HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-02-06 Town Council MinutesAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
FEBRUARY 6, 1973
1. Second reading of Ordinance No. 1; AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE
DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY, THE SAME BEING LOCATED
WITHIN VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH FILING, WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL.
2. Second reading of Ordinance No. 2; AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR
THE REVIEW OF ALL APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS FOR
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL.
3. Presentation by Robert Royston regarding the Town of Vail Master Rlan.
4. Appointment of a member to the vacancy on the Sign Review Board.
5. Discussion regarding unauthorized parking on private property.
6. Consideration of minutes of meeting of January 16, 1973.
Convene as the Vail, Colorado, Municipal Building Authority.
1. Election of Officers.
Convene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
1 . Hearing on application of Henschel Lyon, Ltd. for a retail liquor store
license.
0
M
Box 95 Vail, Colorado 81657
January 26,- 1973
. Town Council
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81657
Gentlemen:
We have carefully reviewed the draft of Ordinance No. 2, Series of
1973, which was presented at the regular meeting of the Town Council
on January 16, 1973.
It appears to us that the Ordinance as presently drafted is not
computable with the economic realities of building design and construc-
tion. As we read the Ordinance final working drawings are required to
be submitted prior to receipt of initial architectural approval. Since
even minor. changes in building location, height, size and configuration
resulting from architectural review can require significant revisions
of working drawings, it appears more practical that plot plans, floor
plans and elevations be furnished to the Council for their use in
determining whether to give approval concerning height and size,
•architectural design, set-backs,landscaping, compatibility, environ-
mental effects, utility demands, lighting, parking and traffic.
It is not unusual for working drawings for even moderately -priced com-
mercial building to cost in excess of $50,.00.0.. Slight modifications
in height, other dimensions or exterior materials can easily result in
the necessity for completely new engineering and redesigning of working
drawings to the extent that as much as 50 .to 60%of the working draw
ings work previously done would be completely wasted.
40
In view of the short building season in Vail, the imposition of an
additional 30 days period for the architectural review by the Town
Council also is incompatible with the practical realities of construc-
tion.
For the foregoing reasons we strongly urge that Ordinance No. 2 of
Series of 1973 not be adopted on February 6, 1973, in its present form
and that it be rewritten to provide for review by the Town Council of
preliminary plans and outline specifications from which working draw-
ings are reasonably derivable, (not working drawings), and that the
present time period from the filing of the working drawing to issuance
of a building permit not be enlarged.
JVA:bj.s
cc: M. V. Beckstrand
Ralph Frizzell
Charles Gersbach
ur,% very truly,
n1\
V . AYcS� to
7
•
0
LEAVELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
A SUBSIDIARY OF RIO GRANDE INDUSTRIES, INC.
RALPH FRIZZELL
VICE PREJ14 w-'NT
Mr. John A. Dobson, Mayor
The Town of Vail
Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1973
Dear Mayor Dobson:
ONE PARK CENTRAL, SUITE 1250
1 5 1 5 A R A RA t i 0 E S T R E E T
DENVER, COLORADO 430202
P, O. BOX 5472
4e2 (Z I P e 0 2 1 7)
T E L E P H O N E 3 0 3/ 5 7 3- 6 6 7 e
January 23, 1973
Our Company fully supports the intent behind Ordinance No. 2, to set up an Architectural
Control Commission. Only in this manner will there be logic to the future development of
the Town of Vail. While the Ordinance's intent is commendable, it does appear that the
mechanics of the Ordinance, specifically requiring working drawings as a precendent to
approval, could, as well as the extension of the time periods, work a hardship on develo-
pers. As an alternative might we suggest that in lieu of the working drawings there be
submitted "outline spec ifications11along with other evidentnry material requested by the
Ordinance. To require working drawings before approval is given could be quite costly
in both terms of time and money in the event changes were required. To reiterate, other
than for the substitution of outline specifications For working drawings and leaving the
time periods as presently set forth, we would strongly recommend adoption of the proposed
Ordinance.
