Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-10-19 Town Council Minutesor r1 t__I S 0� MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 19, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, October 19,1993, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Mery Lapin, Mayor Pro -Tern Jim Gibson Tom Steinberg Rob LeVine Bob Buckley MEMBER ABSENT: Jim Shearer TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Larry Grafel, Acting Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Bob Armour stated he wanted to keep the Davos Trail area as open space and, requested that TOV purchase the forty acre parcel in the light of proposed development of the Trapper's Run area. He noted the Davos Trail area was the last large pine forest undeveloped on the west side and felt it would be a great visual loss if developed, Davos Trail was a highly used recreational area, and environmentally, it was the second largest deer migration area in the State. He felt the proposed development of the Trapper's Run area would have a negative impact on the entire neighborhood there, including traffic and safety problems. Kent Rose delivered a petition of 739 signatures to Council. Mr. Rose read the petition title into the record: 'We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision know as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations:' The petition included a summation defining the "immediate neighborhood" as Chamonix Lane west of Chamonix Road, Garmish Drive, Arosa Drive, Davos Trail, and Cortina Lane. That immediate neighborhood consisted of 163 platted lots, 38 vacant lots or lots under construction, leaving 125 lots available for canvassing of which 107 were represented by signature on the petition. Mr. Rose noted those 739 signatures represented 86% of the above identified immediate neighborhood. Gary Arthur, proposed developer of Trapper's Run, felt lack of communication was responsible for people's opposition to development of the area. He briefly discussed the proposed project. He asked Council what funds were available for purchase of open space or what alternatives there were. He advised that a presentation of what was being proposed would be made on Monday, October 25, 1993, and encouraged all interested parties to attend. Mayor Osterfoss indicated Council could receive the petition at this time, but the issue would have to be taken under advisement. Item No. 2 was Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance submitting to the registered electors of the Town of Vail at the Regular Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, the 16th of November, 1993, the question of whether the Town of Vail sales taxes should increase $2,100,0W.00 annually by the imposition of a new sales tax of 0.9% on restaurants and bars and a new sales tax of 1.8% on lodging beginning on January 1,1994, and each subsequent year; the annual revenues shall be designated exclusively for the construction, marketing and operation of a performance and conference center; authorizing the Town of Vail to increase debt up to $14,400,000.00 by issuance of negotiable interest bearing bonds for the purpose of providing the construction, marketing and operation of a performance and conference center; providing for the cessation of such portion of the tax increase that is no longer necessary to service the revenue bonds; setting forth the ballot title; providing for notice of the election; providing for conduct of the election; providing further details in relation to the foregoing. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Tom Moorhead advised that the wording of the proposed ballot question presented within Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1993, on second reading, was set forth as a result of discussion during Council's last Work Session. Jim Gibson asked if the final sentence of the proposed ballot question indicating that if additional bond coverage was required, other sales tax revenue could be pledged as determined by Town Council, had to remain in the proposed ballot question. Both Tom Moorhead and Steve Thompson advised that John Buck, bond underwriter with Hanifen Imhoff, recommended that Vail Town Council Lvening Meeting Minutes 1WI9193 provision be left in to assure an "A" bond rating and to help avoid any need for TOV to have to purchase bond insurance coverage, the approximate cost of which was estimated at $110,000. it was noted the need for other sales tax revenue was a remote possibility, and Mery Lapin indicated TOV might still have to buy the insurance anyway. Steve Thompson confirmed that. Caroline Tremblay JP Stated the Vafl Valley Performance and Conference Center Steering Committee recommended approval of this ordinance as presented on second reading at this meeting. After brief discussion regarding the possibility of a revenue stream shortfall, Rob LeVine moved to approve Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1993, with the deletion of the final sentence of the proposed ballot question indicating that if additional bond coverage was required, other sales tax revenue could be pledged as determined by Town Council. Mery Lapin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 3.40.170 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail deleting the definition of "charitable." Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Mery Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1993, on second reading, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 4 was Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1993, first reading, an annual appropriation ordinance: adopting a budget and financial plan and making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its fiscal year January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1994, and providing for the levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1993 tax year and payable in the 1994 fiscal year. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1993, on first reading, with a second from Bob Buckley. Before a vote was taken, Steve Thompson reviewed the funds within the ordinance that were different from in the past, including the Parking Structure Fund, the Vail Housing Fund, and noted the mill levy decrease from 6.35 to 6.19. He noted that 18% growth in assessed valuation would generate more revenue than TOV could keep under Amendment 1. It was noted mill levies could no longer be increased without going to a vote. Steve also noted the Enterprise Rind was exempted under Amendment 1. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 5 was Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance establishing Special Development District No. 31 (Golden Peak House) and providing for a development plan and its contents; development standards; and other special provisions; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicants were Golden Peak House Condominium Association/Vail Associates, Inc./GPH Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Mayor Osterfoss read the tide in full. Mike Mollica reviewed the applicants' requests to accomplish the proposed redevelopment of the Golden Peak House as detailed in the Community Development Departments (CDD) memo to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) dated October 11,1993. The five requests included a request for the establishment of a Special Development District (SDD), a request for a Commercia Core I (CCI) exterior alteration, a request for an encroachment into View Corridor No. 1, a request to rezone a portion of Tract E from Agricultural and Open Space to CCI, and a request for a minor subdivision involving the inclusion of the rezoned Tract E parcel into the Golden Peak House (GPH) parcel, and the inclusion of a portion of Lot C into the GPH parcel. Mike also reviewed the twelve understandings as detailed in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, which the developer agreed to as a part of TOV's approval of the establishment of SDD No. 31. This included the details of the restriction of employee housing units per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance, streetscape improvements including the applicant's contribution of $32,000 toward the redesign and redevelopment of Seibert Circle, permanent dedication of open space to TOV by co -applicant, Vail Associates, Inc. (VA), dedication of a public pedestrian easement across Lot C, located between the GPH and the Hill Building, to TOV by the developer, deed restrictions on two three -bedroom dwelling units to be included in the GPH short-term rental program at all times when they were not • occupied by the owners or guests and, in addition, the developer would agree to restrict the remaining two lock -offs in the building as well as the two accommodation units in the building, also at times when they were not occupied by the owner or his guests. Mayor Osterfoss asked for more information about that restriction as it was different wording than usually seen by the TOV. Mike advised the standard wording normally used was in the Subdivision Regulations which essentially allowed an owner to use his unit only twenty-eight days during peak ski season and also stated it could not be used as a permanent residence, it could not be lived in longer than six months. Mike noted Clark Willingham, the developer, was proposing that these units be placed in the short-term rental program for the GPH whenever they were not used by the owner or his guests. Mike observed that left it fairly open as there were no assurances about the duration of time an owner would occupy these units. He acknowledged that was a deviation from what had been done in the past. Mike continued review of the remaining understandings in Section 8 including language regarding the possibility of a future improvement district for streetscape improvements and/or the implementation of the Transportation Master Plan, and language Mike referred to as direction to the Design Review Board (DRB) with regard to certain exterior elements on the building, including the understanding that the proposed tar and gravel roof for the building was acceptable to the PEC. He pointed out that Section 9 of the ordinance included the PEC's action, as well as the recommendation of staff, that the retractable enclosure over the outdoor dining deck not be a part of the project. He Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 1049W added that a letter of protest against the application requesting designation of the GPH as an SDD dated October 18,1993, had been submitted earlier today by Jim Lamont on behalf of the East Village Homeowners Association, Inc. Mr. Willingham felt the main controversy was over whether or not there should be a deck enclosure of some sort and discussed the details of a proposed compromise. This was followed by Council discussion regarding the size of the deck enclosure. Drawings of the GPH project were displayed. Mr. Willingham reviewed desired changes in their proposal and related those changes to the changes and understandings listed in Section 8 of Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993. He was particularly concerned with the language of Section 8, Item 3, regarding the minimum area of open space designated to be dedicated to TOV. Mayor Osterfoss advised the proposed clarifications could be worked out with staff between now and second reading. She indicated if the SDD concept was to be supported, there needed to be reassurance that there would be some major contributions coming back to the community in terms of permanent open space. Tom Steinberg felt an appraisal of the CCI square footage versus an appraisal of the open space should be conducted, and felt TOV might end up with all of Tract E. Mr. Willingham said the land VA was proposing to give TOV was approximately 3,000 square feet. Gerry Arnold, representing VA, read in full a letter dated October 19, 1993, signed by Chris Ryman, Senior Vice President, VA, regarding the open space parcel dedication proposal. By that letter, VA agreed to convey to TOV no later than December 31,1993, that portion of Tract E (comprising approximately 2,000 to 3,000 square feet) bounded by the centerline of Mill Creek on the east, Hanson Ranch Road on the north, Cyranos property line on the west, and a line which would extend from the southeast corner of the Cyranos lot easterly to the centerline of Mill Creek on the south, as approximately represented on a map attached to that letter. The letter stated that because VA felt that TOV's vision regarding uses for the above described land were basically consistent with VA's vision, they proposed the conveyance of the land, subject to six conditions detailed in that letter. After discussion regarding those conditions, Ms. Arnold stated she would take Council's suggestions, including the request that the land dedication include land south to the bike path and that there be a permanent easement or lease for Pirate Ship Park, back to VA management for review. Mayor Osterfoss advised that Tom Moorhead also needed to