HomeMy WebLinkAboutWEST DAY MARRIOTT REDEVELOPMENT 1 OF 2t
FIL E COPY
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of C ommunity Developrnent
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-21 38
n$ 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
July 30, 2003
Mr. Jack D. Hunn
Vail Resorts Development Company
Post Office Box 959
Avon, Colorado 8l 620-0959
Re: Release of Irrevocable Letter of Credit #3053 181
Dear Jack,
On July 29, 2003, at the request of Hyder Construction Company and Vail Resorts Development Company,
I completed a final inspection for the Town of Vail Community Development to veriff the completion of
the required improvements associated with the redevelopment of thrffi
Upon completion of my inspection, I determined that an approval could not be gra.nted at this time due the
presence of stored items in required vehicle parking spaces. I did deterrnine, however, that all exterior
improvements financially secured by the lrrevocable Letter of Credit #3053181 (letter of credit) were
completed to the satisfaction of the Town of Vail. Therefore, please accept this letter as written approval
from the Town of Vail for the release of the "letter of credit", held by the Bank of America, N.A., dated
December 24, 2002.
Should you have any questions with regard to the infonnation addressed in this letter, please do not hesitate
to call. You can reach me by telephone t (970) 479-2145 or by email at sruther@vaileov.com
Sincerely,
fl-'..-..*\ -- ?, *-r-t'*t
George Ruther, AICP
Chief ofPlanning
Town of Vail
{g r"n"uo" rt"
a
VnrL RrsoRTs DevELoPMENT CovPANY
C o N sr R u cr ro ru D E PA RT M E N T
December 20,2002
Mr. Russell Forest - Director
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
75 So. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
RE:Vail Marrlott Renovation
Phase lll/Buildlng I and Sitework
Check in Lieu of Bond
Dear Russell:
As requested, we are submitting the enclosed check from Vail Resorts, Inc', in the
amount of $635,988.75 as a security deposit to ensure completion of sitework,
landscaping and miscellaneous exterior details as weather permits in ttre Spring of 2003.
It is agreed that the Town of Vail will hold this check for up to ten(10) days before
cashing the check to permit Vail Resorts Development Company the opportunity to
replace the check with a bond or letter of credit. We have initiated the process and
anticipate being ready to exchange a bond for the check no later than the end ofnext
week.
Vice President
Construction Department
Development Company
n*9.
,
Q.e-,.atrcr-\S#J**Enclosures
JDlVcjw
-..'..-.-..,..--
V^r L Raaoira-735s
Vail Resorrs Development Cornpany . 137 Benchuurk Road . Post Office Box 959 . Avon, Colorado 8162G0959 ' (970) 845-2350 ' far (9?0) 845-2358 ' www.srow.cotrr
D.H
Vail
Vail . Breckenridge. Keystoneo. Beaver Creeko. Bachelor Gu.lch" ' Arrowhead $
TOWN O
il.o?5 IE5r! r:Oq L eI5q a?r: t5e t t80 Le5?lrF
Check Date: 20.Dec.2002 Check No. 075 165
umber I Invoice Date I Voucher Amount Available : Paid Amount
v58214 20.Dec.2002 00214617 635,988.75 0.00 635,98E.75
Vendnr Number Name Totel Discounts
00000125 88 Town of Vail 0.00
Check Number Date Handling Code Totrl Amount Discounts Taken Total Paid Amount
075 165 20.Dec.2002 10 635,988.75 0.00 635,988.75
V A-!,r Rr--oRTS
Bruce Wilcox
Projcct Manrge.r
Vxil R(8ort! Drvet,lxnr:nt OrrDpany
I"Jst Ofi,,c ln,x 959. ivon, Cotorrrir I t620_0959
13? BorcIrrrark ltoad, Avon. (ioldr.rlo 81620
fhone (97{)) 845-2:r,8 . fax (lrzt))l}r5-2:}5f3 . r.elt (9?{)) 3{Ir4U89br!rcew(drf.rilresrjrrs.s'i _-^-_\_---\^
V^ r! R.soiir
UCTION INC.
December 19,2002
Mr. Bruce Wilcox
Vail Resorts Development Co.
137 Benchmark Road
P.O. Box 959
Avon, CO 81620
RD: Yail Marriott Mountah Resort
@CI Job No. 22001)
Dear Bruce:
Following is the value of the work remaining to be completed after the issuance of the Temporary
Certificate ofOccupancy at the referenced project as requested by the Town ofVail Departnent of
Community Development:
Buildins Io Site Demolitionr Grading and Preparation. Sand/Oil Interceptor and Piping. Snow Melt piping
. Curb, Cutter, Loading Dock Drive and Sidewalksr Concrete Interlocking Paverso Stone Walls at Loading Dockr Site Lighting and Powerr North Entry ClockTowerr North Entry Timbers and Stoner Shutters
Total for Building I
Buildins 2o EIFS at East Elevationr Shuttersr Site Lighting and Power. Concrete Interlockine Pavers
Total for Buitding 2
Combined Building I and Building 2 Total
Landscaping
Grand Total for Bonding Requirements
$35,000.00
22,000.00
I1,500.00
25,000.00
5l,770.00
21,380.00
14,300.00
16,426.00
23,200.00
37,600.00
l1.000.00
$269,176.00
$12,750.00
17,000.00
38,073.00
4.800.00
$72,623.00
$341,799.00
$167.000.00
$508,799.00
Please let me know if you have any questions with regards to the above values for work remaining to be
completed
Sincerely,
Doug Thornpson,
Project Manager
543 Santa Fe Drive o Denver, Colorado 80204 r (303) 825-1313 o FAX (303) 825-3223. Email: bf,dgdng@Idcd@ e Website: www. hvderinc.com
NSI"RUCNON INC.
To:
CC:
X'rom:
Date:
Dor6 1uorrt7a56 Crtu Oul) trL7'fifl MEMORANDUM
George Ruther, Chief ofPlanning Town of Vail
Henry Pratt, Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Bruce Wilcox, Vail Resorts Development Company
Doug Thompsorl Hyder Construction
Scott Miller, Asst. Project Manager
December 19.2002
Subject: Vail Marriott Mountain Resort (HCI Job No. 22001)
Buildings I and 2 Exterior Work Completion Timeline (Revised)
The following is a list of incomplete exterior scope elements and estimated dates for completion
after issuance of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy:
Buildine 1:
l. North Entry and Clock Tower Floors 3-6 - January 8,2002
2. North Entry low timber roof and stone arches and slab - January 24,2003
3. Shutters - January 24, 2003
4. Landscaping - June 22,2QQ3
5. Curb, gutter and snow melted sidewalks - June 22, 2003
6. Loading dock sand and oil interceptor, slab andwalls- June?2,2003
7. Exterior Lighting and Street Lighting - June 22, 2003
8. East Elevation French Railings and Retaining Wall Railing - December 23,2002
9. Misc. Painted Elements at high roof areas - June 22,2O03
10. Completion ofNorth Turret copper roof - December 31,2002
Buildins 2
I l. Building 2 Porte Cochere landscaping - June 22, 2003
12. Exterior Lighting and Street Lighting at Porte Cochere - December 24,2002
13. Concrete pavers at Porte Cochere East sidewalk - December 21,2002
14. Concrete pavers at North Elevation - June 22,2003
15. Shutters - January 24, 2003
16. Landscaping - June 22,2003
Please call me if you have any questions.
BankofAmerica ?a
DATE: DECEMBER 24, 2002
IRREVOCABLE STA}IDBY LETTER
PAGE: 1
OF CREDIT NtTMBER: 3053181
BENEFICIARY
TOI'IN OF VA]L
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROADVAIL, CO 81657
APP].,,]CAIIT
THE VAIL CORPORATION
]-37 BENCHMARK ROAD
AVON, CO 8L620
AMOI]NT
NOT EXCEEDING USD 635,998.75
NOT EXCEEDING SIX HUNDRED THIRTY
FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY
EIGHT AND 75l1-OO'S US DOLLARS
EXPIRATION
,11[,Y 31 ' 2003 AT OI]R COUNTERS
WE HEREBY ESTABLISH IN YOI]R FAVOR OUR TRREVOCABI,E STANDBY LETTER OF
CREDIT WHICH IS AVAILABLE WITH BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. BY PAYMENT
AGAINST PRESENTATION OF THE OR]GINAL OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT A]iID
YOUR DRAFTS AT SIGHT DRAT'IN ON BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ACCOMPANIED BY
THE DOCTJMEI{I DETAILED BELOW:
BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED OFFICER
OF THE BENEFICIARY STATING THE FOLLOWING:
NTHERE }LAS BEEN A DEFAI'LT IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PT]BLIC ]MPROVEMENTS
REQUTRED BY THE TOI,IN OF VAI]-,, STATE OF COLORADO, PURSUAI{T TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN VAIIJ RESORTS DEVEIJOPMENT COMPANY AND THE TOITTN OF
VATL FOR THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUTRED AS SPECIFIED IN
HYDER CONSTRUCTTON, INC. ESTIMATE OF DECEMBER 19, 2OO2 FOR WORK TO BE
COMPLETED IN BUILDINGS 1- AND 2 OF THE VAII.,, MARRIOTT MOUNTA]N RESORT
REDEVELOPMENT PRO.]ECT.''
WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT DRAFT(S) DRAWN I]NDER AND IN COMPLIANCE
W]TH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILIJ BE DUI.'Y HONORED UPON
PRESENTATION, AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.
THIS I,ETTER OF CRED]T IS SUB.'ECT TO THE INTERNATIONAI-, STAA]DBY
PRACTICES T998, ICC PUBLICATION NO. 590.
IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ASSISTANCE OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS
TRANSACTION, PI_TEASE CAr_,IJ 2L3-345-0088 .
w G+rUry$
AUTHORIZED SIGNATI]RE
", !!\,-l'4\irAii GEHHARD
Bank ofAmcrica, N.A. Tmde Operrtions
Msil Cod€: CA9-701- I 9-09
333 S. B€audry Avenue, l9rh Floor, Los Arseles, CA 90ol7
00-35-0202NS8 9-1999_CA9 t9
ORIG]NAL
{3 Recycled eaper
DEC ?7
"AO?
A6:57 FR BANK -0F A|IERICA 1tg 345 AAIS.IO 919?6s.52szd
BankofAmerica ?a O
PAGE: 1
DATE: DECE!,IBER 24, 2OOz
IRREVOEABIJE STA}IDBY LETIER OF CREDIT NUMBER: 3053191
P,td?/@?
BENEFICIARY
TOWN OF' \TAIL75 SOIxTS FRONTAGE ROADVAIIJ, co 8155?
AUfHORIZED SIGNATI,'RE
' " IIITII^'ATIGENHARD
APPIJICANT
TTIE VAIIJ CORPORATION
137 EENCHII'ARK ROAD
AVON, CO 81520
AtIOUNI
NOT EXCEEDTNG USD 635,998.75
NOT EI(CEEDING SIX SUITONSP TIIIRTYFI\TE IITOUSA}ID NINE HT'NDRED NINETYEIGI{T nro zslroors us DoITL,ARS
EXPIR,ATION
,rulrY 31, 2003 AT OIJR COUIWERS
t{E HEREBY BSTABIJIF-II-IN YotJR FAVOR ouR IRREVOCABLE STAI{DBv TJETTER oFCREDIT WIIICH IS AVAIIABI,E WITIT BAI{X Or AT'IENiCA, II.A. BY PAYMENTAGAINST PRESENTATIOry 9!' TtrE ONrCl}Nr, OF TI{IS IJETTER OF CREDIT AI{DYOUR DRAFTS AT SI94T DRAWN ON BA}.IK OF-N,'E-IiiCA;-N:A., ACCOMPAIiIIED BYTHE DOEI'MEITT DETAII-,ED BELO!{: -
BENEFTCTARY'S srATEltENr PURPoRTEDLY srcNED By AtI AurHoRrzED oFprcEROF TT{E BENEFICIARY STATING trIE FOr,r.,OWrUE,
I'THERE HAs BEEII A qEFAVIJT IN.IIIE CONSTRUCTION oF PUBIIC IMpROVEMENTsREQUTRED By rHE TowN_oF vAii,, -b-iere oF 'aoioRtDol iunsuarrr ro rHEAGREEMENT BETl{EEN-v4rr, REsoRis oever-,opprer,ri Llcjlliarw At{D ?HE To?tN oFVAII., FOR THE COMPIETION OF-iMPNOiEMNMS REQUIRED AS SPECIFIED INrrvDER coNsrhucrr_olrr _INc,
-Bsrtlaiiii oF DEcEMBER le , 2oo2 FoR r{oRK To BECOMPLETED rN BUrLDiryqs 1 AtlD-t oF rgE vArIJ ttARRroTT MourqrArN REsoRTREDEVEIOPMEM PROJECT. I'
WE IIEREBY ENGAGE_WITE^YOp THAT DRAFT(S) DRAWN TTNDER AlrD IN CoMpIJrAlrCEWITH THE TERMS OF TITIS I,ETTER_OF- CREDIT WILL BE DUIJY HONORED TTPONpREsElrlrATroN, As spEcrFrsD sennilq.
Tlrrs IJETTER oF clEDrr rs suBilEqr ro THE TNTERNATTONATJ srANDBypRACTTCES 1998, rCC puBiJrcA?ioN-lro. ;;0, -"'-'*'-'^"
II_I_9V-EEQqTRE Alry_Ass_rsTANcE oR HAVE ArVy QUESTTONS REGARDTNG THrSTRANSACTTON, PIJEASE CALL rlj-t+s_ooaa.
tr--Q:rtt*4
CFIERVTJEFFERSONTo*)
Enl ct^|rrlcr N A. nldr tri<r.tios
Mril C.da CA9-?0-1-l r4tI) .i, l3trttt A|sl3. lrttftlccr! 0a, ,\rlsl* C tnt,
0+J920lr{S0 9.t r9g_Car t!
SIGNATURE
VarL REsoRTs DevELopMer,rr CoMpaNy
Bruce Wilcox
Proje{:t Manase.
Vail Rr:sorts Dwcl4xn€nl (i' t,ar.|
l'ost Offir'e llox 954 lvon, Glorado 8l(,Zo-0()5(,
l3? Brnchrnark Road. Aron. (iol,rrvlo lll{r20
I'hone (970) ttX;')-2:|arq . fax (970) Ij,15-2jtttt . ,r,ll ()?0) ;|9r)-.1,t,tjtl
O bm,,ew@)vdilresons.com -_-------\_-.--\^VArL R.BoRrr
Vail .Bi..Lenrnisc . K.tNtoneo. B.a!f (].c.tr. ltlchctor (;ut{jt,,' . {ri,whend
{l Recycted Paper
ORIGINAI,
Frr^.-F 12- rr{,
Depailment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
August 19,2002
Mr. Scott Miller, Asst. Project Manager
Hyder Construction Inc.
543 Santa Fe Drive
Denver. Colorado 802M Fax (303) 82s-3223
Re: Vail Marriott Mountain Resort (HCI Job No. 22001)
Dear Scott:
I received your memorandum dated August I9.,2002, outlining the estimated timeline for completion of the
exterior scope of work for the Vail Marriott Mountain Resort redevelopment.
Prior to signing offon an approval for the issue ofa Temporary Certificate of Approval, I need you to add
the timeline for the completion of the required sidewalk and curb/gutter improvements. As you will recall,
the permitted scope of work included the replacement of the sidewalk and curb/gutter along West
Lionshead Circle. Please refer to the approved building permit set of plans and the civil drawings for
further information on the extent of the improvements.
As we discussed and agreed, this work must be completed this fall (2002). Failure to cornplete the work
will delay the issuance of occupancy permits for the Phase I improvements.
Upon receipt of my letter, please revised your memorandum to me of August 19,2002, to include the
required sidewalk and curb/gutter work. Once revised I will review the memorandum and forward any
questions or concems to you.
Should you have any questions or concems, please do not hesitate to call. You can reach me by telephone
at(970) 479-214s.
Sincerelv
U*Q,;r-a
George Ruther, AICP
Chief of Planning
Town of Vail
{p *'"uo'n'""
UCTION INC.
MEMORANDTJM
To: George Ruther, Chief of Planning Town of Vail
CC: Hemy Pratt, Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Bruce Wilcox, Vail Resorts Development Company
Doug Thompson, Hyder Construction
From: Scott Miller, Asst. Project Manager
Date: August 20,2002
Subject Vail Marriott Mountain Resort (HCI Job No. 22001)
Building 2 Exterior Work Completion Timeline (Revised)
The following is a list of incomplete exterior scope elements and estimated dates for completion:l. EIFS systems at pyramid area - August i0th
2. EIFS systems atpool building-August 23d
3. Mansard Roofing East and West Sides - August 28'h
4. Pyramid High Roofing-August 30tn
5. Balcony Steel Railings - August 30rn
6. Misc. Exterior Punch List Items - September 6'n
7. Shutters - six weeks after final DRB approval
8. Lobby / Porte Cochere including landscaping-mid November
9. Snow melt side walks, curb and gutter inituOing euilding #l - by November l5th
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or concems regarding this list. I can be
reached either at thejobsite at (970) 479-5012 or on my cell phone at (303) 882-6238.
543 Santa Fe Drive o Denver, Colorado 802M o (303) 825-1313 o FAX (303) 825-3223 e Email: hyderinc@hvderinc.com r Website: www.hyderinc.com
UCTION INC.
MEMORANDUM
To: George Ruther, Chief of Plarming Town of Vail
CC: Henry Pratt, Gwathmey Pratt Schultz
Bruce Wilcox, Vail Resorts Development Company
Doug Thompson, Hyder Construction
From: Scott Miller, Asst. Project Manager
Date: August 19,2002
Subject Vail Marriott Mountain Resort (HCI Job No. 22001)
Building 2 Exterior Work Completion Timeline
The following is a list of incomplete exterior scope elements and estimated dates for completion:
1. EIFS systems at pyramid area-August 30ft
2. EIFS systems at pool building - August 23'd
3. Mansard Roofing East and West Sides - August 28th
4. Pyramid High Roofing- August 30th
5. Balcony Steel Railings - August 30n
6. Misc. Exterior Punch List Items - September 6'n
7. Shutters - six weeks after final DRB approval
8. Lobby / Porte Cochere including landscaping - mid November
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or concems regarding this list. I can be
reached either at thejobsite at (970) 479-5012 or on my cell phone at (303) 882-6238.
543 Santa Fe Drive . Denver, Colorado 80204 o (303) 825-1313 r FAX (303) 825-3223 r Email: hvderincfahvderinc.com r Website: www.hvderinc.com
oo
Exterior Punchlist Vail Marriottt
East Side North End ol Bldg. 2 (overview)
1 Dirt smudge above control ioint left side
North End Bldg.2
2 Touch up gutter between two down spouts
3 Brown smudge on white EIFS above & right of balcony door rm. 659
4 Touch up paint on EIFS on drop back between Rms. 659 & 661
5 Touch up paint on EIFS of balcony of rm. 661 (front & east side)
o Touch up paint on EIFS above door to 461 & to right of door
7 Touch up faux beam above door to 463
8 Touch up while EIFS left of door to 463
9 Patch & paint EIFS above door to 461
10 Palch & paint EIFS above door to 459
11 Touch up paint on EIFS left ol railinos on rm 261
12 Touch up paint on laux beams above rm 363
13 paint bolt & nut heads of french railing rms 359, 361 &363
14 Touch up paint on balcony EIFS under angle iron west side of rm 461
Wesl side lrom turlet north (overview)
15 Touch up sotfit of turret
16 Cap row of roof shingles from lurret north needs lo be finished
17 Replace broken window in rm 557
18 Touch up EIFS above window in 357
Balcony inspection north end of blds. 2
19 rm 659, touch up paint right of door & iusl above balcony deck
20 Replace bent section of down spout outside of rm 661
21 Rm 661 , touch up paint, right of door, and iust above decking
22 Rm 661, do same to left side of door
23 Bm 663, touch paint to right of door & iust above balcony deck
24 Rm 663, clean underside of soflit above deck ol 663
25 Rm 559 Touch up faux beam above balcony both sides of door
26 Rm 559, clean paint splatter off ol slider
27 Rm 561 , Remove piece ol hardy board wedqe between deck and wall right of door
28 Rm 561, touch up paint below faux beam right of door
29 Rm 561, Touch up paint of EIFS left of door
30 Rm 561 , clean underside of deck above
31 Rm 561, touch up paint on deck of railing
32 Rm 563, louch up paint to right ot door iust above deckino
33 Bm 563, clean under side of deck above
34 Rm 563, touch up paint and clean slider
35 Rm 563, touch up faux beam around door
36 Bm 563, clean up & touch up scralches on railing
a7 Rm 459, touch up faux beams
38 Rm 459, remove plastic between wall & deck above door
39 Rm 459. clean slider
40 Rm 459, clean underside of deck above
41 Rm 459. clean deck of rm 459
42 Rm 459, clean railing of rm 459
43 Rm 461 , touch up balcony face (white EIFS) east & west side (welder burns can be seen)
44 Rm 461 , touch up faux beams above
45 Rm 461 , touch up faux beams around door
oo
46 Rm 461 touch up paint on angle iron at deckinq level
47 Rm 461 , clean slider
48 Rm 461 , clean underside of deck above
49 Rm 461 , touch up white EIFS above door
50 RM 361, clean underside of deck above
51 Rm 361.touch up faux beams
52 Rm 361 , clean railing
53 Rm 361, clean theshold and surroundinq area
54 Rm 361 , touch up white EIFS on balcony above (steakino can be seen)
55 Rm 361,louch up EIFS above door
56 Rm 359, clean decking
57 Bm 359, clean underside of decking above
58 Rm 359, touch up railing
59 Rm 359, touch up and clean slider
60 Rm 359, touch up faux beams
61 Rm 359, touch up EIFS on deck above (streaking can be seen)
62 Rm 359, touch up faux beams around door
63 Rm 363, clean underside of deck above
64 Rm 363, touch up EIFS of deck above (streakins can be seen)
64 Rm 363, touch up paint of box tubing above
65 Rm 363, clean up railing
66 Rm 363, clean slider
67 Rm 363, touch up faux beams above
68 Rm 363, touch up laux beams around door
69 Rm 357, clean up top of laux beam above window (can be seen from deck of rm 459)
South Slde Overvlew
Connector Bldg. 1 to Bldg 2
70 Clean fascia
71 Paint bolt & nut heads on railing mounts
72 touch up White EIFS on balcony fronts (streaking is occuring) 2 upper balconies
73 Touch up bottom of white EIFS on balconies (the lower two balconies)
74 Joints between EIFS and sidng (2nd story) need caulking
75 Soffits need trim or caulking 2nd floor units
Bldg 2 Soulh Side Overvlew
76 Touch up siding above rm 426
77 Clean up or touch up siding in a column between rms 230 & 231 to 430 & 431
white dust showinq in this column
Balcony inspection soulh end bldg.2
78 Rm 128, clean under side ol deck above
79 " touch up siding-clean window exterior
80 " Touch up llashing below window and clean
81 " touch up white EIFS on deck above (streaking can be seen)
82 " touch up box tubinq on deck above
83 Rm 129, clean underside of deck above
84 " touch up white EIFS on deck above (streakinq can be seen)
85 " clean & touchup flashing below window
86 clean window exterior
87 clean or touch up siding left of window
88 caulk siding below window where it meets pool parapet wall
89 " finish detail below flashino on wall left of window
oo
90 " touch up box tubing on deck above
9'l caulk exposed toam on underside of deck above
92 " finish caulking directly above door
93 Rm 130, clean underside of deck above
94 " touch up box tubing and white EIIFS on deck above
95 " finish air venl right ol window
96 " repair siding under deck above riqht of window
97 " remove construction material from rool of pool
98 " clean exterior side of window
99 " touch up or clean faux beams above window
100 Rm 131 , shorten heat tape in gutter outside of window
101 clean exterior side of window
't02 " clean outside of slider
103 Rm 132, finish caulking around slider
104 " finish "roof drains" at edge of bldg. Between 132 & 134
105 " clean underside of deck above
106 " install french railing
107 " paint bolt & nut heads on railing
108 Rm 134, caulk around slider
109 Rm225, paint bolt & nut heads on railing
110 " clean exterior slider
111 Rm 227, Fill holes on trim of slider
't12 clean exterior door
113 Rm 228, touch up weld area on railing
114 " caulk foam on underside of deck above
115 " touch up siding
116 " touch up white EIFS above
117 touch up box tubing above
118 paint flashing where wing wall meets deck
119 counter sink screws on lrim of slider door
120 touch up paint on header trim
121 clean exterior of slider
122 Rm 229, paint around welds
123 clean underside of deck above
124 caulk foam on underside of deck above
125 " touch up or clean faux beams
126 clean the deck
137 Rm 230, clean exterior ol slider and rail
138 Bm 232, not linished can't punch
139 Rm 234, not finished cant punch
140 Rm 325. clean exterior & rail
141 " paint nut and bolt heads on rail
142 Rm 327, clean exterior door & rail
143 " touch up wing wall left of slider
144 " paint nut and bolt heads on rail
145 Rm 328, paint around welds of railing
146 caulk foam on underside of deck above
147 touch up EIFS above
148 counter sink protrudino screws on door trim
149 " clean exterior of door
o o
r50 Rm 330, paint around welds of railino
151 " caulk foam on underside of deck above
152 " touch up EIFS above
153 " clean exterior of door
154 Rm 331 , clean exterior of door
155 clean slider and rail
156 Rm 334, nol finished cant punch
157 Rm 428, touch up trim above rail right of door
158 ' paint around welds on rail
159 clean deck
160 " touch up door trim
161 Rm 429, paint around welds on rail
162 " clean slider and deck
163 * touch up scratches on rail
164 Rm 430, paint around welds on rail
165 touch up scratches on rail
166 " clean deck and slider
167 ' touch up door trim
168 Rm 431, clean French rail and slider
169 " touch up scratches on rail
170 Bm 432, clean exterior slider and rail
171 Rm 434, clean rail & exterior of slider
172 touch up fireplace vent
't73 Rm 532, clean elilerior of slider & rail
174 Rm 534, clean exlerior of slider & rail
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departnent of Community Devdoprnert
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Oolorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 tax: 970,479.2452
web: www,ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Marriott Exterior Improvements DRB Number: DR8020008
Proiect Descdpdon:.
Change to approved plan / Exterior modificaUons to Building 2
Participants:
OWNER HMC ACQUISmON PROPERTIES 101/1412002 Phone:
c/o MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
ONE MARRIOTT DR DEPT 938.01
WASHINGTON DC 20058
License:
APPUCANT Gwathmey Pratt SciulE Archi01/14/2002 Phone: 476-LI47
Henry Pratt
10fi) Frontage Rd West
Vail, CO 81657
License:
ProjectMdress: 715 W UONSHEAD CR VAIL Location:
Legal Description: Lot: C&D Blodc Snbdivldon: MORCUS SUB.
Parcel Number: 210107207001
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Woldrich Action: APPROVED
Seoond By: Acevado
Vote: 5-0 Dateof Apprcvalz Oil26l2OO2
Conditions:
@nd:8
(P|AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate revieu committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Tourn of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Pald: 120.00
seqt .u_ " 2.ACL 3,3i,[c|,urtvf CO[S-i,C-.0\ git-t|]_23it ,r,f ;]r i22:-)
Aplidbn frr Deragn Reuiew
_ _DaF fi|e tt of Cornmnnity Dei,rlopmcnt
75 Soudt Frcnbge Road, Vait, Colorado El6tEt: 970.479.21f9 ta\: 97e.q8.2452
e€b: t$rw.cr-yad,o-rE
6c|n|.l l;trlin:
lll]]TrF .q.qg d€slgl ry mu$ ,lcerrc app]or.t prior b subnritiog a Duildng DeFnit apprcadon. DtcrserEter !o 6r€ srbmittal requt€tinrG for be rnrticubr appmvar arat F reque;ed.- ii +ii#o" for De:ign Rgvrewcennot b" .cae@d urtit r requirud inbrmdion ,, .ii:n a Uy tne Cjn munr.v ift-"ii.irrt Depa,tDenr. Thepro,ect tnay ilso n€rd eo be r€vtewed Dy fie Tq,vn cornar ana/or the pbnning and Environrnerrtrl commssion,oEdgr tuir.ttnl bE *r e btrrc F;i Fir-5, -d coil3,'roo ffi."E= rftrircproltte?Jurd.
t-elLroftlrcFntrl: r-ot: L fDancr:_ suHivisir)n: MORcrrg 9ug,
etrygat Hi!E;
Frqf b.: Z lgt 01 2O1 trpl (Conbct Eagte Co. Assessor at 97G3ZB-8640 for Darcet no, )
zanir,pt
rbrr(s) dDrrr(s):
llaili;gAfttsc
Orntr(s)
t€r-d
lr|dhgffirs:
E-rnif Aftc=r:
rlFdRilir td Fc:- Signs
: Concepo/al Revtew
: New CorEtiuclon
- Mdition
I Hinor AEration
( multFfam y/Cornmeroa I)
: Minor AlEration
(single-brnily/duptcx )
X Changes b Approveo ptrns
C Saparetion Request
55C PtuI 51.00 per square foor of trbl sqn area.
No Fe€
s650 For @n*ruc$on of a ncrrv building or demo/rebuild.5300 For an addition wherc square foAge is addcd to .ny resrd€nuat or@mnercbt buiklng (hdudes 250 .ddtons & ioErtor conv€rsons).5z:u For mrrFr cnitnges tE brildings md *e mprovErn€rts, such t,rerpoftig, painting, wtnalow 3ddldons, randscrprng, fences and|ltltorng walls, rlc.520 For minor changes to Duilrtirlgs and site rmDrwern€nts, rlrcn d5,r€rodng, gatntng, wrndow additrons, tandsGping, fences andr€Elning wals, etr.t20 For radstons E pbrrs atreody Oproved bv ptanning Sff or ttre
Design Revievr Board.
No Fee
.r
eage 2
rOrr,tr 0F1ilt
V?D
Plr-:E-295U
tlE!:
For OEe u- O|lv: ;.j,- - ,-.
Fee Pad: ?a <>o M,no' Ofl9F Av.
iPbnner:
Julv 12,2OO2
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Marriott Mountain Resort
Minor modiftcations to approved plans
Dear George,
As previously discussed, we are submitting for DRB approval for several minor improvements
to the Marriott Mountain Resort property and for a temporary lobby in Building 3 to be used
while Buildings 1 and 2 are completed.
Specifically, we are requesting approval for the following:
1. Modifications to approved plans: Partial EIFS at Porte Cochere piers.
2. Modifications to approved plans: Porte Cochere lighting3. Modifications to approved plans: Deletion of stone veneer at south entry to the
Grand Ballroom (between 82 and 83)4. Temporary guest access to south entry of Grand Ballroom behind 83 for arrival
and check-in.
Partial EIFS at Porte Cochere piers
Following the DRB denial of our proposal to do the Porte Cochere with massive EIFS piers
and arches, the Owner has asked us to submit again with a much-reduced-E|FS hybrid
design. The only changes we are now proposing are to do the upper 213 of all the support
columns in white EIFS Dryvit color #101 . We are proposing to keep a stone base and all
other aspects of the approved heavy timber design. The intent here is to better tie the Porte
Cochere to the buildings it serves. The Owner feels that the approved design of all stone
piers is too different.
l00O Soulh Fronioge Rood \ry€sl, Sulle | (}2 . Voil, Colorodo 81657 . Tel: (97O, 176-1141 . Fox: (970)
"76-1612
. Emdl: gp.xvdlloool.com
George Ruther- Marriott minor modifications
July 12,2OO2
Page 2
Porte Cochere lighting
We are submitting the following for the Porte Cochere lighting:
At the support piers which border or are fully surrounded by pedestrian activity, we
propose to install step lighting in the stone base that will illuminate the walking
surfaces only. This is shown on the attached plan as fixture "D".
At the tops of the piers, we are proposing to install directional flood lights which
will illuminate the underside of the roof. These lights will be movable, the lamps
will be narrow flood type to minimize beam spread and the underside of the roof
will be cedar which will have lower reflectance. This is shown on the attached plan
as fixture "C".
At the driveway side of each of the piers flanking the driveway, we are proposing
large metal sconces (fixture "A"). Smaller on-the-wall versions of these fixtures
(type "B"l are also proposed for the street side of the piers at the bus-stop.
Finally, we are proposing several chain-hung chandeliers comprised of several of
fixtures in a "wagon wheel" arrangement. The fixture is a hanging version of the
type "A" fixture. One chandelier will be hung above the drive (type "F"l and a
smaller one will be hung in the roof bay outside the entry door (type"E").
Cut sheets of the fixtures are attached to this submittal. Cut sheets give lamp specs.
Deletion of stone veneer at south entry to Grand Ballroom
There are many reasons why we wish to delete the stone veneer at the lower 2 levels of the
connection building between buildings 2 and 3 but in simple terms the unusually high cost
and impact on the construction schedule makes stone veneer in this location an
unreasonable material.
The explanation in greater detail: This is an existing building and we have discovered that
the existing 2d floor walls do not align with the walls below by 6" to 8". In order to apply
the stone veneer, we need to remove the existing lower wall framing and install new walls
out in the plane of the walls above. This in turn requires new foundations to support walls
and veneer. Making this worse is the fact that much of the load of the second story stone
has to be transferred onto a small section of wall at the sides of each door. The new
foundations therefore become quite large and complex and require work within the building
as well as well away from the existing fagade. The cost for this new foundation work is
ridiculously disproportionate to the amount of stone being added in a location that will be
seen by very few people (even fewer when work along the creek begins next year).
Additionally, the impact of all this additional work on an already tight schedule is further
exacerbated by the fact that starting August 1 5'h and carrying well into November. this will
a.
b.
c.
d.
George Ruther- Marriott minor modifications
July 12,2OO2
Page 3
become the point of arrival for all hotel guests. There is not enough time left before then to
complete the construction above, remove the scaffolding and begin the substantial
excavations necessary for the new foundations,
The Owners are also very concerned about the potential life safety issues associated with
masonry work and other construction that will likely occur above the primary point of entry
to the hotel during the August/September season if the stone veneer is required to remain.
We therefore propose to delete all the stone in this area and replace it with the "tamale"
color EIFS. On the Building 2 portion of wall, we propose to use EIFS color #102 to match.
Temporary Hotel Access- August 15'n until November 1Sth
The new Porte Cochere and Lobby will not be finished until sometime around November 15h.
Most of Building 2 will hopefully be ready for occupancy by August 15m. Work on Building 1
needs to start immediately thereafter in order to be finished before the Christmas season.
The check-in desk, now temporarily located in Building 1 needs to go somewhere else before
August 15s. The location that is acceptable to the Marriott, the VFD, etc seems to be at the
south doot into the Grand Ballroom prefunction area between Buildings 2 and 3. To get
guests to this point, we propose to come down the drive between the parking structure and
Building 3, across a temporary gravel drive behind Building 3 and onto the remaining tennis
courts. Traffic would use the tennis courts as a turnaround and exit the way they came in,
Access from the tennis courts to the doors would be via the existing wood ramp or stairs,
The stairs would be rebuilt to be less steep and the entire pedestrian path from car to
doorway is proposed to be covered with the white awning that served the special events
tent that used to be on the tennis courts.
Lighting for the temporary drive would be via the existing north side sidewalk bollards that
would be temporarily installed for this use (the north side will be under construction so these
lights are not needed).
We have discussed this with Rob Levine and he has no complaints.
With this application we are looking forward to the DRB meeting on July 17th. lf any items
can be staff approved, it would save time for us and for the DRB.
Sincerely,
ARCHITECTS, P.C.
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
,
i** **'afl + *al **af* a'l'l * * t *lfl flff * *f'|!*a * t ***t *** * t* * | f*** * * * * t * +f*{t* *a*rf * t | *f t tf*+* *tat* a*a* *
TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Stat€m€nt
*ttafatlti*'lta*a*+*'iltt+tflffl'}l{"}aa**a*'}'}ll'}**a**'}'}****{t*+fttftftl**lf*tl*****t}f'laf*flft't'}l*
Seatenent Number: R000002?30 Anount: $20,00 07/!6/2OO2O8:10 Ail
Paytnent Dlethod: Cash Init : rIAR
NotsatLon:
Permit No: DR8020229 Tlpe: DR3-Chg to Appr Plars
Parcel No: 2LOLO72O7OOL
STTe AddregB: ?15 W IJIONSHEAD CR VATIJ
IJocation:
This Palment: 920.00
Totsal Fees: $20.00
Total AIIIJ Emts: $20.00Balance: S0.00
* *'ll* **t* * *'t * * *lll lt*{rf t*t*t t||ta!* lt*f{r* l**t* +*f*+ t t f**** ***'t{r****+'} *lf*t f**all*ttat+ala*lff*
ACCOI,JNTITEM LIST:
Account Code Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEIII FEES 20.00
Descri pt ion
"
ijl
\l
'r' .ii;-, u Yi
91, ; *-51Oi:': N IFt,fFs !
Ll.| r.- .t
-r .i -l-roii
zo
tr
$
tuJ
tu
Iz
tuv
tuI
\)l
ol\)l
I
HIvl
ol
tLl
\l
rU(i
rrl1
P,v\
utu
9sPQ^'F\= F: U
$$ fr f;it
$fi 88rt
UJo
fi
FtuV\)
fio
clxN
FltlVot
fi)
vtuI
tr
(\
xcl
vtu
9strg\z
>E
+8\t>
$f;
o
UIJI
=rt)
5
$
ILo
uItu
L
$
ofofztrzoo
a
,o
O
t
i
I
ql
d-l
I
cc
r.uzz
5g
"riol
FI
F'
l.itcl
t.
I
(
fi.
O- :...o-'
-ul o
luE FEUF r FFo
itF$$iE
$n tpnE$fi
ulo
o
Az.(
F
lU
v.o
f,o
Nxc{
Atu
il_tu
tLf
p
o(')5vF
vtu
9Etr9tz
>,
s8\t>
$f;
otuJ
\Dz
=o
[-J
$Lo{
FluVrJt
dt
clxo
\)rjl
IL
ot({)
luItu
L
v
A
olofztrzoo
'n'2
zo/rzf t
---
i
I
I
l
l
NI
4
otl
6
lL t\\E>^\\v\.
H
3
=i ti-=', li..-
rll
I
'd'2
7a/e2/L
INI
N
F
$g
J
3
$
'gz
s
s,
g
a
o
s
\-
h
.4
"'$f-t"
\' \,
Qt
h
E\)
0
1Lg
lt
$s
$
$
$
:f;
\t
6il
$u
{qF
tbr$t
F
F
Ht
$H
'/'? \.,
zoftz f\,
z
-l-
=
bft
()I
Fu
E
K
lb.llJl=o
l4J
(Ja
|jJ
z.
o-
C'ztrl-l:l a
5otiw$<=dgH;
d
o2
o
o
.x a
o-
3E
EG<-
f
z
2
'B:
to
,J,;
_l
3 b
g #
lt;L
2t
ilFh
.!IF
7t
z
F
e
3
qI
tI rl+
lz,
IFt-l(,
l=
E
c2
'l
I 6
L]
€l t.F
@5 I
I
=
=l I !I !
dzE
5o
6
o.E
I
d
=
.q
f
z
d
=z
sd<p
ca<
FErUEE
=rrtEe. vr9gI g.
E6'Ei58<)>
-a{
3
+
IT
,N
MODEL NO. FINISH NO GLASS NO. MDTH LENGTH EXT O/A MAX, WATTS-
79J5 1.2,3,6*,7 .8 - Et/2" J0" 12' J/@C
-7957 t.23.6*.7.8 - r}t/i 40" 14" 4/@c
-7971 r.2.3.6*,7,8 - 8t/i 20" 12' 3/&c
->
7971 r.2.J.6*.7.8 - r}t/t 26' L4' 4/6cii,
l-OldBronze,2-AntiqueBrass,J-Black&Brass,6-Verde,7-FolishedBrass,8-Adobe&Brass;SolidBrass
Glass: Clear Bevdled*Slotted chimney top is srandard on this Verde model. Spinning top is standard on all other models.
o
t0
9
IpDJL NO. FrNrsH NO. GLASS NO. \i(rIpTH LENGTH EXr O/A N{AX. 'ilATTs_4.1--, 1-2J.6.7.a - e,u' tg:ti' llii" 5/ioc-+
ryg_ Lz.t.o.t.a - nw zs, rii, ,tror,
-
7948_.,. 1,2.3,6.7.8 - tot/r" 21, 6, 3/60c!- Old Bronze,2 - Antique Brass, l-Back&Brass,6-Vetde,Z-Polish"JBrassR-A,l.h"&-q"'".-s"t;'rR',*
Glass: Clear Bevilled
11
tt€t'
ts
'.;..PBM-10 i. 2, l. 6. 7. 8 - 8" x 8" 11" - -PBM-)0 l.2,].6.7.8 - 6's6" l" - -
PBM.80 2.6.7 - 12', 9" - - -
I - OldBt"-.,1 ,-A"r"l*nrarrl-Black&Brass.6-1'",.1.-,7-15lishcdBlass,8-Adt,bc&Brrss; S'rlid Br'r'i
Glass: Cleal llelclled
"Slotted chirnnel top is srandarcl on tiris Vcrdc mociel. Spinning top rs
PBM.60 r, 2, l, 6, 7, 8 - 6" ,t'l:', - -
standarcl .rn all other nrittlcls.ET
HqitrREL
-"
b
FLUORESGENT A I]UCANDESCE]UT
REGESSED STEP 8 WALL LIGHTS
DESGEIPTIOI\I:
Th€se recessod Step and Wall Lights otfer a seleclion of sizes and
mounting characteristics thal will satisry almost every installation
exc€pt type lC and typg Non-lc. Units are availble in either cast
aluminum or bronze with stainless steel fasteners. Fixtures are
completely weatherproof with n€oprene gasket and difttsed,
tempered lens. Sev€ral models available with 45' cut-off, cast louver.
OnE 3/4" NPT tapped Entranc€ hub at each end standard, 1/2' NPT
and altemate entranc€ hub locations, avaibble on special order.
SPEGIFIGATIONS:
CONSTRUCTION: Fixture cast aluminum or cast bronze.
FINISH: Natural aluminum or natural bronze, aluminum body
permabaned.
LENS: Diffused, t€mp€red glass for non-louvored clear, tempered
glass for louver€d.
SOCKET: lncandesc€nt: medium screw base, Fluorescent: G23
(7 and I Wau), G)e3 (13 Watt).
REFLECTOR: Flat polished stainless steel.
EIITRANCE: 3/4" NPT at ends standard. 12" NPT available.
LAilP AY OTHERS.
TYPE
MODEL NUMEER:
SEE BACK FOR ORDER]NG GUIDE
NOTE: HYDREL RESERI/ES THE RIGHT TO CllAt{GE
ANY SPECIFICATION WTHOUT NOTICE.
Any dlmsnsion oo this sh6€t b to bs assJ|n€d a a t€f€rBnc€ dimenlion:
'Us€d for infodnation prlpGes only, lt does not govdn mandsctJring or
insp€don r€quil€fil€nts.' (ANSI Yl4.$1973)
4452 SERIES
U.L. LISTED
FOR WET LOCATIOI{S
c.s.A. USTED
'&Jfi'---*l
DIMENSIOilS:
1 t/8',
(2e)
2 114"
(57)
HYDREL b E rEgblored t6d.na* ot Llthonla Llglrllng
trI37t8',
(es)
4r'.53
o
o
o
o
o
o
lat8l BBADIEY AVEIIUE, AYL An, CALIFORiIIA 9134e . PHO E: 818/382-3485 . FAX: 818/369-3l{8
HYDREL STANDARD DATA SHEETS\LTG.44 3I2OOO
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Deparbnent of Community Development
75 Sorlh Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
telt 97 0.479.2139 Jax: 97 0.47 9.2452
web: www.ci,vail.co.us
Project Name: Exterior alteration to Building I DRB Number: DR8020085
Proiect Description:
Changes to approved plans; Bldg 1 interior remodel and ext facelift; Bldg 2 entry vesUbule;
wood siding & stucco at ballroom & appeal of witches hats denial
Participants;
OWNER HMC ACQUISITION PROPERTIES 104109/2@2 Phone:
c/o MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
ONE MARRIOTT DR DEPT 938.01
WASHINGTON DC 20058
License:
APPUCANT Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Archi}4lo9l2002 Phone: 476-1147
Henry Pratt
1000 Frontage Rd West
Vail, CO 81657
License:
Project Address: 715 W LIONSHEAD CR VAIL Location:
Legal Description: Lot: C&D Block: Subdivision: MORCUS SUB,
Parcel l{umber: 210107207001
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACrION
Motlon By: Woldrich Action: APPROVED
Second By: Pierce
Vote: 5-0 Dateof Apprcvalz 07llLl2o02
GondiUons:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consuh with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Pald: $25O.OO
TOfi'Nffi
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax:. 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co,us
DRB Numben DR801fi16Proiect Name: Marriott Redevelopment Phase II
Project DescripUon:
Exterior modifications to Building 2
Pafticipants:
OWNER HMC ACQUISmON PROPERTIES 112118/2001 Phone:
C/O MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
ONE MARRIOTT DR DEPT 938.01
WASHINGTON DC 20058
License:
APPUCANT Gwathmey Pratt Schultz Archil2/18/2001 Phone: 476-LI47
Henry Pratt
1000 Frontage Rd West
Vail, CO 81657
License:
Project Addrcss: 715 W UONSHEAD CR VAIL Loca6on:
Legal Description: Lot: C&D Block Subdivision: MORCUS SUB.
Parcel Number: 210107207001
Comments: SeeConditions
BOARI'/STAFF ACTION
Motion By:
Second By:
Vote!
CondlUons:
Pierce
Wddrich
4-0-1(Blumetti)
ActioN: APPROVED
Date of ApploYal;, 0310612002
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not consUtute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Cond: CON0005201
That the developer posts a surety bond with the Town of Vail to financially
guarantee the required off-site streetscape improvements in th eamount of 15006 of an
approved contractor's estimated bid. The boundary of the streetscape impro\remenB
shall be on the south edge of West Lionshead Circle from the loading dock location
on the east to the entrance to the parking structure on the west. The improvements
shall be depicted on a civil set of drawing prepatred by the developerand reviewed
and approved by the Town of Vail. The improvements shall include, but not be limited
to, .on.*ttit pavers, an operable snowmelt system, t tignting uno
furnishings, landscaping and the replacement of the curb/gutter, The bond shall be
approved and in place with the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the Phase II improvements.
Cond: CON0005202
That the dweloper revises the March 1, 2002, Design Review Board submitbal plans to
depict the changes required by the Design Review Board. The required changes shall
include the removal of the "witches haf' dormer (typ.), the addition of scissor
trusses to the level five dormers (typ.), a deeper "eye brow" roof (30" min) at
levels four and five (typ,), the addition of a skirting band at the base of the on
the north end ofthe Phase U wing, and add a second accent color around the 4" deep
window reveals on the tower. These revisions shall be reviewed and approved S the
Town prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Cond: CON0005203
That the developer returns to the Design Rerriew Board for final approval of the
window shutter design. The propoeed design shall include a "mock-up" ofthe design
installed on site. This approval shall occur prior to the install of the shutters.
Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Paid: $2O.OO
,'ff![
c&pyDESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, March 6, 2002
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
PUBLIC WELCOME
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department
= Discuss members terms and re-appointments
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERSABSENT
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce
Hans Woldrich
Andy Blumetti
Charles Acevedo
SITE VISITS
1. Potato Patch Club Condos - 950 Red Sandstone Rd.2. Robins residence - 154 Beaver Dam Rd.3. The Club - 304 Bridge Street4. Edelweiss - 103 Willow Place5. Yail21 -492E. Lionshead Circle6. Landmark - 610 S. Frontage Rd.7. Marriott - 715 W. Lionshead Circle
Driver: Bill
12:00 pm
2:00 pm
PUBLIG HEARING - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm
1. Specialty Sports DRB02-O032. Bill
Final review of a proposed sign.
492 E. Lionshead Circle (Vail 21 Bldg.)/Part of Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1" Filing
Applicant: Specialty Sports
MOTION: Charles Acevedo SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0 (Pierce recused)
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the sign approval is contingent upon the approval of the associated exterior
changes to the building
2. Specialty Sports DRB02-0033. Bill
Final review of a proposed sign.
610 S. Frontage Road (Landmark Bldg.)/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rc Filing
Applicant: Specialty Sports
MOTION: Charles Acevedo SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0 (Pierce recused)
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
'1
1. That the sign approval is contingent upon the approval of the associated exterior
changes to the building.
3. Fermanis residence DRB01-0394. Bill
Final review of a proposed new single-family residence.
1 109 Sandstone Drive/Lot A-2(4), Block A, Lionsridge 1" Filing.
Applicant: John Fermanis, represented by Steve Riden
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND:Andy Blumetti VOTE:5-0
APPROVED WITH 3 CONDITIONS:
1. That a staging plan be distributed to the Indian Creek Townhome owners.
2. That an access easement across Lot 4 be dedicated along with any subdivision of
Lot 4.
3. That all the staff conditions be met prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. Cummings residence DRB02-0005. Bill
Final review of a new residence.
5135 Main Gore Drive/Lot27,Yail Meadows 1't Filing.
Applicant: Greg Cummings
MOTION:ClarkBrittain SECOND:BillPierce VOTE:5-0
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 20,2OO2
5. Potato Patch Club Condos DRB02-0038. Allison
Final review of proposed repaint, exterior improvements & re-roof.
950 Red Sandstone RoadA/ail Potato Patch.
Applicant: Potato Patch Club Condos, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce Architects.
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Andy Blumetti VOTE: 3-0 (Piece & Woldrich
recused)
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. Recommendation that a stone cap be used.
2. That a site plan of all walls be submitted.
6. Robins residence DRB02-0021. Allison
Final review of a proposed addition to secondary residence.
154 Beaver Dam Rd. tLot27, Block 7, Vail Village 1"t.
Applicant: Steve Riden Architect
MOTION:Clark Brittain SECOND:Andy Blumetti VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That all Public Works issues must be met.
7. The Club DRB02-0026. Bill
Conceptual review of proposed bank and financial institution (ATM).
304 Bridge StreeULot H, Block 5A, VailVillage 1"'Filing.
Applicant: Pete Mott
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
)
8. Edelweiss DRB02-0042.
Conceptual review of proposed exterior alteration.
103 Willow Place/Lot4, Block6, VailVillage 1't Filing.Applicant Rick Halterman
CONGEPTUAL - NO VOTE
9. Hagerman residence DRB02-0019. George
Final review of a new primary/secondary residence.
1794 S. Frontage Road/Lot 2, Vail Village West Filing No. 2.
Applicant: Philip & Jocelyn Hagerman
MOTION: Andy Blumetti SECOND: Clark Brittain VOTE: 4-1 (Pierce recused)
APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS:
1. That the developer receives final approval of proposed final site grading and bike path
grading prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. That the developer revises the plans to depict a reduction in the height of the south west
dormer to match the height of the main ridge line, increases the overhang depth of the
dormer over the garage, and eliminates the strips of wood siding at the window mullions.3. That the developer returns to the Design Review Board with a revised color board depicting
a second stucco color on the building prior to the issuance of a TCO.4. That the developer submits an "as-built" survey of the final grading around the south side of
the building verifying that no fill has been added to the 100 year floodplain and that the
building complies with the approved building height requirements, prior to the issuance of a
TCO.5. That the developer submits a signed and approved State Highway Access Permit to the
Town of Vail, prior to the issuance of a building permit.6. That the developer submits for final approval a copy of the resubdivision plat of Lots 2 & 3,
Vail Village West and that the plat is recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder's
Office, prior to the issuance of the building permit.
10. Marriott Vail Mountain Resort DRB01-0416. George
Final review of Phase ll lmprovements.
715 West Lionshead Circle/Lots C&D. Morcus Subdivision and Lots 4&7. Block 1
Vail Lionshead 3d Filing.
Applicant: Vail Resorts
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0 (Blumetti recused)
APPROVED WITH 3 GONDITIONS:
1. That the developer posts a surety bond with the Town of Vail to financially
guarantee the required off-site streetscape improvements in the amount of 150%
of an approved contractor's estimated bid. The boundary of the streetscape
improvements shall be on the south edge of West Lionshead Circle from the
loading dock location on the east to the entrance to the parking structure on the
west. The improvements shall be depicted on a civil set of drawing prepared by
the developer and reviewed and approved by the Town of Vail. The
improvements shall include, but not be limited to, concrete unit pavers, an
operable snowmelt system, street lighting and furnishings, landscaping and the
replacement of the curb/gutter. The bond shall be approved and in place with the
Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Phase ll
improvements.
Bitl
2. That the developer revises the March 1,2002, Design Review Board submittal
plans to depict the changes required by the Design Review Board. The required
changes shall include the removal of the "witches hat" dormer (typ.), the addition
of scissor trusses to the level five dormers (typ.), a deeper "eye brow" roof (30"
min) at levels four and five (typ.), the addition of a skirting band at the base of the
on the north end ofthe Phase ll wing, and add a second accent color around the
4" deep window reveals on the tower. These revisions shall be reviewed and
approved by the Town prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. That the developer returns to the Design Review Board for final approval of the
window shutter design. The proposed design shall include a "mock-up" of the
design installed on site. This approval shall occur prior to the install of the
shutters.
Staff Approvals
Futernick residence DRB01 -0368.
Interior remodel; 125 sq. ft. to both halves of duplex.
930 Fairway Drive/Lot 7A, Vail Village 10'n Filing.
Applicanl Morris & Miriam Futernick
Polar Bar DR802-0036.
Awning sign and window sign.
143 E.-Meldow Drive/Lot P, Block 5-D, VailVillage l"rFiling.
Applicant: Brian Jones
Allison
Allison
The applications'and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24-hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Vnrl RESoRTS DevELoPMENT CoMPANY
CoNsrRUcrroru DEPARTMENT
June l l, 2002
Mr. George Ruther
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
75 S. Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
RE: II
Release of Landscaplng Bond, Bldg. 3
Dear George,
On behalf of Vail Resorts Development Company and Vail Marriott, I am requesting the release
ofthe performance bond for the landscaping on the south side ofbuilding tbree ofthe Vail
Marriott. The landscaping, in accordance with Matthews & Associates drawing dated May 2,
2002, has been completed.
I would like to thank you in advance for your prornpt response to this matter.
Sincerely,
6'rrrr- illd
Bruce Wilcox-Proj ect Manager
Vail Resorts Development Company
cc: Jack Hunn
fi;;:
Vail Resorts Development Company. 13? Benchmark Road. Post Offce Box 959.Avon, Colorado 81620-0959. (970) 84!2350. fax (970) 845-2358 ' wr'w,snov.com
Vail ' Breckenridge . Keystoneo . Beaver Creeko . Bachelor Gulch" ' Arrowhead t,
l{:52 Fror0ll
Gilb€rt F, Mcl.Ieisb
303{39''322
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
303t3t3838
Gnrr.rsHaw & HannrNo
A PROFE :iS IONAL CORDOAATIONtxIlOnNEtS .AT l-f,.w
sutrE,36ff)WEIIS EAR('O OINTER
ITOO LINcoI^l' 5TR.EET
DENVER, @I.C|EADO 6ogos..t698
aE IEPEONE l3O9) €39.S8OOTE&tgoPr ER t3og, oeg.sBssE-!fll L xAurqo€orarxcB.^va^r.rtlrar-aala
Apnl 30,2p02
, vIA FAX-_(970) 47e-2452
T-ele P 00?/003 F-55r
gmcncish@grimshawharring.com
v.rww. gn-mshawharrin g com
5H nH tiil6o
A{isou Oakeg
Department of Comnrunity Development
Towu of Vail
t
Re: Town of Vail.p,.u.ifl Re$cw fo*9 - vair Marrion Mo,ntain Reson - Buirding r' Rcmodel - public Heariud Weancfar May t,2002
Dear Alltson: I
II'
I am-rrritiag to you of behatf of the vail Sh condominiurn Assqciarion (.vail Spa,)cnnceming final approvatr 9f rhe appticatiou for the proposed Building I remodel of-the l\,IarrioitHotel pending before rbe Vail Desip Rwiew Board(DitB).
.^ _ ^ .l 1T y]:*,T ts qfans. oate{ {rr-i] 2, 2002 prepared by Hcnry prart which were providcd
1,T::l '*"1 tiou nefy darcd April 9,z0ez which incruded a copv of the DRB apprication and
:tg-":TH:*eJ 41 the DRB is aware, thc primary conccrn of Vail spa regartling all of rhe
PloPosed exterior renovations to rhe hotel facility have centercd on tobnini modlficatioas.
ln:i!$tlnJlavg iuocatcd in previous conespondence regarding o*-pt"r"t of *re horel,srerrovaugn, Vail Spa is concerned witb obstuctions to visual connections ald established viewswhich it bas to the ski nountail- vail Spa will continuc to monitor, and objecr to any development
or. redwclopment proposals w{ich obstruct their exixing view" in a mannlr which is inconsistsntwtlf 3nntic,afle uderlyirrg zoning, including rhe absplute maximum trcig* limiurion, and otherpollclcs ad developpent standards expressed iuthezobing codeandrhe Lionshcad RedevelopmentMaster Plan (Qecembcr lS, l99g).llI' " Rc8'arding the specific application pendiog treforc the DRB, as noted abovg Vail Spa doesootobjecr to orc application-based ou tlre plaru oated apnl 2.2002. If any material ctranics aremadeto thenroRof dcsignfeatures, including the turreE orotherroofline e[emerrts, asrcpresentcd
TOWN OF VAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
wwwci.vail.co.us
Op?
4pn129,2002
Mr. Bruce Wilcox
Project Manager
Vail Resorts Development Company
P.O. Box 959
Avon. Colorado 81620-0959
Re: Marrioft Landscaping and Revegetation
Dear Bruce:
Thank you for meeting with me on Monday, April 29, to discuss Vail Resort's plans for landscaping and
rcvegetation on the constuction staging area on the south side of the Marriott Hotel
The purpose of my lener is to provide you with written documentation of your agreement for the work that
is to be completed. As we agreed, no grading work shall begia prior to the installation of erosion confiol
and silt fencing. The grading work shall only occur within the area disturbed by construction activity and
no new undisturbed areas will be affected. Further, a minimum of twelve, 12-22' tall spruce hees shall be
planted in the pennanently improved landscape area that is a minimum of 25 feet in width, as measured
from the south side of the hotel. Additionally, the first floor outdoor patios will be increased in size to 8' x
8' and foundation planthgs of hedge height shrubs shall be instatlled. All areas, including the area to be
planted with native grass seed, shall be watered with and automatic irrigation system.
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. You can reach me by telephone at (970) 376-
2675.
Sincerely,
n*r-Q,"tllt-
George Ruther, AICP
ChiefofPlanning
Town of Vail
{g *""r"uor "o
Gilbert F. McNeish
303-839-3722
Immediate Attention Requested
George Ruther, AICP
Chief of Planning
Department of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gntrqsrraw & Hennrr.rc
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNE'YS AT LA\tr
SUITE 3800
WELLS FARGO GENTER
17OO LINCOLN STREET
DENVER, OOLORADO 80203-4538
TELEPHONE (303) 8S9-3AOO
TELECOPTER (3O3) 439-9834
E.MAI L lrArLBox@GRr MsEAwrt,\RRtNe.coM
March 6, 2002
gmcneish@grimshawharing.com
www.grimshawharrin g. com
Via Facsimile 970-479-2452
Re:
Dear George:
Town of Vail Design Review Board - Marriott Vail Mountain Resort - DRB 02-0008
Public Hearing Wednesday, March 6,2002
I am writing to you on behalf the Vail Spa Condominium Association ("Vail Spa")
concerning the proposed exterior alterations to the Marriott Hotel pending before the Vail Design
Review Board ("DRB"), application entitled Marriott Vail Mountain Resort DRB 02-0008 - Final
Approval.
I have reviewed the revised plans dated March l, 2002 prepared by Henry Pratt which you
provided to me. As you and the DRB are aware, the primary concem of Vail Spa regarding the
proposed exterior renovations of the hotel have centered on roof line modifications. Specifically,
Vail Spa is concerned with obstructions to visual connections and established views which it has to
the ski mountain. Vail Spa will continue to monitor and object to any development or
redevelopment proposals which obstruct their existing views in a manner which is inconsistent with
the absolute maximum height limitation, and other policies and development standards expressed
in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan (December 15, 1998).
Regarding the specific application pending before the DRB, Vail Spa does not object to the
application based on the revised plans dated March 1,2002 as noted above. If changes are made to
any ofthe design features, including the turrets or other roof line elements, as represented on the
George Ruther
March6,2002
Page2
March 1 plans, Vail Spa reserves its right to make an objection to such changes and/or appeal the
DRB decision, if necessary.
Based on the position taken by Vail Spa conceming this application as described above, I do
not plan to be present at the DRB hearing today conceming this matter. If a final decision is made
by the DRB, please forward to me a copy of the appropriate DRB documents which confirm the
action taken by the Board with respect to this application. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
GRIMSHAW & HARRING,
A Professional CorporationI A--- .
fdfr't'W
Gilbert F. McNeish
cc: Design Review Board Members
Al and Lorna Hauser (970) 476-5548
Alex Iskerderian, General Counsel, Vail Resorts Development Company
(via facsimile 97 0-845 -255 5)
Henry Pratt (970) 476-1612
Cl13 I 53\I\IETIERS\Lruthcr 3-0,6.02.wod
I0l4ft,ffi
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557
te/:, 970.479.21n ftx: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Marriott Redevelopment Phase II DRB Number: DR8010416
Project Description:
Exterior modifications to Building 2
Participants:
OWNER HMC ACQUISmON PROPERTIES 112118/2001 Phone:
C/O MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
ONE MARRIOTT DR DEPT 938.01
WASHINGTON DC 20058
License:
APPUCANT Gwathmey Pratt SchulE Archi12/18/2001 Phone: 476-LL47
Henry Pratt
1000 Frontage Rd West
Vail, CO 81557
License:
Project Address: 715 W UONSHEAD CR VAIL Location:
Legal Descriptaon: Lots C&D Block Subdivision: MORCUS SUB.
Parcef Number= 2LQLO7207O0L
Comments: SeeConditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTIOI{
MoUon By: Pierce Actaon: APPROVED
Second By: Woldrich
Vote: 4-0-1 (Blumetti) Date of Approvalz 0310612002
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond:0
(P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities'
Cond: CON0005201
That the developer posts a surety bond with the Town of Vail to financially
guarantee the required off-site streetscape improvements in th eamount of 150o/o of an
approved contractor's estimated bid. The boundary of the streetscape improvements
shall be on the south edge of West Lionshead Circle from the loading dock location
on the east to the entrance to the parking structure on the west. The improvements
shall be depicted on a civil set of drawing prepatred by the developerand reviewed
and approved by the Town of Vail. The improvements shall include, but not be limited
,o, .on.r"tlnit pavers, an operable snowmelt rrr,"r,?ee, lighung and
furnishings, landscaping and the replacement ofthe curb/gutter. The bond shall be
approved and in place with the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the Phase II improvements.
Cond: CON0005202
That the developer revises the March 1, 2002, Design Review Board submittal plans to
depict the changes required by the Design Review Board. The required changes shall
include the removal of the "witches hat" dormer (typ.), the addition of scissor
trusses to the level five dormers (typ.), a deeper "eye brow" roof (30' min) at
levels four and fle (typ.), the addition of a skirting band at the base of the on
the north end of the Phase II wing, and add a second accent color around the 4" deep
window reveals on the tower. These revisions shall be reviewed and approved by the
Town prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Cond: CON0005203
That the developer returns to the Design Review Board for final approval of the
window shutter design. The proposed design shall include a "mock-up" of the design
installed on site. This approval shall occur prior to the install of the shutters.
Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Paid: $2O.OO
March 1, 2OO2
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development D6partm6nt
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Maniott Mountain Resort
Phase 2 remodel
Dear George,
As requested, here are the latest full-size drawings for the Building 2 remodel at the Vail
Marriott. The drawings will continue to evolve so the set we present on Wednesday may be
slightly different as we move forward in the design and detailing process.
We are seeking final approval on Wednesday for the bulk of Building 2. Even though the
ffoor plans for the 76 floor condominiums are not yet fixed, we are presenting the
fenestration for final approval on the 6th.
Based on comments from the DRB in the February 6h meeting, these plans reflect the
following revisions:
1. In response to Charlie's request to look at the truss design in the top floor gables,
we have changed the shape from simple king-post to a scissor design. (The
client's representative vetoed an arched truss chord.) This shape does a better
job of working with the arch-top windows. Similar shapes are used in the new
truss designs for the porte cochere.2. The DRB's concern that the design for the porte cochere did not match well with
the rest of the architecture is well taken. We have taken the steps listed below
to address this concern. These steps should give the Porte Cochere (PCl the
detail and grandeur recommended by the DRB and should tie it to the building
better than the previous design:
George Ruther- March 1 , 2OO2
Page 2
3.
4.
5.
a. We have added a street-facing gable dormer that is on the hotel entry axis
which will also serve as shelter for the bus stop. This dormer will have
stone columns and a scissor truss design with timber kickers similar to those
proposed higher up on Building 2. This dormer will continue out the south
side or the driveway roof and connect to the rest of the PC roof.
b. We have modified the PC trusses to a hammer- beam type timber truss with
kickers. This type of truss inherently has more visual interest than the
simple trusses previously proposed.
c. The existing stone columns will be removed since they are spaced too close
to the center. New stone support columns, located a bit further apart will
be constructed.
d. Unless my engineer balks, we hope to have eliminated any wrapped steel
beams that were necessary before. All the materials visible in this design
for the PC should be timber, wood or stone.
Gas appliance fireplaces have recently been added at the 66 and 7th floors.
These (and all other gas terminationsl will be painted to match the surrounding
wall material and have been organized and aligned on the exterior elevation,
We are providing a site plan based on a survey done last summer. This site plan
does show the proposed porte cochere.
We are providing a roof plan. Elevations of the turrets are shown on the west
elevation however since that is an easier place to make the comparison, We
have also shown the elevations of the previously approved roof elements on the
west elevation,
The area of the individual condominiums has been increased since the last DRB
meeting but the total remains well below that approved in 1999. Total approved
area in 1999 was 7668 SF. At the 6s floor, the area has increased from 1673
SF to approximately 2205; at the 7'h floor, the area has increased to
approximately 5000 SF for a total of approximately 7205 SF (we can give you
the exact total when the plans are finalized). To accommodate this increased
area we are now showing dormers at the 6'h floor condominium which extend
out onto the south deck presented at the last meeting. We have also extended
the 7th floor south-facing dormers out an additional 6 feet and modified the
dormer roofs slightly (lower elevation at the eaves). The extension of the 7'n
floor south dormers allows us to add more windows on east and west elevations,
We are showing that a set of non functioning steps and doors at the north end of
building 2 are proposed to be removed and the existing stone veneer patched.
This will give us room to possibly add landscaping and/or benches. We would
ask that this discussion (and all site landscaping improvements) be part of the
Building 1 approval (coming as soon as we get 82 permitted and under
construction). The Owner will bond any landscaping until that time if necessary.
As discussed last Tuesday and agreed by you, the loading dock improvements
will be part of the Building 1 approval. This is due to the fact that it will be used
for loading access for the Hotel during 82 construction. In any case, we do not
propose to alter the approved design for this area.
6.
7.
8.
George Ruther- March 1 ,2OO2
Page 3
We have NOT altered the 7'n floor "witches hats" dormers. lt was our impression
that we satisfied Hans's concerns during the discussion on February 6s. We
continue to feel that a double width dormer is not really suitable at the top floor
level and is therefore less appealing than the single units. There is little we can
do to alter the spacing due to existing hotel room layouts.
As we discussed on Tuesday, the north side heated sidewalk required in the
approval 2 years ago will be tied to the building permit for the Building 1 remodel.
You also agreed that the extent of the sidewalk can be revised to run only from
the drive west of Building 3 around to the Antlers property line. This is due to
the fact that the plans for the West Day lot are being developed at this time and
it would be a tremendous waste to build the sidewalk extension westward from
Buiding 3 if it will get torn up in the Spring of 2003.
Finally, the finish on the balcony and French railings is being proposed to match
that on Building 3. All other materials and colors are as previously discussed.
The schedule for construction for Buildings 2 and 1 is even tighter than that for Building 3.
We need final DRB approval for Building 2 next Wednesday. We can accept conditions
attached to the approval that might require us to return for final review of the condo
fenestration or other very minor issues. Given the minor nature of the suggestions and
comment at the previous two meetings. we hope that this will not be necessary
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY PRATT
9.
10.
11.
Henry R. Pratt,AIA
oflfrr Frn-oRl sH nH Ri
o
30$3e$il
-t^--Gnrrrsxntrr dL IIARRING
A Pnott ssloN^l. ooRFOnATtOl
tf,roRN!5rli aT LAw
surrE 3000arrr!.s ErRco GENTER
17trc r.lN@r.lf sTruErDllf v!8, @roBArx) €oeo3'4E94
TrrrPIOlrE {aO3) &ig€€OO
TEr,EootrER (gooD o{t9-9038
E -xAI L t^rlao!€cttrlr.rvtl^lFlrccpr
I
T-sa.2 P.00tn0t F-t 7l
t
gocncish@grinshawharring;com
www, grimshrrrh*ringcom
I
I
I
Vh Facsimile 970-4?9-245i1
Gilb€nf. McNeirh
305.85e.tru
February 25,2002
Qeorge Ruthcr, AICP
Chie-f of Plpnning
Depirup4i of Community DevdopneDt
Townof Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 |
Re: Mafiiotn HoEl - Design Revicw Board - Hearing Date of March 6,20V2
Dear Gb,rgs: I
,l
Bascd on oru telephone convcrsation last wee\ it is my rmderstancling thal the F)esign
Review Board hearing scheduted for February 20, 2002 cimcerping thc Manion Hotcl pro$al wns
tbbled and rescheduled for March 6,2002. | -
I
In our pr€vious communications, you have providcd to m9 I copy of the application and
dmwings as well as corresponderrce between you and Henry hatt throqh February I 3, 2002. In my
prcparation for the DRB heaing schcduled for March 6'r',
followiug:
expncss mail to mc copies of rhe
I
In addition, whcn you and t rn& on February '6* prl.or ro the DRB concePtual desigR rcvicw,
I proviited to you a copy of a letter from me to you dated April I 8, 2001 curceming condirions of
approval to tbe prwious tvfarriort Hotel applicadon. Ar that rimc, you will recall fiat Hosr Marion,
.
:!
{r
\
I
l
l.
2.
3.
4.
n
^'-UoP1.t-''
^()vU-
0e-25-0?04:54n FrorGll 30383t3838 P.003/001 F-rrl
Oeorge Ruther
Febtuary 25,2002
Phgc 2
as owner at that timq agreed to the imposition of rhe conditions set forttr in my letter as Pafl of tbc
DRB approval-
My rccords indicate that *rese conditions indeed were imposed by the DRB as condirions of
approval to thc lvlarriott octerior atrcration. Notwithstanding rhe peoding aplication to amcnd the
prcviousty approved plaru, it is my belief rhat $e conditions of approval remain in full force and
effe$t. Horryever, bccarse these coaditions continue to be important for The Vail Spa Condominium
Associ*ioq I want to confimt that my tmderstaDdirg is correct.
IhavedissusscdrhisrnatterwithHenrylratt. Heinitiallyinformedmebywrinenc{mnent
dated January 3 l, 2002 in a lener oftransmittal with various application materials rhd 'We continuc
to abide by tbs agfecmcnt not tO have lighling, pcnnants, gnt€nnse, etc." In a follow up discussion
I had recently with Henry, I requested that he confirm this understaoding with Vail Resorts. As I
indicated abqvq even though I believe the conditions are still in force, be,cause the,g:n$1n8
applicationis frourVaiI Resorts, a new ownership entity for the borcLm
Henry has indiceted that he will seek a coalirnarion fronr Rcsorts and I hopc to
elerneut of the application rcsolved by the end of this week prior to noct week's DllB r*
I sppreciat€ yorrr attenrion to the matcrials udich I haw requcsted end thank you in
for your assistance.
Very tnrly yours,
AI and Loma Harrscr (970) 47G5548
l{enry Pran (970) 476-1612
I' c:\rllilrluETTERSlLrurhalarr!.25{D.wd
rst{Anlt RRlo
!
GRIMS}IAW& HARRING.
A Professional Comoration
ll _{Jfr).. ,
February 16,2OO2
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Marriott Mountain Resort
Phase 2 remodel
Dear George,
As requested, here are the latest full-size drawings for the Building 2 remodel at the Vail
Merriott. The drawings will continue to evolve so the set we present on Wednesday may be
slightly different as we move forward in the design and detailing process.
We are seeking final approval on Wednesday for the bulk of Building 2. As the floor plans
for the condominiums are not yet fixed, we will return to the DRB to discuss the impacts the
plans will have on the elevations. lf this is desired, we would ask that this be a condition of
approval for the balance of the building.
Based on comments from the DRB in the February 6th meeting, these plans reflect the
following revisions:
1. In response to Charlie's request to look at the truss design in the top floor gables,
we have changed the shape from simple king-post to a scissor design. (The
client's representative vetoed an arched truss chord.) This shape does a better
job of working with the arch-top windows.
2. The DRB's concern that the design for the porte cochere did not match well with
the rest of the architecture is well taken. We have taken the following steps to
address this concern (l need to confirm the design with my engineer so I do not
have very good documentation today):
a. We have added a street-facing gable dormer that is on the hotel entry axis
and will also serve as shelter for the bus stop. This dormer will have a
scissor truss design and timber kickers similar to those proposed higher up
on Building 2.
George Ruther- February 16,2OO2
Page 2
3.
4.
5.
b. We have modified the PC truss to a hammer- beam type timber truss with
kickers. This type of truss inherently has more visual interest than the
simple trusses previously proposed.
c. The existing stone columns will be removed since they are spaced too close
to the center. New stone and timber support columns, located a bit further
apart will be constructed. By using timber columns above a stone base and
the resulting need to brace the cross beams with timber kickers we will give
the porte cochere the increased visual interest desired by the DRB.
Gas appliance fireplaces have recently been added at the 6th and 7th floors.
These (and all other gas terminations) will be painted to match the surrounding
wall material and have been organized and aligned on the exterior elevation.
We are providing a site plan based on a survey done last summer. This site plan
does show the proposed Porte cochere.
We are providing a roof plan. Elevations of the turrets are shown on the west
elevation however since that is an easier place to make the comparison. We
have also shown the elevations of the previously approved roof elements on the
west elevation.
The area of the condominiums has been increased since the last DRB meeting but
the total remains well below that approved in 1999. At the 6s floor, the area
has increased from 1673 SF to 2230; at the 7th floor, the area has increased to
approximately 48OO for a total of approximately 7O3O SF (we will have the total
when the plans are finalized). Total approved area in 1999 was 7668 SF. To
accommodate this increased area we are now showing dormers at the 66 floor
condominium which extend out onto the south deck presented at the last
meeting. we have also extended the 7th floor south-facing dormers out an
additional 6 feet and modified the dormer roofs slightly (larger overhangs at the
eaves).
We are showing that a set of non functioning steps and doors at the north end of
building 2 are proposed to be removed and the existing stone veneer patched.
This will give us room to possibly add landscaping and/or benches. We would
ask that this discussion (and all site landscaping improvementsl be part of the
Building 1 approval (coming as soon as we get 82 permitted and under
construction), The Owner will bond any landscaping until that time if necessary.
We also ask that the loading dock be part of the Building 1 approval due to the
fact that it will be the only loading access for the Hotel during 82 construction.
In any case, we do not propose to alter the approved design for this area.
We have NOT altered the 7th floor "witches hats" dormers. lt was our impression
that we satisfied Hans's concerns during the discussion on February 6'n. We
continue to feel that a double width dormer is less appealing than the single
units. There is little we can do to alter the spacing due to existing hotel room
layouts.
6.
7.
8.
9.
George Ruther- February '16,2OO2
Page 3
10. With regard to the north side heated sidewalk required in the approval 2 years
ago, we would ask that its construction be tied to the building permit for the
Building 1 remodel. We would also ask that the scope of the sidewalk be revised
(for nowl to run only from the drive west of Building 3 around to the Antlers
property line. The plans for the West Day lot are being developed at this time
and it would be a tremendous waste to build the sidewalk extension westward
from Buiding 3 if it will get torn up in the Spring of 2003.
1 1. Finally, the finish on the balcony and French railings is being proposed to match
that on Building 3. All other materials and colors are as previously discussed.
The schedule for construction for Buildings 2 and 1 is even tighter than that for Building 3.
We need final DRB approval on the 20s for Building 2. We can accept at that time
conditions attached to the approval that might require us to return for final review of
condominium fenestration or other minor issues. Given the minor nature of the suggestions
and comment at the last meeting, we hope this will not be an unreasonable request.
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY PRATT S
/-/
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2I38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
Febnrary 13,2002
Mr. Henry Pratt
Qvathmsy, Pratt, Schulu Architects. Inc.
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Vail Manioft Mountain Resort - Design Review Board Comments -2/6102
DearHenry:.
Thank you for appearing before the Town ofVail Desip Review Board for a conceptual review of the
proposed Phase II improvements to the Vail Marriot Mountain Resort.
The purpose of ny letter is to provide you with written docrmentation of the comments provided by the
Desip Review Board. The following is a list of the comments:
D A more substantial porte cochere must be created to improve the sense of arrival for the guests and to
create a front entrance that is compatible with the rest of the hotel design. The Board offered the
zuggestions, " ...it should laock your soclcs of, ...dentl the entry with stone and heavy timbers to
create an alpine feel. " Special attention shall be given to Section 8.4.2.5 of the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan.
o The exterior building material used on the elevator override room should be a material that "mal<es the
room go away" and should not be a material that draws attention to that portion of the hotel. The
Board was agreeable to the proposed dark colored asphalt shingles. The Lionshead Redevelopment
Master Plan states, " ...rooftop equipment within the flat areas shall be painted to blend with the roof
material. "
o The Board was in favor of the proposed turet features. The reduction in heigbt and mass from the
1999 approval was well received and deemed appropriate given the goals outlined in the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan (Section 8.3.4.2).
o The loading dock area shall be addressed in this phase of the project. Pursuant to Sections 6.8.1 and
6.8.2 of the master plan, service docks and loading delivery areas shall be visually screened from
surrounding areas and all dumpster and outdoor trash areas should be completely screened and
enclosed. The Board cited the Vail Mountain Lodge as having an excellent example ofan approved
screening gate. Please refer to Section 6.8.2 for specific criteria and requirementS.
o The Board recommended that an alternate design to the'\ritches hat" donners be presented for review
and consideration. See Section 8.4.2.7 of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan for details.
o The gas fireplace vents must be aligned in an orderly fashion on the exterior of the building.
I
EECYCLED PAPEN$
o The shutter design is an excellent detail. Please refer to Section 8.4.2.9 of the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan for further explanation.
o The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan identifies the sidewalk along the south side of West
Lionshead Circle as a secondary pedestrian walkway. As suc\ this walkway needs to be improved
and enhanced with this phase of construction. The Board was agreeable to only requiring that the
sidewalk be constructed from the loading dock area to the entrance down to the parking structure
located to the wet of the hotel. Future sidewalk improved will be required as future phases are
completed.
o Please provide a site plan and landscape plan for the Phase II improvements indicating all the
necessary information as required on the DRB application form.
tr Please provide a roofplan showing existing and proposed roofridge elevations. The plan should also
compare the current proposal to the 1999 approval. This infonnation will aid in the review and
consideration of the proposal.
Should you have any questions or concems with regard to the information addressed in this lefter, please do
not hesitate to call. You can reach me by telephone
^t
(970) 479-2145.
Sincerely,
H*r-?'*'^o
George Ruther, AICP
Chief of Planning
Town of Vail
Xc: Mr. Gil McNeish
Town of Vail Design Review Board
|ll
^f-v
ti Irratn;rtr Htn= t 44*,.ltt
1'.,Ha,1 r,A.,rtlie-. ekage. h, ?fo,s sr'ute. t4 Vl
, ,R.,v tlhe_Iee;*t_ 3
r \l.. V*.1 5[e[ - obare.,ro-rio, oo V,'t*o
.. yn*<iullhe;1hr
;., F hAthr rliot,+tio.r-* - C^ 'o'ar"l
,ri
:: ClAala.. '[?aui:l;+ {lrb L
X* eean+e * wog|e oara**c- R* f*n al 14€
fute qctpeE
)F hlrePee oll il6 lor.rg rls r.r-.. il.rr p€rAa€.
;,4"" 1tl
frrrnt- ?eviev-t t-errrR
-
Application for Design Review
Departnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, VaiL Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General Information:
This. application. b br any project requiring Design Review approval. Any project requiring design review must
receive. approval prior b subrnitring a building permit application. Please reEr to the submittal requirements br theparticuhr apprwal that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required
infofination is recgived by the community Development Departnint. The project may also rieea to ue reviewed bythe Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental aommission. oesiin neview Board approval lapsei
unless a building permit is issued and construction commences within one year of the approval.
Location of the Proposaf r rot,lF Block: I Subdivision:
Parcel No.:rOl0 ))t
Name(s) of (hvner(s):
Mailing Address:
Ourner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
For consfuction of a new building or dano/rebuild.
For an addition where square botage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversiors).
For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenq such as,
rerooflng, painting, wirdow additionE landscaping, Ences and
retaining walls, etr.
$20 For rwisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Re^/iew Board
Type of Review and Fee:
tr New ConstructionD Additbn
tr Minor Alteration
$200
$s0
i20
{ Cnungo to Approved Plans
PLEASE SUBMIT THrS APPUCATION, ALL LJBMITTAL REQTJTREMENTS
AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657.,\'W
Sont By: DEc t4'ot eBtzTArl c0r.{s.Ir70 470 1612;D3c-13-0.l 16:53;V n PLrAI'{O
Application for Design Revieur
ryafirert of Cdnmunitv frq\drynqn
75 sq.d| FE|rbge Ro.4 vef, CbFe& 01di7
B: 92t.479,213. fd,: 970.4'n2{F,2
urcb: wf ,cr.ciYal.ca ul
#SIjHT*S ** rrrsrrfis DEden ncvicr rpproyc. fty Flcrt reflihg rErJn Gvbr., m.6t
IldF appot€l trior b ctnittu a ulldlno F|rtF aplc'ttn. pl€sse |lftr b lle camlual t€qtiEflteft e 0te'
pffirbr aFploal trat b quested An ilIdon |b Dedgn nsiry canlpt bc dqcd until al tqtted
lnfurnattrn b rccdwd by lhc c{rttttrrnfty Hrf|cnt DtputrE rt Ittc pmi:ct mry .bo tr!!d b bc tcvtwcC UY
tlre Tovn Canlcil ilyr tt PlannlnE anO Ewltunnural Coffiriss![L DaJgr Rrvir* lerrd rppraual l4s
unlo r brildiry pmrit b irurd rrrd cenrtrndcn Eecrrncts uiU*r orc ytrr ef tfe lDprwd.
Loation of tlte ProposaE Lc-tsloclt:- Subdivisbn:
Plrysr'al Address:
Itrcd l|s!(Cmbct Easle Co. Assesor at 97D32&8640 lt* parcd no) '
Zonlng:
!lam{s) sf ourne(s);
MtilingAddrcc6:e,6.
Orne(r)
Hame of
Mailing
P.Llr 212
I
t
WpG of Rcvicuand Fcci
O iler' Cfisfrrcrpntr Addel
tr tthdAltFration
t200
+s0
$20
Fr constudin of . nery BrlwE or OcmofrcUn
Fr ana(Ution whrnsq.rrc hobqc b add b ary.tdfitl5l or
ffirgciJ bui|.|i{ (hcld€i 250.ddti'ls & llerb @drqsbE). '
Fc mlEr clrrges to btdfiF atd CE 'rnprovsnsc, $dl G
. r€rofing pahetg,.wfodou additiorur lanGcaplng frnG .nd
-y( o,unoes b Amrovctl HaE
. rEtilllg lnlts rtr
t20 fu cvisirm b ptarE aFldy +trot€d Uy ffamhe Snilf r tlt
DgHI nariil Eoard
ru SE SIJ0HITTHIS IPPUCIToN,'flf $r8],{fTA. RqJIREI.lErfS
IND TIIE FEE TO THE OTART}IEf{Ttr CO!,I1'IUIITd OA'AOPN'IE1I|T,
75 g.m noilr 6E R(uo, vAn, co.oRAoo 8155r.
Application for Design Review
Deparbnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970,479,2139 faxi 970.479.2452
web: www,ci,\rail.co.us
General Inbrmadon:
This application is for any prcject requiring Design Review apprwal. Any project requiring design review must
recei\re approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the
particlllar approral that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be aacepted until all required
information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be revlewed by
the Tourn Council ard/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Declgn Reuir:w Board apprwrl bpece
unter a bulldlng pcrmlt ir iscued and colntnrcdon conrmenec wittin orc year of the approval.
Deccrlpdon of tlre Request:INTe,'OR ANb tntTEnlog R6|./\ODfI. OF E^'ILDIUET
2G
Locdon of the Fropocal: Lot:_Block:_ Subdivision:
rnPFtra
TATET.
Phydcal Addrcse:
Palel ilo.:(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-86'10 for parcel no.)
Zonlng:6DD *1
l{ane(s) otourner(s):'l^* Ar*rru 4o VA'L R:rers
l,lalllng Addrcss:
Phone:
Owner(s)
Name of
l.lalllng Addrcss:
Phoner
For @nsfruction of a new building or demo/rebuild.
For an addition where square footage is added to any reCdential or
ommerchl building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes to buiHings and site improrements, sudt as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, hndscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
/ ctrangestoApprored Plans $20 For revisions to plans already apprwed by Planning Staff or the
fYpe of Revleu and Fee:
D New Construction $200tr Addition $50
tr Minor Alteration $20
Design Review Board - Att
pLEAsE suBMrrrHrs AprucAnoN, ALL suBMrrrAL REeurREMENrs
(0 4 a 4t 6)
AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTT'4ENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
FolO'mce Ueo Only!
