HomeMy WebLinkAbout68 E Meadow Dr Unit 106;,-!>
?'.-.-_ -I.'I,ANN
.at
ING ANI)
Monday,
IINVIRONI|IjN]'AL
October 12,
3:00 p.m.
coMMrssl0N
l98t
I,
1
Approval of minutes of Septenber 28, 1981 ,
Request for densi'iy control variance to extend existing loft area
on unit f304 of the Vorlaufer. R.l{. Pickens.
3. Request for a conditional use permit in order lift the restrictionto limit the stuCrent body of the Vail Mountain School.
4. Request for a variance fron side and front setbacks for a residenceat L763 Shasta, lot L2, Vail Village West Fiting #2. Applicant:Gottfried Angleitner.
5. Request for a conditonal use perrnit t.o have a real estate officein space #7 of thc Vail Village lnn, Phase III. Applicant: P.
Van Ewing, III.
6 . Request f or an anrendment to the Tor^rn of Vail Zoning O:'diriance No.30, seri.es of 1977, to aCd the allolrrance of one enplo1'ee unit,
on Lot 6, Block 2, Potato Patch. Applicant: Vail Investment and
Developnent, Ltd.
I)ublished in the Vail Trnil Octobcr 9, f981.
J -2- Lo/26/8t
3. . Rbquest for s conditional.use permi-6 to have 'a real estate office in
spac l
Dick Ryan stated that he had distributed copies of a letter fron Joe Stauffer
sayinS that
- stated there would be electronic control over the' parking spaces, and t:,-,- there wouli be a "non-conpete't provision in the
lease to restrict.the use of comnercial space to only one real estate fim.
Jin Jacobson, rePresenting the applicant, brought a coPy of the lease and
showed it to the cornnission nembers, showing the non.conpete clause'
The real estate office was allowed 2 spaces which would increase to 4 when
Phase IV was completed. Jacobson pointed out that the parking situation
would exist no natter vrhat part of the building the real estate office
was in.
Dick pointed out that if, the lease is discontinued, the PEC can review
the request again and will be reviewing all requests for conditional use.
Peter said that the conditional use perrnit could run the Iength of the
lease. Duane asked if the board were requiring a non-compete clause. Dan
answered that there liras no need, that other real estate offfices would
have to cone in for conditional use review. Scott said that he had a strong
feeling about thdir being involved in the lease negotiationsDuane stated
that he felt that the board should not be involved in lease negotiations.
Gerry felt that it was not necessarff-o have a non-conpete clause because
the conditional use permit clause gives the conunission the kinds of control
it needs. He added that Joe Stauffer fel.t that this space did lend itself
to office use and that it would not inpact negatively'
Duane noved and Will seconded to approve the request for the conditional
use based upon the following findings: (Section 18.60.060 B).
The vote was 5=0, unaninously in favor of granting the condional use.
', 4. . Request fon a. xninor subdivision to vacate. and resubdivide lots 2 and
3 of Cliffside Subdivision. Applicant: David Cole.
The applicant requested to table his reqlest until the next neeting. Dan
rnoved and Will seconded to table. The vote was 5-0, unaninously in favor.
5. Request to amend the official zoning nap of lhe TowJr of Vail, i{r_?!99l.danc9with Section l8 of the Tor,m of Vail lnlunicipal Code to change the SKL Museum,
Tract B, Vai.l Village 2nd Fi-ling fron Public Accornnodation (PA) to Public
Use District (PUD) and change Tract C and D, Bighorn Tounhouse Subdivision
frorn Residential (R) to Agricultural and Open Space (A) District'
Applicant: Town of Vail.
./
.tr.,-
PEC, -3-
and front setbacks
r0/L2/8L
st for a variance fron side for a residence
Gottfried Angleitner.
at L763 Shasta, lot 12, Vail llage il ing
Peter Patten explained the memo adding that the staff recomnended denial ortabling to let the architect arrive at a better solution to the site.
John Perkins, architect for the applicant, stated that the issue is thatMr. Angleitner desired to build an European style chalet, and that the house
would have to be rectangular. Outside dimensions would be 30 x 40, feelingthat 2400 sq ft was a necessary size for a fanily of 4. He explained thatthe lot faced south, and also the views are to the south, so they wanted toput the garage in the back and out of the way.
Dan stated that after being out on the site, that he would agree that it
was possible to have a better design. He was rnore in favor of putting the
Sarage in the front. Johnrs reply was that he didntt want to show the garage
doors on the front elevation. Roger suggested put.ting the garage on the otherside, and Peter replied that this would move the house within 5 feet of theproPerty line, and that those neighbors had already disapproved of the planas it existed.
John said that he has a letter fron the owner to the west and that this owner
:::.:::":T_::.::::T""::":, ,,a,ed,ha, he had bough, ,he 10, beforeannexation and didnrt realize the restrictions. He felt that the hortheastcorner was not buildabLe. Dan pointed out that the neighbor to the west hadsold the lot to Angleitner. Gerry felt that building the house as presented
would overcrowd the neighbors. Duane said he did a hasty check on iquarefootage and found that with 1100 sq ft footprint, with height, could allowthe structure to be close to the required size, and that there still couldbe a $rolean style.
John explained that the lot was 4 to 5 feet lower in the back, and wantedto work with little excavating or fill, More suggestions regarding steppingthe living spaces down, trying to adjust the building shape to fit the lot,-and the south exposure followed. Roger mentioned thit th; pEc is concernedwith energy conservatiorr, and that the south exposure was inportant. perhapsshifting the house to the east was discussed, -though a lettlr had been receivedt'rour the property ouTler to the east protesting the setback requesrs.
owner requested tabling until the next regular pEC meeting.menbers voted in favor of .the request to table.
The
The
5'.' 'Request. for a conditional use permit to have a real estile_gfgce in-rpace.ffior-ffidEwing, rrr.
