HomeMy WebLinkAboutCASOLAR VAIL II LOT 11 (2)tsign Review Action lrt
TOWN OF VAIL
'7.r'i.7i ditrl
r- .J
--f : 1"
Category Number'::1)I
..
Project Name:
Building Name:
Project Description:
owner, Address anapnone: 6't{ lrt,rult
-'\Architectcontact,Address and Phone:i'tf ft -7777
.4,y 5J/ f:vr.,ttru*rr,ta J f/bE<rr
Lesar Descripti lh'Ur'-lt-Brock 4 suoaivrsion //ra'la,r {zone Disrrict L\nt c
Proiect Street Address:qb,)t-',,
Comments: - rttI lrn,jl, h,t(.+,t .rl{?.
Board i Staff Action
Motionby: tn.4 vote: { - 0,1 4
'' t /'/
Seconded by: N"{-2.^^,71-
.fi'Approval,",'lo,[n"l
! Disapproval
D StaffApprovaf .., r.-\ ,,r' / ,4 ,,.: r' ./Conditions: ': J--<s a'V'o-- (-p i /, i +
,"',-. y'', , (fi l"r--0a /
1i'J\l'',{ t" t
r,4N
)..- i'.'
Town Planner r1 .-- -')Date: ,/"/v'/ l
XVfiite Conditions of Approvat
,',.'DRB Meeting Juty 19, 1995
t.t-
An1. Coordinatc all site grading and asphalt removal with the Homesteke Condo. Assoc.
ettempt should be made to coordinate project so that the Homestake parking lot is
regraded and drains into the storm drain inlet as originelly planned.
2. Provide a curb or short retaing wall along the edge of the Homestake parking lot.
3. All grading must be 2:l fletter.
to be minimum of 6 feet tall.
revised e/4/st
'a
DRB }PPLICATION - TO'SN.OF T'AIT,
DATE APPI,ICATTON RECEI\TED :
DATE OF DRB MEETING:
COLORADO
Fl{T'il .l'JL
rsrs .e,pp,.r*rffililliior "r o"qggrgg_r]] l,,il 26 rsgs il
ItNrrrJ Atl REeuryo..tllXo;1'xl.JroN rs susurrrdif)tr ,.\..-
T INFORMATION ilvt, utv,llfPiPROJECT INFORMATION:
A. DESCRIPTION:
B.TYPE OF REVIEW:
New ConstrrJction
Addit,ion ($50 .00)Conceptual Review
ADDMSS:
TEGAL DESCRIPTION:LoE ll Block
Subdivision
(5200 .OOl %rHor Alrerar.ion ($20.00)
($0)
If property is described bydescription, please provideat.tach to this application.
ZONING:
a meets and bounds legaton a separate sheet and
LOT AREA: If reguj.red,st,anped survey showing
applicant must, provlde a currentIot area.
G.
tf
.1''NAME OF APPLICANT: .t -.
Mailing Address:
APPLICANT' SAddress: / 'r
T NA}4E OF OWNERS:
*SIGNATURE (S) :Mailing Address:
J. Condominlum Approval if applicable.
NAME OFMailing
r DRB FEEi DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid at,the t,Lme of submittal of DRB application. Lieer, whenapplying for a building pernit., please identify tireaccurat,e valuation of the proposal . The Town of VaiIwill adJust the fee according- to the table below, t,ifiensure the correct. fee is paid.
FEE SCHT]DULE:
$ 50,001 - $ 150,000
$150,001- - $ 500,000
$500r 001 - $1,000,000$ Over $1,000,000
!'ESI 20.00$ 50 .00
$100.00
$200.00
$400.00
$500 .00
* DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAI EXPIRES ONE YEAR ATTER EIIIAIAPPROVA! ItNlEsS-AIBULLDING'PERMIT'IS' TSSUED AIID CONSTRUCTION ISST}RIED.
**NO APPLICATION WTLL BE FROCESSED WITEOUT OIWER'S SIGNATURE
rr1
III
A pre-application meeting wit,h a member of the planningstaff is. strongly encouraged to determine if any additionalapplication information is needed. It is the applicant'sresponsibility t.o make an appointment with the ilaff todetermine if t,here are additional submit.tal requirements.'PLease note. that a coMpLETE applicat.ion will sCreamline theapproval process for your project.
