Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-01-19 Town Council Minutes• • 0 MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 19, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, January 19, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Jim Gibson Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Rob LeVine Bob Buckley Mery Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation of which there was none. Item No. 2 on the agenda was final public input and discussion regarding the future of the Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge, a small pedestrian bridge running parallel to the newly refurbished International Bridge. Mayor Osterfoss reviewed the chronology leading to the decision to remove the bridge, and noted subsequent to the decision to do so, further public input regarding the disposition of the bridge had been received by Council and staff. In response to the additional public input, Council had directed staff to conduct a final public hearing detailing options. Larry Grafel presented slides showing various views of the bridge, and explained in depth the advantages, disadvantages, and costs associated with four options Public Works had explored for the bridge including: (1) removing and reusing it, (2) renovating it, (3) removing it and building a new bridge, or (4) repairing it. After brief discussion regarding technical aspects of the options including the condition of the stream and the stream bank, streetscape intent, including why removal of the slab was important to bringing the stream closer to its natural state, Sherry Dorward stated she had not seen an understanding of what really animated public space in Larry's presentation. She felt this bridge gave people a connection with nature, something not felt from the International Bridge which she felt diminished the experience of being near the water. In her opinion, loss of human scale, loss of intricacy, and loss of connection with creek would be a major mistake. She said the redundancy of two bridges did not bother her, and felt people wanted to be close to the water. Sybil Navas submitted a petition of over 600 signatures in favor of saving the bridge. For reasons echoing Ms. Dorward's, Linda Fried, Diana Donovan, Joe Staufer, John Cogswell, Nancy Rondo, Chuck Crist, Galand Aasland, George Lamb, Paul Rondo, several other residents and one long time Vail visitor also voiced opposition to removal of the bridge. For the record, Mayor Osterfoss noted former Mayor Kent Rose had phoned her to state he was in favor of removal of the bridge. Bob Buckley moved to keep the Gore Creek Promenade Pedestrian Bridge in place. Rob LeVine seconded the motion with direction to staff to spend a minimal, amount of funds to make needed safety and visual improvements to it. Before a vote was taken, Jim Gibson and Tom Steinberg communicated their reasons for feeling the bridge should be removed. Rob called the question. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 4-2, Jim Gibson and Tom Steinberg opposed. Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicants were MECM Enterprises and Commercial Federal Savings. Shelly Mello called for questions. Fred Otto directed Council's attention to the 1119/93, letter regarding the status of negotiations toward the resolution of concerns expressed by Council relating to Westhaven Drive, through Cascade Village. The letter had been submitted at 4:00 P.M. on this date by Arthur A. Abplanalp, Jr. of Dunn, Abplanalp & Christensen, P.C., attorneys for Westin Hotel Property and James Wear of Wear, Rosen & Travers, attorneys for Cascade Village Association (CVA). The letter stated the Board of Directors of the CVA had discussed Council's request for a cooperative approach to the resolution of their concerns regarding Westhaven Drive, and indicated CVA's Board believed its members had arrived at a mutually • acceptable resolution to those concerns. Tom Steinberg asked how the figures stipulated in the letter were calculated. He asked if the applicants had obtained engineering cost estimates for the whole road including drainage improvements, curbs and gutters, compacting base, and general corrective action. Mr. Abplanalp stated he was not aware of those issues being covered. Mr. Abplanalp explained the research done to arrive at the figures detailed in the 1/19/93 letter, but the letter indicated until such time as the road surface/subsurface investigation was completed and the conditions were determined to