Peter Patten explained the mcmo,the nalls in Lionshead and Vail
Jim Jacobson, representing thefor offices rather than ritail
adding that this nal 1 would be similar toVillage and should be treated the sane way.
applicant, stated that the location was idealshoPs'.that it was located toward the back.
r
Pric -4- 'L0/12/81
He added that one would have to go down stairs and that it. didntt fit intothe traffic pattern and was not on the street level , He added that if there
were to be a nix of retail space, this would be as close to retail as manythings. About the parking issue as stated in the memo, Jacobson felt that
the whole idea of rnalls is to get people in, and didntt see how a real estatboffice could generat.e more traffic than a furniture store. (The staff inthe nemo stated that with 12 sales people, the real estate office was boundto cornpound the parking situation.)
Gerry rnentioned that this was to be a pedestrian nall, and that if alt theretail spaces becane offices, the natl-EfrEiETF would be lost. The real
estate office could be on the 2nd floor as well, he added. He felt that the
whole village should be treated the sane.
Dick Ryan explained that one reason the new rnall had a connection torvard
Crossroads was to connect to the opening in Crossroads to the west. He agreedwith Gerry that the idea was to have a pedestrian, shop oriented nall to tTyto tie toSether the whole village.
Jin Jacobson nentioned that there was already a parking problem on the backof Crossroads and'wondered how that could be a good place for people to walk.
Dan felt that this connection was better than the one in front of Crossroads
where there wete 50 or 60 cars.
Gerry White said that the pedestrian level should be a more.active shoppingcenter or dining, rather than office, Peter P. added that the uses should
be visitor oriented. Dan pointed out that the visitor is already going tobe on foot after parking in the parking structure, and so would not generatetraffic as a real estate office would.
Scott stated that back when real estate offices were a real threat--when they
were making nore noney than the retail shops, it nade sense to legislate thernout of the core areas, but that people do browse through real estate officeslooking at the pictures and brochures. However, he added that a real estateoffice on the ground floor does become. very valuable space,
Roger agreed that it made sense to legislate real estate offices out of Bridgestreet or malls, but didntt think it made sense to cornpare this rnall withvail Village and Lionshead. He felt that each particular applicant shouldbe decided separately. Danrs concern was with the idea of just how nany norereal estate offices were going to want to be on the ground floor if one wasallowed at this tirne?
Peter repeated that this rnall was designed for an interesting comnercial ,shop-oriented atnosphere, similar to Cornmercial Cores 1 and 2, designed forhigh traffic and was planned to be a prirne rna1l as stated in the nemo.
Jacobson said that the developer had designated business or professional usefor that spot and for another spot also. He added that t1Ere were no realestate offices in the Crossroads area. He felt that the environment, shouldbe looked at each time, and didnrt feel they were setting a precedent.
{'
>
r
PEC _s_ t0/t2/8r
Dan nentioned that .!9 !"a just corne fron a vacation in Durango and as he walkedthrough the town' didnrt tike at1 irt"-teui.estate offices-on .he nain street,and that they were no! looking for real estate offices. Eric Bachman feltthat if Dan had beei-Tron ??flasa p"rf,"p., they might have-been looking forreal estate offices, He added ttt"i tt"y intended Io have the office veryattractive with lots of models.
Jin suggestedlimitingthe nurnber of real estate offices in that nall. Gerryreplied that there wourd_be no lray to limit other realtors fron asking forconditional uses. Dick Ryan mentioned tt.t peofie-r,.a-i"it"a to hin aboutchanging the first floor Lf trre iianJra to rear estate offices. Jin wonderedabout using a deed restriction.
l{ill Trout wanted to know what percentage of the area the reat estate officewould be taking' scott saw no iiererenle if Gore-n*gu--p"op"rties asked tobe in that building than in th" il;-s;;p area. Jim Morgan fert that maybehorizontal zoning shourd be tarked auou't "itrt the whole area in nind.
Jin-Jacobson suggested rooking at having only one real estate office in thebuilding with a non-conpeting lease in i6e deed restriction. Dan remindedhim that they couldn'. !_". "io"nJ-inu'parking and traffic. '.l."lil"ir"rlii"ato see studies showing that it, woutd iiideed [enerate i."gii". Gerry fettthat the parking was not ttr-e issue, ror-ir tnutu was any parking at all, peoplewould use it. Roger felt that there ,0u"" *ny unanswered questions.
Scott and Duane felt that if there were alteady 42developer put in the spaces would have nothing tothere wer-e already too few p."fi"g--"pi"u". Rogeragainst the project now, bui with-rnore infornation
spaces short, what thedo with the fact tharstated that he would votemight vote for it.
Jacobson asked if the only additional information needed was with regard toparking and deed restrictions, and "tt"a "rro for a porl of opinion from thenenbers.
Jin stated that if the appricant could come back with a deed restriction andeirse his concern of the pirking, fr",igi,t vote in frvor.---'
Duane felt that he did not want the appricant to show a deed restriction.
Dan felt that what was needed was a clarification of restrictions concerningparking and he was concerned with traffic.
Gerry felt he would vote no now,how nany real estate offices were
will would like to see a real estate office there with a rease agreement.
Scott was in favor of the real estate office without a lease.
Roger was concerned about the parking prograrn for the whole progran.
Jacobson asked to table till the next regular rneeting. The nembers voted7-0 in favor of tabling.
because who knew the magic nuuib er oftoo many?
a
);
ffi[i'JRAIiiJUll
'l'0: l)Ianni.ng and l:nvi r:o;tntcnL al Cotnmi-ssiorr
FROtrl: Ilcpartnont of Connrunity Dctrclopncnt/])t:te:: Pattell
DATiI: 10/7 /81
RE: Conditional Use Perrnit appl ic.atir:n to l)crnit a rcal estate office in :;pace
No. 7 of the Vail Vj.l l,agc lnn Plrasc 3 on mall lcl'cl .
Appl icant: P. Van iirving I i I
pEsqril-llgl jF PR0l:0::p_!r!
]-he ncr,r I)hase 5 cf the \ra j.1 Vil lage l1n cor-.tr irrs an er-1:en-si.vc ltcdestriart Inrl. l ancl
over 9,000 sq ft of conn:crcial area. The Ccvcloprnent is part of Speciai Dcvelop-
nent Di.strict 6 which stipulatcs all uses w,ilI be the satne as those itr the Publlc
Accoluircdation Zorre Dj.str'ict. The :rpplicant rvj-shes to u-sc J.260 sq ft of space
as offi.ce for his real cstate business.