In addit,ion to meeting submittal reguirements, theappllcant must stake and tape the project sit,e toindicate property lines, building fines and buildingcorners. AII trees to be removed must be taped. Alfsite tapings and staking must be conpleted piior to theDRB site visit. The applicant nust ensure that stakinqdone during the winter is not buried by snow.
The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requirestwo separat,e meetings of the Design Review Board: aconcept,ual approval and a final approval . AppJ_icantsshould plan on presenting their development pioposal ata minimum of two meetings before obtaining finalapproval.
Applicants who fail to appear before the Design ReviewBoard on their scheduled meeting date and who have not,asked in advance that discussion on their item bePostponed, wiJ-I have their items removed from t.he DRBdocket until such time as the item has beenrepublished.
The following items may, at the discretion of thezoning administrator, be approved by the Communit.yDevelopment Department staff (i.e. I formal heariiqbefore the DRB may not be required) :
A.
B.
D.
a. Windows, skylightswhich do not alterbuilding,. and
and similar exterior changesthe existing plane of the
F
b. Building addition proposals not visible from anyother lot or public space. At the time such aproposal is submitted, applicants must includelet,ters from adjacent, property or,,rners and/or fromthe agent for or nanager of any adjacent.condominium association stating the associationapproves of the addition.
If a property is.Located in a napped hazard. area (i.e.snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow,wetland, etc) r a hazard study must, be'submitted and theowner must, sign an affidavit recogtnj.zing the hazardreport prior. to the issuance of a buildlng permit.Applicants are encouraged to check wit.h a-town plannerp:i9l to DRB application to d.erermine the relationshipof the property to all mapped hazards.
For al] residential construction:
Clearly indicate on the fioor plans the insideface of the exterior struct,ural waLls of thebuil-ding,. andfndicate with a dashed line on the site plan afour foot distance from the exterior fac! of thebuilding walls or supporting columns.
I f .DRB .appro{re6." the appl j,.cabion, +ri.th . condit j.ons ormodifications, all condit.ions of approval must beresolved prior to Town issuance of- i luifding permit
crr
t
rv.
Three copies of a recent topographic survea licensed survevor, aton which the following
Cable TVTelephone
B,Site Plan
ltt = 20t or larger,is provided:
1. Lot. area.
2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcelconsists of 6 acres or more, in which tase, 5rcontour intervaLs may be accepted.
3. Existing trees or groups of trees having trunkswith diameters of 4,, or more, as measured from apoint. one foot above grade
4. Rock out.croppings and other significant naturalfeat,ures (large boulders, intermittent streans,etc. ) .
5. Hazard areas (avalanche, rockfall, etc.),centerline of stream or creek, required creek orstream setback, 100-year flood plain and slopes of40t or more, if applicable.
5. Ties to existing benchmark, either USGS landmarkor sewer invert. This informaLion should beclearly stated on the survey so that allmeasurements are based on the sane starting point.This is particularly important for beight '
measurements. See policy On Survey Information,for more information regarding surveys.
7. Locations of the followinq:a. Size and type of drainage culverts, swales,etc. must be shown.
b. Exact location of existing utility sourcesand proposed service lines from their sourceto the structure. Utilit,ies to include:
a scal-e ofinformation
Sewer
Vilater
GasElectric
c. Show all utl1it.y meter locations, inciudingany pedestals to be located on si_te or in theright-of-way adjacent to the site. Revocablepermits from the Town of VaiI are requiredfor improvements in the rj.ght-of-way.
d. Property lines - distances and bearings and abasis of bearj-ng must. be shown
e. All easements (Title report, must aLso incLud,eexisting easement locatj"ons)
Existing and finished grades.
Provide spot elevat.ions of the sLreet, and aminimum of one spot elevation on eit.her side ofthe lot, 25 feet out from the side property lj_nes.
t.
.tlr Locations of L.ire foj-lowing:
a. Proposed surface drainage on and off sit.e.
b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spotelevat.ions must be shown.
All existing irnprovements including structures,landscaped areas, servj.ce areas, storage areas,
. . -. wal ks r" *dr j,vewaysr "o f-f =s t-reet"*parking 7 "I oadingareas, retaining walls (with top and bottom ofwall spot elevations), and other existing siteimprovements.
3.
and prgposed qrades shown underneith). Theseelevat.ions and grades must be proviaea in orderfor the staff to determine building height. AIIridge lines should be indicat,ed on tlre site plan.Elevations for roof ridges shall also be indicatedon.the site plan with corresponding finished andexisting grade elevations.
