Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 DRB Agendas & MInutesDESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA January 4, 1984, 2:OOPM 1. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: Site Visit 1. Mill Creek Gallery sign and valance. (Tabled from 12/7/83) 7-0 Sign and valance approved as submitted, re,commendat.i,'on for Variance �s approval Site Visit 2. The Valley - Phase VI (The Enclave) #1 Application for extension of DRB approval. 0 Tabled until January 18, 1984 Site Visit 3. The Ore House Sign, The Gallery Building #5 7-0 Approved as submitted Site Visit 4. The Shaft Restaurant, at the Enzian, sign variance request. #3 Tabled by applicant 0 Site Visit #4 5. Boots "n" Boards, Sonnenalp, sign variance. Tabled Site Visit 6. Santiago residence remodel, Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Village 1st Filing. #6 7-0 Approved as submitted 7. Beaver Creek Real Estate sign, Casino Building 1 display box approved as submitted for six months period Bunn abstaining Site Visit 8. First National Bank of Vail, Vail das Shone, exterior alteration. #2 6-0 Approved as submitted Baldwin Abstaining IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT 011 members present IP U STAFF APPROVALS Stephens Communi.ca.ti'on One Vail Place - December 22, 1983 Casino Building - VA/Beaver Creek Real Estate _ December 23, 1983 Bridge Street Shuffle �� - December 31. 1983 Gallery Bui'ldi'ng Project Application Date Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone YN- Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board D ate Iv hy Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL I Summary: X DISAPPROVAL Date: - - � � �lha.RriMBry/vail: DISAPPROVAL Date: - - � � �lha.RriMBry/vail: r 75 south frontage road Vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Lisa Rodgers Vail Associates Box 7 Vail, Colorado, 81658 Office of community development RE:. Display Box ., Casino Building Dear Lisa, On January 4, 1984, the Design Review Board gave a six months approval for Beaver Creek Real Estate to use a display box located along Gore Creek Drive in the Casino Building. Directional information toward your entrance must be included in the directory. This directional information and any reference to Vail Associates/Beaver Creek Real Estate must be limited to .5 square feet. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Tom Braun TAB/rme :7 ..,,74 r.� Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor. Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Project Application Date Block Filing , Zone Design Review Board Date �f Motion by: Seconded by, PROVAL j� DISAPPROVAL Summary: the printeryvAil . Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Project Application Date . (V kt Filing , Zone Design Review Board { Date Motion by: `A Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: DISAPPROVAL Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: -� the Printery/v8d - _ town of VON)/ 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 478-7000 Paul Johnston %Christiana Lodge 100 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado, 81657 office of community development January 6, 1984 RE: Mill Creek gallery Sign Variance, awning Dear Paul, On January 4, 1984, the Design Review Board gave approval to your awning and recommended approval of your variance request for a display box. The variance request will be on the Town Council Agenda for January 17, 1984. Sincerely, Thomas Braun TAB/rme LJ Project Application Date 1' iProject Name: ti..i • 1..1 — --' — Project Description: tQn, VN Contact Person and Phone 0` " ''' �' w Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Zone Design Review Board Date Motion by:�"''"'� Seconded by:��� APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL v I�rh.N�ti rvt-.o�c Summary: 1. cx� � Ali �-t`l�a 57Ci� Gri► �Fl f X2r—_-- Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval the.Prinlery/vad I* Project Name: Project Description: Contact. Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application Date � 3. i l Legal Description: Lot Block / FilingZone - Comments: Design Review Board Date _— Motion by:��9,� Seconded by:� APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL — Summary: r _ 1 _ . _ A- -% _ _ _ N P K "V'" '1 crr Acs-l"y-C_. r7fc e Date: ❑ Staff Approval the Pdnkerylvait 10WO of Vag 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (3031476-7000 Erasmo Santiago RE: Santiago Remodel Dear Brad, office of community development January 9, 1984 On January 4, 1984, the Design Review Boad approved the remodel of the Santiago home with the following conditions: 1. 3x6 nominal miniumum for railings, balcony 2. Enlarge facia (2x12 minimum). 3. Construct tree vault for large spruce. 4. Construct fence during building phase to protect undisturbed areas. 5. Any disturbed areas must be restored. If you should have any questions concening this approval, do not hesitate .to call me at 476-7000, extention 103. Sincerely, Thomas Braun TAB/rme • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 18, 1984 2:00 pm I: Call meeting to order II. Roll call, determiniation of quorum III. Agenda: Site Visit 1. The Shaft Restaurant, Enzian Lodge, sign variance request Tabled, by applicant #1 2. Vail Professional Building, construction sign application App. 7-0 Approved as suBmi,tte.d. 3. Buzz' Boots and Boards, Sonnenalp, sign variance request Applicant did not show #2 4. Vail Drug Store, Vail das Schone, sign variance request Applicant did not show 5. Beaver Creek Real Estate Sign, 3 square foot sign recalled by Town Manager App. 7-0 New sign (wood, sand. blasted) has bee.rl approyed,, location to be determined IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Ca.sweI1. Nunn Donovan R.osolack Tafoya Baldwin Matthews lows 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 STAFF APPROVALS office of community development 1. Revision to landscape plan for Hobbitt Hill 2. Addition of three skylights to Unit D at the Ridge at Vail, 3. Air conditioning unit located on ground level of the Holiday Inn, 4. Re -build of a structure atop the Oh.art House. Re'stwant, • Project Application � U JhA��� 75 south frontage road vail, coiorado 81657 (303)476-7000 Lisa Rodgers Beaver Creek Real Estate P. 0. Box 7 Vail, Colorado, 81657 . Dear Lisa, 0 office of community development Oanu.ary 19, 1984 Re: Beaver Creek Real Estate Sign Casino Building At their January 18th meeting, the Design Review Board gave approval to the most recent sign application for Beaver Creek Real Estate. Approval is for a three square foot wood, sand blasted sign. The location of the sign will be determined by myself and your office after a desicion concerning the awning (over the main entrance) has been made. Please contact me.when you are ready to address the location of this sign. Sincerely, Thomas A. Braun TAB/rme DESTGN REVIEW'BOARD AGENDA FEBRUARY 1, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order IY. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: Site Visit #4 1. The Shaft Restaurant Sign variance request Tabled by applicant ;ite Visit #1 2. Altair Vail Application to re -roof building 4-0 Approved per application Prestigue "Weathered Wood" shingle on steep sections of roof only. iite Visit #3 3. Lionshead Ticket Office and Sign Application Ipp.3-0-1 Approved as submitted, change in color of awning from red to red/pink stripes Lunn abstain- ing iite Visit #2 4. Golden Peak Conceptual Review No vote taken IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT: Baldwin Munn MEMBERS ABSENT: Matthews Donovan Summary: n Project Application Date Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: 4,11 Design Review Board Date - 7— Motion by: Seconded by: Q . OVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: n 1 16WHI"DIV31 75 south lronlage road vail, colorado 85657 (303) 476-7000 office of community development Conrad Kawulok B & M Roofing 3131 N. 75th Street Boulder, Colorado 80301 RE: Altair Vail February 2, 1984 Dear Conrad, On February 1, 1984, the Design Review Board approved your re -roofing application for Altair Vail. Approval is for Prestigue #1 ELK/30 "Weathered Wood". Any questions concerning this approval can be directed to me at 476-7000 - extension 103. Sincerely, Thomas Braun TAB/rme �j DESIGN REVIEW BOARD February 15, 1.984 2:00 pm I. Call meeting to order II. Roll call, determination of quorum III. Agenda items: Site Visit: 1. The Valley, Phase VI (The Enclave), extension of DRB approval Received one year extension of approval for 11 units and recreation facilities with the condition that the trees by 2" rather than 1.5 inch as proposed in plan. Vote: 5-0 approval 2. Vail Apothecary, Vail das Schone, sign variance request Approval 4-1 with conditions, to be on Council agenda March 6. 1 3. Ski 'n Shore Realty, sign application Approval with conditions that lighting be minimum as necessary to display, lights not be on after the lobby/entry way lights turned off, copy limited to 5 photos and .5 sq ft to identify business. Vote 5-0 4 4. Miller residence, Lot 26, Vail Village West #2 Disapproved 5-0, citing Section 18.54.050A.1. "Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings and with Vail's environment." 2 5. Treetops Condominiums, commercial addition Approved 4-1 preliminary approval with concerns to be addressed at next meeting which include: color of roof, landscaping berm, accent elements, detailing on the site, i.e. curbs, exterior lighting, possible benches IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT Caswell Mattews Baldwin Bunn Donovan MEMBERS ABSENT Project Application pp Date roject Name: L '' Project Description: 3 '7& Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: A Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Date r Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Zone�� Town Planner Date: —� ❑ Staff Approval c /G the printery/vOil ■ Project Application W2 Project Name: Project Description: Owner Address and Phone. • Date 11 fid-��' � .� ",er' � .spt pV:- fi' ' ' r 1-t1001-4- Architect Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing .� _ `-tel{� Zone: Zoning Approved: Design Review Board �\ Rate Motion by: Seconded by: OVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: jr Zoning Administrator Date: Date: Chief Building Official the printerylvail .. ` Project Name: Project Description; 0 Project Application �Rroject Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: 'a Legal Description: Lot 2 Block Filing Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: 4/ APPROVAL Summary: Town Planner Date: ,Zone Design Review Board Date 2 DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval ' the prinlerYlvail: IW "RW Project Application Date a� 66oject Name: Project Description: VI H^KCFM5 412 ( 1)s Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: rl Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Filing *- 12— V I A , Zone �-- Design Review Board Date t. Motion by: LLrs Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: rc Town Planner Date: C) ❑ Staff Approval the p[intery!vaii� - -- towo a Tf 75 south frontage road Trail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA MARCH 7, 1984 2:OOPM 1. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: Site Visits 3. 1. Shaft: Sign Variance Request , Tabled by applicant. 5. 2. Treetops: Commercial Addition: - Preliminary Approval Contingent upon submission of: 1. Updated landscape plan. 2. Updated plant/material list. office of community development (4 approved - 1 denial) 3. Color sample for roof, showing percentage of reflection, 4. Update on irrigation plans. 5. Handicap access will be addressed. 2. 3. Cascade Tennis Courts. (5 approved no denial) Final approval - contingent upon: 1. A letter from a certified horticulturalist stating what must be done to save trees. 2. Snow fence will be constructed to protect adjacent site from construction. 6. 4. Alfie Packer Awning: (5 approval - no denial) Final approval for color change of awning. 7. 5. Charthouse Ventilation Enclosure - Tabled by applicant. 0 Site Visit 4 6. Sunbird foot Tub Conceptual Approval (5 approved no denial) Before final approval applicant shall complete the following: 1. Stamped engineer's letter, re: deck can support tub. 2. Information on any additional lighting. 3. Explore possibility of relocating flue. 4. Improve condition of existing rail. page two 1. 7. Vail Racquet Club Addition . Approved as submitted. (4 approved - 1 denial) Final approval contingent upon submission of title report and/or easement report. IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS ABSENT: IFA MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Braun Kristan Pritz Diana Donovan Steve Caswell Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Jack Hunn Project Application Date Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: % Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing 0' Design Review Board Date .A-7 Motion Seconded by: APPROVAL summary: Town Planner Date: DISAPPROVAL w ❑ Staff Approval Zone. e3 IIB pelntarylvai$ .Project Application Date Project Name: Project Description: � fiT d� Lir' Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: 74 �- 74 M7-0 Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block 11g. t" Zori °'lfl� 7411 � .. cap' Comments: f �j Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: i Date DISAPPROVAL the pdnlerylveiL - Project Application Date�7 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing ,Zone ...�— r N Comments: Design Review Board Date b&- Motion by: Seconded by: APPROV�AL� Summary: Town Planner Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval . lBa pHnlery/vagi IN 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Department of Community Development DATE: February 29, 1984 office of community development SUBJECT: Sign Variance request for the Shaft Restaurant located in the Enzian APPLICANT: Ed Nichols Description of Variance • The applicant is requesting a variance from section 1.6.20.190 of the sign code, "Wall Signs - Individual Business within a multi -tenant building". The variance request is for both the location and size of the proposed sign. The sign code allows the Shaft a maximum of three (3) square feet of signage (because of the restaurants insufficient frontage). The location of the sign is limited to the exterior wall of the building subject to review of the Design Review Board. This application is for a sign ten (18) square feet in size to be located on a retaining wall along the walkway leading to the Enzian Lodge (see photos). Consequently, this variance involves two requests. 1. Size. Ten (10)square feet rather than the three (3) square feet allowed. 2. Location. Mounted at a location other than that outlined by the sign code. Criteria for Approval. Before the board acts on a variance application, the applicant must prove physical hardship, and the board must find that: A. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the lands, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right-of-way, which would is substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question; 0 page two .provided, however, that such special circumstances or conditions are unique to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention, and do not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises; B. That such special circumstances were not created by the applicant or anyone in privy to the applicant; C. That the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purposes of this title, and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or working in the vicinity, adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in general; D. The variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of this title any more than is required to identify the applicant's business or use. E. Such other factors and criteria as the design review board deems applicable to the proposed variance. Staff Recommendation Staff recommendation for this request addresses the two elements of the proposal. Location. There is no doubt that the Shaft is located "off the beaten path" - A sign located on the exterior wall of the building (.as required by the code); would be ineffective as a means for attracting attention to the restaurant. The staff supports the proposed.location for this sign and feel it satisfies the criteria for approval. (A-E from the above). Size. The staff cannot support the ten (.10) square feet of signage as proposed. Specifically this proposal does not satisfy criteria D from above. To allow ten (10) square feet for this sign would go beyond the provisions of this title more than is necessary to identify this business. A three (3) square foot sign located as proposed, along with the Shaft's one (1) square foot sign on the Enzian Lodge freestanding sign, adequately identifies this business. • NO, of Mi 75 south frontage road vall, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESM REVIEW BOARD AGENDA MARCH 28, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call -- Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: 4-1 1. Treetops Commercial Expansion (Donovan Against) Final approved per application q* office of community development 4-1 2. Sunbird Lodge Hot Tub Approved per application existing flue well be enclosed to match existing railing 4-1 3. Miller Residence (Resubmittal) (Baldwin) Denied - cited section 18-54-050 A. 1., also cited an inadequate landscape plan Site Visit 4. Wyche Remodel #2 5-0 Approved per application with exception that two existing conifers not be re -located. 0 Site Visit #1 5-0 #5 5-0 #3 6 #4 5--0 page two 5. Austin Residence Approved per application pending public works approval. 6. Simons Garage/Hot Tub Addition Approved per application 7. Santiago Residence Approved per application pending public works approval 8. Ambulance Garage Landscape Pian Approved per application TV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT all present page three MEMBERS ABSENT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF APPROVALS 1. Carolselli New Sign - Lionshead 2. First National Bank of Vail Sign Approved per Vail Das Shone Sign Program [J Project Application Dater . 1V MEN Vim. Project !Name: Rf2ENT,.. Project Description: ALLE i' +1*.- t� �� -- Contact Person and Phone l�,j ` --- r u��Owner, Address and Phone: P20EI LE NE, DN�K- (f), Ii! C�`' Architect, Address and Phone: PEIM-o-ELIE b-mu - —: Filing. Zone Legal Description: Lot Block. Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL is Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Project Application Filing Zone Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by:y� ,— RF�VA L 111 i.�Y�1r- �wRf� DISAPPROVAL Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: 2� - the prl»leryNall Motion by: Seconded by: 64 APPROVAL -Summary: Town Planner Date: -- ❑ Staff Approval the printeq/Vail Project Application Date Project Name: �6v�L Project Description:., kA -- Contact Person and Phone �� '- ` n J4 Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Motion by:� Seconded by: PROVA Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone Summary: Town Planner At - ( Date: 0 Staff Approval < iha Orinlarywail. _- —� Project Application Date Project Name: ' - ° Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board' ate Motion by: Seconded by: PPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Zama i(i� Summary: P_ 16-4 `'� d AL &--I 4AX-41"Le- I 41164 -,le- dIA— Project Application / Date Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone _ :fRi2. Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by. Seconded by; APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: Ji it lows of voi 75 south frontage road pail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Peter Loomis P. 0. Box 3443 Vail, Colorado, 81657 office of community development April 2, 1984 RE: Treetops Commercial Plaza Dear Peter: Enclosed is a copy of your final approval for the Treetops Commercial Plaza. • Congradulations on the job you did in addressing the concerns of the Design Review Board. I -f you have any questions concerning your approval, do not hesitate to call. �Siinncerely, Tom Braun TAB/rme 11 0 Project Application 0Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone J Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: PROVAL Summary: Town Planner Date: Date -ZA- Filing �° fe - Design Review. Board Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval the printerylvad Project Application Date i Al Project Name: i_;t�i { � Project Description: " Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone:) Architect, Address and Phone: LAVf—" X �4Y47. C1 F Legal Description: Lot « Block Filings __ , Zone Comments: Project Application Date 'I, Al Project Name: 1 ( L(,ii /t, (�,r1(a I D V�� ' Project Description: Contact Person and Phone N i �L 1, � M I L.l . �641 Lit Ott(�', i-+Sobe D C! k 1, JG_ Owner, Address and Phone: _ Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: `y60 , Block Filing \)J'J t*12_� Design Review Board Motion by: �� - Seconded by: UV\'Vk- APPROVAL Summary: A Town Planner Date: Date ,f!,APPROVAL , Zone V/9 ❑ Staff Approval _ - _ - the.prinleryha+l M) Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Project Application LA Date b; r`1 � AILc.r. Filing Design Review Board Date Motion by: i Seconded by: �-- OV DISAPPROVAL �` , Zone (`flow/ri Planner Dale ❑ Staff Approval . th® printeryJyat4 :7 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN. REVIEW BOARD AGENDA APRIL 4, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items office of community development 1. Public Discussion and confirmation of votes on agenda items for the Design Review Board meeting - March. 28, 1984 at 2:00 PM. 5-0 approved IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Caswell Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Jack Hunn Will Trout MEMBERS ABSENT: lows 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA April 18, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum office of community development III. Agenda Items Site Visit #1 1. Exterior Modification to Vail Valley 3rd Filing, Lot 10 •4-0 Approval contingent upon: 1. Preserve trees in front planting area -maintain original grade & allow for standing Water drainage. 2. Match exposed glulam beam to existing gray siding 3. Solve snow shedding problem off of covered entry 4. Screen and landscape utility boxes 5. Remove existing flashing 6. Entry gate may be light gray or black #2 2. Osborne Addi'ti'on - Vail Village lst, Block 1, Lot 13 Approved 4-0 Driveway must be paved. • #3 3. Cascade Village - Conceptual Review of the Terrace Wing 9 No vote 0 page two TV. New Business V. Old Business STAFF APPROVALS: 1. Deck Modification to Riverhouse Condominiums 2. Remodel to Slifer Residence MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Jack Hunn Will Trout Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Project Application Date SProject Name: .1111 Project Description: C.�1 Contact Person and Phone 2? AIWBE& Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot I Block Filing Comments: Design Review Board lls- Date Motion by:�""�` Seconded by: OVAL DISAPPROVALin Summary: Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Zone the printsrywaft Project Application Date �I Project Name. ^�40 Project Description: Contact Person and Phone 1 Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: r aIT I Filing Zone ilia, Legal Description: Lot Block g Comments: Design Review Board ` l Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 11 11 i �:� 1'�i► L��� ' 1 v 1 �, i it►. 1 � �i�1,: 1i. ►� (ti k 1 �1� 1. �1L Town PEanner Date: ❑ Staff Approval tha pdnlary/VH,i� • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA May 2, 1984 2:00 pm I. Call meeting to order H. Roll call -- determination of quorum III. Agenda Items Site Visit 5 1. Golden Peak Base Facility preliminary review 5-0 -- approved for preliminary approval 7 2. Gold and Silversmiths of Vail, sign and awning Tabled to May 16, 1984 10 3. Sunbird Lodge, sign application Tabled to May 16, 1984 2 4. Summers Residence Approved 4-1 Conceptual approval Snow fence will be constructed to define/protect areas not to be disturbed. Re-evaluate orientation of house. Revegetate sewer easement. 1 5. Walker -Ray residence, garage addition Applicant will resubmit plans (at May 16, 1984, meeting), addressing concerns of the Board. Develop strong connection to house. Suggested turn around spot. Suggested designing a higher garage door. 6 b. Craddock remodel 5-0 preliminary approval Finish design work on chimneys. Re-evaluate landscape plan. Provide material & color sample. r� LJK15 0/4/64 4 7. Halpert residence garage addition 4-1 preliminary approval Protect aspen tress on the southeast corners of the house. Provide catch basin for oil for parked cars in garage. 11 8. Cleveland residence 5-0 approval for secondary unit on lot 15,000 square feet 5-0 preliminary approval for Design 3 9. Tract A, Vail Village 13th, placement of clean fill 3-1-1 - Hunn abstaining Matthews against motion for denial, plan is inconsistent with 18-54-050 D, I of Design Guideline 8 10. Exterior modification to Lodge Promonade, Mountain Tees Contingent upon staff approval of sign 5-0 approved as submitted 9 11. Kiandra Lodge, color change Nunn Caswell 5-0 approved with condition that fascia and snow grate (on roof) also be painted Staff Approvals 1. Taylor residence, lot 27, block 1, Potato Patch deck addition 2. Holiday House hot tub, changes to previous DRB approval IV. New Business starting time for May 16th meeting will be early to accommodate large agenda V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT: Munn Matthews Caswell Trout Baldwin MEMBERS ABSENT Project Name: a Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application 1\ 15tsl+ 3 0"V % Date N IF Legal Description: Lot Block Filing ,Zone Comments: Design Review Board Motion by:� t� Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 1 Summary: No�wn I Planner Date: il�a�ltn�t�� ❑ Staff Approval - - the Printery/vail I Project Application Date March 30 1984 Project Name: Project Description: t of Golden Peak facilities. Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Post Office Box 7, Vail, CO, 81658 303/4.76-5601 Architect, Address and Phone: 2ni (;are Creek Drive, Vail , ('Q, 57 303/476-2201 Amended S i Base Legal Description: LotTr@-gt F —, Block Filing 5th ,Zone :Rec. Dist. Comments: for preliminary review by the Design Review Board. Revised site plan, sign plan and program summary in preparation. • Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: I own rlanner Date: Date 2 -- DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval the printery/Vali Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Project Application Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing. Zon E Comments: Design Review Board _ Not - I ■ Date Motion.by: —, Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL t I ■ Project Application MProject Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Town Plan Date Block Filing Date Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval , Zone - the prinlerylvaii Project Application Pro•ect Name: Date A 1 6 Project Description:Abb Doo 0. F 3(Y bac*s � — A - W t 00 b,b Contact Person and Phone ��S�VU6 4$ —gS'3I 6e&e�GW k/ 43-1333 bou Pyx- 45-3-47S 3i. - 4Y3- u cI Owner, Address and Phone: CxL 0 yr p.(). (33K (o F (, IZ€C,-6vA) WtCJ6ej CCS Architect, Address and Phone: Block v C' Filing _ Nt-F Comments: v.r.v� r1 . - 1 .—_._ „� - — - f2-0 . • Design Review Board Motion by: _ %C �^% & --- Seconded by: fa� Summary: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval the pdnlerylvail Project Application Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Date Architect, Address and Phone: o �j t Legal Description: Lo L� Block Filing �V) j Zone Comments: Design Review Board s WO Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL WILLI Summary: 1 T wn Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval the pdnterglvail Project Name: Project Descrir Contact Persor _ T Project Application Owner, Address and Phone: 13—f, A- Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application Dat Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone r rr -S" &Az' c' -S. Owner, Address and Phone:. �l( Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVA Summary: own Plan er Date: ❑ Staff Approval , Zone C the prinleryYvail IN 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA May 16, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order 11. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: 1. Walker -Ray Garage Tabled by applicant to May 30, 1984 meeting. 2. Halpert Garage Approved per application. Appr. 3. Craddock Remodel 5-0 Approved per application Appr. 4. Summers Residence 5-0 Approved pending: Public Works approval Recording of sub plat Site Visit 5. Gold & Silversmith of Vail - Sign and.Awning #7 nr. 4-0-1 Approved with conditions. office of community development Site Visit #2 6. Sunbird Lodge sign application Application withdrawri; #9 7. Berkowitz Addi'ti'on (conceptual) Request by applicant to table to May 30th. 1984 meeting 8. Plaza Lodge Exterior Modifications Approved per application 9. Lodge Promanade Exterior Modifications Approved per submittal, not to include signage 10. Frampton Residence Approved per submittal pending Public Works approval and fireplace change 11. Mill Creek Court Building - Exterior alteration and display box. Approved per submit with, condftion:` that 'Freestanding sign- be removed. 