HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 Vail Town Council Minutes
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COU NCI L OF THE TOWN OF VA I L
JANUARY 16, 1973
1W A regular, meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., January 16, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Councilman Donovan introduced Ordinance No. 1 (Series of 1973); AN
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF--
WAY, THE SAME BEING LOCATED WITHIN VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH
FILING, WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL. The Mayor read the title in full
and advised the members of the audience present that copies of the ordi-
nance were available. Mr. Minger explained that the deed to this property
has been executed by Vail Associates. The Board was polled as to whether
they had read and understood the ordinance. Councilman Steinberg moved
Ordinance No. 1 be approved and published for public hearing at the meeting
of February 6, 1973; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor. The Mayor
noted that the motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to publish
the ordinance and notice of hearing.
Councilman White introduced Ordinance No. 2 (Series of 1973); AN ORDINANCE
PROVIDING FOR THE REVIEW OF ALL APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING
PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL. The Mayor
read the title in full and advised the members of the audience present that
copies of the ordinance were available. Mr. Robinson explained the changes
. that have been made from the first draft: environmental considerations have
been added; a review fee of $75.00 was added; the fact that the review period
of 30 days was in addition to those periods specified in the building code was
clarified. The Mayor noted that another basic change was that the ordinance
is not going to be presented as an emergency ordinance. Mr. Minger explained
that following the public meeting on possible growth restrictions and consulta-
tions with individuals experienced in -the matter, the decision has been made
to have the Council review each application. In this manner, the Council can
comment on the possible effect of the new zoning ordinance on each proposed
project.
Mayor Dobson indicated that the developer should be present when the plans
were reviewed. Mr. Hibberd asked if complete plans and specifications were
required before review. Although the complete plans are required before a
permit is issued and before final Council approval is given, the Council would
be willing to do a preliminary review on incomplete plans, if it were desired.
Mr. Hibberd asked what would happen to phased projects; often the developer
has made commitments for future buildings to financial institutions or potential
buyers. Councilman Steinberg responded that he would, in that case, like to
see proof of these commitments and proceed from that point; he emphasized
that the Council is attempting to avoid predetermined approaches. Mr. Hibberd
was of the opinion that some of the criteria for review were too vague. There
was some discussion of whether a $300 fine was enough; Mr. Robinson suggested
r?
that, as in the case of a violation the individual would also be violating the
building code and be subject to the penalities it contains, the penalty seemed
adequate, It was noted that, under the new ordinance, the town may become
more involved in architectural control.
There being no further discussion, the Mayor polled the Board as to whether
they had read and understood the ordinance; Councilmen White, Langmaid,
Staufer, Steinberg and Donovan each indicated that he had read and under-
stood. Councilman Steinberg moved that Ordinance No. 2 be approved and
published for public hearing at the meeting of February 6, 1973; Council-
man Staufer seconded; Councilmen White, Langma Id, Staufer, Steinberg,
Donovan and Dobson voted in favor. The Mayor declared that the motion
carried and instructed the Town Clerk to publish same.
The minutes of the meetings of December 19 and December 26 had been
previously submitted to the Council. Councilman Staufer moved -they be
approved; Councilman Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mr. Minger presented several informational items: 1 . the Rocky Mountain
Soccer Camp will be held in Vail on July 8 to 13 and July 15 to 20; 2. figures
have been compiled which show an increase in use of the shuttle bus over the
last year; the amount of evening use indicates that perhaps the service should
be expanded next year; the Ginkelvan will arrive around the first of February;
3. a report from the information center and traffic gate is available showing
the most frequently asked questions; the requirement of a time ticket on any
car going through the gate is proving successful in eliminating some traffic
in the area. As many questions have been asked regarding the use of heli-
copters in the Vail area, a report had been prepared on the subject. In
essence, Vail Associates has an agreement with Helicopters Unlimited 'for
landing and storage space for a helicopter -to be used for mountain evacuation,
some passenger service, and the corporate needs of Vail Associates. No
official landing has been designated by the FAA; they suggest that the Town
address itself to this question. Councilman Staufer suggested that in a nar-
row valley there actually is no way to minimize noise and disturbance. Council-
man Langmaid pointed out that such a landing site is against the Town ordinances.
Councilman Steinberg pointed out that the clinic is considering an increased
use of helicopters for routine ambulance cases; however, this could be arranged
with the landing at Meadow Mountain. It was suggested that a meeting be held
with Mr. Almond and Mr. Kasdorf. There was general agreement with the
suggestion. Prior to the meeting, the helicopter service will be requested to
land outside the corporate limits of the town, except for emergency cases.
Andre De Lucinges presented the Board with the question whether there is any-
thing that can be done about the employee housing situation in Vail. He suggested
that this was also tied to a transportation problem if employees live in outlying
areas. Mayor Dobson agreed that this is a very real problem; however, he did
not think that it is suitable for the taxpayers, per se, to be asked to address
themselves to it. Rather, it is a problem for the individual businessmen and
their groups. Mr. DeLucinges noted that the problem of employees seems to
be getting worse. He also asked if the Town is planning to build a gymnasium
on the Antholz property. Mayor Dobson noted that the Council is hoping to get
citizen input as to what kinds of things the Town should be doing. As the Town
does not at present own the property, there have been no plans made. In regard
to the lack of public transportation, it is possible that private individuals will
develop such a system in the future. Also, it is possible that the Town might
individually run the system within Town and Vail Associates provide service
in the larger valley.
Stan Hawes of the Vail Villager asked the Council's response to the interpreta-
tion of Dale McCall that they are not. in favor of further promotion of Vail. The
general consensus was that no one thinks promotion should be curtailed, as the
response to the current concern over growth. Rather, the Mayor suggested that
the question of where and how promoted should be Investigated. Also, the Board
was in general agreement that the Town should not fund this promotion.
Page 2
r
Mr. Minger introduced Mr. Mike Blair, the new County Planner, and
welcomed him to the area. Mr. Blair made a short statement to -the effect
that it is his hope to get people involved in the county affairs.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the meeting
adjourn at 8:45 p.m.; Councilman Steinberg seconded, approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk
•
W
•
Page 3
MINUTES
JOINT MEETING
TOWN COUNCI Lr, OF THE. TOWN.OF VAI L
AND
BOARD OF DIRECTORS/VAI L METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
A joint meeting of the Town Council with the Board of Directors of the Vail
Metropolitan Recreation District was convened at 8;45 p. m. , January 16,
1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building..
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Chairman Rod Slifer and the following members were present:
Dave Garton
Ted Kindel
` Gerry White
Also present were :
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Discussion first centered on the proposed golf and tennis rates for 1973. Some
of the major changes over the 1972 rates were: 1 . the establishment of off-
season and on-season golf rates; 2. an increase in the rate for a golf season
pass for non-taxpayers to the Recreation District; 3. the establishment of
an hour playing period for tennis as well as the hour and a half period; 4. the
elimination of the charge based on number of people playing tennis; 5. the
elimination of the difference between week-day and week-end hourly rates;
6. an increase in the season tennis pass rate for non-taxpayers to the district.
Mr. Slifer noted that there is not a group discount for golf, the feeling being
that such a rate is unfair to the tourist who is not with a group.
0- Councilman Donovan inquired how long a person with a season pass could play
tennis. Mr. Garton noted that the pro has in the past limited play to once a
day for an hour and a half. Mr. White added that in the coming season there
will probably be only 3 courts available for hour and a half play; perhaps at
peak times, all the courts will be for an hour only. Councilman Staufer sug-
gested that it is still very difficult for an outside person to be able to use the
courts. Also, he felt that the break for the taxpayer was not great enough and
the rate for the season pass too low. Mr. Garton noted that the Board has tried
to find ways to enable the tourist. to make reservations in advance. Councilman
Steinberg suggested that season pass holders should be limited to play once or
twice a week; if they care to play more, they must pay the regular rate. There
was some discussion of whether such an arrangement would be desirable and
equitable.
Mayor Dobson suggested that the framework for discussion of these problems
should be set by a consideration of the dual role the district is attempting to
fulfill. On the one hand they are attempting to produce a viable resort for the
summer, and on the other, to provide municipal facilities for local citizens.
In regard to a survey taken last August, season pass holders use the courts
60 to 70% of the time. Mr. McLaughlin stated his opinion that in regard to
golf, the exact opposite situation exists; the tourist use preempts much local
use. Mr. Slifer explained that the Board had considered the construction of
additional courts in the Golden Peak area. However, as this would not be the
most desirable location if other land was available, the 'Board postponed any
/_ - . M
new construction until the land question is settled. At that time a bond issue
would be necessary.
Further discussion of the tourist-use, local-use question brought out the
suggestions that some courts could be set aside for tourists or the pro.could
*Silo, encourage program nights, such as men's night, which allow a great many
people to play.in a relatively short time. The installation of lights on the
courts has not appeared to be a viable program because of the nuisance to
neighbors and economic considerations.
One reason for the over--taxed conditions on the courts is the fact that they are
serving the entire valley. There is a plan for four courts of a private nature.
in East Vail and, also Vail Associates is going to build :4 to 6 courts in Lions-
head.' Mr. SLiPer stated that the Board has been considering an expansion of the
boundaries of the District beyond the boundaries of the Town. If this were done,
they could build courts at the ends of the valley. Pending a development of
this type, Councilman Steinberg suggested that three categories of season pass
holders be established; taxpayers, certified employees of taxpayers, and non-
taxpayers. Discussion of this suggestion centered on whether there would be.
many people in the third category and also on the nature of the obligation to
the second category. An attempt will be made to arrive at the size of each
group represented in last year's season pass holders. Councilman Steinberg
suggested that the refinishing of the tennis courts at Malloit Park was one
item that should be encouraged by whatever means available. Councilman
Staufer suggested that rather than sell three categories of season passes,
these passes should only be sold to taxpayers or their employees. In addition,
he felt no seven-day passes should be sold. Councilman Donovan agreed,
especially as this might give residents of these areas the impetus to annex
to the Recreation District. In regard to the suggestion made ear tier that
some courts be set aside for tourists, a member of the audience suggested
that the various lodges should not be allowed to advertise that these courts
are reserved for their needs.
In regard to golf, it was suggested that an off-hours pass be offered. In regard
to the problem of how to handle the golf groups, it was suggested that loopholes
be enforced in their starting times. It was suggested that the rates for the
golf course are too high; however, Mr. Slifer noted that it is necessary for the
golf course to make money in order to finance improvements, pay the land
rent, and operate on the very short season.
Mr. Slifer noted that it is necessary to get an operator for the clubhouse facility
for next summer. Mr. Purcell and Mr. Donovan have again shown an interest
S and the Board was impressed by their previous operation. As the liquor license
is in the name of the Recreation District, no problem is created in that regard.
It was the opinion of the Board that it is impractical to re-bid the operation.
Such'a re-bid is not a legal requirement. Mr. Kindel moved that Mr. Donovan
and Mr. Purcell be hired to operate the golf clubhouse for the 1973 season;
Mr. White seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mr. Slifer noted that Mr. Muth is no longer eligible to serve on the Board as
he has moved outside the District boundaries. A successor will be appointed
by the Board. He encouraged all interested parties to submit their name to
Linda Hall at the Town Office by February 1. The remaining term is approxi-
mately 3.5 years.
A bill to increase the maximum mill levy of recreation districts from 4 to 6
mills has been brought before the State House of Representatives. Mr. Kindel
that.the Recreation District support this bill; Mr. White seconded; approval was
unanimous.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
th
t
Secr tar d
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAT L
FEBRUARY 5, 1973
0-
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
11:15 a. m. , February 5, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the Following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Jim Slevin, Member, Planning Commission
The planners, Royston, Girvin, Livingston, and van Ginkel were also present.
The first item discussed was the fact that applications for building permits
have been received for an additional $20 million of construction. No permits
have been issued. One reason which might be given for delays is that the
capacity of the sewer system is inadequate to handle the projects. Mr.
Livingston indicated that he would have a report on the changes in the zoning
ordinance prepared by the middle of March. Prior to this date, high priority
items can be completed. For example, they have already prepared a prelim-
inary report on parking. The assumption underlying this report is that -the
person who comes to Vail should be able to exist entirely without a car. It
also appears necessary for the day-skier to park outside of the center of
town and be transported to the lifts. Their recommendation for the financing
of any parking structure was to assess the owner of a building on the basis of
benefit derived from the structure. if an individual has already provided
parking within an area that is designated to become pedestrian, this parking.
will be eliminated and the person given credit on the basis of the dollar invest-
ment in the improvements he has made. He will not be given credit for the
value of the land, as this can be put to other uses. Mr. Royston emphasized
that the frontage road must be viewed as the major means of vehicle movement.
Mr. van Ginkel emphasized the need to avoid looking at the automobile as the
only means of access -to the valley, or as the only means of moving people and
goods. The restraints necessary on both the resident and the visitor must be
considered.
Mr. Royston had made a listing of the transportation needs in Vail: 1.. to
move people on their daily work rounds; 2. to move people for sightseeing;
3. 'to move people to recreational experiences and places; 4. to service
the shops, rooms and homes, perhaps requiring a vehicle different from that
required by the first three needs listed; 5. to collect -the garbage, again a
different vehicle; 5. to transport the day--skier; and 7. to accommodate
growth in east and west Vail. Councilman White suggested that an eighth
category of transportation users would be the second-home owners, most
of whom bring their cars to Vail. Mr. Minger suggested that the way to
eliminate this use of the car was to eliminate the option and make the car a
detriment.
A
Councilman White suggested that to make a transportation system effective,
it can't be slowed down at non-peak periods. If this is done, the system
becomes inconvenient and people will not make use of it. Following some
discussion, it was suggested that buses would have to run on a Five-minute
interval basis. Mr. van Ginkel suggested that at some point, however, the
surplus of buses becomes as bad as a surplus of cars. Mayor Dobson sug-
gested that, in reality, -two problems were being considered: 1. the problem
of eliminating cars from the pedestrian core and providing an alternative means
of transportation that does not violate the pedestrian concept; and 2. the
problem of mitigating the effect of cars in the larger valley. In the latter
instance, a five-minute schedule would seem to be too expensive and impos-
sible to follow.
Mr. Minger expressed his concern that, as the transportation system of the
valley is in a state of change, extreme care needs to be exercised in designing
a transportation terminal. It is possible that if designed for today's system,
it would be obsolete within 5 years. Mr. van Ginkel expressed his concurrence
with the opinion that the main parking lot could be the place for a structure.
Mr. Livingston was of the opinion that if the structure is placed in that loca-
tion, East Meadow Drive would need to be closed. At present, the amount of
traffic makes it difficult to move from the parking lot to the core on foot.
Councilman Donovan disagreed with the method of financing proposed by Mr.
Livingston. He was of the opinion that the sales tax generated on Bridge
Street is supportive of the entire Town and hence, the entire Town should
finance the structure.
On the matter of pending construction, Mayor Dobson suggested that it was
necessary to obtain some further piecemeal standards from Mr. Livingston.
It was his understanding that the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation problem was
very bad and would require another construction season to be corrected.
Discussion of what standards were to be applied led to the suggestion that
Mr. Royston's office provide the Council with maps showing the open space
and related items they propose. Councilman White was of the opinion that
there are two types of developments with which the Council must deal: 1 .
those developments which are far advanced into the planning stage and have
followed the previously applicable rules; and 2. those developments which
are currently only conceptual or for which the plans have only been started.
The ordinances should be amended throughout the interim period in order that
the laws applied to projects of the second category will reflect the new intent.
Mr. Livingston noted that he can provide these amendments within the 30-day
period if he receives the land-use information he has been awaiting.
In regard to ordinances needed, Mr. Minger suggested that an ordinance
adopting a development fee for open space and recreational amenities should
be considered. Mr. Royston suggested that an ordinance should also be
adopted requiring the posting of a bond -to guarantee the completion of the
landscaping plan and its maintenance for one year.
Councilman Langmaid was concerned with the means by which -the Council
could say "no" to a developer. Mr. Royston suggested that the method should
be to talk to the developer until he was wi,lli:ng to offer something to which the
Council could say "yes." Mr. Livingston suggested that if the objection to a
project was on the basis of architecture, for example,. this view could be tied
to a functional deficiency, for example, -that -the garages included in the plans
do not fit in with the parking needs. Mr. van Ginkel concurred with this sug-
gestion. He added that he was of the opinion that the Council would be stronger
in its denials if for every negative answer they could suggest a changed situation
to which they could give a positive answer. Councilman Steinberg suggested
that the water and sanitation problems were the strongest basis for a denial;
Senate Bill 35 gives the power to deny an application on that basis alone. Mr.
y Minger noted that Mr. Rose and a consultant have been working on the determination
of exactly what are the limitations of the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District.
Page 2
Returning to the discussion of the parking structure, Mr. Minger noted that
if an attempt is going to be made to build at least part of the structure next
summer, some commitments and arrangements need to be made now. Mr.
Royston suggested that it is also necessary to begin discussions with the
public now. Mr. Ream, the architect of the previous design for the parking
structure, will be informed of the new ideas which will require changes in
his original design. It might be wise to include buses and related items in
the bond issue. There was some discussion of whether the day-skier would
park in that lot; of whether a provision for parking at a greater distance from
the core would meet the Forest Service requirements. It was also noted that
the Town does not own the land but leases it from Vail Associates. There was
some discussion of whether it is rational to build a major parking structure
in the area where there is the smallest lift capacity. The parking that will
be eliminated by pedestrianizing areas of the core will be picked up in this
structure; also, it is possible that it takes 800 to 1000 cars to keep the core
viable. It was suggested that if the structure is in the main lot, all entrances
and exits should be on the north side.
In response to the direct question as to whether we should proceed on structured
parking, Councilman Staufer stated that it should be made certain that the
structure can be made available for as many alternative uses in the future as
possible. Mr. Royston noted that this would mean that the ceiling height should
be carefully considered. Other considerations and comments made were:
Mr.Slevin - should move ahead on the structure as this opens the door to other
steps; Mr. White - the structure should be built to the maximum size as it
now appears, if this is too large in the future, it can be converted to other
uses; Mr. Langmaid - the large number of buses which are now in Vail on
the weekend should be considered in any plans; Mr. Bailey - in favor of
moving ahead as soon as possible even if the entire structure cannot be built
during the coming summer; Mr. Dobson - if necessary, the transportation
center portion could be built first; Dr. Steinberg - would move ahead as
soon as possible, making allowances for a recreational use for the roof in
the summer. Mayor Dobson summarized that there was a consensus that
plans should be moved ahead on the parking structure.
Mayor Dobson summarized the projects for the near future as: 1 . from Mr.
Livingston, standards to be incorporated into the zoning ordinance are needed;
2. from Mr. Royston, drawings of the proposed pedestrian areas are needed,
3. the Council needs to consider an ordinance for a landscaping bond, an
ordinance for an amenity fee; and to study the water and sanitation situation.
The meeting adjourned at 2:00 p.m.
Town Clerk
Page 3
a
VAIL PLANNING STUDY
0 PARKING: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS
Livingston and Blayney
40 Gold Street
San Francisco, California
Parking problems in Vail primarily involve the lack of adequate parking serving
Vail Village commercial establishments and hotels, and the tremendous park-
ing demands created by visitors during the winter ski season. Completion of
Interstate Route 70 is expected to greatly increase the number of day skiers,
and without remedial action the situation only can worsen. Innovative solutions
are needed soon if Vail is to continue functioning as a high quality winter and
summer resort without being innundated by cars seeking to park in the wrong
places.
Many Vail Village business establishments were built without providing any off-
street parking, and others provided parking that was insufficient to meet their
needs. Fewer visitors, available on-street parking, and parking overflow into
adjoining areas combined to minimize the problems during earlier years of the
Village's development. With increased construction and growing popularity of
the Vail ski slopes came the inevitable parking crunch, only partially relieved
by the use of the main parking lot which is leased to the Town by Vail Associates.
At the same time, it is the lack of parking in the core of the Village that gives
it a special pedestrian orientation and a tight urban character that need to be
enhanced. Lifts within walking distance of the hotels and the difficulty of
driving in winter weather contribute to this quality. Streets in the Village
already have been restricted, allowing only essential access to parking areas.
If the Village could be converted to a pedestrian precinct by closing all streets
to non-essential traffic and filling in parking lot gaps with new buildings, the
Alpine village character originally intended could be fully achieved.
Unfortunately, provision for the automobile did not receive the consideration y
needed when the Village was developed. Development at Lionshed, in contrast,
is proceeding with accommodation of the pedestrian and automobile accorded due
regard. The acuteness of the parking situation in the Village led to recent Zoning
Ordinance amendments that require off-street parking to be provided by new uses,
and for expansions of existing uses. Previously parking was not required in the
C-C zoning district which covers the core of the Village. Prior to incorporation
of the Town provision of off-street parking was optional, and it was provided
only by those businesses which believed it was essential to their economic health
to have adjoining parking facilities.
The dilemma faced now by the Village is that provision of parking facilities
required by the Zoning Ordinance is impossible for some uses which would
like to expand, in some cases onto the portion of their sites originally allo-
cated for parking, and for others provision of any parking is impossible at
their present sites. Attempts to satisfy parking needs at or near the site of
each use would be counter-productive because it would introduce more cars
into what desirably should be an exclusive pedestrian precinct. Only an off-
street parking facility close enough to meet the parking demands generated
in the Village, yet outside of the pedestrian core, could solve the problem.
Adding to the difficulty, it would be desirable if many of those uses which now
have adjoining off-street parking were served by parking elsewhere which did
not bring cars into the pedestrian oriented center. Problems of how to handle
access, parking, delivery of goods, and emergency services will be examined
during the design studies. The approach will focus on solving specific problems
faced by individual establishments.
Unlike most business districts and many vacation communities, visitors to
Vail have a high tendency to park in one location - at a hotel, for example -
and have less need to use their car for movement within the Town. With park-
ing, lodging, restaurants, entertainment facilities, and ski lifts all within
walking distance, the need for using a car to get from one parking lot to another
is diminished. The concept of peripheral parking serving an auto-free pedes-
trian precinct is more workable. An effective, attractive public transportation
system operating throughout the Town could reduce auto usage further, and
would reinforce the pedestrian orientation in the Village and L.ionshed alike.
A 1972 study of parking needs by Beardsley, Davis Associates found a deficiency
of nearly 700 parking spaces in the Vail Mill Creek/Gold Peak area, assuming
Zoning Ordinance requirements are adequate, and proposed that the first priority
for meeting Vail's parking deficiency should be utilization of the main parking lot
to accommodate additional cars in a parking structure. The site is under a long
term (to year 2019) lease to the Town. The parking study also proposed design
guidelines for development of the site and urged additional study of financing
methods and operating questions. Other sites also were suggested for parking
development, including study of potential parking north of the freeway.
The need for additional parking to serve the Village's current deficiency, plus
the relocation of existing parking from those portions of the Village that should
be developed as a pedestrian precinct. apparently can be accommodated in a
suitably designed parking facility at the main lot. Such a facility logically
should be developed as a complete transportation terminal, providing a bus
2.
station,.auto rental facilities, taxi stands, and convenient transfer to Village
and Town-wide transit.
Vail Village Parking Strategy
Although a parking facility would have some citywide benefits, particularly
if it also were to serve as a transportation center, its primary area of bene-
fit would be the Village commercial center. It would be appropriate, then,
that its financing be largely the responsibility of the Village property owners,
with such additional assistance as may be suitable on a citywide basis to the
extent that the facility also benefits a larger area.
The Vail Charter permits the Council to establish local improvement districts,
and permits assessment of the properties within the districts to finance public
improvements. Local improvement districts may be created by the Council,
subject to protests by owners of a majority of the property within the district,
or may be established by petition from more than SO per cent of the land owners.
The improvements would be financed through sale of local improvement district
bonds, which would be repaid from parking fees and from assessments levied
annually. The Charter gives the Council wide flexibility to determine the method
of assessment best suited to the improvement program. If, in addition, the
-! improvement confers benefits on the Town as a whole, the Council may levy a
citywide tax to cover these benefits.
Revenue bonds could be utilized, but it is doubtful that parking fees would be
sufficient to amortize the bonds, and interest rates would be higher than assess-
ment district bonds backed by the Town's credit.
Until design studies are further along and the concept of a pedestrian area for
the Village is firmed up, it is not possible to determine precise boundaries of
the pedestrian precinct, or of a potential parking assessment district. How-
ever, it appears likely that much of the commercial center should be auto-free,
and that existing parking in the area should be reaccommodated. Given this
assumption, two issues arise: how to equitably treat those properties that now
provide parking spaces which should be relocated, and how to equitably assess
the costs of a parking facility to all uses within the benefitted area.
The improvement district concept is widely used throughout the nation as a
means of providing public parking facilities, although the methods of spreading
the assessments to the benefitted properties vaty. Most common means include
an assessment per square foot or front foot, or an assessment based on valuation
3.
of the property. Where there are differing degrees of benefit to different
properties, benefit zones may be established within an assessment district
and different rates of assessment applied in each zone reflecting the relative
benefit.
Assessments based on land area assume distribution of benefits to all prop-
erties in relation to their size. While this is generally true of undeveloped
sites where the land utilization or earning potential of the sites is propor-
tional to their area, it is less true of developed sites which generate different
parking needs according to. their use. In terms of parking demand generated
by various uses, the square foot or area method of assessment does not directly
assess properties on the basis of need or benefit.
Assessments based on valuation may include land valuation only, or may include
land and improvements. Where the parking facility or other public improvement
confers a higher value on benefitted properties, this method allows. the project
to recapture some of that benefit through the resulting higher assessments.
However, it has two drawbacks: like the area distribution of assessments, it
does not relate to parking need or demand of particular uses, and it tends to
discourage investment in new improvements because they lead to increased
assessed valuations which then result in higher payments. Parking demand may
• be high for a low value use, and may be low for a high value use.
An additional method of spreading assessments within the area benefitted by a
parking facility, not widely used but currently gaining in favor, is to base the
assessments on the parking need generated by each use or each property. This
method is most equitable because those uses with a greater parking demand con-
tribute proportionately more toward financing the parking facility. The principal
difficulty lies in determining the precise parking demand of each use, because
of the widely varying needs of the multiplicity of uses usually encountered in a
commercial district. Yet in most communities such a precise schedule already
has been developed, applied and tested -- the schedule of parking requirements
prescribed in the Zoning Ordinance. Assuming that the requirements accurately
reflect the parking demands for various categories of uses, assessments based
on zoning requirements for off-street parking provide an eminently equitable
means of spreading assessments to benefitted properties.
Use of the off-street parking schedule of the Zoning Ordinance for assessment
purposes within an improvement district would not constitute imposing zoning
requirements retroactively on uses which have 'inadequate parking or lack
parking entirely, but are permitted to continue as non-conforming situations.
4.
Rather, it would be a means of equitably spreading the assessment to those
who would benefit, and would apply only within the improvement district
boundaries.
Starting with the basic assumption that each parcel should be assessed in
proportion to the parking demand it generates, an annual assessment per
space required would be levied. This assessment would include capital and
interests costs, plus net operating costs of the parking facility -- or that
portion of the structure which serves the Village in the event the facility has
greater parking capacity. Uses which now have no off-street parking would
be assessed annually on the per space basis, using the Zoning Ordinance
schedule as the measure of parking demand generated. Formulas for credits
against the assessment should be developed to cover two special situations.
First, those uses now providing off-street parking in the designated pedes-
trian precinct but which would not be permitted to continue such parking should
be allowed credits. Most logically, these credits should be based on the value
of existing parking improvements (not land) discounted or amortized from the
date of construction. The credit would be compensation for the loss of parking
improvements which have remaining value or useable life. However, the credit
should not be based on the value of the land because when the parking use is
discontinued the site will then be available for presumably more valuable uses.
In hold-out cases, it would be necessary to condemn the right to use the land
for parking, but the cost would be low where the site could be put to a more
valuable use. (If the parking right cannot be condemned under Colorado law,
it will be necessary to condemn the fee and recoup the cost by resale.)
A second credit schedule should be applied to those uses within the improvement
district which have off-street parking which may continue without detriment to
the pedestrian precinct. In some cases, a use now may only provide a portion
of its required parking. Logically the credits should be the same or close to the
per -space assessment levied elsewhere within the district, since the use pro-
viding some or all of its own parking would be relieving the district of that res -
ponsibility. Uses permitted to retain their parking would have to be evaluated
on the basis of their location and the impact of access to their parking facility
on the pedestrian precinct.
Assessments would be determined annually, based on the parking requirement
of each use on the assessment date. If the use of a property changed during the
year and resulted in a different parking requirement, the assessment in the sub-
sequent year would reflect the change. Because the property owner would be the
long run beneficiary of the parking provided by the improvement district, assess-
ments would be levied against the property. In the case of tenant-occupied prop-
erties or buildings, the cost presumably would be passed on to the tenant in the
form of a rental increase.
5.
The parking facility should be operated on a fee basis, but with provisions
for validation parking for customers (and possibly employees) of businesses
within the district. The fees would be reimbursed to the district by the
businesses validating the parking. Parking fees should be set to discourage
use of the facility by day skiers, particularly at times of peak demand. Fees
also could vary according to demand, with higher rates in winter and on busy
weekends.
Careful, critical review of present parking requirements will be necessary to
assure that the present Zoning Ordinance schedule accurately reflects the
demand generated by each category of use, before adopting the schedule as
the basis of assessment. If instances are found where the parking required
by the ordinance now is either insufficient or excessive, the ordinance should
be amended. Where a combination of uses occupies a single structure or site,
such as a hotel with restaurant, bar, and some shops, the Zoning Ordinance
should be revised to permit a reduction in the total spaces required that
reflects the overlapping parking need. The restaurant, for example, may
have customers who already are hotel guests, and the parking schedule should
not require additional parking when there is not any additional demand.
While Vail's current parking requirements are not substantially out of line with
nationally recognized standards for off-street parking, several of ,the require-
ments need to be checked closely with actual current experience in Vail to be
certain they fairly reflect parking demands generated. The advisability of
accounting for multiple uses within a building has been cited. Various types
of retail and office uses and restaurants should have requirements tailored
to their generation of parking needs, rather than the single standard now in
effect (3 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of primary floor area). Personal
services such as beauty shops usually generate higher demands than furniture
stores or repair services. Banks usually create a greater parking need than
other kinds of offices that have lower volumes of patronage spread over longer
time periods.
Design studies now underway will determine the potential hotel and commercial
space that can be accommodated in the Village if vacant sites are improved
and present parking areas in the pedestrian precinct are discontinued and con-
verted to commercial uses. The total parking requirement of the Village, less
whatever parking can be accommodated on-street or in lots which can remain
• , without impairing the pedestrian concept, will determine the necessary minimum
capacity of the parking facility. To the extent that additional space might be
available in the facility, it can accommodate day skiers.
6.
While most or all of the Village is within walking distance of the parking site,
a local transportation system uniquely serving Vail requirements -- the pro-
posed Ginklevans or "elephant trains" - would increase the accessibility and
vitality of the core. These vehicles would provide transportation of baggage,
skis, and packages as well as people between the parking facility and their'
destinations. Hotels might be permitted to provide additional, specialized
shuttle service such as is common around major airports, provided that their
vehicles did not interfere with pedestrian activity in the core.
Lionshead
_The Beardsley, Davis study found no serious deficiency in parking spaces at
Lionshead, principally because present zoning standards apply to all develop-
ment there. However, there would be a deficiency if day skier demand should
exceed the capacity of the three: public lots in the area. Eventual decking of
parking facilities at Lionshead remains a possibility.
Day Skier Parking
Accommodation of day skier parking will become increasingly crucial when
the completion of Interstate 70 brings Vail within less than two hours driving
time of Denver. Peripheral parking lots outside the Town, with convenient
freeway access that does not congest local streets, appear to be the only logical
solution. Accommodating day skiers in parking structures near the lifts would
be both expensive and physically disruptive. Shuttle bus service between the
lots and the ski lifts, at the Village and Lionshead, and the proposed new lifts will
be necessary. Some popular California ski areas have parking lots so large
that they must provide shuttle service within the lots. Without peripheral lots,
Vail probably would be hopelessly congested with day skier's cars. The pro-
posed parking structure could not adequately meet Village requirements if it
accommodated many day skiers. High daily rates and a validation system
should be used to divert them to the peripheral parking lots.
Transit System
Extension of the proposed Ginklevan service for Vail Village to serve Town-
wide transportation needs should be explored. The Ginklevans, or similar
vehicles particularly suited for low speed, frequent stop service were pro-
posed by the Beardsley, Davis study to link the various.parking lots with
Lionshead, the Village, and other major areas The transit service should
be free, and should be more attractive and convenient than driving within the
Town.
7.
High speed buses, with exterior ski slots, should be used to link the day '
skiers' lots with the Village, Lionshead,. and the new lifts. Quick and easy
transfer to the slower speed, local transit system should be possible.
Conclusion
If the precise location, capacity, and facilities of a parking structure are to
be determined in time to permit construction during the coming building
season, several immediate steps will be necessary. These will be the respon-
sibility of the City staff and the RHBA/L &B consulting team, assisted by archi-
tectural, engineering, and public finance specialists.
Design studies for the Village must be completed to determine the present
parking need and the potential parking demand when vacant sites and sites
now devoted to parking are developed.
- The impact on individual uses of converting the Village to an exclusive
pedestrian precinct should be evaluated, and discussed with the property
owners and businessmen affected.
Preliminary plans and cost estimates, followed by working drawings, must
be prepared for the parking facility.
- The proposed improvement district boundary trust be determined, and
preliminary financial studies must be made to determine what level of
assessment will be necessary within the district to finance the parking
improvements.
-- Necessary Zoning Ordinance changes should be prepared and adopted.
- Interim financing may be needed to cover initial costs and design work on
the parking facility, until district financing can be assured and improve-
ment bonds can be marketed.
When financial and legal feasibility is assured, formation of the improve-
ment district should proceed.
8.
i
f
AGENDA
REGU LAP, MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
FEBRUARY 6, 1973
is 1 . Second reading of Ordinance No. 1; AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE
DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, THE SAME BEING LOCATED
WITHIN VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH FILING, WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL.
2. Second reading of Ordinance No. 2; AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR
THE REVIEW OF ALL APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS FOR
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL.
3. Presentation by Robert Royston regarding the Town of Vail Master RIen.
4. Appointment of a member to the vacancy on the Sign Review Board.
5. Discussion regarding unauthorized parking on private property.
6. Consideration of minutes of meeting of January 16, 1973.
Convene as the Vail, Colorado, Municipal Building Authority.
1. Election of Officers.
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
1 . Hearing on application of Henschel Lyon, Ltd. for a retail liquor store
license.
0
. l
men VAZA
Box 95 Vail, Colorado 81657
January 26,- 1973
E
•
•
Town Council
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gentlemen:
We have carefully reviewed the draft of Ordinance No. 2, Series of
1973, which was presented at the regular meeting of the Town Council
on January 16, 1973.
It appears to us that the Ordinance as presently drafted is not
computable with the economic realities of building design and construc-
tion. As we read the Ordinance final working drawings are required to
be submitted prior to receipt of initial-architectural approval. Since
even minor. changes in building location, height, size and configuration
resulting from architectural review can require significant revisions
of working. drawings, it appears more practical that plot plans, floor
plans and elevations be furnished to the Council for their use in
determining whether to give approval concerning height and size,
architectural design, set--backs, landscaping, compatibility, environ-
mental effects, utility demands, lighting, parking and traffic.
It is not unusual for working drawings for even moderately-priced com-
mercial building to cost in excess of $50,.00.0.. Slight modifications
in height, other dimensions or exterior materials can easily result in
the necessity for completely new engineering and redesigning of working
drawings to the extent that as much as 50.to'60%. of the working-draw-
ings work previously done would be. completely wasted.
In view of the short building season in. Vail, the imposition of an
additional 30 days period for the architectural review by the Town
Council also is incompatible with the practical realities of construc-
tion.
For the foregoing reasons we strongly urge that Ordinance No. 2 of
Series of 1973 not be adopted on February 6, 1973, in its present form
and that it be rewritten to provide for review by the Town Council of
preliminary plans and outline specifications from which working-draw-
ings are reasonably derivable, (riot working drawings), and that the
present time period from the filing of the working drawing to issuance
of a building permit not be enlarged.
JVA:bj.s
ur very truly,
k n V! A o
cc: M. V. Beckstrand
Ralph Frizzell
Charles Gersbach
• 1
r?
L E AV E L L DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
A SUBSIDIARY OF RIO GRANDE INDUSTRIES, INC.
RALPH FRIZZELL
VICE PMMSIp ENT
ONE PARK CENTRAL., SUITE 1250
1 5 1 5 A R A P A H O E ST R E E T
DENVER, COLORADO 80202
P, O. BOX 5 4 6 2 (Z I P 8 0 2 1 7)
TELEPHONE 303/573-$e7S
January 23, 1973
r?
Mr. John A. Dobson, Mayor
The Town of Vail
Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1973
Dear Mayor Dobson :
Our Company fully supports the intent behind Ordinance No. 2, to set up an Architectural
Control Commission. Only in this manner will there be logic to the future development of
the Town of Vail . While the Ordinance's intent is commendable, it does appear that the
mechanics of the Ordinance, specifically requiring working drawings as a precendent to
approval, could, as well as the extension of the time periods, work a hardship on develo-
pers. As an alternative might we suggest that in lieu of the working drawings there be
submitted "outline specifications11along with other evidentary material requested by the
Ordinance. To require working drawings before approval is given could be quite costly
in both terms of time and money in the event changes were required. To reiterate, other
than for the substitution of outline specifications for working drawings and leaving the
time periods as presently set forth, we would strongly recommend adoption of the proposed
Ordinance.
Very truly yours,
•
Ralph Frizzel
R F/cn
cc: John Amato
Charles Gersbach
vj
.
'? • s??
r
i:UII
$
31 January 1973
box 1 148 a nail, colorado 81.657 d 303.476-5613
COMPARATIVE FIGURES
What the state library requires of public library to
be considered "a library in good standing".
population hours open per week'
0--2500 15 hours
25,00--50,000 50-60 hours
Hours Open Per Week
Vail 53
Frisco 20
Aspen 60
Number of Employees
Vail 1 Full-Time Librarian
1 half-time assistant
Frisco 1 Full-time Librarian
1 half--time assistant
Aspen 1 Full--time Librarian
4 full-time assistants
1 Half-time assistant
Circulation for each library on.1/30/73
Vail 125
Frisco 75
Aspen 225
Book Budget for 1973
Vail l 3 , 000
Frisco 5,000
Aspen 6,000
box 1148 . vail, Colorado 81657 s 303.476-5613
Regular circulation
Paperback section
Books in the library
Library card holders
Average Books Per Week
Circulated
Average Books Per Day
Circulated
•
Circulation Figures
NOV 1 DEC 31 JAN 30
9,816 111)452 12,633
5,000 6,ooo 6,2oo
9,000 10,000 10,500
685 795 913
316 425 418.5
63 73 68
u
t
jig
b o x i o o • v a i I , c o l o r a do 8 1 6 5 7 • 3 0 3 • 4 7 6. 5 6 1 3
TO: Terrell. J. Minger, Town Manager
FROM: Bob Manzanares, Administrative Assistant
RE: Trash Franchise
DATE: February 5, 1973
Merv Lapin, from Eagle County Trash removal, has
approached the Town on the possibility of the Town granting his
business a franchise. That franchise would give him the exclu-
sive right to the trash business in the Town of Vail for a period
of years.
Lapin's objective in pursuing a franchise is mainly
for financial reasons. He explains that the trash quantity within
the Town and the County is increasing, thereby necessitating the
need for him to expand his business.
Financially, the Eagle County Trash Removal Co. has a
few alternatives. The Ford Motor Company has indicated it will
grant them a loan at an interest rate of 150. If the Company
is forced to take this alternative, there is a strong possibility
that they may have to raise their present rates.
Their second alternative is going with a bank loan.
National Bank of Denver is willing to grant a loan at an interest
rate of 90, if the Company is able to obtain a franchise from
the Town. This alternative would allow the Trash Co. to expand
their business without having to raise their rates.
From the Town's point of view, there are both advan-
tages and disadvantages.
.I
N.+
•
TO: Terrell J. Minger
FROM: Bob Manzanares
RE: Trash Franchise
DATE: February 5, 1973
Page Two
Advantages:
A franchise gives the Town more control and reviewing
powers over the business. The Town could have a direct
role in the establishment of rates and in criteria for
performance by the business.
Disadvantages:
Through the granting of a franchise the competitive
aspect is minimized. If the franchised company is not
performing satisfactorily, there may be a period of
difficulties (legal), etc. before another company can
get the business.
I would recommend that the Town consider granting such
a franchise, properly worded, so that both parties understand what
is expected of them. I would also recommend that a three (3)
year franchise, with a clause indicating the Company will be reviewed
annually, be considered. In a three year period the Company has
an opportunity to expand and improve and also gives the Town time
to evaluate them more objectively.
Bob Manzanares
BM/nmm
0
.r
c
r ROBERT A. WrK
JOHN I? AKOLT, JR.
LUIS D. ROVIRA
WALLIS L. CAMPBELL
L.Y.S.- S. OrMUTH
' CARL F. EIDF_RGER
WILLIAM G KEMP
ALAN C. DeMUrH
STUART S. GUNCKEL
ROBERT A.BACKUS
ROBERT L. ROSERTS
MITCHELL 61=1,1E[]ICT M
0 BRIAN M. BELL
WILLIAM F. SCHENKEIN
SAMUEL J. OWEN
RUSSELL P. ROWE
DONALD A.HOULEHAN
J. WALTER HYER M
LOMUNDO A. GONZALES
LAW OFFICES OF
AKOLT, DICK, RovIRA, DEMUTH & EIIBERGER JOHN P. AKOLT
1600 WESTERN FEDERAL SAVINGS BUILDING J. H. SHEPHERD
Or COUNSEL
738 SEVENTEENTH STREET ,
DENVrR, COLORADO 802032
TELtPNONE 303-222-1806
January 22, 1973
Mr. Lawrence B. Robinson
City Attorney, Town of Vail
P. O. Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81557
Re: Rights of A & D Enterprises, Inc.
in the Streets of Vail
Dear Mr. Robinson:
I assume that you have had an opportunity to consider our
letter of January 4, 1973, and the materials enclosed therewith.
In view of the private easement rights which'exist.in A & D
Enterprises, Inc., for access to its property by itself and its
employees, customers and invitees, I submit that any encroachment,
limitation or restriction upon those easement rights are unlawful
and constitute a trespass. That includes the present gate arrange-
ment*. Furthermore, it would seem to me that inasmuch as the rights
of A & D Enterprises, Inc,, are a matter of public record, the
trespass was and is a wanton and willful disregard of those rights.
Thus, we request that the Town of Vail, rectify the situation
by removing the gate immediately and by compensating our client for
the past trespasses to date.
Very truly yours,
SSG/lc
cc: Mr. John V. Amato
AKOLT, DICK, ROVIRA, DeMUTH & EIBERGER
By
r
U LV N box i oo . vaiI colorad0
January 29, 1973
Mr. Stuart S. Gunckel
Akolt, Dick, Rovira, DeMuth & Eiberger
Attorneys at Law
718 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Re: Rights of A & D Enterprises, Inc.
in the Streets of Vail
Dear Mr. Gunckel:
8 1 6 5 7 • 3 0 3. 4 7 6. 5 6 1 3
Thank you for your letter of January 22, 1973. Although l have reviewed
the various documents you sent to me on January 22, 1973, I have not had
an opportunity to review the records in the courthouse in Eagle County..
It appears that A & D Enterprises may have obtained from Vail Associates,
Ltd, certain easements for the purpose of gaining access to property
acquired by A & D Enterprises; however, the platting procedure for Eagle
County at that time may have included dedication of rights-of-way prior
to the dedication to the Town of Vail in May, 1967.
In any event, it does not necessarily follow that the Town is prohibited from
regulating traffic on its public streets, notwithstanding any access privileges
that may have been obtained by A & D Enterprises. It is my understanding
that any patron of the liquor store operated by A & D Enterprises is allowed
to use the roadway to gain entrance to the store.
The Town Council for Vail has no immediate intentions to remove the gate
that has been located on Gore Creek Drive for approximately two years. The
Council, however, has been willing to allow reasonable access to the property
of your client and has been under the impression that the current arrangement
is satisfactory to Mr, Amato. If you have any further, suggestions relating to
the regulation of traffic in the subject area, please communicate same to me
and we will make further proposals to the Town Council.
Yours vdhy tru ly?
ON"
Lawrence 1-3. Robinson
Town Attorney
L13R:lh
r
•
Section . Review of Preliminary Plans.
Any applicant who desires may in advance of application for a
building permit submit plot plans, floor plans, elevations, landscaping
plans and outline specifications to the building official for the Town
of Vail who shall transmit such materials to the Town Council which
shall, thereupon, review such material at a regular or special
meeting as provided in the Charter for the Town of Vail. Within a
period not to exceed thirty (30) days from the filing of such material,
the Town Council shall either approve or disapprove such material ,
and in the event of disapproval, shall set forth in a written decision
the reasons for such disapproval. The Town Council may also grant
provisional or conditional approval by imposing specific requirements
which must be met by the applicant as a condition of approval. In the
event the Town Council grants its approval of the submitted material,
the applicant shall prepare the plans and specifications in support of an
application for a building permit which will be subject to review, if
prepared in accordance with the materials previously approved, only
by the building department for normal processing, and in that event
the additional thirty (30) day period provided in Section 1 shall not
apply to the plans and specifications in support of an application for
a building permit.
E
LEAVELL DEVE LO PM E NT CO M PANY
A SUBSIDIARY OF RIO GRANDE INDUSTRIES, INC.
•
RALPH FRIZZELL
voce PgCS'DENT
ONE PARK CENTRAL, 5UITE 1250
1 5 15 A RA P A H O M S T R a F-T
DENVER, COLORADO 150202
F-, 0. BOX S482 (ZIP 80217)
T 5 1.. 5 P H O NF- 3 0 3/ 5 7 3- 8 8 7 6
January 31, 1973
•
Mr. John A. Dobson, Mayor
Town of Vail
Sox 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear John:
The partners in the Leavell-Manor Vail Joint Venture appreciate the offer which
was set forth in you- letter of Iinuary 8, 1973. Rest assured we ore giving it
serious consideration. The Town of Vail will have a definitive response by March
1, 1973. In brief, our idea is to come up with a concept that covers your needs
as well as providing for the Joint Venture's requirements.
Prior to the March Ist date, I hope to be meeting with you to explain our approach.
Sincerely,
R F`cn
cc: Mr. John Amato
Mr. Charles Gersbach
Mr. Richard S. Kitchen, Sr.
Mr. Chris Allison
Ralph Frizze
9
DOCKET DEFENDANT
36 Tim A. Stone
. 39
40
49
69
71
75
78
79
. 85
95
VAIL MUNICIPAL COURT
January 1973
CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
Illegal Parking - Pending
Thomas A. Simon Illegal Parking - Pending
Patricia Marinello Illegal Parking - Pending
Glenn Beinfest illegal Parking - Dismissed
John Murphy Illegal Parking - Pending
Carl Schureestedt Illegal Parking - Pending
James A. Rosa Assault & Battery -- Pending
Danny Arguello Reckles s Driving - Resentenced
January 30, 1973. Fine of
$75.00 to be paid by February 20,
1973.
Konrad Oberlohr
Jeffrey N. Houston
Jack D. Beals
97 Melanie Hyrnyk
98 Wolfgang Herzog
108 Timothy Reuling
113 Gerhard Kurt Lenz
114 Jerome Blackwell
119 Lloyd Thomas
0122 Dollie Shaw
124 John Ivison
Littering - Guilty $25.00
Failure to Appear -- Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty $ 5.00
Failure to Appear -- Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Following too Closely - Dismissed
Limitations on Passing - Dismissed
Expired Safety Sticker - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Improper Passing - Dismissed
Dog-at-Large - Dismissed
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
Maliciously Destroying Property $30.00
- Guilty
Parking in Fire Lane - Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty $11.00
Parking in Emergency Zone - Guilty
DOCKET DEFENDANT CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
126 Dan Livingston Illegal Parking - Pending
127 Lawrence Benway Illegal. Parking - Pending
Failure to Appear -- Pending
129 Richard E. Campbell Assault & Battery - Guilty $55.00
01.30 Willis G. Bergquist Disturbing the Peace - Guilty $30.00
131 Russell D. Bergquist Disturbing the Peace - Guilty $30.00
132 Gerald L. Lucero Disturbing the Peace - Guilty $30.00
133 Joseph P. Riddle Larceny - Guilty $60.00
134 David C. Collins Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 8.00
135 L. Steve Ruder Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty -0-
136 David C. Peterson Special Hazards -- Guilty $27.50
1.37 Robert T. Lazier Violation of Uniform Building
Code Sections 1305 & 1714
-- Dismissed
138 Ronald Riley Illegal Parking - Pending
• Parking in Fire Lane - Pending
ilt
ki
- G
l
$ 8
00
139 Gregory A. Kelchner y
u
Par
ng
Illega .
140 Paul Clark, Jr. illegal Parking - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
141 Rudy M. Vigil Drunk & Disorderly - Pending
142 Elvin C. Bland Indecent Exposure - Pending
143 Robin J. Gardner Larceny - Pending
144 Hubert'Karmeisool Drunk & Disorderly - Pending
145 Francisco Gonzales Trespassing - Pending
146 Joseph Costales Impeding Traffic - Dismissed
147 Pamela A. Wedlake No Safety Inspection - Pending
148 David H. Hannah Speeding - Pending
149 David M. Coe Speeding - Pending
?
r n V Nl l bl Ci A ? .J.. J f rf /
f
. 'Receipts for January 1973 are included with this report. The
Pr total amount is brok en down as follows:
Traffic Fines: $39.50
Other Fines: $245.00
Court Costs: $55.00
TOTAL: $339.50
0
1
Catherine L. Stone, Clerk
9
E
VAIL MUNICIPAL COURT
December 1972
DOCKET
36
39
40
49
69
71
DEFENDANT
Tim A. Stone
Thomas A. Simon,
Patricia Marinello
Glenn Bei.nfest
John Murphy
Carl Schureestedt
CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Assault & Battery - Pending
Wrong Way on One-Way - Guilty $25.00
Motorcycle in Core - Guilty
Reckless Driving - Guilty* $55.00
Careless Driving - Dismissed
Failure to Comply with order
of Police Officer
Disobeyed Stop Sign (4 counts)
-- Dismissed
Littering - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
No Safety Inspection - Not Guilty $30.00
Failure to Appear - Guilty
Illegal Parking Pending
Careless Driving - Guilty $25.00
Disobeyed Stop Sign - Guilty
Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty $55.00
Assault - Guilty
Parking in Fire Lane - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
75 James A. Rosa
76 Peter G. Wyman
78 Danny Arguello
0 79 Konrad Oberlohr
80 Peter Ventres
85 Jeffrey N. Houston
89 William Dickinson
92 John Shalosky
0 95 Jack D. Beals
*Initial sentence was to work for the Town of Vail for 30 days.
Since this is not possible, resentencing is scheduled for
January 24, 1973.
December 1972 - 2
• VOQKET DEFENDANT CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
97 Melanie Hyrnyk illegal Parking - Pending
98 Wolfgang Herzog Following too Closely - Pending
99
100
101
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
ill
112
113
114
115
1.16
117
118
119
Limitations can Passing - Pending
Robert M. Kendall Disobeyed Stop Sign - Guilty
Jane Kelleher Illegal Parking --trot Guilty
Susan Brenden Wrong Way on One-Way - Guilty
Wilhelm P. Blystad Disobeyed Stop Sign -? Guilty
Larry Parsons Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty
Disturbing the Peace - Guilty
Stuart Houk Dog-at-Large - Guilty
Craft Lofland Impeding Street Maintenance
- Guilty
Timothy Reuling---- -Expired Safety Sticker - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Brad Straver Disobeyed Stop Sign - Guilty
Lloyd L. Thomas Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty
Arkidaj Birjulin Impeding Street Maintenance
- Guilty
Richard Broeker Impeding Street Maintenance
-- Guilty
Gerhard Kurt Lenz Improper Passing - Pending
Jerome Blackwell Dog-at-Large - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Joseph Yarmolovich Impeding Traffic - Guilty
Rodney Cain Wrong Way on One-Way - Not Guilty
Edwin Young Disobeyed Step Sign - Dismissed
Charles Betts, Jr. Impeding Street Maintenance
- Dismissed
Lloyd Thomas
120 Peter Ventres
121 Charles Morrison
Maliciously Destroying Property
- Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty
Failure to Yield Right-of-Way
- Guilty
$25.00
$10.00
$ 5.00
$55.00
$ 5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$25.00
$ 5.00
None
$ 5.00
$14.00
$10.00
December 1972 - 3
w '
DO' KET
DEFENDANT
122 Dollie Shaw
123 Fred Simpson
124 John Ivison
125 George Longstrith
126 Dan Livingston
127 Lawrence Benway
128 Amado Lovato
•
Receipts for Decembe
with this report and
Traffic Fines:
Other Fines:
Court Costs:
TOTAL:
CHARGE & DISPOSITION
Parking in Fire Lane -- Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty
Illegal Parking - Pending
Parking in Emergency Zone
- Pending
Illegal Parking - Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking -- Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Disturbing the Peace - Guilty
Resisting Arrest - Guilty
RECEIPTS
$ 3.00
$55.00
C 1972 total $432. The total amount is enclosed
is broken down as follows:
$187,00
$175.00
$ 70.00
$432.00
Also enclosed is a check for $50.00, which is the amount of bond
posted in the People vs. Marilyn Stewart on September 30, 1971.
This case was held open pending notification that Mrs. Stewart
had received effective counseling from her minister. This noti-
fication has not been received.
Catherine L. Stone, Clerk
•
1
•
11d°ti of VOL
box i oo . vail, colorado 81657 • 303. 476-5613
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Members of The Town Council
FROM: Sign Review Board
SUBJECT: Vacancy on Sign Review Board
Mr. Richard Cole, a resident of the Town of Vail has
made application for the vacancy on the Sign Review
Board.
The Sign Review Board has reviewed Mr. Cole's qual-
ifications, and would recommend him to fill this
vacancy.
It should be noted that Mr. Cole's application was the
only one submitted for the current vacancy. This factor,
however, did not influence our recommendation.
Chairman
Sign Review Board
JM/spt
i
t
MINUTES
ti•
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
FEBRUARY 6, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., February 6, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A . Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
The first item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance No. 1;
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-
WAY, THE SAME BEING LOCATED WITHIN VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH
FILING, WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL. The title was read in full by the
Mayor and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance were available.
After some discussion, the Council was polled as to whether they had read
and understood the ordinance. Each member indicated that he had. Council-
man Donovan moved the ordinance be adopted; Councilman Staufer seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and
Dobson voted in favor. The Mayor indicated that the motion carried and the
ordinance was adopted.
The second reading of Ordinance No. 2; AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE
REVIEW OF ALL APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUC-
TION WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAT L, was next on the agenda. The title was
read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance
were available. In the discussion of the ordinance, Mr. Amato expressed
support for the ordinance but pointed out what he found to be mechanical
problems. Asking for working drawings could be unfeasible because of the
economics involved. He would ask that the Council require preliminary plans
only and that the review be made from these. He also expressed concern that
the time periods contemplated presented problems for the developer.
Mr. Amato stated that any plans that were.submitted prior to the final adoption
of the ordinance could not be reviewed. The Mayor disagreed, stating that -the
reviews which have been done were an accommodation to the developer and,
if illegal, could be done again. It was clarified that plans for which an applica-
tion for a building permit had been filed previous to the first reading of the
ordinance were not legally subject to review. Mr. Kindel asked if the Council
were comfortable with the legalities of architectural review; the Mayor
responded that he would like to see it become more of a legal function of the
Town.
Councilman Bailey stated that he would like more clarification on anticipated
revisions of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Robinson replied that if the criteria
for the new zoning ordinance were available, the interim ordinance would not
be needed. This opinion was supported by Councilmen Staufer, Steinberg,
and White. Mr. Minger added that the planning consultants are working on
the zoning ordinance and, as the various sections are available, they will be
enacted.
r?
At this point in the meeting, Bob Royston, a planner from the firm of Royston,
Hanamoto, Beck & Abey, made a short presentation regarding the Town of
Vail Master Plan. Mr. Royston pointed out the tremendous growth rate of
Vail and how his firm is looking at all aspects of the area to determine how
this can be controlled. Mr. Royston also pointed out some specific areas that
the firm is reviewing: 1. the present recreational amenities and the designa-
tion of what recreational needs are not being fulfilled; 2. the present pedestrian
core circulation and possible improvements; 3. a valley-wide bicycle and
hiking trail system; 4. a land-use and development plan for the Antholz property;
5. a possible Interstate noise buffer zone; 6. a better entry into the Town of
Vail; 7. a comprehensive transportation system; and 8. a long-range open
space/greenbelt program. In addition, his firm sees as parts of its task,
assisting an owner in the evaluation of his non-developed land and developing
a reviewing procedure for the evaluation of developments.
Following this presentation, the next item on the agenda was the appointment
of a person to fill the vacancy on the Sign Review Board. Councilman Donovan
moved that David Cole be appointed; Councilman White seconded, approval was
unanimous.
The minutes of the meeting of January 16, 1973, had been previously submitted
to the Council. Councilman Bailey moved they be approved; Councilman
Langmaid seconded; approval was unanimous.
In regard to unauthorized parking on private property, Ted Kindel pointed out
that private parking areas are always full with no means of enforcing the
private nature of these lots. He asked the Council for some legislation that
would provide means of enforcement. No legislation was drafted, but a com-
mittee including Gary Wall, Ted Kindel, Joe Staufer, and Larry Robinson was
appointed to study the problem and propose solutions at the next Council meeting.
Returning to the question of Ordinance No. 2, Mr. Amato presented a proposed
amended Section 4, providing for the review of preliminary plans. Councilman
Donovan moved to include the amendment; Councilman Steinberg seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson
voted in favor of the inclusion. The Council was then polled as to whether they
had read and understood the ordinance, each indicated that he had. Council-
man Donovan moved the ordinance be adopted, as amended, Councilman White
seconded. Councilmen Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and
Dobson voted in favor; Councilman Bailey voted against. The Mayor declared
that the motion carried and the ordinance was adopted.
As there was no further business, the Town Council adjourned at 9:35 p. m.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was convened at 9:40 p.m. A hearing
was held on the application of Henschel Lyon, Ltd. for a retail liquor store
license, the verbatim record of which may be found on tape in the files of the
Town Clerk, Municipal Building, Town of Vail, Vail, Colorado, 81657. Fol-
lowing the hearing on the application, the Mayor informed the applicant that
the Authority will reach a decision within 30 days and the applicant will be
notified by certified mail.
As there was no further business, the Local Liquor Licensing Authority was
adjourned at 12:15 a. m.
P?
1,?-'_XO
Town Clerk
Page 2
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAT L
AND
BOARD OF DIRECTORS/VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 9, 1973
A special joint meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail and the
Board of Directors of the Vail Water and Sanitation District was convened
at 10:10 a. m. , February 9, 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail
Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
The following members of the Board of Directors were present:
John Dobson
Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Eric Edeen, County Sanitarian
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Mr. Minger explained that recently there have been problems in both the
Vail sewer plant and the Upper Eagle Valley plant. The Town has a 3- year
agreement with the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District to send sewage
to the Avon plant where it is treated for 38 cents per 1 ,000 gallons. The
Vail district entered into this agreement rather than expand their plant two
years ago; it is beneficial to UEVS in that they need the revenue and, at
the time, they needed the flows for the efficient operation of the system.
A fact sheet was distributed which indicated the extent to which the system
has been overloaded recently. During this time, the Vail system never
exceeded the state standards for BOD; the standards for, settleable solids and
turbidity were exceeded, however.
There have been some operating difficulties with the Vail plant; in the past
it would treat 750,000 gallons, but lately only 500,000 gallons have been
treated. The Environmental Protection Agency has made some suggestions
for improvement, which we are trying to implement; it might be possible to
have one of their experts make further observations and studies of our system.
Some portable treatment plants with a capacity of 75,000 gallons each might
need to be used. The Avon plant is, likewise, probably not as efficient as
possible.
The proposal from UEVS is that if Vail will sign a contract with them for
continued cooperation, they will expand their plant this summer. It may be
that the District needs to say that if the system is not solved by this summer,
no more taps can be allowed. In addition, the UEVS is willing to enter into
a management agreement with the Town. The Town does have the people and
knowledge to manage this District. However, it would not be a good idea at
this time to try to combine the two districts, due to the poor, financial condi-
tion of UEVS. It might be possible to buy the Bighorn portion from them to
t merge with the Vail District.
. A6
•
1
•
•
Mr. White asked what were the specific.plans for the summer. As portions
of the present Vail plant have the potential capacity of 1,000,000 gallons, an
attempt will be made to build the deficient portions up to this level. This
would enable the plant to accommodate all the construction from last sum-
mer which is not yet tapped on; there are approximately 2100 beds in this
category, assuming 3000 people at 100 gallons per day per person, this
increases current loads by 300,000 gallons. Mr. Rose noted -that if the
District is willing to sign another contract with the UEVSD, Ken Richards
says he can double their plant capacity by the end of the summer.
Councilman Steinberg noted that Senate Bill 35 allows taps onto the lines to
be halted when the capacity is reached. Mr. Minger agreed but the problem
is to define the precise figures for the level at which the plants are overloaded.
After some further discussion, Councilman Staufer suggested that the
$600,000 in unissued bonds of the Water and Sanitation District be used "to
purchase the Bighorn portion of the UEVS system. He was not in favor of
taking on the problems west of Vail, however. Councilman Steinberg dis-
agreed; his feeling was that if the opportunity exists to get a management
contract with the UEVSD, advantage should be taken of it. He also suggested
that an attempt should be made to go to tertiary treatment; a third stage
which removes phosphates and nitrates. Councilman Donovan inquired what
the potential for a lawsuit against the Town or UEVSD is. Mr. Minger felt
that it would be possible that if a person were told that he could not tap onto
the lines, he might sue. A pollution lawsuit might be a possibility, although
the Vail plant is within the rather lenient state standards.
Another item to be considered is the financial one; if the District does not
allow any more taps, the lack of the fee payments might make it impossible
to pay for plant improvements. Councilman Steinberg suggested that in this
case the tap fees might have to be increased.
Further items of discussion were: 1 . to what extent the state pollution standards
vary from the ideal standards; 2. the possibility of a study of the situation by
the Ken R. White Company; 3. the failure of the county to as yet make a deci-
sion on projects which would be tapping onto the UEVSD lines; 4. whether
there is enough land at the Vail plant to permit expansion, a question which was
settled with a qualified affirmative; 5. if a management contract were signed,
the efficiency of the UEVSD plant might be able to be improved; 6. the alter-
natives if Vail could not send a portion of its sewage to Avon; 7. the possibility
of political resentment down-valley if a management agreement were signed,
however, these areas do have representatives on the Board which would have
to make the agreement. Discussion brought out that such a contract should not
cost the Vail Water and Sanitation District taxpayers any money; the UEVSD
has its own mill levy.
Mayor Dobson summarized that it was basically agreed that the Town should
attempt to consolidate the Bighorn area with the Vail district and attempt to
get a management agreement for the areas west of here. Mr.. Minger stated
that another meeting will be held at which the staff can present more detailed
information as to what the options are, what the costs are, and what the time
frame is. The Ken R. White Company will be given approval to begin their
studies and an attempt will be made to obtain the services of a man from the
Environmental Protection Agency.
The meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.
Town Clerk
-11 J 111141
Secret ry
ZUC
Page 2
VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT
RECORD OF FLOWS FROM
NOVEMBER 24, 1972 TO FEBRUARY 5}1973
AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS CALCULATED ON A WEEKLY BASIS
WEEK BEGINNING UEVSD VAIL TOTAL
(rated capacity) I, 000, 000 500,000 11500,000
11 -24-72 6 72, 875 617,250 1, 290,1 2 5
11 - 28 -72 543,428 496, 142 11039,570
12- 5 - 72 62 3,7 14 498,714 I, 122,428
12- 12 - 72 687,857 53 1, 857 11219,714
12- 19 - 72 759,571 588, 142 1,347,713
"' - 26- 72 9 1 5, 857 615, 428 1, 531 , 285
-- 2 - 73 931,428 467,428 11398,856
1 - 9 - 73 851, 857 4 1 3, 142 It 264,999
1 -- 16 - 73 746,428 474,428 11220,856
1 - 23 -73 995,000 226t571 112211,571
1 - 30 -73 758, 142 459,714 11217,856
During this ten and one-half week period the Vail sewage treatment plant exceeded
rated capacity a total of thirty eight days; the UEVS D sewage treatment plant
exceeded rated capacity a total of four days; the total combined system a total of
even consecutive days, a listing of which follows:
12-27-72
12-28-72
12-29-72
12-30-72
12-31-72
l -73
1- 2-73
I, 5 14, o00
It 579,000
I, 576, 000
1,600,000
13556,000
1,569, 000
1,530,000
t
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COU NCI L OF THE TOWN OF VA 1I-
FEBRUARY 20, 1973
A regular meeting of -the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 7:45 p.m., February 20, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present.
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
First to be discussed was the question of the Bighorn annexation. Given
that property annexed must be 1/6 contiguous to the present Town boundaries,
Mr. Minger explained a map which showed the two-step procedure which
would be used to gain this contiguousy. Some non--developable lands would
not be included in these annexations; they could be annexed at a later date.
A fact sheet on the pros and cons of annexation was then discussed. Mr.
Minger noted that the Fire District is not included in this assessment as the
Board of Directors of that District has not yet been contacted to ascertain
their attitudes toward such a plan. Councilman Langmaid noted that as the
Bighorn area has its own fire district at present, this district would have to
be disbanded or in some way incorporated into the Vail District. At present,
the Bighorn District has a contract For fire protection with the Vail District.
In regard to a consolidation of water districts, the Bighorn area would bring
their water rights with them in such a case. Councilman Langmaid inquired
what 'faci I ities would produce the estimated $7,000 additional sales tax. Mr.
Minger indicated that this would come from the lodging facilities plus the
areas covenanted commercial. In response to further questions, Mr. Minger
noted that the estimates of the cost of services in the area are debatable; however,
there are other possible revenues not yet calculated such as funds from the
Road and Bridge Fund. In those areas not yet paved, a special assessment
district would be formed to fund the paving. Any new construction would be
paved as required in the Subdivision Regulations.
The separate operations of the Town and the Districts were explained; this
makes impossible the transfer of funds from one to another. In regard to the
methods by which land for public purposes would be obtained, the stream
tract would be obtained in the annexation procedure; open space and land for
recreational amenities could be obtained in the zoning procedure. Currently,
a negotiated 8 percent of a development is provided For recreational lands.
In addition, if a development Fee were charged, these monies would be placed
in a special amenities fund. A partial list of the developers in the area and
inventory of lands available has been compiled. There are probably 250 to
300 acres still undeveloped.
A member of the audience suggested that the figures being used to determine
the increased taxes on the Bighorn homeowner are too low. He also suggested
that the Town of Vail is not yet meeting its obligations within its own boundaries;
his interest was in how the Town is going to finance the improvements it still
needs. Mr. Minger noted that, in relative terms, the mill levy is inconse-
quential to the financing of the Town. The largest part of the town's revenues
come from the sales tax. The projected amount of money which will be required
to finance parking improvements, cultural amenities, sewer and water improve-
ments, park lands and other improvements is 10 to 12 million dollars. Cur-
rently, the Town could pay for about 4 million dollars. An additional revenue
source, most likely an additional sales tax, will be needed. In any case, such
an amount of money could not be obtained from the property tax.
A member of the audience noted that one important consideration is the For-
mation of a viable community. It is difficult to have a viable community when
large population centers are not included. There was general agreement with
this statement. Mr. Riley, a developer, and resident of the Bighorn area,
endorsed this statement and added that, although there are some disadvantages
to annexation, it is necessary to insure proper controls in the .area. Some
proposed projects in the area are substandard; in order to ensure the quality
of surrounding developments, it is to the developer's advantage to support
annexation.
Mayor Dobson noted that the general purpose of the meeting was philosophical,
to obtain a sense of the Council's attitude toward the proposal. Councilman
White was of the opinion that the annexation should proceed as soon as possible,
whatever planning tools are implemented within the present boundaries are
made less effective if not implemented outside of these boundaries. Councilman
Langmaid was favorable to the proposal, but would like to know how the people
of the present town view the proposal. Councilman Staufer likewise was in
favor and added that he felt the people of Bighorn need representation in the
Town government. Councilmen Donovan, Steinberg and Bailey were also in
favor, adding the comments that the Town might have to assume some extra
costs for the first few years and that it will be difficult to begin negotiations
until the revised zoning ordinance is completed. Mayor Dobson noted that
this ordinance should be completed in 90 to 120. days. Discussion ended with
the comment that the Bighorn residents have received a clear concensus that
the Council is in favor of the annexation.
Ted Kindel, representing the committee on unauthorized parking on private
property, reported that they would ask the Council for an ordinance permitting
the Police Department to ticket cars parking on private property in violation of
specified time periods and date periods. An attempt will be made to install
uniform signs. The burden of everything but the actual writing of the ticket
should rest with the property owner. The program will be evaluated after a
few months of operation. An ordinance will be drafted for the next meeting.
Mr. Dave Gorsuch had submitted his resignation from the Planning Commission.
Councilman Donovan moved this resignation be accepted; Councilman Bailey
seconded; approval was unanimous and the resignation accepted with regret.
The vacancy will be advertised.
Mr. Minger reported on: 1 . the goals and objectives statement which the
Police Department has formulated with the assistance of Dr. Robert Emrich;
2. the proposed open house at the police department; 3. the fact that the
VRA has a presentation it would like to make before the allocation of "dona-
tions to organizations" is made; hence, an informal session will be held with
the VRA and Colorado Rivers Council following the presentation; 4. the
environmental impact study of Vail to be done by the Institue of Arctic and
Alpine Research this summer.
The minutes of the meetings of February 6 and February 5 had been previously
submitted to the Council. Councilman Donovan moved they be accepted;
Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
Councilman White moved the Town Council be adjourned at 9:00 p.m.; Council-
man Bailey seconded, approval of,adjourn.ment was unanimous.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was convened at 9:05 p. m. Mr. White
moved the license for Henschel Lyon, Ltd ..be approved; Mr. Donovan seconded.
Mr. Bailey, Mr. Donovan, Mr. Staufer and Mr. White voted' in favor; Mr.
-2-
Langmaid and Mr. Steinberg voted against. Chairman Dobson declared
that the motion carried and the license was approved.
Mr. Donovan moved the Local Liquor Licensing Authority adjourn at 9.10 p. m.
Mr. Steinberg seconded; approval of adjournment was unanimous.
Town Clerk
i
t
-3-
9
}
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
u
40
OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, in accordance
with the Charter for the Town of Vail, that a special meeting of the
Town Council for the Town of Vail will be held in the Council Room
of the Municipal Building at the hour of 10:00 o'clock a. m. on
Monday, March 5, 1973.
The purpose of the meeting is to discuss various matters
pertaining to applications for building permits for construction within
the Town of Vail, matters pertaining to water and sewer facilities, and
related matters pertaining to building and development policies within
the Town of Vail.
DATED this 28th day of February, 1973, at the hour of
11:30 o'clock a. m.
Z ?
Town Clerk
0
t
t
0vi 0 Vold box 100 • vall, colorado 83657 • 303.476.5613
•
March 2, 1973
TO: TERRY MINDER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGHILL
RE: STAFF REVIEW OF VILLAGE CENTRE
The following recommendations are i
made by
the Town of Vail
Staff after careful review of the proposed project:
_ 1. We feel approval should be given only for building "B"
and that the remainder of the project should be reviewed
under the proposed new zoning ordinanc e and master plan.
2. Temporary parking should be furnished on the site for
Building "A" and building "B" (as shown on site plan)
until such time as pedestrian precinct master plan and
transportation terminal plans are completed and adopted.
At that time we suggest negotiations with Mr. Hibberd
in an attempt to provide all parking in the transporta-
tion terminal or to provide any on site parking below
grade.
3. If approval is given, it should be subject to an approved
landscaping plan for both buildings, with particular
attention to the stream tract.
4. All trash areas should-be screened from view.
5. We suggest that the exterior treatment of the building be
softened by the addition of wood veneer or other suitable
natural material.
a
6. All signs must be approved by the Sign Review Committee.
u ?i? o' ua
•
March 2, 1973
box 1 o o • vail, colorado 81657 • 303.476-5613
TO: TERRY MINGER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGHILL
RE: STAFF REVIEW OF MONTANEROS PHASE II
The following recommendations are made by the Town of Vail Staff
after careful review of the proposed project:
1. We strongly recommend the removal of the attached cv,?unercial
space as. it is not an integral part of the design for the
project.
2. Parking should not be allowed in interior court yard. These
spaces would not be required if the commercial space is removed.
Heavy landscaping could then be provided in this court yard
which should be pedestrian oriented.
3. It is also suggested that parking be removed from the north
side of the building and that a parking concession for approxi-
mately 10 spaces be granted so parking can be removed from the
south side of building adjacent to tract land.
4. Final approval should be subject to an approved landscaping
plan.
5.. We feel decorative screening could be provided for underground
parking on both existing and proposed structures so that cars
are less visible from the pedestrian areas.
,.
0.
OV'i10. V21. i
•
x
box too . vail, Colorado 81657 . 303.476.5613
March 2, 1973
Staff Review
Page 2
6. It is suggested that alternate treatment of foundation areas
on both structures could be used to hide the unsightly concrete
foundation walls. We would suggest a natural material such as
moss rock.
7. A children's play area could be incorporated into the central
court.
8. All signs must be approved by the Sign Review Committee.
?J
r
.Uk10 B., Vol'.
•
01.
March 2, 1973
t
q
box 1 o0 . vaiI, coiorado 81657 * 303 • 476.561 3
TO: TERRY MINGER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGHILL
RE: STAFF REVIEW OF VILLA CORTINA
The following recommendations are made by the Town of-Vail Staff
after careful review of the proposed project:
Since the parking area is completely heated and snow storage
will not be a problem, we suggest that they be allowed to use
parking spaces 91 x 18' with a 24' aisle. This would allow
the parking to be moved back from the property line 3' so that
landscaping could be incorporated into the area south of the
Fire Station.
2. Planter boxes could be used to efficiently break up the parking
area, particularly in the summer when less parking is being
used.
3. We suggest that the retaining walls adjacent to the ramp to
underground parking be treated with stone, brick or other de-
corative material to relieve the monotony of large expanses of
asphalt. Parking in the above grade parking could be screened
by adding a small wooden fence to the top of the retaining wall.
4. 1f clear-any ?,?,al-atscou-ld--be---incorporated
A)ve ' d sort-ion--£f the_-. 'ALP -F•.rL-- S
? ]12G:r?{U-Q?a? {???)?LrtW1
5. Heavy landscaping should be concentrated in the area adjacent
to the green belt area.
+ 1?
.0 C.., Coal.
March 2, 1973
b o x l o o • v a i E , co l o r a d o 8 1 6 5 7 • 3 0 3. 4 7 6. 5 6 1 3
TO: TERRY MINDER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGHILL
RE: STAFF REVIEW OF LIONSHEAD LODGE ADDITION
The following recommendations are made by the Town of Vail. Staff
after careful review of the proposed project:
1. Landscaping plan should be approved, with emphasis on the area
around the entry and adjacent to the green belt area.
2. We suggest that. some type of brick paving or similar material
be used in the entry area to create interest in this area.
3. Letter of approval from Vail Associates for ingress and egress
for driveway on Tract I must be obtained.
4. A children's play area could be?incorporated into the land-
scaped area on the south side of the building.
5. If a retaining wall is used adjacent to the parking ramp, we
suggest it be treated with some type of stone or other natural
material.
6. Since Tracts I and J have been set aside for the drainage ease-
ment, drives should be designed to provide for surface water.
7. All signs must be approved b.y the Sign Review Committee.
?r - ,,,, r, in ,? „do?z-treatment
$. Rte, s?e?t?t?n--eould--be-?? „?:en ? 3?•-.-u?. g--?' ,
Ily
i i
vo ?t Va
•
•
box ioa + rail, colorado 31667 . 303.476.5613
'March 2, 1973
TO: TERRY MINDER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGHILL
RE: STAFF REVIEW OF VAIL INTERNATIONAL
The following recommendations are made by the Town of Vail Staff
after careful review of the proposed project:
1. We recommend that a parking concession for eight cars be granted
so that parking would not be necessary on the east portion of
site adjacent to Middle Creek. This area could then be heavily
landscaped to screen parking area from green belt.
2. Landscaping should be increased toward Middle Creek and approval
should be subject to an approved landscaping plan.
3. Attention should be brought to the fact that the southwest
corner of the building is approximately 111from a 12" water
main. The building is legal as situated, but the water line
could be damaged in the process of construction and if possible
building should be relocated.
4. All signs must be approved by the Sign Review Committee.
5. Landscaping should be used to screen parking from view from the
Frontage Road. This could be accomplished by using heavy land-
scaping toward the west entrance and by planting along the Fron-
tage Road in cooperation with the State Highway Department.
r
1 1 V8
is March 7, 1973
Y
box 100 . Vail, colorado 81657 • 303.476.5613
TO: TERRY MINDER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGNILL
RE: STAFF REVIEW OF SNOWBIRD LODGE AN'^ S I P.? I [d I UPf?
Snowbird Lodqe
The Town staff feels that this is the type of project the Town
Council has been attempting to avoid through the design review
process. We feel that this type of project should be discouraged
and we would like to bring to your attention the facts that make
this project undesirable.
1. The building exceeds the F.A.R. by 1752 s u ?A f.,Qt Wr-.aRproxi-
ma+plv c?ss77-57-3 c? iII?i 0dVCiu?r?r awNi y for a
zero setback variance at the east ana weST proyeriy H-pes.
2. Developer also applied for, and received, a variance from the
Uniform Building Code to allow openings.(doors, windows, etc.)
closer than 3f from property lines.
3. Parking variance has been applied for as spaces measure only
91 x 18' with a 24' aisle. There are only 70 spaces provided
and 78 are required by present parking ordinance.
4. Proposed deck to Gondola building will not be permitted as it
crosses a major utility easement. This is prohibited also by
protective covenant. Deck would exclude fire equipment from
the Gondola building as this is the only existing fire access.
T-be re i s a I zu a Yc3s' h i I ? +,1 of th i
for thT-F-iR2--__p-g7 -F I n the nrqHez- .tea .
5 We ques't' Tt?ii IIu#-zreea i n -a- Ile r K. as it-+-s_._set
6 0 v e 5 n1 r* : +? `ter A ?.._ b y b?4? n g an d N a r7 i t i g a4-1- o4i4m:?,g
8 I invs I ^fi-? I - nrlcl'7 -44 e .' e.
7. Any approval for this project should be subject to an approved
landscaping plan and all signs are subject to review by Sign
Review Committee.
