HomeMy WebLinkAbout122 E Meadow Dr BUILDING D COMMON & COMMERCIAL 1977-1984-y'+Project Application
Architoct Address and Phone:
D"t" Io l\l l)cl
proiectName: Ut LL*.t+ C**'\e- ,:*,;{J '= *
Proi€ct Descrlption: -
ownerAddressandphone: ar" *f l-{ it lr-. "J f Cio J I ccr e C. r, "1.r." :.'.. *--^-
\,M.e" i(+ r, C., {$. E / 6al ( l\ss/-
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zonb:
Zoning Approved:
Design Revlew Board
Date
Motiron by:
$econded by:
APPFOVAL DISAPPBOVAL
Chief Building Official
-ag''? ,/t
Projecl Application
Proiect Nam€:
Prolect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:
Zoning Apprbved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
seconded avt (q v Kgv?&bd.'
APPROVAL
t-l uzl al .,E,.,
.,t . di..f b!{e .* .O ,, - U rst"a p =
Summary:
Zoning Administrator
I
:z
o
/a4
TO
% Toar- '{ r;lI Aa/ 1" /o' tr a sz --l
VILLAGE CENTER
RS.LANDSCAPE PLAN
INTENT:
To turn existing lawn areas into a natural wiId. setting. Thearea encompassed i; oragge will be fenced in order to preserveand protect the wild grasses and flowers. This will elirninatethe spoilage due to dogs and matting of the forage by people.
PLAN:
Remove existing sod, till the soil and plant with thefollowing variety of wild flowers and srasses:
Fl,owers Grasses
Rock Jasmine
Pasque FlowerPearly EverlastingPussy ToesScarlet GiliaLarkspurAlnica
Geranium StickyPaintbrush
AnenonesSalsify
Fireweed.
Ox-eye Daisy
MUllpears
Purple Aster
Goldenrod
OrchardTinothy
Broam
Fescue
1127 RACE STREET I DENVER, COLORADO 80206 r TELEPHONE (303) 355.6400
-
\2!r,, ; ... ,-, r .1 i* ', ir: ,jr ':'j !r-l c>'3
-. J9.,4 4'a-., tru-,*jlt
rr:ilffD *a1:rl| e ar lJr€fiTlddfi9 €F|o"a6
I$II'
a
*l*
R.R
!4
I\t
\
$
€,'-.:*:: i1pi
-\ l*{
t"
F
'+
.'
..t'..t"st
t
l-\.-:'
r,_(
*f
{q
L-s
I
o
4
tI
o
-t 1)dry
I
:o
6g-3,:
t-!
dj--
I{-
iJ
J
5
\
It-'}*
iltt1ql:
r$: j
.3.ti>r
,**-
{iyl
rc'-.s-l{)t,r
q
ll'r$,u
l
15.r---tr
rS
T
qr,a
.,}
Ir
<-i'-t
c.v.
€
;
rl2l-sl
fltl
fl
dl
$
s
,.*7lr-
tj
l"II\\
\
u
MEIdO
PLANNING COMMISSION
RIKA ELRICK - STAFF DESIGNER
24 Jantary 1978
o
NE COBNEB LANDSCAPING
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Fred Hibbard explained to me his current problem with
the lawn area over the IrIE corner parking lot. Apparently '
dogs have caused the area to be more of an eyesore than an
open green space. IIis proposal of chaaging his original
concept of landscaping seeuF to'be a much better idea. The
concept of baving an area plantefl with wild flowers
and native shrubbery and trees is qulte appealing i.f done
properly. No irri-gation would be required except in the
lnltial stage, as well as very litt:Ie maintenance. He mentj-oned
the desire to make thi.s area a fenced off area because of the
current dog problem so it would basically be a vlsual space
rather than oae to be walked through.
Debbie lThite of the Nature Centre felt it nas a very good
idea and relatlvely easy to do. I also feel it ls a very good
idea. It ls not only different but requires so little water, which
has become a very val-ued commodlty lately.
The transportation center across the street is done in native
material and Fredrs idea could easily tie in with that sort of feel .
The concept can be a very successful one if done properly, but also
can become a weed patch if not done well. This should be considered.
VILLAGE CENTER
Pai,e 2Vlllage Center NE Corner Landscaping 24 January l9?8
If a certain quality is guaranteed f would hiehly
recommend Mr. Hibberd,s change in concept.
t rfuer4rl F
VILLACE CENTER ASSOCIATION
P. O. BOX 667 .VAIL, COLORADO 81657
March 23, L978
I"1r. Jay K. Peterson
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 3249
Vail, Colorado 8L657
Mr. Terry Minger
Town Manager
Town of Vail
P.O. Box 100
Dear Terry:
on March 7 the town councit approved a revised landscaping
p1_an for vtllage Center as submitted by Fred Hibberd. During
th" .orrrr"il ts ifternoon work session I appeared, representing
the Village Center Association, and expressed our- agreement
with ltibbErdts proposed landscaping as modified that day by
Eldon Beck with the understanding that such landscaping is
to be completed by June 15, L978. At that meeting it was
suggested by B;ill Wilto that I submit a letter to the town
for your files confirming this position.
I have supported Ehe revised Landscaping plan on the basis
that Fred- Ltso fl-nish off the exterior of the garage and
make an effort Eo solve existing leak probLems in the
garage. Jay Peterson has summaiLzed this in a letter with
I ""[y to Diana Toughill. If Fred does rhe rhings he has
pro*isea to do at tfie time he has proroised to do them the
Vilt.g. Center Association is pleaied to support the revised
landsJaping pLan approved on March 7 by the town council'
J1657 ^ {lr' 'W*It -ar - 1lnWtrtlnr"tL, U t t7-I
VU
Sl-ncerely
Cecil Dotson
President
cc:
a
lnwn
box lfl)
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 4766613
Mr. Fred HibberdP,O. Box 1170
Meeker, Colorado
department of community development
Jawary 24, L978
Re: Completion of Village Center
Dear Fred:
To confirm our meeting of January 18, with Jay Peterson,the following items were discussed and decisions reached. Ifthese items are not resolved as discussed within the timeschedules outllned the Town of Vail will have no alternativeexcept to commence legal action.
1.) The Vail Fire Department has issued a srunmonsfor violation of the Uniform Fire Code. Gordon
Swanson, therFire Chief, has informed me that
some progress has been made toward correctlngthese violations; however, we will not bewilling to dismiss the action until allviolations are corrected.
2.) Construction storage must be removed fromthe garage area as 1t occupies parklng
spaces which are required by the ZoningOrdinance. IYe dlscussed two alternati-ves:
(a) Apply for a parking varianceno later than January 3l , or;(b) Install garage doors to make
space useable for parking (enclosures
must meet provisions of UniformBuilding Code, 1973 Edition).
If you choose the option of installing garagedoors, plans must be submitted no later thanFebruary 1, 1978 and construction commencedwithin 45 days of January 18, and eompletedin an expeditious manner.
o
ge2Pa
3. )
4.)
5.)
6-)
I hereby agreeand understand thatis violated.
to abide by the above decisions1ega1 action will be commenced
and conditionsif any condition
Landscaping was never completed asapproved by the Town Council as a conditionof granting a parkl-ng variance. Landscapingmust be completed as approved no later thanJuly 1, 1978 or a new landscape plan submittedto Planning Cornrnission by fbbruarv 14, 1g28, TownCouncil February 21 : a.pproved, and completed nolater than JuIy L, L978.
Iiandrail must be provided around entry on northeastside of parking garage in accord with UniformBuilding Code, no later than February lb, 1928.
In a meeting on ,Januar;r 24', wJ-Ltt Gordort Swanson,j-t was deeided that thb lofts in Units 2, 4 and'5 of Building D may remain lf AC type smokedetectors are installed in each unit which mustbe wired into the bullding alarm system and-each loft is provided with a stairway acceptableto the Town. This must be completed within 45days from January 18.
A Recreational Amenities tax will be assessedfor gross residential floor area included in eachloft in Building D at a rate of 9.50 per squarefoot of GRFA. This assessment must be naid nolater than February 15, 1978.
VILLAGE CENTRE
DSr/dicc: Jay K. Peterson
Gordon SwansonJim Abbie
i' .."*
MET{ORANDUIII
TO: Larry Rider
FROM: (1) Diana Toughill(2) BiIl pierce
(3) Irlike Carlisle
DATE: July 19, 1976
BE: Village Center, Building D
we have attempted on a number of occasions to contact Frecl
Hibberd, the dever-oper of village center, in order to require him to
complete the project as approved..
The following is a review of the
that d.o not meet Unifor.m Building & Fire
A. UNIFORM FIRE CODE VTOLATIONS
o
items not completed or
Codes and Zoning Requirements:
1. Iire hose cabinets and. alarm system inoperative2, Smoke d.eteetors within dwetline units -not
U.1,,.. approved3. Fire alarm system not connected to receiving stat:ion.4. Storage of flammable materials not allowed in parkinggarage,
B. UNIFORM BU]LDING CODE VIOLATIONS
1. Fire doors in parking garage inoperative2, Lofts included within owetting ,rnit" rvere not incr_ud.ed.in approved plans and do not meet Uni.form BuildingCode Requirements as follorvs:
a. Section 1304 -- no emergency exits. requiresevery sleeping roorn below the4th floor to have approved emer€Jencyexit .b. sectio' 1305(a) light and ventilation not *clequatec. Section 1302(a) Ceiling heights are less than
d. sectj,on 3302(a) ;H.";lli5:f*t;:""seable portionthereof shalL have at least l. exit --no conforning esit.Sectj.on 3305(a) no cotrllorming stairtvaye. Ordi.nance S, Series of l9?4, Sectioil 1AOZ (O) __ foftsas constructed violate f tcms L,2,4,6
traLL t-y lll- (lg'I'
,Ir.r 1y ,1 9; ^I#VA
Iaage {r.yo
c.zoNING ORDINANCE, ORDTNANCE NO. B, SBRIES OF,r9?3, VIOLATIONS
1. Article 14 -- Offstreet Parking ancl Loading
&. 14.300 -- temporary corlstruction office, constructiondebris and other large items stored in parkinggaraSe must be removed, Drivervay on north sideof the parking structure must be completed.
2. Article 15 -- Design Revierv
Landscaping has not been completed as approved (seelist belorv )
Pl-aza has not been construeted as approvedRequired planti-ngs ha.ve not been doneNone of the required Juniper Spruce or Pineshave been plantedd. Of the required 229 2,, to 3" Aspens, only 140a'r - 1rt have been planted.
L of the ),4O -- 24 are deade. No walklay has been provided a.s illustrated onthe landscape plansf. No benches installed as illustrated on the plansg. No lights installed as illustrated on the plans
Trash enclosure, wood retaining wa1l, exteriorlighting, chimney flues were never approved by theDesign Review Board.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREBMENT
1. Plaza was to be completed b5r September 30, 79752. At least 75% of the plaza was to be grass6. Building C was not to be occupied until parkinggarage rvas complete and no Certificate of Occupancywas to be issued by the Town of Vdj_17, Developer has fail-ed to construct pJ'aza in accordwith the agreement & TOV is entitled to 9100,000damages and variance for 22 parking spaces is abrogatedand Certific:rte of Occupancy for Building D is void.
RDSOLUTION NO. 72. SERIES OF 1974
Approved parking varj-ance attaches agreement as exhibit.Variance was granted based on tl-re construction of theplaza as approved.
We feel legal action must be taken as soon as possible to protect the
interests of the Town.
h
c.
D.
E.
LANDSCAPING
At least 75% ot the surface of
Required vegetation
the plaza shall be grass
92 parking spacesfinished by Septenrber 3O, LgTE
1. 21 pfitzer Juniper 4' _ 6,2. b4 Sargent Juniper -. Iow3. 40 Waukegan Juniper _ lotv4. 229 2', _ 3" Aspen5. 16 Red pine 12, _ 2O,6. 84 Blue Spruce 5, _ T'
7 . 75 Armstrong Juniper _ 3'8. 59 Tamarix Junipei _ B'
ActuaI Vegetation
1. 140 Aspen +r - 1', caliber24 of which are dead2. 3 Flower beds with several_ flowers
UIREMENTS OT' DESTGN REVEIIf BOARD MEETING
December 13.
1.
2.
r)
4
April 18, L9ZA
l. Trees_L2,_ZO' (Bed pine)2. Ta1l lights
MEIUORANDUII
1973
!3tg" trees be planted to de-emphasize the height ofthe tallest buildingEvergreens to be planted near the property line on thenortheast cornerThe west end. of the service drive was to be heavilyscreened, bermed & plantedApproval of the pari< design is subject to an agreementregarding parking.
1. l\{ust provide2. Plaza must be
fut*t
-l* L *-
6r11 ,17
.lWU-(Ar'tt&
/).-/| _'-
1.L, ,rt'tL , Oo, -ZoZob
FREOERICfi 5. OTTO
JAY K. PETERSON
JOHN }I, BLISH
PrrrRsolr & Br,rsn
ATTORNEYS AT I,.IW
POS? OFFTCE BOX 3r49
VAIL, COLOE^DO a1657
fr,rlY'
VAI L PROFEsSIONAL BU I LDI NG
(3031 426- ooge
WARNER PRO'ESSIONAL BUI LDING
1303) 949- 53€O
Orto,
April 5, 1978
Fred- Hibberd
Box l-179Meeker, Colorado
Re: VilJ-age Center -
l'lunicipal Court
Dear Fred:
Diana Toughill has contacted me and has informed me that
she is going to i-ssue another Summons unless you commenceconstruction on your parking garage located in the VillageCenter.
The fire alarms located in Unj.ts 2,4, and 5 of Building D
have not been installed and should be immediately.
You also have a Court date on April- 20, 1978 at 11:00 a.rn.in the Town of Vail- Municipal Court.
Please contact me immediately regarding these matters.
Sincerely yours,
JKP,/cw
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMI,I ISSION
DEPARTMENT OI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPI!'ENT
June 28, 1978
Joseph Peplinski - Application for Conditional Use Permitto allow a teal estate management office on the firstfloor "t !I1q: C".tl"_?, in a Commercial Core 2 Zone
I
{'
The applicant has apptried
in order to convert exj.sting retail
to a real estate management offlce.
that office space on first floors be
posed office is 360 sq. ft.
CONSIDERATION OF T'ACTORS :
' Upon review of the Criteria and findings, the Department
of Community recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit
based upon the following factors:
1. Relationshj-p and impact of the use on developmentobjectives of the Town
The horizontal zoning ordinance was adopted to encourage
retail shops along pedestrian ways. The proposed location of the
real estate sales office is in an area where retail shops have not
been suecessful due to lack of visibility from the pedestrian area".
2, Effect of the use on light and air, distributionof population, transportation facilities, utilities,schools, parks and recrea.bion facilities, and otherpublic facilities and public facilities needs.
3. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference tocongestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and
convenience, traffic flow and control, access,, maneuverabil.ity, and removal of snow from the street' and parking areas.
The proposed office should have little or no impaet upon
any of the above factors. Thcre is a possi.bility of additional
TO:
FROM:
DATE;
RE:
for a Conditional Use Permit
space located on a first floor
Horizontal zoni-ng requires
a conditional use. The pro-
. Page,2
Joseph PeplinskiApplicatiqh for.Conditional Use
traffie being generated by the
use has little or no impact on
Town.
Permit
reaL estate office. The.proposed
the clevelopment objectives of the
4, Effect upon the character of the area in whichthe proposed use is to be located...ln relationto surrounding uses.
. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding retail
uses in the building and should have no adverse impact on the
residential uses in this building and adjoining buildings.
' The Department of Community Development recommends that
the Conditional Use Permit be approved based on the following
findings:
' 1. That the proposed location of the use is j.n accordwith the purposes of this ordinance and the purposesof the district in whlch the site is located.
2. That the proposed location of the use and theconditions under which it would be operated ormaintained will not be detrimental to the public. health, safety, or welfare, or materially lnjuriousto properties or improvements in the vlcinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each ofthe applicable provisions of thj.s ordinance.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Joseph Peplinski
has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to aI1ow conversion of
retail space to a real estate office on a flrst floor in the
Village Centre Buildi.ng D, located on l,ot K, Block 5e, Vail
Village first filing in a Commercial Core 2 zone district.
Applieation has been made in accord with Section 18 -26.O4O
of.the Municipal Code.
A Public Hearing will be held before the Town of Vail
Planning and Environmental Commission onJune 27, 1978 at 3:00
p;m. in the vail Municipal Building. said hearing will be held
in accord with section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code.
Published in the Vail Trail June 9, I97A
OF COI{MUNITY DEVELO
S. Toughill
Administrator
F{
o
PLANNING COMMISSION
RrKA ELRTCK - srAFF,r:tg*r\
24 January 1e78 ,4 L//y l)
/ I/ A
VILLAGE CENTEB NE CORI{ER LANDSCAPING---
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Fred Hibbard explalned to me his current problem with
the lawn area over the NE corner parking lot. Apparently'
dogs have caused the area to be more of an eyesore than an
open green space. His proposal of changing his original
concept of landscapinC seettrs to be a much better idea. The
concept of hav.lng an area plantefl with wild flowers
and native shrubbery and trees is quite appealing if done
properly. No irrigation wotild be required except iu the
ln1tia1 stage, as well as. very little maintenance. Ee mentloned
the desire to make this area a fenced off area because of the
current dog problem so it would basically be a visual space
rather than one to be walked through
Debbie lThite of the Nature Centre felt it was a very good
idea and relatlvely easy to do. I also feel it is a very good
idea. It is not only different but requires so litt1e water, which
bas become a very valued commodity lately
Tbe transportation center across the street is done in native
material and Fred's idea could easily tie in with that sort of feel .
The concept can be a very successful one if done properly, but also
can become a weed patch if not done we1l. TLls should be consldered.
' ' Pa,ge 2Vtllage Center NE Corner Landscaping 24 January 1978
If a certain quality is guaranteed I would highly
recommend Mr. Hibberd's change in concept.
o;r^,1t$oTi,v ,{) I#"-\--/' f\J/
department of community development
December 14, L977
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
1303) 476.5613
Ben Blyton
5391 Pans PikeLexington, Ky 40511
Dear Ben l
For your information:
a. The condominium units in Building "D"of Village Center in the Town of Vail ,Colorado, do not have a Certificateof Occupancy as required by Ordinance
No. 5, Series of L974.
b. The reason that these above describedunits lack a Certificate of Occupancyis that the Building is not in compliancewith appllcable Town of Va11 Ordinances.
c, The eondominium units above describedare occupied i11egaIly.
d. The Building Official of the Town ofVail does not foresee requiring
vacation of the above described unitsin'that other means are bei.ng pursued
to assure compliance with applicable
Town of Va1l Ordinances which should
cause less inconvenlence to the unit owner.
ng Offi
rYP/di
Pie iaI
l{arch L0 L977
,o Diana Toughill
I wouLd appreciate any help you can gl-ve us
on the landscapl-ng part of the attachedletter. Fred clearly connnitted to thecity that he would do this and so far has
not done so. You are the only ones who
can make it happen.
Also, if you can give us any help ongetting Fred to finlsh the exterior ofthe garage and flx the leaks we would
appreciate lt. Even though I didnrt
mention lt in my punch llst to him, we
would like to see you put pressure on himto get rid of the construction shack inthe upper level- of parking. ,.rhanks fl/k--
VILLACE CENTER ASSOCIATION
P. O. BOX 667 .VAIL, COLORADO 81657
March i-0, L977
Memo to: Fred Hibberd
Copy to: Jack Curtin - Arthur Bishop & Co.rD6na Toughill - Town of VailVillage Center Board of Directors
Subject: Village Center Punch List
Since last fall you have accompl-ished many of the things that
were on our punch list and we appreciate it. In addition,I have had the Association proceed to repair a number of theminor items. However, there are stitl several things - someminor and some major - that you have promised me would bedone that have not been done. Let me summarize below:
BUILDING A
1. The new trash area is to be therrosealed and/or painted.This is really part of the garage building but it does
serve Building A.
2. The drain to be installed from the lower part of the
sidewalk in front of the NE door was either not completed orit doesnrt work.
BUILDING B
DONE!
. BUILDING C
1. In the NE stair-h7e1l there are sti1l a number of spots
where therroseal and paint are missing. In addition, theplasterer is to cover the hole in the wall near the
entrance to the NE stairs.
a
1.
be
in
Memo to Fred Hibberd
March 10, 1977
Page 2
GARAGE
The exposed concrete on the exterior of the garage is to
finished, plasEered andf ot painted' Reinforcing wires
some places stil1 stick out of the concrete.
2. There are major leaks from the park into the upstairs
parking and then into the lower level.
T.AMSCAPING
Name of Plants & Sizes Plan Call-ed For Actual Planted
My understanding is that Ln L974, in order to get approval
to build Buildings C and D, you submitted Eo the town a
landscape plan whieh committed you to plant over 500 trees
and shrubs around Buildings C and D. On the basis of Ehat
plan you were allowed to proceed. Nowhere near that nrunber
of trees and shrubs have been planted. My copy of your
drawing entitled t'Village Center Landscape" dated April 1-8'
L974, ievised July 9, L974, shows the following breakdown
of plants to be planted. I have indicated in the far
rigitt column what I think has been planted. I- may have
missed a tree or t\do and there might be some shrubs hidden
under the snow but I think my count is very close to
accurate.
Pfitzer Juniper 4r
Sargent Juniper -
Waukegan Juniper -
Aspen ztt-3tl
Red Pine 5't -7'
Blue Spruce 5'-7'
Armstrong Juniper
Tamarix Juniper 3'
.l-o
Low
Low
2L
54
4U
229
L6
54
75
59
al
0
0
U
13C
UI
0
0
528 131
Memo to Fred Hibberd
March 10, L977
Page 3
If this is the correct drawing and if my count is about right,you need to plant an additionaL L49 trees and 249 shrubs!I recognize that these numbers include the north side ofBuilding D and the park, areas that our Association does nothave direct responsibility for. However, approximateLy 2/3of the plants shown on your drawing were to be planted inareas we do have responsibility for. Incidentally, aE least15 of the aspen trees planted failed to make it through thefirst year and so far we have not been successful in gettingyour contractor to replace them as he was supposed to.
I also recognize that your committment to do this landscapingwas a committment you made to the town of Vail and not to theVillage Center Association. That is why I am sending a copyof this letter to Diana Toughill and urging the town to doeverything within their power to get you to comply with theoriginal agreement. I hate to bring the town into this, butthe landscaping is important to us and this appears to beour only recourse.
Looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Cecil Dotson,
ViIlage CenterUnit 3C
President
As sociat iorl
476-2L62
)
tuwlt
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
off ice of the town manager
January 7, 1977
Mr. Jack CurtainP.0. Box 667Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Jack:
These are the most up-to-date expenses for the landscaping behind thevillage center I couid gather. included are the ureatitowis and actualcosts:
r)
2)
3)
4)
s)
Sal ari es
Design Fees
Equipment Rental
Construction Contracti ng
Mi scel I aneous
TOTAL
(RHB&A)
(Rock walls; walkways)
$ 2,700.58
504.00
4,962.84
6,'194.00
894.l8
$l 5,225. 60
This_is up to and including the month of November. Ddcember has not beencompletely accounted for, but I doubt very much that the additional rnoniesspent during December will accumulate to much. should there be additionalexpenses for December, I^ *i ll send you the figures in order to give you amore accurate picture of the spendings -- the statement shoulo 6e compieieaby January l8th.
I hope this helps!
S incere]y,
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,2la gfu.clc,
Ri ka Elrick
Landscape Architect
t-
-
box lfi)
rail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
Mr. Fred Hibberd
P.O. Box 1170
Meeker, Colorado
department of community development
January 24, Lg78
Re: ComPletlon of Village Center
Dear Fred:
To confirm our meetlng of January 18, with Jay Peterson 'the following items were discussed and decisions reashed. If
tbese items are not resolved as discussed witbin the time
schedules outlined the Town of vail will have no alternatlve
except to commence lega1 action.
1.) The Vail Fire Department has iSsued a sumrions
for violation of the Uniform fire Code' Gordon
Swanson. the Fire Chief, has informed me that
sone progress has been made toward correcting
these violations; however' we will not be
wllling to dismiss'the action until all
vlolations are corrected.
,ffinstruction storage must be removed from
tbe garage area as it occupies parking
spaces which are required by the Zoning
Oidinance. We dlscussed two alternatives:
(a) Apply for a Parking variance
no later than JanuarY 3l , or;
(b) Install garage doors to make
space useable for parking ('enclosures
must meet Provisions of Uniform
Building Code, 1973 Edition).
If you choose the option of installing garage
doois, Pfe4-s must be submitted no later than
February 1, 19?8 and construction corxnenced
within 4S Oays of January 18, and completedj-n an expeditious manner.
rlitF
nt,
3.) Landscaping was never completed asapproved by the Town Council as a sonditlondf granting a parking variance. Landscapi.ngmust be completed as approved no later thanJuly 1, 1978 or a new l_andscape plan submittedto Pl4nning Commission by fbbruarv L4, 1-g7g, TownCouncil February !]; approved, and coryleted no.Iater than July l, LgTg
.6 Eandrail must be provid,ed around entry on northeastside of parking garage in accord witb UniformBui.Iding Code, no later than February tb, LgZg.
o
5.) rn a meetlng on :ranualy 24,. wiLh Gordon Swanson,it was decided that thb lofts in Units Z, 4 aid,'5 of Building D may remain if AC type smokedetectors are installed in each unit rhich mustbe wireid into the building alarm system and-each loft is provided wlth a stairway acceptableto the Town. This must be completed rithin 45days from January L8.
to abide by1ega1 actionthe above decisionswill be commenced
and conditionsi"f any condition
DST/dicc: Jay K. Peterson
Gordon SwansonJlm Abbie
VILLAGE CENTRE
-4 A Recreational Amenities tax will be assessedfor gross residential floor area included in eachloft in Building D at a rate of $.b0 per squarefoot of GRFA. This assessment nust ba paid nolater than February 1b, 1g?8.
I hereby agreeand understand thatis vlolated.
red Hibberd
4"-^-(*trn-
t,,y Cci.nrniseionfxpircs Sept. l, lhy'
.Ft
// :P1
AI
ryie--
tuwn
box 100
vail, colorado 8'l657
(303) 476-s613
AdministratorOfficialChief
off ice of the town attorne}
f
-futy Ze , L976
!!r. Fred Hibberd, Jr..General DeliveryEagle, CoLorado' 81631
Re: Vill-age Center, Building D
Dear Mr. Hibberd:.
This office has been requested to commence l-egal actionagainst you for certain violations of the fire code,building code, and zoning ordinance and breach of thecontract provisions.
Please contact me or Diana ToughiJ-l within ten days ofthe date of this letter to resolve these problems. Ifsatisfactory resoluti-on is not accomplished within thattime, I will ask the Town Council for authorization tcseek lega1 relief, including vacating the building becauseof the fire code violations.
Respectfully,.-7^ rD ,
,-or4.Lt-u>t-' ' c-k- t\--^
Tawrence C. Rider
Town Attornev
LCRrzsjm
cc! fanu Toughill, Zoning
-€i11 Pierce, BuildingMichael Carlis1e, Fire
't t
IUBI{ORANDUI,{
TOI
I'ltOir{ ;
DATE:
RE:
Larry Rider
(1) Diana Toughill(2) Bill Pierce(3) ilIike Carlisle
July 19, 1976
Village Center, Building D
IVe have attemptecl on a number of occasions to contaet Frecl
Hibberd, the developer of village center, in order to require him ro
complete the project as approved.
The follorving is a revi-ew of the items not compl.eted or
that cio not meet uniform Buj,ldlng & Fire codes and Zoning Requi::ements:
A. UNIFORM FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS
I, Fire hose cabinets and alarm system inoperative2. Smoke detectors within drvelling units not U.L.appl'oved
f, l'ire alarm system not connected to recei.ving station.4. storage of f rammabre rnateri-ar.s not allowed in parking
l,a'1,--*"''//r'J - ,lB2 uNrroR\{ BUTLDTNG CODB VIOLATTON" *2_,-
Lofts included within drvelling units were not inclucied.in.approved plans and d.o not.meet Uniform BuiJ_dingCode Requjremcnts as follorvs:
a. Section 1304 -- no emergency exits. requiresevery sleeplng room below the4th floor to have a,pproved emergencyexit.Section 1305(a) Ilght and ventilation not adeqLtateSectlon 1307(a) Ceifing heights are less thanthe required 7'6"Section 3302(a) Iiach builAing or useable portionthereof shall have at least 1 e.xi t __
section 33ob(a) ll: ::ll:iililF 3i;l;",,,,.,e. Ordinance 5, Series of 1924, Section l4OZ (ct), -- loftSas constructcd violaic Items I,2,4,6
garage.
b.
Larry rta(ler
Ju1.3.-;1 9, 1976
I]a"ge "fwo
a'
r1\r,ZONING ORDINANCE, ONDINANCE NO. 8, SI'RIES Or' 1973, VIOLATIONS
debrls aud other large items stored in parkinggarage must be removed, Drj-veway on north sof tlre parhing structure must be completed
Article f5 -- Design Review
has not been completedLandscapinglist below)as approved (see
Plaza has not been constructed as approvedRequlred plantings ha.ve not been done
None of the required Juniper Spruce or Pineshave been planted
d. Of the required 229 2" to 3" Aspens, only 140
.,^D E" - 1" have been planted.h' 0
l rJt- l of the 140 -- 24 are dead' e, No walkrva)' has been provided as iltustrated on
a.
b.
the landscape plansf . No bencires installed
S. No lights installed as illustrated on the plansas illustrated on the nlans
B.
Trash enclosure, wood retaining wa11, exteriorlighting, chimney flues were never approved by theDesign Review Board.
I'{EMOR-ANDUI{ OF AGREBMENT
1. Plaza rvas to be completed by September 30, 1975.2. At least '754/o of the plaza was to be grass6. Buildi-ng C was not to be occupied until parkinggarage was complete and no Certificate'of Occupancywas to be issued by the Town of Vail7. Developer has failed to construct pl.aza in accordrvith the agreement & TOV is entitled to $100,000damages and varj-ence for 22 parking spaces is abrogated
" , anq Cga'tificete of,Occupancy for Building D is voici.U4r4 V/.%- o4-.d./-
RESOLUTION NO. 12, SERIIIS OF 1974
Approved parhing variance attaches agreement as exhibit.Variance r','as granted based on the construction of the' plaza as approved, ,/l^,/rrn.'( 4+u','/ ryt'n'? A .?*f'[Ve feel 1ega1 action must be taken as soon as fossibl{to protect the
interests of the Town.
a
grassAt least 75% of. the surface of the plaza shall be
Required vegetation
1. 21 Pfitzer Juniper 4t - 6l2, b4 Sargent Junlper _ low3. 40 Waukegan Juniper - low4. ZZ9 Z', _ 3" Aspen5. 16 Red pine 12, _ ZO,6. 34 Blue Spruce b' - Tl
7 , 7b Armstrong Juniper _ B,- 8. 59 Tamarix Junipei - B'
Actual Vegetatlon
1. 140 Aspen ttt - I" caliber24 of whi.ch are dead2. 3 Flower beds with several flowers
OT'DESIGN REVEIIf BOARD MEETING
December 13,
1.
2.
3,
4.
April 18,
I973
13"g" trees be p_lanted to de-emphasize the height ofthe tallest bui.ldingEvergreens to be planted near the property line on thenortheast cornerThe west end of the service drive was to be heavilyscreened, bermed & plantedApproval of the park deslgn is subject to an agreemenrregarding parking.
L974
1.z.T"99"_ 1.2, -2O ' (Red pine)Tall lights
MEUORANDUM
1.
2.
Ivlust providePlaza must be
92 parking spacesfinished by September 30, 19?5
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
d€pErtment of community development
TYPE OF PERMIT
tsnn
E
mB
BUILDING
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
LEGAL
DESC.
ARCHITECT
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
/38- A
ETRTCAL(ACTOR
PLUM BING
CONTRACTOR
FILING
unur Village Cerrterr
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
MATLADDRESS P.O. BoX 396
FIRM
MAIL ADDRESS
MECHANICA
CONTRACTOR I\4AIt ADDRESS
OTHER
CONTRACT
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
D,trE 4/25/79 PROJECT 119. N-*223 223PERMITNO.
r. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V
2, OCCUPANCY GROUP AB E H IR M
DIVfSION 122a34
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK :
BUILDING
PERMIT FEESTYPE GROUP SO.FT. VALUATION
BUILDING PERM IT
ALTERATION () ADDITIONAL REPAIR O
RECREATION FEE
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
COMMERCIAL SYST
-RESTAURANT
SEATING
HEIGHT IN FT.
-BATHTUB/SHOWER
NO FIREPLACES
-NO.
TOILETS
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCOVERED PARKING
CLEAN.UP DEPOSIT
TOTAL PERMIT FEES
ING ADMINISTRATOR
INSULATION
LA \Ts#..c A R DI N O'b UI L D{N G CONSTRUCTII)\.
I HAREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE
READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE
ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY
WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATFVAIL WATER & SAN, DIST. TAP FEE :
SPECIAL NOTES:
.,;i
Project Name:
Project Description:
- Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Qorrro n
Project Application
,r
Date
i '.rQ-uJa
Legal Description: Lot
Zonei
Block Filing
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
DISAPPROVALAPPROVAL
Summary:
Chief Building Olf icial
I
o
\l{srner Properlies, Inc.
Post office Drower e'|00, Avon, cororodo 91620 903/949-4960 Denver sg4-46t
January 16, 1979
Board of AppealsVail Building Department
Tcwn of Vail
Box 100
Vai1, Colorado 9L657
Gentlemen !
I'Iarner Properties, rnc. has been working wlth the Bullding 0fficiarof the Tor,rn of Vail perraining to section 1305 (A) of the uni.fornBuil-ding Code 1976 Edirion. Ma rk has suggested that lre appeal toyou per:tainlng to certain parts of i.he section that we fecl are notin the best int.erests of the ultinate buyer.
The area that r"re feel is wrong is the venting of laundry rooms di_rectly to the outside, in the event that ttrey do not have naturalventilation, Our feeling is that the washing machine puts offextremely little humldity and the dryer is already venled. Themajority of the people 1iv1ng in the Vail area arl trying to intro_duce additional humidity into the house and any hurnidity that wouldbe put off by these two appliances would be beneficial to the resi-dents in our location. Additionally, we feer that any ventlng to theouts-'rde is a potential for air infiltration and additlonal cost ofheating the units.
we would also like to have authority to vent. the dryers directly intothe garages. The reason for this is that you can use the heat putoff by the dryer to heat an area rather than pouring that heated airinto the co1d. Addltionarly, using a dryer in extrernely cord weathercan cause the outside vent to build up r^rith ice and not close properlycausing a backdraft into the unit.
Thirdly, we would llke to use tire cA/90 ductless fan fotlor* bathroomsand laundry rooms. These have been approyed by I.C.B.O. #2805.
we would app::eclate your considering the above items for constructionin lhases II and III of our }tountain Meador,r project. phase I ofour }torrrrtairi Meadow project has been vented in accor:dance with the1976 l.f .B.C. Code. Thank you for: your cooperarion.
Enc./$25.00 check
dn
Sincerely,
U4&4^i"u
ltrun
departnrent of contnrunity developntent
reil. colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
ir:ovcrnber 20, L979
,,riiy K. ?..rlerson
k>x 3149
Vai1, CO 81657
Re: Hilberd Parking Viola
Dear ,f.ry:
I have inspected the garages at tle Village Center fuilding
and finil tJlenr to be in mnpliance with what was stjpulatedil the Courb hearing. I, therefore, reqr:est that tlte
ccnplaint against !tlr. Hi-bberd be fornally disttissed.
Sincerely,
n.t,li /1 ,a'
y/-4'-.- ;', 4' ( r'/,' ---
i. JarrES A. Rubjn
Senior Plarner
ce3 Larry Esl<I^tith
o
IL, COLORADO 81657
March 16, L977
To: Jirn Lamont
From: Cecil Dotson
Copy to: Town Manager
,sdLana Toughill
Mernbers Town Council
SUBJECT: GORE CREEK FLOODPLAIN
I read, in the July 1975 Vail Trail, about a floodplain study
of the Gore Creek and Vail, prepared by Hydro-Triad, Ltd. for
the CoLorado Water Conservation Board, dated June, 1975. For
those not familiar with the Village Center Association, it
is comprised of three buildings on the north bank of Gore
Creek immediately east of Willow Bridge Road. There are 56
condominiums representing an investment by their owners of
approximately five million dollars and who paid Eagle County
in excess of $60,000 in taxes last year and a lot more this
year. ,As President of the VilLage Center Association, I
have been concerned abo-ut our property possibly being flooded.
Diana Toughill of your office was nice enough to loan me El:e
complete report which I have s'Eudied.
I am alarrned at what I find in the report. In our part oi
Vail serious flooding is: indicated not only at the 100 year
level but also at the t0 year level! To quote from the rcport,
"Flooding above the Willow Bridge Road foot bridge extends
from the bridge back to Bridge Street. Flooding occurs at
the Covered Bridge Store, the Creekside Building, and au
the Village Center (sic) Condominiums Buildings A and B.
Figures IV-2 through IV-6 show flooding elevations in these
areas.tt
To demonstrate the magnitude of the problem I have extracred
the following from Table III-2-8.
;LI-ACE CENTE
To: Jin Lamont
March L6', 7977
Page 2
TABLE III-2-B GORE CRXEK DISCHARGES
Gore CreekIderilification
Cross Section 28
Wiliow rridge Rd.
FooE tsridge
Bridge Street
Streambed
Elevation
Ft.M. S .L.
8L42.6
8144. B
8L46.2
8L47.5
100 Year
Flood Elev.
Ft .M. S .T..
a1 /,1 A
8153. 5
8155.1
8155.9
10 Year
Flood Elev.
FI.M. S.L.
8L47.L
8151. o
81s3. 5
81s3. 7
To decermj-ne the extent of the flooding, one needs to krrow
the grounci elevation of the buildings. In Village Center
Buildirrg A is 8149.5 and Building B is 8151.0. Village Centeris locdied between the Foot Bridge and Bridge StreeL so my
interpretation would be that once every ten years we wouli be
2 to 4 feet under water and once every 100 years we wouid be
4 xo 6 feet under water! I dontt have the elevalions of the
other buildings in town mentioned in the study, bui I presume
the same ching is true, particularly in the lor,rer levei of the
Covered Bridge Store
After Ehe studyr you probably would not allow these builciingsto be built at their present elevations, but we cantL char.ge
the buildings already bui1t. The only hope is to do things
which wili lower the flood leve1 of the stream. If it is
wiEhin che power of the town to do this economically cher I
feel it is incumbent upon you to do so.
I am neither a hydroLogist nor a civil engineer, but it apJrc'il ;:s
to me there are some things that can and should be cione. Ti.:"-":
may be other things to do but let me enumeraie below my
suggesti-ons.
Problem and Suggestion /F L: Remove the cement buttresset;
iinder the Foot Bridge across the creek nexE to the l'/ilioivBridge. These buttresses were formerly used -o hoid boal;s
whlch creatled a dam. That is no longer done because ic rq','.s
killing the trees. Terry Minger was quoted in the July 3-,
L975, Vail Trail as stating that the town was already
I
To: Jim Lamont
Lvrarcn Ib. Lg / /
Page 3
planning on removing the buttresses. rt was noted thaE Ehiswould lower the effective water level. The buttressespresentl-y serve no purpose, are unattractive, and r wouldthirtk could be removed relatively inexpensively. Theirremoval, eombined with regrading of the stream iinmediateryeast of the Foor Bridge (50 to 100 feet) should lower thestreanbed in ihat area by abouE one foot. The regraciing isnecessa-ry because of all Ehe silt that has accumulated behindthe concrete buttresses.
Eroblgm-end Lueeesrion /t 2: Additional regrading of the streamrr:om Srtdge street to willow Bridge could make another di:amaticimprovement. A 1itt1e of this was done in the spring of L975and as reported in the Vail Trail Kirk Miller, one of theexpertss conducting ihe study, said at that time to the TownC-ouncil, "The regrading of Gore Creek was a major asset tothe town since it lowered the water 1eve1 of Gore creek thereabout a half foot.tr The creek profile in the area !,/e arediscussing is shown on plate ZZ, between stati_ons 283(willow Bridge R.oad) and 290 (Bridge srreer). This porrionof the creek i-s abnormally flat compared to the normal failof the creek. The data above shows a drop of the streambcrlof less than 3 feet, with rnost of that occuring betwee",r i^'reFoot Bridge and l,/il1ow Bridge. From Bridge stieet to l,trilioivBridge Road is almost 700 feet. The nor*il creek profileindicates over that distance one could expeci a drop ofabout 5 feet. Lmmediately west of Wi11ow Bri<ige Road (C::i,;sSection 28) the streambed drops another 2 feet or about 5feet below Bridge Street. fhis abnormal profile, which i_.;dramatically shown in plate 22, was probably caused by sil.tdeposited behind the dam in the early years of Vai1. if i,rnorarar profile were reestablished by regrading El-re st::earrtl:e.dbetween tsridge street and cross section 28, the sEreatibecl ai:the Foot Bridge and trrli11ow Bridge R.oad coulci drcp to aror;;ir-i8L44 or lower. This, combined with removal of the buttrcl $esshouid lowe-i: the flood 1evel by about 2 feex
3!s-blem.and suggestion /rt 3: Again according to the vail l.'ra-i.l-,Kirk i'iiller. indicated inJ975 to the council that, "If LirrFoot Bridge across the creek nex.E to the Willow Bridge cor:..1-Jbe removed i.t could potentially remove further flood <iarnr:;-,':
To: Ji-n Lamont
Marcr 16, L977
Page 4
since it wouid lower the T^/ater level about 1 foot.tt The
problem is that the briCge r^7as built too low- ?Late 22
inclicates chai the b::idge low cord is around Bi53 elevation
and the deck around 8155. Water up to that 1eve1 causes the
bridge itself to serve as a dam and creates additional flood-
ing upst::earir. Lt is possible the streambed can be iowered
su-1:"icienciy by Si-rggesiions 1 and 2 so that nigh-water rv:Li
not reacir the 1ow cord of the bridge, but we dontt k:row that
for sure. In the early days of Vail when the pond existed
this bridge probably served a Purpose. However, it appears
co me that it is now redundent and its negatives outweigh its
pluses. Si-nce the Vaii Master Plan calls for removal of
tiris iriage and since i'E might still be a cause of flooding,
we recommend it be removed as soon as feasible'
Problem and Suggestion /l 4: Willow Bridge is built in such a
trict the Gore Creek channel' This
wiil cause flood water to back up at the bridge. Unfortunately,
it seems to me that to fix this problem would requi::e
rebuiiciing the bridge which I am sure is too expeniive. This,
I woul<i think, would only be considered as a iast resort'
I have obviously addressed rnyself to only that Pari of t'ie
creek that affetts the Village Center CondorniniuiriL Coinple:r.
Liowever, this same part of the creek has the greate:i'i irili-rarci:
upon other buildings in the Vil-lage Core. it wouid aPpij'l::
to me tirac the town could, with a mini-mum of cost, lower ''-f-r:
flooci e-Ievation in this area so that the 10 year tir::e,'.rt i:l
eliminaced and the 100 year problem is minimized. i feeL ii
is incr.unberit upon you t; try. I would hope thaE some of chese
suggestions could be implemented this year. We would
appreeiate anything that could be done.
Speaking of things we hope will happen this yearr "re rtaui'ri l''l'c
rt s". implemented the Wi11ow Bridge Road plaa aPprovec'J''r':::i.?'
Town Countil- last year. As I understand ii, one half of '-:ic
road woul<l be for pedestrians and the other hal-f for ofi€-'"t'ali
auto traffic. We would even more strongly eaciorse i:he cc .i;--,:'-:
pedestrianization of Willow Bridge Road. Ats our a-rnual-
meeting held recently, our owrlers reendorsed ou-r approva- c-.
the Vail Master plan and urge the Town Council to p::ocee.^
To: Jim Larnont
llarch 16, 1977
Page 5
with inipleinentation as soon as possible.
_ -,-:= -
Dotson, Presirien:
Center Association
ryw
hrn
P. O. Box 100
vAtL. coLoRADO 816s7
Vail Fire Department
CORRECTION NOTICE
Date o{ original inspection:
Building address:
Time served:
476-2200
476-5613
Ext.223
Date served:
Building name:
Building owner:
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:
tr uNtFoBM FIRE CODE (U.F.C.) VTOLATTONS n
B NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (N.E.C.) VIOLATIONS E
tr OTHER
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PBACTICES
OESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:
ACTION REOUIRED TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS:
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY:A.M. / P.M. Date:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U.F.C. 1973 EDITION
COPY TO: O VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
tr WATER & SAN. DEPT.
tr VAIL POLICE DEPT.
tr PUBLIC SERVICE
N PUBLIC WORKS tr HEALTH INSP.
BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER:
(Signaturc)
lSignatu.e)
o
FREDERICX si. OTTO
JAY I(. PETERSON
JOHN M. BLISTi
Orro, Pernnson
ATTOENEYS AT
POST OFFICE BOX
VAIL, COLONADO
& Brrsrr
LA'W
3t49
4t667
1978
VAIL PROFESSIONAL BUILOING
(3O3) +76-OO92
WARNER PROFESSIONAL BUILOING
(303) 949-s360March 15,
p
Cecil Dotsonc/o Jack CurtainArthur Bishop & Co.P. O. Box 667Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Cecil:
Pursuant to our numerous conversations, it is my under-
standing that Fred Hibberd is to provide the following
Iandscaping and other repair work at Village Center:
1. Mr. Hibberd wilL provide all the landscaping asoutlined on the landscaping map which is on fileat Di-ana Toughill's office at the Town of Vail.
Such landscaping will be completed by June L5 ' 1978,
weather permitting.
2. Mr. Hibberd will paint the concrete on the back sideof Building D and will remove the exposed steel rods.
Such painting will be completed by June 15, 1978.
3. Mr. Hibberdproblems inbe cornpleted
shall attempt to correct the leakagethe garage area of Building D. This will
by June 15, 1978.
I wish to thank you for your cooperation in this matter-If you have any questions or if I can be of further assist-
ance, please contact me at my office.
y yours,
eterson
JKP: sk
cc: Fred HibberdDiana Toughi11
Ir a
o
FREDaRtct( S. O'TO
JAY K. FETERSON
JOHN M, '!tsH
rro, PETsRsoN & Brrsn
ATTOENEYS AT LAW
POs? OFFtCe AOX 3t49
VAIL, COLOBADO A!667
January 5, 1978
VAIL PROTESSIONAL BUILOI NG
(3o3) 47e-o09?
Irl'ASII{ER PROFESSIONAL BUILDING(303) 9a9.5390
\,il40(l!r. Fred HibberdP.O. Box 1170Meeker, Colorado
Dear I'red:
I am enclosing herewj.th a Correction Notice which Ihave received from the Vail Fire Department. pursuant
to our telephone conversation, it is my understandingthat you will be back in torrn in two weeks and youwould be willing to meet with Diana Toughilt and
Gordon Swanson.
Will you please contact ne as soon as you arrive intovrn.
Sincerely yours,
JKP:pfEnclosurecc: D{ana Toughill
Gordon Swanson
Peterson
a.
Vail Fire Department
lown
P. O. Box 10O
vArL. COLORADO81657
CORRECTION NOTICE
Dale of original inspection:
.l r., r'.S+_ lle::lCW Dr.Building addres
Time served:
476-22W
476-5613
Exl.223
Dece{rber 22' 1977 D:crgnixar ].,5, 1977
Date served:
Building name:
Building owner:
\tillaqe Centcr "D"
Tr,:C 11.!hr"\: rri
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:
g ut{tronM FIRE CODE (U.F.C.) VIOLATIONS tr
tr NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (N.E.C.) VIOLATIONS tr
F OTHER t-tr'ifornr Bu-llcjinJ ffie
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PRACTICES
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:?r>beetiw:iiilss]jlc iir:s 13.310 C-5
2.; Storage of ocrbustar:les in stairsell LIFC 10.109::' 3.) Exit,r-ite..q burnei out IInC i0.1L3C'
4.) iiole in tj1.:ctrj-c 1,.c,xn cej.linqt ttEC 43C3-6, 5.) liol-e in tl"re r.la--'r-l of nai:r hall r-nC':308-At
6.) tFen elec.trical- i:o:es i'ff 370-1b-(c), 7') r'inproi:eeted s-'-nrcbural rrcri';:er 'LnlC 43-3 (B),
C.) iios,.: cablrets rl(Ji r..-aintajnecL LrfC 13.302 (A) , 3.) Uru-a'LeC- bciler lcr:r'i. Ccnr IIJC 1312t
f0.) fire Coors nct saintainecl L'FC 13.302A
ACTION REOUIRED TO CORFECT VIOLATIONS:Brilo vj.olations uP tr mde.
ilieas(i feel frrxr in *ho \hi I Fi::e DeparfierL if I ha./e an,t ".".reStiO1S
re:a::clincr Ure ejtve r'1ol.el-ions.
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY:5 :0C
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS
n.u.(@ oate:'.'ttilul;-.' 15. 1'978
OF THE U.F.C. 1973 EDITION
tr
o
VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
WATER & SAN. DEPT.
O VAIL POLICE DEPT.
tr PUBLIC SERVICE
tr PUBLIC WORKS tr HEALTH INSP.COPY TO:
VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT
EAGLE COUNTY INSPECTION REPORT I : ii i -l?iitfi i i#T't:iii:J i,x','lll'r.,
3. N,/A SlANDS FOR NOT APPLICABLE.
4. ANY NO ANSWTR SHALL BE SPECIIIED.
AND BUILDING.
C, D, OR COMBINATION.
NAMT OT BUSINTSS
OCCUPANCY NAMT OF OWNER /MANAGER
EMERGENCY
rnl,r,r: U
anrcr fl
CONCRfTE
MITAI
OIHiR
ROOF MAT.
!
C
]. ROOF OPTNINGS
2. rx|]s PnOVIDEO I rN oRotR
3.sTAIRWAYS PNOVIDED & IN ORDTR
!. EXIINGUISHIRS IN ORDER
REMA
NUAlEfR OF EACrI
5. ELECTRICAL SHUTOFf ACCESSIELE
9. ELIVATORS
6. VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL TIRE STOPS
7. TIRE DOORS PIOVIDED & IN ONDER
8. FIRE ESCAPTs PROVIDID 8 IN ORDER
TYII
NU MBTR
|lED /c tostg
LOCATION
ll. sMo$ oR HEqT D[trc]oR\
ELE RICAL
I. PROPTR WIRING
2. PKOPIR TXITNSION CORDS
3. PROPTR TOADS
HOUSEKEEPING
r. GOOD HOUSTKTEPINC
2. ADTOUAlI RUSBI)H CONTAINERS
]. PROPTR SIORAGt OF ASH€S
]]. LOCAT ALAR'
{. PROPIR STOKACT Of OILY RA6S
]O. SPRINKLER SYSTEM
12. FIRE DEPr CONr.ltCTION5
AL€RT DEVICT WORtiilNC
5. PROPTR SIORACE Of PAINTS
PROPTP CLtARANCf
9. PROPIR STOI,AGE OF HAZARMUS LIQUIDS CR GASES
'. pROetP 5lORAC.l Or PAC(NG MATIRIAI
/. PROPIR STORAcE OT IIU88 \H
8. PROptn STORACE OF AC|D5
]0. PPOTIR STORACI OF EXPLOSIVIS
|, PROPTR SIORAajt Of ftLM
I2. PROPER ITORAGT OI CitsfR
I. PROPTR ?IFING
PROPlii VtNIING
REMARKS
REMARKS
HAZARD NOTICf
?. HOr waltR iaNX
,r^CCt55l8tt
PROP!R VI}ITING
:], CO/I^EUSllON ArR souRct
REMARK
1, THE I]NDIRSIGNID. AM I!.I RECEITT OF A COPY OF TI]IS INSPECTIOII I'IOTICE AND AM AWARE OF THE PENALTIES
FOR []ON.COMPLIANCI OF AN} ORDERS LISTEO HTRION.
.o*roa,,ou, nnoo, \ lNsPtcrloN tr
aT rrMt oF / nc-rsetcrror ! orrr NO-- DArt
-
rs5ut0 BY
ALL STRUCTU RAL - WTRING - SANITATION AND HEAI-TH CONDITIONS SHOULD ALWAYS BE REFERRED TO THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU.
VFD-75 rr-,UITE. QI ItI NINI? TFNANf .ANAPY. FIPF DFPT PINK-FIRF PPEV BI,JREA,IJ
Vail Fire Department
lmn
P. O. Box 100
VAIL, COLORADO81657
476-2200
476-5613
Ext. 223
Date served:
CORRECTION NOTICE
Date of original inspection:
Building address:
Time served:
Building name:
Building owner:
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:
u uNrFoRM F|RE CODE (U.F.C.) VTOLATTONS tr
r] NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (N.E.C.)VIOLATIONS tr
N OTHER
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PRACTICES
DESCBIPTION OF VIOLATION:
ACTION REQUIRED TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS:
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL
BE COMPLETED BY:A.M. / P.M. Date:
RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U.F.C. 1973 EDITION
COPY TO:tr
tr
VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
WATER & SAN, DEPT.
tr
tr
VAIL POLICE DEPT.
PUBLIC SERVICE
tr PUBLIC WORKS O HEALTH INSP.
BUILDING OWNER/MANAG ER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER:
(Signalure)
(Signalure)( Tilte)
\v,
lorn
P. O. Box 100
vArL, coLoRADo 81657
It
VailFire Department
CORRECTION NOTICE
Date ot original inspection:
Building address:
Time served:
476-2200
476-5613
Ext.223
Date served:
Building name:
Building owner:
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:
B UNTFORM FIRE CODE (U.F.C.) VIOLATIONS O
tr NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (N.E,C.) VIOLATIONS tr
tr OTHER
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PRACTICES
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:
ACTION REQUIRED TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS:
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY:A.M. / P.M. Date:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTTON UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U.F.C. 1973 EDITION
COPY TO:
tr
VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
WATER & SAN, DEPT.
tr
tr
VAIL POLICE DEPT.
PUBLIC SERVICE
tr HEALTH INSP.
(Signalute)
tr PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER:
iSignatwe)
tuwn
This ofagainst
box 10O
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
office of the town attorney
July 28, L976
lilr. Fred llibbercl , Jr.General Delivery
Center, BuiJ-ding D
Hibberd:
ilsted to commence leqal action
buildingcontract,
you for certain violations of the fire code,code, and zoning ordinance and breach of the
provr-sl_ons.
.*
Please contact me or Diana Toughill within ten days ofthe date of this letter to resolve these problems. Ifsatisfactory resolution is not accomplished within thattime, I will ask the Town Council for authorization to
seek legal relief, including vacating the building becauseof the fire code violations.
Respectfully,
Lcn/qy
cc: /o!^nu ToughilI, ZoningBill Pierce, BuildingMichael Carlisle, Fire
-1 z^A/nlts1
--7+LL4/z-t-- rat t\.<- \rlr-1.-.--
'Aawrence C. Rider
Town Attorney
AdministratorOfficialChief
Eaqle, Colorador 81631
,"tt".," Re: Village
tNsPEC|clN FIEGIUEST
9415t . li-r' - .: ,',, .
E ornen D penrrnl. LocATroN
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
, " ,t.:: ,t / -. .
FBI AM PM
IIYAPPROVED n orsnpp Rov E D n nerNsPEcr
E uporrr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
Town of Vail
nr,$:cTRICAL PERMIT
Ng
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permit Fee
lnspection Fee
Total Fee i.:.- ..*.h-,.8)-..
DVl/
,l
Received By
THIS FORM IS TO
.tOB S|TE DURII{G
{)
Date of Application.... W,--..d-{--........................rg-..7.b......."-..
2L1 Electrical contractor..-.- 7,*t il*tUtU-.,..V*,- -
APPROVALS
/.:?1:7.4Dat€
BE POSTED OlI
col{STRUCTION
24 HOI,'RS ADVAIIICE NOTICE
REQI.'IRED rlDR INSPECTIONS
$....-.......-......-....---.
s...... "/"5A,.-4) -....
$.........ciO"'.-4).....
3 V''ue/-
rxr c. F, H!acrtL a!.r tarv!l !ro.5r
tuwn
This ofagainst
box 10O
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
office of the town attorney
July 28, L976
lilr. Fred llibbercl , Jr.General Delivery
Center, BuiJ-ding D
Hibberd:
ilsted to commence leqal action
buildingcontract,
you for certain violations of the fire code,code, and zoning ordinance and breach of the
provr-sl_ons.
.*
Please contact me or Diana Toughill within ten days ofthe date of this letter to resolve these problems. Ifsatisfactory resolution is not accomplished within thattime, I will ask the Town Council for authorization to
seek legal relief, including vacating the building becauseof the fire code violations.
Respectfully,
Lcn/qy
cc: /o!^nu ToughilI, ZoningBill Pierce, BuildingMichael Carlisle, Fire
-1 z^A/nlts1
--7+LL4/z-t-- rat t\.<- \rlr-1.-.--
'Aawrence C. Rider
Town Attorney
AdministratorOfficialChief
Eaqle, Colorador 81631
,"tt".," Re: Village
tNsPEC|clN FIEGIUEST
9415t . li-r' - .: ,',, .
E ornen D penrrnl. LocATroN
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
, " ,t.:: ,t / -. .
FBI AM PM
IIYAPPROVED n orsnpp Rov E D n nerNsPEcr
E uporrr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
Town of Vail
nr,$:cTRICAL PERMIT
Ng
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permit Fee
lnspection Fee
Total Fee i.:.- ..*.h-,.8)-..
DVl/
,l
Received By
THIS FORM IS TO
.tOB S|TE DURII{G
{)
Date of Application.... W,--..d-{--........................rg-..7.b......."-..
2L1 Electrical contractor..-.- 7,*t il*tUtU-.,..V*,- -
APPROVALS
/.:?1:7.4Dat€
BE POSTED OlI
col{STRUCTION
24 HOI,'RS ADVAIIICE NOTICE
REQI.'IRED rlDR INSPECTIONS
$....-.......-......-....---.
s...... "/"5A,.-4) -....
$.........ciO"'.-4).....
3 V''ue/-
rxr c. F, H!acrtL a!.r tarv!l !ro.5r
Vail Fire Department
lnrn
P. O. Box 100
vArL, coLoRADo81657
476-2200
476-5613
Ext.223
Date served:
CORRECTION NOTICE
Date of original inspection:
Building address:
Time served:
Building name:
Building owner:
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COVERS THE FOLLOWING:
tr uNrFoRM F|RE CODE (U.F.C.) VTOLATIONS Et
N NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (N.E.C.) VIOLATIONS tr
tr OTHER
SAFETY VIOLATIONS
UNSAFE PRACTICES
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION:
ACTION REQUIRED TO CORBECT VIOLATIONS:
CITED CORRECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY:A.M. / P.M. Date:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN FURTHER ACTION UNDER THE PROVISONS OF THE U,F.C. 1973 EDITION
COPY TO:n
D
tr
tr
VAIL BLDG. DEPT.
WATER & SAN. DEPT,
VAIL POLICE DEPT.
PUBLIC SERVICE
tr PUBLIC WORKS tr HEALTH INSP.
BUILDING OWNER/MANAGER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER:
!Senatute)
(Sj9natute)(Title )
ao
PLUMETIN 0'-,/.o
L(5Ir$/4ECHANTCA
TOWN OF VAIL
PEFIMIT
4-tc-'7.{-(r-JNAME \_ C_,i-\ t-e C-^Johr4('rrh S
Q,v al <--
rRAcroR -P>.rv a. f (- /-[ . nf t n-2. pHoNE
USE OF BUILDING:
LASS oF woRK: I rrrew Enoornoru fl nemooel E nepnrn
lpiloNoFWoRK: d.JJ rr.,.I hc'.J4" l=-bnt[c-7
#Z|L
! neenoveo
TOTAL FEES: $
E orsnppnoveo
NG: NUMBER MECHANIGAL: NUMBER
vALuAnoN$ 7A?(a. C,C>
PERMIT FEE
-{t- s "
7.fa
DArE /- le - 7t
/
off ice of the town manager
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 476.s613
August'14, 1975
Mr. Fred Hibberd
Hibberd Construction and Development
1127 Race Street
Denver, Colorado
Re: Certificate of 0ccupancyVillage Centre - Building D
Dear Fred:
I,le are issuing the Certificate of 0ccupancy wjth the express understandingthat the lofts in units2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 71 8, 9, L0, L2, 13, 15, are not to be
usdd for any purpose unti'l it can be determined whether or not they
can be nade legal according to code.
Chief BuildinQ -0ff icia1
Rec i eved
fu-/4-arJ-+,4
[VlX'uLi't,$
t+;-",fut|;**;1;/rul
FrediHibberd
Hibberd Construction Co.w;
rNsPEtrTtoll meouEsr
rowN oti #1,,-
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
I ornen f] panrrel. LocArroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
MON
COMMENTS:
WED THUR PMFR
/a.
E nppRovED ! nEtNSPEcr
t
lnwn
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
August 'l 4, 'l 975
Mr. Fred tlibberd
Hibberd Constructionll27 Race Street
Denvern Colorado
Re: Certificate ofVillage Centre
Dear Fred:
office of the town manager
and Development
0ccupancy- Building D
I.le are issuing the Certificate of 0ccupancy with the express understandingthat the 'lofts in units2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, !2, L3, 15, are not to be
usdd for any purpose until it can be deternined whether or not they
can be made legal according to code,
Rec i eved-/*ruJ
FrediHibberd
Hibberd Construction Co.
tNsiPEc+N
TOWN,OF
FIEBIJEST
VAIL
.:DATE , .' *JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
n ornen Ipnnnnu LocAnoN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRITUE AM PM
COMMENTS: -.. t ,j'
-E app RovED ! orsnerRovED
Elorolt rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTIoNS: i. r ,,
CORRECTIONS
fl nrrNsPEcr
''|'.'
INSPECTOR
FIECTUEST
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
rNsPEc'fr,.,
TOWN
florxen
MON
COMMENTS:
n pnnrrlu LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WApp RovED E orsappRovED ! nerNSPEcr
fl upon rHE FoLLowrNG coRREcroNs:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
,.: ,,
t\' 'rl' 1.), ), l, t-"' /' \r .,,P. O. BOX 667 . VAil-, COLORADO 81657
. Jul.y 3l , 1975
To: Fred Hibberd
Fromr ceci I Botson subjeet; vi I lage center
The follmlng ii an atte*rpt to sumarize itemo tofri"f,eorre€ting or cmpleting. Very I ittle has been donatsards reduclng the I lst* I ihinh it is irnportaatv'te rrcet ds soon as possibla to revier theee.' .
Punch List
ncad
recent I ythat
EUILDI!*G A : :
l. The plpe stlcking out frca thc front of the buildinqis a hazzard to ev€ryqrc Ftking !f . lt also probabf y fiuts'. ussi ln non csfomence with th- f ir€ codg.
?. The n€u trash rom needs cmBletion and ttre previouslocEtion of the old ons needs reFinishing;. . '
3. . A-drain needs to be instal led f rsn the lot* point oftJre qider**l in front_of the NE door; '.
4. 5 c^*,24- lS sf,LL -O4.-E'- 7 .f *tz t,4,
I: The drcr
2. Divertersbal con I es.
BUILBING B
----rEts tho trash roon needg replacillg; 1.-.''
need to be Instqlled on tha roof aUova aH
'be installed around windcus w€lI on
off wal t around transfornrar betreen(tt is my understanding youn:men
3. Ra i I i ng sha,rl dttr side.
4. Boards missingBuildings A and B.rerror d them, )
EISerigg
l. Water dralns
2. lron railing
BUILD$*6 g
into Unit tG.
needs painting in front of Unit lG.
Vi I lageJuly 31,
Page 2
,o
Center Punch List
1975
3. Electric cover on lJ outside outlet needed.
4, Plaster not flnished at bottsn of Building in front ofUnit lK,
5. Plaster on alcoves on West end of building not finished
on top of alcove.
6. Paint peel ing off of wlnd*s on West side of building.
7. Trash dump noeds plaster and roof.
B. Clean cement off plaster alt around building.
9. Plaster and paint retaining *all in back
10. Pldster and paint slde of NE steps.
ll. Install railing on NE stept.
12. Finlsh storage closet, Install doors, etc.
13. Repair sevncnal large crackg In plaster around building.
14. lnstall numbcrs on outgide dsors.
Fj rst Fl oor
| 5. Finish insidg
16. Repalr watEr
17. Flx swiming
S-ecsmd Fl ogr
18. Second floor
Thi rd-fJ-ogJ
19. Paint peel ing
Fourth Floor
garden, Replace broken drain pip€.
lealr In cell ing,
pool lines in Eguipr*nt Rom.
balcsrt rail ing needs cleaning or painting.
off ceiling due to water leak.
20. Board holdlng broken plaster in ceiling.
2l'. Wood cover on ! beam off.
,e
Village Center Punch ListJuly 3l , 1975
Page l
22. Paint peel ing off ceil ing due to hrater leak.
23. Fire hose missing and outlet broken.
Eifth Sloor
24. Patch bel*r flre hose bad.
Stairwells
Zr. Hun€rou$ sPots in sta i rwel I s need plaster and paint'
Roof
26. Rssf drainr off illl sidc into court yard, creating lce
rink.
Electrical
27. Sc;|!8 outside I ights on all the tirn€. others don't corna
on at al l.
s!,il+fl rt6 PooL_s{gJ | ogsAs!
t. Clean swiruning pool coplng.
2. Grates.i fer*'.d.r:diins So{th and }lorth sicie of I Euilding.
3. Steel stru€ture of stairs do*n to swlrming Pool between
Buildingr B and C needt painting.
4. Retalning r*al I North of iool needs Plaster
5. One ss€tian of sidaalk between Buildings
on North side has sunk and needs replaclng.
LAt*ggcAPul6
Are al I of the aspen in?
Where are the evergrecns?
Lor spot in front of unit 16.
Lor, spot In front of unlt lJ.
g$E4S
and paint.
AandB
ti is stilt too early to prePare a detailed punch llst for
this bui ldiSrS but thire afe several nraJor questions that
need resolvlng.
,o
Vlllage Center Punch ListJuly 31 , 1975
Page 4
l. Hhen will the driveway to the lower level be cornpleted?
2. What finish rrlll be applied to the exposed concrete onSouth side of the garage?
3. Enclosure for'stairwell in front of Building A.
4. Enclosure for sr*all stain*ell in front of Bulldlng B.
5. Leaks into upper garag€ and thcn into lo|*€r garage.
9. Sw parking sp.acer are srneller than code and sm havebecn obstructed with equipnent,
Cecil P. Dotson
3 C Vi I lage Center
476-2162
July ?5, 1975
TO HHOH IT I.IAY CONCERI{:
This letter ls to certlfy that Village Centre, Bu'llding
"0'*ols not wlthln the 100-Year Flood Plaln. Buildlng "0"is outlfned in red on the attached copy of a portlon ofnGore Creek Flood Plaln Information" prapared by ttydro-
Trladu Ltd,for the Tswn of Vall and approved by the Col-
ora{o }later Consewation Board.
If ygu have aqy further questlons, please don't hesitateto contact me.
Si ncerelY,
DEPART?4E!{T OF
CO},SIUHITY DEVELOPMENT
Olana 5. Toughill,
Zontng Adminls,tretor
0sTlJlq
enclosure
\
o
VILLACE CENTER ASSOCIATION
P. O. BOX 667 VAIL, COLORADO 81657
March 19, 1975
Mr. Jim LamontMr. Kent Rose
Town of VailVail, Colo. 8.|657
Dear Jim and Kent:
Enclosed is a copy of the letter that I have sent to Mayor Dobson
and the planning comrnission. I would like to thank both of you
very much for spending the time with Jack Curtin and I. I wouldfurther ljke to thank you, Jim, on behalf of the Association foryour presentation to our Annua'l Meeting. It was extremely wellrecejved. Jim, I saw a qreen book jn Hibberd's model apartment
which haci all the drawings of the Vail Plan. Is it possible thatI could have a copy of that for use in discussing the Vail Plan
wi th Association members?
As soon as the cotton woods get green and the dead branches can beidentifjed, we would certainly apprec'i ate your trinming out all the
dead wood in front of Vil'l age Center. It was a real eye sore lastyear and hopefully when the trimming is done they will come back
strong as you suggested.
Thanks again to both of you for all your he1p. I hope that we can
push forward with these things I have outlined in the letter to themayor. I have got to go back to Texas for the next three months,but if anyth.ing should arise concerning Vii'l age Center area please
contact Jack Curtin. Jack wi'l I contact either me or the other
appropriate members of the Association.
Very truly yours,
tL
\'tli''lN
'PEC
TroN r<FauEsT
UILPI N6.MEcuaxrcALC orre re
Req.1?+1rr're
n lnue1r<o.x
D VEHEST<
n Koor
B Vo,<7at
Loc,+1roru:
17*ur.,ngll.:g-
n Rouet+'
u 2IAN7P|P6 VtrC
D Frruau
E 6.r.Tral
Localor.l:.
I
1
tr FcolNc-
fI Fourua,+1tor.r
tr FFAMINe
! FlHn-u
, E P,o..r<T:^u
Loceltotrt:
E oluer<
I Veu1,.,+1'onl
fl t-{eo.lorc-
I Hooas
tr
B7o,r<yi'e+-
Loc,+lrost:
E ?at<1,ar. Locqror.t
FsAV-Y Fo -ENIl€cTtoN
vEV TUu( Ft<t (i_Fm
LOMMEN]-9:I
l
I
- /\??RovE?o l7.rqf??r?ov e? x* ru* F:E' T
Co"ee.losi l
--7r', /-t-UAre i-t' /' | / 7z
--_
r,.l \'tl i,'l l\i VILLACE CENTER ASSO
o
CIATION
P. O. BOX 667 . VAIL, COLORADO 81657
l,iarch l9 , -l975
The Honorable John A. Dobson
Town of Vail
Vai1, Colorado 8.l657
Dear Mayor Dobson:
I am ulriting you in my capacity as President of Village Center Association.
The Association represents the three buildings, comprising 56 condominiums,
located south of East l4eadow Drive and east of ldillow BridEe Road.
At our annual meeting held l,larch 'l , .|975, Jjm Lamon" presenteci a very fine
program on the l4aster Plan of Vail. As a result of that nresentabion and
bur-discussion afterwards our Associat'ion urould l.ike to express thejr un-
animous feelings to you.
I'le compietely endorse the pedestrian plan as shown on the l4aster Plan. lrle
would'l ike to encourage the acceleration, if possible, of this p1an. lie
understand there are complicat'ions in clos'i ng East l'leadow Drive from Cross-
roads to Vail Road. It is our understanding that the plan for th'is summeris to close [ast Meadou Drive from Poor Rjchards to lledel Inn. ble would
like to reconmend that you exienO the closing of East l'leaciol Drive vtest
to its in'uersectirrn with !,Jillow tsridge Road. l'le wculd also like to en-
courage your closing llii'l ovr Bridge Road immedjately._ It is our understand-
ing that-closing this road does not oresent the complications that closing
the balance of East Meadow Drive does.
The conCjt.ion of Gore Creek Cirectly south of Village Center is of prime
interest to the Assocjation. At one time thjs area was poncied by the dam
under the foot bridge. This raised the water level which contributed to
ki'l f ing sone of the-cotton vrocds and tlrreaten'ing the 'l ocige pole pine. -Be-cause 6f th'is the ciecjsion was nade by the city to not put in the dam last
summer. !..1e suonort that decision. 0ur Assocjation would unanimously like
to see the strbam restored to jts original natural condition with large
boulciers and rushjng t'rater like at the Covered Bricige. This woulci free
up a large area on the south side vrhich is nothing but gravel and rocks
and most-unattrac^uive in the summertime. I'le would suggest this area shoulci
be filled in so that the park area could be ajmost doubled in size. If
t^lillow Bricige Road coulci be closed to traffic, as recommended above' the
pedestrian bridge ancl the dam in front of V'i 1'l age Center could be renoved
since neither ttoulci be needed.
'.,?.
Village Center Association - L-14arch .l9, i975
This spring the Village Center c;mp1ex will be totally landscaped.
l'Je would like to see our landscape p1 an intergrated vrith the city's
deve'l oornent of Gore Creek and park directly south of the complex-
Jim Lamont anci Kent Rose have met with me and other members of the
Association and have been very helpful .in Ciscussing the Vi1'lage
Center area. Our objective is to have a conciominiun complex that
not only we but a'l I other resjdents and visitor s can take pride in.
I'le would welcome the opportunity of participating in any planning
meet'i ngs that relate to the area arounci Viliage Center.
Very truly yours,
||tL
cc: Jim Lamont
Kent RoseVail Planning Commission
DOTSON
Pres i den t
I!t
b-fu' Yg- +S* e4 a
-fu-u-&. &u,.,arffixw%
/o /??gI
B*
7'%a-
.:i ;,1
'i r';:i
i;.
,l'
",ok C
.rFr l/ .1,. OKL'"r ok''n,
BEN -- :ffil''ili'ryffi::;i.lili; 1-1';3'?lTffiT:.li;,L{"tn$'ll"
vILLAGE CET.JTER p- t t)f ttursc lwzrTe<:fltx)
llorth
11, hr .
1r2 hr.
ex it
dr.
dr-
or.
from stairs needs a ggsp Slzy
from stairs to corrn,
at trash room on commercial level
at telephone & electric room commercial
QF-
tl,"rr^ df( 6, chcck nn south east end of b,,ild'ing on-wheee-+ir.e-glas-ryses--
..',f.7 outside rails along sidewald at entrnace to lower parking south sideV\-IC( 3, chee1erffitffiffg*type-'rfur-ext e.r",i oa'.,.woo &-r*t i n g,, z- f-,
tl
':j.". 6K 1, trim out dry wall ,around door to goldsnith shop"ls. I2,,.- , , ,.."tL'.,.' lotrim dry wall onall doors 7\J t- SLTi Gc;*
tt: -. - :' 1,. -f{ EAIEK- -!l' 6fi,/1.mount area-4#-closer to ceiling in the east side of corrnercial entrance
^'t (i'|oql.Il'\i O K f?,barrier on window at stairs -t5 residential leve'lt/meet al I rail requirements
i*ti; g( p.caps & spark screens on all firepalce flues
,;.,' OK tff'hook uP all dishwashers
:ri:'.
j'& fi. smoke detector in Unit l4ttZ'P | |
i. L"*4 fu),outside fluelinet'in unit I I )la"'/ l'-<r-:" ') Q"8
\,tfux 9t,f :nish f ireplace enclosures of al, t.{;i)^ff.