Fee Pald: Check No.:- By:
03 -0cO
UST OF PROPOSED MATERIAo
BUILDING MATERIALS:
Roof
sElng
Other Wall Materbls
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
DoorTrim
Hand or Deck Raib
Flues
Flashing
Chimne'6
Tnsh Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
ErGerior Lighting
Other
rOP:r>rdQ b-"l.@
2.ElF€r.l}J\rFre- w\r.L
ll rrEIFS Flce [^!0b
lvhiltrl EtFg rroDbwE-i--DFlvrT tpL
h4|f,u{ P}\. s
f'lriT[$ FlF5 Ur0b
E?GrLE '\9lf,trE n
FIA]U{ fi. 3
Hxrtr+ A\. 3
MtTcH ldlrrDods
R\ttl)f DK 44|cl
l.,tNcrt @oF 0" r.i.rAtl-
TYPE OF MATERI,AL: COLORI
1. fPrraAe\l FoFE: qeAilb w1ANoR tAA\lG{-F:
Z. €^.1ALL TveP€T: ZAPro\l€ CrPp€?-: l'lAr\rRAL
?. LAeCr€ TVCT4ET :4earnb MA^log gRAtlCrLE :
C.€}4€|.T BOAFD,
AL\,h CLAD
ElFa "fttrg lrDoDtr
Auvvn Crns
tl riaf6 FAv€ w00D
t"-
BlslUCr
4?tr rqTu
NA
NA
NA
llA
* Pleas€ specify tie manufacturer=s color, number and attach a small color chip
** All efterior lighting must nEet the Town=s Lightirg Ordinance 12-11-5J. If ocerior lightng b propced,
please indicate the number of fxtures and locations on a separat€ lightjng plan. Identiff each ft<ture type
and provide the height above grade, lumens oupuE luminous area, and attach a cut sheet of the lighting
futures.
l.lo Lr.usee-?tfrNe A? ?APT oF Tthg fu?o=*t-'
Rsre C.oc*e-€ MlretrftL6 t-lraf ftp5 Dg^e,qr t0\tr+ m F\Lt-oaJ.
(xo crv.^rq€e -TD foffi wqffi-E Farw\ APPpouEt DF9lc7J ) .
ot
T??t -,+.2@L
PROPO1ED NORTH ELEVATION
1CALE, Vtb" = l'-O"
tO
I ffi???
fiiE-r-
YEnt?-
YEEE-
PROPOSED 1OUTH ELEVATION
I'l+'1nZ
5CALE, \o' - l'-O'
Sent By: Gxrathm€y Pratt Schultzthj.tecT;970 476 1612i
January 2,2OOz
utl-z-oz'tzz+z;Page 213
George Ruther '
town of Vail Community Devglopmont Department
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Maniott Mountain Resort
Pharc 2 remodel
\
Dear George. I
,
As a follow-up to ouf discussion this morning on whether the Marriott Building 2 remodel
quafifies as an Exterior Alteration under section 12-7H-7 | would ask that you consider the
fpllowing.
t
1, Regardless of whether or not sDD #7 was voided or superceded by the adoption of
the LMU-1 zoning distfict for this bropeny. w€ do have a proieA spproval curently
in effect. fne scipe df our. p-poi4 ior Building 2 land subsequontly Building 1) is
substantially similar tdtrratbpproved for SDD #7 in 1999'
2. We aro not proposing [o aOl any accommodation units, fractaonal fse club units,
time.share units or more than lOOO SF of common space or commercial space as
listed in ParagraPh A ot 12-7H-7. I
3. While the proposed remodel does change the use of the existing 'windows-
rostourant space frorp restauranumeeting to dwelling rjrnit lps was previously
.proposod and approJed), the size and scope of the proposdd change is less than
wasapprovedin'SDD#7inJu|yot1999'There|orewearenotaddingdwe||ing
units but actually reducing bottrthe size and the number from what is approved in
SDD #7. \
4. off-site lmpscts are minimal. il not negatiye in effect relative to both existing and
: previously approved conditions, as the remodel proposes to replace the existing
1 iestaurant/meeting space with condominiums (big negative impact on parking and
' trafficl. we are pioposing ro remodel the hotel rooms and enlarge the bathrooms
butnochangesinkeycountarebeingproposedatthistim€.Aqain,thenet
changes to the building are less than was approved in 1999'
:: -'nt By: Gwathmey Pratt
George Buther- January 2,2OO2
Page 2
schurtz{litecr; s70 476 1612;Jan -2 -02 Page 3/3
would also like to point out that some of the exterior changes being proposed are
"ffi"*ed upon us by the Vail Building and Fire Departmonts; specifically-the
lqri*rffirpr"q alt wocd sioing with a non-combustible m_aterial._This
ffi ,;ilil;-pr;ffi r.:'"iqroiheMarriott"ll.':lo:::ll':::lt^.::o^o.T:o
Jittre eulHins'Code. To forciFilunitrqswner AND to follow ?t-::11n^.T"'
this has off-site ampacts seoms a U'rt neawlh-afrdedqrould set a dangerous
precedent for other buildings in the TOV (existing and
6.[d;-;;p;;-il;;";;it;"s ot approvat containd in sDD #7, most are rendered
moot by the fact that the Gore Creek Club is not currently being Proposed'
Howevir, I believe the owner is prepared to do the loading dock improvements and
sidewalk improvements concurent with the Building 1 work' il not before'
In light of the above, we would therefore ask that v_ou..{lassifv.this n^roiec_t as a modification
to a-pproveO plans- the plans approved in 1999 by OrdiAance #10' As we will be returning
with the Building 1 remodel later this spring, we would also ask that issues such as
t"nOr"apinS, toaOing dock and snowmdted sidewalks be addressed at that time'
Finalty, if you determine that the above arguments are not sufticient to avoid classification as
an Enerior Alteration. we would ask that iou waive the requiremont for shadow studies in
light of the fact that the proposed design has less height and mass tlan tle design approved
iri t SgS, for which we did submit shadow studies. lt was determined at that time that therc
were no significant shade/shadow issues.
Sincerely,
P.C.
l'(
Qt.{t
rtl<. 1\n l--ulol.C- |(, l-_i
l,i.t-.- . - l
ill$Ait 'rl
"a:-l \;\
'o- fiLo ,f ,-l{
$ '$ f-;-
Rii" ;i6 ;i1't. lr.
rft
,l l-] ,F
E_ , ig: t .rtFurt.=
tal /r |f!l=
E5: f 7. Jl
-I\-
-Z r-DE_ = TLn--h
l'
Ut,
)-'.-"Y
$t s--$_v f '.,"
$ ii t+*:1 $l
t i* i'
$t-
-Yl!1d
€
I
tu
:
IuI\)o
oz
AJ
f
u)
Izo
F
$luJ]
rul
FIollul<l
I
DIlulolol
rLlol
MI
lLl
It
a-
s-
Lo-:rl&
t at'.cat1iJ*
o
{.
sr
.b
b
o--.- - - , -r/+
>tt
).
o
$r
rtfttI
o----.-.
t&.€44*4
o---- -.- -.-.
o
t
'o8
lriJ
\tl
T
Izo
tr
luJtu
t'
1-r.j
oi
\s
uiJ
U)
tu
:lllIool
luo
$
tL
Izotr
$llulJIul
FIol
Aluoo
tLo
v.
IL
t
GI
n
ll
t aQe
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
utww.ci.vail-co.us
Ianuary 4,2002
Mr. Henry Pratt .
Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz Architects, P.C.
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657 Fax (970) 4'16-1612
Vail Marriott Mountain Resort/Remodel Phase 2
Dear Henry,
I received your letter dated Jatrua ry 2, 2002, regardng the development review process for the proposed
Vail Maniott Mountain Resort remodel of Phase 2.
The purpose of ny letter is to provide you with written documentation of the Town's position on the
development review process for tbe Marriott remodel. Upon deliberations with Town of Vail staff and a
review of the Vail Town Code, it has been determined that the remodel of the Vail Marriott Mountain
Resort, as proposed, is a change to previuosly approved plans (1999) that requires a review by the Town of
Vail Design Review Board but not by the Planning & Environmental Commission.
We have determined that the project is not a major exterior alteratioq as defined in the Vail Town Code.
The changes thel 31e plspssgd do not constitute a major exterior alteration or modification to the previously
approved plans since the proposed changes do not meet the criteria outlined for a major exterior alteration
or modification, as defmed in Section l2-7H-7 of the Vail Town Code.
Pursuant to Section l2-7H-7, Exteior Alterations or ModiJications, in part, of the Vail Town Code,
"the construction ofa new building or the alteration of an aisting building that is not a major
exteior alteration as described in Section I2-7H-7A 2 shall be reviewed by the Design Review
Board in accordance with Chapter I I of this Title. "
Furthermore,
"the submittal items required for a project that is not a major exterior alteration shatl be provided
in accordance with Section I 2-l I -4 of this Title. "
Copies ofSectiots l2-7H-7 and l2-1 14 of the Vail Town Code have been attached for reference.
TOWN OFVAIL
Depailment of Community Development
{gun*or ro
Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. I can be reached by telephone at
(970) 4'79-214s.
Good luck with your project.
Sincerely,
rl*Q,*J,-t
George Ruther, AICP
Chief of Planning
Town of Vai.l
fficD JAN 23 2002
January 21,2OO2
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vall Marriott Mountain R$ort
Phase 2 remodel
Dear George,
Pursuant to our submittal for DRB review of the modifications to the approved plans, please
note the following:
1. We have not determined the plan for the pyramid condominium so the
fenestration is either not shown or subject to change. We would ask that we be
given final DRB approval with the understanding that we return at a later date for
review of the condo windows.
2. In response to comments from the DRB at the conceptual review, we have
changed the shape of the dormer windows to have a radiused top. This
increases the gap between the window corner and the fascia as requested.
3. In response to comments from the DRB at the conceptual review, we have added
detail to the windows of the top floor that are set in the shingle-covered vertical
wall. We propose to trim this window with grey metal trim and a grey metal
"hat". We prefer grey to match the roofing as a way to minimize the emphasis
of these "attic" windows.
4. ln response to comments from the DRB at the conceptual review, we have
revised the shape of the window/door head trip to something that is less "dippy"
when scaled down to a single window. We have also revised the trim at the
level immediately below the porch to have an arched shape. This is intended to
give a bit more detail to the elevation by creating a layer that is special and
different than those below.
5. We have also added trim to the windows in the field of "wood" siding to again
increase the level of detail.
George Ruther- January 21 , 2OO2
Page 2
6. At the building connecting Buildings 2 and 3, we have added a stone- column
portico with a low roof. Above this roof we propose stone veneer at the
recessed wall and horizontal cement board siding on the walls above that.
7. The wood fascia at the existing spa wing at the south end of building 2 will be
replaced by EIFS in the bright white color. We will not be replacing the spa
windows at this time.
8. We have added square footage to the hotels rooms by reclaiming several
balconies and re-configuring corridor walls to accommodate the proposed larger
bath (to match baths in buiding 31. TOTAL new SF is approx 663 SF < 1 0O0 SF.
Together with the revised plans and elevations being delivered to you today, we will give
you samples of the cement board siding, window colors, and EIFS. I will need these back.
VR is continuing to develop the program for this project and we will continue to update the
drawings. I will get revised drawings to you the Friday before the 6d', We hope to get final
DRBapproval as quickly as possible.
Sincerely,
Z ARCHITECTS. P.C.
AIA
February 4,2OO2
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Marriott Mountain Resort
Phase 2 remodel
Dear George,
As requested, here are the latest full-size drawings for the Building 2 remodel at the Vail
Marriott. The drawings we present to the DRB on Wednesday will probably be even more
evolved as the Ownership has asked us to make some additional minor changes.
Given that Gil McNeish has called, we are showing the outline of the previously approved
design on the elevations. We will also bring the old model. These will clearly show that the
height and mass of the new design are substantially less than the previous design for the
pyramid and north end,
The changes reflected in these plans are:
The Ownership has requested that we ma*imize balconies and French balconies.
We have added French balconies on all sides. At level 132 on the west side
between grids C and D, we will create 2 new real balconies behind the "porch
fagade". For the presentation on the 6th, the drawings will also show French
balconies at rooms that sit directly above roof surfaces of adjacent buildings.
To visually protect the top level French balconies that are located at the south
end of the building in the field of wood siding, we have added 2' deep eyebrow
roofs as was done on Building 3. These also serve to add some visual interest to
this area of the fagade as we are proposing beams and brackets to support them.
We have added non-functioning shutters, to be constructed of cement board, to
all possible windows. They will be detailed with strap hinges and shutter dogs as
if they were real. This is to give more detail to the building than was done at
Building 3 (this feature may be added to Building 3 as well in the future- subject
to DRB approval of course).
1.
2.
3.
George Ruther- January 21 ,2OO2
Page 2
4. We have changed the exterior wall material at the connection building between
buildings 2 and 3 from cement lap siding to cement board shingles. This is in
response to the DRB comment at the conceptual meeting. Color will again be a
wood color but different than the siding color on Building 2. We are still
researching the color and will present it to the DRB on Wednesday.
5. The conversion of 4 hotel rooms at the south end of the 6'h floor into a 2
bedroom condominium has been returned to the drawings although the interior
layout has not been determined. This was approved two years ago. We have
also added to the drawings the south-facing recessed decks in the south roof
that were approved previously as part of this condominium conversion.
Fenestration has also been modified to reflect this change.
6. We have changed the support columns for the south portico between Building 3
and the pool building at Building 2 lrom stone to heavy timber. The stone
columns were simply too big to fit in the available space.
7. We have designated two suites on the 6th and 7s floors as ADA suites (no
change to keys or floor area from the previous approvall and added two windows
on the 7rn floor west elevation to reflect the new floor plan.
All materials and colors are as previously submitted. We have revised the old model to show
the updated Antlers, the existing parking garage (Gore Creek Club removed pending new
designl, the actual Building 3 design and the proposed design for Building 2. The model for
Building t has not been revised and will still show the approved design. We intend to return
to the DRB in a month or so to discuss this wing. We hope this will not be a distraction to
the DRB at this time.
The Porte Cochere design remains as previously approved. We are proposing to wrap the
longitudinal steel beams with cement board (color as submitted for the cement board siding)
and to use real timber trusses and wood decking. Roofing to be asphalt.
The schedule for construction for Buildings 2 and 1 is even tighter than that for Building 3.
We need final DRB approval on the 66 and certainly no later than the 20fr. Given the
minimal number of suggestions and comment at the conceptual meeting, we hope this will
not be an unreasonable request.
Sincerely,
LTZ ARCHITECTS.
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
TOI4'N#
o
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Depaffnent of Community Development
75 Sorrth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2L39 faxt 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
Project Name: Minor Alteration DRB Number: DRB020001
Prcject Description:
Paint ballroom elterior to match o<isting
Pafticipants:
OWNER HMC ACQUISmON PROPERTIES 101/0212002 Phone:
C/O MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
ONE MARRIOTT DR DEPT 938.01
WASHINGTON DC 20058
License:
APPLICANT Gwathmey Pratt SchulE Archi0l/02/2002 Phone: 476-LL47
Henry Pratt
1000 Frontage Rd West
Vail, CO 81657
License:
Prcject Address: 715 W UONSHEAD CR VAIL Location: Ballroom exterior
Legal Description: Lot: C&D Block Subdivision: MORCUS SUB.
Parcel Number: 210107207001
Comments: See condition regarding paint color
BOARD/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Pierce Action: APPROVED
Second By: Woldrich
Vote: 4-0 Date of APProYalt 0UtLl2O02
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PI-AN): DRB approval does not onstitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities'
Cond: CON0005160
That the stucco color matches the stone color around the base of the hotel.
Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Paid: $20.00
,o
,,-t)Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479,2139 fax: 97O.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co.us
General Informadon:
This application is for any project reguiring Design Review approrral. Any project requiring design re\riew must
reeive apprwal prior to $bmiting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the
particular appro\ral that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be aae*ed until all requircd
infurmatbn is received by the Ommunity Developrnent Departrnent. The proFct rmy also need to be reMewed by
the To/vn Coundl and/or the Planning and Environmental Cornmission. Dcdgn Rcrriait Bo.d rpproYtl hpecr
unleo a bulldlng pcrmlt b brucd rrd onrtsucdon cornmsrer rrlurln mc ycar of the approval.
Phpical Addruco:
Palcl ilo.: .2i0 / O?ilhlno t (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 97tr328-86,10 for parcel no.)
Zonlng:L+4U.1
Deccrlpdon of the nsque!'b
l{ane(s) of Ouner($:-\rc* thrus 4o
l,lalllng Addrcse:
Phone:64q-29€9
Owne(s) $gnaturc(a):
l{ameof Appllcant:rEcrg
llalllngAddrw:
VAIL
fyFof n€Yiiland Fee:
E Ne$, @nsfuuctiontr Addition
fl Minor Alteration
tr ChangestoApproved Plans $20
$200
$s0
$20
For con*ruction of a new building or derno/rebuild.
For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
comrnercial building (indudes 250 additions & interior conversions).
For minor changes b buildings and site impro/ements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window addiuon+ landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the
Design Review Board
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, AI.L SUBMTTTAL REQUIREMENTS
AND THE FEE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLOMDO 81657.
For O'fne Ure Orb:
Fee Paid: 4*'t -
check No.:-.lb4?L By:-
Application Date:j DRB No,:
!{:57u Fru-GRl
!|
ISHtil|ltAiRl
o
, I 3018303t38
Gmusrr.rw & [IlnnrNc
.A PROAES S ION^T. CORPOR.ATIOII
aT.roRNEts .dr r.Aw
soTTE 360()A''III5 trArcO CENTER
ITOO LTNCOIJ{ STREET
DElrvER, COI-(TRADO 80eo3-4s98
TEttPttoNE (3061 a39-3800
TEr.EcoPrER t3a9 439-g83a
E-MAIL r rrroxe6EtrsE '.E .tnDr.r.cola
I
T-s13 P.00el005 t-112
I
gmcneis\@-erimshawharriog.com
hnp://www.grimshawharring.com
G i lbcn F. McNcish
(i03) 839-3722
I
I
January g,ZW
i
Ilt
I I ,ofApproval I I It'1tll
Dear Henry: I \ | t
\l'tri
I am wrfting rQ you on behalf of tre Vail Spa Condominium Association ('vaili Spa')
I4A FACSIUTI.E i I970-475-t612 'r{r\
l'4r. Htnry Pran \
Gurqthrn ewjP,.att .& SchnlrzGwathmsY.lPsn&Schultz ' I I IArihitects,P.c. ' I L t I
1000 South Frontage Road West I I Ivail. co 81657 I I I
' *", rvraniln rrJel - $oposed Exterior Alrcration - Design Rwiew Board - conaitilns
r r ,ofApproval | , \ |
I am wrfting td you on behalf of tre Vail Spa Condominium Association ('vaill Spa')
T":r{lC dr: p.t:ry_d extcrior alterati{ns to tfr" Maniort Hotcl pending before the Vail fesienReview Board ("DRB"). I I
'l,l
I indicated to you that ir is my belief ttrat theie conditions of approval remain ilr forcc
ing yor.u pending ap$fication to amend the previous dcsig4 approval for th{ hotel.
\
01r57n Fron-0RlISI{AIiIHARRlltGo
Hmry Pratt
I
Febnrary 25,2002
Page2
3038393838 T-t{3 P.003/005 l-112
o
Please havp an authorized reprcsenlative of Vail Resons sign es indicate
ackrowledging thelragreemmtto thetlrrte couditions ofapprowal as originally set forthin
\l
GFIU/jrnh
cc: Gcorge Rrahcr (via frcsimile)
Al urd Loma l{auser (via facsimile)
I
below
l letter
r after
I
,)ll f
I
ci I J | 531 l\l.ETl''.R5rLPt9|r!.1!5@,rnC
I
,f
t\
I
I
t
II'
l{ll
\
,\
{
, Nwertheless, sincc Vail Resorts has succeeded Host Msriott as owner of the hotel, I am
lin ensruing thar my pnderstanding is co'rrect; an{ ttrereford, I am seeking a ratificati
understanding from Vail Resorts through you as part ofttre final dcsign rcview by the I
I"l
rl
o
FtLt ctlPr
Depmtment of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Yail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 r 38
FAX 970-479-2452
www.ci,vail.co.us
Decernber 3, 2001
Mr. Henry Pratt
Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz, Architects, P.C.
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail. Colorado 81657
Yail Mariott Mountain Resort Phase 3 reconstuction - turret rooJing
Dear Henry,
Thank you for your letter of November 27,2001, following up on our discussion regarding the re-roofing
altematives for the turrels at the Vail Marriott Mountain Resort.
The purpose ofmy letter is to confirm the Town's approval of the Zappone solid copper shingles. I
understand that these solid-rnaterial shingles are an upgrade of the previously approved copper and asphalt
laminated shingles approved by the Design Review Board. I further understand that the shingles will not
be pre-patinated and will be allowed to patina over time.
Should you have any questions or concerns, or if I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
call. You can reach me by telephone at 479-2145 or by e-mail at g4hgl@livailggJfq.
Sincerely,
fQR,-*t*-,
George Ruther, AICP
ChiefofPlanning
Town of Vail
{g un uo"^o,
November 27, 2OO'l
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Maniott Mountain Resort
Phase 3 reconstruction- turot roofing
Dear George,
As a foflow-up to our discussion of copper roofing alternates on November 8,2OO1, please
accept the following as documentation of our decision.
Due to delivery problems associated with the Toisite copper laminated shingles approved for
use on the turrets, we are unable to acquire this material in time for the scheduled
completion of the proiect on or before December 1sth, 2001. The Contractor has r€quostod
that we be allowed to substitute solid copper shingles by Zappone (please see their web site
www.zappone.com for information and technical data). The shingles will not be pre-
patinated. This proposed material is a substantial upgrade to the approved material both in
terms of quality and cost.
It was your determination that the proposed solid copper roofing shingles were indeed a
significant upgrade to the approved material and that we could proceed without having to
return to the DRB.
Sincerely,
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
RE0D NOV 27 ?r,O1
l,t
'i r)
l#.(!i t
w"t
ta
C ctpp er
"tlouric- i Ci-i'r, CtJtlr* JiAt iince Jrtt'q*Si
Th. Zuppo.t. Copper Shingle is the recognized industry leader in quality, performance an<l number of homes pro-
tected. Produced by the country's oldest continuous copper shingle manufacturer, Zappone is the shingle most
specified by architects, homeowners and contrac-
tors.
Uopper roofing has alrvays possessetl a quiet.
understated and desirable elegiance. Zappone adds
another quality to copper's elepiance - affordability.
Zappone's unique manufacturing process and the
designed ease of installation makes the richne.ss of
America's premier roofing available at accessible
orices.
Superior u,irul, ruin und erosion resistance mukes the Zappone Shingle
perfect for tntpicul urul ocean frcn settings.
The luxury of copper, which ruas once found only on the
homes of the world's wealthiest, is norv attainable by all who
appreciate its unmatched looks and unparalleled performance.
Zappone has made copper available and affordable to all those
who decide the investment in their homes is deservinp of the
ultimate in nrotection.
Copper has the longest life-spun und loutest life-cucle uxt ol'
all roctlino materials.
Onlg cr,ryper rcofs actuallg improue aith uge. The patinu pror-ess quaruntees a neuer-ending rich and beautilul appearance for
the life of ltour home.
More duruble than steel, lighter thun slate, copper is uniquelg suited
for permanent roofing.
The architectural design of the Zappone shingle has
been acclaimed for both its performance and its beauty.
The Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation has chosen the
Zappone shingle for special projects, citing its rich,
warm appearance and its "powerful imagery, terrific
color and a shadowline that says 'home'." Remodeling
Magazine named it "Product of the Year" and Building
Product Guide selected it as one of its "Top 25 Building
Products".
Contractors prefer the Zappone shingle for its practicali-
ty. The shadow-cup feature creates the distinctive shad-
owline preferred by architects and also allours the shingle
to be walked on. The four-way interlock provides the
industry's best protection against wind and wind-driven
rain and prevents problems associated rvith expansion
and contraction that longer panel-type shingles experi-
ence. This results in a time-saving and money-savinS
installation with no need for clips, cleats or joint pans.
The design has been tested to hurricane standards in the
laboratory, but more importantly, it has been tested by
hurricanes in nature...and it passed nrith flying colors.
With a Class A fire rating, and top marks in all penetra-
tion, material and wind-driven rain tests, the shingle has
proven to be as tou$h as it is beautiful. A unique combi-
nation in roofing.
Discovered over 10,000 years ago, coppel mankind's
first metal, has proven itself as the premier roofing
material. It's longevity is legendary and it is featured
on more of the worlds most treasured buildings than
any other material.
The Zappone shingle has also proven itself. Since its
introduction in 1969 it has won more awards for
quality, design and performance than any other cop-
per shingle. Just as copper has set the standard for
roofing, for over 30 years, Zappone has set the stan-
dard for copper.
As touqh as it is beautiful, the Zappone Shingle protects and
enhances euen in the most rugged alpine climotes.
In these photos, taken nine gears apart, the rich patina coloring
ctf the .shingles is alreadg euident.
i i:: r'
Year 1 Year 15
Unlike steel, copper does not rust. Instead, a protective
coating, or "patina" Jorms on its surface. While this
process may be affecled by local conditions, it normally
follows the pattern illustrated above. Usually copper is
allowed to patina naturally, however, solutions are avail-
able to accelerate or prevent the process.
,''l llt:'.{ i i' ,t I ii ,l i i ,,i.t ''1 Normal Composition:
Size:
Weight:
Th ickness:
Density:
Temper:
Tensile Strength:
Yield Strength at 0.5%
Extension Under Load:
Elongation (% in 2 in.):
Rockwell Hardness:
Melting Point:
Thermal Conductivity,
BTU/sq. ft./hr./degree F.
@ 68 Degrees F.:
Specifications:
Wind Rating:
Fire Rating:
ICBO Approval #:
Recycled Content:
Self -A I i gn i n g Tg!____+
Male Taoered
lnterlock Channel
Walking Area
3/8" Profile
Copper 110 (99.9+% Copper)
15" x 9'/e", Exposed to Weather: 14'1"" x 8'lu"
'1 .24 lb/sq. 11. - 124 lb/100 sq. ft.
.01 8" (+f Commercial Tolerance)
0.322 lb/cu. in.
3/4 Hard H03
48,000 psi
46,000 psi
6
77/78 Scale 15f
1981 Degrees F.
226
ASTM 8152 (Mech.), ASTM 8370 (Chem.)
1.10 MPH
Class A, B, C
4995
75"k'85"/"
,/
Weather E
Concealed "S"
Interlocking Nailing
Anti-Capillary
Ridge
\Female Tapered
Interlock Channel
MANUFACTURING
800.285.2677
N. 2928 Piftsburg St., Spokane, WA 99207 . 509.483.6408 . FAX: 509.483.8050
www.zappone.com . Email: copper @ zappone.com
Stafter Strip/Eave Edge Gable End/Rake Piece End Wall Side Wall
Valley Ridge Cap Continuous Ridqe Accent (Half-Sized) Shingle
TOI4'N#
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Departrnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, @lorado 81657
te| 970.479.2139 f ax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci,vail.co.us
Prclect Name: Change to previously approved plans DRB ilumber: DR8010225
Prorect Descrlpton:
Change roofing material
Partidpants:
OWNER HMC ACQUISffiON PROPERTIES 10231/2001 Phone:
Vo MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL
ONE MARRIOTT DR DEPT 938,01
WASHINGTON DC 20058
Licens€:
APPUCANT GwathmeyPrattSchultz 0713L1200L Phone: 476-1L47
1000 S Frontage Rd West
Vail, CO
Henry Pratt 81657
Licenser
Project Addrcss: Location:
Legal Descripuon! Lot: Block: Subdivision: MARK RESORT&TENNIS CLU
Parcel Number: 210107212001
Comments: See Conditions
BOARD/STAFF ACTIOI{
Motion By: Woldrich Action: APPROVED
Seaond By: Acevado
Votq 3{ DateofApproval: 08/03/2001
Conditions:
Cond: 8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail stafr and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Entry: 08/03/2001 By: George Action: AP
@nd:0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities'
Condr CON0004926
That the applicant use Grand Manor colonial slate asphalt shingles of 425 pounds per
square on the roof of the hotel addition and that individual pre-patinaed copper
shingles be used on the two tunet portions of the hotel.
Planner: George Ruther DRB Fee Pald: $20.00
i'rul::.Lr;:'1,., : ifl,,: ;:i;r:'r f {.i ,(iiii ,,. -i.;'(.i - i"il.-1
ill11!APPLICATION FOR DESI6I.{ REVIEW APPROVAL
lIi\itRAL iNioR_MA r IOry
Inrs aoplication is for any pro]ect req iring Design lie\,,iq!v apprcval. r\ny lrcject requiririg design re,irew must
feEeive D€ssln Review approval prior to srrhrrriilrng fi:r a buriciing lerrnit. f 0r speclfic rnfonnahon, see thc submittal
iequileffents for the partlcula r approval lhat rs reiltre€ted. The appiication c;innct be accepted untrf all the requlred
information ls submitted. The prolect may aiso need to be revie,rrerj by the Tbrvn Council and/or the planning and
Envrronmefltal C0mmssion. Design Review Boa rd approval expires one year afterfinal approval unlees
a brilding permit is i*rued and construction is started.
DESCRTPION OF rHE RFQUESI:12rr1g gLA
LOCATION OF PROPOSAI.: LOTI ela-B[-OCKi 1,1p1s6. lTl0,F4r/?svB.
L.
D.
E.
r.
PARCEL *, 2 /01 AbLAM(conaa Easte co. Assessors orfice at rro;;il t". *.* -)
S) SIGNATURE(S):
PHONE:
PHYSICAIADDNTSS.,JIS U . LI I tecLg
Construction of a new building.
Includes any addition ,/vnere square footage is added to any
residential or commercial buitding.
fttctudes minor changes to buildings and site improvernents, such
a1 reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.
DRB fees ane to be paid at the tinrc i)f subrnittal. r.ater, ,n hen (rpplving for a building perm& please identify
the accurate '/aluation of the projecl" i"he [r:wn oi Vail ,,^rijl adlust the fee according to the project vafuation"
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITT.AL REQUIREMENTS
AITID T}IE FEE TO TTtE DEPARTMENT OF COI{MUT{ITY D€VELOPMENT,
75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAI|, COTORADO 81657.
OF REVIEW AND FEE:
I{ew Construction - 9200
Addition - $50
MinorAlteration - $20
Ac.&r/FtngN reoP&znE6
TYPE
n
n
X
i'ee.Pard: ^10Jqppflcauon iJtsTe:.ryl,,,Lq!rvr !
:)re-Application fvleeting
cx+:5Q2fi-
Froject ikl.: . ,
JUL 3 0 2001
l-O
TYPE OF MATERIAL:BUILDING MATERiALS:
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fccia
Soffib
Windo$,s
Window Trim
Doors
DoorTrim
Hand or Deck Raib
Flues
Flashing
Chimneys
Tnsh Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walb
Exterior Lighting
Oher
rAftil0l/-.
COLOR:
Crzt-oPrPa- :d-rT€
stfoNE flgNEere-/nArcd e*lEndq
* Phase specify the manufacturer=s color, number and attach a srnall color chip
** All e<Erior lighting must rneet the Torvn=s Lighting ordinance 12-11-5J. If e*erior lightirp b pmpced,
please indicate the number of fixures and locations on a separate lighUng plan. Identiff each ftture type
and provide the height abo\re grade, lumens output, luminous area, and attach a cut sheet of $e lighting
futures.
t Residential Roofing: Certaln\J Specifications: Technical Product InJation: Grandlv... Page 1 of 5
RarHenthl Roollng: Gertaln?eod: Speclflcatlotti
Technical Product Information
Grand Manor Shangle@ Roofing Shingles
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Roofing Products Group
750 E. Swedesford Road
P.O. Box #860
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Phone: (800) 233-8990
FAX: (610) 341-7940
I Pr,odu-ctDetail I Technjeal-Pro-d.uct-lnf.o lArehtt-e-c-,tural Specificetions I
lnstallation* | Warranty I
Certairilbe*|H Contractor's EDGEil
Programs
lnstallation
Products
Residential
Commercial
Sales Regions/Maps
Specifications
Technical Bulletins
Wananties
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
This product is the super heavyweight of laminated shingles. The difference is in the size and
quality built-in by design. An 8" tab area, complete with two full-sized one-piece base shingles
with random tabs and accented by shadow lines, gives an authentic, natural look with true depth
and dimension. They are most aesthetically appealing when used on slopes of 9" per foot or
greater. When applied, Grand Manor produces five layers of roof protection and the quality is
reminiscent of handcrafted workmanship.
Grand Manor shingles are algae (commonly called fungus) resistant and thus protect against
staining or discoloration caused by algae.
Grand Manor shingles are available in the following colors: Black Pearl, Brownstone, Colonial
Slate, Gatehouse Slate, Georgian Brick, Heirloom Silver, Sherwood Forest, and Stonegate Gray.
Pre-cut Grand Manor Shangle/Carriage House Shangle Accessory roofing shingles of the
matching color are to be used for capping the hips and ridges. These accessory shingles are two
layers adhered together and do not have the additional random tabs.
Limitations
Use on roofs with slopes greater than 2" per foot. However, slopes greater than 9" per foot best
show the product design. Low slope applications (2" to 4" per foot) require additional
underlayment. In areas where icing along the eaves can cause the back-up of water, apply
CertainTeed WinterGuardru Waterproofing Shingle Underlayment, or its equivalent, according to
application instructions provided with the product and on the shingle Plckage.
On slopes greater than2l" per foot, apply three l" diameter spots of asphalt roofrng cement
(ASTM D 4586, Type II) under the shingle, according to application instructions provided with
the product and the shingle package.
Composition and Materials
Grand Manor shingles are composed of a fiber glass mat base. Ceramic-coated mineral granules
are tightly embedded in carefully refined, water-resistant asphalt. The laminated tabs are firmly
http:i/www.certainteed.com/pro/roofing/chooflgmanor/gmanor-specs.html 7/27/01
Residential Roofing: CertainTJ Specifications: Technical Product InJation: GrandN... Page 2 of 5
adhered in a special tough asphaltic cement. These fiber glass based shingles have self-sealing
adhesive applied.
TECHNICAL DATA
Applicable Standards
ASTM D 3018, Type I
ASTM D 3462
ASTM E 108 Fire Resistance: Class A
ASTM D 3161 Type I Wind Resistance
UL790 Fire Resistance
IJL997 Wind Resistance
NYC-hIEA-120-79-M
BOCA & SBCCI Building Codes
CSA Standard A123.5-98
Ontario BMEC Auth. 97-10-219
Miami-Dade Product Control Acceptance
Weights and Sizes
WeighVSquare (approx.): 425 lbs.
Dimensions (overall): 18" x 36" (English)
ShingleVSquare: 50
Weather Exposure: 8"
r Back to Top
INSTALLATION
Detailed installation instructions including diagrams are supplied on each bundle of Grand Manor
shingles, or separate application sheets may be obtained from CertainTeed. The following is a
general sunmary of the installation methods.
NOTE - Refer to application instructions supplied with the shingles for further information and
application procedure.
Roof Deck Requirements
Apply shingles to minimum 3/8" thick plywood, minimum 7/16" thick non-veneer, or minimum
1" thick (nominal) wood decks. The plywood or non-veneer decks must comply with the
specifications of the APA - the Engineered Wood Association.
Ventilation
Provisions for ventilation should meet or exceed current HUD standards. To best ensure adequate
ventilation, use a combination of continuous ridge ventilation (using a product such as Ridge
FilterVent@ or Ridge Filter ShingleVent@ II, manufactured by Air Vent Inc., a CertainTeed
subsidiary) and balanced soffit venting.
Valleys
Open valley is recommended. Valley liner must be applied before shingles. It must be minimum
18" wide l6 oz. copper, or its equivalent, installed over 36" wide self-adhering CertainTeed
WinterGuard Waterproofing Shingle Underlayment (apply directly to deck), or applied over 36"
wide mineral surfaced roll roofing. After WinterGuard has been applied, install the 16-oz. copper
centered in the valley. Refer to the application instructions on the shingle packaging for further
information.
http ://www. certainteed.com/pro/roofi nglchoofl gmanor/gmanor_specs.html 7/27/01
Residential Roofing: Certainf: Specifications: Technical Product Ifation: Grandlv... Page 3 of 5
Underlayment
At standard slopes (4" per foot or greater) a single layer of Roofers' SelectrM High-Performance
shingle underlayment (or product meeting ASTM D 4869) is recommended. For UL fire rating,
underlayment may be required. Corrosion-resistant drip edge is recommended and should be
placed over the underlayment at the rake and beneath the underlayment at the eaves.
On low slopes (2" to 4" per foot), apply CertainTeed WinterGuard Waterproofing Shingle
Underlayment or its equivalent, or two layers of 36" wide felt shingle underlayment (Roofers'
Select High-Performance Underlayment or product meeting ASTM D 4869) lapped 19", over
entire deck according to the application instructions provided with the product. When
WinterGuard is applied to the rake are4 the drip edge may be installed under or over
WinterGuard. At the eave, when WinterGuard does not overlap the gutter or fascia, the drip edge
must be installed under WinterGuard. When WinterGuard overlaps the fascia or gutter, the drip
edge or other metal must be installed over it.
I Back to Top
Fastening
Five nails are required per shingle. They are to be located 5/8" above the cutouts (8 5/8" above the
bottom edge of the shingle) and l" in from each side of the shingle. Nails must be of sufficient
length to penetrate into the deck 3/4" or through the thickness of the decking, whichever is less.
For new construction, nails must never be less than I l/2" long, for reroofing never less than I
3/4" long, and for caps a minimum of. | 3/4" long. Nails are to be 1l or l2-gauge, corrosion-
resistant roofing nails with 3/8" heads.
To prevent slippage ofthe laminated tabs when shingles are applied to slopes exceeding 21" per
foot or when individual shingles meet a wall or ridge at any slope, an additional fastener is to be
horizontally centered on each laminated tab and placed within I ll2" of the upper edge of the
shingle.
For application ofcopper valley, use copper cleats or large head copper nails.
Application
The recommended application method is the"4 l/2" Stepped-Off, Single Column Vertical-
Racking Method" found on each bundle of shingles. These shingles may be used for new
construction or for reroofing over one layer ofold shingles, but due to the heavy weight ofthis
shingle, it is important to determine that the roof deck is in satisfactory condition for the
application of these shingles. Refer to product wrap for detailed reroofing limitations. All shingles
on the finished roof must be applied with five fasteners. The weather exposure of tlese shingles is
8".
Special Application: CertainTeed Caniage House Shangle shingles can be blended into a
CertainTeed Grand Manor Shangle roof to achieve a unique and distinctive appearance. A
common application method uses several courses of Caniage House Shangle in the middle of a
Grand Manor roof. Other aesthetically appealing applications are possible using Grand Manor and
Cariage House Shangle shingles. Contact CertainTeed for more informafion.
Flashing
Use corrosion-resistant metal flashing. Please refer to illusnation on our shingle packaging.
Ilips and Ridges
http:/iwww.certainteed.com/pro/roofing/ctrooflgmanor/gmanor_specs.hfnl 7/27/01
Residential Roofing: Certainf Specifications: Technical Product lfation: Grandlv... Page 4 of 5
Use only Grand Manor Shangle/Caniage House Shangle Accessory shingles of the matching
color for capping the hips and ridges.
AVAILABILITYAIID COST
Availability: For the names of local distributors and dealers, please contact:
Architectural Support
P.O. Box #860
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Phone: (800) 233-8990
Fax: (610) 341-7940
Cost: Contact a local distributor or dealer for current price information.
r Bec_k-to fsp_
WARRANTY
Grand Manor Shangle carries a lifetime limited transferable warranty against manufacturing
defects for the original homeowner. In addition, Grand Manor also carries lO-year SureStartrM
Protection. For specific warranty details and limitations, refer to the warranty itself (available
from the local supplier, roofing contractor, or by writing to CertainTeed Corporation).
MAINTENAIICE
Grand Manor shingles require virtually no maintenance when installed according to
manufacturer's application instructions. However, to protect the investment, any roof should be
routinely inspected at least once a year. Older roofs should be looked at more frequently.
TECHNICAL SERYICES
Complete technical support and assistance are available through Architectural Support personnel,
Territory Managers, and the fully staffed and equipped Research and Development facility in
Blue Bell. PA.
FILING SYSTEMS
Sweets@ Catalog; Sweets@ Internet Website: www.sweets.com
Sweet Source@ Electronic Catalog
ARCAT@; ARCAT@ Intemet Website: www.arcat.com
For additional information and literature contact:
Architectural Support
P.O. Box #860
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Phone: (800) 233-8990
Fax (610) 341-7940
r Back to Top
*To view, download and print a PDF file of the Application Instructions, Adobe
Acrobat@ Reader must be installed on your computer.Click on the "Get Acrobat
Reader" icon for free download and installation.
http://www.certainteed.com/pro/roofing/chooflgmanor/gmanor_specs.hffnl 7t27/01
'
- hes:d€Nili.111s6fing: "*U Specifications: Technical Product
tration:
GrandIV... Page 5 of 5
I costg I E gort IEAGI I otossary | Related web sites I Services l whafs Nerr I
0 2001 CertainTecd Corycation. All rights reserved.
h@ ://www. certainteed.com/pro/roofing/ctoofl gmanor/gmanor-specs.html 7t27tol
l*t*ltlf tf +*:t!tl*t*it*t***il!t!t'|l***'ll* **'t'il{rlt't**t*trttl*{r'}**rttt'}'}*i*****{t'}'}*l+**'}**'t!ttlrtt'l*'}*l
TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO stst60ent
Itt'it+***ttf llt*'i'it+lt**,il*'|{r*+*'t*af t*'}*****'t{t*'|**'}**l*'l*'l*+***'},l{tt*+***'}'t'} +**'}{'**+l+*'}+**'}'}l
Statsement lfirmber: R000001152 Arnount: $20.00 07/3LlzooLO8:41 All
Palnnent llethod: Check Init: .fAR
Notation: 5020
Permit No: DRBo10225 TSre: DRB - llinor Alteration
Parcel No: 210107212001
Site Addrese:
L,ocation:
Total Fees: 920.00
T'hia Payment: $20. O0 Total IILIJ ['rntE: 920.00
Balance: 90.00
'lt **rtt tt*tr* ****t *rl't'|* ***'t* **'l** t*+*{t* t*'t:t't* ****** *** *'** *'}'t*** **'r't* ***{t* ***:}*'lt'}** +*at******'}*
ACCOTJNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code DescriDtion Current Pmts
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIE!\I FEES 20.00
Gilbert F. McNeish
303-839-3722
George Ruther, AICP
Chief of Planning
Department of Community Development
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gntr"rsurw & H.tnnrNc
.T PROFESSIONAL OORPORATION
.{TTORNEYS AT I.AW'
surTE 3000
WELLS EAROO CENTER
ITOO LINCOIN STREET
DENVER, COLORADO AOeO3.45g8
TELBPTloNE (303) 839-9800
TELECOPTER. (303) 839-3A36
E-}lAI L xlruoxeoatxsBAreru.RRtxo.cox
April 18,2001
IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REOUESTED
gmcneish@grimshawharring.com
www. grimshawharring. com
Via Facsimile 970-479-2452
Re: Maniott Hotel - Proposed Exterior Alteration (Phase III) - Design Review Board -
Conditions of Approval
Dear George:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Vail Spa Condominium Association ("Vail Spa")
conceming the proposed exterior alterations to the Marriott Hotel pending before the Vail Design
Review Board ("DRB").
I have been engaged in discussions with George Pratt and Karen Erlich with Host Marriott
concerning this matter, and an agreement has been reached with Marriott concerning Vail Spa's
objections to the current Maniott proposal. First, Marriott has agreed to accept the imposition by
the DRB ofthe following conditions of approval to its application concerning the proposed exterior
alterations now pending before the DRB for final approval:
l) There shall be no flag poles, flags, pennants, wires, telecommunication facilities
(towers or antennas) or any other structures or extensions ofany kind attached to any part ofthe two
new tunet elements on the Phase III roof, irrespective of whether such attachments are temporary
or permanent in nature; subject, however, to the provision that lightning rods with necessary
appurtenances, including wires, shall be permitted.
2) There shall be no exterior lighting of, or on the turret structures on the Phase III roof.
:uther
3) Compliance with these conditions shall be subject to all codes, ordinances, rules, and
regulations (federal, state and local) goveming Marriott's hotel at Vail. In the event that any
condition contained herein conflicts with any code, ordinance, rule or regulation (federal, state or
local) Maniott shall comply with the code, ordinance, rule or regulation and such compliance shall
not be deemed a violation of the conditions referred to herein.
Second, Vail Spa has agreed that if the above conditions are imposed by the DRB as part of
its final approval ofthe Marriott application, Vail Spawill withdrawits appeal scheduled forhearing
before the Vail Planning and Environmental Commission on April 23, 2001, and will further agree
to waive any and all rights of appeal it may have conceming the pending Marriott application.
Please present to the DRB at its hearing conceming the Marriott application today the three
conditions ofapproval noted above, and request on Vail Spa's behalfthat these provisions be made
conditions of approval to the Marriott application. Henry Pratt will confirm that these conditions
of approval are acceptable to Marriott, and that they are necessary to effectuate the settlement
agreement which Vail Spa has reached with Maniott.
Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me immediately at 303-839-
3722. Thank you for your assistance in effectuating Vail Spa's settlement with the Marriott
regarding concems associated with Maniott's application pending before tJre DRB.
Very truly yours,
GRIMSHAW & HARRING,
$ Professional Corporation
b
cc:Al Hauser (970) 476-5548
Karen Erlich (301 )380-6332
Henry Pratt (970) 476-1612
Gilbert F. McNeish
G 113 I 53U\Lruthcrlcttcr3. qDd
c\aO(\J
60
'.:\1
z.'{-l
o(J
tJ-lG
$lo
all
T
Izlol
FI
$l
tulJIul
FI
rf)l
lul
<l
AI
rul(nl
Pl'oli
Ml5
Ll$o
r-'-u
I
I
I,-- !' \---.1?
-t'
tt"tt'
\\\\\
.'-'j
I
I
I
I
@-
o--
rar-er-
o-
o-
o-
o-
o-
o-
o-
##$tu$$ftil
x
{l}
fli
dr
tldI
o-o
I|r Hr I|l fl*$rJ###i$$
I
d.
fll+
!,
tr
:
$l
9o
Y
o-
o-
o-
ti
tl'. ,lr
o
Izlol
FI
$l
lulJI
rul
FI
rDl
<ltul
AI
rul
(f)l
ol
rLli
olJ
MI5Ll$
@
o
o
o
.ldlfll
4dflidi++
do
c0
Y
(:_-:- -
o-
o-
l"l.tt dirr flr$i ltd++
rl rl [l d[1*|HiHiiliiiriliHi?+++++
o-
A.eo- I I; Y f0\Aaql ifo\f-ilGjtvyvv IR-
$i$z
"qs
Pd*
SnlllJ --r{
rt $$
f
o-oI
E$
-s
$lutrao>rDFOr
$g
odF<
R$fd
tI{
b
u-
$
r-t:o
EI
---t
/o\le/-
-@
/o\\</F- --------
[$*
=q$
if;q
HEfr
I
ail
{
u.lu{
IJIL
5u
rP
$g
T
I
L
E
tv
$il
>!l
tp
fi$
dP
$$
ui/
-@
/a\
\<.,/
@-o
Pztuflg
+v
lL-<lu
sI
ruz|J-
ff
I-I-------
-ofi
-l 8"
ei$z$$
Pd*
$e{lU -;{
rt Ffr
[H$ iqP
I6]\\P/tv.
x
dJIL
0-
h
I
fiu
$
IL
J>O
1$"
tEfbS*
dp$
$$$
s
/d\\e/-
i$6o
+H
$H
o-o
BI
]J
;-A
{p
il$
dP
$$
itou,
$f
${
R$<tE
{--f
{
b
d
,f,'
od
@.o
u-J
rffi
xqfitt$r
rHPt
gEH$
EI
Ih
,BS
t6$il$r
I
fGri\Y/fi$fuo
/O\\g/-op
E<*rjv
hz{urrt0tr-
fiuzt-
E*
'J
ififsri$i
r${
fl8$
sil
{f
$
ILo
f
tro
ad)
{{
{
b
d
tI}
rt
ot
c{
s
/O\\v-
.J
AoluIa
nEsl6fi
PT
R$t tL'
Jo
otulfa
SEQr
S6
PT
R$id
t-.r
r$hRbil
t5S
th$r
rHPt
$EB$
Ei
-@
-@
_9 R-,
$i$
zff$
rdq
HdF
o-o|nF
'49gii
E={upi
oE
fiuZL
E
I
ulI
g
BJIL
a
HoI
A
Ho{
oo!tsL
$E
Bi
PT
R{<if
ifi.
l$Eu9lofr<
5:3
sHqN<ir
s&
{J.J
$
IL
fso
Etr)
BI
)-fJ)f
!-o
d
.$'
a$
EI
EI
EI
-@
16'\k/
ILJ
L,rFi*r-luR.ttU
i9Ett$r
rHPt
,fqffx
$fr$$
$R
NEL! G{*z${
3*q
Hd$
Ar,\9^ Ii Y i\v i
o
r6-
}EivIz< llr
,^ \)t{0d
fiuZL
L
F
I
UJL
Rx-J!r_|
I--T-
!fi
lIErr9l
aF{
gRK
crqf
fl{L
f-s'\\e/-
/N\v
| ! 1___-___-u,/
6
!$
ir
gS
rP
SR
oEfi<
boUIq
RI
$i
PE
R(
FEtd
|l_J
Iffilt.d(
;Es
th$r
rHPt
gEB$
EsB$tI{
b
ddo
Ft:o
E$
-@
€-sFu -
Ye
A?F
- ur()z$sC\ ri
;E$
>$55d;ru pP
A r,o\ Q^i Y iv
o
o
.(Il
$
ILo
IL
tro
Ft-
tf|
/G\\e/-
/O\\e/-
o
-@
-16\\{/
o
oo
PI.ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
Monday, March 26, 2001
PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Gommunity Development D,ept. PUBLIC WELCOME
,t
, tt "\,
,
11:00 am .
MEMBERS PRESENT
Diane Golden
Brian Doyon
John Schofield
Doug Cahill
Galen Aaslen
Site Visits :
MEMBERS ABSENT
Chas Bemhardt
12:15 pm
1. Okubo residene;e - 5027 Ule Lane2. Vail Mountain School - 3160 lGlsos Ranch Road3. Tang residence - 185 Forest Road4. Cascade Holel - 1295 Westhaven Drive5. Peters residence - 2955 Bellflower Drive6. Brandess Building -2077 N. Frontage Road
NOTE: lf the PEC headng o<tends until6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinnerfrom 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearinq - Town Gouncil Chambers 2:00 pm
l. A request for variances from Section 12-6D.6 (Setbacks) and Title 14 (Development Standards-
locating required parking in the Right-of-Way), to allow for a residential addition and remodel
located at 2955 Bellflower Dr. / Lot 6, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Alan Peters, represented by Braun AssociatesPlanner: Allison Ochs
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: $0
APPROVED W|TH 2 CONDITIONS:
'1. That prior to final design review approval, the applicant provides a landscape plan whicft
includes provisions to adequately buffer the surface parking area from adjacent
properties.
2. That the applicant submit a revocable righGof-way permit for all improvements located
in the drainage easement and right-of-way prior to submittal of the building permit.
2. A request for a conditional use permil, to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unil (EHU),
located at 185 Forest Road/Lot 26, Block 7, Vail Village 1"'Filing.
Applicant: Oscar Tang, represented by Ray Nielsen, AIAPlannen Ann Kjerulf
MOTION:John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE: 5-0
Driver Brent
o
CONDITION:APPROVED WITH 1
l. Priorto the issuance of a building permit, the Communig Development Department shall
receive proof from the applicant that a Type ll Restrictive Covenant has been recorded
with the Eagle Couniy Clerk and Recorde/s Office, thereby ensuring that the emplolBe
housing unit will be permanently restricted for employee housing.
3. A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit (EHU),
located at 1552 Matterhom Circle/Lot 2. Timber Vail Subdivision.
Applicant: RanchCreekDevelopmentPlannen Bill Gibson
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED W|TH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Tlpe ll EHU deed
restriction to the To,vn of Vail Departmenl of Community Development. This dodJment
shall be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorde/s Office and will require that
the employee housing unit be permanently restricted for employee housing.
2. The Conditional Use Permit for the proposed EHU is contingent upon Design Review
approval.
4. A request for a variance from Section 12-6GO of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a
proposed addition in the rear setback, located at5O27 Ute Lane/Lot 31 , Vail Meadows Filing
1.
Applicant: T. Larry & Renee OkuboPlanner: Bill Gibson
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE: $0
APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That the applicant submit a site'specific Aeological investigalion, completed
by a professional geologist or registered professional engineer, to the Town
for review and approval prior to final Design Review approval.2. That the proposed addition shall comply with Design Standards.
5. A request for a variance from Seclion 12-7D-5 of the Vail Town Code, lo allow for the
addition of mechanical equipment within the required rear setback at the Brandess Building,
located al2Q77 N. Frontage Rd./Lot 39A, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Jayne Brandess lnevocable Trust, represented by Abacus CommunicalionsPlanner Allison Ochs
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 5-0
DENIED
6. A request for a modification to an existing conditional use permit to allovrr for the use of two
modular classroom units at Vail Mountain School, located at 3160 Katsos Ranch Road / Lot
12, Block 2, Vail Village 12'h Filing.
Applicant Vail Mountain SchoolPlanner: Brent Wilson
MOTION:John Schofield SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE: 4-0 (Doyon recused)
APPROVED WITH 4 CONDITIONS:
That both modular classroom units will comply wilh all town design guidelines, be
painted to match the existing school building (beige base with brown trim) and that
additional landscaping for buffering will be added surrounding the new slructure.
These issues are subject to review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review
Board.
lf any revisions are proposed to the existing approved "Phase l" or "Phase ll"
development plans for Vail Mountain School (approved April 24, 2000) prior to the
commencement of construction, the applicant shall retum to the Planning and
Environmental Commission and Design Review Board for review and approval of the
amended development plan.
That the conditional use permit for both temporary siructures shall expire on May 31,
2003. However, if a building permii has not been issued for the construction of the
approved development plan for the school by Jun e 1 , 2OO2, this conditional use
permit will expire on lhat date.
The existing mechanical equipment behind the school must be screened during the
summer of 2001, subject to review and approval by the Town of Vail Design Review
Board.
7. A request for a condilional use permit, to amend an existing condilional use permit, to allow
for one additional Fractional Fee Club unil, located at Vail Mountain Lodge, 352 E. Meadow
Drive/Part of Tract B, Vail Village 1d Filing.
1.
2.
?
4.
Applicant: Braun Associates, Inc.Plannen George Ruther
MOTION: Brian Doyon SECOND: Doug Cahill VOTE:5-0
9.
APPROVED
8. A request for a recommendation to the Town Council on a zoning code lexl amendment to
Section 12-7H-7, (Exterior Alterations or Modifications), to conect an eror in lhe prescribed
procedure for certain types of Design Review applications for properties in the Lionshead
Mixed-Use 'l Zone District.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: George Ruther
MOTION: Doug Cahill SECOND: Brian Doyon VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
A request for a final review of a condilional use permit, io allow for the construction of Phase
I of Donovan Pa* improvements, generally located soulheast of the interseclion of
Matterhom Circle and the South Frontage Road.
Applicant Town of VailPlanner: George Rulher
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 9, 2OO1
A final review of a request for a recommendation to the Town Council for a rezoning from
Agriculture and Open Space to Primary/Secondary Residential and a Minor Subdivision to
create iwo residential lots and a requ€st for a recommendation to lhe Town Council for an
amendment lo the Vail Land Use Plan changing the land use designation from Public/SemF
Public use to Low Density Residential, located at 3160 Booth Falls Road/Part of Lot 12,
Block 2, Vail Village t2th Filing.
10.
tt
Applicant: Boothfalls Homeownefs Association, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: Russell Fonest
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 9, 2OO.l
11. A requesl for a variance from Section 12-7H-10 of the Vail Town Code, to allow for an
proposed addition in lhe rear setback, located at 660 West Lionshead Place/Lot 1, Vail
Lionshead 1" Filing, 1'I Addilion.
Applicant: Lions Square Condo AssociationPlanner: Bill Gibson
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 23,2001
12. A request for a worksession to discuss a proposed special development district to allow for
the construction of a new conference facility/hotel; and a final review of conditional use
permits to allow for the construction of fractional fee unils and Type lll employee housing
units at 13 Vail Road / Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village Filing 2.
Applicant: Doramar Hotels, represenled by the Daymer CorporationPlanner: Brent Wilson
TABLED UNT]L APRIL 23,2001
13. A request for a major amendment to Special Developmenl District #4, to allow for the
conversion of an existing indoor tennis courl to a spa, located at 1295 Westhaven
Drive/Cascade Village.
Applicant L-O Vail Hotel Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs
WITHDRAWN
14. Approval of March 12,2001 minutes
15. Information Update
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planneis office localed at the Town of Vail Community
Devefopment Departmenl, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notificatlon. Please call 47$2356, Telephone for the
Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
c0p-,'
E'i TI'.rl l.r li.rir
Department of Conununity Development
75 Sonth Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
February 2O,2O0l
BELFOR
Tim On, Superintendent
Construction Services
3826 Woodland Park Ave. North
Seattle, WA 98103
.'\*^o"1ftf-
Re: Bondfor landscaping at thc Maniott Hotel in Vail, Colorodo
Dear Tim:
The Town of Vail Community Development Department will allow Belfor's demolition
and construction activities to continue at the Vail Marriott contingent upon receipt of a
bond to ensure that any disturbed landscaping will be restored following the completion
of restoration activities.
The demo plan submitted by Dan Dansby, BELFOR-RMCAT @agle, CO) on December
1", 2000 indicated that 14 trees could potentially be impacted by your firm's activities.
These trees are described as follows:
Numbor Hclght (') Caliper Cl Type
Spruce
SPruce
Spruce3.5' Cottonwood5' Cottonwood
Based on information provided by Mr. Dansby, the estimated cost to replace these trees
would be $23,825. We require a performance bond for 929,781.25 which is l25Yo of this
estimate. It is my understanding that a bond for $30,000.00 will be posted by Travelers
Casualty and Surety Company of America, naming the Town of Vail as the obligee or
3
3
4
2
2
20-24'
18-20'
16'
{p *rn"uo r^ro
o
bcnificirry. This is stisfactory to the Community Dovelopmont DcpErtnont It h aho
ouruldcntrnding that constructior/rcstoration activities will be complotcd by Deccrnbcr,
2001 ro wc agcct th* any di*urbed landscaping will bc restoned priortri }mc 1,2W2.
Ifyou have any quoatione or congorn$ ploase do not hesitatc to contact mc st
4jcnrl&?ci.rnil.co.ur or 970.479.2148.
Sinccrcly,
AnnKjculf t Iplrnna'l
Tonn ofVail
Cc: Drnlhnrby
\r{,q
?\\$tr
-]l
+tl I
F[ r-
rIsl
"x l'l$P
3b v'&r:jffi,t\
\rnV
nn$q
a\o
o
I
s'i-o
\\s
c(
t
\)\R
q\
h\o(q_
q
,lI.i.
V'
.[
rg,
_S1-,",d
{!.
-Y
|lf qr
*
0
s
I
\;,
.l \F*b
.s
E.rb*
,Zrrt*nd
I
e.m;rvreJS
FEg-20-200r 0t:53 FRoTFBRATRUD DEPT,
FROM: Brad Robens
FAX: ?53-759'&68
DATE: FebruarY 20,2001
RE: Belfor USA GrouP, [rc'
COMMENTS:
SincerelY,
BradRobcns, AFSB
Vicchesident
Bramrd Middletorr Instuanc e
CC: TimOrr'Belfor
Cbris Sinclair-Belfor
SUiETYo 253-#s468
o
BRATRUD
MIDDLETON
-
INSURANCE
T-360 P.001/016 t-221
4?0r s, l9u st.
Tacon& wA 98{05
P. O. Box 11205
Tacorur, WA 9841|
253.?59.2200
ftx 253-7s2'8659
F.AX
COMPANY: Townof VaiI ATTN: AnnKjerulf
FAX: 910-479'24-52
PHONE:
E.MAIL:
#OFPAGES:
2s3-7s9-2N
bar@bratnrd.com
4-.
4-
EAbortcr
t00 w. I' ss
P. O. Eor 345
Abcr.tcen, WA 98520
360.532,7580
fsx 360.754-7537
EAuourn
230 Aubs Wry N-
Alburn' WA 98002
253,833.2345
fax !53.931.8167
EDrbDricgc lrura
283 Winslow WaY B.
P. O, Box 10668
Eainbdgc Istand,
wA 981l0
206.842,2566
tu( 206.7E0-0004
EBrcmcron
647 40 St
P. O. Box ?l I
Brtnr.@, WA 98337
360.r?3.2595
frx 360.47E-5961
Dtoetictv
146l BrcdwaY Sr
P. O. Bor 9
l-oqgvicw, wA 98632
360.4133700
fax 360.577'r126
ElotYnPie
315 5n Avc sE
Olynrpiq wA 98501
P. O. Bor 200?
Olynrpiq WA 98507
160,352.76t6
ftx 360.754'7537
DruYeuuP
Ilere is the bond form- I have also included a paropNet on bonding by-the National
Association of So..ty AoJ nnoJ*;. ft's oore orie'nted toward bonding couhacts but
il;;;;;fi-"-il"' foitt. "ao" of surety bonds' Most municipalities prefe'r bonds
tq leners ofcredit or cscrrow accouEts'
Please feel &ee o contact me witb any questioas'
4?ON. Meri.lif,r
P. O, Bot 99t
Purallup, WA 98371
253.848.010r
fsr 253.848.0883
EYrncouvcr
t l818 SE Mill Plain
8rrd., Suite 106
V rcouvct, WA 9E684
360:54.8100
fox 36053.3565
w*w,braEud'com
.FEb-?0-2001 0er53 tR0l+'6ilTtuD SUETYo En.253-r59-6188 T-3r0 F.00enl8 t-221
BOF{D BondNo.
KNOW ALL MEN BY TI{ESE PRESENTT' $at rvc B€ror UqA Group' lnc'
as PrinciPal" and E'elerg
authsizcd o do brusincss ia , a6 Surety, arc beld sud fi:mly boundrmto tottl t of f4!-
as Obligce, in rbc Peost cum Thounnd-qrr!1994:-:j:' )DOIJ-ARS, lnwtulmcrY of
well rnd mrly to be made, we biod orrsclvcs, orr bcirs' erccillor$
Eduri[istragns, successeri md aseigus, jointly and sewr8uy, firdly by these prcsenrs'
WIS|IIE"A,S, Befor USAGrolJp, Inc' - : :'
has rgrced to cosrnrct in trq lgrnllval!
thEfoUowiogiil'.aud rsttol€tr9€5pu$uanttoagreemqtwihtheTqllof'V'9i1 "' _
TlIlS oBLIGATIoN Is stjcg' thot if $e gsid Prbcipal sball
cou$nrcl,orhavcconetr|rde4tbciqrorremcntshcrlhdesodb€daDdsballsaYcthsObligccTl:-T:::tT;co'$nrcl' or navc cio'lrrr r"rLr..
i : mrll aod voi4 o6cn isc to recuia in fult
do'nsgc by rcrsm of irs bilurc n cqlce said work' thco lbis obligados sball h
forcc srd effect'
Sigse4 sceled ud dsradtbis 2Ofl d'ayot , FffiW '2001
ga.le,GEEF rnl
t
.. . -:-
-d{:'----'--..-
i i j- --:-:--
Swanson
'FE6-20-A00| 09:53 FRoll-BilTnUD SURETY oEn. 253-I5e-5{68 -.
T'380 P.003/018 t'221*^*#,gffi
Hrrrfr rd. Conncsi'ilr 061to'90d1
fOWtB oF ATTTOnNEY AI{D CEnnf,tCATE OF AUTflOBIIY oF ATTOINEY(S)FIN-FAC'T
***ji'*ffi##*t
tHffi'T.H'::ffi:ffi ffif iffmr;;tffi H]["rffi3;;'io-ni'n'ur"""!/*'Krrc!
orcseDBi rtralc' con$tlllo a
bwrnsoq KiD fff. v-oo"'il*l"rH'irt'ilt'"'l-n-*rni:';;;;ilil; r' nt'"*'' J'iicutbirth' Tracgv L MG:lGdcv'ilffiils;H*i$'ffiffi;ffi.$'ffi' frffi
and acloowlPdge' $ rEY Pu
ffid$,.-c"i"d6 rffi#ffi* *mffi #ffiilH *"n*f.+ru'mffi
undenating aud lrry SlLl 3ll
sune vcre sig*d b,, * *i,rffifr-"n *r_"r,u" drfrfr;'' fu g"-.m.#-iJ^rrcro"vtt'io'rrrq prnun no rhc
frffi;ti;ff" gtd$ st bctrbv mific't and coufrncd"
Thisappoiuncrrris.msdcudsfoldb,yauhoriryofthcfotlowirusrandingRrsolruronsofsaidCoopades'wbicbRcsolurioosarc
nor tr full forco aIId ctres: *.--_:,- rfi' *rdd4rl aav serior Vicc prcridcor, any Visc hasidcnt' ny
Jffi"*T,5
ard.eserrs to rnt fc -o - frfr ] til t*puov -o *v e*1ffffi* *o *1og1t*
ro signwhhrrc coq*y'. ool;J ilr *ir['Gc-piy3.sealb@ds' rEcocli'anrts' "qy't;;;rtt"*'h orry tinc ntvr"tove uv nrch
. ru nrnrp of r u-+ ,*"fttt";t; oqrditisrat t'nasoling' and any of raid ofrcrrs q lDp For
ffi ilffi ffi ;ffi [:=mm:##ffi Hffi ,rr-*Hr'-ff*m
,rir G"s;dl t arv Pon of tba (hcsoin8, gtrha-ilf q*:-
ffi T ffi
t#;'.: ffi---ffi ' q qgg-qlryLy'-5. -* or r hooa r'*isnizr!?r G " diti'x*r
#;,,;bs,b,u;".ria.,,a;;ffi-ffi ffi h#H'Tffi itffiffiffiLWl]
sa(|id Vice PrcsidBlt 6 |llYmffi, ffiI
'oiil? #*. c-o*v ocrcsr flrsrmr no I ffiium d'l:I
i'. urdcr rnd by utlority _d tbo fo[owiugffi#ffi#ffi;ffiffi 'lr
iil;;; it "- infutl lorcc rad ctrccr:
VOTGD: Thrr 6c sieldNtc of cach of tlc folbninB dliss: Pl"sidelt' -' @' TJT@
IhesidddL rs!'
^ssis.,trt
d ;;ffi; -y s.!*ttrv' nq -fdt*t
gesernrv' std thc *1 o-#;;ffi s;'t*itt c AsaD'v!-ie'Fart tu
cefiEcd hy Juch feeinil' rrglly aurs' rl!'uu't
,ria€[t!fi"c to ueicb it i: attasbexl
.ir
(t.00 Stiltud)
4-_
'FEB-?0-2001 0e:53 FR(FBRATRUO En.
SIATES CONNFCNCUT
)SS. tlutfctl
cornrrvorrwrrono
SUETYo 253-75S-6{58 T-360 P.001/018 F-221
IN WrTIttEss wtEBEO& TIAVEIJIS CASUAL'TY N{D gItBElY.C-glqANY Or '$fi8ICA'' T&rvElXBS
cAsuAlty AlrD su*Er; ififfi;fri;;^uu^ittri-crsuerrfbon-itnt o"vE arscd rhic io'rurcrtr to b!
si,nEd ty rb€ir Scaior Vroc f,n5Ocsr anil Ucir coqpordc ;;; httt; aff""C Uis Ztiit d8y of Norc.bun 2000'
TN^VEIINS CASUAIIY AT{D SUNEtr COMPANY OF
^IGTICA'-' :ffiiBiJns cAsu^LTv lt{D sorrrY coMP- AlcL---' - ffiforcrox a$[t^LrY co![PArlYtu+
GeorggW. Thompson
,rqfr'rnt(--'
Kori M. Johanson
AsfirEant Secnetary, Bond
@@@
or rhis 2thb day of Nsr,€mbcr, 2000 befOrc nc personally carnc GEoRGE lv' TU!-lltP--soN to uc krroc4 wbo', bciry by sr dulv
su/oil. did.lc'o,. erd sry ,olftrlrilf,i-t"l vL. pfuiir""?ifrivrrins CrquAtrv A!{D $nBErY coMPAr{Y or
Atrr't.rcA,, rBAvELExr dfirdtyl$rD ibnnryEiiprxi -u r.rnuurCroN cAsoALIY coMPAt{v' rtc
corporations dcscribcxt i" *o ifri'o.-talfl "t"" i"*tiltilinli n"ltL rtry.* t*rs or'1ia c6poladoo$ tbat tho seelt
afrxcd to tbc said i"srr,rrrra." "rO
cospol|t seabr ard rfiilhc c,,cctilcd rl" oa iosi"--r w bcha-lf drle coqporadou by
;t*dd ttch* on". *roc" rlc Smaiig ncsohnioos ttscof'
Scnior Visc PEsident
4..-
I$lric c. T&crult
CERI1FICAIE
I, tbc udcrsi.dt4 Attisrrt Sccrtrert "f q4q.Ens CASUALTY AND S-IIBETY COMPAI{Y Or AIr|Ef,ICA
TRAVD,LEBS CASUALTy AND SUnEiY C'oltOAI{y; rifrffmox cASU Lrv Cotc, NY' nock corpcatioas sf
i'c Srac otconnccriorr, Do frilff qpUTg,Y $al tu figpl';t't*tn"ar."'*,Jeuotttgv ad ccnitsc of A*lbditv
,uosirs in fu' fo* a"d Las ;t ,.r"t 4 "na
iro11.,ift--ffir-r rhc srandiag Rlsolurio$ d tbc Boardt cf Dltclots' 8s sC[
i*tt t" C b.ttficatc of rurroriry, arc rcw il force'
Sigpcd ald Scalcd al &c Horsc Officc d thc Company, in thc ciry of llartford' Snrc d Corurccriort ps66 65 20tfi rhy of
IEbnarf' ' 2001'
vember I, 1999
ity Development Departrnent
Vail
Road
657
Concem,
Maniott
Southern
Vail Resorts
once it has
ins Vail
Date Receivet
NOV o 3 1g9g
...-...'-.-,.--\^
V^rt R a aorta
Statr
This I
enter
allow
the Town of Vail planning staff that Vail Resorts, Inc. intends to
agreement with Host Marriott, L.P. This agreement will
to the West Day lot in Lionshead, a necessary component
project. Additionally, Vail Resorts will work with the Host
of Vail planning staffto ensure that the landscaping along the
properties is uniform in style and aesthetically pleasing.
will forward a copy of this encroachment agreement to
and signed by both parties. Kindly direct all questions
lvement in this project to Jonathan Greene at845-2629.
President and Chief Operating Officer
q,
o 81658
3038ff800+SENI 8Y:GRIIISHAX/ & HARRINO' PCil1-22.00 ; 3:38PIT ;.,o 8?04?82452it I
Gnrrrsnew & Heanrwo
a PnonlssrolrAl. QoRFon.rSt9NtrronrrrFrs AT I.Awsmtt 4600reltl.s trno9 ol}{rtn '
1700 IJI{C€LX SfREttDllrylt', @toR/tDo eoBog.{5o€
TErrtEsft (go3l c9e.0600
''lloottt8 igogl osc.olgEI.I'AIL
GilbcnF. McNeirh
303.839-3722
gncneirh@grinrbawhaning.cmr
www, grimrhlwbrring,csn
Novrrubcr 22, 2000
Mr. ocorgc Ruthu 4-
Via Facsimite (9?0)-4?9-2452
Town ofVail
Departmart of Comurunity Developmcnt
75 Souttr Frontage Road
VBil, CO 8165?
Re: Vail Mrriott Hotl - Design Rcview Appmvals - Reccnt Fire Damagc
Dcar George:
I an writiag o follow-up my telepbono message to you ycatcrday concerning tho recent firr
danagc to 0re Mffiion Hotcl. Based on thc preli'nbary rcports wtriclr I bavc rcocivd it appears
thlt the hotal sustsinod ecctquiv€ darnagc particularly to the uppcr floors duo to the fire. Becursc
of the nature ud cxtent of thc fire damagc, it also appears thaf substrntial recondruciion of at least
a podion of tho hotol faoility will bc nquircd It is not clear wblt, if ury, impact this situstion f,rd
the wortrcquircd will bavc on the dcsign rcview approvals u,hich wE helped negotiatc last ycr oa
bcbalf of tbe Vail Spa Condominium owne$,
Due to tbe trcertainty of this situation, I hcceby rcquest that you keop ne advised of any
chaqges, sm€Nrdrnents or modifications whioh may bo ftposed to the Marriott's Special
Developmeot Digtiot or to the approved dcsip plans for any ofthe lvlarriott froilities. Plcass Blso
adviscme ofany othcrtownapprovals soughtbyManiottwhiohmay altcrthe approvcddcsignplans
forthe Manion facilities ae approved by tho town oomistedwiththc scttlement agrccmcntbchrccn
Vatl Spa aod the town.
I look forwa,rd to hcadog from you as Marriott frrmulatcs its plans to robuild thc hotcl
facilitiee rcsulting from this unfoltuuate evcnt. Thank you.
sEr{T BY:0RIISHAT 3 HARRIT{0,
U1-22-00
; 3:38Pr ;30383f0+sf01?8lr52i$ 2
Mr.0GorlpB$Sca
Nombc22,2000
Pcao2
OfM/kNd
cci Al llilrcr
LmaHanro
Ot$tlt$llrdil tls?a
{,- - ..
vcty tuly}'ours,
GRIMSHAW&HARRTNG,
4-
{-.
tnrqrx'lb
Qucstions? Cail thc Pliiirning Staliu,47)r-l i23
APPTICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring Dcsigr Rcvicrv approval. Any projcct rcquiring dcsign revicw must
rcccivc Design Rwiew approva.l prior to submitting for a building pcrmit For specific information, see the submittal
rcquircnrorts for thc particular approval that is rcqucsted Thc application cannot bc acceptcd until all thc required
infbrnration is zubmittcd. Thc projcct may also nccd to bc rcviclvcd by thc Town Council and/or thc Planning and
Environnrental Conrmission. Dcsign Rcvierv Board approval cxpircs one ycar after final approval unlcss a
building pcrmit is issued and construction is startcd.
:I0r^JEe, *T Aoee c3. CttB
LOCATTON OF PROpOSAL: LOT: 4,19D BLOCK: I rrr-rNC: VArL tDlSltE*L TltlPD Fltrdh
PHYSICALADDRESS: 1l+ U
PARCEL #: atoro7zo? oo I (Contact Eaglc Co. Asscssors OfEcc at 970-328-8640 for parcel #)
Z9NTNG: €DP +a
NAME OF OWNER(S):
MAILINC ADDRESS:
D..PT 9t8 BETIIE=juI,MD 2ODt1:llcfl pHe11g; 3ol-?go- 2n4
F.
G.
OWNER(S) SIGNATTJRE(S) :
NAMEOFAPPLICANT: CAI,CIC ;DI grN I
MAILINC ADDRESS:DEr\W€F-
PHONE:1+b -1abz
H. TYPE OF REVIEWAND FEE:
E Ncw Construction - $200 Construction of a new buitding
EI Addition $50 lncludcs any adrlition where square footagc is addcd to any rcsidential or
commcrcial building.
tr Minor dtcration - f20 Includcs minor changcs to buildinp and site improvcmcnts. such as,
rcroofing. painting, window additions. Iandscaping. fenccs and reraining
walls, etc.
DRB fees are to be paid at the timc of submittal. Latcr. whqr applying for a building pennit. pleasc identif
thc accurate valuation ofthc project. The Town of Vail will adjustthefeeaccording to theprojectvaluation.
PLEASE SUBMTT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO T}IE
DEPARTMENT OF COIVIMUNITY DEVELOPfoIENT. T5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VATL, COLORADO 8I657.
A.
B.
c.
D.
E.
RUG-24-1999 L?"21 HOST MARRIOTT CORP,3A1 384 6338 P.A2/43
Cell thc Plrnning Sralf rr il79-2138
q$
o
Qucdions?
APPLICATTON FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAi
col|rMlsstoNAtPnovAL
A. TYPEOFAPPLICATIOI\L. O AddfioodcRFA.(250)O BcdnrdBratrttr CmditiultkaPalritO Mrjmr UMhrirSubdiviriqrO ndonheO Sign VrisDcGtr Vrrhnoc[l. ZmingCodcAm@dmart
GENER-{L INFORT{ATTON
rhis 4plication ic fa rny pojcct
lqp.ruing rpproral by thc Plrrning aad Envirumrrrot Commissioo For spcificinfoqmEtio[ rcs thc rubnitd rquircmcats fc the paniqrur ryrcvlt 6ar is rqrrrscd. Thc aplieriur crrn nor bcacctPtcd until rll tt{tdGd iofamtion b submi(ed Thc projm nry atco nea ri Uc rcvicrrca [y rfrc fo.,n Csrurcifend/or thc Dcsigt Rcnicg Bosd
D Amdrrcnilon'AfovEdOcvaopot-t'n-
E EmptsyscttoCnf Unitfipe . )LI Mrir a O Mitor CCI Encdor lltcarioo
(vrilVitbp)D Mrjca tr MinorCC'II BuiorAluerim
(U@!6cad)tr SpccirlDcvclmortD&brtr MajrcflMiirorfrrpnanrar torn SDD
DESCRTPTTON OF THE REQUEST:
c,LocArroN oF pRoposA! : LoT?sllDBLoctLr!_ rn^r.rc vliu Lort
NAME OF OWNER(S):
I\,tAlLINc
oWNERGS)StG:rVl
FH(n.lE
FEE - SEE T}IE ST'BMITTAL REQUIRETVIENTS FOR THE AT"ROPRI,ATE FEE.
SIJEIT{IT THIS APPLICTflOIT, AIJ, SIJEITIITTAL NEQUIRDIIENTS AJ{D IEE TEE TO TEEDEPARTIITENT oF COMMIINIIT DEVELOPMDNT, ?s soulB FR0NTAGE noAD, .vAu,, coLonADO u65?.
&rid6196
Vr
D,
E.
t.
c.NAME OF REP.RESEI{TATIV
IfiTLINGA"DDRE$|:'AvbN.co' E
FwPanor flll&. -Ct#:-By, fu. -
quJsf Cail thc Ptanning Stalf at 479-2138
PLICATION FOR PLANNING AND ENVIROIYMENTAL
COMMISSION APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
lhis application is for any project reguiring approrat by tlre Planning and Environmcntal Commission. For spccific
information. scc the stbmittal rcquircrncnb for thc particular approval rh4 is rcqucstcd Thc ryplication can not bc
acccptcd until all rcquired information is submitcd" The projcct may also nccd to bc rcvicwed by thc Toun Council
tr Ameadmcnt to m'Approvcd Dwclopmcot Plan
tr Ernploycc Housing Unit (fpc:
tr Major or tr Minor CCI Exterior Alteration
(Vail Villagc)tr Major or E Minor CCtr F,xtcriorAltcrartion
(Lionshcad)
tr Spccial DcvclopmcntDistrict
tr Major orflMinq Amcndrncnt to an SDD
B.DESCRIPTION OF TIIE REQT.]EST:
c.LocArIoN oF pRoposAr.: LorZLlgDBLocK__l__ p6n{6 VA\ru ho^ts*e1$ -lFreb Fiu
o
AP
andlorthc Dcsigr Rwiow Bord"
A. TYPEOFAPPLICATION:
E Additional GR.FA (250)
tr BcdandBrcatdart
tr Conditional Usc Pcrmit
tr Major or El Minor Subdivision
tr R&oning
tr Sigr Variance
tl Variance
n ZoningC,odcAmcndment
ADDRESS: 1I+ UO{5HAb EJRTE BUILDINGNAME: VAIL MIRerdiT I..4r. I
D. ZONING:
NAMEOF OWNER(S):
MAILING
F.
G.
owNER(S) STGNATTIRE(S):
NAME OF REPRESENTA Crttxr Mrsrsor.l Fe:sr €5r
vuo$E- 14b- Eb?-
FEE - SEE THE STJBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRIATE FEE.
SI'BMIT TIIIS APPLICd,TION, ALL SIJBMITTAL REQIJIREMENTS AND TIIE F'EE TO TEE
DEPARIMENT OF COMMIJNITY DEVELOPMENT, T5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, ,vaIL cr)r..)D ar!n tf dct
MAILINC ADDRESS:
v.{L, coLoRADO 91657.
o
oQa
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colora.do 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
October 7, 1999
Chuck Madison
East-West Partners
P.O. Drawer 2770
Avon, Colorado 81620
Fax: 845-'1205
Re: MarriottRedeveiopmenthoposal
Dear Chuck,
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with written documentation with regard to the Mariott Redevelopment
proposal.
As you are aware, the Vail Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999, amending Special
Development District No. 7, Through the adoption of the amending ordinance the Town has granted its approval of
the hotel redevelopment project.
The next step in the development review process prior to applyjng for a building permit is final Desigr Rwiew
Board approval. The Desip Review Board has already granted a conceptuai approval ofthe major planning and
desigt aspects of the proposal. The only remaining issues to be reviewed and approved by the Board are the
architectural design details (exterior materials, applications, door/window trim, colors, etc.).
Ifyou have any questions or concems with regard to the information addressed in this letter, please do not hesitate to
call me. You can reach me by telephone a1970479-2145.
Sincerelv.
R,'U*'r
Senior Special Projects Planner
Town of Vail
Creorge Ruther, AICP
{p*"uo"o
SEI{T BY:GRITSHAfl I HARNIilO' PC;IO- 1.88 i 2:38PT io
Pur*
Philip M, Quabochi
PMQ/robcc: Chrrok lfadicon (vie fax number (90) S45.720j)
Cnofp Rrrt€r (via fix nunbcr (glO)' +lg"Z+SZ)-
Al & Lonua l{ucr (vla ftx numirct
-gtO1+tA-iS+ey
,r
30353800{
Glnncssrw & Il.lnrnse
.A PBOtlEtalqNA! oorPoR rFtt tfA|rIUBITE E T I"AWglrrT! !!oo"*#.ffiffi*"
tU:EPEOll! gOO 8lDteOOaELEOO)EE. 6ost orD€ssaS.I]^IL y^nro,ara.rlt_t r^F?,rr.roE
philb M eurroahi
(303) r3$,3r3t . Wl@Sdmrluw}rldturo
hg/A*vwgdff h$vtlrla&oon
Octobcr I, 1999
Tom Moorhcrd
Torva AtlomcyTovmofVrff FrrNumbor(970)479-Z$7 r'
?5 S. Fronrrgo Rord
Vril, Colordo E1657
Rc: ordinanco No. 10, scrios of 1999, emeuding thc Maniod's spoclrt lhvclopmcotDbfiiotNo.7
DcrrTua:
I
. Ttpd, pu-fur your lotrcr of thir rfuraoon confrrning thc fiual approval of &e adminr6rtivcrmendnmt b tto lvhniqt'r sDD. Enctoscd is c copy of tlc-Noticc orDigmisut t filcd thi,aftcrnoon with tho Erglc coudy oorut. If you havc'ory quecioor, pt.a* mciilo to oafl mc.
Vcrytulyprrr,
GRIMSHAW&HANruNq
A?rofcsiond Corpmtim
s?01?82452;S I
Offce of the Town Attorney
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2 I 07/Fax 970-479-2 I 57
Re:
October 1,1999
Gilbert F. McNeish, Esquire
Grimshaw & Haning, P.C.
1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 3800
Denver, CO 80203-4538
SDD #7
Dear Gil:
The Community Development staff, upon receipt of an application for a minor amendment to SDD
#7, approved that minor amendment.
This staffapproval was considered by the Planning & Environmental Commission dwing the course
of its regular meeting on Monday, September 27,Iggg. Upon explanation and understanding the
Planning & Environmental commission, by motion upheld the staff approval.
On Tuesday, September 28, l999,this action of the Planning & Environmental Commission was
considered by the Vail Town Council in the course of the Planning & Environmental Com:nission
report. It is at the time of reporting Planning & Environmental Comrnission to the Vail Town
Council at its ne)'it regular meeting that the Town Council does have the opportunity to call up any
item with which it has concem or issue This item was not called up by th; Vail Town Council ani
it registered no concerns in regard to the staff approval. Therefore, these minor amendments have
been approved and are part ofthe approved development plan.
The only review remaining is for the Design Review Board at some point in the future to consider
the entire project of which these amendments are included. The project does require final Design
Review Board approval. Thank you for your cooperation in resolving these issues.
yolus,
R. Thomas Moorhead
Town Attorney
RTM/arv
xc: George Ruther /
Chuck Madison
{j *r"rrr"o r.,rr*
o
RECEIVED OCT '4 19S
DTSTRICT COURT, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADOCase No . 99 CV 4l_1
NOTfCE OF DISI'ffSSAIJ PURSUA]IT TO RUIrE 41(a), C.R.C.P.
VAIL SPA CONDOMINrW ASSOCTATION,
Dal. i I i.'rnar
THE To$lN oF vArL, coLoRADo; THE TowN couNcrl oF THE ToI,vN oF vArL,COLORADO; ROBERT ARMOUR, MICHAEL. ARNETT, KEVIN FOLEY, MICHAEL,JEwrrr, LItDwrG KuRz, and SYBTLL NAVAS, as present members of theTown council of the Town of vair, cororado,. and RoBERT FORD, asMayor of the Town of Vail, colorado and present member of theTown Council of the Town of Vai1, Colora-do
Respondents.
coMES Now the Petitioner, vair spa condominium Associat.ion,through counsel, Grimshaw & Harrj-ng, p.C., and pursuant to RuIe41(a) (1), C.R.C.P., hereby dismisses its action against. allRespondenE.s, !,rit.h pre j udice .
DATED this 1st day of October, L999.
RespecEfully submitted
GRIMSHAW & IIARjBING, P. C.
PLAfu'ir--
Ronald L. Fano, No. 20797Philip M. Quatrochi, No. 27973
1700 Lincoln StreeE, SuiEe 3800
Denver, Colorado 80203Telephone: (303) 839-3800
ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER VAIL SPA
CONDOMINTUM ASSOCTATION
Cert:lficate of Service
-I hereby certify that f served, a E,rue and correct copy of!h9 {ofgoing-Notice-of Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a),
9..R..C.P.,.!y depositing_t,he same, postage prepaid, in the UnitedSEates mail, to the following:
Tom Moorehead
Town of Vail Attorney75 S. Froatage RoadVail, Colorado gl6s?
!r
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Department of Community Development
September 2T, 1999
A request for a final review of a minor amendment to Special Development
District No. 7, Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail to allow for a reduction in the
height of the elevator tower on the Gore Creek Club Building, to reduce the height
and design of the approved landmark feature, and to incorporate a new
pedestrian walkway into the development plan, located at 714 West Lionshead
Circle/Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3'o Filing and Lots C & D, Morcus
Subdivision.
