HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-02-07 Town Council MinutesVail Town Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
6:00 P.M.
Vail Town Council Chambers
The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by
Mayor Andrew P. Daly.
Members present: Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
Kerry Donovan
Kevin Foley
Ludwig Kurz
Greg Moffet
Margaret Rogers
Susie Tjossem
Staff members: Stan Zemler, Town Manager
Matt Mire, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager
The first item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2012, an ordinance approving a
zone district boundary amendment, pursuant to Section 12-3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code,
for a rezoning from Ski Base Recreation District to Ski Base Recreation 2 District, located at 598
Vail Valley Drive/part of Tract B, Vail Village Filing 7, and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Daly stated this agenda item was moved up to the beginning of the meeting as it has a lot of
community interest and the applicant sent a letter requesting this item be tabled to the February
21, 2012, public hearing. Daly said since the Republican Caucus was also being held this
evening, he moved the item up from being heard eighth on the agenda to the first item to be
heard so people could get to their meeting.
Moffet made a motion to table first reading of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 2012, to the February
21, 2012, public hearing and the motion was seconded by Tjossem. A vote was taken and the
motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The second item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Dominic Mauriello stated he was
representing three clients: Timberline/Roost Lodge, the Cascade Residences and Strata Vail
project. His clients are asking for an item to be added to a future Council meeting to consider a
request to extend deadlines for their approved projects as the deadlines to build are expiring.
Rogers asked when the expirations for the projects were occurring. Mauriello stated some of
them begin to expire five months from now. Mauriello said the clients would like to request
extensions from three to six years. Daly said staff will add it to a future agenda.
The third item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda. The consent agenda items included
the following:
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 1
1) Resolution No. 8, 2012; Subway Agreement - Matt Mire
2) Resolution No. 9, 2012; Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) - Bald Mountain Berm/Eagle
River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD);
3) Resolution No. 10, 2012; IGA - Underground Electric/ERWSD;
4) Resolution No. 11, 2012 IGA Amendment - Matterhorn Bridge Replacement/Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT); and
5) Employee Housing Unit (EHU) Exchange Approval - Nina Timm. Donovan wants a summary
report to be attached under consent agendas. Kim Newbury, a representative of the Vail Local
Housing Authority (VLHA) said the VLHA discussed the need to change the current policy on
bundling exchanges and that the ordinance doesn't currently allow.
Moffet made a motion to remove the Employee Housing Unit Exchange (Item #5) from the
consent agenda and Donovan seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously, 7-0.
Moffet made a motion to approve the consent agenda, Resolution Nos. 8, 9, 10 and 11, Series
of 2012, and the motion was seconded by Donovan. Foley said he would be voting against
approving the consent agenda due to Resolution No. 8, the Subway agreement because the
town was paying too much. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-1. Foley opposed.
Further discussion ensued on the EHU exchange. Nina Timm, Vail Housing Coordinator,
explained the exchange and why the applicants wanted to bundle the exchanges. She said
there are two different exchanges. She said the exchange on 252 West Meadow Drive is totally
separate.
Tjossem made a motion to approve the 252 West Meadow Drive EHU exchange and the motion
was seconded by Moffet. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 7-0.
Timm explained the bundling was done to exchange the non -or -under -performing EHU's and to
provide more achievable, performing EHU's. Further discussion ensued as to the square
footage exchange and town policies regarding this topic.
Moffet made a motion to table the portion of the item regarding bundling of EHU's and the
motion was seconded by Foley.
Timm asked that the EHU bundling be tabled to the next meeting on February 21, 2012.
Rogers said if a delay is causing harm to the applicants she doesn't want to delay the vote.
Dominic Mauriello, representing the applicants, said it would create a burden as some of the
owners have set other things in motion, i.e.; closings that will be impacted if this item is tabled.
He requested the Council move forward with the vote. He said the bundling concept works as
the town will get more square footage for exchanges than is currently required.
A vote was taken and the motion was tabled, 5-2, Tjossem and Rogers opposed.
