Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-10-18 Town Council Minutes0 E Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 18, 2005 6:00 P.M. Vail Town Council Chambers Council Members Present: Rod Slifer, Mayor* Dick Cleveland, Mayor Pro -Tern Diana Donovan Kim Ruotolo* Farrow Hitt Greg Moffet* Kent Logan Staff Members Present: Stan Zemler, Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer, Asst. Town Manager Matt Mire, Town Attorney *Ruotolo arrived at approximately, 6:15 p.m. Moffet arrived at approximately, 6:34 p.m. Slifer arrived at approximately, 6:35 p.m.. Mayor Pro-Tem Dick Cleveland called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. The first item on the agenda was Citizen Input. Kaye Ferry, Executive Director of the Vail Chamber & Business Association (VCBA) announced a Vail Town Council candidates forum would be held at 6 p.m., 10.19.2005 at Donovan Pavilion. Mery Lapin, Conference Center Oversight Committee member, stated he was not willing to support the conference center. He outlined four primary concerns: 1. Price inflation of the project. 2. Arch itect/construction contractor ability to meet budget. 3. Little confidence with projections related to income and revenue. 4. Difficulty with the architecture of the project. Lapin went on to say, We are building a very expensive project at the wrong time ... I think the project will have monetary shortfalls from day one ... Without rooms (public accommodation units) it controls, the conference center will look less attractive to event planners ... 85% of potential conferences are covered by existing facilities... Do we really want to have conferences consisting of 2,000 to 3,000 people ... I don't find the present architecture of the project attractive, and honestly find it to be an eyesore." Representing Citizens for Choice in Government, Peter Runyon provided an information presentation regarding Eagle County election measure 1A. Runyon suggested a county home rule type of government provided many advantages over the current three commissioner form of government. Runyon reported three significant impacts: 1. Expand to five county commissioners. 2. Non -partisan elections. 3. Better geographic representation. He then outlined the four steps to Home Rule implementation: 1. Vote yes to authorize a home rule charter committee. 2. Vote for candidates to serve on the committee. 3. Elected committee then meets during a 240 day period to draft a charter. 4. Charter is voted on by all electors in Eagle County. Zemler clarified the commission was not locked into expanding the commission to five (any number deemed appropriate by the voters could be decided). See Resolution No. 18. The second item on the agenda was a review and recommendation of the Parking Task Force for 2005-2006 season. Public Works Director Greg Hall reviewed parking recommendations of the Parking Task Force and asked Council to approve parking policies for 2005-06. Council established the Parking Task Force to provide direction regarding parking operation policies for each year. The three areas in which the Task Force believed attention was warranted included the need to adjust the inequities of the shopper parking with the rates within the structure, address the price of the value passes to reflect the price increases from years past, and to address the increased demand of the construction workforce this season. The Parking Task Force recommended the following changes to the parking policies for the 2005-2006 season. All rates would remain consistent with the 2004-05 winter season with the exception of the following: 1. Provide two options for the shopper spaces ➢ 0-2 hours for the $3 rate; or ➢ 0-3 hours for $5 rate 2. Raise the price of the value pass which has remained constant for the last five years ➢ Vail Status from $5 to $6 non peak and from $10 to $12 peak ➢ Eagle County Status from $6 to $7 non peak and from $12 to $14 peak In recognition of increased demand during the week due to the construction workforce, it was recommended the town provide a construction company pass option. This pass would be allowed in LionsHead only, Monday to Thursday, when LionsHead typically has 300-400 available spaces. The pass would be restricted during the peak period of the holidays, Dec. 26 to Jan. 5. Sales of the pass would be limited to construction companies to be used by employees and subcontractors. Task Force member Cleveland stated the construction pass was a way to better utilize town facilities and maximize parking structure revenue. The construction pass would be $400 for the season. R.A. Nelson construction was reported to be currently preparing to operate shuttle buses for its employees from a lot in Minturn with Vail Resorts Development Company considering a similar option. Ruotolo expressed concern construction workers were receiving z preferential treatment with the $400 parking pass. Representing the VCBA, Kaye Ferry supported the recommendations. Moffet moved with Ruotolo seconding a motion to approve. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Slifer thanked Cleveland and Hitt for spending their time on the Task Force. The third item on the agenda was the first reading of Ordinance No. 24, Series of 2005, an ordinance deleting Title 4, Chapter 4, Articles A and B, Vail Town Code as they relate to time share disclosure and registration requirements; amending Title 12, Zoning Regulations, to clarify the time share regulations. On September 12, 2005, the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) held a public hearing on the proposed amendments. Upon review of the 'amendments, the PEC voted 7-0-0 to forward a recommendation of approval of the request to the Vail Town Council. Moffet moved with Cleveland seconding a motion to approve. Mire answered a question brought forth by Donovan regarding the ordinance stating what fractional ownership is not. Mire clarified by attempting to state in town code, "what something is not would require listing `everything' fractional ownership is not." Hitt verified, "When you buy into a fractional fee club, you are buying into a club, not a titled property." Fractional fee clubs and fractional ownership are different uses. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The fourth item on the agenda was the second reading of Ordinance No. 22, Series 2005, an ordinance to adopt the 2006 Budget. Finance Director Judy Camp reported the budget proposal is the result of discussions throughout the summer and reflects the guidelines and philosophies developed by this council and previous councils. Revenue is budgeted conservatively. The Fund Balance in the General Fund remains above 35% of revenue during the time of redevelopment (47% in 2006). This proposal allocates 60% of the town's 4% general sales tax revenue to the General Fund and 40% to the Capital Projects Fund. Any allocation of less than 50% to the Capital Projects Fund requires a super majority vote. Moffet commended the Finance Department and the Town Manager for their hard work on the budget. Commenting on an item in the Capital Projects Budget for $965,000 for East Meadow Drive streetscape, he stated heating East Meadow Drive was a substantial increase in operating costs, which were previously estimated at $30,000 to $40,000 and would now be higher. He also stated concern about greenhouse gas effect because of snowmelt. Due to those concerns, Moffet said he would vote against the budget. Hitt asked to include funding for a coupon offering free parking on Wednesdays in the Vail Loves You Coupon book. He explained the books had not been mailed out last year limiting adequate and appropriate distribution. Vail Chamber and Business Association (VCBA) Executive Director Kaye Ferry explained the book would be mailed out by the book publisher this year. In 2004, $37,000 worth of parking coupons included in the Vail Coupon books was redeemed. Brandmeyer clarified there were to be five black out dates and the coupon would include an expiration date this year. Moffet questioned why the employee housing buy -down program funding was not included in the 2006 Capital Projects Budget. Zemler stated the program has not been used in prior years and the amount budgeted for 2006 would be rolled over. Since $10,000 had been spent for the Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program in 2005, the amount to be rolled over was $190,000, which included $100,000 rolled from the 2004 budget and $90,000 from 2005. Moffet and Ruotolo stated the purpose of rolling the funds over in addition to new funding each year is to accumulate funds to purchase different types of housing inventory. Hitt asked if there was any tax benefit for free market owners to sell their house into a buy down program. Forrest stated only open space land contributions offered tax benefits to a seller. Council directed staff to • include $100,000 in the 2006 Capital Projects Budget for the Buy -Down Program. Brandmeyer added parking had been requested from Battle Mountain High School Hockey for two days. Council would not support the request if it occurred on the Martin Luther King Holiday. In response to a question concerning use of the business license fee, Camp clarified the fees go into the Vail Marketing Fund and, per ordinance, are used for marketing only. In 2005 and 2006, funds available from business license fees would be disbursed through the Commission on Special Events (CSE). In previous years, other organizations were given funds from business license fees to provide marketing and special events. Council requested the Vail Marketing Fund be renamed to avoid confusion and Mire clarified there was no statutory obligation regarding the name, only the use of the fund. Moffet stated he wanted to eliminate a sense of entitlement to program recipients of the business license fees. Ruotolo moved for adoption of the budget with Logan seconding. The motion