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by Gwathmey, Pratt
& Schultz Architects. P.C.Planner: George Ruther
l.@
The applicant, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by Henry Pratt of Gwathmey, Pratt
& Schultz Architects, is proposing a minor amendment to Special Development District No. 7,
Marrion's Mountain Resort at Vail. The major amendment is intended to facilitate the
redevelopment and remodel of the existing Marriott Hotel and the construction of the new Gore
Creek Club. The minor amendment will amend three aspects of the development plan approved
by the Vail Town Council on July 20, 1999.
The amendments to the approved development plan include:
r a reduction in the overall building height ol the elevator tower on the northwest corner of the
Gore Creek Club,. a reduction in the height and a change to the design of the landmark feature atop the existing
hotel, andr the construction of a new pedestrian walkway between the existing hotel and the existing
parking structure to connect the sidewalk along West Lionshead Circle to the streamwalk
located south of the development site.
with the exception of the three changes described above, all other aspects of the approved
development plan and conditions of the July 20, 1999 approval remain unchanged.
II. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Communitv Development Department:
The Community Development Department staff shall review and approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the proposal and then report the decision to the PEC at a regularly
scheduled meeting.
F:b\r€ryonets€cvnarn6\99v\rrriom2
1
Plannino and Envlronmental Commission:
The PEC is informed of the staff approval and may call-up item for additional review as it
deems necessary.
Town Gouncil:
Actions of DHB or PEC maybe appealed to the Town Council or maybe called up for
review by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the PEC or DRB
erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the
board's decision.
III. THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MINOR AMENDMENT PROCESS
Chapter 12-9 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code provides for the amendment of existing Special
Development Districts in the Town of Vail. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose of a
Special Development District is,
nTo encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land, in order to
promote lts most approptiatg uss; to improve the design character and quality of
the new development withln the Town; to facllitate the adequate and economical
provlsion of streets and utllities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of opsn
space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated In the Vail
Gomprehensive Plan. An approved development plan for a Special Development
District, in coniunction with the properties underlying zone district, shall establlsh
the regulrements tor guiding development and uses of property included In the
Speclal Dovelopment Distrlct."
According to Section 12-9A-2, a minor amendment to a Special Development District is defined
as,
Modificatlons to building plan, site or landscape plans that do not alter the basic
intsnt and character of the approved Special D,evelopment District, and are
consistent with the design critoria of this chapter. Minor amendments may include,
but not be limited to, yariations of not more than 5' (five feet) to approve setbacks
and/or building footprints; changes to landscapo or site plans that do not adversely
impact pedestrian or vehicular circulation throughout the specialdevelopment; or
changes to Gross Residential Floor Area (excluding resldential uses) of not more
than 5% (five percent) of the approved square footage ol retail, office, common
areas and other non-residentaal floor area, except as provided under Sections 12-15-
4 or 12-15-5 of this Tltle.
The Municipal Gode provides a framework for a minor amendment of an established Special
Development District. According to the Municipal Code,
"mlnor modiflcations consistent with the design criteria outlined in sub'Section 12-
9a-2 of the Zonlng Rogulatlons, may be approved by the Department ot Community
Development. All minor modifications shall be indicated on a completely revlsed
deyslopmsnt plan. Approved changes shall be noted, slgned, dated and flled by the
Department of Community Development."
F:b\,sfne\p€cvn€rnos\99wanidl2
^
The Municipal Code provides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in
evaluating the merits of the proposed major amendment to a Special Development District. lt
shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed
development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more
of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been
achieved. The staff has addressed each of the nine SDD review criteria. Upon consideration of
the nine SDD review criteria staft finds that the changes proposed by the minor amendment are
consistent with the design criteria and that the changes do not alter the basic intent or character
of the sDD.
IV. STAFF ACTION
The Community Development Department approves the applicant's request for a minor
amendment to Special Development District #7, Marriott, to allow for redevelopment of the
existing hotel and the new construction of the Gore Creek Club. Staff's approval is based upon
the review of the criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations.
o
Rob LEvinc
Antlcrs Assosiation
680 W. Lionshead Circlc.
Vail, Colorado 81657
Geofr€y Wright, Dcstination Resorb
Fnzian Associaltign
610 W. Lionshead Circle, VaiI, Colorado 81657
DbwaMcKma
LionSquaeNorth
660'lV. Lionshcad Pl.
Vail Colorado 81657
Montmeros Association
Atb: Dawn
641 W. Lionshead Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
LemaHaus€tr
Vail Spa Association
710 W. Lionshead Circle
Vail" Colomdo 81657
Vail Corrporation
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Coloradb 81658
Thc Town ofVail' 74 SouthFmntagc Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
o
ADJACENT LA,I\DOWNERS
il. ,r.r MAY AFFEcr ror, ,rorrt
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the
Town of Vail on September 27,1999, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. ln
consideration ol:
A request lor a final review for amendments to Title 12, Zoning with respect to Employee
Housing Unit Standards, Minimum Lot Size Requirement in the Primary/Secondary and Two-
Family ResidentialZone Districts and Site Coverage Standards.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Maurietlo
A request for a worksession to discuss the findings and recommendations of the Town of Vail's
1999 Parking Study.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Brent Wilson
A request for a minor amendment to the Maniott SDD, located at 714 Lionshead Circle; Lots
4,7,C,D, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3'o Filing.
Applicant: Chuck Madison, East West PartnersPlanner: George Ruther
A request for a minor subdivision, to vacate common lot lines to create a new lot, located at
2477,2485,2487,2497 Garmisch Drive/ Lots 1-4, Block H, Vail Das Schone #2.
Applicant: Town of Vail, represented by Nina TimmPlanner: Allison Ochs
A request for a conditional use permit, to allow for the operation of a bed and breakfast, located
at 1987 West Circle Drive / Lot 26, Butfehr Creek.
Applicant; Jeanine EricksonPlanner: Brent Wilson
A request for a worksession to begin preliminary discussions with regard to the proposed
rbdevelopment of the Vail Village Inn, Phase lV, located within Special Development District No.
6.
Applicant: Daymer Corporation, represented by Jay PetersonPlanner: George Ruther
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call479'
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published September 10, 1999 in the VailTrail.
FI'I
HOST MARRItrTT
September 10, 1999
Mr. George Ruther
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Community Development
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Vail Marriott Mountain Resort
Dear Mr. Ruther:
Pursuant to your earlier request to Mr. Chuck Madison, enclosed please find a copy of a
Certificate of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware confirming the
December 16, 1998 merger of HMH Properties, Inc. into Host Marriott, L.P. Host Marriott, L.P.
is the surviving entity and the owner of the Vail Maniott Mountain Resort. The general partner
of Host Marriott, L.P. is Host Marriott Corporation, a Maryland corporation.
Please do not hesitate to contact me directly with any further questions that may arise.
Sincerely,
fu,.+12
L. Ehrlich
Encl.
cc: Chuck Madison
JeffMegrue
Tom Moorehead, Esq.
KAREN L. EHRLISH
AAAOOIATE GENERAL COIJ NSEL
BETHE6oa, MD 2OBl?-r lO9 3Or-3EtO'?475 F^x 3Ot'3EO_63321o4clc) F€FNwooo Roao, oEPT. 923
State of Delau,ate
r, EDWARD t. rnEE!, sEcREtARy oF srArE OF rEE SrArE or
DEI'aI|aRE, Do BEREBY cER'rrar rEE agEAcsED rs A TRUE AlrD coRREcr
copy ot tEE CERIITFICAIE OF MERGER, rfErcE MERGES:
XEME PROPERJITES, INC.X, A DEI.AWARE CORPORtrTION,
s?rrE 'AIID rNlo xEosr l[ARRrorr, r,.p. " ulfDER TEE NAITIE oF .BosE
IIARRTOTT, L.P.
"
.N, I''{''ED PAR:INERSETP ORGA}IIZED AND ETISTING
ITNDER TBE r'Aws oF TEE srerE oF DELAT|aRE, As RECETVED .BND FTTJED
IN TEIS OFFTCE TEE SIXTEENTE DAY OF DECEMBER, A.D. 1998, AT 9
o' cLocK A.M.
A FTIED COPY OF TEIS CERTIFIC**E EAS BEEN FORT{ARDED IO TEE
NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDBR OF DEEDS.
Office of tlrc Secretary of State pAcE 1
r ! -T;-l:\;-f Ir- . -i'1 .
9466426
12-16-98
2885265 8100M
981485413
SITITE OF D':,*XAR:E
sICRE?ARY OF STATZDMSION Of C9RFRA"totts
EZLED 09: OO N, 72,/16./7998
987e854r3 - 2e85265
CERTITICATE OF }IERGEB
OF
EMII PBOPENTIES,INC.
INTC}
EOST MABRIOTT, LP.
hrrsusrt to section 263 of the Delawa'e General corporatioa Law o"d
sectiron 17-211 of the Delaware Rovin€d Unifrrm Liait€d partuerehip Act, Hostlilarriott, LP., a limit€d partnership organized anil exieting under the taw of the
Stete of Delaware (the "Linited Partnemhip), does hereby certi& to th€ following
facts relating to th€ msrgsr (the "Ivlerget') of HMH Pmperties,
-Inc., a Delaware
co4roration (.mtll Prupertiee"), in0o ths Limited Partuerebip:
FIRfyT: thst tbs na.me and stste of incoqporation or bmation of eacb
oonstitueut entity that is a pa*y to the I\ferger ie ae frllowe:
Name
I{ost lferriott, L.P.
HMH Propertiee, Inc.
State of Inconroration or Formation
Delaware
Delaware
SE@ND: t'bat an Agreement of Merger hae been epproved and exeorted byHMII Properties ard the Liniteal Pamerahip in amrdance with Section 26S(c) ofthe Dclaware Gen€ral co4loration Law and section r?-zlr(c) of the nelaware
Revis€d Uni$m Linited Partuership Act.
TIIIRD: tbat the name of the gurvivirg entiw ehsll be "Host Marriott, Lp."
FOURTI* that the partnersbip agreement 6f f[s T.irnit€d Partnsrehip as in
efrect on the date of thie Certificate eball be the par*nership agreement of tbe
snwiving entity.
FrFIrt that the Merger shqll b€ efiective ae of E:fi) p.n. Eaeten standard
Time onl)ecember 16, 1998.
SIKII* that thp Agreement of Merget ig on fitre at the place of business of
the eundving entity at the bilowiug addrces:
Host Maniott, L.P.
10400 Ferawood Road
Betheeda, MD 20912
sEVEI'ITH: that a copy of the Ageement of l\[erger will be furniehed by theLinited Partnership, oD request and without cos! to any partner of the f,iraitca
Partnership or any etoc&holder of HMH properties.
\\\E - aaDar{.. e'|||a?a
INW[II{E8S WHEBEOF, Hoet lfiarriott I^P. hns oaurd tbir Gctificate of
!fi€stEt to bo rtnly enalted ar of +hi+ /{ffday of Deerber, 1998.
HOgf,MABilO{T, LP.
By: EMCREALE8IATS LI€,
2'
G.lbnnnd
\\\DO -Irrl.arnrta
: Mr.GilbertF Mcl'leish
PlroNE tlo. | 97@ 476 5S4A
l.l'l
HOST MARRIOTT
corr.anallci'
Scptember l, 1999
of tle
Sep. 21 L999 ?,2t19Pl'l P2
that
o
Grimshaw&Haning
1700 Lincoln Steet, Suitc 3800
Denv6, CO E0203
Re:ordinanccNo.l0,seriesoflggg,AmendingMa.rriottSpocialDwelorpment
DissictNo. 7
DearN(r. McNeish:
This lener is ioteddcd to formalizc the agreeocnt bctween Vail Spa Coodominium
Association ("Vail Spa ) asJ n*t latttiott, L'P-' ("HMc) that was rcached last weok
Agrce@cnt
1' HMC agrecs to promptiy stibmit and diligerrtly pr:rsug in-good faith' an
applicatio,n to tne ro.rn oivait" .-"ia Special Development District No. 7, lvlarriott s
Mormtain Resort at Vail, which reflects thclbaagcs illustatcd on thc attached Exhibit A and qct
fodh in this agreerneot. HMC alrd the vail spa agroc that the changes set forth in the ettached
Exhibit A and this agreqn€nt rJo not altcr the-basic intent and character of Spocial Devclopmcnt
Diseict No. 7 ad are consistcnt with thc dcsip critcria set forth in cbaptcr 9 of the Town of
vuLT-owngRegulatiorrs.HMCagrccsthatitsapplicationsh|lb3.{.'lthcfirrmofaminor
amennmenito a Spccial DevelopJ*t Dittti"t as set forth in Section i2-9A of the Town of Vail
Zoning Regulations.
. . Z. Witb rcspect to the modificatioq of the pyramid stnrcture on Page I of Exhibit A
HMC agreos that tbo aneodmeat application shall rcduce the height and mass of the pyremid
stortrr" as gencrally rcflected on gxltiUit A It is intcadcd thar this amendment will causc the
. heght of the pyra-iA structure to be lowered by 7 fee! thercby resulting in an overall reduction
iE rnass of thi pl,ramid stnrcture of approximately l}Yo. HMC asees that its application will
include conditiqns tlat there sball be no flag poles, flags, pennants, wires, towers, antcnnas' or
or cxtcrrsions of any kind anached tio
attachmeots arc
^r I <oNe>cHrllto?Hrr E- TawBlcx9 ,^., t\*acn.ci vraa t.sStcErar, gdis.^r Caur.SEL arC Ccttol"' 3Eclsl
ro.oo ttriroco tc^o, osrt. tzt oS"raao^. r'0 tottt'r toc !ol't'o'?17' t'r t't'r'o-tt"
lrat!aNE i Brltlato't3''?oYr'a:xo@re||rtow'ccr
owanid structtuc.
oo
n , /Arq".r I Qompteriod vrloRa
A @6'-ro foll oft-sil€ inprutenu=
L\VE> 7ol4;. (,rlt,qq.t=
OV r.r[ €lebnours ' Liue .F \errr=
A.(t Rfte Cod.e.+s. w*Jsr *, A Fre,,,l 3t*ta",aeqr
'KNq-L \a!r ouere '
ChncJie'-
5h,nrs g6D
?\R*"?u'D 4(J€,LtE4r'-
w)L €rait r&+ Co^rc>o.
Der$,t {?re 4.rr-,D6 retg'z-t*;o.l
Pct;rle, (-och-epre he,,qU liw$e @
DertAnl
August 30, 1999
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Marriott SDD minor amendment
Dear George:
Pursuant to our pre-application conference last week, please find attached applications to the
PEC and DRB for a minor amendment to the recently approved Marriott SDD. As we told
you last week, the reason for making these changes is to respond to some outstanding
issues presented to us by the owners ol the Vail Spa.
The changes we are making are as follow:
1. Lower landmark element approximately 7' by making it 8'-6" narrower at the
base (north south directionl. This also requires some minor changes to the
dormers and windows on the east and west sides. This change also is
responsive to comments made at the DRB and the Town Council concerning the
height of the landmark element atop Phase 2.
Add a concrete sidewalk on the east side of the alley between existing Phase 2a
and the parking structure to the west. This walk will be unheated colored
concrete and will connect the street sidewalk along Lionshead Circle with our
proposed path to the bike path along the stream. This new section of walk
should be ADA compliant since the existing grade appears to have a slope of
approximately 1:15.
Lower the north elevator tower at the Gore Creek Club by approximately 3'-0".
All along I have maintained that the height of this element is based on the
overhead requirements for the elevators. lt appears that by moving the elevator
equipment room to a position below the elevators we can reduce the overhead
requirements by about 3'.
2.
3,
George Ruther- SDD minor modification request
August 30, 1999
Page 2
4. We need to add two conditions to the Development Plans for this SDD. First,
that there shall be no flag poles, flags, pennants, wires, towers, antennas. or any
other structures or extensions of any kind attached to any part of the landmark
roof element atop the Phase 2 building or the north elevator tower of the Gore
Creek Club, irrespective of whether such attachments are temporary or
permanent in nature. Secondly, that there shall be no exterior lighting of or on
the landmark roof element atop the Phase 2 building or the north elevator tower
of the Gore Creek Club.
Per our discussion last week, we are re-submitting only the drawings that are affected by
these changes and an updated list of adjacent property owners. lt is our understanding that
no other submittal items are necessary at this time in order to have a complete submittal. I
am also including a check for the combined fees of $22O.O0
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
HRP
Enclosures
GWATHMEY P
r\, Iav
Re: orrdinupo No. 10, sertcs of 1999, Ancoding tho Mario6'r special DcvolopnmtDistiotNo. T
Ilcar Tom:
Thir ldat ir to cmftLru thoggtrils of our cooveruetion ofthis mcrring. Today ttc Vall Spacottdomlnium Arcoolrtion will tc filing a Ruri loo
"onopr.iot
og.inrttlo f&r orv"il aod thcTo*a,counsil rcgrrding{re paurgc "ioaiir** ilo. t ir, scricior t lca. H;vo,, ir is ourintcntion and undcntrndingUrar auagrccnrcntwiu tc rcacmawith0.oMsnio'ttrtor"UytoMrniott willgp.ly o tho fovm rc nio.roin ac.it "!** r.oo to ticilioprr.otpr"rnoontainod in ffii** No:_Ll rt ir ow ruaonunafri th.r-e. i"rig" "dgrJ iur uc proconco rnoapprovod rdninistrrdvcly prunrmr to rhc town coacirvair. emilin! a-rormi t8llcmcDt irnachcd with tbc uaniod rrgodingrtrc spocinc chonscs to te mrao o tFc aovJoprrrcot plrnr, rndareuning $o c'hru&c.rt a!trovoii-bytri rown,lt iiorn intenrion b dismi$ the Rrdc 106 cctloooncc ttc chagcs to tho dcveiopmcntitu Uccomc of""tiw
. TheFftrc, rc will uot be ccrring thc Rulc 106 comptaiut on rho Town st this rimo lo ttd thctimc dcadlinor in thc Rule f ytl+ F t*' livou-rr". g-y 9'crtionr or if rny ofmy rtarcnrcnrtoin this lcttcr trt inconcog ptcnsc oontact mo rr oom u posribio.'
Fffiry#
GnnrsElw & Ilennnsa
A PROIIUSTOIIIIJ COEPSTI.ATIIONAT!rOxl{I!?! ,ll'f' I/rwallttrE aaor'looliDrcor.,x enEolTDDrv4. oor.o8ADo| rotodr.rot
r!E!P8()!1! 6@ toDsS@!4EIEOPEE 60asll!0tttr'ltra& suErtrrtrqgorqr.Bn ar',.lE
AuEust 19, 1999
Frr Nubcr (90)479-2tSl
Vcrytrulyyorur,
GRIMSHA}\' A HARRINC,
pn@3rlnrhuhlrrl4:cr
trtp/twrw.grir!&!u,brrb&om
iruloJgiilruu'+biu4lc2+52i* 2
fhilfu}t Qurtroctri
(303) t3e.3t33
TonMoorhcad
TorrnAttomcy
TwnofVail
75 S. Frqrtrye Rod
Vail, Colondo 81657
Philip M. Qrurochi
PMQ/aobcc: ChuckMadirou(via-fornumbcr (mO>g4S-nO|')
$qrgJ R"tq (vio frx numbor (970)'47s&4sz)'
At & Loraa l{arrar (vle fan rnrmbcr (gZO) +ZcjS+S)
SENT BY:(iRITSHAW E HARRING,8-1S-0S ; 3:43Pt ;PCi
o
8?01?82452;S 2
Itnoo?irh@gdErhawbrrring.con
htgJ/www. grhrhawhrniqg.corrr
Gilbqt F. McNciltt
(303) 839-3rz
3038393800{
GlnnasaAw & ILnnuvol Pn[rt!!6c[oilr r. @nFon lloNl'ryFOnNIfi.||Ft/AW
SUEIE ltroo
1t00 L,INq)r/N glnET
DDfigrll. @L('n DO toto{6rs
tlrr+pEoN! €t o allato
TEJO@PITE B@t8&TSCSillAIIj crr^rrrrs[carw.D|llr!\.tt!,nrl
Augrtst 19, 1999
YIA ITLEFAX
9fl1-t4r'.7l05
Mr. Chrcl ldadison
East West Part|crs
100 E, Thomas Place
P.O. Ihawer 2770
Avon, CO 81620
Re: Manlott Hotel - Town of Vail Ordinancc No. l0 1999 ' Sottlcnrent Diccuesioru
Deor Chuck:
I ut writing to confim otu rccmt disougsions and undcrstanding oonccrning &e
abovc-captioaod mattcr. You povidcd t0 mc on Augrut 17,lggg tbree graphic docunrents
cotrccrning ptroPoscd cbangce that Marriot ie wiling to make to ib desi& otttc tro'tel
rcnovation and thc ncw Gore Qeck club builditrg. Tbcsc cbanges were proposed by yor to
our clicnf, Vail Sps, in rcspons to our culier mqtEst for additioal moaincadons ti 0r
dorign as approvod by the Towa.
Initially, we ware hopsful o resolve fis rnatter prlor to our dcadline b inidate
litigation conccrniag thesc issrrcs agaiust thc Torm of vail; howencr, we wgre not abla to
formally Tg"l-,tdc ttrat agrecmcot by oday. Thcreforq as you hrvo bcco advised by scparatcletb, wt filcd oru complafurt today against tbc Towu of Vait with thc Eagle Coguty piitist
Court NcvcrthslcsE lve brve discusscd and mrrtualty uudamrrd thar we arc noviig forward
in good feith lo resolve our disagrecmcnt concerning thcsc dcsiga issuc$ In this regad, wc
haw advircd you tlut orrr olient has agr€ed in ooucept !o tbe proposcd cbangoe t"niih Vo"
havc suggcstod subjcct to aertaiu refinements as digsussed. whm wo complcle oru
igr€egtcnt, thcso c'bagcs wiU bc prcscnld by l{criott o thc Town and approvcd ac au
adtrdnirtativc ancndmenrt
Thfu lettcc shall scrvc as a confrmation of orrr undcstanding rcgarding tho design
changes. And, you aad I hsvc agrccd that I will prepan a lcthr to-Idriott utoogtr yo"
which forually incorposaics thc agrced upon obangC ui&ic,h you san thGo use as fbosb fs
your applicatiou to aorcnd with the Town. Thrnk you.
SEI{T 8Y:ORIIS}IAT & HARRIT{0'
Mr. Chuck ltdadiroo
Argutt 19, 1999
Ptge 2
3038393800+
Vcry tiuly youn,
GRIMSHAW & ITARRINO,
s?01?82452;$ 38-1 S-9S ; 3:43Pll iPCi
o
f norgdeg*$rpuauon
tril WtuA
. Gilbcrt F, McNIGish
GFlvfhnv
*, S &_I:oTp Husr (viatelcfax - (n1r476-5s48)
Ton lvloorbcad (via tclcfar . (970)479-ZtS7)
Goorgc Ruthc (vb blcfa( - (970)4t9-US2i
SENT 8Y:ORIT$HAI E HAHRING,8-10-s9 ; 4:43Pil ;9?01?S2152;* 2
pcoobh@grltarbrwhaniag.co
htp:/A*vrr. griorhrnrherringcog
PCi
o
3038383800+
Gllblrt P. Mc.Ncirb
(303) t3FsTZ
ChIc& Madism
EaS WcstPrltFss
lm Ea$ Thmes Phcc
Drswpr 270
Vail, Colorado t1620
Gnnrsgaw lb l{rnnnyo
a PnoItlssmIAIJ oorFlona|FloH
AIEIojIITTYE r'|! LATsulIn 8|o0
1t00 l/tt{@rfi EtrRrrtp)Efll]i. oou)raDo soror{rsr
lnar/rP.E0ltl mtts8lOSUircOEuB6Stt!e$IEIA& qtdrcrtr^rftcavEDr|llJ!!!.lttrl
Aryust 16, 1999
Fu lo. $U8i|S-T?IS
Rc: Vcil Nilrse No. 10,{nendiqg thc Manioc'e SDD
Derr Chr;k:
_ ^f+ you for your phonc call fis afternoon rcgardi4g our lcfter to you da6il August
13' 1999. we rppecirE yor willingnerc to sodirue o aiccruss a mrfrnllyroccptablc
ttsohtion to_tlc Vail Spa Condoninium Acsrchdm'e corrcErll rcguding [hE dssigp fffi ths
Gnovation of thc cxirthg ltfisnioc hildiqgr rDd ttrg cusrtuctioq ortbc lo* Gorc-ctrEc&
Club.
Altough tb Vril Spa betlcver that thcr! rrc scveral repecls of tbe dcsfn 6rt arr
ctill prohlcortic, we havc dccirlcd ro focus on tho arcas of grcitot coDcorn in 6c nope or
rElchfug a compronire gn,wFt we perceive to be ths dec@ faatrlrr with thc largcri
ugEtivc iryact m tbe Vdl Spr.
Tlvo pdnry concoIilr $mdn wifr ruspect to thg corc crce,k oub: l) rhc blockiry
of vail spe vlcwr !y &F Dorth facsde of thp Gore cleck club, and 2) thc hci of rn opeu
Pdcstim corctlon ftron Wost Lionrberd Circle to rbc bikc patn bctweco thc Oore C-rce[
gtrb_qd tb exisdqg Irilaniott hildiqg. We d b satr E grcibr mcppi4g-bffI of the nortb
rlctau ! or{er to niligrto tle ibpsct of ttc ncw cuucEra on ttc veii-spi'r vicwr, rnd we
flP fq b_ccc e ryaryigo of the aree bctrveen tbc Gorc CrGe& Clr$ uA tbe cftdlg
Mrnimt go fut al inviti4g md fuatidrrl pcdedrim cooncctioo is ctcatcd from wertLimrhd Circlc to the bib p|ftr sd tb crcel.
With ll8Pet to Oc desigp for thc runovrtion of the cd$ing Msrriot, ou prinary
colpstl r€udnl the Ew p"randd hlllnftt fcr[ue on top of thc Uotet. Wo Ecd-to rcaa
rcdcdsn of tha lrrytnnrk fraarc rhrt rcdrc€c iu bdght, sc.lc, md bulk eo tbrt iryact m tbevlewr ffon tbe Vtil Spa tornntc tho aki monntain worta U" minimircd.
30383
Cbuclc lrtadircn
AnFat f6, 1999
hgo 2
xopc rtrt tbir lcilcr Fovidct e brsic ftuemrt for frnlhsr dbersgimr. If morp{9[g aay rddidonrl S.rqqs is rodcd, plcerc do mt hcsitrle to *rrrt Ee at (3o3)839-9'nZ or Phil euabochi sr (303) 339-3839;
-
. Vcry tnrly yorn,
GRIMSHAW A HARRING,
8300
o
A Pro(csriourl Conoration
b{vr'1,&
CilbcrtF. Mc},,[cbb
GFWmv
cc: hmryR. Wcrr (vls fq no. gG4Z6-?11g)
Tm Moombcad (via tb.r as. glo{il9-ZlS,n
4l & LGra HnrEq (ds frx no. 97GflGjj4S)
Gcorgc nubcr (vir tu w, ntr479-z4sz\)
SENT BY:GRIiIS|.IAT I HARRING'0-tE-98 i 4:41Pil iP0i
o
s?0t?92t52it 3
SENT BY:CfIIIISHAI| E HARNINO'0-13-9S ; 2:53PI iPO;
o
3038393800{9?04?92452;S 2
OilbstF. llcN3tuh
(303) r39-3ZU
Chrc& Madiron
EEst WGst ParhErs
100 BaEt lbong Placc
Drawr 2770
Avm, CO 81620
GnncsEAw & Ilennnvo
^'
PIEO'ESOEVT'T OOh:PIOP lf,lo!(.|trltllxrrrD aT t al?
sur'T! e000
I?OO
'.D|OOIN
ETNDT
DI!TyEB. q)rai.tDo to06-{!0s
tlllrEolfl ool! are.lNoo
ME &OPttB €Oe |!$tcta
DUA,EJ o,ta[ trrreaitcrt ill|t!. tEJ t
Augrrst 13, 1999
fu No. no{i45.t205
pond$(lgrin&rrylar|lg.coo
http/ trw.lrirrrhawharlng;cm
Re: ffiinancc No. 10 Asctrdiry thc Manioc's Special Developlocd Diefict
Daar Chrct:
Thc Vril Spr Condminiun Auociation ie orrcntly cmridering r jndbial cbatlcilgc
to tte Vril Towu Corrcil'r alryrwal of Orrilinarcc No. 10 m luly 20, lg99.. Ar you Inow,
Odinancc No. l0 rmcndcd tbe Mardott'r Special Developmcot Diffict ("SDD') a[d *rill
allow thc rcoovdim of frc criciqg hocl buildiogr and thp constnrction of thp Gorp Crtck
Club.
Ws belicve fratthere wcrt swcral uerious enon of bothprocedure and substsncc
Egotdiug you rpplicetion rs tpproved by tho Town Couoctl thrt give rirc to tbc judbisl
c'ballcnge. For example, thc Town coucil'o filding in tbc orrdiaru thrt nauy rdvcccc
cffectc of thc reqtrcstod tlcvirdons frsm the dcvelopoent standords of tlc uodcrlyiug zoning
are ouc/eigbd by tbe public b€Doftr providcd by 6e Dtuticrn docs mt mGct rbt ZoDhg
Codc'r specific tcquiremffi th|t thp Town Curncil mu$ find nthrt $rch doviation povi.{cehfit5 t, tbc To*l tbat outweigh tbc advenc effccu qf nrc[ deviatiot.' fbis gubtte but
mOngru dhinption indicabr thrt, in rtrchturf itc docision, tbc Twrn Corrcil crmncqrEly
can+idcred tbe pblic bccfits provided by thc District inrtcad of the public bcocfib ptovlded
by tb spccific dcviations as rcquired by tbc Zming Codo.
Additionally, tbc Town rcccptcd rn irolrryletc ryIication for nrncrrdm:nt of tbc
SDD, tbe Mrrrioft fttlsal to rffirmatirrcly mcet its burdcn of proof with rtspect to thc tln+
&rtgn criarir by whic[ SDD'r srt to bo analyzcd, Ird nalcrial elcoamr of tb proporcd
dertgur frilod to conply with tb rcqtfulncdts in thc Lionrhpad nc0ewfoencot M1gtrr Plrn.
Altbsugb Tm ltfoortbcrd, Town Attorry for Vail, bar cbaractcrized tbcce rrgumcutr ar
"byper-technical," wc belisw that the hciglilcord sbDddds of review inpo$d by thc Zoning
SENT BYsORITSHAI{ A HARRINO,B-13-99 ; 2353Plt ;PCi
o
CluclcMdism
Auguct 13, 1999
hge 2
code mandetc d"ttibd fpetircc wirb rylpccrb ell of tb rutuirc@cors cmied rbrch"tbst tbt' war oot d*ft* complirnco wirh-r''pcd to the adorabtr oi oci""*o No. 10, anotbrt a judgc rrflld fi'd thrt ooo or motr of rnic affis of uoa*ompliauce conrtilrEssvcrriblo aror tcrcby voilhg rbe Odi!@!.
Befm ,'rHjg r.finrr dccicion oa wbcthcr to filc a complelrf" fu Veil Spa tt
Trytry in hovlng whthcr tbc Mamiot iu willing to reconsriifsr --t-r"dify 6mc of 1he&dg[ funres tbrt ae of grcatcst coucrn to rtE v;il spa. such a Edesign of ksy limiedelcmm ney obvirts tbc D€od br thc Judicial actioo ti:cruc Unr of ic fte cerwo in thirruncrf ploase conhct me. (303-El9-37Z, $ phil euabochi (303-939-3933) at roon aspocsibh so rhlt wo can dbcusr thcsc mattcn.
Very ruly yors,
CRIMSHAW & HARRINO,
A Ptofesduel CoroontionI nn-'"---
h-l nrbt. - t
f _vu_':-' :1.--)Gilbcrt P. McNcish
G8ltf,/nmv
cc: Jrmcr R. Wcrr (r'la fax no. n0*4.TGTltEl
Tom Moonhcad (viE far rc. V10479.2157)
Al & Irrts II$$r (via ft,r u. 9/0.4?6554S)(horga Rurbff (vir frr N. nU4792tS2)
8?04?82152;f 33038393800{
FIL? /.;//PI
TOWI,IOFVilL
75 South Frcntage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970479-2tM
FAX 970-479-2157
July 30, 1999
Henry Pratt
Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz Architects
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail/Gore Creek Club
Dear Henry,
Congratulations ! The Manion redevelopment proposai hac been approved.
The purpose ofthis lefter is to provide you with written documentation of the Town's approval of the proposed
redevelopment of the Maniott and the new construction of the Gore Creek Club.
As you are aware, on Tuesday, July 20, 1 999, the Vail Town Cormcil approved Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999,
upon second rearling. The Town Council's approval carried with it several conditions. The conditims of approval
are outlined in Section 6 of the ordinance.
The appnoval of Ordinance No. l0 is valid for tbree years. Pursuant to Section l2-9A-12 of the Zoning Regulations,
you must begin initial constuction of the special development district withh three and continue diligently towards
completion of the poject. If the project is to be developed in phases, you must begin construction of each
subsequent phass u/ithin ons yssl ofthe completion ofthe prwious phase.
Again, congratulations. Should you have any questions or concems, as always, pleas€ do not hesitate to call. You
can reach me by telephone at 970479.2J45.
Sincerely;
rQQa*a
George Ruther, AICP
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
tro"ouoruo
Uiil |AJG. 26. i9e5t 1a: 4:lruilC'-PARTlFtsgP[ ;
Augus2Sr 199
30r08r 8t00.o
No'+ro u9';!oE;r I
AutClu&rteqn-,uryrrrrr.g&rt.gbrbflu
Et-lsr _LEqT
o
Gnorerrw & Il*nnso '
^tlctllEErrrLc.lD,E ftDrl?uttl^a!a,rE!!!h: -^ ItDIjEfGr"r! 3El!!AmvltD sEfi.DOaD.tal
+rlilllrutcortr.rrc
_ :EeF|ff.r$r EetrrD{a{. dntF^?.^-t-trcrf-irF.rffrtG
olDGt tdcMD'609)|t*tra
Ch+t Medo
lul E|lttl@r| nrcc'
Dtrryila27TO
Avos, Cqtmdo lt62O !' :'
Ic: O6tnnc No. 10, Sl&r of 19f9. rtqtiag fftltlou Scdd nernl@ccDlrFier No. l
DcrrC|fit:
ltb Ifr ir.iqbd o erarrirc-rb rylgcoltctwcn V"it SFcondonbfoo rrroei*io. tlrll sDr*d htc lcqddrt6 &rDEriGr, 1nc. (.h4g,16rt rru Eu h.t *EGL. ptEc;'6-tttf tffi rna, f it rccmbs noct qrrrro:oT tonrd t b 6. mrotri@ Da!G; stdc il;E;fr; cq,y b ur.
fffcqru
l. EtC lsncr_ngqdy flht d dlliry,r$, DurE. b lpod Aii, ru*oucrtou b rb row. of vdi o,iliod spcdn Dc.EG;-#;\t. 7, Irf,rrrtor,rD{ilil& rcrort u vdt, rihidb E{sry rtritrp illdilco-;-tb;ili.d Ebibrt A .odlc f9q_rl_qt.grt oTl mrC rui-U-vrnler !$E tr tu cbqg lr ftEft i! tb
"ura.d Blsir a ua tE rgr".ro o-oit-rfr u-urc irm ruErcu o( sFdrtDcnt@lu Drfiu Nq z _rad e odtl-rit tq&dddrcdr H tbrh h chrp.r 9' of tu Tow! dVrfl TrdlSD1nbtlo',r. -nfi-;gr"
Ilrt ib rlCtqtrE $dr De Drdr hlb br sf r Dh 'r"-'rnrol-o a$;d.t D.rirolu Dirqrc rr &t ffi h slodDD 12-9A of rhE Tora d yril
"ebg-GluilFm -"
' 2. wirt$Brb tb noditcrt&u of Snrrufl,trrrefirru @ lfip I 6f E'rrhirA, Er[C qu .[a rE rgg $rb.d-im ;iG-r[-!.rsE-ri n. orupndd arc. r p p:nrg na;d-;ffirrt+ n b i'dar turtir roradnrr
Ell_crtro-ttc h?rf' af fu-lirildd'nrerun to Ur-tbr*6 !, ? 6cilowrl rcoad'6-di'& dn eynillEE;ff or-rlpqFeu ror. ffi bf
lr qledol wlll tr&lc soor#6lr -r,--,lffirii fril-GFrciiilg., o.o.cl. rftu t
slilinie . zs. lseqfl 1E:43A1,lllc,
(EM/uv
Erloetrtfc: tcr R. Wcrs
gFT.
o
HEqr-BABrryEEgil ;30t1893800r r{o'2,1i0 r+9'fzos:* e .
'cbctMafiE
AuSErt 2t. lgtgghgr2
lovrEllrr lDEot|| c rry o6e ctrltlu cE elbt drry Iilt E|lDsd b Ey Drft of ecpyruid E,rcurq i*+cdrt orwtG so rmo 6 EEDOTE, u pcouaE bnt* utdc rgrcs tnu neicru-*tfr. inclurr eodrdmi ud-t'! drrn !s 3sffiic lij[thg of c u rb gfru- [1Ed"
3' Wit naoc re g$eniou of rbc nprftr,'r d*Er b*lr d fu odl9T4 Sb- q-Fr z e giffitr.ffi lrrt b EFditcu Tprftrdoo $ruF.'!. 6! rDL!. rud Tr of + afrndffiT SEoEdry^Ff,lc.d oeqc0 2 0f &libitA- a b ihrrrr'd Er 6r. uF"b;; *i ffi-+-hligh d-tc ct ,sr Dmr tu 3 &Gr"EMc rsEr u8 ir qticrdosr,il dbd. itirU6G;.r.li;n rs potc,org'' pc'o.a, wr*; E''EE, rncur.' c rry oo* *"a*t d e"d-r of rry Eztr6cbalb rq'Eutdtc Blci,ru C;;fii;.d," dutuU.r.trrch 'lr'eirnprt. aE'na''r c pc@Ers,i:r Dr&E Brc-.go:-6d iE m,bd;;iao i*rdecdiln.. tdo.* edl bc *.d'd-riro or*s-d, ffic-ra.
I*ffif;f"tggq {F .t bltrra trc G*trdry tftrtiorffi**?TffiT'bffi-"fiffitffiffi'.*fll.*Tr 3 of EsDftA, riucEf;ffie ryglbrdildrlt-ddtb3gfr*Tgn:*, t*3qry.*..ffi ffiitr ffi#ffi#,;,TTPffi *1-i*tr's,t6fr 5l,ii#,ffi ffiH'.ffiffi-Ilf,.Fffi*.Froililfr;ffi.ft$ffig;ry; glE-f"'rF," "ffi,ffi5gg,Hf Tf .**1hg*qC*hnG;.?"ffi1ffiHfrr,::ffg'#*9:T3ry111|a''dffi;ffiLiutrcd cinrc, ud $d b; @E ffirirtrfffiiiffi,ffi
5. WUdn E\," (O Of'.fro ro' ds rpm,u^b[ iuo q'rr.{,n.u' c@lp,.Edw uir tcu rjruar trcfio, i"rv-ini.toiJ | {FI L,,r or_scsirr uH,sro*.dffi $ftL$ffi o aluiii, Jfo p'i.t c'c.$ N;: e9 c..rf ru !r rsn,
VGry Euly yourlr,
qD[SIIAltt & EAnnD{d,
A ProtudqlCcpmtm
4,hf ,€ie&/d
o[DcsrF. Mctrdo n2 fra
sEf{'|nrc. es. rsssl ro: €FrItO
Oln't Mld,*
tugtr ?t, rfi}ryel
qgr_qncrrgpi ;ESFT -o l38tf00ro
No.eEfo u9'ftorir r
lto rnr'' * ffi rDm rn grccd o !y Erc-4$rgm llooqda, b. o tUl
-dryof
'" ,. , , , ,.. =
_. igri, $sd-il'ctEdb6bdry
fircffi "*), uto D''
'!c 'ntodP to rcr o brrrgd
sEN'iHge. ?H:l:ggtl !tsi.13.f1il8,Eesr.Hgsr-PARIUfBSI iEa.rz.rsil rr
1.
hIEsT Fl tr
---
ETHIBIT A
Prgr I
' 003tlflS00.No'zt1ft srf'ftos;t s'
,gtlr,gzftll
tl
.t
I
I
t
I
!
I
I
I
H[![J
u
I
I
Eogratoooo. re'2e14 uf.,7ros;r o
I
.i-ff , ff , tgFr{ lt glPtt q{p3 FffiD€qg=rrl-l.l^.*rr{hp 1 0198.3/15-r
,q.el
I
-"'tE-
"+-
'tr
,F...
ryet- lff I l':gr
t,a
exrrErr i -"
L'-ii...-...-hg2' :'
sottlglsoor No.3+1 tltPrPos.i* I
coNFERENq c€it|€Pl 'l
EIHIIITA-Pasel
fJc.rr.tets .l:IrStat
,*.'-,.-.'-t'1-l,t--*-' i
fllt cOPy
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, JULY 20, 1999
.7:OO P.M.IN TOV couNctL GHAMBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Times of items a1e apProximate, subject to change, and cannot be reried upon todetermine at what time Council will consider an item.
1.
2.
CITIZEN PARTIC!PAT|ON. (5 mins.)
CONSENTAGENDA: (5 mins.)A. Proclamation No.2, Series of 1999, Community Service andVolunteerism Colorado Cares Day July 31, 199-9.B. Ordinance No. 1 7, Series of 19gg, seiond reading of an
ordinance An ordinance Authorizing the conveyince of Fee Titre
of the Red Sandstone Creek Land and lmprovements Thereon
Owned by the Town Of Vail and Fully Described As Follows:
A parcel of land within the NE % sE % section 1, Township s south,Range 81 West of. the Sixth principal Meridian, Eagd C;;t,
Colorado, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of said NE % SE %section 1, said point arso being the Northwesterry corner of Brock
D, Lion's Ridge Subdivision, according to the map thereof
recorded in Book 215 at page 648 in the office of the Eagle
County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder; thence, departinj saidSoutherly line, N22.33,00" W 84.13 feet; thence NaS.qS;2A, E55.05 feet; thence 53.g5 feet along the arch of a curve to the
right, having a radius of 200.00 feet, a central angle of 15.25,31,,
and a chord that bears N57"29'16" E 53.69 feet; lhence 41.g0 feetalong the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 27.00 feet,
a_central angle of 88.54'26', and a chord that bears 570"21,44" E37.82 feet, thence s25"54'31'E 137 .47 feet to the said southerlyline of the NE % SE % Section 1, said line also being me nortnehy
line of said Block D; thence, atong said line S87.4g,5S, W 1SO.8ifeet to the point of beginning, containing 0.3964 ""r"r, rnor" oi-
less.
The bearings ofthe above described parcel are based on a bearingof N87'48'35" E on the southerry rine of the NE % sE % section iT5S, R81W per the ptat of Lion;s Ridge Subdivision.
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 19g9, second reading of an ordinancerepealing and re-enacting_Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1S9S, SpeciatDevelopment District No. 7, The Mariott's Mountain Resort at Vait,amending and re-establishing the Approved Development plan inaccordance with section 12-gA-10 0f the Zoning Regurations to allow forthe interior and exterior remoclel of the existing -hoteiend
the constructionof the Gore creek crub, and setting forth detairs in regard thereto. (1 hr.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Approve, approve with conditionsor deny Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999, bn second reading,
3.
George Ruther
Henry Pratt
4.
Tom Moorhead
BACKGROUND MTTONALE: On Monday, March 8, 1999, the Town of VailPlanning & Environmentar commission' reviewed and recommended
3.pryorl of the proposed major amendment to speciar o*"r"p,.,,.""iiistrictNo.7, The Marriott, pursuant to section tz-to-o or ftre ro*n Ji v"iiioningRegulations.
The Pranning & Environmentar commission's recommendation of approvalwas based upon the review of the nine design criteda ouflined in i[J'i"rmemorandum. Having.reviewed the criteria, the commissi"" t"r"i,nl,],n"proposed major amendment to speciar Deveropment District No. 7 comprieswith the nine desisn crfteria ouilined in secrion iz_sn_8 ;f i#?"#liL,,Municipar code. Additionalry, the appricant demonstrated to the satisfactionof the commission that any adverse'effects of the requested deviation fromthe deveropment slandards of the underrying zoning ir" ort*"ign;J'or'in"public benefits provided.
The Pranning & Environmentar commission's recommendation canied withit twelve conditions of approvar. In response to1rr"ng"" ;"J" t";;;;""by the appricant, the councir, on June 22"d, eriminated six of the oriqinalconditions. The remaining conditions of appiovat arel"r"'Ji"'slii,"'"H
"Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999.
on June g, 1ggg, the Town of Vair Design Review Board fonrvarded itsrecommendation of approval to the iown councir. ft," -go-;,.
recommendation carried with it six recommendations for tn" c"rl"ir,"consideration' The councir considered the Board's r""ornr"no"tiln-onJune 22nd and wiil forward direction to tne Boaio as part of the ordinancereview process.
STAFF RECOMMENDfTfg,N, The Community Development Departmentrecommends that the councir approve ordinanci No. 10, s"ii""J-riigg,-",presented on second reading.
ordinance No. 1g, series of 1 ggg, first reading of an ordinance Authorizingthe Conveyance of Fee TIt lo.I_-U Buitding S,Vair east foAging,
"t.o'k;-o*nas 4093 Spruce Way #36, Vait, Cotorado-8t'OSi. (rS mins.)
ACTION RE.UESTED OF COUNCTL: Approve, modiff ordeny OrdinanceNo. 18, Series of 1999, on first reading.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On March 1, 1999, the Town of Vailpurchased a unit at Vail.East Lodging for the purpose of utilizing the unit inthe Town of Vail's guy Do{l Rrogra;. rn"i iurcn""" h"" *;;;.f"ti;'resulted in a sale of the unit to a qualified Ouyei anO permanent deedresrrrctions being put in place that restrict the future sare of the unit to otherqualified purchasers with a three (3%) perceniappreciation cap.
STAFF REGOMMENDATION: Approve Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1999on first reading. \rsr rso vr rvvv'
Town Manager's Report. (5 mins.)
Adjournment - 8:30 p.m.
5.
o.
l'
. *
''l-
I
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL n[aE3 ARE AppROXtflATE A D SUBJECT TO CBANGEI
THENExrvArlrowntduTrc-rf nEeluunwoRKsEssroNWLL BE ON TUESDAY,7t27lgg, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. tN TOV COUr'rClf- CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONWILL BE ON TUESDAY, 8/3/99, BEGtt{NtNG AT 2:00 p.M. tN TOV COUlrrClr- CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING . . .wlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 8r3r99, BEGINN|NG AT 7:00 p.M. tN Tov couHcn- CHAMBERS.
sislFlqgsg
'nterpretration
available upon re-qGs1w-itE zZ n-our notification. ptease cafl 479-2332 voiceor479-2356 TDD for information.
C:IAGENOATC
MEMORANDUM
To: Vail Town Council
From: CommrurityDevelopmentDepartment
Date: July20, 1999
Re: Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail Redevelopment Proposal (Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999)
Section I BACKGROUND
On October 19, 1998, the applicant and their representatives met with Torvn Staff for a pre-application conference.
The purpose of the pre-application meeting was to inform the staffof the applicant's intent to submit plans for a
major amendment to Special Development Dislrict #7 and a conditional use permit to allow interval ownership in
the Public Accommodation Zone District and to review the submittal requiranents for the project.
On January 12,1999, the applicant appeared before the Vail Town Council and the Planning & Environmental
Commission for ajoint worksession to discuss conceptual redevelopment plans and to express their intent to submit
plans for formal review to the Town of Vail Community Development Departrnent.
On January 25, 1999, the applicant submitted completed development applications to the Town of Vail Community
Development for the proposal to redevelopment the Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail and for the construction of
the Gore Creek Club.
On February 22, 1999, the applicant appeared before the Planning & Environmental Commission for a final review
of the proposed plans for tbe redevelopment of Marriott's Mountain Resoft at Vail and for the construction of the
Gore Creek Club. Following the public hearing the request for final review was tabled until March 8, 1999.
On March 8, 1999, the Planning & Environmental Commission voted unanimously to approve the conditional use
permit to allow for the operation of the Gore Creek Club and a recommendation of approval of the major
amendment to Special Development Distdct No. 7 to the Vail Town Council. The Commission's approval and
recommendation included thirteen conditions.
On March 17, 1999, the applicant appeared before the Town of Vail Design Review Board for a conceptual review
ofthe redevelopment and new construction proposal.
On April 7, 1999, Town of Vail Design Review Board voted ruranimously to table a final review request until April
2t.1999.
On April 13, 1999, the applicant appeared before the Vail Town Council for a worksession to discuss the proposal in
anticipation of an ordinance 1o amend Special Development District No. 7.
On April 2I,1999, the applicant again appeared before the Town of Vail Design Review Board for a conceptual
review ofthe redevelopment and new construction proposal.
On May 5, 1999, the applicant again appeared before the Town of Vail Desigr Review Board for a conceptual
review of the redevelopment and new construction proposal.
On May 19, 1999, the Town of Vail Desigr Review Board drafted a recommendation of approval of the
redevelopment and new construction proposal to be forwarded to the Vail Town Council for consideration. The
Board's recommendation of approval included six conditions.
On June 8, 1999, the Vail Town Council held a site visit and a worksession to discuss the applicant's proposal. The
site visit included a walking tour of the development site and the Vail Spa property.
On June 22,1999, the Vail Town Council held a rvorksession to discuss the draft of Ordinance No. 10, Series of
I 999, an ordinance repealing and re€nacting Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1 995, Special Development District No. 7.
On July 6, 1999, the Vail Town Courcil held a worksession to discuss Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999, an
ordinance repealing and rernacting Ordinance No. i7, Series of 1995, Special Development District No. 7 in
anticipation offirst reading of the ordinance at the evening meeting.
On July 6, 1999, the Vail Town Council held the first reading of Ordinance No. i 0, Series of I 999, at an evening
public hearing meeting. The Council voted (6-1) (Foley) to approve Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999 on first
reading. Second reading of the ordinance was scheduled for the evening of July 20, 1999.
Where applicable, all meetings have been conducted in accordance rvith the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Zoning
Regulations.
Section tr PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant has provided a written description of the proposed redevelopment of Marriott's Mountain Resort at
Vail and the consruction of the Gore Creek Club. The following is a summary of the proposal prepared by staff.
The purpose of the staff summary is to supplement the applicant's information contained in the Town file.
As stated in Section I of this memorandum, the applicant, HMC Acquisition hoperties, Lrc. submitted completed
applications for the redevelopment of Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail and for the new construction of the Gore
Creek Club. To facilitate the redevelopment and new construction, the applicant has submitted an application for a
major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 pursuant to Chapter 9 of the Zoning Regulations of the
Town of Vail, an application for a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter I 6 of the Zoning Regulations and an
application for Design Review pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Zoning Regulations. Copies of the applications are
contained in the Town files.
The redevelopment and remodel of the existing Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail is intended to complement the
interior renovations recently completed in the hotel. The applicant is proposing to "re-skin" the exterior of the hotel,
convert "Windows" restaurant and five accommodation units to three condominiums (approximately 7,700 sq.ft.)
and convert approximately 3,000 sq.ft. of existing ski storagefetail to six new Type III Emplope Housing Units.
The deviations sought as a result of the major amendment request are an encroachment ofeight feet into the required
front setback and three feet into the required west-side yard setback. The proposed remodel is intended to bring tle
existing hotel building and the new Gore Creek Club into compliance with the Architectural Desigr Guidelines
prescribed in Chapter 8 of the recently adopted Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and increase the overall
quality of the hotel and development site.
The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulations to allow
for 63 interval ownership units in the Gore Creek Club. The new club will be constructed in Phase III of the Marriott
development area atop the existing parking sfucture. The club will be comprised of 63 lodginglype of units
lstaling spproximately 73,000 square feet of GRFA. As an interval ownenhip club, the 63 units will be sold in
1/20'intervals. A l/20'! interval guarantees each owner approximately 17 days per year in the Vail Valley. The
applicant anticipates offering owners the opportunity to exchange their club unit within the intemational exchange
market.
Other components of the new club include a full-time front desk for registration and reservations, an owner's
lounge, a health club & spa facility, on-site laundry services, a 61 parking space expansion to the existing parking
structue and three new loading/delivery berths. The 6l new spaces me intended to offset the increase in parking
demand created by the construction of the new club. Approximately 2,500 square feet of retail space will be
constructed on the north side of the club adjacent to West Lionshead Circle.
In addition to the improvements to the existing hotel and the construction of the new club, the applicant is also
proposing site improvements to the property. hoposed site improvements include the removal of an existing
landscape berm on the south side of the property to provide easy access to Gore Creek and the bike path, new
landscaping on the south side of the hotel, a redesign of the existing loading and delivery area and the
implementation of the recommended streetscape improvements along the south side of West Lionshead Circle.
The applicant's proposal is further described in the proposed development plan submined by the applicant, as
identified in Section 4 of pending Odinance No. 10, Series of 1999.
According to the Town of Vail Municipal Code, it shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that any
deviation from the development standards of the underlying zoning provide public benefits tbat outweigh the
adverse effect ofsaid deviation. The applicant and staffhave identified ten public benefits the community will
realize as a result of the redevelopment of Special Development District No. 7 development site. The public
benefits identified include:
1. An increase in the annual hotel occupancy rate through the redevelopment of an older, existing hotel.
2. A significant increase in the Town's supply of short-term, ovemight accommodations to serve our gu.ests and
visitors.
3. The creation of commercial/retail space along West Lionshead Circle as recommended in the Lionshead
Redwelopment Master Plan.
4. The implementation of the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan along West Lionshead Circle.
5. The redevelopment ofa world+lass "anchor" hotel providing a highJevel of guest service.
6. The implementation of the objectives stated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
7. The construction of emplolee housing to off-set the demand resulting from the redevelopment of the hotel
project.
8. A sizeable addition to the Town's sales tax revenue.
9. The partial elimination of an existing on-street loading and delivery area.
10. A'Jump start" to the redevelopment of Lionshead in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, as noted in Section V of this memorandum.
Legal Description:
Zoning:
Development Site Size:
Zonins Analysis
Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Subdivision 3" Filing and Lots C & D, Marcus
Subdivision
Lionshead Mixed-Use 1 Zone District
3.5 acres/l52.666 souare feet
Development Underlying Zoning
Standard Lionshead Mixed Use I
1999 Major SDD
Amendment hooosal
GRFA: up to 250% or 555,682 sq.ft. 94% or 209,892 sqJ\.
Dvelling
Units per Acre: 35 dr-/acre 10.64 du/acre
SiteCoverage: 70%or 155,591 sq.ft. 58%or 128,424sq.fl.
Setbacks:
Front: 10 ft. zft.*Sides: 10 ft. 7 ft (west)* N/C (east)
Rear: l0 ft. l0 ft.Creek: 50 ft. from centerline 117 ft. from centerline
Height:
Maximum: 82.5 ft. 82.5 ft.Average: 71 ft. 65.8 ft.
Landmark
Element: Subjecr to DRB 125 ft.
Parking: per T.O.V. Code 355 spaces
landscaping: 20% or 30,533 sq.ft. 46%' or 69,724 sq.fr".
Loading/Delivery:
Marriott: per T.O.V. Code 5 berths
Gore Creek Club: per T.O.V. Code 3 berths
Uses: per T.O.V. Code Accommodation Units
DvellingUnits
Emplope Housing Units
Fractional Fee Units
Retail/Commerciai
Accessory Uses* Indicates deviations from underlying zoning
Section m FINDINGS
Staff determined, following the required pre-meeting application conference, that the applicant's request was a
major amendment to a special development distict that would also require tbe issuance of a conditional use p€nnit.
This determination was made in accordance with definitions stated in Section 12-9A-2 and the conditional uses
allowed under Section 12-6H-3 ofthe Zoning Regulations.
At the pre-application conference the applicant discussed the goals of the proposed major arnendment, the
relationship ofthe proposal to the applicable elements of the Town's Master Plan, and the review procedure that
would need to be followed for the major amendment application with the Community Development Departrnent
staff. Additionally, staff reviewed the submittal requirements as prescribed in Section lZ-9A-5 of the Zoning
Regulations with the applicant. kr discussing the application, staff informed the applicant that subsection 12-94-
54(13), Environmental Irnpact Report (EIR), would be waived, as permitted by Section 12-12-3 of the Zoning
Regulations. This EIR requirement was waived adminisffatively by staff as it was determined that the proposal was
an alteration, repair and maintenance of existing structures and site improvements. Further, staff informed the
4
applicant that the site plan and landscape plan would meet the intent of the required open space and recreation plan,
as stalf found that additional plans would be redundant.
On March 8, 1999, the Planning & Environmental Conxnission voted unanimously to approve the conditional use
permit request and to recommend approval of the major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 to the
Vail Town Council, with conditions.
In making their decision, the Commission reviewed the conditional use permit request in accordance with the
provisions prescribed in Chapter l6 of the Zoning Regulations, and based upon the submittal materials, statements
contained in the application, staff reports, and the testimony heard during the public hearing, found;
'That the construction and oryration of the 66 interval otynership units in the Gore Creek CIub
adheres to the Wrpose statements of the High Density Mutti-family Zone District and of a
conditional use permit as stated in the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Addilionally, the
construction and operation of the Gore Creek CIub will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to the to the properlies or improvements in
the vicinity of the Club.
In making their decision on the matter of the major amendment to Special Development District No. 7, the
Commission reviewed the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Zoning Regulations. Upon review
of the proposal relative to the nine criteria, the submittal rnaterials, statements contained in the application, staff
reports, and testimony heard at the public hearings, the Commission found;
"That the proposed major amendment to Special Development District #7, Marriou, complies
with the nine design criteria o lined in Section l2-9A-8 of the Town ofVail Municipal Code.
Additionally, the applicant has demonstated to the satisfadion of the Commission that any
adverse elfects of the requested deviation from the development standards of the underlying
zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided. "
The Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission and the Desip Review Board have utilized numerous
Town planning documents in the review of the requested redevelopment and new construction applications. Upon
review of these documents, the Commission and the Board have found that the applicant's proposal complies with
goals, objectives and recommendations adopted by the Town of Vail. Greater detail on the Commission's and
Bomd's review of these documents can be found in Section V of this memorandum.
On July 6, 1999, the Vail Town Council approved Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999, on first reading. Upon review
of the ordinance, the submittal rnaterials, the recommendations of the Planning & Environmental Commission and
the Design Review Board, statements contained in the application, staff reports, and testimony heard at the public
hearing, the Cour:cil found;
"That all the procedures as set forth in Chapter 9A of the Zoning Regulations have been fully
salisf,ed and that the major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 complies wilh the
nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the Zoning Regulations. Additionally. the
applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Vail Town Council that any adverse effects of
the requested deviationsfrom the development standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed
by the public beneJits provided by the Dislrict. Special Development District No. 7 is established
to assure comprehensive development and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious
with the general character of the Town of Vail, Colorado; thatwill provide adequale open space
and recrealional amenities; that will enhance the short-term overnigJtt accommodalion units of
the Town; that \eill promote the development objectives of the Totyn; that will provide deed-
restricled housingfor 10 employees; that v)ill improve the streetscape alongportions of lltest
Lionshead Circle; and that signirtcantly enhance the appearance of the existing hotel. The
development is regarded as complimentary to the Town by the Vail Town Council, the Planning &
Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board, and there are signiJicant aspects of the
Special Development District which cannot be satislied through the imposition ofa standard
zoning district. "
SectionIV PROCEDURALREOUIREMENTS
The development review process for the consideration of the redevelopment of Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail
and the new construction of the Gore Creek Club has been completed in accordance with the provisions outlined in
the Vail Town Code. This includes the review and consideration of the Community Development Department, the
Design Review Board, the Planning & Environmental Commission, and the Vail Town Council.
Subseclion 12-9A-10B ofthe Zoning Regulations outlines the amendment procedures for a major amendment to an
existing special development district. Pursuant to subsection 12-9A-10B;
"Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district shall be reviewed in
accordance with Section l2-9A4 of this Article(Zoning Regulations).
Owners of all property requesting the amendment, or their agents or authorized representatives,
shall sigr the application. Notification of the proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all
property adjacent to the property requesting the proposed amendment, owners of all property
within the special development district, and owners of all property wiftin the special development
district that may be affected by the proposed amendment (as determined by the Department of
Community Development). Notification procedures shall be as outlined in subsection l2-3-6C of
lhis title."
As documented in Section I of this memorandum, the required pre-application and public hearing process was
completed . The report and findings of the Planning & Environmental Commission were forwarded to the Town
Council. The Design Review Board also has forwarded a recommendation for the Town Council's consideration.
On April 13, 1999, in accordance with tbe provisions outlined in subsection 12-3-7D-G, the Vail Town Council
began the review process of the requested applications. The Town Council review process is still in progress.
As contained in tle Town of Vail files for these applications, the required notification was sent to the adjacent
property owners in accordance with subsection l2-3-6C. Notification of the Planning & Environmental
Commission public hearings were sent to adjacent properties owners and published in a local paper ofrecord on
February 5, 1999 and February 19, i999. Notification of the five meetings with the Design Review Board was
published in a local paper ofrecord on March 12,April 2,April 16,April 30, and May 14,1999, respectively.
Notification of the worksession and evening public hearings with the Vail Town Council was also published in
accordance with the requirements of the Vail Town Code.
Section V COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS
The Planning & Environmental Commission, the Design Review Board and the Town staff relied upon the adopted
Town planning documents throughout the review of the applicant's proposal. The relevant documents relied upon
include, the Zoning Regulations, the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, the Lionshead Redevelopment lvlaster
Plan, and the Vail Land Use PIan. These documents provide goals, objectives and recommendations for
consideration when reviewing a development plan proposal. Compliance with the Zoning Regulations is addressed
in Sections II,III, & ]V of this memorandum. Compliance with the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan, the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, and the Vail Land Use Plan are outlined below.
Town of Vail Streetscaoe Master Plan
The Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan does not specifically address the street frontage adjacent to the proposed
development site. However, the guidelines for sidewalk improvements, paving, lighting and public art were used as
Cl
a basis for determining streetscape improvements. In the case ofthe proposed development, the applicant has
proposed to construct a heated, concrete sidewalk with landscape features incorporated and new streel lighting from
the eastemmost property line to the westernmost property line of the development site. Additional sidewalk has
been proposed, off of the applicant's site, to the existing sidewalk along the south-side of the South Frontage Road.
This portion of sidewalk will not be heated. Further, pursuant to condition #8 in Section 6 of Ordinance No. l0
Series of 1999, the applicant is required to incorporate public art into the desigr of the streetscape along West
Lionshead Circle.
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan
The applicant's development site is within the area govemed by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan was adopted by the Vail Town Council in December of 1998. The purpose
of the plan is to encourage redevelopment and new development initiatives within the Lionshead area. The plan
outlines the goals and objectives for the enhancement oflionshead and proposes recommendations, incentives and
requirements for redevelopment and new development.
Chapter Four of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan identifies issues and provides recommendations that
need to be considered in all planning and policy decisions as Lionshead redevelops.
The applicant's property is located in what is identified in the plan as the "Resort Lodging Hub". This area is
located just west of the Lionshead Commercial Core and is comprised of mostly high{ensity residential
development. All future plans and proposals should work to reinforce the residential cbaracter of the area. New
development should aim for quieler pedestrian streets, well-defined pedestrian connections and mor€ intensive
landscaping and higher quality streetscape development.
The plan suggests that new development is constructed on a north-south orientation to improve physical, visual and
sun access to the buildings and the streets below.
The plan proposes improvements to the intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. Currently, this
intersection handles heavy loads of traffic for lodging and service deliveries. The plan suggests the elimination of
on-street loading and delivery and an improved pedestrian area at the intersection. To this end, the plan
recommends that loading and delivery areas are deep enough into the building or Foperty to Fevent delivery trucks
from blocking vehicle or pedestrian traffic. The plan further recommends that these areas are landscaped and/or
screened to improve the aesthetic quality ofthe streetscape. In no case, however, shall a property utilize the public
roadway or pedeslrian area to stage service and delivery vehicles.
Chapter Four ofthe plan provides Master Plan Recommendations for the overall Lionshead Study Area. In Chapter
Four, the plan encourages the creation of landmark featwes in Lionshead. A landmark featue is a significant
architectural element that all visitors to Lionshead can identify and remember. Landmarks signify important points
of entry, critical intersections in the pedestrian netrvork, as well as destinations and visual reference points.
Appropriate locations for landmark features are the east pedestrian portal, the central retail mall area and the west
pedestrian portal in the vicinity of the intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. The development
site is immediately adjacent to West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. ln accordance with the plan, special
"landmark" building elements, such as chimneys, towers, or other unique architectual forms, may exceed the
Absolute Building Height, subject to approval by the Design Review Board. This provision is intended to provide
for architectural creativity and quality of building form. However, it shall not be used to circumvent the intent of the
building height limitations.
In addition to encourasing the creation of "landmarks", Chapter Four of the plan also ad&esses public views. On
May 20,1997, recognizing the importance of visual connections, the Vail Town Council approved the use ofthe
existing Town of Vail view corridor ordinance to designate the first protected view conidors in Lionshead. In order
to qualify for protection rmder the Town's ordinance, a public view corridor must meet the following criteria:
a. Is the view critical to the identity, civic pride, and sense ofplace of Lionshead? A niceview isnot
sufficient.
b. Is the view seen from a widely used, publicly accessible viewpoint? Views from private property
cannot be recognized or protected by this ordinance.c. Is the view tbreatened? Is there a possibility that development on nearby property would block the
view?
The proposed development site is not located within an adopted view conidor, nor does it meet the three criteria
described above to be designated as a public view conidor.
Cbapter Five of the plan provides detailed recommendations based upon the examination of individual parcels of
land in the Lionshead area. The intent of the examination is to identify important objectives for redevelopment of
specific parcels in Lionshead. The recommendations for the Marriott property are listed below:
5.13.1 The Marriott
With approximately 320 rooms, the Marriott is the only supply of hot beds in Lionshead,
The single largest structue in Lionshead, it is also very visible, especially from the west.
It is consequently a high priority renovation project, and all reasonable measures should
be taken by the Town of Vail to encourage and facilitate its enhancement. Specific iszues
regarding this property are as follows:
5.13.2 Redevelopment or Development of the Parking Structure
The best opportunity for new development on the Marriott property is the existing
parking structure (figure 5-17). If this site is developed, attention should be given to the
relationship between the development, Gore Creek, the Gore Creek recreation path, and
the west day lot. Vertical development should step back from the recreat.ion path, and
there should be a clear separation (most likely a landscape buffer) between the public
space of the recreation path and the private space ofthe residential units.
5.13.3 Infill Opportunities
There are several tennis courts on the south side of the Marriott. This area presents an
opportunity for low-rise infill development that eases the visual and physical transition
from the existing structure to the Gore Creek recreation path.
5.13.4 Opportunities for Fagade Renovation
Exterior renovation of the Marriott is a community priority, but the size and dimensions
of the structure present a cballenge, and it is unlikely that the architectural desip
guidelines (see Chapter 8) can be fully met. However, this should not discourage exterior
renovation, and the Town of Vail Desigr Review Board should insure that the intent of
the guidelines is met. (This is a basic premise of the architectural design guidelines,
relevant to all existing buildings in Lionshead).
5.13.5 West Lionshead Circle in Front of the Marriott
Any future development or redevelopment of the Marriott property should include a
continuous secondary pedestrian walk on the south side ofWest Lionshead Circle. A
pavement snowmelt system is strongly recommended because of icing problems on the
walkway in winter.
Chapter Eight of the plan prescribes the architectual desip guidelines for redevelopment and new
development in Lionshead The intent of the guidelines is to direct the growth of the community ttuough
distinct levels ofperception, from views of the neighborhood, from the mountain and highway, to
perceptions within its pedestrian streets, to the detail level ofartistry and omamentation on the slructures
8
themselves. The Town of Vail Design Review Board has reviewed the plan for compliance with Chapter
Eight of the plan and forwarded a recommendation to the Vait Town Council. A copy of the Architectural
Guidelines and the Board's recommendation to the Town Council is contained in the Town's files.
Vail Land Use Plan
The goals contained in the Vail Land Use Plan are to be used as the Town's policy guidelines during the
review process for a major amendment to an existing special development district. Staff has reviewed the
Vail Land Use Plan and believes the following policies are relevant to the review of this proposal:
1. General Growth/Development
t.l Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between
residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent
resident.
The quality of the environment including air, water, and other natural resources should be
protected as the Town grows.
The quality ofdevelopment should be maintained and upgade whenever possible.
Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas
(infill).
3.Commercial
The hotel should be preserved and use more efficiently.
The Village and Lionshead are the best locations for hotels to serve the futue needs of
the destination skier.
Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail, therefore, conversion
to condominiums should be discouraged.
Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing cbaracter of each
area is preserved through the implementation ofthe Town's plans.
Village Core/Lionshead
4.1 Futwe commercial development should continue to occur primarily in existing
commercial areas. Fulure commercial development in the Core areas needs to be
carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery.
Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing cbaracter ofeach
area is preserved ttuough the implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the
Vail Village Master Plan.
5.Re$identirl
Quality timeshare units should be accornmodated to help keep occupancy rates up.
Affordable employee housing should be made available through private efforts, assisted
by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with appropriate restrictions.
t.2
1.3
t.t2
J. -t
3.2
J.J
3.4
4.
4.2
5.1
5.2
The Vail Land Use Plan projects a need for additional lodging units in the Town of Vail. While the
statistical information used to poject need is most likely, outdated, there continues to be a need for
additional lodging units in the Town of Vail. The Plan projected a need for a total of 395 additional
lodging urits by tbe year 2000. The Plan firther suggests that increased density for commercial, residential
and lodging uses in the Village/Lionshead Cse areas would be acceptable so long as the existing character
of each area is being peserved.
SectionVI STAFFRECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends that the Vail Town Council approve Ordinance
No. 10, Series of 1999, or second reading. StafPs recommendation for approval is based upon the review
and analysis of the applicant's goposals in accordance with the Vail Town Code. Furthermore, staff finds,
that pursuant to the review and consideration of the submittial materials, the statements contained in the
applications, the applicable Town planning documents, staff s analysis ofthe proposed plans, and
tesimmy heard at the public hearings, the proposal to redevelopment Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail
and the new consEuction of the Gore Creek Club complies with the Town's development objectives.
l0
rL*Q.^*t-t
George Ruther,AICP
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Vail Town Council
R Thomas Moorhead, Town Attorney
ruflopt
FgsD
TOWII OFVAIL
75 South Frcnnge Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970479-2tM
FAX 970-479-2157
July 15, 1999
Phillip M. Quatrochi
Grimshaw & Haning, P.C.
1700 Lincoln, Suite 3800
Denver, Colorado 802034538
Re: Maniott Redevelopment; Odinance No. 10, Sedes of 1999
Dear Phillip,
As discussed in our telephone conversation of July 13, 1999, I forwarded the information you requested with regard
to Marriott's application for a major arnendrnent to SDD No. 7.
As you will recall from our telephone conversation, we read over the list of submittal requirements and you stated
lhat you had received the information you requested. In fact, your only questions were whether an Envirmmental
Irnpact Report @IR) had been required and whetber a survey was submitted In response to your questions, I stated
that pursuant to the Town Code, the requirement for the EIR was waived and that a survey was contained in the
Town's files
I encourage you to personally review the Town files with respect to Marriott's applicatim to insure you bave
received the informatim you are seeking. The Town files have been, and continue to be, available for public
inspection at the Cornmunity Development Departrnent during regular business hours.
To date, I have trot received any additioal materials with respect to Marriott's application. Should any additional
information be submitted, regardless of the source, it will become part of the Town's file. Again, the Town's files
have been and will continue to be available for public inspection
As a courtesy, I will fax to you a copy of the memorandum to the Vail Town Council from the Community
Development Departrnent upon its completion. I request that any information you, or your firm, int@ds to present
to the Vail Town Council at the public hearing for the second reading of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999, on July
20, 1999, be forwarded to my attention at the Town of Vail Cornmunity Development Departrnent. You can
forward the information most easily via fax. My fax number ts 97 04792145.
I look forward to your continued involvement in the public review process of the Maniott.
Sincerelv.
Xc:
{gu"ot*" ro
sEilT 8Y:GRrrSfiAr 0 HARRT]{0,{5?-I5-98 ; 2:41pr ;
lhillD M. ancroOi
(3O3) 83$,3133
9?01?S2452;S 2
Gcuge futtcr
Twnof Vail
75 Sou6FrutryeRoed
Vail, Colondo tl6ii7
Re: Musion ndovetopndt; Orrdiorrc No. 10, SEcood R adiry
Dear Gcorge:
I rm writiqg to follow up or,cosvcr$dm sf fuly 13 8!d b coffirn that *rt"to. u.g p ovidcd atl *rifiro rud g"inir mrleriatr ftrt arc dfocrrs of tuc lUrniot'rapplication fp6 rner'rrncff of tbir suD. I bcllevc rhat tDe only ihm o.t * havo not recoi0 tho cwvry. _If you could plcrrc. ry!_* | co$, ts rootr as pobiUe, it wqild b, grcarty -
apprccirrcd. or FcatBr nubcr ir 080z{s41-3; and yor cd,cna ui" dr."}, b ou, qfftce.
Yql alro ElotiolDdt[st th8 Mrniott Day be submittirg additional matsialcprior to tbc rocond rcadtng of tbs ordinanpe on July z0: I would lib-o roquo$ tbet you lbxur^r cout of tbcrc naErlrb a8 soon ac yur rcccivathcm, aloqg wrth uy
"aairuomr alwymftm* sbcthcs grynp_d by you,'tlc lt[Nrrioc, or a tli"I purty, tt"t ir ro be efrfcNt oth! cdudl ocnbcm tn tgmruirlonrt pclct to iu oiruttutiid F.td;i, ruty l-6rcgrrding Odinrcc No. 10.
Thrlk ym rglin ftr yolr srEishocc thougborn 6is procctc,
GlnoasgAw & Itennnyo
a F.BqDEercNrr.oonFon a!o!rAIlllFqlltl.rE 4T LAn|Bo:rIlStso
l1no riEYo4ilf rnnsTrufvtn qpn^Do aorc.lae
?lrrJlPlloNr €ot rtxler@ElEit@PM Aoa e!e{!tr!F&IU. t-Ir^t'.rrir!ar,s-r_Er|! alalF!
Itrly 14, 1999
Yours very tuly,
CRIMSHAW & IIARRING.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1999
2:OO P.M. AT ToV coUNcIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Tlme of ltems are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be reliedupon to determlne at what ffme Council wili consider an item.
FILE r;r/PY
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments - euality & euantityUpdate. (30 mins.)
PEC Report. (15 mins.)
Discussion of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1g99, an ordinance
repealing and re-enacting Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1995,
Special Development District No. 7, The Maniott's Mountain
Resort at Vail, amending and re-establishing the Approved
Development Plan in accordance with Section 12-94-10 of the
Zoning Regulations to allow for the interior and exterior remodel of
the.existing hotel and the construction of the Gore Creek Club,
and setting forth details in regard thereto. (20 mins.)
AGTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Review Ordinance No. 10.
Series of 1999, which is on for first reading at this evening's
meeting.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: On Monday, March 8, 1999, the
Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission reviewed andrecommended approval of the proposed major amendment toSpecial Development District No.7, The Mairiott, pursuant to
section 12-16-6 of the Town of Vail Zoning Regulations.
The Planning & Environmental Commission's recommendation of
app.roval was based upon the review of the nine design criteria
outlined in the staff memorandum. Having reviewed th.-e criteria,the Commission found that, the proposed major amendment to
Special Development District No. 7 complies wlth tne nine design
criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-B of the Town of Vail Municifal
Gode. Additionally, the applicant demonstrated to the satisfactionof the Commission that any adverse effects of the requested
deviation from the development standards of the underlying
zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided.
The Planning & Environmental Commission's recommendation
canied with it twelve conditions of approval. ln response to
g!31S". made to the plans by the applicant, the Council, on June22"", eliminated six of the original conditions. The remaining
conditions of approval are found in Section 6, of Ordinance Nol
10, Series of 1999.
On .lrrne 8, 1999, the Town of Vail Design Review Board
forwarded its recommendation of approval to the Town Council.
The Board's recommendation carried'with it six recommendationsfor the Council's consideration. The Council considered the
Board's recommendation on June ZZnd and will forward direction to
the Board as part ofthe ordinance review process.
STAFF REGOMMENDATION: The Community Development
Department recommends that the Council approvi Ordinance No.
10, Series of 1999, as presented at this evening's meeting.
1.
Lane Wyatt
2.
George Ruther
3.
George Ruther
Ned Gwathmey
Greg Hall
Greg Morrison
Tom Moorhead
! Apry{ of the pEC approvar_for a Minor Amendmenr to the GordenDominic Maurieilo pe_ak Deveropment pran to construct a skii;;;;r; Tract B, VailViilage 7h. (5 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Table item untitthe August3, 1999 Council work session so DRB has an opportunity toreview the proposal.
Discussion of Model Traffic Code. (1 hr.)
ACTTON REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Consider resutts of thespeed studies and the recommendation that the Town of Vail -
speed.limit be 25 mph in residentiar sections unress othenariseposted.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: The Town of Vait has beengnfgj"ilS trafitc regutations from the 1977 edition of the Model
]1aff C-9de-as. adopted by Ordinance No. 37, Series of 1978.The Traffic Code was revised in 1995 and is recommended foradoption by the Vail Town Council. The Model iraffic Codeprovides a residential speed limit of 30 mph. The public Worksuepanment and the Vail police Department have in cooperationco1!r19ted specific speed studies throughout the Town toestablish the appropriate speeds on ouiresidentiar streets. Thecode requires that to rower the specified 30 mph speed rimit it isneces.sary to have specific speed studies to luitity such reducedspeed limits.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the speed studiesconducted and their results, it is the recommendation that theTown of Vail residential streets have a speeC timit of 25 mphunless otherwise posted.
6. Infoimation Update. (10 mins.)
7. Councit Rbports. (10 mins.)
8. Other. (10 mins.)
9. Executive Session _ Legal Matters. (20 mins.)
10. Adjournment - S:00 p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECi iObr-rNruECI
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSTONwrLL BE oN ruEsDAy,7tlstss, aeGrururruc lr i:oo i.li. ,ilii;i 6-ouucr_ cHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONWILL BE ON TUESDAY,TI2OIgg, BEGINNING AT 2:OO NM. irI iiiJ'CiiUruCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXTVAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENTNG MEETINGWLL BE ON TUESDAY,TI2OIgg, BCGrNr.rrNC ArZ:OO C.M. r'r.r i<JVIiiUHCIL CHAMBERS.
Sigr language interpretation available upon req-uJst-wiin7+-n6ur notiftcation. please cail 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
I
t.
T
1.
2.
3.
Russell Forrest
Piet Pieters
4.
Russell Forrest
FILE /j/iPY
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1999
7:OO P.M. IN Tov coUNcIL GHAMBERS
AGENDA
NOTE: Times of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be reried upon todetermlne at what time couhtif wifl consfoe'rlan item.
CITIZEN PART|CIpATtON. (5 mins.)
CONSENTAGENDA: (S mins.)A. Approve the Minutes tlom t1e meetings of June 1 and 15, 1999.B. Ordinance No. 1 5, Series of f Sgg. seionO reading of anordinance Repearing ordinance No. t+, series o'f tsg4, RnaReenacting A False Alarm Ordinance.
The three design teams will present their community facility designconcepts to the Town councir and the vail Recreatibn District Board.(2 hrs.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Review Design Concepts
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: On June grh, 9rh, and 10h three designteams consisting of architects, planners, and economists developedconcepts for siting community uses on lands within the Town orvair.This was a creative brain stoiming p."""saOn .trn" 10,n the teamspresented their conceots. The purpose of the councir meetingL; .luty o"is to simply present the ideas air""i|v to th;;;" Gopncir and the VailRecreation District Board. The sugjesteJ neri.t"p, after the July 66meeting includes:
Anaryzing each arternative based on a set of criteria outined inthe charette instructions.
Deveroping a staff recommendation with input from the communityand the community facilities team on what team shoutO beselected and what ideas should be acted on and when.Staff will review the recommendation *itt, tt " Council "nJin"VRD Board.
The Town Council and the VRD Board will determlne what ideasto act on and what design team should be selected.
ordinance No. 16, series of.1ggg, flrst reading of an ordinance to Designate4 Properties in the Town of vair as op"n sp"-"" as per section 13.1 1 of theTown of Vait Charter (See Exhibit ni. tS nii"rl-
ACTION RE.UESTED OF. COUNCIL: Approve or disapprove of OrdinanceNo' 16, series of 1999 which woura, it Jfrrov-ei prace 4 properties in thedesignated open space status.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: On April30h, the Town of VailOpen SpaceBoard of rrustees met and. unanimouirv
"ppiou"o a recommendation to theTown councir ro consider designaring rino i[ tne i"w"
"i v;it"J;;is;.,iil0open space as per Section .l 3. 1 1 of the Town of Vail Charte, * M;y;,1999, the Town Council, at,a regularly scheduLO work session, reviewedthe proposed properties and a mijority of the Town councir directed staff tomove fonrard w*h the .designateO- open- "j"* pro""ss for the fourproperties identified in ordinance ro. oieort-rie malor reasonsio, initi"tifr
5.
George Ruther
Nen Gwathmey
this process is to furfit.th.e Town's commitment to prace the portion of the
$::]!,:il::sh
propertv that wirr b" ;;;i;;; park in rhe desisnated open
srAFF RECOMMENDATTONS:Approve ordinance No. 16, series of 1999on first reading.
ordinance No' 10, Series of 1ggg, first reading of an ordinance repearinga nd re-en a ctins ordi n a nce No. 1 7, s "ii"l"i i-gss, st;;f D;;"iJp-,i"ntDistrict No. 7, The Maniott's r,,rorni..:n'i-J.iiat Vair, amending and re_estabrishing the Approved oeveropment-Fi"n
'n
accordance with section . . .
12-94-10 of the Zoning.Regurations to "rioi'ior tn" interior and exteriorremoder of the existing hoter and *,e con"til"tion of the oo; ail"'Ctub, and setting forth detaits i" ,"g"Jih;r!io. (SO mins.)
ACTTON REeUESTFDOFI:OUNC_|L: Approve, approve with conditionsor deny ordinance No. 10, Series of rgggiin nrjt,!ioi"g --.-,. --,'v,rr
BACKGROUND MTTONALE: On Monday, March B, 1999, the Town of VailPlanning & Environmentar commisriri' i"iri"*"d and recommendedapprovarof the proposed major amendment to bpeciat o""a"pri.iEir,r,.,No'7, The Marriott, pursuant to section 12-16-6 of tne rown Jivliii"","gRegulations.
The Pranning & Environmentar commission's recommendation of approvalwas based upon the ,"_"].".I "Jll: nin" O""lgn cnreria ouilined in the staffmemorandum' Having, rwiewed the criteri", ti. co-ri."i." ?"ir"i iiir, *,"proposed major amendment to Special Oevetopmenr District No. 7 complieswith the nine design criteria outrined i" s""ti",irz-gA_g of the Town orVailMunicipar code. Additionary, lhe
"ppri""nt .iJmonstrated to the satisfactionof the commission that any adverse'enects oi tne requested deviation from
lilXffi?l$ffii:i1ffi :d
o r t n e u n oeitvi "s' ;
"
i
"s
li" t,t'""ig i'?i'iv' t "
The Pranning & Environmentar commission's recommendation canied withit twelve conditions of approval. r" ,".p"""L t" "r.""g""';;" ;T;il",by the appricant' the councir, on .l*tli;i Jrimrnatec six of the orisinalconditions. The remaining conotions
"r "ppLr*i "i"'r*iii."s"J,,J"
rui
"Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999.
On June B, 1999, the Town of Vail Design Review Board fonryarded itsrecommendation of approval to the iown Councir- - in" -.etJro,"
recommendation carried with it six recommenoations for the counci'sconsideration. The councir considereJin"'b-o"ro,, recommendation onJune zznd and wit fonruard direction t" *'" g; as part of rhe ordinancereview process.
sTAFF REcOMMEN"i,r.jg,\_Ile Community Devetopment Departmentrecommends that the Councit approve OrdinancL N". 10, S;;;;;;6;i;:",presented on first reading.
Ordinance No. 1 7, Series of 19gg, first reading of an Ordinance Anordinance Authorizino ttre conveyan.L .ii"Iiitre of the Redsandstone creek Larid ana rmprovem"ntr'r-nii"on owned by the TownOf Vail and Fully Described As Follows:
A parcel of land within the NE V:SF %section 1, Township 5 South, Ranse:l ,T,i"*l.e sixth principat Nr"r,oil", E"gi" iounty, Cotorado, describid
Beginning at a point on the s,outherly line of said NE % sE % section 1, saidpoint arso being the ru.ortnwesteity ;";;; Brock D, Lion,s Ridoesubdivision, accordino ro the map tn"'b"r *"i"[! in Book 215 at page 6i8in the office of the Eigte County, C"i.r"Ol, Cflrr and Recorder; thence,
o.
Tom Moorhead
I
I
9"f:1lq said Southerty tine, N22.33,00" W 84.13 feet; thence N49.45,28"E 55'05 feet; rhence s3.as teet atong the
"r"n
oi " "ure to the right, having
3,119i11of-200'00 feet, a centrar anlb of 15'25'31" and a chord that bearsN57'28'16' E 53.69 feet; thence qtlgo reet
""nb ,n" arc of a curve ro theright, having a radius of 27.00 feet, " ";"tr"t ;n_gle of 88.54,26,,, and a chorclthat bears s70"21'44" E3z.B2feet, thence siE;!+'ste fi7.47 feet to thesaid. southerry rine of the NE u sE y, section i, saio line arso beino thenortherly line of said Btock D; thence,
"r"ng ";id li* sti:ie;# * ilio]lj,feet to the point of beginning, containi;t0:3*; acres, more or less.
Il:-!:{n9r of lhe above described parcet are basedN87"48'35' E on the southerty tine orine r.if'% sE %R81W, per the ptat of Lion's niage SubOivlion. '
ACTTON REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Consider ordinance No. 17, seriesof 1999,'.authorizing conveyance of fee title to ftre-nej sandstone Creekaffordable housing development, on first readint.
