The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1968-10-07 Town Council MinutesE COPY COPY Exhibit I Mr. Blake Lynch City Manager Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Dear Blake: September 17, 1968 This is a follow-up to my letter of July 30 to Mayor John Dobson in which I asked that the Town of Vail consider contributing to the advertising efforts. of the Vail Resort Association. Since writing this first letter, a new program -- the $100, 000 Advertising Program -- was developed. And, we hope that the Town of Vail will see fit to contribute to this program in the amount of $10, 000. It is my sincere belief that we will be able to make the summer months as attractive to the traveller as at present the winter months are to the skier. Considering that at this point most establishments still have "give-away" rates in summer, with an effective advertising program we can build a demand that should automatically increase our rates and make them comparable to our "high season"rates. Needless to say, I would assume that the additional revenue pro- duced by this effort would more than pay for the Town's contri- bution in taxes received. If we truly believe that we have a year-round resort area, then we have to have faith in a campaign that would sell our product. I readily admit that in the past we have had limited efforts to sell summer with the expected insignificant results. However, we - at that time - were not really ready for the summer guest. think that this summer's experience with the golf course, the tennis courts and other attractions (all enhanced by the paved . streets) proved that the prime summer months can be just as effective as February and March. Our proposed Advertising Program is mainly supported by members of the VRA. However, we feel very strongly that other entities - especially the Town of Vail - should enter into it. The eco- nomic stability of the Town is dependent upon a profitable year- round tourist operation. The past six years have shown us that the summer is not going to develop by itself and that there is a definite need for extensive promotion to establish this stability necessary for all businesses to survive and to continue to con- tribute in order that the Town of Vail can continue to maintain Mr. Blake Lynch -2- September 17, 19168 istheir high standards of services essential for a resort of this caliber. It has been the VELA Board of Directors' decision to retain the Denver agency of Broyles, Allebaugh and Davis for our summer promotional program. Mr. Arnold Grossman, account executive for Vail Associates, spoke to the general membership at the September generai meeting in an effort to briefly explain how the agency operatos, and for whom, and what could be done for Summer/Vail in terms of pure media advertising. Other accounts of this agency are = Gates Rubber, May D & F, American National Bank, Forward Metro Denver, Denver Olympic Committee, and, most importantly, the State of Colorado's Department of Tourism. Mr. Grossman will present a formal program to the membership at the October general meeting, indicating his choice of media for summer promotion -- e. g. , "New Yorker", "Holiday'", "'Venture", of whichever if not all. . There has been a great deal of enthusiasm among the members with committments totalling between $25, 000 and $30, 000 to date. �J I can only say, in closing, that we -the Board- feel this program to be the most important step taken since the actual founding of the VRA and one, despite the ambitious pricetag, which will prove not only beneficial to the community as a whole but at this time in Vail's continuing growth - absolutely essential. I thank you for your consideration of the above. JS.bsf Very truly yours, VAIL RESORT ASSOCIATION Josef Staufer, President ACTIVITY Account Expenditure Number Cl-ssification 11 Insurance 13 Pension 14 Salary 17 Overtime 215 Uniform -- Miscellaneous TOTAL: EXHIBIT IT SUPPLEMENTARY REQUEST #I EXPLANATION OF BUDGET REQUESTS DEPARTMENT: VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT Proposed Budcret 414 300 q, 500 305 300 500 EXPLANATION In order for the Vail Police Department to reach a milnimurn level of 24 hour per day coverage, one additional, police officer is regaired. The total anticipated cost for an additional man is $9, 319. 00. 0 0 0 EXHIBIT H SUPPLEMENTARY REQUEST #2 EXPLANATION OF BUDGET REQLUESTS ACTlVIT-7: DEPARTMENT: VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT Account Expenditure Proposed Nwmber I Classification Budget EXPLANATION I 323 Radio 400 Used hand radio for C. O. P. 327 Otaer 90 Red Light sirens for C. O. P. personal car. TOTAL: $490 0 0 9 ACTIVITY: FIRE Account Expenditure 'Number Classification Personal Services 15 Salaries Part Titne Sub -Total Commodities 229 Other Commodities Sub -Total C ioital Outlav 311 Fire Fighting Equip?Went i � I EXHIBIT III SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST EXPLANATION OF BUDGET REQUESTS DEPARTMENT: FIRE Proposed Budget 360 360 180 180 700 EXPLANATION $30 per month for live-in Fire Captain who devotes extra time to supervising the men in the Fire House. This salary will give some incentive to perform these additional functions. Red light and siren for Chief and Assistant Chief, s private cars. $50.00 each for sirens; $40.00 each for red lights. $100. 00 - mount rack on Forest Service Pumper for installing deluge gun. This vaould provide more maneuverability of the deluge gun in the event of a major conflagration. $300. 