1 ?
)k'lll l` Vn ?
•
March 2, 1973
Y
box loo • Vail, Colorado 81657 • 303.476-5613
TO:' TERRY MINGER
TOWN COUNCIL
PLANNING COMMISSION 71 L
FROM: KENT ROSE
JIM LAMONT
DIANA TOUGHILL
RE: CONOCO ADDITION
The following recommendations are made by the Town of Vail
Staff after careful review of the proposed project:
1. Approval is subject to an approved landscaping plan.
Conoco has agreed to provide any landscaping which we
might require. <:::15-T i? VL.,,XLrT ,e-7
f--)-- a ?Q 4ad hua_.-.& won
Cher trcT.o_..._ e. wessdifw't?ie..co.
3. A hipped roof is suggested in lieu of the roof detail
proposed so that it will be compatible with existing
building.
.F. Exterior walls should be of similar material as existing
building.
5. Fencing at least 6' tall should be provided to screen
car, storage area from view. It is suggested that a com-
bination of stone or brick and wood be used for the fences.
6. -Sign must be approved by the Sign Review Committee.
7. Only one bay should be allowed to open to the frcnt and the
overhead door for this bay should be treated with some type
of stained :-rood to harmonize with exterior of building.
D
" f
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
AND
BOARD OF DIRECTORS/VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
MARCH 5, 1973
i
A special joint meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail and the
Board of Directors of the Vail Water and Sanitation District was convened
at 10:30 a.m., March 5, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following . Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg Gerry White
The following members of the Board of Directors were present:
John Dobson Ted Kindel
Josef Staufer Gerry White
The following representatives of the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District
were present:
John A mato Fred Green
Lee Whiteman
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Kent Rose, Town Ehgineer
Eric Edeen, Town Sanitarian
Pete Burnett, Street Superintendent
Tony Rossi, Sewer Plant Superintendent
Mr. Minger explained that the Ken R. White Company had been engaged to
study the ability of the two districts to treat sewage and provide water in
both the short and long term. Mr. Dasel Hallmark, a representative of
that firm, explained that population, both current and projected, is a very
important variable in their study. In the future, the largest growth will
take place downstream from Vail at a rate of approximately 2,000 people
per year. The sewage flow records for the Vail Plant for 1972 indicate that
the peak was in June; a time not in line with either population or water
consumption. Likewise, at 4:00 a. m. , when there is little water consumption
and hence, should be little sewage generated, the flow records still show a
rather heavy flow. These factors point to infiltration of the lines. Some
graphs which attempted to separate the amount of the flow that is actual sewage
from that which is infiltration were explained. Some of the figures used to
make the projections are that average daily consumption is around 100 gallons
per person, with 80% of the water finally going through the sewage treatment
plant.
The operations of the Vail sewer plant were explained. - Parts of the plant are
capable of going above 1 million gallons per day. One important factor is to
be able to adjust the operation to changes in flow. . It was recommended that
enough equipment be acquired to allow these adjustments. When the adjust-
ments are made,. the current clarifier will handle 750,000 gallons. In order
to go to 1 million, an additional clarifier needs.to be added. In order to
design the clarifier, a decision must be made on the approach to be taken
toward infiltration. The design would vary depending upon the type of flow
going through the plant. In order to expand the Vail plant to 2 million gallons,
an aeration system would be required.
Currently the Vail and Avon plants have a combined capacity of 1.5 million
gallons. The operation of the Avon plant was explained. The size of their
clarifier limits the plant to 800,000 gallons per day. If this were improved,
the capacity would be 1.2 million. Additional suggestions were that: 1.
the aerobic digestor is too small; 2. a skimming device is needed; 3. the
• plant, with the exception of the sludge beds, needs to be covered in order
to assure proper temperature. The Avon p lant also needed to acquire more
laboratory equipment. It was suggested that when the sludge beds cannot
be used, a septic tank truck be used to transport the waste either to Vaii
or to a landfi l I.
A member of the group asked if Mr. Hallmark thought the work done last
summer in the Bighorn area would be effective against the infiltration. Mr.
Hallmark indicated that the flow records show when the work was done;
hence, it might have been effective. Normal infiltration is 200 gallons per
mile of line. Excess infiltration can be located by measurements between
manholes or by using TV equipment in the lines. When found, the lines
can either be sealed at the key points or plastic liners can be placed in
the lines. Councilman Steinberg inquired if the Vail system had experienced
much infiltration prior to the construction of the UEVS system; Mr. Burnett
indicated that there had been very little.
Mr. Minger summarized that the steps to be taken by the Vail district are :
1 . the halting of infiltration; 2. the operation of the plant more efficiently;
3. the addition of baffles and a concret wall, bringing the capacity to
750,000 gallons with a potential for a million gallons for short periods;
4. the addition of a clarifier to bring the capacity to 1 million gallons with
a peak-period capacity of 1.5 million gallons. These improvements could
be completed by next December. Mr. Hallmark suggested that it is neces-
sary to decide to what extent the two plants are going to be viewed as an
integral system. Mr. Minger suggested that the EPA is involved in this
decision. Mr. Amato, speaking for the UEVSD, noted that they have arranged
for a bond issue to provide funds for the lab equipment, skimmer and cover
for the plant. They are prepared to spend $100,000 to further curtail infil-
tration this summer. The extent of the work to be done will not be known
until the spring, when the effects of last summer's work can be assessed.
Mr. Minger asked, based on the Vail plant expanding to 1.2 million and the
Avon plant to 2 million, if that would handle the valley's problems. Mr.
Hallmark noted that that would take care of the situation until 1976. If the
Avon plant only expanded to 1 .1 million, the situation would still be in control
until 1975, if 80% of the infiltration were stopped. He recommended that
before any major work is done on either plant, the long-range solutions be
considered. Councilman. Staufer inquired if it were sensible to operate two
separate systems, with Vail and Bighorn in one. Mr. Hallmark indicated
that a major expansion of the Vail plant would have to be undertaken if that
were the case. Mr. Kindel asked if ttertiary treatment would be necessary
by 1978. Mr. Hallmark suggested that the District begin looking toward this
type of system. One advantage would be that the water could then be re-used.
Mr. Green noted that the UEVSD, was planning no major expansion for the
forthcoming summer, but would expand in 1974.
Discussion turned to the problem of the amount of sewerage generated by new
construction in Vail during the forthcoming summer and whether the plants
can handle this additional flow. Discussion also centered on the expansion of
areas east and west of Vail. Mr. Hallmark noted that they are projecting
16,000 people for both plants by the end of 1973. Mr. Amato noted that the
UEVSD is prepared to do those things necessary to improve the Avon plant
and stop infiltration. In the long-range planning, Mr. Amato preferred the
cooperative approach between the two plants. Mr. Kindel expressed his
cCn cern that the clarifier cannot be designed until the extent to which the
infiltration problem has been solved has been determined. Mr. Hallmark
noted that the clarifier could be built in August and September after the deter-
mination is made of the infiltration in May and June. He estimated that the
cost of a clarifier would be less than $100,000. Mr. White moved that the
corrective measures be taken in the Vail plant and that work on the clarifier
be undertaken; Mr. Staufer seconded; Mr. Dobson,. Mr. Kindel, Mr. Staufer,
-2-
a
1
and Mr. White voted in favor; the motion carried.
Mr. Staufer asked Mr. Amato how he felt about the Vail district purchasing
the Bighorn portion from the UEVSD. Mr. Amato indicated that they would
be willing to cooperate; however, they have some financial problems that
would necessitate a study of the effect of selling some of their customers
before a decision could be made. Mr. Dobson suggested that it was also
necessary for the Vail board to determine what the long-range solution is
going to be before making an offer to purchase.
Mr. Hallmark noted that the presentation which he had made would be put
into a written form. Mr. Minger stated that a meeting would be held when
this report was available and exact costs and reports on the measures taken
will be presented. The report on the water system will be available by
mid-summer.
As there was no further business, the joint meeting of the Vail Water and
Sanitation District and the Town Council was adjourned at 12:45 p.m.
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
1:00 p.m., March 5, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg Gerry White
Terry Minger, Town Manager, was also present.
In regard to the amount of growth to be expected in the forthcoming year,
Councilman Bailey derived the figure of 2,200 additional people. That
figure did not include Landmark and the Tennis Club as they will not be
occupied until 1974. It was also pointed out that this figure did not include
projects currently under construction, from which the impact has not yet
been felt. Councilman White suggested that the real question is whether
the Master Plan will apply to Vail before or after the forthcoming construc-
tion season. Mayor Dobson noted that portions of it, the amenity fee, the
landscaping bond, etc., will apply; the remainder probably will not apply
this season. Councilman White differed in that he felt a greater portion
of the proposed ordinance could be put into effect in a shorter time span.
Returning to the question of buildings constructed, but not yet occupied,
there was general agreement that virtually nothing is being occupied that
was built last summer. The effect is that the impact being considered is
much greater than the figure of 2,200.
Mayor Dobson suggested that the. Council attempt to isolate the factors that
make an increase of 2,500 people a matter of concern. He asked first if it
were a matter of the skiing. Councilman White stated that he felt the experi-
.
ence would be significantly harmed; Councilmen Langmaid and Donovan agreed.
In regard to additional areas of concern, Councilman White noted that he was
concerned about summer recreation; currently, the golf course is probably
meeting only 50% of the need and the tennis courts about 33% of the need. In
addition, there are the visual effects of the construction which it was agreed
would lessen the appeal of the resort. There was also the air pollution
problem to be considered. Additional areas of concern were the parking and
transportation pressure, the employee housing pressure and the pressure
on the school system from the children of these employees. Councilman
Staufer suggested that there was an economic effect of dumping condominiums
on the market. Councilman Donovan suggested that it is also necessary to
consider the impact of the day skier. The discussion was summarized as the
Council is concerned about the quality of the resort: skiing; summer recrea-
tion; parking and transportation; pollution; visual aspects; school impact;
crowding; and economic conditions.
r
Mayor Dobson asked what the positive aspects of growth would be. Vail
' Associates is concerned that the reputation of Vail in financial circles will
be seriously damaged by restrictions on growth. Mr. Minger expressed his
concern that if the Council overreacts to growth, the ability to finance 10 to
12 million dollars of public amenities will be endangered. In addition, it
might be difficult to sell the bonds if the town has the reputation of being
unstable. Councilman Langmaid suggested that more support would be gained
if growth were stopped. Mr. Minger indicated that the question is not whether
growth is stopped, but how it is done; whether existing commitments are
honored. After some further discussion, Councilman White interpreted Mr.
Minger to mean, let the currently-planned building go ahead and the ordinance
take effect through normal procedures. Mr. Minger acknowledged that this
was correct with the addition that some changes should be made, like the
development fee. Councilman Staufer agreed, considering that developers
might be forced to East and West Vail by too sudden action and also that it
might endanger the Bighorn annexation. In further discussion, general agree-
ment was reached that an attempt should be made to purchase a portion of the
Hibberd lot, although this approach could not be used in other cases.
Councilman Donovan inquired as to the policy on phased projects if they attempt
to build the entire project this season so as to avoid the effects of the new
ordinance. Mayor Dobson did not see this as a possibility as the elements
of the new ordinance will be available in a relatively short time and it would
not be possible to review all stages this year, as it seems unrealistic for a
developer to expect approval three years in advance. Councilman Bailey
added that the approach being discussed would enable those developers with
phased projects to anticipate the rules that will apply to their latter stages.
Mr. Minger suggested that the Council should cut off, review of projects at
some point. Mayor Dobson noted that it is unlikely that any projects remain
to be reviewed for the forthcoming season. He added that a statement should
be issued stating that those people who have applied for a permit or submitted
plans for review have to a certain time to finish. Beyond that date., any plans
will be held for the new ordinance. Discussion ensued of what date would be
acceptable. Mr. Minger suggested that the new ordinance would be ready by
April 1; hence, this could be the cut off date and no other plans could be
reviewed after this date as the new ordinance is being reviewed. Councilman
Staufer proposed a motion which included an automatic disapproval if the
project required a variance. Councilman Bailey objected as he felt it was
singling out only one pli6ject. In further discussion, Mayor Dobson proposed
that April 1 be the deadline for plans, that June i.;be,the deadline for working
drawings. Councilman White moved that, plans received by April 1 will be
reviewed; after April 1, all reviews will cease. He further moved .that if the
project does not have an application for a building permit submitted by June 1
(having been reviewed by April 1) they will not come under the old , ordinance.
Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen White, Bailey, Donovan, Staufer,
Steinberg and Dobson voted in favor; Councilman Langmaid voted against; the
motion carried.
There was general agreement that an ordinance establishing a recreational
fee should be passed before approval is given to any of the projects. The
facilities for which it should be used and the types of construction which
should pay were further discussed. Mr. Robinson.noted that it would be
difficult to tie the fee to the occupancy permit as the issuance of a building
permit implies that the occupancy permit will follow if the building code has
been followed. There was general agreement that the credit should be considered
and the fee should be $1 .00 per square foot. The staff was instructed to draft
the ordinance.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:15 p.m.
MINUTES
REGU l_.AR MEETING
TOWN COUNCI L OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
MARCH 6, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., March 6, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
The meeting was first convened in joint session with the Boards of Directors.
of the Vail Water and Sanitation District and the Upper Eagle Valley Sanita-
tion District.
The following members of the Vail Water and Sanitation District were present:
John Dobson
Ted Kindel
Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Mr. John Amato, of the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District, was also
present.
Mr. Minger explained that a study of the=sewerage systems of the area had
been undertaken by the Ken R. White Company. Mr. Dasel Hallmark of that
company was present to review their findings. Mr. Hallmark explained that
three important variables in such a study are population, infiltration, and
the actual amount of sewage. Population can be used to project the amount
of sewage which should be generated; if the flow records indicate that a larger
amount is being processed, the difference indicates the amount of infiltration.
The elimination of infiltration in effect increases the. capacity of the plant to
treat actual sewage. The peak Flow in 1972 for the combined Vail and Avon
plants occurred in June and was 2.2 million gallons. The Vail plant will
currently accommodate 750,000 gallons; it is limited by the size of its clarifier.
The Avon plant is currently limited to 800,000 gallons. They have recommended
that both plants obtain enough laboratory equipment to properly operate the
facilities. In addition, they have suggested that a schedule of operation be
established For both plants. For the Avon plant they have recommended that
portions of the operation be covered, that a skimming device be added to the
clarifier, and that an automatic .re-set be installed on the aerator. In the
Vail plant, a measuring device on the return pipe has been suggested as well
as a concret wall in one of the tanks. To increase by a larger amount the
capacity of the Vail plant, the addition of a clarifier has been suggested. This
would bring it to 1.2 million gallons.
Mr. Minger indicated that, in addition to this study, an expert in stream health
has been retained to study the operation. He also noted that the District is
• prepared to add a clarifier this summer. In regard to infiltration, it is pos-
sible that some of it was halted through the work done by the UEVSD last
summer. This District is prepared. to spend up to $100,000 to further correct
the problem. Mr. Minger noted that the EPA is going to study the two plants
and suggest steps to be taken for the long-term solution of the problems. It
•
i
•
•
may be necessary to install tiertiary treatment facilities to meet the 1978
standards. In essence, Mr. Minger felt that any sewer problem which
currectly exists in the area can be solved this summer. Mr. Amato expres-
sed his opinion that the cooperation between the two districts has improved
greatly and that, in the future, a regional approach should be considered.
Mr. Ken Richards added that the capacity of the two plants by the end of the
forthcoming construction season will be 2 million gallons and that further
expansion will be considered for the 1974-75 season. The 2 million gallon
capacity would service a population of 20,000. As there was no further busi-
ness, the join meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
A resolution had been prepared setting forth the Council's policy on future
design reviews. This resolution was read in full. Mayor Dobson explained
that the intent was to allow time for projects to be reviewed which are planned
for the forthcoming construction season but which have not yet been presented
to the Council. Projects which are reviewed under this resolution will be
basically under the old guidelines. The hearings on the new zoning ordinance
will begin around April 1. After some further discussion, Councilman
Donovan moved the resolution be adopted; Councilman Steinberg seconded.
Mr. Amato questioned whether,the resolution was legal; Mayor Dobson
indicated that the Council would be sensitive to these matters. Mr. Robinson
added that the reason for passing this resolution was to forewarn the developer
of a situation, the passing of a new ordinance., which would occur without the
resolution and which might cause him some expense. In response to the com-
ment that there is a practical difficulty of getting working drawings in 30 days,
Councilman Bailey suggested that, for all practical purposes, all major projects
for the forthcoming season have been s ub mitted, and, hence, have a longer time.
It was noted that most of the projects submitted to date have already been through
architectural control. The vote on the previous motion adopting the resolution
was unanimous.
Next to be considered was a proposed ORDINANCE CREATING THE TOWN OF
VAIL RECREATIONAL FUND; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF
RECREATIONAL FEES AS A CONDITION OF ISSUING BUILDING PERMITS;
ALLOWING A CREDIT AGAINST SAID RECREATIONAL FEES; PROVIDING
FOR PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTING AND DISBURSING FUNDS; SPECIFY-
ING PURPOSES FOR WHICH SUCH FUNDS MAY BE EXPENDED; AND
PROVIDING MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, The title
of the ordinance was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that
copies were available. The Mayor explained that the feeling of the Council
was that the amount of growth proposed presents recreational needs that are
not being met by private developers. Mr. Slifer objected that the'fees were
too high, particularly in residential districts, and that the citizens should have
a voice in how the funds were spent. Councilman Donovan responded that as
the ordinance requires that the expenditure of funds be authorized by an ordi-
nance, this would necessitate public hearings. Mr. Lapin suggested that rather
than saying "the Town Council may determine other appropriate purposes,"
the wording should be expanded to "other appropriate purposes for expendi-
tures in the area of recreational amenities." There was general agreement
that this wording should be used. Mr. Lapin also objected to the various
categories of assessment; he felt these could create a situation of double
taxation. There was not agreement with this idea. Mr. Riley suggested that
the Council view this proposal in relation to its effect on the Bighorn annexa-
tion proposal. He also objected that.th? credits were not large enough and the
fee too high. Another member of the audience suggested that the credit system
did not work as an incentive to the developer to build amenities; surely this
was the intent of the Council. Mr. Amato concurred that the effect of the fee
would be to preclude annexation of outlying areas, yet the people generated
by these areas would use the facilities of the Town. He also suggested that
the fee should be collected at the time of the occupancy permit, rather than
the building permit. An additional suggestion was that construction in "A"
areas should be exempted as most construction in these areas is recreational
in character. Mr. Amato also objected that persons who have had their build-
ing permits withheld for Design Review would be subject to the fee due to this
withholding. Mayor Dobson interjected that each developer has been informed
-2-
in the Design Review sessions that such a fee is anticipated. Mr. Nott
suggested that, as the ordinance is written, it discourages open space;
that dedicated land should be given a credit. Mr. Parker inquired how
much money would be derived from the fee. Mr. Minger stated that over
the next 3 or 4 years, it would be $700,000 to $800,000. Mayor Dobson
added that in the 18 to 20 million dollars worth of plans that they have
viewed, with the exception of one project, no amenities have been provided.
In further discussion, Councilman Steinberg suggested that an alternative
means of obtaining revenue would be to impose a use tax. He also sug-
gested that the inequity of old property owners in newly annexed areas avoid-
ing the fee would be eliminated if the County would extend the same policy to
areas under their jurisdiction. In regard to the credit system, Mr. Minger
suggested that developer-built amenities can never replace public ones,
hence, no one should be totally exempt from a contribution to the fund. Mr.
Nott suggested that, as a land developer, amenities provided by this actor
are included within the land cost; hence, -there should be a credit for the
incremental cost of recreational amenities provided by the land developer.
Mr. Hibberd suggested that the fee should be on a graduated scale; low this
year and gradually increasing. His further suggestions were: 1 . that land
designated as public parks should be given credit; 2. that the Town Council
should not decide what recreational amenities are given credit; 3. that the
monies raised should also be available for transportation. An additional
„suggestion from the floor wasthat floor area is not adequately defined.
Mayor Dobson suggested that it would not be possible to reach a decision
at this meeting. He added that any suggestions or comments are welcome
and should be in writing.
Ordinance No. 3, AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING UPON OR WITHIN
PRIVATE PARKING LOTS OR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT THE CONSENT
OF THE OVW ER THEREOF OR PERSON IN POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF
SAID PRIVATE PARKING LOT OR PROPERTY; IMPOSING CERTAIN REQUIRE-
MENTS UPON THE OWNER OR PERSON IN POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF
PRIVATE PARKING LOTS OR PROPERTY; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE
VIOLATION THEREOF; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN
RELATION THERETO was introduced by Councilman Staufer. The title was
read in full by Mayor Dobson and the audience advised that copies were avail-
able. Mr. Kindel, as a member of the committee which had recommended
the ordinance, emphasized that it is important for the private property owner
to realize his obligations under the ordinance. The Mayor polled the Council
as to whether they had read and understood the ordinance; Councilmen White,
Langmaid, Staufer, Bailey, Donovan and Steinberg each indicated that he had.
Councilman White moved that. Ordinance No. •3 be approved on first reading
. and be published for public hearing at the next regular meeting. Councilman
Bailey seconded the motion. Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, Langmaid,
Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor of the motion. The Mayor indicated
that the motion carried and instructed the Town Clerk to publish Ordinance No. 3.
Ordinance No. 4, AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE ACCUMULATION OF
REFUSE, GARBAGE, RUBBISH AND RUBBLE; REQUIRING CONTAINERS
FOR THE STORAGE OF REFUSE; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR REQUIR-
ING COMPLIANCE; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO,
was introduced by Councilman Steinberg. The title was read in full by Mayor
Dobson and the audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Minger
explained that the current ordinance poses problems in terms of its enforce-
ment by the Health Officer. Some suggested changes were: 1 , that the term
"employee" be stricken from Sections 2 and 3; 2. that the term "alley" be
clarified to mean "public alley;" 3. that the prohibition from placing refuse
in public streets be clarified to except litter receptacles; 4. that the duty
to provide containers be expanded to the duty to provide or have available.
There was a suggestion for first, second and third warnings; however, this
was not found to be acceptable. Rather, the person is given a notice and a
reasonable amount of time to correct the situation. Mr. Lapin of the Eagle
Valley Trash Service indicated that he sees no problems with the ordinance.
The Council was polled as to whether -they had read and understood the ordinance;
each indicated that he had. Councilman Donovan moved that Ordinance No. 4
be approved on first reading and be published for public hearing at the next
-3--
¦
regular meeting; Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor. The Mayor
indicated that the motion carried and instructed the Town Clerk to publish same.
Mr. Minger explained that the concept of locally originated TV programming
is to provide a means to communicate issues, events, meetings, etc. It is
hoped that a public access channel can be gained from the cable television
company. A volunteer group is currently working on a series of half hour
programs. The first of these programs will be aired as "Sunday Surprise,"
at 5 p. m. on Channel 6 on March 11 . Mr. Minger pointed out that the
attempt is being made to minimize undue political influence on the program-
ming; hence, the group will function under the directorship of -the Vail Institute.
The group will present a list of their equipment needs in the near future.
The minutes of the meetings of February 9 and February 20 had been previously
submitted to the Council. Councilman Langmaid moved they be accepted;
Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
In order to proceed with plans for the parking structure and transportation
terminal, it was necessary to sign a contract for architectural services
with Mr. Ream. There was some discussion of the terms of the contract;
Councilman Bailey indicated that he found them reasonable. Councilman
White moved that the signing of the contract with Mr. Ream be approved;
Councilman Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous. In response to a
question regarding the uses to be included in the parking structure, Mr.
Minger noted that March 28 there is going to be a public unveiling of the
conceptual plans for the facility. Prior to this date, the plans will be on
display, along with the Ginkelvan, in the plaza north of the Covered Bridge.
Following the March 28 gathering, there will also be public hearings. Mayor
Dobson suggested that in regard to the concepts to be included in the prelimin-
ary plans, the planning commission, the study committee, and the planners
who have been hired have been consulted. Also, there has been much formal
and informal discussion in the community of a parking structure.
A count of the informal ballots submitted in order to select a new member to
the Planning Commission from the list of applicants indicated that Hans
Weibel had been elected to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Minger acknowledged receipt of a letter from the Leaveli Development
Company, offering a counter proposal for the purchase of the property com-
monly known as the Antholz property. This topic will be discussed in more
detail at the next meeting.
In response to a question regarding the trash franchise, Mr. Minger suggested
that it is necessary for the Council to determine priorities in these matters.
Mr. Elias suggested that the Cable TV franchise should be considered first.
Mayor Dobson reminded the Council that there would be a meeting at 10:00 a. m.
on Wednesday, March 7.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the meeting
adjourn at 11:25 p.m.; approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk `
•
-4-
1
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
MARCH 7, 1973
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
10:15 a.m., March 71 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg (present for the last portion of the meeting)
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator
Bob Clark, Chairman, Planning Commission
16 Hans Weibel, Member, Planning Commission
Jen Wright, Member, Planning Commission
Mr. Clancy, a developer, was present to request that his firm be allowed
until July 1, 1973, to submit working drawings. Councilman White expressed
his opinion that the Council is especially concerned about a third core, which.
is Mr. Clancy's project. It would be desirable that the new zoning ordinance
be applied to this project. Mr. Clancy stated that the new zoning ordinance
will not address itself to his project, as, in his opinion, the project requires
a P. U. D. approach, whi ch the new ordinance is not anticipated to.provide.
Mr. Minger noted that he had doubts about this omission and the matter is
not yet settled. In regard to the current ordinance, Mr. Clancy's project
deviates in that one building may.cross zone lines, . in that the parking for one
zone may be in another zone and in some of the setback requirements. He
was of the opinion that they would need a variance either under the new or old
ordinance. Agreement was reached to meet with Mr. Clancy's group on
Friday, March 9, at 4:00 p.m.
In regard to the Hibberd Village Centre project, Councilman Donovan stated
that the height of the building was unacceptable, especially at the entrance to
the village. Mr. Hibberd replied that he had already sold units on all floors;
also, that the building is almost two stories below grade, thereby minimizing
the appearance of height. He indicated that he is willing to build a park on a
portion of his land. Councilman White concurred that the height might be
offensive; however, he doubted that the Council has the power to require it to
be changed. Councilman White moved that Village Centre, Building B, be
approved, conditioned upon cooperation in following the recommendations of
the Town staff; Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen Staufer and Donovan
voted against approval; Councilmen White, Bailey, and Dobson voted in favor
of approval. The motion carried.
The applicability of the proposed recreation fee to projects given approval
would depend on the point at which the ordinance provided for the fee to be
assessed. The general concensus was that it would be assessed at the time
the building permit is issued. However, in any case, it could not be written
so as to apply to Mr. Hibberd's project as his plans have been checked and
are ready for a permit. Mr. Hibberd had some suggestions in regard to this
fee: 1 . the floor area should be the area within the perimeter walls of the
unit; 2. the charge for residential construction should be 20 cents the first
year and 30 cents thereafter; 3. for commercial construction the fee should
be 50 cents the first year and 75 cents -thereafter; 4. the land cost should
be excluded from the credit provision unless the land is in a dedicated public
park, in which case 75% of the land cost to the developer should be given
credit; 5. the up-to-50% of the fee credit should be on a dollar for dollar
basis; 6. the items that are given credit should be listed and specified,
even as to costs; the monies should be allowed to be used for transportation;
7. the Town Council should not be as directly involved in the determination
of credits as the ordinance implies. Mr. Hibberd indicated that he would
agree to pay a 50 cent assessment the first year and 75 cent assessment
the following years. Further discussion brought out: 1 . that the developer
should be allowed 9 months to pay the assessment in full and 2. that there
is a 20% difference in the floor area proposed in the ordinance and the
definition of floor area offered by Mr. Hibberd. Councilman Bailey asked
that Mr. Hibberd put his agreement to pay the recreation 'fee into writing;
Mr. Hibberd agreed to do this.
Next on the agenda was the Montaneros Phase II project. Ms. Toughi ll noted
that Mr. Jim Pierce had basically agreed with the staff recommendations. In
response to the recreation fee, an attorney for the group noted that the prices
have already been listed with the SEC and this might make it difficult to change
them to reflect the added assessment. Mr. Minger.noted that this group is 3 or
4 weeks from the building permit stage. After some further discussion, the
representative for the group noted that they substantially agree with the recom-
mendations and will respond more definitively within a couple of days. Council-
man White moved that the project be approved and the staff instructed to
16 continue negotiating with them for the achievement of the recommendations.
Mr. Lamont noted that if a major conflict occurred over the recommendations,
the Council would be consulted. Councilman Bailey seconded the motion.
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor, the
motion carried.
Mr. John Eden, representing Villa Cortina, noted that they have just finished
working drawings and are 4 or 5 weeks from a building permit; hence, they
would come under the recreation fee. Mr. Lamont noted that an additional
recommendation was for a drainage system at the property owners' expense.
Councilman Staufer moved that Villa Cortina be approved with continued
negotiation of the recommendations; Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor, the motion
carried.
In regard to the Lionshead Lodge addition, Mr. Lamont noted that an additional
recommendation was to eliminate four parking spcaes and provide more land-
scaping at the entrance to the building . Councilman White moved that Lionshead
Lodge addition be approved with negotiation on the recommendations, especially
parking. Councilman Staufer seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer,
White and Dobson voted in favor, the motion carried.
John Eden explained that Phase 1 of the Tennis Club was designed for heavy
summer use; hence, the plans were to complete the drawings in the summer
and build through the winter. He asked whether Phase 1 would come under
the new ordinance in this case. Councilman White suggested that the new
ordinance would not enforce many changes in this project. Councilman
Donovan noted that it would be difficult to make exceptions to the June 1
deadline. It was suggested that if there are substantial changes in the plans,
they be presented for design review again.
Mr. Lamont explained that the representatives of Vail International have
reacted favorably to the staff recommendations. A pedestrian bridge that
had been mentioned would have to be approved by the Council as it would be
on tract land. Councilman White moved that the Vail international be approved
with staff negotiation of the recommendations; Councilman Bailey seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor, the
motion carried.
-2-
l
w
Prior to the consideration of Snowbird Lodge, Councilman Steinberg joined
the meeting. Councilman Staufer moved Snowbird Lodge be disapproved on
the grounds that it exceeds the F.A. R. , that it needs a parking variance, and
also a setback variance. It was explained -that the building does not exceed the
F.A.R. if the interpretation is made that the conference rooms in the base-
ment are not included in the floor area; an interpretation given by Mr. Minger
and Mr. Robinson. Councilman Donovan seconded disapproval on the basis
that the proposed deck area is a fire hazard. There were varying opinions
as to whether the deck area is an integral part of the building; whether its
removal would impede the functioning of the building. Another point of
discussion was whether the Board of Appeals had the power to grant a variance
from the Uniform Building Code; the determination would depend on whether
the interior court yards are considered to be public ways. A further point
of discussion was whether it is logical to deny this project on the basis of
lack of parking when other projects are being asked to remove required parking
to improve their projects. It was also suggested that they could easily solve
their parking deficiency by removing the conference areas and converting
them to parking. In regard to the question of whether the mall area is a public
way, the interpretation of the Building Department is that it is not, as it. is
not dedicated land. After some further discussion, Mayor Dobson suggested
that the project could be denied until the problems discussed were solved;. he
also suggested that the letter of denial should spell out the various legal and
physical problems which exist. A motion was already on the floor to deny
the project; the basis was clarified as being set backs, parking and the
proposed deck. Councilmen Steinberg, White, Staufer, and Donovan voted
for the motion and against the project; Councilman Bailey voted against the
motion and for the project. The motion carried.
In regard to the proposed addition to the. Conoco station,.. Councilman Staufer
suggested that the landscaping requirement should be as rigid as possible in
order to achieve the improvement of the entrance to Vail. Councilman
Steinberg suggested that the Conoco company be required to put in writing
that they will follow the landscaping plan the Town requires. It was also sug-
gested that perhaps they should share some of the costs of planning their
landscaping. Additional suggestions were to obtain in writing that the illegal
roof sign will be removed and that the garbage storage area will be hidden.
Councilman White moved that the Conoco station addition be approved with
continued negotiation by the staff on the recommendations; Councilman
Donovan seconded, Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, Steinberg, White
and Dobson voted in favor; the motion carried.
In regard to the Snowbird condominiums, it was agreed -that the planners
should consider this project and hence, a decision will not be made for a
few days.
Mr. Minger explained that, in regard to the parking structure, decisions must
be made by May 1 . He suggested that the project be done by negotiated contract
with Mr. Hyder rather than a bid situation. Councilman Donovan moved that
Mr. Minger be authorized to negotiate with Mr. Hyder; Councilman Staufer
seconded; approval was unanimous.
After some discussion, Councilman Staufer moved that condemnation proceedings
be initiated for the Antholz property. Mayor Dobson cautioned that there are
good reasons for trying to obtain outright sale: 1 . the timetable is difficult in
condemnation; and 2. there may be problems with the ways in which the land
may be used if condemned. Of course, the filing of condemnation is not an
irrevocable action. Councilman White seconded the previous motion; approval
was unanimous.
A s the re was no further bus i ness, the meeting ad j ourned at 12 :45 p. m.
Town Clerk
MI NUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWNS COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
MARCH 15, 1973
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
3:00 p.m., March 15, 1973, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
John Donovan
Joe Langmaid
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator
Gordon Pierce, Planning. Commission
Merv Lapin, Planning Commission
Jim Slevin, Planning Commission
Boothcreek Townhouse project was presented for final approval by Mr. Gordon
Pierce. The Council observed that this is the type of project the Town of
Vail would like to see more of. Mr. Lamont then pointed out that the staff
has met with Mr. Ammons, the owner of the project, and he has agreed to. the
staff recommendations. A motion for approval of the project subject to the
staff recommendations was made by Mr. Donovan. The motion was seconded by
Mr. White and approved unanimously by the Council. Mr. Ammons must submit
a letter to the Town , as well as drawings for a fire protection system.
This system must be approved by the Fire Chief and the Town Engineer. A
landscaping plan must also be submitted for approval.
The Wren project was presented for final approval by Charles Gersbach. It
was pointed out by Ms. Toughill that there is a setback problem on the west
side of the parking structure that must be solved, or a variance will be
necessary. Since the Apollo Park project is so near the.property line, it
is doubtful that the Board of Appeals would grant a variance in this case.
Mr. Lamont stated that the Town staff has met with Mr. Gersbach and John
Huebinger and they have agreed to all recommendations made except items
4, 8 and 13. Mayor Dobson felt it would be necessary to schedule further
meetings with the developer and staff on this project to work out the setback
problem. Mayor Dobson requested the staff to study the project and make
further recommendations to the Council after meetings with the Developer.
Mr. Gordon Pierce presented the Red Lion addition for final approval. In
his presentation he used a model of the Red Lion as it exists and also as it
would appear with the proposed addition. The model depicted the Red Lion in
relation to other structures on Bridge Street. The Council first suggested
that Mr. Burdick wait for the new zoning ordinance as it will take care of all
the setback and parking problems under the new pedestrian precinct. Mr. Pierce
stated this would be too late for 1973 construction since they would :'want to
be finished in time to re-open in November. Mayor Dobson suggested a meeting
with Mr. Burdick when he returns to discuss the possibility of his placing money
in escrow for parking spaces in the future Transportation Center. Mr. Pierce
agreed to this suggestion and will schedule a meeting as early as passible.
The next item on the agenda was the Three Willow Place project (new design)
which was also presented by Mr. Pierce for final approval. The Council agreed
with the staff recommendations and would be agreeable to negotiations on the
parking in front of the building. A motion was made by Mr. White for approval
of the project and seconded by Mr. Langmaid. Approval was unanimous.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m.
Town Clerk
dt
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
MARCH 20, 1973
1. Second reading or Ordinance No. 3 regarding unauthorized
parking on private property.
2. Second reading or Ordinance No. 4 .regarding the accumulation
of refuse.
3. Consideration of an Ordinance creating the Town of Vail
Recreational Fund.
4. Consideration of an ordinance authorizing the initiation
of condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of certain
property within the Town of Vail.
5. Consideration of an ordinance adopting and enacting by
reference a codification of existing ordinances of the Town.
6. Discussion of allocation of "Donations to Organizations;"
specifically, the requests of the Colorado Rivers Council and
the Vail Resort Association.
•
0
r'
s.
•
F11-1d in t!-.c D,-c'-ict Court
Fifth Judicial District, in and for
Eagle County, Color
1 This..1W....day of o:.,ae.19Z:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR T ?-
Clerk of the District Court
COUNTY OF EAGLE AND STATE OF COLORADO
Civil Act ion No . 1856
By ........... .:_.._.........._.._...............:Deputy
3
MANOR VAIL CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
:Plaintiffs,
vs.
THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO,
et al.
Defendants.
This matter comes on for determination by the Court
upon briefs heretofore submitted by the plaintiff and the defend-
ant, together with their oral arguments, on defendants' motion
for summary judgment and motion to dismiss.
The Court, having been informed`in the premises, finds
i
that the motion for summary judgment against the first:, second
and fourth claims for relief have been confessed by the plaintiff,
and it is therefore ordered by the Court that, as to those claims
for relief, the motion for summary judgment is granted, and, as
to those claims for relief, the Complaint is dismissed, with
prejudice.
As to the third claim for relief, the Court grants the
motion of the plaintiff to dismiss, and it is ordered that, as to
the third claim for relief, the Complaint is dismissed, without
prejudice.
The plaintiff is given thirty days to amend his Complaint
'
1 y
?K
00
as to the third claim for relief.
Done in c.am'ners at Eagle, Colorado, this 1st day of
March,.1973, A.D.
B n ' CO
Ju4e
r
•
,.2 -
•
- M
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
MARCH 20, 1973
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 2:15 p.m., March 20, 1973, in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Dick Bailey
John Donovan
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Kent Rose, - Town Engineer
Jim Lamont - Administrative Assistant
Diana Toughill - Zoning Administrator
Dave Sage - Planning Commission
First on the agenda was the proposed addition to the Slifer & Company
building on Bridge Street. Mr. Rod Slifer presented a model to the
Council. Mr. Slifer has two specific problems, on.setbacks and
parking. Since the new zoning ordinance contemplates zero setbacks
in the Commercial Core area it would seem a variance will be granted.
Mr. Slifer has agreed to.meet with the Staff to work out an agreement
on purchasing or leasing parking spaces in the future Transportation
Center. A motion was made by Mr. White to approve the project subject
to the setback variance and a parking agreement. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Steinberg and approved unanimously by the Council with
Mr. Bailey abstaining.
The Red Lion addition which was presented at the March 16 meeting was
again discussed. Mr. Brudick has the same: constraints as Mr, Slifer
has on his addition and it was suggested it could be approved the
same way as the Slifer addition. A motion was made for approval of
the project subject to setback variance and a parking agreement. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Bailey and approved unanimously by the
Council.
Snowbird Condominiums were again presented. by.Mr.. Hoffmann for final
approval. A meeting has been held.with staff an.d.the major problems
for this project have been resolved. The Counc'll accepted the staff
recommendations with one change in Item 3. Dr. Steinberg suggested
that a deadline be glven;on'the temporary parking:on site in the event
that a second phase is not constructed. It was agreed that if phase 2
is not constructed by the 1974 building season, the temporary on-site
parking will be surfaced and made permanent. A motion was made
by Mr. White for approval of Snowbird Condominium subject to the staff
recommendations with the above change. Mr. Bailey seconded the
motion and it was approved unanimously by the Council.
Snowbird Lodge which was disapproved at the March 7, 1973 meeting was
again presented with changes as recommended. Kent Rose met with
Mr. Hoffmann prior to.the meeting and the following items were resolved:
1. Vail Associates will present a letter to the Town of Vail
stating that Tract C will be dedicated as public land.. The Council
felt that we must have the letter so that we may have strict control
over Tract C in the future in the event covenants are changed.
2. Mr. Hoffmann must submit a letter to the Town stating that the
area shown as on-site parking will be landscaped in lieu of the parking
and that he will return the area to parking if the Council determines
it is necessary at any time.in the future.
3. Mr. Hoffmann must also submit a letter to the Town stating that
he will be responsible for any damage to the deck in the event it
is damaged in conjunction with repalr of utilities in the easement
under the deck and that he will pay additional cost of special equip-
ment required to repair utilities due to the location of the deck.
4. Fran Bush must submit a letter to the Council stating that the
deck does not pose a detriment to fire fighting in the area. The
Council will reconsider the project when all of the above conditions
have been met.
r March 20, 1973
Page 2
5
Vantage Point Phase it was presented to the Council for final approval
by Mr. Dana Rickli, Architect for the project. The only problem on
this project is possible fire access to the mall area and the south
side of the building. The staff was requested to meetiwith the Fire
Chief to study this problem and ascertain if the Chief will approve
this project. A motion was made by Mr. White that Vantage Point 11
be approved subject to the Fire Chief's recommendations and a meeting
with the staff to study the fire problem. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Bailey and approved unanimously. A letter has been submitted
by the Fire Chief giving approval of the Fire Access Plan. The Architect
must also submit a landscape plan for approval.
Landmark at Lionshead was presented by the architect, Mr. Dana Rickli,.
for final approval. The Council suggested that the same procedure be
followed with regard to fire access to. this project and to those
adjacent to the proposed project. Staff recommended that a parking
variance for eight cars be granted and landscaping be substituted for
those spaces near the mall area. The owner will agree to reinstate the
parking at any time the Council feels there is a need for more parking
spaces. A landscaping plan must also be submitted for approval. A
motion was made by Mr. Bailey to approve the project subject to.the
above. The motion was.seconded by Dr. Steinberg and approved unanimously.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:35 p.m.
i
dt
0
c v
Town Clerk
140
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
MARCH 20, 1973
A regu tar meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 7:40 p.m., March 20, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney, was also present.
Ordinance No. 3 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING
UPON OR WITHIN PRIVATE PARKING LOTS OR PRIVATE PROPERTY
WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER THEREOF OR PERSON IN
POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF SAID PRIVATE PARKING LOT OR PROPERTY;
IMPOSING CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS UPON THE OWNER OR PERSON IN
POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF PRIVATE PARKING LOTS OR PROPERTY;
PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; AND SETTING
FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced
for second reading. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience
advised that copies were available. The Council was polled as to whether they
had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had. A member
of the audience inquired why the Chief of Police had the duty of determining
size, shape, etc. of the signs. The Mayor responded that this was because
regulatory signs are not in the jurisdiction of the sign review board. How-
ever, this board will be consulted for its opinion. Councilman Donovan
moved Ordinance No. 3 be adopted; Councilman Staufer seconded, Council-
men Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson
voted in favor of the motion, the motion carried.
Ordinance No. 4 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE
ACCUMULATION OF REFUSE., GARBAGE, RUBBISH AND RUBBLE;
REQUIRING CONTAINERS FOR THE STORAGE OF REFUSE; PROVIDING.
PROCEDURES FOR REQUIRING COMPLIANCE; PROVIDING PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for second reading.
The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies
were available. Mr. Robinson noted that the-only changes from the first
reading were a few wording changes. The Council was polled as to whether
they had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had.
Councilman Donovan moved that Ordinance No. 4 be adopted as amended;
Councilman Steinberg seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid,
Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; the motion carried.
Ordinance No. 5 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE TOWN OF
VAIL RECREATIONAL FUND; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF
RECREATIONAL FEES AS A CONDITION OF ISSUING BUILDING PERMITS;
PROVIDING FOR PROCEDURES FOR COLLECTING AND DISBURSING
FUNDS; SPECIFYING PURPOSES FOR WHICH SUCH FUNDS MAY BE
EXPENDED; AND PROVIDING MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION
THERETO was introduced by Councilman Staufer. The title was read in
full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies were available. A
member of the audience suggested that the council should took more closely
at the types of develppments the ordinance would encourage; he felt that
,-
small developments should pay less than large ones. The Mayor noted that
the ordinance establishes categories on the basis of zone areas and that
density tends to follow the zoning. Another member of the audience inquired
what the amount of money obtained is projected to be and over what period
of time this money would be spent. Mayor Dobson indicated that the amount
would depend on the amount and type of construction. Also, that the monies
would be spent as quickly as agreement could be reached on specific projects.
In regard to the payment problem of lodges, the Mayor indicated that the
Council is aware of that potential problem and, if it should materialize, the
ordinance can be amended to provide a different method of payment. The
question was asked why the money could not be raised through a bond issue,
thus taxing everyone and not just the newcomers. The basic reason is that
people who have been here over a number of years have paid taxes to build
the current facilities; the newcomer is, in effect, buying into a going company.
Even though the long-time resident has had the use of the facilities over the
years, the general feeling was that the argument of paying a higher price
for a going concern would still hold.
It was suggested that presenting this ordinance as an emergency ordinance
violates the spirit of the Home Rule Charter. Mr. Robinson disagreed,
stating that as the proposed ordinance was discussed at the meeting two
weeks prior and as notice was given prior- to that meeting, the public has
had advance notice of the intention'. An additional question from the audience
was why the credit provision had been removed. Mayor Dobson indicated
that as any credit system would become rather complicated and as the types
of amenities needed could not be built by individuals, the credit system had
been eliminated after the fees were reduced. At this point, Mayor Dobson
explained why the question of a major bond issue was not being presented
at this meeting. Although the intent had been to proceed as quickly as
possible, after discussion with the bond attorney, fiscal agent, and architect,
it was decided that the time frame originally preferred was too short. Hence,
the collection of data will continue and the bond election will be held during
the summer, to include the transportation center, tiered parking structure
and purchase or condemnation of the Antholz property.
Further discussion centered on the real cost of the fee in terms of front
money for a project. A member of the audience suggested that considera-
tion of this factor showed that the real question is when the fee is to be paid.
Discussion also returned to the question of whether it was fair for only the
new developers to pay the fee. Legally, it is probably impossible to assess
completed projects. A member of the audience suggested that shops and
office buildings should not be assessed. Mayor Dobson responded that these
areas generate people through their employees. It was suggested that these
people are already covered because their living areas are assessed. There
was general disagreement with this suggestion as many employees live out-
side of the town. A further point of discussion was why there was not included
a transfer fee as the new owners would be new people in the community.
Councilman Staufer explained that the concern is with the demand generated
by a facility; that the exact people involved is not the concern. It was sug-
gested that the fee makes housing in Vail for employees more prohibitive
than ever. Mayor Dobson suggested that the new revised fee schedule is not
oppressive to this housing segment. In regard to the penalty for failure to
pay the fee, the developer will not receive an occupancy permit. There are
penalties in the building code for attempting to occupy a building without a
permit. It was emphasized that disbursements from the fund will require a
public hearing, as do all budgetary matters.
As there was no further discussion, the Council was potted as to whether they
had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had. Councilman
Donovan moved that Ordinance No. 5 be adopted as an emergency ordinance,
effective immediately; Councilman Staufer seconded; Councilmen Bailey,
Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor;
the motion carried and the emergency ordinance was adopted.
Ordinance No. 6 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO; DESCRIBING
THE REAL ESTATE TO BE ACQUIRED BY EMINENT DOMAIN AND
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE TOWN ATTORNEY
AND SPECIAL LEGAL COUNSEL TO INSTITUTE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE CONDEMNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; SETTING
FORTH PUBLIC AND MUNICIPAL PURPOSES AND USES FOR THE REAL
ESTATE TO BE CONDEMNED; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced by Councilman Steinberg.
The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies
were available. Mr. Gersbach disagreed that this was the only land avail-
able; he also suggested that there still remained room for further negotia-
tions. He questioned the legal description contained in the ordinance. Mr.
Robinson noted that if this was more inclusive than desired, it would be
amended before second reading. Mr. Gersbach was of the opinion that trad-
ing of condemned land was not possible. Mr. Robinson suggested that substi-
tute condemnation is a legitimate enterprise.
Mr. Gersbach gave a brief history of the property, its owners and the negotia-
tions to date: It is owned by a joint venture composed of the Leavell Develop-
ment Company, a subsidiary of Rio Grande Industries, and the Manor Vail
Co., a limited partnership managed by Manor Vail Corp. The purchase price
in 1969 was $1,250,000; they have had $700,000 in costs since then. In
June, 1972, the joint venture offered to sell the Town 10 acres on the frontage
road for $1.5 million or the entire area for 3.5 million. This offer was
declined. In August, 1972, the joint venture offered to sell the town 10.8
acres for $900,000 and to sell Vail Associates 40,000 square feet plus parking
for $100,000. This offer was declined. The Town then offered the joint
venture $1 .8 million for the entire parcel; this offer was declired. In early
January, 1973, the Town offered Leavell-Manor Vail $2.4 million for the
entire parcel, following the results of the appraisals it had commissioned.
This offer was declined and a counter-offer made. A map demonstrating this
counter-offer was explained. A portion of the area was to be sold to the town
for $2.5 million. The Town declined this offer on. March 15, and terminated.
negotiations. Mr. Gersbach expressed his opinion that the Town was unwise
to go to condemnation as the price in this case is open--ended and the process
takes a great deal of time. He also indicated that he thought the Leavell-
Manor Vail offer was a good one, giving the Town 79% of the land and the
company retaining 21% for development. Mr. Gersbach also suggested that.
the town negotiate for land more evenly distributed throughout the community.
Mayor Dobson noted that the last counter-offer had contained some additional
items. Mr. Gersbach noted that they had asked that the areas they propose
to retain be zoned to a higher density and that the Town of Vail share the costs
of building the bridge. It was noted that the portion of the property owned by
Mr. Miller was not included as development has already begun on this property..
Councilman Langmaid pointed out that the 21% of the property they would like
to retain is the only really buildable land in the parcel. He also asked that,
if the joint venture has additional appraisals, they show them to the Town.
Mr. Gersbach indicated that their highest appraisal is $3.6 million and that
they have four appraisals that are higher than those obtained by the Town.
Mr. Robinson noted that, after condemnation is filed, the Town will be willing
to continue negotiations. Councilman White set forth some of the reasons the
Town would like the property: 1 . it would slow down growth in the core area;
2. the Master Plan will call for some amenities for which the Town currently
has no land and which must be accessible to the core; 3. it would provide a
large open space park for the central area of town. In his opinion, there was
no other land available which would meet the needs of the Town. Mr. Gersbach
indicated that he had not been aware that negotiation could be continued after
condemnation was filed. As there was no further discussion, the Council was
polled as to whether they had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated
that he had. Councilman Staufer moved that Ordinance No. 6 be approved on
first reading and published for public hearing; Councilman White seconded,
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson
voted in favor; the motion carried and the town clerk was instructed to publish
the ordinance.
-3 -
r
Ordinance No. 7 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF VAI L,
ADOPTING AND ENACTING BY REFERENCE A CODIFICATION OF EXISTING
ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN OF A GENERA LA ND PERMANENT NATURE
ENTITLED THE OFFICIAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAI L, was
introduced by Councilman Lang maid . The title was read in full by the Mayor
and the audience advised that copies were available. The Council was polled
as to whether they had read and understood; each indicated that he had.
Councilman Bailey moved that Ordinance No. 7 be approved on first reading
and published for public hearing; Councilman White seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted
in favor; the motion carried and the town clerk was instructed to publish
Ordinance No. 7.
In regard to the a [location of "Donations to Organizations," it was suggested
that a meeting be set up among the VRA, the Colorado Rivers Council and
the Town Council to decide the 'question. The approval of the voucher lists
for January and'February was-deferred until the next meeting. In regard
to the suit brought by the Manor Vail Condominium Association et at against
the Town, Mr. Robinson reported that the court had granted summary judg-
ment in favor of.the Town on three of the four claims for relief. Mr. Lapin
requested that the question of granting a franchise to Eagle County Trash
Service be put on the agenda. Mayor Dobson indicated that it would be
placed on the agenda for the next. meeting.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan mcfved the meeting
adjourn at 9:45 p.m.; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
K'-N' ?- - - ?7&_ 1
Town. Clerk .
•
•
-4-
w
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
MARCH 29, 1973
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was con-
vened at 2:00 p.m., March 29, 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail
Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Gerry White
Joe Langmaid
Dick Bailey
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator
Bob Clark, Planning Commission
Hans Weibel, Planning Commission
Jim Slevin, Planning Commission
Jen Wright, Planning Commission
?. The first item discussed by the Council was the parking situation at
Villa Cortina. The Town staff has proposed the elimination of four
parking spaces near the front entry of the building in order to allow
landscaping and to break up the parking lots between Villa Cortina
and the Bank of Vail. It has been determined that the Bank of Vail
has excess parking spaces and that Kaiser Morcus owns half of their
(Bank of Vail) parking lot. A parking variance will not be necessary
as they can count the four additi,onal?-spaces in the Bank Parking lot
since,there is joint ownership of the property in question.
Next on the agenda was the f,inal' approval for the Wren project. This
project was originally presented for final approval on March 16, 1973
and approval was denied due to a nonconforming setback. The architect,
Mr. Rosolak resubmitted the plot plan with a parking structure that
does conform to the setback requirements. A final landscaping plan
must be submitted for approval. The developer has agreed to all of
the items presented in the staff design review and most of the problems
have been worked out. A motion was made by Mr. White to approve the
Wren. Motion was seconded by Mr. Bailey and approval was given
unanimously.
Snowbird Lodge has met with all of the stipulations set forth. in the
March 20, 1973,ineeting. All required letters have been submitted and
all problems with the deck have been resolved. A motion was made
by Mr. White to approve the project and seconded by Mr. Bailey. Approval
was unanimous.
Booth Falls Mountain Homes has asked for final approval and all items
which were recommended by staff have been agreed to by Mr. Newell.
A plan for fire fighting for the units not accessible by truck will
be submitted for approval by Mr. Newell. Mr. White made a motion for
approval of this project which was seconded by Mr. Bailey. Approval
was given unanimously.
The Sunburst project was again brought up for discussion. The developers
are still concerned about the new zoning ordinance containing a special
zone for this project. Mr. Joe Clancy was informed by the Council that
they did not know, at this time, if there would be a special zone for
the Sunburst project and in the event there is not, working drawings
must be in by the June I, 1973 deadline. Mr. Clancy felt this was a
hardship since they have been more than willing to work with Council
and the Consultants to develop a project Vail will be proud of.
10
Larch 29, 1973
Page 2
Mr. John Eden of Engelke Architects then presented the redesign of
Villa Cortina and the preliminary drawings for the Tennis Club Complex.
The town staff had previously submitted recommendations on both of
these projects. Final landscaping plans must be submitted for approval
on both projects. The parking situation for Villa Cortina had been
discussed previously in the March 29 meeting. As there were no other
problems on the redesign of Villa Cortina, a motion was made by
Mr, Bailey to approve this project. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Langmaid and approved unanimously. A motion was then made to
approve the first Phase of the Tennis Club as submitted. The motion
was made by Mr. Bailey and seconded by Mr. White with unanimous,
approval. Mr. Eden was cautioned by Council that working drawings
for the Tennis Club must be submitted by June I. Council further
stated that there would be no exceptions made to this rule.
7-.?
Council then discussed a letter from Scorpio submitted along with the
same set of plans for Scorpio Phase II that were. rejected on March 14,
1973. The letter stated that the legal description submitted with
the Declaration of Land Allocation when Scorpio Phase I was incorrect.
Even if this is the case, there remains insufficient square footage to
construct the building as proposed. The Council instructed the staff
to again reject the plans for Scorpio II as submitted and further not
to accept revised plans after the April I, 19731 deadline for submittal.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5;30 p.m.
Town Clerk
d
t
•
E
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAT L
APRIL 3, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 7:40 p.m., April 3, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
JoseF Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Gary Wall, Police Chief
Bob Manzanares, Administrative Assistant
18-
The Town of Vail Audit Report was presented by Jerry McMahan, a represen-
tative of McClave, Wall and McMahan. Mr. Minger noted that copies of this
report will be available in the Town Office. He also mentioned that the
Finance Department had won a certificate from the Municipal Finance Officers
Association for the 1971 financial report. Mr. McMahan explained that the
auditors' function is to ascertain whether the Town has support for all trans-
actions during the year. The summary of their report on the Town is that
there are no insolvent funds. As soon as the Vail Water and Sanitation
District report is completed, a consolidated financial statement will be
prepared.
Mr. Bernstein reported on the general fund statement of revenue. There was
a substantial increase in sales tax collections over 1971; sales tax comprises
67% of this fund. Mr. Bernstein explained some of the budget items from
this fund and the actual expenditures as related to these budget items. Although
there was a surplus at the end of the year, this is needed to help ease the cash
flow problems. Other funds explained by Mr. Bernstein were: the additional
cent sales tax fund; the general fixed assets fund; the heavy equipment fund; the
central stores fund; the revenue sharing fund (a decision needs to be made on
the expenditures from this fund); the library fund; and the retirement plans
fund.
Ordinance No. 6 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO; DESCRIB-
ING THE REAL ESTATE TO BE ACQUIRED BY EMINENT DOMAIN AND
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE TOWN ATTORNEY
AND SPECIAL LEGAL COUNSEL TO INSTITUTE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE CONDEMNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; SETTING
FORTH PUBLIC AND MUNICIPAL PURPOSES AND USES FOR THE REAL
ESTATE TO BE CONDEMNED; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced for second reading. The
title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies were
available. Mr. Robinson noted that the legal description had been amended
after, the first reading. The Council was polled as to whether they had read
and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had. Councilman Staufer
moved that Ordinance No. 6 be adopted as amended; Councilman Steinberg
seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White
and Dobson voted in favor; the Mayor declared that the motion carried and the
ordinance was adopted.
In regard to a request for a franchise from the Eagle County Trash Service,,
the first question to be answered is whether or not a franchise is desirable.
Mr. Minger noted that any refuse hauler is controlled by the P.U.C., irre-
gardless of a franchise. This control extends to the control of rates. Council-
man Langmaid was of the opinion that the Town should not grant a franchise to
a private individual. If the consequence is that the individual must raise his
rates, then another company should be able to come in with lower rates, or
the Town should establish its own operation. Mayor Dobson noted that two of
the presumed advantages to the Town would be having more control over the
operation of the trash business and making feasible lower rates by making a
lower interest rate possible. Councilman Bailey inquired of Mr. Lapin what
the actual money saving from a favorable interest rate would be. As a constant
expenditure is necessary in order to replace trucks, the annual saving for a
number of years would be $14,000. Mr. Lapin noted that his company charges
either on a per unit basis or on a volume basis. Councilman Donovan expressed
his concern that the Town might enter into an agreement favorable to itself but
detrimental to outlying areas.
Councilman Steinberg expressed the opinion that the argument regarding free
competition is somewhat fallacious, as, for practical purposes, it would be
very difficult for another company to go into the business in Vail at this point.
Councilman Steinberg's concern is to stabilize the rates; the only means he
sees as available is to grant a franchise. Mr. Evancho, of the trash company,
stated that the best way to ensure the enforcement of rules and improvements
like the enclosure of containers is to grant the franchise. He also noted that
one of the problems of a trash company in an area like Vail is the differential
volurre of business between summer and winter. Mr. Elias expressed his
satisfaction with the operation of the trash business this past winter. He was
concerned, however, that the franchise not be for too long a period and also
that the problems with compactors, bundles, etc., be taken into consideration.
Mr. Nottingham agreed that the service had been good, but felt the rates were
rathe r high. If a franchise wou Id save hi m money., he wou Id be in favor. Mike
Carlisle noted that the Eagle County Trash company had been cooperative with
fire prevention programs. After some further discussion, Councilman Steinberg
moved that a proposed franchise be considered at the next meeting; Councilman
Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staus'er, Steinberg, White and
Dobson voted in favor; Councilman Langmaid voted against; the motion carried.
Mr. Minger reported that the new zoning ordinance is ready and is being typed.
It will be presented at the study session next Tuesday at 2 p. m. and copies
will be available to the public.
A letter from the Planning Commission recommending approval cf the plat of
Vail Village 10th Filing was read. Jen Wright explained that the filing contains
11 single family lots. The major access is Ptarmigan Road. The filing is
40 within the Town of Vail and zoned Residential. Jim Viele noted that 2 acres
of the land has been dedicated to the Town for open space. Councilman Bailey
moved that the plat of Vail Village 10th Filing be approved; Councilman Donovan
seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, Langmaid, Steinberg, White
and Dobson voted in favor, the motion carried.
The minutes of the meetings of March 5, 7, and 13, 1973, had been previously
submitted to the Council. Councilman White moved they be approved; Council-
man Staufer seconded; approval was unanimous.
Gary Wall, Police Chief, modeled the proposed new police uniform. It was
noted that the new uniform is being introduced in order to get away from the
militaristic appearance. In regard to the Police Station remodeling, Mr.
Minger explained that it is being financed by a $401000 grant from CLLEA.
One feature will be a county-wide communications system. Also to be added
are tab facilities, showers and lockers. In regard to the communications
system, it was explained that the current facilities are overloaded and there
are black-out areas, in which the Town has in the past acted as a relay. In
addi'ti on, the Town will no longer be on the same frequency as Vail Associates.
The Town has been asked by Vail Associates if they would accept the dedication
of the 5-13 area (the pond and surrounding area). Mr. Minger expressed his
-2-
xJ
q _ 0
V ?il
opinion that, if the dedication was accepted, VA should be asked to participate
in a financial way in providing some of the needed landscaping. Mr. Nott of
VA noted that they had already done considerable work in this area. He also
brought out the liability situation of the area; the steps are rather dangerous.
Work will be continued to reach a satisfactory agreement
An additional report from Mr. Minger was that negotiations with Cable TV are
to begin shortly. The Town has been approached by several other television
companies. Mr. Robinson reported that the Town is currently involved in
more litigation than ever before in its history.
Chuck Ogilby of Trout Unlimited reported that this group had been approached
by scm e kayakers with a request that large snags and dams be removed from
Gore Creek. He requested that the Town become involved and help to decide
what possible adverse effects would occur. Mr. Ogilby recommended Council-
man Donovan as the Council representative. Councilman Donovan accepted
the appointment and inquired if there is an ordinance preventing this type of
stream maintenance. He suggested that if there is.not such an ordinance, one
should be created. Larry Benway reported that the Colorado White Water
Association would Like to have a slalom race on Gore Creek, which would
originate in Town. The Mayor suggested that they appear before the Council
with their request.
Rob Garton asked if the allocation of "Donations to Organizations" had yet
been made. It had not, one reason for the delay being that the current VRA
Board is a lame duck board. After some discussion Councilman Donovan
moved that the Colorado Rivers Council be given $8,000 to be paid at the
rate of $1,000 per month for 8 months and the donation to the VRA be con-
sidered at a later time; Councilman Staufer seconded; approval was unanimous.
Councilman Steinberg requested that the Council be kept posted on the way the
money is used.
Mr.. Richard Hart presented the Council with petitions signed by people who
were concerned about the costs and benefits of the Ginkelvan and who also
felt that more public exposure and discussion were needed. Councilman
White noted that the wording of the petition was somewhat vague. Mayor
Dobson read the petition statement in full. He noted that one point which
seems to have been misunderstood is that the Ginkelvan is not the solution,
but only a portion of the total solution. Mr. Hart stated that he thought the
concern was over the cost of the van and the number contemplated. Further
exchanges brought out the point that few of the signers of the petition had ever
attended any meetings of the Council: The Mayor noted that no additional
Ginkelvans will be purchased until the questions over the present one are
resolved. Mr. McLaughlin disagreed that communications problems could
be solved by attending meetings; he stated that he had attended every meeting
46 and still had not heard the Ginkelvan compared to other viable alternatives.
It was brought out that the Ginkelvan is an experimental vehicle; and, hence,
much data is not yet available and will only be available after it has been in
operation. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he was not quite sure what "the
whole deal is all about.." Mayor Dobson suggested that perhaps the Ginkelvan
had been too much promoted as an exciting symbol of the proposed transporta-
tion system;, the main thrust is to encourage people to address themselves to
the transportation problem in Vail. A member of the audience asked if the
Ginkelvan were the least polluting vehicle available. If the use of the Ginkelvan
keeps a number of cars from being used, the pollution has been lessened to a
certain extent. In regard to questions about a comparison with the currently-
used blue school buses, Mr. Minger noted that the school bus is expensive in
terms of maintenance and operation. Comparisons have been made with other
buses and rigid tests are being made on the Ginkelvan in operation. Mr. Minger
was of the opinion that a few modifications are needed. The actual cost of the
Ginkelvan is not yet known as it is not in production; however, Mr. Minger
was of the opinion that it would be competitive with the Mercedes bus and less
of a polluter. Councilman White added that, in his opinion, the blue school
buses are visually polluting to Vail. The Mayor urged that people either dis-
agree or agree with the idea that there is a transportation problem in Vail
and proceed from that point.
-3-
In further discussion, Mr. Minger noted that it is possible that the Ginkelvan
can actually carry more people, in greater comfort, and in a shorter time
than the school buses. The question of an electric bus was raised. The
Ginkelvan is ultimately convertible to electric power; however, at this time,
electric power is not practical. In summary, the Mayor expressed his
regret at the breakdown in communications; however, it would seem the
only way the Council has of communicating at this time is by either the
written word or meetings.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the meeting
adjourn at 10:30 p. m.
Town Clerk
Ll
n
?J
V -4-
Y
%+t MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VA1L
APRIL 1 1 , 1973
A work session of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
2:04 p.m., April 1 1 , 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Joe Montano, Special Counsel
John Holloway, Special Counsel
Mayor Dobson noted that Mr. Montano and Mr. Holloway were present to
discuss the Antholz condemnation and surrounding litigation. Mr. Holloway
explained that the joint venture had sought to enjoin the passing of the
ordinance and, secondly, the filing of the condemnation suit. The law is
well settled that the courts wilt not enjoin a legislative body from passing
a law; rather, they will enjoin the enforcement. Also, it is well settled
that the courts will not enjoin a body from exercising the power of eminent
domain as the other party has a remedy at law without the injunction. A
separate suit was also filed to disconnect the property from the Town. The
joint venture appeared to be arguing that the Town cannot condemn outside
its boundaries; however, as a, home `rule town, Vail does not operate under
the statutes, which do prohibit this type of condemnation, but under the
Constitution, which allows condemnation outside of the boundaries. The
suit to disconnect will be heard on May 22. The joint venture has now appealed
the decision against the granting of an injunction. If they should lose in the
Court of Appeals, they have no further right to be heard; the Supreme Court
would have to choose to hear the case.
A petition for condemnation has been prepared. It will be filed in Eagle on
the 12th or 13th. The joint venture has 20 days to answer the petition; they
will probably set forth a number of objections. The Court will hear these
objections before they appoint a commission to determine the just compensa-
tion. The general feeling was that this petition should be filed as soon as
possible; Mr. Montano noted that the joint venture has not asked For a "stay
of execution" of any of these further steps. Mr. Holloway suggested that
the joint venture might drop the disconnection action if it would hurt them
financially in terms of the valuation of the property.
Councilman Langmaid inquired how requests for building permits on this
property should be handled. Mr. Minger felt this should not be a problem
as they cannot be given one if the land is not platted. Mr. Robinson clarified
that this is only true if the land is to be sold; otherwise, they can build for
their own use. He felt the reason they would not build is that there are no
water and s,Pwer lines. Mr. Robinson remarked further that there is no
procedure for disconnecting from the water and sewer district; hence, they
might be out of the town, but in the District. Mr. Minger felt that, in this
case, the District would file suit against them.
Returning to the question of condemning outside of the boundaries, Mr. Holloway
noted that there is also a statutory provision which allows this type of condemna-
tion for park purposes. Possible objections to the condemnation petition might
be: 1. that the Town did not negotiate in good faith; 2. that the exchange .
proposal is not allowable; 3. that the condemnation is not necessary; 4.
that the Town cannot condemn outside of its boundaries. After some dis-
cussion, there was general agreement that the effort to disconnect should
be vigorously resisted. It was explained that if they were successful in
disconnecting from the Town, the property cannot be subdivided into lots
smaller than those allowable in Town nor can it be put to any industrial or
commercial use that would not be allowable under the zoning of the Town for
a period of six years..
Councilman Langmaid inquired what would happen if the Town won the condemna-
tion suit but lost the bond issue. It was generally agreed that the election on
the bond issue would be held prior to a court determination of the condemna-
tion question. Mayor Dobson asked when it was estimated that the Town would
have possession of the property if they won the suit. Mr. Holloway noted
that three appeals are possible; however, such a lengthy procedure would
not be advantageous to the joint venture economically. After the petition
is filed, the Board is entitled to see the appraisals the joint venture has
received.
It was mentioned that the Colorado Municipal League conference will be held
in Colorado Springs in June, Any of the Council members who would like
to attend are invited to do so.
As there was no further business, the session adjourned at 3:10 p.m.
Town Clerk
1
?J
1
Page 2
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAT L
APRIL 17.$ 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., April 17, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:.
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Bob Manzanares, Administrative Assistant
The meeting was first convened with the members of the Town Council acting
as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
Holly Vail, Inc. had submitted a. request to expand their licensed premises to
the west patio. This area was not included in the original application. After
some discussion, Councilman Donovan moved the extension west of the premises
by Holly Vail be approved; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. and the Town
Council convened .
Ordinance No. 7 (Series of 1973), AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF VAI L,
ADOPTING AND ENACTING BY REFERENCE A CODIFICATION OF EXISTING
ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN OF A GENERA L AND PERMANENT NATURE
ENTITLED THE OFFICIAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL . . . . . . . was
introduced for second reading. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the
audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson noted that there
were no changes from the first reading. The Council was potted as to whether
they had read and understood the Ordinance; each member indicated that he had.
Councilman Steinberg moved that Ordinance No. 7 be adopted; Councilman
Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg,
White and Dobson voted in favor; the motion carried and Ordinance No. 7 was
adopted.
Mr. Minger reported that Livingston--"and' Blaney have submitted a portion of a
draft of the new zoning ordinance. It is hoped that the final document will be
available in June.. Mayor Dobson requested that interested individuals please
read the document and give the Town their comments.
A draft of the trash agreement had been prepared, to be used if the Council
desired to grant such a franchise. Councilman Staufer noted that he thought
there should be other ways by which the company.,cou Id affect the savings they
desire. He was also concerned that the controls gained were not necessarily
substantial and that they would only be effective within the city limits. That it
was proved by the same people at their original P. U. C. hearing that competi-
tion is necessary in Vail was additionally noted by Councilman Staufer.. The
relationship to other franchises, such as Holy Cross, was also discussed.
'nterest in the matter as he owns
Councilman Steinberg stated that he hasa.n t
trash containers which are teased to the company. However, he did not feet
his interest would be affected by the decision on the franchise. He was of the
1
opinion that the P. U. C. control is not well-exercised; hence, it is necessary
to protect the citizens by a franchise. Mr. Lapin noted that the rate schedule
included in the draft agreement is the one currently filed with the P.U.C.
However, he stated that they generally charge less than the stated rates; the
maximum rates are charged only in extraordinary situations. Mr. Lapin noted
that the P . U . C . approval is presumed; the rates are mailed to them, and if
they do not respond, it is assumed that they approve. Councilman White stated
that the overriding factor as he sees it is that anyone else who might begin such
a service in Vail at this time would probably be a large, out-of-town company.
He thought it preferable to have local people performing the service. Council-
man Langmaid suggested that the benefits to the Town had not yet been delineated;
also, he objected that the rates included in the proposed agreement were not the
ones actually being charged.
Mr. Lapin explained some of his unique financial difficulties. The essence of
his statement was.that. if he were not in the securities business, his borrowing
would not be so strictly limited. Mayor Dobson reiterated that the concern of
the Council is the effect of a franchise on the residents of the Town and on the
residents of the outlying areas.. Mr. Minger explained that, although he was of
the opinion that Mr. Lapin's company is doing a commendable job, he did not
feel the staff could recomenend a franchise. He also suggested that the Town
has a great deal more control, even without a franchise, in this area than it
currently exercises.
Mr. Lapin explained that he would like a three-year agreement, with a review
each year. In regard to the incomplete rate schedule, he was of the opinion
that a written rate schedule which covered every possible circumstance would
be unwieldy. Mr. Lapin had no objection to saying that the rates would be the
same in East and West Vail as in the Town. Without the franchise, Mr. Lapin
would increase costs to cover the real costs he would incur; however, he did
not know how much this would be per house. More discussion ensued of whether
or not the P. U . C . permit was in effect a franchise. Councilman Bailey sug-
gested that the staff research more extensively whether or not a franchise would
be duplicating P. U. C. actions. Mr. Manzanares was of the opinion that the
Town would have to clear any rate controls in the franchise through the P. U. C.
Mr. Robinson suggested that the P.U.C. would always ignore the rate schedules
mailed to them until a group of citizens protested. In regard to the rates
included in the pr oposed agreement, he suggested that they be ignored and the
effort to schedule them begin again with an understanding of the rate of return
accruing to the prospective franchisee. Mr. Lapin d isag reed that the P. U. C.
allows only a 6% rate of return; the necessary capital could not be attracted on
that basis, in his opinion.
In the event the Council decided in favor of a franchise, the proposed agreement
would be incorporated into an ordinance. Mr. Elias made several points in
regard to the agreement: I . that it appeared to be very hurriedly written; 2.
that the financial structure of the business should not be a matter of concern;
3. that compactors should be considered; 4. that any member oFthe Council
who was involved in a financial venture with Mr. Lapin should abstain from
wting. A final comment from the audience was that using profit as the reference
for the rates is troublesome as a company might not be showing a profit due
not to the deficiency in the rates, but to their own inefficient operation.
The minutes of the meetings of March 5 and March 20 had been previously
submitted to the Council. Councilman Donovan moved they be approved; Council-
man White seconded; approval was unanimous
Mayor Dobson noted that it appeared likely there would be no Council meetings
held in May due to the lack of a quorum. Mr. Minger reported that the Institute
of Arctic and Alpine Research would be doing a study of the entire valley. This
project is funded by,NA SA; however, they wi It not pay lodging. The cost to the
Town for lodging would be $750, if the Council chose to provide this, Councilman
-2-
r
Donovan moved the Town pay the lodging costs for this group; Councilman White
seconded; approval was unanimous. As a point of information, Mr. Robinson
noted that it would be fiscally responsible, although not regUi'red, for the Council
to approve the voucher lists. In regard to the Holy Cross franchise' request,
Mr. Minger noted that since Mr. Gamblin left the company, the Town has not
been approached on the matter. There was general agreement that discussions
should be pursued on this matter. A further point noted was that the VRA will
approach the Council after their first meeting in May regarding the promised
donation to that organization. Finally, an up=dated series of sketches of the
proposed transportation center/parking structure complex are available in the
Town office.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the meeting
adjourn at 9:00 p.m.; Councilman Langmaid seconded; approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk
r?
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COU NCI L OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
MAY 1, 1973
A regu tar rre eti ng of the Town Counci I of the Town of Vai t was con-
vened at 7:30 P.M., May 1, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail
Municipal Building.
The following Councilmen were present:
John Donovan
Richard Bailey
0-
Bob Manzanares, Administrative Assistant, was also present.
John Donovan, serving as Acting Mayor, declared that there were
insufficient members present to constitute a quorum, and that any
business to come before. the meeting would have. to be continued unti t
such time as a quorum could be present.
Several items on the agenda pertaining to variances from the parking
requirements of the zoning ordinance for the Town of Vail, for which
notice had been previously published, were rescheduled for Tuesday,
May 15, 1973, at 7:30 P.M. in the Town Council chambers.
Upon motion made by John Donovan and seconded by Richard Bailey,
it was
VOTED: to reconvene the meeting at the
appointed hour on May 15, 1973.
f
Mr. Donovan then adjourned the meeting until the next scheduled
meeting.
%?2GL?l/? y?1 ltCtur'
?>r
Town Clerk
/nmm
"-i
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
MAY 15, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., May 15, 19733 in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor Pro-tern John Donovan and the Following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Mr. McLaughlin was present representing Gaynor Miller, et at. in their
request for a waiver of the parking requirement. He explained that the
difficulty involved a change of use. They are contemplating the installation
of a restaurant. It was his understanding that the parking which would be
required would only be that necessary for the restaurant. Councilman Donovan
stated that he thought the Red Lion and Slifer (Who were in somewhat of a
comparable position) were going to purchase parking for the entire operation.
Mr. Robinson noted that their commitment was to abide by whatever require-
ments are included in the new ordinance. The present ordinance relates to
substantial alterations; hence, the requirement would be to provide parking
for the new portions. Mr. McLaughlin. noted that a little over 4000 square
feet is involved in the alteration, with a requirement of 12 parking spaces
There was some discussion of the exact number of spaces; Mr. McLaughlin
noted they would complywith the number .c9etermined by the formula in the
new ordinance. He indicated further that if the spaces to be purchased were
prohibitively expensive, it would be interpreted that they thus had, in effect,
no variance
Councilman Donovan suggested that the Council first consider the request of
Shareholders Recreation Program that parking be waived in order to obtain
additional green space, with the understanding that it would be re-converted
to parking, if necessary. Councilman White moved that the variance be
granted; Councilman Steinberg seconded.; approval was unanimous.
. Councilman Donovan noted that in the second application, that of Mr. Slifer,
it has been agreed that he will purchase 3 to 5 spaces at the going rate, to be
determined in the future. An agreement has been signed to the effect that
they will comply with future requirements.
While awaiting further information, the minutes of the meetings of April 3,
April 1 1 , and May 1 were considered; Councilman White moved they be
approved; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
E to go through the variance procedure, as well as to sign the agreement. Council-
In regard to the request of Engelke Architects for Lionshead Lodge, Ms.
Toughill explained that they have 12 spaces which are not of the proper size.
The parking area is enclosed. Councilman Bailey moved that spaces of 91
by 18' be approved; Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
In regard to the payments to be made for spaces in a proposed structure, it
was suggested that the purchaser would pay a pro rata share of the debt service
cost. Councilman White inquired if Mr. Robinson was satisfied with the agree-
ment signed by Mr. Slifer. Mr. Robinson replied that he thought it necessary
man Bailey inquired what would happen if those signing the agreement refused
to purchase spaces after completing their building. Mr. Robinson stated that
an escrow arrangement to assure collection of the funds could be provided.
It was suggested that a provision should be added to the new zoning ordinance
that requires buildings in CCI to provide parking in the structured parking
lot. Mr. McLaughlin suggested that if the signer of the agreement did not
comply, the Town could have grounds for a civil suit. The security in such
a case would be that the property can be attached. In regard to the request
of Mr. Miller, he noted that white he had been authorized to agree to the signing
of an agreement, he did not know if Mr. Miller would be willing to place money
40 in an escrow account. He suggested also.that it would be less burdensome to
require bonding of the applicant, rather than an escrow account. Some further
discussion ensued of the alternatives available to the Council.
Councilman Steinberg moved that the variance for Rodney Slifer be approved,
subject to the agreement to purchase parking spaces; Councilman White
seconded; Councilmen Donovan, Steinberg and'White voted in favor; Council-
man Bailey abstained; the motion carried and the variance was conditionally
granted.