- '--'
BACKGROUND RATTONALE:. Vairrown charter, section 4.8, requiresthat the
_sare
of any rear property must be au*rorizeJoy ordinance. Thisordinance wiil authorize the Town rrl|"n"gur io ;nGiinto contracts andconveyance of the real property which conslitute the Red Sandstone Creeiaffordabre housing project. This project is essentiaty comprete and waitingfinar inspection and certificate of occupancv. ll'n-"" been deveropedpursuant to. previously approved SDD #33 and the IntergovernmentalAgreement between the Eagle River water a saniiaiion District and theTown of Vail.
srAFF RECOMMENDATToN: Approve ordinance No. 17, series of 1ggg,as presented on first reading.
Town Manager,s Report. (5 mins.)
Adjournment _ 10:00 p.m.
NorEupcoMrNcmM"E^Elll!9,"r^Ii[Ll,ly',r"1,?F*p*,
THE NExr vAtl- rowlr?oulrdrfnEcur_nn woRK sEsstoNWILL BE ON TUESDAY,TII3I}I,AECTNNiNCEJ}]OO P.T,,I. !N TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSTONWILL BE ON TUESDAY,TI2OIgg, EECiNI,IING=Ai-;IO P.M.IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXTVAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwlLL BE oN TuEsDAy,tt2otss,eecNNil6;i;-,oo p.rrrr. rN Tov couNcrl GHAMBERS.
fl?nlt:eTJil?ni"rBlilavailable upon rJq[eiifritF z? F'our notirication. ptease cail 47e-2332 voice
C:\AGENOA TC
on a bearing of
Section 1, TSS,
7.
8.
mwxqFwn
75 South Frcntage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2100
FN(970-479-2157
July 2, 1999
Mr. Cilbert McNeish
Grirnshaw & Haning, P.C.
One Norwest Center
1700 Lincoln Sfeet, Suite 3800
Denver, Colorado 802034538
Re: Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999, I,Ianiott Redevelopment Proposal
Dear Gil,
Enclosed please find the information requested by Phil Quatrochi with regard to the N{arriott Redevelopment
Proposal.
As requested, I have included within the packet copies of the development review applications (major sdd
amendment, conditional use permit, and design review), the appticant's original written statement describing the
proposal, the staff memorandum to the Planning & Enviroffnental Commission dated March 8, 1999, and tle staff
memorandum and draft ordinsnce reviewed by the Council on June 22.
You will also find enclosed a copy of the final &aft of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1999. Ordinance No. l0willbe
considered by the Vail Town Council at the aftemoon worksession and then on first reading at the evening meeting
onluly 6. I have enclosed a copy ofthe Vail Town Council's agenda for Tuesday, July 6, 1999'
Should you have any questions or concems, please do not hesiate to call. You can reach me most easily by
telephone at 97 0 47 9 -21 45.
Sincerely,
--.
-nFcupy
fJry-eetul
George Ruther, AICP
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
{j*oourr "o
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1999
2:00 p.M. AT TOV cOUNctL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Time of ltems are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be refiddupon to determine at what time Council wili consider ai item.
1.
George Ruther
Henry Pratt
2.
George Ruther
Rob Levine
F IL E /j/lPY
A work session discussion to present a draft of Ordinance No. 10,Series of 1999, an ordinance repealing and re-enacting Ordinance
l-o 'lZ,Series of 1995, Speciat Devet6pment District tio. 7, TheManiott's Mountain Resort a!vair, amending and re-estabrishinl
!h9 AqRroved Development plan in accorda-nce with Section 1219A-10 of the Zoning Regulations to allow for the interior and
exterior remodel of the existing hoter and the construction of theGore Creek Club, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (30
mins.)
The purpose of the work session discussion is to present the draftordinance to the councir and for the councir to provide feedback
on the draft to the applicant and staff.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Listen to a presentation onthe ordinance by the staff and engage in a discussion to identifyareas of concem and to provide feedback to the applicant andstaff.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: please see the memo to the VailTown Council from the Community Development Department fordetails on the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: As this is a work session and not afinal review, the Community Development Department will not beforwarding a recommendation to the councir at this time. staffwill forward a recommendation at the time of final review.
A work session discussion to present a proposal for the
redevelopment of the Anflers Condominiums, located at 6g0 WestLionshead Place. (30 mins.)
The purpose of ihe work session discussion is to present theproposal to the Council and for the Council to provide feedback onthe proposal to the applicant and staff.
The.applicant is scheduled to appear back before the plannino &Environmental Commission on Monday, June 2gth tor tne nnat- -
!1vily of a request to estabtish Speciai Development District No.37, The Antlers.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Listen to a briefpresentation on the redevelopment proposal by the staff and theapplicant and then engage in a discussion to identify areas ofconcern and to provide feedback to the applicant and staff.
BACKGROUND MTTONALE: On Monday, June 14h, theapplicant appeared before the planning & Hnvironmental
Commission for a work session to discuss the redevelopmentproposal for the Anilers Condominiums. The applicant hadappeared before the Commission on several pi&ious occasions
to work through the details of the project.
3.
George Ruther
4.
Tom Moorhead
Bob Mclaurin
Fred Lutz, TCI
A memorandum to the Vail Town Council ouflining the details ofthe redevelopment proposat anC OescriUin! tfrl'review process todate has been attached for reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this is a work session and not afinal review, the Community Developmentb"p"rtr"nt will not beforwarding a recommendation to md CounciiJt this time. Staffwill forward a recommendation at me time oi nnal review.
DRB Report. (1S mins.)
Consideration of Amendment of TCI Franchise Agreement.(45 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: provide staff direction inresolving issues concerning amendment to tne caOle televisionfranchise agreement.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE: The franchise agreement betweenTCI and the Town of Vail.required that the "iirtiig cable system
P," "rq"n999 wirhout digitat iompression, utiiiiing nUer optc ca'Urethroughout the system.
fjf. nas upgraded the system, utilizing fiber optics and by use ofdigital compression has expanded aviirabre services. rnis
I,]_tl!:" ddigital. compression to achieve ttre'expanOeO servicerequtres an amendment to the franchise agreement.
6.
7.
8.
5. Newspaper Box Update. (15 mins.)Tom Moorhead
Information Update. (10 mins.)
Council Reports. (10 mins.)
Other. (10 mins.)
Adjournment - S:OS p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:(ALL TTMES ARE AppRoxtMATE AND SUBJEeT TO CHANGE)
THENEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwlLL BE oN TUESDAY, T/6/99, aeerNNlN'd nr z:oo p.ii.ir.r-iov douructL CHAMBERS.
THE FOL_LOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwrLL BE ON TUESDAY,Ttlstss,eeerNNrNc Ar z:ddi.M. iN iiiii'durucrL GHAMBERS.
THE NE_XT VA]L TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwlLL BE oN TUESDAY, 7/6/ee, are TNNiNG- ar z:oo F.ii.lliciii criirHctL cHAMBER'.
sign language interpretation available upon re!'ue-stlanrrT+15ur notification. please cail 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for intormition. -----' .'
9.
o
MEMORANDT'M
To: Vail Toum Comcil
From: George Ruther, Senior Planner
Date: June 22, 1999
Re: MarriottRedevelopnrntProposal
On Tuesday, June 156 the applicant met with the Town Council to begin discussions on the rcdevelopment of the
Marriott and the construction of the Gore C:reek Club.
Following a visit to the developlr.ent site and a pesentation on the poposal, the Council idmtified the following
iszues that they wanted the applicant to ad&ess:
l. Ioading and delivery needed to be pwided for the Gore (teek Club in addition to the front &opoffarea
to the Club.
2. A roofneeded to be consructed owr the exi*ing loading and delivery area for the hotel to screen the area
fromview.
3. The applicmt should consider increasing the employee generatim muhiplier from 30/o to sfflo to incr€ase
the availability of affordable housing.
4. Tbe applicant sbould give ftrtber attention to the west elevation of the Gore Creek Club to minimize the
'canym effecf" along the weS properfy line.
The Council also requested tbat staffpresent additional inforrnation on how the off-site Lnpacts to the Frmtagei Road intersectims were detcrmined In response to Council's request, staffhas prepared amemorandrm describing
in geater detail how the Fronlage Road intersection impovements were estimated. The rnernorandum was pepared
in cooperation with the applicant.
I
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL FIL T coPy
TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 1999
2:00 p.M. AT TOV COUNCTL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Time of ltems are approximate, subJect to change, and cannot be reriedupon to determine atwhat time Council wili consider an item.
1' site Visit and Discussion of proposed Marriott Redeveropment.George Ruther (1 hr., 30 mins.)
ITEM/TOPIC:
A work session discussion to present the proposed
redeveropment of the Marriott Mountain Resort at vair and thenew construction of the Gore creek ctub. The purpose of the,meeting is to present the proposal to the Gouncil and for thecouncil to provide feedback on the proposar to the appricantand staff.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
Listen to a presantation on the proposal by the applicant andengage in a discussion to identify areas of concern and to provide
feedback to the applicant and staff.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
On.Monday, March 8, 1999, the Town of Vail planning &Environmentar commission reviewed and recommended apprivalof lltg proqosj.d major amendment to Speciat DevelopmentDistrict No.7, The Marriott, pursuant to section 12-16-6 bf theTown of Vail Zoning Regulations.
The Pranning & Environmentar commission's recommendation ofapproval. was based upon review of the nine design criteriaouilined in the staff memorandum. Having reviewed tfie criteria,the commission found that the proposed- major amendment tospeciar Deveropment District No. 7 compries with tne nine designcriteria ouflined in section 12-9A-g of the Town of Vail Municip"al
Code. Additionally, the applicant demonstrated to the satisfactionof the Commission that any adverse effects of the requesteddeviation from the development standards of the undertyingzoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided.
The Pranning & Environmeniar commission's recommendation
carried with it twerve conditions of approvar. The conditions of thecommission's approvar are found in'section 6, of ordinance No.10, Series of 1999.
A copy of the staff memorandum and the finar agenda from theMarch gth meeting are enclosed for reference.
On Wednes.d.ay, May 19, 1999, following four conceptual reviewmeetings with the Design Review Board, the Board agreed torecommend conceptual approval of the proposed projedt to theTown councir. The Board's recommendation canied with it sixrecommendations for the councirs consideration. The sixrecommendations of the Board are ouilined in the memorandumto the Vair rown councir from the Town of Vair Design ReviewBoard, dated June g, 1999. A final review of the proposed planswit be reguired at a future date by the Design Review Board. .Acopy of the memorandum is enclosed for refeience.
K SESSION
I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As this is a work session and not a final review, the CommunityDevelopment, Department will not be forwarding arecommendation to the councir at this time. staff wiil fon,'rard arecommendation at the time of final review.
2. Future of Vail,s Marketing Discussion. (30 mins.)Bob Mclaurin \vv !""'e',
' pam Brandmeyer
3. DRB Review. (15 mins.)
George Ruther
Discussion of Ordinance No. 15, Series of 1999, an OrdinanceRegarding False Alarms. (10 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: present draft ordinanceand update on process. This ordinance witt Ue on for first readingat the June 15, 1 ggg, evening meeting.
5. Discussion of a new Housing Zone District and potentiar changesDominic Mauriello to Employee Housing Chapter (30 mins.)
ITEM/TOPIC:
Discussion of potential text changes to the Emptoyee
!ou9! n g re g ulation.s, the primary/Secondary a riO fwo-f am ilyResidential zones districts, and ihe Noncontorming UseSection of the Zoning Regulations.
Additionally, discussion of a new Affordable Housing zonedistrict.
ACTION REQUESTED OF GOUNCIL:
Provide siaff with direction on whether to pursue code
amendments through the normal review process.
BACKGROUND RATIONALE:
See backup materials included in your packet.
Information Update. (10 mins.)
Council Reports. (10 mins.)
Other. (10 mins.)
Adjournment - S:2S p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TTMES BELOW:(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwrLL BE ON TUESDAY, 6/15199, eeetNiilNc er z:oo p.M. rH iOV COUHCTL CHAMBERS.
THE FOI I OWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwlLL BE oN TUESDAY,6t22tsg, eeetNiltl.lc er z:oo p.M. irl rtiv C'dunctl cHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETiNGwLL BE ON TUESDAY, 6r1sr99, eeeri.il,ilNc er z:ooF.M. ru fdV C6UNCL CHAMBERS.
sig^n language r1lerpretation available upon requJslwttn?a n6ur notification. please cau 47g-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for information.
4.
Dick Duran
o.
7.
8.
9.
ORDINANCE NO.3
Serles of 1999
AN ORD]NANCE AMENDING TITLE 12, ZONING REGULATIONS, BY ADDING TWO NEWzoNE DlsrRlcrs As cHAprER zH: L|oNSHEAD MtxED usE 1 DlsrRtcr AND
CHAPTER 7I: LIONSHEAD MIXED USE 2 DISTRIGT IN ORDER To IMPLEMENT THE
LIONSHEAD REDEVELOPMENT MASTER pLAN; AMENDTNG GHAPTER 2, DEFtNtTtoNs,
SECTION 12.2.2.. DEFINITIONS; AMENDING CHAPTER 4, DISTRICTS E'TABLISHED,
SECTION 12.4.1., DESIGNATED, BY ADDING LIONSHEAD MIXED USE I DTSTRICT ANb
LIONSHEAD MIXED usE 2 DtsrRlcr;AMENDING cHAprER 10, oFF-srREET pARKtNc
AND LOADING, SECTION 12.10.17: LEASING OF PARKING SPACES; AITiENDING
GHAPTER 10, OFF€TREET PARKTNG AND LOAD|NG, sEciloN 12-10-i6: ExEtuFT
AREAS; PARKING FUND ESTABLISHED; AMENDING CHAPTER 13, EMPLOYEE
HOUSING, SECTION l2-13-6: TypE ilt EMpLoyEE HOUS|NG UN|T; AMENDTNG
CHAPTER 13, EMPLOYEE HOUSING, sEcTIoN 72.13.7i wPE IV EMPLOYEE HOUSING
UNIT; AMENDING CHAPTER {4, SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, sEcTIoN 12-14.19:
SATELLITE DISH ANTENNAS;AMEND|NG CHAPTER {5, cROSs RESTDENTTAL FLOOR
AREA, sEcrloN 12-15-3: DEFtNtfloN, cALcuLATloN, AND ExcLustoNs, sEcfloN 12-15'2: GRFA REQUIREMENTS By zoNE DtsrRtGT; AMENDING TtrLE t2 slcN
REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 4, stcN cATEGoRtEs, sEcloN 114A-1: stcNs pERMtrrED
lN zoNlNG DlsrRlcrs; AND AMENDTNG TtrLE s, puBLtc HEALTH AND sAFEw,
GHAPTER I' PUBLIG NUlsANcEs, sEcrloN 5-1-7: NotsE PRoHtBtrED.
WHEREAS, the Town council desires to implement the Lionshead Redevelopment
Master Plan, adopted by the Town on December 18, 199g; and
WHEREAS, lhe Town Councilfinds that the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District and the
Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District are compatible with and suitable to adjacent uses, are
consistent.with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan, Town's Land Use plan, and Zoning
Regulations, and are appropriate for the area: and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has
recommended approval of these new zone districts at its February 22, lggg meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety, and
welfare to amend said Chapter and Sections of the Municipal Code.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINEE BYTHE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Title 12, Chapter 7, adding new Article H. Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, toread as follows:
ARTTCLE H. LTONSHEAD MTXED USE 1 (LMU-I) D|STR|CT
SEGTION:
12-7H-1: Purpose
12-7H-2: Permifted and Gondiilonal Uses; Basement Or Garden Level:
12-7H-3: Permltted and condiflonal uses; Flrst Froor or straet Level:12-7H4: Permltted and Condlfional Uses; Second Floor and Above:
12-TH-52 Condltlonal Uses; Generally
12-7H-6: Accessory Uses
12-7H-7: Exterlor Alterailons Or Modiflcailons
12-7 H-8: Compllance Burden
12-7H-9: Lot Area and Site Dlmensions
Ordlnanc€ No. 3 , Serl€s of 1999
12-7H-10: Setbacks
12-7H-11: Height and Bulk
12-7H-12: Density (dwelling units per acre)
12-7H-13: Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA)
1 2-7 H-1 4: Site Goverage
12-7H-15: Landscaping and Slte Development
12-7H-16: Parking and Loading
12-7H-17: Location Of Business Activity
12-7H-18: Mltigation of Development lmpacts
12-7H-1: PURPOSE:
The Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family
dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants,
offices, skier services, and commercial establishments in a clustered, unified development.
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District, in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan,' is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate to thepermitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable qualities of the District by
establishing appropriate site development standards. This district is meant to encourage aniprovide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master
Plan.
This zone district was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop.
The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create a economically vibrant lodging, housing, andcommercial core area. The incentives in this zone district include increaseJinillowablJgross
residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in theLionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentivesls tocreate economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with theLionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incentives are created to help financepublic off-site improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. with any
developmenVredevelopment proposal taking advantage of the incentives created herein, thefollowing amenities will be evaluated: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access,public plaza redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements.
12'7H-2: PERMITTED AND coNDtIoNAL usES; BASEMENT oR GARDEN LEVEL:A. Definition: The "basement" or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a buildingthat is entirely or substantially below grade.B' Permilted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levelswithin a structure:
Banks and financial institutions.
Commercial ski storage.
Eating and drinking establishments.
Public or private lockers and storage.
Personal services and repair shops.
Professional offices, business offices and studios.
Recreation facilities.
Retail establishments.
Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare.
Travel agencies.
Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection,in accordance with the provisions of section 12-3-4 of this Tifle.
c' Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levelswithin a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with theprovisions of Chapter 16 of this Tiile:
Conference facilities and meeting rooms.
Liquor stores.
Lodges and accommodation units.
Major arcade.
Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodgedweiling units, and emproyee housing units (Type ilr (EHU) as provided in
Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999
Section 12-13€ of this Title and Type lV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-V otthis Title).
Radio, TV stores, and repair shops.
Theaters.
Additional uses determined to be slmilar to conditional uses described in this
subsectlon, in accordance wlth the provisions of Section l2-3"{ of this
Title.
'
12'7H'3: PERMITTED AND coNDtIoNAL usES; FtRsr FLooR oR STREET LEVEL:A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building '
that is located at grade or street level along a pedestrian way.B' Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permittei on the first floor or street level
within a struclure:
Banks, with walkup teller facilities.
Eating and drinking establishments.
Recreation facilities.
Retail stores and establishments.
Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare.
Travel agencies.
Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection,in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-34 of this Tiile.
C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street level
floor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with theprovisions of Chapter 16 of this Tiile:
Financial institutions, other than banks.
Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors.
Conference facilities and meeting rooms.
Liquor stores.
Lodges and accommodation units.
Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodge
dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type lll (EHU) as provided inSection 12-13-6 of this Title and Type lV (EHUias provided in Section 't2-13-7 olthis Title).
Radio, TV stores, and repair shops.
Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this
subsection, In accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this
Title.
12'7H4: PERMITTEDAND coNDlfloNAL usES; sEcoND FLooRAND ABovE:A Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors above
the first floor within a structure:
Lodges and accommodation unlts.
Multiple-family residential dwelling units, lodge dwelling units, and employee
housing units (Type lll (EHU) as provided in Section t2-i3-6 of thls Title
1n!,- TVqe lV (EHU) as provtded in Section 12-19-7 of this Tiile).
Additional uses determinEd to be similar to permitted uses described in this
subsection, in accordance with the provisions of secflon 12-34 of thisTltle.
B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be
above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional
provisions of Chapter 16 of this Tifle:
Banks and financlal institutions.
Conference facilitles and meeting rooms.
Eating and drinking establighments.
Liquor stores.
Personal seruices and repair shops.
Ordlnanco No. 3 . So.ie8 of 1999
permitted on second floors and higher
use permit in accordance with the
Professlonal oftlc€s, business offices and studios.
Radio, TV stores, and repair shops.
Recreation facilitles.
Retail establishments.
Skier tickating, skl school, skier sotvlces, and daycare.
Tlmeshare units and fractional fee clubs.
Theaters.
Addltional uses determined to be slmilar to conditional uses descrlbed In this
subsection, in accord.ance with the provisions of section 12-3-,0 of this
4Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999
l2'7H'5: CONDITIONAL USES; GENERALLY (on all levels of a building or outside of abuilding):
The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use
permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Tiile:
Bed and breakfast as further regulated by section 12-i4-19 of this Tiile.
Brew pubs.
Coin-operated laundries.
Commercial storage.
Public or private parking lots.
Public buildings, grounds, and facilities.
Public park and recreation facilities.
Public utility and public service uses.
Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use.
Ski lifts and tows.
Television stations.
Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this
subsection, in accordance with the proviqions of Section 12-3-4 of this
Title.
12-7H-6: ACCESSORY USES:
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District:
Home occupations, subject io issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with
the provisions of Section 12-14-12 of this Tifle.
Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory io
permitted and conditional uses.
Minor arcade.
Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and drinking
establishments.
Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental
to permitted residential or lodge uses.
Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to' hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses.
Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and
necessary for the operation thereof.
12-7 H-7 : EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODr FtCATIoNS :
Review Required: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing building
shafl be reviewed by the Design Review Board in accordance with Chapter 1z-j1 ;l the Zo-ningRegulations. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units,fractional fee club units, timeshare units, any project which adds more than 1,000 sq. ft. ofcommercial floor area or common space, or any project which has substantial off-site impacts(as determined by the Administrator) shall be reviewed by the planning and Environmenial
Commission as a Major Exterior Alteration in accordance with this ChJpter and Section 12-3-6:tlearings. Any project which requires a condilional use permit shall also obtain approval of the
Pfanning and Environmental Commission in accordance with Chapter 12-16 of the ZoningRegulations. Compleie applications for major exterior alterations shall be submitted in
accordance with administrative schedules developed by the community Development
lepartment for Planning and Environmental Commission and Design tieview Board review.The following submittal items are required;
1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building
owner's authorized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator. A-ny
application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized bythe condominium
association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the condominium
association's declarations.
2. Application; Contents: An application for an exterior alteration shall include the
following:
a. Completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property
Ordlnance No. 3 , Sgries of 1999
located adjacent to the subject parcel. The owners list shall include the names
of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property owned by
each, and a general description of the property (including the name of the
property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the condominium
association's represenlative (if applicable). said names and addresses shall be
obtained from the cunent tax records of Eagle county as they appeared not
more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittat date.
b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies
with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and any other reievant sections
of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on the
property including the location of improvements, topography, and natural
features.
d. A current title report to verify ownership, easements, and other
encumbrances, including Schedules A and 83.
e. Existing and proposed site plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet
(1" = 20'), a vicinity plan at an appropriate scale to adequately show ihe project
location in relationship to the surrounding area, a landscape plan at a minimum
scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1" = 20'), a roof height plan and existing and
proposed building elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equils one
foot (1/8" = 1'). The material listed above shall include adjacent buildings and
improvements as necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance witn tne
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
f. sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall
equinox (March 21lSeptember 23) and winter solstice (December ziy at ten
o'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'clock (2:00) p.M. unless the Department of
community Development determines that the proposed addition has no impact
on the existing sun/shade pattem. The following sun angle shall be used whenpreparing this analysis:
Spring/Fall
Equinox
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Winter
Solstice
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Sun Angle
40" east of south, 50" declination
42" west of south, 50" declination
Sun Angle
30" east of south, 20' declination
30" west of south, 20" declination
g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a minimum scale of one-fourth inch
equals one foot (114" = 1') and a square footage analysis of all existing andproposed uses.
h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed development. said modelshall include buildings and major site improvements on adjacent properties asdeemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model ,niil oe ""determined by the Administrator.
i. Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the specialrelationship of the proposed development to adjacent properties, publi" .p"s"r,and adopted views per Chapter 22 of this Title.
j. Parking needs assessment and vehicular circulation analysis, prepared by aqualifi ed professional.
k' Any additional information or materiar as deemed necessary by theAdministrator or the Town planning and Environmental commission (pEC). TheAdministrator or the Planning and Environmental commission ,"y, "i t i"ln". ot.their discretion, waive certain submittal requirements if it is determihec tnlt tne
6Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999
requirements are not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
4' Work Sessions/Conceptual Review: lf requested by either the applicant or the
Administrator, submittals may proceed to a work session with the planning and
Environmental Commission, a conceptual review with the Design Review Board, or a
worksession with the Town Council.
5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission shall
be held in accordance with Section 12-3-6 ol this Title. The Planning and Enviropmental
Commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with
conditions or modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the Planning and
Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council in accordance with
Section 12-3-3 of this Tiile.
6' Lapse Of Approval: Approval of an exterior alteration as prescribed by this Article
shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approvjl by the Design
Review Board unless, prior to the expiration, a building permit is issued and construciion
is commenced and diligently pursued to completion. Administrative extensions shall be
allowed for reasonable and unexpected delays as long as code provisions affecting theproposal have not changed.
12-7H-8': COMPLIANGE BURDEN:
It shall be lhe burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the
Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed
exterior alteration or new development is in compliancewith the purposes of the Lionshead
Mixed Use 1 District, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant
negative affects on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal subltantially
complies with other applicable elements of the Vail comorehensive plan.
12-7H-92 LOT AREA AND S|TE DTMENSTONS:
The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area.
12-7H-10: SETBAGKS:
The minimum building setbacks shall be ten feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan as a build-to line.
12-7-H-11: HEIGHT AND BULK:
Buildings shall have a maximum average building height of 71' with a maximum height of g2.5,,
as further defined by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. All development ihall compiywith the design guidelines and standards found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
Flexibility with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan,
shall be afforded to redevelopment projects which meet the intent of design guidelines, asreviewed and approved by the Design Review Board.
12-7H-122 DENSITY (dwelllng unlts per acre):
Up toa 33% increase over the existing number of dwelling units on a property or 35 dwelling units per
acre, whichever is greater shall be allowed. For the purpose of calculaiing density, eriptoyee' housing units, accommodation units, timeshare units, and fractional fee club units shall not becounted as dwelling units. Additionally, a lodge dwelling unit, as defined herein, shall be
counted as 250/o of a dwelling unit for the purpose of caiculating density.
12-7H-13t cROSS RESTDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA):
Up le250 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area shall be allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of buildable sitearea, or an increase of 33% over the existing GRFA found on the properiy, whichever is
Ordinanca No. 3 , Seriss of 1999
greater. Multiple-family dwelling units in this zone district shall not be entifled to additional
Gross Residential FloorArea underthe 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5, of the Municipal Code.
12-7H-1 4: SITE COVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total site area, unless otheruise
specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
12-7H-15:LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOpMENT:
At least twenty percent (20o/o) ol the total site area shall be landscaped, unless othennriie
specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
12-VH-16: PARKING AND LOADING:
. Off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Tifle. At'least one-half (1/2) the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings.
12-7H-17: LOCATION OF BUSINESS ACTtVtTy:A. Limitations; Exception: All offices, businesses and services permitted by zone district,
shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclosed
parking or loading areas, the outdoor display of goods, or outdoor restaurant seating.
B. Outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly infront of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment,s ownproperty. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed
by outdoor display.
12-7H-18: MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMpAGTS:
Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts of their
development on public infrastructure and in all cases mitigation snall bear a reasonable relation
to the development impacts. lmpacts may be determined based on reports prepared byqualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity improvements shall be
balanced with the goals of redeveldpment and will be determined Oy itre planning and
Environmental commission in review of development projects and ionditional usie permits.
Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, the following: roadway improvements,
pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, stream tracubank
improvements, public art improvements, and similar improvements. The intent of thissection is to only require mitigation for large scale redevelopmenUdevelopment projectswhich produce substantial off-site impacts.
Section 2.
as follows:
Title 12, chapter 7, adding new Article l. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, to read
ARTICLE L LTONSHEAD MTXED USE 2 (tMU-z) D|STR|CT
SEGTION:
12-71-1: Purpose
12-71-2: Permitted and conditional uses; Basement or Garden Levelr
12-71-3: Permitted and conditional uses; First Floor or street Level:
12-714'. Permitted and Conditional Uses; Second Floor and Above:
12-71-5: Conditlonal Uses; Generally
12-7 16: Accessor,y Uses
12-7 l-7 : Exterior Alterations O r Mod lfications
12-71-8: Compfiance Burden
12-71-9:. Lot Area and Site Dimens.lons
12-71-10: Setbacks
12-71-11: Height and Bulk
12-71-12t Density (dwelling unlts per acre)
12-71-13: Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA)
12-71-142 Site Coverage
Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999
12-71-152 Landscaping and Site Development
12-71-16: Parking and Loadlng
12-71-172 Locatlon Of Business Activity
12-71-18: Mitigation of Development lmpacts
12-71-1: PURPOSE:
The Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District is intended to provide sites for a mixture of multiple-family
dwellings, lodges, hotels, fractional fee clubs, timeshares, lodge dwelling units, restaurants,
offices, skier services, light industrial activities, and commercial establishments in a cluslered,
unified development. Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District, in accordance with the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan, is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space and other
amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses and to maintain the desirable
qualities of the District by establishing appropriate site development standards. This district is
meant to encourage and provide incentives for redevelopment in accordance with the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
This zone district was specifically developed to provide incentives for properties to redevelop.
The ultimate goal of these incentives is to create a economically vibranl lodging, housing, and
commercial core area. The incentives in this zone district include increases in allowable gross
residential floor area, building height, and density over the previously established zoning in
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan study area. The primary goal of the incentives is to
create economic conditions favorable to inducing private redevelopment consistent with the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Additionally, the incenlives are created to help finance
public, off-site, improvements adjacent to redevelopment projects. Public amenities which will
be evaluated with redevelopment proposals taking advantage of the incentives created herein
may include: streetscape improvements, pedestrian/bicycle access, public plaza
redevelopment, public art, roadway improvements, and similar improvements.
12-71-22 PERMITTED AND coNDtloNAL usES; BASEMENT oR GARDEN LEVEL:A. Definition: The 'lbasement' or "garden level" shall be defined as that floor of a building
that is entirely or substantially below grade.B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels
within a structure;
Banks and financial institutions.
Commercial ski storage.
Eating and drinking establishments.
Public or private lockers and storage.
Personal services and repair shops.
Professional offices, business offices and studios.
Recreation facilities.
Retail establishments.
Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare.
Travel agencies.
Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection,in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3-4 of this Tifle.
C. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in basement or garden levels
within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with theprovisions of Chapter 16 of this Tiile:
Conference facilities and meeting rooms.
Liquor stores.
Lodges and accommodation units.
Major arcade.
Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractionalfee clubs, lodge
dwelling units, and employee housing units (Type lll (EHU) as provided inSection 12-13-6 of this Title and Type lV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13-7 olthis Title).
Radio, W stores, and repair shops.
Theaters.
IOtdlnance No. 3 , S€ries of 1999
o
Additional uses determined to be similar to conditionar uses described in thissubsection, in accordance with the provisions of section 12-3-,{ of thisTitle.
12-7t-3: PERMITTED AND coNDtfloNAL usES; FIRST FLooR oR STREET LEVEL:A. Definition: The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of tne UuiiOingthat is located at grade or street level along a pedestrian way.B. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street levelwithinastructure: :'--
Banks, with walkup teller facilities.
Eating and drinking establishments.
Recreation facilities.
Retail stores and establishments.
Skier ticketing, ski school, skier services, and daycare.
Travel agencies.
Additional uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in this subsection,in accordance with the provisions of section 12-3-4 of this Tifle.
C. Conditional Uses; The following uses shall be permitted on the first floor or street levelfloor within a structure, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with theprovisions of Chapter 16 of this Tifle:
Financial institutions, other than banks.
Barbershops, beauty shops and beauty parlors.
Conference facilities and meeting rooms.
Liquor stores.
Lodges and accommodation units.
Multiple-family residential dwelling units, timeshare units, fractional fee clubs, lodgedwe[ing units, and emproyee housing units (Type ilr (EHU) as provided in"Sectlon 12-13-6 of this Title and Type lV (EHUj as provided in Section 12-13-7 olthis Title).
Radio, ,TV stores, and repair shops.
Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in thissubsection, in accordance with the provisions of section 12-3-4 of thisTitle.
12-71'4: PERMtfiED AND coNDtIoNAL USES; sEcoND FLooR AND ABovE:A Permitted Uses; Exception: The following uses shall be permitted on those floors abovethe first floor within a structure:
Lodges and accommodation units.
Multiple-famiry residentiar dweiling units, rodge dwelring units, and emproyeehousing units (Type ltl (EHU) as providld in secti-on 12-1g-6 of tiis iiue1nO Type tV (EHU) as provided in Section 12-13_7 of this Tifie).Additionaf uses determined to be similar to permitted uses described in thlssubsection, in accordance with the provlsions of section 12-3.4 of thisTitle.
B conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on second floors and higherabove grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in "c"oiJ"n"" with theprovisions of Chapter 16 of this Tille:
Banks and financial institutions
Conference facilities and meeting rooms.
Eating and drinking establishments.
Liquor stores.
Personal services and repair shops.
Professional offices, business offices and studios.
Radio, TV stores, and repair shops,
Recreation facilities.
Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 10
t
Retail establishments.
Skier ticketing, ski school, skler services, and daycare.
Tlmeshare units and fractional fee clubs.
Theaters.
Addltional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this
subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-3.4 of this
Title.
12-715: coNDtrloNAL USES; GENERALLY (on all levels of a buitding or outside of a
buildlng):
The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use
permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Tifle:
Bed and breakfast as further regulated by section 12-14-19 of this Tifle.
Brew pubs.
Coin-operated laundries.
Commercial storage.
Gasoline and service stations.
Public or private parking lots.
Public buildings, grounds, and facilities.
Public park and recreation facilities.
Public utility and public service uses.
Private outdoor recreation facilities, as a primary use.
Ski lifts and tows.
Television stations.
Vehicle maintenance, service, repair, sto;.age, and fueling.
Warehousing.
Additional uses determined to be similar to conditional uses described in this
subsection, in accordance with the provisions of Section ,,2-34 of this
Title.
12-T l-Gz ACCESSORY USES :
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District:
Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with
the provisions of Section 1Z-14-12 of this Tifle.
Loading and delivery and parking facilities customarily incidental and accessory to
permitted and conditional uses.
Minor arcade.
Outdoor dining areas operated in conjunction with permitted eating and Orlnting
establishments.
Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreation facilities customarily incidental
to permitted residential or lodge uses.
Offices, lobbies, laundry, and other facilities customarily incidental and accessory to
hotels, lodges, and multiple-family uses.
Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and
necessary for the operation thereof.
12-7 l-7 : EXTERIOR ALTERATTONS OR MOOtFtcATtoNS :
Review Required: The construction of a new building or the alteration of an existing building
shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board in accordance with Chapter 12-1 1 ;f the Zo-ningRegulations. However, any project which adds additional dwelling units, accommodation units,
fractional fee club units, timeshare units, any project which adds irore than 1,000 sq. ft. of
commercial floor area or cornmon space, or any project which has substantial off-site impacts(as determined by the Administrator) shall be reviewed by the Planning and Environmental
Commission as a Major Exterior Alteration in accordancewith this ChJpter and Section 12-3-6:tlearings. Any project which requires a conditional use permit shall also obtain approval of the
Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with Chapter 12-16 of the Zoning
Regulations. Complete applications for major exterior alterations shall be submitted in
accordance with administrative schedules developed by the community Development
Department for Planning and Environmental Commission and Design tieview Board review.
Ordlnanc€ No. 3 , Series of 1999 11
The following submittal items are required:
1. Application: An application shall be made by the owner of the building or the building
owner's authorized agent or representative on a form provided by the Administrator. Any
application for condominiumized buildings shall be authorized by the condominium
association in conformity with all pertinent requirements of the condominium
association's declarations.
2. Application; contents: An application for an exterior alteration shall include the
following:
a. completed application form, filing fee, and a list of all owners of property
located adjacent to the subject parcel. The owners list shall include the names
of all owners, their mailing address, a legal description of the property owned by
each, and a general description of the property (including the name of the
property, if applicable), and the name and mailing address of the condominium
association's representalive (if applicable). Said names and addresses shall be
obtained from the current tax records of Eagle county as they appeared not ,
more than thirty (30) days prior to the application submittal date.
b. A written statement describing the proposal and how the proposal complies
with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and any other relevant sections
of the Vail Comprehensive Plan.
c. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions on theproperty including the location of improvements, topography, and natural
features.
d. A current title report to verify ownership, easements. and olher
encumbrances, including Schedules A and 83.
e. Existing and proposed site plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals 20 feet(1" = 20'), a vicinity pran at an appropriate scare to adequately show ihe project
location in relationship lo the surrounding area, a landscape ptan at a minimum
scale of one inch equals 20 feet (1'l = 20'), a roof height plan and existing andproposed building elevations at a minimum scale of one-eighth inch equils onefoot (1/8" = 1'). The material listed above shall include adja-cent buildings and
improvements as necessary to demonstrate the project's compliance with theLionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
f. sun/shade analysis of the existing and proposed building for the spring/fall
equinox (March 21lseptember 23) and winter solstice (December 21) atleno'clock (10:00) A.M. and two o'crock (2:00) p.M. unress the Department ofcommunity Development determines that the proposed addition has no impacton the existing sun/shade pattern. The following sun angle shall be used whenpreparing this analysis:
Spring/Fall
Equinox
10:00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Winter
Solstice
10;00 A.M.
2:00 P.M.
Sun Angle
40" easl of south, S0. declination
42" west of south, 50" declination
Sun Angle
30' east of south, 20" declination
30" west of south, 20. deciination
g. Existing and proposed floor plans at a minimum scale of one-fourth inchequals one foot (114" = 1',) and a square footage analysis of all existing andproposed uses.
h. An architectural or massing model of the proposed development. said modelshall include buildings and major site imprwements on adjacent properties asdeemed necessary by the Administrator. The scale of the model 'rnJrr n" ".determined by the Administrator.
Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 12
t
i. Photo overlays and/or other graphic material to demonstrate the special
relationship of the proposed development to adjacent properties, public spaces,
and adopted views per Chapter 22 of this Tifle.
j. Parking needs assessment and vehicular circulation analysis, prepared by a
qualified professional.
k. Any additionaFinformation or material as deemed necessary by the
Administrator or the Town Planning and Environmental commission (pEC). The
Administrator or the Planning and Environmental Commission may, at his/her or
their discretion, waive certain submittal requirements if it is determined that the
requirements are not relevant to the proposed development nor applicable to the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
4. work sessions/conceptual Review: lf requested by either the applicant or the
Administrator, submittals may proceed to a work session with the planning ano
Environmental commission, a conceptual review with the Design Review Board, or a
worksession with the Town Council.
5. Hearing: The public hearing before the Planning and Environmental Commission shall
be held in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of this Title. The Planning and Environmental
commission may approve the application as submitted, approve the application with
conditions or modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the planning and
Environmental commission may be appealed to the Town council in accordance with
Section 12-3-3 of this Titre.
6- Lapse Of Approval: Approval of an exterior alteration as prescribed by this Article
shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date of approval by the Design
Review Board unless, prior to the expiration, a building permit is issued and construciion
is commenced and diligently pursued to completion. Administrative extensions shall be
allowed for reasonable and unexpected delays as long as code provisions affecting theproposal have not changed.
12-71-8:COMPLIANCE BURDEN:
It shall be the burden of the applicant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence before the
Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board that the proposed
exterior alteration or new development is in compliancewith the purposes of the Lionshead
Mixed Use 2 District, that the proposal is consistent with applicable elements of the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan and that the proposal does not otherwise have a significant
negative affects on the character of the neighborhood, and that the proposal subltantially
complies with other applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan.
12-71-9: LOT AREA AND S|TE DTMENSIONS:
The minimum lot or site area shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of buildable area.
12-71-1O: SETBAGKS:
The minimum building setbacks shall be ten feet (10') unless otherwise specified in the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan as a build{o line.
12-71-11: HEIGHT AND BULK:
Buildings shall have a maximum average building height of 71'with a maximum height of g2.5',
as further defined by the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. All development shall compty
with the design guidelines and standards found in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
Flexibility with the standard, as incorporated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan,
shall be afforded to redevelopment projects which meet the intent of design guidelines, as
reviewed and approved by the Design Review Boaro.
12-71-12: DENSITY (dwelling units per acre):
Ordinance No. 3 , Sori€s of 1999 13
Up to
a 33% increase over the existing number of dwelling units on a property or 35 dwelling units per
acre' whichever is greater shall be allowed. For the purpose of calculating density, erirployee
housing units, accommodation units, timeshare units, and fractional fee club units shall'noi be
counted as dwelling units. Additionally, a lodge dwelling unit, as defined herein, shall be
counted as 25o/o of a dwelling unit for the purpose of calculating density.
Uo to
250 sq. ft. of gross residential floor area shall be allowed for each 100 sq. ft. of buildable site 1
area, or an increase of 33% over the existing GRFA found on the property, whichever isgreater. Multiple-family dwelling units in this zone district shall not be entiUed to additional
Gross Residential Floor Area under the 250 Ordinance, Section 12-15-5, of the Municipal Code.
. 12.71-14'. SITE COVERAGE:
Site coverage shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total site area, unless othenrvisespecified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
12-71-15 LANDSCAPING AND SITE DEVELOpMENT:
At least twenty percent (20%) of the total site area shall be landscaped, unless otherwise
specified in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
12-71-16: PARKING AND LOADING:
off-street parking and loading shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 10 of this Tiile. Atleast one-half (112) lhe required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings.
12-7t-17: LOCATION OF BUSTNESS AcTtVtW:A. Limitations; Exception: All offices, businesses and services permitted by zone district,shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for pbrmitted unenclosedparking or loading areas, the outdoor display of goods, or-outdoor resiaurant seating.
P outdoor Displays: The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly infront of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely uponthe establishment's ownproperty. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructedby outdoor display.
12-71-18: MITtcATtON OF DEVELOPMENT |MpAGTS:
Property owners/developers shall also be responsible for mitigating direct impacts of theirdevelopment on public infrastructure and in ail cases mitigation snil bear a reasonable relationto the development impacts. lmpacts may be determined based on reports prepared byqualified consultants. The extent of mitigation and public amenity improvements shall bebalanced with the goals of redevelopment and will be determinej uv in" planning andEnvironmental Commission in review of development projects and ionditional use permits.Mitigation of impacts may include, but is not limited to, thi following: ."0*"y i111piou"11"ntr,pedestrian walkway improvements, streetscape improvements, strlam facvbankimprovements, public art improvements, and similar improvements. The intent of thissection is to only reguire mitigation for large scate redevelopmenudevelopmant projectswhich produce substantial off-site impacts.
section 3. Tiile 12, chapter 2, section 12-2-2: Definitions, is hereby amended byadding the following definitions:
commercial ski storage: storage for equipment (skis, snowboards, boots and pores)and/or clothing used in skiing-related sports, which is available to the'publlc ormembers, operated by a business, club or government organization, and where a fee ischarged for hourry, dairy, monthry, seasonai or annuar usJge. ski
"torage that is part ofa lodge, or dwelling unit, in which a fee is not charged, is not considered commercial ski
12-71-13: cRoSs RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA (GRFA):
Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 14
storage.
Personal Services: A commercial business where a service is offered lo the customer
including beauty and barber shops, tailor shops, and similar services.
Lodge dwelling unit A small dwelling unit with limited kitchen and floor area and which
contains 650 sq. ft. or less of floor area and is intended to be rented on a short term
basis.
section 4. Title 12, chapter4, section 12-4-1: Designated, is hereby amended to
add the following zone districts:
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District (LMU-1)
Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District (LMU-2)
sectlon 5. Title 12, chapter 10, section j2-10-17: Leasing of parking spaces, is
hereby amended as follows:
(Note: Text which is elrisken is being deleted and text which is underllned is being added.)
Modify B(1) as foilows:B' Lease Qualifications; Application To Lease: A parking space, spaces or areas
may be leased by the owner, occupant or building manager thereof in accordance with
the following:
1. Any owner, occupant or building manager wno owns, occupies or manages
ten (10) or more private parking spaces located in commercial core 1,
commercial core 2, commercial core 3, High Density Multiple-Famiry,
PublicAccommodations. Lionshead Mixed Use {. Lionshead Mixed Use 2
or special development zone districts and provides sufficient parking for use
by employees may apply to the Administrator of the Town for a p"rmit to
lease parking spaces.
section 6. Title 12, chapter 13, section 12-13-6: Type lll Employee Housing Un1
and section 12-13-7: Type lV Employee Housing Unit are hereby amended as follows:
(Note: Text which is strieken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.)
Section 12-13-6: Type lll Employee Housing Unit
Modify B(1 and 3) as follows (modify summary table as necessary):B. General Conditions:
1. lt shall be a conditional use in the Residential cluster, Low Density Multiple-
Family, Medium Density Muttiple-Family, High Density Muttiple-Famiiy, pubtic
Accommodation, commercial core l, commercial core ll, commerciil core lll,
commercial service center, Arterial Business District, parking District, General
Use, and ski Base/Recreation Zone Districts. lt shall be a pirmitted use inLion"h""d Mir"d u"" I
"nd Lion=h"rd Mi*ffi
3' lt shall be counted as five-tenths (0.5) dwelling unit for the purposes of
calculating density, unless located ln the Llonshead Mlxed Use 1 or
The number of Type tlt emptoyee housing units inatGe GGrmineo Oy iEe
Planning and Environmental commission as part of the conditional usi permit
review process set forth in section '12-16-6,"crileria; Findings" of this Tiile.ji!
applicable.
Section 12-13-7 Type lV Employee Housing Unit
Modify B(1 and 3) as follows (modify summary table as necessary):B. General Conditions:
1. lt shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple-
Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Famiiy, public
ordinanc€ No. 3 , Serles of 1999 1 5
Accommodation, Commercial Core l, Commercial Core 2, Commercial Core 3,
Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District, General
Use, and Ski/Base Recreation Zone Districts. lt shall be a permitted use j!
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead MixdIIfITEnJdGtrGGl-
3. lt shall be counted as 0.333 of a dwelling unit for the purposes of calculating
density, unleqs located in the Lionshead Mixed Use 1 or Lionshead Mixed
Use 2 zone 4istricts. where it is not counted as densitv. The number of type
lV employee housing units shall be determined by the planning and
Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permits review Drocess.SetforthinSection12-16-6ofthisTit|e.ifapp|icab|e...'..
section 7. Title 12, chapter 14, section 12-14-19: satellite Dish Antennas, is
hereby amended as follows:
(Note: Text which is stiekec is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.)
Modify D(1)(i) as follows:D. Compliance \Mth Requirements; Variance:
1. Requirements: Satellite dish antennas shall comply with the following
requirements:
i. Due to the special aesthetic importance of the core areas of the
Town, exterior installations of satellite dish antennas in
Commercial Cores 1, anC 2. Lionshead Mixed Use 1. and
Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts shall be permitted only if
screened by some type of enclosing structure. Said structures
required to enclose a satellite dish antenna in these areas shall
comply with all applicable zoning regulations and shall be
architecturally compatible with the existing structure.
section L Title 12, chapter 15, section j2-1s-2: GRFA Requirements by Zone
District and Section 12'15-3: Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions, are hereby amended as
follows:
(Note: Text which is stieken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.)
Section 12-15-2: GRFA Requirements by Zone District
Modify by adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 zone districts totable as follows:
GRFA
Ratio/Percentaoe GRFA Credits
Up to 250% of buildable lot area None
lJp to 25Oo/o of buildabL tot area None
Section 12-15-3: Definition, Calculation, and Exclusions
Modify 2(b) as follows:
Zone Districts
LMU.1
Lionshead Mixed Use 1
LMU-2
Lionshead Mixed Use 2
Multiple-Family structures: within buildings containing more than two (2) allowabledwellings or accommodation units, the following additional areas shall 'be
excluded fromcalculation as GRFA. GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the total square footage ofa building as set forth herein. Excluded areas as set forth shill then be deducted fro-mthe total square footage:
a Enclosed garages to accommodate on-site parking requirements.
b. All or part of the following spaces, provided such spaces are common spaces:
Ordinance No. 3 , Series of .1999
€,IRFA
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Common hallways, stairways, elevator shafts and airlocks.
Common lobby areas.
Common enclosed recreation facilities.
Common heating, cooling or ventilation systems, solar rock
storage areas, or other mechanical systems. Sq{ra€ae€{age
(B): Exempt Areas; Parking Fund
@
Common closet and storage areas, providing access to such
areas is from common hallways only.
Meeting and convention facilities.
Office space, provided such space is used exclusively for the
management and operation of on-site facilities.
Floor area to be used in a Type lll or a Type lV "Employee
Housing Unit (EHU)" as defined and restricted by Chapter 13 of
this Titlq
pereent (600/o) ef the thirty five pereent (35p/c) eemmen area
ORFA, 1{ a ^reperty ewner alleeates eemrnen aree fer the ^urpe€€
ef enpleyee heueing, an*subequenily requeets a eemmen area
€onverted baGk te €srnmen Hse6 and that{he empleyee heu€iFg
units be reFlaeeC within the Tewn,
Section 9, Title 11, Chapter 4, Section 11-4A-1: Signs permitted in Zoning Districts,
is hereby amended by adding Lionshead Mixed Use 1 and Lionshead Mixed ude 2 zJnedistricts to the table in the same category which contains commercial Gore 2.
Section 10. Title 5, Chapter 1, Section 5-1-7: Noise Prohibited, is hereby amended toread as follows:
(Note: Text which is etrisl€n is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.)
Modify c(3xb) as foilows:G. Motor Vehicle Noise:
b. Notwithstanding subsection G3a above, it shall be unlavrrful for any person topermit any idling whatsoever of the engine of any unattended bus, truck or any
motor vehicle. _e_xcept for refrigeration vehicles, within the Lionshead Mixed Lise
1. Llonshead Mixed Use 2. Commercial Core 1 or the Commercial Core 2 Zone
Districts of the Town.
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Section 11. Title 12, Chapter 10, Section 12_10-16
Establishment, is hereby amended as follows:
(Note: Text which is etieken is being deleted and text which is underlined is being added.)
P. Parking Fund: In Commercial Core 1, aRd Commercial Core 2. and Lionsheadyued Use 1. property owners or applicants shall be required to contribute to the Town
Parking Fund, hereby established, for the purpose of meeting the demand and
ef allewed eenmen area shall be inelsded in the ealeulatierF€f
Ordinance No. 3 , Series of 1999 17
requirements for vehicle parking. At such time as any property owner or other applicant
proposes to develop or redevelop a parcel of property within an exempt area which
would require parking and/or loading areas, the owner or applicant shall pay to the Town
the parking fee hereinafter required.
Section 12. lf any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have
passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,
regardless ofthe fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses orphrases be declared invalid.
Section 13. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for ihe health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 14. The amendment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided
in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation
that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other
action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision amended. The
amendment of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
section 15. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shallnot be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore
repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED oNcE tN FULL oN FTRST READING this 16th day of March, 1999, and a public
hearing for second reading of this Ordinance selfor the 6th day of April, 1999, in the CouncilChambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail,
.,'";iffi ",m-('trAr)iffi
t' \ / ,;.iAttest: %\J-=-a)nr;;b#;;*-
onaldson, Town Clerk
READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL this
'.
t:--, i'
-.j,/t t -l'\ l(t r''- f' "Ll.r i -Ludwig Kuz, Mayo-r/pro-Tem
^'---"--"/'
Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1999 18
t wJA,fr
c |lzzlqt
ORDINANCE NO.lO
Series of 1999
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE.ENACTING ORDINANCE NO.17, SERIES OF 1995,
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.7, THE MARRIOTT'S MOUNTAIN RESORT AT
VAIL, AMENDING AND RE.ESTABLISHING THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.9A.10 OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS TO ALLOW FOR
THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR REMODEL OF THE EXISTING HOTEL AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE GORE CHEEK GLUB, AND SETTING FORTH DETAIIS IN
REGARDTHERETO.
WHEREAS, Section 12-9A-10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments to
previously approved development plans for Special Development Districts; and
WHEREAS, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., as owner ol the property, has submitted an
application for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7, Marriott's Mountain
Resort at Vail; and
WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the Special Development District is in the
best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Town
of Vail Comprehensive Plan and Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the
Planning & Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the major amendment
application and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council; and
WHEREAS, this application complies with the underllng zoning of Lionshead Mixed Use
'l District and the SDD as being pursued prior to the adoption of that District; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town ol Vail Municipal Code have been sent to
the appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest of the public health,
safety, and welfare to amend the Development Plan lor Special Development District No. 7,
Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Vail Town Council finds that all the procedures as set forth in Chapter 9A of the
Zoning Regulations have been fully satisfied and that the major amendment to Special
Development District No. 7 complies with the nine criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the
Zoning Regulations. Additionally, the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Vail
Town Council that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development
standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided by the District.
sEcTtoN 2.
Special Development District No. 7 is established to assure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town of
Vail, Colorado; that will provide adequate open space and recreational amenities; that will
enhance the short-term overnight accommodation units of the Town; that will promote the
development objectives of the Town; that will provide deed+estricted housing for 10 employees;
that will improve the streetscape along portions of West Lionshead Circle; and that significantly
enhance the appearance of the existing hotel. The development is regarded as complementary
to the Town by the Vail Town Council and the Planning & Environmental Commission, and,there
are significant aspects of the Special Development District which cannot be satisfied through the
imposition of a standard zoning district.
sEcTroN 3.
Special development District No. 7 is established for development on a certain parcel of
land comprising 5.1 7 acres in the Vail Lionshead area of the Town of Vail, legally described as
Lots 4,7,C & D, Block 1 , Vail Lionshead Third Filing. Said 5.17 acres may be commonly referred
to as "Special Development District No,7." The underlying zoning on the property is Lionshead
Mixed Use 1 Zone District. Upon approval of this ordinance all subsequent development on the
property shall be in accordance with the underlying zoning. All previous approvals are hereby
voided.
SECTION 4. Approval of the Development Plan
The Approved Development Plan for the Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail shall be
incorporated by reference, and made a part of Special Development District No. 7 and
constitutes a general plan for development within the established District. The Plan shall be
regulated, reviewed and amended from time to time in accordance with the provisions outlined in
the Zoning Regulations.
The contents of the Approved Development Plan is comprised of those plans and
documents submitted by Gwathmey, Pratt & schultz Architects and their agents, and shall
include, but not be limited to, the following documents:
1. Proposed Site Plan, Sheet A1.1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
2. Proposed Landscape lmprovements Plan, Sheet L-1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated
April 13, 1999.
3. Building Elevations, Sheet A1 .2, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1 999.
4. Building Elevations, Sheet A1 .3, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1 999.
5. Building Elevations, Sheet A3.1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
6. Building Elevations, Sheet A3.2, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
7. Building Elevations, Sheet A3.3, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
t
levations, Sheet
t
Schultz, dated8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Building E A3.4, Gwathmey, Pratt &April 13, 1999.
Building Elevations, Sheet A3.5, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
Building Elevations, Sheet A3.6, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
Parking LevelZero, Sheet A2.0, Gwathmey, Pratt & SchulE, dated April 13, 1999.
Parking Level One/Unit Level One, Sheet A2.1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April
13, 1999.
Parking LevelTwoiUnit Level Two, Sheet A2.2, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April
13,1999.
Parking LevelThree/Unit LevelThree, Sheet A2.3, Gwathmey, Pratt & SchulE, dated
Aprill3, 1999.
Unit Level Four, Sheet A2.4, Gwathmey, Pran & SchulE, dated April 13, 1999.
Unit Level Five, Sheet A2.5, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, '1999.
Unit Level Six, Sheet A2.6, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
Unit Level Seven, Sheet A2.7, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
Unit Level Eight, Sheet M.8, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
Roof Plan, Sheet A2.9, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated April 13, 1999.
Schematic Off-site lmprovements Plan, dated April 13, 1999.
Gore Creek Streambank lmprovement Plan, dated April 13, 1999.
Roof-top Mechanical Plan, dated April 13, 1999.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
2',t.
22.
23.
SECTION 5.
In addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning & Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council.
These development standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the
integrity of the development of Special Development District No.7 and the sunounding environs.
The following are the development standards for Special Development District No.7:
A. Lot Area - The lot area consists of approximately 225,205 sq.ft./S.1 7 acres.
B. Setbacks - The setbacks for the Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail and the Gore
Creek Club shall be as indicated on the Approved Development Plan.
C. Landscaping - All landscaping shall be as indicated on the Approved Development
Plan.
D. Building Height - The height of the buildings shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plan and shall comply with the underlying zoning.
E. Parking and Loading -The Town of Vail Zoning Regulations prescribe the parking
and loading requirements for development. A minimum of 355 parking spaces
shall be provided. Two-hundred, ninety-four (294) shall be provided for the
t
Resort at Vail and sixty-one (61) shall be provided for the
t
Marriott's Mountain
Gore Creek Club, and in accordance with the Approved Development Plan. The
required number of loading berths shall be five and in accordance with the
Approved Development Plan.
F. Uses - Shall be those permitted conditional and accessory uses identified in the
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District.
SECTION 6.
The Developer, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., as owner of the property and applicant
of for this request, agrees with the following conditions which are made part of the Town's
approval:
(Text in ifarica indicales revisions made by the PEC the conditaons of approval recommended by
stall)
1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application
for the hotel:
a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan;b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;c. A Stormwater Management Plan; andd. A Traffic Control Plan.
2. That the applicant provide six Type lll Employee Housing Units with no less than
10 pillows, with a 24 -hour desk or manager ehu on-site, which complies with the
Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13), for a minimum of
10 employees, and that said deed-restricted housing be made available for
occupancy, and the deed restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk &
Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Gore
Creek Club.
3. That the applicant redesign the proposed loading/delivery plan to insure that
service and delivery vehicles do not block or impede pedestrian and vehicle
traffic.
4. That the applicant redesign the proposed plans for the Gore Creek Club to provide
a minimum of one off-street loadingidelivery berth in the alley with the easement
deed-restricted and recorded on the platso the Gore Creek Club can operate as a
f ree-standing f acility.
5. That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineered drawings of all the
off-site improvements, including improvements to West Lionshead Circle, the
sidewalk from the common property line with Antler's to the South Frontage
Road, for the required on-site and off-site storm water drainage and
management system, for the pedestrian connection to the streamwalk, for
review and approval, prior to application for a building permit.
6. That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an
approval bner from the owner of Lot A to the west of the Gore Creek Club
development site granting permission to regrade portions of Lot A as dePicted on
the proposed plans.
7. That the applicant revise the plans to eliminate any off-site encroachments of the
building on the Town ol Vail right-of-way, prior to a linal review before the Design
Beview Board.
8. That the applicant meet with the Town Staff to prepare a letter of agreement
outlining the requirements of the off-site improvements, prior to first reading of an
ordinance approving the major amendment.
L That the new sidewalk along the south side of West Lionshead Circle be
snowmelted only contiguous to the applicant's propefty.
That the applicant amend the proposed landscape plan and provide increased
amount of landscaping, using AIPP opportunities to integrate functional art pieces,
at the front entrance to the Gore Creek Club and the retail shops aN that it be
approved by the DRB.
That the applicant submit a proposed streambank improvement plan to the
Gommunity Development Department for review and approval prior to application
for a building permit.
That the applicant submit complete set of plans to the Town of Vail Colorado
Department of Transportation for review and that before a final reading with the
Town Council, the applicant enter into a Frontage Boad agreement with the Town
of Vailand approval of a left turn lane ofi of the South Frontage Road onto West
Lionshead Circle. The plans shall by approved by CDOT prior to application for a
building permit.
SECTION 7
Amendments to the Approved Development Plan which do not change its substance may be
approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regularly scheduled public hearing
in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Regulations. Amendments which change the
substance of the Approved Development Plan shall be required to be approved by fie Tontn Council.
The Community Development Department shall determine what constitutes a change in the
substance of the Approved Development Plan, in accordance with the Municipal Code of the Town
of Vail.
SECTION 8
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the etfective date of this ordinance, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. lf the developer does not begin and diligently work towards the completion of the Special
Development District, or at any stage of the Special Development District. This Special Developrnent
District shall become void and all development shall be regulated by the underlying zone district of
LMU1.
sEcroN I
lf any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and
the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 1O
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that ihis ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
10.
11.
12.
SECTION 11.
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE lN FULL ON FIRST READING this 20" day of April, 1999, and a public hearing
for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 4' day of May 1999, in he Courrcil Chamberc of the
Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Robert E. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk
ORIGINAL
ORDINANCE NO.10
Series of 1999
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND FE.ENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 17, SERIES OF 1995,
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.7, THE MARRIOTT'S MOUNTAIN RESORT AT
VAIL, AMENDING AND RE.ESTABLISHING THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12-9A.10 OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS TO ALLOW FOR
THE TNTERIOB AND EXTERIOR REMODEL OF THE EXISTING HOTEL AND THE
CONSTRUCNON OF THE GORE CREEK CLUB, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN
REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Section 12-9A-10 of the Zoning Regulations permits major amendments lo
previously approved development plans for Special Development Districts; and
WHEREAS, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., as owner of the property, has submitted an
application for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7, Marriott's Mountain
Besort at Vail: and
WHEREAS, the proposed major amendment to the Special Development District is in the
best interest of the town as it meets the Town's development objectives as identified in the Town
of Vail Comprehensive Plan and Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Zoning Regulations, the
Planning & Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the major amendment
application and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the Vail Town Council; and
WHEREAS, this application complies with the underlying zoning of Lionshead Mixed Use
'l District and the Special Development District as being pursued prior to the adoption of that
District; and
WHEREAS, all notices as required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code have been sent to
the appropriate parties; and
WHEREAS, the Vail Town Council considers it in the best interest ol the public health,
safety, and welfare to amend the Development Plan for Special Development District No. 7,
Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
SECTION 1
The Vail Town Council finds that all the procedures as set forth in Chapter 9A of the
Zoning Regulations have been fully satisfied and that the major amendment to Special
Development District No. 7 complies with the nine criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-8 of the
Zoning Regulations. Additionally, the applicant has demonstrated to lhe satisfaction of the Vail
Town Council that any adverse effects of the requested deviations from the development
standards of the underlying zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided by the District.
sEcroN 2.
Special Development District No. 7 is established to assure comprehensive development
and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town of
Vail, Colorado; that will provide adequate open space and recreational amenities; that will
enhance the short-term overnight accommodation units of the Town; that will promote the
development objectives of the Town; that will provide deed-restricted housing for 10 employees;
that will improve the streetscape along portions of West Lionshead Circle; and that significantly
enhance the appearance of the existing hotel. The development is regarded as complementary
to the Town by the Vail Town Council, the Planning & Environmental Commission and the Design
Review Board, and lhere are significant aspects of the Special Development District which
cannol be satisfied through the imposition of a standard zoning district.
SECTION 3.
Special Development District No. 7 is established for development on a certain parcel of
land comprising approximately 5.17 acres in the Vail Lionshead area of the Town of Vail, legally
described as Lots 4,7,C & D, Block 1 , Vail Lionshead Third Filing. Said 5.17 acres may be
commonly referred to as "Special Development District No,7." The underlying zoning on the
property is Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District. Upon approval of this ordinance all subsequent
development on the property shall be in accordance with the underlying zoning. All previous
approvals are hereby voided.
SECTION 4. Approval of the Development Plan
The Approved Development Plan for the Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail shall be
incorporated by reference, and made a part of Special Development District No. 7 and
constitutes a general plan for development within the established District. The Plan shall be
regulated, reviewed and amended from time to time in accordance with the provisions outlined in
the Zoning Regulations.
The contents of the Approved Development Plan is comprised ol those plans and
documents submitted by Gwathmey, Pratt & Schul? Architects and their agents, and shall
include, but not be limited to, the following documents:
1 . Proposed Site Plan, Sheet A1 .1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
2. Proposed Landscape lmprovements Plan, Sheet L-1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated
July 6, 1999.
3. Building Elevations, Sheet A1.2, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
4. Building Elevations, Sheet A1 .3, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
5. Building Elevations, Sheet A3.1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
6. Building Elevations, Sheet A3.2, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
i
ations, Sheet
13.
14.
8.
o
10.
11.
12.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Building Elev A3.3, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Building Elevations, Sheet A3.4, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Building Elevations, Sheet A3.5, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Building Elevations, Sheet A3.6, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Parking Level Zero, Sheet A2.0, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Parking Level One/Unit Level One, Sheet A2.1, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6,
1999.
Parking Level Two/Unit Level Two, Sheet A2.2, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6,
1999.
Parking Level Three/Unit Level Three, Sheet A2.3, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July
6,1999.
Unit Level Four, Sheet A2.4, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Unit Level Five, Sheet A2.5, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
unit Level six, sheet A2.6, Gwathmey, Pratt & schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Unit Level Seven, Sheet A2.7, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Unit Level Eight, sheet A2.8, Gwathmey, Pratt & schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Roof Plan, Sheet A2.9, Gwathmey, Pratt & Schultz, dated July 6, 1999.
Schematic Otf-site lmprovements Plan, dated July 6, 1999.
Gore Creek Streambank lmprovement Plan, dated July 6, 1999.
Roof-top Mechanical Plan, dated July 6, 1999.
sEcloN s.
ln addition to the Approved Development Plan described in Section 4 above, the following
development standards have been submitted to the Planning & Environmental Commission for
its consideration and recommendation and are hereby approved by the Vail Town Council.
These development standards are incorporated in the Approved Development Plan to protect the
integrity of the development of Special Development District No.7 and the surrounding environs.
The following are the development standards for Special Development District No.7:
A. Lot Area - The lot area consists of approximately 225,205 sq.ft./S.17 acres.
B. Setbacks - The setbacks for the Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail and the Gore
Creek Club shall be as indicated on the Approved Development Plan.
C. Landscaping - All landscaping and landscape areas shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plan.
D. Building Height - The height of the buildings shall be as indicated on the
Approved Development Plan and shall comply with the underlying zoning.
E. Parking and Loading - The Town of Vail Zoning Regulations prescribe the parking
and loading requirements for development. A minimum of 355 parking spaces
to
shall be provided. Two-hundred, ninety-four (294) shall be provided for the
Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail and sixty-one (61) shall be provided for the
Gore Creek Club, and in accordance with the Approved Development Plan. The
required number of loading berths shall be five and in accordance with the
Approved Development Plan.
F. Uses - Shall be those permitted, conditional and accessory uses identified in the
Lionshead Mixed Use 1 Zone District.
SECTION 6.
The Developer, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., as owner of the property and applicant
of this request, agrees with the lollowing conditions which are made part of the Town's approval:
1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application
for the hotel:
a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan;
b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;
c. A Stormwater Management Plan; and
d. A Traffic Control Plan.
2. That the applicant provide six Type lll Employee Housing Units (EHU) with no less
than 10 pillows, which complies with the Town of Vail Employee Housing
requirements (Chapter 12-13), for a minimum of 10 employees, and that said
deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy, and the deed
restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, prior to requesting a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Gore Creek Club.
3. That the applicant and/or its successors execute a master lease agreement with
an owner of property in the Vail Valley to provide employee housing lor a
minimum of 8 employees, as defined by the Vail Town Code. The duration of the
master lease requiremenl shall be for a period of time not less than 8 years.
Multiple master lease agreements are acceptable. The master lease agreement
requirement for employee housing shall expire 8 years following the date of the
issuance of a building permit. The applicant shall be required to submit a signed
affidavit to the Town of Vail Community Development Department on the 1"t of
February of each year for the term of the agreement confirming compliance
herewith. The affidavit shall provide written notice to the Town of Vail of the
location of the master leased employee housing units and the terms of the lease
agreement. The master lease agreement shall be executed and a copy shall be
provided to the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit.
4. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to the Town of Vail with the Town
of Vail as the beneficiary in the amount of $200,000 to linancially secure the
applicant's proportionate cost for improvements to the east and west intersections
ol the South Frontage Road and West Lionshead Circle. The bond shall be
established prior to the issuance of a building permit and the duration of the bond
shall be for a period of 8 years from the date of building permit issuance. Should
I
the intersection improvements not be commenced within the 8 year period the
Town of Vail shall release the applicant and/or its successors of the financial
obligation of the performance bond.
That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineered drawings of all the
off-site improvements, including improvements to West Lionshead Circle, the
sidewalk from the common property line with Antler's to the South Frontage Road,
for the required on-site and off-site slorm water drainage and management
system, for the pedestrian connection to the streamwalk, for review and approval,
prior to application for a building permit.
That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an
approval letter lrom the owner of Lot A to the west of the Gore Creek Club
development site granting permission to regrade portions of Lot A as depicted on
the proposed plans.
That the applicant conslruct a new sidewalk along the south side of West
Lionshead Circle and that the sidewalk be snowmelted only contiguous t0 the
applicant's property.
That the applicant amend the proposed landscape plan and provide increased
amount of landscaping, using AIPP opportunities to integrate lunctional art pieces,
at the front entrance to the Gore Creek Club and the retail shops and that it be
approved by the DRB.
That the applicant submit a proposed streambank improvement plan to the
Community Development Department for review and approval prior to application
for a building permit.
SECTION 7
Amendments to the Approved Development Plan which do not change its substance may be
approved by the Planning and Environmental Gommission at a regularly scheduled public hearing
in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Regulations. Amendments which change the
substance of the Approved Development Plan shall be required to be approved by the Town
Council. The Community Development Department shall determine what constitutes a change
in the substance of the Approved Development Plan, in accordance with the Town Code of the
Town of Vail.
sEcTtoN I
The developer must begin construction of the Special Development District within three (3)
years from the effective date of this ordinance, and continue diligently toward completion of the
project. lf the developer does not begin and diligently work towards the completion of the Special
Development District, or at any stage of the development of the Special Development District, this
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Special Development District shall become void and all development shall be regulated by the
provisions of the underlying zone district of LMU1,
sEcTtoN I
lf any part, section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid, such decision shall not atfect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and
the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 1O
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary
and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
SECTION 11,
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are
repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise
any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED, AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE lN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6'" day of July, 1999, and a public hearing
for second reading of this Ordinance set for the 20'n day of July 1999, in the Council Chambers of
the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Robert E. Ford , Mayor
Attest:
Lorelei Donaldson. Town Clerk
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452 Memorandum
To: Vail Town Council
From: Town of Vail Design Review Board
Date: June 8, 1999
Re: Board Recommendation of the Proposed Redevelopment of the Marriott and the Gore Creek Club
The Town of Vail Desip Review Board has completed its preliminary review of the proposed redevelopment of the
Marriott and the construction of the Gore Creek Club. Upon the completion of their preliminary review, the Board
has requested that their recornmendations on the proposal be forwarded to the Vail Town Council. The Town
Council will now have the opportunity to evaluate the proposal and the Board's recommendation, and provide
direction to the applicant and the Board on the final revierv process.
On Wednesday, May l9'h, the Town of Vail Design Review Board aEeed to reconrmend approval of the Marriott
redevelopment and Gore Creek Club construction to the Vail Town Council with thc following recommendations:
l. That the roof mass and roof forms (i.e ., landn-rark feature, rake ends, building cantilevers, ctc.) of the existing
hotel and the Gore Creek Club be revised to allow more light and air to reach the pedestrian areas around the
buildings and to comply with the architectural design guidelines of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
2. That a portion of the upper floor of the Gore Creek Club building mass along West Lionshead Circle be
relocated on the site to open a corridor betu,een the existing hotel and the Gore Creek Club.
i. That the exterior rvall of the Gorc CLeck CIub along thc wcst pf(4rcl ty linc rs too stlaight and nccds to bc
articulated rrrore than is shown on tbe proposr:d plans.
4. That the applicant provide perspective drarvings or photo-irragcry oftlrc proposed developnrcnt to aid in the
review and analysis ofthe project.
fi15. That the applicant revise the proposed east and south elevations of the Phase I building to improve thet-' appearance and articulation of that particular portion of the hotel as they are readily noticeable from the
pedestrian areas of Lionshead.
6. That improved site circulation be provided throughout the development area with the goal of creating pedestrian
points of anival, public access to the Gore Creek conidor and pedestrian chculation within the development.
The Board's recommendation to the Town Council is intended to focus on the "bigger picture" iszues. The Board
has not considered nor reviewed architectural details such as exterior colors, door and window trim, balcony rails,
soffit and fascia applications, roofing materials, exterior siding application, etc. The review ofthese items will be
forthcomins.
{P *'no"o'u'*
o
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
974479-2t38
F4X970479-2452
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FA,Y TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
COMPANY NAME:
FAX TTLEPHOIIE NUMBER:
FROM:
DATE:
# OF'PAGES IN DOCUMENT (NOT INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RESPONSEREQTJTRED? -4.4''
SENT BY
TOWN OF'VAIL COMMUMTY DEVELOPMf,NT F'AX # g1OA79A52
TOWN OF VArL COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE #--9zo+ze-21$--
SPECIAL COMMENTS AND NOTES:
F:EVBRYOM\FORMS\FaxShe€t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
970-479-2138
F tx 970-479-2452
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
CONIPAITY NANIE:
FAX TELEPHONE NUMBER:
FROM:
DATE:TIME:
# oF PAGES rN DOCUMENT (NOT INCLTIDING COVER SHEET)
RESPONSE RXQUIR-ED?
SENTBY
TOWN OF VAIL COMMIINITY DEVf,LOPMENT FAX # NO.q79-U52
TOWN OF VAIL COMMUNT.IY DEVELOPMENT TELEPEONE #_ 9?0-479.2138
SPECIAL COMMENTS AND NOTES:
F:EVERYONE\FOtuVS\FaSheet
I \ir
\ \a
\\:i ----
is --
5
.l
)
(:!;T
d
\r
T
,ts
:z
-.-.-.1
t{ ii
l\t.)
)..
':-\ ;:
\ i;i-. \-:E\:, --+ .4
r--*lI 1
r
I
----{---r ,n-\,i-\ 'w)
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
VAIL,
'OLARADO
iiriilHa$"rl.ef'lffill"-Elt-lfi$ilryl
$urliliii l$$Ifl
oavdoloc ltv^tao€fd Ntv-LNnol4 ltol>tvt4 -ltv^
G
il
dI
HIol '
ol
Hl'
dN,
0_tl
i';liiiit b
oav>o-102'1tv\
l>og=H NIV-LNnOH rt_otx:Jvi 1vn
t,trttrl
zllotrtl
$tl5il!J llatlF _tl
3;llI Pall:
69il
X IIIi
tu (Lll rl
zo
F
lu
lu
IF
o_
al;!!t y.l o
o<trt!-(L
:!
<l{.'( f;
oo
; . !3; ! tl8 3 Sr1
I#F @MTH
$i; liiiii @M[ruoavdoljt ltvA
vll 'lr 'l :gvHd - r111a2v) -13IOH 9Ntrglxa
r>o€=21 Ntvl-NnoJ^ rrot>Evhl -]tv^
ilrilltir ittltirir
rlllll
ll
tl
-tl;llotl
<tlTllLll
tlrZllo
?l
>ti
u-lll
J
vll
6il
ruii?tl
ull'zll
oll.x ?
lUll;1
=ll
lutlotl<tlIIILll
'llztl
OI
Fl<l>jlulJ
PI
inl
lul<l
AItur!o;|ll-c|il '
fili
ztl
otl
Fll{tl>
ultlltlr!ll
Ftlutl
otl
=li
\Dliezt
bitix iulll$
ir
zli
oliFlJtl
>lttu
__r|l
rLt llfFtl
MII
otlzll
Dll
Hll'oil:
hti:u|itll ir
t9
t8:
- l\.
"' l.-- ..'" .
I tttttl
$i; liiiii
oaYdolo2 1vA
v|I'tr 't =gvHd - l_:ll-]3?v:l -1t10H tNl-rqtx3
rEo€=x NtvrNnol4 ]-Lot>EVt -]lvn
lflitt{.
lllrlffil
II
-tl;tloil<TLII
rllztl
oll
Fll{tl
>tl
rutlJ
urll
Fotl<!rll
Ollilzll .
6li
xti?u r)1
'-ll
ol
Fli<|>iluJI
url
Ell:)tlOll ;r:oll
AIItut'olll --o ;L .,
olt",M iLllil
t I I I I !l' t ; i , I I rl i t
Itifllil
!i,
1t
'i:
fuliiltt
oavdo102'1tYA
lll 3€VHd - Afi12 >aAd2 A8QA
1do9+J NtV-LNnOld l_rol>>JVN -ltv^@MI]H
@
tl
ll
il
tl
=ll'<ilJllotrll;
lLfl -
$lli
t
i
i"
o
>9-vrt) (Y,<d:
o
lfuldl,",,=. ,. ;r-r,x ;zr#;r#; I te!x$$dl6l tj E
I :li t rli 1; rli li T+-i++
oo
k$*J|:$-ll-JlU
oo
WffiilE
ri
3ria:lt:t;
ir
t\
s
a
tz)\\,
llr, fiul
iiiiqtN
lilir*$H[,
E[h
t
:!'t
11l
[iL if
i
1i
i
tr
)(
t
:!!
n
oavdolo2 atv^
l>o9=:l NtvlNno^ Ilotddvl^ -11v4
!
P
f "i.
;
i"". :t
1#, tI\ !l'--'I'--
t
E!
!i
\
-
o1vdolc)'1lv\
rEoE=d NtvrNno^ ffot2ldvl 'llv^@Mn|j_d
@
i1
."i,iH----t +1
i#;ii'l;'"1!
,/ \',
/ \i
oo
M @MNH
oavdol))'1tv^
tuog=> NtvfNnohl rt-ot>:Jvhl -llVA WMNH
Frr{il
&Jtlur llrtl
8_tl
a rul- !
$*lll
i F$lh
WMNM]
I r tlrtrla
Irlr
ll
-tl;tlotl{tlrtlLll
ttLztl
otl
Fll
<il
>11
'!llilll
inlllu
<ll
olli)zll;
FII .0llrx 1lUllii
i lr lttlrrr
ztl
otlFl<tl>il
5tl
vtl
Ftl
6tlzll
ollvzll.
hllrx tlllllS
li
ll
6tl
Fll
$illull
tttll
rlilotizll
AII| , Hllr' oil;
hll,:d ilLllI
il
ta,
il r.''
1t,
i-t-+.
I lllllll
oavdo'toz :,lv^
vll ' 'l agvHJ - -t:rTf2v! --l=10H 9Nlrglxl
-Ldog=> Ntv.LNnol^ Ilolxdvd -llv^
ir
@MUril
lt
-tl;tloll
<tlTtlLll
)tl
9tl
iil
illJtl!rll
Ftlotl
<tl
nrll
olt91I:F .oil;x ilUllli
;tlotl<tlr
tL ll
rll
oti
tr|l
<tl
>tl
tutlltlu'll
Ftlotl<tl
Itrll
AII
Hllp *
oil;L ,o ;
Hri *
=llotlFt
sil
5lt
rlrll
Eil
8ll F:
atl
sth *
oil;trltroil;u ?tLI ll
rrlitl
oavao1oz :|lv^
vlr '|| 't fgvHJ - -r= -\f"v=l la-toH 9Nl-tglxf
1>O9fd NtVlNnOh rtold>vhl -llvn
lllftl
oavdola)']|lv^
lll 39vHd - en12 >3ad2 =doa1HO93d NtVfNnON lrOt:J:JVhl 'llVA @MNH
@
ll
tl
=ll{tl
dlll
$lli
[,""-, *x;x ;ui:##i; l |j@l li!t
t:lr I 1tI1
| -.=:(ot<
ztl
atlFtl<tl
;llltl
urll
Fllotlnl<
o o
oavdo102'1lv\
lf l =€VHJ - eltlt >=ad2 =dOAIXOE=d NIVINflON uol>>Vl^l -llVA
it
Il
,11
1t
tlHl
stl
5ll
Hll
oo
ltr}trrI tli :[ li lirlf+r
ffiffiil
,,'?).\st
Ir, $,1
iii',firil
3;
,lrr#' \'I
\- l_l l.- - \,/-\_-ri) O
" I, ii
[ .:l-3','; l
\ i \\!\ \ '.
lni \ ,
:9 \-i \ :
E!
!i
aaYda12z'ltv\
-L:JOg=> NtVrNnOh rrot>dvhl -ltvA
t
er
i;
oavdo102'1lv\
-LEOg=H Nt VlNnOkl r-rOt?J:JVl^ -11 vA
Yl,){".';\ .
\" rti.
.Ur Iiiir .*'; I i-'.lr'
a:.
WMt][I
\\
@
fil
$|;
T.I
ir\
oo
oavdol))'1lv\
-L?JO6=A NtVfNnOhl rr-otxdvl^ -llvA @MNH
tlllllr
zorlFtl<tl>tl5tl!il
Ftl
o-tlo=ll
a r
H:ll
9ilitlF rDtl
H$tl
IL LII
o o
oavdola)'1tv^
r>Jo€fx NrvrNnop.l |totddvN -ltv^@MTH
irru.r ll:i
E_ilz =lla ,ll
I! -ll6
$nlll
= 6Pil:I rilili
ztlotltrtlstl|llJtinr llII
8=llz,ll.
p;llr
; 9$l|l
I !r 0" lli
aavdolot llYA
vll 'li 't 39vHd - ljl-]=rv=l -laloH 9Nlfglxf
rHog=d NtvtNnohl .Llotxdvl,.l -llvn @M[|Ei_l
I t llrltrlil ilriirr;
tl
-tl;tlo
<tl-r tl
Lll
ztl
otlFl<tl
>ll
5t
l'lLFtloltlutl
<ll
\D ll ,)zll;
FII .oll;x llullil
-tl
lu tlotl{tlIIILll
ttl
6tl
F
*tllutllll
!r llFtloll
tutl<ll
AII
tills
ot ;
bllrtLIt
zll
otl
Fll{tl>tllull
_Jl
urllrFIIu
oilzl
AILluootlt!oiluLll
Itt,
!(il i::!t i'
.i t\-
"ti
l
I
lllrlrt ll tl
oaYdo102'1lv\
vil 'lr 't 39vHd - r=ll'132vJ l3loH 9NlJglXf
-LdoglH Ntv-LNnol^ l-Lola>vl^ -llv^@MTH
tl
-tl;ilotl
{tlLll
ttlztl
ollFl
stlultlJll!rll
Fotl.{il
nrll
oll9Zil.
6ll!
illi
ztloil
Fll{il>tl
tutlJtlull
Eil5tloil. ,'|ll
otlztl
Ftlotl
xil
lu ll
!lit
!t
ts
; '-$i
ttllI tl fllrtl
rll =evHd "?iHg lr1;
JEoS=ts NlVJNnol,.l IIolzJHVhl llVA @MTE
V,,i:
6
tl
tl
tl
=ll<tl
o-'lll
elli
!rr-'j
i-iri,
f;:a i
sbFV(')ttrf
f@ E-" ;** ;itu1r#; I lt l,&l Ll |jjl
litT$Tt1
oo
oav>o1o) 1lY
lll agvHd - an12 >aad2 adoe
1do9=8 N|V-LNnO',.I IJOIH>V llvn @Mt]H
rl
tl
6ll
Fll
gll
5tl
!.r ll
Ellrlll iOlllOllI
I
zll
otl
Fll
$il
5ll
'ull+ "
Kllizli
l|lrlrl ITIII
oo
oavdolo2 1tv^
lUO€38 NtVlNnOl^ J-lOtd>JV llVA
1.,2\tN7
,"]l
&-l
8;li 9,1
rr filii rl
3 9ll'
R PI!
E il:
llii,
i
=t
@ffiffiE
i
1-l
I
t
:
I
=!
I
t \i
!
)(
rl
:
!\
i+\
t!
odvda102'llv\
IHOS=:J NIV.LNNOh I.IOIEEVhI TIVA @MUtr
@
ilt
$t:
n
)
..:
JFti!
g*?:...ii1 '-'n i)- Yr,,;8
3'" HI
I!
ti
oavdo102 1tv^
-LXOE=> NtVfNnOH llOt>$JVi4 llvn @MNH
zo
tuJlu
F5o_
o,tu
Roylu
bPYTtrtL
ztlotrll
$ilnl Iilllr
ilTll
zsill
6Pil.x r ?
ur lLll*
oo
oavdola2 ltv\
.L}IOE=:J NIVINNOA I-TOId:JVI4 -lIVA @MNH
o,,
F<tl>!t tlJIur llati
ut1o_lz=l
a ri
u-lL
!Q oll
dstli H{ll
I lL 0-ll
,!
t
oavdoloc'1lv\
vll 'll 'l :€vHa - -Lf r-l3"vJ ]3roH 9Nlr9lx3
l->Jogfts NtvrNnohl rlol>>lv^ -'llvA @M[|lfl
a lr trlllrl
t1
-tl;il
tJ)il
$llLll
tIztl
olt
trIt{ll
>tl
5il
urll
Ftl(f)ll
lutl
<ll
olllztl
FII ,(nll;
ilil$
l ltlltrl
I
d
tatl
TI
t!1
'fi...II.
zlloilFl<tl
>tl
tutlltl
rLrll
rllFtl
Mtlotlzll
AII
lullotlotl
tL ll
otl
utlLll
iltl
I
I
.t!
ll
'|.-:.
ll
oavdo102'ltv\v 'lt 't fgvHd - !t-]f2vf -tf10H tNl.tglxf
ldoE=2J NtvfNnoht r-Lot>>JVN -llvn @Mnm
llllftrf
-tl;llotl
$tlLllrI
olt
Fll<tl>il!t IlJ
ui llFIIotl
fill
atl
rullotl
otl
0_ tl
Pll
tl
tl
=ll
tutlotl
silLll
ttlztl
otl
tr|t<tl
>tlgil
xrll
Ftio
<tlnrll
9tl
Hlotl
nl
6tl
rtlotl
trftllrr
zll
9tlFI'<
>iltulltll" urll
EtlftlOll t: '
.'|ll
otllu .- (I)llY +o[;
Ul r
PllrLllll
tt
oavelq2'1tv\
lll 3€vHa - enlc >aa)!2 adoa
lHo9=E N|VINnON !_OtEdVH ltV @MTE
@
tl
tl
=ll<tl
dll:
lL .
$ili
oo
l-96tr0/fltlr{
M l|.u llsll-lliil
t1i r[ 1i T1i il,trttlrf.tt
oo
oavdola2'1tv^
rll !9Vno - Afil) >AA?l2 =>OAldogf> NlvrNnoN rtolx>v^ ']lvn @Mtrru
1}ITTI
atlFII
$tl
lUtlJllmll
rtlFttl
otl(')ll
oo
ffiffi
:'.'.v-\,\t
ilit,firl
I
-i \
i
!I
n
5
ii
grtt
I
/,.
