HomeMy WebLinkAbout770 Potato Patch Dr Condo commonDEPARTMENT OF COI,OVfUITI/ DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE AT ALL TIMES
ADD/ALT MF BUILDPERMT Pennit #:802-0173
Job Address.: 870 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
Location......: TT0POTATOPATCHCLUB
ParcelNo....: 210106306047
Project No...:
owNER POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDO ASs'005/06/2002 Phone:
? VAII, HOME RENTAIS
143 E MEADOW DR STE 397
VAII, CO 8165?
License:
APPLICAI{IT Fritzlen Pierce Architects 05/06/2002 Phone:
Tom DuBois
1650 E Vail Valley Drive C-1
Vail, CO
Tdubois@vailarchitects . com 8165 7
License:
CoNTRACTOR PRrMA ASSOCIATES REAITTY, TJTDO'/O5/2OO2 Phone:
P.O. BOX 1292
Status.....: ISSUED
Applied...: 05/06/2002
Issued..,: 05/75/2002
Expires...: 11./77/2002
476-6342
970-476-4300
TOV/Comm. Dev.
s3,3X5.60
90.00
s3,316.50
s3,315.60
$0. 00
TOWNOFVAIL
75 S. FRONTAGEROAD
VAIL, CO 81657
97M79-2138
VAIIJ, CO
815s8
License:239-B
Desciption:
Site Improvernents; concrete retaining walls; fire hydrant
planters; new pool fence; new site lighting; new
dumpster/transformer enclosures.
Occupancy: R1 Multi-Family
Type Construction: V 1-FIR Type V l-Hour
TypeOccupancy: ??
Valuation: $311,000.00
Clean-up
approved
amount
date
Add Sq Ft:
Deposit Refund
#--a-.__.{o+__;oD, -
0
0 # of Gas [.ogs:#ofFireplace Information Restricted:# of Gas Appliarres:
Wood Pellet FEE SUMMARY
Building->
Plan Check->
Investigation->
will call_->
51, 584 . 00 Restuarant Plan Review->
$1,029.50 DRB F€e-->
SO - 00 Recreation Fee->
$3 . 00 Clean-uP DePosit->
TOTAL FEE$-->
90. 00
$200.00
$0-00
Total Calculated FeeF>
Additional Fees->
Total Perrrit Fee-->
$500.00 Payments->
s3,316.50 BALANCEDUE---->
Approvals:I€eim: O5100 BUILDING
05/L4/2002 JRN!
Item:05400 PITANNING
DEPARTI{ENT
Action: AP
DEPARTI{ENT
0s/06/2002 ao
rICM: O55OO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Item: 05500 PITBI-,fC WORKS
Act,ion: AP
See page 2 of this Document for any conditions that may apply to this permit.
DECLARATIONS
I hereby acknowledge ttrat I have read this applicatiorl filled out in full the inforrration required, completed an
accurate plot plan, and state that all the information as required is correct. I agree to comply with the information and
plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state laws, and to build this structure according to the towns zoninp
and subdivision codes, design review approved, Uniforrr Building Code and other ordinances of the Town applicable
thereto.
REQUESIS FOR INSPECIION SHALL BE MADE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS IN ADVANCE BY TELEPHONE AT479-2149 OR AT OUR OffiCE FROM 8:00 AM - 4
PM.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR HIMSELF AND OWNEF
PAGE 2
*******rt*************!*{it****{itlr*#*ftt*li****t**#***tit*******!l**'t**********************************
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Permit#: 802-0123 asof 0G1&2003 Status: ISSUED
PermitType: ADD/ALTMFBLIILDPERMT Applied: 05/06/2002
Applicant Fritzlen Pierce Architects Issued: 05/75/2N2
476-6342 ToExpire: 11/11/2002
Job Address: 870 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
Location: 770POTATO PATCH CLTIB
ParcelNo: 210106306,047
Description:
Site Improvements; concrete retaining walls; fire hydrant
planters; new pool fence; new site lighting; new
dumpster/ transformer enclosures.
Conditions:
Cond:12
(BLDG.): FIELD INSPECTIONS ARE REQLIIRED TO CHECK FOR CODE
COMPUANCE.
Cond:14
(BLDG.): ALL PENETRATIONS IN WALIS,CEILING'AND FLOORS TO
BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED FIRE MATERIAL.
Cond:16
(BLDG.): SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED IN ALL BEDROOMS AND
EVERY STORY AS PER SEC.310.9.1 OF THE 1997 UBC.
Cond: L
(FIRE): FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY
WORK CAN BE STARTED.
* * ++**'i{' '} * **+i***** * ** I tt + ++ | * + *+ * ****1'} * + ****t *****r**+** ** **** *** * ** **** * ** f* *r* * **+******t
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADOGopy Rrprhtod or 0G1&2011!l d 12..1924 06/1812003
Statement
+ **** t * * ******'f f + ***** *+ * * *+t'a*******if+* + + +*a' * ***** ****++***t*****+ * * * ** * * + **** * *******a **+
Statement Number: R000002399 Amount: $3,316.60 05/L5/2OO2O3|22 PM
Payment Method: Check Init: DDG
Notation: 4aa5 - 77o
Potato Patch
Permit No: 802-0123 Type: ADD/ALT MF BUIIJD PERI.{IT
Parcel lilo: 210105305047
Site Address: 870 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL
I,ocaIion: 770 POTATO PATCH CII,B
Total Feee: $3.315.50This Palment: $3,316.50 Total AL,L Pmta: 93,315.60Balance: $0.00
** 't**** * t +***++{r'}**+ * * *** * ** *+ *f s *+***l' *+ +*+**'t 'i** * ++*********+'t***++ f * * ** ** * +*+ ++*tt***+* + + *
ACCOUNTITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
AD Dz-DEPO8 CLEANUP DEPOSITS 5OO.OO
BP OO1OOOO31111OO BUILDING PERI4IT FEES 1.584.00
DR OO1OOOO31122OO DESIGN REVIEI,I FEES 2OO.OO
PF 00100003i12300 PLAN CHECK FEES 1,029.60
i,JC OO1OOOO31128OO WILL CALL INSPECTION FEE 3.OO
o
<;
gl
'ErozOD.oO:EB.{
l<ct tzottd8
oo
c;
oo
.:E
Eg
lr trHEt.oz8tsE
E
E
&ttlIIul
d
H
F.
oo
|n
o
o
o
ut
3q
A(
H
E
xT
EpqtD
F
at
(l.
al.o
citatr
Ec.J
t
e
o
rtoE
dooo
F'OHE(6i8AE
ct
6tROQ&
AFza&oEE!i(
cEE{
.a
FI FIzaTE,
E9
B|(
a(
BErco
il 9H{
R
6rE
l<lrHE('EdxEdo
It{
6
h
e:.d
E{
2ot{
H
ECTU40au oEEre gE
B g8
aH
3.
B
q
FI
o
l.InE
2
qc
E.
raoAEA
:
;
r'{ D
&6I>oEtrIg!lao44a(' l|go tcfi oAAH
t
ror4,Nffi)
Design Review Board
ACTION FORM
Deparbnent of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
telt 970.479.2L39 fax: 97 0.479.2452
web: www.ci,vail.co.us
hoi€ct lfame: 770 Potato Pakh DRB Number: DR8020182
Project Description:
Add stone wainscot new roof, new fence @ pool, nen retaining wall facing and new site
lighting.
Pafticipants:
OWNER BOOTHCREEKMANAGEMENTCORP06/13/2002 Phone:
1OOO S FRONTAGE RD W STE 1OO
VAIL CO
81657
License:
APPUCANT Tom Dubois 0611312002 Phone:476-6342
FriElen Pierce Architects
1650 E Vail Valley Drive C-1
Vail, CO
Tomdubois@vailarchitects.com 81657
License:
Project Address: 870 POTATO PATCH DR VAIL Location: 770 Potato Patch Drive
Legal Description: lot: 7TH. Block: Subdivision: POTATO PATCH CLUB CONDOM
Parcel Number: 210106306043
Comments:
BOARD/STAFF ACrION
MoUon By: Woldrich Action: APPROVED
Second By: Acevedo
Vote: 4-0-1 (Pierce recused) Date ofApproval= 0710512002
Conditions:
Cond:8
(PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of
Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s).
Cond: 0
(PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with
Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities.
Planner: Allison Ochs DRB Fee Paid: $25O.OO
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, June 19, 2002
3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS
PUBLIC WELCOME
PROJECT ORIENTATION / LUNCH - Community Development Department
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Clark Brittain
Bill Pierce
Hans Woldrich
Charlie Acevedo
Margaret Rogers
SITE VISITS1. Clark residence - 488/ Juniper Lane2. Weiss residence - 3838 Bridge Road3. Robason residence - 1139 Sandstone Drive4. 770 Potato Patch - 770 Potato Patch Drive5. Phillips 66 - 2293 N. Frontage Rd. West6. Alphorn Condos - 121 West Meadow Drive7. Villa Cortina - 22 West Meadow Drive8. Daymer Corporation - 123 S. Frontage Rd. East9. Vail Mountain Lodge - 352 E. Meadow Drive10. Vail Resorts - 600 Lionshead Mall
f/Qeopr
12:00 pm
1:00 pm
BillDriver:
PUBLIC HEARING . TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Villa Cortina DRB02-0172. Bill
Final review of change to approved plans.
22 West Meadow Drive/Lot A, Vail Village 2no Filing.Applicant Nedbo Construction
MOTION: BillPierce
CONSENT APPROVED
SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0
2. 770 Potato Patch DRB02-0182. Allison
Final review of proposed addition of stone.
770 Potato Patch Drive/Lot 6, Vail Potato Patch.Applicant 770 Potato Patch Drive Condo Assoc., Inc., represented by Fritzlen Pierce
Architects.
MOTION: Hans Woldrich SECOND: Charlie Acevedo
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:1. That the applicant submit a drawing of the west elevation of the upper building for
review by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit.
3:00 pm
VOTE:4-0-1 (Pierce
;g*oAa1
{rI^hd
3. Fleischer residence DRB02-0108 Bill' Final review of two new single-family residences.
4315 Bighorn Rd./Lot 6, Block 3, Bighorn 3rc Addition.Applicant Chad Fleischer, represented by John G. Martin, Architect, AIA
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 3 CONDITIONS:
'1 . That in lieu of the proposed 6 blue spruce trees, 10 blue spruce trees 8 to 10 feet in
height and 10 blue spruce trees 12 to 14 feet in height be planted.
2. That an arborist report be submitted to verify the survivability of the proposed
landscape plan and to establish a tree preservation plan prior to the issuance of
building permits.
3. That staff review and approve the final landscape placements prior to installation.
Allison4. Clark residence DRB02- 0188 .
Final review of proposed entry addition
4887 Juniper Lane/Lot 78, Block 4, Bighorn 5h Addition.
Applicant: Stephen & Jackie Clark
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 CONDITION:
't . That this is the one-time exemption to the requirement that the entire structure must
be brought into compliance with the Design Guidelines. Specifically, any future
addition of GRFA to this structure will require the removal of the T-1 11 siding.
5. Vail Resorts DRB02-0143. George
Final review of proposed outdoor trampoline.
600 Lionshead Mall/Tract D, Vail Lionshead 1'' Filing.
Applicant: Vail Resorts
MOTION: Bill Pierce SEGOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 1 GONDITION:
1. That the applicant submits revised plans to the Community Development
Department indicating the location of a split-rail fence and a minimum of six
landscaped planters. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Department.
6. Weiss residence DRB02-0160 Allison
Final review for changes to approved plans
3838 Bridge Road/Lot 12, Bighorn Subdivision zno Addition.
Applicant: VAg Inc.
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE: 5-0
l. That prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall file the final plat
for the resubdivision of Lots 1 1 and 12, Bighorn 2noAddition.2. That prior to the submittal of a Building Permit application, the applicant shall
meet all the concerns of staff addressed in the letter dated June 13.2002.
oa3. That the approval for this application will void the approval of the Weiss
Residence on June 20.2001 .4. That the applicant submit revised drawings of the tower element and a new roof
material for review and approval by staff.
7. Daymer Corporation DRB02-0192. Allison
Final review of proposed wood decking
123 S. Frontage Rd. EasULots M,N &O, Block 5D, VailVillage 1't Filing.Applicant Daymer Corporation, represented by John Perkins, AlA.
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Margaret Rogers VOTE:4-0 (Acevedo
recused)
APPROVED WITH 2 GONDITIONS:
1. That the applicant shall be required to make the following improvements to Phase
lV, Vail Village Inn, prior to the issuance of a TGO for Club Chelsea:
. All restaurant signs refering to the Village Restaurant be removed.. The dumpster area be cleaned up.. The fence around the pool be painted and repaired as necessary.o The shutters and llower boxes on al ine entrance be repainied.. That the existing Villager Restaurant awnrng be removed and any necessary.
repair and repainting as a result of the removal be done.. The two walls at the existing Villager Restaurant entry be repainted to match
existing.. Power wash the stucco and repaint if necessary.. Dumpster enclosure to be reviewed by the DRB.r A landscape plan must be submitted for review by staff.. A revised color scheme must be submitted for review by staff.. Remove the fence at the pool and walkway.. Atl necessary repairs to the north side must be completed.
2. That the applicant submit either a letter from the condominium association from the
entire Vail Village Inn, stating that they approve of the proposed deck covering; or,
the applicant shall provide evidence that the entire Vail Village Inn site does not have
the right to use the existing recreational facilities of phase lV, Vail Village Inn, prior to
the issuance of a building permit for the proposed decking.
8. Robason residence DRB02-0163. George
Conceptual review of new single family residence.
1 139 Sandstone Drive, Indian Creek Townhomes/Lot ,{1 , Block A, Lions Ridge Filing 1 .
Applicant: Randy D. & Donna Robason, represented by Steven James Riden
CONCEPTUAL_ NO VOTE
9. Alphorn Condominiums DRB02-0164. Allison
Conceptual review of fagade remodel.
121 West Meadow Drive/Lot D2, Vail Village 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Alphorn Condo Assoc., represented by Ray Story
CONCEPTUAL _ NO VOTE
'10. Phillips 66 DRB02-0184. Allison
Final review of proposed retaining wall.
2293 N. Frontage Road WesUTract A, Vail das Schone Filing 1.
Applicant Feather Petroleum Co., represented by Stephen Richards.
MOTION: Bill Pierce SECOND: Charlie Acevedo VOTE: 5-0
CONSENT APPROVED WITH 2 CONDITIONS:
1. That prior to the issuance of a CO, the applicant provide a newspaper box
enclosure, similar in design to the newspaper box enclosure located at the First
Bank Building.2. That the retaining wall not be painted.
11. Vail Mountain Lodge DRB02-0185. George
Final review of amendment to approved plans revising the dormers on the east side of
the building.
352 E. Meadow Drive/Tract B, Vail Village 1"'Filing.
Applicant: VML, LLC
MOTION: Charlie Acevedo SECOND: Bill Pierce . -._ VOTE: 5-0
TABLED UNTIL JULY 3,2002
12. Middle Creek DRB02-0060 Allison
Conceptual review of proposed employee housing development & private educational
Institution.
160 N. Frontage Rd./to be platted as Lot 1, Middle Creek Subdivision.
Applicant: Vail Local Housing Authority, represented by Odell Architects
CONCEPTUAL - NO VOTE
Staff Approvals
Vail lnternational DRB02-0112. Allison
Lobby/office addition.
300 E. Lionshead Circle/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 2m Filing.
Applicant: VaillnternationalCondoAssociation
Zachariah residence DRB02-0140. George
Entry replace bricks with flagstone.
4074 Bighorn Road/Lot 3, Bighorn Subdivision.Applicant Bobby & Liby Zachariah
Klinga residence DRB02-0168. George
New solit rail fence with mesh.
1773 Shasta Place/Lot 13, Vail Village West 2nd Filing.
Applicant: Elizabeth A. Klinga
Olson residence DRB02-0169. George
Driveway change from asphalt to heated concrete.
1 785 Sunburst DriveA/ail Golfcourse Townhomes.
Applicant: Curtis & Kristin Olson
Wood/Pringle residence DRB02-0167. Bill
Revised landscape plan.
1146 Sandstone Drive/Lot A-7, Block 13, Casolar Vail.
Applicant: Thomas Pringle
Fresco Holding Co, Inc. DRB02-0179. Allison
Skylight addition.
103 Willow Place, Edelweiss Condos/Lot 4, Block 6, Vail Village l"tFiling.Applicant Nedbo Construction
Seigal residence DRB02-0150. Bill
Change to approved plan.
356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Christiania.Applicant: Gail Siegal
Simpson residence DRB02-0156. Allison
Enclose lower portion of deck with lattice.
1813 Shasta Place/Lot 17,Yail Village West Filing 2.Applicant Judith A. Simpson
The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during
regular office hours in the project planner's office, located at the Town of Vail Community
Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information.
Sign language interpretation available upcn request utilh 24 hour notification. Please call 479-
2356,Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information.
TOI4AI
Application for Design Review
Department of Community Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.ci.vail.co. us
General Information:
All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. please
refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application ior Design Reviewcannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. Theproject may also need to be reviewed by the Town C-ouncil and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission.Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and construction commences withinone year of the approval,
Description of the Requesfi Apn STohlF lJAdSeoT T,, aylgT\{4 ELD6JA5 lbjn\cfrF\ ail lTTtc\rFA pRal-llhJ.?,1
Locationoftheproposal: Lot: - Block:? subaivision:VelLT&rfo?Tcl.f
Physical Address:
Parcef No.: * toto[ozL1wl'. ET L (contact Eagle co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.)
Zonins: Itt ot tF
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant;
Mailing Address:
Phone:
E-mail Address;
$50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area.
No Fee
$650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild.$300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or
commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions).
$250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and
retaining walls, etc.$20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as,
reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping. fences and
retaining walls, etc.$20 For revisions to plans
Design Review Board.
No Fee
Type of Review and Fee:tr Signs
Conceptual Review
New Construction
Addition
Minor Alterdtion
(multi-fami lylcommercial)
Minor Alteration
(single-family/duplex)
Changes to Approved Plans
Separation Request
ft
tr
D
lr
u
tr
D
Mailing Address:
F.".'f;T"",,15t@'r'N,o., \t4( sv,
Buildinq Materials
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trim
Doors
Door Trim
Hand or Deck Rails
FIues
Flashing
Chimneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
Retaining Walls
Exterior Lighting
Other
Notes:
Please specify the m
PROPOSED MATERIALS
TvEe of Material Color
SroJe W?EK ATIr<HE ! fllolo
anufacturer's name
a
\
Page 6 of Lzl02lo7l02
, the color name and number and attach a color chip,
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Iune 12,2002
Ms. Allison Ochs
Community Development Department
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road West
Vail, CO 81657
F:e: 770 Potato Patch Drive Condominiums
Rock Facing of Units
Dear Allison:
The purpose of this letter is to convey the approval by the770 Potato Patch Drive
Condominium Association for the rock facing of all units per the May 31,2002,
renderings as updated to reflect wrapping the stone work around certain buildings.
Please call ifyou have any questions.
Sincerely,
Arlt a ,t
r.' -- t
IBill Sargent
Crossroads Realty, Ltd.
Managing Agent
770 Potalo Patch Drive Condominium Association
PO. Box 1292, Yal, Colorado 81658 / Crossroads Shopping Center / 143 E, Meadow Drive-Suite 39lA
email: home@crossroadsrealtvvail.com website: www.crossroadsrealtvvail.com
* * ** * * * + * + + i+ ** * * * * * *+ + * ** a +* * t * * a * * if I {rt * * +* + * { i * t ** + ++ i I * * I * | * + + * I' f*** + I * i * f t i i**'} + i ** '} 't* {'
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Stat€ment
*+*t*+*{.*** *t***+** **+'tf 't' ***++t++*+**+*+'t*******l****+t+f f I'tl+**+**i+'}*+***{t+'1.*+*i+*+****t++
Statement Number: ROOOOO2559 Anount: $250.00 06/L3/200208:53 AM
Payment Method r Check Inlt: ,fAR
NoeaEion: 4898770 Potato ' Patch Condo Aesoc
Permit No: DRB02o182 Ilpe: DRg-Mlnor Alts' Comrn/Multi
Parcel No: 2101053 0504 3
Site AddreEB ! 970 POTATO PATCI{ DR VAIL' LocatLon3 ??0 Potato Patch Drive Total FeeE: $250 ' 00
This Payment ! $25O,OO Total ALL, Pmts: $250'00
Balance: i0.00
* * * t * * + * f* + * +** * * f **t I't t ** t'f i'i * tl} + + + + * + + **t * f,+ * * *'i+ *+ t t **** *+ * **+ ** +* * a *l**** tat *** a* * +*+ f **
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Account Code Description Current Pmts
DR 00100003112200 DESTGN REvlEl'i FEES 250.00
7 @lrE arar|olJ.rs9!0 ooydoror ln^lolvJ o]vroJ ]|v^ !,]orcsunruluropuol rllled owfod 0ll csSF.
=
eo
ztJ)LJJ I )l\/NsF u-.ru.-LL O-U_Jtrt-M.cIUFo_Fe_-l.-\I-\
llll'lliilalt;ll*I
-llio ll.IU IE< il$o
IF-M-o,,^\\ Z,/ \\\' t\ ..Ot-------=,/l\J// totf)F7-]
l
rErErErErErH f [\llttHfthln EtlHltffirffiffif, ,it-
I
tl
t|)[l
clocid){I[Jtrs\EqS
rfl
FIzl3-q-
F]
21
=tt
oo
o
I
ztnLIli )-J -iNc4FUJt.-LL O-Uilll -ll rlril>ll t-vil.-ll! -llr =llfl ir \lt$ yt.,,t-l3<Itl Ltl]t -IFil<ll Fo-I-\
I--\
\\ -T-Str€sK\\---!-,t\\ \1__\ CIt\Z r{oF7
lr
F- iliol.
lU ll5<
1l$o
ll =lltF ll.rn lls
f, llr* il"'o
-lFIzl=l:|-zl-t-
:i
-l=lll
"lFI
=lf,l
(f)l.lIz.lfl
:r
=l=l
-7 IJJLIJ OtvNoa Ut\I LrJl>lit,ll* r-ItxYlsslu. rJ-IYl<f| '-o_l.-\
l.-'.t
lle
i- llio ll$tu ils< ll$o
ll!F ltif) lls{ lliru ll$o
It--M_oZA\ n-/ \\\v--z) 6\//t/ r-tf)F-lSs\-,.SI'lFlzlllqFIzlflI\/II
t,lollFlz.llfl\-lirl\zli=l1l
\
\
)
I
I
\
-UII lr-l-l>l^/l6 lJl_rl;Ttn r \IRY| .. t-ti<lH^t-IFtsr=o_cl'-\t-\S,e=:s TFMoZ,,-\\ [\/ \\\\-----=,4\J// oIDF7)IiiIItt,ol ;lzl
-l
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
)
I
-vU_Jr-ltrll ,,iMIOll rvzll. -ll o -,\\ tlt ll; r/ \\\ --lli., I-) $.ils v\ ,/,// - ll,;r l-\z/ oD lld S-ll"'oinll or-l F=l=l Foo_|-\
l.t\
I
-lzl
otlFI
0_ tl
O llstt-u ll'I ll .l
||) lls{ ll:-u ll'io
l.e
i- il*ol.*lll l!< ll$o
lle
F lli,
'.n ll$d llgu ll$o
S€<.>,@>
@
1I \,\(ol);lt2lllri{li-1l!ltzllfltlo
Irfl
-lFI
=l-l
T|-zl-l
o
zu)rJ-J | )t\/Nozl-rrle.-LL O-U-JIII-M.cIUFo_Ir.\
l.t-t-
ltIFvozroO'l-uJ.t.-r.f)FzlS€-es.\
r-l
-lFlzl-t
ztJ)L!( )Noal--rrtd.-(-)-]tJ-t-M.9-rT$v,ii l-?<80_F()o_-l-\l..\:tF_l_oEs r)cv--> (// \ NKv; *\\_,/ f-oFz_loo
a
nrlt__lnrrt__l
z tLt5uNsFurEe I(-ll'.F.gL)ll(a)(al-i:+-J('r9Gfi1 ?\Y\ H\ nr a\€oF:-E--,!HSH-oN>/ +.i aa -r*yJaaxqu\ ^V \rr rj C) bFtJ-F's?*O-EvN<.>&'d\{t)XOoclF\J)ZF-ZLIJe.(t)fznItznUTUFo-cFFcr-\N =G.s_><<1r z
I _-l
N+-
\! \-
frl1q'<__)z{P<J
z rJ.J=uNEF u.Jii o-FIul:IIc,NLU to>\0-OT,iU<-c,soooFUF-ro?o->
(t
.z
Eg
xr E FEILIJ| € zllJ r'Al i .o ! = A'eliE
-t qJ th 7. r ..1:E E-oeui-c e'=;Eg-CtraiL:O;-;FEooz E x;:'l-?, b - { g Lxa !E = f,^= - >-; a
=tre{,/-\LLyn- = -.= + = E;u 5.E E .= '=;: i E=€'-e*ie'E==s-iE;zez5=,i
-oico+.n\otidoi3
al-z=AL/ozoUTUFo-oFFoo-
Nt\
oo
ztu!uNEF|rIIo-:I
6d)
O
= J-)
(n d)
vlv (g
c{ -)c\ ii ,r
Yr \r, I r.L,,a1 a..l
-\lXi sF f.'-\./ (n
ara
^a1 \o t) -icO i.,, Y ..{t'- ; ,E !JC1 \1 Q)
ll a atlI !V - ll<1-r!-.o-4'O O) u) 'l-F !.{ \o d.a.t r -.,1qr-a{\r
;*; .\t -.,- POr- .6 -=
=: t^/
'= \r rv
,ra\ \J../ L
=q,POii PD€
'J=v)a)Aal
)1 :>afi
E<-Jr2- ol=coe. J4i4 -:= !/l--X..|^9/.i.-9,,^.r\J ll- ',,1 \',r-l\va+!l!-Y 5 ^f-.il!r*v;E'.: X coO7;: !N-; Lr /a\Y.2 E ::L . t ) nrtrlv/c_-lin:>d
a0rlil iLt i-
-El J n
=l
soig
t! .El 'E cr &,5 €l = fr g
r9lx fr '*l qi -.. 5 oolE=2
3 il ;:1I s el=:R
= : <l €h-=3; El3 E ol b;X o ;l .f "* ocl =L]2ti*Xtrl crE:v'=l g:E
vr):lfJNI U
.c
.d
-r
q.)
q.)
q)
a.)
=11
.0.).=
'(^
c
'r=
t_
I(|-?'1E-a\l!J ^ N 'r.rJtl-sr-): >- \O ::vnr-v<=co\o-.i nNlJ -- v <.1-L.-^.{/-\A/va\L 4 r I -La) v \L,f\ ra\ - a\ri.-)o-
I
I
fll \t,i!_ 'r
-r ia.:-u) -.C OD
Y!-
7t t r.,\J
=t^OO
cjjilr
\J./ i. (..la- A /'t t
AlY\J-1AN,:.Y l'\ \J
)-w
F\Jo=3'- '= L,-/1) l-)-' \J
FtXF6\
=l qJ=.trl ;=.i.'i| (J \J Yrr- | a- \,Ol:-(.r).-l -l-l o-r crvt .:Nnl t,/]]-F
/11-l9l
0Jl
olLlo-l
oo
z trJ:UNsFUffL :Ira-ta.l(hztlJ=z=(h
4W
/EL/
I
/+=
fl
I
,il
i':' I,l
I
--"- -\(-)
!n
sl
EI
sl
brtEI
EI
9l
etlJF
l
cd
c,fI
{
tlJFtlJ
z
I
tl,l
a
tlJ tlJzz
FF
=3trJ tlJzz
IY
o
U
bo
(t
XtfJ
z tLJ5uNdF u.Jffo.:tojlc'-C .rl9tg?i-^ vlxJ: ="- (g |..l-E .-r a(!v!.\ Ogr- ;i = :v^fx=9J., aJ.g E ",I r'9! =:-Pr-:':cdi; G5 -o^14 .= i(Jw;(!;,<9;fto z.'; +EE* #€ E=EogPQ h::a, 9939!=i =;it s:3-4.\<-t>_r--.-_CJ)--1 .-{./i ^\/-\-Ei; Eix-6: >.=(-=2o'= ofr-i""*E;'Ent; .=;===-0,:=51 , otc;*.=:;;;-! €;l(;F>:€=c, l^* q;=U.E=lneJ- i-di EE 3 0.,.E sE'i cr-=- -o-Eo,EE9EUE&5= &e8*E=EE*a-.t(t)z2=IIJcd(t)=zz
z tL)!uNsF|rJffo.:I_o -i:--:v:/Y =\l/ !-Y.AJ :-o-! I I9Qi -!cr-(J.>a"\!c.,/ I O -'6|.\ . .;::X'!u-\Jal^-Y:\./\r, Ll.\.l_ ts -.U =al E \1,,c.= - 6 co)N0);O\,.i.!? i a cr -lf=: - o-xr- *F .. -.=.: _ti Y x5;tr gY(, 6 ; Ln o-.:zUzt!IIJ
f1
F.
tt)
lu
o
=
5lolol 0J
trl =ul o
6l c
Hl
=o,l c,Qlz
z tLJ5uNdFLUffo-;En-.c A'l F.= 9c,, i -cE3 =*"fr ;na' ^-a F v! .--.,, r i .g'- 3ci. =+.: -^ =.;65 -ie *!;:i €:? a!;c= =p"n :^:;!/ w.', ^^ |+i eff 3:;A; ar: u-U U dS cL r t+=; -!:f ::3Eg 3iQ+ df:p i c, ^-3.X -.= o:: <l;:* u'i,"+ ' ; c, P"* = ^-?t. '.by! F+U.- : 0'/ CJlv ?- ^ fYl|rJC')UzIIJa_thzt4J(n-\
o.ztr=z.-lrJJ c
Za-
=
(lN
Jo
FO-
e- 2f
Fztr rJJ
a-z
z
z tL)!uNdFtuffd_.c(guu L.jr*N$,(Ar4,- | -= r-o-= - 4. .! r'1^_ -- --\V.L \)L \J F-z
z tJ.)=uNdF|rJffo-IfcXo'*E,.U--r-:Lr-.=LriE =a -o =- 'i1 ; S-PEl=F: =ei:-; + rEtge ir=E i E: 9: E^,',?iEgtj?3F, ; nE" .tne e;-=xE;,ii:1 J .EE s-3 !E=jI!r;:-:a e ;1-- {Ei==v=r = E=e jEl E+i;;:x-=ii F 515 dg+ ''E+- f;P=",;=e-Z - E--;F c,*- !8g5"=3i=:r7! iE=.f i i:=i :EFE*;PE15gg JEiE.,? JEE :€c*;-E'6N(t)zIIJztrf(^
UJ
(n
o(
(h
x
TOTN O
Depalt ment of C ommunity D eve I op men t
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
970-479-2138
MX 970-479-2452
www.ci.vail.co.us
Tom Dubois
Fritzlen Pirece Architects
1650 E VailValley Drive C-1
Vail, CO 81657
RE: 770 Potato Patch Exterior Renovations
Dear Tom,
The Design Review Board conceptually reviewed the proposed exterior renovations for
770 Potato Patch on the May 1 ,2002, meeting. They were generally supportive of the
application. However, they did state that due to the configuration of lhe buildings and
units, all of the units would have to add stone at one time and that no phasing would be
permitted.
When you are ready lo proceed with this proposal, please submit an application and
appropriate fees. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 970-479-2369.
Sincerelv, -rA,l' /'lilit,- I )
l+W|,t jpz-
Allison Ochs, AICP
Planner ll
Town ol Vail
{p *""""uo 'o'ur
Nclacw
60
Eo-
F<Jtr ICE
z trJ
:UNdFlrt
=-Io-
:ol
az
U
F
-ZIIJ
M.
ct')
lz
=^/1zcU
T
UF
r.\
A
F
FA
Ft
NF-
oo
z rJ.r5uNe,tsurf. o.
NuJ to>\04,aoo
TF\U<-4,so
AA
FU
l- -Jo?o-)
(h
6
=9
XI EFErrrl sQl .. =; bEzl=
-l ; E ann;€ e'=: F gtr E ar r;
=-;;FZof,i
ttr==L ii;!-a=sE* E = oo? e hp ed=-.=sF=z;6xEE.='=:9€X + '= = = = 3 '= a =oEd-EEt5Ee
-.ic";+.r;\o(€6=
(r't
z
A\JozcU
T
UF
o-
AvF
FoA
NN
oo
z tLt
=uNEl-lrjr;:I
6
f+J
viv,-i A
a=
v?
- \,/ | - \L,/a,t a!<r n)\l-Nr!;; $f
\J ll (,(g aoafl \o .L2COP;9Xf'- ; .E.{Xgr-
ll .6 (! rl-Y tlr<rP;9q.,/ v IFfi\od.rr.lQ J i.'i \-./
;*; N c.i 9P
- r.r'\a)
=-ljtvE\JP#
/ra\vtl
=
tl,
l.\ n l-l rln
=.!=:.=
A a1 (n tn
\1 -- )1
L:J
P. .<
;- otrJ aO
d. J49-:Y VN></ta.-o '= ;.oL| vr.t!4 IJr
Y 5 ^Nar(.)\r-+"igf, :. d{ tU \J7;::Ni i va.Ub2 o:.. I ) dr
Y/d_-t
in J)o-
a0Jlil ibt EOl Ltr O
=l ==t gn.El 'zee,5 €l =59,r.:l{ R eI EEEj : lrl A'=z661 :coz! # el=:R
= E <r ; ". =:;EIg E :l ryEbtrl = u zfli*XCl cr!l-'Fl g-,
lrt ) : llJNI U
c
c)
c)
?'\
aq)
:-
a.]'6
c
cq)
!-
Ifl
bo
'=
E
(nqJf,>
q./ ^ t-\ 'r!rrt'_=F
-/ ^A-i, >-\o::vn)-v<=colo
-,]] a,Ny/;sr
l- r- ,i r"'l\J./ \w L t-\
^,/va.l\LLL]'\,,a I \-/ \.r/v/-\
N r.\ - r-\
'- L-1 ftl f-ri-)a
I
U
t.'tE^.Y
t'
l'-7t rnY A- !/c ,-Y\J
\l/ \J lt- n al
Y lJ -'l
YNY
l- \/
-= rh !-
t-vo=3
:: \JFl X F al)
=l di =;<ol.:-tt.vYfFt a- \JAn=-(''.rl.l o a)I.' I P N -cnl tn-F
nl-l
UI
0Jl
olLl
zlcl
FI<l>lE,Iclu-lzl;lUI
5tu,lo-l
O
6
(r)q)
L
U)
q,)
3o
ztu5uNdFtrl
ff0.
