Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975 DRB Agendas & MinutesL71 AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 9, 1975 1:00 PM *, m�n �Aed 1. VIGOR DUPLEX Preliminary 2. VA REAL ESTATE Sign application Stairway (J.J.Coll ins) -- q�ar AMA 3. SOME OTHER TIME - ANTIQUES V10 11 06t4+~_1( _-- W-- Sign application 4. BILL WILTO" �--- -- Entryway change 5. MUNICIPAL BUILDING Roof over stairway to Police Department 6. KING ARTHURS COURT. Weatherproofing r L 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOAR€. DATE OF MEETING: 1/9/75 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Ruoff Bill Hanlon Dudley Abbott Lou Parker Jen Wright SUBIECT• VIGOR DUPLEX - Preliminary ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; NOTION: Wright. VOTE: FOR; UNANIMOUS SECONDED BY Hanlon AGAINST: APPROVED: X DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Conceptual approval of general design qf_ preliminary lans. G - -- 6 Chairman of t o Boer Applicant DESIGN RE:VIEW.BOARD January 9, 1975 DATE OF MEETING: �._.r MEMBERS PRESENT: gill Ruoff ✓ Bill Hanlon,,*" Dudley Abbott ✓ Lou Parker,," Jen Wright,/ SUBJECT: Vail Associates Real Estate -- Sign application ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD`: MOTION: f�anIUn _ SECONDED BY PPOkrk.Tr-- VOTE: FOR: �� � - AGAINST: __ 1i ri h APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: a " Applicant Chairman ; �oj t 4od DATE OF MEETING: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1/9/75 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Ruoff Bill Hanlon Dudley Abbott Lou Parker Jen Wright SUBJECT: Vail Associates Real Estate - Stairway ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Hanlon VOTE: FOR. Ruoff Hanlon Abbott Parker APPROVED: X DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: SECONDED BY Abbott AGAINST: (Abstained- Wright) _ Chain to be placed at end of wa_ _lkway. Stairway to be moved back slightly to the east to prevent bein hit by snowplow. _ Tem_porarY approval until June 1, 1975, at which time _ a2plication will be made for _ermanent stairway. chairmari of the Vild Applicant 1 - . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 9, 1975 DATE OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Rouff Bill Hanlon Dudley Abbott Lou Parker Jen Wright 0 40 SUBJECT: Some Other Time _ Antiques Sign application ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: Hanlon SECONDED BY Parker VOTE: FOR: - AGAINST: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; SUMMARY: Unanimous EM Wording of sign may be either "Some Other Time" _ or "Some Other Time - Antiques" as long as the actual size of the sign remains the same. 4A p) 2p �1�ia n �t Chairman of t �:o. •i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: 1 /9/75 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Ruoff Bill Hanlon Dudley Abbott Lou Parker Jen Wright SUBJECT: Bill Wilto - Entryway change ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Hanlon VOTE: FOR: n LJ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: (Unanimous) x .. ey d, - )U/v A., cl�a'irman of lVe"Bo6rd SECONDED BY Parker AGAINST: Applicant r 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: 1/9/75 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Ruoff Bill Hanlon Dudley Abbott Lou Parker Jen Wright SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL BUILDING - roof over stairway to Police ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: Parker SECONDED BY Ruoff VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: 10 APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • Unanimous X Chairman of th ar Applicant t. ■ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD-Ii. DATE OF MEETING: 1/9/75 MEMBERS PRESENT; Bill Ruoff Bill Hanlon Dudley Abbott Lou Parker Jen Wright SUBJECT: Kinq_Arthur's Court —Keatbgrpr9of-iM. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Parker -SEC6NDFD BY Abbots VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: (Unanimous .APPROVED: —X DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Weatherproofing _approved _fSjr, orary__period of six months. (Expires 7/9/75) Chaixmanf of (� he�'bdgd App li.caiit e 2. 3. GG� 51� AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 16, 1975 1:00 PM BRIDGE_WATER INN Duct System - Jim Cunningham LIONS DARE NORTH Exterior Change - Jim Cu ingham HANSEL & GRETEL Menu Board and Sign Applications Lotahr Klaschick MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JANUARY 16, 1975 A regular meeting of the Design Review Board was held on Thursday, January 16, 1975 at 1:00 P.M. in the Police Conference Room of the Vail Municipal Building. The members present were: Dudley Abbott Bill Hanlon Lou Parker Bill Rouff Jen Wright Members of the staff present were: Bill Pierce Jim Cunningham presented a variation to the present duct system at the Bridgewater Inn on the east side around the second floor. There have been complaints about the various smells and.noise that are emitted by that particular duct. Jerry Aldrich, the Building Inspector for the Town of Vail, had approved the design and set -up of the proposed duct system. It shall be sheet metal and covered with white stucco. The smoke and fumes from that duct will be blown in the 12 foot area between the Bridgewater Inn and • the Lions Square Lodge. Jen Wright made the motion for approval, and it was seconded by Bill Rouff. The vote was unanimous. Second on the agenda was the exterior changes to Lionsquare North and that was presented by Jim Cunningham. Mr. Cunningham pointed out that there were no major changes to the original plans, they just wanted to enclose the original patio area on the ground floor and one -- -half of the patio area on the second floor to create more interior space. Mr. Rouff, who had the chance to study the changes, remarked that the proposed changes would not detract from the aesthetics of the building. Mr. Cunningham pointed out that there was approximately 22 feet to 37 feet of space from .the building and the road, and plans were in the malting for a large berm with landscaping. Mr. Parker madek motion for approval on the condition that these plans were subject to 'a final zoning check; Bill Rouff seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous for approval. Hansel & Gretel Restaurant was represented by Lothar Kl'aschick. After some deliberation as to how many public entrances the Hansel & Gretel Restaurant had, the decision being two,.the proposed display box was approved on the condition that it be encased in glass. Dudley Abbott made the motion; Jen Wright seconded it. The vote was unanimous,for approval. 0 ,Design Review January 16, 1975 Page Two The point was then raised that the Hansel & Gretel was in violation of the Sign Ordinance being that it had three signs, one sign on the north side of the building, and two on the south side. (The Ordinance only allowing one sign per public entrance.) The application for the sign on the north side was approved on the condition that the sign on the north side shall re- main as erected, one of the window signs on the south side shall have the words Hansel & Gretel removed or covered up thus making it in compliance as a graphic. Motion for approval was made by Lou Parker and it was seconded by Dudley Abbott. The vote was unanimous. As there was no further business to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 2:30 P.M. 0 0 i i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: d gM4)eY /6! /.975 MEMBERS PRESENT: ___ 13,14A- a&_ oFC W f31A ,& tfA�v cbitl ►•' r f�� ,c ©u. t�,� ��z ✓w, SUBJECT: �IP1�C�r.FM/ATi�/�' iI11fJ�Y - _�k � _ �ySTit I►�J — ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: wl'l-6497- SECONDED BY -P,41e 4W VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: _ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: chalm,tfi -of the Bo Applicant. i 0 0 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF HIETING: /,925 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: p T ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: --SECONDED BY_te".l0=r_ VOTE: FOR; AGAINST; APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Cha�jrnian of the T3oard Applicant I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: _r,1Bd)14.4/?s! Zj�_ 9/ ?-.5_ MEMBERS PRESENT: _ , ZA RalaFG - 13 alt 67T SUBJECT: �1�L-:C� k= 7n - DjSPAo0V_ �. A4 eau ejb) ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: 4iOPjOt1ro+77oaI MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: i 0 APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: l � 4 Cha'_ an of the Boar ---. t L p 0 • I I . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: C,/,q vu�w y /9 75 -- 14EMBLFRS PRESENT. j1 l.�4FF ABBOT SUBJECT: HAAI.5,erA c3la-w 1,44 MWOW ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: APPROVED: v DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 112 j C o f licant r. W AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JANUARY 30, 1975 1:00 P.M. 1. Mead First -- reposition of awning aIR604--Cz 2. Discussion of proposed changes to the Sign Ordinance I 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD w L] DATE OF MEETING: Jay ry _30,_..1._9 MEMBERS PRESENT: Dudley _Abbott Bill Hanlon Lou- Parker Bill Rouff_ Jen Wright SUBJECT: Head First repositioning of awning ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Hanlon SECONDED BY Parker VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: - APPROVED: unanimousl DISAPPROVED: SWARY : Chadma,n of/the' Beard Applicant __ w^ AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 6, 1975 1:00 P.M. 1 Review of House Plans Booth Creek Z/,; q Jim Cra i g /"0- 0�����'�'� 7/za� I,{' GL 4 a �Gu. • 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Is DATE Or MEETING: February M6, 1975 MEMBERS PRESENT: Dudley Abbott Bill Hanlon Lou Parker- Bill Rouff__�� Jen Wright SUBJECT: Review of House Plans -- Jim Craig, Booth Creek Lot ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Abbott SECONDED BY Wright VOTE: FOR; AGAINST: APPROVED: Unanimously DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: _ The l ans were approved =a_ the con i to that a natural stucco nut alana the bQtton -Ulf of the house to _the top of tre .lower window level A),///0,/112..___,v / Chairman of t o Zr,-" Chairman Applicant. 0 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Blame of Applicant Address of Applicant 2588 West Ar��, . Qrive, Vail. Colora�da- Telephone Number of Applicant 476 --5425 I hereby certify that the plan(s) for Lot 9 Block 2 Vail Villa e 12th Filing --- Booth Creek have been approved (disapproved) by the Design review Board on 2 g6/_ with the following conditions that a notural colored stucco b t along the botton half of the house to the top of the lower window level l 56c? -e ary to esign Review Board f�t- ed r 0 AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 13,1975 1:00 P.M. 1. Country Flair - - -- canopy r ltic. 2. Indian Paint Brush ---- wall sign (�?� 3. Skaull House Unit-2 -- remodeling 0 4. Proposed changes to the Sign Ordinace: a. Definitions b. Temporary Site Development Provisions 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: February 13,_ 1975 MEMBERS PRESENT: Dudlev Abbott Bill.Hanlon �f Lou Parkery�� Bill Routi Jen Wright SUBJECT: Country Flair -- canopy ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Wright SECONDED BY Parker VOTE: FOR: Hanlon AGAINST: Abbott . Parker Roull _. APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Chairman of the X Wright Applicant 0 DESIGN REVIEW. BOARD DATE OF MEETING: Februar_y 13 , 1975 MEMBERS PRESENT: _ Dudley Abbott SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: Parker VOTE: FOR: Bill Hanlon Lou Parker Bill xRouf f —_ Jen Wright Indian Paint Brush -- wall sign south side of Sitzmark Building _ SECONDED BY Wright___w AGAINST: Abbott • Hanlon Parker Rouff Wright APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: unanimous SUMMARY: Sign denied becuase he has no entrance on the south side of the building Chairman of the' l Applicant 0 r� L� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: February 13, 1975 MEMBERS PRESENT: Dudley Abbott�� Bill Hanlon �TY Lou Parker - - Bill Rouf f Jen Wright /T SUBJECT: Skaull House remodeling of Unit 2 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: Wright SECONDED BY parker -- VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: APPROVED: Unanimously DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY ljl12 Chairman of th Applicant CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL "Zane of Applicant Dean E. Norris Address of Applicant 1.225 Orchard Road, Golden, Colorado 80401 Telephone Number of Applicant I hereby certify that the plan(s) for the remodeling of Unit 2, Skall House have been approved (disapproved) by the Design Review Hoard on 2/1'3/75 with the following conditions n/ a 5 cretary to 'esign Review Board ate n l�1 r 0 0 OF �;1 1 Y d� lovio box 100 nail, coloratlo 81657 (303) 476.5613 Mr, Dean E. Norris 1225 Orchard Road Golden, Colorado 80401 Dear Mr. Norris: office, of the town manager February 18, 1975 Enclosed you will find a Certif irate of Approval from the Design Review Board and a Building Permit application. The Building Permit has to-be filled out and returned to the Town of Vail; you have been credited $10.00 for'the building permit fee, 1 would also like to remind you that there are a number of inspections that have to be done in regard to the remodeling of your Unit in the Skall House, i.e. framing inspection. When the framing has been completed, please call the Town of Vail for an inspection before the frame is covered. if you have any questions, please give either myself of Bill Pierce a call. /Jk enclosures 2 Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jo Kramer TO: Design Review Board FROM: Jo Kramer DATE: February 12, 1975 RE: Proposed Changes to Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1973 Under the Section titled Definitions these are the proposed additions: STAINED -GLASS Pieces of glass held together by foil or lead and have the various joints soldered together. Stained - glass signs, at the discretion of the Design Review Board, may be either backlighted or have indirect lighting. BACKLIGHTING A source of light which is located behind the sign and shielded from the viewer's eyes by a translucent or opaque material. Since a new definition pertaining to materials is being added, there has to be a slight change in the DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES which accountsfor the use of suggested materials. PARAGRAPH 3 Sign materials should be predominately natural such as rough cedar, pine or other types of wood, stained- glass may also be considered by the Design Review Board. Plastic or other synthetic materials are discouraged, There are a few sections in this Ordinance that need to.be definitely defined, such as TEMPORARY SITE DEVELOPMENT SIGNS, in which the location is not clearly defined in the present Ordinance. Suggested changes are: E. LOCATION: Said sign must be located within the site boundaries, with the specific location of said sign on said site subject to the approval of the Design Review Board. At the present time TEMPORARY SITE DEVELOPMENT SIGNS can only indicate a development of real property under construction in HDMF, PA, CSC, CCI,C.C2 and SD zones, there should be a provision for signs identifying developments in MDMF, LDMF and RC zones. If these additions are .made, the provision would read: Design Review Board February 12, 1975 Page Two TEMPORARY SITE DEVELOPMENT SIGNS A, PURPOSE: To indicate or identify a development of real property under consturction in HDMF, PA, CCI, CC2,.SD, MDMF, LDMF, and RC zones. r1 CHANGES TO SIGN ORDINANCE Section 1 -3 -0 -4 Window Signs --- A sign affixed on or located within thi ty-- six (36) inches of the interior surface of a window fronting a public way, which sign shall not include the two (2) square feet allowed for the display of hours, credit card infor- mation, and similar general information items. SECTION 1 -3 DEFINITIONS A--H remain the same I. Lighting, Back - an indirect source of light which is located from behind the sign surface or shielded from the viewer's eyes by a translucent or opaque material. J. Lighting, indirect -- definition remains the same K. Lighting, pan - channeled It L. Person " M. Plate line f' N. Resortation " 0. Reflective surface " P. Signs Q. Size, allowable " R. Stained -glass --- multi pieces of translucent material held together by foil or lead tames and have the various joints soldered together. Signs made out of translucent materials, at the discretion of the Design Review Board, may be either backlighted or have indirect lighting. S. Subdivision " T. Zone " SECTION 2 -3 Sign materials should be predominately natural such as rough cedar, pine or other types of wood, stained -glass may also be considered by the Design Review Board. Plastic or other materials are discouraged. SECTION 14 -11-i Section "i" is amended to read as follows; A sign or signs advertising temporary events are exempt from this definition provided that a single sign does not exceed six (6) square feet with a maximum area of ten (10) square feet aggregate for all signs denoting temporary events provided such sign or signs are removed at the conclusion of the temporary event and erected prior to ten (10) days before the event is scheduled to take place. A temporary event is one which does not last more than 30 consecutive days in any given calendar year. VARIANCE PROCEDURE 4 Amendment to Section 17 of the Sign SECTION 17 1. Purposes and Limitations In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this ordinance variances from the regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a structure or the location of said structure from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate- vicinity or from other physical limitations, - - -- - - -- - -__ street locations, or traffic conditions in the immediate_ -_ —_ vicinity. Cost of inconvenience to the applicant of strict or or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. A variance may be granted with respect to any regulation contained in this ordinance. 