00 - for 6 new langths of 1 1/2 inch double jacket fire hose. This extra hose enables the trucks to be completely reloaded with clean hose immediately after each practice session or fire in which hose was used. $300.00 - miscellaneous equipment including a fan apparatus to be used f between buildings to cool a wall adjacent to a fire ($100. 00). 0 0 EXHIBIT III SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST Page #2 EXPLANATION OF BULLET REgi3ESTS ACTIVITY: FIRE DEPARTMENT: FIRE Account ( Expenditure Proposed j Number Classification Budget j# C apital Outlay C sntinued J -17 Nechaa.ical 75 f Lave; :tower, save time fro_r_ borrowing and returning,,- from another. Equipment 28 Radio Equipment 750 Currently the Chief, Assistant Chief, and two captains have vehicular radios. One of these would be placed in the new Forest Service Pamper when it arrives. It would be desirable to replace this with a mobile walkie-talkie. Sub -Total $1,525 i 'IOTAL:2, aG5 1 j J F AC2�T�'ell P hooOunt " - - Classl • TIM, lea aposed .;` ram for Golf C Qp0 Tree �la�tan�3 �oea on ��' �,a:�r�ra�J tix�a5�s 1, Impro'le i,e a eas by #�3 5nd4 nee, oVe ion aeen5 �,nd tees � net trays for %xs�orr� U' �t-cl g}ox iVP ox r Jro-'a xav,, rt- f�2 ��• 1}000 a d for an- ad�tio � green �°r S�el� iox ra�1qer, i� c�50 elterbo'5e near iax� aid cs � Iti cdgeted tags 5j o Cogs S ��3yr Sa bo s. C`�re �ua�i-y re��aCe ren a tex r;oli Gax �3,d �-ra 1, boo � moo e1eotxio � and s�o base �ixee tie d fog more o4c� ' arc cars. 12 x isase. • • 6 MINUTES OF THE MEETING JOINT BOARD MEETING - THE TOWN OF VAIL HELD OCTOBER 7, 1968 The Meeting of the Members of the Board of Trustees, Vail Water and Sanitation District, Vail Fire Protection District and Vail Metropolitan Recreation District was called to Order by Mayor John A. Dobson in the Lodge at Vail Cafeteria at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL: Roll Call found the following Members present: John Dobson, Mayor C. E. Kindel Peter Seibert Richard Bailey Rodney Slifer T. I. Steinberg Donald Almond Cesare Moretti Lorene Burdick Josef Staufer Joseph Langmaid Absent: John Donovan, Albert G. White, Robert Parker and Francis Brofos Also present were F. Blake Lynch and Peter Cosgriff. MINUTES OF THE MEETING 1. Reschedulina for Liquor License Hearings Mayor Dobson announced the hearings on the liquor license applications, one for a new license for the Lancelot Corporation and the other for re -location of the Gourmet Corner Wine Shop were to be re -scheduled. Blake Lynch reported this due to a legality in publication for notice which was a day late. It was stated an Amended Notice for the Lancelot Hearing would be necessary for publication and posting on the premises; publication would be necessary five days prior to hearing and posting on the premises 15 days prior. Trustee Langmaid made a Motion that the Lancelot public hearing be re -scheduled for October 28 at 1:30 P. M. in the Lodge at Vail Cafeteria, and the Re -location hearing for the Gourmet Corner Wine Shop be re -scheduled for November 12 at 7:30 P. M. (preceding the Town Meeting) in the Lodge at Vail Cafeteria. Trustee Bailey seconded the Motion and it was unanimously approved by the Board. 2. Review of Minutes and Reports Trustee Kindel asked if Chief Holmes had checked the danger spots in the roads as mentioned in the Minutes of September 9, 1968. The Chief reported some of the roads were still being worked on; however, he had reported to Blake Lynch as to where the bumps should be located. The Mayor asked Chief Holmes to report on this at the next meeting. Director Seibert made a Motion to approve the Minutes as read and Trustee Langmaid seconded the motion. All were in favor and the following reports were approved: • PAGE TWO Minutes of August 26, 1968 Minutes of September 9, 1968 Town of Vail General Fund Treasurer's Report for August 31, 1968 Police Pension Fund Treasurer's Report for September 9, 1968 Vouchers Paid for August, 1968 3. Review of Actual Yearly Cost of Government Combined Districts and Town - 1969 Mr. Lynch reviewed and discussed the General Fund Operating Expenses for all the Districts and the Town. Citizen Charles Crowley questioned the cost of the new tennis pro. Mr. Lynch stated he was guaranteed a minimum income and his fee was $1, 050 per year at #350. 00 a month for three months. Following was a lengthy discussion concerning the $6, 700 not yet allocated. It was felt this could possibly be used for a promotional expenditure such as landscaping and Vail entrance sign or the contribution for a promotional project. The Vail Resort Association request for $10, 000 was discussed. Mr. Knox felt this an investment that would increase sales tax revenue in the Town. Mr. Mery Lapin felt there was no objection, but that a limit should be established. He also questioned a decrease in taxes. It was the general feeling that we are fortunate to maintain taxes at their present level, and not wise to decrease them. Citizen Kaemmer felt the Town would want to participate in the Vail Resort Association program as he thought it important we take part in our summer program for promotion. Dr. Steinberg felt some of the property owners might want the program but some do not want to see Vail grow any further. The question is not spending the funds, but where to put the funds? It is necessary to keep the Town at its present high quality. Mr. Knox asked who would do this, and Trustee Kindel stated it would have to be the Town's responsibility. Charles Crowley felt we should improve the product more first and upgrade the Town before spending more on advertising. Ginnie Crowley noted if the Town was going to review VRA advertising costs, then it must also review the $300.00 already spent for Club 20. She stated Vail businessmen are allocating a sum to the VRA