be acceptable to TOV, there was significant risk the cost of road improvements could be much higher than estimated therein. Tom Steinberg asked if there was a figure of what it would cost to bring the road up to TOV Code entirely, and Mr. Abplanalp advised there was not because there was no requirement that it be brought up to TOV Code before dedication. Lengthy discussion followed concerning details regarding bringing the whole road up to TOV Code, various aspects of the applicants' proposal, and what CVA was willing and able to fund. Mayor Osterfoss felt, from TOV's perspective, there were constraints laid out within this SDD, including an issue relating to setbacks which were not what they would be on a usual TOV road, an issue relating to a curve that did not have an acceptable radius, and the pedestrian bridge height problem. She felt TOV would be willing to work with the applicants within those constraints, but she felt the issues of paving, drainage, curb and gutter, compaction, and whatever went into that process had to be fully addressed to determine the extent of . TOV's responsibility for those issues. She asked the applicants to clarify the level of responsibility they were offering for those issues in their proposal. She felt the proposal did not firmly establish whether the issues would be taken care of before a TCO was issued, or not taken care of if the cost was more than the amount they had estimated in the 1/19/93 letter - $48,000. Mayor Osterfoss asked if there was a dollar limit on their proposal. Mr. Abplanalp said he felt that the dollar limit was $48,000, the amount CVA was now spending on snow removal. Mr. Abplanalp felt the applicants' theory was that the association would be able to start setting money aside to address Council's concerns beginning with the amount they normally would expend for the year'93294, if TOV would take over maintenance of the road beginning in the summer of'93. Further discussion followed concerning the association's costs for this proposal, and the November 1, 1993, improvements completion date as indicated in the 1/19/93 letter Mr. Abplanalp was not certain how firm that date was. He said all applicants hoped to complete the improvements as soon as possible, but if TOV was in a position to begin maintenance and snow removal without the completion of the improvements, then the November 1, 1993 completion date would not be a strong prerequisite to the whole package being proposed. Regarding the November 1, 1993, date, Mr. Otto said if they had completed their heavy construction by November, 1993, then they would have no problem putting the asphalt overlay in at that time, but if construction was not completed by then, the asphalt would be put down during the summer of'94. Mayor Osterfoss noted the 1/19193 letter indicated a TCO would not be issued until there was asphalt on the road. • Mr. Abplanalp referred to the November 1, 1993 completion date as a relatively soft date, but if there was a good reason to move that date back, it could be modified at Council's discretion. Mayor Osterfoss asked if the applicants then considered November 1, 1993, a hard date for TOV to take over maintenance in order to save the applicants' money. Tom Steinberg moved to continue this hearing for one month during which the applicants could obtain engineering studies and a firm bid for the cost of the total construction of this project to bring it up to TOV Code in all ways except for the pedestrian bridge, the curvature, and the narrow right-of-way. Jim Gibson seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Jim Gibson explained the purpose of this was to allow the applicants to provide TOV with the information TOV needed to ascertain what its financial liability might be. Tom said the alternative would be that TOV would never accept the road. Mr. Otto felt the issue was not whether or not this road should be a public road versus a private road. He said what Council asked them to do at first reading was to indicate that CVA would take an active interest in trying to get the road fixed so it could be dedicated to TOV. He felt it would be impossible at this time to get firm bids to find out what that would cost. He said they were trying to indicate to Council that they were going to cooperate toward to the solution and would contribute financially. He did not think there was anything in this ordinance indicating this had to be a public road. He said it was a private road now, it was not accepted for TOV