Counci lman Steinberg moved that a waiver of the parking require ment for Mr.
Miller, et at. be denied and that they be given a variance subject to the signing
of the agreement to purchase parking spaces; Councilman White seconded; Council-
men Bailey, Donovan, Steinberg and White voted in favor; the motion carried.
Councilman Donovan noted that the Hauserman addition was being constructed
without following the procedures for a variance. Although a building permit had
been issued in error, he suggested that a stop-work order be issued. Mr.
Robinson noted that if a building inspector makes a mistake in the checking of
plans, he can issue such an order; however, this error does not relate to the
building code but to the zoning ordinance. After some discussion of the matter,
Councilman Steinberg moved that the owners of the Hauserman addition be
required to sign an agreement to purchase parking; Councilman Bailey seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan and Steinberg voted in favor; Councilman White
voted against; the motion carried. Councilman Donovan noted that one effect
of the motion would be that a stop work order be issued for the project.
Councilman Donovan stated that he would like to see an ordinance requiring that
sewer and water line construction areas be returned to their natural state. Mr.
Minger suggested that perhaps the landscaping bond required by the proposed
new zoning ordinance could be expanded to cover this situation. Councilrra.n
White suggested that it was necessary to appoint an environmental commission
in the near Future. Councilman Donovan added that perhaps this should be done
by July 1 . It was moved that the Council begin to receive names of candidates
for this commission; Councilman Steinberg seconded; approval was unanimous.
Councilman Donovan suggested that a member of the Town staff be appointed to
work on the 4th of July parade. Mr. Minger appointed Mr. Lamont. Councilman
Donovan suggested that it is necessa ry for a member of the town staff to
coordinate the undergrounding of lines by the various utility companies. Mr.
Manzanares had already been appointed:. In regard to an ordinance to protect the
stream, Mr. McLaughlin volunteered to re-work a draft ordinance that he had
prepared on this subject.
As there was no further business, Councilman Bailey moved the Town Council.
adjourn at 8:50 p.m.; Councilman Steinberg seconded. The L. cal Liquor
Licensing Authority was convened at 8:50 p. m. Mr. Minger explained that
the town had allocated funds for an evening of entertainment for the American
Association of Travel Agents. The request coming before the Authority was
for permission to consume alcoholic beverages on Bridge Street. Mr. Robinson
questioned whether or not the Town was willing to assume the responsibility for
600 to 800 people drinking in the public street. Police Chief Wall also noted
that, realistically, it would not be possible to distinguish between the members
of the association and other people. After some discussion, it was moved that
. 9
Page 2
'the application -For a special events permit be approved for June 7 and 8 with
the events to end at 10:00 p.m. Councilmen Bailey, Donovan and Steinberg
voted in `Favor; Councilman White voted against; -the motion carried.
As there was no further business, Counciln-an White moved the Local Liquor
Licensing Authority adjourn at 9:00 p, m,; Councilman Bailey seconded;
approval was unanimous.
`frown Clerk'
C7_j
Page .3
1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JUNE 5, 1973
i
A regu tar meeting of the Town Counci I of the Town of Vai l was convened at
7:45 p.m., June 5, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Also present were:
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
•
The meeting was first convened with the Council acting as the Local Liquor
Licensing Authority.
Clifford Bruce Hartman had submitted 'an application for a beer, wine and
liquor license For the Clock Tower Inn. Stuart Brown was present represent-
ing the applicant. Mr. Robinson noted that as the premise has been previously
licensed, the qualifications of the applicant are the only questions.. Mr. Brown
noted that an error had been made on the application; he moved that Item 15
be amended as Mr. John Kaemmer, has no interest in other liquor licenses.
Mr. Robinson noted that this stenographic error would be corrected. Mr.
Hartman noted that the Clock Tower has been operating through a management
agreement with Mr. Kaemmer, Mr. Brown indicated that the lease comes
into effect when and if the authority grants a license. Councilman Donovan
inquired if the applicant was aware that a portion of the patio is on a Town
easement; Mr. Hartman answered that he was. Mr. Wall noted that they have
not received any negative reports from the FBI on the applicant, Councilman
Donovan moved that the application for Mr. Hartman be approved; Councilman
White seconded; approval was unanimous.
An application had been received from Otto Stork, Inc. for a 3.2% beer license
for the Delicatessen. Jay Peterson vAas present representing the applicant.
Mr. Robinson noted that the premises had been previously licensed, Mr. Peterson
noted that the applicant has not sold :any beer on the premises since they closed
the transaction. That none of the applicants has a criminal record was noted by
Mr. Wall. Councilman Bailey moved that the application for Otto Stork, Inc.
be approved; Councilman Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous.
Manor Vai I Condominium Assoc latton,:had submitted an application for an
expansion of the premises into 1240'square feet of the existing Conference Area.
Mr. Robinson noted that, from the Town records, this area had previously been
licensed; hence, the request must ire anotation of the, Fact that they are changing
portions of the area, Councilman' Stauffer moved that the application be approved;
Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
A proposed reprimand for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District had been
prepared. The Recreation District last winter had made available the bar and
restaurant facility at the Golf Clubhouse to Russian Excursion, which was subse-
quently closed for sanitary violations and the lease terminated. Due to this
termination, a suspension of the license would not be in order. The Recreation
District was also not directly culpable; only negligent in their supervision of
their managers. Mr. Lapin inquired.who manages the Recreation District.
Mr. Robinson noted that their administrative matters are handled by the staff
r of the Town government. Mr. Etter, of the State Department of Revenue, agreed
with the case as put by Mr. Robinson. Councilman Bailey moved that the
reprimand for the Recreation District be approved; Councilman Staufer seconded;
Councilman White abstained; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, Langmaid
and Dobson voted in favor; the motion carried.
In regard to an application for a special events permit for the 7th and 8th of
June, the request from the Town had been denied by the State and the VRA
had intended to apply in their place. However, Mr. Robinson reported that
the VRA now did not wish to apply. The Town application had been denied on
the basis of a 20-year old attorney general's opinion which had been construed
to make a city ineligible to hold a liquor license. Mr. Elias explained that they
had decided not to apply because they would have to purchase the liquor them-
selves and also because there might be some violations involved. Mr. ER&r
explained some of the problems involved. The premise must be controlled by
the licensee; a requirement,that a public street might not meet. Also, the
applicant must serve food, and the liquor must be consumed on the premise.
Mr. Robinson disagreed to the extent that he thought the intent of the provision
for special events permits was the licensing of public places. Mr. Etter
mentioned that 3.2 beer would be a different matter. Some discussion ensued
of the intent of the town to give a party, rather than just give each person the
money to buy drinks. Suggestions were made to use the playground or block
off the street in order to more define the area and to serve food. Mr. Etter
noted that if the VRA had possession of the premises and would buy the liquor
and oversee the operation, it might be possible to obtain the permit. Mr.
Etias proposed that, assuming the agreement of the executive board of the
VRA, the VRA would proceed with the application with a changed location.
After some further discussion, it was suggested that the possibility of a dif-
ferent Location be considered and a meeting be held at 11:00 a. m. on Wednesday
to formally prepare the -application for submission to the State Department of
Revenue.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the Local. Liquor
Licensing Authoe^ty adjourn at 9:10 p. m.; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval
was unanimous.
The Town Council convened in joint session with the PLanning Commission at
9:10 P.M.
The following Planning Commission members were present:
Merv Lapin
Gordon Pierce
Dave Sage
. Jim S Levin
Hans Weibel
Mayor Dobson noted that Robert Clark, Chairman of the Planning Commission,
has resigned.
The item to be considered by the joint session was a request for the re-platting
of Lots 3 and 4, Block. 3:, Vail Village 3rd Filing to the Town of Vail. Mr.
Robinson noted that the staff had received a late request that this matter be
postponed. Councilman Donovan moved that the matter of a request for
re-platting be continued to a future meeting; Councilman Bailey seconded.
Mr. Lapin inquired why it was necessary for the Planning Commission to be
present at the meeting; Mr. Robinson replied that matters dealing with sub-
dividing must come before the Planning Commission; however, the particular
request also required Council action. Mayor Dobson asked that the Planning
Commission make a recommendation to the Counci t on the matter. The vote
on the previous motion was unanimous.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved that the joint
session be adjourned and the Town Council convened at 9:20 p.m.; Councilman
Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
-2-
Requests for parking variances had be,n received from the representatives of
Sunbird Lodge, Landmark at Lionshead, Vail International and the Red Lion.
Mr. Rose noted that most of these variances are the result of requests from
the Town Council and he would recommend that they be granted. After some
further discussion, Councilman Bailey moved that the variances for Sunbird
Lodge, Landmark at Lionshead and Vail International be approved; Councilman
White seconded; approval was unanimous. In regard to the request of the Red
Lion, Mayor Dobson noted that Mr. Burdick is willing to sign an agreement to
lease or purchase spaces in a parking structure. After some further discussion,
Councilman Donovan moved that the variance for the Red Lion be approved
subject to the signing of an agreement to purchase parking spaces when and if
available; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
Councilman White movedthat a resolution setting a public hearing for the annexa=
tion of the territory commonly known as Vail Village, 11th Filing to the Town of ..
Vail be approved; Councilman ;Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mr. Robinson stated that Mr. Amato was present to discuss the question of
rights of access to the A & D Enterprises building. Mr. Amato noted that when
Vail Associates sold lots in the core area, they retained ownership of the
streets. They then gave easements, not limited in time, in the streets to the
lot owners. It is his contention that the Town did not acquire all of the out-
standing interests in the streets when Vail Associates deeded them to the Town.
In view of this, he was considering seeking an injunction against the closure of
the streets in the core area. As an alternative, they would like the Town to
admit that they do not have total control of the streets and then agree to allow
persons desirous of going to the A & D building free access at any time. Mr.
Robinson stated that while he would acknowledge that A & D Enterprises and
other early property owners appear to have a right granted to them by Vail
Associates prior to the dedication of the streets, any determination beyond
that he found to be a policy matter. Mr. Robinson noted that a new law allow-
ing governmental bodies to create pedestrian malls might override these private
easements. He suggested that. the Counci 1 decide if they want to come under
this law. Mr. Amato contended that the Town must either acquire the consent
of those who hold interests or acquire those interests. Mr. Amato did agree
that the traffic gate creates a desirable situation, although he maintains it
violates his rights and hurts him economically. Councilman White inquired
if Mr. Amato would dedicate those rights to the Town, if the Town admitted he
had them. Mr. Amato suggested that that depended on other situations. The
distinction between a private street and interests in a public street was explained.
Mr. Amato stated that it was not his understanding at the time of purchase of
the property that the concept of Vail had always been a pedestrian one. Mr.
S ievin disagreed that the street closure necessarily created any permanent
economic hardship on businesses in the area. Councilman Donovan moved that
the question of rights in the street be tabled until the meeting of June 19, at
which time a decision of the Council will be announced; the motion carried.
unanimously. A meeting will be held in the interim to discuss the situation.
Mr. Dobson explained that a suggestion has been made that the old sewer A-game
be converted into an arts and crafts center and possibly a winter day-care center.
The land is owned by Val I Associates. Mr. Rose rep orted that $15, 000 wou Id
completely remodel the plant, landscape the area and winterize the building.
The labor for the project would be given by Val I Associates. The only question
he had was the period of time the building would be available. Mr. Nott noted
that pending site-planning, he could only commit to use for a couple of summers.
Mayor Dobson noted, in regard to efforts in the same vein, that the Vall Institute
is incorporating and that their first project is summer theater, the space for
which has been donated by Vail Associates in the Lionshead terminal. After
some further discussion, Mr. Nott suggested that perhaps an answer could be
given in 10 days on the period of time the building could be used. Mr. Rose
suggested that pending this answer, the building could be re-modeled for the
Summervail workshop. Mr. Milhoan, of that workshop, inquired how long it
would take to rennovate the building, as his group has less than a month before
they are scheduled to begin. There was general agreement that it ccu id be done
-3_
in time. Mr. Milhoan also thought the plans should be looked over by people
experienced in art. He was a bit skeptical of its suitability for the workshop.
Mayor Dobson agreed that it might not be ideal for 200 to 300 people. Mr.
Rose noted that the cost for summer remodeling would be $6,000. After some.
discussion, Mr. Rose was authorized to remove the ice from the building pending
a commitment of use from Colorado Mountain College and the results of the
site-planning from Vail Associates.
Councilman White moved that the Council authorize $5,000 for a joint effort
of the Town and the VRA for Fourth of July fireworks. Councilman Donovan
seconded; approval was unanimous.
The minutes of the meetings of March 16, March 29, and April 17 had been
previously submitted to the Council. Councilman White.moved they be accepted;
Councilman Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous.
The next item on the agenda, the question of the applicability of the Recreation
Fee to the Rich condominium project, would require some additional data from
the files. Hence, it will be discussed at a later time.
The question of summer bus service was raised from the floor. Mayor Dobson
noted that the Ginkelvan will be put in service as soon as repairs are completed.
He also noted that the VA buses are available for lease. A member of the
audience noted that private individua is cannot rent buses from Vai l Associates.
Mr. K lug suggested that he could contact other people in the Lim s head area to
• get their suggestions, which he could pass on to Mr. Rose. Mr. Elias sug-
gested that, on a regular basis, two buses were too many. Mayor Dobson
concluded the discussion with the stattement that the town would look into the
possibility of leasing Vail Associates' buses.
Mr. Elias reported that Mr. Eller had contacted the state liquor licensing
officials and they were of the opinion that the VRA request for a special events
permit would be denied. Mayor Dobson suggested that they still meet at
11:00 a. m. on Wednesday to consider the matter.
Councilman Donovan brought up the matter of a request for two security trailers
at construction sites at Booth Creek. Mr. Wall noted that it. is a violation of
town ordinances if anyone lives in the trailer. After some further discussion,
Councilman White suggested that the security problem could be solved in other,
legal ways. There was general agreement with this approach.
A final item of business was a suggestion that the Council pass a resolution
supporting the creation of the Eagles Nest Wilderness area. Councilman White
moved that such a resolution be passed; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval
was unani mous.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 p. m.
fV
Town Clerk
-4-
1%,
i' " MI NUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JUNE II and 12, 1973
A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was con-
vened at 10:00 a.m., on June II and June 12, 1973 in the Council
Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Council.'men were present:
June I I :
Richard Bailey
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
June 12:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Also present for the meetings were:
Larry Livingston -- Livingston and Blayney
Bob Glover - Livingston and Blayney
Larry Robinson - Town Attorney
Kent Rose - Town Engineer
Diana Toughill - Zoning Administrator
Hans Weibel - Member, Planning Commission
Jen Wright - Member, Planning Commission
Jim Slevin - Member, Planning Commission
Dave Sage - Member, Planning Commission
The purpose of the meetings was to discuss and recommend changes for
the proposed zonong ordinance. Larry Livingston first gave a general
summary pertaining to the evolution of the ordinance. The proposed
ordinance is very different from the one the Town is now using and
it greatly reduces the intensity of development. He also pointed
out that four new sections have been added to the ordinance--Single
Family Residential, Low Density Multi-family, Design Review, and
Environmental Impact Study.
The Council then proceeded to review the proposed ordinance and the
following changes were suggested:
Article I - In discussing the definition of an accommodation unit,
Livingston suggested that up to one--third of the floor area of a
dwelling unit could be an accommodation unit and parking calculated
on the basis of a dwelling unit. Mr. Staufer disagreed with the
definition and felt that parking should be provided for both the
dwelling unit and the attached accommodation unit as calculation for
just a dwelling unit is discriminatory against the lodge owner.
Mr. Slevin then raised the question of a two room accommodation
unit that can be rented as one unit or as two separate rooms.
Mr. Staufer felt there should be some credit in the parking calcula-
tion for this arrangement as the two room suite is normally rented
as one unit to a family. Mayor Dobson then pointed out that the
Town of Vail may have over-reacted to the parking problem and that we
may be requiring too much parking in each case. Several alternative
solutions were proposed by the Council and by: Mr. Glover. It was
decided to work out a solution and present it on June 12 for the
Council's vote.
Mr. Glover then presented an example defining average grade. Mr.
Hibberd, a developer, then raised the question of the calculation .1f
an area well 1s provided for Light to a basement area. Mr. Glover
stated that the measurement should be to average grade rather than
to the bottom of the area well.
Gross residential floor area was then discussed and it appears that
there must be some small changes made for the definition to apply
for single family and duplex residences.
Special Meeting
June II and 12, 1973
Page 2
Article 2 - 2.503 - Larry Livingston then explained to the Council
why he feels that the "distances between buildings" section is correct
as written. He feels that this provision will serve to correct some
of the existing problems of buildings being too close together.
2.505 - The definition of gross residential floor area will be revised
for single family dwellings.
2.510 - Mr. Livingston explained why he feels that all parking should
be enclosed either in a carport or.garage. Both Mr. Donovan and Mr.
Weibel objected to carports and Mr. Donovan suggested that we make a
rule allowing no carports, Mr. Livingston pointed out that this would
be of questionable legality. Dr. Steinberg then stated that we are
trying to encourage the cluster housing approach and that attached or
covered parking destroys what we are striving to gain. It was then
decided by the Council not to require covered parking in single-family
or two-family districts.
Article 3 - 3.501 - Mr. Weibel suggested that the site size of 10,000
square feet is too small. The Council then voted to change the site
size to 15,000 square feet. They felt that the coverage of the site
might also be reduced to prevent very large duplexes.
3.510 - Covered parking will not be required.
Article 4 - 4.510 - Mr. Wright suggested that parking not be attached
or in the main building in the Low Density Multi-Family district because
of the cluster arrangement and the heavily wooded sites. The Qouncil
then voted to delete the word "attached'".
Article 5 - 5.506 - It was decided that a wall length of 1751 was
too long and would permit very large buildings, which we are trying
to prevent. Council voted to reduce the permitted wall length to
125' with a proportionally smaller diagonal.measurement.
Article 6 _ 6.506 - Permitted wall length was reduced to 1751 with
a 2251 diagonal measurement allowed.
Article 7 - 7.506 - Permitted wall length was reduced.to 175' with a
225' diagonal measurement allowed.
Article 8 - 8.200 (3) - Mayor Dobson wondered if 8;000 square feet
of allowable space for a retail shop is the correct number. Larry
Livingston then pointed out that the square footage figure was used
because there are two shops that are this large which are still in
scale with the Village. After much discussion of the appropriate
size for a retail shop, Mayor Dobson suggested that we allow the public
`to decide this matter at the public hearing. Coin-operated laundry
*--and cleaning and laundry pickup were deleted as permitted uses.
8.502 - The subject of setbacks in commercial core was again discussed.
Dr. Steinberg feels. that there should be some s..etback required to
prevent total development of a site. Mr. Glover then explained that
the Design Review Board can require a setback if it is deemed to be
necessary.
8.506 - Permitted wall length was reduced to 125r with an appropriate
diagonal measurement.
8.511 - Mayor Dobson inquired if this section would proclude street
sales such as during Vail-Fest. Mr. Livingston stated that a section
could be added to have permits issued for such things. It was also
suggested that this section be administered by the Design Review Board.
Article 9 - 9.100 Kent Rose suggested that the sentence "The District
is intended to apply only to the Lionshead protion of the Town" be
stricken as there are two other areas zoned CC2.
9.300 - Coin-operated lauddry and cleaning and laundry pickup were
deleted as permitted uses. It was suggested that these mi;ght be
retained as conditional uses.
9.606 - Permitted wa,-11 length was reduced to 1751 with a 2251 diagonal.
. Special Meeting
"'June 11 and 12, 1973
Page 3
9.607 - Site coverage was reduced to 70%.
9.609 - Landscaping was increased to 20% of the site.
Article 10 - 10.606 - After much discussion of the size of buildings
to be permitted, it was decided to leave this section as it is.
Article II - 11.300 - Every use listed as a conditional use was
considered and the following categories were stricken or modified:
(1) Animal hospitals and kennels would require soundproofing,(2) Would
remain as written, (3) Building contractorst yards will be reworded to
allow Vail Associates and the Town to store construction materials but
to prohibit general construction storage. (4) Reamins as written.
(5) Commercial storage must be deleted or limited so that ;junk yards
and related uses would not be allowed. (6) Building materials and
lumber yards must be located entirely within a structure. (7) Machine
shops would require soundproofing if necessary. (8) Motor vehicle
sales and service must be located completely within a structure.
(9) Stored vehicles in conjunction with repair shops must be completely
within a structure of screened from view. (10) Remains as written.
(11) Retreading and recapping deleted as conditional use. (1:2) Truck
service stations deleted as conditional use. (€3) Remains as written
with provision for screening storage areas from view. (14) The term
warehouse must be defined.
11.406 - The size of buildings in the Heavy Service district was
. discussed and several suggestions were made to reduce the s€ze.
Mr. Bailey then pointed out that if we require such uses as lumber yards
to be totally enclosed in a structure that we must allow buildings to
be this large.
Article 12 - 12.510 - The same parking requirement as Single Family
Residential and Two-family Residential should apply to the Agricultural
Zone.
Article 13 - 13.302 -Contour intervals are incorrect. Should be in
conformance with new topographic maps.
€3.200 - Mr. Rose inquired if the A.gricu.ltural district would remain.
Mr. Livingston started that the new' SD- I z,on i ng .wou l d apply to the
entire site for reason of control. Mayor Dobson inquired what would
happen €f only area A were developed and ar.ea.B sold to someone else,
Bob Glover rep Iyed that the SD-I district would require that the
new owner would have to comply with the development plan as submitted
by Clancy and Bradey and if they wished to do a different type of
development, a new development plan would have to be submitted.and
approved under another special development district. It was then
pointed out to the consultants that part of the original agreement
was that Clancy and Bradey would develop the entire site and maintain
it under unified management and would not sell a portion of the site.
Larry Robinson is concerned that a portion of the development will be
built and that the entire project will not be completed. He suggested
that a clause be added which would require that any portion built must
pass design review. It was also suggested that there be a requirement
for a performance bond for each portion of the structures.
Article 14 - Parking - Mr. Glover suggested a solution for parking
for dwelling units vs. accommodation units which had been discussed
previously. It was decided to require .5 p€us .I per 100 square feet
with a maximum of two spaces fora dwelling unit. An accommodation
unit would require .75 for 300 square feet plus .l for each additional
100 square feet.with a maximum of I space per accommodation unit.
Mr. White still feels that each accommodation unit should require one
space, but Mr. Staufer feels this is too many since he has times when
the Vail Village Inn is completely full and the parking lot has only
about five cars. He also raised the question of whether we want to
furnish parking for peak periods or only for.normal busy times.
x Special Meeting
June II and 12, 1973
Page 4
Article 15 - 15.200 There was a lenghty discussion about who should
be appointed to the Design Review Board and whom they should be ap-
pointed by. Mayor Dobson felt that all members of the Board should be
appointed by the Town Council and that at least three of the members
should be from the Planning Commission so that the Town staff would
not control the Board. Mr. Staufer felt that salried employees should
not have to vote on such a political board as it would make their
jobs much harder. Mr. Bailey then questioned the legality of the
Design Review Board and Mr. Livingston stated that he is 99% positive
that It will stand up in court if it is challenged. Mr. Livingston
then explained to the Council that section 15.600 is merely a guide-
line and not a hard and fast regulation. The Council then decided to
change the section to include three Planning Commission members and
two members from the community, all to be appointed by the Council.
Staff members should be non-voting members or advisory status.
Larry Robinson then questioned the appeal process. He felt that the
period alloted for appeal was not sufficient time to prepare an appeal,
The time period was increased to 14 days from the decision of the
Design Review Board and to be heard at Town Council's next regularly
scheduled meeting after the appeal is filed.
Mr. White stated that he felt the Planning Commission and the Design
Review Board should be the same people. Mr. Livingston felt that
the Planning Commission is already burdened with enough meetings and
that they would not be able to devote enough time for doing a thorough
study for each project.
The time period of two weeks from submission of plans was determined
to be too short of time in case of several sets of plans being sub-
mitted at the same time. This section was changed to read that design
review shall occur no later than 30 days from submission of plans.
Article 16 - Mr. Donovan wanted to know if the Town could control
utility lines under the environmental impact provision. Mr. Robinson
explained that the PUC has fairly tight control over theutil!ties and
they are normally not subject to local control.
16.300 - Item 4 of this section is deleted.
16.503 - A clause should be added to provide for preparation by
experts hired by the town at the expense of the developer if it is
deemed necessary by the Town staff. Staff will have the option of
preparing the environmental impact study themselves if they feel
they can do so. Add the words "to prepare or" review an environmental
impact study.
16.502 - Council can accept or reject environmental impact report.
`This section will be changed so that either staff or consultants hired
by the Town will perform the study, Council felt that developer's
consultants would be biased in their reporting. A 30 day time limit
was set for the preparation of the report if the staff performs the
study and up to six months if consultants must be hired. Time period
would be extended by the Council.
Article 17 - Mayor Dobson questioned the regulations pertaining to
fences in setback areas. He feels that sometimes the fence would be
more attractive than the object it might hide (particularly utility
boxes, etc.)
17.200 - Add the word "significant" vehicular traffic.
Article 18 and 19-- No changes,.
Article 20 - 20.900 - The last section will be changed to read: "or
shall be reviewed by the Town Manager or his staff and approved by
the Town Council".
Article 21 - 21.102 - Add Town Attorney to blank.
4k __
General - Ski lifts and tows should be added as a conditional use
in all zones. Mayor Dobson felt that size of patios should be
limited. He suggested that they be no greater than 20% of the total
floor area of a restaurant.
i . •
Page 5
ADDENDUM TO MINUTES OF JUNE 11, 1973
Prior to discussion of the proposed new zoning ordinance, the various
problems currently developing in regard to the pedestrian areas were
discussed. The history of the problem from the time of the Vail Associates
granting of private easements was discussed by Mr. Robinson. He noted
that there is a law in Colorado which addresses itself to the creation.of
pedestrian malls; for the Town to take action under its provisions, a
strictly defined set of rules for access would need to be developed. Action
under the provisions of this law would take 60 to 90 days. It was generally
agreed that proceedings under the Colorado mail law should be started,
incorporating a simple set of rules to be developed by Mr. Livingston.
Gary Wall, Police Chief, requested that he be given some direction for
the present day-to-day operation of the gate. It was generally agreed that:
1 . there should be no through traffic for sight-seeing; 2. delivery trucks
should be allowed except from 11 a. m. to 2 p. m.; 3. all traffic should
be stopped from 11 a. m. to 2 p. m.; 4. construction vehicles should prove
the necessity for entry before being admitted. Mr. Wall acknowledged
that any person desirous of going to the liquor store is at present admitted.
. Mayor Dobson suggested that the 15 minute limit with time slips be re-
activated. A final suggestion was to change some "no parking" signs to
"loading zone" and to strictly enforce the remaining "no parking" areas.
The meeting continued in discussion of the proposed new zoning ordinance
for the remainder of June 11 and throughout the meeting of June 12.
Town Clerk
•
MINUTES
REGULAR, MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JUNE 19, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:35 p.m., June 19, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Josef Staufer Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
The meeting was convened with the Council acting as the Local Liquor Licensing
Authority. Mary Joyce Senac had made application for a beer, wine and liquor
license for the premises formerly occupied by Leroi's Public House. Douglas
McLaughlin was present representing the applicant. The Town Clerk indicated
that all fees and forms had been received. Police Chief Wall indicated that
the police department had received no negative information on the applicant.
No petitions had been received for or against the application. Councilman
Donovan asked if any of the patio on the north side of the building was on green
belt land. Mr. McLaughlin noted that the question had been previously researched
and the patio was on Mr. Rosenquist's property; however, a barrier would be
placed on the patio to protect the green belt. Councilman Steinberg inquired
whether the problem with the sewer system in the restaurant had been repaired;
Mr. McLaughlin indicated that he understood it to have been corrected and
that the applicant was working with the Town Sanitarian. Councilman Donovan
moved that the license for Mary Joyce Senac be approved; Counci Iman White
seconded; approval was unanimous.
The Vail--Eagle Valley Rotary Club had made application for a 3.2% beer special
events permit for the Fourth of July. Mr. Robinson recommended the applica-
tion be approved. It was clarified by Mr. Strauch that the beer would be con-
sumed on the premises. Councilman Staufer moved the application of the Vail-
Eagle Valley Rotary Club be approved; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval
was unanimous.
is As there was no further business, the Local Liquor Licensing Authority adjourned
at 7:55 p.m. and the Town Council was convened.
Ordinance No. 8 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE TOWN OF VAI L, AND PROVIDII?
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SAME; CREATING
ZONING DISTRICTS; ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A ZONING MAP;
ESTABLISHING PARKING REQUIREMENTS; ESTABLISHING A DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD; CREATING REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORTS; PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT OF A ZONING ADMIN-
ISTRATOR; PROVIDING FOR VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE, REVIEW AND
APPEAL PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE
NO. 7 (Series of 1969), ORDINANCE NO. 8 (Series of 1970), ORDINANCE
NO. 15 (Series of 1970), ORDINANCE NO.. 3 (Series`of 1972); AND SETTING
FORTH MATTERS AND DETAI LS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced
for first reading. The title was read in full and the audience advised that
copies of the ord i nance we re avai lab le. The Mayor i nd icated that Mr. Livi ngston
would be in Vail on July 2 and'3 to discuss the ordinance with interested groups
and individuals. The second reading is scheduled for July 17. Councilman
Staufer noted that he had received a request that coin operated laundries be a
conditional use in CCII.
Z
Discussion turned to the consideration of a request for a parking variance from
Booth Creek Associates. Mr. Rose explained that, in the process of building
the road to the Booth Creek water, tank, some fill was inadvertently left on
Vail Associates' property. At this point, the Town would either have to remove
this fill or grant a variance for three parking spaces. It was his opinion that
the three spaces were not essential to the project. Also, the landscaping that
has been done in the area would suffer. Councilman Steinberg moved that a
parking variance of 3 spaces be granted to Booth Creek Associates; Council-
man Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous.
Returning to the first reading of the zoning ordinance, the Mayor polled the
Council as to whether they had read and understood the ordinance; Councilmen.
White, Staufer, Bailey, Donovan, and Steinberg indicated that they had.
Councilman Staufer moved that the proposed new zoning ordinance, No. 8
(Series of 1973), be approved; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there
were no votes against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed
to publish same. Councilman White moved that the second reading be held
at 7:30 p.m., July 17, in the Council Chambers; Councilman Bailey seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in
favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried.
Discussion of claims to rights in the streets of the Town of Vail was postponed.
It was noted that there have been no volunteers to serve on the Election Com-
mission. The Town Clerk was instructed to continue taking applications for
this commission. The minutes of the meetings of April 19, April 24 and
June 11-12, 1973, had been previously submitted to the Council. Councilman
Steinberg moved they be approved; Councilman White seconded; approval was
unanimous.
Next on the agenda was the public hearing on a proposed P.U.D, provision for
Sunburst at Vail. Mr. Minger explained the history of negotiations on the 40W-
acre tract along the golf course and the history of plan changes by the Shamrock
Vail group. Mr. Minger also reviewed the work of the planning consultants with
this group. Mr. Clancy, of Shamrock-Vail, introduced their consultants who
were present at the meeting. Mr. Jensen, their attorney, explained that they
applied for a Planned Unit Development Permit under Ordinance No. 7 (Series
of 1969) on June 1 , 1973. The land is under a.single ownership and all the
uses proposed are allowed uses. The proposed F. A.R. is 15% less than. that
allowed under the current zoning. Mr. Jensen explained the exhibits they were
submitting with their application. He also noted that the Shamrock-Vail group
accepted the recommendations of the Town of Vail planners made up to and
including June 18. A slide presentation was made of various aspects of their
plan. Mr. Seracuse, their architect, noted that the total number of units
. contemplated was 585. A memorandum dealing with the project from Eldon
n their This
proposal and the recommendations was due to a difference in method of measure-
ment. However, the number of floors did not differ. In regard to the schedule
of credits for recreational amenities, Mr. Clancy was of the opinion that the
Council would prefer that the matter be negotiated at the beginning of each phase
rather than at this time. The fact that some of the items might receive no
credit would not be troublesome to the developers, with the exception of the
multi-media center, which they felt required a credit. Mr. Seracuse explained
the phasing of the buildings with a view to showing that each of them could stand
alone should the project be hatted at any point before completion. Councilman
Donovan inquired if Council approval would travel with the land; if the land were
sold, would it need to be reviewed again? Mr. Robinson was of the opinion
that the selling of the land would not affect the .approval. A lso, any new owners
would be required to follow the agreed upon plan. In regard to the amount of
Minger., - who also commented that the
memorandum was summarized by Mr. eir
option that the land remain open space was not available. It was also noted that
Beck Mr. of RSeracuseoyston, explained Hanamoto!, that the Beck, & apparent Abey discrepancy had been submitted to heights Counci between I.
any future construction projects in the Town will be required to submit an
environmental impact report.
-2
density reduction, Mr. Clancy noted that the parking arrangements of the new
ordinance have enabled them to reduce the density.by 15% while maintaining
the same level of amenities. It was repeated that 585 units (11.7 of which are
hotel units) are contemplated, with 2300 to 2400, people at 100% occupancy.
The original number of people contemplated for the project was 3,400. The
first phase would be 73 units housing 242 people and 5,700 square feet of
. commercial space. Mr. Clancy reported that they had contracted for 24
rental units in West Vail for employees for the first two' seasons; after that
time, the employee housing units wilt be constructed.
It was clarified that the application is being made under the old zoning ordinance;
however, the application is identical to Section 13 of the proposed new zoning
ordinance and the developers have agreed to abide by this section. Mr. Gersbach
inquired if the new zoning ordinances were available prior to that afternoon; Mr.
Minger noted that they have been available for some time although recently--
changed sections were only available that morning. Mr. Robinson noted that if
the project is given approval, it could only be re-zoned if it could be shown.that
conditions had changed substantially. Mr. Frank noted that in order to avoid
the situation that exists in Lionshead, where amenities were shown in prospectus'
but never built, it would be necessary to obtain some type of guarantee of amenity
construction. Mr. Robinson explained that by using a P.U.D. approach, dead-
tines can be set by which time certain amenities must be completed; if these
deadlines are not met, sanctions are available to be imposed. Mr. McLaughlin
inquired how many units were contemplated per buildable acre; Mr. Seracuse
indicated that they did not have that figure. However, it is not true that a
majority of the site is unbuildable. Mr. McLaughlin maintained that because
this figure is not available the density calculations are misleading.. Mr. Minger
noted that the original allowable density was .7 or .8 to 1; the current proposal
is .4 to 1 .
Mr. George Knox questioned whether the sewer system could adequately handle
the volume generated by this project. Mr. Rose replied that the Water and
Sanitation District has contracted for a plant expansion which will triple the
capacity of the plant; this work hopefully will be completed by November 15.
In addition, the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District, which handles some
Vail sewerage, is expanding. Councilman Donovan inquired as to the current
status of the UEVS plant. Mr. Rose noted that they are currently over-capacity
due to infiltration.
Eve Nott suggested that the quantitative impact on the golf course area would be
overwhelming. She inquired who was responsible for the original zoning of the
property as non-residential. Mayor Dobson indicated that the Council had
allowed some commercial uses, as the annexation would not have taken place
. had the zoning not been acceptable to the owners. The question before them at
the course which might be taken by the owners if the P. U . D. provision were
not granted would be to sell the land to others in small pieces. Councilman
Staufer noted that when the subject of a moratorium was discussed, it was
rejected by the audience in attendance; hence, the only alternative is controlled
development.
the time was whether to annex and gain some control or not annex at all. Mrs.
Nofit suggested that the annexation had not been publicized. Mayor Dobson took
exception to this statement; it had been publicized, although the public may not
have attended to participate. Mr. Kindel inquired if the developers were
prepared to take longer than 6 years to complete the project, Mr. Clancy
indicated that they had looked at 7 - 10 year alternatives. Mr. Anderson
inquired if the Cour>cil had examined, the financial condition of the developers.
Mr. Robinson suggested that there might be no legal way to conduct such
investigations. A member of the audience suggested that :provisions should
be added to the P. U. D. arrangement whereby it can be changed. He also sug-
gested that a surety band arrangement was necessary to guarantee the public
open space. Mr. Minger agreed that performance or surety bond provisions
should be added to the agreement. Another member of the audience suggested
that an escrow account would be the-.only way to provide protection. Council-
man Steinberg suggested that one guarantee of performance was the -.need of
the developer to obtain permits each year, which permits would not be issued
if the standards had not been met, Councilman Steinberg also clarified that
-3-
a
.
•
•
NAr. Blumberg asked what the plans were for the commercial space. There
would be 60,000 square feet of commercial space, built on a phase basis.
The allowable uses are listed both in the permit application and in the. Section
13 of the proposed new zoning ordinance. The square footage given also
includes the multi-media center. Mr. Blumberg noted that this commercial
space might generate a great deal of'traffic. Mr. Lou Parker asked. if there
were a referendum procedure applicable to this project. Mr. Robinson replied
that had an ordinance been required to approve the project, a referendum
could have been applied. A member of the audience inquired if there were
three alternatives; 1 . approve the project as presented; 2. approve other
buildings; or 3. just leave it open. Mayor Dobson reported that these were
not the alternatives; the land has been purchased and it cannot be zoned in..
such a way as to deprive the owners of their rights to- the land. A member
of the audience suggested that there.is not room for 2100 people in the Town.
Councilman Staufer suggested that in that case it also be considered that
there are 200 to 300 acres in Bighorn which are not controlled and from which,
if developed, additional people will come into town. The member of the audience
suggested that the controls in this case:were'.not being strictly enough enforced,
Mayor Dobson suggested that they could not limit this project further and still
be within the law. After some further discussion, Councilman White suggested
that the only alternative at this point is for the Town to condemn and purchase
the property. Mr. Bob Parker expressed three concerns; 1 . that the trans-
portation system operate as projected; .2.' that a proper relationship be
established between the. golf course and the project; 3. that a proper rela-
tionship be established with the ski facilities. It was his opinion that the
recreational facilities provided in the project are not those upon which it will
depend. He was concerned as to -how they would finance their transportation
system. Mr. Parker felt it was necessary to establish a way in which the
people of Vail can also have access to the golf course. Likewise, he felt it
would be necessary to establish priorities between existing residents and guests
and new people on the mountain. Mr. Clancy noted that the transportation
system was bound by the same type of agreements as the amenities. They can
either use a private source of financing or finance it through the project itself.
In regard to the ski facilities, he noted that they have. looked at these on a
regional basis, Mayor Dobson added that,. in regard to the golf course, this
would have to be handled by the Recreation District but that all citizens would
have to have a relatively equal access. to it. The problems with the ski facility
were, likewise, not within the purview of the Council.
Marion Frank noted that she was in favor of a large corporation developing the
property as they are more likely to build the amenities and could possibly raise
the necessary funds more easily. .Councilman White suggested that the Couricii..
pursue performance bonds for each phase of this project and every project being
built in the Town. Mr. Robinson suggested that if-the Council. were not prepared
to act on the application at this time., the public hearing should be continued to
another time. Councilman Bailey noted that his only hesitation centered on the
comments made by Mr. Beck regarding supporting materials. Councilman
Donovan stated that he was in favor of continuing the hearing to the next meeting
Councilman Steinberg agreed. Councilman White noted that he thought the
recreation fee question needed to be settled before approval was :given. Mr.
Clancy offered to give: the town a letter of credit at the beginning of each
construction season for the items scheduled for that phase. Mr. Jensen stated
that it would be helpful if they could have prreiiminary approval, subject to the
items which the Council had mentioned. Mayor Dobson suggested that all of
the concerns could not be listed Within the next 10 minutes. After some dis-
cussion, it was suggested that the project could be approved subject to the
suggestions of Mr. Beck and letters of credit arrangements. Mr. Clancy
clarified that they would include the amenities in any performance bond arrange-
ment; he had no objections to including the transportation, but the detalls of.
its financing have not yet been worked out. After some further discussion,
Councilman Bai ley moved that the Council approve the proposed P. U. D. provi-
sion for the Sunburst at Vail project subject to the findings of Mr. Beck
written on June 16 and to an arrangement for a satisfactory performance bond
or letter of credit to cover the landscaping and amenities as presented in the
plan, such approval to be subject to a satisfactory meeting of the conditions
within 7 days. Councilman Steinberg seconded the motion. Councilmen Bailey,'
Donovan, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no
votes against; the motion carried.
_ 1
S
The VRA had submitted a list of the projects they would like to undertake in
conjunction with the Town. This v?o uld. require the $8,000 which had been
earmarked for that organization in the budget. Councilman Staufer moved
that the $8,000 be allocated to the VRA; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval
was unanimous.
In regard to the re-modeling of the old sewer plant A-frame, it will be used
this summer although a long-term commitment is still pending. Jen Wright
indicated that Vail Associates would have more information within two weeks.
The estimated total cost would be $20,000. After some. further discussion,
Councilman Donovan moved that $3,000 be allocated to make the building
usable for the summer; Councilman Steinberg seconded; approval was
unanimous.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved that the meeting
adjourn at 11:30 p.m.; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk
r
-5-
r
1
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCI L OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
JUNE 25, 1973
./ A work session of the Town Council of the Town of'\/ail was con\/e ned at
10:20 a.m., June 25, 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail Municipal
~ Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
Tom Steinberg
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Dan Herrington, Boettcher & Co.
Mr. Herrington was present to discuss municipal bonding capacities. He
explained that it would be possible for the Town to issue either General
Obligation Bonds or Sales Tax Revenue Bonds. The interest on the general
obligation bonds would be 1/2% lower. However, such a bond based on the
property tax mill levy would be politically difficult. If the sales tax were
used, an additional 1 cent tax would be necessary. Mr. Herrington men-
tioned that, if the growth of the Town continued, the current issue could be
structured in such a way that other bonds could be issued in the future on
the same basis. Mr. Minger suggested that a combination of sales tax and
general obligation would be the best. Mr. Herrington concurred that the
provision that the revenues would come from sales tax would add the flexi-
bility of using parking structure revenues.
Mr. Herrington suggested that the ballot would contain at least two questions,
one for each project, the need for a separate question for the sales tax increase
has not yet been decided. Without the additional cent sales tax, the necessary
funds would only be barely available if everything was at its best, and these
bonds would be difficult to sell. With the additional cent sales tax, the general
obligation capacity would still be available in the future If there were any
monies remaining from the additional cent, it could either be put in the general
fund, tied to certain projects, or used to accelerate debt service.
• In regard to whether the Recreation District has the financial capacity to build
an ice rink, Mr. Herrington was of the opinion that they could. Mr. Minger
noted that if the Town decided to build this facility, the plans would not be
detailed enough by the time of the bond election to include it at that time. After
some further discussion, the Council agreed that the bond election was moving
in the right direction.
In regard to the Sunburst project, Mr. Minger noted that they have submitted
a proposed P.U.D. permit. Councilman Steinberg inquired if they were willing
to re-negotiate credits and projects in the future. Mr. Minger noted that they
are willing to do this. There was general agreement that a meeting should be
held at 10:00 a. m. on June 20. In regard to attempts to overthrow the decision
of the Council on this matter, Mr. Robinson noted that a referendum is not pos-
sible as the permit does not take the form of an ordinance; it is possible, how-.
ever, that an initiative ordinance might be proposed.
Mr. Robinson noted that the owners of the Rich condominium complex are of the
opinion that they should be exempt from the recreation fee. He suggested that
the Council consider whether the guarantee of the zoning ordinance and building
code for this group also included an exemption from this type of fee.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:15 p. m.
l own C ierk
MINUTES
REGULAR ME'E'TING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
JULY 3, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 7:30 P.M., July 3, 1973, in the Council Chambers of. the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
Laurence B. Robinson, Town Attorney.
Larry Livingston, San Franc.isco'planner
The Mayor opened the meeting by stating the first item on the agenda
was a discussion of the proposed zoning ordinance. He then introduced
Larry Livingston, who was present to make a general statement and answer
any questions regarding the ordinance. The Mayor turned the meeting
over to Terry Minger, Town Manager, for his comments before beginning
to read the ordinance.
Mr. Minger stated, with regard to the zoning ordinance, that, first,
the Building Department and the Town Staff had put together an inven-
tory of all existing buildings in terms of mass,=size, location and
type of use, etc., and determined what the positive and negative points
of each building were, in order to re-evaluate the old ordinance,
especially with regard to the F.A.R. ratio. Secondly, the day-to-day
types of problems, weaknesses and inconsistencies of the old ordinance
were examined. Thirdly, it was noted that the most important thing
omitted from the old ordinance was a section dealing with the environ-
ment, and that they had been focusing on the type of impact that develop-
ment has on our environment (such as vegetation, avalanche, flood, air
and quality kind of life). Fourthly,.a Design Review section was being
incorporated into the new ordinance in order to consolidate architectural
review and design review, including graphics, signs, architecture and
landscape.
Mr. Larry Livingston.gave some brief comments regarding the situation
in Vail and the need for a new ordinance. He stated that the scale
of the Village Core was good and an ideal situation for a pedestrianized
area with transportation center. He noted that a difficulty arose because,
instead of a single core in the Village, there was also another core in
Lionsffead, but the idea of a public transportation system between the
two cores would h6p solve the problem. He also noted that the biggest
change in the ordinance was a reduction in the permitted intensity of a
building, so as to avoid the recurrence of a development in the scale
of LionsHead. He also mentioned the addition of the Design Review pro-
cedure, which will insure design quality And environmental impact of
future development. It was also noted by Mr. Livingston that the
ordinance had been developed in two phases; .first, the zoning district
regulations, and second, the staff review. After the suggested changes
of the staff had been made, Mr. Livingston and Mr. Bob Glover had 2 full
day sessions with the Town Council. with'regaxd to the changes, and the
official first reading of the ordinance was made on June 19th.
The Mayor began to read.the Zoning Ordinance by Articles, and asked
if there were any questions as to each article.
Mr. Bob Nott of Vail Associates asked if any graphic illustrations of
the various zoning districts had been prepared, in order to see how
buildings looked in relation to slope, etc. The Mayor answered that
nothing by way of graphics had been prepared however, Mr..Larry Livingston
noted that he had some sketches of height relations as to average grade
and that they could be xeroxed.
Mr. Ben Frank made a statement that the Town had done an excellent job
in attempting to control growth within legalities, but that he felt
some sort of control or performance bond on a developer should be written
into the zoning ordinance, along with a performance bona" with regard to
such things as recreational amenities, etc. Mr.. Robinson said this was
covered in Article 13 and.the F.U.D. Mr. Livingston did feel, howe9,'6r,
that some sort of bond could be incorporated into the zoning ordinance.
Councilman White also agreed that the incorporation of a performance
bond into the zoning ordinance should be pursued. Mr. Amato asked if the sub-
division ordinance would have to be reworked,.and Mr. Livingston. replied
that it did need some minor adjustments.
Mr. Jerry Dooher, a landowner on the golf course, posed a question as
to Article 13.301 regarding access and a transportation system at the
"Sunburst" project. He noted that one of the conditions imposed on the
developer was provision for a transportation system rather than the use
of the individual automobile and asked if the bus schedule at Sunburst
was to run every 2 minutes on the access road. Mr. Minger replied that
the agreement between the -Town and Sunburst was that the intervals would.
be no longer than 2 minutes. He advised Mr. Dooher that the concept had
been to minimize traffic and land use. Mr. Dooher questioned if there
were any plans for other access to the Sunburst development. Mr. Livingston
replied that Mr. Beck had studied the problem of access and cannot come
up with any other route which would not be devastating.
Attorney Doug McLaughlin asked if the contract agreement between the Town
and Sunburst were available to the public, and Mr. Minger replied that it
was available.
Mr. Bob Nott asked how many buses would be used and where they would be
stored on the Sunburst property. Mr. Minger answered that there was a
maximum of 6 buses, depending on the size of the bus, which would be
stored in their underground parking facility.
• With regard to Article 14, Mr. Bill Bauer felt that the parking require-
ments for individual restaurants (l space for every 4 seats or 60 square
feet) were too high. The Council is giving consideration to changing the
parking requirements for CCI and CCII, but the HDMF and PA zones will
remain unchanged.
Attorney McLaughlin wanted to know shat consideration had been given to
Colorado law regarding off-street parking requirements, and stated that
most off-street parking requirements would be unconstitutional. It was
replied that there are many ordinances requiring off--street parking in
Colorado and that to not have such a requirement is a worse situation.
Mr. McLaughlin felt that some sort of contractual bond was needed to
require off-street parking. Also, with regard to parking requirements,
Mr. Bob Nott felt that in a LDMF district (townhouse), the requirement
for 50% parking under cover was unreasonable in that it would lend itself
to covered carports and that proper landscaping would be a better solution
to the problem.
•
page 2
in regard to Article 15.600, Design Guidelines, Mr. John Amato questioned
the use of the term "should" as opposed to "shall". Mr. Livingston advised
that the word "should" was used as the Design Review Board needed some sort
of criteria to use as guidelines, -- which guidelines are not mandatory.
in regard to Article 16, Environmental Impact Study, Mr. Bob Nott questioned
whether the environmental impact study should be applied to single family
duplex and townhouse zoning districts. He felt the requirement should be
at the time of platting and not at the time of subdivision, so'as to avoid
passing it on to the buyer. It was suggested that an environmental impact
report done at the subdivision level could have an expiration date.
However, Councilman Donovan noted his feeling that the ordinance should
not be changed. Mr. Livingston proposed.that the conditions of the study
could be met by use of a checklist for a simple project; however, it was
pointed out that the ordinance did not con-tain a provision for a checklist
and that the procedures of enforcement were not spelled out in the ordinance.
Mx. Livingston noted that this section would be studied further in order
to set forth criteria to govern Council's approval or rejection of a project.
Mr. Livingston also no tied that there had been no comments on Articles 1
through 12 and that it might be of interest to note the reductions in
intensity. Diana Toughi ll has a document setting forth the specific
figures, which is available to anyone interested.
Mr. John Amato asked if there was a new map of the proposed zoning districts,
and the mayor pointed out the present zoning map, which is the same, with
the exception of the SD-1 zone.
The Mayor advised that the second reading of the proposed zoning ordinance
will be conducted at the regular meeting of the Town Council at 7:30 P.M.
on July 17, 1973, and thanked Mr. Livingston for his assistance.
The second item on the agenda was the reading of the proposed sign ordinance.
Mr. Minger advised that there were some matters which needed to be changed
and that there would be insufficient time for publishing of the ordinance.
He stated that there will be a formal reading as soon as possible and
suggested that anyone interested should obtain a copy of the ordinance
and make any comments or suggestions he feels necessary.
The third item on the agenda was the vacancy on the Planning Commission;
it was noted that three applications had been received for said vacancy,
which will be reviewed by the Council.
. Fourth on the agenda was the reading of the minutes of meetings on
May 15, 1973 and June 5, 1973. Councilman Bailey noted a change in
paragraph 5 of the minutes of May Z'5, 1973, -- from 9' by 8'8" to
"9' by 18'". Councilman Steinberg moved to approve the minutes, with
the above correction noted; Councilman Donovan seconded; approval was
unanimous.
At this point, Mr. John Amato asked the Council if anything had been done
with regard to the problem of easement rights on the streets of the Vail
Village Core and at the Checkpoint Charley gate. Mr. Robinson advised
him that other matters have pre-empted this problem, but that the
Council has been giving it consideration. The Mayor advised Mr. Amato
that they would have an answer for him within the next two weeks.
The fifth item on the agenda was a report from Rod Slifer, Recreation
District Board Chairman, on the Ice Arena Status. Mr. Slifer began by
advising that there had been a couple meetings between the Recreation
District and the Town Council regarding feasibility of &" multi-purpose
ice skating arena and that the Recreation District has an active committee
working on the matter. It had not yet been determined who should be
•
page. 3
responsible, the Town or the Recreation District, for the building of
an ice arena. Several consultants, Walter Bush, Bob McNulty and Eddie.
Shipstead had attended the last meeting, with the result that Mr. McNulty
advised that his firm could do a feasibility/cost study for a fee of
$4,500. Mr. Slifer recommended, on behalf of the Recreation District,
that Mr. McNulty's firm be retained to do the study. Councilman Bailey
expressed his opinion that the Town should proceed and retain Mr. McNulty
to do the study, appropriating Town funds for the same. Councilman White
stated that Mr. McNulty's firm was not only able to prepare a feasibility
study, but is also in a position to do the construction. There was some
discussion regarding the location of the proposed arena and the possibility
of the Anholtz property. Mr. Dick Elias felt that if the. study were
prepared on the basis of the use of the Anholtz property; the.money should
not be spent for such a study. He was advised that the study was not tied
down to any particular piece of property. There was also a question.of
whether or not the community had been consulted on priorities for such a
multi-use facility, and Mayor Dobson responded that there had been a
tremendous amount of citizen input. After some further discussion,
Councilman Donovan moved that the Town appropriate $4,500 to retain Mr.
Bob McNulty to prepare a feasibility/cost study; Councilman Bailey
seconded; and the motion was carried.
The sixth item on the agenda were reports for the Town Manager:
(a) Mr. Minger announced that World Odyssey, Inc. had asked the Town
for permission to operate a kayaking venture.on the pond near the Creek-
side Building. After some discussionjregarding the number of,kayaks to
be in operation, along with the number of supervisors present, questions
of liability and the use of waivers or releases, legality questions as
to possession of the property, Council felt contingent approval be granted
with conditions of.safety requirements and study of legal requirements to
be worked out by the Town Attorney. Councilman Staufer moved that such
approval be granted; Councilman Bailey seconded; and the motion was carried.
(b) Mr. Minger presented the Annual Report for the Vail Public Library
for the year 1972 showing an increase in volumes and efficiency. He
advised that Annette Milliron had resigned as Librarian and that the
Town is in the process of reviewing applications for the hiring of a
new librarian. He also asked for suggestions for improving the library
service. Copies of the Annual Report are available to the public.
(c) Mr. Minger advised that preliminary negotiations had begun regarding
the Cable TV franchise; the present franchisee has been asked to respond
• to the Town's proposals by mid-July. The public will be invited to attend
any formal negotiations as soon as they are commenced. The possibility of
other companies was suggested; however, no action may be taken until the
present franchisee responds to the Town's.negotiat'ons. Rates, along with
performance, will be discussed. Mr. Dick Elias noted that if the fran-
chisee delays the Town. in negotiations, his group will request arbitration
in order to receive an-answer from the: cable. company by September.
(d) Mr. Minger discussed the Town Bicycl;e.Program, which is the use of
bicycles to conserve gas for such things as meter reading, etc.
(d) With regard to the plaza/fountain area in front of the Creekside
Building, Mr. Minger asked direction from the Council. A budget of
$15,000 was proposed, excluding the cost of a sculpture. Mr. Ben Frank
offered to donate a marble sculpture to the Town. The Council suggested
that construction not be commenced until after Labor Day in September.
LJ
page 4
I .
Mr. Minger also suggested that any interested citizens and the press
contact him to have a walking tour of the master plan area before its
presentation on duly 12, in order to receive comments from the community
regarding the master plan.
After some discussion regarding publication of bond regulations, a
motion was made by Councilman Staufer setting a bond election for Tuesday,
August 21, 1973 and to commence publication of notice for registration
of election; seconded by Councilman Bailey; unanimous vote.
A question was raised by Hemmie Westbye regarding the Sunburst project
as to why citizens were not properly informed and why such a substantial
amount of commercial space had been allowed., in view of the fact that
the LionsHead area was just beginning and was not being given a chance
to catch up. Jerry Dooher also raised the question as to why the Sunburst
project had not been publicized more intensely:' Mr. Minger then read.a
list of meetings re the Pulis property going back to August 4, 1969,
including dates on which registered letters had been set to the property
owners. It was also pointed out that at the time of annexation, LionsHead
did not exist, except for the Gondola Building. Mr. john Anato•pointed
out that the Town had crone the best they "could in annexing the property;-
and imposing regulations and requirements, as opposed to leaving the
property outside the Town limits without..any requirements, He also
noted that it was much easier to develop in the County than within the
Town limits. He went on to say that no public hearings are required on
annexation, and zoning can be done without public meetings; and the
community should take into consideration that the Town found it more
desirable to annex the property and impose regulations. Mr. Hans Weibel
questioned why the land had not been purchased by the Town, and the Mayor
replied that he did not think a Town could purchase land to prohibit
development. Attorney Doug McLaughlin agreed that it is not Iegi;timate
to purchase land to avoid development; however, he felt the land could
be condemned for parklands.
Mr. Dick Elias noted, with regard to the Anholtz property, a rumor that
there will, be a trade-off of land with Vail Associates to accommodate
200-400 condominiums and a chairlift. The Mayor responded that the Town
has not, and is not, negotiating with Vail Associates for a land trade-off.
Mr. Hans Weibel asked what the Vail Institute was; the Mayor replied that
the Board of Directors was in the process of preparing a statement for
the press regarding the Vail Institute. He also advised that the Vail
Institute was a corporation organized in the State of Colorado, seeking
tax--exempt status as a non-profit corporation. He stated that the purpose
of the Vail Institute is to sponsor ongoing cultural events and activities
within the Town. It was also questioned whether the.Town was connected
with the Institute and whether or not any Town funds were involved in the
Institute. The Mayor answered that there was no .connection and no money
involved, but that the Town staff had been used to help form the Institute...
- Mr. Weibel questioned whether 2% of the franchise money of the Cable TV
will go to a private corporation, -- the Vail Institute. The Mayor
replied that he knew nothing in that regard. Mr. Jim Lamont answered
that part of the negotiations, which are available to the public, proposed
a means by which the cable company would contribute to public service
(? [:3'
broadcasting within the community, but that this was merely a concept
with which they were dealing.
•
pa ge 5
Mr. Weibel then asked why Vail Associates was allowed to use helicopters
to fly over the Town with construction materials in order to build their
lift towers. Mr. Minger replied that it was correct that Vail Associates
was using helicopters to build their lift towers, but that he did not feel
the towers could be constructed in any other manner which would not cause
damage to the environment..
The Mayor concluded the meeting by pleading with the community to have
faith in the Council members and the Master Plan.
As there was no further business to come before the meeting, the meeting
was adjourned at 11:15 P.M.
7bwn Clerk
/nmm
•
•
C?
pa ge. 6
l1
,r
i
i ¦ 1
box l oo r Vail, colorado $ 1657 • 303. 476-561 3
MEMO
TO: TERRELL J. MINCER
FROM: BOB MANZANARES
RE: KAYAKING GROUP
DATE : JUNE-26 1973
Chuck McLaughlin an Bruce Bistli? have approached the Town for per-
mission to use the dam on Gore Creek for a kayaking venture, which
0 apparently they ran last year.
They would like to start their business as soon as the high waters
subside, and the dam gets set up and remain open until Labor Day.
They propose to have it closely supervised, Bistline having a lifeguard
certificate, etc. They also are willing to clean up the general area,
shore, and also the stream, if any garbage is thrown into it.
I discussed, that if permission was granted, the Town would require
insurance absolving us from any liability, which they agreed to do.
Also, that we would have someone supervising them, which was also
agreeable to them,
0 I think they will be agreeable to any Town directive deemed necessary.
If you approve of this activity, I can set it up similar to the
Archery Range.
What do you think?
li
•
•
;r
To: City Council
City of Vail
Vail, Colorado
From= World Odyssey Inc.
Vail., Colorado
Re: Use of the Mid-Town Pond on Gore Creek.
June 28, 1973
We propose to use the dammed area located to the Northwest
of the Creekside Building, herein refered to as the Pond, for
kayaking instruction and boat rental between the hours of 10am
and 5pm on a daily basis through August 1973. Last Year this pond
was used, by us, for these purposes, and no major problems
resulted.
We are willing to concede that the major component of our
customers are children, and as such we intend to institute the
fbllowing safety measures.
1) A supervisor shall be attending the pond during all
hours of operation. Said supervisor shall be a certified Red
Cross Senior Lifesaver and shall be knowledgeable of the special
safety problems related to kayaking.
2) No child younger than 7 years old shall be allowed to use
a kayak.
3) A rope shall be strung across the pond about 10 yards
above the dam, such that a child who has lost control of his
craft might easily secure a grip on said rope and arrest his
his drifting motion until help arrives.
4) It should be pointed out that the movement of water
in the Pond is very slow and the aforementioned drifting motion
is never great enough to represent a prohibitive danger to even
the most inexperienced boater.
5) Out of bounds will be set such that boaters wIl.l1always
be visible to the supervisor,
In return for the use of the Pond, World Odysseys Inc. agrees
to be responsible for picking up all trash either in the Pond or
on the grass fringe. Furthermore should the grass fringe be
damaged as a detect result of our program, either by boats or
by customers, we agree to replace said damaged grass. Futhermore?
the parents or guardians of all participants shall be required
to sign waivers which would release the City of Vail from
responsibility in the event of an accident or in the event of
negligence on the part of World Odyssey Inc. or its employees.
It is our belief that this proposed program is of /real
value to both the visitors to and residents of Vail. In a sense
we provide a child supervision and amusement service. Last year
this program was extremely succesfull, and as such we feel that it
merits consideration for permission to continue.
World Odyssey Inc.
by
ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE VAIL PUBLIC LIBRARY
March 1, 1972 to December 31, 1972
The Vail Public Library (VPL) was in operation only nine months
of the past year. However, during those nine months, much has been
accomplished. From March 20th, the date the library officially
opened for the public use, to date, VPL has received the support
of the community. The use of the library is quite heavy and has
been increasing daily.
The number of books presently on the shelves in the VPL is approx-
imately 10,000. This figure includes those books shelved in the
"free exchange" paperback section. The number of adult and juvi-
nile books checked out during the March 20th to December 31st
period was 11,452. The number of "free exchange" paperbacks' cir-
culated during that time is estimated to be 6,000. When these
two figures are totalled and averaged, the average number of books
circulated per week was 425 and the average daily was 73. (See
Appendix, page one.) There are other materials that are circu-
lated by the library such as magazines, newspapers, maps, non-book
pictures, and other non-book material. As of December 15th, I
is started breaking down the circulation figures so that I could better
judge the areas of heaviest use. (See Appendix, page two.) These
circulation reports will be used monthly from this point forward
since they are so very revealing.
2
VPL was granted a budget of $12,750. The library spent $14,666,
$1,916 over the budget. This excess amount was covered by the
General Fund. A complete breakdown of this budget can be found
on page three of the Appendix
VPL is a member of the Three Rivers Library System. It is through
this system that the library gains access to the statewide Inter-
Library Loan Network. There have been 295 requests sent out on
this system during the nine months of operation. Most of the
requests have been filled quickly and with adequate materials.
Unfortunately, there have been a few slow responses but when one
considers the size of the networks the number of slip-ups are very
minimal.
•
There were 795 library card holders as of December 31st. There are
approximately 25 new cards issued weekly. Cards are issued to any
resident of Eagle County or to any property owner in Eagle County.
The library is open to the public 38 hours per week. The State
Library requires that a public library serving a population of
0 to 2,500 must be open 15 hours per week in order to be a "library
in good standing." I, fortunately, do have some volunteers to
help cover the circulation desk so that I may be free to work on
other projects in the library. The majority of volunteers help
with checking books both in and out, filing, shelving and other
menial library tasks. I am also fortunate that Michi Blake has
been helping with the cataloging as a volunteer. With her help
I have been able to catalog nearly 1,000 books so far. Having
3
someone to help me has proven to me the importance the addition of
a full-time assistant makes. The library is receiving a 50? subsidy
from the Three Rivers Library System for every book that is cataloged.
The time donated to the library by Michi in December was primarily
spent typing catalog cards. The progress that was made in December
is more than double that made in November. (See Appendix, page four.)
The library has also been receiving book and cash donations as well
as labor donations. The cash donations have not been overwhelming
yet, but as the library grows and more people become acquainted with
it, I'm sure the donations will increase. Also a few residents of
the community have donated subscriptions to periodicals. The library
is receiving Colorado Magazine, Nationa.l'Geographic, Natural History,
a and the Manchester Guardian through such donations. The book
donations have been overwhelming. In fact, the majority of the
10,000 books on the shelves have come through donations. The $3,000
book budget allows us to purchase 600 books, figuring an average
price of $5.00 per book. In actuality the library purchased nearly
1,000 books this year, however a large portion of the books are
paperback. A paperback collection is acceptable but not lasting.
Paperbacks do not hold together through as many circulations as do
hardbound books but in our case paperbacks are necessary to facili-
tate the selection of titles requested by the patrons. Hopefully,
one day the paperback copies will be supplemented by hardbound books
either through donation or purchase. A paperback and hardbound
copy of most titles would be ideal since there are patrons who
prefer one over the other.
4
Another cash and labor donation was made to the library by the
community project of the Vegas at Vail Benefit. The amount of
cash earned at this benefit is undetermined at this date. The
most encouraging and heartening aspect of the benefit was the
support of the community for the library, ski club and tennis
program. A majority of the local merchants made merchandise
donations which were auctioned and raffled off for cash. Innumerable
people donated hours of their personal time to help in, making the
evening possible. The Town of Vail also saved the project when a
last minute problem arose about a location. The benefit was well
attended and enjoyed by all. The cash donation which will come
from this benefit will be evaluated at the time of receipt to
determine where it can best be utilized.
0 This year the library also received a grant of $300.00 from the
State Library through the Three Rivers System, to use for pur-
chasing reference books. Most of the books purchased with this
money fall into the "ready reference" area. "Ready reference"
books include dictionaries, encyclopedias, atlases, indexes which
are quite expensive. This grant enabled VPL to expand its ready
reference collection so that many of the common reference questions
could be answered without calls or inquiries being sent to other
libraries. This service has noticeably improved public opinion
of the library. The number of reference questions coming into the
library has increased since we can answer many of them on the spot.
In addition to the reference grant VPL received a $50.00 grant
5
from the State Library through the Three Rivers System with which
to buy government documents. The government documents purchased
with this grant are becoming the nucleus for the library's verticle
46 file. A verticle file is a file of Pictures> P:amPhlets, leaflets
and other empherial materials which are useful but are difficult
to catalog and store on the shelves. The project is moving slowly
at the moment, since it has been started from scratch. The pam-
phlets are sorted and placed into folders. The folders are then
given a relevant subject heading from Reader's Guide to Periodical
Literature. Then when a patron requests some information on pocket
gopher control, since the library doesn't have a book on the sub-
ject, a pamphlet printed by the government can be located in the
verticle f':ile. It is quite a time consuming project at this point
. but is one that I know will prove to be very useful.
There is another project that I have been working on which will be
quite useful to VPL. It is the establishment of an Eagle County
Library. There has been one meeting held to date at which little
was decided. Hopefully, the next meeting will produce better
results. It is an excellent idea to get started on a county li-
brary now before Eagle County grows muo?h larger. I feel that we
as a community should help as much as can in the organization of
the library as we will definitely benefit from the growth of another
strong library in the county. Presently, there are small but rather
inadequate public libraries in Redcliff, Eagle, Gypsum, and Sweet-
water. If a strong county library existed it could bolster the
service offered in these communities as well as supplement the
service offered in Vail.
6
I have attended several other meetings these last few months. Instead
of enumerating each, I would rather praise the two which have been
most useful to me in directing the library. The first was a three
day workshop held at Colorado Mountain College in Glenwood Springs.
Anne Matthews from the University of Denver was the instructor at
that meeting.
She helped point out many pitfalls that we all could avoid for our
small isolated libraries. For example, it was. on her recommendation
that I decided to purchase the complete as opposed to the abridged
Reader's Guide to Periodicals. Her reasoning being if you don't
have the periodical on hand you can get a copy through Interlibrary
Loan. It was so very helpful just being able to ask her questions
and to hear the questions and problems of the other libraries. Also
there was a presentation by Virginia Anderson, the Garfield County
Librarian, on Colorado books. It was most helpful to view the books
and be able to pick out which ones were needed in the VPL. It.was
at this meeting that I reviewed many reference books and decided
which ones would be most useful to VPL.
The second meeting was the three day Colorado Library Association
Convention held in Colorado Springs. There were so many new
exciting ideas presented at that meeting. It really lifts a
person just to go see and hear what other libraries are doing and
what other librarians are thinking. I was given an excellent idea
by Sara Tappan, a Denver Public Librarian, on our problem of
quickly cataloging a fairly large collection. She suggested making
a temporary title card with a broad subject heading instead of
using.a call number which would indicate the location of the book.
Then when I had time I could go back and completely catalog the
book, assigning the proper L.C. call number and subject heading.
Until then library patrons would have access to the book by title
and when they saw the subject heading they would then know where
to find that particular book. I plan to use the assistant given
to the library on this project immediately so that a better record
of the books in the library will be available. Attending meetings
like these two is so very useful that I hope to attend as many as
I possibly can.
There have been a few other community projects in which the library
• has been involved during the past year. VPL has worked closely
with Colorado Mountain College in many different ways to try to
help satisfy some of the intellectual needs of the community.
During the Summervail Workshop, VPL obtained approximately. 300
books to be used by the students of the various classes. These
books were loaned to VPL by other libraries through interlibrary
loan. The library also served as an information center for workshop
happenings. Messages, schedules, and general information items were
passed along in the library in effort to make library patrons .aware
of the movies, lectures and performances happening in the town.
The library also served as a display centeri.for some of the art
40 projects. Fred Putz arranged a fantastic display of his puppets
and marionettes which have been collected from several different
countries. Later in the workshop there was a display of children's
8
prints and hand puppets that had been made during their workshop
classes. Needless to say both displays were very impressive and
were well received by the library patrons. During the fall and spring
semesters the library has cooperated with Colorado Mountain College
by serving as a "classroom" for some of the courses offered which
were scheduled to meet"in the library. Only one course was well
attended. That particularily successful course was taught by.Fred
Geis and the subject was the folk ballad. Fred would bring his
guitar and Panjo and delight his students with both songs and infor-
mation for an hour and a half on Thursday evenings. The reaction
by library patrons was mixed. There were a few patrons who felt
uneasy about a ballad class being held in the library since
libraries are supposed to be hollow halls of silence but they seemed
0 more at ease when I explained that it happened only one night a
week and that the library was silent all other nights that we were
open. Many of the patrons joined the class when they discovered it
was happening. Some nights the attendance would swell to approxi-
mately 25 from the addition of patrons who "just sat in." The other
classes never even got started, they were more library oriented
classes since they basically would have been discussion groups on
modern literature. The lack of response to these classes indicates
to me either a lack of time, a general anti-intellectual mood or
else general apathy on the part of the adult population. After
seeing the negative response to these courses I have not attempted
to organize any adult discussion groups.
Colorado Mountain College has reciprocated for the cooperation and
use of the VPL by giving the library a student on scholarship as
J
a library worker for 20 hours during the month of July. Dave
McMillan was the student assigned to the library. Having Dave was
great, I could rely on him being there at specific. times and could
plan work for him. Dave helped with the shelving, filing, and the
maning of the circulation desk. After Dave had worked in the library
to earn part of his scholarship he continued to work as a volunteer
until he left for art school. Consequently, CMC helped in the
library not only during July but also during August and part of
September.
The other projects involving the library centered around the children.
During the portion of the school year after the library opened the
school children came over once a week as a class to use the library.
The schedule allowed approximately 20 minutes per class for the
children to pick out books and listen to stories that I would
read to them. The children really liked the library time and were
very disappointed if they had to miss it. It did accomplish, with
some of the children, the purpose I had intended, regular use of the
library during the summer. Many of the students did attend the summer
reading program which was directed by John Newsom. John and the kids
had a great summer reading science fiction. Having been a 6th grade
teacher, John selected science fiction books which were suitable for
juveniles and then helped the children select the proper books for
their interest and reading level. The program met once a week on
Wednesday afternoons. The children would discuss with John the
books they had read and the ideas they did or didn't understand.
After everyone had their questions answered or at least discussed,
10
John would read either a few chapters out of the science fiction book
of his choice or a few short stories which would also be discussed.
The children seemed to enjoy the program but the attendance was a
little ragged. The children all went to camp at different times, went
out of town for a week with their parents, etc., etc.; regular
attendance during the summer seems to be impossible.
There was another summer project which centered around the children.
It was the combining of library collections from Vail Elementary
School with the children's collection at VPL. The transfer was
fairly smooth and successful. The books did receive a lot of use
and the school library volunteers did help out with the tedious
job of marking the school books so that they could easily be
separated from the library books at the end of the summer. It did
take until after Thanksgiving to finally return all the books loaned
to VPL by the school. The delay was primarily caused by delinquent
patrons who did not return their books on time. The project on the
whole did take too much of my time but I did have Dave to help inte-
grate the two collections on the shelves which occupied nearly 20
hours of his time. Luckily the school volunteers pulled the school
collection off the shelves at the end of the summer so I did not have
to spend any'tim.e._;on that aspect. I am walling to combine the two
collections in the summer as long as the majority of the work is
is done by school volunteers. There are too many other projects that
will advance the development of VPL that I need to have my volunteers
work on and this particular project will not benefit VPL in future
years.
11
There was one other project which involved using some of the students
from Vail Country Day School as workers in the library. It was not
overly successful. There were three children assigned to the li-
brary for vocation training. The idea was great, I was eager to have
the library participate, but I was forced to change my mind after the
children had been working for about one month. I was very pleased
with the work produced by the young man but the two young ladies
were a fatal combination. The two girls were a bad influence on each
other and all attempts to separate them from each other proved futile.
Giggling and general noise was the larger portion of their contri-
bution to the library. I received complaints about their noisy
presence from the library patrons so I had to call the headmaster
and ask him to separate the girls. Instead, he pulled all three
children out of the library because the project was nearly completed
when I called him. I think it is a good project. VPL unfortunately
experienced a combination of giggley girls. If the project is run
again next year I feel we should participate and hopefully the
children will experience some of the aspects of working in the library.
In the first nine months of operation the library has been quite a
busy place. It is used by members of each facet of our community.
It offers services to the community that were previously unavailable
and many patrons express their gratitude with comments like, "It's
0 really nice to have a library."
Annette Milliron
Librarian
Vail Public Library
APPENDIX
0
•
•
Circulation 'Figures
November 1 December. 31
Regular Circulation 9,816 11052
Paperback Circulation 55000 6,000
Books in the Library 91,000 10,000
Library Card Holders 685 795
Average Books Per Week
Circulated 316 425
Average Books Per Day
Circulated 63 73
1
V 6+x-C- ' .
MONTHL'Y' REPORT FOR MONTH-0F
LI 3RARY ,/ 4c, aAiv Box Zip P 6 5 7 Phone
CIRCULATION
Books Adult fiction (include YP) gag
A.dclt non-fiction 'r t+ ,
Pjnl-- ? fic ion(I clude msy) $
junior non-fiction
I. T.INCATi'LLCvED paperbacks
04113 Newspapers
Audic- Flimp
viijLal Filmstrips
Other Maps
non-bo,-k Pictur613
material. Racordings
Other material
TOTAL `f
Nvanber of photocopies supplied at Library's oxPonse
in Llom of circulation .. ........ ........
Nuinber of Reference questions answered........... l C?
IITERL:2-RARY LOANS
Mat: rials borrowed cn
interlibrary loan
WOOK3 / -3
F ERIODM A'..S
I{ LLMIS, FIL'_`ZTF IM
RECORDIlgCS
O'.i HER NON-BOOK
MATERIALS
Number of interlibrary loan requests forwarded:
To Systems resource library............
To ether libraries ....................
REPORT: (Extra activities, changes in hours, special programs, etc.)
Mater:a; o lt;?at on latv,,rpihrazy
Loan
r
Sigw?d
2
Library Fund
40 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures - Estimated and Actual
For the Year Ended December 31, 1972
REVENUE:
General property taxes,
net
Specific ownership taxes
Charges for services
and fines
Town of Vail General
Transfer Fund
Contributions
TOTAL REVENUE
•
Personal services
Non-Personal services
Capital outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES:
Estimated
(as amended)
$11,500
500
750
$12,750
$ 8,115
750
3,885
$12,750
3
Actual
$12,229
599
136
1,411
291
$14,666
$ 7,377
2 , 647
4,442
$14,666
Estimated
Over (Under)
Actual
$729
99
(614)
1,411
291
$1,916
(738)
2,097
557
$1,916
The following is a tog of catalog cards sent to New Castle
to build the Western Slope Union Catalog. For each card
we receive a fifty cent subsidy.
August 1972 121
September 1972 62
November 1972 99
December 1972 220
•
•
4
0 %
,? W p N can r+o c+ ??',', `" r•
(A ct
tA C-- P.
cl-
CA. 0
• ijQ
ON N1
M
M (Da
p
N a N "? N • *?
? v
' Ct
Cell
w ?n
ct,
N Ct' SA Ifl'
O N
M co td ?' P
S-'. W W p N W M +i t CIO
?p ?fc P. W ON j a EiJ 1? ' C, ?. Q
N N pt' W M
? ? d
O Q Nj N • Nj Cy Ct
V1 O T • tv, tuft c? t7 [A
01
Q 45 W ?O G7 ?. ,a
t?J t? O N ?d °
V '
• ?yrs S + r Y}
rl>
__a \0 %JO kii
\A Ce
ta' ? C 4 ? , % ? cA
•d
•
i1
MINUTES
SPECIA L MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
JULY 12 , 1973
0 A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., July 12, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
The meeting had been called and advertised in order to present the proposed
Town of Vail Master Plan. Prior to conducting any business, it was announced
that the Council would meet for a work session at 10:00 a.m. on July 13. A
statement was read by the Mayor setting forth the need for such a plan. He
noted that the firms involved are Livingston & Blaney and Royston, Hanamoto,
Beck & Abey. Mr. Ream has been hired as the architect for the transportation
center. Mr. Minger commented on the parking inventory analysis. The
figures of needed parking were arrived at by three separate studies; by
Beardsley-Davis, Royston et at, and the Town Staff. The proposed parking
structure had been reduced from 1500 to 1000 cars as these studies indicated
that there was some danger of over--building the structure. However, expan-
sion to 1500 cars in the future is possible. Until that time, the eastern portion
of the land could be used for a park or recreational facilities.
Mr. Beck noted some of the tasks they had been given: 1. develop a policy
for growth; 2. develop a long-range open space, green belt and park program;
3. develop a recreation system plan; 4. study transportation and parking
problems; 5. consider an environmental study of the valley. Mr. Beck
explained three maps: the landscaping development plan, the transportation
analysis and the development phasing process. Mr. Ream explained his plans
for the parking structure and transportation terminal. The cost of the proposals
was given by Mr. Bernstein. The transportation terminal and 1000 space parking
lot would cost approximately 4.3 million dollars; the landscaping and mall areas,
etc. associated with this would be $600,000. The annual debt service on the
project would be $440,000, with $203,000 a year coming from revenues and
$237,000 from sales tax. In regard to the rate structure, there would be a ski
season rate and summer rate, the main difference being that, in the latter case,
the first three hours would be free. There would also be two season passes;
one for the ski season and one for the entire year. It was emphasized that the
rates have not yet been finalized, but have been developed in order to make
approximate calculations. Mr. Minger noted that the workability of the rate
structure was dependent on a good, free, mass transit system.