4, Driveway grades may not exceed 8t unless approvedby the Town Engineer.
Landscape Plan (1,'= 20t,or targer) - 3 copies required
1. The following information must be provided on theIandscape plan. The location of existing 4,'diameter or larger trees, the location, lize,spacing and type (comrnon and Iatin name) of al]existing and proposed plant material-. AII treesto be saved and to be removed must also beindicated. fhe plan must also differentiatebetween existing and proposed vegetation.
2. Complete t.he attached landscape materials list.
3. The locati.on and type of existing and proposedwatering systems t.o be employed in caring forplant mat,erial following its installation.
4, Exi-sting and proposed contour lines.
In order to clarify the inter-relation of the variousdevelopment proposal components, please incorporate asmuch of the above information as possible onto the siteplan.
9iqn gff fron each utilitv companv verifying thelocation of ut.ility service ana avaifaUifity (seeat.tached) .
A prglininarv title report must accompany allsubmittals, to insure property ownership-and locationof all easements on property.
Architectural Plans (!/8,, = !' or larger, I/4., Lspreferred scale for review) 3 copies iequired.
L. Scaled ffoor plans and aII eLevations of theproposed development. Elevat.ions must show bothexisting and finished grades.
2. One set of floor plans must be "red-lined" to showhow the gross residential floor area (GRFA) wascalculated.
3. Reductions of alI elevations and the site plan (g-1,/2" x 11") for inclusion in pEC and./or To-wnCouncil memos may be requested
4. Exterior surfacing materials and material colorsshall be specified on the at.tached materials 1ist.This materials list nust be completed andsubmitted as a part of DRB application. Colorchl.ps, siding sarnples etc., should be presented tothe Design Review Board meeting
?ong chgcll 1iS!. (attached) must be cornpleted if project.is located within the Single-Fami1y, tiimary/Sec6nOiryor Duplex zone districts.
Photos of the exi_sting site and where applicable, ofadjacent. structures.
NOTE:
D.
c
\/
VI
I.
Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopmentproposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopmentproposaL may be submitted in lieu of the more formalrequirements set forth above, provided all importantspecifications for the proposal including colors andmaterials to be used are submitted.
ADDITIONS - RESIDENTIAT OR COMMERCIAL
A. Original floor plans with all specifications shown.
B. Three sets of proposed fl-oor plans !/8" = L, or larger(!/4,' = !, is preferred)
C. Three copies of a site plan showing exisLing andproposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneath.
D. Elevations of proposed addition.
E. Photos of the existing structure.
F. specifications for aLr. materiar.s and color sampres onmaterials list (attached) .
At the reguest of the Zoning Administrator you may also berequired to submit:
G. A statement from each utility verifying location ofservice and avaj_Iability. See attaahea ut.i1it.ylocation verification form.
H. A site improvement survey, stamped by registeredprofessional surveyor.
I. A preliminary tit.Ie report, to verify ownership ofproperty, which lists all easements.
VII. FINAL SITE PLAN
Once a building permit. has been issued, and construction isunderway, and before the Building Department will schedule aframing j.nspection, two copj,es of an Improvement LocationCertificate survey (ILC) stamped by a registeredprofessional engineer must be subnitted. The fotlowinginformation rnust be provided on the rLC:
Building location (s) with ties to property corners,i.e. distances and angles.
Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot.
AIl utility service line as-builts, showing type ofmat,erial used, and size and exact locat,ion of lines.
Drainage as-buiIt.s.
Basis of bearing to tie to section corner.
A11 propert.y pins are to be either found or set andsLated on improvement survey.
A11 easements.
Building floor elevations and al1 roof ridge elevationswith existlng and proposed grades shown under the ridge1ines.
I*-?:ilg Administrator and,/or DRB-may require rhe rsubmission of additional plans, drawings,specifications, samples and other naterials (includinga model) if deemed necessary to determine whether. aproject will comply with Design Guidelines.
D.
c.
h
G.
H.
vrrr . coNcEPruAL o"rrt *"ur"*
SUbmittal Tequirenentq: The owner or authorized agentof any project requiring design approval as prescribedby this chapter may submit plans for concept.ual reviewby the Design Review Board to the Department ofCommunity Development. The conceptual review isintended to give the applicant a basic understanding ofthe compatibilit.y of their proposal with the Town'sDesign Guidelines. This procedure is recommendedprimariJ-y for applications more complex than single-family and two-family residences. However, developersof single-family and two-family projects shall not beexcluded from the opportunity to reguest a conceptualdesign review. Complete applications must. be sutrnitted10 days prior to a scheduLed DRB meeting.