I
i\
:
o4vdo10) ]'lv^
l>o€l:J NtvrNno^ .Ll-ortsEvr -llvA
\l
'-.- li
--.-\
o
)(
oavdo102'ltv\
1>JO9fE NtVrNnOht ItOtS:lVhl -llVA wMutrl
G
n
)
/:!
)>-.:'..'
t
L
fi
*FtrE"
't I
tol a
ll
oav>o102'1tY
iEogfa NtvaNnol^ !-or>>lvl^ -ltvA @MNE
llltl ll
z
tr
5tu-
o-
oltu-
Qovtuqo
H{
0- tL
zlloFtl
$tlul tlJtlull
III
$;ll
Pillr
6Pil,,x r ?
llJ tr[l
oo
oaYdole) 1lv^
-LEO€ld NlVINnoh uOl>JXVI^l -llVA @MTE
1
F
tuJlu
IFdo_
alu-Io
ilH
T IIII ru
I li lill
@Mt]H
r I I rttltrl
zll
otlFl
$tllullJtlurllrFtl
Mtl
otl
ofl9zl:F ..
tnfl'
illl3
-ll6tl
Fll
stl
5il!rll
rt{
Eiloilzll
ail
Hll'oil;L io "g ilLllii
tillI ltll
aaYdo102'1lv\
vtt 'll 'l fgvHd - !l]1a2v J -13rOH 9Nllglx=
l->Jog=:l NtvfNnol^ Ilolxdvl^ -llvn
"
r'
_tl-tl
Hll{tl
fll
ttlztl
otlFl
$ti
!Jl1
dtl
r- llotl
tutl
<tl
all
Hlt,olt;tr ,
9ll"i
Eil$
lilr li
WMNHo4vdo102'llv\
v 'lr 'r 39vHd - rJn3rv.t -]=roH 9Nll€lxf
1do9=d NtvrNnoH llol>JEV -llvn
_ll
;tlo<tlrtlLll
ttlztl
otl
trll<tl
itl
dll
6tl
nll
oilztl
trtlotl
xllutl
ztl
otl
tr|l
9il
tutlJtl
rLrll
fil
oiloll
oztl
Ftotl
3tllutl
zl
otlFl
<t1>ll
5tixrll
EtlftlOll F-oll
atl
Hllr ,-oil;tLlii
9il:lLll$
Irlt!tlI lltllllltt
oavdo102'llv\
l fgvHd - an12 >77}12 adoo
-LHO9=>J NIVfNfiOH ltol:J>Vl^l ..llV @MIE
ltl
$il
I
z9*tt
'')tl5g
f@ k ;ru#i* | |ji$d l:rn'l l_l |jjl
oo
aavdo12z ]|lY
fll f,gvHa - en12 >aada edoa
tHo€=2J NtVaNnOt^ rrotx2jvn -ltv^
It{1i rli
rtrl
@MUru
ilzll
oll
Fll
$iltulllll
urll
Eilltl
otl(')ll
=llotlFl
ftl
dll
Ftlgtl
otlztl
t 'ti 1iir+
oo
le47..1t;i6IE3llffihil
/,#' \jj\ L.l l--r,-
\{)
,L :-
R
I
si
i5
\-a
:
:i
,\ \:fl\
te \ t
$3\!
5l--- ii
\\\
-
oavdo102'1lv^'
.L:JOE=?J NIVINNOhI -LIOId>VA lIVA
G;
lyl
ffiliel
osil
X llr
n" OIN
O FI'I ft]
llr,
ltii!il I
liliir
a
e
#j ;'r'
s
ir
:1
oavdo102'1lv^
J>O9]H N|V-LNnOH !-OlddVH 'llv^
/ffi'ari
3.
t!
.:jr
i!
N
Y-.--+::1,i'
tII
II
oo
@MT]H
@
\r\ \...\i
iJ)
r'\
oavdo102 -ltv^
1do9ftj NlVlNnOl^l Il-Ol*lV -llVA @MTH
6utrtlgtl
5tlill
:) tlo-tl
3;ll!r -ll
$nll
$3tltr tltl
Oo
oavdoloc'1lv\
-Ldog=E NIVTNnOH !-O|>?JVN -'llVn WMNE
z!f
tu
ul
I
x=v-
9-
=|ll!;o= !t{I XII !r 0-
6trtl
$tlllt tlJtlur llrll
dllo-ll
E-llo
Splls
c: fill:i P{llr
I lL tllll
o4vdo10t'1tv\
vl | 39VHa - .llt-]3rvr -l310lt 2Nl19lX3
-L>JO6=}J NIV]NNOA J-IOI>J>JVA TIVN @MNW
lr lrltrir
tl
tl
-tl;llotl
+tltrll
rll
otlFl<ll
>tltlltltlrrll
Ftlolu<ll
o l
711,,
bilix ilulls
ill lttlrrr
li
oavdo102'1tv\
vlt ' 'r 39vHd - rit-lt2v:l -lffoH ?Nllgrx=
r>o€=> NlvtNnoh lJotH:JVt^ -]tvn @MTffi
ll
Hll{tlIILLll
*tl
ollilt
*tl
lutlJtlnll
Ftlo
nll
otlztl
tril
(f') tl
xillllll
6ll
!ilulJtl
urll
4ilotloll
ollzll
htl
xillu
zll
otl
Fll
$illul
:tl
Ftl:) tlotloll
ollul _
8ll:0-llroil;
Hr$
Irrtt!rl
r'
lltl,llrtl
oavaolq2'1tv\
lll 39vHd - en12 >a1d2 1dO9
LHoE=H N|VINnON lJot*lvr,.l llVA @Mnm
@
i
t
fi,-
TIfii-:
t, irtri jl
oo
M lltixtlsll-llul
lrtT$uTI
oo
aavdo102 ltv^
l 36VHd-e12>Zad)adoo
.L}JO9]H NIVINNOA ITOIHdVIA -IIVA @MTH
!t
18 I$IT!T
JI
Fll<
>tl
lutllti
u!llr
&ll
ollzll
tl
zll
otlFt
$illutlJtl
ur llr ?t- :lll roiliol f
oo
li Tli {{| + ++ t
fiiti$iiihM
Ilil,fi$li
=
:
5
d
:
I
E
L;
I
iili
i!
)(
ri
!i
oavdol?)'alv\
1HO9=:J NtVrNnOh rtol>avh -llvA
f-- oavdolo.'1''
I rdog=:J NtvlNflor [or:J>vhr -'1rvA b$$:l|:gll-ll:il
)
Y3:--t-':''
I
llII
ir
t'tt\r.i '.\
l"rn.\]
ii\
llr ,$
oevdo102'1tY
l>oE=> NtvfNnol^ rlotddvl^ -llv^@MIH
rlrlltr I
z
a{
luJul
F5
Dltu-
Ro
p$
ILtr
oo
oavdol)t'1tYA
idO9=E NlV.LNnoN r-Lolt>ivl^l TlVn @MNH
zo"Ftl
stl!t tlJtlull
Ttl
Etlo-z=lo,
ll.l -ila
$n|t:
i Pfllr
oavdo102'alYA
vll 'll 'l SEVHa - rJt]|a2Y) -l3loH 9Nll-glxl
rxo€fd NtvlNnol^ Itot:JEV^ ']lv^
I ll ll
I
@Mt]H
t ltllllirl
tl
-tl;tlotl
$tlLll
rtlztl
otl
Fll<ll>ll
!ullrtl
urll
FIIotl
lutl<ll
olleztl
F["oll;x {lull)i
ztl
otl
Fll<tl
itl
dll
illdtl
oilzll
oll9
=ll.
bil:x {lll )l
otl
Fll.{tl
>tllutlJtl
mll
rtlFtlutlotlzll
atllltll,.oll Y
oil;tL !olt,,illtitLllii
I I lltlll r ltt
oavdo102'ltv\
v 'l| 'r 3gvt-td - J':I-132V1 - 13-LOH tNl-lglx3
1?lo9+J NtvrNnohr rrol>>vt4 llvn @MNH
llllll
ll
-ll
urllotl
$ilLll
Ltl
otl
.F-ll
gil
tuJtl
u.rll
htl{tl
uJll
oll ezll.
Fll!oll.,x llullS
zll
otl
l- ll{tl>tl
ul lldll.
rllEtl
otloll
oll9
= ,. F .oil:XIII!lllx
rllrlrrt
aavdo102 ltv\
lll fgvHJ - en12 >aedz adoa
JEOE=:J NIVINNOH ]jOIXdVA -]IVN @MNH
@
tl
tl
=ll<[
*ll:
tLlt "
$ili
I96i: rtf' (Yrc
M f*,.=" ,. ;mx ;2ffi;#; I |j$$| 16l l-l |jjl
tlt:[ ttrT1
oo
oavdo102 1tYA
lll a6vHd - an12 >a=d2 zdoq
ldoE=d NtvJNnoH !-old:Jvt -]lv^@MTH
1Iiitj[]u$ll
=llol
Fl<
>tlutlJll
'nll
Etl
ry
oilzl
oo
iliLntl
n
eir
oavdola2 llv^
-L)JO€=> NIVTNnOh rrolu>Vld -llv
eatg
i!
--\.-.\
o
oavdola2'1tV^
rlJogfd NlvjNnol4 !-olzi:Jvld -llvn
@
ill
p1,
ll
,"';;t s
__r:".l I,e."-.,{
|r ii:il '.
.1 ii^ii
t,\ '\
'\:".[
'li .1
i.iJ
ii:'
oo
oavdol))'1tv\
-LEOE]H NIV]NNOA I-LOI:JHVhI TIVA @MNE
ll trtll
: zll. oll: ill. >tltu tl-.|tlur ll,rl
F _tl
a=ll_ d ,ltI Pilli
6Pil"
X III?' lll lI ll t
Frr
stlul lldll
III5flo-rr =llo,lltu-tl
* ollv 0Jtl
6Yilu.atr ltl
oo
oavao102 1lv^
JEOgIE NtVrNnOhl l-IOtAzJVr4 -llVA @MNH
zo,,F- ll
$iltuu--t i!rI
T]
1lo-ll
o rtl
lU - lls
$ullr
i F$lli
oavdol)t'1lv\
vll ' 'l fEVHd - 1lt-]]?vl -laroH 9Nl-LglXf
IHO9=d NlVINnol^l ItOl>2JVt^l -llVA
llr ltltr,i
_tl-tlullo{rtlLll
ztl
otlFl<tl>tlr'lll
illl
Ftlotltu
<ll
otl
Hllro :L "oil;trltl0-ll)i
@MTH
:
,ltttrlrit
Titl
,i- f,:9itl ilr:l! i'*\.
i ,>'tt i.-l'-1-." 1,,J "r''.'t,
i lrirlll
.,1-"
III 1r ti
oavdo102 -|tv^
vlt '[ 't fgvHd - lit]f2vJ -lfloH gNt.LElxf
Jdog=d NtvJNnoN uot>>vhl -ltv^@Mnm
=ll
tu tlotl
{tlLll
tllztloil
Etl
>tlutlJtl!rll
Ftl
Htl
atl
tutlotl
otl
tLtloI
utllLl
=tl
tutl
'J)tl+llLll
'll
otl
Fll<tl
>tl
tu tlJllurll
Fllotl
fitl
oll.rzl.
inll {
x itu s
Irltlllllf tt ItfttI tt
oavdo102 ]tv\
lll 36vHd - an12 >aa?!2 adoe
l.dogf> NlvlNnoh -Llotaav|^ -]lv^@MTH
.'
5
)l
oo
t-
2 \.1
F r:/|fifvv<Lr :f
M lltl ll,&ll-llbl
. -'t
:1i. - t:.a'i' "ii iI r:,.1
! -{
i.t
_.{,-.{,
i:
;, t:i
oo
ilt:[t1i1T
o4vao102'1lY
lll 3€vHJ - an12 >a=d) aaoa
r-toEfE NtvJNnoH 1lot:J>vhl -llvA @MT]H
=llotl
!il
5tl
utll
rtt
F- tl
rl llollzll
rl
zlloll
F
stl
5tl['ll
:E tlFtl:)tl
otlrnll
oo
frrTrl
|lil$l$il
e
ilil,firl
tr/#, plH
\ t,-' --1,-.-
!.fl) O
,I i.I f iE
-Ji- iL: .I
r-- at t ilill I
-\\'
t
z
:liiIi!;*EEriiiii
li
:l
i
:
E!..- ti
\
U
o4v>o102'1lVA
ldog3d NlvlNno^ ILolHHVl^ -l1v^
.--tt.--.
oav&1c'2'1tYA
1do9+J N|VINnOH l-totudvh -llVA @Mt]E
@
i6
ia
o o
oavdol22 l|lv^
JAOg*J NtVlNnOl^ rlOlH:JVld -llvA @MNH
zQltrtlstllu IlJtlur llaIFtl
o-tlo=tl
ftrll
$nll
E Otl
H{tl
tL tLrl
oo
oavdo102'-1tYA
1HO932l Nt V-LNnOh r_lOtX)JVl^ Tt Vn @MNH
6,,Fll{tltullJll!r llrtl
&tlo-tlz=ll
a rtll!-tlIoll! ullqo{
i Hfll
ofltrtl$ilul lldll
III
8=llz ,ll.
9:lli
6PII;
ilfilt
i
': ''--i'..i
ij
aavdo102'ltv\
vtl 'l 'l lgvHd - rJtlaav1 -1f10H 9Nl19lX3
-L>O9=E NIVINflOP{ ILOI:i8Vl^l -llVA
li
@MTru
tl
-tl;tlotl
silLll
ttlztl
otl
tr|l
stl
lUtlJll
urll
Ftlotl
tutl
<ll
o lzll;
bll;x .('!lllll
irliII
trltit I l rlrllii
li
@Mt]H
ll+
-tltutlo{ltlLllllrtlztl
otlFl<tl
>tl
ruil
Ell
Fotl{ilmll
atl
Hlh *
oil;tL rot ;ull?lLll$ *
zll
otl
Fll
<tl
>tl
tutlJlltull_ll+Ftl:)tl
otlotl
ollqzll;
6ll'x t
llJrtri
lttltrt
:'rlrltl
=llotlFl- {tl
>tl
tutlJtl
- - ulll
Fllltlall e= ",rll
Dtltu .-- rflll9 *-oil:Flliw["itr tL[S
o4vdo102'1tv\
vll 'll 'l ]gvlld - LJt]l:]2vJ -lf10H 9t'll19lx=
-L:lo9=d NIVINflOl4 -LIolH>VIl.t ll Vn
taIr
ll
ff^,i
Ii
$
o4vdo102'1tv\
lit fgvHJ - en-D >aad) SdoQ
r:Jog=> NtvfNnoh| !_ot:J>JVrd -ltv^@MIE
izaE.f),
trl nzt<r,l t
M @lsll--llbl
oo
oav>o102'1tv\
llr lgvHd - an1) >aad2 ado9
-L>JOE3> NIVfNnOH IlOl>J>lVhl TlVn @MTH
=lloll
Fll<tl
>tl
lUJtl
lull
Etl
fr ll
otlzll
llotlFl
$ll
5il
u.r ll:r It
F- tl:t ll0tl
rnll
oo
i|! : i iti iti ;li't i'i ti 1irt
Department of Comrnunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452 MEMORANDUM
To: Vail Town Corurcil
From: CommunityDwelopmentDcpartnent
Date: June 4, 1999
Mariott Red€velopment hoposal Worksession
Henry Pratt, of Gwathmey, Pratt, SchulE Architects has requested a worksession with the Town Council. The
purpose of the worksession is to:
o present lhe redwelopment proposal to the Council for preliminary rwiew prior to preparing an ordinance,
o visit the proposed development site,
r inform the Town Council of the results of the del,elopment rwiew process with lhe Planning & Environmental
Commission ard the Design Rwiew Board to dale,
I provide the Council with the opportunity to engage in a discussion with the applicant, stalf and public with
regard to lhe proposal, and
o idemf the Council's issues or concems with the redwelopment proposal.
To that en4 gafr has included the following documents in the packet for your rwiew and consideration:
I . A copy of the March 8, 1999 staff memorandum to the Plaruring & Erwironmental Commission and the
Commission's approved meeting minutes. At the March E meeting the Commission voted to recommend
approval of the major SDD amendment wift conditions.
2. A copy of the Design Review Board's recommendation to the Town Council dated June 8, 1999. The
Board's recommendation is the result of four conceptual re!'ierv meetings with the applicant.
3. A copy of a summary of the Lionshead Redwelopment Mastcr Plan and an Architectural Design Guideline
checklist including the Board's comments on thc proposal.
4. Copies of correspondence received from the community with rcgard to the proposed redwelopment.
5. Reduced copies ofthe proposed plans.
In waluating the redwelopment proposal staff has identified a number of pros and cons of the project. The pros and
cons ar€ listed below for consideration:
Pros
L The attainment of the goals of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan tfuough the implementation of
the objectives and recommendations of the Plan (renewaVredwelopment, stronger economic base,
improved infrastnrctwe, vitality/amenities).
{g *"n"uor r""
FILE COPY
75 South Fronage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970479-2452
Department of Community Developmcnt
May26, 1999
Heory Pratt
Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz Architecls, P.C.
1000 Smth Frmtage Rmd West
Vail, Colsado 81657
Re: Marriott off-site impovanents
Dear Henry,
The Lim$ead lv{a*er Plm and enabling adinances discus the need to assess reasoable off-site
impovements to specific developments. The lv{aster Plan has identified over $15 millim in Frotage Rmd
improvements from the main Vail Roundabout to the Cascade Village. This is a distance of approximately
7300 ft. and will cmtinue appnoximately t€o major intersectims.
The Tom bas requested frqn the Colcado Departmart of Transpotatio, $5 millim to povide
imFwem€nts. The ranaining $5 millio is assumod to directly be attibutable to tbe ten intersectims;
equaling $500,000 per intersectio.
Those dwelqments accessing the two intersectims of West Limshead Circle will be cmtributing to the
imFovern€ots of these trvo intersectims, In ader to determine, at this timg the attrihrtable numb€r of
fips to each intersection, the cornbined trips of boih inlersectims were deterrnined.
The Traffic Study fm the Limshead Master Plan shons an increase of vehicle tips at both intersectios of
127 rips in the a.rn fa a total of 640 rips and an increase of 195 tips in the p.rrI. peak ha"u for a tcal of
795trips Thelvlarriott'spqoealaddsl0nenrDU's,4newcmdosand6ElIlJ'sintheexistinghotel.
The timeshar€ prqiects adds 66 new units.
The Sannday peak ftctor is .738 x 66 = 49 = 25% of $ I,000,000 = $250,000.
195
Sinceely,
F'(I Jl-o-ta-
Geoge Ruther, AEP
?,,u-,
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Xc: Greg llall, Acting Director of Public Wmks
€p*,uo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cons
l.
2.
The redevelopment will aa as a catalyst for other redevelopment projects in the Lionshead area.
Improved @estrian circulation through the consfuAion of sidewalk and steetscape inprovements.
The enluncement of the Gore Creek sheam corridor through sfeam bank rcstoration and revegcatior.
The elimination of an unsighfly surhce parking dec*.
The pro,ision of employee housing opporhrnities for up to ten employees in the immediate Lionslread area
The proposal adds new building height and building mass to the property which may have impacts on
adjacent poperties.
Pot€ntial hcr€ases in both vehicuhr (car, bu, delivery truck) and pedestrian tmffic in the immediale ar€as
surrounding the development site.
3. The loading and delivery configuration as proposed may result in periods of delay and/or congeslior.
4. The additional building height increases the "shade and shadod' effects ofthe building on adjacent
properties.
t
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINAL AGENDA
Wednesday, May 19, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCFI - Community Dsvelopment D,epartment
Clark Brittain
BillPierce
Melissa Greenauer
Tom Weber (PEC)
stTEvtstTs
MEMBERS ABSENT
Hans Woldrich
1. Scorpio - 131 West Meadow Drive2. Dobson lce Arena - 321 E. Lionshead Circle3. Vail lnternational- 300 E. Lionshead Circle4. Wand - 381 Beaver Dam Circle5. Hoversten-95 Forest Road6. Waterhouse-285 Forest Road7. Austrian - 696 Forest Road8. Gold Peak Skier Tunnel- 458 Vail Valley Drive9. Lot 13, Forest Glen -439 Glen Falls Lane10. VailMountain School-3160 Katsos Ranch Road
Driver: George
FILE rif/P|
11:30 pm
1dn pm
I'EIIBERS PRESENT
PUBUC HEARING . TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Austrian residence - Conceptual review of a re.ryrodel of a primary/secondary residence.
696 Forest Road / Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village 6"' Filing.
Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. NeilAustrian, represented by Robert L. Arnold
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
2. Hoversten residence - Conceptual review of a new single-family residence.
95 Forest Road / Lot 32, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Philip Hoversten, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE:4-0
CONSENT APPBOVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That a Public Works and Zoning approval be required.
3. Wand B Development, LLC - Conceptual review of a new primaryisecondary residence
with a Type ll employee housing unit.
381 Beaver Dam Circle / Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3'o Filing.
Applicant: Wand B Development LLC, represented by Jay Peterson
3:00 pm
Brent
Dominic
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
4. Golden Peak Ski Base - Skier tunnel. Dominic
458 VailValley Drive / Tract B, Vail Village 7'n Filing.
Applicant: VailAssociatesMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 2, 1999
5. Antler's - Final review of a proposed expansion. George
680 W. lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block'1, Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVineMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TAELED UNTIL JUNE 2, 1999
6. Dobson lce Arena - Final review locker room/loading dock expansion, George
321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2no Filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Odell Architects
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That brick pavers be installed at the entrance to the loading dock.2. That a revised landscape plan be submitted.
7. Vail Intemational Condominiums - Removal of trees. George
300 E. Lionshead Circle / Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing #2.
Applicant: VaillntemationalCondominiumAssociation
MOTION: Tom Weber SECOND:Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0-1 (Bill Pierce abstained)
APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the one tree on Vail International property be removed and no trees on Town of Vail
property be removed.
8. Waterhouse residence - Final review of a new garage. Allison
285 Forest Road/Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1".
Applicant: Steve & Linda Waterhouse, represented by Steven Riden
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE:4-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the rail on the east be wood, rather than stone.
9. Lot 13, Forest Glen - Conceptual review of a new single-family residence. Allison
4439 Glen Falls Lane / Lot 13, Forest Glen Subdivision.
Applicant: Lot 13, LLC represented by S.H. Cole Construction
MOTION:Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That it meet Public Works and planning approval.
' 10. Scorpio - Gate and parking improvements George
tgt West Meadow Drive/Part df Lot 1, Part of Block D, Vail Village 2nd.
Applicant: ScorpioCondominiumAssociationMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 2, 1999
11. Lot 25, Gtacier Ct. - Conceptual review of a new primaryisecondary residence. George
1854 Glacier Ct./Lot 25, Block 2, Lionsridge #3.
Applicant: Pat DauphinaisMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTTLJUNE 2, 1999
12. VailMountain School-Temporarystructure. ^- George
3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Pirt ot Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village t lh fiting.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Pam Hopkins
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
13. The Marriot (Lionshead) -Conceptual review of a major exterior alteration George
and construction of a new interval ownership club.
715 W. Lionshead Circle / Marriott MarK Morcus Subdivision
Applicant: HMC Corporation, represented by East-West Partners and Gwathmey-PrattMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONCEPTUAL - BECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL
Staff Approvals
Christopher-Wollard residence - Driveway snowmelUre-alignment; revised landscaping. Brent
2550 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 34, Block 2, Vail Village 13" Filing.
Applicant: Rocky Christopher
Fredin residence - Finish unfinished basement. Brent
2091 -A Zermatt Lane, Vail Commons #5B/Unplatted, Vail das Schone Filing f3.
Applicant: Peter M. Fredin
Davie residence - Driveway snowmelustamped concrete pavers. Brent
776 Potato Patch/Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: John Davie
La Bottega - Addition of pavers and deck extension. Brent
100 E. M-eadow Drive/Lots M & O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Stephen Virion
Meadow Vail Place Penthouse - 250 addition. Allison
44 W. Meadow Drive/Lot 1, VailVillage 2no.
Applicant: SpraddleCreekProperties
Sonnenalp Hotel & Spa - New canopy (revised) * Brent
20 Vail Road/A portion of Lot K, Block 5E, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Johannes Faessler
One Vail Place - Exterior painting. Brent
244Wall StreeUA portion of Bbck 5A, Vail Village 1"t.
Applicant: Hill, Drescher, Smead & Wells
BrentWall Street Building -Skylight addition.
225Wall StreeuPart of Lots B&C, Block 5C, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Wall Street Building Condo Association
Schofield residence - Stairuay replacement. Brent
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley 1"'.
Applicant: John Schofield
Vail Associates Pump House & Tennis Courts - Replace 5 spruce trees on W. Forest Rd. Dominic
615 W. Forest Rd.iUnplatted, adjacent to Vail Lionshead 3'o Filing.
Applicant: VailAssociates
Vail East Condominiums -Window replacement. Brent
4093 Spruce Waylt/ail East, Bighorn 3'o.
Applicant: Vail East Lodging Association
McDonald's - Two new wall signs. Brent
2112 N. Frontage Road WesVLot 2b, a resub ol Lot 2, Vail das Schone Filing tr2.
Applicant: George Greenwald
Ginzberg - Bedroom addition. Jetf
4034 Bighom Road, #1/Lot 1, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision.
Applicant: Stewart & Lisa Ginzberg
Eagle Bahn Gondola - New deck on south side of gondola. Jetf
Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1"t.
Applicant: VailAssociates
Shaper- New garage. .. Jetf
2645 Bald lrlountaiiRoad/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village 13th.
Applicant: Steve Shaper
Roost Lodge - Move equipment to non-visible location. Dominic
1793 N. Frontage Rd. Wesvlots 10,11 & 12, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Rodney Cofton
Stern - Entry addition. Jefl
1517 Vail Villey Drive,#1tLol12, Block 3, Vail Valley 1s.
Applicant: Don & Ann Stem
Marrion Mountain Resort - New awning. Brent
715 W. Lionshead Circle/Manion Mark, Morcus Subdivision.
Applicant: selim wahba
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular qflc_e
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 Sot
Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephor
for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
May 17, 1999
George Ruther
Town of Vail Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: response to May 13 list of Marriott Lionshead DRB issues
Dear George and members of the DRB:
Here is our response/ explanation to the DRB comments listed in the May 13, 1999 memo
from George Ruther. As you are aware, many of the comments predate the May 5, 1999
DRB meeting and may have already been addressed through changes proposed at that
meeting.
4.3.1.2- North South Orientation of Buildings:
l. Open up a light corridor between the existing hotel and the Gore Crcek Club to get
light back down to the street and sidewalk.:
Changes to the proposed design of the Phase 2a building and the Gore Creek Club were
presented at the May sth DRB hearing. In the May 196 hearing we will present additional
changes wherein all units on the top floor of the north wing of the Club have been relocated
to the south end of the Club. This change will provide a significant reduction in height at the
northeast corner of the Club.
2. The ridge lines of the improvements should be lowered and a greater space left
between the buildings to maintain the view to the mountain from the Vail Spa.:
In the May 50' DRB hearing, we presented significant lowering of building height at Phase 1,
Phase 2a and at the Gore Creek Club north wing. As described above, we will propose on
the 19s additional lowering of the height of the northeast corner of the Club's north wing.
The wording of the Master Plan states that "future development and redevelopment
<should> orient vertical building masses along a north-south axis whenever possible".
Whenever possible. Increasing the separation between the existing Hotel Phase 2a and the
Gore Creek Club is not possible due to the constraints imposed by the existing parking
structure. We have located the majority of our density in a north-south manner along
[,""-, *x;x ;ui:##i; l |j@l li!t
t:lr I 1tI1
| -.=:(ot<
ztl
atlFtl<tl
;llltl
urll
Fllotlnl<
o o
oavdo102'1lv\
lf l =€VHJ - eltlt >=ad2 =dOAIXOE=d NIVINflON uol>>Vl^l -llVA
it
Il
,11
1t
tlHl
stl
5ll
Hll
oo
ltr}trrI tli :[ li lirlf+r
ffiffiil
,,'?).\st
Ir, $,1
iii',firil
3;
,lrr#' \'I
\- l_l l.- - \,/-\_-ri) O
" I, ii
[ .:l-3','; l
\ i \\!\ \ '.
lni \ ,
:9 \-i \ :
E!
!i
aaYda12z'ltv\
-L:JOg=> NtVrNnOh rrot>dvhl -ltvA
t
er
i;
oavdo102'1lv\
-LEOg=H Nt VlNnOkl r-rOt?J:JVl^ -11 vA
Yl,){".';\ .
\" rti.
.Ur Iiiir .*'; I i-'.lr'
a:.
WMt][I
\\
@
fil
$|;
T.I
ir\
oo
oavdol))'1lv\
-L?JO6=A NtVfNnOhl rr-otxdvl^ -llvA @MNH
tlllllr
zorlFtl<tl>tl5tl!il
Ftl
o-tlo=ll
a r
H:ll
9ilitlF rDtl
H$tl
IL LII
o o
oavdola)'1tv^
r>Jo€fx NrvrNnop.l |totddvN -ltv^@MTH
irru.r ll:i
E_ilz =lla ,ll
I! -ll6
$nlll
= 6Pil:I rilili
ztlotltrtlstl|llJtinr llII
8=llz,ll.
p;llr
; 9$l|l
I !r 0" lli
aavdolot llYA
vll 'li 't 39vHd - ljl-]=rv=l -laloH 9Nlfglxf
rHog=d NtvtNnohl .Llotxdvl,.l -llvn @M[|Ei_l
I t llrltrlil ilriirr;
tl
-tl;tlo
<tl-r tl
Lll
ztl
otlFl<tl
>ll
5t
l'lLFtloltlutl
<ll
\D ll ,)zll;
FII .oll;x llullil
-tl
lu tlotl{tlIIILll
ttl
6tl
F
*tllutllll
!r llFtloll
tutl<ll
AII
tills
ot ;
bllrtLIt
zll
otl
Fll{tl>tllull
_Jl
urllrFIIu
oilzl
AILluootlt!oiluLll
Itt,
!(il i::!t i'
.i t\-
"ti
l
I
lllrlrt ll tl
oaYdo102'1lv\
vil 'lr 't 39vHd - r=ll'132vJ l3loH 9NlJglXf
-LdoglH Ntv-LNnol^ l-Lola>vl^ -llv^@MTH
tl
-tl;ilotl
{tlLll
ttlztl
ollFl
stlultlJll!rll
Fotl.{il
nrll
oll9Zil.
6ll!
illi
ztloil
Fll{il>tl
tutlJtlull
Eil5tloil. ,'|ll
otlztl
Ftlotl
xil
lu ll
!lit
!t
ts
; '-$i
ttllI tl fllrtl
rll =evHd "?iHg lr1;
JEoS=ts NlVJNnol,.l IIolzJHVhl llVA @MTE
V,,i:
6
tl
tl
tl
=ll<tl
o-'lll
elli
!rr-'j
i-iri,
f;:a i
sbFV(')ttrf
f@ E-" ;** ;itu1r#; I lt l,&l Ll |jjl
litT$Tt1
oo
oav>o1o) 1lY
lll agvHd - an12 >aad2 adoe
1do9=8 N|V-LNnO',.I IJOIH>V llvn @Mt]H
rl
tl
6ll
Fll
gll
5tl
!.r ll
Ellrlll iOlllOllI
I
zll
otl
Fll
$il
5ll
'ull+ "
Kllizli
l|lrlrl ITIII
oo
oavdolo2 1tv^
lUO€38 NtVlNnOl^ J-lOtd>JV llVA
1.,2\tN7
,"]l
&-l
8;li 9,1
rr filii rl
3 9ll'
R PI!
E il:
llii,
i
=t
@ffiffiE
i
1-l
I
t
:
I
=!
I
t \i
!
)(
rl
:
!\
i+\
t!
odvda102'llv\
IHOS=:J NIV.LNNOh I.IOIEEVhI TIVA @MUtr
@
ilt
$t:
n
)
..:
JFti!
g*?:...ii1 '-'n i)- Yr,,;8
3'" HI
I!
ti
oavdo102 1tv^
-LXOE=> NtVfNnOH llOt>$JVi4 llvn @MNH
zo
tuJlu
F5o_
o,tu
Roylu
bPYTtrtL
ztlotrll
$ilnl Iilllr
ilTll
zsill
6Pil.x r ?
ur lLll*
oo
oavdola2 ltv\
.L}IOE=:J NIVINNOA I-TOId:JVI4 -lIVA @MNH
o,,
F<tl>!t tlJIur llati
ut1o_lz=l
a ri
u-lL
!Q oll
dstli H{ll
I lL 0-ll
,!
t
oavdoloc'1lv\
vll 'll 'l :€vHa - -Lf r-l3"vJ ]3roH 9Nlr9lx3
l->Jogfts NtvrNnohl rlol>>lv^ -'llvA @M[|lfl
a lr trlllrl
t1
-tl;il
tJ)il
$llLll
tIztl
olt
trIt{ll
>tl
5il
urll
Ftl(f)ll
lutl
<ll
olllztl
FII ,(nll;
ilil$
l ltlltrl
I
d
tatl
TI
t!1
'fi...II.
zlloilFl<tl
>tl
tutlltl
rLrll
rllFtl
Mtlotlzll
AII
lullotlotl
tL ll
otl
utlLll
iltl
I
I
.t!
ll
'|.-:.
ll
oavdo102'ltv\v 'lt 't fgvHd - !t-]f2vf -tf10H tNl.tglxf
ldoE=2J NtvfNnoht r-Lot>>JVN -llvn @Mnm
llllftrf
-tl;llotl
$tlLllrI
olt
Fll<tl>il!t IlJ
ui llFIIotl
fill
atl
rullotl
otl
0_ tl
Pll
tl
tl
=ll
tutlotl
silLll
ttlztl
otl
tr|t<tl
>tlgil
xrll
Ftio
<tlnrll
9tl
Hlotl
nl
6tl
rtlotl
trftllrr
zll
9tlFI'<
>iltulltll" urll
EtlftlOll t: '
.'|ll
otllu .- (I)llY +o[;
Ul r
PllrLllll
tt
oavelq2'1tv\
lll 3€vHa - enlc >aa)!2 adoa
lHo9=E N|VINnON !_OtEdVH ltV @MTE
@
tl
tl
=ll<tl
dll:
lL .
$ili
oo
l-96tr0/fltlr{
M l|.u llsll-lliil
t1i r[ 1i T1i il,trttlrf.tt
oo
oavdola2'1tv^
rll !9Vno - Afil) >AA?l2 =>OAldogf> NlvrNnoN rtolx>v^ ']lvn @Mtrru
1}ITTI
atlFII
$tl
lUtlJllmll
rtlFttl
otl(')ll
oo
ffiffi
:'.'.v-\,\t
ilit,firl
I
-i \
i
!I
n
5
ii
grtt
I
/,.
I
i\
:
o4vdo10) ]'lv^
l>o€l:J NtvrNno^ .Ll-ortsEvr -llvA
\l
'-.- li
--.-\
o
)(
oavdo102'ltv\
1>JO9fE NtVrNnOht ItOtS:lVhl -llVA wMutrl
G
n
)
/:!
)>-.:'..'
t
L
fi
*FtrE"
't I
tol a
ll
oav>o102'1tY
iEogfa NtvaNnol^ !-or>>lvl^ -ltvA @MNE
llltl ll
z
tr
5tu-
o-
oltu-
Qovtuqo
H{
0- tL
zlloFtl
$tlul tlJtlull
III
$;ll
Pillr
6Pil,,x r ?
llJ tr[l
oo
oaYdole) 1lv^
-LEO€ld NlVINnoh uOl>JXVI^l -llVA @MTE
1
F
tuJlu
IFdo_
alu-Io
ilH
T IIII ru
I li lill
@Mt]H
r I I rttltrl
zll
otlFl
$tllullJtlurllrFtl
Mtl
otl
ofl9zl:F ..
tnfl'
illl3
-ll6tl
Fll
stl
5il!rll
rt{
Eiloilzll
ail
Hll'oil;L io "g ilLllii
tillI ltll
aaYdo102'1lv\
vtt 'll 'l fgvHd - !l]1a2v J -13rOH 9Nllglx=
l->Jog=:l NtvfNnol^ Ilolxdvl^ -llvn
"
r'
_tl-tl
Hll{tl
fll
ttlztl
otlFl
$ti
!Jl1
dtl
r- llotl
tutl
<tl
all
Hlt,olt;tr ,
9ll"i
Eil$
lilr li
WMNHo4vdo102'llv\
v 'lr 'r 39vHd - rJn3rv.t -]=roH 9Nll€lxf
1do9=d NtvrNnoH llol>JEV -llvn
_ll
;tlo<tlrtlLll
ttlztl
otl
trll<tl
itl
dll
6tl
nll
oilztl
trtlotl
xllutl
ztl
otl
tr|l
9il
tutlJtl
rLrll
fil
oiloll
oztl
Ftotl
3tllutl
zl
otlFl
<t1>ll
5tixrll
EtlftlOll F-oll
atl
Hllr ,-oil;tLlii
9il:lLll$
Irlt!tlI lltllllltt
oavdo102'llv\
l fgvHd - an12 >77}12 adoo
-LHO9=>J NIVfNfiOH ltol:J>Vl^l ..llV @MIE
ltl
$il
I
z9*tt
'')tl5g
f@ k ;ru#i* | |ji$d l:rn'l l_l |jjl
oo
aavdo12z ]|lY
fll f,gvHa - en12 >aada edoa
tHo€=2J NtVaNnOt^ rrotx2jvn -ltv^
It{1i rli
rtrl
@MUru
ilzll
oll
Fll
$iltulllll
urll
Eilltl
otl(')ll
=llotlFl
ftl
dll
Ftlgtl
otlztl
t 'ti 1iir+
oo
le47..1t;i6IE3llffihil
/,#' \jj\ L.l l--r,-
\{)
,L :-
R
I
si
i5
\-a
:
:i
,\ \:fl\
te \ t
$3\!
5l--- ii
\\\
-
oavdo102'1lv^'
.L:JOE=?J NIVINNOhI -LIOId>VA lIVA
G;
lyl
ffiliel
osil
X llr
n" OIN
O FI'I ft]
llr,
ltii!il I
liliir
a
e
#j ;'r'
s
ir
:1
oavdo102'1lv^
J>O9]H N|V-LNnOH !-OlddVH 'llv^
/ffi'ari
3.
t!
.:jr
i!
N
Y-.--+::1,i'
tII
II
oo
@MT]H
@
\r\ \...\i
iJ)
r'\
oavdo102 -ltv^
1do9ftj NlVlNnOl^l Il-Ol*lV -llVA @MTH
6utrtlgtl
5tlill
:) tlo-tl
3;ll!r -ll
$nll
$3tltr tltl
Oo
oavdoloc'1lv\
-Ldog=E NIVTNnOH !-O|>?JVN -'llVn WMNE
z!f
tu
ul
I
x=v-
9-
=|ll!;o= !t{I XII !r 0-
6trtl
$tlllt tlJtlur llrll
dllo-ll
E-llo
Splls
c: fill:i P{llr
I lL tllll
o4vdo10t'1tv\
vl | 39VHa - .llt-]3rvr -l310lt 2Nl19lX3
-L>JO6=}J NIV]NNOA J-IOI>J>JVA TIVN @MNW
lr lrltrir
tl
tl
-tl;llotl
+tltrll
rll
otlFl<ll
>tltlltltlrrll
Ftlolu<ll
o l
711,,
bilix ilulls
ill lttlrrr
li
oavdo102'1tv\
vlt ' 'r 39vHd - rit-lt2v:l -lffoH ?Nllgrx=
r>o€=> NlvtNnoh lJotH:JVt^ -]tvn @MTffi
ll
Hll{tlIILLll
*tl
ollilt
*tl
lutlJtlnll
Ftlo
nll
otlztl
tril
(f') tl
xillllll
6ll
!ilulJtl
urll
4ilotloll
ollzll
htl
xillu
zll
otl
Fll
$illul
:tl
Ftl:) tlotloll
ollul _
8ll:0-llroil;
Hr$
Irrtt!rl
r'
lltl,llrtl
oavaolq2'1tv\
lll 39vHd - en12 >a1d2 1dO9
LHoE=H N|VINnON lJot*lvr,.l llVA @Mnm
@
i
t
fi,-
TIfii-:
t, irtri jl
oo
M lltixtlsll-llul
lrtT$uTI
oo
aavdo102 ltv^
l 36VHd-e12>Zad)adoo
.L}JO9]H NIVINNOA ITOIHdVIA -IIVA @MTH
!t
18 I$IT!T
JI
Fll<
>tl
lutllti
u!llr
&ll
ollzll
tl
zll
otlFt
$illutlJtl
ur llr ?t- :lll roiliol f
oo
li Tli {{| + ++ t
fiiti$iiihM
Ilil,fi$li
=
:
5
d
:
I
E
L;
I
iili
i!
)(
ri
!i
oavdol?)'alv\
1HO9=:J NtVrNnOh rtol>avh -llvA
f-- oavdolo.'1''
I rdog=:J NtvlNflor [or:J>vhr -'1rvA b$$:l|:gll-ll:il
)
Y3:--t-':''
I
llII
ir
t'tt\r.i '.\
l"rn.\]
ii\
llr ,$
oevdo102'1tY
l>oE=> NtvfNnol^ rlotddvl^ -llv^@MIH
rlrlltr I
z
a{
luJul
F5
Dltu-
Ro
p$
ILtr
oo
oavdol)t'1tYA
idO9=E NlV.LNnoN r-Lolt>ivl^l TlVn @MNH
zo"Ftl
stl!t tlJtlull
Ttl
Etlo-z=lo,
ll.l -ila
$n|t:
i Pfllr
oavdo102'alYA
vll 'll 'l SEVHa - rJt]|a2Y) -l3loH 9Nll-glxl
rxo€fd NtvlNnol^ Itot:JEV^ ']lv^
I ll ll
I
@Mt]H
t ltllllirl
tl
-tl;tlotl
$tlLll
rtlztl
otl
Fll<ll>ll
!ullrtl
urll
FIIotl
lutl<ll
olleztl
F["oll;x {lull)i
ztl
otl
Fll<tl
itl
dll
illdtl
oilzll
oll9
=ll.
bil:x {lll )l
otl
Fll.{tl
>tllutlJtl
mll
rtlFtlutlotlzll
atllltll,.oll Y
oil;tL !olt,,illtitLllii
I I lltlll r ltt
oavdo102'ltv\
v 'l| 'r 3gvt-td - J':I-132V1 - 13-LOH tNl-lglx3
1?lo9+J NtvrNnohr rrol>>vt4 llvn @MNH
llllll
ll
-ll
urllotl
$ilLll
Ltl
otl
.F-ll
gil
tuJtl
u.rll
htl{tl
uJll
oll ezll.
Fll!oll.,x llullS
zll
otl
l- ll{tl>tl
ul lldll.
rllEtl
otloll
oll9
= ,. F .oil:XIII!lllx
rllrlrrt
aavdo102 ltv\
lll fgvHJ - en12 >aedz adoa
JEOE=:J NIVINNOH ]jOIXdVA -]IVN @MNH
@
tl
tl
=ll<[
*ll:
tLlt "
$ili
I96i: rtf' (Yrc
M f*,.=" ,. ;mx ;2ffi;#; I |j$$| 16l l-l |jjl
tlt:[ ttrT1
oo
oavdo102 1tYA
lll a6vHd - an12 >a=d2 zdoq
ldoE=d NtvJNnoH !-old:Jvt -]lv^@MTH
1Iiitj[]u$ll
=llol
Fl<
>tlutlJll
'nll
Etl
ry
oilzl
oo
iliLntl
n
eir
oavdola2 llv^
-L)JO€=> NIVTNnOh rrolu>Vld -llv
eatg
i!
--\.-.\
o
oavdola2'1tV^
rlJogfd NlvjNnol4 !-olzi:Jvld -llvn
@
ill
p1,
ll
,"';;t s
__r:".l I,e."-.,{
|r ii:il '.
.1 ii^ii
t,\ '\
'\:".[
'li .1
i.iJ
ii:'
oo
oavdol))'1tv\
-LEOE]H NIV]NNOA I-LOI:JHVhI TIVA @MNE
ll trtll
: zll. oll: ill. >tltu tl-.|tlur ll,rl
F _tl
a=ll_ d ,ltI Pilli
6Pil"
X III?' lll lI ll t
Frr
stlul lldll
III5flo-rr =llo,lltu-tl
* ollv 0Jtl
6Yilu.atr ltl
oo
oavao102 1lv^
JEOgIE NtVrNnOhl l-IOtAzJVr4 -llVA @MNH
zo,,F- ll
$iltuu--t i!rI
T]
1lo-ll
o rtl
lU - lls
$ullr
i F$lli
oavdol)t'1lv\
vll ' 'l fEVHd - 1lt-]]?vl -laroH 9Nl-LglXf
IHO9=d NlVINnol^l ItOl>2JVt^l -llVA
llr ltltr,i
_tl-tlullo{rtlLll
ztl
otlFl<tl>tlr'lll
illl
Ftlotltu
<ll
otl
Hllro :L "oil;trltl0-ll)i
@MTH
:
,ltttrlrit
Titl
,i- f,:9itl ilr:l! i'*\.
i ,>'tt i.-l'-1-." 1,,J "r''.'t,
i lrirlll
.,1-"
III 1r ti
oavdo102 -|tv^
vlt '[ 't fgvHd - lit]f2vJ -lfloH gNt.LElxf
Jdog=d NtvJNnoN uot>>vhl -ltv^@Mnm
=ll
tu tlotl
{tlLll
tllztloil
Etl
>tlutlJtl!rll
Ftl
Htl
atl
tutlotl
otl
tLtloI
utllLl
=tl
tutl
'J)tl+llLll
'll
otl
Fll<tl
>tl
tu tlJllurll
Fllotl
fitl
oll.rzl.
inll {
x itu s
Irltlllllf tt ItfttI tt
oavdo102 ]tv\
lll 36vHd - an12 >aa?!2 adoe
l.dogf> NlvlNnoh -Llotaav|^ -]lv^@MTH
.'
5
)l
oo
t-
2 \.1
F r:/|fifvv<Lr :f
M lltl ll,&ll-llbl
. -'t
:1i. - t:.a'i' "ii iI r:,.1
! -{
i.t
_.{,-.{,
i:
;, t:i
oo
ilt:[t1i1T
o4vao102'1lY
lll 3€vHJ - an12 >a=d) aaoa
r-toEfE NtvJNnoH 1lot:J>vhl -llvA @MT]H
=llotl
!il
5tl
utll
rtt
F- tl
rl llollzll
rl
zlloll
F
stl
5tl['ll
:E tlFtl:)tl
otlrnll
oo
frrTrl
|lil$l$il
e
ilil,firl
tr/#, plH
\ t,-' --1,-.-
!.fl) O
,I i.I f iE
-Ji- iL: .I
r-- at t ilill I
-\\'
t
z
:liiIi!;*EEriiiii
li
:l
i
:
E!..- ti
\
U
o4v>o102'1lVA
ldog3d NlvlNno^ ILolHHVl^ -l1v^
.--tt.--.
oav&1c'2'1tYA
1do9+J N|VINnOH l-totudvh -llVA @Mt]E
@
i6
ia
o o
oavdol22 l|lv^
JAOg*J NtVlNnOl^ rlOlH:JVld -llvA @MNH
zQltrtlstllu IlJtlur llaIFtl
o-tlo=tl
ftrll
$nll
E Otl
H{tl
tL tLrl
oo
oavdo102'-1tYA
1HO932l Nt V-LNnOh r_lOtX)JVl^ Tt Vn @MNH
6,,Fll{tltullJll!r llrtl
&tlo-tlz=ll
a rtll!-tlIoll! ullqo{
i Hfll
ofltrtl$ilul lldll
III
8=llz ,ll.
9:lli
6PII;
ilfilt
i
': ''--i'..i
ij
aavdo102'ltv\
vtl 'l 'l lgvHd - rJtlaav1 -1f10H 9Nl19lX3
-L>O9=E NIVINflOP{ ILOI:i8Vl^l -llVA
li
@MTru
tl
-tl;tlotl
silLll
ttlztl
otl
tr|l
stl
lUtlJll
urll
Ftlotl
tutl
<ll
o lzll;
bll;x .('!lllll
irliII
trltit I l rlrllii
li
@Mt]H
ll+
-tltutlo{ltlLllllrtlztl
otlFl<tl
>tl
ruil
Ell
Fotl{ilmll
atl
Hlh *
oil;tL rot ;ull?lLll$ *
zll
otl
Fll
<tl
>tl
tutlJlltull_ll+Ftl:)tl
otlotl
ollqzll;
6ll'x t
llJrtri
lttltrt
:'rlrltl
=llotlFl- {tl
>tl
tutlJtl
- - ulll
Fllltlall e= ",rll
Dtltu .-- rflll9 *-oil:Flliw["itr tL[S
o4vdo102'1tv\
vll 'll 'l ]gvlld - LJt]l:]2vJ -lf10H 9t'll19lx=
-L:lo9=d NIVINflOl4 -LIolH>VIl.t ll Vn
taIr
ll
ff^,i
Ii
$
o4vdo102'1tv\
lit fgvHJ - en-D >aad) SdoQ
r:Jog=> NtvfNnoh| !_ot:J>JVrd -ltv^@MIE
izaE.f),
trl nzt<r,l t
M @lsll--llbl
oo
oav>o102'1tv\
llr lgvHd - an1) >aad2 ado9
-L>JOE3> NIVfNnOH IlOl>J>lVhl TlVn @MTH
=lloll
Fll<tl
>tl
lUJtl
lull
Etl
fr ll
otlzll
llotlFl
$ll
5il
u.r ll:r It
F- tl:t ll0tl
rnll
oo
i|! : i iti iti ;li't i'i ti 1irt
Department of Comrnunity Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452 MEMORANDUM
To: Vail Town Corurcil
From: CommunityDwelopmentDcpartnent
Date: June 4, 1999
Mariott Red€velopment hoposal Worksession
Henry Pratt, of Gwathmey, Pratt, SchulE Architects has requested a worksession with the Town Council. The
purpose of the worksession is to:
o present lhe redwelopment proposal to the Council for preliminary rwiew prior to preparing an ordinance,
o visit the proposed development site,
r inform the Town Council of the results of the del,elopment rwiew process with lhe Planning & Environmental
Commission ard the Design Rwiew Board to dale,
I provide the Council with the opportunity to engage in a discussion with the applicant, stalf and public with
regard to lhe proposal, and
o idemf the Council's issues or concems with the redwelopment proposal.
To that en4 gafr has included the following documents in the packet for your rwiew and consideration:
I . A copy of the March 8, 1999 staff memorandum to the Plaruring & Erwironmental Commission and the
Commission's approved meeting minutes. At the March E meeting the Commission voted to recommend
approval of the major SDD amendment wift conditions.
2. A copy of the Design Review Board's recommendation to the Town Council dated June 8, 1999. The
Board's recommendation is the result of four conceptual re!'ierv meetings with the applicant.
3. A copy of a summary of the Lionshead Redwelopment Mastcr Plan and an Architectural Design Guideline
checklist including the Board's comments on thc proposal.
4. Copies of correspondence received from the community with rcgard to the proposed redwelopment.
5. Reduced copies ofthe proposed plans.
In waluating the redwelopment proposal staff has identified a number of pros and cons of the project. The pros and
cons ar€ listed below for consideration:
Pros
L The attainment of the goals of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan tfuough the implementation of
the objectives and recommendations of the Plan (renewaVredwelopment, stronger economic base,
improved infrastnrctwe, vitality/amenities).
{g *"n"uor r""
FILE COPY
75 South Fronage Road
Vail" Colorado 81657
970-479-213V479-2139
FAX 970479-2452
Department of Community Developmcnt
May26, 1999
Heory Pratt
Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz Architecls, P.C.
1000 Smth Frmtage Rmd West
Vail, Colsado 81657
Re: Marriott off-site impovanents
Dear Henry,
The Lim$ead lv{a*er Plm and enabling adinances discus the need to assess reasoable off-site
impovements to specific developments. The lv{aster Plan has identified over $15 millim in Frotage Rmd
improvements from the main Vail Roundabout to the Cascade Village. This is a distance of approximately
7300 ft. and will cmtinue appnoximately t€o major intersectims.
The Tom bas requested frqn the Colcado Departmart of Transpotatio, $5 millim to povide
imFwem€nts. The ranaining $5 millio is assumod to directly be attibutable to tbe ten intersectims;
equaling $500,000 per intersectio.
Those dwelqments accessing the two intersectims of West Limshead Circle will be cmtributing to the
imFovern€ots of these trvo intersectims, In ader to determine, at this timg the attrihrtable numb€r of
fips to each intersection, the cornbined trips of boih inlersectims were deterrnined.
The Traffic Study fm the Limshead Master Plan shons an increase of vehicle tips at both intersectios of
127 rips in the a.rn fa a total of 640 rips and an increase of 195 tips in the p.rrI. peak ha"u for a tcal of
795trips Thelvlarriott'spqoealaddsl0nenrDU's,4newcmdosand6ElIlJ'sintheexistinghotel.
The timeshar€ prqiects adds 66 new units.
The Sannday peak ftctor is .738 x 66 = 49 = 25% of $ I,000,000 = $250,000.
195
Sinceely,
F'(I Jl-o-ta-
Geoge Ruther, AEP
?,,u-,
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Xc: Greg llall, Acting Director of Public Wmks
€p*,uo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cons
l.
2.
The redevelopment will aa as a catalyst for other redevelopment projects in the Lionshead area.
Improved @estrian circulation through the consfuAion of sidewalk and steetscape inprovements.
The enluncement of the Gore Creek sheam corridor through sfeam bank rcstoration and revegcatior.
The elimination of an unsighfly surhce parking dec*.
The pro,ision of employee housing opporhrnities for up to ten employees in the immediate Lionslread area
The proposal adds new building height and building mass to the property which may have impacts on
adjacent poperties.
Pot€ntial hcr€ases in both vehicuhr (car, bu, delivery truck) and pedestrian tmffic in the immediale ar€as
surrounding the development site.
3. The loading and delivery configuration as proposed may result in periods of delay and/or congeslior.
4. The additional building height increases the "shade and shadod' effects ofthe building on adjacent
properties.
t
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINAL AGENDA
Wednesday, May 19, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCFI - Community Dsvelopment D,epartment
Clark Brittain
BillPierce
Melissa Greenauer
Tom Weber (PEC)
stTEvtstTs
MEMBERS ABSENT
Hans Woldrich
1. Scorpio - 131 West Meadow Drive2. Dobson lce Arena - 321 E. Lionshead Circle3. Vail lnternational- 300 E. Lionshead Circle4. Wand - 381 Beaver Dam Circle5. Hoversten-95 Forest Road6. Waterhouse-285 Forest Road7. Austrian - 696 Forest Road8. Gold Peak Skier Tunnel- 458 Vail Valley Drive9. Lot 13, Forest Glen -439 Glen Falls Lane10. VailMountain School-3160 Katsos Ranch Road
Driver: George
FILE rif/P|
11:30 pm
1dn pm
I'EIIBERS PRESENT
PUBUC HEARING . TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Austrian residence - Conceptual review of a re.ryrodel of a primary/secondary residence.
696 Forest Road / Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village 6"' Filing.
Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. NeilAustrian, represented by Robert L. Arnold
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
2. Hoversten residence - Conceptual review of a new single-family residence.
95 Forest Road / Lot 32, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Philip Hoversten, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins Architects
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE:4-0
CONSENT APPBOVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That a Public Works and Zoning approval be required.
3. Wand B Development, LLC - Conceptual review of a new primaryisecondary residence
with a Type ll employee housing unit.
381 Beaver Dam Circle / Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3'o Filing.
Applicant: Wand B Development LLC, represented by Jay Peterson
3:00 pm
Brent
Dominic
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
4. Golden Peak Ski Base - Skier tunnel. Dominic
458 VailValley Drive / Tract B, Vail Village 7'n Filing.
Applicant: VailAssociatesMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 2, 1999
5. Antler's - Final review of a proposed expansion. George
680 W. lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block'1, Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVineMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TAELED UNTIL JUNE 2, 1999
6. Dobson lce Arena - Final review locker room/loading dock expansion, George
321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2no Filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represented by Odell Architects
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That brick pavers be installed at the entrance to the loading dock.2. That a revised landscape plan be submitted.
7. Vail Intemational Condominiums - Removal of trees. George
300 E. Lionshead Circle / Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing #2.
Applicant: VaillntemationalCondominiumAssociation
MOTION: Tom Weber SECOND:Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0-1 (Bill Pierce abstained)
APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the one tree on Vail International property be removed and no trees on Town of Vail
property be removed.
8. Waterhouse residence - Final review of a new garage. Allison
285 Forest Road/Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1".
Applicant: Steve & Linda Waterhouse, represented by Steven Riden
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE:4-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the rail on the east be wood, rather than stone.
9. Lot 13, Forest Glen - Conceptual review of a new single-family residence. Allison
4439 Glen Falls Lane / Lot 13, Forest Glen Subdivision.
Applicant: Lot 13, LLC represented by S.H. Cole Construction
MOTION:Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Bill Pierce VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That it meet Public Works and planning approval.
' 10. Scorpio - Gate and parking improvements George
tgt West Meadow Drive/Part df Lot 1, Part of Block D, Vail Village 2nd.
Applicant: ScorpioCondominiumAssociationMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL JUNE 2, 1999
11. Lot 25, Gtacier Ct. - Conceptual review of a new primaryisecondary residence. George
1854 Glacier Ct./Lot 25, Block 2, Lionsridge #3.
Applicant: Pat DauphinaisMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTTLJUNE 2, 1999
12. VailMountain School-Temporarystructure. ^- George
3160 Katsos Ranch Road/Pirt ot Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village t lh fiting.
Applicant: Vail Mountain School, represented by Pam Hopkins
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
13. The Marriot (Lionshead) -Conceptual review of a major exterior alteration George
and construction of a new interval ownership club.
715 W. Lionshead Circle / Marriott MarK Morcus Subdivision
Applicant: HMC Corporation, represented by East-West Partners and Gwathmey-PrattMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONCEPTUAL - BECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL
Staff Approvals
Christopher-Wollard residence - Driveway snowmelUre-alignment; revised landscaping. Brent
2550 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 34, Block 2, Vail Village 13" Filing.
Applicant: Rocky Christopher
Fredin residence - Finish unfinished basement. Brent
2091 -A Zermatt Lane, Vail Commons #5B/Unplatted, Vail das Schone Filing f3.
Applicant: Peter M. Fredin
Davie residence - Driveway snowmelustamped concrete pavers. Brent
776 Potato Patch/Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: John Davie
La Bottega - Addition of pavers and deck extension. Brent
100 E. M-eadow Drive/Lots M & O, Block 5D, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Stephen Virion
Meadow Vail Place Penthouse - 250 addition. Allison
44 W. Meadow Drive/Lot 1, VailVillage 2no.
Applicant: SpraddleCreekProperties
Sonnenalp Hotel & Spa - New canopy (revised) * Brent
20 Vail Road/A portion of Lot K, Block 5E, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Johannes Faessler
One Vail Place - Exterior painting. Brent
244Wall StreeUA portion of Bbck 5A, Vail Village 1"t.
Applicant: Hill, Drescher, Smead & Wells
BrentWall Street Building -Skylight addition.
225Wall StreeuPart of Lots B&C, Block 5C, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Wall Street Building Condo Association
Schofield residence - Stairuay replacement. Brent
1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley 1"'.
Applicant: John Schofield
Vail Associates Pump House & Tennis Courts - Replace 5 spruce trees on W. Forest Rd. Dominic
615 W. Forest Rd.iUnplatted, adjacent to Vail Lionshead 3'o Filing.
Applicant: VailAssociates
Vail East Condominiums -Window replacement. Brent
4093 Spruce Waylt/ail East, Bighorn 3'o.
Applicant: Vail East Lodging Association
McDonald's - Two new wall signs. Brent
2112 N. Frontage Road WesVLot 2b, a resub ol Lot 2, Vail das Schone Filing tr2.
Applicant: George Greenwald
Ginzberg - Bedroom addition. Jetf
4034 Bighom Road, #1/Lot 1, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision.
Applicant: Stewart & Lisa Ginzberg
Eagle Bahn Gondola - New deck on south side of gondola. Jetf
Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1"t.
Applicant: VailAssociates
Shaper- New garage. .. Jetf
2645 Bald lrlountaiiRoad/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village 13th.
Applicant: Steve Shaper
Roost Lodge - Move equipment to non-visible location. Dominic
1793 N. Frontage Rd. Wesvlots 10,11 & 12, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Rodney Cofton
Stern - Entry addition. Jefl
1517 Vail Villey Drive,#1tLol12, Block 3, Vail Valley 1s.
Applicant: Don & Ann Stem
Marrion Mountain Resort - New awning. Brent
715 W. Lionshead Circle/Manion Mark, Morcus Subdivision.
Applicant: selim wahba
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular qflc_e
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 Sot
Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356, Telephor
for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
May 17, 1999
George Ruther
Town of Vail Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: response to May 13 list of Marriott Lionshead DRB issues
Dear George and members of the DRB:
Here is our response/ explanation to the DRB comments listed in the May 13, 1999 memo
from George Ruther. As you are aware, many of the comments predate the May 5, 1999
DRB meeting and may have already been addressed through changes proposed at that
meeting.
4.3.1.2- North South Orientation of Buildings:
l. Open up a light corridor between the existing hotel and the Gore Crcek Club to get
light back down to the street and sidewalk.:
Changes to the proposed design of the Phase 2a building and the Gore Creek Club were
presented at the May sth DRB hearing. In the May 196 hearing we will present additional
changes wherein all units on the top floor of the north wing of the Club have been relocated
to the south end of the Club. This change will provide a significant reduction in height at the
northeast corner of the Club.
2. The ridge lines of the improvements should be lowered and a greater space left
between the buildings to maintain the view to the mountain from the Vail Spa.:
In the May 50' DRB hearing, we presented significant lowering of building height at Phase 1,
Phase 2a and at the Gore Creek Club north wing. As described above, we will propose on
the 19s additional lowering of the height of the northeast corner of the Club's north wing.
The wording of the Master Plan states that "future development and redevelopment
<should> orient vertical building masses along a north-south axis whenever possible".
Whenever possible. Increasing the separation between the existing Hotel Phase 2a and the
Gore Creek Club is not possible due to the constraints imposed by the existing parking
structure. We have located the majority of our density in a north-south manner along
t
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 2
the west edge of the property. This corridor is not identified in the Master Plan (see Map O)
as a view corridor but we have made the changes nonetheless,
4.10- Gatewavs. Landmarks. and Portals:
l. The site planning of the Gore Creek Club creates a building which is too inclusive and
inward facing resulting in a lack of regard for the public spaces around the building and the
existing or potential surrounding uses.:
The only elevation that is "inward" facing (it is oriented towards the mountain) is the west
elevation. All other sides face out. The west elevation has been designed with fenestration,
dormers, french balconies, etc that gives it the appearance that some units face outward. In
addition, the Owner of the property to the west has publicly indicated full support for our
design of the west elevation and has acknowledged that their site planning would need to
respect the conditions that are created by our building. The south and north elevations- the
only ones facing public spaces- are within the restrictions and intent of the Master Plan and
the Design guidelines. As of the May 19rh hearing, we will have made changes suggested by
the DRB to ALL sides of the building.
2. There are opportunities to create a sense of arrival at the entrance portals to the
property and building:
Our proposal includes improvements to every point of arrival to the existing Hotel including
the landscaped portal at the southeast that was presented to the DRB on May 5'h. An
additional metal gate will be presented to the DRB on May 1gth. The point of arrival for the
Gore Creek Club is clearly expressed at the street and at the point of check-in. Again, we
would like to point out that most people arriving at the Club know where they are going
when they get to Vail.
hearing so that we can understand the comment more fullv-
3. The entrances to the property need to be more inviting and less awkward.:
See item 2 above. Furthermore, the proposed improvements to the existing porte cochere
at the main entrance to the Hotel are dramatic. In addition to greater height and width of
cover. skylights are being proposed to allow more light into the arrival area at the door. At
the Gore Creek Club, the porte cochere extends as close to the street as allowed and its
height is sympathetic to the units directly behind it. lf the DRB thinks this porte cochere
should be made larger, we will look at it.
4. The basic aspects of site planning such as points of arrival, loading/delivery, pedestrian
circulation are not addressed in the current proposal.:
As presented in great detail at the May 5th hearing, points of arrival, loading and delivery and
pedestrian circulation have been fully addressed. These items all meet the requirements of
the client and are in conformance with the requirements of the Master Plan. Loading and
delivery has been discussed in great detail with the operators of the Gore Creek Club, the
Town Staff and the PEC. All parties in these discussions have acknowledged the adequacy
of the proposals. Pedestrian circulation internal to the Marriott site has been significantly
enhanced in our proposal. This circulation is not public circulation and is not mentioned in
the Master Plan.
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 3
5. Morc attention needs to be given to the sense of arrival at the southeast corner of the
propertY.i
We do not feel that an architectural portal is appropriate at the southeast corner of the
existing Marriott Property but will present a metal gate at the May 19th meeting. As
presented at the May 5s hearing we are also proposing to enhance this point of arrival with
additional landscaping that is consistent with our proposals to provide a more natural setting
on the south side of the Hotel. The pedestrian easement shown on the plat ends halfway to
the creek. Even so, our proposed landscape plan does provide a continuous and visually
interesting route to the bike path- a significant improvement over the existing conditions.
4.10.2- Landmarks:
l. The proposed landmark elements are too big and are not in proportion with the
building.:
On May 5tn we presented a revision to Phase 2a that removed one of the landmark elements
and significantly altered the appearance of the landmark element atop Phase ll. We feel that
the remaining landmark element is designed to be in proportion with the building and is the
size necessary to meet the intent of the Master Plan (more discussion of this below). Also, a
comment in George's checklist down under section 8.4.1 .2 indicates that not everyone feels
that the landmark is too big.
2. Are the landmark elements necessary?:
Page 8-5 of the Master Plan, paragraph 3 states "All buildings in Lionshead, both existing
and new development, should seek to fulfill the roles of landmarks...": The Master Plan
therefore encourages landmark elements. The largest hotel in Lionshead, if not all of Vail,
would seem to be a logical location to implement this intent. In response to DRB concerns,
we have already eliminated one landmark element atop phase 2a.
5.4- Gore Greek Corridor:
|. There appears to be no relationship between the existing and proposed building and the
Gore Creek stream corridor. A relationship should be created.:
We are proposing to go to great lengths to remove the vertical separation (the 2O' high
berml between the existing hotel and the bike path. Our landscape plans show that we
propose to significantly enhance both the visual and physical access to the stream tract from
the courtyard south of the Hotel. At the Gore Creek Club, we presented on May 5'h a
change in the configuration of the south wing that gives us direct on-grade access to the
Bike path. We are also proposing to add significant landscaping between the Gore Creek
Club and the bike path in addition to improving the landscaping south of the bike path.
2. Pedestrian circulation has not been addressed; especially along the stream tract.:
The changes presented on May Srn addressed this issue.
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 4
8.3.4.4- Building Finishes:
l. The proposed application of exterior stone makes the building appear to be dipped in
stone. The height of the stone around the buildings should vary with massing and building
forms in mind.':
No additional stone is being proposed for the existing hotel except at the wall around the
expanded loading dock. Design Guidelines Section A.4.2.4 requires a clear definition of base,
middle and top but does not require or suggest that the height of the base needs to vary.
This section also talks about the importance of establishing "key datums" li.e. lines ol
referencel. We feel that our proposed use of stone veneer satisfies this intent in the Master
Plan Design Guidelines. The use of veneer does vary quite a bit in height on all four
elevations of the Gore Creek Club. On each elevation we feel that the stone does indeed
help establish the desired datum and sense of base- even inside the courtyard at the roof
garden level. lf the DRB would like us to lower this datum or remove stone in certain areas,
we will study the possibilities. Finally, the existing parking structure does not have adequate
structural capacity to allow for the installation of stone veneer on all exposed surfaces. We
have chosen here to use the stone as an expression of structure and to break the existing
precast walls down into a rhythm of smaller areas.
8.4.1.2- Building'Roles':
l. No 'sense of arrival to a grcat place" has been provided.:
As one approaches the existing Hotel from afar, our proposed landmark roof element
provides a significant indication of the point of arrival. As one gets closer, this element
becomes less dominant (pyramid shape fades in mass) and the various improved points of
arrival start to become dominant. As discussed above we have made substantial and
significant improvements to the Hotel porte cochere. Arrival to the Gore Creek Club is clearly
denoted by its porte cochere which extends almost all the way to the street (GCC members
will know where they are goingl. lf you are looking for a portal to this side of Lionshead, we
feel it should be at the intersection of the Frontage road and Lionshead Circle or further west
as appropriate.
2. The reality of how the buildings will function has not been addressed.:
We presented a pedestrian circulation plan at the May 5tn meeting demonstrating the
relationship of some of the interior spaces of the buildings to how pedestrian traffic will flow
and how this flow relates to the Master Plan. We are happy to answer any additional
questions in this area. In addition. a great deal of thought has gone into the internal
functioning of the Gore Creek Club, the point of arrival. front desk, Owners' lounge, internal
amenities, roof garden, ski storage, etc. We can present the internal functioning of the
building at the May 19n hearing if desired.
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 5
8.4.1.3- Pedestrian Streets:
| . A landscape buffer is needed at the street frontage of the Gore Creek Club.l
We have addressed this issue and will present our proposals at the next DRB meeting on
May 19th.
8.4. 1 .4- Transition Soaces:
1. The space betvveen the commercial use and the main building of the Gore Creek Club
is a 'no man's land". Consider connecting the buildings.
Please refer to our sheet A2.3 to see that on the east side of the Gore Creek Club arrival
ramp this "no man's land" is actually used for parking and bicycle storage adjacent to the
ski/bike storage room. In addition to these uses. the gap between the buildings serves to
provide additional light to the Entry and Arrival spaces. On the west side, we considered
connecting the buildings and felt the benefits were not equal to the disadvantages (especially
forthe Vail Spa), The drawings that will be presented to the DRB on May 19 will show the
buildingsconnected. @2. The use of the top of the parking structure does not appear to be very well thought
out.
The uses on top of the parking structure are in accordance with the programming needs of
the client and the future guest. At the north end, closest to the Owners' lounge and the
vertical core (also the end with the best sun and viewsl, we have located the hot tubs in a
garden of trees and plantings. In the middle we have placed a sun terrace. This separates
the hot tub garden from the free play area where we envision children playing tag, frisbees,
etc. On May 5s we presented a change to the south lawn adding a connection to the break
in the south wing. All of this combines to provide protected, secure areas for the Gore Creek
Club guest to enjoy year-round.
3. The commercial space on the north side of the Gore Creek Club is too close to the
street and should be moved back to respect the lO foot setback.
Section 8.4.1 .4 talks about the need to create "a layer of frontage with interest and life" as
a transition between public and semi-public. The location of the existing parking structure
provides only a small area in which to place this desired element so the setbacks we are
proposing (proposed setbacks vary from 2'-6" to 1O'-O) are the only way we can meet this
Master Plan intent. Pushing all faces of the retail back 1O' would make the spaces too small
for retail tenants). At the request of the DRB at the first meeting, we have already moved
these spaces as far back as we feel we can. Since we are talking about an important Master
Plan concept, we feel that the ability to provide this transition outweighs the need to satisfy
building setbacks in this location. I would like to point out that the front elevation of the
retail steps along the property line. This provides more of the visual interest sought by the
Master Plan. I will also point out that changing the grades in this area by 3' to allow the
retail (which must be accessiblel to push back onto the existing structure is not really
feasible and is discouraged by the bottom paragraph on page 8-15,
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 6
8.4.2.2- Buildino Form and Massino:
l. The building elevation along the west propefty line is to straight and needs to be
articulated, both vertically and horizontally.
On May 5s we presented a west building elevation that has is significantly more articulated
vertically and horizontally than before. Given the constraints of the existing parking structure
and the need for our new parking extension to line up with the existing structure, there is
little additional opportunity to break up the straight line of the west elevation. This elevation
is in full conformance with the Design Guidelines. There are no wall panels exceeding 35'in
any direction and the building steps exceed the recommended 24" minimum step (the
obvious exceptions to this are the faces of the parking structure and the elevator towers
where a 24" step is not possible). Furthermore, please refer to Section 8.4.2.3, page 8-18,
middle paragraph. The Master Plan acknowledges that "a building's greatest vertical mass...
should occur on the frontage with the least volume of pedestrian traffic and should be
oriented north-south". The west property line is not identified in the Master Plan as a
primary or secondary pedestrian route (see map O) and certainly has less pedestrian traffic
than the other three sides.
2. The mass of the roof proposed and the additional volume it creates is excessive and
should be reduced in scale.
We assume that this comment relates to the remaining landmark element atop Phase 2. This
is discussed above and according to George's memo, the comments on this are not in
complete agreement. The pyramid shaped addition is very efficient in that it results in a mass
that will disappear as one approaches the building and yet at a distance, it provides the scale
necessary to fit with the existing Marriott. We studied the scale of this element very
carefully and feel it is a good fit with the Hotel. Furthermore, this element has no impact on
light and air for any of the adjacent properties. lt also is an effective way to break the line of
the existing roof.
3. The spires over the stair and elevator towers are out of proportion making the buildings
appear to be top heavy.
The height and width of the spires is what is required for elevator overhead and machine
rooms. Our proposed design provides visual interest at the west end of Lionshead until they
are blocked from view by development of the West Day Lot. I also refer you to the intent of
the Master Plan as stated in the last sentence of page 8-32, "The...image of Lionshead
takes its cue from the simple ... forms of European alpine villages." The design intent for
these particular roofs was to provide the look of european belltowers in a part town where
there are no churches.
8.4.2.4- Exterior Walls:
1. Address fenestration, wail surtace planes, and exterior building materials of all the
buildings.
Colors and materials were submitted back in March and have yet to be discussed in any
detail. To help with the cooming discussion we offer the following:
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 7
o Fenestration (existing buildingsl- no changes are proposed except that EIFS window
and door trim in a wood tone color is being proposed in some locations.r Fenestration (Gore Creek Club)- Windows proposed meet the Design Guidelines in
terms of shape, variety of shapes. divided lites, color and finish. Trim will be wood,
Wall surface planes {existing buildings including parking garage}- We have made some
changes to the wall surfaces of the existing hotel buildings, most notably to remove some of
the existing "floating frame" and to reduce apparent wall area by lowering eaves. We
cannot meet the 35'rules in all locations and are not required to do so under Section 8.3.1,
. paragraph 2, Our intent is to take these buildings back to a simpler, cleaner less
dated look- the primary directive of the Master Plan.r Wall surface planes (Gore Creek Clubl- We meet the letter of the Design Guidelines as
explained previously.
r Exterior Building materials (existing buildings)- lt is our intent to replace much of the
existing wood siding. Where the existing siding is left in place, it will be painted to look
more natural and to decrease the visibility of the defects in the material. The new material
will be EIFS. Most, but not all existing roofs (standing seam metal) will be replaced or
covered with asphalt shingles meeting the requirements of the Design Guidelines. Existing
wood siding and pipe railings will be replaced with new steel railings in the color submitted.
o Exterior Building materials (Gore Creek Club)- All materials being proposed meet the
requirements of the Design Guidelines and the requirements for the various levels of the
building.
2. Phase ll of the Hotel is intended to become a "flagship" building, yet the proposed
exterior building materials are not of "flagship" quality. The Bavaria Haus is an example of a
'flagship' hotel.
We understand the sentiment associated with this comment, but would like to point out that
all proposed materials are allowed by the Design Guidelines and are top quality within their
respective classif ications. Except for the roofing, all are the same as the materials found on
the Bavaria Haus- a new building. The proposed asphalt roofing is also top-of-the-line and
will have an appearance far superior to the asphalt shingles that are so prevalent in
Lionshead today.
3. The east and west elevations with the exposed parking structure is unacceptable.
These areas need to be addressed.
Structural analysis of the existing parking structure has indicated that there is no excess
structural capacity, so leaving some (if not all) areas of the existing precast exposed is
unavoidable, We have attempted to use stone veneer in limited amounts to break down the
size of the precast panels and to express some transmittance of load to the ground. Under
the largest masses, we have attempted to provide the base level datum requested by the
Master Plan. We intend to paint the balance of the exposed precast to minimize its impact.
This will give the same look and texture as if it were covered with EIFS.
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 8
8.4.2.5- Exterior Doors and Windows:
1. The hotel rooms need to extend outward to fill in the void spaces created in the areas
on the sloping roof.
Marriott has emphatically indicated that this is not desired at this time. The additional cost
cannot be recovered in the room rates and raising the rates is not an option at this time. In
order to address this concern, we have revised our designs to lower the roofs. This reduces
roof mass (a previous DRB comment) and decreases the space between the balconies and
the roof.
8.4.2.6- Balconies. Guardrails, and Handrails:
l. The stacking of the decks and windows is too repetitive and does not comply with the
intent of the Design Guidelines. The proposal makes it too easy to read the gridlines of the
building.
This comment misinterprets the intent of the Design Guidelines. Where page 8-1O, middle
paragraph discourages grid layouts in plan, page 8-29 states that windows should be
"organized into fairly regular patterns to establish rhythm and continuity". Our design meets
the intent and the letter of the Design Guidelines.
2. The decks and balconies on the existing hotel need to be articulated.
This is exactly our intent in removing most of the existing outer frame on the buildings and in
removing the solid wood railing walls at the Phase 1 balconies. Additionally, we propose to
install open metal railings per the Design Guidelines to further articulate the balconies. We
also vary the expression of the balconies from building to building and within each building
face. We therefore feel that all the balconies (including some new variations to be introduced
on May 19th) comply.
8.4.2.7- Roofs:
l. Why does the height of the building have to increase to achieve the sloping roof form?
The height does not have to increase to achieve the sloping roof form, the height has to
increase to achieve a non-linear roof form. The Master Plan calls for this additional height.
Page 8-20, last sentence of top paragraph specifically states that "regardless of final built
height, buildings shall avoid monotonous, unbroken ridge lines...". Figures 8-3 and 8-4 on
page 8-6 and figure 8-17 on page 8-21 show additional height being added to a building to
achieve this result. The existing Marriott buildings all have flat roofs and straight line
parapets. We added height because the Master Plan recommends it and the height we
added has minimal impact on the light and air to adjacent properties. Even so, in response to
DRB comments we have reduced the additional height to achieve a discontinuous ridge line
and in the case of Phase lla we have replaced the larger landmark feature with a smaller one
that does not cover the existing elevator tower.
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 9
2. Are the sloping root forms necessary on the existing hotel.
They are not necessary but they are specifically encouraged by the Master Plan. Our basic
design goal for improving the existing hotels, and one specifically promoted by the top
paragraph on page 8-7 of the Design Guidelines, is to lower wall heights by adding sloping
mansard roofs to existing buildings (see also page 8-32 and 8-34).
3. The application of the sloping roof form on the Phase I building in particular appears
phony and contrived.
We have revised this elevation to break up the simplicity of the previously presented roof .
The changes will also give more emphasis to the existing entry at the northeast corner of
Phase 1.
4. The steepness of the sloping roof creates a wall rather than a roof.
Page 8-23, second paragraph calls for roofs that add to the overall long-distance roofscape
of Lionshead and adds that roofs should disappear as approached on foot. Page 8-7 allows
for steeply sloping mansard roofs. Furthermore, the application of windows and doors in
dormers breaks up the plane of the mansard and leaves no question that it is a roof. We feel
that our proposed designs meet the intent of the Master Plan requirements and would like to
point out that the use of mansards is quite common in large (hotell buildings throughout the
world as a means to reduce apparent height.
8.4.2.8- Fireolaces and Chimnevs:
l. Chimney caps and the portions of the chinmeys need to be examined.
We will add the required chimney tops and adjust chimney heights to be more consistent.
8.4.2.9- Dorail:
l. The treatment of exterior details lacks consistency throughout the project.l
This is intentional. The level of detail proposed varys from building to building and will vary
from elevation to elevation. This is an attempt to break the Marriott complex into smaller
discrete entities. Our proposal follows through on this concept with color as well. The
Master Plan does not require full compliance with the Design Guidelines for existing buildings
and the level of detail being proposed for the GCC is in accordance with the Design
Guidelines.
2. The guality of the exterior finishes are not up to our rcsort standards.
All proposed materials are allowed by the Design Guidelines. lf the approved materials in the
Design Guidelines are not up to our resort standards, then the Design Guidelines should be
amended.
Ruther/DRB response
May 17, 1999
Page 10
Other-:
l. The applicant's options are significantly limited given the existing conditions and
constraints.
This comment is very important. The existing structures, including the parking structure at
the west do not allow us to make many of the changes desired by the DRB. With existing
structures, these changes add up quickly become disincentives to redevelopment.
2. The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Architectural Design Guidelines should be
studied in great detail to determine compliance of the proposal with the guidelines.
The applicant has studied the Guidelines in great detail and feels that the proposed design
meets all of the intentions and the detailed rules contained in the Master Plan. We do
require conditional approval of our roof slopes but have maintained all along that the steeper
slopes provide substantially increased benefits to the Town than would be provided by roof
slopes within the 12:12 limit in the Guidelines.
3. The project lacks regard for the adjacent properties.
All aspects of our proposal meet the intent of the Master Plan, To the south, we are in full
compliance with setbacks and height but continue to make changes that are being
recommended by the DRB. To the west, we again meet the requirements for height and
have done as much as we can to mitigate the limitations of an existing building. Our
neighbor to the west has indicated to the DRB his full support of our design. To the north,
we again comply fully with the intent of the Master Plan. We continue to make changes to
the height and configuration despite the fact that we are under the height limits, do not
infringe on any defined view corridors and do not impact anyone's light and air.
We hope this response helps to further explain our proposal and enhance the DRB'S
understanding of it.
GWATHMEY PRATT
/.
att, AIA
REVTSEO 5/5/99
ftl,t
cnpr
11:00 pm
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINALAGENDA
Wednesday, May 5, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
pRoJEcr oRTENTATToN / LUNcH- Town Council Chambers
MEMBERS ABSENT
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce (left at 5:00 p.m.)
Hans Woldrich
Melissa Greenauer
Tom Weber (PEC)
slTE V|SITS
1. Vail Interfaith Chapel- 19 Vail Road2. Waterhouse - 285 Forest Road3. Adams -765 West Forest Road4. Dobson lce Arena - 321 E. Lionshead Circle5. Scalise -2567 Arosa Drive6. Lot 25 - 1854 Glacier Ct.7. Wiley- 1538 Spring Hill Lane8. Valleau - 4839 Meadow Drive9. Shaper - 2645 Bald Mountain Road10. Lot 4, Gore Creek Sub. - 5166 Black Gore Drive
1 1. Kinzelberg - Lot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates
Driver: George
2dD pm
MEMBERS PRESENT
PUBUC HEARING . TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. The Marriott (Lionshead) - Conceptual review ol a major exterior alteration
and construction of a new interval ownership club.
715 W. Lionshead Circle / Marriott Mark. Morcus Subdivision
Applicant: HMC Corporation, represented by East-West Partners and Gwathmey-Pratt
CONCEPTUAL- NO VOTE
2. Lionsquare North - New awning.
660 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 8, Vail Lionshead 1".
Applicant: LionsquareNorthCondoAssociation
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 5-0
3:00 pm
George
Dominic
COMiENT APPROVED-Subject to final staff review.
REV1SED 5/6/1993. Adam residence - Conceptual review of a proposed*remodel. Brent
765 West Forest Road/Lot 8, Block 2, Vail Village 6''.
Applicant: Nancy Adam, represented by Fritzlen, Pierce, Smith
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
4. Henkes residence - Final review of a new primary/secondary residence. Allison
2824 Snowberry Drive I Lol17, Block 9, Intermountain.
Applicant: Andrew Henkes
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 5-0
CONSENTAPPROVED
5. Wiley residence - Conceptual review for a new primary residence and Type ll Allison
employee housing unit.
1 538 Spring Hill Lane/Lot 14, Block 3, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: WileyFamilyPartnership
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
6. Valleau Residence - Conceptual review of a remodel/addition to an existing residence. Allison
4839 Meadow Drive/Lot 17, Block 5, Bighorn Fifth.
Applicant: Bob & Kathy Valleau
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:5-0
CONSENT APPROVED
Scalise Residence - Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence.
2567 Arosa Dr./Lot 9, Block E, Vail Das Schone 1''
Allison
Applicant: Dennis Scalise
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
8. Waterhouse residence - New garage. Jeff
285 Forest Road/Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1$.
Applicant: Steve & Linda Waterhouse, represented by Steven Riden
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
9. Shaper residence - Review of a new garage. .. Jetf
2645 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village 13"'.
Applicant: Steve Shaper
MOTION:BillPierce SECOND:HansWoldrich VOTE:5-0
TABLED UNTIL MAY 19, 1999
10. Vail Interfaith Chapel - Remodel/addition at existing facility. Jeff
19 Vail Road / Lot J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Vail Religious Foundation, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects
MOTION:BillPierce SECOND:HansWoldrich VOTE:5-0
TABLED UNTIL MAY 19, 1999
7.
BEVTSED 5/619911. Kinzelberg residence - Conceptual review. Jeff
Lot 4, Spraddle Creek Estates.
Applicant: Harvey Kinzelberg, represented by Hans Berglund
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
12. Grand Traverse Lot 16 - Final review of a new single-family residence. George
1800 Lionsridge Loop / Lot 1 6, Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision.
Applicant: Dauphinais-Moseley Construction
MOTION: Melissa Greenauer SECOND: Tom Weber VOTE: 4-0
APPROVED PER REVISED PLANS
13. Lot 25, Glacier Ct. -Conceptual review of a proposed new primary/secondary residence. George
1854 Glacier Ct./Lot 25, Block 2, Lionsridge #3.
Applicant: Pat Dauphinais
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
14. Westhaven Club & Lodge - Final review of a proposed new Fractional Fee Club George
and employee housing project.
1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A.
Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:5-0
CONSENT APPROVED
15. Dobson lce Arena - Conceptual review locker room/loadiqg dock expansion. George
321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2no Filing.
Applicant: Vail Recreation District, represenled by Odell Architects
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
16. Lot 4, Gore Creek Subdivision.- Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence.George
5166 Black Gore Drive/Lot 4, Gore Greek Subdivision.
Applicant: Greg Amsden
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
Staff Aoorovals
Brooktree Condominiums -Stairuay/anding replacement. Brent
980 Vail View Drive/A portion of Block B, Lions Ridge Filing 1.
Applicant: BrooktreeTownhomesHOA
Burillo residence / Northwind development - Revised landscape plan. Brent
365 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 16, Block 1, Vail Village 1" Filing.