CRI'IERJi, AND IlNDINGS
Upon rrerriew of Section 18.60, the Depat:trncnt of Comnr-rnity DeveloPment recoinnenrls
denial of the conditional use pernit based upon the fol lowing factors:
!g:!.jj" r'-q!-lSL_Sf_ f a c t or L:-
3"1jl!i!f]-ll'r_L n"!*ftPj!tL_jti_q'j_use on devql,"jl|9ll!_9hgglryl:_€_!b9-Totrn '
Onc of thc clcvelopment objectives of the -l'or'n, r'rhich is directly reflccted in
the zoning codc, is to leserve nal I or s1--lL-(',t lerrcl spaces in c-olnmercial areas
for touri st-oriented rcta j-1. -shops, The VVI i)ir:,rse 3 conrnetcial area wil l becone
one of thc prirne tourist shop area.s in thc Vi-l tage area" and hirs always been designeii
with that objectivc in rnind. Being consi slrcrlt r,Iith these objectives and l:eccilt
year dccisions on rcal est,ate off i.ces on msll 1.el'el, ue feel rcal estate offices
are t,ettr::.' srritr-:d to othe:: tl'ran mal l levcl sl)aces,
The efi:cct of the use on liglrt and air, dis1.r'ihy!!o_ryof UqlllLl_!1o12_try*t}T9l1.'!,1j1]TiJiiiil-cs, udiiiiii{l'c,tr,;l1-tJrds aftl- rcCrclticin TiciTit-j{13g! ollgU&'l:-.-
f:f:.i::.t_C.-r,{_Bb-l_t*C-_f_"qt_l_l-93S::fSgg:,
No signif ic.ant effects on tilesc factors .i.s foreseen.
Flf fcct r.liron tr'cf f ic rvith prlt't icular refclcnc'c to congost ioll , utonotivc attil
pcdcstri:'n snt'('t) rn.J-Conr.;,:rii ('r*^; iTtlri--it r'low ln(l rc'r)tloi, a(:ccss, tt\t_l:tlYgll!i.!itt_r
gl{_r .qlll.l!l_l- _cll_IrqllLo_ril _r_lf!'*..tlq9-t__lld_l,j?}t ,il'g a Le r i:
l{ith th,,- addit ion of 1:i0 spr(:cs j.D ['hlsc-. ] l t , t.hc VVI .i s rnakirtg up a por'tit'n of
thoir p:illi-irrg rl-.1'ic i.t rrlr.i cit has c..:.istctl for' ir nurnbcl o1' 1'citt'-s. 'Iltc1' .rctitl.titt :lpPr-o)i i--
nrtcJ;. .ll sl,:rcc:; :rh<ir-t of mcr.t in;i ctrrr-e:nt :orrin.rl codc: r'.'clitircltlcllts. A Icltl c-ital c
tti'llicr: is:rn c.xtr'tluol)/ l)ill'l. jnll* jnf (Ils j-\/c ulic. Ilnn/ cals rr'oulti bc itt aritl otrt c:alcil
rhv, ci'lrrpoitntlcrl b1' tho r-rlployoc 1>:rrk irrg ::i.i Lrltion, (.'l'ircy irttt:nrl to hlrvc I f l;aIi:s
J w'1 \1"'o'
of this officc. ) lVc fr:ei that to approvc ..;uch a use inalready short of par.king rtould bc irr error.
!!l"g!-"pga!tr"_charac_1.cr of the ar.a in lvhich thc proposctl *se i-s to belgt'lEq.j'iclgllrls Th€'-.rr9 ?qa-b.ilI1tjt!_i"r,*!a-';; -,_r"*gAtIg_g:gr_.=-
The character of thc area in the nal1 of Phirse 3 has always been designed foran interesti.ng conmerci.al , shop-orientcd atrnosphere, simiiar to couunercialCores I and 2. f'he Urbart Dcsign Cuicle Plarr tooke<l at the wholc area surroundingthe "old vi1lage" as taking on simjlar chr.Lra cteri st ics to the village core(Gore creek Drive and Bridge street), and corrcspon <lin91y reconunende<l thatsteps be taken to enlarge the atnosphere, design^and uses which rnake up thevillage. ltrle feel that the-;e objectirrcs woultl not be net by approving iearestate offices on street or nta1l level in this trexpanded vittage" area, whichincludes the Vail Village Inn phase 3.
with this in nind, the pranning and Environnental cornmission shourd stateclearly that real estate offices will not bc approved in trre ,,vair vil1age,,area and so nake it a poli.cy of record.
f"3pr" working orrt
a cornnrcrc ia I alca
$usLlther factors. and criteria. as the Commissj-on decns applicable to thcproposed use.
An EIR has been submittcd and approved with the approval of phase 3.
F rNplNGS AN.p RECOIIaENDA'|rONS :
The Departmcnt of Conmunity Developnent reconmends that thePermit be denied based on the follort,ing findings:
That the proposed locatic'ir of the usc is not j.n accord withthis o'dinance and the purposes of the distr:ict in which the
CoDditional Use
the purposes ofsite is located,
Mr. P. Van Ewing, III
227L No. Frontage Rd. WestVall, C0 81657
Mr. Bwlng:
Pur suant to the requests
mLssLon of the Town of Va
s 1t ion regarding parklng
non-comPet lng Real Estate
In order to enf orceparklng spaces butlt ts my lntent tonetlc cards and/or
rlgtd control over notover al-1 speces owned by
ut l1lze electronlc gates
securlty per sonnel .
only your tno (2)
Va11 Vtllage Inn,controlled by mag-
Inn wll1 restrlct
one Real Estate
lease agreement a
As for assurances from me that Vatl V1l1agethe use of commercial space to one and only
f 1rrn, I agree to add to ancl lnclude 1n yourtrNon-Compete" provis l-on.