program and felt the Town should match this. The Mayor stated it would have been helpful in making this decision if the 50 persons signing the petition to have the Town allocate a portion of its budget for the VRA promotional advertising program, had been there to speak in its behalf. A good many people are still very much interested in some sort of participation from the Town as far as the VRA is concerned. There is a sufficiently gray area so the Board in reaching their decision, will have to discuss this together in order to come to a final judgment. PAGE THREE 4. ORDINANCE NO. 14: AN ORDINANCE LEVYING TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1969, TO DEFRAY THE COSTS OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF VAIL, COLORADO FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1969, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1969. It was necessary that an ordinance be passed for the Budget approval. It was not necessary to allocate every penny at this stage of the game. The Mayor stated the thing to do was to adopt the resolution adopting the budget with the $20, 000.00 in it as a contingency fund and not spelled out. A Poll was taken from the Board on the Resolution Adopting Budget by Blake Lynch as follows: (Richard Bailey read the Resolution). Richard Bailey C. E. Kindel Joseph Langmaid Peter Seibert T. I. Steinberg He then polled the Board as to whether they approved it or not. All did as in the above order. Ordinance No. 14 was read by Trustee Bailey and a poll from the Board by Blake Lynch was as follows: Richard Bailey C. E. Kindel Peter Seibert Joseph Langmaid T. I. Steinberg The Board was polled as to its approval and all were unanimously in favor. The Mayor stated the Ordinance stood as approved. He also stated it would not be necessary for publication to be made. All Members of the Vail::Generlal.Improvement District were polled for the Resolution of the Budget Certification, of the Mill Levy by Blake Lynch as follows: Richard Bailey C. E. Kindel Joseph Langmaid Peter Seibert T. I. Steinberg Polled for approval and all were unanimously in favor. The Mayor stated the Budget stood as approved with the entire sum as represented subject to further revision by the Board. 5. PARKING The Mayor reviewed the correspondence with Vail Associates regarding permit parking lots for this winter. On February 23, the Town received a letter from Donald Almond for Vail Associates on this subject. He read the letter to the Board. George Knox voiced his ;opinion that there should never be a parking meter in Vail to which Stewart Brown agreed. • 0 PAGE FOUR Chief Holmes noted the skier -loading zone worked well last year. Citizen Ginny Crowley noted the parking necessity for guests dining in Vail. Citizen John Kaemmer stated part of the problem was that people did not know where to park - they must be informed. George Knox felt since there are only two entrances to Vail, they could be attended. Trustee Kindel felt this could be done but it would require several attendants. Mayor Dobson stated a committee would be selected to study the parking problem and it would be discussed further at the next meeting. 6. Present TV Situation Citizen George Knox asked Blake Lynch to report on the TV situation. He stated the FCC still had the application and the Cable TV crew was unable to install the micro -wave until this was approved. Community TV had stated they would install this just as soon as they could. They have installed the basic cable system. Mr. Burdick • stated Peter Dominic is aware of the problem and is doing everything possible. As a community service, the Town will take the names of those persons interested in TV and forward them to Community TV when they have an office in Vail. 7. Garbacte Cans There was some discussion as to whether this service is a monopoly in Vail and how the rates should be established. Mayor Dobson asked that the PUC be questioned as to the base rates for this service. Stewart Brown suggested contacting the Town of Minturn as they are setting up their franchise now. The Mayor stated this vo uld be investigated further, 8. Street Liahtinc Proctram John Kaemmer asked if the Town would have their street lights in by Winter. Blake Lynch stated there were still two lights to be installed - one by the Covered Bridge and the other by the Plaza. The electrically run lights are installed waiting Holy Cross hook-up for service. Trustee Bailey suggested a bulb be installed in the outlet on the Bridge at the foot of Bridge Street for the sake of safety. Citizen Heather Slifer suggested a light by the Casino and Plaza buildings. Mayor Dobson stated this would be investigated. With no further business to come before the Board, Trustee Seibert made a Motion to adjourn the meeting. It was seconded by Trustee Bailey and unanimously approved by the Board, at 10:10 P. M. s 0 September 27, 1968 Ron. John A. Dobson Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Dobson: Members of the V. R. A. present at the last Town Meeting were quite unaware that the Board of Trustees would have been more impressed with my presentation had the members further hacked me with vocal support. The Board of Directors of the V. R. A. and an important major- 49 ity of the businessmen of this community strongly believe in the need for the proposed program and believe, just as strongly, that the program should be supported by a substantial contri- bution from the Town of Vail. As explained at the meeting, we feel this joint effort will help bring more guests to Vail, and in turn, generate more funds for the Town. Black -on -white should be more persuasive than just a few voices. Please find here below the list of those who not only will be joining in this additional effort but who also hope the Town of Vail will recognize its validity and support it with its contribution. Sincerely yours, VAIL RESORT ASSOCIATION Josef 31t .ufe; resident I JS:Psf ,j Va C tk Ci ,r:�fCc,r... ?..,[-(..r'"�c:.:i. �..:- ��LG•t'�✓•Gr'e:'%n.. —<e- •�.