RF/cn
cc: John Amato
Charles Gersbach
Very truly yours,
Ralph Frizzel
A�'�J f♦kN �1R 6Wi�
•
•
0
31 January 1973
box 1 1 4 8 o v a i I, c o 1 o r 7 d o 8 1,6 5 7 c 3 0 3- 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
COMPARATIVE FIGURES
What the state library requires of public library to
be considered "a library in good standing".
op pulati�on hours open per week
0-2500 15 hours
25,00•-50,000 50-60 hours
Hours Open Per Week
Vail 53
Frisco 20
Aspen 60
Number of Employees
Vail 1 Full -Time Librarian
1 half-time assistant
Frisco 1 Full-time Librarian
1 half-time assistant
Aspen 1 Full-time Librarian
4 full-time assistants
1 Half-time assistant
Circulation for each library on.1/30/73
Vail
125
Frisco
75
Aspen
225
Book Budget
for 1973
Vail
3,000
Frisco
5,000
Aspen
6,0o0
H
I
•
0
box 1148 o vail, colorado 81657 s 303.476-5613
Regular circulation
Paperback section
Books in the library
Library card holders
Average Books Per Week
Circulated
Average Books Per Day
Circulated
Circulation Figures
NOV 1 DEC 31 J'AN 30
9,816 11, +52 12,633
5,000 6,000 6,200
9,000 10,000 10,500
685 795 913
.316 425 418.5
63 73 68
.
box t o o . v a i I, c o f o r a do 8 1 6 5 7 . 3 0 3. 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
TO. Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager
FROM: Bob Manzanares, Administrative Assistant
RE: Trash Franchise
DATE: February 5, 1973
Mery Lapin, from Eagle County Trash removal, has
approached the Town on the possibility of the Town granting his
business a franchise. That franchise would give him the exclu-
sive right to the trash business in the Town of Vail for a period
of years.
Lapin's objective in pursuing a franchise is mainly
for financial reasons. He explains that the trash quantity within
the Town and the County is increasing, thereby necessitating the
need for him to expand his business.
Financially, the Eagle County Trash Removal Co, has a
few alternatives. The Ford Motor Company has indicated it will
grant them a loan at an interest rate of 15%. If the Company
is forced to take this alternative, there is a strong possibility
that they may have to raise their present rates.
Their second alternative is going with a bank loan.
Rational Bank of Denver is willing to grant a loan at an interest
rate of 9%, if the Company is able to obtain a franchise from
the Town. This alternative would allow the Trash Co. to expand
their business without having to raise their rates.
From the Town's point of view, there are both advan-
tages and disadvantages.
TO: Terrell J. Minger Page Two
FROM: Bob Manzanares.
RE: Trash Franchise
DATE: February 5, 1973
Advantages:
A franchise gives the Town more control and reviewing
powers over the business. The Town could have a direct
role in the establishment of rates and in criteria for
performance by the business.
Disadvantages:
Through the granting of a franchise the competitive_
aspect is minimized. If the franchised company is not
performing satisfactorily, there may be a period of
difficulties (legal), etc. before another company can
get the business.
I would recommend that the Town consider granting such
a franchise, properly worded, so that both parties understand what
is expected of them. I would also recommend that a three (3)
year franchise, with a clause indicating the Company will be reviewed
annually, be considered. In a three year period the Company has
an opportunity to expand and improve and also gives the Town time
to evaluate them more objectively.
BMlnmm
•
Bob Manzanares
by
LAW OFFICES OF
I ROBERT A. DICK
AKOLT, DICK, ROVIRA, DEMUTH 8, Ei5ERGER
JOHN R AKOLT, UP.