review the proposal. Mr. Willingham continued discussion about proposed changes and clarifications for the balance of Section 8 of the ordinance. He proposed to either delete Item 9 of Section 8 altogether since their new plans would include a modified deck enclosure, or to amend Item 9 to read, "The Town Council's approval for the establishment of SDD No. 31 includes the developer's request to enclose approximately 200 square feet of the Los Amigos outdoor dining deck on the south side of the building by the use of a ReKord glass door system." Further comment included expression of concerns about that request. Kristan Pritz was directed to informally discuss this issue further with the PEC members before second reading. Tom Steinberg suggested the developer be required to pay into a loading dock fund. Mike Mollica noted that the specific language in Item 8 of Section 8 of the ordinance included the Streetscape Plan improvements and the Transportation Plan improvements. Mayor Osterfoss asked Mike Mollica to review what criteria the PEC used to recommend approval of this ordinance. Mike stated the SDD was the most important aspect of this. He noted the SDD was an overlay zone district which allowed TOV and property owners flexibility with regard to the development standards. It also allowed TOV to weigh public benefits associated with an SDD and to balance that with the development standards. Staff felt an SDD was an appropriate vehicle in this case primarily because of the existing conditions on the site. He noted the GPH, as it presently existed, was well over on almost every development standard. He referred Council to review the displayed GPH Zoning Analysis chart. Mike stated that to review a proposal based on those development standards and to stick to the specific numbers was very difficult, but staff had been able . to review the project based upon TOV's Comprehensive Plan's goals and objectives. The criteria used in evaluating this proposal were detailed on page 7 of the CDD memo to the PEC dated October 11, 1993. Specifically, Mike discussed the Vail Village Master Plan's Goal No.1 and Policy No. 3-2 which called out the GPH as a primary renovation site. Mike said staff had looked at the pros and cons of the project and identified the public benefits of the project, such as employee housing, improvements to Seibert Circle and the rental restrictions on some of the accommodation, lock -off and dwelling units. He advised Council that the architectural changes and modifications that had occurred to the project over the last two years were fully addressed in this same memo. The SDD allowed staff to review the architecture, landscaping, streetscape improvements, etc. He said the PEC and staff recommended approval of the project with listed conditions and understandings. The criteria for CCI exterior alterations, zoning district amendments, and minor subdivisions were all also addressed in the October 11,1993 memo. He noted the property was encumbered with easements and that was the primary reason staff was supporting the request for a zoning change to CCI. He added the project would meet all of the minor subdivision criteria. Mike summarized the view corridor encroachment criteria, and stated staff supported the applicant's request because staff did not believe the encroachment would negatively modify or effect the overall purpose and intent of creating View Corridor #1. He stated the View Corridor Ordinance also gave staff the ability to look at view corridors or vistas from other public plazas. The PEC had identified the area at the top of Vail Town Co—il Evening Meeting Minutes MOM Bridge Street as an important view, and that was the primary reason the project had been redesigned so the central portion of the building had been kept open, so that view was going to be maintained with the redevelopment of the site. Discussion followed about the view corridor modification processes. Jim Lamont, representing the East Village Homeowners Association, (EVHA) read in full the previously distributed letter of protest dated October 18, 1993, against this project. It was the position of the EVHA to oppose the creation the GPH SDD because the proposal exceeded all zoning standards for the CCI zone district, the existing building exceeded all zoning standards, the expansion of the building beyond zoning standards or an expansion of a non -conforming condition was a grant of special privilege not generally available to all property owners, and unfashionable architecture or failure of the property owners to properly maintain a building was insufficient cause to exceed zoning standards. The letter of protest offered a number of recommendations to achieve the building's exterior upgrade and reconfiguration of the interior space. Mr. Lamont requested a meeting with staff and the applicant to review the numbers. He also stated he wanted to see a financial guarantee that the view corridor would be protected. He was not assured by design drawings, etc. that the view corridor would be protected during construction and felt fines should be levied against developers if the view corridors were encroached on. Mr. Willingham responded to Mr. Lamont's comments by citing the project's benefits to the community. Hank Frazier, George Knox, Kent Rose, Harry Frampton, and an unidentified seven-year Vail resident encouraged Council to pass this ordinance to renovate the GPH. All felt the existing building was not characteristic of Vail quality. Jim Gibson, Bob Buckley, and Rob LeVine expressed strong support for this project, indicating it was a positive change for the Town and beautification of Bridge Street. Mery Lapin stated he had no complaints about the architecture of the building, but was concerned about the level of development in the Town of Vail. The smallest building was the original one and the largest one (showing the most mass) appeared to be the latest one. He asked when the bigger and bigger buildings should stop. He felt TOV was giving up a lot for the density of such buildings. At what point was the obligation on the part of the land owner to improve buildings without additional square footage. He felt the result was going to be an eight and nine story Bridge Street. He agreed the GPH project was an attractive building, but asked at what price. He felt the density and number of people that could be handled and still have a quality experience for the tourists and locals was diminished by greater and greater density. More people would be in the restaurants