�4'` } A s (� S-G I I / I I. s ';. N. .2 , p ....-- Colorado Open Space Coordinating Council, - 5850 East Jewell . Denver, Colorado 80222 • Area Code 303, 757 5439 s September 25, 1968 • I k Mr. David S. Nordwall Regional Forester :I U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Denver Federal Center, Bldg. 85 Denver, Colorado 80225 s: Ref: 2320 Dear Mr. Nordwall: i Reference is to your letter of September 6 with the enclosed copy of N, your letter to Congressman Rogers, which was in reply to the letter of August 1. from William Mounsey, Consultant to the Wilderness = s4 E< Workshop of COSC, h We are most appreciative of your personal interest in the relocation of the boundary signs to a site that better defines the Gore Range- #' Eagles Nest Primitive Area boundary. That, and the physical barrier across the trail, will, we are sure, be a great help in i deterring vehicular invasion of the area. We also appreciate the fact that your East Meadow Creek timber sale boundaries were altered in .+. 3 order that they would be no closer than one mile from the present r Primitive Area. However, our proposed addition to the Primitive .a Area extends up to three miles in this area. , s As to the matter of the timber sale, number 26, in East Meadow s Creek of seven million board feet, the Workshop does have several 3, questions. A Your letter for Congressman Rogers states that the sawtimber in the. East Meadow drainage should be harvested to make room for more productive young stands and expresses a concern that the present stand may be damaged by future spruce bark beetle activity. You ry ECO'O.RDtNATION ;= ADERS`r-ii^ i.ESEARCH • ;. Nr P ORMATtON •-EbU'(.�.R1t'1 iN Mr. David S. Nordwall foi Page 2 I 1, •a�= i September 25, 1968 give as your reason fox deciding to continue with the timber sale the need for orderly harvest and use of the timber, ';: The Workshop questions several of these points. First, is the question r, of the necessity of building the road and continuing the timber sale plan f;,.:,,• at this time. The East Meadow drainage is recognized as a de facto wilderness. It is contiguous to the Gore Range -Eagles Nest Primitive Area. The Primitive Area will be considered by Congress within the next few years as an addition to the National Wilderness Preservation System. A citizens' group, the Colorado Open Space Council, made a preliminary recommendation in October, 1967, that the East Meadow`. Drainage be included in the Gore Range -Eagles Nest Wilderness. It would seem that postponing development of this area until Congress P P g P•.:.�.�: could decide whether or not it should be in the Wilderness, an adjust- ment of maybe two years in a plan that covers some 150 years, for m; regrowth of harvested timber, would not be contrary to the concept of orderly harvest. On the other hand, a decision to press on with devel- k,l opment at this time could be interpreted as an attempt by the agency to ' prevent the area from being considered by Congress. So the first •` question boils down to "Why now?" it^Ff Your expressed concern about beetle damage may be part of your reason for deciding to continue with the timber sale. However, in considering the effect of possible beetle damage, the economics of the situation must be studied. Need for use of the East Meadow timber is mentioned. The a Workshop recognizes that there is need for sawtimber in Colorado, but questions the need for the use of the East Meadow timber specifically. The East Meadow sale is for only 7 million board feet. This is a very small part of the potential sawtimber in the White River National Forest, not to mention the state of Colorado. What are the indicators that this specific timber is needed in place of 7 million board feet in some less critical part of the forest? The second question is "Why here? 10 On the surface it would seem wise to dispose of a mature resource that may be threatened by insect infestation. This might be true if there was a need for the resource and if the resource could be sold at a price that � would produce a reasonable income to the nation. That there is no over- whelming need is indicated by the price that the buyer is willing to pay. In the White River National Forest the average rate of return to the Forest Service is $4.49 per thousand board feet. Standing timber is a cheap commodity. The East Meadow sale might produce a gross income 4 to the public that owns the forest of $31, 430. r Mr. ,David S. No roll i Page 3 September 25, 1968 The East Meadow drainage encompasses about 2400 acres of -de facto • wilderness. At the elevation of this timber sale (9, 250 to 10, 000 feet) f the regrowth cycle is from 100 to 200 years, Using an average 150 year figure, the yearly return to the nation for the use of this land for timber production rather than for wilderness would be less than 9� per acre per year. But the public would not realize even this tiny profit. To make the timber accessible, roads must be built. About 2. 