Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992- 8 Providing for the Establishment of Special Development District No. 28, Christiana at Vail~ ,~ . r , f ' "ORDINANCE NO. B Series of 1992 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT Of= SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 28, CHRISTIANIA AT VAIL; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT' DISTRICT NO, 28 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER ~8.4f) OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes Special Development Districts within the Town 3n order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and WHEREAS, application has been made for Specie! Development District approval for a certain parcel of property within the Town, legally described as Lot D, Bfocic 2, Vall Village First Filing, and Lot P-3, Block 5-A, Vail Village Fifth Filing; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed SDD, and has submitted a recommendation for approval to the Town Council; and WHEREAS. alt notices as required by Section 'i8,86.08~ have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a pubiic hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the Vail Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAiI_. COLORADO THAT. Section 1 The Town Council finds that all the procedures for Special l~evelapment Districts in Chapter # 8.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied. Section 2 The Town Council finds that the development pion for Special Deveiopment District No. 28 meets each of the standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Cade of the Town of Vaii or demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved, In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the development plan for Speciai Deveiopment District No. 28 is approved. The development plan is comprised of those plans submitted by Pierce, Segerberg & Spaeh Architects, and consists of the following documents: 1 1. Sheet No. A1, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 16, 1992 (site plan). 2. Sheet Nos. A2-A5, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 16, 1992 (first, second, third and fourth floor plans}. 3. Sheet No. A6, dated January 27, 1992 (roof plan}. 4. Sheet Nos. A7-A9, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 16, 1992 (North, South, East and West elevations). 5. Sheet No~ Li, dated January 2'7;:1992 and revised March G and March 16, 1992 (landscape plan). B. Parking Ptah for Lot P-3, dated February 8, 7992 and revised February 18, 1992 and March 16, 1992. 7. North elevation of lobby, dated April 22, 1991. 8. Proposed Dumpster Relocation, dated April 21, 1992. Section 3 The Town Council finds that any deviation of the development standards from the underlying zone district provides benefits to the Town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. The development standards for Special Development District No. 2$ are approved by the Town Council as a part of the approved development plan as follows: A. SETBACKS: Setbacks shall be as designated on the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. B. HEIGHT: 8uiiding height, for a sloping roof, shall not exceed 48 feet from existing or finished grade, whichever is more restrictive; or for a flat or mansard roof, shall not exceed ~. 45 feet from existing ar finished grade, whichever Is more restrictive. C. ~ENSkTY: Development in SDD No. 28 shall be limited to a maximum of 3 dwelling units and 21 accommodation units, as designated on the floor plans set forth in Sectlan 2 of this Ordinance, and as follows: i . The Gross Residential Floor Area (GRI'A) shall be limited to a maximum of 14,117 sq. ft„ of which '7,335 sq. ft shall be dedicated to accommodation 2 ,~ ,' units, 5,041 sq. ft. shall be dedicated to dwelling units and 1,741 sq. ft. shad tae dedicated to excess common area, It should also be Hated that the provision for an additional 425 sq. ft. of GRFA, which is applicable to certain zone districts, does not apply to this Special Development District. 2. The applicant or his successors in interest agree to permanently restrict one off-site dwelling unit, (the secondary unit in a primarylsecondary residence located at 1184 Cabin Circiell_ot 2, Block 2, Vaii Valley First Filing, for use by employees of the Upper Eagle Valley (employee housing unit) In the following manner; a. The employee hausing unit shall be provided with a full kitchen (refrigerator, stove, sink, oven/microwave) and shaii Hat tae leased or rented for any period less than 30 consecutive days and shall be rented only to tenants who are full time employees in the Upper Eagle Valley. b. The Upper Eagle Valley snail be deemed to include the Core Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Eagle-Vail and Avon and their surrounding areas. c. A full-time employee Is a persan whn works an average of thirty hours per week. d. The applicant or his successors in interest shall file a declaration of covenants and restrictions with iha Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to insure the restrictions set forth herein shall run with the ,~ land. Said declaration shall not be amended or terminated without the writ#en approval of the Town of Vail. Subsequent to the effective date of this ordinance, no building permit shall be issued for the redevelopment of #his Special Development District No. 28 until said declaration of covenants and restrictions are executed and filed with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder. 3. The applicant or his. successors in interest agree to permanently restrict one on-site dwelling unit, lithe third floor dweliing unit in the Christiania t,odge} located at 356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village ., ~ ~ 3. ~ ~ p n, ti ~' ,..~ ,` First Filing, according to Section 17.2G.075 - Condominium Conversion, of the Town of Vail Zoning Cade. The applicant or his successors in interest shall file a declaration of covenants and restrictions with the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Tawn to insure the restrictions set forth herein shall run with the land. Said declaration shall not be amended or terminated without the written approval of the Town of Vail. Subsequent to the effective date of this ordinance, no building permit shall tae issued far the redevelopment of this Special Development District No. 2B until said declaration of covenants and restrictions are executed and filed with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder. D. SITE COVERAGE: The maximum allowable site coverage for Lot D shall not exceed 39°!° of the buildable lot size and shall be as designated on the development plans set forth In Section 2 of this Ordinance. E. LANDSCAPING: At least thirty-two percent {32°t°} of Lot D shall be landscaped and shall be as designated an the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. F. PARKING: Parking for SDD No. 28 shall be met as designated on the development plans set forth In Section 2 of this Ordinance. Section 4 The applicant or his successors in interest agrees to perform the following: 1. The applicant or his successors in interest shall obtain a revocable right-of-way permit from the Town in order to add the proposed landscaping at the entrance to the Lat P-3 parking area, as designated on the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance.. 4 2. The applicant nr his successors in interest has agreed to financially participate in the construction of a sidewalk along the west side of the Mili Creek Gourt Chute, from Hanson Ranch Road to West Gore Greek Drive, as designated in the Town's adopted 5treetscape Master Plan. Such financial contribution shall not exceed one third of the total cost of the sidewalk. ~. The applicant or his successors in interest has agreed that should any of the retocated evergreens not survive two growing seasons, such tree shall be replaced with an 8-iQ' evergreeri.