.
fl/,sink in Unit 117 also ajr gap vacuume-6]dfff,- Tvir '\""'l!'c""1 '
.:;ji. ./{ Q};1ab at entry to first level of parking
':' @K 2Qsnoke detectors must be moved to highest point in unit.
"K /r1 /./h/7 ? n *t /- Ua'e a fi'/
t-'7 r'r: "''-| ,/'/1
' ./':14'7i rr"
.'.,/
+'^ /,4
----rt'/'-;*.r./",t.;;' , L. / r't. '. "/t/ ./ ./ . t /\-t/'/'t/'t
a
I LDING '' D"
Check List for Final InsPection
l. North exit from sta'irs needs a step
'
2. lta hr. door from stairs to commercial space
3. 1rz hr. door at trash roon on commerc'ial level
1u" hr. door at telephon.e & electric foom in,conrnercjal area
5. Check on southeast end of the building on where wire glass goes
:ri,
6. 0utside rails along sidewalk are needed at entrance to lower parking on the south
7. Check building type for exterior wood rating
;..B. Trim out drywall around door to Goldsmith Shop
9. Trim drywall on all doors
10. Mount area heater closer to ceiling in the east s'ide of commercial entrance
ll. Barrier on window at sta'irs at residential level shoulci meet all rail requiremenl
12. Return all hand rails to wall
13. lrz hr, door at residential level on stairs in needed
14. 1rz hr, door at trash room in residential space in needed
.|5. Check on soldered drains at residential level
l6.caps & spark screens are requ'ired on all fireplace flues
17 . Hook uP a'|1 d j shwashers
.|8. Smoke detectors needed in Un'it 14
.|9, Outside flue liner needed in Un'it 1
.20. F'inish fireplace enclosures on all fireplaces
21, Sjnk in un'it l1 needs to be fixed up, also air gap vacuum breaker
t..
22. Slab at entry to first level of parking :
23. Smoke detectors must be moved to highest point in the units
24. Lofts
?-5. 0ccupancy in Unit 9 -- must be vacated
i:
I
mL ,{ * uts
-\
..-r< |94re *ji -.-l r' - ,"-*' .1sgx
T1ME REGE;VE9l- -:, , AM,?iii.,
Donen
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE
E pnnrrnl.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
THUR FRI AM'PM ,,
APP ROVED
D upolrr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECTIONS
E orsnppRovED n nerNsPEcr
DATE
INSPECTOR
?nn NH4llwz ru2 .tlt^ ladlt|l
!
e
II
it
I
L !.i i3enb ! iii i iit t ii
t
6
I
li
rl
it
I
..\ \l\\I
-\ -t\ -\|
-.\\\
I
c-
tl'lr
ts
:l#Ert
oo Ll
zllIlrIt.
'Et,,'Lt I
A[F- si'E i
H
bJ.
{+-3oE
ts3*
,\r
JI
v:iga
Y2a
ari.\
L --+i \tf\
\l)
d\\
\ \-";<in-\ \-'o'v>\ \
\\ \it! '\tir?r
\tl
,- j$
*-
-tt t !. l,(--l i
iT
it
I
E
Itltlrl*l
8.
Fl
bJ
:l2l
utlJI
tt
TI
=2
=;rl
5g
So
33
bo
!i i- : -i!:.r, ,r -Eil".1!i Eis ii:i:5 j!ilil:""i,..:; il!;ii :1:s;iii=:g:hil:i ssi l:iio: r':!tlr:'..::;tiii,,.'; I2i rlil$: il:l!cii"-....-.-. =-- d,r... i, i i i , ; . t.,. ; i 5 " 1.. :. i 13ir ;:;.'E; ^;-'rrstri;!;s;:i!ilii :l':;r! s:liiiilll:l!Cl;i:q|E :€:i;8 *::"::ir':;i';t;;riE-i'9t:-r; -E;;:q";j3'-,' !....lFiE:; ::st:j iilii:ijElFlliit:tr!; ililie lrrill:eitlljiliEisii ;;i;:i l!!;iii;!iii1:1;;;!;: ;Itii; ::ig;ii;;iE:t;ijii!.P 9.'i. o ;'t!.'lg;:i iirli; i:i:;:;a:illlii:iiec-e;:i :*1t6!"rt:i6.,'lis:rEi; :tlili :iir;iEii"-"'!r.. r:!t liiEil lrl"i.!;t;i'.eii;1i'saI:i HI::3:. l"i:a!i.Eli:pliE:::i!! ::i:t; seli::jig[.::ii,5!ils";: !:;:;i i3;i;13!;;i;i! i;:iEi;J "i: i,:? E i ! ; * : ' : - ; I s i - - .: I i : i:; li: a!:. ii!i;i1-;!iiii:i:::Bi... "1!i:;rE,l:Lii:i'l;!! iii;iii ::i;;::r!;irii:li;:
- .e ct;.i3E! 8.,_3..i.ii'.!-5sii..i;Usil: iir;lE; ;i:!;ii;i:!i;iii:iEii "?ii sdid;tA !:L::-P 3;.1: I 5 3.'-'-::ii iii ;rt;;*: ::i;;!:;:l;;:!ii;;r:
d ii; ;;iili; il;r:riii:r:iii;!r:I i;; El;r;i; irgiri:i:ltr:siigiEB ilE 5l33i5I $!!;il;iJi:3'tl!E;=
s
rltltlllIIilr.lt-
b3
rtl
3f{
Hil
"1-
={-'199{
8iLF!l
EEIilJ\--l
'to
:fitEi!
E5;'
.E Et> e
r.ll-ll
<t\
{i.a-.r{lri
={s:t
8itFitit !
i&
:qi; E!!
8 - t.r
E = *fr;
te,
!9e
?=3-ot
r re
rt$
iE3;,5
g'8
1.:e
:af
igu
+ "6,
F:!!l--i;i J E'E
H e ?5;$ ,?H;
E ERE
- 149ll lr:E ts-E t:![ l;!r lsEr.*
a'"5
rt tfr
;3E"
.8SE
...H
H: r.
rH ll
5* I I
-trrl
ar tl5' l l;{ ll
HH,PA
a{
,..t
Hd
fi|,l,,,',"'"o
9l2l
zrl
al
|llIgl\t
oz
E
=cllJo-
c
oc(n(\I
oo
o
(\t.-{
(tPoP
DD
r)N
an
UJ
IJJlJ-
ts
=E
UJo-
.ryH./i7tg
sfco
c{
NtJ
LG
Ci6+)
an'i
v.
UJ
F
Dz
o
(,
=
oUJFozoz6)_
o
.!oz2
dulz3o
ulIFoz
ooc7)@
E
=
.v(J(o-)
EIe; Idq I€rlc!! |
€=& \
iE{Fe.\
e,.: \"{:;N;H\cc {l
.eEx\;;, N
:€'={
PF
E€oo F30E(U ctlor.5 E:E .d
+'=3d o! _ (,/)(,) E ..
.eEBXE'= ot-i o.itt -, = I
:ss;
- 9oo
E (d s=
i Eee
j-o
E6g'=OrUl
g8E
Ef;gE:F
EEEc-o
.8:5:sed'! =e96'- o. -c
EsE
EEE.FoO
gE;
tq! c.=- (6
cL(5 o-
$EE
INF Q.EfieE6:EE Eg 6-6
EEF
eeC(6 O'-.c; oP-E
$€Eo?!
'6>9 6a
Tfi EhtP9rEocEg
-o6
rr)(\Iro
srsf
Lr)
t\r\(\I
(f)
o
OO()
Oo
oro(\l
rr)
s:
r.o
(o
==Etll
z
J
xoul
z
J
9
F
uJ
tr
(,z
!o
=
o-
z
uJ
UJ
uJll.z
tr
IJJe
uJ
E
ID
'g
uJe,20
qJ
6oo-uJo
z
UJ
x
F
UJo
(n
uJ
UJt!
tr
=Er.uo-
J
FoF
oz6J
to
JI&t-ou,lJul
(9z6
=JL
J
z
UJ:
NOrrvntv
tfi
n = 1'1
:to$Eei. * gH-t7 - {l
EE
= = E{tr^62lp g
= Ed.t o E !.1
F ? Efi
H g EE
HNO
-lq'!
s.,1,r_l
!,1o+l
an
'EIZ
!
E
a
t
z9F
{IL
UJ
<)
<l
@sf
oo<f.-{
Ol
oq
o(oo
|r,(\I
UJ
r5
z
E
z9F
uJF
3gJz
tltltlttaEzlz9s??6o<
=Poo<z
u,F2..
2=
EO}GOI
i@l
L .nl
lltlTItlt_ll*ll-l1llJ.+l(rl| .tr I| -o'J
I c., I
| 'r- |I q-lr--t
Itl
lollolldt
llJl
=
!,
zYI
F
IJJo.
2
F
5oz
tltl-l -l.-l ..r
l
I
I-Tt
I_t-.ol *I c-{tnlol-4-
-..1t-l =(ul
-ol
.t_ |6l =9lJI<l31,'!loxlOllllaE
o
o3
a
I
I
z1
{l:-.,
+
zFIcl
(\lr{(\I
(\lot\
@1r)(f,=l.-1.
-\l
fl
71
F\l4
z1
x
cl uJo
rr)I
Et-e(H
tt(l)P!gooP!,!f+
I(dP+rc.Itfi5(l)t!J
c\I
@rtoO
UJF.
@@o?zo
Fo-lllY
uJo
o.F
E
=E
IJJ(L
i-l8ilt;l
HHzo
z
rn )lzz.
=z=>dP
ifi(r()=
=13;;E
E
ut
5--AE2E<o'l€ae9ttt
5EE drFF=ti.u=o dfr: >di 8u9 EutE XO-E X>t q-
€=
ut@o
:l:t!
----
E
=E,lrlo-zIF(JfEFazo()
ntrn
=.1ol
r.ut
5l
3lltlol
fl
I
I
I
?loll!lcl
JI
<l>l
rr-Iol
pl p
<\l(\l
(\l
I(o(\l
Or
I
IL!lorlr{l
I
"l=.1oluJl
5lal>l
Ir-|olzl3l
ONFI
!
(u
IJJ
o
Ec
l!
tU
F6
o
UIUI
oa
trC
.F)=E
at
(a(o<rIrr.or>sr
o(-)
E
+,U-
t/1
@(\l
Nct,
I
(\I
Ot
dt(\I
.iz('ulrr
J
ILoz3oF
.|.(n
oL)
PrnLo
(u
lnrd
:ctr
Pl:l
sllUl
FI>l
I,-l
ro
gz
=u-
IJco
I
I
I
I
'1
Fo
o)!o
oE
+J
(t
LrJ
L(IJ+)
o,(J
(U
d
trJ
=zo
-)
I,(f)r(f)IF
o
=
oa.v.(J(d
tro
J
(oG
oU'
r\t\or
oz6
=J.L
z
7()Iu
=
0lirg+t t-Oz oo
Jt<oQFF?
=Eil,,tro()
G,-rO<F(E()ur<ZEUJF.qZ
g*
uJ
=(d50oo
trE!
N
0si
\41
nl
s$\
"{\l
I
I
I\
I
|(t--o
'd
q
H
-lr.l,J IIJJ Iil
=lFI
ill
lu*
Jr=S
rl
I
It,il
r.l
N\
W
=r- - O CEriE9.'io(,);io
gEE: S
€;gE*F=E=3
€ 9EE=$
:e35::'i-pFs3:ig
E s= 5't
E EE: E
:-€ 3 5:o': o o r
= g-F ol!!in.'r!a- d = e=oE 6:;q:-oes X o-E
:tig$
:€e sts
:gEi;
.C= c, a, E
e€ie€6 i';o=
E !a;e:6F99
lE :e $EXi'=
iE$ia
,D
c
Ga
Co
I
I
0
\ri
sJ
VI
o
0
-\\$
p
Vl/+:h-r.1l
cDl
v9 l
Co
E\
o0
oc\tx
o
U
c\
vl
s.|'
q
\F
\rN
f-
uJ
zo
.D
-C)t!
z EFoUJJuJ
z
=
Frnri-
|-
EtJ
()z
uJ
=
tuUJltz
tr
uJ
UJ
o
=IutuJ
z
6
q.lrl
o-
z
uJ
x
F
uJo
t/,t!tul,L
Fr..{E\L!j
F
F
(5z
co
J
O
F
t4t
gJ
z
6
=
o-
NO|lvn']v
rl
I
I
I
ll,l
E
t!
{
'/)qa
i
\rc
'l
!
-o
=ZIL9ou,zto
=
uJo
J
UJzUJ(,
=>G
ar1=\ UrYo-g
z
-q3E82o=>E9rr-<
H3>QFO-.(\i
I
"{t:tt
h\i
\"\
q"\
.b\
\{(
z
J
<l+lqt
(,l
ulo-
s
.e\\F
O"\
g
$.\
q\o
e{
t^I-IE
IE
t:IKtlt<lz
IF
lo
;l
GluJlFI
"l^l
;lqtlzl
tltltttlotrzfzYOFr!<oo<OJ
=ilat
xrrXA<z
tllltl
=2..
9za-
d6eg
JI<lFIzl
S''
'zl
.. >loul
ulluz
E
l tlill
ll
ll
{\l
o(
c.{
c\
t.
.OoV)
\
wl
t
{.}
rlEleldt?t=t9
FIJI<lurqrt ot0, lo
I ll :
I ll ulr ll cll -rlt <il=
< Our Or <
it
$h
r*
*$
B€
E
zo9zecoo
=zd8!utr
b
tr,o,tto!? l!5(J2ZECIcl3nEt2a9.Er:-;0
=>F dtsE h=
I
.{
5
\q.I
\(t\
\
\\
u;
=z
(D
..'
\q
Itna
s*
ll\
o$
dQt\scFo
\o
i
\
-s\
=()
J
$z.l
oluJlrEl
3l
l!lolzl3l
el
\
\tw{
\\\(
\
A
-,Jl
ol
=.1(5l
uJl
3>l
rLlolzl
FI
\\
t\
\
\\
flEl
JI<l>l
g
otFI
I
l?l
{f,
dfl
.l
I
ul -
--.r O<Fsc)tlJ <ze,r!F
oo
5P
E?trgtrJ+
IJOo
G2?
=fJZrro()
oF(J
Fz
C)
o
*Xrr (!o2 o()
.^i5Z=2FF-<
=Hg
ae
=o.=>EIF'oE h=o dilE =o-r u5oF,.,E Xo-r x>P ilFo-ti
lt,
@oF
J_,QJ
0)
-
U,)
v
\-o-?
--.J
rR\ v/il=\z/J=
=!DD
luwn u Iltl
CERTIFIED MAIL
offlce ol communltY develoPmenl
August 8, .|986
Mr. Fred Hibberd, Jr.
Hibberd Construction Company
1977 South Park Route
Jackson, Wyoming 83001
Re: Completion of Iandscaping and crosswalk at the Village Center project.
Dear Fred:
According to the improvement agreement for Vil1age Center, the landscaping,
crosswalk, and drainage work were to be completed by July 1, 1986. At this
time, the drainage work js complete. However, the crosswalk and landscaping
are not finished. Below is a list of work that is incomplete:
l. The landscaped area on the northeast corner of the project is not
finished. The revised arrangement of the sidewalk is not complete'
Also,9 aspen trees and sod are required according to the p1an. I have
enclosed a copy of thjs portion of the approved landscape plan so that
you know exactly which area I am talking about. The existing concrete
sidewalk must a] so be removed in this area.
2. The crosswalk connection between Crossroads and the Vil'l age Center
project is not finished.
I would like to know if you have any plans to complete these two portions-of
the project. Please let me know your intentions by August 13, 1986. It is_-
hoped that the Town will not be forced to use the letter of credit to actually
do the Iandscape project and crosswalk. However, if this does become
necessary, the'Town wil'l draw on the $3,905'l etter of credit by September l,
1986 in order to complete this work. In addjtion, the Town will not issue any
fjnal certificate of occupancies for the Village Center project until this work
is completed. I hope to hear from you soon.
75 soulh fronlage road
vall. colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
z
Sincerely,rr I nl
{nrh^trfu
Kri stan Prit
Town Pl anner
KP: br
Enc'l osure
Ch ief Bui'lding 0f f i ci al- ' -
f
\il"L1l"t f'6.*-pW-
Srh^ofto'rtl
t!;'{&r='"'t;rr
OW STORAGE
a?-= .= Ita:a
Sio- --
'4- e?'ag'
t-..-'-- \:
-tnt'
FROIVT EXFANsIoNs
'-z -e ?j4 ( i.zA.!t)
-r'E- -- &t;7,O
"ANTreuE"
LAMP A POST
{glpinclvn
gJagg&fuiurof, co.
Gail & Larry Allon, Owners
(3(ts) 827-5518 Auto . Glass . Tub Enclosures . Glass
P. O.-Box 370
Minturn, CO 81645
#*&
fl- *- 6-"ZA X44 4- f^.;*. {
4a 1/a 3/y4 s-> ?Zr tZ;"ue 6 fuda Z7kA-#-
7/.;1/"V' e '.^-A. -9/f-" 6-,-1- /o - jo - &>- *.4
./rz " 4Zt "- 4-.4j7 ;t-h-.,
Z';-P/u1
lnttn
4!l wrl meedow drlve
Yrll, colorsdo 81657
(308) r76-22m
Septemlcer 20, 1984
q,restions re: Village Center Buildjng D
llre deparlmenl
l.
2.
2
4.
5.
Fire rating for existing garaEe
Access to garage with saeen wall
Fjre alarm systern for total building
Emergency lighing and qrit lightjng
Roof:
- Cornection to Sonnenalp
- Cons truct ion
- Draft stotr)
Dick Drran
Boyle Enginconing , Inc.
143 E. Meadour 0r. Suitc N-10Uail, Colorado 81857
302/ 478-2170
To : l'1r , 6ary Murra i n
Tor^rn of Uai I Bui l ding Dept .
?5 S. Frontage Rd. tlest
Uai I, Colorado 81657
- - -.- --. ljrte:0ctober g, 1984
SubJeci, Ulllage Center
Improvement s
Dean Gary '
This is to confirn that I have revleued the condition at the ncu north
foundation r,ralls of the above noted project. As you knou the vertical
reinforclnq r,rao placod at 48" o,c, in lieu of the lE' o.c. speclfiod.I
have instnucted lvlike to backfill the interior side of this r,rall the sone
height aE the earth to be retalned on the extcrior. This uay thero urill not
be any lateral load due to the differontial retainage and the vertical
reinfoncing r,riIl be adequate at 48" o.c. If you have any questlonr
regarding ihis oatter please call me.
I J Please Reply f-Ho ."otv neceoEary
ct
=
ts
=t
UJc
oo
(\l
anuJ
IJJlJ-
tr
=UJo-
/-V1,h./r3/ te/bp
6ql2e #Tt)
I
$
Si- t' .< (\,lO .-lji;
$ulrS cuto (d
NE
g
gJF
Eot-
OE
z
o
z
oUJ
z
z
6
=
@
.g
oz
ulz3
u,lIFoz
Eo.c
-9-o(g
.9a.o-'6
'oFo,
oo
0)ac(5c€
o
o
o
E
((t
q)Eoo
o)
=to
E
o
=c
d(D
o.6
'.9
E
-i- o c6*6.9
B H€:
*; cEE.= 6 -tr1.=Oe 6P:0c-o>
i$Ei€ >=:c96FIoSo
3 5;.;
E E-Fl
EE; g
E!tecL (5 cL-sEreoiE-ors*e5E6:i
:EEH*cEei,!=;
- o-.Y o
(! 0'- .ic; o o
STEE
E g;E
*ffi
eEgg
- o 6J
oo
(7)
oqoN
oo oq
(')st
E
=uJ
(tz
=
IoUJ
z
J
J
()
tF
uJ-)uJ
(9z
aoI
J
)
2
u-
u.lult!zoF
UJ
v:.
E
o@
=I
uJtz
6IJJo
F
UJ
z
ulJ()
x
F
uJo
oul
UJl!
E
=uJL
J
Fo
F
z6
f
Co
J
9EFC)UJ
ul
oz(o:fJo-
J
2
aqJt
NOUVntVA
I.ut.&)l
afI(u+fq
c.lo
o)t-
E€
o
(!
!
Yc.
;ZZtLo ootr ^ 62.g 5 :9F9 6E
.tocZ!(Joon(JzXl!<og iH6 s.>9 2
dcrc'
->E
A.-l''
a?$
zoF
u-
(9
L
tr,lA
F
oo
OO(\l
trt
uJ
z9Eoo
x
z9F
qJ
3ulz
I\l
s;rF
z
tr
d\gt\o
8
I
a
=zl
z
={lJi
N+{i
.,q
c4.4
ci(4
t'
I
I
E
=
=IuJ
f=l
t*
Htt-t,\tal
i++ntl+tl
tr+
IADtqtll..ltzltoltFlt<ltJl
tolt=l
l{S',.1
w.K=-l
F$$s'--r
NXi
ll
'lE
ll s,+ll a ;
(\I
Idl
olu.tlclJIal>lttlol
fl
I
I
g
t!lol
pl u:
I
IurlorlF{l
'{l
I
I
ol
=.1olutl
1l
<l>l
I!|olzl
fl
C)
!.P
c)(U
ul
E
(\lt\(Y)
I\o<!Ol
I
II
FI-..l
ctl
ZI
HI
3l
t!lolzl
FI
PU'co(-)
P
!o
(u
UI(dT
:d
tl.
=
oUI.voG'-)
x
I(Y)('.,N
I
ufrtI{J
E
.lJ
tn
(l,(')
.q
6
.ULL
+,
(U
9-(l)+'
o(-)
c)(')
.E
r1i
=z
.D
-l
EoF
GF2o()
:*o
=+EOz
d.F
uJJ
uJ
2?cox>(rfFt- zo
C)
E-rO<FE()uJ<zFulFo6
o
ulF
(D6o-zoF:o-
uJY
uJo
oF
E
=GuJo-
lLlo+liel8Ilrolrlgurbkzo
z.r9
=e.oo
=zf:)dg
ifi(,o=
=r,3=u.l U6E=
F
G,ulo-t!
EE
E<tlf€frn9firb9cdlr-E ;tE FE; >o-i 8b!! EtuE XO-E ;'Eu{€=
UJ.DoF
E
=Elrlo-zIF()
E,Fazo(J
n!!
!!tr
ilbl tt)ujl!ttF
=Eulo-
an
UJFozo
=oJ
@
.6
ozzo
).i i
iiq-
strrl
'il I
s$i I\l#
tlJIJJu,:
ol!
oF,o
Fzoo
CE
UJz3o(Et!(u6z,'3
I lrjFI<Fz?,YZo<
IE;€Fl'iP(,rXio
I g5E;E
l€lcE:I F;i Es
lig;;;| 3'i=9Fl.s9iEPI E;= g;
!?i53O i O.N (J
;-€ 8E5
€;sP5
flilif
fEisS
EEi FgirHE*< G I::-a€E:
iiodE
eg;:i
E !aEe
tigiF
i$$EF
i
I
Io
0.
$1
0
d
t-\'\\(
8s
o
u
[\^\h
F
El!o.
zo':J
You,
c)z
J
(,rlj
l|J
z
@
=
2
olu
UJ
UJ
z
tr
lu
O'UJ
o
=]u>
z
6ll,t
Fttt
o-uJ
o-lz
uJJo
x
F
urv,
(tt!uJ
!=
=
o-
J
F
F
z
J
EFoul
qJ
z
dt
=
C)z
urE
NOuvn'lv^
ll
I
I
nJF :rol
=\Etl
E$
=>Ggi I
=pQ
6 .:6Es 9FP 6
9<5s9u- <(OAud>(JFo|.iri
ile
il=r
Irl
*[rl'
J\t\N-tN\
Jl<lFI
ZI
zl
>l
z
F
attz
z
I
F
z
F
(9
uJ
aF2
lril
l:ill:llt<tltztl
tsllotlotl
$
Ell!( tlqJ tl5tloll
^tl
-il
Etl tu
=I
o-
0ztr
(ooG
v,
=F
!r
u,
J
Itc.l
\rS
:l
f,\l
z
<r9ze .
cooz,z
dPt!tr
F
El!Gt!otu,'E(J
=zE.ctlooE 9..EPb0'= rE
=>t::{FE h=
co
I
I-l
5
tt\,\\J
\
\
u,
=z
-1
Ji
$l-$
dl s
Nr.\;'fl{ctu8.{< talJ 'jl
< )-lEdl /J:
-l
5l
3l
3
.l
C\
\\
ui
l!F
ot
;l
f,ttlol
3
FI
(,l
uJl
3>lr.lol
=lotFI
('l
HlJI
<l
BIzl3lg
ol
Fl EF(J
UJ
F.Fo
<F(r()l!<zEUJF(rzo
C)
J
C)
(tsFollJJ
sF
=Ed6o
oF
arFzo(.)
z
T()r!
=
J<c)a.nt-!,t ul-rO
o
si
;^\JZ oo
ri92==F<t_t t- ?ioi
dd=
ba'= rE
=o.=>TJF5 H=u J t'::r :aE EbqlF,..E igg ilF!r-Tttr
uJcto
1t*-
' e,)
0)
-o
vl
bl3l
( c*;tE\ \-.., t l-\ (.., / F-\<-/ l-'-E Epx
I )',)3
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
;a.- /' r ,:',r' 5 ' .Dg No*,
INSPECTION-Ey**9f
7tr,,,,, ;'l , t;-,',i.r
REQUEST
VAlL
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
LOCATION:
CALLER
TUES
l',t
WED
'/Z fu,,AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
vi rnnutruc
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr HEATING
tr SUPPLY AIR
T] DISAPPROVEO tr REINSPECTION REQUIFED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
m
// i 1-)ECTION
,-| ,,1 TOWN OF
.- \ (?-.1,\.,<:-1 ,4- .
t
NSPPERMIT NUMBEB OF PROJECT REQUEST
VAIL I
i
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
j j' .ioe NAME
INSPECTION:MON
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
ROOF & SHEEB
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr HEATING
tr CONDUIT
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,CORRECTIONS:
m
DATE INSPECTOR
/,7,,
PERMIT NUMBE INSPECTION
4,'' TOWN OF
, a_-21_.,
REOUESTVAIL }/ti-
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
NAME
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES WED
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
ROOF & SHE .,,, ,,6 GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
T] POOL / H. TUB
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
T] CONDUIT B SUPPLY AIB
APPROVED
GORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
ffi
lr7)-NSP ECTION REQUESTPERMIT NUMr NUMqER OF PROJ-rcTll,,l?\'
INSPECTION:
(-\ TO
\- ,?.-. + -
o)uV"**.
DATE
4 t,',, r.s /CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
UNDERGROUNO
ROUGH / D.W.V,
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
T] SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
\tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:[IECHANIGAL:
tr
tr
tr
o
TEMP. POWER tr
B
tr
tr
HEATING
ROUGH EXHAUST HOOOS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
r-r Fr NAI ,..-) n FINAI .-- /
tr APPROVED 4:dffipRovED EINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
| -t -'-'r ^tx /? o
PEFIMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
INSPECTION.i TOWN OF
/f7>
REQUEST
VAIL I
o
JOB NAME
MON
at
ICALLER
TUES WED THUR PM
LOCATION:h't A (Le.,t':/a ./t ..t/-. L
BUILDIT{G:ft
Kroortrucs / srEEL 4rtYrEtz'
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION O POOL/ H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL T] FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
IIEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
u
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr-
tr FINAL tr FINAL
VED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
GORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
m
{J
ae
coc)o
u.lF
al,dlo1zo
Fo-
IJJY
UIdt
oF
E
EuJ@o-@
1I- -:to-l> .il6=lO r'rl,zlrPlgtrbkz6
6I!tc
BI
J
2
T
uJ
=tr
EF
lljJ
Lu
rt{Lt4
z
J
!
tr
=CEtu
t!
:!{E2E<CLf,60neEP!ir
5gE dEE FEE =9-c 669 itnEX'Lt x>t q-
€=
uJlo
F
zo9ze
=zlf
o-- P
E
=E
lrJo-zIF().tg
6zop Dtn
o
=E
=EUJo-
-l - l*:H r:
EI , H Izl&il . A I')l < |l1I',I
co'o Icol€ |c'\' c'\
flt*;il#
-i- o tr lq6*E.e ld
rEffi+ Ir
EiEgEJE
:Ee g;
do'-!-5a9 (.1 E
gH:;:
sBiEI
=>rE
fut
=ao
ztr^
ato
=>a)2l!<a.) 0-
ioF9j$i
tl
lz lsi
l-lH
lalsg lF 1..
T IiIET IHIE-tto..F tz
= FHI;
B 9al8
= 381<- ctdt.EC)IHotc tH
fr",lE:Fl lf4
EH 13UJF Izol=yiz ltavH'z
3
=i
ul
ulo- l!>o
z
at,)
ozY(l
at
AX
iy.
ul
:l<li-l
zl
(9z
=l!
Jdl
FoJ
HtsH
H.t)
B
F]
FTarlrc)
FlFlH
i'i
=z
o-))
14
FE
FAt-l
T{&r
E
u.f
=4
.fF.f,|\\
X
anll,JEo
=
>tB
ulFf
z
CAg
L)
P
6
E
G
aa
IJJ
o
=
oHH
&ts(nz
HV)
FtN
E
tr
FA
Ic{F
z
ciul
G,
Ja
lroz;
FI
H&H
F1
FJ
=tr
I(h
.iz
oulI
l!oz3
F
o\
IFN@
=tr
cilz)
fl
1l
l!
zl
3lolH =tr
z
tti
tu.EJa
t!
z3
F
E
zri
uj
IIoz3
F
uiJ
u,lF
EuJz
=o
Fo
UJE
O
E
-tO<FG()uJ<zEUJFo6
()
.<o/ZF{) t-tFsJ 9F
=z-ru O
-O
tgP
;C)=<=E
d- =o
2
I
UJ
ts
5
,)
E.
l--E irul
IEo2<dqfr-7
lcrlo
l6rl<t-
lz
[8
toIGt<
qJITDHt=
6ta"ldl6l;
=
| ? | :l
=slfrlElHdt=tutH
igEdj
rI \ql
e'F
;agF-$
fur.S zl
.. >lct
orllu,zoE
llJ
J
z9F6
F
o
F
at
-rl<l
EI
=I
o-F
ts
=trul
_. o-__-
3' *l> tl* old l'lt =slgu,
2Ex
F
=Etuo-
z
J
I
I
I
I
IJJdl
I
I
IF
N
l{
f-)
l',jlrlut\
S-,
'ii I
=l<lzl
-9. I
$$/JJ:
l
0*
bn(\
to
luJuJF
!J#l
{ fl-ll3
El Bl Hll du-r Fl Fll E
?l
8l
3olg
otH
'll
lfllrld
I
dflEl
I
I
I
I
I
gl
,I
trJl:l
<l>lIrlolzt .,i]t fOI IJJFI F
I
E
.J
sEl
UJz
=o
FouJ
tsqF
()
<oOFFOi<
sEU
E
-.r O<F0.oTIJ <zE
t,1 zoc)
:F;c)
=_E:z
C)
*6YF>()3t
Y,Z
=g
5lF gl,5 zli
8l:><x <*x
!Dn
zoP
=<coOEZ
.8
."*d
=E=;Hg
iirs=<.8u,91 4'
Y5
EEgF^.?
556:l.r q
-F cc
.: rrJ ;:-c
=2>F -r- J t-E= t' =ooaul;;39 R: .o |!
F j9 0
=H -i t!5rr6 $E!!E Fg<f,- r.,l I
=u,-oip*F**
-EI
zol-o:)EF@zoo
trq!
\
a
SPE CTIONTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAILPERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
' i - --)"
DATE -. '.-- JOB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
IN
CALLER
TUES WED AM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr BOUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
F APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIBED
DATE INSPECTOR
C)r-
(.c(:
z
z
.u =>_i@o>z
o-- P
..i5\J\J=
=Et<Qf-r
"'! -: uJ6il>
c0,
oq,
o
lFE=
o;oi
otL
'Dx-tr>-fF
oz
FouJ-)oE.L
J@ll
- =fl<\trl.+l
I
I
uJ
Eo
ts
=E,lrlo-zIFo:)
E,Fazo()
F<tLttl
auJF
z
z
to
I
==o
=z
vN
I
ili+z
r-zil_<?"!
<- :- ?.i
< :'1 ,^ ^:i:;;i-x^'J!,.ai<iz:<czc
=27-=)>.?<i=v t- - 34
- irt:ii5!: ?:<e <
liu,<tro> *!,<a-ta!c =<q<:,.:
q
rs
DO
co
auJ
UJt!t
=Elu tn
LUIIJu{
F
=tttJ
J
F
oG
lo
=g
tlt
z
-r/,uJo
o-lrJ
(L
z
LIJ
(J
=EL!
zo
=l
2
I
lu
=
NOIIVNIVA
IlJ
o-
F
F
dz
llJ
=
F
z
uJ
zo
F
z
g
o-uJE 2Z
<EA66 fiEaP,f ;qEs i96tt,uJ<Ozdoz)
az>aa=irHS3=dpEiEH
=9u-;OUJOOoIz<)
=
csl(r) |r-'l(f, I
E
zfz
Eo
=
Fz
z)t!3
G
+r
o
uo!
I
*FX.F;Fz z Lr,
tr ^ 6 z-X:>YlF I o f,-6 -a tr:
= > 9.;x Y ii +J: a 6'r6 d ...r!; r :!4 S? b.!ixz
<NO
,<w
I
@
\a:
=
z
tr
zo
=oo
z9F
ElrJ
ujz:<9
F
-)Eiu_x=o
JF-
UJ
$
oz
ts
=uJo-
HI
?l=l
>l
Io-
trI
oo
tltltllltltllll-l| (/tlI LUIl6l
t<l>l JlEl <ltr--l =l
ulEoo
a
=
lrtlctlol I.'-l IPt Iot I
!t I+tl Iel Iol Ic)l Itl
€|ot IAl utl-ot tltl.el =l-l altclt<lEl dlit E
.Ft
!€
+,,na,IJ
Lc,.pEo(J
(u
OrC'
u;
z
I
I
t_lo
I
IutluJl
6lol<l
<!
=o E
eir
uJ
FOz
E
F
Fz
z
'!_
O
LU
(JoZ. t-
;#:]F-JZO- /.\
<oC)Ftr?
;F
=z
UJE_ro
c
<F
L!<ZE,tr-J F a
I
trtrltr
z
I
(r
t.lJ
,1
ta
C
F
(-
(l
0
t\
J
o
J
I ryaUJ
uJLLt
=
LU
tlIJ
tIih\
iln
gN
\
N\)
rI
\
\
\
\
-a
j=_)-:'.:'1<:Z-". 1-i-<i-r:-
FIr. 7:
: ^ .: Y .,\;. il:.a?.)
=?.2;)i.?"Iit F i- 34
< n 1rl z::l!rl
a<)ISriii:r,, <dc> *',<c itxtI?a:<t-.1
u
\
U"
\,
il
b
ryol
\
a.)E
lI.
$,.
N
\
a
\
t
s
ol
0
\
b
tr(ular
zoJ
la:
Y
()
o-
a|-
(lz(n
:
a-
9z
I
L!
uJf
9
E(J
r
ou
o@J!!
z
6
111o
tr
UJ
(L
li
UJ
o
U'
LUut
L
tl,lc-
.J
F
F
::
fm
aFOIJJ
UI
z
(!5:)
.-t
2
:
NOuVntvA
"l
1
Il
4
1t(
-z.|
YGo
=ZZtL
F-^62X:r >Ytr I of,
<Jr a axz>-()o()9?.(JzXr.L <oq i9J iI E:H Y
t r./6(\(J
J
1,.4t-
IJ
I
9l-
a
(!
tlJ
\\
S
V).I
ctao.t1']E
t||tltrlttl7 z. zP fia F6-ET'pR9=#;qE383Esa33nEoY<coe.6z)illlllttrtll
;Tq E $x:nP +HE*;8955nC,(Jrz<)
z
tr
.J:)az
llJ)t-'l'l
$
F
r
\
a
J
o
=
4.
ul
(L
F
Io
2
rt
3
z
o
x)
z
Eoo
zotr
ti.lF
;
ulzY9
t-.V
fl
b
T
l1\
ll.j
t-
E
o
:)o)t-=
UJ
$
N
=
eJ
.J
cqq
'_lI
I
F
(r
LIJ
u.J
F
z
uJ
o-
l- t5E I:u l-ltJ
o-z
\_bNil"i ><-zo()
/(}.| . 1if-_\'. ,'/lsv4_r=:igel
UJF
o
| :-rIJIl'-lt',1
$ilI'J{ ?l
dr ..- |
l5ll-v.it'-l(Jtz
l,\J
JLL
'L)9,'+tt
5W
+0
L!
:-j
,.
--)
ri'j
zoI
,l;lil
-!l
_sl'-l.I
-il
fl
't4
s.f
=l
1
q
x
Rgj
oo
d
'l40
f\
Coi\r CL
1
9
c
;E
iq
q
t{')
=g
/-
t
o
([l
e.oo
lo
A,
')o
=()
+a
J
\-/
q
--9
_-9
+
E
iv
x
2
rq
oo
q
7
10
J
I
1
cq
=!L
I
I
I,l,J
il:
lc
.:
\u
l9
J
=E
au"tlrJEoo
:
t4
f-
i4at.q
o-{
vl
)
)t
ts
-lf,!-44
4
>J
1
a
.)
6
E
ur
o
J?
;>
F
)o
)
-:4
c
.a
-
il
-sj
I{
r.:.
f
)
)
=E
t
I(
I
I
lf{
lot:t<t=
,t
qor-j0-
L
43
i n
uJE
?
t
=o
GUJz3
7
F
C)LI'bT
<F(r(JLu<ZE
LJ.r F(rzo
<o(JF
=<)-<
LIJ ;do
OOzl
=#3FJZ(lO
c)
< l-ro;
7()
=#-Fiz
=g
E.x
r11/b2
J<()o?.:o
z
z
F
c
oli-
c,z.a
=
)."i5zEe
dd=
[Jntr
E
t
E
t)
o
iu
E
d,
(l,T'DNL]
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
W
DtrPNRTFIIJNT OF CO}II,ITY DIJVtrLOI)MDNT/JII\' RUBIN
ro/e/Bo
Revised Villarge CenLer proposal_
The revised VillaqeThe first floor i!space. ?he second
CenteL Proposal i,sidentical-, showinq
very similar to2,900 square feet first Proposal .cornmereialosal shows
theofproan 850 square feet a
o Les StreEEE
fl.oor is what has changed. The new
secon oo: also has 200 gare feet which t-to be addeden
to the East of the new additionh/hat r.ras presented in the First ProposaI.
area which deter:mined.leave enough rcom for
s.a
that the prcSrosed
t-he bus lane and
e new addition will remove. The plazaremains in a similar configuration to
A survey has been done of thelocation of the building cloesa walkway
DEPARTI"IE]N T REC OI.O,IENDAT TON
The Departnent of-cominunity Development ::ecornnrends approval cf the revisedplran with the following "oi,titio"s,
'e
That a 20 }'ear restriction be placed on the eso "qrore foot apartment.
2- That the applicant is respon"i!}u.fcr arr- improvements in the prazato the East. of the pro;..osld add.itj.on.
That the applicant dedicafe the necessary land for the bus lane and,walkway.
1.
5.
That the applicant agree to participate.in and nota special inprovement distrilt, if. ina wfr"r, i"r"i.a
That- the appJ.icant agree to work with the Tovrn inof the walkway along Village Center Buil<iing D andimprovenents thar- clirectly benefit his conrm6rcial
remonstrate againstfor Vail Village.
ihe redevelopmentpay for those
sPace.
We feel that the revised plan is in basicUrban Design Guj_de plan and VaiI Lionshead
conformance with the Vail VillageUrban Design Considerations.
MINUTES OF PI,ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMI,ISSION MEETING
Monday, October 13, 1980 3:00 P.l,l.
II{EMBERS PRESENT COI,,NCIL }4EII{BER
Gerry White
John Perkins
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Gaynor Mill-er,fj:n Morgan
3.Addition to Villa Center Buildinq D requirin both a Densi Controlarlanceand an Exte or fication ro Rev Proposa
t
Bill Wilto
STAFF PRESENT
Dick Ryan
.Iim RubinPeter PattenBetsy Rosolack
a
The rheetilg was cal-led to order by Gerry v{trite. Dan Corcoran moved theminutes of the sept I meeting be lpprovEd., seconded by na oiigei.5-0 i.n favor (.tlm Morgan and Gaynor Mirrer hadnrt arrLved yeti.
2. Miskell qree ,fficR-GTiance requesr.
l"t9l Patten presented the staffrs feelings as written in the memo rnailedto the Corunission, reconmend.ing denial . titritney Miskell distributed moreinformation incl-uding a retter from tle neighboi to the easi ippiovingthe greenhouse. Din corcoran felt it wouia l- a positive adlition to1 v|ry pJ-ain East side of the house. John/Perkins iaid he was the originald,esigner, and al_though he wour-d abstain trprn -rre vote, agreed with Dan.Roger T. moved that the variance be approrrled, Dan seconded it. The .voteril3s 1in favor, l(Gerry) against. cfr6;Eitained, since he did not hearthe discussion.
Jim Rfbin said a :y.rv9r had been- completed to see if the proposalwould interfere with the bus lane, and explainea tne diffireiJes-in tnisproposal . He pointed out the 5 condition-s listed in the memo thai thestaff hranted to see implemented if approval was granted. He felt thatthe plan was in basic lonformance witir the vaii iiii"g"'urli"-o.sign GuidePlan and Vail Lionshead urban Design ConsiderJtions,. The 2 smaller unitsthat_were regested by the staff in the "ii;G;i-froposar were discussed.Cecil Dodson, president of_viJ-lage Center Condorniniurnn Association, BldgslrB a c guestioned approval of tiice the square iootage as proposed in -
I* uTf*" D:"1?t.cuide Plan. Dick Ryan t"fti"a itrat ine urban-Design Guiderran qlct not dictate exact plans, but was a guide only. t{r. Dodson protestedlhg two stories, but stated that he approved the improvement of the area.rfohn Perkins felt that the massing heiied to make the transition from onesl?.r{ to- the present two story buildin;. I"tr. Dodson asked. if it was workedwithin the urban.Design Guide plan. Gerry white repried that the uDGpprovided-the guide. Dick added. that ileff winston hid reviewed this proposalpresented the first time, but not the 2nd one. ,John p. questioned theIandscaping of the area i.o the east, and if the owners would work with ,Ieffof,\ that. Fred Hibberd repried he wourd,, adding that the tst plan had thesame footprint, then he tiiea to please'others-by changing thl elevations.rn doing so' one owner had to exchange his view ior attditionar space.
o
It.i
pec-2-L0lL5l80
Fred Hibberdrs statements on the 5 conditions vtere!
L. he wasnrt looking for a condo to market2. herd like to continue to to work further with Jeff Winston
3. the bus lane does encroach onto his proPerty, but it and the walkway
work well and-he will dedicate the necessary fand4. agrees wi-cir ch5. agrees with this
Ed Drager didn't agree with having a second story, since a I story was
shown in the UDGP. .Iohn Perkins stated that the design cannot be setat the scale of 1"=200 r, nor square footage specified. Gaynor Miller feltthat in working with Fred for L-L/2 nonths, that this was a much better
design and that it would blend in very well , adding that the Town needs
busei and walks and a compromise should be made. Roger T. added that the].ocationwasveryviFiureaffiissionhadvisitedthesite that they h-d agreed that a one story building didnrt look rightat that l-ocation. Gerry agreed and stated that he felt it was in keepingwith the UDGP.
Roger moved for approval subject to the 5 conditions in the memo, ilohn
seconded. Vote was 4 in favor, 2 agaLnst. (Dan c Ed against) . ,Ifin abstaine
since he didnrt hear the ful-l discussion.
4. A Conditonal Use Request for the Cove-red,Bfidge.Store !o-alIow the
ilim Rubin surmned up the memo, stating that the staff was in favor ofapproval, for the leasons stited in Ehe memorandum. Ed Drager asked how
one could say that there is no way one can keep people living in the
core area--dlid that mean no one wanted to live there? He felt it was
inconsistent with the prior case where the staff is insisting that an aPartgo in to make something look better because people will want to live there.
.Iim Rubin felt that the apartments were in two different locations.
This one is right across from 2 night clubs with more corunotion at thislocation.
John Dobson stated that Bridge Street is a heavily traveled area in Vail
Uses of this type have been granted. In the early days' it made sense,but doesnrt now to any where near the degree. Gorsuch, the Bank building'etc. have done the same thing. There are perhaps two.Iong term spacesin the core, and precedent has been established. L,ong term has not
worked out. Dan Corcoran .then added ' that the Town is being
sued by a property owner who considered just the opposite, that his proPer-ty was quite valuable, namely the tower over the Rucksack. They certainly
wouldnrt want that conversion. He stated that he was on the Planning
Conuirission when the conversion came through with the apartments that
used to be above the Liquor Store and he opposed that.
John Dobson asked ifconditionaluses were granted to the Ore House Building'
the Cyrano buildingr or for Gorsush. He repeated that the precedent
had been established and that long terrn housing simpJ.y does not t^tork
out in that area as it once did. He read the purpose of the CCI zonedistrict.
,fim Rubin reiterated one,.statement thet John D had made, that there
are no controls that would reguire those units to be long term. Johncould rent them out short term.
?
(
?ROPOSAI,
The Virrage cenrer is -located in a -c"S"::+?1 core rr Distri"tiri.""a
ift .i,tl3"$:-i'i:;*!ti.lEF*":*{i''",,:;#"i?ui:ai.1s#;;i="-
I ;;;";;":', . ii.:':i-l:ub;*t Xi :l .
u "' ase ur b an
and'will be revr
rhe proposar is for a.11909 square foot-bui1u::?.1:E"iiidi:if"
"-i:i:6 .lI ;3: =w;k;litiri "?.r":"BT,B'o
lli";;' ;;Ei br sround
revel conmercr-ar space and a ""tiii ;;";i-t,too ;a;";t foot rnanager's
apartment, -rrre Drocesses: pensltY
""",11
i "un":::: : :"il:l i*?i:I ii'ff :l'Hi!l :-i: - ffi : T:::'ff ' 3H ;: : i uu i i" n' "
is needed ror ti.-ilroo =e. r.-"-ii-s!iis-unitl."i"It--irtivillage center-
is currentry i,,.!*cess of-both itS,iii; and its ;;;";; footage standaros.
InlookingatthepasthistoryoftheVillagecenterBuilding'
*::r";q=i;ii,:iti:iHi*";ii#fr ;#t$;il*1=q#'11:"."';;;;;ffise for a landscan: Ptl
:il:*lf ijr-ilit;tliul!:I:1:":Tit'1i3"'i:;.-te-ni !" In? n"*
cbuncir for a nesolution arnenaii;"ii!";i;tio" llo'*ii'-i"ii"" of L974'
STATISTICS
Total Land Area =
Total No- of Units
Total No. of Units
GRFA AIIowed:
65,299 sq ft
E6zcr.orrcryl
37 units
62 units
l
I
'
j
liitltiti
l1
Allowecl:
Existing:
2,239 sq fl
GRFA Existins: :yt -
Conunercial Building D: 5't60 sg f,t
--a-- ..'--t.
-./ ,,' r' '- t' - :2 - ."-"'- -.'-<,.,",-/^-
vail, colorado 81657
May 12, 1981
Vai'l Core Condo Assn.
Vi'llage Center Corrnercial Bldg.Village Center BIdg. D.
Re : Fire Alarm System
Dear Sirs' I
It has come to ry attention that a problem exist with the existingfire alarm system in the corrnercia'l and residential sectjons of Village
Center Build'ing D. The problem appears to be due to inadaquate mai:n-tainence of the standpipe and sprinkler system. A'l ow air alarm onthe dry pipe system continues to activate on apx. eight hour intervals.This constitutes a prob'lem for both you and us, in that the low airalarm causes a signal to be transmitted to the Central Recieving Station
thus requiring the dispatcher to get up from th'ier station and reset thennin fire alarm pane'l every time the low air alarm is activated. Theair compressor for the system cannot keep up with the initial loss ofa'!r i1 the system sufficent'ly to prohibit multiple alarms being trans-mitted within a very few minutesSecondly, the frequent activating of the low a'i r alarm indicates apotential exist for unnecessary discharging of the sprinkler and stand-pipe systems, rot to mention the excess-weir and teai on the fire alarmpanel .
The other matter I wish to discuss is the impact of the constructionof_the new building, Village Center E. Certian aspects of the builingwill and do affect Village Center D.All new construction'in the Village Core, Lionshead and the hlest VailConmercial sector, is required to hive an approved fire alarm systeminstal'led at the time of construction. Hence, the new building-willhave a fire alarm system. One of the primary aspects of the fire a'l armsystem to be installed in the new building will be the installationof smoke and heat detectors.' The stairway at the East end of the existing building wil1 be inter-grated into the design of the new building. A smoke detector will berequired to be installed at the top of the staircase. Due to the closeproximity of the two buildings and the inadaquacy of the fire alarm in theexisting building, the Vail Fire Department requires the.insta'llation of
303-476-7000luwnbox 100
box 100 vail, colorado 81657
Vi'l 'lage Center Buj1di ngs D & E
303-476-7000
Page 2
system smoke detectors to be incorporated into the fire alarm system.-The majn advantage of installing'system smoke detectors at this time
is three fold;
1. The present fire alarm system is not adaquate for life.safety of
the bccupants in the event a fire starts in an unoccupied unit.
A fire wbuld gain considerable headway prior to detection with';'i the single station detectQrs you have installed in the lofts' l,{ith
the open attic in'it's present condjtion' even the unit detectors
could'be destroyed prior to annunciat'ing the presence of smoke,
as evjdenced by the Beaver Bench Fire that occured here in the
area a couple of years ago.
2. The Board of Directors of the Vail Fire Protection District is
moving toward the adoption of fire code amendments that would
requ.iie the updat.ing of a1 I fire alarm systents withjn the District,
regjardless of'the "-grandfather clause ". The adoption of these
coies may occur someiime this summer and.at the latest, th1 s fall.
3. By working in conjunction with the nel construction' the cost of
installing apx. four smoke detectors and two pull stations could
be'included in the contract to install the new fjrealarm system'
thus reducing the final cost to be incured with the'installation
of the additional detectors.
I wou1 d apprec'iate your serious consideration on this matter, fggplnS,in mind that'there exist a strong possib'i1ity that the changes will be
required before the end of the summer and will in fact be required by
next fall.I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. You may contact
rne here at the Vail Fire Department.
Sincerely,
'/...2:1* ' i1-"2r;z i-1,.---..
Michael McGee
Fi re Marshal IVail Fire Debartment
1981 CONSTRUCTTON SCHEDLLE FOR
VTILAGE CENTER EAST
Aprtl 27 - Construct fe.nce plus temporary power
Aprll 28 - Lumber delivery
May 4 - Start flret floor framlng
May 29 - Flrst floor framlng complete. Request lnspection.
June I - Start plurnblng, nechanlcal , electrical rough inflrst floor
June 19 - Seeond floor framing, roof franing complete, requestlnspectlon
June 19 - Start plywood roof deck
July I - Plywood roof deck complete
July 5 - Start roof eontractor
July 1l - Complete roof
July 20 - Complete electrlcal-, mechanical , plumblng rough irlrequest lnspection
August 3 - Start exterlor sidlng
AugustT - Startstucco
August 2L - Complete exterlor siding and stucco.
August 21 - Start interior sheet rock
Septernber 8 - Complete interlor sheet rock
September 8 - Start palntlng
September 15 - Tenant flnlshes start
September 20 - Conplete palnting
'0ctober 5 - Conplete plumbing, electrlcat and mechanlcal
0etober 15 - Complete punch llst, request inspectlon
October 26 - Request flnal inspection - Certificate of occupancy.
:
March 12, 1981
3. InEerior non-bearins DartiEions will be composed of metal
studs and recei.t. oil.'layer of 5/8" Type "Xi' gyPsum board
on each side.
4.Wood studs will be used in construction of bay windows and
other areas that metal studs are not reasonable. The in-
side surface will receive one layer of 5/8" Type "X" gyp-
srlrn board. The exterior surface will receLve L/2" plywood
and stucco.
5.
6.
New beams
The new roof and floor construction will belumber. The urtderside of these wood joists
two layers of 576'' T;rpe "X" gypsum board.of the floor joists will receive treatment
one hour construction requirements.
New beams will be glu-lau beams
dimens ion.
of at least 5-118" x L2"
dimensionedwill receiveThe top surfaceto cornply with
7 . Access will be provided to all voids.
l:
TT.TSTCTION REQUEST
TOWN.OF VA|L
"/'
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON . TUES WED THUR , "FRl ----. A[4
tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
triFOOTINGS i STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING N ROUGH / WATER
O INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
O SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWEB
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
E]tr
tr FINAL D FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
t I
PE
lr l'
INS
-4*
CTIONTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
NAM-EDATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB
INSPECTION: MON
CALLER
ruES . rHUR FHI
BI
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
U ILDING:PLUMBING:
E UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
T] TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
D CONDUIT C SUPPLY AIR
D
tr FINAT O FINAL
-R APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED REINSPECTION REOUIRED
Best
copy
Available
DATE INSPECTOR
DATE JOB NAME V, I
cnoN Reouesr
T,*
AIL) al-,,trl--t- ' ,/.L /? ey't-t -z
READY FoR INSPECTION: .66il
LocAroN: ClnA -)--
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI PM
INS
'l TOWN OF V
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FBAMING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
ELE
tr1
{r
trc
tr_
crirclr:MECHANICAL:
TEMP, POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL r] FINAI
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
,*#"toN REeuEsr
,. TOW
// //
OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION: MON WED THUR
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL \ noucx / D.w.v.
\ noucr / wArERtr FBAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
E FINAL tr FINAL
f aeenoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
ome 7-z g'- f/ rNsPEcroR
t rrusilctoN REeuEsr
JOB NAME
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
F
WED THUR FRI PM
t*4uO
BUILDING:
C] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H, TUB
ELE
trT
trF
DC
tr_
tr HEATINGTEMP. POWER
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL
AppnoveoCORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
q-L
INSPECTOR
,*#"toN REeuEsrTOWN OF VAIL
olle f,- 4- 5r / JoB NAME
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
{€G#trerF.
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION i STEEL
D FRAMING ". trROUGH/WATER
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
EI SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
I] CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
q FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
//-INSPECTOR
ISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE tr. q- f/ JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
L€EAT?OI\tr:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL E FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED N REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIO
DAIE f- 6 .7/ rNSPEcroR
,*#"toN
,,1/
f i'rt
TOWN OF; ,7//
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES r:\WED THUR 1 FRI'.,
\_,;
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FRAMING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr
Xtr
POOL / H. TU R
!,.
FINAL FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
B ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
o
tr
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DISAPPROVED I/ RErNSPEcrroN REeu rBED/\ -
e-
INSPECTOR
,"#"toN REeuEsr
TO OF VAIL
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr BOUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION O GAS PIPING
SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
E HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
x DTSAPPROVED E REINSPECTION REOUIRED
/L /4/ t _
DATE INSPECTOR
IN
I
SPE
JOB NAME
l'nitL.
CTIONTOWN OF
Vr
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
(t -r,w"'*^ .
CALLEB
TUES WED THUR
,e
FRI -----@PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
INSULATION EI GAS PIPING
tr SHEETBOCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
D CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,l ,*#"toNTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL'l / /,,1\?--7, y'- ?DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
MON TUES
BUILDING:
i] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE_
tr FRAMING
firr.rsur-nrror.r tr GAS PIPING
tr EEETROCKo\-
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
o
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
O FINAL tr FINAT
tr DISAPPROVED D REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTOR
REQUEST
VAIL
JOB NAME
I .r.i
/l(c-trr ra
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI
e./
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
n
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
(nouoH O EXHAUST HOODS
N CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
-t tA PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED N REINSPECTION REQUIREDt-.
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
CTIONTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
JOB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
TION:
CALLER
TUES
-Ji , ',
THUR FRI AM (9
BUILDING:
B FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL -tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
{ rorn"tr EXHAUST HOODS
N CONDUIT
trl
tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr F{NAL D FINAL
APPROVED
)BRECTIONS:
f' E DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
,*rt"toN, TOWN OFfr't,t'l/
REQUEST
VAIL,r //tt,( i!,DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
{,n" F't ,'.
FRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
O INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
n
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
n
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
D CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
n{ .-v-?.t; r t- , ,"trd)n-O FINAL O FINAL
APPBOVED O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
ll ..'l 1 |oor. /a -/ /- fr/ rNSpEcroR
*INSPE//
,*, //fr,//t JoB NAME
aPt
CTION REQUESTOF VAIL
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
THUR
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL O UNDERGROUND
-
O FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER O HEATING
tr BOUGH tr
tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
fI CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
/ Z 7t--'--', n.,u n
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr BEINSPECTION REQUIBED
oor,- // - Zd- rf r TNSPECT.R
rru#ctoNTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
s71E //- "f il JoB NAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PMFRIINSPECTION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
O INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL O POOL / H. TUB
tr
o FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANlCAL:
tr HEATING
tr
n
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
E FINAL
o
tr FINAL
KPPnoveo
COF}REEFIENS:
B DISAPPROVED PECTION REQUIRED
oot, //' q 2' { rNSPEcroR
**
INSPE CTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR @ PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V,
O ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
D SHEETROCK NAIL T] POOL / H. TUB
D FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER O HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT D SUPPLY AIR
FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIREDAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
tINSPECTION REQUEST: TOWN OF VAIL
/l't
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEE-
O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr
n
tr
tr
FRAMING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
X*,*t tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
n
tr FWK-O FINAL
PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
/2 ,1 /DA-:E /l- , /*,.:/ TNSPECTOR
tINSPECTION REQUEST;
DATE
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:THUR FRI ---ATI.-PM*'
BTIILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr HOUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEE_
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr GAS PIPING
O POOL / H. TUB
FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUE HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
D FINAL
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTIOT{I REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
INSPECTOR
rINSPECTIONTOWN OF
t.
/..: " t-it'l
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION:MON TUES WEO ) THUR FRI AM PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
n
tr GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
n
tr FINAL B FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
N TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
n
n
HEATING
D
tr
n
ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
6. rrrunl O FINAL
l/tppaoveo D DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
TPoRRECrloNS:
/,t1't'z'-
. -.)
DATE INSPECTOR
PERMIT
.:r-.
INSPECTIONTOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
D^rE f)2.4 l.lq4t JoB NAME \Au-'-- '-'=/ .' re+- a/tz<( A,-rl^afo--)
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR
CORRECTIONS:
NUMBER OF PROJECT
BUILDING:
D FOOTINGS / STEEL
PL
tr
tr
tr
tr
o
o
UMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
O INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
D D
tr#'*ot FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH D
tr
o
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
PPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
L--a,--k7-L >?rJ/6l
DATE INSPECTOR
FIL T COPY
75 toulh ftonttgp rcld
Y.ll, color.do 81657
(38) 47$2138
(303) {7$2139
ofrce of communlty develoPmenl
October 7, 1991
Mr. Fred Hibberd, Jr.
P.O. Box7474
Jackson Hole, WY 83001
Fle: Lot K, Block 5E, Vall Valley Flrst Flllng
1Zl East Meadow Drlve, Vlllage Center Eest
Dear Mr. Hibberd:
tn reviewing old building permit files, and attempting to close them out, staff discovered that
the above-r:eferencsd residence never recelved a ftnal Certilicate of Ocanpancy, receivlng only
a Temporary Certilicate ol Occupancy (TCO). Slnce no landscapa inspection requesl was
ever made, ihe Town could not ieteaie a final Certiftcate of Occupancy. Due to the extonded
period of time from when the TCO was odginally issued, the staff belleves lt is now
ieasonable to issue a final Certificate of Ocalpancy for the residence.
stafl would like to let you know that any future propefty improvements will require rsview ol
the existing landscapiirg, and additional improvemenb may be requlred as a condition of
approval.
lf you have any questions, please do not hesitiate to call either Mary Dewing or Betsy
Rosolack at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
V4aftd,tt'1
Mary Dewing
Planning Intern
lab
ervl}tl+'
ar|0FI HIF(5I -i3: F t-1
=r gtv r- :-.arp Fn,EE .o
trll{1
AEFl|1
-Hr1gr+
-|.1lP\-
sA
=89€ F{l
.dlnHa.+ ElEA.g -o:t Frt+
***=*x-i-H:+o3>=F
^oZ--tX F '.1 .r1
\J=-l,:i';5i;
XAr -zi;ig-(.'r-{c+E
a!.:l- -'.1 , ,=
rt'"S=-'1 ,'. -9c2< -l: -lZ;*iF=O-r\.\>*l->+
=dS>F:-
-J-.,t ! :rlzro
lJb\or.nF.--if.r-=xt>;- \- lnYQZZ:J
''F^
^ ft: !,)l .-izt=v? (.'! --:l.:.:32cdo3:a-n
a1 ?!JFS<
llo<zc
V !J F
;<>*--xHro
.:\J
z
FFiP
oF'zHF'
H
F
H
z
c
o
Fc!'ttHUFIzHHPr
c.
F
H
F
a!
I
I
Itrll
lN)
F
.i,
=.
0o
=
:z
Ilorl\l
l-
I
I
I
I
I-t
g
o
2
3.-
IF
I
1-
oE
i
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
L
e
EI
FIt,
H
It
Lr
m
o-
N'N)
u2H
E
Dt
{
H
r..
UF
F
vr
Ir{
HF
r
tn
U)€
EJH
F
\o\o
3-;1=! i;
" =21 :7, :
=. = '^ I a =
"=i=i!- : = == ^r;il i i
1 =| =., ===_\l=,-,,ai li o-...<= 1?.i ==-'_=i?zi ; ii r:
=47.'^=T::; r: ez,= = a a.!_ = = = =.i7 i':?i L
=: iiai? r. = z.+E7aa';=: ir-i3 i
_ r;-1. !=., = a a .
)
)
H
o-l
2
>
zv,
o
t,
T>om
o(J st
f ic;\UE ::,::
<a:-to ;?;:
sili i!fr
ac=$09-s3\Ft; i. )-- < -- : z
NOrrvn'lv^
z2f;e Fi 5 :'', ?,
' }EH3EFanAd:ccoz)
tltl> llO' - ll:;;ll Iftr,tAll:9Oll- - .:+tly9cr.6logli=lz Z !- .t'loooPltr^6zurlo *. = ool? -e a E'l6; s€l<) z ^- OlF5 ;EI:B HI;<ri 6l
dtrlcl'l
I
oz
E
=0au.lo-
J
(Jz
T
LIJ
Jolr)l
5l
;l
a
q
=u-
6
F
J
.E|
(UE
(Uq-
|U(.)
tU
=z
--t
-=:r,=gEEEn4-EL
UJ
=z
!rg!ooE(uF
o
Erd
o
ll,le.oo
o.
F =
ul
F
E
=g
llJ
o
)a
=
uj
olI
<l
=l
=
tug.
o)
=
url
8lol
1l
<I
=l
I
tr
TJJq.oo
a:
ulz3
F
u,ET
<F(rc)r!<zEI.II F(tzoc)
<o
-<7EYF--z
L,
E
zt-
>d
JZ
O
<;YFz<)<s
P,2
=g
&.
E ;'\g
i-b2J<o0y,!H
co
Eo
-9o
!t
'E
5
E
Eo(,
f,.o
I-J +r
a!O-Ei=t
-ct-=€
oz
Fo
UJ-toEo-
J@lJIc')ldII€l
I
!UF
o
ts
=EltJo-zoF(Jf
E,FQzoo
I
Sfrn
Jz
z
=<(Do
=2.
rLrl
J
=al,'\ F
llor!
E
=r.lJ
u-
IJJIL
F
\r
EE
DATE i _t:
l -....
INSPECTION REQUEST.,.
TOWN OF VAIL
(.,/ .:) (t'- 'r i.: (.
JOB.NAME
CALLER
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON TUES -J WED THUR PMFRI
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND 'O UNDERGROUND '
B ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL / H. TUB
t-t
O FINAL
MECHANICALI
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
-
tr
tr FINAL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
ROUGH
tr
tr
tr
CONDUIT
FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
)aiFer lrseecroN REour RED
'2.t t/'. ,/,/ f .?1 .a: ./
./ *- ,' t' .../t t: (-/DATE
-1
INSPECTOH
:l
:tt!,
oz
-l
6
'(:
CC[,
.J,I'
t,.)
rlll
()
a)
(l:t-
()(.;
rl'tl
:,!
ci
t1
ii
;i,
ll:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1?l-.i
5
:1
(,
I
()
:r
n'iJdi;dl,lr
illll-d;dd['F
l'tt,It.
:t
t::
(r.
l_:
:;(l:
\ll
(-\ *y_.f
-f:c)
-- trr .i:-99
zr,
t t,
-lC)
:t:ca
...
;a Z rt-oo(Jfro.'il:( l >, ':::-! o cl l'
'nOtiz '- (.)o () '.2
u. .((\ (L
ii' ,i lt:.;.i () :j
F():'..-. cr (j
(i
r)
Ertsq,
.::
:J t,.a: ..
a: t() ;;,rr ::'
r) ,,
al.
't,
ttt)-.
o
ii is :\()aX-tt- ;tr. x
r.l
;i::
l.rJ
l)-
Z!;!.--(.)
:)'rL
(n
-7
r_)U
>
t'-"
.)j
t:
o.:)
CI
,-
i
:, ,' ). '',i,il,;i-- r. t i ;
- < I 'r '.-\,,_';.,o:
:.,;1 7.r;';- ':
!, l' !r \r <
r, r. < !r Ic n g Y.s.<-.<.':: <or.;
..:/. 1=-t 9 < :::\ l. F a .9<u. au.r::
>-f=i:
5'-t::(u '- o t. t- <w
:: - J!_1...r{..
<o.-,;. {.I u'|-: jo a : _,.
.l '-l
I
I
,,;
,",
aii.
-Jlr:: I(l: I)- |-2 1
zl:i I
:-l,l
t-{tt-lnltl
ll.t
{i
$'l\
,i{\.j
$$
Iilll;l ilhil i, i,, I
'li N' l/il I il tril r lsl
ii rl lr{.*it ii I;lil iisji \ l;i- l-:l--iii il-- -lh- l".l- l---:-::-::--_-::::::i:'- _ _ -I llJ l lil
i ; u | ['l{: F= ii,,F llrlfrNi2 lfiillNli loi.liiiill:i"-..i .t: c: :: IIu:;<);ll
O .r., O (i | |0.uiTL)1._,J...
il I I l l
[11-t r[l I
$J${ /Nlli/jli
Hil
r* Ehkl
'k/ilillwH'?
{il flil{q lllHi
,
? iN[ilJ il ffii F.>:
,t i:
itil
IJ
l1 trlfi\l
ii li
iblIl;l
t;
,.1:
_.t
-a.
s)t.
()...
:)()
.t t,
(-(\
'( 1.1-l ()
Icel.')l
=l-.1
'gJ I
I
I
I
I
ciz
E
=!U
oz
ouJ")o
olcoltl
3lrl:ll
I
uiF
o
o
oqt
o
!FE=
=tYoi
otL!oo;E>-fF
zIF()
D
E,Fozo
C)
ts
=E,lrlo-
Jz
z
za
coo>z
."i5
=83dd=
L]LItr
azfi;=cz<(, (LEqP,
diuJEF06
<oz@z)
:<(r
=ZZtL
i o- az^X: :YF9 0f,
aog.z>-o
(JzX
LL<o1 iIJJ ;:
;(Jg
iN(J
a
!
ro-
tr(.)
L]J&oo
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
3,1
1i
<l
=l
uJl
EIol
1t
<1
>1
uJl
olol<l1?l
=t
o>,
TJJI
xl
1t
AI
=l
o(J
og\lt'
CL
oO
rdNN
o-
ui
z
(Do
I
I
I
lE
I
I
,,l
3l
CIol<l
<=>l ()
(L
Fo
UJ
oo
=
J(u{qEI(t,Iol
olot.dl
=li
z_
JG
t-
=i'_-b2
zt
=#:z
F
(rFz
2
I
F
dFz
J
tr.F
LIJ)
L]J
<FE()ur<z&.L! F6zo
l.rjz3
LU
='f()t <->o9.1E
lfln
ljINSPECTION REQUESTT ,
WED THUR FRI
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
INSPECTION:
t) '1 1
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr FOUNOATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
APPROVED
CORRECTIONST
tr DISAPPBOVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTORDATE
|l t||i||Yr.il
aINSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
/1" CDATE
/
BEADY FOR
LOCATION:
? (- JoB NAME
INSPECTION:MON
CALLER
TUES WED THUR FRI PM
BUILDING:
O FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W,V,
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
O GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
Etr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
O HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED O DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
,Q
INSPECTION REQUEST I
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
D ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING
D INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
O GAS PIPING
NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
E CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
D DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
o|\\t
ol2
oz
F()
llJ-)oEo-
?(o
TN
u,tF
o
ts
=E
lrJo-
Jz
z
\J:-zed)o
=zf:l
O- LL
..i5
=81=ul il6il>
nnn
E
G,uJo-
tLo
IU
TL
F
tro
Eooo
BEI
.E
=E
E
8
o
zIF()fE
azo(J
oz
F
=d.
II,Jo-
I
l_
t3
I
I
I
I,
IFt<tl6zl=to
tz
3 i I'l''-< O tl Z ;;ii3i!iu'?
<ci-ae!<c <
'')
,h il;.=;:iri_<9(a
< :. ! zFE- <
,r ; r,J !4ii i, I l-!
NO|lVn']VA
YEo
=Z, Z r!-o ootr ^ 6zq 5 >eF9 of,
U'OE.z>-()oar!4QzXl,! <o1 ie-n fr-xz-.YUJH(\o
q
t!
z
=
z
F
tuFJ
=UJz
zoQ.. -.tlJ EtrNfZ'o-oLUJUJ.rEE;=ul
uJOo-z(J
z=(r'i ll)G=.to
2Atn<\-c(!u.ls tr9I EciEOZ
d.r{
(9z
J
tl
ct
F
t{q)€
,9
,t!
q
r-l.ri
ui
=zt
o.tl
+JI
B
,2
Ltl
z
<n
u,.l
a
=
o-
ts =tr
a
o
=
F =tr
<n
<
IJJ
-J
=
cl
+t
E
F{
B
I
trl
UJtroo
Fc
E
tr
oq)
UJ
1
=tr
(,1)au.l
o
J
I
ic c
a
uJEoo
J
=
E
tuJz3o
F
ulF
To
E-rO<FG()uJ<z&TIJ F(.'t Zo
3P
fr3e
t>Y
=#JZLLo
i5
=F?<)-<
Y,z
=g
t-E lr
=J- afo2
J<()o !?.1o'
nEn
l.t t- !, .:r.l r-:'':{-'t- , l- l<o|^'-il";il;ii
.1 l;-:
;,< q.l?i;<ozi'.-r.=-c < :::i:F A;
.1 13-. 1
.-<3(GOt-t
!:iiii.-r <1oi _,'<O;-:erq!:.o<<:-;
I'l
I
I
l.
lr
L'.-rto
xU
Iill-t ll i I
llrllt I-r-ll ; I
llql t!, l':
ItSl ;i
i"
ilrl;,,,ltN tl
II
ril ll.lll t' l5-il ri tt | .l
lill iH r; I H'j loloo 'lzl:..':il te l:l:Pli l; r€l€I li t.t l^r.l ^J | |
ll:(? cl','- t -
UI
LlJ1!u-
=
ctat.uo-
oz
:
u,
o-
ocr
<)()
;1.,
(')
a
:'
(J
(tz6texEaP:IE
-JtrJEe3<ozc)7->'ll1
ttlttl (,'z
.n;. Lr_t ;f,?{
=ic:r- uJ vt+cccA*9. l:, O OTZO
oz
F
trtan
Fz.
c.)
,-
UJC(
F.n?bGZJ.f,s(t(Jzca
=<Ytr, - ';icq6o(,o
I
Lz
zotr
oo
:oU
(:
aa!tt,
9
o
o
oUJ
z'o
F
o-fo
(,
ul(L
F
Y,co
rtoz9
g
()anlrlo.J
GUJz
(,
;J z.oz.,Pz7o)o-: ''-l:)JOO- t!
J.(()()
r-tt-J
J.(9
cct
Ec\3C'
-u
:\,=cIt:
F.:ufi.: al-t o rr-\
..:\
tu
(L
F
F
oi
F
<
9t-
(rJF
z
,(l
t-
a
:c
(
r
.,I:l
t()3..
1,
C
:l )'.rl:' U
o:()
l-
.(t-()
':o
o
l
.(u)
(J
ut
=9
(:(J
(,
f
o-
I
F(J
t-!l
u,
(J
o-
t:
2
o.(,
.-:o--:lcl
(J
(f,
9
5
(J
)
t2
)-o
u,
rl ouvn'lYA
o
::c)
z.YI.l:l*-
H3tIi8
t)J
?
CX
zO
J
=U>z
ril
'll
,ll
ii
..,
lt.
a)
." tii
tt-u't.1
INSPPcTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
JOB NAME
CALLER
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
O FOUNDATION / STEEL D ROUGH / D.W.V
tr FRAMING D ROUGH / WATER
tr GAS PIPING
O POOL / H. TUB
n-
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIF
-
11 _
tr FINAL
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr
EL
tr
tr
tr
F
B
FINAL
ECTRICAL:
TEMP. POWER
ROUGH
CONDUIT
FINAL
.dRppnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
rNSPEcro;'i.1..-s-:., ",'- q- LDATE3- r{- &o
l, ''t' ) L'
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
INSPECTION REOUEST- TOWN OF VAIL
CALLER
READY FOR INSPECTION:MON
LOCATION:
:AM J PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr HOUGH / D.W.V.
