Allowed % of Lol slls 9ovetage Exlsling On-Slto (sq. tt.) slte coverage Exlstlng On-Slte o/. of Lot Dlfference (sq. ft.) cc2 52,390 41.912 49,914 (8,002 36,673 70%unKnown #VALUE!#VALUE!Concert Hall Plaza cc2 1 1,283 9,026 9,026 7,898 70%unKnown #VALIJEf #VALUEIEnzlan (Condos)ccz 12.866 10,293 16 450 6,1 s7)€;006 6,10 47%2,904ndola Buildlng ccz 59,410 47,848 47,848 41,867 70%unknown #VALUEI #VALUEIrFl€llo{lJrztan Lodge cc2 40,367 32,294 't8,61 1 13,683 28,2s7 70%6,752 21,505cc265,122 s2,098 58,334 ,236)45,585 70%unknown #VALUEI #VALUEIgeccz20,334 I o.zo /17,640 1,373)14,234 70%15,497 760/"(1,263nscc270%36,166 #Dtv/01 36,166s Square Loctge (Phases 1,2 & 3)78,416 62,733 7s,660 (1 0.927 54,891 70%41,650 53./""t3.241 s Square North (Phase 4 cc2 41,s13 33,210 29,50s o,/uc 29.059 70%unknown #VALUEI #VALUEILlonshoad Arcade 14,074 8,0s9 .|4,160 6,101)7,O52 70%unknown #VALUEI #VALUEICenlerccz40,206 32,165 29,468 2.697 28,144 70%25,156 63/.2,988ge at Llonshead, Phase 1&2 HDMF 59,629 ., F, -t't't 57,841 (22,O84 32,796 RqotL unknown #VALUE!#VALUE! at Llonshead. Phase 3 HDMF (29%) & MDMF (71%)42.785 18,O77 20,043 (1,967)20,109 47%unknown #VALUE!#VALUE!Marno The Mark SDD #7 225,205 134,000 134,000 123,863 55/"unknown #VALUE #VALUEIMontaneroscc244,848 3s.s78 44,298 8,420 31,394 70%unKnown #VALUE #VALUEI nDrru Lod9e ac2 26.527 21,222 17,741 3,481 18,569 70%unknown #VALUE #VALUEI T cc2 38,690 30,952 36,794 5,842)27,083 70%21,970 57%5,113Vall 21 cc2 15,532 12.426 18,893 (6,467 10.972 70%unknown #VALUE!#VALUEI HDMF 78,408 47,045 59,396 (12,351 43,124 JJ"/o unknown #VALUEI #VALUEI l spa lglo Lodge HDMF 152,460 91,476 8s.501 q o7R 83.853 55%unknown #VALUEI #VALUEIcc227,977 22,382 10,798 11 ,584 19,584 4,71s 14,869anlage Polnt ccz 68.s20 54,816 69,167 (14,3s1)47.964 70%unKnown #VALUEI #VALUEIcc236,S88 29,590 36,253 (6,663 25,892 70%unknown #VALUE!#VALUE! - Notes: Exlsting GRFA ligures ar€ based on llle documenlallon or bullding plans. These figures do not Include common area whlch mighl count as GRFA. Lot slz€ laken from suweys, condo plats, or file documenlalion Concert Hall Plaza, the Gondola Building, and Llon's Pride do nol have GRFA constructed on-sit€. More accurate calculatlons may need to be made based on as-bullt plans on a project by ptoJect basls, GRFALION.XLS #igr* netiew Action flt TOWN OF VAIL category numuer{ Project Name: Building Name: Project Description: Owner. Address and Phone: + tl'lb - efl n"r,it"o@podressand eno,ne: tol LeutrtL -ye 4-rn Legal Description: Lot ?I subdivision Proiect Street Addnass:L Comments: fu""/zone Districr eE Board / Staff Action Motion by:_voet t'0 Seconded by: {noc,ou^t 1 ! Disapproval ! Staff Approval Conditions: NTL€R T \NIL February 17, 1994 Randy Stouder Town of Vail Community DevelopmCnt 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 8165? Dear Thanks for your h in working through the approval process for our elevator the DRB meeting yesterday, I'd like to clarify ourproject. Persuant to responsibilities landscaping . We will expand the p ter in front of the office area. It is currently by five feet wide, It will be enlarged to forty-ninetwenty-seven feet feet long, with the width as before. This represents about an 80% as before (honeysuc , azalea, columbine and dwarf alberta spruce) with the addition of at least aspen trees. Each of the aspens will be a minimum of eight feet tsll with a two inch caliper. increase in size. As "open space" between If the aspen do not planter, we will rep understand that the before, it will be fully planted, with little or no shrubs. We will generalty use the same plant material ve after a few years because of the size of the them with the tallest viable option we can find. We tent of the DRB was to have something tall which will mitigate the "ve " of the building. We agree with that intent. AEain, thanks for yo Sincerely, help and I'11 talk to you soon. Robert LeVine 680 West Lionshead If,tc'sFr8 t s,nq ,r;Tir (303) 476-4146Vail, Colorado 81657 (3O3) 476-2471 i # -H H$ iqE. IE f;EF ff E$ EYc!I F I N\t\_\l(r\r ab c 4 o { { {{h I r-ttt !u\o? Fdr:t? ?rl J sa$rli4't a 4 B !I,.b \ \f 0 / E 1.,J qDTbqtbEae Enita Eqtrf.tazrh-'lI?/\ tv s83-11NVIB 3$ryd \g*t (\- T o I. Nqw Consqruction ($200.00) Minor Alteration ($20. - rhddLLion 11559.99-1 Conceprual Review ($0) NAME OFMailing Cond DRBthe t,l applyi accurawilL a ensure $$ 10r0 . $ 5oro $150r 0 $500,0$.Ove * DESIGN REVIEW S.PPROVIII.. I'NI.ES STARTED. **NO APPIJICAIION APP],ICANT' S Address: H. /\/ REpREsBNTATTvE , l(-B La U,t,{-t+*,.f E'u Lt l/-" Phone T NAME OF OWNERS: *sr (s) :MaiIin Address: Phone lum Approval if applicable. ; DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid ate of submit.tal of DRB applicat,ion. Later, wheng for a building permit., please identify t,hee valuation of the proposal . The Town of Vail J. K. just the fee according to the tabLe below, to . / ,/_ tthe correct, fee is paid. annoL (/241q'l teB PATD: S_zL{_/ . tu , ,-^!, WtffiznvbVALUATIONVALUATION FEE0-$ 10,000 $20.001-$ 50,000 $50.001 - $ 150,000 $100.001-- $ 500,000 $200.00I - $1,000,000 $400.00$1,000,000 $500.00 APPROVAIL EXPIRES ONE YEAR AT'TER FINAII ISSUED Ar:{D CONSTRUCTION ISA BUILDTNG PERMTT TS WII.I] BE PROCESSED WITEOUT OWNER'S SIGNATURE Orevisea gl4lsL DRB AP LICJITION - TOWN'OF V]III,COLORADO APPLICATION RECEIVED: DA,TE OF DRB MEETING: ********** rgls APPIICATION I{ILL NOT BE ACCEPTEDIS SSBMITTEDI'NEIT.I REQUIRED INI'ORMATION' ********** A.DESCRIPT oN: Lervpoty eF €/tfrtpw {LilrtToft_ -n LJ rJ c-rJ nt{ tr^t k.4r' C^r c-sttR{ Futpfoss r-r> e-oafc/ l-t r B. TYPE OF Ngw Constiniction ($200 .00)or Alteration ($20.00) ftaaition ($s0. oo) r . ooo*ss, 68o Ls. L, "^s/*.4a P-. D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T,ot 3 Block subdivisji on L to-,JHan ? R4 f t crp G-_, If propQrt,y is described by a meets and bounds lega1desgrip$ion, please provide on a separate sheet andattach qo this application. AaE. ZONING: Lq- , f F. LOT ARE$,: If required, appl.icant, must provide a currentstampedlsurvey showing loL area G. NAME OFIAPPLICANT: 7,-rtZ cW s A^t x,^ tdr./4s Mailing i AddSess :be hJ. t_ 1,.-,, !Z PRE-APPLICATTON MEETING :II. A pre-applicat.ion meeting wj.th a member of the planning staff is strongly encouraged to deterrnine if any addit.ional- application information is needed. It is the applicant'sresponsibility to make an appoint.nent. with the staff to determine if there are additional submittal requirenents. Please note that a COMPLETE application will streamline theapproval process for your project. III. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDINF ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A. fn addition to meeting submit.tal requirements, theapplicant, must st.ake and tape the project site toindicate property 1ines, building lines and buildingcorners. All trees to be removed must be taped. All site Lapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. B. The revierd process for NEW BUILDINGS normally reguires two separate meetings of the Design Review Board: a conceplua1 approval and a final approval . applicants should plan on presenting their development proposal ata minimurn of two meet.ings before obtaining final approval . C. Applicant,s who fail to appear before the Design Review Board on their scheduled meeting date and who have not. asked in advance that discussion on their item bepostponed, will have their items removed from the DRB docket, unt.il such time as the item has beenrepubli shed. D. The following items may, at the discretion of thezoning adrninistrator, be approved by the Community Developrnent Depattment staff (i.e. a formal hearingbefore the DRB may not be required): a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changeswhich do not alter the existing plane of thebuilding; and b. Building addit.ion proposals not visible from anyother lot or public space. At the time such aproposal is submit.ted, applicanLs must includefetters from adjacent property owners and,/or fromthe agent for or manager of any adjacent condominj.um association stating the association approves of the addition. E, If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow,wetland, etc) , a hazard study rnust be submitted and t.he owner rnust sign an affidavit recognizing the hazardreport prior. to the issuance of a building permit. epplicant.s are encouraged to check with a Town Plannerprior to DRB application t.o determine the relationshipof the property to all mapped hazards. F. Eor alL residentlal construction: ar Clearly indicate on the floor plans the insideface of the ext.erior struct.ural walls of thebuilding; andb. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a, four foot distance fron the exterior face of thebuilding wa1ls or supporting colurnns. G. If DRB approves t,he application with conditions ormodifications, all conditions of approval must beresolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit. IV. NElt CONST*U.rrt A. Three copies of a recent topoqraphic survey, stamped bya licgnFed survevor, at a scale of l-,' = 20t or tafger,on which the following information is provided: 1. Lot area. 2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcelconsists of 6 acres or mgre, in which caser 5,contour int.ervals nay be accepted. 