`or~a one-to-one ratio. 4. If and when the Town of Vail or other party develops a parking/loading delivery facility on Parcels P-3 and t_ot J, Block 5-A, Vaii Village 5th Filing, the applicant or his successors in interest shall not remonstrate against the development of a parking loading facility as long as the amount of parking that the applicant currently has on parcel P-3, Block 5-A, Vail Village 5th filing, including either the right-of- way to the east or west, is incorporated into the parking/loading facility. The number of spaces shall not include valet parking. Section 5 Amendments to the approved development plan may be granted pursuant to Section 18.44 of the Municipal code of the Town of Vail. Section 6 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance fs for any reaspn held io be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 7' The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 5 ~ f .' 'rY~ Y ~: Section S The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed ar repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed ar superseded unless expressly stated herein. ~ ~ ! ~ ~~ ,. , . ~~ , Section 9 All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shat! not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance,. ar part thereof, theretofore repeaied. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this 7th day of Apri 1 , 1992. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the 21st day of Apri 1 , i 992, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town a# Vail, Colorado; in the Municipal Building of the Town. Margar A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: M,eau c~'. ~a~&w Marth S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED b.v title on1.y this 21st day f Rpri1 igg2, ' n Margaret A. Osterfass, Mayor ATTEST: It/1.an~iae.. ~'. lQ~2c.0u.,1 Martha S. Raecker, Town Cierk 6 ` • " ~ MEMC~NDUM - _ r 7 • TO: Planning and Environmental Commission --~ ~~- - , FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 1992 SUBJECT: A request for the establishment of a Special Development District at the Christiania at Vail, 356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vaii Village First Filing, and Lat P-3, Block 5-A, Vail Village Fifth Filing. Applicant: Paul Johnston Planner: Mike Mvflica i. 1NTRODUCTiON Pau! Johnston, owner and operator of the Christiania at Vaii, has filed a request for the establishment of a Special Development District, for his property located a# 35fi Hanson Ranch Road. The purpose far this 5DD establishment is to allow for the expansion and redevelopment of the existing Christiania Lodge. The Christiania at Vail has an existing, Town approved development plan. This development plan was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on April 8, 1991. This approval granted a setback variance in order to allow for the expansion of -the Christiania Lodge's lobby and a 44 sq. ft. expansion of GRFA (on the proposed fourth floor}, into the setback. This setback variance is valid until April 8, 1992. Subsequent to this PEC approval of the variance, the Design Review Board, on June 5, 1991, unanimously approved the final design for the Christiania redevelopment. This redevelopment included the expansion of the existing lobby, the addition of mechanical space beneath the lobby, and the addition of a new fourth #loor, which included two new dwelling units. f#. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant's redevelopment proposal generally includes the upgrade and renovation of the existing Christiania Lodge, as follows: • The addition of a new fourth floor on the existing structure, which would consist of two dwelling units. • A general reconfiguration of the existing first, second and third floors of the Lodge, by reconfiguring accommodation units, adding dwelling units as wall as common area. A total of 21 accommodation units and 3 dwelling units, comprising 14,117 sq. ft. of GRFA, is proposed. • The expansion of the existing Sarah's Bar, from `l74 sq. ft. to 1,171 sq. ft. in size (an increase of 397 sq. ft.}. • The construction of a garage which would provide two on-site covered parking spaces. The garage would be located at the southwest corner of the building. Additional GRFA would be located over the garage area, on floors two, three and four. The construction of 19 valet ( ce} parking spaces, to be located ori~ adjacent Parcel P-3, to the noThis parking area would be surfaced with asphalt, and would be landscaped around its perimeter. The restriction of one of the three dwelling units, according to the Condominium Conversion section of the zoning code. The provision of one off-site, permanently restricted employee housing unit. The construction of a walking path, along the east side of Mill Creek (this will require approval from Vail Associates, owner of the tract}. The existing split rail fence, located adjacent to MIII Creek, would be removed, as would the approximately 550 sq. ft. of asphalt area, currently used for parking and the trash dumpster. The relocation and enclosure of the trash dumpster, to the northwest comer of the Christiania property. Additional landscaping would be added on and adjacent to the Mill Creek stream tract {which is owned by Vail Associates} and adjacent to the recreation path. The screen fence located around the swimming pool would be relocated onto the Christiania Lodge's property, (it is currently on the stream tract}. Of the seven proposed fireplaces, six are proposed to be gas. The existing woodburning fireplace located in Sarah's Bar will remain woodburning. ill. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY A. May 11, 1987 -the Planning and Environmental Commission voted to approve density and setback variances in order to allow for the construction ofi additions to the Christiania Lodge. Subsequent to the 1987 PEC approval of the variance request, no construction has occurred. B. March 5, 1991 - a redevelopment proposal which did not require any variancelPEC approvals was reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board (DRB}. Under this redevelopment proposal, the applicant proposed to add a new fourth floor to the existing structure to accommodate 2 new dwelling units, to remodel the structure's interior, to construct a walking path along Mifl Creek, to screen the existing dumpster, to pave and landscape the eastern half of the northern parking lot (when ownership and rights to this lot are resolved), and to remove a portion of an existing asphalted area adjacent to the proposed Mill Creek walking path. C. April $, 1991 -the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously approved a setback variance for the Christiania Lodge in order to allow for the expansion of the Lodge's lobby and a 44 sq. ft. expansion of GRFA (on the proposed fourth floor}, into the front setback area. D. June 5, 1991 -the Design Review Board unanimously granted final design approval for the redevelopment of the Christiania Lodge, as approved by the PEC on April 8, 1991. 