B ROUGH /WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr
{
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
n
tr FINAL
tr
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr ROUGH
MECHANIGAL:
E HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIB
oo
tr FII{'AL O FINAL
.6 APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
tffit
,*#"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM' PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
O FINAL tr FINAL
O APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,'rl /2'
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
'i,/t' ," ,' ! / /4
BUILDIT{G:PLU[IBING:
tr
tr
Itr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL tr
o
o
tr
tr
tr
tr
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
O TEMP. POWER
TIEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
-@,i{PPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REOUIREO
DATE INSPECTOR
PERMIT OF PROJECT*iyf'-INSPECTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
MON WED, THUR FRI
O FOUNDATION / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr FtNi*L
ED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
/€7A U
P
il
NSP
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER 7<
INSPECTION:TUES WED THUR
d?e )'E ^ "** <r,-fu r -f 'e4r=
ECTION
TOWN OF
REQUEST
VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
PM
BUILDING:
ts roorrrucs / srEEL
PLUTIBt1{G:
ffou*ooroN / srEEL
o
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATERtr
tr
tr
tr
u
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING GAS PIPING
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
POOL / H, TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTFIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
IIECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FJ}TAL tr FINAL
/2frpeaoveo r] DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECT]ON REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
oor, ,,,,2- z -?4 rNspEcroR
t
INSPECTION REQUESTPERMIT NUMBER PF PROJ,ECT
i .r',: i(i'DATE I -' JOB NAME
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
O UNDERGROUND
.tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
E FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
T] INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL/ H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
tr
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH T] EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr FTTVAL tr FINAL
I.EI-APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
(ffi]
I O .'1 .^1,1 lJ/
,^r, t o
f zj f|l JoB NAME
INSPECTION:
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
READY FOR
LOCATION:
t,
I
INSPECTION REOUEST
VAIL
. J r...to** ot
Cr'\ -l
@ FRt t AV' PM
CALLER
MON TUES WED
'-v i..
,. <r-l-l c l tr-
BUILDING: 'to'(t"h t :(L ; PLUMBING:
'.,1&roortrucs / srEEL I r / t' c( t N,'' l,l ,,'" '7 tr uNDERcRouND
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
ON / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
l'tl ,,, ;,
tr
tr
tr FINAL O FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr flNry-tr FINAL
l;sx tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
- coRREcrtoNs,
m
oor, /a)- : € -W il+ rNspEcro'
,rrt"toN REouEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
r] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
B SHEETROCK
tr
tr
tr
tr
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
r] HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
;atAppnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
INSPECTION:
il
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES WED , THUR
J ,,. " ',
rns#cnoN neouist
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
FRI PM
BUILDING:
T] FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUilBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
B ROUGH / WATER
T1 FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr
tr
tr
tr
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
tr
tr FINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
ISAPPROVED r,E} REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
l't'-/Z-
PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT
oor, l; ! i ; ti:, I JoB NAME
INSPECTION REOUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
READY FOR INSPECTION: ---WED THUR FRI
LOCATION:
- CALLER
BUILDING:..: PLUMBING
FOOTINGS / STEEL ' ,,.-.:.-,cT? tr UNDERGROUND
FOUNDATI o*tsrrr, /tl tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH/WATER
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
cl
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANIGAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL O FINAL
'=fr'aeeaoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*r#"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON , TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE ,
READY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:PLUMBING:
tr FINAL
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL
tr
tr FINAL
tr APPBOVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
INSPECTORDATE
i, ' i
,*r#"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDINGI
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
T] FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
n BOOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
O SHEETROCK NAIL tr
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
d
ROUGH O EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
DATE INSPECTOR
,*rt"toN REeuESr
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES WED THUR FRI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
_AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
PLUMBING:
/ STEEL - tr UNDERGROUNO
ON / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
cl
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRIGAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANlCAL:
O HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT O SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
T] APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
*
| ,,'"1 -.
rlr#cnoN REQuEsr
JOB NAME
TOWN OF VAIL
-r /))
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MoN .'i[Es'WED THUR FRI
'.a ,AM PM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
tr FOUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
ON / STEEL
- ROOF & SHEER
" PLYWooD NAtLtNG tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION tr PcioL / H. TUB
tr
tr
tr
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
D
trFINAL FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MEGHANICAL:
tr
E
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FI tr FINAL
,EI:APPROVED
- CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
h. ,tlr't/viil
,*#"toN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
DATE
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON .
CALLER
TUES THUR FRIWED PMAMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
BUILDING:
6 FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUIiIBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
B FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr GAS PIPING
tr POOL/ H. TUB
n_
r-r _
tr FINAL
[IECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
-
n_
tr FINAL
O FRAMING
,- ROOF & SHEER" PLYWooD NAILTNG
O INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
tr
tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH
CONDUIT
tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
&d,torr^or*af REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
I'
*,*$E"roN REouEsrTOWN OF VAIL
DATE i i'^
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUES THUR {ranWED PMAM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUIIBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
O FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
n ROOF & SHEER" PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
O INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
,g,APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED T] REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
,*#"toN REouEsr
TOWN OF VAIL
',.1
DATE
CALLER
TUES THUR FRIWED AM PMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:MON
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS
F FoUNDATI
tr FRAMING
/ STEEL
PLUMEING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
tr
tr
tr
tr
ROOF & SHEEB
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr
tr
tr
POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
o VED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED C] REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
DATE
,"r#"rroN REouEsrTOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
CALLER
INSPECTION: MON TUES wED THUR FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
AM PM
BUILDING:PLUTTIBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:ITIECHANIGAL:
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE INSPECTOR
o
,^,, t ofte f r/JoB NAME U l(
CALLER
READY FOR I
LOCATION:
roN:
KL
MON TU
rr.rstcnoN REoJ{|"
lP*"re-{OF VAIL'r'J
fO tru*FRI
- A L'l
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
ROOF & SHEER
PLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL/H.TUB
-tr SHEETROCK NAIL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIR
T] APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
NSPECTION REOUIRED
oor=,/-'f /{f rNspEcroR
, o-.r0 c\ i<
UJF
o
zs
z
t; 1TT \
d B'N
J
Y
LIJ
z
\\
-r^tliN
E\
t\
b
E
.S Q-
d]\
o
E
llJ
;z
:
{
$
IJJc
G
J
J
F
F
llJc(
F
JJ
F
F
uJ
G
-)t!
o
uJ(!
uJ
Iz
v,
2
E
UJ
ut
\*J9 H)4:a._= I
\. <\ol F
\t!i
it:\
iilN
iiix
iiA \
,'lI;ii\
uJ
I 3l
\\
I F t\:a t:YI39t<
-/f, E
\Z|,
a
IJz
uJc
I.
d
$c-
2
Y
F
z
F
F
=E
IJJ
z
)
llJ
tl.
Y()
IJJI
z
J
z
a0
E)4
J
9z
I
=
J
F
u,
oIu
2
ul
I
!J
J
F
\|,t
Ytt
3
ul
)z
F
oo
z
tr
EuJ
J
:
3ulz
{
z
:
0
$
z
J
l
F
=I
E
Yo
to
u,Jo
z
rt
cc
tc
ql
2
uJJ
uJ
tc
ul
ll.
uat
..F:<;3
F
z
z )<Y x )(?<T )(x xIi\
N \\
uJ IJJ
I \I
llJ
I
2
3
3
Fx
JJ
=iz
o
uJ
l!
c,lu
o-o
Yz
q,
E
z
F
f-
B
lli
oz
a
ul
Eoz
ro
=o
llltr
o
oz
ulY
E
2
F
ut
z
tr
!t
4gJ
z
|Jo
llt ul
F
llJ
z)
llt
)
c0
o;tt
Az
!z
oz
=E
.iz
soc
E
F
(9z z
E
J
J
Iz
uJE
J
F
uJ)t!
uJ
Fo
J
F
NOtrvnlvn
!
Er
lrlolretg
-,2
=qt- t-'
f
o
-l
>
ruFrY\ hJTlI\t
Ss
$
,$rY --t\)rov.iasf
llJ:
z
$
(tt
\{
z
F
o
<t
u,l
o
C
ililT
c
NI
il
E
z
(\
lr
=
$
IIJ
E
$s
{
$
E
(
\
v
E
rf-
$
scg
-=
uJ
z
e*
=td
ul
o
E
_4$t
sl
$rb
=
IJJE
z
uJ
=
E
I
F
L
=
;
Y
@
\t
F)
F
G-t
t€>(9('
l2l\-,1 u (-
2
HO:
z
F91'&6
q0
=><)>
o. (J>9FO
uLJtl
$\l
z
N
at
$
$
Yi\2
F-illa !\frtsq>
ENo
L-z
b
d
t
u
Nl
F.
\
(
il
$u
J!
\
$
uJEE
zz)c
U]NMO uolf,vgl-.NOJ l.SrrrHcuv 'JSIO
'lvc3't
a
;
t;t,Q
TIoN REQUEST(y
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
MON
4 /a
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES THUR FRI AM
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.tr FOUNDATION i STEE-
tr
tr
FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER
INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr POOL / H. TUB
/r'r'rer- -B FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANIGAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr
tr
SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED O REINSPECTION REQUIRED
)RRECTIONS
ome ,i-// - {2 INSPECTOR
o rNsPftTroN REeuEsr
TOWN OF VAIL/z|\))
DATE J- ta -77 JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
LOCATION:
OU
THUR
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGBOUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr FRAMING
tr INSULATION tr GAS PIPING
tr SHEETROCK NAIL-4" i,e gn,rf!'/}
tr FINAL
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr
tr
tr
tr
TEMP. POWER O HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT
tr APPROVED
COBRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
,i
'l'ioAt
/nO {olNSPEcroR -1( t '-' tl-^-o-o'-l
llt Pthbty/van
DATE
Project Appllcallon
Project Name:
Proi€ct Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
z' tlli v-da'z s:i1l
Architect Address and Phone:/r^s K I
Legal Description: Lot
-
, Block
Zone:
Zening Approved:
Deslgn Revlew Board
Motion by: 96 a Pi'o
s€cond€d ov: f 4c l<ev'
Dat€
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Utaaq^
*ti
e.
feuuo<--,1
di{i o ' a P f,/voue suh
I vu.t ut q,uJ
di
:.
.irL rrb-"vrd It
ai ^teJ 1o co lo,s
Zoning Administrator
*Qrn got/qb
I
Project Application
Project Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
- kf J;> r- -.'t*,+ Q, ," s t 'ArchirectAddress
7,.r. 'ai -l - v *', QFiiio/
./'
Legal Description: Lot , Block , Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
Iii/-lV'.
-
DISAPPROVAL
, ?\ i t-,s
r
Su mmary:
Date:
Zoning Administrator , Chief Building Olficial\
Date:
REQUEST FOR DOOR
VILLAGE CENTER BUILDING IIDII
I have ananged to lease the eoutheast corner of Buildlng rrDrl
in the Vl}lage Center Conplex. In order to uee this epace, whJ-chis a parcel of conmercial unlt B, a glass door is needed in the
6pace of an exJ-sting window.
The window is hl I I lrt inside. It is one of twoeast waII. Both windorsabove the concrete walk.closest to the center of
fron the front of ;he building on the eas';sinilar windows on the south half of theare 39tt wide, B8t' high and start 27"
The wi-ndow to be replaced is the onethe building. (See photo #l).
The glass door that would replace the window is J5tt wide and 78"high. The franing for the door and a slight step up into thebuilding can bring the outllne of the door to the BB'r height andJ9" width cf the replaced window. The extension of the door downto the concrete walk will not be noti-ceable beeause there is a
32tt retaining wall to the east of the w-indows that obscures thebottons of the wlndows.
The two existing doors ln the recess of the eaet wall cannot be
used for access to the leased space because they enter directlyinto another connercial unit.
The addltion of this door would directly affect the appearance ofthe east wall of Building |tDtr when viewed from the Sast, but thiseffect is negated by the 32tt retaining wal-1- obsuring the botton5" of the present rrindows. (See photo #1 and drawing #l). Anyaffect on the appearance of the building when vlewed fron theNorth is greatly reduced by the distance of,the proposed doorfrom the northeaet corner of the bul.|di-ng and becauee of the darkbackground created by the wooden steps that ril1 be noved to just
south of the proposed door. (See photos #2 and #3t and drawing
tfcJ o
Thank you for time and attenti-on to this matter.
Submitted by Joe Peplinski
t,t_
a-
I
\
ia
l{,
i
t.I
t
II
I
! : -.
I
liti
,!
ll
i
I
I
IY
I'
JTI
.ll4-
't
I
o
(t
3ct1Crdc.9FttJ .r.J(.t
> ltt)('
L;^1
ol>oi\?
-
cj
r!
tf
+
S
VILLAGE CENTq,\
_6trrr.t)|t{e'D"
?,1'ro"
I
isTePsiro,itcoil'l
; F LIJ{JIAr-'- -- -
F-,--
It- . -------.-
I!
;
o
department of community dwelopment
June 19, L978
lnwn n
box lfi)
uail, colorailo 81657
(3031 47e5613
Joseph Peplinski
Box 397Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Peplinski:
In regard to your application for variance to
a1low conversion of retail space to a real- estate office
in Vlllage Centre Building trD. and your hearing before
the Planning & Environmental Commission on Tuesday, June
27, 1978, please be advised that this meeting bas to be
reset beeause of lack of quorum for the 27th.
You are scheduled to be heard on Wednesday, June 28, 1978
at'3 P.M.
'' DST/gew
S. ToughillAdministrator
.-7
o
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOIICE IS HEREBY cMN that Joseph peplinski
has applied foi a conditional use permit to allow conversion of
retail space to a real estate oiti". on a fiist froor in the
Village Centre Building D, located on Lot K, Bloek Se, Vail
virlage First filing in a commercial core 2 zone district.
Apprication has been made in accord with seiction 18.26.o4a
of the Municipal Code.
A Public Hearing wi1l be held before the Town of
Planning and Envi.ronmental Commission onJune 2?, LgTg at
p.m. in the Vail Municipal Building. Said. hearing will
the ldunicipal Code.
VaiI
3: OO
be held
Published in the Vail Trail
Village C€ntre Condominium
June 9, L9?8
Associati.on.
p.m. in the Vail Municipal Building.
ln accord with section 1g.66.060 of
or. CoMMUN4Y DEV-Er.oE
]-ana S. ToughillAdministrator
o
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Joseph Peplinski
has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow conversion of
retail space to a real estate office on a first floor in the
Village Centre Building D, located on Lot K, Block 5e, VaiI
Village First filing in a Commercial Core 2 zone district.
Application has been made in accord with Section 18.26.O4O
of the Municipal Code.
A Pub1ic Hearing will be held before the Town of Vail
Planning and Environmental Commission onJune 27, 1978 at 3:OO
p.m. in the Vail Municipal Building. Said hearing will be held
in accord with section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code.
iana S. ToughillAdministratorZoni,ng
Published in the Vail Trail June 9, L978
APPL ICAT l0N fr0R VAfi IANcE
And/Or
col'l0l T l0llAL usE PERII lT
Ordinancc llo' 8 (Sorics of 1973)
App If ca tion Date@Publication._---_.7.........-_-
Fln6l Dec I s lon da to {or Town Councll
'#hon"39l:-526{
I (ve )
do hereby reques+ permission fo appear before the Vail Planning
Cornml ss ion to req uest the f o I lov, i ng :
) Va r i ance f .or A.t i c le-, Secti on
) Zon ing Change f rom to
of ?,,rx 3(i7, r )r\r1(Addrefs)
, a toct fQFor the following
Fl llng l'lumber
C lea r ly state
) Parking Variance =- tf,) condil iona-t'use Peiirit to a tto* , Ro.^ | Frt^Ie O(€,:ccz
rn ,,4 C ,1. zone. t 7Aug.tcit l\4'Gr-.
descri bed p rope rty: Lot/tract'(/ lJr f, li ,n,*
purpose and infent of this application I i, t r.\il -l-D
+-,re,rt\ Of'-rF€ ?rt,, -
tlhal do you feel is 'l'he basis for hardsh i p in this case?
Slgnature i cant
F4d- 5 -7t-s7g
TYP€ OF OCCUPANCY
ELECTRICAL
DATE OF APPLICATION
ra*tt orrrio'o" Xooo'r,o" ( ) REPATR ( )
USE OF BUILOING
SO. FT. OF BLOG.HEIGHT IN FT.OFF ST. PARKING
MAfL ADDREss ?a B OFF ST. LOADING
NO. OF LIVING UNITS
WATER I ) FOBCED AIR ELEC( IUNIT{ I
LOT I BLK FILING
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V I HB
oltoEFGHrJ SPECIFIED
FIRE SPRINKLERS
DRY STANDPIPE ELECTRICAL
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION
TOWN OF VAII
EIUILDINGi ]'EFIMIT
o UNCOVEREO
AP,PLICATION
CCEPTEO
PLAN CHECK
APPROVAL
6T:#/76
I HEREBY
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
VAFIANCE
K""4
READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE
ABOVE TS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY
WITII ALL TOWN ORDTNANCES AND STATE
LAWS REGARDTNG BUTLDINC CONSTRUCTION.
SICNATURE OF O
cF
i)
o
v
F
e!l!.1 ;>E,rF.:<Fg <:I r. Z FF-1P."9
.!_ yztIIF<(,
=hEri uio97e2z - <a
=7.zAs; o <;5IE.ocO<U
>a;:^rt::J:
t<oa!io'.iY
lF" <dO>-l,<o*3tn.q!<d < B.l
==E
Yo!!
Iz
J
z
i!)
vdcc
UJ
z)
qJ
z;
Fz
u1Eu,l
UJ
F
ul
o)
UJcc
F
J
J
ut
E
E
J
F
t-
a
t
=r=HlreO
=z-
=qI
l;E
€Z F*-t-
-->- e- )
"22 ;I
NOrtvnlvn
E
z
E
!J
IJJzuJ
(\l
<-r 9
-A
2
trqq
=^gaA>
:z
=<
>o
F a.l
.o{a
EXITS REO.
DATE OF APPLICATION
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
EPAIB ( }
USE OF BUI LDI NG
HEIGHT IN FT.OFF ST. PAR KI NG
NO. OF STOFI ES
ctrY UAt \ PH.<1169')AL NO. OF LIVING UNITS
WATER{ ) FONCED AIR ( }ELECI IUNIT{ )
LOT BLK FILING COVERING
EXT. WALLS
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V I HN
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J
DlvtsroN1234
BUILDING PERMIT
SPECIFIED PLAN CHECK FEES
FIRE SPRINKLERS
DRY STANDPIPE
iCLEAN UP OEPOSIT
L DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA SEPARATION
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION
7q/qil t ,c._eT0w]{ 0F
EIIJILtr'IAIG!
l|A tt
PEFIMIT
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
VARIANCE
UNCOVEREO
#,TeT "iae
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I IIAVE
READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATD THAT TIIE
ABOVE IS. CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY
T0tvl{ 0F
EIUILEIII\IG
vA tt
PEFIMIT
o
ffi##i;i7aru
READ THIS APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE
ABOVE IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY
,or *orJl'H6 tALTr rq,qa6-
DArE oF APPLrcarroN ?tA L V I (> p1{
r,rnmeJpg uLf rq*r6 *cct
MA'L aDDREss tsodAqb NEW (I ALTERATION ( I ADDITION REPAIR { )
USE OF BUILDING
SO. FT. OF BLOG.HEIGHT IN FT.OFF ST. PARKING
OFF ST. LOADING
NO. OF LIVING UNITS
SO. FT. COMMEBCIAL
WATER (
' FORCEDAIR ELECI I UNIT
LOT BLK FILING
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTI ON I II III IV V I HR
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J
otvtstoN1234
SPECIFIED PLAN CHECK FEES
FIRE SPRINKLERS
WET STANOPIPE MECHANICAL
NERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORX
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
VARIANCE
UNCOVERED
TOWN ORDINANCES AND'TATE
V t ut-a 1c-'. sf ace o I ff scec€C,ENT€TT l"= 4/
IzIrrtt
E
ohlr>t
ob
trEfL
clt
=2or{
\dFI*t<l
t{
C'
=clJ
@
HE
v)xg.o
=co
o-
l-l
3i
Auu wAr-r-5 lrojlr\r-L€D to.l
At,u gLec-TnrgAL tr{orA LLSD
H r bb c 3D Csh6rBusT roJbI Nctas 6cE cr € rc- (eXref rrue')
Bo.r* ?[atFonH:ro bc- Ce4,Pe++b to? f SrDet (,ohetcagp(r.cbtj
TOWN (lF\N
n,
I
N
$.
l'A IL
PEFIMIT
a ''J
fD'
v
3t;)
*
- ---'l
n
{--"I
EIUILEtINGi
e4'-
pEarutt #
,'1 ki{az
THIs APPLicATIoN AND arATf,
VE IS CORRECT AND AGR,EE TO
ALL ?OWN ORDINANCES AND
BUILDING CONSTR
'r,dZ'?A,c-
DATE OFAPPLICATION 19
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
CLASS OF WORK
NEWI) ALTERATION I I ADDITION REPAIR
USE OF BUILDING
SO. FT. OF BLDG.HEIGHT IN FT.OFF ST. PAR KI NG
NO. OF STORI ES
NO. OF LIVING UNITS
MAI L ADDRESS SO. FT. COMMERCIAL
BLK FI LING
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V I HB
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J
otvtstoN1234
BUILDING PERMIT
SPECIFIED PLAN CHECK FEES
FIRE SPRINKLERS
DRY STANDPIPE
SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE
ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF U/ORK AREA SEPARATION
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
VABIANCE
UNCOVERED
DATE
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRA
I?L
Town of Yail
E[.ECIRICAL PERMIT l."iu.€C.
151
,n7_5ffi,Ng
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permit Fee
Inspection Fee
Total Fee
Applicant....
$. ms
$.. ....................
APPROVALS
Date Paid-..-...
Received By----------..--.-.-..--.
4f 'ur6
THIS FORM IS TO BE POSTED ON
.,OB SITE DURII{G GONSTRUGTIOI{
2/r HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE
REQIJINED FOR INSPECTIONS
4";
Project Application
It
li
='1,Owner Atfthess and Phone:
Afchit€ct Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot , Filing
Design Review Board
Morion by: F;, L crf
sccondedov, SL-a f rri)
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
Lt ^ a tzl iv'p'r o 't t
Summary:
Zoning Administrator
Drte:
j
ir i rNsFEcr(tsru F|EEUEST
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED- AM PM CALLER
E orxen ! pnnrrlu. LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
THUR
,.'
TUE
El-nFF]iov E D E orseppRovED E nerNsPEcr
I uporv rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
CORRECT| ONS ' .,.i.-' 9-,, L
\42 /- t
INSPECTOF
DATE
DATE
TIME
tNsiPEc+N FIEGlIJESiT
VAI L./, ,1. ,l l.-.
TOWN O
,,1
RECEIVED r. .. :AM..pM CALLER
E orxen Ero*rror.LOCATION
READY FOR INSFECTION
''-"'MON\*-
COMMENTS:
WED THUR FRITUE AM PM
f] nerNsPEcr
DATE
rNseec*rv FIEOL'EST
VAfL<1-ee4'r4((
.,
TOWN O
E ornen E pnnrrnu LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED 6*B'AM PM
ffiee RovE D
i
ILI DISAPPROVED E nerNsPEcr
El-urrorrr rHE FoLLowr NG coR REGTToNS:
INSPECTOR
o
Town of Vail
F:I.ECIBICAL PERIIIIT Job Name./,/rlLilg-sa--.Ctorrr,re,'.!..L'-'.....(p.*zae*c-t.*.-L-...-Lf.a9.2..-----..
Date of Application-... -..-....fr.a1...t. ...........-..-19..7.5.............
Electrical Contractor-..-- -r-Q.ea-..-.,€*-g7.&.P4..5.-p.9.!-----.---.-.-...---------------.-.Ng
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permlt Fee
Inspection Fee
LL1
$-.......-.....-........-....
s...Pr.oap..?......
,20
$...._.__.J_5_.. =......
$...-...JR..9.......
Total Fee 8........k5-.4..
Date Paid....... . 5, :. /-:..?€.
Received ""...#.?-f-/-.( K,
lrpptieant..- -.X.nJ) ". tf. d,r*rt rt"*-.
SlSDature
APPROVALS
THTS FORM IS TO BE POSTED 01{
JOB SITE DURING COI{STRUCTTOI{
2T HOURS N)VANCE NOTICE
REQUIIED FOR INSPECTIONS
o rNsPEc{oru
TOWN OF
FIEOUEST
VAIL'| .-- ^.-1-l I //DATE4JOBNAME
TIME REcETvED ..,, .n.-i AM ptyt CALLER
f]ornen E peRnal LocATroN
MON
COMMENTS:
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THURTUE FHI AM PM
frottRovED D orsappRovED
fl upotrt rHE FoLLowrNG coRREcrroNs:
CORRECTIONS
! nerNsPEcr
INSPECTOB
DATE
rNseec{oru
TOWN OF
FIEOIJEST
VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED i AM PM CALLER
! orHen
MON
COMMENTS:
n penrrar LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR AM PM
f4npp Rov E D f]orsnppRovED n nerNSPEcr
I upolrr rHE FoLLowrNG conRECTIoNS:
CORRECTIONS
DATE
INSPECTOR
n\rseecrGru F|EEUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED AM PM CALLER
I
I orHen I penrtnl LocATroN
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THURTUE FRI AM PM
COMMENTS:
El.app RovE D
CORRECTIONS
florsappRovED
E upolv rHE FoLLowrNG coRREcnoNs:
f] nErNsPEcr
DATE
INSPECTOR
T0}Tt{ 0t
BUILElING
vA tt
PEFIMIT
ta-{- a,'L iy.,
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
VAFIANCE
UNCOVEREO
o
I HEREEY A
READ THIS APPLIC
,-r^*t, # f
#f;i+-iire
IIA VE
T THE
COI'PLY
STATE
UCTION,
ABOVE IS
WITII
LAWS
JoB NAME (no l) * r,^, / L
DArE oF APPLrcArroN a/tO ts)
NEWy) ALTERATION ADDITION I ) REPAIR( }
I.JSE OF BUI LOING
SO. FT. OF BLDG.HEIGHT IN FT.OFF ST. PARKING
MAI L ADDRESS NO. OF STORI ES OFF ST. LOADING
NO. OF LIVING UNITS
ED AIR ELEC I }UNIT{ I
LOT ALK FIIING
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTTON | / |U l|r rV V I HR
2, OCCUPANCY GROUP ABCDE/F,GHIJ
DfvfsfoN 1n'ls 4
SPECIFIED PLAN CHECK FEES
FIRE SPRINKLERS
DRY STANDPIPE
CLEAN UP DEPOSITCOMB. STANDPIPE
SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE
ENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AREA SEPARATION
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION
SIGNATURE ER OR CONTRACTOR
t t , rrvEieecrGru
TOVY
,,1,
t=drE=t
VAIL
JOB NAME LDATE
TIME REcETvED .l' :
"AM.-PM I CALLE
E ornen j':t iL;: ,,'il-- !1(41B,y'Ln ,o,
READY
WED
E appRovED
! uporu rne
."/"t
'!LLvv
n orsnpPRovED
FOLLowTNG cORRECfl ONi,:
/:'
D nerNsPEcr
CORRECTIONS
l
INSPECTOR
DATE
,rN'st=ttC*s7t\FIEOL'E
VAILNO
'.:r' ! i.l! ' I! r'-.' P JOBNAME
Recerveo ''l-"* nrul?ru. cALLER
,iL-,
WI
DATE
TIME
n orHen
MON
COMMENTS:
n pnnrrel
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR
LOCATION
FRI
El npp RovE D
f] uporrr rHE FoLLowrNG coRRECTToNS:
COFRECTIONS
I orsnppRovED REINSPECTI
DATE
.- :--i;
Project Applicalion
Date
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing
Zone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
in
ii , -,L"1 i ,aMotion by: ' - 'l-
t
Dale
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
i*4 ;^ t) L.1 { L. i'r C ...r S
Summary:
"-f'IVtt"In :,,-^o; d*"n 8 * *1, ,.,lnlhe li ^..ti.
t1 , t {)AV/ -l ,/t VA
.a
..;'/i-'tn,32,; l'i t|""-t ' ,.".,
Date:
Zoning Administrator
Date:
Chief Building Olficial
CONSTRUCTION PE
h' department of community development
PLUMBING
FOUNDATION ONLY
* TYPE OF PERMIT_-_I4fBUILDING L-II elecrRrcll nE MECHANICAL N
LEGAL
DESC.
JOB NAME:|a f.,Ar
ARCHITECT
€11 e
ER
GENERAL
CONTRACTOR
ELECTRICAL
TOR
PLUMBING
CONTRACTOR
MECHANI
CONTRACTOR
OTHER
CONfRACTO
FtLtNGvl&
MAIL ADDRESS
CITY PH.
-.4\rnu / tLL,NtFh)t
MAIL ADDRESS
MAIL ADORESS
MAIL ADDRESS
MAIL ADDRESS
c rry PH.
RMIT DATE PROJECT NO.-
PERMIT NO. N9 1 (l 3
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III I V V
2. occuPANcY GRouP /6"; r r n rvr
DIVISION 122a34
GENERAL DESCR 9TQN OF WORK :
-
k \F./D >eg F FeAr,\.st--
z
tr
)
BUITDING /ru)
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
MECHANICAL
TYPE GROUP SQ.FT. VALUATION PERMIT FEES
BUILDING PERMIT t- C/t '7/2-
PLAN CHECK e-
ELECTRICAT +
PLUMBING e-
MECHANICAL +NEW() ALTERATION ADDITIONAL REPAIR()
DWELLING UNITS
-
ACCOMMODATION UNITS
G.R.F.A-
-BEDROOMS
COMMERCIAL SYST
-RESTAURANT
SEATING
-HEIGHT IN FT.
-
BATHTU B,/SHOWER
NO FTREPLACES
-NO.
TOILETS :_
COVERED PARKING
-
UNCOVERED PARKING
-
RECREATION FEE e-
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD /o
CLEAN.UP DEPOSIT +
L*t t Gu*z(
TOTAL PERMIT FEES z/ry -92?
'aa/zl.
ILDING]f,FFICIAL
INSULATION
NING ADMINISTRATOR DATE
FLOOR
EXT. WALLS
ROOF
TYPE THICKNESS R.VALUE
NING NOTES;
HEAT "il ,,41,(ltl .,(ll tb
r HEREBy ACKNowLEDGE t"^t r r^1,'"Q\),tj{
REA D THfs AppLlcATroN AND srATt rnal ntt',14; 4J4',6
ABovE Is coRREcr AND AGREE To (oMpLY.{\ K-
WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE
ELEC: I GAS:
SOLAR: IWOOD:
VAIL WATER & SAN. OIST. TAP FEE :
SPECIAL NOTES:
ir, 1 // 4 " /'.,/ I t
Project Name: ,i l' I kthu ( l:l U " A'V{'
J
Project Application
,'r. -l .;' - - i ) --t.rrProiect Description: Ly-Ll t& HIL IJA*LI)
Owner Address and Phone:
.j...
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL
5* 1- 3()*
DISAPPROVAL
Chief Building Official
i *'"'"'"o-''
i
Proiect Name:
Proiect Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Project Appli-cation
\, Q-., \a-'*t)(
qrf o,/r', - 1..'K5
Architect Address and Phone:\,,.;+,
/\../r ( 1!9+{<4- L*iAr
Legal Descriptidn: Lot
-,
Block
-,
Fiting
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Zoning Administrator Chief Building Off icial
rNst=.'t*
TOWN OF
l
FIEOUEST
VAIL
DATE
TIME
JOB NAME
RECEIVED AM CALLER
n oruen n pnnrrqL LOCAT ION
READY FOR INSPECTION
MON
COMMENTS:
TUE WED FBI AM PMTHUR
flneeRovED
! uporu rre
CORRECTIONS
n orsnpp RovE D
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
! nerNsPEcr
DAT E
INSPECTOR
a J:t"t Project Apflicatlon
Project Name:
Froject Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
p
Motion by: D t ghO ,P
I
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
{-,.{ fi di r-1,-
Summary:
Zoning Administrator
Date:
BOAM OF APPEAISApril 19, 1979
1O:00 A.M.
Bca.rd Mqnbers Present
Ronn Todd, Jim Viele, George Ihox
Sbaff Mernbers Present
Mark lvlarchus, Buildilg Official
Mark Ivlarchus explained the first item on the Agenda. Robert lVarnerof Warner Properties, Inc. requested that he be allowed alternateventing of the laundry rocnrs in Mountain Meadqrs Phase II otherthan that required by the 1976 lJniform Building Code. See copryof his letter which is attached.
The ductless fan he also requested approval for in his letter wasapproval by the Building Officiat prior to the Board of Appe;lsreetiag.
l[ark Marchus reccnnended that the 1g26 Uniform Building Code beWhe1d. He feels there vrcu1d be too much noisture in the ga-ragesif the laundry roorrs'$€re vented irrto thern.
ldr. Warner gave the rea.sons for his cbjections. IIe feels that thedryers would prt needed hunidity and heat into garages. this typeof venti-ng would save energy.
There was a pneral discussion bet$/een the Board Merbers, BuildingOfficial and Ii,Ir. Warner.
Ceorge l(nox nrade a nntion that the Board not nnke any chan]es in the1976 Unifom BuS.tding Code regarding the venting of the lalurdry rocms.
Ror Todd seeonded the nption. The vote was unanirrcus.
lrfr. L{archus explained the Last itqn on the Agenda. William Pierce
was appearing on behalf of Walter l,loritz wiro would like permissionto change thc ventilati-on requirenent for the kitchen hoocl in ttrc'trdarie Claire Ltd. Restaurant. He vould 1il<e to vent underneeith into'an open parhing garage. See attached letter.
l,to. Pierce had received approval from the Vail Fjre Chief , BuilctingOfficial prior to the Board of Appeals }Ieeting ald requested theApproval of the Borrd of Appeals.
Ron Todd nade a nption to approve the location of the exhaust fan.
Jim \riele sr:conded the rnotion. The vote was unani-rnous.
Jim Viele nade a motion to a{<lrrn the nn'etjng. Ron Todd secondedthe nption. The meeting rvas a.djourncd at 11:35 A.lrl.
T?"c
V SIGN SUBCOMMITTBE t
DATE OF IIEETING:
UEMBEBS PBESENT:
A TION TAGN BY
or'
DES.TGN BEVTEIg BOARq
June 15, 1978
Toni Berns
Fred Distelhorst
Lou-Pa*f<.ec-
Made craire f,ta tristo +K"uf,qc
---=--------/
BOARD:
D',r+ e(hr-'t &.r^,MOTION:
VOTT:I'OR:
SECONDED BY:
AGAINST:
ABSTENTION:
\/APPROVED: A
DISAPPBOVED:
C+.
O
PLU MEil NG / M EC HAr\t r CAL
TOWN OF VAIL
t
-PEFIMIT
usE oF BUTLDING: f 4 DP,t
cLASS oF woRK: fl ruew FLRoorrroru E ne*ooe,- fl nernrn
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
PLUMBING: NUMBER / Id_P MECHANICAL: NUMBER
vALUArfoN $ l,0D()VALUATION $
REMARKS:
t^,S4
hJ y4 tlr *t REMARKS;
f,',JI
,r*",rr# 7 5y PERMIT FEE
K,,M ,^r, (h/r/
t/
rl . .-
gc# S8 ,u -{ ,-1.' | |
@'/' h Y
Town of Vail
f,X,NCTRICAL PERDIIT Job N
Date or Apprication...- b/et ..........-...-.rr-.2-{-
Erectricat contractor-.- - .', 4. Vk.J..n*tl=.N9
Building Valuation
Electrical Valuation
Permit Fee
Inspection Fee
Total Fee
534
$.-.....-.-....--......-.....
$...-..-...........-.........
$-.........-.......-.....--..
Applicant..-..--Stllitlr.
APPROVAI.S
,./.*'W!^
THIS FORIII Ig TO BE POSTED 01{
JOB STTE DURII{G CONSTRUCTION
24 HqJRS ADVANCE NOITCE
REQI'IRED FOR INSPECTTONS
r|ra a. t. faaatl! !4., !l'|vai 110452
; .,),t, I y.al-t:1Y- 37?tlill* *e-
Project Application
Owner Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
Chiel Building Official
o
William Pierce,
Box 57Vail, Colorado
(3O3) 827-s677
April 12, 1979
Archi tect
81657
chier, vail Fire prorection Disrrict ilEr!r,) 4"-'''u=--
Building Off icial, Town of YaiTr/Vr;2+4-zt
Health 0f f icer, Town of Vai1-Jfr]n*
Box 100VaiI, Colorado 81657
RE: Kitchen Range Fan for Marie Claire Lrd.
Sirsi
Per uy discussions r,riEh you regarding the location of a proposedkitchen fan system for Marie Clalre Ltd. in the Village Center BuildingttD", I would, ar. this time, formalize our arrangeuents. My di.scussionswith Larry Ryder, the Attorney for the Town of Vail concluded that wichwritt'en approval from you that this matter could be heard by the Boardof Appeals of the Tom of Vail.
Summarize Our. Discus sion:
Due to the difficulty of terminating the kitchen duct system atthe roof of Village Center (Due to proxinity of adjacent r^rindows
and problems of noise and maintenance) an alternate location
would be desirable.lJith the location of Marie Claire Ltd. at Lhe extreme eastern
eud of Village Center Building ttD", adjacent to an entry ramp
and above a parklng garage, a logical location for the fan would
be the parking garage. The termination of the duct system would
be in rhe wall of tire vehicle entry ramp iuunediately east of
Marie Claire Ltd.
?hat the proposed locations of this equipment r,rould not negativelyaffect the inhabitants of Village Center or other persons.
Your attention to Ehis issue is greatly appreciated.
Liam Pierce, Architect 7!/t/\./\ ___-/
To
b.
c.
te /u
T0wr{ 0t
EIUILElII\IGi
lJA IL
PEFIMIT
o
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
UNCOVERED
VARIANCE DATE
WITH ALL TOWN ORDINANCES AND STATE
EXITS REO.TYPE OF OCCUPANCY
DATE OF APPLICATION
MAIL ADDRESS
'O,
// ?,NEW { ) ALTERATION I ) ADDITION (f REPAIR
USE OF BUI LDI NG
OFF ST. PARKING
OFF ST. LOADING
NO. OF LIVING UNITS
AIRI IELEC( }UNIT( I
LOT BLK FI LING COVERING
1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V IHR
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP A B C D E F G H I J
otvtsroN 12 3 4
SPECIFIED PLAN CHECK FEES
FIRE SPRINKLERS
DRY STANDPIPE
COMB, STANDPIPE CLEAN UP DEPOSIT
SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE
AREA SEPARATIONENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION
'l/2"1*
,\*^qrtj€r.*-"#" rror r ro{{i .ah/
R EAD rH ls Appl,rcArroN AND srATE rHAr ,"#tlft'7
ABovE Is coRREcr AND AGREE to coupl{ e- ' I
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR
:l IrNsoe.ilrru
TOWN OF
FIEBUEST
VAIL
DATE JOB NAME
TIME RECEIVED ..' 1 AM,PM CALLER
TUE
n pnnrral.LOCATION
READY FOR INSPECTION
WED THUR FRI AM PMMON
COMMENTS:
n orHrn
E nppRovED
LJ UPON THE
CORRECTIONS
florsneeBovED
FOLLOWI NG CORRECTIONS:
fl nerNsPEcr
DATE
INSPECTOR
IrNsieecr}ru
JoB NAME :l ,,t, ,' ;rro,- ,ll"- 1,;-t-,r,-.
TOWN OF
FTEEUEST
VAIL
TIME RECEIVED ,;CALLER
n orHen
MON
COMMENTS:
iLI PARTfAL.
READY FOR INSPECTION
TUE WED
..
I THUR AM PMFBI
Ei npp RovE D
El uporu rse
CORRECTIONS
florsnePRovED
FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS:
E nerNsPEcr
DATE
INSPECTOR
at
We,f -
Ft^-.^.fg
dra'
T0ttJil 0F t|Att
EIUILEIING PEFIMIT
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL LOT AREA
FLOOR AREA RATIO
EASEMENTS
VARIANCE
UNCOVEREO
}
APPLICATION
ACCEPTEO
PLAN CHECK
APPROVAL
d
(,.
nI
EXITS REO.
'rur+crg CEprr*-\/at
OATE OF APPLICATION
MAIL ADDRESS I C] /NEW{ I ALTERATIONF[ ADDITION { IREPAIR{ )
SO. FT. OF BLOG.HEIGHT IN FT.OFF ST. PARKING
MAI L ADDRESS NO. OF STORIES OFF ST, LOADING
NO. OF LIVING UNITS
MAIL AODRESS
LOT BLK FILING
EXT. WALLS
r. TypE oF coNsrnuclo@ rr rrr rv v r HR
2. OCCUPANCY GROUP a@coEFGHrJ SPECIFIED PLAN CHECK FEES
FI RE SPRINKLEFS
WET STANDPIPE
DRY STANDPIPE
CLEAN UP DEPOSIT
SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSUFE
EFAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
OCCUPANCY SEPABATION
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR
!
Fartnership
pC. -,i"i;;:1j6i,Yr lAlA
Novsnber 22, 1983
Baldwin and Assoclates, Inc.
1000 S. Frontage Road West
Vall, Colorsdo 81657
Attn: Richard Baldwin
Dear Rlck;
This tetter is to acknowledge that the Ruoff Partnership as
Archltects for the Hotel Sonnenalp at Vall will work with your
firm in the design of a service and delivery zone on the west
end of the Sonnlnalp property. After completion of the-.Hotel
Sonnenalp renovation,'thls servlce and delivery 2.919 will be
for the f|int use of the Hotel Sonnenatp and the Village Center
Shops.
At this time we are reasonably certaln that Karlheinz Faessler.
the owner of the Hotel sonnenalp, wlll agree with this arrangement.
when Herrn Faessler ls in Vail the first week of December, vle wi ll
discuss the delivery rone with him and lf there are any new con-
siderations we will be in touch with you.
Sincerely,
Ruoff Partnership Architects
WJR /sa
;I
II:1
i
Vr',llranr .l Iir/rll A I A
:, ney scnriitjr AIA
/.llenf -ffll.,y;L AIA
ii,,;, r I l-a.,d r. 41 ..
r.1.r . ',1
G.l.T. Financial Gorpqliontt
650 C.l.T. Drive
Livingslon. New Jersey 07039
201740-5286
)
H. A. lttleEon
Execulive Vice President
ilanuary {, 198{
-.Slnocrcly your!,
,'1
cir
Mr. Fr€d Blbberd
ELbbcrd Con.tructlon ConpanY
1977 South Park Rt,
ilacheonl wymlag 83001
DGar I'lt. Btbbcrdr
Elrank you y€ry nuch f,or your lettcr of Deaenbcr 1{.
My epologlcr for taklng a whlle to got blck to you'
but t'vc bcen away for the holldayr and have Jurtreturncd.
I vlll be ln and out of, vaLl on an I'rregrular barl'a
and, theroforo, rould apprecl.ate lt lf you rcu16
look to trlr. Cectl Dotron, Presldent of, Vlllage
CentGr Atrocl,ation ts ny roPr€Eentative. I arn
taklng ttre llborty ot acndlng hln a copy of thLrlcttei and bave vrtttan hLa LndlvlduaLly aeklnghtn to aepretGnt ny lntcrett. I contlnuo to f,eelthat thc proJect rould bc dlradvaltlgcoul to near an orner of a condonlnlun Ln Vlllage Center and
oqually lnportant, d!.ladvantegsous to tbc arei.
?hs ralronr, of oouttc, scro outlLncd ln Ery lcttcr
of Augrrrt 3I to !la. P.t€r Patton.
lhaDk you agaln for your lsttcr and your intGrcrtln nrtting rlth ne. I!.m sure yourll underetand nyInablllty to nehe tchcduloc f,rm thls far awayl
but f knw that Ha' Dotson'rlll rcPrescnt my
lntcrcet.
EAI/cap
ccr !|tr. Cecll Dotron /!lr. Pcter Patten r'
R. B. Loulhan
.Vice President
dLATO Product Line Management,
Develooment & Services
GD CONTKoL DATA
8100 34th Avenue South
Mailing Address/Box 0
MinneaDolis, IVN 55440
612/853-6069
\
?
/?o. ?.s ZoGo
1J".iI, eo" 8/6s-z
6v
Tzol for* Kut' St:. 'g,ozrs
E&ne, IV.fr.ftfuls-
fl6*. I rrvr
Mn. P.t ^ Pa-rze^r
"\)";..e P1..r,..i1
?1; So. 6-'-..L-r* R\.
1).riA, e,\, &r(..f z
TI'' !-ltz' i h .$u... /os.r r.$- t -/+-t /.* J,'Lu,, fl-f I"^-
th €,,t,!"+ d {'li Co* Cr'r$..szr,,r.rcr.s.'' ,4rno.r-Li oL*L { !& O.rr"o;
l.o..,o='-t-i ".,o.-to.-$ D( T/. /s- Co,,!ro Owraqvr "i \)rll-; C.*-to^,,
!.r,lJ,'1"3", Itt'. -6-r.\ N;f !"^\ )u ot4^'* 4 e L-{o.,* .J P.,./J.-l D,
jo a. ..,'.1,-\h-1, e€w ,1y.ru",o{,oc.
9 -*4 A."..$ v,q ce.',/ -DoL s.. Lrl- flu. ,(,!!o$ I,- 64tro"*$* $Efrt^-D -\^>t t, .'...'. !Jr1J.i. So.'.*-(.'.- /o-.. ^."f|,:o [-- .*of
g*,7r.*r--3 *5 ".$.,*' /.:. a".o-L.l/i'f U-V\ yo' 6&* "$t'"'
-vt* "l {^ ',JL"^" .1, tL 6 - 6 -rS ,\.,-S;t- ?
4IJ.f.
.r?, ffi>,p*,J..f
J v,ll.5. Co* C-"Jo lo,o;.*1;u.
( rtrr. Dr u,l1.J. C"-t- &*,*r)
Pf .' (:-:) -
(ctz) -
4')L - ts tl
ta >- - ?+,rc
PEc -2- 10/'|,/BQ
He added that he had told the applicant that the board wouldtoday, and had recommended deniai with the suggestion _tha+ t the proposal
icant appiy
acf, on
applagain in November. Donovan moved and piper s6ion ode thd.I 'icati on forlack of information.--ThE-iote-was 5-0 in favor o den ial .
uest for an exteri or a I terat ion to bhe Villa e Cente ect at 122
(15 L aoow ur ve to add a new reta i add i )L to rev i setheentrance to Toymaker's Tra iI , to construct additions to the retail shto construct a new si the nor sloe o ect.'icant: Fr Hibbe
)
IgJnd.e
Corcoran read aViele moved and
from the
seconded
to table this item untilof 0ctober 24.
t0 /24.
Vote was 5-0.
i etter appl icant askingto table until the
4.
Pioer meeti n
uest for a conditional use permit in Commercial Core II in order to constructcommerci a stora e units in the lower oft ncert Ha aza.
Appl icant:e Val 1ey I nvestments ,
The applicantto table the
asked to
item until table until
October 24.
0ctober 24. Donovan moved and Corcoran secondedIne vote was 5-u In tavor of tabIinq.
space, conference space and a deluxe sui-te.osal includes mod'ificationsto the "L aza" adjacent to Founders to the oarkin ot on thewest side and additional stoiaqe space on t street leve on the nor t sideoftodqe Sout ildinq.cant:ge at Va Lodge Sout
Assoc i at i on .
]oc!ers. The vote was 5-0.
Dick-Ryan reviewed the memo. Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, showed amodel and asked if the PEC could vote first on just the storage for the Lodge South.Alan. Tafoya, representing Ruoff Partnerships, the architect, ihowed where tie storagein.the parking area of Lodge South would go. He added that there would be 16 lockeis,which would be minimizeo wjtn doors facing into the garage. The garage would be
f:!l^:l op:l vellilated-garage. Trout moved and Vieie seconded to approve the storaqe
Jay then discussed the model and its different aspects: the new entry and rearrangedparking lot, ski storage and employee cafeterja, ind the new Internatlonal suite.Viele asked what would happen to itre 2 spruce trees next to the entrance when theparking lot was rearranged, and Peterson responded that they would attempt to movethe trees to another location. Concern was expressed about the closeness of theInternational wing to One Vail Place. Peterson said that One Vail Place overhunqits property line. He added that the architects had considered moving the top sloryof the International wing to the west, and were dissatisifed with the"app"a"ullcu.Vjele asked if there were technical problems with the buildings so close'together,and Peterson said that they would have to use special glass
Trout said that he had difficulty with having only two feet between the buiidings.
l]9 suggested taking space from the other end-of the w'ing and move the whole uuilding.He approved the rest of the proposal . Martha Fritzlenl a resident of One Vail plaie
stated.that everyone who lived in CCI was concerned about narrow alleyways and allor lnelr problems. Donovan stated that she felt that the building had been designed
PEC 9/26/83
f!^oul[gved to !"ecomrnend approva] of the zone district as proposed by the staff withthe followinq chanqes:
0n page 1, Section 18.39.030 B.l. delete "recreation room/minor arcade.
page 3' Section 18.39.050 A. add #ll, Redevelopment of sk'i lifts and tows
Section .|8.39.050 A. delete #6, Alpine slide
Section '18.39.075 Prohibited Uses, add #7 Alpine Sl ideadd #8 Any other uses not specificallypermitted or conditional in thjs
page 4
page 6, Section 18.39..l20 A. eliminate "low dens.i ty"
page 7' section .l8.39..l70 Height, el iminate alI word'i ng after "..35 feet" andinsert "up.to 60% of the building (building coverage area) may be builtto a height of 35 feet or'l ess. No more than-40% of the-building(building coverage area) may be higher than 35 feet, but not higherthan 43 feet. Towers' spires, cupolas, chimneys, f1 agpoles, and similararchitectural features not useable as Gross Resjdential Fioor Area mayextend above the height lim'it a distance of not more than twenty-fivepercent of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet.
Page 1, section .l8.39.030 B.l. "whether it be a perm.itted or conditjonal use,,after the words ',Retail sales s0ace."
4' 4 rgquest.fgr qn exterior alteration to the Liorlshead Arcade in order to buildu aorru.a i u l
Donovan qqconded and the vote was 5-l with Corcoran votin aqainst becaus fel tthat he not understand Tu the c anqes.
Viele moved and Pierce at which timercrE moveo ano rrerce secOnded to tabie untfl gctober l0the PEC will act to approve or den.y.
A request for an exterior alteratiory'to the Vi.l laqeEast Meadow Drive to add a new reta6l aaaiifffii l Sestruct additions shops,north side of
entrance to Toymaker's Trail, tof,o construct a new sidewajk alongAppl icant: Fred Hibberd "
Peter Patten sajd that the staff had been working tothe Village Center complex. ife feji if,it it shoutdhadn't been solved, and needed further review.
include a master plan forbe tabied because some problems
the
andcot
Center proJe
e east end, toto the
the pro
reta
Trout moved and Donovan seconded to table until l0 83. The vote was 6-0.
o
I
lnwn n utl
42 west meadow dtlv€
Y8ll, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
MEMO
: Peter Patten
: Mike McGee
: VillaEe Center ImProvements
: 2OJulY 83
llre departmenl
TO
FROM
RE
DATE
After reviewing the proposal and visiting the site for the
r :
proposed Village Center rmprovements ' the Fire Department
makes the following observations
1. The architect for the last nimprovemento, Bill Pierce'
stated to me durring the approval stage and plan review'
that the new construction would be sprinkted' When the Fire
Department inspected the site, we found tbat the sprinklers
hadbeendeleted.Inaddition,theflrealarmsystemrequired
and approved for the last phase, was never installed as per
the plans. The installi-ng electrician took several weeks to
complete the work and pass inspection, after the TCO was
granted. Subsequently, any future construction at that
location will be carefully evaluated, tested anci inspected'
2. The parking garage beneath Buitding D are required to
' be sprinklered and were in fact, reguired at the time
of the last construction' The plan checli by the Build-
ing Department did not catch this fact due to the failure
of the architect to'indicate the existing details. such
parking structures will need to be sprinklered before the
Firc Department wiJ'l grant any future construction'
The distance betwecn the nct/v construction and the existing
a
f2 wesl meadow drlve
v.ll, colorado 81657
(303) 476-2200
flre deparlmenl
-2-
building should, or rather, must be no less than 20 feet'
l.lith the elevation of the existing building and the total
lack of fire department access, the 20 foot seperation j-s
needed to allow us to place a ladder against the side of
the building and operate under fire conditions'
The relocation of the gas meters will need to be
addressed. Gas meters should be locatetl in such a
way to facilitate ready access and distinguishment'
5. Whereas the retro fire alarm ordinance applies only
to existing structures, a fulJ. fire alarm system wilJ-
be required. In addition, due to the increased fire loading
and proximity of buildings,- limited access and water for
fire fighting, we recommend that the required fire alarm
systems be installed in the other buildings as wel1, as
part of,or durring,the construction process' We feel this
is necessary due to the potential for fire $pread from one
structure to another.
We would desiie a fu11 set of plans to review at our officer's
meet ing .
4.
TO:
l'ntl"1oR'N'lDU}
pLtJlli rlic AltD El'ivi'RONI'illNTAL cour4I
FROM: DEPAtiTI'lEliT OF COi,r}lUNt'rY DE\TELOPI'IENT
lerE: 8/I9/8O
) foor building east of villrge centerRE: tiii;il; 3i i"i:?33 ::":';Ji"::"i:*;"1.11;'I.:::"::'1":'ll"n'
iiist ririttg requirr-ng- Do1
Exterior rl"ilif ituti 6q hp-proval '
?-PP1 icant: Fred HjJeberd
d in a Comrner:cial Core II Distlici:'
Tirc \tr}-l-age Center -is -locateso, a1t.)rcirgi: i. !!"il""l"a aa3."f,',1--to vail- ''ririlgll"i"-io: rr be revictied
unoer i'he \rail rr-ttiage . and. \'a-i'1 -ii"lrt=nu^tl D:r'srgn 6c,nsrde':ataons ' ri--
;';;1.,"J;;:;; -l:i;*3";;.i=" i*i .
;r i;";; "u'i'.ii n"
"
j e n Gu id e P i an'
and v,'ill be revteweu 'rJ ' -"
^^ dinq located to Lhe
ou".'i? $i?i:;:'.1i.5?'"iri;?33.i"I:;"":;"lftil";;?";!a
-po'*i"gt'
The 4,000 square fcet is co "o,'u.,i"i'or_i,goo-=q',^iu
feet bf groulrd
level cofmercial space and a "tJ:;;;;";i t'too tq""t" foot rnanaqerrs
apartment.
This proposal must be revie'rved 'nder 'two separate'proce::::.',. Deirsj-ty
control variance
-.ra -r*t"rr-or r.roalri";;;";: . tl:-o""sity cc'r:":?r^u=t ia-::ce
is nee.ed tot t''t"-t'roo sq rt. '=""glf 'e-urrit' since thJvil)-age center
is current.ly in ;";;.;-.;'boLh ij'l'""iI and its =iittt lootage standa=is'
In lookins at tl're past his't:-:v of the vi1-'1-an".i3"-i3i'-"i;lllti'ot ]
t:::;"tii::;:tu!?'*::'::ii: i:tt*;:'iill:;?"!h:i,::iy:::"i':; ?li""u
in excnanee for-a i"i'o""p" ot::::; ::l:l^":"51?"!;":;ll-"e"u":' ]fi'"-i,"ial"s'- ttii"ltiiiEt!li"lti:5";";;ii-ats9-t'a'"" to eo co the^ror"'rt
li*:!lerit,-:"i"',;il;i;; .^.,',ai,,e-ii!"iii,li"n No' ii' s'ii"s or re74'
l
I
I
.
STATTSTICS
Total -r,and irrea =
Total iJo.
'lotal r'-o.
65,299 sg ft
of Units Allor"'ed:
of llrrits E>:isiing:
52 ,239 E,q
6lj,038 sq
37
62
un.its
ui'r ii- s
GP.I:A .Allo';c'd:
GiiFA E>:isting:
C,:;-;;:e;-cj.a1 j:'rj luinq !l: 5' 150
ft
S-{: - -
I
A.
Village Center Bldg D - 2 - 8-19-80
##3,ffi5?i#tr#&T#*-*-2sr)e
col4pLlANCE vtrltH vAll, _I4_qIrgE_r4_rJEg4!-!'riqlGN C:UrDE PL'?'-Ir Ai{D DqgiGN CoJSr-
rrenauoxs
2. Urbc.n Design Conside:-ations
a.Peiestrianization:Theproposedadc]itionwillenhancethepedestri-" ";;;;;""""-uv n.xitrg'tl-re scale of the buildii-rgs a mole
comfortabie o-ne for the p"rroi, -walk-ing between the Transportatron
center ".,a cto!"t""at'- i"'otr'"t"iutt 6r tlis,proposal is {-o work
with the Town in tl]e Const-t""tioi' of a peciestiia'n wa1i"v;ay along
t}e souLh side of Village n""al---tl1i= tirr greatly e::hance the area'
b. V;hicle Penetration: A service and drop-off area shorrld be
in"otPotuted into the new design'
c. Streetscape Framework: This proposal will vastly irnprove
. the Pedestrian e>:Perience'
d. Str.eet Enclosure: Thrs; building adcition r,''iII j:n-o::ove the
' street ur,"rotill-siiu-tion uj' ieoucing the impact of the larger
bu-il<ling in the backqround'
e.Si-r:eetEdge:l|heSL::eet-E<jqeu-i11i-,.:cornesl.'ghl.lylrcreregularr';lt:ichrjntniscas;c,r+ille:rhii:il':i-hep':i'ist-r-i;ne>:pe:ii:trce'
f - Building Iieighc: The L"vo I'cvcl plc1:csa} is r+ell uncle-r the
a1lo'.sed t-,ui-1oi-nE height '
S. Viev.':;: llc v:-c'i"s a::e i:'r1;'rc-"cd i:y 'ui:i-s pro2csal- '
li. Sun .l)ratle clti):9c5: llo-' l;igirrif -i-ca-ilt'
='-- esign Guide Plani, Sub-Area ConcePts of Urban Dt
Number2IoftheEastl"leadowDriveSub-AreaCotrceptsdescribesaonesi:ory acldition ot-"itiitr size to'che one pr:oPo="'a i" this reguest' The
proposed ad,liLron does have . r"Ioia*uloty- -(t";]ete the manager's unj't i-s)
but this seccno storl' vould' r'trp"io*ui;;k- the raiqer building behind it
uhich is atso specif-ical1y menti""Ia"-iti-iir':-'r'ber.2l] vie feel that t'he
senerar intent ";'N;;;;-ir i= b;;;; iorro'ota L'v '-his request'
TheCorrurrrercialCorellDistrict.isintendedtoprovidesitesforamixt-ure of multipi! iitriit'e=' r"igl"' i"a^cou*e'cial' establishments
in a clusl-ered. iilri"a at"'6rop*"''i' The comirrer:cial core 1r District
is intendeil to ""=it"--oeqr'rate'1i;;i'
airt -?pt^ ti"t"' and ol-)rer amenities
ipp'ep' i" !:, :" :'lilr:i'ii; t;:' ff :::i"?;;i' :l!.ri? ;6r' *rli:i:':i:" ;? ::
the desirabre qui
development "tt'Jtta'' :rrre commi;;;;i-coie'District 11 is intended to
includesitestorresidtiliirut;i;il;t-ala"''tiiiett-tottoexceedtHentv-five awerling units Per acre'
The propcsed addition cloes co1p1y with the pulpo'se sect-ion by creating
another building *fri"n r.,'cu'd Ua iflii".;-tti;h-the e>:isLing developrne..'t
and r,rould actuarly create . *ot"-ir,;;r;a development' The p::esent 1a-r''c1-
scaped ar:ea..o ti'" i""!-tr-""iraiig'ij'ii ;;g !i!' ou"" an evesore and will
never funcLron p;;;;lt -= Li-tn"i '1seable or aesthetic open sPace'
Village Center Bldg D-3,8/19/80
3. Zoning Code Considerations
Tbe 4,000 square foot addition gener:ates an additional parking reguire-
ment of approxirnately 11 spaces, vrhich cannot be accurately determined
untit more specific floor p)-ans are subrnj.tt-ed. The cotr'nercial part of
{:he parking requirement vrould be assessed at.$3r000 per space, i-he resi-dential ai: $5,000 Per sPace.
RECOI.I!'IENDATIONS The Department of Coi*',raunity Development
reconinends approval of the commercial part of the proposal ds '-h€
proposal si:ecifically orients itself to the objectives of the Urban Design
Cuide plan of Vail Village and Lhe Design Considerations for Vail Licns-
head with the following conditions:
1. Tbe applicant agrces to participate in and not renonstrate against
a special improvemetrt dist-rict if and vrhen formed for Vail Village.
In aclditiori, agrees to tledicate r""he I arrd necessary foriie exclusive
fp5/pedestr-ian lane if deter--mined by the To\..ryt as tbe appropriate
desigrr solution for this area.
B.VARIPNCE REQUEST REVIEVI
CRITERIA 4ND FINDINGS
Upon Review of criteria and findings, Section 18.52-060 of the
;iprr coa", the Departr,rent of colrmunity Development reccr,dr,ends
oi'ti.ru reo-ucstec ./ariance based upon tfie fo1 lowi-ng factors:
q9!i.ilg1gEgn of Factors .
1. The rela'clonship of the requested variance to bther existing or Po-
tential uses and structures in ttre vicinity:
The current \/illage Center conplex is 25 units and 12,800 sq ft over
vrhat is pr.esentty aIlowed. The only type 9f Density control Variances
that rve ?eel- is acceptable is for bona fide emplo1'ee housing. 1'e
question j-f an I,100 sq ft iiranager's apartment is bona fide einployee
housing.
Z. The degree to which relief from the str:ict or literal interpretation
and enforce:nent of a specified reg'ula-tion is necessary to achieve com-
patibility and r:niformity of treatrnent.lincng sites in the vi-cinity or
i;-;t;;;;'the objectives of this title v.'ithout grant of speciar privilege
We feel that a I,100 sg ft managert s apar'rment r,'ould not be consistent
uith the intent of the Ordinance and could be consideied a granl of
s1,eci al pri vilege.
3. 1,n: ef ic-ct Cj ',-,'re i:cq:)'j sted ',-a;-- j i:rrcc ol 3 ighL and aj:,-. rii s:::i l-'ruticli
of pc;pulalion, transpciti:tion and traffic facj-liLies, pul,1i-c facilities
;:nd uiif ii:ies, ano PubIic safetl'-
iioirc of t:hese i lcirs are i-f f ected bv tiri-s :--equesi '
l'luni-
denia-1
I
L_'.
4.
Village Ccnter Bldg - page 4 - 8-19-80
Such other factors and criteria
to the ProPcsed variance '
as the commission <leems aPPIicabIe
There are no. oLher pertinent factors '
FINDlNGS:
ThePlanningandjjnvironmenta].Commissionshallma]<ethefollowingfindings beiore granting a va::iance:
.ThatthegrantingoftherrariancewillrtotconsiitrrteagrantofspecialprivileqeinconsisLentr^li-ththelimitationsonotlrerproper{-ies..
Ltassified in the same district'
That the granting of tl-re vdriance vrill not be detrimental to the public
heal1h, safetlr, or \,felfar", oi- irraLeriarry inju::ioris -Lo propert-ies
or improrrenents -'i.n Lhe vicinity'
.T]ratthevarizrnceiSliar:rantec]f6l6lneormoreofthefollorving.
rea son s :
T]res'"rictortiteralinterpretationandenforcementoftlrespeci_
f ied regulation r.ro-.il,d not rLs'It in practical difficulty or unneces-
sary physical hardship inco;;i;;";t iritr, ttr. object.ives of this
title-
Thereareexceptionsorextraordinarycircunsl-ancesorcondiLionsapplicabl" to ir," site of ;;;-;;;i;nle that do not applv seneralrv
to other properties in the same zone'
rire strict or literal interpretation and-enfor::Tt-:: :I-:::: specifiei
regulatio" to"ia deprive thl appli:ttttt,of privileges enjoyed by
the or'''nert ;f-lh"; ir-perties in tr'e same district'
!E3@
Depar-!-ment of Ccnrrnun ity Development recommencis de-nial of
1r100 sq ft managerts apa::iment' our suggestion would be
lrl-00 sguare ieei be aiviaea into two smaller units that
solely for long term etrployee unl-ts'
the requestedthat theare used,
I
o
Re: Village Center Retail
Shops Addii:i-on
VILLACE
CENTER
Colorado
Dear Member.s
&
.
August 20, .l9B0
The Town of Vail Planning CommissionVail
of. the Town of Vait Planning Commission,
This letter is to give informatj.on conce:r.ning the proposed..addition to the Village CenLer Retail Shops, - The ptairnedaddition will be constructed on a portion of the covered deckeast of the existing Village Center Shops.
The history of this deck goes bac]-. to April ctf Ig74. at tf,istime, prans lrere approved by the Town oi vair under ResolutionNunber L2,'L974 1-o construct a landscaped plaza area in lieu of22 parking spaces, which rvould have been required- on the deck.As part of the 1980 Vaj_l Village.urban design pIan, commercialexpansion is being proposed according to the plans being pre-sented, fn addition, I will be making land available to theTown of VaiI for the pedestrian loop on the nor.th side ofVillage Center, and for the torvn bus route on the northeastsection of the Village Center property.
These changes will most 1ike1y reguire an amendment to ResolutionNumber 12 series of L974. The irrtention here is to still providea landscaped plaza area. The plaza itself will contain planterson the southeast side of the plaza. The concrete section of thedeck will be covered with paver bricks.' And in the center of theplaza will be additional planters to round out the landscaping.
Arr of the changes mentioned above are an effort to make improve-ments according to the urban design p1an, which should result ina more pleasing and a more functional ansr.Jer to the area.
S incere ly ,
;:i;"7ZZt*7.b'r-ed llrDDerdVillage Center
Ccmrnercial Shops r
'|
.l
Hinutes of SePtr:ribcr 8, 198O lteeting
MEMBERS PRESENT
Gaynor I'liller
John Perkinscerry white
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Jim Morgan
STAFF PRESENT
.tim Rubi-n
Betsy Rosolack
gggNcrt t'lEMsER PRESENT
Ron Todd
The meeting was called to order by Gerry White'
t. Approval of minutes of August 25, 1980.
Roger Tj-Ikemeier corrected the minutes saying that he had abstained
in the vote on the Lionshead Gondota building. making the vote on that
6-0, with one abs'Lention
Roger also felt Lhat he had voted in favor of item # 6, a setback
varidn6e for Lot 34, Block l, Vait MeaCbws Subdivision, Filing 1.
That vote would Lhen be 6-1 in favor of denial'
,fQhn Perkins seconded-the .motion for adjourtrment for that nteetiug.
EdDiagermqredthese minut-es be approved subject_to the al>ove changes.
Roger -tilkemeier seconded, the vole was 7-0 in favor of approval
2. Approval of minutes of Septernber ), I9B0 rneetinq'
Dan corcorau moved these minutes be approved' Ed Drager seconded'
and the vote for approval r,/as 6-0. Gerry white absta.ined.
3.Village Center Buildin Tract C, Block 5E, Y4!f-Villaqe -l-s!-.F:LULlgDensiLv Control Variance and an nxterior llodif ication to constmct
a 21900 square foot commercial space and a IrI00 square foot manager's
apartment addition.
Jim Rubin presented the sLaff memorandu:n stating that this item had been
it should be posiponed another 30 days to permit a look at the bls and
vralkways.
Discussion followed suggesting trvo concepts: The inclusion of a second
,iory rvith a smaller t6ot print, or a one story rvith a larger foot print'
Some felt that it may be bLtter not to discuss Lhis now, since they vould
irave to go back in 3b days to see vrhat Jeff lrrinston of Gage Davi-s Associale:
had planned.
Gerry l,{h-ite felt that in aII fairness to the applicant, he vras entitled
to fl_nd out the cornmission members' reaction to i-he plan.
"-**7-''(r_rrr''ro_r ;;;r.";r rhc twoProPosll s e nrtd cor.mcn tod thct tho a slory-*.r=, actuilry L-L/z s-.orics.llc added that, for tr,o-rc.ora, thcy might want. to vrait to see ahere thebus routc vrouid .o*. ir,----
irim Rubin stated Lhat the urban Design Guide plan used one story as a g:\rice.Discussion of height followed, and riea teit that ther. or.=--, inaccurecvin the urba-n oesign cuide plan outline-oi-suirding D. He repeated theidea that they roait until the bus route was known.
John Perkins added that there would be high vehicular traffic on thiscorner, and that-might influence their deci-sion
Comments from the members :
.Tim Morgan: r feel that the originar presentation was a better transitio:rin fOOf line. 7Lt'<-. L yl-e>srl LdtJ-c
Ed Drager: rf the guide lines suggest one story, r feel we should staywith the guide linei- , rf ir."-"npircant wanis-rrm.tr-,ing larger, r feer heshould say why ir should-r"--i"i6lr.
iiln"l'i3:;:; ;"i'::::. the rirst presentation wirhour the top rroor and
John Perkins: r favor the first presentation, but rrm not s're if rit without the 2nd. froor "r-""1. _r can approve of it verticalr_y, butknowledge of bus routes' etc, we donrt h";;;ii lhe pieces to nake aC"ilgr:. f agree with ;im and John, the orignal ptan is the rnostaesthetic and can be vrorked. ""!.: r can,t commit to a d.ecision, butstepping down'of the roof ".;;;'fess stark.the
Il
I
l
I
I
I
L
i
I!
Ii
'
f arzo:wit::outdecision
Roger Tilkemeier: r prefer the first to the second plan. rt is not asabrupt' we should "uit to s.e-wtr.r. Lhe bus routes come.
Gerry: r feel that the original .urba1 Design plan with a story added toit is my choice. until r" i""" wrrat i-s.,eea'ei rJi ro""es and ,ritLro-y",lre can,t make a decision.
;::irl;:rerd resuesred rhar rhe item be rabled unrit the ocrober 13
']ohn Perkins moved that the item be tabled until october 13 at the _-eguest:f i:;":":i':$ii"nlon"' tirr'"*"i"r seconded. rhe vote was unanimors, 7-a
4 : _ Cyrano's, applicationatrow an addition onto the for an Exterior Alteration and l.Iodification to
Jim Rubin presented the staff memorandum and the staff recommendationrvith t'he three condition. "=-"i"led in ttre memo. Jerry Greven of cyranors;1"If;:.oli":";::."*:H.;:";;" ii; Rubin,srated ir,.t it-*uu= non"onformins
'." si to "";;;;; resuireinen " """:^ +: i_!p:!!ru:::.: lil':i", nl" rlou
ed thr ta'positive one' Ile atlded tr,.tE" sLafi feJis*triaE rne patio in the backi.s a positive cont-.ribution sitr".--lt is on trre-soutrr, and that the area
-,vr-=- l,trt\ NItrG - nirp -rtNvrlrulNurttncnlt !L:\rt'.F r.t:r l!'"!
FROM: DItPn ltTl4l,NT OF Col.1j'lLtl't I'tY DDVril'Ol'|1uNT '/J Il1 RulslN
DATD: LO/9lao
RE:Revised Vill;.tge Center ProPosal
PJlg xl ltlg!!_ql- ]]E au IrqI
rhe r:evised \ii11ase Cc;lrer: proposal i"..r::x ::::llt.l:*t:? ::i"?,:r:i:posal'ff : Iil : i'? rXl',' i3" tXE'liT. "i; ":;;; ;"s " 2, e 0'0
- "s"3I: : :."-',.,::.::'j'i" :;li:r(rurr L L.-('r ' ew Pr.Po;al shov"sii""t is vihat bas changec' 'Ihe n-
:;#i*;; ""'.t;."i i,- i"t'"' ", n a :" 3 =
t^:.'?
- ":'^*":":51:ri53"';i'J! t,Il"riio-;q;;';-;eet.r^rhich i" t3'?l i*:?i
: ;::i'.:; ;"I i,'i:.i i "n i=iil i:'-i:I I 9'::*l;^ "*i.':i:::""aPdr Lrrt€rrL rrr vrrjs:e '- -- ta*oate. The plazawiniow that tbe new addition t'rrLl !.:^n -^i.'i\l"Iui;l;";'-;";;"= i" a similar conri suration to
what rt'as Presented in the First ProPosal'
A slrrveY has been done of ihe area
iocation of i-he buitdillg does learre'
a v;alkv.'ay.
space. The second
ut't SSO scluare feet
unit. the seconci
to Les Strer:ier's
is'to rePlace the
to the East of the
Theplan
We feel that
Urban Design
whj-ch deter:mined that Lhe picl''oseu'
""""gh rcoin for l--he bus l'::ne and
'
I
r
DEPARTYIEN r ltls-olJMlllll!\
I),-apa rt:ren-t Of ccnrinunity Develop:nelt',: l:ecoliil,ends aI'i)rova1 cf .i:he rer"ised
tith th" f of loiving concli tj'o;rs:
1. That a 20 1'ea:: reslriction be placed on l-he 850 sqtrar-e foot apartment'
2.Thattjreapplicant.isresponsiblefcrallimprovementsinttreplazato the East of the proiosed addition'
3.Thatthea'pplicantdeclicatethenecessar:ylandforihebuslaneandwalkttaY.
l.Thattheapplicai-rtagreeto.pariicipateinandnotremonstrat.eaga.insta special iniprovement dis+*ri;;;-r;-;;c v,,hen formed for vaj'1 Villag'e'
5.Thatthealrpl-icantagreetorvorkwiththeTovlnintherec]eveloprnent.ofthewalkwayalcngviilagecent.erBuildingDarrdpayforthose
improvenerrt "-ii-r".,
- aire"try - ben ef j-t h i s co:rrmerc i a I space -
in basrc conformance lsi'ch the VaiI Village
iionsltead Llrban Design Corrsicerations 'tl-re reviscd Plan is
Guide Pfan and Vai-I
John Perkins
Dan'Corcoran
. Ed Drager
RDger Tilkemerer
G:iinor Miller
JG uorgan
Jim RubinPeter Patten
BetsY Rosolack
The meeting \'tas called to order by Gerry-VJhite'- -Dan Corcoran moved the
minures or the s;;i-;;"ti"s-b" inn::Y?l: ::::i:"1,:Y":3 l:?i:'llt"lirr3l"l"i"?i";";r;;';;i'clv."i' Mirr". hadn'r arrived yet) .