maintenance, and TOV was bound by the provisions of Section 18.40 of the Municipal Code. IPTom explained their proposal put a top limit on what the association would spend, and that 2 put TOV at liability if TOV accepted it. There was further discussion about whether the road was public or private road, but it was determined, whichever it was, it was part of the SDD, and the whole SDD was the issue. Rob LeVine felt it would be negligent to approve any changes to the SDD without once and for all addressing the traffic and road problems. Then 10 decisions about changes appropriate to the SDD as a whole could be considered. Mayor Osterfoss felt applicants had made an excellent, good -faith effort to move toward resolution of this process, and felt the motion on the floor was a request for additional information so TOV could make a decision as to whether it was a realistic proposal. Mr. Abplanalp did not feel a firm bid could be gotten as there were too many variables at this time. Mayor Osterfoss asked if the motion gave the applicants enough time to obtain engineering information, or whether the discussion should be continued until engineering information could be obtained and presented to TOV for analysis by the Public Works Department. Ned Gwathmey, architect for the project did not see how that information could be gathered in a month. He noted they had been on hold since first reading, the developers would not allow them to proceed, and further delay might now allow building this summer. Individual Council member comments followed. Council indicated if there was a willingness among the association and developers to take care of the compaction, the base, the drainage, the paving, the curb and gutter, and those types of improvements, then TOV would have no need for additional information. The only reason for TOV to have additional information was to ascertain the extent of potential cost to TOV. Jim Wear, on behalf of CVA, stated all CVA had authority from their Board of Directors to commit to at this meeting was $24,000. Rob LeVine and Jim Gibson felt they could support the ordinance and have TOV take dedication is if the road with the existing constraints of the bridge, the curve, and the setback problems if there was a guarantee that the compaction, the surface, and the drainage were brought up to standards. Mr. Otto was concerned about the word guarantee. Jim Gibson reiterated the entire road was important to all of the Cascade Development, and therefore had to be considered important to TOV. He felt there had to be a resolution on the entire road. In response to Mr. Abplanalp's question as to whether or not TOV was in a position to participate in this, Mayor Osterfoss said it seemed clear that TOV was willing to participate with understanding this was a project with constraints. Secondly, she said, before TOV agreed to participate, TOV needed an estimate of the cost of that participation. Council was representing taxpayers and that information was needed before any financial commitment could be made. Mayor Osterfoss, Tom Steinberg, and Jim Gibson were agreeable to continuing this discussion before one month if the information concerning TOV's potential cost was available by the next evening meeting. Tom noted this was an SDD which had been split apart and now the different parties were discussing the problems among themselves. But from TOV's viewpoint, it was an SDD, and the original developer had accepted the liabilities, those liabilities were not TOV's liabilities. Mr. Otto argued the issues being discussed were different than the charge Council gave them at first reading, but Jim Gibson clearly noted Council had • suggested that all entities of the Cascade Village borrow the money, if necessary, to bring the road up to standards and then use the assessment levied each year to pay off that note, and as soon as the road was brought up to standards, TOV would take it over. Mayor Osterfoss said the issue was not a question regarding conditions of approval. The road either met the criteria for traffic and circulation or it did not. Mr. Otto said the traffic and circulation to his project had been addressed, but Council repeated the whole SDD had to be considered, not just Mr. Otto's project. After further discussion, Mayor Osterfoss felt TOV was at a stalemate without additional information, and it was determined that the applicants defer to Director of Public Works, Larry Grafel and Greg Hall, TOV Engineer for direction on the criteria needed