:
I
L'-ta..l
v)
Z[J
tu
=z
F(a
il
)'' I,l
I
I
'1w
/,
.//
E |---/
/+=
fl
z tLt
=uNdFBJ
ffo-
:
I
C.- t- .^L- '= v.Lji :
rA,: =-(ELr-
e3 v!.. ol4iP!P^f x::t,
., cr .!2 tr 6'
I " llE -
9d65 Gs$*a a<938" z
.d+
E+ - E!i: EE €=Eo1c? )=E9 !93!V=:, i:e€ E=E
=-= 9aE3 !5=.-')?r-\EiI :EEO EE:-::E X9EEopiqg:i] ")= ==.!scJa=., qiO;-.L:QG;0! Exi-=;F'i€=.. -- -i- e - t- ' -. Y.CJ -^ = r). 6 .= U .= - L^ l',, -/3 if EE; e =:E i g
= -^_ O_ cs CJ - ij y (c O -il': 9.g'i-fi9trE9taa ^\ d
e'l
a
zI2
=tlJ
d
V)
=zz
IIJ
slol
?l
El
€lol
sl
b4trl
cl
(gl
ol4,1
3l
2l
eIIJF
fIt
d
ulU
{
tlJFtl,J
Uz
I
=3
zz
rlJe
llJ
tll
zoI
llJqU
L/ r!
tlJ rlJzz
FFtt v)
=3tlJ llJzz
tt
tr
U
ootr
tt)
xgJ
ztu:UNdFEJffL
:
Iz
UztlJtL
IIJ
z tLJ5uNEFlrl
ffo-
:
Er"E .'--.>- gI; =FH A€
= .=-:; 9'C go: :#.xt< - u) -= --:-:i.- IsE QFgci- =.= c: -: -:-AJ : - F"E Y^E -Cb; ;a9p Fj";.=
=lr:(^.=';I>A ^ a, ,.- u =* L
=- : X..!.. i:6i!
=: ;i:f *.:3! y, - !- o I ii nn c!-c..:! ( - !+ d E"_c9I a" ^-3.X -E cxY pEts- *e:= .. 'S c.., y^iz E e€f i o I q: i- =orqj.r'.-arh
i.i'';l
=lu-|v)lzl
sl
't\l r.r.,rele,[Jl -a
t3lK>li
=tzIJI |rJ
cU
?=96--o;xa-<E;=
tt
ol
olot o
cl =
UIJJ
-l I(€l tr
Pl
=CJI OQlz
ttt
?l
6l
(!l>lqJl
'.Jlbl;lol
ol-n
=l;21
z tl-t5uNdF q.t
ffo.
:
I.t)
zIIJ
Fzf
x
Flat
Hl
=lot 9lt+lE'l (/,lgl?l
8l=lol clLt --)l
8l
3.:l
EIEI
al Elzl,3-l
x
tul
I
qrlt')|ol ?l
9t =l":l Plrl -lSlrl
A=lol clLt---)lct=l
Z tt)
:UNEF|rJ
ffo-
=I
--cv
-Fi \r'l
'.)-=r- e -. -,(i#a;E-t,-),n-U0JtAinOO
3-4TlX.=lsFlror'ra.r| | <- /,-.\ -l | -?-, | ___:tlEl -.a ry E :l '-F - A 1\-'El =t cd -l =F =- =ifl C-7 O ,5 7l .: .s .= € .a. ei'-11 =: -., i. lrll o-O aO )- -*,
.,1 --7 -F .=l \) .L .)L v-
-t -lU1I JI
z
z
ZN|rJtr
za-rt- 7
Fzg rrJ.YFa-z
z
('l N
FO-
Z
-JO
FO-
o
z tJ-)1uNsF|rJfft
:
I
o_X
.(J
U
c
>.
U
=
'
\.,
l--
.Y >. Ea'\t cc od>< --
'a--r.]J.^ cJ > o
tlJ Ln 9 ;i
t_ co g--
'iL-o E
.. ^ .! '.-Y.Y^Fc'.v!?oc= Y >!_J\ra-.r cn "! =rr' '- ll r-
-
(t)
z
z
tr
f
(n
z trJ:UNdF u.JrL
:
I
vu..i-'E; -*i*E : g i*
==.=\E',!C:F'==:; 8:sE =; t .-b;E = F q., 3 F =-Y: -- O.! c I c tr =-r-cD<.Y==:!E A:i:, !i = t- !-9: t!;5E =" e =-- ==.'.i -1 ,=.:3F i= : ='^i Y;': - E a" 10: o j : z ? - -=-.x n: F-O.= a>- - i = =€-Eg t;==b =-: ' =! =i=r-.=J^oF/1:c;5a-r='==cc!l ts ! - - 0., - - L c :=ii€ ;1*Ee +F= e -a
==E=o. .9 r:.=.ci -.'^ e -=
=;.> E.eL-60 lct . 1y ?=v(1)(tJai\Jl-J.i-JJ-c,'i9 E-Xq= Z.-d z z2 Z^q 7-; > -- :.i <o b: < b a-0,
ChIIJ
zIIJ
Fz:)
^l--l;lfil
l
-l I
t-l
ololnl
>l
rll 9l
al EtzlEl
o
IJJ
tt
75 south trontage road oftice ol community develoPmenl
Yail, colorado 81657
(303) 47!t-2138
(303) 479-2139
January 7, I99L
Mr. Mark MatthewsSIifer Management
L43 East Meadow Dri.veSuite 360Vai1, Colorado 8L657
Re: 770 Potato Patch Trash Dumpster Enclosure
Dear Mark:
Today the staff looked at your proposed dumpster enclosure and feel
that this will be a positive addition to 770 Potato Patch. You
stated that you wilt transplant the two srnall aspen trees and that
the roof of the dumpster will be shingles of the weight to equal
300 pounds per roofing square. You also stated that only two
dunpsters would fit in the dunpster enclosure and that the third
durnpst,er on the site would no longer be needed and would be removed
from the site.
The enclosure will match the colors and materials of the enclosure
on the transformer box and will be located next to the transformer
box.
Thank you very much for making this irnprovernent at 77O Potato
Patch.
Sincerely,
Betsy RosolackPlanning Technician
k"-. .--_
a- j
Project Application
770 POTATO PATCI{ TRASH DIJMPSTER ENCLOSURE
r/7 /9r
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
}IARK MATTHEWSContact Person and Phone
SLIFER MANAGEMENT 47 6-1063
Owner. Address and Phone:770 POTATO PATCH CONDOS
Architect. Address and Phone:
Legal Oescription: Lot Block Filing , Zone
-
Comments: nWPsrER ro MATCH THE COLOR AND MATERIAL 0F f,NE ENCLOSURE 0N TIIE TRANSFORMER
BOX AND TWO ASPEN TREES WILL BE TRANSPLANTED. ROOF WILL BE SIIINGLES OF WEIGIIT TO
FNIIAI. lON T.BS PFR ROOI'TNG SOTTARF.
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
oy:
Summary:
BETSY ROSOI-ACK rowffi
Date:
b a,",, Approval
ffin [i t. i.
*****THIS APPLICATION WII,L NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL ALL INFORMATIONIS SUBMITTED*****
r. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING:
A pre-application neeting wlth a planning staff menber isstrongly suggested to determine if any additl-onalinfornation is needed. No anpllcation will be acceptedunless it l"s cornplete (must lnclude all itens reauired bvthe zonincr adrninistratort. It is the applicantrsresponsibility to rnake an appointment with the staff to flndout about additional subnittal requirernents. Please notethat a COMPLETE application will streamLine the approvalprocess for your project by decreasing the number ofconditions of approval that the DRB rnay stipulate. ALLconditions of approval must be resolved before a buildingpenrit is issued. Application will not be processedwithout ownerrs Signature.
A. PROJECT DESCRIETION:
B. IPCATION OF PROPOSAL:
Address l10 \*+..** iJ". tc l"r
DnB APPIJICATfON
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED:
DATE OF DRB ITEETING:
l2-ts- 1o
d\^.fiDAM e r{.16t,,.ru - I\-.-l* .JL
BlockLega1 DescriptJ.on Lot
Subdivision Zoning
C. NN{E OF APPLICANT:
Mailing Address:
ItlS 2 ll.^/*r Ari.,. F36o i,'.*{Phone '179'lob3
D.NAl.tE oF AppLrcANT's REPRESENTATTVE: r{lark rxtrJ*o^"s
Mailing Address:
E.NAI1IE OF OWNERS:
SIGNArURE (Al !
uail-ing Address:
Phone
F. CondomLnium Approval lf applicable.
c. DRB FEE: The fee will be paid at the.tine a buildingpermit is paid for.
VALUATION
S o-S 1o,ooo
$1OrOO1 -9 50,000
S5o,oo1 -$ 15o,ooo
s150r001 - $ 500,000
95O0r001 - $l,OOO,ooO$ over $1r0oO,ooo
FEE
$ 1o.ooI 25.00
$ so. oo
$1.00. o0
s2 0o. oo
s3oo. oo
Phone
II. IMPORTANT NOTTCE REGARDING ALL SUBITISSIONS TO THE DRB3
A. In addition to neeting subrnittal requirements, theapplicant nust stake the site to indicate propertylines and bullding corners. Trees that will be renoved
must also be marked. This work must be completedbefore the DRB vlsl-tE the site.
B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS wJ-II normallylnvolve two separate meetl.ngs of the Design Review
Board, so the appllcant should plan on at least two
meetings for a final approval .
c. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design Revl.ew
Board at their scheduled rneetl.ng and who have not askedfor a postponement wlll be regulred to be republished.
D. At the dLscretion of the zoning adnlnlstrator, thefollowlng items nay not have to be presented to the
Design Review Board. They, however, have to bepresented to the Planning Department for approval:
a. Windows, ekyllghts and sLnilar exterior changesthat do not alter the existing plane of thebuilding; and
b. Bullding additions that are not viewed from anyother lot or public space, which have had letterssubmitted fron adjoining property owners approvingthe addition; and/or approval frorn the agent for,or manager of a condoninl,urn association.
E. You may be reguired to conduct Natural Hazard Studies
on your property (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, debrisflow, wetlands, etc). You should check with a Town
Planner before proceedlng.
l_
,
'" tsJg;
.ir"14 tl
a it-
r
i:
I
?t
J
L
.{.t
rfl<J
)osi
oW+.F .z:'tT)-$tI+ ()TLof8'1A>aJ
(-I
'+
c
g
Ir\)
Itlg
{8 ct-d :v:{:.\JI(,
t
*t
llf,
il
ft4V'e'>'
E'(, .l
l:-,/is.r !bgvr
o
t
U'i
i, 't-
t-r
L:-
Va
t*? i):. lJ1-n
ti
It{1ai!DIt!i
S hfef;\4 anag ement C offi ny
Property Management & Leasing
Decenber 17. 1990
Betsy Rosolack
Community Development75 S. Frontage RoadVail, CO 81657
Re: 770 Potato Patch Drive Dumpeter Encloeure
Dear Betsy:
As nanag€r for the 770 Potato Patch DrlveAssociation I can enaure you that the plan6 farenclosure have been approved by myeelf ae well asDirectore.
Thank you for your prompt conelderatlon ofPlease contact me lf you have any questlone.
Sincerely,
}lark l{athewsProperty Manager
iif'0 DEC 1 71s90
Condonlnlunthe dunpeterthe Board of
thls uatter.
143 East Meadow Drive, Suite 360, Vail, Colorado 8165?
Telephone: (303) 476-1063 TELEFAX (3O3) 476-2658
oz
tr
=EuJ
<
U'ltlulu-
E
=
UJ
'4Y+ta
o\
c!c\l
.it
x
z
at)
z
lor
ll.lJ F-
'- \'
r{
Fl
u,
6F; al)tr t-{O lrl(9rqzo
F
F
FI
==
(,zz
uJF
z
z
5
€
zz
N
llI FllI Fll>.{l Hlzt tlolrl
Al pll
E-rl cal
?t3lFfl C)ltutzlull lrl lTlzlFl'lIAIrdt rdllql c)I.lilHI AIJ*l
H el;
H (/:l r'lJ frIBFI FI EpJ U)l rdvJ o,l d<t >lI 5l rrlc.ll cl Fa
rrj@
i
(Eo(L
(ro
o
Fz
trllJz3otrulu
:=c(o
FI<FZrtYZ@<
p.{O&N
()FI
@!E c')tsdtH' .(/Jxo..AZtso.o><A<
oH
AF
z
tslFf()
-.: - o c
o - |! .Y'.:661?c;
sbE;$
F 9 R€!
EgE;E
€ UE:gE
:EFiE
; iF FE
::E?;
!Ea:e
E;;EEEiaeEaEa=io=-o"(u;:o-o
f t:'gE:EEP3:qD.eOOoo ! xlJ- c.y x ^o (E:'-:'
igE E;
.c=o(,c
ef;!r€ggl=3
O (5=; ru*eFli
*E;; I
iE$8fi
u''l coc-l o €
*
tr
=EUJ
(,zo
=
d)
YoluI(Jz
J
IEF
C)UJ
tr
z6
=fJ
=
o
UJ
ulTIJ
z
tr
LU
G,
C)
E
3uJtuJ
z
6UJ
6
tu
z F
luo
U)
UJ
uJlJ-
E
=uJ
J
F
F
zo
=
F
uJ
UJ
z oz
I
UJ
=
NOu.Vntv6D
tl
an
Fl
z
&
Hql
E
FlH
BZtL
6zr9
tr
utoJ
|l,z!J
N
C\J
=>G
= ,,,
z
-
'ao1>tc)<)zt!<
t!Yi6
'i <ri
tsU)
Xfrl
H
=rEl4{oU)
zl-{trr
ct)
FI
o('l
p
atto
z
E&
.J>z
H
zo
F
f
<
CE
o(l
uJ
o
o\
E
&
z
Eoo
*t4z
tr
uJF
BTIJz
I
trzlz
<oo<
>E>(lRrdo<z
:z
9z
*-O3trOI
tlrlllt-j--
illlFltz z
;ftelrJ1I t<ll5l3itotFltilill
!ll
ct
z
()
IF
(!
F
z
F
Jlaz
o3
a
o X
l
F
JI<t
F-l
zt
zl
.- >loluo
IIJ
UJzaF
El!
J
z
E
o
I
--l
xl_l
Io
z
t!
z
o-
tr,-<>og
(7r
I&
r,tr@
(J \{3O
Fl \!,
zHE
d
z..,9zz
>z
dY
)..i3l, \., =
==3= f!;oil>
tr!I
UJFo
Coo-z
FculY
uJdl ,-re3
=>F{EF.
uJo-n,lt alo<I
u- ololo4
'-1rl
UJbizo
=
tu
r!
UJoz
(n
g.
oF
do-
JFul-!r=
(}.uJ>o-OLoO\ul
^ll-x>EFJJ
uJc)
o
Eoeo
o
.E
E
Eo{,
o
ts
=E.lrJo-zIFofEFazoo
E
q)H
A
oH
HoP.i
oNr\
z
=u-
Jdl
F
J
frlHu)
E
tttE&c)tHvt<o
ozH Itl
ts
f\
.ll
El el .oZl Al \o
Qr Bl -rtot Iidl Al \oC)l <lHt 14+<t Et *
Ail IIrl
Hi ('1t<l .$lHl .{lot IELI |,I;t EdF.l d<:l eo!J>fl95 =E
uJ
o
2
=o
aPrE
tsHEv)
di
!!-
I(?)
z
ui
al>l
olzl3l
FI
c{
CN
r\
IItl\'co
F\rn
F.
Io\.it
c'r
r.riJllJ g,
tr
z
r,lJ
J
rl-
z3I =tr
o
olul
5
>l
r!lol
z13lI tr
olz.l
urlql
<l>l
rr-Iolzl
3lolFI
Eg
I
I
I
^l:l
EI
5l
<l>ltrlol2t ..:
il F
uJ
=z
(D
-'-'tI
IJJz
=
F
u.J
I()
E,
<FGC)ur<zE[!F(nZ
<o()F
t<
--25
t2P9?>c
d6
dx:<F><)4<iF
HZ>3
E
E i\9i
\rz
)<(Ja9.3E
/
rxt-r-]lxtLlL l
\.
(l"
\
l
ts
=Eulo.
;\i
ItiE
E rrErq\U z
\l\
/4. =t>)6\\t1}/ r
-E|',Iut,n
=lDn|
6 5 b\; - 6 z1: E EEofi! r:
zl
.. >l
uj
UJ|lJzot
UJ
J
z
F
{l
\l*l{l
ul
;1Iil
nel
RNoz
Jtr
I
I
5
e/
o'r
*
U
ih
\\
rt-\
ui
=zo
e
N$i
::q
6
0o
rJ}
s
o
.a
\)
tll
{ld
NI HIq
E3
^(
h
$
0S
I
'o
N
?l
:l
ol
H>l
l!l
:l
FI
oz
dul
.ElJ
ttq
zlBlI
-l
3uJlcl
J
flz
H
ol
=lol
sl
<l>l
rr.l
?l3lolH
<9z
6
=J
lu
o
z.n9zz@o
=zJO(l.l!
=f;;=xc)3;3
!trn
F
=Gu,o-ltoEgE3€fr39Eirb9'gE
E ;tE FE! 6tE ooE irt x>I EFsi
IIJ(0
oF
m\'\-,fi\=
Yzr=.-D!!
a
::
-L-
L:E!
UJEq
@o1zo
uJY
uldt
FF
uJott
co
C)
I
LlJFoz
ts
=Elrlo-zoFo
EFazoo
lt
J2u.o
1C+JdI
c
o(,rJ?| .r>J)10, 3,ofeFi3
,"11.:
&rl
I
t: .1'- I
*--- t
r!
Srsl
t
.*t
i.rn
s
s1-l
*l---l
75 south trontage road
t ail. colorado 81657(303) 479-2L38 or 479-2139 ofllce of communlty devclopmcnl
BUILDING PERI'|IT ISSUANCE TIME FMME
If thi.s pem'i.t fegurlres a Town of Vail fire Departnent Approval ,Eng'ineepts (Public llorks) review and approval,'a planning Departmentreview or Health Department review, and a review by the Building
Department, the estimated time for a total review may take as longas three weeks.
Al'l commercial (large or small) and all multi-family permits will
have tq follow the above mentioned maximum requirements. Residential
and smal'l projects should take a lesser amount of time. However, if
resi.denti.al or smaller projects impact the various above mentioned
departments wi.th reEard to necessary reviewn these projects mayalso take the three week period.
Every attempt wll'l be made by this department to expedite thispermit as spon as possible.
I, the undersi.gned, understand the p1 an check procedure and time
frame.
./ 4 (<t.7J
{A f.nc /o*t7'g-
z-r - //- ?/'
Communi ty Development Department.
75 south frontage road
vail, colorado 81557
(303) 479-21.38 or 479-2L39
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
olflce ol communlty development
ALL CONTRACTORS CI'RRENTLYL REGISTERED WITH THE
TOWN OF VAIL
TOWN OF VAIL PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MARCH 15, 1988
CONSTRUCTION PARKING & MATERIAL STORAGE
In sunnary,.Ordinance No. 6 states that it is unlawful for anyperson to litter, track or deposit any soil, rock, sand, debrisor rnaterial , i-ncluding trash dunpster-, portable toilets andworkrnen vehicles upon any street, sidewalk, a1ley or pubtic
P1?9e or any portion thereof. The right-of-way on al1 Town ofVaiI streets and roads is approxinately 5 ft. 6ff pavernent.This ordinance will be stri--ly enforced by the Town of Vailny!]ic works Department. persons found vi6]ating this ordinancewill be given a 24 hour written notice to remove-said rnateriaL.fn the event the person so notified does not conply with thenotice within the 24 hour tirne specified, the pulfic WorksDepartment wilL remove said material at the expense of personnotified. The provisj.ons of this ordinance snlff not beapplicable to construction, naintenance or repair projects ofany street or alley or any utifities in the right-a-way.
To review Ordinance No. 6 in full, please stop by the To$rn ofVail Building Departroent to obtain I copy. tirank you for yourcooperation on this natter.
Position/Relationship to Project
^./+ -//' 7/
Read and acknowledged by:
oro /-ac l6t-
Po s i t i o n,z R e I a t lo-s hi p-(i.e. contractor, owner)
ilINSPECTIONTOWN OF
,, i,
REOUEST.
VAILPERM
DATE
T NUMBER OF PBOJECT
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTI THUR @
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDEBGROUND
tr BOUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
r-1 ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL / H. TUB
FINAL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
PROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
D^rE& rNSPEcroR
oz
F
=t
IJJo-
cccc
(f)
ooo
o(o
ooo
Orf)(\.1
ooo
c>c)
an
IJJ
UJlt
tr
=tllJo-
t'- {wJ- E8/ L/Q \oer hl Fzn,w
U'ulFozoz6J
6-o
=zoN
EEEEg
iiiii
cI
c44(cF
tJ)
st
(v)
u)
r.o
oo
c)
LO(\t
o
oo
(n
(ofo(or-{(\l
oO
oO(Y)
c)ooolf)
oqcoot(:.-l
o
IJ,)H
mtra
r-iE
I
U
trt
lltc
zoI
(o
-
uJ-
z
J
F
uJ
UJ
gz
aoz
o-
J
9z
()ul
UJllJlrz
F
uJe
uJE
6
=ul
UJgz
tt
UJ
Evtoo-ulo
o-
2
uJ
C)
x
F
ulu,
ar>llJuJ
FtE\uloJ
FoF
I
$i':.-
I\Ctxo
^t-<E
,112
lE
l€,2t9
I
(,zoJ
.D
J
IEFc)uJJuJ
oz
t
E
2-ouJ
=
NOIVn]v
I
IcIc+
!.t(
"=
+
:
(c
-
=Z.ZtLo ootr ^ 6zI5 =eE I oE
ooE5d llezXl.L<oq iTF fraXz
r(\t(,
\l
:=J: <t.;o
=uJ6i=aON
I(ut-(5(J
oa
rt
C\,I
t.r,r-l
1r-l
an+t
c5
tt6o!-.d
ooo.
z
tr
tJ
F
oo
c
uJo"
F
c
(t
o-
IJJ
z
Eoo
z
E
UJFJ
x
;uJz
JIla2i
=F
eHgg
td I tl
2-!,g2 3=d.
*EEEE
z9
E-)f
U>z
u,l
?e
Or olr{(Y)
F
ul:E
><
;;
tuJ|lJ
o
3
J
uJzt
=F
(o r.o AIFl
ococ(Y
I
lrJo.+)PiUca
P+tit'co
+,+.'(u
ca
3E=bdiEut
F{
GOo
F{('6
C\Icl
IF\IN
UJE
@t0o-zoFo-
lrJY
ullo
oFF
Eulo-
I,Lo
o-oo
I
uJFoz
tr
.Eulo.l!oEE2ZE<ol€uB9!a
5g9'J,
=ut:-E FEE =*E 65E FuE XT6, uloiarE
UJ.0oF
---
F
=E,lrlo-z9FofEFazoo
uJF
o
ryrn
z
oP
=e60
=zl=d9
:F*
;Hg
EER
I
olurlGI
-rl<l>l
tl-lolzl3lolFI
z
ultr
J
l!
z
=oF
I
I
I
el
cilr.ul
:l>l
bl
fli
fl8l
-.d
oz
J
lJ-
lo
I
I
I(ol
IF
J
!
(,
+J.lJ6-
o.tJ(o+,oo-
oNr\
ui
=zoo-t
"ll
t
9P
s3
'Fd6o
z
T
ut
=
l-t. iruri*E ,o2
()
s
^f)
t\Jtu
i(to
TEoF()-(GFzo()co
Gulztodt! uto=
aoI lrlFI<F7oYZo<
-$ili*[[ilr.;ic!.r:Yi
*sHs:s:esU
€*E.:$
:$i:E:€EEE'- (}G --E si 5'a
EFA$g
Et;EI
.E!s'EE
ET 9:T
f*gg$v9'leooii.rr E lioi Fi d paiEg€
:s€sErJ o-i F.(:= C, t,, c
$tE Ef
s g lE:-3:4n9.
EiE:E
eesii
N
a
\
\
\6
I
<t)u.,t!TLL
LU
o
l-
(rtuo-
antuFoz(,zoI:)(o
c(lo
=zoN
a/,
LU
LUtLL
lJl
J
FoF
E
Jf,
I
iI
!:
I
Orrvnlv
oz
o(!J
-J
o
7-
;i
l-
zoP
(Do
=z\:tl
z
=ccul6-t!.o..u,r:()2zE<n-f,entt-;:o.::: t-\,G
t:Il>l-J; lr.ll:F() ul()d
-oi;o
L:, 5iio.i utjii
ru'(o
oF
(r
ll
C.
=
-tIL
ii
'. t-
oFt,J.(
G.t-.
()
t:
t4
-1(t
t.-
()
a)
ltJ:Il-o
4
12:.ti:<)lll
Eulz.
o
t.:(, (JZts-
:: '{-, Ca)r-
rL()()
-,, o<( t-(t a-)ur<
u, |"-(, i',()()
t-(.)
lrl
J:(J
Ct:.(
-trc.{Oc) t-i;,'i
Hi!#
lt..;ll\nI '4 rtI r\ lFI lo lg
liH$I 'i5 t5ra!
;Ii gEsFs
Yfl 6.o (J ! 2
Elill{luclclolf
*lsl:liEl9l:il:
tH t
ZZtLo oqtr ^ 6zq 5 >eE I oE
60e,Zs()oo:4(JzXiL<-
;TF
ut t-l l-2**olir::; (,N
1ii
.,..|
tl
u-).-lc)r-l.Jcl
ltF
o
rl
n .f-)
z3
Itl!a
.Il
?
t)J
l-c
tco
I
u,Foz
t;
ry
UJf)-
C)
t--()
F--eo'i,
(-)
()
'0nedforcondominiums,andtvhichplairrtiffp
as a condominium project. A copy of the contrict is attachec
hereto ancl incorporated herein as Exh;bit,,A,,and a ccipy of
^uhe note is attached hercto and incorpor-ated lrerein as'
tExhibi t "Bu
4. Under paragraOn@of the contract the par-;ies agrec:l {
that as part of the consideration for tlre corrtract the
p lai nti f f rvoui d 5ecei ve f rom the cref endan^.- a r ea se of
certain land located next to lot 6 io be used b5r
for development of recreational anrenities (r.rh.ich
is referred to hereinafter as tlre,'rec:-eational I
a condition to plaini,iff's receiving such a leatc
fract requi red pl ai nti ff to obtai n an for ir i s
rccreational amenities from the Tor.,rn of Vail and f ro rrr the
p'leintiff
said land
ands"). As
the con-
ri ifcr'dani.---,,.--.--5. under paragraph r{Aof the contrac-u the parties aqree.'
ihat as part of the consjderetion fur. the contr.act t.he
p'l a,niiff l'rould receivr-, i'ron defenri ant <rn cirserrsni, ovir
l;rnct in th. vicinity oi'Lot 6 fol: inst.r'l r;,iion ;f r sili-ri
t.ypo of cOnveyancer tO l;e rr sed to 'uranSpor,r plopl c i,o.t.!,,3?n
Loi 6 and'chc v.riley bclor.l . As a. conci ition to i:ra.i nrif.r"'s
it
rece l vl ng
p'laintiff
pl an fronr
A/-va b- YlD<l
a(nenities
i,intjff's ;-_,'l an
l:irS lreCti Undcf
such an caselient the contracl. requ.ireC tr: i.t
obtain obt.rin approva'l of his trtnspcrtarion
;he Tol.rn of Vai I and f ron the dcf endant.
ior cievelcplrent of t.he recrc.tiunh(:l
\
consirjeration by thc T_ot,rrr oi Va:l ./
set
r sincr jt r.ras subr;ritted by plairrtif f ,in _J-q!S-:-SZ6 ->---'t
--fiTl:T-crnrri IOR RTLIEF
Aili:gations7. Pl,.:jniiff incorpo)"(-lles hcrein thc General
fcrrtlr atrovC.
P.0n rr ahr.rut irpril .l5, l9frO defendant notificd plcintiff
it t'lou'l d not perforrn under the aforementioned paregraph l2aI
A
:
\
I
:h
Ir
t
t
t\ll't
u
.t,': (-
,/VI) ,'\f
1l,l '
l,' J l"
,\' r\ ,' Ir# !
,,",rt"I *'nn r^,./fi:r,,4Ln(li
ti"'
?'
of tri,: contract, and, hy such n\tice, defendant iotally
repud,;itcd paragraph 12 of said contract.
,)^ Plajnti'ff's plan for deve'lopment of ihe recreational
]
I ands has becn submi tted to the Tor'ln of Vai,'l f or i ts 6pproval '
in accorcl ance brj th terms of the .co
donc and perf ormed, and i s ready tl'i I I i ncl and 'rhl o tn ..lovpr nn
thc recreational land as p'l anned by constructjng thereon
two tennis courts, a racquet ball court, a badminton court'
five squash courts, a tetherball area, a heaith facility'
a vollcy ball court, a tot 1ot, a skate board serpentin6,
picnic tables and other amenitjes the planning of r'rhich
p'lai,:'..iff accornplished at a cost to hjm of $.l0,000.00; and
p1air,.'i f i rrould develop t,he recl:eat'ional 'lands as planned
excei,i ft;r defendant's refusal-tq abidc by the contract'
I {r. 3y rcason of the premi ses pi a i nti ff lras been danagei
'in ^uhe sun of $250,000.00 generai cl;mages and Sl0'000'00
spcr-ii: d;,maqcs.
SECOIiD CLAII.i FOR RELIEF
1.l. i'laintiff incorporates hcrein the General Allegations
iItI
i
;
I
i
,,
t
.--&
set forttt above.
12. Io induce
defcndant, bY its
Andrevt D. I'lorris,
nei er and others ,
plainLiff (a) that
I arrds to pl ai nti f f
recreati onal arlen i
intendcd to grant
pl aintjff to enter into the contraci'
of f i ccrs , etnp loyees and a5;ctlts , J in Sheehan,
Jack llarshall, Jack Acuff , Roir':r Till;.e-
fal sely and fraudul ently represetited to
dcfcrr clant intendcd to lcasc.the recreational
for the purpose of plainiiff's consiructing
tics thercon, and (b) that defendant
an easerlent to Plaintiff on and
lands for the purpose of plaintiff's installinq a
over
ski-l
certai n
ift
made
or to
type of conveyanccr thcreon. Sa'id representations t'tcrc
on no less than fivc occasions in t|arclt, 1975, irrst lrri
perforrrcd all thq conditi
I
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Environmental Conunission
Community Devel opment Department
August 8, ]984
A request to amend 0rdinance 30, Series ofnumber of units allowed to be coniiruiieo|"iyq, from 30 plus an emptovee-unit"ii-goApplicant: Ed A. Smith
1977 to increase theat 770 Potato patch
plus an employee unit.
I.
The applicant is requesting to increase the number of allowed units from 30 plusI caretaker unit to'lg_nrJi i-.;;;i;k;; unit on-iot-6,-Bi;;k z, vair potato patch.The 770 Potato Patch clLb-p"6i..i-*ii-down-zoned by 0rdinance 30 in 1977 to a'owa maximum of 30 units whirb ritiining the^MDNF zone district. In October ofl98l the owner requested an ilffi"ni io o.ainuniJ-go i6.iion on. additionaremployee unit. The amendment wai approuga.. presentry, phase I of the projecthas been completed.
^16 ;;it; iirr-ifi""i.retaker unit-have been buitt. The 0r-dinance would allow for in iaaiii6nii'-tl units to be constructed for phase II.The applicant would lir<e-io-irieio-ii"iirJ".e 3o io iirow ai iooitionat 6 unitsto be built in phase Ir withoui"goini';u"r the atowed GRFA.
A.ljgant's Rationale for the Additional Six Units
]ff i:3llii:r"$Iil:'that the benerfts of the proposed amendment far outweish
]H lf;:']iir3*tlf amendment and thus the approval or the new plan for phhse rr
l' A substantial increase in the amount of open space availabre for land-scaping. The amount^or_site-covgi;ng n.l' ueen'reJuceJ'iro, the previousPhase II plan bv,3,3g9 sq. rt. itre'total site coverage of the 770 projectwiil be 22% of itre'iile fp opior"l-to 2a % for the oiisinar proposal.The allowed coverase in ih"-F;i;;;ylieilnairv"iorlj=airiiict which isadjacent to the siie ii iiit,;il-i'hlretore the revised pran wiil be morecompatible with the sur"ounding-n"i'dhoo"r,od' ;r';;;;"oI op"n space and1 ands cap i ng.
2' A reduction in the proposed GRFA. The revised pran for phase II isplanned to contain-l glqo gt-ll',isz'rq. ft as opposed to the at.lowed24,216 sq. ft. This.reduction 6i-i,659 sq.-it.'fiiii-reiurt in the project-tglfujrinq,less buirding.ruri tiin'irre previous pran, even though therewr | | be additional dwelling unili. -'
3' The number of bedrooms within the project will increase in phase II from42 previousrv oroposed to 44.'-il; i;'not berieve that i additionar bedroomswill signifiiairttj, iiier-any'or"if,l"aspects of the project.