2 IV •JNING CONSIDERATIONS . . Zone District: Public Accommodation Site Area: 0.380 acres or 18,553 sq. ft. The following zoning analysis highlights the SDD's departures, from the PA zone district , by the use of bold type: Underlying Zoning iPAZ Existing protect 1991 Approval 1992 SDD A. Danslty {25 DUs per 9 DUs 2 DUs and 25 AUs 2 DUs and 14 AUs 3 DUs and 21 AUs .13.5 buildable acre: 1 DU . 2 = 14.5 DUs = 9 DUs DUs AUs) B. AU GRFA" NIA 6,720 sq, ft. 7,850 sq, ft. 7,335 sq. ft. DU GRFA" NIA 1,082 sq. ft. 4,453 sq. ft. 5,041 sq, ft. Excess Comrrtan NIA 145 sq. ft. 1,021 sq. ft. 1,741 sq, ft. G Total GRFA" (SO% of 19,242 sq. ft. 7,802 sq. ft. 13,324 sq. ft. 1x,117 sq. ft. the buildable site Brea} ($0%) (47%) (80%) (85%} D. Cortzmon Area {35% of 4,635 sq. ft. 4,780 sq. ft. 5,656 sq. ft. 6,376 sq, ft. the ailawable GRFA) (35%) (36%} (43%) {48%} E. Accessory (10% of 1,324 sq. ft. 774 sq. ft. 774 sq. ft. 1,171 sq. ft. constructed GRFA) (10%} (10%) (6%) (8%} 1=. Qftice NIA 72 sq. ft. (approved 197 sq, ft. 197 sq. ft. by conditional use in (approved by 1989) conditional use in 1989 } G. Gross Area*" NIA 13,428 sq. ft. 18,930 sq. ft. 20,574 sq. ft. H. Setbacks 20 ft. all sides North/Fra nt 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" East Side 0'-0" 0'-0" 0'-0" Wesf Side 1T-0" 1T-0" 1p'.p^ South/Hear 8'-6" (deck) 8'-fi" 8'-6" I. Site Coverage (55% of 9,104 sq. ft. 5,235 sq. ft. 5,738 sq. fi. 6,450 sq. it. site ?sea) (55%) (32%) (35%) (39%) J, Landscaping (30% of 4,956 sq. ft. 7,490 sq. ft. 5,943 sq, ft. 5,356 sq. ft. site area) (30%) {45%) {36%} (32%) K. Height 4t3 ft. sloping roof/ 36 ft. sloping 43 ft. flat 44 ft, flat 45 ft. flat roof L. parking Spaces Raqulred NIA 36 34 41 Spaces Required) NIA 33 33 33 Non-Coniorming"•• Spaces Provided N/A 3 3 25 * For comparison purposes, all GRFA calculations were completed using the Town's 1992 definition of GRFA. "" Gross area calculations include AU GRFA, DU GRFA, common, accessory, office and garage areas. "` S aces re uired/non-conformin are the " randfathered" p q g g parking spaces as discussed in Section V,C of this memo. 3 ' `, • ~. V. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CRITERIA. The criteria to be used to evaluate #his proposal are the 9 Special Development District (SDD} development standards set forth in the special development district chapter ofi the Zoning Code. The criteria are as follows: A. Design compatlbil[ty and sensltlvi#y to the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, Identity, character, visual Integrity and orientation. It is the staff's opinion that the proposed redevelopment of the Christiania Lodge wilt be compatible with the axis#ing land uses surrounding the project. We believe that the proposed mass and bulk for this structure is acceptable, given the existing footprint of the Christiania Lodge, and the adjacent Chateau Condominiums. The project would have a maximum height of 44 feet, which 1s just slightly under the maximum allowable height of the PA zone district. Additionally, the proposed height would also be within the acceptable limits as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan, which recommends that this property have a maximum height range of 3-4 stories in height (27-36 feet, excluding roof}. This project has been analyzed according to the proposed Frivolous Sals View Corridor. This view corridor was approved by the Town Council on first reading, on May 7, 1991, with the stipulation that anv areviously aporoved projects could be built, even though,they may encroach into f;he view corridor. At the time. of first reading, it was anticipated, that the Christiania redevelopment would encroach into this view corridor. Since the 1991 approval of the Christiania redevelopment, there have been some slight design modifications which would affect the proposed Frivolous Sals View Corridor. Changes to the roof configuration on the northwest corner of the Christiania Lodge would create an additional encroachment into the corridor. However, the northernmost portion of the building would be pulled out of the proposed view corridor. Overall, the staff believes the applicant's proposal is reasonable, given the fact that the Frivolous Sals View Corridor has not been formally adopted upon second reading. Although the proposed SDD would exceed the maximum allowable GRFA by 875 sq. ft., it should be noted that 1,741 sq. ft. of GRFA is directly attributable to "excess" common area. The common areas in the Lodge include the mechanical areas, the hallways, stairs, storage areas, lobby and hotel offices. !t should also be noted that the residential part of the GRFA, which constitutes 12,376 sq. ft., is actually under the maximum allowable GRFA, as designated in the PA zone district. Please refer to Exhibit A for a detailed breakdown of the proposed GRFA. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Under the proposed redevelopment scenario, the applicant will be reducing the overall density of the proposed project by one dwelling unit. This is in contrast with the existing project, which has a total of 14.5 dwelling units. In summarv, a total of three 4 • 1 dweAina units and twenty-one accommodation units are proaosed with this SDD. As indicated in Section IV(D) of this memorandum, the Vail Village Master Plan encourages the provision of short term, overnight hotel rooms (accommodation units}. The proposed Christiania SDD is in compliance with the definition of "Lodge", in which "the gross residential floor area devoted to accommodation units exceeds the gross residential floor area devoted to dwelling units." As further indicated in the attached Exhibit A, the GRFA devoted to accommodation units exceeds 59% of the total GRFA for the project. Because this SDD request exceeds the maximum allowable density for the PA zone district, the applicant has agreed to restrict the third floor dwelling unit according to Section 17.26.1775 -Condominium Conversion, of the Town's zoning code. This section of the code includes rental restrictions and generally provides that condominium units shall be included in the short term rental market for certain periods of time. Staff believes placing the rental restriction on only one of the three dwelling units is acceptable because the applicant is reducing the overall density of the project by one dweiling unit {versus the existing project), and the fact that the GRFA exceedance is due to the overage of common areas. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to provide one off-site, permanently restricted employee dwelling unit. This unit would be the secondary unit in a primarylsecondary residence owned by the applicant. The restricted employee unit will be located at 1184 Cabin Circle/Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Valley First Filing. Although this SDD proposal would provide four less accommodation units then the existing project (21 versus 25}, staff believes that when the Christiania Special Development District is reviewed in its entirety, the project meets the SDD criteria. There are public benefits, such as the employee restricted dwelling unit, the Mill Creek walking path, additional landscaping, two enclosed parking spaces, a paved parking area, etc., which should be considered. We believe the project provides a workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity as described above. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter ~ 8.52. This SDD proposal calls for the addition of a two-car garage, (to be located in the southwest comer of the proposed addition}, two surface parking spaces to be provided immediately north of the garage, and two surface parking spaces north of the lobby (on-site). Additionally, the applicant is proposing 19 valet (surface) parking spaces on the adjacent Lot P-3, north of Hanson Ranch Road (please see the attached site plan). The proposed parking area on Lot P-3 would be surfaced with asphalt, would include landscaping around its perimeter, and a retaining wall on the west side of the lot. With this SDD, the total number of proposed parking spaces would be 25. 5 Existina Use # Saaces Reauir~d Accommodation Units: (25 AUs) ~ 16.4 Dwelling Units: {2 DUs}= 4.0 Accessory (Sarah's t.ounge): 6.0 Realty Office: 0.3 Christian Chateau Townhomes: 9.q Sub-Total 35.7 Grandfathered Spaces -32.7 Grand Total 3.0* 1992 SDD # St~aces Required (21 AUs) = 15.6 (3 DUs} = 7.Q i3.5 0.8 9.0 40.9 -32.7 $.2.9.0 ,.. *The Town of Vail recognizes that the Christian€a Lodge has 3 existing parking spaces. These three parking spaces are located on the Christiania Lodge site and are considered legal, nonconforming spaces due to their location within the required front setback. In summary. this SDD reauires that a #atal of 6 new parkina spaces be provided on- site. The applicant is proposing a total of 25 parking spaces for the project, 22 of which are new. However, the proposed parking plan deviates from the parking requiremen#s of the PA zone district as follows: 1. The parking is not provided entirely on-site. 2. 75% of the required parking is not located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. 3. The on-site surface parking spaces would be located within the front setback area. The Christiania is technically 32.7 parking spaces short, as required per the zoNng code. However, the proposed SDD will meet the incremental increase of required parking with the P-3 parking lot, the on-site valet parking and the proposed garage. Historically, the Christiania has parked on portions of the property to the north (Lot J), however, this arrangement has not been officially recognized by the Town. Given the siting of the existing Christiania Lodge, and the fact that the applicant has a perpetual easement to park on the adjacent l..ot P-3, staff believes the applicant's proposed parking scheme is acceptable, and will be an improvement aver the existing parking configuration. Also, according to Section 18.52.060 of the Town's Zoning Code, "the Town Council may permit off-site or jointly used parking facilities if located within three hundred feet of the use served". This provision only applies to unenclosed parking spaces. The staff believes it is appropriate to recognize that the P-3 parking is formally associated with the project. 6 l.oadirlg: The existing Christiania Lodge has a requirement for one loading berth. No loading berths are currently provided for the Lodge, and the loading requirement is considered "grandfathered". The proposed redevelopment of the Lodge does not increase the loading non-conformity, as the new proposal also has a requirement for one loading berth. The proposed parking scheme, on the adjacent Lot P-3, does require that the entry to the parking area be relocated approximately ~5 feat to the east. This relocated entry does provide for safer ingress and egress out of Lot P-3, and aiso allows for the safer passage of vehicles utilizing the Mill Creek Court "chute". However, this relocated entry would remove one of the existing public loading and delivery spaces along Hanson Ranch Road. The loss of one public loadingldelivery space in the Village Core is not a positive change and it is a major concern to the staff, however, we acknowledge that the applicant does have a right to safely access Lot P-3. To mitigate the loss of the one loadingldelivery space, the applicant will provide a loadingldelivery berth on-site {adjacent to the dumpster), for use by the Christiania. D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town po[Icies and Urban Design Plans. It is staff's opinion that the proposed redevelopment meets the goals and objectives of the Vail Village Master Plan. The Master Pian emphasizes the upgrading of lodges, the improvement of the pedestrian experience, as well as the enhancement of open space. This proposal supports the Master Plan's objectives by the addition of 7 new accommodation units {versus the 1991 approval) and by improving and expanding the existing lobby and bar areas, while generally complying with the Town's site development standards, except as noted in the memo. Additionally, the proposed Mill Creek pedestrian path will enhance open space for use by the public. The following is a list of the Vail Village Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies which relate to this project: GOAL #t - ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING THE UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY. 1.2 Objective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. 1.3 Objective: Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town. 7 ~~' .~ 1.3.1 Objective: Public improvements shall be developed with the participation of the priva#e sector working with the Town. GOAt_ #2 - T4 1=0STER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE YEAR-AROUND ECONOMIC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FDR THE VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. 2,3 Obiec#ive: Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations. 2.3.1 Policy: The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. 2.4.2 Policy: Activity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both the guest and the community shad be encouraged. 2.5 Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. 2.6 Objective: Encourage the development ofi af#ordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector. 2.6.1 POIICy: Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning. 2.6.2 Policy: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the focal work force. GOAL #3 - TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIORITY THE ENHANCEMENT 01= THE WALKING EXPERIENCE THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE. 3.i Objective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. 8 3.4 Obiective5: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access. GOAL #4 _ TO PRESERVE EXISTING OPEN SPACE AREAS AND EXPAND GREENSPACE OPPORTUNITIES. The Vail Village Master Pian sub-area concepts which directly relates to this redevelopment proposal are Concepts No. 3-8, Miil Creek Streamwaik, and Concept No. 7-1, ChristianiaNA Study Area: #3-8 Miil Creek Streamwalk A walking only path along Mill Creek between Pirate Ship Park and Gore Creek, further completing the pedestrian network and providing public access to the creek. Specific design and location shalt be sensitive to adjacent uses and the creek environment. #7-1 ChristianiaNA Studv Area Presently zoned for lodging, this parcel currently provides parking for the Christiania Lodge and Vail Associates. Issues to be addressed in the development of this property include covenan#s restricting the use of this property to parking, accommodation of existing parking as well as demand created by new development and a formally adopted view corridor, looking toward the Gore Range. Public purpose uses that may be appropriate for this site include parklopen space andlor a central loading and delivery facility for the Village core. The staff believes that the applicant's proposal to utilize Lot P-3 for surface parking will nat prohibit the potential future use of the Lot P-3 as discussed above in the Master Plan. The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan addresses this proposal through Sub-Area Concept No. 8: "Mill Greek walking path, west side Mill Creek. Path completes linkage from pirate ship and mountain path to Gore Creek Drive." The Vail Village Master Plan and The Urban Design Guide Plan both call for the construction of a pedestrian path connection between the bike path and Hanson Ranch Road. The addition of a foot path would be a positive improvement to the pedestrian experience in the Village area. Even though the Urban Design Guide Plan ca11s for the path to be located on the west side of Miil Creek, staff believes that the east side provides a more attractive walking experience. The west side of the creek has a trash room for Cyrano's, as wet! as several utility boxes, which make it an unpleasant area to walk through. 