2. Miskell gregnhouse addilion' Lot 2' Black 2' vail village l3th'
se6acE variance request
PeterPattenpresentedthestaff,sfeelingsaswritten'in.thememomailedto the commission, recornmending-aeniar. frhitt'r"y Miskell distributed more
information including a letLer t."*-tit. neighboi to the ea-st approving
the greenhouse. pin corcoran ili't-ii tooid be a positive addition to
a very p}ain-E":t sj-de ot -"r'" r'oo=.. _,:ot,'. Perkins iaid he was the original
desisner, .no -riHI;;[ ;; vrould Jri"i"-iiom the.vote, agreed rvith Dan'
Roger T. rnoved tnat [f'" vtti-"""I"-"pe:,",":9:..??: seconded it' The vote
was 3 in favor, 1(Gerry) against' G;tnor=Estained' since he did noi hear
the discussion.
!-
I
I
:
I
3.
Jim Rubin said a survey had been- completed- t9 =:t if the proposal
would interfere tiJt' tn" uus tan-ei""iJ*""pri+":9.the diffarences in this
proposal. He p"iri"a out the s conaitioni litt"d jl1 the rnemo that the
staff wanted t. =..-i^ptemented ii approval w19 granted'' He felt- that
the plan r.ras in ba=ic -conforman""'ri'tit itr. v.it vitt-g" urban Design Guide
plan and Vait Lionshead Urban o""igi-;"tr=ia"t"tions' ihe 2 smalrer "r-nits
that were reqested by the "t?II ir"ir,"-"r:-qj-n"r proposal vrere discussed'
Cecil Dodson, pr""iaLnt of Viffag; C""t".-C"ndominiumn Association' Bldgs
A,B & C questio."a-tpptoval of-tiice the square footage as proposed in
the urban oesien Guihl pr-"' Di;i";v;-:;ii::?,that the urban Desisn Guide
Pland.j.dnotdictateexactplans'bull'tasa-guideonly'Mr'Doclsonprot'estethe two stories, -urrt stated that'he appiovea-the improvement of the area'
John Perkins felt ihat the rnas=ing-h;i;;a :." *:\" the transition frorn' one
story to the present two story l"ifait'g' f4r.' 'Dodson asked if it was worked
wirhin the urban*n.=is" cuiqg pr;;:--a;rry lvhite replied that the UDGP
provided the guid-e.--ni"t added li'rrt.r"rr v;inston had reviewed tiri: ProPosal
-presentedthefirsttirne,butnotthe2ndone.JohnP.questioncdthe
landscaping of tn" -r". io the "Jril-""a if _the o-n"t= wduld work vith Jeff
ofi that. Fred Hiul"ra replied. h!-would, aclding that the lst plan had the
same footpr:inr, 1;;" ne tiiea t""pi;;;;'olhers-by changing the elevations'
In doing so, one owner had to exchange lr'is vier'r for additional space'
PRESEi.IT
_ Pec '-'2-- lo/ls,ruu '-
f'red ltibberar s statements on tlte 5 conditions were:
I. he washtt looking for a condo to market
2. he'd like to-co"ii-"ue to to' woix further with Jeff winston
3. the bus f-n" ao"t encroach o"io fit Property' but it and the walkway
work well anil he will dedicate the n-cessary land for them
4. agrees with this
5- agrees with this
EdDragerdidn'tagree-withhavingasecondstory'sincealstorywas
shown in the uDGp:'John perkirr"^3t"t"a-Lrrat_trre-design cannot be set
at the :sca1e of l,'=200' , nor square footage specif ied' Gayttor Miller f e1t
that in vorking iltr'-rt"a r"t t-i]1 ;;;th;f thlt this was a much better
design and that il ,oo"ra blend itt'i"iv t"ii' addinq that the Torvn needs
buses and walks ""a "
-o*pto*i"*'"rronia be made. iog"r T' added that the
locationwasveryvisibleandthatwhenthecommissionhadvisitedthesite that they n'ad agreed that-a Jn"--"t"iv-uuilding didn't look right
at that location. Gerry agreed u-id-.L"t"-a that he felt it was in keeping
with the UDGP.
Rogermovedforapprovalsubjecttothe5conditionsinthememo'Johnseconded- Vote u,is 4 in favor, 2 against. (Dan a Ed against) ' Jim abstaine
=irr"" he didn't hear the full discussion'-
Jim Rubin summed up the memo' stating. that the-staff rvas in favor of
approvat , fox tn.*f"!!E"J"=ilt"a-itt i.f-te memorandum' Ed Drager asked how
one could sa11 that there is no way one can keep people living in the
core area--did that rnean no one tlttt"a to live there? He felt it was
inconsistent with the prior "t"* iit'"re the tlif: is insisting that an aPart
go in to make =orr,*t-trirrg-ioor better because people will want to live there'
JimRubinfeltthattheapartmentswereintwodifferentlocations.This one is righl -.to"" irom 2 "iniil-"fG= wi-th more commotion at this
location.
JohnDobsonstatedthatBridgeStreetisaheavilytraveledareainVai]-uses of this type hawe been granted. rn the earry days, it 1aa9 sense'
but doesrr,t now to any where ,t.ui*tlr. a"gttt' Goisuch' the Bank building'
etc. have aone the saire thing. There are perhaps tvro lonq term spaces
in the core, and precedent has reen established. Long term has not
vrorked out. p.,, 'Cot"oran ' then adde6 that the Town is being
sued by a property owneiluno "or,!lali"a just the opposite, that his proper-
ty rvas guite val-uable, namely tfrl-i"r"r 6ver the Rucksack- They certainll'
wouldn't l'rant that conversaon' ie-ilated that he \ias on the Planning
Corrrnissionrvhenth""o'.,"rsioncame-throughrviththeapartmentsthatused to be above the Li-quor Store and he opposed that'
John Dobsor, ""Xna-if coniitionof t-to*t-*"to giit'tted to the Ore House Burlding'
the Cyrano bu:"rJing, ot for Gorsuch' Ile iepeated that the precedent
had been established and that long--i"t* 1oyling sirnply does not-work
out in that area-as i-t once did' He rcad the purpose of the CCI zone
district.
Jim Rubi-n reiterated one 'statemcnt that John D had made' that there
are no controls ln"l '-""fd require those units to be long term' John
A conditonar use Request for the_covqreq.griqge-gtore to.allow the
o- j- (=--_-
o
Who designs the: Plaza?
,ick: one of the conditions that trb. Hibberd has agreed to is that the design
of the plaza would be in conjunciion with the consultants for the Town, Gage
Davis,&Associates,andrttrintrrecanspeak.to.that.He|sheretonight,
but the planning Corunission tpifiii".iiy asked that question, and he said' "yes"
he would work with the Town as far as thatr s concerned'
Conditions from Tovn Council Meeting 10-21-80
Will he participate in the financial planning costs? You can ask hirn that
You can ask hiur that question.
Mr. Hibberd?
I assume that that would be Part of
be segregated out for the plaza itself or whatever
with resPect to design
.ich:
)ick:
rberd:
ton T.
Eskwith:
Dick:
!r ith l
Dudl ey :
Yes, if that can
is spent on that
yes.
Dick:
forn S.
Dick:
Ton
Dick
O.K. Is there a tirne limit on the conpletion on that? Is there anythj-ng
addressed as to when the plaza has to 6" .o*pr"t"d to satisfy this agreernent?
A11 these iterns that are listed u"""'ing aiong with the-approvaJ'..Should w9-
not address the fact that those things haie to-be acconpliihed within a reasonable
amount of time. rf construction is going to begin next, that there be a ti-ne
lirnit of 18 nonths or two years, whatev;;, for lhe conpletion of arl of these
agreed itens.
Thathasnotbeenplacedinhere,butlthinkthatIsanexcellentpointthat
should be added, Yes.
Where does he obtain parking for this 2900 square feet?
HewouldberesponsibleforpayingtheassessnentthatTownCouncilhassetuP
for Comrnercial tore I and Comnercial II as far as" '
At the current give away Price
That is correct, s i.r.
Are there any other questions? Do we need to take
is this just infornational?
No, you need to by notion aPprove the action' The
because there was a previous agreenent'
There may be someone frorn the public who will want to speak on this
Do we need to specifically amend this resolution No' 12 back j-n 1974' or"
IthinkthernotioncanjustsaythattheproPosalisapprovedandthattheCouncil
recognizes that it an arnendnent of that resolution'
Gentlernen, I suffer frorn a long nremory, and I have nany concerns' and this
happens to be one the projects, I guess the last project that Fred did, and hets
action on this tonite, or
reason that this came uP,
4.'/
n\
lvI
trtln n
?0
\.\
Mr. Fred Hibberd
774 Baseline Road
Irte eker, Colorado 8I641
Dear Fred:
Regarding the Village Center proposal' the
of the aPPloval:
SincereIY '
f/
--T / f.
,- tz- t /--'i.'r.-tv',.'DICK I{YAN
Con-,nunity Devel opment Director
DR:br
of communitY rJeveloPment
r6, 1981
ilr^'ing conditions uere Part
81657
t3
l. That a 20 yeat restriction be placed on the- 850 sqrrare foot apartnent'
-''=.....-
2- That the applicant is responsible-for al I impr-ovenents in the plaza
to tf," easi-of the proposed addition'
3. That the appli-cant dedicate the necessar/ land for the bus land and
ua 1 kuaY .
4. rhat the appl icant "q.:.s :".1:"i:tn;i:"J:,"?:J:: ;:l'i:ll"ii,i3lll"a sPecial imProvenent district' rt
5. That the applicant agree to uork with the Town in the redeveloprnent of
the r"alkuay along Village Center o'ii di''g D and pay for those intprovemcnts
ir,tt a:.t..i1y benefit his conmercial space'
In addition, at the Tor'rn Council rneeting' you agreed.:: !l'ttitipate in the
olanning cost if that part can be.segr"l^{ed oui of the public plaza cost'
ilso, Ron Todd stated ihat att Private itpl.outt"nts nust be comPleted two
vears f rorn aPProva I '
ili
Re: ViIIage Center
oo
is ViltaXr Ob^\w fo'tul
ifunAodrriurn \ss.
(821q.6 a.f+.
?0262- ?-"1.f{.
#o)1, A s1.f{.
JOl55. O . si.f+.
tqdst .7 q.f+.
,&gl3x,7s 24520.11
j5O)1.9x,Zt 1a61.46
"&(
fatb^
4&tuF
q.+t-
n.f+.
'l'o'u*. ta\rinl.
Or>O2.4 s1.Sl.
po4ta,G r1.Cl.
)zol4t,t tq'91.
16l+5.b tl.T+.
l11ol?.2 :1.$.
)zl4l.7 r .1 c
)z74g,a x .2 2
2?Oto4.t0 *1.f1.
o5t1.1e 1.GL
$ u,n* et,,*.rlbtel
hf
*-,'"rr^,r. Asw.
*l tr'aff*'
$l xw
,i
lliililr;ii
o
K
J09EPH EIERENBAUM
H, MICHAEL MILlER
.,OgEPH 9 BORUS
r. H, xatsER, P c.
HOWARD E.6ELT
CHAFILEg E LEDER
JAME9 L hIJRIZ-PHELAN
PEIEFI R. IOCIN9IEIN
EOWIN O. PERLMUITER
CHARLES A. BEWLEY
MAR9HALL O. AF|OOSXY
JAMES A..JACOESON
AMY IHERESE I.OPER
RO6EYN E.9HIRLEY
BERENBAUM & WEINSHIEN
ATTO RN EYS AT LAW
3773 CHERRY CREEK ORIVE NORTH
3U lTE',6AO
DENVER, COLORADO AO209
(303) 3AA -0600
H UBERT T. WErNSHr EN( ( r93r- r0g3)
MANDEL EERENIAUM, OF COUNSEL
vatL oFFtcE: (3o3) 476.O7O5
qURANGO OFFTC E:(303) ?47- r333
TELECOPTCR r3031 346-.O34
October 4, 1983
Mr. Peter Patton
Town of vail Planning Commission75 South Frontage RoadVai1, Colorado 81657
Dear Peter:
I am the attorney for Village Center Association.
The Association has consulted me in connection with the
proposed expansion of the commercial condominium project
directly to its north which is referred to in variousplanning staff notes as Village Center.
It is my understanding that Mr. Hibberd plans to
add to the existing commercial facility by expanding east
over what is now a small landscaped open area and north by
adding to the existing shops located on East Meadow Drive.It is also my understanding that at the last Planning
Environmental Corunission Meeting the matter \,vas tabled until
October IO, 1983. To date, you have already received alarge number of written objections from owners in Village
Center.
The Village center Association also objects to the
proposed expansion at the present time. The Association'sprincipal concern is that the expansion appears to have been
proposed without sufficient planning to accomodate the
needs of the Village Center owners and without sufficientplanning concerning the impact of the expansion on theVillage Center area.
The particular problems which the Associationbelieves should be addressed (and to its knowledge have not )are as follows:
1. Health and Safety. What impact will the
eastward expanffiability of the Vair Fire
Department to evacuate residents of Building A in the event
of an emergency?
Mr. Peter Patton
October 4, 1983
Page Two
2. Access Easement. How wiII the proposed East
addition affecE-:ffiFlFTffi-Eccess easement granted to the
Village Center Association? Mr. Hibberd apparently believes
he has the right to relocate this easement which is contrary
to my assessment.
3. Setbacks. WiIl the construction of the East
addition encroE3T@-n building set-back lines or violate
any proximity restrictions?
4. Lo@. How will the new
commercial spaffist side be serviced by
delivery and pick-up vehicles without further
inconveniencing and preventing condominium olttners from using
their parking space?
5. Density. How much commercial space can be
built? Has coffiiEtion been given in determining the
amount of commercial space which can be built to the number
of square feet of the garage from which commercial
businesses are being operated? What zone applies?
Ttre above sets forth a partial list of the
concerns which the Association believes should be addressed
before the proposed expansion is approved. The Association
does not object to the concept of expanding the commercial
space - indeed, in a number of significant areas, it
entirely endorses the concept. However, the Association is
concerned that this area of the town, which is in a
prominent portion of the town center, is not being planned
with the needs of the tourists. the town and the residents
in mind.
T'he Association believes tJ.at an imprudent and
hasty decision at this time could have a significant adverse
affect upon this area of the torrtn, and consequently request
that this matter be tabled further until such time as all
the relevant information can be obtained and evaluated.
Very truly yours,13_*?*
Barry Permut
BP:kb
cc: Cecil Dotson
Marta Cadmus
Ttot f-J{ .a2'- ,o,o'7t-.-& y' yUZ
Ef ue c0uhr rY AsCssoR / y'ze
DATE: 0e/24/83 PAGE:
C TlNDO},{ I N I Uf"{ L I ST I NG
C0DE: tlLTr CONDOMINIUM: VAIL coRE coND. (t{ .. t(olL Ce ,,'tu Bglrl\/'- ' t '/-===========
= = = = = = . = = - = = = = = = = : = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == =e1: :E = =rW 31= = = = = = = =
OOOl SCHESULE: a-l970q DISTRICT: 103
BARNES, I.IALLACE123 I,IAIN STREET
BR ISTOL
STATE; {:I Z IP CODE: 060lOUNIT 7
BK 0e73 PC 036ATAX ITEH9 |LLZ t2I7
OOOa SCHEBULE: O1O7l4 DISTRICT: 103
HARRINCTON, BANNIEZ BLYTON, BENJAT'IIN G. & BONNIE J.
5391 PARIS PIKE
LEX INCTAN
STATE: F.Y ZIP CODE: 4O511
UNIT 11
sK oa43 Pe 0670
TAX ITEH€: ttLZ I2L7
0OO3 SCHEDULE: OLO7?L DISTRICT: 103
HIGH FLYER, INC.Z RT]ATH & BREGA
17EO SBUTH EELLAIRE
DENVER
STATE: CO ZIP C0DE: SOeAaUNIT 12
Br4. 0244 PG OO42
Et4, o27€ PG O97S
TAX ITEHS:. tLt? t2I7
OOO4 SCHEDULE: OlO7OB DISTRICT: 1Og
JOSPEY, SHELDT]N
7. STEI,.IART, EEN3433 I,{EST ?18IH STREET
HATTIgOI'{
STATE: IL ZIP CODE: 60443
UNIT 6
EK O24e PC O94B
TAX ITEH9 1II2 121.7
OOOS .5CHESULE: O10713 DI$TRICT:1Os
KAET'II,{ER. JOHhI R. '.t JULIA D.
BOX 10a
VAIL
STATE: CO ZIP CODE: 8165€}
UNI T tt}
E!( 0274 PG 0340
TAX ITEI,{S: tll? l?17
,',,-*-i,/ -z'fi/ r /'7' ffi A /, (-
DATE: O?/24/83
EOr-E couNrY AsGssoR
CONDOI,{INIUM LISTING PAGE:
CODE: $171 CONDOIIINIUI"I: VAIL CURE CUND.
0006 9CHESULE: 010707 DISTRICT: lOg
KASHNER, JOSEPH &. CAROLE D.221 I,JEST TROPICAL I^JAY
PLANTATION
STATE: FL ZIP C0DE: 33317UNIT 5
BK 03C'8 PQ 4472TAX ITEl,l9: 7112 7217
OO07 SCHEDULE: AtOTeA DISTRICT: 103
LI]UTHAN. ROEERT B, & ANN 8.
B8X eo60
VAIL
STATE: CA ZIP C0DE: 81658UNIT 13
BK Oe4e PC 0680
TAX ITEH9: LILZ LALT
OOOE SCHEBULE: OtO7e3 DISTRICT: lOg
f'ICLEAN, LATJRENCE S. ry. AUDREY R.
5O1 SLATERS LANE, f'{ARINA TOWERS APT. 1OE3
ALEXANDR IASTATE: VA ZIP CODE: ?,2374
UNIT 14
EK 0246 PG 0596TAX ITE|49: 1Ll7 l?L7
OOO9 SCHEBULE: 01O7O4 DISTRICT: 103
NELSEN. JAN P.66I BERING BRIVE, *1O9
HOUSTON
STATE: TX ZIP CODE: 77057UNIT 4
BK 0311 PC O3EAsK 0344 PG 0114TAX ITEH9 lll2 l2l7
0OtO 9CHEDULE: 010703 DISTRICT: 103
PLIESSNIG, HEREERT J. & FRANCOISE B.315 HICKORY LANE
HADDT]NFIELD
STATE: NJ ZIP CUDE: 08033UNIT 3
BK Oa6e PG Oe14TAX ITEH9: 1112 L2l7
EDATE: B2/241A3
oOr E c 0 u N
CONDT]f'1 INI
fss0R
STING
PAGE:
CODE: *171 CONDOI"IINIUI"t: VAIL CORE CDND.
====== =.:: --:: =================================Ei===============================!i==
O0l1 SCHEDULE: A1O711 DISTRICT: l03
RFI"I INVEETHENT CO.1630 gDUTH COLSRADO EOULEVARD, SUITE 3O2
DENVER
STATE: C0 ZIP CODE: 8,0.222
UNIT E
BK 0307 Pe 0232
BK 0308 PG 0?36
BK 0349 PC 0618
BK 0350 PC Oa35sK 0350 PG Oe36TAX ITEM9: 1Ll2 I2L7
O01e SCHEDULE: QLO727 DISTRICT: lOg
sALI,IEN, LET]N H. JR. & JT]AN D.147 EUI{KER HILL DRIVE
ROCHESTER
STATE: NY ZIP CODE: 14625
UNIT 15
BK 0310 PG 0357
TAX ITEIIS Lt|? tZtT
OO13 SCHEDULE: 01O7OA DISTRICT: 103
SYRAN, SVEN I. & SIDSELZ VAIL HOf'{E RENTALS
BOX 2237
VAIL
STATE: C0 ZIP CODE: 816$S
UNIT 2
BK Oe69 PG O?13TAX ITEHS: t"112 L?L7
OO14 SCHEDULE: O1O701 DISTRICT: 103
l^fHITE, LIhIDA F. & JOHN E.
7OO HARBT]R NRIVE
KEY EISCAYNE
STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33149UNIT 1
BK 0336 PG 0906TAX ITEI49: tLl? LZLT
OO19 SCHEDULE: O1O712 DISTRICT: 103
ZAHRA, LAI'IRENCE A. & PATRICIA A.
25361 I}REENBROOKS DRIVE
ST]UTHFIELDS
STATE: l,{I ZIP C0DE: 48034
UNIT 9
BK 0301 PG 06e2
TAX ITEl,lS: 1lt2 L217
TY AS
UM LI
)^r
^D' Murrcy Finonciql Gorpororion
Jack E. Crozier
President
October 3, .|983
Town of Vail
Department of Cormunity Development
A. Peter Patten, Jr., Zoning AdministratorVail, Colorado 81657
Gent'lemen:
It is my understanding that the Town of Vail currently has before jt
a proposal by Fred Hjbberd regarding what is generally known as Building
D of Village Center.
The proposal is to add additional retail and commercial space to theexisting building at the expense of what'l ittle open space remains inthis project.
I would like to vo'ice my opposition to such proposed changes on twoprincipal grounds.
First, I know that the Council shares my concern over the never endingarray of proposals to increase the density in the core area by constantly
encroaching on what precious 'l ittle "green space" remains. The Town has
general ly done an excellent job by gettjng the most out of the few "vestpocket" planning areas that are available in the Town Center. Obviously,
proposa'l s such as this not only eliminate open spaces, but also directly
impact the need for additional park'ing, service areas and traffic neededto support more commercial development. As a developer myself, I haveto live with the "take some leave some" approach to land usage. The
current proposal takes all and'leaves nothing. Thjs is'in no one's bestinterest, particularly in a town where tourism and, therefore, v'isual
appeal , 'is jts most important 'industry. The specific location of
the green space in quest'ion is particular'ly important in view of thefact that it is directly in the line of vision when turning south offof the service road into the public parking faci'l ity.
Suite 600, 5520 LBJ Freeway
P.O. Box 809039, Dallas, Texas 75380-9039 214/g51-6640
Town of Vail
Page Two
Secondly, and just as jmportant, is the fact that existing storagefacilities located on the ground floor parking garage of Building
D seriously hampers and often comp'l etely blocks the ingress and
egress rights of those assigned parking pl aces on that level . The
retail establishments a1 ready in p1 ace have turned the back up
space for the condominium owners in Vi'l lage Center into a de1 ivery
tunnel for the retail establishments above. Frankly, I am surprised
that the Town of Vail has not 'l ong ago designated this area a fire
lane in view of the automobiles and general storage facilities for
flarnnable materials located on this level . Should a fire occur'
particularly at the east end of this ground f1 oor parking level'
the accessi-Uttity for fire fightjng equipment would be hampered
at best. To expand this area, it seems to me would be greatly
magnifying what is a'l ready a serious hazard.
For the above reasons, I am not only in favor of denying any further
expansion of Building D, but am a'l so in favor of the Fjre Marshal
designating the egress and ingress areas of the first f1 oor park'ing
structure as fire lanes and prohibiting the use of this area for
de1 ivery and service vehicles for the storage areas which currently
exist and for the retai'l and comrnercial establishments in the
floors above.
Thank you for your consideration.
Jack E. Crozier
Un'it 5G, Village Center
JEC: ml f
cc - Mr. Cecil Dotson, President
V'i1 1 age Center Association
P. 0. Box .|87
Vail, Colorado 81658
C. Rrcsmn Bnueaxrn
IAOO CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44II4
September 26, L983
Town of Vail
Department of Cornmunity Development
A. Peter Patten, Jr., Zoning Adninistrator
Vail, Colorado 8L657
Gentlemen:
0n behalf of Prima Investment Company, the
owner of Unit 6F - Building B in Village Center, I object
to the additi.on to Buil-ding D proposed by Fred llibberd.
My objection is based on my reluctance general-ly to have
an area lthi ch contains treesr grass and flowers converted
to bricks aod mortar. Secondly, my objection is based
on my reluctance to increase the density of comtercial
faciltties in the Vail Core area. I am i.nterested in
keeping Vail as undeveLoped in the future as possible.
Brubaker
CRB: cp
cc: Jomes D. Bonebrake
Lorin B. El-lison
Cecil P. Dotson
C. Richard
VILLAGE CENTER ASSOCIATION
P. O. llox 187 . VAIL, COLORADO 8165rl
September 6, 1983
Memo to: A11 Village Center Owncrs (Bui-ldings A, B, & C)
Each of you supposedly received a noticc frorn the Town of Vail
in early August regarding Fred llibberd's proposed changes
to Village Center Building D. Building D is where our parking
spaces are located. The notice said that a public hearing was
to be held on August 22 by the Planning & Environmental
Commission of the Town of Vail. T am writinq to tell you that
the hearing on Fred Hibberdrs application was postponed unLil
the September 26 nreeting of tl-re PJ-arlnirrg & Environnrental
Commission. I have recently reviewed the drawings of the
proposed alteration to Building D and 1 would like to share
with you how it would affect those of us wlto own a unit in
Village Center Association.
Between the North side of Building A and East Meadol Drive
there presently is a 30 to 45 f oot wicie l:rt-rdscaped area.
During the last l0 years the Village Center Association has
maintained this area, instalLed a sprinkler system, planted
trees, grass and flowers and built crib walls around the
sidewalk to control the snow melt. Fred Hibberd is proposing
to add two levels of retail and restaurant sPace where this
open landscaped area presently exists.
If anyone objects to this proposcd adclition to Village Center
Building D they should write a letter explaining why they
object' write to:
Towr-r of Vail
Department of Cornmuni.ty Development
A. Peter Patten, JL., Zoning Administrator
Vail. Colorado 81657
Several owners have already writtcn. lf yotr do write a letter
I would appreciate your sending a copy to trc: Cecil Dotson,
P0 BOX 187, Vail, C0 81658. In addiLion, i-l- anyone is in
Vail at the tirne of the meeting J. recomncrril yotr attend the' )t /'
r/ , /, /'' '!,<.i ' A- WZe- 'Cecil P. Dotson, President
Village Center Association
meeting.
I
e>
I
I
r-
t
o
a
o
a
l-^ ,Ltl 1, A^ ?.1- l^ ,/a , / e7
-r. /\ ..t 1 .i 1z .- .7
'1 ^ ^r Tl-\n t]
P!.rrF p
^
.r -F '.1?ri ?n rj-!t lir l'1 rt *^ .? Fn^q
" IL :1 -l .Ji
Tr: Fl-:c - l!:Is l-T-Tq': Is r0 D-lu::T
li.l -"^ 4etrLJn^ TIn" rrlrn:r')i! Tl.\., 6i'tt'\- I T"r
l_:t,nI:'i ?r'.t- ^l_lf s:1n-: In': a: ','nD;(rF' .r'-
rei: !t !l I ?:'ri-1i
li !a r"sT
rr-r |\r cn Y D v.' i.
T'i^ T .,atJ .Tril_t T!f r" rrr I-l_^ ^.
P]_l r'\rr,ja :aYvr..rn'.r rr,':Tl_ .":
. 1l:-!/ 1-!-'l_'' ''nlri^,
o
4A 'fft70J t/
o
t
I
t
o
I
o
I
o
I
o
t
R
:r?'r TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM MES$AGE. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL - FREE PHONE NUMBERS
Planning and Environmental Corrnission
August 22, 1983
PRESENT
Dan Corcoran
Diana Donovan
Duane Piperl,lill Trout
Jim Viele
PRESENT FOR MEETING ONLY
STAFF PRESENT
Dick Ryan
Peter Jamar
Jim Sayre
Larry Eskwith
Betsy Rosol ack
Jim Morgan
Gordon Pierce
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 pm by the chairman, Dan Corcoran.
l. Approval of minutes of meeting of July 25.
Viele moved and-Piper seconded to approve the minutes.
none against, with Donovan abstaining.
The vote was 4 in favor,
Corcoran stated for Item ll, exterior alteration tothe appl'icant had asked to table until September 26.to table Item 1l until September 26. The vote was 5-0 in favor.
Next, Corcoran stated that the applicant for Item #.|0, exterior alteration to
the l=jo4shead Arcade had requested to table until September .l2. Piper moved andffiaute uritil g/lz. The vote was b-o in favor.
ect
van seconded
2. Request for exterior alteration to the Gore Creek Plaza BrJildjng to enclose
Peter Jamar reviewed the memo, and explained that since the last proposal' the
applicant had revised the design of the patio and entry enclosures and had actually
separated the two parts of the-proposal by leaving the area in front of the entry
and to the west of the patio open creating more transparency. The entry area whichis current'ly open but recessed underneath-the Sweet Basil deck was to be enclosed.
The patio area also becomes enclosed with a greenhouse type structure, being transpar-
ent on all three sides. He added that since-the patio is void of any activity
during the winter months, the ability to use the area for dining during that time
of the year would improve the quality of the pedestrian experience by adding some
visual interest to the area, and the- patio would be open during the summer months.
He added that the staff reconrnended approval .
Rudi Fisher, architect for the project, stated that the enclosed entry improved
the sense of entry and increasei tne wiiting area. He added that the railroad
tie planter would be replaced with a stone planter.
Villaqe Center P
o
Q .,r.*-),.-ttg.ttttntTd
Lr')t'fr.//af tt.?t*aJ4A27 * 'tr*,;t3
Wtry
\11 W#o
:;fi..1-ntw*n*u|&, A-%r7:"'''1r.
,/u( -{r
e*l'
\l
Fh
v;r,t a t e tpt
sr9't/cl'
$,I
I
!atr- t
3r-%Ft{aAaa crta
Au- 6art,t aacc.c'
I;Vtort*r----"
Td U..L j,CI.^.UAIAAJ<
Enc',u€ee4 Ce'err PrcArE t
,, u'crtr.ard F P'. {Af i-"" a l'L '' r,'t. cL) P'-i:ri;
. t.-tG.,iAN ?. .ir-Y tEtt'-:n Yl{€ ,.l.A'"^ri ,'::' iqi
tH€ Lrf ?., fHa lr! ; D€6idt r..lir 'Ar"
T" ct'4s't"t'
cLao?-., Ail'JD C,ZtLtt.!.ra b <a^larY )a.le>, tl€ tft.ttr
5u!4,iArrlfar- c4t9t PLa Tto.rt oF 1.-e , fJ\;'tj'v€il €Alli '
Sarc or Cotnzloo 1..Cour.lrv 6r Lac ue J ''-'
?,rs sortaovo 0{ l3r$ cla?| Slca?- w^a
|.'6rt5"-b JC.:
wln{Etl l,lY H/ulD ^! D otFclll- *g'L
rrY. <zta.r{ r*,fort rxPrtgat r4A ac|. lr,lq?a
ryMEPtu "tdatlt'
.;., a)a rr<a '.t.(",ir.f Ita ' ' 'i
arf r) ; ' ,. r,r *( u A4t, JYA' 1Pr; 'a( I '
..:\: -- '- ' .,2 ,, _ua r,:{ . ra.,/ } '
, ta]! ,F.a- t " '
t7t75oF@t PA* Iu@qtf oF rrctt J
lh hrnt Erc)tzr at*)Ab,t ad$t@@t tlprtatfoifi4in '* tH 6.4q of btu t 72.^o
ttet( l3M
-eo.l. J. tltobg &
I{ca* *t
c*.4 .a.a.-ao at
/2 o o" l,'
ii
I
7'
f pnt'fxtcalf ad(Htl rt/,/z vtr#F*'rauv',rn? f bl a4 t'qL. t# { & *tt a'
ArIatL t; cd*oa? ere2airt dtt*tcfu *'ot f '*y^Yf* tr-y:T#*,*ffi,i:'ffiffi"ffi ';;;;-i;yrt7;;*'i-ry.2ft i.2.t:PI/-:.ry,tuffi F";Z'fr ,:ffi ;;;,;;;'Pt;*;!'Z?t:'F/E^Y::*3SH,**i'r:iriiii&Ti ;r;*;';;'i;v5i'"'"t4 attt q^k ptol a"7 e'z: ;q iv'b
a.erz r.1. conleit.t,tr * tn t p* q t Ff t' / M / ; ttu f t't777 p,p p o * lot Fd {,
'tu A'. D'.e'/t' tu'. .tdt-atd tl1t7tnl /&E & PaQilc** fuh', bJ a/ &tl i&r br#ttaq;;if#; #'I; Jt i i f'r*7i.u * " n* y-Y* ( :'#: m;: 2ff, ;ffi ;;;; i;; ;;;,,'ry a 4w'::nnrc""fl::H X";7T'r;"fr ."-r:;';;dfi;;;:;ftfi u-to/^eor**tfii;/b.d"r7nr)1:nbtrba;;fr;;b"'bt' ;;T* tu'*, /; A;r'a nrrut-ar pfat at'y d k*t t'' b "t *u'F*/f ryE"t
wt*t,g n* $*t!*qoot2t ett;ee *b.
augv1roQg Gttr/F/Al7E'
f.uw tU lb *q t'prytyd* tu;* Qn a-tu!1lra erdlM *tla'*tt*e't'bo;Ut#
5:q= orC'l-r'enoo
Cauriry o; Lgtta ]..
BZar"aO 3d 3r!.$6 al tr{ cEar(a oG -t 3 A-3aa A}aD t ti'G&" ':''-.(r\t{\ 4c
Z;.., ;;-9".; ; 6;:L7..-. '.t., ," ot-.- T '. "'!r L21-' . - -(.<..p r'o.r ^ruM6rr. Jail4L?-M49 (/u'r 'l-
1Ol Alt
turltc
rrrawaL
ll:45 am
2:00 pm
1l.
2.
3.
T0 BE TABLED 4.
10.
5.
PLANN]NG AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
September 26, .|983
Site Inspections
Public Hearing
Approva'l of minutes of September i2, 1983
Appointment of PEC member to DRB for October, November and December.
A request to amend the Vail Municipal Code to add a new zone districtentitled Ski Base/Recreation District. Also, a discussion concerningthe Golden Peak redevelopment proposal will take p1ace. Applicant:Vail Associates
Request for an exterior alteratjon to the Lionshead Arcade in order tobuild a commercial addition. Appl icant: Lazier Commercial Properties.
A request for an exterior alteration to the Village Center project at
122 East Meadow Drive to add a new retai'l addition on the east end, to ,/revise the entrance to Toymaker's Trail, to construct additions to theretajl shops, gnd,to constfuct a-.new sidewalk along the north side ofthe proieci. Applicant: Fred Hibberd
A request for aminor subdjvisjon to realign the lot line between lots27 and 28, Block A, Vail Das Schone, Filing No. l.
,App1 icants: Bi I I and Patti Anderson, Russel I Motta
Request for rezoning and resubdivision of Lot l, Block l, Bighorn First
Addition to change from one Two Family Residential to two Single Familylots. Applicants: James E. Sheahan and Rocky S. Christopher
Request for a GRFA variance and a variance from setback requirementsto build a greenhouse on a deck jn unit #2 of the Tyrolean Condominiumsat 400 East Meadow Drjve. Applicant: Stephanie Kennington
A request for a conditional use permit in Commercjal Oore II in orderto construct commercial storage units in the lower level of the concertHall Plaza. Appl icant: Eagle Val ley Investments, Inc.
A request to amend Section 18,24,065 Exterior Alterations or Modifications-Procedure to exempt small changes (defined as 100 square feet or less)in the review process that occurs only two times per year. The intentis to enable additions or deletions of enclosed floor-area of of .|00
sq ft or less to be reviewed at any time of the year. Applicant:Vail Associates, Inc.
Request for amendments to SDD 6 (Vai1 Village Inn) to increase GRFA
a1 1owab1e, modify permitted and conditjonal uses, request a parking
exemption' molify language concerning height restrictions, expand iommercialspace a1 lolable. Furthermore, a rezoning has been requested ior theexisting Amoco Station site to rezone from Heavy Service to public
Accommodations and to be jncluded jn the vail Village Inn sDD#6 District.
Appl icant: Piccidil ly Square, Inc. .
6.
7.
U.
9.
tt
MEMORANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Commission
FR0M: Community Development Department
DATE: September 22, 1983
SUBJECT: Request for Exterior Alteration and Modification for the villagecenter complex to remodel the north side pedestrian walk, remodelthe entry to Toymaker's Trail and add a commercial addition to thenortheast corner of the property. Applicant: Fred Hibberd
The staff recommends tabling of this item unti't 0ctober lo, l9g3 due to thelateness of the submittal of the revisions to the staff which did not allowadequate review time.
If the PEC wishes to take a vote, we would recommend denial due to the lackof sol utjon to the existing loading problem occurring on the site.
hwn r
TO
FROM
RE
DATE
utl
42 welt meadow drlve
vall. colorado 81657
(303) {76-2200
MEMO
Peter Patten
Mike McGee
Village Center Improvements
20Ju1y 83
tlre departmenl
After revi-ewing the proposal- and visiting the site for the
proposed Village Center Improvements , the Fire Department
makes the f ol-1owi-nq observations :
1. The architect for the last "improvement", BilI Pierce,
stated to me durring the approval stage and plan review,
that the new construction would be sprinkled. When the Fire
Department inspected the site, we found that the sprink.Iers
had been deleted. In add:-ti-on, the fire alarm system required
and approved for the last phase, was never installed as per
the plans. The installing electrician took several weeks to
complete the work and pass inspection, after the TCO was
granted. Subsequently, any future construction at that
location will be carefully evaluated, tested and inspected.
2. The parking garage beneath Building D are required to
be sprinklered and were in fact, required at the time
of the last construction. The plan chec)< by the Build-
ing Department did not catch this fact due to the faj-l-ure
of the archj-tect to indicate the exj-sting details. Such
parking structures will need to be sprinklered before the
Fire Department will grant any future construction.
The distance between the new construction and the existing
t02 uoat meadow drlue
Y!ll, cllorado 81657
(303) {76-2100
llre deparlmenl
-2-
building should, or rather, must be no less than 20 feet.
With the elevation of the existing buildi-ng and the total
lack of fire department access, the 20 foot seperation i-s
needed to allow us to place a ladder against the side of
the building and operate under fire conditions.
The relocation of the gas meters will need to be
addressed. Gas meters shoufd be located i.n such a
way to facilitate ready access and distinguishment.
5. whereas the retro fire alarm ordinance applies only
to existing structures, a full fire alarm system will
be required. In addition, due to the increased fire loading
and proximity of buildings, limited access and water for
fire fighting, we recommend that the required fire alarm
systems be installed in the other buildings as wel1, as
part of,or durring, the construction process. We feel this
is necessary due to the potential for fire spread from one
structure to another.
We would des j.re a ful1 set of plans to review at our officerts
meeting.
NAMES AT.ID ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY
FOR PROPERTY ADJACEM TO TIIE
V[],LAGE CENTER SHOPS
(1) Village Center Shops - nVtllage CentJr Alt .*-cr CollO. l\:saC-,
sox # l3a
Vail-, CO 81658
(2) Crossroads Shopping Center
Crossroads Ll-nit ed
Box 11
Va1l, C0 81658
(3) Transportation Center
Town of Vall
Rn- I On
Vail-, CO 81658
(4) Open Space,/Green Belt
Va11 Associates
Box 7Vail, CO 81658
t],i'.orr,t 4, --
Jri.t s srt[
/ /'3 6 /tto-' / ln
(5) Sonnenal-p
c/o KarlheLnz Faessl"er
242 E. Meadow DriveVall, CO 81657
(6) Klandra Lodge/Ta11s."D ,4 i-+ra-I5'66id'; nv c.-,,t t': ",3ox--tl#€
- l,raaLar , Co 8 l€*t
Vail Associates@2fildrr-Runt
'd.L
a
VaLl-, C0 8165V
f! o'" 7
/664
Qt
J
tr1I"
/t \i),-^ j .,,
,,./.
n R i\t , i' -l r/l(vv
.. / ,7 r-
,U ./ l7 /--"/')
G, "( a-L i' ry
?/t-'/r3
al-
dd{-
/' - I(t-e -4 Doy' t u Tpno
rc (3o* #
1tr1
LG L""[l''t1 '?''
t,\*"11, lrs > '7f/x3 r
|,' .)'--.- -)-; '/Lar "a t '! ,-,/
L).-,4-hn'^ S{7Jt
or
13€> :>te" UAt'/
/r'/t./ 3-/f ) ,t-.. I ra u )/t /Y
''-,/" - , 3 r t3it4/
al-( cn "Lu .,- s Lf, o.1\i{l , ,i
D*,< 7. "-/
2t t3,-{ 33to
V^'-t
^
--/l-e t, Yr-'" t
L ,^.J- j l-
v.v tro L6 /
V]LLAGE CENTER RETAIL SHOPS
(INDIVIDUALLY OWNED)
O B/83
LA TOUR RESTAURANT
Marie and l,lalter Moritz
Box l4l
Vai I
KI DSPORTS
Paul Treacy
c/o Kidsports
122 East Meadow Dr
CLASSIC DESIGN
L.D. MARKESON
Bo)( 1305
Vai I
CHARLIE'S T SHIRTS
Charl ie Stone
Box 1392
Vai I
EYE PIECES
Daniel Barry
c/o Eye Pieces
122 East Meadow Dr
Vai I
FOREIGI.I CONNECTION
Thomas Rau
Box 1186
Eagle, Co 8.|63.|
PIZZA AND PANE'
David Gambretta
c/o Pizza and Pane
I22 East lv|eadow Dr
Vail
THE VAIL GALLERY
David Blankenship
c/o the Vai 1 Gal'lery
122 East Meadow Dr.
FINISHING TOUCH
Jim and Ruthie Wilson
Box 85
Vai I
CIMA
JaER nicrs
c/o CIM
122 East Meadow Dr.
tail Sho to add a new retail addition on the eastto rev se t entrance-to-TIE tovmaker' s Trail sho
'.-'-lg!er Patten stated that the applicant, Fred Hibberd, asked to tab'l e this untilAugijSt 22- Pierce moved and Piper seconded to table. The vote.was 6-0 in favor.
-o
Center Re
T' -4- 7 /2s/83 a
D.
. Dick Ryan showed a site plan exp'lain'ing that only part of the plan was theproposal. He reviewed the impacts under the urban Desiqn Guidb plan andConsiderations and explained that the applicant would hive to pay the appf icableparking fee, and that one condition of approval was that the aipi'icant igreeto participate in and not remonstrate against a special improvement distiictif one was formed for the Vi'l lage area.
Jay Peterson.,.representing Lodge properties" Inc., stated that only the alterationof the Salt Lick bar would be done nbw, with the rest done next seison. Headded that the TOv wants pedestrians to come from Founder's p1aza, and jt wasthe intention of the Lodge to tie their plaza to the Founder's pliza.
The board,_upon polling was generally'i n favor of the project. Trout questionedthe removal of outdoor dining space, since the board had denied other projectswhich included this type of removal. Peterson said that they would coinmiithat they would replace any outdoor dining, that it was to t-he theiapplicant'sadvantage to have outdoor dining in that irea. Trsut then asked whal'the nextphase-of the Lodge was going to-be, and peterson showed on the site plan theaddition to the International Room which would probably not be preseirted untilSeptember. Trout asked how the outdoor dining would bi handled'if the InternationalRoom.expansion was not approved, and Peterson replied that the outdoor din'ingwould simply move outward'from the building. Ti'out suggested that one conditionof approval be that an egual amount of squire footage oi-outdoor dining berepl aced.
Jlout moyed and Piper secolde4 .to. apqrgye lhe Lodge expansion per the staffrecommendation and memo and
oa Dut rolnq perm'lt for the Arlberg resta
A one exi st inq.
at Vail:to expand and remodel two restaurants.
Pgtgr Patten !uogested qhangjnq_-L!ris to state: Before a temporar.y cert.ifjcateot ogcypanc.y is issued for the Arlperq reFtaurahf,@gguar Iq or greatef Lhan_the existirlg gne, must be in place. Trout revisednls motton as per Patten's recommendation.-
6. Request for an amendment !o Section 17.26.060 Condominium Conversions to delete
I af quagg_ wh i ch wou'ld requ i iC' mgtgrs for egch un,'it' =and to delete languaqe that would FequireJhA-p;tmdTgt_Iqqs equal.to_the fees gharqed if the buildinq were new, minus previous
bui lding permit fees. Appl icant: Town of Vail
Peter Patten reminded the
moved and Trout seconded
they had asked
the amendment.
for this amendment. Viele
The vote was 6-0 in' favor.
board thatto approve
The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 pm.
4vb
PLANNING AND ENVI RONMENTAL COMMISSiON
August 22, 1983
l2:00 pm Site Visits
2:00 pm Public Hearinq
l. Approval of minutes of meeting of July 25.
2. Request for exterjo.r alteration to the Gore Creek Plaza Building to enclose
the deck of Blu's Beanery. Applicant: Charles Rosenquist
3. Request for a conditional use permit in Special Deve'lopment Distrjct #4,
Cascade Village in order to construct a ski trail connecting Simba skr'trail below the l.ower face to Cascade Vil lage. Appl'icant: Andy Norris
4. Request for an amendment to Sections .|8.04.030, 18.22,090, and .l8.24.130
in order to remove accommodation units from density controls in the Commercial' Core I and the Public Accommodations zone districts. Applicant: Lodgc
Properties, Inc.
5. Request for a density control variance to Section 18.64.050 (B) in orderto remodel and add 91 sgudre feet of GRFA to the interior space of unit
#306, Vorlaufer Condominiums at 385 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Ed Wasson
'6. Request foraconditional use permit in order to construct an enclosed
swjnming pool at 758 Potato Patch Drive. Appl'icant: Gary Bossow
7. Request for a rear setback variance and for a stream setback variance jn
order to enlarge a deck on units 4A and 48 of the Texas Townhouses,483
Gore Creek Drive. Applicants: .H. Thomas and Delores B. Coghill
8. Request for the modification of a conditional use permit in order to expand
the playground to accommodate a sodded soccer field at the VaiI Mountain
School at 3.l60 Katsos Ranch Road. Applicant: Vail Mountain School , Inc.
9. Request for a m'inor subdivision to vacate a lot line between lots 25 and
26, Bighorn Terrace Subdivision. Applicant: Ted P. Stockmar
lO. Request for exterior alteration to the Lionshead Arcade located at 483
East Lionshead Mall in order to build a commercial addition in the interior
corner.fac'i ng northeast. Appl icant: Lazier Commercial Properties.
1.|. Request for an exterjor alteration to the Village Center Project at 122
East Meadow Dri ve to add a new retail addjtion on the east end, to rev'i se
the entrance to Toymaker's Trail, to construct additions to the retail
shops, and to construct a new sidewalk along the north side of the project.
Appl icant: Fred Hi bberd
Fned L. Ahenn
756 South Third Street ,/ Post Office Box 50099 / Jacksonville Beach. Florida 32250 / (904) 247-4355
11 August 1983
Peter Patton, Jr., Zoning Administrator
Town of VailDepartment of Community Developmentvail, co 81658
Dear llr. Patton:
Thie ie to advise that I am an owner in Village Center' BuildingB, Unit 2-8.
I would like to protest the addition proposed at the east end of
122 East Meadow Drive to add a new retail facility.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
S i ncerel y,
Fred L. Ahern
FLA/jcd
INVESTOR ,/ REALTOR / DEVELOPER
a
t
comnroo elen.rcnts, and such intcrest thcrein shall not be transfcrablcvcyancc of a condonriniurn unit. A conveyance of a condontiniun.r unit
cxc ept with a con-
$hall transfer tothe grantee ownership of the grantorrs bcneficial inl.erest in all such propcrty lnterestsassociated with thc foreclosed condonriniun.. unit.
.-3L Easenrent for Access lo Condominium Units.
Each condominiurn unit shall have access to a public strcct by an carcrnent or cascnrr.ntslo be dcscribcd or otherwise depicted on thc Condonriniurn lrt a p. @glg|ISSe !,u cs_Lbcrigt,t to relocate and.'acate such_easements frorn time to time, du iiFiie d eveloif ii-
_anq coostructron pellrod; provided, ho\\ever, that ea(h c()ndorninium shall alw.r1.s
"r".naffi?::=-7::-------r- --.%ano lrotTl a Dublrc strect-
32. Reservation to Enlargc and Supplemcnt Condonriniun.r project.
(a) Declarant expressly reserves the right to enlarge this condorniniurn project bysubmitting thereto Parts or aIl of the adjoining real property describcd in Exhibit "Cr',u'hich by this reference is rnade a part hercof, which adjoining property is depicted onth: Map. !":h:.99:ji"g1s to this coodon.rinium project shall be expressed in and byduly recorded Supple:rrent(s) to this Declaration and Supplement(s) to the Map.
(b) Declarant reserves the right to enlarge this project ln pl.rrase)by the constiuc-tion of additional condominiun-r units, both residential and comrnercia-l/- During the periodsof such additional construction and developnent, any disturbanceior prevention of use ofthe general or lirnited corrrn.r on elements shall be kept at a rninirnum; proviaed, however,that the construction of impror.ements shall not be impeded.
(c) Annexed hereto as Exhibit !'|D" is a proposed pran of Deweloprnent of that pr:op-erty or.^'ned by the Declarant, which property is described on the annexed Exhibit "C',.Ex-ribi t "D" sets forth the proposed or approximate building locations and other inforrnationrelating to the enlatgernent of this condorniniurn project, but the sar-ne is not intended, norshall it be construed to be a definitive, specific plan frorn which the Declaranr rnay notdeviate. The exact distances b€tween buildings, the height of each building or structure,the exact location of each building or structure and the nurnber of condorninlum unitsthereon are reserwed for deterrnination by the Declarant. Each contract purchaser andgrantee of a condorninium unit shall be deerned to accept the provisions hereof includingvariances therefrorn by Declarant and any variance(s) from such proposed pran ofDevelopment requested by Decrarant from the Town bf VaiI; provided, however, thatDeclarant agrees to conforrn reasonably and substantially to the Proposed plan of Devel-oPment within the orowisions hereof which allow Declarant reasonable flexibility relativeto building locations, heigbts, distances between buildings and nurnber o{ condominiurnunits.
(d) During the Period of enlargemeot of this condorniniurn project, Declarant shal-lprovide automobile parking area(s) for use by the condorniniurn unit owners on a portlonof the ProPerty described in Exhibit "c". Declarant ,'ay select the actual Iocation(s) ofsuch area(s) on which such autornobiles may be par].ed and regulate paths of ingressthereto and egress therefrorn. Subseguent to the construction of ail of the condorniniurnunits, Declarant' at his expense' shall construct a rnulti-level parking structure on aportion of the property described in Exhibit "c". upon completion orihe parking struc-ture, the Declarant shall then assign (convey) one parking space therein to the then own-er(s) of each residential condorninium unit, such parking space shall be a limited com-rnon element appurtenant to that condominium unit. During the construction of the park-ing structure, the temporary prewention of use of a parking space or facility on the projectshall not be grounds for any ciwil action or damages r.elative thereto. No funds shall beescro'a'ed by Decrarant or reserved or withherd by a purchaser of a condominium unit dur_ing the period that the Sarage structure rernains unconstructed. The rernaining uoassignedparking spaces shall be owned by Declarant and rnay be rented or sold by Declarant at acircumstantial varue as deternrined by Declarant to any per-son or- entity. Expenses andcosts ofmaiotenance, oPeration, repair, real estate taxes and assessments on land andimprovements and insurance and other direct or indirect costs and erpenses incident to ..
IN
day of
Paragraph titles are for convcnience of
or change the meaning of the contente of
WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has duly
October, I !?2.
rcference and are not intcnded to lirnit.
thc various paragraPhs.
executed this Declaration this 3lst
fol.l ow-ing described
One to and from
STATE OF COLORADO ) ""City and County of Denver)
The loregoing jnstruincnt was ackrou.Iedged before me thisJlst day of October,
I)72, by Fred Hibberd, Jr.
lYitress rny band and official seal. My Commissjon expires August 5, 197.1.
Chris J.
EXHIBIT "AII
A part of Tlact C aod of Lot K, Block 5-E, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail,
Couniy of Eagte, State of Colo!ado, described as:
Parcel One. Comrnencing at a Point in said Tract C Ir orn whence the Northwest
. ot n!i-JT6iI] Block 5-B bears S 3?'15'50" w, 19.44 feet: thence N 64"42'55" w, 32.00
feet: tbence S 89"17'0+" W, 1I7.00 Ieet; thence S 86'f?'04" W, 115'00 Ieet to the true
point ofbeginning; thence S 8"5?'37" E, I4.68 feeti thence S 7l'53'00" W, 69.55 feet:
thence N 8"5?'37" W, 96.05 feet: thence N 80'02'23" E, 68.55 feet; thence
E, ?0. 30 feet to tbe true Point of beginning.
, .rt Parcel Two. A noo-exclusive easernerlt olr, over and across thev p.t.J7or ptripi-. es of ingress to Parce.l One and egress frorn Parcel
the public street, tol wit;
Beginning at the said true point of begiuing as described in ParceI One; thence N
8'5?'3?"W, 70.30 feet to the point of beginning of said ParceI Two: thence S 80"02'23"
W, 15.00 feet; thence N 8"5?'37" W, ?4.29 feet to a point on the arc ofa 145.7? foot
radius curve whose central angle is 9"29'30" and rvhose center bears N 48"51'05rr E'
145-'17 leet: thence Southeasterly 24.15 feet along the arc of said curve to the left, the
long chord of which is S 45"00'58" E, ?4, l4.feet;.tbence S 8".57:3?ll E, 55..4Q.feqt to the
point of beginning.
Declarant reserves the right to grant other owrers of condominium units located on
property described in Exhibit "C" a sirnilar easement for ingress and egress. Declar-
aJtt further rese-ves the exctusive and sole risht to !,'a cate said easement from time to
time durine the development of this condominium Droiect and to te the n:ean
ress and egress frorn the Pu c str eet.
I{i bbc rd '
-16- j rj
r{AILGRA M SEAVICS CENTEPrll DDLElnt,tN, VA. ?o 6A523P4t
a 4-020926 B?35-003 0R/23 /?3 ICS S0TSC? trLTN GLkrB
SUSPECTED DUPLI CATE: 4-0501 FF S235 ICS IP mNCZ CSP408998733.3 MGtt| TDFr'l SAi, JOSE CA l4q 0P-23 0453 P FST
a
I
A PETER PATTO^I JR, 7ON I NG A DI{I N ISTRA TORo ff'll 35 IlJh o
o
T
I
t
o
o
t
I
o
l>
a
F
o
o
a
DEAR FIR PATTON
I AM AN OUINER IN BUILDI{G B, VILLAGE CENTEP, VAIL COLNC^DO ^AID ^PARTTINE RESIDEiIT Otr VAIL. TFIS LETTEP IS WPITTFN II{ FqSPON'SE TO A^I
APPLICATION BEtrORE IHE CITY Otr VAIL, TO trt.RTHE? trXPA^ID trUILDIIIN D INfiE VILTA GE CEiITER, THEREBY, REDUCI NG THE . . I-I 'f ITqD. . trXI STI N6 OPE^'9 ACE
lHE 0RIGIt\tAL PLA|\IS FoR VILLAGE CETtTF"R IiTCLUDqD a^l 0PFN SP^CF'
LAiIDSCAPED A-PEA l^tHICH TWO vEARS AG0 '.'raS C0Mpp0MISED a\!D T^Ktrr! ^"r^YBT T}IE FIqST EXPANSION BUILDING D. A \',' FLIRTHEC qi]CtrN^CHi,!tr\IT I.INLILN
SEEiJ LUDICROUS.
CII{AT IS fiE VALLIE OF CILII\G OFIGINAL PLAI,IS A I!f) LAYNUTS Ttr ^T A I-^TFP
TIfqE THEY CA N BE C0ltlPLETELv ABAND0Tt|ED [rND 0Vr" atllLT? t/rtr l'rtroF: tlr\rDEa
1!{E IMPRESSION T1{AT OPEN SPACE AryN LA NNSCAPTNG I'IAS ^ PIPT Ntr THq
VILLAGE CENTEp PRO.IECT: D0 NOT TAKE ANY MnRE Otr IT An'Av.
SINCERELY
t
a
I
I
I
@Fir
sa
ALLE^I T GI LLILAND
"t0l EsT
t{_:!!c0 ilP ilGr'l
o
TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM, SEE FEVERSE SIOE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL . FREE PHONE NUMBERS
////fe-/-'
w u^a /*
fo+",-,"fu(-fu /*"/
hJ s/7 ,ry%4' /^nH L{"*/ t1.
'^*# /r'.Zrro;- urd h/'- phel 4--)
4"/-r^(brl7
-- Z.-" z4z1 A/ ,'"'t//z/- y'fux. fu {Lz/22t4
'X" k &-- zZ"^ ,*%"L*1o?T /-uzfro? / /
t
'fu ratrl"
7*, /arilsraz(
/A fiu,ctrrrf
I S*zre-z-
V'q€r
5o7 - 733 -BZ7
fuiD td frqt ./
o
1/*
'iz
t/IIiVt
- >rLd#**&.nZ/
u
/ <a.z14 -"r*1 c*t97e**
/ /r**L", X?vZ'+ it rl"r"(- gat c,L,.L ,A*;."*r-:l/*/-,"/ue( z('/r. p*tfu/an"d-tkh'/a,-ry *::4.Y,, z,
t./Maz-
f tU-.'*/f"-L*"+L
o
- a/ezz" /=Z;* ,lzuz rt ,..r-./f &f.., *'-( rh ;'1 *-^/ dLu*,yo
fr4 r"{"*trr*( *"87,oo A
- L*-/r?r./UL
- h*r'/ /,-- /,-/- ry axz-
BALDWIN ASSOCTATES ARCEITECTS, INC.
1000 souTH FRoNTAGE RoAD, WEST
vArL, CoLoPADO 81657
(303) 47 6-4433
10 June 1983
SIEJECT: Village Center Improvements
Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan
Sub-Area - East Meadow Drl-ve.
Thls Jmprovement plan in conjunctlon roith the UDGP Ltem 22 proposes to
malntain the exlstlng roof-top park/focal polnt over the existing parking
garage. The alteratlons indlcate the removal of the exlsting borderLng
planter to alLow for the creatlon of a new small com-ercial addit ion to the
east of the park space, which will add to the use of the park by drawJ-ng
people lnto t.he area and enhance the t'focus" by addlng a third slde lirnit
to the park. The benches, llghting and planters addressed in UDGP item
22 both exlst and wilL be irnproved upon ln this proposal. A new deck area
ls proposed as an extension of the park space and should increase the near
vLsual Lnterest and aid ln drawlng pedestrians into the park via a "keyhole"
view effect. The proposed structure ls planned to natch the lover roofl-ines
of the most recent Village Center addltlon and should not have a negative
effect on the view of the mountain !o the south but shoul-d create a more
I-nteresting foreground to that vLew and a stronger visual- rtermlnationr
to the Village Center Property. This park area may even warrant some
conslderatlon for an east bound bus stop locatLon Ln lieu of either the
Crossroads stop or the Vii-lage fountain stop. The Crossroads stop seens
extremely congested and somet imes dangerous when both east and west
bound busses are in the area,
Sincerely:
,€d.84^
Richard S. Yaldwtn
RSB/kp
O
BALDT{IN ASSOCIATES ARCTTITECTS, INC.
1000 sotmt FKlt{TAcE RoAD, I{EST
vArL, coIoRADo 81657
(303) 47634433
9 June 1983
IIILI,AGB CENTER SITB COVERAGE
Bxlet lng lot Area
E*letlng SLte Coverage
Propoeed Addlttonal Site Coverage
Total Proposed.
Allowable SLte Coverage 63382.36
27853.0 - 44367.65 --- ok.
63382. 36
26s44.0
ft.ft.
r.70=
r309 .0
27853.0 ft.
44367.652 Bq. ft.
/ /eanzrya/'7rffi-zr'/ y/t47
/"- rzozr/e
1, 1F@ /'tf€ft€td?q
) zss- 73a7
ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION
l, RODNEY E. SLIFER , llayor of the Town of
Vai'l , A Co'lorado Municipal Corporation, and on behalf of the Town
of Vail pursuant to the authority vested in me by the resolution
du'ly adopted by the Town Counci'l of the Town of vai'l on the 1st
day of December , 19 81 , do hereby accept the above and
foregoing dedication for the uses and upon the following terms and
conditions:
IN l,tITNESS l,lHERE0F, thi s instrument has been executed this
Theforego.ingAcceptanceofDedjcationwasacknow.|edgedbefore
meth;s lat davor Az-at-"hzl- 'n0/'av
Poltletl e ' \U{d. as Mavor of the Town or vail
I
I.IITNESS my hand and official seal.
' /re't- day of t\e et-'J^rt* , Ls-t/-.
(sEAL)
ATTEST:
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
)) ss
)
TOWN OF VAIL
My comm'ission exPires, d"il /qr.
DEDICATION
KNOII ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT FRED HIBBERD, JR. is the owner of a certain parcel of land
more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein and does hereby dedicate to the Town of Vail ,
a Colorado Municipal Corpora.tion, for public street purposes, said
parcel of 1and, as built and existing, and FRED HIBBERD, JR. does
bereby convey, release, se11 and quit claim all of his right, tit1e,
interest in sai.d property free and clear together will all appurtenants
and privileges, free and clear of any estate, claim, title or interest
whatsoever of FRED HIBBERD, JR., his successors and assigns, to be
used by the Town of Vail for pub11c street purposes only.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said FRED HIBBERD, JR. has caused his name
to be hereunto subscribed and attested this 1st day of December, 1981 .
Attest:
STATE OF COLORADO
COIJNTY OF EAGLE
TIIE FoRECoING INsTRUMENT tryAs ACKNoIYLEDGED BEFoRE ME THIS IO*
\ss.
DAY oF T0 r , LsJl By F&€b LptBBEt<tr AND
Witness my hand and official seal .
FRED HIBBERD. :IR.
My commission expires : f/cZ--Z"O St
. RESOLUTION #35(Series of 1981)
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION FROM
FRED HIBBEND, JR., A PART OF VILLAGE CENTER,
TO1fN OF VAII, COLORADO; AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO.
WHEREAS, Fred Hibberd, Jr. has dedicated a certain parcel of land
to be used as a public roadway; and
I{HEREAS, a certified legal description of the parcel of land
has been prepared and submitted with the dedi.cation, which is
incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail wishes to accept
the dedication for the public health, safety and welfare;
NOVf, THEREFORE, BE rT ORDATNED BY THE TOWN COINCTL OF THE TOWN
oF VAIL, COLORADO:
It is hereby known that the dedicati.on of such property as
evidenced on the attached Exhibit A ancl incorporated herein by
reference, being duly executed by Fred Hibberd, Jr., b€ accepted.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS
-JeX
dav of
i\-e-eo-",r.An-', 1981.
ATTEST:
LEC*L DESCRMION
A part of Village Center, Tcn+n of Vail, Colorado, tte roap of t*tich is
recorded in the office of the Eagle Courry, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder in
Bnok 226 at Page 624, said part bei-ng described as follornm:
Begirrrirg at a poinc of tangercy on the southerly
rig,ht-of-way of EasE I'feadcrht Drive, r,iLrence the south-
eait cornerof said Village Center bears S 39o05'34" E
231 .79 feet distant; thence easterly 32.84 feet along the
arc of a curve to the riglrt having a radius of 35.50feet, a central angle of 53"00'00" and a drord vilridt
be-ars S J5o02'35" E 31 .68 feet; thence 80.80 feet along
the arc of a curve to the lefc having a radius of 77.00
feet, a central angle of 60'07'37", and a ctrord vftr-ich
bears S 78'36'24" E 77.15 feec Eo the right-of-way of
East Meadow Drive; thence the follo^ring three courses
along said rigfrt-of-way: (1) northerly 4.23 feet
along tJ:e arc of a curve to the right havirg a radiusof 145.77 feeE, a central angle of 01o39'43", and a
drord r,*rich bears N 37o10'44" W 4.23 feett (2) 79.77
feet along the arc of a cura/e to tlre left hawirg a
radius of 69.58 feet, a csrtral angle of 65"\L'42" and
a chord rfiich bears N 68o56'44" W 74.97 feeL; (3) S
78"2J'25" W 34.41 feeE to the point of begirmirg, containing
1,940 sqr:are feet or 0.044 acres, IIDre or less.
Colorado L. S. 16844 J"
1t ) ,,,.
,,.\'tilt r.1..r" ,, r)'
rF":|
$ $$htllQ -r!
tr It:
fi.J
I<l
\l
s
ir
t.sa
EUo!
{Eer.t sIrtr6o.y ..sJ!
isEbEH6it
Fr .tr
6TJID> q*rS;c oil.qst- rJ r.r
I*eF...!oog
&3 -aYl-"
.-.1 l.-{ \O9ot
Ess! Car
G
:TStr?.*xxEd
*6(J
ss
t
FBo
b
c
,tbs
H5)ll{
8b
frs&5=l
\\(DtFU)
t-(J)
,K"
F
E
uq
-J9oJi:8L|,{
\J
l-tI
oh- l" ]y"A
a , 1C4
'l'lrai; ,rcr;oi'ci iitg i:o lltrl inLl ic;ir:i t)l' [,lrir (]tttttti.,\' I{rtt:oi'tlt:t
i r.r lir l, ir/rr {.o [,lrl i'o I lovl in(J I.(]tt I lrt't.,;rci'l.y :
A PART OF TRACT C AND OF LOT K, BLOCK 5-E, VAIL VILLAGE 1ST F]LiNG COUNTY OF
EAGLE,STATE OF COLORADO. ALSO KNONN AS VILLAGE CENTER ACCORDING TO THE CONDO-
MINIUM MAPS THEREOF AND AS DEFINED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATiON RECORDED
NOVEMBER 20, 1972 IN BOOK 226 AI PAGE 362 AND THE FIRST SUPPLEMENT THERETO
RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1973 iN BOOK 231 AT PAGE 381 AND THE SECOND SUPPLEMENT
THERETO RECORDED APRIL 25, L975 IN BOOK 239 AT PAGE 574, COUNTY OF EAGLE,
STATE OF COLORADO.
A, Easettteni;s thaL al'l'c.:cl. l,ho abovo clescri bclcl 1:ro1:eri;J/ .r'e as i'clIr.rr,rs;
1) EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ItlAY F()R GORE CREEK AS IT AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LOT AS SHOI^IN ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF VAIL VILLAGE FIRST
FILING.
2) UTILITY EASEMENT 40 FEET IN W]DTH AFFECTING THE NORTHElLY PORTION OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHO[^,N ON THE RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR VILLAGE
CENTER.
3) EASEMENT AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOI'IINIUM DECLARATION FOR
VILLAGE CENTER AS F0LL0r,,JS: .'
PARCEL Tt^10' A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT 0N, 0vER AND AcR0ss rHE F0LL0WING
DESER'IBED-pARcEL FoR puRposEs 0F rNGREss r0 pARCEL oNE AND EGRESS FR0r4
PARCEL ONE TO AND FROI,I THE PUBLIC STREET, TO [iIT:
lFgLryIrilc_AT THE SArD TRUE pOrNT 0F BEcrNNrNc AS DESCRTBED rN pARCEL Or{E;
THENCE N 8"57'37: hl, 70.30 FEET TO THE POINT r)F BEGINNII\:G OF SAID PARCELTl,l0; TllEllcE s 90"02,23,, I,l, 15.00 FEET; THEI,ICE N 9u57,37,'ll, 74.?g FEEI r0ANPOINT ON THE ARC OF A 145'77 FOOT RADIUS CURVE I.IHOSE CENiRAL ANGLE IS9"29'3DU AND I.IHOSE CENTER BEARS N 48U51'05" E, T45.77 FEET; THEI{CESOUTHEASTERL\ 24.15 FEET ALQNG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THi LEFT. THELONG CIIORD OF I^JHICH IS S 45UOO'58'' E , 24.12 FTET; TIIENCE S 8057'i7" i,55.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING:
PARCEL ONE. COI4MENCING AT A POINT IN^SAiD TRACT C FROI.4 I{HENCE THE NORTHI.IESTC0-ffiER-0F-L0T B, BLocK s-B BEARS i at0i5's0,, tl, 7s.44 rrriJ iurr'ri; i'i 64u"-'42'56U l/J, 32.00 FEET; THENCE S 99U17'04'' I,l, 1,L1,DO FEET; THENCE S 86017'04't/l,_115.00-EEFT Ig THE TRUE p0INT 0F BEGINNiNGi THENCE S'3057,37" E, 14.68
IEEIA ! 71"53'00', tlJ,69.55 FEET: THENQE N 8u57,37" tll,96.05 FEET; fHrlCr
f!_8q"02,23u E, 68.66 FEET; TIIENCE S Bu57'37" E,70.30 FEET T0 THE TRUE POIITOF BEGINIIING.
NOTE: DECLARANT RESERVES THE RIGHT T(] GRANT OTHER OIdNERS OF CONDOMINIUMUNITS LOCATED ON PROPERTY A SIMILAR EASEMENT FOR INGRE5S AND EGRESS.
DECLARANT FURTHER RESERVES THE EXCLUSIVE AND SOLE RIGIIT TO VACATE SAID
EASEMENT FROM TIME TO TIME DURJNG THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT AND TO RELOCATE TIJE MEANS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE PUBLIC
STREET.
tlai;ccl : SEPTEMBER 7, 1983
(llrc liab'i Iii,y oi'l.ht:00lll)i.uty i:; lirrr ii,i:cl Lrr i.in i::l lriritl iiri il) jljr t.')
a
4) SET BACK LINES 10 FEET IN IIIDTH ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LOT LINE AND 15
FEET iN I,JIDTH AL0NG ALL 0THER LOT LINES 0F SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOtlN 0N
THE RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF VILLAGE CENTER.
5) UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1975 IN BOOK 238 AT PAGE 501.
6) EASEMENTS AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THE
CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR VILLAGE CENTER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOIdS:
EASEMENT FOR VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM PARKING
AREA FROI,I DEDICATED STREETS. THERE IS RESERVED TO DECLARANT, HOWEVER, THE
RIGHT TO LIMIT OR CHANGE SAID EASEMENT FOR VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN JNGRESS
AND EGRESS SO THAT ACCESS hJILL BE DIRECTLY INTO THE LOI.IER LEVEL AND NOT
|,JITHIN THE UPPER PARKING LEVELS.
EASEMENT OVER AND ACROSS SAID LOWER LEVEL OF BUILDING D FOR VEHICLE AND
PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS TO AND FROM THE UPPER LEVELS OF THE BUILDING
AND FOR UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, REPAIR, CONSTRUCTION AND RECONSTRUCTION.
NOTE: DECLARANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RELOCATE SAID EASEMENTS FOR PARKING
AND VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS FORM TIME TO TIME.
7) EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED ON FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO MAP OF VILLAGE CENTER AS
FOLLOWS:
IA&EIL T!lO. A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ON, OVER AND ACBOSS THE FOLLOI.IING
DFCffEE-D pARcEL FoR THE puRposE 0F INGRESS r0 pARcEL oNE AND EGRESS FRoM
PARCEL ONE TO AND FROM THE PUBLIC STREET, TO-WIT:
BEGINNING AT THE SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AS^DESCRIBED IN PARCEL ONE; THENCE
SOUTH 8"57'37" FAST, 14.68 FEET; THENCE S0UTH 71'53'00" WEST, 106,62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 1i"07'OO'' t,lEST, 10.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID
PARCEL TW0; THENCE S0UTH 71u53'00" t,lEST,206.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19u07'
00: EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE N0RTH 71u53,00" EAST 205.28 FEET; THENCE NoRTH
1]."07'OO'' WEST, 10.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL T|^lO
C0NTATNING 2058.95 SqUARE FEET 0R 0.0473 ACRES, M0RE 0R LESS.
PARCEL ONE. COMMENCING AT A P0INT IN SAIQ TRACT C FROM. WHENCE THE NoRTHt^iESr
AIEF-TF-LoT B, BL0cK s-B BEARS s0urH 37u15,50,'^wEsr 79.44 FEEr; THENCE
N0RTH 64"42'56"^!dEST 32.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'i7,04" TJEST 117,00 FEET;
THENCE S0UTH 8n"17'04" WEST 115.00 FEET T0 THE TRUE p0lNT 0F BEGINNIHG;
THENCE SOUTH 8"57'37''^EAST 14.68 FEET; THENCE SOIJTH 71U53'OO'' I.JEST 106.62
FEET; THENCE NORTH 11"07'OO" t^tEST 10.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF
SAID PARCEL ONE; THENCE SOUTH 71U53'OO''^WEST 49.77 FEEIi THENCE NORTH 11U
07'00" HtsT 45.05 FEETT THENCE SOUTH 78u53'00" WEST 24.70 FEET; THENCE
N0RTH 1i"07'0O"^WEST 42.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78'53'O0"^EAST 31.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"07'00" WEST^16.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78"53'00" EAST^
49,10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11"07'OQ'' EAST 21.i0 FEET; TI.IENCE NORTH 78"53'OO"
EAIT 21.40 FEET; THENCE S0UTH 11"07'00" EAST 39.70 FEETI THENCE S0UTH
78,53'OO" I,IEST 27.70 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 11U07'OO'' EAST 36.59 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL ONE, CONTAIN]NG 7135.05 SQUARE FEET OR
0.1638 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
,'oa
////rAff ery : 7///E / //s€ FMz'/4/7'r/B /z:so f
frc*r FrVl4 /t/r /f4 :-,grw rfzrHts U,n^)
//{tuZmfL ?e / fu,rtzc/ 4fFAf
/'x'trtN et cnqe'?-( ' Sil ;-"8?- lr //uta€ /nfl<tu4 57pt4tt/F
/./tr725:W kzze-L, d^l Try rc G,<tt€
-fyau}"lryfu4t1=e,t6 e,qtr4 bt,A/ /t.,%)ru\.4-f-.. -Ue(
f/zzzftf6'z{-O, 7o, U/Lt--ft€ Udlre/
azlrcl F€ "lorr .-767t1ct/6'
,J4fffrr"t"- f /a-/0.'7aVM
n an u67/, 4f f. r, ::i t fu y/gMryf/fu*h"f er*"/
A Ary/d'-''"'4 r+'4f
;/a;a:tu
- /Jqtl/- tt?rf€ *Tvll /dM- bt'.J z fu,tntfuz:'I rwrl Hrv'//o *&ta- wr rc rpnrzrft{ /2.