770 Potatltch -2- 8/8/84
In summary, I think you willat which 0rdinance 30 of lg77
find if you read the minutes of the meetingwas adopted and also the intent of ttre-Ori.inancew v I r,trs va tl
tH:.:!!-Hfrl-Tg!::-sood_sense and' does no_t do unvir,ing-;o violate orjeopardize the Ordinanc6. Th9 proposat,-in"ii.il ilfi:;"i":.;;;;;;r:i;
a
more conformity and compatibility with the existing-niiitio"nood than didthe previous design.
ln 1977 when the Ordinance_placing the unit restriction upon the propertywas adopted, the Planning Directoi stated at ifre'iir"-if,ii',itf,.-phriiiil,an.ongoi.ng one, designed to manage growth gs oppoiea-ti"ijntioiring-growih."This indicates that the intent wis iertainti nbi-tJ-p"ini[it a certain amountof flexibititv and abirity for.re-evaruatio-n or certlin-ii"i"is-oi-prJp."iv''through time as is requested with this proposit.--l,le-ueriEve tnat the under-lvi.ng MDMF. zone district designation a'liowi urat riexiuiiiiv wttn this siteand that the proposal crearly-presents some positive reiuiis.
3.92 acres
.22 acres
3.70 acres
oRp. 30
56,4.|0 sf
3'l units
GRFA 32,194 sf
GRFA 24,2'16 sf
56,410 sf
'l 70,755
9,583
161 ,172
I'IDMF Z0NE
56 ,4'10 sf
66 units
sf
sfsf
Phase I existing units
Phase II allowed units
Total units
t7l4
3l
II.
Lot Size
Area over 40% slope
Buildable area
MDMF GRFA
Total Units
al I owed
Phase I existing
Phase II allowed
Total GRFA
770 Potato put.l- B/B/84
BACKGROUND ON THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW30 UNITS }JITH MDMF Z0NING FOR LoT 6
The purpose of the Growth.Management project wal to identify properties thathad inconsistent zon'ins with tFe surrouniins i"isibo"ffi;';i ;"ii-;; i; ".riavp!evj.g.r{: zoning_prob1.ems. In r970, when-th6^proiertv wii innexeo by the Town,the MDMF zone altowed 'il7 units roi Lot o. Oiig:inaiivl-ini"suu.o*mittee discussedrezoning the property to Residential Cluster. itre pfinninq and Environmentalconrnission voted for a compromise betwein the sudiommilii."uno-,:orir Hiii-iJ*r."1that wou'ld maintain the MDMF zoning but limit ttre unit-nuriulr to so. It wasfelt that the Potato Patch area had a iharacter that reflected *o". expeniiv"and-larger l,grgs. By keeping the MDMF zone, the owner was allowed the neededGRFA to build large units'cofrpatible wiitr ihe-iur"ounaing-u..u.
III. lltoJEcT CoMPARTSoNS
The following figures compare the original phase II to the proposed phase II.
A. DENSITY
Uni ts
GRFA
Ori gi na] Phase I I
l4 units
24,216 sf
Proposed Phase II
20 units
22,557 sf
Di fference
6 units
1,659 sf
The new proposal stays within'thu ullowed GRFA andtne orrgjnal proposal's GRFA.
is actually 'l ,659 sf under
B. SITE:>
;rli.
Existing Phase
phase
Ori s i nal
22,252 sf
Total s i te coverage '4'l ,041 sf
Site Coverage % Z4.O "l !
'18,789 sf .
III 22,252 sf.|5,400 sf
37,652 sf
22.0 %
The difference between the two. proposals' site coverage is 2%, or 3,3g9 sf.IF^":l Pro!9la]'s-decreasedsite cbverage is achi.u"a''uy ientralizing the buildingmass 1n 4-unit buildings rather than diipepsing the rniis-ih.orghout the slie ina townhouse fashion- Both proposals are'well inder it"-iriowed-MDMF site coverigeot 45il or 76,840 square feet.
770 e{o Patch -4- B/B/s4
C. HEIGHT
The.orig'inal proposal for Phase II had heights that ranged between 20r to 32.5rfeet. The units located between Potato. paicn orive unJ-tn" north interiorroad had two stories facing potato patch Drive. 0n ail siae iiiini fi;'-'interior road three storiei existed with the tower'tevit being buiit-intothe ground. The units would also be stepping up-tne-rriirsiae"to-ir"ui.-'a terraced appearance and to minimize the view br tne units from potiioPatch Drive. The units located between ttre iwo-ini.ii6" rouo. were to betwo story units with a maximum he.ight of 22.5 feet r. -
Il !n".revised proposal, the four buildings wil'l28.5r to 34.5 r ft. The four single uniti on thewill have heights ranging from 23.5t to 26t. feet.of the buildings (in both cases) are on the south
have he'i ghts ranging betweennortheast end of the project
The highest portions
sides of the bui'ldings.
In respect-to impacts.of height, the original proposal locates the unitscloser to potato patch Drivel However, lne ,ais-6i-th"';;i;s is brokenup into triptex and duplex_units. The revised nrgpoiii remJv"s the mijorityof units away from pothto. patch Drive (20 fi-io'g56-fi rrim-roio) ex.eii '-"
the single units on the northeast iorner of the site.
staff believes that although the heights for both buildinss are within theallowable heishts for the MDMF zone (ss rt rrii-iooii,-iri"it-siopjrid'iojir),the.revised proposal will have a greater height impaci ar" io the c6ntraliiitionof buildings on the site.and the lreater_treilnts. 'tn tne-originat propos;i;- -
the units were terraced into the aite. The riass or-ir,e uuiiaings wts-iiio.6rotenup into duplex and trip'rex units. By comparing ttre iiie-ioverale ror uniis-in"-each proposal, the diffbrmce in mass-ing ii fui[h;;-d;ii;eJ:'
oriqinal Phase II Site coverage
Large triplex
Tri pl ex
Dupl ex
Medium Duplex
Sma11 Duplex
Revised Phase II
4,465 sf
3,540 sf
2,930 sf
2,476 sf
2,448 sf
Site Coverage
6,424 sf
6,424 sf
2,552 sf
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
I
I
2'l
Building 1
Building 2Building 3 (4 single
units)
The largest lripl_gx in the griginal proposal has a site coverage of 4,465 s.f.compared to Building One's (the reviied'proposal) site-coveiag6 or 6,424 s:i'.'The mass must be considered when. compartirg tne two proposals,-treignii.- ft,""difference of 1,e59 sf between the ti,ro i;is;;i uiiirIirbi-io, eaih"pioj..i"-is.significant enough. to-i.ndicate_that the revised proporui wi'll hive-greaterheight impacts. The buildings witt appeai t; be ta;.g;i-in il,. reuisea"p.6iilardue to the combined result oi massing'inO t"lgntr.
, :.
SETBACKS
The required setback of
each proposal .
PARKING
Total Required Parking
Original Phase II
28 spaces
770 Potatoftch -5- B/B/84
20 feet on al'l sides of the property is maintained in
D.
E.
A1l 28 spaces for the original Phase II would
Phase II provides 24 garage spaces, 14 earthparking spaces
Under MDMF zoning, 50% of the required parkingor be hidden from public view by a landscaped-parking requirement.
Proposed Phase II
40 spaces
be garage parking. The proposed
covered spaces, and 2 surface
must be located within bui'lding(s)
berm. Both proposa'l s meet this
F. SITE PLAN/LANDSCAPING
The revised proposal provides approximately 3,399 sf + of additional ,open space forthe project bv massing the new irn'its into + main-uuitatng giorpi-iioni5iliniffi-itiliLl.Extra open_space is also achieved by removing an inteii;i ioad that connects phas6 Ito Phase II, and by shortening a roid leadin! to the caretaker'i unii'ano iervii"area.
The proposed.Phase II has a new road cut that provides access into Phase II onthe north side from Potato Patch Drive. 'The pi.evious rcjad into the.;prcject becomesa dead end. Access between Phases I and II iir ttre current propoiat is iossiOie-onty;by using the pedestrla1 yalkways. ^The.proposal results in a 37 unit prbject hiving-three separate access drives oit of potito'patch Drive.
The amount of landscaping remains relatively the same in each proposal . Bothproposals include a seriis of ponds that fllrw ihrough tne-pioi6ci'near the-swimmingpool area.. Existing aspen groves on the northern edge of the-site are a'l so maintainedrn.each s]te plan. The revised proposal does create a stronger landscaped bufferbetween Phase I and Phase II. Tire briginal proposal estauiiitres a strohg, Iindscapedbuffer between the road and the north iide of phase It.
770 Potato l.n -u- g/B/84
IV. CRITERIA
The relationship to oJhgl uses and structures in the vicini
The degree to which relief from the strict or literal inte retationof a spec'ified regulation is necessar acnl eve t a uni formi tof treatment amonq sites in vrctn or to attain the o ecf,t ves of thistitle without grant of spbtiaf-piTvTTege.
1.02 acres, 44,431 sf
LDMF Zone: Allowed 9 unitsRestricted to 8 units , 2 of which must be. employee units
The variance criteria is being used to ana'lyze.this proposal because, a1 thoughthe applicant is requesting an amendment to 0rdinance 30, the r:elated issues-are similar to those issues concerning a zoning variance. when the 30-unit re-strict.ion was p'l aced on 770 Potato Patch, the impacts of 30 units on the surroundingneighborhood were addressed in depth. Staff feels that the variance review orovideian appropriate format for discussing the impacts of the applicant,s request.
The.property is surrounded. by-Agricu'ltural/0pen space zoning and primary/Secondary
res'idential properties. The fact that both proposals are ciose to the ZbZ sitecoverage maximum for the.surrounding. properties (zoned Primary/Secondary) suggests!!1! bot! proposals would be compatible with the adjacent arei.. The diiierence lnGRFA of l'659 sf is negligible. The height of the new proposat:is;lii g""ii"" thunthe original proposal
The revised proposal will add an extra road cut to the project, decrease internalcirculation by taking out an interior road, and centralize-buiiding il;a i;-4clusters. . The revised proposal is diffgrent fromPhase I in that miss and bulk isgreater with the 4-unit condominium buildings as opposea to the approveJ-to*:"ii"townhouse type units.
Differences between the two proposals are not felt to b. n"...ririly negative.Both-site_plans have merits. However, because the site piin tras ueln rivisea-to allow for2.0% Iess site coverage than in the originai proposat, it doei-notwarrant the project receiving an extra 6 units.
and enforcement
Ordinance 30 was developed with the intent to strive to treat property ownersequitab'ly and to manage growth in a reasonable on-going way. The 30 unit limitfor Lot 6 was not arrived at in an arbitrary way. -surioJnfing properiiei anJ '
the fair treatment of the ottner's rights we-r'e cbnsidered when-t'ne itnat aO unit
figyig_Iur,decided upon by the Town council in 1971. eiven-tne history or inisoeclsron, rt would be a grant of special privilege to al low the 6 extri units.
After brfefly researching.other properties zoned by ordinancesthat limit thenumber of allowed units, it became bvident that thLre are otheiprbperties itratcould make a similar request to increase their number Jtlirowed units.
Exampl es:
vacanl
770 Potato 3n -r- B/s/84
The additional road cut would create a safer egress and ingress for cars goingto Phase II but at the same time, could.compJidate lngress"and egress to fne l.site by having three separat€ road cuts. ,"
Removal of the internal .road connect'ing Phasesl and II wi'l 1 provide more landscapedarea. However, it creates a situation-where visitors to 770'potato patch whotake,the.wrong entry into the project will heve to turn around, exit onto potatoraf,cn ur]ve, and re-enter the site on the upper entrance. Internal vehicularcirculation in a 3l unit project.is certainii an achievable-goal. The removalof the internal road may create some traffiicongestion in-p6ase I occasional'ly.t.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recomends denial of the request to add 6 units to Phase II of 77O PotatoPatch club. It is felt that the revised site plin does not-warrant the additional!!itl: Allowing the 6 units is considered to be i g"i.t oi ipecial privilege,-'as all-property owners have restrictions placed on ih. numuer'or uniis'ttrai'ineyare allowed to build. This is the zoning system which the corrnunity tras aaoflei,endorsed and built under for.l] yeais. it itre-iEc una corniil find-merit in'iiudvingzoni.ng systems which a'llow addjtional density on multi-ramliy sites for certain-trade-offs, then we can"proceed toward that irnd. Hor"u"",'iir"i"niiv *" rrti-p"oceed fy:::i:i:9,lli:_lp?tication undei existi.ns_zonins resulations. To srant the sixun.lf,s wolJld set a orecedent that wou'l d allow a]l pioperty owners io request to increasethe number of uniti approved fo; iilii property. 'Given iteie
'"eusons,
staffrecommends denial of the request.
a
Patch:.997 acres, 43,429 sf
MDMF zone: Allowed 17 unitsRestricted: 8 units
2.89 acres, I25,932 sf
LDMF Zone: Allowed 26 unitsRestricted: l6 units
effect of the uested variance on 1i t and air distribution of ul ationtransportation a raftlc es and utpubl ic safety.
ore properties probably exist that are under these same conditions.Many special development districts have these characteristics as wel'l . It isevident that it would-be.a.grant_of special privilege to allow one propertyowner thg benefjt of 6 additional units and hot allow the opportunity to oinerproperty owners limited to-a specific number of units. ln hiaition, those propertyowners who have already built out their projects would not be able to take id-'-vantage of additional units in most situitions.
Potato
Villa I 3th:
z,
JCL
UJF
a/,
J
z.
(.'
O
*+
\NS
-,SN
Js]S
€-.
This is from the PEC meeting Zt 8/13/84. Memberspresent were: Duane Piper, gtrna1 ,^Gordon pierce,
Jjrft Viple, Diana Donovan and Eoward Rapson T 8/13/84 -2-
was recommending tabling until the appf icant
He added that the applicant had left a phone
not get to the meet'ing, that a work session be
Piper asked for an explanation of the final landscaping, and Richard Heller, the
appl icant, stated that on the street side there wouid be terraces with flowers andshrubs. Nelson King, who is the architect on the project, stated that he would workwith the Town engineer. Piper felt that the current berm and landscaping was a nicebuffer, and so it was important to know what the new landscaping would be. The heightof the'terraces was discussed and Patten read Sections 18.58.020 A & B. Nelson
King repeated that it would also depend upon what the Town engineer required.
Viele moved and Rapsgn seconded to approve the variance requests because the granting
tsin the vjcin'ity, and the variance was warranted because there were exceptions orextraoldinary circumstances applicable to the site of the variance that did not applygenerally to other properties in the same zone. The vote was 5-0 jn favor.
Pierce forwarded to DRB the concern that there should be more accurate drawings,
because he felt the scale of the buildings was not accurate.
No. 4 on the agenda was to be considered last.
5. Request for exterior alteration in Commercial Core II in order to remodel the
Tom Braun explained t,hat the staff
re-subrnit a complete appl'i cation.
message that stated that if he d'id
sc hedul ed.
9qnovqn moved and Pierce seconded to table this jtem until the applicant submitted
TeETe. '
A=fequest to amend 0rdinance 30, Seri es of .l977 to increase thg qqnb3ruf units
al l,
Applicant: Ed A. Smith
Kristan Pni tz explained the request, and stated the applic.ant's ratjonale for the
requested 6 additional units. She presented project comparisons between the
approved original project and the proposed project inc1 uding density, site coverage,height, setbacks, parking, site p1ans, landscaping, and arch.itecture. Pritz thenused variance crjteria to analyze the proposal and l isted other properties zoned byordinances that limited the number of illbwed units, adding that these properties could
make simjlar requests to increase their number of allowed unjts if jt could be justified
by the site plan. Pritz stated that the staff recommended denial because to grant
the request would set a precedent, because the revised site plan djd not warrant theadditional units, and it would be a grant of special privilege.
PEcl- 8/1s/84
Peter Jamar,,. representing the applicant, showed a model of the originalproposal. He reviewed the background of 770 potato patch and remiiaea tneboard that when 770 Potato Patch was annexed in 1970, ll7 units cou.ld havebeen constructed. rn 1977 this was down-zoned to a maximum'of 30 uniti. -He
added that in the '1977 minutes, reference was made to the fact thai ttrts processwas an "on-going'9ne,.des'igned to manage growth as opposed to coniroiiinb-----growth." Jamar felt_that zoning covered more than juii ttre number of unils.He added that in'1977 the appliiant saw fit to limii the numUer ot uniii. -rne
applicant did not have a problem because he intended to build targe-tuiurious-Yfils. Jamar pointed out that Phase I was not that successtut ini-.it-*ii i"itthat smal'ler units would market more successfulty, ana-ii-iotat couid il-buiiiwithin the allowable-density and he.ight restrictions. He pointed out inal -
the reduction in GRFA proposed did lessen the mass, the siie piil il; iliinitelvimproved, as was the parking._ He stated_that the new proposai only added i"o-'bedrooms and that 4 more people were really not ttrat signiiicant.
Jamar also pointed out that cascade, the Mamiott, and the sonnenalp all hadbeen awarded increased density. Jamar felt that ihe new site piin ias'i oeiinitebenefit to. the neighbors. Bulf Arnold, architect tor itre- new'pr,JsJ,-poini"a '
out that there was less mass when the project was viewed as a whole. - ite felithat Phase II was less dense with more'meiningful open spice, ttrat even-ttrJujnthe buildings were larger., in terms of scale iere nbt thet sjgnificinirv aiiilrentfrom those in the first phase, and in fact one building in ine rtrii prrise - '
was larger in mass.
Piper read a letter in opposition from John Thomas.. Ga[y Bossow adjacent propertygllgt: g1!-also-representing.t'tarter. and Grasis, other adiacent property owireri,
I:ug u retter of opposition in which he stated that they had a'li plrchisedtherr property on the basis of present day zoning, that more density wouldreduce property values.
Pierce felt that the color of phase I made the project look larger than itwould have to. He had a hard time relating to b aiaitionit uniis, but liked
tl,q n"ry site plan and the reduction in GRFI. viele siaiea tnat rris-iompinv-did.extensive repair to phase I, but had no financial interest in phase'Iilviele shared Gordon's views regarding the density tncreiii,-ilre ippeirinie':1'l!::" i:-tlg,improvement in-the site pran, inlreiseJ-ieiuacrs hha improveaparKln9, but felt general'ly favorable toward the proposal .
Eaplgn liked the revised,p'lan, especially the idea that some parking was accessib.leto the public' but wasn't sure it warra-nted 6 extra units. bonovai telt itrii-'the project had a much.greater impact from a distance than from up close, thiiflom below the new buildings woulbn't show at alt, and she tett ihai lr,"'uiri"iit,out we'ighed the_disadvantages. she pointed out that there were no requestsfor variances, less GRFA, Iess site loverage, an earth covered parkinq area.and.that.the project was responding to national economic crranqe!-iih".li"IIiunrts had been for Mexico.City residents who were no longer avaitdute). donovanwas'in favor of having a document filed that itatea cleaily ttrat invJie rfro'-'-"bousht would be informed that they could not add additionai tinFA.-i1i*lt'n"point"a*:'!hll-tlis tvpe of document if easirv chailengeabre in court and possibrywould not stand a court test.
less sit ra
cou
square
t, -u- 8/i3/84
earth cove rki n varl ances were reguested, and thezeoeach unit was It nati ona I ecohomic TfiEnq;t;:ilTT theuest that a ar oocument be sot ers wou t any addit ona'lwo5stthat the
and request additional
cument mentio, but t n-gtrts ot individuals
away. )footage could not be taken
not
ha
o
The vote was 4 in favor with I (piper) against.could have been achieved without iircreasing the
Piper felt the same improvements
number of units.
7. A uest for exterior alterations in Commercial Core I for the Hill Bui l diaanq to seco oor res nti aspace.pp r i cant:
Kristan Pritz presented the request explaining that it was in compliance with theintent of the zonjnq.for the -cci-iiiliict, aid with the urban Design Guide ptarland Desisn consideritions. -rn"-itaii-""co'irenaaiton fi; ;;; upprovil wi*,-+ eisineerinsconcerns to be resolved.before-u-[riiaing p_eryit would be issued. The issues Jinclude: t. Drainaoe wtji re-rnsi;;';i"Eriiaing, 2.'iriiuni..ot an improvement survey,3.' issuance of a r6vocauie-righ;-;;-;ay-permit for existing improvement in theright-of-wav, and 4. .. the .encr6achment 6r"iooi-or"irrirrii''i,ljit be resotved by anagreement letter of the adjacent properiy owner.
Jay Peterson, reDresenting the app.l icant, stated that an interjor drain would be installedand he talked a iittle aooui'[r,""ii.i"ii;t the rown ot vail did not plow this area,but that VA and Hit't Buitding onn.ri-aij.
Pi erce
po i nted
had no
v
4
suggested turning the.roof 45". Donovan didn,t like Iosing the views, piperout that given the direction rrom itre douncir conce"ning-it"r" views, heproblem with this concern.
8.
'|le moved
uest
and Ra son seconded to
tz
approve the
a0dress
uest with the condition that alltems o concern sted by Pr vote was 5-0 in favor.
tion o
for accommodation g4it condominium conversions for the phase IIottor! a onsheacl Circle alopment D 7.plicant:rporati on
uest for accommodation unit condomi ni um converlion of the Vai'l Ath'leticatAqt Meadow Drive.p I l Cant:e vat I ulu
Jay Peterson' representing the applicant,.requested to. table.this. item indefinitely.:-, ii;; "
9.
I:!:l-PllFn explained that this condominiunization was to further divide the condo-mlnlum conversion oropo.sal-approved last year uy the Pic-6y'converting each accommo-dation unit within'thb vail hini"ii.'diuu Hot"t into condominiums. He discussed4 conditions of approvar which jniira.il- i.--rinliizi;g-il recording the emproyee
PEc -4- ilrro
Piper stated that he was open to consideration of revisions. He reminded theboard that they had made changes to cascade virug"-thii-;erateJ io.r,;;;";"-in economic conditions. He stated that density controi-coisisted of severalparts. The site plan was.good as was the.chan-ge in the ioiation of the access.He felt that the tondensed-units provea tnemieTves'*"ii oi-ilr" site, but wasmore concerned (as was Rapson) with ttre massing oi ine q-sraller units.
Bossow repeated his.concerns, arld_piper responded that there was knowledge9I lt,tt.property and its potential uie when'potato piicr,"nis platted. Jamarstated that..they had contacted several residents ana-niJ receivej iivo"ioie'response. Mike Lauterbach said that he-knew of at leait tO units at the potatoPatch CIub that were for sa]e for $4OO,OOO-ina'rp, ini-ihii it woutA be beneficialto have smaller units at 770.
Jay Peterson stated that he had handled the original zon.ing, that the numberof units was not a magic number. He added thit potato pilcrr rria-.i*uvl-t".nenvisioned as for multi-family units as welt.ai ior prii."i/s..onaarv ii,nins."Peterson said that originally-they_had stgtgq tnai ttrey woiio oo 30 units, butthe Town did not say that thby coirlo not bui'ld i6 dii;."-ile added today's marketwas geared toward sma'l ler units.
Patten stated that the board needed to focus on the issues. This situation isnot unlike others. Many other rnulti_famiiv-riI.i'ir.:;;iliy finished, with othersnot yet started' Patten said that increasing density iur i'policy of major importance.He asked what was unique about ihis siiuation, inO iiaea-tilat if the pEC and Tbwncouncil fee'l that chariges shourd ue maje in ttre ivpe-;;-";;;ng system we cu*en6yhave, the staff woutd iire some aiieliiJn- -To gr;;a,o..-rnit., one shoutd.tookat traffic, utit ities, what tlle area-ian 'f,ota-ti'UJji'ri-*ithl
and then develop criteriafor attowing more uniis, simifir-lJ-tii"proposed vair viilage-Siuiy]" -""='"" '-'
Jamar stated that if everyone agreed that this was a betteip.lan, ihe board fraathe ability to amend the -ordinaice.
Piper asked if the developer could use the revised site plan without the 6 extraunits, and Jamar said thai it was decided that this numblr would make a successfulproject. Donovan asked why the vait viilage-inn'piojEli-*u. ,o different thatevervthins had been changed. she_added urit in "iailiv wiien tt,. propoied iil;"II was built, it would aipear smitter-inan [rre originii ii"Jposar
Patten stated that this decision would apply to other sites, and if approved someoneelse wourd come in with a request t; inaita;e their density.
Pierce stated that he wanted the project to be successful, and that the pEC shouldlook at each project on its own mirili. -
n commend theadditional 6 unitJ n the fact that t re was a tter site ss GRFA,
)-.f-r.
-I'C;
ORDINANCE NO. 30Series of 1977-
AN ORDINANCE AI4ENDING TTTLE 18 OF THE VAIL
MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE ALLOWABLERESIDENTIAL UNITS IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
WITHIN ?HE TOWN I{HICH ALLOII FOR RESIDENTIALUSE; CREATING A NEW ZONING DISTPIICT TO BE
KNO}TI\ AS TVIO FAMITY PRIMARY,/SECONDARY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; CREATING A NEWDEFINITION FOR''ACCOM}IODATION UNITS" ;
REZONING CERTAIN SPECIFTED PARCELS OF
PROPERTY; SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION
TO ALL OF THE FOREGOING; AND, A}4ENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
WITH THE WITHIN ADOPTED AIVIENDMENTS
WHEREAS, the To','/n Council initiated certain changes
to the Zoning Code of the Tov/n of Vail to provide for new and
reduced residential densities;
WHEREAS, the Town Council is of the opinion that the
Zoning Code as presently constituted was in error in that it
allowed for residential densities and population numbers that
would potentially tax the public facilities of the Town of Vail,
the recreational facilities of the ski area, and would generally
degrade the environment;
WHEREAS, because of the growth of the Gore Valley,
demand of the residents and visitors t'o the Gore Valley, and the
overall changes in the community, the Zoning Ordinance should be
amended to reduce the gllowable residential units within the
Town and amended as to specific parcels of property to bring
those parcels of property into conformity with the neighborhoods
in which they are located and the Town's comprehensive pJ-anning;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held public hear-
ings concerning the proposed changes to the Zoning Code, considered
the same, and recommended approval of said changes to the Town
Council; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is in the
interest of the public health, safety and welfare, to amend the
Zoning Code of the Town of Vail to reduce all_owable residential
densities;
(.l
x7
(
Ord. 30
(r (,1 ,.
Page 2
>
Section 2. Title 18 ZONING of the Vail Municipal Code
is amended by the addition of a chapter lg.l3 entitled TI{o FA!{rLy
PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESTDENTIAL DISTRICT to read as follows:
Now, THEREFORE, BE rr ORDATNED BY THE TOI{N couucrl oF
THE TOI{N OF VAIL, COT,ORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Section 18.04.03O ACCOMMODATION UNIT Of
the vail Municipal code is amended by the addition of the fol-
lowing sentence:
Each acconunodation unit shall be counted as onehalf of a dwelling unit for purposes of calcula-ting allowable units per acre.
Section 18.13.0I0. purpose.
The Two-family Primary/Secondary Residential Districtis intended to.provide sites for single family; ortwo-family residential uses in which one unit is alarger primary residence and the second unit is a :smaller I'caretaker apartment', together with suchpublic facilities as may appropriately be locatedin the same district. The fwo-fanily-primary/Secondary Residential District is intended to ensureadeguate light, air, privacy, and open space for eachdwelling conunensurate with single family and twofanily occupancy, and to maintain the desirable resi-dential gualities of such sites by establishing appro-priate site d,evelopment standards.
Section 18.13.020. permitted Uses.
The foll-orving uses shall be permitted:
1. Single fanily residential dwellings2. Two-family residential dwellings
Section 18.13.030. Conditional Uses.
The following conditional uses shall be permitted,subject to issuance of a Conditional Use permit inaccord with provisions of Chapter 18.60 of this Title:
1. Public utility and public service uses.2. Public buildings, grounds and facilities.3. Public or private schools.4. Public park and recreation facilities.5. Ski lifts and tows.
The following accessory uses shalJ- be permitted:
1. Private greenhouses, toolsheds, playhouses,garages or carports, swimming pools, patios,and recreation facilities customarilyincidental to single family and two familyresidential uses.
2. Home occupations, subject to issuance ofa home occupation permit in accord with theprovisions of Chapter 18.58 of this Title.
Section 18.13.040.
rr '\-t' " ord. 30
C
3. other uses customarily incidental and
accessory to permitted or conditional
usesr and necessary for the operationthereof.
Section 18.13.050. Lot Area and Site Dimensions.
The minimum lot or site area shal1 be 15,000 squarefeet, and each site shal1 have a mi-nimum frontageof 30 feet. Each site shal1 be of a size and shape
capabJ-e of enclosing a square area, 80 feet on eachside, within its boundaries.
Section 18.13.060. Setbacks.
The minimum front setback shall be 20 feet' the
minimum side setback shall be l0 feet, and the min-
imum rear setback shal-l- be 20 feet, or I0 feet if
one side setback is at least 20 feet; provided that
one foot of additional side and rear setback shall
be required for each two feet of building height over
15 feet.
Section 18.13.070. Distances Between Buildings.
The minimum distance between a dwelling on a site
and a dwelling on an adjoining site shall be 20 feet;provided that one foot of additional separation
between dwellings shal1 be required for each twofeet of building height over 15 feet, calculated onthe basis of the average height of the proposedbuilding.
Section 18.13.080. Density Control.
Not more than two dwelling units in a single structureshall be permitted on each site in conformance with
the provisions of this section. A total of not more
than 25 square feet of gross residential floor area
(GRFA) shall be permitted for each 100 square feet for
the firsL 15,000 square feet of site arear plus not
more than J-0 square feet of gross residential floor
area shall be permitted for each 100 square feet of
site area over 151000 square feet not to exceed 301000
square feet 9f site area, plus not more than five squarefeet of gross residential floor area for each 100 squarefeet of site area in excess of 30,000 square feet.
On any site containing two dwelling units' one of theunits shal1 not exceed one-third (I/3) ot. the allowabletotal gross residentail fLoor area (GRFA).
Section 18.13. 090. €!t" Co*r.ge_'-
Not more than 20 per cent of the total site area shaLl be
covered by buildings.
Section 18.13.100. Useable open Space.
A minimum of 500 square feet of useable open space ex-
clusive of required front setback areas shall be provided
at ground 1evel for a single farnily dweI1ing. A minimum
of 350 square feet of useable open space exclusive of
required front setback area shall be provided at ground
l-evel for each dwelling unit of a two family dwelling. the
minimum dinnension of any area quali-fying as useable open
space shaIl be l-0 feet.
C
Page
I
ord.30 C
4Page
Section 18.13.1I0. Landscaping and Site Development.
At least 60 per cent of each site shall be landscaped.
The minimum of any area qualifying as landscaping shall bel0 feet (width and length) with a minimum area not lessthan 300 square feet.
Section 18.13.120. Parkin<r.
Off-street parking shall be provided in accord with ArticleL4 of this ordina.nce.'
Section 3. Section 18.12.050 LOT AREA AND SITE DIMEN-
SIONS is amended by the increasing of the site area from 15,000
square feet to 17,500 square feet.
Section 4. Section 18.16.0I0 PURPOSE of the Vail
Municipal Code is amended by the changing of the allowable dwel-
ling units from 12 dwelling units per acre to 9 dwelling units
per acre.
Section 5. Section I8.18.010 PURPOSE of the Vail
Municipal Code is amended by changing the alLowabl-e dwelling
units from "I5 to 30 dwelling units per acrerr to a maximum of
18 dwelling units per acre.
Section 6. Section 18.20.0I0 PURPOSE of the Vail
Municipal Code is amended to provide that the allowable densities
will be changed from "densities ranging from 25 to 50 dwelling
units per acre" to a maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre.
Section 7. Section L8.22.010 PURPOSE of the Vail
Municipal Code is "^.rri.a by the addition of a sentence to read
as follows:
The public acconrmodation district is intended toprovide sites for todging units at densities not \to exceed 25 dwelling units per acre.
Section 8. Section 18.26.010 PURPOSE is amended by
the addition of a sentence to read as follows:
The commercial core district is intended to includesites for residential dwellings at densities not to
exceed 25 dwelling units per acre.
Section 9. Section 18.28.I00 DENSITY of the vail
Municipal Code is arnended by the addition of a sentence to read
as follows:
The maximum allowable residential density within the
commercial service center shaLl- be 18 dwell-ing units
Per acre.
od. 30
\C
ant
o
Section 10. Pursu to Section
oPase5 c
18.65.160 of the VaiL
Municipal Code, those parcels described on Exhibj_t A of this
ordinance (which by this reference becomes a part hereof) are
rezoned from the existing zones as shown on the Exhibit A to the
new zone as shown on Exhibit A.
Section 11. The Town Council specificallv finds that
the procedures for the amendment of the Official Zoning Map, the
amendment of Title 18 relating to zoning, and the rezoning of
certain properties within the Town of Vail as prescribed in
Chapter 18.66 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and
the Council hereby receives the report and recommendation of the
Planning Comrnission recommending the within described amendments
to the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Vai1, amendments to
Title l8 of the Vail Municipal Code, and rezonings of certain
specified properties.
Section 12. As provided in Section 18.08.030 of the
vail Municipal code, the Zoning Administrator is hereby directed
to promptly modify and amend the officiar Zoning Map to indicate
the amendments herein contained..
Section 13. If any part, section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be
invarid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remain-
ing portions of this ordinance, and the Town council hereby d.eclares
it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, sub-
section, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, regardless of the fact
that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses
or phrases be declared invalid.
section 14. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of
any provision of the vail Municipal code sha11 apply only to that,
provision specifically repealed and shall not be construed to
apply to any other provision. The repear or the repeal and reen-
actment of any provision of the vail Municipal code as provided
in this ordi-nance shalr not affect any right which is accrued,
any duty imposed, &Dy violation that occurred prior to the effect-
ive date hereof, dny prosecution conmenced, nor any other action
or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision
repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision
hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previousry
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
of. ,o Op.s. e t2
Section 15.The Council hereby states that this ordi-
nance is neceEsary for the -protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
TNTRODUCED, REIAD ON FIRST READING, AppRO\rED AIID ORDERED
PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this Ist day of November, L977. and a
pulclic hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular
meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail , Colorado, on
the 15th day
Building of
of November, L977, at 7;30 P.M. in the Municipal
the Town of Vail .
5-D-\t'h*\\
ORDINANCE 24
Series of .|984
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE #30 OF 1977;
CHANGING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DI,'ELLING UNITS
ON LOT 6, BLOCK 2, POTATO PATCH, FROM A I
MAXIMUM OF 30 UNITS PLUS ONE EMPLOYEE UNIT
TO A MAXIMUM OF 36 UNITS PLUS ONE EMPLOYEE ,
HOUSING UNIT.g5'+(
WHEREAS, 0rdinance #30
maximum of 30 dwelling
of 1977 zoned
units plus one
WHEREAS, the densty
site planning; and
increase is justified due to improvements
ND\
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmenta'l Commission has
of this amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Town
the health, safety
NOl,l, THEREFORE, BE
COLORADO, THAT:
U
recommended approvit &0(}ntcl
Council is of the opinion that this amendmentwill protect
and welfare of the inhabitants of the Town of VaiI;
IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
Section '1.