3. Existing t.rees or groups of trees having t.runkswith diameters of 4,, or more, as measured from apoint one foot above grade. 4. Rock outcroppings and other significant nat.uralfeatures (1arge boulders, intermit.tenl streams,etc. ) . Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.)rcenterline of stream or creek, required creek orstream setback, L00-year flood plain and slopes of40t or more, if applicable. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landrnarkor sewer invert,. This information should beclearly stated on the survey so t.hat all me4surements are based on the same starting point.This is particularly important for height measurements. See Policy On Survey Information,for more information regarding surveys. Locations of the following:a. i Size and type of drainage culvert.s, swales,etc. must be shown. b. Exact location of exj-sting utility sources and proposed service lines from their sourceto the structure. Ut.ilities to incl-ude: 5. Cable TV Telephone Show all utility meter locations, including any pedestals to be ]ocated on site or in theright-of-way adjacent to the site. Revocablepermits from the Town of Vail are requiredfor improvements in the right-of-way. d. Propert.y lines - distances and bearings and abasis of bearing must be shown. e. AII easements (Tit.1e report must also includeexist.ing easement locations) Existing and finished grades. Provide spot elevations of the st.reet, and a minimum of one spot elevat.ion on either side ofthe Iot, 25 feet. out from the side properLy lines. of the followinq: Proposed surface drainage on and off site. slope and spotb. Proposed driveways. Percent elevations must be shown. 2. AII existing improvements including structures, J-andscaped areas, service areas, storage areas,waIks, drivewaysr off-st.reet parking, loading areas, retaining walls (with top and bottom ofwalI spot elevations), and other existing site improvements. 3 Sewer Gas Water Electric Site PIan 1. Locations B. ? a and proposed qrades shown underneath). Theseelevations and grades must. be provided in orderfor the staff to determine building height. AIIridge lines should be indicated on the site plan.Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicatedon the site plan with corresponding finished andav i a'|. i nr' rr-1619 eLeVatiOnS . 4. Driveway grades may not exceed 8t unless approvedby the Town Engineer. Landscape Plan lLtt = lQt or larger) - 3 copies required L. The following information must be provided on Lhelandscape pIan. The l"ocation of existing 4"dianeter or larger trees, the location, size,spacing and type (common and latin name) of aLlexisting and proposed pLant material. ALl treesto be saved and to be removed musL also beindicated. The plan must also differentiate between existing and proposed veget.ation. 2. Complete the attached landscape naterials list. 3. The location and type of existing and proposedwatering systems to be employed in caring forplant, rnat.eriaL following its installat.ion. 4. Existing and proposed cont.our lines. In order to clarify the inLer-relation of the variousdevelopment proposal components, please incorporate asnuch of the above inforrnat,ion as possibLe onto the siteplan. Iocation of utiLit.v service attached) . and availability (see A prgliminarv title report must accompany allsubmit.tals, to insure property ownership and locationof alI easements on properly. Architectural Plans (L/8,' = 1. or larger, 1/4,, ispreferred scaLe for review) 3 copies required. 1. Scaled floor plans and aII elevations of theproposed development.. Elevat.ions must show both , exist.ing and finished grades. 2. One set. of f]oor plans must be ttred-lined" to showhow t,he gross residential floor area (GRFA) wascalculated. NOTE: n E. J.Reductions of all elevations and the site plan (g-1/2" x 11") for inclusion in pEC and/or fo-r^rnCouncil memos may be requested. 4. Exterior surfacing materials and material colorsshall be specified on the attached materials List.This rnaterials list must be completed andsubmitted as a part of DRB application. Colorchlps, siding samples etc., should be presented tothe Design Review Board meeting ?ong checlt 1ist. (attached) must be completed if project.is located within the Single-Family, tiimary/Secbndiryor Duplex zone district.s. Photos of the existing site and where applicable, ofadjacent structures. G. H. rrr" zolipAdministraror and,/or DRBt, .*nuire rhesubmission of additional plans, d.rawings,specifications, samples and other mateiials (includ.inga model) if deemed necessary to determine whether apro jecL will comply wj.th Design Guid.elines. v. VI Photos or sketches which cJ.early convey the redevelopment.proposal and the location (site plan) of the redevel-opmentproposal may be subrnitted in lieu of the more formalrequirements set forth above, provided all importantspecifications for the proposal including colbrs andmaterials to be used are submitted. A. Original floor plans with alI specifications slrown. B. Three sets of proposed floor plans 1/B't.- lt or 1arger(I/4" - It is preferred) C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing andproposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneat,h. Elevations of proposed addition. Photos of the existing strucLure. F. Specifications for all materials and color samples onmat.erials list (attached) . At the request of t.he Zoning Administrator you may also berequired to submic: G. A st,atement from each utility verifying location ofservice and availability. See attached utilirylocation verification forn. H. A site improvement survey, stamped by regist.eredprofessional surveyor. A prelirninary title report, to verify ownership of Once a building permiL has been issued, and. construction isunderway, and before the Building Department will schedule afraning inspection, two copies of an Improvement LocationCert.ificate survey (1LC) stamped by a registeredprofessional engineer must be submitted. The followinqj.nformation must be provided on the ILC: D. VII A.Building location (s) with ties to property corners,i.e. distances and angles. B. n G. H. BuiJ-ding AIl util materlal Drainage dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot. ity service Line as-builts, showing type ofused, and size and exact location of lines as-builts. Basis of bearj.ng to tie to section corner. AII propert,y pins are to be either found or set andst^ated on improvement. survey. AIl easements. Building fLoor eLevat.ions and al-l roof ridge elevat.ions and proposed grades shown under t.he ridgewit.h existlnolines Submittal requirernenLs: The owner or authorized agentof any projecL requiring design approval as prescribedby this chapter may submit plans for conceptual revj-ewby the Design Review Board to the Department of Community Development. The conceptual review isintended to give the applicanL a basic underst.anding ofthe compatibifity of their proposal with the Town, sDesign Guidelines. This procedure is recommendedprimarily for applications more complex than single-family and t.wo-family residences. However, developersof single-family and two-family project.s shall not beexcluded from the opportunity t.o request a conceptualdesign review. Complete applications must. be submitted10 days prior to a scheduLed DRB meeting. The foltowing information shall be submitted for aconceptual review: 1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimunscale of one inch equals twenty feet; 2. Concept,ual elevations showing ext.erior materials and a description of the character of the proposed sLructure or structures,- 3. Sufficient. information to show t.he proposal complies with the development, standards of thezone district. in which t,he project is to beLocated (i.e. GRFA, site coverage cal_culations, number of parkingl spaces, etc.); 4. Completed oRe application form. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for concept.ual design review, the Department of ComrnunityDevelopment shall review the subrnitted mat.erials forgeneral compliance with the appropriate requirements ofthe zoning code. If the proposal is in basiccompliance with the zoning code requirements, theproject shall be forwarded to the DRB for conceptualreview. If the application is not generalJ.y in compJ.iance with zoning code requirement.s, theapplication and submittal mat.erials shall be returnedto the applicant with a written explanation as to whythe Communit.y Developnent. Department staff has foundthe project not to be in compliance with zoning coderequirements. Once a cornplete application has-beenreceived, t.he DRB shal] review t.he submitted conceptualreview application and supporting material in order todetermine whether or not. the project generally complieswith the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote onconcepLual reviews. The property owner or hisrepresentative shall be present at the DRB hearing. B. o 1-LtrZ t t a\ttt 1Pw L ____-BLOCK I SUBDIVISION LtocJt*4\ 3 n4 €rc,,.(.-- 3o . Lt o)9 \ PL. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:€a+.V.?lroL R€ttotaZ-- NA},IE OF PROJECT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STREET ]TDDRESS: The following information is Review Board before a final A. BUILDING MATERTALS: Roof Siding Other WaII Mgterials Fascia Sof f it.s Windows Window Trin Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Flues Flashings Chimneys Rails Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Ot.her B. LANDSCAPING: Name of required for submittal to the Designapproval can be given: TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR Designer: Dhnna. BLttl LE- Gt 4lS fe ,*',rtrcl exrtn,-6-- fr-unrtr-t /e".ur]<nt,!4 7] ,MT't-t/ @-w PLANT MATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED *Indicate caliper for decidrjous trees. Minimurn caliper for deciduous trebs is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferous Botanical Name trees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet. PLANT MATERIAT' PROPOSED SHRUBS Botanical Name "o*ron t.Ouantitv Size* EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED *fndicate size5 qallon- GROUND COVERS soD SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION rYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL of proposed shrubs. TVpe Minimum size of shrubs is Sguare Footaqe c. LANDSCAPE LTGHTTNG: rf exterior lighting is proposed, preaseshow the number of fixtures and tocations on a separauelighting.pral . rdentify each fixture from the }i'gnting ptanon the list below and provide the wattage, height'abov5 ' grade and type of light proposed. orHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa1rs, fences, swimmingpoo1s, etc.) Please. specify. Indicate heights of'retaininfwaLls. Maximum height of walls wit^hin t.he front setback ii3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the propertyis 6 feet.. D. SUBDIVISION JOB NAME BLOCK FILING ADDRESS The rocation and availability of utirit.ies, whether they be maint5un\ llr"g or proposed lines, must be approved and verified bythe following utilities for the accornpanying site plan. Authorized Siqnature Date U.S. West Communications t-800*922-L 9 B7 468-5860 or 949-4530 Public Service Company 949-s781 Gary Ha}1 Holy Cross Elect.ric Assoc. 949-5892 Ted Husky,/Michael Laverty Heritage Cabl.evision T.v. 94 9-5530 Steve Hiatt Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District * 47 6-7 480 Pred Has1ee \lN 'TlF . * Please bringobtaining Upperflow needs must This form is to verify service avaitability andlocation. This should be used in conjunction withpreparing.your utility plan and schedulinginstallations. For any new construction proposal, the applicantmust provide a completed utility verificat.ionform. If a utilit.y company has concerns with theproposed construction, the utility represent.ativeshould not directLy on Lhe ut.ility veiiticationform that there is a problem which needs to beresol-ved- The j-ssue strould then be spelled out indet,ail in an attached let.ter to t,he Town of VaiI.Hewever, please keep in mind that it is theresponsibility of the utillty cornpany to resolveidentified problems. If the ut,ilit.y verification form has signaturesfrom each of the utility companies, and noconments are made directly on the form, the Townwill presurne t.hat there are no problems and thatthe development can proceed. These verifications do not relieve the contract.orof his responsibility t.o obtain- a street cutpermit from the Town of Vai1, Department. of public rygtkg and to obtaj.n utilitv locations beforedlssinq in any public right-of-way or easement inthe Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not ast.reet cut permit. A street cut permiL must beobt,ained separately. a site. plan, floor p1an, and elevations whenEagle Valley wat.er & Sanit.ation signatures. Firebe addressed. 3. 5. I DI t(, ZONE CHECK FORR, R P,/S ZONE DISTRICTS DATE: TEGAL DESCRTPTION:Lot _ BLock Filing ADDRESS: OWNER ARCHITECT PHONE PHONE ZONE DISTRICT PROPOSED USE *XLOT SIZE Allowed (30) (33) Existinq Proposed Total Height. ToTaI GRFA Primary GRFA Secondary GRFA Setbacks +425= +425= Front Sides Rear 20, 15, 15, (301 1591vilafer Course Setback Site Coverage Landscaping Retaining Wall Heights Parking Garage Credit Drive: View Corridor Encroachment: yes EnvironmentaL,/Hazards: L) zt ?\.)t ?t /At Reqrd (300) (600) (900) (1200)_ Permit.ted Slope -Ql_ Actuat Slope Date approved by Town Engineer: No 22',) Flood Plain Percent Slope Geologic Hazardsa) Snow Avalancheb) RockfaLlc) Debris Flow4) Wetlands Frevlous conditions of approval (check property file) Does thls request involve a 250 Addition?How much of the allowed 250 Addition is useffiEis request? *xNote: under sections l-8.12.090 (B) and 1g.13.080 (B) of the MunicipalCode, lots zoned Two Family and primary,/Second.ary which are 1ess tiranL51000,sq. ft. in area may not const.ruct a second dwelling unit. Thecommunity DeveLopment Departnent may grant an exception t5 tnisrestrict.ion provided the appricant meets the criteria set, forth underSections LB .L2.090 (B) and 1g .13.080 (B) of the Municipat Code inct,ra:.r,gpernanently restricting the unit as a long-term rentlr unit for full-time employees of the Upper Eagle Valley. 10 ,# SA fifth floor; and bet the second and third floor; between the fourth andthe sixth and severrth floor. Other than the very ground floor which be entered on grade at the property's east end, it isiryossible to access any individual condminirmr in the building withoutsteps. Whoever designed this elevator had a r.rniquetakine at least sev idea how to save or a very warped sense of hrnnor (or both). After mre than two the attached plan. of investigation, the Antlers would like to sutmitoriginal desire was to siryly replace the current Date: November 16, 1 Frm: Ant I ers To: Town of VaiI Subject: Elevator In an att@t to well as to simply the Antlers would li height var iance in o The original (and despite the fact tha currently located be elevator in the exis ard direetly access i that the size of the elevator which met surroturded wi th the upper parking deck. This was deemed far rm Association ty Devel opent Depar tment ign ly with the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA], as e the existing facilities for all guests and owners, e to apply for an exterior alteralion as well as a to redesign the existing elevator. stirg) elevator was built rryith three landings. This, the Antlers has eight floors. The landings are ing shaft. It is centrally located, next to the lobbyle frm the upper parking lot. Unfortunately we foundexisting shaft was not large enough to accmodat e anstrict size regui rements of ADA. The shaft is twin T" prestress concrete construetion that forms the Bnlarging the shaft would mean having to cut the "T's". oo expensive and difficult a project to rurdertake. I I as negative iryact on some nuober of individual ternate locations *1, *2 and #3 were not very well Consequent ly, maqv o r locations were considered. and as can be seen frmthe attached sheet dated 5/12/93, three were drawn and preseinted to theAntlers Condomini unof the building, as condminirmr vi ews. received ( surpr i se, in its current locat ership. Each had difficulty of access to some portion rise). However, the idea of replacing the elevator loeetirg. The owners on was highly sutrported at the Septeuber 1993 owners voted to assess themselves to pay for the project, Iocation ( shoun as #4 on the plans) was used.provided the exist T \NIL EMORANDUM 680 West Lionshead Vail, Colorado 8'1657 (3081476-2471 FAX (303) 476-4146 the attached plans show an elevator which will directly access each of the first seven floors (eighth floor access is not required) as well as both parking lots and the conference area, which are located at "half" levels. The only drawback is that while it will accmodate a wheelchair, it does not meet the strict dimensions specified by AD{. On the recormrendat ion of Gary Murain. I <iiseussed tihe matter with Randy Dipner at '\{eeting the Challeng'e", an ADA consultation dervice appointed by the U.S. Justice Department. He interpreted the size requirements to be for new construction and that the remodel of existing f;acilities such as ours only required what was "readilyachievable". Based on qv description of the change, he thought our proposal was ccqrletely approflri ate. Our submitted plans 4eguire new exterior landings to be constructed on floors three through seven. hre to western exposure of the new elevator doors and the resulting weathel irrylications. we feel it is vital to enclose thoselandings. Hence the necessity for an exterior alteration. The heightof the expanded area will not be as high as the current topnost ridgeline of the building. which is 71 feet above grade. However, it will be expanding the area which is 56 feet high, requiring the height variance. Viewing the building frm the north elevation, there is eurrently 125 linealfeet (east to west) of ridgeline which is at the 71 foot height. The elevator shaft which is 58 feet high will be extended by si.x lineal feet (to the west). Each of these heights are teqrered by the fact that nine feet is below the upper park{ng level. While technically above grade, the visual iryact frm the street or from Radisson's swinming: pool is actually nine feet Iess than the 71 and 58 foot measurements. The additional sguare footag:e created by the new landings and walkways will increase the conmon {rea by a total of 693 square feet. The present hal lwa_vs are not enclosed-. nor are the parking lotsl so there is a total of 111000 square feet of existfng corrnon area which eonsists of the following: Meet ing Roms Catering Kitchen @loyee Lunchroom Pool Equipent Tel ephone Equi pnent Stai rwel I s,/Lan<iings Restroms/Saunas 2800 s.f. 250 200 200 150 2200 500 Lobby 550Offices 950Laundry 350Storag'e 2300Maintenance 250 Ski storage 300 The new enclosure is proposed to be bronze plexiglass screen in anodi zedal "rrinuun fenestratiopr. This will match the current finish on the existingstair tower as well bs that between the building and the upper parking deck. Robert LeVine Go*reral Manager ' tr \N o .! 