LUIS G. P.OVIRA
1600 WESTERN FEDERAL SAVINGS SUILOING
WALLIS L. CAMPBELL
718 SEVENTEENTH STREET
LA E.L S. CENUTN
CARL F. EIBFRGER
PP11
DENVER, COLORADO 802C32
WILLIAM O HEMP
ALAN C. DeMUTH
TEL�AHONE 303-222-ie0e
STUART S. GUNCKEL
ROBERT A.BACKUS
ROSERT L-ROBERT5
- January 22, 1973
ELL BENEDICT III
WrcH
RIAN M. BELL
ILLIAM F. SCHENKEIN
SAMUEL J. OWEN
RUSSELL P. ROWE
DONALO A.HOULEHAN
J. WALTER HYER M
EDMUNDO A. GONZALES
Mr. Lawrence B. Robinson
City Attorney, Town of Vail
P. 0. Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Re: Rights of A & D Enterprises, Inc.
in the streets of Vail
Dear Mr. Robinson:
JOMN R AKOLT
J- H. SHEPHERD
OF COUNSEL.
I assume that you have had an opportunity to consider our
letter of January 4, 1973, and the materials enclosed therewith.
In view of the private easement rights which'exist,in A & D
Enterprises, Inc., for access to its property by itself and its
employees, customers and invitees, I submit that any encroachment,
limitation or restriction upon those easement rights are unlawful
and constitute a trespass. That includes the present gate arrange-
ment. Furthermore, it would seem to me that inasmuch as the rights
of A & D Enterprises, Inc., are a matter of public record, the
trespass was and is a wanton and willful disregard of those rights.
Thus, we request that the Town of Vail rectify the situation
by removing the gate immediately and by compensating our client for
the past trespasses to date.
SSG/lc
cc: Mr. John V. Amato
Very truly yours,
AKOLT, DICK, ROVIRA, DeMUTH & EIBERGER
By A /711
box too
January 29, 1973
vail, colorado
Mr. Stuart S. Gunckel
Akolt, Dick, Rovira, DeNAuth & Eiberger
Attorneys at Law
718 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Re: Rights of A & D Enterprises, Inc.
in the Streets of Vail
Dear Mr. Gunckel:
8 1 6 5 7• 3 0 3. 4 7 6- 5 6 1 3
Thank you for your letter of January 22, 1973. Although I have reviewed
the various documents you sent to me on January 22, 1973, I have not had
• an opportunity to review the records in the courthouse in Eagle County..
It appears that A & D Enterprises may have obtained from Vail Associates,
Ltd. certain easements for the purpose of gaining access to property
acquired by A & D Enterprises, however, the platting procedure for Eagle
County at that time may have included dedication of rights--of-way prior
to the dedication to the Town of Vail in May, 1967.
In any event, it does not necessarily follow that the Town is prohibited from
regulating traffic on its public streets, notwithstanding any access privileges
that may have been obtained by A & D Enterprises. It is my understanding
that any patron of the liquor store operated by A & D Enterprises is allowed
to use the roadway to gain entrance to the store.
The Town Council for Vail has no immediate intentions to remove the.gate
that has been located on Gore Creek Drive for approximately two years. The
Council, however, has been willing to allow reasonable access to the property
of your client and has been under the impression that the current arrangement
is satisfactory to Mr. Amato. If you have any further suggestions relating to
the regulation of traffic in the subject area, please communicate same to me
and we will make further proposals to the Town Council.
Yours ve'1; y tru 1A
Lawrence B. Robinson
Town Attorney
LBR:lh
i
6
f
•
Section . Review of Preliminary Plans.
Any applicant who desires may in advance of application for a
building permit submit plot plans, floor plans, elevations, landscaping
plans and outline specifications to the building official for the Town
of Vail who shall transmit such materials to the Town Council which
shall, thereupon, review such material at a regular or special
meeting as provided. in the Charter for the Town of Vait. Within a
period not to exceed thirty (30) days from the filing of such material,
the Town Council shall either approve or disapprove such material ,
and in the event of disapproval, shall set forth in a written decision
the reasons for such disapproval. The Town Council may also grant
provisional or conditional approval by imposing specific requirements
which must be met by the applicant as a condition of approval. In the.
event the Town Council grants its approval of the submitted material,
the applicant shall prepare the plans and specifications in support of an
application for a building permit which will. be subject to review, if
prepared in accordance with the materials previously approved, only
by the building department for normal processing, and in that event
the additional thirty (30) day period provided in Section 1 shall not
apply to the plans and specifications in support of an application for
a building permit.