@zffnattS:
- a 6/l.2 ze+ /,2/z-
-/"ivA ,rZ^€ /**/ onl t"u^f --a*L a-z<-u 'z2u/a;* 5'L^4'-ry n+;
94-.1 Jfrl
.h-+&A /242-- 2',/* *.4--*%
Z 4*f fita*--z,z-| /4&,1*
t,r Ltu
*"hl 1,,4"
/o:>o * //:n
/H
//t* - /t;9t lfttt'ilt"Iflf)ituff/
?t
t ?tl
//,t, - ( z : n_t}t[1\.fi\tl$[ \\V a+
(z:ao-/z"'Lo@tt
-#{il,}tT|\tl '
L-
ia
-- l,*;t' A
/-)%az?- u ) "-./#*
tu ,t//rzL- 6dYz tuT3
/'w'--! <n- / /
- eri d^4*u- /-*J--'L-t tL , tu% /*-ef', Ay'4."7 /-*/*" L-7 ry tr/*/l l"rpuzu+"t*A 41, t L7-*L' ( #"-k? n' H
/a.'yo cw*- 6"r"r;r/" ?o4,4*- *,o d, u,,,Lr>/ %:r#4r* //uarZj *Or
A ,, (,-/ [-twr,r-7 t
- l-flffiq r-*.nt tuiLua/L r,J//*/ MoIZ / fu";? a4a H/ j h,r/z/ 4 Zt--
04 -/ * Yr** n/La 2//,L/z>z vy'/e, r
afu
-a^t/U A/r,a 5./4//14
fu h"-r % s/.4*1 /
- g/ tZ; -rf,..- 3 4 (ta'p*/1.o2 4 4h4*t** sfu-o(/il.*r."//,;/ //'; /flqrLV,^b/*{ryryh,*-t!fu,T-;LJ,;/^,r4./-
,-- -/t--/,-,2"-,,---!{h /l* 4h fra-/- **)/rfi )2. A744 4tdlat -t-*7L
-hK? Lrr*rt
7
-,v
lr*4V",r1*+
7,: (7 -- rafu 52b lQhry h.Z, g..z Sr*z /4,2 u
!,*,-,n,,'* ffi: frtfu4;,,*ktr8"
->/?,4 /-l /r-,,t/ f 4/^t 5*4 l/
1 " rf khc^? f'"*/ - d/'" 2* I
1/'*-rttA/ry I t/,/,,,n, Wf|-rj
k* /*,-t - f* ^/ f x4o 2 //:[Z
-!.a
/ /* t+ , /r- tt.ua- / /. A,^VJ x
Hr/fur.":l /j/-1,<- / r-z Fd" "'.1 ,.,i^,A #,. >/"e.-/ tu fefti^g alu uu1h"*1/.
Z /,Ur-^ hnL z', f, /(. *'*/ L
*,,1 ; /uf /*,*t*
rt/b1/?//4 htz/Z to, 4 /(//^7*4/+ ?/,4417 ' 2'-,#7 -
?A-h *"r'a*6
/ ftla l,tn ee zn oaT A-c-. ///'t4{/ C.I4/4MA/
dr-*^r/ 4, L ,^-/,'u^u 44#,-r/r&,WL",Jhd'^ffi,;7lwf,;r;/,-; g',-,zz; f/ t/-"1ua
I
3@Slw,q
L"*rro4' 5{ ur,*,*-4 Cr--tA ill-ZQ/r*/
ffi--ffi^*;*?'-/--'"-/
74€ trt/na4; 1:lo V
-+h4 ^tf/M:ilr(ryfu@uh
-fi-/=; /mZr;o )dAL
- SdJL-r%&rM u
/-;* uL u.- */ilh*p u)4,2 A
4 lUE k4^^/r* 4 /hv<-€G*.-.2.t//,4 A
a.tuu a'"r*/ tt #
/,;
/^";".dffi
ll:.l5
l2:00
3: 00
Planning and Environmenta'l Commission
March 26 , '1984
am Site Visits
- 3:00 pm Study session with Town Council on lodge room dens'ity, sulffner' resort study, and park'ing program
pm Public Hearing
Approva'l of minutes of March 12' 1984.
A request to establish a special development district for the
purpciseof redeveloping the Sonnenalp Hotel to allow additional
accommodation units and cormercial space. The Town Council
has sent this jtem back to the Planning and Environmental Commission.
Applicant: $onnenalp at Vail-..----
Request for an exterjor alteration and for a setback variance in order
to add four dwelling units to the Concert Hall Plaza building at
6]6 West Lionshead Circle in Commercial Core II.
Applicant: Selby Tofel Associates
Request for a front setback variance of .|.6 feet for an existing buj lding'
Ouild.ing I of the Vail Racquet Club Townhomes located at 4770 Bighorn
Road. Applicnat: Vail Racquet Club Townhomes
Request for a gross residential floor area variance on Lot l2' Block
2,'Vail Village Filing 13, west unit, in order to construct a 200
foot greenhouie, enclosing a partial'ly enc'l osed patio deck over the
garage. Applicants: James and Patricia Hansen
l
2.
?
4.
5.
o
CormissionPlanning and Environmental
April 9, .l984
PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Diana Donovan
Scott Edwards
Gordon Pierce
Duane Piper
Howard Rapson
lJi I 1 Trout
ABSENT
JIM VIELE
The meeting was ca1led to order at 3:00
Peter Patten
Tom Braun
Kristan Pritz
Lamy Eskwith
Betsy Rosolack
pm by Duane Piper, chairman.
l. Approval of minutes of March '12 and March 26.
Pierce moved and Donovan seconded to approve the corrected minutes of March .12.
The vote was 6-0 in favor. Trout correbtea tne March 26 minutes so that hisreason for voti.ng against the Sonnenalp special development district would read:"because he did not feel.any project should be approved that would have any negativeeffeg! on TOv_property (i.e. the bus shelter, paving, trees, or otherimpr6vemlntsexlstlng)." Donovan moved and Rapson seconded to approve the March 26 minutesas corrected. The vote was 6-0 in favor.
2.uest for a front setback variance of 1.6 feet for an existinq buildin
o the Va cq uet Club T homes oca at 0 rncant:cquet utu 0wn s
Tom Braun explained the request. He stated that Bui'lding I had been constructedonly'18.4 feet from the front property 1ine, resulting in a 1.6 foot encorachmentinto the setback. Braun added that the variance would have no impact on existingor potentia'l uses and structures, but that there was no evidence to indicatea physical hardship, merely human error.
walter Kirch, the applicant, said that he found that the Town of vail owned theadjoining property, and that he considered asking for either a land swap ora'land acquisition, but decided to first ask for a variance. He felt thlt thegranting of this variance would not consistitute a grant of speciai privilege
because of other similar variances including one in-l981 for iot 12 in Bigh6rn 4thwhich was 18.2 feet from the property line.- He added that granting of th! vaiiancewould not be detrimental to the pub'tic health, safety or welfare, ind felt thathe qualified because the strict or litera'l inierpretition and eniorCement w6riif::ylt,in practical difficulty and would deprive'the applicant of privitegei
enJoyed by the owners of other properties in the same districr.
Trout moved and Pierce seconded to approve the variance request because the
anOwould not be detrimenta'l to the public health, sifety or wblfare hnd was-wiruantedbecause the strict or literal inierpretation ind enf6rcement of the specifiedregulation wou'ld result. in practical difficulty or unnecessary physicil hardshipinconsistent with the obieclives of the zoning-code. The vote was 6-0 in favor.
3.uest
PEC -2- O'ry
for a dens i t control vari ance in order to add 92 s uare feet oftoan ex st in n unit on t e top floor oft e.p l rcan unDlrO Lo
Tom Braun explained that at the meeting of March 12, lgg4, the applicants hadtwo requests, and the rqqgglt to add an.employee unit was grantei. The requestto add 92 square feet of GRFA was tabled.becalse of some qiesiion conleri1ii6---the number of kitchens allowed at the lodge.
The staff met with the applicant to resolve the issue concerning how many unitsjl tl" Sunbird Lodge may have kitchens. A court order Iimiteo ltre numuei.iol3' but the Conmunity Development-department emoneously issued a bui'lding permitfor the installation of another kitchen in the fal'l of -19g3.
To allow for a kitchen in the 5th floor unit, the applicants agreed to renovea kitchen from another ynj! and have agreed to an oir-site inspEction. ttre-enaresult would be i4 legal kitchens.
Bruce Parton, applicant, stated that the unit was not functiona'l , and he wastrying to improve an exist'ing unit, not add another unit. Discuision CeniereOaround whether or not the added GRFA would be adding bulk and mass. Braun remindedthe board-that they must establish a hardship and Pitten telt thii ttris-requeiiwas more for convenience.
$apson felt that this was a condition not generally applicab'le to other situations.Edwards felt that there was a physical hardship. he-r.e,'iriper stated that the ieag"w9: lot habitable space' Donovan felt that the'board did'not have a toot wittt--'whjch to approve the variance. Trout felt that the board had approvea tne'emptoveeunit with the result that_the applicant was left with ini niea tb expand ine ''-
adjacent unit. Pierce felt the density and bu1k were not being incriasea-inOPiper agreed.
Trout moved and Pie@ the requested GRFA variance.
UutBraun felt that in light of what had gone on in the past, plus the letier ofcommitment from the applicant, the staff would be awire 6t'tne neea io-inspe"tthe units. Donovan pointed out that originally both top floor units wereemployee units.
Jhe votg wgs !:J wj!h,Dgnovan aqaiT:t becEuse she felt that the board did nothave a tqql with whiih to etpFovE-The variance.
4.uest for an exterior alteration to the Villa Center ldinpl i cant:
Peter.Patten_explained the request pv !!rst showin!-TEiiil-iifise movie from twolocations. First from.the top of the TRC looking iouilr"ait, ltren rrom lre wesiside. .He pointed out the "rost tourist"_autos ana tiie wiv ftre peaesiiiin- "---
avoided the sidewalk in front of the Village Center ano wilked iown tne iireet.p.qllvery problems._were evident on both on-both the eist and west ends of the-Vi 1 l age Center bui'ldi ng.
Patten explained that.the planning staff encouraged Hibberd to treat his app'licationas a master plan and to include one comprehensiv6 proposal .
PEc -3- 4/s/84 o
Patten showed a site p1 an and expla'i ned that there was a loading problem on eastside with no 'loading zone. This wou'ld be overcome with the joint'toaaing-iaiiiitvshared. by the sonnenalp. patten then said the loading zone on the west sidewould be removed to.help to.get pedestrians onto the iiaewalr. in" ioiaing-onthis side would be internaliied adjacent to the-buiiaiig. -
Patten-explained that the two story addition on the east end was the same heiqhtat La Tour and the eave line would continue ac"oss. He eipiain"o-lrrui-tn"""'""would be a roof over the steps which went down io-ariiJing'n. itre majo""".u.tignof the sidewalk included plai:ing it closer to the street, and alio t6"v *.i.--''made easier to get onto cbming irom crossroads. The street would be 26 feetwide with snow itorage areas between the street and the sidewark.
The retai'l fronts were_to be redesigned to better relate to the sidewalk, andthere would be a small amount of s{uare.footage added to each store, along witha redesigning of the stairs to the Toymakeris irait:-- - -'
Patten described the.Urban Deqign Guide Plan with relation to the sub-area concepts'18 through.22. He then stated ihe proposal complieJ nriit,-corr."cial Core IIzone district's requirements.
The setback variance-was requested in order to share the loading dock with theSonnenalp.. The loading buiiding would overlap the propertv-line and would beconstructed at the request of the staff as a solutibn lo t-ne loading p.oUi.rifor both projects.
Patten read 8 conditions for approval . Hibberd discussed the conditions andstated that he would feel more'comfortable if the Town couid set a date whenthe. improvements in sub-area #20 would be done. He ioaeo-ilrat he wouro iit<eto have the Town remove the snow if it needed to be trauiea oii-iite,-uut iiiithe wou'l d othenrise install and maintain the sidewalks.
The west end was discussed with some of the board fee'l ing that something shouldbe done to make the garage entrance more appealing. -Hib6erd stated that he intendedto.pg'!nt the interioi of-the garage. piercb suggEsted a garage aoor or gui., --
and Hibberd said he would tak6 th6 suggestion uider advis6meni. tte poinied-6utthat a gate was a major maintenance fiitor.
Rick.Baldwin, architect.for the.project, explained how the steps and sidewalkswould work and said that the sidbwaik w6uld''ue e-ie;i"wiie.- ii"rrins ir-iil '-
parking area in the buitding was explaing! by Hibilfu *to-itut.o ttrit tne inopowners had assigned parking-spaces, but that-ttre iiuaio'ionjot did not have iluparKlng spaces in the building. -Patten_explained that the applicant was reqirtrea
19 P.{ for. parking. spaces in ihe village earking'5irr"iu"i"ino was not alowedlo pul parking on his site. piper stated that he had many letters of oppositonfrom.Merv Lapin and from the cohdo owners in suiiainor n.'"s. an<r c.Loading-on the west end^was.discussed again. -r.ini fii""inl'""p".r.nting theowners in.Buildings A, B and C explainei that ttre irroperiu'o*n"", did have manvopposlng tdeas' but that.they had met with Hibberd'anb ttri problem areas had- -
been resolved and she had a ietter to submit io il'"-p"*ui.lt fit. from the Villagecenter Association to Hibberd agieeing-io several itbms. patten pointed out- '-''
that this would be an agreement that ihe Town woura-noi-ue a part'of.
PEc -o-Q,n,ro
Ann Louthan, President.of the. Building D Condo Association, explained that thecondos in Buirding g djg not have any-parking spaces in irre ouirjlng, uut-neejeaa place to park while they unloaded thbir aulos. stre fe]t that ro16'il,in;;;--'space was needed, and the autos needed to be in the spaces about 30 minuiei.-
Hibberd explained that there would be no problem with parking near the doors,but the cars courd not be .reft in the ioading zprlF. .Louthan asked if the condoor{ners in Buildino D would.be paying foi any"oT-tit iiliioilEiients, and Hibberdreplied that they-would not. Loirttrin menii6nea iiiit't[!-."ndo owners felt thechanges to the bui lding would be a great improvemeni
Rapson was concerned with_the appearance of the west end when the riprap wallwas-removed, and especiaily frqn the.point of view or ine touriiis ibmilg"upWillow Bridge Road. He telt it would'be better io r,.u""in-intrance that peoplecould not see. Hibberd repf ied that he had had to iepiaie iu.ag" doors threetimes. He felt that a tacb lift would be enough to improve"the entrance.Rapson asked about exterjor lighting, ana-HiOU6ra-r.pll.i'ih" on" wooden lampwould. be repraced with ramp. poits, ina satawin-rJtt-tr,ai-tne aiiprav-iigl,ii'inthe shops would heip to tibht the sidewalk.
son moved and Edwards seconded to a rove the side setback variance for thevote was 6-
on moved and Trout seconded toa rove the exterior alterations, for thes r oera ons ru nctuoed rn the mo ontiosted on oft mem0 th extra attent toanqes on t e west 0t the nq.vote was b-u tn favor.
5. R uest for a dens i t control vari ance in order to enclose a hot tub atot8aVillastca: ve roa ts. $,yche
Tom.Braun explained that at.the-February l3th meeting of the pEC a side setbackYgljln:" was,approved to allow for an e-xtensive "erJiei oi"ir,ii r.ria.n..l-oi.''element of which was a hot tub on a rooftop deck. rnts ippiication was i6 enirorethe hottub with a oreenhouse lvPe of enclosure that would' add 72 square feet ofGRFA--.He added ilrit the staffi^ecommended j.niii-0..i;;; ;; hardship had beenestabl ished.
Tim c1ark, architect for the applicant, read the letter of request. He explainedthat. the space would be unheatbi and wis riihort ;i;;; i...r, from the insideof.the unit. He fett that.the.grantins or the-vari;;;; ;;;id not be detrimentaland also felt that the strict iiterprelafion wouio ii,p"ii].-ir,. ippiicini';;-'-''privileges gnjoyed by the owners of'other properties in the-same district, andthat it would not be-a grant of special priviiege.
Donovan fe] t that she could not support the request because there would then be
PEC -5- 4/9/84
many other similar requests to enclose hot tubs. The board concuped, and manyfelt that it would be good.to'look at GRFA definitions to allow many iimilarrequests with changes in the zoning code./
Rapson moved_anC Pierce seconded to deny the request with the findinq that thegranting vlouldf. he did not want tovo in the zoning code. - Faiten-pJinieJ-out that at this time there was no active study, but th;t within l-1* ybars thewhole zoning code could hopefully be examined lnd revised. He added-t-hat he couldnot_promise that when the changes were done, there would be a way to allow hottubencl osures.
P'iper reminded Clark that the applicant had l0 days in which to appeal the decisionto the Town Council.
Kristan-Pritz explained that the four applicants each owned condominiums on thenorth side of the Lodge at Lionshead, Phase II. Each unit had a balcony ficingthe Lionshead Parking Structure and were requesting to enclose the balconies tominimize the impacts from the parking structure. Fritz explained that the projectwas over the allowable GRFA. She also added that the park'ing structure was builtafter the Phase II was constructed, but added that sincb othei dwelling unitswere_-also similarly 'impacted, there was no extraordinary c'i rcumstances and thestaff reconrnended denial.
James Thorburn' one of the applicants, stated that all four applicants were orig'ina'lowners' that when they purchased the units there was no parking structure. Hestated that now their porches were unusable. because of iroise,-'l ights and dust.He pointed out that the Athletic Club and Mountain Haus in th6 ViIlage would besimilarly impacted, but that the Town had planted a berm to mitigate-any disturbancefrom the Village parking structure.
Scott Thorburn, representing the applicants, had four points to make. l) thatthis was.existing.floor area and it wou'ld not increase'occupancy, 2) thaa the applicantshad considered other measures such as trip'le glazing of the sliding g1 ass ooors,but_that since the glazing constituted all of-the light and ventilatjon, thiswould not be effective when the doors were open, 3) the design of the buildingamplified the sounds from the parking structure, and 4) since glazing was sucia.]argg part of the affected units, iound boardi would'not help muchi He feltthat these four units were closer to the parking structure thah others and sothis,was a-unique situation. He felt that a stiict interpretation of the codewou'ld deprive the applicants of priv'ileges enjoyed by the'owners of other propertiesin the same district.
Trout felt that he had been sympathetic to the staff's position, but now had mixedemotions because the use of the porches.was diminished. Donovan wondered if otherbuildings jn the area were similariy affected. Thorburn stated that because ofthe way the building was constructed, it amplified sound. Donovan wondered just
what about the construction amplified the sound. Piper fe] t that from observino
leQYesl for a GRfl vlriance il,order to enclose the porches of four adjoinins
conoomrntums at the Lodge at Lionshead, Phase II.Applicants: Faz ff, and Janet Steele
orrO-u- 4/s/84
the porches that day, 1p appearea that these units were impacted.mbre thanothers. Donovan feit that.the light from. autos wou'ld hit hisli", f[.; iil;;"porches, and Thorburn_replied thai nevertheless, enough iiSni i"o1n Jno* iio",hit at the porch level to be a nuisance, and ttre poriies cJnstituted ttre'oniyopening to the exterior, and furniture could not be ieii Jut because of the amountof dust that setiled.on the.porch. The applicant wai-artii *nat effect theparking lot had had before the structure i,ris built,-ind-iil-stated that sincethe cars and snowplows were.at a rower rever, they'did-noi intruae is-muinl-anathere was also less traffic.
Edwards felt that perhaps-this was an extraordinary circumstance because of theangle and the closeness'of the units to the struiti"". -ooiouun felt that sincethese units were at the same level as the top oi ttr.-parling structur€, the hardshipof the dust was not.*eated bv tlg applicanti. Ai;; i[."ii;t that ioui i""pi.were affected, not just one, tould elilain the uniqueneis. She added-tnli-ineljgll t::l.l:.9i:s!!r would-affect olhers, but the'ausi iirected on.ly theseun'r!s' mak'lng the porches unuseable. Trout suggested gypsum board t6 auioru:ou19' along with studying the buirding to see-if ttrere iai un upiriit,-iia-suggesteot0 the applicants that they table for iurther studies.- -
o
Edwards moved to approve the variance but there was
Rapson moved and Pi er seconded to den the variancerant o spect a e r ncons stent w
n strict.
asailsT-Aenr-T1;
no second.
because it would be
on other rti es
l0 days in which to appeal the rulingPiper reminded the-applicants that they hadto the Town Council.
Trout asked Piper to poll the board membersa variance that asked for screens, and mostnot have helped the applicants' situation.
see if they would have grantedthe board felt that screens would
to
of
7.uest for a stream setback variance in order to bui'ld a dwel'ling on,Lgt 2,vai I Vi I lage West Fi I ing #2.cant: The E mo.re up
8.uest to rezone Lot 3 Vail Villa e West Filinq #2en 5paEe to Residentia rlma onda . App tlcan
applicant of these two requests asked to table to April 23. Rapson movedThe vote was 5-0.
for the,request and asked the board for
.much discussion, and Lamy Eskwith eiplainedrne extsrrng hazard section of the zOning
riculture and
more Group L td.
The
and'Edqards seconded to table
9.uest to amend the Town of Vail zonin qode, Chapter .|8. 69 [azard Requ1atito include prov ons for eo loqlc haza nvest i qati on an mi ti qati onn ail areas 0 e Town whic ave been entified as vtn tenti ageotogic problems.pp I i cant:
Peter Patten explained the reasoningapproval of the ordinance. There wisthat this was merely an amendment to
code.
PEc -7- Jsrc+
George Hallenbeck, representing the Booth creek area of lomeowners wno wereimpacted by the recent rock fall d'iscussed with Eskwith whether or not property ownerswould have to solve any hazard problems. He felt that the Town should irot'be -
able to affect additions to homes already built. He added that the Town wasaffecting property values.
The board discussed a simitar sitation, the LeRoy petition to bui'ld a garage,which was in a severe avalanche path and construltion of the garage wai aei'i 64.
Hallenbeck was concerned about the affect on the Booth creek property values.More discussion followed abodt various areas of concern.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Donovan moved and son seconded to recommend to the counci 1 the amendmbnt
ul ati ons rthes wit
C'l arify who pays for the studjes.Describe the fact that sites that are already built upon must notincrease risk by adding on to the dwel 1ing.Sectjon .l8.64.010 Purpose, Line b, add,'sieep,' before "slopes.,l0n.page 2, Section 4, paragraph A, add "AlI i-eports and stildies requiredunder this chapter shall be prepared under the direction of the owner/applicantand submitted to the Community Development Department."
The vote was 5-0 in favor.
The meeting adjourned at 8:'15 pm.
concern s
VILLAGE CENTER ASSOCIATIONP.O. Box f87Vail, Colorado 81558
March 16, I984
,t.
tut
' ,/'l (6
,l /.,r1li':t
" r' i)l'
Mr. Fred Hibberd
1977 South Park Route
Jackson, Wyoning 8300f
Dear Mr. Hibberd:
The purpose of thrs letter is to set fortb the
agreement between you as the develoPer of the ViIIage
Center commercial building (iCommerci-al Building") andVillage Center Association, the condoniniun association forVillage Center Condominiums ( ItCondominiums" ). As you are
awarer the Association has filed certain objections to your
proposed expansion of the Commercial Building. As a result
of our recent neetings, a resolution of the dispute between
us has been obtained and the Association has agreed to
withdraw any objections it night have rnade to the
Commercial. BuiLding upon the conditions set forth below-
We have agreed that this letter and your obligations under
this letter shalJ. be made a part of and a condition of any
approval of the Connercial Building renovation project and
shaLl. be subrnitted to all further Town of Vaif boards and
bodies reguired to approve the project and that any
approval shall be conditioned uPon your fulfilling the
terms hereafter set forth.
We have agreed as folJ.ows:
I. AII improvenents to the Commercj'al Building
shaLl be constructed within the 10 foot Town of VaiI build-
ing set-back line.
2. Soow nelt plates wlll be lnstal1ed on theroofs ou the south side of the expanslon buildlng so that
ice and aoorr may not accumulate on such roofs and cause dan-ger to pedestrlans between the Com!0ercial Building and the
Condomlniums.
3. Prior to Tonn of VaiL Bullding Department ap-proval of construction drawings, the proposed locatlon of
the expansLon to the Commerclal Building wlll be staked and
the Town of Vail Flre Departnent shaLl conflrm that they
have adequate accesa to Bullding A Vtllage Center. Thls 1n-
cludes location of etand plpes and fire equlpment accesa.
4. You wL11 lnstall sheet rock on the second
floor level only of the parklng garage ce111ng where exposed
steel atructure now exlsts.
5. The flre door withln the parking garage wlll
be nade operable.
6. You w111 relocate the exhaust vent now serving
Ptzza Pane so that exhaust 16 no longer vented through the
garage but ls Lnstead vented outsLde Vll1age Center D Butld-lng.
7. You will conplete nodlflcation of the drlveway
on the nest slde of the Connerclal Buildlng in accordance
wlth the pJ-ans subnltted to the Town of Vail, dated
-4e4-r-4-_--' 1e84.
8. You wlll glve the Aasoclation the authorlty onyour behalf to request the Town of Vall Pollce DePartment to
ticket and to pernlt the A6eociation to tow vehicles parked
ln the upper or lower level parking garage eotrylray or ac-
ce6a thereto which are blocking accea6 to parkJ-ng spaces,
and you ni11 take such other steps aa are necessary to pre-
ve[t your tenanta fron parklog in such entryway.
9. You w111 in8ta11 a fire exit door fron the
Commercial Bullding expanelon lnto the parklng garage and
use your beet efforta to relocate any other flre exlt doors
connected wlth euch expansl,on so that there Ls no exlt on
the south elde of the expanslon building' except for the
exlt door and screen on the Bouth side shown on the plans
Bubnltted to the Town of Vall , dated }4ar_ch 28r984.
-2-
10. You wlll relocate the gas meter and gas valve
as ehonn on the plans subnltted to the Town of Vall r dated
i'{arch 28 , 1984.
11. You nl11 relocate the existing electrlctransformer sltuated adjacent to the Condomlniuns, to be ad-
Jacent to the exlstlng tranaformer abutting the garage of
the Conmercial Bul1dtng.
L2. You ri1l install a vleual screen between thegarage on the Coumercial Buildlng and the Condomlnluns 'whlch screen wlll be attractLve and of an easlly malntaln-
able materLal in accordance wlth pLans to be agreed upon be-
tween vou and the Asgoclatlon.
13. You wl11 lnstal1 a stand plpe systen for Flre
Departnent water acceas fron East eadow Drive to the back
side of the Expanslon Buildlng, for Building A fire Protec-tlon.
14. You wl11 paint the cellings ln the Connerclal
Buildlng garage.
15. You will reimburse the Associatlon for rea-
sonable coats ln the amount of $2J00-QO- for thelr land-
scapl.ng (of the areas adJacent to the exlstlng Commercial
Bullding) whtch wl11 be destroyed as a result of your exPan-
/reinrbgrSe the 8lon, and/transplant all trees to Property surrounding the
Associaticrn Condominlun Building.
for the cost to f6. The planned trash enclogure for the Commer-
cial Bulldlng wt11 have fire sprinklers and be enclosed.
17. You wtll flx the leaks ln the north slde of
the Commerclal Bul lding.
18. You w111 lnstall stucco on the south side of
the CommerclaL Buildlng garage where that area has been left
wLth bare concre te.
f9. You have consented to the Condonlniulo A6soci-
ation lnstalllng a gate on the accea6 way to the lower park-
lng garage 1n the Conmerclal Building, which gate nay be re-
located from tlme to time. Thls iten is to be paid for by
the Associatlon.
20. You have consented to the Associatlon in-
stalling heatlng coils in the access rtay to the lower level
parking garage. Thls item ls to be pald for by the Associa-
tlon.
-3-
2L. Stairs connecting East Meadow Drive and the
Condominiuns on the east si.de of the Commercial- Buildrng
will be naintained by you.
22. The apron on the West side of the upPer
fevel parking garage wiII be maintained and plowed by you.
All of the foregoing will be accompli'shed at
your cost and exPense excePt the instalLation of the park-
ing gate and the heating of the parking access. AIL the
foiegoing shall. be completed in accordance wi.th aII Town of
Vail Laws, ordinances and regulations prior to the issuance
of the first certificate of occuPancy for the Commerciaf
BuiId ing .
If the foregoing correctly sets forth your
understanding, please indicate by signing a copy of this
fetter where indicated beLow, after which this letter wilJ.
be defivered to the Town of Vail for inclusion in its
records.
Very truly yours t
VILLAGE CENTER ASSOCIATION
l. ,/Bv i/ 5 ,-^-* , y'-c'.--'^- ';t-?r€sftfgrft_ Artoe,-e, ro- Ftq c'
Accepted and Agreed to:
-4-
cmssfln[s
P. O. BOx 1228, vAlL. COLORAOO ' 81657 ' (3O:!) '076-5531
March 12, 1984
Peter Patton
Zoning Administrator
Town of Vail
Dear Peter,
Please note our objection to .the VjJ.laSe--Cen'Eer- expansj-on.It should not be allowed until there is a parking plan for
their building. The theory that people will park in thestructure fails miserably. They park at Crossroads and we arenot their parking lot.
JAMES D. KREIDLE
5205 Lakeshore Drive
LitOeton, Colorado 80123
Mareh 8, 1984
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
A. Peter Patten, Jr.' Zoning Administrator
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
Please refer to my letter to you of september ?1? 1983 _regarding the _proposed
exterior alteration Lneompassin! Vilage Center Building D. I haye- reeeived a public
noiio"-t"i".Oing ttre requist foi eonsfruction on this project and I am again stating
my objection to the development of this area on the basis that it removes a lanGcape
""t" ri.O open spaee from a somewhat already crowded situation. .I also understand
n"i inir pi.oposeO alteration will present somewhat of a fire proteetion hazard. I
trust that- the Town will consider -its stated poticy of maintaining open space in its
deeision on this proposed addition.
Re:
JDK/ljc
Proposed Changes to Village Center Buifding D
Very truly yours'_pq
^5,tlurroy Finoncial Corporctlon
Jack E. Crozier
Presidenl
I'larch 5, 1984
Planning Commission
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail , Col orado 8.|657
Gentl emen:
I understand that on March'12 there wi'l'l be a public hearingof the Planning and Environmenta'l Commission of the Town ofVail on a request for an exterior a1 teration to the Village
Center project at 122 East Meadow Drive and for certi-ii-Enisions to the existing retai'l development Iocated at
that address.
I am the owner of Unit 5-G in Vi'l lage Center and am
attaching a copy of a letter which I sent last year whenthis same proposal was being considered. I stil'l have
the same objections contained in that letter.
Crozi er
JEC:mI f
Attachments
Suite 600, 5520 LBJ Freeway
P.O. Box 809039, Dallas, Texas 7538G'9039 214/851-ff,4o
t -o
currently has before itgenerally known as Building
Murroy Fincrnciol Corporntion
Jack E. Crozrer
Presrdent
0ctober 3, 'l 983
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
A. Peter Patten, Jr., Zoning Adm'inistratorVail, Colorado 8.|657
Gentl emen:
It 'is my understanding that the Town of Vail
a proposal by Fred Hibberd regarding what is
D of Village Center.
The proposa'l is to add additional retail and commercial space to the
existing building at the expense of what little open space remains in
thjs project.
I would like to voice my oppos'i t'ion to such proposed changes on two
pri nc'ipa1 grounds.
Fjrst, I know that the Council shares my concern over the never ending
array of proposals to increase the density in the core area by constantly
encroaching on what precious little "green space" remains. The Town has
generaliy done an excellent iob by gettjng the most out of the few "vestpocket" planning areas that are available in the Town Center. Obviously,
proposals such as this not only eljminate open spaces, but also directly
impact the need for addjtional parking, service areas and traffic needed
to support more commercial deve'lopment. As a deve'l oper myself, I have
to live with the "take some leave some" approach to'l and usage. The
current proposal takes all and'leaves noth'ing. This is jn no one's best
interest, particular'ly in a town where tourism and, therefore, v'i sual
appeal , is its most important industry. The specific location of,the green space in quest'ion is particularly'important in view of thefact that it is directly in the line of vision when turning south off
of the service road into the public parking facility.
Suite 600, 5520 LBJ Freeway
P.O. Box 809039, Dallas, Texas 75380-9039 2141851-6640
t_
Town of Vail
Page Two
secondly' and just as important, is the fact that existing storagefacilities located on the ground floor parking garage of dui]diniD serious'ly hampers and ofien completely b'rocls-the"ingress and -
egress rights of those assigned pirking piuiei-on inil-t"u"t. Theretail establishments alreaiy in'p'l ace-have turned the back upspace for the condominium owners in village center into a deliverytunne'l for the retai'l establishments abov6. rrantty,-i im surprisedthat the Town of vail has not long ago designated t-his-aiea a firelane in view of the automobires aid leneral-storage ricitiiies rorflammab'le materials located on this ievel. irrorid-a ii""'oi.rr,particularly at the east end of this ground floor pirking iever,the. accessibility for. fire fighting e{uipment wouti ue himperedat best. To. expand this area, it ieems io me would le greatlymagnifying what is a1 ready a serious hazard.
For the above reasons, I am not only in favor of denying any furtherexpansion of Building D, but am also in favor of the Fiie Mirshaldesignating the egress and ingress areas of the first floor parkingstructure as fire lanes and prohibiting the use of this area'fordelivery.and service vehic'les for the itorage areas which iurrentlyexist and for the retail and commercia'l estiblishments in thef'loors above.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Jack E. Crozier
Unit 5G, Village Center
JEC:mlf
cc - Mr. Ceci'l Dotson, PresjdentVillage Center AssociationP. 0. Box'187
Va i'l , Col orado 81658
March 5, l9B4
Mr. A. Peter Patton, Jr.
Zoning Administrator
Town of Vai I
Department of Communi ty Devel opmentVail, C0 81657
Dear Mr. Patton:
Thank you for majling the pubfic notice of your March .l2, .|984
public hearing. We are writing to you about the expansion of
Village Center Bu'ild'ing D at 122 E. Meadow Drive by Fred Hibberd.
The Village Center Condominium Association will be representedat your meeting by Mr. Barry Permut, Attorney. However, I wanted
to wrjte to you as an individual property owner and express my
concern.
Last week I had an opportunity to review the concept prints of
the expansion. There are several areas of concern if theproject goes ahead as planned.
l. There is not proper setback from property lines. The prints
revjewed had confljctjng jnformation, but it showed a distanceof either eight feet between the proposed expansion and
Village Center Building A and there was a print that showed a
total of twelve feet. In ejther case, I do not believe that the
new bujlderis complying with the ten foot setback from property
line.
2. If the proposed expansion goes in, there is no way that adequatefire protection can be provided for Building A. This has also
been stated by your fire chief, which he has made a public
record of by writing a letter which is in your City files. I
would suggest that you obtain this letter and read jt.
3. Access to utilities such as the Holy Cross Electric transformerwill be completely blocked and the gas meter is going to have
to be relocated. My quest'ion is, where are these utjljtjes
going to be relocated? Who is going to pay for the cost of
relocat'ing them so that they can be servjced jn the future
without the expense of overhead cranes, etc.?
March 5, .1984
Page 2
4. l.Je are opposed to any commerc'ial facilities being located
on the south side of Village Center Building D. It will
create pedestrian traffic, not only from potential customersbut from delivery vehicles and service personne'l .
5. This has nothing to do with the proposed expansion of
Building D, but why is Fred Hjbberd allowed to operate
commercjal business from enclosed parking spaces on the
upper parking level . There are now sixteen enclosedparking spaces that should provide parking for the Building D
customers and employees that have been converted to commercialspaces. Not only does this eljminate parking places, jt also
creates more problems for parking because there are now morepeople, rnore servjce vehjcles using this fac'i1ity. The traffjcjam at the west end of V'illage Center are rjdjculous. I amof the opinion before Fred Hibberd is given plans approvalfor expans'ion that he should be made to obey the present
1aws, rules and regulations and clean up the mess he haspresently created.
If the present plan is approved without consjderatjon and correctjonfor the problems jndicated above, I as a board member of the Vil'lage
Center Association will support taking lega1 action against severalparties, including the Town of Vail.
Respectful 1y,
. Ja.z / ry4/h*'oy
GarY L.r/McDaniel
Village Center Unjt 4G
P.0. Box 'l8l
Sabetha, Kansas 66534
GLM/gm
4618 Crooked Lane
Dallas, Texas 75229
SePtember 24, 1983
Town of Vai-1
Mr. A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Department of Community Development
Vail, Colorado 8L657
Subject: Hibberd's Addition to Building D
Village Center
Gentlemen:
Three years ago we purchased a condominium in Building
C of vilfage -enter. One of our key reasons for
selection of this expensive location was the
appearance of the site.
We felt the management had effectively maintained
an appropriate amount of green atea. Now we feel
that the proposed commercial development markedty
reduces this appearance and consequently reduces
the value of our investment.
If this project receives your approval we intend to
financially support efforts to use lega1 pursui'ts
to protect the rights of the owners of Village Center'
/fe4/*
\o^^^.!^,o,-'-
Richard Hanschen
Patricia Hanschen
JAMES D. KREIDLE
5205 Lakeshore Drive
Littleton, Colorado 80123
September 23, 1983
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
A. Peter Patten, Jr., Zoning Adrninistrator
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re:Proposed Changes to Village Center Building D
Dear Mr. Patten:
I am curren0y an owner of a condominium in the Village Center Complex in VaiL I
have received notiee concerning proposed changes to Village Center Building D. I
objeet to this proposed addition to Village Center Building D on the basis that it
removes a landscape area and open space from a somewhat already erowded
situation. I also understand that this proposed alteration will present somewhat of a
fire proteetion hazard. I trust that the Town will eonsider its stated poliey of
maintainirg open spaee in its deeision on this proposed addition.
n L---->.4L,^2"-
Kreidle
JDK/ljc
RAYSTEVENSON
President Septenber 15, 1983
Tcrrn of VaiI
DepartJrent of Ccnm.mity DevelopEnt
A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Zcring AdninistratorVail, Colorado 81657
Dear Sir:
I dcject to the furLher develolxent of the already intensely utilized space
i-n ttre Village Center area. I specifically cbject to tlre further exlnnsi-an of
Building D.
I am a long ti:re cr'ttner of a ViIIage Csrter unit in the C Building and as
suctr believe that a furtJ".er intensificatiqr of ttre utilization of tlre spa.ce in
ttre Village Center area ttrtuld be detrilrental, not only to the Village Center
r:nit orners, lx-rt to the general irnage and arnbiance of the Tcrrm of Vail.
Unfortunately, I will be unable to be at tlre zaning hearing on SePtenber
26. Thark ycr.r for you consideration of nV ooncerns.
Sinoerely,
Unit 2J, Village Center
]|l|/
cc Cecil P. Dodscrt
CI IARTI-]R T{t.-DI ( :.4 L CORPORATiO.\
P. O. BOX 209 . 577 MULBERnY STREET. MACON, GEORGIA 31298 o (912) 741116l
o
Good
Fricnd
Electric
September 16, 1983
Town of Vail
Department of Comnunity DevelopmentA. Peter Patten, Jr., Zoning AdministratorVail, CoLorado 81657
Dear Sirs:
As an owner in Village Center I must emphaticall-y voice
my objection to the further encroachment on open landscapedareas by townspeople greedy for space
I have been coming to Vail for lwelve years. The patternof development has been clear.
1st year--Put chairs in front of property.
2nd year--Put fence around chairs and tables.
3rd year--Put awning over fence.
4th year--Put glass around awning.
5th year--Build a building.
The views which were once part of VaiI are now brick'stucco, and wood.
obviously those who don't live close by rea11y have littleopportunity to benefit monetarily from the usurpation of spaceby locals.
Our own investment is lessened by your lack of considerationfor open spaces and views. Enough of this. Do not approvefurther construction.
zR: jk
cc: Cecil Dotson
SERVICE AND RELIABILITY SINCE 1937
265 Highway 37 East .Toms River, New Jersey 08753 .Tel:
Very truly yours,
1t^ P,,'t^
z{v Rosen
(201) 349-4100
-9n".
82?2 ooUCLAS sutTE 300 DALLAq TEXAS 75225 214-987-1103
Septenber 13, 1983
Mr. A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Zoning Administrator
Tor,m of Va 11
Dept. of Comtrunity DevelopmenEVail, C0 8L657
Dear Mr. Patten:
In early August I received a notice fron the to\rn of Vail regarding Fred Hibbardrsproposed changes to Vil-lage Center Bullding D. In that notice I was informed there
Ita s to be a meet ing on August 22 by the Plannlng and Environmelgsl Qennn{ssion ofthe tovtn but that meeting rras postponed until Septenber 26. I had planned to bepresent at the August 22 neeting but am out of toun and unable to attend theSeptenber 26 neeting.
I rtant to go on record as being opposed to thls addition for the fo1-lowing reasons:
I believe ve need the green space and that .we have enough restaurantsln the village center area and certainly enough shops. It is a resi-dential area and I feel the addition of more restaurants and shops w111take away from not only the beauty of the area but from the residentlal-coruunity as well. In addltlon, Mr. Hibbard has not naintalned Buil-ding Dof Village Center ln the same nanner in which the rest of us have naintainedour buildings and there is no reason to bel_ieve that he will do so lfallowed to expand his present area. He also has not used the garage spaceas speclfied by the town of va11 and lf you check this thoroughly you wJ.lIfind that rnany of the garages have been rented out to b.usinesses and work-men's cars and trucks are parked ln the fire zones and no-parking areasas r^rell as the ounerts parking spaces in the garage below which tends to
rnake the entire area l-ook more like a parking lot than a residentlal
cornmunity .
r am also curious as to why the publl-c hearing \das not held on August 22 as Isuspect Mr. Hibbard requested a postponement due to the fact that he would receivetoo much heat from the owners who were present ln Vail during the month of August.By postponlng his hearing he could be assured that most of us would be gone thatrate ln september, thus uaking it easier for him to get clearance to expand hisBulldlng D operation. I sincerely hope the planning cormission will take a lookat Mr. Ilibbardts track record of perfornance with the toan of Vail and veto hisrequest for the proposed changes t.o Village Center Building D.
:k1ncc: Cecl1 P. Dotson
Very truly yours,
"LZ?, rl Nnr hrA*
M. H. Holberg U
Building C, Unit 4JVillage Center
CECIL DOTSON
P. o. Box187 . vArL. coLoRADo ar657
September 7, 1983
Mr. A. ?eter ?atten, Jr.
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
Dear Mr. Patten:
I am writing you regarding the request by Fred Hibberd to
add on to BuildinB D, Village Center. It is rny understand-ing that this is scheduled for review at the September 26
Planning & Environmental Conrnission meeting. I have owneda condominium unit in Village Center for the last l-0
years, at which we spend half of our time. I am also
President of the Village Center Association which repre-
sents the 56 condominiums in Vi1-lage Center Buildings A,B, and C and the 56 parking spaces in Building D. During
the last 10 years the Village Center Association has
worked hard, in cooperation with the town, to improve the
external attractiveness of the complex. I think there areparts of the proposed devel-opment which are detrimental inparticular to the Village Center Association and in general
to the Town of Vai1. As both an affected owner and as
President of the Village Center Association I would liketo protest this development for the following reasons.
Drawings I have seen in your office indicate the proposed
addition would extend east to within 10 feet of the
Sonnenalp/Village Center property 1ine. I have a copy ofthe rrMap of Village Centerr" obtained from Eagle County,
which was filed the 6th day of December, L972, in Book
226, page 624. This map shows 2 parcels of land that were
deeded to the owners of the Condominiums in Building A.
Parcel 2 is a 15 foot wide strip from the building to
East Meadow Drive. I have shown this map to Dick Ryan
and he has made a copy for your fi1e. If my interpretationis correct and parcel 2 was deeded to Building A and if a
10 foot set back would be required from the edge of parcel 2,
then Hibberdfs proposed buiLding could go no closer to the
property line than 25 feet instead of the 10 feet as he isproposing. This would eliminate virtually all of the
proposed easEward expansion. Our desire is to retain this
area as an open landscaped area maintained by the Village
Center Association.
Mr. Patten
Page 2
I have a drawing from Hibberd Construction Co., dated July
9, L974, which shows what I presume is a storm drain runningjust east of Building D and under the space where he is
proposing to add on to the east. I don't know if this
storm drain actually exists but if it does, are there any
easements or dedications which would prevent that being
built over? Speaking of easements, Holy Cross Electric
recently had to replace the transformer between Village
Center Building A and B. They found that Hibberd had
built the driveway to the lower leve1 of the garage over
their easement and they could not use it. Instead, they
had to bring the replacement transformer in by crane from
the Sonnenalp parking lot over the open sPace we are con-
cerned about. If Hibberd is allowed to build east as
requested how could Holy Cross service this transformer?
The public notice states that this aLteration will be re-
viewed in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design
Guide Plan. Item 1f2L of the East Meadow Drive sub-area
concept addressed this particular location. However, in
1980 you approved the expansion that was called for. Infact, Hibberd was allowed to build more space than spelled
out in the guide plan. The guide plan called for a one
story expansion but you allowed a 2 story expansion in
spite of the fact that the development was considerably
over its allowed G.R.F.A. and the added space was not to
be empl-oyee housing. I think Hibberd has already been
allowed much more than was called for in the guide plan and
should not be allowed to build any more space.
I think one of the reasons that the expansion was approvedin 1980 was because it replaced the unsightly "park" on
top of the garage. That trparkttwas planted and maintained
by Hibberd. However, this additional proposed addition to
the east would eliminate a well maintained landscaped area
which the Village Center Association has taken care of for
the last 1-0 years. During that time we have installed a
sprinkler system, numerous trees, grass and flowers andbuilt crib walls around the sidewalk to control the snowmelt. If Hibberd is allowed to build this addition
virtually all of this will be eliminated. As I read your
Vail Village Design Considerations you are interested in
Keeping open spaces and landscaping. This is an area that
if left to the Village Center Association to maintain will
Mr. Patten
Page 3
always be kept attractive at no expense to the town or to
Hibberd. The only unsightly portion in this Village Center
Association maintained area is the gas meter enctosure. In
this enclosure are the meters for Buildings A, B, C, and D.
The gas company has recently suggested that these meters be
moved over next to Building D's wa1l. If Hibberd were
denied the eastward expansion and the gas meters were moved
they could easily be screened from the public. We would
relandscape that area. Also, we would be happy to cooperate
with the town in any sidewalk across the land between
Sonnenalp and Building D. The Village Center Associationrs
desire is that this area between East Meadow Drive and
Building A remain open and Landscaped. When the Village
Center complex was being originally developed by Fred
Hibberd, drawings rdere approved by the town which defined
where open spaces and landscaped areas would be. It would
appear to me that owners of units in Village Center should
expect that these plans continue to be respected. Where
does the Town of Vail draw the line on allowing developers
to continue to expand?
Expansion of shops and restaurants in Building D creates
additional service and garbage problems. At the present
time service vehicles clog up the Wi11ow Bridge Road
entrance to our parking areas and this will only get worse
I^rith additional expansion. Hibberd should have to provide
a service and drop-off area somewhere other than our
driveway.
I note in reviewing the file folder on this development that
the Vail Fire Department has said that if Hibberd is allowed
to expand this building he should not be allowed to build
any closer than 20 feet to another building. A sprinkler
system, and I presume a ceiling, would have to be installedin both levels of the garage and fire alarms roould have to
be installed in all surrounding buildings. Any cost
associated with these requirements should be paid for by
Hibberd. If the Town of Vail approves this expansion
Hibberd should have to agree to pay for any impact that
this would have on Village Center Buildings A, B, C, and
those ownersr parking spaces l-n Building D.
In summary, I think Hibberd is not legally entitled to build
Mr. Patten
Page 4
any closer than 25 feet from the Sonnenalp /Vittage Center
property l-ine. However, even if that is not so, I thlnk
some of his expansion should not be alLowed because of all
the other reasons I have outlined. It seems to me there
comes a point when the Town of Vail has to say NO to the
developers.
Sincerel-y yours,
Dotson
Union NationlBank & Trust Co.
727 Poyntz Avenue, P.O. Box 1087
Manhattsn, Kansas 66502
Tel€phono 9'131537 -1234
L. W. Stolzer chairman & chief executive officer
September 2, L983
Mr. A. Peter Patten, Jr.
ZonLng Administrator
Town of Vail
Department of Cornnunity DevelopmentVall, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
Ihls l-etter is to ask for your negative recommendation of the
proposal that Mr. Iltbberd is brlnglng to your cotrmittee to again expand
the cormtrercial footage to the east of 122 East Meadow Drive. My wlfe
and I have been owners of Vlllage Center 48 since 1967. In additlon to
this we oLrn three other pieces of property in or around the cJ-ty of
Vall-. One of the naln reasons for us flnally settllng in Vailr rather
than Aspen where we skiied for a number of years, was Val-1 rs attention
to detaLl, partlcularly in zonlng and the use of green space.
When our unit was flrst purchased, the area in questions pl-us the
area to the west, where the last expans ion was made, was all dedicated
green space to be used for a park. ttre were told after the last construc-
tion was under way, that this was done because when the City cl-osed
the street to trafflc they needed additional turnaround space for cars
which Mr. Eibberd deeded to the Clty in return for the zoning variance
to expand.
Now, once agaln, Mr. Hibberd Ls asklng for a varlance whl-ch would take
the last green area on the south side of the street. Further ' I
understand that this i,proPosal is belng considered by your conmlttee
without a conpleted plan. It surPrises me that thls is possl-ble.
Nevertheless, even wl. th the sketchy plans that no\.7 are available one
can see that lf the construction Ls allowed ln the present two story
form it would greatJ.y dininish the value of the condominiums in Buil-dlng
A: Flrst, because of the danaglng effect on the access and vlstas'
and secondly, because of the increased drainage problen whlch is al-ready
having a devastating effect on the lower floor units. It ls tty
irnpress ion from the lncomplete plans that I have been abl-e to obtain
there is even to be comercial space to be located on the south slde
of the lower (garage) floor. This increased foot traffic on a very
narrow resldentlal-type walk as wel"l- as the lack of finish, continued
upkeep, and malntenance which Mr. Hibberd contributes to the less
vlsible sides of hls buildinge w111 certaLnly change the amb iance and
llil
Mr. A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Septenber 2, 1983
Page Two
character of both Bulldlngs A and B, as wel-l as depressing the value of
the lndlvldual condoxdnitrm unlts. (If you question thLs, please view
the back of the last addltion and the parklng garage.)
For these reasons, I an asking for denial of this proposal. Certainly
it should not even be considered wlthout a complete plan and study
addressing the drainage and traffic fl-ow problens that even the
lncomplete proposal whlch ls nonr avallable would suggest. I am a
busLness person myseJ.f and I certaLnly understand the profit motive,but in a quallty envLronment such as Vall, the balance of these,
certalnly must be carefully considered, and hasty decisions will only
have a devastating long tern effect on the entire comunity.
I will not be able to attend the meetlng personally, I have to be in
Washlngton, D.C. that entlre week, and I an asking Mr. Cecil Dotson'
our condominlum presldent to represent I[y lnterests.
Very
ve Officer
cc: Mr. Cec11 Dotson
1lw
C. l.T. Finanrf Gornoration
650 C.l.T. Drlve
L vingston. New Je'sey 07039
201 t40,5286
H. A. lttleson
Execul ve V ce Presicent
August 31, 1983
Mr. A. Peter Patten, !Tr.
Zoning Administrator
Town of Vail
Department of Community DevelopmentVail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
I have just learned of a proposal of a buildi-ngto the north and east of Village Center, BuildingA in Vail . For your information, I have been an
owner in the Village Center complex for a numberof years and over the past approximately fouryears in Building A. As such, I have watched
developments around this complex change thenature of the condominiums and while not objectingin writing, have not seen a benefit to either the
condominium owners or to the town of Vail . Quiteto the contrary, the Village Center buildingshave an ambience and character which has allowed
them to appreciate in value and be recognized asboth architecturally fitting into the Vailenvironment and being run in a superb manner.
The ViIIage of Vail has obviously changeddramatically over the years and there's mostrecently been a large amount of shops andrestaurants springing up everywhere. It should
be noted that many of these fail after only one
season because the cost of building is sogreat that the rents simply cannot be met to
increase competition within the villaqe limits.
Mr. A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Page 2
August 31, 1983
From the other side, condorninium values have
continued to appreciate and the Village Center
buildings are now of a premium qual-ity and
would be badly damaged by additional structures
which would destroy vistas.
While my family and I spend a considerable
amount of time in Vail, we do not rent our
apartment and are not there on a daily basis.For that reason, I am giving my Proxy toMr. Cecil Dotson, President of the Village
Center Association to act on my behalf J-n any
meetings which take place regarding this new
proposal .
I will appreciate your consideration to thethoughts expressed in this letter and hope thatthe tor'irn of Vail will not approve anotherbuildino in this site.
Very truly yours,,
HAI/cap
DOUGLAS P BEEDON, D.D.S,, M.S.O
CHAFTERED
PRAcflqE LtMtTEo To ERTHoDoNTtcE
I79O NORTH LEXINETON AVENUS
ROSEVILLE, MINNEStrTA 55I'I3
oFFrcE PHoNEi 4gs-2a44
Septenber L2t L983
Ilovm of Vail
Oepartnenf of Comrnity DevelopentA. Peter Patten, Jr., Zodlg Artninistrator
Vai1, Oolorado 81557
Re: Prcposed Changes
Dear !tr. Patten:
Dorglas P. and Narclt K. Beedor, cfi,{Ilers of un:it 1D, Buildjng B, Village
Cent€r, wistr to record tleir otr4nsition to tlre proposed changes to
Village Center Building D, and the subsequerrt loss of open gteen q)ace.
cc: Cecil P. Dotson, P:esidsrt
Village Center Association
LTIED Allisd Corporation
P O. Box 3000R
f,4ornslown, New JerEey 07960
? *' t'' r*
Jame8 L, Vincenl
Group vr.ie presrdent AuguSt 23, 1983
Mr. A, Peter Patten, Jr.
Zoning Adminjstrator
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
Vail , Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
I am currently, and have been for approximately 5 years, an ownerof a unit in Building A, Village Center. I have just been advisedof the proposal that is being brought before the committee by Mr.
Hibberd to add, among other things, some type of structure on the
east end of 122 East Meadow Drive.
I want to enter a strong objection to any proposal that is goingto change either the vista or access to the Vil'l age Center Condominiums
north of Building A. I think it is quite apparent to anyone who standsat the back of Vfllage Center Building A, that if a structure is built
east of what is currently standing it would fundamentally change the
ambiance and character of those current buildings.
I am a'l so told this proposal is being made even bitore a completeplan is submitted for the entire project and, even without that,
interested parties are asked for their comments. I think that is
ri d i cu'l ous .
Given the current avaj'l abil ity of both restaurants and retail
shops in Vail Vi'l lage and within close proxim'i ty to this site, I don't
understand why anyone would consider it prudent to damage the val ueof $500,000 condominiums for another retail shop or restaurant.
Besides, we have recently allowed two additional restaurants and
some retail shops to be built on the east end of the same build'i ng.
Why isnrt that enough?
Si ncereJ y,
/:(!,(,"(:'**',
P. S. Since I will be generaily unavailable for any meeting you have
on this subject, I have asked l4r. Cecil Dotson, our condominiumpresident, to represent me.
Septerber 14, 1983
I4r. A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Tf/rlu-ng Artnlnistrator
IOVnOT Var-r
DeDartrent of Corrnnirv DevelopnrentVail, Colorado 81657
Dear l,lr. Patten:
We are ovners of a Village Center lkrit. I'le would ljke to state
or:r objectives to the dranges to Village C,;enEer Building D.
IrIe thirk sorrE open area nnrst be rnaintailed to prowide a feelingof a resorL atnosphere and a nice plaee to stay in o-r willage corolex.If allqoed to build solid it becqes a city feeling and appearance.
the rpre businesses Ltr,at are established in Building D r,atren ercpanded
rinl<e it possible for nrcre people to trespass and be on our Village CsLtercorplor. l'{ainafning parking spots becdnes rpre of a problern as IIDre
ccn:Trercial pl-aces are added and rhey par& in or-r corpler pad<ing 1ot.
At otrc entrance a problern is created riglrt ncru with fteigltt trudcs srd
utility and rraintenance vetricles. lhis prcblern will only beccrne worse
with added br:sinesses in Building D.
We qr:estion can tlrey lega1ly build tJre proposed addition? We hope you
will- consider or:r desires lo keep ttris a ni-ce area and not overcrouzfud
and say No to tJ:e developers. 0r.r area ls nice, Hrlry can't we l-.eep it ttrat
way?
Respectfu1ly,
/^' ,
cYen,-f,
Gary L. McDaniel
O{:vnCC: Dtr. Cecil Dotson
RODGER DROEL
1690 TAKE JOHANNA BIVD.
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 551]2
September 13, 1983
A. Peter Patten, Jr., Zoning Administrator
Town of VailDept. of Community DeveLopmentVail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Patten,
I am writing in regard to the changes Fred Hibberd proposes forVillage Center Building D. I have owned a unit in Village Centerfor the past 9 years. I an unable to attend the meetingscheduled for September 26, but I want to voice my objections tothe changes proposed.
One of the attractions of Vail in general, and Village Center inparticular, has always been the beautifully-maintained greenspaces. The VilJ.age Center Association has, over the years, madethe area in question very attrative with plantings, grass, andtrees. Having paid for this green area, I am doubly upsetabout losing it.
I al.so object to the idea of having yet more commercial andrestaurant space so close to our buildings. As it is, the pizzaparlor is a definite nuisance, with ear-splitting rock music atall hours--and that is on the other side of the existing
conmercial bui lding.
A final .objection: the proposed addition would limit access tothe backs of the present buildings. This would certainly be aninconvenience, and in the event of fire possibly a danger as
we11.
I hope that you and the Planning & Environnental Commision willreject the proposed development.
Since re 1y,
€"+Pr--.|
Rodger DroeLBuilding C, Unit lJ
Fned L. Ahenn
756 South Third Street / Post Office Box 50099 / Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250 / Q04J 24I-4355
I3 September 1983
A. Peter Patten, Jt., Zoning Administrator
Town of Vail
Department of Community Development
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
I am the owner of Unit 2E, Building B at Village Center. I am
writing to Protest Fred Hibberd's application for adding two
1evelJ of ietail and restaurant space on the north side of
Building A, East Meadow Drive.
One of the attractions of Vail in the spring and sumrner is the
beautiful landscaping in the area. when we purchased the unit
approximately ten-yeirs ago it was our impression that this area
woura remain landscaped as it presently is. This is maintained
by the Village Center Association. In addition, I feel the
d-ensity of this building is sufficient and any additional density
would not be in keeping with the area.
I would appreciate the Town of vail taking the necessary action
to prevent this zoning.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Very yours,
FLA/j cd
cc: Cecil P. Dotson
truly
Ahern
INVESTOR / REALTOR / DEVELOPER
A<
September 19, 1983
A. Peter Patten, Jr.
Zoning Administrator
Town of VailDept. of Community DevelopmentVail, Colorado 81657
Re: Rezoning Application of Fred HibberdVillage Center Building D
Gentlemen:
I am the o\dner of Unit 3H. Village Center, and am thereforevery concerned about the proposed zoning amendment to allowadditional development on the above captioned building.Specifically, I object to continually increasing the
allowable square footage to be developed on Mr. Hibberdrsparcel in what has become a random manner utilizing allof the available land that he has in his parcel . When
the Town of Vail approved building D, specific areas wereretained for open space above the parking structure.Obviously, after a long period of time Mr. Hibberd was
allowed to increase the density on the parcel by removingthe park setting and building additional ret.ail footage.
Now you are being asked to allow additional development toinclude what remaining greenbelt is available on thisparcel in order to further increase its ultimate density.I musL strongly object to this change being allowed as not
only does it take away the last amount of greenbelt available
along the entire frontage of the parcel, but would in fact
create additional noise for the residents of Village Centerbuildings A, B and C due to additional restaurant space
being permitted. As a specific example, the door to LaTourrestaurantst kitchen is J-eft open for ventilation purposes
weLl after closing in the early morning hours. This
certai-nly has given an atmosphere of an alleyway Lo thoseof us who live behind building D.
AMBROSE . KORNFELD . KOSLOSKY i16s souTH pENNsyLVANTA STREFT. DENVER. coLoRADo 802,10.303/777-03s6
a
To\rn of Vail
Septenber 19, 1983
Page two
For the
request
IHK:df
cc: Cecil Dotson
above reasong, I stronglybe denied. Thank you inati6ffiny concerns.
urge that Mr. Hibberd's
advance for your
ge Centen
IIUTIHITAIICI\IAL gECI.HTY C]OIIFGNAIt|J{
tW NOFTH KEN' STRF€I . /qAt/NGION. VtRGtNtA22209 . (703)s27.614o
Septetriber 13, l-983
Tcrn of VaiL
Depar tment of Comnunl-ty DevelopmentA. Peter Patten, Jr.
ZorLi'ng Adninistrator
Vai1, Colorado 81657
GentLenen:
I would ltke to register ny strong objections to the proposed additionto Building D, Village Genter.
I feel that an additLon such as that being proposed in Mr. Fred Hibberdtsapplication would adversely effect the qualify of life we nolv enjo)' at
Vil-Lage Center. AddttlonaI buildtng density and corrnercLaL development
would bring \"ri th it, noise and additlonaL congestLon. I'lany of us who
oliln ptoperty in Village Center, come to VaiL Just to get away fronr thissort of thtng.
Very tnrly yours,
LNTERSEC, IN,C.
John
JElrp
cc: Cecit P. Dotson
TER A. FRANK
SOUTH CIRCLE DRIVE
NECK, L. I., N. Y. IIO2I
(516) 482-8053
.,ep l9 1933
lovm of i/ail
uept of Coininunity )eveloprnent
:r. FeLer Patten, Jr. Zoning .rdrninistratorUail Colorado i1657
f,e aoolicatiilon of iir. Eredilibb;ld r s oroDosed ciran :esto )31C3 , ;f village Ceiter
Dear iir:I am the o\.mer of Villa;e aenter Bldg li;\pt 2 D.It iras coine to fiU/ atEention of the irroposal of ;.lr..iibberd to add tlvolevels of reLail and -lestaurant spaces Lo iiuilding J, and L wish to protest
i nrlaa.{
As you know, lor nrany years, we the Village Center associatlon have maintainedthe landscaped area, with grass and treas, insEalLed sprinkler systemsrforthe enhancement of the overall beautv of the ViLla:e of VaiL. To lookthe enhancement of the overall beauty of the Village of VaiL. To lookach this open landscape is indeed a beautiful sight, which not only enhancesach this open landscape is indeed a ful sight, which not of Ehe Villa:e of Vail.the area, but overall, adds to the charm of Ehe Vil
<
WAL
SEVBN
GREAT
I feel, that if permisslon were ;ranted Eo add two levels of retail andrestaurant spaces to the existing building, which only recently underr'ientextensive alter4ioqs and additionn, by adding not only retailspeeeax, butalso a restauranc|tswhich in the so**.-rti*e iE , to sa! ttre least, an annoyancewiEh the consEanE going and coming on Willoughbridge itoad, from the ironstatrcase to Ehe storage spece on the Lower Level, and last buL not Least,
we who have our own parking spaces are conscantly boLhered by intruders whlchpark their cars in our spaces, knowing full well, that unfortunately thePolbce DaprtmenE cannoL enter the garage on the lower level to remove illegal-ly parked cars, but rnerel-y Lo issue a 5.00 parking ticket, and for $ 5.00to park for a week !n someone elses space is indeed a cheap way of parking.
The addition of the two levels is definitely not in the interesL of Vil"lageCenter Buildings A B + C, but I would say neither in the interest of theVillage of Vail. I thus trust thaE the application of additional twol Levelswill be denied.
tkLe To,trt-s wAL'ltEit,
fr#{ +'vcr}rnt f
(-
Iv L
-*
3301 Prirpetor
Dallas, ltexas 75205
15 Septenber 1983
Town of Vail
Department of Ccrmnunity Develofnent
A. Peter Patten, Jr.,
Zoning Adninistrator
Vai1, Colorado 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
I ant currenU-y, and have been for approximatel-y 5 years, the olrner ofunit 18 in Building A, Village Center. we harre been advised of the
proposal that is being brought before the ccrmnittee by Mr. Fred
Hibberd to exterd Building D between the north side of Buildirry A and
Ilast Meadc'ht Drive.
Presently there is a 30 to 45 fot wide landscaped area in this place.
Drrirg the last 10 years the Village Center Assciaticn has maintaired
this area, installed a sprinkler systern' planted trees' grass and
flcners ard built crib walls arourd the sidewalk to qcntrol the sncnrlelt. Mr. Hibberd is proposing to add two levels of retail and
restaurant spae where ttris open lardscaped area presently exists' andwill create an unsightly close&in effect for Village Center
residents.
I believe this is a very clear case of an attenpt to destroy thequality of a ccrpletely derreloped area by overdevelc4ment. I strongl-y
object to ttris and reqr:est that ttre Ccnmissicn reject Mr. Hibberd'sproposal.
ViltilS:an
@: Mr. Cecil P. Dotsdr
very/ truly you#,/ll
ft,utA*(
Willian l{. sic\--
' .t'1'l4ay 23,
APPLICATION FORM FOR
EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE II (CCII)
VAIL LIONSHEAD
This procedure required for alteration of an existing building which
adds or removes any enclosed floor axea or outdoor patio or replace-
ment of an existing building sha1l be subject to review by the Plan-ning and Environmental Comrnission.
The application will not be accepted until all inforflration is submitted.
I. NA.}18 OF APPLICAT',IT Fred Hibbard
I.
!,pptlf,gg 1977 South Park Rt., Jackson, Wyoming 83001 PHONE (307)733-7327
2.NADIE OF APPLICA!{TrS REPRESENTATM Bal-dwin Associates Architects. Inc.
ADDRESS 1000 South Frontage Road, lJesr, Vall, CO 81657PHONE (303)476-4433
3. NAME 0F 0!'INER (print or type)Fred llibbard
SIGNA
ADDPJ,SS /477 ,*cr/z t&z-,(H.7ct* ..,sa PHONE 7.33- >3>)
6"3G<r'/
4. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDRESS: I22 E. Meadow Drive, Vail, CO 81657
TEGAL DESCRIpTION a part of tract C, a part of Lot K, Blk 5E, V.V. lst
I
flUS. FEE $1O0.OO plus an anount equal to the then current first-class posrageV,/ rate for each property owner to be notified herermder.
6. Improvement survey of property showi-ng property lines and locationof building and any improvements on the land.
7. A list of the name of owners of all property adjacent to thesubject property and their f'lAILING addresses.
II . Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following i-nformation:
A. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24t' x 35" at ascale of l" = 20'; a variation of the sheet or scale may be ap-proved by the Community Development Department if justified;
B. The date, north arrow, scale and name of the proPosed development
shall be shown on the site plan;
l\a'lffi ;H:::3 ;:3fi:1",;13':::::.?:"'*'::.;";:"::13,:xi"::tnan expansion area where there is a change of two feet of grade;
The location and size of all existing and proposed buildings,structures and improvements;
The existing and proposed. landscaping patio additions or deletions.
III. The applicant shall submit in written and graphic form, a preponder-ance of evidence before the Planning and Environmental Corunisiionthat the proposal is in conformance with the purposes of the CCIIDistrict and that the proposal substantially Lompfies with the VaiILionshead Urban Design Guid,e plan.
A. rf the applicant is proposing a major change to the VaiI Lionsheadurban Design Guid.e plan, the proced.ures foi change are noted inSection I8.24.22O (B).
fV. The applicant must also submit written and graphic supporting mater-ials that the proposal substantially compli6s witn tnE-followingUrbal Design Considerations section of the Vail Lionshead oesigiConsiderations.
A. Height and. Massing.B. Roofs'C. Facades - Wa1ls/Structure.D. Facades - TransparencyE. Decks and patios.
F. Accent Elements.G. Landscape Elements.
' Many of the above items should be addressed in some graphic meansusing such tools as sketches, simulations, models (iiclirajlg neigh-boring buildings), photos, etc.
D.
E.
v.The Town of Vail Zoning Code for CCII also describesissues that the applicant must respond to in writtenform.
other zoningor graphic
VI . Applications for exterior alterations or modifications in CCIr canbe received up to lTuly 3l-, 1990. After that date, the time framesnoted in Section 18.24.0G5-A-5 app1y.
List of Materials
NAME 0F PR0JECT: Villaqe Center ImprovementsPart of Tract C and
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT K BL0CK 5-E FILING Vail Villaqe lst Filinq
DESCRIPTI0N 0F PR0JECT: Conmercial addition. storefront expansion'
The following information is required for submittal by the applicant to the
Design Review Board before a final approval can be given:
A.BUILDING MATERIALS Type of MaterialBuilt-up roof w,/grevel
( slop in9 )
Rubber membrane w,/gravel
( frat )
ColorTo match existing
To match existing
Roo f
Siding
0ther Wall Meterials
F asci a
5o ffits
Hindow Trim
Doors
FLues
Fl ashing e
C himneys
Trash Enclosures
Greenhouses
0ther
N/A White to
Door Trim Natural wood To matcJr e1ls'N!49--
l,Hend or Deck Reils0tlrlrtf{llA-rr4Ft reilinq match window trim
Stueco match existinqMixed color - see
Stone (at retaininq wall) photo for color,/tvpe
To match existing
Itlood siding ( Cabots(at shop expansions) Ott4-Ott5)
siding (Cabots
T&Gllood 0lJ4-0115)
Dark brown to matchexisting (0lympic
l{ood 0xford Brownatural wooqlass (new)To metch existinq
N /,t
Sheet metal match existinq
N/A
hi te o
Stucco match existinq
N/A
Skyliehts - curb mounted, clear doned
sidewalk and Landscaoino redevelopment. visual screen wal1 additions.
plexiqlass
B. LANDSCAPING
Name of Designer: Rick Baldwin
Phone t 476-443i
PLANT MATERIALS
TREES Populus
Tremulo ides possible to maturity - supplemental or
Botanical Name Common Name Quantitv Size
Asoen - existino trees to be reused where
SHRUBS
G ROUND
c0vERs
replacement trees
Picea EnqLemanni Enqlemann Spruce 5 6r hiqh
Picea Enqlemanni Enqlemann Spruce 5 8 - 10r hiqh
SQUARE FOOTAGE
c.0THER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimming pools,etc.) Pl.ease specify.
o Retaininq wall faced with mixed color stone with dry laid appearance.
(See photos).
o Visual acreen walls** - concrete block (sinqle score ainted wh ite
to match existino oaint coIor. Glass block cLear Decora ) .Meta I
reinforcino. bracino. eao oiece. oainted white to match block
color.
o Pevinq for walkway - Interlockinq pavers over concrete base.
** SCREEN TIALL MATERIALS AND LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY OI{NER. IF
CHANGED, SUBMITTAL I{ILL BE MADE T0 To}{N 0F VArL STAFF FoR APPRoVAL 0R
TO DESIGN REVIE}{ BOARD UPON STAFF RECOMMENDATION. FOR APPROVAL.
s0D
SEED
Yes SQUA
SQUARE FOOTAGE
00TAGE ApproximateLv
4,150 sq. ft.
a
REF
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
TYPE OR
METHOD OF
EROSION
CONTROL
,7
o
SC
Qi naa:.a'lrrr:q!b,
RI O INVESTMENT CO NYtolecr" box 1r2
ltrelr r',aclrid1 lEg1gecdMtssouRr 6aaz4
,,r. Ji-:n Sa;nce
Departnent of Co:nrunity developnent
Veilr Co. 81{.5r
o
MPA
Deal: .,..rr. Se,l.re :
In anst.rer to your letter dated rtarch l5r in r,/oich ;rcu ask me to outl-ine
ny concern about the parking situationl f r'rould U-ke to s;ry the follolaing.
ry parking place is situated in the rear of the parking erea in building D
of the Village Center Condord.niurns, op.oosite frora Ie Touris refri-geration and
food storage, 2]i. For the last b roonth, rnany tfunes it nas not possible for
ne to get in or out of ngr parking pl-ace because the center entrance isl-e lras
bl-oclced by cars of peaple ',lho riork or live upstairs i.ii titat builCing. AJ.so
I have taken atnrse of those peoplernritten and verbal-. Car'ai-th l-icence plate
ty 951+6 t/ai1 pushed r[r car in locked and. parked position, from one place to
an other.
the peopl-e trho have rented -uhe converted gariclng places on the same fJ-oor,
continious\r plug up the entrance isle to load ancl unload s:np1ies.
One renter of such converted parldngplace chased rne ort of the isl-e because
r{f car stalled in front of his place at eight oicloci: at night, cornpl-aining
r creaied s:noke in his r'rorkshopAiuingquar'uers (?7. l.nd so r can go on and on.
Several of the other condo,rLiniurn or..al€ps have siruilar cornolainis.
At ihis point T r,rant to lmow'urhy the city has all-owed or given 'rr, Hibberb
the right to convert ttrose parlclng olaces into private businesses. I do
ruderstand thai if nr. I{ibbert has acted r,rithin his rights, r have to tal.-e
the :natter to court on an indivri.&ral basls. Sowever, I an sure ihat iflrou
are going back to the orlginal- buildin6 prrrn:it of bui3-di-ng D, lrou i,rill_ see
tJrat ttris floor r'ras set aside for parlci-ng on1y. I expect the ciiy to enforce
the coderif :rg,' assr:-:nption is eorrect.