3al 7 J o IF 3 (J I Y" a- e Itl\- U.,.'-:--;-L\ - ---€.- p v a i[,. O* i I:l'- -a)-i\5 I'\3 ioi t- I \ f,! Q q { o c \Jt\. l-i ! Ji isl':--i , o,, f IJ.L 4 1- t-_I., I I € N ? lii i I -.t I I ..- ..ti l' :'l'r! i:i';_ . .,:;,j'r'il:: ||:+--------iin.i . .:'2,#j': .' ' 'i' : 'i ..,,i; i,l i* i d:lr:' t'.'+;.: .. 't l,r. { '; ir: O i i:;,, q ;t,. l li ii. \- lii'i', U-li;-li,r' 'lii i | | ' I'li i '' .li I 1li : ,r';i;'ii;irhil', r : I r'r l'ffi?ffiFliliri Hlih $,lilii *i:liiii fl;liii $tliii fiiilrii \- fi $llil,l -\-- fii:fti:! fr ;illi,i t, Hiliii = E :;lril -! Il,'; N,\- ;: ==rr ii,ii . u- , .lrs !r lr*-t...-.-,: it --, "t'---1i t i,',:.....|'..:* l . l: --..-.h** ! r Il":-.1---:i ,.1-,- | | I -l--,-'17-]l . I. :- -l-1, I li: it: ,. ,,1 l:.'ffi[i ffitfu= ''iil-tt ,,,"i,,1 I'li t ir',fni ,ii t r H{[[ {iti ?''l iit+li {i ffiI I I o.{ r I Lj0 Ztr{jtt' u'fi IJIL irrll v E(n ffi$n$j* :*, il. .''','L,i ,' ',''''l["t'Ir " * y/*T\r - $. l{\ ', .E{ .! , ,,,1 ' ,-r,,i:,i,.;i*''-il+:*i; : "';:- ': - L! li. rll*-, '65 Ii-:i=,{$ I.i1 Li I:.1 '.--j= : , I 4j,?(q : \ \' \!\ f" \$"9?)4FuI trr {' d\ --\o.. dE revis€d LO/5192 -P'ifi:,li\: I61995,Application Date PEC MEETING DATE I. APPIICATION This procedure is requiredvariance. the application FOR A VARTAT.ICE for any project requestj-ng awllL not be accepLed until aIIinformation is submitted. A.NAME OF APPLTCANT ./ADDRESs (.,9o t) . Lr"-tt/t n P-. B. I monnss f/-r-- PHONE NAME OF owNER ($) OWNER(S) (type or SIGNATURE (S) ADDRES$ HONE D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL DESCRTPTTON: LOT 2 BTOCK-- rL rn mc /a,c / L,-*sfuy lA o t). FEE $2s0. oo ,6nwcx * ADDRESS ilftu/'t= E. THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. F- stamped' addressed envelopes of the names of owners ofall property adjacent to the subject propert.y INCLUDING PROPBRTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, AhO A riit Or thEirnames and mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BERESPONqIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES. rr. A pre-application conference with a pranning staff member isstrongly.suggested Lo det.ermine if any addiiionalinforrnation is needed. No applicat.ioi will be acceptedunless i-t is comprete (must incrude al-1 items requiied bythe zoning adrninistrator). IL is the applicant.sresponsj-bility to make an appointment wiln trre staff t.o findout about addltional submittal requirements. III. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREA}4LTNE THEAPPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASTNG THE NUMBEROF CONDITIO}IS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CQ}4MISSION (PBC) MAY STIPULATE. A]-,L CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFbFE ABUILDING PEBUTT ]S ISSUED. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATBMENT OF THE PRECISB NATURE OF THEVARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATTON INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: 1. The relationship of the requested variance toother exist.ing or potent.iar- uses and struct.ures inthe vicinit.y. Iry:?'::.::"$i:l,ii'li5 *1::fiJl':;'u"'specified regulat,ion is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment amongsites in the vicinit.y or to attain the objectivesof this Litle r^rithout grant of spec j-al privilege. The effect of the variance on light and air,distribution of population, transportation,traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. How your request complies with Vail's Comprehensive Plan. A topographic and/or improvemenL survey at a scale ofat least 'J," = 20t stamped by a Colorado li.censed surveyor including locations of all existing improvements, including grades and elevations. Other elements which must be shown are parking and loadingareas, ingress and egress, Iandscaped areas and utiliLy and drainage features. A site plan at a scale of aL least L" = 20' showingexisting and proposed buildings. A11 preliminary building elevations and floor plans sufficient to indicate the dimensions, general appearance, scale and use of all buildings and spacesexisting and proposed on the site. A preliminary title report to verify ownership and AA qA'nANl. C If the proposal is located in a rnulti-family development which has a homeowners' association, thenwritten approval from the associaLion in support of theproject must abe received by a duly authorj-zed agentfor said association. Any additional naterial necessary for the review of theapplication as determined by the zoning administrator. For interior modifications, an improvement survey andsit.e plan may be waived by the zoning administ.raLor. IV. TIME REQUIREMENTS ? c. G. A. A.v. The Pl-anning and Environmental- Commission meets on the2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A complet.eapplication form and all accompanying material (asdescribed above) must be submitted a mini-mum of four(4) weeks prior to the date of the pEC public hearing.No incomplete applications (as determined by the zoningadministrator) wil-I be accepted by Lhe planning staffbefore or after the designated submitLal date. AIl PEC approved varj.ances shalI lapse if constructionis not' commenced within one year of the date ofapproval and diligently pursued to completion. T€ f ]^.i ^ ^..^1.i ^-!.1rr Lrrrs apprrcacion requires a separate review by anyIocal, StaLe or Federal agency other than the fown oiVqiI, the application fee shal1 be increased by$200.00. Exanples of such review, may includel but arenot linited to: Colorado Departmenl of Highr^ray AccessPermits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, eLc. The applicant shall be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are in excess of 5Oa oi tneapplication fee. If, at the applicantrs requestr anymatter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter cobe re-published, then, the ent.ire fee for such re-publication shaLl be paid by the applicant. lt c. De any Depa l .l applic otber cotnmun Lown sstaff outsi money be fohe fil applic forwar consulshalIby theappli ; "T:T:o"?;":li"ffi^5::1il"I:*:oT::' ".ssues which may have a significant impact on thety may require review by consultants other that,ff. Shou1d a determination be made by the townt an outside consultant is needed to reviewJ-ication, Community Development may hire anconsultant, it shall estimat,e the amount ofecessary to pay him or her and this anount shallarded to the Town by the applicant at the times his application with the Community Developmentt. Upon completion of the review of thet,ion by the consultant, any of Lhe fundsby the applicant for payment of theant which have not been paid. to the consultant within 30 days of notification by the Town. e relurned t,o the applicant. Expenses incurredTown in excess of the amount forwarded by thent shall be paid to the Town by the appticant. t.1toltlj,o Date of Application Date of PEC Itleet,ing ! I ') l8t$!Nov I 6 l99s I. c|\llolt toR tlmRroR ll.rtRllroxsItlcf,tlonS llf col|rncrrL coRr rr LrorysttlD Planning and Environmental Comnission (PEC) review isrequired foq the alteration of an existing building which adds or remdves any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio orthe replacenlent of an existing buiLding located in the CCII zone Distriqt. FoLLoT{ING pEC AppROVAt, THE PRO,IECT MUST BE REVIEWED BY ITHE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB). applicatiion will not be accepted unit all infornation fees i subnitted. toclrma)'nar,n, L.t\ott t^.rt urw The and A.APPLICANT ADDRES B.NA}'E ADDRES c.NAlilE OFI OWNER(S) 8I (s) ADDRES *rrrr;fly* REPRESENTAT PHONE PH HONE DESCRIPTION )ar NAITIE D. E. LOCATI OF PROPOSAL: L-o{ ADDRES FEE ti (LESS TBN.| 100 (MORE THAN 1OO THE TEE UI'SI BE PAID BEFORE THH r.lril4UNlTY DEVELOPMENT ACCEPT YOUR PRCi'!l-,iL.DEPAR WILL II.PRE-APPLICAT ON CONFERENCE: A pre-application conference with a planning staff nernber isstrongly sugpested to determine if any additionalinfornation [s needed. No application will be acceptedunless it is complete (must Lnclude all itens required bytbe zoning apninistrator) . It is the applicant, sresponsibilify to make an appointnent with the staff to findout about additional submittal requirements. III. PLEASE NOTE 1THAT A CoIPITETI APPLICATION WILL STREA}'LINE THE APPROVAI, PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECREASING THE NU!{BER oF CoNDITIONF OF APPROVAL THAT TgE PE:C lklAY STIPULATE. & CONDITIONS OF APPROVAI, MUST BE COMPL];; WTTH'BEFORE A BUILDING PERI,IIT IS ISSUED. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. fmprovement survey of property showing property lines and location of building and any irnprovements on the land - B. Stampedt addressed envelopes and a list of the names of owners pf all property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDITIG PROPERTY BEI1IND AI{D ACROSS STREE?S. THE APPLICAIIT IIILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES. FT. ) FT. ) -,{en s 5;ots'?c* *-@f!*sY A-fuA,'o 6-h1*aC,..P^A**'/tzb' {E3S s0. sQ. .00 .00 \ SuOmtt lr (4) coples of a site pIU containing thefollowing information : 1. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24n x 36" at a scale of l-" = 20' showing existing and proposed improvements to the site. Avariation of the sheet or scale may be approved bythe Community Development Department if Justified. 2. The date, north arrow, scale and name of the proposed deveJ.opment wit,h it's 1egal descriptionshall be shown on the site plan. 3. The existing topographic character of the siteincluding existing and proposed contours. 4. The Locatj-on and size of all existing and proposedbuildings, structures and irnprovements. 5. The existing and proposed landscaping, patios, addi-tions or deletions. 6. A title report to verify ownership and easements. 7. Preliminary building eJ"evations, sections, andfLoor plans, at a scafe not smalLer than one-eighth eguals one foot, in sufficient detail to determine floor area, gross residential floorarea, interior circulation, locations of useswithin buildings, and the generaL scale and appearance of the proposed development. IV. THE APPL]CAI{T SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITTEN AND GRAPHIC FORM A PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION INDICATING TTIAT : c. A.THE PROPOSAL IS IN CONFORMANCE T{ITH THE PURPOSES OF THEccrr DrsTRrcr As spEcrFrED rN 18 jE.oL0: 76B. THE PROPOSAL SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH TITE VAIL LIONSHEAD URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN REGARDING: 1. Height and Massing2. Roofs3. Facades - walls/struct.ure4. Facades - transparency5. Decks and patios 6. Accent elements7. Landscape elements Many of the above it.ems should be addressed by graphic means, such as aketches, models (including neighboringbuildings), photos, etc. If the applicant is proposing a major change to theVail Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan, tbe procedure for changes are noted in Section L8.26.180(B). C. THE PROPOSAI IS COMPATIBLE WTTH THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE TOWN OF VAIL ZONING CODE FOR CCII ALSO DESCRIBES OTHER ZONING ISSUES THAT THE APPLICANT MUST RESPOND TO IN WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC FORM. VI, THE ZONING ADMIN]STRATOR MAY DETERMINE THAT ADDITIONAT MATERIAI, 15 NECESSARY FOR THE REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION. VII.APPLICATI CCII II{VOL ONLY OR BEFORE PLAI{NING VIII. }' t*rr*roR ALTERATTo*s o*JDrFrcArroNs rN IG UORE IITAII 1OO SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA ARE PRELIMINARY EW SESSION !{ITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE SUBMITTALDATE. A P IC HE,ARTNG SHALL BE HEI,D WITHIN 60 DAYS OF TTTE PRELIMINARY OF AI\t AXIST FLOOR AREA AT THE REQU RSVIEW SESSION. APPLICATIONS FOR THE AJ,IERATION RED TIME OF T}IE MONTH FOR PLANNING A}TD ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION REVIEW. FOR MORE SPECIFICS ON THE REVIEW S uLE, SEE SECTTON 18.24.055 (A5). SEUT-ANNUALLY. THEY NEED TO BE ST'BMITTED ON FOURTH MONDAY OF MAY OR NOVEMBER. THE ETWIRONMENTAI COMMISSION (PEC) HOLDS A G EUILDING TITAT ADDS OR REMOVES A}IY ENCLOSED NOT MORE THAN lOO SQUARE FEET MAY BE SUBMITTED B. c. A. If thi$ spplication requires a separate review by anylocal, lstate or Federal agency other than the fown oiVail, $be application fee shall be increased by$200.0q. Examples of such review, may include, but arenot li4lited to: Colorado Department of Highway AccessPermit$r Arny Corps of Engineers 404, etc. The applicant shall be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are in excess of 50t of theapplicfltion fee. If, at the applicant's requestr :roymatterjis postponed for hearing, causing the matter tobe re-published, Lhen, the entire fee for such re-publicption shall be paid by the applicant. Applicbtions deemed by the Community DevelopmentDepartlnent to have significant design, land use orother [ssues which may have a significant impact on the comrnunli,ty nay require review by consultants other thattown st.aff. Shou1d a determination be made by the townstaff that an outside consuLtant is needed to reviewany application, Conmunity Development may hire anoutsidp consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money fiecessary to pay him or her and this amounL sha].lbe forparded to the Town by the applicant at the timehe fil-bs his application vrith the Community DevelopmentDepartfoent. Upon completion of the review of theapplicption by the consultant, any of the fundsforwarped by the applicant for payment of theconsulltant which have not been paid to the consultantshall pe returned to the applicant. Expenses incurredby the] Town in excess of the amount forwarded by theapplicant shalL be paid to the Town by the applicantwithiq 30 days of notlfication by the Town. o MEMOFANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Gommunity Development Department January 24,1994 A request for a height Condominium building Lionshead 3rd Filing. orfgti variance and a major exterior alteration of the Antlers located at 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1 Vail f F' flr?rrrr'r k [J,# i, i TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJEGT: Apdicanl: Planner: Bob Levine for the Antlers Condominium Association Randy Stouder The aoplicant is requesting approval of an application for a major exterior alteration and a height variancerto allow lor the construction ol nsw elevator landings and walkways that will provide ai:cess to all levels of the condorninium building. The applicant also proposes.to construcl an "L- shagrcd" solar ptexl$tass and aluminum structure to enclose and protect the new above-grade Elevator fandings and walkways fronr axposure to th6 weath€r. The enclosure would wrap around .he west and north sides of the existing elevator tower and stairuell, extending out approximately 6 feet in both directions. The enclosure would extend from the parking deck to the base of the eighth floor, The buildirlg height will not change, however, a height variance is necessary since the existing elevator towEr exceeds the 48 foot heioht restriction in the CommercialCore ll (CCll) zone dislrict, and since the proposed enclosure would extend to a helght of 58 feet above existing grade. A t€n toot height variance is requested. II. BACKGROUND This application rvas generated in an attempt to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) provisions related to access fol the disabled. The curent elevator has only three landings which are located betwoeh the second and third, the fourth and fifth, and the sixth and seventh floors. Stairs must be used to access any levet of the condominium building except the ground ffoor level. The applicant propose to locate ne$, elevator landings on the 2nd through 7th levels, which will provlde dlrect access for disabled individuals to condominiums on these levels. The applicant also proposes new elevator doors which will allow access to ths ground floor level and the conference center level. Thus, access for disabled individuals will be providEd to all levels of the building. III. ZONING CONSDERATIONS The following summarizes the applicable zoning statistics related to this exterior alteration request. The proposed enclosure ol the elevator landing areas will result in the addilion of approximately 668 square feet of common area. No additional GRFA is proposed. The existing maximum height of the building is 71 feet; the existing height of the elevator shaft is 58 feet, A height variance is necessary since tho proposal will increase the area of the building that exceeds the 48-loot height restriction. The requested adclitional enclosed floor area would be located over exisling building and parking deck areas, thus, there will not be any increase ln site coverage. A. B. c. Zone District: Lot Area: Allowable GRFA: Existing + Proposed Common Area: D. Height Limitation: Existing building height: Existing height of elevator tower: CommercialCore ll 52,390 square feet (100o/o buildable) 0.80 x 52,390 = 41, 912 square feet = 14, 173 square feet 48leet 71 feet 58 feet Allowable Common Area: 0.35 x 41,912 = 14, 669 square feet Section 18.26.045 of the Zoning Or:dinance requires that any proposal for an exterior alteration ol a building.located in'the CCll zone district must comply with: the purposes of that zone district, all appllcable elements of the Vail Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations, ind the Vail Gomprehensive Plan. The proposal should not negatively alter the character of the neighborhood. The Vail Lionshead Urban Design Gulde Plan contains sub-area concepts which identify specific areas for future developm€nt and oher desired improvements. The Design Cortllderations portion of the Guide Plan express general architectural and urban