9 In further support of the above sub-area concepts, the applicant has committed #o remove approximately 55o sq. ft. of asphalt area adjacent to Mill Greek. This paved area, which is currently used by the Christiania far parking and dumpster storage, is located on Vail Associates and Christiania owned property. This proposal was reviewed according to the recently adopted Streetscape Master Plan. There are no specific streetscape concepts which apply to this site, however, the Plan does propose a sidewalk on the west side of the Mill Creek Court Chute. It is the staff's position that the installation of this sidewalk should not be a requirement of the Christiania redevelopment as we believe the SDD will not directly impact the pedestrian movements in this area. ~. tdentlftcatlon and mitigation of natural andlor geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district Is proposed. There are no natural andlor geologic hazards which would affect this property andlor redeveiopment proposal. The project is also located out of the established 1 DD-year floodplain. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The existing front setback is 15 feet due to the encroachment of the northwest corner of the Lodge. Currently, the west side setback is 17 feet due to an encroachment of the southwest corner of the building into the 2D-fao# setback. The existing rear setback is 8'-6", as the existing Sarah's deck projects 11'-6" into the 2D-foot rear setback {see attached site plan}. An existing legal, non-conforming east side setback of zero feet results from the Christiania's connection to the Chateau condominiums. sy adding a' new fourth floor, 44 square feet of additional GRFA will be added into the side setback. At the tightest point, the west setback will be reduced from the existing 17 feet, down to 1D'-0", with the addition of the two-car garage. The second and third floors (GRFA) would encraaeh 4'-6" into the setback and the fourth floor {GRFA) would encroach 2'- 9" into the setback. Because the zoning code and the Vaii Village Master Plan bath encourage the construction of covered parking, and the fact that this portion of the site is very heavily screened from adjacent properties, staff is able to support the applicant's request to further encroach into the required 2D-faot setback. G. A clrculatlon system designed for Loth vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traff(c clrculatlon. The proposed Christiania redeveiopment will have a minimal impact on the existing vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems adjacent to the Christiania Lodge property. The proposed parking scheme, on the adjacen# Lot P-3, does require that the entry to the parking area be relocated approximately 25 feet to the east, This relocated entry does provide for safer ingress and egress out of Lot P-3, and also 10 ~ . Y allows for the safer passage of vehicles utilizing the Mifl Creek Court "chute". However, this relocated entry would remove one of the existing loading and delivery spaces along Hanson Ranch Road. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. As indica#ed on the attached site plan, there are some existing large, mature evergreens located very close to the existing Lodge. The redevelopment proposal calls for the removal, and relocation, of nine of these large evergreen #rees. The applicant has proposed to add nine new aspens (3" caliper) adjacent to the Mif! Creek stream tract (to screen the on-site parking) and near the recreation path. Six new aspens (3" cafiper~ wilt be added adjacent to the front, or north, entry to the Lodge. To furthet open up the Milf Creek stream tract, the applicant has agreed to remove the existing spi€t rail fence which is located upon the Vail Associates' owned stream tract. The wood screen fence around the swiraming pool will be relocated upon the Lodge's property, as it is currently located upon the stream tract (Tract E). The staff feels that the landscaping design is positive because of the applicant's proposal to relocate aU nine of the large evergreens and to add the 15 new aspens on site. The relocated evergreens would be placed in the adjacent stream tract, and this relocation effort would be coordinated with the Town Landscape Architect and Vail Associates. Should these relocated evergreens not survive two growing seasons, the applicant has agreed to replace any dead or dying tree with an 8-10' evergreen. Additional off-site landscaping will be added around the perimeter of Lot P-3. This landscaping would consist of 17 new evergreens (6-8' in height}, and 10 Potentilfa shrubs along the base of the proposed retaining wall (on the Mill Creek Court Chute). (According to the zoning code, the off-site landscaping can not be included in the required landscaping.} I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient refationshfp throughout the development of the special development district. The applicant has proposed that the SDD redevelopment plan for the Christiania Lodge be completed at one time. No phasing plan is proposed. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION We believe that the Christiania redevelopment meets the criteria for the establishment of a SDD, as discussed above. The staff recommendation for the proposed establishment of a Special Development District for the Christiania Lodge is for approval. The applicant has incorporated the following elements into the proposed development plan: 11 .y + ~ •. 1. The proposed dwetling unit, to be located an the third floor of the Lodge, will be restricted~according to Section 17.28.075 -Condominium Conversion, of the Towr1 of Vail Zoning Code. 2. One employee dwelling unit, which shall be provided with a fuA kitchen (refrigerator, stove, sink, oven or microwave), will be permanently restricted as an employee dwelling unit, per Section 18.13.Q80(B)(10)(b-d) of the Town of Vail Zoning Code, prior to the Town's issuance of any building permits for this redevelopment. 8. The applicant will obtain a revocable right-af-way permit from the Town in order to add the proposed landscaping at the entrance to the Lot P-3 parking area. 4. Prior to the Town's issuance of any building permits for this redevelopment, the Town Engineer must grant final approval for the P-3 parking design. The Town Engineer is concerned with the design of the proposed re#aining wall adjacent to the Miii Creek Court "Chute". A curb and gutter section may be necessary to accommodate drainage in this area. 5. The applicant has agreed that should any of the relocated evergreens not survive two growing seasons, such tree. shah, be replaced with an 8-10' evergreen on a one-to-one ratio. ..