Prle|$cRtsha{p
rlprtl 1L, L9o2
Joe Bader
',,M
17 t4tr-$t/a",ry
APPITICATION IiORM FOR
ce$ffirrolq-Ar usir PERM.TT 4'r'{*
I.This prclcedure is require<l for any project required to obtain a
Conditional Use Permit.
The appl.ication wi1.l not be acceptecl until all inforrnation is
submitted.
A. NAME oF AppLrcANr Vtuj6€ C€r.l{e{,. L$crA(.oJ
D.
(7,2 //* C (<,2^-<-.<-,-/
//; <'*r",'.u-'o--..--
(r**;r* (o-L-
^*/1"'- /*.'* n//
-/7, -*--- t-t -z-<-1 f't*
/1 a*"-.-
'U o"-7 ( <r.t'<.
ADDREss- lut--!D-r.-o.^r ?g,oea%u.t- pnoNuht-r'{zr--
B. N:\MU OF APPLTCANF S REPI(ISENTATTVE-T-$O}IAa-6..AIrS-I&EOd_-
ADDITESS PHOr.iH q1b-11,01
C. AUTHORIZATION Ol- PROPITRTY OI\NER
SIGNATURE '-,,/-,
.3..3
xoumss- 7zr /1.-a.i--^ r?"./ zzc- HaNE 87'"'a1)/--
I,OCATION OF PROPOSAL
ADDR]]SS I?.
LEGA]-, DEscRrr)rroN-L"ff-L--$esft-Eq- rilrljs Vh- Jr".-de" Fa.<
FEE $50.00 plus lB+ for each property owner to be notified,
A list of the name of owners of all property adjacenL to the
subject property and their addresse-s,
.r.
'//. ('=/12411 <- 4^J' 1//rnr-,lr-_S ...,_-
(2..(t,2a (nJ.- 2 ,4,.,-t{---t J -.-^- =.<* (2,--*.--;l h 6-c.QQo*-.:.,7
/a-22 ,;,/<-"-.uo € ,z Y s- -<a tt! Y 1"
' -Y/ .t ./('--24.1.| . cfu, *--< - ,/ /,- . .t_; re-k ,t -<., .. ,---.Y /4 ( LL*-p 4/,"G--<.rs_// / t/
)- x..-,t---Y ( .-Q'n lQ
,-u../4- c-..-,-.-..J --4)4
-4-*,7 -4a..'<-.<- -
(,U u-t.a
-29.-_,-,-"-.-G/-
-;/".-,"'2<-t4-r
c"-7r<_
In the Municipol Courl in ond for lhe /Town of Voil l .t
ond the Stole.ol Colorodo I
5un.,;n.;r,u"j on ADril 2. 1982
co..lprainrrir"don March 2. 3. l98Z
Amotrnt oi Bond $ ' Tytre
--
Name "f Surety {il any)
People Of The Slatc Ol Q,lorndo
I homas G. Atchi son Il Ie",l
tt \/-hml/l1_t rl llfer v' Jvrnt'ru!
Private Complajnant: A. Peter Patten,
Nl 699, Nl 700
r.l{9 4646
su...n, xo.-Nf05Z-N-L€5.3- First Appea"ncc
C.ntinued to
C-ontinue.l Io
Trial I);rte
De fen,lanl s Atk)rney:Crnlinucd to
(i)ntinuod to
Stnv Crflrled
(hsll ()"s,:,1:
.,l^ HRSI APPEARANCE /!.
Delenrtant w:s trcfrrre rhe o,urt.n "ilV .to 6l- . *ilt 'u, c.uu.er
Delcndant *ni rpprised (,1 hr5 rir,hls, ^dvis€d o[ lhe naturc ol lhe oflense. ind lhe possible grualti"r. /':
L.l';1i,i srjlaina permit @ )ifU-th:ls-o-4q-0tdT:lr tl\O bUIIOIIl9 P€fl]llr,2@
' CHARGES. PICAS AND PnOCEEDINGS I
d {irhhis(,,,nw.r x
,r,rr,.!-gk.',
_3tu_
Ju,lrrr
O'1
TRIAI'
, l$- . l)(:lendlot. Irv nn.l wilh ().^rnsel t l . Pr. rc L-.1
'frial r as fiell;
a'r(l "lbs n .\ll )rr,at.
I)eprrty lrrrx:ire(l re:rdy lo. tri:rl.
Aflet (nnt;dcrins the lest;mony add other evi.lcoce. the Ci,urt.lJury I,runrl the I)efendaol
.rnd imtrrs<.rl the l,)!lr){ inq e nr.
/)n* r rr,, il\t'
t:l,rrc, "l. C1 UU.-" r.,rt".'r,r" r
ch,.r. .t ? do. d ,,"r,(.,,,.,1
Ch:rr!t ?1n aO
l<n (,n
I v \-r.
20 0. oo
l?< 'o _
J50. oo
.l \11.-_5-{(:hirse
(:hlr(e
(;hnrc{l
5
Stiv,'i F:,:(rtri.'n l.r.lllin1 lo
.3
F l_ l_s AND (i( )s]s
s
l! l.r'l ,l ,.1., ii
PNOBATION
learr'r,f th,' (),Lrrt t,,.,1,1r'r f:,' i,r, l,.'1,.',' \l.,li,,n {.i ,r,'l
I i ll, "i .r 'r"'.,: . r'. ! i,t
Best
copY
Available
Sheri{i
Ju rv
O. rl
T('-t".\I-
$
-t
I',\I|)-_l)ite
\
(rrc('l',scd on th.
,-r'
-box 1 )
vail, colorado 81657
(3O3) 475.s613
department of community development
June 20, tr980
TO:
FR0lvl:
SUBJECT:
MEMOMNDUM
Roo SltrrR, MAYoR
Fneo HIBBARD
Drcr Rveru
VrluesE CEnreR GnnRers
Oru WrorurwDAY, JuNE 16, 1980, FREo HtssARD AN'D I
WE'T THRoueH numoSl nll THE GARAGES AT THE VILLAGE
Cenien.' -AiL ine GARAGES I^tnsprcrED coulD I-LAVF 4inn'FnnfrD IN THE-speCe, SoNE GARAGES HAD SToRAGE
nlone rHE sIDE AND REAR wALLS AND t,loulD HAVE suF-
FICIENT AREA FOR A PARKED CAR.
oI
Jurur 20, L980
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
GFtt .r] tatt
rt*(j* d
IVIEMOMNDUM
Roo SltrER, MAYoR
FReo HlssRRn
Drcr Rven
Vrt-ueg CrrutER GnRRers
Oru WrnruEwDAy/ JUNE 16, 1980, FnEo HTBBARD AND I
WEST THRoUGH ALMoST ALL THE GARAGES AT THE VILLAGECenreR, ALL tHe oRRReEs I INSpEcTED coulD HAVE A
CAR PARKED IN THE SPACE. SOME GARAGES HAD STORAGE
ALONG THE SIDE AND REAR WALLS AND WOULD HAVE SUF-FICIENT AREA FOR A PARKED CAR.
I,, '
t,
F"-hi'{i
lir\';I t,f tiilillr
box 100 dcpar tnrcnt of conrntunity <lcvcloprrrcnt
w,il, colorado b1G57
(3031 476.s613
l{ov,.,l>--r 20, 1979
Jay K. Peterson
llox 3149Vail, CO 81657
Re: Hitberd Parking Violatiqr irr Village Center
Dcar Jay:
I trave inryected the garages at t).e village Cen{:er auilding
and find tlem to be in curpliance with vrtrat was stipulatedin tJre Corrt heariag. f, therefore, request that the
ccnplaint against l'.tr. Hibberd be formally disnissed.
Siacerely,
.'l A ,1
fi-4 n-"-r,;l . (i :'{..', ;-
[. Jatres A. Rulcin
Senior Planner
oc: Iarrl/ Eskwith
oo
!s
VILLACE CENTER ASSOCIATION
P. O. BOX . VAIL. COLORADO
T*e* $ 4rg'f,Je A*<tge*w clrrUlrt urtt\c$ t *rootolfo
Ug-gt$ trllo T*€ C€rurl(r { \,$A(r.€,.
ke{ fbc- | Drrrocor To (rmar, k g.
Cl,o{s{ ro 0t Slr4i1gry,; Vg- 6"" Cr*l^;-^
('lr
I
I
I
tl
rJ
I
I
I
I
n
- -'t
I
I
I
$l\l
;l
$rdr
I
I
I
I
wl
VILLACE CENTER ASSOCIATION
P. O. BOX 187 .VAIL. COLORADO arosa
March L6, L982
Memo to: Town of Vail
From: Cecil Dotson, PresidentVillage Center Association
The Board of Directors of the Village Center Association
approved Tom Atchison & Co. as the managing agent for our
common elements approximately one yeat a9o. The Village
Center Association is a complex of buil-dings including 56
condomlniums and parking spaces. At the time Tom Atchison
was hired as our managing agent we encouraged him to develop
an office as close as possible to Vil-l-age Center and hopefuLly
on the site.
Our Associati-on has been very pleased with the overall
performance of Tom Atchison and extended his contract for
the next year. The board and all of the other owners have
been particularly pleased with Tom's efforts to develop an
office at the entrance to our site. The physical location
i-s particularly important in convenience to the owners ' access
ibility of service people and providing security to the
slte.
hle would Like for you to know that we support Tomr s efforts
as managlng agent to provide this office for our Association.
VIL
b
I.AGE CENTER
3/ 4/82 1:00 p.m.
-- Visit by Peter Jamar, Peter Patten, Jim Sayre-- Discovery of office in 2 main level parking sta11s-- Door 'locked, knocked, we were 1et into an office-- Saw Tom Atchjson (who previously inquired about converting
spaces to office and was informed of procedures involved to
do such)
t,|e informed him that this was an i11ega1 use of the space andthat it was in vio'lation of zoning and bui'ld'ing codes. l^le again
informed him of the proper procedures to be followed in order to
convert the space.-- In Office--3 desks, 2 other peop'le
--Cons'iderable in and out traffic while we were there
--Real estate jnfo on desks (applications, mult'ip'le listings, etc.)-- Tom Atchison told us he had a real estate broker's'l icense and wou'ldnot operate a real estate busjness out of the space jn future butdid not say whether he current'ly was or not-- Phone was answered this morning when Peter Patten called as
Atchison and Company -- not as Vi'l lage Center Condominium Management
Offi ce-- Sign on door ways Village Center Association Managernent 0ffice-- 476-742I (same phone # as Atchison & Company listed in phone book)
1:45 p.m.
-- Building owner notified (Fred Hibberd) and space red-tagged for
non-compliance with zoning regulations and building code vio'lations.
No one wou'ld answer door upon knocking - I then returned to theoffice and called Mr. Atchison - a recording device took my messagefor him to return my ca1 'l at the Town.
(
,'i
Pl anner .,/,4 r2^--..= /// -r€---7--.----.-
Pl anner"'-
/
t..
l,':\-
Iri;n ri
box 100
,,( \
iruV
. vail, colorrdo
REN EI,]AL
I,,ICENSE YEAR
E1t,57
.
APPLICATION I:,.,;ll(required undcr
BUSINISS LICINSE
Ordi Itltnce 1-76 )
1982
NA]\IE OF
}'iAILIi.IG
ACUTAL
25.00 fee for each lace of business muE!-4stem lication:
BUSINESS Atchison & telP3l
"331;?3i-the building)
BUSINESS PHONE NU}'IBER 47 6-'t 42r STATE SALES TAX NU}IBEfr N/A
LOCAL I{ANAGER.S NA}IE Thomas G. Atchison.M-AILING ADDRESSBox 1175, vai l
HOIJE PITONE 416-7209 RESIDEi.ICE ADDRESS S
NU}'IBER OF EITIPLOYEES
TYPE OF BUSII'IESS:
( Summer )(rvint er )
Retail Sales (sPecifY)
Restauran t lBarLodgingProfessionar(specifY) Real Estate sales
Service (specify type) Propertv Management
Total Area Occupied by Business 360 . square feet'
IN:DICATE TYPE OF O\\'NEP.SHIP:PartnershiP.- CorPoration XXIndividual
PIiONELIST PARTNERS OF CORPORATE OFFICERS/TITLE ADDRESS
Thomas c. Atchison. P. o .R,.* 11-6, i--il, r-o 476-7421 - Pres/Sec'
James E. Atchison, 429? Ridoe Dr., Pittsburq' CA 94565 \7 p' Tres
LI ST OIINER ' S ADDRESS mai 1in & Residence and PHOI{E NUI{BER:
PLEASE IIiDICATE: NEIf BUSINESS
LIST ANY -ADDITIONAL BUSIi\'ESS LOCATIONS
OUTSIDE THE CITY LITIITS:
EXISTING BUSINESS
ForrnerlY OPerated by r Atchison&
9pmPery---..-
IN VAIL AND ANY BRANCH orrtcss Loc;TED
.AI)])LICAT
OPiN l;r*G
A
I)n.nV
v
ION
DH I
J
DATE
LUT BUS I NtiSS Novemb r 198
(SIGNED)
TITLT
.-. rmas G. Atchison- lraqi rlanl-
LICTIISE ; - .----- ISSUED-
l:otr ()l'1.'l('tAL tlsit 0Nl,Y:- -'-----
llr:,ll,'l'il zoN I NG
l',|111 Appl ic:rt1on lo:
l'orvrr Ci irr'l<, Ttltvtt rr'l' V:r r I
l).O. tlt))i lO0, \litl l, (l'r lil(iii'/
I
I
I
hll I r'l !N(i(il(:'i)-
TRADE NAH
oO
4r'ftzrtrn! cfit {
Vt m ,q71a",/ s
C<-Z ar.<.-
+ 'l'?"*r
-J -?'7'.-t1€
-"-/oA- "' ,*,-y' ^ n -,-;*,2av'c+<&flzq/
/. /f. oz. ogo rl r*c tcA fi1 L / rj
ZnoWhez- **u*/7,
Tftw*1 ls rJ co4tv(tutAu crrzEf
9 Vtt*,\ae cAlreK
1t."0 a^a 7erm,tl"4 * c-'*"(; +;J Uf.s
,,ttt'' - tLu, >.Ja ,]u'!u !t-l Lr''-s [".
t/* 5a^-t a5 Q t a-rL +"7* i)'tll;t
/t.z/. pg, 4rutoorZ L./.s
'-p. " 6'C/".- (t/t1/-2 ,.r*r/"-r^-'-:4 ;L"L;fr1 *af
L . l,<
/fz4r?r24 f7 Uxa--*f-n il- h1.r*4--'I
"iyJ.-r.t-r!-ar* "-t,-f /?/,Za-A-. + / fu
Lt4n-/xr-.c2/u-a1 *, f/4-- W/6t (+le4'*.fl i f,r.J aC t +.,
"a4a4'{
C4/'e4 ryt 1 ' '-*' l-"L r5%t?:.;;4 rt uad*-.t/,-.,+u^.1 >?pa-<t- k/,-n or^4 >Yd 4 .,**-.-;*r*H iH).
6"./ ,.-,J o /'4 -o-/"^a' ffin-, 6 iLt
tL-zL /'\ C4 o- Cc-? ,
oo
bt.7** /h",^{
."t/rVLr-A - /?
r/.2/ /La,i
C *;Az;,^- d? r.cfibL, e, @
@-_ 177?
' JZIZ;=.: t{.o{aro
'c-^'rtd-/ UL.0
-z&+
H---
//l/
rn#ctoN neouisrTOWN OF VAIL
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
CALLEB
TUES WED THURFEADY FOR
LOCATION:
REQUIRED
oa're ti'-2 S- ^ tz rNsPEcroR
laJ
Untt I
s
v
4zc -./5"(:;ffi*,-'- L.t T,',a
IJl{ ASSOCIATIONWCORE /7?7- y' 2s r 1 vt,
John & L{nda l'ltrlte
700 Earbor-Drive
Key BlacaYqe, Florlda 33149
1305 DuFossat
:e-ge!_h_q-gelglc--U-' Kashner "-
22L HeeE TroPlcal WaY
Plantatloo, Florlda 33317
Hr. Sheldoo JosPeY
c/o B. Stertart
3433 W. 218th St.
llatteson, I11. 60443
iil"illli:i'Lo,r1"1.r," 70115 s>o7 ' ttJs vatt <- ?t4t3
Coloniil Moblle Hone Park Inc.
3232'So. Cllfton
wichlte, Ibisab 672L6
to:
Real
c0
aK.
811
co
Es tate
8165tr
Messer
8r651
F$-+mzv
1t-- b.--n-Lavrenie & Patrlcla Zatrta
e, {t t'- !' q I :,3::"::,i !il',' iili,ll;t-' ]?; -ii ;x;i;;i;il'-ur'ire"" 4803i;
dtL
10 John & Ju1la Kaen'rer
Box 102
Vall, CO 81651
Bonnl-e & BenJ an1n BIYton
5391 Paris Plke
Lexlugton, KY 40511
1650 S. Colorado Boulevard,
Deover, CO 80222
S treeter
LL42
Mr. Robert Louthao
1845 LoeEncantos Ct.
Los Gatoa' Callf. 95030
Hr. Larrrence S. Mclean
l.Iarlna Towerar Apt. 1023; 501 Slaters Lane
Alexandrla, Vlrginla 223L4
Leon D. Saluenr'Jr.
147 Brrnker 8111 Drive
Rochester, Nf 14625
Sulte 302""--' '-is^t-qooo 'oE'of D"*-
Lea
Borvd
.--.-....-\L-+5-
14 703/ 549-248r
Send statement
Brande s s -Cadmus
Box 1105, Vail ,
to:
Real
co
Es ta te
816s8
C'd* D
Ccduelt\CMnr\ 'KLo t^trL tffi'
w
s12
2 1s, z)ua-ylrLi5"r:tiil,"; = t#I**)i:;S lA'rE4t-'rT f::
fr't t'1-loaE RY-'vr'+t s
iii"i;ttlTirl''eoszr -B '* H8- vxtt- co str|5E
Eerbert ! Francolse Pllessnig '
2237)l
5r-.up -sr17 -.t::.,,, Rt*y
teDent
-Cadmus
, Vall,
(zu"^n
.\ rox 3'(va1I,
se[d sta
Brandess
Box 1105
#7
4
75 south fronlage road
vall, colorado 81657
. (303) 476-7000
Ju'ly '14, 1983
Fred Hibberd
774 Baseline Road
Meeker, Co'lorado 81 64.|
Dear Fred,
Re: Village Center Parking Fee
I!i:_!s-your second reminder that this year's parking fee of
$.5,q90 is due at this time. Fai1ure to-pay this insiallmentshall cause the entire note to become dud.
Si ncerel y,.t
fua &.1*'
,rfm snynE /
Town P] anner
JS:br
var(lN6
July 14,
75 soulh trontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
1983
Fred Hibberd
774 Basel ine Road
Meeker, Colorado 8l 64.|
Dear Fred,
This is your second reminder
$5,800 is due at this time,
shal I cause the entire note
Sincerely,
Re: V'illage Center Parking Fee
that this year's parking fee ofFailure to pay this instal'lmentto become due.
-tfut" d,4*.
afia snvng 'Town Planner
JS:br
Project Application
Project Name:
Project Description:
Contact Person and
Owner, Address and Phone:
Architect, Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block Filing Zone
-
Commentsl
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREET4ENT dared trre l& day of $\lc-pr,rLe^, ,19&f, by and between the TOWN Or varr-,, CoLORADO ]EE--Fwn"J, ana
FRED HTBBERD, JR. ("Hibberd").
WITNESSETH:
. I^IHEREAS, Hibberd is the owner of the property describedin Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporatedherein (the "Property"); and,
IVHEREAS, the Town has requested that certainrestrictj-ons regarding an employee unit be placed on theProperty.
NOhl, THEREFORE, for Ten Dollars and other good andvaluable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged, the parties hereto agrree as follows:
I. The condominium unit l:_nown as Unit #1, VillageCenter East Addition, located on the Property (referred to as the
"employee unit"), shal1 be designated an employee housing unit asrequired by Ordinance No. 33, Series 78, Town of Vai1.
2. The employee unit shall not be leased or rented forany period of less than thirty consecutive days; and, if it shallbe rented, it sha1l be rented only to tenants who are full-timeemployees in the Upper Eagle Valley. The Upper Eagle Valleyshall be deemed to include the Gore Valley, Irlinturn, Red Cliff,Gilrnan, Eagle-Vail and Avon, and their surrounding areas. Afu11-time employee is a person who works an average of thirty(30) hours per week.
3. The employee unit shall not be divided into anyform of timeshares, interval ownershi-p or fractional fee.
4. The restrictions contained herein shall remain ineffect until 20 years from the date of this Agreement, unlessearlier terminated by mutual consent of the Town and Hibberd.
5. Hibberd, or his heirs and assigns, ma-y move the
emp1o1'ee unit to another location on the Property so long as such
new errtployee unit is substantially the same type and squarefootage as the employee unit. Such a re1 ocation sha11 require the approvalof the Town.
6. This .,'igreement shalI be deemed as covenant runningwith the land and shall L-'ind ilil:,l,erd and all subsequent owners ofthe Frcoertv.
EXECUTED the day and year first above written.
ttTowntt
TOWN OF VArL, COLORADO
"Hibberd"
Attest:
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
thi s
VAIL,
said
ss.
The forecloin instrument was acknowledqedday-of , l9g3,
OLORADO, a mun corporat or andcorporation.
Witness mv hand and official seal.
before me
andof the TOWN OFon behalf of
My cornmission expir "", Z7Z-A) J/ ,/?fd
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
)
,
cc
HIBBERD,
.aThe foregoing insLrument was acknowledged before methis fllg day of az--+ttl , 1983, by FRED HTBBERD,
u t(.
Witness my hand
l"ly comm.ission expires :
MY C0ltMlssl0ll E(PIRES
FEBRUARY 11S5
and official seal .
Notary 6{8
EXHIBIT A
(Attached to and rnade a partcertain Aqreement dated tireSt-uu;.Uo^ , legl bv
tEe Town of Vail, Coforado
Hibberd, Jr. )
Parcel Four
recorded onin Book 237
of that
tA daY of
and between
and Fred
A part of Tract C and of Lot K, Block 5-E,
Vail Viltage First Filing, Town of Vail,
County of Eagle, State of Colorado, described
according to the recorded Platthe 23rd day of October, L9'1 4
at oaqe 24.
luwn u
75 soulh fronlage rd.
vall, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
June I . .|982
Mr. Walter Moritz
La Tour Restaurant'l2l East Meadow Drive
Vai1, Colorado 8.|657
/1/ O //2,2,*'--//{7 /
Re: La Tour Restaurant
||tl
W.n-ay; ryf&
department of community development
an outside
La Tour
Dear Walter:
This letter is to confirm your previous approval forpatio to serve Iunch and dinner on the north side of
Restaurant.
S i nc ere'ly ,----\ / ,t'/-&-a -_!.=Tr-^_
DICK RYAN
Corrnuni ty Devel opment Di rector
DR:br
cc: Colleen Kline
lnwn
75 soulh fronlage rd,
yall. colorado 81657
(303) 475-7000
department of community development
l,larch 15, 1982
Joe Bader
Box 244
Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Village Center Building
Dear Mr. Bader:
we have received a nunber of cornplaints such as your concerning the parkingsituation in the basement of the Village center Building. The Town gor".n-nent plans to collect evidence concerning the problen and then take itepsto renedy the situation.
Itlhat r-need from you is a letter outlining your concerns about the parkingsituation. Anned with your letter and others we will decide how to bestsolve the problem.
Yourg,
?4--*JIM SAYRE
Pl anner
JS:br
-ilf-i
.\.
DrsTRrcT couRT,UNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
civil Action No. 81cv15
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
a
co
DYNAMIC TEI,TPORARIES' INC.' CI A1 '
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PETER J.S. COULTER, a/k/a PETE COULTER
STRUCTION COMPANY, ANCI PAUI.,A COULTER'
Defendants.
..-'
.' ':
d/b/a COULTER CON-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
TO STEPHEN L. PATTERSON' Department of CommunitY
Development, Towntrcj 'Colorado, GREETING:
Youareherebyorderedtoattendanclgivetestimonyinthe District court of said county of Eagte, _Eagle county
courthouse, Eagle, Colorado, on the 3] st day ofMarch I Lggz, 3g One orclock _!_.m.t ?s 3rf d rc n , L982, at jE_ O'cIocK r . u. ' cti
witrl-ss Eor-TE ptainiiffs-Tn-th'e action EE-stated above and
also to produce at said time ancl place all records of the
town of irail's Community Developnent Department which in any
oriy pert"in to the remo-clelling lob known as Frisbeez ' Cafe
oe'vlif or Cafe Du Vail , Pizzi n' Pane, located at the
vifiig" C.ri.r inclutling construction permits 00509' 00638'
""a "if inspection t"poit", certificates, cease and desist
orders, and blueprinti, and other written or permenently
freserved docume-nts asiociated therewith for the years 1980
and 1981.
And this you shall in nowise omit, under penalty of the
law.
DATED this 12th daY of March, L982.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
1401 Walnut' Third Floor
P.O. Box 1046
Boulder, Colorado 80306
( 303 ) 444-8538
This Subpoena Ducesof the Colorado Rules of
Tecum is issued Pursuantcivil Procedure.
to Rule 45
VILLAGE CENTER
3/4/82 1:00 p.m.
-- Visit by Peter Jamar, Peter Patten, Jim Sayre-- Discovery of office in 2 main level parking stalls-- Door locked, knocked, we were let into an office-- Saw Tom Atchison (who previously inquired about converting
spaces to office and was infonned of procedures invo'lved todo su ch)
We informed him that this was an i'llegal use of the space andthat it was in violation of zoning and bui'lding codes. tJe again'infonned him of the proper procedures to be fo'llowed in order toconvert the space.-- In 0ffice--3 desks, 2 other people
--Consfderable in and out traffic while we were there--Real estate info on desks (app licati ons , mu 1tip1e 'l i stings , etc . )-- Tom Atchison to'ld us he had a real estate broker's license and wou'ldnot operate a real estate business out of the space in future butdid not say whether he currently was or not-- Phone was answered this morning when Peter Patten called as
Atchison and Company -- not as Village Center Condominium ManagementOffice-- Sign on-- 476-742r
1:45 p.m.
-- Building owner notified (Fred Hibberd) and space red-tagged for
non-comp1 iance with zoning regulations and building code violations.
No one wou'ld answer door upon knockinq - I then returned to theoffice and called Mr. Atchison - a reiording device took my messagefor him to return my ca'l I at the Town.
door ways Village Center Association Management Office
(same phone # as Atchison & Company listed in phone book)
VILLAGE CENTER
3/4/82 1:00 p.m.
-- Visit by Peter Jamar, Peter Patten, Jim Sayre-- Discovery of office in 2 main 1eve1 parking sta1ls-- Door locked, knocked, b,e were 'l et into an offjce-- Saw Tom Atchison (who previously inquired about converting
spaces to office and was informed of procedures jnvolved to
do su ch)
We informed him that this was an'i 'l1ega1 use of the space andthat it was jn vio'latjon of zoning and build'ing codes. We again
informed him of the proper procedures to be followed in order to
convert the space.-- In 0ffice--3 desks, 2 other people
--Considerable in and out traffic while we were there
--Real estate info on desks (applications, mu'ltiple listings, etc.)-- Tom Atchison told us he had a rea'l estate broker's license and would
not operate a real estate business out of the space in future butdid not say whether he current'ly was or not-- Phone was answered this morning when Peter Patten cal'l ed as
Atchison and Company -- not as Village Center Condominium Management
Office-- Sign on door ways Village Center Association Managernent 0ffice-- 476-7421 (same phone # as Atchison & Company listed in phone book)
1 :45 p.m.
-- Building owner notified (Fred Hibberd) and space red-tagged for
non-compl iance with zoning regulations and bui'lding code violations.
No one would answer door upon knocking - I then returned to theoffice and ca'l led Mr. Atchison - a recording device took my messagefor him to return mv ca] 'l at the Town.
zoniwi,A!j
Pl anher ,,/4 ,. ///,/ 4.77,..-_' ; ''' C/*"=
P l anner"-
VILLAGE CENTIR
3/ 4/82 1 :00 p .m.
-- Visit by Peter Jamar, Peter Patten, Jim Sayre-- Discovery of office in 2 majn leve1 parking sta11s-- Door locked, knocked, we were let jnto an office-- Saw Tom Atchison (who previously 'i nqu'i red about converting
spaces to office and was informed of nrocedures involved to
db such)
We informed him that this was an il'l egal use of the space and
that it was in violation of zoning and bu'i 'ld'ing codes. We aga'in
informed him of the proper procedures to be followed in order to
convert the soace--- In Office
--3 desks,2 other people
--Considerable in and out traffic while we were there
--Rea'l estate info on desks (applications, multiple listings, etc.)-- Tom Atchison told us he had a real estate broker's license and wouldnot operate a rea'l estate business out of the space in future butdid not say whether he current'ly \^/as or not-- Phone was answered this morning when Peter Patten called as
Atchison and Company -- not as ViIlage Center Condominium Management
0ffi ce-- Sign on door ways Vi'l lage Center Association Management Offjce-- 476-742I (same phone # as Atchison & Company listed in phone book)
1 :45 p.m.
-- Building owner notified (Fred Hibberd) and space red-tagged for
non-comp1 jance with zoning regulations and building code violations.
No one would answer door upon knockinq - I then returned to theoffice and ca1 'l ed Mr. Atchison - a reiording device took my messagefor him to return mv call at the Town.
t
ntl\u
AOml
/r'(/\/
P lanher
VILLAGE CENTER
3/4/8?1 :00 p .m.
-- Visit by Peter Jamar, Peter Patten, Jim Sayre-- Discovery of office in 2 main 1evel park'ing stalls-- Door 'locked, knocked, we were let into an offjce-- Saw Tom Atchison (who previously inquired about converting
sDaces to office and was informed of orocedures invo'lved to
db su ch)
l,'le informed him that this was an illegal use of the space andthat it was in violation of zoning and build'i ng codes. l.le again
informed him of the proper procedures to be fo'llowed in order to
convert the space.-- In 0ffice
--3 desks, 2 other peop'l e
--Considerable in and out traffic whi'le we were there
--Rea'l estate jnfo on desks (applications, multiple listings, etc.)-- Tom Atchison to'ld us he had a real estate broker's license and wou'ld
not operate a real estate business out of the space in future butdid not say whether he current'ly was or not-- Phone was answered this morning when Peter Patten called as
Atchison and Company -- not as ViI'lage Center Condominium Management
Offi ce-- Sign on door ways Village Center Association Managernent Office-- 476-74?l (same phone # as Atchison & Company listed in phone book)
1:45 p.m.
-- Building owner notified (Fred Hibberd) and space red-tagged for
non-comp'l iance with zoning regulations and building code violations.
No one would answer door upon knock'i ng - I then returned to theoffice and ca'lled Mr. Atchison - a recording device took my messagefor him to return mv ca] 'l at the Town.
PI anher
col(,rado t'l u57
.
APPLICATION lTOII,
(required undcr
IJUSINDSS LICDNSE
Ordirlltnce I-76)
REN EI,JAL
LICENSE YEAR 1982
25. 00 fee for each lace of business must accom l ication :
BUSINESS Atchison a Cornpany
"33?l?3i tbe building)
NAIIE OF
TIAILING
ACUTAL
BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER 47 6-7 42r STATE SALES TAX NUI|BER nla
IOCAL TIANAGER'S NA].IE Thomas G. Atchison.M^AILING ADDRESSeox 1175, vai t
HOIJE PIiONE 476-'7209 RESIDEJ'iCE ADDRESS 5020 I'ra i n cnrp ni -,-r e f 27
NU},IBER OF EI'IPLOYEES
TYPE OF BUSINESS:
(rvinter)
Retail Sales (sPecifY)
Rest auran t lBarLodgingProfessional(specifY) Real Estate sales
Service (speci-fy type) Propertv Management
. ''
, ^, t--. Drrcl naa. rre f eet -Total Area Occupied by Business 360 , squi
IN:DICATE TYPE OF OIfNNP.SHIP:Corporation
ADDRESS
I ndividual PartnershiP
( Summer )( year-rorrnd ) 4
PIiONELIST PARTNERS O
Thomas C. et"ni."n. P- O- *"
James E. Atchison, 429'7 Ridcte Dr., Pittsburq, CA 94565 V'p- / Treq
LrsT olfNER'S ADSRESS rnai 1in & Residence and PHOI'IE NUlf BER:
PLEASE INDICATE: NE$ BUSINESS
LIST ANY ADDITIONAL tsUSII\ESS LOCATIONS
OUTSIDE THE CITY LII1ITS:
EXISTING BUSINESS
FormerlY OPerated by: Atchison&
IN vAIMS LOC.{TED
AITPLICATION DATE Februarv 3, 1982
OP;NING DATE OF BUSINUSS
('l/'
A,i
f,-r / |
"il'U
u
November 1
(s r GNED )
. T iTLE
TRADE
homas G. Atch i son
: l^-+rI e5-L!lgrrL
NAME
LlcursE i _.-____' lssuED
lll:,\t,'t'il zo:; I NG
l,lrrll Applic:Il. lon 1o:
'l'orvrr Ci i: l'lc , Ttlrvtl r t l \':r r l
l). O, llt))i I OO, \frr | | , 1" ' ri I tilrT
Iltil:s.i l(ilil;
,/:' "S:jt
hrrnlltlill)z
box 100 ' vail, colorado
rOR BUSINESS LICENSE
,n.l"t Orclinance 1--76)
LrcENsE ""^, l? g I
lliill[#lilsi
81657
APPLICATION
( required
of , Premises.8 1
wi thin
the building)
BUSTNEss p'HoNE r'runnrn-Hlb -1$1\-----SALES TAX NUI'IBERSTATE
LOCAL TIANAGE 'S NAtrIE
HO},TB PIIONE
NUIIBER OF EMPLOYEES
T'''E OF BUSINESS:
anstosilcr
( Summer )1(-,.-
Retail Sales (sPecifY)
MATLTNG ooPs6556o(\\1b Vlr t-
1
(winter )'L--( year-round )-?_
A
Restaulant /Bat
LodgingFtoi"="ion6r GPecif Y )
service (sPecifY tYPe)
Total Area Occupied by Business 550 square feet'
O\{\IBRSHIP:PartnershiPINDICATE TYPE OF
Individual CorPoration
P}iONE
(or.,
LIST PART}IERS O&-99EP9B4TE oFFICERSIITTLE
1t (-"
A-rc *r
ADDRESS
o. Bor l\'lb "l\'(o {rb- l..{rr
4t{- rblo?rrir
/a,r-- LL*
l.AF4 SroJx-\-
ADDRESS (@ and PHOI{E NUITBER: I
LIST OWNER,S
l;n, lt1\o (toLe C(aL€
PLEASE INDICATE:NEItl BUSINESS
+1 Ar /N
EXISTING BUSINESS
FormerlY OPerated by:
IN vAIT' TNDFBRANCH orrrcrs ,,oc.\'r;D
LIST ANY
OUTSIDE
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS LOCATIONS
THE CITI LIIIITS:
APPLICATION DATE-
OPiJNING DATE OF BUS . NESS
I,l !l-i .4,u ,! J\ \\ ,/"tit -t - t rt ,[r"-) '\' Y. ,,'--- t / --[l.()li ()).1, lci,\'l , t]sl: o
Il!:l \t,t'il-
LICINSE NUIIB1JR
Mai I Appl iclt' I ttn
Tclv;n (l I t'l'li , 'f tltt'tr
P. O. llos l OO , \'il r
to:
ol \':t i
1, r-,,
I
sl,l:r7:.,:)l.l I Nri
Itlil;1.
Y}iAR
!
.PEc
)2/82
-2-
alteration and modification in CC2 District in accordance
or convers on of a two-s
use.
tioned that they had just visited this site and explained the
apply if the request were approved.four conditions the staff fe'lt should
Pete}
a
moved and Piper seconded to table the item
an alternative structure. The vote was 4-2
Fred Hibberd stated that he had no problem with conditions 2 or 3 but questioned
.#4. Patten exp'lained that there had been a number of spaces designated when
the building was constructed, (fewer than would be required now), and if any
of these parking spaces were converted to retail, a parking fee must be paid.
Donovan wondered if there was anything to prevent al'l of the parking spaces from
being converted to retail, and Patten stated that a parking variance would be needed.
Hibberd explained that no parking spaces were designated for the condominiums as
opposed to the retail space, and that he did not want to mark the two spaces as
such. Trout moved and Piper seconded to approve the conversion with the 4 condiiions
as listed, but #3 would read, "The ramp spaces musi be pa'inted and designated as
parking spaces." The vote was 6-0 in favor of approval .
6. Request for a conditiona'l use permit in a Public Use Dist
construction ot z batt,lnq caqes ln l-ord ParK rmmeoraEely souEn or Ene new
Peter Jamar showed the site p'lan and a plan of the batting cages. Discussion
followed concerning the fact that the structure was high (started 4 feet above
the ground), the fact that ther:e was a sewer easement underneath it, the suggestion
was made that the structure could be a temporary one.
Steve Buis explained that there had to be a slope for the balls to roll back down
to a collection point. Pat Dodson of the Recreation Department answered questions
concerning the management of the cages, stating that the town would enter into
an agreement with the owner as to hours, etc. He felt that the concession wou'ld
generate dollars for the recreation department, and that the cages would a'l leviate
the need for batters to have room to practice without using too much space.
lrlhen asked about the sewer ]ine, Dodson stated that they were not locked into thatslte. Corcoran replied that the application was for that specific site. Dodson
stated that the concession had to be put up soon, or the season would be-nearlyover. Trout asked if the structure could be a temporary one with possibly canvas,
sleeves and pipes. Dodson answered that he had done that with certain tennis courts,
and found that the life expectancy of the material was cut about in fal! ag.opposed
to leaving the fences up. 'Buis aitded that one reason for starting the building
4 feet above ground was for security reasons.
was more concern voiced regarding the permanency and the height 9f lhe structure.
stated that if he were to lower it, a concrete slab would be required' and
the design was as attractive and functional as he could nnke it.
There
Buis
that
Trout
wi th
t for exterio
and request the app'licant to resubmit
with Corcoran and Donovan against.
.&.*
)r, 7/12/sz -3-
7. Request for severa] amendments to the Vail Municipal Code redefininq the tenn
at no sinqle familv or two-family dwellinq shall be used in e oli n oartor sno rm rental as acc a r00m use or a
Jim Sayre Ied the discussion and explained the staff's position that the definitionof family should not be revised from the last meeting. Edwards fel t that Section
18.58.310 should be left in the ordinance to put teeth into it, but he felt that
the town shou'l d not dictate the number of people who could Iive in a dwe'l 1ing,
because if they create a nuisance it can be hand'led through the other town ordinances.
He added that he didn't feel the government should tell who could live in a privatedwelling. Trout agreed. Discussion fo1'lowed as to how the town could enfori:ethe use of a single family or two-fami'ly dwelling as a rooming house or a hostel.
Bill llilto felt that the definition of a family as stated was unenforceable, andthat the town shouldn't discriminate against renters vs owners. Patten emphasizedthat everyone uses his GRFA or square footage to the limit, and that intensity of
use was the concern of the staff. He added that unless the zoning co<Fe could betilhtened up with definitions, the town was handcuffed in enforcement of situat'ionslike the one on Forest Road. He added that about 50% of the laws were used ona complaint basis on1y, and that the staff had received many calls comp'la.iningabout numbers of people in units, that it was the staff's duty to protect the integrityof the zoning code.
Sqyre added that it would be a good idea to also get the renta'l agencies to enforce
the code. More discussion fo'l'lowed concerning stiting the number of people allowedin the code. (J'im Morgan joined the meeting.) Donovin emphasized that visitorsto Vai'l did not show Vail the same respect that long term residents did, and she
was concerned about the meaning of short term and long term. Eskwith felt thatthe meaning of "short term" should be spe'lled out. Sayre fe1t that it meant lessthan 30 days.
l{ilto suggested that the commission approve the request with a list of concerns
and send it to the Council. Eskwith repfied that the town was in the middle ofa lawsuit and was being kept in abeyance until the town could decide the issue.The definition of "fam-ily" followed.. A'lso discussed was whether or not to changethe nurnber from 10 to l2-persons maximum per dwe'l1ing unit.
Donovan moved and viele seconded to leave in the definitions'of,,hostel ,,and
f'roofiing house" and change the definition.of "f,arni1y,1 as.stated here below. -
The vote was 6-l with Edwards against. Edwards felt that the Town of Vail wasinterfering in individual family concerns, and that the definition of "family"he was not in agreement with.
The fina'l wording was:
18.04.'l'10 Family
Fami'ly means: a. An individua'l , or two or more persons related by blood,narriage, or adoption, exlud'ing domestic servants living together in a dwellingunit used as a single housekeeping unit, or b. A group of unrelated personsnot to exceed two persons per bedroom p1 us two persons with a maximum ofl2 persons per dwelling unit.
PEC 7/12/8? -4-
8.Request for amendments to the parking chapter of the Vai'l Municipal Codeto c'larifv wordinq. revise certain oarkinq requirements and requlations andto amend the definition of floor area and to include a new parkinq reouirement
ects.cant: Town of Vail.
Peter Patten explained that he had sent to the American PIanning Associationfor information on parking standards and the enclosed changes were the result.
Trout moved and Piper seconded to recommend to Council the changes suggested
by the staff in Sections '18.52.0]0, 020, and 030. The vote was 7-0 in favor.
After more discussion, Piper moved and Trout seconded to approve'18.52.080 B and
18.52.080 C, and to approve 18.52.080 F with the addition of the wording, "or
berm" after the words "A wall or fence" in the 'last sentence.
The vote was 5-l with Donovan voting against and Morgan out of the
Trout moved and Piper seconded to approve the change in .|8.52.090.
was 6-0.
Piper seconded to pass as stated in memo. Vote
Piper seconded to pass as stated in memo. Vote
room.
The vote
Section'18.52.'100 had many different sections to be discussed. Trout moved and
Il-orjjJr seconile-to state that the parking requirement for single-family or two-
family dwellings be: 2t spaces per dwelling unit with one space enclosed.
The vote was 3 in favor (Trout, Morgan and Piper) and 4 against. The motion failed.
Edwards moved and Donovan seconded to approve the section as stated in the memo.
the vote was 3 in favor, 4 against. The motion failed.
l'lorgan moved and Viele seconded to have the parking requirement read "Two spaces
per dwelling unit" without having any enclosed parking required. The vote was 4in favor, 3 against (Edwards, Trout and Piper). The motion passed.
In paragraph A there seemed to be much dispute. Discussjon revo'lved around thedefinition of bedroom, with uses of rooms, and of GRFA. The final motion put by
Piper and seconded by Edwards was: If GRFA is 500 square feet or less, 1.5 spacesper dwelling unjt. If GRFA is 501 to ]999 square feet,2.0 spaces per dwellingunit, and if GRFA is over 2,000 square feet,2.5 spaces per dwel'ling unit.
The vote was 7-0 in favor.
In paraqraph B. Trout moved and
was 7-0 in favor.
In paragraph C, Trout moved andwf,FE-ln-TEvor.
In paragraph D, there was discussion about ratio. The final motion byffiond&f5y Edwards was to leave as in the memo. Vote was 5-2 with
and Vie'le opposed.
Trout
Corcoran
Paragraph E and Paraqraph F were discussed. Trout moved and Edwards secondedto leave tas is-nilThange F to 1.0 space per 250 square feet of floor area.
The vote was 6-l with Viele feeling the vote was being inconsistent.
aEc
7/12/82 -5-
Paragraphs G and H had the words "more restrictive" rather than "greater" in therbffin To paJ-G-Ih-efl by Trout and seconded by Morgan. The vote was 7-0 in favor.
' Paragraph I was next with Trout moving and Piper seconding to accept the change
reconnended by staff. The vote was 7-0 in favor.
Paragraph J was deleted with a motion by Trout, seconded by Edwards. Vote was 7-0.
Paraqraph K after discussion was passed to read 1.0 space per patient ped p1 us
motion by Trout, seconded by Piper. Vote wasspace per 150 square feet with a
6-1 with Edwards against.
Recreaticrn uses were discussed, and it was fe'lt that the Town needed to place parking
fequirements on Recreational facilities whether public or private.
Donovan moved and Trout seconded to have a new Paraqraph J to read: Recreational
uses, public or private: Parking sha'll be requTiEd]-Efrount to be determined by
the P'lanning and Environmental Commission. The vote was 6-l in favor with Viele
aga'inst, with the feeling that the ordinance shouid be more explicit.
18.04.120 F'loor Area changes were
accept the
Viele and
def inition as presented
discussed. Piper moved and Donovan seconded to
by staff. The vote was 4-3 with Corcoran,
Morgan voting against.
9.. Request for amendment to Sections'18.26.045 (A) and'18.24.065 (A) to remove
the
i re-@.
Jim. Sayre. explained that the staff became aware of the fact that since outdoor patios
ought to be encouraged, it would be beneficial to be able to bring patios up forreview-at any time, rather than on'ly jn November and May. The staff was recormendingthe elimination of PEC review since-decks and patios are contained within the Archi--tectural/Landscape Consjderations in the Urban Design Guide Plan and therefore needo.nly be reviewed by the Design Review Board. The eiclo5ure of outdoor patios anddecks would still be reviewed by the planning ConrnlssTon.
Donovan stated that she felt that the Planning and Environmental Conmission strouldstill review outdoor patios. Viele and Piper'-agreed. Donovan pointed out thiT-the Design Review Board would not have the'powei to deny a patib if it felt thatthe patio was not a good 'idea. Corcoran added that if I restaurant were to planto.add a patio, the planning process would have taken p1 ace over a period of't'ime,and therefore perhaps the twite a year process was alright. Morgan'felt that the
DRB was arbitrary in its decisions-and that there needei to Ue m6re adherance tothe.gu'ide'lines. He added that he wou1d like to see specific guidelines drawn upthat the Design Review Board would have to follow similar to lhose of the PEC.It was suggested that patios be reviewed anytime of year, but be left with the PEC.
Patten requested to table the request. Trout moved and Piper seconded to table.
The vote was 7-0 in favor.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:05.
o
Tn.
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PROPOSAL
MEMORANDUM
P'lanning and Environmental Commission
Department of Conrnunity Deve'l opment
,lu'ly B, 1982
Exterior alteration request in
Center Build'ing. APPI icant: F
ict for the Viliage
The Village Center Building contains retail spaci on the street level of East
Meadow Drive. One of the siores is Kidsports.' They wish to expand their operation
to the next lower 'l evel to instal'l a ski repair shop. Currently, the.expansion
space is a 2-car parking and storage area. To rep'l ace these 2 spaces it is..,
pi^oposed to use tire o'ld"ramp which-is now closed in because of the recent addition.
ff'eie-ii veri tittiu aesthetic-type concern involved in evaluating the proposal
because the ixpansion space is elisting, and the customers wjll not be allowed
to enter from the lower level.
COMPLIANCE WITH PURPOSE SECTION IB.26.OIO
The commercia'l core 2 district js intended to provide sites for a mixture of
mJitiple dwellings, lodges and commercial estahlishments in a clustered, unified
deve'l opment. Cofrmerciai core 2 district in accordance with the Vail L'ionshead
urban ilesign gu'ide plan and design considerations is intended to ensure adequate
light, air, open space and other amenities appropriate_to.the permitted types
of-buildin6 ahd usbs and to maintain the desirab'le qualities of the district
by establish'i ng appropriate site development standards.
The proposa'l expansion ful1y complies with all aspects of the Purpose Section.
COMPLIANCE l|lITH VAIL LIONSHEAD URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
l. Sub-area Concepts of Urban Design Guide Plan
No sub-area concepts are involved.
?. Urban Design Consideratjons
a. Pedestrianization: Because customers won't be al'lowed to enter from
the new lower level , pedestrianization t{on't be affected.
b. Vehicle Penetration: 0ccasionally, a service vehicle may have to enter
the parking garage to drop off or pick up sornething, but no significant
changes in vehicle penetration will occur.
c. Streetscape framework, street enclosure, street edge, building height'
views and'sunshade changes: No effect upon these factors is foreseen.
2 Zone
Hi bberd
a
Va illage center -2- 7/B/82
t
3.Zoning Code Considerations
The 2 space trade off on parking is allowed and
the par:king situation at the Village Center. No
exists in thjs zone distrjct, so the addition js
is permitted on basement level in CC2.
does not negativelY affect
ceiling on retail sPace
allowed. The use ProPosed
The Department of Community Deve'l opment.recommends approval of.this proposal'
tne prbposal has no negative effects and does not create a parking probiem'
Conditions of approval are as follows:
il. Before a building permit is issued the office conversjon on the southwest
corner of tfre pait<ing gqrage must be totally converted back to 2 parl<ing
spaces
2. No customer ingress/egress will be allowed through the garage (except
RECOMMENDATION
for emergencies)
.3. The ramp spaces
. 4. -The applicant must----- for"'the square feet
J
:
..-...,-'
must be painted and designated as parking spaces
pay the appropriate fee into the Town's parking fund
of retail expansion.
Q'&\r'*-s
o
PLANN iNG AND ENVi[IOI'II'1[NTAL COI"IMISSION
July 12, 19Bz
I : '15 pm S'ite v jsits
2:00 pm
L Approval of minutes of June 28, 1982 meeting.
2. Request for exterior alteration and modjfjcation for One Vail Place to
allow exterior seating on the east side of the building for le Petit Cafe.
Appl i cant: E'l I iot Al po|t3. Request for conversion of 19 apartrnents to condominiums at the Inn at tr/cst
Va'i 1. Applicant: James Barry Craddock, d/b/a Craddock Development Cornpany.
4. Request for approval for conversion to tine-sharing for Ipanema Condonjniums.
Appl icant: Dayrner Corporation
5. Request for exterior alteration and modification in CC2 Disrrict itt accordancewith Section .l8.26.045 for conversjon of a two-space parking area in theVillage Center Condominiums to retajl use. Appl icant: Fred Hibberd
6. Request for a conditional use pennit in a Public Use District in accordanceto allow the construction of 2 batting cages 'in Ford Park inmrediateiy southof the new restrooms. Appl icants: Steve Buis and Town of Vail .
7, Request for several amendments to the Vail Municipai Code redefin'ing the
term "Family,", adding definitions of "hostel" and "roonring house" and providing
that no single fam'ily or two-famj'ly dwei'l ing shall be used in whole or inpart for short term rental as acconmodation un'its, a rooming house or a hostel .Appiicant: Town of Vail
g. Request for amendments to the parking chapter of the Vail Municipa'l Code
to clarify wording, revise certajn parkjng requirements and regulations andto amend the definitjon of Floor Area and to include a new parking require-
ment for employee housing projects. Applicatjon is in accordance with
Sectjon .l8.66..l00-.l8.66.'l60 of the Vail Municipal Code.Applicant: Town of Vail
9. Request for an amendment to Sections .|8.26.045 (A) and .l8.24.065 (A) to remove
the words "outdoor patio." This takes the adding or rernoVing of outdoorpatjos out of the Urban Design Guide Pian process w"ith regard to PEC approval
requirements. Appl'icant: Town of Vail
. PROPOSAL
The Village Center Buildjng contains retai1 space on the street level of East
Meadow Drive. One of the siores is Kjdsports. They wish to expand their operation
to the next lower level to instal'l a ski repa'i r shop. Currently' the expansion
space is a 2-car parking and storage area. To replace these 2 spaces it is...
proposed to use the o'l d-ramp which-is now closed in because of the recent addition.
ttrei"e is very little aesthetic-type concern involved in evaluatjng the proposal
because the Lxpansion space is eiisting, and the customers will not be allowed
to enter from the lower level .
COMPLIANCE t,JITH PURPOSE SECTION IB.26.OIO
ME]4ORANDUM
T0: Planning and Environmental Commission
FR0M: Department of Conrnunity Development
DATE: July I, 1982
SUBJECT: Exterior alteration request in the CC2 Zone District for the Village
Center Buildi ng. Appl icant: Fred Hibberd
The commercia'l core 2 district is intended to provide sites for a mixture of
multip'l e dwe'l 1ings, I.odges and commercial establishments in a clustered' unified
develbpment. Cofrmercial core 2 district in accordance with the Vail Lionshead
urban ilesign guide plan and des'i gn considerations is intended to ensure adequate
'l ight, air, oFen space and other amenities appropriate_to the permitted types
of-buildjng ahd usbs and to maintain the desirable qualjties of the district
by establishing appropriate site development standards'
The proposal expansion fully comp'l ies with al'l aspects of the Purpose Section.
COMPLIANCE l^lITH VAIL LIONSHEAD URBAN DESIGN. GUIDE PLAN AND. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
1. Sub-area Concepts of Urban Design Guide Plan
No sub-area concepts are jnvolved.
2. Urban Design Considerations
a. Pedestrianization: Because customers l,lon't be alloled to enter from
the new lotter level , pedestrianjzation won't be affected.
b. Vehic'l e Penetration: 0ccasionally, a service vehicle may have t0 enter
the parking garage to drop off or pick up something, but no significant
changes in vehicle penetration will occur.
c. Streetscape framework, street enclosure, street edge, building height'
viet{s and sunshade changes: No effect upon these factors is foreseen.
viue center _2_ 7/B/82
3. Zoning Code Considerations
The 2 space trade off on parking is allowed and does not negatively affect
the parking situation at the Village Center. No ceiling on retail space
exists jn this zone district, so the addition is allowed. The use proposed
is permitted on basement level in CC2.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department. of Community Development recommends approval of this proposal .
The proposal has no negative effects and does not create a parking probiem.
Conditions of approva'l are as fol lows :
l. Before a building permit is jssued the offi.ce conversion on the southwest
corner of the park'ing garage must be totally converted back to 2 parring
spaces.
2. No customer ingress/egress wi'll be a'llowed through the garage (except
for emergencies)
3. The ramp spaces must be painted and designated as parking spaces for the
Vi1 lage Center Condominiums
. 4. The app'l icant, must pay the appropriate fee into the Town's parking fundfor the square feet of retail expansion.
cmEEma0$
July 6 ' L982
Vail Planning a Environmental CommissionVaiI, CO 81658
Gentlemen:
This letter is in reference to iten nurnber 5 listed on the agendafor the July 12, 1982 meeting.
I feel that Fred Hibbardrs request for a change in use fronparking to retail should be denied. Crossroads Shopping Centeralready has rnore problems with Viltage Center residents and
customers using our parking than we need or can handLe.
If the variance is granted, expect a similar request from
Crossroads Shopping Center to change its parking to retail.
Sincerely r
ilervyn L. Lapin
MLL/La
n{ o'Prc
PLICATION FORM FOR
MODTFTCATIONS IN COI'4MIRCIAL CORE Ir (CCrI)
\TAIL LIONSHEAD
I. This procedure required for alteration of an existing building which
adds or removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio or replace-
ment of an existing building shall be subject to review by the Plan-ning and Environmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted until all information is submitted.
I. NAME OF APPLICAI{T Frecl Hibberd
ADDRESS ZZa easeline Rd. U HONE (303) 878-4234
2. NAME OF APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
ADDRESS
N/A
PHONE
EXTERIOR
o
AP
AI,TERATIONS OR
3.AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
SIGNATURE
Applicant is Owner
If^ ,.-U ,Il)
<1"11-l
ADDRESS PHONE
4. LOCATION OF PROPOSAI
ADDRESS2 L22 East l'4eadow Dr. Vail, CO.-----E pa7f ofTra -LEGAL DESCRIPTIgpFiTst Filing, Town of Vai1, County of Eagled(rlFFFFoof
5. FEE $f00.00 plus 189 for each property owner to be notified.
N/A
6. Improvement survey of property showing property lines and l-ocationof build.ing and any improvements on the land.
N/A
7. A list of the name of owners of all Property adjacent to the
subject property and their addresses.
II . Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following ilformation:
A. The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36r'at ascale of l" = 20'; a variation of the sheet. or scale may be ap-proved by the Comrmrnity Development DePartrnent if justified;
B. The d.ate, north arrow, scale and name of the proposed development
shall be shown on the site plan;
l(,.'*Jn^-' fP(ts**'-
L/2s /[r-
, L+'ur4dcl,--,- ts;ffi-|,"L.
ft- 34 r /] '-w *-'.l
The existing topographic character of the site including existingand proposed contours. This condition will only be required foran expansion area where there is a change of two feet of grade;
The location and size of all existing and proposed buildings,structures and improvements;
The existing and proposed J-and.scaping patio ad,ditions or deletions.
III. The applicant shaIl submit in written and graphic form, a preponder-ance of evidence before the Planning and Environmental Corunissionthat the proposal is in conformance with the purposes of the CCIIDistrict and that the proposal substantially complies with the VailLionshead Urban Design Guid.e Plan.
A. If the applicant is proposing a major change to the Vail- LionsheadUrban Design Guide P1an, the procedures for change are noted j3
Section L8.24.22O (B).
IV. The aPPlicant must also submit written and graphic supporting mater-ials that the proposal substantially complies with the followingUrban Design Considerations section of the Vail Lionshead DesignConsiderations.
A. Height and MassingB. RoofsC. Facad.es - Walls,/StructureD. facades - TransparencyE. Decks and PatiosF. Accent ElementsG. Landscape Elements
Itlany of the above'items should be addressed in some graphic meansusing such tools as sketches, simulations, models (including neigh-boring buildings), photos, etc.
The Town of Vail Zor,ing Code for CCII also describes other zoningissues that the applicant must respond to in written or graphicform.
VI . Applications for exterior alterations or modifications in CCII canbe received up to .tu1y 31, 1980. After that date, the time frarnesnoted in Section 18.24.055-4-5 apply.
c.
D.
E.
v.
I THIBBERD O
IIICONSTRUCTIONI ICOMPANY OF VAIL
May 12, L982
TOr The Town of Vail planning and Envirorunental Staff
RE: Village Center Shops
Applicant desires to change one enclosed parkinq garage fromparking and storage to a ski repair shop. The Location is tobe on the second story parking garage 49 t nast of theentrance to the parking structure on the north side of theisle. See p1an. To satisfy parking requirements applicantproposes to relocate two spaces to two previously un-committedparking spaces or purchase parking rights from the Torvn of Vail.The Third space required would be purchasecl from Mr. Mike Doylewho originally owned two spaces in the parkings.ructure.Mr. Doylerformer owner of unit 5c village center condominiums hgssold Unit 5C and now desires to se11 parkins space #47 on theupper level of the garage to the Applicant.
Access _to this space would be either from Kidsports shop spacelocated directly above the repair shop or from the garage leveror both.
Thankyou for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Fred Hibberd, Jr.Box 1170Meeker, CO. 81641
POST OFFICE BOX 1170. MEEKER, COLORADO 81641 . TELEPHONE (303) 878.4234
nnsoluTloll No. I?.Series of l-974
A RESOi,UTfON ITPPROVIIIG AN AGRElll'lENT l{IiDREBY
THE DEVI]LOPER IdILL COi.ISTRUCT A LAIqDSCAI'ED
PLAZIT lln VILLi'GE CDliTjiR PROVTDED A VARiANCE
ELITili'IA'I.I}JG TIi'trI'iTY_TTIO PARKI}]G SPACTS 1S
GRANTED BY TtlE TO',,N' IilD TilD TOIIN TSSUES A
BUILDIIiG PEIT}'IT FOP. h PORTIOI.I OF SAID PROJECT
I'IIIEREAS, the provisiorls of ihe Zoning Ordinance,
Ordinance No. 8, Serics of 1973, of the Tor.rn of Vail, Colorado,
v;ou1d perrnit Fred Hibber, Jr., developer of '"he Village Center in
the Tcl.,'n of Vait. Colorado, hereinafter referred to as the "Tovtn",to construct t\.,'eniy-ir..'o parking spaces in said project in addition
to ninety-ti.ro parking spaces which vrill- aciualJ-y be constructed
therein;
I{HEREAST the Tor..'n Council, having the favorable reco:n-
mendatron of the Planning Ccrtnission of the Tot'tn, considers that
nirrety--uwo parl<ing spaces are adequate for the Village Center anC
that it ..rould be reasonable, eppropriate, and beneficial to the
Tor..'n and its citizens for the council -
Pa
saiC projeci a variance elimina
cEl5frE-GEEEes in order to harre said developer construcL a lanisaiC projeci a v per construcL a land-
I./HEREAS, the developer must obtain building permits frcn
lhe Tosn, corr.ineilce canstructi.on, anC have an encIoseC. buildin3in said project by the lst da1' of JuIy, L974, in order to obta:n
a gas ccnnection for saiC project with the PubLic Service compail)'
of Col-or.:do; and
ItHEREAS, the @ ag'reement vrith thelfu:-
uenEer to a.ssure ffine ar-ore-veloo.er of the [ir laqe
e.ndscaoed plaza
as surect o1. recelv ng e af o::esaid varianbe an u]- J.O_---_-.-...-.permrcs;
NOI'I/
OF TliE TOiTii OF
THEREFORE, BE ITVAIL, COLORADO,
RESOLiTED
AS FOLLOHS
BY THE TOVJIi COUI*CIL
Section 1. Tit1e.
This resolution shall be known as the " resolutio:1
Agreemen!ction of T.anCscaped Plaza in VilIa
Section 2. Approval of Agreement and authorization for
executicn TIZreoE.
The Agreenent deteC the 16th day of April , L974, by and
b€+ul.]a€r the To'.vn of Vail, Colo::a<io, and Fred llibber, Jr., an un-
€X€cu'u€C ccpl' ot r.'.'hich is narked "E::hibit 1", attaeheci hereto, and
made a part lrereof , is here'oy a.poroved by the Tor'rn Council and ther'-"^' { - L^-'L.' authc:ized bl' thc councii to e>:ecute sai cl aEree-IJd,) \-,i -l:J lll.jl- UiJ)meni, o:: a moclif ieC ve;:sion the:'eof rvhich contains substantially
f hr, s,a'ri- r:''rrrri .: ic'r.q i n irr.l.> l i of thg Tot+n.i?-vi^,-.rv9|r5.4v
Section 3. l:ttachnen'.- of e:tccuted copy of Agrecment hereto.
Af ter an agrcen.:nt ]ras becn d.ul1' e>:ecuted by the oarties
in compliance r+ith Scction 2 hercof, an c;iecuted copy of said
agrccrrcni, sh.r11 fo::'cl'rrrith be riarked "Er:hibit 2", attached here."o,
and maic c part irereof
bec.Ita 4
:!: gE;lit
$$t
l$T
{.if'\{6alt0r
\
urt
-\
c
tl]
l-o
O
i\
o
./l.ll
E;D-\vt
\ rrr\\ ,')\<\\tr\\<\\o
!!,
Yd.
't
toa \O\
1%\o
',v
l'\i \:
at
\?a\\u
{?r1{
I${
l
Eir
-i5
{lr!,1
EI
,{
il
tl
il
.rltl
liltil'ol
'#
rlrII
$i
liI
{
$r
q6lt'
l/l
ur
7.J
c
t.
Yo
!l
'D
t(
o
t,
Yd-
o
i
o
.Jl
!!\)
4.(o'\$l
E\o\-'rb\o
,,</
:1::i.V
ilft1{LJ
{:!rI,r{0l5{
i{
l5
rili
tql
lsl{{lilII
l?l
J^lu;l
il!l
'l rlol
'(L
urf
'r
o.', (E
.,
?
oa
4-a
,er
D
{i
3t,
6t
3loirl
6l2l;larlfl
JItrl>lqtJl
dltJrl
a.{
E-l
:JI
tr
OD
?.
*T
t\t{l
Vlfq
:_
n
do
tgl
ttt
a'l
tl!
e
F\(\-
a o
7fc
-a
Lo-e
f
s
a-I
,f
D
.[i
*l
6tJI
3l
?l
6l2lrlcrlfi
Jltrl>lulirl
f;l
o.lql
5l
J
t-l
tvl
/iat
\
=
Lr*
oo
f{_
J
ty-
o-(-
A
sa
q
a0
I
r$
7
il
0t
u
)
tx
dJ
fr
3
-9
rf
J
tL
o-(.
D
s2
5a
ilI
I,t
1
$
d
)lll
aJ
frj
_9
o
ro-
tLL
c-
D
sa
q
a
CI
I
t$
7
Tlll
d
)
lrl
dJ
H
7
.T
o
r{
J
IL
o-
6-
D
sa
5a
ilt
I
t$
7
$
d
)
IT
aJ
f;
]
-9
I(
\
/? lL'11
la
/
t.o
'','I\1'
lnuln u 1lffl
Mr. Fred Hi-bberd
774 Baseline Road
lteeker, Colorado 81641
nt of communitY develoPment
r 16, 1981
the 6-wing condit j-ons were Part
on the 850 square foot aPartnent'
:-all imProvenents in the Plaza
box 'l 00
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
i''' \
rU
I
I
Dear Fred:
Regarding the Village Center proposal'
of the aPProval:
1. That a 2O year restriction be placed
2. That the applicant is responsill9-fo"
i"-irt" easi-of the proposed addition'
3. That the applicant deilicate the necessary land for the bus land and
ualkwaY.
4. rhat the appl icant aercil :".!i"i:iP;:",,i:'"?:';:: ;:l"l:li"ii,ii"rll"
a speciaf irnprovernent district' ft €
s. That the applicant aqlee t: "'::I :::h the Tor'n.i"--t-h:^:"d"veloprnent of
the walkway along vi.llage center o"iiai"g D and pay for those inprovenents
iii". ait""ily beiefit his conmercial space'
In aildition, at the Torvn Counci'l neeting' you agreed-:? ll*i"ipate in the
olanning cost if ti'"'-p"tt-"an be '"gt"iit!a oui of the public plaza cost'
ilso, Ron Toild stated ih"t "tt Private i;;;;t;;;"ts rnust be completed two
vears fron aPProvar '
,rn."r"rr,
//'.]* i L.1-^-.-
DICK RYIS{-omtnunitY DeveloPment Director
DR:br
Re: Village Center
hwn n
75 south frontage rd.
vail. colorado 81657
(303) 475-7000
l|tl
department of community development
Decenber 22, L98l
Fred Hibberd
774 Baseline Road
Meeker, Colorado 81641
Re: Village Center Addition
Dear Fredl
This letter is to confirn that the only items renaining to be conrpletedPrior to receivilg a final certificate of occupancy are to have thelandscaping inspected by our staff this spring and to pay the parkingfee of $11,982.00.
The parking fee is due at this tine. rf you have any questions, preasecontact me.
Town Planner
PJ:br
PETE
?,^")^$,-J
I
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(3031 476-5613
department of community development
Decenber 8, 1981
Fred Hibberd
774 Baseline Road
Meeker, Colorado 81641
Re: Parking Fee
Dear Fred:
Our Town Attorney has asked rne to have you sign this promissory note
concerning the parking fee. The first installment date has been
left blank. You can fill the date in the day your restaurant receives
its certificate of.occupancy. I would also like to have a check
for $11,982, payable to the Town of Vail , in this office the day
the certificate is issued.
I would also like to congTatulate you on the conpletion of the Villlage
Center addition. It is a quality contribution to the Town of Vail .
Yours,
A' ,/'/k-.-- V^*
/tJIM SAYRE
Planner
JS:br
Encl .
I $ss r82 vait, color"o" n"t""--r--rr*t
In installnents after date, for value received, I prorni.se to Pay to the
order of the Town of Vail at the Office of the Finance Dj.rcctor, Municipal
Building at Vail, Colorado
Thirty-five Ttrol sanil One Hunrtfed Fighty Twn-----=.=-Dollars,
with interest at the rate of -0- per cent Per annum, payable in yearly
installnents as fol l ows :
The first installnent of $ 11,982 due and payable on
with subsequent installments
Aptil 24, 1982 ,April 24, 1983
of $ 5,800 due and payable on
, and April 24, 1984 , with the entire
unpaid balance due payable on April 1gqs
Fred Hibberd
Dat e
IT Is AGREED that if this note is not paid when due or declared due hereunder,
the principal and accrued interest thereon sha1l draw interest at the
rate of 18 percent per annum, and that failure to make any paynent of
principal oi intet"it when due or any default under any incunbrance or
agreement securing this note shal1 cause the whole note tb become due
"i on"", or the interest to be counted as principal , at^the option of
the holier of the note. The nakers and endors.is hereof severally waive
pre sentrnent for payment, Protestr notice on nonpaynent-and of protest'
and aglee to any u*a".rlon of tilne of paynent and partial paynents before'
at or after natuTity, and if this note or interest thereon is not paid
when due, or suit ii-brought, agree to pay all rcasonable costs of collection,
including reasonable attorneyts fees.
LEGAL DESRTPT1ON
A parE of Village CenEer, Tot.n of Vail, Colorado, the nrap of wtrictt is
recorded in the office of the Eagle Cor-leby, Colorado, Cled<. and Recorder in
Bnok 226 at Page 624, saLd part being described as follcnnm:
Begimrirg at a point of tangency on the southerly
riglrt-of-way of East l'leadcht Drive, v#rence Etre south-
east corner of said Village Center bears S 39o05'34" E
237.79 feet disttrrt; thence easterly 32.84 feet along tbe
arc of a curve to the riglrt hawing a radius of 35.50
feet, a central argle of 53'00'00" and a dprd wttictt
bears S 75"02'35" E 31.68 feet; thence 80.80 feet alorg
the arc of a curre to ttre left having a radius of 77.00feet, a cenLral angle of 60o07'37", and a drord l*tich
bears S 78o36'24" E 77.I5 feet to the right-of-way of
East Meador,.r Drive; thence the follo^ring three courses
alorg said rigfrt-of-way' (1) northerly 4.23 feet
alcng the arc of a curve to ttre right hawing a radiusof 145.77 feet, a central agle of 01"39'43", and a
drord v*ridr bears N 37"10'44" W 4.23 feet; (2) 79.17
feet alorg ttrc arc of a cr.rrve to ttre left hauhg a
radius of 69.58 feet, a central rgle of 65"11-'42" and
a drord wtrich bears N 68"56'44" W 74.97 feet; (3) S
78"27'25" W 34.41 feet to the point of begimdng, containing
1,940 square feet or 0.044 acres, more or less.
E. Stemark
Colorado L. S. 16844
ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION
I,RODNEY E. SLIT'ER ,l'layor of the Town of
Vail, A Co'l orado Municipal Corporation' and on beha'l f of the Town
of Vail pursuant to the authority vested in me by the resolution
duly adopted by the Town Council of the Town of Vai'l on the 1st
day of December ' 19 81 ' do hereby accept the above and
foregoing dedication for the uses and upon the following terms and
condi ti ons :
IN I,IITNESS l,lHEREOF 'th'is 'instrument has been executed this
Lo-e day or , E-tL'
(sEAL)
ATTEST:
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
TOVJN OF VAIL
l) ss
)
The. foregoi ng AccePtance of Dedication was acknowl edged before
me th ;s lat daY of b o'-^l"t- ' n [ / ' aY
PolleYe.\Lt{e&asMayoroftheTownofVail.
I,tITNESS mY
My commiss
hand and official
C/ o.
PUBLIC
i on expi res :
s ea'l
DEDICATION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THATFREDHIBBERD,JR.istheownerofacertainparcelofland
more partieularly described in Exhibit rrAtr attached hereto and
incorporated hereln and does hereby dedicate to the Town of vail '
a colorado Municipal Corporation, for public street purposes, said
parcelofland,asbuiltandexisting,andFREDHIBBERD'JR'does
herebyconvey,release,sellandquitclaimallofhisright,title,
interest in said property free and clear together will all appurtenants
and privileges, free and clear of any estate, claim, title or i-nterest.
whatsoever of FBED HIBBERD, JR. , his successors and assigns ' to be
used by the Town of Vail for public street purposes only'
IN WITNESS WHEREoF, said FRED HIBBERD, JR. has caused his name
to be hereunto subscribed and attested this 1st day',of December, 1981 '
Attest r
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
THE FORECOING INSTRUMENT 1VAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME rHrs loF-
)SS.
DAY oF v0 t' , B-L/, BY FE€b t+(Bg€Ktr AND
lYitness my hand and official seal .
FRED HIBBERD,
)/a
rires, r{'tLLr-tJ1
RESOLUTION #35(Series of 1981)
A RBSOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION FROM
FRED HIBBERD, JR., A PART OF VILLAGE CENTER'
Toffi 6r vail', cor'oRADo; AND SETTTNG FoRTH
OBiEII,S IN RELATION THERETO.
\IHEREAS, rred Hibberd., Jr. has dedicated a certain parcel of land
to be used as a Public roadwaY; and
IfHEREAS, a certified legal description of the parcef of land
has been prepared and submitted with the dedication' which is
incorporated herein by reference; and
IYI{EREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail wishes to accept'
tbe dedication for the public health, safety and welfare;
Nol{,THEREFoRE,BEIToRDAINEDBYTHEToI'NcoUNcILorTHETowN
oF vArL, coLoRADO:
It 1s hereby known that the dedication of such property as
evidenced on the attached Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
reference, being duly executed by Fred Hibberd' Jr" b€ accepted'
INTBODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _JET dAY Of
\2-ea--/"tA-' , 1981'
ATTEST:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A part of Village Cetter, Tovn of Vail, Colorado, the nep of *rich is
recorded in the office of the Eagle Coutty, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder in
Frcok 226 at Page 624, said part behg described as follorps:
Begilning aE a point of tangency on the southerly
rigfrt-of-way of Easc Meadcnr Drive, r,*rence the south-
easE corner of said Village Center bears S 39"05'34" E
237.79 feet distant; thence easterly 32.84 feet along the
arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 35.50
feet, a central angle of 53o00'00" and a chord !fiich
bears S 75"02'35" E 31 .68 feet; thence 80.80 feet along
the arc of a curve to the left hawing a radius of 77.00feet, a cmtral agle of 6A"07'37", and a drord lttdch
bears S 78"36'24" E 77.1,5 feet to the rigfrt-of-way of
East Meadow Drive; thence the follcruing tlree courses
alorg said rig[t-of-way' (1) northerly 4.23 feet
alcng the arc of a curve to ttre right having a radiusof 145.77 feet, a central angle of 01"39'43", and a
chord v*rich bears N 37o10'44" W 4.23 feeh Q) 79.17
feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a
radius of 69.58 feet, a csttral angle of 65o11'42" and
a chord v*ridr bears N 68o56'44" W 74.97 feet; (3) S
78"27'25" W 34.41 feet to the point of beginnilg, containilg
1,940 sqr:are feet or 0.044 acres, rnrre or less.