2. APPLICATION Application for a variance shall be made upon a form provided by the Administrator. The variance application shall include the application for a sign permit and shall also state the applicant's reasons for requiesting variance in accordance with the criteria set out in Section 7 of this ordinance. 3. VARIANCE FEE The Town Council shall set a variance fee schedule sufficient to cover the cost of Town staff time and other expenses incidental to the review of the application. The fee shall be paid at the time of application and shall not be refundable. 4. HEARING Upon receipt of a variace application, the Administrator shall set a date for hearing. 5. NOTICE..' Not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the hearing the Administrator shall cause a copy of a notice of the time and place of such hearing to. be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the County of Eagle. 6. ACTION BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD . Within 20 days of the closing of a public hearing on a variance application, the Design Review Board shall act on the application. The Board may recommend approval of the applicaton as submitted or may recommend approval of the application subject to such modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purpose of this ordinance, or the Board may recommend denial of the application. A variance may be revocable;ortmay be granted for a limited time period. 7. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Before acting on a variance application, the applicant must prove physical hardship and the Board must find that: A. there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures of other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right -of -way, which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question; provided however, that such special circumstances or conditions must be unique to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention, and do not apply generally to all business or enterprises; B, that such special circumstances were not created by. the applicant or anyone in privy to °:.�.). the applicant; C. that the authorizing of the application will be in general harmony with the purposes of this ordinance, and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or the public welfare in general; D. the variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of this ordinance may more than is required to identify the applicant's business or use; E. such other factors and criteria as the Design Review Board deems applicable to the proposed variance. 8. ACTION BY THE TOWN COUNCIL Within seven (7) days follwing action of the Design Review Board, its decision shall be transmitted to the applicant and to the Town Council. At its next regularly scheduled meeting following receipt of the decision of the Design Review Board, the Town Council shall review the.decision of the Board, and may confirm, modify, or reverse its decision. If it deems insufficient information is available to provide the basis for a sound decision, the Council may postpone final Iaction for not more than 20 days, and the Council may, at its option, conduct an additional hearing in accord with the provisions of Section 4 of this provision. Failure of the Council to act prior to the postponement date it sets shall be deemed approval of the action by the Design Review Board, unless the applicant consents to a time extension. • 0 AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 27, 1975 1:00 P.M. 1. Mullin Residence — 2. Tivoli Patio. Addition �Q�ql - ,�1�'�L� -►� ,�Qe(�U��ir�� 3. Craig Residence e6 r off-/ ,Ook ;--- /3Y , /19Y DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: MEMBERS 'RESENT: AU SUBJECT: 8�� - ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; l MOTION: f� --SECONDED _ _SECONDED BY!�t/�j� VOTE: FOR; FOR; AGAINST: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Chairman of the Board Applicant CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL �= p Name of Applicant Carr Mullin r Address of Applicant Telephone Numb of Applicant 1 hereby certify that the plan(s) for modifications to sidence n Lot 21, Block 2, 13th Filing have been approved (-d4 wr-oved) by the Design Review Board o,A2_L jLz5 with the following conditions_ n/a ..� u F- -I r-K� to view Board 95/�i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DA'f£ OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: 6, 4•L SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: ffsx"lly "m DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Chairman of the Board Applicant DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: j MEMBERS PRESENT: z &r - l ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOT ION : � SECONDED BY ')&' � -- VOTE: FOR; AGAINST: _ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; SUMMARY: Chairman of the Board Applicant 0 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Na,7e of Applicant Janes Craiq Address of Applicant 2588 West Arosa Drive, Vail Telephone Number of Applicant I hereby certify that the plan(s) for residence located on Lot 7 2 Vail Village 12th filing have been approved (disapproved) by the Design keview Board on 2/27175 with the following conditions ap roved as oriqinall.y submitted �Zol kvri mer 5 cretary to asign Review Board lia e 0 DESIGN REVIEW HOARD DATE OF MEETING:f -5. MEMBERS PRESENT: - SUBJECT: -d�T ACTION TAKFN BY BOARD; MOTION: � SECONDED BY�� V !� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: APPROVED: mQADoDnvrn, 1.: I7`tLi.i;lElii.11 UJ. 1,1:t, �a�. /c1� u - ^s- a- ^— •- -- - -- • CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ;dare of Applicant H. Hell berg Address of Applicant '70 Hillcrest Avenue , Chalfont, PA 18914 Telephone Dumber of Applicant I hereby certify that the plan(s) for a residence on Lot 1, Block 2, Forest Road have been approved (disapproved) by the Design Review Board on 2/27/75 with the following conditions 1. shorten chimney; 2. use off -white stucco; 3. restoration of landscape 4.incorporate a trash receptacle. JP 'Kramer /JP to esign Review Board r- 4,2, f 0 I� 0 0 4 t towl _ box 100 va+l, Colorado 81657 (303) 476.5613 Mr, Herman Hellberg 70 Hillcrest Avenue Chalfont, PA 18914 Dear Mr, Hellberg; office of the town manager. March 5, 1975 Enclosed you will find a Certificate of Approval from the Design Revlew:Board with..the recommended changes to the preliminary plans of your residence on Lot lx Block. 21 Forest Road, Vail, Colorado, The fee.for the Design Review Boardp according to the estimates you gaye me,.is $50,00 on any plans or changes valued from $25,000- $100,000, If you could mail a.check made out to-the Town of Vail it would be appreciated, If you hove any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me, Sincerely, /J k enclosure. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT t o Pra e r Secretary to Design Review Board E AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 6, 1975 1. Colorado Mountain College - Randy Milhoan a. Sign b. Bu11etin Board 4141l&gi.,ij �1_,I 71 2. Timber Falls modification -- Bob Ruder. 3. Tivoli Patio. Addition 4. Variance request for sign directory r1 Sitzmark Lodge -- Reese Ll 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF NEETING: Atc,/ MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: W,6 ' - MOTION: _ SECONDED BY — VOTE: FOR; — AGAINST: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: r • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: _ SECONDED BY- /�/ VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: 0 DISAPPROVED: • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF 14EETING: 4L1 876 _ MEMBERS PRESENT: Z"Zo-5t SUBJE (�l'1lT ACTION TAKEN BY 130ARD� MOTION: �y __ — SECONDED BY VOTE. FOR: AGAINST: �. .. APPROVED: r,�na 1'1Le,� _ �• i�1 DISAPPROVED: ..�._ SUMMARY: 0 ID J i, . DATA. OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT; SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW! BOARD 94�_"-v 19 W Ar Q, ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: ,_ -- SECONDErD BY_ ��T�� VOTE: FOR.: AGAINST. APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; SUMMARY; Chairman of the Board Applicant LETTER FROM BILL REFSE 40 February 27, 1975 Dear Sirs: It is suggested that exposure signs are necessary for the Lower Level Mall to indicate location to that heavier traffic. on Gore Creek Drive of the three shops: The Breeze Ski Rentals, My Favorite Things, and The Indian Paint Brush. The signs in the front of the building representing Vail Associates, The Left Bank,and La Coiffure Salon are already in logically approved locations to direct traffic through the front entrance of the Sitzmark to these business establishments. To have the directional signs for the Lower Level Mall in the immediate vicinity of these signs would be the solution to directing Gore Creek Drive Traffic to these three shops for the benefit of those people who otherwise would not have known of their existence. It seems the signs in such close vicinity, although of slight variance to. the regulations, would satisfy the requirements of the sign ordinance without being unduely conspicious, which might be the case if an additional sign for the Left Bank were installed,for this business is already well directed -- by an approved sign and menu board. Furthermore, it is within the spirit of the sign ordinance, which is to have signs at a minimum in number but yet represent the business location in the most attractive and efficient manner. MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 6, 1975 RE: Variance for Indian Paint Brush, My Favorite Things, and Breeze Ski Rentals The following businesses, the Indian Paint Brush, My Favorite Things and Breeze Ski Rentals, are requesting a variance from the sign ordinance regarding Projection and Hanging Signs: Joint Directory Signs for a Multi - Tenant Building, Section 14 -9. The specific aim of the variance request is to modify portions of the Statement of Purpose (sub - section a) in order to remove the requirement of listing all tenants in a multi- tenant building. The proposal is to erect a sign directing potential customers to the Lower. Level of the Sitzmark Lodge. The proposal intends to use the existing format of hanging signs identifying Vail Associates Real Estate and La Coiffure Salon with the only difference being the placement of the words "Lower Level Mall" above the identification signs for Indian Paint Brush, My Favorite Things, and Breeze Ski Rentals. This leaves the already existing signs for Vail Associates Real Estate and La Coiffure unmarked as to what level,.street or lower mall, they are located on. This may or may not be legitimate -- it seems to eliminate, to some extent, unnecessary signage, but it does prevent logical continuity of the directory. In this directory proposal the Sitzmark Lodge, The Left Bank, and Mountain Bel.1 are not included. The applicant feels that these businesses are clearly signed at this time and that since Mountain Bell does not want Is any extra signage that they could be eliminated. • I� MEMO - DRB March 6, 1975 Page Two Another problem we have found is that if these businesses were included in the sign directory,i.e. Vail Associates Real Estate, La Coiffure, The Sitzmark Lodge, The Left Bank,and Mountain Bell, that according.to Ordinance Flo. 9, Series of 1973, these businesses would be eligible for another wall sign which might "crowd" the building. In our opinion the primary purpose of a directory is to provide a service to those wishing to locate a particular place or business within a building rather than providing an additional outlet for advertisement. A sign directory, if it is to be a service to potential customers, must have a logical arrangement as well as a complete listing of the businesses oc- cupying the building. For these reasons,we recommend denial of this application for variance. ljk AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 13 1975 1:00 VM. 1. Williamson Residence -- Jim Morter e. 9wxl:��� 2. The Bath Garden sign applicat'onajo'�t« 3. Will 0' The Wisp -- sign applica -- Keith Carosel 1 i 4. Alfie Packer's sign applications -- Rayno Seasor,a,a 5. Hallenbeck Residence, Timber Falls G�2Jc.a1�/n� -- patio addition -- Bob Ruder ` 6. Casino Vail -- sign application -- David Iden 7. Proposed Variance Procedure -- staff 0 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DAVE OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: GCJ SUBJECT: /6 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: SECONDED BY L16 VOTE: FOR; _ AGAINST: APPROVED; DISAPPROVED: _ -- SUMMARY: Cla irmim of thg Ward .Applicant 93 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: - j// 0— MEMBERS PRESENT; Lie aA kA� SUBJECT: Zkt ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: SECONDED BY MOTION: VOTE: FOR; AGAINST. APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 0 I � - v Cb •n of the --V ar Applicant DESIGN REVIEW BOAP". DATE OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: _—SECONDED BY_)��/ VOTE., FOR. -AGAINST: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Chairman of the Board Applicant 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE 01= MEETING: -3 "J5 MEMBERS PRESENT: 5:v SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: , SECONDED BY�II VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: i APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Ci'man of tii"oard Applicant DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: � // MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD; MOTION: Y SECONDED B . L2 — VOTE: FOR: AGAINST: 0 APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; SUMMARY: A F,h—alr�Tan of the Board m n �.J 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING: MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: KI SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AG'4INST: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Chairman of the Board Applicant ARENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 20, 1975 1:00 P,M. 1. Fountain Cafe r vestibule ez -r Maria Erb 2. Gramshammer's entrance to basement4e, r- Sheila Gramshammer 3. Northwoods Buildings AP' CCj�Y-tw minor modifications ..F Gordon Pierce J 4, East Meadow Mall -.