~ 12 r. ` . ~• Exhibit A GRFA and Parking Required GRFA Parkirta 1. First Level 6 AUs = 1,932 sq. ft. = 4.332 Offioe (197 sq. ft./250} = 0.788 2. Second Level 7 AUs - 2,431 sq. ft. T 5.173 Sarah's Bar (1,020/15/8} - 8.5 3. Third Level 8 AUs - 2,972 sq. ft. = 6.146 1 DU - 551 sq. ft. = 2.0 4. Fourth level 2 DUs - 4,490 sq. ft. = 5.000 5. Christian Chateau Townhomes = 9.000 Total GRFA: 12,376 sq. #t. = 40.939 - 32.70 (Grandfathered spaces] 8.239 - 9 Required spaces Total GRFA: 12,376 sq. ft. Excess Common Area: + 1,741 sq. ft. Grand Total: 14,117 sq. ft. Total Density: 21 AUs and 3 DUs AU GRFA = 7,335 sq. ft., or 59% of the total GRFA DU GRFA = 5,041 sq. ft., or 41% of the total GRFA 13 r w. • i s.w c- ~ ~ Exh(bit B " Common Area First Level = 3,104 sq. ft. Second Level ~ 1,785 sq. ft. Third Leve( - 727 sq. ft. Fourth Level - 760 sp. ft Total: 6,376 sq. ft. Allowable GRFA = 13,242 sq. #t. x .35 X35%} 4,635 sq. ft. 6,376 sq. ft. - 4.635 s4. ft. 1,741 sq. ft. -excess common (added to GRFA} 14 + f PROOF OF PUBIICAT~ON STATE Of COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE 3 ~~ ALLAN ICNQK do solemnly swear that I am the ~Publieher ~. of TtiE VAIL TRAIL; that the same is a weakly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle. State of Colorado, and has a general circulotlon therein: that Bald newspaper has been published continuously and uninferrupfedly In sold County of Eag€e fora rind of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next pflor to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advefflsemenf; that said newspaper has been admitted io the United States malls as second class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3,1879, or any amendmenis thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly quoit led for publishing legal notices and adverflsernentsWithin the meaning of the Paws of the State of Colorado. Thal the annexed legs! notice or adverfisernent was published in the regular and entire issue of ovary number of sold weekly newspaper for the period of ~1L7~ consecutive Inserfians: and that the tlrsf publicaflon of Bald not#ce was in the issueof Bald newspaper dated ~ ~_ ~~~ AO. 19~~ and that the Iasi publication of sold notice was In the Issue of sold newspaper dated f~~~It~ ~D ~ AD. 79 ~~r~:.._ i In wit ss whereof I hctvri hereunto sal my hand thi• l~ day of -(dl~r AD.19.~ f t~ Subscribed and swan to before me. a notary publ/i~c, n~ and for my of Eagle. State of Colorado, this ~~~ day of ~/ A.D: 19 ~~~ MY commission expires ll -~~ -y3 PaewnY,p 8bD No. 28 ahd W met Ms desl6• nrexd an ~a r plan. sM ~h F,Seo-, . trop 2 d Ihk C 1 ... 8ECT10N4. Coannvh~nrrnn .. .11i~ a ~ h4 n .. M inkrraM ; praex b pertarm the falowtrp: . t. The applkxd a k a .. M IdNeet. abet abralrt a riph,blwery pami trap' tM Town k, ardor b add the 1 ke,dxoxP by p~arMrsnos to the ld PaP~ spa, e+ 1 d8aasaltl0a+ ad lapr Yt 2 d tlrk btdlnrrea.... 2.7ir appiasnt a Nor xrrooeeeoro H kNrMt' TrM a0roed b Nnurolaly Mr tIN ear gr,rctlsn d • xMaraak abn6 M wep atria d 1M ~~~ MM Creek Gwrt Chute, tram Haman iirorar Road b Wyt Qore Creek brNa, ore durpntled H ; rite Trrwn'e +dopted riaeaNOr4e Maur Plan. 3• Such thandd aodr6Nlsn ehaM pd exceed one third d tla kcal ooa d tM xldawallr.' :°. S. The egttbad a Ne arooeaeon in kRereat , ' hq a0rsad 1heR etrouM wry d the telooxlad 'not wrriw h+o aow4y'aaasorr, . such tree ehaM W roplaoed wkh an B•1D' aflYpnlia-sae tatk.v ?~: !t!' / ~mayioW y tobd p~isnw_dio sedkn SeAOrib rr. 9C-CTION e• d the, aMnd Yal.`.~a'-~ ,. ~ Many pM, xeaioR aubeedlon, olwee or phrae a thl. adinerroa 1. [ar any reason hew b M iwaid, such daahbn shah red efha the wOdky d Me rerraNka oortlarra d Ihk adiranoe; and the Town Caundl hereby deoierro h wouw haw paved thk ordkmroe. ~. ~~ .,pad, srclbn. arbwatlun,dthileetlltiliNyate. phnretlrered,' or more pads, eeelloir. evbectlar, aedergM,, r aeueM IX Pf++~ be ded4rod bw.lw. , SECTION 7. - The Town Courcrt ha+tM IYda, detewanes prapera rhe~h.anb. ud~ h ww~ileoe ~ th~i Town a Vat and th. tarabtrru dwed..:,,~;_:; SECTION e. - ~ 'd TM repeal a the raped and . any ... d tlro Veil Munldpel Cods M prarwed h thk ard4wwe shtl trot aNsct esy dOM wAriclt bra aaorrred, try duly krpose0.~ anY vidalon tlrtl aaauned Pbr b tlw effadhr dab, Mred, app PrM~ .. ~ti' nor ru,y' a1trM aallalr IX . ~ „ M ... J Vrrder or bl' Vlrtrre d rile , ... , IX rePeald and reenacted.: ~~~e.rep•ai d ~ a anik er• tarebY eMt par rwM asy Pro'rk dirawe pr.vioa.y ropexld ar esgrsdd rsr- weECt~ibN9."r.d•!~r1r!.~'~b`sr~:~~:~ °,~ I Atr byraw~.':otd~ra~~•ra-dlutloni-and, prdinanoee, ~ or Petra Ifierear. faconaHlent. {»rewkh aro b Nre pried tidy d such Thle repeals ahM red be aorr~ rtnred b mdee cry byhw, ~adat. rMddion ar, RO~Dla1CE~D, RADON F~BT RE~Aa~rNb,; APPRPYEb AHD OgOdEeRyED~PU8t.18HED . pcbto Marlrre xhxt held Mrea+~m~ Mae ]let day d APA: l062 a MO ropuYr'rmdkr0 d the Tam Looter d tlr- Tewm d Vsd€: CrMoerb, In. Ma Munklpal Buldig d the Town. ~ - .. - ,r ;x ".17 ! f i?'. ~ ~ t TOWN pF YAA:. 4..!.t rrK fe:MapeeN~A.,,.•flaM~~aeeexrr. ATTEeTr, 2;,,ri.!~~ ;t , I : vE, Tam Gede'- r$ ".:. PutAMktred F:Tlr Yat Tnl, ~ E2irz#r "', on April iC,1e03 1;tti3~ ~v. ~, .. ,:...V~. , . .. ~ t. .~ ,,,,«:Public Notice" . earw. of /NN2 AN ORDINANCE PRDVIDMIO FOR THE ES- TASLISHMENT~OF BPECW. pEVELOPMENi DI87R1CT Nb, 2B,'CHRISTIANIA AT PAIL; ADOPTMVQ A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SPE- CW: DEVELOPMENT blsTRrCT N0, 2t N AG CbpbANCE WITH CFIAPTEq~1&4D OF T1~E YAIL Ml1NICIPAL CODE ANO BEn1ND FORTH DETAlL81N REGARD THERETO:''r ' ~ ' ' ~ ' WHEREAS, Phapler' 16.40 Of rh• Vall Munbkal Cods tultgdxe. tlpaakd [ Dhlrida wkNn Mre Taa,t b ord.r b enaaure6+ Msxiritly it the . d turd; and WHEREAS, epplloMhn Inn been pads r« ~, SpetFM D+yalnprrud Diatda appakal tar a ar- ' de.aeiM NBlodc 2,~Vat Vinge~ht FiinO. end Ld Pte, Bbok SA, YaN Vtreps FRh WHEREAS, In aacordanae whh Becton ,&8e.74D, ttr Plannkp and Errvrrerrrrn,al Car>- mlvebn held s pubis hearkq an the ; .; -' SDD, and Aea erkadeed a l.,:an ra eppreval to the Tam Counoi; and WHEREAB, aA rr11oM M roquirod by Section 18.66AB0 hew been sent b the anPraprleis parks: end WHEREAS. dro Taan OovncO hM hew . pWta headrp M required by CMptar 78.66 d the Yad Municipal Cods. NOW. THEREFORE. DE R ORDAMED BY THE TOWN COl1h1CIL OF THE TIxYN OF YAIL, COLDRADOTHA7:: +. ,, ` . .. SECTION 7. lha raven Leaner Nrd. ttrt d the pnfadurM fa t3pedel C. DMdda ti Chapter ,6.4D d the Manielpxl c d. a ab ra+a d v.i haw been [ally aatYtled. 8ECTION 2, The Town Coundl firda that the d .' M pkn for $padel Dw+ekpmad DMrlri No. 2A mee7x each d the WridaNa act! [edh it 8ecibn ie.4D.oeo d the Munkipal Code d rite Tam d ; Val ar derrrtxrtralM mst akhar ens or mar. d them k not a thr ^ prwakeJ eohnbn eamklad with .~ prrb8e Ilwareat iru been ardrlawd. h aooordanos wiM lleoNon iB,W.dID, the dP 7 pion roe 9lraaal C ~.. ~., Dtatrlat No. 2B k .. TM d ~ ~ t pkn N ,. .. 1 d trace Piers tWrrtlMsd h!f Pkros, tisperbw0 a 8pweh .... aeM oai- eyh d tM IdawhO deaurrranh:.~ . . ,. 8hax1 Fk. A7, riled January Tl, 16D2 and rrrMed Maroh 10. 1tp2 {ally plant, ' 2 91teN Nos. AAAa deeed Jarwray 27, 16e2 std rrdMd Marsh ,a 1062 QYsr, faaad,lhYd and fourth Moor pMrt. ~. . x SMd Nor Act a.ud Jnway 27,1002 hoar ~41'8hea Nor. AT•Ati, datW Jamlup 27, lee2 and revlaed March ,a t062 (North, Bou11r. East end wee alsraMomf. ' -5. Rhea! r1o. 1.1 da4d Janrrry 27, i1rD2 and roxked Maroh a and Mtadi:la 1Yex p.a.o.p. P &1•rnkYy Pkn tai Lai P.9. ds1.d F.bnwy e. 19-R wrd rwwa Fahruvy 70. 1tii0! and Mardr 7. Narrh OraMxtlan o) kklry. dried AWti722. 1001. .sECiroN a : . ~7lw Town Counot Nrde NW any :. d . the d. . auMrda tram tlr uederykr0 sane dNVld .. ! benarta b the Tam dur - orRrwlph M,• adwr+e atleae d .ear derferbn. ' ~. TM eve .