Colorado L. S. 16844
ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION
I,RODNEY E. SLIFER , [,layor of the Town of
Vai't , A Colorado Municipal Corporation' and on beha'l f of the Town
of Vail pursuant to the authority vested in me by the resolution
du'ly adopted by the Town Council of the Town of Vail on the 1st
day of December ' 19 81 ' do hereby accept the above and
foregoing dedication for the uses and upon the following terms and
condi tions:
IN IIITNESS l,lHERE0F, this instrument has been executed this
)) ss
)
methis lrzt- daYot fuau^lttZ 'nt/'aY
PoltlgV e ' \Lt{e< as llavor of the Town of vail
IIITNESS my hand and off icial sea'l '
My commission expires ' dtL'-L''i 3/ '/9f"
' j\ I lltLc.t- day of lJe-el-"lLttt'- ' t9 tr / '
( SEAL )
ATTEST:
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EAGLE
The foregoing AccePtance of Dedication was acknowl edged before
TO}IN OF VAIL
DEDICATION
KNOS ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT FRED HIBBERD, JR. is the owner of a certain parcel of land
more particularly described in Exhibit rrAtr attached hereto and
incorporated herein and does hereby dedicate to the Town of Vail,
a Colorado Municipal Corporation, for public street purposes, said
parcel of 1and, as built and existing, and FBED HIBBERD, JR. does
hereby convey, release, se11 and quit claim a1l of his right, title,
interest in said property free and clear together will all appurtenants
and privileges, free and clear of any estate, c1aim, title or i.nterest
whatsoever of FRED HIBBERD, JR., his successors and assigns, to be
used by the Town of Vail for public street purposes only.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said FRED HIBBERD, JR. has caused his name
to be hereunto subscribed and attested this 1st day of December, 1981 .
Attest:
STATE OF COLORADO
COIJNTY OF EAGLE
ss.
THE FoREcorNG TNSTBUMENT tryAS AcKIIowLEDGED BEToRE ME THrs lpF
)
)
DAy oF |Wfu4r,h^, Ls-Ll B\ l=K.€6 t+tBBE7<l AND
FRED HIBBERD,
) ,/i r-./l d.-, /z7rr,' (/a,rl.',
NOTARY PUBLIC
lVitness my hand and official seal .
Itfy commission expir"s, f/tZLolJ/
o
RESOLUTION #35(Series of 1981)
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION FROM
FRED ITIBBEND, JR., A PART OF VILLAGE CENTER,
TO\TN OF VAIL, COLOBADO; AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO.
WHEREAS, Fred Eibberd, Jr. has dedicated a certain parcel of land
to be used as a Public roadwaY; and
I{HEREAS,acertifiedlegaldescriptionoftheparcelofland
has been prepared and submitted with the dedi'cation, which is
incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Town council of the Town of vail wishes to accept
the dedi.cation for the public health, safety and welfare;
NOW, THEREFORS, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COI]NCIL OF THE TOWN
OF VAIL, COLOBADO:
It is hereby known that the dedication of such property as
evidenced on the attached Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
reference, being duly executed by Fred Hibberd, Jr" be accepted'
INTRODUCED, BEAD, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _-JET dAY Of
l\-e'eo-",t't'ltt-', 1981'
ATTEST:
IEGAL DESCRIPIION
A part of Village Certer, Tom of Vail, Colorado, the nrap of *rich is
recorded irr the office of rhe Eagle Cor-rrty, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder in
Brrok 226 at Page 624, said part beirg described as follcrs:
Begfuning at a poinE of targercy on the southerly
riglrt-of-wery of East Meadovs Drive, vihence ttre souttr-
east corner of said Village Csrter bears S 39"05'34" E
237.79 feet distanti thence easterly 32.84 feet along ttre
arc of a curye to the riglt taving a radius of 35.50feet, a cerrtral angle of 53o00'00" and a drord v*ridr
bears S 75o02'35" E 31.68 feet; thence 80.80 feet along
the arc of a curve to the lefc having a radius of 77.00feet, a central arigle of 60o07'37", and a chord vfiich
bears S 78'36'24" E 77.15 feet to the r:ight-of-way of
East Meador.; Drive; thence the follo^rirg three courses
alcrng sai-d riglrt-of-way: (1) northerly 4.23 feet
along the arc of a curve to the righc traving a radir:sof 145.77 feeE, a csrtral angle of 01"39'43", and a
chord r*iidr bears N 37"10'44" W 4,23 feet; (2) 79.17feet along -*re arc of a cr:nre to the lefc tawilg a
radius of 69.58 feet, a csrtral agle of 65o11'42" anda drord vfiich bears N 68'56'44" W 74.97 feet; (3) S
78o27'25" l,; 34.41 feet to the point of beginning, contain-irg
1,940 sqr:are feet or 0.044 acres, npre or Iess.
Colorado L. S. 16844
Conditions fron Town Council Meeting 10-21-80
Who designs the; plaza?
Dick: One of the conditions that !ilr. Hibberd has agreed to is that the designof the plaza would be in conjwrction with the consultants for the Toun, Gage
Davis, & Associates, and I think he can speak to that, Hers here tonight,but the Planning Connission specifically asked that question, and he said, "yesrthe would work with the Torm as far as thatrs concerned.
Rich: Will he participate in the financial planning costs? You can ask him that
Dick: You can ask hin that question, I assune that that would be part of it, yes.
Mr. Hibberd?
Hibberd: Yes, if that can be segregated out for the plaza itself or whateveris spent on that with respect to design
Ron T. O.K. Is there a tine linit on the conpletion on that? .Is there anything
addressed as to when the Plaza has to be conpleted to satisfy this agreement?
A11 these iterns that are listed as rururing along with the approval . Should wenot address the fact that those things have to be acconplished within a reasonable
amount of time. If construction is going to begin next, that there be a tirnelimit of 18 months or two years, whatever, for the completion of all of these
agreed itens.
Dick: That has not been placed in here, but I think thatts an excellent point that
should be added, yes.
Ton S. Where does he obtain parking for this 2900 square feet?
Dick: He would be responsible for paying the assessrnent that Town Council has set upfor Corunercial Core I and Cornmercial II as far as...
Ton At the current give away price
Dick That is correct, sir.
Are there any othea questions? Do we need to take action on this tonite, oris this just infornational?
Eskwith: No, you need to by notion approve the action. The reason that this came up,
because there was a previous agreenent.
Dick: there uray be soneone frorn the public who will want to speak on this
Do we need to specifically amend this resolution No. 12 back in 1974, or..
Eskrrith: I think the notion can just say that the proposal is approved and that the Council
recognizes that it an anendnent of that resolution.
Dudley: Gentlenen, I suffer fron a long nenory, and I have urany concerns, and this
happens to be one the projects, r guess the last project that Fred did, and hsr5
n"r,rt"" AND ENVTR.NI4ENTAL "o*l"oN MEETTNG
MondaY, October 13' 1980 3:00 P'M'
COI]NCII, ME}4BER
BilI. wilto
STAFF PRESENT
Dick RyanJim RubinPeter Patten
Betsy Rosolack
MINUTES OF
MEI"IBERS PRESBNT
cerry White
John Perkins
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Gaynor lrtiller
Jjr Morgan
t
Themeeting\.tascal].edtoorilerbyGerry.yJhite..Dancorcoranrnoveiltheminutes of the sept g meeting be lpproved' -seconfed bV Ed Drager'
5-0 in favor (,ffnr't"lorgan and Gaynoi pliller hadn't arrived yet) '
Peter Patten presented the staffrs feelings as written in the memo mailed
to the Commissiotrl i"""t*ending denial . Whitney Miskell distributed more
i"r"r "Lifrr-i""r"aing. a retter-from the neighbor to the east approving
the greenhouse. -t"t Corcoran felt it would be a positive addition to
a very plain East side of the house. John Perkins said he was the original
A";;6";;-itta "fifr""git ft" would abstain fron the.vote, agreed with Dan'
;;;;'r:'*o.,"a that ihe variance b"^eE9{+*1-??: seconded it' rhe vote
was 3 in favor, ile.tty) against. GAynor-€b-stained, since he did not hear
the discussion.
2.Miskell eenhouse addition Block 2 Vail Villa 13th,
setbac variance request-
3.Addition to Villaqe Center Buildin D rinq both a Densit Control
Variance an an Exterior I'lodifica onA ro-nef -.-Be.'iS e q--Blgre.gel -
Jim Rubin said a survey had been- completed to see if the proposal.
would interfere with tie bus lane, aid explained-the differences in this
;;;;";i:--lle-poitted out the 5 conditioni listed in the rn-emo that the
staff wanted to see implemented if apProval was g-ranted'. Iie felt- that
ii!-ifl" -;;; i; basic conformance wilir the Vail village Urban Desisn Guide
plan and VaiI lionshead urban Design considerations' The 2 smaller units
that were reqest;e uv iir" staff in the original proposar were discussed-
cecil Dodson, presid-ent of Village center condominiumn Association, Bldgs
A,B & c questiorr"a--pproval of tiice the sguare foota.ge as Proposed in
the Urban Design Cuial Plan. Dick Ryan reptiea -that the Urban Design Guide
plan d.j-d not dictate e>ract plans, bul was a guide only. Mr. Dodson prot'este
the two storj.es, but stated that he approved the improvement of the area'
John Perkins felt that the massing helped to make the transition from one
story to the present two story fuifaing. l4r-..Dodson asked if it was worked
within the urban Design Guide PIan. Cerry l^lhite replied that-the UDGP
;;;i;;;.; ihe guide. 6i"t added that Jeff winston had reviewed this proPosal
ir.r."t"a the first tirne, but not the 2nd one. John P. questioncd the
landscaping of the area to the "."i, and if the ovrners would work r'rith Jeff
of\that.FredHibberdrepliedhervould,ad.<lingthatthelstplanlradthe
same footpt:int, then he tried to please others by changing the elevations'
In doing so, one owner had to exchange li'is view for additional space.
-Pec-2-10/15/80
o
Fred Hibberdrs statements on the 5 conditions were:
I. he wasirrt looking for a condo to market
2.he|dliketocontinuetoto.workfurtherwithJeffWinston3. the bus lane does encroach otio rtir property, but it and the walkway
work well ana he will dedicate the necessary land for them
4. agrees with this
5. agrees with this
Ed Drager didnrt agree with having a second story, since a I story was
shown in the uDcp. John perkins 6tated that the desigm cannot be- set
at the :sca1e of 1,'=200 r, nor square footage specified- Gaynor Miller felt
that in working with rrid tor l-t/2 nonthi, thlt.this was a much better
e;;ig; and thai ii would blend. i' very wel1, adding that the Town needs
.buses and walks ind a compromise shouid be made' noger- T: "9d?9 that the
location r"" ,r"tf--.ri.iUi"- and that when the commission had visited the
site that they nid agieea that a one story bui-lding didn't look.r1ght
at that location. C6rry agreed and statea ttr"t he felt it was in keeping
with the UDGP.
Roger moved for approval subject,to the 5 conditions in the memo' John
seconded- vote was 4 in favor, 2 against.(Dan a Ed against). Jim abstaine
since he didnrt hear the full discussion''
4. A Conditonal use Request for the coveied.Brilge-store,!9-al1ow the
Jim Rubin summed up the memo, stating. that the staff was in favor of
;ffr;;|; i"i-tit"*i"iii"J-llit"a-in lhe memorandum. Ed Draser asked trow
one could say that there is no r/tay one can keep people living.il .the
core area--dicl that mean no one winted to live there? He felt it was
inconsistent with the prior case where the staff is insisting that an aPart
go in to make "o*uirrirrg look better because people will want to live there.
ii* n"li" felt that th6 apartrnents were in two different locations'
This one is right across trom 2 night clubs with more commotion at this
location.
John Dobson stated that Bridge street is a heavily traveled area in vaiL
Uses of this type have been granted. In the early days, it made sense,
but doesrr,t now to any where near the degree. Gorsuch, the Bank building'
etc. have done the saire thing. There are perhaps two long term spaces
:.n-tne core, ""a--pr"""dent his been established. Long term has not
worked out. oan borcoran . then added that the Town is being
sued by a ProPerty ottt"t who considered just the oppositef that his proper-
iy-*.r-guile .tafu"Ufe, namely the tower over the Rucksack. They certainll'
wouldn,t r^rant that conversion. He stated that he was on the Planning
Conrnission r+hen the conversion came through with the apartments that
usedtobeabovetheLiquorstoreandheoPposedthat.John Dobson asked ifconditionaluses werc granted to the ore House Buj-Iding,
ln. cvi""o buildingr or for Gorsuch. He repeated that the precedent
had been establish6A ana that long term housing simply does not work
outinthatareaasitoncedid.HereadthepurposeoftheCClzonedistrict.
Jim Rubin reiterated one.statement that John D had made, that there
are no contrors that would reguire those units to be 1on9 term. Joirn
could rent them out short term.
A Conditonal Use Request for the Covered Bridge Store lo-allow the
' - ' ' ' '= ;iesrqeniiJ; ;-- -t"tutt=t--,-o.- 'conversion of one aPrtment lorm r. -
.PEC - 3 ]o/1sl80 o
Gerry.White stated that the history of downtown-Vail had been one of
both granting and a."yi"g use for -iust this kind of thing. There is
+16 ...,y1.'por .f no.i="itlai zoning lhat was dealt with a long time ago
iii=uitFtSit-t" keep rhe miiture-in the downtown area. He stated that
the was much more conversion to conmercial sPace on every level, with
ialk of the Gashof Gramshammer being converted to commercial space
throughout. He felt that this h/as a sort of death knell for the core
area.. He felt very strongty that commercial space should be on ground
level and the second level should be residential'
BiIl Wilto mentioned that one prior conditional use was granted because
it was felt that no one wanted to live there, but the fact was, the
renters enjoyed the apartment, so it was suitable for some. "Not
desirable housing" he felt was incorrect.
There was some talk of asking John to restrict John Dobsonrs other
apartment to employee housing if this conditional use were granted,
Uirt it was felt thlt conditional use had nothing to do with employee
tto.r"irrg, and John felt also that that rule should have been applied
to oth6rs as well, if the commission was going to expect it of him.
Gaynor l'li}}er moved to approve the request, John Perkins seconded
it: Gaynor voted for it, but the other members voted againstr so the
vote was 2 -5 against.
5.Re
a
st for a front setback vqrlq4ce-ler-ge Gart to construct
6EiFo?E on l,ot 12, glock 7' vail village lst'
Peter Patten presented the material from the staff, and recommended
denial . steve Boyd, the contractor for the project, exPlaining that
tfra ortt.t wanted a covered parking area where he now had gravel parking,
that was encroaching 6'or 7'onto the setback. John Perkins felt that
to deny this didn't make sense, and discussion folfowed about whether
it was better esthetically to permit a garage to hide the cars completely-
John moved to grant the variance as long as a garage -was constructed,
seconded by noger. The vote was tied with Dan abstaining. JohnrRoger'
and Jim Morgan for.' Gaynor' Gerry and Ed against'
Roger moved to deny the carport, seconded by Gaynor'
Foi denial were Jim, Gaynor, Gerry and Ed. John and Roger against
denial . Request denied.
6. nejght Amendment for SPec
eas6aaA-Loaqe.
"rr;;;;ed the matetlar from the staff , and reconmended approvar.
He explainLd that the design seemed appropriate. and that the increase
would onty be one foot. Andy Norris showed drawings'
Roger moved for approval subject to the Planning and Environmental
Commission's granling of the Amendment to the lleight Section of SD4 '
Ed seconded, ind the vote was 6-0, unanilnous, Dan abstaining.
. .1 PnC - 10-15-80 .o
7. Anendqents to zoning Ordin
i Audience part,icipation was requested first. George Boyer, Betty Thomas,\.- Mason Thomas, John Drywalker, Paula Lallier, Andy Norris, Ster^/art Brown,Charlie Pol^ters' Fitzhugh Scott, Joe l'lontana, Stuart Holland, Dean
Canada, and Kathy Warren spoke in opposition to the amendments. Theirconcern dealt with the fact that they thought their property was beingdevalued' some felt the decision was arbitrary, some felt a 40E slopeshould be built uPon. Sandy Mills took exception and stated that allshe could hear was "you are taking from me" instead of looking'at the. desirability of these changes for the whole valley and being positive.
Afterward, the commission members stated their feelings:
Ed Drager: Many of these ideas have been discussed for a long time.
VJe must have done many th.ings right.
Dan: As the docurnent is now, Itm against not counting the 408. Infavor of new definitions of GRI'A' for proposed changes in density control.
Jim: Iieight well- taken care of, hillside development questionable.
GRFA not greatly changed, against not counting 408, for section IV.
John: Doesntt feel d.ensity control section needs to be changed fromwhat it is now. Hsight limitation have been 6cared of; footprint fine,at'one time had 308 as cut-off point, GRFA - careful-- somelimessecondary unit !.rould be cut down to be very small unit.
Roger: Our concern is to get a document to control visual impact,we need more work done. However, I get concerned about all commenLson values. If one had bought proPerty even 5-8 months ago, one wouldhave experienced an increase in val-ue. I agree that it is importantthat values continue-
Gerryr we are prirnarily dealing with space. I feel 40t slope shouldnot be omitted. I like GRFA. Concern about values.
Roger moved to table the meeting to October 27, ,John seconded itUnanimous, 6-Q (caynor had left).
Roger vras selected to attend the DRB meeting on Oct. 15.Ed moved and Roger seconded to continue the rest of the agenda untilthe next meeting.
l'11,jMOIt1\Nl)Ult
'.t'u :PLANNf NG AND INVIRONI!'T.INTAL COMMf SSIOI\]
FROM: DDPARTMI'iNT Otr COMI'IUNITY DLVIJLOpMTNT/JII{ RUaIN
D,\TE: IO/9/80
p Ti, .Revised Villarge Center Proposal_
'p-E€gligrgN--ar -88 oun s'{
The revised Village Ccirter Proposal, i.s very similar to the fj-rst proposal.The first ffoor is icientical, showing 2,gOO square feet of corunercialspace, The second fl.oor is what has changec. The new proposal shovrsan.850 scjuaJ:e feet apartmeni- that rviil lre usecl as a l_ong tlrm rentarl-unit. 'fhe sercond floo:: also has 200 sguare feet which is to be addedto Les Strccrterrs apartment in Village Center Buil.ding D. This.additionis'to replace the wi.ndow that the ne* ad.dition vrill remove. The plazato the East- of the new add.ition remains in a similar confj-guratioir towhat t^/as present,ed in the Fi.rst proposal
oo
A survey has been done: o-f t.he arealocatj.on of the buildirig cloes leavea walkway.
DEPARTMENT RECO}IMENDATION
which dete.rmined that bhe prcposed
enough room for: the bus l.a-ne ancl
impro-rements in the plaza
1and. for the bus lane and
The Depart$lent of Comnrunity Developrnent ::ecororrends approval of the revj-se,fplan with the following conclitions
1- That a 20 year: resLriction be placed on t])e 850 squerre foot apartment.
That the appJ-icant -is r:esponsible for allto the East of the proposed addition.
That the appli.cant dedicate the necessar:ywalkway
z"
5.
That the applicani agree to participate'in and not remonstrate againsta speci-al improvement district, i.f lnd when formed for vail vilIige.
That the appJ.icant agrree to work with the Town in the reclevelopmentof the walkway alcng village center Building D and pay for tholeimprovements that directly benefit his conrm6rcial space.
We feel that tbe revised plan is in basic conformance with the Vail VillageUrban Desj-gn Guide Plan and Vail Lionshead Urban Design Consid.erations.
Mnl"loRAl'iDtll'I
PLANI''I IN G AND EI'IV]-RONIvIENTAL COMlvl I S S IOn*
.1i.,+
DcrrsitY
Var ia:'lce'
Center
!'ROM: DEPAIITI'jENT OF COi'1MUNITY DEVIILOP]"IENT
n:irn: 8/r9/80
TO:
DF.Addition of a 4,000 square foot-building east of Vi'llage Center
Building o. :-ocailo li-"-ptrt of Tiaci; c' Btocl< 5E' vail Viliage
First Filing t"q"illig ["'trt "-nertsity contro]- varjance and an
Exterior l'lodif ical:ion 'qPprovar 'Applicant: Fred Hibberd
TheVi}.l-ageCentcrrislocelted:LnaCommer:cialCoreIIDi-str:ic{:,so, althcrigir iL i"'io"-i*d adjacerr!.--t" viil vilIage. it r^i:i 1'1 be revier.\'ed
undert'heVailviliagea'n<lVailIiionslreadDlrsj-gn(jr,rnsideraL-ions.lL
is, however, :-".i,a*d-it' iit" v"ii"i]ii*gt utt'-;t Desj'gn Guide Plan'
i"A *iff be reviewecl bY that Plan'
Tl'reproposalisfora4,000squarefoot-buildinqlocatedtobheEast of Viilage centtr Building p=i""-top^91 the covered p'rrking) '
The 4,000 squar"-;;;L-is to "o''=isi-of 2-'900 square feet of ground
level coirrnercial space and a u."oia i..t.i 1,100 square foot managerrs
apart-ment.
PROPOSA].,
This proposal must be revier^r:*-?"dlT::t" :::"::::tH"::,::::;.o".lli"u.l::il::'#;-;";:';;'-rn"arr i"fri9" t - tl?-::'i*:n.,:i?:::t
STATISTICS
Total Land Area = 65,299 sq ft
i:";::;"["iil"ii'"'i]'b'6 ";;-;i il"il ;;' ? "" 1t :' I i:::
^ 11",,::i 1::"r-s rleeLreq J-\.,! ,'^".,:j.,::--,i-r1^ih lr -' Iuare lool-,i-igeis currently in "*"*"u of both its Linit and its sc stanCal,f s.
fn looking at ttre past hisLory of the Vil-l-age Cetlter Bualding'
there was a zz p"'iiig-"p"""-ve':ilil n:=":l lI-:1"..T:Y^::"*::t"::|}::i,,H:"""3ioEi'i;:"r::i:! I?'tiin: "d;";4. =i"". variance was sranred
irr exchange for u' i"nanttpe ptazal'*n:-"rt it !h:' plop:led :1::^:f !h"
new buil<ling. we, therefore,.navl a"t"=*it"cr that lhis :tequest' if
approve-d by the rianning conunissio"' *iff .also have to go to the Torqn
council for a Resolution amerrding-tiesolution No. 12, Series of 1974'
Total lto. of Units Allowed:
Total No. of tlnits Exist'j-ng:
)t
62
ft
units
units
GRFA AIIowed:
GRFA Dxisting:
52,239 sq
65,038 s;g
"!3"1
Commerc ial iruil-ding I.l : 5 ' 16 0
o
A.' EXTERIqR MODIFICATION
2 - 8-19-80
RBVINW
coMPLr/t{cE WITH PuRPosi SusfroN 18.26 - o1o
sites for a
is inLencied to ensure aoequal'e '13"ii iliiiAii,q unb ,r"u", and to.mai^tain
lppt"pti"te-to the.permi::"|-:v::orrir:r. bv est-abt;";;;;'appropriate site
The proposed addj-tion does conply wil:h the pu)rpose section by creating
another builcling -"t i"t, would u" .r.,tii"t"a .oltr-t' the existj-ng deveropment
an. wourd actuarty create a more iiiii"a development. The present land-
scaped a::ea to d'" ;;;;""r*s;Iid;;';-i: ;19-11!-teen an evesore and v*I
never function ptJp"trv i" E:-trt"t '1seable or aesthetic open sPace'
CO}4PLIANCE WITH VAIL LrO}ISI{EAD URBA}I - DnslGN GUrDlt P-U$n AND DE-9IGIL-COJSI-
I
-iBni./r
'Ihe commercial core II ?i?tfi't, i:^::t":*:u.::,*:::Hi'":i:;itif,i"i.=il:.::y':i'iii.!ili; il"iii;gil -r"'1s'='-i:u.::::::::i'":::'?'i5l':?l::.
li":":i":;"'JH:'[;iri"a-a"";;l:t*:l; :?:':T;;':::]ancl ol-her amenitiesi: i"?ffi;;-;;'";;;;; adequate- il?h:; l:1i^?::""i3'il:
aPproPrraEe-Lo ''iiiii""tJt"I'r"'bi"tri"t by est-ablishing appropraatci s1
the desirable que .!^.r /-^a-a nict-ri.:t 1I is i'tended to::;"i:;i:ii'!'lI3#;;:" ;19-g;'y:*l:1"":i"":i:iii:l Il.'i.''l::::8"*3"tv-i::il3:-:t;":'i::-iu"ia";tiar a*eiiinss at densities not
five dwelling units Per acre'
DERATIOIqS
1. Sub-Area Concepts of Urban Des-ign Guide Plan
Number2IoftheEastMeadowDriveSub-AreaConceptsdescribesaonestory acldition ot-iin,i-r.r size to the one propo".h itt this request' The
nroposed addition does irave " ""Jorra-=ioty--{rvirere
the manager's unj-t is}
tut-this seconrl story would i,.fp-io-Ui;;k"the larser building behind it
which is also ,p;;;;i";ity menti""Ia"i"-iiumber.211 k'e feel that the
general intent ";-N""tr';; ir i" r'";"s follov;ed L')' this request'
2. Urben Design Considerations
a. Pedestrianization: The proposed addition will enhance the
pedestria" ;;;;i;"""- uv ma*ing- the scare of the buildinss a mor:e
comfortableoneforthePerson-walkingbetweent}reTransportaticlnCenter ..ra cro!=t""at' i'nottier fart 6f this.proposal is to work
witir tlre Town in Lhe constructioir of a peclestrian warkway alon<;
the south side of Village noaa. - rhis will greatly enhance the area'
b. vbhicle
incorPorated
Village Center BIdg D -
c. StreetscaPethe Pedestrian
d. Street Enclosur:e: This
street enclosure situation
buil..ding in the b;tckgiround'
Penetration:Aserviceanddrop-offareashouldbeinto the new design.
Framework: this proposal will vastly improve
experience.
building adCition will' jmp::ove t'he
by reducing Lhe impact of the larger
e. Street Edge: The Street Edqe
r*hich. in this casle' will enhairce
witl become slightly more regtrlar
the peciestrian exPerience '
t. Building Height: The two level proposal is welL under the
allowed building hej-ght.
g. Viervs:No v-iews are itrlpact"eid by th-i-s proposal
tr. Sun shacle charlges: I{ot si ginif icant '
B.
.!&r.
village center Bldg. D - 3, B/79/BO
3. Zoning Code Consideralions
The 4,000 square foot addition generates an additional parking reguire-
ment of approximately 1I spaces, which cannot be accurately determineduntil more specific floor plans are subrnj.Lted. The commercial part ofthe parking.requirement vrourd be assessecl at $3r000 per space, Lhe resi-dential at $5,000 per space.
RECOMI4ENDATIONS
The Depa::tment of Conrnunity Development
recommends approval of the commercial par-L of the proposal as +-he
proposal specifical)-y o::ients itseff to the objectives of the Urban DesignGuide Plan of Vail Village and the Design Considerations for VaiI Lions-
head r.vith ihe following conditions:
I. The applicant agrees to participate in and not remonstrate againsta special improvemerrt district if and when formed for \rail Vi1lage.In adclition, agrees to tledicate the land necessary for i-he exclusive
bus/pedestr.ian lane if dete::mined by the To'rm as the appropr:iate
desiglr solution for t.his area.
VARIANCE REQUEST REVIEW
CRITERIA AND ]IINDINGS
Upon Review of criteria and findings, Section 18.62.060 of the
cipal Code, tJre Depart-ment of Community Development recommends
of tire requesteC Variance based upon l-}-ie following factors:
Consi<1e::ation of Factors:
MrlYr ': -denial
1. The relationship of Lhe ::equested variance to bther existing or Po-tential uses and structures in the vicinity:
The current \ziflage Center comPlex is 25 units and l-2,800 sq ft over
what is presently alloryed. The only type of Density Control Variances
that we feel is acceptable is for bona fide. employee housing. We
question if an 1,100 sq ft managerrs aparttnent is bona fide employee
housj-ng.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretat.ion
and enforcement of a specified regnrlat.ion is necessary to achieve com-patibility and uniformity of treatment among sites irr the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of sPecial Privilege.
We feel that a I,100 sqwith the intent of thespecial privilege.
3. llhe effecl of Lhe reguested variance on )-ight and ai:r:" clistr,i-bution
o.f population, transportation and l-raffic facilit-ies, public facilities
and utilities, and public safety.
None of t.hese items are affect-ed by this requesL.
ft manager's apar:tment would rrot be consistent
ordinance and could be considered a granl of
,l o o
Village Center Btdg - page 4 - 8-19-80
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission
to the ProPosed variance'
There are no' other pertinent factors'
FINDINGS:
The Planning and Bnvironmental Commission
ii"a:-"gs beiore granting a var:iance:
. That the granting of the variance will not' co:rst'itute
orivilege i,,"o"=i"tent with tfre fimitations on otlter
:i;;;ril;d in the same district'
That the granting of the vdriance will not be detrim€ntal to the
health, safety, or welfare' or "-tliilri]-itt1u":-ous to properties
or improvements in the vicinitY
Thatthevarianceisvrarranteclforoneormoreofthefollowing.
reasons:
Thestrictorliteralinterpretationandenforcementofthespeci-fied regur"tior,-Jl"ia ""t tl=oil-i" piactical-difficulty or unneces-
sary physicar rraiaship inco""itiuil ioiin trtu objecLives of this
titIe.
deems aPPIicable
sha]1 make the following
a grant of sPecial
proPerties .
There are exceptions or ext::aordinary
applicabfe to ifre site of the variance
tb-other properties in the same zone'
t'he strict or literal interpretation and
;;;"i;i;" *""ri-a"ptit'" the appricant of
the owner" o, .h"t iroperties in the same
circumstances or- conditions-ltat do not aPPfY generallY
enforcement of Lhe sPecified
privileges enjoYed bY
district-
public
the reguestedthat the
are used
D EPARTI'IEN T,EE9IYTENq4II9U
DePartment of Coffnunity Development recommends denial of
1, 10 o ss ft manaeer' " .?9-?::T"::;^"?:i- :*:n::tn::"1ff"?"1'l-00 sq rt'u""1";;"difi;#;;" l;; '*ifu"r units that
1,100 square feet-"lf"iv-i"r long term employee units'
I
PLA}JNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
AGENDA
September 8, 1980
Work Session
Z:Ob p.u. Meet a.t Village Center Building D to lookat revised proposal for Village Center.
Public Hearing
3: 00 P.M.
1. Vj-llage Center Building D, Tract C, Block 5E, Vail Villagelst Fil-ing, Den$ity Control Variance and an ExteriorModification to construct a 2,900 sguare foot commercialspace and a IrI00 square foot mairagerts apartment addition.
2. Cyranors, appJ-ication for an Exterior Alteration and Modificationto allow an addition onto the existing Gondola Ski ShopBuiIding.
3. Vail Vii-Iage Inn, Unit 128, Conditional Use Permit to allowthis unit to be used as a real estate office.
4. Garden of the Gods Club, rezoning from Public Accomrnod.ation(PA) to High Density Multi-Family (HDMr)..
''95
o
MM]Stn"ofr*" AND ENVTR.NMENTAL co
Minutes of Septernber B, 1980 Meeting
I{EMBERS PRESENT
Gaynor Miller
John Perkins
Gerry White
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Jim Morgan
SION
STAFF PRESENT_-.-.--..-+
Jim Rubin
Betsy Rosolack
COT]NCIL MEMBER PRESENT
Ron Todd
The meeting was called to order by Gerry White.
1. Approval of .
Roger Tilkemeier corrected the minutes saying that he had abstained
in the vote on the Lionshead Gondola building, making the vote on that
6-0, with one abstention
Roger also felt that he had. voted in favor of item # 6, a setback
varidnce for Lot 34, Block 1, Vail l"leadows Subdivision' Filing l.
That vote would then be 6-1 in favor of denial .
.tohn Perkins seconded,the motion for a.djournment for that meeting.
Ed Drager mored these minuLes be approved subject to the above changes,
Roger iitfemeier seconded, the vote was 7-0 in favor of approval
2. Approval of minutes of September ), 1980 meeting.
Dan Corcoran moved these minutes be approved, Ed Dra.ger seconded,
and the vote for approval was 6-0. Gerry White absta.ined.
3.Villaqe Center Buildin D, Tract C, I3lock 5E, Vail vj-l-!a e Ist Filin
@and an Exterior Modification to
a 21900 sguare foot commercial space and a 1.100 square
construct
f oot manag'er I s
apartment addition.
Jim Rubin presented Lhe staff memorandum stating that this item had been
.. postponed until the second floor was redesigned. He felt that perhaps
it -snouiO be postponed another 30 days to Permit a look at the btrs and
walkways.
Discussion followed suggesting tivo concepts: The inclusion of a second
story with a small-er foot print, or a one story with a larger foot print'
Some felt Lhat it may be better not to discuss this now, since they vtould
have to go back in 3-0 days to see what Jeff Winston of Gage Davis Associates
had planncd.
Gerry White felt that in all fairness to the applicant, he was entitled
to find out the corunission mernberst reaction to the plan'
' PEC l"linutes - ,-t-O page 2 r,v
"Fred Hibberd said. held like to hear the comments on either: of the twoproposals. and commented that the 2 story was actua].l-y L-l/2 stories.He added that, for the record, they might want to wait to see where thebus route would come in.
Jim Rubin stated that the Urban Design Guide PIan used one story as a guiCe.Discussion of height followed, and Fred felt that there was an in.""uracyin the urban Design Guide pran outline of Building D. He repeated. theidea that they wait until the bus route was known.
,fohn Perkins added that there would be high vehicular traffic on thiscorner, and that_might influence their decision :,'
Comments from the members:
Jim Morgan: I feel that the original presentaLion was a better transitio:in roof line.
Ed Drager: rf the guide lines suggest one story, r feel we should staywith_the guide lines. rf the applicant wants something larger, r feel heshould say why it should be larger
Dan Corcorant I prefer the first presentation without Lhe top floor and.with a larger ,open.area.
John Perkins: I favor the first present.ation, but I'm not sure if I farro:it without the 2nd. floor or not. I can approve of it verticalLy, but witroutknowledge of.bus routes' etc, we dontt have all the pieces to alke a decision
Gaynor: r agree with Jim and John, the orignal plan is the rnostaesthetic and can be worked out. r canrt commit to a decision, but thestepping down'of the roof seems less stark.
Roger Tilkemeier: r prefer the first to the second. plan. rt is not asabrupt. We should wait to see where the bus routes come.
Gerry: I feel that the original Urban Design Plan with a story added toit is my choice. until we know what is needld for busses and wi,rkwu.ys,
]we canrt make a deci.sion.
Fred Hibberd reguested that the item be tabled until the october 13meeting.
,John Perkins moved that the item be tabled until_ Octoberof the applicant. Roger Tilkemeier seconded. The votein favor of tabling.
4.. Cyrano's, application for an Exterj-or Alteration and Modification toarrow an aclditio4_gnlo_lhe el<isting Gondola ski. shop buirding.
Jj-m Rubj-n presented the staff memorandum and the staff recommendationwith the three conditions as stated in the memo. Jerry Greven of Cyranotsshowed plans and elevations. Jim Rubin-stated that it was nonconformingin that it covers more of the site than presently allowed. He addecl thatthe site coverage reqlr4ement c-an be- sujerceaea lr the chanq'e isa positive one. He added that the stafi feels tnJt-ltie'p;ii; iri tne fac16is a positive contribution since it is on the south, and that the area
13 at the --'equestwas unanimolls, 7-0
lpnc iaunites - 9-B-el p.g" r
for which it is ProPosed is not now
Parking spaces were discussed, and Jerry was reminded that more spaces
may be. required (the payment for them) -
The Northlvest corner of the building was felt to be an eyesore and that
Mr. Colombo must address this part of tfre design. Mernbers were unhappy
with the visibility of the trash dump and the parking space.
Gaynor Miller moved that the commission approved the addition of L2O
"qi,.r. feet with-the staff recommendations included. Roger seconded
this, and the vote was 7-0 in favor ofthe application'
5. VaiI Village Inn, Unit I28, Conditio++l use Permit to allow this unit
3.
Jim Rubin presented the staff meno and explained that the staff recommendel
denial because of the 50 parking space deficiency existing now and because
to approve could add to the congestj-on in an already congested area'
Discussion included the fact that the 3rd phase would bring the parking
spaces into conformance, but that it was unclear when or if the 3rd phase
woutd be buitt. The appticant, Van Ewing stated that this office would
not generate any additional auto traffic, and that parking was provided
for lhis unit n6w. He ad.ded that his employees would park in the parking
structure. Mention was made of Mike Pa1mer's office and that it was not
to generate auto.traffic, buL that I or 2 qars daily were ticketed there.
Motion to deny for the reasons oqtlined by the staff was made by Dan
Corcoran, seconded by Jim Morgan. Vote was unanimous, 7-0'
6. Garden of the Gqds C1ub, zone change
MF).
Jim Rubin presented this and mentioned that ihere had been changes sincethe memohad..been written. Onb sleepingunit-wouldberemoved & nade ihto
a managerts apartment. A11 changes would be interior with the possible
exception of a couple of windows.
Gordon pierce, arChitect for the project, stated that there would be fewer
people, fewer cars. no restaurant. aiO ttrat each unit would contain extrenely
small kitchens. The owner was reguesting the change because financially
the private lodge would not work out.
Roger T. mentioned that a lodge was favorabte in the commercial coref
.tri co*p.red the situation in l-,ionshead where there are few lodges in the
core, and that condo owners tend to stay in more. The building is in a ke1'
location. The feeling of some of the members was that it could be changed
to a public lodge.
Gordon Pierce stated that this was not in tionshead, but in an area where
there is already a good mix of different uses. This was a small private
club made into a few apartments. He felt that the comrnission rl'asr't con-
sistent, that this was down zoning, and felt.tl-rat it was a good move on the
Townrs part.
very aesthetic.
,
pEc, r.rinutes - ,-td - page 4
Gdrry fe1t, that the need for accommodation units was important in a resort.that the number of accommodation units was what made a resort work.Ed Drager felt that if they were changed to condo units, the accommodationunits would be lost forever. nan pointed out that there was a differencej'n down-zoning and change of use. More discussion of the effect of remcvi:qaccomrhodation units not being good for the town. John perkinJ-cia-not"-'-''agree with the others. He felt that this was a special request thatdid not quite fit as p.A. units as they are presently used.- He feltthat if it were changed to condominiurns, the number 6t people would belessened who would have an impact. He also felt that tire town has nooption to gain public accommodati_ons
9g"ty white aisigreea, and mentioned that he had had 4 peopre co::le toltis lodge from the Garden of the Gods reguesting lodging alcommocations.others suggested that it be changed from-the prLvate club to public rodgin;to keep the use consistent with Lfre zone a:.strici.
Gordon wanted to know how the Town could object to down zoning, and theanswer seemed to be that it was the use that, was objected to, -not thedown zoning, and that these units wourd. not serve the public.
Roger Tilkemeier rnoved to recommend, to the .Town Council that the zoningchange of the Garden of the God.s from Public Acconurodation to High DensityMulti:family be de4ied because lodging units are vital to the weil beingof a resort community. Dan corcoran seconded this. The vote was 6-twith John Perkins voting against d.enial .
Gerry told the applicant 16a1 this would be brought to the counc:_1on september.16. Ed Drager moved that the staff send a memo to thecouncil explaining the commission's position, Roger second.ed this, andthe vote was 6.-1, John perkins againit the idea.
Gordon requested a copy of these minutes.
More discussion of the item followed. Gerry felt that to grant thechange wourd set a dangerous precedent. a"i hotel_ coul_d be convertedto a private club, and then converted. into Sondominiums.
Ron Todd felt that Gordon did have a point with regard, to inconsistencj-esin Town actions. He felt that if there had been real concern that thiscould happen, the time to show it wourd have been at the t,ime that theapplicant asked to be a private club.
'fohn moved to adjourn and Dan seconded. unanimous vote.adjourned at 4:43 p.m.The meetir.g
.f
t..
. MTNUTES * lT:1"
MEMBERS PRESENT
Gerry lfhiteEd Drager
Dan CorcoranGaynor Miller
John Perkins
Jim t"lorgan
Roger Tilkemeier
AND ENvrRoNr.rENTAr O^rrrro*25, 1980 3:00 P.M.
l. Apprbval of minutes .of August l-1, 1980.
Dan Corcoran moved to approve the minutes, seconded by Ed Drager,vote was unanimous.
2. Exterior l'lodification to the Lionshead Gol-dola Building.
Jim Rubin presented the project as explained in the memorandum andstat,ed thaL the staff recommended approval. B. J. Brit.ton, ouner ofA Place on Earth. showed drawings and dejscribed the snow pilecl hishin the rvinter in front of the building. He mentioned that the two stcrefronts were conceptual , tirat there were no tenants as yet. Discussionfollowed concerning the fact tha.t the barrier in front of the bu-i-Idingseparated the building from the mall-, and that it was so wide that itlacked people perspecti-ve. f t r^ras f e].t that this modj-f ication was neededfor the l,ionsheeld commercial exposure. Darr Cor:coran moved to approve.,subject to the conditions noted in i:'he staff report, Ed. Drager secondecl ,the voLe was unanimous.
3. _Sg!.bgg!_','ariance to build a deck on Lct 1. Bli<. 8, V.Villa4Jt]n
Jim Rubi.n presented the projecL and, after explanation, stat"ed thatthe staff reconunended denial because no hardship exist.e<l . Eileen Sctrj-tlin.;explained the drawings further, and pointed out, that a ueighiior (Davis)was girzen a variance to extend a cleclc and builct a garage. Further,neither of her nei-ghbo::s objec'bed, an.rl the oLher owner of herduplex v"'rote a .letter requestir:g Lhat Eileen br: all-ov,'ed. t.o buiId onthe. WesL in order not to j-ntrude on his privacy. She iroirrtecl out thatthe reason the deck was not proposed for the back rvas to save the treesthere, aud because the sj.te was s'teep. Discussj-on f oll-owed about thefact that there is no nej.ghbo:: to the I{est becarrse it j.s a.n avalanchcarea, anil will never be occupied, therefore won,t i.mpact arlyone.
Roger Til.kemej.er noved t.o approveand all voLed for app::oval exceptDrager v;ho voted against approval
4- g! -I-1:-4ddi1iegpeter Patt.en presented t-he rcc;uest explaining that it rn'as rrol in CCI.
Pau.l. Joltnston nte.ntioneC that there was ir past pat:kj-ng ;rqr:ccment betwccmtJre Christ-i.ania Condos. the VA. and ChaLeau C}:r:j-stj-anj.a. Roger Tilke:oe.i.er
COT]NCIL PRESENT
none
STAFF PRESENT
Peter Patten
'Jin RubinDick nyanBetsy Rosolack
this varj.erhce, John Perl',i-ns *seconded,for J--i-r:r l{organ who abstained and Edbecaube he fett no hardsirirr existed,
Ei::i
\*
i':,'_ rYrrnure s - u/25/6u - page 2
.IIOsaid that he waYn't aware of any agreement with the christiania condos,but.that the agreement was with th6 christiania iodge, vA and the KendarLresidence. Paul ad.ded that onry one space has been deeded to one condo.He went ori to explain that the irnits h-e wanted to convert were verysmall and also that 3 units had only showers. The pran was to reduce9 units to 6- rarger units, thus impioving the guest rooms, and change2 y"itl-on the ground revel to housekeepi-ng quarters and storage. .lohnasked if a parking variance was need,ed. others did not see the needfor a parking variancer- expecially in light of the fact that there maybe a letter verifying i.he ir"rr.i"g agreement. peter and Dick felt that*l--T"{ bu good to give a pirlcing-vaiiance so the appri-cant wour-dnlrnave to come back again. -otheri felt that since paur wasnrt und.er atime duress, he did;,t neea-i-rrJt. ,,o*. Ed bragerl"""i"tnJr*'.Jiiiu.r._tion of the variance be'postponea, and Roger T. seconded. The voteto postpone consideratioi wa! unanimous.
5.Vail Associates Conditional Use permiton the Upper GoLden peqk tennis Courts to placefor the temporary structure1980-BI ski season.
Peter Patten presented the study and mentioned that it was the samerequest as last year, and the staff .*""**.taea-approvat-. Discussionfolrowed about the.parki"g st"iis cut into the bank irregalry, and thera9! ffat the parking staits-r,ua-r..t there z oi: years. Tom Harnedsaid it was vArs intention to fix. up-the bank ueyona the parking, ancr .that^the parking was supposed to be for the race personnel . Requestwas for one year at,a time, until such t,ime as VA wirr build permanentfacilities for small worrd. Co* n-a a r"liei-from pat Dodson indicatingan agreement with the Recreation District.
Dick A11is of Mano.r: vair spoke to say that they were not basically opposecto the-structure, nor to smalL Fiorldl but was ioncerned about the amountof traffic and the speed of some ot ihe trafiic in that.al:ea. rle alsomentioned the imr'act_on his pa::).:ing. He asked for a speed. bump. Gerrywhite felt that Lrre councri ;;;:-; read these minutes and receive thtrcomments. Dick fert the need for some sort of Lr:ade-off since he fetthe ski club use 4 parking "pu""". He felt thaL it was the onrir partof vail that has retained-thl charactcr that vair- s.Earted ouL to be.
Dan Corcoran moved to.approve the condi.tio'a.L use permit sri-bjec1' tothe condi-tions noLed in-itre "tiii report. Ed Drager: seconded. -nd thevote was unanimous with Roger T. abslainJlq. r
6. Setbacl< \/:ri:,nnr: {-a }.rr.r'r r -*
Peter patten presentecl the staff findings ancl the staff recon,rnendationof denial . trlarls Donalcrson showecr ptr'toi of rrarious sides, sayi'g thatthe projected aclclition v.ioula i-mpact the slte the least. The dis;cussiontna! t9]loled quesLioned the relson for putting the g;rr.'age in that posiLic:.or i1 Lhat p-lace, ancl it was gen:rarly fer-t that the garage colrfcr bemoved a litt.le to keep it witfrin the setback.
Ed Drager moved for denia)., seconcled. b), Iioger Ti] kemcier, and {_h<: votr:for denial was tnanimous.
3*iff\f*i33f;-il*ii{ui6*H;'}#*f#}# i il }y :
re,, i!,!ss
v 7. - Density ConlrfVariance and an nxterior tlf ication to constructa 2,9A0 square fo@ and a 1,100 square foot manEgA;rG3fi:,!*::t .1dgit::l-to the nasr oi ir,"-viri";;-;;";;;*n"u"iijr;;;-;;;.;c,Block 58, Vail Village tst Filing.
Jim Reuben exprained the proposar and Fred Hibberd poi-nted out thatwhen the building was constructed, alr tiafi;; -i" the village centerwas supposed to enter through the'ramp fr;;-;: ruleadow Drive. The rampwas too steep, and so was ,not used. Pioposed is a one story commerci-alspace and a managerrs apartment on seeond floor.
Jim Reuben vras 1sk-ed if the pran conformed to the urban Desigrn p].an.and he said that the urban oesign Plan dealt with one story 5ut it couldbe stretched to deal with a 2nd-story. rire height was discussed. andthe view prane was examined, and the- faci trr"i-i" 1974 a 22 space parkingvariance was granted in "*"hange for the landscaped area which is the.proposed site of the new buirding. Iribberd stated that he found itdifficult to keep the area wateied, and was continually picking trashup'from it, and felt tha.L. it did not r^rork. parL of this land would bededicated to an exclusive bus iane.
cecil Dodson, President of village center Buildi-ngs A,B, and c spoke.He felt that the 2nd story wourd cub. off the view corrid.or for 2i, 38,and 2c, 3c, 4c to the ltorlh side. He expressed support of the conceptof pedestrianization, and the lsb story (e.r"r, though the lst story vroul-dcut off his ovin yiew). He felt tha.t evln'*ot. i*portant wa.s the i.mpacton the view corridor to the south. He fert it was good Lo erimiratethe entrance with the ramp. support was for the commercial space,not the second story
More discussion about the impact of the 2nd floor fo11oirecl, with Dick,ssuggestion Lhat perhaps changes be made -ii.r l-he plans, especi;riIy in1i9ht of the fact thal the uiban Desi-gn pl..rn deals vrith onry one E;tory.
More discussj-on followed. concerning the neecl for emplcyee ho,.silg J-nthe core.
Back to i:he pran ancl the urban Desj.gn Plan calling for one sLory aclditionand one-,sm'11] pe<lestrian park. cerr:y felt t-hat a'y cirarlge fi:om thatPl-an cal'ed for rectesigning of the uibin-t.;;;; it*r,.
Ed D::ager p::oposed t:irat this wars e rnajor chairqe to the ltGp.l,an. T,irerewas lio second. Jeff hiinston had written comn,Jnts.on the plsn th;rt. wereread' The fact that it is one of trre major.r',t.i-n"o* t-o the Town andtherefore -should rema.i-n one story r+as polnted out by Gerry. Discu..;sionfolloirred conc,::rning keeping the idciitibn one story on the North, *.d1/2- story on south- . ,riir r"rirgan suqgcrstecl t-hat photos be tal-,en. rrr:edHibberd stal-ed that he didn'f. want {:o m:rke majoi changes to thc uD. p1a1and was wi-lring to go t-o one story ar.cr s:kip tnl ies:-<iential p.rt.
Ed Drager moved. Lhat the reguest be tablec-l unti,l Sept-. B, seconderl byRoget: and thc vote wers unanimous.
Roger mcrved tiiat the last.:'-tem (#g) concernj-ng Lot L, blk 3, I_,ion,s Ri<lge,l[3be tabled to sept B, seccncled by Darn cr:rcoran, vote r.,,a s unanj.*ous.
l,lovcd Lhat the rneeting be acljourrred, 2nd bv r Unan l-hloU: j
MEMORANDUI'I
TO: PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COI'il{ISSION
FROM: DEPARTIV1ENT OF COMMTJN]TY DEVELOPI"IENT
DATE: 8/19/80
RE: Addition of a 4,000 sguare foot building east of Village CenterBuilding D, located on a part of Tract C, Block 5E. VaiI VillageF.irst Filing requiring both a Density Control Variance and anExterior l,todi-f ication Approval .Applicant: Fred Hibberd
PROPOSAL
The Village Center is located in a Commercj-al Core II District,so' although it is focated adjacent to Vail Village, it will be reviewedunder the Vail Viilage and VaiL Lionshead Design Considerations. It'is, horvever, included in the Vail Village Urban Design Grride Plan,
and will be reviewed by that plan
The proposal is for a 4r00q square foot building located to theEast of Village Center Building D (on bop of the covered parkj-ng).
The 41000 square feet is to consist of 2,900 scluare feet of groundleve1 conrnercial space and a second level 11100 sqLrare foot managerrsapartment.
This proposal rnust be reviewed" under two separate processes: Densitl'Control Variance and Exterior Modification. The Densi.ty Control Varianceis needed for the 1,100 sq ft manager's urrit, since the Vj.l1aqe Centeris currently in excess of both its unit and its square footage standards.
In looking at the past history of the Vitlage Center Buildi.ng,there s/as a 22 parking space Variance granted by lihe Town Courrcil byResolution Number 12, Series of 1974. The 22 space \rariance was grantedin exchange for a landscape plaza, which is the proposed site of thenew building. We, therefore, have determined thaL this request, if
approved by the Planning Commission, will also have Lo go to the townCouncil for a Resolution amending Resolution No. 12, Series of L974.
STATISTICS
Total Land Area = 65,299 sq ft
Tota1 No. of Units Allowed: 37 units
Total No. of Units Existing z 62 units
GRFA Allowed: 52,239 sq ft
GRFA Existing: 65,038 sq ft
Conunercial Building D: 5,1-50 sq ft
' VilJ-age Center - 2 - 8-19-80
; A. EXTERIOR MODIFICATION REVIEW
N
n:f o
18.26.010
.The Commercial Core II District is intended to provide sites for a
mixture of multiple dwellings, loclges, and conunercial establishments
in a clustered, unified development. The Commercial Core fI District
is intended to .rr=or" adeguate tight, air, open space' and other amenities
appropriate to the permitied typei .f buitding and uses' and to maintain
tirl aesirable qualilies of the district by establishing appropriate site
development stindards. The Commercial Core District II is intended to
include sites for residential dwellings at densities not to exceed twenty-
five dwelling units per acre.
The proposed addition does comply with the purpose section by creaLing
another- building which would be clustered wiLh the existing development
and would actually create a more unified development. The present land-
scaped area to th-e east of Building D is and has been an eyesore and will
never function properl-y as either useable or aesthetic open space.
coMpLIANCE WITH VArL LIONSHEAD URBAN DESIGN GIlrlE PLAN AND DEgIGN CONSI-
DERATIONS
1. Sub-Area Concepts of Urban Design Guide Plan
Number 2L of the East l[eadow Drive Sub-Area Concepts describes a one
story addition of similar size to the one proposed in this r:equest.
proposed ad.dition does have a second 'slory (where the managerts unit
Lut- this second story would help to block the larger building behind
which is also specifically mentioned in Number 2I. We feel that i:he
general intent of Number 2l is being foLlowed by this request.
2. Urban Design Considerations
a. Pedestrianization: The proposed addition wil-l enhance thepedestrian experience by making the scale of the buildings a moreccmfortable one for the person walking between the TransportationCenter and Crossroads. Another part of this proposal is to rvorkwith the Town in the Construction of a pedestrian walkr"ray alongthe South side of Village Road.. This will greatly enhance the area.
b. v;jhicle Penetration: A service and drop-off area should beincorporated into the new design.
c. Streetscape Framework: This proposal will vastly improvethe pedestrian experience .
d. Street Enclosure: This building addition will i"rnprove thestreet enclosure situation by reducing the impact of the larger _r.building in the background.
e. Street Edge: The Street Edge will become slightly more regularhrhich, in this case, will enhance the ped.estrian experience.
f. Building Height: The two level proposal is well under theaLlowed building height..
S. Views: No views are impacted by this proposal.
h. Sun shade changes: Not significant.
Theis)
:.Frt-
ViJ.lage Center JS. D - 3, 8/L9/80
3. Zoning Code Considerations
The 4,000 square foot addition generates an additional parking require-
ment of approximately lt spaces, which cannot be accurately determineduntil more specific floor plans are submitted. The commercial parL of
the parking requirement would be assessed at 93r000 per space, the resi-dential at $5r000 per space.
RE..MMENDATT.NS
The Department of cormnunity Development
recommends approval of the commercial part of'the proposal as theproposal specifically orients itself to the objectives of .the Urban Desigmcuide PIan of Vail Village and the Design Considerations for Vail Lions-
head with the following conditions:
.1. The applicant. agrees to participate in and not remonstrate againsta special improvement district if and when formed for Vail Vi11age.
fn addj-tion, agrees to dedicate the land necessary for the exclusive
bus/pedestrian lane if determined by the Town as the appropriaLe
design solution for this area.
B. VARIANCE REQUEST REVIEW
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon Review of criteria and findings, Section 18.62'060 of the
cipal Code, the Department of Community Development recommends
of the reguested Variance based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors: i
1. The reLationship of the requested variance to other existing or po-
tential uses and structures in the vicinity
The current Village Center complex is 25 units and 121800 sq ft over
what is presently allowed. The only type of Density Control Variances
that we teel is acceptable is for bona fide employee housing. we
question if an l-,100 iq ft manager's apartment is bona fide employee
housing.
2. The degree to which relief from Lhe strict or litbral interpretation
and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve com-
patibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege-
We feel that a Ir100 sq ft manager's apartment would not be consistenc
with the intent of the Ordinance and could be considered a grant of
special- privilege.
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution
of popuJ-ation, transpoitation and traffic facilities, public facilities
and utilitiesr.and public safetY
None of these items are affected by this request.
Muni-
denial
'c Village Center Gn - page 4 - 8-19-80
4. Such other factors and criterj-a as the commission deems applicableto the .proposed variance.
There are no other pertjlent factors.
FINDINGS:
The Planning and EnvironmentaL Commission shalL make the followingfindings before granting a variance:
That.the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of specj_aIprivilege inconsisterit with the limitations on other propertiesclassified in the same distri_ct.
, That Lhe granting of the variance will not be detrimenLal to the publichealth, safety, or welfare. or materially injurious to propertiesor improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the foltowingreasons
The strict or literal inLerpretation and enforcement of the speci-fied regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unneces-sar:y physical hardship inconsistenL with the objectives of thistitle.
There are excepLions or extraordinary circumstances or conditionsapplicable to the site of the variance thaL do not apply generallyto other properties in the same zone.
.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specifiedregulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed bythe owners of ther properties in the same district.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION
Department of Community Development recommends denial of the requested11100 sq ft managerts apartment. Our suggestion woufa be that the
.11100 square feet be divided into two smaller units that are usedsolely for long term employee units.
Colorado
Dear Members of the Town of Vail Planning Commission,
'o
Re: Village Center Retail
ShoPs Additi.on
S incere lY t
;-,2177rut*7?red Hibberd
Viltage Center
Commercial ShoPs
o
VILLACE
CENTER
.August 20r 1980
The Town of Vail Planning Commission
Vail
&
This letter is to give information concer'ning the proposed
.addition to the v.ii-tage Center Retail Shops, The planned-
addition will be consiructed on a portion of the covered deck
east of the existing Village Center Shops.
The history of this deck goes bacJ." to April cjf Lg74. At this
time, plans were approved by the Town of Vail under Resolution
Nunrber 12, 1974 Lo tonstruct a lanclscaped plaza area in lieu of
22 parking spaces, which woulcl have been reguired. on the deck.
as iart oi tire 1980 VaiI Village urban design p1.anr, commercial
expinsion is being proposed according to the plans being pre-
""i-tted. In addition, f will be making land available to the
Town of Vail for the pedestrian loop on the north side of
Village Center, and for Lhe torvn bus route on the northeast
section of the Village Center property.
These changes will most likely require an amendment to Resolution
Number 12 series ot L974, Th; iniention here is to still provide
a landscaped plaza area. The plaza itself will contain planters
on the southeist side of the p1aza. The concrete section of the
deck will be covered with paver bricks. And in the center of the
plaza will be additional planters to round out the landscaping.
A11 of the changes mentioned above are an effort to make improve-
ments according to the urban design plan, which should result in
a more pleasing and a more functional answer to the area.
o
PLANNING A}iD ENVTRONMENTAL COMMISSION
. AGENDA
Monday, August 25. 1980 3:00 P.M.
1. Approval- of minutes of August 11, 1980.
2. Exterior Modification to the Lionshead Gondola Building.
3. Setback varianqe to buiLd a deck on Lot 1, Block 8, Vail Village7th Fiting.
4. Christiania Lodge Parking Variance to alfow a 2800 square foot' addition.
5. Vail Associates Conditionui U"" Permit to place temporary structureon the uPper Golden Peak Tenn'is Courts for the 1980-1981 ski season.
6. Setback Variance to build an addit.ion onto an existing residence onLot 34, Block 1, Vail Meadows Subdivision, Filing 1.
7, Density Controtr Variance and an Exterior Modification toconstruct a 2,900 square foot commercial space and a 11100square foot managrerrs apartment addition to the East of theVilJ.age Cent,er D Building, Tract C, Block 58, Vail Vi11a9elst Filing.
8. Special Development District reguest for Lot 1, Block 3,tion I s Rid.ge Subdivision, Fil ing No. 3 .
(The Owner has requested that thj-s item be tabled, to the
September 8, L980 Planning and Environrnental Connnission meeting.)
To be published in the Vail Trail on I'riday' August 22, 1980.
"!q
o
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING AIvD ENVIRONMENTAL COMI{ISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMTNITY DEVELOPI'{ENT
DATE: 8/I9180
RE: Addition of a 4,000 square foot building east of Vil-lage CenterBuilding D, located on a part of Tract C, Block 5E, Vail VillageFirst Filing requiring both a Density Control Variance and anExterior l'lodif ication Approval .Applicant: Fred Hj_bberd
';PROPOSAI
The Village Center is located in a Commercial Core II District,so, although it is located adjacent to VaiI Vi1lage, it will be reviervedunder the VaiI Village and Vail Lionshead Design Considerations. Itis, however, included in the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plant
and will be reviewed by that plan.
The proposal is for a 4,000 square foot building located to theEast of Village Center Building D (on top of the covered parking).
The 4,000 square feet is to consist of 2,900 square feet of groundlevel commercial space and a second levet 11100 square foot managerrsapartment.
This proposal must be reviewed uuder two separate processes: Densi-tyControl Variance and Exterior ModificaLion. The Density Control Varianceis needed for the I,I00 sq ft managerrs unit, since the Village Centeris currently in excess of both its unit and its square footage standards.
In looking at the past history of the Village Center Building,there was a 22 parking space Variance granted by the Town Council byResolution Number 12, Series of 1974. The 22 space variance was grantedin exchange for a landscape p1aza, which is the proposed site of the
new building. We, therefore, have determined that this request, if
approved by the Planning Commission, will also have to go to the TownCouncil for a Resolution amending Resolution No. L2, Series of L974.
STATISTICS
Tota1 Land Area = 65,299 sq ft
Total No. of Units Al1owed.:
Total No. of Units Existing:
37
62
ft
fr
sg ft
units
units
GRFA Allowed:
GRFA Existing:
52,239 sq
65,038 sg
Commercial- Building D: 5,160
Village Center nfo - 2 - 8-1e-80
A. EXTERIOR MODIFICATION REVIEW
compi,raNca wrtu p-unposn sEcfroN 18.26.0I,0
The Commercial Core II District is intended to provide sites for a
mixture of multiple dwellings, lodges, and conrnercial establishments
in a clustered, unified d.evelopment. The Commercial Core II District
is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open sPace, and other amenities
appropriate to the permitiecl types of building and uses, and to maintair
tir6 aesirable qualilies of the district by establishing appro.oriate sit3
development stindards. The Commercial Core District 1I is intended to
incl-udl sites for residential dwellings at densities not to exceed tr';en;y-
five dwelling-units per acre.
The proposed addition does comply with the purpose section by creating
another building which would be clustered with the existing cevelopment
and would actually create a more unified development. The present lani-
scaped area to t,hE nast of Building D is and has begn an eyesore and will
never function properly as either useable or aesthetic open sPace'
COMPLIANCE WITH VATL LIONSHEAD URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN AND DESIGN CONSI'
DERATlONS
1. Sub-Area Concepts of Urban Design Guide Plan
Number 2L of the East Meadow Drive Sub-Area Concepts describes a one
story ad.dition of similar size to the one proposed in this request. The
proposed addition does have a second story (where the rnanager's unit is)
but this second story would help to block the larger building behind' it
which is also specifically mentioned in Nurnber 21 . We feel that the
general intent of Number 2l is being folfowed by this request.
2" Urban Design Considerations
a. Pedestrianization: The proposed. addition will enhance thepedestrian experience by making the scale of the buildings a morecomfortable one for the person walking between the TransportationCenter and Crossroads. Another part of this proposal is to workwith the Town in the Construction of a pedestrian walkway alongthe South side of Village Road. This will greatly enhance the area.
b. Vbhicle Penetration: A service and drop-off area shoutd beincorporated into the new design.
c. Streetscape Framework: This proposal will vastly improvethe pedestrian experience.
d. Street Enclosure: This building addition wilJ_ improve thestreet enclosure situation by reducing the impact of the largerbuilding in the background.
e. Street Edge: The St.reet Edge will become slightly more regula:which, in this case, will enhance the pedestrian experience.
f. Building Height: The two lel'el proposal is well under theallowed building height,.
g. Views: No views are impacted by this proposal.
h. Sun shade changes: Not significant.
Village center JV. D - 3 | B/L9/80
3. Zoning Code Considerations
. The 4,000 square foot addition generates an additional parking require-
ment of approximately 11 spaces, which cannot be accurately determineduntil more specific floor plans are submitted. The commercial part ofthe parking reguirement would be assessed at $3,000 per space, the resi-dential at $5,000 per space.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Department of Conununity Development
recommends approval of the commercial part of the proposal as the
proposal specifically orients itself to the objectives of the Urban Design
Guide Plan of Vail Village and the Design Considerations for Vail Lions-
head with the following conditions:
1. The applicant agrees to participate in and not remonstrate againsta speci-al improvement district if and when formed for Vail Vi1lage.
In additiori, agrees to dedicate the }and necessary for the exclusive
bus/pedestrian lane if determined by the Town as the appropriate
design solution for this area.
B. VARIAI{CE REQUEST REVIEW
CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
upon Review of criteria and findings, section 18.62.060 of the
cipaf Code, the Department of Communi.ty Development recommends
of the requested Variance based upon the following factors:
Consideration of Factors:
Muni-denial
1. The rel-ationship of the request,ed variance to other existing or po-
tential uses and structures in the vicinity:
The current Village Center complex is 25 units and 12,800 sq ft over
what is presently al-lowed. The only type of Density Control Variances
that we feel is acceptabl-e is for bona fide ernployee housing. -weguestion if an 11100 sq ft manager's apartment is bona fide employee
housing.
2. The degree to which relief from the strict or lj-teral interpretation
and enforcement of a specifiecl regulation is necessary to achieve com-
patibiJ-ity and uniformity. of treatment among sites in the vicinity or
lo attain the objectives of this title wj-thout grant of special privil.ege.
We feef that a 11100 sq ft managerls apartment vrould not be consistenc
with the intent of the Ordinance and could be considered a grant of
special- privilege
3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution
of population, transpoitation and traffic facilities, public facilities
and utilities, and public safetY.
None of these items are affected by this request.
vil.lase center Gn - page 4 - 8-19-Bo O
4. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable
. to the proposed variance.
There are no other pertinent factors.
FINDINGS:
The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the followingfindings before granting a variance:
. That the granting of the variance will not constituLe a grant of specialprivilege inconsistent with the limitations on other propertiesclassified in the sanre district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the publichealth, safety, or welfaref or materialry injurious to propertiesor improvements in the vicinity.
That the varj-ance is warranted for one or more of the followingreasons:
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speci-fied regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unneces-. sary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of thistitle.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditionsapplicabJ-e to the site of the variance that do not apply generallyto other properties in the same zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specifiedregulation worrld deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed bythe owners of ther properties in the same district.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION-
Department of Community Development reconmends den:i-al of the requested1.100 sq ft manager's apartment. Our suggestioi-ioutd be that the1.100 sguare feet be divided into two smaller units that are usedsolely for long term employee units.
o 'a
Re: Village Center Retail
Shops Adclition
SincerelY t
j/)'.,/Z)zrl*7
tsred Hibberd.Village Center
Commercial ShoPs
a.!
VILLACE
CEIT.JTER
Tf
i:
,&
August 20f 1980
The Town of Vail Planning Commission
VaiI
Colorado
Dear Members of the Tovrn of Vail Planning Commission,
This letter is to give information concerning the proposed
addition to the Village Center Retail Shops. The planned-
addition will be consiructed on a portion of the covered deck
east of .the .existing Village center Shops.
The history of this deck goes back to Apr:il of 1974. At this
time, plans were approved by the Town of Vail under Resolution
Number-12, I974 Lo construcl a landscaped plaza area in lieu of
22 parking spaces, rvhich would have been required on the deck.
As part oi tfre 19b0 Vail Village urban design plan, conmercial
e>rpansion is being proposed according to the plans being pre-
sented, In addition, I will be making land available to the
Town of Vail for the pedestrian loop on the north side of
Village.Center, and for the town bus route on the northeast
section of the Village Center property,
These changes will nrost Likely require an amendment to Resolution.
Number 12 ieries of 1974, The intention here is to still provide
a landscaped plaza area. The plaza itself will contain planters
on the southelst side of the plaza. The concrete section of t^re
deck will be covered with paver bricks. And in the center of the
plaza will be additional planters to round out the landscaping.
A11 of the changes mentioned above are an effort to make improve-
ments according to the urban design p1an, which should result in
a more pl-easing and a more functional answer to the area.
'I aI
-iou;
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE 15 HERBBY GIVBN that Fred Hibberd has requested a
DensiLy Control Variance and an Exterior Modification j-n order to
construct an addition to the East of the Village Center D Buildins
containi\g 2,900 square feet of commercial spa'ce and a 11100 square
foot manag:er's apartment. Said property is part of Tract c' Block ,
5E, Vail Village lst Filing and is located in the commercial core :
II (CCII) zone District.
Application has been made in accordance with sections 18.26.045
and 18.62-O2O of the Vail Municipal Code.
APublicHearingwillbeheldinaccordancewithsection
18.66.060 of the Municipal code on August 25, 1950 at 3:00 p.m.
before the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission'
said hearing will be held in the vail Municipal Building.
The application and information relating to the proposed
change j-s available in the Zoning Administrator's office d'urj-ng
regiular business hours for review or inspection by the public'
.fim Rubin
Zoning Administrator
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMT,NITY DEVELOPIVIENT
Published in the Vait Trail , August 8, 1980.
'rq
:,
APPLICATTON FORM FOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS OR
MODIFICATIONS IN COMMERCIAL CORE I (CCI)
I. This procedure is required for alteration of an existing building which
aclds or removes any enclosed floor area or outdoor patio or replacement
of an existing building shall be subject to review by the Planning andEnvironmental Commission.
The application will not be accepted untit aIl information is submitted.
].. NAME OF
ADDRESS
APPLTCANT Tt*J H.LL,J
2.NAME OF APPLICANTIS
ADDRESS
3. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER
REPRESENTATIVE l4on{-
PHONE
4.
SIGNATURE Sc....-.+ 4..< 4l^ove
ADDRESS
LOCATION
ADDRESS:
PHONE
OF PROPOSAI
HoNE ?s) '7tY)}vB
'
(r//
LEGAI DESCRIPTION
, Tott'"'.r& C)"., /
.f,to"l({F Us, I U,llt
Gc..{-7 oS F--?Le S+.1€
+
T' .s f T,'l i-,q
a L Calo rac(o I
/r4 s. FEE 9100
6. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF PROPERTY SHOWING PROPERTY LINES AND LOCATION
OF BUILDING AND ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE LAND
II Four (4) copies of a site plan containing the following imformation:
A. The site plan shalL be drawn on a sheet size of 24" x 36" at ascale of 1" = 20t; a variation of the sheet size or scale may be
approved by the Community Development Department Department if justified;
B. The date, north arrow, scale and name of the proposed developmentsha]I be shown on the site planl
C. The existing topographic character of the site including existing
and proposed contours. This condition will only be reguired for an
expansion area where there is a change of two feet of grade;
D. The location and size of aII existing and proposed buildings,
structures and improvements;
I I <l
^/
C""J
lr'r'.-, 'n
nOt),4*+ /( /
-)Ld-tt-'*r.t*77
)t)'l a'4-'i/\
-l' ,, n- A-T c
)]r d;L 1 r/r s
o
President Dick F.itzgerald
Kiandra/Ta1 isrnan LodgeP.O. Box 1028Vail , Col-orado 81657
l,[r. Karl Heinz FaesEler .-Box 700 \>s'r.-r*--L 17Vail, Colorado 81657 I
llerv LapinSuite 3918
Crossroads143 East Meadow DriveVaiI, Colorado 81557
o
r, irt A-t- //*cre"'
ll']xry" /--*n ' /t T) o-Ft., ,,
,/ llt'-t(' 1o 6"x G67
,C
(r
L
'/,'-
t 8oh
-/ )''
"-"'--
n
/\)1 "\ t'/6 c-h a--
t* B^J
l)uJ &--blz'V"^7
4ta - lstl>
Itt"^ fu/ /s-+<^"y'.-,lo 7k "Ir">aVvu
f)t'u'-'; * -l| (-a,/l
[/(.t' , ,rL1v r1o"
a\
S o^n^ n \(.,'
%r',.0
, Cu( )o'
-; r:"?1
tof "
)i.*/:- tt e r/
f*,r/ tAu^/
,r, [,*/;-//
n0
[t I
Project Application
y''- \lr Ill tl/ /', .\-/
/r^3/
' /r/
-
Proiect Name:
Proiect DescriPtion:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architecr Address and phon€: 6tt t Fwp,g
Lesal Description, ,o, A , alo"x {E , ,r,^n trf / 9 f
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
//9r P ,82 fihtqt
_-\-----l-aI
r
vuaee (Elr€e--)Dnd
f,-ePa*
---CtwWW - Alt .tqtt &?p(fuet asael -*
' &{* l*ateo 8so /
frihfo gmf L
'tileef dfs
furrln- llasr &f w pe#ueav ffi
Llsl' oi: I{A'IIililAl,s
NAMri oF pRoJEcr 1,1//ono /ar
ON:ffiTEGAL DESCRIPTI
NESCRIPTION OF PRO]ECT
The following infornation is
Board before a final approval
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Roof
Siding
Other Wall Materials
Fascia
Soffits
Windows
Window Trin
Doors
Door Trin
Hand or Deck Rails
F lues
F lashings
Chinneys
Trash Encl osures
Greenhous es
Other
PLANT MATERIALS(Vegetative, Landscaping
Botanical Name
required for subrnittal by
can be given:
. Typ.e of l,,laterial '
the applicant to the Design Review
Color'
B.
r^f ? tt r / (/-^ /-)
atouJ=,- h' ,r(L //4
and Ground CoverJMaterials including Trees,
Conunon Name
/o
4ak+/
Size
--:-ltl2v'2'
.o
c. olJr.ER .L{NpscAP,E FEAI'URES
(Retaining Wal1s, Fences, Swinming Pools, etc.) Please specify.
\
o
DESI
NAME OF PROJECT
C'I.I REVITJW BOARD CIIECK LIST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT
A. BuildingConsiderations
BLOCK
PreIin. Final
Approval Approv.al_
F IL ING
Corunent s
Bldg location on site
Bldg Configuration
Appropriateness with
Neighborhood
Height
Mass
Roof Forms
Use of Materials
Choice of Color
Energy EfficiencY
B. Site Consideration
Disturbance of
Natural Features
Snow Removal
Access onto Site
Vehicular and Pedes-
trian circulation
Landscaping Plan
Grading 6 Drainage
Erosion Control
Irigation SYSten
Exterior Lighting
Retaining Walls
Accessory StTuctures
C. Miscellaneous Cons iderat ions
D,Other Conments
FINAL /TI,PROVAL
Dat c Signat urcl
lntun
box 1O0
yail, colorado 81657
(3031 476€Et* z ao,>
department of community development
Dear Design Review Board Applicant:
Enclosed is your Design Review Board Project Application shorvingthe approval ,/disapproval of your project including comments fromthe Board.