- staff 5. Lionshead Tot Lot C%0 -- staff 6. Sign Program for Sitztiark Lodge ,�"Wo- /XCjCV-, &'040, � • 7. Minor .change to application procedures -- staff • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. • • AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 27, 1975 Revisions to New Crossrgqads addition �� �'0'16c - n� 4%�� `� -- Ron Todd lr��a�jpin� �p-w.. 1aj Blanch Hill -- &aAlAO -71 dp-4 4rl'&�( -V:/,t i,L � Warren & Sommer sign application�oGd Alfie Packers -- variance.. --- Rayno Seasor Vote by Design Review Board to exempt the Bass, Scott, House pool as an accessory use. Consideration of memorandum to Town Council DES f G1 REVIEW BOARD DATE, OF MEETINIGJ�_d,/�( X7,_1! -L�� PRESENT., 81113JECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: SECONDED BYjP MOTION:.Z��� d,&_ A, A- -- � 0 VOTE . FOR: I*-"' APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: AGAINST SUMMA RY i MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Design Review Board DATE: March 31, 1975 RE: Consideration of the Blanch Hill exterior changes to residence and addition of commercial space Mrs. Hill and her attorney, Jay Peterson, were notified that the Design Review Board would review the plans for. the above mentioned additions on March.27, 1975 at their regularly scheduled meeting. The owner and /or her representative failed to appear or present any material to the Design Review Board for their review, therefore the Board was unable to take any action. /jk • • DESIGN REVIEW DOARD DATE' OF MELTING/� bz� V- 2 1 —5 M T : P ' AJE%IBERS RE 4z SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOT ION --4lZt7---- SECONDED By VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D IsAPPRONTED: vol, -11 ly box 100 office of the fawn manager vail, cotorado 81 657 (303) X476 -5613 March 3l , 1975 Mr. William Wilto c/o Warren & Sommer P.O, Box 669 Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Warren & Sommer Sign Dear mill: On March 27, 1975 the Design Review Board considered your application for a sign "Warr.en & Sommer ". The Board denied the application. The reason for rejection is that they felt. the Slifer Building was in need of a logical sign program. According to Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1973, a sign pro- gram is defined as: "A comprehensive approach to a sign or group of signs for an entire building," Enclosed you will rind a copy of -the sign ordinance with the provisions for a sign program marked, The best approach would be to get together with the owner of the building and the tenants of the building and decide what type of program you would like to have,and once a decision is made, resubmit your application to the Design Review Board as well as the applications for the other businesses. if you have any questions please call. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o gamer Sign Administrator DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF 1SEE,rlNG4,.4 ,2 MEMBERS PRE'SE'NT: SUBJECT: L ACTION TAKEN By BOARD: MO LaV _-----SECONDED B 7 TJON :_.z� f z • VOTE AGAINST_ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:- 2L I-aano s'zaser Wr)P �jIAN'F---- 0AUL DATE OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAIMN BY BOARD: SECONDED BY- � MOTION: AaALt-l- VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPEWED: DISAPPROVED:— SUMMARY: fowl box 100 vaiil, colorado 81657 13031 476 -5613 Mr. Grant Williams Two Ladue Lane St. Louis, MO Dear Mr. Williams; office of the town manager April 15, 1975 Enclosed please find a memorandum prepared and submitted by the Design Review Board the pproval council. The Cucil its that t a full regret that pp and proper consideration in regards to the Set Back Requirements. This matter has been reconsidered by the Design Review Board and a motion to exempt the pool from the set back requirements was approved unanimously. The Town Council concurs in this latest approval, and even though it is not presently the responsibility of the Town to notify people when a structure is being built in their neighborhood, the Town will endeavor to do this in the future. We apologize for the fact that this matter was not fully and properly considered at the outset, and we are sorry that this matter has been an inconvenience to you, If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. JAD/ j k enclosure Sincerely, T N 0 VAIL John A. Dobson Mayor MEMORANDUM TO; Town Council FROM; Design Review Board DATE; March 31, 1975 RE; Grant William's objection to the Design Review Board's action on the Bass, Scott, House swimming pool According to Section 15.500, Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973, (the Zoning Ordinance), "The Design Review Board shall review the material and shall approve, disapprove, or request changes in the design of the project within 15 days of the date of its meeting at which the material is received... Failure of the Board to act within the prescribed deadline shall be deemed approval of the design of the project unless the applicant consents to a time extention..." With this apparent time limit for the Board to consider various pro - jects, the Design Review Board prefers to make decisions on projects on the date that they are submitted for consider- ation, and customarily the Design ReviewiBoard does act on the first meeting unless insufficient information is sub- mitted. With resepct to Mr. William's objection to the lack of "color" consideration by the Design Review Board, Section 15.600, paragraphs 1, 6, and 9 of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1973, (the Zoning Ordinance), should clarify Mr. William's objections. The plans that were submitted to the Design Review Board de- noted the materials for the proposed structure to be natural rough sawn cedar,and they were approved as such. In regards to exemption for accessory use -- recreational amenity -- from minimum set back requirements, the Design Review Board did in fact exempt the pool as a structure in accord with the provisions of Section 17.100 of the Zoning Ordinance, but the part the Design Review Board did overlook was exemption of the pool as an accessory use from the set back requirements since the accessory use is a recreational amenity and as such may be exempted from the set back require- ments by the Design Review Board. This matter was reconsidered on March 27, 1975 at the Design Review Board Meeting, and the motion to exempt the pool from the set back requirements was approved unanimously. /jk U 10 DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT kr ll�lAavy SUBJECT:4 ACTION TAKEN BY MOTION: A VOTE: I MANAR �Wyrl- Mi P, .: SECONDED BY FOR: AGAINST J�m I APPROVED: Ull_a r T,rC AID PROU },n 1 _ OF THE BOARD A L I CA • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 1, 1975 A special meeting of the Design Review Board was called on April 1, 1975 to discuss the design of Blanche Hill's addition to her residence and the addition of cc mercial space under her residence. The Town Council asked the Design Review Board to make a preliminary comnent on the basic design aspects of the building additions. This preliminary comment is needed by the Town Council in order for them to make a decision on whether or not to grant the requested parking variance that is needed by Mrs. Hill before she can make the above mentioned additions, In general,the Board felt this addition would add aesthetically to the existing building and surrounding area, and it would not hinder the traffic flow or alter the proposed bike path. Dudley Abbott was worried about the proposed use of the ca mercial, space, and how that would affect Mrs. Hill's privacy. Doug McLaughlin explained that the commercial space would be filled up with the expansion of the ski rental and repair shop on the west side of the building, and the east side would house various "little" shops -- there was no restaurant proposed for this building. As there was no further discussion, a vote was taken for preliminary approval of the design of the Hill addition, with the condition that a full rendering and landscaping plans be submitted to the Design Review Board at a later date. Lou Parker made the motion for approval and Bill Hanlon seconded the motion, The vote was unanimous for approval. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 2:45 P.M. Members of the Board present: Dudley Abbott Bill Hanlon Lou Parker Bill Rouff others present; Jay Peterson Doug McLaughlin Bill Pierce • i -` - In U • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 3, 1975 1.00 P,M. 1. Racquet Club - Landscaping d 6V a g" -- a1 ter Kirsh 2. Larson Residence -- removal of a porch jp t4---/ -T Bill Rouff 3. Casino Vail -- variance a� -- Michael K. Arnett DE'SIGN HEXTEIV BOARD -)ATI 0, -� OF jklEl: M EIN I BE, R S SU13J1',,CT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPP OVER : -4 wrl DIS'APPROVED'. SUMMARY :', Ll 12 CANT 1fAN OF THE 130:1.11U i Ll DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETINIG P�3 I_ 2 11, MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN 13Y BOA_ RD ' MOTION: // �� SECONDED BY ' = -, � . FOR: 0 7 VOTE; OR : -- - - � � - - -- AGAIIvSTJ___._._...._..�___..�_ APPROVED: z/�C1r''J DISAPPROVED: SU1111,4ARY : ,tS,YPJ.�1.4AtV� , CJ DATE OF MEETING_� MhMBLIRS PRESENT SUBJE'CT'. I DESIGN REXIEIV BOARD ACTION Ti%KEN B MOTION: -SECONDED • VOTE: FOR: AGAINST Ar, APPROVED: D I SAI-)PROVED: a is AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 10, 1975 1. McLaughlin & Peterson sign appl icationa,'�0w1�'-d 2. Western Sports, Inc. sign application a,�rwtdl I l /P"n 7-1A 3. Crossroads Addition -- Landscape plan -1f�b/ �.� G� alali I -- Ron Todd Pot &1 5afPU a^c9 4. Wright /Vieli House �� ,<4 jv 'orno" lboo4cal)in? ' -- Jim Viele k �,6M1 5. Street Numbers --, signs wtv ��d Mike Carlisle 6, Golf Course Clubhouse sign,applicationLfiU441s't1j -- Bill Pierce • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY • VOTE: FOR:-- __ AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY, 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OY MO UT I NG x�� i MEMBERS PRESENT:_ 1' .GEC SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY .VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • e DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING �&)� -� b1EA1]3] ?,RS SUBJECT: _alo_ s �-r ACTION TAKEN I3Y OARD MOTION: SECONDED BY "% • VOTE: FOR: AGAINST r APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: �. vcLMi ///�. ��:Lc.vx ti_LL-_ jf %�1'� �l'.f�� !.C_/"L� .� -�--•- ��t`. '(jP`)--- •�-- �'1s..���_ :,;���� �'�--- � --�- -. - :1, %l�. R3 /1016 1 �� CI1 1��i11�.1 Vl:� iZ11• la}�C�LA1 A..— —�"- • } DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF 1IE'l iZING ' MEMBERS PRESENT: ',, !� yt A'f SUBJECT: ACTIOI3 TAKEN BY O MOTION: SECONDS VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED; DISAPPRU SUMMARY: D BY l APPROVED; DISAPPRU SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD L DATE, OIL MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: � ;ti -4 1,16,c , All'l SUBJECT: /o v v ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD' MOTION: Gt/ � SECONDED BY . VOTE: FOR: � � _ AGAINST APPROVED: LM22 z DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: lJ L ORM - I l NO of V box 100 vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD office of the town manager Gentlemen: I have reviewed the proposed signs for the house numbering system as well as their proposed placement, and I have no objection to them. You may consider this a letter of approval from the Public Works Department in regards to the placement of the proposed house numbering signs. KRR/ j k Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS A, �4�06 1: � r �- Kent R. Rose, P -,E. Director /,Town Engineer ,; DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING � � -27-�t ----- MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN B /Y� ABOARD : f MOTION: li(J C SECONDED iVOTE: FOR:� AGAINST • APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: : DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 24; 1975 1;00 PA af104'UV- 1. Gramshammer's patio extension 4vTG4 L"o Pep% Cramshammer 0,0 U 2.. 3. 4. Fitshugh Scott Residence resubmission of exterior stairs Liz Larson -- final house plans -- Bill Rouff Robert Myron_ Residence Lot 10 Potato Patch Bi71 Rouff 5. Tom Sanders Residence Lot 11 Potato Patch -- Bill Rouff 6. Paul McIntosh Residence Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village 13th Filing -- Paul Mcintosh 6//,1 up(", Vail Associates Trailer Vail Associates Shop -- Larry Allen /. M/ 0 E� 9. �� 4vn oll�i rzs /0' • Vail Associates Storage Fence -- Larry Allen All Seasons Patio Addition for William Kurtz, Jr. -- Stan Cole &ddt a o 4 Alw i'd' loY7 JJ cclae. lg'b'u-'4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MrETING MEMBERS PRESENT: suBjEur: !k4�_ - OXA-011" ACTION TAKEN Y ARD. MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST—____ APPROVED: D I SAPPROVED: SUMMARY: _J.4m� N � y DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF IIEET I NG MEMBERS PIIESFNT : __� - r SUBJECT: STS �f � L_ U J L9C�G u.0 ,� y- % ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: JA64z��- SECONDED BY'�_ VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:_ SUMMARY: AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OI i�iI�ETING t! _- MEMBERS PRESENT, r SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: /-L, -- - SECONDED VOTE: FOR.: - -�.� �. AGAINST- APPROVED: /7` DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Ir Y ►v� IAIRh1AN OF THE BOARD A'PIC'T' _- i a .. I 9t1da" DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING i�47-1-5 - MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY B AI�,.D MOTION: �[/f.�� - RSECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: _ _ AGAINST - - APPROVED: DISAPPROVED SUMMARY : Vl CHAII- A OF TIiF BOARD 9 DESIGN REVIEW BOATED DATE OF MEETING (i *L �I? MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BARD: MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: -_ T AGAINST-----.------- vtp APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF, PdEETING� .14Q4A=j MEMBERS PRESENT:_ `•'�-- --__ _ SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD : MOT ION: — SECONDED BY ^if VOTE: FOR: .. _ � AGAINST�� APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: C 3A 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MIEET I NG ? 9 5 MEMBERS PRESENT : —J &v4 -- _ cWAM,Aih"A W-1 r! ACTION TAKEN B BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY_,//01,, VOTE: FOR: _ _ AGAINST ew APPROVED : T DISAPPROVED: ' _ %I -� AJ66.0 Glyn .r'64 SUMMARY: -- MEMORANDUM TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: DIANA TOUGHILL RE: SPECIAL REVIEW OF VAIL ASSOCIATES PROPOSED SHOP BUILDING Vail Associates is in the process of requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a trailer to be enclosed in wood siding for use as additional space on their present shop and storage site. It was ray suggestion to them that they have the Design Review Board do a special preliminary review of the project because in my opinion it would not be approved. This will save a great deal of staff, Planning Commission and Town Council time if the building is reviewed now and found to be unacceptable; then an alternative structure can be submitted for the Conditional Use Permit which would be acceptable to the DRB. 10 Thanks. • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF 14F.33TIIvG .� MEMBERS PRESENT:_,k45 �___ --- k-t --- SUBJECT: 1, ACTION TAKEN i3Y OARD MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: �� AGAINST DISAPPROVED: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING- 40d, ��`�� MEMBERS PRESENT:- �-- SUBJECT: gill, FA ACTION TAKEN 13Y OARD : MOTION: SECONDED BY--� 10 VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED : �,.t � =„ ;�&t To DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: WNW- /► . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING -a-44� J / 76 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN 13Y BARD : MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: AGAINST._...._._______,.,_ -- APPROVED: iJ2ol2LA4 u4- DISAPPROVED:— SUMMARY : ,r OS THE A D I A" DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MAY 1, 1975 1:00 P.M. 1. Hill Building Addition V Aff ! 2. Lions Square North Sign, Treetop Entrance 3. 4. This Wicked West Bay Window Ti`reetops Stair 5. Rapps Gas Station Prelimary lJ/ 6. 0 Vail Trail 4 newspaper stands through -out town AW�Om- • 10 DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: TOR: AGAINST APPROVED: r T c, A nnnntYT, n Rod r� I * DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF jNlEETING____jj MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: v MOTION : -lh z� SECONDED BY^ � J VOTE: FOR: %'�'/Y AGAINST APPROVED: -�� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE, OF MEETING _�_ MEMBERS PRESENT: --- d SUBJECT: ACTION TAI {LN DY BOARD ; SECONDED MOT ION : �_ SECONDED I3YJ le VOTE : FOR : -���1L AGAINST- APPROVED: �i� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE of ,MEETING � NIEN113ERS PRESENT: --Jo SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: � SECONDED VOTE; FOR:_ AGAINST —Al_ APPROVED: D T SAPPROVED : l n /gym d .yl,4ArL DESIGN IGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING �J MEMBERS PRESENT.,_ SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION : SECONDED BY^�� ____ 0 VOTE: FOR: L& __ _._ _ _. AGAINST___.. -.