to be met. Greg estimated it would take one week to obtain the requested information and briefly explained what would be needed. Tom Steinberg called the question and removed the stipulation of the original motion asking for a firm bid, instead asking for a very solid estimate from the applicants. Mr. Otto asked if it was TOV's position that this road had to be a public road. Mayor Osterfoss said TOV's position was the road had to meet traffic and circulation conditions. Mr. Otto asked if the road had to come up to TOV standards to be a public road. Mayor Osterfoss said she did not think it should be assumed those two things were necessarily correlated or non -correlated. Tom said the whole road had to come up to TOV standards whether it was private or public in order to improve the circulation within the entire SDD to its maximum ability with the grade, setbacks, and the overhead restrictions already taken off. Before a vote was taken, it was agreed to allow applicants to return as soon as the requested engineering information had been presented to Greg Hall for top priority analysis. Tom Steinberg changed his motion to continue this item to February 2, 1993. Jim Gibson seconded the change to the specific date. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-1, Bob Buckley opposed. Item No. 4 was Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance of the Town of Vail, Colorado, decriminalizing traffic infractions; deleting the availability of jury trials and jail sentences for such violations; and making amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Rob UVine moved to approve Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1992, on first reading, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0, Bob Buckley no longer in attendance. Item No. 5 was a requested review of a sign variance request for Curtin -Hill Sports (previously Vail Ski Rentals), 254 Bridge Street/Lot 1, Block 5A, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Jack Curtin and Teak Simonett. Tim Devlin advised the applicants were not present and requested the item be tabled to the next Vail Town Council meeting. Tom Steinberg moved to table this item to February 2, 1993, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. • There being no further business, Tom Steinberg moved to adjourn to an Executive Session regarding personnel matters, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 0 Respectfully submitted, Margaret . Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Acting Town Clerk Minutes taken by Wanne S. Deto CAM]WAN1 QA We the `'undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this cseekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: 2. 3. ; �b1 C�� GVA C�� MN ILA �W t.De ,( Ill"sI/) P) o u 31 . �r _ �e f ly✓GP �{Z� �p 3 3 l�r.�e 4 5. k t G 17>_ l_ 212! , �2a r r AroE �t�. L�: lfo4� 11 �+,� �o �lloii 1zJz3j�Z , 6. On s. c�f� �a( ;m P.O. &X Aju-n CO ���z� rzlzsl9z 7o ,a. _ "'-tN ' o ox 7,A A V Lv/v) 13. 14. �n.'_ L/�fr- iuAD 475- 6c--e6p4 UHF i�� 16. � � f,�� / � /�iI Gax i8. _(/ l��l all Ohlz25 LA;, = / 3 s� +-tom+ i tom_, RECEIVED JAN 1 9 t993 INDIAN PAINT SRUSH 183 Gore Creek Dr, VAIL, CO 81657 (303) 476-4660 r1 !.J • We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: -14 &..`_: r / i ! 2. 5. oz 6. a _ t ; P .Y r� 6�P N 8. i/ ��v.� �%rt x c� �93 .}9�troo�s �i'he,�� 7;01-p 9. lei r�11 5. 14. 15. D ��- Q °2 C7 0. c� �"��. ( t1 17. L 18. l 19. t Iti ' 1 22. <112i �� li _;r A(t�o(� rr �� l S ! q 23. 25. RECEIVED JAN 1 9 1993 IN 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the • intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. GN T E. NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: 5 Ct 2.P.r1o�o \lr 11nUX 1/J ) J c, A,: r *rx AA 05z7 APB , \,IA1 -A lz/o��/�z 5. h•r i5 k—� ww��r _ 7 7 2 S -S r t( p I� 6. Mw-aelo 6 C'�°�11. .Y6Q,12. 43 13 (�y-Yt� � rn % 11'3 %cLe n C 14. �/f lZ. l�f f�R r /� ir� t //L1�?/1%lU 6641 635 % � AI GV. 15.,.4.(.�(J!.%C/ 16.t..c� 17. l ,./- 19. 21. /v 22. :, , v i�:l� CVkt� 1s. /( 0105 1L far � r�r•6% ����E� '77Z Ji��. p ��It111v %il��/�sCrr� ��- 7s'� f �35D AX.rajl ' ��A'/`ilSpA��iAfu.Pk�y T _ le- 1145 fi L l ! q y zJ a-i1}c %vGar G19,2o�� G�Zz27���0�0 !"�GZU7✓ /�' `/Li.�srz� RECEIVED C � s D"g}yy�f 0 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the iintimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. S G ME / � _� }1D jDRESS: DATE: f 2. `r �.9r G c �f. �� 4 3�i �,G.t ='� 3. lJ`%`�1 4�5 Cis � (1 4. /�I�� ✓ S'C7. S % f���9 r ,DI' /`7 L2 S �- i�'ll�-/::��,-ems //�/ ��� � �Hc�/ �•` 1 ��"���. CJA)D� ESL N8Z6iPeA� j 12. 