.AGI P -r .:): 9t :.! | EtEpHOi.rt_ ,JJ 476_5622
of the Plannlng and Environmental Com-
11 , thls letter is to conf l-rm my po-
restf Lctl-ons, parklng 1ot control andfl.rms !vlthln Va11 Vtllage 1nn.
Y
In leaslng space ln Vall Vlllage Inn, you wil1 have made ava1l-able to you, only two (2) parklng lrpaces (at an addltionalrental rate to be deternlned). These w111 be the only tvo (2)
sPaces available for use by you, your staff, or your customera.
ncerely
IIvE3 )
t
ll
"J
L
-11I'ritu '.f' " '-\"^'' tl
o
If
q
9
J(IHBu
1ter,ta.
.eJe 6u!{JeC-'', ''
(
,. '' :'..,' 1 \:
lfl
;.?
t?hT
l\\'*4i:,
ovctu SglvJ.NcltiJ
arcgulrcdI.Thl,r ProcodureConditional Use
lhe aPPlicationsubnitted.
A. NAI'IE OF
is reguircd for anY ProjectPermit.
will not be accePted until
APPLICATION
CONDIlTIONAL
FONil FOR
USE PERMIT
28 August 81
to obtaLn
all informatlon is
P. VAN EI,TING, IlI
ADDRESS
APPLICANT
2271 No.Front age Road-West, Vall, C0 PHONE 47 6-472L
B.NN{A OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT I S REPRESE{TATIVE P. VAN EWING, III
227L No. Frontage Road-West, Va11 co PHONE 476-472L
C. AUTHORIZATION
SIOIATURE
JO
ADDRESS 58 So PnoNE 47 6-5622
D.
\
LOCATION OF PRO?OSAI,Space il 7 Vall V111age Inn , Phase III
Road-East, Val1, COADDRESS 68 So. FronEage
E.
LEGAI DESCRIPTION LOt
FEE $50.00 plus l8f for each ProPerty owner to be notified.
F. A list of the name of owners of all property adjacent to the
subject ProPerty and their addresses.
1. Crossroads of Vail l-41 E. Meadow Dr.2. Kiandra-Tallsman Lodge 2O \ai1 Road3. Vall Vlllage Husky 12 S. Frontage Rd.-E.
4. Alplne Standard 28 S. Frontage Rd.
5. Hollday House
c/o Hollday Inn 13 Vall Road6, Skl Museum c/o Town of Vall7. 1st Bank of Vatl 17 Val1 Road
Vai1, CO 8L657
Va11, CO 81657
Va11, CO 81657Val1, CO 81657
Va11, C0 81657Va11, C0 81657Val1, CO 81657
t
is reguircd for any project rcqulrcd to obtaln a
Pemlt.
will. not be accepted until all inforntlon ie
P. VAN EWING, III
t'28 August 81
APPLICATION
CONDIIIONAL
POSI FOR
USI PERI.iIT
I.Thl,t ProcedlureConditlonal Use
Tha aPPlicationsubnitted.
A. NAI.{E OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT
2271 No.Frontage Road-West; Va11, C0 PHONE 476-472L
B.
c.
D.
NN,TE OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT I S REPRESEiITATIVE P. VAN EWING, III
227L No. Frontage Road-West, Va11, C0 PHONE 476-472t
O!{NERAUTHORIZATION
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS 68 S PHONE 476-5622
LOCATION OF PRO?OSALSpac e /17 Va11
ADDRESS 68 So. Frontage
Village Inn , Phase III
Road-East, Va11, CO
LEGAI DESCRIPTION Lot
E. FEE $50.00 plus 18+ for crch proPerty owner to bc notlfied.
r. A list of the name of owner! of all property adjacent to the
subject proPerty and their eddresses.
1. Crossroads of Val1 141 E. Meadow Dr. Vall, CO 8L6572. Kiandra-Tallsman Lodge 2O Yall Road Vall, C0 816573. Vall Village Husky 12 S. Frontage Rd.-E. Va11, C0 816574. Alplne Standard 28 S. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 816575. Hollday Housec/o Hollday Inn 13 Va11 Road Vail, CO 8L6576. Skl Museurn c/o Town of Val1 Val1, CO 876577. lst Bank of Vall L7 Yail Road Vai1, CO 81"657
t
is reguired for anY ProjectPermit.
will not be accePted until
APPI,ICATION
CONDITIONAL
rOH{ FOR
USE PERIIT
t"28 Auguet 81
reguLred to obtal-n
all infornatlon is
aI.Thio ProcedureConditional Use
fha aPPlication
submitted.
A. NAI.{E OF
ADDRESS
P. VAN EI"IINC, IIIAPPLICANT
2271 No.Frontage Road-West, Va iI-, C0 PtfoNE 47 6-47 2L
B.
c.
D.
NAI.IB OF
A.DDRESS
APPLICAI{T' S REPRESENTATIVE P. VAN E!{rNG, Irr
2271 No. Frontage Road-I{est, Va11, CO PK)NE 476-472L
o[f,rERAUTHORIZATI
SIGNATURE
JOS
ADDRESS 68 PHONE 476-5522
ADDRESS 68 so. F'o.j.g"_39tEi-:Phase III
Va11, CO
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot
E. FEE $50.00 plus 181 for each ProPerty owner to be notified.
F. A tist of the name of o\,nerg of all ProPerty adjacent to the
subject ProPerty and their addresses'
1. Crossroads of Vall 141 E. Meadow Dr.
2. Klandra-Tal isman Lodge 20 Vail Road
3. Va11 V111age Ilusky 12 S. Frontage Rd.-E,4. Alpine Standard 28 S. Frontage Rd.
5 . l{o l lday Housec/o Hollday Inn6. Ski Museum
7. lst Bank of Va11
L3 Va11 Road
c/o Town of Vall
17 Vall Road
Vail, C0 81657
Va11, C0 81657
Val1, Co 8l-657
Va11, Co 81657
Va11, C0 8L657
Va11, C0 81657
Va11, C0 81657
t
is reguircd for anY Project
Permit.
will not be accePted until all infornution is
APPLICANT P. VAN EWING, III
28 August 81tAPPLICATION
CONDITIONAL
FOFI FOR
USI PERilIT
rcquiredI.to obtaln aThig ProcedureConditlonal Use
The aPPlication
submitted.