5 miles of road have already been constructed leading to the edge of the area; at least two more miles of road must be constructed into the area. At an average cost of $25, 000 per mile for this type of road in this area, the cost of the basic road construction necessary for this sale would come to about $112, 500. This is over 3-1/2 times the timber sale in- come and would indicate a net loss to the nation of over $81, 000. It would cost the ublic 22i` per acre per year to have this timber sold! — r— The third question is "Is it economically feasible? F An alternative to the road building and timber sale is to designate the area as Wilderness through an act of Congress. An immediate result would be to save the taxpayers over $81, 000. A high quality recrea- tion area would be assured the growing population. The summer range of an important elk herd would be protected from vehicular disturbance. Seven million board feet of timber would be cut some- : where else, hopefully at a lower elevation with less than a hundred year regrowth cycle and where it might provide much needed winter range for big game. Access to the future Wilderness Area would j still be possible in this area over the existing 2-1/2 miles of new .' road leading to the base of the East Meadow drainage. The entire Gore Range -Eagles Nest Wilderness would be enhanced for i scientific and educat ional purposes as well as for recreation. In this one place there would be no attempt to "improve .on nature" or to stop time in its tracks by man's management. The slow processes of nature., would continue. Beautiful trees would mature and die and make their contribution to the building of soil and the protection of the watershed, for certainly dead trees (and even trees attacked by bark beetles) have . a definite place in Wilderness Areas. Their death and the beginning of a new forest among their decaying logs is certainly in line with the edu- cational and scientific provisions made possible by the Wilderness Act. The soil and timber would always be there for use if man in some fu- ture time of desperation was forced to cut and till. The final question is "What if we never cut East Meadow Creek?" III k Mr. David S. NoAll Page 4 till September 25, 1968 We are fully aware of and fully support the Multiple Use concept of the National Forests. However, in this' case we` earnestly request 'Zi that you reconsider and at least postpone the proposed timber sale in East Meadow Creek. Sincerely, Edward Connors Chairman, Wilderness Workshop of COSC cc: Senator Peter Dominick . .. .... �, Congressman Byron Rogers Secretary of Agriculture Orville Freeman James Folkestad, Supervisor, White River National Forest Bruce Batting, Chairman, Vail Wilderness Workshop J. William B. Mounsey, Wilderness Consultant • • 0 0 September 23, 1968 Mr. Blake Lynch City Manager Town of Vail Vail, Colorado Dear Blake; Vail Associates, Inc. would like to request that the city assume the responsibility for the permit parking. Permit parking would cover the following; 1. The lot across from the bank and bordered on the east by Gasthof Gramshammer. 2. The lot located between the Wedel Inn and the Night Latch. It is my.understanding that the city will consider the installation of parking meters on this lot, as per conversation with trustee, Peter Seibert. 3. The lot located across from the Christiania. 4. The lot adjacent to the tennis courts and the Golden Gate I -louse. Vail Associates, Inc. would like to request that these lots be handled as in the past, with the city selling the permits, policing the lots, and providing snow plow services. All revenue from the permit sales will be retained by the Town. Al Bridges has requested for Vail Associates, Inc., ten permits for the bank lot and ten for the Christiania. If you have any questions, please contact me. Yours truly, Don Almond Mountain Manager DA:mk TELEPHONE.. 476-5601 i September 28, 1938 { Mr, DDnald Almond Vail .associates, Inc. _....- Vail, Colorado 81357 \ ; Dear Don: I havo the following questions on the",�T it .44dciatc:r proposal to ha,vs Tow n own operate contain parkin<j lots 16r th; winter. 1. Does Vail Associdtes ex:pet that y are,. between F?epi's and Man: ied's will b� used for pr rlangl ir. so, what porti 4 and will tHgre be an J<oy llin back of Pepi's and t6,Covered tldge Stor 2 2. I don't-beiidve the'frustees have made a :recision to i tall parks g meters in the lot east of. the Wedel r Cn i Does V � ssociates plan to dedicate this area to' e Town? 3. Does VarYssociates wish to obtain its 20 permits free of charge,? Sincerely, 3 s: F. Blake Lynch Town Manager ;: r FBL:bd 'a. j CJ September 30, 1968 Mr. F. Blake Lynch Town Manager Town of Vail P.O. Box 361 Vail, Colorado Dear Mr. Lynch: The following is in answer to your letter of September 28th, Subject, Parking Lots: Item #1: The area between Pepi's and Manfred's will not be used for parking. There will be a service road in this vicinity, however. . Peter Seibert will brief you at a later date regarding the service road. Item #2: Vail Associates, Inc. does plan to dedicate the area east of the Wedel Inn to the Town. Item #3: Vail Associates, Inc. does not expect any charge for the twenty permits. The charge will be offset by allowing the city all the lot revenue. 4 Yours truly, VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. Don Almond Mountain Manager DA:mk i TELEPHONE: 476-5601 - A,igust, 1968 VOUCHERS PAID VCUCHER MC. WARRANT NO. CHECK NO. PAYEE DESCRIPTION TOTAL 000288 1479 1592 St. Louis Union Trust & Rexford Caruthers Easement $ 10.00 000289 1480 1583 Petty Cash Miscellaneous 50.00 000290 1481 1585 Colorado Hospital Service Insurance 352,00 000291 000292 1485 1486 1590 Francis Brofos Police Magistrate 200.00 1591 Joe Alperts' Uniforms 126.95 000Z94 1487 1592 Am. Water Works Association Subscription 15.00 000295 1488 1593 Dan Atkins Equipment Repair 50.54 000298 1489 1594 Barteides Seed Company Seed 67.49 0100299 1490 1595 Burton Manufacturing Company Club House Inventory 15.00 000300 VOID 000301 1492 1597 M. E. Cannif Reoroduction 1.60 0.0.03.0.2 1493 1598 Credit Bureau of Greater Denver Service 2.00 .000305 1494 1599 Peter Cosgriff Services 722.08 ON306 1495 1600 W. S. Darley & Company Magnetic Latent Print Kit 52. 