and shops and TOV had not increased its infrastructure to handle those people. He felt the quality of life he wanted, and what he wanted for the tourists, was not represented by the increased density of this project. Tom Steinberg agreed. After further review of the purpose of SDDs and view corridor protection, Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1993, on first reading, on the basis that it satisfied the nine criteria required for an SDD and also met the twelve conditions of approval recommended by the PEC as listed in the October 19,1993, CDD memo to Town Council, and on the condition that terms of the amount of land proposed to be dedicated by VA be reviewed and confirmed by second reading, and that Section 9 of Item 8 of the ordinance be amended or deleted, and that the $32,000 Streetscape contribution be due upon issuance of the building permit. Bob Buckley seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, staff was directed to work with Clark Willingham on Section 8, Item 9. A vote was then taken and the motion passed, 4-2, Tom Steinberg and Mery Lapin opposed. There was a brief meeting break from 10:05 Pm to 10:15 P.M. at which time all reassembled for the next agenda item. Item No. 6 was Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance approving a Special Development District (known as SDD No. 30, The Vail Athletic Club) and the development plan in • accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicant was JWT/1987 Vail Limited Partnership, aka The Vail Athletic Club. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Shelly Mello first reviewed the CDD memo to Council dated October 19,1993 regarding the parking history for the Vail Athletic Club (VAC) in response to Council's request for additional information. According to that memo, after researching the issue, staff found that the parking requirement as calculated in 1977 appeared to be less than the parking requirement which would be assessed for the same plans today. The research showed there was a net difference of 5.39 parking spaces between what the staff calculated on the 1977 plans and what was calculated for the existing building. The issue was briefly discussed after which Mayor Osterfoss noted the difference between the existing and the proposed parking for this project was approximately nine spaces, and part of this proposal was to have those nine spaces provided. Shelly referred next to the CDD's memo to Council dated September 30,1993, wherein the parking issue was further addressed. It was noted parking had been a long standing issue on this site. As detailed in the September 30, 1993, 40 memo, staff research on the issue had found that there were a number of variances granted to this project. Different arrangements had been made over the years for parking on TOV land as well as other properties for this project to address the deficit. Variances had been granted for a total of twenty spaces over the life of the project. Using today's standards, there was an existing deficit of 58.4 parking spaces for the project. There would be a nine space parking requirement increase as a Vail Town CounciL Evening Meeting Minutes 10119MJ9 result of this expansion. This was based on the difference between the required parking for the proposed project and the existing development. The applicant was proposing per the PECs recommended action that an additional six on -site parking spaces be provided and three spaces be paid for into the parking pay -in -lieu program which would bring the total to twenty-nine spaces. Ail of the parking spaces would be valet. Shelly Mello noted the CDD memo to Council dated September 30, 1993, outlined the PEC's recommended conditions on the project. The first condition required the applicant to restrict 52 accommodation units (AUs) for permanent short-term rental and that they would not be subdivided in the future to allow for individual ownership. The Condominium Declarations had to be amended to include this point before an occupancy permit would be released for the project. The second condition addressed employee housing, requiring the applicant to provide one 1 bedroom and one 2 bedroom employee housing units (EHUs) and restricting them per the Town of Vail Employee Housing Ordinance. The EHU restriction agreement was to be signed and submitted to staff for approval before a building permit would be released for the project. These EHUs were to provide the minimum standards specified in TOV's Employee Housing Ordinance and would provide housing for a total of six employees. Four additional PEC recommended conditions addressed pay - in -lieu parking for three spaces ($8,000 per space) and removal of two exterior parking spaces adjacent to the structure entry so that area would be designated for loading and delivery, landscaping on the south side of the building to improve the public access through the area and returning of it to its natural state, DRB review of architectural details of the building, and requirement that the applicant work with the DRB to address signage and landscaping at the base of Blue Cow Chute as it intersects with East Meadow Drive. Kristan Pritz noted the CDD opted to try to get all of the parking on site was in an effort to follow what was in the Vail Village Master Plan to get parking on site and improve the street area for pedestrians. Shelly Mello reported that three letters had been received from the public in opposition of this project, one from the East Village Homeowners Association (EVHA), one from Rohn Robbins on behalf of Joan Lamb, and one from Joan Lamb, an owner in the Mountain Haus. Shelly detailed the zoning analysis statistics for this project as set forth in the September 30, 1993, memo. She advised staff had discussed at length the criteria to be used in evaluating this proposal and said staff supported approval with conditions. Staff found this application met the purpose of the SDD. It was felt the project was in keeping with the same SDD intent previously discussed at this meeting. Staff felt an SDD provided flexibility for the project while providing amenities for the Town. Staff recognized that the existing building exceeded the underlying zone requirements, but believed that due to the site and location it was suitable to allow for such deviations as proposed in the application given the goals and policies in the Town's Land Use Plan, Vail Village Master Plan, and Streetscape Master Plan. There was discussion regarding the Accommodation Units (AUs) stats. Mery