A. NAl"lE OF
ADDRESS 2271 No.Frontage Road-West; Va11, C0 PHONE 476-472r
B.NN,IE OF
ADDRESS
APPLICANT' S REPRESE{TATIVE P. VAN EI,'llNG ' III
227 I No. Frontage Road-West, Va11, CO PIIONE 47 6-47 2I
c.AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OT{NER
SIGNATURE
JOSET STAUFTER
ADDRESS 68 so. Frontage Road-East- valr. co PEONE 476-5622
D. LocArrof rool"t"*?,"rotfr il
ADDRESS 68 So. Frontage
Village Inn, Phase III
Road-East, Va11, C0
LEGAI. DESCR]PTION LOt lin
E. FEE $50.00 plus 18+ for each proPerty owner to be notified.
F. A list of the name of or^rner8 of all Property adjacent to the
subject property and their addresses.
1. Crossroads of Val1 141 E. Meadow Dr.2. Kiandra-Talisman Lodge 20 Vail Road
3. Va11 Village Husky 12 S. Frontage Rd.-8.4. Alpine Standard 28 S. Frontage Rd.
5. Ilo 11d a y Ilouse
c/o Hollday Inn
6. Skl Museunr
7. lst Bank of Vail
13 Vail Road
c/o Town of Vall
L7 Yal1 Road
Vai1, C0Vai1, COVail, COVai1, CO
Val1, C0Vail, COVail, C0
816s7
81657
81657
81657
81657
8t6 57
8L657
t APPI.,ICATION FOru FOR
USE PEru'tITCONDIfIONAL
Thig Procedure is reguircd for eny proJect
Conditlonal Use Pernit.
The apPlication will not be accepted until
APPTICANT
2271 No.
t"
Frontage Road-I"lest,; Vail , CO PHONE 47'6-4727
28 August 81
rcguLreA to obtaln a
all inforntlon is
\
I.
subrmitted.
A. NAI'{E OF
ADDRESS
P. VAN EWING, III
B.NA}18 OF
ADDRESS
APPLICA}TT I S REPRESENTATIVE P. VAN EWING, III
227L No. Front age Road-West ' Va11' CO PHONE 476-472L
c.AUTHORIZATION
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
JO SEF
68 So.PHONE 47 6-5622
D.LOCATION OF PRO-POSALSpace /l 7 Va11
ADDRESS 68 So. Frontage
VJ"1lage Inn ,Road-East,
Phase III
Va11, CO
LEGAI DESCRIPAION DOt
E. FEE $50.00 plus 181 for cech proPerty orner to bc notified.
F.Alistofthenameofown€rgofallpropertyadJacentLothe
subject proPerty and their addresses'
1. Crossroads of Vall 141 E. Ileadow Dr.
2. Kiandra-Ta1lsman Lodge 20 Vall Road
3. Va11 V111age Husky 12 S. Frontage Rd. -E.4. Alplne Standard 28 S. Frontage Rd.
5. llo 11d a y Housec/o Hollday Inn6, Ski Museum
7. 1st Bank of VaiL
13 Vail Roadc/o Town of Vall
L7 Yail Road
Vail,
Va11,Val1,
Va11,
Va11,Vail,
va].r,
co 81657c0 81657c0 816 57c0 8L657
co 81657c0 8L657c0 8L657
I
Mr. Ra1 ph Santangel o.|98 Union
Suite .|00
Denver, C0 80228
Re: Phase iII
Dear Ralph:
I have reviewed the Special Development District Six permitted and
condjtional uses and they are the same as the Publjc Accommodation
Zoning District. Enclosed is a copy of the pages pertaining to.
Publ ic Accommodation and Conditiona'l Uses.
For your information, the Town has been concerned with the officd
type uses on the f irst floor in Vail Vi'l'lage.
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-s613
Apri'l 14, 1980
Before a bujlding permit isof the Town Council and the
addition, a decorative fence
by the Design Review Board.
Dick Ryan
Di rector
department of community development
issued on your property, a'l I conditions
Design Review Board must be met. In
around the ent'ire property must be approved
S'incerely,
?-AP'
Vai'l Vil lage Inn
-l
}
I. Thig procedure is required for any project required to o'btal-n a
Conditional Use Permit.
The apPlication will not be accepted until all infornratLon is
submitted.
A. NAI'{E OF
ADDRESS
P. VAN EWING, IlI
Frontage Road-West j Vai1, C0
28 A.ugust 81
APPLIqATION
CONDIEIONAL
FOR!i FOR
USE PERIIIT
\
APPLICANT
2271 No.PHONE 47 6-472L
B.NAI'IE OF
ADDRESS
APPLICAIiIT ' S REPRESNTATIVE P. VAN BWING, III
227 I No. Frontage Road-West, Vail, C0 PHONE 476-472L
c.AUTHORIZATION
SIGNATURE
JO
ADDRESS 68 sq P''otlB_a1 61622_
D.LOCATION OF PRO.POSAI,Space /i7 Vail
ADDRESS 68 So. Frontage
Village Inn ,Road-East,
Phase IIIVa11, CO
f ,J1'Js'
LEGAI DESCRIPTiON LOt
E. FEB $50.00 plus 18+ for each ProPerty ovtner to be notified.
A list of the name of olrnera of all property adjacent
subject property and their addresses'
1. Cro ssroad s of Va11
to ther'.
141 E. Mead ow
2. Kiandra-Talisman Lodge 2O Yal1 Road
Dr.
Rd . -E.
Rd.