85 000308 1496 1601 A. B. Dick Office Supplies 12.90 000311 VOID 000312 1497 1602 Farmers Brothers Company Office Supplies 8.20 0,00315 1498 1603 Gas Facilities Service 27.23 00,0318 1499 1604 Homelite Equipment Repair 58.00 000321 1500 1605 Holy Cross Electric Service 905.34 000323 1501 1606 Dana Kepner Company Bends, Gaskets & Tees 314.02 -0003Z4 1502 1607 Lease Finance, Incorporated Machine Rental 14.18 000325 1503 1608 La Pinata Planning Board Meeting 18.80 000326 1483 1587 Donald G. Lies Building Inspector 66.00 0003Z7 VOID 000328 1504 1609 Montgomery Ward & Company Pump & Pulley 36.77 0003Z9 1505 1610 Mountain States Telephone Service 448.60 000333 1506 1611 Pitney Bowes, Incorporated Office Supplies 53.56 000334 1507 1612 Red Lion Inn Meeting 14.80 VOUCHER .NO. WARRANT NO. CHECK NO. PAYEE DESCRIPTION 000335 1508 1613 Schloss & Shubart Rake Assembly 0.00336 1509 1614 Rio Grande Motor Way Service 000337 1510 1615 Valley View Hospital Blood Tests 000339 1511 1616 Dick Butterworth Expenses Tennis Tournament 000340 1512 1617 U. S. Leasing Machine Rental 000341 1513 1618 Colorado Badge & Trophy Tennis Trophies 000342 1514 1619 Vail Associates Insecticides 000343 1515 1620 Vail Village Conoco Service 000344 1516 1621 Vail Enco Service 00.0347 1518 1623 Weibel's Janitorial Service 000345 1517 1622 Vail Water & Sanitation Service 000348 1519 1624 Western Slope Linen Service 00:0349 1523 1628 Western States Machinery Machine Rental -0.00350 1520 1625 Dick Wheeler Parts 000352 1521 1626 Super Foods Distilled Water 000353 1522 1627 Universal Tractor Company Equipment Parts 000354 1528 1336 Payroll Account 8-1 - 8-15 000356 1484 1588 Richard E. Peterson Landscaping 000357 1524 1584 Payroll 8-16 - 8-31 0 0 0 TOTAL $ 210.52 9.46 30.00 50.00 31.75 48.00 41.40 47.43 28.35 120.00 85.01 57.70 391.38 4.63 3.40 21.34 7,841.34 132.00 8, 119. 19 $20,917.01 • • • 19 POLICE PENSION FUND TREASURER'S REPORT September 9, 1968 Financial Statement Funds Deposited Bank of Vail 1968 $4,828.87 Interest Earned 1968 34.63 Total Amount in Account $4,863.50 Funds Accumulated for duly and August, 1968; To be deposited with September Funds at end of Third Quarter 497.20 'dotal To Date $5,360.70 Respectfully submitted, F. Blake Lynch Secretary -Treasurer 0 • TOWN O'P,VAIL GENERAL FUND TREASURER'S REPORT August 31, 1968 Financial Statement Balance in Bank of Vail Regular Account as of 7/31/68 ($13,076.98) Receipts during August Bond Deposits $ --- Sales and General Occupation Taxes 6,201.21 Utility Occupation Tax --- Parking Fees --- Liquor License Fees - State 276.25 Liquor License Fees - Town 348.75 Court Fines 8 Fees 195.00 Building Inspection Fees 246.50 Street Repair Fees Highway Users Tax 125.78 Management Fees 23,000.00 Accounts Receivable 6,079.40 Miscellaneous Revenue 153.50 36,626.39 $23,549.41 Disbursements during August Board of Trustees $ 736.88 Police Magistrate 204.00 Administration 246.55 Planning 22.80 Police Department 480.92 Street Maintenance 571.59 Building Inspection 70.90 Parking Lots - Street Lighting 60.83 Parks and Grounds Maintenance 194.20 Fire Protection District 181.96 Recreation District 524.97 Water District 741.34 Sanitation District 887.55 Liability Accounts --- Payroll Accounts 15,960.53 Reimbursable Expenses 32.00 20,917.01 Balance in Bank of Vail Regular Account as of 8/31/68 $ 2,632.40 Respectfully submitted, is F. Blake Lynch Secretary -Treasurer r� VAIL, COLORADO ACTUAL YEARLY COST OF GOVERNMENT COMBINED DISTRICTS AND TOWN 1969 (Excludes initial bond fund expenditures which are amortized over a period of years through debt service. e.g., golf course construction funds) General Fund Expenditures395, 070 Non -Management Fee Expenditures: Water and Sanitation District $17,132 Recreation District 7,500 Fire District 4, 750 29,372 Debt Service Water and Sanitation District 130, 288 Recreation District 31,813 Fire District 14,388 General Improvement District 11,11? $187, 600 Bond Reserve Fund Payments 12,300 TOTAL: $624. 342 VAIL, COLORADO 1969 PROPOSED MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT MILL LEVY 1968 1 1969 Entity Mill Levv Mill Levv Town of Vail 0 5 Vail Water and Sanitation District 14 9 Vail Recreation District 4 4 Vail Fire protection District 6 6 Vail General Improvement District 2 . 2 26 26 TOWN OF VAIL 1969 GENERAL FUND REVENUE General Property tax (5 Mills) $25, 000 Sales Tax (20-Yo across the board increase 194,000 over revised 1968 estimate) Utility Occupation Tax (20% increase, 9,500 plus $1, 000 for T. V. franchise) Parking Fees (non -structured) 250 Liquor Fees ($300 fees plus $50 per License) 1,600 Court Fines and Fees 2,500` Building Inspection Fwes 3,500 Street Repair Fees 1, 000 Highway User's Tax Rebate 21000 Federal 701 Grant 10,000 Water and Sanitation Management Fee 99,290 Uncl. $21, 890 for administration) Fire Management Fee 13,.680 (Intl. $2, 750 administration) Recreation Management Fee 52,750 (Represents $21, 030 deficit from $73, 780 in Management Fee expense, Incl. $8, 250 for administration). TOTAL: 39� 5 070 s - �. _ ._.._ ?:,. _. . .. ... ._ ..__..., .,.._, k_ ...,,�-.ati a. _,_.,,a..