Exhibit A of 0rdinance #30, Series of 1977, fifth paragraph from the top, is
hereby amended to read as follows:
-Lot 6, B]ock 2, Potato Patch shall -be zoned Medium Density Multi-Family
( frorr, with a maximum of 36 units lMone unit *"hich shalt be\
f restricted tXnemRlovee trousins.ht+ )
.1
.,
Section 2.
If any part, section, subsection, sentencB, Clouse or phrase of this ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it
would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, c'tauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 3.
The Town Council hereby
necessary and proper for
the inhabitants thereof.
Section 4.
The repeal or the repea'l and reenactment of any provisions of the Vai] Municipal
Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued,
any duty imposed, any vio:latlion that occurred prior to the effective date hereof,
any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as cqnmenced under
or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of
any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING
1984, and a public hearing shal1 be held on
THIS day of
this ordinance on the
of , 1984 at 7:30 p.m. In the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Bui'lding, Vail, Colorado.
fu] 'l thi s ,1984.
Rodney E. Slifer, Mayor'
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
finds, determines and declares that thil ordinance is
the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vai.l and
dav
Cay of
Vail
0rdered pub'l i shed i n
''-;l "
ATTEST:
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND
thi s
ATTEST:Rodney E. Slifer, Mayor
READING AND ORDERED
^i
PUBLISHED
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town C'lerk
day , 1984.
r
tr
L
ffi,sl;)E^
A!
SIGNEO
RECIPIENI KEEP THIS COPY, RETURN WHITE COPY TO SENOER
iDtt'61\nL
I
0P1c1frn) _ ttmmO
3LNfln
TLX
I tol
3{a. lq3S
&paa
+-D) 15,.lo
xt{v7
v+)6leqL
BLq
6,?trty
f?{.2
?YBrz-
.l_
|-:- .1
-'
t ta *,T\ q-tf I
v-,
ao?o
L, Ino drfiis^!"a
!V, orV
)
t7aBtas6^/Q
9 l4r2?
3t *2O
22,5 ,r z1
t1 < tz.5
Jo ,<?-a -
LrZd
5*tl
17 xtL
3,SrlL
Ytg
Cza
tf0
Z.l7tf
I aeo
,(e
1'
lqz
uz
7z xt76,
'{o,5 x/4,f
l q,5 xzo
1Y!?
7z -zo
(vtLg
30 xA
23fl, , ec-sl-
+ St u.nlls
'l?-1
QL1,L1
L1o
b0
tl'( o
5l
tllo(
r- 5-7 -
gp r21
l" rS
Lz < 8,9
3z<lh
| 5 rl<,7
l?-rc(
LqL.,
\u
20 r?-?
tao rlb'9
14*lL
X,1 tc l7 6
79 rll,5
lO r.l
fa *71 6
'7 v17,5
'tz. ( tlrtl,s\
L(40
('U0
flrq
rqt.'l5
?010
tt0
585
130 ,9
t15,5
Lqq7,?5+32
g-s
20v2l'5
t3pl2
Z5'5rlZ
3' J v 3,5
/? rZ3 6
7A vQ
l3 rtz
11x4,1-
23,, r lZ-
I yq{
2?y2'4,5
lz rto
TotJ 2a2O
r{ 1o
fib
306
lL,?5
L<tz
,lOO
t7u
331,5
L42
q(l
57"
lL0
Lll0
11tL7,
+71
M,//'{ 4"2{d ffiZ
/
'
fufos*D ffi JZesT ,ft,
?o% 3{t ,{ 70 *2 fit(./vto ""/ I V- -f f--7
/
2t(fto,t,ilc€- 6/7o ^,/*r/z> ItgY ,*'/"i"u
/
to
3tt5 G
\,r3
zul
lz
- Lz(er -r)
t, 5 vlV,5
3f,5 r2o
3t,5 r2o
/72
' -' ,
38,25
-l lo
1lo
lb7
5bt
3t
v(
lLvt4
73,J x2t
/o,7 rz
lrf I
ZLt37,Zj r 0rt I "< ,0 .tYFYSl4|k .,nE t. -. ttlctttlz I z B{?,5 +/zqZl,\ ,tt:.-,( z :{.tob / qqbS \Y/l?-tt 3 2"976 | ?,otzq,4 \}f}h -Y 2\45 ' 71 t zq15' 7 5
" t ilt?,t' \ 3531 ,-?5 --
I
"pl
t (r- Ullq ,25 \ 2 1tut6, /'
t
@
ffift
ilrd*rr,"30 .t0, F+
l+o,?sy
I,wj
t6t,l]).3t
w'
fupor&d
ea,rs? nf,
!Ll
20
J€.?.3i'fl
nti'w
euf
I
!
/
II
I
l
I
I
I
I
Iv
le
\r?o
?a,il+
%w
fi,n'l
+riil3
haa-l[ 4n
0rtgl&
av,J.ta n{.
TI
tll
/ Jf,t'r, ,\ yV, wlVfr /
,p l" 3,Fo1vr*
a 0 n*p'
f
nrnF
A,l,ltr"
i'tilt
i&-hpwt(s 0
fi\!$ !*#
Pt^Irj r
{.lLtlTI. I'tr
trqpt^f
l"
t ,l
-/
ilN
[k,s
il\T
im,s
.is)
i,Fa f
'l^ r,rit.
'fiJ.SU+rH
iLle6.l2l.t
i:,'(f
I Fkrf'h-
tu4.
3D,f
l"ftk
f ,fz
. *tttffi
3)-t
JJ, )_ld'f '
IT,
/<--r*ffi
)0,{J}at
JJ. Ttls lt
\,S(
\*1
I
)'.r
I
)th,\w-.=/.6y eL"ffiH'
---=.- -rt's
a o
\s r\Wf.
,njil..\'
Wo€ir",*t '? i t*-ti{: tq') 6n,DX
u'',\ f L 3..tUn{ 5 L 3.t
U^,h t,)-iy\ r{
\)-,k , \j, i'\ i tl )1, 16
.\Vry
',,' ffi 0ciqi*0-tlo,r"-lY!-A 0
|l
rl
\r
I
thdt4 lwtL
to/ ,1rt
t.
td .0AAL: fan+9
ba.Lr pn!
Acat I ,,' Jf
a t ^la{ ao//'*il-?
!ln**{, fr
fulal
Tf
)LtLt^n L
il,nIlffi
#ffi tr
^oL*'!*Jwr*
W:w W{
J?, n'/
JJ, s7
tv,,7r/
W
3a,W
&Y, aa
5?, Yto
1*t _.h" *^ blfu o' I.iJdo^ hhJ Fr. ,,-?fiS., g^,*r'n/*}}lh
1Ws,
%rr,^ ft..
(t
,l", I
i d!r*+ fu u/. t nct'nr irtufilltl wit| ran, nailhl
W,i i*I^},
14 law l\DrrtF
0ar ffin*' M7nP ;
o A (D lD,n,fuf aa_a
'.Dftiy tf pc / fl**^,
l",o*1 rl'sfu,,;fo t
whhd
(tunn,. v&l h c*r"p{ftwa
,hn"rb, -{ {)r{ 'frftl
,Ec tttlttr fk w-f , Jnlna*r.{au, nDn F'' hle! 3u *,,fu :!-'--'3 ht"{ t,r,-h I\'tW*hptd,*d'*
oYh*furcY
/fC nur"r,^r/Ai'^ i "*tYf **fdrv*P
9 J; puruv!
DpnF'i,,l-- t
t l^ ,.w",H!t:
PP Wfffi,F^t:#t6ef7l Et ,*b
^/A*k ,trt, rff*u,ni"
:!^qf;"ffi^pc
U
5iler *,'3 0d b'T
"t IF, BtuL), U U.
lbunrtl ) tDtY\F
6$
; Y5,1Sg 0 l,tq[ s*t
b,t3rl , $lo&-l ,
hDlnF 8 t,n*l'
?'t"}'
0 tnrt t$dl WfqE ?v.o
bwh )S,DOD {
tt{-lt\rtq.' Lt,q},, JH,;
,q{} efttt
tll,Lld1O
rn Ua^I.tfil B\L?, 6\c\o ?"{,trn-*' .',) - '- - -tttD tnrt rv\d/ |
t,te-Artq" q,q),, ?-l,{,NS +
[br lho"uio
1pog',S .]OlLrnik fr,W"*St*q
P"tct..
-!-'-L
.$h
o
hcd'fr'
rlrc^t 1
t+,1 u4rli ellngd
8u',{5 & Jt'&C
oili l, 0l a{,M5 s{,,{3t ik,, n$orgd. 1 \t *rr\
?-tf*.\ti b t r^,{l /J *"rl \o€"fodn h,t
a\hlgi B,3H (,Rrq
[qti.U{ (q}so C,tFA
ftnsipr tl'UV0fylf
ffi uil
+1,q1{ rrrviMt' ,6eF+
It- ut" hfo ou &1dq r4oor F
(T,IEI\,IORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environrnental Corunission
FR0M: Department of Corununity Development/peter patten
DATE: October 8, 1981
SUBJECT: Proposed amendment to ordinance No. 30, series of L97l as it relatesto Lot 6, Block 2, YaiI Potato Patch Filing No. I to allow j0 rmitsplus an employee restricted caretaker unit. Applicant: Vail Invest-nent and Devel opment o Ltd.
BACKGROUND
Ordinance No. 50 of 1977 was the down
Growth Management Study. One of thein Potato Patch--Lot 6, Block 2. Theto a maxirnum of 30 units with Mediunnent standards (including GRFA).
zoning ordinance resulting fron the
down zonings was a nulti-family parcel
PEC and Council voted to zone this parcel
Density Multi-Fanily Zone District develop-
(
REQUE9I
The request is to amend that ordinance to allow another unit which would beused to house a caretaker/ security person near the entrance to the project.The applicant has stated that he would agree to the applicable restiiciionsof Ordinance 22, series of l98l to the unit (xestrictions for the secondary -dwelli.ng unit for lots under 15,000 sq ft). Also, he has agreed that no a-dditional
GRFA will be requested (other than that allowed for the origi-nal 30 units)for thi.s caretaker unit .
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Comnunity Development recorunends approval of this ordinanceanendment. we feel that not only does thi.s type of unit serve a valuablepurPose for the future residents of the project, but it allows the projectto provi-de housing for the enployee(s) it is generating.
'I
Con-dition: of Approval
That the restrictions contained i.n Section
18.13,080 (B) 3, S, 6, and 10 be applied andexecuted as it relates to the caretaker unit.
That the total allowable GRFA for the original
30 units not be exceeded on the property.
L
2.
PEO6- ro/12/81
6, Request.for sn..arnendnent .to.,the {own..'of'. l,bil Zoning 0rdinance No. 30
(, '\ Applicant: Vail lnvestment and Development, Ltd.
Peter Patten explained and listed the restrictions in the nemo. Craig Snowdon,
architect for the applicant, stated that the applicant agreed to the restrictions
and added that these would be luxury uni.ts with a single access onto thePotato Patch Drive, Peter stated that he had received a letter fron John
Hal1 stating that he approved the request. Craig explained the access from
Potato Patch Drive and also the visability. Gery stressed that the total
allowable GRFA wouldntt be exceeded, He was concerned with the growing
need for employee housing. Jin Sheehan stated the plan was to incorporatethe employee unit with the cabana near the pool ,
Roger noved and Will seconded to reconmend to Town Council approval of the
anendrnent with the conditions of approval listed by staff. The vote was 7.0in favor, unan j-mous,
7, Request for exterior alteration and rnodification to the Casino Bui.lding
ts:Carlos Agostoni and Jarnes J, Sprowls.
Rick Baldwin of PierceBaldwin Associates, architects for the project statedthat Dick Ryan reconnended they come before the PEC that day,
Dick Ryan said that the Council had approved the Casino request with changes,
f i and that Mrs, Hill had sent a letter showing no real objection with the extension
\ to the west. Rick added that the bridge was a dead issue at present--
that other external factors had forced this decision.
Dick felt that the PEC nust concentrate on the issue. The discussion whichfollowed concerned liking the proposal .
Dan rnoved and Roger seconded to approve the exterior alteration of the deck area.
The vote was 7.0 unanimously in favor.
The neeting was adjourned at 5:40.
U/7a4rt/fi
t
8/eu,L-gnTLazM hnrs
- AL"ILJ'
na/z-h;- 4/.
'/"2/"*"a
I
,i
\
Z5;.,-, L +A- /2,
U --,.-,-'-. /-*, ,,4f #u.-;/
%,ft#ry
/ -- a-",----t-:7 t-b D
/'///u< ;ft /, aff.d,--,-"-,<s- sA. ta<y'-^ 4/,-"--
^-9i/ J.bil-*/'i-,*- p/a- tffit:c,z tY'a-^.4t4 ils{glt?ta4e'of WLt---b-'U, UbI*-rW,
;) u /'n u
-fA (',Zhrl l**e*/1
^tt,"d^,[
0,d ]u a,t
/t;U /t"r,""""|
\
il,r*a hr^ M' qA,-Jftu0 0 c M
t_
lb
(1)
7:30 pm
(2)
8:3O pm
(3)
9:00 pm
(4)
9:05 pm
(5)
9:20 pm
hrbt^
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
EVENING SESSION
Tuesday, August 2!, \9847:30 p.m.
AGENDA
A REQUEST TO AMEND ORDTNANCE 30, SERTES OF Lg77, TO TNCREASE THE NUTTBEROT' UNITS ALLOWED TO BE CONSTRUC'iED AT 770 POTATO PATCH FROI\I 30 UNirSPLUS ONE EMPLOYEE UNIT TO 36 PIUS ONE EMPLOYEE UNIT.
g.IPII4NCE #14, SERIES OF 1984, SECOND READING AN ORDINANCE BEPEALINGAND NEENACTING CHAPTER 5.24 O'fr tUN UUTTCiPAL COON OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,PROVIDING FOB POLICY AND FIRE ALARI',I MONITORING, PROVIDING A FEE SCHEDULEAND SETTING FORTH REGULATIONS RELATING TO FALSE ALARMS, LICENSING OFFrRE AND sEcuRrrY ALARM corupANrEs, AND pRovrDrNG ron puNaiiiis-rirnuro.
gR?-II4Iqry #22, SERIES OF 1984, SECOND READING, AN ORDINANCE CORRECTINGA CLERTCAL ERRoR rN oBDTNANCE #20, sERrEs oF i984.
9BPIryANCE #23,.SERIES OF 1984, FIRST READING, AN ORDINANCE AMENDINGCHAPTER 3.48.130, PARAGRAPH C, Ol'THE IVIIINICIPAL CODE OF THE TOI{N OF VAIL'TO PROVIDE FOR CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT LAND TRANST'ER TAXES TO THETOITN TREASURER AND I'OR THE:EXTENSION OF SUCH DELINQUENCIES UPoN THE REALPROPERTY TAx RoLLs oF THE couNTy AND THE cor,r-,pcrrorri or suctt oulmqunxrIEES IN THE SAME MANNER AS DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES LEVIED upoN sticllPROPERTY.
9Ilrry4NCE #25, SERTES OF 1984, tr'rRST READTNG, AN ORDTNANCE AUTHORTZTNGTHE TSSUANCE OF TOI{N OF VArL, coLoRADO, I,ronsgrgo TMPRoVEMENT DrSTRrcrSPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS, DAiED OCTOENN 1, Lg84, IN THE AGGREGATEPIiINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $955,000, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OFCONSTRUCTING AND INSTALLING iMPROVEMENTS TO THE LIONSHEAD MALL ANDSURROUNDING AREAS: PRESCRIBING TIIE FORTI OF THE BONDS, PROVIDING FOR TIIEPAYMENT OF TIIE BONDS AND THE INTEREST THEREON: AND MAKING PROVISION FoROTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
IISgrtgT_rOry #16, SERTES OF 1984, A RESOLUTTON REQUESTTNG THAT THE PRESTDENToF TIIE UNTTED STATES, UNDER THE PROVTSTONS OI SE-CTTON 301(b), pIlBLrC LAW93-288, As rlvlPLErtENTED By 44 cFR 2ob, 41, DECLARE EAGIa couNTy AND THECOMMUNITIES LOCATED THEREIN A MAJOR DISASTEB AREA.
REQUEST BY VAIL ASSOCIATES', TWC. FOR TOWN PARTICIPATION IN ITEATHEBMODIFICATION PROGRAM FOR VAIL MOUNTIN.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Roger Tilkemeier -.
CONSIDERATION OF EASEMENT REQUEST FROM VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. FORWESTIN HO TRAIL.
PRESENT,ATION ON BOOTH FALLS ROCKFALL STUDY.
APPOINTMENT OF PEC MEilIBER.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT
TOWN ATTORNEY REPONT
ADJOURN[,IENT ,1/n.r' _ {ful.:--_.....-CharlesffiAssistant Town Manager
(6)
9:50. pm
(7)
O:0O pm
O:15 pm
(8)
.0:45 pm
(e)
.1:0O pm
( 10)1:30 ptn
( 11)
(L2)
( 13)
1:35 pm
'l
T0: Town Council
FROM: Corununity Development Department
DATE: August 17, 1984
SUBJECT: A request to amend Ordinance 30, Series of 1977, to increase the
number of units allowed to be constructed at 770 Potato Patch Drive- from 30 units plus one employee unit to 36 units plus one employeeunit. Applicant: Ed A. Smith
0n August .|3, 1984, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved theapplicant's request to amend Ordinance 30 to allow 36 plus one employee unit.
Diana Donovan made the motion to approve the additional 6 units based uponthe fact that there was a better site p1an, less GRFA, less site coverage,earth covered parking, no variances were requested, and the change in sizeof each unit was in response to national economic changes. Donovan also re-quested that a legal document be filed so that buyers of the Phase II units
would understand that any requests for additjonal GRFA would be denied. Themotion was seconded by Gordon Pierce. Larry Eskw'ith added that the document
mentioned by Donovan could be filed, but that rights of individuals to comein and request additional GRFA could not be taken awa.y. The result of the votewas 4 in favor with I (Duane Piper) against. Piper firlt that the same improvementscould have been achieved without increasing the number of units.
P'l ease see the enclosed PEC mjnutes, staff memo, s'ite p'lan, 0rdinance 30,and the proposed Ordinance 24 for more information on the proposd'l .
b.
a
A regular meetingAugust 2t, 1-984 at,
Town Council was held on Tuesday,in the Council Chambers.
Roclney E, Slifer, MayorPaul Johnston, Mayor Pro-Tem
Chuck AndersonKent RoseColleen Kline
Hermann Staufer
Gail lVahrl ich-Lorventhal
I,IINUTES
VAIL TOIVN COUNCIL IUEETING
TUESDAY, AUGUST 2L, L9847:30 P.trI.
}IEIilBERS
of the Va1l
7 :30 p. m.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:BiIl Pyka, Assistant Town lt4anagerLarry Eskwith, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
The flrst item on the agenda was a request to amend Ordinance 30,Series of 1977, to increase the number of units allowed to be con-structed at 77O potato Patcb from 30 units plus one employee unit to36 units plus one employee unit. Kristen Pritz made a presentation,explaining the request. It was originally zoned allowing 117 units.In L977 the property was reviewed and the number of units designatedat 30. She explained the approved and proposed site p1ans. The GRFAfor revised proposal is belorv the approved proposal . The new proposalhas two additional surface parking areas and a partially covered area,as opposed to fu11y covered parking in the original p1an. The approvalof the proposal is rea11y a policy lssue in as far as density increasesare concerned. The Staff posltion is that deci.sions should reflectTown Council policy. The Council could ask for certain trade-offs toj.ncrease the number of units or look at things on a case-to-case basis.The staff feels that the proposal should not be approved. Kristenthen reviewed the PEC meeting where it was approved 4-1 on the improvedsite p1an. Peter Jamar of Berridge & Assoc, landscape architects,rvas there representing the owner. Also present representing theowner were Buff Arnold and Mike Lauterbach). Peter shorved and explainedthe mode1, sholving what is currentLy bu1lt and what 1s proposed. Heexplained that the reason they are present is that they are trying tofind a solution to the problem that the project is half completed,wlrich does not malie sense, either economically or physically. In !g7'l ,it was zoned for 117 units, which is not reasonable. A number of 30was arrj.ved at. The [lDlrlF zoned the number of dwelling units thatcould be buj-It to 66, and we are not asking for rezoning or upzoning.Peter mentioned sonre of the things that were sald in L977 regardingthe rezoning. At that time it was said to be an ongoing process.This request',vould increase the number of people i.n the Town by four.Peter then reviewed the site pIan. The site coverage of the buildingshas been reduced, opening up substantial area of usable amenities space.The view from the valley will be the same because of peripheral land-scaping. The area along Potato Patch Dri.ve will also be landscaped.The approved GRFA will be reduced by approximately 1,700 sf. The newaccess is endorsed by Public lYorks and the FireDepartment. The parking
solutj"on of having some spaces ln an earth-covered structure, has beensuccessfully used before. The possible negative impacts are how sixadditional units will require t2 parking spaces. That has been solved.The other one is the two addltional bedrooms which means 4 more people.Peter felt that the positive benefits of the plan far outrveigh thenegative. Buff Arnold, the architect on the project, reviewed theproject. He was hired by the developer to develop the second phaservith units tha.t would be salable and marketable. Rodney Slifer saidthat we had received several letters, both opposing and in favor ofthe project.Colleen questioned whether the total number of units was36 units plus employee unit. Peter Patten said that the total numberis 37. The zoning, when the property rvas purchased, was 30 plus one.
g la,/lu /
Paul Johnston wanted to know how many similar situations Peter knew
of where upzoning or rezoning similar to this might be requested.
Peter handed out a list of projects, with the number of units.
Rodney Slifer then opened the subiect to public discussion.
George Boyer, owner of lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Potato Patch, was
the first speaker. He said that the proposal for Phase II has some
attractive aspects; the property wiIl be improved, less square
footage, only 2 additional units, etc. He did not believe that
the smaller units would be easier to sel1 because of the current
inventory. If the project is allowed to go ahead, there must be
Sone assurances that pioiect will be completed. Diane Donovan said
that the project was good for the neighborhood and the criteria in
the motion do not make it precedent-setting
Paul Johnston made a motion to*ilcny-lQrrlliLa'qce 24' which was seconded
by Colleen Kline. A vote rvas'taken and the motion passed 5-0, with
Chuck Anderson abstaining. .
The next item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance
No. 14, Serles of 1984, the Alarm Ordinance. Ken Hughey explalned
that the Police and Fire Departments encourage adoption of this
ordinance. At work sessi.on, some changes were recommended, wbieh
have now been made. Dave Bittner of SCI thinks the Town should get
out of the alarm monitoring business and would like comments from
the Town Council. Kent Rose said that SCI is doing a better iob than
anyone has ever done before, but most people still want the Town to
stay in the business. Dave Bittner then mentioned that the numbers
put together by the Town don't look right. Rodney sald that if the
numbers are not right, we will be back here soon. Mike Cacioppo
wanted to know if the Town had received a lot of complaints about
local monitorlng companies. Dick Duran said that he had received
a few complaints but the Police Department does not necessarily
investigate the validity of the complaints. Illike Cacioppo then said
that he had received tremendous service from local company and that
the government should not get competitlve lvith private enterprise.
Paul Johnston moved to adopt ordinance No. 14, Series of 1984 on
Second reading, which was seconded by Kent Rose. A vote was taken
and the motion passed unanimously and the ordinance was ordered published
in ful1 on second reading.
The next item on the agenda was the presentation of the Booth Fa11s
rockfall study. Mr. Nlcholas Lampiris of Schmueser & Co. made a
presentation regarding the mitigation of rockfal1. Hj.s recommendation
is a trench. ttre cosi wi}l be approximately $3,000-$5,000 the first
two or three years, and $1,ooo-$3,000 after that. He is very confident
tbat this sytem will work when it is in palce. It lvil] cost about
$845,000 to construct the entire trench and a financial solution
is to be workecl out with the owners. George Hallenbeck would like
to slt down wlth council to discuss all possibilities of how to do
this project. chuck Anderson wanted to know if it is possible to
get fbO%-insurance coverage with this mitigation. Mr. Lamplris said
it was. Rodney slifer said that the council will try to come up
with possible alternatives to financing. A special improvement.
district might be the way to go. The proposed berm will be 120'
from top to top.
The gext item on the agenda was second reading of Ordinance No. 22,
Series of 1984, correcting a clerical error in Ordinance #2O. There
was no discussion and llermann Staufer moved to approve Ordinance No '
22 on second reading, which lvas seconded by PauI Johnston. A vote
was taken anci the motion passed unanimously and the ordinance was
orclered publishecl by title only on second reading.
The next item was the first reading of Ordinance No. 23, Series of
1984. Larry Eskwith explained that the purpose of the ordinance is
to relieve the Town of the obligation to sue in case of non-payment
of real estate transfer taxes. These taxes would be certlfied tothe County Trasurer and be collected in the same manner as delinquentgeneral taxes on property. Paul Johnston moved to approve Ordinance
No. 23, Series of 1984, on first reading, which was secollded by
llermann Staufer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously
and the ordinance was ordered published in fuIl on first readlng,
The second reacling of the ordi-nance will be held on Tuesday,
September 4, 1984.
The next item was Resolution #16, which asks for designation of
Eagle County and the towns therein as a major disaster area. Larry
Eskwith explained that the reason for the ordinance is that the
Federal government failed to deslare the county a disaster area'
This resolution will strow that we do have serious damage and serious
problems.and might make us eligible for federal disaster aid.
For private residences, there is SBA aid available. Chuck Anderson
moved to approve Resolution #16, which was seconded by Hermann
Staufer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously'
The next item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance #25,
the Lionshead Mall bond issue. Paul Johnston moved that this
ordinance be tabled, which was seconded by Chuck Anderson. A vote
was taken and the motion passed unanimously.
The next item on the agenda was a request by Vail Associates, Inc.
for town participation in weather modification program for Vail
Mountain. Joe lrlicy of Vail Associates made a presentation regarding
the weather modification program. The cost will be $25,586, of
which the Town is requested to pay one-half. The Town and vail
Assocj.ates have been working together on this program since L976/77.
This year, if we stop the work, we get a 4Q7o reduction. '$/e are
looking for a 157o increase in snowfa11. The program is for three
months only, November, December and January. Last year we spent
about $22,000 even though we suspended December 15. Paul Johnston
motioned to participate in the weather modificatlon program'
which was seconded by Colleen Kline. The motion was voted on and
passed unanimously.
The next item was Citizen Participation, where Boger Tilkemeier
once again presented his concerns regarding continuing the sleiglt_
rides in the Town of Vai1. This request goes back to February 1984.
There was some discussion regarding the location of the rides and
the necessary food service ficilities, and Bodney SIifer then told
[1r. Tilkemeier that this should really be handled by the Resreation
Department and fbr him to contact them.
The following item was consideration of an easement request from
Vail Associates, Inc. for the lvestin Ho Trail. Joe Macy made a
presentation regarding the lTestin Ho TraiL They will need an
easement across a piece of Town of vail land a.bove the chevron
station. Andy Norris sald that this has been reviewed a year ago
with Planning and Councll. Kent Rose motioned that the easement
be granted, which was seconded by Hermann Staufer. A vote was taken
and the motion passed unanimously, with the condition that the lega1
description be verified by Bill Andrews.
The next item was the appointment of a PEC member.
and Jere \tlalters v/as elected on second bal1ot.
A vote was taken
The final thing was the report by Bill Pyka, Assistant Town llanager,
on the National Endowment of the Arts money. lfe will have to go
through the process with a new proposal. Rodney Slifer said that
we are stl1l interested in the grant and should get some advise on
how to handle the next proiect better than the last one.
The Town Attorney had no report.
As there was no further business, the meetlng was adjourned at
11 :00 p.m.
ATTEST:
randmeYer
Respectfully submitted,
14INUTESVail Tow
Tuesday,
Page 2
n Council Meetinq0ctobe r 20, 198i
Otn..next-i!qry on the agenda was the second reading of 0rdinance #35,Series of 1981, an ordinance repeal ing and """nucitng certiin iections9f !he Municipal code of the Town of iait ana-frouiding-ttrii'wienuue,a nonconforming use which does not corform witir ttre resuiiiio;i-for thedistrict in which it is located, is.destroyed by tire 6r Jir,""-.a1amity,by act of God,.or by public enemy, the use may Le resumeO or-tne structuremay be restored, prbvided that the restoratioir is commeni"a'in"one year anddif igently pursued-until completion and further providing for the registra-tion of nonconfolming uses with the communiiv-b"iei;p;;;i oipa"irent.Mr. caplan stated that no changes had been mide sincb the fiiit-reaoingof this ordinance. Paul Johnsion made a motion to approve ordinance #35on second reading and Bud Benedict seconded it. All'voted in fivor andthe.motion passed unanimous'l y and the ordinanie was ordered pub'l ished bytitle only.
?
The next item on the agenda was the first reading of 0rdinance #36, seriesof 1981, an ordinance estabr'ishins.and providing"for the;;;t;r;iiion torthe Town council 1nd !l'e Mayor of-the Tbwn of v;il. Mr. capian siit.a tr,utthe-compensation for the council and_the rayor rtio not been'adjuiiea since1973. This ordinance wourd apply only to ii,. nt*-council oeing-voieo inon.November 17, 1981:, It y::' iuggested that the Mayoris corp.isiiion ueraised frgm $350/month to $500/m6ittr and that eicn iouncit *bmuer iicompensation be raised from $150/month to g200/month. Aftei-sore lis.rssionfrom the floor a motion was made'by Bud Benediii ina seConoea-iv-lJnnstonto approve 0rdinance #36 on first ieading. Tom Sieinberg asiea"t6 abstain.A vote was taken the passed unanimously ind trre orainincd wii-orjer"opubl i shed i n ful I on ii rst read i ng .
The next item on the agenda was the first reading of 0rdinance #37, Seriesof 1981, an ordinance, iaopting. q compensaiton program for appJirii,a officialMr. Caplan stated that up'_to Itris time, no iorp"niatton or !iy'tiio *u,given to persons g'i ving bt their time io serue'on tn" various Townboards and commisiions] There was some discussion, craig snowden, amember of the DRB, stated that he would litce io iee it specifically spelledout 'in the ordinance that the compensation would be in a'form of a pass orpri.vilege in l ieu of a do'ilar amount. The councii-agieea ;;; B.iti wittomade a motion to approve 0rdinance #37 on first reading wittr-ttre'addit,ionof the amendment' Bud Benedict seconded it. Alr voted in favor and themotion passed unanimously and was ordered published in full on fiist reaoing
The next item on the agenda was the first reading of 0rdinance #3g, seriesof 1981, an ordinance ibandoning certain rigtri:oi-ways on Columbine Drive.There was some d'iscussion by th6 council. Ii tt'ere was not a map availableto show the council the exait area ueing aulnainea il wai-irss;t[.0 that theitem be tabted untit the November 3,-rgdr;-;;;;i;;. Bi1 wiito made a motioto table ordinance #38 until the novemu."'n"eiing. paul Johnston secondedit. rAl I voted in favor and the motion pusreJ-;;;nimousrv. - - --
Mr. Caplan stated that he did have a request for an abandonment of easementon Lot 1, a resubdivision of Lot 14, Bijnorn Subdivision, ihirJ Raoition,from John Nilsson, owner of the land. it was aetermined that a motionwas a'll that was r99ulred. to approve the Town Manager to sign thisabandonment after it had been i^bviewed by the oeiisn neview-eoird.After some discussion, a motion was made-by Bil.l t,lilto and seionJeoby Paul Johnston to-gpprove the easement piovided that the Town Managernot take action until after the Design Review soira has reviewed thep1ans. All voted in favor and the motion was passed unanimously.
The next item on the agenda was the first reading of 0rdinance #39, seriesof 1981, an ordinance.imending Ordinance #30 o f iglt, changi ng the max.i mumallowable dwerling units on L6t-6: Btoci i,-p6iui6 patch, from a maximum of30 unjts to a maximum or 31 J;;riing uniti; ;;;;iitng injt;;;;r;i, dwellinsunit be restrirt:9.!9 ll.emptoveg.h6using-rnii; i.tting standards govenningsuch emplovee housing units; iiiiing-irrl'p.rriitiure gross residential floorarea for said 31 uniis. peier-pitten, ptinning-rj.pt., exptained the ordinancAfter some discussign, u moiion'io upp"oue 0rdinanie +ss bn firit readingwas made by Ron Todd and secondea oy'bou nra."."-nrr voted in favor andthe motion was rl:::9 unanjmousrv airu the orJinunf. ordered pubi.ished jnful I on fjrst reaorng.
Under Citizen Partic.i patior, Rich Caplan announced that the Town hasreceived a petition from The vailey.bondo A;;;;iiiion to remove the speeodip in that area and that the iounLil ruortu-b;-i;ting tnis under advisempnr
[1.IN{JTESVail Town Council Meeting
Tuesday, November 3, 19817:30 P.Nl.
On Tuesday, i'lovember 3,/.Jeufar meeting in the
I'IEMBERS PRESENT:
1981, the Vail Town CouncilCouncil Chambers in the Vail
Mayor Rodney E. SliferBill Wilto, Mayor Pro-Tem
Bud BenedictPaul Johnston
Ron Todd
Bob Ruder
Dr. Tom Steinberg
convened for itsMunieipal Building.
ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:Richard Caplan, Town il{anager
Lawrence C. Rider, Town Attorney
Colleen Kline, Town Clerk
The first item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinanee #31, Seriesof 1981 , an ordinance providing for an increase 1n th maximum fine which may
be assessed for an ordinance violation from $300.00 to $499.00. Richard
Caplan explal.ned that this ordinance had been presented for second at thelast meeting, but due to a publishing error, it needed to be read on secondjading another time. Mr. Caplan stated there had been no changes to the!dinance since passed on first reading. Bill Wilto made a motion to approve
Ordinance #31 on second reading and Ron Todd seconded it. A11 voted in favor
and the motlon vras passed unanimously and the ordlnance ordered published bytitle on1y.