Vai1,
Va11,
Va11,
Va11,
Va il ,Va11,
VaiI,
co 87657co 8L657c0 81657c0 8L657
co 8L657co 81657co 81657
3. Vail V111age Husky
4----*fgfirs- St andard
r1r----ttolt+ay House
c,/ o Hol id ay Inn
-6:---.sFi-T-n-dETrtr.Mank of Vall
12 S. Frontage
28 S. Frontage
13 Vail Road
c/o Town of Val1
L7 Yall Road
September 2 2,, rg9o
Mr. Rodney Slifer, Mayor:rnti Town CounciL Members
Town of VaiIVaif, Colorado Bf65?
Dear Mayor Sl-ifer and CounciL Members r
First, t.his is not a petilion but an important concern of the
tenants in the VarI Vi-Llatr,e Inn curnplex.
We, the undersigned, are totally against the appeal made by
Century 2l- for commercial- space in the Vail Village Inn building.
We are against any change of use of present hoteL rooms in the
existing Vail Village Inn building into commercial space. We feeLthe parking situation is already in excess of its capacity. We
understand there is a deficiency of parking spaces at present.
AJ-so, this will only set a precedent for other hoteLs wanting-toconvert.
It is a totaL nigh'bmare now, and it i-s compounded in the wintertime with the winter crowcis. We have del-ivery trucks of all-kinds and sizes, some l8-foot grocery trucks that take up thefront and entrance of the l-ot blocking traffic coming and leaving.
'I'here has been as much as 4J minute delays until the driversfinish. Wr: have trucks everyday servicing lp comrnercial- tenantsincluding the housekeeping department for the ViIIage Inn, customers
and tenants; parking behind one another to go to wclrk or to get intothe restaurants, deli, l-iquor store, Swiss Dog, for quick pickupitr:ms. Burnpers and cars being backed into because of lack of spaceto get. out once in. The slick conditions in the winter force carsan(i delivery trucks to sLide into other parked cars. Hotel, VillageInn Pancake l1ousc, and Stcin Garden grc:;ts who cannot find parking infront of these businesses, employees who work in town, tourists,sales people calling on restaurants, skiers, all use this lot be-
cause it is convenient. Unless a tenant's space is chained, hewil-I not have his space when he needs it, and even then, he maynot be able to use it because someone wil-l- be parked in front ofhis space. We have overf-Low from the Holiday fnn and Holiday Inn
Condominiums taking spaces for days at a time
We have only one ingress and egress. It is difficult to use the
exit behind the Huskey station. They have a parking probJ-em alsosince they do service work on cars and have a car wash, employees,and other people infringing on their cramped parking. There are
ti-mes when it is so crowded, it is diff i.cul-t to walk throughwith cars driving through or backing up because they can,t go on.
The way the parking situation is now, bhere is much damage to cars
"1] year long, even those parked in the cies;ignated space-. Vrlith-out controll-ed parking, it is f ooj_ish to t,ry to assign more spaceson a piece of ground that has been impacted time and time again.
Any new people wanting to be tenants shorrl-d be made to wait untilthe new buirdings are buiLt wllich wil.l provide underground parking.ldith more shops, restaurants, and condominiums in th6 new uuitoin[s,we must be guaranteed that the parking requirements are met.
Further, we cannot stress enough, that any additional conversionsin the viltage of other hotel iooms for any change of use, conmer-ciaL or condominium, wirl be denied as it witt seriousty atteci -
the existing balance necessary to satisfy our consumer -bed base.we support the Planning and Environmental commission;i denial ;i
t[: f,?#:l":{"lli"fi:fi' i"5;:"i3'"l3fri!"?3"":l,:ii . -nli""ls:Tlilflwe strongly are opposed to.
I"lr. Rodney Slifer and
Town Council Members
Page 2
September 22, I9B0
Eve's r'ragrance andAlpenrose Tea RoomCreative BookbindinThe Gift GalleryVillage Inn Sports
SincereJ-y yours,
I
Cosmeti,c Bouti -.e,-?---.--..' C/ "
/(.(,
If_..(--:x
---4otal:-{al+-.
The Silver PIum
.C our WaLlS" r
Elegance
Swiss Hot Do
---ear+.o'tt.+riqaeq:=:Vail Food and D61i
The Stein Garden.-_Arr+i++__
0l-iver's Homem
cc : Jirn ]{ubin ,/"t '
Jo..;ef Staufer
(The icnants whose signatures do not appear were not available.)
TO:. PLANNING ANE
FROM: EBPARTMENT OF
I{BMORANID.UM
ENVIRONMENTAI COMMISSION
COMMUNITY DEVALOPMENT
DATE:
RE:
IM,t9/4/BA
Conditional use andEnterprises, Inc. toInn to allow a realEstate Company.
Parking Varian.ce request for Ewing-Bachmanconvert Unit 128 in the Vail Villageestate photo gallery for Century 2l Real
Upon revievr
reconmends
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE
unit 128 was previousJ-y used as a lodge room and is now usecl asstorage. rt i-s located.directly East of ti-re sw:iss Hot r-log companywith the entrance being on the btank rr'all just East of tb; FIot- Doacompanyts enLrance. The propose<l use (as describe<l in thr: accompinyingletter) is for a real estate'-photo ga1ler1. vri-th only one ernplo1,ei.
CRITI'JRIA AND FTNDINGS
fbctors:
Commun.iLy Developmentbased upon the following
con@:
$lelWn:Ifp-and impact of lE_ggg1r" ,i"t"lopn"nr obithe ?own .
*;]-E{i1};!tls,_yl?. ?n ligh!.. an4 arr, distriburion of _popularion,transportation faciIitiesl- uElrlEie.s, -EEooG rl< s and r:ecreationacr_lfligqrsnd othcF public tac-if it:ss-ar,ic faciLii-ies needs
This use should have no effect on the above factors.
of Section 18.600, the Dep.ertment ofDenial of the Conditional irse permit
we feel that this is- the wrong rocati.on for a Real Estate Gallerybecause we believe that the Real Estate Gallery will generate auiomobiletraffic and that the vail Virlage rnn park_ing 1ot uy irris locationis too congested at the present time
Effect u rr tr:affic with t.icul a:: referencc to conqe sL,ir:ne11tgryq!5.q and pedcrstrian atfetv e.na conven Lence tratf"ic florvand control , access , rnEneurrcr_ anlTil;and rerlova of snor.r iromthe street and paiklng aGEEI
There l! a.50 space parking deficiencl, at the vail Village fnn untilPhase rrr is constructed.. we feel thit this definitely iesultsin a deficiency of parking for the vi rlage rnn comprexl arid thatapproval of this applj_cation w:-II aggravate the problem.