Lapin disagreed that more AUs were needed based on occupancy on a year round basis. Shelly Mello indicated that there was an increase in occupancy of hotel rooms between 1991 and 1992. Mayor Osterfoss felt it was interesting to note that Beaver Creek occupancy levels were even higher for hotels during peak season and she was concerned about developing more first class four or five star AUs in Town. Stan Cope, representing the Vail Athletic Club, presented a model of the project for review. He advised the building was already condominiumized. He discussed removal of condos from the market and offering of hotel rooms to accommodate people in Town. He also noted the project had three or four public sides with regard to landscaping and streetscape, being a corner building. Mayor Osterfoss asked if the developer was paying for the improvements. Rohn Robbins of Dunn, Abplanalp & Christensen, noted he represented an adjacent Mountain Haus property owner, Joan M. Lamb, who was unable to be present at this meeting. Mr. Robbins felt the bottom line of this whole issue was the same as the question asked Mery Lapin asked during the discussion of Ordinance No. 28, 1993, regarding proposed SDD No. 31, i.e. when was enough enough? With regard to proposed SDD No. 30, he did not feel TOV was getting anythuag of value in return for the greater density, greater traffic, and greater parking problems imposed by the creation of SDD No. 30. He felt in the interest of preservation of open space, view corridors, and in consideration of the financial interests of landowners in the area, it would probably be a reasonable compromise to review this as he felt all of the units were excessive. Shelly Mello clarified that the additional GRFA was not attributed specifically in the projects dormers. There was discussion about Ms. Lamb's particular situation and the impacts on her view of the Gore Range. Mr. Robbins stated that view was a significant view in terms of the property value. Jim Morter advised that he had been asked many months ago by three unit owners in the Mountain Haus to monitor the development being proposed, and, if necessary, to take a look at the design of the improvements if they were affecting those three owners' views. After monitoring the project throughout, he advised that Stan Cope and Mike Barclay, architects for the project, had been most cooperative and ingenious with some of the solutions they had come up with to address many of the Vail Town Council Evening Meeting NUnvte. 10/ M3 concerns of three of the owners. Mr. Morter said Joan Lamb, owner of unit 560, presently enjoyed a Gore Range view from her master bedroom. He used visual aids to show how much of that view Ms. Lamb might lose, but it was concluded the view loss depicted was not scientifically calculated. Kristan Pritz explained TOV's approach when individual's views were affected by development. She advised there was not an ordinance protecting private views from all angles, but staff tried to address this issue to make sure no undue impact was created on surrounding properties. Jim Lamont, representing the EVHA, stated that the concerns as detailed in his letter dated October 18, 1993, to Council were essentially the same as for the proposed Golden Peak House SDD previously discussed. He reviewed suggested ways to bring the VAC building into conformance with the envelopes that currently existed, including reversing the roof dormers to indentations as had been done on the upper floor, south side, thereby reducing the bulk and mass and reducing the GRFA, denying expansion of the restaurant area on the north elevation bringing it back within the original building envelope, that the dollar commitment for $120,000 for streetscape improvements be specified in writing, that the VAC should be responsible for maintenance and care of the open space garden park and that Council consider dedication of this park to Mr. and Mrs. Fitzhugh Scott If this project was approved, and, he emphasized consistency with regard to parking and employee housing, which, as stated in his October 18, 1993 letter, stated parking and employee housing requirements should be met wither on -site or off -site and added that a "pay -in -lieu" parking fee should be required of all parking located off -site. Rob LeVine was in favor of the project and stated he felt TOV was getting some benefit and the project was an improvement for the area. He was concerned about the loss of the neighbor views. He stated he would vote for the project on first reading, but wanted to see the view impact mitigated. 40 Bob Buckley was in favor of the project, noting the large gain of AUs. He agreed with Rob about the need to look at mitigating Ms. Lamb's potential view loss. He was not concerned about 6,000 additional feet because most of it was in the mass and bulk of the existing building. Rob pointed out the need for AUs because of the trend towards condominiums falling out of short term rental programs and not being rented as much as they had in the past. Bob added the reason he voted against the VVI was because commitments made on that project had not been lived up to. He liked the trend towards more AUs. Mery Lapin said he had nothing more to add to similar logic expressed regarding the proposed GPH SDD. He felt this building was already over what it was allowed, and felt the same effect could be obtained without the addition of the approximate 6,000 additional feet proposed. Tom Steinberg felt this project was a big improvement, but felt moving the EHUs off -site should be considered with conversion of some or all of those EHUs to hotel rooms to up the hotel room quantity, because he felt more hotel rooms was what was needed long-term. If there was any way to pull the two dormers impacting the views into the roof lines, he encouraged that. But, overall, he felt TOV was getting something for what it was paying. Jim Gibson felt this project was a positive move. He felt this building started out too big to begin with and it was being expanded so he had trouble with the mass and bulk, however the overall design of it was being improved and it would be a much better looking building styled to the Village. He felt the park area in the back should be cleaned up and developed into a park area as an accommodation for the streamwalk. Mayor Osterfoss noted it was planned that the DRB would work with the applicant on that proposal. Kristan Pritz noted the direction was to make the proposed park look natural rather than formal. Tom Steinberg