The next item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance #36, Seriesof 1981 , an ordinance establishing and providing for the compensation for the
Town Council and the Mayor of the Town of Vail. Mr. Caplan stated that there
had been no changes to this ordinance from the first readlng. After somediscussion, Paul Johnston made a motion to approve Ordinance #36 on secondreading and Bud Benedict seconded it, ALl voted in favor and the motionpassed unanimously and the ordinance was ordered published by title on1y.
The next i.tem onthe agenda was the second reading of Ordinance #37, Seriesof 1981 , an ordinance adopting a compensation program for appointed officialsfor the Town of Vail. tr{r. Caplan stated that no changes had been made to thisordinance from flrst reading. Bill lYilto made a motion to approve ordinance#37 on second reading and Ron Todd seconded it. AII voted in favor and themotion passed unanimously and the ordinanqe was ordered published by titleon1y.
Vje next item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance #39, Series of
1981 , an ordinance amending Ordinance #30 of L977, changing the maximum allow-able dwelling units on Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch, from a maximum of 30 unitsto a maximum of 31 dwelling units; provlding that one such dwelling unit berestricted to an employee housing unit; setting standards governing suchemployee housing unit and setti,ng the permissible gross residential floorarea (GRFA) for said 31 units. After some discussion between the Counciland Peter Patten of the Community Development Dept. , a motion was made byBud Benedict and seconded by Paul Johnston to approve Ordinance #39 on secondreading. A11 voted in favor of the motion and it was passed unanimously andthe ordinance was ordered published by title only on second reading.
The next item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance #38, Seriesof 1981. Mr. Caplan explained that this ordinance had been tabled from thelast Council meeting because there was not enough material available toreview the matter completely. After some discussion by the Council itwas decided that the matter should be tabled again until more informationcould be determined as to who owned the properties involved, who had requestedthe abandonment of the easement and the square footage involved. Bill Wilto
made a motion to table Ordinance #38 until the first December meeting. Budlenedict seconded the motion and all voted in favor.v
Or, s/13/84 -z-
Piper asked for an explanation of the final.randscaping, and Richard He.r .rer, theapplicant, stated that on the street side there "ouia 6" ili"u."r with flowers andshrubs' Nelson Kino, who is the architect. on the projeit,-itated that he would workwith the Town enqinEir. Piper ieii-Iilt the curieit-ut*'una landscaping was a nicebuffer, and so ii was.imporiint io-rnor, *ttut ttre new i"nasiiping-would bi. The heightof the terraces was distussed and iiiien read seCtioni'ie.se.ozo A & B. NelsonKing repeated that it would also aepena upon what the Town-engineer required.
Pierce forwarded to DRB_the concern that there should be morebecause he felt the scare or tne-uuiiJings *us not accurate.
iele moved and Raoson seconded ve the variance qests because the qrantiot the variances wou not cons a grant ot sDecia vl tege, would no
n
lrimental to t c health sarety, or welfare to roperties or improvements
rao e varlance uas wamanted because re were exceptions ornar.y c rcumstances a cable to the site of t variance that did not applenerato ot r properties same zone. . rThe vo n lavor.
No. 4 on the agenda was to be considered last.
accurate draw'ings,
5.YSl9 fgrjx!9fjgT alt core lt 'in order to remoder theunprrd Lodse bu'ildins.@
Tom Braun explained that the staff was recommending tabling until the applicantllsubrni!.a.complete application. He added ttrat tfie-ippiiiant had reft a phonemessage that stated that if he did not get to the mtetihs,-lnut a work session beschedul ed.
est to amend Ordinance 30, Series of 1977 to i 1gqle thq number of units
o aEcn urlve rom 30 plus one employeeunitot 6. Bloc otato Patch.
Ilittll Pritz.explained the request, and stated the applicant,s rationale for therequested 5 additionar units. 'she presentea piojlit-lSmpa"isons between theapproved oriqinat oroject and the_pi^oposeo pr6je;;, ir;illi;g density, site coverage,height, setbacks, 'parling, iit. ptii'ii-iancscaping, and architecture. pritz thenused variance critlria,t6,'anatvzE-tn"'p"oporut' aii listed-other properties zoned byordinances that limited ttre nuiluer-;i 5iiilil'uni;;,';iliig"tnut these properties coutdmake similar reouests to increaiJ ttreir number of ailowed inits if it could be justifiedby the site plari. pritz siilea-inil-iire staff recorrnenaeo-aenial because to grantthe request wou'ld set a.precedeni, because the revised site plan did not warrant theadditional units, and it'wouia-6e'a-grint or speciar privilege.
,O-r- 8/13/84
Peter Jamar.,. representing the appricant, showed a model of the originalproposal. He reviewed the backli"ound oi zio Fotito-Fiictr and reminded theboard that when 77O_potato patcfr wii annexed in 1970, .ll7 units cou.ld havebeen constructed. _rn_1977 ttrii wis-aown-zoned to a maximum of 30 units. Headded that in the 1977 minutes, reieience was made to the fact that this processwas an "on-going" one,.designea to manage growth as-oppoiea-il ;;;.;iiin6'""'growth." Jamar felt that z6ning covJreO^more than just the number of unfts.He added that in 1977 the "pitiiuii'siw fit io-iitiii-iie-number of units. Theapplicant did not have a prbbtem ueciuse he intended io-dira large luxuriousunits' Jarnar pointed out'ttrat FtriJe-i *ar noi iiiit-t,]i""isfut and it was fettthat smaller uirits-wouto maiiet ro"e sr.cessfu'l]y, and 37 total cou'ld be builtwithin the allowabre-density ano heigit restricti6ns. ie pointed out thatthe reduction in GRFA propoiea aia-iEisen ttre masi,-ilre"iite ptan was definitelyimproved, as was the pirking.- tte stiied_that ilre-new'proposar only added twobedrooms and that 4 mbre pe6pre' weie-r.iriv-ioi"inii".iiriificant.
,lamar also pointed out that-cascade, the Marriott, and the sonnena.lp all hadbeen awarded increased aensiiy.--Jiru" t.tt ttat ir,""n"*"rit" plan was a definitebenefit to the neighbors. eu?r niilid, arctriteit-ior"tiie- new phase, pointedout that there was less.mass wtren itre-froiect wis vienuel-a, a whore. He felt. that Phase II was less dense ;itii il;e meaningful open space, that even thoughthe bui'ldinss were-Iar9er., in terri-ii sca'te iere noi il,ii significanily differentfrom those in the firs[ priase, -ina-rn'tiii on"-uuiilid';; the first phasewas larger in mass. --- - '- vs ' rg"'v r''
Piper read a letter in opposition from,John Thomas.. G"Iy Bossow adjacent propertyowner, and also representing.Warter and Gras!i, oin""-iajgcent property owners,|9aq a letter of olposition-*n whictr-ne stiiea'il,il-ir,ev"fiad au purchasedlEi:-pnt:fty on the-basis or pieient dav zoning, that more density wourdreouce property values. - ,
Pierce felt that the color of phase I made the project look larger than itwould have to. He had a hard time-retating to 6 additional units, but likedthe new site plan and the reduction'in enrA. -vieie-iiiiei urii-r,is-iiriiilv-did extensive repair to_phase I, out'iiaa no financiai-inie"est in phase II.viele shared Gorion's rid;-1"si1aing"if,"-a"nriiv-.ini""ii!, *," appearanceof Phase I, the imorovement in-the ;ite pl;;;-i;;";;;il-;Etoacks and improvedparking, but felt leneralty favoriUie.'
Rapson liked the ":uj.:!9,plan, especiarly the-idea that some parking was accessibreto the public, but wasn't suie it-wirrairtei-o "ii"i uiiis. Donovan fett thatthe project had a much-greater impaci iror a distanie-lhii'r"o1n up crose, thatfrom below the new builiings uncrjin;i ir,ow it-iiil;;d";il felt that the benefitsout weighed the disadvantages. She pointed out that there were no requestsfor variances, less.GRFA, iess.il" [6u"r.9e,0n earth covered park.ing area,and-that.the projec.t was-respondirs;;'nationai 'eiJ.driii-iiunges (the rarqerunits had been for Mexico.cily resiaents who w""e-no-iong";:-liiiribi'!l:..'tilouunwas rn favor of havins a docuirent riieJ-il,Ji;;;d-.i;;;iy ih;;;;i;;; nti,'-'.bought would be inforfred ttrat ttrev'ioiio not add additiona.l GRFA.
PEc -o-Qrrrrro
Piper stated that he was open to consideration_of revisions. He reminded the9:.f_!!-.1 ttrev,llg_Tgae ciransei ii iiscaae virrase that rerated to chanqes1n economic conditions. He siated tt'it aensiiy i6rt"Ji".iriiii"a""i-r'"irEiirparts' The site oran was.gooa ii-was-the. chanie-i;-;h; iJcation of the access.He fert that the ionaeniea"uniti-piriveo irrJriii,ivei"dii ;;'the site, but wasmore concerned (as was Rapson) *liit-ir'L massing of the 4 smalter units.
Bossow repeated his.concerns, and piper responded that there was knowledqeof this propertv and its poi6niiir'u5i'wtren'.poiiio-pui.i'ias ptatted. Jimar:!l!id that..they had contactea ieve"ii resr'aenis-ina-i;; receivea favorabteresponse' Mike Lauterbach said that he^knew oi-ut"i.ili rb untts at the potatoPatch club that were-fq id;'io""lioiiloo0 and up, and that it wourd be beneficiarto have smaller units at 770. ' '--r
'Jay Peterson stated that he had handled the.original zoning, that the numberof units was not a magic n;rL';;. -"-i"-aaa"a-ir,ii"F"tiio'ijit"n
had arways beenenvisioned as for mutit_ramiiy.untts"is ilii ;;-;o;-p"iil.i^vzs.condary zoninq.Peterson said that :rigiF!ii *'i,v-rtui"rtated.that thev wo'u1a do 30 units, 6utthe Town did not sav that ilrev co"urJ-not buiro:o-u,iii"s. ile added-that if todayprices are needed ti, be ld;;", ii-*ir"irportant to gei-the-square footage down.
Patten stated that the board needed to focus on the issues. This site is not unlikeother sites. Manv other sites_i".-pi"trv fini;hJ, "iih-oin"", not yet started.Patten said that ir,ii wis-i-p"riiv i;:;g.ol T1j9l importance. He asked what wasunique about this situation'' ana iaaei-that if the FEi inJ-ronn council feet tharchanges shou'td be made in-lt'"-iyp"-oi-piinniig j6r.,-in."rtutr wourd rike somedirection. To grant rno." ,niti","JnI'sfiouto rooi at,trairii, utitities, what thearea can hold. ,
,Jamar stated that i{ gyerVory agreed that this was a better plan, the board hasthe ability to amend the irrdinaice.- -"'
Piper asked if the g9u:l9p.t courd.use the. revised. site pran without the 6 extraunits, and Jamar said thal-it-nii-o".ia.g ttut ir,is,numU6"-would make a successfulproject. Donovan asked why ir,i-vuii-iiiiui!-ini pi"jlli ,u, so different thateverything had been changei. Sne-iaaeo that. in rearity when the proposed phaseII was buil t' it wourd afpear imirie"-inun-ir,."oi.iiinii iii:Jborar
Patten stated that this decision would apply to. other sites, and if approved someoneelse woutd come in *i.', i-."ir"lt"ii';.;[;i";r,"ii:'ir.iiiiv]
Pierce stated that he-wanted the project to be successful, and that the pEC shouldlook at each project on its o*n rni"iil]-
d d al the Town Councilti ona the fac hat there was a better site olan
the
qRFA,
I nec -s- s/13/s4
varfanc and tnati ona
st
to come in and request additional
at the docLment mentio
Piper felt the same improvements
number of units.
c
were r
econom
square footage wouTil no osscoul d be Ffl ed-lu-T-tfiET right--oTsquare footage could not be taken
6tf.t
individual s
away.
The_vote was 4 in favor.with I (piper) against.could have been achieved withoui iiir,iaiing tte
o *fu*Wb,*
T0: planning and Environmental cornmission
- \,&(l',0i ) ,, .\ r - tFR0M: community Development Department - t0q^[ doaumomtt lim'\u 1r'nt - eeid^-\b-\Jil-.-k5fnitl .DATE: Ausust 8, rs84 il^r*,tp,*x n5[r,N,,ge gb^r
SUBJECT: A request to amend 0rdinance 30, series of tetT tbttilJf.?I ?llf,XtTT^5,,
ffi ii,.ii,*'iiiii*ll;ii, :;.:;ritit:"s;"i;ii':i"iff l"r:!.11, ffi*1g/d^ld- f"/Tr,t'\I. REQUEST {'tteA l'hW
U
The applicant is requesting to increase the number of allowed units from 30 plus
r.+,! :tis' ffi i"ir' F"l:n'3, tl'i,1, !:i*ii;i,iirl:;:, i;J"3;;ii:;1.';;iti'
; i;i"# il *l| g^qgxiqr,rn of 30 units whiti;t;i";;g the MDMF zone district. In october ofI l98l the owner requested an ameniment to 0rdinance 30 to allow one additiona.lI employee unit. The amendmeninui ipp"oved._ presentry, phase I of the projectI has been completed. -.|6 uniii pius-[he caretaker unit-have been buitt. The 0r-I d'inance-would allow fgr an aoaitionii 14 unitJ to ue constructed for phase iI.frhe.applicant would like to i*"na-ijruinanie jo io iirdw"in additional 6 unitsllo be built in phase II witnJui foin! ou." the atowed GRFA.
A. Applicant's Rationale for the Additional Six Units
The applicant believesthatthe benefits of the proposed amendment far outweighany negative aspects. .
The results of the amendment and thus the approval of 15g new plan for phhse IIare the following:
l. A substantia'l increase in the amount of open space availabre for land-scaping. The amount of site coverage tras'ueen-reari.a'i.o, the previousPhase II plan bv,3,389 sq. rt.- ite"tol;i ;i;; io"".ii"'or the 770 projectwill be 22% of itre'iile ds opposel-tg z+ % for the oiiginat proposar.The allowed covergge jn ure i,i,jmirvli"iJnaa"v-i"ii=ui!iiict which isadjacent to the si[e is 20%, a.d t"nirerore the revised plan will be morecompatible with the surrounding neigtruortrooi i, i;;;'oi op"n space andI andscaping.
2' A-reduction in the proposed GRFA. The revised pran for phase II isplanned to contain.a enrn of 22,s5r 9e. g1 as opposed to the ailowed24,216.:q. ft. This.reduciion-,ii-i,6s9 sq.-it.'fiiii-"eiurt in the projectconta'ininq ress buir.ding.mass than ihe prdvioui;i;;,'even ilroush-t[i.i--"wil I be additionat awet l"inl-Inil;.' -
3. The number of bedrooms within the project wil,l increase in phase II from42 previouslv oroposed to 44. we io not believe ir,ai i additional bedroomswill signifiiairttiT .iie.-any'or"iti'utp".ts of the project.
770 Potato On -a s/B/s4
In sumnary, I think you will find if you.read the minutes of the meetingat which 0rdinance 30 of 1977 was ado-pted anc iiso ttre intent of the 0rdinancethat our request makes good_sense and does not do anything to vioiiie-orjeopardize the Ordinance. The proposal, tn iicil iern"s to achieve muchmore confonnity and compatibility with the existing neighborhooa ttran-aiAthe previous design.
In 1977 when the 0rdinance_placing the unit restriction upon the propertywas adopted' the.Planning Directoi stated at thi iime that,,the process isan.ongoi.ng one,.designed-to manage growth as oppoied-t6"cJntroitini-i"owtn.,'This indicates that the intent wis iertaintv nbl-io-pror'i6ii'i'.."i"in"*ountof flexibility and ability for re-eva'luatioi oi-cirtain pi"i"it-oi-p-p""tvthrough-time as is requested with this proposal.--t{e believe-ttral t[e-lnoer-lying.MDMF.zone district designation aliowi ttrat fiexibilttv wigr inis-siteand that the proposal crearly-presents some poiitive resurts.
II.
Lot Size
Area over 40%
Buildable area
3.92 acresslope .22 acres
3.70 acres
j
oRD. 30
56,4'10 sf
3l units
9.583@
sf
sfsf
lnour enrn/ Totat unitsr- al lowed
MDMF ZONE
56,410 sf
66 units
Phase I existing GRFA 32,194 sf
Phase II allowed GRFA 24,2'16 sf
Total GRFA 56,410 sf
Phase I existing units
Phase II a]lowed units
Total units
17l4
3l
770 Potato PuO 4- 8/8/84
BACKGROUND ON THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW30 UNITS IAIITH MDMF Z0NING FOR LOT 6
The purpose of the Growth.Management Project was to identify properties thathad inconsistent zoning with the surrouniing neighborhood ai i,reii-ui io rlmeayprev'ious zoning_problems. In .|970, when th6 profierty was annexed Uy itre iown,the MDMF zone allowed ll7 units toi Lot o. Ol.lginaiiv, the Subcommittee discussed
191o1ing the property to Residential Cluster. ine ptinning and Environmentat
.uonunission voted for a compromise between the Subcommittee'and ,:ohn Hiii-(owner)that would maintain the MDMF zoning but limit the unit number to 30. It wasfelt that the Potato Patch area hai a character itrii reflected roi" "*p"nsiv"and-larger lromgs. By keeping the MDMF zone, the owner was allowed ttte'neeOeaGRFA to build large units compatibre with the su*ounding area.
III. PROJECT COMPARISONS
The fol'l owing figures compare the original Phase II to the proposed phase II.
A. DENSITY
Uni ts
GRFA
Original Phase II
14 units
24,216 sf
Proposed Phase II
'20 units
22,557 sf
Di fference
sf underThe new proposal stays within the allowed GRFAthe original proposal 's GRFA. '1,1 ,,', r !.rlr,! r ,
and is
. ' ;i
ri
Existing Phase
phase
Ori g i nal
22,252 sf
Proposed
22,252 sf.|5,400 sf
37,652 sf
22.0 %
III
Total s i te coverage,4'l ,041 sf
Site Coverage %24.0 % !
ttd ir,r
\\b
- C.\\L{
Ir)\i\rlf r\o
f;:# 'dd,{', 'n[ Qp.^spcr-r n \\r
r&,,1, roq.l,0,\yA'^'t fr,.jal \{o h\q 0ra , .,i .'', 1 ' ,'t1' J 1 1r' / " ,\.:
t C. HEIGHI
the
of
the
up
770 PotaJatch -4- g/8/84
propo
proposed
proposed
proposed
proposed
propo
proposed
proposed
f-','l 1r,'.u'' jY;?= to J4.5 + rt. The four single units on the northeait end oi tie projectit';i " will. have.fqishts,ranging from 23.5t to 26t feet. The trighesi portions{LS' tf 1\f T#if,tJr'in both cases) are on the south sides of tfie-uuiiainss.-
. r In respect_t<i impacts. of height., the original proposal locates the units+',{e0b.-e@]ttowever,.it'|-'assoftheunitsisbroken
*urrq:,q5Bllli'.ffi",I!.ri3'}i.l.o53E.;ii*fi::,f:-l:il.'*fi,,r.ft1oN tne . singie units on the northeast corner of the site.t-'\
CusI
l',- \r,,r||,1r, If-ortgilu].-lfpg:ll-l9r.flu:t rI had heishts that ranged between?G-ts-3Z.Is
xr:[gP1q
$ini"f"'l ,. d' 'xi,1 r ," Patch Drive. The units localgd hetw"o."i,'. 'iu,n infar^inn ,.^..tc r.,6F^ +^ r-^'l ,t:' '.i,1 , - Patch.D"iv" "" .n r,"
1.. ,; ;'.{rlil* tt'o storv ' r..r r.
i,l:,i,f)t' Il the revised ploposal, the four buildings witl have heights ranging between
lglt'Y I'ntl'| 29;!=,to 34.5 t'ft. The four singii unili-on the northeast end of the orojec
the heights _for- both buildingtar€_rdfJun theErole (35 ft flat roofs, Se-rt-iloffilEdii1,..-r ,4s \!re, I r, I rsL ,,uut 5, Jo If Sloplng roots),lgyl::! pryposal wiil have a greater height impacl aue io-irris centratizationbuildings on the site.and the lreater hetlhts. 'rn tfie-o"iginat proposui;-'-'units were temaced into the iite. The riass or ine uuiiaingr n"r itso 6rotenI'lilSi3li-.f,ioolilBli1.E'ils;",3 s" i'-
Original Phase II
Large triplex
Tri olex
-,"aDup1ex
Medium Duplex9nall Duplex
Revised Phase II
$uu tt
p\cn5
Site Coverage
4'465 sf
3,540 sf
2,930 sf
2,476 sf
2,448 sf
Site Coverage
-1,?sf I (
I
1
2
1
I
BuiIding
Bui I di ng
Bui l di ng
1
23(4
6,424 sf
6,424 sfsingle 2,552 sfunits)
Iex in the oriqinal
]F"l=:-1r11 fe^ggnsidered'when, compariirs irre two propoiars;9ifl:fng 9I^-L359 sf. between the ti,,o j;is;; 6iiiriir6r"iJi
a site qf 4,465 s-r..luttlli:rMihheights. The
each project
i: _ :ig' i li!911-qlysr'. to. i nd icate. that the "iev i i ei nriiiir;;wi l'l have greaterheight impacts. ttre Uuitainqs will idue to the combined
r to be larger in the revised-proposal
770 notalatch -5- 8/8/84
D.SETBACKS
The required setback of 20 feet on all sides
each proposal.of the property is maintained 1n
PARKI NG
Total Required Parking
Original Phase II
28 spaces
Proposed Phase II
40 spaces
T
Al 1 28 spaces for
Phase II provides
P99g-sPacet
the original Phase
23_g1l1ge spaces,
SITE
The rev i sed
F.PLAN/LANDSCAPI NG
ra open space al so achieved by
be located within building(s)
Both proposa'l s meet this
of ad en space f
is
by
re).
It@!,g-J..L and shortening a roadarea.
qmgunt of landscapinq remajns the same in each proposal . Bothproposals ]n-eTliile a series of ear the swimming
removi ng
l eadi ng
an
to @nects Phaie
the caretaker' s unitlitrffiWte-
$The proposed.Phase II has a new road cut that provides access into Phase II onthe north side from Potato Patch Drive. 'The pi^evious road into the,project becomesh dead end. Access between Phases I and II ii'.r ttre current proposit is [ossible-ontyf.|ilg_lhe.pedestrian wa'lkways_. -The proposal results in a 37 unit prbject having-tnree separate access drives off of potato patch Drive.
pool area.. ed
]J!=gach :j-!S-p]-g!. The revised proposal does create a stronger landscaped bufferDetween Phase I and Phase I.I. The original proposal establishes a strong, landscapedbuffer between the road and the north iide of phase II.(- - \_
'i:. r n\ 00r\dl-.J.\, - \ -^ .t,Jr\\.t\' 1.. l0{2y'; \iit ,
.II would be g:qse_pg1$JS. . Ih" proposed
14 eartn covereo spaces, and z surtace
Under MDMF zoning, 50% of the required parking mustor be hidden from public view by a landscaped-berm.parking requirement.
770 Potato taf -o- 8/8184
IV. CRITERIA
The
the
are
variance criteria is,being used.to analyze this proposal because, althoughapplicant is requesting an amendment to Ordinance 30, the related issues-similar to those issues concerning a zoning variance. when the 30-unit re-
s
borhood
that both
ndineiohborhogd,weEe arldrqssed.in depfh. .Staff feels that the variance review nroiT6an appropriate forma! fpr discussing-tlle,impacts,ot the applicantisJequest.' t.,i"tll
ib"qrutionrt ii'qd'lt[." ,r"rYHS*J.rl.:r'!'ttl..'f .il',rltf S'I 'lorut"t.' *"-]"
,r.1.-,,i pilrr";j;,,lii,
i,b (nerggRThe-propert! i's surrounded by Agricultural/Open space zon$ng and Plimaryfsecona#y '-
'j!.al- /l residential properties. The.fact-tha+ both ^ypFn.e'lc "r"o njoqe tn tta 20% sit€)) )''' " cov ts
ttlJ ,.rTfe revised proposal will add an extra road cut to the project, decrease interna'l
fiiit-g,Ufqirculation by taking out an interior road, and centralize-buiiding mass in 4\'P- - clusters. . The. reYise4-propqsal is different fromPhase 1 in that mass and_bqLk 1IOAJ
l'
he deqree which re] ief from the strict or litera'l inte retation and enforcementa specif ati on s necessarv to ac eve un ormreatmentntvtclnattar n ectlves otle without ant sDecl a rl vl le
0rdinance 30 was developed with the intent to strive to treat property owners
The 30 unit limit
deEiST6il would be a grant of ial privil to
ffi1"'lnu.ffi.-ffi#ftHffi;the fair t
After briefly researching other properties zoned by ordinanc6that'l imit thenumber of allowed units, it became evident that there are other properties thatgpuld mqke a similar request to increase their number of allowed'units.V$9lv;n
Exampl es :
t.1.02 acres, 44,431 sf
LDMF Zone: A'llowed 9 unitsRestricted to 8 units, 2 of which must be employee units
3.
Patch:.997 acres, 43,429 sf
MDMF zone: Allowed l7 unitsRestricted: 8 units
2.89 acres, .|25,932 sf
LDMF Zone: Allowed 26 unitsRestricted: l6 units
More properties probab'ly exist that are under these same condi ti ons.'l tr :^l. .fHJ
f6
road cut would cat the same time,three separate road
770 Potatltch -7- 8/8/84
ress for cars going
and eqress to the
own
nro*ners who_-have qlleady bu
vantage of additionll lnfts
he effect of the uested variance on li ht and air distribution of ul ati on,ransportation a ratt r c es and upub lic safety.
+
'tn
ltl-.-
I'i:i I
f f t'
The additionalto Phase II butsite by having
!
t
II
I
Removaloftheinterwi.|1providemore1andscapedar9a.HoweveFTT-createsasffito.)jo,PotatoPatchwhol
take,the.wrong entry into the project will have to turn around, exit onto potato
Patcn ur'lve, and re-enter the site on the upper entrance. Internal vehicularcirculation in a 3l unit project is certajnly an achievable goal . The removatof the internal road may create some traffic-congestion in phase I occasionally.
{it
, the number or,nitS'up;;;;;'r;; ffii;;;;;:"i;: '[;i:;'inlil]'il.i3,iluiiii,:---recommends denial of the request.
Staff reconmends denial of the teguest to add 6 units to Phase II of 770 potato
Patch Club. It is felt that the ievised site plarr does not warrant the additionalunits.-- A1 iowing the 6 units is considered to be a grant of specia'l pr.ivitege,-as all_property owners have restrictions placed on ihe number of uniis that"ihe.yare allowed to build. This is the zoning system whjch the community tras aaopiei,endorsed and built under for l7 years. ir ine pEC and Counc'i I find merit ;n'siudyingzoning systems which allow additicnal density on multi-family sites for certaintrade-offs, then we can,proceed toward that 6nd. How"u"i, cir"ieniiy *",rri-proceed bytrgglt\tl ,e tnis application under existing zoning regutitions. rir grant thb 6ll]t: frld set a.precedent that would allow all piopeity owners to r6quest to increase
STAFF RECOMMENDATION \,
Staff reconmends denia
Potato
Villa
a safer ress and in
=J
LJF
tt1
Jz
(5
Eo
*l
\NS
-,S
wI"
+S
€."
t9
fo-tf,
l{sae
August 20, L984
Town Council
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage RoadVail, Co 8L657
RE: 770 Potaro Patch Drive
Condominiums
Dear Council l{embers:
Please be advised that Lamar Properties, Inc-, a DelawarecorporaEion ("Lemar"), is the owner of ten of the condominiumunits loeated in Phase I of 770 Potato Patch Drive Condominiums,Vai1, Colorado.
By this letter, Lamar does hereby sEate iEs approval of and
concurrence with the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental
Cornnission's recomrendation to the Town Council on August 3, 1984,for approval to amend Ordinance 30, Series of L977 to increasethe number of units allowed to be constructed at 770 Porato PatchDrive, from 30 plus one employee unit to 36 plus one employeeunit, located on Lot 6, Block 2, Pot.aEo Patch, pursuant Eo theexisting plans for Phase 1I of 770 PotaEo Patch Drive Condominiumssubmitted to the Town of Vail- by the applicanE, Ed A. Smith.
Very Truly Yours,
LAMAR PROPERTIES, INC., ADelaware corooration
WJP/cndcc: Peter Kalkus
ecretary
Potato Pat.ch 770 CondomLnlum Aesoclation
770 Potato Patch DrLve
Val-l, Colorado
Auguet 2L, L984
Vall Town Councll
Vall, Colorado
Dear Sirs,
Following ig a listing of condomlnlun owners as of today.
Unlts 1,2,4 16,8,9r 11,13,14, and 25.
Lamar Propertlee, Inc., A Delaware Corporatioa
Units 3,7 and 12.
H. B. F. Enterprlses Incorporated, A
Unlt 5 - Terry L. Barnhart & A1lce P. Barnhart
Untt 10 - Lawrence C. llarris
Unlt 15 - Guillerno Huerla Grados and Veronlca
Caretakerrs - Ed A. srltit, an raaivri,lal '
Texas Corporation
Huerta, Joint teoaats
Please contact me if you have any firfther qgeritlond.
ml:MP
Kenneth B. Wilson
792 Potato Patch Dr.
Vail, CO 81657
VAIL TOh/N COUNCIL
Dear Council Members,
As owner of Lot IlA, Vail Potato Patch
being made to adjust the meximum number
Pstch.
Subdivision I support the request
of units in Phase 11,770 Potato
I believe that the improved site plan, utilizEtion of less GRFA End site
coverage, €nd irnproved vehicular access will be an oversll improvement to
the neighborhood.
'enneth D.
792 Potato
I r/-
Wilson
Patch Drive
Sincere ly,
.k."l llI hiA l,\i\A ri SSOCIA] i.S
iicsort I'larrning
August 3, 1984
Mr. Peter Patten, Jr.
Town of Vail
Cornmunity Development Director
75 South Frontage RoadVaiI, CO 81657
Dear Peter:
' I have just received a Public lriotice, regarding a hear-
ing to take place August 13, 1984. Specifically, agenda iten
#7, increasing the number of units from 30 to 36. Since I am
unable to attend, a few cogent comments are in order.
It is a travesty to think the T.O-V. would even consider
at this point increaiing the density aX 770, or anywhere-else
in VaiI, from 30 to 35 units. After adherence on VID IIrs
part to the regs of the T.O.V., and after numerous meetings
and dj-scussions with the powers to be, 30 units 5:1us a care-
takers, was the decision rnade. It was presented to the com-
munity, to the lenders, to everyone else in the universe, as
a 30 unit, 2 phased project, not 36' not 50, and very serious
consideration should be given to keeping it that way-
A number of economic reasons caused us to seIl 770
Potato Patch, PaY off our loan, take our lumps and go on to
other things. For someone now, at this clate, to cone and
ask the T.O.V. to make the deal- a littIe more attractive' to
make the figures a little more presentable, to bail thern out
without arry financial repercussions is an absurdity-
Get a grip Peter, stand by the original zoning and G.R.F.A.
God knows the T.O.v. was alwavs an oak to us and not a wi-llow.
Don't bend now.
One thing to keep in mind, regardless of rumor, innuendo,
newspaper articles, whatever, we are sti11 around Peterr PaY-ing taxes and watching with amazement, the T-O-V. at work.
'BQl'rut
B. Thomas
hear from me once aqain.
,{_
IL
P.S. I knew you would be
$ Jh#r, ttut,
August 2Arl9g+,
The Hono::able Rocl Sllfer & Council llembers,
Town of VaiI,
Va1l.
Dear I'1r. Iriayor and Town Councll l,iembers,
ret
Please be aclvlsed that 1. Luc Irieyer, resident-owner of B1J Potatolatch (Lot 1 Block 1), an strongiy opposed to any variance
concernlng //0 Potato Patch.
This pnoject has been a hardship on the neighborhood and any
increase ln denslty will be a disaster. As everyone knows, the
road. is a, d.angerous one, especially 1n wj.nter and is deteriorating
rapid.1y.
The deslgn of the whole project 1s unlfor:n at the moment, but it
seems that that w111 all change 1f they are to increase the
nunbers of unlts and also add another storey to the bu11d.lngs.
As of today, l-and.scaping, plles of dlrt and constructlon debrls
are stlll vis1ble. The road and corner is dangerous and after
the flrst flasco by the first developer, I hope that the Town
Council will turn d.own any request of varlance.
Li5 and fuc lleyn
Box 176 Vul, Colorada srcst
Pfrone 303-476-K96
tocaltd in tfre SitSma& t"odge
August l-9, I9&+.
Tor The Honorable Rod Slifer and Town Council l4enbers.
Rer 770 Totato -fatch Varlance.
As a ooncerned resld ent of the ?otato iatch tlevelopment and
reslding at 800 Potato Patch Road, 1. would strongly llke to oppose
any change that llO ?ota.to latch 1s requestlng to lncrease the
denslty of their d.eveloprnent.
l{e have been lnforrned that they wish to lncrease the number ofunits and also rnake the bulldlngs more than two storles hlgh.
Ue are opposed to any increase in the clensity of our area dueto the fact that the road ls so dangerous, especially ln winter.
The road ls already starblng to cave in at the ?iney Road turn off.
Thank you for your understandlng and Cbjectlvity,
Tinlna and Xavler Velasquez.
800 ?otato Patch Road,
//l/i '- ela'*tvu -'-\\-
-uu*
:.;,'lilh?I,i",,,,u?, uo.