•
•
•
•
LEAVELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
A SUBSIDIARY OF RIO GRANDE INDUSTRIES, INC.
RALPH FRIZZELL
vi�C PA C•J�OCNT
Mr. John A. Dobson, Mayor
Town of Vail
Box 100
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear John:
ONE PARK CENTRAL, 5UITE 1250
1 5 1 5 A R A P A H O E S T R E E T
DELIVER., COLORADO 80202
P, O, BOX S 4 S 2 (Z I P S 0 2 1 7 )
T E l E P H O N E 3 0 3/ 5 7 3- S 6 7 6
January 31, 1973
The partners in the Leavell-Manor Vail Joint Venture appreciate the offer which
was set forth in your letter of January 8, 1973. Rest assured we ore giving it
serious consideration. The Town of Vail will have a definitive response by March
I, 1973. In brief, our idea is to come up with a concept that covers your needs
as well as providing for the Joint Venture's requirements.
Prior to the March Ist date, I hope to be meeting with you to explain our approach.
R F/cn
cc: Mr. John Amato
Mr. Charles Gersbach
Mr. Richard S. Kitchen, Sr.
Mr. Chris Allison
Sincerely,
f
Ralph Frizze
VAIL
MUNICIPAL COURT
January 1973
DOCKET
DEFENDANT
CHARGE & DISPOSITION
RECEIPTS
36
Tim A. Stone
illegal Parking - Pending
39
Thomas A. Simon
Illegal Parking - Pending
40
Patricia Marinello
Illegal Parking Pending
49
Glenn Beinfest
Illegal Parking - Dismissed
69
John Murphy
Illegal Parking - Pending
71
Carl Schureestedt
Illegal Parking - Pending
75
James A. Rosa
Assault & Battery - Pending
78
Danny Arguello
Reckless Driving - Resentenced
January 30, 1973. Fine of
$75.00 to be paid by February 20,
1973.
79
Konrad Oberlohr
Littering - Guilty
$25.00
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
Jeffrey N. Houston
Illegal Parking - Pending
•85
95
Jack D. Beals
Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty
$ 5.00
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
97
Melanie Hyrnyk
Illegal Parking - Pending
98
Wolfgang Herzog
Following too Closely - Dismissed
Limitations on Passing - Dismissed
108
Timothy Reuling
Expired Safety Sticker - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
113
Gerhard Kurt Lenz
Improper Passing - Dismissed
114
Jerome Blackwell
Dog -at -Large - Dismissed
Failure to Appear - Dismissed
119
Lloyd Thomas
Maliciously Destroying Property
$30.00
- Guilty
�122
Dollie Shaw
Parking in Fire Lane - Pending
124
John Ivison
Illegal Parking - Guilty
$11.00
Parking in Emergency Zone - Guilty
DOCKET DEFENDkgT
126 Dan Livingston
127 Lawrence Benway
129
*130
131
132
133
134
135
136
1.37
138
0139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
�148
149
Richard E. Campbell
Wallis G. Bergquist
Russell D. Bergquist
Gerald L. Lucero
Joseph P. Riddle
David C. Collins
L. Steve Ruder
David C. Peterson
Robert T. Lazier
Ronald Riley
Gregory A. Kelchner
Paul Clark, Jr.