01 Ote Visit #11 12. Ogsbury Residence Appr. 5-0 Preliminary approval, landscape plan and color samples to be submitted at May 30th Design Review Board Meeting. Appr. #3 13. Charthouse ventilation enclosure 4-0-1 Approved per application Appr. #8 14. Village Center Addition and site improvements 4-0-1 Preliminary approval #1 15. Vail Professional Building new landscape plan 4-0 Approval pending investigation into overall circulation.,pian i•or Di'str4ct. STAFF APPROVALS 1. Cogswell -Snowdon Residence - exterior alterations 2. Mike Palmer Real Estate Sign 3. Los Amigos re -build of existing deck. MEMBERS PRESENT: Will Trout (meeting - not site visits) Steve Caswell Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Jack Hunn c- • 75 south frontage road vall, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 office of community development DESIGN REVIEW BOARD May 16, 1984 PREVWUS� RECOMMENDATIONS FROM- DESI-BN REVIEW BOARD - MAY 2, 1984 1. Summers Residence Lot l B, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision 1st. A.. Construct a snow fence to protect the'bog'area at the rear of the sIte.. B. Evaluate the: orientation of the house C. Revegetate the sewer easement once the easement is moved to the east edge of the lot. D. The project must be reviewed by the Town.Engineer to insure that design mitigates powder avalanche impacts as per the Mear's Report. E. Provide materials and color samples. 2. Walker -Ray Garage Addition - lot 28, #1 Vail Meadows A. Develop a stronger connection to the house, i. e. the garage should be moved closer to the house. B. Consider a possible location for a second garage. C. Consider designing a higher garage door to allow for snow removal equipment. 3. Craddock Remodel:. Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village lst. A. Finish the design of the'chimneys. B. Re-evaluate adequacy of the landscape plan. C. Provide materials and color samples. D. Provide utility verification form. • 4. Halpert Garage; lot 6, block 7,'Vail Village 8th. A. Address the location and Tmpact of -the garage on the aspen trees located on the southwest corner of the house. B. Design a catch basin for oi`1 from cars parked in the garage. • • fowl 75 south frontage road nail, colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM Kristan Pritz DATE: May 10, 1984. office of community development SUBJECT: Village Center Addition and site improvements. I have enclosed background information for you on the Village Center Project. On April 9, 1984, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the project in respect to: 1. A side setback variance for the loading berth on the east side of the building. 2. The exterior alterations to the building. The Planning and Environmental Commiss-on approved both requests unanimously. The staff memo includes a project description, review of the project":s compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, Commercial Core II Zoning Compliance, and staff recommendation concerning the variance. Minutes from the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting are enclosed. Baldwin Associates Architects, Incorporated have written a report that reviews their design concepts for the Village Center proposal. These comments are also enclosed in the packet of background information. r MEMORANDUM STO: planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 5, 1984 SUBJECT: Request for exterior alteration and a side setback variance for Village Center Building D. Applicant: Fred Hibberd I, BACKGROUND This proposal began to be discussed in June of 1983 when the applicant and his architect applied for a commercial addition on the east side of the property and a redevelopment of the Toymaker's Trail shop's stairs on the west end. We discussed redeveloping the entire sidewalk/landscaped area on the north and west sides of the building, as well. The planning staff encouraged the applicant to treat the proposal as a "master plan" concept which meant making it one entire comprehensive proposal, including the new sidewalk and landscaping on the west and north sides, the new stairs for Toymaker's Trail, retail store front expansions on the north elevation, new stairway entries/exits from the sidewalk to the street, the two-story commercial addition on the east and the creation of new loading areas on both the east and west ends of the building. The lack of adequate loading facilities on the east end of the property is the major issue which held the project up so long. The staff encouraged the applicant to explore a joint loading facility with the adjacent property to the east, Hotel Sonnenalp, as they were proposing a major redevelopment on their property. It was not until this past Tuesday, April 3rd, that the Sonnenalp's proposal was approved on second reading of the Special Development District Ordinance. Also, this somewhat complex proposal has received a great deal of review from the various departments of the Town, including Public Works/Transportation, Fire and Police. The proposal in front of the Planning and Environmental Commission today has accomplished the objectives and requirements of all the various departments. (See memos attached from Public Works and Fire Department.) The Village Center project remains, for reasons still unclear to the current planning staff, in the Commercial Core II zone district. However, the project is located in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan area and must be evaluated with regard to those documents. Thus, this memorandum will proceed in -five more sections: first, a description of the proposal; second, an evalua- tion of how the plan meets the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan; third, a look at compliance with Commercial Core II zone district requirements; fourth, a look at the requested setback variance; and lastly, a staff recommendation. A new walkway from of Village Center to architecturally as well as provide Village Cent -3- 4/5/84 the pedestrian walk will maintain access for Building A and will have a roof covering the north portion of the stairs tie together the Sonnenalp and Village Center projects some protection from the elements for the walkways' users. III. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN (even though in CCII) A. COMPLIANCE WITH PURPOSE SECTION FOR COMMERCIAL CORE I The Commercial Core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment, The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urban design guide plan and design considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distringuish the village. We find that the proposal is in compliance with and furthers the intent of the purpose section for Commercial Core I, B. SUB -AREA CONCEPTS AFFECTED (See attached Urban Design Guide Plan) There are a number of Sub -Area Concepts which are indirectly related to the Village Center project. Briefly, Sub -Area Concepts 19 and 20 relate to a number of physical design solutions to reduce the "lost tourist" who drives down Village Road and then west on East Meadow Drive looking for parking or whatever. The current proposal for Village Center recognizes this as a potential future project (Fred Hibberd gave a portion of land to the Town in 1981 toward this end) but is designed for workability without these improvements as the Town has no immediate plans for this capital improvement project. Numbers 21 and 22 relate to the last commercial addition project which was completed three years ago. Number 17 discusses improvements to the intersection of Willow Bridge Road and East Meadow Drive. A larger planter in the middle and brick paving treatment are called for. Sub -Area Concept 18 is what is being proposed for the sidewalk. It reads: "Existing walk lowered slightly to become major separated south side pedestrian route (barrier free ramps). Landscape planting buffer along roadway." Village Cente( -5- 4/5/84 9. Sun/Shade: The building is so massive that it will always cast s a ' e own to the sidewalk area. The new commercial addition will cast some shade onto the new walkway, and it will be the applicant's responsibility to maintain the walk in good condition. IV. COMMERCIAL CORE II ZONE DISTRICT COMPLIANCE A. Uses: The proposed commercial uses are permitted uses in the Commercial Core II district. B. Setbacks: Required is 10 feet on all sides. The proposal complies .with this except with regard to the variance for the joint loading facility discussed below. C.Coverage: 70% maximum Existing = 59% Proposed = 68% D. Landscaping: 20% minimum. The proposal provides a net increase in landscaped areas. E. Parkinq and Loading: The applicant will be required to pay into the parking fund the applicable amount for the commercial expansion. 46 V. SETBACK VARIANCE A. Request The applicant requests a 0 foot setback on the east boundary of the property to construct a joint loading dock with the Sonnenaip. The proposal is to have the loading building overlap the property line in this area. The loading facility was constructed at the request of the staff as a solution to loading problems existing in the area as well as a viable placement of the facility to enable service to both properties. B. Recommendation The Community Development Department recommends approval of the setback variance for the joint loading building as We -find a specificphysical bardshrp'in locating it elsewhere in this area. We feel that the proposed solution is an excellent one and will adequately serve both ,properties. All impacts of the building are positive ones (refer to service/delivery section of this memorandum). ip • 10WHI of voi 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 department of public works/transportation M E M O R A N D U M TO: Peter Patten, Comity Development FROM: Stan Berryman DATE: April 5, 1984 SUBJECT: VILLAGE CENTER EXPANSION PROPOSAL This memo is to notify you that the Department of Public Works/Transportation has reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the Village Center project as ammended. r-1 n W w W� vrl•L� C a o• � h i p� 2 M • 0 ,e� PRESENT Diana Donovan Scott Edwards Gordon Pierce Duane Piper Howard Rapson Will Trout Planning and Environmental Commission April 9, 1984 STAFF PRESENT Peter Patten Tom Braun Kristan Pritz Larry Eskwith Betsy Rosolack ABSENT JIM VIELE - Y 1C � ## r uilta -(�T f�NAO _ The meeting was called to order at 3:00 pm by Duane Piper, chairman. 1. Approval of minutes -of March 12 and March 26. Pierce moved and Donovan`-& conded to approve the rected minutes of March 12. The vote was 6-0 in favor. ut corrected t larch 26 minutes so that his reason for voting against the So pale s ial development district would read: "because he did not feel any project' ld be approved that would have any negative effect on TOV property (i.e. the b sheer paving, trees, or other improvements existing)." Donovan �-noved and son secondeQapprove the March 26 minutes. as corrected. The vote was 6- in favor. 2. Request for a front setback variance of 1.6 feet for an existing bu_ildin� or the Vail Racquet Club Townhomes located at 5770 Bighorn Road. Applicant: Vail Racquet Club Townhomes Tom Braun explained the request. He stated that Build' I had been constructed only 18.4 feet from t front property line, resulting 'n a 1.6 foot encorachment into the setback. Braun dded that the variance wou1 have no impact on existing or potential uses and struck res, but that there w no evidence to indicate a physical hardship, merely hug n error. Walter Kirch, the applicant, said fhat he fou d that the Town of Vail owned the adjoining property, and that he consili" ed king for either a land swap or a land acquisition, but decided to first k for a variance. He felt that the granting of this variance would not con s ' ute a grant of special privilege because of other similar variances in uding in 1981 for lot 12 in Bighorn 4th which was 18.2 feet from the proper line. Heded that granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the p lic health, safety,, r�welfare, and felt that he qualified because the strict,6r literal interpretation and enforcement would result in practical difficult and would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of of r properties in the same district. Trout moved and Pierce sQ�onded to approve th ariance request because the granting of the variance would oto/Og a grant of special privilege, and would not be detrimental to the pth, safety or welfare and was warranted because the strict or literal intn and enforcement of the specified regulation would,result in practi�X�or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the ob7ec47Vesincode. The vote was 6-0 in favor, n �J PEC -2- 4/9'4 3. P,eoUest for a density, controlvariance in order to add_92_square feet of GRFA to an existing dv,,elling_unit on the top floor of tie Sunbird Lodge. App i icant: Sunbi rd Lodge Tom Braun explained that at the meeting of March 12, 1984, the applicants had two requests, and the request to add•an employee unit was granted. The request to add 92 square feet of GRFA was tabled because of some question concerning the number of kitchens allowed at the lodge. The staff met with the applicant to resolve the issue concerning how many units in the Sunbird Lodge may have kitchens. A court order limited the number to 13, but the Community Development department erroneously issued a building permit for the installation of another kitchen in the fall of 1983. To allow for a kitchen in the 5th floor unit, the applicants agreed to remove a kitchen from another unit and have agreed to an on --site inspection. The end result would be 14 legal kitchens. Bruce Parton, applicant, stated that the unit was not functional, and he was trying to improve an existing unit, not add another unit. Discussion centered around whether or not the added GRFA would be adding bulk and mass. Braun reminded the board that they must establish a hardship and Patten felt that this request was more for convenience. Rapson felt that this was a condition not generally applicable to other situations. Edwards felt that there was a physical hardship here, Piper stated that the ledge was not habitable space, Donovan felt that the board did not have a tool with which to approve the variance. Trout felt that the board had approved the employee unit with the result that the applicant was left wit.h.,the need to expand the adjacent unit. Pierce felt the density and bulk were not being increased and Piper agreed. Trout moved and Pierce seconded to approve the requested GRFA variance. Rapson suggested adding the site inspection of kitchens to the motion, but Braun felt that in light of what had gone on in the past, plus the letter of commitment from the applicant, the staff would be aware of the need to inspect the units. Donovan pointed out that originally both top floor units were employee units. The vote was 5-1 with Donovan against because she felt that the board did not have a tool with which to ap rove the variance. ltffy 4. Reouest for an exterior alteration to the Village Center, Building D at 122 Meadow Drive. Applicant: Fred Hibberd 1 _ Peter Patten explained the request by first showing a time lapse movie from two locations. First from the top of the TRC looking southeast, then from the west side. He pointed out the "lost tourist" autos and the way the pedestrians avoided the sidewalk in front of the Village Center and walked down the street. Delivery problems were evident on both on both the east and west ends of the Village Center building. Patten explained that the planning staff encouraged Hibberd to treat his application as a master plan and to include one cot-aprehensive proposal. PEC -3- 4/10/84 Patten shored a site plan and explained that there was a loading problem on east side with no loading zone. This would be overcome with the joint loading facility shared by the Sonnenalp. Patten then said the loading zone on the west side would be removed to help to get pedestrians onto the sidewalk. The loading on this side would be internalized adjacent to the building. Patten explained that the two story addition on the east end was the same height at la Tour and the eave line would continue across. He explained that there would be a roof over the steps which went down to Building A. The major redesign of the sid4,ralk included placing it closer to the street, and also they were Trade easier to get onto coming from Crossroads. The street would be 26 feet wide with snow storage areas between the street and the sidewalk. The retail fronts were to be redesigned to better relate to the sidewalk, and there would be a sriall amount of square footace added to each store, along with a redesigning of the stairs to the Toymaker's Trail. Patten described the Urban Design Guide Plan with relation to the sub -area concepts 18 through 22. He then stated the proposal complied with Commercial Care IS zone district's requirements. The setback variance was requested in order to share the loading dock with the Sonnenalp. The loading building would overlap the property Tine and would be constructed at the request of the staff as a solution to the loading problems for both projects. Patten read 8 conditions for approval. Hibberd discussed the conditions and stated that he would feel more comfortable if the Town could set a date when the improvements in sub -area 720 would be done. He added that he would Tike to have the Town remove the snow if it needed to be hauled off-site, but that he would otherwise install and maintain the sidewalks. The west end was discussed with some of the board feeling that something should be done to make the garage entrance more appealing. Hibberd stated that he intended to paint the interior of the.garage. Pierce suggested a garage door or gate, and Hibberd said he would take the suggestion under advisement. He pointed out that a gate was a major maintenance factor. Rick Baldwin, architect for the project, explained how the steps and sidewalks would work and said that the sidewalk would be 8 feet wide. Parking in the parking area in the building was explained by "ibberd who stated that the shop owners had assigned parking spaces, but that the studio condos did not have any parking spaces in the building. Patten explainedthat the applicant was required to pay for parking spaces in the Village Parking Structure and was not allowed to put parking on his site. Piper stated that he had many letters of oppositon from tlery lapin and from the condo owners in Buildings A, B, and C. Loading on the west end was discussed again. Kathy Warren, representing the owners in Buildings A, B and C explained that the property owners did have many opposing ideas, but that they.had met with Hibberd and the problem areas had been resolved and she had a letter to submit to the permanent file from the Village Center Association to Hibberd agreeing to several items. Patten pointed out that this would be an agreement that the Town would not be a part of. • a PEC -4- 4/9/84 . Ann Louthan, President of the Building D Condo Association, explained that the condos in Building D did not have any parking spaces in the building, but needed a place to park while they unloaded their autos. She felt that more than one space was needed, and the autos needed to be in the spaces about 30 minutes. Hibberd explained that there would be no problem with parking near the doors, but the cars could not be left in the loading zone. Louthan asked if the condo owners in Building D mould be paying for any of the improvements, and Hibberd replied that they would not. Louthan mentioned that the condo owners felt the changes to the building would be a great improvement. Rapson was concerned with the appearance of the west end when the riprap wall was removed, and especially from the point of view of the tourists coming up Willow Bridge Road. He felt it would be better to have an entrance that people could not see. Hibberd replied that he had had to replace garage doors three times. He felt that a face lift would be enough to improve the entrance. Rapson asked about exterior lighting, and Hibberd replied the one wooden larp would be replaced with lamp posts, and Baldwin felt that the display lights in the shops would help to light the sidewalk. Rapson moved and Edwards seconded to approve the side setback variance for the loading berth per the staff memo dated A ril 5, 1984. The vote was 6-0in favor. Rapson moved and Trout seconded to aq rove the exterior alterations, for the comolied►,iththe Urban Des? n Considerations 1 iiiru 9. Included in the motion were the eight conditions listed on pace 6 of the memo with extra attention to the chances on the west end o; the building. The vote was 6-0 in favor. 5. Request for a density control variance in order to enclose a hot tub at Lot 8, Block 5, Vail Village lst Filing. Applicant: Velda B. Wyche Tom Braun explained that at the February 13th meeting of the PEC a side setback variance was approved to allow for an extensive remodel of this residence, one element of which was a hot tub on a rooftop deck. This application was to enclose the hottub with a greenhouse type of enclosure that would add 72 square feet of GRFA. He added that the staff recommended denial because no hardship had been established. Tim Clark, architect for the applicant, read the letter of request. He explained that the space would be unheated and was without direct access from the inside of the unit. He felt that the granting of the variance would not be detrimental and also felt that the strict interpretation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, and that it would not be a grant of special privilege. Donovan felt that she could not support the request because there would then be 0 BALbWTN ASSOC IATES ARCHITECTS, INC. 1000 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, WEST x� i V�IL, COLORADO, t 81557 .��� • (303)476-4433 .• 23 may 1983 Y n • t ar n.e a?tares -, ! r- r e rrgr ✓iy 3! VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS r r y r €, S! t on S } PREFACE The Village Center complex, for reasons not abundantly clear, has been V designed as a detached or remote 'pocket' of the Commercial Core II-- 1' Lionshead area:,for purposes of compliance to, -the Design Guide Plan despite its physical proximity At the fringe of the Commercial Core Ini �- fa,ti area. We have assumed the reasons for this classification stem from f the scale of the buildings, the nature of the building components and materials, and the Potentialmethodsfor 'softening' ande ' izing' this complex. We feed, in conjunction with this CCIlclassifica 4; k i coms Y tion there exists a strong link to the CCI design guiddlines and have therefore attempted to plan and design toward a reasonable combination i of the two sets of guidelines, knowing that a strict adherence'to either one of the Guide Plans may result in a 'foreign' solution. We have further attempted to address the specific items relating to this site which were the focus of the CCI Urban Design Guide Plan. Many of the desired objectives must be address Jointly b ropert oraners and: the Town of Vail as neither has total control in the imple ,,.,, mentation of the objective solutions. This process is complicated by the fact that many of the goals sought by the UDGP are quite major in '. x ; `{<• magnitude and therefore require long range plannin$ , g g piece- meal bud etin and interim solutions that can later be united with other elements 3n rdinated -effort to form the desired end result. � � coo _ - - " ". .. y :.' - - 1 -. :'t,. 1 L . E.0 L •F`Yi .t d t S. .!�1! ..,.. + h 4 F� �rS �'�. �r'�C. This request for Exterior `Alterations and Modifications in the CCI/CCII Area is directed toward three specific'improvement,^areas of the Village Center Complex, in conjunction with the UDGP and the Design Considerations. 1. Pedestrian site access and entry to the Toymakers (Trail Shop. 2. Commercial expansion of grade level shops in BuildingD� f I Ctl t I Park'.he existing' - 'Pocket 3. Commercial development addition to the east of t These three areas -of improvement will be implemented as separate projects but are addressed here in general terms in an effort to develop a master :,F'�•s; plan and begin initial discussions concerning the coordination of elements r<. of the UDGP beyond the control of the applicant. An apparent order of A,....`,.•" implementation is dictated by the degree of involvement and timing required h by the aspects of the UDGP that are controlled by the Town of Vail. This would indicate that the Toymakers Trail entry and the west landscaped area : would be pursued first, the eastern commercial addition would be developed as the second phase and the commercial Building 'D' expansions would be " r; the final implementation allowing the majority of time to be devoted to z coordinating a plan to achieve the Town's specific goals relating to thissite. ' t4 VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 23 May 1983 penetration reduction by any active function elimination it should be noted that Page two URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 1. PEDESTRIANIZATION: implementation of the traffic circle identified in the UDGP and Under the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan it would be desirable to create and reinforce a separate pedestrian walk along E. Meadow Y' Drive that would allow the pedestrian to pass adjacent to the com- mercial shops in the area and be separate from the required traffic created by the shuttle busses, delivery trucks and other necessary, yk but reduced, traffic along this thoroughfare. At present, the ped- estrian is forced into the street competing for space with the vehicular traffic when approaching the Village Center from the west, way several improvements that exist now will be modifidd and expanded. east or south. The approach from the east forces the foot traffic to share the narrow street with the busses, control gates, bicycles and to walk around the traffic -limiting posts, due to the discon- the existing open pocket park the pedestrian will be drawn into the tinuity of sidewalks along the Sonnenalp property. The same is true when approaching from the west along the Talisman Lodge property. The pedestrian approaching the Village Center from the south has is forced into the street away from the park. The park will also be the advantage of walking on the brick paver walkway. Although it is not physically separated from the limited vehicular traffic, it $ does at least designate a space specifically for the pedestrian. Unfortunately, this walkway currently terminates at the edge of the Village Center entry driveway on Willow Bridge Road. Once the pedestrians reach the apparent safety of the Village Center 40 ..., .. T0. ^- .. north side circulation system they must contend with a variety of walkways impeded7by the numerous ups and downs of the currently required steps on the site. While these steps serve their function they detract from the pedestrian experience and can become a poten- tial hazard when icy or snow packed. k: This proposal allows for the separation of pedestrian and vehicular .by allowing the pedestrian to make a transition from the paver,� walkway accross the driveway and onto the site at the north side of�'�r the driveway and continue along the shop facades ona landscaped, elevated, ramped walkway unimpeded by anymore exterior steps than are absolutely necessar y,. and continue off the site to bhe linking g walk proposed to the east in front of the Sonnenalp . � . t , � °� tea, ! .,�� • 2. VEHICLE PENETRATION• T 3 While this proposal does not address further vehicle or r>P penetration reduction by any active function elimination it should be noted that a portion of this site was donated to the Town of Vail to enhance implementation of the traffic circle identified in the UDGP and r*• allowing for the future reduction of vehicular traffic introduced into the area. STREETSCAPE FRAMEWORK: To enhance the walking experience along the proposed lowered walk- way several improvements that exist now will be modifidd and expanded. By placing an additional small commercial building to the east of the existing open pocket park the pedestrian will be drawn into the park rather than the current condition where the passing pedestrian is forced into the street away from the park. The park will also be of $ �L . .. ' .... .. 40 ..., .. T0. ^- .. �J VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 23 May 1983 Page three 'closed' on three sides creating a finished perimeter and the directional focus of an activity center rather than a seldom used exposed open face. . In addition to the improved activity center of the park And in conjunction with.:the desired constriction of the East Meadow ..Drive bus and delivery traffic route, a wider, more visible " .landscaped area is proposed to further separate .the pedestrian way from the roadway and its related traffic. 4. STREET ENCLOSURE: The outdoor room that is created by the Village Center and the Crossroads Building falls within the comfortable height-to=width ratio calculations. This space is however, not perceived as a comfortable, enclosed space'due to the random nature of the ele- ments creating the 'room'. The east and west.ends of the 'room are not closed by structdres and appear to be wide open. Addition- ally, the north and south walls do very little to aid in the enclosures of the 'room', as they angle off in opposing directions destroying any perceived enclosure as the ed t i p es r an moves through the space. The proposed commercial additions to the VillAge Center Building" D' will help in reducing the scale of this building allowing it to better related to pedestrians and provide a focus for their attention. 5. STREET EDGE Because of the open nature of the street between Crossroads Shopping Center and the Village Center Shops, and the random irregularity of r their facades, a strong definition of the street edge must be created { by means other than the building facades. This proposal suggests ' - that the expanded landscaping area created by the reduction in width of East Meadow Drive be developed to more strongly establish the.y.'