suggested signage stating it was a public park. Stan Cope said they would be responsible, but it was not to be assumed they would be developing an Alpine Garden. As long it was within, reason, they obviously had a vested interested in making the back of the building look nice. After brief further discussion regarding modifications to be made by second reading, Rob Levine moved to approve Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1993, on first reading, based on the staff memo indicating the project was in compliance for an SDD with the amendments to the ordinance as • discussed: (1) That a minimum of $20,000 was to be spent by the developer on the design and redevelopment of the landscaping on the south side of the project; (2) that a minimum of $100,000 was to be spent on the design and installation of the specified streetscape improvements, (3) that the reference to the "natural conditions" on landscaping the south side would be deleted; (4) that the reference to the parking fee and the Denver CPI would be clarified; and (5) that the owner would be responsible for the maintenance of all improvements. Bob Buckley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-1, Mery Lapin opposed. Item No. 8 was Resolution No. 12, Series of 1993, a resolution renaming Kel-Gar Lane to Black Bear Lane. Mery Lapin moved to approve Resolution No. 12, Series of 1993, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 9 was the appointment of Election Judges for the November 16,1993, Regular Municipal Election. Mery Lapin to appoint Karen Morter, Kay Cheney, Mary Caster, Joan Norris, Pat Dauphinais, as Regular Municipal Election Judges for the Regular Municipal Election to be held on 60 Tuesday, November 16, 1993, and Mary Jo Allen as an alternate judge for the November 16, 1993, Regular Municipal Election as detailed in Town Clerk Holly McCutcheon's memo to Council dated October 7, 1993. Jim Gibson seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed Vail Town Comet] Evening Meeting Minutes 10n"S unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 7 was Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance rezoning 7.710 acres from Agricultural and Open Space, Section 18.32 to Low Density Multi -Family, Section 18.16 located 10 between Tract C, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch and Parcel B. The applicant was the Town of Vail/Vail Housing Authority. Mery lapin moved to table Ordinance No 21, Series of 1993, until November 2,1993, with a second from Rob LeVine. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret . Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: FM'UdPL-W�dommc- Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto • B PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) 1, ALLEN KNOX do solemnly swear that I am the PUBLISHER of THE VAIL TRAIL; that the some is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Eagle. State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly In said County of Eagle for a period of more Public Notice than fifty-two consecutive weeks next priorto the first publication of the annexed legal notice or PUBLIC NOTICE IS REAM OWN uw the Taws Coundl of the raven of Vall will rnaet d a that said newspaper has been admitted tothe United States mails as second class 0.1ab r. 1993h"rin7 0 p.m In the uno9th day o1 P.badvertisement; Ocldr, 1fiD3 d 7.J6 p.m. In the Cwnoil Chan. matt er underthe provisions of the Act of March 3,1879,orany amendments thereof, andthat sold bare d uu Va: Munidpd Building; 76 South Frontage RoM,Val. Oolo do,fmthepurpa.aa newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements w. m i°fa.�.,� N.'u'°d `' r within the meaningof the laws of the State of Colorado, The proposed budget. WQ-r nga eapitd ow pram"'""" plan, flnaidil sta'anant and sans -W of erpxdihaaa — avddrla for pubre in - That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue wbefi^n in the %mwws depwUnMt a " Vei-: Muniayd Buk%V, 76 South Faw"ge -Flood, of every number of said weekly newspapers for the period of l consecutive Insertions; Vag. Cobra's durfrq regular business tcun. M .fnewtpd pads" ant Inuild to aWnd_.and . and that the first publication of said notice was in the Issue of said newspaper dated b°haad " •;: TOWN OF W1d OC a 19 9'� and that the last publication of said notice was In the Issue f : L T cMoCutchox of said newspaper dated. 6GZVf' z 19 i� Pub iahad in The Vail Trap on WOW IS" In witnesswhereof I have hereunto set myhandthis dayof. 19 `)-J Subscribed and swom to before me, a notary public In and for the Cddntly of Eagle. State of Colorado, this 30� day of. CxT-Of3'�,_ 19 93 �lUk1U 44 My commission expires. February 11, 4997 • (MM ����E. NE4CK�C7 H0� 1 IDEVATtftE-0 A5 Ti TA L. POVCT E D BOYS I VT!ANAT ©K Ut�lDER WtAOMACTION 36 A\/Atc...A5LE FQ� CA�AVA5SWkO i Z GINS4CNE.D � � SiCa t�1��7 �T�TIc� ti 4 �' Z S I E :NNlS 269 uµ�,pTTE� 264�' )21 r''p'S LINP1- P.1YED 27,t 1 2743 �2733 10 15 10 2 26l3 9 1 304 $94 25 �'74 Rp D 23 4 212� 4!4 A 1404 2l2p f Tam o 23l3 A y�Npv 5 TR8 2399 PN TEXAS zzsa ��'/ RED•--E1 5'tREAMocF- 3 2274� 2284 w mfi H"'' a 2!!3 Biel 681 J'SGI *661 otoz .- si 91, 9691 at y161 09 61" ov 'v 9061 9161 99 qS61 9v S'O61 tp " LV ogil svoHI'MIll 3,'Oro6S 10 4. 14 .1h VANtAlvo INA f 0 OZ rlwoz ro"o-41 902 �bl91 1', 0 "toz V*60Z oz lz 7, 2 SMO�G Gt4' 'Jiv"A Ics "00 bSlt vsv �q S31 1401sl PETITION TD THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE Wet 2 � 'i`1t4VU s �. / �1 �0 v&a % /;_:7 �30,q (rar-rn" ,j f q PO �3 V4, (c_ i n Uhl P5ox 357l, VAIL (ENmUC ki i s ryauC�r i ��rc l.e ► 2���� i C6 7 IC�B T5 � Z� G-rn /."V rat v n t,Lc`r Ll33 r ,Lre Creek (�c.� �L�c lvi N lbt �2 ? -o. 3a et a Vo, t 1 ; CO _ Q T n M id I.L161- DaY, 072 _� ?iG1.A- ��LI,�1 a�od.. ��`e.('c.�t,,t✓1��i. '� ;�n�' � �] �ik�7", dtri L� 5 VAI yl l (d,� !!�. i�rsx 3�l S �. ► Y Q P� "il� S; �fRrlb� PETITION TO • THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS ✓a-L GNATURE 1.atY4104d, cMig M"-Ians )0, accG oA 3q t acala 'e .>C l (sav Av1 )K) ��-- JSA+v0-T y7,t�`� C,h ec, �x t_A-n► — VJrr r_, 53Iln D� v1 l- u.l tL bn 3 1 tin,o L� e v V"k (fs ��,�I Cam_ _�. kL `GA Wh 6WLV r`` h Otnp U , Ilttr l \� C.11Ml/may' VAIL 60 £�'l� �_.( > /�✓ O4 ,1-- caa 8? i Lo . F-0110 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * lJ PETITION TO THE TOWN COt1NCI! TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent- public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME:: ADDRESS SIGNATURE ffII �j 1jailAp { �o op)C &1725 �a-pI --- No 1614r-&'us Z l (11 L6_5T �k.1 / aX �` l °C' /ft//e � ------�- � �lac�no ) Y t a�ki Cav' c o �a,r-. �vX � � �i�- fly► � � •s"VM �� �-►`seoler 75, (r)4L. -P,/l�, j o 303 a V/4-' � PEIIFION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ,,� ADDRESS SIGNATURE ll 6 + 2.G/ k1 K12 El /,F. 1� SA G' ,4 k fV e S'tLj 5 '2A ?