.Century 2I - 91.4/t- P4ge 2 I
Effect"upgn the.ch?ragtef of.lhe area in which the proposed use
is to be located, r-ncruqLng Ene s
usee.
The proposed use wilL actualty improve the aPpearance of this corner
of tire LriitOing, by replacing-a blank wall with windows and a doorway.
Such other factors and criteria qs the Cornmiqsaon deems applicabk
to tne proposeo use
There are noother factors deemed applicable.
The environmental ct re rt concernin the pro
an environmenta ct re rt is required bv Chapter
Not applicable.
FINDINGS AND RNCOMMENDATIONS:
The Department of Community Development recommends that the Conditional
Use Permit be 4enied based on the following findings:
That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the PurPoses
of this oidinarrce and the purposes of the district in which the
site is located.
That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which
it would le -operated or maintained would not be detrimental to tbe
pubJ.ic freaftfrl safety, or welfare or materially injurious to ProPertiesor improvements in the vicinitY.
That the proposed use would cornply with each of the applicable Pro-
visions of this ordinance.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
if
The Community Development Department reconunends denial , because
we feel thaCthe pholo galJ-ery will generate automobile traffic.
We also feel thatl espeiial-ly in this location, the existing parking
problems are serious enough that new uses should not be allowed
wrtif the necessary underground parking facilities are provided.
PARKING VARIANCE
!{e feel that the parking variance is inconsequential , and that the
real decision shoirld be-made under the Conditional Use application
If the Conditional- Use request is approved, we feel that the Parking
Variance is not a separate issue, and therefore should also be approved.
If the Parking variance is approved, a payment of $250 (.05 space
x $5,000) would have to be made intib the Parking Fund.
!r
@(
REALTY OF VAIL, INC.
227 | North Frontage Road - WestVail, Colorado 81657
|'303l, 476-4721
(3031 629-934r
TO: DBPARTMBNT oF
FROU: VAN EI{ING
COUUUN ITY DEVELOPI,{ENT
DATE:
RE:
4 September 1980
Application for Condltlonal Use permlt and parklngVariance f or Vail Vtll,age Inn Buil-d tng # 5 Untt # Lzg
Pureuant to your request for a wrr-tten narratlve on my lntendeduse of the space above referenced, r wish to create a rear eatatephoto gaLlery at thls Locatlon. Thls ga1!-ery w111 iluplicate thegallery which r now have and wl1r retain at my corporate head-quarters ln the chamonlx center Building at 227 1 North FrontageRoad West ln lrlest Vall.
Thls newly created gallery wil-1 provlde a t,I{al.k-rn" location formy customers who are l0cated in the V1l_lage. These customersnlLl now be able to ut t]-j-ze the Town of vail bus systems or walkto thls locatlon and vlew a photo display of the propertles rhave available. Thls space wirl be stafied by only one of nyagents uho w111 pa.rk ln the parking structure, take the bus lowork, and stay at this location for the entire shlft, only maklngappolntments with customers and not "touring" fron thls locatl-on.The bulk of rny business vll-1 contlnue to be conducted from mychauonLx center location and agaln, this new location vill onlybe a photo gallery.
The prlor use of thls space was a lodge unit at the v alr. vlrlagernn and the unit has been rendered unservlceable to then now be-cause it is located at the servl-ce entrance to the phase 2 remodel.As a lodge unit, this space had 61/lo0thrs of a parklng space alro-cated to 1t. As a photo gallery, the town would-requlie 66/toottr'sof a parkl.ng space, or a net differbnce of 5/100thrs of a space forwhich we would need a varlance. As a lodge unit, the a11ocat.d par-klng space was ln frequent use. As a phoio ga].lery, the traffic willbe foot traffic or bus traffic and the allocated parking space wlllnot be used, thus assisting in the rellef of the existing parklngcond1tLon at this lo ca t lon.
My intended reoodelLng plans also call, for a brlck paver patio whlchr feel wl-ll enhance the aesthetic qualLty of this area and add to thecontl-nulty of the paver patiors which now exist throughout theVlllage Inn P1aza.
tB
REALTOROEach Office is lndependently Owned and Operated
Page 2
In concluelon, I feel that the condltlonal Use Permlt and
Parktng varlance ehould be granted eo. that L can remodel and
,rp-gt.d. the exletlng area, add to the landscape and patlo coa-
""pI tn"t exlete throughout the Vatl Vlllage Inn Plaze as rell
a8 the Town of vall , add a "walk-In" faclllty to thls area of
town, thue relievlng the parklng load and belng located so that
I can monltor the uee of thie parkLng lot and asslet 1o the con-
trol to the mutual beneflt of ny busLness' the adJaceirt buelneeeee,
the Vlllage Inn PLaza, and the toltn of Vall.
Stng:\ell ]ouf,a 1qC7 ) A .--{,4/A---}itr2"*-
P. VAN EIIING IIi
Owner/ Broker
\
-.1?'
0
_Er
PT'BIIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GMN that Ewing-Bachman Enterprises, Inc.
representing Century 2L Real Estate of Vail, has applied for a Condi-
tional Use Permit and a Parking Variance for Unit I28 in the VaiI
Village Inn to allow this unit to be used. as a real estate office.
Appli.cation has been made in accordance with Sections
18.60.020 and L8.62.020 of.the VaiI Municipal Code.
A Public Hearing will be held in accordance with Section
l-8.66.060 of the Municipal Code on Septernlcer 8, 1980 at 3:00 P.M.
before the Town of VaiL Planning and Environmental- Commission. Said
hearing will be held in the Vail Municipal Buildingr
. The application and information relatj.ng to the proposed change
is available in the Zoning Administratorrs office during regular business
hours for review or inspection by the public.