` street edge. This landscaping area:•should be quite effective in p defining the street edge due to the higher degree of.visibility ,f created by the sloping of the planting areas from the roadway tip to l;I 'the elevated walkway—large trees in this area will also reinforce this road definition.R'`, FAY . t 6. BUILDING HEIGHT: This proposal suggests improvements to existing structures` with estab- lished heights. It addresses methods of reducing apparent building ` + height by the addition of small single story commercial expansions to better relate to the pedestrian traversing the elevated walkway: In addition to this pedestrian/shop relationship, the elevated walk- way and shop windows allow for a visual focus for people passing by r on the shuttle buses. The height of the proposed building at the east side of the property will be low to perserve the public view of the mountain from the i proposed vehicular turn -around and park area, while screening out some of the clutter to the south. VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 23 May 1983 Page four f 7. VIEWS: The major view corridor relating to development on this site is the distant view of the mountain as seen from both vehicles and pedestrians approaching from the north from the Frontage Road and from Crossroads. As pointed out in the UDGP a low structure could be built in this area without effecting this view corridor In fact, the latest existing addition to the Village Center demon-. strated this concept. The proposed additional.structure in this r area will respect this view corridor and serve to complete the, near focal point of the pocket park. ::.. ZONING CODE ITEMS 1. DENSITY CONTROL: This proposal makes no addition to the existing residential space and therefore does not increase the density impact upon the site. 2. LANDSCAPE AREA REDUCTION: When all phases of these proposal improvements have been imple- mented there will be a net increase in landscaped area related to the site. 3. PARKING: Additional parking spaces required by the increase to the retail shops and/or office spaces could not be added without detrimental effect to the site and additional vehicular penetration. :Part of the additional retail space created occurs in the form of expan- sions to existing shops and therefore may not necessitate more' parking for additional shop personnel. Parking for newly created shops or offices will be accommodated by participation in the parking fund or some other means. ARCHITECTURAL/LANDSCAPE CONSIDERATIONS The proposed building expansion to the east will be a matching Farchi- tectural design to the recently completed addition; now containing' La Tour restaurant and several smaller commercial retail shops. 'his implies that the roof forms and wall materials will match the color. 3 � L and texture of the recent addition. The proposed pocket park/plaza iE 1r Frr will be built with brick pavers, as an extension f- the proposed.walk "- ways along the north side of the Village Center Shops.. This continu- ontinu ation ation of paving materials will encourage pedestrian activity into the plaza. Accent lighting on the shops, lighted windows and the street- treet lamp lamp will help make this area more attractive, and safer in the hours- w; of darkness. The larger planter with public benches will be provided. Signage will, of course, be provided by individual shops in accordance with the Town of Vail sign ordinance and design guides. Deliveries will utilize the existing loading areas, or those delivery areas gener- ated by revised urban planning designs. The existing gas meters on the eastern end of the site will be relocated to the south, and screened. Trash storage and collection will remain in the same basic areas where they currently exist. Project Application Date 4/50 /A�L Projectprirry Project Description: Contact Person and Phone 7 62.22e�- Owner, Address and Phone: 15 l►I► . ► }►� I% iti Architect, Address and Phone: 2 1 Legal Description: Lot 12— Block Comments: — Filing _ V \/ i _.._ - , Zone 0 Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval the printery/vail IUWH of Vag 75 south frontage road pail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Craig Snowdon Snowdon --Hopkins Architects 201 East Gore Creek Vail, Co. 81657 Office of community development May 21, 1984 RE: Berkowitz Addition Dear Craig: • The following is a synopsis of the comments made by the Design Review Board at their May 16th meeting: 1. Conflict with existing gabled roof and proposed flat roof. 2. The proposed addition looks "like an addition". 3. There is a conflict with styles of architecture when considering existing with proposed, treatment should be consistent. 4. Landscaping on the site would seem to be appropriate as a buffer in the rear of the home and around the parking area (if it can be designed to withstand the winter season). Please feel free to call me with any_guestions you may have. I will -hope to see your new submittal by Wednesday, May 23, 1984. Sincerely, Thomas Braun Town Planner ENCL. TB/rme *Project Name:15� Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Project Application i Project Name: M �WA©t7SQ Project Description: Contact Person and Phonei �Cf Owner, Address and Phone:��� tC{) Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: 76'1 -Z-,i Cb B1 & i8 o,,.dlW 1e5 Block(( Filing Zone . Design Review Board &4 Motion by: _ Seconded by: AP Summary; Town Planner Date: Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval ' - theprJeteryNall . Project Name: Prninnt rlacrrintinn- Project Application Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block, Filing Comments: ra IN 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Kurt Cedarburg l000 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado, 81657 Dear Kurt, otfice of community development May 18, 1984 RE: Craddock Remodel Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 1st On May 16, 1984, the Design Review Board gave the Craddock Remodel final approval. The only changes were that a metal, rather than wood, entry, gate would be used (without the arch) and the new landscape plan. I would like to have one more copy of the landscape plan for our records. Thanks for your cooperation on this project. Sincerely, Kristan Pritz Town Planner ENCL . KP/rme Project Application * Project Name: Frampton Residence Project Description: Single family residence ,neva construction) Contact Person and Phone Duane Piper 949-7074 Owner, Address and Phone: liarr)r Fromm= t on Architect, Address and Phone: Box 5560 Avon Colorado 81620 Date Aril 30 1384 Legal Description: Lot 3 , Block , Filing Vail Villace I I , Zone R Comments: Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: L'Y\ APPROVAL Summary: Date DISAPPROVAL ��.4 a oAlAIDa ar 'ki&N 1 6 MW - Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval the pdMerylvaii • • 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Duane Piper Wheeler - Piper Architects 2077 Borth frontage Road Vail, Colorado, 81657 Dear Duane, office of community development May 21, 1984 RE: Frampton Residence Lot 3, Block 3, Vail Village llth. On May 16, 1984, the Design Review Board gave final approval to the Frampton House if the following information is submitted to staff: 1. Driveway slope figure. 2. A utility plan. 3. One of the two woodburning fireplaces is removed or substituted by one clean woodburning or gas stove. I have enclosed the Fireplace Ordinance for you to review (please see page 3.) 1 did talk to Peter about the ordinance and the intent is one fireplace per unit. Gary Murrain, Town Building Inspector, will also require that a secondary gas fireplace is designed according to the manufacturer's specifications and not designed as a woodburning fireplace. Please see the enclosed memo on gas fireplaces. In respect to the flood plain, I want you to know that the Booth Creek 100 year flood plain is at approximately 8294 feet. Your slab elevation is 8,295.5 feet. These figures are a bit close in my opinion. If you want to berm and landscape Tract B up to the bank of Booth Creek (lot is located directly west from the Frampton property) you will need: 1. The property owner's approval. 2. Staff and Town Engineer approval as well as Design Review Board approval. Our records show that Vail Associates owns Tract B. However, Vail Associates is in the process of deeding many parcels of land to the Town. Perhaps Tract B is part of this process. If the Town owns the property, Rich Caplan or Town Council would have to approve the project. I think the berm and landscaping would be a good safeguard. (Tract C is also owned by Vail Associates). I have also enclosed Lodge. Parking is on give me a call. Once location. It was my Sincerely, i�h� �� Kristan Pritz Town Planner KP/rme ENCL. C] page two an unofficial land use inventory for the Sitzmark the second page. If you have more questions please again,.I apologize for the mistake on the site day of glory! . Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Project Application Date __ MWI ' - — Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: y ' Legal Description: Lot � ,Block Filing zone� Comments: — Design Review Board Date U, Motion by: M Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: �1 rrAT�i 0 - Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: the prinlery/vail f� IBM of jai 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Kurt Cedarburg 1000 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado, 81657 Dear Kurt, office of community development May -18, 1984 RE: Halpert Garage Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Village 8th On May 26, 1984, the Design Review Board approved plans for the Hal Pert Garage Addition. I will need one more copy of the revised plans. Thanks for redesigning your project in order to protect the aspen gees. Sincerely, K�, �a n R 1-4 Kristan Pritz Town Planner ENCL. KP/rme 0 NO ofvTf� 75 south frontage road nail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 office of community development DESIGN REVIEW BOARD May 16, 1984 PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FROM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD - MAY 1984 1. Summers Residence Lot 1 B, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision lst. A. Construct a snow fence to protect the bog area at the rear of the s ito, B. Evaluate the orientation of the house. C. Revegeta.te the sewer easement once the easement is moved to the east edge of the lot. D. The project must be reviewed by the Town Engineer to insure that design mitigates powder avalanche impacts as per the Mear's Report. E. Provide materials and color samples. 2. Walker --Ray Garage Addition - lot 28, #1 Vail Meadows A. Develop a stronger connection to the house, i. e. the garage should be moved closer to the house. B. Consider a passible location for a second garage. C. Consider designing a higher garage door to allow for snow removal equipment. 3. Craddock Remodel: Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 1st. A. Finish the design of the chimneys. B. Re-evaluate adequacy of the landscape plan. C. Provide materials and color samples. D. Provide utility verification form. 4. Halpert Garage; lot G, block 1, Vail Village 8th. A. Address the locatfion and impact of the garage on the aspen trees located on the southwest corner of the house. B. Design a catch basin for oil from cars parked in the garage. • • fowl 75 south frontage road vall, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM : Kristan Pritz DATE: May 10, 1984 office of community development SUBJECT: Village Center Addition and site improvements. I have enclosed background information for you on the Village Center Project. On April 9, 1984, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviewed the project in respect to: 1. A side setback variance for the loading berth on the east side of the building. 2. The exterior alterations to the building. The Planning and Environmental Commi'ssi'on approved both requests unanimously. The staff memo includes a project description, review of the project:' -s compliance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan, Commercial Core II Zoning Compliance, and staff recommendation concerning the variance. Minutes from the Planning and Environmental Commission meeting are enclosed. Baldwin Associates Architects, Incorporated have written a report that reviews their design concepts for the Village Center proposal. These comments are also enclosed in the packet of background information. • PRESENT Diana Donovan Scott Edwards Gordon Pierce Duane Piper Howard Rapson Will Trout Planning and Environmental Commission April 9, 1984 STAFF PRESENT Peter Patten Tom Braun Kristan Pritz Larry Eskwith Betsy Rosolack ABSENT JIM V I ELE 114uL�V' 4 The meeting was called to order at 3:00 pm by Duane Piper, chairman. 1. Approval of minutes of March 12 and March 26. Pierce moved and Donavan econded to approve therected minutes of March 12. The vote was 6--0 in favor. ut corrected t arch 26 minutes so that his reason for voting against the So alp s I development district would read: "because he did not feel any project` ld be approved that would have any negative effect on TOV property (i.e. the b she'r paving, trees, or other improvements existing)." Donovan moved andson seconded��,� pprove the March 26 minutes. as corrected. The vote was 6- in favor. 2. Request for a front setback variance of 1.6 feet for an existing buildiin of the Vail Racquet Club Townhomes located at 5770 Bi horn Road. Applicant: Vail Racquet Club Townhomes Tom Braun explained the request. He stated that Buildin I had been constructed only 18.4 feet from thfront property line, resulting 'n a 1.6 foot encorachment into the setback. Braun added that the variance woui have no impact on existing or potential uses and structu res, but that there w no evidence to indicate a physical hardship, merely huin error. Walter Kirch, the applicant, said t t he fouod that the Town of Vail owned the adjoining property, and that he const Nred king for either a land swap or a land acquisition, but decided to first k for a variance. He felt that the granting of this variance would not con s . ute a grant of special privilege because of other similar variances in uding in 1981 for lot 12 in Bighorn 4th which was 18.2 feet from the proper line. He -ded that granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the p lic health, safet welfare, and felt that he qualified because the strict r literal interpretatioti�and enforcement would result in practical difficult and would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of of r properties in the same district. Trout moved_ and Pierce s �onded to approve th a---- request because the granting of the variance would rrot.constit a grant of special privilege, and would not be detrimental to the pub�T'rc,_ lth, safety or welfare and was warranted because the strict or literal interpr a'tAi and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practica diffic Uy.,or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives, the zoning code. The vote was 6-0 in favor. FL(, -L- 4/`1 4 L. 3. Request for a density control variance in order to add 92 square feet of GRFA to an ex siinq dwelling unit on the t_ op floor of the Sunbird Lodge. 4p� licsnt: Sunbird lodge Tom Braun explained that at the meeting of March 12, 1984, the applicants had two requests, and the request to add -an employee unit was granted. The request' to add 92 square feet of GRFA was tabled because of some question concerning the number of kitchens allowed at the lodge. The staff met with the applicant to resolve the issue concerning how many units in the Sunbird Lodge may have kitchens. A court order limited the number to 13, but the Community Development department erroneously issued a building permit for the installation of another kitchen in the fall of 1983. To allow for a kitchen in the 5th floor unit, the applicants agreed to remove a kitchen from another unit and have agreed to an on-site inspection. The end result would be 14 legal kitchens. Bruce Parton, applicant, stated that the unit was not functional, and he was trying to improve an existing unit, not add another unit. Discussion centered around whether or not the added GRFA would be adding bulk and mass. Braun reminded the board that they must establish a hardship and Patten felt that this request was more for convenience. Rapson felt that this was a condition not generally applicable to other situations. Edwards felt that there was a physical hardship here, Piper stated that the ledge was not habitable space, Donovan felt that the board did not have a tool with which to approve the variance. Trout felt that the board had approved the employee unit with the result that the applicant was left wit.h..the. need _to. expand. the adjacent unit. Pierce felt the density and bulk were not being increased and Piper agreed. Trout moved and Pierce seconded to approve the requested GRFA variance. Rapson suggested adding the site inspection of kitchens to the motion, but Braun felt that in light of what had gone on in the past, plus the letter of commitment from the applicant, the staff would be aware of the need to inspect the units. Donovan pointed out that originally both top floor units were employee units. The vote was 5-1 with Donovan aaainst because she felt that the board did not have a tool with which to a� rave the variance. �;l 4. Request for an exterior alteration to the Village _Center, Building D ;4 at 122 ,Meadow Drive. Applicant: Fr d H� ibberd Peter Patten explained the request by first showing a time lapse movie from two locations. First from the top of the TRC looking southeast, then from the west side. He pointed out the "lost tourist" autos and the way the pedestrians avoided the sidewalk in front of the 'Village Center and walked down the street. Delivery problems were evident on both on both the east and west ends of the Village Center building. Patten explained that the planning staff encouraged Hibberd to treat his application as a master pian and to include one comprehensive proposal. PEC -3- 4/9/84 ` Patten showed a site plan and explained that there was a loading problem on east side with no loading zone. This would be overcome with the joint loading facility shared by the Sonnenalp. Patten then said the loading zone on the west side would be removed to help to get pedestrians onto the sidewalk. The loading on this side would be internalized adjacent to the building. Patten explained that the tWo story addition on the east end was the same height at La Tour and the eave line would continue across. He explained that there would be a roof over the steps which went down to Building A. The major redesign of the sidewalk included placing it closer to the street, and also they were made easier to get onto coming from Crossroads. The street would be 26 feet wide with snow storage areas between the street and the sidewalk. The retail fronts were to be redesigned to better relate to the sidewalk, and there would be a small amount of square footage added to each store, along with a redesigning of the stairs to the Toymaker's Trail. Patten described the Urban Design Guide Plan with relation to the sub -area concepts 18 through 22. He then stated the proposal complied with Commercial Core II zone district's requirements. The setback variance was requested in order to share the loading dock with the Sonnenalp. The loading building would overlap the property line and would be constructed at the request of the staff as a solution to the loading problems for both projects. Patten read 8 conditions for approval. Hibberd discussed the conditions and stated that he would feel more comfortable if the Town could set a. date when the improvements in sub -area #20 would be done. He. added that he would like to have the Town remove the snow if it needed to be hauled off-site, but that he would otherwise install and maintain the sidewalks. The west end was discussed with some of the board feeling that something should be done to make the garage entrance more appealing. Hibberd stated that he intended to paint the interior of the garage. Pierce suggested a garage door or gate, and Hibberd said he would take the suggestion under advisement. He pointed out that a gate was a major maintenance factor. Rick Baldwin, architect for the project, explained how the steps and sidewalks would work and said that the sidewalk would be 8 feet wide. Parking in the parking area in the building was explained by Hibberd who stated that the shop owners had assigned parking spaces, but that the studio condos did not have any parking spaces in the building. Patten explained that the applicant was required to pay for parking spaces in the Village Parking Structure and was not allowed to put parking on his site. Piper stated that he had many letters of oppositon from ;dery Lapin and from the condo owners in Buildings A, B, and C. Loading on the west end was discussed again. Kathy Warren, representing the owners in Buildings A, B and C explained that the property owners did have many opposing ideas, but that they had met with Hibberd and the problem areas had been resolved and she had a letter to submit to the permanent file from the Village Center Association to Hibberd agreeing to several items. Patten pointed out that this would be an agreement that the Town would not be a part of. • • 0 PEC -4- 4/9/84 Ann Louthan, President of the Building D Condo Association, explained that the condos in Building D did not have any parking spaces in the building, but needed a place to park while they unloaded their autos. She felt that more than one space was needed, and the autos needed to be in the spaces about 30 minutes. Hibberd explained that there would be no problem with parking near the doors, but the cars could not be left in the loading zone. Louthan asked if the condo owners in Building D would be paying for any of the improvements, and Hibberd replied that they would not. Louthan mentioned that the condo owners melt the changes to the building would be a great improvement. Rapson was concerned with the appearance of the west end when the riprap wall was removed, and especially from the point of view of the tourists coming up Willow Bridge Road. He felt it would be better to have an entrance that people could not see. Hibberd replied that he had had to replace garage doors three times. He felt that a face lift would be enough to improve the entrance. Rapson asked about exterior lighting, and Hibberd replied the one wooden lamp would be replaced with lamp posts, and Baldwin felt that the display lights in the shops would help to light the sidewalk. RaLson moved and Edwards seconded to a _rave the side setback variance for the loading bert�er the staff mer�o dated apr��l 5> 1°84• The vote was 6-0 in -favor. Rapsonmoved and Trout seconded to compl j ed wi CWh e Urbari Des i n� _ Cons i d were the ei hg t conditions listed on the changes on the of N approve erations page uildi the -1 t of t exterior alterations, for they Fu 9. Included in the aotion memo with vote 'was tra attention to .in favor. 5.R�uest for a density.control variance in order to enclose a hot tub at Lot 8, Block 5, Vail Villa e 1st riling Applicant: Velda B. Wyche Tom Braun explained that at the February 13th meeting of the PEC a side setback variance was approved to allow for an extensive remodel of this residence, one element of which was a hot tub on a rooftop deck. This application was to enclose the hottub with a greenhouse type of enclosure that would add 72 square feet of GRFA. He added that the staff recommended denial because no hardship had been established. Tim Clark, architect for the applicant, read the letter of request. He explained that the space would be unheated and was without direct access from the inside of the unit. He felt that the granting of the variance would not be detrimental and also felt that the strict interpretation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, and that it would not be a grant of special privilege. Donovan felt that she could not support the request because there would then be 0 MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission • FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 5, 1984 E SUBJECT: Request for exterior alteration and a side setback variance for Village Center Building D. Applicant: Fred Hibberd I. BACKGROUND This proposal began to be discussed in June of 1983 when the applicant and his architect applied for a commercial addition on the east side of the property and a redevelopment of the Toymaker's Trail shop's stairs on the west end. We discussed redeveloping the entire sidewalk/landscaped area on the north and west sides of the building, as well. The planning staff encouraged the applicant to treat the proposal as a "master plan" concept which meant making it one entire comprehensive proposal, including the new sidewalk and landscaping on the west and north sides, the new stairs for Toymaker's Trail, retail store front expansions on the north elevation, new stairway entries/exits from the sidewalk to the street, the two-story commercial addition on the east and the creation of new loading areas on both the east and west ends of the building. The lack of adequate loading facilities on the east end of the property is the major issue which held the project up so long. The staff encouraged the applicant to explore a joint loading facility with the adjacent property to the east, Hotel Sonnenalp, as they were proposing a major redevelopment on their property. It was not until this past Tuesday, April 3rd, that the Sonnenalp's proposal was approved on second reading of the Special Development District Ordinance. Also, this somewhat complex proposal has received a great deal of review from the various departments of the Town, including Public Works/Transportation, Fire and Police. The proposal in front of the Planning and Environmental Commission today has accomplished the objectives and requirements of all the various departments. (See memos attached from Public Works.and Fire Department.) The Village Center project remains, for reasons still unclear to the current planning staff, in the Commercial Core II zone district. However, the project is located in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan area and must be evaluated with regard to those documents. Thus, this memorandum will proceed in five more sections: first, a description of the proposal; second, an evalua- tion of how the plan meets the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan; third, a look at compliance with Commercial Core II zone district requirements; fourth, a look at the requested setback variance; and lastly, a staff recommendation. Village Center 0- 4./5/$4 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL (See attached proposed site plan.) The sidewalk on the north and west sides of the Village Center retail shops has never worked with regard to being a viable public pedestrian route. Historically, there's been a lack of continuity of the walk on the east end (people choose to walk on the street) and the on -street loading area on the west end scares people away from the sidewalk (traveling northward) and again onto the street. To solve these problems, the proposal is to relocate the on -street loading area to an off-street one on the west end of the building. This required relocating the driveway entering the lower parking garage for the condominium owners. The Town staff feels strongly that we should not reduce loading facilities in this particular area, and we are exploring the possibiility of creating a new "on -street" loading area to the southwest of its present location on the west side of the street south of the Kiandr's driveway. Thus, the brick pavers which exist on the east side of Willow Bridge Road north of the bridge and the elimination of the loading area would invite people to continue walking on the sidewalk making a more pleasant.and safer pedestrian experience. The new sidewalk, as called for in the UDGP, would be lower to relate more to the street and have several short stairways to East Meadow Drive to make it easier to flow on and off the walkway. The new walkway is Pleasantly buffered from the street with landscaped berms which have been designed to handle the required snow storage. Several retail store fronts will be expanded to the north between 6 and 9 feet to maintain a pleasant window shopping experience along the walkway. As one approaches the eastern portion of the walkway, the existing "La Tour Plaza is improved by finishing it to a three sided enclosure with the new commercial addition containing two new retail spaces on the plaza level. The pedestrian then may enter this pocket park area to shop, dine outdoors (in summer), sit on one of the benches or. continue easterly on the walk which will connect directly onto the Sonnenalp property. The redevelopment of the Village Center walkway combined with the Sonnenalp's proposed walkway completes an entire pedestrian loop system beginning. at the Covered Bridge Plaza, up Bridge Street, west on Gore Creek Drive, north on Willow Bridge/Willow Bridge Road and east on the Village Center/Sonnenalp walkway back to the Covered Bridge Plaza. The joint loading facility on the east with Sonnenalp vastly improves the service and delivery situation for the easterly shops of the Village Center. complex. Currently, the lack of loading spaces in this area have created a situation where illegal loading occurs in front of "La Tour Plaza" and this hinders the Town's bus traffic flow. The combination of the new joint loading dock (partially on Village Center property and partially on Sonnenalp's site) with the northerly expansion of the landscaped berm will effectively eliminate the current illegal loading activities. U Village Cent -3- 4./5/84 A new walkway from the pedestrian walk will maintain access for Building A of Village Center and will have a roof covering the north portion of the stairs to architecturally tie together the Sonnenalp and Village Center projects as well as provide some protection from the elements for the walkways' users. III. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN (even though in CCII) A. COMPLIANCE WITH PURPOSE SECTION FOR COMMERCIAL CORE I The Commercial Core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in..a predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village urban design guide pian and design considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distringuish the village. We find that the proposal is in compliance with and furthers the intent of the purpose section for Commercial Core I. 0 B. SUB -AREA CONCEPTS AFFECTED • (See attached Urban Design Guide Plane) There are a number of Sub -Area Concepts which are indirectly related to the Village Center project. Briefly, Sub -Area Concepts 19 and 20 relate to a number of physical design solutions to reduce the "lost tourist" who drives down Village Road and then west on East Meadow Drive looking for parking or whatever. The current proposal for Village Center recognizes this as a potential future project (Fred Hibberd gave a portion of land to the Town in 1981 toward this end) but is designed for workability without these improvements as the Town has no immediate plans for this capital improvement project. Numbers 21 and 22 relate to the last commercial addition project which was completed three years ago. Number 17 discusses improvements to the intersection of Willow Bridge Road and East Meadow Drive. A larger planter in the middle and brick paving treatment are called for. Sub -Area Concept 18 is what is being proposed for the sidewalk. It reads: "Existing walk lowered slightly to become major separated south side pedestrian route (barrier free ramps). Landscape planting buffer along roadway." N Village Center1*4W 4/5/84 C. URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 1. Pedestrianization: The objective of this project is to improve pedes- trianization in a manner directly called for by the UDGP. The staff feels this will occur if the proposal is implemented (refer to Section II of this memorandum). 2. Vehicle Penetration: The applicant has, as noted above, given land To the Town for the purpose of implementing Sub Area Concepts 19 and 20 which are attempts at a design solution for reducing vehicle pene- tration down Village Road. As the time-lapse photography the staff has conducted in this area shows, this is a major problem for this area of the Village and the problem needs to be addressed so vehicle - pedestrian conflicts can be reduced. 3. Streetsca a Framework: Streetscape framework will be vastly improved Dy construction of t e three types of improvements called for in the UDGP: 1) continuity of walkways; 2)1andscaping treatments along walkways with occasional plazas/pocket parks; 3) infill commercial storefronts. 4. Street Enclosure: The new commercial addition will duplicate the height of the 1981 "La Tour" addition and will create a comfortable 1-1/2 story enclosure on the east end of the project. Overall, the "outdoor room" created by Village Center and Crossroads falls within the comfortable ratio set out by the UDGP. 5. Street Ed e: The street edge will be improved with the new landscaped walkway delineating a clear street edge separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The commercial addition improves street edge by providing the third side enclosure to the plaza. 6. Building Height: The proposal meets the requirements of the UDGP and the Commercial Core II zone district. 7. Views and Focal Points: There are no designated view corridors in this area. The building height proposed for the commercial addition hides Building A of the project and does not intrude upon important mountain views to the south. 8. Service and Delivery: As mentioned earlier, this has been an area of concentration for this project. The situation would be greatly improved as a result of the proposal by eliminating the existing loading area on the west end and the illegal loading area on the east. Proposed is a completely enclosed loading dock on the east (used with the Sonnenalp) and a new loading area between parking garage garage entrances on the west. Also, the staff is exploring a new on -street loading area south of the Kiandra eastern driveway. These improvements will allow loading located more closely to the shops/restaurants being served and in an area which works better for the delivery person and pedestrian. • 0 0 Village Cente4-5- 4/5/84 9. Sun/Shade: The building is so massive that it will always cast shade ` down to the sidewalk area. The new commercial addition will 'cast some shade onto the new walkway; and it will be the applicant's responsibility to maintain the walk in good condition. IV. COMMERCIAL CORE II ZONE DISTRICT COMPLIANCE A. Uses: The proposed commercial uses are permitted uses in the Commercial Core II district. B. Setbacks: Required is 10 feet on all sides. The proposal complies with this except with regard to the variance for the joint loading facility discussed below. C. Coverage: 70% maximum Existing = 59% Proposed = 68% D. Landsca in : 20% minimum. The proposal provides a net increase in landscaped areas. E. Parking and Loading: The applicant will be required to pay into the parking fund the applicable amount for the commercial expansion. V. SETBACK VARIANCE A. Renest The applicant requests a 0 foot setback on the east boundary of the property to construct a joint loading dock with the Sonnenalp. The proposal is to have the loading building overlap the property line in this area. The loading facility was constructed at the request of the staff as a solution to loading problems existing in the area as well as a viable placement of the facility to enable service to both properties. B. Recommendation The Community Development Department recommends approval of the setback variance for the joint loading building as we -find a specific physical hardshi'p'in iocati.ng.it elsewhere in this area. We feel that the proposed solution is an excellent one and will adequately serve both ,properties. All impacts of the building are positive ones (refer to service/delivery section of this memorandum). 0 0 Village *er -6- 4/5/84 VI. RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the proposed Village Center project. We have spent many hours working with the applicant, his architect and the various Town of Vail departments to arrive at solutions to all the problems in this area of the Village. It should be noted that initial opposition to certain aspects of the project by Village Center condominium owners has been greatly reduced by the applicant's meeting with the owners and compromising on various elements. The staff has also spent much time with the homeowners and their representatives in explaining the project and all its revisions. We feel that the proposal represents the best solutions for all involved parties and that it will be a signifi- cant improvement to the immediate area and the Vail Village area. The following are conditions of approval: 1. The project must be constructed under a single building permit. 2. Before a building permit is issued for the project, a signed and recorded agreement by property owners of the Village Center Building D and Sonnenalp shall be presented to the Community Development Department. The agreement shall specify the mutual use of the joint loading dock to the east of the new commercial addition and outline easement agreements pertaining thereto. 3. Before any building permit is issued, the applicant shall sign a revocable right-of-way agreement with the Town. 0 4. The applicant agrees to provide for maintenance of the pedestrian sidewalk area as well as the associated landscaping constructed under the building permit. 5. The west -end loading area shall be maintained and policed by the applicant to see that it serves its intended function. The existing wood planter in this area shall be removed to allow maximum area for trucks. 6. The Town agrees to pay for the cost of removing the landscaped berm on its property in the area north of the "La Tour Plaza" if and when it decides to proceed with improvements as noted on the Urban Design Guide Plan. 7. The applicant agrees to work with the Town of Vail Fire Department in achieving the required work to the fire alarm system and exploring the possibility of doing all required fire code work (including retrofit requirements) at the same time. 8. The applicant agrees not to remonstrate against a special improvement district if and when formed for the Vail Village area. • 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 0 department of public worksliransportation M E M O R A N D U M TO: Peter Patten, Com -ity Development FROM: Stan Berryman DATE: April S, 1984 SUBJECT: VILLAGE CENTER EXPANSION PROPOSAL This memo is to notify you that the Department of Public Works/Transportation has reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the Village Center project as ammended. 0 � 0 • 42 west meadow drive vall, colorado 81657 (303)476-2200 TO: Peter Patten FROM: Dick Duran DATE: April 4, 1984 RE: Village Center Proposal 0 fire department As per our meeting yesterday, I have no problem with the proposal at this time. Having the dry pipe and yard hydrant will help the Fire Department in set-up time in the event of a fire on the south side of Village Center D or a fire in A or B buildings. The Fire Department would like to meet with the people involved. with the project in regard to the placement of the.dry hydrant and fire department connection. 1 have many concerns in regard to the construction stage which will be taken care of during the plan check. Thank you for getting all departments together and allowing us to voice our concerns. Look forward to working with you on all projects. • 0 n C VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 23 May 1983 Page two URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 1. PEDESTRIANIZATION: Under the Vail Village Urban. Design Guide Plan it would be -desirable to create and reinforce a -separate pedestrian walk along E. Meadow. Drive that would allow the pedestrian to pass adjacent to the com- mercial shops in the area and be separate from the required traffic created by the shuttle busses, delivery trucks and other necessary, but reduced, traffic along this thoroughfare. At present, the ped- estrian is forced into the street competing for space with the vehicular traffic when approaching the Village Center from the west, east or south. The approach from the east forces the.foot traffic to share the narrow street with the busses, control gates, bicycles and to walk around the traffic --limiting posts, due to the discon- tinuity of sidewalks along the Sonnenalp property. The same is true when approaching from the west along the Talisman Lodge property. The pedestrian approaching the Village Center from the. south has the advantage of walking on the brick paver walkway. Although it is not physically separated from the limited vehicular traffic, it does at least designate a space specifically for the pedestrian. Unfortunately, this walkway currently terminates at the edge of the Villege Center entry.driveway on Willow Bridge Road. Once the pedestrians reach the apparent safety of the Village Center north side circulation system they must contend with a variety of. .- walkways impeded -'.by the numerous ups and downs of the currently required steps on the site. .While these steps serve their function they detract from the pedestrian experience and can become a poten- tial hazard when icy or snow packed.. This proposal allows for the separation of pedestrian and vehicular " by allowing the pedestrian to make a transition from the.paverg�j�; walkway accross the driveway and onto the site at the north side of P E a the driveway and continue along the shop facades on a landscaped, elevated, ramped walkway unimpeded by any more exterior steps than4�: are absolutely necessary, and continue off the site to bhe linking +� walk proposed to the east in front of the Sonnenalp. 2. VEHICLE PENETRATION: While this proposal does not address further vehicle penetration or, reduction by any active function elimination it should be noted that a portion of this site was donated to the Town of Vail to enhance implementation of the traffic circle identified in the UDGP and allowing for the future reduction of vehicular traffic introduced into the area. 3. STREETSCAPE FRAMEWORK: To enhance the walking experience along the proposed lowered walk- way several improvements that exist now will be modified and expanded." By placing an additional small commercial building to the east of the existing open pocket park the pedestrian will be drawn into the park rather than the current condition where the passing pedestrian is forced into the street away from the park. The park will also be ' s • VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 23 May 1983 Page three 'closed' on three sides creating a finished perimeter and the directional focus of an activity center rather than a seldom used exposed open face. In addition to the improved activity center of the park and in conjunction with -,.the desired constriction of the East Meadow Drive bus and delivery traffic route, a wider, more visible landscaped area is proposed to further separate the pedestrian - way from the roadway and its related traffic. STREET ENCLOSURE: The outdoor room that is created -by the Village Center and the Crossroads Building falls within the comfortable height-to�width ratio calculations. This space is however, not perceived as a comfortable, enclosed space'due to the random nature of the ele- ments creating the 'room'. The east and west. ends of the 'room' are not closed by structures and appear to be wide open. Addition-r- ally, dditionally, the north and south walls do very little to aid in the enclosures of the 'room', as they angle off in opposing directions destroying any perceived enclosure as the pedestrian moves through the space. The proposed commercial additions to the Village Center Building`'D' will help in reducing the scale of .this building allowing it to better related to pedestrians and provide a focus for their attention STREET EDGE; Because of the open nature of the street between Crossroads Shopping Center and the Village Center Shops, and the random irregularity of their facades, a strong definition of the street edge must be created by means other than the building facades. This proposal suggests that the expanded landscaping area created by the reduction in width of East Meadow Drive be developed to more strongly establish the street edge. This landscaping arear'should be quite effective in a defining the street edge due to the higher degree of visibility created by the sloping of the planting areas from the roadway tip to. "the elevated walkway— large trees in this area will also reinforce this road definition. y BUILDING HEIGHT: This proposal suggests improvements to existing structures with estab- lished heights. It addresses methods of reducing apparent building height by the addition of small single story commercial expansions to better relate to the pedestrian traversing the elevated walkway:., In addition to this pedestrian/shop relationship, the elevated walk- way and shop windows allow for a visual focus for people passing by on the shuttle buses. 4. 5. 6. • • VILLAGE CENTER IMPROVEMENTS 23 May 1983 Page four 7. VIEWS: The major view corridor relating to development on this.site is the distant view of the mountain as seen from both vehicles and pedestrians approaching from the north from the Frontage Road and from Crossroads. As pointed out in the UDGP a. low structure could be built in this area without effecting this view corridor In fact, the latest existing addition to the Village Center demon strated this concept. The proposed additional structure in this area will respect this view corridor and serve to complete the near focal point of the pocket park. ZONING CODE ITEMS 1. DENSITY CONTROL: . This proposal makes no addition to.the existing residential space and therefore does not increase the density impact upon the site. 2. LANDSCAPE AREA REDUCTION: When all phases of these proposal improvements have been imple- mented there will be a net increase in landscaped area related to the site. 3. PARKING: Additional parking spaces required by the increase to the retail shops and/or office spaces could not be added without detrimental effect to the site and additional vehicular penetration. Part of the additional retail space created occurs in the form of expan- sions to existing shops and therefore may not necessitate more' parking for additional shop personnel. Parking for newly created shops or offices will be accommodated by participation in, the parking fund or some other means. : r � ARCHITECTURAL/LANDSCAPE CONSIDERATIONS s �r The proposed building expansion to the east will be a matching archi tectural design to the recently completed addition; now containing La Tour restaurant and several; smaller commercial retail shops. ;`This �A § implies that the roof forms and wall materials will match the color and texture of the recent addition.. The proposed pocket park/plaza will be built with brick pavers, as an extension �ff= the proposed -walk ontinu ways along the north side of the Village Center Shops.: This continu- ation of paving materials will encourage pedestrian activity into the ation plaza. Accent Lighting on the shops, lighted :windows and the street lamp will help make this area more attractive,and safer in the hours of darkness. The larger planter..with public benches will be provided. Signage will, of course, be provided by individual shops in accordance with the Town of Vail sign ordinance and design guides. Deliveries will utilize the existing loading areas, or those delivery areas gener- ated by revised urban planning designs. The existing gasometers on the eastern end of the site will be relocated to the south, and screened. Trash storage and collection will remain in the same basic areas where they currently exist. Project Application Date Project Name. } Project Description: RoNT poolA W .E N pc7 c�JLl"Ic�ta(�—N IJ u`D2� G('V-vEt: n9,4vE E- rfZY )AiLeA Kr-t-aoC,Z.._ Contact Person and Phone Uvpp- --(A L- L E -W F - Owner, Address and Phone: p ' AT- VA I `' o.1 l WL 44, 6 3 0 �QFIWWIM Project Application Date 27 April 1984 • _... Project Name, The Plaza Lodge Project Description: Exterior Repairs, Rewdeld ing, and Site Work al above building iI Contact Person and Phone Jed Johnson, Alan Wanzenberg& Asmeiates Ine , 850 Seventh Avenue, Suite 801 New York NY -1212) 489-2490 ,I Owner, Address and Phone: Pl a a I-QdkQ Sri M Sfree± _ anx fiB W j i I cn _ (303) 476..45.9() Architect, Address and Phone: -Tart _7nHncr^�t� Alan 'Gtlan7.Pnherg R AS$nt;:i' tPs Int -,2J 9,) 4�C),24C)n Legal Description: Lot Block ,C Filing Zone Comments: — See nftarhod Motion by: 7::E& A Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Design Review: Board C.J � MI zm'l • = v Town Planner Date: :zlz Date DISAPPROVAL El Staff Approval - the prinleryl"il laws 75 south irontage road vall, colorado 81857 (303) 476-7000 Alan Wanzenberg Obhnson Wanzenberg and Associates 850 Seventh Street Suite 801 New York, New York office of community development May 21, 1984 Dear Alan, • Congradulations on a fine submittal for the Plaza Lodge. We are looking forward to a much improved appearance for the building this summer. To confirm our conversation with you and Kathryn, I have listed the following E items to be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. i 1. Final landscape plan. 2. Construction schedule 3. Detail on paint colors. 4. Written statement addressing Vail's urban Design Guide Plan and Considerations. 5. Finalize what will be done with street lightning. F I will try to find out what will be happening with regard to the Town's street lights. If a different style is selected as the "Town street lamp I will let you know as soon as possible. f k Sincerely, I Tom Braun Town Planner ENCL TB/rme F 0 Project. Name: Project Description: 1 Project Application Date Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: l� 5 Legal Description: Lot Block ` Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date RUL Motion by: 3�1 Lrn Seconded by: 9u - APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 15- n• - Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: . - - - the prioleq/vail -. r I* 10WH of Vail [Y 75 south frontage road nail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7600 Crei;g Snowdon. 201 Gore Creek. Drive~ Vail, Colorado, 81657 RE; Summers Residence Lot 1B, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision Furst Addition Dear Craig, On May 16, 1984, the Design Review Board gave the Summer's Residence final approval contingent upon; 1. The final approval and filing of the subdivision plat for Lot 1B, Block 1, Bighorn Subdivision 1st. 2. Review of building plans for powder avalanche (Bill Andrews Town Engineer has signed off on the letter from Timothy Boyle). 3. The relocated sewer easement will be"revegetated (east edge of property). i Thanks for your cooperation! Sincerely, VIlk Kristan Pritz Town Planner ENCL. KP/rme Project Application Date it lam. W.'oject Name: Project Description: Cil A&I, r���>,o� v ��s � . U r• la�� Contact Person and Phone' Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: -- 1092 lad Ir J`rJ f4l,IY4'F+cwt Ci qy 1 " ; Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: • �J NO, of voi 75 south frontage road vall, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Rick Baldwin 1000 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado, 81657 office of community development May 21, 1984 Dear Rick, On May 14, 1984, the Design Review Board gave the Village Center Project preliminary approval. The vote was 4-0 in approval with l abstention (Rick Baldwin). The following issues must be addressed and delivered to the Community Development Department Staff by May 23, 1984. You are scheduled for the May 30th Design Review Board Meeting. 1. Design a lighting plan using Town of Vail style lights. 2. Obtain owner's approval of screen wall on south side of the building; design details for wall also needed. 3. Design details for the screening of the light in the west end garage entry. 4. Design details for overall landscaping, particularly in front of the La Tour Pocket Park. Indicate type and location of trees, ground cover, trees to be removed or reused. 5. Submit a written phasing plan for the entire project (a building permit expires if work is stopped for six months). 6. Indicate exactly where the garage improvement will be located on the north wall - show how far the treatment of the wall will extend. 7. Remove planter box in front of west loading space adjacent to garage entry. page two 8. Show drainage plan for the project, particularly.swales across sidewalk. (Please talk to the,Town Engineer if you have further questions.) 9. Show the relocated transformer and necessary screening. 10. Confirm that cement walls will be stucco and not left as plain cement walls. In addition the following conditions must be met before a building permit is issued: 1. The project must be constructed under a single building permit. 2. Before a building permit is issued for the project, a signed and recorded agreement by property owners of the Village Center Building D and Sonnenalp shall be presented to the Community Development Department. The agreement shall specify the mutual use of the joint loading dock to the east of the new commercial addition and outline easement agreements pertaining thereto. 3. Before any building permit is issued, the applicant shall sign a revocable right-of-way agreement with the Town for improvements in Right of Way. 4. The applicant agrees to provide for maintenance of the pedestrian sidewalk area as well as the associated landscaping constructed under the building permit. 5. The west -end loading area shall be maintained and policed by the .applicant to see that it serves its intended function. The existing wood planter in this area shall be removed to allow maximum area for trucks. 6. The Town agrees to pay for the cost of removing the landscaped berm on the property in the area north of the "Ea Tour Plaza" if and when it decides to proceed with improvements as noted on the Urban Design Guild Plan. 7. The applicant agrees to work with the Town of Vail Fire Department in achieving the required work to the fire alarm system and exploring the possibility of doing all required fire code work (including retrofit requirements,) at the same time. . 8. The applicant agrees not,to remonstrate against a'special improvement district if and when formed for the Vail Village area. 9. A parking fee shall be paid based on additional commercial space. page three 10. A sign program for the Village Center Building shall be submitted and approved by the Design Review Board (staff will work with the architect and owner to meet this requirement). 11. Specifications for Yard`Hydrant 5randpipes shall be approved by the fire department. 12. Assess easement for Town of Vail access across portion indicated in PA 2 (area in front of La Tour Restaurant). 13. Need letter from utility company for using the 40' easement along the northeast portion of the property (#2 in easement report). 14. Need clarification of #5 easement from county. If you have further questions, please give me a call. Thnaks for your cooperation. Sincerely, • Kristan Prtiz Town Planner KP/rme CC:' Fred Hibberd 0 J DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA May 30, 1984 2:00 PM 1. Call meetingito order II. Roll call - determination of quorum III. Agenda 1. Cleveland residence: final review, Lot 3, blk 8, Intermountain 3-0 approval with changes made to landscaping, color, and screening to be reviewed.by staff. 2. Walker -Ray garage addition, lot 28, Vdil Meadows (Tabled) 3. Ogsbury residence: final review, lot 6, Resub Lot 14, blk 4, Bighorn 3rd Tabled by applicant 4. Village Center commercial addition storefront and landscape: Final review 2-0-1 approval - subject to meeting comments in staff letter May 21,1984. 5. Berkowitz addition: Final review, Lot 2, Vail Village 1st 3-0 approved per appl i°cation . 6. Sonnenalp, two menu boards 3-0 approval for board at front of building, 6 month approval for board adjacent to Bridge Street. 7. Bently-Eggers residence: conceptual review, Lot 18, blk 1, Vail Village 13th No vote taken. Final review to be at. June 6..th ,meeti:ng ., 8. Vail Mountain School addition and rockfall barrier, Lot 12, blk 2, V.Vil. 12 3-0 approved - contingent upon submittal to staff of stairway covering to prevent snow shedding problems. 9. Cyrano's deck remodel Tabled by applicant to June 6th. 10. Landmark Lodge exterior color change Staff approved color change to building L� MEMBERS PRESENT Jack Hunn Rick Baldwin Richard Matthews • ASSENT Will Trout Steve Caswell i - '9 • CJ 10WH of vRil 75 south frontage road vaii, coiorado 81657 (303)476-7000 office of community development June 6, 1984 Lynn Fritzlen P. 0. Box 57 Vail, CO 81658 Re: Cleveland Residence Dear Lynn: On May 30, 1984, the Design Review Board gave final approval to the Cleveland-Kjesbo Residence. Approval was given with the following conditions: 1. Two spruce trees are to be added to landscaping on "downhill side" of house. 2. Additional screening of underside of structure by extending foundation (or siding type of extension), six feet. 3. Color change of house from Concord Blue to Cabots Solid Color Stain #545. 4. Foundations and retaining walls are to be engineered and subsequently reviewed by Town of Vail engineer. Please call me with any questions you may have. �S�iinncerely, (` ,.: Si . Tom Braun TB/jh 4 ti Project Application Date �i Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: `Ac - (—�-Q Architect, Address and Phone: �fNt Legal Description: Lot Block Filing "��°"'�''�� Zone ��: Comments: Design Review Board Date�� Motion by: Q Seconded by: VC W6 APPROVAL summary: r1 DISAPPROVAL tai - Project Application Date AL 10 -Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: �Zo 1 k zone Legal Description: Lot— Block Filing r1n^ 7 Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by:��-- DISAPPROVAL AP VAL Project Application Date .Project Name: 141 i d Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: the prinlerylva�l IN 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (308) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA June 6th, 1984 2:OOPM 1. Call meeting to order H. Roll call determil,natl'on of quorum. III. Agenda items. office of community development 1. Cyrano's Deck and Remodel. Approved - 4-0 approved per application with follwing condi'ti-ons (to be reviewed by staff): 1. Utility meter to be screened. 2. Trim on new w4ndow to match existing. 3. Existing window trim to remain as i -s. 4. Color of stucco to be changed to a "less yellow'. 5. Flood lights to be replaced or screened. 6. Lattice painted to match stucco. 2. Bentley -Eggers Residence, Lot 18, Block I', Vail Village 13th. Approved 4-0 Approved per submitted 3. Bridgewater Remodel, Unit 6, Vail Rowhomes Approved 4-0 Approved per submittal. 4. Deck Addition, Lifthouse lodge Building. Tabled pending PEC approval for deck expansion. 5. First National Bank of Vail. Vail das Schone Shopping Center, Drive -up Bank Facility. Approved 3-0-1 Baldwin sustaining. Preliminary approval of plan with exception of stainless steel siding of structure (to be reviewed at 6/20/84 meeting. • • 6. Kalkus Hot Tub and Deck Enclosure, Lot 19, Block F, Vail Village 1st Filing. Approved 4-0 Approved per submitted. 7. Vail Mountain School, Landscape plan for soccer fields, Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th. Approved 4-0 Approved per submitted. 8. Ogsbury Residence Approved 3-0-1 - Matthews abstaining Approved per submitted with condition that sprinkler system is installed in home. IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Steve Caswell Jack Hunn MEMBERS ABSENT: Will Trout 75 south frontage road nail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Mi-. Robert Lee Myriam Corporation 405 Urban Street Suite 112 . Lakewood, Colorado, 80121 office of community development Oune 15, 1984 Dear Robert: After a mere two months the Dgsbury Residence has received final Design Review Board approval. Conditions of approval include that the home be sprinkled far fire protection and a site specific study addressing potential mud flow problems be approved by the town engineer. I have enclosed a copy of the administrative policy regarding this process. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. SSeerely, Thomas A. Braun Town Planner ENCLS: TAB/rme .ZA V ' Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Project Application a Date I Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Filing ,� /4t Zone Design Review Board Motion by: Wo 4 A - Seconded by: { y, - APPROVA Date DISAPPROVAL Y Town Planner Bate: ❑ Staff Approval the Pdnterylvail Project Application Date'' i . Project Name: DAVID &N TLF.Y01 �.. - £.G6t DO P LEY Project Description: APPRie y� �T + Dik PIX ��'%' FfL�• �Q= Contact Person and Phone o� JOG )Cf—ID l SKI `� `� 5S 1 2-7. -5$53 Owner, Address and Phone: i, 4t OHIO 9f—wtLy? 47(3�.- Oto Architect, Address and Phone: '- ox IS 7E bRECK E9 C0.. a oq:z Legal Description: Lot i Block Filing . p Zone Comments: ULADilt ��x Prr S 13i' -ylk FAU.SS Lit 6 F-X`TUl0R WALLS M&2ft- Design Review Board Motion by: C i^� - Seconded by: 41't4 -V APPROVAL 4(—() Date DISAPPROVAL lTown Planner Date: -0 Staff Approval the pdntegy vah Project Application Date A Lit 1 -- Project Name: ,OV T Project Description: ] Contact Person and Phone l Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Comments: • Design Review Board Date n • APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL , Zone Date: the printeryyvail . Project Application Date—'A�O Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: gyyo�Nv ¢.c. Legal Description: Lot Block Filing.Z^�►�"nEQ�� Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: �--� DISAPPROVAL APPROVAL summary: v.. -`tha prinlerylvail - • IN 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA June 20, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Ouorum III. Agenda Items: Site Visit #1 Motion -Trout 2nd -Caswell Hunn-Matthews A*ntion Site Visit #2 Motion - Bunn 2nd - Caswell office of community development 1. Golden Peak Base Facility Final Review Approved 3-0-2 Approval is for modified submittal (change of materials for planters along building from split face block --to stone and for tennis bleachers to be stucco). Excluded from approval is the terraced seating along the courts, the new Chalet Road tennis court, and the use of split -face blocks for retaining walls. Conditions of approval are that Vail Associates complete the necessary annex- ation process, final recording of subdivision plats, and agree to a revocable R. 0. W. permit for improvements in Town of Vail - R. 0. W. 2. Walker -Ray Garage Lot 28, Vail Meadows #1 Approved 5-0 Fence may be removed if applicant so desires Site Visit 3. Canada's Of Colorado - Exterior Alteration #7 Lazier Arcade Motion -Baldwin Approved 5•-0 2nd - Hunn Signage will be checked before building permit. Site Visit 4. Lodge at Vail.- Re -roofing #4 Approved 5-0 as submitted 0 Site Visit 5. #6 Motion - Baldwin 2nd -Caswell Lifthouse Lodge Re -painting Approved - 3-1-1 - as submitted Trout -Abstaining - Hunn against Site Visit 6. Sports Medicine Addition #5 Vail Valley Medical Building Motion - Trout Approved as submitted 5-0 2nd - Hunn Site Visit #3 Motion - Hunn 2nd - Caswell I. Vail Tee -Shirt Shop Exterior Alteration Rucksack Building Approved as submitted 5-0 Location of existing sign will be worked out with staff. 8. lst National Bank of Vail Vail Das Shone Shopping Center Motion - Matthews Application denied 3-1-1- application denied, re: Section 18.84.050 C. I. of 2nd - Hunn Design Review Guidelines - Caswell voted against the motion IV. New Business Baldwin - abstained V. 0'Id Business STAFF APPROVALS: Tivoli Deck Extension Northwoods Addition Wildflower Restaurant, MEMBERS PRESENT: Jack Hunn Rick Baldwin Richard Matthews Will Trout Steve Caswell i'emporary Landscape Plan. MEMBERS ABSENT: • 0 • • • 7� towo, of vat 75 south frontage road nail, colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development DATE: June 20, 1984 RE: Golden Peak Ski' Center office of community development The following i.s a list of concerns of the Design Review Board from your preliminary review of the Golden Peak Base Facility. It is'the feeling of the staff that Vail Associates has done a fine job.of.addressing these issues. This project is before you today for final Design Review Board Review. 1. Sign Proa ram Vail Associates has submitted a..complete list of signs indicating location, size and type of materials to be.used. This proposal is in compliance with the sign code. 2. Public Works Concerns of the Public Works Department has been addressed. 3. Snow Storage alon Chalet Road A great deal of time has been spent addressing this issue and we feel this proposal will result in a much improved situation than what has existed in the past. All Seasons Condominiums had asked that no snow from -plowing be dumped on their property. While we cannot assure All Seasons that no snow will be deposited on their property, impacts will be less than in the past. This' will be explained in more detail at the meeting:_.. 4. Control Gate The standard Town of Vail control gate will be used to.control access to Chalet Road based on requests of the Fire Department and Public Works. 5. Bike Path on Vail Valley Drive Material proposed to be used will be asphalt. Project Application p Date V�V►;V 1 I q roject Name: �rN►f Project Description: �«ev�� r� �tc� i) Contact Person and Phone VM HA Owner,.Address and Phone:? Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lott ; Comments: 0,11 Motion by: Seconded by:��� APPROVAL esign Review Board Project Application Date June 15, . 1984 Project Name: Lifthouse Lodge Color Change Project Description: New Solid Color Stains For All Siding & Exterior Trim Contact Person and Phone Jerry Meremonte , @ 476-305:1. Ruoff Partners hiArchitects Owner, Address and Phone: Bob Lazier - Lazier Commercial Properties P.O. Box 1325 - Vail, Co. 81658 476-1 Architect, Address and Phone: Ruoff Partnership Architects c. AIA 500 Lionshead Mall Vail -Co. 81657 476-305.1 Legal Description: Lot Pt. O13--, Block 1 Filing Vail Lionsh ad #1_- Zone - Comments: Design Review Board Date /2-4> Motion by: Seconded by: AP~ROV DISAPPROVAL Project Application Date June Project Name: Lodge at Vail Re -roof Project Description: I nstallation of R. 1. E new B. U. R . System Contact Person and Phone Jerry Meremonte @ 47.6-305.1 Ruoff Partnership Architects Owner, Address and Phone: Lodge at Vail 174 East Gore Creek Drive Vail Co. 81,657 476-5011 Architect, Address and Phone: Ruoff PartnershiArchitects .c AI 509 h al _ - 301 Legal Description: Lot _.A R F C Block 5C FilingVail Village First Zone ❑, Staff Approval the pr ffleryNBfl s Project Application Date G T Project Name:. � — J�/!'t Com nn - Project Description: fir. � "�f G7 7` ^�/ �J d oneb, d/n ��-�i2�i��"+ I Contact Person and Phone GAacle,s 6'- AQrn Aecd �Z767 4/712 - - Owner, Address and Phone: �� ^'t O fI �I Rol dq GG • -- X76- G G E® O q� Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot R� Block Filing ra,ilcr/� /„��- Zone Town.Planner Date Legal Description: Lot ,Block filing. .01117, 141m, i Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Project Application Date f/c Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: /�q se!57 Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL 4-74 v Block Filing 9 r�+ 2 Zone �-- Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval lhepdMerylvall fowl 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JULY 5, 1984 2:00PM 1. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Cali - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: Site Visits 1. Higbie Residence remodel and addition #4 Mill Creels Circle approved 5-0 approved per submittal #13 Japproved 5-0 #12 I approved 5-0 AN 3 approved 5-0 2. Bartlett -Irish landscape plan Potato Patch approved per application office of community development 3. SDD #13 - 4 unit residential project Vail Das Shone approved per application with conditions 1. railing added to upper parking area 2. wood removed from corner retaining wall 3. rough grading to be done after foundations are in 4. Ramshorn Exterior Alteration Village approved per application Site Visit #1 5. Tilkemeier - Zadeth Residence Addition Bighorn conceptual review, no vote taken #9 6. Shelsta Residence Addition Matterhorn, approved 5-0 approved with conditions W#6 7. Purcell's Deck Fxpanston Lionshead ►pproved 5-0 approved per submittal with condition that trees be protected during construction #7 8. Westwind Pool Lionshead Epproved 5-0 approved per submittal #8 9. Chart House Sign Appeal Lionshead approved 3-2 motion for denial #2 10. Kempf Residence Satellite Receiver Dish 0olfcourse tabled by applicant to July 19th Site Visit 11. Valentino's Deck landscape Plan #5 Village conceptual approval - final review to be done by staff #10 12. Ogilby Residence Addition Intermountain approved 4-0--1 approved per submittal Baldwin abstaining #11 13. approved 4-0-1 Baldwin abstaining 1st National Bank of Vail -- Drive -up Facility Vail das Shone approved per submittal IV. New Business V. Old Business STAFF APPROVALS Lionshead Mall - Temporary Signs Sherr Residence window Re -paint of Park Meadows Re -paint of Columbine Condominiums Summers Residence roof change Vail T-shirt Company Sign Sweater Shop of Vail Sign Vail Mercantile Sign MEMBERS PRESENT all present MEMBERS ABSENT TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 29, 1984 SUBJECT: SDD #13 BACKGROUND OF REQUEST This request went through the Planning and Environmental Commission for a rezoning from Primary/Secondary to Special Development District. This was done to solve access problems to Lot 9. The SDD zoning has allowed the designer to site the three homes on these lots while disregarding the internal lot lines. PEC approved this request by a 4-0-1 vote. STAFF RECOMMENDATION While the staff did not originally recommend approval of this proposal, we support the project before you today. We feel the applicant has done a fine job of locating. these structures on the site. The project has been reviewed by all the appropriate T.O.V. departments and has received their conditional approval. 0 ri 1W TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 23, 1984 SUBJECT: A request for a minor subdivision to abandon internal lot lines of three lots and rezone the property from Primary/Secondary to Special Development District #13. The lots involved in the request are i, 8, 9, Block H, Vail das Schone Filing No. 2. Applicant: W & W Associates, Ltd 01. REZONING REQUEST Background of this Proposal These lots were subdivided by Eaglje County and zoned Primary/Secondary by the Town of Vail after annexation. It is the applicant's objective to develop four residential units on the site (all three lots are under single ownership). Rezoning to an SDD is necessary to gain access to Lot 9. This lot is a "flag lot" with approximately a 20% slope where the lot accesses to Garmish Drive. This slope makes access virtually impossible, leaving Lot 9 essentially undevelop- able. The proposed SDD and minor subdivision would allow for flexibility in the development of the site, while maintaining the same densities as the adjacent properties in the neighborhood. The staff has been working with the applicant to develop a solution for accessing Lot 9. The SDD zoning and minor subdivision will allow for the site planning of the three lots as a whole. This will substantially improve the impact of development on the site by reducing the number and severity of cuts for driveways. Elimination of internal lot lines will also allow for flexibility in siting structures on the lot(s). One aspect of this application that should be noted is how this proposal could impact Lot 10. Located directly to the north of Lot 9, Lot 10 is also a "flag lot" with similar access problems. The staff encouraged the applicant to incorporate Lot 10 into this proposal. Contact was made between the two parties, but no agree- 1:: ment was made to include°Lot 10 in this SDD. If approved, this SDD would eliminate one access possibility to Lot 10. .Development Potential of the Proposed SDD The following table illustrates the development potential of the individual lots and development of the site as proposed under this application: w&W -2-- 5/23/84 4fExisting Develo meat Potential of lots 7, 8, 9 Lot Zane Size Allowable GREA Allowable Conditional Total 7 P/S 10,890 sf 2,723 sf Units Units Units 8 P/S 11,326 sf 2,831 sf 1 1 1 1 2 9 P/S 22,218 sf 4,472 sf 2 2 - 2 44,432 sf 10,026 sf _ 4 2 6 * Because lots 7 and 8 are less than 15,000 square feet, secondary units would be conditional based upon further review as required by Section 18.13.080 of the zoning code. This review is intended to insure that a lot of this size has the capacity to handle a secondary unit. Development Proposed for SDD #13 # of„Units- GREA Unit 1 1 2,800 sf Unit 2-3 2 3,500 sf (2,100 sf primary, 1400 sf secondary) Unit 4 1 2,700 Totals 4 units 8,400 sf GRFA The total number of allowable units for this site is four. This number could be as high as 6 if the two employee units were to be included. Allowable GREA on the three lots is 10,026 square feet, while 8,4 proposed. 00 square feet are DESIGN STANDARDS FOR AN SDD The development plan for an SDD requires applicable design standards to be met. The following is a summary of this proposal with respect to the nine criteria: A. Buffer Zones A buffer zone is required for any SDD that is adjacent to any low-density residential use. Since the density and use of this proposal is the same as surrounding development, a buffer zone is not required. 1-0 i SDD 13 -3- 5/23/84 B. Circulation System Public Works and the Fire Department have reviewed the internal vehicular circulation of this proposal and have approved the design. C. Functional Open Space In reviewing this site plan, the staff feels the applicant has done a good job of optimizing views and preserving natural open spaces when possible. D. Variety of Housing Types Potential development on this site could allow for up to 6 units (2 of which would be employee units). At one time these employee units were a part of this proposal, but were subsequently eliminated by the applicant. The staff was disappointed to see this change in the development plan as it eliminated a key variety of housing type. E. Privacy Not applicable to this scale of development. F. Pedestrian Traffic Not applicable to this scale of development. G. Building Type Density, siting, and bulk of the proposed structures are compatible with surrounding development. H. Building Design This will be reviewed at the DRB level if this proposal is approved. I. Landscaping of Total Sites While there are a number of retaining walls on the site, they are for the most part adequately landscaped. Other landscaping on the site appears sufficient and will also be reviewed by the DRB if this proposal is approved. i 14 SDD 13 -4- 5/23/84 Permitted, Conditional, and Accessor Uses The uses in an SDD are those permitted in the zone district in which it is located. In this case, uses would be limited to those in the Primary/Secondary zone. 18.13,020 Permitted uses The following uses shall be permitted: A. Single-family dwellings B. Two-family residential dwellings 18.13.030 Conditional uses The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a conditional use permit. A. Public utility and public service uses B. Public buildings, ground and facilities C. Public or private schools D. Public park and recreation facilities E. Ski lifts and tows 18.13.040 Accessory uses The following accessory uses shall be permitted: A. Private greenhouses, toolsheds, playhouses, garages or carports, swimming pools, patios, and recreation facilities customarily incidental to single- family and two-family residential uses; B. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit. C. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. Other Issues Concerning This Application The applicant has gone through a lengthy process to insure that the Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation District will be able to service this site with water. While this problem appears to have been mitigated, any approval given should be conditional on a letter from the District insuring adequate water pressure will be available and meet the requirements of'the Vail Fire Department. The Fire Department has reviewed and approved.the development plan but will not give its final approval unless the above letter is submitted. Said letter should be in our office by June 1, 1984. STAFF RECOMMENDATION With one exception, the staff is generally pleased with this submittal. The site planning and design of this project is much improved with the flexibility afforded by the SDD zoning. This would not be possible if the lots were developed individually. However, the staff is discouraged by the elimination of the two employee housing units that were once an element of this proposal. Employee SDD 13 -5- 5/23/84 housing has been a long standing issue in this community and it has been a priority of this department to encourage them whenever possible. The Vail Community Action Plan also notes the importance of meeting the needs of employee housing. A county -wide employee housing survey's initial results indicate there is a preference for this type of employee unit as opposed to a "Valli Hi" type of facility (final results of the survey should be available in July). This proposal has an opportunity to add two employee units to the community, and that opportunity is not being taken. Because of this, our recommendation of this request is denial. Our opinion is that the applicants are asking for everything they want without giving the community the benefit of the employee housing. II. MINOR SUBDIVISION! Description of Request This application is required as a part of the rezoning request. This minor subdivision would abandon the internal lot lines of lots 7, 8, and 9. These three lots would then be considered as one lot, or SDD #13 if approved. (De- velopment potential of the lots both individually and collectively have been outlined elsewhere in this memo). Criteria Evaluation 40 17-16. 110 PEC Review Criteria [7 The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to show that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and other pertinent regulations that the PEC deems applicable. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations made b y ublic utility companies and other agencies consulted under 17.16.090. The gPEC �shall review the application and consider its appropriateness in regard to Town of Vail policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, environmental inte grity and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Density The proposed SDD includes less overall GRFA than is allowed on the three lots when considered collectively. This is a positive factor in considering the overall bulk and mass of structures on the site. While up to six units could Possibly be built on the site, this application is proposing only 4 units. The staff would prefer a density of 6 units, 2 being restricted employee units. Site Plan Abandoning these lot lines allows for greater flexibility in site designing for these lots. The proposed site plan has taken advantage of this, resulting in an improved appearance on the lot compared to developing the lots individually. SDD 13 -6- 5/23/84 Compatibility With Surrounding__Properties E Density on these three lots will not be greater than those on surrounding lots. This proposal would be very compatible within its neighborhood. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Because the minor subdivision goes hand-in-hand with the SDD proposal; we recommend denial. We feel the applicant should be proposing a density which includes two employee units. i (P it fowl 75 south frontage road vall, coforado 81657 (303) 476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Department of Communfty Development SUBJECT: Purcell's Deck Expansion DATE: June 29, 1984 office of community development Back ound of this: Proposal As required by zoning, this proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their June 25th meeting. The Planning and Environmental Commi'ssi,on approved this proposal by a 5-0-1 vote. Staff recommendation of this proposal was for approval (see attached memo). Relationship to the Li-onshead Urban Design Guide Plan This proposal is i,n compliance with the Design Plan with. respect to sub -urea concept #18. it is also i,n complaince with. Design Consider- ations concerning decks and patios. Staff Recommendation Staff is supporting this proposal with the condition that the two existing tress remain. Planning and Environmental Commi'sssi'on has passed on this concern to the Design Review Board for your review. 9 :7 fowl 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Kristan Pritz SUBJECT: Chart House Sign Appeal DATE: June 28, 1984 office of community development The Chart House is requesting to place a sign stating ''chart House Restaurant Parking after 5:00 PM." at the parking lot entrance off . of Lionshead Place. The parking lot is located behind the Landmark Condominiums. The sign would be made of plastic with a wood backing and is 3 square feet in size. The applicant has received approval from Vail Associates to put up the sign. Staff denied this request because it was felt that it would be unfair to the other restaurants and shops located in the Lionhead Mall. it would be unfair to allow one business to indicate available park- ing and not allow the other businesses the same parking privilege. We suggested that a. ign� statVng. "L:ionshead: Paft n.�^afite. 5;00P erected instead. It was felt.that this sign would benefit all the merchants. The Chart House disagrees as they feel that their business is particularly difficult to see because of the mall construction. In addition, the Chart House has placed:an-indentif cat on"sign oh'_th.e north side of the Landmark Condominium Building. Staff approved this sign. The Town of Vail has also constructed two temporary signs for the restaurant during mall construction. One sign is located near the entrance of Cabbages and Kings and the other sign is located near the old staircase on the east side of the restaurant. Staff feels that the Chart House's three signs are more than adequate to alleviate the inconvenience to customers due to the Lionshead Mall Construction. For these reasons, staff has denied the request for the additional Chart House parking sign. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to add a dining deck to the south side of Purcell's Restaurant in the Lifthouse Lodge. Applicant: John. Purcell DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE This proposal would convert an existing "green space" area to a patio that would be used by patrons of Purcell's Restaurant. The proposed patio expansion would be done to match the existing patio on the other side of Purcell's entrance. The use of the patio would be for the service of food and drink. Hours of operation for the deck would be consistent with the hours of the restaurant. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit.based upon the following factors: Consideration of Factors Relationship and impact of the use ondevelopment meat objectives of the Town. This use is consistent with the commercial activity found in the Lionshead area. This proposal will not create any significant impacts to Lionshead. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. No effect on any of the above. Effect upon traffic with particular re pedestrian safet and convenience, tra erence to congestion, automotive and fic flow and control, access, mane"- yerab7lity, and removal of ;now from the street and parkin2 areas. If the deck is to used in the winter, snow removal could present a problem. It will be the responsibility of the restaurant operators to ensure that snow is not removed onto public right-of-ways. C, Purcell Deck -2- 6/20/84 ' Effect u on the character of the area in which the ProPosed use is to be located, +� inc udin the scale and bu k of the ro osed use in re atlon to surroun in uses. ,This proposal is not in conflict with existingscale and should be noted that this proposal would resut in a loss bofkone ofof oLiansheadZs "green" areas. ,,.Relationshin of Pro osed use to Vail's Community Action Plan. Not applicable. Rela-lonshi to Lionshead Urban Desi n Guide Plan. This proposal is relative to Sub -Area Concept #18 of the Guide Plan: 18. Commercial expansion (1 story) to emphasize pedestrian level. Patio area enlarged slightly for additional dining space (a sun pocket area), and wider, inviting steps also sitting function. This sub -area concept calls for a "slight" enlargement of the patio area. This Proposal would convert the entire area to a patio and dining use. While this proposal would remove existing green space, the two trees on the site will remain. The staff regards these trees as a key element of this proposal as well as a vital element of Lionshead. As long as these trees remain, this proposal is consistent with the Guide Plan. FINDINGS The Community Development Department recommends that the conditional use permit be approved based on the following findings; That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of this ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, .or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable provisions of this ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommendation for this proposal is approval. The two main reasons ` for this recommendation are that the use is consistent with activities in Lionshead, and the Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan calls for this type of expansion. One condition of approval we would recommend is that the two existing trees rem are protected during construction. ain and 0 e LIONSHEAD CENTER MALL 10 Planting islands relocated to improve store accessibility and to -expand dual mall passage for peak skier crowds. 11 Commercial expansion (Y storey) to increase pedestrian scale of mall, and improve shade -zone facades and 12 Opportunity exists far expansion of buiidinas, arcades, awnings,' etc. to improve scale, shelter, appearance of commercial facades. ._ CLOCKTO WER SQUARE 13 Ticket plaza expanded for skier queuing, snow removal, a through Passage. In summer, portable planters restore color, small scale. 14 Connecting ramp to make the entire mall accessible to.emergency and utility vehicles, as well as easy barrier -free access for pedestrians. 15 Central planting island with popcorn wagon reconfigured to give more uniform circulation and permit free movement on all sides. 16 Commercial expansion (1 storey)'to establish pedestrian scale . beneath building mass. Summer season use of public r.o.w. by permit for dining patio. Furnishings: to be removed for winter access, snow removal, and general appearance. 17 Planting to screen non-commercial areas and make visual green link between plazas. 18 Commercial expansion (1 storey) to emphasize pedestrian level. Patio arca enlarged slightly for additional dining space ( a sun -pocket area), and wider, inviting steps also sitting function GONDOLA PLAZA 19 Commercial expansion ( i storey),and ground floor office replaced by commercial, to improve pedestrain scale, accessibility, and create strong activity 'generator for south side of plaza.- currently a snow collector. Light tree screening either portable or in grade -level tree grates for snow removal and easy access. yp Gondola building ramp, a second access to the Gondola to distri- bute foot traffic, and draw visitors, through other areas of mall. 21 Tall sculpture feature at highest -visibility point as viewed from either end of the mall. Y2 Existing mature vegetation preserved for green, color, and scale. Supplement with portable summer -time planters for additional color and more intimate scale for plaza. '�'�+r.rw'p.r�"'�!'�i.�-t"Cw�rA� ''.. " I�F'A�•+NkY•t�v��!1ti��"a�� -_...r.�,�':7` "c 1.r ,;tom^ „� _ tf ". iS._.,,• 24 f- k: r1 „CN �Xi:;i6M, �� r ��,,,,�� ,�% }ii.'�',� i i � hl��Il1 ��S��1i? 1��~'�1 } e ,may` t ! ���p+'��i,`L�"Si:�C•v 'Flr�;r:rC:'I!J /.;/[.i�•2,l I i i:'.Y IIOTA. •� !z't33Ht.., ' ! - .A_ 1'.I 4' •4 } i.ry "Sir f, ..' -- i � .. }'J' '�'..R F F.•.. ''"- ( I i1 W' LION k�7ii�1. s ,• ,FAF�� �� =,'r r-f�w-aw. - - 's` i -j ��'� �.'ri�.�,a,4�. g :G I �,} f �+.,.'.�..,. _ 1 � -.� ' I ."'�'F,�K a +ii' � ^ t l i Sr r � r �• $ n�' ! b � •J � .. ¢• _ ,.'% t, f'l ' _ _ 'j�, r ,P`'f''� � f'""�,J'"'�.!"".j, `l:.trr 's rr„i^-=. rl 4-�:4``*.� 4 �--•-(' t,�y 1 1• r- ' u' � I rS Est�a�l+�+ - � � � ^t:'v"r•y-,� �. �'�. �:.•••'-+ �' r ��_i��_.ei�: 2'�(-� �,. �' 1( I.I i+.+:. .'Y'i�..`�' 1.; r>.`t rI�lS rr,[�III I;L; --�,-a til '. 1 'S""Yw•�.,«._'�S„ _ S: � �rr�wvi-`.•..--.•}r^'_ rj'j I"T, �r:,,''y�•�. rr. Er C7 is y}�3 : t I rr 7 •3•::-.� r. F - { •' r' f Trl,l� I r, i.. ki' +T LFII •�t 11..1 t{ jl1��s 't• } _"t" f -+• I�C�I�'.;Il.il`" {,{,hl'r .d. {lIIlI{iti'3rilr� <'- ,• '�x-` r r.: F.sstlt l3'ti't)tlf ! `�• I r t1� 1 l{ f�1�.SL.Qt�i�ir,' r 1.1` '•jk 1 S �F'. Ilafi 1. .y;` .Y :: - -�Y Ili!+:y/7 �•1„1'•I,1 tfr lr }Ist 1�>tii 1 .V t� ,R r x j li`-! �a {PIES r + Y � ` �� �*' --- .. 11�!:Yi�'y� t♦�a"'„��' 11. i IIy` �k�•'+ ►' f�l-�i•t, j � <.:, ►�i"4: S-' r rilr,y :"tom it • - i'„r.d„��•r s�r1 .*..r. y �•t 'S•.,•il 1,1 wti+'s f A. +� II.� ,t 1 ;yl ,r r.,lr '1 F t ts^~1•��•\i�i r •� r .- .'__� 1�' h v'. �r►q•1�=.1 ..r "r`Ty✓t 3_ii �rt;\• ti I I ` , [ r t t r,; ' c ���..-,.�,....' . �1" �� .— � - ........�'r" *.,.• J•" $ 1tG, : _. + I:: rI :i• ';1teFE.� �►l.fi.i.x.3 *r�Csti„i�'_='rye �i �4 "" �`y` `•'jr r,,.�,f � i -i r 4•c �f0 F�, l - '; •N 4�^.+� yr �•-�. !il r.. -}r +' •!•_.!. -�w{r' r• .-.+...� J7+.�. _•...r. ii'•><i4-`^�i .•.�._..wT i t 1 Y+.� �r'--`I` _5�� �; l�ey..�-,�N 'r I•. r 1 , I - - ... `+"•'++ �"i.'^ rraf YM•ry • L •' + . �.-.. �. r'J4 i �P r r•�C j,; + «<S«.'s� �. � . 4f.i, 11 1Is' • ii,•.1''A R..i,X,•r-;tJF,,c,�,l�j `�� '�-N` �{CL'� � '� �.._. ��`� .�:J.i"t�• "7• .�..�.•..