Mr. Dan Herrington explained the mechanics of a bond issue. For Vail, he
recommended a general obligation bond supported by revenues from the project
and sales tax revenues. An 8 million dollars bond issue would require a 1 cent
increase in sales tax. Three questions will appear on the ballot; the one cent
sales tax increase; the issuance of a bond for the purchase of the Antholz property;
and the issuance of a bond for 4.9 million for the parking structure/transportation
terminal. Mr. Herrington noted that the people eligible to vote were those over
18 who are registered and residents of Vail.
A short break was taken at 9:30 P.m. and the meeting resumed with questions
from the and lence at 9:50 p. m.
Mayor Dobson noted that Mr. Ream has been giving some attention to the pos-
sible use of some of the area under the berm for a meeting room. However, it
was his opinion that the idea needs further study.. Mr. Hyder noted that if
construction was begun on October 119 1973, the parking could be available
by November 15, 1974. Some of the work on the transportation terminal
portions would not be completed until 1975.
Mr. Nott noted that in the plan for the Antholz property, he saw no provision
for a community school. In his opinion, this would be a better location than
the Vail Associates land in Sandstone. Mayor Dobson agreed that such a
facility should be considered. Mr. Whitelaw inquired what percentage of the
total sales tax is paid by the tourist. Mr. Bernstein responded that he thinks
the figure is probably 80%. He also noted that. Aspen has a 71/c sales tax. In
regard to the ownership of the land for the parking structure, Mayor Dobson
noted that Vail Associates is willing to deed the land to the Town in fee simple.
A member of the audience inquired if additional revenues could be gained by
annexing outlying areas; Mr. Minger indicated that for the first five years, a
deficit would be incurred by the Town in regard to residential arses annexed.
In response to a question regarding the cost of a transit system, Mr. Minger
noted that for next year, Vail Associates and the Town will sponsor a 6-bus
system; however, a regional transit authority would be the answer to funding
service outside of the municipal limits. Mr. Bernstein noted that the funds
for the municipal bus service come from the genera! fund revenues. He also
noted that 40 riders per hour would be needed to support a regional system on
the schedule he had used in his calculations.
A member of the audience inquired about alternative methods of financing. Mr.
Herrington responded that the impact of an 8 million dollar bond issue supported
were built on the Antholz, the change of grades on the present lot would be lost
and a great deal of excavation required. In response to a question, Mr. Beck
noted that the proposed bus routes are two-way. Mayor Dobson noted that the
use of the berm area by the VRA would require the addition of another skylight.
However, this plan would not be finalized until more specific proposals were
received from the VRA.
by property tax would be 40 mills. In addition, at this point in time, bond
counsel would not approve a bond issue supported by a bed tax. Mr. Bernstein
added that if a person spends $3,00 a year in Vail, the amount of tax paid as
a result of the additional cent tax would be $30.00. Mr. Westby asked for a
cost comparison of putting parking on the ,?ntholz as opposed to building the
proposed structure. Mayor Dobson suggested that it would be more expensive
on the Anfiholz as the land cost would be great while the current site is free.
In addition, he did not view parking lots as the best use for the Antholz. Mr.
Westby suggested that 40-50 car lots, well landscaped, would be acceptable and
avoid a structure. Mr. Minger^ suggested that to attempt to park one thousand
cars on the Antholz would cover half the property. A member of the audience
suggested that a structure be built in Lionshead. Mayor Dobson noted that that
might be necessary in the future; but, it would not solve the problem in the core
area. Mr. Minger added that the intent is to keep the old core and the Lionshead
core balanced and viable. Returning to the question of use of the Antholz for
parking, Mr. Beck added that the location would add a burden on the transit
system and eliminate walking to and from the cars. In addition, if a structure
A member of the audience inquired if there were any other major projects to be
accomplished within the next two or three years. Mr. Herrington noted that
there were all of the master plan proposals suggested for later phases; however,
8 million dollars would not saturate the capacity of the Town; the limit is probably
10 million dollars. If sales tax revenues were to increase, more flexibility would
be gained. Mr. Westby inquired if there were any federal funds available for
landscaping along the highway. Mr. Minger indicated that no funds will be avail-
able until 1975 but that the Town is making application. In addition, it is hoped
to obtain five thousand trees from the Vail .:Pass right-of-way over the next two
and a half years. Mr. Hofler inquired about a possible chair lift on the Antholz
property. Mayor Dob'san indicated that no decision has 'been reached in this
regard. In response to a question, he noted that the proposed bridge for the
Manor Vail Road would be a pedestrian bridge.
-2-
Mr. McLaughlin inquired about the operation of the snow melting equipment
on the proposed parking structure. Mr. Ream noted that a purification filter-
ing system will operate in such a fashion that the water can be returned to
the stream at 1 ° higher in temperature than the water in the stream. Mr.
Minger stated that, in regard to the effect of an efficient transportation system
on vehicular traffic, it is hoped that the number of local automobiles can be
reduced by 50%. Mr. McLaughlin inquired how many locals are using the main
lot at the present time. Mr. Bernstein noted that, on a design day last year,
1/2 of the cars in the main lot were YM plates or tocal; 150 out of 180 in the
ski school lot were local. A member of the audience inquired what the proce-
dure would be if people wanted to park their car in the structure for a week;
Mayor Dobson indicated that they would be charged'. Mr. Hofler inquired why
an "inclined wagon" had been incorporated in the structure. Mayor Dobson
suggested that it fits the configuration of the berm area. Mr. Ream added that
it is more expensive than an elevator and Less expensive than an escalator,
especially when it is considered that 3 separate escalators would have to be
used. An elevator would deposit the passenger 70 feet from the street. The
"inclined wagon" would connect levels 2, 3, and 4; Level 1 is only three feet
below grade. In addition, stairs have been included.
The importance to the project of the land where the Cornice Building is located
was asked. Mr. Ream noted that it is important to the east end road and Mayor
Dobson added that a fair price for it wilt be determined. Mr. Klug inquired
about the effect on traffic patterns. Mr. Minger suggested that the intent is
not to generate more traffic in the core but to accommodate the cars which are
already there and are illegally or illogically parked. He did suggest that the
local might change his traffic pattern somewhat. Mr. Rodgers inquired if it
were possible to build additional tennis courts prior to Phase III. Mayor
Dobson suggested that the Recreation District might undertake such a project,
especially if the land were available to them. In addition, the land at the
eastern end of the parking lot might allow 3 or 4 courts. In response to a
question, Mr. Ream indicated that the tandscap;i'ng would be carried around
the east end of the structure. A member of the audience asked how important
the Antholz property is to the parking structure. Mayor Dobson stated that
they basically accomplish two different goals; that one does not follow from
the other. Mr. Kruse inquired how supplies would be received if the core
was closed. This closure would not be affected at the present time. Over a
longer period of time, a system for the delivery of supplies might evolve.
Mr. Beck indicated that a better regulation of the time of delivery might
adequately solve the congestion problem. If not, an electric cart system
is a remote possibility.
A member of the audience inquired what would happen if there were any unforeseen
construction delays. Mr. Hyder indicated that if the construction were not complete
they would stilt have 450 spaces. While under .construction, there will be some
problems, but Mayor Dobson indicated that the bus system would be relied upon
heavily to bring people from outlying parking areas. In addition, Mr. Minger
indicated that portions of the streets could be opened to parking for that sum-
mer only. Mr. Rodgers suggested that if the electric cart system were develop-
ed, it might require major changes in the parking structure. The Mayor indicated
that such a system would perhaps be centered in the undeveloped eastern end of
the lot. It was clarified that there would riot be parking provided for overnight
campers; these would continue to park in the outlying lots at Lionshead.
Mayor Dobson asked the Council for their comments. Councilman Staufer
emphasized that the parking structure would not look like a big city parking
lot, although this would cost a little more. In regard to the Antholz property,
he emphasized that the acquisition of land upon which facilities can be built
in the future is a top priority. He felt that the master plan should include
children's play areas in Sandstone. Mayor Dobson noted that a playground has
been discussed. Councilmen Bailey and Steinberg emphasized that they were
pleased and asked for citizen input. Councilman Donovan clarified that one
reason an ice rink has been more discussed than other amenities is that it can
serve many functions. A lso, an ice rink and performing arts center might, be
able to pay for themselves. He noted that there appears to be some confusion
over the condemnation process and that "condemnation" is not favorably viewed.
-3-
r
However, if the owners settled on an acceptable price, it could be purchased
immediately. The Council could not spend extra money just to avoid the
process. Councilman White emphasized that the parking structure is not
intended to bring in extra cars but to centralize those already present in the
core. Councilman Langmaid stated that he felt the plan would improve the.
Town.
Mr. Klug inquired if any land in the Lionshead area could be used for tennis
courts. Mayor Dobson replied that they are continuing to study that and there
possibly should be some courts located there. As a final note, he emphasized
that further meetings will be held and publicized.
The meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Town C lerf V
?J
E
0 -4-
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
JULY 16, 1973
A work session of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
1:15 p.m., July 16, 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A . Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
A [so present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Doug McLaughlin Gerald Dooher
Mr. McLaughlin explained that his group thinks that Town priorities should
be to get a portion of the Sunburst property and lessen the expenditure on
the parking structure. He supports the Town on the acquisition of the Antholz
property. He anticipated that the Town should spend 3.5 to 4 million on the
Sunburst property if their suggestion were followed. Mayor Dobson asked
what Town problems they felt this acquisition would salve. Mr. McLaughlin
replied that it would preserve and enhance the golf course and that amenities
could be built upon it, although he would prefer to see it left in its natural
state. He felt that a majority of the citizenry would support an effort to
acquire part of the Sunburst property.
Mayor Dobson noted, in regard to the parking structure, that a simple building
was rejected by the Town a year ago; the opinion was that something more
aesthetically pleasing was needed. Mr. McLaughlin suggested that the price
was high, even for an aesthetically-pleasing product. There was some
discussion of the pros and cons of ground-level parking on the Antholz' property.
Mayor Dobson noted that their proposal would require the sacrifice of either
the Antholz property or the parking structure. Mr. McLaughlin did not agree
with this. In further discussion, Councilman Donovan suggested that a move
to condemn the Sunburst property would perhaps raise the price of the Antholz
property. Mr. Minger suggested that even if all three projects could be.
pursued, there would be no money left to build any amenities. The Mayor
added that the additional amenities are needed to make Vail a viable place.
In further discussion, it was noted that the proposed inclinators for the
parking structure are not a source of great expense. Mr. Minger expressed
the opinion that a more basic parking structure would not save enough money
to finance other projects. Councilman Donovan suggested that other undeveloped
properties would have effects on the golf course and that, if the precedent were
set, it might be asked, logically, that they also be condemned. Mr. McLaughlin
disagreed; he thought these would be a different matter.
Mayor Dobson asked if Mr. McLaughlin's basic complaint was the cost of the.
parking structure; Mr. McLaughlin replied that it is not one thing, but rather
the cost as it relates to the other two projects he feels are priority items.
Mr. Dooher added that he thought preventing Sunburst from being a third core
to the Town was sufficiently valuable to justify the reduction of the parking
structure. Mr. McLaughlin stated that he would not have any serious objections
to the parking structure if the Sunburst property were National Forest Land.
Mr. Dooher asked if they could find out if the surety bonds had been posted by
the Sunburst group,,. Mr. Minger replied that the letters of credit have not yet
been posted. Mr. McLaughlin inquired if there was a contract binding the
group to abide by the new zoning ordinance; Mr. Minger replied that there is
such an arrangement. Mr. Robinson added that that was one of the conditions
of the approval of their P.U.D, permit.
Mr. McLaughlin asked in what way the Mayor thought their proposed initiative
could jeopardize the bond election. Mayor Dobson was concerned that the
issues might become so confused that an accurate reflection of voter opinions
would not be obtained in an election. Mr. Robinson suggested that if they
wanted to begin an initiative, they should change some portions of the proposed
ordi nance. Mr. Mc Laugh [in noted that this cou Id be easi ly done. He added
that they feel a need for haste, as condemnation will be more difficult the more
work is completed in the area. They would like to get a reading of what the
people want as soon as possible. Mayor Dobson suggested that this is a good
reason for taking a different approach to the matter. Mr. Robinson was of
the opinion that the proposed ordinance must be first presented to the Councit
before the petitions were circulated for antrlitiative. Mr. McLaughlin dis-
agreed; he thought the petitions should be circulated before the ordinance was
presented to the Council. After some further discussion of the proper procedure,
Mayor Dobson suggested that they agree that the ordinance be first submitted to
the Council. In regard to the specific ordinance, Mr. McLaughlin noted that he
would change it to allow for the purchase of portions of the property and require
negotiation for as many acres as could be purchasod., determined by the bonding
capacity. He repeated that he would like to see the land vacant. The Mayor
reiterated that such an approach would not solve the current problems.
Discussion returned to the question of how much money would be saved if the
parking structure were changed. Mr. McLaughlin volunteered to investigate
the question of the cost of a less ostentatious parking structure. Mr. Minger
agreed this would be a good idea. He suggested that a concrete frame would
- cost 3.3 million; Mr. McLaughlin stated that Mr. Lazier had quoted hire a
figure of 1 .6 million. In reply to the argument that a cheaper structure was
previously rejected, Mr. McLaughlin thought that might not hold true now if
the proposition was to build a cheaper one and also acquire part of the Pu lis
property. In regard to the additional amenities needed, Mr. McLaughlin
suggested that the Recreation District could build these. There was disagree-
ment that this District could do such construction projects.
Councilman Steinberg noted that as the proposal being made might cause the
loss of the Antholz property, perhaps they could wait until after this election
to circulate their initiative petitions. I f. this were done, their proposition
could appear on the November' ballot. He disagreed that the Pulis property
is increasing in value very rapidly. Mr. McLaughlin objected to this proposi-
tion as it does not reflect the relationship he sees between the parking structure
and the Pulis property acquisition proposal. Councilman Steinberg suggested
that another approach .would be to buy parcels of land throughout the Town with
other monies, rather than purchasing a second large parcel.
Mayor Dobson suggested that whatever action is taken by Mr. McLaughlin's
group, an attempt should be made to keep it from taking an irrevocable form.
The Mayor preferred that the group submit a proposed ordinance to the Council
and that hearings be held on it before they began to circulate petitions. Mr.
McLaughlin suggested that this would hold their group back in their efforts.
The Mayor suggested that the decision in these meetings would be based on
the audience input. Mr. Dooher objected that many people do not like to speak
in meetings. The Mayor noted that they are willing to seek public opinion
through other means. Councilman Donovan suggested that an article be prepared
for the paper with a return questionnaire at the bottom. Mr. McLaughlin
stated that he would take the proposal for putting the proposition before a
public forum back to his group. Mr. Dooher disagreed with the Town meetings
portion of the proposal. The Mayor summarized that it was his understanding
that, until the group presenting the proposal has had a chance to react, nothing
further will be done. Mr. McLaughlin agreed and further noted that he will
remain in contact with Mr. Robinson.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:00 p.m.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCI L OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
J U LY 17 .4 1973
The Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, met in regular session at
• the Municipal Building in said Town on Tuesday, the 17th day of July, 1973,
at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m.
Upon roll call, Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Thomas Steinberg Albert White
A [so present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
The meeting was first convened with the Town Council acting as the Local
Liquor Licensing Authority. An application had been received from The
Place at Vail for an expansion of the premises. Mr. McLaughlin submitted
a lease to the area which is currently owned by Mr. Lazier and Vail 21. -
_ He noted that eventually the area will be sold to Vail 21. Councilman Donovan
suggested that the expansion would double the size of the premises, yet no
additional parking was being required. Mr. Minger noted that patios are not
included in the parking requirements. Councilman Donovan suggested that
this exclusion should be discussed. Councilman White moved that the expansion
at The Place at Vail be approved; Councilman Steinberg seconded; approval
was unanimous.
As the second item on the agenda of the Local Liquor Licensing Authority had
been cancelled, Councilman Donovan moved that the Authority adjourn at
7:45 p.m.; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
The Town Council was convened at 7:45 p.m. In regard to the second reading
of Ordinance No. 8, the new zoning ordinance, Mr. Minger, reported that various
people feel that further explanation of certain portions is needed. Mr. Otto
clarified that his concern is that there are no standards. by which a project can
be rejected on the basis of its environmental impact report. Mr. Minger also
noted that Ms. Toughitt had submitted a list of proposed changes. Mr. Robinson
asked Ms. Toughill if any practical difficulties would arise if the Final passage
of the ordinance were delayed. She responded that there were several projects
involving a change of use, conditional use-permit, etc. that would be delayed;
however, no major projects would be affected. In further discussion, Council-
man Staufer suggested that the ordinance required too mu''. h parking. Council-
man Donovan suggested that provisions. could be added'which eliminated credits
for land which is unbuildable. Mayor Dobson noted that a letter had been
received from a committee of local architects expressing their approval of the
ordinance. Councilman White moved that the second reading of Ord inance No.
8, the proposed new zoning ordinance, be continued until the next regular
Council meeting, Councilman Donovan seconded the motion, approval was.
unanimous.
Ordinance No. 9 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPRE-
HENSIVE SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND PROVIDING
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SAME; REGULATING
THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, RESTORATION,. ALTERATION, LOCATION,
LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS, WINDOW SIGNS, FLAGS,
PENNANTS, BANNERS AND BUNTINGS, DISPLAY BOXES, RESIDENTIAL
NAME PLATE SIGNS, SUBDIVISION ENTRANCE SIGNS, TEMPORARY-SITE
DEVELOPMENT SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY,
MURALS AND SUPERGRAPHICS AND PERMITTING AN APPROVED SIGN
PROGRAM; ESTABLISHING A DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE.AND GUIDELINES;
PROVIDING FOR VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE, REVIEW AND APPEAL
PROCEDURES; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 15 (Series of 1969);
AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO
was introduced for first reading by Councilman Donovan. The title was read
in full and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance were available.
Councilman Donovan stated that he did not like the fighting of the Bank of Vail
sign, which is permissible under this ordinance. He found this Lighting very
close to neon. Mr. Lamont noted that, in regard to the size of the sign, there
• is a question as to whether the Bank followed the original plan as approved by
the Sign Review Board. Under the new ordinance, the sign would not be allowed
to be as large. Mr. Bob Parker inquired if the wording, "plastic is discouraged,"
could be made stronger. Mr. Robinson \Aa s of the opinion that the wording
carried out the intent of the ordinance committee. Mr. B. Parker suggested
that approval from the committee for special events banners was too cumber-
some and that such items should be handled administratively. Mayor Dobson
agreed that this was a good suggestion. Mr. B. Parker noted that the language
in regard to non-conforming signs did not eliminate those signs. Mr. Lamont
stated that the original draft contained a provision for the gradual removal of
these signs; however, a Denver court struck down a-similar provision unless
just compensation were paid to the owners'. The ordinance committee did not
feel that the Town Council should be requested to purchase signs. There was
some discussion of whether just compensation would be the cost of the sign or
a figure based on the business it is assumed to generate. Councilman Staufer
was opposed to including such a provision in the ordinance as he felt it would
encourage people to fight it rather than compromise. Mr. Lamont added that
he has been discussing the proposed re-design, to possibly include sign changes,
of the entry to Vail with the owners oP the gasoline stations and the Holiday Inn.
It was suggested that negotiations continue in this regard. Those who disagreed
with this position suggested that it would be necessary to have a legal provision
to back up the negotiations, even if the provision gave only the option to the
Council for purchase of the sign. Mayor Dobson referred the matter back to
the staff for changes prior to second reading.
Mr. Lou Parker suggested that the distinction between interior and exterior
signs was not clear enough. Mr. Lamont noted that the ordinance does not
concern itself with interior signs except in cases of an interior closed mall
or arcade. Mr. Parker noted that the ordinance does not specify the meeting
times of the design review board; he was of the opinion that a meeting should
be required within 30 days. Mr. Lamont agreed this could be done. Mr.
L. Parker was of the opinion that the distinctions in size of sign based on size
of shop would not stand up in court. That such provisions are included in
sign ordinances from throughout the country was noted by Mr. Lamont. Mr.
David Cole supported the distinctions in size; however, he felt that many
below-grade businesses have measurable frontage and should not be limited
to a very small sign. In addition, he suggested that if this distinction were
s maintained, perhaps variances should be given for larger signs that are
aesthetically pleasing. Returning to the question of the legality of the distinc-
tions, Mr. Lamont noted that similar provisions in the Denver sign code had
not been questioned when it was in court. Mr. L. Parker stated that he found
it offensive that residential signs should be reviewed by the Design Review
Board. Mr. Lamont justified this provision on the grounds that the location
of residential signs can cause traffic and snow removal problems. Several
members of the audience spoke in favor of a review of the requirements for
befow.?grade business signs. Mr. Parker suggested that it was necessary to
provide procedures for an applicant to personally appear before the Council;
Mr. Lamont noted that this could be incorporated.
Councilman Staufer had previously moved that Ordinance No. 9 be approved;
Councilman Donovan now seconded the motion; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Lang maid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were
no votes against; the motion carried. Councilman Steinberg moved that a
public hearing be scheduled on the second reading on August 21; Councilman
Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg,
White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion
carried and the To%&n Clerk was instructed to publish the ordi nance for public
hearing.
-2-
Ordinance No. 10 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SPECIAL
ELECTIONS WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL, DESIGNATING THE TIME FOR
SUCH SPECIAL ELECTIONS, MODIFYING AND AMENDING PROVISIONS
OF THE COLORADO MUNICIPAL ELECTION CODE AS SUCH APPLY TO
SPECIAL ELECTIONS WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL AND SETTING FORTH
MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced for First
40 reading by Councilman Staufer. The title was read in full and the audience
advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson explained that the Home Rule
Charter provides that the Town should fol<low the Colorado Municipal Election
Code. This Code specifies that no special elections should be held within 90
days of a regular election. This provision would prevent the Town from
conducting the bond election on September 25. However, the Charter does
provide for amendments to this code; hence, the proposed ordinance would
amend the Code to allow special elections up to 30 days prior to a regular
election. The Council was polled as to whether they had read and understood
the ordinance; Councilmen White, Langmaid, Staufer, Bailey, Donovan, and
Steinberg each indicated that he had: Councilman Donovan moved that
Ordinance No. 10 be approved on first reading and that a public hearing on
second reading be held on August 7;. Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in
favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk was
instructed to publish the ordinance.
Ordinance No. 11 (Series of 1973) AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING REVENUE
AND IMPOSING A SALES TAX UPON THE SE LLING.OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL
PROPERTY AT RETAIL AND ON THE FURNISHING OF SERVICES IN THE
TOWN OF VAIL; INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF SALES TAX WITHIN THE
TOWN OF VAIL; CALLING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON SEPTEM-
BER 25, 1973, FOR SUBMISSION OF THE INCREASED SALES TAX TO THE
QUALIFIED REGISTERED VOTERS FOR APPROVAL.. OR REJECTION THERE-
OF; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced for first reading by Council-
man White. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised
that copies of the ordinance were available. Mr. Robinson clarified that the
sates tax would not be in effect until July 1, 1974. Councilman Donovan moved
that Ordinance No. 11 be approved on first reading; Councilman Steinberg
seconded the motion; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer,
Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against.
The Mayor thereupon declared the ordinance duly approved on first reading
and directed that the ordinance be published once in full in thp,Vail Trail,
a legal newspaper of general circulation within the Town of Vaii on July 20, 1973.
The Mayor advised the Council that petitions for annexation of real estate
commonly known as Vail Village 11th Filing, according to the recorded plat
is filed with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder, had been duly received by
the Town Clerk and that a public hearing had been scheduled for the regular
meeting of the Town Council. The Mayor also advised the Council that the
notice of the public hearing had been duly published in accordance with the
provisions of Colorado Revised Statutes (1963) 139-21-7.
The Mayor asked if anyone was present at the public meeting who wished to
make any comments or statements regarding the annexation of the territory.
Mr. Jen Wright suggested that the annexation of this area would be helpful to
a future Bighorn annexation. There were no people present to speak against
the petitions. Mr. Robinson clarified that the area is not yet in the districts; .
this will be done after it is brought into the Town. However, petitions have
been signed that indicate the owners' willingness to join these districts. Mr.
Wright noted that it is correct that the area is zoned "Residential." He also
mentioned that the paving in the area will be done next year. The Mayor asked
that this be put into writing; Mr. Wright stated that this would be done.
There were no other comments from the public. Upon a resolution made by
Councilman White and seconded by Councilman Steinberg the Town Council
voted unanimously to dispense with the reporting of the hearing and to
substitute in lieu thereof detailed minutes summarizing the proceedings.
-3-
,,,an2EI C. -?S-L€V n
Mayor John Dobson
and Town Council
Vail, Colorado.
Dear Mayor Dobson and Councilmen;
regret that I tender my resignation
and Zoning Commission.
July 6th, ]973
It is with sincere
from the Planning
My sole reason for this decision is the fact that I am
not in a position to devote the necessary time required
to be an effective member of the Commission. I am resiging
now, so that my replacement may be able to begin work
before the new zonQng ordinance goes into effect.
I would like to thank you for giving me the opportunity
of working with the Council, the Commission and the Town
of Vail at such a challenging time in Vail's history.
Sin:erely u
l'
VU
Jazzes M. levin
jms ;dm.
c.c. Mr. Terry Minger
c.c. Planning and Zoning Commission
•
. r4 .
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Town Council was advised that
CRS (1963) 139-21-9 required that certain findings be made. Upon a motion
made by Councilman Donovan and seconded by Councilman Staufer the Council
voted unanimously to adopt a resolution setting forth the following findings
and conclusions:
1 . That the requirements of the applicable parts of the
Sections, CRS 139-21-3 and 139-21-4, had been met and
complied with.
2. That under the provisions of CRS (1963) 139-21-6 (2)
no election would be required.
3. That there would be no additional terms or conditions
imposed upon the annexation of the subject territory.
4. That an appropriate ordinance would be introduced at the
next ensuing regular, meeting of the Town Council pertaining
to the annexation of the subject territory.
Next on the agenda was a request from Vail Associates; Inc. For a conditional
use permit For a snow-making pumphouse. A representative of VA noted that
the pumphouse would be constructed in an "Agricultural" zone, Tract A, Vail
Village 6th Filing, and would be 30 feet by 50 Feet. The general vicinity is
the area at the bottom of the Lionshead ski traits. Mr. Weibel suggested
that the absentee owners should have an opportunity to voice their opinions
of the project as it will generate considerable noise. A notice had been taut
in the Vail Trail; however, Mr. Weibel maintained that the absentee owners
do not read the paper . Counci tnian Donovan stated that the noise comes from
the guns used in snow--making, if you want snow, you must have noise. The
VA representative estimated that the noise is 80% from the guns; Mr. Rose
estimated that this is 90%. In regard to alternative locations, it was noted
that water is the limiting factor. Ms. Toughill suggested that the pumphouse
was not essential to the installation of the system; hence, the decision is not
whether or not to have the system. Councilman White inquired if the proposed
building is below-grade. The representative of VA replied that it is not and is
twelve feet high. There was some discussion of what type of building would be
most attractive. It was requested that the building be landscaped. After some
further discussion, Mr. Peterson agreed that it was a good idea to bury the
building, if this was Feasible. The Mayor suggested that VA notify the adjoin-
ing property owners. Mr. Peterson noted that the equipment has been ordered
for this project. Although studies on the noise levels were suggested, Mayor
Dobson noted that these would not necessarily be relevant to the decision the
. Council must make as the only portion upon which they will decide is the
pumphouse. Councilman Donovan moved that the question of a conditional
use permit for Vail Associates be continued until the next regular meeting;
Councilman Staufer seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mr. James Slevin had submitted his resignation from the Planning Commission.
The Mayor, speaking for the Council, accepted it with regret. He noted that
there are now two vacancies on the Planning Commission. This Commission
has scheduled a meeting for 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday.
Councilman Steinberg moved that Sally Hanlon and Jack Curtin be appointed
to the Town of Vail Election Commission; Councilman Donovan seconded;
approval was unanimous. Two applications had been received for the vacancy
on the Board of Appeals and Examiners; Don Kline and Dudley Abbott. An
informal ballot was taken on the question of appointment.
In regard to the winter shuttle bus program, Mr. Minger was of the opinion that
two additional buses are required to provide a high level of service. He has
been looking at the mini-bus that is used in Denver. It could carry 25 seated
and 20 standing, is dieset powered, and the cost is $24,959. Vail Associates
has agreed to purchase one bus if the Town will purchase one bus. In regard
to the division of operating and maintenance costs, they are proposing that
the Town pay 750/c. Councilman Steinberg suggested that a further item of
-4-
r, - -
discussion should be experimentation either by VA or the Town or both with
service outside of the Town. In regard to Ginkelvans, Mr. Minger was of
the opinion that the Town should not further experiment with them at this
time, but perhaps would do so a year from now. He was of the opinion that the
emissions of a diesel engine could be reduced by 60% to 70%. School buses
have not been selected as they are not a Mowed by the P. U. C. to be used on
the highway and do not hold up well. Mr. Peterson clarified that Vail Associates
can only purchase one of the needed buses if their share of the expenses is
reduced to 25%. It was suggested that perhaps the Town could lease vehicles;
this is not possible with this type of vehicle. There was some discussion of
the different types of engines available. Mr. Minger noted that Aspen will
be experimenting with an electric bus. He also noted that the Town has
experimented with propane fuels and did not have good results. Discussion.
also centered on the size of bus needed; Mr. Peterson expressed his opinion
that the size tentatively chosen is the best for the purpose. There was some
discussion of whether the system is actually a horizontal lift; hence, VA should
share more of the expense. Mr. Bernstein noted that operating costs will
probably be $50,000 next year. Mr. Weibel suggested that if the Town were
to bear 75% of the cost, the buses should be run to a later hour in the evening.
There was general agreement among the Council that the type of vehicle being
considered was appropriate.
In regard to the sharing of operating costs, Mr. Minger thought the choices
were either that the Town buy one bus and VA buy none but pay 50% of the
costs, or that each buy one bus and the split be 75/25. He noted that the
agreement over the years has been that the system will gradually become a
municipal system. In either event, VA will house and maintain the buses.
Councilman Donovan suggested that there was another alternative which would
be for the Town to buy two buses and Vail Associates stilt pay 50% of the
operating costs. Mr. Peterson noted that that was acceptable to hire. After
some further discussion, Mr. Minger was authorized to continue negotiations
with Vail Associates on the three alternatives set forth at this meeting.
The minutes of the meetings of June 19 and July 3 had been previously submitted
to the Council. Councilman Bailey moved that they be approved; Councilman
Steinberg seconded; approval was unanimous.
The count of the ballots for the vacancy on the Board of Appea is and Examiners
indicated that Don Kline had been elected to the. position.
Mr. Bob Parker suggested the need for a more effective entrance sign to the
Town. The Mayor noted that this has been considered in connection with the
Master Plan but that the Town will work with the VRA on this.
Mr. Merv Lapin stated that he was witting to request a non-exclusive franchise
for the trash and to allow review of rates to the Town. Councilman L.angmaid
reiterated his opposition to any kind of a franchise. The other members of
the Council were generally in favor of exploring this approach. Councilman
Donovan moved that the staff be instructed to draw up this type of an agreement
for consideration; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous. Mr.
Weibel inquired if he would be paying a franchise fee.
Mr. Weibel inquired if the voucher sheets for each month are available.
Councilman Donovan noted that the Council receives them but has not been
formally approving them. Mr. Minger noted that members of the general
public can request a copy at any time.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the meeting adjourn
at 10:45 p.m.; Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk
-5-
. 1
t .
M
Board of Trustees
Town of Vail
- 2 -
July 31, 1973
I enjoyed the presentation of your planning firm the previous week. You
are to be congratulated that you are moving Vail forward in an orderly
manner.
Last ski season my niece had her skis stolen, but the thief was apprehended
immediately. The matter was investigated by your Police Department. On at
least twelve occasions I have expressed, either to the Police Chief or to
a member of the Police Department, my concern about the lack of progress on
this case. I have received excuses from the Police Chief on this matter,
but can not give credence to such excuses.. I can only reach the conclusion
that after six months of delay and inaction that the Police Chief is either
not willing or capable of coping with thieves.
Thank you for your attention to the above matters. I would appreciate
your comments and resulting action.
Sincerely yours,
J. Dudley Abbott
JDA;ob
J. Dudley Abbott
P.O. Box 398
Vail, Colorado 81657
r.
Volunteers for Town of Vail Election Commission.
Need Council approval.
Marylyn "Sally„ Hanlon
Voriaufer Building
Town of Vail
Jack Curtin
311 Bridge Street
Town of Vai l
r
u
anclstonP ?p
YEAR-ROUND MOUNTAIN CONDOMINIUM HOMES
1028 GUARANTY BANK BUILDING 817 - 17TH STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202 PHONE: 303-892-6626
L
u
July 31, 1973
Board of Trustees
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gentlemen:
The July 17, 1973 Town Meeting is the subject of this letter; plus
one additional item.
The new sign ordinance is a plus, and should be enacted. The people
who have put this together are to be congratulated. The attitude.
exemplified by a particular element that existing signs, i.e. "Holiday",
should be given particular treatment under the new ordinance is not
reasonable. The rationale advanced that it is unreasonable to require
changes in existing signs is unreasonable and unwarranted. I draw a
parallel with the fact that you have changed existing land use density
ratios causing extensive losses to land owners. I do not agree with
the rationale that "Holiday" brings in a lot of money to Vail and should
be allowed to stand. This is a very narrow and confining point of view.
There seems to be applications of double standards here, one for land
owners and forced reduced land use; and one for sign owners.
It is most unfortunate that the BANK OF VAIL sign should be allowed to
come under strong attack since your staff had approved the sign before
it was erected.
1
Vail Associates, Inc. in their application for erection of a snow making
equipment building should have been approved. Snow is the name of the
game, and snow making is a necessity at LionsHead. Previously, as a
property owner and resident of LionsHead, I have fully recognized the
necessity of the noise that accompanies snow making in order to have
snow,: on the lower slopes. I call your attention to the fact that VAI
now has a non-conforming use in the form of a Race House. This house
would be replaced by a much more attractive structure. The alternative
simply is either, no snow with resulting lack of skiers; or snow and
skiers which spells success of a vital part of our community. I was
very distressed that you stood mute on this problem (with one exception),
and allowed excessive nit-picking by pseudo "experts".
J. DUDLEY ABBOTT, PRESIDENT
WILLIAM T. AHLBORG, JR., VICE PRESIDENT
WILLIAM S. GRAEFE, SECRETARY-TREASURER
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
AUGUST 7, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:45 p.m., August 7, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Mayor Dobson noted that the meeting would not exactly follow the printed
agenda. First to be considered was the second reading of Ordinance No. 10,
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SPECIAL ELECTIONS WITHIN THE TOWN
OF VAIL, DESIGNATING THE TIME FOR SUCH SPECIAL ELECTIONS,
MODIFYING AND AMENDING PROVISIONS OF THE COLORADO MUNICIPAL
ELECTION CODE AS SUCH APPLY TO SPECIAL ELECTIONS WITHIN THE
TOWN OF VAIL AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELA-
TION THERETO. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience
advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson noted that no amendments
had been made to this ordinance. The Council was polled as to whether they
had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had. Council-
man Steinberg moved that Ordinance No. 10 be adopted; Councilman Bailey
seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg,
White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion
carried and the ordinance was adopted.
Ordinance No. 11, AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING REVENUE AND IMPOSING
A SALES TAX UPON THE SELLING OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY
AT RETAIL AND ON THE FURNISHING OF SERVICES IN THE TOWN OF
VAIL; INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF SALES TAX WITHIN THE TOWN OF
VAIL; CALLING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON SEPTEMBER 25,
• 1973, FOR SUBMISSION OF THE INCREASED SALES TAX TO THE QUALI-
FIED REGISTERED VOTERS FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION THEREOF;
PROVIDING FOR THE EARMARKING OF FIFTY PERCENT OF ALL OF THE
SALES TAX REVENUES; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; AND
SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced for
second reading. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience
advised that copies were available. Mayor Dobson reiterated that even with
the passage of the ordinance, the question of the sales tax increase must still
be approved by the voters. The Council was polled as to whether they had
read and understood; each indicated that he had. Councilman Donovan moved
that Ordinance No. 11 be adopted; Councilman White seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in
favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the ordinance was
adopted.
Ordinance No. 12, AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING TO THE TOWN OF VAI L
CERTAIN TERRITORY SITUATED IN EAGLE COUNTY, SIA TE OF.CO LORADO,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS VAIL VILLAGE 11th FILING,
ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF; ZONING SAID PROPERTY
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL;
AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO,
was introduced for first reading by Councilman Donovan. The title was read
in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies were available. Mr.
Robinson noted that a public hearing had been held at the last regular meeting
0.
?7_
•
and findings and conclusions set forth. The Mayor polled. the Council as to
whether they had read and understood the ordinance; CounciIn-e n White,
Langmaid, Steinberg, Donovan, Bailey and Staufer each indicated that he
had. Councilman Staufer moved that Ordinance No. 12 be approved on first
reading and published for public hearing at the next regular meeting; Council-
man Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer,
Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor, there were no votes against; the
motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to publish the ordinance.
Mr. Robinson explained that Resolution No. 30 sets forth the questions to be
voted upon in the election; appoints the judges and clerks for that election;
sets forth the qualifications for voting and like matters. This document will
be on file for public inspection. Councilman Steinberg moved that Resolution
No. 30 be adopted; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were
no votes against; the motion carried.
In introducing the master plan presentation, Mayor Dobson noted that many
of the suggestions and recommendations made at previous hearings had been
incorporated into the plan. Mr. Royston added to this that the plan is still
not a fixed article. Mr. Beck and Mr. Royston presented slides and explained
four maps; the master plan, transportation plan, open space plan and develop-
ment plan. Mr. Ream presented the plans for the transportation terminal and
parking structure. He noted that a basic, open parking structure costs $2,000
per car space. In the present proposed design, there are several advantages.
1 . the cars are hidden; 2. a major entryway to the town is provided; 3. a
major landscaped area is provided; 4. visitor services are. tnctuded; 5.
office space can provide additional income; 6. traffic is removed from East
Meadow Drive; 7. an additional roadway link is included; 8. snow removal
costs are reduced, 9. information distribution is given a focal paint; and
10. it saves land for future use. The cost projection for this is $3,860 per
car space.
Mr. Bernstein explained some calculations he had. made. The total master
plan, if it could be done tomorrow, would cost between 12.5 million and
14.5 million dollars. Mr. Amato asked Mr. Herrington what he foresaw
the interest rate to be on the bonds; Mr. Herrington replied that, in view
of the current situation, it might be 6.5/0; this would increase the debt service
calculated by $25,000 per year. Again in response to a question from Mr.
Amato, Mr. Herrington noted that the maximum interest will be set at 10%.
This allows certain coupons to bear higher interest than others. The current
bonded indebtedness is $2.5 million. If the Antholz property is given a value
of greater than 3 million dollars, Mr. Herrington indicated that some dif-
ficulties would be created for the Town. In response to the question as to
whether the Town could legally invest the funds from the bonds while awaiting
the expenditure of those funds, Mr. Herrington noted that the only restriction
is that the monies gained must be spent within 36 months. The bonds, if
authorized, will be issued by January 1. The. present tot parks 450 cars, the
new structure will park 1023 cars. Mr. Amato suggested that the cost of
each incremental space is therefore $7,000. Mr. Frank suggested that such
an approach is misleading; in many respects, the parking structure/transpor-
tation terminal is an attempt to start anew and incremental cost is not applicable.
A member of the audience inquired as to who had the control of the additional
funds that might be generated by the bond issue. Mr. Herrington noted that
any additional issuance of bonds would need to be voted upon; however, any
funds not requiring a bond issue are allocated by the Town Council. Mr.
Hyder presented a basic cost breakdown: parking structure - $3,950,000;
central plaza - $150,000; terminal building - $600,000; landscaping, paving,
road construction, property acquisition and fees - $490,000.
A member of the audience suggested that the parking structure did nothing to
enhance the environment of the Town. Mr. Royston offered the counter-
suggestion that the centralizing of cars frees much of the land of the Tov?n
-2--
.
for other purposes. The member of the audience, Mr. Link, suggested that
` it would be better to bus peopi6' into the Town Mr. Royston noted that even
if that were feasible, it would be necessary to have terminal facilities. Mr.
Frank inquired as to the public or private nature of some of the tennis courts
shown and also how long it would be before the performing arts center was
constructed. Mayor Dobson noted that public tennis facilities are needed;
those shown in the plan for Lionshead are subject to further negotiations.
Mr. Beck suggested that it would be possible, if the land acquisition were
made, to begin construction within three years on the performing arts center.
Mr. Frank suggested that, in this case; it would be preferable to convert the
A-frame to these uses. Mr. Beck stated that they have recommended that the
A-frame be kept in its present use. However, it is not large enough for a
performing arts center. Mr. Frank noted that a natural amphitheater exists
across the creek.
Mr. McLaughlin voiced several concerns. He is not convinced that a transpor-
tation terminal, beyond a parking structure, is needed. He suggested that the
cost of parking might drive people away from the old core. He further sug-
gested that the top level of cars will be visible from the frontage road. Mr.
McLaughlin objected to a free delivery service by electric carts. He sug-
gested that?the figure of $8,000,000 for the Antholz property was unrealistic.
It was Mr. McLaughlin's opinion that the plan is extremely core-oriented.
He suggested that Lionshead, Sunburst, Sandstone and areas outside of the
Town of Vail also needed attention. Mayor Dobson clarified that, in response
to a question from Mr. McLaughlin, the proposed restaurant operation. is
only seen as a service for those waiting for transportation or who arrive very
late on buses, etc. He also stated that if a delivery system were developed,
the question of who would bear its cost has not yet been determined. Mr.
Beck noted that any available areas in Lionshead and Sandstone have been
noted on the proposed plan; part of the difficulty is the unavailability of land
in those areas. Mr. Ream noted that the enclosing walls on the top Level of
the structure are four feet high and, hence, will hide a large portion of the
car. Also, plantings will extend above these walls. .
Mr. Elias expressed his concern that the 150,.000 people arriving in,VaiL by
bus last season were not being given the treatment they deserve. Mr. Minger
added to this that last winter 80,000 to 120,000 people a month were trans-
ported on the shuttle bus system. In addition, any regional system or valley-
interceptor system would need a terminal facility. It was Mr. Minger's opinion
that the Lionshead lot may need expansion at some time. Mr. Amato suggested
that any discussion of pedestrian walkways must take into account that the
streets may not be entirely owned by the Town. He maintains that they do.ncst
have the right to bar vehicles from these streets. Mr. Blumberg asked how
the questions will be presented to the voters. Mr. Herrington noted that there
i will be three questions; one on each project and one on the question of the
sales tax increase. Mr. Blumberg inquired what would happen if the purchase
of the Antholz were approved but the parking structure disapproved. Mr.
Herrington noted that that would depend on the opinion of the Council as to
whether the structure should be re-submitted to the voters at a later time.
Mr. Klug suggested that the Town should make an effort to purchase the land
on the south side of the creek"in Lionshead from Vail Associates. Mr. Beck
suggested that, as that is the only land available for open space in that area,
it might be preferable to continue to urge that courts being built there. be
changed to public courts.
Mr. Blair, the County Planner, asked for suggestions from the Town as to
the effect of their plan on surrounding areas and vice versa. Mr. Minger noted
that they have given some attention to an extension of the plan in terms of
bicycle paths, parks, etc. He added that, given the amount of growth projected
for the area, the Town is willing to help in any way possible. Mr. Blair sug-
gested that the Council draft a,statement setting forth their thoughts on growth
in the Upper Eagle Valley. Mr. McCall stated that he was in favor of a regional
planning authority covering the area from Wolcott. east. Mr. Blair noted that,
while he is not against such a body,'it might not be advisable to fragment
governmental efforts. The members of the Town Council expressed their
opinions in favor of the property acquisition and parking structure construction.
Councilman Donovan moved that the work of the planning firms to date on the
Master Plan be endorsed; Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mayor Dobson noted that discussion will continue on this plan.
The matter of a request for a conditional use permit for a snow-making. pump-
house from Vail Associates was next introduced. The area on which it.is to
be located is zoned "Agricultural." Mayor Dobson noted that he has received
four letters of concern over this project. Mr: Bob Parker was of the opinion
that the construction of a pumphouse would reduce clutter, reduce noise and
contribute economically to the community. He explained that the additional
snow on the lower Lionshead slopes would lengthen the season. The structure
would also be a racehouse. Mr. Welin added that the system has been approved
in concept by the Forest Service. A snow-making consultant stated that the
airless sytem is not at a stage such that its installation is feasible at this timq
however, the system currently designed can be converted in the future. In
either type of system, the pumphouse would be needed. Mr. Parker contributed
that the terrain around the building would be built up and that trees would be
planted. The details of color and roof material have not yet been decided.
Councilman White inquired what the alternative was to building the pumphouse
this season. Mr. Parker replied that they could put the equipment directly
on the slopes as before but that this is not efficient and they would not be able
to cover the higher areas needing snow. In addition, the old equipment takes
a longer time. In regard to the amount of water needed, Mr. Parker noted
that they would work with Mr. Rose on this matter. It was noted that approval
by the Planning Commission is also needed.
Mr. McLaughlin stated that he was representing three property owners in the
area. Vail Associates has agreed to sign a contract with them guaranteeing
that the building wilt be built as presented to them. Mr. Bill Jensen was
present representing Mr. George Cannon. They would like more clarification
of the project before entering into a contract with Vail Associates. They would
therefore ask that the request be tabled until this agreement can be reached.
Mr. Robinson noted, in response to a question, that any separate agreements
signed do not override the perogative of the Council in the matter. Mayor
Dobson suggested that the Council refer the matter to the Planning Commission
and await the completion of Vail Associates' negotiations over the contracts..
Mr. Ktug noted that the business people in Lionshead are concerned with the
improvement of skiing. Councilman White suggested that they build only a
temporary building this winter; Mr. Parlor responded that a temporary
building is not adequate for the new equipment. Mrs. Boyd asked if any time
limits would be applied to snow-making. Mr. Parker responded that the
scheduling depends on the temperature and humidity. In further discussion,
0 Mr. Parker noted that the vehicle noise would be approximately the same as
that associated with the operation last year. Councilman Bailey suggested
that more adequate drawings, and especially an elevation treatment, were
needed from Vail Associates. Mayor Dobson suggested that the matter be
referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendations. The matter
was tabled pending these findings.,
Ordinance No. 13, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
PATHS WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAI L; REGULATING THE USE OF SU CH
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHS; PROHIBITING TH E USE THEREOF BY
CERTAIN VEHICLES; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SUCH
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHS; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIO-
LATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced for first reading by
Councilman White. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience
advised that copies were. available. Mayor Dobson noted that the essence of
the ordinance is to prohibit all motorized vehicles from these paths. The
Council was polled as to whether they had read and understood the ordinance;
each indicated that he had. Councilman White moved that Ordinance No. 13
i be approved on first reading and that the Town Clerk be instructed to publish
same for public hearing at the next regular meeting; Councilman Steinberg
seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White
and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried.
-4-
014
r_?
Mr. McLaughlin, representing Mr. Larese in his request for a parking
variance, noted that a number of other buildings have been given variances
conditioned upon their agreement to purchase parking spaces when and if
they become available. Councilman Donovan expressed his opinion that it
would be a bad policy to allow the purchase of parking in order to undergo
a change of use. He suggested the matter be studied before a decision is
reached. Mr. Minger noted that, while Mr. Larese has a right to apply
for the variance, the Town has a Iready taken steps to purchase the prope rty.
Councilman Donovan moved that the matter be tabled until the rneeting of
August 21; Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous; the motion
carried.
Ordinance No. 8, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND PROVIDING
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SAME; CREATING
ZONING DISTRICTS; ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A ZONING MAP;
ESTABLISHING PARKING REQUIREMENTS; ESTABLISHING A DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD; CREATING REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORTS; PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT OF A ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR; PROVIDING FOR VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE, REVIEW
AND APPEAL PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE
NO. 7 (Series of 1969); ORDINANCE NO. 8 (Series of 1970, ORDINANCE
NO. 15 (Series of 1970), ORDI NAN CE NO. 3 (Series of 1972); AND SETTING
FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO was introduced
for second reading. The title was read in full and the audience advised
that copies were available.' Mr. Otto expressed the opinion that the revised
ordinance places a greater burden on the Town Council to show the reasoning
behind a denial of a project as a result of the environmental impact statement.
With this change, he felt that Vail AssociatesI concerns had been taken care
of and he recommended adoption of the ordinance. The Council was polled
as to whether they had read. and understood the ordinance; Bach indicated that
he had. Councilman Staufer moved that Ordinance No. 8 be adopted as
amended; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there.were
no votes against; the motion carried and the ordinance was adopted.
Mayor Dobson announced the appointment of Bill Hanlon to the Planning Com-
mission. The minutes of the meetings of July 12 and July 17 had been previously
submitted to the Council; Councilman Donovan moved they be approved; Council-
man Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mr. Otto noted that he had just been informed that if a decision on the snow-
making pumphouse was delayed another two weeks, they would be unable to
build it. Mayor Dobson noted they could have a special meeting if the agree-
m ents with the property owners were satisfactorily completed.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1;35 a. m.
Town Clerk
-5-
t
F
E
E
?J
FINANCING OF VAIL MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. FINANCING OF VAIL PARKING FACILITIES
A. Annual Debt Service Requirement - - - - - - - - - - 1
B. Annual Operating Budget - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2
C. Schedule of Annual Costs by Year - - - - - - - - - 3
D. Parking Facility Revenue Estimates- - - - - - - - - 4
E. Projected Annual Sales Tax Subsidy- - - - - - - - - 6
II. FINANCING OF VAIL LAND ACQUISITION
A. Annual Debt Service/Sales Tax Requirements-- - - - - 7
III. TOWN OF VAIL REVENUE ESTIMATES
A. Sales Tax Projections-General Fund;
Restricted Fund- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8
B. 21 Proposed Fund Yields Applied to
Parking Facility and Land Acquisition
Requirements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9
C. 11 (Existing) Restricted Fund Yields
Applied to Parking Facility and Land
Acquisition-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10
I. FINANCING OF VAIL- PARKING FACILITIES
A. ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
$4,900,000
VAIL PiW-KING FACILITIES
Interest Total Principal
Year Principal @ 6.007. and Interest
1974 $ 130,000 $ 294,000 $ 424,000
1975 1401000 286,200 426,200
1976 150,000 277,800 427,800
1977 160,000 268,800 428,800
1978 170,000 259,200 429,200
1979 175,000 x 249,000 424,000
1980 190000 23851500 428,500
1981 200,000 227,100 427,100
1982 210,000 215,100 425,100
1983 225,000 202,500 427,500
1981E 240.%000 189,000 429 , 000
1985 250,000 174,600 424,600
1986 270,000 159,600 429,600
1987 2851$000 143,400 428,400
1988 300000 126,300 426,300
1989 320,000 108,300 428,300
1990 335,000 89,100 424,100
1991 360,000 69,000 429,000
.1992 38G,000 47,400 427,400
1993 410,000 24,600 434,600
$4,900,000 $3,649,500 $8,549,500
•
I
I. Financing of Vail Parking Facilities (Continiued)
B. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
1. Peak Season (November 15 - April 15)
. Personal Services:
1-Supervisor (Annual. Salary) $12,000
1-Custodian./Security Ian (Annual
Salary) 10,000
5-Attendants/ Collectors
@$3,000/month 15000
Fringe Benefits 4,500
Total Personal Services $41;500
Non-Personal Services
Insurance (Yearly Premium) 6,000
Utilities (Ventilation/Fighting)
(Annual Allowance) 101000
Repairs/Mtnce./Equipment
(Annual Allowance) 5,000
Contingency - Annual Allowance 8,500
Total Non-Personal Services $29,500
•
Operating Budget - Peak Season $71,000
2. Low Season (April 16 - November 14)
Personal Services
3-Attendants/Collectors @$1,800
per month 12400
Fringe Benefits 21000
Operating Budget-Low Season $14,600
TOTAL ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET $85,600 *
IS* Snow Removal costs are same as they are with existing lot and
will be funded through General Fund.
-2-
I. Financing of Vail Parking Facilities (Continued)
C. ANNUAL COSTS (OPERATING AND DEBT SERVICE)
DEBT SERVICE OPERATING TOTAL
..AR (WAGE .1) (PAGE 2) COSTS
1974 $424,000 125,060 436,000
1975 426,200 85,600 511,800
1976 4271,800 88,600 5163-400
1977 428,800 91,600 520,400
1978 429,200 94,600 523,800
1979 424,000 97,600 5211,600
1980 428,500 100,600 529,100
1981 427,100 103,600 530,700
1982 425,100 1060600 531,700
0
83 427,500 109,600 537,100
1984 429,000 112,600 541,600
1985 424,600 115,600 540,200
1986 429,600 118,600 548,200
1987 428,400 121,600 550,000
1.988 426,300 124,600 5501900
1989 428,300 127,600 555,900
1990 424;100 130,600 554,700
1991 429,000 133,600 562,600
1992 427,400 136,600 564,000
0- 993 434,600 139,600 574,200
* Ili Months of Operation
-3-
I. Financing of Vail Parking Facilities (Continued)
D. PARKING FACILITY REVENUE ESTIMATES
1. Possible Rate Structure:
Peak Season (Nov. 15'- April 15)
lst hour = .25?
up to 3 hours= .50?
up to 6 hours= .75?
6-24 hours =$2.00
Low Season (April 16 - November 14)
up to 3 hours= Free
3 to 6 hours = .75?
6 to 24 hours=$2.00
Peak Season Parking Pass=$175.00
Annual Parking Pass =$250.00
2. A__ssumptions for 1974-1975 Ski Season
(lst year of operation):
-On 20 days there will be an average of 800
vehicles (excluding 100 season pass holders)
parked in the lot
-On 40 days there will be an average of 675
vehicles {excluding 100 season pass holders)
parked in the lot
-On 95 days there wil be an average of 450
vehicles parked in the lot
3. Revenue Potential for 1974-1975 Ski Season Based
on Above Rate Structure and Above Assumptions:
Peak Season:
20 days @ 800 spaces = 16,000 parking space days
40 days @ 675 spaces = 27,000 parking space days
95 days @ 450 spaces = 42,750 parking space days
155 days = 85,750 parking space days
x$2
Gross Revenues-Day $171,500
Parker (1974-1975)
•
-4-
4. Revenue Potential for 1975 Low Season Based on Above
Rate Structure:
Low Season:
210 days @ ave. 150 spaces=31,500 parking space days
x$2
Gross Revenues-Day Parker $63,000
1975 Low Season
5. Gross Revenue Potential and Estimate-1975
Peak Season $171,500
Low Season 63,000
Season Passes 20,000
Rent (Cont. Trailways' 33,000
V.R.A., Rest.) $287,500
•
L
_5_
I. Financing of Vail Parking Facilities
E. PROJECTED ANNUAL SALES TAX SUBSIDY:
DEBT SERVICE
(PACT, 1.)
$424,000
426,200
427,800
428,800
429,200
424,000
428,500
427,100
425,100
427,500
429,000
424,600
429,600
428,400
426,300
428,300
424,100
429,000
427,400
434,600
OPERATING
COSTS
(PAGE 2)
$12,000
85,600
88,600
91,600
94,600
97,600
100,600
103,600
106,600
109,600
112,600
11.5,600
118,600
121,600
124,600
127,600
130, 600
133, 600
136,600
].39,600
TOTAL PARKING LOT REQUIRED
COSTS REVENUE SALES TAX
$436,000 12,000 424,000
511,800 287,500 224,300
516,400 307,500 208,900
520,400 327,500 192,900
523,800 347,500 176,300
521,600 367,500 154,100
52.9,100 387,500 141,600
530,700 407,000 123,700
531,700 427,000 104,700
537,100 450,000 87,100
541,600 460,000 81,600
540,200 4701,000 70,200
548,200 480,000 68,200
550,000 490,000 60,000
550,900 500,000 50,900
555,900 510,000 45,900
554,700 520,000 34,700
562,600 530,000 32;600
564,000 540,000 24,000
574,200 550,000 24,200
ll' Months Operation
-6-
II:, FINANCING OF VAIL LAND ACQUISITION
A. ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REOUIRETIENTS (TO BE "?ET BY SALES TAX REVENUES)
$3,000,000
VAIL LAND ACQUISITION
•
•
?J
Year Principal
1974 $ 80,000
1975 85,000
1976 90,000
1977 100,000
1978 100,000
1979 110,000
1980 115,000
1981 125,000
1982 130,000
1983 135,000
1984 145,000
1985 155,000
1986 165,000
1987 175,000
1988 185,000
1989 195,000
1990 205,000
1991 220,000
1.992 230,000
1993 255,000
$3,000,000
Interest
@ 6.00%
$ 180,000
175,200
170,100
164,700
158,700
152,700
146,100
139,200
131,700
123,900
115,800
107,100
97,800
87,900
77,400
66,300
54,600
42,300
29,100
15,300
$2,235,900
-7-
Total Principal
and Interest
$ 260,000
260,200
260,100
264,700
258,700
262,700
261,100
264,200
261,700
258,900
260,800
262,100
262,800
262,900
262,400
261,300
259,600
262,300
259,100
270,300
$5,23.5,900
III.
Town. of Vail Revenue Estimiates
A. SALES TAX PROJECTIONS
3¢ SALES TAX EXISTING
41 S ALTS TAX PROPOSED
GENERAL FUND RESTR ICTED FUND
1. Administration 8. Summer Recreation 'I. Capi tal. Improvements
2. Police Dept. 9. Library } 2. Open Space Acquisition
3. Building Dept. 10. Special Events 3. Debt Retirement on Above
4. Streets & Roads 11. Debi: Service on City
5. Landscaping Hall
6. Health/Welfare 12. Municipal Bus System
7. Day Camp/Ice Skating
YEAR
1970 (Actual)
1971 (Actual)'
19 2 (Actual)
1 Estimated
1974 Estimated
1975 Estimated
1976 Estimated
1977 Estimated
1978 Estimated
1979 Estimated
1980 Estimated.
1981 Estimated
1982 Estimated
r?
?J
2K
YIELD
311,049
413,287
510,432
612,000
734)000
848,000
940,000
1,034,000
1,116,000
1,194,000
1,266,000
1,342,000
1,410,000
0 INCREASE
OVER
PRIOR YEAR
25.2
32.8
23.5
20.0
20.0
15.5
11.0
10.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
6.0
S.0
* Proposed Additional 1¢ Affective 7/1/74
1?
YIELD
255,000
306,000
367,000
424,000
470,000
517,000
5S8,000
597,000
633,000
671,000
705,000
2?
YIELD
534,000
84-8 , 000
940,000
1,034,000
1,116,000
1,194,000
1,266,000
1,342,000
1,410,000
-8-
I'II. T-own of frail Revenue Estimates (Continued)
B, 2? RESTRICTED FUND YIELDS APPLIED TO PARKING FACILITY AND
LAND ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS
2¢
SALES TAX
(PACE 8)
534,000
848,000
940,000
1,034,000
1,116,000
1,194,000
1,266,000
1,342,000
1,410,000
SUBSIDY REQUIRED LAND
PARKING FACILITY ACQUISITION
(PACE 6) (PAGE 7) .
424,000 260,000
224,300 2601200
2085900 260,100
192,900 264,700
176,300 258,700
154,100 262,700
141,600 26111.00
1232700 258,900
104,700 260,800
AVAILABLE
BALANCE
/(I.50, 000>*
363,500
471,000
576,400
681,000
777,200
863,300
959,400
1,044,500
* Available For:
1. Ice Skating Rinks
2. Recreation Centers (Pool., Gyms)
3. Performing Arts Center
4. Conference Center
5. Landscaping
6, Tot Lots
7. Tennis Courts
8. Reduction of Property Taxes
9. Reduction of Parking Lot Rates
10. Future Parking
11. Open Space Acquisition
to be funded Faith interest earned on bond proceeds from date of.bond
issue to final completion of parking facility
r7
_9_
w
C. 1? RESTRICTED FUND YIELDS APPLIED TO PARKING FACILITY AND
LAND ACQUISITION
1¢ SUBSIDY REQUIRED LAND
SALES TAX PARKING FACILITY ACQUISITION AVAILABLE
(PAGE 8) (PAGE, 6 ) (PACE 7 ) BALANCE?
367,000 424,000 260)000 <317,000>
4245000 224,300 260,200 <60,500?
470,000 208,900 260,100 1,000
517,000 192,900 264,700 59,400
558,000 176,300 258,700 1233,000
597,000 154,100 262,700 180,200
633,000 141,500 2612100 230,300
671,000 123,700 258,900 288,400
705,000 104,700 260,800 339,500
-10-
MEMORANDUM
•
August 6, 1973
TO: TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION
RE: CO M]WS ON VAIL MASTER PLAN
0
At a meeting Friday, August 3rd, the Planning Carmission reviewed in general
the Master Plan for Vail. Unf, Lanately, most of the Town, Staff was in Denver
so that scare of the CamLi.ssion's comments and questions might have already been
answered or reviewed.
In brief, the following points were raised.
I. PARYOM oim) lME -- East End
It appears that land has been left east of the structure for the structure to be
expanded onto. The reasons are undoubt-aly financial; however, the Ccmni.ssion
f-" s that as much of the structure should be 4,.,vleted at one time as possible.
Some reasons are:
1. Increasing costs in the caning years.
2. Adding later creates construction activity in the village.
3. Maximum structure now helps restrict imm?-9intely traffic
- into, and parking ir?-iairements for, the Golden Peak area.
Even if only 200 or 300 spaces are added, it should be done along with the main
building
II. AOCF.SS ROAD AND CURVE ALONGSIDE BLUE COW
A
Looking over the y??,ath of the Golden Peak area in terms of skiing alone, with
current and anticipated lifts, it seems that this access road will eventually
k ?..? a major yolume route for traffic. As shown it is certainly too nay ,#,
too steep, and presents too tight a turn onto the bridge over Gore Creek.
Possibilities to consider:
1. Widen the turn greatly at the bridge.
2. Flair the street to wide k-,.vk&..L Lions where it joins
the frontage road.
3. Heat the surface all the way to the frontage road.
4. Bring the road on a straighter line to the bridge fran
the frontage road, using part of the ground east of the
parking structure. This would not change the steepness,
but might increase safety factor of entering the bridge.
I
C TIS ON VAIL MASTER PLAN
Page Two
III. PASS TO CHRISTIANIA
Although automobile access is shown to parking lot across the. street fran the
Christiania, it is up quite a steep little hill and might prove quite difficult
to create in practice. Access to this area is important and one alternative
might be to open Hanson Ranch Road to limited traffic.
IV. THE COVP_x? BRIDGE
The Cammi.ssion considers this to be a problem for immediate and serious consideration.
The parking structure will create an enu?.?as volume of people coming through that
bridge; in fact, the congestion is significant now on crowded ski days. The exist-
ing bridge is simply not big enough to hanrllp those numbers of people comfortably.
To arrive in the village on foot by cardng down a magnificent stairway, along a
delightful landscaped walk, and then to stand in line to cross the bridge would
rather blunt the affect Vail is striving for. The Commission rec" auzuids for inclu-
sion in the pr??c.. for buiIA;ng the parking structure:
1. Enlarging the existing covered bridge.
2. Building a second one parallel to the first on
the west side.
A plan to solve the ice build-up problems that
occur on the bridge each winter.
V. L= ACCESS ROAD AND BRIDGE ON srm EAST END OF ANHOLZ
A only that the idea of the access is excellent but that the Commission
questions the location with -lard to terrain.
VI. 10 ACRE SITE SOUPf3EAS"i' OF MANOR VAIL
..The proposed new lift in the Golden Peak area will increase the uphill capacity
there to 2250 - greater than that presently served by Gondola I and Chairlift I.
This coupled with the poten+-ial devAI-?rment of the 10 acres owned by Vail Assoc-
iates could create massive traffic problems for that area, It will be i1,?b"_LLant
to know.as soon as possible the development plans that VAI has for the site.
VII. MANOR VAIL PEDFb-_r LAN BRIDGE
In light of item VI above, might it not be wu?Lhwhile to explore the possibility of
changing the pedestrian bridge to a point further east along the stream ---'to where
it would cross at a point just east of Building C of Manor Vail (there is an old bridge
0 bed at that location). In this way the parking facilities on Anholtz could be tied
more directly to the proposed new lift. People traffic could thus be routed more
directly into and out of the Golden Peak area.
r
r
?T-
r CCMMENTON T?tT V!-]IL MASTER PI AN
' `
Page Tree
t
0
II MAIN ENTRANCE FROM PARKING z).i.AOCTURE
The mein ccrrment here centered around the Inclinators. Since they serve a
stronger function than a stairway for moving people into the entry to town,
could they be somehow moved a bit_ east and made more a part of the main stair
area.
Should the Inclinators be re-evaluated?
1. They do not stop at levels inside the
Transportation Building.
2. They only move people 12 floors.
3. Baggage can be handled separately and by
more efficient means, i.e. elevators and
baggage trains.
4. Maintenance and opera- i -nal . problems are unknown,
5. Are they too "gi.m dcky" for Vail.?
ti
-10
,?,FIPvsiemJ6
l e e)
doo
fikso
?• M. ., u w w ?' F. Z L t '? ?'3 r O
G5
oa,ereo
,.
•
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, in accordance with Section 4.2
of the Home Rule Charter for the Town of Vail, that a special meeting of
the Town Council for the Town of Vail will be held at the hour of 2:00 o'clock
p.m., Thursday, August 16, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building, Vail, Colorado. The subject of discussion shall be the request
of Vail Associates, Inc., for a conditional use permit to allow the construc-
tion of a snow-making pumphouse in an area zoned "Agricultural."
DATED this 14th day of August, 1973, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock
a. m.
Town Clerk
0
I \
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
AUGUST 15, 1973
•
Notice having been duly posted 48 hours in advance of the meeting in two
public places within the Town of Vail and delivered to each Council member
setting forth the time and agenda of the meeting, a special meeting was
convened at 2:15 p.m., August 15, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail
Municipal Building.
Mayor John Dobson and-the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
•
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Fred Otto, Vail Associates
Doug McLaughlin
George Cannon
Mr. Cannon stated that his difficulties with Vail Associates have been
resolved. Mr. Gordon Pierce, who had done the drawings of the building,
explained some of the aspects of this building, including the portions to
be filled and the portions to be buried. He noted an additional suggestion
he has made, which is to separate the driveway to the building and the
bicycle paths. Mr. Otto submitted one of the agreements reached with
the property owners. Mr. McLaughlin noted that his clients have reached
a similar agreement with Vail Associates. He also mentioned that there
is a great deal of parking along Forest Road in the winter; Mr. Minger
indicated that the staff will look into the problem. He suggested, however,
that some of the residences in that area do not have driveways or driveways
sufficient for the number of cars.
As there was no further discussion, Councilman Donovan moved that a
conditional use permit be granted to Vail Associates for a snow--making
pumphouse in an "Agricultural" zone; Councilman Staufer seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer and Dobson voted in
favor, there were no votes against; the motion carried.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:30 p. m.
Z7'?r
Town Clerk
f vao*,,? /
.1
•
FROM THE DESK OF:
Fred Otto
Linda:
Hokin and Eihlein have not signed
their agreements--we're expecting them
soon.
0
a ,
AGREEMENT
This Agreement entered into this day of August,
1973, between VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., a Colorado corporation
(hereinafter called "Vail Associates"), and GEORGE R. CANNON
and SUE CANNON of Vail., Colorado (hereinafter called "Cannons").
WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Cannons are the owners of
certain real property located in Vail, Colorado, more particularly.
described as Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Village Sixth Filing, Eagle .
County, Colorado upon which is constructed'a,! -bedroom hous
(hereinafter called "Cannon Property");. and
WHEREAS Vail Associates desires to construct a pump-
house which will be located near the Cannon Property in a north-
easterly direction, which pumphouse will be used in. the operation
of making artificial snow and which will contain pumps, control
equipment and two diesel or electric compressors located out--
side but adjacent to the pumphouse building on the west-side
(the "Pumphouse"). The Pumphouse may also contain a timing
facility for ski races; and
WHEREAS, Vail Associates is seeking to obtain a con-
ditional use permit from the Town of Vail to construct the.
Pumphouse in its proposed location, which location is zoned'
agricultural and in order to obtain such a permit, the Board
--I-
of Trustees of the Town of Vail have requested that Vail
C
Associates enter into an agreement with'the Cannons and the
Cannons desire to enter an agreement with Vail Associates
governing the use and activity of the Pumphouse,
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, in consideration of
the following mutual covenants and agreements, agree as follows:
1. Vaal Associates agrees that it will construct
•
the Pumphouse substantially in accordance with the plans
rendered by the office of Fitzhugh Scott, an architect in
Vail., Colorado, which plans are dated August 9, 1973, and were
presented to the Planning Commission of the Town of Vail on
that date. Furthermore, Vail. Associates covenants and agrees
to comply with all the terms and conditions of that certain
memorandum of the Planning CUIMiLiSSion of the Town of Vail,
dated August 10, 1973, addressed to the Town Council., Town of
Vail., a copy of which is attached to this Agreement and is in-
corporated herein by reference.
2. Vaal Associates covenants and agrees that the
•
Pumphouse shall contain the following equipment and facilities
and no others: (a) water pumps and related control equipment,
(b) air nozzles and air hoses, (c) other tools and equipment
related to snowmaking, (d) workspace for the repair and maintenance
of the pumps and equipment described above, (e) the timing
.. facility which shall be used only in connection with ski races,
-2-
OF
(a) a garage capable of handling a vehicle necessary to service
the pumps and related equipment described above and (g) heating
.and ventilating equipment, utilities, plumbing facilities and
electrical wiring. Vail Associates agrees that the pumphouse
building will be used only for the purpose of making artificial
snow and for no other purpose and will contain only the pumps,
equipment and facilities described above.' Vail Associates
further covenants that the Pumphouse will be operated only dur-
ing the times it is reasonably necessary to manufacture snow.
Trucks and other vehicles will come to, leave, and will service
the Pumphouse only during.the time snow is being manufactured.
is 3 Vail Associates covenants.and agrees.that the Pump-
house,as physically described in paragraphs l and 2 above, shall
not be expanded or enlarged without the prior written consent
of the Cannons. However,.Vail Associates shall have the right
to enclose the area adjacent to the Pumphouse on the west, which
now contains two diesel compressors, without the necessity of
obtaining the consent of the Cannons.
4. The parties recognize and agree that the domestic
water availability and water pressure to the Cannon Property is
presently adequate for the comfortable use of the house. Vail.
Associates represents and guarantees that the use of its
artificial snowmaking equipment will not affect the present
-3-
adequacy of the water availability and water pressure to the
Cannon Property. If, during the term of this Agreement the
water availability or water pressure to the Cannon Property is
less than adequate, and it can be reasonably shown that the cause
of the inadequate water availability or pressure is due solely
to the operation of the artificial snowmaking equipment by Vail
Associates, Vail. Associates shall, upon written notice from the
Cannons, immediately take all steps necessary to restore the water
availability and/or pressure, which steps might include, but
would not be limited to installation of additional water lines
to the Pumphouse or the Cannon Property or similar steps.
5. In entering into this Agreement, Vail. Associates
a has represented to the Cannons that the operation of the pumps
contained within the Pumphouse will not generate any additional
significant noise level. The operation of the two diesel
compressors outside the Pumphouse will generate a noise level,
which will be noticeable outside and inside the Cannon Property
during the time artificial snow is being manufactured. If,
in the reasonable opinion of the Cannons, the total noise level
produced by the Pumphouse, the two adjacent compressors
and the vehicular traffic to and from the Pumphouse (but
excluding the operation of the nozzles which blow out the
artificial snow) interferes with the comfortable enjoyment
and livability of the Cannon Property, it being under-
stood that the residence protion of the Cannon Property is
?J
•
•
used for the entertainment of guests, the Cannon family and is
located in an exclusive ski resort area, then the Cannons shall.
have the rights set out in the remainder of this paragraph. The
Cannons shall give written notice to Vail Associates that the
noise level interferes with the comfortable enjoyment and
livability of the Cannon Property. Cannons may th€n retain,
at their expense, an engineer or other professional ex---
perienced in construction and noise abatement, to...investi-
gate and prepare a report on the construction of the Pump--
house, related facilities and the noise generated from its
use and traffic. If in the opinion of such engineer or other
qualified professional, the noise generated from the Pumphous.e,
related facilities,.its use and traffic can be lessened by modi-
fications, additions or improvements to the Pumphouse which
would not involve complete removal of the facility, or the com-
ponents thereof, then such report shall be transmitted to Vail.
Associates and Vail Associates shall, within 6D days after're-- .
ceipt of such report, make the modifications, additions.or im-
provements called for by such report. This 60-day time period
may be extended due to inability of Vail Associates to obtain.
labor, materials or on account of strikes,. weather or other
matters outside the control of Vail Associates. The first
X7,500.00 of the cost of such modifications, additions or improve-
ments shall be borne by Vail Associates and amounts of such cost
-5-
in excess of $7,500.00 shall be borne one--half by Vail. Associates
•
•
`J
and one-half by the Cannons. It is agreed, however, that the maxi-
mum monetary liability of Vail Associates under the foregoing
sentence shall not exceed $15,000.00
6. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors
and assigns of Vail Associates. This Agreement shall be personal.
to the Cannons and to any member of the Cannons' iimaediate
family, provided the Cannons transfer title to the Cannon
Property to any member of their immediate familyo "Immediate
Family" means the existing children of the Cannons. The Agree-.
ment shall expire on the date that (l) title to the Cannon
Property is conveyed and transferred to someone other than
the Cannons or their immediate family, or (2) five years, which-
ever occurs first.
VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC.
P C+,Lj.O L- - TD, sz N' S J
ATTEST;
t-,(-& L- ate
Sue Cannon
-6-
t
August 10, . 1973
MEMORANDUM
T0: TOIM COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION
RE: VAIL ASSOCIATES PUf4P MOUSE
In a meeting Thursday, August 9th, the Planning Commission reviewed
a revised plan from Vail. Associates for the Pump House to be located
down.at LionsHead. Based on that plan and with a few observations .
noted below, the Commission recommends to the Council that a Condi-
tional,Use Permit be issued for the building.
Following are a list of points discussed with Vail Associates which:'
should be made a part of the Permit:
A wooden gate and fence should be placed across the drive to
screen the compressors located just outside the west portion
of the building.
2. The deadline for absolute completion of the building, including.
all landscaping was set at July 15, 1974. In connection with
this, the Commission recommends that the Town be provided with
a detailed landscape plan for the project as soon as possible.
3. The requirement of 'a Performance Dond for landscaping was waived
.in view of the contractual agreements which Vail Associates will
enter into with various neighboring homeowners, repre'sented.by
Douglas McLaughlin, which stipulates that if Vail Associates does
not complete a satisfactory landscaping plan, the hom'eowne.rs may
come in and redo it ---- with the cost to. be borne by Vail. Associates.
4. if suitable to the site, the building may be rotated slightly on a.
clockwise basis -°- it was the fe'eling that this would actually
enhance the hidden aspects of the west elevation.
5. Vail Associates indicated that the west wall of the building may*.
be extended to the west at some future time to slightly enlarge .
the building. The Commission recommends that if this takes place,
the then west wall be faced with stone.
6. The Commission recommends that the outside air tank also be screened.
This would be accomplished by point #1 for the immediate future;
however, if the building is extended and the wooden gate taken down,
then the air-tank would require some additional screening.
7. `'here is a bit of a problem concerning the entrance road to
the building and the bike path which appears to run through it.
The Coaunission recommends that the entrance road be put to the
side of the bike path and be gravelled as shown on the plan.--
--------- . -..this will 'eliminate any confusion about the bike path being
actually part of the driveway.
s
x
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
AUGUST 21, 1973
t' A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:35 p.m., August 21, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Bu i Id ing.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey Jahn .Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Gerry White Tom Steinberg (for a portion only)
Also present were:
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Bob Manzanares, Administrative Assistant
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Gary Wall, Police Chief
Ordinance No. 9, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COMPREHENSIVE
SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND .PROVIDING FOR
THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SAME; REGULATING
THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, RESTORATION, ALTERATION,
LOCATION, LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS, WINDOW
SIGNS, FLAGS, PENNANTS, BANNERS AND BUNTINGS, DISPLAY
BOXES, RESIDENTIAL NAME PLATE SIGNS, SUBDIVISION ENTRANCE
SIGNS, TEMPORARY SITE DEVELOPMENT SIGN`, TRAFFIC CONTROL
SIGNS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, MURALS AND SU:PERGRAPHICS AND
PERMITTING AN:APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM; ESTABLISHING A DESIGN
REVIEW PROCEDURE AND GUIDELINES; PROVIDING FOR VARIOUS.
ADMINISTRATIVE, REVIEW AND APPEAL PROCEDUR ES; PROVIDING
PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF: ORDINANCE NO. 15 (Series'of 1967); and SETTING FORTH
MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for
second reading. The title was read' in ful-l by the Mayor and the audience
advised that copies were available. Changes in the ordinance made since
the first reading were discussed. Councilman Donovan questioned the pro-
vision giving the design review board discretion in regard to signs for base-
ment businesses. He found the proposed maximum size too large. Mr.` L.
Parker disagreed; he felt that if this discretion were not allowed, the first
floor business is given an unfair advantage. Mayor Dobson suggested that a
different approach would be to allocate a certain square footage of signs to
each building and allow the individuals within the building to work out further
arrangements within that limit. Mr. Parker suggested that another approach
would be to base the size of the sign on the square footage of the business.
Mr. Lamont stated that there would still be variations in size of allowable
signs under this method. He. further noted that there is some Flexibility
given through the option of sign programs for a building and joint directory
signs. After some further discussion, Councilman Donovan moved that the
option for below-grade business signs to be up to 12 square feet, at the discre-
tion of the design review board, be deleted in each of the four places in which
it occurs; Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid,
Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the
motion carried.
Councilman Staufer disagreed with the provision which prohibited the lighting
of traffic control signs' on private property. He moved that indirect lighting
of traffic control signs on private property be allowed at the discretion of the
design review board; Councilman Donovan seconded:, Councilmen Bailey,
Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were
no votes against; the motion carried.
Councilman Staufer suggested that the addition of a provision for selective
condemnation would result in a court proceeding to remove the Holiday Inn
sign, rather than encouraging negotiations for its removal. Mr. Lamont
noted that this provision had been requested at the first reading. There was
general agreement that the provision should remain in the ordinance.
1
i
•
1
Mr. L. Parker objected to the provision allowing a single business occupant
of a building a free-standing sign of 20 square feet irregardless of the frontage
of the business. After some discussion, Councilman Staufer moved that the
size limitations of a free-standing sign be calculated on the basis of lineal
front footage; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes
against; the motion carried.