Rudy M. Vigil
Elvin C. Bland
Robin J. Gardner
Hubert Karmeisool
Francisco Gonzales
Joseph Costales
Pamela A. Wedlake
David H. Hannah
David M. Coe
CHARGE & DISPOSITION
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Failure to Appear -- Pending
Assault & Battery - Guilty
Disturbing the Peace - Guilty
Disturbing the Peace - Guilty
Disturbing the Peace -- Guilty
Larceny - Guilty
Illegal Parking -- Guilty
Parking in Fire Lane - Guilty
Special Hazards - Guilty
Violation of Uniform Building
Code Sections 1305 & 1714
- Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Parking in Fire Lane - Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty
Illegal Parking - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Drunk & Disorderly - Pending
Indecent Exposure - Pending
Larceny - Pending
Drunk & Disorderly - Pending
Trespassing - Pending
Impeding Traffic - Dismissed
No Safety Inspection - Pending
Speeding - Pending
Speeding - Pending
RECEIPTS
$55.00
$30.00
$30.00
$30.00
$80.00
$ 8.00
-0-
$27.50
$ 8.00
Seceipts for January
1973 are
included with this report.
The
>`
total amount is broken
down as
follows:
Traffic Fines:
$39.50
Other Fines:
$245.00
Court Costs:
$55.00
TOTAL:
$339.50
Catherine L. Stone,
Clerk
•
•
VAIL MUNICIPAL COURT
December 1972
• DOCKET DEFENDANT CHARGE & DISPOSITION RECEIPTS
36
Tim A. Stone
Illegal Parking - Pending
39
Thomas A. Simon
Illegal Parking - Pending
40
Patricia Marinello
Illegal Parking - Pending
49
Glenn Bei.nfest
Illegal Parking - Pending
69
John Murphy
Illegal Parking - Pending
71
Carl Schureestedt
Illegal Parking - Pending
75
James A. Rosa
Assault & Battery - Pending
76
Peter G. Wyman
Wrong Way on One -Way - Guilty
$25.00
Motorcycle in Core - Guilty
78
Danny Arguello
Reckless Driving - Guilty*
$55.00
•
Careless Driving - Dismissed
Failure to Comply with Order
of Police Officer
Disobeyed Stop Sign (4 counts)
- Dismissed
79
Konrad Oberlohr
Littering - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
80
Peter Ventres
No Safety Inspection - Not Guilty
$30.00
Failure to Appear - Guilty
85
Jeffrey N. Houston
Illegal Parking - Pending
89
William Dickinson
Careless Driving - Guilty
$25.00
Disobeyed Stop Sign - Guilty
92
John Shalosky
Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty
$55.00
Assault - Guilty
95
Jack D. Beals
Parking in Fire Lane - Pending
.
Failure to Appear - Pending
*Initial sentence was to work for the Town of Vail for 30 days.
Since this is not possible, resentencing is scheduled for
January 24, 1973.
December 1972 -
2
•
UOgKET
DEFENDANT
CHARGE & DISPOSITION
RECEIPTS
97
Melanie Hyrnyk
illegal Parking - Pending
98
Wolfgang Herzog
Following too Closely - Pending
Limitations on Passing - Pending
99
Robert M. Kendall
Disobeyed Stop Sign - Guilty
$25.00
100
Jane Kelleher
Illegal Parking - Not Guilty
101
Susan Brenden
Wrong Way on One -Way - Guilty
$10.00
104
Wilhelm P. Blystad
Disobeyed Stop Sign -.Guilty
$ 5.00
105
Larry Parsons
Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty
$55.00
Disturbing the Peace - Guilty
106
Stuart Houk
Dog -at -Large - Guilty
$ 5.00
107
Craft Lofland
Impeding Street Maintenance
$10.00
- Guilty
108
Timothy Reuling -
Expired Safety Sticker - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
109
Brad Straver
Disobeyed Stop Sign - Guilty
$15.00
.