�....,..i,...a.. ,.r��._.. tr ,Ys..tt >�. rr . •,,:�_ � .,.. _-...., a3as, .2 ..,. ._, .,,,. t ..... I TOWN OF VAIL 1969 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES General Government Board of Trustees $15, 750 Police Magistrate 2,100 Administration and Finance 54,725 Planning 20,390 $92,965 Police Fib, 843 Public Works Street Maintenance 34,050 Building Inspection 5, 530 Street Lighting 3, 500 Parks and Grounds Maintenance 1,500 45,660 Public Utilities Water 34, 950 Sewer 42.450 77,400 Recreation Golf Course 48, 4,030 Tennis 4,550 Pro Shop 12.500 65, 530 Fire 10,930 Capital Expenditures P,.rchase of Gravel 4,000 Contribution to Working Capital 7.000 11,000 Fund ConWictencv 2.822 TOTAL. $375. 070 6 VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT 1969 REVENUE ESTIMATE General Property Tax (9 Mills) $ 45,000 Sales to General Customers 143, O00 Tap Fees 46,000 Connection Charges 4,000 Interest Earned 500 Reimbursements 500 'Miscellaneous Income 1,000 Unexpended Balance (Prior Years) 20.000 TOTAL: $259.000 VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT 1969 PROPOSED BUDGET Personal Services: Board of Directors 1.500 1, 600 Contractual Services: Auditing and Accounting 1, 500 Legal Services 31000 Legal Notices and Advertising 500 Other 500 5,500 Capital Outlay: 1,000 Debt Service: Principal 41, 000' Interest 89,288 130,288 Bond Rcserve Fund 12,300 Management Fee Payment 99, 290 Contingency 9,122 TOTAL: $259.000 .J i • VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT i1989 ESTIMATED REVENUE Debt Retire - Operating anent Fund Fund Total General Property Taxes (4 Mills) 20,000 $20, 000 Golf Revenue: 40,250 Memberships (based on 451 increase, 5,000 part number and part price). Daily Fees (based on 20% increase) 34,000 - • Electric Car and Cart Rental 8,500 Hand Cart and Car Rentals 11000 Tennis Revenue: 3,500 Memberships (based on $2, 50025% 2,500 increase, including price and nuinber) .Daily Fees 500 Tournament Fees 250 Rental of Equipment 1, 813 11813 Sale of Merchandise 8,500 3,500 Bond Fund Transfer 10,000 TOTALS: 30 250 $31, 813 $92,063 DISTRICT VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION 1969 PROPOSED BUDGET Personal Services: Board of Directors 1,500 1.500 Contractual Services: Auditing and. ,xounting 1,300 Legal Services 3,000 Other Professioaal Fees 500 Legal Notices an6 Advertising 100 Other 100 6,000 Capital Outlay. 1,000 Debt Service: Principal 10,000 Interest 21.813 31,813 Management Fee Payments 52,760 TOTAL: $92, 063 ! i VAIL FIRE PROTECTION. DISTRICT 1969 Estimated Revenue General Property Taxes (S Mills) $30,000 Fire Protection Agreements 1,000 Other 818 Unexpended Balance - Prior Fears 1,000 $32.818 1969 Proposed Budctet Personal Services: Board of Directors $ 1.1500 1,500 Contractual Services: Auditing and Accounting 750 Legal Services 1, 000 Legal Notices and Advertising 250 Other 300 2,500 Capital Outlay: Motor Vehicles 750 750 Debt Service: Principal .10, 000 11 • 0 L RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1969, AND ENDING ON THE LAST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1969, ESTIMATING THE AMOUNT OF MONEY NECESSARY TO BE RAISED BY TAX LEVY BASED ON THE SAID BUDGET SO ADOPTED; ESTIMATING THE iE AMOUNT OF MONEY TO BE DERIVED FROM OTHER REVENUE SOURCES; AND SETTING FORTH THE TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES FOR EACH FUND, �t I# { WHEREAS, the Town Clerk designated to prepare the annual budget for Vail, Colorado, for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 1969, and ending December 31, 1969, has prepared said budget and 'submitted it to the Board of Trustees, and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees held a public hearing on 3said budget on October 1968, kl AND, WHEREAS, the assessed valuation of taxable property for the year 1968 in the Town of Vail, Colorado, as returned by the County Assessor of Eagle County, Colorado, is the sum of $5,171,175.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1: That the estimated revenue for the various 11funds of the Town of Vail, Colorado is: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference �I incorporated herein. Section 2: That the estimated expenditures for each fund of the Town of Vail, Colorado are as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3: That the budget for the Town of Vail, Colo- rado, for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 1969, and ending December 31, 1969, as heretofore submitted to the Board of Trustee3 by the Town Clerk, and as changed and amended bysaid Board of Trustees be, and the same hereby is adopted and approved as the budget for the Town of Vail, Colorado, for said fiscal year. Section 4: That the budget herein approved and adopted p shall be signed by the Mayor and the Town Clerk, and made a part of the public records of the Town. READ AND ADOPTED this day of October, 1968. ATTEST: i t� Town Clerk I� TOWN OF VAIL By Mayor TOWN OF VAIL 1969 GENERAL FUND REVENUE General Property Tax (5 Mills) $25, 000 Sales Tax(20% across the board increase 174,000 over revised 1968 estimate) Utility Occupation Tax (207o increase, 9,500 plus $1, 000 for T. V. franchise) Parking Fees (non -structured) 250 Liquor Fees ($300 fees plus $50 per License) 1,600 Court Fines and Fees 2,500 Building Inspection Faes 3,600 Street Repair Fees 1, 000 Highway User's Tax Rebate 2,000 Federal 701 Grant 10, 000 Water and Sanitation -Management Fee 99,290 (incl. $21, 890 for administration) Fire Management Fee 13,680 Uncl. $2, 750 administration) Recreation Management Fee 52,750 . (Represents $21, 030 deficit from $73, 780 in. Management Fee expense, incl. $8, 250 for administration). TOTAL: �395.070 TOWN OF VAIL 1969 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES General Government Board of Trustees $15, '750 Police Magistrate 2,100 Administration and Finance 54,725 Planning 20,390 $92,965 Police 68,843 Public Works ,Street Maintenance 34,050 Building Inspection 5,530 Street Lighting 3,600 Parks and Grounds Maintenance 1,500 45,580 Public Utilities water 34, 950 Sewer . 