- -_ C APPROVED: Ail DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 0 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING_jIlat - MEMBERS PRESENT: �UU SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: BY BOARD: v SECONDED BY iVOTE: FOR: AGAINST • Ya APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SU;1MARY: El DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING_ - MEMBERS PRESENT: .. z - SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR: SECONDED BY AGAINST APPROVED DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • DESIGN REVZEIY Bpi MAY 8, 1975 1:00 P.M. Aqirvd 1. Bighorn Construction:. Fireplace residence • V JI r��j 0.2 Ap j'nV 1 � 2. Tan Leroi : duplex, AWod 3. Performance Bicyle Shop: New windows Art,4. Vail 21: Fence • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD i DATE OF MEETING _ MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY MOTION: 9k&i27-. SECONDED VOTE: FOR: AGAINST_ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: BY �� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: SEGONDEI7 VOTE; FOPti : _!� AGAINST_ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: : • . 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE Or MEETING J d� a: MEMBERS PRESENT : - Eii V- SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: v MOTION: -J!�! SECONDED VOTE: TOR: AGAINST_ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: L -A DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING ^ - ----�- MEMBERS PRESENT SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: . VOTE: A • , /I i /l !7/ i1. DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: SECONDED BY —Ldllt - .._- -_._._--- AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MAY 15, 1975 1:00 PM 1. Village Center - Sign Program k &d -- Kurt Wolter 2. Vail Associates - Lionshead Terminal Build' g Display Box and Supergraphicl ,�, -- Bob Momsen � 3. Iron Kettle� �► P -&j atio �tensi n - -Pepi La.ngegger / 4. Vail Fare Department �r Enclosure of exterior stairway — Mike Carlisle �(q�lY3r 5. All Seasons 6. Holiday Inn Fence L. �v • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MFl TING � MEMBERS PRESENT; JA SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOAR`PI; MOTION: SECONDED BY •VOTE: FOR: .._._ _ �.� _ AGATNST�__ r� APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Si]..IPw3AIIY: (j DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING -- ---I MEN113ERS PRESENT: _4 41 XE�Z_ _44u ��- SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD; CY �n oj MOTION:— SECONDED BY VOTE. FOR: ._� AGAINST___ -. _.-... APPROVED: UL120aL&&L4& DISAPPROVED:- SUM,MA Z Y : � 42:D fG 6�c 4,L • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING -5 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION 'TAKEN BY OARD : ,MOTION:-_/ SECONDED VOTE: FOR:- AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: BY _�L 9 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: �fd1]/ tt _._ 1AA AL4 - - - SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY_ VOTE; FOR : — - -- -- - M AGAINST - -w APPROVED: _1 -- i DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: A P ICANT 0 11 r . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • DATE OF lll,,ET I NG MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD MOTION: SECONDED BY_V//?) VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: AGAINST r 10 10 ■. 1 Arthur Bishop s ho P - sign a p l i c a t i o n Q A ol 117 1 1�G -tip a i f l. Lvf:� -- � -- Keith Caroselli —M11 C,("k. � &t ., ft"i Q t 2. Rowe Residence -- addition . _ B. J. Rowe 3. Tivoli Patio 4. Meyer Duplex - addition) olzi -- Bill Rouff 5. Vail Associates - Lionshead Landscaping Plan _- J. B. Meadows 6. Office Supply1✓11� 1iG��r color changes to exteri(Ir 7. Town of Vail /'p - Summer Recreation Program sign -- Bill Pierce -° C o4Aen Pija jIf • 11 0 ' ik 1! - i., i 1 .1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING' / /9-7-5 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN of DvHKuj MOTION: VOTE: FOR: SECONDED BY AGAINST APPROVED: T T ['1 A TT77 11'f7Tit . ' CH I A Q TH 0 R )-, 1976 ��lv/ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD I A DATE OF MEETING l MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D/S�APP OVED SUMMARY: . >• ii PLICANT # DESIGN REVIEW BOARD i DATE OF MEETING QV?. / MEMBERS PRESENT: s 1� SUBJECT: ) ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: %� j MOTION: �L.r.. SECONDED BY tl VOTE: FOR: AGAINST 1 APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: i! s L 5 - DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: A 1�4A71nr SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: bm*c SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: V CHAIRMAN 0 THE BOARD w- LA r , u• DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: 1® SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1 APPROVED: % -'i a DISAPPROVED: 0 T A A III* I!� 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: X NVIIJ SUBJEC • ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD MOTION: SECONDED BY V[J VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: . DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • • � r DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING "1 19 k5 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: - �z6a61Ii Ix-c P- _ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ��nP 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD May 22,1975 1:00 P.M. (1) Sitzmark- stairway for V.A. Real Estate (2) V.A. compressor bldg.- Golden Peak (Michael Berry) (3) Timber Falls- fence for pool # (4) Gordon Rowe- greenhouse addn. (5) Hennessian addn. (6) Thomas Watson - addn. to Vail Townhouses (7) Arthur Bishop & Co. sign application (8) Calico Corner- Sign application (9) Hey! Colorado -Sign application P , (10) Sandstone 70- Bill Pierce (11) Village Center- sign program (12) Marren Pulis- house addn. (13) Hansel & Gretel- patio fence (14) Clock Tower -- patio fence • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING X�17,s --- MEMBERS PRESENT; SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING-- MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: a4tl�� VOTE: FOR: SECONDED BY AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:T_ SUMMARY: • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING_ --5-1,2 2- MEMBERS PRESENT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: y�`((1 SECONDE] VOTE: FOR: AGAINST e APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 7S - MEMBERS PRESEN'r : SUBJECT: (/ .77. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR SECONDED BY AGAINST APPROVED :� DISAPPROVED: �.P , A PLICANT • 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 0?02 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN 01 nv,#tsL ; MOTION: VOTE: a SECONDED BY FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; ZMAJ OF THE A-RD. APPLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING�.� MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: 9 MOTION: r w SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: G _ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: _... , CHA I AN F THE BOAR?_ L I CANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEET 7S MEMBERS PRESENT: 4114� SUBJECT: A4 ACTION TAKEN BY BOAR MOTION: SECONDED BY , VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW.BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: ;f SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING ��!�zI%S MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: - -- SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST ❑ APPROVED: 1 n T .C' A DUR (1V F.T) . U j j 1 i A PLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 412a-1'725' MEMBERS PRESENT: _ SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: -.: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST r APPROVED:? DISAPPROVED: ' SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 0 DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT:_ SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED By VOTE: FOR: AGAINST 1 4..:• c�v CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 0 z DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJ ACTION TAxuN ;Z�l u�ttli 4 MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST r APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: f � e • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING_ 1 02.2 75_ MEMBERS PRESENT: —_ -- SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN u� 1JVC3A4l/ . MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: 0 �� LSlt]li�llA n1'k Iva. J. AA/� -� APPROVED: lN1L�i1 e �_ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: :y DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PURPOSE is as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance Purpose: In order to preserve the natural beauty of the Town's site and setting, and to prevent indiscriminate clearing of property, removal of trees, and earth - moving and to attain the following objectives, exterior design of all new development and additions to existing development shall be subject to design review. 1. to prevent excessive or unsightly grading which could cause disruption of natural watercourses or scar natural landforms. 2. to ensure that the location and configuration of structures are visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and structures, and do not unnecessarily block scenic views from existing buildings or tend to dominate the town - scape or the natural landscape. 3. to ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the Town's overall appearance, with surrounding develop- ment, with natural landforms and native vegetation, and with officially approved development plans, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located. 4. to ensure that plans for the landscaping of open spaces conform with the regulations prescribed by this ordinance, provide visually pleasing settings for structures on the same site and on adjoining and nearby sites, and blend harmoniously with the natural landscape. On October 17, 1974 the Board,voted to make a policy statement as follows: The Board will not consider any matters without first having received staff review; and will not consider any remodeling, alterations, etc, without a letter of approval from the owner or owners of the building. LJ n DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JUNE 5, 1975 1 : 00 Phi 1. Vail Associatesl.�i.�1� Gold Peak Ski Buil it ng Remodel -- J.B. Meadows 2. Jose Muldune _ sign application -- Frank Day s 3. Morgan Duplex [� G�� a� t�.� �� j" 4. Medsker Residences -- Bob Medsker f V 5. Lions dead af1� l�lxz Miscellaneous Remodeling -•- Morgan Brooks % 6. Grand Prix Sign -- Brad Quayle 7. Le Cadeau - sign application -- Ton. Hatti o 8. Hellberg Residence /��,6 70par �� �. � �n /t& Final approval and change k ing Aea -- Steve Boyd ��. L124A i; u i� �. �r -i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JUNE 12, 1975 1. •Kiandra Landsca ing -- Bill Bower aw 2. Graphic Design Scandia Door and Talisman�or -- Bill Bower 4� P, 3. Colorado.Mountain College Kiln Addition 4"4,L4 -- Randy Milhoan 4. Sunburst Landscaping �� ,/ -- F.R. Orr 5. Grand Prix Restaurant Sign Application a, -- Brad Quayle 6. Warren & Sommer /��4/ Sign Application" -- Bill Wilto 0 7. J.N. Houston Frame Shop Sign Application --Bill Wilto 8. Vail Trails East Alteration, -- Tom Briner 9. Village Center Sign Directory -- Kurt Walter 10. Addition of Storage Areae j�p � -- Gary Wall `` 11. Monsoure Residence Fence Add i tin // ms f�- U-- Bill Monsoure 12. Jose Muldune CA Yl / Sign Daatiory, -- Frank ank Day 13. Sandstone 70 Staff House Modifications -- Lou Parker /4VtoV A.4,` 14. Dairy Depot Variance Request for personalized Private Parking Signs and Size of Signs -- Eve, E1 ias /�'� � „ / , � J DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Zvi SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OAR/D�,: ` MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: /,/_ j/'j DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Ni DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACT ION TAKEN MOTION: SECONDED BY 0 VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: / [l DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: 1A17, li-l' SUBJECT: W14 ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY ' VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Ell 1.10 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: Q o DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ____ • 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 7� MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: f ACTION TAKEN B B ARD MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: Ln GL DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Ll • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: 1 - / SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: t i t u DISAPPROVED: AGAINST BY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT : I l f SUBJECT: ^ 4 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: !/'L ITih�- DISAPPROVED: • L J DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING a MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE: FOR: N APPROVED: a DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AGAINST -.! � 1) A A CA" n U DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEET I NG MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT.- ACTION TAKEN ARD: �''� 6Ao'' `e r MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST r APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 1.10 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ZIA T 601v a V,l / DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING a MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY J'Ag6ef-6t _ VOTE: FOR: AGAINST 0'. / APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: IN NOM 4 d r 4 1! f ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT : SUBJECT: Id &W ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED, (� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: IvCHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ... WMA • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING I MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY RD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ORDIIN'— 110.9 (SERIES OF 1973) and Opj)I11A,CE NO. 4 (SERIES OF 1975) APPLICATION DATE ALLPUBLICATION DATE HEARING DATE 1 -M' milc FhE HEARING DATE FOR TOj'm7 COUNCIL I (we) i) of (Business Name) (Address) Vaii Colorado ,Phone # 476-9957 (City). (State) do hereby request permission to appear before the Design review Board to request Variance frcm Article Section�� Of Ordinance No. 9, Series of '1973 and /or Ordinance No. 4, Series of 19'75 for the following described business CLEAMy STATE THE PiAU)OSE ANU IN "i'i = OF T1:II S APPLICATION sti measure 12" x 18 ". See photos attached. plywood and stained to make them more stable an are metal and sharp, mounting them lessens c�pc�s�o. -c d rin cl6-We s_.- ?THAT DO YOU FEEL IS THE BASIS FOR HARDSHIP IN THIS CAST? 1. Economics Loss of business Non- convenient to customers when the four in and out spaces are utilized l - non -cus tome rs .�— -- 2. Physical threats Ka-1:1 an ed by males on two occasions insulted- -when my husband has helped & asked people to move som to fight —F. ni ess nterruption When one person is on duty, the confrontation leaves the n store uatten e -- shop li Ling, walkouts, and non - payment occurs and sales.rung up inaccurately 4. Public Relations rguements do not make happy guests or good customers to anybody _5i.gna - e of App ica nt _OW 1.0 MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board FROM; Department of Community Development DATE; June 12, 1975 RE: Variance Request for Dairy Depot After close review of Mrs, Elias's variance request application, we feel that her situation is not unlike many of the.