110
Lloyd L. Thomas
Drunk & Disorderly - Guilty
$25.00
ill
Arkidaj Birjulin
Impeding Street Maintenance
$ 5.00
- Guilty
112
Richard Broeker
Impeding Street Maintenance
None
- Guilty
113
Gerhard Kurt Lenz
Improper Passing - Pending
114
Jerome Blackwell
Dag -at -Large - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
115
Joseph Yarmolovich
Impeding Traffic - Guilty
$ 5.00
116
Rodney Cain
Wrong Way on One -Way -- Not Guilty
117
Edwin Young
Disobeyed Stop Sign - Dismissed
118
Charles Betts, Jr.
Impeding Street Maintenance
Dismissed
119
Lloyd Thomas
Maliciously Destroying Property
- Pending
120
Peter Ventres
Illegal Parking - Guilty
$14.00
121
Charles Morrison
Failure to Yield Right -of -Way
$10.00
Guilty
r DOL!KET DEFENDANT
122 Dollie Shaw
123 Fred Simpson
124 John Ivison
125 George Longstrith
126 Dan Livingston
127 Lawrence Aenway
128 Amado Lovato
December 1972 - 3
CIiARGE & DISPOSITION
Parking in Fire Lane Pending
Illegal Parking - Guilty
Illegal Parking - Pending
Parking in Emergency Zone
- Pending
Illegal Parking - Dismissed
Illegal Parking - Pending
Illegal Parking - Pending
Failure to Appear - Pending
Disturbing the Peace - Guilty
Resisting Arrest - Guilty
RECEIPTS
$ 3.00
$55.00
Receipts for December 1972 total $432. The total amount is enclosed
with this report and is broken down as follows:
Traffic Fines: $187.00
Other Fines: $175.00
Court Costs: $ 70.00
. TOTAL: $432.00
Also enclosed is a check for $50.00, which is the amount of bond
posted in the People vs. Marilyn Stewart on September 30, 1971.
This case was held open pending notification that Mrs. Stewart
had received effective counseling from her minister. This noti-
fication has not been received.
Catherine L. Stone, Clerk
box too . Vail, Colorado 81657 0 303•476-5613
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Members of The Town Council
FROM: Sign Review Board
SUBJECT: Vacancy on Sign Review Board
isMr. Richard Cole, a resident of the Town of Vail, has
made application for the vacancy on the Sign Review.
Board.
The Sign Review Board has reviewed Mr. Cole's qual-
ifications, and would recommend him to fill this
vacancy.
It should be noted that Mr. Cole's application was the
only one submitted for the current vacancy. This factor,
however, did not influence our recommendation.
Chairman
Sign Review Board
JM/spt
0
: a
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN COUNCI LOF THE TOWN OF VAIL
FEBRUARY 6,.1973
A regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at
7:40 p.m., February 6, 1973, in the Council Room of the Vai[ Municipal
Building.
Mayor John A. Dobson and the following. Councilmen were present:
Richard Bailey
John Donovan
Joseph Langmaid
Josef Staufer
Tom Steinberg
Gerry White
Also present were;
Terry Minger, Town Manager,
Larry Robinson, Town Attorney
• The first item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance No. 1;
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -
WAY, THE SAME BEING LOCATED WITHIN VAIL VILLAGE, SEVENTH
FILING, WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL. The title was read in full by the
Mayor and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance were available.
After some discussion, the Council was.polled as to whether they had read
and understood the ordinance. Each member indicated that he had. Council-
man Donovan moved the ordinance be adopted; Councilman Staufer seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and
Dobson voted in favor. The Mayor indicated that the motion carried and the
ordinance was adopted.
The second reading of Ordinance No. 2; AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE
REVIEW OF ALL APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUC-
TION WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAI L, was next on the agenda. The title was
read in full by the Mayor and the audience advised that copies of the ordinance
were available. In the discussion of the ordinance, Mr. Amato expressed
support for the ordinance but pointed out what he found to be mechanical
problems. Asking for working drawings could be unfeasible because or the
economics involved. He would ask that the Council require preliminary plans
only and that the review be made from these. He also expressed concern that
the time periods contemplated presented problems for the developer.