�... +.sbf.0rr� � z �;�t I • �i r.'�:� c:. -, �, [�} � � '} ..-.. " ± ��...... �'-, 1.. 17w5`��y +,Y •r, � , � r'�'fF'�� ytwai...t_• rl�TI - 'f }-t' F1 1 �'�� ,.�„+- •,ll� .: � � - . �k "�".S .t) � - �'i~7� 7�� "'•r' 1,-� �+tt{'.:+uC ..i•xw�,F�:e .t ir•+}.�,# jFf!i" ,Z ~.--...-_. -I L,7 sati.l ° •.e4wel r' !Z'it r 3 + rr.l I wa .'I•..:� klj r } - .l � #, •'• .�„•,r�rr�.�....•�~�.. uv i' �i 1�j:i l.a `�ld.i ,t" .,� I 1 ,tr:r 'Y.�a �+:: cy .r'. _ .-.T _-f! - f I ''S I ,�f ��i, ���`y;�y, li.{ it IFIFr !I?���4•ri '+ �.! > S r > r '- �-.] •--.-...•., � r _ - I+ I r., I �1 I r r..� .� } 1 t 1 � yr I : ' �„�, t..{ r f..ti yx Jt .-J! -. .rte• •" M I r. Ir ''3 11 i I §: I I. I :Ir ,t. ��r •� I .` „-t _ x -'.t a\ '+• 7�'4 i •'• •`►--�4��'-'i --.,'O+I.Y,�iw,�J�� � �r ��iy "1jy�Y F q '!!v -t •Y 1 it i { lil i } 1,111 LI 1 y �YSi��r-wI' 1 II 1 IF ! I 1 1rr;yyit 13'3�rriil4 ! IFk r 1�; -^i.� '�" ., •- -0. t ' aw r.... �,+�`�y� t t' 1 At r' I - .`..�.,`••r—.r•'i ! f�•"� _ '-+_ t, %..v r '•'rai T -_ � tilj-. ��-Si r.'•y \slr.lrl .atr+fin i._. 1- ~+n�'ML �e.A 14 }=F ' +� � •� r ' { 4 _ ren '• 1� ?�, '.- �rf t';ix�' l Y w 1'N r ti -r r. i ^e- LU J'.. • 1{I.. '�' rl i l `I -G�--� rl+� . I 40- i l fill sties { , f . [ i 't!,• ` ,j�"`„'y,• lx,- ;t t';li y I ?.4� y. LL -.T!- oY {• iIFi t i - t I r•��:1! ,� '7' 11rr.'t.l �Y[, c�,r 1 S�_ ?1 � �1' r � r,,•f' I- IF3i{(1` tF I "-•� - F ,II / 1 i rills r� e;•F�.ss- •�: •4.• I •t[ i��..,,.•y ,7S' ,;� s � x�_ IIr1f�k (! �' [ I • rli i ltl�rts �! ! H t. j.r �••-'f� ,� - _y�•. r..' •. �47 �' ..-� i .' 1'+ ..� 1 II'fll FS'E r{ [II{E , 'F',�1� ti.r�=134'.1 �il.�tll Ott �;•.'4.,.-� ry.{ . _ �,1 .... .� ;>.• -(�� a 1 TICKET, /tet` T !I�,r 1y7�I tura is'IIII 1 �i� 1�11�ii�sxLei•rr�++�l'T•. ..�F.�hr �w{'��'�,. • .. ti •.� .. {I 1ICKE 1 III iF ti " -III ♦� �;,y} I �tyl irl 1', i 1 'lil'i �f'1r►J'J J Yti` �i' ;•.7!'� a � 1 I '.f WL.}v F,t:r:: ! >•. r t 1-lrt-15' 1 J}. �•�r'�•l,3 r r t •rw i ! .i t'1 + rr, ' .•..�� j� a�'},+,F BOO f i k 1`e r!A . - ''` ! 't ► ;[�K•� .* t �' ill7'r.'i. - r411'S't ' , r II Slil. I"11 r1 I,�- �, I{f i F 71 ,t ..cr . '+�:.._ I I'«�j +`� �''• ' !•.y� k/ ,-r `+ r' 1 '; 11 ti i•''t'itt. II•II<'�ri•F, �:�•�r r-. rr n� :f s.''�"''�•71��'�+wt�hi..� i. 'tW fa L�*�1 .7� i'i'�F�Tr:�r �i�11 Ft(I iftfS r �y:..W 1.) TT J'� '41 jar ! 1 .r.� ' r' •- I!�J sr 17.i'1 irttFll,tlr�,t r' f t•�ry A •�• . r.i. Ohl},yt•�. t -+VFY4Va.!{- i - •�..�'� r Irl r?h, �•' ,i f h`l•r �..rt 1F 1j • �` •••i'i li,,r +e-11'�Y���tt**��1 �1F11 Ir;•iIp Ill q,) 1!+ - / � (�'r•� 1~ 1 `' + Irl•1' 1 F I.1�1'Nl., 3 I I I'� `r,o1:.•i �•ji Y r,141f�+�hrr+; +�J -c; t � '=tl r ;i'F; Ii lirY�'TM�..�••� .y a.art. r.Ir`;1!1.,,1•. a.. :J. 'SYt'�4? i �� ,� •b' (ka'.^ �t r , IIi�. II. .+,�`j.l,,ctlrT•, �.+ f �ti.... / LL JJjjh 1 .. i3ih 't'* "l ' ; tri• YY .� i I --r I Ir i/ '.R �Y �` � ���r• . f i'•IrY \�••-� � • •' I � r � �Vy ',� �,� w� /rM.�; r\ Tw.r• �. `i yrj 1l�.' `, ' _ .P r:Y ... -fi.. !' rp'!'' ..,1�^.,�VIn.,.fi�-='Jj•lyj - -, - !`1 .7 • �X— SIGN APPLICATION Application Number Fee Paid Name of Project 1 QV Name of Person Submitting Phone Location of Project F -n an Description of Project UJ6Ln� �c SCgY� {�. :iit-r'1 r1AA.4- 14AIItP eiPe-, t& (AA t' o&r k(r a, 15, aJJ&L(0L6 P— 1>1 The following information is required for submittal by the applicant to the Design Review Board before a final approval can be given. Sign submittal fee is $20.00. A. Sign Material B. Description of Sign p 1!�O,rSe-- rkci G� t- 5 �'•� • C. Size of Sign D. Comments is ��y r4 wdJ fo W -ayme 61 w E� k-CQ� ��- t- L l t4 4h J MATERIALS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION 1. Site Plan ho4� 2. Drawings sing exact location _ 3. Photographs showing proposed location 4. Actual sign 5. Colored scale drawing 5. Photograph of sign 7• off -f-of re-11111-e,S/6 % VA Sign Administrator Approved for DRB Submittal Disapproved for DRB Submittal a-�- a. C( WAZ&k CQ tue ; 4- i~S C", d o m I z4- Sign Administrator ctp-oj UJ b.0 S I ru4s- w &A dZIC-n ., ! y ems' re–S'i'c. Lv arr J ew S o E.'r I�e�i t �-� 6 -r -- 10 10 9 aProject Name:U�� Pro-ect Description• Project Application UP Date Contact Person and Phone ( L-Ve't&L- .0 --�'Ovw VJ�F� Architect, Address and Phone: — - d Legal Description: Lot Block Filing ���� � S C Zone Comments: 0 Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL 4ZO'4f�) 0 C( '/ T wn Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: the prlMsrylvall Project Application Date June 15 1984 •Project Name: Bartlit/ Irish Driveway Chan e Project Description: extend approved drive to north to second curb cut Contact Person and Phone Henr Pratt 476-303$ Owner, Address and Phone: Fred Ba rtlit and Dave Irish R.0- B0 io 81657 476-1797 (Idgh) Architect, Address and Phone: Bri ner Scott Architects 143 East Meadow Drive Vail, ColoradO 4Z6-3038 Legal Description: Lot _1$ _ _, Block t=iling Vail-pntatn Patch._ , Zone Comments: Motion by: _— �—/�-. UY) h Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: 0 ' v Town Planner Date: Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval the printerylvall. Project .Name: t u� Project Description: To Project App iication 4 Contact Person and Phone + s 14' 'r Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: !� Project Application Date Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and PhoneI Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Filing Design Review Board Date Motion by: — Seconded by: c"o,"A APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Zone Town r r ❑ Staff Approval Date: KI Project Application Date 1'UI" Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: ' f Legal Description: Lot o k Filing Zone hV 1 ' Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: Yn T own Planner Date: �� • 7 ❑ Staff Approval 0 Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Person Project Application rata II v Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot LlBlock , Filing I)JOz4A Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: <:�APP,tHOVAL DISAPPROVAL Town Planner Date: El Staff Approval Project Application Date Project Name: 1 Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot A. Block , Piling Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: VIA - Town Planner Date: Design Review Board Date i ti DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval , Zone Project Name: Project Description: v P It-QA;n'A Contact Person and Phone Project Application Date e Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: ,.V%%', Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Filing r , Zone Design Review Board S Date Motion by: 1i M Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL " t' Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval the prinkerylvail Project Application Project Name: _ L' Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Date Filing , Zone Design Review Board Date Motion by: `��` Seconded by: �'D 4 PVAL DISAPPROVAL —0 Summary: vuvv Town Pla ner ❑ Staff Approval Date: Project Name:ul Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Project Application Date N Filing Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL — DISAPPROVAL , Zone Summary: .3 6 l 'Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date $ 40 .Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone i� Owner, Address and Phone: T �3 A�QF � c — n- f- r- _ _ .- c --N I "A—I NArr4sc v— Architect, Address and Phone: Zone Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Comments: Qx rr. Motion by: Seconded by: Design Review Board Date APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL '(nLS or Wwrane o Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval town of voil 75 south frontage road veil, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JULY 18, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call meeting to order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: 1. Tilkemeir - Zadeh Residence Addition 5016 W. Main Gore Drive - Bighorn Motion - Hunn Second - Baldwin -08 Approved 4•-0. Approved w"i:th_ ad..dttiuAl landscaping Site Visit #3 2. Childrens Corner Signe, Vail Village Motion - Hunn Second R Caswell Approved 4-0 Approved per subCRi Ml Site Visit #5 3. Gondola Building Expansion Lionshead Motion R Bal dwi;n. Second Hunn Approved 2-0.--2 (Nunn, M4tthews; abstained) Preliminary" Approval Visit 2 4. Price Addition Lot 37 Block 7 Vail Village 1st - Fores.t Road Motion - HunnSecond Caswell. pproved 3-0-1 (Matthews abstaining) ved with condlti.ons office of community development Ste Visit #1 5. Ramshorn Lodge Landscape Plan Vail Village Tabled by applicant Site Visit 6. Casino Building Exterior Alteration #4 Vail Village -- Helga's of Vail • Motion -- Hunn Second - Baldwin Approved - 4-0 Approval with conditions IV. New Business V. Old Business Staff Approvals Lodge Promenade - Cornecopia Sign DeLong Residence - re -roof Lifthouse River rock for roof instead of red gravel Skul Haus - color change Wright Residence Deck addition Vail Golf Course Townhomes - change in window design CMC Summer Vail Art Auction Banner 7/27 to 8/5 Beckley Deck Addition Shelsta Addition - landscape plan Jerry Ford Tou.rna(Ment. banner Members Present: Steve Caswell Jack Hunn Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Members Absent: Howard Rapson Project Application Date • Project Name: -- - Sl1 to _ .1 kKA/Ed1u"." Project Description: 1 Contact Person and PhoneP LJ Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing �� Zone Comments: Design Review Board Motion by: Cly 0 Seconded by: ce�-'A APPROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL Town 15idnner ❑ Staff Approval Date: Project Application % Date Project Name: -x-10 —, Project Description: ,6.bb1 +101-4� Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: �� `L ��1� ��' `✓�� Architect, Address and Phone: `''�� Y '' 4 �' L }0 Legal Description: Lot 21 Block Filing _ Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Project Application Date— � %�. �4 Project Name: Project Description: LCli-C i> Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: M 0 L� I -�- Legal Description: Lot Block . �` Filing � __ Zone Comments: <2fEC22IZiE�Z, C' =-1,.tZ _ 4J—, lC�J;-j„IdA re" . 1 Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL I nb&, ) n Date Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Project Application As Project Name: Project Description: AXA� * d Aeet ",l Date Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address p(nd Phone: Architect, AddressPhone Legal Description: Lot Block , Filing , Zone Comments: J Kr_ialN J Motion by: , V - Seconded by: t'`f i APPROVAL D Design Review Board Date g V DISAPPROVAL Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date& 0 Project Name: Contact Person and Phone 1 i 1 /' i /t--- � U rr► �Crll�►�. � Owner, .. Phone: IF -224E Mrk!� ra.IUVII 45� mil . Sr Legal Description: Lot A Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Design Review Board J Date DISAPPROVAL Y , Town Planner Cf i Date: ❑ Staff Approval 0 Project Name: Project Application Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Block Filing Design Review Board Date I�ir=.t l�l�Trl�lfl , Zone Summary: - -- - Tow Planner L Date: 11 ❑ Staff Approval ftNProlect Name: ;I Project Application Date .1 Project Description: 1 �1-3���TtC� VL 4 L.bV1d cti•c ��•�� n 137 S 0 Contact Person and Phone �%euclI-t 7 La _ to A - Owner, Address and Phone: a4 V. C.1h Pu i 2 34 Z C, k tip t C& 1+ Architect, Address and Phone: co cQ c1r �. h rr t � ce,4- et G °� 1; . at v �r - k Legal Description: Lot t VL6Bloc �: I "-,filing Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone Town Planner 0 Staff Approval Date: ._—�_ *roject Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Project Application 0 Filing Date Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Zone Town Planner Date: aft Approval fowl 75 south frontage road vaii, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 RESIGN REUEW BOARD AGENDA. AUGUST 1: 1984 2.,,QQPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - d.e.termi;nation of quorum III. Agenda Items; office of community development Site Visits #7 1. Charli.es T-shirt shop awning and sign Montaneros Rui,ldi:ng Motion - Steve Caswell Preliminary Approval Second - Jack Hunn Approved - 5-0 2. Potato Patch. Club Sign Program Potato Patch Motion - Jack Hunn Approved as submitted Second - Howard Rapson Approved - 5-0 #3 3.. Saunders Residence AddltiQn Bighorn Motion - Steve Caswell Approved as submitted Second - Howard Rapson Approved 5-0 #2 4. Sweti,sh Residence_ Qarage Addition ("Fi,na.l ) Vail Village 11th Motion - Jack Hunn Approved as submitted Second - Rick Baldwin Approved - 5-0 Visit 5. Pirog Residence Glen Lyon Motion -- Jack H.unn Second - Steve Caswell Approved , 3-1 R ck.Baldw$n opposed Richard Matthews abstained Prel imi nary. a.pprova.l #6 6. Gore Range Properties - Entrance remodel Vail 21 Building Lionshead Motion - Steve Caswell Approved as submitted with conditions. Second Howard Rapson Approved 3-2 Rick Baldwin. opposed Howard Rapson - opposed. #4 7. Employee cafeteria addition Lodge at Vail - Village Motion - Steve. Caswell Approval contingent upon landscape screening Second - Howard Rapson around relocated utility boxes, Final Approved 5-0 landscaping to be approved at Staff level. #5. 8. Timberline Properties Entry Remodel A & Q Building Village Motion R Jack Hunn Approved with contingencies Second.. Steve Caswell Approved 5-0 IV. New Business V. Old Business. STAFF APPROVALS: Concert Hall Plaza Bart & Yetils Restaurant The Valley Conod entry way Lionshead Center Telemark Retaining Wall Gni Lyon Office Addition - balcony addition to Gordon Piercers Office Mt7n.�ERS PRESENT: STAFF MEMBERS MEMBERS ABSENT; Steve Caswell Rick Baldwin Kristan Pritz Jack Hunn Richard Matthews Thomas Braun Howard Rapson • Project Application k Project Name: — Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filinn Zone S Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DateNMI VI I DISAPPROVAL 1 To n Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval • Project Name: — Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Project Application Filing 0 Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded b) Date Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone i own manner Date: "nk ❑ Staff Approval ■ Project Name: Project Description: —t Contact Person and Phone _ Owner, Address and Phone: _ Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application O -/ ".-) h l Date Legal Description: Lot Block Filing , Zone Comments: 62 r Motion by: Seconded by: Summary: 97.1 Date: ROVAL Town Planner Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date July 16, '1984: Project Name: The Lodge at Vail i Employee Cafeteria `& Ski Storage Project Description: Building addition for Employee Cafeteria `ar Ski Storacie Contact Person and Phone The Ruoff Partners hi Architects 12.c. AIA Jerry Meremonte - 476-3051 Owner, Address and Phone: Locicie Prop Ps. 174 East Gore Creek Drive - Vail, Co. 81657 476-5011 Architect, Address and Phone: The Ruoff Partners hip Architects " .c., AIA 500. Lionshead Mall - Vail, Co. 81657 476-3051 Legal Description: Lot A B & C Block 5C _; Filing : Vail Vi ll6ge First , Zone -- Comments: 2 sets of drawin s included Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL summary: Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: L We Printery/veil Project Application Date P tN rojec ame. I Project Description: _ A IA ^ Contact Person and Phone �L,.j rK - Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: h&L L.11A Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Comments: 1* Design Review Board. Motion by: -k-L-V\ Seconded by: - A APPROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone n gfaff Annrnval L� fowl 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW'BQARD AGENDA, AUGUST 15, 1984 2;OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II, Roll Call - Determination of Quorum I-II. Agenda Items; 1. Charl ies T-Shi.rt Shop - Si;gn and Awning Montaneros Building Tabled by the applicant to. August 297 1984 2. Pirog Residence Lot 45 Glen Lyon Approved 3-1-1 Hunn - A'gai'nst Matthews -. Absta Tni:n.g Approved per submittal w1th ro.vi.sjons. ,ite Visit 3. Re -build of retaining wall I The Wren Approved 34-1 Matthews - Abstaining 2 office of community development Approved per submittal. with, condi tion that. trees al qng Gore. Creek, be protected during construction 4, Treetops Commercial Addition Treetops Condominium Approved 5-0 Approved per submittal iq Visit 4 5. Feola-Eklund Residence (Conceptual Review) Lot 5, Block A Vail Ridge No Vote ite Visit 6. Heller Garage Addition 3 Lot 12, Block 1, Vail Village 6th 4-0-1 with conditions Rapson Abstaining Final approval with conditions Site Visit 7. Mountain Haus Re -roof 2 Mountain Haus Denied 5--0 - due to 18-54-050 Section C #6 IV. New Business V. Old Business STAFF APPROVALS Kempf Duplex Wren re -roof Lifthouse Lodge Tyler Re -build of deck Vail Village Inn -- roof over meters MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Steve Caswell Howard Rapson Jack Hunn STAFF PRESENT: Kristan Pritz Thomas Braun MEMBERS ABSENT: Project Application . Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Date Architect, Address and Phone::VBL'U7h) -- Legal Description: Lot Block Comments: Motion by: Seconded by, PPROVAL Filing �`� �'�"'- — , Zone Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Project Application .Date July 27 1984 Project Name: Mountain Haus Roof Remodel. Project Description: Remove the existing ballast of the hot moped roof and replace_ _ it with an EDPM membrane and a Dow LG panel to finish. Contact Person and Phone _.Lynn E itzlen ntratec 827-5732 — Owner, Address and Phone: Moltntain RROCI A+; nn Architect, Address and Phone: Terra+Prr Rny_ 57, ly:ajl co 81658 $27-5739 - Legal Description: Lot 292 E. Meadow Drive, Vail Village Block — — Filing — , Zone Comments: I will have photographs of another similiar installation for the meeting. Design Review Board Motion by: on Seconded by: • Summary: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL T wn Planner u araTT rApprovai Date: Project Application Date i Project Name:,— e Project Description: Contact Person and Phone A=n 1 L N�� •�� — Owner, Address and Phone: o- G o- Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing`�`� — ,Zone Comments: . Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL V1 Summary: Town Planner Date I&MM L�j 11L�i11h.�=��-S�l I EtiILSI FIVE,. """' Mm. LINN, �I= .ME go. K PAR Staff ppr val 3 h N Project Name: Project Description: rr i� Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot D= Blo k Comments: Project Application U Date 't Filing ` �I Zone C1 An 17 ov , & i pn Design Review Board Date bua Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL ISAPPROVAL 5 1 \ W 1 1n�on -t Summary:1 _, 1411 Town Planner Date ❑ Staff Approval 10WHI of vioir/' 75 south lronlage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BQARD AG�N:DA August 2.9$ 1984 2.:QQPM I. Call Meeting to Qrdo.r II. Roll Call - Determi.nati;on of Quorum III. Agenda: office of community development Site V1.si:ts 1. Mountain Haus Re -roof Motion - Hunn Second -.Rapson Denied 5--0 18..54.050 Sec.. B #5 roof, rlate.rials #1 2. Feola/Eklund Residence, Lot 5, Block. A Vail Ridge Moti;Qn, Munn Second Rapson Preliminary Approval #3 3. Spruce. Creek Townhomes � Phase.11I k�oti.on - Rapson Second - H.unn Prel i;mi,nary Approval 5-0 #5 4. Sitzmark, Lodge - Comme.rci.al Addition Motion Rapson Second - Hunn Fi,na.l Approval 4-1 _ B.aldwin against #9 5. Villa Vahalla Exterior Alteration Motion - Baldwi:n is Second -. H.unn Final Approval 5.,0 #2 6. Oarmish Townhomes Sun Room Addition Lot 15, Block 6 - Vail Das Shone #2 Tabled by applicant to September 5th. meeting Site Visit 6 7. Wildflower Restaurant Landscape Pian and Walkway Lodge at Vail Tabled by applicant to September 5th meeting 7 8. Lodge at Vail Store Front re -design C.V.S.D.E. Shop Motion - Hunn Second - Caswell Abstention - Rapson Approved 4-0-1 per submittal 8 9. Lodge at Vail Store front re -design - Cartiers Motion - Rapson Second - Baldwin Motion for denial failed 2-3 Approved as submittal 4. .110. Hill Building Addition and Deck Enclosure Motion - Rapson Second - Caswell Approval 5-0 Preliminary approval 3 11. Kiandra Lodge Sign Change Approved 5-0 Approved per submittal IV. New;Business V. Old Business GRFA MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Mack Hunn Steve Caswell Jack Hunn STAFF PRESENT: Kristan Pri.tz Thomas Braun MEMBERS ABSENT: !I it IDWD of Vol 75 south frontage road vail, caiorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 STAFF APPROVALS: Staff Approvals: office of community development Temporary Traffic Sign for B &B Paving in Four Way Stop Hotel Sonnenalp Signage Charlies T -Shirts R Awning L�I u Project Application Date Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Vi i (-J IC--Ku-A-" Owner, Address and Phone: _ IS4- "'6�7Lr-W f 11 -2— -A-Uiog X37 Architect, Address and Phone: 4 ! [AV A s W Tt-s-f- -"-11194- 1 Le al Description• Lot Block Filing g Comments: Design Review Board Motion by:� — Seconded by: PROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL Zone Planner Date ❑ Staff Approval Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Vi i (-J IC--Ku-A-" Owner, Address and Phone: _ IS4- "'6�7Lr-W f 11 -2— -A-Uiog X37 Architect, Address and Phone: 4 ! [AV A s W Tt-s-f- -"-11194- 1 Le al Description• Lot Block Filing g Comments: Design Review Board Motion by:� — Seconded by: PROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL Zone Planner Date ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date 3 Block 1 Filing Lionshead1rst Legal Description: Lot Zone: Commercial Core II Zoning Approved: Design Review Board Date AAW Motion by: r �llt�i Seconded by: , APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: aAy 110 r� Chief Building Official Zoning Administrator Date: Date: the PlateyNaiI I 1 Project Application 0 Project Name: Project Description: I�m Contact Person and Phone • Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Block Filing Design Review Board Date Date DISAPPROVAL Zone Date: Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval : 4 Project Application Date Auaust 13, 1984 0 Project Name: The Lodge at Vail - C.V.S.O.E h' Project Description: Redesign of store frontrR Contact Person and Phone Allen F. Tafo a Ruoff Partnership Architects - 476-3051 Owner, Address and Phone: Lodcie at Vail 174 East Gore Creek Drive Architect, Address and Phone: 500 Lionshead Mall - Vail Co. 81657 475-3051 Legal Description: Lot A B Block 5C T=iling Vail Village 1st _ , Zone �- Comments: Design Review Board Motion by: N Seconded by: IN APPROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL the pAnlarylvail Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Project Application Filing Date . Design Review Board Date I* Motion by: Seconded by: PPROVA DISAPPROVAL , Zone Tow Planner Date: 2, ❑ Staff Approval U Project Application Date August 13, 1984 Project Name: The- Project Description: Redesign of the store front and si . na eon the Lodge Promenade Contact Person and Phone Allen F. TafO a Ruoff Partnership Architects - 476-3051 Owner, Address and Phone: I-.od a at Vail 174 East Gorek Dr' - Vail CQ- 816557 Architect, Address and Phone: 500 Lionshead Mall Vail, Co. 81657 476-3051 Legal Description: Lot A, B 8 C , Block 5C Filing _Vail Village 1St Zone CC1 Comments: Motion by: Seconded bl, Design Review Board ;-3 Date DISAPPROVAL L44;77-- Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Application is Project Name: Project Description: Reroofing existing built: up roof Contact Person and Phone Lynn Fritzlen 827-5732 Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Date Au ust 1984 The Mountain Haus Condominium Association, Box 1748 Vail., Colorado 81658 476•-2434 intratect, Box 57, Vail Colorado 81658 827-5732 Block Filing Comments: _ N w roof o be be now Lightguard panels over an EDPM membrane with a painted finish. 0 Design Review Board Motion by:�� - Seconded by: APPROVAL Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone Y� 1 4 Town Pla ner -)q wDate: Staff Approval :7 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Project Application Date r —X4 e Owner, Address and Phone: r� Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board Motion by:� - Seconded by: d� n Date EI 1184 DISAPPROVAL Town PI neer Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Name: —V&W Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: w Project Application Date JL7 1 Architect, Address and Phone: AW ®® Legal Description: Lot Block 'J Filing V _ , Zone r� - Comments: Design Review .Board Motion by: It } Seconded by, DateWv � 1 MIT - Date 10 Project Name: Project Application Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lots Block Filing • Com Design Review Board Motion by: _ &kTI - Seconded by: • APPROVAL A Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone Town Planner Date: �� �) town, of vol 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA September 5, 1984 2,OOpM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items. 1. Addition to Hill Residence Hill Building (Final) Motion - Hunn • Second - Baldwin Against - Caswell Approval - 4-1 - as submittal office of community development 2. Spruce Creek Townhomes 4Eipal ) otion - Hunn Abstai.ni.ng - Matt4ews Approved 4-0-1 -- approved per submittal with modifications to elevations. Si to Visit #2 3. Garmisch Townhomes Sunroom Addition No show by applicant :7 Site 4. Vail Village Inn Plaza Visit Project Identification Sign #5 Tab.le.d to September 19th meeting., 5, Gondola Bui`ldi:ng --. Solar Collectors MQti`on - Rapson Second - Caswell Abstai'n.i�ng - Hunn. Approval 4-0-1 Approved per subrntttal with conditions 6. Gotthel`s Jewelry Store Sign Motion Caswell. Second Hunn Approved _. 5-0. - per submittal #4 7. Karat's Jewelry Store Remodel Bell Tower Building • Tabled by applicant 8. Lodge at Vail Store Front Remodel Lodge Promanade Motion for Denial - Rapson - Approved 4-1 Second Baldwin Against Caswell Denied because of i:nconsi.stency with. Urban Design Guide Plan. #1 9. Perkin's Residence Garage Addition Intermountain (Preliminary) Tabled by appl i,cant 0 IV. New Business V. Old Business STAFF APPROVALS 1. Inland Insurance Sign, 2. Poynter Residence Window Addi'tion 1�1 MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESE>•IT, MEMBERS ABSENT; Richard Matthews Thomas A. Braun Rick Baldwin Howard Rapson Steve Caswell Jack Hunn I * Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: PROVAL Block Project Application Filing Design Review Board Date Date DISAPPROVAL . Zone .-�•� ��((�r� a.of�f7 t�� �` YI/V� P/t�7"L' ✓�/3 v own Pipnner Sj Date: L 1, l ❑ Staff Approval Project Application 0 Project !Name: Project Description: Date Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing , zone Design Review Board Date�11�] Motion by: Seconded by: PROVAL DISAPPROVAL ' Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date Aw*ust 21 0 1984 -- Project Name:. Gor • Cteek Walk - — Project Description: _Pennanent landsCage scheme for Wildflawer Restaurant & alley, to Gore Creek Dr. Contact. Person and Phone Charles Duncan (C.D.)-- 476-5011 ext. Owner, Address and Phone: _ The Ladcfe at Vail 174 E. Gore, Creek Dr., Vail, Co. 81657 Architect, Address and Phone: _ Warren Platner snriat-P Ch-itp-c!tG 203/,777-6471 -_ 18 Mitchell Dr., New Haven, Conn. D6511 Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion .by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Town Planner Date: Block 3A , Filing Vail Village Filing #1 , ZoneC� Design Review Board V Date DISAPPROVAL © Staff Approval • Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Motion by: Seconded by:���� (!PPSRO�VAL:) Summary: Project Application Filing Design Review Board Date Date DISAPPROVAL To n 11anner ❑ Staff Approval c Date: , Zone • Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Project Application nose �V � 1Ll Owner, Address and Phone: 12�` ` `/ N�` "-- -(Z' 476 Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description.'Lot Comments: Motion by: _ Seconded by: APPROVAL co", 510 1 - Block ,Filing Vi�cu. lWhf[�� Zone Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL Date Town ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date . Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone • Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: — Seconded by: (:A;PPROVAL DISAPPROVAL , Zone Town Planner Date: _ ❑ Staff Approval Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: ' Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Project Application Block _ Filing Date Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL , zone �v (�I own Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Name: Project Descrip Project Application M�fe Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Block Filing Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL , Zone ulti'aC1 SVw To n Planner © Staff Approval Date: p Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Project Application Date Owner, Address and Phone: 7-, Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing �'v �/ Zone A -- Comments: s Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: er Date: Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval • fowl 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA SEPTEMBER 19, 1984 2;OGPM I, Call Meeting to Order I'I. Roll Call Determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items; Site Visit 1. Mountain Haus Re -roof Motion -- Jack Hunn Second - Casewell Denied - 4-1-0 Baldwin approved of roof materials office of community development Denied because of conflict with 18.54.050 #6 2. Goodell Garage - Lot 24, Buffer Creek Re -subdivision Motion -Caswell Second-Hunn Abstention - 1 (Rick Baldwin unable to visit site) Approved 4-0-1 Approved as amended #2 3. Colorado Insight Remodel , Lots E., F, G, H, Blk. SA., Vail. Village lst Motion - Caswell Second - Nunn Approved 5-0-0 #4 4. Weiss Re,roof - Lot 27, Vail Village West Filing #2. Motion for denial - Hunn Second Baldwin Reason for denial cited Approved - 5-0-0 section 18.54.050 C. 6 of Design Review Board Guidelines 03 5. Banner Sports Awning, Lionshead Gondola Building Motion - Hunn Second - Caswell Approved - 5-0 Approved per submittal 0 Visits #5 6. Erikson Garage, Lot 26, Re --subdivision of Bufi•er Creek Motion - Hunn Second - Baldwin Approved 5-0 Approved per submittal with modifications. #1 7. White River Estates, Modification to unit exteriors, Lot 1, White River Estates - Lot 2 Motion - Hunn Second -- Caswell Approved - 5-0 Approved per submittal. IV. New Business V. Old Business • STAFF APPROVALS Banner/Vollbracht re --roof Lodge at Vail Promenade Steps Tuschman Addition - Balcony -windows Northwoods - Unit D Deck Devoe Greenhouse Addition Nilsson remodel of entry - bathroom Mt. Haus Roof Replacement Charlies T Shirts Montaneos Bldg. Manor Vail Door Addition MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Duane Piper (for PEC member) Kristan Pritz Steve Caswell Thomas A. Braun Jack Hunn Rick Baldwin Richard Matthews • MEMBERS ABSENT: Howard Rapson (Duane Piper filling in at meeting) 0 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Comments: Block Project Application Fi Date . Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: '__-4,F7!OVAL Summary: Town Planner Date: DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval , Zone - L� Project Name: Project Description: -77 Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application I Date l Legal Description: LotC �•�^ E N Block s�A Filing,.(TS N- � Zone ,j Comments: esig eview Board Da#e Motion by: m Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 6 Date: I own rldnrref LJ OLCIII nPPFVvai Project Application 0 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Date Legal Description: Lot Block Filing _, u Zone Comments: • • Design Review Board Motion by: `) `"fir Seconded by: APPROVAL crliqDate DISAPPROVAL Date Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date Aug. 20, 1984 . Project Name: Double car arae addition w Goodell residencA Project Description: 181 x 211 double car garage attached ha A ---!sting Y ome _ Contact Person and Phone John and T-oxe to Grande] l - -46-2628 -- Owner, Address and Phone: John and Loyette Goodell 1967 west Circle Drive, Vail, Col. 476.2628 Architect, Address and Phone: -- Legal Description: Lot 24 Block ---- Filing Buffer Or • Resub+ Zone Comments: Design Review Board , Date qI A I I 10M Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL nor Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Project Application _Z Owner, Address and Phone: i • Architect, Address and Phone: 0' Legal Description: Lot Block FilinX/,// ,Zone Comments: A, n . n e / V Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL n e l QTown PI nner Date: ` ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date 19 Sept. 1984 SProject Name: Sunb i rd lodge @ Vail — Project Description: -Exterior Stair- an SCrapi ng & parking paying - Contact Person and Phone Ron Wen - Owner 476-5264 W. Trout 476-1176 Owner, Address and Phone: United Resorts Inc. 1820 E. Sahara X150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89104 (702) 731-1600 Architect, Address and Phone: Trout Creek Architects The Clock Tower 476-1176 Richard Mathews & Assoc P.D. Box 3567 949-5077 Legal Description: Lot Block 1 Filing .. Third Zone Va i 1, L i on she Comments: A). RA" igP-d Stair NQS ii gn - B) Revised 10 car parking (exist = 10 cars proposed = 10 cars) C) Added Landscaping lanters and site lighting . Design Review Board Date r - - Motion by: - - , Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summ ry: t AT I U l7ii1tif11r� fJ� tl►r -�� Town Planner Date ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Project Name: Weiss - Pa vats Townhouses Project Description: Re -roof Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Weiss 476.-585Q Po y -its 476--166 (3 1 Core Creek Dr Architect, Address and Phone: Fi7. 2 Legal Description: Lot 27 Block Filing veil Vila arrP j ct=i �'l'" Zone Comments: 0 Design Review Board r n Motion by: A Ps 1� 0 Seconded by: APPROVAL �V _ Date DISAPPROVAL S -O 11 it town of VO -1 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Al Weiss 1905 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado, 81657 office of community development September 20., 1984 Dear A1, The Design Review Board denied your application for a Pro.Panel I'I roof at their September 19th meeting. Reasons cited for denial were relative to section 18.54.050 C.6 of the Design Reivew Guidelines. Specific problems with the proposed material included. 1. Insufficient standing seams (lack of relief). 2. Too high of glare. 3. Insufficient gauge. 4. Exposed fasteners. This decision can be appealed to the Town Council i.n writting within 10 days of the Design Review Board meeting. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, l Thomas A. Braun Town Planner TAB/rme towl 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA QCTQBER 3, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call - Determination of Quorum office of community development III. Agenda Items site Visits 1. Charlie's Gondola Shop Awning #5 Motion for cfeni:a:l Caswell 34. Reasons cited for denial were. . conflicts with; Second -Baldwin plowing and th.e whole, ideal of the: mall #2 2. Vail Village Inn Plaza Sign No show by appl i,cant. #10 3. Test Vail Mall Bus Stop Motion - Caswell. Second - Matth.ews Approved -- 2-0-1 Abste.ntiQn, Baldwin #3 4.. Wildflower Restaurant Menu Boxes Motion - Baldwin Second - Caswell: Sign Design 3-0 Approved #8 5. Irwin Garage Addition - Lot 45, Vail Village. West Conceptual No Vote 0 #9 #5 G.. Pease and Schutter Residence - Lot 5, Block 2, Vail Village 3rd Final . Motion - Caswell Second - Baldwin 3-0 - Approved. 7. Meadow Creek Lighting Plan Motion - Caswell Second - Baldwin Approved - 3-0 8. Crest Hotel Entry and Re -roof Motion Caswell Second Baldwin Approved - 3-0 - roof material Motion by Baldwin for preliminary approval of entry Second by Caswell - Approved 3-0 #1 ..9. Kittay Residence Antenna Installation - Lot 9, Block 2, Bighorn Sub. 5th Motion for Denial by Matthews Second by Baldwin Denied citing sections 18.54.050 C., &. and 18.54.050 F. 3. #7 10. Sunbird Lodge Stairway Addition Motion - Caswell Final approval for stair design, preliminary approval Second Baldwin for site work and landscaping. STAFF APPROVALS ;Approved - 2-0-.1 r Matthews Abstained Sun Vail Sign Pinos Del Norte Unit L Window Coldstream #8 - Bldg. 1 =Remodel & Addition B'Jani Furs = One Vail Place -sign Arnold Albrecht - Al:teration in Landscape. ; :Crest Re -roof Bottom Chair #12 Golden Peak Timberfalls - addition exist. deck Houston Addition Hooper Remodel Anderson Playroom IV. New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Caswell Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Kristan Pritz Jack Hunn Thomas Braun PEC Member, due to mix up in known a new member had been choosen WWI 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: October 3, 1984 RE: Vail Village Inn Sign Background on this Reauest office of community development This item was present to the Design Review Board at their September 5th meeting. The request is to modify a previously approved "temporary development sign" into a project indentification sign. A number of questions were raised at the last Design Review Board meeting relative to whether the proposed sign is allowed by the code. The following is a summary of how this proposal relates to the sign code. The Proposal This application is for a twenty (20) square foot free standing sign to identify the Vail Village Inn Plaza (see accompanying sheet). As proposed, the sign would refer to the Plaza Condominiums as well as shops. The sign also includes a window to accommodate photos of the project. This is the same sign approved by Design Review Board a number of years ago. As proposed, the front face of the sign would be removed and modified to include this new information. Application with Respect to the Sign Code As was mentioned at the September 5th meeting, this application does not fit clearly into any section of the code For example, section 16.20.190 (wall signs individual business in a multi -tenant building), allows for twenty (20) square feet to identify the building. However, the project has both wall signs and hanging sign, and section 18.20.090 (projecting and hanging signs - individual business in a multi -tenant building) does not have a provision allowing for twenty (20) square feet 0 (over) to identify the building. The staff can find no reason for section 16.20.190 allowing for twenty (20) square feet to identify the building while section 16.20.090 does not. The question of the joint directory was also brought up by the Design Review Board. While this directory does refer to businesses in Phase III, it is an element of Phase II. Phase II is owned by different people than the applicants (of Phase III). Staff Recommendation Staff opinion is that a project of this size does merit some signage to identify it. As mentioned above, there is a grey area in the code as to whether this sign is allowed. Staff can find no reason for the inconsistency in the code and recommend that this project be allowed twenty (20) square feet for identification. Staff recommendation is. for approval of this sign provided it is for the identification of the project only. With respect to this application, Staff would recommend the following conditions; 1. No reference to where one obtains information, i. e. phone numbers, real estate agents, etc.. This information is not necessary for identifying a project. 2. The window be used only to dispaly the entire project by means of a photo, rendering, or site plan. The display of photos showing lobby areas and other interior spaces is inappropriate. The staff feels that this project does need an identification sign. However, it is strongly felt that this sign serve just that purpose - to identify the project. We encourage the above conditions to be approved by the Design Review Board. n Project Application 1 I, 1 1, 01 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Date Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL l_ Town Plaigner _ Date ❑ Staff Approval I • Project Name: Project Descrip Contact.Persor Project Application Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Date IDA� Motion by: Seconded by: 4� APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL , Zone • kr, Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: �li�i Project Name: Project Application Date '3Er to t 091 -- Project Description: Contact Person and Phone T m B 1 , uoA) Peo M AW4617' E 0, ��4_ jg00 Owner, Address and Phone: /Y►Tr/�dJr1 CWK �N�i`✓�1t �PUr`U!�{ '; "��`� ° �Q$ �' rt`al� f"Jk`�t j�p I AIL , y &k3 7 ' 726 —yYb0 Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot jC 3 A , Block A! , Filing Zone WA Comments: W6ffT d Li AJ166 Z22—�A�/�Ci'� Design Review Board Date Motion by: i Seconded by: e��1�no APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL t �GJ CW f own Nlanner Li 5tatt Approvai Date: W-3 1A Project Application Date L Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone !� & M Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block — Piling Zone Comments: �`t eAddvlja� Ar Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: lt1►P- PPROVAL Summary: 0.1 Town Planner Date: Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval Project Application • Project Mame: Arthur K i t t a y Date Project Description: Satellite Antenna Residential Installation Seatember 18th, 1984 Contact Person and Phone Richard A. Irwin, Universal TVR Audio -Visual Electronics 303) 949-1457 Owner, Address and Phone: M r . Arthur Kitt a 5089 Gore Circle, Vail, CO 81657 (303)476-4594 Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot , Block 2 „ Filing , Zone .mmVie in t4,e Design Review Board Motion by: xL Seconded by: ^^ ROVAL Summary V -Town Planner Date: b G 0U Date _ DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date Project Name: 5' } Project Description:p _C�t>'i2�= Contact Person and Phone e 'ff /1=` SI'Az Lf—) �76-/,7.J CL- - Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot , Block , Filing , Zone 0 Design Review Board Motion by: cz it& " Seconded by: Edldwi C� APPROVAL Date — 1430 DISAPPROVAL Date iProject Name: Project Descrip Contact Person anu riwipu Project Application Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL , Zone Town Planner Date: _ ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date * Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone 4AI Owner, Address and Phone: IAA /<O " 'y Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot 2, Block Filing Comments: • oard �jrfl^ c rZt't'� Date Motion by: AYI, 9 Seconded by: 54&f4A PR �T� DU�1 7�� r /� ` DISAPPROVAL Summary T wn Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: , Zone 0 - lows 75 south frontage road nail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Mr. Richard Irwin Universal JVR Electronics_,. Inc.. Box 5520 Avon, Colorado, 81620 office of community development October 9, 1984 Dear Richard, The Design Review Board considered your request for a satel l i--te. antenna dish for the. Ki,ttay, res:i.de.nce at their October 3rd meeting. This request was unamimously, denied by- the Board for the follow. reason. 1. Incompatible with sections 18.54.050 F. (3), and 18.54.0500. (7). As you know; you have ten days. from the date of the meeting to appeal this deci,s•i.on to the Vail Town Council. Please feel free to call me with. any questions you may. have, Sincerely, Thomas A. Braun Town Planner TAB/rme 0 0 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Project Application Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: 011 Town Planner Date: Block Piling Design Review Board M Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval Zone 0 1. , Project !Name: ) Project Description: Contact Person and Phone .3t Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application 7 Date �R Legal Description: Lot Block Filing ' ��'- - -- -- -- Zone Comments: Design Review Board UiflC Motion by: Seconded by: -&A APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL i A i,.' ITINUMMIRMY-WITO W "u- I- WkI E�" - R111,11TIMmigumuffin, 1 t 0 Al � - t "�� vall Project Application Date Project Name:�— Project Description:A__-- Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing • Design Review. Board Date Motion by: _ Seconded by: APPROVA Summary: Town Planner Date: DISAPPROVAL ;iA ❑ Staff Approval Zone 75 south frontage road nail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Will Trout Trout Creek Collaborative Clock Tower Building Vail, Colorado, 81657 office of community development Qctober 9, 1984 Dear Will , . The Design Review Board reviewed your proposal for a new exterior stairs and landscaping at the Sunbird Lodge. The design of the stairs received final approval by the Board. The "preliminary drawings submitted by- Bill yBill Kl i enman on Thursday are being reviewed by Public Works and the Building Department. I will be in touch with Bill regarding their comments. The site work/landscaping recieved only a prelimi.nary approval by the Design Review Board. Greater detail was requested by the Board in the following areas: 1. A "Lionshead Mall Light" is available for your use - if you are going to use it, where will it be installed? If it is not to be used - what is your alternative lighting plan? 2. Timber Walls What ar•e the heights of the walls around the -Planting areas? 3. Paving Will. the entire area be paved with the Lionshead Paver? The site plan indicates the pavers stop before they reach the stairs -- what surface is to be. used in this area? 4. Grade Change The grade change around the transformer • has been addressed in the most recently submitted plans. 5. Trees tn<the Parking Area. Same. Board members voiced concern ov rere the: appropriateness of locati.ng trees i:n between parKi,ng $tal l s . It may, be wise to remove these from. the plan.. In addition to the design considerations mentioned above, a letter will be needed from Vail As (and the Sunbird Lodge)., address the design of the stairs, their encroachment onto Vail Associates property, and their maintainence. This will be needed prior to the issurance of the. building permit. Sincerely, Thomas A. Braun Town Planner . TAB/rme 0 • Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Owner, Address and Phone: Project Application M -+- Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot BI Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: — APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL & - EA66 "" 1 Zone Date: Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Project Application W�tProject Name: -WIN " Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Date , Zone Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 3 D 0 Town PI nner ❑ Staff Approval Date: 10wo of �Vll 75 south frontage road vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 office of community development DESIGN REVTEW BOARD AGENDA October 17, 1984 2:OOPM. I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call, determination of Quorum III. Agenda Items: 1. Village Inn Plaza Sign No show 2. Meadow Creek Lighting Plan Proposal denied.3 - to 1. 18.54.050 11C Motion - Hunn Second - Baldwin (uplighting major problem) 3. Feola/Eklund Residence Motion to Approve - 4-0 Motion - Hunn Second - Baldwin Site Visit #1 4. Dilling Garage Lot 3, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision Motion - Baldwin Preliminary approval, landscape plan Second - Caswell to be submitted to Staff Approval 4--0 75 south frontage road Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: October 3, 1984 RE: Vail Village Inn Sign office of community development Back round on this Request This item was present to the Design Review Board at their September 5th meeting. The request is to modify a previously approved "temporary development sign" into a project indentification sign. A number of questions were raised at the last Design Review Board meeting relative to whether the proposed sign is allowed by the code. The following is a summary of how this proposal relates to the sign code. The Proposal This application is for a twenty (20) square foot free standing sign to identify the Vail Village Inn Plaza (see accompanying sheet). As proposed, the sign would refer to the Plaza Condominiums as well as shops. The sign also includes a window to accommodate photos of the project. This is the same sign approved by Design Review Board a number , of years ago. As proposed, the front face of the sign would be removed and modified to include this new information. Application with Res ect to the Sign Code As was mentioned at the September 5th meeting, this application does not fit clearly into any section of the code. For example, section 16.20.190 (wall signs -.individual business in a multi -tenant building), allows for twenty (20) square feet to identify the building. However, the project has both wall signs and hanging sign, and section 18.20.090 (Projecting and hanging signs - individual. business in a multi -tenant building) does not have a provision allowing for twenty (20) square feet Site Visit #4 5. Les Del�ces de. France pelig Lazier Lionshead Arcade Motion -- Caswell Second - Humm Approval - 4-1 Preliminary approval Site Visit #6 6. Ramshorn Lodge Landscaping and Paving Plan Motion - Caswell Second - Hunn Approval - 4-0 Site Visit #5 7. The Lodge Employee Ski/Cafbt-eH'a Facade` Alteration: and: Mural . Preliminary Approval 4-0 with conditions Motion - Matthews Second - Caswell Site Visit #2 8. Simba Run Sign Approved 4-0 Motion - Hunn Second - Caswell Site Visit #3 9. Hobbit Hill Sign Approval 4-0 Motion - Hunn Second - Caswell IV. New Business V. Old Business Charlie's Awning MEMBERS PRESENT: Jack Hunn Steve Caswell Rick Baldwin Richard Matthews 0 STAFF APPROVALS: Chamonix Chalet Landscaping Berm Village Antiques Signage - Village Inn Plaza A1penrose Remodel Sun Vail MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Viele STAFF PRESENT: Kristan Pritz Tom Braun to identify.the building. The staff can find no reason for section 16.20.190 allowing for twenty (20) square feet to identify the building while section 16.20.090 does not. The question of the joint directory was also brought up by the Design Review Board. While this directory does refer to businesses in Phase III, it is an element of Phase II. Phase II is owned by different people than the applicants (of Phase III). Staff Recommendation Staff opinion is that a project of this size does merit some signage to identify it. As mentioned above, there is a grey area in the code as to whether this sign is allowed. Staff can find no reason for the inconsistency in the code and recommend that this project be allowed twenty (20) square feet for identification. Staff recommendation is for approval of this sign provided it is for the identification of •the project only. With respect to this application, Staff would recommend the following conditions: 1. No reference to where one obtains information, i e. phone numbers, real estate agents, etc.. This information is not necessary for identifying a project. 2. The window be used only to dispaly the entire project bj means of a photo, rendering, or site plan. The display of photos showing lobby areas and other interior spaces is inappropriate. The staff feels that this project does need an identification sign. However, it is strongly felt that this sign serve just that purpose - to identify -the project. We encourage the above conditions to be approved by the Design Review Board. p • Project Application Date o k '7/k Project Name: QX ��.JJ 1 C� - - --- — n Project Description: ,F Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot &62,ae-E r- ztz Comments: 0 Design Review Board Motion by; Seconded by: Ely ka LI Summary: 0 (-'� I -\A, Au�jv (KrA (�A kaj\,� Town Planner Date: t' Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval , Zone Project Application Date Garage Addition for 121r. Richard Dilling Garage addition behind existing house. Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Richard Z • Sexton, 476.4654 Owner, Address and Phone: Richard ll 11 ink, 476-5336 October 8, 1984 p. Project Name: 5146 Black Gore Drive Vail CO 81657 Architect, Address and Phone: Feel Warren Architects 476-4506 P.O. Box 3370 Vail CO 81658 Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Came C;rPek�Subdivis�(Mne Comments: Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: PPROV Date DISAPPROVAL Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval 0 Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Project Application f Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Date U—SecMotion by: MI&U-- Seconded onded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL m mary: , Zone Arl Staff A ro ai Town Pia ner pp Date: 0, Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Project Application �c "Ii Date Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone VI Comments: Design Review Board Date IN . r-�&14 Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Project Application Project Name: Project Description: e Date '-4-- s Contact Person and Phone 1 1 c- �, ?cc rs o'er ::!9:74- S 1 Owner, Address and Phone: oa-' S w I -q- 76 — -15 -G ! Architect, Address and Phone: _ A Legal Description: Lot rah �� - c.;.,L'. �`� rA !'© Q ,SQ Y r Block Filing cz Comments: } I fy S Zone WIA I 40 Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Date Town Planner %aIn El Staff Approval Project Application Date *! Project Name: _ --&4—QAJW Project Description: p l p o- lh/A�IU Contact Person and Phone r � Myr&AJ Owner, Address and Phone: ® lh DM d ,PmN eg Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing bl,4, L Comments: f -Q ,)!! / 8 , Zone Design Review Board Date r+I 8 Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL -D Date DESIGN REVIEWBOARD • November i, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll Call, Determination of Quorum ;ite Visits #4 #3 III. Agenda Items 1. Vail Village Inn Project identification sign Motion - ,lack Hunn Approved as, submitted Second Rick Baldwin Approval 4-Q 2. Les Del ice's de. France Del i EXteri:ar Al t4rA'ti;on Lazier Arcade Motion - Jack Hunn Second - Rick Baldwin Approval. - 4-0 3. Chevron Gas Station Sign Program Approved as subm,i;tted. Motion - Jim Vi;ele Approved as per staff memo, Second Jack Nunn Approval - 34-.1 Abstention - R.lchard.Natth.ews. 4. Lodge Employee Cafeteria Facade Lodge at Vail i,1otion - Jack Hunn Second Rick Baldwin Approved - 4-0 Site Visits 0#2 5. Frith Residence Lions Ridge 4 - Bl k 1 - Lot 3 Motion - Jack Hunn Second - Jim Viele Approved - 3-0 Abstention - Richard Matthews Preliminary Approval #5 6. Performance Sports Exterior Alterations Lazier Arcade Motion - Jack Hunn Second - Rick Baldwin Approved - 4-0 #6 7. Cooper -Cole Exterior Alterations and Signage • Lazier Arcade Motion - Jack Hunn Second - Rick Baldwin Approval 4-0 #1 . 8. Vail Sports. Awni, n� Mill Creek Court. Tabled by applicant to November 21st meeting IV. New Business V. Old Business STAFF APPROVALS: Ski Swap - small awning and glass; front door. Toymaker's Trail -- awning over front door Rockledge Residence - pond taken out of design trees and sh.rub,s added drainage added Chester Flaum - revi'se landscaping Bag and Pack Shop - new sign and location This Wicked .West - re. -paint of store front Treetops Plaza - Application for approval of substituting Foremost Manufacturing #701 standing seam for AFF s:tandi'ng seam.. B1u's Beanery - color change and signage Alpine Collection re -pa i nti'ng Di l 1 i ng Garage addi'ti.on Treetops Condominium Association = enclose two walkways; with plexi-gl.as.s to matc4 top floor, wall kway, L. Russell - deck addition to existing residence The Wren Condominiums - relocation of window Pitkin Creek Park Condominiums - Building 5 and 7 - re -roof. Ruther Duplex - west unit fence - Vail T -Shirt Company - awning Vail Associates Marking Office Sign 1150 Casola r- Del Norte Dr. - restain exterior siding - fascia - window -door trim. MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Jack Hunn Kri'stan Fritz Steve Caswell R.i'c,ha rd. Matthews. Jim Vie.le. Rick. Baldwin STAFF ABSENT, Tom. Braun n u 75 south frontage road vall, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 TQ; Design Rey 'ew� Rod.rd FROM: Department of Cvmmun.ity, QevelopMQnt DATE: November, 7 l 984 office of community development RB: Variance requ.eet to mai:ntai n. extssttng signage. that exceeds what i,s al rowed by the. srgn code. Background. on Th -i's Request,. Existi,n.g signage. at the Chevron Station. has bean out. of comp.11ance with: the sign code for a number of years, (s.pe attached letter for an Inventory of exi.sti ng signage. at the station)a The staff has, been: workil, g with; ChevrQn since earlier th.ts, fail to b.ri: business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention, and do not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises; B. That such special circumstances were not created by the applicant or anyone in privy to the applicant; C. That the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purposes of this title, and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in general; D. The variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of the title any more than is required to identify the applicant's business or use; Staff Recommendation. Staff recommendation is for approval of this variance request. To allow for these signs to remain is in general harmony with the provisions of the sign code. In addition to this, there are special circumstances particular to this site restricting this business ability to draw attention to their enterprise. In considering these requests, it should be pointed out that the decals are guite small and will not be materially detrimental to adjacent property. The signs mounted between the poles also serve as traffic control signs and the logos, when considered with the free standing sign, do not exceed the stations overall allowable of 20 square feet. Conditions of approval for this request should include the following: 1. The free standing "gas price" sign be removed. In lieu of these, price. indicators could be placed atop each pump. These signs should not exceed one square foot. 2. The existing pole mounted Chevron sign be removed by January 1, 1985, this will allow the applicant ample time to complete the installation of the new free standing sign. If the Design Review Board is to entertain a motion approving this request, the staff would recommend these conditions be placed on the approval. • Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Person Project Application Date- � _ 2/7 _ Re � I29 Owner, Address and Phone:1417?V ff—e�� L61 *//DA/ '7WZ;, WN-IT"L2�� / , AzArchitect, Address and Phone: /� ����,X—/A11T� Legal Description: Lot J Block --- ._, Filing ? Zone Comments: fDesign Review Board • Motion by:��� Seconded by:Q x 10i �1�`�i l APPROVAL Date ._ 1k IN r)FGAPPAr)1/AF Date: N V6 ❑ Staff Approval Project Application �Pr Date 10/23L84 - SProject Name: VAIL SPORTS / Awning systems Project Description: Entry/window awning treatment Contact Person and Phone _John QuinnZ Barry Morris 476-1300 / 440-7000 0 302 Gore Creek Drive, Mill Creek Court Bldg, Vail, Co. Owner, Address and Phone: , Barry Morris 440-7000 Architect, Address and Phone: Bruce D. Allen 476-5888 Legal Description: Lot Block Filing , Zone Comments: 11" green/white vertical striped awnings (fire retardant canvas) - Motion by: Seconded by: Design Review Board Date APPROVAL DfSAPPROVAL Summary: Ow. n PI n er Date: �N. -, ❑ Staff Approval 0 Project Name: Project Descrip C'.nntart Person Project Application Date Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: E . Design Review Board Date Motion by: 01'� � , Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 1 , Zone Town Planner J�]- VI t Date: ❑ Staff Approval • Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Person Project Application. Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review. Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: sown Planner Date: AA 1, �q , Zone DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval • Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Person Project Application Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block , Filing . Design Review Board Motion by: y 4 Seconded by: ULO 1 r - — APPROVAL L Summary: , Zone. Alo w nnn by w � 1 t Town P! nner ❑ Staff Approval Date: • Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Owner, Address and Phone: Project Application Date Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing • Design Review Board Motion by: _ Seconded by: APPROVAL Summary: Town Planner Date: _ Date DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval Zone • Project Name: • Project Application Date 1 r 6o /'F07-,su/F.4 r' Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: QW1.1EIP ; COO rzzl? CO /' f Cad 0, b0✓ e ' Architect, Address and Phone: — S f'§!P/47E'4 //57 A V116 -31 G � E —7 Legal Description: Lot Comments: /.'h 6 Block Filing — Ca a o"F" C0/' Motion by: Aute Seconded by: bbw rr+ APPROVAL , Zone a /If AF Design Review Board 0 Date ` DISAPPROVAL 1 Town P anner ❑ Staff Approval Date: Project Application Project Name: �Q�o RNIANCt✓. �P©6�"T5 - - Project Description: ET.L3''Jd Contact Person and Phone —Sjrr—PF-1-. 4? -.5,349 -- Owner, Address and Phone: SAHj: As comjA['P K!30!Sl Architect, Address and Phone: dG IF—PHEM R IC, UA RIQS - �©• gQx u EAC LIK� Legal Description: Lot Block Filing , Zone esign Review Board Motion by: "A Seconded by: "D r' i - APPROVAL. tl Date � DISAPPROVAL s K �1�1 Town Planner ❑ Staff Approval Date: Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Project Application Date Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Date Motion by: }4� Seconded by: �'"401 Y APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL 0 Summary: �1- U160 i.\1 Lie. I. i� 'W 1 Town Planner Date: ` ❑ Staff Approval , Zone Project Application Date Project Name: Project Description: Employee Cafeteria and Ski Lockers Lodge Cafeteria and Ski Lockers Contact Person and Phone Jay K• Peterson 476-0092 Owner, Address and Phone: Lodge Properties, Inc. 476-5011 174 East Gore Creek Drive Architect, Address and Phone -Warren Plattner Associates 18 Mitchell Drive, New Haven, CT 203/777-6471 Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing October 3, 1984 , Zone Modification request to existing approval for the employee cafeteria and ski lockers. Dellan Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: nio A MMDn%/AI • Date: Ian ❑ Staff Approval r1 ite Visits #1 n n U lows 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN, REVFEW BOARD AGENDA November 21, 1984 2;QOPM I. Call meeting to order. I I . Roll Call, dete.rm.inati.on of quorum III. Agenda Items 1. A & D Buildi.n remodel. (Frelimi;nary. Review) CCI Vai .. Village ?0qour Store and Deli Building) Motion crack Hunn Second. - di'm Viele Approval - 4-t0. Prel imjna.ry, Approval 2. Frith Residence (Final. Revj ew Li'onsridge Motion -dim Vi,ele. Second R R.i.ck. Baldwin Approved r 3 _. 1 abstention , Ri;c.,h-ard Matthews 3. Mountain Haus Exterior Alteration Vail Village Tabled to next meeting - December 5, 1984 (ove&) office of community development L I TV. New Business Amphitheatre work shop November 27, 1984, Vail Library, 11:00AM to 12:OOPM V. Old Business Design Review Board up coming schedule STAFF APPROVALS Currents Awning -Signage Golden Peak Base Facility - automati.c fix dispenser- approved per sumittal with only one sign One Vail Place - automatic fi.x dispense - signage approved for 1 12"x12" plaque Breakaway West - dumpster enclosure change.of location Pritz Addition - airlock/storage additi.o.n - 10Q square feet removed herrod/Arnold - roof replacement exact same roof material ..MBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: STAFF ABSENT: Jim Viele Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Jack Hunn L1� Steve Caswell Kristan Pritz Tom Braun • n I� 0 IN 75 south frontage road nail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 office of community development TO: Design Review• Board FROM: Kristan Pri'tz and Tom Braun SUBJECT: Design Review Board Agenda and A & D Building Background Information DATE: November 21, 1984 Enclosed in this packet i.s. the agenda for the November 21, 1984, Design Reui'ew Board meeting as. well as the information on the A & D Building. I have included: 1. Vai'l Village Design Considerations. 2. Minutes from the October 8, 1984, PEC meeting. 3. Staff memo October 8, 1984. The A & D proposal wi: r Planning and Environmental Commission October 8, 1984 PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Diana Donovan Peter Patten Duane Piper _ Tom Braun Howard Rapson Larry Eskwith Jim Viele Betsy Rosolack Jer Waiters ABSENT Scott Edwards Gordon Pierce The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Duane Piper at 3:10 pm. I. Approval of minutes of September 24. Rapson moved and Donovan seconded to approve the minutes. Vote was 5-0 in favor. 2. Request for a conditional use Permit in order to sell Christmas trees in the West Vail mall in the area adjacent to Dairy ween, the Vail Athlete and Bullocks. Applicant: Vail's Little Flower Shop It was decided to discuss item 4 frfor 4. Request for exterior alteratiotheA & D Building or Store Building) located on Bridge Street and G re Creek Drive. Applicant: I.K.S. Vail Associates. Peter Patten explained the revised or oposal showing site plans, elevations and photographs. He stated that the proposal to have a trash compactor had made great strides. Patten pointed out that the outdoor dining area on Bridge Steet had been raised to street level and the tables in the area would be in the sun. He added that although there would be 3 fewer tables, there was an addition of another dining deck on the Mill Creek side of the building, so actually the overall result was more dining tables available. He pointed out that one stairway on the Bridge Street side of the building had been eliminated, resulting in more transparency and more retail space. Patten reviewed the sub -area concepts and the Design Considerations.as well as the zoning code compliance and the conditions of approval. Jay Peterson showed a model and discussed its features. Robert (Buff) Arnold, architect for the project answered some questions. When questioned, Arnold stated that the size of the original building was 9,800 square feet on two floors and the new proposal would be a total of 13,500 over three floors. Pepi Gramshammer objected to the amount of increase of the building and to the idea of taking trash across the street. Peterson pointed out that Pepi had added onto his building in the past, and that the appearance was good. r t � r PEC 10/8/" -2- Otto Stork, owner of the adjacent building, stated that the building looked OK to him and was an improvement. He asked about deliveries, and was told deliveries to the restaurant and deli would be on the Mill Creek side. Howard Rapson had to leave the meeting, and addressed three concerns: pavers in the loading area (he wanted to see the paving line continued in a straight line), the width of the walkway next to Mill Creek, and the facade on the Ruct. ack side of the building. Rapson felt that stucco should be carried around on that side as well, and added that this was probably a DRB question. Rapson then left the meeting, but gave his vote by proxy to the chairman. Donovan felt that it was not practical to carry trash from a restaurant so far, and also was concerned about pedestrians walking through the Mill Creek patio. She said that this was illegal with respect to liquor licensing. Donovan felt that the Gore Creek Drive side of the building should have planters to separate pedestrians from trucks, and she questioned the need for more commercial space and whether or not it was proper to build up to the neighbors even though there were no setbacks. Jere Walters suggested keeping the trucks across Mill Creek. Patten answered that this was already a loading zone and there wasn't enough loading space at present. Walters felt that this area could be made into a non -loading zone. Peterson said they would love to do some planting, but were told by the Public Works that they couldn't. Peterson said.that the road was wide and it could use vegetation. Walters encouraged elevators for the restaurant. Viele agreed with the concern about the pedestrian way on Gore Creek Drive, and suggested that the Town invest in better equipment and more man power and include planters to separate the pedestrians from the trucks. Piper felt that the project was a positive one, but agreed that there should be a separation for pedestrians. Piper added that there were usually two cars instead of trucks in the loading zone., Peterson stated that the liquor license gave them possesion of the whole deck on Mill Creek. He added that this was mostly a food operation not a bar and agreed to try to get a pedestrian pathway next to the creek separated from the patio. Patten stated that a separate pedestrian way was a good idea, but wondered how to get people to use it, since it would not lead to more commercial area. He stated that the staff would check to see how to get public easement through the back along Mill Creek. Patten pointed out that the trash compactor would serve 5 buildings and this meant that all four sides of these buildings were free of trash. He then suggested that the PEC decide whether or not they wanted to have a public easement along Mill Creek. Peterson stated that the applicant would agree to give public access along the creek. Discussion followed concerning access to Otto Stork's store. Piper felt that condition #3 should be stricken (concernin§ a letter of credit), and Donovan disagreed. Viele moved and Walters seconded to approve the request for exterior alteration' ' to the A & D Building per the staff memo dated 10/8/84 with the following modifications: Remove #3 and replace it with a condition to include a pedestrian walkway along the north side of the building subject to a roval b the TOV, using more intensive landscaping and a condition to providepedestrian ease- ment aloes Mill Creek. The vote -was -4-0 in favor with a favorable vote by proxy from Rapson as well. T .. .... .. . , - k .. M� t �'N�.'���`ro?r��: ye , f y. ,. "�"S'-� 1 .�s�c,;�u ySt�'�itr+�„.. `�s-�>.�+::.,a-:fi:id� . •�.�- ..'� � ..+� "' • TO: 'PIanning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: October 8, 1984 SUBJECT: Request for exterior alteration in CCI for the A & D Building (revised from previous proposal). Applicant: RTS Capital Services I. BACKGROUND On September 4, 1984 the Town Council unanimously tabled the previous proposal fqr the A & D Building remodel due to dissatisfaction with the infill of the existing outdoor dining area along Bridge Street as well as the excess frontage of stairways on Bridge Street. Council also indicated that they would like the applicants to explore a second .level dinining deck on the northwest'corner of the building as well as more relief to the north facade of the building. Also, a scheme including trash removal facilities on the property was to be submtted in the event the trash compactor project across the street fell through. The applicants have revised the proposal and addressed most of the issues of concern at the Council level. Some other minor revisions have been incorporated into the revised proposal and will be discussed within this - review. II. COMPLIANCE WITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF COMMERCIAL CORE I The Commercial Core I district is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environ- ment. The Commercial Core I district is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribed site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting .on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the village. The staff feels after reviewing the revised proposal that the project now complies with the purpose section of Commercial Core I zone district. h C A&D 'lding -2- 10/8/84 k III. SUB -AREA CONCEPTS OF THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN A. Sub -Area Concept No. 6 Entry "gateway to Village core. Road narrows to one lane exit to discourage counter -flow traffic. "Mill Creek bridge" image, is mechanism for narrowing --reinforces gateway sense, emphasizes creek, and provides pedestrian path separate from roadway (by bridge railings) to further tie Mill Greek Court into pedestrian loop. This concept of narrowing the street in this area as well as the separated pedestrian bridge over the creek has been discussed internally with the Town of Vail departments of Public Works and Fire as well as with the applicants. The Public Works and Fire departments are opposed to any narrowing of the Town of Vail right-of-way in the Village core area due to negative impacts upon snow storage and fire fighting capa- bilities. The separated pedestrian bridge is an excellent idea for reinforcing the concept that the Mill Creek Court commercial activity and the open space around Mill Creek should be a larger part of the Vail Village shopping and pedestrian activity zone. However, with relationship to this proposal it is felt that that improvement would be one made under a general Vail Village special improvement district and not one specifically attached to the remodel of the A & D Building. B. Sub -Area Concept No. 15 Facade improvements. Eyesores removed, increased facade transparency, entries simplified and oriented to intersection. The facade improvements called for in the sub -area concept are being incorporated by removing the eyesores and -increasing facade transparencies, etc. However, the Council did ask the applicant for further "breaking up" of this facade to add more visual interest to the elevation. The revised proposal does show an additional entry close to the intersection of Bridge Street and Gore Creek Drive which adds a minor amount of visual interest, while the remaining facade is the same as the previous proposal. The staff feels that although more could be done in terms of breaking up this north facade, the improvements called for in this sub -area concept are basically being achieved and realizes that pro- grammatic requirements along with proximity to the property line in this area do not allow for a great deal of flexibility on this issue. C. Sub -Area Concept No. 16 Key intersection in Village core. Feature area paving treatment. While the proposal does include new brick pavers on three sides of the building, the applicant will be required to participate in the improvement district creating future area paving treatment for the intersection. • A (- Bldg -3- 10/8/84 IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VAIL VILLAGE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A. Pedestrianization The staff feels that pedestrianization has been greatly improved with the recent revisions to the proposal. The revised proposal allows a new route for the pedestrian to enter onto the property between the outdoor dining area and the retail shop. Another major improvement to the pedestrianization along Bridge Street is the raising of the existing grade in the area of.the existing outdoor dining deck to street level and extending the brick pavers southerly to the adjacent property. This will allow a wider, more pleasant walking experience into this area in which the pedestrian will be drawn into by the retail activity as well as the outdoor dining activity. Pedestrianization in the other areas of the proposal basically remain the same as in the previous submittal. B. .Vehicle Penetration No change from the previous submittal is presented. The loading zone on the north side of the building will remain and no bollards to keep the trucks a certain distance from the building will.be installed. The staff is concerned that the existing loading zone which will continue. with the remodel will hinder the viability of the new Mill Creek activity on the east side of the building. We have looked at areas for additional loading zones in the immediate area but have not come up with a viable alternative at this time. We will continue to explore avenues to encourage the pedestrian to move easterly along Gore Creek Drive toward the Mill Creek area. C. Streetscape Framework r] Some major improvments to the stre.etscape framework are now incorporated into the proposal. Proposed is to retain and upgrade the outdoor dining area along Bridge Street by moving it toward Bridge Street as well as increasing the grade of the deck to street level. The retail shop is smaller than what was proposed previously and is located on the eastern side of the existing outdoor dining area where access to the sun is more limited. The proposal now complies with the Guide Plan in that it is providing the open space node which is called for under the plan and retains and improves the very important function of ' td dining in the Village core. ou oor A second major improvement to the streetscape framework is the reduction ' of stairways along Bridge Street to those that are absolutely necessary for the functioning of the building. This increases retail frontage and complies with the intent of the Village Core in the Urban Design Plan in that it adds vitality and interest to the guests walking along Bridge Street. ts�� �,. A & D('dg -4- 10/8/84 •` D• Street Enclosure The street enclosure proposed is approximately one half to one which is the desirable ratio as found in the Urban Design Guide Plan. This desirable ratio is achieved by slightly increasing the existing street enclosure which is approximately one quarter to one, E. Street LdQe Again, the street edge is greatly improved under the revised plans. The street edge is now much more irregular, similar to the existing building and provides added vitality and interest by the allowance of a new pedestrian way between the retail shops and the outdoor dining area, as well as increasing retail frontage along Bridge Street, The street edge is nicely complemented with planters along the Bridge Street frontage. The street edge is also improved along Gore Creek Drive, in the back of the building on the Mill Creek frontage. It is hoped that with signage and other means that the pedestrian will be successfully drawn down Gore Creek Drive to the east toward this new dining area. commercial and outdoor F. Building Nei ht The proposal is two and three stories high in keeping with the Design Considerations and it never exceeds 33 feet with habitable space. Two architectural projections will break up the roof line and the new third story condominium is tucked back behind the four-story portion of the Rucksack building to relate to that building's mass. G. Views ;1 • f, 3 No effect upon any designated major view corridor is proposed. The sensitive placement of the new dwelling unit preserves views from the upper levels of the Casino Building across the street. Service and Delivery 'ti,"i-,,-Same great progress has recently been made .an the trash compactor project to.the east of the pre House. The ff is certain that this project will move.forward and mill:beaconstrucOted before ski season occurs. The applicant has submitted an alternative plan to provide trash facilities on the northeast corner of the The inclusion of the trash facility in this location would jeopardize flding• r in a major way the viability of the new outdoor dining area and commercial i} antivity on the east side of the building. have attended the recent meetings involving the trash compactor, and there is no opposition to their participation from the other pro owners involved. We are positive that the trash facilties fotheerty A & D Building will'be able to be located across the street in new compactor facility. the F' V x > U C I. Sun/Shade A & D Bld( -5- 10/8/84 Sun/shade factors are improved in this proposal in that the outdoor dining area now comes out much closer toward Bridge Street where the access to the sun is better. Also, the second level dining deck on the Mill Creek side has been removed, allowing additional sun to come into this area and make it more attractive to the pedestrian to enter. In exploring the second level dining deck along the intersection of Bridge Street and Gore Creek Drive, the applicant discovered that this would increase the shade on the ground level where the major entrances to the building are located. Thus, this exploration.of the dining deck in this area has concluded with the proposal to not construct one. VI. ZONING CODE ITEMS The proposal is in compliance with the uses and development standards as outlined for Commercial Core I. The proposed GRFA is 2,050 square feet, while 5,588 square feet of GRFA is allowed. Site coverage allowed is 80% and this is what is proposed. The conditional use permit required for the elimination of two dwelling units on the second level was granted by the Planning Commission on August 27, 1984. VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the revised proposal of the A & D Building. We feel very positive about this proposal in that significant improvements have been made addressing our previous concerns. The Bridge Street frontage is..greatiy improved and will add vitality and interest to the street by retaining the outdoor dining and improving the uses fronting on Bridge Street with. -the elimination of the excess stairways. We feel the building design overall will be a very positive addition to the Village core in that the creation of an activity node along Mill Creek will begin to highlight that area as one of great potential for the Village. Also, by extending the brick paver walkway to the south to the Shades of Vail property the circulation in this area becomes much more desirable for the pedestrian. The following are conditions of approval for the project: -1. The applicant shall not remonstrate against and shall participate in a Village improvement district if and when formed. j r 2. The applicant shall participate in a trash compactor facility located to the east of the Ore House, or in the event the compactor facility is not constructed, will provide for the trash facility as alternatively proposed in this submittal. t 3. A letter of credit shall be requested to insure that the project will be completed. C A('D Bldg -6- 10/8/84 ` 4. Approval of the encroachment upon Town of Vail land along Mill Creek as well as a subsequent approval of a flood plain modification request if necessary. 5. Removal of a section on the north end of the new wall along Mill Creek to facilitate snow removal in this area to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. 6: No additional drainage along"Bridge Street or Gore Creek Drive shall` occur over the existing situation. -. Y •s i ., r 5 � .-> � ?�, a 4'R1 .'ti r s� - t � -�iP -'^- a �,£ H»t'� �. € - � ^'+x. lowl 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 Stuart Frith P. 0. Box 261 Avon, Colorado, 81620 Hear Stuart, office of community development October 8, 1984 . RE: Lot 3, Bl k 1, 0m R, dge Fjl i:ng 4 Frith Residence on November 7, 1984, the. Design Review Board gage preliminary approval to the Frith Residence. The following comments were made: 1. More detail is needed on the carport and garage facades. 2. Garage doors on the carports would improve the appearance of the site -storage would be concealed. 3. A landscaping pocket in between the two garages would improve the appearance of the driveway area. 4. Investigate pitch of the roof and gravel.. Is this type of roof treatment going to create a problem? 5. The one garage window could be mirrored on the other garage. 6. Color elevations could be helpful but are not required. 7. An Employee Housing Agreement must be signed by the time a building permit is released. a 8. Engineering Concerns: A. Show % grade of driveway. B. Provide soils and foundation report by the time of building permit. C. Provide information on numbers 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 in the Title Report. D. Walls in R. 0. W should be shortened, especially on the east side of the site, a Revocable Right of Way Agreement will also be needed. Please call me if you have any questions. I will plan on you for the November 21, 1984, meeting. Sincerely, �T�sAar\ �* Kristan Pritz Town Planner KP/rme • Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Project Application Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Block Filing Design Review Board Date Motion by: �• 4� - — Seconded by: V 0� } APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Summary: } TownPlanner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Zone �— \\ V Project Application 1 Project Name: Project Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner, Address and Phone: Date Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: > Design Review Board Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL n(J4 10 r L it MI Sam 1106 W-0 Date DISAPPROVAL TownPlanner stav pproval Date: 1 aL.i I IIA460— � � lows _ 75 south frontage road nail, colorada 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA DECEMBER 5, 1984 2:0OPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll call, determination of quorum III. Agenda: Site Visit #1 1. Mountain Haus Deck Enclosure Tabled by Applicant Site Visit #, 2. Bj Ani Furs Awning and Sign Vail Village Motion - Hunn Second - Caswell Approval - 4-0 office of community development iite Visit #2 3. Village Center Building - Evaluation of completed work in comparison to Design Review Board approved proposal. Motion - Hunn Second - Caswell Approved - 3-1-0 Site Visit 4. Vail Sports Sign & A,wnin.g 40 Mill Creek Court Building Motion - Caswell Motion for denial was approved 4-0, ci,ted section Second - Hunn 18.54.050 A of Design Review Board Guidelines Approval 4-0 Awning denied (_over) i 48. Vai:l Sports. Sign Motion - Caswell Second Hunn IV.New Business V. Old Business MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Caswell loc k Hunn ck Baldwin Richard Matthews r--I LJ approved 4,0, MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Viele STAFF PRESENT: STAFF ABSENT: Tom Braun . Kristan Pritz 11 Project Application Date 11/2784 "Project Name: Vail Project Description: its Si 171,x60" wood si it Contact Person and Phone John Quinn 476-1300 Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Bruce D. Aden 476- 58$8 -- Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Storefront has 33 li.neacr feet = 6.60 sq/ft of allowed -signage Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL Design Review Board -6 Date DISAPPROVAL u e dce 61 1 Town Planner Date: ❑ Staff Approval Project Application Date • Project Name: Project Description: iV Contact Person and Phone / Owner, Address and Phone:��'�`� Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot f I Lovrr�ing Comments: Zone Design Review Board Date ---- Motion by: �J Seconded by: PPROVAL DISAPPROVAL T wn Planner Date: r` ❑ Staff Approval 10 Project Name: Project Descrip Contact Persor Owner, Address and Phone: Project Application n -+- Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: —AAA Seconded by: Project Application Date 11/26/84 Project Name: "B' jani Pars" Awnin& System -signage _ Project Description: Black storefront awning (fire retardant canvas w/white_letteripg/white red trim accent Contact Person and Phone Mr. Robert Keller Z 476-1116 % 476-7129_ B'_Lani_ Fure.Vall Street, Vail,Co Owner, Address and Phone: Same as above Architect, Address and Phone:-grilCe D. Allen 476-558P Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone Comments: _ Iron famed custom awning I signage sn, t . 6S FT of f w Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL Town Planner. U Staff Approval Date: �� f i to lisits #6 NO v VTO� 75 south frontage road vall, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 1984 2:OOPM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Roll call, determination of quorum III. Agenda: office of community development 1. Village Center Sign Program Village Center Motion - Jack Hunn Second - Jim Viele Approved 5-0 Conceptual Approval for Sign Program Final Approval for La Tour Restaurant sign 7 square feet #3 2. Le Petite Cafe Menu Box Lionshead Motion - Jack Hunn Second - Rink Baldwin Motion to deny appli:catton passed 5-0, citi'ng incompatibility with surrounding area and non-compliance with section 16.20.020 of Sign Code. #2 3. Mataam Fez Sign Vail Run Building Motion Jim Vi,el e. . Second - Jack Hunn Approved 5-0 per submi,tta.l (over) Site Visits Kane Residence Satel i to Dish #4 Booth Falls Application withdrawn by applicant IV. New Business Vail Professional Building Sign Application V. Old Business STAFF APPROVALS: Currents Awning -Signage Treetops Plaza -- Leasing sign Louis's Casual Cabso Inc. Ramshorn Lodge. Sign The Squash Blossom - Racquet Club Restaurant - Exterior Alteration Lazier Arcade - Design Furs Ski Express sign One Vail Place Commercial Area Lighting MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Caswell Jack Hunn Richard Matthews Rick Baldwin Jim Viele 0 MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Tom Braun Kri,s.tan Pri;tz STAFF ABSENT: • Project Application Date 1 Project Name: Y i Y• �i Project Description: � o il U � `e��'f (►1 � /�Fe ru Psi t ►n aL N1 � P�'n n, v.� rl. ltd l�� .r' t: Z. L]4 IIIG -�1,►� �p,se., 9Q td,�ibu�, red cxc,,i tic �a�n ContactPerson and Phone ' 44 w Owner, Address and Phone: �d ( �L�d C2Vd VLe('0 Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Comments: Filing Design Review Board Date �rV Summary: Town Planner Date: �� AvA, DISAPPROVAL ❑ Staff Approval Zone pppppp :oleo 4 aauueld u 01 dd e hm 1 i n r%^ Jeno, d tt lS ❑ [V/%uti(jc)vwu 0-1 ;Aq papuooag i :Aq uoi;oyq a;ea AtUITIT— paeo8 MOIAaa u6isa(3 • buJ1ld M0019 :sluawwoo joi :uoJiduosap Je6a-1 auoyd pue ssa,ppy '1001140JV :auoyd pue ssaappy '.OUMO alep V� _ L� ) 0) uoileoilddb 1001oad I`P pue uos,ad 10etu00 :uoi#dJ,osap 10afo,d :,wet,} 109fo,d,,