The following information shall be submitted for aconceptual review:
1. A conceptual sit.e and landscape plan at a minimumscale of one inch equals twenty feet,-
2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior materialsand a description of the character of the proposedstructure or structuresi
3. Sufficient information to show the proposatcomplies wit.h the development standards of thezone district in which the project is to beLocated (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations,number of parking spaces, etc.);
4. Completed DRB application form.
Procedure: Upon receipt of an application forconceptual design review, the Department of CommunityDevelopment shalL review the submitted materials for-general .compliance with the appropriate requirements ofLhe zoning code. If the proposal is in bjsiccompliance with the zoning code requirements, theproject shall be forwarded to the DFA for conceptua]revj.ew. If the applicalion is not generally incompliance with zoning code requj_rements, theapplication and submittal materials shali be ret,urnedto the applicant with a written expJ.anation as to whythe Comrnunity Developnent Departnent staff has foundthe project not to be in compliance with zoning coderequirements. Once a complele application has beenreceived, the DRB shall review the submit,ted conceptualreview application and supporting material in order todetermlne whether 9r not tne project generally complieswith the design guidelines. tne-ORe does not-vote onconceptual reviews. The property owner or hisrepresenUative sha1l be present it tne DRB hearing.
)-..-
A.
R
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOr,4 7
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF
The. following information is reguired for submittal to the DesignReview Board before a final appfoval can be given:
TYPE OF MATERIAL COLOR
Fascia
Sof f it,s
Windows
Window lrim
Doors.
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
Flues
Flashings
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Other
LANDSCAPING: Name of Designer:
Phone:
SUBDIVISION
PRO..TECT:
NAME OF PROJECT:
LIST OF MATERIALS
A. BU]LDING MATERIALS:
Roof
Siding
Other WalI Materials
PLANT MATER]ALS:
PROPOSED TREES
Botanical Name Common Name Ouantitv Size*. c.ar,;f<,f0u< / _furn
B.
EXISTING TREES TO
BE REMOVED
*fndicat,e caliper for deciduous trees. Mininum caliper fordeciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferoust.rees. Minimum heiqht. for coniferous trees is 6 feet-
PLANT *r"*torJ Boranical Name
a
tp/ti+il1uJ
Co*o., fVt Ouantitv Size*
PROPOSED SHRUBS
EXISTING SHRUBS
TO BE REMOVED
'tlndicate size5 qallon.
GROUND COVERS
SOD
SEED
TYPE
OF IRRIGATION
TYPE OR METHOD OF
EROSION CONTROL
of proposed shrubs.
Tvpe
Minimum size of shrubs is
Square Footage
LANDSCAPE LTGHTTNG: rf exterior lighting is proposed, pleaseshow the number of fixLures and locations on- a separateIi-ghting.plan. rdent.ify each fixture from the :.i'ghting pranon the list below and provide tbe srattage, height abovegrade and type of light proposed.
4 ntt's-
orHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimmingpools, eLc.) Please- specify. Indi6ate heights of retaininiwalIs. Maximum height or wl11s within the-front setback it3 feet. Maximum height of waLls elsewhere on the propercyis 6 feet.
D.
2)
/1
SUBDIVlSION
JOB NAME
LOT BLOCK FILING
ADDRESS
The location and availability of ut.ilities, whether they be maint1un! ]ln"g or proposed Iines, must be approved and verified bythe following utilities for the accompanying site plan.
Authorized Signature Date
U.S; West Communicat.ions
1-8 0 0- 922-19 8 7468-6850 or 949-4530
Public Service Company
94 9-57 81Gary Hal1
Holy Cross Electric Assoc.949-s892
Ted Husky/Michael Laverty
Heritage Cablevision T.V.
9 4 9-553 0Steve Hiatt
Upper Eagle Valley Water& Sanitation District *
47 6-7 480Fred HasLee
NOTE:This form is to verify service availability andIocation. This should be used in conjunction withpreparing your utility plan and schedulinginstallations . '
For any new constructj.on proposal , the applicant,must provide a completed utility verificationform.
If a utility company has concerns with theproposed construction, the utility representativeshould not directly on the utility verificationform that there is a problem which needs to beresolved. The issue should then be spelled out,indetail in an attached letter to the Tovrn of VaiI .However, please keep in mind that it is theresponsibility of the utility company to resolveidentified problems.