13. / C.�/�J �%f�`/' /ll�C l �% it t((U //Y---2 11 14. 0021 C / �{YxJ� /�(r( V W, AV(- r��rose 67 fat oa,� 6;C act . 3V 6193 16� U% 17.18. / 0 D 19. �iV w r `�"' `ll�� �tG� _ �. B cri( 01 21C 22. �' .,� oZ O ss-.�sa-+.J,�• �-f1 i C C- T7 6 �� c ups-.� �% �'6 S. �a r g 'ter? . we A � f 23,%)�TC�tssi,��i� �i,��,�� s, w, I92z >Zri�nii t `ra 25. _ G2�•�Qd�il�.�e� �` !�/Cof (.'ae�ca. ak5u / / a RECEIVED JAN 1 9 199a 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the village -core. SIGNATURE: NAME: 2. .1 .t % N01 M d A 4 1fo 15. 16. 19. v✓I n arn4 t 22. ADDRESS: DATE: r05 9/. j V,c) 3 <� vol wkCd �;�� UJ.Los�b�ltc�A�� l,�ii t �� C`o ►2� Ila VO4 t RECEIVE[3 JA i 8 JF3 0 , ff af smaii, ar,-, ', ge Vail. ;rTh �-Amaller-k intiCY q 46reeks4de-, SIQW TURW;- NAME w mijammi/A 22. 23. 24. 25. on the T6wn ot, V4,i!V to Mop the .to the cdll�, in ge is ftar 6 the Vill'' e 6. ADDRESS: rZqM fW65 ��� DATE.- ,A )A - A5fA 41 cqf 3 PVA-1 LIT9 f �ayxn —7by*yo -4-Y Ll '22- 61,9 71?,4 c kiq Lm,2dlhag, SIM &AuA MAId qO9zp1-&c I RECEIVED A. 19 1993 Ll 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. S,WNATURE : 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. �1. 121 18 ,so { 21. NAME: ADDRESS: e7 DATE: Cherr-,'� cx ��� _� / l<.1�fCo��— �-c h Loci aA 136k 32-q(o Uat�( 12/19 Din). Ca vcliII ✓-Cy / i 4r� �t &y !f' �•h (3 / d9 iJ /, t✓ �95�'a.� W✓�c'�' L t' �. E !/ �'�. 7.3 �-� iA ( 1Ca%s4s c:l i � s � - 1 �,�1,�_�u._b v ; i 0. Uc�c ra re. c_lalt rr _3 93 t Y f R�J� !/i/, ✓z i lrf d S • (i/c.,� c yr �e ` �" 7' / ti % `f `� ��' 1C� I-�e �G� ��UC, u • � �r . Avs� 'n T� (` 1Z-e1�A1T1F6125Q�vJ26,; 22. E�1h�l/ • "ILL-7/ wv-i 23. /4, 5i .r 24. I k � 1B1C] ouN� i�rcivnic� 25. RECEIVED JAN 19 1991 L- 0 c We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller.bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. IGNATURE: NAMF,j; ADDRESS: Av I DATE: 4R3 (LEQ 6441O6'r6&C 2. �----� ld fit 5 i�A _ tl+l/- CO Ozea 7 !wo , All 4. 3. �,, Sinfi $dOq 5. 7. 8. t }!C, v 9. ' �r_� . ��}� �� �; pp t �6 � �t rcvtc{�i�-� ne 1 &A Ji . c f i) �Z% � c.�.� �� Gca�C erg Gf% _ _ . r3 7, - 12. ..� [��[r. '� G 0�i b% f � t l3 � �Pt L ?.�C. 14.� 16 . tS 7, 3 ?U'fL 17. 19. 00. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. RECEIVED JAN 1 9 199� 0 6 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: l,- 2. 3. Z, L",Vl) 0 4 4. 5. �, q� �� rr �k 6. i._,_ � 7. TtW'A 5 41 lraOaxo v& 9' 8. crOr 4c,iS 3L t?-o• oogg I AA Vud- CAP-��e 9. VC) C6�Ti �.w.0 c,-�aahad 4&-� Amli /* JA 12. �`A / P,�l 1I Co 0 r-v-q l c G & VY -6M6 J. p � r 13. � C� Se-�+- CasrAe- S'd 6z feS�AKo�,, 14. CAVC(- C o[v ��w.�e Ir��%` ///OCR✓ ^ t to 30 n6o rS 1 15. i t Sam S -3DS Fzi r Ate -A Y-,O sari (c ZORIQ,bw-, 16. 17-. Q 6t �/��1 �t`� i��i Z eT-- 1$: liwbl� � �'�r Lo � Win✓ 5�-5�1 19. wt�u %�u� %z�r low /n✓ 40. 21. 23. C� .r.� lJG�°� P� Y"lL`[�AN 161 �v r�JL1S/�� 61- UR. (o 2 4. Gfi„ q V0 / N l s r %��.e��ruQ �(Jd . 11,P66 25.15 RECEIVES JAM 1 � ��1 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge .is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: . cam. L CM4410p17 /ff_�eCo,4-FCa-e'O.-, /z flgl9z 2. SibrIM_. Afix M /tea), CfWL pf /2 - N -92- 3. L/ c-�e�C w�£L "°l[_e11)C_K /yvo/ '&Za_4/f of 4. rz � Fa 8oe /6I,3 lz 19-�Z- 7. sans fl ��� 32s�+v,Clr�fDr1-0 (�A, �016� lz(/Oz 8. .f✓-'7aY��- t.�. ,`mot SrAo � 21z) V_�rZrGr2�+v�ih� ���19/!3— 2o.64/� y3�r���nf /'o• ��`3Z /2�i9 �z 12. �C "Q r%!�l P ( t�nll �o l �C%�/o // �i / / i (�O t i 14. 15. { uNvv-� �_ YI/1 4� & F �r_ 2 � ��� 16. h(�,, /J/ ���1�iU�� ' z W_ J d��L� /Clac 17.✓7� l�Q��V657 �99�Z L � AU Am,, C ft-�., v 1 z- t �- G2 22.,, ki / T ��� CI-� 70 V �� (�/,�.t l l Z-1 c1- i 2- zL 24�np//�l�iii� 25. �7l errfz— �a C2+rcn.�rN�� C_ U/zsfr�5 V� C /9 �z RECEIVED JAN 1 9 1995 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME. ADDRESS: DATE: YA2. 3.��,�r, - /lf: �� � c . .. �� , a P�O—z vla, 5. G� IV 1VA��J 6. ���. C l?Z2GzJ L 1-7W FT 1✓a��`o ��I� 8. / 1 �i G��t �C G[ �� Y i c%nrn 9. / 1 G}�i� c.b! J �%i �tldrsL✓CYJf}�f /.,t 00. tak,4 N �ALt714 1)' r�% (/7I Ze 13.%CvcS.�✓7Pv eI N. I I �iJG�•uIW� YYl7 ��%C��. G �g IJ"A3 �. 14. i se �J L4A P Lie- gUj,tnA (�'�I 5 �� e�S �J 11q A� 16. U 0 17. ie�✓ �rw �5a lIv�re�Qn� c,� �� ��_ 18. r �c jL-i��7+r1l I ✓t � V I Ji- 1r ,7r1--eNM- toNAL 1 jt�Aq ,. 19 . lr MJ C' t 00 21. Gee l 1, Jen J ¢fit. 23. �' �tf arS Z-zL/ 24.1l�U%%�il. Q�Y�t l,�n�GZ /l ��F?( jY%'`J �'s?S�iICiLl� l��• 1`� )� �,C? 25. 