The subject of the size of signs allowable in arcades was next discussed.
Councilman White moved that signs in arcades be limited to three square
feet; Councilman Donovan seconded;, Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid,
Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the
motion carried.
As there was no further discussion, Councilman Staufer moved that the amend-
ments proposed by the staff be approved, exclusive of the foregoing changes;
Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer,
White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion
carried. Councilman White moved, that Ordinance No. 9 be adopted as amended;
Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer,
White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried
and the ordinance was adopted.
Ordinance No. 12, AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING TO THE TOWN OF VAIL
CERTAIN TERRITORY SITUATED IN EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS VAIL VILLAGE II.th FILING,
ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF; ZONING SAID PROPERTY
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL;
AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO,
was introduced for second reading. The title was read in full and the audience
advised that copies were available. Mr. Rose clarified that the property is
being annexed under the old zoning ordinance, but that any improvements made
after annexation will be regulated under the new zoning ordinance. As there
was no further discussion, Councilman Staufer moved that Ordinance No. 12
be adopted; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes
against; the motion carried and the ordinance was adopted..
Ordinance No. 13, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING BICYCLE AND PEDES-
TRIAN PATHS WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL; REGULATING THE USE OF
SUCH BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHS; PROHIBITING THE USE THEREOF
BY CERTAIN VEHICLES.;AND LIVESTOCK; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY ALONG SUCH BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHS; PROVIDING
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND SETTING FORTH
MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for
second reading. The title was read in full and the audience advised that
copies were available. It was noted that the ordinance has been amended
to include the prohibition of livestock from these paths. Mr. Wall noted that
Vail Associates would like to use the portion of the path that leads to Gondola. I
for service to that gondola and for ambulances. Such an arrangement might
remove some vehicles from the core area. He further noted that there is no
provision for special permits in the ordinance as now written. Councilman
Staufer was of the opinion that, as the paths were constructed for a specific
purpose, the additional use should not be a l lowed . Mr. Elias inquired if the
bicycle path, in those portions where it follows the city streets, was to be
separated by a line in the future. Mayor Dobson noted that this would be
considered. Mr. Elias inquired if ordinances would be passed regulating
-2-
the manner in which bicycles are ridden. Councilman White noted that.
bicycles are bound by state statutes when on the public streets. Mr.. Weibel
inquired about the relationship of the Vail Associates pumphouse to the
bicycle paths. Councilman Langmaid noted that they have agreed to move
the bicycle path to the north and use the existing path for their driveway.
Trees will be planted between the two paths. Councilman Donovan moved
that Ordinance No. 13 be adopted as amended; Councilman Bailey seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg (who entered
during the foregoing discussion), White and Dobson voted in favor; there
were no votes against; the motion carried and the ordinance was adopted.
Ordinance No. 14, AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE REVVEW OF A LL
LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE SIGN
ORDINANCE, WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL; PROVIDING REVIEW PROCE-
DURES AND CRITERIA; ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE BONDING
THEREFOR; REQUIRING MAINTENANCE THEREOF; AND SETTING FORTH
MATTERS IN RELATION THERETO AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE
VIOLATION THEREOF was introduced for first reading by Councilman Langmaid.
The title was read in full and the audience advised that copies were available.
Councilman Langmaid moved that Ordinance No. 14 be approved on first reading;
Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer,
Steinberg, White and -Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the
motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to publish the ordinance for
public hearing at the next regular meeting.
• In regard to a request for a parking variance from Mountain Bell, Mr. Rose
reported that they have asked that this matter be postponed, The matter was
tabled until the next regular meeting.
Mr. Rose explained that the fees to be charged under the new zoning ordinance
were being submitted separate fromthat ordinance in order to maintain flex-
ibility. Councilman Staufer was of the opinion that the suggested fees would
not pay for the staff time involved. Mr. Rose noted that any outside consultant
fees would be paid by the developer. There was general agreement among the
Councilmen that the fees were too low. Mayor Dobson suggested that the mat-
ter be studied further.
Mayor Dobson noted that there are two applicants for the vacancy on the
Planning Commission: Dudley Holmes and Jack Fritzlen. After an informal
vote, the Mayor announced that Mr. Fritzlen had been elected to the Planning
Commission.
Mr. Jay Peterson asked that the variance request from Ernst Larese be tabled.
The matter was postponed until the next meeting.
0
Mr. Elias suggested that the Town impose a use tax. It was his opinion that if
this was done the additional 11/c sales tax might not be needed. Mr. Peterson
noted that the State currently collects the sales tax for the Town at no charge;
if a use tax were adopted, the Town would have to collect the tax itself. He
also suggested that the use tax is very involved administratively. Mr. Elias
felt that the tax should not be ignored just because it is difficult to administer.
Mr. Lapin added that tax is collected on the re-sale of property in a non-
incorporated form. Mr. Lamont added that a use tax is a declining source
of revenue as growth slows down. Mayor Dobson agreed to have Mr. Minger
and Mr. Bernstein prepare a report on the matter.
Mr. Weibel questioned several items on the voucher list for July. Councilman
Steinberg noted that, in regard to the meal charges, they actually represent
working time of the staff and hence, the cost is relatively inexpensive.
Councilman Donovan noted that some of the expenses noted by Mr. Weibel
are reimbursable . to the Town. Mayor Dobson noted that if Mr. Weibel
cared to look at the records in the Finance Department, he could do so.
He did agree, however, that possibly the information on the lists was too
-3-
brier. Mr. Weibel complained that his street has not been washed, while
the parking lots of the Councilmen have been. Councilman White noted that
it is town policy to wash commercial parking lots once after the snow melts.
Mr. Weibel suggested that not all lots were washed. After some discussion,
it was agreed that in the. future closer supervision of this policy will be
affected. Councilman Donovan noted that the flusher truck is currently
Is not operable.
Councilman Staufer inquired if the trailer. court above Sandstone is subject
to uni latera l annexation. . Mr. Crud Ley Abbott suggested that there is a piece
of property that lies between Sandstone and the trailer court that would be
the key to the annexation. Mr. Rose noted that the matter will be investigated.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved that the Town
Council adjourn at 9:40 p. m.; Councilman Lang maid seconded; approval was
unani mous.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was, convened at 9:40 p.m. The Rotary
Club had made application for a special events permit for August 25 and 26.
Mr. Wall reported that he foresaw no problems with the event. Councilman
Bailey moved that the special events permit application be approved; Council-
man White seconded; approval was unanimous.
As there was no further business, Councilman Bailey moved that the Local
Liquor Licensing Authority adjourn at 9:45 p. m.; Councilman White seconded;
approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk
•
•
-4-
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
SEPTEMBER 4, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 7.45 p. m. , September 4, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail
Municipal Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Ordinance No. 14, a proposed landscaping ordinance, was introduced for
second reading. Jen Wright suggested that it is not always practical to
construct walkways of native materials. Mr. Minger suggested that this
be changed to require natural materials where feasible. In regard to the
exception of Town of Vail projects from the provisions,. he suggested this
be changed to exclude only "minors" Town projects. Mr. McLaughlin sug-
gested that the definition of "new structure" has been omitted from the
ordinance; Ms. Toughill noted that this is an oversight. This definition
would be inserted, consistent with the definitions of the new zoning ordinance.
The matter was postponed until later in the meeting.
Ordinance No. 16, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING MUNICIPAL BORROWING
OF MONEY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000.00 TO SUPPLEMENT
THE GENERAL REVENUES FOR THE FISCA L YEAR 1973; AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE SHORT TERM NOTES TO
EVIDENCE SUCH INDEBTEDNESS FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING
FOR IRREPEA LABILITY AND THE LEVYING OF A TAX, IF NECESSARY, TO
ASSURE THE REPAYMENT OF THE BORROWING HEREIN AUTHORIZED;
AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO,
was introduced for first reading by Councilman Bailey. The title was read in
full and the audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Minger explained
that the borrowing is necessitated by the cash flow problems the Town experi-
ences at this time of year. He also noted that the entire amount authorized
will probably not be needed. Councilman Bailey moved that Ordinance No. 15
be approved; Councilman White seconded, Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes,
against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to publish the
ordinance for public hearing at the next regular meeting.
Ordinance No. 16, A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAI L IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for first reading by Councilman
White. The Title was read in full and the audience advised that copies were
available. Mr. Bernstein explained that the monies being appropriated included
$40,000 from the recreational fee fund for the bicycle and pedestrian paths and
monies from the federal revenue sharing fund. Mr. McLaughlin inquired if the
latter were matching funds; Mr. Minger replied that they were not. Mr. Elias
inquired why the expenditures were in excess of the budget; Mr. Minger replied
that the Town was not aware at the time of the budget preparation that they were
going to receive the funds. Mr. Elias noted that the paths have already been
built. The bills have not been paid. A member of the audience inquired how
the paths could be built if the Town did not have the money at the time. Council-
man Donovan replied that the Town did have the money; the ordinance just
authorizes its expenditure. Mr. Minger added that it was an expenditure in
anticipation of revenues. As there was no further discussion, Councilman
White moved that Ordinance No. 16 be approved on first reading; Councilman
Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Steinberg, White
and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried
and the Town Clerk vas instructed to publish the ordinance for hearing at the
regu Lar meeting.
The next matter on the agenda was, the proposed. schedule of fees to be charged
under the new zoning ordinance. here were mahy expressions from the floor
that the fees were not high enough, especially for the larger projects. Mr.
Minger emphasized that these are only design review fees. He noted that the
cost of a project is independently calculated by the building inspector on the
basis of a sliding state. A member of the audience asked if the fees might be
too high for minor variances. Mr. Minger noted that the administrative cost
does not vary in terms of the size of the variance requested. Councilman
Steinberg moved that a resolution be adopted incorporating the fees as presented;
Councilman Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Steinberg.,
White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried
Mr. Rob Garton explained that the cemetery on their property in Vail Inter-
mountain was originally used by the Ruder family, but several people from
outside the family have since been buried there. They would like to give this
cemetery to the Town, although this plot would not be adequate for the needs
of the Town. Councilman Steinberg noted that the Town is already in the
Minturn cemetery district, which might prevent the formation of another
district. Mr. Robinson noted that there are alternative means of organizing a
cemetery; the more important question is to decide the location and size of the
proposed cemetery. Mr. Garton noted that there is some land to the west of
this plot that they are attempting to trade to the BLM. This land might then
be available through the BUM. Mayor Dobson noted that the staff wilt be asked
to pursue the question.
Returning to the question of the second reading of Ordinance No. 14, Mr.
McLaughlin noted several additional objections. The genera l point was that
he found it totally unenforceable. After some further discussion, Mayor
Dobson noted that the matter would be tabled pending revisions.
Mr. Bernstein explained more fully the items on the July voucher list which
had been questioned at the last regular meeting. Mr. Weibel responded that
he felt the lodging expenses relating to John Lindsay's visit were excessive.
Mayor Dobson disagreed, noting that, in his opinion, the visit was very
productive. Councilman Donovan suggested that, in the future, the voucher
lists be formally approved. Councilman Langmaid suggested that this was not
necessary as the money has already been approved in the budget. Mayor Dobson
noted that, in the future, the Council wilt go over the voucher lists in advance of
the meeting. Councilman Donovan added that if there are any questions, Mr.
Bernstein can be contacted.
The minutes of the meetings of June 25, June 26, June 27, August 7 and
August 15 had been previously submitted to the Council. Councilman Steinberg
moved they be approved; Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mayor Dobson noted that the request for a variance from Ernst L.arese had been
withdrawn. It was noted that a fact sheet is available on the provisions of the
MaII Act.
In regard to parking for the winter, Mr. Minger noted that last winter there were
75 reserved spaces sold for $90.00 a space. There were also 25 short-term
spaces. This year the policy in regard to short-term spaces will be made more
clear to the public. Mr. Minger further noted that the physical lay--out of the lot
lends itself to 100 spaces of a special character. Mr. Elias inquired if the bus
terminal was to be moved; Mayor Dobson suggested that it was necessary to
-2-
further discuss this issue with the VRA. General agreement was reached
that the number of spaces reserved and the charge should be the same as
last year, with some over-selling of spaces.
In regard to the request for information on the use tax, Mr. Minger reported
that a comparison had been made of the potential revenues generated by a
sales tax and a use tax. The comparison resulted in the conclusion that the
use tax could not serve as a substitute for the sales tax. The burden of a
use tax would fall more heavily on the local resident, also. Mr. Elias noted
that he had proposed the use tax in addition to the sales tax. Mr. Minger
replied that if the Council and people wanted to collect such a tax, it could be
done. Mr. Frank suggested that it is possible to tax to too great an extent.
After some further discussion, Mr. Elias formally retracted his suggestion.
In regard to the arts and crafts A-Frame, Mr. Minger reported that Vail
Associates has agreed to make the building available for use for a minimum
period of three years. In addition, the Town is negotiating to obtain Site 24
at some time in the future. In order:to use the building this winter, an expendi-
ture of $15,000 for insulation, heat, etc. is necessary. Mr. Bernstein noted
that the funds would come from the existing additional cent sales tax. After
some discussion, Councilman White moved that $75,000 be allocated to improve
the A-frame; Councilman Donovan seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mr. Minger reported that a fact sheet on the bond issue will be prepared and
available on Friday. Mayor Dobson noted that the counter-suit filed by the
Antholz group has been dropped. A commission has been appointed to hear
the condemnation proceedings on December 10. An additional report given by
Mr. Minger was that the Town may sponsor a day care center above the: Clinic
after the elementary school moves. Directors have been e [ected from the
[Bighorn Homeowners Association; some of these directors favor annexation.
The Town is preparing petitions For this annexation. There was general
Council agreement that the staff should proceed with the work for this annexa-
tion. Councilman Steinberg inquired if this annexation could be completed in
time for the residents of the area to vote in the next Council election; Mr.
Minger did not think this could be done.
Councilman Steinberg noted .that the horse-drawn wagon operators are not
fulfilling their obligation to clean-up the droppings. Mr. Minger noted that
they will be reminded of their obligation. There was a suggestion from the
audience that the dog ordinance be more strictly enforced; Mayor Dobson
agreed that the staff would be instructed to do so. Mr. Frank inquired if
there were plans to tight the bike path; Mr. Minger replied that there are
plans to light the bridges, but that no decision has been made to go beyond
that. Mr. Weibel inquired if these paths would be plowed; Mr. Minger replied
that portions of them would be. A member of the audience suggested that
enforcement of the requirement for lights on bicycles be increased; Mr. Wall
noted that this could be done. Mr. Minger reported that Mr. Wall had been
appointed to the State Criminal Justice Council.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved that the meeting
adjourn at 10;00 p. m.; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
Town Clerk
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
SEPTEMBER 18, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:45 p.m., September 18, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the Following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Mr. Jim Peterson of the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments was
introduced. He explained that a meeting will be held on September 19 in
Eag le to se lest a municipal representative to this Counci t for Eag le County.
This Council acts as a clearing house, for federal funds. He asked that the
Town designate a representative to attend the meeting in Eagle. Council-
man Langmaid volunteered to act as the representative,
Ordinance No. 15, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING-MUNICIPAL BORROWING
OF MONEY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000._00 TO SUPPLEMENT
THE GENERAL REVENUES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1973; AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE SHORT TERM NOTES
TO EVIDENCE SUCH INDEBTEDNESS FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES;
PROVIDING FOR IRREPEALABI LITY AND THE LEVYING OFA TAX, IF
NECESSARY, TO ASSURE THE REPAYMENT OF THE BORROWING HEREIN
AUTHORIZED; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION
THERETO, was introduced for second reading. The title was read in full and
the audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson noted that no
changes had been made in the ordinance since the first reading. Councilman
Bailey moved that Ordinance No. 15 be adopted; Councilman White seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in
favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the ordinance was
adopted.
Ordinance No. 16, A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAI L. IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for second reading. The title was
read in full and the audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson
noted that no changes had been made in the ordinance since first reading.
Councilman Donovan moved that Ordinance No. 16 be adopted; Councilman
Bailey seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, White and
Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and
the ordinance was adopted.
Next to be considered was the appointment of two members to the Design Review
Board. Mr. Weibel reported that the Planning Commission, 3 members of
which are to be members of this Board, had decided to fill these positions on
a 3--month rotating basis. The Planning Commission had decided on this method
as the position could be very ti 'e-consuming. Mayor Dobson noted that the
Council might want to discuss this arrangement with the Planning Commission.
The list of applicants was read. An informal vote was taken and Mr. Lou Parker
and Mr. Bill Ruoff were elected to the Design Review Board.
The minutes of the meetings of Ju ly 16 and August 21 had been previous ly sub-
mitted to the Council. Councilman Donovah moved that these minutes be
approved; Councilman White seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mayor Dobson announced that a settlement had been reached for the purchase
of the Antholz property. A statement regarding this settlement was read in
full. Mr. Knox inquired if there was a possibility of litigation following a
direct sale. Mayor Dobson suggested that the possibility of litigation is
always present. Mr. Robinson added that the parties are agreeing to settle
the litigation as well as purchase the property. Once this is done, there
should be no reason for litigation between the parties to the agreement. The
} Mayor noted that it was the intent that the statement be technically true. Mr.
Abbott suggested that additional Council action was needed prior to the election;
Mayor Dobson indicated the Council willingness to do whatever seemed necessary.
A member of the audience, referring to a fact sheet previously mailed to the
citizens, asked if the parking structure rates were set at the minimum level
necessary to operate the structure. Mr. Bernstein noted that the tentative rates
would cover the operating expenses and 50% of the debt service, Councilman
Langmaid noted that they could be lover but, in that case, the structure could
run in the red. Mr. Bernstein added that if people refused to park in the
structure because of the cost, the charges would undoubtedly be lovse red. A
member of the audience inquired how many parking spaces are now available
in the main lot. Mr. Bernstein replied that there are currently 450; the
structure will increase. this number to 1000 with the potential for expansion
to 1500. Approximately two-thirds of the lot will be decked under the current
plan. Mr. Weibel inquired what would happen if the Forest Service required
free parking. Mayor Dobson did not think this would eliminate fees in the
structure; rather, it was his opinion that Vail Associates has recognized the
necessity of providing parking spaces elsewhere. Mr. Otto was of the opinion
that the Forest Service requirement would be only to have spaces available.
In regard to the transportation terminal portion of the structure, Mayor Dobson
reported that a different and cheaper design concept had been developed. It
was the intent to have several design concepts to present to the public for their
selection of the final design. A msember of the audience was of the opinion that
the construction costs are high because much of the landscaping costs are
absorbed into the construction costs. Mayor Dobson agreed that it is more
expensive to build a heav ly- landscaped building. A member of the audience
inquired about a pcssible convention center in the structure. Mayor Dobson
replied that such a facility was not included in these plans. It was his personal,
opinion that such a complex would be better located on the Antholz property.
However, it rests with the citizens to establish the priorities and the best
location, Mr. Minger noted that no agreement has yet been reached on the
Cornice property. The Town will have an appraiser consider the property.
The owners have submitted estimates of what they consider the .property to be
worth; however, these are not public information at this time, at the owner's.
request.
A member of the audience suggested that the structure would be inadequate
before it is Finished. It was his suggestion that money be invested in outlying
lots, which could furnish four times the amount of parking. Councilman Donovan
suggested that the core area and the lift facilities located there can only
handle a limited number of people; hence, care must be taken not to overbuild
parking. Councilman Donovan further noted that it has been agreed with Vail
Associates that 350 to 400 spaces will be available in the structure for the
day skier. Mr. Bernstein added that the parking is being designed to coincide
with the Vail Associates' projections of the Design Skier Day. It is adequate
for all projections up to 1977-78 ski season, without making use of the
expansion capability. Councilman Staufer suggested that, in regard to the
suggestion for outlying lots, the cost of transporting skiers from these lots
into Town would be expensive. The person in the audience agreed with this; he
maintained in light of this that the structure was too small and should be larger,
trregardless of cost. Councilman Donovan disagreed on the basis that it is not
desirable to overload the old core area. Councilman White added that several
different means have been used to calculate the number of automobiles necessary
to keep this core viable and that all have produced figures in the neighborhood
of 1000 cars. These calculations are available in the Town office and the
-2-
member of the audience was encouraged to study them. The discussion
ended with the reminder that as many meetings to discuss the issues will
be scheduled as are needed.
Ordinance No. 17, AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING AND APPROVING A
SETTLEMENT IN CIVIL ACTION NO. 1958 IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN
AND FOR THE COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, RELATING
TO THE CONDEMNATION AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE
WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAI L; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND THE DISBURSEMENT OF SAID FUNDS
IN EXCHANGE FOR A CONVEYANCE OF REAL ESTATE; AND SETTING
FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced
for first reading by Councilman: Langma.id. The title.was read in full by Mr.
Minger and the Mayor advised the audience that copies were available. The
Council was polled as to whether they had read and understood the ordinance;
each indicated that he had : C ounci l nnan Lang maid moved that Ordinance No. 17
be approved on first reading and published for public hearing at the next
regular Council meeting; Councilman Staufer seconded; Councilmen Bailey,
Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were
no votes against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to
publish the ordinance.
There was some discussion of the difficulties of keeping cars out of the core
Late at night. A permit system was suggested for residents of the area; the
Mayor indicated that work would be done in this regard. Mr. Weibel inquired
if the pedestrian area would be expanded to the roadway by the Kiandra this
winter. Mayor Dobson indicated that the residents of the area would like to
try the system. Mr. Minger, added that total agreement has not been reached.
Returning to the problem in the current pedestrian area, Mr. Wall noted that
ticketing is not the answer as issuing the ticket does not remove the car. If
the cars are towed, there is no safe place to put them.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved that the Town
Council adjourn at 9:30 p.m.; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was
unanimous.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was convened at 9:30 p. m. to consider
an application of Riley-Vail corporation for an expansion of the premises. Mr.
Riley explained that they would Like to expand into the area previously occupied
by Vali--Hi bookstore. The outside entrance would be enclosed, thereby making
the proposed area a self-contained entity. He indicated that they will meet
the health regulations. There would be 65 to 70 additional seats. Mr,. RiLey
indicated that he is willing to sign an agreement to provide parking. Mr.
Robinson noted .that the enclosure of the stairwell would not result in an
increase of F.A.R. He also suggested that, while it is: an important question
to be resolved, the parking is not necessarily germane to the question of a
liquor license. Councilman Staufer noted that he did not approve of the idea
of using spaces in a parking structure to allow for urban renewal. There was
some further discussion of the question of parking. Councilman Donovan
moved that the request for an expansion from RiLey-Vail corporation be
approved; Councilman Bailey seconded.; approval was unanimous.
As there was no further business, Councilman White moved that the Local
Liquor Licensing Authority be adjourned at 10:00 p.m.; Councilman Bailey
seconded; approval was unanimous.
Town C leek
'W__
-s-
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING.
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
OCTOBER 2, 1973
A regu tar meeting of the Town Counci I of the T own of Vai L was convened at
7:45 p.m. , October 2, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Joseph Langmaid Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Also present were;
Terry Minger, Town Manager Larry Robinson, Town Attorney,
Bob Backus, Bond Attorney
Councilman White introduced and Councilman Staufer moved the approval on
first reading of Ordinance No. 19, AN ORDINANCE TO CONTRACT AN
INDEBTEDNESS ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AND
UPON THE CREDIT THEREOF BY ISSUING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
OF SAID TOWN IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $3,000,000 FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PAYING, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, THE COST OF ACQUIRING
APPROXIMATELY 39 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE, THE COST OF ACQUIRING
NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND WATER AND SEWER LINES TO AND FROM
SAID REAL ESTATE, AND THE COST OF LANDSCAPING THE SAME;
PRESCRIBING THE FORM OF SAID BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY
OF TAXES AND FOR THE APPLICATION OF SALES TAX REVENUES OF
THE TOWN OF VAIL TO PAY SAID BONDS AND THE INTEREST THEREON,
which was read in full by Mr. Backus. Councilman Langmaid seconded the
motion, and the question being upon the approval on first reading of said
Ordinance, the roll was called and Councilmen Langmaid, Staufer, White and
Dobson voted in favor, there were no votes against. Four members of the
Council present having voted in favor of the approval on first reading of the
Ordinance, the presiding officer thereupon declared the Ordinance duly approved
on first reading and directed that the Ordinance be published once in full in the
Vail Trail, a legal newspaper of general circulation within the Town of Vail,
on October 5, 1973, and that a hearing on the ordinance be held at the next
regular meeting.
Ordinance No. 17, AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING AND APPROVING A SETTLE-
MENT IN CIVIL ACTION. NO. 1958 IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE
COUNTY OF EAG LE, STATE OF CO LORADO, RE LATING TO THE CONDEM-
NATION AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE WITHIN THE TOWN
OF VAIL; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS UPON CERTAIN
CONDITIONS AND THE DISBURSEMENT OF SAID FUNDS IN EXCHANGE
FOR A CONVEYANCE OF REAL ESTATE; AND. SETTING FORTH MATTERS
AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced For second reading.
The title was read in Full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies of
the ordinance were available., Mr. Robinson noted that no changes had been
made in the ordinance following the first reading. Councilman Stauffer moved
that Ordinance No!. 17 be adopted, Councilman White seconded; Councilmen
Lang maid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes
against; the motion carried and the ordi nance was adopted.
Ordinance No. 18, AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CERTAIN ACTS, INCLUDING
DISTURBING THE PEACE, UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY AND RIOTING; PROVID-
ING FOR PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND SETTING
FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced
for first reading by Councilman White. The title was read in full by the Mayor
and the audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson noted that
this ordinance was prepared at the request of Chief Wall and that a similar
provision had been inadvertently omitted when the codification of ordinances
was prepared. Mr. Wall explained that, although such offenses are covered
by state laws, the Town would rather handle such problems in the local court.
This is not possible without a local ordinance. Councilman White moved
that Ordinance No. 18 be approved on first reading and published for public
hearing at the next regular meeting; Councilman Langmaid seconded;
Councilmen Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted in favor; there were
no votes against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to
publish the ordinance for public hearing.
Ordinance No. 20 A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAIL IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for first reading by Councilman
White. The title was read in full and the audience advised that copies were
available. Mr. Minger explained that this ordinance appropriates the $15,000
authorized at the last meeting for improvements on the A-frame. The Mayor
noted that sketches of the proposed improvements and additions are available
for public inspection. The building will be administered by the town and used
by the public for cultural activities. Ms. Boyd inquired if the number of cars
in the area would be increased by the expansion. Mr. Klinger replied that it
is not the town's intention to provide a great deal of parking in the area.
Councilman White moved that Ordinance No. 20 be approved on first reading
and published for public hearing at the next regular meeting; Councilman
Langmaid seconded; Councilmen Langmaid, Staufer, White and Dobson voted
in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk
was instructed to publish the ordinance for public hearing.
Mr. Robinson noted that a draft agreement with Vail Associates regarding
the deeding of the main parking lot had been prepared. Mr. Otto noted that
he had thought the uses would be Limited to parking. Mr. Minger suggested
that it was the desire of the town not to be limited in regard to unforeseen
uses. Mr. Otto agreed this was acceptable. [At this juncture, Mr. Robinson
left the meeting. I Councilman Staufer stated that the provision for Forest
Service approval of rates wz4s bothersome to him; he was most concerned
that they would decide that no charges could be made. Mr. Minger noted that
there is on File a letter from the Forest Service indicating that they find
charging for parking proper. Councilman Langmaid added that it would be
difficult to prove that "free" is necessarily reasonable. Mayor Dobson sug-
gested that it was stilL a good idea to obtain a firm commitment from the
Forest Service. The matter was tabled pending further discussions.
Next to be discussed were the parking requirements for changes of use within
the core area. The Mayor explained that, obviously, the Council does not
want parking to be provided in the pedestrian core; yet, there is a requirement
for the provision of parking prior to a change of use. In the case of the Riley--
Vail corporation request, there is no increase in the bulk of the building;
however, the new use has a greater parking requirement. Mr. McLaughlin
noted that there are two comparable situations that they hoped would be decided
at this meeting, the Gondola Ski Shop and the ,Mountain Haus Health Center.
Councilman White noted that he was not in favor of doing away with the parking
requirement as it is the only control the Council has on urban development in
the core area. He was against selling spaces in the parking structure and
suggested that variances could be given in cases where the outside dimensions
of the building did not change. In further discussion, it was brought out that
neither project being discussed had formally filed for a variance. Councilman
Staufer agreed that a parking variance should be granted except in cases where
the exterior dimensions or appearance of a building would be changed. Mayor
Dobson suggested that it would be acceptable if the Design Review Board con-
sidered and approved any exterior decorative changes. Discussion turned to
the technicalities of filing for a variance. The earliest date that these could
be heard at a regular meeting would be November 6. It was proposed that
perhaps a special meeting be called following the required publication of notice.
A member of the audience objected to the change of residences to commercial
uses. There was some argument that, in fact, no greater number of cars to
be housed are generated by commercial uses. Mayor Dobson noted that the
possibility of action under the Mall Act and the definition of the rights to the
streets are also connected with this problem.
Page 2
•'
Mr. Minger reported that a solution has been found to the day care center
problem, at least for the coming winter,. The area above the hospital in
the west portion of the clinic will be available for one year, after the school
moves to its new facilities. Mr. Bernstein noted that the remodeling neces-
sary to utilize the building would cost the Town $1,000 and Vail Associates
$1,000. The construction would include partitions and restrooms. There
would be two separate areas; one for tourists and one for local children.
Mr. Gagne added that the Vail Associates' program would be available to
locals; however, it would not be a structured program. It is anticipated that
the Vail Associates' program would again accommodate 30 children. The
other half of the space would be shared by the pre-schools of Ms. Brenden
and Ms. Lemon. Mr. Minger noted that the individual people will be respon-
sible for their portions; the Town will provide the adequate and proper space.
Some of the people present were of the opinion that the Town should actually
operate the school. Mr. Minger stated that the Town could do this, if the
Council so desired. There was some discussion of whether the two pre-
schools should be encouraged to operate jointly. A suggestion was to separate
the 2500 square feet available to the Town into two rooms. The cost in this
case would increase to $4,000 or $5,000 for the Town. Mr. Minger suggested
that this was not wise as the room could on ly be used for 1 year. Mr. K lug
suggested that Vail Associates should add more restrooms to their portion in
order to increase the capacity of their facility. Mr. Bernstein noted that the
rent for the Town's portion of the space will be $100 per month from each
school; the schools are responsible for their own utilities.. Mr. Klug suggested
that it was not the correct approach to only rent the space. He suggested that
the Town oversee the operation. Mr. Minger noted that this could be done,
although he preferred that the Town not become involved in day-care at this
time. The Mayor suggested that a committee of local parents appointed by
the staff serve as an advisory committee. He asked each member of the
Council if he approved of renting 2500 square feet to Ms. Lemon and Ms.
Brenden for $200 per month from November ' 1.,5 to Apri l 15 For use as a day-
care center for local children. Councilmen White, Langmaid and Staufer
each indicated his approval.
Ms. Bosshart and Ms. King were present to discuss their proposed sleigh
operation. The sleighs they would use would seat four people and be drawn
by one horse. The horses would be housed west of Vail. They would take
reservations for rides and also operate in a taxi-cab Fashion. Chief Wall
noted that a license would be needed only if the sleighs were used in CCI and
CCII. Mr. Minger noted, that, in any event, the Council should regulate the
safety aspects of the operation. Ms. King noted that they will cleanup any
mess themselves. They intend to operate around the core area and also on
the cart paths on the golf course. They also have two carriages to be used
when there is no snow on the roads. The charge would be $4.00 to $4.50 per
half hour. For short rides, there might be a base rate which has not yet
been determined. In regard to lighting, Ms. King indicated that they are
willing to do whatever is required. They both have experience in driving
sleighs and will obtain insurance. Mayor Dobson asked if, assuming that access
is limited to certain streets and that safety requirements are met, the Council
would be in favor of the operation. Councilmen White, Lang maid and Staufer
each indicated that he would be in favor. Mr. Minger indicated that an agree-
ment would be prepared regarding the matter.
Mr. Rose indicated that the proposed zoning. for the Bighorn area is at such a
stage that it should be presented to the Council and the public. A. public meeting
was set for a week from Thursday. A study session will be held prior to that
meeting. Mrs. K lug stated that many of the projects in Lionshead do not have
construction fences. Mr. Rose noted that 'the bui dding inspector will look into
that. Mrs. Klug inquired about the desirability of the Eagle County Planning
Commission adopting the zoning 'ordinance and master plan at their next meet-
ing. Mr. Minger noted that the Town has already endorsed the master plan.
Mr. Rose noted that the zoning ordinance is more a land-use plan which is
needed immediately. Councilman White moved that a resolution be adopted
supporting the passage of the Master Plan and zoning ordinance; Councilman
page 3
Langmaid seconded; approval was unanimous. Councilman White noted
that the Council should have a meeting with the Eagle County School Board
to discuss an elementary school on the Antholz property. Mayor Dobson
indicated that this would be scheduled.
As there was no further business, Councilman White moved that the ar eeting
adjourn at 10:30 p.m.; Councilman Langmaid seconded; approval was
unanimous.
Town Clerk
•
•
Page 4
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
OCTOBER 16, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p. m. , October 16, 1973, in the Counci I Room of the Vai l Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
Joseph Langmaid
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Also present was Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
The meeting was first convened with the Council acting as the Local Liquor
Licensing Authority. An application for a 3.2% Malt Beverage License had
been received From Daniel E. O'Brien. The Mayor inquired if anyone was
present to make a presentation on behalf of the application; neither the
applicant nor a representative was present. The Mayor then stated that-
without the applicant present to support his application, no public hearing
could be held. The matter was continued until the next regular meeting.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
The Town Council was convened at 7:45 p. m. Ordinance No. 18, AN
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CERTAIN ACTS, INCLUDING DISTURBING
THE PEACE, UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY AND RIOTING; PROVIDING FOR
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND SETTING FORTH
MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for
second reading. The title was read in full and the audience advised that copies
were available. Mr. Robinson noted that there had been no amendments or
revisions since the first reading. Councilman Staufer moved that Ordinance
No. 18 be adopted; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan,
Langmaid, Staufer and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against;
the motion carried and the ordinance was adopted.
The Mayor informed the Council and the members of the public present that
Ordinance No. 19 (Series of 1973) relating to the issuance of General Obliga-
tion Bonds, Series November 1, 1973, in the principal amount of $3,000,000,
which was introduced, read in full for the first time and ordered published at
a regular meeting of the Town Council held on October 2, 1973, was inadver-
tently published in The Vail Trail on October 5, 1973, with mistakes in the
Ordinance as published, requiring that the Ordinance be republished in full
in said newspaper on either October 19 or 26, 1973. The Mayor a leo informed
Council and the members of the public present that it would be necessary to
set over the date of the public hearing on the proposed Ordinance from this
evening to the next regular meeting of the Town Council, November 6, 1973.
Thereupon, Councilman Bailey introduced a motion providing for and moved
that Ordinance No. 19 (Series of 1973), as approved on first reading by the
Town Council on October 23 1973, be published once in full in The Vail Trail,
a legal newspaper of general circulation within the Town of Vail, on either
October 19 or 26, 1973, and in addition that a public hearing on proposed
Ordinance No. 19 (Series of 1973) and the date thereof shall be set over from
this evening and shall be held by the Town Council at 7:30 p. m. on Tuesday,
November 6, 1973, at the Town of Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Councilman Langmaid seconded said motion, and the question being upon the
adoption of said motion, the roll was called with the following results: Council-
men Dobson, Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid and Staufer voted yes; there were
no votes against. Five members of the Council present having voted in favor
of the adoption of said motion, the presiding officer thereupon declared the
motion duly adopted and directed that Ordinance No. 19 (Series of 1973) be
published once in full in The Vail Trail, a legal newspaper of general circula-
tion within the Town of Vail, on either October 19 or 26, 1973.
Ordinance No. 20, A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAIL IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for second reading. The title was
read in full and the audience advised that copies were available. Mr. Robinson
noted that there had been no changes in the ordinance since first :reading.
Councilman Donovan moved that Ordinance No. 20 be adopted; Councilman
Bailey seconded; Councilmen. Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer and
Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and
the ordinance was adopted.
A list of proposed judges and clerks for the election on November 20, 1973,
had been submitted to the Council. The names were read by Mr. Robinson.
Councilman Donovan moved that the list of judges and clerks and alternates
for the November 20 election be approved; Councilman Staufer seconded;
approval was unanimous.
The minutes of the meetings of September 4 and September 18, 1973, had
been previously submitted to the Council. Councilman Donovan moved they
be approved; Councilman Bailey seconded; approval was unanimous.
Mayor Dobson acknowledged receipt of petitions regarding the Cable TV service.
He noted that the Council will address itself to that problem in the near future.
A request for a conditional use permit for a coin-operated laundry in the Vail
21 Building had been received from Levis Pennock. Mr. Robinson noted that
both the Planning Commission and the Building Department had indicated their
approval of the project. Councilman Staufer moved that a conditional use
permit be issued for the coin-operated laundry; Councilman Donovan seconded
approval was unanimous.
Mayor Dobson entered into the record a letter from H. F. Kepner stating that
he would not be in favor of any variance in z.oning,in the general area of the
Vail Village 2nd Filing.
Councilman Donovan moved.,that the salaries for the Mayor and Councilmen
be increased for the upcoming term to at least $100 per month for the Council-
men and $200 per month for the Mayor. There was some discussion of the
procedure by which this could be accomplished. Mr. Robinson was of the
opinion that an ordinance would be needed. Mr. Elias and Mr. Weibel agreed.
that such an increase is justified. Mr. Weibel suggested that the increase
should be even greater. Mr. J. Peterson suggested that it is important to
remember that it would not be desirable to have people running for the posi-
tions in order to receive the salary. Mr. L. Parker inquired abort expense
accounts for the Mayor and Councilmen. The Mayor noted that if any of them,
incurs a direct expense, it can be reimbursed. Mr. Bernstein noted. that no
Councilman has submitted a claim for reimbursement for several years. There
was general agreement that expense accounts were not needed. Councilman
Donovan amended his motion to increase the salary to $150 for the Councilmen
and $400 for the Mayor. Mr. Weibel suggested that this was a good thing as it
might enable people who could not otherwise afford it to hold these offices. Mr.
Bernstein disagreed that $400 per month was appropriate for the Mayor. He
suggested that a salary of $5,000 a year makes the Mayor too much of a profes-
sional. Councilman Donovan amended his motion to $350 per month for the
Mayor; Councilman Bailey seconded. Mr. Bernstein. noted another objection,
which is that a substantial salary for the Mayor breaks down the Council-
Manager, form of government. Councilman Staufer agreed with the motion
for $150 for Council and $350 for Mayor. There being general agreement, a
recess was called at 8:45 p.m. while the ordinance was being prepared.
The meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m. Ordinance No. 21, AN ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHING AND PROVIDING FOR THE COMPENSATION FOR. THE
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAT LAND THE MAYOR FOR THE TOWN
-2-
•
• 0
OF VAIL, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS IN RELATION
THERETO, was introduced for first reading by Councilman Donovan. The
title was read by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies were avail-
able. Councilman Donovan moved that Ordinance No. 21 be approved on first
reading and published for public hearing at the next regular meeting; Council--
man Langmaid seconded; Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer
and Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried
and the Town Clerk was instructed to publish same For public hearing.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the meeting
adjourn at 9:25 p.m.; approval was unanimous.
??`--'"
?
'
Town Clerk
•
a
-3-
•
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL. OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
NOVEMBER 6, 1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened
at 7:40 p.m., November 6, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
The Mayor opened the meeting with a statement of thanks to the Council
members and the staff as this was the last meeting of the current administration.
Discussion of the Cable TV situation began with an explanation of the situation
by Mr. Robinson. As the franchisee is filing a complaint in the District Court
in order to determine the status of the franchise, the matter will not be re-
solved for a few months. During this time, the cable company has agreed to
provide service. Mr. Elias asked that the major differences between the town
and the company be outlined. He asked, for example, the status of public
access TV. Mr. Lamont clarified that what was asked for in the negotiation
document was a studio located in Town at some unspecified point in the future.
Mayor Dobson added that they do not object to providing a channel for a
closed--circuit local programming system; the company's questions related
to who would bear the cost. Of greater importance, however, is the fact that
the court judgment regarding the legality of termination of the franchise must
be rendered before the exact status of any particular points can be finally
determined. The Mayor emphasized that efforts will be made to solve what-
ever problems exist while the matter is in court. Mrs. Gramshammer suggested
that many people would rather be without television for a while if they could be
guaranteed good service when television is available. Mr. Elias was critical
of the fact that arrangements had not been made for another company to provide
service if the present company refused to continue. He also suggested that it
was unfair for the subscribers outside of the Town boundaries to have their
service discontinued as a result of the actions of the Tovn officials. The
Mayor noted that the cable company had indicated that they could not terminate
service only within the Town limits. Mr. Elias inquired if arbitration would
proceed with the present company. Mayor Dobson noted that it would. There
was some further discussion of what actions could have been taken short of
discontinuation of service. A member of the audience inquired if a community-
antenna had been considered. Mayor Dobson replied that a translator operation
was a possibility. However, in the long-run this would not be desirable as
locally originated programming would not be possible. In response to the
question of whether this would be less expensive, the Mayor noted that the
Eagle translator is rather old and might require some capital investment
in the future. There would also be an original capital investment required
to begin the operation in Vail. This system would depend on voluntary con-
tributions .for its support.
Minutes
Regular Meeting
Town Council
November 6, 1973
•
•
A member of the audience asked a representative of the cable company,
Mr. Schoen, if his company was desirous of remaining in Vail. Mr.
Schoen declined to comment, saying that a decision on the matter would be
a time-consuming process. In response to a question, the Mayor noted
that one point of contention had been whether bulk rates for lodges should be
applied to some condominiums. A member of the audience noted that as
he does not have a picture for a significant amount of the time, he thinks
perhaps he should pay only a portion of his bill. Mr. Robinson noted that
such a course could be attempted; however, such an approach ignores the
causes of outages. He suggested that this approach was valid in cases of
failure of the system for a week or more, Councilman White added that a
committee would be formed to monitor picture quality, which should prove
helpful in substantiating such claims.
Mr. Riley asked if some of the difficulties were economic ones. Mr. Schoen
replied that such problems are a major part of their difficulties. A member
of the audience stated that this same company accepted a franchise in another
city with a rate of $5.00 per month only last year.. After some further dis-
cussion, Mr. Minger noted that the major points of negotiation were picture
quality, undergrounding, the extension policy in the Town, rates, service
response, and additional services. Many companies had indicated interest in
the Town, but would not begin discussions while there was a Franchise in
existence with another company. There was some discussion of the difficulties
of continuing negotiations while at the same time fighting a court battle over
whether termination is possible. Mayor Dobson suggested that it was essential
to determine the questions of whether termination is possible, irregardiess
of the outcome of the negotiations.
A member of the audience inquired if FM radio was included in the negotiations.
Mr. Schoen indicated that it had been a solid point of negotiation. Mr. Strauch
suggested that each individual TV subscriber cease to do business with this
company. At this point, discussion of Cable TV ended for the evening.
Ordinance No. l9, AN ORDINANCE TO CONTRACT AN INDEBTEDNESS ON
BEHALF OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO,.AND UPON THE CREDIT
THEREOF BY ISSUING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF SAID TOWN IN
THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $3,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING,
IN WHOLE OR IN PART, THE COST OF ACQUIRING APPROXIMATELY
39ACRES OF REALESTATE, THE COST OF ACQUIRING NECESSARY
EASEMENTS AND WATER AND SEWER LINES TO AND FROM SAID REAL
ESTATE, AND THE COST OF LANDSCAPING THE SAME; PRESCRIBING
THE FORM OF SAID BONDS; AND PROVIDING' FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES
AND FOR THE APPLICATION OF SALES T.AX,REVENUES OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL TO PAY SAID BONDS AND THE INTEREST THEREON, was introduced
for second reading. The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience
advised that copies were available. The Board was polled as to whether they
had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had. Councilman
Staufer moved that Ordinance No. i9 be adopted; Councilman Donovan seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg,White and Dobson
voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the ordinance
was adopted.
Ordinance No. 21, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AND PROVIDING FOR
THE COMPENSATICN FOR THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAI L
AND THE MAYOR FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS
AND DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for second reading.
The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies
were available. The Council was polled as to whether they had read and under-
stood the ordinance; each indicated that he had. Councilman Bailey moved
that Ordinance No. 21 be adopted; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in
favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the ordinance adopted.
Page 2
Minutes
Regular Meeting
Town Counci I
November 6, 1973
Ordinance No. 221 A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAI L IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced For first reading by Councilman
Langmaid. The title was read in fu l l by the Mayor and the audience advised
that copies were available. Mr. Minger explained that such ordinances are
needed when revenues have been received and expenses incurred that were not
foreseen when the budget was adopted. Councilman Langmaid moved that
Ordinance No. 22 be approved on first reading; Councilman Staufer seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and
Dobson voted in favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and
the Town Clerk was instructed to publish the ordinance for public hearing
at the next regular meeting.
Ordinance No. 23, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING MUNICIPAL BORROWING
OF MONEY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $115,000.00 TO APPLY TO THE
PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE IN ANTICIPATION OF THE SALE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS, AS AUTHORIZED BY THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS IN
A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND TOWN
MANAGER TO EXECUTE SHORT TERM NOTES TO EVIDENCE SUCH IN
DEBTEDNESS FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES;PROVIDING FOR IRREPEA L-
ABILITY AND THE LEVYING OF A TAX, IF NECESSARY, TO ASSURE THE
REPAYMENT OF THE BORROWING HEREIN AUTHORIZED; DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE
AS AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced by Councilman White.
The title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies
were available. Mr. Robinson explained that the borrowing authorized was
in anticipation of the sale of the bonds for the Antholz property. These bonds
would be sold on November 15. Councilman White moved that Ordinance No. 23
be adopted as an emergency. ordinance; Councilman Steinberg seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson
voted in favor; there were no vote I s against; the motion carried and the ordinance
was adopted. The Town Clerk. was instructed to publish same.
Ordinance No. 24, A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAI L IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973; AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced by Councilman Staufer. The title
was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies were
available. Mr. Minger explained that this ordinance appropriates 3.2 million
dollars for the acquisition of the Antholz property. Councilman Staufer moved
that Ordinance No. 24 be approved on first reading and published for public
hearing at the next regular meeting; Councilman Donovan seconded; Councilmen
Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in
favor; there were no votes against; the motion carried and the Town Clerk was
instructed to publish same for public hearing.
Resolution No. 34, which authorized municipal borrowing of $3,000,000 from
the First National Bank of Denver was introduced. Mr. Robinson explained
that the amount was also to be applied to the purchase of the Antholz property
in anticipation of the sale of the bonds. Councilman Donovan moved that
Resolution No. 34 be adopted; Councilman Staufer seconded; Councilmen Bailey,
Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in favor;
there were no votes against; the motion carried and the resolution was adopted.
Page 3
Minutes
Regular Meeting
Town Council
November 6, 1973
i
9
W
r
In regard to a parking variance requested by Lions Square Lodge, Mr. Klug
asked that this matter be postponed. In regard to the forthcoming Counci l
election, Mr. Robinson explained some of the, requirements for candidacy.
He noted that there _ also might be one instance in which a difficulty
would arise in regard to the conflict of interest provision in the Home Rule
Charter. In response to a question from the audience, it was noted that the
person with the possible conflict is Mr. Lapin. Mr. Lapin indicated that he
thinks he has a way to handle. the possible conflict. The minutes of the meetings
of October 2 and October 16, 1973, had been previous ly submitted to the
Council. Councilman Staufer moved they be approved; Councilman Steinberg
seconded; approval was unanimous. Councilman Staufer suggested that, in
the future, the matter of compensation for members of appointed boards
should be considered.
As there was no further business, Councilman Donovan moved the Town
Council adjourn at 9:35 p.m.; Councilman Staufer seconded; approval was
unanimous.
The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was convened at 9:35 p.m.
Prior to the consideration of the application of Daniel E. O'Brien for a 3.2%
Malt Beverage License, Mr. Staufer excused himself from the meeting.
Mr. Robinson noted that the application had been originally published for
hearing on October 16; at that time the hearing was continued until this meeting
as a result of the absence of the applicant. The file supporting the application
is in order. Mr. Robinson further noted that the burden of proof of the needs
or the neighborhood is on the applicant and that people were present to oppose
the application. The Town Clerk noted that no petitions had been received
either for or against the application. Mr. O'Brien noted that he was proposing
a 3.2 beer take-out license, to be used in conjunction with a convenience--type
grocery operation. Mr. Ruder, Mr. O'Brien and Mr. Bux man were sworn in
by the Town Attorney. Mr. O'Brien testified that his intent was to expand the
type of operation he currently has in Breckenridge. He indicated he would
open the grocery store with or without a liquor license. Mr. O'Brien was of
the opinion that another 3.2% beer outlet would be needed as a result of the
growth of Vail and the fact that there are only 2 other outlets. His store would
be open from 7:00 a. m. to 11:00 p. m. , 7 days a week. They have completed
all Town of Vail requirements except the sign requirements.
Mr. Fred Butler, representing a member of the opposition, asked Mr. O'Brien
if he would like to continue the hearing to a later time. Mr. O'Brien did not
think this necessary. Mr. Butler then continued to cross-examine Mr. O'Brien
as to the reasons he feels the outlet is needed. Mrs. O'Brien, who was sworn
in, testified that Breckenridge and Vail could be compared in that they were both
resort towns and they have been successful in their operation in Breckenridge.
She also felt the hours at which they would be open contributed to establishing
the need for the operation.
Mr. Ruder testified that, as, owner of the Keg, it was his opinion that the needs
of the neighborhood are being met at this time. As a rebuttal, Mr. O'Brien
suggested that Mr. Ruder has a pecuniary interest in the denial of the license.
Mrs. O'Brien stated that Mr. Ruder could not be serving the needs of the
neighborhood as his establishment caters mainly to the 18 to 21 year old age
group.
Page 4
Minutes
Regular Meeting
Town Council
November 6, 1973
Mr. Buxman testified that, as general manager of K & J Supermarkets, Inc.,
he felt the neighborhood was the Town of Vail and the Gore Valley. in that
neighborhood there are currently four (4) 3.2% beer take--out licenses. The
proposed license would be located within a block of his supermarket. He
reported that they had not received any complaints that they did not serve the
needs of the neighborhood. He presented some petitions he had circulated
around the Crossroads area opposing the granting of the license. He considered
it a random sample. The signers read the petition before signing. Jake Vigil
helped in the circulating.
There were over 50 signatures on this petition. Mr. Buxman testified that
his store is open from 8:00 a. m. to 9:00 p.m. On holidays these hours are
extended to 7:00 a. m. to l2 midnight. After some further discussion, Mr.
Dobson noted that the Authority would render its decision in writing within
30 days and that the applicant would be notified by registered letter.
Next to be considered by the Local Liquor Licensing Authority was an
application from "Total Team Joint Venture" for a beer, wine and liquor
license for the Hilton Inn at Vail. Mr. Robinson noted that the premises
would include the entire hotel. The file was in order. No petitions had
been received for or against the application. Mr, Harry Boner, of -the
joint venture, stated that he would be the manager of the facility. He
suggested that a liquor license was essential to the operation of a first-class
hotel. At this point, Mr. Boner and Mr. Richard Elias were sworn in as
witnesses. Mr. Donovan suggested that perhaps Mr. Boner would like to
supplement his application with further evidence of the needs of the neighbor-
hood. Mr. McLaughlin added that a denial of the license would be very
significant. In that case, the venture could not reapply for two years. Mr.
Robinson added, however, that the supplementation of the application was at
the discretion of the applicant. After some further discussion, Mr. Elias
suggested that it would be beneficial if the procedures of the Authority were,
in general, streamlined. Further, he suggested that it had always been known
that a liquor license would be applied for at that location. After some further
discussion, Mr. Boner asked ',fora donttnuance of the hearing. The Authority
continued the hearing to Wednesday, November 14, at 2:00 p. m.
The Blue Cow, Donovan's Copper Bar, Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc., Lancelot,
Inc. , Lord Gore Ltd . , Vail Village Inn, Inc., Bully III, Lionshead Liquor
Store, the Wine and Liquor Shop and the Liquor Store at Vail had all made
application for a renewal of their liquor license. Mr. Wall, the Police Chief,
indicated that his department had received good cooperation from each of the
license holders in policing against violations. As there was no further, dis-
cussion, Mr. Steinberg moved that the licenses be approved for each of the
above-listed applicants; Mr. Bailey seconded; Mr. Donovan and Mr. Staufer
abstained; Mr. Bailey, Langmaid, Steinberg, White and Dobson voted in
favor; the renewals were approved.
As there was no further business, the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Linda Hall
Town Clerk
rj
Page 5
MINUTES
SPECIAL. MEETING
LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY FOR THE TOWN OF VAI L
NOVEMBER 14, 1973
A special meeting of the Local Liquor Licensing Authority for the Town
of Vail was convened at 2:15 pm, November 14, 1973, in the Council
Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Chairman John Dobson and the following members were present:
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Also present was Larry Robinson, Town Attorney.
The application for a beer, wine and liquor license for Total Team Joint
Venture was first considered. The public hearing had been continued from
the meeting of November 6, 1973. Hence, some evidence had been previously
taken. Mr. Stewart Brown and Mr. Fred Butler were present to represent
the applicant. There was no one present :to object to the application. Mr.
Harry Boner and Mr. John Brown were sworn in as witnesses. Mr. Boner
testified as to his experience, the structure and purpose of the joint venture,
his role in this venture and his familiarity with Vail. There was also some
testimony as to the size of the hotel and its convention facilities. Mr. Boner
testified that he and his partners had determined that such a facility, with
a liquor license, was needed after conducting a market study.
Mr. John Brown testified that he had lived in Vail for 3 and one-half years
and had worked in various restaurants during. that time. Throughout this
employment he had observed the inability of these facilities to serve the
needs of the guests in Vail. He had also had difficulty, as an individual,
in locating dining facilities in Vail at various times. Mr. John Brown had
circulated petitions in favor of the application for four days. He felt the
signers had been selected in a random manner. These petitions were sub-
mitted as evidence. Mr. John Brown testified that he had no relationship
with the applicant. Mr. Stewart Brown noted that the intended opening
date of this facility is December 15 and urged that the Council act with haste.
Mr. Dobson noted that the Council would render a decision, in writing,
within 30 days and that a copy of this decision would be sent to the applicant
at the address shown on the application.
Mr. Robert French was present representing Toph's Downstairs II. Mr.
Robinson explained that, due to an oversight, the liquor license for this
establishment had remained in the name of another corporation. Hence,
a new application has been filed. As the premise has been previously
licensed, a complete hearing is not necessary. Letters' of recommendation
and financial statements were submitted. Fingerprints have been given to
Chief Wall. After some further discussion, Mr. White moved that a license
be granted to Toph's Downstairs II, Inc.; Mr. Langmaid seconded; approval
was unanimous.
Mr. Staufer moved that the l-icerse- for Total Team Joint Venture be approved;
Mr. White seconded; approval was unanimous.
?L Mr. Jay Peterson was present to discuss the matter of re-opening of the hearing
on the application of Daniel E. O'Brien for a 3.2% beer license. Mr. Robinson
noted that this might be possible as no decision has yet been made by the
Authority. After some further discussion, Mr. Peterson noted that Mr. O'Brien
would withdraw his application and re-submit it at a. later time.
Liquor Licensing Authority
November 14, 1973
Page 2
As there was no further business, the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
adjourned at 3: 10 p. m.
Town Clerk l
rj
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAT L
NOVEMBER 21, 1973
A special meeting of the newly-elected members of the Town Council
for the Town of Vail was convened at 7:40 P.M., November 21, 1973,
in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
The following councilmembers were present:
John Dobson
John Donovan
Kathleen Ktug
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Thomas Steinberg
Gerry White
A [so present were:
Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
Is Larry B. Robinson, Town Attorney
The first order of business was the swearing in of the new Town Council
by Mr. Robinson. Councilman Donovan moved that Mr. Dobson be
appointed Mayor and Mr. White be. appointed Mayor Pro--Tem. Council-
man Langmaid seconded; Councilmembers Steinberg, Staufer, Donovan,
Langmaid and Klug voted in favor; there were no votes against; the
motion carried and the appointments were approved.
The Council then convened as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and
the following licenses were reviewed: Bridgewater Inn, Inc.; K & R
Casino, Inc.; Clock Tower Inn; Cokan Enterprises, Inc.; Holiday Inn
of Vat L, Hot Ly Vail, Inc.; La Pinata, Inc.; Left Bank Restaurant; Lodge
at Vail; Manor Vail Condominium Association; Nelson-Fick, Inc.;
Pistachio's; Purcell's; Red Lion Inn, Inc.; Riley Vat1 Corporation;
St. Moritz Tavern LTD.; Vait Metropolitan Recreation District; Vail
Valley Enterprises, Inc.; Gotden Peak Restaurant; Lionshead Terminal
Restaurants; Harvest Table; High Country, Inc; and Toph's Downstairs.
The Town Clerk verified that all Liquor License applications were in
order. Mayor Dobson asked for questions or comments. A list of
violations during 1973 was given to the councilmembers. Mr.
Langmaid moved to approve all license renewals; Mr. Donovan
seconded; Messrs. Dobson, White, Steinberg, Donovan, Staufer,
Langmaid and Ms. Klug voted in favor; there were no votes against;
the motion carried and the 1974 license renewals were approved.
As there was no further business, the liquor licensing authority
adjourned at 8:05 PM .
The Mayor then expressed his sense of honor and appreciation for
being re-appointed Mayor for the Town of Vail. He then introduced
Mr. Eldon Beck to the audience. Mr. Minger explained that this meeting
would be. a continuation of previous meetings on the subject of Bighorn
annexation with the purpose of discussing environmental impact and
restrictions in p.tanning for the area. Mr. Beck then explained the
topographic maps and diagrams which are to be used in the formation of
a land use plan. INSTAAR had supplied Mr. Beck's firm with avalanche
data as a reference for planning buildable land areas. He commented
November 21, 1973
Page 3
Some parts along the roadway are too steep for building. The next step
for planners would be in this area. He suggested small group meetings
in December to discuss this and to continue community dialogue and then
proceed with a land use diagram. A member of the audience asked how
close .to the covenants Beck would be likely to stay. Mr. Shapiro asked
Mr. Robinson what the legal view would be if there were a conflict between
the Town of Vail zoning regulations and the ECDC covenants. Mr.
Robinson replied that restrictive covenants would be enforced by civil
action. If zoning were more restrictive than the covenants, then the
covenants could not override. Past violation of restrictive covenants would
not allow license in the future. Undeveloped land outweighs developed land.
Mr. Donovan noted that at some point in the near future a vote will have to
be taken to determine annexation desirability. Mr. Welch, president of
the Vail East Property Owners' Association, urged that the question of
annexation be determined as soon as possible. He commented that the lack
of turnout at this meeting was the' lack of interest of the property owners
of the area. Messrs. Riley and Shapiro expressed the desirability of
forming small interest groups. A discussion ensued concerning the best
method of getting the small groups together. Mr. Welch commented that.
continued dialogue between the Town and the developers would provide many
answers to the questions now.,,.being asked. A member of the audience stated
that the present covenants should be followed closely so that the home owners
would be reasonably assured of having the land remain in its intended use.
Jay Utter requested that those who do not agree with his use plan as a
developer of the land make themselves known to him so that a dialogue
might ensue. The key to the process is knowing the intentions of the de-
velopers, with the crux of the issue revolving around density in certain
areas. A member of the audience commented that since neither the developer
nor the resident is a planner, they could not solve the problems alone since
some areas in Bighorn are not even covered under the protective covenants.
Ms. Carmody asked at what stage the meetings between the Town and the
Bighorn developers were; Mayor Dobson noted that preliminary meetings
had taken place and that Mr. Beck was consulted as a first step. He re-
quested that Mr. Welch set up meetings with home owners and Mr. Riley
set up meetings with developers.
Mr. Beck asked for the Bighorn meetings to be set up in two weeks from
this date over a two--day period. He would request better information from
INSTAAR by that time in order to provide further accuracy in the , matter
and the determination of logical land use planning on a.tentative basis. Mr.
Welch expressed his concern over the quality of building development and
materials used. Mr. Beck asked for documented intent of the developers in
relation to the four major categories of land use. Whmen t i6, ecessary
information is assembled, meetings can be set up. This information was
requested by November 28, 1973. December 6, 7, 8 or 7 and 8 are tentative
dates for these meetings.
The Mayor announced that a public hearing would take place on Monday,
November 26, for the purpose of presenting the 1974 Budget for the Town
of Vail to the public.
Since there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
;#U.4-140- ;E ?.
V salie Jeffrey
Town Clerk
November 21, 1973
Page 2
on the interdependence of the entire valley and expressed the opinion
that Bighorn represents a unique living experience. Regarding the
legal aspect of the development, he noted that questions would fall into
four categories: (1) density; (2) the role of commercial development;
(3) the retention of open space; (4) trail systems and transit systems.
The 1-r7O will affect the area in sound as well as sight. With regard to
the four categories, Mr. Beck made the following comments:
(1) Low density would be more favorable than high density,
with the answer to the density question falling between the
two extremes.
(2) A range of minor commercial businesses would be helpful
to the community. There would be no economic feasibility for
a highly commercial enterprise. Physical characteristics
must be considered.
(3) Mr.- Beck questioned the desirability of a broad range of
recreational facilities and re-emphasized the fragile character
of the area. The audience was then requested to comment on
the subject. Mr. Ron Riley asked about the validity of the
documentation in the INSTAAR study. Mr. Beek replied that
he has only received notes on the final report, and must await
further information. Mr. Riley then queried the relationship
between theory and reality in this situation. Mr. Beck was of
the opinion that we must rely on INSTAAR's ability to determine
potential hazards. Mr. Minger commented that these findings
are preliminary and the INSTAAR group would be available to
explain their findings in detail. Hazard potential must be determined
in relation to building in the area. Mr. Minger felt that the
avalanche areas must be viewed to exist as a potential hazard and
then evaluated with other characteristics of the area. Mr. Abe
Shapiro asked whether property that is known to be avalanche area
would be allowed to be built on. He inquired as to the provisions
made for property owners who might not be allowed to build.
Mayor Dobson stated that these are all considerations to be dealt
with but that we cannot get answers `immediately. A member of
the audience commented that continued wrong usage of land makes
a problem even greater and potentially hazardous land should not
be built upon. Mr. Riley asked what kind of living units Mr. Beck
would like to see in Bighorn.: Mr. Beck replied that the impact
would be bad on a low density area if other parcels of land were
allowed to be high density. A 'final decision can be made by -taking
certain -areas that show a dominant pattern: and determine the
particular logic. Definite values must be assigned to various
areas to determine the logic in land use planning. Mr. Welch
stated that an I--70 interchange is planned for Pitkin. He asked
what the planned use would be for the adjacent land. Mr. Beck
stated that the value of the land must be protected in an area such
as this.
The audience was again asked what they would like to see done in Bighorn.
Councilman Steinberg commented that the developers must get together to
use the land for recreational purposes. Mr. Welch felt that the areas
around the interchange should be kept clear so that the visual impact would
be minimal, and that the geographical location should be assessed so that
any commercial services would service the residents rather than travelers
on the freeway. More than the 50% of the residents of that area are
'absentee' owners. Mr. Beck was asked where he would recommend
putting a commercial center, and he replied that from the Interstate east
would be the place to consider but not all the way to the east. end.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
. NOVEMBER 26, 1973
A special meeting of the Town Council For the Town of Vail was
convened at 7:40 PM, November 26, 1973,' in the Council Room
of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following councilmembers were present:
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Joe Langmaid
Kathy K lug
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Also present were:
Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
The Council first convened as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
for the consideration of 1974 license renewal applications for the Ore
House, Ichiban, Alain's Creeksde Cafe', and the Nu Gnu. Councilman
Steinberg moved that these renewal applications be approved; Council-
man White seconded the motion; all councilmember,s voted in favor of
the motion; the motion carried and the renewals were approved.
The Town Council then convened for the initial public hearing of the 1974
Budget for the Town of Vail. Due to the energy crisis, the Mayor
commented that the budget. should. be reviewed more carefully with a
view to problems that might arise' within°the coming year. This would
include town activities, projects, etc. He stressed that concern for the
overall situation is very much in order. The Mayor questioned the lack
of interest on the part of the public and commented that a continuation of
the council's work sessions might be in order. The budget would be
divided into (l) administrative expenses and (2) programs. These two
basic issues are the ones where pub:iic input is, necessary.
Mr. Minger then explained his philosophy of municipal budgeting. The
1974 Budget is the first one prepared since the Home Rule Charter has
been in effect. He referred to the charter as the basis and form of the
public hearing. There will be two more public hearings at which the
first and second readings of the budget ordinance will be read. He noted
that a budget is a comprehensive plan expressed in financial terms and
in which a municipal policy is made. He commented that Mr. Bernstein
has worked on the 'base' budget for the past three months. He then
outlined the three steps of the budgetary process: (l) budget preparation;
(2) consideration and adaption; and (3) execution of the fiscal plan itself.
Staff objectives for the coming year are to maximize expenditures in the
following areas for the implementation of the Vail Plan - to include:
([)transportation; (2) new recreational programs and facilities; (3) beautifi-
cation of additional areas in the town; and (4) cultural programs. Emphasis
will be placed on minimizing 'housekeeping expenses' and the hiring of
new employees. Mr. Minger noted that thirty per cent of the requests
from department heads were cut from their proposals. For the first time,
the town manager has requested that each department head submit a list
of goals and objectives for the following 12 months to be reviewed on a
quarterly basis. Regarding the uncertainty of the future, Mr. Minger said
November 26, 1974
Page 2
00 that Vail is in its best fiscal posture of its history. Hiring commitments
are being withheld. The 'perFormance' and 'program' aspects of the budget
allow for the cutting of such programs as might be deemed to have Lower
priority for 1974.
Mr. Bernstein then delineated certain details of the budget, summarizing
various categories. A discussion ensued concerning the use of funds
available for particular projects.
Mr. Minger commented that he and Mr. Rose, town engineer, had
discussed the construction of a bridge to the AnthoLz and possible
bikeway so that the area could be used as soon as possible. He also
said that the pay plan will be presented to the Town Council for their
review. Mr. White then requested a breakdown on how the budgets of
the various districts relate to the Town.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 PM.
41
Respectfully submitted,
Rosalie Jeff yluvl
A
Town Clerk
6
F " \
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
NOVEMBER 27, 1978
A special meeting of the Town Council for the Town of Vail was
convened at 7:35 PM, November 27, 1973, in the Council Room of
the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following councilmembers were present:.
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Joseph Langmaid
Gerry White
Kathy K Lug
Tom Steinberg
Also present were:
Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
Lawrence B. Robinson, Town Attorney
Mayor Dobson opened the meeting by introducing the problem of
parking in the core area. A member of the Planning Commission was
asked to state the problem as the commission sees it. Mr. Merv
Lapin, commission member, explained the commission's concern with
the present parking situation as it relates to the core area. A
change of use creates a parking requirement change. Questions asked
by the planning commission include: (1) Should the core area become
more pedestrianized? (2) What do we feel the use of this area should
be? (3) Where can we provide parking for the businesses that presently
exist there? He commented that the "Mall Act" :allows a community to
specify an area in a town designated as a pedestrian area only. Mayor
Dobson then asked for the audience to respond to his question, "What
do we want the core area to be?" Diana Toughill, zoning administrator,
stated that an additional 55,000 square feet could be converted to
commercial space in the core. This would not include the possible
construction of new commercial buildings. Figures on current com-
mercial space are not-i known.
Mr. Staufer remarked that the biggest mistake of the new zoning ordinance
was to eliminate the Floor Area Ratio requirement. The parking is the
only 'handle' the Town has to control the core area, he noted. Off-street
parking requirements are unconstitutional in the State of Colorado so that
this 'handle' may not have much strength. Mr. Staui'er is opposed to
further commercializing of Bridge Street and felt that the Council would
require more time to come up with a solution to this problem. He urged
that the Council consider the FAR or.some sort of vertical zoning where
commercial space is on the ground floor.
Mr. Donovan commented that.he doesn't have the answers to the problem
and needs more time to think. He ,: sees the town's responsibi lity to the
day skier, and further commercialization would push the day skier out.
a
I \\
November 27, 1973
Page 2
Councilman Steinberg noted the problem of street and parking congestion
in the core and agreed that the council would require time to consider
the problem and make the correct decision.
Councilman White stated that he felt the concern is more with how
changes of use will affect the core area and the traffic in that area.
He sees parking requirements and use requirements as the Town's
controls for this problem. He would be interested in some sort of 'use'
clause in the zoning ordinance and would like to hear comments from the
Bridge Street owners and residents.
Councilman Langmaid was in agreement with the councilmembers and felt
that vertical zoning was a possibility with shops on the first floor of
buildings.
A member of the audience commented that one result of commercial area
plazas which close after working hours is that these are areas where people
do not live thus do not use for social activities 'after-hours'.
Councilman Staufer moved to declare a 60 to 90 day grace period
where there will be no parking variances or exemptions granted in the
Town of Vail.
Mr. Dudley Abbott emphasized the need to deal evenhandedly throughout
the town. The Mayor asked if there were any objections from the people
to have a grace period. Mr. Jay Peterson then questioned the legality of this
meeting in dealing with the problem formally. Mr. Dick Elias questioned
the method of the Council in arbitrarily determining the 'grace period'.
Councilman Steinberg questioned the possibility of setting the date of
March 1, 1974, to coincide with the parking structure decision. It was
decided that this could be handled as a public.policy decision by the
council, and Mayor Dobson recommended that the council not grant any
variances for a period of approximately 60 to 90 days.
Mr. Peterson stated that he felt there would be difficulty arising if the
Council made a motion regarding the granting of variances at this meeting.
He recommended more public coverage and publicity of all actions taken
by the council. Mr. Robinson, town attorney, recommended that the
council act as informally as possible on this issue. Change of use questions
would not be affected by not granting variances if no further parking would
be required to change said use, i.e. no additional. square footage needed.
It was generally agreed that 90% of the situations that would arise would be
covered by this policy statement.
Councilman Staufer's former,. motion was retracted , and a policy statement
was made by the Mayor to the effect that during a period of approximately
60 days, the planning and zoning commissions should come before the
council with recommendations regarding the parking situation in commercial
core one. Councilman White was of the opinion that there should be more
concrete action taken to make certain that the zoning ordinance is a legal
document. Mr. Robinson said that in his opinion variances are not a right
of the applicant. Councilman Donovan felt very strongly that the council
must have a legal right not to grant variances. A member of the audience
commented that in his opinion the problem was of a change of use nature,
but that the parking variance question is merely a handle for this. Mr.
Robinson was of the opinion that to prohibit someone from a change "'from
one use to another, a stronger statement must be made by the council
Mayor Dobson stressed the council's desire to act in good faith. The
problem is scheduled to be discussed at the next regular meeting to decide
ho/v this will be dealt with fairly. Mr. Elias reminded the council that the
planning commission has been against 60% of the variances granted recently.
November 27, 1974
Page 3
The opinion of the council must be made public and available to the com-
munity at large. Mayor Dobson replied that the recommendations of
the planning commission cannot be taken 'carte blanche'; its position is
an advisory one. It is not legislative in nature. The Charter of the
Town of Vail states that the council must be the legislative body. He
noted that the two groups will meet jointly to further discuss the problem.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
4
Rosalie Jeffrey
Town Clerk
Ll
•
•
SUMMARY
SPECIA L MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAT L
DECEMBER 3, 1973
The Town Council of the Town of Vail decided to authorize
Terrell J. Minger to proceed with the signing of a contract
with Pre-Stress of Colorado.
Said contract is to be terminable by the Town of Vail any time
between now and March 1, 1974, with the understanding that the
Town wi l l be responsib le for the cost of any and a l1 work that
Pre-Stress has done up to the time of termination.
A unanimous vote was cast in favor of this proposal. There
were five council members present: Messrs. Dobson, Staufer,
Langmaid, White and Ms. Klug. Absent councilmen were
Later polled. Both Councilman Donovan and Councilman Steinberg
voted in favor of the proposal.
The contract with Pre-Stress of Colorado and the contractual
arrangement with Hyder Construction Company and James Ream
shall not be subject to termination after March 1, 1974.
t
Town Clerk
G
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
DECEMBER 4, 1973
The regular meeting of the Town Council for the Town of Vail was convened
at 7:40 PM, December 4, 1973,. in the Council Room of the Vail. Municipal
Bu i Iding .
Mayor John Dobson and the following councilmembers were present:
John F. Donovan
Josef Staufer
Joseph Langmaid
Gerry White
Kathy K Lug
Tom Steinberg
Ordinance No. 22, A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAIL IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for second reading. The title was
read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance
were available. Councilman Donovan moved that'Qrdtnan6i`-Nb-:-22 be approved
as read; Councilman Steinberg seconded the motion; Counci [members Staufer,
Langmaid, White, Donovan, Steinberg, Klug and Dobson voted in favor; the
motion carried and the ordinance was approved on second reading.
Ordinance No. 24, A SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING `THE-
EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS BY THE TOWN OF VAIL IN EXCESS OF THE
TOWN BUDGET FOR 1973, AND SETTING FORTH MATTERS AND DETAILS
IN RELATION THERETO, was introduced for second reacting. The title was
read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance
were available. Councilman Staufer moved that Ordinance No. 24 be approved
as read; Councilman White seconded the motion; Councilmembers Donovan,
Steinberg, Langmaid, Staufer, 'White, Klug and Dobson voted in favor; the
motion carried and the ordinance was approved on `second reading.
Ordinance No. 25, ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE: ADOPTING A
BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING SUMS OF MONEY TO DEFRAY EXPENSES
AND LIABILITIES OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, FOR THE TOWN'S
FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1.;,9 1974, AND ENDING ON THE LAST
DAY OF DECEMBER, .1974, was introduced by Councilman Steinberg. The
title was read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies were
available. Mr. Minger explained that various revisions have been made to
the budget regarding certain contingency items listed therein as a result of the
energy crisis. These would include withholding the purchase of new equipment,
hiring of personnel and not proceeding with planned projects. Councilman
Langmaid moved that Ordinance No. 25 be approved on first reading, Council-
man Donovan seconded; Councilmembers Donovan, Langmaid., White, Steinberg,
Kiug and Dobson voted in favor; Councilman Staufcr voted against; the motion
carried and the Town Clerk was instructed to publish same for public hearing.
Mayor Dobson commented that a meeting' was held this date with representatives
from Vail Associates, Vail Res..cyrt Association and the Town of Vail present
at which time'the Vail Community Committee was formed. The committee
members include: Dale McCall, Dick Elias, Warren Klug, Paul Johnson,
Chuck Johnsos, Dick Peterson, Terrell J. Minger, John Dobson, and Bill
Pierce. The purpose of this group is the mobilization of whatever programs or
t
F \
December 4, 1973
Page 2
activities are needed to meet the needs of the community as a result of
the energy crisis. The committee is involved in raising funds to maintain
the operation of the information center at Stapleton Airport in Denver, has
guaranteed the addition of extra Trailways buses to their schedule for Vail,
has made arrangements to aid stranded visitors, and is providing 24-hour
telephone service for the visitor through the V.R.A.
Mayor Dobson commented on revisions to the design of the Transportation
Center and directed the audience to the most recent plans from the architect.
He indicated that certain changes had been made with economics in mind
The Town Council has signed a contract with Hyder Construction Company
for the purchase of the pre-stress concrete. He explained that there is
flexibility in the matter and the Town has the freedom not to proceed with
the parking structure as late as March 1, 1974.
With regard to the Continental Trailways bus terminal facilities, the Mayor.
noted that preparations are underway for a terminal to be located in the
west end of the Lions Head parking lot in the very near future. Shuttle bus
service will be extended to the bus station in order to meet late arrivals.
The reason for moving the terminal to another location is the difficulty
experienced by the buses in entering and exiting the present east Lions Head
parking lot during the winter months.
Resolution No. 35, RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH GUIDELINES AND
SUGGESTIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY BY TOWN OF VAI L
EMPLOYEES AND THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE, was introduced and
read by the Mayor. A discussion ensued regarding the consumption of
energy for swimming pools in the town. 'Mr. McCall was asked his opinion
and replied that V. R .A . has not yet taken a stand , but he has found that
most hotel owners are in favor of closing the pool. Councilman Staufer
commented that the heated pool is the single greatest waste in town. Mr.
Shapiro questioned whether an emergency ordinance could be passed to
shut all the pools in the town. Mayor Dobson noted that there is no legal
counsel for the meeting. Mr. McCall then suggested that the resolution be
amended to include members of the community at large in the recommendation
for the use of car pools, in addition to town employees. Councilman Donovan
moved that Resolution No. 35 be adopted as amended; seconded by Councilman
White; Councilmembers Donovan, Staufer, Klug, Steinberg, Langmaid, White
and Dobson voted in favor; the motion carried and the energy conservation
resolution was adopted.
Judy Leman, Director of the Rumplestiltskin Nursery, thanked the Town of
Vail and its staff for being very helpful in providing a location for the nursery
and giving assistance where there was really a need.
John Carmody, Director of the winter ice skating program, reported on the
status of the ice rink and thanked the townspeople for having him back for
another year. He announced the following events: 1) :December 26 -- special
holiday event program; 2) December 29 --- benefit by World Skating Team;
3) January 19 -- invitaticnal ice dancing weekend; 4) February 16 and 17 --
carnival of ice skating; 5) special programs for Battle Mountain High School
students and Avon children to use the ice during the day from 12 - 2 pm;
6) hockey program -- last year's program was very successful with three
junior hockey teams. Dave Sage reported that fifty 5 - 13 year old children
played their, first hockey game earlier in the evening. Men's games will
take place on Saturday mornings. Mr. Carmody noted that the rink wi l I be
open for public skating until 5 PM for the convenience of the school children.
r
December 4, 1973
Page 3
Mr. Jay Peterson, the attorney representing Dr. Peter A. Wells, a new
dentist in the area, presented to the Council detai is of a request for a parking
variance in CCI. Dr. Wells is converting two rental units in the Pension
Isabel/Schober Building to office space thus changing the use from one type
of commercial use to another. He stated that Dr. Welts has already applied
for both a variance and an exemption in order to meet the parking requirements.
After a discussion with the former town attorney, Mr. Robinson, Mr. Peterson
advised Dr. Wells to apply solely for an exemption, based upon previous
determinations by the Council, in particular the granting of an exemption to
The Slope. He urged the Council to make a similar determination. Mr. Sage
re-stated the opinion of the Planning Commission which is opposed to granting
the variance. Mr. Schober, owner of the building, stressed the difference
between applying for a 'change of use' and applying for a building permit, the
issuance of which is subject to the fulfillment of the parking requirements.