� a r1 rbo )( C� C C"r ocr—Ia—S- 73 now ^�,42 arAw E:E:Rwa7E:zw p-m� �. . � | yEI||ION ! ! | lU9 [+>Wh C0UN[11. ! |UNM 01 V8\| � ^*^A*°^^^A*��* ' / ^ , vpu" » `...'- .n opposed t ri ! jnmiuer / ! ' still be ». " ' | !"^.~....^ � utu i| / �w ^dvrru"|y affected. we /urxnor Pw�.�^oo � / ~ f Lo uoox|dnr yorchwyv of \ropporo Run to ' ptlo" of oyn' syocn` oouvu.�aqo reoroa�|wv*l . lopportunitly and '4�� enAm)me the quality of life fmr tutore Qunor*t�wnS. . | PRINTED UM AVUKE55 SJUN&|VKE -�x��' � . | | / . . i-- -------'~ ' ~ � ~------� -----~--- '- ! ! � ^ ....... .... --- � . / . ! | � • PETITION 'I U THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrout)ding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE. LIS 41 -V uv�l b DAQID L, GLkR{e- 3971 B(C,1+0144 AD VA -IL, 1)04— t �b ow Ala) \I (L *�Y, Gt �Aa� R• �� PD.1 Ig�17�. CJ (w _ "VU Pax 36s- Am±. (6 F« 2t) (la�o4 L�1o,� im PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNAT RE • F i�14ec-s �ZA �tJt_k1-1 � ��- �r 1 r � Ka kf el- Jr z ,i vc.�.s,aa 07 �z - 1%a 1L_ PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL A TOWN OF VAIL �Y We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME- ADDRESS SI NATURE Z q63 Lei [A+- h-cr SM ki E ��i- c-, 4 V{iIL Cc, 4--1(z �ALN- �kL-- 'bbbb-, WcL" V eP - bo f i-4cx n �L4 bq 2 W,e.clac.o t-r).. Vc.- PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAI_L We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED N ME: ADDRESS SIGN. UR �( rim_.-. �aals, C4�• �:11+ <'/ M t3 6-eal \J AcL- 4�,&l I�AWI-gA 1 2953 �6'viN h3i�K1NPJ� %Q.. �ifi .. (6 VGLO ` �!w DOaq t)e'r ?I wA us4G,L� VAC( �i IP.rk CNQrfT FiFRSeF�� �, / P _1, •�'i 7_ .J o Nh1 r. PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL • TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to considers'rappers RAM -tisat--mo--v.:a lances - will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes 'will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS GNAT RE J 11, ple� doz�.&rral P Ph Tel Po B' 6`%e5, tn+;jz44-IA-l.G�ii �aPSay, 3 3 V4IL. �Tc-0 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. 0 PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS KI .' fC'l'L l f4D 2-LP-1 _"jL� C c4nrry k t 1}k s �. `J Z4aD �v �t C:Y�ccawn,x L4 IC SIGMA 7 11 �)V�a� LQ Paz �vim% �`" rP.l �en��v Z o C� 1AAIf ■ *6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE aver 1(,Yff& rn . ail f vn Casre &- (-70q 1%0 Co r ZS74 �r �� �lCr,� 5 �cr ✓ i �a J r j 943 A p,n.,; �rvT�i 302 A579 AC"Sq -Del rr r 0 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Ran. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SSIIGNNATURE ring PJ" rTc�t�D t815 �z3 �� �iRg �� - 1 LAA4-.-- C rL lIA&�- 02 Lqlmmp %/Uf1 J� n n�LII/LPr j{ n !(!_�/�tJi)A1: Cb k1b» Pef- 7z- f�3ox 91 0� f1�Yr✓ l'l�i�H2v �� C�r��� lA vvV�5�167 E • 0 u PETirioN TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: 64A)i Z J&Io L 9 ADDRESS vSlg facys, 'C SITUI JV®W�) PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. 1P PRINT.ED NAME: 7)4-p-�Z ACNMr L- SAILLCF- r-, ADDRESS /3/7 IA-1, IGNATURE 0 0 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ' I" �LI✓ /� 1K7 Alb I�e rave- Du 2Y �J"L V SIGNATURE �Q ! AAA � t InkslKclrn 33(5q93 CIO_ R-16-3 t V IS13 o , t P "5144 ffd?O _ 159i Vint, �r✓>Ci veus l ''//c 1 P.O , 6�5)xi n�/ �'0� PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it .can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Ruvi to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE y���t� } i�t? Ilv� �r7 4V E K-S 1� �, i ��x�7� \i c�- C I .1L-'�. ()nh0 /0(,)1 Vol I fe PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRIN N M ADDRESS S �C�r1fnT t el CO 1y 95 C'�fr(Mo�ViX `1 /�r_f"r( l,cv��0 21�y Chovonix, 4-j 7, Y 39 kato ►y A —(0 k.. 1 f �yr�.. a %' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are upposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE >� r Roses R137 Ckavm,l/ PAY ZvFGovG/a, aY37 r,44Ac�-'x 6AIo "7t�CJ�•br" ���L✓rfz/G• 2 `i-2�7 �+.j-+9-e'F7�.iN� jf �'� ...._ NNC7-1 r� l rf( yL 2 �©9 d X 0 (.0 ou 1 ,1 410 - Z 3 cl),4/1-/V It/jfc lab �9 �354 ! G 03 FF 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETI HON TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS aid --1-1e.7e' r I �., �. i 1-} � •f., 77.7 I�e �,� QIJor iiy,7p� t k2171c��✓: /a �vllii�5 p.0,8OX 398G V�'l�Co B1G58 P.0 - &y g91q; 6 �rtbar� has-iu n c�rN goo �d sir c, 2� Nit • • SIGNATURE I c. 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * i PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent: public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: 51GNATURE Dante r-'t �err? l(q BOX VC4 ti IAA 1bs`-i 0141 rt 0 X . l �O ^U cn. CCU . .T � v Aare _ �cclht� m k ' gl ADDRESS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEIITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE An 1'Y "t-e S�a"'Je- 5 3�� 1� 11 �Da� E 0 X o .�C��ro• �%h�i��� �.U��exl�� l �'Q�')lS S 1b5b Ua,i I VQ tI-C VA - �,O c abr'ta �tx tjox vai M has c Lau irie. Mean&, Box IS139 Avom 9167-b GharUine, M.c�4cnieg * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PEI ITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will nut be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. . PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SJPqATURE �' C�iIC�O�/J� a4�i�' a rm r sct_ A4 Z`ISM �gIS,Cll �R dY� �: c�l�/�//�/119�.�6�,3 G�e��.�2 .fig • d�� 9 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of._ppen space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are nn��d to development of the proposed subdivision known as lranuer5 Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE / " 77"', i 4-- 0 0 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be,adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Councir to consider ,purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations_ PRINTED NAME: / ADDRESS -k ✓ ,e S/iCPC /'73 /cy�`%yiLL2tA 6F'Q C`J E - oY ormscY revs </2 9 B lie%nay Lave d L .`1 vz2�U� � � ATURE U PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: Sum,) ) !7o,-11 ADDRESS 2-45,a7 P k%55 A- l )')(-/ 5t'/ 6VI/ 7 1 -Z( TG f"7 rSGI� oyca T'1 • E GNATURE\ PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ,,4 L c' Ne12 rf r� 6„ ate_ 1 r C i a E 0 ADDRESS S GG�NAATTU 1 \ At L r _./ �J _ PLu Zit`] AJO-� ( .