-shops in Vail, i.e. the Tannery, Scandia, Crossroad's, the shops in Lazier's new commercial building, etc, granted, the- parkfng :. situation is unfortunate. The Vail Village Inn Commercial parking lot does hold 200 cars at a time and she is in a very central location within the lot. Even though most of Mrs, Elias's business is of a "quick drive -in" nature, if a space was not available in front of the store at most a customer would only have to walk. about two minutes from the farthest point of the lot to get to her store. Technically,the four parking spaces at the store front are not Mrs. Elias's; in her lease agreement, she was allowed four spaces and those are not necessarily in front of the Dairy Depot. Presently that area is marked private parking by very adequate signs,provided free of charge by the Police Department,and by using personalized signs it might be implied that the Police Depeartment is showing favoritism. If the Design Review Board decided to recommend that the variance request be granted, it might set a precedence for extra, unneeded signage. Even after careful review of Mrs. Elias's unique situation drive -in business), the Department of Community Development recommends that this variance request be denied on the grounds that the signs are nonessential. • fowl _ departmeol of poliso b o x 5 6 7 • v a l i , C o i o P a d o 8 1 6 5 7 • 3 0 3 + 4 7 6 - 5 6 7 1 June 11, 1975 Design Review Board Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Board Members: I have been informed that the Design Review Board is being asked to approve a personalized private parking sign, and I have some comments I would like to share with the Board. The Town of Vail the Police Depar private property only requirement with an official the Town. has in existence an ordinance which allows tment to remove vehicles that are parked on without the permission of the owner. The is that the property in question be signed sign, which is provided free of charge by I think it would be improper for a personalized sign to be in close proximity to or a part of an official sign, as a person could draw an inference that the Town was providing a special service for that particular business or person who had a personalized sign. I feel that all official signs should. be identical and in no way should they infer special treatment by a governmental body. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the variance application in question and future variance applications of similar nature be denied. Sincerely, Cary R. all Chief of Police GRW /csc I� June 10, 1975 The Design Review Board Mr. William Ruoff, Chairman Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Gentlemen: In order for my business to take advantage of the existing parking ordinance which requires that I properly notify violators by adequate signs, I seek a variance. Since I am a tenant in a basic complex {along with four other tenants} which is a public accommodations business, my agreement with the land- lord allows me four spaces. It is very confusing to the numerous guests or outright violators if the four spaces are not clearly defined for use by "Dairy Depot Only ". We have tried other signs reading "No Parking ", "Customer Parking" and posted two signs provided by the town on both sides to the entrance. This did not work as they claimed that they were customers meaning that they were either hotel guests or spending money at Gatsby's, The Hub Room, The Game Room, or leaving a car for Hertz, or they just claimed they did not see the signs. I also roped off the area, and that did not work either. I have operated the Dairy Depot a year and have provided one of the.few consistent services to many locals and guests on a sixteen -hour day, seven days a week schedule. They are able to obtain special needs at times when much of the village can only provide alcohol. By having a business that basically depends on quick, complete convenience to the customer which re- sults in quick and small sales, I must have the consistent parking available. If it is defined where people can understand it, this allows consistent ingress and egress. If violators do not know they are violating, three cars can diminish my sales by as much as 30 percent in a given day. I cannot afford this. My business is set up for one or two employees, and if one person is on duty and has to spend time outside patroling or dis- cussing parking, which always turns into an arguement, this discourages business, increases shoplifing, increases mistakes in ringing up sales. No one can operate or work efficiently in situations like this. It just is'nt healthy. The signs were ordered from the Vail Factory, and they were instructed to make them the size and color to comply with the sign ordinance. I said I needed a sign that clearly defined my needs. Since I have had these signs, which measure 12" x 18" and are mounted on wood to make them more stable and safer, I have reduced the number of calls to the police department for June 10, 1975 Page 2 Design Review Board ticketing or towing away. Through the season, I was constantly on the phone calling for assistance. Some of my calls were answered, but most were not. I feel that if I am granted this variance, it makes for better public relations. We have had many confrontations requiring police assistance beyond ticketing and including threats of violence. It makes it very difficult and frustrating to try and work and be polite and courteous to visitors when problems like this exist. The signs, I feel, are inconspicuous and blend in with the facade of. the .. building. I lease 1200 sq. ft., and there are 55 lineal feet . I sincerely hope that you will look upon this matter favorably. V-.� Encls. 10 Sincerely yours, Eve Elias (Mrs. Dick Elias) n u AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JUNE 19, 1975 1:00 PM ` ��a. GEORGE BOLT - Garage addition 2. HARVEST TABLE - Fence revision - McLaughlin /1 p er, µ d 3. HANSEL AND GRETEL - Sign /,ref, 4. WRIGHT /VIELE - Landscaping .plans IA-�-d 5. NORTHWOODS - Temporary construction sign _ Jen Wright 6. STRAWBERRY FIELDS - Sign 7. TEXAS TOWNHOUSES - 5B veranda - David Duval �1 8. COVERED BRIDGE STOREY- Trash enclosure 0 A DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: zz SECONDED BY � VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D i`SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: 0 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD le DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING /?;xz5" MEMBERS PRESENT: n. SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: 6 DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • a- � CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT 10 I• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING L 2z /�� MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: SECONDED BYE %/L�c�" VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 0 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 4 APPLICANT • r� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: �,_1�� SECONDED VOTE: FOR: // 2�ti AGAINST_ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: C HAIRMAN OF THE BOARD A PLI ANT 10 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING�v._ MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: _ MOTION: p TZJ SECONDED BY , . VOTE: FOR:- AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: -� Ott r / CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AAPPL CANT • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING / 7 MEMBERS PRESENT: d� SUBJECT: -- 4 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION:_. fi-� _ SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: v DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT • . . DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT ACTION MOTION: 2 SECONDED BY�� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD A. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: r ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: ��SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT :-e ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: �, SECONDED BY P(.��J . VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: V D I'SAPPROVED SUMMARY: • CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD A LICANT • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: f SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE; FOR: AGAINST APPROVED D I'SAPPROVED ; SUMMARY: i BOARD �- CHAIRhAN OF THE ICANT I * • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JUNE 26, 1975 1:00 PM 1. - Ric 's -sign a�lic - -- Rick Davis 2. Leroy Duplex Ga -- Relocation oT1ot' 3. Hennessian Residence Celler Door -- Mr. Hennesslan 4. Hennessian Residence Modification -of west elevation -- Mr. Hennessian X64-11 " . 6 Nlnv14aP."_ a� ,tau �a,C.�jofm 0,h 0-7- olvn G��M�t,C ,Z.u/Yd o raj a a6q cAA lobotl a- 6 kh DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J MEMBERS PRESENT: �T . SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: r MOTION :�� �(A� _ SECONDED BY • VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D I'SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRE SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE : FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: LZj)a,/2 /,6a0l_ -x4_ _„ _ D I`SAPPROVED SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING f qqD MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: l f ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D I`SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: P A DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING (P_ MEMBERS PRESENT: t JE T: / �G/�� SUB C �[.� GC/�i' wal ACTION TAKEN B OARD: MOT ION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED-,:- SUMMARY: a- L 1 FA • town of voi box 100 office of the town manager nail, colorado 81657 July 1, 1975 (303) 476 -5613 Mr, David R, DuVal 1214 Buchanan McLean, Virginia 22101 Dear Mr, DuVal Unfortunately, I have not been able to contact the builder for your proposed porch to let him know the latest outcome of the Design Review Board. I would really appreciate it if you would either send me the man's name and his address, or else when you talk to him next have him come in to the Town Office to talk to me, The Design Review Board-has heard Mrs. is Parker's objections to your proposed addition,and they would like more information from your builder. The revokation of the previous design approval is not to be considered a denial of the plans; they just felt that more complete information was needed, and I would like to schedule him into the next Design Review Board meeting as soon as possible. � 0 If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jr mer cretary to the sign Review Board /jk ` `` 9. r , -r,- -6N :'` INS S A '�5, CONNALLY & SMiTH .. � ', "' ATrtCiF;I , AT LAW y gg . el i FIRS'i QIT1r NA7't¢IQAL BANK B.l�iLpl.l!f0 - `.'� L :.' . T i HOUSTOTI -TEXAS 77002 0 �r a f' r--4a rC �. . 1 915 . - `', F r i T r x r' K - a v � �' w. . �� �, - w yam+ i ` �I AF .tiff "� - - .. . -. .. - _ - Y. 4-m. - - wt�Y .'E. ..t E {K. ,!W'. .,. '.� 4 ..:. .. SS A.. .. .... ... r�p -. ... — . .. ..' _ ' . .. . • _ 1. /I t . �€ P' ((yyamy =ice L4�'if :. %V _ y Le tp '@iQi ;r , 1. r y p Y ' y k/ ' o ite . f . I� i � �i , ,. '.. -..qR E.iTA'� - - ., sy�,y� r - - , - 11 _ a ,t C � . s. �� �';`9$'L$at ,R -�i �..• f A ii�iii[.W %,�'.1� ©41. ,�� .. eIR�.'.� - � � 4, # �� �X�� �tAd �:� icy r V�ri��7.��y V� .�F]i�' .� r�{�. , g�+a� �.p Ift Y�O - f _ f y - _�yQ ¢t _ J '�! f -� '_. .. uh -� ; ,. � . Yl'i@- iW.RF'�Fn '- �I' -�4L� r .. `sue ,' - �.}y* " �ytly t � -. `i�iii f4dG��/l� fir' � .V� 9pg��'' _. 16p tilt iw Sr -r * - , ^ :- - yy�lfli'. �� -SY sy . ug y,F�� AUrI44A6,' - �6y�f0y f ' +�q 7i9i4,fy�ry���y��F.i {�a��i�iFA'S Vi�_ fii RT �t �b� 1. - Mf1CF�F M�''$9fX�F�F�e+ V -�:.Ai Y'� :.'�71 - h Y -. .� fir! y{M. } Y� �I1!}/��y , yyy��� {{��yypp3. �f P `� k ��_ KI -_ ���. {_ -t - 2 }� • - � -� f - "' - - 1. .., . i, b )' 3 t � - _ � J - � . �.,� 9's£. F C d l' 4 9 3 ; S t Aifl4i� ST'i f+49�Ei �O �� r f i , +-rs}. .a. n+ .- in�l:F�33.,tiiAT'ftltR¢`: "'>a :',.'"%' �.•4..•C Ya. +S`v a(�.M1i• +AAGe4i R.. 1.'3r <wM�i -�'?� M, yours 1 11���LL f t } 4 A � £ t 22 3 s _ g z 3 f lit t lwopm j +rte* j. l t } 4 A � £ t 22 3 s _ u taws box 100 nail, colorado 81657 (303) 476 -5613 Mr, R. A. Seale, Jr. Vinson, Elkins, Searls, Connally & Smith Attorneys at Law First City National Bank Building Houston, Texas 77002 office of the town manager July 1, 1915 Re; No. 5B Oorecreek Townhouses, a portion of Lot 5, Vail Village 4th Filing, Town of Vail, County of Eagle, State of Colorado T David R. DuVal, Owner Dear Mr. Seale: In response to your letter of June 25, 1975 in regard to your client, • Mr-. C, T, Parker's objection to the proposed balcony of Mr, DuVal, I have a number of comments; 1, The Building Official has not throughly looked at the structural plans of.the proposed porch, but he foresees no structural problems that would either pose'a perilous situation to both property and life or have the possibility of collapsing, 2. The.applicant has received previous approval from the Design Review Board and has also applied for a building permit, but after the last meeting of June 26, 1975, the Design Review Board decided to revoke the previous approval of June 19, 1975 because of -insufficient information; The applicant is to appear before the Board again either on July 3, 1975 or as soon as practicable. His building permit will not be issued until he gets final approval from.the Design Review Board, 3, The builder and designer of the DuVal add tion: when questioned about the destruction of landscaping, in particular an eight foot evergreen tree, said that he would be willing to cut a hole in the balcony for the tree to grow so that it would not ihave to be cut down, but he said that your client was not very accomodating or receptive to the new idea, • Mr. R. A. Seale, Jr. July 1, 1975 Page Two You are correct in your assumption that we will not isssueaadbuilding permit to Mr. DuVal until he gets Design Review apprroval than that Building Official has checked the plans throughly, other we have no jurisdiction if the structure is sound and the design has been approved, It is not our responsibility to contact interested parties when a building permit has been issued, but in this case we will notify Mrs.. Parker as to the Design Review Board's decision in this matter, If you have any further questions in this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, Ij k cc: (1) Mrs. C.T. Parker 424 East Friar Tuck. Houston, Texas 77.002 Design Review Board Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 (3) .Mr. David R, DuVal 1214 Buchanan McLean, Virginia 22101 (4) Ms. Diana Toughill Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81697 DEPARMTENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT al jes/ r mer cretary to the i gn Review Board • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 3, 1975 1100 PM 1. Vail Associates� revision of stairway for Real Estate Office -- J.B, Meadows 2, McMillan Residence il house plans t.. 0 -- Bob McMillan 3. Buckley Residence house plans Bob Buckley 4. Meyer Residenm, site plan revision 5. Shei ka Is sign appi I ion review • 6, Utter Residence i z z Stone work,and fence Jay Utter • r� DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACT ION TAKEN v 1 �vriLu" . MOTION: , __ SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVED: D I'SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: �,�rarr.. 3c A I NT �,�rarr.. 3c n U DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD r- � �W-A F�Ar� � � � SUBJECT: C ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: • VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: D IZAPPROVED SUMMARY: __ SECONDED BY AGAINST • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD r j 12) Zg 7 5 DATE OF MEETING , MEMBERS PRESENT : SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: T' MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Z(-)- �22 .7 I* DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF '4A S3 MEMBERS SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE; FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D I'SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD !ATE OF MEETING ..� �. MEMBERS PRESENT: kA A- �i SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: AGAINST - - f- f'a- zs`.,-,`.