If t,he utility verification form has signat,uresfrom each of the utllity companies, and noconments are made directly on the form, the Townwill presume that there are no problems and thatthe devel-opnent can proceed.
These verifications do not relieve the cont,ractorof his responsibilit.y ro obtain a slreet cuLpermit from the Town of Vail, Department of Pub1icWorks and to obtain utilitv locations beforediqqinq in any public right-of-way or easernent inthe Town of Vail. A buildinq permit is not astreet cut permit. A street cut permit must beobtained separately.
* Please bring a site pJ-an, floor plan, and elevations whenobtaining UpFe.r..EagJ,e..Va.J"Iey" $Iate{ -&.-Sa,nitaE-ioF.s,ignaEures. Fireflow needs must be addressed.
?
q
DATE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ADDRESS:
OWNER
ARCHITECT
ZONE CHECK
FORR, R P./S ZONE DISTRICTS
PIIONE
PHONE
AIlowed
(30) (33)
o
FR,
€osolar lo/l/o{k hms f i'/o
Filing
ZONE DISTRICT
PROPOSED USE
**LOT SIZE
Ileight
TOIa] GRFA
Primary GRFA
Secondary GRFA
Setbacks
Exist,inq Proposed
Front
Sides
Rear
Water Course Setback
Site Coverage
Landscaping
Retaining WaIl Heights
Parking
Garage Credit
Drive:
View Corridor Encroachment:
Environmental,/Haz ards :
425
425
3'/61
g.eqrd
(300) (500) (e00)
Pernitted Slope
(1200)_
_lll Actual SI
Date approved by Town Engin
Yes .> .) ',
1)
2l
3)
Flood Plain
Darr.ant Q'l n
kfal1
4)
Prevl-ous conditions of approvaticneck property file)
Does thls tequest involve a 25C Addition?How much of the arrowed 250 Addition is useffiEis request?
**Note: Under Sections L9.1,2.090(B) and 1g.13.0g0(B) of the Municipalcode, lots zoned Two Eamiry and prirnary/secondary which are less thanL5'000 sq. ft. in area may not construct a second dwelling unit. -The
community Deveropment Department may grant. an exception t6 thi;restrictiol Provided the applicant meets the criteiia set forth undersections L8 .L2.090 (B) and l_8.13.090 (B) of the Municipal code inc].roir,gperrnanently restr.i-cting- the. unit .as*.a,rongaLerm. .rentll unit for full-time ernployees of the Upper Eag1e Valley.
20,
15'
15'
(30) (so
c)/ Debris Flow
'tn
l.l MEMORANDUM
ALL CONTRACTORS
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAY g, 1994'
WHEN A'PUBLIC WAY PERMIT'IS REQUIRED
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
1)
2l
01
questionnaire regarding the need for a 'public Way
YES
ls this a new residence?
ls demolition work being performed
that requires the use of the right
of way, easements or public propefy?
ls any utility work needed?
ls the driveway being repaved?
ls ditferent access needed to site
other than existing driveway?
ls any drainage work being done
atfecting the right of way, easements,
or public property?
ls a "Revocable Right CI Way permit"
required?
A. ls the right of way, easements or
public property to be used for staging,parking or fencing?
B. lt no to 8A, is a parking, staging
or fencing plan required by Community
Development?
It19y. a19wet9d yes to any of these questions, a "Public Way Permit' must be obtained.?ublic Way Permit" applications may be obtained at the Public Work's otfice or atCommunity Development. lf you have any questions please callCharlie Davis, the Townof Vail Construction lnspector, at 429-2159.'
Permit'
,6)
V,
M
Mu
lo
t/o
,l/0
,/o
Mo
)4
3)
4',)
5)
6)
7')
8)
have read and answered allthe above
How it relates to Building permit:
lf yes was answeredro any of the above questions then a "public way permit" isrequired. You can pick up an apprication at either commtnitv Deveropment,located at 75 s. Frontage Road or pirotic works, tocateo atl-ioi'VaitVailey Drive.
Notice sign offs for utirity. companies. Art utirities must rierd verify (rocate)respective utilities n1-or tg signinj apprication. sor" utiiity-Lrp"nies require upto a 48 hour notice to schedule i td,date).
