Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-09-09 Town Council MinutesMINUTES SPECIAL MEETING TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL 9 SEPTEMBER 1975 A special meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail was convened at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, September 9, 1975, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. Mayor John Dobson and the following councilmembers were present: Josef Staufer John Donovan Kathleen Klug Tom Steinberg Jim Slevin Also present were: Terrell J. Minger, Town Manager • Stan Bernstein, Finance Director Gene A. Smith, Town Attorney Daniel Herrington, bonding agent, Boettcher & Co. Mayor Dobson opened the special meeting with an explanation concerning the purpose of the meeting. With regard to long-term financing of projects authorized by the Town Council during this fiscal year, a bond election is the suggested method of financing. To call an election, a resolution must be passed by the Council at least thirty days before such election. Mayor Dobson noted that the date set for the election is October 14, 1975, in the Vail Municipal Building. The ballot would be divided into three questions which, in total, would allow the issuance of $1.16 million for the long-term financing of items already approved. The town manager commented that facilities to be included in the issue are part of the Vail Plan and have evolved over the last 6 to 18 month period. Question one would consider the athletic field, the K-4 school, the teen center and the ski museum; question two would include the rental space in the teen center; and question three would finance the I-70 overpass construction at Sandstone-Lionshead. Stan Bernstein explained the fiscal implications of servicing such a debt; he stated that it would be prudent to spread the burden of the cost over twenty years. He commented that there are marketing advantages in getting better interest rates in the fall and winter; smaller amounts issued at a time; budgetary and planning reasons; and the need for a guideline regarding the I-70 overpass. Mr. and Mrs. Colgrove spoke against the idea of a bond issue, stating that as non-resident taxpayers they cannot vote and have no say in the issuance of this amount of money although they, as taxpayers, are liable for the debt. Dan Herrington, of Boettcher & Co., then explained the bonding process as it applies to the Town of Vail. He noted that the security to the municipality in issuing bonds lies in three areas: property tax; sales tax revenues; and revenues from revenue -type projects. Discussion followed. The Mayor then asked whether the people of Vail want the various projects as outlined in the Vail Plan. There was a show of hands in favor of the direction of the town with regard to planning for the community. The Mayor then asked what would be the best way for the community to finance the projects. Several citizens then spoke for and against the decision to have such programs and facilities. Carl Oppenheim spoke in favor of the programs and projects being undertaken by the Town and commented on the community values and quality of life. There was applause following his comments. 0 Minutes Special Meeting September 9, 1975 Page 2 The town manager then posed the question, "Why are we here tonight?" He commented that Vail is both a community and a business and that the product we offer is quality of life. Mr. Minger also noted that in the past 14 years there has never been one Town of Vail taxpayer dollar pledged to service debt. He commented that citizens should talk about the community and its viability rather than making election platforms. Applause followed his comments. He noted that all the items to be voted on in the bond election had debate at public meetings. Dan Herrington then read Resolution No. 6 in full, commented on the three questions to be considered and the various details related thereto. He noted that these general obligation bonds would be backed by a 2% sales tax collected by the Town, as outlined in the ordinance created for that purpose. The security for the bonds is the tax dollar. Mery Lapin then requested that the Town government consider a competitive bid for the issuance of the bonds if they are approved. He commented that, from a long-range point of view, it would be beneficial to the Town to have other bonding houses interested in the Town of Vail. The town manager commented that it might be a disadvantage to change the market at this time. With regard to the Town's financing of a portion of a gymnasium in the K-4 school to be constructed in Sandstone, there was a question by members of the audience regarding the cost to people who already pay county taxes for the school. It was agreed that this was a good opportunity to provide a facility the size of a gymnasium for a small cost compared to building an entire building. With regard to the possible construction of an overpass on 1-70, the town manager explained that it would be possible to construct an underpass, but that the Highway Department indicated that they would not favor it. With regard to the Resolution in question, Councilman Staufer moved to approve the resolution and adopt it; Councilman Donovan seconded the motion; all present voted in favor (6:0); and the motion carried to call the bond election. As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 PM. ATTEST: Mayor ' own C1 erk U1