-- - APPROVED: 04-.4-0 1 DISAPPROVED: , • � sp DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION TAKEN F3Y BOARD MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: Q DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 0 ♦j • r I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 10, 1975 1:00 PM 1 . Vail Associates "4-10" 4V Landscaping plan for Landmark -- J.B. Meadows 2. Vail Associates Landscaping plan for Vantage Point -- J.B. Meadows Allv-u m-w 3. Cyrano `s proposed lighting (�,p�ta��c �� �` ��,�,�„� IL & menu box a�� �� 1L4vk -- Corey For e berry 4. Vail Associates �I Northwoods Traivy, �i�c-c�I -- Jen Wright 5. The Wren /Wj sign application, directory & sign program b. The Glass Rainbow Shop sign application A"e"X and Village Center 7. DuVal l Porch Addition � Ar Texas Townhouses 5B 8. Shepard Duplex z i/%1 uCr6"' '( :° (Y-/ -- Ken Wentworth 9. Creative Hands Unl imi ted Qfl�.o "-4 sign application 10. Don Marks duplexC��� -W ati[ c HAPPY BIRTHDAY BILL /,rte a/.r�►�p1,�� fla, M i DATE OF MEETING i MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACT ION TAKEN MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: It AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: � t I,.- WCHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD /Al T I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: h y,,,�fOi _ / /,��f-�-T- SUBJECT: D Vail) ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: 6r MOTION: -742161�!.SECONDED VOTE: FOR: i AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Vr CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD A P I &CA T - 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT : % �f�l l/ /d . / ,I G? fif /i 7z" SUBJECT: �1 �7T1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR; tl AGAINST APPROVED : _�z DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ' %t% Le CHAIRMAN O THE BOARD r. �z>ze� A PLICANT I* DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY } VOTE: FOR: , AGAINST APPROVED: /z � DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD A PLICANT E I• DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: ^r,W_ AGAINST APPROVED :�� DISAPPROVED: • SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN F THE BOARD AT PLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: U MOTION: SECONDED BY V VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: h DESIGN REVIIW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: :J SUBJECT: / 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: f SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: �t AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED : A .. • SUMMARY: \/jt�CHAIRMAN O 0 1 A PLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: A SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BX BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: k b) F I . lo DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 9 MEMBERS PRESENT: r SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY / VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST 10 1 I� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING" MEMBERS PRESENT, SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OAR MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: By-A-1 �l AGAINST lAwCHAIRMAN OF TIM, BOARD APPLICA,&T 'k • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 44-471-� 0 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D I'SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: CMG CHAIRMAN OF THE B( l� 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: U MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR; i AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: iE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD --:! , " � , �::, � _� a - A PLI i T . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 24, 1975 1:00 PM }, Creative Hands Limited✓ ��'rt— sign application _ 2, Alains Care %�A window modificat of n -- John Eden 3. Powers Residence /���� chimmney & window's' I -- Charles Powers 4, Village Market 6,017 Addition " "7��_ -- Jim Mortor S. Wi 1 son Duplex qp4 addition . - Bob Wilson 6. Mi 11 Creek Court "T &n w replace stairs addition to prevent parking in court area -- Steve McDow 7. Mountain Haus / p1"ta.01 674 window cha M -- Dan Hogan. 8. Turquoise Gallery" " sign application / -- Check Queen 9. Northwoods "C" Building / swimming pool and additio -- Jen Wright 10. Vail Associates o"oLt -t-a resubmission of Ldndmark Landscaping plan -- J.B. Meadows • �J DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING I MEMBERS PRESENT r SUBJECT: YA24 EZZU. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: w MOTION: SECONDED BY -4 VOTE: FOR: It AGAINST ZZ nr IrjG€ __ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 4 I _ /' , �� i DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: 0 AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: .. • SUMMARY: mr 4 �.� DESIGN REVII,W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: 7 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE; FOR: tc AGAINST APPROVED: DI "SAPPROVED: SUMMARY: r THE BOARD i A PLICANT L6 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Ala&- r SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OAD: MOTION: SECONDED BY/�/� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST a APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 9 DESIGN REWIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: V MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST 't] APPROVED: e�r DISAPPROVED.: SUMMARY: IR14i N OF ISO .F 10 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: "I /t //3 a :. _ — //i; ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: t AGAINST APPROVED:�� DISAPPROVED: • 'r A PLICA T po 6 ox 4� DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ,k DATE OF MEETING 9;7��� ,.1 MEMBERS PRESENT: ■ - . ., f SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: e SECONDED BY _—_ VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: CIIA�MAN/OF T AP LI NT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: A r� SUBJECT: !� .� l �i/�sY�rv1 � ✓ ACTION TAKEN BY%` BOARD : MOT ION:- / SECONDED BY_A/ k/ VOTE: FOR: -` AGAINST APPROVED: x DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: A PLICANT i� • I . I' DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: � SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR:s AGAINST ax mz=�T-, APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ae CHAS OF THE BOARD —.f ICANT -- T- DESIGN REVIEW BOARD July 17, 1975 1:00 PM 1. The Wren sign (,�,e -r� cx� super graphsc j0� w�t� directoryl�l�..�,1 -��i�y sign program -ffl,66d 2. Vail Associates N�, ct-,.K q 1 -vc�-, ,o fly G.f, resubmission of landscape plan for Lan ar ��� -- J.B. Meadows�� 3. L i f t Ho u s e elln f� sign application 4. Young Ho School of Karate��,� A4���,t� sign application 5. Marks Residence�.� -- Don Marks QC�iuf� 0 G. Larese /Oberlohr Duplex --- Heine Larese P4,4 c,L4-d 7. A Place on Earth y�� window revisions/� --- Ron Todd 8. McMillian Residence -- Bob McMillian 9. Staufer Residence(r� -c addition of GreenhoG -- Diana Toughi l l 10. Creative Hands Unlimited resubmission of color scheme for sign • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING ,{ t 4� i 3 MEMBERS PRESENT: r /V/,zt SUBJECT: N. -Al ----_ 4 -RJ 16 t A C-A0 (L _- -- - ACTION TAKEN BY )30 RD: r MOTION: �� SECONDED BY, • VOTE: TOR: AGAINST APPROVED : Lia Z) I DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: C 9A OF T AR aSjimm, 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: zu SUBJECT : h (A/ ` . ACTION TAKEN ZARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY�� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED :%%`l6,% 12 Z ano aL;t4 DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING f MEMBERS PRESENT:� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN I3Y� ARD : 1� MOTION. �,�1% (.- , _ SECONDED BY , ) . VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: .( OWNS, . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT; J SUBJECT: /C� %��L �.T�.�'i.{� •r c ACTION TAKEN B OARD: MOTION: �� SECONDED BY'd _ VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: llAIRMAN O BOAR % APPLICANT . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: SECONDED BY MOTION: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT ' Y~° ACTION TAKEN B OARD: MOTION: �� SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: /1 �� , 1 ti7_ -1,4 f7 rem 0(.yd . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J 'AiivMEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD; MOTION; SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY; r f9 . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 19z} i MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: /Q ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: �,�Q _ �� SECONDED BY iVOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ■ 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT. SUBJECT: ACTION.TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: , �� SECONDED BY 'ell , . VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: (g DISAPPROVED: . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING (l MEMBERS PRESENT; izz SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR: #� SECONDED BY AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: -- C A h 0 H OA ��e -APPLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 31, 1975 1:00 AM 1, Writer Residence Fence Addition �ali71 l 2.. Colorado Mountain College roof addition for kiln -- Randy Mi l hoan V U �� 3. Mill Creek Court -- Jack Curtain 4. Vail Associates r?IG'9.j'7 relocation of real estate sign I -- J.B. Meadows 5. All SeasonsG patio addition -- Stan Cole • 6. Carver /Dodge Duplex addition r1 4 -- Dan Hogan �W v V 7. Bachmeier Residence fence addition A �4,cdl -- Mr. Bachmeier r 8. Borwick Residence addition of storage C lose and windows -- Doug Walter 9. Casino Vail �If 6u -°/ addition of fire exit - Dave Garton 10, Valley Forge ik44 addition of sh window DK6 11. HelIberg Res idence ,,t4 kQ-Cll change in retaining 4111 Herman Hell berg, 12. Fitzhugh Scott Residence addition of foot bridge DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: J(,Q L4, AtA SUBJECT: XW)id-7A - ACTION TAKEN BY WARD: MOTION: is SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 7 4' MEMBERS PRESEN : SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: SECONDED BY AGAINST J DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J MEMBERS PRESENT: I )/",v6j SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: _SECONDED BY VOTE; FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I ', /� w p,I� hj n_j ae9l if DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT; Cpl lr J SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: ' MOTION: SECONDED BY -. VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: i i� DESIGN REVIE BOARD ' DATE OF MEETING 5. . i MEMBERS PRESENT: 5, 6:4 SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD: MOTION:s SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD , DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: PA .SUBJECT: A ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: TOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: J C1 ( / L J (✓ CL c t- • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF '7P MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: / ACTION TAKEN XOARD:�'`�'ltirn® MOTION := SECONDED BY -,6bZ�2 &2!== VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DATE OF MEETING_ ` C MEMBERS PRESENT: • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBJECT: A�d 9CJ- ACTION TAKEN BY B RD: ,A MOTION: I� SECONDED BY • VOTE: FOR: AGAINST • APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: v� 7 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING /, MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN �� ,�v�n�: MOTION: d2,-1 SECONDED BY g"J]�e VOTE: FOR: AGAINST ( joj2/ j 1 llotj- APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: 10 Ati INC, Of 01" DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Z-o A- 6LZU-- SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: /`"`'� �!?9 MOTION: 4 SECONDED BY �d VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: t/ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: i s !I • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT:1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY . . i1 n DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 7' MEMBERS PRESENT: is t - 1 r.' M r J �} SUBJECT: �✓ G7 ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: �� SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST �r �i r ` APPROVED: nTQADDR/l17V..il —APPLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING i MEMBERS PRESENT: . Wv , F r s° SUBJECT : ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: �� SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST le � i. ff An-roam V APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD August 7, 1975 1:00 PM 1. Kurz Retaining Wall 2. Strauch Residence -- Jan Strauch 3. Goldsmith F 4� sign applicition-for Village Center 4, Scott Residence,9 Foot Bridge 11 1 e 5. All Seasons Patio Addition -- Stan Cole 1 6. Ski Museum do-x, � I conceptual design'/ -- Bill Pierce Y DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: �- fly----- --.�_ - - ' t SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD :�� MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: :Y SUMMARY: • CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT /I/ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESEN T: ` -' SUBJECT:'' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: .� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD L C NT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING fiF '' J MEMBERS PRESENT: .SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: _%�} /�rJ1`� _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR,: AGAINST APPROVED: c� " DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT G APPROVED: c� " DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT 0 A r DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETINGW&011,NZ S MEMBERS PRESENT: r t SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY� B ARD MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: &__ Z, SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD' MOTION: 7 SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD A?M XT 6,t;-X V y 3 . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J"( MEMBERS PRESENT: • SUBJECT: /) lz <7,4atwn ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: _Iwy�-~ nTRAPPRnuRns CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD X,.7' 7 r� L DESIGN REVIEW BOARD August 21, 1975 1:00 PM 1. Alains Cafe 0-tj Glass Entry 4 -- John Eden 2. Vail Associates addition of sery 'c elevator for Gondola II 3. Lift House V a r i ance t ?&in Ord inance -- Packy Walker' 4. TaIismar�f� Office! Ad i ion -- Linda Bower 5. Casino stairs QUe�y . o -- Dave Garton �jj 6. Vail Custom Jewelers change of materials �),) 'a -- John Blumberg J/,] G�,-na 7. Row Houses additional loft apace raising the +r to add -- Jay Peterson S. Ri verhouse Land scapi ng�60t e 9. Writer Residence addition of a pat_1�6 -- Darren Writer 10. Writer Residence 4U--0/ addition of a stofa e area -- Darren Writer 41 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: _JIJ 1" 3 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD:: MOTION: _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: �- DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: &M nFi' 'f'HU RP-"-nl A15PL RP-"-n ICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • DATE OF MEETING • MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J MEMBERS PRESENT: TiL SUBJECT: LA ACTION TAKEN BY ARD; MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: as .,h,h,x/. d • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: A, SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD; MOTION: SECONDED BY '- VOTE; FOR: AGAINST MIXR FA �i APPROVED: _ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: l- DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETINGAY4.t MEMBERS PRESENT: .SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD; MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: (L O� N OF THF!t=B30AR VAL2I C PT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 5- MEMBERS SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE; FOR: APPROVED: ,,rnn n[TVT'%. SECONDED BY AGAINST �4— -�o • DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION. SECONDED BYAjk As VOTE: FOR: AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVED:_ I __ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I Ell 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING j MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: --- l ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: / MOTION: SECONDED BY . VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: i� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: D APr•Ot SUMMARY: "",*fvooa�Alv, C �ry A L ANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING ,C MEMBERS PRESENT: lJ� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CH Rb9 k PL I C�AQNTT s i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD August 28, 1975 1:00 FM 1. Blue Co' 4� -c� lower ent y door 2. Kri smara��licc c� change o ntry 3. Vail Associates addition of a de ay t Gondola II 4. Medsker ResidencV/10-111-om change of plans 5. Frericks Res idence `VJr� -, //�, addition of a fence -- Vic Gallina %l)fte_ b. Heltsley Residence ������" • modification and addition of windows - Trisha Heltsley 7. The Shop of the Golden Bear sign application lgl� C/ -- Tom Hollis 3, Saunders Residence �.j�;��1���,(�I,� p/ n LJ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • tt �� DATE OF MEETING 4. J MEMBERS PRESENT: .SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OA D: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY A D : `' MOTION: D SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST 4 r APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: / A P CANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING C4 O MEMBERS PRESENT: fi .SUBJECT: 1", ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: daX MOTION: SECONDED BY 5 VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: �y DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 4 gi >% MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED :� I _ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: Ael�Aj —2 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING �- p�� s MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: : -44--L �2 �-- _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING c,29 �7)I r MEMBERS PRESENT: .SUBJECT: L�� v C ? / ACTION TAKEN BY RD: : � ,nc d)A)4 � � � � �� � " ./ MOTION: _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: FIIAN�:OF THE LICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING l S' MEMBERS PRESENT: .SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: OF THE BOARI SECONDED BY AGAINST P I C� t T • DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .SUBJECT-.,, t %C� ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: ✓G} `_�.