If you received approval from the Design Review Board, you mustmake any corrections stipulated by the Board and bring the revisedpJ-ans to the Town Planner before applying for a Building Permit.No site work may be commenced until the revisions are approved bythe Town Planner and two sets of working drawings are submittedto the Building Department.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to cal1 theTown Planner at .476-7000, ext. 236
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
l. "./
Project Application
o^," 6=/. zi nS/
Proiect Name:
Project Description:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Descriptio n: rct P , aloct X , riting
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board /4/r---7-_
Motion by:
Seconded by:
DISAPPROVAL
Summary:
a-
)r
I
Chiel Building Official
n-+^. iDate:
Zoning Administrator
rl
i{Y.
1$
J
$':
dtt
It
rir\'
\ \:,
*r*:\$
a,q\
,MrNt ou n"lorNc AND u*ur*o*tro" "otrssroN MBETTNG
I,IEMBERS PRESENT
Gerry White
John Perkins
Dan Corcoran
Ed Drager
Roger Tilkemeier
Gaynor Miller
Ji:n Morgan
Morrday, october 13, 1980 3:00 P.M.
COL]NCIL ME}IBER
BiLI Wilto
STA!'F PRESENT
Dick RYan
'Jin RubinPeter Patten
Betsy Rosolack
F
The meeting \,vas called to order by Gerry White. Dan Corcoran moved the
minutes of the Sept g meeting be approved, seconded by Ed Drager.
5-0 in favor (JIm Morgan and Gayrror Mitler hadn't arrived yet).
2. Miskell greenhouse addition, Lct 2, Block 2, Vail Village 13Lh'
setLrack variance request.
Peter patten presented the staff's feelings as written in the memo mailed
to the Commission, recommending denial . Whitney Miskelt distributecl more
information including a letter from the neighbor to the east apploving
the greenhouse. nan Co::coran felt it would be a positive addiLion to
a veiy plain East side of the house. John Perkins saicl he was the original
designer, and although he wor.rld abstain fron the vote, agreerl with Dan.
Roger T. moved that the variance be appsoveg, Dan seconderl it. The vote
wai 3 in favor, 1(Gerry) against. Gaynor-a6sLained, since he did not hear
the discussion.
3. Add,ition to vj.llage C*.ter BuikfnS_gr--rgcr
Apf rS va-r-r--Be vlg e q--E rolge a I .
Jim Rubin said a survey had been- completed to see if the proposal
would interfere with the bus lane, and explained the differences in thisproposal. Ile pointed out the 5 conditions lj-sted jn the rnemo that the
staff wanted to see implemented if approval was granted. Ile felt that
the plan tvas in basic conformance with the VaiI ViIIage Urban Design Guide
Plan and Vail Lionshead Urban Design Considerations. The 2 smaller units
that were reqested by the staff in the original proposal were discussed.
Cecil Dodson, president of Village Center Condominiumn Association, Bldgs
ArB & C questi.oled approval of twice the square footage as Proposed in
the Urban Design Guide P1an. Dick Ryan replied that. the Urban Design Guide
Pl-an d.j-d not dictate exact p1ans, but was a guide only. Mr. Dodson protestt:
the traro stories, but stated that he appr:oved the improvement of the area.
John Perkins felt that the massing helped to make the transition frorn one
story to the present two story buil<1ing. l,lr. Dodson asked if it was worked
wiLhj.n the Urban Design Guide Plan. Gerry White replied that, the UDGP
provided the guide. Dick adcted that Jcff Winston had reviewed thi;., proposal
presented the first time, but not the 2nd one. John P. questioned the
landscaping of the area to the east, and if the owners would worlc vrith Jeff
of\ that. I'red Hibberd. replied he rvould, adding that the lst plan had t'he
same fooi:p::int, then he tried to please others by cl-ranging the elevations.
In doing so, one owner had to excltanqe l\i.s view for additional space.
.. : f." - 2 aol1sl8D
Fred Hibberdrs statements on the 5 condiLions were:
, l-. he wasntt looking for a condo to market\ 2. he'd Like to continue to to work further with 'Jeff winston3. the bus lane does encroach onto his property, but, it and the walkway
work well and he will dedicate the necessary land for them4. agrees with this5. agrees with this
Ed Drager didn't agree with havingl a second story, since a I story was
shown in the UDGP. ,John Perkins stated that the design cannot be setat the :scale of l"=200', nor square footage specified. Gaynor Miller feltthat in working with Fred for L-L/2 months, that this was.a much better
design and that it would blend in very well, adding that the Town needsbuses and walks and a compromise should be made. Roger T. added that thelocation was very visible and that when the commission had visited thesite that they had. agreed that a one story building didn't look rightat that location. cerry agreed and stated that he felt it was in keepingwith the UDGP.
Roger moved for approval subject to the 5 conditions in the memo, John
seconded- Vote vras 4 in favor, 2 against. (Dan & Ed against). Jim abstainesince he didn't hear the fu}1 discussion.
4. A Conditonal Use Request for the Covered Bridge Store to a11ow theconversiqn of one aprtment form Reside-ntial to Comme.rcial ._-
/'- Jim Rubin surnrned up the memo, stating that the staff was in favor of
approval , for the reasons stated in the memorandum. Ed Drager asked how
one could. say that there is no way one can keep people living in thecore area--did that mean no one wanted to live there? He felt it wasinconsistent with the prior case where the staff is insisting that an apart.go in to nake something look better because people will want to live there.Jim Rubin felt that the apartments were in two different locations,This one is right across from 2 night clubs with more commotion at thislocation.
John Dobson stated that Bridge Street is a heavily traveled area in Vail' Uses of this type have been granted. In the early days, it macle sense,but doesrr't now to any where near the degree. Gorsuch, the Bank building,etc. have done the sane thing. There are perhaps two long term spacesin the core, and precedent has been establis,hed. Long term has notworked out. Dan Corcoran . then add.ed that the Town is being
sued by a property owner who considered just the opposite, that his pr:oper-ty was quite valuabIe, namely the tower over the Rucksack. They certainlywouldn't want that conversion. He stated that he was on the Planning
Comnission when the conversion came through with the apartments that
used. to be above the Liguor Store and he opposed that.
John Dobson asked ifconditionaluses were granted to the Ore House Btr:"lding,the Cyrano buildingr oE for Gorsuch. He repeated that the precedent
had been established and that long term housing simply does not workout in that area as it once did. He read the purpose of the CCI zonedistrict.
Jim Rubin reiterated one.statement that John D had made, that thereare no controls that would reguire those units to be long tenn. Johncould rent them out short term.
ot
.:n:" -. r rlszao O
Gerry'White stated that the history of downtown Vail had been one ofboth granting and denying use for just, this kind of thing. There isthe concept of horisontal zoning that was dealt with a long time agoin an effort to keep the mixture"in the downtown area. He stated thatthe was much more conversion to commerciaL space on every level, withtalk of the Gashof Gramshammer being convert,ed to commercial spacethroughout. He felt that this \^7as a sort of death knel1 for the corearea.. He felt very strongly that commercj.al space shourd be on ground.level and the second level should be residential.
Bill Wilto mentioned that one prior cond.itional use was granted becauseit was felt that no one wanted to li.ve there, but the fact was, therenters enjoyed the apartment, so it was suitable for some. "Notdesirable housing" he felt was incorrecc,.
There was some talk of asking John to restrict John Dobsonrs otherapartment to employee housing if this conditional use were granted,but it was felt that conditional use had nothing to do with employeehousing, and John felt also that that rure should have ueen apitiiato others as wel1, if the commission was going to expect it oi-him.
Gaynor Miller moved to approve the reguest, John perkins secondedit. Gaynor voted for it, but the other mernbers voted against, so thevote was 2 -5 against.
5. ReqUest for a f ronl- sol-h:r:k rrari anca far .Torrrr (:ir.+ +,.\ /r,'\hd+tsrr^-
Peter Patten presented the material from the staff, and. recommended.deniar. steve Boydl the contractor for the project, explaining thatthe owner wanted a covered parking area where he now hab gravel parking,that was encroaching 6'or 7r onto the setback. John perkins fell thatto deny this didn't make sense, and discussion followed about whetherit was better esthetically to permit a garage to hide the cars completely.
John moved to grant the variance as long as a garage \^ras constructed,seconded by Roger. The vote was tied with Dan-abslainirrg. John,Roger.,and Jim Morgan for, Gaynor, Gerry and Ed against.
Roger moved to deny the carport, seconded by Gaynor.For denial were.rim, Gaynor, Gerry and Ed.- John and Roger againstdenj-al-. Request denied..
5. ^leighg ele+qmgq_t for Special Development District 4 (SD4), theCascade Lodge
Jim Rubin presented. the mateti-al from the staff, and recommended approval.He explained that the design seemed approprj_ate and t.hat the incrLasewould only be one foot. Andy Norris snowea drawings.
Roger moved for approval subject to the pranning and Environmentalcommission's granting of the Amendment to the l{eight section of sD4.Ed seconded., and. Lhe vote was 6-0, unanimous, Dan abstaining.
Request for a. front setback variance for Jerry Gart to constructa carpol!
._ PEc - r0f-80 a
7. Amendments to Zoning Ordinances
o
Audience participation was requested first, George Boyer, Betty Thomas,Mason Thomas, John Drywalker, Paula Lallier, Andy Norrisr.stewart Brown,Charl-ie Powers, Fitzhugh Scott, Joe l"lontana, Stuart Holland, DeanCanada, and Kathy Warren spoke in opposition to the amendments. Theirconcern dealt with the fact that they thought their property was beingdevalued, some felt the decision was arbitraryr son€ felt a-40E slopeshould be built upon. sandy Mi11s took exception and stated that allshe could hear was "you are taking from me" instead of looking'at thedesj-rability of these changes for the whole valley and being posiLive.
Afterwardr the commission members stated their feelings:
Ed Drager: Many of these ideas have been discussed for a long time.
We must have done many th.ings right.
Dan: As the document is now, Itm against not count.ing the 40A. Infavor of ne\,t definitions of GRFA, for proposecl changes in density control.
Jilm: Height well taken care of, hillside development questionable.
GRFA not greatly changed, against not eounting 40t, for section IV.
.rohn: Doesnrt feel density contror section needs to be changed fromvshat it is now. Height limitation have been scared of; footprint fine,at'one tirne had 30? as cut-off point, GRFA - careful-- sometimessecondary unit would be cut down to be very sma11 unit.
Roger: Our concern is to get a document to control visual impact,we need more work done. However, r get concerned about all commentson values. rf one had bought property even 6-8 months ago, one wouldhave experienced an increase j-n value. I agree t.hat it is importantthat values continue.
Gerryr we are primarily dealing with space. r feel 40t slope shouldnot be omitted. I like GRI'A. Concern about values.
Roger moved to table the meeting to october 2zr ,rohn seconded itUnanimous, 6-0 (Gaynor had left).
Roger was selected to attend. the DRB meeting on Oct. 15.Ed moved arrd Roger seconded to contj-nue the rest of the agenda untirthe next meeting.
C)try'
GK +tr 6,s st,G".-.,s-a -/ t, 16A6^">,
Uot 9lt,ep-^-!a*ri -- 6 s, x:1 t'w1
3 Sr Ab''J')o
3?.!I^'!
^b"-
D^
_8 rw*g al S-16
?g U-1/.,-,) ?K,o8) 6>,o3&
2A,- X-
&ArA c.- .-
tA ft+re- 37,6-U- )trA c.- .- ,tt/ t2 I
'8. The existing and proposed landscaping;
F. The localion of all existing and proposed buildings, structures
%r- and, p'*' os ov de'-Fe
III. The applicant shall submit ir, "titt"n and graphic form, a pre-
ponderance of evidence before the Planning and Environmental
Conunission. that" the proposal is in conformance with the purposes
of the CCI,Disitrict and that the proposal substantially complieswith the Vail Village'Urban Design ffi Plan.
A. If the applicant is proposing a major change in the VaiI Village
Urban Design Guitde Plan, the procedures for change are noted inSection L8.24.220 (B.).
Iv. The applicant must also submit written and graphic supporting. materials that the proposal substantially complies with the following' Urban Design Considerations section of the Vail Village'DesignConsideration?r@ _ .-l
A. PedestrianizationB. Vehicle PenetrationC. Streetscape FrameworkD. Street EnclosureE. Street EdgeF. Building Heightc. ViewsH. Sun Shade Consideration
Many of the above items should be addressed in some graphic meansusing such tools as sketches, simulations, models (including
neighboring buildings) photos, etc.
V. The Town of VaiII Zoning Code for CCI also describes other zoningissues that the applicant must respond to in written or graphic form.
VI . Applications for exterior alterations or modifications in CCI canbe received up to July 31, 1980. After that date, the time framesnoted in Section 18.24.065-A-5 apply.
oo
PT'BLIC NOTICE
NOTICE fS HEREBY GM{ that Fred llibberd has reguested a
Density Control Variance and an Exterior Modification in ord.er to
construct an addition to the East of the Village Center D BuiJ_djng
containing 2,900 sguare feet of conunercial space and a 1,100 square
foot managerrs apartment. Said property is part of Tract C, Block
58, Vail Village Ist Filing and. is l-ocated in the Commercial Core
II (CCII) Zone District.
Application has been made in accordance with Sections 18.26.045
and l-8.62"020 of the Vail Municipal Code.
A Public Hearing will- be held in accordance with Section
18.66.060 of the Municipal Code on August 25, 1960 at 3:00 p.m.
before the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission.
Said hearing will be held in the Vail l.[unicipal Building.
The application and information relating to the proposed
change is available in the Zoning Administrator's office during
regular business hours for review or inspection by the public.
Jin Rubin
Zoning Adrninistrator
TOWN OF VAIL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMT]NITY DEVELOPIT,IENT
Published in the Vail Trail , August 8, 1990.
VILLACE
CENTER&
August 20, 1980
The Town of Vail Planning CommissionVail
Colorado
Dear Memberis of the Town of Vail Pl-anning Commission,
This letter is to give information concerning the proposedaddition to the Village Center Retail Shops. The plannedaddition will be consbuucted on a portion of the covered deckeast of the existing ViJ-J-age Center Shops,
The history of this deck goes back to April of 1974. At thistime, plans were approved by the Town of VaiI under ResolutionNumber L2, 1974 to construct a landscaped plaza area in lieu of22 parking spaces, which would have been reguired on the deck.As part of the 1980 Vail Village urban design pl.an, commerciaLe:r;ransion is being proposed according to the plans being pre-sented. Ir addition, I wiLl be making land available to theTown of VaiI for the pedestrian loop on the norttr side ofVillage Center, and for the town bus route on the northeastsection of the Village Center property.
These changes wilL most liket-y reguire an amendment to ResoLutionNumber 12 series of 1974, The intention here is to still providea landscaped plaza area. The plaza itsel_f wilI contain planterson the southeast side of the plaza. The concrete section of thedeck will be covered with paver bricks. And in the center of theplaza will be additional pLanters to round out the landscaping.
All- of the changes mentioned above are an effort to make improve-ments according to the urban design plan, which should result ina more pJ-easing and a more functional answer to tbe area.
Sincerely,
Re: Village Center Retail-
Shops Addition
/=u/%,a 6./'
Fred HibberdVillage Center
Commercial Shops
O
I
I
\ii'/TSil
\',Y
t\\..1
gE
ots(:(J
r, l.lu^
(,
crqe
n.i2..)Z
O.{c.>ai.4(,'a
'E9O''. c Z,
slol:'| :1 us
^l ?, a!;l ca
,_t .aol a zalil t- ha
d*oo
t>ro !i,
AA
F
irFI
(r-
tOrr6 trA..t (,
at
I >O
9UO.J,a .
xa
:^X!
6ixr3l
qt
c, rer 'itaaa)
aita
Li(r4 0
c;: o I
.{;o.
,{c 9
oeljuijt. '1,r: r'r r:iarnt
-o u
oq
o
:r.J I q
,9 li ,' ,i
9,r I o
El I
itil : s,Ei'n, !l{:l i "Z-,"ii .,n :l:l I i;lrli Eu .il$ I : :!trE I; iFl l :;r;;e ;s rtl e iilqli
A; ill ; i;1.!., .2.. :-l '" ti'-'ui J;i ;El l i;ii'liii3ii iili *irgli" llEr :-jl ,? i;iii:qi:;t i:l :;sxiii;j;;l ' ?Fl i ;3iti;: {;i I qil s :r-ll'ii iij6 ;Bl fItj.iiiy-ii'i -r iill ^r. iri ':;."; ;rri d i$l iiji ri;ir:; :lr': il ill iil ii;,::;iii ;['.::i o,t ttt1 t,tu t'.iti ,,-ro,',. f, iit -{ l,'r i1'l t Ii ll !l r ;ii-t,*:I L ll fr ;di:'iir
.46OQ
'EO(,
oo
0
c.i
i >,.4
l.: ,'l
o2AA
2l:,qo
?1:E4
ota
tr
q
2
E
I
c.
(,
'..
r.l
rcq: o'a c'^- ? uEO tr O-i Cl5 i)F!r.,a !: 't o
. -o i, aJ r.o4'JE trt)lJo ,rJ-|^
l) .a o -t!ol|l c -!jrruue U 11 ./11.1 g
.i O:_: < C .i.r d o._ o;r, ! ;a L" ,:: ! 6 *, +r 9.4LL;-r,:a o>> t,i <c i.: 1, o>1:(J.:i:ro i/rst.r u d- a, t -:'-).i aO=!e-rFa u1.4 'i !'r4rJ:1 ::,a.lhsj aia cJcrii;i -.:: o :: r! q c ui:j:c-L trooq ua il i.: o tr -ctJ:l''-:(Jv (' rt.e
^ :r -;a:a;: :croL '{;.- P ;;ti:: ,, 9 " j; 3'r9 'A i- ':J-.::-!! (. dqu.JZ';t- a.r a.: Oq Ct 6 ta.-; ;:i a. o o > (:':.1:il .tr l:". ': o r i: o9::-:O:: c "99 4Ir ;o!-:...< .ii: -!3i:., :;-i,1::c: (:6 '.{a.:: 7J>i(::-::O .Fdr 'ri l|,:: tt::,,::i* 1.,?4i:365 lrit-::'-t" io!J:i.4
r_'! L) ra 'ii::lH cr I L lrij- -:hi:-:i r': ir;i 3ec a1i.:,; a.r. .r w-i Y j.
- a);.H(, !l -: _.':'r r' 31il.:,:::.i r 'r-- c | .:1..' -.: !r:i U ;r'il.i-::. (t . t/i .r.1i;:. ;. .: a:: Ll i: . r: rroi: :4.-:H < rr'riri.l- I..;i.' ) t_l r! '. e :: c'!r.:::-::'l .-: r 'iJ!a d;:;;:. H rr . ;' o'j: -l,r i: f - o :t r' ;r<!.atl()I ::.1 .qi rrvLO:! |(r r{ r. :.(rJ(:r'!'Qt: a:..1_ ('| ri, C.J (, t: ti tlgii l.. (2"1 "'A 'r u'; 'l,u, C, C)rr().\iOOAio3arar9+r
JI -.lij'\r-l+! \\l:
\J.
-'
t
I
n
I
o
rJ ol| !:o I€ li ri = !loa , ol(ur'r cl:(r o o oF
!t { ol:
,-riu n oll,.-r .-r lrl ii !) 9 O l:
oo€1.:l> u.-r J r{l
q>9!lc:: I.c c a-j ul.Jt-.i c it
Cr+ ,{i:= rr '91.,i.JC J I
i: o cJ ''l
Ft:cc{.,
!o 9.1
l: ::
t: r: ti lj
!: g'rts
O
I
II
t.
l"
tt
t8LO1.{
l=
IE
IE
oal o
:t <t t g.J ai .t
i,-t 6 c
io tJ6a.r .< i. 2.
.Ji!a 92.
= a c. at ot::4 'j.) -JOraJ c, .1 ='.!.... O d O !l
'... ti.3 e7c:., a,: c (. il.'itcr \)c!:O.'l AA
,i =C.2 70 0do!92 ^tt,J ..) -4;. !)9 d (, ct9 r:tt itllrt oa E t'5 i1C O:'t:) E ']i!ra C, O- r !, -:!. t':ar e ir O oial (j
^=a) :rli ! '.t u:i !. Er ..r ,rc|! ..(',1;
:: Ero o|-a a.A -Cd.- -c or.. : a, 9!C - =.).JJ6 €
" og I t7
r;
Fl,}
a4<
i.OF
'^ = ,'r
or
>gl
<c4
!l
I
nar*ir g":l ;ur-:;:uii;i;ia:i,qi U*
:;tlaig ifi; ; ii'ili ili;s;ii: ti,,:i :iH
ii+i:rt li;i ; it:i; i :i|iii:i?i:arr rr':
!;+liii l:i i ;i li;iil iiiiil:il:i:gi E;E
i'il*i i;;l ;i t*tiii ;iifiiirii:iir lii ;
irtiiti ;:ii ti iil,,l iliiliiil:iiii iii
=
l;;li:i ltit ii i;#{ iar:4';;i;:i;,.,;l
"i,*:i;i "iiri -;'i',:t".li:l:lti;:iilii';'i
iiliii lii, i ;i*t Hiffiiililrt Ee
fl
4E
lli .tlL cr
t.|-o
ot G,
>f.pl c,
o,.5
oo
onC
:.: o
:l
.ll
aa(
_.6. J
. .d >.C> = r.o9{ro ooO r,t' orl o!:c., L 9>oa(J
ts o ti at
(, lii') r'J.!. =a r o-rJ r.. !
'J :l tr "lc r,. rf J >
J!:. CLl,! 6 rit
tl c,q9 >!::": I rl oJ l/tl I3t:| qlr il -.;Oa'l !.- rr .il c,.i,I = c r,: i'i ,) ra
--l :! l..i H.r =.!t ti.-. I Ut ,.t)l u.i i !i! o(l ir -. v. c.l i:'uL l .a.J3rc-4o no
at'{ iroit tD ::(J!.l
!_- rr r
'.{ i! -.{
lto rt< u ..1.r' -:!rd.- <rl
-i rt C
or: ir I.,E9 9lG6 ar
tr
n
O
Y#
l,'IINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 14, 'l 978
3:00 P.M.
Present:Ed Drager' Chairman
Ron Todd
Gery l'lhite
Dudley Abbott
Pam Garton
Scott Hopman
Sandy Mi 1 'l s '
Diana Toughjl I
OF APPROVED LANDSCAPING PLAN.
Staff Member:
VILLAGE CENTRE - AMENDMENT
The Commjssion opened tl'eir meeting with item number three
on the agenda. Fred Hibberd, along with his attorney is asking the
Commission to approve changes in the plaza landscaping plan as approved
by the Town of Vail as a condition of granting a parking variance.
Mr. Hibberd explained that there has been a tremendous dog prob'l em. The
dog owners are walking their dogs in the area and using the area for a
reit stop. Mr. Hibberd presented his plan for use of natural grasses'
plants and wild flowers in the area; with installation of'a fence that
will match the iron work on the buildings. He a'lso stated that Rika
Elrick, Landscape Architect for the Town of Vail ' had reviewed his
pl ans and felt that they wou'l d match well with the landscaping done by
the Town of Vajl, especial ly around the Transportation Center. It
was brought out that the iron.work fence would be 4 feet in height-
Jack Curtin was in attendance representing the Condominium
Association at Village Centre. The owners are concerned about the
new plan for landscaping in the plaza area reducing the chances of the
completion of the master landscaping plan for the whole area as promised
by Mr. Hibberd.
Diana Toughil'l stated that separate consideration should be made
between the'l andscaping and tree planting and the landscaping in the
plaza area which is tied to the parking variance.
Mr. Hibberd feels the landscaping that has been done is
adequate and that with approval of the change 'in the landscaping for the
plaza area it is then essentially finished.
Mr. Drager asked for a staff recommendat'ion of the interpretation.
D'iana Toughill stated that there are two seperate issues, the Council
approved the plaza landscaping as a condition to the parking variance'
and that should be all that the Planning Commission should deal with at
this time.
Jack Curt'in stated that the owners at Village Centre have
been trying to help with this problem, but that granting approval of the
p'l aza landscaping p1 an would take away their leverage for completionof the overall landscaping plan.
o
Page 2
MINUTES
Planning Commi ssion '14 February 1978
Sandy Mills wondered whether Cormission should table the
plaza landscaping plan at. this time and have the Town Council take up
the entire project.
Dud'ley Abbott felt that the Connnission should give a condit'ional
approval only, to be tied jnto the decision made by the Town Councilfor the entire landscaping project.
Dud'ley Abbott made a Motion to deny amendment of the approved
landscaping plan until such time as a Master Plan be submitted to
the Vail Town Council. Scott Hopman seconded this Mot'ion. it
was then open for discussion.
After discussion a vote
3 voted 'in favor of the
Ed Drager
Scott Hopman
Dud'ley Abbott
4 voted against the Motion for denial:
Sandy Mi 1'ls
Pam Garton
Ron Todd
Gerry l^lh'ite
The Chair asked far another Motion.
Gerry White then made a Motion in two parts: He moved to
approve the amendment of the approved landscaping plan, contingent upon
the Town of Vail agreement with the Master Plan or completed landscapingplan, or change in the p'lan by mutual consent. Seconded by Ron Todd.
There were six votes for approva'l , Dudley Abbott voted against.
The next item on the agenda was:
THE PRI RY - AMENDMENT TO COilDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOI/J SIGN SHOP.
The question posed by the Corm'ission pertained to customers for
he sign shop causing increased traffic in an area that is predominantly
residential . The appl icant replied that most of her customers telephone
her shop, and she goes to their businesses rather than they coming to her.
She does s'i lk screening, painting, and cuts a.n occasional board; but alotof her work is graphics which are done on the customer's premises rather
than in her shop. It was noted that approval was given by the Sandstone 70
residents by letter to Lou Parker, and a copy is held by Diana Toughil l
for the record.
r.:as taken on Motion:
Motion for denial:
*rt
o
Ron Todd moved for approval of amendment to Cond'i tional
Use permit to allow if,. SiSn'sirop in the Printery Building_in accordance
with the memorandum iiiuea-Uy thb Department of Conrnunity Development'
Seiona.J by Dudtey Abbott. ihere was no discussion, the staff has
giu.n ttr"ii recomir"naiiion and the Motion was passed unanimously 'in
favor.
Page 3
II'IINUTES
Planning Corrnission
A set of p'l ans
review, The apPlicant
l4 February 1978
The next item on the agenda:
RESIDENCE - A REr EST FOR A S CK VARIANCE FOR LOT 2'
along with a model were presented.for Commission
asks ior a 3h-foot variance which is caused by
,rrw
tfie fieigfrt of lhe house. The Conrnisiion was in agreenent that to keep trees'
ina io ilinimize cuts-inA "etaining walls, requests for setback variances
of this type are va'lid.
The Motion was made by Gemy White for approval .of the
request foi a Setbacli Variance and djstance between buiidings for
thd Thomas Residence on Lot 2, Block l, vail village l3th'Filjng 'in
accordance with the memorandum as issued by the Department of Cormunity
Development. Seconded by Scott Hopman-
There was no discussion and this Motibn was unanimously approved.
The next item on the agenda:
GORE CREEK FLOOD PLAIN.
t After discussion by the Cornmission, a Motion was made by
Gerry t,lhite to accepi-tne iiudv done bv.Hvdro-Triad.on -the 99i:9I9tkflooi plain dated Jinuary'1978 and amend the comprehensive maps and-
piini, in accordance wit-n the memorandum issued by the Department of
bo*rnltV Development. SecondeO by Pam Garton. The vote was unanjmous
for approval ,
A Motion was made for postponement of the Public Hearing of
al I Zoning Amendmenti as publ j si.red,' to February 28, 197.8. Thi s Motjon
was maOe 6y pam earton-ini ieconded by Scott Hopman and unan'imously approved'
EdDragerthencalledforaMotiontoapprovetheMinutesof December .|3, 1977 with any changes or addit'ions and as written' Sandy
14irii-io-r"ved-and this was ieconaea by Scott Hopman. These Minutes
were approved with Dudley Abbott abstaining.
Dudley Abbott and sandy l'l'ills will attend the Town counci'l meeting'
It was then mentioned that the Flanning Commission may want to meet !9ain
nexi weef, February 21 ,1978, so that i complete list of applicants for the
ri.J"ii". on the Pianning Comnission can be presented to Council.
Meeting adiourned.
MrNUrEs * lnfl:I'rfl orSIN'.3Tt3-$a'. j*rss ro*
MEMBERS PRESENT
Gerry WhiteEd Drager
Dan Corcoran'
Gaynor MillerJohn PerkinsJim Morgan
Roger Tilkemeier
\
COUNCIL PRESENT
none
STAFF PRESENT
Peter PattenJim RubinDick RyanBetsy Rosolack
Dan corcoran moved t,o approve Lhe minutes, second.ed. by Ed Drager,'vote was unanimous.
2.Exterior Modification to the Lioqshead Goldola Build:in
4.Chrj.stiania Loggg_jg$jry_yarjance bo Alllrn, a 2800 $e Ft Additj.on
Jim Rubin presented the project as explained in the memorandum andstated that the staff recommendecl approval. B. J. Britton, ovrner ofA Place on Earth. -showed_drawings and clescribed the -""r-ilir"i-'rrlgt,j'n the winter in front of the rrliraing. ge mentionecl that the two srorefronts \'Jere conceptual. trrat trreie vr'ere no tenants as yet. Discussionfollowed concerning the fact thai the barrier in front of the buildingseparated the building from the marr, a.nd. that it was so wide that itlacked people perspeciive. rt was felt that this mo<iifi-cat-ion rvas needed.for the Lionshead commerciar exposure. Dan corcoran movecl to approve,subject to the conditiotrs noted'in the "iiri-i"port, ra Drager seconded.,the vote was unanimous.
fact that there is no nei.qhbor to the l^,iest because it .i-s an ;rvalanchearea' arrd will never be oceupi-ed, therefo::e won'i :_mpaJt Jy;;;:---
Roger Ti'lkemeier mov'ed to approve this variance, John per:kins seconclecl ,and alr vote<1 for approvat Licept for Jim Morgan isno absLained and EdDrager who voted against.tpprovll becausc he ie.rt no harclship existe.:-..
3. Setback varj-ance to fr-uild a deck on Lot 1 V,li:l.1l a
i*T llli: presented the projecr and, afrer explanarion, srated rhar:::,::::: :::" ::?:l_u::*i b;";;;; ;;-il,;;ilil;i;il.r:";;i":ii.Icrurin.;
:l:.:i::::h:,-::iy1ls:_r:::her, and p"i"l"a-"iit-tr,"i".'iirgti"I='i";;r;j
:::_gl:.1.",.:1':11]::, ro extend'" _ae.l-i";-;"ii; ;";;.;s;:-"iii.iir,Ji,neither of her neighbors objecteci, a*d t.he other owner of her9llt:l_yrote a -retter ..q'-relti'g that rireen be arJ-owed to buil.d onii" "i"ii-,ti5*lIt"in" tr-L^ -^-- -l*:--:".:31 tt]! deck.was not. propo"*a ro.'tir.-u3"x ;;; i;:;; ;;; #;;""i": :r1.,"I3 ""o"iiI iti,'c--L t1, ,
Peter-PaLten presented-trre request expraining tiint it wrs not in ccr.Paul Johns:ton merrtioned tlurt ihete was a past parking agreenrc:nL betwec:mtlie christiania condos. t-he vA, ar-rd chab.eau chiisLiania. Roger Tilkenx::_er-
.;+:./
PEC Minutes - 8/25/80 - page 2 \
said that he wasnE avtare of any ag,reement w th an" christiania condos,but.that the agreement was with t.ha christiania Lodge, vA and the Kendarlresidence. Paul added that only one space has been deeded to one condo.He went on to exprain that the units he wanted to convert were verysmarr and also that 3 units had only showers. The plan was to reduce9 units to 6 larger units, thus impioving the guest rooms, and change2 units_on the giound level to housekeeping quarters and storage. Johnasked' if g rarking variarice was needed.. others did not see the needfor a_parking variance,- expecial.J-y in light of the fact that there maybe a letter verifying the iarking aglreement. peter and Dick felt Lhat,t't may be good to give a parking variance so the appricant, wouLdn'thave to come back again. -otheri felt that since paur wasnrt under atime duress, he did;'t need . ,roru "o*.
-aa-b;;;";-;;"uJ-InJt .*Ji-"ia"r._tion of the variance be'postponed, and Roger T. seconded; The voteto postpone consicleration was unanimous.
p. Vail Associates Conditional Use permiton the Upper Go1een peak Tennis Courts
to placefor the
temporary structure1980-81 ski season.
Peter Pat.ten presented the study and mentioned that it was the samerequest as last year, and the slaff recornmended. approvar. Discussionfolj-owed about th-e.parki"g ut"iis-;";-;;;;-Irr" n""n i1regarly. and rhefact that the parking staits had been there 2 or 3 years. ri,,ir i"ineasaid it was vAts intention to fix-up the bank beyond the parking, andthat-Lhe parking was supposed to be-for rh; ;a;;'personnel-. Requestryas.fgr.one year at a time, until such time as VA will build peimanentfacilities for small world. Tom had a letter from pat Doclson indicartingan ag'reement with the Recreation Dist.rict.
Dick A1lis of Manor vail spoke to say tlrat they were not basically opposec.to the_seructure, nor to Small_ irlorldl but was Soncerned about the amounrof traffic and the speed of some of ihe traffi.c in that.dreo. He arsomentioned the inrpact on his parking. He asked. for a speed bump. cel:rywhite felt that Lhe councii ;;;ie ::eacr tliese minut-es and receive thecomments. Dick felt the neecl for some so::L of tracle-off since he ret:the ski crub use 4 parking sipaces. He fer-t. that it was the only partof vail that has reLained thl cha::acter that va,il s.tarted out to be.
Dan corcoran moved to approve the conclitional use penni.t subject tothe conditions notecl j.n-ltre staff repor:t. IIc Drager secogded, ancL thevote was un;rnimour; r,ribh Roger T. trh:staining.
6.Selback Vari arrr;e !o bu:LJ.d an erdd-itlon onto an ex.i. sLin re,siCenceon Lot 34, Bloc_-l< I Va i. l- I'{e er cl ov,'s S rii:r cl.-i. v i.i-:i oit
Peter Pal-te:li presented the staff findings,; an<1 the staff recornrnendatio;tof de'ia1. Irlark Donar<1son shoivecr photoi of var:i.orr,s sidc:sr sayi'q t.lr.atthe projeci:ed acldition. would impacL the site Lhe leasit. The <lj-scussionthat fol-lowed questioned the reison for puttrng tl're garage in that posit:-o::or in that pJ.ace, and, it was gene::a1ry tert trrrlt tire'-garige cour_d. bemoved a little Lo keep i.t rvitfiin the ietback-.
Ed Drager moved for derrial, seconded. by Roger Tifliemeier, and the votefo:-- dcnial rvas unani-rnous
\
Density Contro qrriance and an Exterior [ificat,ion to constructa2,9Cn s;uare@ and a l,Inq a I,IYU square foot managerrEVillage Center D building, iractapartment addition to the nast oi theBloch 5E, Vail Village fst riiing.
Jim Reuben explained the proposat and Fred Hibberd pointed out thatwhen the building !'/as constructed, alr traffic to the Virlage centerwas supposed to enter through the ramp fr;;-;: Meadow Drive] The rampwas too steep, and so was ri6t used. pioposed ir r o.ru story commercialsPace and a manager,s apartment on seeond" floor.
'fim Reuben was 3sk-ed if the plan conformed to the urban Design pran,and he said that -the urban nlsign Plan dealt with one story but it couldbe stretchecr to deal with .-t;; story. The heiqht was discussed andthe view plane was examined., and. the fact that in 1974 a 22. space parkingvariance was granted in "r"t"r"rrq" for the tanascapecl area which is theproposed site of the new buirding. Hibberd stated trra.E. he found itdifficult to keep the area -w"[Lr"a, and was "orrtinuarly picking trashup'from it, ancf ielt. tha'L it ciia,roi ror]r.--p;;I of this rand wourd bededicated, to an exclusive fr"-f.rr".
cecil Dodson, president of village center Buirdings A,B, ancr c sp:qkg.He felt that trre 2nd story *o"ii-""t off the viJrv cc.ridor for zB, 3u,and 2c, 3c, 4c to the worih siae. He expressed support of tire conceptof pedestrianization, and iir"-i"t story i",run ihough the lst story wourdcut off his own view)- Fre felt itr^t .rrlr,'*"i" i*p"rtanl_ was the impacton the view corridor to trre souirr. IJe i"l.t-it-*is good to elirninarethe entra"rr rt:l^the ramp. s"pport was for the conunerciar- space,not ti:e second. story.
More discussion about the- impact of the 2nd floor folloiverl, r.rith Dj,ckrssuggestion that perhaps chanles be made ;;u;";iar1s, especially inright of the fact thai ttre uiuan Desi-gn plan Jeirs ivith onJ.y o'e story.
if:""3i::ussion folrowed concerning rhe need for emptoyee housins in
Baclc to the plan and the urban Design Pran cal-ling for: onc story ai.clitiorrand one s;mall pecl.estrian park. Gerry felt thaL any, change from LhacPran cal'ed foi redesisnii,s "i trre uinin-;";;;; i,r,rrr.
Ed Drager proposed {:hat thj-s lvas a major change to trre DGpr;rn. Thcrevras no second' Jeff winston hacl writlen corninJnts on the p,lan l-hat r,,,ereread' The fact that it is one or tn" majo.r entr-anc:es t.o t5e- Tcwn a.r:dtherefore siroul-d.rcinai' one stoi-y r,,as pol,nted out by Gcrry. Discussionfo]lowed conce::ning keeping in"-"aait-iln one :;tor:y on tire rr*or:th, a.clL/2 sLorv o' south. - Ji; ry;r;;; Lr:.<sgesteri thar phc:tos be tai<en. FrcdIlibberd sraLecl rhar he didn'i ;,.;l'i;";;r,."*i;,_,; changes t--o tl-re uD. p1ana'd was willing.Lo go to one storl.r;rncl skil> tirc ies;:aen{:ial" p,:rr:t.
Ed Drager: moved tha1, the request be tabled unt,il. sept. Bt secondecl bi,Roger and tl:e vote was u.ra.riorous
Roger moved thaL the J.ast itenr (#Sy conce::njng L,ol-be L.rb1e:d to Sept B, secondecl l:y"Dan Corcoran, \/ote
1.. b1k 3, Lion's liidge#3
w;t s unan j-mou s.
Moved tlrat the meeting bc adjour:nccl , 2nd l:y r UnanlmOUlri.
.r :.!. $2;-,\j!--l r\r+,r:9,a
v ,-:../t \({-)/@:
o^r" 5 -:JO' 8()
Proiect Nam€:
Proiect Descriplion:
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block , Filing
Zonei
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board 6-q-ro
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL
!
,l
iti,Summary:
Chiqt Building Otficial
Daie:
t*r*
Zoning Administrator
Ei
..''
Project Applicatlon , .St
'I Date
,/,1 r ^, \/-7
Project Name:
'i'f ,
tlr 1i ! ,l -,-: t li/ .t , i tProiect Description:
--l-t.
Owner Address and Phone:
Architect Address and Phone:
Legal Description: Lot Block "'-. , Filing
Zone.
Zoning Approved:
Design Review Board
Date
Motion by:
Seconded by:
APPBOVAL DISAPPROVAL
+-
Summary:
Zoning Adminislrator Chief Building Ofticial
f
box 100
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-5613
May 8, 1980
Mark Cadmus
Brandess/Cadmus Real ty
281 Bridge St.Vail, Colorado 81657
l Utinq1afr
department of community development
RE: Outdoor Pati o at Vi I I age --------Center Build'ing D in Frorrf
of Marie Claire and the
Foreign Connection
Dear Mark:
This'letter is to confirm that the Department of Community Deve'lopment
of the Town of Vail endorses a smal'l patio in the location described
above. The specifics of the design of the patio w'i 1l need approval
from the Design Review Board, but primari 1y depend on an acceptable
arrangement between the owner of the space and the proposed tenant.
Two things that the Town would request is that enough space be left
along East Meadow Drjve for the future constructjon of a pedestrian
wa'l kway and that there be an agreement between the three parties
(the Town, the owner and the tenant) that if it is necessary to
redesjgn the patio at the time that the walkway is created' that
necessary revjsions w'i'l 'l be made at the tenant's and the owner's expense-If there is sufficient space left between the patio and the street'
the potential revisions to the pat'io should be mjnor.
If I can be of further assistance, p'lease'let me know.
Si ncerely,
.t if
.2-,-e-t tf lU
James A. Rubin
Zoning Administrator
JR:df
EoF
EF(a
z.
o
z
;r\X
\ tuJIF
I
\v
$
al
$t_,
N15
.Ft t+
-\). o
u-Julo
=E
A
Eo,
-g-o(U
.9
o-
6
3
F
AF
o
oo
o)
!
cl
E
o=ldo
o
o.o.(0
'.g
E
o)
Eo
(!
E
o
.9.c
E
.o
o
o
6
li36
lt .Eot: o'=O('
g8E
E; g
E.= ;Flc6gEc-o'- thc:5:gFd'l =c96'- oG
3.E t
EEA
=:E,-oo
fEo
€EeF!ii=!o-(5 clsEl.9- o5*p:fi6
P E.EOC:
EdE_ag
6 6.=5 a-g
sg;tt r=-9:3i6>9 6a
i* E
.i6 s9E qri;gq)r-ocD
-o(6
U'
UJ
t].Jt!h
=EuJo-J
FoF
vlg
|lt+,an
Lo
I(U+'c
=rElPitdqln
g
3rl.
zo
Fge
8u,i
J
IJ,JzllJ
zzo9ho-9
=B A
.to1>E9l!<oqHFF5-ioi
E.
o-ulE
J
z9Eo
zo
F
ElJI
zl
.. >lo
UJo
|,lJ
UJz
.D
=E
UJc
z
E
Irl
u,F
o
I
IJJFoz
\z,
.n 9F
=k}-al! O --
=5
=
d8
E
lruto.r|-oEE
E<Clf€fre9ELb9EE
=>=ul:-E h=o o-- Ex >di 8s9 \utE Xa!E ;=au1o-:!i
IJJ(DoF
=
=Elrlo-zot-
C):)
E,hv,zoo
!n!
=F*ix(JA;H
l_l
C;ltotJ*l;;l
l;llGtl='fl(Jtz.F-i9E
lzo
F
6o
d,
Ftn
t t'>Fd,O
lJ',@
:Z
ii
=z
IDoI,
-
11,too
.J
-
Io
-l
u.l
=4
c
Eo
()oU'an
3
-\.t'l'l
>lctrll
Iolsr I t')€l(ra+t I sl-El+olLIrLl E.l o--lolot ool (JFrl
a=ul toE=qJ>g5
tl
El -l(l)l tl
et N3t 1;l ?l -Ll ol c\lo. u4 r\-c (rl co
E *l *l3*
FI PI ,-E
tltltltl
lej
lsltJlI?Il>lI tll
del il =l
u-l
I
-rl
=.1ollulcl
JI
<l>l
ll.lolZl ..r
=t :
FI
I
J
=.1ol
:|>l
tJ-lolzl3lolH=tr =E
II
I
I
?lOIl!lGl
JI
?l>l
bl
2l ..t
FI E
t
Eu,z
=o
F
uJEroE
E-rO<Fcc)uj <zEIJJ F6Z
C)
JE<oC)F
fr3fr,2f
90ZF
=<z,E
1Zrro
dx:IFz<)-<
Y><o
tir
=o2 o
<Oan1HE!D
ouJuJt!F
=Etllo-
<turFozoz6J
co
.6
I
I
IluJ
t3
I
I
I
I
I,
tk
IFlv,z
t=
le
IH
rE
I
I
I
I
I
I
t_,
rc)
IEiot('tzro
t!JUJo
lt
F
Fz
C)
o
Gulz3od|!ulatz;xEvIulFI<F4a9zo<
-:- o c6 * E.o,
iEE:E
€E EEt
€9:E.a
:E**f-- O't -rE x E.E't
i€gi€g.; Ee g
sE;sJ
rEig!9ao6d
XEE H!,
:sE;=co'-!-E=0)laC
gsE:;
E Ea=9
iBiig
U'ujt!tL
b
=EuJo-
J
Fo.-
:
IJJ
-e,o36 5bh o- 9=5fzYF d -q.tgcE
9() 12\JZ=rr<3i i:g HrNO
c
o-uJc
z
E ,. >louJ
uJllJzoE
luo.
J
z
E
I
!Dn
ts
=.Elrjcltol|loz
loU'
oFc
Eq
JFUl i-h=
=Eo- ul>o-O|!oo\ u.rxo-:>
l!)
II
uJ.ooF
co
Eeoo
E1t
'E
5
E
Eo(,
ri\ o
I-!'l>FtsE
-CL:o
-!
z
.rPz4dro
=zdP
EF3A;E
t-,Q,
0)
o
v
o2-'---)
i
t
I
J.l
s$
3a9.4
J\49
'^J
Jl!
2o
$g
dt-
$
R
st
ui
=z
@oI
IJJ
=z
c
Fo
.4ulqoo3J
=
n
u
$
Ej
4
fl
E
=ltrl
A{
N,\
s
Ui
t
uJ
=E
$
r$
s
JFtiG
x
C
d
-J
6
3
E
N
$
a
$
=
t!-
oz
dUJGJ
a
t!
z
319lFI tr
oz('
ul
:
3r!oz39Fi
o
o1uJi
t!
zl
319lFI
d2
ciu,lG
J
<l>i
u-lqzl3lqH e
o
7
UJq
<1
t!olzl3l
FI
UJJutF
eulz
=o
F()L!t
G,
c-rO<Fcc)uJ<ZE,llr F(nZ-o
O
JE<o(JF
f;3
-2.l
gF
3Ea'5o
{x:1 F
33gt
=g
oEh
UJ4EFr-o2<c)qHtr!D
Sli'ri';;5i{:,:E
+l
+N
=.fl
-\toN
bo/e rBneertng. rrc
143e nreffiild. surbrrl0
crosroocb shopprE center
loil. colocdo 81657
n3/a76-2170
6oTil ?NtbaY HF+%F
r l4t1?
3dl
,L4'+ ZrZtl+i**ae& I
w4r.of
cr)T
1+ 4rLxf+
Hergg(
t+44 +Jl l,arw$ h^ r,7.t'e'
F VYIOVVL Yt v5?cT15l
.Anb a,il'+
I(H?-*4/ktt ft*6r?e7-
arvfi flq
I
vAtl./ 40.
OF
'26 )erovvq 'e+
ocMe engn€€nrrg. rrc.
1d3 e rneodorv dr. suife n-10
crGsoocb sllosmg cenlef
r,orl. colorodo 81657
fi3/476-2170
+l
+N
-ffr{
toN
N P}Jtft.t Iz
o?7t1t flq
.tlfa t l.O
Yt v 3roq15
a\'+ 4t2t/+
Hvrv?F
rLAN
VcTilorfi
l*A+t
3Jl
t4H+ aJl
F LYIzVVL
Sll#',Sra -a a
lr'fi-l -i
I
ff-lF-)+'t rlt Yy
A6TFEF
1t 71b t:llt+
flFwt+
,L4tq |tQ.xf+
r4h.?9&
vAlf,./ 40.
OF
26 OdlA??lz '/,e
/ s*t 3t
/lz/1 q
OEIE / 1 JOBNAME
READY FOR
LOCATION:
bTION REQUEST
TOWN OF VAIL
^ /'-, -9/- a ' ,
INfJ
BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D,W.V.
tr ROUGH/WATERtr FBAMING
r-r ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING tr GAS PIPING
T] INSULATION
tr SHEETROCK
tr POOL/ H. TUB
NAIL tr
tr
tr
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
d.,rlruar-tr FINAL
'APPROVED tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
oor= /) ' 2 t' /J rNsPEcroR
,N#'oN#;':;
JOB NAME
TOWN OF VAIL
"h 0rlDATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
BU
trl
BI
{r
nl
tr
il,
o
ILDING:PLUMBING:
FOOTINGS / STEEL O UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr BOUGH / WATER
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHE tr GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL / H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
tr
FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MEGHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
o"rw{tr FINAL
Mppaoveo E] DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
,/l! ,' r' .t '.,-DATE INSPECTOR
/ 5-rE
TOWN OF VAIL
1z;DATE JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON WED THUR
CALLER
TUES o -----@PM
INSPECTION REQUEST
READY FOR
LOCATION:(la ( e-'
UILDING:PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
tr ROUGH / WATER
BU
trl
trl
trl
nl
trl
oai
tr
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FOUNDATION / STEEL
FRAMING
ROOF & SHEEB EI GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD NAILING
INSULATION tr POOL/ H. TUB
SHEETROCK NAIL tr
rl
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
tr HEATING
tr ROUGH D EXHAUST HOODS
O CONDUIT
Qz
O SUPPLY AIR
trFtK tr FINAL
tr REINSPECTION BEQUIREDVEDtr DISAPPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
t
I
I fl r Ir';
DATE
READY FOR INSPECTION:
LOCATION:
,,;irir-
-"INSPiCTION REQUESTTOWN OF VAIL
..., I: - |
a.- -t \
i4d/ PM
ttg3
JOB NAME
MON
CALLER
l/, l lU, Z .- t_'e._.-.
BUILDING: PLUMBING:
tr FOOTINGS i STEEL tr UNDERGROUND '
tr FOUNDATTON./ STEEL _ tr ROUGH / D.W.V.
f | 1.d rRnutruc f4't,'! t t \ -- tr RoucH/wATER
AAr]tr ,a. QH trtrT:N ""'' tr GAS PIPING" PLYWOOD NAILING
D INSULATION
-
N POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL E
F] r-l
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL: MEGHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
BUILDING: PLUMBING:
tr FOOTINGS i STEEL tr UNDERGROUND '
tr FOUNDATTON./ STEEL _ tr ROUGH / D.W.V.lL-. . 7 .." .i --FRAMING T''/ : I:A '\ '- tr ROUGH /WATER
n 199.1^&^s-HFFl...^ tr cAS PTPTNG" PLYWOOD NAILING
D INSULATION
-
N POOL / H. TUB
D SHEETROCK NAIL E
F] r-l
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
-
nFl
tr {t^AL tr FINAL
t'g.ePpnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
DATE ,/'/INSPECTOR
T'1-t
INSPECTION
II
o
!-
JOB NAME
t TOWN OF,
, /t trn , 4'
RE
VAI
DATE
READY FOR
LOCATION:
INSPECTION:
CALLER
MoN G'WED THUR FRI AM
BI
tr
tr
D
tr
tr
tr
ILDING:PLUMBING:u
IFOUNDATION / STEEL
D
tr
tr
tr
tr
0
D
tr
UNDERGROUND
ROUGH / D.W.V.
ROUGH / WATER
FOOTINGS / STEEL
FRAMING
HOOF & SHEE GAS PIPINGPLYWOOD Nr
INSULATION
SHEETROCK
POOL / H. TUB
NAIL
FINAL FINAL
ELEGTRICAL:
D TEMP. POWER
MECHANICAL:
D HEATING
tr
tr
tr
ROUGH tr
tr
tr
EXHAUST HOODS
CONDUIT SUPPLY AIR
tr FINAL tr FINAL
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
ETDISAPPROVED ?b'RetruseecloN REQUTRED
DATE ,'',' / -INSPECTOR
v
oz
E
=Gulo-
oo<)
(\Ic.t
ooo
oo
oo
(\!
.t)uJ
I.IJlJ-F
=EtlJIL
-Zqqb\ W ra^
I
I
I
$
{
NN$b
,tN;| | -'{5
I
l_
,Ft<ro
I
I
I
I,r9IE
rFlt2z
t=
le
oItl
zo
=I
dl
.5
z
uox'=E
E8
c, ..2.9o
EEF'5EScL'-o(r(55s'o
=PE>c9'- o,
dE
E6rDc
t-o
F.E.5eI!,=-cLo
do--.c
Eg-6E6OEEC
O6
(6C-c6
-o(!O
ogt,6
d,JE8o(!Sc*(66!>gl)opa
OEr-o
-o
rr:
sf(\J(\l
oItosfr-l
oq
LT'co
oq
o<\!
Oq
O
Oooo
O oeo|<)N
t
oq
ro@N
E
=g.l
z
J
6
I
IIJ
oz
J
J
IcFouJ
tll
zo
=J
J
Iz
UJ
uJqtu-z
Et!
qJ
o
=uJtuJ
z
-rt
uJ
Fv,oo.|Ilo
i
ll,JQ
x
F
uJol
vr.uJulu-d
=EuJo
J
FoF
ozoJ
lo
J
9tFoUJ
uJ
z
=)
9z
IJJ
=
NO|l-Vn']VA
(
:
(
+
l.t 2*;Oai
za
=(
=ic)i
utos?{8..EAtrl
:Q"
f). .$,!o N-'e
zz9oF-V'q5EP Ooo1r,
|!l(oq\c'g'FO.;' (\i
t II
1
I
Il+r
lct1.'-Ll,-t>t -szl'l!.loIIL1.F
'1 (6lo.IOl!lr-*;{+,
trp
2
tr
f,
o
UJo-
F
i'
o-
u,l
J
z
E
z
tr
UJFJ
=UJz
JIlF
=2i ? FSglP
=pH5888?<co()3l|ltlrtrrl
g'?-fl5 3 E?23='tgT=gEo(5orz
z
tr)
az
llJ
?Id.
o(D
t&
F
uJ-
Lo.tJ(d3
.{Jo
o
;i
uJJuJ
o
3
U>
a
uJzx9
F
(l C\I
TJJ
F
J
=<(!x=oJ>=
tu
(DrlF{.{aO
trp
2
lrJJ
z.
c.)
Lr-
t/)
o
L/'')(J
t-lJ)
LL
IJJ)
u-
U)
-F
z.
L!
=oz.
6d.E
>-=
F-{ LJ->r!F{ o<F(J Ld<co
EtrN
zoPz_edro
=zJOa! rt
EE;
;Hg
tr
t
UJo-ILoE9'E'3€s39!t
5EE ;=E FE: :o-J.8b
9 \uiE XO-E ;Taulo-i!E
uro
=g
OOz.*
lltltl.tl{Jl I(nl -il5l :lol olrl Hlel ll
51 5l"l bl
=l
=l-sl Pl
z.l
oluJl
:l
<l>lt!lol
zl3lolFI
tltltltltlI cil| =.1tolI urlt5lIall>lI ll.lloltzlE3lE9llrt Fl
zl
olllll
5l
<l>l
tLlolzl3lIFI
I
I
I
I
cil
=.1olurlil
<l>lttlol
il g
OI rJrFI F
at'
(lJd.
U'o!Fo
!(u+,E(l,(J
o
(g
u;
=z
(D
F
FouJF
T(J
E,
---r O<F(r()tri <zttuF.nZ
2?;()
=#fF-o.6
O
F
(r
Fz.
z
1_oLU
+EFUOz
oz
E
=cIU.L
o
a
il ;
a
cr)
o
o
C'
cl
U'
UJIULL
tr
=r!I
I
I
I
I
--
3
J
zoJ
f,
u,gJFozozoJ
.!
o
=zo
F
oF
F.Iz
=o
(,zz
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lt.Jlljo
i
olt
oFo
.EF2oo
o.c
UJz3odr!lr,oz.;.3aofuJFI<F4aYZo<
-'- q, co ': (6 .Y'
Ebf:E
€; eEg
E 1.E E.U
€tE€$
:irr;EitFe
Eits;
E EE; g
Et;EE
r.; ge to:-ov(g:O!E
sEisI
eiE'g
(' 0'-.: -t; o, o tr
gg€: 5
3 H:Ea*sFei
iE;; g
3EH'€E
ru,r4
$
"\
'[
\
U
\
!
I,
w
\0
fv)
ul
nl
q
ryU
0
o\\
\
a\
t\
an\J
sa
NI
il \
G,/v
6
N
-
tr
=GuJo-oz6J
f(o
YoUJ-
z
J
=f-
rl,J
UJ
z
@
2
ogJ
tuuJ
z
tr
UJ
trl
e.
cl
3t
z
6UJ
t
oo-tuoc?z
ulJo
x
F
]Uo
aul
UJt!
tr
=UJo-J
FoF
z
J
l(D
og,l-C)luJul
z
lJo-
J
,
()
UJ
=
NOrlVnrVA
!\
=3B\r.E\ urt:/o
z
io-E9
ttt O6ba)zrr<oq
g-E
FOjtri
\-il\
l)
lr-]l\\
C/t\\
I
rS\
z9F
)
FlLo
o-
o(r(J
au
\
\\
b
't
q
I
cUJG
J
z
E
z
tr
Etu
J
3uJz
!|lz2e =,F
EEfg<coo3Itl
e-fia3 t rH2 a=d.f<3iEg'*3 35o(,(JIz
z
tr
JfU'z
rul
(
c,\c\
v,
t-
UJ
tl
P
{.)
'J+b+
;;
uJ
A
3
a
tuzY,9
F
\d
\r(
t
S
t\
uJ
F
FibirP
(\J
e)
l-{r{rlcf
e
I
JF
€
v
r)
d,
oz
J
ll-
I
I
I
I
-lJdl
Fo)
il
-'!\,t
q./\-
Aq)
6l
\
:
'li=zt
'q(l
-a, .'i
1:qvq
u{Ez
J
\$
Rdj
v\,><g
\l
=O
at,
t-6o./
=tr
U)
UJ
o
-)a
=
c
=o
't-
!oqJ
J)
q)l
sl
9l
DIn>I
trl
ol
=.)oluJiEl
JI<l>I
EIolzl3lolFI
\\o
\
\r\
ul
frF
.)
rul
:l
<l>l
:lolFI tr
oz
dtu
Cc
J
tl.oz3
a]l-l
oz.
olutlil
<l>l
*l
>l3lolFI
a =d.tr
I
I
I
I
I
I
Icilzl
sl
cElJl<l>l*l
5l sOI urFI F
fi. to
:TR
F()tl,
=.ro
E
-..r O<F(r()uJ<zE
IJIJ F(rzo
C)
JE<o(JF
E3ilF",2b
EC,Oa. t-;()
=sJZr'l- o
<x()F;'C)st
iz
=g
oEhv
Fl-Oz
()
<oqg
dff
6Ei
=tt,Y6E=
RtsN
tr
u.lo.ILoEE2ZE<ctf,60:deB9
ct-o-
F-J,E h=() o.E: >o-:-Ou-E 90I \u.ttx()-r x>P EFqt-!tr
u,clo
gtr
zJgE;
39 .1
:f = qJO(L IL
Eltrtr
ulF
o
EIFaglo-zoF(L
ulY
u,o
oFt
G
uJ(L
IIo
o-oo
I
uJFoz
h
=&lrlo-zoFo
)EFozo()
ad .ln
(sr Fwrrcon
1L-7oo10'4 (h.
-_o , ?)i-??J:Rrn'e'r-
Phone714-1O96 Denver, Colorodo 41t -7 b"lCoo
Dolc
Est.
Ect.
BUILDER
2670 So. Delowore
Julv 14. 1982
No. -J?2-6
p^,FJ,ck - SrgrFl't Ad{usttnc
f,sti.ratc Chucrr 6ath.r
Descripfion Plre FcPaIrf
I r lO r tlor R.S. cedar
flr eoffet
Pclnt neY trln natcrlal at:d flae
F,el'^--lnd*r o! oxterlorr
'.. i.::rove and r<,':lae-., 2il z.:. :',. o: f " :i:r :; : c';;;:':r
lap sldlng oE, veat ex:erlor ( u'cri- pcrlor=cd'on ccttf2|
alproxluatll €0' al,,ovc drlveray. I
eat4r4& Qaaatt tAato @.
Phone7l1-l 096
pg.2-
cont.-
Own er
CONTRACTOR
Denver, Colorodo
BUILDER
2670 So. Delowore
Julv l{, 1982Dolc
Erl.
E rl.
172G5 Locolion
Description
b. F.crovc ard replacs th ern'al glazedl Pella vinCow urrlt.
c. Clean aad scat ge'oked Etucc'o area-
d. Paint 160 sq. ft-. oC stucc€.
e. Sta!.n and o11 ne*' alCing to tlatch exlstlng ae cl.res
as posslble.
f. Palnt new wkiior^' '.mlt.
f nd. Floor corrl.Su\rs {r x 20' , 3t 6' x 9" 4 r x 74} ,
4r x 70r.
a. R{urrvc dryrrall celling and cociar panellng Ln laorth,/
Soutfr corrldor ouigide Lnit f2.
b. Rsrrovs all wall covsrlngs lrr ball, preptle wallc for
c. Clean cedar panellag and ceillngr ln conrplote ccrrldor.
d. 6eal eel.llng wlth plgrentod shellac sealer, apply I
colt of cl.ar flat lacqrrcr on cedar panell,ng.
.. n€placa 80 eg. ft. of 5,/8" dr!'r.'all, tape, flllr flnlshr
t. Rcplaoc 320 rq. ft. of €" Rustlc ctrannel lap ridlng
and 320 ll.neal feet of I x 2 panell,ng trhr stain to
:aatch cxlrttng as cloee as pose lJ:le.
4j. Cf4:n 2I rc'c:r-se. l-jrl:t f i::tu:res, j flr<-ll.J.-s€ ce.:llnctg
( oxclurlc troe:'r) and 2 e):it si,;rs.
h. rephce a O'0' x b,g. s.c., non-rrtec, rer-"y ,l"oru,l
rguEo t end !:r.!a,dare.
@aazn &t44tractc.on @,
BUILDER
2670 So. Delowore
Dorc Julv ll. 1982
47266
Est. For
CONTRACTOR
Denver, ColorodoPhoneT 44 -l 096
trry.3-
cont.-
Owncr
Locotion
Description
1. St tn and lacguer 4 door unl.tr, palnt accon;anlng Jarnbs,
rcfbjsh 4 addltlonal coor ultg, clean, and oll rer...sln
of doorr on thlc level.
J. lnstall 42 rolls of vlnylr grase cloth trallcoverlng
( r:atertal allor*ance per elngl-e roll lr $1{.00.)
k. Cleen and deoCcriz€ cerPetLng.
l. ,.fpl). new ln:rula'.-lon in area where eelllng has been
repIaeeC.
Unlt | 2r
a. F€nov6 all clryr'all ( lesa bath) and rr11 insulatlon.
b. Clcar bath valls and cclllng. -
c. 3611 open franJ-ng andl bath.
d. Faplacr 336 .q. ft. of 6' roof lnaulatlng and 1416 tq.
ol 3l' vall :lnsulatt on.
G. Iilt ll 2424 eq. ft. of 5rl8" drlzrall ( dottblc layer on
plntq, ralbl , tapcr flllr and fin{sh.
l. Roplacc lero clelranco llreplace '.urlt and trlple vall
flr:r through roof etructura r lncludlng fleshlng.
I, Inttall stalrcasg to loft.
h. conEtruct sall for closet under atalrcaae and frarrlng
fa: i.:,:r,id:., i3:'.!::.:tt c:.cse f o.:: 511.-;1ece encicsure.
1. tnatall 728 eq. !t. of R.C. ccdar ructlc cLanne I lap
on velh oitrr'-ry, atalr vall an6 flrcplecelngl
&tu4zn Qoaonzzano @.
BUILDER
2570 So. Delowore
tulv 14. 1982
4?266
For
CONTRACTOR
Denver, ColorodoPhone7l4 -l 096
p9.{-
cont.-
OwncrDotc
Est.
E st'
Locotion
Description
lace kltchen cabtnets
3018 rall
25n x 42' coun
laeo Lath Coor.
lace full louvered closet doors, :Lns
in c:.oset.
r.. Ciern bath fLxtures, har,l$are, r'anltv. and
scratch and r
n. Paint walle and cel
. C]ean and scal gubfloor.
r. lnstall I
a. Provldc end hook I - 30' vent
I - bulft-ln undcr counter diehnarhcr, and I -
rtalnlcr. bar eln*.
t. F€Flaco baso radLatlcn heat ln 1Jv'Lng rconr.
r-. iir,t:ll 42 1'aris of ci:ret .:--:cl ra.j ir f :.;::.:-: --^- . , : -
loft a:ea.
BUILDER
July 1{, 1982
2670 So. Delowqre
No.
Ft
Dotc
Est.
Esl.
47266 Locotion
Descriplion
&r4r4in eht4ot/tactdon @.
PhoneT 44 -t 096
P9.5-
cont.-
Owncr
CONTRACTOR
Denver. Colorodo
Unltf3l
a. F:ash L?118 and ce
b, Seal rralls and cell
c. C1ean, acratch, ljrd ut ce ranic tt le.
d. Cleao bath ll.xturce, nlsceL!.aneous hardware, llght
flxtures' ajrd cablne try.
e. Palnt $.rlls and celll
f. Clean end oll goor urltI cleaD ulrrClov unltg.
. Cl"ean base t€ at urlt.
h. Clean carpet.
l. Clean glate on hearth end entry floor.
J. Cleara and t gtalre and ha:rd,rallg.
Unit | 4r
a. Waah ualta arrdl celllng.
b. ClclD and ol.l door unltr, clean vlndorr unlte, cablnetry
nlscollaneous trr-trs, clcan llght flr€urer, andl bath
c. Seal vall. and ccillng.
d. Palnt rallr and ce
.. Clean and CeoCcrke c:4€t.
f. S::a:C: anC regrout c;ri=lc tlle.
g. C1ean rlat erld vlnyl fLoc!r..
h. clean u.". lt.
I
No.
For
BUILDER
2670 So. Delowore
.tuly llr 1982
47266
Dolc
Est.
Est.
Locot
Description
eotu4tn (aaatnactcan @.
PhoneT 41-l 096
Pg.6-
cont.-
Owner
CONTRACTOR
Denver, Colorodo
t. Palnt strlr str
of Eatarlal s, leroval of Cebrls.
Peralt !ee!, urG tlxea;
subglstanc€, and
IDaurance and Taxes, ( Estbatadl. l
tiotcr Eleetrtcal h&s Dot been egtlsatodl at thla tIBo.
oaoc dcrclItlon hae been perfotmsdl to roof rtructur.
and Unlt 0 2' the rrcrurt ot
r cost of rspalr8 can b. sstlsatedl.
I,i"'*'u,'"31"J'T#:i' -i,lL,:T''"
,,#"tt"REQUEST
VAILTOWN OF
,JOB NAME
INSPECTION:MON
')-1 --
t:\wED q9 FRI
CALLER
TUESREADY FOR
.o"11461,
BUTLQTNG:
tr FOOT]NGS / STEEL
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
tr GAS PIPING
.tr INSULATION POOL / H. TUB
tr CONDUIT
tr
tr
tr
tr
SUPPLY AIB
!
t
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REOUIRED
CORRECTIONS:
t
I
JOB NAME
I ,/ \ TOWN OF VAIL; / .aV t , t:r e., ''.,o, ( r.,*
--. t^. t1 t-.<--
INSPECTION:
CALLER
TUES
2.o)-
MON WQ) IHUR FRr PMAMREADY FOR
LOCATION:
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL
n ROOF & SHEER- PLYWOOD NAILING
-
tr GAS PIPING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL/H.TUB
-
tr HEATING
tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr SUPPLY AIB
tr APPROVED
CORRECTIONS:
EINSPECTION REQUIRED
h 9.Llrr/v!il
IN
('!'!rI, n n --
CTION REOUESTTOWN OF VAIL
CALLER
TUES FRIREADY FOR
LOCATION:
t
1-!.
BUILDING: PLUIIBING:
tr FOOTINGS/STEEL tr UNDERGROUND .
tr FOUNDATION / STEEL tr ROUGH / D.W.V, _
L '.d rnRutt'tc a'J'4 tr RoucH / wATER -
n 199..f-&-si.EFn...^ tr cAs prprNc
-" PLYWOOD NATLTNG ---------
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB -tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
-
tr FfNAL tr FINAL ---
ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP. POWER tr HEATING
tr ROUGH tr EXHAUST HOODS
tr CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AIR
-
tr FINAL tr F]NAL
tr
tr APPROVED
ffi
INSPECTION:
JOB NAME
MON
5
tr DISAPPROVED
WED
O REINSPECTION REOUIRED
I
I
-/>galg k' Zr:- - /?' ;NSpECTOR ra
--ffictoN
TOWN OF VAIL
REOUEST
,t -*,t {1:a!a,tJOB NAME
,'l11
( t/,'3 1i)l*
CALLEB
READY FQR
r-ocnif6i{.":
rues 1-wEi; IHUR FRI ,AM
,BUILDING:
tr FOOTINGS / STEEL
PLUMBING:
tr UNDERGROUND
n l99I-&-sLEFn...- tr cAS prprNc" PLYWOOD NAILING
E FOUNDATION / STEEL tr HOUGH / D.W.V,
tr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATERtr FRAMING tr ROUGH / WATER -
n l99I-&-sLEFn...- tr cAS PrprNG
-" PLYWOOD NAILING
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB -tr SHEETROCK NAIL tr
-
nn-
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER O HEATING
ts nouon tr EXHAUST HooDs
I] CONDUIT tr SUPPLY AtR
-
tr INSULATION
-
tr POOL / H. TUB
tr SHEETROCK NAIL
-
tr
trtr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL:
tr TEMP, POWER O HEATING
tr
tr FINAL tr FINAL
U Rppnoveo
CORRECTIONS:
tr DISAPPROVED tr REINSPECTION REQUIRED
!
\',t,/-/j()
,/.'/JDATE i! .i ,/ { /' 7,v' L tNspEcroH
.i
lssbl 7/j-oc
6 * 6.9)
iHffiE
aEa=lSE; ei
.9? aPE
EEEEEdo'-!-E;OU!C
!,fi: f €;n*E<coo)
tt,a
= i rH23=a-
=<.ElEHEEfi5cJo()tz
sibil8
f9
c,,r{
F{orJ
-E
! (r)
oz
ts
=- u.l@O-ooazoFo-ulY
(\J
@INGIIN
ut/.Q
o
F
=trluo.
t!-o
o-oo
I
u,Foz
EEiB;E
F
fro,t!o
EHE<A]€EEPtl irb9
={E dEIE !fr|: =tlE 8BlE 5rrlE 9;le iii Fltl-'o-irrE
l,u(o
o
Sur.t+coNt,! <
zz99
Xf,EPotDA5da) z.r!<o*
c'gFO;oj
utF
o
z
,rPzerDo
=zd8
F
=ElrJo-zotrC)fEFazo(J
!tD
---
I
I
I
?l
|rIl
1l
<l>l
:lotH
=.1(,l
uJlEI
z3loFI
I
I
Iol
=.1olutl
1l
?l>l
l!lol
=l
s
9l H
oE(u
t,oEEoC)
to+,c,o(J
oo)(o
ii
=z
,ll
-t I
51 3
flfl
=.1(tl
uJl
1t
<l>llrlg
FI
-tIE
oulJ
uJ
E
2P
=-33F--6
(J
z
c)uJ
ol-e. irgX+d.Oz
()
d-rO<F(rC)r,! <zrTIJ F6Zo()
atatE
E
4rn
ul
E
dt
-)zoF(L
lr,l:a
ilJ(n-oF
ts
=E
UJo.
ILo
o.oo
II
UJFoz
"dq
=fif'-r - tt6fi5
Nnn
F
(r
lllo-ll.oEgEAcLf€fra9!k
5EE ;=E FE: >(Li 8sE iHt :>F EF(1, -.('i
l!
@oF
o-zoF()
:)EFaz,o()
/CA/ ... tir=\' itF\78
=
z
ar9zQ.(D0
=zD:lJOaL t!
!trD
a
a,ul.-ozoz6Jl@.l'
ozz
ujF
?
2z
=o
ozz
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tu.lIF
lo
I
I
I
I
I
I
t_,
IO
IFrol(Jt3lo
t=
at
LUuJU-
E
Et!(L
t'|.Juto
lrot!
oF
(lFzoo
Eo
CEutz3od
lL tJ:3Ho?g<FAaYZo<
6*6.e.:u6s?ct
gEE;E
s.e*€t*t P s:
F.=EF3
€ gEEF
iE*;f'- oc -!E s E.E't
iEal c
E;;l€EIfeEaEoEiSEiei
:EEg$
:E€ H?,
:g€s=16o'-:-<;o(/,c
ssit5t o >,'-EP:E.9
gFiEg
F
ut
z
J
UJluILz
tr
ul
Iu
oe.
3lu
EzI
UJ
tnLutlJIL
F
=(r
I.IJ
J
F
l-
0z.ojl
=>&
-Il?3ur,$
=oGl
zz99l-. o- Ixr=c9otnoz>-ooa)zl!<oqHqIEjai
lu
J
z
E
o
z9F
llJFJ
(5z2*
=F-f fl
=nGpH5s32gt()S
64.n3 h?3=d<E=EtSsboo-z
zfz
tr
=
I
II
I
tsz
z
J
UJ-
zIF
JlU)z
oz
ts
=G,utc
|IlF
o
I\
(,z
LL
J(D
F
)
t\^
l€\5
\9
s-d
.t9
'{J>
u;
=z
J
R
aN
Xd
oqr
ulcl
-l
:8
j
=(J =ctr
rqG]ddl
:E
F()
o\)
-{i
r
n..l
9
!.1
S
,Q\J
=Etr
oz
o
UJG
ioz3l
9l
{
J
I
+
$
uIF
Eg
o
UJ
:a
l!ozt9l g.
lol
=.1olul
1la>l
lI-iol
zl3l
9lFI
E
G.
o
E
\
r!ozl
31I tr
oz
gJ
=
t!oz3oF
LrlJrut-
Eutz
=o
IUF
"l_o
-..r O<FE<)uJ<zu.
OZ
o
J(x<o(JF
f;3YF,"' z3
OoZv
>*f:)F!zs-oo
XoYF><)Z<gi
l-Oz
(-)
<(JqH,