HougToN tx 7r057 a0Ar.r
I
a
I
a
I
o
I
T
o
I
o
a
o
l>
I
t
o-
IPilBNEZ CgP DVRBlX 0tr20 1042A EET
06/20l6{ lcs
TDEN HOUSION
4r0 1477332330 0l? 7t1a665967 MGtl
o
TOI{N OF VAIL
ATTN ROD E SLIFER AND VAIL TONN COUNCIL
COI.IMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONI'ENTAL COI'II'IVAIL I4UNICIPAL BLDGVAIL C0 81657
THIS IS A CONFIRI.IATION COPY OF A TELEGRAt.{ TDDFEStED TO YOUi
STRONOLY OPPOSE REOU?8? BY gD A SIIITI.I ?O INCREASS NUI'IBER Of UNITI ?O
BE CONIITRUCTED AI '70 POTAIO PATCTI DRIVE LOCATEO IOT 6 ELOCX 2 VIIL
POTATO PAICII SUEDIVISION ANY TNCRE^8E tN OENSITY }IILL SEVERELY
ACOREVATE TRAFFIC ACCESE LOCATED ON CRITTCAL BLIND CURVE OF FOTATO
PATCH DRIYE. DEVELOPI.IENT OF FTRET PHASE OF 770 tI A DISAST;R AND ANY
INCREASE rlILL HAVE A SUEETAN?IAL OEVALUA?ION OF PROPERTY IITHIN THEIIUBDIYISION URCEI.ITLY RIOUgST YOUR REJECTTON OF Tt{II AIIENDMENI
C T TRAYLOR JR 797 POTAIO PATCH V^tL COa4ol FouNlrIN vIEh SUtrE 40a
HousT0r'l f x f7}sl
10i44 EsT
frcMc0MPo
L
I
t
I
I
t
a
-qt
Fil
:t
U TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM MESSAGE, SEE REVERSE SIOE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL. FREE PHONE NUMBERS
t'IJ AGCY vAtL Et!o
Io,
a',c'. Eli5a;grt'01e-l.l
LtQ >1a1"' '-1-7-7< L-t-o
a
o
a
I
o
o
o
o
A,ITIIIU\rt#
@
o
o
o
o
a
TtItI
Et!ut!f
=.o
EIII
Eogt!f
6'
a
a
E:o;
ut
g
II-l
ol E
TI
l!gt!
6'
o
o
o
ts g
UIol3IT--
ol
TU AGCY VAIL
nu tNFouAsrER l-ot0a??Atgg oglaol94lcs tpliMvlu MvN _..-__\.q2?o r og-20 otzzP cor d-vrn 'Tl',X gtO3p00g6t UU eCCvrl-etUl-ol30srJz33 ogl20/94lLX LIMITED coL. DLY PDol. DLY coLUMBUs oHro AUG 20R'ls MAyoB RoD sLtFERr. DELIUER. DoN'T pHoNE
IOUN OF VAIL :
?5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROADverl colonapo 8r6s?
GENTuEttEtt r1ou ARE pREsENTLy coNsrDERING tNcREAsTNG THE cAPActrY 0F THE
EXISTING GONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON POTATO PATCH.I gOULD URGE YOU, IN THE STRONGEST UAYT TO REI'ECT THA? IDEA.TIIAT PROJECT HAS SERTOUSLY ALTERED THE CHARACTER OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY. EXPAIIDING tT BEYONL PLAN COULD FURT}IER
ETERIORATE POTATO PATCH AND VAIL.I TIAVE OUNED A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR 6.YEARS AND IFESENT SUCH A LOS.OUALIIY PROJECT BEING BUIL?. I RESENT ITEING LOCERED EVEN FURTHER TO SOLVE A POOR FINANCIAL^ DECISION
SrITS' fli8"oi"ffi '8AIIuE"!"0'bofr tEnUS!E r$n$fi EsrlN rEfi rAr$HEArcH'
FRorrEcTN As tr stANDs FULLv occuplED, clLL CREATE A suBsrANTtaL
SAFETy pRoBLEu FoR pEDEsrRlANSr As UELL ASr AUT0MoBILES 0N tHE
FRONTAGE R0AD AND POTATO PATCH R0AD.I URGE YOU ?0 REJECT THIS FRTVOLOUS IDEA. FURTHER, I URGE YOU10 ?AI(E I{UCH STRONGER POSITIONS ABOUT MAINTAINING A HIGHER <'7
dJALITy tN THE TorrN oF vAIL.I.ESLTE H. WEXNERTELEX 245962
1306 EST
r33e EST
o
o
'=ri
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
J-
I
t-008I74C213 08/?0/54 lCt00egt M00REgT0[N NJ 00.20 lPfifi0zN HTN DvRa02ttP E8l r{0ztl
t
I
I
t_
t
I
I
t
o
a0
l\l
:
6lt
MAYOR ROD SLIFER
TO}IN OF VA I L75 SOUTIJ FRONTAOE RO
VAIL C0 81657
l-010703A213 0d/20tsuICg IPMT'tV IU MVN
02704 08-20 0tqgP C0T f,tVIRICg IPMt,l0ZZ
NDA PLS FONE DELETE DLY
l-0t305tJe33 0g/20/84rlx LIHITED COL DLY PD0t DLY CoLUMAUS 0Ht0 AUo a0
PMII MAYOR ROD SLIFERI DELIVER DONIT PHONE
TO}IN OF VAIL
75 S0UTfi FR0NTA0E RoA0vAlL c0L0RAD0 81657
THI9 13 A CONFIRMATION COPY OF A I{EESAGE ADDREI]gEO TO YOU
GENTLEMEN I
YOU ARE PRESENTLY CONSIDERIN6 INCREAgINO Tt{E CTPACITY OF THgEXIg?ING CONDOIIINIUI.{ PROJECT ON POTATO PATCI{,I }|OULD URGE YOU, IN THE SIRONCEIT TAY, TO RE.IECI 1I{AT IDEAI
THAT PROJECT IIA9 SERIOUSLY ALTIRED THE CHARACTER OF THE
NEICHBORHOOD ALREADY. EXPANDINO IT BEYOND PLAN }IOULO TURII{ER
OETERIORATE POTATO PATCH AND VAIL.I HAVE OI.INED A SINGLE,FAMILY RE$IOENCE POR 6 YEARS ANO trRE8ENT SUCH A L0l{.6g1gtTY PROJEC? BeINC BUIL?. I RggENT l?BEING LOI.IERED EVtN FURTHER TO SOLVE A POOR FINANCIAL D:CIItOIITO THE LOSS OF THg CITY ANO ALL THE HOME OI{NERI ON FOIATO PA?CH,
POIATO PATCII IS HAZARDOUS AND DANOEROUT IN IHE I{IIiIERI TIIE
PR0JECTN A8 IT EtANDg FULLY 0CCUPIEDT IIILL CRTATE A SUBSTANTIAL
SAFETY PROBLEIl FOR PEDEgTRIANSI I8 NELL ASI AUTOi.tOEILEI ON II{E
FRONTACE ROAD AND PO?A?O PATCIT ROADII URGE Y0U T0 REJECT THIS PRlv0!0Ut IDEA. FURTI{ERr I URGE Y0U?O TAKE MUCH 9TRONOER POSTTION6 ABOU? I'IAIN?AINING T HIGHER
OUA!ITY IN THE TO{N OF VAILT
LESLIE HIiIEXNER
?ELEX e4535a
TO REPLY 8Y MAILGRAM MESSAGE, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL. FREE PHONE NUMBERS
o
a
T
I
I
o
o
I
o
I
t
t
o
o
o
a
o
lilbiIi3-i:-vl:"!!xt
EOAil
o
Mr. Fred H. Bartlit, Jr.
778 Potato Patch DriveVail, Colorado
August 20, 1984
Tor^rn of VaiI, Town CouncilVail, Colorado
Dear Coucilmen:
This letter sets forth rny postiion as a Potato Patch horneowner
regarding the pending 770 Potato Patch Road variance.
Because of the previous scrupulous enforcement of zoning and
other land use restrictions, the Town of VaiI has achieved a
unique postion in both the residentiaf and tourist markets.
Having just completed a home in Potato Patch, f am personally
ahtare of the conscientious enforcement of zoning which heretofore
existed. while the lengthy period reguired to secure approvals
from the town caused me manv problems, the result justified
the effort.
Now, after having complied with Vail's land use restrictions
at substantial cost and inconvenience' it now appears that the
laws of the Town of Vail may be selectiyely enforced depending
on who is invol-ved. The issue is one of fairness. Everyone
is entitled to have the laws applied equally, regardless of
the circumstances. I, too, would have liked to have more room
for people in my home, but like everyone else to date, I compliedwith the density restrictions.
This is an important issue. If financial considerations can
override long-range land use planning, the Town of Vail is headed
downhill. Vail could become just another mountain town. fi^tenty
years of effort to create and preserve a unique community will
be wasted.
The Town Council is facing a pivotal issue. Please make a decision
consistent with long range future of the valley.
Sincerely '
L
Fred H. Bartlit, Jr
, -'7- ..
', ,- LL' LL L t ..
Atrgust 2L, L984
VaiI Itryn Oouncil
Itcrvm of VailVail, Colorado
Dear @uncil l"lanbers,
As pa::t orrer of Lcl- 25, Bloclc I, Vail Potato Patdr Subdivision, I arn
sulcrnitting this letter in slpponb of tlre request being nnde by t'lr. Ed$nitlr for revising tlp nuber of ctrelling writs frcrn 30 to 35 at 770
Potato Patctr.
I agree wit}r the Planning arri frrvi:roruental Ccnmissiqr that t}re p:ro-ject will rpt have any negaLive jnpac'ts and will acbrally be an fur-
trxovefient over ttre existing appro\/ed p1a.
Sincerelv,.t&My'wiui.n o,rddy I
Bo)< 331 /VaiI, Colorado
August 20, 1984
Town Council
Town of Vail75 S. Frontage RoadVail, CO 8L657
RE: 770 Potato Patch Drive
Condoroinir:ns
Dear Council Members:
Please be advised that Lamar properties, Inc., a Delawareeorporation ("Lemar"), is the owner oi ten of fhe condominiumuni-ts located in Phase r of 770 potato patch Drive condominiums,Vail, Colorado.
By this letter, Lernar does hereby state its approval of andconcurrence hrith the Town of vail planning and Enviionmentalcornmission's recotrmendation to the Town c6uncil on August 3, Lgg4,f-or approval to amend ordinance 30, series of L97i to-increasethe number of units all-owed to be constructed at 770 potato patchDrive,-from 30 plus olre enployee unit to 36 plus one employeeuit, located on Lot 6, Block- 2, PoEato patcir, pursuant to theexisting plans for phase rr of l7o potato pat6n^ Drive Gondominiumssubmitted to the Town of Vail by the applicant, Ed A. Smirh.
Very Truly Yours,
I"AMAR PROPERTIES, INC., ADelaware corporation
WJP/cndcc: PeEer Kalkus
ecretary
o
Potato Patch 770 Condominlun Associatlon
770 Potato Patch DriveVal1, Colorado
August 2t, L984
Vall Town CouncLlVall, Colorado
Dear Sirs,
FoJ.J.owing is a lLsting of condornlnium owners ae of today.
Unlts 1r2,4,6,8,9,11,13, L4, and 25.
anar Propertles, Tnc., A Delaware Corporation
Unlts 3r7 and 12.
H. B. F. Enterprises Incorporated, A Texas Corporation
Unlt 5 - Terry L. Barnhart & Alice P. Barnhart
Unit 10-- Larrrence C. Harris
Unlt 15 - Guillerno Huerta Grados and Veron{ca Huerta, Joint tenants
Caretakerr e - Ed A. Smlth, an lndivldual
Please contact me if you have any further questions.
Slncerelv.
t///ru
Michael C. PovroznikAssociation ltanager
nl-:MP
Kenneth D. h/ilson
792 Potato Patch Dr.
VEil, CO 81657
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
Dear Council Members,
As owner of Lot I lA. Vail Poteto Pateh
being mede to Bdjust the maxirnum number
Patch.
Subdivision I support the request
of units in Phase 11.770 Potgto
lbelieve that the improved site plan, utilization of less GRFA and site
coverage. and improved vehicular access will be en overall improvement to
the neighborhood.
enneth D.
792 Potato
I-r/*
Wilson
Patch Drive
Sin cere ly,
PROPEC' THAT HAVE ORDINAN.ES
THAT RESTRICT THE NUMBER OF UNITS*
PARCEL ACREAGE OF UNITS
l. Sun Vail 4.92 60Lot 9. Blk 2,Potato Patch
3.79
3. Talon Townhomes 7.27
Lot 'l . B]k 3
Li onsri dgeFiling 3
4. Lionsridge 1.81
Fif ing 3
Lot 27 B'lk 2
5. Lot 34 Blk 2 .997
Potato Patch
5. Lot'26 Blk 2 2.89Vail Villagel3th FiI ing
MDMF ZONE WITH ORDINANCE MDMF ZONE ALLOWED
RESTRICTION ON NUMBER UNITS'18 un'its/acre
130
88
68302. LionsridgeFiling 3
Parcel B
48
32
t7
26
t5
l6
PARCEL
7. Getty Oil Site 'l .02
ACREAGE LDMF ZONE WITH ORDINANCE LDMF ZONE ALLOWED
RESTRICTI0N # 0F UNITS UNITS 9 units./acre
8
(2 units must be
empioyee units)
'9
The total number of additional units for these properties if given MDMF zoningis 175 units. If each property were granted a ?0% density increase over the -
existing allowable (column 2), there would be 35 additional units.
*Our time period for this research does not allow us to state that this list isall-inclusive of properties in this situation.
Q*orr*rrrs THAT HAVE oRDTNA*rrrO
THAT RESTRICT THE NUMBER OF UNITS*
PARCEL
3.79
3. Talon Townhomes 7.27Lot l Blk.3
Li onsridge
Fil ing 3
4. Lionsridge 'l .81Filing 3
Lot 27 B1k 2
5. Lot 34 B]k 2 .997Potato Patch
6. Lot"26 Blk 2 2.89Vail Vil lagel3th Fil ing
MDMF ZONE t.lITH ORDINANCE MDMF ZONE ALLOWED
RESTRICTION ON NUMBER UNITS
OF UNITS
60
l8 units/acre
130
ACREAGE
1. Sun Vail 4.92Lot 9. Blk 2,Potato Patch
88
68302. LionsridgeFiling 3
Parce'l B
48
32l5
17
26l6
PARCEL
7. Getty 0i1 Site 1.02
ACREAGE LDMF ZONE WITH ORDINANCE LDMF ZONE ALLOWED
RESTRICTI0N # 0F UNITS UNITS 9 units/acre
I
(2 units must be
employee units)
9
The total number of additional units for these ploperties if given MDMF zoningis-175 units. If each_propqlty were grantea a 2oz'aensiiv-.,ncrease over theexisting allowable (colirmn' 2),-there ilould be s5-iaJiiionll units.
.9Yf lits period-for this research does not a]low us to state that this list isar r-lnctusive of properties in this situation.
ENCUMBRANCE CHECK N0. 0-312
That according to the indicjes of the Eagle County, Colorado Clerk and
Recorder, rejative to the fol'l owing real property:
Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch, according to the recorded plat thereof,except Condomlnium Unjts 10, 7, L5, 12, and 3,770 Potato Patch Drive Condo-
miniums according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded December 23.- 1982jn Book 350 at Page 903 and as defined in the Condominium Declaration recorded
December 23, 1982 in Book 350 at Page 902, County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
B.
The record owner of said real property is:
Ed A. Smith, an individual
There are no mortgages or deeds of trust which purport
said real property, other thah the following:
to affect
locument recorded November 3, 1982 in Book 348 at Page 203.
Document recorded July 2 , 7982 in Book 342 at Page 457. n
C. There are no federa'l tax liens, abstracts of iudgment, or certificatesof state tax liens or any other liens which purport to affect said real
property, other than the following:
Document recorded February 3, 1984 in Book 377 at Page 766.,.
Document recorded February 3, 1984 in Book 377 at Page 765.,
Document recorded November 15, 1983 in Book 372 at paqe 872..
Document recorded March 7, 1983 in Book 354 at Page 553. -'
Jocument recorded July 14, 1983 jn Book 363 at Page 648./
Document recorded l{arch 22, 1983 jn Book 355 at Page 801.-
Document recorded March 7, 1983 in Book 354 at Page 553..
Dated: June 29, 1984
(The liabiljty of the Company is ljmited to the fee paid for this report)
&c&l ra ----. ---- --.r'ddl . .- I..
'l.c.DtlonNo.
Tl|tsl:tresfl rr:,[trd.(]"r Ist try,t \ovclnhcr.rr 8l r-rwc.ri VAII, il':Vf:5'nil:NiS e Dl:Vl-l,OI', L.ii'I,1:IITI'D II
*r,o..!rr.r\. l'. 0 't(x.),,h ril
lia 5', I e t', I ir rrt I rlr,i,,l ,,.,
t,.'l,,f lthrflrrtt,.rt .,ttr,. I',1i,,'[r,r.'.'.,tri',
r "on'),.! tla8ie r 'r, s(rtr , r,,t,,ri.l i,,'r\,.t '....,.',ti trr I, Srt^.rrrth
llrrlrNt:x';^s.,r,.,..r,,rjl. :.;,,i.i ;':7t.:,, .,
r r-' i L()l')lliN'I llj.ll:l) L.
\\Dq ttl_lit: \s lr,. rr,. I
| ,. , r:,tr r,rirf
\r^r llrll{}loxt. |, ",., .
, l(, I I I: il. )' l { .
.-..-Ia.o'd.r
2qry$'v"f'
toinrrnr PhilliF. trgrc Countv Clcfi f hcr{rt
0(u
PASTIei ! lrefrl'gZ
r.rl
BEST
IN{AGE>
POSSIBLE
\.. ra!^. |.. r';i',rr D,.r rnr.l
!, - ! f]:-!FT:.i.''*' -illqFrrrrF. .n!.'/ i,iailEf;l{4 f,' r.44r'q
m ||AVf A'|D m t)LD ihr .rr.. ..rath.r .ith rll .id rinarlrr rh. ,r,vrLtrt .nd rt9rrt.nrr,..i. tlrr.rito
L.b|rdif . b ttr.a :LtarlLf r, Th.t in ( r|. ol &fiult ,n r h. trti.nr ot rrd rht. o. rn, ,,f t h.rn. or rny ,rtt3L!..1, ct In th.,.'t itollh.rrt ?rr! th.r.on, -rcrdint to ih. t ror.ra rtL.t ol r{ l|(rt o?.nt o, th...
.? in lh. tata.trt 6laat ,. ro. on,iu|tb?tr.., prtn.lFl o. Int.rr.t, rt r.t, or ri ...I dra.ult rhall h. irrd. ln or tr .aaa.t tblat.r ot lr..ah tt.tt ot lh. l.rn.,.ondrtLar. .ov.rrnlr ot .fr....ni. h.rrrn .!nr.rrr{, r.li. t.rr. i.i..tL'.oiaLr .? ttr bart h.l.r ot ri. rra.bar{n6. -crr.d h.rrbt .r, &.t... . rtot.t|oo of .n, ot t. .ovr,t..rt.lr|rln a.aiaira xd aLal |. rat.ati,. |.L raoF t, 4.. aaL d.a arirrl r4h |rL, thrn, u9.rL lrh6t nd]kr otr|'h
.L.!b..r,lrb-.r{,ctraLrrlh!h...iat.ltCth...d'idF.!.rh..hriuFa''.rr9tol.!chnot|.,.t.}..lr..l
ara d....d,.. |.L.t|,'. cogt oI th. ..- td t 'r.ord.a Inrhr r.$rd.r'r offtc. ofIh..osnrr In rhrh.. d rrrtt.l.l. r..tlual.d. rt lh.ll.nd nrt b. lar?rl tor t.L t tttotth.r.ondtrrtto..ll.r.ld,it.polthr.ari.trnrnrr..otln-tr..Lg...tl.,ar.araPublEllt|aLar.tthinlt.t),rnaallth.riaht.trtl.rnd,Dltrrrtot.|tlt'.rt,r of
th. n.tl p.rl. i f g tFrtr or ||.ln. I h.?.|n, ra t{bli. .uctioh ra i l|.
Iroir .L.r o{ th. (!urt lloo.., |n Ea g 1e r'.u.tr.l ilag le
ot .'| ..L t .ni-r. 07 aat Fri il|.r.d, .r tr|t b. .F<rtird tn lh. noli.r o, rurh r.i.. f.,r l h. h'tt.rr .ntl b. t?r.tlL .ai. tlll lnrt i6 a..l, h.? ..ral.' ,{llr. n tr. h.rlnt b..n ,.rrtou.ly rt.. ot t h. t||n. ^nd !'lr.i of iu.} rrh,bt rat.tli....tl, t.allt, In r.a. ..rrt.Ir ot r..arrl .r?.ulrtron rt th. tr|r. t'rhlirh.d 'n ,.rd
Crriatcl EagledraX!a..iLatnirntan&taa.cnrh.a.t.tfh.fir.ttubli..aionthcrr'rt!or.i.,prrry ofIh. t'r.r,r.rr rath.
aaat..a h.a.rt alE. ||ta lo r.ah prrrn e1 p61. arl.aiia to hrv. x{r'r.d r rub..qu.^l ..ror{ Int.furt In
-{ tt.l .rt ta.t tb. a&.r jrr.n it all rioraad |n.lrri.trt, th.r. onl,' !h. couna} |nd .r.tr rr .|r.i r. th.
*r.. UFr ar.tr iaa|-a alall b. ..iLa t th. loui3t x.t, .nd to rrb .ad trv. to rhr Dur.h}.r ,. pur.hr.rr "1t*i t.Fttt d .sl -rb a...litk.L.r .rrtiti..L.In r?iu|f d.-riLrit ru.h ,.o,.rtt pur.h.x..r, .rd t||. .u'| rt
.r-r Fd rh.F .r. a.a lL ti.. vhro lh. turthr-r.r t r'thr..'t (o. oth.r Fr- .|rtrlLd t|r.r.tot rll b. .||trtHf. . atta ot d..a. th..rt t cnl..t lh. .. ." .h.tl t rta..a-a .. i. >"orld.a !t l.r; .ad ..'d Publ* Tt'r.!.. .h.ll.
rFr a.n.t It th. !1t. .r Fr..a. hoLina th. a..l (.rrrlt .t o? !r?!Ui.rarr ol po..h..., rh.h r.d d.m.n.l rr
..44.oroF.aarraal,th.,."-n..aii|.diora-at.ratort|LrroFnypsr.hrxd,.rthsIiri..u.hd..irndlr
-.4.. fha r,- ba rt-attr.r| h.yrnt.rri.ra.. a ara...(ui. to a!.h F?an or tr.rcir r a.a{ .r a( rdr ao i h. rrr.,
FrF rt Prr|r-at thLl !1d &.a ot -... .l|,ll b. 'ri th. .hlr.t?r t "|i ur | .orr.rrh... rnd .h.ll b. .rrb.d.
-lD.Lti -a aaaitrtaa It rl. r.ia trblr ltr.a- .. f..acr..D,l ihal! .r't.t ..4 qi.ta.Ltr to r!.h F.},n o?
Fr-.|. .aiitLa L l|.h H, .. f".nt ., tL ..rd tr.t r It
'|.|rrhr-a ^. .lor.rrid. .r.l all 3h. r!h1, trtl.. rnt.r?rt..Lrfit..1.tr|t,olr.a..tr$otih.F. y .ttl, tirt F.r. itr.h.[ ?.(tt th. arfr.? ru.. b? rh|.li tL .aid prrF.]t r.r -ld d|..h.tl rrLr r. ]h.,or.r ot r& h.r."r .,,nr l n.d..ta a. ih. .tL ct raLa i... bt vrrrs. th.rrot raa rr crr ol rt .xiarr..hl .t.u.h <.rtitLrl. ot ..rtr||.rlrr Dt
pu.ch.!. ,r In ..r. otth. ..d.dotd,n .l.sh pr{F.rr }, r ! ,!..9u.n! .o.uih..F... ru.|r .rrtrrn.rt ". .-,|.frp
l|on .hril .l.o L t.L?t.a ro In .trch d.cd or d..d.i lxrt th. notr(. !t..1. Dcrd mt b. -t o{l In .u.h &3d nll'idr. .r'ri
ah..rd Pubht tten ..h.ll, sut ot thr tto..rd..r .v.rlr ot.u.h ..l.,.tt t tlrrt t.trnl rnd rrtr'rrnr rll r...,.h.rF. .nd codr ol -.tht..,d ..L. p., t! rh. t r.tr.i.rt h.r.!.r.. or th. Ljrl lourr ot.r n'r, lh.
ttrn.r.l .|rd rht....a ar|. on..rd '|ot. ..co.atnf t th. !.ne. rnd.lr".r (hrr.ot...d rll |'o|rttrnlrhc.dbt
tt-h ldrt,c!.?,.t L|tl h.n.t.. .f ..rd iot to? tn.ur.na. r|r.r .rd .-...n|.hi. rrlb Inr.i?.i th.r.dn
.a ,.. cttl ,t.i.,rrr. r.nd.y'nf rh. ot.rplo.. It rnr,. rnto.hr ..rd 9r.! -V ot th. frrrt r.rt. . t 5l,t.lnt'r'..tratrlto. ot r..|.t|.: rh '.h .rL 'r .ab. l.d .rtl rL.d oi d-dr .o rr.a. .l.ll b. r F.t'.turl brr. Lah rr r.r .nJ
.trtlt, ..tr!.| li. rai.l t.rt y ot lh ,rrg p..t i tshr,rr or r..r;nr rrd rll olh.r ,..r.rnt clrrrn'nf th. rd
tt.,t ttt. ot rnt t.tt' th.no(. tI, l.on. thri,uflr or uia.r r]d trli l, of th. frr.t p.ra, ,rr rnt olrhtr ?h. holit.r or
hol&t. o;.r'd nor or nokr rlrt turrh... rrd prer.ry or.nt 1,|li !hrt.ol, rnl rt.6.ll rr,. h..ht[raory uton rhr
Pot.hr-r ot ,rrr.h.rt.. rt .h! ru.h r.L t^ .. t rn, rpplr.tron .f th. tu.(h., riohct lf. r.L|.. d..d b.
?.qurrd rar.|.t..dthraah.r.'! , .1r,*|l'r1t rt.iCs t..'?. o..r.rF.. rrl r.r lhr.rp..r- th.'a,t
ii.scla rn4r,,r its
1,, rrrl r'tr, Li I r!rt t'rrrt !lrhr '..t ril i/r'r
n, .r. ,,.t | 4!.,,! \ Il,.! i,'rr,.,rr l: i:t
rr,!.i ,r,! ,, iI I .,r ,,*t r, r!|l),,r \ t,, rr
Li
'1, !. i.,,,,1..rt,,.{.rh r.ni,r ri',t, r r, "..r }1,, n.ir....l }:i, r,l,i,,,n r.,|,'r .i, ,al,r,!r' .r',,tr' .,,,1 r,r
i.i s I rqr !t,ii{, rL,ii.,i
rn{ S:... t. t'o!,rrdo
r.opy of thr.h nor|.r
br?r.rd.r.|.n. th...rh ..d
'\.r .r 't,r rt,.? ,t
.r,'l rh. rl. . I r t. n..l t,r!,r{ rr, r' ' . ' rnd t! r,.,.'
.."1 I rir ', I' I 1 r.i I
li,tlLr,ir!,|t .,i ,_ rr rr.! I t.,, rfrt.f.
\\t lti\t t\, \\r "r \\r ,,r r , | .l
t\l
t, ,tt"
.-'tr l ltodarl.
'i'rr,on fr?|ri AgrI 13, rqt
. . - . ltLtr 5t-s!{a..-trrrrvt &tr- p' ' : I r'.rl
tJ/)t A, t tr -l 71 /.I'}IJLL <A '-1\ ' -/'{llt-^-| '.l
. i l .. i
' r.r,r-l
,'l I -tJ, ' ril . .ril(r'l(,'l I -tJ, ' ril . .ril(r'l(
, r': ( , i' l,()^
I .{i, , , jt,r.t tt t\ r;
r' :( l-,rr t.l t)_ I (
rdr.I! att
h. ll.0Qa
(Oonatruo ruatt
tllltll r lorrortr haa .r.cut.d . Con.ttuctlon lprn Ag!e.-
Psaacalblng oartaln rtghC. .nd oblltallon. of th. P.ttt.rt
llltllt r Otrntor 6olirrr to ..cur. th. ProrPt P.Yr.nL ofth. laosoEalal tndabtadnaaa, tha raPlyrant of rny .dv.nc.i r.d.gusrurnt to thla Urad o! lrua!, th. prrtorrrtrr ot che obltg.-
Llon oonlrlnod ln !h. Conrtructlon L.n l|s..rnt .nd rll oth.r
coyaDanca atrd obllg.tlona of tha Eorror.t to t'h. E.naticlrry.
lIlffb e-ct
tlft tDaMrlt ..a. crtf. y' 6.y o! Jun., l9!2' by rndb.ti.n YllL tnttrrtrt rro Dttrlutilglf ttr e g.n.rrl p.rtn.r-
ahlg, rio.. latr.r.l PattLta a3a John lho... Con.tructlon Cor-
,oratloo, a (blotrdo corgosatlonr rnd lltoaaa Dav.loFant corPo-lrtton, a Cololrdo corgoiat lon, ,hoaa rddraar l. P.o. lor 696rY.ll, Colotado ala3l (hatalnalt.s rtlorrelt to .t '!orroratr).nd ld A. lrlth rho.. lddt..r l. 400 Uourton lrt'rr.:' C..lutldl||g. Fuaton, llrra 7?002 (h.ratnrttar r.l.lrad to .t
'Crrntot') ' .nd lll lolLtc tlu8llA Ol lll Ol,ltf Of lAGLl,tftla Ot @IOllD lhas.laalt.r rototrrd lo ra 'lru.t..').
f I llllSS ltH t
r|tlftl, losrorar h.a aracutad ona c.rt.ln Prorl.rorytotar ilat.d o! rvrn data haraol, aad. gayrbh co th. ordar of
f t LYllID SlVtlC, frD tl)tl lltOCtAlIOx lh.t.ln.ft.r r.t.(r.d toaa 'latrftolary') .t lta oftla. at 65t trordrty, D.nval,
Colotado l020tr or .t ruch olbar Pl.c. .a th. hold.r th.r.o(r.t d..tgn '.. ln rrt!lt||. t|^3 th. Prtnctg.l rur of alghLllllton hxl F/100 Dollrr. (11,000,000.00) rlth lnt.r..t
lharaon aa proyldad ln a.ld Prorl..ory iot. rnd hrvlng I
r.turltv rtrtr o! ''.ctbc b, 19t3, unl..r .rt.nd.d to nocletor t-hrn Junc tfr lgll r rnll-
INC.nd
l(X ' tllltl|oll r ln conrld.rrtion of lrngood .nd valu.bl. conald.r.tlon .nd lo! th.arld. os.ntos h.t.by grtnt., barg.lnr, ..lIatrualaa ln truag loravar th. t.al pro9.rty
dercr lbd err
Doll.rt rnd oth.rth. purpoaa ! for.-and convay3 untoaora Pa rt icul!rly
A. P.r trhtblt A rhtch l. .Ct.ch.dh.rato and lncorposal.d h.teln,
rnd all of Crrntorr. rlEht. tltl. .nd lnt.r..t th.raln.
fita tndantura lrElud.a all b'rlldlnga, .truccu!ar tndlqrlorarnta t|or or haraaltar glrcad tharaon end rll tlrturaa,aqultrnt, qrllarEaa aad lusnlahliga noy or h.taattar .tt.chatl!h.rato, .nd .ll th. rl9ht. (tlEludlrrg u.t.r rlght.), Par.lt.,haradllDnta and a9$r rtairrFa. th.r.to b.long ltrg or ln eny rey
{,Fs!.lnlt|r, tot.th.r rtth .i:/ rttor-rcqulrrd proP.rtylnt s.at tn lla .bora-o.acrtbad ta.l ..t.t. ,htch Glrntor rry
aC any llra haraaltar hava ot acqul3., .trd .lro .ll ot thatanta. laalrar ollrr 9to!t!a rnd ltrre of tha abova-d.acllb.draal aatata ara aorCga{ad grogatty lror nov untll th. dabt
.acu sad ba3.bt l. g.ld ln lull. tIl ol th. rbov.-d.tcrlb.d9toF33t (rbCh.s r..l os 9.r.oo.ll t. r.l.rr.d to bel'or r. th.Itcat|td t3oo.sty'.
to l|.vo al|d !o iotd tha aar, tog.thar Ylth .ll the
trltllalaa .ad ltlrSanarEaa thataunlo b.Ionglngr In truttranrrtblaaa. la ca.. ol 6alault bti lortouar or Gr.ntor har.-
unda3, !b.a ut)on notlca .nd dar.nd ln erltlng ttlod Ylthtruag.a co tor-lor fhta D..d ot tru.t, .r|d to 3.ll and dll-
to.. ol th. tcstgaead ?roFrty (or .ny g.rt th.s.of r! .ry b.
,r-"rm
Ctanlor hataDt rtrra[ta tltla to.rc.pt th. D.ralttod taoulbrlrE.r ..att.chad har.to and lncorlrcsrtad h.s.tn.
I.
rnt. ofilt garrlt,tad ln ruch proataaory
2. ?_ z. - pavranr of 6aroaa. !o gayarrd Dato3a Fnrlty attaohaa all Erou,
3.forr rlI
C lon ta.n
a.
,lth coprnlai
d..lt .!.a lr i!. rt La .t .d ..f., d .ll tL rlflt, tftl..id lnc.3o.t ot (kdcr- thr.l; tJ dr rdr .. rry :hi b.?l:!ltf !u F, .., !o ror,- iirrci-irJ-Errrl rrj olllirr-c.E. ol 9rr3orr.-, !3r.ta.r. aaaa ot oartlllcata o! rcrfrqt f -!ll_!-.-_tl.n rrt l? grov_ttrd t r|r.- ltr*; .i.ll, q|t oi ir9rar.L. ot rrrllr oQ .rEi - Ll,a, rtttr f trrt ' p1lnl- -iIr.t.tnlr! .ll 1o.., oh.ttl.., tf coitr-of -bffne mfC'tiir i,S1|:i!llt!..tlr torte.-d !1.?..rr, rr -ittoi,rry.r llil -ir
l:r.rr Drorl.rldr p.l t. Lnatolary t||.