Applicant: Northwind Development
Rizk residence - Bedroom/dining room addition. Brent
740 Sandy Lane/Lot 4, Block 2, Potato Patch Filing #2.
Applicant: Oscar Rizk
REVTSED 5/6/99
Axelrod residence - Exterior repaint. George
2578 Arosa Drive/Lot 1, Block C, Vail das Schone #1.
Applicant: Art Axelrod
Ketcham residence - Changes to driveway. Allison
4301 Glen Falls Laneilot 1, Forest Glen.
Applicant: Linda Ketcham
Berndt residence - Site plan changes. Allison
756 Potato Patch/Lot 4, Block 2, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Wolfgang Berndt
MacLean residence - lnterior conversion of crawl space. George
1330 Sandstone Drive, Overlook, Unit #121G-4, Vail Lionsridge.
Applicant: John MacLean
Walzer residence - Addion of stone veneer to deck rail and chimney. George
333 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 41, Block 7, Vail Village 1sI.
Applicant: George Schaeffer Construction Co.
Timber Falls Building #18 - North side deck extension. Brent
4459 Timberfalls Ct. #1 8/Timberfalls Condominiums.
Applicant: Timber Falls Phase lX Association
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's oftice, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
FILE
Discussion on Employee Housing Generation Ordinance.
(45 mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Review considerations for
implementing a housing generation ordinance and direct staff on
next steps.
PEC/DRB Review. (15 mins.)
Discussion of Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1gg9, an ordinance
amending Special Development District #7, The Maniott, allowing
for interior and exterior remodel of phase l, phase ll & phase ltd
and the construction of the Gore Creek Club and sefting forth
details in regard thereto. (30 mins.)
AGTION REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Listen to a presentation by
the applicant and the staff and provide any directions the Council
may have prior to first reading of the ordinance.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: On Monday, March 8, 1999, the
Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission reviewed and
recommended approval of the proposed major amendment to
Sgeclal Development District #7, The Maniott, pursuant to section
12-16'6 of the Town of VailZoning Regulations.
In preparing for first reading of an amending ordinance, the
applicant has requested a work session with the Town Council to
discuss the proposal.
| "opy of the staff memorandum and the final agenda from the
March 8s meeting are enclosed for reference.
STAFF REGOMMENDATION: As this is a work session. staff will
not be making a recommendation at this time.
Information Update. (10 mins.)
Council Reports. (10 mins.)
Other. (10 mins.)
Executive Session - Personnel Mafters. (45 mins.)
Adjournment - 4:45 p.m.
|,r/PlrVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1999
2:OO P.M. AT ToV couNcIL GHAMBERS
AGENDA
NorE: Time of items are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be reriedupon to determine atwhat time Council will consider an liem.
1.
Russ Forrest
Nina Timm
2.
George Ruther
J.
George Ruther
Henry Pratt
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:
(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwLL BE oN TUESDAY,4t20tg9, BEGINNING AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL cHAMBERS.
THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwLL BE oN TuEsDAy,4tzzt99, BEG|NN|NG AT 2:00 p.M. tN Tov couNctL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETTNGWLL BE ON TUESDAY , 4120199, BEGINNING AT 7:OO P.M; IN Tov coUNcIL cHAilBERs.
Sign language interpretation available upon req-'u6st-wi-tn?a n6ur notification. please cail 479-2332 voice or 479-2356 TDD for infrcrmation.
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan
Document Summary
Amended llday 12,1999
The following document is summary of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The
summary contains the sections and subsections of the Plan that address the Marriott and Gore
Creek Club development sites. This document is intended to be used when reviewing and
evaluating the applicant's redevelopment proposal for the Marriott for compliance with the
recommendations of the Master Plan.
Since the May 5e Design Review Board meeting staff has attempted to place the comments of
the Board and the Public into the various sections and subsections of the master plan. This
exercise is intended to base all the comments expressed to date in the master plan. While several
of the issues are expressed in Sections 4 and 5 of the Document Summary, the majority of the
cofirments are founded in Section 8, Architectural Design Guidelines.
This summarized document should continue to be used in the review of the proposed
Marriott/Gore Creek Club project.
CHAPTER 2
Introd uction
2,1 Purpose of the Plan
The master plan was initiated by the Town of Vail to encourage redevelopment and new development within
Lionshead. The plan outlines the Town's objectives and goals for the enhancement of Lionshead and proposes
recommendations, incentives, and requirernents for redevelopment and new development. The plan also
recommends specific public improvernent projects that are strategically important to the future success of
Lionshead.
2.3 Policy Objectives
tr Renewal and Redevelopmenl
Lionshead should be renewed and redeveloped to become a warmer, more vibrant envhonment for guests
and residents.
O Vitality and Amenities
We must seize the opportunity to enhance guest and community interaction through expanded and
additional activities and arnenities.
o Stronger Economic Base tbrough Increased Live Beds
Renewal and redevelopment in Lionshead must promote improved occupancy rates and the creation ofnew
live beds.
o Impoved Access and Circulation
The flow of all modes of traffic must be improved within Lionshead.
o ImFovedlnftastructure
The infrastructure of Lionshead (streets, walkways, loading/delivery, snow removal, etc.) and its public and
private services must be upgraded to support redevelopment and revitalization efforts to meet the
expectations of our guests.
Creative Financing for Enhanced Private Profits and Public Revenues
Creative and realistic strategies must be identified so that adequate capital may be raised from all possible
sources to fund desired imurovements.
CHAPTER 3
Existing Conditions Assessment and Problem Idenfification
Introduction
The initial task in the Lionshead master planning process was to conduct a thorough assessment of existing physical
and regulatory conditions in the study area. The goal of this assessment was to identify the problems, opportunities,
and constraints that the master plan recommendations must recognize and address.
3.8.1.3 West Lionshead Circle
West Lionshead Circle (see figure 3-10) functions primarily as the access route to Lionshead Place, several
lodging facilities, and the Vail Associates core site. In addition the road carries a significant arnount of
service and delivery traflic and serves as a transit route for the Town of Vail bus and the Eagle County
resional bus.
Tiansit
There are two Town of Vail transit stops on West Lionshead Circle, the first located in front of the
Maniott and the other at Concert Hall Plaza. According to the traffrc study (see appendix A), only
eight percent ofthe total faffic entering Lionshead - and only two percent ofpassengers on the
Town of Vail bus - used the Concert Hall Plaza stop. The Town of Vail Public Works Department
has recommended that the transit stop at Concert tlall Plaza be discontinued.
b. Service and Delivery
Two service and delivery areas are accessed from West Lionshead Circle, one at the Concert Hall
bus-stop and the other in the alley between Concert Hall Plaza and the Lan&nark Townhomes.
Tbe delivery vehicle staging behind the Landmark Townhomes is ad-hoc and illegal, as this is a
designated emergency vehicle access lane. Both areas occasionally back up and cause trucks to
stage tanporarily on West Lionshead Circle.
c. Pedestrian Trffic
Concert Hall Plaza is intended to be the westem portal into the Lionshead mall, but the pedestrian
paths along West Lionshead Circle are fragmented and the point of entry is unclear, A partial
sidewalk runs along the south side of the sfieet in front of the Marriott but it is not continuous. The
gradient is diffrcult in places, and pavements are often icy in winter. There is no pedestrian
crosswalk at the intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. Dark and
compromised by stairways, the passage through Concert Hall Plaza is seriously deficient as a
pedestrian and retail environment. Very few pedestrians from west Lionshead ever make the
connection tbroueh Concert Hall Plaza to the mall.
CHAPTER 4
Master Plan Recommendations - Overall Study Area
This section ofthe master plan addresses issues that affect Lionshead as a whole. These issues - and
recommendations to address them - should be considered in all planning and policy decisions as Lionshead
redeveloos.
Underlying Physical Framework of Lionshead
The Lionshead resort area (that portion of the sudy area north of Gore Creek) is a mixed-use urban
environment with several discemible land-use sub-areas, or "hubs" (see Map N). Although the hubs
overlap somewhat, there is no consistent and comprehensive pedestrian connection between them. The
primary goal ofthe master plan is to create a visually interesting and functionally efficient pedestrian
environment that connects the hubs to create a cohesive and memorable resort environment.
4.1.4 Resort Lodging Hub
This area of Lionshead is located just west of the Lionshead retail core and is comprised almost exclusively
of high-density residential and lodging products. All future plarming and desip decisions in this area
should work to reinforce the residential nature of the neigbborhood and retain the sense ofprivacy desired
by individual properties. New development in this mea should aim for quieter pedestrian streets, well
defined pedestrian connections, more intensive landscaping and higher qualily streetscape development.
4.3.1.1 View Corridon
Creating and establishing view conidors is an effective way to link the urban core of Lionshead visually to
the natural environment of Gore Creek and the mountain. The master plan is recommending the creation of
several dedicated public ttiew conidors. In addition, all private development and redeveloprnent should
endeavor to create visual connections from and tlrough their properties.
View corridors do not have to be expansive to b€ effective. In many cases, a slender but well targeted view corridor
can bejust as effective as a broad view. Nor do visual connections have to be continuous; they can reoccur,
providing intermittent views from different angles.
4.3.1,2 North-South Orientation 0f Buildings
The predominant east-west orientiation of buildings in Lionshead acts as a visual and physical banier,
intemrpting tbe connection to the natural envtonrnent. It should be a priority in futule development and
redevelopment to orient vertical building masses along a north-south axis whenever possible. This will
help to accomplish the following objectives:
a. Yiews from Existing Buildings
Public input throughout the master planning process indicated that existing property owners in
Lionshead are concemed that new development will block their private views to the mountain. By
orienting new buildings on a north-south axis, the potential visual impact on existing buildings is
reduced.
Open up a light corridor between the existing hotel and the Gore Creek Club to get light back down to the street
and sidewalk.
The ridge lines of the improvements should be lowered and a geater space left between the buildings to
maintain the view to the mountain from the Vail Soa.
4.3.2.1 Landscape end Greenbeh Corridors
Wherever possible the natural landscape ofthe Gore Creek corridor should be allowed to penetrate into the
more urbanized portions of Lionshead (see Map O). This will open up access points to the Gore Creek
corridor, enhance the quality of individual properties, and improve the image of Lionshead as an alpine
resort.
4.5.2.2 Eliminate the Concert Hall Plaza Stop
The existing bus stop at Concert Hall Plaza is underutilized and is too close to the transit stop at the
Maniott. The elimination of the Concert Hall stop will free up space needed to implement a meaningfut
redevelopment of Concert Hall Plaza and create a better westem portal to the Lionshead core.
4,6,4 Modilications to West LioDshead Circle and Lionshead Place
West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place currently handle the heaviest load of lodging access and
delivery traffic in Lionshead and will likely continue to do so. The recommended improvements to these
roads are both aesthetic and functional, working to provide for safe and efficient vehicular traffic while also
insuring a safe pedestrian environment visually consistent with the overall goals of the rnaster plan.
4.7.1 Properties with Direct Service Access
As a general rule, properties that can provide for their own service and delivery needs should comply with
the following guidelines:
a. Loading and delivery facilities should be located deep enough into the property that the
estirnated peak volume of service vehicles does not back up into or block the access road or
pedestrian areas.
b. Service drives and loading docks must be screened with landscaping, fencing, retaining walls
or other appropriate desigrr techniques.
c. All reasonable measures shall be taken to prevent noise and exbaust impacts on adjacent
properties.
d. In no case shall a property utilize the public roadway or pedestrian area to stage service and
delivery vehicles.
4.9 llousing
Recent connnunity surveys and grass-roots planning efforts such as Vail Tomorrow bave identified the lack
of locals housing as the most critical issue facing the Vail community. Early in the Lionshead master
planning process, west Lionshead was identified as an opportunity arca to implement some of the
community's housing goals, particularly relating to employee housing. These opportunities and associated
issues are outlined below.
4.9.3 Policy Based Housing Opportunities
The first means of implementing housing goals in Lionshead is tltrou$t policy based requirernents such as
the employee generation ordinance cunently being pursued by the Vail Town Council. As required by a
future ordinance, all development and redevelopment projects, as a prerequisite to project approval, should
provide housing for emplopes generated and to the extent possible this housing should be located in the
Lionshead area.
4.10 Gateways, Landmarlis, and Portals
The lack of spatial hierarchy or organizational clarity is a fundamental problem in the Lionshead pedestrian
and vehicular network today. This section discusses the need to create a series ofgateways, portals,
lan&narks and useful public spaces that will increase and enbance the character and identity of the
pedestrian environment.
r The site planning of the Gore Creek Club creates a building which is too inclusive and inward facing rezulting
in a lack ofregard for the public spaces around the building and the existing or potential surrounding uses.
i There are opportunities to create a sense of anival at the entrance portals to the property and building.
a The entrances to the property need to be more inviting and less awkward.
o The basic aspects of site p[anning 5us[ as points of arrival, loading/delivery, pedestrian circulation are not
ad&essed in the current proposal.
t More attention needs to be given to the sense of anival at the southeast comer of the property.
4.10,2 Landmarlis
A landmark is a signficant architectural element that all the visitors to Lionshead can identifu and
remember. Landmarks signify important points of entry, turning points and critical intersections in the
pedestrian network, as well as destinations and visual reference points. The single lan&nark in Lionshead
today is the Gondola clock tower, which will be replaced with the Vail Associates core site redevelopment.
Appropriate locations for new landmarks in Lionshead are the east pedestrian portal, the central retail mall
adjacent to the main pedestrian plaza, and the west pedestrian portal adjacent to the intersection ofWest
Lionshead Circle and Lionshead Place. In addition, the potential civic center complex at the east end of the
parking structure should function as a significant architectural landmark for the east end ofLionshead.
t The proposed landmark elements are too big and are not in proportion with the building.
a Are the landmark elements necessarv?
CHAPTER 5
Detailed Plan Recommendations
This section of the Lionshead Master plan examines individual parcels and groups ofparcels wilhin the Lionshead
study area, excluding the residential properties on the south side of Gore Creek. The intent of this chapter -and the
Master plan as a whole - is to identifo important functional relationships and vizual objectives within lhe district and
to propose a frarnework for the long-term redevelopment of Lionshead. The document does not intend to limit or
eliminate ideas relating to specific parcels; any proposals consistent with this framework should be considered even
if they are not anticipated in this document. The parcels addressed here are organized generally from east to west,
starting with the civic hub on the eastem end of the parking structure.
5.4 Gore Creek Corridor
The master plan goals for the Gore Creek corridor are to protect and enhance its natual beauty and
environment, to connect it to the Lionshead core, and to make the Gore Creek recreation path safer and
more inviting as a passive recreation amenity.
a There appears to be no relationship between the existing and proposed building and the Gore Creek strearn
corridor, A relationship should be created.
r Pedesrian circulation has not been addressed; especially along the stream tract.
5.4.5 Revegetation and Lrndscaping West of the Ski Yerd
Slope revegetation and landscaping are needed along the westem portion ofthe Gore Creek recreation path.
This section, which faverses a fill bank above Gore Creek, may never have the forested character of the
section east of the ski yard, but it can be greatly enhanced by planting more rees. The focus should be on
the more barren north side, with less intensive landscaping on the south bank frarning views to the creek
(see figure 6-4). The added landscaping sbould be as natural as possible and appropriate for a riparian
environment. The use of small undersory plantings that would increase maintenance requirements should
be minimized.
5.13 The Marriott
With appoximately 320 rooms, the Marriott is the only supply of hot beds in Lionshead. The single largest
structure in Lionshead, it is also very visible, especially from the west. It is consequently a high priority
renovation project, and all reasonable measures should be taken by the Town ofVail to encouragE and
facilitate its enhancement. Specific issues regarding this property are as follows:
5.13.1 Redevelopment or Development of the Parking Structure
The best opportunity for new development on lhe Marriott property is the existing pa*ing structure (figure
5-17). lf this site is developed, attenlion should be given to the relationship between the development,
Gore Creek, the Gore Creek recreation path, and the west day lot. Vertical development should step back
from the recreation path, and there should be a clear separation (most likely a landscape buffer) between
the public space of the recreation path and the private space of the residential units.
5.13.2 InfillOpportunities
5.13.4
5.13.3
There are several tennis courts on the south side of the Marriott. This area presents an opportunity for low-
rise infill development that eases the visual and physical transition from the existing structue to the Gore
Creek recreation path.
Opportunities for Facade Renovation
Exterior renovation of the Marriott is a community priority, but the size and dimensions of the structue
present a challenge, and it is unlikely that the architectural design guidelines (see chapter 8) can be fully
met. However, this should not discourage exterior renovation, and the Town of Vail Design Review Board
should insure that the ,fltent of the guidelines is met. (This is a basic premise of the architectural desip
guidelines, relevant to all existing buildings in Lionshead.)
West Lionshead Circle in Front of the Marriott
Any future development or redevelopment ofthe Marriott property should include a continuous secondary
pedestrian walk on the south side of West Lionshead Circle. A pavement snowmelt system is strongly
recommended because of icing problems on the walkway in winter.
CHAPTER 6
Site Design Guidelines
Cbapters four and five identified important public spaces and pedestrian conidors that together define the underlying
structure of Lionshead and form essential connections between the disrict's prinary destinations. This chapter on
site design guidelines describes the detailed elernents that lend character and quality to the overall fabric ofpublic
spaces. The master plan envisions a hierarchy of pedestrian spaces and, as outlined in this chapter, demands
increasing attention to detailing in areas where public use will be more intense. Any projects or situations that do not
fall within the framework described below shall conform to tlre exising Town of Vail regulations.
6,4 Secondary Pedestrian Walk
Secondary pedestrian walks (see figure 6-3) are similar to primary pedestrian walks except that they are not
located on primary pedestrian conidors and thus carry a lower volume of pedestrian traffic. The suggested
minimum width for ttrese secondary walks is six feet, although wider walkways may be required where
anticipated pedestrian traffrc volumes are grealer. Poured concrete may be used as a paving material. All
other des.ign parameters thrt apply to primary pedestrian walks also apply here.
CHAPTER 7
Development Statrdards
This section outlines recommended development standards for private property in the Lionshead study area. In
some cases, implementation of these standards will require revision of applicable provisions in the Town of Vail
zoning regulations. Adoption of special provisions for redevelopment of properties that already violate existing
development standards should also be considerd.It is critical to note that all of the following recommended
standards apply e4ual/y as future projects are reviewed for compliance. When one standard is more restrictive than
another, rlat is the standard that shall be the limiting factor. These standards do not represenl entitlements ih any
way. For example, if the GRFA ratio ofa project cannot be met afler the building height, setback, and other
architectural guideline standards have been applied, then that project rs not entitled to the maximum allowable
GRFA. In this case, the quantitative and qualitative standards of the architectural design guidelines would take
precedence over the potential GRFA allocation.
7,1 Landscape Area
The master plan does not recommend modification of this standard for Lionshead. The Town's current
standard, which applies to the majority of sites in Lionshead, requires that at least 20Vo of a prcel be
landscaped. This standard should be flexible for properties along build-m lines and in the Wdestrtan retatl
core area so they may be able to decrease planted area and increase hardscape in order to create the
6
7.2
7.3
7.4
functional pedestrian conidors and spaces outlined in the master plan. This potential reduction of
Iandscape area is not a right ahd should require the approval of the Planning and Environmental
Commission.
Site Coverage
The master plan does not recommend changing this standard. The Town's current standard, which applies
to the majority of sites in Lionshead, prohibits site coverage by structues in excess of 70oZ the area of a
site. This standard should be flexible for properlies along build-to lines and in the pedestrian retail core
areq so lhey may be able to increase site coverage as required to create the functional pedestrian conidors
and spaces outlined in the master plan. This potential increase in site coverage is not a right and should
require the approval of the Planning and Environmental Commission. Below gtade development is not
counted as site coverage.
Setbacks
The master plan does not recommend changing this standard. The current setback requirement on the
majority ofsites in Lionshead is 10 feet from the property line on all sides. This requirement shall be
waived in areas with designated build-to lines, and leeway should be considered in areas of sipificant
hardstrip that otherwise meet the intent of the master plan and do not negatively impact adjacent properties.
Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA)
An important component of the Lionshead Master Plan process was the analysis of GRFA's effectiveness
as a tool for insuring the quality of architecture and the built environment within Lionshead. In short, the
masterplan team found that GRFA was nol effective as a primary means of providing for architectual
quality. Based on this finding it is the conclusion of the master plan team that GRFA siorrld nol be the
primary means of regulating building size. To accomplish this, one of two options must be purzued. First,
GRFA could be eliminated- Secondly, the GRFA ratio could be increased so that it functions as a safety
valve to insure that buildings do not exceed the maximum residential floorplate area that would otherwise
be allowed according to the criteria of the architectural design guidelines. If this second course of action is
pursued, the following recommendations are made:
a. The ratio of Gross Residential Floor Area (GMA) to lot area should be increased m all
properties within Lionshead, excluding the residential properties south of Gore Creek, so that
the site and architectural desip guidelines, not GRFA, are the primary building size and mass
consraint.
b. The method of calculating GRFA should be greatly simplified and changed to include
common space so that basic floor plate area calculations will suffice.
Density @welling Units Per Acre):
The allorvable density ofdeveloprnent in the study area should be increased to provide ample incentive and
create the financial mechanism for redevelopment ofproperties. Additional consideration must be given to
existing properties that currently exceed the density limitations. A model dweloped during the master
planning process showed that an increase ofat least 33%o over existing zoning or exising dwelling units on
a given site would be needed to make redevelopment an attractive option.
In order to encourage the development of live beds or warm beds in Lionshead, the master plan
recommends that accunmodation units, hotel rooms and fractional ownership units not be counted in the
calculation of density. Fwther, because it is a community goal to increase the number of permanent
residents in Lionshead, employee bousing units that are deed restricted for local emplo)€es should not
count toward density.
New Unit Definition
The master plan recommends that the zoning regulations be modified to include "lodge unit" as an
additional definition of a residential unit. This product is defined as a small condominium dwelling unit
with limited kitchen and floor mea. (The floor area usually averages less than 650 sq. ft.) Units of tris
small size are most likely to be in short-term rental pools, with occupancy rates similar to those for hotel
7.5
7.6
roorns. Because an increase in the short-term bed base in Lionshead is a key objective, the planning team
recommends that lodge units count as one{uarter of a normal dwelling unit (i.e. 4lodge units count as one
dwelling unit). Further, it recommends that units of this size in exising propenies be treated as lodge units
for the purpose ofcalculating density.
7.7 Building Height
This standard is ad&essed in the Architectural Desigt Guidelines (see chapter 8).
CHAPTER 8
Architectural Design Guidelines
E.3 Existing Structures
8.3.1 SpecialProvisions
While these Guidelines offer a roadmap for the redevelopment of Lionshead, they are not intended to limit the
efforts of developers and/or designers involved with existing structures. It is understood that many of the buildings
within the community may be unable to comply with some of the criteria described in the ADG. Many existing
buildings, for instance, may already exceed the height criteria identified. Some existing roof pitches within the
community may not meet the numerical values described. And many of the exising pedestrian streets may fall well
short of the "ideal" proportions depicted. These and similar issues will be handled on a case-by+ase basis, with
determination of compliance based upon whether the building meets the general intent of these Guidelines and the
tenets described herein.
Redevelopment Prioritization and "Triggerr"
Consistent with Section 8.3.1 above, existing properties are encouraged to renovate and
rehabilitate, to tbe greatest extent possible, the exterior of their buildings according to the
parameters of the ADG. It is recognized, however, that a single, cornplete, and cofiiprehensive
exterior renovation may not be economically possible for all existing structues, and incremental
improvernents must be allowed. Having said this, the following potential exterior improvements
should be considered as priorities by both private property owners and the Town of Vail. All ,
reasonable efforts to encourage, p,rovide incentives, and facilitate these improvements should be
made.
Renewed and expanded retail frontage. For properties fronting the Lionshead retail
mall and retail pedestrian sneets, the renovation and expansion of the gound floor retail
level is perhaps the most critical element in revitalizing the Lionshead retail core,
Roofs. As outlined in the ADG, the roofscape of Lionshead is a critical component in
"knitting" together the built environment and providing vizual cohesion to the urban
fabric ofLionshead.
Planning considerations. All builrlings in Lionshead, both existing and new
development, should seek to fulfill the roles of landmarks, portals, tuming points, and
other roles as outlined in the Master Plan.
o Form, massing and height criteria.o Building surface treatment- wrlls, doors, windows, signage, etc.. All other components ofthe arthitectural design guidelines.
A critical question regarding the renovation ofexisting structures is v/hen compliance with the
architectual design guidelines is "triggered" or required. Regarding this, the following guidelines
should be considered:
8.3.3
. To the greatest extent possible, renovating properties should endeavor to make significant
and meaningful improvements to their properties as opposed to small, insipificant
improvements. This does not discount the importance of any improvement to a
properties exterior.
. Any single incremental improvement to one building element will not necessarily trigger
compliance on all remaining building elements. However, any portion of the building
being improved should do so according to the parameters of the architectural desip
guidelines, For example, if a property applies to resurface the walls oftheir building, this
resurfacing should be done according to the ADG, but will not in and of itself also
require the replacement of the roof, or another major modification, at the same time.
Any proposal to add significant volume or mass to a property will trigger full and reasonable compliance to the
Master Plan and Architectural Desip Guidelines.
CHAPTER 9
Implementation
The intent of this chapter is to provide guidance to tle Town of Vail as it seeks to implement the recommendations
of this master plan. The recommendations regarding priorities, phasing, and timing are intended to be flexible, not
binding, so that the community can adapt the plan to changing conditions and priorities. The project priorities listed
below are divided into public and private improvements, although many projects will be implemented tbrough joint
public and private financing efforts.
9.1.1,5 Sidewalk and Streetscape Improvements
Enhancements to Lionshead's streets and pedestrian circulation pattems are important both functionally
and visually. Rather than undertaking the major improvements by itself, the Town of Vail is advised to ask
for the financial participation of adjacent properties as they redevelop or expand.
9,1.1.11 Gore Creek Corridor Improvements
knprovements in the Gore Creek corridor will greatly enhance the ability oflocals and guests to experience
the creek but are notvital to the overall functionality of Lionshead. However, these improvements are
stand-alone projects, not contingent on adjacent redevelopment, and thus may be sipificantly easier to
implement, both financially and logistically. Because the creek is a sipificant benefit to Lionshead the
implementation of imp,rovements here should be diligently purzued but not allowed to delay otber, more
critical plans.
9.1.2.1 Individual Property Redevelopment and Exterior Renovations
The improvement of individual properties though redevelopment, site enhancement, and exterior
renovation is critical to the accomplishment of master plan goals. The Town of Vail should create
incentives, encourage, and facilitate these important projects, using the master plan as a framework to guide
renewal and redevelopment projects. The specific recommendations of the plan, including the architectural
design guidelines, are not intended to create a disincentive for redevelopment or exterior renovations. If
any provision ofthe plan proves over time to create a disincentive for desired renewal or redevelopment,
Town Council should consider amending it
Architectural Design Guidelines Checklist
The following chcklist was created to provide a means of evaluating the Maniott Redevelopment
Proposal for compliance with Chapter 8 (architectunl design guidelines) of the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan. The checklist is intended for use with Chapter 8 of the master plan. Staff
has aken the conments of the Design Review Board and the Public and attempted to place the issues of
concem into the various design guideline recommendations of the master plan. Please review this list for
completeness and accuracy. Any discrepancies should be communicated to the staffand/or applicant.
o 8.3.4.3 Door and Window Enhancements
o 8.3.4.4 Building Finishes
r The proposed application of exterior stone makes the building appear to be "dipped" in stone. The height of the
stone around the buildings should varying with massing and building forms in mind.
o 8.4.1.2 Building "Roles" Qnrtals, edge deJiners, landmarks)
I No "sense of arrival to a great place" has been provided.
a The reality of how the buildings will function has not been addressed.
I The landmark element, while large, is in scale given the size and rnass of the existing building.
o 8.4. 1.3 Pedestian Strees (wrZti- to-height re lationships, public/priv ate domain)
I A landscape buffer is needed at the street frontage of the Gore Oeek Club.
o 8.4. 1.4 Transition Spaces (streetfront patios, courtyards, gardens, colonnades, loggias, arcades)
I The space between the commercial use and the main building of the Gore Creek Club is a "no man's land".
Consider connecting the buildings.
o The use of the top ofthe parking structure does not appear to be verywell thought out.
I The commercial space on the north side of the Gore Creek Club is too close to the s[eet and should be moved
back to respect the l0 foot setback.
o 8.4.2.2 Building Form and Massing
r The building elevation along the west property line is too straight and needs to be articulated, both vertically
and horizontally.
r The mass of the roofas proposed and the additional volume it creates is excessive and should be reduced in
scale.o Vail Associates as owner of Lot A to the west of the development site does not object to the proposd west
elevations and building location of the Gore Creek Club.r The spires over the stair and elevator towers are out of portion making the buildings appear top heavy.
o 8.4.2.3 Building HeightQtrimary retail pedestrianfrontages, remaining buildingfrontage, wall
surface criteria, ma,rimum heights, additional requirements/exceplions)
s 8.4.2.4 Exterior Walls (materials, base materials, middle wall materials, colors, trim)
r Address fenestratior! wall surface planes, and exterior building rnaterials ofall the buildings.
t
I Phase II ofthe hotel is intended to become a "flagship" building, yet the proposed exterior building materials
are not of "flagship" quality. The Bavaria Haus is an example of a "flagship' hotel.
t The east and west elevations with the exposed parking structure is unacceptable. These areas need to be
addressed.
o The north elevations of the proposed buildings are attractive.
o 8.4.2.5 Exterior Doors and Wirdows (exterior door sizes, shapes and types, materials and colors,
hardware, window sizes, shapes and types, mateials and colorc)
r The hotel rooms need to extend outward to fill in the void spaces created in the meas on the sloping roof.
a 8.4.2.6 Balconies, Guardrails, and Handrails (location and size, materials and designs)
t The sacking of the decks and windows is too repetitive and does not comply with the intent of the Desip
Guidelines. The proposal makes it too easy to read the gridlines of the building.
o The decks and balconies on the existing hotel need to be aniculated.
s 8.4.2.7 Roofs (dulrezs ional guidelines, pitch, materials and colors, dormers, snowguards, gutters
and dowrrspouts, miscellaneous equipment, skyligh*)
o Why does the height of the building bave to increase to achieve the sloping roof forms?
a Are the sloping roofforms necessary on the existing hotel?
. The application of the sloping roofform sa ths phaqe I building in particular appears phony and contrived
a The steepness oftbe sloping roof creates a wall rather than a roof.
tr 8.4.2.8 Fireplaces and Chimneys (fireplace requirements, chimney sizes and shapes, materials, caps)
o Chimney caps and the portions of the chimneys needs to be examined.
o 8.4.2.9 Detail
i The treatrnent ofexterior details lacks consistency tbroughout the project.
r The quality ofthe exterio finishes are not up to our resort standards.
O OTIIER
I The applicant's options are sisrificantly limited givar the existing conditions and constaints
o The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Architectural Design Guidelines should be study in great detail to
determine compliance of the poposal witl the guidelines.
r The project lacks regard for the adjacent properties.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINAL AGENDA
Wednesday, April 7, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
FttI
cuPy
PROJECT ORIEiITATION / LUNCH - Community D€velopment Department 12:00 pm
IIEMBERSPRESENT IIEMBERSABSENT
Brent Alm
Clark Brittain
Hans Woldrich
BillPierce
SITE VISITS 2O0 Pm
1. Rizk-740 B Sandy Lane2. Yoder-600 VailValley Drive3. Henkes - 2824 Snowberry Drive4. SBC - 1047 Riva Glen5. Herman -343 Beaver Dam Road
Driver: Allison
PUBUC HEARING - TOWN COUNCILCHAMBERS 3:00 pm
1. Sweet Basit - Exterior improvements. Brent
193 E. Gore Creek Drive / A portion of Block 58, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Sweet Basil, represented by Semple Brown Roberts Architects
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND:Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0
CONSENT APPROVED W]TH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That the planter wall must be extended to a height 6" above the limits of the lift at its highest
point.
2. That the lift must be painted charcoal gray.
2. Rizk Residence - Residential addition. Brent
740 B Sandy Lane / Lot 4, Block 2, Potato Patch Filing f2.
Applicant: Oscar Rizk, represented by Larry Deckard
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: BillPierce VOTE:4-0
TABLED UNTTL APRTL 21, 1999
3. Yoder Residence - Residential Addition Brent
600 Vail Valley Drive / Northwoods #D-11
Applicant: Ana Esteve-Yoder represented by Ray Story
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0-1 1-\
(BillPierce recused) Nby'coNsENTAppRovEDAssuBMrrrED ,*ffip
4. Construction of two new primaryisecondary residences. Brent
2239 Chamonix Lane / Lots 1 & 2, Tall Pines Subdivision
Applicant: Kurt Davis & Paintbrush-Tall Pines G.P.
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That a plat amendment is required.2. That once the engineering is approved, the applicant may apply for staff approval.
5. Antler's - Conceptual review of the establishment of Special Development District No. 36.Jetf
680 W. Lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert Levine
CONCEPTUAL- NO VOTE
6. Vail lnterfaith Chapel - Conceptual review of remodeliaddition at existing facility. Jetf
19 Vail Hoad / Lot J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing,
Applicant: Vail Religious Foundation, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
7. Henkes Residence - Gonceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence. Allison
2824 Snowberry Drive I Lol 17, Block g, Intermountain.
Applicant: Andrew Henkes, represented by Steven James Riden
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
8. Herman residence - Final review of an addition/ remodel to a primary residence. Allison
343 Beaver Dam Rd./Lot 1, Block 3, Vail Village 3ro
Applicant: MarkDonaldsonArchitects
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND:HansWoldrich VOTE:4-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 3 GONDITIONS:
1. That any trees removed must be replaced.2. That a condition of Public Works requires that the wetlands issues be dealt with by the Army
Corp of Engineers.3. That a landscape plan be submitted for statf approval.
9. SBC Development-Conceptual review of a new single family residence and EHU. Allison
1047 Riva Glen/Lot 6, Spraddle Creek.
Applicant: Robert Mach
CONCEPTUAL- NO VOTE
10. Fowler residence - Final review of a new single-lamily residence. Allison
1850 S. Frontage Road West / Lot 6, Alpine Creek.
Applicant: Jim and Sharon Fowler, represented by Fritzlen Pierce Smith
MOTION: Clark Brittain SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0 (Bill Pierce recused)
CONSEIT|T APPROVED WITH 4 CONDITIOIIS:
1. That a drainage easement be provided and approved by Public Works.2. That the turnaround be provided.
3. That the garage doors match the existing townhome garages.4. That the landscaping on the north side by approved by staff.
11. The Marriot (Lionshead) - Conceptual review of a major exterior alteration George
and construction of a new interval ownership club.
715 W. Lionshead Circle / Maniot Mark, Morcus Subdivision
Applicant: HMC Corporation, represented by East-West Partners and Gwathmey-Pratt
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 21, 1999.
12. Laidlaw residence - Final review of a new single{amily residence. George
1722Geneva Driv/Lot 10, Matterhorn Village
Applicant: Walt Laidlaw, represented by RKD
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Clark Brittain VOTE:4-0
APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the exterior color be approved by the DRB.
13. Westhaven Gondos - Final review of a proposed new Fractional Fee Club George
and employee housing project.
1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A.
Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby Robinson
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 4-0
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 21, 1999
Staff Aoorovals
Roland residence - Interior conversion. Brent
50210 Main Gore Place #E-?SundialTownhomes.
Applicant: Bernie Roland
Plum residence - Temporary site development sign. Brent
83 Willow Place, Riverhous6 units 6&7/Lbt s, ebir 6, Vail Village 1"t.
Applicant: Roy and Kathy Plum
Olson residence- Interior remodel/modifications to entry door and window/dormer, Brent
1 785 Sunburst Drive/Unplatted.
Applicant: Curtis and Kristen Olson
Dowie residence - Interior conversion with dormer addition. Brent
795 B Potato Patch Drive/lot 26, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch.
Applicant: Robert Dowie
Connelly residence - New hot tub, Brent
1855 B. Sunburst Drive/Lot 6, Vail Valley 3'o Filing.
Applicant: Dennis Connelly
Brown residence - Interior conversion (basement buildout). Brent
5040 Main Gore Place #D-2lSundial Townhomes.
Applicant: Jeff Brown
Van Luven residence - Interior conversion (basement buildout). Brent
5040 Main Gore Place #E-1/SundialTownhomes.
Applicant: William and Barbara Van Luven
Hallenbeck residence-Window & door addition. Brent
1720 Sunburst Drive Unit #331/ail Golf Course Townhomes,
Applicant: George Hallenbeck
Johnson residence - 250 Addition (office and bay window addition). Allison
1 100 HornsilveilLolT, Block 1 , Vail Village 8" .
Applicant: Kinney Johnson
Thompson-Change garage doors. ^. Jeff
45 Forest RoacULot 33, Block 7, Vail Village 1-.
Applicant: Jack Thompson
City Market - Planter/Coffee House alteration Brent
2009 N. Frontage Road WesVA portion of Vail das Schone l"tFiling.
Applicant: City Market
Hinz residence - Revision to previously approved plan. Brent
1460 A Greenhill CourULot 20, Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Pamela Hinz
Hovey residence - Landscaping addition. Brent
1339 Westhaven Circle/Lot 23, Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Nancy Hovey
Davis/Pennington residence - Window addition. Brent
1476 Westhaven Drive, Coldstream #41lOoldstream Condos, Cascade Village.
Applicant: Davis & Pennington, LLC
McDougall residence - Change to approved plans. Brent
2955 Basingdale Blvd./Lot 15, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Tim and Mary McDougall
Raether residence - New in-ground spa. Brent
278 Rockledge Roact/Lot 1 5, Block 7,'Vail Village 1"t Filing.
Applicant: Paul & Wendy Raether
Knobel residence - Temporary site development sign. Brent
392 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Beck & Associates
Slifer Smith & Frampton Vail Associates Real Estate -Temporary business identification sign. Brent
142 E. Meadow Drive/Crossroads East,
Applicant: SSFVARE
Hinz residence - Heated driveway. Brent
1460 A Greenhill CourULot 20 Glen Lyon.
Applicant: Pamela Hinz
Red SanGtone Employee Housing - Window addition Brent
9,$5 Red Sandstone Rd.l Portion olf ParcelA, Block D, Lionsridge 1$.
Applicant: Town of Vail
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
office hours in the proiect planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department,
75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
flLt
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINALAGENDA
Wednesday, March 17, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
PROJECT ORIEIITATION / LUNCH - Gommunlty Development Department 11:30 pm
O Discussion of development of A-Frame site located at Lot 8, Block C, Vail Ri@e
coPy
iIETIIBERS PRESE}IT
Brent Alm
Hans Woldrich
BillPierce
srTE vrsrTs
MEMBERS ABSENT
1:30 pm
1. Hoversten-95 Forest Road2. Antlers - 680 West Lionshead Place3. Marriott-714 Lionshead Circle4. Timber Falls -21469 Timber Falls Gourt5. Tall Pines - 2239 Chamonix Lane6. Bridge Street Building - 281 Bridge Street7. Shaper-2645 Bald Mountain Road
8.Driver: George
PUBLIC HEABING . TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Sonnenalp-Newcanopyon eastsideentryway.
20 Vail Road/Part of Lot K, Block 5-E, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Johannes Faessler
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Bill Pierce
APPBOVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
3:00 pm
Brent
VOTE:3-0
1. That the relief panels on the wall adjacent to the canopy edge shall be painted to match.
2. Cummings residence - Final review of a new single{amily residence
and Tlpe I employee housing unit.
1835 \drest Goie Creex Drive-/ Lot 20, VailVillage West 2nd Filing
Applicantr Greg and Janice Cummings
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:3-0
GONSiENT APPROVED WITH 3 GONDITIONS:
1, That the stonework around the windows next to the south side door be eliminated.2. That the windows be centered on the south side of the garage.
3. That brackets be added to the south side deck.
3, Hoversten residence - Final review of a new primary/secondary residence. Jeff
95 Forest Road / Lot 32, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Philip Hoversten, represented by Snowdon & Hopkins
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
4. Leach residence - Final review of a single{amily residence. Jetf
1390 Buffehr Creek Roacl/Envelope B, Parcel 4, Briar Patch #8.
Applicant: David & Jody Leach, represented by Ron Diehl
MOTION: BillPierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:3-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That the exterior finish materials receive staff approval.2. That a staff approved limits ol disturbance fence be required.
5. Shaper residence-Conceptual review of new garage. .. Jeff
2645 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village 13" .
Applicant: Steve Shaper
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
6. Antler's - Conceptual review of the establishment of Special Development District No. 36.Jeff
680 W. lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVine
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
7. MarriotUGore Creek Club-Conceptual review. George
714 Lionshead Circle / Marriott Mark.
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by East-West Partners
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
8. Meadowbrook Condos - Conceptual review of an exterior remodel. George
1933 Buffehr Creek Road/Lot 41, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant:
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE: 3-0
CONSEITIT APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIO]IS:
1. That the DRB recommends the new deck railing should appear similar to the existing
wood railing.2. That if stone around the base of the building is not an option, an alternate color of stucco
with a relief band at the top be used and that this band be varied/broken in height from
exterior wall to exterior wall.
9. McDonald's -Sign application. George
2111 N. Frontag6 no'dOlt-ot 28, A resub of Lot 2, Vail das Schone 3'd.
Applicant: McDonald's
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Hans Woldrich VOTE:3-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
1. That the sign have a matte finish.
10. Bridge St. Building - Final review/paver replacement and snowmelt system for walkway. Dom
281 Bridge StreeULots D, E, and F, Block 5C, Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Mark Cadmus, Bridge Street Condo Association
MOTION:BillPierce SECOND:HansWoldrich VOTE:3-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 6 CONDITIONS:
1. That they provide an 8" soldier course.2. That inigation be provided to planters and trees.3. That a new light fixture be provided in the planter al the north end on Bridge Street and
that the existing fixture be relocated to the planter on the south end of the property.
4. That the paver color match the blend used at the Austria Haus in a herring bone
configuration.5. That the llue vent detail be approved bystaff.6. That the tree species be worked out with statf.
1 1. Tall Pines - Conceptual review of 2 duplex structures. Dom
2239 Chamonix Lane/Lots 1&2, Tall Pines Subdivision.
Applicant: Paint Brush -Tall Pines G.P., represented by Kurt Davis
TABLED
12. Timber Falls Building #19 - Conceptual review of a new 6-plex. Dom
4469 Timber Falls CourUUnplatted.
Applicant: Greg Amsden
TABLED
13. Glen Lyon Office Building - Conceptual review. Dom
1000 S. Frontage Road WesVLot 54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Otfice Building Partnership, represented by Kurt Segerberg
CONCEPTUAL.NO VOTE
Staff Approvals
Bakalar residence - Minor revision to previously approved plans. Brent
780 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 17, Block 1, VailPotato Patch.
Applicant: John & Christine Bakalar
TOV Community Development Dept. - Remove garage doors and replace with windows. Dominic
111 S. Frontage Road
Applicant: Town of Vail
BrentGolden Peak Ski Base -Window frame addition.
458 Vail Valley Drive/A portion of Tract F, Vail Village 5'n Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates
Tutog - Loft addition. George
22 West Meadow Drive #3024/illa Cortina
Applicant: Robert Tutag
Axelrod residence - New garage addition with storage. Dominic
2578 Arosa Drive/Lot 1, Block C, Vail das Schone #1.
Applicant: Arthur and Judith Axelrod
Bowen residence - Re-siding of 2nd floor of house. Allison
5047 Main Gore Drive/Lot 1, Block 1, Bighorn 5'n.
Applicant: Peter G. Bowen
Jewels of the West-Sign-wall. Jetf
225Wall StreeUBlock C, Vail Village 1"'.
Applicant: Bob Akkad
Goolsbee residence - Deck extension. Brent
1 450 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 23 Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision.
Applicant: Charles&CarolGoolsbee
Higuera residence - Porch enclosure. Brent
1406 Moraine Drive/Lot 3, Dauphiais-Moseley Subdivision.
Dr. Gilbert & Margaret Higuera
Mitchell residence -Addition ol exterior stairs. Brent
1799 Siena Trail/Lot 18, Vail Village West Filing #1.
Applicant: Mr. Mitchell
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular
oflice hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development
Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Greg Moffet
John Schofield
Galen Aasland
Publlc Hearino
-,r;l'r'.'
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
March 8, 1999
Minutes
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Ann Bishop
Brian Doyon
FiLE CCPY
STAFF PRESENT:
Russ Forrest
Dominic Mauriello
George Ruther
Judy Rodriguez
2{D p.m.
Greg Motfet called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
1. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of Special Development
District No. 36 (Antler's) , to allow for a residential expansion of 24 new condominiums,
and 7 new employee housing units, located at 680 W. Lionshead Placei Lot 3, Block 1,
Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVinePlanner: Jeff Hunt
Jeff Hunt gave an overview of the staff memo.
Greg Motfet asked if the applicant had anything to add.
Rob Levine said he was hoping for a final in two weeks and wanted to hear the PEC's concems.
He said the roof element had been changed and rock had been added as this had been an
architectural concern.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. There were no public comments.
Galen Aasland said the 14' parking space was too small for a parking spot.
Greg Motfet said the units were just over enough to require more parking and said that the
project was booked heavily as short-term with weekly turnover.
Galen Aasland said it a parking space was represented as a parking space, it needed to meet
the standards. He said in terms of stacking spaces, you couldn't stack employee spaces in front
of guest spaces. He agreed that the shuttle service had really changed this industry and said
that since the landscaping was close to 20ol", it was ok. He suggested knocking otf the
southeast corner of the swimming pool, as it was dangerous.
Diane Golden said she didn't like the stacked spaces, but suggested stacking employee to
employee, since allowances could be made since they were on the shuttle. She agreed that
landscaping should be 2E/" and also to knock off the comer of the swimming pool.
Tom Weber said the setback was alright, but the applicant needed to come up with an analysis
ol how many parking spaces would be needed since they are on the bus route and don't want to
get into the parking management business. He suggested adding additional landscaping by the
pool to bring up the total landscaping to 207o; possibly adding to the berm on the other side of
the pool.
Planning and Environmental Commbsbn
Minutes
March 8. 1999
o
eastem
o
the TownRob Levine stated that the part ot the property was owned by of Vail.
John Schofield suggested working with the Marrion on the west side, as it was not real attractive.
He suggested going one more level down to address the parking, as he said he disagreed and
thought parking was needed. He said make the spaces work with using a real size space,
otheruise, people end up taking two spaces. He said if the applicant could come up with
numbers showing more parking was not necessary, that would help. He said he would like the
numbers showing loading trucK could fit in the radius as well as a fire truck. He said he agreed
with the others regarding the swimming pool and suggested a joint venture on a pool with the
Maniott.
Greg Moffet said the Marriott was corporately owned and would not be agreeable dealing with an
association. He said the setbacks were fine, but without enough parking you will be creating
problems lor yourselves. He suggested before going to Council, that the applicant come in with'
evidence ralios. He said he liked where the swimming pool was. He said to formalize an
agreement with the Town and encouraged a lease with perhaps the applicant maintaining the
landscaping on the east. He said he agreed with the staff's recommendation on loading.
Galen Aasland said you had significantly less conference rooms than the Mariott, and so the
parking generation was different.
Rob Levine said they don't market their conference facilities for people outside the Antlers.
Architectural Character
Rob Levine oresented a model.
Greg Moffet asked for any public comment. There was no public comment.
Galen Aasland said the entrance was starting to get better, but he said it was unacceptable on
the east and wesl sides and it needed to wrap beter. He said this design perpetuates the
Lionshead look. He said to make changes on the east and west side, and he saw opportunities
to make changes on the roofs. He said he did appreciate the stone on the bonom.
Diane Golden said the entrance was fine, but the decking needs to be made more interesting,
perhaps with some design.
Rob Levine said the railings would be open. He said the owners would like them to remain
pickets as they are now, but that debate was still going on.
Galen Aasland said the applicant was risking monotony and suggested putting glass around the
athletic club. He said this project needed to adcl significant interest on the roof, w1h more
variation.
Rob Levine stated they were concerned about the great variation from the existing building.
Dominic Mauriello said they were using the same room design as the existing building.
Rob Levine staled that these unils needed to stay rentable and it they became more expensive,
they would be less rentable. He said the outdoor balcony made it more rentable. Using the
Austria Haus as an example, he said what they did would not work for what we are trying to do.
Tom Weber said the massing and courtyard are right lhere, but they needed to break up the eave
where it goes into the dormer to break the continuous band. He suggested knee braces at the
decks and he had no opinion on open or closed railing. He said he liked the east elevation better
than the west elevation because it had more glass. He suggested a copper look rather than the
Planning and Environmental Commbsion
Minutes
March 8. 1999
-,
rrn apllitn metal shi ngres.
John Schofield echoed the comments from the other Commissioners, with the addition of heating
the interior driveway because of the shade. He agreed with Galen on the east and west
elevalions, that they needed to get it right and he said that the stone was definitely a step in the
right direction.
Tom Weber suggested vertical wood siding on the upper taller units to break up the north
elevation. He encouraged a study an enclosed walkway.
Greg Motfet agreed with Tom to do some more interesting things with the roof to create more
architectural interest. He suggested talking lo Nancy Sweeney, AIPP, to discuss art and the
interest issue for the balconies
Dominic Mauriello suggested going back to the DRB for a conceptual, before coming back to the
PEC.
Greg Moffet agreed that the DRB would be helpful and take the model as it was, before changes
were made.
2' A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Maniott
Hotel) and a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of the Gore Creek Club
and a remodelto the existing hotel, located at 714 Lionshead Circle / Maniott Mark
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by East-West PartnersPlanner: George Ruther
George Ruther said the PEC was making a recommendation to Council for the major
amenctment, but lhat a final decision would be made on the conditional use permit. He then
gave an overview of the statf memo.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:
Greg Moffet asked for any public comments. There were no public comments.
John Scholield asked the applicant if the proposed percentage of 1/20th shares was open-ended
or part of this approval.
Henry Pratt , oJ Gwathmey Pratt Architects, said that fractional fee clubs were defined as interval
clubs with 1 night or less or a maximum ot 1l1Z .
George Ruther said a maximum or minimum could be placed as a condition on the approval.
Greg Moffet said there could be an amendment to the conditional use permit.
Galen Aasland made a motion to approve the request for a conditional use permit for interval
ownership for the Gore Creek Club Tract A, as detailed in the staff memo.
John Schofield seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
George Ruther gave an overview of the major amendment.
Phnning and Envkonmental Commbsbn
Minul€s
March 8. 1999
o
build toDominic Mauriello said buildings could encroach upon setbacks in a
properties 10', per lhe Lionshead Master Plan.
line or on adjacent
Henry Pratt said a setback would not be more than 7'.
George Ruther said staff thought 7' was reasonable, as long as there was an approved
landscape plan.
Henry Pratt said this project was the same as presented in January at the pre-ap meeting and
they had been working on the designs for over 18 months. He said this met the new design
guidelines in letter and intent. He said he tried to make each of the buildings look ditferent to
reduce the apparent size of the project and there was very little impact on light and shading and
neighbors. He said there were steeply, sloping roofs to bring them more in line with the wtlb.
He said the 56 new time share units had varied roof elements to make it very clear that there
were different from the existing hotel. He stated that the only impact was along the creek and
along Lionshead Circle. He said landscaping was at a minimum level and that they were gening
rid of some of the tennis courts and volleytall courts, but that they still anticipated a permanent
special events tent. He stated that the Marriott was not interested in sharing the pool. He said
they were creating new ehu's in the building where the ski storage was, totaling 10 pillows. He
said that they were running behind schedule right now and that it met the intent of the Lionshead
Master Plan. He explained the rationale for the 30o/o density ratio, because they almost doubted
the required ehu's which were on-site, being in excess of what the Town required. He said the
manager would have a residence on-site and there would be improvements to the existing
loading and delivery. He said they couldn't change the existing building and were proposing a
two-berth loading dock to create 3 usable loading docks and was the best they could do with the
existing hotel. He explained that the new building could accommodate any UPS or other vans
and that there would be no restaurants in the new building. He said that laundry tended lo show
up in smaller vans and lhat trash would be rolled out from inside the building. He said ownership
would make it more complicated, as the hotel would retain their parking. He said Peter Dan was
here from East West Hospitality to explain the loading.
Greg Moffel said we would need to see the easement recorded for any loading management
agreement.
Chuck Madison explained when we go through the platting process, we will go through the legal
access at that time and we were aware that would have to be addressed.
George Buther said thar when a loading truck was parked on the west side ol Lionshead Circle.
staff would need to know that there would be another place to go.
Henry Prail said there were 5 loading berths, which met the minimum requirement. He said they
were proposing to do one wing per off-season, if you want to call it phased or not. He said he
had no problem with Condition #'l , and that regarding Condition f2, they had 6 units or 10 pillows
and.that regarding Condition # 3, they were on the agenda for the April 7th DRB meeling. He
said Conditions #4 & #5 were as discussed and that Condition #6 was not a problem and ttre
Town had asked us to eltend a simple concrete path sidewalk to the west day lot and Condition
#7 allowed us to grade onto VA's site. He mentioned that Condition #8 had roofs overhanging
onlo the sidewalk and there was no problem with Condition #9. He said regarding ConOition #10,
that they should not be required to snowmelt the property in front of the west day tot. He said
regarding Condition #1 1 that the area between the retail and the pedestrian was very tight for
landscaping, but that it could be put by the street. He said the streamwalk in Condition #t2 was
already in and they would negotiate with staff for wildflower seeds as it was in our best interest.
He did have a problem with Condition #13 to upgrade the Frontage Road as the Lionshead
Master Plan was proposing to relocate the road, so this condition didn't make sense. He said
they were spending millions of dollars to upgrade the property and this condition was a
Planning and Environmental Commissbn
M inut€s
March 8. 1999
-wanteddisincentive and so he this conditron removed entirely.
Greg Moffet asked for any public input. There was none.
George Ruther said regarding Condition #5, that the access was needed for the lower level of
the parking structure. He explained that the addition of landscaping was a condition per the
DRB's approval. He explained the unheated section of West Lionshead Circle was for a
pedestrian connection. He said regarding Condition #8, that the area of encroachment might be
an opportunity to exchange some of the existing private land adjacent to the streamtract. He
said there nere some opportunities lor improvements and benefits.
Tom Weber stated that 907" of deliveries were UPS or FedEx for the Gore Creek Club, so he
didn't see much delivery happening and that 10 pillows were good enough. He said he didnt
agree wilh the wording in Condition #13, but he thought developments should pay for impacts, as
it wouldn't make sense for taxpayers to pay lor new development.
John Schofield asked how large the banquet facility was and how often it was used. He said
there was not enough parking for banquets and he was concemed how parking would be
handled when some of the parking went away.
Henry Praft said the hotel had gone to valet parking for all events. He stated that the parking
structure was underutilized and they were not making any changes to how the existing hotel was
operated.
John Schofield said he was comfortable with the height, loading dock and the setbacks on the
west.
Chuck Madison said the garage would be accessed from the top level. He said the two lower
levels would have intemal ramps and a delivery vehicle could go from the alley to the top and
circulate down to the lower levels. He said there would be reciprocal access easements with the
valet.
Galen Aasland said, although impressed with the model he was concemed with the height anct
the parking, as there was a significant deviation from the height. He said he was botheied by
the inconsistency of the amount of deviation lrom the height. He said the applicant hadn't
demonstrated a need for the two towers, so he said he would need to tell me why this is the best
and he would need to sell me on the big masses . He felt the prqect needed sm'aller towers and
also a manager on-site. He said he was fine with the loading, but that banquels had always
feel a problem. He said the applicant would have to demonstrate that this was acceptabla, but
in his mind, he was a little short.
Henry Pratt said, in terms of the height, there was no height restriction on landmark elements.
Dominic Mauriello said there could be llexibility with the height of large buildings in the Lionshead
Master Plan.
George Ruther said the intent of the guidelines was to get a sloping root .
Russ Forrest said each individual area of the Lionshead Master Plans was discussed and this is
a new set of rules.
Chuck Madison said the two landmark elements were trying to break up the box look . He said
they were starting with 85' across, but there was no additional square footage; this was merely
an architectural feature.
Planning and Environmontal Commbsbn
Minutes
March 8. 1999
a
the height, but would love lo see an ehu in the Gore creek
o
obiection with
I
:
Diane Golden had no
Club.
Chuck Madison said we could never find a manager who wanted to live on-site.
Diane Golden asked if the guests were only going to use valet parking.
Chuck Madison stated that was the way it was now.
Greg Motfet stated that if you stayed at a first class hotel, you dealt with a valet. He said he
differed from his fellow commissioners, as he thought the parking was fine. He said a
manager's unit was needed in the Gore Creek Club, because the hotel and Gore Creek Club
were not commonly owned.
Henry Pratt stated that there would be a 24-hr. desk.
Dominic Mauriello said there was no such requirement for a time-share.
Greg Moffet said to deed restrict the easement and record the plat, regarding the loading. He
said that this building was specifically delineated as a special case. He mentioned that there
were real opportunities lor AIPP to integrate functional art pieces here with no greater impact
lhan landscaping. He thought this complied with the code, but would like an on-site ehu in the
Gore Creek Club, the loading/delivery plan be recorded and platted, the building be trimmed back
otf the sidewalks, as set forth in lhe memo, that snowmelting occur in front of lot A only, that
public art be substituted, particularly at the front entrance, and delete Condition #13 and require
this applicant to pay a pro-rate as it relates to the Frontage Road impact.
Russ Forrest said Greg Hall has a ballpark number concerning the Frontage Fload impacts.
Greg Moffet said he would like to see a number prior to Council approval, as it relates to the
Frontage Boad impact. He suggested an additionalcondition to hide the mechanical.
John Scholield said by adding 61 parking spaces, the total would be 355 spaces and 66 rooms to
the Gore Creek Club. He asked what the average occupancy of the hotel was.
Chuck Madison said between 607n70ok approximately.
Peter Dan said managers on-site don't work out, as they didn't want to deal with problems on a
24-hr. basis.
Greg Motfet said all the ehu's were now on the neighbor's property. He understood about
manager burnout, but one is needed on-site.
John Schofield said a 24-hr. desk was not reouired.
Henry Pratt asked to just put in an ehu and not a manager's unit,
Tom Weber said this is about the code and I'm going against it, as an on-site ehu was not
needed.
George Ruther said it would gain acceptance in the community to have this facility.
Henry Pratt said a managefs unit would do away with the number of pillows in Town and the 24
-+rr desk can be made a reouirement.
Planning and Environm6ntal Commissbn
Minutes
March 8. 1999
i
ehu.John Schofield suggested a choice of either a24-hr. desk or an
Greg Motfet asked what kind of assurance could they have if the owner of the land decided they
didn't want to do business anymore.
Chuck Madison said a fixed number of parking spaces could be allocated to the Gore Creek Club
and said they wouldn't be successful if we didnt spell it out up front allocated by cleed to them.
He said the spaces would be allocated to use the top floor (1 per unit) lor the Gore Creek Club
and the hotel would use the lower floors.
Greg Moffet said this still sounds like they are still encountering problems for events.
Henry Pratt said they took the approach that the parking was grandfathered and this was. a new
project. He said fiey had heard nothing from management that parking was a problem. He said
they had to learn how to park that structure and no new spaces can be added to that structure.
John Schofield made a motion for approval in accordance with the findings on page 18 and
Conditions 1,2, 6 with the change that the ehu's be deeded with no less than 10 pillows, with a
24-hr desk or ehu on- site, Conditions f3,#4, #5 with loading in the alley off-slreet, Conditions
#6,#7,,#8,,#9, #10 with the heated snowmelt continuous to the applicant's property and not
further to the west, Condition #11 with landscaping approved by the DRB, Condition #12,,#13
that beiore the tinal reading with the Town Council, the applicant enter into a Frontage Road
agreement and that we recommend to the DRB some other shingle than asphalt.
Tom Weber seconded the motion.
Diane Golden said to amend the motion to include AIPP art in the landscaping.
Greg Motfet said so amended.
George Ruther suggested to include the change to Condition #5 to say recorded and platted.
Henry Pratt said asphalt shingles was an approved material in the Lionshead Master Plan. He
said his shingle was a 40-yr. top-notch shingle, so this restriction was not in accordance with the
Lionshead Master Plan.
John Schofield stated it was a recommendation. not a condition.
George Ruther sgggested amending it to read instead of "prior to the final (2d )reacting, could we
say prior to the 1" reading.
John Schofield said to leave it prior to the 2nd reading see, as there could be changes on the 1$
reading,
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
3. A request lor a final review of a proposed locker room and loading dock expansion to the
Dobson lce Arena, located at 321 E. Uonshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead zno
Filing.
Applicant: VailRecreationDistrictPlanner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL IIARCH 22, 1999
Planning and Environmental Commissbn
Minut€s
March 8. 1999
4. A reguest for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code, to allow {or site coverage in excess ot 20oh,located at 362 Mill Creek
Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pran ArchitectsPlanner: Allison Ochs
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22,1999
5. A request for a variance lrom Section 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to
allow lor an encroachment into the required side setbacks, located at 3003 Bellflower
Drive / Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Mr. Guillermo HuertaPianner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL MAFCH 22, 1999
6. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon), revising
the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road WesULoi
54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt SegerbergPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 26, 1999
Diane Golden made a motion to table the above items.
John Schofield seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
7. Informalion Update
Dominic Mauriello said the ordinance to rezone Lionshead was approved by the Town Council.
Russ Forrest advised that advertising for the PEC and DRB would continue for another 3 weeks
and a new position was being created for DRB, since the PEC rep on the DRB was being
removed.
Three, two-year term PEC vacancies (Greg Moffet, John Schofield and Ann Bishop)
8. Approval ol February 22, 1999 minutes.
Diane Golden, Tom Weber and Galen Aasland had changes.
Diane Golden made a motion to approve the minutes as amended.
John Schofield seconded the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
John Schofield made a motion to adjourn.
Planning and Environmental Commissbn
Minutes
March 8, 1999
t
lr / Tom Weber seconded
t
the motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
The meeting adjoumed at 5:05 p.m.
Planning and Environmental Commissbn
Minutes
March 8. 1999
tt
'*"'':jilj::}:::"#::1"'s'oN FIL t cllp I
Driver: George
KeX
Monday, March 8, 1999
FINAL AGENDA
Proiect Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Communitv Development Deoartment 12dXl p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERSABSENT
Greg Motfet Ann Bishop
John Schofield Brian Doyon
Galen Aasland
Diane Golden
Tom Weber
Site Visits : 1:00 P.m.
1. Antlers-680 W. Lionshead
2.Mafiiol-714 W. Lionshead Circle
3. VRD-321 E. Lionshead Circle
I{OTE: lf the PEC hearing ocends until 6:00 p.m., the board will br€ak for dinner from 6:00 ' 6:30 P.m.
Pudic Hearlno - Town Council Chambers 2O0 p.m.
'1. A request for a worksession to discuss the establishment of Special Development
District No. 36 (Antler's) , to allow for a residential expansion ol 24 new condominiums,
and 7 new employee housing units, located at 680 W. lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1,
Lionshead Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVinePlanner: Jeff Hunt
WORKSESSION-NO VOTE
2. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Maniott
Hotel) and a conditional use permit, to allow for the construction of the Gore Creek Club
and a remodel to the existing hotel, located at 714 Lionshead Circle / Marriott Mark.
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by East-West Partners
Planner: George Ruther
,,.\
/ft(")+t${r,
fllrnlMvan.ltY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:
MOTION: Galen Aasland SECOND: John Schofield VOTE: 5-0
APPROVED
IIAJOR AMENDMENT:
MOTION:JohnSchofield SECOND:TomWeber VOTE:5-0
RECOII|MEND TO TOWN COUNCIL WITH 13 amendedCONDlTlONS (plus 1
rgcommgndation):
1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of Community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit application
for the hotel:a. An Erosion Control and Sedimentation Plan;b. A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;c. A Stormwater Management Plan; andd. A Tratfic Control Plan.
2. That the applicant provide six deed-restricted housing units with no less than 10
pillows, with a 24 - hour desk or manager ehu on-site, which complies with the
Town of Vail Employee Housing requirements (Chapter 12-13), for a minimum of
10 employees, and that said deed-restricted housing be made available for
occupancy, and the deed restrictions recorded with the Eagle County Clerk &
Recorder, prior to requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Gore
Creek Club.
3. That the applicant appear before the Design Review Board for a conceptual
review of the proposed improvements prior to appearing before the Vail Town
Gouncil for consideration of an ordinance amending the Special Development
District and receive final Design Review Board approval of the proposed
improvements, prior to application for a building permit.
4. That the applicant redesign the proposed loading/delivery plan to insure that
service and delivery vehicles do not block or impede pedestrian and vehicle
traffic.
5. That the applicant redesign the proposed plans for the Gore Creek Club to provide
a minimum ol one off-street loading/delivery berth in the alley with the easement
deed-restricted and recorded on the plat so the Gore Creek Club can operate as a
free-standing facility.
6. That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineered drawings of all the
off-site improvements, including improvements to West Lionshead Gircle, the
sidewalk from the common property line with Antler's to the South Frontage Road,
for the required on-site and off-site storm water drainage and management
system, for the pedestrian connection to the streamwalk, for review and approval,
prior to application for a building permit.
7. That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an
approval letter from the owner of Lot A to the west of the Gore Creek Club
development site granting permission to regrade portions of Lot A as depicted on
the proposed plans.
3.
8. That the applicant revise the plans to eliminate any otf-site encroachments of the
building on the Town of Vail right-of-way, prior to an appearance before the
Design Review Board.
9. That the applicant meet with the Town Stafl to prepare a letter of agreement
outlining the requirements of the off-site improvements, prior to first reading of an
ordinance approving the major amendment.
10. That the new sidewalk along the south side of West Lionshead Circle be
snowmelted only contiguous to the applicant s property.
11. That the applicant amend the proposed landscape plan and provide increased
amount of fandscaping, using AIPP opportunities to integrate functional att pieces,
at the front entrance to the Gore Creek Club and the retail shops and that it be
approved by the DBB.
12. That the applicant submit a proposed streambank improvement plan to the
Community Development Department lor review and approval prior to application
lor a building permit.
13. That the applicant submit complete set of plans to the Town of Vail Colorado
Department ol Transportation for review and that before a final reading with the
Town Council, the qplicant enter into a Frontage Road agreement and approval
of a left turn lane otf of the South Frontage Road onto West Lionshead Circle.
The plans shall by approved by CDOT prior to application for a building permit.
Rscommsndation:
That the PEC recommends to the DRB that the applicant use some other shingle
than asphalt.
A request for a final review of a proposed locker room and loading dock expansion to the
Dobsbn be Arena, located at 3d1 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1 , Bloc-k 1 , Vail Lionsh ead 2nd
Filing.
Applicant: VailRecreationDistrictPlanner: George Ruther
TABLED UtilTlL MARCH 22, 1999
A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess ol20o/o,located at 362 Mill Creek
Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant:
Planner:
Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt fuchitects
Allison Ochs
4.
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999
5. A reguest for a variance from Section 12-6D-6 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to
allow for an encroachment into the required side setbacks, located at 3003 Bellflower
Drive / Lot 9, Block 6, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Mr. Guillermo HuertaPlanner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL ilARCH 22, 1999
6. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon), revising
the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S, Frontage Road WesULot
54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Otlice Building Partnership, represented by Kurt SegerbergPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL APRIL 26, 1999
7. Information Update
Three, two-year term PEC vacancies (Greg Moffet, John Schofield and Ann Bishop)
8. Approval of February22, 1999 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular otfice hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpr€taton avaihble upon requet with 24 hour notificatbn. Ploas€ call 479-2356, T€l€Phono for the
Hearing lmpaired, for informatbn.
Gommunity Dwelopment D€partment
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning and Environmental Commission
Department of Community Development
March 8, 1999
4.request lor a final review of a major amendment to special Development
District No. 7, Maniott's Mountain Fiesort at Vail and a ionditional usb permit to
allow for a hotel redevelopment and the construction of the Gore creei ctuo,
located at 714 West Lionshead Circle/Lots 4 & 7, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3d
Filing and Lots C & D, Marcus Subdivision,
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by Gwathmey, pran
& Schultz Architects. p.C.Planner: George Ruther
Executive Summarv
The Comm-unity Development Department is recommending approvat of the appticant's proposat
to amend Special Development Distict #7. Staff's review of the criteria to aniend the Sbeiiat
Development District is outlined and discussed in Section tV of this memorandum. ns itated in
section lv, staff believes that the proposed amendment complies with the development
obiectives of the Town and the Lionshead Redevetopment liaster Plan. Several'concems ofstaff, however, are the adeguacy of the toading and detivery facitities, the need for a left tum lane
on the South Frontage Road and the number of employee housing units being proposed by theapplicant' Careful consideration shoutd be given to these unresolved aspects'of ne ptan'during
the review process.
T.lte Q.o.mmylity Development Department is also recommending approvat ot the requested
Conditional Use Permit to cgnstruct and operate an interval owieriiip ctuO in the High DensityMulti-family Zone District. Staff's review of the critetia and necessary findings can ie founcl iiSection v of this memorandum. As discussed in greater detait in the memorandum, staff'sprimary concerns with th9 proposed Gore Creek dtub are tne ncx or iaijuate toading/detivery
facilities to operate the club as a stand alone facility, the absence of any major streeticape
landscaping at the entrance to the property and the need to pult those fiorti6ns of the bu;Hing on
or over the propeny line back to eliminate any off-site encroachmenfs. Staffls confident thal
tnese r'ssues can be resolved and has recommended that their resolution be conditions of
approval.
A Zoning Analysis is provided in Section tlt of the memorandum. The anatysis provides a
cgmparison of the proposed development standards of the project to the siandards prescribed by
the underlying zone districts and the proposed Lionshead Mixecl tJse Zone District. Staff
believes that the deviations proposed are both reasonable and appropriate as they promote thegoals of the Town ot Vail and the master ptan documents.
Overall, staff believes the proposed redevelopment of the Marrioft and the construction of the
Gore Creek Club will be amenities to the Town of Vait.
rffi)'*)F:€\€ryone\pecvnemos\99Wanion1
L m*H&
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REOUESTS
Th^e applicant, HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by Henry Pratt of Gwathmey, pratt
& Schultz Architects, is proposing a major amendment to Special Development Oistrict N'o. 7.
Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail. The major amendment is intended to facilitate the
redevelopment and remodel ol the existing Maniott Hotel and the construction of the new Gore
Creek Club.
The redevelopment and remodel of the existing Maniott Hotel is intended to compliment the
interior renovations recently compleled in the hotel. The applicant is proposing to,,re-skin" the
exterior of the hotel, convert "windows" restaurant to four condominiums (6,625 sq.ft.) and
convert existing ski storageiretail to Type lll Employee Housing Units. The proposed rerRodel is
intended to bring the existing hotel building into compliance with the design guidelines piescri6ed
by the recently adopted Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan and increase the overill quality
ot the hotel.
The applicant is also rel-t '-esting a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Zoning
Regulations to allow tor 65 interval ownership units in the Gore Creek Club. The new club wilibe' constructed in Phase lll of the-Marriott development area atop the existing parking structure.
The club will be comprised ot 66 lodging-type of units totaling approximateli 79,0d0 souare feet
of GRFA. As an interval ownership club, the 66 units will be soid in 1/Z0th iitervals. ti20'h
intervals guarantees each. owner approximately 17 dap per year in the vail Valley. The
applicant anticipates offering owners the opportunity to exchange their club unit r,riitnin tne
international exchange market.
Other components of the new club include a lull-time front desk lor registration and reservations,
an owner's lounge, a health club & spa facility, on-site laundry services and a 61 parking space
expansion to the existing parking structure. The 61 new spaces are intended to 6ttset t-ne'
increase in parking demand created by the construction of the new club. Approximately 1,912
square feet of retail space will be constructed on the north side of the club iilacent to lvest
Lionshead Circle. A copy of the proposed interval ownership program is anained for reference.
In addition to the improvements to the existing hotel and the construction ol the new club, the
applicant is also proposing site improvements to the property. Proposed site improvements
include the removal of an existing landscape berm on the south side of the property to provide
easy access to the creek and bike path, new landscaping on the south side'of ine fiotei, aredesign of the existing loading and delivery area and the implementation of the recommended ,
streetscape improvements along the south side of west Lionshead circle.
According to the Town of Vail Municipal Code, it shall be the burden ol the applicant todemonstrate that any deviation lrom the development standards of the undeilying zoning providepublic benefits that outweigh the adverse effect of said deviation. The applicairt Fas iOeitiiieA trepublic benefits the community will realize as a result of the redevetopmddt of the Vail Vitragelrin-site. The public benefits identified by the applicant include:
1. An increase in the annual hotel occupancy rate through the redevelopment of an older,existing hotel.
2. A significant increase in the Town's supply of short-term, overnight accommodations to serveour guests and visitors.
F : \everyme\pec Vnemos\99Waniott 1
?t
commercial/retail
i
Lionshead3.
4.
The creation of a space along West Circle.
The implementation of the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan along West Lionshead
Circle.
The construction of a world-class "anchor" hotel providing a high-level of guest service.
The implementation of the objectives stated in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
The construction of employee housing to off-set the demand resulting from the
redevelopment of the hotel project.
A sizeable annual contribution to the Town's sales tax revenue.
The partial elimination of an existing on-street loading and delivery area.
5.
6.
7.
8.
o
II. BACKGROUND
The establishment of Special Development District No.7, the Marriott Vail Mountain Resort, was
approved by Ord]lqnce No. 3, Series of 1976, by the Vail Town Council. The expressed purpose
for establishing SDD No. 7 was to allow for an increase in densily beyond what was othenriie
Regftgd by the underlying zoning of Public Accommodation and High Density Mutti-Famity.
Public benefits realized since the approval of SDD No. 7 have been an increale in short-tdrm
rental units available to visitors of Vail and an increase in summer visitation due to the
construction of a convention facility within the Mariott Vail Mountain Reson.
Special Development District No. 7 has been amended since its establishment in 1976. Themost recent amenclment was in Seplember of 1995. Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1gg5 permitted
the conversion of seventeen dwelling units within the hotel to accommodation units and'required
[1t:! l9ast 2941oarking spaces be provided in the strucrure. A buitding permit was issued'by
the community Development Department and the dwelling units were cbhvertecl and lhe partiing
structure was re-striped to accommodate 294 parking spaces.
The existing Marriott is a mixed use developmenl. The currenl uses on the site include 14dwelling u-nits and approximately 320 hotel rooms, a restaurant and bar, convention and meetingroom facilities and a minimal amount of retail/commercial space.
4ccording to the otficial rgwl.of vail Zoning Map, the applicant's property is zoned SpecialDevelopment District No. 7. The underlyinglonihg tor SDD No. 7 is dotn pubtic Accohmodation
and.High Djnsity_Multi-family. Tract 1 (the parking structure site) is zoned High Density Multi-lamily and rract 2 (the existing hotel) of the sDD is zoned public Accommodition.
Pursuant to the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the Public Accommodation Zone district isintended,
" to provide sites tor lodgEs and residential accommodations for visitors, togethgr
with such public and somi-public facilities and limited professional offices, rieOical
facilities, private recreation, and related visitor oriented uses as may approprietely
be located in the same district. The Pubtic Accommodation District is iirienieO to
-
ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities commensurate with
lodge uses, and to maintain the desirable resort qualities ot the Dastrict by
F \e\€ryone gecvnemos\ggwarnon1
t
establishing appropriate site development standards. Additaonat nonresidentiat uses
are permitted as conditional uses which enhance the nature of Vail as a winter and
summer recreation and vacation community, and where permitted are intended tofunction compatibly with the high density lodging character ot the District. The
Public Accommodation District is intended to provide sites for loclging units at
densities not to exceed twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre."
The High Density Multi-lamily Zone District is intended,
"is intended to provide sites for multiple.family dwellings at densities to a maximum
of twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre, together with such publicand 5s6i-publlc .
tacilities and lodges, private recreation facilities and related visitor-oriented uses as
may appropriately be located in the same district. The High Density Muttipl+Famiiy
District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities
commensurate with high density apartment, condominium and lodge uses, and to
maintain the desirable residential and resort gualities of the District by establishing
appropriate site developmenl standards. certain nonresidential uses are permitted
as conditional uses, which relate to the nature of Vail as a winter and summer
recreation and vacation community and, where permitted, are intended to blend
harmoniously with the residentiat character of the District."
According to Section 12-6H-3, Conditional Uses, time share units shallbe permitted in the High
Density Multi-family Zone District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use perm1 in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of the Zoning Regulalions.
Pursuant to Section 12-16-1 ol the Zoning Regulations, the purpose of a conditional use permit
is,
"ln order to provide the flexibility neoessary to achieve the obiectives of this Tiile,
specified uses are permitted in certain districts subiect to the granting of a
conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics,
conditional uses require revaew and evaluation so that they may be located properly
with respect to the purposes of tnis Title and with respect to their ettects on
surrounding properties, The review process prescribed in this Chapter is intended
to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and
surrounding properties and the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in thevarious districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as theTown may prescribe to ensure that the location and operation of the conditional
uses will be in accordance with development objectives ot the Town and will not be
detrimEntal to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised to
achieve thelie objectives, applications for conditional use permits shail be deniect."
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
The development standards for a.Special Development District shall be proposed by theapplicant. Development standards including lot area, site dimensions, sbtoict<s, height, densitycontrol, site coverage, landscaping and parking and loading shall be determined by tie Town '
Council as part of the approved development tlan, with coisideration of the recommenctations of
F:Everyone\pecvnernos\€9vvlaniottl
A
t
Environme ntal Commission.
ustnct's comptiance with the Revi
staff has evaluated the project for (compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
. In addition, the
The development area is within the overall study area of the Plan which is d'iscussed in detail in
Chapter 4.
Marriott Hotel
The Community Development Department staff has prepared a Zoning Analysis for the Gore
Qreef Club and the proposed remodel to the existind ndtet. tne Zoning Andtysis cornpares the
development standards outline_d by the underlying zoning of Public Accommobation aid High .Density Multi-family to the applicant's proposed major amenOment, The proposed deviatiois :
from the development standards ol the underlying zoning are indicated in BOLD.
Zoning: Public Accommodation
Lot siz€; 3.5 acres or 1 52,666 sq. ft.
D€velopment
Standafd
Underlying Zonlng
of Public Accommodation
1999 Maior SDD
Amendment proposal
Proposed
Lionshead Zoning
Planning and
GRFA:
Dwelling
units per acre:
Site coverage:
Setbacks:
tront:
s|des:
fAAf'
He0ht:
Parking:
Loading:
80% or 122,132 sq. ft.
25 du/acre
55o/" or 83,966 sq. ft.
tn'
20'
_ 20'
48' sloping
per T.O.V. Code S€ction
per T.O.V. Code Section
1 2-1 0-13
89% or 137,147 sq. fL
52 du/acre
55 oA or 83,997 sq. ft.
per the dovelopment
plan
122.83' sloping
294 parking spac€s
thre€ b€rths on-sit€
80o/o ot 122,132 q. ft.
35 duiacr€
70ol" or 106,866 sq. ft.
10'
Avorag€ 71 '
(82.5 max.)
p€r T.O.V. Code Section
per T.O.V. Code Setbn
12-10-13
F : \€veryons\pecVnemos\ggwanion 1
Zoning: High Density Multi-tamily
Lot size:1 .58 acres or 68,86 1 sq.ft.
Development
Standard
GORE CBEEK CLUB
Underlying Zoning
ot High Density Muhi-family
1999 Malor SDD
Amondment proposal
Proposod
Lionshead Zoning
GRFA:
Dwelling
unts per acre:
Site cov€rage:
Setbacks:
tront:
sto€s:
rear:
Height:
PaRing:
Loading:
80o/. or 55,089 sq. ft.
25 dulacre
55ol" or 37,873 sq. ft.
20'
20'
20'
48'sloping
per T.O.V. Code S€ction
per T.O.V. Code Section
1 2-1 0-13
61 parking spaces
no loading/delivery
berths on-sfte
per T.O.V. Code Section
per T.O.V. Code Secuon
1 2-1 0-13
105 % or 72,395 sq. ft 2500/" or 1 72,1 53 sq. ft.
42dulacrc 35 dv/acre .
67%or 46,245sq.ft. 70ol.or49,203 sq.ft.
per the development 10'
plan
71' average Averago 71 '
p€r ths Llonshoad (82.5' max.)
Redevelopment Master Plen
tv.
Chapter 12-9 of the Town.of Vail Municipal Code provides for the amendment of existing Special
Development Districts in the Town ol Vail. According to Section 12-9A-1, the purpose o-f a'
Special Development District is,
'To engourage flexibility and creativity in the development ot land, in order to
Promote ats most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of
the new development within the Town; to tacilitate the adequate and economical
provision ot streets and utilities;to preserve the natural and scenic features of open
space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the V;il
Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan tor a Special Development
District, in conjunction with the properties underlying zone district, shall e;tablish
the requirements lor guiding development and uses of property included in the
Special llevelopment District."
According to Section 12-9A-2, a major amendment to a Special Development District is defined
F:\everyone\pecvnemos\99warion1
6
"Any proposal to change uses; incrsase gross residential floor area; change the
number of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any
approved special devslopment district (other than "minor amendments" as defined
in this Section), except as provided under Sections 12-15.4, "lnterior Conversions.',
or 12-15-5, "Gross Besidential Floor Area (250 ordinance)" of this Title."
The Municipal Code provides a framework for the amendment of an established Special
Development District. According to the Municipal Code, prior to site preparation, Oi.ritOing
construction, or other improvements to land within a Special Develoim6nt District, therd shall be
an approved.development plan for the Special Development District. The apprgved development
plan establishes reguirements regulating development, uses and activity within the speciat . .Development District.
Upon final review of a proposed major amendment of an existing Special Development District, a
report trom the Planning and Environmental commission stating its tindings and'
recommendations and a staff report shall be fonnarded to the Town Counlit, in accordance with
the provisions listed in section 12-16-6 of the Municipal code. The Town council's
consideration of the Special Development District snbtt Oe in accordance with the provisions ofthe Municipal Code and approved by two readings of an ordinance.
An.approved_ developmert plan is the principal document in guiding the development, uses andactivities of the Special Development District. The developmtnt pian shall contain all relevant
material and information necessary to establish the pararieters with which the Special
Development District shall adhere. The development plan may consist of, but ndt be limited to,the.approved site plan, floor. plans, building sections ahd eteva:tions, vicinity ptan, par1ing plan,'
preliminary open space/landscape plan, densities and permitted, conditionil'and iccess-oiy uses.
The determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the planning
and Environmental Commission and Town Council as part of the formal review oi the propose?
development plan. Unless further restricted through the review of the proposed speci'at '
Development District, permitted, conditional and abcessory uses shall 'Oe iimiteO to thosepermifted, conditional and accessory uses in the property'i underlying zone district.
The. Municipal Code prov.ides nine design criteria, which shall be used as the principal criteria in
evaluating the merits of the proposed major amendment to a Special Development'District. lt
shall be the burden ot the applicant to demonstrate that submitial material ano me proposed
development plan comply with each of the following standards, or demonstrate that one or more
of them is not applicable, orthat a practical solution consistent with the publi6 interest has beenachieved. The staff has addressed each of the nine sDD review criterid below:
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment, neighborhood
and adiacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, Ou:tOing height,
buffer zonss, ldgntity, character, visual integrity and -orientation.
The proposed redevelopment of lhe exterior of the Manion Mountain Resort at Vail and
the Gore Creek Club are consistent with the redevelopment objectives oulined in the
recently adopted Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
The exterior building materials of the Marrion Hotel are a mixture ol stone, stucco andwood' The roof material is proposed to be asphalt shingles. Stone will be used around
the base ot the building. The applicant has pr6posed th;t the exterior stucco cotor be an
off-white. Statf believes that the combinatioh oi buitding materials proposed has beenwell incorporated into the design of the Marriott Hotel. -
F : \ev€rlor'ts\pEcvngnos\ggwaniofl l
The exterior building materials of the Gore Creek Club are also a mixture of stone, stucco
and wood. The roof material will be asphalt shingles. The Town of Vail Design Review
Board will have the opportunity to review the building ex-teriors prior to final afproval of
the hotel and new club.
The height of the hotel exceeds the allowable building height of the pubtic
Accommodation Zone District by approximately 75 feet. The development standards tor
the underlying znne district indicate that the maximum height lor buildings with sloping
roofs shall be 48 feet. The height of the existing building is 85 feet. The applicant is -
requesting that the maximum building height for the Marriott Hotel be approximately 123
feet tall, to accommodate the two towers, which are intended to break up the masd oJ the
structure.
The height of the Gore Creek Club exceeds the height limitation prescribed for the High
density Multi-family Zone District. The maximum allowable height per the zoning
regulations is 48 feet. The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of 62.S teet.
The averageieight of the building, as measured along the primary roof forms is less
than 71 feet. The proposed height is consistent with height considerations outlined in the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Staff believes that the proposed height of each
ol the buildings is reasonable and appropriate.
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable
relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
The existing Marriott Hotel and the proposed Gore Creek Club are bordered to the north
by the Vail Spa Condominiums and the Enzian Condominiums, to the south by the Gore
Creek stream conidor and Primary/Secondary Residential development, to th6 west by avacant development site currently used lor surface parking and to the east by the Antlbr's
Condominiums, the Montaneros Condominiums and the commercial spaces in the
Concert Hall Plaza Building.
The applicant is proposing a mixed-use development that is in compliance with the uses
allowed in the underlying zone districts. The underlying zoning of Public Accommodation
and High Density Multi{amily encourages the development of lodges (accommodation
units) and accessory eating, drinking and retail estabiishments.
The interval ownership component of the Gore Creek Club is allowed in the High Density
Multi-family Zone District subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. A comptetil
statf review of the conditional use permit criteria can be found in Section V of this
memorandum. The proposed uses comply with the proposed zoning for Lionshead andthe Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan.
EmDlovee Housino Reouirements
As indicated in a number of the goals and objectives of the Town's Master plans,
providing affordable housing for employees is a critical issue which should be addressed
through the planning.process lor Special Development District proposals. In reviewing
the proposal for employee housing needs, statf relied on the Tdwn of Vail Employee '
Housing Report. This report has been used by the statf in the past to evaluatb e'mptoyee
housing needs. The guidelines contained within the report were used most recentiy iri
the review of the Austria Haus development proposal.