42, 450 77)400. Recreation Golf Course 48,400 Tennis 4,550 Pro Shop 12.500 65,530 Fire 10,930 Capital Expenditures P�xchase of Gravel 4, 000 Contribution to Working Capital 7,000 11,000 Fund Contincaenev 2,822 v TOTAL: $375, 070 VAIL, COLORADO 1969 PROPOSED MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT MILL LEVY 1968 1969 Entitv Mill Lew Mill Lew Town. of Vail 0 5 Vail Water and Sanitation District 14 9 Vail Recreation District 4 4 Vail Fire Protection District 6 6 Vail General Improvement District 2 2 26 26 0 • I R E S O L U T I O N E; BUDGET - CERTIFICATION OF MILL LEVY I 9TA�E IOF COLORADO ) ss ;I COUNTY OF EAGLE, ) The undersigned, Chairman and Secretary of Vail General Improvement District, do hereby certify that a meeting of the Board of Directors was held on October —Z-, 1968, And the following Resolution was adopted by a majority of 5 At least four Directors, constituting a quorum, were present at the j meeting. f'. BE IT RESOLVED, That, whereas the assessed valuation of taxable property located within the corporate limits of the Vail i' General Improvement District for the year 1968, as certified to by the Assessor, Eagle County, Colorado, is $5,147,215.00; THEREFORE, the Chairman and Secretary of Vail General Improvement District are hereby authorized to certify to the jBoard of County Commissioners, Eagle County, Colorado, the following aggregate amounts which the Board deems necessary to j� raise from the taxable property of said District to finance the I expenditures of operation, maintenance and improvements of the Vail General Improvement District; See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors of is Vail General Improvement District do and hereby does adopt as its budget for the year commencing January 1, 1969, to and j including December 31, 1969, Exhibit "A"; II � 1: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors of the Vail General Improvement District do and it hereby does levy upon all property, real, personal and mixed, within the corporate limits of the said Vail General Improvement District, for valuation purposes as herein described, a mill levy of -21 mills. The mill levy from the preceding year was mills. i Dated: October 1968. i VAIL GENERAL IMPROVEME DISTRICT By�-r. (� G�— ATTEST: Chairman Secretary �I r II i !j 1969 BUDGET VAIL GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ANTICIPATEDR EVENUE Property Taxes (2 Mills) $10, 000 Unexpended Balance - Prior Years 2,249 TOTAL: $12, 249 • ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES Debt Service: Principal 3, 000 Interest 9,249 $12.249 TOTAL:. $12, 249 • t � . I NOTICE AS TO PROPOSED BUDGET , I -'OR THE VAIL WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT, VAIL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT AND THE; TOWN OF VAIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a proposed budge't;has been submitted to the Board of Directors of the Vail Water & Sani�atiozi District, a'. xr Vail Fine Protection District and the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District as well as the Board of Trustees of the Town of Vail for the ensuing year of 1969, That a copy of such propose&budget has been filed in the Office of: the Town Clerk where same is open for public inspection. That such proposed budget will be considered at a Special Meeting of. the s Board of Directors for the above mentioned. Districts as well as the .Board ' of "Trustees for the Town of Vail to be held at the Lodge at Vail Cafeteria on. October 7, 1968, at 7: 30 p, m. Any taxpayer within such Town of Vail may at any time prior to the final. adoption of the budget file or register. his objections thereto,' q`d By /s/ F. Blake Lynch Secretary i 0 0 NOTICE AS TO PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE VAIL WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT, VAIL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT AND THE TOWN OF VAIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a proposed budget has been . )I - submitted. to the Board. of Directors of the Vail Water & Sanitation District, Vail Fire Protection District and the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District as well as the Board of Trustees of the Town of Vail for the ensuing year of 1969. That a copy of such proposed budget has been filed. in the Office of the Town Clerk where same is open for public inspection. That such proposed budget will be considered at a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors for the above mentioned Districts as well as the Board of Trustees for the Town of Vail to be held at the Lodge at Vail Cafeteria on October 7, 1968, immediately following the Liquor Licence Hearings which will be held in the same location beginning at 7:30 p. m. Any taxpayer within such Town of Vail may at any time pr ior to the final adoption of the budget file or register his objections thereto. 14 TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND DIRECTORS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL THIS IS TO ADVISE the Liquor License Hearings scheduled for 7:30 P. M. October 7, 1968, have been cancelled. The Special Meeting for the 1969 Proposed. Budget will therefore begin promptly at 7:30 P. M. , Monday, October 7, in the Lodge at Vail Cafeteria. 00 There will be an earlier Meeting the same day at 2:00 P. M. to be held in the Mill Creek Court offices in order to discuss the Budget prior to the Special Meeting. BY Is/ F. Blake Lynch Town Manager �� /