A consrruction tratfic-co_ntror pran must-_be prepared on a separate sheet of paper.This plan will show rocations of ail tratfic iontror devices (signs, cones, etc.) andthe work zone, (area of construction, staging, etc.)
sketch of work being performed must be submitted indicating dimensions (rength,width & depth of work). This may be orawn on the tramc iontrorpran or a siteplan for the job.
Pyo$ co-mpleted application to the pubtic work's office for review. rf required,tocates wiil be schedured forrhe Town of vair eredriJ;Jft';&;ion crew. Thelocates are take pface in the morning, out may require up to 4g hours to perform.
The Public work's conslruction Inspector wifr review the apptication and approveor disapprove the permit. you wirt be contacred as to the iiitrs i-.0 any changesthat may be needed. Most permits are rebaled within 4g nours oioeing received,but please allow up to one week to proceis.
As soon as permit is Rroces.s._e!, 3 copy wi, be faxed to community Deveropmentaltowing rh.e'Buildins-p.9rmir ro be rireas"d. pr;;;;;il ;#i.e the,pubricway permit" with a "Buitding permit'ro oo wo* on " prlj""-iiite'itserr.
Note:
*The above process is for work ln a rlght-of-way only.
'Public Way permlt't rr
t.'.1
{
1)
2)
3)
4)
s)
6)
7)
ermit a lication.
*A new Public Way permlt Is requlred each year,
oo
A^trf^{ *l
oo
Fl!-t $ffiPlf
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303 -479-2 I 38 / 479-2 I 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
November 17,1994
1 fu*thplDrporrrrnt of communitv Development
Mr. Jeff White
1101 Vail View Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Jeff:
Since I have not heard from you in so long, I assume that you have withdrawn your
application to install a retaining wall and landscaping at your residence. In lale August, I met
with Matt Morgan on the property to discuss your proposed site improvements. I spoke with
Matt and requested additional information before I could process the application. I have not
heard from either you or Matt since late August so I am hereby withdrawing your application
for design review approval. lf you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at
475-2138.
Sincerely,
tuq;#A
Randy Stouder
Town Planner
t0Pyril.t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2 I 3 8 / 479-2 I 3e
FAX 303-479-2452
August 10, 1994
-Sd^
tr',"**^'
* communitY DevetoPment
(a%ft"rrqt
Mr. Jetf White
1 101 Vail View Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Jeff:
Sorry | missed you last Friday. I visited the site late Friday afternoon and would like to take
this opportunity to raise some issues with your proposal. I would like to know more regarding
the height of the proposed retaining wall and the potential for impacts to the existing
vegetation. I am also concerned about adding top soil over the root zones of the existing
vegetation. There is no evidence ol gully erosion or other grade problems to indicate a maior
problem requiring fill. Flegarding the fence, I suggest that you propose a split-rail fence that
staggers or meanders rather than paralleling lhe property line in a straight line. The fence you
proposed, 5 foot 11 inch cedar fence has rarely received approval from the Design Review
Board (DFiB). Fences are generally discouraged in the Town of Vail. However, the split-rail
fence has been approved in other locations and if you choose to pursue the fence option I
think that the split-rail is the way to go,
I have scheduled your application for review by the DRB on August 17, 1994. Please plan on
attending to present the application to the DRB. lf you choose to modify the application and
go with the split-rail fence, I need to know this as soon as possible. Please supply the
information on the retaining wall no laterthan August 15, 1994. lf you have any questions
regarding this matter, please callme at 479-2138.
Sincerely,f4fu-
Randy St6uder , .t ./
rown Planne
^faffh/'{,.:fr*tr
TOWN OFVAIL
DEPAITTMENT OF OOI'I.UNITY DEVEI)PuE T
PAYABLE T() TOWN OF V
01 finO 42415
0l ffno 42415
01 0000 41332AiMhnnn
+ 0l m0021112
100un 42371
0t 0000 41330
I 0000 41330
01 0000 41
100m41330 lRE -
DATE
RECETVED FROM
til'g {s89$
Permit ltrrnbers
T*urhr BF*;;;.-*---
l,liscel laneqg Cash
sr-tF_?4 t6: J4:4o
F:*r*i.pr # li35lBfic':*urri #
JE:FF iilHITE',.F,F]EFfiIi] TIFIE
Htn,fr-ln l. t':nCi* r*d )
Itern paid
fflffErfir]4t f,J1F_j$r"l
f.h.lngi+ r* tu rn*,J 3
THFII{}{ 1/gU
ri,r,u r r.ssh i pr HE IIrI
?8.66
Fhrount paid
IB. EO
13. sF