The Employee_Housing.Report, was prepared for the Town by the consulting firm Rosall,
Remmen and Cares. The report provides the recommended ranges of empToyee trouJn'g
units needed based on the type of use and the amount of floor arba dedicaied- to each
F:\everyone\p€cvn6rnos\99\Mario l
i
use. utilizing.the guidelines prescribed in the Employee Housing Report, the staff
analyzed the incremental increase of employees 1'square tootag6 pei use;, that result
from.the_redevelopment. 4 .opy oilhe $lroiesred Emotome
for Vail Exoressed as Emolovees oer 10 .
The figures identitiect in the Housing Report are based on surveys of commercial-use
employrnent needs of the Town of Vail anct other mountain resoh communities. For
comparison purposes, Telluride, Aspen and whistler B.c. all have .employment
generation" ordinances requiring developers to provide atfordable nouding tor apercentage of the "new" employles resulting from commercial developmdnt. "New" ,
employees are defined as the incremental increase in employment ne'eOd resulting.from. .
co.mmercial redevelopment. Each of the communities asses-ses a ditferent perceitage bfaftordable housing a developer must provide for the .new" employees. ror bxample,-
Telluride requires deyglopqr! !o provide housing tor 40o/o (0.4d) o? the .new" empioyees,
Aspen requires that 60%-(0.60) of the'new' employees are provided housing arid '
whistler requires thar 100yo (1.00) ot the ,,new" bmltoyees 6e provided housing by thedeveloper. In comparison, Vail has conservatively det-ermined'that developersihillprovide housing lor 15o/" (0.15) or g0% (0.90) of the "new', emptoyees resritting from
commercial development. whel a project is proposed to exceed- the density ittowed oythe underlying zone district, the 30% (0.30) figure is used in the catcutation. tf a prolecf isproposed at, or below, the density allowed bythe underlying zone district, the 15i" (b.15)
figure is used. The Maniott speciit development distrio haJor amendment proposai
exceeds the density permitted by the unddrlying zone oistriit, and therefore, th'e go%
figure shall be used.
EMPLOYEE HOUSING GENERATION ANALYSIS
The statf analysis below indicates the top, the middle and the bottom of the ranges
recommended by the Town of Vail Employee Housing Report, as well as a statf-
recommended figure which was used in determining ine employee housing needs of theGore creek club. A summary of the Employee Horising eenerition Anatyiis is aslollows:
Bottom of Range Calculations:
Retaiuservice commerciat =1,912 sq. ft. @(5/1000 sq. ft.) = 9.56 emptoyeesa)
b)Multi Family (Club Units) =66 units @(.4/unit)=26.40 employees
35.96 = employees
10.78 = new employees
Middle ot Range Calculations:
Hetail/Service Commercial = 1,912 sq. ft. @(6.5/1000 sq. ft.) = 12.+g employees
Multi Family (Club Units) = 66 units @(.4/unit)= 26.40 employees
Total Employees
(X 0.30 multiplier)
Total Employees
(x 0.30 muttiptieO
a)
b)
= 38.83 employees
= 11.65 new employees
Top of Range Calculations:
a) Retail/Service Commercial = 1,912 sq. ft. @(8/1000 sq. ft.) = 15.30 emptoyees
b) Multi Family (Club Units) = 66 units @(.4/unit)= 26.40 employees
Total Ernployees
(X 0.30 multiplier)
= 41.70 employees
= 12.51 new employees
Stafl Recommended Ranoe Calculations:
The staff believes thailhe Gore Creek Club will create a need tor 36 additional employees.' Oi
the 36 additional employees, at least 1 1(10.78) employees (30%) will need to be provided deed-
restricted housing by the developers of the Maniott. The statf recommended range is based on:
1. the type of retail and commercial use proposed in the commercial space
within the Gore Creek Club;
2. the size of the Gore Creek Club lodging component;
3. the result of research completed by Town of Vail statf ol similar hotel operations in
the Vail Valley.
Retail/Service Commercial = 1,912 sq. ft.
(bottom of range)
Multi Family (Club Units) =66 units
(range does not vary)
@(5/1000 sq. ft.) = 9.56 employees
@(.4/unit)= 26.40 employees
a)
b)
Total
(X 0.30 multiplier)
= 35.96 employees
= 10.78 new employees
'Lodglno has a 9anlcularly latge vanaton ol employees per room, oependrng lpon fac|ols 6uch as sEe ottaciirtygnd levetot og|a|ce/suDoonseMces and amenl|es pro\rded.
Depending upon the size of the employee housing unit provided, it is possible to
have up to two employees per bedroom. For example, a two-bedroom unit in the
size range of 450 - 900 square teet, is possible ol accommodating three to four
employees. These figures are consistent with the requirements lor the Type lll
employee housing units outlined in the Municipal Code.
The applicant has proposed to provide a minimum of six employee housing units.
The units would be deed-restricted as Type lll ehu's and located on the gaiden level
of the Maniott Hotel. Of the six units, four would be one bedroom units and two
would be studio units. The applicant is proposing two employees in each of the one
bedroom units and one employee in each of the studio units. A total of ten
employees would be provided housing.
overall, statf believes that the density and uses proposed by the applicant for the Marriott
and the Gore Creek Club do not conflict with the compatibility, efficiency or workability of
the surrounding uses and/or activities.
10
c.compliance with parking and loading requirements as ouilined in chapter 12-10 of
the Town of Vail Municipat Code.
Parking and loirding requirements for development are established in Chapter j2-10 ot
the Municipal code. The parking and loading requirements are based on ihe square
footage of the uses proposed within a building.
The applicant is proposing a total of three loading/delivery berths. The toadingidetivery
area is existing on the north side of the hotel and has be6n redesigned to accommodate
three trucks. This area can handle trucK up to sOjeet in length. Rdditionally, an on-
street loading and delivery area has been reduced in size to hllp alleviate cohfllcts witn
cars and buses. The on-street space is intended only for temporary, shon-term parking
shoufd the three on site spaces be occupied. Anothdr loading/delivery arca is tobateO 6n
the west side ol the hotel between the hotel and the Gore creek club: This area is
intended only lor use of the conference space inside the hotel. lt is not designed to
accommodate deliveries to the hotel. No loading/delivery area has been provided for the
use of the Gore Creek Club.
The statf has reviewed the proposed loading/delivery plan. Upon review ot the plan we
believe the proposal does not meet the minimum stdnbarcts ldr loading/deliveryior the
hotel and the new club. While we understand that the applicant is limitect by tlie existing
configuration and layout ot the hotel, we believe it is neiessary lor the loadihgidelivery -
situation to be resolved with this redevelopment proposal. Ac6ording to the
loading/delivery standards outlined in the Municiial bode, a minimuir ot five berths are
required. At a minimum, loading/delivery needs to be provided in a realistic manner for
the Gore Creek Club. Should the Gore Creek Club ever become a stand alone buitding
from the Marriott, minimum standards would not be met.
conformity with the applicable elements of the vail comprehensive plan, Town
policies and Urban Design plan.
Vail land Use Plan
The goals contained in the vail Land Use plan are to be used as lhe Town's policy
guidelines during the review process for a major amendment to an existing sieciai
development district. staff has reviewed the Vait Land Use plan and belieiei the
following policies are relevant to the review of this proposal:
1. GenoralGrowth/Development
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve
both the visitor and the permanent resident.
1.2 The quality of the environment including air, water, and other narural
resources should be protected as the Town grows.
1'3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgrade whenever
possible.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additionat growth in existing
developed areas (infiil).
D.
11
3. Commercial
3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more etficiently.
3.2 The Village and Lionshead are the best location for hotels to serve the
future needs of the destination skier.
3.3 Hotels are important to the continued success of the Town of Vail,
therefore conversion to condominiums should be discouraged.
3.4 Commercial growth should be concentrated in existing commercial areas
to accommodate both local and visitor needs.
4. Villaqe Core/Lionshead
4.1 Future commercial development should continue to occur primarily in
existing commercial areas. Future commercial development in the Core
areas needs to be carefully controlled to facilitate access and delivery.
4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing
character of each area is preserved through the implementation of the
Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master plan.
5. Residential
5.1 Quality timeshare units should be accommodated to help keep occupancy
rates up.
5.2 Atfordable employee housing should be made available through private
etforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town oi Vait, witn
appropriate restrictions.
The Vail Land Use Plan projects a need for additional lodging units in the Town of Vail.
while lhe statistical information used to prqect need is most likely, outdated, staff
believes there continues to be a need for additional lodging units in the Town of Vail. The
Plan projected a need for a total ol 395 additional lodging units by the year 2000. The
Plan further suggests that increased density for commercial, residentidt and lodging uses
in the village/Lionshead core areas would be acceptable so long as the existing
character of each area is being preserved.
statf believes the proposed major amendment of special Development District (#7) is in
concert with the goals and policies of the vail Land Use plan as outlined above.
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan
The Lionshead Fledevelopment Master plan was adopted by the vail rown council in
December of 1998. The purpose of the plan is to encourage redevelopment and new
development initiatives within the Lionshead area. The plan outlines the goals and
objectives for the enhancement of Lionshead and proposes recommendaiions, incentives
and requirements for redevelopment and new development.
L2
t
chapter Four of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master plan identilies issues and
provides recommendations that need to be considered in all planning and policy decisions
as Lionshead redevelops.
The applicant's properties are located in what is identified in the ptan as the Resort
Lodging Hub. This area is located just west of the Lionshead Commercial Core and is
comprised of mostly high-density residential development. All future plans and proposals
should work to reinforce the residential character of the area. New develooment shbuE
aim for quieter pedestrian streets, well-defined pedestrian connections and more
intensive landscaping and higher quality streetscape development.
The plan further suggests that new development be constructed on a north-south .
orientation to improve physical, visual and sun access to the buildings and the streets
below.
The plan proposes improvements to the intersection of west Lionshead circle and
Lionshead Place. Currently, this intersection handles heavy loads of traffic lor lodging
and service deliveries. The plan suggests the elimination of on-street loading and
delivery and an improved pedestrian area at the intersection. To this end, the plan
recommends that loading and delivery areas be deep enough into the building or property
to prevent delivery truclG from blocking vehicle or pedestrian traffic. The ptan turtnei
recommends that these areas be landscaped and/or screened to improve the aesthetic
quality ol the streetscape. ln no case, however, shall a property utilize the public roadway
or pedestrian area to stage service and delivery vehicles.
Lastly, in chapter Four, the plan encourages the creation of landmark features in
Lionshead. A landmark feature is a significant architectural element that all visitors to
Lionshead can identily and remember. Landmarks signily important points of entry,
critical intersections in the pedestrian network, as well asdestinationb and visual -
reference points. Appropriate locations for landmark features are the east pedestrian
portal, the central retail mall area and the west pedestrian portal in the vicinity of the
intersection of West Lionshead Circle and Lionshead place.
Chapter Five of the plan provides detailed recommendations based upon the examination
of individual parcels of land in the Lionshead area. The intent of the examination is to
identify important objectives for redevelopment of specific parcels in Lionshead. The
recommendations for the Marriott property are listed below:
5.13 The Marriott
with approximately 320 rooms, the Marriott is the only supply of hot beds in Lionshead.
The single largest structure in Lionshead, it is also very vislOle, especially trom the west.
It is consequently a high priority renovation project, and all reasonable m-easures should
be taken by the Town of Vail to encourage and facilitate its enhancement. specific
issues regarding this property are as follows:
5.13.1 Redevelopment or Development ot thg parking Structure
The best opportunity for new development on the Marriott property is the existing
parking structure (figure 5-17). tf this site is developed, aneniion 3houtd be given
to the relationship between the development, Gore Creek, the Gore Creek -
recreation path, and the west day lot. Vertical development should step back lrom
13
the recreation path, and there should be a clear separation (most likely a
landscape butfer) between the public space of the recreation path and the private
space of the residential units.
5.13.2 Inflll Opportunities
There are several tennis courts on the south side of the Marriott. This area
presents an opportunity for low-rise infill development that eases the visual and
physical transition from the existing structure to the Gore Creek recreation path.
5.13.3 Opportunities for Fagade Renovation
Exterior renovation of the Marriott is a community priority, but the size and
dimensions of the structure present a challenge, and it is unlikely that the
architectural design guidelines (see chapter 8) can be fully met. However, this
should not discourage exterior renovation, and the Town of Vail Design Review
Board should insure that the intent of the guidelines is met. (This is a basic
premise of the architectural design guidelines, relevant to all existing buildings in
Lionshead).
5.13.4 West Uonshead Circle in Front of the llarriott
Any future development or redevelopment of the Maniott property should include
a continuous secondary pedestrian walk on the south side of west Lionshead
Circle. A pavement.snowmelt system is strongly recommended because of icing
problems on the walkway in winter.
Chapter Eight of the plan prescribes the architectural design guidelines for redevelopment
and new development in Lionshead. The intent of the guidelines is to direct the growtn ot
the community through distinct levels ol perception, from views of the neighborh6od from
the mountain and highway, to perceptions within its pedestrian streets, tolhe detail level
of artistry and ornamentation on the structures themselves. Staff believes that it is most
appropriate for the Town of Vail Design Review Board to review the plan for compliance
with Chapter Eight of the plan.
Overall, staff believes that the applicant'sproposal complies with the various provisions
of the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. The proposal addresses landicape
improvements, exterior fagade improvements to the existing hotel, pedestrian
improvements both to and from the street, lodging improvements utilizing infill
development and the creation of a landmark feature to help identify the western portal to
Lionshead. The applicant has also proposed to enhance the pedestrian experieirce at the
intersection of west Lionshead circle and Lionshead place by proposing niw activitygenerating commercial uses on the corner. lf there is an area where stiff believes tire
applicant's progo.sll may fail to comply with the plan, it is in the design and operation of
the loading and delivery area. Staff believes that the loading and delivery area should be
redesigned to insure an adequate number of berths to accommodate service and delivery
vehicles to prevent loading and delivery from the public right of way and to insure that tn6
berths are adequately designed to prevent service and delivery vehicles from impeding
traffic flows. Additionally, at a minimum, loading and deliverylacilities should b6
designed into the Gore Creek Club so that the club can operite as a stand alone building
should il ever need to be.
1i
E.
F.
ldentltlcation and mitigation of naturat and/or geotogic hazards that attect the
property on which the special development district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards that effect the applicant's property.
slte plan, building design and tocation and open space provisions desagned to
produce a tunctional dsvelopment responsive and sensitive to netural features,
vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
The. appligant has proposed to deviate from the setbacks prescribed.by the undeilying
zoning. The underlying zoning prescribes 20-foot setbacks at the erteiior lot lines. The ,
applicant is proposing a seven foot setback from the west property, zero.setbacks at the
ground level on the east and north property lines, and more than S0 feet from the
centerline of Gore Creek. The proposed setbacks allow for a minimal landscape butfer to
be planted around the perimeter of the Gore Creek Club. The setbacks for the existing
hotel remain unchanged. The applicant has maintained a 20 foot building separation
between the buildings on the interior of the development. The building s-etbacks allow for
the required building separation and provide adequate pedestrian-traffic circulation. The
proposed zoning for Lionshead and the master plan requires a 1O foot setback along the
west property line.
The. applicant is proposing to exchange two portions of rown of Vail right of way for
additional stream tract area. The areas in question are at the front entrance to ihe Gore
Creek Club and at the eastern end of the Marriott hotel. The exchange of land would be
on a.square loot-to-square foot basis. The applicant believes that the exchange would
result in a winiwin situation for both the Town and the property owner.
The applicant has submitted a detailed sun/shade analysis. The purpose of the analysis
is to illustrate the impacts of the redevelopment of the existing hotel and the construction
of the new club the public right-of-way and adjacent propertiea. while the increased
building heights will increase lhe amount of shading on the areas to the north of the
development site, statf believes the increases are minimal and will not have any ndgative
impacts on existing or future development. A copy of the sun/shade analysis hls been
attached for relerence,
A circulation system designed tor both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and
off .site traff ic circulation.
slaff believes that the proposal complies with the circulation system criteria described
above. The applicant has worked closely with the Town Engirieer to design a circulation
system that is both functional and efficient. As stated previously, with the exception of
the front entry drop-otf spaces under the porte cochere, all of th-e parking will b6 in an
underground structure. The applicant will also provide a much needed sidewalk
along the south side of West Lionshead Circle connecting the pedestrian traffic to the
south. Frontage Road. The proposed vehicle and pedestiian tiatfic circulation plan
complies with the recommendation outlined in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master
Plan.
G.
t-5
H. Functionaland aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and
preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
The applicant is proposing to implement landscape improvements around the existing
hotel and around the new club. As part of the improvements, the appllcant will be
providing a pedestrian connection from the hotel and club down to the streamwalk. Statf
would recommend that the applicant increase the landscaping and enhance the
streetscape at the entrance to the new club. No landscaping is currently proposed in this
area.
The staff would suggest that the final landscape plan be reviewed and approved by rhe
Town of Vail Design Review Board.
l. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, lunctional and
efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development
district.
Phasing of development is not proposed. The applicant is required to submit a
construction phasing.and staging plan to the Town prior to receiving a buibing permit.
The plan will be used to ensure an efficient and workable relationshlp with suirdunding
uses during the redevelopment of the hotel and the construction of the club.
V CRITERIA AND FINDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The following criteria are to be used by the Planning & Environmental Commission to
when evaluating a request for a conditional use permit.
1. Relationship and impact ot the use on the development objectives of the Town.
The applicanfs property is located in an area identified as the Resort Lodging Hub of
Lionshead. This area is characterized by residential and lodging-type of d-evetopment
intended to provide accommodations for our guests, residents and visitors. A ldng
standing goal of Vail as a resort community is to maintain and enhance the short-i-erm
overnight accommodations. A substantial hotel bedbase is critical to the continued
success of our resort market.
There are many me_ans of maintaining and enhancing the short-term overnight
accommodations. The obvious is to build strictly hotel rooms. A second means is
timeshare and other forms of interval ownership.
The possible benefits of timeshare include:
r Increased activity during shoulder seasonsI The attraction of revenue generating touristso Efficient utilization of resourceso Pride ownership and buy-in to the communityo Increased levels of occupancyr Increased resort exposure due to the extensive number of interval ownersr Fleduced cost of property ownership in a resort community
Ib
3.
overall, staff believes that the applicant's proposal to conslruct G6 1/20tn intervat
ownership units in the Gore Creek Club is positive. lnterval ownership units and the use
thereot are compatible with existing and surrounding uses. Staft does not believe that the
proposed conditional use will not have any negative impacts on the character of the area.
The effsct of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation
facllities, ulllities, schools, parks and recreation tacilities and other public facility
needs.
Staff does not believe that the request to construct and operate an interval ownership
c|ubwi||haveanynegativeimpactsontheabovedescribedcriteriaoverstrict|y
accommodation units. With increased occupancy comes possible increased u-sd of our
public faqilities, such as the bus system, streamwalk, bike paths, etc. staff does not
believe, however, that the increased use will be detrimentdl.
Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and
pedestrian satety and convenience, tratfic flow and control, access,
maneuverability, and snow removal from the street and parking area.
similar to the criteria #2, staff does not believe that the proposed use will have any
negative impacts on the above described criteria.
A' Necessary Findings:The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make
the following lindings betore granting a conditional use permit:
1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the
purposes 0f this Title and the purposes of the district in which the site
is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it
ffiili,'s"?ff :l':fl :;Jsl??tffi i#iililffi *"Jlff t"3:liJ:?t,',,.
improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use wilt comply with each of the applicable
provisions of this Title.
VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Major Amendmsnt
The Community Development Department recommends approval ot the applicant's request for a
major amendment to Special Development District #7, Manioft, to allow for iedevelopmbnt of the
existing hotel and the new construction of the Gore creek club. staff's recommendition for
approval is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section lV of this memorandum. The
statf believes that the proposal generally complies with the nine design criteria, as identified in
this memorandum.
T7
Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval of the
requested major amendmenl to the Vail Town council, staff would recommend that the
Commission make the following finding:
That the proposed major amendment to Special Development District #7, Maniott, complies with
the nine design criteria outlined in Section 12-9A-g of the Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Additionally, the applicant has demonstrated to the satislaction of the Commission that any
adverse effects of the reguested deviation from the development standards of the undertying
zoning are outweighed by the public benefits provided.
ConditionalUse Permit
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the applicant's request for a
conditional use permit to allow for the operation ol the Gore Creek Club. Staff's recommendation
is based upon the review of the criteria outlined in section v of this memorandum.
should the Planning & Environmental commission choose to approve the request for a
conditional use permit to allow for the construction and operation of a interval ownership club,
staff would recommend that the following finding be made:
That the construction and operation of the 66 inteMal ownership units in the Gore Creek Club
adheres to the purpose statements of the High Density Mufti-family Zone District and of a
conditional use permit as stated in the Town of vail Municipal code, Additionaily, the
construction and operation of the Gore Creek Club will not be detrimental to the pubtic health,
safety, or welfare, nor will it be materially injurious to the to the properties or improvements in the
vicinity of the Club.
Should the Planning & Environmental Commission choose to recommend approval of the
requested major amendment and the conditional use permit, staff would recommend that the
approval carry with it the following conditions:
1. That the applicant submit the following plans to the Department of community
Development, for review and approval, as a part of the building permit applicition for the
hotel:
An Erosion Control and Sedimentation plan;
A Construction Staging and Phasing Plan;
A Stormwater Management Plan; and
A Traffic Control Plan.
2. That the applicant provide deed-restricted housing, which complies with the Town of Vail
Employee Housing requirements (chapter 1z-'tgl,lor a minimum of '10 employees, andthat said deed-restricted housing be made available for occupancy, and thd d6ed
restrictions recorded with^the Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, pridr to requesting aTemporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Gore Creek Club.
3' That the applicant appear before the Design Review Board tor a conceptual review of theproposed improvements prior to appearing before the Vail Town Council for consideration
of an ordinance amending the Special Development District and receive final Design
Review Board approval of the proposed improvements, prior to application tor a OriilOing
oermit.
a.
o.
IU
4.
c.
6.
That the applicant redesign the proposed loading/delivery plan to insure that service and
delivery vehicles do not block or impede pedestrian and vehicle tratfic.
That the applicant redesign the proposed plans for the Gore creek ctub to provide a
minimum of one off-street loadingidelivery berth so the Gore Creek Club can operare as a
free-standing facility.
That the applicant submit a complete set of civil engineered drawings ot all the otf-site
improvements, including improvements to west Lionshead circle, tFe sidewalk from the
comm-on property line with Antler's to the South Frontage Road, for the required on-site
and off-site storm water drainage and management syslem, for the pedestiian connection '
to the streamwalk, lor review and approval, prior to aiplication for.a'building permit.
That the applicant submit to the Community Development Department an approval lener
from the owner of Lor A to the west of the Gore cre-ex ctub dbvetopment siid granting
permission to regrade portions of Lot A as depicted on the proposed plans.
That the applicant revise the plans to eliminate any off-site encroachments of the building
on the Town of Vail right-of-way, prior to an appeaiance before the Design Review Board-.
That.the applicant meet with the Town Statf to prepare a lener of agreement outlining thereguirements of the otf-site improvements, prioi to'lirst reading of a-n ordinance appr6ving
the major amendment.
That the new sidewalk along the south side ol West Lionshead Circle be snowmelted.
That the applicant amend the proposed landscape plan and provide increased amount oflandscaping at the front entrance to the Gore creek club and the retail shops.
That the appliqant submit a proposed streambank improvement plan to the communityDevelopment Department for review and approval prior to applichtion for a buiHingpermit.
That the applicant submit complete set of plans to the Town of Vail Colorado Department
ot rransportation for review and approval bt a teft turn lane off of the soum Froniage
-
Road onto west Lionshead circle. The plans shall by approved by cDoi prior to
application for a building permit.
7.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
19
it'Ih i
aevS)iq) ''wt.'
rll 39VN* - gn-, >33>1, 3uO9
.L:JO9:Ial NIV-LN0Oh IIOI:JEVI^I .]lVA
'lW1il"-l
-
lit -i
2
Els-
$$
$t8u
{
i,g
*6 +"
$$i$
=liotl
trtl
Ftrot:{tiluti
t
tui'hl. ,"t,riltr;5;#:triT#l.ffiiii; i :ii i
..$8S.' o
1z- $tao ..)$i 5n
$$i$
-lr-li
sti
<ti.l-Lll
Alol
*lr
ntl
Fliotitu<ll
atllutlotloti
tLti
Pli
E
5
d
R
I
tr
$
+
$
&
g
E
g
E
t t
-L:JO5=:J N
r{-
$$3ig$1n So
Hi$$F
:F39t
3
M
93$.
513#
iiH
t
coMMrssroN
t
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE
Monday, February 22, 1999
FINAL AGENDA
Driver: George
KEX
FILE r'rlP:r
Proigct Orientation / PEC LUNCH - Communitv Develooment D'epartment 12:00 p.m.
MEMBEHS PRESENT MEMBERSABSENT
Greg Moflet
John Schofield
Galen Aasland
Diane Golden
Ann Bishop
Brian Doyon
Tom Weber
Site Visits :
1. Forbes - 362 Mill Creek Circle2. Lionshead Miniature Golf Course -Tract B&D
1:15 p.m.
NOTE: lf the PEC h€aring e)dends until 6:00 p.m., the board will break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.
Public Hearino - Town Council Chambers 2dr0 p.m.
1. A request for a renewal of (and an amendment to) an existing conditional use permit at
the Lionshead Miniature Golf Course, located at a portion of Tract B & D, Vail Lionshead
1s Filing.
Applicant: Charlie AlexanderPlanner: Jeff Hunt
MOTION: John Schofield SECOND: Diane Golden VOTE:7-0
APPROVED W]TH 3 GONDITIONS:
1. The goll course and climbing wall will be operated in accordance with the descriptions
contained in this memo.
2. The climbing wall will be setback a minimum of 30' from any bike/ped bath.
3. The bed of the trailer shall face south with the three climbing surfaces to the west,
north and east. This trailer shall be screened by vegetation or other devices subject
to Design Review Board approval
6-.tBil
wttotutilly
2. A request for a variance from Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail
Municipal Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20Y" and a variance from Section
12-6D-6 (Front Setbacks) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an
encroachment into the front setback on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot,
located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt ArchitectsPlanner: Allison Ochs
MOTION:Ann Bishop SECOND:John Schofield VOTE:6-0 (Brian Doyon
recused)
TABLED
3. A request for a worksession to discuss an amendment to the Town's "Public
Accommodation" Zone District, Chapter 7 and amendments to Chapter 15, Gross
Residential Floor Area (GRFA), Town of Vail Municipal Code.
Applicant: Johannes Faessler, represented by Braun Associates, Inc.Planner: George Ruther
woRKsEssroN-No voTE
4. A request for the establishment of new zone districts entitled Lionshead Mixed Use 1
District and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District (Title 12, Zoning), in order to implement the
Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan. Other modifications are being made to other
sections of Title 1 2, namely, chapter 4 Districts Established, chapter 10 off-street
Parking and Loading, Chapter 13 Employee Housing, Chapter 14 Supplemental
Regulations, and Chapter 15 Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA). Additionally Title 11
Sign Regulations and Title 5 Public Health and Safety are being modified.
Applicant: Town ol VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION:Galen Aasland SECOND: Ann Bishop VOTE:7-0
RECOMilENDED APPROVAL O-0) W|TH MODTFTCATIONS:
(A copy of the memo will be provided at the scheduled March 3, 1999 Town Council
meeting).
5. A request for a rezoning of property located in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan
Area, in accordance with the attached map to a new zone district entitled Lionshead
Mixed Use District 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use District 2 District, (including, Vail
International, Lodge at Lionshead-Phases l-lll, Tree Tops, Lionshead Center, Lionshead
Arcade, Vail 21, Lion's Pride Building, Vantage Point, Lifthouse Condominiums,
Westwinds, Sunbird Lodge, Gondola Building, Landmark Condominiums, Landmark
Townhomes, North Day Lot, Lionsquare Lodge, Lionsquare North, Montaneros, Concert
Hall Plaza, Antlers, Marriott, Enzian, Vail Glo Lodge, Lionshead Inn, Vail Spa, West Day
Lot, VA Maintenance Yard and the Amoco Station) and a rezoning of the Lionshead
parking structure from Parking District to General Use .
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
MOTION:John Schofield SECOND:Ann Bishop VOTE: 7-0
RECOMIIENDED APPROVAL
6. A request for the establishment of Special Development District No. 36, to allow for a
commercial expansion, located at 680 W. Lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead
Third Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVinePlanner: Jeff Hunt
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 8, 1999
7. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Marriott
Hotel), to allow for the construction of the Gore Creek Club and a remodel to the existing
hotel, located at 714 Lionshead Circle / Maniott Mark.
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., represented by East-West Partners
Planner: George Ruther
TAELED UNTIL MARCH 8,1999
8. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 4 (Glen Lyon), revising
the Glen Lyon Otfice Buibing site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage Road WesULot
54, Glen Lyon Subdivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt SegerbergPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 8, 1999
9. A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion to the Dobson lce
Arena, located at 321 e. uonshdad Circle/Lot 1, Block 1,'Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing.
Applicant: VailRecreationDistrictPlanner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 8, 1999
10. A request for a minor amendment to Special Development District No. 35, Austria Haus,
to amend Section 6 of Ordinance #12, Series of 1 997 to clarify a condition of the
Ordinance, located at242E. Meadow Drivei Part of Tract C, btock 5D, Vail Village 1$
Filing.
Applicant: Bill Sullivan, representing the Austria Haus Development Group
Planner: George Ruther
TABLED UNTIL MARCH 22, 1999
11. Information Update
Three, two-year term PEC vacancies (Greg Moffet, John Schofield and Ann Bishop)
12. Approval of January 25, 1999 minutes.
The applications and information about the proposals are available lor public inspection during
regular otfice hours in the project planner's otfice located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation avaihbb upon requct with 24 hour notiticatbn. Please call 479-2356, Telephone for the
Hearing lmpaired, for intormation.
communN Dq/elooment D€oanment 3
December 2, 1998
February 7, 1999 (revised)
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail- major amendment to SDD
George:
Subsequent to our pre-application meeting on 1O/1 9/98, before making a formal application
and accordance with the new policy. we would like to schedule a joinimeeting with the
PEC. Town council and possibly even the DRB as early in January 1999 as possible. Asrequested, here is a synopsis of what exists at the hotel and what is being proposed.
subsequent to our pre-application hearing on January | 2, I ggg, the project remains aspresented except that the location and number of EHU,s has been revised.
Existino Hotel
The existing hotel is comprised of 3 buildings of varying age and construction. We refer tothem as Phase l, Phase ll and Phase lla and the west Parking structure. Uses in the Hotel areAU' DU, commercial, various food service operations, and convention, For the purposes ofour project, we will address only the uses of AU, DU and one particular restaurant space.Prints of each building's original design documents are in your archives under different
names. The following information is based on these documents ll would like to point outthat many of the units defined as DU's are owned by the Hotel and are operated as AU,s).
The current unit mix is as follows:
137,147
George Ruther
February 7, 1999 (revised from December 2, 1999)
Page 2
Lot area {including the parking structure) is approximately 222,273 SF. Under PA zoning,
allowabfe GRFA would be 8Oolo of that or 177,818 SF. Existing GRFA is therefore 77oh ol
allowable.
The "windows" restaurant, with a seating capacity of approximately 8s seats, is no longer .
in operation and is used only for special f unctions.
Existing parking is located below the buildings and in the west structure. By count, there are
407 spaces with 205 in the west structure. we are assuming that existing parking is
adequate and will be "grandfathered" in as such.
Prooosed New Construction & Chanqes
1. convert the "windows" restaurant space and 5 adjacent AU's into 3 or 4 DU's.
Parking requirements decrease by 1.6 spaces (85 seats/g seats per space less 4
spaces (2 units<2000 SFI and 5 spaces (2 units>2OO0 SF)).2. Upgrade exterior appearance of existing hotel buildings by doing the following:
Add steeply sloped roofs to lower the eave lines of the various buildings.
Roofing material proposed to be 40 year shadow-line type fiberglass shingles.
Add "landmark" roof elements to buildings ll and lla.
Remove wood siding at balconies on all buildings and install new metal railings in
varaous colors and patterns.
Remove most of the existing wood siding and replace with EIFS in several colors.
Repaint existing stucco.
Existing standing seam metal roofs remain to a large extent.
Add new retail spaces with heated sidewalks along west Lionshead circle at
Phase I and Phase ll when future economic conditions warrant,h. Remodel existing porte cochere.
3. New Phase lll atop existing west parking structure with interval ownership units in
accordance with the Lionshead Master plan.
a. 66 new units (see unit mix table below) totaling approximately 7b,0OO SF of
GRFA, Current drawings reflect the following unit mix and area:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
t.
v.
h Building amenities including front desk and Owner lounges.
Addition to parking structure with internal ramps and providing for completely
covered arrival. 61 new parking spaces whh an easy additional 15 via valet
positioning.
1O5O SF 2 BR
1450 SF 3 BR (2 BR w/ loft)
72,429
George Ruther
February 7, 1999 (revised from December 2, I ggg)
Page 3
4. Converting 9 existing DU's in Phase lla into deed restricted EHU's; 8 units are studios
with minimal kitchens and one unit is a one bedroom unit with full kitchen. Eased on a
recentlY completed project of similar size, the Phase ltl addition will create 25 new
iobs. At a requirement of 20% of this number, 5 new EHtJ's are required. lnstead of
the 9 units in Phase lla being deed restricted, we are now proposing to conver!.the
existing ski shop in Phase I into 6 new studio and one bedroom uniti (3 of each)
ranging in size from 39O SF to S2O SF.5. Modifications to landscape on Gore Creek side of complex including removal of most of
the existing high berm thus opening up to the bike path and the creekscape. one
tennis court to remain, the other one and the volley ball couft wiil go. other
modifications per the submitted plans.
Proposed total GRFA would be 209,576 SF or 1 18% of the total allowable on the site. This
is far less than the 25O% maximum that would govern in Lionshead and even less than the
1507o granted the Austria House in the Village.
Existing Buildings:
1 ' Proposed modifications to roofs comply with the design guidelines even though the
proposed slope exceeds 12:12; the steeper roofs will lower apparent eaves, balance
roof area with wall area.2' The proposed "landmark" roof elements will give the western edge of Lionshead the
presence of a "grand old hotel.,.3. Proposed streetscape elements do comply with the plan and guidelines.
New Building:
1. New buiEing is right at maximum height limits with the proposed steeply sloped roofs' and small areas of flat roof. We are well below the roof height average required.2. Our proposed 1 5: 1 2 roof pitch is steeper than the 1 2: 1 2 specif ied but again provides
significant aesthetic advantages the satisfy the intent of the guidelines: lower eave
heights and wall heights and a better balance between wall area and roof area. This
aesthetic benefit and addressing of intent is the basis for which we would seek
conditional approval as provided in Section 4.2.8.3. As for the small areas of flat roof,
they are comparable to those found at the Sonnenalp and would be visible only from
high on the mountain. They are also allowed under Section 4.2.9,1 .3. The issue of height and flat roofs could be resolved if the datum for measuring height
is set at the top of the existing parking garage instead of at surrounding grade. We
have an unusual case here for new construction in that we do not have the option of
putting the structure completely below grade as could be done with other new
buildings.
George Ruther
February 7, | 999 lrevised from December 2, | 999)
Page 4
I hope this gives you an adequate overview of our project. We look forward to the meeting
with the Council and PEC and a subsequently smooth approval process. We could
reluctantly accept staff approval on this one if required to do so.
Sincerely, '.
j
GWATHMEY PRATT AqCHFECTS, P.C.
t-l/tl ,") // ///J // lffi/X1t-- /14'-ry
Henry nlatt, etl
February 7, 1999
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail- major amendment to SDD- Gonditional Use permit
George:
Subsequent to our discussion last Friday, we are applying for a conditional use permit to
allow time-share units at the proposed Phase lll addition to the Marriott Hotel in Lionshead.
This application does not change the building or its bulk and mass in any way from thatpresented to the Council and PEC on January 12, 1999 and recently submitted for approvalby the PEC. Nor does it change in any way the impacts associated with this project light,air, Town objectives, traffic, etc). lt merely seeks permission to sell the units in a mannerthat is consistent with the current market and this project's location. I will point out thatboth fractional fee units and time-share units are conditional uses allowed under HDMF
zoning with no stated preference of one over the other.
The Phase lll component of the Marriott project is stated as a high priority project in the
Lionshead mdster plan. Regardless of whether it is approved as an amendment to anexisting SDD or as an exterior alteration under the new Lionshead zoning, what we areproposing will provide higher occupancy rates and more warm beds than a condominium(HDMF) project. For this reason alone, this conditional use permit for time-share under
HDMF should be approved.
A further explanation of why time-share is desirable is attached.
Sincerely,
,-2.'*
Henry R.att. AIA
CHULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
q
a
I{III
Er q',
'-'&"
I
'.9
ffi
l;
Ir
S'\__z/trrtr@ @
:
lli{
lHf
I's
o
tr
!
trH 1---:r
l$filusfll v*n"","-@mr-l I ll tl
t,-tt'|"ti
a
i
'-:::,,-i-: :
''-...'\\t)5
{
:
ll$
F
l9Fta
It
o
TE VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
\/AIL, COLORADO
j i
ITII
f,9ir.iIt d(-|]trO
=tl|-P
a
tllTllt
>Ioz
rtIIX>nurl
$R
io
-9
nl
fllfIoz
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
\r'AIL, (NLORADO
i
trTtrW
tr[tr@
ifl! ai[FR
' [rn ^'! -ntll, o
=2-Oil4-nlilf,ilt[-trr o-z
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE3ORT\/AIL, COLORADO
(ta
4
o
-n
TT
m
z
x
>3
I
i
I\ill1l\l
q3>><n(-n(\
A}.)fi;
>tr7u
oIru
m(])X
(tl-lzo
mq
FIzoo
o
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE3ORT
vAtL, coLoeADaHTEW
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
\r'AIL, COLORADOHTtrW W
\
a:
ztn
(tl
F$--l
o
m
\J
7
\
J
t$lct7
t9t>lo
lm
rT1
(-n
o
rn
o-t
zo
oq
r-
Uzoo
a
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT\/AIL, CALORADOHrE@
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
vAtL. coLoRAooHTtr@
\
o?o
ETi
9CZ
dui
fi^<)'
>trriix
ild>6[9
,$_
I u'9
a\JQ>Hi <
a
mc-!zo
zo
_rl
n
rntr
-n-{
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
VAIL, CDLSAOOntrM
o
{\
/\zB VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT\r'AIL,@L&^DOItrW
ttv
$'lHI
i
I
)
,/
)
(
.^
l
I
Wtr VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
VAIL, COLORADO
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
VAIL, COL6^DOEIMW
q r_l
rn
.A
o
(,\n
x
2.
Rx
nm
=
CD
onn
>1,
urlN
- I r..r
i(t!'lo!
I9t*iI
2q
.=
l*in
n-':'l
z
A
tt
.---"-----J,
--------- --€
-.-- --.---o
o
-- '.-- ---o
8 aiil4
- ti\)r lir:ilo6ll$
llril
ilo
lt>
llz
O
lloil>
llu'il=
ltn
it?
llo
llo
llrnlti
ia
llt
llut
llm
i-
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
EXI9TIN6 HOTEL FACELIFT - PHAgE I. II. IIA
VAIL, CALORADO
.h
F
.-..
'-
I E+
F
,h;.t
, -l::.-- :-':
z
6
c
=-{
z
IJ
t,. lJ-, L --
=I
-t
r.l
;l
I F
ETMW
| | lll trtrl
iil+il
!lts3ill-s
ll sE7
OIrIll r
ll lfl
ll F<It >-r
z
Efi-0m:ltrx
;ilaq:r[nt6;l-G
Ilz
Oll-ri
lmtt-tl
l
=
.0
Ao
Uo(t!
rna
o
I
rnrm
{
z
I nrnf fl- xlll> in
'llm =oll-o|(nlt olt qtl
11 rIFll m
lt flt -tti ollz
rrf tttrl
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
EXISTINo HOTEL FAcELIFT - PHA9E I. tI, IIA
\r'AIL. COLOR-ADOtr[trw
rtt tlttl
rtt ltttl
E IT'II
!il$q
: l[n ci
o ll- ul'll rnll s
ll rn>
Ulll -r
ll ril
ll hlt <ill| '-1loz
II#Tfll>m
iil$;ill-6
li rnlr >ItDlrrl mIF
i, >ll Iiloll=
S aa
:il$q
: llm ciol-O'll rnlqil>ll nl(tlll r
milfit<it >ll -liloz
mX
o-.tzo
rn(0
I
rflT
rfl
>foz
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
EXISTIN6 HOIEL FA6.ELIF,'I - PFIASE I, II, IIA
]/AIL,
'OLORADO
lllll
tf I lt I tl
lrrti
ENtrW
o
A
lld[1t
lto
llul
llm
lltr
!il9'll{
r llr: m.llf,
<>ll-{
llo
llz
8flm: X
;ilq
sllo
IZ
ltoltn-l
lF
llpm
lt<ill
lt6
Iz
I rn: X
.lt(n1ll.|=
,illo
I;>
llrn
llrqti-n1!r
lim
t1<illtI
lr9
lir
| 'i]
A>
lt(J|il'
ll=
Il
iill
lllY
:flo6 Ul'llm
lla>
llm
U)
ll-rrnllr
llrn
llt-1
O
il'aItall>ll(t
ll*
ll=
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
EXI9TIN6 I.{OTEL FACELIFT - PHASE I, II, IIA
vAtL, aoLoeADam[trw
I llmI X
;ilq
i ri\
O
llo
lllllr
llmllr-m
lt<il>l
llolz
8lt-0I ltt0:toq l-0:ilo
o ll(n'llrn
lla
llvllo
ll-rllm
llF
lltll:l
llo
ilr
lrllltlioll'
ll=
I rn
} LIX:t61 l-{
ulo
ll$
ilq
ll"1
llrn
il6
lt<.illrt-
ilo
|7
ti-0
ll$llo
llm
ll=I
ll
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
EXI9TIN6 HOTEL FACELIFT - PHASE I, II, IIA
vAtL, )OLS^DO
Aoao(.t\
m
o
c--lI
mT
rn
>I
z
filuEW
flltll
K iin
i llx
JIIUI.'|=
'llo
llo
ir4
iF
llrnllr-llm<
tr.t-
llo|(
Aitr
ll>
llttl
il*
llo
I
rrtttfI;t-'-g@J
@J
| $;il ilI rn (ll lll--I l;1g;J, vn.tL' co
rrtltl r!rltl
Irttl
TnoT
ul
rfl
ur
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
EX|ST|N6 taOlEL FAcE|d-'I - PHA9E t. lt,
'tAv\tt-, coLS.AooETtrW
I aar7t
6qmci
-ul'tr
Uq
r
:ololrnq
olz
E []' .Il
ril$q
: llm tiill, sflt "lliE
il-ilaZll o
ll ItII FI
Oll -.tll 6llz
i{ ta rn:IIIX:l>(oitltJl:
6 r-ot.IU]l> c.llFll o
lrnt-]$tmlt oIl -{ii 6
lt -
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
EXISTIN6 HOTEL FACELIFT - PF{AgE I, II, IIA
\/AIL, COLORADO
itt ltlll
l
ftttl
FIIIEW
tt
iilfr$
6ll- (n'll r rn
O
llle
il6ltz
Oll o
m
O-{ll o-z
I(JrTmE -X
;ildq
'llm z{ll-o
ll rrn
il>Eil>Flt g
Izll o
O
m
O{il0llz
ttr ttttl
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
EXISTINe FIOTEL FAoELIFT - PHASE I, II, IIA
VAIL. COLORADOHt]trM
trr ttttl
rnx6I
z.o
@
F
2o
Iil]
;llfi.llm
{ll=
lll
ll^
il
!ll-18
;il6q
'r ll- "'|| o
IIHFl*g
l6t-
11 u!ll rnrl oll -lll otiz
I[-!T
iilfi$
o ll= Ul' rail,a
lllet-ilqIzll o
OmIo-rr6z
I T ril:]IIX^ >;i.:llo:i
r i=q
ii ,o
ll>s
il>b\t=lolullrflo-tlx
ilz
'Il
Foaoomq
-
z
a\
o
mo-'l
oz
urrn --o-l
Uz
I llltlttl I t | | | | | | .'l
ll | | | | | | t
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
EXISTING FIOIEL FACELIFT - PHA9E I, II, IIA
VAIL, CPLAADO
$
{
i
o
lt
o
m
o0
I lt ll tt tt il [
HTtrW
trl frf
liltl ttltl
il tam:ltrx
;iffiq
:llmz
6ll= O
ll>olrc:
ll$bIzll o
Ulll rn:''
O..|-iloll z--
rflX
tol-zo
oq
t-
zo
$ut-o
=oz
-
q
n
so
rno
(!
F
zo
omq
6z
t
I
o(I
rfl
I
I
-r
(rr
rn
I
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
EXI9TIN6 IiOTEL FACELIFT - PHASE I. II, IIA
VAIL, COL&ADO
Itl
rrltl irltl
ENtrW
oo
$ 1r-0 I
:ll* i
:ilfiis
"lF;
ll I q
lF5Izll oIomIl oIfl6llz
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
EXISTINe HOTEL FACELIFT - PHASE I, II. IIA\r'AIL, COLORADO
!ll
rtltl
E[trW
ll'fl1'r I 1.,t"' -----'*"'*:-- - - -
t
tI
.i/l
{:
o
tidT.'v'
nx
=0t
r-
m
rnr-
N
mnn
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9OR,T
6OFIE C?EER CLIJB - PHA9E IIt
VAIL, COL&^DO
!
!
i
I
i5
tfI
E[trW
Al:lr BEli':r;19
;;: I$arl
crii
Ell
I
a
I
E
iil= I
-||\|zilft o'
ll:f;
IEfill"'rii ollz
l1*
ll
/(r/'v
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
6ORE CREEK 6LIJE - PHAgE III
vAtL,coLoRAootrtrtrw
E:
a;
;
;:
T_
g
--LI
I
---:-I
I
Ii.
-,1+" j-6:+--:r'6Ps.br=rr
\Lii t-;-tffiffill
*$nl
96
lil= *r llr F
,ll3 F
nF r-.m
IIE F
ll d
tl
+-E
___+ rq
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
ooRE cF<EeKcLtB - PHA9e ll
vAtL. coLd.ADotrTtrW
oo
- --,,rlrtn.Cl!flVtisr: " -.----'
t!:!':sar,,
i
I
,
t
a
Fgn('jnl-:e;o
illE ]', -r 7l'llr tr
illS 6
llr- T
ll+ i
ilfrE
llH;t1 rt; l)Intii'
.v
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
@RE CEEEK 6LUB . PHAgE III
VAIL, COLORADO
li9:m3.! u
i i: sll r t Eli _-- --lt-- -- l: - - --t t _i_il r_ r. _.!_--I - .. -.-8. .".-n.-. -. -t.
!
T;
s
E
ri
trTE@
i
I
tI
t
<F>2!70(nniq6
riltrEW
l( [c:
> llz:ll-i llr
: llrn
'116lF
lldCr
tl
tl
V
,.==* ,-.".:r-ro] i--:
=, I-:I,,IEF: -r,..
Hffi.--$'r-1 lffil iiiffiffi"ffi*#1
li
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
OORE CREEK CLI.ts - PHAgE III
\r'AIL, COLORADO
frrlilE
irdlrii
:^:\=_/.€\.t
- -a_.:- p_i I i,r
- l+-* 'f!= r t.b:,J=xr\k
I
E
/__
$s\d,J=E \a;'j-l l#l :
Jl ;TTF+-ryf;1
-I
I3==S,;-::+lg|i=ii ii . :---/ -. i 3! :-.- -li ."--". " ,,-, ! | i
L \--'l ,C i | '
.--:.1
/''}.-r(,/ 'r\'lr4/
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RESORT
@RE CREEK CLLE - PHAgE III
VAIL, COLORADOETtrW
oo
/ -- I+r il -(. | !_F"\, 1->|') "--d t;i-. .1tr;L-; ;ru
f' "i '-f
F\.j-A
i.r l
"J-:=-*{=,l- r# r
I
I
6i
xIc>llz
:ll-l1 llt-: llrn
i116
ll;
ll'
il
I
Y
ittit
I
a
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
6ORE 6REEK ALUB . PHAgE III
vAtL, c)LSAOOE[trW
oo
,.,,A at
)\V Stri t:t "'
- 1->-
1
fi :El I
Rrq,llz- "i
'llr
: llrn
'll$
il;
il2
il9
il-
ll
,--^v)
r-- - ,-:--i - -:rG;w9.,;:
r=- L
.,1 a_-_€/,.:4;=.---.-+€
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
€ORE CREEK CLUA - PHASE III
VAIL, COLA^DO
-ry-Fl
:'r -L- Li\2 ?-.
t,_
c
E1!;l;lEri
,,li
il d
8i t
El$IB
Es\
g!
NU\AA
9-6
EI
tr[tr@
oo
_ - -- ,1t,n Cl
!F'{?Sr: ''
-.-----"*": -
x -t:I I t d 3
Eil'
E [lli
I
B
rt tlt$t!
t it I !grll
r!
Ii;;d!
TT!
at:iii
t
Et
t'
x
III
t
i
t
t
t:
BI
t
{
;I
!
ir
I
t
I
,|z:llr.'llrrllm
6lt<m
llrm
ll6r
ll-
ll
il
V
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
6ORE CREEK OLW . PHAgE NI
vAtL. coL&.ADOE[trW
ooo
srn
iilR
iilY
;lh
c llr>
ll=
1l
il
I
I
'iv'
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
6ORE CTEEK CLI,E - PHAgE III
vAtL, aoLS^OOtrt]EW
!rm
iilh
i ll-rllmI-
llrfl<
ll>-{
ll6
t-
I
il
ll|>: trn:toilr
llrnrlr
llrrt<llll--1
llot'
I
1l
oo
|| tr E t It a * t'Ir Itir ct i+++++114
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
ERE C?EEK CLUB - PHASE III
\/AIL, COLORADO
$ilfrifi$fir
trtrtrw
ooo
Inz
iilRi ll.-a-llm
ilfi
lltlli
llo
ll=
ll
r tu!ito.lc: t-t
it;
llh
lltllr
llo
ll=
1l
++tlttlt!,!tt 1!1. Iq:${r I l[ ltl
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN RE9ORT
OORE CREEK CLIJB - PHASE III
vAtL, coLoQAootrTEM
ooi
I rtrfl
iild
i lli
it>
il$
ll-r
UI
llrn
ila
!_"1
llo
llz
TfifiTITIi I1{tlt11r
VAIL MARRIOTT MOUNTAIN REgORT
OORE CR,EEK CLIJts - PHAgE III
VAIL, COLORADO
rils
: ilu)ill;
llF
lltll-r
il0llz
llo
ilfl
ll-'l
llo
il=
ii iiFiriF iii: ii:r++i,ti11
l[ff
tr[EW
oo
UTEFPPFHN44+^.1e...:
t rtrJ.J g'4d,rIUE
-- t?tt4{q tfJ+19
eogTl^lA
-' Hw;rn./ qpi^qE-
l+E E T :-EHu . izl+ev Nb rrut qAqAFDE|.{ Fv'ptra __
*-\.\
={=t*
I oo
str
!F
-fi[\
H
tr
F
ry
-94-1Er\
VAIL I"TARRIaTT MoUNTAIN KESoRT
EXT'N{4 HargL FACELF.T
I$
$$
4g
96(r
oo
East West Partners
Gcorge Ruther
Toqac of Vaii
75 S. Frontagc Rd. West
vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Ruthcr:
Febnury 8, 1999
Ir.t€Fvsl-errste*sbiPr tinesne€t frectiend o+ne*Crip.rnd residenee elups are all part of the
samc family of rcal cstatc. Thcy re all variations of the idea of su!-divi.ting a piece of
real c.rsta ilr-olda- to lo*ss-rhe so6r:-d baselcs-oig€s*g iByo\cd in thc resort real
estate market. Choosing the concct amount of ownership is based on the cost, iocauon,
a$d the de$o$sphlcsof tberargetrn $:€LfoFq particutar properry.
The fotlowing chart outlincs somc sizcs of interval owncrship intcrcsts arorud ski
corntry E'ld bailr rnrrrh tinc thly 4lt6g1 aarh orl,oer tO use pcf, yeat
100 E^sr tHoMAs PLACE . t'.O. DRAVER l1?C I AVON, COLORADO 81610rrsrr?lfi]Ttt?cf Frrt?C-0{t. " lC J
Asa general bencsrtothec€mst$siq6 atineshareproperty-fulfiugs€.veral basic nceds of
both the pcrmansot and tbe traosicst rcsidcnt. This is cvidcnccd by rapid pace at which
tltis isdustry isgrowiog uzorldnrid+ According telbe Vacati*&wership Industy, a
study by ARDA, interval ownership is the fastest growing segrnent of the tavel and
leiqpe rnrrJcel Tbefolhwing ciec*rssio*reprerent+ju*a fer+dthe valsable reasons
why propcnies srch as the Gore Crcck Club hal'e been so well received by thc
sonmu$tic+ir+whiebtbcy a*ebuilr end b1r dles€ F$€hpring the propcrties.
By creating the right size of interval orrnership for a particular prop€rty, interval
owxr*ippropccties3serblelq3ttteccrndSetfer r€teb tbe vrl$able.guests qn which our
rcsort dcpcnds
Irtervel Size
Property Intervd Size Timc Pcr Yeai
EfattMourtEirrlodgs
Beaver Creek, Colorado
vm'".Approx. l7 Days
ParkPlaz
Beaver Crcek. Colorado
l/I0*s--wEE-
Postc Montmc lrdge
Beaver Creck, Colorado
l/51'I Wcck
Frurz Klammcr Lodge l/10 5 Weeks
oo
Many variations have been creatcd in intenal ownership; howwer, the Gore crcck club
weul4be.b€gt-cuitcd for a shesc approxinatclyl/206 in size.
whan thc propcrty is not divided far euough, like thc Park Ptazo, Thc Franz KlEmmcr,
an4 The Deer VCley ClBb rhe cers$ eur u€igb th€ b€acfirs of incrva\ owncrship in many
wa,Vs. Fir,st, the cost to buy into thc property becornes too close to the'cos of buyilg an
otder susllcr'full'o*ncrrhip Fopcr+Ecsby. Tbccoc-|qpnrhacain thcse largcr sbare
propenies can nn well above s25Q000. Secoudly, the cost ofnpkeep becomec morc
fiBn most owucrsare willingro peg Mosr inte:val owrcretrippropcrtics offcr thcir
owTlers more amcnitics than a tlpical condo. Whcn dividing thc cost of thesc amenitics
among fcwcr owncrs, each owner's expense becomes greater. Fnraxy, the financial cost
ottisebccomcs 1qq rnueh fq1 6q31 awtrgrs. InrcrralOwnc$-enioy thc frccdom to tavct
exrensively tbrough thcir exchangc nenrorks. Howcvcr, most of thcrn arc unablc ro
vacatios asmasy ac.5.or.6.wccks.p6 ycaL. Thcir faaily ard jobobligations only a[ov 2
or 3.
Isrhep$gl$cyeuctbelllaeMounraioJadge in Bcaver.Cr.eek has shoum tbc grcat
value of a medium sizcd fraction. At l/20r", thc ovmcr reocives onc week of primc ski
timran&an-rdditional ' 1 0'days of nnnmer u&gc cvery ,€ar. This .mix fits vcry well with
the dcmogrryhics of thc vail vallcy clicnt, Thcec owucn terd to comc from out of statc
for onc or rwo visiusper yer witrbotr sunner arrd rvhtcr waBq rt tbe Hyat! these
owners have a $rong seose of loplty and owncrship in their propcrty. Howcvcr, if they
are not ablc to usc all ofthcir tlmc hcrc, thcy are abfc to usc ii ttuough thcir cxchange
trchrorlr qor'''ewh.'e clrc. Thcy arc 1g1 forcqd lo buy aod minain propcrty thcy do not
use.
F
Demograpbics
ose of,tbe firslconccrns meny communities have when an ieteorl qynership property is
proposed is, whom will this propcrry atiract, The drrnographice of thc typicat
"onsu-oof i*erval orurc*ship .propcrty in.the Vail Vallry areno djffcscor.rhas thit of our high-
end hotcls and lodges. Thc Hyan Monntain Lodge in Bcavcr crcck sold 7so l?ot.
sharcs to approrimatcly496"u-rr in;urt ovcr truo ysrs. The fouqwiqg sratistics abour
these inrenral owDcrs wcrc compiled from a suwcy of these owners in Marctr of 199E.
t. 1l4et theyerr+-20o4s*,1 strdios, 45!+ eve2 bearoon condos, aud 35%
own 3 bedroom condos.
2. Hoonrnoch thcy cr*- 96%.cara morc rban lr0O,Ooopcr year, ani! 73o/o ea:-
more than $150,000 per year.
F
.b.
oo
r Hoo, ollth€y uc - 47ye Ee bet*Gcrl 36.Dd 4s, & 4c% are bctween 46 and,
56.
4. Horr E rch. they.vacation - 39+ bctrseen 7 and t 4dayrs, 3 3% beNeen 15 and2l days, and,Zlo/o bcrwcen 22 and.28 days.
5. Slho.Srcy vacrtions with --61% vacatiorrwi& famibr&Kids, l g% vacarion
as couplcs, frd l6Vo vacatioa with fricnds.
6. Wharfreydoon vgsdion - 88Zo vacarion to eki, 4596 vacation to golf, and
l87o vacation to play tennis.7 whae thcy are 6om - TEcy rcprcscnt almost all 50 states plus scveral forcign
couatrlc+iactudiugl4erico,.Greet Britain,pucrtolice, Vcnczlel4 S. AfriJa,
Gcrmany, Canada, Austn4 Aruba, and panama.
TbeoumersrrtheHyan Mountab-rrd€€ in Beavcr creek ap thaqme clcnr tbat have
vacationcd in Bcavcr crcck and sayed at the Hyan Regcncy for ycas. Tlt"y, too, could
bas'e beconre bomeowncrs inBeavcr.crcck long ago" Howwer, theyprcfcncd thc bcnsr
locatron and the many amenities of the Hyatt Regcncy md olhcr upscale hotcls iu the
velley, \Albes &e opportuniry to own 8 propstty ndth sirnilar ameqitics md location at
only rhe fraction of thc cost of other condos, they knew what thcy preferrcd. Thc eese of
entry-and gudtty-of.thc propcrty made thcrn orvncts and rcom gucsts for many yc8rs ro
The Goecreelcch&ievdrwitto&r thicsasre oppornrniry. The clients that hqve
cnjoyed thc vail vallcy formany ycars, but choose aot to purchase a home, will find the
quori+}t location and esse of enty vcry atuactivc. They will becooe intcnral owncrs in
the Lionshead area and will return year after ycar to thcir property.
Live Beds
Tbe-blggcslgoarof-a.deetinEtiou rcaort propcrry is to propcrly yield managc thcir
inventory. Yicld managem€nt is the proccss of flucturtiqg rstes in ordcrto maximize the
totaloccup:acy of.aproperty wlrile sioulraneously maximizing total gross rwenue.
However, in a destination reson gucb as Vail, Colorado, it is often difficult to use such a
ptoc€ss- Thus, thclumbcr.of occupicd properties (Live Beds) is not optimizcd.
In areas such as Vail, the majority of thc propefties are owned by individuals and, ifre$e4nrmg€d$tlan.on circpropcrry msnsgemenr finx T\ere are two inherenr
problems facing rhe number of livc beds iq the vail valley. First, only a few of the
owrcrcshooec to rcot thcir propcrtics.
As an example, let's assuure approximately 35% of the second home owtrcrg
choos'-to r-'t their propccicsand.tbe other 65%onlyuser\eirproperties for 2l&ys pcr ycar. Even at an occupancy rate of 70yo for the rental proicrtics the
totd-occupeacyf,or.tte velley dropr to lcss thrn 307..
Secondly, it is difficult for the property mimsgcr to mansgc thc yield of the propertics
EFdr E'gilsble. w,itbotyocordara''-rq treuaft isdtb€roeeupicd cir cipty in rhe
oo
€ycs of ths owncr. Thc pnpclty msDsg€r can not offcl osc rqom ar I discount and
anotrrer a!lprcPrruD snd havc an offcetpositive fcld. If the property manegcr operatcd
in thi+f$hicn, he would.be stealing froo onc onnrcr ro pay hioself aad another ot6cr.
It is precisely this problco thu kccps thc Vail Valley from filliry our rooms more often
trarno't
ht"""! owncrship is a good solution rc this problcm. Thcre arcscvcral reasoas why this
tlae of owncrship offers a bettcr quality, more higbly occupied propcrty.
1, Rcturn gucsts - With the dividing of thc owncrship iuterest csmes the
dividing of tbe ouaerebip aost. By bringing dova thc largcst obstaclc to
becoming en owncr (money), the Vail Valley cu guarant-c tru grrasts will
bccome owDers rnd rcturn year aftcr year2 Higbrc Qualiiy - In an ind'sry with over a90% satisfrction rating quality of
product is one of thc primary rcaoons thccc owucrs arc plcased- Uy Oviahg
8rc cost.of.maintaining a propcrry anrong muhiple oq4lcrs, there ii more
money to be spent on rcpairs and maintcnmce. This allows intcriors and
cxturiurro @uffieu; avoidingdreplovcrbial orange shag
carpct we often sec in oldcr propcrties.
5. Eive Fcds - htcrval owners fon't come back cvery ytat However, whcn
tbay do notoccupy tbeir condo, thcy almost dways scod somcone elsc.
Intenral International is the association thc a[owc owners of one interval
oumcrship.properly to.tade it with anothcr. The nunber of mcobccs in the
organizatioa is now in cxccss of 400,0fl) families. If onc of thc ovmcrs of rhe
crorc-creck club.chooses not.ro use his propsry,.otreof.thcsc 400,000 clicnts
will soon bccome one of the Vail Vallcy's ncwest guests.
For tlese.reasons, intcrnal onacrship has becn a great solution for mauy resons hoping to
maximizc thc awrbcr of guests in to*n ycar rorud. Thc postc Montanl Iodge in Beavcr
crcrk i! a grcat c*ar4lc of a ptqerty tlst belprbrfttg:sceffio.town year tound, as
shonrnby &eir live year total occupancy chan.
February 69c6 91% 95% gJ% U%M.Fch. S3% 87% $+%. 96% gZ%April 36% 67% T7% 78c/o 77%s,€y 6%. 6% 4S%. 61% s9%June 65% Zfh 7O%- 09% T4%Jt*y 7g%. Z6% ert( A3% T4oloAugust 80% 67o/o g07o' lsoh TTo/oSeptember. ?9.b 6g% ??lo- Z6% TA%octobcr 42% g% 5S% 61% 64%November- Se96 Wh 649Gl 69yo &%O.6mb.r 71c/o Sg% Z2!c 91% U%
This chart.shows that.he rvgagc occupatrc,y of thc postc MontaD&Lodgc is well abovc
tbe aPccted occuPancy of.any hotcl, and far exceeds tbc very best cood'ourinium rental
oo
trsrsgErrErrpoul @Tup?trqfrEtcs. Crcatiaga larger ycar roudchcntele will ultimatclv
help every buinessowncr and employec in the Veil Valley.
It is of paramount importancc that wc continue the legacy of thc vail Valley as Nonh
Arnedests number onc ski destination. By iasuing that tho $ality.guests, on whom oru
valley relies, conrinue to visit ycar after year., wc will be able to uphold this tradition.
Irtennl ouacrsbigisz gped fusr$Ep in-gurantaeingrbst tlrssrowners urill rerun to
use theirproperty and spcnd moncy in our valley for many years to coEc.:W
Section 1
Section 2
Section 5
Section 3 Interval ownership Benefits- community pageT-12
Section 4
' Interval Ownership Presentation
East West Partners
Table of Contents
Interval Ownership History
Interval Ownership Benefits - Consumer
Interval Ownership & The Vail Valley
Look Who's Talking About Interval
Ownership
Page24
Page 5-6
Page 13-14
Pages 15-23
What is Interval Ownership?
Interval ownership offers the opportuniry to purchase fully furnished vacation properr,v
sold in a variety of forms, such as weekly intervals or point based usage systems. For a
one-time purchase price and the palment of an annual maintenance fee, purchasers own
their ponion of the vacation property in perperuiry. owners share both the gse and costs
of upkeep of their unit and common facilities.
There are manv formats of ounership, varying both in size of the interest purchased and
hox' it can be used. Based on the location and the demographics of the target market,
inten'als range in size from li50'h (giving the owner one-week per year), up to % (giving
the owner 26 weeks per year). In addition the owners have multiple ways in which to use
the time they own. Systems vary from a specific week in a specific unit (fixed week
fixed time), to a floating system w'here the owner may select any week in a certain season
(floating time).
Re-Introduction the Interval Ownership (Timeshare) Industry
If you formulated your opinion about the interval ou'nership industry more than a few
vears aso. it is time to re-examine just what is happening in this business. The interval
ou'nership industry has gone through a long maturing process. It can be characterized by
three distinct phases.
The indusrry started in the French Alps in the late sixties. It wasn't long before
unscrupulous individuals in the united States found a way to exploit this good idea to
their advantage. For the greater part of the seventies, timeshares were conversions of old
condominium properties that were difficult to sell because of financing or lack of quality.
unscrupulous developers typically sold them with no follow-up management after the
sale. This ima-se was u'ell ingrained in many Americans for a long time to come.
The second phase of timeshare came in the early eighties. During this time period many
reputable developers recogrrized the benefits the sub-dividing ofresort real estate can
offer. During this time period many developers began to purpose build timeshare
properties. These were often in prime locations with prime amenities. However, the old
timeshare image was still hard to dispel.
It wasn't unril the third phase of evolution in the industry that it finally shed its old :
image. The entrance of many name brand operators characterizes this phase. Marriott
was the first nationally branded hotel company to change many people's opinion. They
led the way in the mid-eighties and have been joined now by almost every major hotel
brand including Four seasons, Hyatt, Hilton, Ramada, and many more. with every major
hotel brand now involved in this industry, most Americans are beginning to understand
its benefits. They see that a reputable company is selling a quality product and staying in
the business to take care of the consumer. after the sale.
Interval ownership has truly matured and shed the problems associated with it in its early
years. From its beginnings in the French Alps in the late sixties, interval ownership has
become the fastest growing segment of the u.S. travel and tourism industry. It has
enjoyed a -erowth rate of more than l6% per yezu since 1993. There are now more than
4,000 resorts located in 81 countries, with more than 3 million families in I 74 countries
worldwide enjoying the benefits of this ownership opportunity.
Large Companies Involved in Interval Ownership
Name o # ofProject # of Total Units
Disney Vacation Club 4 1,339
Fairfield Communities 20 3,680
Hilton Grand Vacationi 5 566
Hyan Vacation Club )205
Marriott Vacation Club 35 3,000
Ramada Vacation Suites l5 868-----
Shell Vacations LLC T0-I,154
Sunterra Resorts 70 5,039
Visatana Development Ltd-l0 1,725
l.
Interval Ownership Benefits - Consumer
lnterval ownership offers the owner many benefits ranging from pride of ownership in a
particular resort to the benefit of owning deeded real estate. The following list is not
exhaustive, but does outline many of the tangible benefits why more than 40yo of
interval owners purchase additional shares.
Higher Quality Accommodations - of more than 2,000 US interval owners surveyed
in 1995, 83.1% responded that "certainty of quality accommodations" was a.,very
important" factor in their decision to purchase. By dividing the initial cost of
development over the number of shares sold in a property, the total cost to each
individual is greatly reduced. This allows the developer to increase the total expense
for the development project, allowing him to have better locations, better amenities
and higher quality interiors and exteriors.
Higher Level of Maintenance - Along the same lines as item number one, a higher
level of maintenance means a better assurance of quality of accommodations. In
today's inflated resort real estate market. renting accommodations has become a risky
proposition. The rates are high, but no one knows just what they will get. Many
second homeowners buy into their resort home and spend tens of thousands of dollars
to redecorate and upgrade the property. However, afterjust a few years in the rental
pool, the quality begins to wane. The owner has only used the property five or six
times, but already it is time to replace the sofa and all of the linens. They are often
reluctant to make these financial outlays. However, with interval ownership, the cost
of maintenance is spread over the entire group. This allows more money per unit to
be collected without burdening any one owner; creating a better quality reson many
years down the road.
Better Locations & Amenities - In today's market place, it is the overall resort
experience that is selling real esrate. Not just the physical property or the
salesmanship. It is the relationship of the property to onsite and nearby amenities.
Some examples include: the Disney vacation clubs located on Disney property in
orlando, the Marriott Palm Desert Resort with multiple golf courses, tennis facility
2.
J.
and full service spa, and the new Riverpointe Napa Valley property in the heart of
wine country' The Vail Valley is no different. Our consumerc want proximity to the
slopes and a full array of on-site facilities. With the cost of land at a premium in the
valley, it is only logical that these sites should be available to multiple families.
4. Exchange Network - Along side "certainty of quality accommodation,"..flexibility
offered through the vacation exchange opporfunity't rryas the second most clted reason
for owning this type of properry. As the size of the world shrinks, thanks to faster
and less expensive travel, people are choosing to travel to a variety oflocations more
often. Interval International (II), an international exchange company, offers 1500
properties worldwide. using a system of equitable exchange, an owner from the Vail
valley may choose to use a different propeffy at the beach or even Europe. There is
no feeling of being locked into one resort, like many people feel when buying a
second home. II offers these owners exchanges as their gateway to the world.
These four general benefits are not exhaustive, but do offer the four main reasons
consumers are beginning to prefer interval ownership. In fact, two statistics reported by
ARDA (the American Resort Development Association), characterize the overall
satisfaction most owners are experiencing.
41-2o/o of those who have owned eight years or longer have purchased
additional intervals within that time.
85.2% of owners are satisfied with their purchase, and,76%oreport having
their quality of life being positively impacted by their purchase.
Interval Ownership Benefits - The Community
The biggest goal of a destination resort property is to properly yield manage their
inventory. Yield management is the process of fluctuating rates in order to maximize the
total occupancy of a property while simultaneously maximizing total gross revenue.
However, in a destination resort such as Vail, Colorado, it is often difficult to use such a
process. Thus, the nunrber of occupied properties (Live Beds) is not optimized,
In areas such as.Vail, the majority of the properties are owned by individuals and, if
rented, managed by an on site property management firm. There are three inherent
problems facing the number of live beds in the vail valley. First, only a few of the
owners choose to rent their properties.
As an example, let's assume approximately 35% of the second home owners
choosetorenttheirpropertiesandthe other65o/oonlyusetheirpropertiesfor2l
days per year. Even at an occupancy rate of 70%o for the rental properties the
total occupancy for the valley drops to less than 307o.
Secondly, it is diflicult for the property manager to manage the yield of the properties
made available. With only one owner per unit, the unit is either occupied or empty in the
eyes ofthe owner. The properfy manager can not offer one room at a discount and
another al a premium and have an offset positive yield. If the property manager operated
in this fashion, he would be stealing from one owner to pay himself and another owner.
It is precisely this problem that keeps the vail valley from filling our rooms more often
than not.
Thirdly, most of our condominium properties are not set up for transient occupancy. In
order to truly atfract destination resort travelers today, it is important to offer a high level
of service. Many of our condominium properties do not offer front desk, concierge and
bell services on site. They are operated from a remote location adding to the confusion of
many guests. However, most interval ownership properties are set up to operate like
hotels, offering the most culrent amenities and services. This helps to attract and retain a
higher level guest.
Interval ownership is a good solution to these problems. There are several reasons why
this type of ownership offers a better quality, more highly occupied properry.
l. Return guests - with the dividing of the ownership interest comes the
dividing of the ownership cost. By bringing down the largest obstacle to
becoming an owner (money), the vail valley can guarantee that guests will
become owners and return year after year.
2. Higher Quality - In an indusrry with over an g5.2o/o satisfaction rating, quality
of product is one of the primary reasons these owners are pleased. By
dividing the cost of maintaining a properfy among multiple owners, there rs
more money to be spent on repairs and maintenance. This allows interiors and
exteriors to be upgraded more often, avoiding the proverbial orange shag
carpet we often see in older properties.
3. Live Beds - Interval owners don't come back every year. However, when
they do not occupy their condo, they almost always send someone else.
Interval Intemational is the association that allows owners of one interval
ou'nership property to trade it with another. The number of members in the
organization is now in excess of 400,000 families. If one of the owners of the
Gore creek club chooses not to use his properfy, one ofthese 400,000
.customers will soon become one of the Vail valley's newest guests. Interval
International uses a system of like exchange. This means that the owner
trading into the Vail valley will be relinquishing a properry of similar quality
from a different destination. The demographics of the guests trading in will
be very similar to the demographics of our owners. These guests are new to
the valley and would not have vacationed here ifthey could not have
exchanged their property for the Gore creek club. This customer base is an
excellent marketing opportunity for the communiW.
For these reasons, interval ownership has been a great solution for many resorts hoping to
maximize the number of guests in town year round. The poste Montane Lodge in Beaver
creek is a greal example of a properry that helps bring guests to town year round, as
showa by their five year total occupancy chart.
February
March
April
May
JUNE
July
August
September
October
November
December
Yearly
Average
690/o
83o/o
38o/o
460/o
65o/o
7Oo/o
80o/o
79Yo
42o/o
50o/o
75o/o
OC'/o
91o/o
87o/o
67o/o
460/o
71o/o
760/o
67%
68%
Uo/o
7Oo/o
83%
73o/o
95o/o
91o/o
77o/o
49o/o
7Oo/o
81o/o
80o/o
72o/o
58Yo
640/o
72%
7 5o/o
93o/o
96%
7$Yo
61o/o
69%
83o/o
75%
76/o
61o/o
69a/o
91o/o
760/o
s4%
92o/o
77o/o
45o/o
7 4o/o
74o/o
77o/o
78o/o
64!o
SOVo
84o/o
7 5o/o
This chart shows that the average occupancy of the poste Montane Lodge is well above
the expected occupancy ofany hotel, and far exceeds the verybest condominium rental
management pool occupancy rates. Creating a larg€r year round clientele will ultimately
help every business owner and employee in the Vail Valley.
ARDA staristics help support the argument that interval ownership prcpefiies bring more
guests that vacation more frequently.
The average year round occupancy of interval ownership resorts was over
80%
Interval owners will retum to their home resorts an average of 5.5 times
during the next l0 years, as compared with an average ofjust 2.7 times if they
1994 1995 1
had not purchased the ownership. (Industry research suggests that Mountarn
properties have an even higher level ofowner usage)
r when not using the property for themselves, interval owners send a friend,
rent the properfy or trade the property. They only left it unused 9o/o of the
time.
Demographics ,
One of the first concems many communities have when an interval ownership property is
proposed is, *,hom will this property attract. The demographics of the typical consumer
of inten'al ownership properfy in the Vail Valley are no different than that of our high-
end hotels and lodges. The Hyatt Mountain Lodge in Beaver creek sold 750 l/20t,
shares to approximately 400 clients in just over two years. The following statistics about
these interval owners were compiled from a survey of these owners in March of 199g.
what they own - 20o/o own studios, 45%o own2 bedroom condos, ard.35o/o
own 3 bedroom condos.
Hou' much they eam - 960/o earn more than $ 100,000 per year, and,73%o eam
more than $150,000 per year.
How old they are - 47vo are between 36 and 45, and 43%o arebetween 46 and
56.
How much they vacation - 30% between 7 and 14 days. 33% between 15 and
2l days, and2loh between 22 and28 days.
who they vacations with - 6l% vacation with family & Kids, lgolo vacation
as couples, and 160/o vacation with friends.
what they do on vacation - 88% vacation to ski, 45% vacation to golf, and
l8%o vacation to play tennis.
where they are from - They represent almost all 50 states plus several foreign
countries, including Mexico, Great Britain, puerto Rico, Venezuela, s. Africa.
Germany, Canada, Austria, Aruba. and panama.
The owners at the Hyatt Mountain Lodge in Beaver Creek are the same clients that have
vacationed in Beaver creek and stayed at the Hyatt Regency for years. They, too, could
have become homeowners in Beaver creek long ago. However, they preferred the bener
location and the many amenities of the Hyatt Regency and other upscale hotels in the
valley. When the opportunity to own a propefty with similar amenities and location at
only the fraction of the cost of other condos, they knew what they preferred. The ease.of
entry and quality of the property made them owners and retum guests for many yeius ro
come.
The Gore creek club in Vail will offer this same opportunity. The clients that have
enjoyed the vail valley for many years, but choose not to purchase a home, will find the
quality' location and ease of entry very attractive. They will become interval owners in
the Lionshead area and will retum year after year to their property.
Resale Value - Vail Vallev
In general terars, interval ownership is not sold as an investrnent to the consumer.
However, the vail valley enjoys a unique position in the Interval ownership industry.
Due to a very limited supply and a higher quality over many areas, the historical values
of the newer projects in the Vail/Beaver Creek area have increased with the value of
general real estate. This fact has helped to open up this type of ownership to many
individuals that would not have considered itjust a few years ago.
Four projects in the Vail Valley currently have some sort of historical data supporting the
relative increase in interval real estate values.
o St. James, Beaver Creek - A resale analysis by Slifer Smith &
Frampton/VARE from l/l/94 to ll/30197 shows an averale annual
retum of 17.26%o.*
The Poste Montane, Beaver Creek - A resale analysis by East West
Resorts Real Estate from uu93 ro 213/97 shows an average annual
return of 13.71%.
The Marriott Streamside, Vail - The current price for a two bedroom
floating winter season share is 29,900, this same property sold in l9g9
for $ I 7,900. This represents an average annual retum of approximately
5o/o.
o The Hyatt Mountain Lodge, Beaver creek - Although this property
just opened and the resale program has not fully developed, there are
approximately 30 shares on the resale market. These shares are listed
at approximatery 40%o over their purchase price from less than one
year ago.
Real estate values are an important factor for many consumers of interval ownership and
second homes. By bringing a high quality interval ownership property to the Lionshead
area' we will see an overall increase in the value of real estate and the rate at which the
values grow. .
*value of vacation time utilized by the owner is not factored into the refum. If the cost
of altemative accommodations axe factored into the retums, the total return would be
even greater.
$
U
$
$
$
$
D
U
$
2,884 $
3,1 15 $
3,364 $
3,633 $
3,924 $
4,238 $
4,577 $
4,943 $
5,338 $
3,708 $
4,005 $
4,325 $
4,671 $
5,045 $
5,449 $
s,884 $
o,Jcc o
6,864 S
4,532 $
4,895 $
5,286 $
5,709 $
6,166 $
6,6s9 $
7,192 $
7,767 $
8,389 $
Interval Ownership & The Vail Valley
Why not just another condominium project?
The Vail valley has been slipping in the North American ski Industry ratings. one of
the problem areas is the value and quality of accommodations. For all of the reasons
previously stated, the quality ofan interval ownership property tends to be higher, and the
occupancy also offers the community a larger base of business.
However, financially interval ownership also provides a better value to the consumer.
The total cost of vacationing for a one-week stay in the Vail Valley is on the rise. with
room tax and inflation, the average Vail guest can expect to spend over $50,000 dollars
just on accommodations over the next l0 years.
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
10 Year Total'
'10 year tolal is the total dollar amount a guest can expect to pay for one 7 night stay per year
$ 39,036 $ 50,190 $ 61,343 $ 72.496
5,356
5,785
6,248
6,747
7,287
7,870
8,500
9,180
9,914
t3
Over a 1o-year period assuming a 9% tax rate and g% lodging iniation rate.
Value is a concern to our guests and purchasing a higher qualiry accommodation for less
money than they would expect to pay in rent will help satisfo them.
Seasonal Business
The vail valley has come a long way in 30 years toward making this a four-season
resort. However, there still exists a distinct spring and fall season. Because of the
returning frequency ofthe owner and the international exchange network, an interval
ownership property will offer a higher rate ofoccupancy, year round, than either a hotel
or a condominium property.
Location
The average second home is within two hours driving distance of the owner's primary
residence. The vail Valley caters to a larger demographic than just the Front Range of
Colorado. By opening up an opportunity to ownjust the portion ofreal estate that our
guest uses, we are better able to attract owners that would not consider full ownership
because of the distance & time constraints.
l4
Look Who's Talking About
Vacation Ownership
Interval ownership has bceir in the press a lot over the last few years. with the new
found interest by the public and the great improvements being offered by developers,
newspapers and inagazines frorh arorurd the counny have had a lot to report. ARDA '
recently compiled the following list of quotes from around the country. ; ' j
t5
THE-s#aSLI|{
lutY Il. lq98
'rFour million households orvn time-
shares. a number that has more than
doubled since 1990.t'
The Advocate
lutY l). le98
( \Ve're selling an experience.tt
COASTAL
LIVINC
N O V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R I997
((Timeshares are a compelling proposi-
tion for any vacationer who hankers for
the amenities of a resort getaway, com-
bined with the creature comforts of a
luxury second home.t)
Sunday News Journal
AUG U5T 31. !998
( ( Qualit),' of accommodations, good
value. desirability of the timeshare
unit. resort amenities and teatures, and
the abilit_"" to exchange to non-U.S.
resorts \\'ere cited b1'owners as highly*-
rated reasons tor purchasing. t t
tr[errrsd-11
AUC U5T 24. l99i
((The number of Li.S. households own-
ing timeshares has reached 1,767,000,
with a compounded annual growth rate
of 9 percent, according to a study
released b1- the American Resort
Development Association. t t
A FCFTCOJ-NS
UCX-,GADOAI{
AUGUST ',t 0, 1997
( ( Buf ing a couple of weeks' ou'nership
in a condominium or a home is
sounding better and better to people.: t!on Vacauon.' '
Inveetofs Bueine$D
ocToBER l. r997
({More hotel firms have joined the
industry bringing it credibility. Flexible
timeshare packages have made resorts
more attractive to consumers. And
overall, the industry has a better repu-
tation than it did in its earlv davs dur-
ing the '70s.tt
SEPTEMBER 3, 1997
((According to the American Resort
Development Association, 35 percent of
Americans believe they have a 50-50
{(The opportunity to exchanle was
ranked as the most important motiva-
tion for purchasing a tim'eshare by
owners surveveo.' '
llp lletroltlTe$rs aDd .flreilffi
AI' RI L 13. 1997
{(The industry is evolving for con-
sumer demand and timeshare operators
continually seek ways to expand the
number of vacation options. tt
lhrAngeles Gmer
MARCH 25. 1997
((Timeshares are now very very hot.r,
('lt [timeshare] has enjoyed a recent
boost in popularity due to high quality
resorts, increased consumer protection
and a better und.erstanding of the own-
ersnlp concept.' '
freOrlando Senfinel
lu LY 16 1ee7
({Timeshare owners to receive tax
break.tt
APRIL l-+ lc)q;
((Part of the appeal is the souped-up
qualiqv and the more desirable
locations. t t
MAY 7. tq9;
'(Sales of timeshare units in Florida in
1996 totaled $817 rnillion: 52 percent
more than in 1992, the last time indus-
try sales were measured in the state.tt
@nosftgtordrnes
luLY 25, leeT
((Timesharing, often found with beach-
front property, allows businesses and
individuals to cut purchasing costs by
pooling money througlh a management
company."
EL FINAIICIEROo
luNE 9. r997
((Timeshare market recovers despite, ttarecesslon.''
Travel 50 & Beyond
luN E-AUCUST le97
((Timeshare ownership, an industry.
growing by leaps and bounds and show-
ing no sign of slowing. You can v'aca-
tion in some of the world's most desir-
able places for the rest ofyour life.tt
((Baby boomers fuel growth of time-
share opportunities . . . the industry
enjoyed a 25 percent increase in sales
in 1997, with total sales of $2.72 billion
in the U.S.tt
Ocean Drive
JANUARY I998
((The timeshare experience is here to
stay. . . . Timeshares are particularly
suited for families or those who like to
vacation in groups.tt
HordA]ilmelffi
NOVEMBER I6, I998dFr[Inres
MARCH 30. 1997
- chance of owninq a second home with-
ffiiiffi:=ffi
Patriot Ledser I Houston chroni"EDECE,vBER .)7. tq97
DECEMBER 2(,. 1997
d(Timeshares are better bargains than
buying condos for short-terir use.tt
Eos Angeles @imes
types of.prognms arailable so buy.ers are &cfrn3i4o
betterable to match their needs'" ud0n-Uttbune
MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTTNEL
luNE t. t997
6(Better known as timesharing the
interval form of vacation ownership
allows you to buy a piece of a fully-fur-
nished place for only a percentage of the
cost of full ownership . . . . Variety is the
name of the game, and there are sevenl
'(The timeshare industry is making a
comeback from '80s blaik eve.tt
Drnver Rocky Mountain News
MARCH 15, t99E
{(Major hotel chains are jumping on
the timeshare bandwagon.:
Inrreetode BudneeeDaff
TEBRUARY I7, I996
((Timeshare deals are getting better.
Travelers can find flexible schedules.
prices and more fun.ll
Southern Liyilg_
"^-ct rr9E
{(Timeshare ownership has increased
nearly 900 percent since 1980.tt
Sen ^frrencisro Bsominer
MAY 30. t997
((Some hotel experts say the urban
timeshare industry is on the rise.tt
News Gaurd
MAY 28. 1997
'{Travel dreams come true with time-
share exchanges.tt
P@s
,uNE r5. te96
6 ( Developers are tailoring timeshares
to suit wide economic spectrum,t,
MAY 18. t997
6(Florida's timeshare industrv is
booming.tt
Barter News
The Vail Trail
MA\ 2-8. teq;
((The big players in the hospitalig'indus-
try are rolling out the vacation ownershir
red carpet. The;-'ve helped polish time-
share s tamished image. Ou'ners take a
great deal of pride in their units, and
there is a real sense of ownership.lt
. AUcUSTTIO. tqqi
r'They're Itimeshares] a lifestyle
lnvestment.' '
Lodging Hospitality
AUGUST I997
(('llmeshares set sights on cities. Urban
timeshares are growing in popularity.rt
luLY 29. 1997
((Nationwide, timeshare sales have
soared 900 percent since 1980 and are
the fastest growing segment of the
travel and tourism industry. tt
Hawaii Business
I u LY l9 9 7
((Today's prohibitive real estate prices
have made timeshares more attractive
to a broader market in comparison to
condominiums.ll
TEE KANSAS CITY STAR.
f uNE r5. l9e7
(dNever before have Americans been so
optimistic about their chances of own-
ing a vacation home. Thirty-five per-
cent of all U.S. households feel they
have a better than ever chance ofbuv-
ing recreational property. t t
luNE 19. re97
(( Hawaii's timeshare industry attracts
292.000 visitors a year who spend $370
million in the state, according to the
American Resort Development
fusociation.tl
:ffii
'the.U.$..t:, j
Scottsdale Progress
Tlibune -
@hc @larwn-!fidgec
APRI L r3, rt-97
(6The vast change in the American
vacation lifestyle over the last 25 years
has had a profound effect on the time-
share markellt
Senior World of San
Diego
JULY 1997
((Timeshares appear to be excellent
alternatives to owning a vacation home,
which is why the industry prefers the
moniker lacation ownership' to'time-
share'.tl
luNE-tuLY 19 97
'dovming a piece of a vacation provides
consumers a.hedge atainst cost, time,
anq trouble."