Councilman White asked for the reasons for turning down the variance and
Mr. Sage replied that increased traffic to the area due to the presence of
the office (doctor, secretary and patients), would constitute a hazard to the
health, safety and welfare of the community. Mr. Peterson tried to impress
upon the Council the similarity of this.request to that of the Slope and that if a
parking variance were granted for that establishment, then Dr. Welts should
also be granted a variance. Mr. Lapin commented that the planning commission
is attempting to lessen the density by eliminating the need for traffic in the
core area. In agreeing. with Mr. Peterson that these are important problems,
Mayor Dobson stated that the Council and the Planning Commission should
meet as soon as possible to decide how the whole situation should be handled
immediately. Mr. Peterson suggested that the Council seek legal advice.
Mr. Warren Klug and Mr. Jim Cunningham presented their request for a
parking variance for Lionsquare Lodge. They requested a change from
parking space to meeting space in an area of approximately 3,000 square
feet due to the inadequacy of their present meeting facilities. Mr. Klug
presented petitions from residents of the LionsHead area in favor of the
additional meeting space. Mr. Cunningham commented that the present
contractual agreement with the Vail Associates LionsHead Terminal Building
is not adequate, and that the additional meeting space would be a benefit
to the whole LionsHead area. The present contract with V. A, is rather
ineffectual, according to Mr. Cunningham, since the school is located in
the same building, and in the summer the Vail Institute uses it. Mr.
Cunningham disagreed with the Planning Commission's recommendation
,. that the granting of this variance would generate more parking spaces, but
?r emphasized its benefit to the Town. He asked that his situation.be regarded
individually and stated that his problem causes a hardship. Mr. Jack Fritzlen,
of the Planning Commission, stated that the Council is actually rehearing the
presentation made to the Planning Commission and that they are getting the
wrong opinion since Mr. Cunningham is making a different proposal than the
one the Planning Commission heard. On Councilman Steinberg's request,
Mr. Cunningham agreed to sign an agreement stating that he would buy or
reassign the area in question to parking if needed. Mr. Bud Benedict, from
Antlers Condominium, reemphasized the necessity of having convention space
in the area for the benefit of LionsHead. Without convention facilities, it is
felt that summer business cannot survive. 'Mr. Schober commented that his
understanding was that the Planning Commission' is an advisory board; he
cannot see how this board could make recommendations that have no legal
basis at all. Discussion ensued regarding the necessity of having this space
available in LionsHead. Mr. Fritzlen noted that need was not considered, but
felt that the precedent would be set if this variance were granted. The following
options were discussed; 1). purchase of parking spaces in a transportation center
built in Lionshead; 2) purchase of parking spaces in a transportation center in
Vail Village; or 3) to take out the convention space if the parking spaces are
needed at a later date.
December 4, 1973
Page 4
Councilman Steinberg asked if Mr. Cunningham would be willing to
add eleven spaces without the consideration of financial handicap.
Mr. Cunningham replied that this would be physically possible.
Mayor Dobson stated that he would like to proceed with this variance
request in the same manner as Dr. Wells' request and meet with the
Planning Commission on the issue. He stressed the function of the
commission as being advisory in nature, thus being unable to make
such decisions as need be made by the Counci I.
Mr. Minger appointed Rosalie Jeffrey as the new Town Clerk according
to Section 6.5 of the Home Rule Charter.
Mr. Minger then gave the following statistics for winter parking facilities:
total spaces - 1,495; Antholz - 1 , 000, on-street parking - 125. Parking
approval is pending for use of the Frontage Road during the winter months.
Approval will be granted by the State Highway Engineer's Office on a
temporary basis. Mr. Benedict requested better shuttle bus service to
the west end of the Lions Head parking lot. Mayor Dobson replied that
the Town will provide a bus stop at a point near Antlers on the road to
the Continental Terminal.
A member of the audience asked why the area near the Crossroad Shopping
Center will nd: be pedestrianized this winter. Mr. Minger replied that
while he is in favor of pedestrianizing this area, complete details have
not yet been worked out. Mr. Staufer suggested that the area be used
as a pedestrian area on a temporary basis and changed to permit vehicular
use during a snow storm.
A proposal was brought before the Council with regard to the use of Vail
facilities again next summer by the Rocky Mountain Soccer Camp. The
Council gave its unanimous approval to the proposal, with Councilman
Donovan's comment that it is a very worthwhile project and was well-
handled this previous summer.
Mr. Ben Frank commented on the 'Golden Eagle' Bus Service and
recommended that there be an employee weekly ticket voucher to en-
courage bus usage.
Mayor Dobson reported that he and Mr. Minger had a meeting with Mr.
Bill Brazeal and John Malone of CATV. The T.V. franchise will be made
available to other companies with the condition that a new franchise would
commence after the purchase. Several cable systems have shown interest
in the franchise. Mr. Minger commented that the service will improve and
be provided at a lower cost.
Mr. Donovan queried the delay in presenting the monthly voucher lists.
Mr. Bernstein replied that there will not be a time lag with future voucher
lists.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Rosalie Jeff e Q
Town Clerk
•
December 4, 1973
Page 5
Local Liquor Licensing Authority
The Council then convened as the local Liquor licensing authority to
consider a request for permission to expand the premises of the Red
Lion Inn, Inc. Mr. Langmaid moved to approve the addition; Mr.
White seconded the motion; Messrs. Donovan, StauPer, Klug, Dobson,
Steinberg, Langmaid and White voted in favor; the motion carried and
the request was granted.
The Authority then considered a request for a change of partnership
from The Wine and Liquor Shop at Crossroads, from Harald Westbye
to Westbye--Hickox, a partnership. Mr. Donovan moved that the change
of partnership be approved, Mr. Steinberg seconded the motion; all
members voted in favor; the motion carried and the request was granted.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10;40 P.M.
?X"
Rosalie Jeffre J
Town Clerk
6
MINUTES
JOINT MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION/TOWN COUNCIL
DECEMBER 6, 1973
The Town Council of the Town of Vail and the Planning Commission. met
in a work session on Thursday, December 6, 1973, at 1:00 p. m.
The following council members were present:
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
John A. Dobson
John F. Donovan
Gerry White
Kathy K lug
Also present were:
Gordon Pierce Terry Minger
Jen Wright Diana Toughill
Merv Lapin
Bill Hanlon
Dave Sage
Jack Fritzlen
Parking Variance --- Dr. Peter A. Wells
The Town Council reversed the parking variance decision of the
Planning Commission and granted an exemption. Dr. Wells is required
to purchase one parking space for the amount of $3,000, payable at a
rate of $1,000 per year and bearing interest at 8%. The motion was
made by Councilman White and seconded by Councilman Staufer; all
members voted in favor; the motion carried and the exemption was granted.
Parking Variance -- Lionsquare
Representatives of Lionsquare Condominiums presented an alternative
proposal in their request for a parking variance. The Planning Commission
recommended that the proposal go back through normal channels since it
was a variation on the previous proposal.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2.15 p. m.
-(J?-
Rosalie Jeffrey
Town Clerk
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL
DECEMBER 18, 1973
The regular meeting of the Town Council for the Town of Vail
was convened at 7:30 P.M., December 18, 1973, in the Council
Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor Pro Tem Gerry White and the following councilmembers were
present:
Josef Staufer
Kathy Klug
Tom Steinberg
Joseph Langmaid
Also present were:
Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
Gene A. Smith, Town Attorney
The Town Council first convened as the Local. Liquor Licensing
Authority to consider the re-submitted application of Daniel
Ellis O'Brien for a 3.2% beer license. Witnesses were then
sworn in by the Town Manager. Mr. Douglas McLaughlin, attorney
for Mr. O'Brien, called the applicant to the stand. Mr.
McLaughlin then presented petitions to the Council to verify
the needs of the neighborhood requirement for the approval
of the license. Mr. O'Brien testified that he owns a Dairy
Depot in Breckenridge with a liquor license and has much
experience in the grocery business. He commented that the
good location of the store and the high rate of growth of the
Town of Vail are important factors contributing to the need
for another 3.2% beer license. Councilman Donovan asked Mr.
O'Brien whether he was familiar with the Keg and The Deli
and the fact that they cover the legal 3.2% sales hours in
the Town. He then asked why Mr. O'Brien did not have legal
counsel at the initial public hearing. Mr. O'Brien replied
that Colorado Liquor Code required neither legal counsel nor
petitions.
Mr. James Rogers testified that in his opinion the operation
is necessary for the convenience of both residents and visitors
of Vail. Councilman Donovan asked him when he had last pur-
chased 3.2% beer. Mr. Rogers replied, "Sometime last summer"
and added that he noted a significant growth in the Town of
Vail in the past few years, and that the service in the Village
Market is very slow.
Mr. Steve Ruder, owner of the Keg, commented that 3.2 beer is
mainly catered to the 18 to 21 year old and asked Mr. Rogers
whether he had ever tried to purchase it in the Town of Vail
and not been able to get it. Mr. Rogers answered affirmatively.
Mr. Harlan Choate, whose real. estate office is located in Room
45 of the Vail Village Inn, next to the Dairy Depot, testified
that due to crowds in the Deli he has been unable to be served
promptly. When questioned as to the amount of 3.2 beer he had
purchased recently he replied that he had bought two cases and
that he has a teenage son. Due to his late arrival, Mr. John
Buxman was then sworn in. He testified that his store, The
Village Market, is located in the same block as the Dairy Depot,
and that in his opinion there is not a sufficient need for
another 3.2 beer outlet. Although he was represented by legal
counsel at the initial hearing, he does not have a lawyer now
due to the expense - $388.00 in legal fees represent 3 months'
profits on 3.2 beer sales. He stated that he is open every day
of the year, from 7 AM to 11 PM on holidays and from 9 AM to
9 PM off season. S?:Jenty-five per cent of his business is from
within the valley and 25% is visitor. According to Mr. Buxman,
December 18, 1973
Page 2
there are plans for a 3.2 beer outlet in the Bighorn area.
Mr. Ruder asked that the petitions against the application
be reinstated as evidence. He said that he received his first
license in 1966 and was well-informed regarding the requirements
of the Colorado liquor laws. He noted that he has parking
approximately 300 feet from his establishment; his opinion is
that there is adequate parking for both his business and The
Village Market. Mr. Ruder's sales at the Keg are both 'on-
premises' and 'off-premises'. Statistics from the State of
Colorado show that 70-75 per cent of the 342 beer purchased is
by 18 - 21 year olds. The public's purpose in going to a
grocery store is not to purchase 3.2 beer but it would be picked
up there due to the convenience. Mr. McLaughlin stated in closing
that the tax assessments in the Town of Vail show the need and
asked that the Council take notice of the last 3.2 license granted
in the Town. He requested that Mr. Donovan be excluded from the
vote and that his questions were biased. Mr. Buxman's initial
testimony is to be incorporated into this hearing's testimony.
Mr. McLaughlin asked the Council to deliberate upon the dif-
ference between reasonable requirements of the neighborhood
versus the desire not to have another 3.2 outlet. Mr. Minger
stated that the petitions are numbered A through E. Councilman
White commented that the Board has 30 days in which to decade
on the granting of the license request.
Next to be considered was the application from Grand Prix, Inc
.
for a beer, wine and liquor license in the Tivoli Lodge.
Robert Lazier, Ernst Larese, James Rogers and Paul Ulrich
were sworn in to testify for the application. Mr. Larese
testified that he has been employed by Mr. Lazier since August 20,
1973, and the purpose of this request is to be able to provide
a service to the house guests of the Tivoli. The seating
capacity for the Grand Prix Room in the Tivoli would be 23
people. The Grand Prix would be open from 7 to 10 AM and from
4 to 12 PM. Councilman Donovan asked if Mr. Larese were aware
of the number of establishments situated within a 1/4 mile
distance from the Tivoli or even to the Crossroads Shopping
Center. Mr. Larese said he thought there were about 15 to 20.
Mr. Lazier then testified that he has built a number of estab-
lishments in the Town of Vail over the past several years. He
re-emphasized the need to satisfy the guests and noted that most
of the guests are family-oriented. In answer to a question-.-
regarding parking, Mr. McLaughlin stated that the Tivoli Lodge
has more than adequate parking. Mr. Lazier commented that of
the five lodges around his own, the Tivoli would be the only
one with food facilities.
Mr. Ulrich then testified as to the needs of the neighborhood
requirement with regard to this facility.
Mr. James Rogers then testified that in his opinion any lodge
owner who wanted to put in a food facility should be allowed to
do so as this would be in keeping with the idea of what a lodge
is - as a feature of the lodge and for the benefit of their
guests.
Mayor Pro Tem White then stated that the Board has 30 days to
make the decision in this matter and will notify the applicant
in writing.
As there was no further business, the Liquor Licensing Authority
adjourned at 9:20 PM.
•
December 18, 1973
Page 3
The Town Council then reconvened at 9:20 PM with Mayor
Pro Tem White presiding.
Ordinance No. 25, ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE: ADOPTING
A BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING SUMS OF MONEY TO DEFRAY EXPENSES
AND LIABILITIES OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, FOR THE TOWN'S
FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1974,AND ENDING ON THE LAST
DAY OF DECEMBER, 1974, was introduced for second reading.
The title was read in full by the Mayor Pro Tem and the audience
advised that copies of the ordinance were available. Mr. Minger
read from the Home Rule Charter regarding the adoption of the
yearly budget. He commented on the potential problem if the
budget were not adopted before the end of the year. He noted
that due to the climate of the economy there will be no more per-
sonnel hired for the Town of Vail until such time as the state,
regional and local economy is satisfactory. Mr. Bernstein
noted the impact of the energy crisis and the concern of the
people regarding the $70,000.00 amount budgeted for contingencies.
Such contingency items could easily be cut from the budget if
the funds are not available.
Mr. Bernstein also noted that no one is programmed to get the
5 per cent merit increase. Councilman Staufer stated that there
has never been a meeting between the first and second reading
of the budget. He is opposed to the "blanket 15% increase"
(i.e. cost of living and merit increases). He remarked that
his reasoning is not that the staff does not merit the raise,
but that they get a fair wage at the present time. He com-
mented that this would. give a 25 to 30% increase in payroll
over a two-year period. He did not feel that the VA payrolls
are good comparison and is totally opposed to the action.
Secondly, Councilman Staufer questioned the figures in the
budget and the various reports of actual expenditures for the
1973 Symposium. The amount budgeted was $10,000.00 and the
reports indicated $13,500.00 , with vouchers showing $17,000.00
to $18,00.0.00 other than payroll. He then recce=,uk,ended a 'no'
vote or a tabling of the budget. The Mayor Pro Tem noted that
while there were no meetings between the first and second
readings there was a meeting of the philosophy behind, the budget,
and he feels the Council knows the budget and is prepared to
vote on it. Mr. Minger responded to what he termed 'absurd
statements' made by Councilman Staufer. He noted that the VA
salaries were asked for by the Town Council and Aspen is offering
the town manager's salary of $32,000.00. He CvItU«ented that he
did not intend to dwell on salaries but rather on the integrity
of the budget.
Mr. Bernstein then commented that the relevant fact is how much
money the staff is being paid not the percentages. With re-
gard to Symposium expenditures, a Supplemental Appropriations
ordinance of $3,500.00 was passed by the Council to cover
additional amounts needed for Symposium expenses.
Each councilmember was then asked to comment on the budget
for 1974.
Councilman Donovan was in agreement with the philosophy of
the budget and the fact that the Town Manager does the hiring.
He is in favor of passing the budget.
Councilwoman Klug stated that the Council had adequate time
in her opinion to review the budget.
Councilman Steinberg c%.J„U„ented on the efficiency of the budget
being the issue to be considered along with the increase in
the payroll.
December 18, 1073
]gage 4
Regarding the Town Manager's and Town Attorney's salaries,
Mr. Bernstein has determined an amount on Councilman Langmaid's
request. Mr. Minger stated that he and the Town Attorney would
I be willing to stay at the same salaries as the previous year,
i.e. $26,000.00 and $24,000.00. He will make no change in the
payroll increases budgeted for his staff unless the council
directs him to do so. Mr. Elias asked if the increase would be
10% across the board or 25% for some. He questioned the nature
of the fringe benefits for the staff. Mr. Minger replied that
all full-time employees have the same benefits. He then re-
quested that the community state their goals for town govern-
ment and make them known to him.
A motion was then entertained for the adoption of the 1974
Budget for the Town of Vaal. Councilman Steinberg moved to
adopt Ordinance No. 25; Councilman Donovan seconded the motion;
Councilmembers Langmaid, Klug, Steinberg, Donovan and White
voted in favor; Councilman Staufer voted against the motion;
the motion carried and Ordinance No. 25, Serves of 1973, was
approved.
Ordinance No. 26, AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTROL OF DOGS, was
introduced by the Town Manager. The title was read in full
by the Mayor Pro Tem and the audience advised that copies
were available. Mr. Minger indicated that this need not be
an emergency ordinance, and explained that the thrust of the
ordinance is for a 'leash law' in CCI and CCII, these areas
were designated with the help of a map. Councilman Donovan.
commented that he is in 100 per cent agreement with the
ordinance but questioned Section 14 regarding "destruction of
dogs"; and asked whether that could be changed to read "to be
placed with the dumb friends' league". Councilman Steinberg
noted that the same dogs offend time after time with new owners
after being 'adopted'. Councilman Donovan said that they should
be placed outside of town limits.
Councilman Steinberg remarked on Section 11 and said that it
should be changed to a female dog "in heat". With regard to
Section 14C, regarding rabid dogs, ten days are needed medically
to determine whether it is rabid or not. The animal should not
be destroyed during that time. The dog should be impounded for
medical testing. In Section 15, it is the opinion of Councilman
Steinberg that mange is not in the same category as rabies and the
dog should not be destroyed. He would like that taken out of the
ordinance. He then offered the aid of the State Health Officer
for perusal of this ordinance. Technical changes to be made
would include, the addition of the words, "subsequent to the
registration period" in Section 7C. Councilman Steinberg
questioned whether under Section 22 concerning penalties, fines
would be automatic. The attorney replied that the judge must
rule on the violations. Councilman Donovan commented that the
vaccination service to the public could be held again as had been.
done in the past at the Fire House each spring.
Mr. Smith stated his reason for calling this an emergency ordin-
ance as being primarily due to the inconsistencies in the present
ordinance and the need for such inconsistencies to be corrected.
The major change is the leash law in CCI and CCII. Councilman
Steinberg questioned the pedestrianization of other areas of the
village and the possible need for this leash law to cover greater
portions of the town. Mr. Minger remarked that the controversial
matter of the dog ordinance requires its being put before the
public. A member of the audience cuA_,:ented that the problem of
the increasing dog population is more important than the leash
law, and that the public will be forced to break the law. The
second reading of this ordinance will take place on January 8th.
The word 'emergency' will be stricken from the title. Mr. James
Slevin pointed out that the Home Rule Charter provides for the
retroactive nature of the ordinance.
December 18, 1973
Page 5
•
•
•
Councilman Donovan moved that the dog control ordinance be
passed on first reading for publication subject to additions
or changes just decided upon; Councilwoman Klug seconded the
motion; the vote was unanimous in favor of the motion and
the Town Clerk was instructed to have the ordinance published.
With regard to a request for a Conditional Use Permit for Dr.
Thomas Duncan at his Sandstone office, Ms. Diana Toughill,
Zoning Administrator for the Town of Vail, explained that
Dr. Duncan wants to use existing office and storage space.
He meets all the requirements presently needed. In the event
he wants to enlarge the space, more parking would be required.
The Planning CQAULlission has recommended approval of the permit.
Councilman Steinberg questioned whether x-ray equipment would
be installed. The actual design of the office was not shown.
Mr. Dudley Abbott felt it was unnecessary to request a Conditional
Use Permit since he said he had made an agreement with the Town
when he owned the property which had determined the use at that
time. Councilman Steinberg then requested that the matter be
deferred until Dr. Duncan could be present. Councilman Donovan
moved that the request for a Conditional Use Permit be granted
with the condition that x-ray equipment not be used or that the
Dr. must determine if the building meets requirements of state
statutes. Councilman Langmaid seconded the motion; all council-
members voted in favor and the motion carried.
With regard to a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
counterweight cover for Lift No. 8, Mr. Fred Otto, legal
counsel for Vail Associ.ates,stated that the request is being
made for safety and aesthetics. The Planning Commission
has recommended approval of the request on the condition that
the color be matched with existing colors of the mountain
equipment. Councilman Donovan moved that the Conditional. Use
Permit be allowed; Councilman Staufer seconded the motion;
councilmembers voted unanimously in favor of granting the
request and the motion carried.
Regarding a request by U.E.G., Inc. for a Conditional Use
Permit for a Family Entertainment Center in CCII, Kent Rose,
the town engineer, explained that the establishment would be a
family game room to be located in.the Vail 21 Building under
the General Store. It meets all building and zoning require-
ments. The Planning Commission has recommended approval.
Councilman Donovan moved that the Conditional Use Permit be
granted to U.E.G., Inc.; Councilman Steinberg seconded the
motion; councilmembers voted unanimously in favor of granting
the request and the motion carried.
Concerning a parking request for Lionsquare Lodge, Mr. Warren
Klug, manager of the lodge, asked if there might be a possibility
of allowing the area in question to remain as green space until
at some future date it might be determined that additional park-
ing were required, at the sacrifice of the green space. Mr.
Merv Lapin, a member of the Planning Commission, commented that
he is not in favor of granting parking variances, since it will
have serious implications on future requests and building of
more meeting space. Mr. Minger commented that he has qualms
with the precedent this would set and is of the opinion that the
problem should not be handled on an individual basis. It cannot
be handled administratively and enforced by the staff. Mr. Klug
remarked that the area around the lodge would be adversely
affected if the green space were taken out. Councilmen Donovan
and Langmaid commented that the landscaping is more important
than the parking spaces, subject to conditions of the Planning
Commission memorandum.
r'
u
December 18, 1973.
Page 6
Mr. Elias questioned the granting of the variance at this
time due to the policy,statement of the Council regarding
parking variances. Mr. Elias is of the opinion that the
zoning ordinance is inadequate for the needs of the lodges.
Councilman White asked the Planning Commission to address
itself to the question and submit a decision to council by
the last day in February. Mr. Klug suggested that the ordinance
requirements.for parking be reduced. Councilman White stated
that Lionsquare must comply with present parking requirements
within eight months; if the zoning ordinance is changed, then
Lionsquare would not be required to construct the spaces.
Discussion followed, with Mr. Klug asking for a decision at
this meeting. Mr. Rose C%.41i«ented that no building could be
done until at least April 15, and that the decision should be
dependent on the parking required at that time.
Councilman Steinberg moved to reject the parking variance
request and require the spaces to be constructed if there is
no change in the zoning ordinance by April 15. The building
permit could be issued in the spring contingent on the parking
requirement. Mr. Klug then requested that the permit be
issued in the spring but that the spaces be put in by November
15, with a hearing on the matter to be held in the fall.
Councilman Steinberg's motion was then amended to read
November 1st instead of April 15; Councilman Donovan seconded
the motion; councilmembers voted in favor and the motion
carried.
Mr. Rod Slifer, representing the Vail Metropolitan Recreation
District, was present to request that a bond election take
place early in 1974 for the purpose of obtaining funds to
expand the golf course clubhouse, and to build 16 tennis
courts, 8 on Antholz and 8 at Lionshead, during the summer
of 1974. Mr. Slifer stated that he is optimistic in making
some arrangement with the Town regarding the use of the land.
Mr. Minger commented that the Town has worked with the Royston
firm regarding use of the Antholz for tennis courts, tot lots
and a pro shop. Mr. Slifer noted that the cost of the courts
would be approximately $200,000.00. The courts should be
ready by July 1, 1974. Councilman White commented that the
additional courts and golf facilities would help to make Vail
a summer destination point for tourists. Mr. Slifer then
requested authorization from the Town Council that the site
on the Antholz be given to the Recreation District for the
purpose of constructing 8 courts. Both Councilman. Donovan and
Councilman Staufer commented on the importance of public ex-
posure to the decision of how to use the Antholz property.
Other councilmembers were in agreement. A community question-
haire is being prepared regarding recreational needs and desires
of the citizens of Vail,; it will be made available to the public
about January 7th.
REPORTS FROM THE TOWN MANAGER
Mr. Minger commented that Keith Caroselli, of the Vail Factory,
had approached him about the sign ordinance of the Town of Vail.
Mr. Caroselli is opposed to some of the provisions of the ordi-
nance because he feels they are not functional or practical.
He would recommend that the ordinance be handled in an adminis-
trative manner instead of being handled by a board, since it
take such a long time to have a sign presented to the board.
He asked that the sign ordinance be made more workable. He
remarked that in his opinion the sign administrator has too
much power and that some members of the Design Review Board do
not know the ordinance. Lou Parker, representing the Design
Review Board, stated that all of the requests for variances from
the Vail Factory were with regard to size, not aesthetics.
Councilman Donovan rec%wimatended that since the matter is a tech-
nical one, it should be reviewed by the staff. He also noted
that proposals should be presented before the board within one
month of application.
December 18, 1973
Page 7
Mr. Minger read a proposal by the CU Design Students to
work with the town in planning the use of the Antholz Property.
Cost to the town would be approximately $1500.00. Councilman
Donovan made a motion that the CU students work with the town
in this design project; Councilman Staufer seconded the motion;
all councilmembers voted in favor and the motion carried.
Mr. James Slevin, of the Vail Institute, addressed the Council
with a request to use a portion of the Antholz property during
the summer of 1974 for a tent to perform and hold programs for
the community. Ultimately,.the goal of the Vail Institute is
to have a home: The Center for the Performing Arts. The
Council unanimously approved Mr. Slevin's proposal.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Mr. Robert Buterbaugh questioned the development of Tracts A
and B and the percentage of employee housing which might be
available to local residents.
Due to the construction of the Transportation Center, Mr.
Buterbaugh asked if the bus route could be extended to Booth
Creek and Sandstone. Mr: Minger commented that the staff is
now working with Vail Associates on a revised bus schedule
and route for the summer months.
Regarding Lionshead, Mr. Buterbaugh asked if the hours would
be extended for the people who will have to park in Lionshead
due to the construction in the main parking lot. Mr. Minger
replied that this problem is also being reviewed.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 12:30 PM.
•
l?
0
a
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VAI L
JANUARY 16, 1973
1. Consideration of Ordinance No. 1 (Series of 1973); AN ORDINANCE
ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, THE SAME
BEING LOCATED WITHIN VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH FILING, WITHIN
THE TOWN OF VAIL.
2. Consideration of Ordinance No. 2 (Series of 1973); AN ORDINANCE
PROVIDING FOR THE REVIEW OF A LL APPLICATIONS FOR BUI LDING
PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL.
3. Consideration of minutes of meetings of December 19 and December 26,
1972.
4. Reports from the Town Manager.
5. Information Center Report.
6. Presentation by Andre DeLucinges regarding employee relations.
Convene in joint session with the Board of Directors of the Vail Metropolitan
•
Recreation District.
1 . Discussion of golf and tennis rates for 1973.
2. Discussion of restaurant operation in golf clubhouse for 1973.
3. Consideration of resignation of Jerry Muth From the Board of Directors.
0i
t v Mo`~??
7015 WEST 37TH AVENUE + WHEAT RIDGE, COLO. 80033 *OFFICE: 986-1559
R ES : 424-0606
r?
E -__--
'R G
?C
December 18, 1-/72
Mr. Terrell J. Minger
T o wn Manager
Dox 100
Vail, Co 81657
Dear Mr. Flinger:
The dates of the Rocky I.Iountain soccer Carp ire:
July 8 - 13 _Lnd July' 15 - 20, 1 have completed all
housing ?xrangei,ient., with Idr. Claude Martin of the
Short Swing and all eutting cxrangements v>ith M r.
Staufer of the Veil Village Inn.
Near to the opening of cl?Lmp I will be in Veil
to m,.Lke uny final arr,??ngeYents> with you.
1 thUnk you and the town council for your support
and interest in soccer.
Sincerely your
Artie W;Achter
Camp Director
aW
•
W r?i Cr
?l1 Q •
' O
r? 9? CJ b
cSz
r
0 CD
? w
f
co -
W - c -3 ?
..s Wj CD N V?
#^'
OD ia
W ~ K W N C!
.,3 '2,
co 0 t-) v-3
N J N ON co
N X
"-.. W a U
O N •• 01 *3' Nq *d
1-3
¢*3
00 `- 'o
' cS> Oti .1 . O *d
tv. 0
r3 f...+
j3 W N d
ro
co
ON O ' ty a Y
rs
v? .a
0 ro N W W a
? C!Y
N Ls co N V-3
ON
ul
+ N mo w, Cd
VI N Il~?' N ? W t?t?
J j.. W tt?"
P.
Ul
.? _-_s. a tTt t4
co a
W r1 s o r, cP
CO `. cn J
0 w
r-j
ON N W ?",, o cSt
W Ln ON ?'
N N
W ? V?w .P 4^a'
i1w of Val
box 100 . vail, colorado 81657
INFORMATION CENTER REPORT
January 3, 1973
3 0 3. 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
Many visitors come to the Information Center in the
morning and late afternoon. The slowest period is approximately
from 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. and again from 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m..
In the past Christmas holiday week about 85% asked for
accommodations. Many of them had no reservations, therefore they
had no place to stay over night since every place was booked up
from here to Aspen. Some people drove on to Denver in spite of
bad road conditions. With all the development which has taken
place in the past year, we still can not accommodate all of
the visitors who flock into Vail at this time.
Basically, the most frequently asked questions are
about accommodations, the mountain, and parking facilities.
Sometimes visitors come into the center inquiring about certain
locations of buildings. Most of the time I am directing people
to restaurants and shops, lodges or condotels, parking facilities,
and advising people to call the V.R.A. for accommodations.
There are alot of people with campers that ask if we
furnish electrical outlets at our camping parking lot. I
believe that Vail should furnish this facility for the conven-
ience of its visitors.
There has been an increasing dumber of middle-aged
people who would like to ride the gondola for scenery and
enjoyment. They inquire whether there is a place to relax and
eat on top, the cost of the ride, and which lift is higher.
My biggest difficulty is trying to help someone find
a friend who lives in Vail when he has no idea where the person
lives or works. Unfortunately, I do not know a great many of
people who live in this town and everyone who has moved here in
the past six months is not listed in the phone book.
According to the tally sheets from Checkpoint Charlie,
their most frequently asked questions are accommodations, parking
facilities, and directions.
¦
411W I ''8
b o x 1 0 0 • v a l I , co I o r a d o 8 1 6 5 7 • 3 0 3. 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
INFORMATION REPORT
January 16, 1973
Information Check-point
Center . .... Charlie's
Accommodations 240 1:17'
Parking and Directions 175 409
Mountain 98 53
Brochure Collectors 84 41
Recreational Activities
Other Than Skiing 19 12
Road Conditions 17 49
Town Offices 8 13
Post Office 47 36
Food and Beverage 23 174
Looking For Friends 18 15
Shops and Services 20 117
Looking For Jobs 11 9
Rundown on Everything 65 6
Where Pay Phone 24 22'
Transportation Information 8 128
Camper Parking 13 4
Police Information 14 2
Clinic/School/Church Info. 20 43
Aspen/Other Resort Info. "3 1
Where Real Estate Firms 5 2
Where Library 35 1
Forest Service 0 0
Babys itters 7 6
Car and Driver's License 8 1
Information
Want Maps of Town 75 115
Ski School 18
Weather 5
Report summarizes time period from December 6th, 1972 to
January 15, 1973.
f
??`r`rJ?q 1 ! d
'p[R?Sr3'K rY'°ryf1 E`
b o x S o o o v a i i, C 0 1 0 a d o 8 1 6 5 7 ® 3 0 3 • 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
January 16, 1973
This report has been prepared in response to questions which
have been directed to the City Manager concerning the operation
of helicopters within or near the Town of Vail.
(1) An arrangement has been agreed upon by the
Vail. Associates and Helicopters Unlimited
to provide certain types of helicopter
service to the Vail area, The major points
of said agreement are as follows:
(a) Overnight helicopter storage privileges
in the Vail Associates maintenance shop.
(b) Display space and landing area provided
by the Vail Associates for a helicopter,
(c) Helicopters Unlimited, Inc, agrees to
use a landing approach that will cause
a minimum of disturbance and noise. It
also agrees to maintain its own insurance.
(d) A phone answering service to be provided
by Vail Associates for Helicopters
Unlimited.
(e) In regards to the agreement between Vail
Associates and Helicopters Unlimited,
said agreement can be terminated by either
party effective upon 10 days notice to the
other party.
Persons responsible for the agreement are Don Almond
of Vail Associates and Lenn Kasdorf of Helicopters
Unlimited.
(2) The following is a brief description of Helicopters
Unlimited.
(a) Mr. Lenn G. Kasdorf - President
-z-
(b) Denver based operation from Stapleton Inter-
national Airport.
(c) The organization has a PUC permit to provide
service as a general carrier.
(d) The organization has a total of six (6)
helicopters and five (5) fixed winged
aircrafts.
(e) The organization has a FAA license to
provide air taxi service.
(f) The helicopter operating out of Vail is
known as a Jet Ranger which is suitable
for high altitude operation.
(3) Contact was made with the Federal Aviation Administra-
tion concerning that agency's rules and regulations
.covering helicopter operation. The following are
points raised in the ensuing discussion.
(a) That the FAA has not approved what they term a
'designated landing site' for helicopters in
the Vail area. This site must be approved by
the FAA if the frequency of flights is to be
on a permanent or semi-permanent basis.
(b) That mu;ricipal governments have in the past
regulated such air traffic through ordinances
of various types.
(c) That if the Town of Vail wishes to seek
further action in regulating the operation
of helicopters within its boundaries, a
letter should be transmitted to the FAA
stating the nature of the problem. The FAA
will respond as to the appropriate method
of approaching the solution of such
problem.
In conclusion, Mr. Kasdorf of Helicopters Unlimited has indicated
his willingness to present to the Town Council any information
they would desire concerning the operation of his organization.
r ?
aQ cry
?
PA
I
b o x 1 0 o IF v a i I, co I o r a do 8 1 6 5 7 • 3 0 3 • 4 7 $- 6 6 1 3
VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
1973 PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULE
?J
A
GO LF=
Daily Green Fees/Per Person:
Beginning of Season - June 14;
September 15 - End of Season
June 15-September 14
Cart Rentals:
Season Passes:
Taxpayer to V. M. R. D.
Single
Husband & Wife
N on--Taxpaye r to V. M. R. D.
Single
Husband & Wife
9 Holes 18 Holes
$5.00 $7.00
$6.00 $9.00
$6.00 $9.00
$135.00
$216.00
$165.00
$265.00
After 4:00 p. m. - as much as you can play $4.00
Children, ages 10 through 15, may purchase season passes (w/pros'
approval) for $40.00.
Children under age 10 will not be allowed to play the course, and those
over 15 must pay the adult rate.
r, Z,
Co.
Li ?J
b o x 1 0 0 ® v a i l, c o I o r a d o 8 1 6 5 7 a 3 0 3, 4 7 6 5 6 1 3
VAI L METROPOLITAN RECREATION. DISTRICT
1973 PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULE
TENNIS
Hourly Rates/Per Court:
1 1/2 hrs. - $6.00
1 hr, -- $4.00
Season Passes:
Taxpayer to Non-Taxpayer'
V. M. R. D. to V. M. R. D.
Week-days Only (Single --
Excluding Holidays) $ 36.00 $ 45.00
Week-days Only (Husband &
Wife - Excluding Holidays) $ 63.00 $ 80.00
7--Day Pass (Single) $ 67.50 $ 85.00
7-Day Pass (Husband & Wife) $108,00 $130.00
Children under 15 may obtain a season tennis pass for $20.00 for
weekdays (excluding holidays) only.
•
r?,,v?w2sa??
box loo ® vaiI, coiorarlo 81657 e 303.476-5613
Dear Mr. Chairman;
Thank you for your interest in wishing to schedule a golf event
at the Vail Golf Club. This letter will serve to provide basic
information about our operation.
Vail is a beautiful, welt-manicured 7,000 yard championship
lay-out. The par 71 course is surrounded by towering mountains,
at an altitude of 8,200 feet and located 110 miles west of Denver.
The course is in its fourth year of operation.
Our facilities include driving range, putting green, snack and
cocktail bar, fully--equipped pro shop, and limited men's and
ladies' locker rooms.
A large cart fleet is available along with club rental sets and
hand carts.
The course is located within the Town of Vail and is only a short
distance from many fine lodges, restaurants, and meeting rooms
for groups such as yours.
We hope Vail will be your choice for this next summer season.
Please contact me if I can be. of assistance.
Yours truly,
Bob Wolfe
Golf Director
Vail Golf Club
0 Vail, Colorado 81657
'L SJ?.
S
?+ ra
y n
Ail
! n n'.
b o x l o o o v a i!, c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 5 7 * 3 0 3 • 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
GROUP'GOLF POLICIES
1 . Groups may not be scheduled on weekends and holidays.
2. A 50% deposit of the total green fee and cart amount is required upon
signing group for date.
3. Goff chairman of -the company must notify professional at least two
days before scheduled golf date if there is a players decrease, otherwise
company is liable for number signed up originally.
4. Beer carts are not allowed on course.
5. Please note our 1973 golf rates:
•? Eighteen Holes or more . . . . . . . $ 9.00
Nine Holes 6.00
Golf Cart (For two), Eighteen Holes . 9.00
Golf Cart (for two), Nine Holes 6.00
Rental I-land Carts Nine or Eighteen Holes . 1.00
Rental Clubs . .. . . 3.00
Range Balls, Small Pail . .75
Range Balls, Large Pail . 1.25
Club Storage . . 1 .00 per day or 3.00 per week
Lockers r . 1.00 per day or 3.00 per week
if you wish to secure a golf date for your group, please contact the following
people:
Summers (l\,1ay 15th - Sept. 15th)
Bob Wolfe, Professional
Vail Golf Club
P.O. Box 642
Vail, Colorado 81657
Phone: 303--476-5426
Winters (Sept. 16th - May 14th)
Ben Krueger
Vail Recreation District
P.O. Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Phone: 303-476-5613
1 -`? r F•
box 10o a vail, colorudo $1657 e 303.476-5613
GOLF GROUP SIGN UP SHEET
1. Name of company
2. Address
3. Date or dates you desire golf outing
4. Phone number
5. Golf chairman's name
W 6. Golf chairman's telephone
7. Number of players participating
8. Number of golf carts reserved
9. Eighteen Holes Nine Holes
10. Do you wish tournament? Yes No
11. Amount of deposit (50% of total G. F. & G. C.)
12. Green fees and carts charged to company or lodge?
13. Additional items you wish charged by your people?
14. Address while at Vail
OP Please send this form, completed, and deposit check to the following address:
Vail Metropolitan Recreation District
% Ben Krueger
P. 0. Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
To Members of Recreation District Board
0 which
Che enclosed are drafts of informational sheets w
will be sent to the VRA and all lodging entities. If they
meet with your approval, please indicate this fact to
Mr. Slifer. If they do not meet with your approval,
please indicate this fact also to Mr. Slifer. As soon
as possible.
:t Jam;
W
v
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1973
1. Discussion of the question: "Should the Bighorn Area
annex to the Town of Vail?"
2. Report by the committee on unauthorized parking on
private property.
3. Consideration of resignation of Dave Gorsuch from the
planning Commission.
4. Reports from the Town Manager:
a. Goals and Objectives of the Police Department.
b. Consideration of allocation of "Donations to
Organizations. "
0 c. Status of NASA Environmental Study Proposal.
5. Reports from the Town Attorney:
a. Pending Litigation.
6. Consideration of minutes of meetings of February 5
and February 6, 1973.
Executive Session.
•
1
TENTATIVE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE
VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT
GOAL #1: To develop close contact and understanding with the'
community and to establish confidence on the part of
the community in the service-oriented character of the
Police Department.
OBJECTIVES:
(1) Police officers should engage in frequent contacts
with tourists and members of the community.
(2) Police officers should make a special: effort to
contact the community of Minturn, especially those
individuals who are service officers in Vail.
(3) The Police Department should work on developing
a positive attitude toward the police by young
people.
(4) To encourage high-school age young people and
adult residents to ride along with officers and
become better acquainted with the Vail style of
policing.
GOAL #2: To develop police performance oriented toward solving
individual and community problems, and to broaden the
spectrum of problems being addressed by the police.
OBJECTIVES:
(1) To reach out to junior and senior high school
students to identify problems which can be solved
before they become police matters.
(2) To communicate to the adult residents of Vail that
the Police Department encourages them to bring
emotional and family crises to their attention
before they get out of control..
(3) To help people with problems which they encounter
on the street, such as a broken-down car or tourists
seeking information.
0 (4) To endeavor to leave each person contacted with a
positive attitude toward the Department.
GOAL #3: To work closely with other departments of city govern-
ment in the achievement of overall city goals.
OBJECTIVES:
(1) To engage in periodic communications with the
city manager and city department heads so as to
understand the changing goals and objectives of
the Town of Vail.
(2) To establish participatory management within the
Department and to work.with the Chief in the
formulation of Police Department goals.
(3) To engage in a two-day retreat annually for all
Police Department personnel so as to review the
degree to which the past year's goals and objec-
40 tives were accomplished and to set the goals and
objectives for the coming year.
(4) To become better acquainted with the changing
problems of the Town of Vail -- acting as the
eyes and ears of the Town government -- and to
participate with Town officials in solving
current problems and developing future plans
so that this information is fully utilized by
Town government.
(5) To look for opportunities to improve the performance
of Town government generally and of the Police
Department and, with the approval of the Chief,
to engage in special studies and projects where
an officer perceives a need.
GOAL #4: To maintain the quality of existing law enforcement
skills and to develop new law enforcement techniques.
Also, to encourage inter-departmental exchanges so that
Vail can learn from neighboring police departments.
-2-
i '
t ,F i P i
. GOAL #5: To encourage growth on the part of the officers and
to assist officers to maximize their career potential.
OBJECTIVES:
(1) To provide training consistent with the goals
and objectives of the Department.
(2) To develop career objectives for each officer
and to assess the officer's performance annually
based on objectives which the officer has per-
sonally developed.
(3) To provide opportunities for job rotation with
other areas of Town government so that the indi-
vidual can see how his-work fits in with the
overall picture.
(4) To build close communications among members of
the Department, between the officers and his
Chief, and between the Department and the Town
. government.
(5) To provide a-clear image of the Vail style of
policing to the outside world, so as to:
(a) attract new officers who are compatible
with this approach; and
(b) to encourage other communities to look to
Vail as a source of chiefs and management
personnel.
GOAL #6: To keep the organization as flat as possible and mini-
mize managerial and supervisory roles.
innovation and initiative
GOAL #7: To encourage diversity/among the officers of the
Department and to reward diversity. This means that
the Department will develop performance evaluation
approaches which do not tend to force the officers to
perform their duties in the same way.
box loo Vail, Colorado 81657 • 303+476.5613
February 20, 1973
Dr. Robert W. Pennak.
Department of Environmental Biology
University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Dear Dr. Pennak:
Per our telephone conversation, the Town of Vail is currently engaged
in an analysis of our water and sewerage treatment capacities and needs
in the Gore Valley in both the short and long term. The data from this
study will be used as a basis for an environmental impact statement and
policy for growth to be formulated by the city.
The institute of Arctic and Alpine Research at Colorado University is
presently working with us on the development of eight environmental
maps (Geology, Geomorphology, Soils, Vegetation, Hydrology, Climate,
Wildlife and Hazards). We hope to have a field team in Vail this summer
to collect data.
I envision your role as one of a consultant, particularly in the field of
limnology. Your imput will support and be of supplemental benefit to
the NASA team, but also bear the added responsibility of providing
technical assistance for our immediate projects of expansion of our
water and sewer facilities.
I'm looking forward to meeting with you on Saturday, March 3rd at
10:00 a. m. at the Vail Municipal Building. At that time we will discuss
our programs, fee structure, and time frame in detail.
Sincerely,
Terrell J. Minger
Town Manager
TJM:lh
10
=%?Wo *M0 log
0, GO-
Formerly: Eagle Piney
Water Protection Association
0
COLORADO RIVERS COUNCIL
P. O. BOX 1815 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-3055
February 9, 1973
The Honorable John M. Dobson
Mayor, Town of Vail
and Board of Trustees
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado
Gentlemen:
1 am interested in knowing whether the Board has
decided how to split up the $16,000 that is in the
Budget for "Donations to organizations".
I was planning on bringing this up in person at the
last Town meeting, but got hit by the "Vail Bug" and
I didn't think 1 would be able to sit still long
enough to ask anything.
Respectfully,
COLORADO RIVERS COUNCIL
Robert E. Gar Jr
Vice Presid t, Dir ctor
0 RE G/sw
VAIL OFFICE: DENVER OFFICE:
P. 0. BOX 129 4260 E, EVANS AVE.,
VAIL, COLO. 81657 DENVER, COLO. 80222
303/476-5940 303/758-2266
t - a
r
E
•
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
INSTITUTE OF ARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH
BOULDER. COLORADO 80302
Mr. Terrell J. Minger
Town Manager
Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Terry:
9 February 1973
Enclosed are the Tahoe Study reports on Limnology, Vegetation,
Recreation, Cultural and Historic Sites, Shore-Zone System, Housing
Study, Wastewater Collection and Treatment, Grading Ordinance, Land
Use Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and Shoreline Ordinance. Also
enclosed is a summary of INSTAAR's current research activities in
montane Colorado as well as a copy of a Progress Report to NASA written
last December and mailed in early January.
I am currently writing a renewal proposal to NASA which requests
that the level of funding for the second year of the NASA grant be
made equal to that of the first. The reason for this is that NASA
establishes a stepped scheme of funding for three year grants whereby
Year 2 has 2/3's the budget of Year 1 while Year 3 has 1/3 of that of
Year 1. In this way, NASA can continue or terminate programs by
granting or denying the renewal proposals. If a renewal proposal is
refused for Year 2, then the institution involved usually takes the
funds allocated for Year 3, adds them to Year 2 and terminates the pro-
gram at the end of the second year.
It is unlikely that we will be among the universities which NASA
intends to cut from the program. In fact, it has been hinted that
we are among the most productive groups. In any case, I wish to make
the Vail study discussed last December the nucleus of the renewal pro-
posal. I deliberately avoided mentioning details of a proposed study
at Vail in Progress Report 2. If you don't object I would lute to
describe our meeting of last December and list you as the person in
charge of the data user group, i.e. the person to whom the data, study
recommendations, etc, would be given. NASA insists that studies be
done for user groups who want, need, and intend to apply the data de-
rived from these studies. Mr. Claude D. Peters of the State Land Use
Commission was this person for the initial three-year grant and is
also the person named in this category for the ERTS-B Avalanche and
Landslide proposal mentioned in a previous letter. Incidentally, if
you are interested in examining a complete copy of the ERTS-B proposal,
one was sent to Ed Browning and Fred Trevey who are listed as Scien-
tific and Administrative advisors in that proposal.
Terrell J. Minger
9 February 1973
Page Two
Let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding
• the renewal- proposal.- • I'll send you' a copy when it, is, complete. '
• Sincerely yours,
?e 4 '?, -. - t, ?
Richard F. Madole
Remote Sensing Projects Coordinator
RM/ad
•
0
re?reat,'
0
?t
box 1 oo • vaiI, col ofado 81657 • 303. 476-561 3
BIGHORN ANINEXATION.FA.CT,SHEAT GENERAL SERVICES.
The following is a summary of major-services which' are
currently in full or limited availability to the Bighorn area.
Included in this report are the types of services provided by
the Town of Vail that would become available now or in the
future to the residents and property owners of Bighorn.
(1) Full Availability of Services
(a) Water: Supplied by two separate districts.
(b) Sewer: Supplied by Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation
District.
(c) Road Maintenance: Snow plowing and grading accom-
plished by Eagle County.
(d) Fire Protection: Furnished under contract with the
Vail Fire Protection District.
(e) Schools: Under the Administration of Eagle County
School District.
(f) Tax Collection: Accomplished by County Tax Assessor
office.
(g) Welfare Program: Administrated by County Welfare
office.
(h) Electrical Utilities: Supplied by Holy Cross Electric.
With no requirement for undergrounding of lines.
(i) Telephone Services: Supplied by tilountain States
Telephone Company. With no requirement for
undergrounding of lines.
(j) Solid Waste Disposal: Individual contract with Eagle
County Trash Company.
(k) Medical Care: Provided by Vail Clinic.
-2-
(2) Limited Availability
(a)
County Subdivision Regulation.:. Limited enforcement
due to lack of professional staff, by the County
Planning Commission'. '
Health -Service': •Wat.er atd. sewer .standards enforced
by pact-time County Sanitarian. •
(c) Building Control: The quality of construction is
enforced on a marginal basis by the State
Housing Authority on structures consisting of
two or more living units.
(d) Legal Services: One Assistant District Attorney
who handles the entire legal needs for Eagle
County.
(e) Law Enforcement: Limited patrolling by County
Sheriff Department.
(f) Planning Service: The County has hired a County
Planner who will create the County planning
program. Since the County has had no previous
planning program, the impact of the planner can
not be expected for some time in the future.
(3) Services and Benefits Available upon Annexation
(a) Police Protection: Pull 24 hour Police Department
with a staff of fourteen trained personnel
charged with the responsibility of maintaining
a quality level of public safety.
z.
(b) Maintenance of Streets and Roads: A fully equipped
7 man department responsible for snow removal,
street paving and repair, street lighting and a
variety of other related functions.
(c) Protective Inspection: The Building and Zoning
Department enforces all municipal zoning and
building codes through the issuance of permit,
plan checking and on-site inspection of all
construction within the Town of Vail. All
department staff members have extensive profes-
sional experience and are able to provide the
consumer and builder the added benefit of duality
control in design and construction.
-' -1
{d}
•
•
-3-
Administrative Services: A professionally oualified
staff administrates all functions of municipal
government within the Town of Vail and its
affiliated improvement districts. Of key
• importance are the following position's:
Town Manager
Financial AdmiIiistration
Legal Administration
Public Works Administration
Planning
Town Clerk
(e) Cable Television: All territory within the Town
boundaries must be served by the local cable
system which is franchised by the Town of Vail.
(f) Representation: Onced annexed, all qualified
residents have the right to vote in all munici-
pal elections as well as hold the variety of
elected or appointed offices, thus assuring
more immediate participation in the direction of
local government.
(g) Home Rule Community: The Town of Vail, as of
September, 1972, has been guided by the provision
of its new Home Rule Charter. The Charter
provides greater legislative and financial
flexibility thus enabling the Town Council to
guide the destiny of the community more precisely.
(h) Recreational Amenities: Upon annexation the new
territory will be able to participate in the
activities of the Recreation District. This
district coordinates the construction and opera-
tion of the community's recreational facilities
such as the golf course and tennis courts and
skating rink.
(i) Landscaping and Green Belt Program: The Town of Vail
through its intensive landscaping program insures
the continued improvement of the visual beauty
of the community. Under the Green Belt Program,
the Town administration actively seeks to
maintain ample open space to enhance the environ-
mental quality of the community.
(j) Environmental Control: The Town of Vail is contin-
uously seeking to maintain and improve the quality
-4-
0
of the community environment. To this end,
municipal government provides a variety of
control over future development through its
Planning Commission. The Sign Review Board
oversees the design and placement of.all signs
within the community. ?Iealth codes are enforced
by ,the Town. Sanitarian.. 'the Liquor' Licensing , .
Authority is responsible for insuring high
standards-of oneration of all liquor dispensing
establishments. The ultimate benefit of these
controls is to insure the property owner that
his investment in the community will be substan-
tially enhanced.
(k) Comprehensive Planning Program: The nature of Vail's
expansion in the past few years has prompted
municipal government to take a hard and critical
look at the future growth of the community. A
highly qualified planning team has been assembled
to analyze the present trends, problems and needs
of the community. The outcome of this analysis
will be a series of suggested alternatives which
will be used to guide the growth of the. Town.
Current studies that are underway include such
areas as: water resource study, recreation and
amenities study, traffic, parking and mass transit
planning, green belt and park plan, bicycle path
and hiking trail study, environmental impact
study, and landscape plan.
(1) Educational and Cultural Development: municipal govern-
ment is active in encouraging greater opportuni-
ties for its residents to develop and stimulate
their intellectual abilites. Such activities as
the Vail. Symposium, the Summer Vail Workshop,
public access television and the Vail Institute
and the Vail Library are all projects which the
Town of Vail is currently supporting with funds and
staff assistance.
0
POINTS TO 'BE CONSIDERED IN 'THE" 'BIGHORN ANNEXATION,
0 (1) Sales Tax.
The Town of Vail presently benefits from a substantial
sales tax revenue base, generated by the intense density of com-
mercial retail establishments. It should be noted that the
annexation of BigHorn will nearly double the present size of the
Town, which would have the following effect on sales tax revenues.
(a) The BigHorn area at this time has minimal
commercial-retail base. Consequently, the
Town of Vail's sales tax revenues will be
spread over a larger area.
However, financial projections indicate that BigHorn will be
financially self-sustaining in that municipal expenditures will
be in line with general tax revenues generated in the area (see
memorandum.concerning financial implication of BigHorn annexa-
tion to Town of Vail).
(2) Voting Population.
The annexation of BigHorn would add approximately
350 registered voters to the Town of Vail's voting population.
The potential exists for a shift in the voting trends of the
community.
(3) Growth Controls.
From the developer's perspective, the impact of annexa-
tion will, in most instances, directly affect development plans.
The Town of Vail is presently in the process of reassessing the
scope of its control over density, land use, architectural design,
parking, landscaping, amenities, transportation and other municipal
services. The developer should be aware of these impending changes
and be prepared to justify his project in more detail than has
been required in the past.
(4) Water and Sewer Management.
The Town of Vail must be prepared to assume the finan-
cial and management obligations of all water and sewer districts
within the annexed territory. This will allow for the consolida-
tion into one district, thus enabling unified management and
control. However, control in the past of these districts has
been under the supervision of development organization. Consolida-
tion could have an impact upon the developer's flexibility in
servicing a particular project. On the other hand, the Vail
Water and Sanitation District would have to assume an increased
financial obligation.
(5) Insurance Rates.
Upon annexation, insurance rates would be, in all
likelihood, lowered in BigHorn because a fire station would be
located in the area.
(6) Hbuszng.
At the present BigHorn supplies a substantial employee
housing inventory for the Town. It should be noted that zoning
and development controls could have an adversive impact upon this
type of housing stock. Development control could potentially
increase building costs so as to inflate rent or house payments
beyond the financial means of the typical employee.
(7) Annexation Time Schedule.
The annexation of BigHorn is by far the most complicated
annexation proceeding attempted to this point by a citizen group
and the-administrative staff of the Town of Vail. A four step
process must take place in order to complete the annexation pro-
cedure.
1. Petition must be prepared, circulated and signed
so as to determine whether a vote will be necessary.
2. Land use studies must be conducted to determine
the most suitable zoning configuration for the
territory.
3. Negotiation must take place between BigHorn
property owners and the Town of Vail to establish
zone districts.
-2-
4.''The'Town'Council,must ratify the annexation
• petition or annexation vote.
Inherent in this complex task is the need for detailed
study and negotiation, which will have an obvious impact upon the
time needed to actualize the annexation. Secondly, negotiation
cannot proceed between land owners and the Town until the Town's
new development ordinances have been adopted. Thirdly, the number
of property owners who must be contacted are extensive, thus
necessitating a greater time period. In general, the point must
be emphasized that this particular annexation cannot be accomplished
overnight and, in all likelihood, will take a period of four to
six months to conclude.
•
ot',? of ua i
box loo • Vail, Colorado 81857 • 303.478-5$13
. BIGHORN ANNEXATION FACT SHEET - FINANCIAL
1. Resident of Town of Vail nays 57.45 mi11•s--or $8..7•.45 pe'r
$1,000 of assessed valuation.
2. Resident of Bighorn pays 99.55 mills or $99.55 per $1,000
of assessed valuation (because of Upper Eagle Valley Sani-
tation District).
3. If annexation occurs, Bighorn residents will pay 9.40
additional mills (4.00 for Recreation District and 5.40
for Town of Vail); this will result in an average tax.
increase of $65/yr, per property taxpayer.
•
?I
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager 12/28/72
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
FROM: Stan Bernstein, Director of Finance
RE: Financial Implication of BigHorn Annexation to
Town of Vail
Year
1. Five Year Schedule of Projected Revenues
Projected Mill Tax Sales Misc.
Assessed Levy Revenue Tax Revenue
Valuation Produced Revenue Produced
............... Produced
1974 2.5 million 5.4 15,000 7,000 3,000
1975 3.2 million 5.4 17,000 9,000 4,000
1 4.0 million 5.4 24,000 12,000 5,000
1 5.0 million 5.4 30,000 14,500 6,000
19 6.0 million 5.4 36,000 17,000 7,000
Total
Revenue
25,000
30,000
41,000
50,500
60,000
2. Five Year Schedule of Projected Direct BigHorn Expenditures.
Public
Year Safety
1974 13,000
1975 15,000
1976 20,000
1977 20,000
1978 28,000
Public*
Works
15,000
18,000
24,000
33,500
35,000
Total
Expenditures
28,000
33,000
44,000
53,500
63,000
*Assumes the addition of 1 additional patrolman,
1 public works maintenance man, and necessary
vehicles and equipment.
r?
MEMORANDUM
TO: Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager 12/28/72
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
FROM: Stan Bernstein, Director of Finance
RE: Financial Implication of BigHorn Annexation
to Vail Metropolitan Recreation District
1. Five Year Schedule of Projected Revenues.
Projected Mill Tax
Year Assessed Levy Revenue
Valuation Produced
1974 2.5 million 4.0 10,000
1975 3.2 million 4.0 13,000
1976 4.0 million 4.0 16,000
1977 5.0 million 4.0 20,000
1978 6.0 million 4.0 24,000
2. The projected revenue (above) could service debt on a
$250,000-$300,000 bond issue.
0
MEMORANDUM
To: Terrell J. Minger Date: December 28, 1972
From: Lawrence B. Robinson
Subject: Annexation of the Bighorn Territory
" V'ai^ious residents *of the Bighorn area have recently expressed an interest
in annexing their property-to the Town of Vail. =There are various el?gibilcty•
requirements which diredtly affect any consideration of the annexation of
this territory or any other property to the corporate boundaries of the Town
of Vail.
The eligibility requirements are essentially as follows:
1 . one--sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be
annexed to the Town must be contiguous with existing Town
boundaries (this measurement excludes public streets,
waterways or streams);
2. there should be a community of interest existing
between the municipality and the territory proposed for
annexation;
3. more than half the adult residents of the area proposed
for annexation must be making use of municipal facilities
and services;
4. there should be no physical obstacles that make it
impractical to annex the territory proposed for annexation.
The Bighorn area, which is the subject of the contemplated annexation,
meets all of the.basic requirements for eligibility; however, the requirement
of the perimeter being contiguous to the boundaries of the Town will require
a series of annexations to ultimately include the most remote part of
Bighorn.
I would propose that a map be prepared to graphically demonstrate how many
parcels of land must be separately annexed in order to eventually embrace
the extremities of the Bighorn territory. Once we have determined the geo-
graphical segments, we can then determine what steps must be taken to
annex each parcel of land.
The Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 provides that if the landowners of
more than 50 percent of the territory to be annexed petition the municipality
for annexation and comply with the statutory requirements for same, the
Page 2
Memorandum to Terrell J. Minger
December 28, 1972
Town Council can determine through one or more public hearings that the
territory is eligible for annexation and annex said territory by ordinance.
If'the landowners of Tess than 50'percent of the territory propbsed to be
:annexed petition the municipality for annexation and 'meet cer'.tain'basic
r•equir^ements, an annex?Eion el.6ction may, be held to determine the que'stiori ;
of annexation.
Consequently, we should determine at the earliest possible date the descrip-
tion of each parcel of property eligible for annexation and program a series
of annexations, and, second, determine the wishes of the. landowners in each
parcel of property to more fully and intelligently evaluate what problems,
if any, we should anticipate in attaining our objectives. In making this
assessment, we can then more precisely advise the residents of this area
of what procedure to follow in completing the annexation procedures.
•
?J
.1
/ -
9 February 14, 1973
The Honorable John A. Dobson
Planning Commission
Vail, Colorado
To the Mayor and Trustees of the Town of Vail:
As a member of the Planning Commission for the past six years, I
have been honored to serve the town of Vail. If I have been able
to help in some small way to make the right decisions in order that
Vail may develop with some logic and benefit to all, then I am more
than satisfied.
I now find, however, that my schedule forthcoming in the spring has
become so heavy that I will have to cut down on my community activities.
I do not feel that I can serve at both county and town meetings and do
justice to the position for which I was appointed. Therefore, it is
with regret that I must offer my resignation.
At some future date, when time permits, I would like to serve the
community once again in some capacity. It has been an exceptional
experience to work with so many dedicated members of the area and I
wish you all well in future endeavors.
Re ectfu11y,
David Gorsuch
DG/jsm
cc: Robert Clark
i
•
tea!
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
MARCH 6, 1973
1 . [In joint session with the Boards of Directors of the Vail Water and
Sanitation District and the Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District.1
Presentation by the Ken R. White Company regarding the survey of
Vail area water and sewer systems.
2. Discussion of an ordinance providing for a developmental park and
recreation fee.
3. First reading of an ordinance regarding unauthorized parking on
private property.
4. First reading of an ordinance regarding garbage and rubbish.
5. Report on locally--originated TV programming.
6. Appointment of a new member to the Planning Commission.
7. Consideration of the minutes of the meetings of February 9 and
February 20, 1973.
8. Consideration of an agreement for architectural services on the
construction of a transportation center and parking structure.
9. Discussion of a transportation plan - Ginkelvan Day.
10. Acknowledgment of a letter from Rio Grande Industries.
1
r
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has been in the process of preparing
a new zoning ordinance and has scheduled public hearings on the proposed
zoning ordinance to begin on or about April 1, 1973; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council for the Town of Vail deems that it
is necessary and appropriate to temporarily suspend the processing of
applications for building permits pending the public.hearings pertaining
to the adoption of such zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council feels strongly that-the economic
integrity and environmental viability of the Town of Vail must be maintained;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council for the
Town of Vail shall not undertake the review procedure provided for in
Ordinance No. 2 (Series of 1973) for any applicants who do not initiate
such review on or before April 1, 1973. All applications for building permits
subject to such review, initiated on or before April 1, 1973, must be
completed within the period of thirty (30) days and the applicant will have
an additional period of thirty (30) days thereafter to complete and file
with the Building Department all plans and specifications required for
obtaining a building permit.
TOWN OF VAIL
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
Town Clerk
FACT SHEET: VAIL PUBLIC TELEVISION .1 `%O%W
0 (1) The purpose of Vail public television is to provide an electronic medium
to better inform the general public concerning local issues and events.
for
(2) The concept of VPT is that program?i+ng is prepared by Vail people (,,
Vail people. L+40 04 dot +G C? 0'
(3) Vail public television was initiated out of a study commissioned by the
the Town of Vail and carried out by the cable television study committee.
Members of the study committee included: Stan Hause, Nat Harris, Claudia
Pruitt, Steve Jones, Don Kline with the professional assistance of Dan
Hillaman from Colorado State University and Bob Sample from the City of
Boulder.
(4) The scope and potentual of VPT is outlined in a report prepared by the
cable television study cottmmitt e.
-4 e
(5) A volunteer group of seven people has been formed under the direction of
Mr. Don Kline to product a series of 12 hour programs to be presented
weekly on Sunday evening beginning March 11, 1973.
(6) Several members of the volunteer group have had extensive background in
television or radio production. These people are providing guidance for
the less experienced members of the group.
(7) Considerable cooperation has been received from local organizationsn
assisting in the produc 'on of VPT's first pr gram. ,
(8) A series of programs are being considered with the intent of informing
the Vail community of complex issues which are confronting the community
such asp transportation; police; zoning, and planning.
(9) Vail public television is using.on loan television and audio equipment
provided by the Town of Vail.
(10) At the present time, the Town of Vail television equipment is being used
to tape segments on location. All editing must be done in Leadville in
facilities temporarily provided by Colorado Mountain College.
(11) It is proposed that Vail public television be under the guidance of the
Vail Institute.
S
(12) Funding for the continued operation of VPT in anticipated to be provided
through grants from local business and government.
Is. (13) The future of VPT rests upon its ability to raise funds to provide for
necessary equipment and management cost. An adequate equipment inventory
could be acquired for approximately $9,000.00: At some point in the near
future, one part or full time staff member should be hired to coordinate
the multitude of details that is needed in television production. Finally,
minimal funds will be needed to be provided to cover production expenses.
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS
Janet Boyd (Submitted letter outlining interest and qualifications)
Bill Hanlon
Ted Kindel (Submitted letter of interest).
Mauri Nottingham (Has indicated that, if the Council views his membership
on the Board of Zoning, Appeals and Adjustments as a
negative factor rather than a positive one, would be willing
to resign from the Board of Zoning. . )
Bill Ruoff
Hans Weibel (Submitted letter of interest)
•
0
VAIL MUNICIPAL COURT
February 1973
DOCKET DEFENDANT CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
36 Tim A. Stone Illegal Parking - Pending
39 Thomas A. Simon Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 8.00
40 Patricia Marinello Illegal Parking - Pending
69 John Murphy Illegal Parking - Pending
71 Carl Schureestedt Illegal Parking - Pending
75 James A. Rosa Assault & Battery -- Dismissed
78 Danny Arguello Fine of $75.00 stayed to
March 7 , 1973
85 Jeffrey N. Houston Illegal Parking - Pending
97 Melanie Hyrnyk Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 8.00
108 Timothy Reuling Expired Safety Sticker -- Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
122 Dollie Shaw Parking in Fire Lane - Dismissed
126 Dan Livingston Illegal Parking - Dismissed
127 Lawrence Benway Illegal Parking - Not Guilty
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
138 Ronald Riley Illegal Parking - Guilty $11.00
Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty
140 Paul Clark, Jr. Illegal Parking - Pending
Failure to. Appear - Pending
141 Rudy M. Vigil Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty $40.00
142 Elvin C. Bland Indecent Exposure - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
143 Robin J. Gardner Larceny - Guilty $45.00
144 Hubert Karmeisool Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty $40.00
145 Francisco Gonzales Trespassing - Guilty $40.00
r
. r ?
DOCKET
147
148
149
150
DEFENDANT
Pamela A. Wedlake
David H. Hannah
David M. Coe
Terry Van Schwartz
151 Jennifer Kathol
152 Charles Alexander
153 Marie Koecher
154
155 Znge Wyatt
156 Parry McRae
157 Linda Rudd
158 Steven Szymanski
159 Peter T. Smith
160 Fred Simpson
161 Milledge Middleto
162 n
Charles Anderson
, Jr.
Erik L. Madsen
February 1973 - 2
I
CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
No Safety Inspection - Guilty $ 5.00
Speeding - Guilty $10.00
Speeding - Guilty $10.00
No Safety Inspection -- Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Speeding - Dismissed
Careless Driving - Pending
Special Hazards - Guilty $15.00
Parking in Fire Lane - Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty $11.00
Illegal Parking - Pending
Blocking Driveway - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 3.00
Receipts for February 1973 are included with this report. Also included
is $105.00, fine and court costs collected in the People vs.. William
Menter and held as appeal bond in Eagle County Court. The appeal was
dismissed.
The total amount is broken down as follows:
Traffic Fines: $61.00
Other Fines: $245.00
Court Costs: $45.00
TOTAL: $351.00
.M
Catherine L. Stone, Clerk
JAMES REAM AND ASSOCIATES INC ARCHITECTURE/ INDUSTRIAL DESIGN 243 KEARNY STREET 'SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 44108 (415) 989-2616
27 February 1973
0
Mr. Terrell J. Minger
Town of Vail
Box 631
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Terry:
I am enclosing with this letter our up-dated proposal for providing architectural services for
the design and construction of the new parking and transportation terminal facility to be con-
structed at Vail . This proposal is based on the major revisions to the previous design as dis-
cussed with you and the planners during the past few weeks. While we believe our original
design would have made an excellent facility, this new direction toward making the structure
virtually non-visable behind landscaped earth forms should fully satisfy any community con-
cerns about size or appearance.
It should be noted that the use of a subterranean scheme will increase project cost somewhat
due to the necessity of providing mechanical ventilation and fire sprinkler systems. I feel,
however, that this added cost will be considered a good investment by the Vail community
in terms of offering a very high degree of concealment of the parking structure. In addition,
operating costs will be somewhat reduced due to reducing the amount of snow removal re-
quired on the lower levels.
We and our consultants have estimated the amount of our previous work which we can util-
ize in developing this revised scheme. We conclude the following:
1 . While we will be unable to utilize any of the previous drawings prepared for the project,
there has been valuable knowledge accumulated on the problems to be solved and the design
parameters involved.
2. We estimate that we can reduce our fees for the parking structure schematic design by
50/c and on design development by 25%.
3. Since the projected scheme for the transportation terminal is different in both design and
location from the original proposal, we are essentially beginning again on this segment. How-
ever, we will credit 25% of schematic design to this portion of the work.due to familiarity
with its requirements. Note that this work had only proceeded through schematic design during
our. previous services.
4. Our structural engineers will reduce their fees by 20/a for the parking structure.
5.The research performed by our mechanical engineers on snow removal can be utilized dir-
ectly with adjustments made for the difference in quantities involved. The overall costs of
mechanical design will increase however with the addition of ventilation and sprinkler systems.
Mr. Terrell J. Minger
27 February 1973
Page 2
0
6. Allowing for the above credits our fee for the total parking structure through completion
of construction would be reduced from 4.85% of construction cost to 3.95% and on the
transportation terminal portion from 9.65% to 9.29%. The enclosed agreements reflect these
changes.
If this proposal meets with your approval, please have one copy signed and returned to this
office to serve as our agreement and, unless otherwise instructed, as our notification to
proceed with professional services. I have left the name of the Owner of the project and
the Owner's signature designation blank so that you may insert the proper legal title and the
name of the authorizing official or officials.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this proposal .
Very truly yours,
James Ream and Associates, Inc.
ames T. Ream, A.IQAo
enclosures:
Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect,
A.I.A. Form B131, April 1970 Edition, 2 copies
De??
•
•
LEAVELL DEVELORMENT COMPANY
A SUBSIDIARY OF RIO GRANDE INDUSTRIES, INC.
•
RALPH WR122EL4
VICE PR6%IOCNT
ONE PARK G1;NTRAL, SUITE 1250
1 5 1 8 ARAPAHO E S T R E E T
DENVER, COLORADO 60208
P. O. BOX 5482 (Zip 80217)
TELEPHONE 3 0 3/ 5 7 3- 8 8 715
February 28, 1973
?J
The Honorable, John A. Dobson, Mayor
Town of Va i I
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear John:
Enclosed is a plat of the Antholz property. We hereby decline your offer of January 8,
1973 to purchase the entire parcel and mare you the following counter offer:
We will sell to the Town of Vail all of Blocks 2, 4, and 5 (the areas marked in red) for
the sum of $2,400,000 cash, will convey to the Town of Vail for park purposes the 7.54
acres zoned agricultural (the area outlined in green) and will dedicate the roads (the
areas outlined in black) provided:
1 , The Town of Vail pays one-half of the cost of construction of the bridge
over Gore Creek on Manor Vail Drive, and
2. The Town of Vail rezones Lots 4 and 5 of Block 3 and Lot 4 of Block 1
as CC 11.
This counter offer will remain in effect for your acceptance through March 16, 1973, and
if accepted for an additional 90 days for a bond election .
We will await your reply.
R F/cn
enclosures
cc: Richard S. Kitchen, Sr.
John Amato
Charles Gersbach
Chris Al I ison
Yours very truly,
Ralph Frizzell
for Leavell-Manor Vail
Thoughts on the Conduct of Ginkelvan Day, March 28;
Prior to The Day, Ginkelvan will be on display at Covered Bridge Plaza.
Kiosk will display the background of the Ginkelvan.; the proposed
transportation plan; poster "The Automobile;" and ?????.
Person will be stationed at this location to answer questions,
point out items of interest and protect Ginkelvan.
On the Day at approximately 3:00 to 3:30 the Inaugural Ride will begin.
Dignitaries to number 18 will be picked up at points around the
Town and driven to the Lionshead bus terminal. A podium and
sound system should be set up at this location. A "Traditional"
dedication ceremony could then be conducted complete with
the breaking of a bottle of something (Ginkelvan property protected
at point of impact, of course.) Mayor Dobson and Mayor Lindsay
could then each make a short (5-10 minute) dick dedicatory
statement. Possibly xxxk music of some sort, properly festive.
Following this, several options are available. Something must
be done with the dignitaries who are gathered at Lionshead. They
could: 1 . just load back up on the bus and go wherever they feel
like going; 2. be given a tour of Lionshead by VA or something
along those lines; 3. go to a hot wine apres ski party in honor
of the Ginkelvan.
As farther explanation of the latter, it would seem appropriate
to make an aite.,,?x attempt to convince at least Fraiser's, but
possibly all who care to cooperate in the vicinity, to dkKbac declare
they apres ski to be in honor of the Ginkelvan that day; possibly
cut prices; possibly get something from a wine company and just
serve it free until it runs out.??????
On the evening of The Day, a cocktail buffet at Lionshead Terminal. Beginning
approximately 6:30. Speeches approximately 7:00 or 7:30. Entertainment
of a semi-rock folk singer. In order that all people of the Town will
feed free to come and yet insure that people will come, tickets might
possibly be sold, with an effort made by Mayor's Special Study Committee {?)
[r to assure that the "Correct" people are contacted to buy tickets. A certain
?fC number of tickets should be set apart j&fZx for this with the remainder on
a first-come, first-served basis.
Following this, as it is still early, if it were desired, a more "Select" affier
affair could be held. No mention has been made as to whether the
Mayor desires to preside over such an event, etc.
('6• C;A (fie ?A A-)
A,
FACT SHEE'T': VAIL PUBLIC TELEVISION .) %A?
(1) The purpose of Vail public television is to provide an electronic medium
to better inform the general public concerning local issues and events.
(2) The concept of VPT is that programing is prepared by Vail people for
Vail people. 4 + "?"3~
(3) Vail public television was initiated out of a study commissioned by the
the Town of Vail and carried out by the cable television study committee.
Members of the study committee included: Stan Hause, Nat Harris, Claudia
Pruitt, Steve Jones, Don Kline with the professional assistance of Dan
H illaman from Colorado State University and Bob Sample from the City of
Boulder.
(4) The scope and potentual of VPT is outlined in a report prepared by the
cable television study committ?e.
A {„: i e4 -
(5) A volunteer group of seven people has been formed under the direction of
Mr. Don Kline to product a series of ;i hour programs to be presented
weekly on Sunday evening beginning March 11, 1973.
(6) Several members of.the volunteer group have had extensive background in
television or radio production. These people are providing guidance for
the less experienced members of the group.
4.,
(7) Considerable cooperation has been received from local organizations in
assisting in the production of VPT's first program.
(S) A series of programs are being considered with the intent of informing
the Vail community of complex issues which are confronting the cam,-,Lznity
such as, transportation; police; zoning, and planning.
(9) Vail public television is using,on loan television and audio equipment
provided by the Town of Vail.
(10) At the present time, the Town of Vail television equipment is being used
to tape segments on location. All editing must be done in Leadville in
facilities temporarily provided by Colorado Mountain College.
(11) It is proposed that Vail public television be under the guidance of the
Vail Institute.
(12) Funding for the continued operation of VPT in anticipated to be provided
through grants from local business and government.
(13) The future of VPT rests upon its.ability to raise funds to provide for
necessary equipment and management cost. An adequate equipment inventory
could be acquired for approximately $9,000.00. At some point in the near
future, one part or full time staff member should be hired to coordinate
the multitude of details that is needed in television production. Finally,
.minimal funds will be needed to be provided to cover production expenses.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCI L OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
A PRI L 3.1 1973
1 . Second reading of Ordinance No. 6, an ordinance authorizing the
condemnation of certain real estate located within the Town of Vail.
2. Discussion of a request for the granting of a trash franchise.
3. Consideration of proposed new zoning concepts.'.
4. Consideration of a request for approval of a plat of Vail Village,
1Oth Filing.
5. Consideration of minutes of meetings of March 6, March 7, and
March 13, 1973.
6. Presentation of annual audit report for 1972. v',
Reports from the Town Manager
(a) Police Station Remodeling
(b) Status of the 5-B area
(c) Cable TV
Reports from the Town Attorney
(a) Pending Litigation
0
40W 10 !8
box 100 • vaiI, col orado 81657 • 303. 476-5613
April 3, 1973
TO: TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION
RE: VAIL VILLAGE IOTH FILING
The Planning Commission has reviewed the subject plat
and find that all requirements of the Subdivision
Regulations have been met.
We recommend that the Plat for Vail Village 10th Filing
be approved a5 submitted.
4D PL 1NN I NG MP S ION
J , M. Ievln
dt
iV
0
t
PETITION
We, the undersigned, residents, business owners,
and/or persons interested in the welfare of the Town of Vail,
by this petition express our concern over the need, desiMbi-
lity and the-fiscal responskbility of the Ginkelvans.
NAME
4.
??
5.
17.
r?
r
61-0"
18. '
19.
2a.
y
21.
2 2 ,
23.
Q/Vl
'2 4 .( ..b4 -rP -
25.
ADDRESS l
GEC -to -% vw; 1
` /67-7 /A12c /
VA
Zak-
l
0 U?.; x
r A,
?? x 3Sy, b? /G..
A
cs-tx- ? l ? I /`??r
ox -\)(I Q
&57 7,
0
16.
a±. `.f32??i IbC ?.
•
PETITION
We, the undersigned, residents, business owners,
•
•
and/or persons interested in the welfare of the Town of Vail,
1 - ' ?: -111, 1 V) , X. ?-"-?Lw V? '/ q (C' ? U.'- D ?'
by this petition express our concern over the need, desimabi--
lity and the fiscal responsMbility of the Ginkelvans.
,NAN ADDRESS
7 "VI
10
12. el V
s'
14.
15
1^67
17.
l9 ..
20.
21.
22.
23..
24.. . . ... ...
2.5 .
so
V
•
•
k
PETITION
We, the undersigned, residents,. business owners,
and/or persons interested in the welfare of the Town of Vail,
by this petition express our concern over the need, desirabi-
lity and the fiscal responsibility of the Ginkelvans.
NAME DDRESS
? A A,,_.? ?
111+lr
3 /? ?ppp L? fJ{/CJ?
5.
/ v
9 J.
13. UG?//
?` ?/2G ?? ?iOdGG? X&,e
? d
14... .
25.
mim
•
r 1
0
r
t
PETITION
We, the undersigned, residents, business owners,
and/or persons interested in the welfare of the Town of Vaal,
by this petition express our concern over the need, desirabi-
lity and the fiscal responsabil.ity of the Ginkelvans.
VAME ADDRESS
?r
q?'