� / /C�y% ��r%1�/ �J DISAPPROVED: y I t; DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA September 11, 1975 1. K-4 School Design --,XAe (IL -- Tom Brinere� �LOrx�/ 2. Row Houses Southern Bali°o 7 ,��lr.t rS'es 3. Laughlin Res idenc P—C, Addition 4. K a nd r 4a ou,;La Trash St r ge 5. .The Shop of the Golden Bear, sign application 7106'0-61. 6. Saunders Residence Revised Plans 7. Foreign Connection sign applicationly-el'-e� ,.8. Printery /Westview sign program directory, 9. Larose /0berlohr Landscaping Plans 10. The Top of the Slope ,x -t stain glass door. 11. Lionshead Center Buildingt�� addition of display window for Gondola Sports addition of entry for A1fie Packers 1 C,Ir DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING!", `� ? MEMBERS PRESENT: -11vA- A14 SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE: , ,/A/)i/)la, , 4 _ APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: f IRMAN OF 4F- .BOARD A PLICANT �dk i� \\ \. DATE OF MEETING .7Y SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: SECONDED a/ .0 VOTE: FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: . . . . ........ ................................ ------------- \� AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING J MEMBERS PRESENT; • SUBJECT :ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: q MOTION; _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: F APPLICANT I• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS .SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY AR MOTION: _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED:- DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: /loAll JVlt)V Z6 L A CZY .SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BO RD: MOTION: � SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD j DATE OF MEETING / MEMBERS PRESENT: a SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION: _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: "/ I w DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Z)jj/ ,via SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BO RD; MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: rCH iA OF THE BOARD A -L` • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETIN MEMBERS SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED! DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS -SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: SAN OF T-HE E • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: r--' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: h1e) SECONDED BY - VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: _ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I s�: DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: _SECONDED —dhL&— AGAINST BY 0 VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: nTCAVPRnVFD * fir A LI NT DATE OF MEETING_� MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Y,,iBOAR I I ACTION TAKEN 13 D I fn C MOTION: AikA- - SECONDED VOTE: FOR: I Ldp APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST BY_.j" A PLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • AGENDA ',September 1$, 1975 } , Sitzmark Pati WC/ -- Bob Fritch Jal'I 2. Billups Residence retaining Wall -- Vic Ga11 i n a �A&Af 3. Kurz Residence W Gu-dl Landscaping & pa(r ing Ludwig Kurz ��% 4. Rucksack U`{� new doors End covered area -- Ken Wentworth 5. Vail Interfaith Chap6l. addition of a rectory 6y/" -- pierce, Briner& Fitzhugh Scott . 6. Westwi n utility enclosure 7. Vail 21 Building addition of plans and benches 8. Caramba Residence OV-1-4 lt'41d -- Bob Ruder 10 • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT:] SUBJECT: °- "`''° ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: 0 SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST M-4 APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: . C H� IAMICANT � 0 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEET I NG f'� l MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN I3Y ARD MOTION: :: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: nTGADDROURT) • DATE OF MEETING • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BYw�4 -�1-� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD T /e)L- DESIGN REV I.EPW BOARD DATE OF MEETING U S MEMBERS PRESENT: C� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: � MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: I z DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETINGi J MEMBERS PRESENT; AZ _,z dij Ca SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: IFOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: f . CH OF THE BO LICANT AJ U DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING LJ MEMBERS PRESENT: 1 SUBJECT: (� 9� ACTION TAKEN BY BOA D: MOTION: �i SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST • APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I* DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: G4" .-A -4/, SUBJECT: - ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: ga4 MOTION: Lh, SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGEPA Septembev 25, 1975 1 . Larese /Oberl hor Residwce Landscape Plans --- Heine Larese �� � 2. The Gold & Silversmith Shop sign application 3. Billups Residence change in retainin f1all --- Vic Gall ina 4. Ski Museum, - - Dudley AMA Ge 7. win A7,0baA A(? a e,//0// 7-/ p'-4- • • DESIGN REVIT-�W BOARD DATE OF MEET ING - 73 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: __ SECONDED . BY . �G VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: J SUMMARY: ,vL! CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPLICANT\1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: A)&,ZL2441� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY —dXz�� . VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: r/ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD d k 3K) DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING i MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT : ACTION-TAKEN BY QARD MOTION. A _ 2_ _SECONDED VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST A L I NT DESIGN REV I I"W BOARD DATE OF MEETING > MEMBERS PRESENT: 1 SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: SECONDED BY MOT ION: �- -- -- -- VOTE: FOR: L AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: JL CHA I MA OF 'I HE BO Rr, r APL CANT K El. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: p SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 10 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 7 � DATE OF MEETING T MEMBERS PRESENT: ZA P ° SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD r DESIGN REVIEW BOARD �-f DATE OF MEETING S MEMBERS PRESENT; SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: J ' , CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AP9LICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda October 9, 1975 1. Fitzhugh Scott Residence change in window —,�;6WXA00t. 2. Casino-41 - e44 ,W� addition 6f sliding glass door -- Rob Garton 3. Cyrano 's trash enclos r6 4. Remodel of Harvest Table �, change in south elevation(r/w` -- John Eden 5. KVMT Radio Station �f,�` addition of microwa -- Jim Chabin 6. McClean Residence . alterations%lG,�;'� -- Norman McClean 7. fowlers of Vail sign application,/��i��l -- Mr. Fowler 8. Town of Vail Entry Sign �L���% -- Bill PierMeol 9. Davis Residence f color changel'�'G w DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: )v SUBJECT: 7 z-- liva al e, — / i/ &1aC� ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: ,9�- MOTION: /} _SECONDED VOTE: FOR: AGAINST" APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: c • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING y 7 MEMBERS PRESENT; SUBJECT: f ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY Ail VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: • r. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 7 2_ " MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: 7 h SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST A/ A, - APPROVED: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING Q MEMBERS PRESENT; '6 SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY RD: MOTION: SECONDED BY 1 VOTE: TOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • DATE OF MEETING 10 MEMBERS PRESENT:,t 4'a y I SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: a MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: zl DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 7iT MEMBERS PRESENT. )j 1716 SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: J I A PLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • DATE OF MEETING 10 MEMBERS PRESENT: _ SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD; MOTION; SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING % �S MEMBERS PRESENT: /7 I' XW SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY r VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 0 DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY -,, J (,� VOTE: FOR: _ AGAINST DESIGN REVIEW BOARD I* APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: _ • 46RCAIT • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA October 23, 1975 n 1. Colorado Mountain College . enclosure of stairway Randy Milhoan 1�el" 2, Colorado Mountain College addition of kiln roof yX -- Randy Milhoan f 3. Larkin Apartment extension of balclofiy in the Mountain Haus • . - Dick Gustafson 4. Vail Communications Corporation addition of antenna on Hilton r/0" 5. Colegrove Residence landscaping plan . 6. Casino Building(�C -e modification to e fire exit - Rob Garton 7. 9 Gorsuch Ic.c.. sign app�cat ion S. Ultimate Spectacle / 49,'Vlc% sign application /!d Z4,9- • 9. Cyrano's Trash Enclosure -- Cory Fortenberry • DESIGN REV71?W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT:^ • SUBJECT : '1 ACTION TAKEN !3Y BOARD w. MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST ,r r APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: `7 ^,� F DESIGN REV)FW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY : MOTION: OARD SECONDED BY VOTE. FOR: APPROVED:) 1� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST moll, Ti DESIGN REV].r;W BOARD • ;'` DATE OF MEETIN ,�S MEMBERS PRESENT: J� ,r �y{•i' ry w F 1:tii. ze }tr r` �f1y, SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: y MOTION: SECONDED BYf�l� VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST APPLICANT ra.., DATE Or MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REV ] f ;;W BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE. FOR: APPROVED: j� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST .Y R' .nr x `,\ ; vi• •r =k . DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REV ] .I ;,W BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY BOUD : MOTION: Al� SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: nT .qADPPnVRn' APPLICANT DESIGN REV I r;W BOARD DATE OF MEETING r/�. p� MEMBERS PRESENT: f mw�__m SUBJECT:/ %kljtto_— ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD:. MOTION: SECONDED VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST I3Y�1//f /yam �T qua•:' DESIGN REV ]-),',W BOARD DATE OF MEETING T Lea MEMBERS PRESENT: ,�L SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY OARD: " MOTION. SECONDED BY �( �f �, VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: AGAINST DESIGN REVD .F;W BOARD DATE OF MEETINC� MEMBERS PRESENT:ZL.� SUBJECT: /t - ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION:, SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: • is DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda October 30, 1975 1. Muth Sports sign applicat on -- Jerry Muth 2. Purcell'sQoapx� addition orf a vestibule -- Bill Purcell 3. Gerards sign appi cation -- Bing Lee 4. The Ultimate Spectacle sign application --- Jason Peterson 5. ShroyerIspW 6�,_Uo change in 4,6dge Arcade storefront 6. Shroyer I s/,dp��.iLLO0 sign appli//c�tion 7 The Lodge at Vail((� addition of winds eeV patio 8. Peter Young Residence 14z� addition of a carport'} Paul Clark DESIGN REVI F:W BOARD DATE OF MEE TING j'/0 — MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY•BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY�)//6 VOTE: FOR: AGAINST sir sff� APPROVED: te_�— DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I s DESIGN REV .1 11' W BOARD DATE OF MEET I N -�V 1 MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 'v V IRIy'AN` OF THIP BOAR ASP ICAiI DESIGN REV) I:;W BOARD DATE OF MEET I NGao - MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: 4A, ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: SECONDED BY MOTION: v9 VOTE: FOR: AGAINST .k "y" APPROVL DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 11 A --'P- PLICANT DESIGN REVlMW BOARD � oppm. •ti DATE OF MEETING L 02� .y. `I� � MEMBERS PRESENT: I J ` BJEC• ,.. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: .:' MOTION : J SECONDED BY rr VOTE: FOR: AGAINST 1'va R APPROVED DISAPPROVED: 'I Flo IJ SU MARY : oppm. •ti DESIGN Rl�V1ISW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT 4 .6-d24fZ& SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOAHD ; MOTION: !1 SECONDED By VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ;�P��c_c�C.t' CJ' C IRhi N OF TH - BOAF LI CAN � �. r.. .