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the • intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: i 2. 3 . ��/V{ �I 4 g��� % P� �. tl !.h odd 6PK�,� 2D U A wti ail//ice fa�� 0-1 e- uj 7. GtGo/ J7r/cr 8. d`rJ 1 �`t i�4 9. oM QJI r��✓t51-� Je ii n' 4 c" Tacks —cm-, f DATE: 7Zr — q Z i - ZY`-yt %./&Zv- la Jo2�/9r i rz zq1_ r, v 00. n ►ti�w � wLG� �o �l yl S o fl 4fi `Lu�Ir K , -Tx l z-ZOL 11. - J N , �i2 (4Vl!!5Og- 12. i'1�1N /l l � �-,, ��f uta.,.�✓ FJO Rd f3.i3 n/. 13. 14. M (Z1�Flo r"es 9)0\( f�ev &9& le) 11 AY19a � l'lG W ��Dvl�. n�Pt) �►ca'� i/' l /f�?,6�'7 Gu •Y}i�,n r ��n U1G vcuG� S c� 18. 19. to, tL V\L- lool(" . 21SCeol-z-. /6Y/ r"�Gy/�Ke.�Cy /�i�ef -L• ­ 4 22.� �cca`�Oc17�tE�2C'�r Y[�r�tG�av ,t 2 24. RFCF'!,'F:n JAIM 1 9 IM 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: 1 . —J/tff %M L-` (%k /Z; 9 -i 2. f�C� Id-3 0 3. OC,1/- 4. Pz"/ 7. ' D O,19 lLr bf JV �?O/ f 14-nf J— , 8. JOI-Of ?OC ,��� �r�a.� ��. d'N�( i2 /,��Tl �. 9. (c_rna A— pLario. , IYlcp��G���� 21�Z �• Pt roIN 12. � �}� � ff�-"`r�.t�' .(,� L( 13. �h`JYJI� 1��' J�- b[� � L lgy5'D 14. ��'1if10 %72 c C��+rK�� ( l t l /� l�T ��r d/tqP ��77g 15. l /i �i N. l�S 1 �� 16..ch l'e) m 1 fiz 5i 9z_ 17. 18. ,it, P ,� IFQ' c(O' ett) 19. 9,3 WI-1 t�= J,./^ f.� 22. �r �. �USCr vl StJhV1Sh7Y\, �I Co�f //d�2c�`tC�e�V�ii, �11�� 23. if, A I f�C y it �iS tv, -zioa- 25 . '..QaA We the undersigned petition the+,Towns of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the.International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an.important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. S GNATURE: NA ADDRESS:0 DATE: 2. ��k �c D rR)k lg ilk 3. I�•AL i 'liU e✓+�tQ c� 4v��� v��° �A -2— Zl 4 rCrfC(�ea-��"ttf� 5. o _ k), bass Vhj�j 7. ii��,,� � P 2 $�i �r°�s+o aG,�ALepl') VtjtL t22 8. ��Q fox 9. ct,,--"' P `'iv7 s�-f"l Ltv<<. i.JOnrSS OK �J �/ r V !/7��",, /�_Z 12-1 0. C/ Cam✓ C7 A 12• 13. �, �33% r,t'��P�9s. t� Cp,.c°. �%%1G �t�` •yam 15."/J rf ��� fr¢tL 16. t lei JF / Ga J `�9�k` �'� V tj , zz -Z� - `12a 17. 0. 21. b ? m % �aJr�3 22. �S n � J n , ��I c �a�r�4sr� D� �f�z �Q r n q1C 23. r Ci.at2�i /kJ�lytl� 45- (A P.44>,'' C .sad. �jgj .>.(lft(�� 1Zf'�3 24. 2 5. j I 11� �(Gf �(-.I�h� G' i`-�7,i ��$��..�n n1Tk- i-�-t �,j�(1 ► r J I p� RECEIVED JAN 9 1993' • 0 Qetvrti ,tG4 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH 183 Gore Creek Dr. VAI L, CO 81657 (303) 476-4660 0 C� 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the • intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME:f ADDRESS: DATE: lis 2. �c1z.c_ Q� �%�� i C. �l C r " } I ► l 3. ;-,III -57, 1-w elz ",40P J064) tlzas4u <-l0M ter } �-'�. ��0.✓nt� - S } w E !'��l',I-Z'C''�j3'5. y P1. "Cca o . 9,4 *3- 1 6. ///ji Aei'/ ✓`s7 /i�4/ 37y� ✓�! �� !�/�'��j red /r2 /�3 7. Z&tJU 0, 9. (� y rl�/2 Fla N ,=rbNro2� var 12 . -b� n N lA in �(h, i � � l .nhr Y 6 L �. 1 �i [�-G, 13. 13e-a -((-Iz Leri 1 D 4-3 'C(ea,--J am6 G{}--c:le ,�Ja(-� "tip 14.�.�Iz1`l%e�t1�}SQi1� 36a1olt��X3rrl ()r 5LILnrisf .. a• 16. SX/L•( <u S� 5S'�/ lae4`, 17 P � �1 18'. LM Ov j.()a �_�yn_� Gv-llcrtO 4 A i'a x b u ( 61 r 114l iz. 19.�1 ll�/a i��I _ (�szoc rper}t C"-- �o� 69� S�Jvi�Ce (C � �z Va ¢- `�-110Y 21. Cr a f �` 'moAP,t Y1 p1";1 22. A \\ 4 u/YCd"',� ()4-� r� Ir . We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SI NATURE: 1. 2. �6rn/��% 43.5. . 6. 7. J-Le� 8. <<� 9. NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: DATE: iN .ddA-/GY,9 E0w� fir_ ?0, I3 � ( 0" /Jis-, QCd 441& ,� PCMVeb JAN 1 9 r . i We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNMURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: 2. 3. 4 ( rt/�C/O ��oxrA 3//78 ce�o Zuod� ��/ �fBll y83a�t-1;P 13 kA vn6� �y 8 . n t�- ► z :� 3 � S 'TY, 5 9. j(q 12. �.. S 3 .as �.� Su t «�� Pv �2.2o"?r a r, 1 I /� J 13 . ' M �C C : Tbwsk r� 4C C � CA L&(rA<, l . i ! 14. 1 � (),l [1Wuv�� kK)-J� Wl mrp— (� Q� SAei r9d pe 4-1 �A 719- d .1'7 l 3 kq 16t t Z. —T&Ar"l IfO E.Awr.d.44� 2�- , lt-4� rl 3 17. 18. lC�ie� ysv �— y $7 . /t 1`t c% /li/l Pf0 7 J t3 19. � iE 9/3.Paa�a�yrxPi(�#,�s. �� � •�/GS7 /// /,�, 23. 24. 25. RECEIVEED JA, 1 9 19,93 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGN VRE: �, _ NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: /y e- !,//C�q�/ /•lc�N� k]oA' 3�� . Vag 1 ���J '�e�T c 2Care Ar Ila,,6 / 3. R;e- G f,2.vid San .30?f 4.d ,v `Q Oe-Lo.eC5 £ 1ht&:vrY Ae, AoxS�,�f s . e-�er' -5Ar k -736 Tr n Art, A oc�e�r A) *r l-,,l�Y-- 5�3 // wd Sah 6•Ca� b� p Gr 'br. (.,Onyt 'o IV 7.1A1�1na.,�H�3r S�Qdu� Gil y am•_ ,�-._ t S7,7n Kr -.Sm Za,A ?A J Ain vt A i- 9 .ham ,,,. r e'1Jr PrtftJ M i - 1 0o. r F—u ICEeA c tLr CO 11 61 f �f(f - 1 Z -�-V -71Fz4 �e�,�� a�rSwzr s� r—r� t3 OAro ( �.