3 .?? "
9 73
j?
9 Jam//// L _? ch ' 1 l
?-
e- ?a4
12.
13.
1.4.....
15. . . .
.
1G..
17.
19 ..
2'0 .
21.
?2
23.
24....
25.
__ -1
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
APRIL 17, 1973
Conine as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
1. Consideration of the request of Holly Vail to expand the licensed
premises.
Convene as the Town Council
1. Second reading of Ordinance No. 7 providing for the codification of
ord ina nces.
2. Consideration of preliminary zoning ordinance.
3. Consideration of proposed trash agreement.
4. Consideration of minutes of meetings of March 5 and March 20.
0 r .?
LJ
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
MAY 15, 1973
1. Consideration of requests for parking variances from Engelke Architects,
Rodney E. Slifer, Shareholders Recreation Programs, Inc., and F. Gaynor
Miller, J. Barry Telleen, and Stnaley R. Medsker.
2. Consideration of minutes of meetings of Apri l 3, Apri l 11 , and May 1 .
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
1. Consideration of a request for a special events permit from the Town of
Vai 1.
•
0
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JUNE 5, 1973
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
1. Consideration of application of Clifford Bruce Hartman for a beer,
wine and liquor license.
2. Consideration of application of Otto Stork, Inc. For a 3.2% Fermented
Malt Beverage License.
3. Consideration of application of Manor Vail Condominium Association
for an expansion of the premises into 1240 square feet of the existing
Conference Area.
4. Discussion of proposed reprimand for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation
District.
5. Discussion of status of Special Events Permit for the 7th and 8th of
June.
• Convene in Joint Session with the Planning Commission.
1. Consideration of a request from John L. Tyler, C. Gary Skartvedt,
Michael E. Judge, Trustee, and Julian O. Northcraft, Trustee, for the
replatting of Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing to the Town
of Vail.
Convene as the Town Council.
1. Consideration of requests for parking variances from (a) David L.
HoU Bann (Sunbird Lodge); (b) Dana C. Rickli (Landmark at Lionshead);
(c) Montan, Inc. (Vail International); and (d) Larry Burdick (Red Lion).
2. Consideration of a proposed resolution setting a public hearing for the
annexation of the territory commonly known as Vail Village, 11th Filing,
to the Town of Vail.
3. Discussion of proposal of A & D Enterprises, Inc. regarding rights to
the streets.
4. Discussion of remodeling of old Water and Sanitation Plant.
5. Acknowledgement of resignation of Robert Clark from Planning Commission.
6. Discussion of VRA request for $500 for Fourth of July fireworks.
Page 2
Agenda
June 5, 1973
7. Consideration of minutes of meetings of March 16, March 29, and
April 17, 1973.
8. Discussion of applicability of recreation fee to the Rich project.
•
CI
r-J
•
4
Mr. U, try ltubinwin
Town Attorney
Vasil, Cclarudr>
Lieu Mr. Rubimwn:
By virtue ut our mcotinkq last munrncr, you ere aware, of the f&ct that I represent
Pitxbttgh Sects and `:r. and ,''lm Jo&eph PJCh with rts'pect to their cond%mu=n, projec in
VaiL
! have in my pu&.veu. -h)n ,% copy ,5f Ordin4tic:, No. S. rigs of 1913, miaiinn to ft,
im,po itu:on nAd C-Affection J mcrL"nti nal iv purpo.iw in writing, in y--,u is to :?bt6n
some tact6 taut prim-arby to purist A* you th:.t ftes .houki not be c.uMded with respect to
1h.-,iucrh project.
It is my undersmrOing that pppiitatRm for a building pennit was filed with the
Town in Dcc mlxr, 1972. The built'Unp, Vzyrnit we wxa paid ,,, the T ,n in 'Feb -iry, 1973.
A budding pcrrmit was kiss,, d an Atari! 7, 1973. TN- permit Ren-'d the. 'imposition of
approxiw,;?,tely SI0, M) in recrvaWaal fees pu;rsu :nt to t? r yv f,rttimnre.
'rho nrdinancc wr-s introdtwtd,.ra-at, adopted and ordered published on Ntarch 20,
1473. The artlm*nce effect up6n "limst i iii-1, :". AIM t-h the tv.2 rds
ae not elit'v:trra dd inw, I prc-s nic that t31F':. a
publicahm wouw t", the r-tfective &It* of the ordin tno€ . 4, out4i you pleaw con &r what
period 1wvi, required ivr pubUc:ation and when that pertfs,d expsrQu.
J
V
sir. Larry R%-1bkfttm
.71
April ll. 1973
Next, could you picaw ccn ? the circumi t nces under. which the of
dw building permit was dekiyed. ifz vn the reasioas umiwd to axtc for del:-y, it *f ufd seem
as though wow stud k4 attompt wus made w, dciay kwAnw ref tine pennit utttil after "fin-al
of orjiwMcd Ko. 5.
Ileasc also covaidcr that the pen-nit fea w m acwpW by tht Town Lug before
A- vpd-art of the s,rdlm.noz.
FiaUiiy, pie€3SO WnsWcr tho p%)SAbiiity tfj# the .- entire gndinance is
nncunstitutic-ow , &spiw t : wit-serv* stawnwat of "public boAth, Mfety and w_=h'r ". I
"to that dw fec is nett eren cast in the form via deductible tact.
After y4ju have given Mew, paints wow vrnsiduadon, c.'ouid y(m ?.iudly call or
writo in resp?}nse to dth. iwer. We are, ccruinly not Wgcswd in paying duI we and i tbiwv..
the mutton should be rtsolved WI ore apphc:atioa ismzda for an -occupancy permit.
Veal teuty yours,
is
WFF.Pac
CC ; fix. And 'Mrz. IOU-.Ph lucb
;ter. pitrhu?h coil
qtr. Gardun Picrcc
WILLIA_14 FITZut' ]G I FOX
4
. APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE
THE TOWN COUNCIL AND/OR VAIL PLA14NING COMMISSION
App 1 i cation Date January 10, 1973
Hearing Date
I (We) David L. Hoffmann (representing HSW Associates) of
(ApplicanT
Hearing Fee
7777 Bonhomme
(Address)
0 Missouri Clayton 63105 Phone (314-862-6363)
(State) (City)
do hereby request permission to appear before the Town Council and/or Vall
Planning Commission to request the following:
{ ) Zoning Change from to
(xx) Parking Variance
( ) Conditional Use Permit to allow-
1 n Commercial Core II Zone.
For the following described property: Lot 2
Fi'I inq Number
Ordinance and Sections being appealed: Ordinance
, Block 1
, Series
of , Section(s)
Clearly state purpose and intent of this application Snowbird Lodge at Lionheadhas a
' parking level (enclosed) beneath the lodge. This request is to allow approximately z4 toot aisles in lieu c
00t and most oarkinci stalls approximately 18 feet in lieu of 19 feet. Because 80% of our parking' is en-
closed space and free from the problems of snow accumulation which uses up space, we feel a standard garage
-spgLjnr of 18 plus 24 aisle plus 18 feet for a total of approximately 60 feef is reasonable.
What do you feel is the basis for hardship in th i s case? The width of the site and the
subsequent 14 foot room width module above only allows approximately 42 feet in the garage below Ctrs toot
SkII rhLs__9__'_fo0t alslel- V}!p rQg1i7P this type of construction where the buildinci is over the garage is unusual
in Vail, but we feel there will be no parking problems because the enclosed, snow-free environment does not
reauire extra space for snow accumulation. '
ll!!11//ff/L
• Signaturd of Applicant
INSTRUCTIONS: David L. Hoffmann, AIA
Form-must be submitted in triplicate, and all copies must be signed.
41 A plat map drawn in triplicate to a scale of not less than 200 feet to
the inch showing the land in question, its location, the length and
direction of each boundary thereof, the location and existing use of
all buildings on such land and the principal use of all properties within
300 feet of such land. If the application is for a parking variance,
show parking provided, drawn to scale and numbered to indicate the
spaces.
3. The names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 300 feet
of any part of the land included in the proposed variance.
4. All information required by the Subdivision Regulations for preliminary
plats where applicable.
5. The Town Council and/or the Planning Commission will set a hearing
date not more than thirty (30) days from the request for zoning.change,
application for parking variance or conditional use permit.
6. "Jot "l es *'7 an `= r ;-een (I5) days prier to the date set for the hearing,
the gearing authority snail cause a copy of a notice of the time and
place of such hearing to be published once in a newspaper of general
circulation in the County of Eagle. All property owners in (3) above
shall be notified of said application and hearing.
APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE
• THE TOWN COUNCIL AND/OR VA I L PLANNING CQMIM i SS I ON
f
App l i cati cn Date,` I
Hearing Date Hearin Fee _
(We) of
?If Fti ?s l e!!'?
(App l i cant ?/ (Rcidre s) !"
y
Phone
(State) (City)
do hereby request; permission to appear before the Town Council and/or Vail
Planning Commission to request the following:
( } Zoning Change from to
{ Parking Variance
( ) Conditional Use Permit to allow
in Zone.
For the following described property: Lot Block 1!51 t=?
F i I i no Number 1r'f-.a b,. 1_,i??} .1 ??"t 1?ka 1 lr•lr?L?
Ordinance and Sections being appealed: Ordinance Series
of Section(s)
2rly state purpose and intent of this application
0
12-0 ' `...1-f- Pt.11'F-Li !L-)I--JF
What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this case;
fir,, ? ? j . ?? . / •4,•?" ; ??. ??.
Signature of Applicant
I Form must be submitted in triplicate, and all copies must be *signed.
A plat map drawn in triplicate to a scale of not'less than 200 feet to
the inch showing the land in question, its location, the lenath and
direction of each boundary thereof, the location and existing use of
all buildings on such land and the principal use of all properties within
300 feet of such land. If the application is for a parking variance,
show parking provided, drawn to scale and numbered to indicate the
spaces.
3. The names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 300 feet
of any part of the land included in the proposed variance.
4. All information required by the Subdivision Regulations for preliminary
plats where applicable.
5. The Town Council and/or the Planning Commission will set a hearing
date not more than thirty (30) days from the request for zoning change,
application for parking variance or conditional use Derrnit.
6. Not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the hearing,
the hearing authority shall cause a copy of a notice of the time and
p I ace of such hear i nc, to be ,pub I i she" -n cc i n a rie,::spaper of genera 1
circulation in the County of Earle. All property owners in (3) above
shall be notified of said application and hearing.
:¦
APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE
THE TOWN COUNCIL AND/OR VAIL PLANNING COMMISSION
..
App f i cat i on Date
Hearing Date Hearing Fee
V!Z ' t tJ 7? C°1' / y 2 ?? r cz /
ofN
(Applicant (Address)
O U" Phone
.?? .?
(State) (City)
do hereby request permission to appear before the Town Council and/or Vail
Planning Commission to re-quest the following:
( ) Zoning Change from to
Parking Variance
( ) Conditional Use Permit to allow
in
For the following described property: Lot,
Filinq Dumber
Ordinance and Sections being appealed: Ordinance
Zone.
, Block
of Section(s)
0arly state purpose and intent of this application -rb
PASMj4)W4:9-N 25V 5-4=
, Series
Z1 0 Ca
What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this case?
.
?
or-
o5ignature of Applicant
?RUCTIONS: -
Form must be submitted in triplicate, and all copies must be signed.
2. A plat map drawn in triplicate to a scale of not less than 200 feet to
the inch showing the land in question, its location, the length and
direction of each boundary thereof, the location and existing use of
all buildings on such land and the principal use of all properties within
300 feet of such land. If the application is for a parking variance,
show parking provided, drawn to scale and•numbered.to indicate the
spaces.
3. The names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 300 feet
of any part of the land included in the proposed variance.
4. All information required by the Subdivision Regulations for preliminary
plats where applicable.
5. The Town Council and/or the Planning Commission will set a hearing
date not more than thirty (30) days from the request for zoning change,
application for parking variance or conditional use permit.
6. Not Less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the hearing,
the hearing authority shall cause a copy of a notice of the time and
place of such hearing to be published once in a newspaper of general
circulation in the County of Eagle. Ali property owners i.n (3) above
shall be notified of said application and hearing.
t
t
APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE
THE TOWNiCOUNC I L AND/OR VA I L PLANNING COMM I SS I OtS
f
Application Date April 27, 1973
Nearing Cate '
i
I (JIZ) Mr. Larry Burdick of
ahl (Applicant
Hearing Fee
Jtam/
P.O. Box 155 m
(Address) -w
Colorado , Vail Phone 476-5740
(State)
do hereby request p
Planning Commission
( x)
(City)
ermission to appear before the Town.Counci
to request the following:.
Zoning Change from to
Parkina Variance
Conditional.Cse Permit to allow
in
For the following described property:
Filing Number First Filing
Ordinance and'Sections being appealed:
of
, Section(s)
Lot H & G
Ordinance
, Sdries
C*ly state purpose and intent of this application
To acquire a parking variance which would permit an addition to the existing
building which is presently well under the F.A.R.
What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this case? Present zoning
requirements for parking would require 30 car spaces on a Bridge Street
property which is nearly inexcessable and very undesireable for the village,
due to this zoning requirement an adclit n to e d g uld be impossible
? App I i cant
g n a t u{r e
t .
INcTIONS:
I. arm must be submitted in triplicate, and all copies must be signed.
2. A plat map drawn in triplicate to a scale of not less than 200 feet to
.the inch showing the land- in question, its location, the length and
direction of each boundary thereof, the location and existing use of
all buildings on such land and the principal use of all properties within
300 feet of such land. If the application is for a parking variance,
show parking provided, drawn to scale and numbered to indicate the
spaces.
3. The names and addresses of the owners of all properties within 300 feet
of any par; of the land included in the aroposed variance.
4. All information reeuired by the Subdivision Regulations for p;-elirninary
plats where araiicable.
5. The Town Council and/or the Planning Commission will set a.he'aring
date not more than thirty (30) days from the request for zoning chance,
application for oarkina variance or ccnditic^.al use perT.it.
5. Not !,?cs than r„n ( 15) 'da`,,s trio, the gale set or the hear i,
the hearing authority shall cause a copy of a no•.tice of the time andJ
place •of such hearing to be published once in a newspaper of general
circulation in the County of Eagle.. All property owners in (3) above
ill be notified of said application and hearing.
even though the finished project would be under the F.A.R. permitted.
4
Zone.
and/or Vail
, Block 5A
a
•
r
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JUNE 19, 1973
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
1. Hearing on application of Mary Joyce Senac for a Beer, Wine and
Liquor License.
2. Consideration of application of Vail-Eagle Valley Rotary Club for
a special events permit.
Convene as the Town Council
1. First reading of Ordinance No. S (Series of 1973); Town of Vail Zoning
Ordinance.
2. Consideration of an application of Booth Creek Associates for an
exception to the parking requirements of the Town of Vail zoning ordinance.
3. Discussion of claims by various parties to rights in the streets of the
Town of Vai 1.
4. Discussion of need to appoint members to the Town of Vail Election
Commission.
5. Consideration of minutes of April 19, April 24, and June 11-12, 1973.
6. Public hearing on proposed P.U.D. provision for the Sunburst at Vail
project.
Reports by the Town Manager.
a. Proposal from VRA Board of Directors "Community Affairs Committee"
b. Proposed remodeling of old sewer plant A--frame
t
VAIL RESORT ASSOCIATION • VAIL, COLORADO 81657
TO: TOWN OF VAIL TRUSTEES DATE: 6/18/73
FROM: VRA BOARD OF DIRECTORS "COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE"
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY PROJECTS
In the spirit of cooperative, community
improvement efforts, involving the TOWN OF VAIL
and the VAIL RESORT ASSOCIATION, the Community
Affairs Committee of the VRA Board of Directors
requests the consideration of the TOWN TRUSTEES
in a joint effort to accomplish the four priority
projects under Section I.
In addition, the committee solicits the TOWN
TRUSTEES consideration of the three special
projects proposed under.Section II.
Thank you for your assistance.
VRA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
Bob Parker
Don Chaplin
Hans Weibel
Dale McCall (Ex-officio)
•
RESERVATIONS & SERVICES 303-476-5677 / CONVENTION BUREAU 303-476.5005
S ECTION I
1. MAP OF VAIL:
A. One Color, "hand-out" map to be used for large quantity distribution to public.
B. 2-4 Color "souvenir" and "presentation" style map with art work and more
information and detail than the "A" style map.
The VRA has put approximately $1, 500.00 into the revised art work done by Ken White.
Company to up--date and expand upon the previous VRA "Vail Map". This work is
now completed. In order to proceed with the lay out and production on both the
"All and "B" maps in quantity to fill the need over the next 10-12 months (50, 000 of
"A" -- 201000 "B"), we estimate that the total cost of these two map projects will
be $7,500.00 (including the $1,500.00 "front money" the VRA has already put into
the basic map art).
Direct funding from the TOWN OF VAIL in the amount of $3,500.00 would make it
possible to accomplish the total project at an early date. Such_ materials would be
identified as joint projects of the VRA and the TOWN OF VAIL.
2. OUTDOOR INFORMATION PHONES:
In addition to the existing network of 8 outdoor information phones connected to the
VRA switchboard, it would be most desirable to add a maximum of 4 more stations
in the Village core and Lionshead. The cost of building the mounting boards, map
ames, etc., and initial installation of the special, enclosed phones is estimated
cost $500.00. The new phones would be located in the Lionshead Plaza, the Lions-
head Bus Stop, the Covered Bridge Plaza, and the Post Office.
3. OUTDOOR INFORMATION KIOSKS:
We would hope to construct 4 permanent information Kiosks to be located at key
pedestrian traffic points in the Town. These information point units would need to
be well designed, and constructed in such a manner as to withstand weather and other
normal wear-and-tear. Also, we feel these kiosks should be electrified so that
information displayed there could be seen at night. The VRA Would be responsible
for up-dating the information, announcements, etc. on a regular, scheduled basis.
The cost of 4 such kiosks is estimated at approximately $500.00 each, plus an additional
$500.00 for wiring and installation.
4. SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS:
it the past several years the VRA has functioned as the sponsor for 4th of July,
i iilfest, and Winterfest. On several occasions the TOWN OF VAIL has made direct,
separate contributions to such events. We would hope that a fund of $1,500.00 could
be established by the TOWN to add to the direct funding of such specific activities in
cooperation with the VRA.
a
r
-2-
In the spirit of this program, it is understood that the TOWN has tentatively approved
a $500.00 donation toward the fireworks display scheduled for July 4th. The other
$1,000.00 included in this allocation request would be equally divided between "Vail-
fest" and "Winterfest" costs this year.
Any funding for these projects will be subject to a detailed accounting of expenditures
y the VRA to the TOWN OF VAIL at the conclusion of such specific activities or
rojects .
PROPOSED BUDGET
(Town of Vail Participation)
1. VAI L MAPS ("A" & "B" style) $3,500.00
2. INFORMATION PHONES (Add 4) . $ 500.00
3. OUTDOOR KIOSKS (4) $2,500.00
4. COMMUNITY EVENTS (3) $1,500.00
TOTAL: $8,000.00
S ECTION II
addition to the specific projects listed above, the following community development
rojects are recommended for priority consideration by the TOWN OF VAIL:
A - IMPROVE VEHICULAR SIGNING: In the interest of guest convenience, and to
minimize vehicular traffic in the area, direction signs indicating the shortest route
to key points within the community should be erected at key entrance and crossroad
points. Such direction signs should be large enough to be fully visable to oncoming
vehicular traffic.
B - FLATLANDER (HIKING) TRAIL: The need for a pedestrian hiking trail which
does not require radical up-mountain, down-mountain movement is clearly documented.
Such a trail could -serve a dual purpose by being utilized for tour--skiers in the winter.
It has been suggested that the old flume line starting at the base of Gold Peak and
moving east would be a good route for consideration. Both V.A.I. and the Forest
Service have indicated their interest in working the TOWN on this general project.
C - OUTDOOR AMPHITHEATER: The need for a outdoor amphitheater seating 100-
200 persons has been a topic of community discussion for several years. A natural
Gl acility for this function exists at the location of the old golf tee #9 just east of the
occer field. With a minimum of landscaping and seating this site could fill the need
for the present, and could continue to function with additional 'facilities of this general
type which may evolve out of ongoing long-range planning.
jt
r ?
•
CC_C?A)0
MC,\--A\
CONTINUING EDUCATION DIVISION
June 14, 1973
Mr. John Dobson, Mayor
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado
Dear Mr. Dobson:
In our efforts to serve the people of Vail with various educational
programs through the Continuing Education Division, we have been
interested in the availability of suitable facilities in the Town of
Vail. Randy Milhoan, our representative for Eagle County, has kept
me informed of the discussions focusing on the A-frame building at
the former sewage plant.
Colorado Mountain College is very interested in supporting your think-
ing for community education and would like to participate further in
the planning for the development of this potential site. We envision
being able to provide educational programs in a center devoted primarily
to this purpose as we already do in other towns in our service area.
Randy has put considerable energy into the very successful Summervail
Art Workshops over the past two summers. We hope that these efforts
can continue to contribute to the life of Vail. A key factor is a
suitable site. If this site were developed properly, it could provide
not only summer but also year round space for educational programs.
It could house programs not only of the College but also of other
community groups.
If T can be of help to you in developing plans for this site, please
let me know.
Sincerely,
ate. 1
r C °yyv??
Geo ge tricker
Director of Continuing Education
GWS/vh
c/c Randy Milhoan
GARFIELD COUNTY OFFICE- HOTEL COLORADO-528 PINE- GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO $1 601 -303/945-7495
. w
•
•
L
CONTINUING EDUCATION DIVISION
TO: John Dobson, Mayor, Town of Vail
Jim Slevin, President, Vail Institute
George Stricker, Director, Continuing Education Division, Colorado Moun-
tain College
FROM: Randy Milhoan, Eagle County Representati :
RE: Utilization by Colorado Mountain College of old sewage plant in
Vail, Colorado.
DATE: June 15, 1973
Colorado Mountain College, as major sponsor of the SummerVail Art Workshop,
could well utilize the above mentioned property. The workshop has grown
from two weeks in 1971 to more than six weeks in 1973, and with a permanent
location, could expand to cover the entire summer in the future. Planning
of the facilities could benefit from the expertise and advice of the various
visiting artists in the summer program. For example, the kiln building work-
shop this year could provide several non-polluting kilns that could be used
permanently. The building also could be used for permanent facilities for
such classes as ceramics, silversmithing, printmaking, etc.
Attached, please find a complete list of classes and workshops for the 1973
SummerVail program. All of these classes could meet within the building
and on the surrounding property being discussed here.
For the fall, winter, and spring quarters, Colorado Mountain College could
offer a smaller variety of classes in these facilities. There are several
resource people that are qualified to teach for Colorado Mountain College -
Peg Malloy, ceramics, Jim Cotter, silversmithing, Randy Milhoan, drawing,
and others. Colorado Mountain College could greatly expand the offerings of
these types of classes in Vail if we had a permanent facility. An interim
quarter workshop utilizing visiting artists, much the same way we do for the
SummerVail Workshop could be established on a somewhat smaller scale. This
workshop could run over the Christmas holidays and perhaps throughout the
month of January. Colorado Mountain College can also provide guest artists
throughout the year, such as Larry Clark from Boulder and Dick Smith from
Leadville, to give demonstrations or one day workshops for interested child-
ren and adults in the area.
Suggested utilization of the building would be ceramics, sculpture, and
40 storage on the basement level, storage, printmaking, drawing, and possibly
silversmithing and photography on the second floor, and a third floor could
be built in to house two offices which could be administered, in part, by
Colorado Mountain College and the Vail Institute. The office could provide
meeting spaces, record storage, and act as a clearinghouse for information
on all cultural activities in Vail and the upper Eagle Valley. Kilns could
be constructed inside near the rear of the building and directly behind the
building.
0 451 Main Street 9 Sox 117 .• Minturn, Colorado 81645 • 303/827-5665 •
C C.000CC)
CCCC? . n,V
CC - _
CONTINUING EDUCATION DIVISION
The way Colorado Mountain College could help directly this summer is by
providing man power (instructors, assistants, and students) to help with
clean-up and construction, painting, and planning for future use of the
facility.
On a final note, I would like to suggest a meeting during the last week of
July between the 23rd and the 27th, that would bring together participants
in the workshop, various decision makers in the town of Vail (Vail Associates,
Vail. Resort Association, Town Council., etc.) and interested citizens in
the community, which would discuss the future of the SummerVail Workshop
and its relationship to Vail Institute, Town of Vail., Colorado Mountain College,
etc. I think this would be a very valuable meeting.
Thank you.
•
•
• 451 Main Street • Box 117 • Minturn, Colorado 81645 • 303/827-5665 9
7 y tit N
"
" H C } 7? C!2 ?] m
' n
o Cn W Cn rd rd z [7 FtS CJ ?? Cl] rti ??. i r? n C7
'TJ M m
m m rD
'
9
, ' C7
t-'
?
f%
O
G G OQ m
t't W r
i? d
rD rD r
ri n n rt :5
?S
(u
G r. 0 0 a ft
" W
rn
0 rt W
F"- P• H. N n F4 W rt P. rt rt Fi rp'
C
,C cn O
o (D rat N• W
o ^C 'd ? O a r
.
t ? 0- ? P• w .4 w C
- Cl)
rt rt (D •
?t w ri rt • n
rr rr m OQ OQ Ft rt i W rD ro w
"d r; x n r- (0 m N n G CL i n U ro M?J 34 (D ?J rt C) ry > n n
(D ( rn (a (n
Q" W rt
r rn rt r! iu N w
D (D
'0 ; ?j OQ N In w cn
En
'
• - H W 0 Cn
(n
tt rr
H.
d H F-' 0
¢• d
Q
H (
42 c1
0
H
`C `C ? 0
+ ?
R
Y -
r4 w H ? ? rt Frt rt
?
F1 H
rt -Cfr
QQ.:
F-+ :n m (Z+ 1 4. 0
H
H Ln > (D G7 ::r'
0° 0 N (D (n ".H ' Ft ri 0 w OQ W
C
? o (n rr H 1 rnt H r. .
• d QQ 1-1
rt a m g 0 0 :J m
CQ
rat ? ? ? ?'{ •? !'.? ?? -
ro (EQ
H• #?>'t7 O
rt O ?
I L- w
` H 4 4 L? tT] Cn N]
' G] 7d Li C-4 t C-.r 4
t?
? Fd kn ? '
P.
v F r
z
d pi •
A? 0° H
?
- (D
C
ro n ?: O
0 x
? N
ri w W p F
G O
i Ft En 0 r
W O 0 w
µ• X 5 2 C4
D ro '
e 0
i
rt W x-
r ro (n
H
r o (D
C r
H• 0
id ? w C a. (D
O (D w
x 7C kj ?j -
w (
1? (n N 0
OQ
Qs
O W' 0 fD x H w
O Q
W O
O H,
''
C (n n x Ln (D O F j F m bj w (D H? m cn rt
' O
€-+ a
' °
rt En rt x w ."r W Ft ? CT' CS' A? rt W rt Q
W W tt rt a
ti H
H
O Fn rt ri 14
M
m
N F i (n
'
F?
m m W O W (13
n O (n W (D
J
(D c
0 m N (D 0 H
?
(D ?3
w
?:j ?j tj n ? ;3
rz W (D (D ?
N (D W rt H {!} `? O (D ;J 0 Cn {D :a' ? OQ F? ? tJ rl (D ps CO ¢u rD
Fs. m ?-+ H• F- • Al 4v Cn n n (D Hdr rt rt
Ul O (D Q En ti ri iv
-y
Frr (D N A3 (D OQ " (D
-a> a' H, N rr+ O4 OQ ri (D (D
O4
-cr). W m (D F-+ H rt
? rn m
H+ - •b m 7d
?
oo?•? `
° R. rE' P.
. ., .• rD sn
Fri ID
m
44 w c.,
Oa s n _. a O
(D E
h
(D l
E
f) U
O '?
?
rt ti O
Ch E t
t r
1
n
W V
V
(
n G ?
m x
10
° (M
m
rr 09 rt ro
rt (D En
H• rt CA
m rt
I G 11
UI n H.
Q
rt 0 r,
¢a (4 W
rt rt 0
(D {n •cf>v> •V> -U>
l a
N O
n U
Ln L
E
i
- o rD
o
r
n m r
r °o6.
H. Id (0 0 C) CD CD CD
n, (D (n o 0
x tt rr rt
rt rD W a 0 a
K m r-r rt rr
(n rt N Iv Iv
w m ? u
a w
-C* rt
F? t-h
LnF'•rt
O (D
am
. rt
t7l Q
O Q (v W W U) W
H rtr
?
ID (D "
DC
ro
F
171 d
?
s
GQ
c) m
(D
tt to
Rs
En H
rt ',3'
(D
4 U
G.
m
w ?
• rt
C
H
t"
C
!
N
ti
. . . m
Ln i--+ ??F-, F- Cf? Oo flo W M M W 1--+ W i-oo }--! Co
Q POO p w...ww. W{{.??.? {{.
OOC? Qd°
! I i ! ! I 1 ! ! ! i I ! ! i ! !
tX+ L1--C ?f' I- Ft F?NwH ?F+ A HEN
• c- W F1 F-A .. F•? F., F" Fa
<D CWD 0 CD
r? ti
W W
O O
1 1
-tf> ti- rn cJ> (f> trr {,> -vr yr v> tr> {rr v>
n r3 ? t-n Q C) ? Ln U C) O, 0 ? cHn uHr Ul
o ro ro room oca tiro m o OOc
° (D C) o r7 O Ca C7 °
rt rr'
0 0
rt rt
? FJ
W W W W W W' W?? W W W W
! I
(D (D
Pu a.
W W
rt rt
H
H
H
m
Ftj
M
rd
W W W W C7
H H I
H w- F- F- ;--• W w W H w' Fa !- H !- F-j F-+ I-" '
Ln Ur Ln O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln In to Ln Ln O C7 In Ln
! E k
N N N
H
H
H
r3 .. v r. W
C7 (D
M n n
Cj En > H co
tTi m aA fn cm
u i CK1 ? ?
?
(f}, .. H
Gri
June 19, 1973
MEMORANDUM i
TO: TOWN COUN CIL _
FROMr DIANA TOU GHILL
RE: SUNBURST SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTR ICT
DENSITY C OMPARISON WITH 1!AIL VILLAGE AND LIONSHEAD
VAIL VILLAGE
Floor Area Ratio Zone Building Sizes Lot Sizes
1.397:1.0 Commercial Core 1 496,586.00 355,400.00
.612:1.0 Commercial Core 11 44,015.94 65,299.60
..380:1.0 Commercial Service
Center 65,809.00 116,066.00
.960:1'.0 Public Accommodations 581,793.00 604,713.00
LIONSHEAD -
1.246:1.0 Commercial Core 11 708,987.93 569,065.43
.899:.1.0 High Density '.'.ulti-
Family, east 271,683.53 302,067.87
N/A Nigh Density i?u I ti -
Famiiy, west Ail Phased --
.840:1.0 Public Accommodations 68,523.00 81,203.00
SUNBURST
.777:1.0 Development Area A 511,518.00 658,308.00
.215:1.0 Development Area 3 221,352.00 1,031,817.00
.434:1.0 Average Density
June 15, 19 73
Mayor John Dobson
Members of the Town Council.
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 86157
Re: Sunburst at Vail
Dear Mayor Dobson:
Royston
Hanamot o
Beck &
Abey
Enclosed is an analysis on our part of the suitability of the design
and of the completeness of the Sunburst submittal for review by the
Town Council on June 19, 1973.
In that I am unable to attend the meeting, it seemed advisable that
I prepare this analysis to assist in your decision on the project.
The analysis refers frequently to Section 13 of the proposed Ordinance,
so I suggest that copies of that Section be distributed with this report.
Good luck.
Sincerely,
RO ON, HANA O, BECK & ABEY
cool.
on tm
cc: Mr. Terrell J. Minger
Mr. Joseph Clancy
Seracuse Lawler & Partners, Inc.
Livingston and Blayney
Principals: Associates:
Landscape Architects: Robert Royston ASLA Patricia Carlisle ASLA
Land Planning Asa Hanamoto ASLA Louis G. Alley, Architect
Urban Dcsign Eldon Beck ASLA Harold N. Kobayashi ASLA
Park Planning Kazuo Abey ASLA Juan Carlos Calderon
So Green Street
Sao Francisco
California 94111
(415)397-0594
•
SUNBURST AT VAIL
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Submitted to the Town of Vail
by
ROYSTON, HANAMOTO, BECK & ABEY
June 19, 1973
•
PROJECT HISTORY
Early in 1973 the Developers and Architects for the project called
"Sunburst at Vail", submitted. preliminary site analysis information to
the Town of Vail as the beginning of a continual site development dia-
logue with Town officials and with the firms of Royston, Hanamoto,
Beck & Abey and Livingston and Blayney, acting as Design and Planning
Consultants for the Town.
Numerous meetings were held over a period of months culminating
in a presentation by the Developer to a joint meeting of the Town Council
and Planning Commission on April 19, 1973. At this meeting it was
agreed that the density and number of units would reduce by 15%, and
that stringent height limitations would be required.
On May 9, 1973, a meeting was held in Denver attended by the
Developer and his representatives, Town staff members, and the Town
..Design Consultant. The design was again reviewed, changes were re-
quested, and the initial draft of the Special Development District Ordin-
ance was discussed.
On May 18, 1973, a meeting was held in San Francisco, attended by
the same participant,5 and the building mass and density allocations were
judged to be in accordance with the decisions of past meetings. The
Ordinance was discussed with further modifications required.
On June 11, 1973, a meeting was held in Denver, attended by the
Developer and his representatives, and the Town Design Consultant to
review all material being submitted to the Town for presentation on
June 19, 1973.. The remainder of this report describes the suitability of
the submittal with recommendations and/or observations where considered
appropriate. The Ordinance was discussed at the meeting and was judged
to accurately reflect language agreed to.
In that Article 13, Special Development District 1, of the proposed
Town Zoning Ordinance, contains the proper wording describing the.
Development Plan submittal requirements, its format in Section 13. 301
Findings, and 13. 302 Content, will be followed.
•
1
13. 301 FINDINGS
The following findings are to be made before approving a develop-
ment plan:
1. Adequacy of Transportation Plan Accommodating Vehicular
Movement, Transit and Parking
Consultants Opinion:
(a) Road System - The road across the golf course requires
improvement and the widening and/or reinforcement of
the bridge over Gore Creek. The Developer has agreed
to these improvements. The improved road will be ade-
quate to serve the project. The roadway serving the
adjacent residential area must be blocked or restricted to
limited access so that there is no possibility of intrusion
of new traffic into the residential area.
In the Consultants opinion, the Developer should add
appropriate landscape and a safe golfer tunnel or other
method of road crossing to ameliorate the visual and
physical impact of added traffic on this roadway. A plan
showing these improvements was not prepared in time for
this submittal but has been promised.
(b) Transit System - The proposed transit system was
described in the Developer's report submitted on April 19,
1973, and in the current submittal. The five--year pro-
jection of bus use appears to be realistic and it is probable
that a Town-wide and Valley-wide transportation system,
either operated publicly or privately, will be in use. A
wide spread system may satisfy normal daily use but it
seems reasonable to require that major developments have
adequate supplemental busing for peak loads, such as
morning skier service.
The transportation section of the submittal report describes
a system in general but does not precisely quarantee the
operation of the system. It is imperative that the bus
system be implemented. A further specific legal agree-
ment seems essential.
(c) Parking - The proposed parking is totally covered. This
is of distinct advantage to the Town and is a positive step
on the part of the Developer.
2
It appears that there is adequate space in the garages for
either a self -parking or valet parking system.
•
Conclusion
It appears that the above three elements of the plan can be
solved, however, proper and full documentation of acceptable
solutions were not available at the time of writing this report.
2. Adequacy of Open Space and Recreation Facilities
Consultants Opinion
Recreation facilities are well provided within the project, and
in most instances, exceed what is normally provided in a pro-
ject of this scope. The list of activities is included in the Sun-
burst Submittal Report, and are shown on the plans. The pro-
ject is deficient in only one respect, and that is the provision
of any significant open grass space for spontaneous summer-
time sports. The site characteristics prevent this type of
facility which must then be provided elsewhere in Vail. There
will also be significant impact upon the use of the golf course.
Conclusion
• The Development provides an adequate range of open space and
recreational facilities.
Development Area "A" requires 660 cars by the proposed
Ordinance. Space is provided for 730 cars, self-parked
or 820 valet parked.
Development Area "B" requires approximately 300 cars
by the Ordinance. Space is provided for 300 cars, self -
parked or 350 cars valet parked.
The Development Plans submitted for review by the Town
do not represent an acceptable solution to the parking.
At the meeting of June 11, 1973, an improved scheme
was discussed, providing for an interior ramping system
and elimination of many of the garage access openings.
These improvements will reduce the number of cars
parked, .however, the space appears to be adequate to
meet Town requirements. Proper plans should be avail-
able for presentation on June 19, 1973..
•
•
3. Proper Environmental Respect
The report of April 19, 1973 and the current submittal contains
information pertaining to the following:
(a) Soils conditions, geology and stability analysis
(b) Existing plant materials
(c) Drainage characteristics, hydrologic investigation
(d) Avalanche conditions, rock fall hazards
(e) Slope conditions, erosive characteristics
{f} Soil borings, construction precautions
Consultants Opinion
The on-site environmental research has been thorough and the
resulting site development plan respects the conclusions of the
research. The avalanche section of the submittal report states
that monitoring of the hillside is currently in process and that
Y., .. sufficient data for a fairly definitive analysis of control structures
-will'be available during the Spring of 1974. Approval of the pro-
ject Development Plan must include agreement as to implemen-
tation of control structures prior to any building occupancy.
Acoustic information has not been calculated to date. Acoustic
influence of freeway on the project, and of the project on the
golf course must be documented. If problems exist, corrective
measures must be recommended by the Developer.
Conclusion
With the exception of acoustic information, the environmental
analysis is thorough and acceptable.
4
13.302 CONTENT
The Development Plan submittal is to include adequate information
pertaining to seven specific requirements. The following is the Consultants
analysis of the adequacy of the submittal.
1.. Existing contours are shown on the plans.. Proposed contours
have not been completed as of this writing. It is essential that
they be shown. However, it ig the Congultant recommendation
that this information be accepted at a later date. The grading
problems appear to be solvable but must be properly documented
and submitted to the Town.
2. The site plan is adequate in showing proper locations and
dimensions of buildings, landscape areas, recreation facilities,
pedestrian plazas and walkways and service areas. The modi-
fied plan showing revisions to off street parking and loading
areas is to be available on June 19, 1973. A successful solution
is probable.
3. The preliminary landscape plan is essentially adequate. How-
ever, a revision to the size and character of the large swimming
pool between buildings A and C was considered essential, and
this portion of the plan is to be revised. A successful solution
is probable.
4. Preliminary building elevations, sections and floor plans are
adequate. The proposed materials of stucco surfaces, wooden
balconies, dark glass and frames, and dark red/brown pavers
on the terrace is acceptable.
The general scale and appearence of the proposed development
is understandable and of low enough height to be well buffered
by tree planting.
5. The transportation submittal is fairly complete, although the
parking solutions require modification. This subject has been
described earlier in 13. 301(1).
6. A plan of off -site improvements has not been included in the
submittal. This requirement must be satisfied.
7. Architectural models have been submitted.
5
GENERAL COMMENTS
L
1. Sections 1 3. 400 through 13. 710 describe the project limita-
tions in detail. The building heights are slightly higher than
were agreed to in the Council/Commission meeting of April. 19,
1973, however, the slope of the hill and off -site drainage
requirements have dictated this variation. After careful and
intensive work with the Architect, the writer is of the opinion
that the heights, massing proportions, and arrangement on the
site is a realistic and successful solution to the design problem.
2. Further coordination design work between the Developer and
Town staff is necessary to achieve a successful solution to
modifications of the golf course. Existing golf course parking
must change. It appears possible to park 8,0 cars (approximate)
near the Clubhouse and the Developer proposes making available
space in the Sunburst garage for overflow parking. This pro-
posal requires further design study and some type of formal-use
agreement. The Sunburst Development Plan shows extensive
tree planting along, and on, the edge of the golf course. This
planting must not be displaced by a parking lot.
3. Employee housing of 44, 000 square feet was indicated on early
plans. The Town opinion is that this is essential. Implementa-
tion must be agreed to.
4. Fire safety has been discussed with the Fire Marshall and
agreed upon fire access routes are shown in the submittal report.
A letter documenting approval from the Fire Marshall must be
secured and kept on file.
5. The Town Engineer assures that utility services are all satis-
factory. A letter documenting this fact must be secured and
kept on file.
6. Along with review of the Site Development Plan, Building "A"
was reviewed specifically for preliminary design approval.
The submittal was incomplete for full review as follows:
(a) Finish grading plan not provided.
(b) Project area not defined, related landscape plan
required showing recreation elements, trails,
earth work, planting and irrigation.
(c) Off -site improvements not provided.
(d) The parking plan was reviewed and is being modified.
6
The building appearance and palette of materials was
considered acceptable. With submittal of a proper
parking layout, approval to proceed with site work and
foundations would be in order. The total submittal must
then be reviewed in detail by the Design Review Board in
accord with Article 15 of the Ordinance.
•
•
u
7
OVERALL CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Developer and his representatives have been most cooperative
in attempting to create a project respectful of the desires of the Town.
Considering densities permitted on the site, the project as designed
is well sited and can merge with the mountainscape if heavily planted as
proposed. Its immediate visual impact will be strong but will soften
with a maturing landscape. The height of buildings is such that trees
can equal or exceed in height a significant proportion of the buildings.
The mix of hotel with condominiums and small. commerical facilities
seems workable for the commerical facilities are limited in size and
scope and will not be of such size to be considered another Town Center.
The recreation facilities anticipated will benefit both the project and the
Town.
In our opinion, the project can be a satisfcatory one. The various
submittal deficiencies are significant but approval could be granted based
upon a reasonable time committment from the Developer ds to supplying
missing.or modified information.
•
8
r_ r
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JULY 3, 1973
1. Discussion of proposed new zoning ordinance;
Mr. Livingston to be present.
2. First reading of proposed new sign ordinance;
MUM, -
3. Notice to be taken that- applications have
been received for vacancy on Planning Commission.
4. Consideration of minutes of May 15, 1973 and
June 5, 1973;
5. Ice Arena Status;
6. Reports from the Town Manager.
. b.
C.
d.
e.
Kayaking venture on Gore Creek;
Annual library report;
Cable TV negotiations; and
Town Bicycle Program.
Discussion of Landscaping and
Improvements to Gore Creek Plaza.
•
j'
i
AGFATDA
for Public Meeting on the
VAIL MASTER PLAN
July 12, 1973
1. HISTORY OF MASTER P EAN.
Process
Community Priorities
Information Base ;
Aerial Photography
Town Inventory
Design/Day Ski Capacities
Public Meetings
Parking Inventory Analysis
II. VAIL MASTER PLAN.
Greenbelt and Open Space
Bikeways and Hiking Trails
Public Transportation System
Regional Transit Authority
Recreational Amenities
Ice Arena
Performing Arts
Tennis
Tot Lots
Recreation Center
Community Swimming Pool
Town Landscape Plan
Pedestrian Precincts
Parking/Transportation Center Location
Specific Design Elements
Entrance to Vail.
Parking/Transportation Center Landscape
Antholz Land Use Plan
III. TRANSPORTATION CENTER/PARKING STRUCTURE.
Parking Structure
Design and Function
Circulation
Size Considerations
Park and Plaza Concept
Window on Vail
Transportation Center
Bus Depot
Rental Cars
V.R.A.
V.A.
Kiosk
Coffee Shop
Civic Auditorium
Multiple Use
Size
Design
Cost
IV. Overview
Cost
Financing
Parking Rates
Sales Tax
Time Frame
Bond Election
Date
Scope
3
Eligibility
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
JULY 17 , 1973
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
1 Consideration of a request from Vail Valley Enterprises (The Place at
Vail) for an expansion of the licensed 'premises .
2. Consideration of a request from the Vail Institute for a 3.2 Beer special
events permit for August 10, 1973.
Convene as the Town Council.
1. Second reading of Ordinance No. 8 (Series of 1973); proposed new
zoning ordinance for the Town of Vail.
2. First reading of Ordinance No. 9 (Series of 1973); proposed new sign
ordinance.
3. First reading of Ordinance No. 10 (Series of 1973); special elections
ordinance.
4. First reading of Ordinance No. 11 (Series of 1973); sales tax ordinance.
5. Public hearing on the petitions for annexation of the territory commonly
known as Vail Village, 11th Filing; findings of fact and conclusions.
6. Consideration of request from Vail Associates, Inc. for a conditional
use permit to allow construction of a snowmaking pumphouse.
7. Acceptance of resignation of Jim Slevin from the Planning Commission.
8. Appointment of two members to form the Town of Vail Election Commission.
9. Appointment of a new member to the Board of Appeals and Examiners.
10. Discussion of winter shuttle bus program.
11 . Consideration of minutes of June 19 and July 3, 1973.
/•T. dJ-?. _ . .. ]fit °"
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
AUGUST 7, 1973
•
•
1. Second reading of Ordinance No. 8, proposed new zoning ordinance.
2. Second reading of Ordinance No. 10, special elections ordinance.
3. Second reading of Ordinance No. 11 , sales tax ordinance.
4. First reading of Ordinance No. 12, annexation ordinance for Vail Village
11th Filing.
5. First reading of Ordinance No. 13, an ordinance regulating bicycle and
pedestrian paths.
6. Consideration of a resolution calling a special election on September 25, 1973.
7. Consideration of a request from Vail Associates, Inc. for a conditional
use permit for a snow-making pumphouse.
8. Consideration of a request for a parking variance from Ernst Larese.
9. Consideration of minutes of July 12, and July 17, 1973.
10. Appointment of a new member to the Planning Commission.
11. Public hearing on proposed Town of Vail Master Plan.
40
VAI L PLAN AGENDA
AUGUST 7, 1973
•
•
r?
I. VAI L MASTER PLAN
Introduction
Greenbelt and Open Space
Bikeways and Hiking Trails
Public Transportation System
Regional Transit Authority
Recreational Amenities
ice Arena
Performing Arts
Tennis
Tot Lots
Recreation Center
Community Swimming Pool
Town Landscape Plan
Pedestrian Precincts
Parking/Transportation Center Location
Specific Design Elements
Entrance to Vail
Parking/Transportation Center Landscape
Antholz Land Use Plan
II. TRANSPORTATION CENTER/PARKING STRUCTURE
Introduction
Parking Structure
Design and Function
Circulation
Size Considerations
Park and Plaza Concept
Window on Vail
Transportation Center
Bus Depot
Rental Cars
V.R.A.
V. A.
Kiosk
Coffee Shop
Civic Auditorium
Multiple Use
S ize
Design
Cost
III. OVERVIEW
Introduction
Cost
Financing
Parking Rates
Sales Tax
Time Frame
Bond Election
Date
Scope
Eligibility
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
AUGUST 21, 1973
. 1. Second reading of Ordinance No. 9; proposed new sign ordinance.
2. Second reading of Ordinance No. 12; annexation of Vail Village,
11th Filing.
3. Second reading of Ordinance No. 13; regulating the use of the
bicycle and pedestrian paths.
4. First reading of Ordinance No. 14; landscaping ordinance.
5. Consideration of a request from Mountain Bell for a parking variance.
6. Consideration of a request from Ernst Larese for a parking variance.
7. Consideration of suggested fees to be charged under the new zoning
ordinance.
8. Appointment of a new member to the Planning Commission.
9. Recognition of the existence of two vacancies on the Design Review
Board; appointment to be made September 18.
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authbr^ity.
1. Consideration of an application from the Rotary Club for a special
events permit.
Applicants for the, Planning Commission.
Jack Fritzlen ( Planning Commission recommendation)
Dudley Holmes
Bill Ruoff
•
1
Summary of Changes to Sign Ordinance No. 9 after First Readinq
Section 1. General Provisions.
3) Definitions
. a) Administrator - Administrator will also enforce
ordinance.
c} Sign
8. Temporary Site Development Sign
Added: and may include "model apartment".
10. Flag
Shall mean any state or national flag.
Section 2, Desiqn Review Guidelines,
8) Added: Lighting should be of no greater wattage
than is necessary to make the sign visible at night.
9) Temporary signs other than site development signs
are discouraged except for non-profit community
events and public information signs which should be
located on public information kiosks.
Section 5. Information Required on Permits and Certificates.
1) Sign Application Permit
c} Added: and paragraph
I) Lineal feet of frontage.
Section 14.
20) Added: Public information signs.
1) Wall Siqns: Single Business Use.
c) Height of top of sign changed from plate
line to 25 above average grade.
d) Number: Added: With a maximum of two
per business.
h) Special Provisions:
2) Deleted
3) Basement entrance signs may range in size
from 3 to 12 square feet at the discretion
of the Design Review Board.
Page 2
2) Wall Signs: Individual Business Within a Multi-
Tehant Building.
b) Businesses with insufficient frontage
will be allowed 3 square feet of signs.
E
U
c) Maximum height of top of sign may extend
above 25' from average grade.
h) Special Provisions:
5) Basement entrance signs may range in size
from 3 to 12 square feet at the discretion
of the Design Review Board.
3) Wail Signs: Joint Directory Signs for a Multi-
Tenant Building.
h) Special Provisions:
I} Delete paragraph.
2) Delete: 'other'.
5) Free--Standinq Signs: Single Business Use.
e) Signs may now be in front setback area.
7) Projecting and Hanging Signs: Single Business Use.
b} Size: Three square feet of sign will be allowed
for a business with insufficient frontage.
c) Top of sign may not be over 25' above average
grade.
i) Special Provisions:
2) Basement entrance signs may range in size
from 3 to 12 square feet at the discretion
of the Design Review Board.
8) Projecting and Hanging Signs: Individual Business
Within a Multi=Tenant Building.
b) Three square feet will be allowed for a business
with insufficient frontage.
c) Top of sign may not extend above 25' from average
grade.
i) Special Provisions:
4) Basement entrance signs may range in size
from 3 to 12 square feet at the discretion
of the Design Review Board.
Page 3
•
•
9) Projecting and Hanging Signs: Joint Directory,
S i cans for a Mu I ti -Tenan# Bu i l d i nq_.
c) T'op of sign may not exceed 25' from average grade.
10) Projecting and Flanging Signs: Arcade.
e) interior mall changed to arcade.
12) Display Boxes.
b) Size reduced to 3 square feet.
d) May only have one face.
13) Residential Name Plate Signs.
b) Size reduced to .5 square feet.
14) Subdivision Entrance Signs..
b) Size reduced to 20 square feet.
15) Temporary Site Development Signs.
b) Sentence referring to multi-sided signs de leted.
c) Top of sign may not exceed 25' from average grade.
e) Sign may be located in front setback,
h) Special Provisions:
1) Deleted.
3) May include "model apartment".
16) Traffic Control Signs for Private Property.
g) None allowed.
i) Special Provisions:
4) Added: if Town "no parking" signs are used
no other sign for the same purpose may be
used,
17) Flags, Pennants, Banners and Bunting,
b) Size: deleted.
Flags: Shall have proportions as prescribed
by Presidential Declaration.
f) Administrator may approve subject to review of
Design Review Board.
+ h
Page 4
i) Special Provisions:
3) Pennants used for advertising must be
approved by the Design Review Board.
20) Public Information Signs: Section Added
Section Ib. Nonconforming Signs.
2) Continuance of nonconforming signs 'maintained'
changed to 'restored'.
3) Termination of nonconforming signs.
d) Section added to allow condemnation.
•
l?
L .l
- -
AGENDA
1 7_j
r?
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
SEPTEMBER 4, 1973
1. Second reading of Ordinance No. 14, landscaping ordinance.
2. First reading of Ordinance No. 15, authorizing municipal borrowing.
3. First reading of Ordinance No. 16, supplemental expenditures.
4. Consideration of suggested fees for the new zoning ordinance.
5. Discussion of the Mall Act of 1970.
6. Consideration of a request from Ernst Larese for a parking variance.
7. Discussion of status of cemetery in Vail Intermountain.
8. Report on July voucher list.
9. Consideration of minutes of June 25, June 26, June 27, August 7,
and August 15, 1973.
Reports from the Town Manager.
A. Parking charges.
B. Use Tax..
C. A-frame costs for the winter.
D. Bond issue fact sheet.
E. Day care center.
F. Status of Bighorn annexation.
4Choate & Turner Realty Corporation
Box 400 • Vail, Colorado 81657 • Telephone (303) 476-2300
is A
29 August 1973
Chief of Police
Vail Police Department
Vail, Colorado 81657
Ue-.ar Chief Wall:
I would like to take this opportunity to express
my appreciation for the immediate response your staff
provided when I called for assistance in the appre-
hension of a burlary suspect in the Bighorn area on
28 August 1973.
Within: five minutes of the time I first spoke
with your dispatcher: the suspect was under arrest.
There was no hesitation or reminder from your staff
that they had no obligation to furnish any type police
protection in the Bighorn area.
The professional manner in which you and your
staff conducted the investigation and collection of
evidence was highly commeridable. It is gratifying
to know that such an unsavory character as this burg-
lar is now where he belongs - in jail awaiting trial..
I :Look forward to the time when the bighorn is
annexed to Vail and the. services of your fine depart-
ment are available to the citizens of the Bighorn on
a. full time basis.
Sincerely,
19 Harlan E. Choate
cc : +-Vail. City Manager
Vail Trail
box 1aa a vai1, Colorado 81657 a 303.475.6613°
MEMO
TO: TERRELL J. MINDER
FROM: STANLEY F. BERNSTEIN
DATE: AUGUST 30, 1973
RE: 3% USE TAX vs 1% SALES TAX ANALYSIS
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
3% 1%
USE TAX SALES TAX
YEAR YIEI,DS * ?F ,OLDS
1974 200,000 367,000
1975 200,000 424,000
1976 200,000 470,000
1977 100,000 517,000
1978 100,000 558,000
*BASED UPON AVERAGE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF $10,000,000,,f YEAR FOR
THE NEXT 3 YEARS AND 5.,000,000/YEAR FO.R THE NEXT 2 YEARS
ADDITIONAL COi21ENTS :
1.. Ir THE TOWN OF VAIN DID IMPOSE A' USE-TAX THE -STA'T'E OF COLD AD0 .1,70ULD NO
LONGER.ApSINISTF_ OUR SALES- ''AX-AD.DI`IIO?IAL- ADMINISTRATIVE. C -STS -'-WOULD BE
$20.,000- $10,00.0 4,NNUAj,LV.
2. THE USE T23N, IS A TE?IVOR:!?_RY SOURCE OF ' REVS, NUE M ie : IT IS DECLTN'I`1G "
AS CONSTRQCTION WITHIN Ti? TOW •OF 'VAIL DECLINES. `SHE SALES `SAX LS A
GRQWi,,NG SOERC.E OF 'i:.,'WNUE .
3. 'F'ROM YEAR- TO YEAR I°' IS- ?%T EI'CULT TO DUik= 'A USE--TAX AS 0PP0SEED TO A
SALES. TAX.. THIS. FACT ;vOULD .USE--TAX BONDS MORE DIFFICULT TO iv??2°KET
THAN BONDS BA.C:;.ED BY S -? TA;? .ZEV,;?iU ,S ,
iw
•
rI
box loo • vall, colorado 81 657 s 303. 476-561 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town Council
FROM: Terrell J. Minger
DATE: September 4, 1973
SUBJECT: Suggested fees for new zoning ordinance
Section 15.700 Design Review Fee. The following is a
suggested fee schedule:
The Design Review Fee shall be based upon the project
valuation as follows:
VALUATION FEE
• Under $25,000 $25.00
$25,000 - $100,000 50.00
$100,000 - $500,000 100.00
$500,000 - $1,000,000 150.00
$1,000,000 and over 200.00
Any charge made by an outside consultant shall be borne
by the developer or property owner in addition to the
above charge.
Section 18.300 Conditional Use Permit Fee.
Suggested fee: $50.00 to cover the cost of publication, etc.
Section 21.502 Amendment Fee.
Suggested fee: $100.00 to cover cost of publication and hearings.
41 Section 19.300 Variance Fee.
Suggested fee: $100.00 to cover hearing costs and cost of
legal publication.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCI L OF THE TOWN. OF VAI L
SEPTEM2ER 18, 1973
i
t
0
Convene as the Town Council
1. First reading of Ordinance No. 17; An Ordinance ratifying and
approving a settlement in Civil Action No. 1958.
2. Second reading of Ordinance No. 15; an ordinance authorizing
municipal borrowing.
3. Second reading of Ordinance No. 16; supplemental expenditures
ordinance.
4. Appointment of two members to the Design Review Board.
5. Consideration of minutes of meetings of July 16 and August 21, 1973.
6. Question and answer period regarding the upcoming special election.
7. Presentation by Mr. Jim Peterson regarding the Regional Council
of Governments.
Convene as the Local, Liquor Licensing Authority
1. Consideration of a request for the expansion of the premises from
Riley Vail Corporation (The Slope).
TOWN OF VAI L REACHES SETTLEMENT
ON ANTHOLZ PROPERTY
The Town of Vail and Leavell-Manor Vail are pleased to announce an
out-of-court settlement regarding the Town's purchase of the Antholz.
property. The settlement culminates nearly a year of negotiations,
legal actions and efforts to reach a mutually-satisfactory agreement.
The final settlement, of course, is contingent upon voter approval of
the bond issue for the purchase on September 25, 1973.
The agreed purchase price for the 37.65 acre parcel of land is
$3,'165,000.00. The agreement provides for the transfer of develop-
mental data, such as surveys, soil and vegetation studies and
topographical maps.
The Vail resident will stilt be voting on a $3,000,000.00 acquisition
question on September 25. The additional revenues needed to acquire
the property can be generated through a slightly higher interest
premium on the subject bonds.
Some advantages to the public in an out-of-court settlement are that:
The Vail resident knows the exact purchase price prior
to casting his vote in the upcoming election;
There is substantially less threat of litigation following
a direct sale than following acquisition through condemnation;
Direct sale ownership results in fewer restrictions on future
use of the land;
There are possible significant savings on additional costs,
such as legal fees, court costs, and appraisal work;
The possibility of a much higher price in a condemnation award
is avoided;
The Town wilt have possession of the property in November if
the results of the special bond election are favorable.
0
s
NOR'T'HWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
September 5, 1973
TO: Eagle County Municipalities
SUBJECT: NWCCOG Representation
Eagle County is without a municipal vote on the Regional Council of
Governments. In order that the towns be properly represented at the
September 20 th meeting which will be held at the Eagle County Courthouse,
I would like to suggest the following approach to having a representative
designated.
Before September 19, each town council designate a COG representative
from its membership. These designees will then meet for lunch at 11:30 a.m.,
Sept. 19th at which time a voting representative will be selected to attend
the COG meetings and represent the Eagle County municipalities by voting.
A centrally located place to lunch would be Ruben's just EasL of Eagle.
This is a "one shot" meeting and understandably it might be difficult for
each town to attend. However, the importance of having an Eagle County
Municipal vote should not be underestimated and it can be taken care of
the 19th if each town attends .
To ensure we will not need to meet inconveniently again, I urge your
participation on the 19th.
The lunch will be by menu choice; however the bill will be taken care
of.
Sincerely,
Jim Peterson
Executive Director, NWCCOG
JP/jo
cc: Va it
Eagle
Gypsum
Minturn
Redcliff
Basalt
L I
l
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COU NCI L OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
OCTOBER 2, 1973
1. First reading of Ordinance No. 19; an ordinance providing for the
underwriting of the bonds for the acquisition of the Antholz property.
2. Second reading of Ordinance No. 17; an ordinance ratifying and
approving a settlement in Civil Action No. 1958.
3. First reading of Ordinance No. 18; an ordinance prohibiting certain
acts such as disturbing the peace, unlawful assembly and rioting.
4. First reading of Ordinance No. 20; an ordinance providing for
supplemental appropriations.
5. Discussion of proposed agreement with Vail Associates regarding
the acquisition of the main parking,lot.
6. Discussion of Town of Vail parking requirements.
7. Report from the Town Manager on the status of day care center proposal.
8. Presentation by Ms. Bosshart and Ms. King regarding sleigh operation.
RED LION SITE EXAMPLE
POSSIBLE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT UNDER NEW ZONING ORDINANCE
Lot Size - 13,360 square feet.
Setbacks -- None required -- any amount may be required by Design
Review Board.
Distance between buildings None required if there are no openings
None required by Zoning in walls adjacent to property lines.
Must be a minimum of 51 (Uniform Building
Code) if fire doors and 101 if windows
are used.
Height - Maximum 351 to highest point unless clock tower, etc.
Gross Residential Floor Area - Maximum .8:1.0 or.10,688 sq. ft.
Maximum commercial space: Assume maximum building size (1251 x 1001)
three stories high = 37,500 -loss gross residential = 26,812.
Maximum commercial is not possible, however, because of the require-
ment for useable open space below.
Total site coverage allowed is 90% or 12,024 square feet. Again
this-is not possible because of the Useable open space requirement.
Assume that the 10,688 sq, ft. of gross residential floor area is
divided into 30 lodge units of 345 sq. ft. each. Each lodge unit
requires 100 sq. ft. of useable open space or 3,000 sq. ft. One-
half of this must be at ground level or 1,500 sq. ft.
r
Therefore: Lot size .13,360
Minus Useable Open Space 1,500 Which also satisfies landscaping
requirement of 10%
11,860 absolute maximum size of each
floor.
At 11,860 sq. ft. per floor the total building would be 35,580 sq. ft.
Given the odd lot shape, however, this amount will not fit on lot.
Only 34,551 sq. ft. will fit on lot.
If Uniform Building Code setbacks from property line are considered,
the site will accommodate only 27,819 sq. ft. This would require
a 101 front setback to allow a front door and 101 side setbacks to
allow windows other than wire glass.
Maximum according to zoning ordinance shown in red
Maximum according to Uniform building Code in conjunction with
zoning shown in green.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
OCTOBER 16, 1973
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
1. Consideration of a request for a 3.2% malt beverage license from
Daniel Ellis O'Brien.
Convene as the Town Council
1 . Second reading of Ordinance No. 18, an ordinance prohibiting certain
acts such as disturbing the peace.
2. Order for re-publication of Ordinance No. 19.
3. Second reading of Ordinance No. 20, supplemental appropriations
ordinance.
4. Appointment of the judges and clerks for the November 20 Council
election.
5. Consideration of minutes of September 4 and September 18, 1973.
6. Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit for a coin-
operated laundry from Levis W. Pennock.
0
0
SALARIES 1973
Colorado Springs
Lakewood
Pueblo
Aurora
Bou Wer
Eng lewood
Grand Junction
Loveland
Glenwood Springs
Aspen
Steamboat
Mayor
0 per month
500
125
350
O
200
125
50
100
100
75
0
Councilmen
O per month
250
100
250
0
100
100
40
75
75
50
9
FORM 984 C.T.-REV. 1965 CITY ELECTIONS CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES AND CLIERKS Or ELECTION.
Y-R -? FOR USE IN CITIES AND jWS WHERE VOTING MACHINES ARE NOT USED.-HpsCKeL CO.. DENVER' 27217
t -
1 11th is to lardirLIl That the following have been appointed by the.------------.. ._ ..................
r Town Council the_.------ ,_. Town of Vail
_
................ ......•--•----- -------
(Governing body) (City or Town of) -
to serve as Judges of Election:
Name ......... Sara_Carton Address. ZZ39d- And- Q1:1-.-Rao'd----------.
Name-..__--Kathleen K Eug....-•......._ _._. ....... ...^. Address_.__Lionshe:ad Lodge
Name-----.Eve Nott •_.-m-_ Address ---- Spring Hill Lane... _...........
.
•------------------------•-...--------------...----- --- - -- •.........
That the following have been appointed to serve as:
Alternate Judges of Election:
Name--......E3arbal^ift..HQA -------- .............................. . Address --•---•--- ...........
Name----Sharon Welin Addrese_.___ _._.904 W. Red Sandstone Circle
William Wilto 885 Red Sandstone Road
Name --- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Address...------- --------------- ---------•- ....................... -•--------
That the following have been appointed to serve as:
Clerks of Election
Name-_ _.- Marjorie Alm4r? i ............................ Address------9 Q.R d__ ai?dstnr?e_ tr .....
Name----...Sandra Mills _,_ Address__. __ 900- Red Sandstone Circle
-------•...... ----------------- •--------- --------------------- ---•--. ---------------- ----------------- --....--•-----------.....
That the following have been appointed to serve as:
Alternate Clerks of Election
Name. ..-..David Cole .......... .. -. Address -....... 518- Lionshead Circle South
------ - ---------------
Name-----..Martha Fl UKIe,n ....................................... Address ...... ._.C,nrp..C
. x "4<.-Elr4w?e ---------------------
in Precinct No ....................... in the........ -.............. ....Ward (or District), in the. ----------- ......................................
of........................................................
?......?... ,.
Also to Certify That the appointment of all of the above has been made in all respects in accord-
ance with the provisions of the Colorado Municipal Election Code of 1965.
to Witness Whereof, I .................... ............ ---•--------•-•------------ ....................---•--.--•----•
City
Clerk of the Towns of ........ .......... _...... _................... ..--._., in the State of Colorado,
have hereunto set my hand and official seal, this..... ...........................................................
day of----•--•-----------•----...--------------------- A. D. 19.._•--..----
----__ ......... ....................................... ..--- ---- ---- --------...............Clerk.
City or Town.
Under the law you hold this office until the next Municipal election or until your successor is duly
appointed.
" ...... _.._...---- -....... Judge of Election is to call in person at
Clerk's office on Monday the.--..-. ..................... day of ----------------------------------------- 19--........ the day before Election
to pick up the Election and Registration supplies.
*The Clerk will deliver the Election and Registration supplies to ..................................................................
Judge of Election on Monday the ............................day of ....... _............... ..................... 19 .......... the day before
Election. Judges and Clerks are required to meet at .r .....................................................................in said Precinct
on Tuesday, the ..................... •.................................... , 19 ........ the day of Election, before 7:00 o'clock A. M.,
and qualify as such Judges and Clerks of Election as the law provides.
Clerk should make extra copy for filing in his office.
*Strike according to fact
VAIL MUNICSP.AL COURT
September 1973
DOCKET DEFENDANT
0 142 Elvin C.-Bland
150 Terry Van Schwartz
205 Ila Buckley
208 Jeffrey Houston
210 Steve Ruder
220 Maccie Carmony
223 Gregory Franson
224 Jay Portice
225 Robert A. White
232 Mary C. Budler
236 Ralph Sloan
245 Ross Davis
246 Daniel Sargent
247 Craig Tolboe
248 Peter Runyon
250 Richard Spillman
252 Calvin M. Grandy
0253 Dirk Huesken
256 Manuel. Serna
257 Roger Birks
260 Susan Brenden
CHARGE & DISPOSITION
Indecent Exposure -- Pending
Failure to Appear -- Pending
No.Safety Inspection - Pending
Failure to Appear -- Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking -- Pending
Parking in Fire Lane -Guilty
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking -- Guilty
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty
Speeding - Pending
Speeding - Pending
Failure to Appear Pending
No Safety Helmet - Pending
No Safety Helmet - Pending
Disobeyed Stop Sign -- Guilty
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
Speeding - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Illegal Parking - Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Dismissed
Careless Driving - Pending
Assault - Pending
Illegal Parking - Dismissed
RECEIPTS
$10.00
$ 3.00
$ 3.00
$20.00
. September 1973 -
DOCKET DEFENDANT CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
261 John Atkins Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 8.00
262 Devon Owens Illegal Parking - Dismissed
263 Eve Elias Dog-at-Large -- Pending
264 Rodney Cain Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 6.00
265 Pepper Etters Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty $ 8.00
(Receipts deposited with the
Town on 9-24-73)
266 Sharon A. Robar Illegal. Parking -- Pending
270 David M. Coe Disturbing the Peace - Guilty $30.00
271 'Hans Oberlohr Illegal Parking -Dismissed
272 Charles White Illegal Parking - Guilty $ 8.00
273 Manuel Pacheco Disturbing the Peace -- Pending
274 Guy T. Teeple Drove through Barricades without
Authorization - Pending
275 Jane Foster Careless Driving - Pending
276 Nick Benyo Dog Disturbance - Pending
Vaccination and Licensing
Required - Pending
277 Steven Roberts Theft under $100 - Dismissed
To be refiled in County court
278 Dale Eggers Careless Driving - Guilty $20.00
279 Jeffrey Pesola Parking in Emergency Zone
- Pending
280 Robert Dugan Illegal Parking - Pending
281 David B. Stevenson Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty $10.00
282 David P. Gentholts Malicious Injury to Property
- Dismissed
To be refiled in County Court
283 William S. Johnson Speeding - Dismissed
284 Douglass Earl Funk Wrong Way on One-Way - Guilty $15.00
Failure to Appear -- Dismissed
R
DOCKET DEFENDANT
285 Richard DeJong
285 Steven Hathaway
287 Ellen Jacobson
288 Mark Burton Quinby
289 Robert E. Grady
U C".N 4GallN ?.a.. -+.? +.? v
CHARGE & DISP#TION
Driving through Safety Zone
for Pedestrians -- Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Disobeyed Stop Sign -- Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Illegal Parking Guilty
Resisting an Officer - Pending
Drunk & Disorderly -- Pending
Resisting an Officer -- Pending
Drunk & Disorderly -- Pending
RECEIPTS
$ 3.00
Total receipts for September 1973 are $144.00. $8.00 was deposited
with f'he Town by the Police Department on September 24, 1973. The
remaining $136.00 is enclosed with this report and is broken down
as follows:
Traffic Fines: $71.00
Other Fines: $25.00
Court Costs: $40.00
TOTAL $136.00
•
•
Catherine S. Cheney, Clerk
• i
•
box l oo • Vail, colorado 81657 • 303. 476.56 7 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION
RE: L,EVIS PENNOCK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1973
The Planning Commission has reviewed in two separate
meetings the proposal by Mr. Pennock for installing a
coin-operated laundry in the basement of the Vail 21
Building at LionsHead.
Mr. Pennock has complied with all zoning and parking
requirements for the Town of Vail and the Building
Department has passed favorably on all technical aspects
of his project.
With this information in hand, the Planning Commission
could find no problems with the proposal and recommends
to the Council that the Conditional Use Permit be granted.
ti
. 0 i 3,11
Aj
box i00 • Ya14, cotorado si657 • 303.476-5613
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HE-ARSNG
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TFIAT Levis W. Pennock has applied for a
Conditional. Use Permit in accordance with Articl-e 18,. Section
18.400 cif Ordinance 8 (Series of 1973) in order tb construct a
coin-operated laundry in the Vail 21 building located on a
Part of 'Site B, Vail. Lionshead First Filing. #
A'Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section 21.400. ?
of Ordinance No. 8 (Series of 1973) on (??tnhPr l i 071, at 2:00
p.m. in the Vail Municipal Building. Said Conditional Use Permit.
application will be heard before the Town of Vail •Plat nix ffl- s
Cbmmissioki and findings will be transmitted to the Town Council
for the Town of Vail.
'OWN F, V•AI L ?... . .
Diana S. Toughill
Zoning Administrator j ?, ....,. s
c
APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE
THE TOWN COUN AND/OR VAI L PLANNING COI SS I ON .?
' /AV i cation Date
pP?LE?bQh??1
ti? - ..
Hearin Date / 17 Hearin Fee ?•c".," F
9 9
I - -f
I (we) of?
(Applicant (Address)
\t.4[,4.L Phone 47ire zz
'(State) (City)
hereby reque-st'permission to. appear before the Town Council and/or Val.1
anning Commission to request the following:
E ? Zoning-Change from 'to
E ) Parking Variance (p?!??is?-??QL C? vr? ,j
( ?) Conditional Use Permit to al low
in C t?Ju ? (2 A Zone.
For the following described 'property: Lot 7VCC- Block
FI I'inq Numbei" Fie< t?;?rP7>
Ordinance and Sections being appealed: Ordinance , Series
of Section(s)
Clearly state purpose and intent of this- application'. T? {?lliiE'S
4e`
?
h, -.7z
What do you feel is the basis for hardship in this case?
. S: gna'ture or App I i cani-
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Form must be submitted in triplicate, and all copies must be signed.
A plat,map•'drawn •in triplicate to a scale of not less than 200 feet to
the inch showing the land in ques'icn. its location, the length and
direction of each boundary thereof, 'f',e location and existing use of
all. buildings on such land and the principal use of all properties within
300 feet of such land. if the application is for a parking variance,
show parking provided, drawn to scab and numbered to indicate the
spaces.-
3. The names and addresses of the owners Of all Properties within 300 foot
of any part of the land included in "0 VfQvosed variance.
4. Al I Information required by the SQbdi vision R090lations for preliminary
plats where.applicable.
5. The-Town Council and/or the Plann63 Cc"*%ission wlII set a hearing
?...-
nn+ mnra than th i rtV (30) the f etttara,.+ rhAn::cs.
,.M
.?nao 7.nizn.?so?rn nRivr
I.I"TTL?TO+`j, COIAItA?? ff01?u
_Ijl-?7 -3
?v
1-112
/471
4
WA
/7Z71
JJ t? ? rr?
0
Harrison F. Kepner
252 West Meadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
0
October 5, 1973
Mr. Terrell J. Minger
Town Manager
Town of Vail
Vail Municipal Building
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Minger:
Will you please present the attached letter to the Mayor and
Councilmen at the next council meeting, and request that it be
read and made a part of your formal minutes.
0 Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
H. F. K ner
HFK:cm
Enc.
E
•
r.
Harrison F. Kepner
252 West Meadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
0 October 5, 1973
Honorable Town Councilmen
Town of Vail
Vail Municipal Building
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gentlemen:
One of the owners of Lot #10, Vail Village 2nd
written property owners in the area requesting
approval for a change in the town covenants to
use of their lot, presently zoned residential.
This action has greatly concerned many of us a
not only adversely affect the enjoyment of our
Filing, has
their written
allow commercial
s we feel it will
own property,
but believe it is in conflict with our community's environmental,
growth, and density concerns.
We built our nice home in this area because of the protective
zoning, and with the belief it would be maintained. The increased
traffic in the area is already of concern, and to allow a com--
mercial building across the street would seriously increase the
traffic problem, and set a precedent away from the type of
community we are all endeavoring to create.
And from my attendance at your council meetings, following pro-
motion of the Master Plan and recent bond issue, T believe you
probably feel the same way, and would ordinarily not consider _a
zoning change in this area.
But this is not an ordinary situation, as the owner requesting
this action is a good friend and fellow councilman. And we all
know what he has done in the community, and of his excellent
professional care of our family members.
But this is strictly a business matter, not an emotional one,
and an objective viewpoint is necessary.
So although most all of us with residential property in the area
are good friends with the people involved, we cannot go along
with this change for their business interest, and I have
personally discussed this with them.
Town of
Page 2
October
•
•
Vaal
5, 1973
0
Further, I have been in contact with many of the property owners
in the area and 34 residents have actually written of their
concern, 33 of whom are against changing the zoning. These
signed statements and letters are available to you on request.
it is my understanding that the council has not yet received the
formal request to initiate zoning change procedures in this
regard, but the purpose of this letter is to advise you in
advance of the feelings of the area residents, many of whom do
not reside in Vail full-time, but are nevertheless owners vitally
interested in maintaining an attractive - liveable community.
Thank you for your considerations. Your adoption of the Vail
Master Plan is commendable and congratulations on the over-
whelming support of the bond issue.
HFK;cm
Sincerely,
H. F. Kep er
0
+ MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAI L
MARCH 135 1973
A work session of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
2:15 p. m., March 13, 1973, in the Conference Room of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Stan Bernstein, Finance Director
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Discussion centered on the various items which might be included in a bond
issue. The three elements could be the transportation center and structure,
the Antholz property and the amenities needed to make best use of that
property. It was noted that if any of the parking structure is to be built
by the end of the summer, a decision must be reached by May 15. Addi-
tional points of discussion were; 1 . whether the parking structure is
integrally tied to a further pedestrian concept; 2. whether it would be
wise to have several bond' issues or only one or two, 3. whether it is
necessary to decide in advance if delivery vehicles are to be eliminated,
at some' point, from the core in order to properly design the parking structure.
Mayor Dobson suggested that the transportation solution be viewed in stages-
I . the provision of public parking facilities; 2. the elimination of trucks
From the core; 3. the elimination of private parking spaces in the. core.
The Mayor also suggested that rather than attempt to build the parking
portion of the structure this summer an attempt should be made to build
the transportation terminal portion. This would open the way to work on
transportation systems next year. There was general agreement with this
suggestion.
Mr. Rose reported that, in regard to the bus system for the valley, Vail
Associates has requested thatthe Town purchase 3 of their buses; they
will use the money thus obtained to purchase buses for the outside-of-town
routes. Mr. Lamont noted that apparently no one has approached Mr. Weibel
in regard to buying his P.U.C, license. There was general agreement that .
it would not be a wise idea to purchase these buses.
Councilman White suggested that work be started immediately on a bond issue
to include the Antholz property, the transportation center and the needed buses
for the transportation system. After some discussion, it was determined that
the Antholz property and transportation terminal would cost appnpximately
7.5 million. An amount this substantial would probably require'an additional
cent sales tax. Although the parking structure might generate enough revenues
to be self-supporting, this is not certain at present. If there is a charge, it
is anticipated that it might be $1.50 per day. There was general agreement
that the additional sales tax should be voted on at the same time as the bond
issue.
In regard to work anticipated for this summer, Mr. Minger noted that some
bike paths will be constructed, general landscaping done, the plaza by
Gasthof Gramshammer completed and re-paving done in the core. The
monies for these projects are already available.
•
•
After some further discussion, the staff was instructed to prepare a resolu-
tion calling for an 8 million dollar bond election on April 24. This resolution
would be introduced at the meeting on March 20. There was general agree-
ment that Dan Herrington should be contacted to act as the fiscal agent. Mr.
Ream will be contacted as to the feasibility of completing the transportation
terminal portion this summer.
In regard to the proposed recreational fee, Councilman Staufer suggested
that $1 .00 per square foot of floor area was too high a charge. Discussion
ensued of various proposals for the several elements necessary to implement
such a fee. Agreement was reached on the following points: 1. in MF and
R zones, the fee will be 25 cents per squat4e foot; 2. in shop spaces, the
fee will be 50 cents per square foot; 3. in all other areas, the fee will be
75 cents per square foot; 4. public service facilities will be excluded, such
as clinics, chapels, etc.; 5. no credits will be given; and 6. the time of
assessment will be at the point the building permit_,is issued. From that
time, the developer will have 120 days in which to pay the fee. However,
no occupancy or sales will be allowed` before the fee is paid.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
Town Clerk
Page 2
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
JUNE 26, 1973
A work session of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
10:10 a.m., June 26, 1973, in the Conference Room. of the Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Mr. Minger reported that the Sunburst group has agreed to list the proposed
amenities very exactly; they would like to further discuss any credit arrange-
ments. There was general agreement that credits should be given only for
items which have a public rather than a private use and that credits should
be negotiated on a year-by-year basis. Councilman White added that the
amount they are to pay would be determined on a year-to-:.year basis also.