design conoepts that will be applied to any development ln the Llonshead area. Ths Vail Land Use Plan containg general goals and policies that pettain to any development within the Town. The following sectibns ol this memorandum provide relevant citations from the design and planning documents mentioned above. These citations are followed by a short discussion of the issues related to the application. o v[. v, cqnPLrANcE tvrTH THE PURPOSE SECTTON OF THE COMMERCTAL CORE I ZONE DISTHICT 18.24.010 Puncose: 'The'Commercial Core ll District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple dwellinge, lodges and commercial establlshments in a clustered, unified development. The Commercial Core ll District, in accordance witr the Vail Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan and Ddsign Considerations, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open spaco and othef ameniti€s appropriate lo the permitted types of building and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the district by establishing appropriate site de\relopment standards." It is tie staff's opinion that the proposed change to. the AnUers Condominium Building is in compliance with the purpose section ol the Gommercial Core ll Zone District as stated above. Vl. COITIPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL LIONSHEAD DESIGN GUIDE PLAN There are no specific sub-area concepts relevant to this proposal. The following design considerations are a critical element of the Urban Design Guide Plan. They identify the key physical characteristics of Lionshead and provide the tools to ensure that development is consistent with the established character of the neighborhood. The design considerations include the following: A. Height and ilessang: While the application does not increasE the maximum height ot the building, it does' increase the overall mass and bulk of the bdilding by adding and enclosing additionalfloor area around the central portion of the structure. The addition extands the taller portion of the building further west, and partially impairs views ol the Vail mountain ski area lrom 'the Radlsson building and pool deck. Staff acknowledges he apdicant's desire to comply with ADA requirements by providing access for disab'led individuals to all levels of the building. The applicant has explored sweral other options and maintains that the proposed alternative is the only feasible approach lo providing the required accass short of major re-construction within the building. A memorandum from Rob Levine to the Antler's Condominium Association Board discussing the alternatives is attached to this memorandum. B. Rooflng: The applicant proposes a shed roof on top of the seventh floor landing errclosure. The proposed rqofing materials are solar plexigtass in aluminum fenestration. Details of how th€ $h€d rool will tie into the gxisting roof lines over he elevator tower are not apparent from the materials submitted. The drawings indicate that the new enclosure would not 3 extend up and connect to the existing roof line on the westem side of the elevator shafi. Extending fie enclosure up to tie into the existing roof lines would increase the height of the enclosure approximately half a floor. However, this extension would tie the structure into frte €xisting architecture and reduce the "add on" look of the enclosure. This would allow the extension of the existing roof over the enclosure. Two separate roof pitches are proposed, ons to $e west and one to the north. How these pitches come togefter at the northwest corner of the roof is not explained. The proposed roof design aprpears to shed snow and ice in two ssparate dir€ctions. One roof pitch would shed snow to the north, down onto the roof over the entrance to the condominium offices. The oher pitch would shed snow onto the pa*ing structure along the west side of the proposed elevator landing enclosure. Snow shedding onto the parking structure raises pedestrian safety concerns. Snow shedding and roof drainage provisions, and roof line compatiHlity and design issues need to bb explored in more detail. The applicant has been made aware of these issues, ' and mey will be addressed duritlg the design review portion of the exterior alteration applicatlon process. C. Facade Wall Structures: Smoked, tempered glass in anodized aluminum feneslration has already been used in existing widdow treatments throughout the buikling, and to provide a foyer at the entrance to the condominium offices. Solar plexiglass was installed on the stair tower. Concrste, glass, metial, wood and stucco are the primary materials used in Lionshead. Thus, these materials are prefened and r€commended in the Design Guidelines. The app[cant proposes to construct ths- enclosure using'bronzed plexiglass lramed by anodized aluminum fenestration. Statf believes that smokd, tempered glass is a more' appropriatei permanent building material than plexiglass. The applicant has agreed to this change in materials. D. Facade Transparency: The facade transparency guidelines are generally applied to ground floor commercial developrhent, and are not applicable to this application. E. Decks and Patios: Decks and patios are nol included in the application. F. Accent Elements: The goal of the architectural design for the enclosure should be to blend the structure into th€ existlng builcling and prevent the enclosure from looking like an "add-on". To achieve this goal, it may be desirable to duplicate or extend existing materials and architectural featutes. An example of this would be to construct the enclosure so that the existing roof llne could extend down to form the rool over the enclosure, as discussed above. lt may also be desirable to utilize a capping accent composed of he existing concrete aggregate facade that is used on the elevator shaft tower. These design issues will be presented to the Design Fleview Board during the design review phase of the application process. G.Landscapo Elements: The applican! is not proposing any landscaping. Staff feels that the existing timber planter, locatect in front of th€ condominium offices, could be extended out to the sast, north and west, with additionalplant materials placed to help soften the appearance ol the relTtively stark north elevation ol the building. Aspens trees would enliven the north elevation, particularly during non-winter months, and would help to draw pedestrian atenlion away from thg upper levels of the building where the increased mass and bulk of the enclosure will have the greatest impact. H. Servlce and Dellvery: The proposed expansion will not affect cunent service and delivery patterns. VII[. COilPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL LAND USE PLAN "G.@!L The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible." As stated previously, the main puryose of this application is to upgrade an existing lodging' development by providing access to accommodation units and conference facilities for disabled individuals. However, architectural compatibility, landscaping, and visual impacts related to ths proposal must be analyzed and adclressed appropriately. These issues are discussed above. IX. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code requires, that prior to granting of a variance, the commission must consider the following factors. Consideration of Factors : 1. The relationshlp ol the requested varianc€ to other existing or potential uses and structures In the vlclnity. The proposed enclosure will increase the mass and bulk of the building and will partially impair views of Vail mountain from the Radisson. The Planning and Environmental Commisslon must weigh this impact against the desire/need of the Antlers Condominium Association to provide access to lodging and conference facilities for disabled individuals. 2. The degree to which reliet from the strict and literal interpretatlon and enforcement of a specified regulatlon is necessary to achieve compatibility 5 and unllormity d trsatment among slt€ In the vlclnlty or to attaln the oblectlyos ot this tltle without grant of speclal prlvllege. The Antlers Gondominiums were constructed prior to enactrnent of the currenl 48- foot'height restriction in the CCll Zone DisiriA. Thus, the cunent building is nonconforming in regard to its heigfrl. A height variance is required to allow the construction of the proposed elevator landings and enclosura The variance will nol provide the building with acklitional usable space; it simply provides access lo all floor of the building for disabled individuals. The ADA requires that the Antlsrs building to be accessible for disabled individuals, and thE applicant is trying to provkle accessibility in tho mo$ feasible way. Approval of a height variance will not provide Antlers with any special privilege, nor will it increase the existing maxirnum height ol the building which is currgntly 71 feet. 3, The eltect oJ the requssted varlanco on llght and alr, dFtributlon ot populatlon, traffiportetlon end tnillc ilcllltles, publlc tacllltles and utlllties, ind public aafety. The request will have no effect on light and air, with the exception of the lmpalrment of vigws from the Radlsson as mentioned in the discussion under factor #1 above. The request will not adversely atfect the distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public faciliti€s and utilities, or public safety. B. 1.That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent wlth the limitations on other properties classified in lhe sarne district. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the viclnity. That the variance is warranted for one or moro of lhe following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcsment of fie sPecified regulation would result in practicaldifficulty or unnecessary physical hardshlp inconsistent with the objectives of this tiile. b. Thare are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcernent of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enioyed by the owners of other propeflies in the same district. o X. STAFF DISCUSSION AND FECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending epproval of fre application tor a height variance and approval of the application for a major extErior alteration to allow the construction ol the proposed el€vator landings and enclosure. This recommendation is based on the opinion of staff that the strict imposition of the height restriction provision of the Zoning Ordinance would prevent the applicant lrom addressing the access provisions of the Amerlcans with Disabilities Act in the most feasible and etfici6nl mannsr. We leel that the requested variance will not have an adverse impact on the adiacent structures and uses, except for e minor impairment ol visrrs of Vail mountain from hF Radisson property. rAooroving the varia.nce will not extend any special privilege to the Antlers Condominium Associatibn, hgwever, it willallow the:association to comply with the ADA and thus improve the quality of ttne accommodation services in the Lionshead area. Staft recommends approval of the request with the lollowing conditions: 1. The applicant shall use smoked, tempered glass instead of plexiglass in the construction of the enclosure. 2. The applican! shall design the roof over the enclosure so that it will not shed snow and ice down onto p|rking or pedestrian areas. 3. The applicant shall extend the existing planter, located in front of the condominium association otfices, approximately four leet to the west, three feet to the north, and 20 feet to the east (to the easlern-most comer of the association offices). The applicant shall install a minimum of lourteen to sixteen 2" caliper (or larger) aspen trees, along with other low growing shrubs and/or flowering planb to fill in the planter. +q \ $rsh\l ht Ns I o Wss--o ia4/ Y4 I '7lh ii{ei --.- L|-=4r1 )brh Fw- Acr> FLF. NEw gLgvAT@r"?, PR.'-'. txlfTlNCt CoF.FttjDA / .i..-i'-1.1-):, f /t..r"r'*'? rrr. iI r I \--..t 1// -"':=\..- J , L.-.-,1 V t $ <-7 54, $. :g- $r .g 31l 7 5 -l IU 2 ,$. s$fs-uli : ir.$uqf, hiq il 3i[ ; i ,< 54 {\ o +"-)-t L---. \ \AJ€- -4 s -/iu.-=7t -a* (f n .1 --r:i. )-\5 \3 o \ 3 U -r-*-J O.I .L- 5!r't---'-:: +F_i I I -:.! ,Ti't. )- ..s5'\3 o r t L-A- JL qZ\:3p \\ je, -a-A "n-'z?,-* -g& %\=-eS u 3 qJ t 74 1 5 ? t t,.4r\i* I t. i: t:, ii 11 i, t 1r ; "i.hF€ ,t..-'..t. --r ti . : ,'. [:: ''+ -. ., li : : '. 1..' r .iilii,i i- ,i- li; fr.,, .i l', :. ' r./;:i,l,i jii n i: li i :;,. aii iri ii \J 1,'lii,,,: LL i,liii'.i,lii , : .'i,;1,i,{ ". :':;'lj.i: I tt o l' I II I I I .,: l-- -It I L l'l\ Ll-l-Tir\ b' '\+_..\\iffit-t il|s\ ll;"1,'''+\ll, \\.\1* / E|----..-_rlrl L.Y- -+-- - Y\\lxs)rA \-s,t H*? F€, __.rs s5 ? ? I I I I :::=*li 4 ?q #t 't : :\.'r\, '+'u tl sr ? I; ..1 irt _1iu ,1 (!J j- . i,i'.. t\ Nnl-l .?sc e2 \r\i\ bE 6[ c,! {,d\rit I t; ..1i'Z ill '7 IIJf '.:i.;., : \t k'' i,' b3 ,; x$,'r*i...1 =7jrl m t;1 5 s t-l n s, Ir* PT|-ni{ 1Ei 9nflit 3Zul ?- 4NTL€R '#SA T \AIL MEMORANDUM Date: ].ov€$lber 16. 1993 Fram: .\nt I ers Condomi ni un .r\ssociation To: Tor..n of l.'aiI Corrmuni ty Development Department Si-r!: iect: El e.retor P-edes ign ir: an attempt to cornply with the Amer i cans with Disabilities Act [ADA], asi':."ii es to sinrplv inrprove the existing facilities for all su""t" and oraners.'tl:c .!ntlers rr'ou!.J like to apply for an exterior alteration as well as aireight va.iance in order to red,esign the existing erevator.. Tlie crigina! tand existing) elevator was built with three I andings. This,'iesri +-e the f ect that the .\ntlers has eight f loors. The landings are ";urrellti!* located betrveen the second and third floor: between the fourth andflftir floor: and between the sixth and seventh floor. other than the veryr-r';'-rnd floor rshich cal be entered on grade at the property;s east end. it isi*r:';ssible to access an,.' individual eondominium in the buitding withoutt akir:rr at Ieast seven steps. lrjhoever designed this elevato" had a ruriqueirjea irov.' to sa.ie monev or a very warped sense of hr-unor (or both). '\t'ter nnc're t!:en t1.:o .iears of investigation. the .Antlers would I ike to suhnitti-:e attacirert plan. o-rr original desire was to simply reprace the currenteievator in the existing shaft. It is centrally locatea, next to the lobbya:rri <!irectly accessible.fronr the upper parking iot. r:nririunately we foundthat the size of the existing shaft-was not large enough to accoumodat e aneie"ator '.r'h i ch met the strici size requi rements of ADA. The shaft iss::rrounderl r.iiLh the "twin T" prestress concrete construction that forms theu::ser parkin:r deck, Enlarging the shaft would mean havir[. to cut the "T's',.Tlris r';as deened far too expensive and difficult a project to ,ndertake. 'orrsesuent I)'. men)' cther locations were considered, and as can be seen fromthe attached sheet '!1 dated 5/12/93, three were drawn and presented to the''.::tl ers Cc-ndonr i n i,rn os'nership. Each had dif f iculty "t "c""ss to some portionof the building. as werl as negative inpact on some nurber of individualii";.!ilo!ti11ir!.' 'ierr's. -r-!ternate locations #1. #2 and #3 were not very werecei'rec ( s'r5''pi-ge- surprise). However. the idea of replacing the elevatort:i i ts cu!'reni ioeat ion was highry supported at the sepieoru." rgg3 orrners:rieeting. The o'r:rers votecl to ."rL"" tiremsel ves to p4y^ ro" irr. project.':rl'o'iri:il tr:e existin:r location ( shown as #J on the plans) was used. 680 West Lionshead place Vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-2471 rnx (303) 476-4146 t i ?he attached plans show an elevator which will directly access each of thefirst seven floors (4iEhth floor access is not reguired) as well as bothparklnE lots and the conference area? which are located at "half" levels.The only <iravrback is that while it will accqmodate a wheelchair. it does notueet the strict dinetlsions specified by i\DA. on the reconmendation of GaryIlurain. I discussed {he matter with Ran{v Dipner at "Meeting the challenge;'.an .rD't consu!.tation $ervice appointed by the u.s. Justice Department. Heinterpreted the size nequirements to be for new cons!I!$li-e! and that thererpdel of existing facilities such as ours only ""eui".d "hat was ,,readity achieveble". Based dn r1v description of the chanEer he thought our propo".l was cc*pletely approg|r i at e. our subroitted plans qequire new exterior landings to be constructed on floorstluee thro'-rgh seven. D.re to western e:(posure of the new elevator d,oors andthe resultinE weathel iroplications. we feel it is vital to enclose thoselen'.iings. Hence the necessity for an exterior alteration. The heightef tlie expanded area r+ill not be as high as the current topmost ridgeline ofthe buliding. which is ?1 feet above grade. However. it will be expandinsthe area r.rhich is 5E feet high, reguiring the height variance. liewing the buildinE from the north elevation. there is currently 125 linealfeet ieast to r+est) of ridgeline which is at the ?l foot heisht. Theelevator s!:aft which is 58 feet hiEh will be extended by six lineal feet ttothe r+'est). Each of these heights are teryrFered by the fict that nine feet isbeio'* tire upper parking level . Hhile technically above grade. the visualirnpact frc'B the street or from fi,adisson's swirming pool is actually nine feeti.ess than the 7! and 5t foot measurenents. The additional sguare footage created by the new I andings and wa I krc4vs willincrease the couuon area by a total of 633 square f eet. The present hal l,*'a.r,sare not enclosed. nor are the parking lots: so there is a total of 11,000saua!'e feet of existing cotrrnon area which consists of the followinsr: )leeti:rg Eoous 2600 s.f. Lobby 5i0Catering liitchen 250 Offices g5O Frr:plo1'ee Lrurchroorn Z0O Laundry 350Poci Esulp$sn1 200 Storagl 2300Telephoue Equiprraent 150 Maintenance Z5OStairwells/Lan<iings 2200 Ski storage 300F,estrocmslSaunas 500 Tlre nert' enclosure is pnoposed to be bronze plexiglass screen in anorii zed aLL::::inrrm fenestrationi. ?his will natch the- current f inish on the existingstair torser as l'ell aF that between the building and the upper parking aeck.,a t .r-. F;h.o n + Genera!. teVi:-re -}lanager Lot Area:52,390 (1 00% buildable) Allowable GRFA: Allowable common Gommon Area Pro plus Existing: .80 x 52,390 = 41 ,912 square feet .35 x 41,912 = 14,669 square feet 14,173 square feet (see summary chart below) FIRST FLOOR EXISTING COMMON AREA (souARE FEEI) ADDITIONAL COIIMON AREA PROPOSED (souARE FEET) 1 2,315 0 1.5 6,725 0 2 1,507 24 2.5 881 50 3 421 24 4 724 24 5 310 182 6 310 182 7 310 182 TOTALS:13,505 668 a:\AN'ILERS.GRF r"r -. :lI -:.I!