Business Monday
luNE 2r. 1997
6 (Timeshare properties growing and
gaininq,respect of industry and
puDlrc."
t7
l{alamazoo G azeftO $ar^fltuancisro e*minp ItErrc a Rncuo
luLY li tqei
6'A home away tiom home - a time-
sharing venture turns into vacations all
over the world."
tI,-D.gtf $R!$nilffi**r*,:r+._
MAY 28. te9;
J(Timeshare: A nar.for visitors to own
a home. "
Sun
AUGUST I. I997
"Robust sales fuel timeshare boom.t!
@he Gnlumbus Dirpatch
DECtMsER 18. 1997
({satisfaction rates among Florida's
ttmeshare owners have soared, as 90
percent report being satisfied with the
services. amenities, facilities and
upkeep of their resorts and units. The
abilitl' to use the vacation exchange
option is cited b1'Florida owners as the
pnmary motivation to purchase, and
73.9 percent state they have saved or
expect to save monev on vacations
through ownership.tt
NLlvtMBtR 12. 1997
((The industry is attractive to Wall
Street's investment bankers and bro-
kerage houses for a number of reasons.
Compounded growth rate of the indus-
try has historically been and continues
to be 15 to 20 percent a year. In com-
parison to the hotel industry, which
until recently has been growing at I toI percent a year, this ongoing expan_
sron exptalns the attractiveness of time-
sharing to major brand names and
institutional investors. I I
NOVEM I ER 22. r998
{(Timesharing grows up along with the
boomers.... Aging baby boomers see
their value. This is a crowd that is real
estate sawy, likes to use data-bases.
wants flexibility in vacation plannin!
and likes making creative investments.
Timeshares meet all of these tests....
And for the busy baby boomers who
want certainty in all aspects of their
lives, timeshares may be the answer.ll
Inner-City Express
NOVEMBER 27, 1998
DECEMETR ;. Iqq;
((Forget the horror stories - inten,al
ownership is more than it s cracked up
to be. It has policed itself and norv
enjoys a good reputation among tens or
thousands of tourists rvorldrvideL t t
The PaIm Beach Post
NOVEMBER q I997
((lt's.like a piece of Florida wjithout the
hassles ofactually buying ieal estate.l,
{gtnflctbUws
NOVEMBER 2. 1997
({The mass appeal of the timeshare for
visitors is being able to own property,
but at a reasonable price. Raihe; th;;
purchasing a six-figure condo that sits
empty for most of the year, timeshare
owners buy time in a unit for a fraction
of the price.tt
et roSER 5. t997
((Fractional ownership has whole ben-elr6. l.rmes have changed and the con-
cept 0f fractional ownership has spear-
headed that change.tt
SEPTEMEER I998
((We figured we could break even with-in three to four years, considerinE wego out West to ski twice a vear.ll-
TIIE TAMPATRIEIJIIEdtufl[.!|r!q!,t'SKITNG
NOVEMB E R 2. 1997
((There are millions of happy owners.
Othen'rrise, it wouldn't grow.ll
Garden Island
NOVEMB I R I9, 1997
6(More and more consumers are reject-
ing the theory that only the upper ilass
can afford a second home.ll - -
lutY 20. teeS
((lndustry studies indicate. that con-
sumer acceptance has never been high_
er for timeshares. The demand far orit
paces the supply and the trend ruill
continue in the foreseeable future. t t
The Jewish Journal '
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
l8
February 3, 1999
George Ruther, AICP
Senior Planner, Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Mariott lettol datod January 28, 1999
Dear George,
In response to your letter and subsequent to our meeting this morning, I would like to offer
the following response to your letter of January 28, 1999.
1. Fourteen foot clearance into the new Gore Creek Club would be nice, but it is not
possible given the height restrictions, I also do not think the existing parking structure
deck will support a large emergency vehicle and really do not think bringing one onto
the deck is a good idea. We are going to try to provide approximately 11'-O" clearance
at the entry so we can accommodate Fed-Ex and UPS trucks. Per our discussion this
morning, we will instead provide a command center closer to the street at the
northeast corner of the new building retail so emergency vehicles do not have to go
into the Club yet can pull off of Lionshead Circle.
2. Engineer's report is attached hereto. I do not know if the engineer's recommendations
were executed.
3. Code does indeed require a second means of egress from the converted Windows
spaces. lt was inadvertently removed from the plans. lt is a code requirement and will
be shown on the next generation of plans submitted.
4. I have been informed that all wings of the existing hotel are fully sprinklered and have
been recently judged by an independent testing agency to comply with the codes listed
in your memo. lf the Town has a problem with the system, then you should contact
the Manager directly. Any problems should be addressed under the 1995 Certificate of
Occupancy and should not be a condition for the new proposed work. We were not
the Architect of record for that work and are not able to be of much help in this
matter.
5. Parking structure will have to be mechanically ventilated. lt is too soon to say where
the exhaust vents will be but they will be inconspicuous.
George Ruther
February 3, 1999
Page 2
6, lt is understood that backing of delivery vehicles onto West Lionshead Circle for the
new Phase lll building is prohibited. As discussed this morning, there is not much to
be done to avoid that situation at the existing north and west loading docks.
7. Code required minimum parapet height is 3O", not 42". And actually, we do not think
that parapets will be required at our new building. I understand your concern is due to
the possible presence of roof-top equipment. lf we end up with such equipment, we
can provide guardrails 42" in height if so required by code. As such these are not
governed by height restrictions and will not affect mass and bulk. In any case, if we
eliminate the parapets currently shown, overall height of the building will not be
reduced but the spare 30" of height will be used at the entry,
8. Existing loading docks at the west and north sides of the existing hotels cannot be
relocated. Based on our discussions this morning, we will submit a plan showing what
improvements can be made at the north dock area.
9. Streetscape improvements, as defined by sidewalks on the drawings submitted shall
extend from the Antlers property line to the curb cut at the West Day Lot. Beyond
that point, I think a short asphalt walk connecting to the asphalt bike path along the
Frontage Road may be possible,
10. The landscape design for the stream-side yard of the Marriott is still being developed
and discussed by Marriott. There will be improvements made but I cannot define them
at this time. The drawings we originally submitted were rejected by Marriott after our
submittal, As discussed this morning, we will submit a "base plan" for this area early
next week. Also as discussed, we will look into including "simple revegitation" of the
stream bank south of the bike path (l would note that this is not a PEC issue and
should be addressed at our DRB hearing).
1 1. An updated survey will be provided in the future. We are also working on a new soils
report.
12. Loading and delivery at southeast may go away since we are looking at relocating the
existing ski shop to somewhere closer to Lionshead Circle.
13. As we discussed this morning and as mentioned above, we do not anticipate any
occasions where loading and delivery from the street will be necessary at the new
building.
14. Working on it. See proposed north loading modifications plan when submitted.
15. Providing a turn lane on the frontage road is a disincentive to our project, Unlike the
Village Inn project and unlike the Marriott SDD submittal in 199O. we are proposing to
spend an extraordinary amount of money on the facelift at the existing hotel (our
impact fee). We also have a problem with the spending of money to improve a section
of the Frontage Road that may be abandoned in the near future. As discussed this
morning, we thank you for putting the issue on the table now, but we cannot accept
any additional impact assessments at this time.
16. A pedestrian path meeting the requirements of the ADA will be included in the
landscape design.
17 . Drainage easements will be platted or recorded as appropriate and as necessary.
George Ruther
February 3, 1999
Page 3
18. Not likely. lf you want to force public art on private property, then I suggest that you
set up a foundation to provide the funds necessary. Based on your definition this
morning of public art as benches and trees etc, we may be able to make some token
gestures.
19. Yes. In most cases however, our new roofs are so steep that we do not anticipate
their holding much snow.
20. Will be on next drawing submittal.
21 . Done.
22. In progress. Discussions were held and verbal approval received from Dave Corbin.
We are aware of the issue and started working on it a while back.
George, I appreciate you and Greg meeting with us this morning and I hope that we have
reduced your list to a negligible number of items. One last item not on your list (l plan to
revise the December 12 overview letter accordingly) concerns EHU's. East West Partners,
based on a recently completed project up in Beaver Creek, is comfortable stating that only
25 new employees will be necessary for the new building (this includes housekeeping and
engineeringl. At a ratio of ZOoh, this translates into 5 EHU's. Also, as discussed this
morning, we are looking at alternate locations (still on site) for these units.
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY PRATT SCHULTZ ARCHITECTS. P.C.[:/ffi-
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
TOWI\I OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
January 28, 1999
Henry Pratt
Gwathmey/PratVSchultz Architects, P.C.
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Maniot Redevelopment and the Gore Creek Club Proposal
2.
J.
/l
J.
6.
8.
9.
10.
I l.
12.
Dear Henry,
I have received the submittal prepared by your office for the proposed Maniot Redevelopment and the
Gore Creek Club. Upon completing a preliminary review of the proposal there are several issues which
need to be addressed. The purpose ofthis letter is to provide you with a list of issues which must be
ad&essed prior to appearing before the Planning & Environmental Commission.
Please ad&ess each of the following issues:
l. A minimum ofa 14 foot overhead clearance is needed at the entrance to the Gore Creek Club to insure
adequate emergency vehicle access.
Please provide an engineer's report on the load capacity ofthe top deck of the parking structure.
A secondary means ofegress is required to be provided out of the proposed condominiums at the
present location of "windows".
The existing hotel will need to be fully retro-sprinklered to comply with the UFC and UBC.
Please indicate on the proposed plans the ventilation system for the parking structue.
Backing of delivery vehicles out onto West Lionshead Circle is prohibited.
The minimum height of the roof parapet shall be a minimum of 42" in height.
Please revise and improve the loading and delivery areas localed on the north and west sides of the
existing hotel. The current configuration creates conflicts with pedestrian and vehicular flow along
West Lionshead Circle.
The streetscape improvements recommended in the Lionshead Master Plan shall be implemented from
the east property line adjacent to Antler's, to the South Frontage Road.
Streambank improvements shall be implemented along that portion of the stream adjacent the Maniot.
An updated survey with drainage improvements shown is required.
The loading and delivery area at the southeast comer of the existing building needs to be eliminated to
reduce traffic c onfl icts.
13. There shall be no loading and delivery from the public right ofway.
14. All existing and proposed loading and delivery areas shall be screened and enclosed where possible.
15. A left tum lane shall be required for west bound traffic on the South Frontage Road.
i 6. Please provide a pedestrian connection to the bike path and the steam conidor.
17. Drainage easements may be required to be platted. A determination will be made once the updated
survey is submitted-
18. Please contact Nancy Sweeney, Art in Public Places Coordinator, to discuss the possibility of
incorporating some form of public art into the project.
19. Snow guards are required on the existing and proposed buildings to prevent hazards to pedestrian on
the sidewalks.
{p*"'"o""*
20. Please review the nmthwest comer of the proposed building to reduce the mass of the buil.ling to
conply witb tbe 35' nrodmum unbroken plane recormnendation of the Uoshead lvlaster Plan.
21. Please label the roof pitch of the poposed building on the plans.
22. Pleasc provide a wrinen lettq of appoval from the Vail Associates granting tbeir permissim to allov
you to gade across the comrnon poperty line.
A final review oftbe poposed redevelopment is tentatively scheduled for Monday, Fehuary 22, In order
to rermin on the February 22 agenda, all of tbe isures identified above must be resolved by no later than
noon" Thtusday, February 4. Ifyou re unable to npet this deadline, please contact me at yqr earliest
couvenience so we may discuss a possible altemate schedule.
Sincereln
l1+1,t*'t
George Ruthu,AICP
Scnior Plmner
Toum of Vail
Xc: Greg llall, Actiog Directu of Public Works
FIL T coPyVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
- TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1999
2:00 p.M. AT TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
NOTE: Tlme of ltems are approximate, subject to change, and cannot be relie{upon to determine at what ilme Council wiliconsider ai iiem.
1' A joint work session meeting discussion with the Town councilGeorge Ruther ano tne planning a gnviionmentar commission to discuss theTom Braun proposed amenrments to tne puotc Accommodation ZoneDistrict. (45 mins.)
ACTTON REQUESTED OF COUNCTL: Engage in a discussionwith the applicant, staff, and planning & En-viionmentatcommission regarding amendments to the pubric Accommodation
Zone. Districtdevelopment standards and provide input anddirection on the subject.
BACKGROUND RATIONA|E, On December 146, the planning &Environmentar commission herd a work session to discussamendments to the deveropment standards prescribed for thePubric Accommodation Zone District. rn oisdussing the subject,the commission members requested a joint work session with theTown Council to discuss the subject in lreater Aetait. fnecommission strongry berieved th-at poric-y direction was neededfrom the councir in order to proceed in dre most effective andefficient means possible.
A ggpY_glJhe applicant's report to the pEC, the staff memorandumto the pEC and the December 14h meeting minutes have beenattached for reference.
srAFF REGOMMENDATT'N: Staff wourd recommend that theCouncil provide policy direction to the appticant, staff and pEC
with regard to the proposed amendmenis.
\ - A joint work session meeting with the Town councir and theGeorge Ruther pranning a gnvironmentar commission to oiscuss ihe proposedHenry Pratt redeve6pment ot uraiiiotrs Mountain Resort at vair. (4s mins.)
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: Engage in a discussionwith the applicant, staff and ihe planning dE-nvironmental
Commission regarding a major amendmr-ent to Specialuevefopment District #7 and provide the staff and applicant withdirection and input on the redevelopment of the hotel.
BACKGROUND RATTONALE: The applicant, Maniott,s Mountain
T":g.rt a! Vgit, represented by Henry Fiatt ot bwathmey, pratt
+phl!:!, is proposins.a redlvetopment of rhl existinj notet.
I ne purpose of the work session meeting is to allow thE applicantan opportunity to present the proposed redevelopment to thevarious Town boards and for the Town to provide diiection to theapplicant on various aspects of the redevelopment project.
Please see the attached staff memorandum dated 1l12tg9torfurther details.
STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: Staff recommends that the Councilprwide policy direction to the applicant, staff and peC witf,ieg;iJto the proposed hotel redevelopment.
PEC/DRB Review. (15 mins.)
Discussion of CARTS Funding for 1999. (10 mins.)
Ford Park Managed parking. (30 mins.)
BACKGROUND: Staff has provided a detailed memo containinobackground and information Councit ;quesil '5i;;;;;;;;"",
reconvene the Ford park Managed parking Committee untilCouncil makes a decision re: prLvious pofiiy staiements it hasapproved as a part of the Ford park M;stef'plan.
ITAFF REeUEST: Reconfirm or modify the Ford park MasterPlan re: how Council wishes to proceed w7sur."r,9g parkingissues at Ford park.
6. lnformation Update. (10 mins.)
7. CouncilReports. (10 mins.)
8. Other. (10 mins.)
9. Executive Session _ Negotiations. (30 mins.)
10. Adjournment _ S:25 p.m.
NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW:(ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE NruO SUTiJECi i6irrNruCEI
THE NEXTVATL TOWN CdulC-rfnEclur-ln woRK SEsstoNwrLL BE ON TUESDAY,ltlstss, eeorNNrNb nr i:00 p:i;. ,ili6i E-ourucn- GHAMBERS.
. THE FOLLOWNG VAIL TOWN COUN-CIL REGULAR WORK SESSIONwrLL BE ON TUESDAY,1t26tss, eeorNHrNb er i,od-p.til.lN iSiiiiur.rcrl cHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETINGwLL BE oN TUESDAY, 1/1e/ee, eeerNNi-tG ar z:00 C.irJirlciirliiuruclL cHAMBERS.
sign language interpretation available upon req-uest-wiin?+15ur notification. please call 479_2332 voice or 429-2356 TDD for intormition. - ----' "
3.
George Ruther
4.
5.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: January 12,1999
SUBJECT: Joint worksession discussion of the proposed redevelopment of Marriot's Mountain
at Resort Vail
The purpose of today's joint worksession meeting with the Planning & Environmental Commission
is for the Council and Commission to engage in a discussion with the applicant regarding the
proposed redevelopment of the Marriot. The applicant is most interested in receiving input and
direction from the Town relative to mass and scale of he project.
To facilitate the discussion. stalf would recommend that the Council and Commission discuss the
following issues:
r Mass and scale of the proposed project.
r The creation and designation of a "landmark'feature.
r Loading/delivery accommodations.
r Employee housing requirement.
While this is only a worksession discussion, staff has had an opportunity to complete a preliminary
review of the applicant's proposal. Upon completion of our review, statf feels that the project is in
general compliance with the newly adopted Lionshead Master Plan. A more complete and
thorough review will be complete once a formal application is submitted to the Community
Development Department.
Jan O8 99 O1:36p
January8, 19gg
t"ot"
l{ccauseg
f476-1s1e
p.2
,ii iili
1l-
i:
''li! I
:
George Buther
fgwn ot Vail Gommunity Development
Vdl, Cotorado 81657
Rc: pre'appf,c'don confe*nco with rown Gounc[ and FEc on Marffultt
Dee Mr. Ruther,
As requested, I am sr.rbmittirrg t{ris lottel outlinhg our expecrations for the January l2n pre-application mooting on the Mariott facelift *a ioiti*. I uMerstard this is the first suchmecting wer and that you will be o<plaining to everyone why this new apprurach is beingll"d' t think this is very importanr, ;ince liaffiott and East west partners tre anxious thatthe approval proc€ss for this project be
"ur"
to p."r"o as smoothry and quickry as possible.
Our oxpectetions ala quite simple: linal and uncorditonat approvall
Actualv, we are looking for a consonsus frorn the council and the pEc that what we ara
Itopgo'.ns mes$ the spilit and intent of the Lionshead Master plan and that we can initiatethe review process witrr this design. rt i" a"o ,"w important to know whether ths scab andma*ring proposed wall be acceptable.
I intend to keep our pr6entation brief in order to leave time lor questions an<l disotlsEion ofany oonoems that may arise.
Sincerely,
JFI'F22-1999 1l : A9 NFRRIOTT CMP.
PLICATIOIY FOR PI"AiII{INC
^ND
ENVIRONMENTAL
r
**..$;#"il",,' ;f;T,r
colfr4tsroN APPRoVAL
pJml0F
This rypliaim ir for my projoct rtquirirg rlprovel by ths Phnniog rnd Eovironmcntll Corrniaior. For spcific
rppficdior crn rnt lr
ec*plcd urlil rll roguircd informtioo is rubmincd, Tlrc pojcct nny ebo accA o bc@
A:' TYPEOFAFPUCATTOD.I:tr Additioilt GRFAO50)E lcdrdtlcrlfls-O CmditiooltlrcPcmir
E- Mrj*o;-C}l{imr$terHctD RcconlngB Sicnvrir:cO VdrrcA Zc*6€odefona&mrr
bytbcTerCureil
B Arrurdnurt ro ar Agpovcd Dcrclopnrart Plur
Et eryhycsthsiryUrfi (I'?c:_)D Mrjora tr MiacCrCt ErrcricrAlraitim
firtrvilrgcfO Mrjor * D Minor €ll Ertsior Alcnlioo
(Eioadtcd)
D Sncciil Dryslonnrnr DirrictE M1p or tr t{lrorArrurdmar ro rr SDD
Aqbt
cF:rrhrAr"
LIX;A1ION oF PnOFOSAL: LOT_BL()CK_ FILINC
--_
ADDR5S&. Tl+. tFN$llAb elEeL.€ guLDFKTN Me lArU rnspsJ HT'er
D.
E.
F.
G.
{AMEOFOwNEf,(S):
MAILII{G
NAbiEOf TEPTESENTA Ew Wesrir fLsroADDREttf;
H.FEt - gEE flB STTBM|ITAL R!QU|REMENn| FOR fiE ApSsOpnrATE EEE
Er'l ilrr rms AttucATroN, AtI, gIrB}|rrrALrEQI[nErGrlSAlD flr8 tDE TO rl|EDla|tmcnrorcomnmwDEvErr?MENi, is SOuln-rn6Nilci norD,vAtlrcotonADott6tr.
,tuagr
TT]TH- P.O2
Qucstioqg] Call rhc Planning Sraff at 479.21j8
LICATION FOR PI,ANNING AbVI RONMENTAL
COMMISSION APPROVAL
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring approval by thc Plurning and Environmcntat Commission. For spccific
information. scc the submittal requircmcnts for thc particul.r approval that is rcquestcd. Thc application can not bc
accepted until all roquired information is submined. Thc project may also nced to bc rcviewcd Ly thc Town Councit
and/or thc Dcsign Rwicw Board.
A: TYPEOFAPPLICATION:
. U Additional GRFA (250)tr Bed and Brcaldast
}( Conditional Usc Pernrittr Major or E Minor Subdivisiontr Rezoningtr Sign Variancctr Variancctr Zoning CodcAmendmcnt
tr Amcndmcnt to an Approvcd Dcvclopmort Plantr Employcc Housing Unit (Iypc: )tl Major or E Minor CCI Extcrior Atteration
(VailVillagc)
tr Major or tr Minor CCII ExtcriorAltcration
(Lionshcad)
Spccial Dcvelopmcnt Distsict
Major or El Minor Amcn&ncnt to an SDD
DESCRTPTTONOFTHEREQLEST: J; Au-o\ / TtMg-3H42€ tN ttDMF
ZoxrrJq Ar peopmeD pnegE /,1 A>orlor..l zo mneuro.lT- ldL'o^tg{eeb:
C. LOCATIONOFPROPOSAL: LOT_BLOCTL_FILING_
ADDRESS 13 W. Uort:>!+ab dFCLEBUtLDTNcNAME:
ZONING:
NAME oF owNER($: FIMC CogPaRAno^J Arnl : JEFF ME-GerrE-
MAILING
owNER(S) STGNATURE(S):
NAMEOFREPRESENTeTTE' cHUCr( MeDrsor.l e/o ElSr w T PA
tr
tr
Ef,er
D.
E.
F.
G.
IVTATLTNGADDRESS: ,oo E. TN0MA6 FrAC€ . rO. DpAh/68 Z?4o
AvoA, cn Ab?t
FEE - SEE THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPROPRI.ATE FEE.
SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE T'EE TO THE
DEPARTMENT oF COMMIJNITY DEVELOPMEM,75 soUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAIL,COLOMDO E1657.
9DD
Application Datc:_ pEC Mccting Date:_-....._,,__
R!ili$d 586
qu.r,io.$l thc pli,::r:i'g stalr a'i 4 ; t-: l1s
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
?fLf of al' 66L8
GENERAL INFORMATION
This application is for any projcct rcquiring Dcsign Rcvicw approval. Any project rcquiring dcsign review must
rcccivc Design Review approval prior to submitting for a building pcrmit. For specific information, see the submittal
rcquircmcnts for thc particular approval that is rcquested. Thc application cannot bc acceptcd until all thc requircd
infornration is submittcd. The projcct may also nccd to bc rcvicwcd by thc Town Council and/or thc Planning and
Environmcntal Conrnrission. Dcsign Review Board approval cxpires one ycar after final approval unlcss a
building permit is issued and construction is startcd.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST:DEts APPEO/AL rcE FACE- L]FT AT
TAWN0FVAtt
B.
C.
D.
E.
PFTYSICAL ADDRESS:
PARCEL #;
F.
G.
H. TYPE OFREVIEWAND FEE:
tr Ncw Construction - $200 Construction ofa new buildins.
tr Addition -
E Minor dtcration -
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT: BLOCK:-FILING:
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessors Office at 970-328-8640 for parcel #)
ZoNTNG: aDD /mleerorf\ -op- tro^'3*elp zorlrvrs
NAME oF owNERtS): llMC Mec
OWNER(S) SIGNATURE(S):
NAME OFAPPLICANT:
MAILINC ADDRESS: IOo g .rA/EE
AWN, C.o Slto?e PHoNE: F45'qln
$50 Includcs any addition whcre square footagc is added to any rcsidential or
comrncrcial building.
$20 Includes minor changes to buildinp and site improvements. such as,
rcmofing. painting. window additions. landscaping. fences and retaining
walls. etc.
DRB fces are to be paid at the timc of submittal. Latcr. whcn applying for a building permit. pleasc idendry
thc accurate valuation of the project. Thc Town of Vait will adjust the fce according to the project valuation.
PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD,
VAIL, COLORADO 81657.
MAILINC ADDRESS:
,t.
ADJACENT LAI\IDOW\ERS
Rob Levine
Antlers Association
680 W. Lionshead Circle.
Vail, Colorado 81657
Geotrrey Wright, Destination Resorts
Enzian Association
610 W. Lionshead Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
DawnMcKenna
LionSquare North
660 W. Lionshead Pl.
Vail, Colorado 81657
Montaneros Association
Attn: Dawn
641 W. Lionshead Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
Lenra Hauser
Vail Spa Association
710 W. Lionshead Circle
Vail, Colorado 81657
Vail Corporation
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
The TownofVail
74 South Frontage Road West
Vail" Colorado 81657
i
ITEM MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPERW
PUBLIC NOTICE
i
THIS
NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Municipal Code of the' Town of Vail on February 22,1999, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In
consideration of:
A request for a rezoning of property located in the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Area,
in accordance with the attached map to a new zone district entitled Lionshead Mixed Use
District 1 and Lionshead Mixed Use District 2 District, (including, Vail International, Lodge at
Lionshead-Phases l-lll, Tree Tops, Lionshead Center, Lionshead Arcade, Vail 21, Lion's Pride- Building, Vantage Point, Lifthouse Condominiums, Westwinds, Sunbird Lodge, Gondola
Building, Landmark Condominiums, Landmark Townhomes, North Day Lot, Lionsquare Lodge,
Lionsquare North, Montaneros, Concert Hall Plaza, Antlers, Marriott, Enzian, Vail Glo Lodge,
Lionshead Inn, Vail Spa, West Day Lot, VA Maintenance Yard and the Amoco Station) and a
rezoning of the Lionshead parking structure from Parking District to General Use .
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for the establishment of new zone districts entitled Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District
and Lionshead Mixed Use 2 District (Title 12, Zoning), in order to implement the Lionshead
Redevelopment Master Plan.
Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a renewal of (and an amendment to) an existing conditional use permit at the
Lionshead Miniature Golf Course, located at a portion of Tract B & D, Vail Lionshead 1- Filing.
Applicant: Charlie AlexanderPlanner: Jeff Hunt
A request for a maior amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Marriott Hotel), to
allow for the construction of the Gore Creek Club and a remodel to the existing hotel, located at
714 Lionshead Circle / Marriott Mark.
Applicant: HMC Acquisition Properties, lnc., represented by East-West PartnersPlanner: George Rulher
A request for a final review of a proposed locker room expansion to-the Dobson lce Arena,
located at 321 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2"" Filing
Applicant: VailRecreationDistrictPlanner: George Ruther
A request for the establishment of Special Development District No. 36, to allow for a
commercial expansion, located at 680 W. Lionshead Place/ Lot 3, Block 1, Lionshead Third
Filing.
Applicant: Antlers Condominium Association, represented by Robert LeVinePlanner: Jeff Hunt
A request for a minor amendment to Special Development District No. 35, Austria Haus, to
amend Section 6 of Ordinance #12, Series of 1 997 to clarify a condition of the Ordinance,
located at242E. Meadow Drive/ Part of Tract C, Block 5D, Vail Village 1$ Filing.
Applicant: Bill Sullivan, representing the Austria Haus Development GroupPlanner: George Ruther
A request for a worksession to discuss an amendment to Special Development District No. 4
(Glen Lyon), revising the Glen Lyon Office Building site (Area D), located at 1000 S. Frontage
Road WesVLot 54, Glen Lyon SuMivision.
Applicant: Glen Lyon Office Building Partnership, represented by Kurt SegerbergPlanner: Dominic Mauriello
A request for a variance lrom Section 12-6D-9 (Site Coverage) of the Town of Vail Municipal
Code, to allow for site coverage in excess of 20o/" and a variance from Section 12-6D-6 (Front
Setbacks) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, to allow for an encroachment into the front
setback on a Primary/Secondary Residential zoned lot, located at 362 Mill Creek Circle / Lot 9,
Block 1, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Walter Forbes, represented by Gwathmey-Pratt Architects
Planner: Allison Ochs
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
Community Development Department
Published February 5, 1998 in the Vail Trail.
JAN-21-se 6s !4s FRoM'LANDIE GUARANTEE
January 20, 1999
euyer/Borrohrer:
Seller/owner:
ProPerEY Address:
If, you have
contact one
For Closing
aay inquiriesof the nunbers
Assistance:
Phone:
FaX:
ID' 197 PAGE 2/II
TO BE DSfERMINED
+{oaf }'4ArzratoTT- L'P BY lr5 qbterz4l'- ?kr'JT}Jtr--
'frc -ecqurgrrroN
PRoPERTTES, rNc', A DBI.,A'ARE
coapon[trou Aosr Mxrzatotr LopW*noil
I.{ARK RBSORT
Our Order No-: V251512
or requ.ire furEher assisEance' please
Iisted below:
For Title .Assistance:
TITLE DEPARTMENT
108 S, FROTITAGE RD W 'vArL, ca 81558phone: 97O +76_2ZSL
Fax:970 476-4531
***r************t*********'(*******:r*********************************
t.IorE:oNcEAl[oRTGINAI,CoMMIII,'IENTIiAsBEENISSI'ED,AlfTSUBSE0UENTlier'riss-wiii-, ee di"rpnasrzm BY IINDBRLTNTNG-
t**********'****r*******x**********:r*t(******************************
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER!
JAN.2t '99 (THu) 08:43 COMMUNICATTON No:6 PACE'
JAN-2r-s9 os,4E FR.M,LAND|" G'ARANTEE'o''"'"|"n
C$ICAGO TITI,E INSUR.ANCE COMPAI\NT
ALTA
- charges -
AIEa Ovrner Policy--TOCAT--
PropoEed Insured:
TO BE DETER}4INED
The estatse or interesE in ehe land
iiii"-c"t*icmenE aod covered herein
A Fee Stuple
4. TiEle to Ehe estate or inEeresL covered herein is ac trbe
"ii.ct'ftt" date hereof westsed i'n:
t['{C ACQUISITION PROPERTIES' INC'' ' '?\ DELAWARE CORPOR'ATION
5- The tanil referred' to in tbis conuniEment is described as
f,oIIows:
PARCBI, 1:
CONDOMTNIUM IODC}E I]NIT' TIIE MARK/I'ODGE IT*Ag99RDAI{CE WI$i Tffi
Ar,{ErrDED DEcLARjaTIoN oF coluDgM-fiiiitM-ron rrrs MARK/LqDGE RECORDED
ocIoBER t7, :|g78 IN BOOK ZZS Jt-peee soe ero MARCE 22' 1979 II{
BOOK 283 It iici SA+ AID tgE
.CONDOTMiNIW IIAP FOR Tffi MARK/LODGE
R.EcoRDED r+anlfr-izl-1s74- rN-BooK ti-s Ar PAGE-930 AND TIrE AMBI'IDED
PLAT OF TIIB ilIrE i'i,ar,r r.on ug-rqanxlloDcE RECoRDED OC:rOBER 17,
1978 rN BwK 2;e ai peen 60?' couvrr oF EAGTE' srATE oF
COLORADO'
PAGE ].
r^N tl 'oo (TI{U) O!;49 COMMUNICATION No:6 PAGE' 3
PAGE 3/TI
COMNII?MENT
SCIIEDIIIrE A
Our Order # VZ6LSLa
1
2.
***TIIISIgNoT.A}IIM/oIcE,BIII_AIIESTIMATEoF-FEEg.9GIENREPERRING
To rllrs oRDER; iiuasn-ierunmlcE oIIR 0RDER No' v261s12
frexr cuecrs pevi;ils'-;o r"Ar,lD,rrt*" GITARANTEE coMPAIiJY ***
ru\zp\qg
EffecEiwe DaEe: MarE:f,?5,-+99€ at 5:00 P'M'
Policy to be issued, and proposed lnsured:
nALTA,n Oitner's Policy lO-L7-92
For Infofination OnlY
MARK RESORT
9310 . o0 (REISSI'B RATE)
$31-0 . oo
clescribed or referred to in
is:3.
JAN-21-se oe.4s FRoM. LANDTE GuARANTEE rD. rs?t:34 PAGE 4/II
PARCEI, 2:
APARToPIgr4,Br.ocKL,vAT\/lJIoNslItAD',TnrRDErLrNGA\IDPART
oF LOTS C .er\iD p, froecds SworvrsroN' TOWN OF Vlltj EAGTJE
coTJNT]r, coLotLADO, miine-pnnflfiIlrARlY DESCRIBED. As FotT.ows :
BEGINNING AT TIIE 'TdNTEWESi CORNER OF LOT C; THENCts AI"ODIG TIIE
tINE COM11ON TO SA||--r,0T C ruO LOTS-A g1TD B; MORCI;S SI1BDIyISION,
SOUIrS 16 DEGRBES]; Mi}fiIIA'ir SECONDS BAST A' DISTANSS OF
399.50 FEET; TrrEx,Ta; noRfl{ ?3 DEGREEa 42 MINIITES 37 SEco}IDs EAST
A DrgrAI,IcE oE z6:;t iiEft T{ENqE-Noirs re DEGREES 17 MrNtlrEs 00
SECONDS WBST A Di;iAI'I-E OF 3.15 FEET; TSENCB ry?RTII 66 DEGREES
24 MINUI"ES OO SEA5ffi-EASr A DTST;NCi OF 210'OO FEET; TIIENCts
NORTII 22 DEGREES]A-;N'IIIrES 41 SECOTIDS WEST A DISTA}TCE OF
140.10 FBET; mEN6E Noirg ?4 DECREEa 2I MlM'ltES 19 SECOIIDS EAST
A DrSTArqcE oF 13;:Ea--F-trr; rrrENcE NORIT{ 06 DEGRBES 34 MTNUTES
15 SECOTIDS WEST n'oisieNci or reo.00 FEET; TIIENCE sourH 83
DEGREES 25 MTNUTB'+s--sEiOb[Di WSSg A DISTiNCE OF 250.43 FEEf, TO
A POINT ON TgE SOrrrrENr.|i-ETEST OF WAY I'INE OF WEST I.|IONSEELD
cIRcr,E; TITENCE Ar,oNa--diu nielrl oF wAY IJINE A DISTAITCE oF
L29.67 rSSr Ar,oNE-fu-ARa oF'e sgz.oo Foor RADTUS ctJRvE TO Tl{E
LEFT AI,ID !{HOSE C T'TTNNL ETIEi'g IS 18 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 10
SBCOIiIDS AND WIIOSE ibNG CSORD SEARS SOIruI 87 DEGFSES 18 MTNUTES
35 SECDNDS WEST ; ;idiAI'ICfbE TZg-08 FEBT TO TIIE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
PARCBT 3:
colrDoMINIIrM IrNrT rros. A THROUGE t, INCr',Uq{P1-.1lP ?HE ITODGE
UNTT TIIB I''ARK RSSOR+ A}ID TENNIS CI.,UB {A CO}qDOMTNIUM) IN
ACCORDAIICE WrrH frE - cilrupor'uNrltM DECr'ARAU ON RECORDED MARCII L4,
1980 IN BOOK 3OO AJ PACS 183, AIID THE COI{DOMINTI'M MAP REC1CRDED
MARCII l.rt, L980 rl'l-Booi ioo er eRes rae', couMrY oF EAGr.,E' STATB
OF COIJORADO-
CEICAGO TITL,B INSURANCS COMPAI'TC
ALTA COMMlTMENT
SCHEDUI,E A
Our Order # V251512
PAGE
r^N- 2t 'gq (THU) O8:44 COMMUNICATION NorS PAC9' 4
,o, '=""},""
INSURANCE COMPANT
PAGE S/II
.ALTA COIi,IMITMENT
SCEEDIILB B-SECTIONI-
1.
(Requirements)orrr Order * V25l-512
2.
3.
4.
5.
JAN-ar-'e ss.4E FR'M'LAND|" .'ARANTEE
CHICAGO TITI.E
(lre lollowlng are uhe requitrenents t'o be complied witrlr:
ICem (a) PalmenE to or f,or the accounts of the gratlLors or
morcgagors of Elre r,rii E""siaeration-ior uhe esuate or interesc
co be insurecl.
rtem (rr) Pf,oper instsrumenE'(s) -creatsing t!e-escate or inEeresB
uo be insured t"il-G olctiuad tta-aoiy filed for record' to-
wits:
Itrem (c) PayBeflE of alt Earces, cfrargies or assessfl€nts levied'
ancl aEaesseo agaiitu-ine surrJilct piE*i="= which are due and
payable'
ttem (d) Add,igionaJ' reguiremenEs' if arry disclosed below;
RET,EiASE OF I',INE CREDTT TRUST PEE)', FEE AND-LBASFISD MORTGAGE', DEBD OF
TRUST, sgguRrr:r ;cREE!4Br-f' rrx11ili irii-lrdsiarelaENT' Assrctrtvlglm oF LEASES
A}ID RENTS E],ID rriiAiICiTIE StATNqENT-DATBb NOVEI'TBER 29 ' ]l'gg4 FROM }IMC
ACQUrSrrroN pRop-ffiiEs, rNc. ' e if;wARe coeBoneriofi to rtE PUBr'rc rRusrEE
oF EAG'E poR THE-il$-oi sANKiR.s-dGC CovrFmw, e-lrew vonx srAt' BANKING
coRpoRATroN, As c5iLersnel AGElrr;';6-s;cuRt rlre quu oF $230'000'000'00
RECORDED DBCEMBE; E7-tgg+ rN BooK 656 'ar PAGE 5ss '
SAIDDEEDoFTRusTI{AsFURTIIBR_gEcuREDBYAS$IGNMENToFIJEASESAISDRET,TTS
RECORDBD Oecemnel-O'i-, :rgi:E, IN BOOK 656 AT PAGE 556'
GooDA}lDsuFFIcIENIDEEDFRoMlitot'NTAINAT,IDIJ.P.,ADEI'AWARBI.,TMITED
pARTNERSHTP To r.o4c ACQUTSTTToN pndp-Bngres' INC., A DELAWSRE CORPORATTON
CAN\TE:TIT.IG SUBJECT PROPBRTY.
NOTE: SAID DBED NEEDD TO CORRECTIJY CON1IEY FARCEI-' 3'
EVIDENCESATISFACToRYToT!4_go{PANctHATTIIETERMS,coNDITIoNSA}.rD
PROVISIOIIS OF d; iO.TTT.T_OT VAII, TRAI.iSTUR TAX IIAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
RELEiASE OF IJISN As EVIDENCED BI rHE STATEMEIT{T oF VORTEX INDUSfR',IBS IN THE
Al4oir$rT oF sr-9, si;.tl-iEEonpsD,r"iy ri, -tigt, rN BooK ?3a Ar PAGE 921'
WARRANTYDEEDFRoMlil,IcAcQuIsITIoNPRoPERTIES,I'Nc./ADEI,AWARE@RPoRLTIoNffi Eo- ;E oETERr,a I-N6D--COlwSf rNe suB,f ECT eRO PERTY .
No|fE:S.AIDDocuMENTMI'STBEgKEcuTEDBYTIIEPRESIDENI,VICE-PRESIDEMIoR
sEcsETARy oF fd"E6i,pbnarros. rr'-iN assisrar.rr VrCE-PRESTDE\II oR AssIsTANr
sBcRETARy nxrcursi--sero oocsMqlT,; AO;;ORA1'E *EsotrmloN MtJsr BE PRoVTDED
To LA![D TrrrJE ei\ruNG-sArD AssrsrAlilT AIxrHoRrzATroN'
PAGE
'99 (TgUl 08:44 C6MMUNICAT!oN No:6 PAOE' I
PAGE A/IItD.19?.'AN
CHICAGO TISLE INSURANCB COMPANS
AI,TA COMMITMENT
SCHEDUIJE B.SECTIONI
!-=
NOTB: EFFECTIVE JAI{UARY t' -Lgg3' clcRPoRATlgyl-ffiAT Do NoT
MLIIITAIN a psirurir.rijm Pr.acE oF-iusrNess rN coIpRADOt A]lD
lror{REsrDEr{T r}ffi;-rDr,ar,i ss:ari6-aup rnusTq ^wIlL BE suBJBCr
TO A COITOBADO'ili;fio-rJDiire ra:< reou rns sAJ,Bs oF cotoRADO
REA' ESTATE rN'-EnAEas oF g1oo,-oiio-.oo-- rrE-IIltfiroLDrNG TNr
wrLL BE nn silaitii-6r-rwo pnncffi'-or TIIE ql!!s PRIcE oR IIIE
NET PROCEEDS r-d:Oil"irM--SET'TS OP CiIE REAIJ ESTATE.
rffi TA:C WIITIT BB WITHIIBLD PY$E TITLB INSURAIICE COMPAI{Y OR
rTs AeErirT no-Euil,riffsD ro rrIE-psFA-RT!,m{"f oq-IqvBlruE, IIHBRE
IT t{rLrJ es cREDii-dD-rc nrs ssLf;i.;s ir,rcoMe TA)( AccoEl[I As A]I
ESTIMAfED rAX-BiffiIgt: -"IE SgI'#'CA]'i CUIM_9IEDIT FOR TTIB
EsTrl,rATED plw-sffi'EaAirwf ug'iNEiir.ls TAx LIABILIT'Y WHEN HE
oR sEE Frr,Es A co6RADo RsruRN FoR TIIE crAR oF TIIE sA!E'
I.FE
(Requiremenes)Our Order # v26t9Lz
4
-2r-ss r",n" "*ot't^onofE ''ARANTEE
NoTE:TIIE$31-0.00PREMIUMSHoV$I-ITEREINIsBAq_ry_oNAToBEDETERMINED
puRgrrAsE pRrcE. Upoir, niiciipr or diE DOilLAR el',rounr 50 BE rNsttRED', sArD
ingl{rilu wrLL C-ITANGE'
NOTE: UPON NOtrIFICATION OF THE BUTER EItrfIf,T' ADDITIOIIAIJ REQUIREMENTS AT'ID
iictgrror,rs D'IAY BE NEcESSARY'
SENATE BrLL eE-045 STATES TE1T EFFECTT\rE .]Ury-B-^l', 1998 TIIE
FEE FoR nporreiri-Fon'-ieffiAsgs oF DEEDs oF TRusr wTLL BB
$16.oo.
PAGE
aa fTt{tll d6:41,COMMUNT CATI ON No:5 PACE. 6
IDt
IN9UR.A}ICE
MMITM
SCHBDUI,E B-SECTION2
(Exceptrions)
PAGE ?/ I \
Our Order # V261,9L2
,""r|"n
COMPAN':T
ENT
of,
b
5
JAN-2r-es os.4Ei FR'M'|LAND + .'ARANTEE
CI{ICAGO TITIJE
AI,T.A' CO
ThepolicyorBoliciesEobeissued.wi].Icontain.exeeptionscothefollowiaE *"ctu"t-'roieEs the sarne are disposed of Eo trhe
saEisfacEion of tbe CornPanY:
1. Righcs or claims of parties in possession noE sho?rn by the
pt;Ofic records.
z. EasefienEs, or claims of easenentrs' nou showrr by the public
records-
3. Discrepaaciee, conftict's iir bo!1$ry f ines'-shortage iD' area'
encroactlnents, anit' arry facts which i correcc surrtey inspection
of Ehe pr"niJ!s-i""la- d,isclose--ana w'nj.ch are noE shottn by tne
pubtic records'
4. Any lien, or tigbts !9 a 11::' for senrices'- lalror or rnaterial
hereEofore or hereafter turnisfriA'-irnposea'by law and noc shown
nY che Prrblic records '
S.DefecEs.l-iensrencunbrance-'adverseclaimsoroE'trermatters'if any, "t""iE&, iirst appearing i* Ebq PPtit records or
actacbing subsequenc eo Ehe eriEcei.te daEe hereof buts prior to
tbe daCe Ene proPosed insur"J""q"itts of record for value the
esEaBe or intlrelt or mortgage tliereon covered by this
Cofifitritment -
6. Ta*es or special asses$neqce which are not shown as exisuing
iiins bY t'he Purrric reconds '
7. Liens f,or unpaid, water and sevter charges' if any'
8. ID addicion, the owner's policy will be subjecu to gbe lien
the new mortsJage' if aay, tto"J'a t"a"t Secti6n 1 of schedule
bereof.
g.RIGHToFPRoPRIEToRoFAVEINoRLoDEToEXTRACEA}IDRgMo\rEIIISoRE
TIIEREFROTI SSOULD TIIB SAIvIE BE F6h'iD rO peNElSATE OR INTERSECilTiIE PREMTSES
AS RESERVED IN ITNITBD STATES PAiEIq'1' RECORDED Vtay 24' 1'go4' IN BOOK 48 AT
PAGE 503 er,iO
-Sueria[BBn +, 1923 rN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98 '
10-RIGIIToFwAYFoR'DITclIEsoRCAI\IaIScoNsTRucTEPBYTITEAIITEoRIIYoFTHE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED TW.iilTTiO_SiETSS PATEMT RECORDED VIAY 24'' 1904' TN
BOOK 48 AT pAGE 503 AND sEpf€x'dER. +'-igzl IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 98'
PAGE
rrrt ^r .
^6
lllljlll noMvllltt dATI ON Na:6 PACE. 7
rD.1s"at34
INSURANCE COMFAI\TY
PAGE A/ I7
AIJIA COMMITMENT
SCSEDULB B-SECTION2
(ExcePLions)orrr Order * V25L5l2
JAN-2r-es osr4? FRoMrto*oQ" GUARANTEE
CIIICAGO TITLE
11. RBSTRrcrIvg covENAIilTS, qlgq-Do NoT coNlAIl'I A FORFEITURE OR REI/ERTER
cr'AusB, BIrr oMiTTrNe iesrRrcri6uG, -rr-errv'--BgED oN RACE/ cor'oR' RELTGToN'
OR NATIOIIA,L ORIGIN, AS CONTAISM_iU INSTRUMM'TT RECORDED OCLObET 15' L97L'
IN BOOK 22L AT PAGE g9r AlD A;-A!4El,iDm rr,r INSTRITMENT RECORDm August 12'
iill, rN BooK zsg AT PAGE 453'
12. trrrr,rry EilsEMBr{I' 20 FEET rN WrDTg, 30 FEET rN_wrDTII AND 40 FBET rN wrDTE rN
THE NoRTH!{Esr PoRTroN oF Lot ;;-tioir r' I-IlEr rN wrDTIr ArroNG THE SourH
IJOT I.INE OF r.OT 4 AI,ID IrOT 5, ;iOC-K-i,'ib FEBT fN WIDTII AJ'OI," THE E,A'ST LOT
LINE OF IJo{t 4, BIJOCK L A}ID A pOniiOrs OF fiIB SOUrIIERLy MOST CORlitR OF I"Ort, 7'
BLOCK 1 A.S S'brni ON TIIE RECORD$-F*' Or VAIIr/ITIONSHEAD, lllIIRD FILIIIG'
13. PEDESSRI.AT{ EASEMENT 15 FEET IN WIDTII AI/ONG EITE SOUfiT IJOT LINB OF IOT 7 '
BI,OCK1.VAIL/LIONSHEAD,TUIND-FiiiIlEESSIIOWNONTHERECORDEDPIjAT'
14.TIIILInTEASEMENIASGR"INrEDToHoI,YcRossEI,ECTRIC.a'ssocIATIoN,INc.IN
INSTRUMETIT REC9RDED April tg,-Gie, iN eOoX Zdg ar PAGE 202 A]ID AUGUST 30'
1982 rlr BOOK 344 AT PAGE 922 '
(AFFECTS ll):l. 1, BIOCK 1 VAIIr/IJIoNSHEAD' TIIIRD FILING Al{D IJOT c MoR',ct''s
SUBDIVISION)
].5. UIITITJ EASEMENT AS GRAI{TE IlO CABI'EVISION ASSOCTATES VI' D/B/L IiERITAGE
cABtg\iISION INC. IN INSTRIIMEI'IT necoRDED May 20, 1983', IN BOOK 360 AT PAGE
42.
16.EAsEMEI\Ilfs,REsERvATIoNs,AIIDBBSTRICTIoNSAssEo}tNoRREssRvEDolilTEE
RECoRDED pr,ai -or vArt/troNsIIEAD FrHIti FTLTNG'
17. UTIIJITT EASBMBI\TT AFFECTING Tffi SOUTI{$TEST'.ERLY PORTION OF IJOT D' I!4ORC{IS
ST'BDIVISION,ASSHOT{IIORRESd[ViDONTITEPIATOFMORCT'SSITBDIVXSXON'
18'TERMS,coNDI?IoNsA}rDPRovrsroNsoFEASEMEIITA}.IDRIGEToFwAYASGF"ATiITEDFo
HoLy cRoss EITESTRIC ASgOCIATiOii, inc. RES9RDED April 19, 1978 M BooK 26e
AT PAGE 202.
]-9. TERIT{S, CONDITIONS A}ID PROVISIONS OF PARNT WAIL AGREEMENT BY AIID BETITEEN T1IE
I4ARK-IJODGE COIOOIATUTUM ASSOCIATION TNC' ' A NOT-FOR-PROFIT COLORADO
COPORATION AI{D M-K CORPORATIdi'i,_A COIORADO CORPORATION RECORDED OCtrObEX L7'
1978 IN BOOK 276 AT PAGE 608.
(AFFECTS PARCELS 1, AbID 3)
20.TERMS,co}IDIrIoNsA}IDPRovISIoNsCoNTATNEDINAGREEI.TENTBYAt{DBET!'IEEN}r.K
CORPORATIoT'I,
-e-
COT,ORADO COnpOmirON AND TIIE IvIARK-IODGB COI|DOMINIUM
ASSOCI:LTION INC. RECORDED OC'iOBER-L7, Ig78 IN BOOK 276 AI PAGE 609'
PAGE
r^rr ar . 60 fTlJltt |\R 'y'.E,46MMUNICATION Nc:6 PACE' 0
JAN-21-9s oe.4? FRoM.LAND + GuARANTEE ,o. r=""}'"n
CSICAGO TITI,E INSIIRANCE COMPA.IFJ
AIJT-n' COMMITMENT
SCTIMULE B.SECTION2
(Exceptions)
PAGB 7
rAal a| OO f?HU) ne:45
PAGE 9/II
Our Order * v26L5L2
(ASPECTS PARCEIJS L -AIID 3)
21-TERMS,co!{DrTIoNsAl{DPRovlsloNsoFGRANTo€pARKINGEASEMENTRECoRDED
ocEober 17, iiie-iN BooR 2?6 iCpace-eio AND AIiIEliDilrBff :rI{ERETo REcoRDm
tgt'i il , L982 rN BooK 343 AT pAGE 467 '
22. TTIOSE PRovrsroNs, covElilAlgfs-^lP coNDrTroNg' EASEMENIS AND RESTRICTIONS'
VEIICH ARE A BURDEN TO TEE C!Ni;6MifiTNA-.I(IT.DESCRIBED IN SCIIBDIILB A' AS
colirtArNgD rN rNgTIilJ!4ENp RECOB;6-u*""n-r+, 1980' rN BOOK 3OO AT PAGE 183'
23. TERMS, Cll[DrrroNs Ar{D PROvIq-roNs oF PARTY ryltf Al[D ENCROACHMBNT ]GREBMENT
By ArrD BETlrEiN-.r;rE--r,rARK RESoRi-'al'TD-TElo,iia cLIIB AssocrArroN, rNc', A
COIJOF,ADO NOT FOR PROFIT CORPOiAfrOT'T_ruUO M-K CORPOR'ilTION' A COLORADO
coRpoR.aTIOrV niionoco ,rlrry zz,-igez IN BOOK 343 AT PAGE 463 '
(AFSECTS PARCETS 2 AITD 3)
24.TERMS.coIiIDITIoNsAbIDPRovTsIoNsoFRECRE.ATIoNAI,AGREEMENTBYA}IDBETWEEN
TrIE M-K coRpoRATION, A coroR;;o-coiponarroN AbID TIIE MARK RESORT Al{D TENNI
cr,uB ASSOCrAfroN, rNc., e corlonno6-c6npoutroN RTcoRDED 'JuIy 27' a982 rN
BOOK 343 AT PAGE 454.
(AFFECTS PARCELS 2'A}ID 3)
25.TIIosEPRovISIoNs,Co\IENANIq.PIDcoNDITIoNg,EA.SEN,IBI{|:PS,Al{DREslRIglIoNs,
WHIGI ARE A iUiiOfurtO fi{E CONDOUiT'TiUU UNI{' DESCRIBED IN SCHEDUI'E A' Ag
coNrArNBD rN rritslRttMENT REcoRDED ocEober fi ' liie ' rN 9o-o5^?L5 AT PAGE 606
.ATID .As A!,TENDED IN INSSRI]MENT ;,NCONPSD T{ATCb'- Zi, TgZg, IN BOOK 283 AT PAGE
344.
(AFFBCTS PARCBL 1)
26. TIIOSE PRO\ruSIONS, COVSNA}rI9 IND CONDITIONS' EASEMENTS AIID RESTRICITIONS',
ltEIgH ARE A BITRDEN TO TIIE COIqgOT'riflfLM I1IIIT DESCRIBED IN SCHEDUI'E A' AS
CoMATNED rw iNSrernasNT RECO66--uaiin r+' 1980, rN BOOK 300 Ar PAGE 183'
(A8FBC-rs PARCET 3)
27. HTISTING LEASES AI'ID TENANCIES
28. EASEMEIITS, RESER\rATIoNS.aND RESTRICTIONS As sgovfN oR RESERVED oN THB
RECORDED coI{DO}4INIilM MAP Or tii-rqan'K RESoRT Al{D TENNIS cLItB CoNDoMINIEMS '
29.EASEMBNIS,RESERIIATIoNSAIIDREsTRIcTIoNsAsSHowNoRRESERVEDoNTIIE
COITDOMINIW UNB FOR TEE MARYTiOOCP AND AI,IEI{DMENTS THERETO'
COMMUNICATTON No:6 PACE' 9
JAN-2I-es os,4" FRoM.LAND+ GUARANTEE rD,ls?oti34 PAGE 7A/ 71
CHTCEGO TITI-,8 INSURANCB COMPA$IT
ALTA COMMITMENf
SCIIEDUI,E B-SECTION2
(E:rcePEions)Our Order # V26L512
30-TERMS,CoIIDITIONSAIIDPROVIsIoNsoFMEMORAIIDI'MOFI'IA!{AGEI\'BNTAGREB',IBIT
RECORDED Sepier$er fe, rggf IN BOOK 562 AT PAGE 255'
31. ENCROACHMENT OF CONG,ETE AI{D POOL ONTCI IITTT'T'TY BASEMENT AS SSOI{N ON
rMpROvEt{ENr toahiioN EsRtrrrcAfr-pRtipanBo JtII'rs 19' ts92 BY INTER-MOUNIAIN
rlbilreenrNo rJTD-, PRorEcr No' 92255 s'
32 - ASPIIALT PAVING AND CONCR,ETE SIDEWALK CROSSNiTG AD'JOINING PROPERS 'AS SSOWN
ON IMPROVEMET'ii; i,OCEiION GRTI;;CiIS PREP}RED 'JIN{E Ig ' L992 BY INTER-
l,romrrarn nre:ilreEnrNe LTD., PRGIECT NO' 92255 S'
PAGE 8
aa ,rrrrr! ^r.zrl< coT IUNICATION Nc:6 PACE. 10
JAN-2r-es os'4El FRoM'LAND+ GuARANTEE rD',ls?o*34 PAGE 7I/II
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
DISCLOSURE STATEME\IT
Reguired bY Senate BilI 9L-L4
A) fhe sulrjecc real propertsy may be located' ia a speeial tsarcing
digtrict.
B) A cefrificaEe of Taxes Due listinE each taxing jurisdieEionE" ;";;;-Ei"itt.a from the county Tieasurer or Lhe counEy
TrLasurer's auEhorized agenc'
C) tlre information regard'-rng special disEricts and the bouadaries
of such ai"ril"Es-ilt-be-"biained from the Board of county
corsdssioBersl-il"-Eir*cy creik and Recorder. or ghe county
Asaeasor-
Required, by Senace BilI 92-143
A) A cercificaEe of Taxes Due lisLing-each t"*i19 jurisdicuion
shall Ue ouEiinEd-il;m the county Treasurer or Ehe counEy
Treasurer's auEhorized agent-
ao ,Tirltl ofl ,46 COMMUNTCATION No:6 PACE' 11
DRarr
April13, 1999
Hery hatt
Gwathmey/PratVschultz Architects, P.C,
1000 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Marriott Redevelopment and the Gore Creek Club hoposal
Dear Henry,
Thank you for meeting with Greg Hall and I to discuss the off-site improvements recommended by the
planning & Enviromnental Commission The purpose of this letter is to summarize the key points and
agreements reached during our discussion
It is the staffs undersunding that HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc., will be responsible for the complete
cost of constructing the following improvements:
1. A minimum 6-foot wide, concrete heated sidewalk along West Lionshead Circle from the cofilmon
property line with the Antler's Condominiums to the sidewalk located along the east side of the
South Frontage Road. The portion of sidewalk from the westernmost property line of the Marriott
to the frontage road sidewalk shall not be required to be heated.
2. The realignment and reconstruction of the cwb, gutter and drainage system, as indicated on the
Approved Development Plan, at the northeast comer of the development site.
3. The construction ofa pedestrian/bike path connecting the Maniott development to the Gore Creek
path.
4. The revegetation and enhancement of the Gore Creek stream bank along the development site
fiontage to the creek. The final improvements shall be reviewed and appoved by tbe Desip
Review Board.
Sincerely,
George Ruther, AICP
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
Xc: Greg Hall, Acting Director of Public Works
?
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FINALAGENDA
Wednesday, April 21, 1999
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIG MEETING SCHEDULE
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce
Melissa Greenauer
SITE VISITS
MEMBERS ABSENT
Hans Woldrich
1 . Vail Interfaith Chapel- 19 Vail Road2. Mariott-715 W. Lionshead Circle3. Grand Traverse - 1800 Lionsridge Loop4. Plala'l-232 E. Meadow Drive
FtlE cuPy
12:00 pm
2:00 pm
Jeff
MEMBERS PRESENT
PUBLIC HEARING. TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 pm
1. Swearing in of new DRB member Melissa Greenauer and reappointed DRB member Bill Pierce
Lorelei Donaldson, Town Clerk.
2. Election of 1999 Ghair - Glark Brittain
1999 Vice-Ghair- Bill Pierce
3. The Marriot (Lionshead) - Conceptual review of a major exterior alteration George
and construction of a new interval ownership club.
715 W. Lionshead Circle / Marriot Mark, Morcus SubdivisionApplicant: HMC Corporation, represented by East-West Partners and Gwathmey-Pratt
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
4. Henkes residence - Conceptual review of a new primary/secondary residence. Allison
2824 Snowberry Drive I Lol17, Block 9, Intermountain.
Applicant: Andrew Henkes, represented by Steven James Riden
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
5. Timber Falls Condominiums - Construction of a new condominium building.
4469 Meadow Drive / Lot 19, Timber Falls Condominiums.Applicant: Bluffs at Timber Falls, LLC
Dominic
MOTION: Bill Pierce
CONSENT APPROVED
SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0
6. Platz'l Bar - Outdoor dining area. George
232 E. Meadow Drive/Part of Tract C, Block 5D, Vail Village 1"r Filing.
Applicant: Johannes Faessler
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0
CONSENTAPPROVED
7. Grand Traverse Lot 16 - Conceptual review of a new single{amily residence. George
1800 Lionsridge Loop / Lot 16, Dauphinais-Moseley Subdivision.Applicant: Dauphinais-Moseley Construction
CONCEPTUAL-NO VOTE
8. Westhaven Club & Lodge - Final review of a proposed new Fractional Fee Club George
and employee housing project.
1325 Westhaven Dr., Westhaven Condominiums/ Cascade Village Area A.Applicant: Gerald L. Wurhmann, represented by Robby RobinsonMOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED UNTIL MAY 5, 1999
9. Vail Interfaith Chapel- Remodel/addition at existing facility. Jeff
19 Vail Road / Lot J, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Vail Religious Foundation, represented by Victor Mark Donaldson Architects
CONCEPTUAL. NO VOTE
Jeff10. Waterhouse residence - New garage.
285 Forest Road/Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1"I.
Applicant: Steve & Linda Waterhouse, represented by Steven Riden
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE:3-0
TABLED UNTIL MAY 5, 1999
11. Shaper residence - Review of a new garage. Jeff
2645 Bald Mountain Road/Lot 10, Block 2, Vail Village 13rn.
Applicant: Steve Shaper
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE: 3-0
TABLED UNTIL MAY 5, 1999
12. Golden Peak Ski Base - Construction of a skier tunnel. Jeff
458 Vail Valley Drive / Tract B, Vail Village 7th Filing.
Applicant: Vail Associates
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Melissa Greenauer VOTE:3-0
TABLED UNTIL MAY 5.1999
Stafl Aoorovals
Slifer Smith & Frampton Vail Associates Real Estate -Awning sign. Brent
143 E. Meadow Drive/Crossroads East.
Applicant: SSFVARE
Rojas residence - Eave/overhang extension. Brent
100 East Meadow Drive, Unit #331l/ail Village Inn Plaza.
Applicant: Alejandro Rojas
Malott residence - Window addition. Brent
770 Potato Patch #sn/ail Potato Patch.
Applicant: Perry & Gail Malott
Perry residence - Additional '15 sq. ft. to existing residence. Allison
758 Potato Patch/Lot 5, Block 2, Potato Patch.
Applicant: Tony and Teri Perry
Precourt - Interior conversion. Allison
328 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 4, Block 1 , Vail Village 1"r.
Applicant: Jay and Molly Precourt
Roost Lodge - Dumpster enclosure. Dominic
1793 N. Frontage Road WesVLots 10-12, Buffehr Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Rodney Cotton
DominicScorpio Condominiums - Revised landscape plan.
131 S. Frontage Road WesULot D-1, Vail Village 2no Filing.
Applicant: ScorpioCondominiumAssociation
Fricker residence - Bay window and room addition. Allison
1370 Sandstone Drive #9/Lot G3, Lions Ridge 2no.
Applicant: Helmut Fricker
Pownell residence - Deck addition to dormer on west side. Jeff
267 Rockledge Road/Parcel C, Resub of lots 14-17, Block 7, Vail Village 1"t.
Applicant: Dick & Mary Pownell
Webb residence - Interior conversion. Brent
1881 Lionsridge Loop #40/Lot 1 , Block 3, Lions Ridge #3.
Applicant: John Webb
Reeman/Randall residence - Exterior deck exoansion. Brent
2865 Snowberry Drive/Lot 2, Block 9, Vail Intermountain.
Applicant: Clive Reeman & Louise Randall
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office
hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75
South Frontage Road.
Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2356,
Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
TOWN OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
MEMORANDUM
To: Town of Vail Design Review Board
From: George Ruther, Senior Planner
Date: April23,1999
Re: April 21, 1999 DRB MeetingNotes
The following is a summary of the comments from the April 21, 1999 meeting of the Desip Review Board with
regard to the proposed redevelopment of the Marriott and the construction of the Gore Creek Club. Please review
the comments and provide any additional information or clarification.
The next step in the review process of the Maniott proposal will be to provide the applicant with a final and
complete tist of the Board's comments. This step is cwrently scheduled for Wednesday, May 5'h.
a
a
a
a
a
a
The site planning of the Gore Creek Club creates a building which is too inclusive and inward facing resulting
in a lack of regard for the public spaces around the building and the existing or potential surrounding uses.
There are opportunities to create a sense of arrival at the entrance portals to the property and building.
The entrances to the property need to be more inviting and less awkward.
The treatrnent of exterior details lacks consistency throughout the project.
The proposed lan&nmk elements are too big and axe not in proportion with the building.
Are the landmark elements necessary?
The basic aspects of site planning such as points of anival, loading/delivery, pedestrian circulation are not
addressed in the cunent proposal.
More attention needs to be given to the sense of anival at the southeast comer of the property.
Why does the height of the building have to increase to achieve the sloping roof forms?
Are the sloping roof forms necessary on the existing hotel?
The application of the sloping roofform on the Phase I building in particulm appears phony and contrived
The steepness of the sloping roof creates a wall rather than a roof.
The stacking of the decks and windows is too repetitive and does not comply with the intent of the Design
Guidelines. The proposal makes it too easy to read the gridlines of the building.
The hotel rooms need to extend outward to fill in the void spaces created in the areas on the sloping roof.
Address fenestration, wall surface planes, and exterior building materials of all the buildings.
There appears to be no relationship between the existing and proposed building and the Gore Creek stream
conidor. A relationship shouid be created.
Phase II of the hotel is intended to become a "flagship" building, yet the proposed exterior building materials
are not of "flagship" quality. The Bavaria Haus is an example ofa "flagship" hotel.
t
t
t
t
t
t
a
t
t
{P'""'*o""*
r The proposed application ofexterior stone makes the building appear to be "dipped" in stone. The height of the
stone around the buildings should varying with massing and building forms in mind.
o The east and west elevations with the exposed parking stuctue is unacceptable. These areas need to be
addressed.
I The building elevation along the west property line is too straight and needs to be articulated, both vertically
and horizontally.
I The space between the commercial use and the main building of the Gore Creek Club is a "no man's land".
Consider comecting the buildings.
I The use of the top ofthe parking structwe does not appear to be verywell thought out.
i Open up a light conidor between the existing hotel and the Gore Creek Club to get light back down to the street
and sidewalk.
The remaining cornments were expressed by members of the public:
a The commercial space on the north side of the Gore Creek Club is too close to the street and should be moved
back to respect the 10 foot s€tback.
r The ridge lines of the improvements should be lowered and a greater space left between the buildings to
maintain the view to the mountain from the Vail Spa.
o The Design Review Board should be allowod to finalize its review prior to the Town Council considering an
amendment to the Special Development District.
r The Vail Spa has requested that photo imagery and an independent urban design consultant review the plan for
compliance with the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan.
t Pedestrian circulation has not been addressed; especially along the sream tract.
t No "sense ofanival to a great place" has been provided.
o The reality ofhow the buildings will function has not been addressed.
t The mass of the roof as proposed and the additional volume it creates is excessive and should be reduced in
scale.
o The Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan Architectural Design Guidelines should be study in great detail to
determine compliance of the proposal with the guidelines.
a The applicant's options are significantly lim.ited given the existing conditions and consraints.
o The north elevations ofthe proposed buildings are atractive.
a The landmark element, while large, is in scale given the size and mass of the existing building.
I Vail Associates as owner of Lot A to the west of the development site does not object to &e proposed west
elevations and building location of the Gore Creek Club.
I Vail Associates is ageeable to working with the applicant on site grading issues.
Please review the cornments as recorded at the meeting and add additional issues as you complete your review of the
full size plans. Again, the goal of the May 5'o meeting will be to finalize the Board's issues and concems and give
the applicant the Board's clear and concise direction. Please rely on the Architectural Desip Guidelines of the
Lionstread Redevelopment Master Plan and the Design Guidelines outlined in the Zoning Regulations when
evaluating the proposal. Wben possible, please cite from the Guidelines indicating how the proposal furthers the
goals ofthe Plan and when the proposal deviates from the Plan.
TOItrN OFVAIL
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
FAX 970-479-2452
::'jc0P'lt
December 11, 1998
Henry Pratt, AIA
Grvathmey, Pratt Architects, P.C.
1000 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Marriot Mountain Resort at Vail
Dear Henry,
The purpose of this letter is to follow-up on our telephone conversation of Wednesday, December 9e with
regard to the redevelopment of the Marriot Mountain Reson at Vail.
As discussed, I have schedr.rled a joint meeting with the Design Review Board, Planning & Environmental
Commission and the Torvn Council on Tuesday, January l2'o at 2:00 p.m.
The purpose of the joint meeting is to present the proposed redevelopment project of the Maniot Mountain
Resort at Vail to the various Town boards and receive any early direction they may have.
In preparation of the joint meeting, please contact me afler the first of the year so we may schedule a time
to sit down and discuss yonr proposal in greater detail.
Ifyou have any questions or concems with regard to the information addressed in this letter, please do not
hesitate to call. You can reach me most easily by telephone at 479-2145.
Good luck with your project.
Sincerely,
*IlJ--+Qvi*a
George Rutbdr, AICP
Senior Planner
Town of Vail
{g *""r"uor "u,
December 2, 1998
Dominic Mauriello
Town of Vail Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Marriott's Mountain Resort at Vail- major amendment to SDD
Dear Dominic,
Subsequent to our pre-application meeting on 1O/19/98, before making a formal application
and accordance with the new policy, we would like to schedule a joint meeting with the
PEC, Town Council and possibly even the DRB as early in January 1999 as possible. As
requested, here is a synopsis of what exists at the hotel and what is being proposed.
Existino Hotel
The existing hotel is comprised of 3 buildings of varying age and construction. We refer to
them as Phase l, Phase ll and Phase lla and the west Parking structure. Uses in the Hotel are
AU, DU, commercial, various food service operations, and convention. For the purposes of
our project, we will address only the uses of AU, DU and one particular restaurant space.
Prints of each building's original design documents are in your archives under different
names. The following information is based on these documents (l would like to point out
that many of the units defined as DU's are owned by the Hotel and are operated as AU's).
The current unit mix is as follows:
Phase AU DU GRFA
74 14 38.380
tl 97 12 48,212
lla 35 27 50,555
Total 206 53 137,147
Lot area (including the parking structure) is approximatelV 222,273 SF. Under PA zoning,
allowable GRFA would be 80% of that or 177,818 SF, Existing GRFA is therefore 77oh ot
allowable.
The "Windows" restaurant, with a seating capacity of approximately 85 seats, is no longer
in operation and is used only for special functions.
Existing parking is located below the buildings and in the west structure. By count, there are
407 spaces with 205 in the west structure. We are assuming that existing parking is
adequate and will be "grandfathered" in as such.
Prooosed New Construction & Ghanoes
1 . Convert the "Windows" restaurant space and 5 adjacent AU's into 3 or 4 DU's.
Parking requirements decrease by 1.6 spaces (85 seats/8 seats per space less 4
spaces (2 units<20OO SF) and 5 spaces (2 units>2O0O SF)).
2. Upgrade exterior appearance of existing hotel buildings by doing the following:
a. Add steeply sloped roofs to lower the eave lines of the various buildings.
Roofing material proposed to be 40 year shadow-line type fiberglass shingles.
b. Add "landmark" roof elements to buildings ll and lla.
c. Remove wood siding at balconies on all buiHings and install new metal railings in
various colors and patterns.
d. Remove most of the existing wood siding and replace with EIFS in several colors.
e. Repaint existing stucco.
f . Existing standing seam metal roofs remain to a large extent,
S. Add new retail spaces with heated sidewalks along West Lionshead Circle at
Phase I and Phase ll when future economic conditions warrant.
h. Remodel existing porte cochere.
3. New Phase lll atop existing west parking structure with interval ownership units in
accordance with the Lionshead Master Plan.
a. 66 new units (see unit mix table below) totaling approximately 75,OOO SF of
GRFA. Current drawings reflect the following unit mix and area:
l[umber Unit tyDe GRFA
50 1O5O SF 2 BR 52.500
12 1450 SF 3 BR (2 BR w/ loft)17,400
4 Studio unhs 2529
72,429
b. Building amenities including front desk and Owner lounges.
c. Addition to parking structure with internal ramps and providing for completely
covered arrival. 61 new parking spaces with an easy additional 15 via valet
positioning.
4. Converting 9 existing DU's in Phase lla into deed restricted EHU's; 8 units are studios
with minimal kitchens and one unit is a one bedroom unit with full kitchen.
5. Modifications to landscape on Gore Creek side of complex including removal of most of
the existing high berm thus opening up to the bike path and the creekscape. One
2.
tennis court to remain, the other one and the volley ball court will go. Other
modifications per the submitted plans.
Proposed total GRFA would be 2O9,576 SF or 1 180,6 of the total allowable on the site. This
is far less than the 25O06 maximum that would govern in Lionshead and even less than the
150% granted the Austria House in the Village.
Gomoliance with Lionshead Master Plan and Desiqn Guidelines- November 17 issue
Existing Buildings:
1. Proposed modifications to roofs comply with the design guidelines even though the
proposed slope exceeds'12l.12; the steeper roofs will lower apparent eaves, balance
roof area with wall area.
2. The proposed "landmark" roof elements will give the western edge of Lionshead the
presence of a "grand old hotel".
3. Proposed streetscape elements do comply with the Plan and guidelines.
New Building:
1. New building is right at maximum height limits with the proposed steeply sloped roofs
and small areas of flat roof. We are well below the roof height average required.
Our proposed 15:12 roof pitch is steeper than the 12:12 specified but again provides
significant aesthetic advantages the satisfy the intent of the guidelines: lower eave
heights and wall heights and a better balance between wall area and roof area. This
aesthetic benefit and addressing of intent is the basis for which we would seek
conditional approval as provided in Section 4.2.8.3. As for the small areas of flat roof,
they are comparable to those found at the Sonnenalp and would be visible only from
high on the mountain. They are also allowed under Section 4.2.8.1 .
The issue of height and flat roofs could be resolved if the datum for measuring height
is set at the top of the existing parking garage instead of at surrounding grade. We
have an unusual case here for new construction in that we do not have the option of
putting the structure completely below grade as could be done with other new
buildings.
I hope this gives you an adequate overview of our project. We look forward to the meeting
with the Council and PEC and a subsequently smooth approval process. We could
reluctantly accept staff approval on this one if required to do so.
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY PRATT ARCHITECTS. P.C.
3.
Henry R. Pratt, AIA
December 2, 1998
February 7, 1999 (revised)
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Re: Maniott's Mountain Resort at Vail- major amendment to SDD
George:
Subseguent to our pre-application meeting on 1O/1 9/98, before making a formal application
and accordance with the new policy, we would like to schedule a joint meeting with the
PEC. Town Council and possibly even the DRB as early in January 1999 as possible. As
requested, here is a synopsis of what exists at the hotel and what is being proposed.
Subsequent to our pre-application hearing on January | 2, | 999, the project remains as
presented except that the location and number of EHU's has been revised.
Existino Hotel
The existing hotel is comprised of 3 buildings of varying age and construction. We refer to
them as Phase l, Phase ll and Phase lla and the west Parking structure. Uses in the Hotel are
AU, DU, commercial, various food service operations, and convention. For the purposes of
our project, we will address only the uses of AU, DU and one particular restaurant space.
Prints of each building's original design documents are in your archives under different
names. The following information is based on these documents (l would like to point out
that many of the units defined as DU's are owned by the Hotel and are operated as AU's).
The current unit mix is as follows:
Phase AU DU GRFA
74 14 38.380
tl 97 12 48,212
lla 35 27 50,555
Total 206 53 137,147
George Ruther
February 7, 1999 (revised from December 2, 1999)
Page 2
Lot area (including the parking structure) is approximately 222,273 SF. Under PA zoning,
alfowabfe GRFA would be 8O% of that or 177,818 SF. Existing GRFA is therefore 77% ot
allowable.
The "Windows" restaurant, with a seating capacity of approximately 85 seats, is no longer
in operation and is used only for special functions.
Existing parking is located below the buildings and in the west structure. By count, there are
4O7 spaces with 205 in the west structure. We are assuming that existing parking is
adequate and will be "grandfathered" in as such.
Prooosed New Construction & Changes
1. Convert the "Windows" restaurant space and 5 adjacent AU's into 3 or 4 DU's.
Parking requirements decrease by 1.6 spaces (85 seats/8 seats per space less 4
spaces (2 units<2OOO SF) and 5 spaces (2 units>20OO SF)).
2. Upgrade exterior appearance of existing hotel buildings by doing the following:
a. Add steeply sloped roofs to lower the eave lines of the various buildings.
Roofing material proposed to be 40 year shadow-line type fiberglass shingles.
b. Add "landmark" roof elements to buibings ll and lla.
c. Remove wood siding at balconies on all buildings and install new metal railings in
various colors and patterns,
d. Remove most of the existing wood siding and replace with EIFS in several colors.
e. Repaint existing stucco.
f. Existing standing seam metal roofs remain to a large extent.
S. Add new retail spaces with heated sidewalks along West Lionshead Circle at
Phase I and Phase ll when future economic conditions warrant.
h, Remodel existing porte cochere.
3. New Phase lll atop existing west parking structure with interval ownership units in
accordance with the Lionshead Master Plan.
a. 66 new units (see unit mix table belowl totaling approximately 75,00O SF of
GRFA, Current drawings reflect the following unit mix and area:
Itlumber Unh tvDe GRFA
50 1O5O SF 2 BR 52,500
12 1450 SF 3 BR {2 BR w/ loft}17,400
4 Studio units 2529
72,429
b.
c.
Building amenities including front desk and Owner lounges.
Addition to parking structure with internal ramps and providing for completely
covered arrival. 61 new parking spaces with an easy additional 15 via valet
positioning.
George Ruther
February 7, 1999 (revised from December 2, 1999)
Page 3
4. Converting 9 existing DU's in Phase lla into deed restricted EHU's; 8 units are studios
with minimal kitchens and one unit is a one bedroom unit with full kitchen. Based on a
recently completed project of similar size, the Phase lll addition will create 25 new
jobs. At a requirement of 2O%o of this number, 5 new EHU's are required. lnstead of
the 9 units in Phase lla being deed restricted, we are now proposing to convert the
existing ski shop in Phase I into 6 new studio and one bedroom units (3 of each)
ranging in size from 390 SF to 52O SF.
5. Modifications to landscape on Gore Creek side of complex including removal of most of
the existing high berm thus opening up to the bike path and the creekscape. One
tennis court to remain, the other one and the volley ball court will go. Other
modifications per the submitted plans.
Proposed total GRFA would be 209,576 SF or 1 18Vo ot the total allowable on the site. This
is far less than the 250% maximum that would govern in Lionshead and even less than the
150% granted the Austria House in the Village.
Gomoliance with Lionshead Master Plan and Design Guidelines- November 17 issue
Existing Buildings:
1. Proposed modifications to roofs comply with the design guidelines even though the
proposed slope exceeds 12:12; the steeper roofs will lower apparent eaves, balance
roof area with wall area,
2. The proposed "landmark" roof elements will give the western edge of Lionshead the
presence of a "grand old hotel".
3. Proposed streetscape elements do comply with the Plan and guidelines.
New Building:
1. New building is right at maximum height limits with the proposed steeply sloped roofs
and small areas of flat roof. We are well below the roof height average required.
2. Our proposed 15:12 roof pitch is steeper than the 12:12 specified but again provides
significant aesthetic advantages the satisfy the intent of the guidelines: lower eave
heights and wall heights and a better balance between wall area and roof area. This
aesthetic benefit and addressing of intent is the basis for which we would seek
conditional approval as provided in Section 4.2.8.3. As for the small areas of flat roof,
they are comparable to those found at the Sonnenalp and would be visible only from
high on the mountain. They are also allowed under Section 4.2.8.1 .
3. The issue of height and flat roofs could be resolved if the datum for measuring height
is set at the top of the existing parking garage instead of at surrounding grade. We
have an unusual case here for new construction in that we do not have the option of
putting the structure completely below grade as could be done with other new
buildings.
George Ruther
February 7, 1999 kevised from December 2, 1999)
Page 4
I hope this gives you an adequate overview of our project. We look forward to the meeting
with the Council and PEC and a subsequently smooth approval process. We could
reluctantly accopt staff approval on this one if required to do so.
Sincerely,
GWATHMEY PRATT ABCHITECTS. P.C.
Henry R. Paatt, AIA
February 7, 1999
George Ruther
Town of Vail Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Road
Vail. CO 81657
Re: Marrioft's Mountain Rosort at Vail- major amendment to SDD- Gonditional Use Permlt
George:
Subsequent to our discussion last Friday. we are applying for a conditional use permit to
allow time-share units at the proposed Phase lll addition to the Marriott Hotel in Lionshead.
This application does not change the building or its bulk and mass in any way from that
presented to the Council and PEC on January 12. 1999 and recently submitted for approval
by the PEC. Nor does it change in any way the impacts associated with this project (light,
air, Town objectives, traffic, etcl. lt merely seeks permission to sell the units in a manner
that is consistent with the current market and this project's location. I will point out that
both fractional fee units and time-share units are conditional uses allowed under HDMF
zoning with no stated preference of one over the other.
The Phase lll component of the Marriott project is stated as a high priority project in the
Lionshead master plan. Regardless of whether it is approved as an amendment to an
existing SDD or as an exterior alteration under the new Lionshead zoning, what we are
proposing will provide higher occupancy rates and more warm beds than a condominium
(HDMF) project. For this reason alone, this conditional use permit for time-share under
HDMF should be approved.
A further explanation of why time-share is desirable is attached.
Sincerely,
:w
AIAHenry R. P?att,
CHULTZ ARCHITECTS, P.C.
a2/52/1999 l3:05 gag6g M}RTE I.EI€LL PAGE g2/94
rrrl, Colondo
Dcnwr, Cobl(k)
IvIonrce & Newell
Engrneers, Inc.
Dceec$cr-t3, 199+
Thc hfarrion Corporation
5f5[ Bcldiaclol4 Snitcs0O.
DrllN+ D(75240
Atn: Iv!r. V.K. Murthy
Rc: Maniott Pa*ing Strucf,urc, Vril, Colorado (!vt&N #2764)
Crmlcmcn:
As requested, Moruoc & Nswcl Engineers, Inc. recentiy conductcd an obscrvation of thc
F*ing.$nlctrre. The purposaof the gbservadgn wag to forn au opinion (consistcnt
with the limit*ion ofc bddvi$al obscrvation) of thc currcrn stnicnrat conditior of tho
building.
Thc parking structurc has three tevels. Thc uppcr ani niidie lcvcls arc framed with cast-
in-phe.eeoncreetoppin6 ottprocastcor.crctedclubtee$, preesQt concrelc b€ams or
span&elr, and prccast concrcte columns. The lcwer lwel is concrete slab-on-grade.. We
rssumc tho lbundrtion consists oFconvenrionaf sprea.dfiiotings. T& nn'o exiting sair
towcrsbar,c coocr.fc.-"rcnry uniturall+ preftbicarcAneml $drq rnd r procrllt
corset€ flat slab roof Extcrior walls which srppon bacldll rround the building arc cithcr
ca$-irtsfkce tr?frfi r$.cEcrils.
&n obocrvetion.inetudcdtwak+hroughof rhrrniddl-&r+lowcr lcvelq of each stair
tower, and of thc building pcimctu. The uppcr levcl of the struciurc was snorv-covered
s*us pniw-oft[rc*crior'rr&;
Ovedl, irjs our-opinienths Seeti*ing *rus$r*eonditiorofthc buibing is fair. Thc
eonomy of the orignrl construfiton and thc lack of mainrcnancc iC rpparen. llowever,
eccept-forrhc four items idcntiffibdow, it h our opinio'rr thcbuilding is strucrurally
sound at this tinc
ogI o
0046 E. Brtvcr Creek Dlvrl. . Suitc ,01 o l'. C). lt.r lJ97 o Avon, (:g1)r'.:{.1(, Hl6?0 . (J0J) 949-7768 o ljAX (10D 949'{0t4
g2/42/L993 13:05 MOI.FOE I.€II,ELL o
I*.onr-opinio4 s4nirof thc b[owiggfu *suidbemCc*rkr rr tooo rs posible;
l. nbove thc sonth cotralrce thc precut wrll pmd srpponing thc procast spandrel
is.enclqetadd€quatc snpport ftr fte sp'arffi rrnot bcing providcd.
L Or.&c north.cnd of thc eas sidq rhauacherpponing the precast spandrel is
craclced rnd s{port for rbc spandrel is quecioneble. i
3. The CMU south $rL towcr wall conrcr has friled and is not providing EdqluEtc
sworrftrdlcrpffi pnd
4. The.beunehmthenorthcndels-in4laeewa$supponingtb centcdinc IT bcam
is crack€d rrd shonld be reinforced. l
It is our opinion that these are the rcpairs noccsssry immediately to essure the facility is
strucurdlysr#."Webdi6'cth?eost ofthescrcpain shouk*baintlq or&r of nragnitudc
.of$8,000.00 to $12,000 00
Althotrgb og€ndittuoo roquircd for immodiatc rcpain ue minor, thc rnourt which sbould
behdgfa€e for Sort amd long tcnr mairftcma€e mA eosnt€tie F?akr could, bo vcry higlt"
It appcars that maintcnance to date has not existed. r'
Tb feilouingis alfutdnaimcnurcaitcms urd cosmetic repairs:
t. All wall paocl caulking shoul<i be replaccd.2; Afr a$o!.d'tt tf doutdbc't ncd ofnrrandpaintcd;-3. AII slab to wdl gnd slab to slab joints should be r*eeled.4. TFe rooFsof5oth stair towers shou$ be replaced.
5. Thsinterio'r-ofbothstairwaysshouki bcchfficriof efilorescencc and possibly
puned.
6. Tbv€odrctriningwdl o**ecas sidcof thebuMiag$ould be oonsidcrcd
T:
t.
9.
lq
tt-
tcmporaryudpbnsshouldbctnadoior€plsceit. l
Insiorwncntswah $ould bc cleancd.
The tee bea,ring area oh thc nonh starr core should be cosm€ti€8lly rcpaircd.
fie column 6ase at the southeast corner ofthe building should be re-drlpacked,
Thceonereeslab-oa-grade shouldha* eraekE6llcd, be clcaned ud scalcd.
Tle topping slabs qr double tces *rould be clcaned andrsealed.
A cost estimate lus not beco madc for thesc items since mos of this work is not stocnrral
and mueh # h eould be aecomf*ishcd by the beilding maint€nancc staff
PAGE g3/64
O2/O21L999 13:95 6808Bael },f,}RIE FEI#LL
utr xi[&Htrdrnde scPer*c orler daip **ehor ftc tHorrr rrcrs of dru.ilrnl
rcDsirs.
Iff--b+rygr*io6€tr€enmcnts, plcase call.
l&rfa{yycrq
MO}INOE E NBTB,L ENGI}iIEERS, INC.
PAGE g4/84