passed 6-1, with Moffet opposed because of the East Meadow Drive streetscape discussed above. Zemler publicly commended Finance Director Judy Camp and Budget Analyst Gina Davis for their exhaustive and meticulous work on the budget. He also thanked Brandmeyer for her efforts with the budget. The fifth item on the agenda was the second Reading of Ordinance No. 23, Series 2005, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Title 6, Chapter 3, Article I of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to restraining order violations. Since the Town of Vail's adoption and codification of its restraining order legislation in 2004, several of the Colorado Revised Statutes referenced and cited in the Town Code relating to restraining orders have been repealed by the Colorado General Assembly. As such, the restraining order prohibition as set forth in the Vail Town Code prohibition has been re -written to delete the repealed statutes. Cleveland moved with Moffet seconding a motion to approve. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The sixth item on the agenda was Resolution No. 11, Series 2005, a resolution supporting Referenda C and D, The Colorado Economic Recovery Plan, The Council is authorized, pursuant to C.R.S. § 1-45-117(1)(b)(III)(A) to pass a resolution taking a position of advocacy on a referred measure. Resolution No. 11 was such a resolution for consideration. Zemler stated revenues from Referendum D would allow bonding to occur for a significant amount of transportation projects. On 1-70 near Vail Pass there would be an eastbound climbing lane project valued at $7,000,000 and 1-70 at Dowd Junction would possibly realize $13,000,000 in renovations. He qualified it was difficult to immediately assess specific benefits potentially brought about by Referendum C. Representing the Vail Village Homeowners Association, Jim Lamont, asked why Council would not pass a resolution whether supporting/or not supporting the proposed Vail Conference Center. He then stated East Vail residents were concerned about the possible expansion (climbing lanes) of 1-70 near Vail Pass. Moffet stated without C or D there would be no future transportation dollars available for mitigating anything (noise) on 1-70. Bill Jewitt reiterated Lamont's comments regarding taking a stance on support for the conference center. Paul Rondeau stated he believed the operation of the conference center was within control of the town and Council should take a stance on it. Moffet moved to approve the resolution with Slifer seconding. Donovan then asked Council to take a stance on the conference center. Ruotolo, Logan and Donovan stated they did not believe it was appropriate for the Council to take a position on Referendums C and D. The resolution failed 2-5, with Slifer and Moffet voting in the affirmative. The seventh item on the agenda was Resolution No. 18, Support for Referendum la, the Home Rule Charter Commission. The Council is authorized, pursuant to C.R.S. § 1- MM611 i • 11 45-117(1)(b)(III)(A) to pass a resolution taking a position of advocacy on a referred measure. Logan moved to approved with Donovan seconding. The motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Slifer was not present for the vote. The eighth item on the agenda was Resolution #19, Series 2005, authorizes the Town Manager to enter another five year contract with the Colorado Department of Transportation at a renegotiated amount. Public Works Director Greg Hall reported the town entered into a contract with the Colorado Department of Transportation on October 24, 2000, and took over maintenance services on the Frontage Roads between MM 172.2 to MM 180.3. The contract was a five year contract and was to expire on October 24, 2005. Moffet moved with Ruotolo seconding a motion to approve. Slifer clarified it was the renewal of a five-year contract. Cleveland verified the contract made "economic sense" and allowed the town to provide enhanced levels of service. Hitt stated the level of service provided by the town is exemplary as compared to the snow removal provided by the state. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Donovan made a motion to direct staff to draft a resolution opposing the conference center referendum. Hitt seconded the motion. The motion failed 3-4 with Donovan, Cleveland, Hitt voting in the affirmative. Moffet moved to direct staff to draft a resolution in support of the conference center referendum. Logan seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-3 with Donovan, Cleveland and Hitt opposed. The ninth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report. There was nothing to report. The tenth item on the agenda was Adjournment. Ruotolo moved with Moffet seconding a motion to adjourn at approximately 7:58 p.m. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0. ATTEST: Lorelei or aldson, Town Clerk Minutes provided by Corey Swisher. Rodney E. Slifer, Mayor �0 N�OF SEAL �a�Ofif►��