Mr. Minger noted that he was concerned that the number, location, year
of construction and performance standards of the amenities be specifically
set. It might not be necessary to include dollar amounts for these items if
performance standards could be rigidly determined.
Mr. Minger noted that the group has yet to submit the exhibits on surety bonds,
phasing and cost of amenities. The Council then discussed specific provisions
of the proposed agreement. A meeting was scheduled with the group represen-
tatives for 2:00 p.m. , June 27. After some further discussion, it was noted
that, in the future, the Council is obligated to treat all new construction in
this same, detailed fashion.
Mr. Robinson brought up the matter of the Rich condominium recreation fee.
There was::some discussion of possible precedents to be set in the matter.
Mr. Minger suggested that the touchstone should be the intention of the Council
at the time the letter of zoning guarantee was written. It was generally agreed
that it dealt specifically_with zoning as the matter of the recreation fee had
not yet been conceived. After some further discussion, the matter was tabled
pending the compilation of additional data.
In regard to the proposed parking structure, Mr. Minger reported that current
thinking is that it should contain 900 to 1,000 spaces. Such a reduction would
save $700,000 to $1,000,000. Mr. Bernstein explained the figures he had
compiled which led to this determination. There was some discussion of
additional uses for the structure, such as recreational uses on the roof.
Councilman Staufer inquired if Mr. Larese had been contacted in regard
to his building. Mr. Minger replied that he had. it was also noted that by
reducing the number of spaces, any crowding of adjacent property is lessened.
The current proposal does not include a delivery service or electric carts.
Mr. Bernstein explained that in order to purchase private parking spaces in
proposed pedestrian areas, it would cost a quarter of a million dollars; in
addition, capital costs would be $550,000 to $800,000. There was general
agreement that such a program was not currently workable. The only por-
tion currently workable is the re-signing of the streets to restrct.on-street
parking. One suggestion for the parking lot was that additional alternatives
to stairways be considered. Returning to the question of the Cornice Building
Mr. Minger noted that it will be appraised. Mr. Larese had suggested that
he would trade the property for the food concession in the structure; there
was general agreement this would not be a good idea.
• Mr. Minger reported that Vail Associates is willing to deed the land to the
+ Town on two conditions: 1 . that 350 spaces be available For the day skier;
and 2. that 20 free parking spaces be reserved for Vail Associates. The
Council approved further negotiations with Vail Associates, but declined to
accept any restrictions such as free spaces for Vail Associates or the
granting of the right to V A, to approve fees . The reservation of 350 spaces
for day skiers met with Council approval.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1;30 p.m.
Town Clerk
i
0
'to -2-
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN. OF VAI L
JUNE 27, 1973
A work session of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
3:00 p. m. , June 27, 1973, in the Conference Room of the, Vail Municipal
Building.
Mayor John Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
John Donovan
Tom Steinberg
Also present were:
Terry Minger, Town Manager
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Josef Staufer
Gerry White
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Discussion centered on specific changes in the proposed P.U.D. permit for
Sunburst at Vail. In regard to possible road changes on the golf course road,
Mr. Rose noted that Mr. Slifer and Mr. Kindel of the Board of the Recrea-
tion District had indicated that they did not want a pedestrian/auto separation
on this road. It was noted that such a separation was not feasible from an
engineering standpoint. Councilman White suggested that a provision be
added that if such a separation were necessary in the future, the Sunburst
group would pay for it. There was general agreement with this suggestion.
In regard to the statement that the development would have no adverse impact
on public facilities, Mr. Robinson noted that this is required by the zoning
ordinance. Councilman White suggested that the statement be modified to
read: "as compared to existing zoning, will have a less adverse impact."
Mr. Minger suggested that the "as compared to ." be included but that
the remaining wording follow the zoning ordinance. There was general
agreement with this suggestion, if it met the approval of their legal counsel.
In regard to a transit system, Mr. Clancy presented an agreement to be signed
which would also be an exhibit to the permit. The only questions still remaining
would be solved when the final equipment selection was made. There was gen-
eral agreement that the transit system, agreement was acceptable.
Mr. Rose noted that he has the road profiles for the road across the golf course
and the design specifications for the bridge. Councilman Steinberg noted that
more information is needed on the landscaping. Mr. Clancy noted that the
information is not yet available. Councilman Steinberg suggested that perhaps
that information should be on file within 90 to 120 days. In regard to the
protective covenants, Mr. Jensen will dictate this information for the final
permit, if this is desired. Mr. Minger was concerned that the open space be
publicly accessible. Mr. Clancy stated that this was acceptable to him.
Mr. Clancy explained a series of maps showing the recreational amenities and
the phase at which they will be built. The credit allowances requested are still
negotiable. The guarantee for the amenities and landscaping could be in the
form of a letter of credit, submitted prior to the granting of a building permit.
A time could be established by which the precise list of amenities for that phase
should be installed. Mr. Clancy suggested that recreational amenities should
be completed by the first of July, 1974, for the first phase and landscaping
should be completed by the first of November, 1974, for this phase.
Mr. Minger asked if the Shamrock-Vail group would be willing to share the
costs of extraordinary work done on the project by the Town of Vail consultants.
Mr. Brady indicated that they would pay 50% of this cost, ot^$1,100.
N` There was general agreement that a permit, modified as suggested, would be
signed. As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m.
Town Clerk
A ? •
FJ
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.PERMIT
A permit to Shamrock-Vail, Ltd., a Colorado
Limited Partnership, hereafter "Permittee"
pursuant to an application for a planned
unit development submitted by Permittee on
June 1, 1973, on which a Public Hearing was
held on June 19, 1973, at which time such
planned unit development was approved subject
to the findings and conditions set out in
this permit.
WHEREAS, Permittee has filed an application for a planned
unit development pursuant to Article IV Section 4 of the Town of
Vail Zoning Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Town Council, meeting as a Design Review Board
on April 27, 1973, had approved the general design of the project,
and
WHEREAS the planned unit development application would per-
mit exceptions with respect to the set-back, building size, lot
size, and F.A.R. regulations in the existing zone districts, but
would require a fifteen per cent (15%) overall reduction in the
floor area ratio, and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on such application on
June 19, 1973, and the Town Council heard testimony from citizens,
Permittee, and members of the Council; and
.WHEREAS, at the conclusion of such Public Hearing Council
approved the application for a planned unit development, subject
to the findings and conditions set out herein,
NOW THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Vail grants
to Permittee, as set out below under Grant of Permit, a permit
for the development of the property described below as a planned
unit development, after making the following findings and on the
i
r.
r"
conditions set out herein.
1. FINDINGS
1. Application was made on June 1, 1973, by Permittee
for application for development of a tract of land under a
comprehensive scheme of development.
2. The application for a comprehensive scheme of develop-
ment, "PUD" was for a tract of land as described in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
3. The site meets the size and ownership requirements in
that it is all owned by Shamrock-Vail, Ltd., the Permittee, and
the tract exceeds two (2) acres in size.
4. The uses proposed for such planned unit development
are the same as the uses allowed in the present districts for
which the application is made, and such uses will be controlled
further pursuant to the use restrictions set out under the con-
ditions of this permit.
5. The floor area ratio for the tract as.a whole is hereby
reduced by fifteen per cent (15%) from the floor area ratio Jr P-4
- 1
-proms-Er-i.b_e L_for i,ndivi-dual -1-ots
? 'additional ?' T1?
cav ;ring "- +e trae Ro flo3o2rlarea ratio is allowed to
-Permittee for permanent public pedestrian use, such as arcades,
malls, 'or similar uses.
6. to Article IV, Section 4(b), of the Vail Zoning
Ordinance, ?(u,',rsuant
he1following additional findings are made:
The proposed development will not have
an undue o adverse impact on xisting public
facilities 'n t t the re reational and other
amenities, are suffi.ci t to insure that no un-
reasonable impact ill be 'ced on existing
1
-2-
i
i .
p u b I f-a-011mss,
(b) Reas9nablg enjoyment of neighboring
property will bE preserved since Permittee is
leaving oppr9ximately eighty per cent (80%) of
the area in gpen space, and development under
existing zoning could lead to an adverse im-
pact on neighboring property.
(c) Maintenance and ownership of open
space shall be protected by restrictive
covenants insuring the conservation and con-
tinuity of open space as set out herein un-
der Conditions:
(d) preservation of streams and stream
banks, wooded cover, and natural landscape
has been preserved in the development plan.
7. As compared to development under existing zoning, the
Council finds that the planned unit development will have a
beneficial effect upon sewage, public facilities, transportation,
and traffic (including the additional public transportation to
be provided under the planned unit development plan) and a more
subdued effect upon the existing landscape and surrounding property.
8. In addition to the above required findings under the
Vail Zoning Ordinance, the Council has considered the development
plan under the critorion set out in the proposed new zoning
ordinance for the flown of Vail, which is attached as a condition
to this permit and by which permittee. has.agreed to abide. With
respect to such criteria the Council finds as follows:
(a) Road System. An improved road across the
golf course, in accordance with the development
plan, should be submitted to•the Design Review.Ao.m---
3"
1 I?
mittee, which is established under Conditions be- tk
low, for final approval on access to golf course,
^q ?
landscaping, and pedestrian crossings.,,
?v
(b) Transit System. The transit system is
acceptable, subject to the financial security for r
construction of such amenities as set out under ~
Conditions below.
(c) Parking_. The parking plan, as revised
pursuant to the meeting with the Town Consultants
on dune 11, 1973, is acceptable, subject to final LQ'
review by the Design Review 'dommi-ttie,;-on the de-
tailed plans for phases subsequent to Building A.
(d) Adequacy of Open Space and Recreati'dhal
Facilities. Adequacy of open space and recrea-
tional facilities is in excess of that which is
usually provided in a project of this type and
is acceptable, however, the requirement under
Conditions for adequate financial security
that the facilities will be built must be met.
•
(e) Environmental Planninq,. Proper en-
vironmental planning, covering soil conditions,
-geology and stability analysis, existing plant ?y
?h
materials, drainage characteristics, hydrological i-A
investigation, avalanche conditions, rock fall
hazards, slope conditions, soil borings, air
pollution, and water pollution is found to be
acceptable.
9. Permittee submitted a development plan and supporting
documents, models, renderings, and other items as set out on
-4-
n
. 1
Exhibit "B". These submittals are accepted, and based upon them
the following are approved, subject to final approval by the De-
sign Review?"LL a for all phases subsequent to Building A.
(a) Contours, both existing and proposed,
for the development.
(b) Site plan showing buildings, landscaped
areas, recreation facilities, pedestrian plazas,
walkways, and service areas.
(c) The landscape plan.
(d) Preliminary building elevations, sections,
and floor plans, along with the proposed construction
materials.
(e) Transportation plan.
(f) The off-site improvements, subject to approval
J by the Design Review Committee of the exact location
and specifications on the golf course road and bridge.
II. GRANT OF PERMIT
1. Permittee is hereby granted a permit for a planned unit '
development pursuant to Vail Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section
q, including the.right to exceptions, as to set-back, building
size and lot size, and with respect to a transfer of.densities
under the floor area ratio, but not an increase in the floor area jjSS
tl .
ratio, all in accordance with the development plan. c? ? ???lll
2. The planned unit development plan is approved as shown
on the master plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated
herein by reference. The additional supplements to such master
plan as outlined on Exhibit "B", are adopted as part of the plan-
ned unit development and are incorporated herein by reference.
-5-
Y '
III. CONDITIONS
This permit is issued subject to the following conditions:
1. Permittee shall abide by the standards set out in the
proposed Special Development District One, the parking require-
ments set out therein, and a review by the Design Review Board.
These standards are set out in the attached Exhibit "D", which
is incorporated herein by reference.
2. The Design Review C _4V'it-e created as set out in
Exhibit "D" shall review all plans of the applicant in accord-
ance with the standards set out in Exhibit "D", but Building A,
on which construction is planned to begin immediately, shall
be deemed approved by this permit, as long as applicant submits,
at the time of its application for a building permit, the fol-
lowing:
(a) A finished grading-plan for Building A.
(b) A related landscape plan, showing
recreation elements, trails, earth work, planning,
and irrigation for Building A.
(c) A plan for the off-site improvements for
the entire tract, specifically providing for the
proposed improved golf course road.
0 (d) The parking plan for Building A.
3. Applicant shall submit for recording, restrictive
covenants either on the plat, or by separate legal. document,
which restrictive covenants shall provide that the open space
shown on the master plan, Exhibit OC", shall be preserved, which
covenants shall run with the land.
4. Prior to issuing a building permit for any building or
any other construction on the premises, Permittee shall submit a
letter of credit or surety bond, guaranteeing to the Town of Vail
-
i
1
the co struction of the recreational amenities and public facil-
ities/ o be completed for that phase according to the master plan.
The list of amenities which must be so guaranteed is attached
hereto as Exhibit "EZ.., which also sets out the phase during which
such amenity is to be bui
5. Permittee shall build, no later than Phase 4 or when
Building D is built, employee housing of forty-four thousand
(44,000)square feet ?ith,?ddequate provisions to be approved by
n'4=-- .
the Design Review Com ittat-) for continued use of such space for
employee housing.
6. Permittee shall submit, at the time of application for
• each building permit, a Fire Safety Report by the Fire Marshall
and an Utility Services Adequacy Report by th Town Engineer.
?,Applicant shall submit to the Design Review C which shall
pass upon the sufficiency thereof,.} a proposed Agreement between
Vail Metropolitan Recreation District, Permittee, Town, and the
Pulis Ranch, sufficient to provide for the exchange of land along
the golf course property in order to build the golf course road
as shown on the development plan, to provide adequate overflow
parking for the golf course parking lot, and access from the Sun-
burst Project to the parking lot.
Mayor.
Town Manager.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Attorney
9 -7-
T I
A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
A permit to Shamrock-Vail, Ltd. , a Colorado Limited
Partnership, hereafter "Permittee," pursuant to an
application for a planned unit development submitted by
Permittee on June 1, 1973, on which a Public Hearing
was held on June 19, 1973, at which time such planned
unit development was approved subject to the findings
and conditions set out in this permit.
WHEREAS, Permittee has filed an application for a planned unit
development pursuant to Article IV, Section 4 of the Town of Vail Zoning
Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Town Council, meeting as a Design Review Loard
on April 27, 1973, had approved the general design of the project, and
WHEREAS, the planned unit development application would permit
exceptions with respect to the set-back, building size, lot size, and F. A. R.
regulations in the existing zone districts, but would require a fifteen per
cent (15%) overall reduction in the floor area ratio, and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on such application on
June 19, 1973, and the Town Council heard testimony from citizens,
Permittee, and members of the Council, and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of such Public Hearing, Council
approved the application for a planned unit development, subject to the
findings and conditions set out herein,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Vail grants
to Permittee, as set out below under Grant of Permit, a permit for the
development of the property described below as a planned unit development,
after making the following findings and on the conditions set out herein.
1. FINDINGS
1 . Application was made on June 1 , 1973, by Permittee for applica-
tion for development of a tract of land under a comprehensive scheme of
development.
2. The application for a comprehensive scheme of development,
"P.U.D.," was for a tract of land as described in Exhibit "A," attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
3. The site meets the size and ownership requirements in that it
is all owned by Shamrock-Vail, Ltd., the Permittee, and the tract exceeds
two (2) acres in size.
4. The uses proposed for such planned unit development are the
same as the uses allowed in the present districts for which the application
is made, and such uses will be controlled further pursuant to the use restric-
tions set out under the conditions of this permit.
5. The allowable square footage for the tract as a whole is hereby
reduced by fifteen per cent (15%) from 862,200 square feet to 732,670 square
. feet. No additional floor.area ratio is allowed to Permittee for permanent
public pedestrian use, such as arcades, malls, or similar uses.
6. Pursuant to Article IV, Section 4 (b), of the Vail Zoning Ordinance,
(Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1969) the following additional findings are made:
(a) As compared to development under existing zoning,
the proposed development will not have an undue or adverse impact
on existing public facilities in that the recreational and other
amenities are sufficient to insure that no unreasonable impact
will be placed on existing public facilities.
(b)- Reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property
will be preserved since Permittee is leaving approximately
eighty per cent (80%) of the area in open space, and develop-
ment under existing zoning could lead to an adverse impact
on neighboring property.
(c) Maintenance and ownership of open space shall
be protected by restrictive covenants insuring the conser-
vation and continuity of open space as set out herein under
Conditions.
•
-2-
1 -
(d) Preservation of streams and stream banks,
wooded cover„ and natural landscape has been preserved
in the development plan.
7. As compared to development under existing zoning, the Council
finds that the planned unit development will have a less adverse effect
upon sewage, public facilities, transportation, and traffic (includ'ing the
additional public transportation to be provided under the planned unit
development plan) and a more subdued effect upon the existing landscape and
surrounding property.
S. In addition to the above required findings under the Vail Zoning
Ordinance, the Council has considered the development plan under the
criterion set out in the proposed new zoning ordinance for the Town of Vail,
which is attached as a condition to this permit and by which Permittee has
agreed to abide. With respect to such criteria, the Council finds as
follows:
(a) Road System. An improved road across the
golf course, in accordance with the development plan,
should be submitted to the Design Review Board, which
is established under Conditions below, for final approval
on access to golf course, landscaping, and pedestrian
crossings, which improvements will be at Permittee's
•
expense.
(b) Transit System. The transit system is
acceptable, subject to the financial security for construc-
tion of such amenities as set out under Conditions below.
(c) Parking. The parking plan, as revised
pursuant to the meeting with the Town Consultants on
June 113, 1973, is acceptable, subject to final review by
the Design Review Board, on the detailed plans for phases
subsequent to Building A.
•
-3-
f
(d) Adequacy of Open Space and Recreational
Facilities. Adequacy of open space and recreational
a
facilities is in excess of that which is usually provided
in a project of this type and is acceptable, however, the
requirement under Conditions for adequate financial security
that the facilities will be built must be met.
(e) Environmental Planning. Proper environmental
planning, covering soil conditions, giology and stability
analysis, existing plant materials, drainage characteristics,
hydrological investigation, avalanche conditions, rock fall
hazards, slope conditions, soil borings, air pollution, and
water pollution, has been done. Permittee agrees to abide
by the plans. Council finds the planning acceptable.
9. Permittee submitted a development plan and supporting documents,
models, renderings, and other items as set out on Exhibit "B." These
submittals are accepted, and based upon them the follotiing are approved,
subject to final approval by the Design Review Board for all phases
subsequent to Building A.
(a) Contours, both existing and proposed, for the
development.
(b) Site plan showing buildings, landscaped areas,
. recreation facilities, pedestrian plazas, walkways, and
service areas.
(c) The landscape plan.
(d) Preliminary building elevations, sections, and
floor plans, along with the proposed construction materials.
(e) Transportation plan.
(f) The off-site improvements, subject to approval
by the Design Review Board of the exact location and
specifications on the golf course road and bridge.
-4-
II. GRANT OF PERMIT
1. Permittee is hereby granted a permit for a planned unit develop-
0
ment pursuant to Vail Zoning Ordinance, Article.IV, Section 4, including the
right to exception, as to set--back, building size and lot size, and with
respect to a transfer of densities under the floor area ratio, per "Findings"
Paragraph 5, all in accordance with the development plan.
2. The planned unit development plan is approved as shown on the
•
master plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by
reference. The additional supplements to such master plan as outlined on
Exhibit "B," are adopted as part of the planned unit development and are
incorporated herein by reference.
III. CONDITIONS
This permit is issued- subject to the following conditions:
1. Permittee shall abide by the standards set out in the proposed
Special Development District One, the parking requirements set out therein,
and a review by the Design Review Board. These standards are set out in
the attached Exhibit "D," which is incorporated herein by reference.
2. The Design Review Board created as set out in Exhibit "D"
•
shall review all plans of the applicant in accordance with the standards set
out in Exhibit "D," but Building A, on which construction is planned to
begin immediately, shall be deemed approved by this permit, as long as
applicants submits, at the time of its application for a building permit, the
following:
(a) A finished grading plan for Building A.
(b) A related landscape plan, showing recreation
elements, trails, earth work, planning, and irrigation for
Building A.
(c) A plan for the off-site improvements for the
•
entire tract, specifically providing for the proposed improved
golf course road.
(d) The parking plan for Building A.
-5--
3. Applicant shall submit for recording, restrictive covenants
•
either on the plat, or by separate legal document, which restrictive
covenants shall provide approximately as follows:
except as shown on the approved development plan attached
hereto as Exhibit "C," no further subdivision or re-subdivision
of this tract shall be made, nor shall any improvement,
building, structure, or other construction of any type be
permitted outside the set-back lines except as shown on
Exhibit "C," nor shall any improvement, building, structure,
or other construction of any type be permitted in any of the
areas designated as open areas on the approved development
u
plan without the consent of Permittee and the Town Council
of the Town of Vail. These designated open areas will be
accessible to the public for their, use and enjoyment as well
as to the owners within the Permittee's development. These
covenants shall be binding upon Permittee, its successors and
assigns, shall not be personal to the Permittee, but shall run
with the land.
4. Prior to issuing a building permit for any building or any other
t
construction on the premises, Permittee shall submit a letter of credit or
recreational amenities and public facilities to be completed for that phase
surety bond, guaranteeing to the Town of Vail the construction of the
according to the master plan. The list of amenities which must be so
guaranteed is attached hereto as Exhibit "E," which also sets out the phase
during which such amenity is to be built. Permittee agrees to negotiate
with the Town Council each year as to the amount of recreation fee applicable
to the phase for that year.
5. Permittee shall build, no later than Phase 4 or when Building D
•
is built, employee housing of forty-four thousand (44, 000) square feet with
adequate provisions (to be approved by the Design Review Board) for continued
use of such space for employee housing.
-6-
in
6. Permittee shall submit, at the time of application for each
building permit, a Fire Safety Report. by the Fire Marshall and a Utility
Services Adequacy Report by the Town Engineer.
7. Applicant shall submit tothe Design Review Board, which shall
pass upon the sufficiency thereof, a proposed Agreement between Vail
Metropolitan Recreation District, Permittee, Town, and the Pulis Ranch,
sufficient to provide for the exchange of land along the golf course property
in order to build the golf course road as shown on the development plan,
to provide adequate overflow parking for the golf course parking lot, and
access from the Sunburst Project to the parking lot.
•
•
t
Mayor
Town Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Attorney
-7-
MINUTES
WORK SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
NOVEMBER 21, 1973
A work session of the newly-elected Town Council of the Town of Vaii
was convened at 9;10 a. m., November 21, 1973, in the Conference
Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
The following were present;
John Donovan
John Dobson
Kathleen K lug
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Linda Hall, Town Clerk, was also present.
First to be considered was the election of a new mayor for the
forthcoming two--year term. Councilman Donovan moved that Council-
man Dobson be elected Mayor; Counciimembers Donovan, Dobson,
Klug, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg and White voted in favor;
Councilman Dobson was elected Mayor for a two-year term.
It was next necessary to elect a Mayor Pro-tem. An informal
ballot was taken and Councilman White was elected Mayor
Pro-tem.
As there was no further business, the Town Council adjourned
at 9:15 a.,m.
4? 4M -4/ 1§"
Town Clerk
ti
4
MINUTES
STAFF REVIEW - SUNBURST AT VAIL
APRIL 185 1973
A staff review of the Sunburst at Vail project convened at 2:15 p.m.,
April 185 1973, in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Terrell. J. Minger, Town Manager and the following staff members were
present:
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant_
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Eldon Beck, Planning Consultant
Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator
Jerry Aldrich, Building Official
Jerry Seracuse, Joe Clancy, Jim Brady, and members of their
staff were also present..
The meeting was held preliminary to the Council review on April 19,
1973 at 9:00 a.m.
A series of slides was displayed which showed, among other things,
the original plans for 48-60 clustered units on'the west end of
the property. The slides relating to the transportation plan noted
that during the first five years buses would be used in this plan;
that starting from a peak load of one hundred during 1973, the capacity
would increase to one thousand in 1976; that starting from an interval.
of 7.5 minutes in 1973, the time between buses would be reduced to
two minutes in 1976; that to minimize auto use, valet parking, the
holding of keys, laading and unloading services, care for autos, the
quality of bus service, plus some disincentives such as the high cost
of removal, one way traffic patterns and the cost and difficulty of
parking in Vail could all be invoked. At the beginning of..this ser-
vice, it would be completely the responsibility of Sunburst and only
for their patrons; in the future, they were hopeful that some cooper-
ative arrangements could be made with the Town of Vail.
The evolution of the Sunburst central core development was traced by
a series of slides. The pools, shops and theaters for the central
plaza were described. The recreational facilities plan was explained.
The landscaping was described as.following the natural landscape of
the area. An exception to this rule will be the plaza areas, although
they will use native plants. Lists of the proposed plant materials
are available. It was noted that, in the future, it might be possible
to have recreational facilities that will serve people from areas
outside the project. Ten tennis courts are viewed as the maximum
number; otherwise, to much cut and fill is necessary, or too much
open space is used. The ice rink will be for recreational, as
opposed to competitive, skating and is anticipated to operate
year-around.
It was noted that the square footage in the buildings has been
re-distributed toward the rear of the buildings. The heights of
the proposed buildings are 6,7,812-9,and .5 stories. These measure-
ments are from the plaza level; the plaza is from 1 to 2 stories
high. The square footages were given as 558,000 in the central core
and 303,000 in the east end.
The slide show was completed and the models of the project displayed.
Perspectives of the two complexes had been prepared showing them from
different angles and distances. Mr. Seraeuse noted that the highest
point of the complex was one hundred feet above the site. However)
this could be considered in combination with the fact that the
relationship to the mountain might minimize the impact. They have
made an attempt to leave 84% of the site open, inclusive of the tops
of the plaza areas.
Staff review continued throughout the afternoon on specific points of
the project.
sdo Town Clerk
I-K
?` ,mss
ell- -
n
G
L44f W..
?s 4
? sus ?
ja?V
La
1
•
4
Goo
CA-e
? 'r`te ? ? ? • ??.
vy-
S '
00 s.?.
Aj)k ' "")-* 5
-?i
Ll
0.
t
U
n
r
r?
L
? . U E S t,? ap OVA ? ? uk. ? S -
C7
co?
mss ,
?.?- ...sue s+ ?•? • -
Lv?
r.A s ?nlS4 s mss w-?`?'
5 Col.-
F
cxri
r^Alk too-
t
Of
t A-t ve
44 v
f
•
Ll
^)- ?e ?? -•? 4::;b
` ° -rj3
•
•
r
E
-1 trt ?? p 5 4.16 4,4t.- ;f-? /
fi Nrj Y OtJ.
COV-?'
1L?-s L
3 . k? of It.
1 5°15- ?--?
VIA
,e o- e-o?
Y.
Y.
r -
{
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL AND PLANNING COMMISSICN
APRIL 19, 1973
A Design Review session was convened at 9:10 a.m., April 195 1973.,
in the Council Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Chairman Robert Clark and the following Planning Commission members
were present:
Jim Slevin
Jen Wright
Also present were:
. Terry Minger, Town Manager
Eldon Beck, Planning Consultant
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator
The meeting was held to review the proposed Sunburst at Vail project.
A slide show was presented by Jerry Seracuse: (refer to minutes of
Staff Review of April 18, 1973).' Mr. Rose noted that there is a
Colorado law preventing the use of trailers on buses for passenger
service. A representative of the project responded that they would
work around that somehow. It was noted that they have not yet decided
to what extent they will implement the disincentives to auto use that
are under their control.
Mr. Beck offered comments on behalf of the staff. He generally agreed
that the lower elements of the building mass were good; that the trans-
portation analysis was thorough and that underground parking is good.
The valet-parking idea is a good one; however, as it means that less
parking area is built, if not attended, provision would need to be
made for a larger area. Mr. Beck emphasized that even with valley-
wide transportation, the developer should handle the demand unique
to his project. He also suggested that the recreational facilities,
especially swimming pools, would be marginal to handle a population
of 2500 or over. A Sunburst representative noted that more private
pools might be considered. Mr. Beck suggested that it was necessary
to determine what open space has been gained in the project above
and beyond that which would occur as a result of natural hazards and
dedication agreements. Mr. Beck disagreed with the height and bulk of
the taller elements. He suggested that they should not exceed the
front buildings by more than three levels. In regard to employee
housing, Mr. Beck inquired how this status was to be maintained. Mr.
Seracuse replied that as they were not prime units, they would
logically bring a lower price. .
It was suggested that the lower the complex on the east end of the
site, the less the adverse effect on the pond would be. In a general
way, the impact of 2000 additional people on the community must be
considered; the impact on the golf course both in terms of number of
players and traffic must be noted. It is possible that the road
- 0 crossing the course will need to be widened and/or elevated. It is
further necessary to determine the status of a possible road crossing
the eastern end of the golf course. Mr. Beck suggested that it is
t
essential to be aware of the nature'of
projects contemplated. He recommended
be obtained regarding avalanche danger
trend that a municipality is liable if
hazardous areas. It will be necessary
the management of the project, whether
run as a hotel, for example. A report
is needed. Also needed are a report.on
support plan for the plaza design.
2
the Commercial Core-type
that an outside opinion
as there is a growing
they appr.ove.projects in
to thoroughly understand
lived in by the owners or
on fire protection problems
building materials and a
Mr. Beck recommended that basic approval be given for the concept,
pending some modifications. The detailed work can be continued
while beginning construction of the four story buildings this
summer. He stated that the new zoning ordinance will reduce
densities by approximately 300; it would be fair and improve the
appearance of the project, if the density were reduced by 161. The
differential of 14% would be given in recognition of the fact that
the project has been developed over a long.period of time and they
are trying to do a quality job. Mr. Seracuse responded that the
group does not yet know the point at which the proposed project is
reduced by too large an amount to enable them to finacially underr-
take it. There was a question as to how to measure the height. Mr.
Minger suggested that the height be determined by an averaging over
the sate; the average of the midpoint height on the four walls.
Returning to the question of the employee housing units, one of the
owners indicated that they were contemplating the sale of these units
to a large investor with a provision for use by employees. In discus-
sion of the impact of the increasing population on the skiing facili-
ties, one of the owners suggested that there would not be 2500 skiers.
Another representative noted that they had not projected'the daily
number of skiers, but had looked at a year-round situation and the
use of the on-site facilities. Councilman Donovan inquired what
they planned to do if two-.thirds of the people in their project skied.
A representative suggested that the number of people is a given quantity,
no matter how the property is developed.. Hence, they,had tried to
provide as many alternative activities as possible. The skiing, he
suggested, was a valley-wide problem. It was also suggested that the
valley will need a multi-level transportation system to service a
regional skiing complex. Mr. Manger interjected that the proposal
at the time of annexation had been for 400 to 600 units. With this
in mind, his concern became to prevent the project from.dominating
the Town. He also suggested that, politically, you cannot build an
eleven to twelve story building in Vail.
Mr. Seracuse explained various alternatives of lowering and tapering
that could be used to reduce the project. An estimate of the amount
of square footage removed by the methods was, given as 86,000 square
feet. Although the concern is population density, Mr. Clark suggested
that the Town has no way to control this; it can control square
footage, but not its division.
Mr. Minger explained that in order to do the project, a re-zoning and
a R.U.D. approach will be needed. He asked if the owners could
increase the density reduction from loo to 15--17%. Mr. Clancy ex-
plained his position as; they know they can handle a 10% reduction;
they know they cannot handle a 20% reduction; the point at which
one changes to the other, they do not know. He suggested that they
be given the number which the Council desires, and then they will
calculate the impact.
There was some further discussion of what the visual impact would be.
Mr. Beck emphasized that he did not th nk•that a 1.0,% reduction would
achieve what he thinks necessary. The owners suggested that an 11%
reduction be made, beyond that, they would prefer to look for an
architectural solution. As a-point of information, Councilman
Bailey inquired what they would do if the Council insisted on a
20% reduction. Mr. Clancy stated that they would then sell the
property in smaller pieces. Mr. Minger suggested that, in that case,.
the avalanche hazards, etc. would not allow as dispersed a development
3
as originally contemplated. The engineer for the group suggested
that certain avalanche control mechanisms could be used to make
portions of the property buildable. It.was suggested that the
40 Forest Service would have to approve these.
In further discussion, Councilman Staufer suggested that it was
necessary to obtain in writing. :an agreement to build the amenities.
Additional discussion of the height of the buildings brought out the
point that even with the removal of the two top floors, the buildings
would be eighty feet. Mr. Beck reiterated that he thought the correct
measurement would be for the rear buildings to be not more than three
stories higher than the front buildings. He also suggested.that 15%
would be the correct amount of reduction..
Councilman Donovan inquired.how the ,group was distinguishing between
MF 8 HDMF for the purposes of paying the recreation'fee. A repre-
sentative of the group noted that they were using the former zoning
for this purpose. Councilman Donovan suggested that it.might be
proper to assess the fee on the basis`of'.the actual building.
Mayor Dobson summarized that the.discus.sion was centering on a
proposal of a building height of no more than 60 feet and a density
reduction to 10 to 15%. Councilman Donovan moved that a 15%.reduc-
tion in density be required. He.also suggested that there be a max-
imum on the east end of 45 feet in height. At this point, Mr. Seracuse
. brought out the point that they cannot work without elevator penthouses
on top of the buildings. Councilman Bailey suggested that Mr.. Beck
continue to work with the group on the relationship of height to mass.
After some further discussion, Councilman Langmaid suggested that the
Council state that a 15% reduction should take place in density; the
Sunburst group can then do some calculations and get back to the
Council with ,a report on what the affects would be. Mr. Minger
suggested that height restrictions be added to this decision. He
also suggested that the Council would decide if the items lost as a
result of the additional 4% reduction were worth this reduction.
Councilman Donovan suggested that some consideration might also
be given for the reduction through the recreation fee.
Mr. Minger summarized the parameters within which a P..U..D. would
be framed as including a 15% reduction in density; a maximum height
of 60 feet on the central structure and 45 feet on the east structure.
In return for density reductions, it might be possible to negotiate
regarding the recreation fee and possibily,the transit system. Mr.
Seracuse thought the height limitations were a bit too restrictive;
Councilman Bailey suggested that they be plus or minus figures, keyed
to the height of each floor. The 15% reduction was specified as
. being 15% of the grow buildable square footage as defined by the old
zoning ordinance. This figure has been presented as being 86.2,200;
hence, 15% of this would be the amount of the reduction. No bed
figure is yet available; however, it is difficult to control the
number of beds that any one owner puts in his unit. Mayor Dobson
suggested that the intent of the Council is to have everything
reduced by a proportionate:15%. A representative of the Sunburst
group noted that they contemplate 668 units for the entire project.
Mayor Dobson suggested that the number of units to be reduced would
appear to be 100, in that case. A representative suggested that the
figure would be somewhat lower, as 15% of the project also includes
15% of the commercial space.
Mr. Minger noted that it is necessary to have the parcels surveyed. Mr.
Clancy suggested that an attempt be made to work out the details by
June 1 and the project be heard at the first meeting in June. In
the meantime, he suggested an agreement outlining the matters resolved at
this meeting. Mr. Robinson suggested that rather than an agreement,
a memorandum be prepared. Mr. Jensen, the attorney for the Sunburst
group, suggested that this memorandum outline design review approval.
Mr. Robinson noted that the process would be started for a hearing
for a.P.U.D. at the first meeting in June.
I `
LJ
4
Mr. Seracuse summarized the agreement as a 15% reduction in density and
a height restriction of 50 to 60 feet above plaza. Level., which corres-
ponds to three levels above the front buildings. Mr. Clancy added
that considerations on transportation and the recreation fee are also
possible. Mr. Rose noted that it is still necessary to work with.the
Recreation District Board on possible land exchanges. Mr. Beck:
stated that he will submit a list of items to be included in the
final agreement.
As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:45 p.m.
r
Town Clerk
•
•
sdo
I*
•
0
nn
Q
zo
0
Q
a
Vail Town Council.
City Hall
Vail, Colorado
April 1851973
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find supportive data that should accompany
the materials, models, renderings and site plan already sub-
mitted for the Sunburst Design Review Application. It
is anticipated that this material will be expanded and included
in an application for a planned unit development under Article
IV, Section 4, Vail Zoning Ordinance.
The following is included herein:
-Decision Priorities
-Ownership
-Zoning
u -Architectural
-Landscape
-Recreation
-Transportation
-Marketing
-Utilities
-Drainage
-Avalanche
-Fire Access
Respectfully Submitted,
Shamrock-Va 1 Ltd.
•
0
SHAMROCK-VAIL Ltd.
4/18/73
Items on design review approval
1. Zoning under PUD
A. PAR - density
B. CRPA - density
C. Height
D. Retail - multi-family residential mix
E. Useable open space
F. Building coverage
2. Architecture
A. Site plan
B. Building envelopes
C. ,Parking - number
D. Circulation
E. Materials
3. Landscape Concept
4. Recreational amenities
y A. Facilities
B. Pedestrian circulation
C. Program
5. Avalanche study
6. Transportation
A. Parking
B. Public transportation
7. Ownership
8. Drainage
9. Utilities
•
i
1:., & : N
Additional Items Included at Time of PUD Approval - June 1, 1973
for Phase I and II
1. Open area - dedication to the city
2 Architecture
.
A. Preliminary plat
B. Design Details on structures
C. Design details for amenities
C. Fire service and access
D. Circulation
3. Landscape details
4. Transportation definitive study
A. Parking Number
B. Public transportation (coordination with city)
5. Recreational amenities
A. (Recreational amenities fund
B. ,Trade off of Recreational District Lands for parking
!etc. and realignment of roads
C. Final site and design plans for recreational amenities
D. Municipal use of Multi-Media Center
b. Utilities - service availability letters
7. Drainage details
0
•
•
•
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18, 1973
OWNERSHIP
The property known as Sunburst is owned by a Colorado limited
partnership, Shamrock-Vail, Limited. The zoning for the
property presently allows for a total of 862,200 square feet
of building construction thereon. This figure, 862,200 square
feet, reflects the utilization of a one (1) acre tract retained
by'the previous owner, and is permissible under the existing
ordinances of the Town of Vail.
The owners have reguested that a trade of land,measuring
approximately 1.5 acres additional to Shamrock-Vail take place
between themselves and the Vail Municipal Recreational District.
The purpose of this trade is to reflect appropriate design and
volume characteristics for the road connecting Sunburst with
the municipal area to the West. Considerations for the proposed
trade would be in the form of access or parking spaces for
Recreation District patrons in lieu of any monetary transaction
between said Recreation District and Shamrock-Vail.
?J
•
t
0
ZONING
April 18,1973
The property is presently zoned as follows:
A. Approximately 18.85 acres is zoned Multi-
Family residential (Article III, Section 2,
Vail Zoning Ordinance).
B. Approximately 5.4 acres is zoned High Density
Multi-Family residential (Article II, Section
3, Vail Zoning Ordinance).
C. Approximately 12.54 acres is zoned Agricultural
(Article II, Section 8, Vail Zoning Ordinance).
D. Approximately 1.0 acre is zoned Residential
(Article II, Section 1, Vail Zoning Ordinance).
The buildings and parking structures, as shown, will cross the
present zone lot lines, requiring exceptions as to set-back
requirements. This clustering of the units, however, leaves
approximately 85% of the site as open space. The floor-area-ratio
for the site, as shown, is 0.82:1.0 under the existing zoning.
The gross residential floor-area is less than 45 square feet for
each one hundred square feet. of the site, as shown.
Under the present plan, not more than 20% of improved structures
will include professional and business offices, public facilities,
and resturants and bars or other retail space. Over 80% of the
improved structures will be multi-family housing, allowed under the
multi-family zone district. Parking will exceed present requirements by
providing 1z spaces for each residential dwelling unit and at least
1 space for each 200 sq. ft. of retail or office space. To
accomplish this a single zone lot or PUD is anticipated under either
the proposed zoning ordinance or the existing ordinance.
C
•
•
fill
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18, 1973
ARCHITECTURAL' DESIGN
The Sunburst project is designed to acheive the following
design concepts:
To concentrate a variety of uses that are usually dispersed
in order to create a village atmosphere centered around a
central plaza, creating the greatest convenience, access, and
excitement for pedestrians, and at the same time affecting
the minimum amount of natural landscape, and allowing that
landscape to dominate the site from golf course to forested
hillside.
To create a sense of varying intimate human scales related to
the landscape rather than the visual "sea of asphalt" automobile
orientation.
To locate parking under the building complex, giving protection
from weather, convenience and security, but more importantly,
hiding the cars from view of either residents or passerbys, so
that the natural landscape and'architecture remain the predominant
theme.
To develop an architectural form that was dictated by the
natural topography, views, 'site constraints such as soils,
drainage, snow slides, natural vegation and site configuration.
The complex was designed with sloping terraced facades which
not only relate to the mountain slope, but also allows the maxi-
mum sunlight to penetrate the plaza areas, both in the summer and
winter. The terraces or balconies allow commanding views of, and
orientations to the mountains and plazas below.
To create not only buildings, but spaces between buildings,
plazas, and courtyards,trying to maxmize views, wind protection,
andalso create "activity" spaces that are usable and exciting
day and night.
To use building materials that are natural in chaacter and blend
in with the predominant deep green and reddish brown character of
the valley.
-roughsawn wood
-stone
-textured concrete
-earth toned stucco
-tinted glass
0
gy easing the
of sunlight
landscape to
the reflection
toned materials, the natural
gthe v
more nature deep
w alley.
ed, therefore a 1awof
illbe minimz ant feature
?,emain the predom?n
•
•
Sunburst Condominiums at Vail
April 17, 1973
Plaza Program
PLAZA IDENTITY THEMES
1. Hotel/Condhotel area for service type shops, outdoor dining, and other
uses related to the transient visitor.
2. Specialized boutique/bazaar shopping area with wide variety of "interest
areas", sitting, informal gathering spots with extensive plantings and
other features.
3. Recreation areas oriented to multi-media center and clubhouse activities.
4. Transition areas for circulation and buffer zones between differing uses.
PLAZA ACTIVITY THEMES
Important program activities between hotel, shop owners, recreation at multi-
media and clubhouse, and condominium owners.
1. Shop sales and sidewalk sales
2. Recreation programs
3. Art shows
4. Craft fairs
5. Lectures, meetings and conventions
PLAZA "HARD" LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
1. Indigenous use of native stones, wood and other color, textures, etc.,
to harmonize with Vail Valley environment.
2. Paving patterns of native stones, aggregates, concrete and paver units.
3. Major paving pattern to provide linkage to all areas and for fire
equipment; minor paving surfaces to define smaller areas, courts, ice rink,
and other specialized uses.
PLAZA FURNITURE
1. Comfortable seating with backs for private sitting and small informal
gathering areas.
2. Lighting program by ground level and overhead fixtures to make plaza areas
inviting at night as well as during the day. Lighting fixtures designed
so that source•is not seen, especially by residents of hotel and
condominiums, and yet the area is lighted.
3. Art/Sculpture program from local and other Colorado artists for plaza
sculptures, murals, and graphics program.
4. Water features with pools, cascading falls, bubbly runs with native
Colorado trout.
5. Kiosks, boards, and other signage for orientation, direction, information,
announcements, etc.
6. Drinking fountains, vast receptacles, tables, bicycle racks, ski storage, etc.
7. Ice sculptures during winter carnivals.
8. Small vendor locations for snacks, reading materials and other items.
PLAZA PLANTING ,
Refer to "urbanized plantings within plazas" for program statement of planting
theme and plant materials. Ali planting areas within Sunburst plaza will have
sufficient soil and depth for root growth of selected plant materials. The soli
will be imported to planting wells and sunken tubs. Watering and fertilizing will
bb by automatic irrigation systems.
Sunburst Condominiums at Vail
April 17, 1973
Site Landscape Concept Program
EXISTING ASPEN GROVE
This area contains the single most dominant landscape feature on the Sunburst
site, Plant materials found here are almost pure stands of aspen (sub-climax
community as a result of fire or avalanche) with some evergreens of lodgepole
pine and Douglas fir. An accurate inventory of shrubs, herbs, grasses and
wildflowers will be made in the spring. The concept for site utilization and
planting in this area is for minimal amount of disturbance to the existing plants
and soils. Any areas that are disturbed will be restored in planting, grades and
soil conditions as the existing natural areas. A plant list, "Montane Zone Plant
Materials," gives a complete listing of probable plant species found in this
vegetative community. Plants from this list will be used in any necessary
restorative operations.
"NATURALIZED" PLANT114GS OF ASPEN AND SOME CONIFERS
Site development of the Sunburst site will require additional plantings for
screening, buffers, windbreaks, shade and other uses. The basic concept of
"naturalized" plantings will be the continuation of the aspen groves into these
areas. Aspen, scattered conifers, shrubs, native grasses and wildflowers as
listed under "Montane Zone Plant Materials" will be utilized. The overall result
w.i11 be a blending of similar plant materials for the entire site that are
compatible with the scale, quality and character of the regional landscape.
EXISTING AND "NATURALIZED" PLANTINGS OF GRASSES AND WILDFLOWERS
The second most dominant plant material of the Sunburst site is large,
relatively open areas of grasslands and wildflowers. Again, a retention of
these grasslands or meadows will be the theme for Sunburst when fully developed.
Any meadow areas disturbed by construction or by site development will be restored
to its original appearance by hydro-seeding with native type grasses and wildflowers.
URBANIZED PLANTINGS WITHIN PLAZAS
Plaza development within the Sunburst Condominiums will require intensive
planting designs for the varied activities, and micro-climatics due to exposure,
watering, temperature, wind and other factors associated with man-made environments.
The theme for the plaza area is the use of plant materials that are harmonious in
scale, form, color, shape and texture of indigenous plants of the Vail region and
other mountainous regions of Colorado. Because of the specific requirements of
plant growth that may be required within the plaza, a much larger palette of plant
materials will be required. Therefore a second plant materials list has been
prepared which includes plants commonly found in the nursery trade and others that
may have to be collected. Again, the final theme is the use of plantings that are
harmonious with the mountainous environment of Vail and are not alien or exotic.
Sunburst Condominiums at Vail
• April 15, 1972
Montane Zone Plant Materials
0 Native Plant Indicators of the Region
- Major Trees
Abies concoior - White Fir Dominant in Upper
Abies lasiocarpa - Alpine Fir Elevation Regions
Pseudotsuga taxifolia (Menziesii) - Douglas Fir - Climax Species
Pinus contorta latifolia - Lodgepole Pine Sub-Climax Species
Populus tremuioides - Aspen
- Some stream areas may have (but not necessarily in distinct stands on
Sunburst site):
Alnus tenuifolia - Thinleaf Alder
Betula occidentalis - Water Birch
Picea pungens - Colorado Blue Spruce
Populus tremuioides - Aspen
Salix species - Willows
- Shrubs
Juniperus communis - Low Juniper
Ribes cereum - Squaw Current
Ribes inerme - Mountain Gooseberry
Rubus deliciosus Thimbleberry
Complete listing of native plants commonly associated in the Montane Zone
Trees
Abies concoior - White Fit-
Acer glabrum - Rocky Mountain Maple
Alnus tenuifolia - Thinleaf Alder
Betula fontinalis - Water Birch
Betula occidentalis - Water Birch
Picea pungens - Blue Spruce
Pinus contorta laxifolia - Lodgepoie Pine
Populus angustifolia - Narrowleaf Cottonwood
Populus balsamifera - Balsam Poplar
Populus tremuloides - Quaking Aspen
Prunus pennsylvanica - Pin Cherry
Pseudotsuga taxifolia - Douglas Fir
Salix species - Willows
Shrubs
Betula glandulosa - Bog Birch
Chimaphilia umbellata - Pipsissewa
Clematis pseudoalpina - Rocky Mountain Clematis
Cornus stolonifera - Red Osier Dogwood
Juniperus communis - Low Juniper
Linnaea borealis - American Twinflower
L•onicera involucrata - Twinberry Honeysuckle
Menziesia ferruginea - Rusty Menziesia
Sunburst Condominiums at Vail
April 15, 1973
Montane Zone Plant Materials
Page 2
Shrubs (Continued)
Pachystima myrsinites - Myrtle Pachystima
Physocarpus monogynus Mountain Ninebark
Prunus virginiana - Western Chokecherry
Rhododendron albiflorum - White-Flowered Azalea
Ribes cereum - Wax Currant
Ribes inerme - Whitestem Gooseberry
Ribes setosum - Redshoot Gooseberry
Ribes wolfii - Wolf's Currant
Rosa, sp. - Wild Rose
Rubus deliciosus - Thimbieberry
Rubus parviflorus - Salmonberry
Salix bebbiana - Bebb Willow
Salix caudata - Whiplash Willow
Salix monticola -- Mountain Willow
Salix scouleriana - Scouler Willow
Salix subcoerulea - Blue Willow
Salix wolfii - Wolf's Willow
Sambucus melanocarpa - Blackbead Elder
Sambucus pubens - Red-berried Elder
Shepherdia canadensis - Russet Buffaloberry
Sorbus scopolina - Western Mountain Ash
Symphoricarpos oreophylos ; Mountain Snowberry
Vaccinium caespitosum - Dwarf Blueberry
Vaccinium myrtillus - Myrtle Blueberry
Vaccinium scoparium - Broom Huckleberry
Viburnum pauciflorum - Mooseberry Viburnum
•
x Sunburst Condominiums at Vail
April 15, 1973
Plant Materials Suitable for Plaza Areas
EVERGREEN TREES
Abies concolor
Abies lasiocarpa .
Juniperus monosperma
Juniperus scopulorum
Picea englemanni
Picea pungens
Pinus aristata .
Pinus contorts 'latifolia'
Pinus edulis
Pinus flexilis
Pinus sylvestris
Pseudotsuga taxifolia
White Fir
Alpine Fir
Oneseed Juniper
Colorado Juniper
Englemann Spruce
Colorado Blue Spruce
Bristlecone Pine
Lodgepole Pine
Colorado Pinyon Pine
Limber Pine
Scotch Pine
Douglas Fir
DECIDUOUS TREES
Acer saccharinum Soft Maple
Celtis occidentalis Common Huckleberry
Elaegnus angustifolia Russian Olive
. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Gleditsia triacanthus lanceolate Green Ash
'inermis' Honey Locust
Populus acuminate Smoothbark Poplar
Populus angustifolia Narrowleaf Poplar
Populus balsamifera Balsam Poplar
Populus sargentii Plains Poplar
Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen
Sal ix (species) Willow
Ulmus americana American Elm
Ulmus pumi la Siberian Elm
SHRUBS
Acer glabrum y
Alnus tenuifolia
Amelanchier (species)
Arctostaphylos uva-ursi
Betula fontinalis
Betula glandulosa
Ceanothus fendleil
Ceanothus_velutinus
Ceanothus velutinus
Cercocarpus montanus
Corylls cornuta
Crataegus succulenta
•-Cornus stolonifera
Holodiscus dumosus
Jamesla americana
Rocky Mountain Maple
Thinleaf Alder
Se rviceberry
Bearberry Kinnikinnick
Water Birch
Bog Birch.
Fend 1 e rs Ce'anoth us
intermediate Ceanothus
Snowbrush Ceanothus
True Mountain Mahogany
Beaked Filbert
Colorado Hawthorn
Red Osier Dogwood
Bush Rockspirea
Cliff Jamesia
Sunburst Condominiums at Vail
• April 15, 1973
Plant Materials Suitable for Plaza Areas
Page 2
SHRUBS (continued)
Lonicera involucrata
Mahonia repens
Pachystima myrsinites
Physocarpus monogynus
Potentilla fruticosa
Prunus americana
.Prunus pennsylvanica
Prunus virginiana deimissa
Purshia tridentata
Quercus gambel i i
Rib.-es (species)
Ribes aureum
Ribes cereum
..Ribes i ne rme
Rhus glabra
Rhus trilobata
Rosa woodsii.
Rubus deliciosus
Rubus idaeus strigosus
Rubus parviflorus
Sal ix (species)
Salix subcoerulea
Salix purpurea
Sambucus microbotrys
..Shepherdia canadensis
.Sorbus scopulina
Symphoricarpus oreophilus
Viburnum pauciflorum
•
Bearberry Honeysuckle
Creeping Mahonia
Pachystima
Mountain Ninebark
Bush Cinquefoil
American Plum
Pin Cherry
Western Chokecherry
Antelope Bitterbrush
Scrub Oak
Wild Currants
Golden Currant
Wax Currant
Wild Gooseberry
Smooth Sumac
Skunkbush Sumac
Wild Rose
Boulder Raspberry
American Red Raspberry
Western Thimbleberry
Willow
Bluestem Willow
Dwarf Wi i lows
Bunchberry Elder
Russet Buffaloberry
Greenes Mountain Ash
Mountain Snowberry
Mooseberry Viburnum
•
•
•
°3 gC?r3-
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18, 1973
•
F_ r -I
L-J
RECREATION
-Programs for various age groups
-Active vs. passive activities
-Organized vs. non-organized activities
-Winter vs. summer scenarios
The proposed package of recreation and cultural amenities
is intended to provide a balenced program of opportunities
while considering the following factors:
Diversity is the word which seems to describe the recreation
inclinations of the American public in recent times. It is
important for this project to avoid the single-purpose
recreation syndrome identified with many resort areas, and to
provide a comprehensive program having appeal to a broad cross
-section of users.
It is anticipated that the hotel and condominium guests will
be seeking high-quality experiences during their visit; hence,
a program of superior facilities and programming will be provided.
The following profile anticipates a combination of personalized
recreation leadership and permanent facilities which will maximize
the efficiency with which recreation opportunities are offered.
t
REC. FACILITY
Oennis courts
Swimming pools
w/whirl pools
Glum House
Pool-Billiards
Table Tennis
Card Room
Arta -& Crafts
Lounge
Sauna/Steam
Exercise Room
'16andball/Racquet
Ball
Children's
Playgrounds
Ice Rinks
Paddle Tennis/
Badminton
Shuffleboard
Sled Run
Hiking - Cross
0 Country Ski Trails
Picnic Units
Bicycle Rental
QUAN.
10
2
1
2
2
2
6
4
1
24
1
SUNBURST - UAIL
RECREATION PROGRAM
DAILY USE
CAPACITY
396
1,300
470
72
300
600
180
160
200
Zoo-t-
20O
200+
WINTER USE (W) PEAK USE
SUMMER USE (S) PERIOD
BOTH (B)
S .,_
Summer none
B Winter. 4--6 pm
B. --
--
E;
0
S
S ..,.
W
S
W
S --
S
SUNBURST VAI L
Forecast of Recreation Demand (Non-Ski & Non-Golf)
Potential Recreation Visitations (non-Ski & Non-Golf) to be provided.
Winter - 2,700
Summer -- 3,800
SUMMER
Total No of Beds (design) 3,221
Maximum occupancy Rate (75%) 2,416
Daily Use Demand (75%) of guests) 1,812
Estimated No. of Rec. Experiences/Guest/Day 2x
Total Daily Demand (Visitations) 3,624
Potential No. to be Provided 3,800
WINTER
Total No. of Beds (design) 3,221
Maximum occupancy Rate (100%) 3,221
Daily Use Demand (40%) of guests). 1 ,288
Estimated No. of Rec. Experiences/Guest/Day 2x
Total Daily Demand 2,676
Potential No. to be Provided 2,700
0
RECREATION AMENITIES REPDRT -SUN9URST
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
I. Tennis courts - 10 in number
In projecting the approximate user capacity for ten courts, it is necessaTV
to consider several variable Factors which could affect the final number. Thesp
variables are:
1) Wngth pf cycle. 'Cycle' is defined as the period of actual use
(1 ho"r or IN hours) by a group of singles or doubles players.
2) The time of court occupancy by sinnins and dcuhlps play.
3) N""her of lighted courts.
4) Avai.l9bi li ty of tennis instruction.
R" "c--nl_nn two variables (Sinnles/Doubles play, and one and 1112 hour
KV& PO , the following daily user estimates may be calculated:
One HnriT Cvai_e:
DoVIrs: 12 cycles x 4 persons per court = 48 x In cts. = 480
Singles: 12 cycles x 2 pprsnns per court - 24 x 10 cts. = 240
*Averaqe per day 360
Doubles: 8 CV0es x 4 pP.,TSMS per court = 32 x 10 cts. = NO
Singles: 8 cycles x 2 persons per court = 16 x 10 cts. = 1603
*Average per day 24C1...
*Overall average per day 300
With Addi.tien of Lir+htinq on 5 Courts:
Doubles: 4 cycles x 4 persons per court = 16 x 5 cts. = 80
Singles: 4 cycles x 2 persons per court = 8 x 5 cts. = 40
*Average EEO
Total capacity can be incroased with offering of tennis lessons.
Example: 2 courts devoted to lessons
2 hours ppr day
2 courts x 12 nerscrs = 24 x 2 hrs. = Q
Net user increase: 36
Total averanc capacity 7cr QV
(with lighting and lessons) 396
?I
•
0
•
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18,1973
TRANSPORTATION
This section covers 3 points of concern relating to SUNBURST
circulation and access. Of primary concern is the movement
between SUNBURST and VAIL Village. The 3 points are:
- the "best" transportation system for. SUNBURST
- Anticipated frequency of service between SUNBURST
and VAIL Village
•
Considerations in the management of auto use at
SUNBURST, emphasizing the minimizing of auto
traffic to the Village.
"Best" transportation program for SUNBURST. This considers
2 time periods:
- For the first 5 years, buses are the best and
probably only feasible solution
After 5 years, the nature of the problem will
be determined by transportation needs of adjacent
activities and by the interaction of all trans-
portation programs in the valley.
•
Frequency of bus service between SUNBURST and the Village.
Tentatively the minimum frequency of service has been set at one
trip, each way, every 7.5 minutes. For the peak periods,this
frequency would be exceeded in all but the first year. After
the first year, higher levels of demand justify and support
even more frequent service.
A bus fleet of approximately -the following size would be needed:
1973 - 2, 20 passenger buses
1974 - 6, 20 passenger buses
1975 -- 6, 20 passenger buses + 6, 20 passenger trailers
1976 - 8, 20 passenger buses + 8, 20 passenger trailers
Many fleet arrangements and combinations are possible, of course.
The objectives are to select fleets balancing seriice frequency,
and appeal with operating cost considerations.
The fleet described above (excluding spares) would provide the
service frequencies shown below:
8
C. -
K'E a.1? W AYE
M?NU7?S 4 _
19 3 I`??4 IVIS t97Ca
Y S? 4-. Rz
? The transportation needs are estimated conservatively. The program
described for 1976 will fully support the needs of SUNBURST at
maturity. (The basis of these-estimates was described in an earlier
report).
For this same bus fleet, the chart below compares service capacity with
anticipated needs.
goo
1200 -
?ooa - N??b
S?p.YS goo -
P GR
&CO
doo
Zoo - O?x
i t o
!9'3 ??J?ct I975 (974.
`? ? A XL
Managment of Auto Use at SUNBURST. This is concerned with limiting the
amount of auto traffic generated to the Village by SUNBURST patrons.
Doing so'is consistent with overall SUNBURST objectives of providing
an environment emphasizing the pedestrian and not dependent on
automobile circulation. This will be reinforced by a combination
of the following:
t Valet Parking. Use of attendants to park cars will reduce
the tendency to "automatically" use the car for all trips (the Valet
service will have the keys). In addition, the space saving
efficiencies of attendant parking will result in cost savings
which can help suppport the bus service. The Valet service will
include convenient means of unloading and loading cars (assistance,
baggage carts, sheltered load/unload areas).
+ Tender, Loving Care for Autos. Knowledge that the car will
be washed on arrival, maintained in warm paring facilities, secure from
theft and weather will encourage SUNBURST patrons to leave their
cars. This will be reinforce by a high quality alternative, as
described in the next paragraph.
+ Quality Bus Service. The attractiveness of the bus
alternative to automobile use will be assured by the following:
., high frequency of service
comfortable, environmentally protected terminal
facilities
., clean, well-appointed buses
on-board fringe benefits (coffee, music, happy-hour)
.. friendly, attractive drivers/hostesses
.. adequate equipment racks
+ Disincentives. There are additional discouragements to
auto use which could be used. The following are examples; there
will be no decision on their use without further discussion.
.. High cost of taking the car from storage -- a charge
to SUNBURST patrons for removing their car from parking
(except at the end of their stay).
Traffic restrictions for all but bus traffic -- this
could include one-way restrictions. That would of
course depend on overall street and highway plans.
.. Parking cost at Vail -- a charge for parking at Vail
Village would further discourage random, unnecessary
auto use.
Parking restrictions at Vail -- additional controls
on auto access and parking at the Village, including,
for example, diversion to remote parking facilities.
•
In addition to the above three points of concern in SUNBURST
transportation, there are additional considerations of implementation
important to Valley transportation:
Equipment Selection Guidelines. To the extent possible, equipment
would be acquired on the basis of criteria common with those of the
Town. This is important to later possibilities of coordinated
transportation service in the Valley. (See below).
Initial Operating Scenario. For the initial period of operation,
SUNBURST would assume complete operating responsibility for the
bus service. During this period, it is expected that the system
would operate for SUNBURST patrons only.
Future Operating Scenario. There is long-term mutual advantage to
coordinated transportation service in the Valley. Such coordination
could reduce operating costs (an important long-term consideration),
reduce total fleet size, and increase the effective quality of service.
Specific activities leading to increasing stages of coordination
include:
- Evaluation of equipment pooling -- this could reduce the number
of spare vehicles required.
- Evaluation of driver and maintenance cooperative operation --
leading to reduction of operating costs.
Evaluation of more efficient Valley routing and scheduling --
coordination of schedules and reduction of route duplication
could increase effective service levels.
U_.?
- Evaluation of the benefits of Town operation -- this could
lead to some operating cost advantages and would open
possible opportunities for Federal and State grants.
- Development of an extensive Valley-wide transit/parking
program -- viewed as a whole, single problem, the transportation
solutions may take a different form than they do for individual
sites and developments.. There could be a long-term reduction
in costs.
r-1
L-J
E
C7-A
0
j??]A jE?? T?, ol-lrlR-(c4
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18, 1973
MARKET 14IX OF CONDOMINIUM UNITS
It is anticipated that there will be a variation in the
market mix of condominium units in the various buildings
and phases which will comprise the Shamrock-Vaal development.
Not only will the condominium units reflect variety as
to number of bedrooms per unit, square footage, price per
unit and price per square foot, but also as to whether the
units will be pure second homes or rental type condominiums.
In the case of the latter type, some of them will involve
the "flexibility of floor plan" or "modular" floor plan
concept wherein a unit may contain two or more bedrooms
which can be rented separately. The extent to which this
concept is utilized will depend of course on the demands
which are expressed by the market.
Experience in such projects as Snowbird, Waterville Valley
Stowe, Vermont,etc. where flexible floor plans have been
used has demonstrated that the parking ratios have not
increased thereby and in some cases have actually been
reduced. This is because of such factors as greater use
of air travel, buses, drop-off-rental cars and other means
of transportation by the types of users who are attracted
to such accommodations versus the large family groups
who tend to use the typical two or three bedroom non-
divisible type of condominium units.
0
•
E
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18, 1973
POTABLE WATER'SERV'ICE
The water demands of the Sunburst project have been calculated
on the basis of per capita consumption records from similar
resort type areas and the proposed construction schedule for the
project. These data have been transmitted to the Town of Vail
staff for review and response as to ability to serve this area
from the Vail water supply system. The main twelve inch diameter
water line for Vail runs through the edge of the Sunburst
property. Therefore, little or no transmission pipe line costs
are involved in supplying water to the Sunburst property.
The response to date (verbal) has indicated the Vail water
system can supply the needs of the Sunburst project with no
problem and no adverse effect on other areas within the town
limits. Also, the project will use.water saver shower heads
and water closets to further conserve water. A short section
of the main will be relocated around the Western Core Complex
to assure ease of access in the future.
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
The effluent rates of sewage produced from the Sunburst project
have also been defined as based on experience in other similar
type resort areas and the proposed construction schedule. The
first reaction from the Town of Vail officials was that the
added sewage load could be a problem as the Vail and the Upper
Eagle Valley treatment plants were being overtaxed during certain
critical periods during the 1972 and 1973 years. Subsequently,
however, a study performed by the Ken R. White consulting firm
indicated certain modifications to the clarifer units of the
Vail plant, improvements in the monitoring of the inflow sewage
composition at the Avon plant, plus reduction of the ground water
infiltration into the interceptor line would eliminate the
immediate problem of overtaxed facilities. Additional improvement
plans would enable the two water and sewer districts to adequately
serve the projected population growth in the Gore Valley and the
Upper Eagle District.
The sewage effluent from the Sunburst project would be introduced
into the main interceptor running through the North edge of the
property'. A short section of the main would be relocated North-
ward around the core complex. This relocation would be paid for
the Sunburst project.
0 . .
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 185 1973
ELECTRICAL ENERGY
Electrical service will be supplied through the Holy Cross
Electric Co.. The basic electrical energy demands have been
transmitted to their design engineers and preparations are being
made to supply the electrical energy needs of the Sunburst
project. The transmission 7_ines into the project will be all
underground to minimize visual impact.
•
•
•
•
•
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April 18, 1973
STORM WATER DRAINAGE
The present drainage pattern.for the Sunburst property consists
of two main watercourses, which conveys off-site drainage water
from the National Forest area to the south across the project
to the Golf Course. The on-site drainage basically consists of
sheet type flow, of which a major percentage of this water
percolates into the relatively pervious soils of the alluvial
fans and depositions along the valley floor.
The general drainage pattern will be retained upon development
of the site to minimize visual and environmental impact. Surface
drainage channels will be utilized as much as possible and will
be constructed or improved as necessary with natural rock and
vegetation.
The on-site drainage within the open space
in shallow drainage swales placed adjacent
paths so that concentration of water flows
from thetwo building complexes will be cha
water ways such as the pond area just East
portion of the property.
areas will be routed
to the pedestrian
is avoided. Drainage
nneled to existing
of the easternmost
0
? pMG??,Ga???
SUNBURST PROJECT
VAIL, COLORADO
Status Report
Avalanche Studies
The snow avalanche phenonmenom as it effects the Sunburst
project in Vail, Colorado has been under study since late in
the 1971-72 winter season. The first report (reconnaissance
in nature) by Whitney (Whit) Borland was printed in July of
1972. The report delineates the major slide path, designated
as the Clubhouse Gulch slide, and the half a dozen small wet
spring type avalanches that generally originate below the
lowest limestone member outcrop.
These slide paths have been verified by studies conducted
during the 1972-73 winter season (to-date) by Ron Halley and
have been outlined on a 1"=100' scale project map. This
-? information has been utilized by Seracuse and Lawler and
Partners in their architectural and planning studies for the
project.
The multi-year monitoring program of the smow avalanches which
was defined by Ron Halley in November of 1972 and has been
approved for implementation by Shamrock - Vail is underway.
The objective of this program is to obtain a full definition
of the characteristics and hazards of these avalanches through
on-site data collection and snow avalanche analysis using
techniques developed both in the European Alps and the United
States study centers at Alta, Utah, Berthoud Pass, Colorado
and research center at Fort Collins headed by M. Martinelli.
The data collection requires a finite period of time because
the personality of each major avalanche differs considerably
and an analysis in which control structures or a formal control
program is contemplated cannot be adequately defined based
upon a "one time" data sample or transposed data from other
sources.
The snow avalanche problem on the Sunburst-project consists of
two vastly different type of avalanches. The Clubhouse Gulch
avalanche is basically a large climax type avalanche with a
potential vertical fall of nearly 2,000 feet. It is this
avalanche to which a major portion of the continuing avalanche
study is being addressed. The study schedule will provide
sufficient data for a fairly definitive analysis of control
structures during the spring of 1974.
-1-
r?
Considering that buildings are not being planned for the
runout area of the Clubhouse Gulch avalanche and that the
recurrence interval of this avalanche is on the order of one
in fifty years, this schedule appears adequate and in line
with a practical and reasonable approach to this problem.
The other avalanches, as mentioned previously, are relatively
small wet spring type avalanches. These avalanches have a
recurrence interval of two to ten years but can be easily
controlled by either nominal size retaining or buttress
structures and/or formal control measures involving either
chemical application or mechanical altering of the snow pack
structure. The control program for these wet snow avalanches
will be defined in more detail after observations during April
and May of this year.
For ease in reference, a brief description of the two types of
snow avalanches is presented below:
Slab - Climax Type Avalanche
Slab avalanches as distinguished from loose snow avalanches
are characterized by significant internal cohesion of the
snow which is usually created by mechanical action of wind.
The common characteristic of slab avalanches is that a large
area of snow begins to slide at once. A well defined fracture
line, where the moving snow blanket breaks away from the stable
snow or at least the snow pack that didn't move, is very
evident in slab type avalanche.
Slab avalanches are subdivided into soft and hard slabs. Soft
slabs slide leaving the typical fracture line, but have the
general appearance of a loose snow avalanche until sufficient
movement develops to reveal the immature slab form and blocks.
The snow debris deposited by a soft slab avalanche is usually
a formless mass similar to that deposited from a loose snow
avalanche. A hard slab is characterized by snow of sufficient
cohesion to retain its form in motion. The principal feature
identifying the hard slab avalanche is the presence of angular
blocks or chunks of snow in the debris. The case of the
Clubhouse Gulch avalanche, the lower chute area between the
rock outcrop creates major turbulence within the sliding mass
and breaks up most of any blocks that may retain their shape
to that point within the slide path. The configuration of
the rock outcrops and cliffs in this "throat" zone also effects
the shape and orientation of the runout or debris zone of the slide.
-2-
~, ".
E
Wet Snow Avalanches
Wet snow avalanches are normally active in the spring or early
summer months. The sno~r mass is lubricated by melting water
and the snow mass is often at relatively high density due to
the free water added to the pack. Typically, the shape of
the wet snow avalanche is similar to a loosesnow avalanche
i.e. originating at a point, but the spread angle is usually
much less since the melt water is normally concentrated
in a narrow band down the fa77 line.
In the case of the Sunburst project area, the wet spring
avalanches generally originate below the lowest limestone
cliff or outcrop line and are created in part by a concentration
of melt water from above to a particular point in the cliff.
_~~
~~ona d L. Halley, P.E.
and .
Rational Avalanche Instructor
I~..S.P.E.
.~ April 5, 1973
•
-3-
•
.•
•
~o~i~ ~ac~~i=~~~
SUNBURST CONDOMINIUMS AT VAIL
April l8, 1973
FIRE PROTECTION
Following conversation with Mr. Fran Bush, fire chief, regarding
present available fire equipment in Vail, we feel we can
accommodate Vai1~s fire trucks with easy access to all
buildings and plaza areas as proposed with a minimum effect
on the natural or man-made terrain. Special access points and ramps
wi~.l be provided. A11 buildings can be reached within the 100
foot reach of Vail equipment. Detail provisions will be sub-
mitted at time of working drawings.
r ~
I
y
H
=-~
RG met J~/17./73 with Seracuse, Jerry Jenson (att~y}s Clancy? Brady, others...
~~'urpose was to show RG 7.atest stage of plans (not much different from plans
presented in Vail to Council) and to discuss zoning problems and taming,
Aevelopers Hoed to have council approval at meetings in Vail !x/18-19 because
~~ y i+rallt to start building and, have to live approval.. ~yl~jf~yl~{~/jl~~~(/j~~[~g~
Question remains what foam of approval will. give them assurance they can go ahead
without Later "change of hearth by Council, New zoning ordinance will not be
effective (RG guess) until. June or July. Ta wait far final. adoption of a special
development district within the new ordinance means no building tha,s season,
Alternatives appear to be
l) some form of approval and a greement between the Lawn and the developer
undarthe present "emergency" design review process that permits construction
to begin
2) some form of emergency zoning to cover the site that contains the essential
controls needed to let the project go ahead unta,l thenew zoning is
adopted.
Developers prefer something closer to {1) because nobody can guess what
the outcome of a ser~fies of pub~.ic heara.ngs on the new ordinance coulr~
produce ,
RG said the concept of SDl was to write the provisions after agreement between
town and developer on the essentaal.s of density, area, uses, and height
I~cB doe snot propose to write prav3.sions before this agreement . (Actual writing
of the SD 1 section of the ordinance is a minor task once a1.1. agreemtents are made)
if necessary, it might incoporate stxne form of map or development guide in addition
to tent,
Developer is throwing out various sweeteners (contribution to bus system, recreational
amenities, community use of multi. media center„ etc.} that cannot be finally resolved
next week. Obviously they want density in returns retaining as much as possible
from ~rh:at existing zoning will perm:zt.
Developer (and attorney) is concerned how design review might affect the project
even if agreement on density, etc. can be obtained, Fhrase re "alpine vill,aget'
bothers them, far example.
r ,.
v
~~x~, ~ die . sr.~~ .
~/y- ~ ~,
~~; ~
~..
~~
MINUT$S
DESIGN REVIEW SESSION
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
APRIL 24, 1973
A design review session of the Town Council of the Town of
Vail was convened at ~:15 P.M., April 24, 1973, in the Council
Room of the Vail Municipal Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
Josef Staufer
:-Tom Steinberg,
Gerry White
Also present were:
Jim Lamont, Administrative Assistant
Diana Toughill, Zoning Administrator
. Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
Kent Rose, Town Engineer
The meeting had been called to review a proposed "Findings
of the Town Council". Councilman White asked if his under-
standing that the developers would rely on these findings in
order to complete their working drawings was correct; the
Mayor indicated that it was. Mr. Robinson noted that the
"Findings" were not as binding as a contract.
At this juncture, Mr. Clancy of the Sunburst project joined
the meeting.
Mr. Lamont pointed out that as an official survey has not yet
been made, it would not be a good idea to deal with specific
land--parcel figures at this time. Mr. Clancy agreed with
this point. Mr. Lamont noted that the wording in regard to
valet parking should be that it is "required" rather than
"supported". Mr. Clancy suggested that they meet the parking
requirement of the old ordinance; Councilman Steinberg pointed
out that the difficulty iS the size of the spaces, not their
number. Mr. Clancy suggested that they would prefer to
experiment with the valet parking for two years; if, after
that time, it did not appear to be successful, they would
increase the parking provided in the .later phases. Mr. Rose
added that another reason for requiring valet parking would
be to minimize the traffic across the golf course; otherwise,
it might be necessary to construct pedestrian--auto separations.
It was also noted that perhaps a strong statement to the
effect that the developers will attempt to minimize traffic
is needed.
It was clarified that the project will be presented as a
special zone under the old zoning ordinance, as the new one
will not be ready by then. Additional clarification was
that at the time of the new ordinance, the special district
will be incorporated into that document.
l
~. ...
Zn regard to the height of the project, Mr. Lamont stated
that it was his understanding that the eastern complex was
not to exceed forty-five (45) feet, with minor adjustments.
Mr. Clancy disagreed; it was his understa~ading that it was
not to exceed fifty {50) feet. Mayor Dobson suggested that
the Findings be worded in such a way that. the eastern build~.ngs
were limited to five (5} normal stories, not to exceed fa.fty
(50) feet. After some discussion of the variable heights of
the plazas on. the main complex,-Councilman Steinberg suggested
that the formula of near buildings being three (3) stories
above front buildings helped to simplify matters. Mayor
Dobson suggested that this form`~.~1a be combined. with a further
limitation that in no event could-.the back building exceed
sixty (64) feet from the walk-a.n level. Mr, Clancy mentioned
that the height should not include elevator penthouses,
which are necessary to their project..
Mr. Lamont questioned the wording, "transportation for the
city"; it was his concern that it not be interpreted that
the city has any commitment to the project in-terms of trans-
portation. In addition, at no point did the Findings mention
that the developer has agreed to provide transportation. Mx.
Clancy agreed that the decision on transportation coind be
included in the "Findings". Returning to the portion under
question, Mr. Clancy .suggested that the wording had been
included as their attorney desired. to list those items
which might be adjusted in order ta.achieve density reductions
beyond eleven per cent (11%). ~:In the same vein,. it had been
discussed that perhaps the recreation fee, which the Sunburst-
group had calculated to be around.$3.40,0OO,,could be reduced
all or in part in.oreter;to retain same of the amenities they
proposE. As an aside, Mr. Lamont noted that the amount of
the recreation fee had not.been calculated by the staff and
might differ from that calculated by the developer. Council-
man Bailey summarized that tho essence of the paragraph of
which the questioned phrase was a part was that there will
be some negotiation between ll% and- 15%.
Mr. Lamont commented that it would be preferable to stipulate
a square footage of allowable building space rather than using
other less-defined methods of. allowable density calculation.
This square footage will need to be adjusted following the
new survey. Mr. Rose mentioned that da.scussions with the
Recreation District regarding proposed land exchanges are
still pending. After some calculations, 732,870 square feet
was determined as the allowable square footage following the
15% reduction. Discussion of the percentage of the land to
remain in open space resulted in a determination of the figure
to be included in the "Findings" at seventy-five per cent (75%).
Mr. Lamont suggested that it was. necessary to conduct design
review for each stage of the project; Mr, Clancy agreed to
this. It was also agreed that both a master and phase land-
scaping plan are needed.
S
-2-
r
In discussion of the performing arts center, it was noted
that the use of the facility would be public, with the Town
scheduling events an the same basis as others desirous of
using the facility. In further discussion of the proposed
Findings, there were many wording changes necessary to
eliminate value-laden words. In regard to the question of
employee housing, Mr. Clancy noted that the housing which
is planned will be built in Phases 3 and 4 and available in
late 1976. There would be 150 to 200 emp3,oyees involved.
Approximately sixty per cent (60%) of these will be housed.
Mr. Clancy noted that they have considered the alternative
of purchasing employee units elsewhere and providing trans-
portation. There was some discussion of whether employee
housing should be required in the same structure, both for
this project and others.
Councilman White suggested that there should be a deadline
after which the Findings would have no effect. It was agreed
to insert the first of September, 19731 as the deadline..
Items which were mentioned as being needed prior to the
hearing were a list of building materials and a support
plan for the plaza area. It was suggested that in regard
to the recreation fee, wording be inserted to the effect
that "applicant has submitted his estimate based on caicu~-
lations from the former zoning41 without Council comment.
In regard to their plans for access to~he .property, Mr. Clancy
noted that many of their plans will depend on the decision
made by the Highway Department on a Bighorn interchange.
There were also questions of who would be financially
responsible for any necessary pedestrian separations and
other roadwork. Mayor.Dobsori suggested that wording be
inserted in the Findings to the effect that any agreements
are subject to a satisfactory negotiation regarding the
expense and maintenance o~ roadways. It was suggested
that the fire-study. be'a joint project-of.the developer
and the Town staff.
As there was"no further business, tYie meeting was adjourned
at 3:35 P.M.
1,.-~
Town Clerk
/nmm