-it
ot -.uoh lid.b!-.<trr.., .i.t .lI rrvr dvrer{ !l- frnrtlotrry for rii p"re"i..ulhorlrd rrtrra o-r - ry rrr rrir- -IiiiiJii rh.r.on .r rh.dofrult, r.r. provl. I !o; ln ur trafa-t -loto, roraosltr th.or.rpru.,- lt . .ny, grortdrd br nrroerir rri. - -iii-Jii. -oi..ral .rE aatd d.. or daaaa ro trdr aiall Da a lrqratu.l bar,TIT-ll-r:: .S .qult., .t.ln.t or.ntot ena ril'oiflii-prtroii:l!t.llg rr! ^rorr-t.c.u troF.ay o! .ny 9.sr h.r.o! uv, lrc,BDsoue|| ot iriC.r Or.ntor. ttra l.t.I noUir ot thr I nde-jtodne r iTI.?urcl.:. th..ro3tt.f.d rrogorty or .nt/ prrr tnrroofi-iJj-I[aoall not b oblltatort qron lha gurctrrroi or gurcherrr rt env.ucn aata to aa. t,o tha. alrtrllcat.ton ol th. gurchaaa FnaI. Il:|-..1!!r d..q l. -roqulrcd, Or.ntor h.r.by- .e!... to piy efltha arFnraa tharaof.
th. lortg.g.d Prog.lty,..t forth on trhlbtt !
Crantos and lo!rorar harabt turthar coyanant, rcknorLa4gaand €raa t
l. 3!S!l!glEgt. tt.t Dorror.r ylll pry rh. prlncl-p.^ or atlc rna tntatart on th. lndabtadn.aa arldancad b,y th.by th.Pro.l..o!y ror. ..cur.d h.r.by .t th. tlr rnd ln tr.o j.ni-ipro"ldad thas.ln rnd to perlorr aerry othar rgr.axnt contaln.d!n luch tro.l..or!r tot.. trlvll.t. lr rorcrvjd to .et. pr.9.y-othar rgr.axnt conta ln.d
lota.
and dlachrrga rh.n dutall ground santa, tararr ltrlrr-
co.nrtsuctton Lpan AaraaLnt.oorlg.ttont.nd 9ay rll rurrAgraarant batraan tha gart iar,
lnayr.nc.. lo contlnuoualy r.lnrrln hrrrrd, lt.btl-it, rortfrFd6rge imtlon lnrurrlr, uutrorr'r lirk rndotn.s lnrurarEr, of luch typ. os typer ena trountr r! !.n.!lcl-ary ray lroa tl.. to tlr rroulri on th. lroraorrrnrr n^s .r'fry rfy lro. tl.. to ttr rrqulrc on th. lqrroeaxntr not orharaaltat glacad on rrld rrrl DloDarty. tnd ?o Drv D?dDrlvh.r..lt.r gl.c.d on mld s..I grop.rtt?, .nd- to p.y prorgtlyyh.n du. .ny ps.rlur. Lh.r.!or. AII lniurrnct rtrrtt -ur- crritoit,lth c.oprnlaa -.9ptovtd by lanallcl.ry .nd th. pollcl.a rndr.n.r.la thar.ol {os castlflcata aatlrlactory to !ana!icl.ry)ry)
aancr, rttar ranta and othat gogalnnntal or runlclptl charqaa,lln.. .nd lTo.trlon. lrvhd ripon tm roitgegra i;d.rrt-.;d-i;
!:!':{'tl{ l:llv.-r th. olf lcl.l s.c.lpr. Gh.r.for to !.n.!rc.ry,Proylda<l that Gr.ntor naad not pay rny .uch aDunt ro long irth., v.Ildlty th.s.o( l. b.trE contrrtrb tn good lrlth rnd iro-vl.lon lor th. 9.y-nt h.r.o! l! ..d. by cientor ln e mnne r..tl.f.ctory to Ln l lc lrsy.
that Borrorar rttl p.r-due under th. Conrt ruc-
rhrll bt h.ld by lrnrtlclrry .nd h.v. .tt.ch.d th.s.to e rte;ld.rd rortg.g.. claua. tn lrvos of end ln tosa accagtabta toErnetlclrry. tn .v.n! o! to.. Cr.ntor y.ll glva l-.dl.t.noBlc.-by ..ll to !.n.tlct.ry, rho .ry ..1. prdo! of lorr tinot r.d. prorgtly by Cr.ntos. lrch lniurtrrco to4rny conc.rn.dl. h.r.oy ruthorlr.d .nd dl!.ct.d to r.l. g.y..nt loi ruch lotr9il.c!fy !o D.n.(tclrry ln.r.rd of to GrinCor rnd lrnrtleleryJolnLly. Th. lnrur.nc. groc..d., or .ny p.rt t,har.of , rry Oi.ppl,l.d by t.n.trctrry .t lt3 optlon eo ihr rtductlon o! th.
2.
tndabtadnaaa horabf aaocsaa, or to tha r.ator.tlon or r.p.lr ottha Dro?alty dllrd, o3 ralaaaad to oranlor to r.l. th. n.ca.-..rv r.t)alra os laatoaallon.
t. F lrata. lhat Or.nlos at[ll not co-lt or lrt.ltf..t. rnd ffillT:litntrln th. tortlq.d ?ro9. rty ln good irpr I rand condttlon. raaaonabla uaar al|d taar .rcagt.d. on rnylrllur. ro to aalnttlr, aatrtlclary, .t lta ogtlon, .ry c.u..ra.aonrDh tlntrnrncr rr|d rrprlruork to br prrlonod .t th.coat of osantor.
6. Et!t!E_P!!rb. tlr.t rll ,udgr.nt., d.cr... .nd,rrrrnt,. to3 lntury or ll.r.g. to tb. lortgrg.d trog.rty .nd tIIar.rda gurau.nt to psocaadlrta tor condunet lon or under gorr rof arlnaac dcaln .sa haraly ..alg6ad to !.nattchry by Cs.ntorlo th.ls .ntlraty ara .halt Da pald to !.n tlct.ry rho, .t ll.o9tlon, xy €lt lha raD to th. r.dtFtlon ol th. lnd.bl.dn...locurod haralt. or to tha Saator.tloa or rrgrtr ol th. groparly6ara{.d, or ralaaaa mld payrnt to Or.ntor to rat. th. n.c.a-.rry raatosttlon ot rag.lta. lrno(lchry t. h.B.by rryororod,ln tb. n.x ol Cs.ntor, to r.c.lra .nd 9lv. .cgultt.nc. to- orto .plr.l fra .ny ruch rrard, Judgrnt or dccr.. rh.th.r lc b.Jolnt ol ..eatll.
7. - otha! Llana. llr.t osrntor rlll p.y rh.n du.lna!.btadnaaa rhlch ray b. ..curad by ltan or ch.rg. ontortg.g.d tsog.rty or .ny p.rt th.s.ot or lnt.r..t th.r.tn,upon raqrrac arhtbli' a.tlalactoy .vlll.nc. to Ln.tlclrry o!dlach.r9a of ar|y auch Ilan or ch.rl..
f. llcht to In|D.cg. lh.t Lmflcl.ry l. h.r.by glv.nth. rlght of antry on tha tostg.ead Prolrrty rt.ny r...on.bl.tl.. tor tha t)o39o.. ot lnlr.€tlrq .rld grogrrty.
9. CDltaca rtth @yarrf,ntal Lculdt ionr. Thrt
GrrnBor rtll oolrlt rllh all tha lara, .€tr. rul.a, r.gul.tlonr
anyth..ndth.
a9u tat ronl
9 t.l.t I v.,.od ota.3a ot any tad.sal. at.ta. runlclprl, l.9t.l.tlv.,adrlnlatsaelra or ludlclrl body. cnlrrton os offlca aras-adrlnlatsaclra or ,udlclrl body, corlrrton os offlca aras-claltrg anI pof.r of lagulatlon or augarvialon ovar Gtrntot or
Cha tottgalad trotasty lo3 tba conalructlon, uaa os op.r.tlontharaol , grottdad, horaga r, that Crant,or aay contart any auchlarr lot, rula, ragulaglon or oldar ln any raaaonablG rannaruhtch rlll not .tt.ct th. lnt.r..t ol trnrflclrry lo.ny prrtof th. loltg.t.d Pro?.!ty.
10. hlloraanc. of Dalaultad Cov.n.nt.. l||rt lrnrllcier,.ryr rt lt. o?tlon, ovrh rltor ilolrult by cr.ntos .nd Borrou.ro3 .ttar raturtty ot th. t||dabtadnaaa a.cu!.d hrrrtsyr .rk. .nygayrnt or grrton rny dataultad coyan.nt, rgr..rnt or .ct olCrantor or lorsoras hasaunda! or under any oth.r .9r..rantarocurlrtr rrldrlrclng or lalatlng to t,h. lnd.bt.dn..r t.cur.dhatabt, r|rd aay lonlaa adearEad !y Lnat icl.ry f or auch purpo...h.Il b..s lnt.s..t .t th. d.l.ult r.t. provld.d lor ln ..ldlot. .nd .hall thalaugon b.coa. . p.rt of th. ind.br.dn...aacusad harabt (.ean lf ln .rc..a ol th. f.c. ..ount of th..bota-daactlOad Prorlaaory ioLa) and ahrll b. i-.dl.t.ly dJe.rd p.!.b!. rlthout not tc..
fl. tavrnt ol afnallcla(y'a kDana.a. Thrt crantor .ndlorrorar .gtaat to and ulll grolrtly p.y .ll co.ta, ch.rg"! rn(larFnaaa ltlutlad by Lnallcl.ry. inc ludtng r.r.on.bl.attotnayra taaa atl.lng out oC o! ln conn.ction eith rnyactlon, procaadl||| or haarlne, ln any ury .ff.cting or rcl.rt-lng3o tl|. lort9.lad trog.rty, th. .bovr-d..c(ib.d Pro.l.rory Nor.,lhla Daaal of ?ruat, t,h. @natruction [o.n Agr.a..nt or rnyothat a|raarnl aacurlnl, rvldrncing or r.lating to thc tnlGbt-adnaaa raculad nalaoy.
i.
qrF -F:
13. Conthl. D..d oa lruat -
12. Dl.rlta. ir.t, la ur ar.n! oll
lll c.f.ull ln th. tlDlt t trDrt ot tlr. l*lt.a-n... .aour.d harabt, or .ay Dat! tbroot I
(b) br..oi os rtol.tlo !' lorror.r ol th. oblll.-tlona ol tha Co6a33rFtlon Lan 6rO at I
(c) b3fah or rlohtlcn bt O3artor or loaro-r otany ol tha co'rattanta or ao3rr-nta contalaaa herolnl
(d) br.Eh or rlolrtloi !t Ot.nCor ot rny ol th.cov.nan!. or agro-nt. ooitalrad ln .nt othar doournl..curlDl, .vld.|Flrt o! r.l.!lq to th. l'd.bt.dn .. aacur.dh.r.by (unl.r ourrd rlthln rny {tlla.bl. gr.o. p.!lod) r or
(.) dctrult tn th. g4rDnt ol .nt oth.r lad.ltadn...tro. lorronr to a.!ralalratr or .|rt p.rt th.root,
!!. ,iol. ot th. lta.bc.drr.. ..oo!.at b.!.by .nd th. lnt.r.attharaoo rat at orEo r rt tha o?tloa ol fmtlclary, ba aaal.r.ddu. .d p.ti.bl., d th. lo.tgqod trogortt b. .oL ln th.r.oa.r .d rtth tb .- rtlrot .r tt th. 1r6.bi,.{r.. h.l..tr3d d r.ratoad uat td alta3 r.!url!t. lt tor.sloora l.rada !t lrrataa, a saaaonabla attorrrya' tor tor rtrloaa tnth. .uat rrlalon oC arFh lorrclorurc Daocadfu||a ahall ba.lld rnd dd.d bt lrr.taa r. a D.r! ot th. co.t ol torrolo-aur.. tQ, totaoloaor. ba !t Etlon of coult. rarlon.bl..ttorn tr' t..r rhttl b. tu.d bt7 th. oo0?t r! . palt ol th.coat ol rrEh toraclorura grooaadl{a. Atl aoch atlortrtra ?aa.(ra |.ll .a tha coala, chaslo. ar||l arFi..a ralarrad to ln ttra9s.c.dln9 p.t.er.9b) .lr.ll !. .rd b.co- r p.rt ot th. trd.bt-.dn... aaccr.d iatabt ntablt/ lDd on I g.slty rlth othar
r nd.bt.dnaa. rocurtd tharabt.
.ny .odlticatlon, toatgotiia-lt3, artanalon or rarrral ol that tr. ot t!.yrnt of th. tndabcadraa or .ntr part tharaot ..cu s.dh.s.by. Ln ltct.ry l. h.s.bt .ubrog.E.d to th. llrn ot rnyrortgaga, dord ol Croat or othaa ltan dlrchrrgodr ltt r{|o la orln 9.rt, by th. proc..da ot th. loan r.cus.d h.s.!t.
I{. lleht to tnqa!!! tool L9.!v!I. t'h.t, ln crra otd.l.ult, rh.rabt tha slghr of lorrclorurr occura haraurrdar,Ln.flct.rtf , or tha holdrr of th. c.rtlllc.t. ol gurciaaa,ah.ll rt onc. bacoD aatlrlad to th. goaaaaalon, uaa rnd oalot-aant ol th. Iortgaiaal trogasty, aid to tha sant!, ltauaa a||dgrofit. th.r.ot. lro. tha rccrulng ol ]rh rlghta .||a durl|r{th. t.nd.rEy ot to!.cloausa grca.dlnta .rrd tb. Ftlod ols.d.qrtion, lt rny. luch goaaaaalon, uaa, anro!2xnt, tanta.r..uaa .nd p3ofrt. .h.ll at orica ba d.llyarad to Lnaflcl.sy orth. hol,d.r ot lh. c.rtillcata of purchaaa on raquat. Onrrfurrl, ch. d.Ilv.ry ol .uch poaaaarlon |r.t b. .ntorod by th.p.rty .ntl!I.d !hasato by .ny .ggrogrl.ta clvll .ult or 9:o-crrdtrqr, rnd auch g.rliy ahall ba .ntttlad to a raoalvar torth. rlostgar.d Proparty, and ol th. r.nta, laauaa at|d gtollCathrr.ot, aftar .ny auci d.l.ult, IncludltE rh. tlaa coratad btlor.clo.ure proc..dlng. .nd th. p.stod ot ladafllon' tf rny.Euch .ntltl.-nt .h.ll .ri.t r. . r.tt.r ot rllht rlthootr.gard to lh. aolyancy or inaolv.ncy ot lha Grantor or tha thanornrr of lh. lortg.tad Progastt rnd rlthoot ragard to r,ha ada-quacy of th. .acurt!y tos th. lnd.btadnaaa racuaad hasalt.tuch roc.ly.r ..y ba .ggolnc.d bt .nt court of o{Ftait turt.-dlction 'rpoa .r p.rta appllo.tlon, nottc. th.s.ot bal|r| h.a.btargr.aaly rrlvrdr arrd tha aapolntxnt of rny ruch alcelvar, onony ruch .pplrc.tlon flth os rlthout noClc., l. haralt con-,:.nt.d to. All ranta, laruar and proflta, I ncoro rnd ratanua
a.
ot th. lott t d tlotartt .h.ll b. .9pll.d by .uch r"c.lv.(saorillng lo tha lar and tha orltara .nd dlr.ctlon. of th. court.
lt. hataad la-t lon I Lsaialll r ot t..rr. th.totan3or ahall iot hara not aaaatt ant rlght unila3 any rtatrrt.or lola of lao Frtrlnlt|l to th. a.sahaltlng or ..par.t. r.l.of orantoSra raaat., trFhal|tg t,h. loltg€.d Prop.tty, ot toth. araq)Cloa ot lxDalaad or otha3 .ro?t lon und.r .nd Uyylrtua ol rny I.u oa Ch tt.t. ot Colot.do no, .rl.tlng or yhlchra, haraaacar ba gaar.d ln r.l.tlon thar.to. !.n.llcl.ry .h.11haea tha rtglrt to Lia. p.rltal r.la.a. or r.lar... of th.to!tt.f.6 'lo?arty rqlaa.bla to Lnallcl.sy rtthout notlc. to,or tha cottttnt r aplrroyal or agraaaant of otharr ln lntar.rt,,hlch partlal rrtltlr or r.1..... .h.ll not tn.lr in .ny..ntrs tha v.lldity ol or pltorlty ol thla D..d ot lru.t on thGa.curttt ra.alnlnt, no! !a1.... tha par.onrl tl.btltty oflotrorar tor rrgryrnt ol tha lndabtrdnrrr rrcurcit h.r.bry.
15. lo ooyavtnca ol lncuabsanca. Ti.t if th. io(tg.gadtrogarttf, ot any pall tharaot, l. aold, conv.y.d, tr.nrf.rr.d,Iaaaad, alEt$ar.d, rrtr.gad or gl.dg.d to.ny oth.r g.r.on oranglty, tir. .ntlr. lndabladn.aa aacurad har.by rh.Il b.cooetDdtataly dur end g.yabla. .t !an.flclr!vrr optlon, unl.r.9rlorutlttan conaanL tot auch ral., convaylnca, tr.nafar,lataa, attcutbtarEa, a.rrtg.ga or pladg. hrr baan obt.tncd fronLn.tlcl.ry.
I?. lo ,rlvar ot lanatlcirrv, Tift no t.llur. by Ban.fr-clary to .nalat upon tha attlct Srrtorrencr of lny covc4!nt,agraa-nt, tara or corrdltion of thlt Da.d of Tru.t or th. Pror-laaortt lota tlcurod har.by or to rrarclra anv optlon, rlght ortardt asltl||g on account of rny b3a.ch tharaof ahall eonrtr-tuta a ralws of any auch bt..ch or of auch covanant, rgre.-rnl, tata ot coatdltlon. tlo coranant, rgraarnt, tcre or con-dlllon ln tbla Daad of Tru.t or th. piorirrory Notc rccuredhasaby to ba garcortad or corpliad ulth by Cr.ntor or 8o(rorrr,and no braach tharaol, rhall ba raiv.d, .lt.r.d or .odlfladarct'lt by r,rltlan lnatrurnt .racuead by Banaflcirry. ||oyrlv.s ol .ny br..ch lhrll aff.ct or.lL.r inie Ocrd of truit,
br^l t aach and avary coganant, agraaaant, t.rr .nd condltion ofthla Daad of Tluat and tha Prori.lory tlota aacurcd harcby rhrllcontlnu. in lull lo!c. .nd aflact, ,l!h r..pact to any othclthan .rl.tlrrg or rubaaqu.nt bra.ch th.r.of.
It. Curulat,lva nlqhta. that ..ch riqht rnd rar.,ty ,)firnrE.c.r.ffi Enrs Daao ot Truat intlt Da cutulr-tlv. and .hall b. tn additlon to av.ry olhcr rlght Dr r.ncdy
Itrogrdad lor ln thla Daad ol Truat or not or i,sr.af trr cxrstingat lau, ot ln aqulty, or by ataruta or otharria.. Th. cxerclr.or battnnlng of tha ararctaa by !.naflcirry of rny on. or [oreot tha stghta or ratadla. provld.d for in ttit D..4 of Tru.t,or nor or haraaltar arlatlng rt l.r, or ln .qulty, or byatllut,. ot otharulaa rhall not pr.cludc th. strul,trn.ous orlalar ararclaa by Lna!tclary o! rny or aII oth.r rightr ortatdlaa psovldad for ln thla D..d ot Trurt, o! nor or h.r!-.ltar .rlrilng at 1,.r, ln rqutty, or by atrtut. or oth.rrl...
I9. latogga I gtatarnt. that Gr.ntor tnd Borrotrer,rtttrln rtr-il-ryr rlEiilEii-Itc i I ry | . r.qu.rr, ytlt furnish rn.ccurata rllttan, atalarant, duly aclnouladgad, to E.nafrcieryot to rny progoa.d r.al9n.. ot thl. D..d ol Trurt rtrring thta.ount ol prltElg.l and lnt.r.rt thrn oving on thc .bovr.-de-.clibad Droalaaory tota and ala.cslblng any offa.t. or rle fcnrcrrhtch ray than ari?: lgrlnat tha lndabtadna.. racur.d hc!.by.
20. llqhta Undar Oth.r Asraa.antr. Thrt it th. indobtcd-naal aacurad il!'r.by or any Othar Indabt.dnat! cf Borror.r tolanallclary tt nor or harattt.r furth.r racu!.d by rny othar
t.
.f t..rit ot .nt rat.ra rliaa.fas trhlbs ta.|al.l[ 3a rrl:: rl?1n|t trog..ltl .- tr3. .rt.r. .q, irtrrt I; -d.;cr ro?3crr r-.r rb trorl.lq|. .t rU. Laa - ffrt-or -ii.tt .rFt rt..-rir, L-3Ll|3t rt, !! tf|'f ti, orej.c.-.4;1;--o1 ?!. gr rt.i .fr.(rrrrl lr- rtl .. til. d.a- aa-tr-:.rr.r.: ^cofrrriontlt or t a-goalrot l, a- li .rcl rrlrr tt- -irt. aG.3.rn . ..'.t ..lr {tlt rb ,3aoa-. ?calJd tblotroa.f .in.t .uci rnd.tt.ar.a^- -rtrrrost
- ..lrl, ;i - iit-orti--iiI.t.tu. ol .fit br.Eh or a.t.utt or - rrl -oiDr rtlttt ;-f;;,i.tt r cont.ln d har.ln os .rarclaad hfrorrtr or ,l|.tbt- oorr-trln.d ln or r:e rcl.cd diaat an, ctf r rrrh qt..-nt.
I- I$; .'.5{HrH#1, T.T .",'.ffiT,.".,lit,,ii''::',ili: ianalt l]Elqi. tia oitrs .. ttf ta.ittifcrtton of Os..tot3.qulr.., .ra rh.t tL t.3. .|.,.ltola3r. .h.lI I rr tudr iavauDa.{rint lpldor of tha lraab,t.ar .. reon rod h.(.!?, t.rrrt i'tritral.a ol ttro paragialrr rraroot .ra !o3 riilirncr Durroa.! onry.nc {o noB ooiatltuta past of thla Daad of truat.
11.,t'", ."ffi: .gi;t,*t .';',LT L":l;Fraon ot c l3ctxta,roa ahall, to roy eltrnt, be tnvrlld, orrnl!9.::!ot: or tn{?llo.bl., rh. rnt'naoi oi-ir.f. ooort or'ttJiC.or tn ar9ltc.tlon ol arrch t.r. or grOrlllon to parrona ot Clr-cu..t.mal oth.r th.n tho.. .. to- rtrlch lt lj h.ld tarriic,
::ll?r1o-bl. gr lnlgltcrbt. .h.ll ,rot or riirctoo rh.r.ur, r;..cn r.tl .-,xt proylalon of thla Daad of ?su.t ai.ll b.- u.ltd.no antoic.d to tha tuli.at .rtant par.lttad by l.r.
lt. tt- of lt..tEa. tt.t tt- ta ot th. ara.tra h.r.of.
-24. - Lnatli. lhat tlta con|'|anta cont.tn.rd h.a.ln .tull
..lalnlrtt.!or., 3rrcc.aaora rnd errtinr ol Cr.ntot, forroii.Truataa and Lnaa lc l,ary .
-
" " n ji ;.,.. ffi 'Jtil*li ".fl il *'.',."' 5:ifi li, "i. o Itr.o Color.do Unrfos. Cor.sctal @6., to tha artant tiat ttr.curaa an obllgatlon Incorrad Cot lha conatsoctton o? endrrProv.a.nl on th. lortgagad prop.sty, trcludtq ..ha acqutal-tlon co.t ot th. |1ortgaged lroporty.
,n,.iiio .ffii*5* . r,T*,,"":'...*'"T:i:,, l:frIrd rr a 'ti,rtura frtrng. pirr.u.nt to tr-ct ton ,-aortal of !hacolor.do uniforr (:o.r.rctrl cod., -ftth rrir.ct to tha rollorrngtyp.r of goodr unrch .r. or rlll oc !lrluror raltlad to t16t|ort9.9ad propcrry I Atl -D.btor,. 9.r.on.lty, ttrtu-r, r99ii_rnc.t, arrpata, dr.p.r. lurnlturr, rqutpnt rnd ,:onttruiilonLta([rlr, rll D.btor,r .caountr rnd -goirrrr t lnt.nrlbtaa, atrd.tt rrghtr o! D.bror rrrh r.3p.ct to piror rna rgrcll lotitoi-,,.lGr r.pr, rrr.( t.pr tndtor ottitty rloooritr, tnd triranaua.lr and repl.caranta thataof and atl- rrtlchr In aubatltu-t ton t hcrrfor.
Por tnc putpoeGs ut t,rrt paragrrph, G!anlot and torrotat atatn. D.bcor, .nr. Banrt rcirry tr tha llacurad Datty,
brnd. and thatnuta to tha
21 . LarIr.l R.Iaaaaa,Itgrgrd Frogrriy r e ld.dtnara la no dalault ha(aundar.cntrtlad to prrtrrl r.la.a.a ot
b.n.llt. .rrd .drant.taa oontalnad i.s.ln, ahallbanallt oa tia raqrac!lra holrl. aracuto3r,
ra.ntlcltat.d that tha t|ort -rnto torlhoua. untta. trovl,dadcr.ntor and !orsoras ah.ll bclndlvtdual unlga upon p.y-ntof not !.sr Lnrn 70t o( rn. .ppr.laad valu. o! tho-unlt io borel.r..d. .r ,l.tor.rnrd oy lrnittcirry lnd ugon gayraat o! thaLrl,?4rc lrra r,r pro\.drrl in th. Conat(uctlon tofn Aq(t.fnt.
6.
,-.1i- ;..3i'i.$lli":l'!.
ra .flltl- r. a- dlt SaUa,t-L --l tb t.rr ot th. -o'r-a-r"lb.'l tli--f l-. Ln aU ?l| t htta!.rt I .r .{u.t to ch.
Itd r-t n b, It Q. tln tcdJ lL ttll 5t Lce ar. L
F ilr r .U FU.t- d fE ..tJd It trtrel.tr tl||. !.r.. rd
i.cl.l ma. * rh - 3t Istaaa hcf.rt' (.ll .. ..tlrt.d btbtkr.rt) L. .ll r .h.i Fia lb!.to3 ltvtlrl b7 tL rt-.r ot
DtL to rtl- )rlor lrt -8 FLE tc tb a.t. ri6 .*b Srortd r.rt. 'lr-.. td-i tc d
-ert.
tllt Lc- lltqtmt. ..td .rr
tc D. bL t' btfct-t 3. tt .da arna Lt., tr.errc. Pr-15' t.r.r
ra ,r-t. blft rfr a- L- -l1.i5t. lr lclaft|| rlEh p.tratr 'Lllclart -alt -t f. U^-L tc lL ot-lor tat trt.r..t or olh.t ccQ.o-..tl(l. -a - tFt -atl -E L h.l. tl trr.t |tra sy b. .hll.d rtthbr.ftct ttr. l-'|l t--. ll bllctcT a.t.rrtr.r tb.t th. Dlthlt p.t-
."!t. t ll l' Cr-br tc hattaf.t fot ar.ra Lttr, l!.utJrc. Proltr'tr.. -a mt r-t tll, ?qt '| *.ll .ot br rutflchnt to prya- t- - d ttaL, oaltot -atl, atta" tdttr lottc. 3h.r.ot. 6dtoa.tLr uttl t|. r-t rb Ealtt bt.llrtr pry to lr ltclrry rny -unlrc....rt to raa I tb tttcl*t rtlclp.t.a bt Lrtlcl.rt.
f9. tdJ-blt. lrt- l?r.f.r ol tL trt.?tt tro Gr.lior lo lor-rc.r. alcl tidl;ar -.ll t-. tL ton ot 6. a.ltirt ot r d..d frcCrrtfi to Lrrrr It l-a tttl., .acrq .|fnt , to rh. Lal. Cor.tt Cl.rl
d lc.'tr to? rtotai{ -d tb r.cordt{ tLtd Cr-tor rhrll b. rr-lre..l frl rt t-tLr olulat loo or ll.Dlllat -aar th. d..d ot ?rurt.
ld A. LttLr tntt..,rd
gAtL IlvlTIET AID DTTII'?ET IIr Golondo l.rral Dart!.rthlP
ll: Jo[ Tru CCt'rUCrIoi colPor^Tlotr.
a Colotado corporrtton, le!.rrl part-
trr
IYArlItT I
flr TIO;ll DWILOI!€IT COIPOI TIoiI, .
Colorado cotToraclon, trn.rrl prrt-
tla r
Attll?:" 4t ? 4tz=' ,
7.
ll Ul'tlt IE, Crrtor lr .r.cqt.d tlt! trd ot lrur: .t of thrdrt -a t..t lt?.3 tt nrra -o'yr. f" I /i ,4ilAiLJffi"-
II
ganD
Irt
I)r.
t
lcaQDtI lftitrnt rrr rtnorl- rdged brtorr r;.t af iha, tt||. !' L A. tsrh. lr't-r..,
q ld .d oallsl.l ...1.
t.
rntrrurfllrlE
t t a. llrsi I,ill./Lc.t. itoiErrafi ta ti. 3.octH ,lat tlt !.of6-t ot liL.!o1I. ai Olos.ao
t.t
mrr
('.d,tt a Ectcuorl
.v?a-a tor gh. yarr ltl2 rnd ar&..lutt lraaaa. Dot ,at tlu. ud pryDb.
!ta{? oF Lr rca ottc|rt cr camtt cart?ruc[D tt ttt ruT||cattr c,lll strcc 3tr?3! at rtttraSc 3r lft?to tiat3t ?.?3rr rrc*c3calfr t!, tttt, tr acof tt a] raaa t,t.
IttrtcrtrS c]f3H?a, iltot tc rat o|l?atr a Tlttt?nt c| ilt3rnlr'ff3, ltrt a.|lt?tl. r3tnt3?tcrf , t7 rf, t tl .| r.ct. Gr,fl.!!!!rt.|, ar r.rrr.t rttrr, rl C.rrerr3i tr trt?ttr"-rlCnaD!f!9! 91, t''., rr Lar t'| ar r.a. .2r .|| rt rrroaD rr i-rnnrrrrtcoroSD l??3f,t1 aa, trrlr tr tcoil t.l aT ?a- tfa.
oiatr.tc :ittrStt t0 F33r tt rtoilt alcia tlta tot t|Ir|'3ftt Lct tnf,.? 0utJSct FtcF:rty af tloft or t*t t3c0to30 ?Lrt o? uAtl/?ctato?atc{.
uttttrY t|3cl3lt ilo r33r tr rtorx ?tatclltft lt,|Jtcr rlcrGlyv at
'|rcs 0I nf, mcotoc0 tLat ct urtl/?otato ra?c{.
a, t!t!. c00tilc3 tp triltstG c rrf,tfT ilTEO t tx.y 22, t t ?EtEEi t{Atl [ytLtrl'ngrt| m.rtts r. gfrfi ttnlq/arv tn A3 rcrT Fil irn r. 2{nx ltamD roajiltt, l$e tr B 336 Al PlBt 63.
r.. rral rl!..rirrlrir.rror.||r\rr rrrrr.r:r,rr\rrsrnr'|r_r:\rrr\.rrrrir|rrr;1,,rt;;';),,ti,ft,lt,.t'lt
i-r^. l' ll
rt
25!il ",
',^ -. Ji" i
ts -l{L-
? r lll{ '83
./,aa
.l, (,f. I i
f(rrtt l:{)t l\t}:\lTtl}ll }: t l'l}:} lTtTt:t'F\1
l\,r'r.nl r, l;'!.n (t9 j Art''1" 22 l'rl'! :rt ( l'|t'ri' H -rl ili"rl"' lqi' r' !tr"'dFl"
rhx, r6, ,,nd'irn,d ,nt, n?j' r' l rt' Ir'r{rrn"ni 'rr rr'!" 'di i' \'!'! ^"-,,: :'l'llj::
L (L:
--,, 1
iii!i
G
raa -a t vl|..., .-. at |.lldnt .trt-"t of ll"n
7|tl,-tia L -.. rat .e-? " ttFttrd otn?r
J|llFdtt L d.rta tlth th. l.tr l|'
Er f. |5tb &.
l&b IdFt It trq
t}.1 tb n.r ., rh. n ?ron rho ttrrniaLd tht mrt"'rl
.dlEtt, Lt,ta t.qtlprni tot rhLh .rld ]-'t it 'l''m'd r"
ti.lt|!h.tr. otli.th..i}|l.dtt .&.LtlEra ffiru:tlcl lrrc'
ti?r.b fi&zTl|llD -?hrr iFr-r{r-iir trE chrrrrd rrtt' rlr'r 'rrn r''l'r I r*'r ^" 'rr"s'
Blocl 2 lot 6
Vri I Fotrt@ Dltch
.b L-n br rtn lnvrhrru 77O ftrtat.F rlntrtt rl"
c.qitt.'f F,*le Stitr,'l ( ' i. :..1',
|. ar-r'rtot hlfFt :\!!r..bd by f:ULlt Fl{:lpll '|r tll\sl\'
IO leFFr PO ry 31132, Vdl Cn Fl6s8 ") h'
tb (mrttct trn frroJ€('t
Ft)l'iTil. -ThratL a-{ront ol ,ndil,radD.r ,1 .- ,' ,.. '^r t r''
,utnt.h.d. hb.. ala ,t_rar |triotm?t tnr.h,r" ' ' ,' 'n'i 'rl" r'rtr' nt r')r t I !i
rlt tr iu|.ira th.aron .t tF. l{a.l .ta.
lh.
!;?Att .r' 1 (rl,r 't { n' I
CltY tr 1o.,,1' "y I IEN rTtrt
r. Cirrrlc f, tchrt.'r
o,l.tttrl {? .nd t |nlt,..tnvlvr*orni.|i,iroath l! {tr',.
tidq Inc.
trrrt a: ah.t r l.ar. te.d Ih. r'th,n .t.t.{'rna ttf 11?n.trd.b'r I .'
ih.l !h. .||i. rr lr!. !,d i", ...r to tli |r.i 'n n.\ t",'r'1r {tr
'.; ./,
brLd.d.r{r t, ttt,,r* tr*th'r /5
,'la atallatrt rr' rJSt tnl \|'t!{ t or l\tttsl lr, r rlt r lllrr !trlrrr 1l
'!f e{rff-r.'.. r/ao/ts
:l!i'"'-.' ' \:'.,
S*imFr-'""'( ''l'"r,liiiitnF'l-..",,.'..d .1,, r. ,t$'f4* Y/j4 k ':c '^a--tr
r fuU\\- t' /
rlili.;-.."..