~ . tai 8lrsdal Da.ekP•.i -mad Dktricl Nor: 26~an ... . 1 W nw Tam ~ Council M a pert d q»;_ .. dNalgxrrd ; . plan Mi0A0wa:.._.,.,..; .,/,_-'~t.~~t.~. •`~-.'C"t :, A. SETBArJ(S: - ~ ~:. . Selbaoka shall b~•u•dMlgne4ad on rhs~ ..r......r /.rrh ti 6aaien 2 d rho tC.' ` 0. I ' Buy +r: Ydrlaii urd ~ j and efieN pal art.: tr. [Yihhsd~ Orode, . ' e br.a NM a nurr~ het ham xetfetlrt0 I tr7ara ..:. .. ... u .. ~~ In aurnrw,. d~etar0 M 1nAed b ; . w mulrrarm d:! dwalkle rxlL,ard 71 rraoon- unh-, a dMwnatd on tla Nose Plana ~' aM kr31 k Badiort >4 1hk 0, ~ •nd M QnoM1gMHenlW~Flow~lLrar {(iF~At r~ ~ ihaA t» imhd b ^ rtrakrxan d 14,117.x4 h. d ;,:wlJoh.~fS3~ 6 w.11..1r!al+i»,d:didtlke b emom'n, ' :~ ~ modatlarr Orrllxr.a041 q. R LFIhT tae ...'-.. I b .. dwatlnp Wrte hfd:174t~eq. ik abet b ddladed ~~ ' b erroeM . , r.a.e alrarw eke b nabd :~ titer Ma.prorkigi.lae~an addNorrri 425 s4 ti d _ .- ORFA, =which. k~;applkabra:r0 aarredm xerro '~' dlNdde, doss not apply b Mde BpeaLl Deeekp '-~ rnxd Pieria. °~ ,.: ,~ ..,: ,`._' ' °r--2 TM applkxurt'tM'Ne trlooeeMM In Interest'' ~ ~ pree b : !y teahld one abate dwetiq 1 unR {Mrs day !~ iri °a° rMNanw'ke~lxd et ire/.- ~ $ k Bbdc 2 V~ ~ ~ YIM for tae bY' 7~~`- a. The empby~a fiaa:fns unM aha11 bark prarked wM ii'1ut NMdar Tro +law•~! ~. airi~ wxn' .. ] and shaA red be kneed w... rwwad is arry~peddt tee it+an.9D aameaA3w,. :. idN 9nr ~ ~ rn~Mu ~ Esds YMap. i "~. h The UPpir Ea0laYatky ahM W deemed b . i Include the bwe alby Mfntum, Red CIIH, ; '', EpMNalaadAvonrdlMFaunandkgarsas:.: aATulilYna ~kapeleatrtMw!latk~.j ~ eat awrepe d MrMy haaa pis irexk+ :.F? V, r h _.+: d: Tit xpplkad ar, tie aroaaxxare h ld+reM . - ehaA rl4 a . ~d .. ird rakrlo-'~: . tbrs ~ Clnk-a~~tie T~ ~1ar~Mta'~ ' teridt d tlra'Town b fnxun the raMrkliorM eat., '~ ,~ fndfi herah+erral nor srth 9ra hrd, cold risotto-, . ' ' ~ tlar attar rot Ue anaerded a I wthorR' I Nre rvrtlen epptovM d tla :Town d Vat. litbae• ' gt,snl b Ne,dharlre dab d rhla .: , no ' gtrtdYp perm tdaA bs Isaud la the ' - mad d MJe ~ t : pleVfel No. 28 ' teat grid , d oownenb and rsatrta 8err w exaorAid ad Yad whfithe Ee61e Cam• h Cork aeM Fleoonlsr7 ~;~,3*. •'y' „ 0. 7M eppNoarl a<. lie woaesaon N kMrast - '"prat b . rwhid one orHti dwethp ' ' unit,ltM tfihd Near dwwrn0 udt rn the CMAgWrk ~a~ laaatsd at 3Ge Fieltaon F1arxlr Roedll.a . D, bbak~2, YrR VWQs Fhk FN,ry, :. ~.~ b ' 8edianl7JEe.676dt. ::" ~. •. d ' tM Tarn d Vet 7anlnp L1ba1a:11r eppMcarx w h{e suooeMaa In inlereM aM11As a dedratlcn d aowawdx ud iratrktlora tsMh dro Cledt and Rsaadw d Eeda Pau~~ryy M a lam aMyowd M ' the Town AMarnsl! ia' •ia beneM d,da Tam b Oruro tla W bah heroin aiaA rem.:, . dad w ~I~,withaw 11;e w~ribrt~.p~Play~d IM.Torm'Cf VaL.8ubdsqusnl'm~IM aNeake . dateafthYo~nos.;noWidineporrrA.aheNbs,: {Hued for ~ths d Mrl!- . C ~. Dldria No. 2a udt aald dsdwar tbn a{ :. ..red rMMMbta w aaaauled sad tiled-with tM EaeM County„Clerlt~,urd P. 811E GOYERAt3E: The maxYrum atararbk aSb .. .. for Lot b ehdl net exceed 39X d 1M bulMabk kA ske ' end shat be M deefOrrgbd On MIO ! 0 . l plain sd }aM In 8ao0on 2 d tlde Ordinance. : E. UWDSCAPUx4: ' At kard thidytwo perar'A t~1 d Ld A xheN . t>e' . . ! card shall be M daa~ntled on tlN '~ d. .. 1 a!•n!..k,io~rlh,tn•lieabn,2 d Ihk Ordinsnoa: ..- .~ .. ,- .. ~'8T r , ~ao~ o~ PuaucAnaN STATE OF COLORADO ) )) S9, coulvTy of EArLr: ni,T~tJr} xrrox I. do solerTtnSy swear that I am the _ Pub? iehe r _ of THE VAIL TRAIL: that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, In wttolo a In part and published !n ttte County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and has a gonoral clrculatlon therein; that said nouvspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly In said County of Eagle for o rind of more than fifty-Ewa consecutive weeks npXt prior fin the first publication of the annexed legal notice or odvortlsomQnt; shot Bald newspaper has boon admitted to the United States malls as s4TCnrid class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weakly newspaper duly qualified far putalishing legal notices and adverllserT7entswilhin the meaning of the laws at tlx~ Stale of Colorado. That the Annexed legal notice ar advertisement was published in the regular and entire Issue of ©very number of sold weekly newspaper for the period of 11t1~ consecutive Insertions; and that t e firs!t pu6[icoiion of sold notlco was in the Issue of sold newspaper tlatt3d -____~7/ 2~ AD. 19~_ and that the last puhllcnnatlon lot sold notice was in the issue of sold newspaper dated ftj~Y s ! 21~' IL D. 14 9Z In wktnle},ss whereof I have hereunto sat my hand this f~~f day of /~~' PLD.14~~ -- Subscribed find swam to before me, a notary pub~~li77ci __ red for?he C my of Eagle State of Colorado, this _~~~ _day o} r_Lfl6r1~~ AD. 19 ~~ My Cammiss3on 9Xpkes _-_-__1~~G„'L' ` ~ _ F. FARHINO: Parkhg for 90D No. 28 abet Ha met .+ dealg- naiad on 7ha , . Pieria net fglh Rr Sea IIOn 2 d Mk OrdlnarWe. , S£GTK7N 1. ~. The o0P8oan1 a hla s ... ... ~ to intsreat egrsae tc perlam the IoNowhY: 1. The epplfoant a hN aucassaon to iraereol [hest obledn a revocable dgM-d-vray parmR Iran the Town in ceder to odd the , .; . kmdwep. irp tl She anaanae 10 the Ld P3 paddng arse, ea dealpnalsd m the dev . ~. - Antes ed }onl+ b Sed3an 2 d Ihie ardlnsrws, 2, The applicant a hie evooeeage In Idarea! has agreed 1o Finandaly partldpate In IM ~~~- elrudlon d a sidawak ehn9 the weal Bide d Ihs ' MNI Creek Court Chute, Irene Han+m Fiandt Road to Wxl bore Crank Drive, as designated let ' the Tawn'i Adopted Slreelaoape Meets[ Plan, SucF flnehdal amin'bt4bn Attll not exceed one lhkd d the idol coal d tM aidewaw. . - 3. The epplioanl er Ns n---..-. ~ let IdneM has agreed thtl altavld any d itr roloctled . avergnsm not ourvFn two gowh9 eeesme, wok tree ehel4 be replaced whfi ^n 8.10' everprsen m e onrlod» rdb. t. M and wMn the Taws d VaN d dher party ', devebpo a Parkhp4oadlrg delNary IstllRy m Perceb P•3 end Ld J, BLodt 6A Val Veiape 51h Fi7ng, the eppNaent a hb altaceeoors h idereet ohW red rammshtle agaktat the devabpment d ' a pauitktgiOadingladUry Y lor+9 a+ the arroud d• pe,kkg that Iha appNcarN cuaenlly hoe On pared P.3, Sbdt EA, Vet Yi7aga 6th Flog, ~Inctuding ' eRher IM dgMd•waY to the Beat d went, w in• onrpgtled Into the parktnWoadhB raoiiY, The nurnbsr d+PacM ahd red iaalude vsbt patkhg. SECTION 6. Amendmemo to qu : ,• . 1 developnsrd Alen rtteY ba 9reded Pursuant to Sedion 18A0 d the Munldpal Cade d Bra Tartu d Yet. 8EC71ON S. ' i~' tl anY pen, eertlan, wbsad'gn, Ndarge, ol«rse or Phraaa d Ihie gdlnwree N tar arN ream hole to b irvaid, audh dsdabn areal nq ailed the valMRy d the nmeNEng portbne d Ihie ' eMinartas, and the Town Coundl hereby declevee h would have passed this gdinMte, and arch . pal. tbdion, eubsadkm, sentence, oFnuae q phms Iiroranr, regudbsa d lhs fed dad anY Ores - ~ amore parts, esclions, eubasdkna, ~ ~ , douses a pkaoao he dadved Imrafid. 9ECT1[x•I7. The Town Caundl Mreby Yssas, dNSrminee and daolares Ihat this mlinarros h recwsary end proper ter IM heahh, atlely and weMare d the Town d Vall artd the hhaWlerda Ilrsred. S£CTIgJ a TM rq»ek d tM repeal and rssnadmenl d any pad+icn d !M Vail Municipal Code m provided h Ihb ordhanw shah rtol affect sny dqM which hoe aowued, any duty krpased ery vlclsllal that aoWrred prior fa the e3edive date hared, any pr0eeudion -. - 1, nor cry dhar adlan ar pnxwedlrg ae ,. ~ ~ ~ .. . 