Mr. Amato stated that any plans that were. submitted prior to the final adoption
of the ordinance could not be reviewed. The Mayor disagreed, stating thatthe
reviews which have been done were an accommodation to the developer and,
if illegal, could be done again. It was clarified that plans for which an applica-
tion for a building permit had been filed previous to the first reading of -the
ordinance were not legally subject to review. Mr. Kindel asked if the Council
were comfortable with the legalities of architectural review; the Mayor. .
responded that he would like to see it become more of a legal funct[on of the
Town.
Councilman Bailey stated that he would like more clarification on anticipated
revisions of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Robinson replied that if the criteria
for the new zoning ordinance were available, the interim ordinance would not
be needed. This opinion vas supported by Councilmen Staufer, Steinberg,
and White. Mr. Minger added that the planning consultants are working on
the zoning ordinance and, as the various sections are available, they will be
enacted.
At this point in the meeting, Bob Royston, a planner from the firm of Royston,
Hanamoto, Beck & Abey, made a short presentation regarding the Town of
Vail Master Plan. Mr. Royston pointed out the tremendous growth rate or
Vail and how his Firm is looking at all aspects of the area to determine how
this can be controlled. Mr. Royston also pointed out some specific areas that
the firm Is reviewing: 1. the present recreational amenities and the designa-
tion of what recreational needs are not being fulfilled; 2. the present pedestrian
core circulation and possible improvements; 3. a valley -wide bicycle and
hiking trail system, 4. a land -use and development plan for the Antholz property;
5. .a possible Interstate noise buffer zone; 6. a better entry into the Town of
Vail; 7. a comprehensive transportation system; and 8. a long-range open
space/greenbelt program. In addition, his firm sees as parts of .its task,
assisting an owner in the evaluation of his non -developed land and developing
a reviewing procedure for the evaluation of developments.
Following this presentation, the next item on the agenda was the appointment
of a person to fill the vacancy on the Sign Review Board. Councilman Donovan
moved that David Cole be appointed; Councilman White seconded, approvalwas
unanimous.
The minutes of the meeting of January 16, 1973, had been previously submitted
to the Council. Councilman Bailey moved theybe approved; Councilman
Langmaid seconded; approval was unanimous.
0 In regard to unauthorized parking on private property, Ted Kindel pointed out
that private parking areas are always full with no means of enforcing the
private nature of these lots. He asked the Council for some legislation that
would provide means of enforcement. No legislation was drafted, but a com-
mittee including Clary Wall, Ted Kindel, Joe Staufer, and Larry Robinson was
appointed to study the problem and propose solutions at the next Council meeting.
Returning to the question of Ordinance No. 2, Mr. Amato presented a proposed
amended Section 4, providing for the review of preliminary plans. Councilman
Donovan moved to include the amendment; Councilman Steinberg seconded;
Councilmen Bailey, Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and Dobson
voted in favor of the inclusion. The Council was then polled as to whether they
had read and understood the ordinance; each indicated that he had.. Council. -
man Donovan moved the ordinance be adopted, as amended; Councilman White
seconded. Councilmen Donovan, Langmaid, Staufer, Steinberg, White and
Dobson voted in favor; Councilman Bailey voted against. The Mayor declared
that the motion carried and the ordinance was adopted.
As there was no further business, the Town Council adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
18 The Local Liquor Licensing Authority was convened at 9:40 p.m. A hearing
was held on'the application of Henschel Lyon, Ltd. for a retail liquor store
license, the verbatim record of which may be found on tape in the files of the
Town Clerk, Municipal Building, Town of Vail, Vail, Colorado, 81657. Fol-
lowing the hearing on the application, the Mayor informed the applicant that
the Authority will reach a decision within 30 days and the applicant will be
notified by certified mail.
As there was no further business, the Local Liquor Licensing Authority was
adjourned at 12:15 a.m.
�''_fkr
Town Clerk
Page 2