25088f1
Phrllius, [arl': i
ItcolDll'i tt^rP
|l lo-
.,.,r;t*l!Fel
xr"l5{-
"rcr _,q 5l
4 3o s n'
ff\6r.trh'l iitl"
l't,lt rFri. drr.i rnr
l^' '.'lr .r"
'lrrr'r, !n,iltrr i,r,,1 r,t nr' I
lr,{ t(, ( Jrllrrr ''1.n1t11:1;
ttrFl ln ,r,nn.:('r j,,f 1. rrll
If, Jf,t{ lt {' l : i.r\r t I ..1'
( t.(.al I t llrfrlr.|(r'
-- 7-,Lr'-.4 t.1
Dttfttct o(plt, clt n
vl.
I.
2.
3.
t.).6.7.
8.
9.
10.lr.
12.
Plrln!l fl ,
D.fandant..
crvll lctloi to. at c1t 67t
toftc! o? r.tt PrrDll.t !t l3t lltclltc, !rc.
M8 fLlCTtfC ltc., . Colo do CcrPor.tlotr,
tSttEl
=frJorti:.lltr'
h lt ll u;f
VAIL In rtlEr3 ltD DIYtLO?lm LIIllltD Il,. @ lor.do Ornorel ?rrtr.nhlP'itm tlcl| ?otllttrgltol , I color.do coqrorttt on,ttt vttlx, ll|fltre 3Avrres r LrI AAlocrlllqr,! coloaa& oortFratl,on,rD r. glrf tmtltla,Lrrret c. trttll,clt4lDro ttrrg 'trtPt
I c!., . color.do corPor.tlon,qrtlJltrc i0tl|'l ODDil rnd vtlfitcl Etlll,
BBf Ctttttfttt ltcoffolAlfD, . t Ir. Corgontlon,llJll t0OItGt tllllf , ltc. . color.do Cc'rPor.tion,lAf at. tElC' .ttdpurr.rc lrrri or lrE Gourrr oF rAcrt, ttrll c cot oRtD,
AtD lrl, gt[ar ?Er|il rlo l^t ctatt Al lfttrlfltt frt! tu!.trct rrrllt ot tti:t Agfloll,
I{CtfICf t8 fflSll CIVA th.t rn rctiott to fonoLore a
rohantct r ll.n h.a baan cfl.ncad lf frctlng tho tltl' to
tbe cot tclng-dercrtbod r..l proFrty ln ttigl' coutty,
colortdo t
tpt 5, Blocl 2, V.ll Potrto Patch, .ccording to th' r'cord'd
pl!t th.r.of,
Alro knoYt rtr-C;;do;-fiii. Unltr I thtougi tt ' ?, . c'rt -ktr ttnlt ' 7?0
potrto lrtch Drlvr c,:rrttorialrni, ln acoordrnc' 'lth th'
i:"io"ir"tr- *cientlon rcoordoi D.€c6.r 21, L"? ln tooL
;6;l;; 9ot; attd condfllnlrn r.P r'c'ordcd DGo'-'r 23'
iisz- 1r, a6or rso rt P!96 903, countl ot !r9l'' Strt' of
Colotado.
Arlo hnorn ta .traat lnd nu$ar, 770 Potrto Pltch OrIv''
v.ll, colorldo 8l;57.
Datcd thif /1/0 dav "t l*/e- , 1933'
t'.tl atarJl-
f.t 6, tlock 2 '
rlao tntn bY ttraat n[D'r "ln th. County of 1.91., st't'
Ornar(.) or l.Putad Orroar (t) t
P:lnclP.l Or PrlF Contrrctor t
!.- of p.r.on(.) Yith rha contrtct'dt John B' Thoa" '
clrtr.ntra trrt, lddr..a and t'l'Phon' S'rt
E'tc3 c tttltl tro ttrt Ltrr talfrrt
iei I 9rltqlt
lor llr ffitt (4, ot raFtt" olr|.r(rl of th'^b'lov-de rcr lbod PloFrty
lI' rri'iiilii' t"- u'Jiii;iili- ;; Pr lr oontr'ctor or hr"e'nt'
F8r|.tr ro c.l.t. t|-rt-lot (1t73). l9!!1^r: h'r'bv glv'n th't !h'
renl{nd t!td. to ir ii- t 'tirn' itrtant vlth th' cl'rt 'nd R'-
ocas ot trlo coaty,'iiiol.iil"l"i-irtrrrrr turnl.h.d rnd/or l.rbor
;;-;;i;F ia;a'rn-ttre riunt o!r 13'300'00'
Lgal d.acrtptlon or eddr.rl t
eot.to ?.tch subdlvl.lon,
?70 Potato Prtch' tovn of vall' riLuate
of Coloredo.
Sllvcrrdo 3avlng. I lp'n Ar'n'
655 F. o.dnyD.nwr, Color.de 80 20l
John !. thoaa Con.tructlon co'
P. o. Eor at6vrll, color.ilo 1116 5l
tarry O'Connaa
2! 31- tlDntcllnlclv.ll. Color.do t165?
3or/a76-231J
tr ,\
6;fTA|66-nd-
!t4rr; " '
tflttl (r coLmDo
COU*?T O' EAGLE
t, r.rry o'|conr:.r, betne. of l'Yl!l^'l:-:l: *::.tlI:: ?"11":':::
"n"" lJ:':l :;;ffi:;
"
:;_ l{."iil:i::. ;:f l l":r:i L::':": H: i;:'fi3""?iil; ll.ilLi'i'it' ril.' iio-lilt'rct oi i narut:9::' ", :":-:^fi. :n:@ntanta tharaof, rnd that thc r'e' ll tru'
ry-'in-irorr, lnton tlon .nd b'llG! '
and "ott""t, to lha b'rl of
rn4 of ficlrl ra.l .
I
ily,coturla3ion GxPl r!! t
subacrlbad lnd tyorn to bcforc ttr' th13 4/ a^y of January' 1984'
by TGrrY o I Conn.r .
witn.rt nY htnd
!.i .r. .
A??tDlvrt G tlltt.tr|G c Sllcl
or--ingrn p rru A Lltl 8?ltEn
ttrAfl ot colot^m
COUNTY O? EACLE
subrcrlb.d .nd
by tarry O'Conner.
f l ttrra rY l'rnd
,c'/:7 t( ..
tt.
r h.r.by ccr : i !I_ !h:: ?i -'\:i,/#^l'I"::"i" l:'fi i. t ltl i.llh.r.byccrttfythatonthLrLZcllyo;.,anu.ly..,9a.. tn,. .nd corrGct "opv"!i iii' iiiiraiot ilt:l: :: ll::.:,:l':,t:::?:I tru. aD{! sorr.c! cql,y er .d bv Cartl,f lad Or r.alr-rat ln th. unl l.d st.t.. n l l, Ft9.g: P::!tl --^'"--- .^A,.rr 6f th.IOt ln tna Unll.o I'r.L'rt E^r' r-'w'- '-----,rrt'knOyn rddfGta Of thatrrrd rell, raturn recaiPt reqrrcrtcd, - t?--tT l-- ,-.,- -?t^r 16 ih. Drtttr'o r'rr' ri'Eurn ! Eev^v;i;;-;;-;t -itttt ttn davr prlor to'llt: ?l'-ttrrona daalgnrtad hcra ^r r t-h rdrtr..r.d a. rol-H;:fi":';;;Tiil";';; th. rlihin stlt.trnt or Lirn' rddr""d a' rot-
lor'a t
Onar(.1 or PGPuLrd o,ncr(r)
or hlt tgcnt:
PrlhclPal or Pr in€ contrrctor
or hla rgcnt I
John !. Thd|.r?. o. lor 695
Vei !, Colorrdo
ryorn to be forr or i.ntt /&- day of January ' f 98l '
.nd of f tc!.1 ..at ' lty cdlatlon 'rPlrGt !
t,r' .];iA'*i.. ."..-;;..*,rwi[C,ff- ;del.loge]-,.rg"..
Sllv.rrdo Srvlngr i lo'n A'rn'
655 Bro.drlyD.nv.r, Colorrdo 80203
plrced
Con3tructlon Co.
81558
zlaa-J..JI:I-{Jfr;
,f.uff*ffil
ftl I 9r';'ltl
8H ALf ffl{ BY T!|ESE PRESENT9 | Th't T'rrv o'conn6r' utshlng to
a?rl l hlrralf ot trrc arovirlonr of th' rtltut' in rucb cascl nadc end
;;id;;-;iol ttr. rllto*lne st't"r'nt or L1'nt
of tha or.nar(s) o!' 'l.Puted ouncr (a) of ruch-ini--irin lt' siI'/"r;do slvin9s and Loan
st^fEtltfl or LrElr
lti8Tr lh.t the nan'
proFrty to b. ch.rged r'lth
bya
theEnt
Aarocl|tlon.
SECOI{D: Tltrt the nane of thc PGrlon(e) ctaiming the lien lr Terry
orconnar, a tubcontractor '
th.t th. nrn€ or the Perron(t) sho furnlshad thc nrterial or Per-
tot i--ii.-r.bor for vrricrr-iaia lt'n lt ct'ain'd i! Tcrrv orconncr'
Th.t thG nanc of th. PrinciPrl contractot uh'n the licn 18 clained
.,ri""ilt..i"t or by tirc i.rigntt of t lubcontractor' (or in c!3e
nanc of such contrrctor-ie-noi kndn to the lten clalmlnt' t atat6-'fo-tft.a-"ii"ct) i3 John B. ?hocr'! conltruction comPrny'
Lot 6,
Potat-o
alto knoYn bY ttrcet nunbcr tt
County of E.gIc, State of Colorado'
on aciount of labor Pcrforncd.
FoURTH: That th! arount of ind'btcdnr'3 du- or oring tt'e clainant
for yhlch ,rld llcn r" "fii".O,-for natcrlalr furnirh€d, faU91 11! 19r-
"ii"l"iiit"t "a, necrriniil'-Io6tc ano ?cli?"11t 'uPPll€d lt s3'300'00'
togcthir Ylth lntarcit thireon !t thc lGg!! rrt''
THIRDT that thc Property to bG charged with luch lien is describ€d
rr.follonr:
Dloci 2,Prtch suHlvislon,
?70 Potrto Prtch, situate in i-he
rrrat-ttrc rgld lien ir held for and
varl, Color.do 8165?
303/ 176-2sts
I, t.rry o'conn.r, b"i ?-?f,l:Yl:1."::.:* *:I, t.rrv o'conn'r, b€i ? of lreful. t!:-:ld btt"g
wo.r o.th, .ro r.v that,r-:i.il;^:i:l::l: i:';ll.':Y:
rala! or col-iADO
Oq'TTY OP E GLE
Subrcrlbed anci
5y 'et rY C'Conner '
tdltnca rnY hendt_ '9. _.
-'.-.....''
aa.
3UOrn Lo beforc mc
.nJ off lci!I teal '
flr!t dulY tYorn
thlt I hava raad
r.hl" 2/d^Y of JanuarY ' 198{ '
tly coonl!aion €rP! rst :
.Jrz#Ka--
l'Po.r o.th, do r'y that.r an rn€ cr'r""' "-'--i.'-; iicn Staternent and
th. vlthln ttrt.-nt or Notlct-of- ll:t::^::.I: thareof; a c thlt tncth. vlthln ttrt.-nt "t_n::1':^: iil:':;";;"i; - lhcreof ; a c thlt theSl.iiii-"t-i"aiut.an"" end lld-!!: l?nl3nll^-t"uac. into.'rtron aabrtrrct of lndabtcalnc.3 rno rnor i"agc. infor'|llrtlon andif il-.t"* .nd corr'ct,. t9-t!? :::t-?:,:I"lt'E !' bcharf of thc crrlnant'b.Ilcf, rnd lr nrde on
rl*+*"*--''*-
I
I
l
I
i
I
Lr r,Cnn,'Ea,qL I r|va.
lr:: ::-._. - r-::-- :ii::=:=:i'.- ::-=:---:
t' oAvfD 3' Tr|lot{. b.tng ot trrlul rC., .rd b.lng tt!.c duty 'FrnI
'rpon onth,rdepor. rnd 3ry that fhir tiotic. ot lntcnt t llla I l,lcn .!nd
.state{hant of ilcr. ,rir 'lall,ed b. cartttl6d nltI, rcturir ra.eipt t.'l'relt."r,
t$rtrge f,rrpard, to each :)i th. f)ll 'ylng
,A..!.r :'H: , 8J{- rA1 r
C-...,J A-T;--r,A','r'' ;. :YSON
5TAfE CP .r-)Lr,xADrr )
)
,, d;.r} )F L:. PISO )
.,..sulcc!!b.',1 and grrori to bcf.'ra d|. till's -:: . 'la'r ''(
t9 t :_, by rvID s. TYS('N.
Ity Co.lraion El9rtal: } hn-r. ',,--!-- -, tt .
t'a-
fiba.a.nd t$br.| r.& f!| Jr._ -
rabf.Haa.|.ld tf l.'r
dl, rDt .. t FbJ irnrr
z5lFE6
PtUiF, blh CountY Oul i Fcc0rd.f
m3a{'-r|' 5f;3,
4:30 a rn
tY\a.ch 'i' t481ncr
Filft,4'llr ram ..Lrrllttlrh.li"f '"l|- tsr irr! iE-
i,g::ll*-.,-
frt - rr- .. th. taa..', il|. ilrrlaLa rh. raatt'.t ''r lrrlot|htd t \r l'1"'r "r tupFltrll r ht
Lthtt, LoL - {i{-.tt ir rl{.} ..|. L h lLli.d lr
lblthrr.D .a||. rrlt iprl.o*t{.. LllE Cutrrci6 iE.
'r.o -*f$!,H,frh.-.*.".h J.n,r', .-r,Fd,i,,., . r'
.LL.rr bt.t nr|ri)b.r|. ??10 lbtajtc) Illtdb !"lr.
--hrf. (bunivn{ BTI€ 8!.t' ul(bl"r'do Tl!!r tl"l'l lt''r rr hlld lor rnilrEr.*.r tfts tr:tafrd E EI.!!n @"Ipt3!fr t.f,ASM'r ri('. lo 'Irqlf) nTrrrill]ln
i|lrer Ff ^tr' t'le. Vflf , O tlfft8 tq t? utrd In ("rtff,crt
'(n]
uith
b rltttuttfi rtojet
Bbd 2 rot 6fdl Fot to htci
touftla. -?ha rL .Furl el fud.i,r.dD.. d,t. o,.t'.a i|'' .l.rnr
ttarh.a. ].Lr .!a ..avln. ,ttt?-.| -rhrn.rr I r l. .h.i eqorPrtu nl '[rtl'.d ''| ,':i1.57 I'F-r'rr'
rttl ld.r.J ttar..G t rl'. bl.l r.a..
E ffl F.rru+ni I u;Asl)n Ix'
Slalt ol ( r,l,0l(ADr)
efTf & colarr.r IE|YER
r..lFlr l. lbhtqr
lbt
I
t"
J Lttl aa |.aLl..| o.tl dslt.t.tn uy.r.t o.lh ao..t3h.l I r'F
telnluP.
raddiaa I bt r.aath.tlhrn.t.a.ri.itoaft.n.naabttrr(r"l'nd'{"'1n""rn'lIn"'II'
t|la lt X-. la tte |r.l .or ttct i.tl*tt.tortr|t l.|.el.C.t rr'',tr.ii,
.bfaia
-f;-/,,', :- .
Xl-a atoi tc b.to. .r thr. /5 d.Y '),
f
r/ty'es
(lsl l I lhJ|eaa.'t, ! l,1r'r
1,.:
-4.
*iii -r a rn rn-tirt rttr.t.o.lrlr ot i..t r' ,
ae ili!:t r .r ^. l a.!- r oti! '
...;$ii, .."^*.
r{ll
P3
Pnrru.r,t , !..r,rn
(la! !^' !tYt. tt..f.,
{+; sDLl\
I4embers of the Plannlnn Cornmlsslon
My name 1s Oary Bossow. I an representlng my wlfe, I{ara
and rnyself (owners of Parcel A of Lot 5 Potato Patch Subdivlslon)
and H.R. tr','arters and August Grasls, Jolnt Venture (owners of
Parcel B of Lot ! Potato Patch Subdlvlslon).
i'iy posltlon and the posltlon of the persons whom I re-
present l-s j-n strong opposltlon of amendlng Ordlnance #30 to alLow
for an increase 1n the number of unlts to be constructed at 770
Potato Patch Drlve
fhe purchase of the land and the constructlon of our re-
sldences was based on present day zonlng requirements and property
value-,r of the surroundlng property. The actlon of allowlng for
lncresed density w111 only serve to reduce present day property
values. Most unlts bullt ln the Potato Patch Subdlvlslon are
larger and of greater value than the unlts proposed for constructlon.
by I4r. Smlth. Thls ln 1tself will unfalrly reduce property values
of the existlng homeowners. An lncrease on the nunber of unlts w1lL
also lncrease the crafflc count, congestlon. anci place Breater
demands on our sei.rer, r,later. &Dd dralnage systems. It ls our feellng
that the present ffO ?o""ato Patch proJeet l.s not an attractlve
asset to ou!' subdivislon as 1t 1s but thai allowlng for addltlonal
densl---;- carr on1; becaonre a ijrearer negatlve factor to present prcperil
ownet s.
i,'r: a.s* fc:. a negati're responce by the Flat:nin; Conntlsslon
on i,l:'. i:nl'-l':: i'.:lrjes'r, for a chan;e ir. ti:e present- zonin4 :equire-
nent !; .
0,o*,G*to\r
ORDINANCE(Series of
^varget)
tq ['j
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE #30 OF
T977:. CHANGING THE I'IAXIMUM ALLOWABLE Dl^lELLING
UNITS ON LOT 6, BLOCK 2, POTATO PATCH, FROM A
MAXIMUM OF 30 UNITS TOffiG
UN I T ERE GT USINGlJf'flf; SETTI
FL 3h UNIT
i tv;
has
a no
recom-
$r4\h in t i nte es t f pr
the i n-habi tants of the
NOl./, THIREFORE, BE
OF VAI L , COLORADO, THAT
of tlle o\'i nion
+^^i ng t eal th,rfol irr a
Town of Vaj I ;
IT ORDAINED BY THT TOWN COUNC]L OF THE TOWN
e the Communi ty Deve pment Department
zo ne s dards not be ceeded on the site.
percent of t ired oarkinc be enclosed.
ctural
must be
desig of the cture and the materi al s
th
no\
'ls
I
we I
amendment
fare. of
\
ied
paragraph from the top, i s hereby amended to read as fol I ows :
Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch shall be zoned Medium DensityMulti-Family (MDMF) with a max'i mum of 3b units wjth one unitof the 3b which sha'l I be restri cted to employee housing,.
i-o'ns:
Section 1. Exhib'i A of 0rdinance #30, Series of I977, fifth
ss Residential Floor Area GRFA) of the s j te?I
1. That the Gras determ in
under l'1 Dl'1 F
2. That fifty
3. The archite
and col orsof the site
wHEREAS, Ordjnance #30 of IsTr r"r;ooit$.f;dr&t;i{ t, Potato
Patch to a maxjmum of 30 dwelling units'; ahd' A
t^IHEREAS, the current owner of the propeg[y- wi shes to amend
the alrowabre number of units ," Jrl(ht, ffi.nrch woutd be
restrjcted to employee housing use as a caretaker facj I
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commissjon
mended reriT4rus approval of thi s amendment; and
in
drf el I i ng uni t6 restri eted to Entpl-dy-E-flT-or/--Trrg i and
p{ wHlR \ the Town counci
v'i a1ly harmoni ous wi th the remai nder
unilmus ot adve qt rg
fa ent s ctures
q The appl icant shal I agree in writing:
That the emPloYe housing uni shal I not be sol d,
transferred or con ed uni for a period of not
I ess than the I i fe o l,,lill'i am Ruder, a ljfe
vacy
in being, P1 us twentY
the Certi ficate of 0cq
and
That the emPlor rented for Qyee
consecutive days)shall be rented on
employees in the UPP
Eagle Va11ey" shall
Avon and the'ir
employee" is a
(30 ) hours Per
21) years from date thatv is-'i ssued for said uni
Eaqle Va11eY. The "UPPer
d.eEmed to include the Gore
. A "full-time
an average of thi rtY
+
h
v
person who wo
week; and
it
Vailey, Minturn, Rfd C1i Gi lman, Eagl e-Vai I ' and
T ha t the emPl oYee ous I n irit snatl not be divided
into any form of t ies, interval ownershiP or
fracti onal fee, and
o.That a declarat of covenant and restrictions shall
be fi I ed of recor i n the 6e of the Eagle CountY
Cl erk and Recorder
Attorney for the bq
the restri cti ons re'l
approved bY the Town
the Town to i nsure that'| run.with the land.
Sect'i on 2 If any part, sectlon'subsecti on ' sentence ' c lause
or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason hel d to be i nval i d, such
porti ons of
woul d have
on, sentence '
decision
this ordi
shall not effect the val idity of the remaining
nance; and the Town Counci I herebY decl ares i t
passed thi s ordi nance, and each part' section, subsect'i
clauseorphrasethereof'regardlesSofthefactthatanyoneormore
parts, secti ons, subsecti on, sentences '
invalid.
cl auses or Phrases be decl ared
Section 3. The Town Councj I herebY fi nds , determines and decl ares
, safetY and
wel f are of the Tot^tn
Section 4' The
that this ordinance'i s necessary and proper for the health
of Va i I and the i nhabi tants thereof '
repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any
prov 1sl on of the Vail 14unic'i pa1 Code is provided in this ordinance
shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty jmposed, df,Y
v i ol ati on that occurred pri or to the effect ive date hereof, anY
action or Proceeding asprosecuti on commenced ' nor any other
commenced under or bY virtue of the
rmit of
-2-
provision rePealed or rePealed
INTRODUCED,,FqAB ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
PLbt'rt-\'l
ONCE IN FULL THIS:FEh DAY OF OtIf;E-R, 1981, AND A PUBLIC HEARING ON
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE HELD AT THE REGULA& MEETING OF THE /TOI'JN JOUNCIL4l ''t .--! /J/1,9/.t1
OF THE TOI{N OF VAIL, COLORADO, ON "' €fu,_ DAY OF
and reenacted. The repeal of any prov'ision hereby shall not revive
any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded
unless expresslY stated herein.
198
ATTEST:
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
DIIAI T<T:rI fu THIS:::E- DAY OF
i4 r ,ts'ut. u
ATT EST :
-J-
{* N'b \'ka-
PROJECT:
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC WORKS
Reviewed by:
Comments:
za-4.2<-z- Z!c<.x1--/ tU>tl '-'/
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
TOt.lN ATTORNEY
Reviewed by:
Comments:
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL REVI El.l
Reviewed by: -Z-'.''.*s-Date: F' ./' f4/
comments: z'aty f,n-/.t-s fla*o* / z-z-':ry:::=
DATE OF PUBLICE HEARING:
Date:
Date:
Date:
e ,4'z-ra 2-t/ ,'-'/'z<'?
Date:
INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVI Ehl
PUBLIC t,JORKS
^"r"**" 81 o^r", e/z/g+
co^ "nttbc +(.d 3*stn t e.tLv&t t.c,.*4) tttahl. tc7fcl
urfgajf Stto-tt-- oe fr't+'r.tru6t
3 ;rc H).::: : :::x"T: :,*"
.vll€r? It
PROJECT:7o
DATE SUBMITTED:
COMMENTS NEEDED BY:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
POLICE DEPARTI4ENT
Reviewed by:
Corrnents:
TOl.lN ATTORNEY
Reviewed by:
Comments:
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Reviewed by:
Comments:
OF PUBLICE HEARING:
Date:
Date:
Date:
DATE
Date:
Perition l" zfrcf<l
PETITION FORM FOR AMEND}4ENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OR
REQUEST FORA CHA}IGE IN DISTRTCT BOT'NDARIES
FEE $roo.o0 pArD_a_a_o._o_d ,/ 4 r/ . /S<-.c.t-i gr,._,
A list of the names of owners ofsubject property , and their ,r*riru
zoning ordinance
ksu.. t
I.This procedure isor for a reguest
A. NA,,uE oF PETTTToNER l?) A
ADDRXSS @
_reguired for any amendrnent to thefor a district boundary change
/2 t?6, pt477oaB.NAT4E OF
ADDRESS
PETITIONER'S REPRESENTA
s.oNn(Zasl
NAME OF OWNER type) ED A, rtnlTH
D.
c.
X
LOCATION OF PROPOSAI
SIGNATURE
*OU""
PHONE
ADDRESS o fu{/,2
T-,EGAI. DESCRTPTION 1ot block filin
all property adjacent to the
addresses .
t'.
( OvER )
Petition fo'n for *l to zonins ord or Requesr t .nunne in roli3iri""
II. Four (4) copies of the following inforrnation:
A. The petition sharr incrude a s,uunary of the proposed revisionof the regulations, or a complete dEscription oi tr,. piopo""achanges in district boundarils-i"a i-*.p i"ai"ating the Lxistingand proposed district bound,aries^. Appriclt nust subnit written a4d,/orgraphic naterials stating the reasons for iiquest.
Iff. Time Requirements
The Planning and Environmental cornrnission rneets on the 2nd and 4thMond,ays of each month. A petition with the-necessary accompanyingmateriar must be submitted four _ weeks prior to the date of the meet_ing' Following the pianning and nnviroiunenial comruission meeting,alr amendments to the zoning ordinance or district boundary changemust go to the Town Council for tinal ".ii"".
Berridge Associates, Inc.
Planning . Landscape Architecture
July 16, l9B4
PeEer Patten
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Peter,
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Ordinance 30 of 1977 in order
to change the restriction relating to the number of units from 3l to 37 on
Lot 6. Block 2, Yail Potato Patch Subdivision. The Lot is zoned Medium
Density Multiple Family and under normal conditions [without the additional
restrictions placed upon the_.site by-Ordi.nance 30 of 19771 would allow 66
units and a maximum GRFA.of 56,t1tll. T.his GRFA was not restricted by
the Ordinance and it is the intent to stav within this maximum allowable
GRFA for the site.
BACKGROUND
In 1970 Lot 6, Block 2 was annexed into the Town of Vail and zoned Medium
Density Multiple Family Zone District tMDMFl. At that time the MDMF zone
woufd have allowed I l7 dwelling units to be constructed upon the site. ln 1977
the Town of Vail adopted Ordinance 30 which was intended to bring "parcels
of property into conformity with the neighborhoods in which they are located
and the Towns' comprehensive planning". As a result of the Ordinance a
restriction was placed upon Lot 6 which limited the maximum number of
dwe lling units to 30.
As you'll recall, in October of 1981 the owner of the property applied for
an amendment to Ordinance 30 of 1977 in order to receive the ability to construct
an employee housing unit upon the site. That request was approved and
thus the maximum was amended f rom 30 to 3l .
Currently, the property still carries the MDMF zoning which would allow 66
units to be constructed uoon the site. Due to this fact, the addition of units
requires only the €mendment to Ordinance 3O of 1977 and not a re-zoning, The
actual zoning of the property allows the current proposal.
At this time l7 units Iincluding the caretaker unit] have been constructed at a
total square footage of 32, 194 sq.ft.. Under the current restrictions of
Ordinance 30, l4 additional units mav be constructed at a total of 24,2\7 sq,f t..
245 Valleio St. . San Francisco California 941 I 1 . (415) 433-2357
P. O. Box 6364 . Denver, Colorado 80206 . (303) 863-1059
1000 So. Frontage Fd. West, Sute 100 . Vai , Colorado81657 . (303) 476-0851
IPAGE 2
THE PROPOSAL
Currently plans exist and are approved for Phase 2 of 77O Potato Patch. The
plan depicts l4 additional units and the utilization of the remaining GRFA upon
the site. The proposal which requires the amendment to Ordinance 30 of 1977
is to construct 20 units in Phase 2 at a GRFA total of 22,557 sq.ft.. This is
an increase of six dwelling units over the existing plans for the property
however the applicant believes that the benefits of the proposed amendment
far outweigh any negative aspects.
The results of the amendment and thus the approval of new plan for Phase 2
are the following:
A substantial increase in the amount of open space aveilable for
landscaping. The amount of site coverage has been reduced from
the previous Phase 2 ptan u @@, The project will actually
appear to be less dense than th-E-p-reviously approved plan. The total
site coverage of the77O project will be 23% of the site as opposed to
the 45% allowed by the MDMF Zone District. The allowed coverage
in the Primary/Secondary Zone District which is adjacent to the site
is 2O% and therefore the revised plan will be more compatible with
the surrounding neighborhood in terms of open space and landscaping.
Existing stands of Aspen previously proposed to be removed will be able
to be retsined with the new olan.
A reduction in the proposed GRFA, The revised plan for Phase 2 is
planned to contain a GRFA of 22,557 sq.ft, as opposed to the allowed
24,247 sq,ft,, This reduction of 1690 sq.ft, will result in the project
containing less building mess than the previous plan even though there
will be additional dwelling units.
3. The number of bedrooms within the project will increase in Phase 2 from
42 previously proposed to 44. We do not believe thar 2 additional
bedrooms will signif icantly slter any of the aspects of the project.
In summary, I think you will find if you read the minutes of the meeting at
which Ordinance 30 of 1977 was adopted and alsro the intent of the Ordinance
that our request makes good sense and does not do anything to violate or
jeopardize the Ordinance. The proposal, in fact, serves to acheive much more
conformity and compatiblility with the existing neighborhood than did the previous
design.
ln 1977 when the Ordinance placing the unit restriction upon the property was
adopted the Planning Director stated at the time that "the process is an ongoing
one, designed to manage growth as opposed to controlling growth". This indicates
that the intent was certainly nol Eo prohibit a certain €mount of f lexibility and
ability for re-evaluation of certain parcels of property through time as is
requested with this proposal. We believe that the underlying MDMF Zone District
designation allows that f lexibility with this site and that the proposal clearly
presents some positive resu lts.
lf you have any questions regarding the amendment please do not hesitate to
I
7
2.
contEct
Berridge Associates, Inc.
ill Robert L. Arnold lsociates
Architects
1OO0 Soulh Frontaoe Road WestVail. Colorado 81567(304t) 476- 1147
PHASE II
TO+o-T-nrO PATcH DR I V E
VAIL, COLORADO
SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS
(GFA) Gross Floor Area (GRFA) Gross Residential Floor Area
UNIT A Lower 622.25 556.0Middle 642.25 497.3T764lilx+ 5,058.0 l;05m x4 4,213.?
UNIT B Lower 557.0 484.6Middle 627.0 483.9TJE'4.T-x4 4,736.0 --96815. x4 3,874.0
UNIT c Lower 581.0 535.5Middle 637.5 502.1TIZTEFx+ 4,874 m37l. x4 4,'150.4
UNITD Upper 1,583.0 X4 6,332 1,404-4 X4 5'617.6
Fl at
UNIT E Midd]e 662.75 593.0Upper 6'18.0 528.qT7ffimxz 2,561.5 II2TT xz 2,?42.0
UNIT F Middle 740.75 647.0Upper 696.00 583.0\fi6175x2 2,873.5 1730:0 xz 2,460.0
PROJECT TOTAL: 26,435 SF
BEDROOMS COUNT:
UnitA-2BedroomsX4 IUnitB-2BedroomsX4 8UnitC-2BedroomsX4 8Un'itD-3BedroomsX4 12UnitE-2BedroomsX2 4UnitF-2BedroomsX2 4
- Tota'l Bedrooms for
Phase II of Project: 44
22,557 SF
Robert L. Arnold AIA
Daryl V Harris AIA
Michael B. Houx AIA
July 10, i984
The Town of Vail
Building Department
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Gen!lemen:
Michael Lauterbach has my approval
rezoning and redesign as it affects
770 Potato Patch, Phase IL
to ac-t on r y behalf to appll' f o:-
I lro zlorral rnmanf e l'- "sPectc o
I
ll<
rh
F i1rg.
V)' ,ll'l LtEd A.
/.(
.,d00
..ido
blnL I hlre
(
(
.tlbtLI Iaa'r a-tart.a taa,? |
AuLl
6lKJ /bfza
^r;lfuL I bf2k
Wt b/ zt
tuLz lio
blrobi 2 b/ 4
Ua+
hl z+
ttU,kl,fuqb< 74,
tux //7/Uq/,h bl05 ?
/C/ ,,-bhn ? t' 4/yrna
4lwhe Jh,a //lsra////arfu/u#bq,'"., i/oft
Csnean , b*nA /Vl i "Ju4A.
Ak? lfld*n iun o
flaptail, fll/ /42t0 .
1o/,.'/ldle+ l0 - \)il/,nu'fuX ,trot a
Usr{
lwrrAur, till* /D Jr,
b44 Q//',st ru
flwt/ Ula
.r-o)L- 1 tf ,/r/
f,tnrac t ll1u,pis bO/34
fu't/ar, c,r O,
fl(! haft4ry co, tur /4/a
llAaalqt , lVcel t70ol tLltu/atffi , TtKeS l70Ol
Wwi'f,:e-
,dv
i;'"i); iTiJl;ro6ffigtlyo,'1
La;l,e*,, erlr',lilt Ull/l &/&4,*.ry
Pt)
2ooo7
h*-,(hra (, ,&*r,1k 1,.
PH0NE CALL T0 ASSESSoR 7126184
0wners of 770 Potato Patch:
#5 Barnhard, Terry L
2I9O ROCKCREST hIAY
GoLDEN C0 8040'l
#6 HARRIS, LAUREN C
Box t7t4
ROStllELL, NM 8820I
GRADOS AND GUILLEN ],OH H.
Box 397
VAIL C0 81658
Units 16 thru 31
Vail Investments Ltd
Box 696
Vail
others: HBF Enterprises
500 North Lomaine
1.|00 Heritage Center
Midland TX 7970'l
Y^i&y -f/, e /ry