'under a by vFrtus d the prevbim repeabd q repeabd end reanadad. The repeal Or any provhton dkraneeepsvbusy rep ~ ~beupersaded un- ' ~9ECigfi9~~~~ ' An bylaws, Orden, raaoiullone and mdlnenau, Or pane }bend, Inoonsltlenl herawhh e+e repealed to 1M eAed tuts d audr lareonolafanay, Th1a repealer a1xd1 red be om- olltrad 1o nsvW ant' br{arr, odor, rMOlutlon a adirwros, a pert [hared. tharddOn repealed. INTR000CE0, READ ON FIriBT READING, APPROYE4 AND ORDERED PUBLISHED . CNCE iN FULL Ihb 7th day d AAA, 1992. A panto headng shat W haid harem an the 21st daY d ApA, 7892 tl IM regular meadnnpp d tM ' Tam Cavndl d the Town d VaR Cdorecb h the Munbpai l9viHinq d 1M Town. TOWN OF PAIL Margaret A. OslsAop Mayq ATT•:sT; ' - Marsha 9. Rasdtq' ' Town CMk ; 1NTAODUCEO, READ AND APPROVED ON 9ECON0 AfiADINQ AND Op0EAE0 ' PUBLISHED CNCE N4 FI/LL Ihb 27e1 day d APrN. 1982. TOWN OF PAIL Margeros 0. Dalerlass Mayor ATTEST: MenM B. Beadle[ Puhthhed 3n TM Yell T'ttll~ Clerk m Apra 21, 1892 - . ~',~ :.:.Public Notice ~• r ,~ , r '- "> oRDxeA4ice riD, s .,. ' 8«Me of 7982 . . AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE E9• TASLIBH#AENT CF SPECIAL OEYELOPMENT ' DISTRICT NO. 2B, CHRI9TIANIA AT VAIL; ' ADOPTINb A OEYELOPMENi PLAN FOR 9PE- CIAL DEV£LOPMEN7 0LRTRICT NO, 2B IN At>:~ CORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE" YAtL MUNICIPAL CODE AND SETTiFNi FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THEpETO.•' r~ ' ' • ~.' WHEREAS, Cheplsr 18.10 al the Vall Municipal Cade aWhodzea Spacial Oarslganerd blstrido wkNn the Town [n gds[ to anoourpe natsiity h the devalopnren} d land; and wHERI'eA& eppliotlbn n.. [aeon made icr SpeoW D. -~.. 1 bblrld aP_pravet Tq-a car- } ~~ lak+ parcel d property ~whhh the Town, k+otlM' u Ld D, Sicck 2, Yail Yilags Fit ~ FiRng~ard Lot P.7,-SL.ock bA. Vdl Niage FDh FINng; and - ~ k:' WHEREAS, [n aaoordenos with Seelbn EB.fi8.140, the (Mannhg and EnvkoNnenlal Cmr mi+sbn heW a pWRe hearing m the : ,,... 500, end hoe aubmidad a - :,..,.nion ra approva4 to the Town CouncA; and WHEREAS, aR notices as rerp:ired tr] Section 1B.BB.OBO have been aenl to the epproprlale parties; ono WHEREAS, the Tam CouncU hm hdd a pdUw hserlrg ea required Iry Ghepla IB.BB d the VaN Munkipel Cede. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAFfE6 f1Y THE TOWN CDUNGIL OF THE TOWN OF PAIL, COLORADO THA7: SECTiI]hi i. - The Twm CouncN tlyds thtl ay the praoeduree for Spedal 0evebpnted Ofslrkhn Chapter 18,40 d the Mun~pei Cade d the Taws d Yai have been rally aafbiied. SFGTtON 2. The Town Coundl linde Itud the development plan for BpeeW De+dopn»nt Re. trla No. 28 meats eadt d the esartdarde stl Torts In 9ectlon 1 BA0.090 d IM Muridpal Code d the Town d Yai a demonstndes ihtl s31wr ens a more d them b red ' _ ' ~ a thed a Ixedical edulbn crosietem wRh the pdr4o lsrssl bars been ecftkved, In ercgprdanae w8h Ssotbn 18.40.010, the dsvelopmed plan fa tipsciel Asvelopnenl Dielrkl No. 2S V . ]. The dsvelopmem plan b mmpdaed o! lhaea plan eubmhled by Pierce, 9egerberg end 9paeh Arehiteeb, and aonsble of the Idlowing dawn»nls: 1, Shed N0. A1, dated January 27, 1892 and rerhed March 18, 7892 (siSS plan}. . 2, shoes Noe. A2-A6, dtled January 2], 7992 and rertasd Merck 10. lB92 (fk-1, second, !bird and iovrth Ibor Abney. 3. Sheet No. 0.B, dated January 27, 1992 Imd plan}. 4. Sheet Nos. A7-A9, dated January 27, 1982 and revleed MereA iB, 1982 (North, 3odh, Eats end WeH slevtlbnsy. 5. Shad No. L1, dated January 27, „192 0nd rev6ed March ti and Mmdt 76, 19BR (< .. ~ _, , Pbot.~ . .. . ... ... ..... „ & Pghing Pten for Ldt Pte, dtlad Febnrary 8, 1892 and revleed February 7B, 1982 and Mardi 18.1982, 7. North dawdton d Idtby, dated AAA 22, 1881. S. proposed Durrpeter n.'.. /'..doted AprN i 21, 1892, i TM Town COUn0i flnde Bug a~.r~y'devWbn d a+a dla>rlct idn bsndNel to die lam Ih~ol ' ouheetgh Iha edverae a8eclr d evOh dsvWhn. ' The : 't . eteglards fa Spedel Develop:' ` mad Oistdd.No, 2B Ilre ... I yj tM Tawn ' . Countll ae j pu7 d Bete nd.'.gir?a:;i yy1+~~a ~+; ;~ ~<,wa~i ~ SETBACKS:' r.~'1" K-r+*'rrr;5;"+s,?y. _ :_.)~ 'Sskbacka ahaYl Lbe"ai'doilperitad'oli'~thi° . ,'}psu~i set Iath.Nl Seelig} 2 d Ihla"' Ordharwe.' ••'0 W , In ~ s . n - 9uRdYM helgM, la A atapkl8 YOOr, fhaB not ay: ' ' oeed'~4B ied from Oxlging'.ar 11nNhad 'grade: ~'~. L man reelrk4M; or for a Btl q rMn• "' wd tooti ehtdl 11d Orpeed 46 lid trap exYlktg ' a Rntrhsd grade, wfiidtw"d Y Irnn- raehlgiva, "i ' C. bENBifY_ : ^:.y ::~,u :.,.a....-;,,;,., , . ::I+. C . .. : Iq 9Db ~No. 28 shag be NmRad b ~ a marlriairit d 3 dwolNng unNS and 21 rsoconl• s ' mara6an uhh~, as dealgnalad do the Ibor plane ", ed Earth kr 8adlen 2 d Ihb Ordlnrloa,'svrd oe ' --7. Tttel}roas Raekelakl~FbgArea (OAFAy=: shall bs lmiad to a mratnrfm d 74,157 W: R: d ' '- witch 7,336 iq. R, ahaN bi dedloaRed W aaolxik-- nedetidn urtib 6.047 eq. R, aeaN be dedicated Io dwaikq mNe end 7.741 p. R afwN ba dediotlsd to aaaew oorrrrnn area R ehouM rlso W ndsd ' , char Ihs proviefon la nn addibnd 426 ay. K. d '~ riRFA. w9ttoh k>appffad~te 7o cerla{n xms "~ dlelrkH, does net apply to Ada 9Pedy De'+Rlp-; ~ n»M OAtdoL ' 2. Th- appttoard a his 1a100eaaara ki~kRerset,. unR, he ~ pb aaotmKM Air u~y/ssw~ ds~ry~ realdenae.ioo+dsd d t1B4,Cslbin CYaIWI.d 2.. ' Sloak 2,~Ye11 Vattsy Flnt'FIIinQQ, lar.ws b7', d the Upper Eagle Yrllsy { housing uaht In qr folbwkg rrautna:.:. ~.. , ~a. Fhe smployn hodainp un(t shell 6a' with a fuN. khdreq (. ~ - . x, stove,: _' tWr, avert ~.~'.. .~ and ahaN ltd b broad or; . ronled ia~ cry palbd Wa'tlwrt'.90 ~axlawANe I ', days and abets Ion rarBed qty to tenerlh wire an r fu lime ., to lhallpper Eagle VaNey:•~; • h The <lpper EagN Yaiay shall a deemed to:. inaWde rho Gan YaHsy.:Mbtlum,.Aed CINf,? Eeigls.Yai apd Avm and IhaY aurrotardlnp raae,~.. o.~ANlFlkne'. .~ -YapenmwhowOrka, an avenge d thirty boon per Beek, " .d,The appl;cam a hh suooeeten In Iderosl .'~ ehe8 Flw a tlecmetlon d mvanenq end rsstriN :4 tbni wRFI lhs Clerlt end Fieoorder d EeBk Coun- ~' ty kr a term aPProvd hY IM Tewe Atlgrrsy 1a the benelk d IM Tam b Mun the rra0blbns eel rarlh harsh shall run wih iha Fend, Sold dedra• tkn shA ttal M amended or n ~. ... wihoui .. Ihs written approval d the Tam d Yd. Suhss• ' . good b dta e8ee6vs date d Ihb ordkrllrlos, no buidkg perm! eha8 ba ktwad fa the ~ . ' : mod d Ihb tiperlet C . ' DtNdal No. 28 `: umi sole dedaratlm d 601rnenb and reslrb tige are aaeaWed end filed with the Eeete Cavt• .~ y Clerk end Reaardx. - . 3. Tlrs epplloerd w Ab sugeasars In lnlarstl ', ~ris'epM*p tlY reetrid 0ns msRe dweNlnp Lodge) tootled tl 38877arHen~ Rortdr Roadllat D, Sbc7t 2, Pall VHsga F(rtl Fiiny;'eowrdhg to 9adian 17.2&.076 • C. .. - ~ :un CmversSal, d '' tlta Town d Vag zmrrg Cade.ltts aPp9oaM or ' h4 auroesoare h hdxsst ehaN 8b a dedertlion d owenenta arts rsellidloM wUhtha Clerk and Recorder d Eegb Cony fn a lorrtr : by the town Anomey rar the HaridR d file Town to Iwun the reelr;C{ma ad 1Mh herMn ahdl run with the rand. 9ald dsdartlion ahdl not fie amert- ~; dad q temtineled Yr@Itfqul 11N wgiten apprwal d -~ lhs Towed Vai. Subaequem to lM arteo3re dtls "i d Ihb tsMhvnos, no bu9drrp psmtM ahd be k- sled !ar the redsvelepmsnt of Ihts Spsolel D ~ ; DbIrM Na 2B unlN sold dedsrelion d owenenN and reatrldime an ezxdad and ~s tied with the Falk County Cork Md Recorder. - 0. SITE COVERAGE: ~ ' The maximum alfowaMs eke mveregs ror Ld . D shall red ercead 3976 d the buibable rot size ' oral shat be as deatgneeed err the develolaned Plana set talk in Seelbn 2 d Ihie Oldirunoe. E. LANb3CAPIN6: AI brat IhSdy.hvo percent }32!41 d Lai D shall ba WvdwWred and ahNl be as designated m the -loonent nleno sd lath Rr Sertlon 2 d this ~~jl