� ,-, r.� 1►� Yd 1�3 U�;l �)^� j J— 1s. 16.- 17. 18. 19. 1. 22. 23. 24. 25. RECF1vr-_r a: 1 9 19,m . , 1 0 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: i. 2. 3. 4. 5. 10 0 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. S TURE: N ADDRESS: DATE: 37 `'Le/D 3. 4. /lean 1 �/ �m Z%•%� �i: % ,�% 9. 00 11. J l-t 2+:Z,- c�ia�2,az79 goc 3 (n eQ C1 ITS i v i �s 3 13. j YUi�1�c� c,r 4�FV F-:h 14. 15.. y"l 6� �lU� v �L);-, �� 3 � C}_ l �� �q3 � f 17. 18 19. 0. 1. 22. 23. 24. 25. RECCiti!EQ AN i 9 f99� AAust b,1 within 30 days 60 p 'u, have sales r.a"Pt in at l 9� We the undersigned petition 'the.Fiauit�aofar Vafil t d-keep the small bridge located adjacent to the international Bridge in ! .Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: - 2 / 3. 4. n 6. G'Vldl� 7. 8. 0. NAME: TRESS: 62 3 ,u¢ i 41 i `�;„An ?,IIJ, >� APB - as� . 06U � ,� Y� [fDATE: `z- �1iZ,fZ5��7 f 26 9� 1z zL�, - qZ- 20 IZ— r7 o2G — �Z eA 13. 14 C c[ f �ScJ /aA?i /G 15. 36v �rt�,✓ fC� c, Vp t L Cc� !' IZ8 (5'~ JC-L--2-- rd6 SFr64M�t ak ) ?-/A '°I '+-- 17. 1�71X., 18. /4inY� 7Q k) of _Cr: l� c� /Oz �q — % /�2 19. i'Y1PaP� ��eN� �z:�- -^[( lV 21. 22 V Z t z.13! /42 12- 9, 0 RECEIVED 9 16""") V-' , INDIAN PAINTBRUSH 183 Gore Creek Dr. VAIL, CO 81667 (803) 476-4660 We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in .Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SI NATURE: NAME: J ADDRESS: DATE: /� 2. N z 3. p of l i��r % P�c�Rm,c�fl�.i ?,. g16s� 12) -, 1 q)L 4. 9l )L�. l �t�_sY1, ��3� Enk�I8� non�0 %Iwb �a/�i/9.2- 5. r- 7. 8. O �y1n Cp v AI, P oo*. v� 11.E �� ��V -- �c 6�r_ /�_�(1�r a �f R �� � CO 12. 13. Csw (©Q L L�62 v� U� �'Gc UaJ C'b, 14 _1'�_ 15. j / !// G �' �e fl S !%7j ���c�� rGi .iMJ2� ��17 1'2 16.`i>r�vru� JJaMr�r evy lJ/ }��o���rr� /uPSOI�i��s%�o'l�S� J� IJI�J p 17. 19. �� � � l C 7 `, . e �nrA�v�. r �� c F��roll �u l/A(C 21. 22. 23. �,� ��, �g �[ q-z S Uf zca IV Z Yl� 24. d tWl Pa LV)k-%J VAI L /Z/zu f 0z We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the • intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: �/ 6, G_°�IDrU S 2. _ 17, P,4442 6t I 3. i/lM(AlDavll�Rce1 �C�`�7 4. G.�,.. (i �11C11�(k� �t�i'S�i?SCs� 20 L►orJ51-}6',4J NU+t - i 17 1 1 ) 5f F ; r J p 5. � P . )�C G'IY� �It"1 ��6�C(��7�vV�o1-F �At' �Z �_ 11 z l , 6. 7. 8. 9. �� r #r _ I �O�v� � . �V'�y %dam %J li�/1-•ti`r�y � J lc� �o. � �FS� Jai. �}� Gtrr�'�/l � I [ �> � Cha�✓1��- ct�4�- Y 0 12. ! �ra7Zl/b/1 13. �1l Sn1V f l(! �11C�i Q(l� -2� 14 . rn" � c�loiZCil } / �D i (11 i2 � c � �� 6N yak nn -ry 4Q 11 15 . �iL2 /. ,� `1// f�OG 6? .S LI��, a�Ci t .3e,�+'p� w/4 /./%/F16. i°(c(( n.� 9cYltn / S ArI�G� �eu�i ^ c> fK 17. fllAy 18. 19./cam?off OA 21.�722 a6t . /�r� '7 93 22. I'1h na 6J' ,Z 1 :�' 9�d uY , R p ylz, ` /ov! 9 23. . �! r ad x,� r ��i� Ct� S (- S iC�. �!GA. .- /. !kh/ 0 We the undersigned petition small bridge located adjacent t .Vail Village. The smaller bridge intimacy of this creekside area 40 the Town of Vail to keep the o the International Bridge in is an important part of the of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: 2 = �j� ►Y„ sl'A 3. PO a93-C 4. c a� ADDRESS: DATE: Z)� C'v j��ai j4L 5. - J-� V �X 412- O 9el/' 6. 001, i 7. 10. r r /9PY0 12. (Vll,( Uni/i'a 11 13.1 14. 1llr.Ln me SS, n��r�.(��r. rIt 2--Z-- + E (n �V E r ��jV(.�.0 l r I �11 , 16. 17. ,�`''`"), Cvyn/.J � rv�^5cy (_u;� AC,,) 18. 2,003 i� 3 19. E)C A C..0 uc� 2v�i'� era"G'/l M E x I CG J fatLl CL P,-., 7v RFCFAM-11 J N' 1 9 1993 0 0 We the undersigned petition the 'Tow .&f Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in .Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of°the`Village core. SIGNATURE:gn/� y NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: MAS ' vN -7D(o`'S S _ L oSc 1l (.� m/z-Di q Z 2. ( t I)Chbe-K Kei/— Zc7(v3 S,LOgUn 7 JP"� tizjz�l�v 3. /C�i u � �r1 _ c� S L � 6V-1b 'J1, !%i� .,10 I��- 0h lC�� //.� %G 12Z2� / Z 4. J A/ / i L� � N J f k�� Ua , U1 � P- 5. 8. V �D � �fAnrry t f s 3a�s l3r�f4 �LI �C r ��c��y1 13 . A- 14. rat l�tk� �hC< n rz'i P � h/tea I� f� �tl.in� �ll� !L 15. 1 , tip_1�hv� 16. 1 46 C44�;7303q 19. / ��1 a�l< rrI A'� n/�(1 JJ �rD 2�� 1 U l�llusvGda-y -o la/a z-)- K I P V P�C�r �1 AV ay I ' 1-�21 . �✓U��,-� � Ca--N.r--Q� Q-� 22. 1�I D7/i. i` 1 As1 t� � u vs�/ (6 3-. (b0N 4 4 PP J 25` RE—'CEIVEJAN 1 9 1993 INDI'AN PAINTBRUSH 183 Core Creek Dr. VAIL, CO 81657 (303) 476-4660 • D We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SIGNATURE: NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: 2.,3P, (�/�'//J ® / 3•G _ _ ^e E�b1.S /.3p 4e6�dtrS �� I2`S/^� , 5. 