Jim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTI'TENT OF COMMI,JNITY DE\TELOP}4BIT
Published in the VaiL Trail, August 22, 1980.
MEMORANDUM
TO:PLANNING COMI{ISSION
FEOM: DEPARTITIENT OF COMIIUNITY DEVELOPIIENT
DATE: ilAY 19, L977
BE:
The Department of Community Development l:as reviewed theproposed plans for Phase II of the Vail Village Inn Special Develop-ment District. The proposed building is in conformance with allregulations of the Special Development District Zone. Pbase IIwill_contain. 7.919 square fee.t of commercial space, 2,9I7 sq. ft.of GRFA in three druell-.ng units,and I,600 sq. f-t. of storage which
becomes part of the underground parking when Phase III is built.
There is one problem associated wj-th Phase II which is notaddressed j.n the Special Development District Ordinance, but wasdiscussed at the- time approval rvas given for the SDD. Parking wiltbe approximately 50 dpaces too few untit Phase IfI begins. Ourstaff suggests two conditions for approval of Phase If:
1. That the parking be controlled either with a gate orby a parking attendant so that the available parking will be usedonly by guests and customers of the complex. The available park-ing will also have to accommodate constl'uction vehicles and materials,and this use should be closely supervised.
2. In the event that Phase III is not constructed within atwo.year period from the completion of Phase II, that the Planning
Commission and Town Council review the parki.ng which exists (approxi-mately 114 spaces) and determine if that number is adequate- Ifthe Planning Commission and Council determine that parking is notadequate, an alternative plan to provide the required parking besubmitted.
3.' During this intervening time, Vail Village fnn should
document parklng usage in as much as practical. This will assist
-a 'cLal.aA
Ln-a...,- 4b/,// {;-sI -7t+-J-.
-zzyJ-/,
ln settij5 "Hr-ery*lpJp.arking requj,rement for the balance of thstzprojectT Oi- do-c-Um6nt- tli6 -ectual need in. the. event that the project
does nort oifS*,..,,h, _*-,8--._.1flru /;., z. {i ,* zI o*,-l
l9e rvould strongly recomrnend the approval of {n"3" II of tbe Vail 'a''--'lu-'-Village Inn.
.714'h4- z? r.Vrz-'a't.- (
t ),IOI{N OT VAIL
APPLICATION FOR.
ITIONAL USE PERIIIT
Application Date
Publication Date
,o,7
Public Hearing Date
Name of Applicant
Name of Owner if dif ferent from ApPlicant
Mailing Address /.(
Telephone
Legal Description: Lot C , Block f.p , Filing
property s unpla ted su
Application is hereby made for
metes
a Conditional
escript on
Use Permit
as ex
a1low:to
P4,rft
ina
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOI{ING:
1. Hearing Fee - $SO.OO + 159 for EACH addressed envelope.
2. A LIST OF THE OIfNERS OF TI{E PROPERTIES within 300 feet in a
single-Family Resi.dential ; Two-Family Residential; or Tr,t'o-Family
Primary/Secondary Residentia]- Zone District; or adjacent to
the subject property in all other Zone Districts
The owners Llst sha1l i.nclude the names of all owners and the
legal description of the property owned by each. Accenpe€:Fi+g
t$as-+*sffira1T*be pre-add:resssfl slv.el nFaq aloag 'with
certiffies--and Return Rece.ipts properly fi1led out to each
owne:e-,--{Fhss€ forms can be obtained f rom the U.S. Post Office.
3. Site P1an, floor plan and other documents as required by the
Zoning Administrator
4. A description of the precise nature of the proposed use, its
operating characteristics and measures proposed to make the
use compatible rvith other properties in the vi-cinity.
68 5.
Mr. P. Van Ewing, III
2271 No. Frontage Rd. WestVa11, CO 81657
In order to enforceparklng spaces but1t ls my intent tonetlc catds and/or
rigld contTol over notover all spaces owned by
ut 1112e electronic gatessecurl-ty personnel.
on ly your two (2)
Vail Vtllage Inn,
controll-ed by mag-
Tnn wil l restrict
one Real Estate
1ea se agre emen t a
As for assurances from me that Vail VillageEhe use of commercLa1 space to one and only
f lrm, I agree to add to and lnclude 1n your
"Non-Competert provls 1on.
lY'{ncereq
-irrr1r.,' l0l a76-5622
\Mr. Ewlng :
Pursuant to the requests of the Planning and Envlronnental Coro-misslon of the Town of Va11, this letter ls to conf l-rm my po-sltlon regardlng parklng restrictl-ons, parklng 1ot control andnon-competl-ng Real Estate flrms wlthln Va11 Village Inn.
In Leaslng space ln Va11 Vtllage Inn, you will have rnade avail-able to you, onLy two (2) parking spaces (at an additlonalrental rate to be determlned). These will be the on1_y two (2)
spaces available for use by you, your staff, or your customers.
\Arl Vruacr Ixx
Vilhrre Inn I'hz.r Conlrniiiluurs
June 24, 1989
Mr. Peter Patten
Director of Conmunity Development
Tonn of Vail
75 So. Frontage RoadVail, CO.8l-657
Dear Peter:
v,pV
\r
This letter 1s
Phase III.in regards to the northeast commerclal space in
I understand there j-s some question as to what Ehe premises can beused for, and a suggestion has been made by one of your staff
members that we are not allowed to use it for office space.
As you may recall, and hopefully it is part of the town records,this space nras approved for a condltional use as office space and
has been nothing but office space since 1983. We have trl-ed torent it as retall space for the past six months, but have been
unable to do so, even at the nominal rent of $i0.00 per squarefoot.
Since there is no other use that this space can be put to, and sincethe conditlonal use was approved in 1983, I r+ould appreciate yourlooking into thi.s matter and directing your staff accordingly.
Thank you for your he1p.
Sincerely yours,
VAIL VILLAGE INN
Jdppf fer
Prdbi &glng Director
JS:Tn
The potential tenants would like to go
the lst of July.
into business startins
sr
en
P.S
100 East Meariow [)rive Vail, ( olorad o 81657 (303) 476-5622