(�r ?fir DESIGN REV] ll�W BOARD DATE, OF MEETING.l 'Ojalz MEMBERS PRE SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN MOTION: VOTE; FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SECONDED BYAJ,'I) AGAINST DESIGN REV 1 f,,W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: hy SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY I30ARll: MOTION: SECONDED l3Y VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AIR AN OIL - . -]30A D AGAINST I. it DESIGN RbV) kW BOARD DATE OF MEETING /9-� �,- MEMBERS PRESENT cy//�Zjy 17) Tb SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR:, AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: AN APPLICANT LIC ANT Al- 3W Special Meeting DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • Agenda November 10, 1975 1. Crossroads of Vail Building Identification sign -- Ron Todd 2. Crossroads East Sign Program 4lv� -- Ron Todd /" 3. Crossroads East sign directory -- Ron Todd 4. Crossroads of Vai 1q��,W wd directory for total complex -- Ron Todd 5. Connell Residence I yji^. � z 4, �p� preliminary review - 0" % • -- Al Connell 6. Colorado Mountain Cge kiln shed -- Randy Milffoan 7. Colorado Mountain College�G� submittal of materials for stairway -- Randy Milhoan S. Vail Associates j 4t4,/ real estate sign for Lionshead Office 9. Ski Museum Gad alternation tb roof line -- Dudley Abbott • a• p� i; DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING ,ICJ MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT 4f � � /h;B J°w0�✓ yeo�wl ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY Zw Ak��- VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: ]� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST CHAIRi41 N OF THE-BOARD PLICAi�fT ,a . y. r• .yr �.x1ti ;aur; DESIGN REV S 1 :4 BOARD DATE of MEETING MEMBERS PRESENr. SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: r ) MOTION: / _SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: i APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST A II ' CHAIR1�lA "` OF THE BOARD PLICAi�iT 4 DESIGN REV 1 I�,W BOARD DATE OF MEETING w� 4 MEMBERS PRESENT: r ACTION TAKEN BY BARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY; IRMAN OIL THE- AGAINST W PPLICANT S J ;..l,' 3 =r'� t X'. • DESIGN REV) 11'W BOARD DATE OF MEETING 1 , 11 /L_ MEMBERS PRESENT: ACTION TAKEN IBY B, JOR D MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: „s Q A 1]DP(11T1+.T) - AGAINST G F TIZI'BOARD A PLA T F. rt ,:.. h 4 . r •� DESIGN REVIITV BOARD DATE OF MEETING -_ MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN I3Y BO RD : MOTION: D SECONDED J3Y VOTE: FOR: 1Al 1?iiYJOfc�_ APPROVED: _-- .., ---r Vrr. r%. AGAINST V'4 DESIGN REA?Yl,;W BOARD DATE OF MEETING .S k MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: M 0 T 10 N : eo SECONDED BY VOTE', FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: AGAINST ri- 4` 'f is by } f: L :f DESIGN REV] I ;W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: M OTION: SECONDED BY Zjl— Z� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: -- DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: s +.. :�ki7'c re' 1`S��3Ye .- ;I. *'L Hit t' DESIGN REV) li'W BOARD ( �� DATE OF OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN b x DukluD . '/v MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST A" APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: ZRMAI� OF THE' JP2AeAI T F M J.F , DESIGN REV i l ',W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: � r SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: 4 MOTION: D SECONDED BY ,✓ VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRhS N OIL TH�' BOARD AGAINST NEAR ROOM �W.WN-1m, • U DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda November 13, 1975 1. Gondola Sports sign variancexem/zt-n � �J --- Garrett Smith 2. Garton's Bridge Street Saloon_ sign applications -- Dave Garton ((�� 3. Vail Tobacco ,�L�' sign applica�Yi ' 4. Power's Residence � stairway and parkffig area --- Charlie Powers 5. Head First ,,t�.(v y� modilicatioA !t"o stairs 6. Donovani's w sign applic ions 7, printery /Westview-/%�o modification to sigh program S. McLean! Residence submission of material�`�` 1�1 DESIGN RE;V) rW BOARD DATE OF AIHETING /3 CA- MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: / A, ACTION TAKEN ��'/ BOARD: MOTION:, �// SECONDED BY , VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: : DESIGN ICE 1 1,:W BOARD DATE Or MEETING, _k4Z MEMBERS PRESENT: " l SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN 13Y BOARD: _ MOTION: �, Jf� SECONDED ICY VOTE: FDIC: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: , /1SUiMAIY : 11A � _A .? �li . DESIGN REVJKW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 1Q1 MEMBERS Pal-;,SENT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: . ; s MOTION: A SECONDED By VOTE: FOR: AGAINST Ask r. . 1 '4 APPROVED; f DISAPPROVED SUMMARY:, //f N OF APPLICANT DESIGN REV1�;W BOARD DATE OIL 1G1EE,TING /ws� MEMBERS 11RESLlNT : ,(w SUBJECT: / / /)i Y t I%I�AIAj) iI r--, ACTION TAKEN 13Y BO RD : MOTION: 0 SECONDED BY �e VOTE: FOR: : APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CH AGAINST 70�G1 PCB BOA � �P ICAi ` L' 1 ;ter i DESIGN REV I I.,W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBEIIS PRESENT : :" .. SUBJECT • ACTIUN TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION : / SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST v APPROVED: D ISAPPROVIW : SUMMARY:---- r,., :k. DATE OF All, PETING MEMBERS PHESENT: DESIGN HEV'h W BOARD SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN MOTION., SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR., AGAINST APPROVED:- DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: T� I I - . DESIGN REV) F'W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT SUBJECT; ACTION TAKEN 13Y MOTION: SLCONDED BY VOTE. FOR: AGAINST APPLICANT APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: APPLICANT T . � DESIGN 111,V I i -; W BOARD DATE OF bII L;T I NG Z kZV /x - ylj 9A, E MEMBERS SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: DESIGN RLV .1 I ',W BOARD DATE OF MEETING � ]MEMBERS PHE'SEND[' : lei d SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: v MOTION: - SECONDED BY. VOTE; Foil AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: AYJPLICAN'1' DESIGN REV 7 R W BOARD DATE OF MEET ING , ��- 0 MEMBERS PRESENT SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY MOTION: 14 VOTE: a r SECONDED BY FOR: AGAINST M Mew N�� APPROVED: D ISAPPRCIVED : SUMMARY: �3OARJAY // t APPLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda November 26, 1975 Red Cock Rooster Farm Variance Application for a Display Box -- Bill Monsour 2. Vail Clinic sign application 3. The Place trash enclosuref • C] DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE OF MEETING% MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: SECONDED BY AGAINST AP CANT DESIGN REV] I�;W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY B A D: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: DESIGN REV1FW BOARD DATE OF MEETING I J MEMBERS PRESENT SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: SECONDED 13Y MOTION: VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHA RMA OFT AR APPLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda November 20, 1975 1, Jack Carnie Duplex conceptual approval. 2. Vail Clinic Sign application ` 3. The Cellar sign application Y �" 4. Jose Mulldoon s� 1 sign light 5. Hallmark Haus app sign application Cv r 0 DESIGN REV } 1 ;'W BOARD DATE OF MEETING - -i MEMBERS PRESENT: ► /" ► ► ► SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN 1 M V APPROVED: DISAPPROtED, P CHAIRMAN OF THE -BOARD APLICANT 1 DESIGN REV] 114 BOARD DASD OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT; �r SUBJECT: s� ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: � MOTION;. �SECONDED BY /L!eP apir- VOTE: FOR:-, AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: I CIL4fMTTN OF THE -4 AYPLICA14T DESIGN REVTJ�:W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY 06439hp:)-tt- VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: 77� P1 L 4 .:', G. • kn�i DESIGN REV FX BOARD .`;. DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: 0 SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION:' SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REV] l'W BOARD • ' '` DATE OF MEETING __ �76- • MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: fi MOTION: �*"'� SECONDED BY, • VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: in «a. APPLICANT r DESIGN REV1FW BOARD DATE OF MEETING 15 MEMBERS ' ;Zuv=lc=�� i SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOT ION : = SECONDED BY� VOTE: FOR: AGAINST .00- APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: : r r.f � DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda December 4, 1975 1. Calhoon's Saloon sign application dl's. -. Jon Eden 2, Camera Shop 4v sign application 3. Vail Chapel', conceptual d�Sign -W Bill Hanlon 4 Western Sportsw, sign applicatiow 5. Ted Stockmar,0a1,bp0? /4a —/,P conceptual design on avalanche defense - Ted Stockmar 6. Vail Clinic44zv w sign application • 7, Vail, Sports YWP-C sign application for Hill Building (2 signs) -- Garrett Smith 8. Gondola Sports W/,F/�0�r " ' / P-,3/ sign application Lionshead shop -- Garrett Smith • DliSIGN RI'V .; ll,W BOARD . DATE OF MEETING /z a, MEMBERS PRESENT: j SUBJECT: ACTION TAItEN I3Y ARD : " MOTION; T SECONDED BY ZV VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: y� DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: �h DESIGN REV I 1,X BOARD DATE OF MEETINGil,,.,,l"/.,., 9� MEMBERS PRESENT:� SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: Vol : AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN I EV 1 KW BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY MOTION: VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: �%� u R - SECONDED BY AGAINST DATE Or AtHTING' MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REV ] l;W BOARD ACTION TAKEN I3Y OARD : MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: I'OR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REV1RW BOARD DATE OF ME -STING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: VOTE: POR : APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SECONDED BY AGAINST /nf DESIGN REV 1 1-:W BOARD DATE Or MEETING S MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: 1 ACTION TAKEN 13Y I3 A D : U o® MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST (Q1'�G�%�lM4" APPROVED:_ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: DESIGN REV) F'W BOARD DATD OF MEETING 9PS MEMBERS PRESENT SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY RD; MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: m 4 DESIGN Rt.,,V 1 1.�W BOARD DATE OF MEETING G MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: B U! 7 t--- ACTION TAKEN ' A D: J4 / MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED:_ D I SAPPROV FT) SUMMARY: yv [ ( v MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Design Review Board DATE: December 5, 1975 RE: Recommendations for the 2 up- coming vacancies on the Design Review Board. After careful review we have come up with two people who we feel would be the best possible selection for the vacancies on the Design Review Board, The first is Barbara Parker. She has been a resident of this community long before it became a Town, and • we feel that this long experience with the growth of Vail gives her a good "feeling" for the community needs. She also, in our opinion, has a good sense of design, which would be a great asset for our community. From past experience she has demonstrated that she is a conscientious and concerned citizen who would attend the meetings regularly -- this we feel is an important factor in any applicant. Our second recommendation would be for the appointment of Ron Todd. His professional qualifications and the various designs that he has put forth show his grasp of the changing community needs and desires as far as design is concerned. We also feel that since he has a business in Town that he would be available to attend all meetings. 0 In summary, we find that both the recommended applicants are cooperative and.open minded which considering the nature''and TOWN COUNCIL - Design Review Board Recommendations December 5, 1975 Page Two the number of applications that we have to review each week, is an absolute necessity. If we can be of further assistance to you, please don't hesitate to contact us. do addition we also request that we be notified when you are considering the applications for the vacancies. Thank you. U 0 i • -0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda December 18, 1975. 1. Across the Mall sign app lication'�''` Jeff Nichols 2. The Craft Barnr,Ge sign application 3. Timberline Ski and Mountaineering sign application n, )y�b�,t c/ 4. Eagle Music ;, 0/,�,A, sign applicat&i41n 5. The Lodge at Vail (.h sign application f the Salt Lick Bar f 6. Eagle Dancer��,�J(: sign applicatioA 7. Red Cock Rooster Farm / display box / 0 cI I C4•`t��Ti 8. Ske ika' s ' 1fY?,J.1 j1��„ AL-'0 n" display b on the east wal of Gramshammer Building 9. Muskie, Bennet & Fox ` sign application 10. Hillis of Vail���U; sign applicatiA711/ 11. A Place on Earth sign applicationXZ•?' 12, Bill Bullocks l sign application DATE OF MEETING / MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: DESIGN REW l;',W BOARD ACTION TAKEN BY ARD: MOTION: 1j,4 SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: _ DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF, F THE'BOARD DESIGN REV] I?W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: �- SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY 0 RD: A MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: AGAINST CHAIRMAN OT' TIiIi; ' BOARD APP L I CANT DESIGN REV7.I?W BOARD DATE OF MEETING ,1l. to MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT-4- ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD: MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR., AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THF,BOARD APPLI�Al ` C. DESIGN REV.l.FW BOARD DATE OF MEETING �l t w MEMBERS PRESENT: X& &.,ZZ - SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN TAKEN BY /B)DARD: MOTION: VOTE: FOR: SECONDED BY P AGAINST APPROVED:- riTC h 7l Tl"flti Tt'n . CHAIRMAN OF THE-BOARD APPL I CAN'i' DESIGN R]"V) 1;W BOARD DATE OF MEETING dZI,� MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT d�� X4, < - . ACTION TAKEN BY B ARD: MOTION : SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR AGAINST %I I%- 191 APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: : CHAIRMAN OF THE k30ARD API ICAliV'1' DESIGN REV J .1 ;:W BOARD DATE OF MEETING . r MEMBERS PRESENT: G� SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY 166ARD: u MOTION: SECONDED BY - VOTE: FOR: C0?--�_ AGAINST APPROVED: nTQADDPC)I /' .D n CHAIRMAN OF THE'BOARD A PLICANZ c� IeI 4 . , llESIGN ItE'V ] 1�W BOARD DATE OTC' B1 'ET T NG I, MEMBERS PRESENT j SUBJECT i ACTION TAKEN BY 130ARD : MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: FOR: AGAINST r j1 l � i r' .r• rin APPROVED; DTSAPPHOVED: i e• 5 1. .1 1' CIiAT1�MAN OF ' 111,,, 13U�13ll ;.tilt• �' vi ?15 � 1 I,ju1Y' 1r f APPI.,ICf all r DESIGN REV 7IX BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: +, MOTION: VOTE FOR - r �•w J., k' `f APPROVED: D I SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: .;F CRAIRMAN OF THE BOARD .n. 47.: SECONDED BY AGAINST A PLZCAIVT 41, 1' YI 1 i` ` v 1' .k, 4;t 1 •, .IJ k' «f k. 1 .e. kll,kk1 �•LNII . „7 , DESIGN REA1.1 1;W BOARD DATE OF MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: -Z 1 , , 1 SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: MOTION: A11)4 SECONDED I3Y , VOTE: FOR: AGAINST , APPROVED: DISAPPROVED; SUMMARY: C iAIRMAN OF TH.[;' 130WRD APPLICANT DESIGN REI/ 1 1. IW BOARD ` DATE OF 6IEETING MEMBERS PRESENT : OTT • '1 �,J �rJ T r, SUBJECT ACTION TAKEN I3YI BOARD- MOTION: r, tip`!• VOTE; r, OR: i., t y. S 1 .. APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: r 1 1: s• i4 i'r11 .. 1•, CIIA I RMAN OF TH-E ' DOARD hlfl!� `Y ' iNiil 11 .f Tj Y Lit SECONDED BY AGAINST J L I CA N'I' 12!"L DESIGN IILV I l';W BOARD DATE OF - L-1 MEMBERS PRESENT: ,SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY,) q04RD'. '( 1,")e, �/ SECONDED 13Y,�' MOTION: /' - -&4& Wjz VOTE: FOR; AGAINST j APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: SUMMARY: CHAIRMAN OF THE' L30AIlD PLICANT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda December 24, 1975 1. Colorado Ski Museum e615> exterior material c n 2. Garton's Bridge Street Saloon trash enclosure -- Rob Garton 3. Crossroads West sign program Z���Q C/ 4. Skei ka' s display box -- Pepi Grams ammer 5. The Place /���� �d. trash encl sure "4 U -0 1JL'.5'.Ltll lt!';4' J r,1V LiUElltll DATE Or t1 EE.TING s MEMBERS PRESENT: I . i 1 'f ACTION TAKEN }3Y OAR MOTION: SECONDED BY VOTE: Foil: AGAINST :I r 4' al, 1 APPROVED: �- D I SAPPROVED : SUMMARY: •�IIIYi >: - I�• 1 + ri ;7 CHA Rh AN OF r ti� • .' 1 4 � •± •1 1'. r 4' 1 ,1• q I' •t r F DATE OF 61HETING MEMBERS PRESENT: SUBJECT: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD' MOTION: SECONDED 13Y ' VOTE: FOR: AGAINST APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: ejf 1��.11••1� ?, , 1� 1 r' '1 1jjJjA —JAI I4 LIY .i I - II UV I I I LL DATE OF ,1li I?,T I NG �.-.-4 ?7 MEMBERS PRESENT: . . SUBJECT:, I ACTION TAKEN }3Y UARD MOT 1014 SECONDED I3Y VOTE. VOR. AGAINST - -- i" r• !r dYl��•ti Y ' LI. .w.. a1�1 ti�i l ,.h l 1' APPROVED D I SAPPROVED : li llL'�ltalV !{.�;4` J +'.IV LiU��ltll DATE OF I+IBET I NG _ ` MEMBERS PRESENT: tA/ tic► �.- ,a. 'I SUI3J'ECT ACTION TAKEN BY HOARD: ? MOTION: {. r VOTE; Foil: K c:h y. .y• I r•Ir , t ' .'r I APPROVED: r-N r 0 nit Tl D n111:n . r SECONDED BY AGAINST sell .' I I „f•�ri' 1 R�l4 r.•ir � 1•.I,t