7. 9. yvw� Lini5C foreS 12 ✓'� r, ' 13. Z 13c�c k-1 ells iu1� Qorar�u l rrsf �ru,r�o ; I:v 15. �' � l�-, rrr� � � •�. I/Yi %}7ns�.e� r �{ullf7Ztr�F I%(i��, `f—RucS%„ % /2 2 r 1$.Q t 9' = l &i4 Z nl160 ,�M-rg� c �lr�x r�F �� z r 9z r 0 .t- Te 0"(1 e. re f v1 21.NJA E-4 22. vi In I_`P�irtI 1�% IZ lcl tE i �. �CuvA 'Q/ 23. �f l� IK"�,A,�� 24.�%�i�� 25.12L- ,. PFCEWPO ,►AN 1 9 p�93 i 0 &mallWee .he undersi n_ed_peti_ti.Qax__the._Tawxn-wof-=_ a .-,tc�-- ee t Sj edge located p,dZac_n to the Internationa Bride � Va 1 aT qe The smatter bridge is an 'important part--o ttie. int . aci� s r�ekside area of the Village core.. �.. Y ATURE• NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: M-7 T)�, (.2� 3. 4. ,1e �lc�,,f� �; vnee } �e 1 D`f t 12- . n s. �AfLi.�s C;,�� (.�sLGuS 9�n n� �tf� I�U��Q.�� IJP-r'`,N,uM,r.7 1,2 6,^ 7. �a I�t �' a Nm �+1 �Naf15K-$u�tTa� 41 -- _ to 9. 12. r"Y ►15�J �r le V5 H •`n)l—`1tArP; V.11 �/�x�7?i7 `! r +� !P 13. 14. T. ��uiSf Vd`l, C-a 1�IIo57 ,S T,� h n S tin VOLi I'CI) Sal to ri'� 16.��. 17. u� �.cc.eC iovo P - p t 18. 19. 21. 22. 9io i1L�e �ceu ? TiesIkl ,a "2 23. A..fO 24. 25. 9,,Z. IDCL% Vt, PeCeI (E0 JAM 10 MA We the undersigned petition the Town of Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent to the International Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge is an important part of the intimacy of this creekside area of the Village core. SI AT NAME: ADDRESS: DATE: v 2 f t> r'3 rzo— 45w ivu- t Yrr 11G. L r i ! L (l 4 i Z 3. 5. - ma i 1 5-) kakrhur-h C,V VV� 6. leaf /S✓ % 11-,s U2�✓ �o��1j � �,C/ �z `/i ,r� � era q s. �hii� (ems (,O�-. Lai 6�hoyiq P( Vao . CO !Z-iq-qZ_, 12. c^13 nrn� Dqs =�: P ga oa., 1� P ngWam� �_. H4n�r�r�d 4J}l atl=51 sz 13. rig /a /)!0✓//!i'7i17f�i/t c�%doM 14. �' �Lc��r�11 fail � //���. // �� � e sf. �� ! a 1/-1q k 15. ��lt� AU(SfRr �i �ICaw i �1iL�d GR2wrrS�lf�vL f411,Fl fZ 16. _ f �� �' jvi �`PIat�4ce) Vn, 110CpP TYih 17. /. Y l�r�e�11PW-P(Je r G.n C C) t I l2 �1-' ! 1Z 18. . r AO Lev I 41 1)ax.3G9 dJftee P-L 21 22. 23. - 6.012 L ydem l(-1 Ili !nOrN f2d V6I) 24.✓ ��<96- 2 t/�1 �(C} MZ 5i�1-f, n�b/�n� ni��rIt0 25. -a ev��_i- �i CtL (�r� lit; �f��i�r ��lu �cvut�vtcv�lvvr IP'ItRr--n INDIAN PANT BRUSH 183 Gore Creek Dr. VAIL,CO 81657 (303) 476-4660 • 0 0 9 We the undersigned petit ion.,!;WtTQwnax,?f Vail to keep the small bridge located adjacent, `to',,*he,.;fnter`national Bridge in Vail Village. The smaller bridge.'is an;important part of the intimacy of this creekside area .q the;V111age core. SIGNATURES: NAME: I ADDRESS: f� DATE: �6A,c �`� f/w42. J � //- 3. �-i� �vv)/ - 4. C-A 6. L / 9. It/Cl�n`,1�s�v� 3�1 ? f7��i�awer i�",) 12 p lSf ,� c _ _ t t iXPow c �, 1 9LqPz 14 -fie op-`/2�y�� 15 . s� JC �� Z 16. ��t►, ' v�l ��i.�•r � ��_ ,�R�C�e�V is G� , ��, � �t to lG�r96 18. IUik� IU[or�ts8-, to4�.I�'Is F/z�r icrce �5.f'��/� 19. P Goa\ 6fC,—, /$. /(�vur c� 1(09 nj ti'((C TFa✓ � Jtwcre t�i�1 J 21 •j j' 1� cEtY15vN %9/! Z% 22. 23. 24. iA 1.� t er ( IC �C l 6- l�j�`f t wx �" 1� & lovv7 ` 25. W/ RECEIVED JAN 1 9 194 INDIAN PAINT BRUSH 183 Gore Creek Dr. VAIL, CO 81657 (303) 476-4660 r1 • • 0 January 19, 1993 46 Vail Town Council Municipal Building 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Sirs: Unfortunately I am unable to attend tonight's meeting to voice my opinion regarding the possible removal of the small diagonal bridge crossing Gore Creek in Vail Village. I would like to go on record as being strongly opposed to its removal. I've lived in Vail for 23 years, and the reasons that partially compelled me to move here and stay on for so long include the "original" appearance of the village which is rapidly changing. The new bridge is great - a beautiful piece of construction. However, when crossing by foot, one is still enveloped by vehicle noises and fumes. The diagonal bridge is something of a short cut, unencumbered by those immediate noises and fumes and is also a good way to view the summertime Gore Creek activities. Where is the financial sense in its removal? If it needs to be fixed, fix it in the most economical manner possible. But let's not remove one of the fun, traditional avenues of the village that so many of us love. Thank you. Mos jsincer , 4/�/hi.v u �-S die ia✓I-i Elizabeth Wilt, Manager VAIL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING Y19/93 Tc fvE �rC, G��ttii✓ rft�Y flee- 41VIZovf-0 . op