---: TOWN OFVAIL o F 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 39 FAX 303-479-2452 December 10, 1993 Mr. Robert LeVine Antlers Condominium Association 680 West Lionshead Place Vail, CO 81657 Deparunent of Comnunity Deve lopment RE: Antlers Exterior Alteration Dear Rob: After our meeting last Friday, I met with Kristan and the rest of the planning staff to go over your application ior an exterior alteration and height variance at the Antlers Condominiums- As a result of that meeting, I developed the following information request list. Please submit the items detailed below as soon as possible. The Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) public hearing will be scheduled approximately three weeks from the date we receive this information. '1 . Floor plans for each level of the existing condominium building clearly indicating residential (GRFA) space versus common area. All existing common areas should be redlined (highlighted). Z. Plan view drawings of the new landings and walkways at each level, including 1/2 levels already in existence, up to the seventh floor. These drawings should indicate existing and proposed areas to be altered, created, or enclosed. 3. Up-to-date sunrey of the property indicating the lot size, buildable area (the area outside the 1oo-year flood plain), the 10O-year floodplain boundary, existing improvements (buildings, access points and parking), easements and the Gore Creek 50 {oot selback. On December 20, 1993, the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC)will be briefed on the nature of your proposal and will set the review period for the application. Pending the submission of the materials outlined above, staff will schedule a public hearing on the application. 'l t' Visual aids such as architectural renderings (colored) ol the proposed exterior alterations *ouU n"tp Gommission members and citizens undeistand the visual impacts of the project' Samples of the proposeO materiats (bronze plexiglass and ihe anodized aluminum) would also be helpful. I would like to sit down with you and discuss some ideas the Planning Staff have come up *iin i"g"rding tandscaping to mitigate the impacts of ths propose.d exterior alterations' Ftease-coorOlnate all subirission iitn me; cail me at479-2138 with any questions you may have. Mr. LeVine Dec. 10, 1993 Page Two Randy Stouder Town Planner 4NTL€R ,# 'A T \NIL IviEl,tlORANDUM Date: December 31, 1993 From: Antlers Condominium Association To: Randy Stouder, Town of Vsil plsnn.. Subject: Elevator Redesign I'u sorry it has taken so long to respond to your letter you can imag'ine, it's been a little hectic around hene. Please find attached the floor plans you requested with highlighted, as well as plan view drawings of each and new square footage highlighted. I have been unable to our property, but was told by several sources that the always sufficed in other similar remodels. I understand Vail has that Map on file. of December 10. As common ateas every floor with all locate a survey for Condominium Map has that the Town of I h_g11g attached an architectural site plan from 1976 that clearly shows theproperty lines in order that you may determine lot size. The accompanying engineering' topographical drawing fron 1976 shows Gore Creek and the steep embankment between the Antlers and the Creek. It is clear that one hundredpercent of the lot is buildable. I must aduit, I'm a rittle confused about your need for the stream setbacks, 100-year floodplains and easements. This remodel isn't taking place anywhere near the lot rines or Gore creek. we are only trying to remodel the elevatorin order to comply with the federal mandates of ADA. There will be absolutely no impact on the south side of the building which is next to the creek. A,lso attached are some pictures that show the existing building and existing materials (bronze plexiglass). The necessary enclosure for the new landings wirl exactly match the existing entryway, and closely match the 200+ exterior windows present in the building. Those windows have the same anodized aluminum frames proposed for the remodel, and although the windows are clearglass, they generrlly appear to be bronzed due to their location and the sun/shade. I will look forward to hearing if there's anything else you need. Robert LeVine General Manager 680 West Lionshead Place Vail, Colorado 81657 (303l 476-2471 FAX (303) 476-4146 ',i 'r a 4NTL(R ,ry SA T \\IL ANACENT PROPRTY OhNiM,S: Lionsquare Lodge 660 W. Lionshead Place Vail, O 8165? Radi sson Resort 715 W. Lionshead CircleVail, @ 8165? Montaneros Condminiuns 641 W. Lionshead CircleVail. Co 81657 -,-'-A r '\ llblq4- crc[act-t'1-s Gunf cLJ (Jt u 680 west Lionshead Place Vail, colorado 81657 (3og) 476-2421 FAX (3og) 476-4146 e THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vailwill hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town olVailon January 24,1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of VailMunicipal Building. In consideration of: 1. A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density MultFFamily, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more specifically described as follows: A parcel ot land in fie Sourhwesl Quarter of Section 14, To,ynship 5 Soulh, Range 81 Wesl of the 6lh Principal Meridian, more Panicularly described as lollo$,s: Beginning al a point whence a brass cap sel for a witness corner lor the west ouaner ot said Section 14, bears (Nonh 29 degr€es 28 minules 51 seconds West, 1073.08 feet Deed) (Nonh 43 Degreas 15 minules 02 seconds West, 915.96 feel Measured); Thence North 74 degrees 05 minules 19 seconds Easl, 10.76 teel: Thence 183.62 feel along lhe arc ot a curve 10 lhe right which are sublends a chord bearing Nonh 88 degrees 12 minules 30 seconds Eas1, '|81,76 ieel; Thence South 77 degrees 40 minules 21 seconds East, 62.77 teeli Thence 147.43 leet along the arc of a curve lo the left which arc subrends a chord bearing Nonh 86 degrees 36 minules 17 seconds East, 145.60 feer; Thence Norlh 70 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds Eas1,406.55 feel; Thence 54.10 feel along lhe arc of a curve to lhe righl which arc sublends a chord bearing Soulh 47 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds Easl,44.20 feet; Thence Soulh 14 degrees 25 minules 50 se€onds Wesl, 110,51 feet: Thence South 68 degrees 18 minutes 91 seconds West, 320.00 feel; Thence Nodh 19 degrees 07 minures 05 seconds We31. 50.00 feel; Thence Soufi 77 degrees 48 minules 4l seconds West, 160.'18 leetl Thence Sourh l0 degrees 53 min|.nes 33 seconds West,36.48 teel; Thence Norlh 87 degrees 40 minutes 06 seconds Wesl, :N17.72 leel: Thence (Nonh l l degrees 52 minutes 13 s€conds East, 130.00 feel tleed) Nodh 1l degrees 55 minules 31 seconds Easl, 129.75 feel Measured) lo lhe POINT OF BEGINNING. gearing trom G.L.O. record for Soulh half of S€crion line between Seclions 14-15. (G.L.O. record South 0l degtees 30.2 minutes East) (South 01 degrees 38 minules 32 seconds East Measured) Applicant: Juanita l. PedottoPlanner: Andy Knudtsen 2. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at 580 S. Frontage Road EasVan unplatted parcel localed between Vail Village 7th Filing and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way, 3. A request for a worksession for variances for road grade and wall heights and a major subdivision (Trapper's Run) to create thifi Hillside Residential lots to be located on Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ridge and Lots 16, 19 and 21 , Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally located north of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge Subdivision. Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: Applicanl: Planner: Vail Valley Medical Center Andy Knudtsen John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway Development Jim Curnutte Vail Associates, Inc. Jim Cumutte 4. A request for PEC review of the Vail Associates shop expansion conditions of previous approval. li , ...- 5. * A request for a maior CCll extedor alteration and a height vari:rnct to allotu for the enclosure of the elevator shaft lor the Antlers Condominiums located at 680 West Lionshead Place/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Uonshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: PlannEr: Antlers Condominium Association Handy Stouder t ai$i frz- o I :- ,I : ; i .l zl a\ Ir ii !, i gs ii FEa -.r-a2i Ei=gl a,:F li F It: xl . . qll l:!;1,- . d2? r'-t t HfT itF ;i: *i=E": ; i:. zt ^O 6a o t s at E I -1 I I, c I fl I t I !i5i tlE iEt rF9 Eh.iirtrirnl'3 T s$cn.ac9s99+ It;:etfif,;;f,at.t6rsqag19q9e= la:Eoolaurg-- 999999ggSSe =========J= Ei!i!:l"5.3-F"r--C> e- r. Iilr i ---,4,,1-=> =9?I:; i:! _"t :l i:3 :i:a e:F * -. <r I =r':t^i: I ,.' Ei;$ !F:fib -i9tt-(,9 r''l I EEsiE: i;iFi!€-"di;rti;: re ffiii;{ i9;eIH :.39i3; rFi?ia ,Fiiifl r;3ii: H.r'1;:;iii;tFft:ii; :t,;Yb TIi;iH ..* 9!A 3:/"i C ^:T !f;i; ! ; ;e n l-= :! '. :." ;: 't "! l ; ir >l QI : : itit iFE; 1E *E s{-9 Ig r$ foIr{:l E:r! ET gE t8 t.nI ffiiiiEgEii, IF 3,i H '...:i