� l PETITION TO . THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. 11 PRINTED NAME: 4110,5 F&-4e Ot-4 UN.D S-4Ai,d2.4 a is 40p ROL -1-1 EfiTd A/ �/1 V\ Gt�'l �gnom� 1 ADDRES5 SIGNATU x 6S3 4 Cav-*%?a . Z5`b8 �RR�/ISCN D,2. V41L- �� J z4�d� ( tits cN 1 UA; L �� i 0 PEII[ION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, tl('at wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: rQti�tW, dz..,v ADDRESS STORE 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SI, .0 ic_G 0 (Is, 1A u PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: J , 57S _� xW14'l'/cic- If IN -1L I'�IQ`� b0�2�1QW! • r�L ADDRESS 17r3 6v����, 1J2. 1116 140V4 ta,,X f rvay �- -(7-- '', 6 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME; V/- �Cx ADDRESS , 080 a4 W�IU 2 8 c.K D2 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE a 5A A peer �3tivd W V) r - faxi 00 4� U 1 t • 0 l7kv,bn PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS --r,4Z- k,-,= Iti IG116 019-v6211 -Dur3 D w cn1 Z h4! s- JXvm 'Tk- f ��s'q ,JA6J V 0 K(o ?6 49- 2fiZ7 A45A P� t� 3s-,> SI NATUURE r-OWW . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • \J E PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational Opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE l<V. WT 905 C AR©SA '0 IF-, �w�72� k6yn A FDSF— 6 02 7 M205A D/2, rkP �1AE( IAA51�W5 "')G Off 22- U i Qs("2 Ac cos L -? b �5�6 041-Co�eii�� �� PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL" TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed 'to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: 12► �Trr�uC N A) / ADDRESS S1GNAI 6x2381CA k1c Y-Q �S �,S 6n 71X14 I I 'Al ,.. � u �7Ci i E�� In � • ��� �1r .ti�, Qn'Cluj, ,�x 4- ;. 260Z DNA L-f� um -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE 3`l i-i o�1[z►S 5 1 ��� A t Pic c�- T Z� �6 As Amw 5 i3r>w � � � �,� rd� 3_ v.ai� c. ,• �� �.c. .c72 J�9-ic., 0 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL rI We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: -9LIV1I 4.1 w�c�G. �S ,Qsew GG.�vr��a �c/oFF ADDRESS SIGNATURE GHf?tS �C9 i iZ- 1Zd 1,A C i � 4,0_AIZE: +tEEW 2.0. i�oX 752� {�(Zrcl'/✓ fiGrnl� _�&/C �-51 va'- CU isltpS�S �/� ICrG��..-i FtGY�o • 0 lb P PE1 I TION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: E eTH Nam,- �ci3olZ.ek4-f �e—rn3LoVJ5�c Lc%— ADDRESS SIGNATU Y-Z #'/IZ41 t c� � ate- f ► g � , i�G..-(� w %?ax 3,V-3 5S /,4/G r �Cea��4 3 _ a, l � i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * n LJ PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE AS'79 01,Y110 '�576 -D414114 I rYl M Sflm .3tuPr Pk- M T1ZU,, L 66 '4a 09'4 f� l . I'��c . - (.ti l� uc �%L a.5' s'e-aa Q ✓�L (tJlClt�_, .: , 0 C, J PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances t+ti_L1_be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negat?:vely impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: Cols ���� etm kj,4 15,6 ADDRESS 24?0 c is%ox aq%) CAaln,'Al,a)e ;a Zo C"�,J ,, a v SIGNATURE 1" GJ�-e1P f/u�-fir A -64 tom, :��� �< vvta t S�/t � � e ✓�, �;; (,J,t k • PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNATURE C�hrI�I ERb 2i95"D ehainenlvc- 4h_ A 1 tVW1111,�,� /`1Bfi Q Erh ° "Wa,"a CH4MONIV IN D-F) jy-�dem Nlli5i t_ al�n U.&MG;i'y A -4- \4111. .40 4) _ UerfL_ a Y�� {� Yl V v r ! SO S" ! ��9 �I4 nioYljil �on�ld l'�rs,89 Cahrx Lh . c l' - CG1. o C !A -Alai- du itA ,+ 2W u � hAr�Y; n1.C. �n � C3 l'AA� . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL • TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNA RE k:LG F 2- /rt 2 70) r;, c Z _ PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS% v ��+3�ew Fc.Li �g6�O U," ro-\ Ara Cuai nam o' 231 r . `ore ire& T)F- SIGNATURE C�6k1nrn1 A� n� (H,4114OVir l.v Lfs Ci 7 04<6 L(11i_- 13 . w Nr- a�ofl�^HA9DN/Y�Ff �'� a C/O PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL . TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. 0 PJIN V D NAME: ADDRESS S GNATURE �0'tM r 6,C- 666 L Co �fb �=J Pa,x,3 f PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Irappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. PRINTED NAME: �7} ADDRESS J ��GNAT,UU I 151_"1 l A M. trn lJC 1-76 -2 RQ�,1 ��, VAt r / CD ro f-,�(T7C 4155 vau �[) K1-6 C �. s��+�-n�� �� � } r�P• [���� � ill �'�b� Et x -3&5 4_ Via I L, co V /J I 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly. believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIG ATURE r� 3 Z • Ci I'o3vX /-J 110A/ Cd AL JoAAlo, ED t,5�w, no Iced v l PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. is PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS /-y s�� ')6/O A'a s 4- 0 R 99a,5Qr Ate a ui- �668 &'Cm ACAA r]),, r i�lalra Lor�rne� i r // �L ors 1461 A ' ()yt& L,4v� YA �, 6F- 0 �to(,,e .Aro,s� SIGNATURE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: G-.i7tlitl��� C �zcir.r-rx ADDRESS p� 9i6-S-7 SIGNATURE �� F to-Lg �f0 / i-, 40g15 F.S prune- �qI 4Q, 99 " ,) �) (t C—' a?J",—) �)�L -Z 4:), Al" 10 Z.5 �� �-e-'i0iilee Thdi L Mann I �orald Cpl. a.u,`75 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if -it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: L kc V. ti Y�xa� ,4, Uec-1�2- ADDRESS SIG TURE �G 7-1 M. d! i'o Pr) 6) x 13L! Gwww q SPRtZdJA t ! 91)1-� �v kJowQ Ck1'�iL - PEIITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances will be granted, that no adjacent public lands will be utilized or otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life for future generations. • PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS 5A)Ub' ioivE z dY 0 SIGNATURE 11 PETITION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF VAIL We the undersigned concerned citizens who support the preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and strongly believe in maintaining the quality of life in the Vail Valley, are opposed to development of the proposed subdivision known as Trappers Run. We herewith petition the Vail Town Council to consider Trappers Run only if it can be shown that no variances pu will be granted,-tnut no adjacent 6fic lands will be utilized or. otherwise negatively impacted, that wildlife and wildlife migration routes will not be negatively impacted and that the surrounding neighborhood will not be adversely affected. We further petition the Vail Town Council to consider purchase of Trappers Run to advance that preservation of open space, encourage recreational opportunity and enhance the quality of life. for future generations.r PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS SIGNA URE ��4"1�J S DAUC7a Tefl