The fourth item on the agenda was Proclamation No. 2, Series of 2012, "One Book, One
Valley."
Daly read the proclamation into the record.
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 2
Lori Barnes, Town Librarian, stated this was a valley -wide reading program initiative called One
Book, One Valley which was sponsored and supported by the towns of Vail, Avon, Minturn and
Eagle. This will encourage literacy and the shared enjoyment of reading throughout Eagle
County. She said the author of "Doc" will be coming to Eagle County in March.
Daly thanked Barnes and said she worked with all the Eagle County libraries to get this project
off the ground.
Moffet made a motion to approve Proclamation No. 2, 2012, and the motion was seconded by
Rogers. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 7-0.
The fifth item on the agenda was the Town Manager's Report
Stan Zemler, Town Manager, reviewed the current status of the Vail Transportation Center
(VTC) and the Shuttle/Taxi/Limousine Services. Council had asked staff to take a look at the
use of the limousine (limos) and shuttle/taxi services at the VTC. He said he took an objective
look at this issue and did a site visit to the VTC. He said limos play an important role in our
transportation services to guests. He said there are thirteen limousine services in Vail that can
be used in lieu of taxicabs. There is a great distinction between the two services. Under the
Public Utility Commission (PUC) rules and regulations, there are distinct differences in the way
each service is licensed and operated. Limos are supposed to be driven by a reservation
system in which someone calls ahead prior to the ride.
He said there has clearly been conflict between the limo drivers and the competition. It is the
town's job to help regulate this particular service. A number of issues have been raised over the
past year. There are temporary parking spots to the east of the VTC and there have been nine
different spaces designated in the evening for limos. He said one of the requests was to allow
for larger limos to be on the top deck in the east area near the information center and they didn't
fit well in the designated spaces. There are two opportunities for limos to go to the north and
east side of the VTC. Since parking is free after three, there is also parking available inside the
gates of the top of the VTC. The town has done a pretty good job finding space for the limo
services. The town doesn't have the land to have more spaces allocated for the larger limos.
Zemler addressed the issue that Levine raised regarding the guests locating the limos. He said
since a reservation has to be made, it's reasonable that the limo company would tell their guests
where to go to find the limos. There is also signage to direct people to the limos as well. Over
the past year, the town has done a lot to try to help this situation. The sign with the limo
companies on it was removed as it didn't have all the information for all the various limo
companies. Zemler stated the sign should not go back up as people make a reservation for
limo services. Limo companies can give their ridership directions on where to get picked up.
Another issue is the conflict between the taxi companies and the limo companies at night. He
asked Council if the town should have staff up there to mediate and use town resources or
charge for utilization of those spaces. He said there is conflict due to differences of opinion on
the rules and regulations between different businesses. The town has done a lot to make this
circumstance work and provide opportunities for buses, taxis and limo services to work in a very
congested location.
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 3
Daly asked if the town has given the guests enough information to easily have a choice on
transportation options from the guest perspective.
Zemler said it's not perfect, but over the past year, the town has done a lot to help alleviate the
issues. He said the conflict timeframe that covers the issue they are talking about is less than
10% of the time and are the hyper periods of time when there are big crowds during the season.
Jonathan Levine, Hummers of Vail limousine owner, said a lot of what Zemler stated was true.
He had handed out material to each Council member laying out his concerns. He said it's his
company that parks in the parking structure "free after three" spaces as the limousines are
oversized and have found ways around the rules that have been laid out by the Police Chief.
He stated the police department has issued three citations to his drivers regarding where the
vehicles were parked by the Information Center. He said he doesn't want to have to train and
educate people on where to get a ride in his limos. He also said he doesn't always have a
reservation for each of his rides. He went through different signs he created that he wanted to
use and scenarios of where to move the taxis so he could pickup guests at the Information
Center.
Mike Cacioppo said it was clear to him that Council or the Police Chief have no desire to solve
this problem. He was happy to see some positive movement on this issue. He said this is a
health, safety and welfare issue.
Daly asked Cacioppo if he had some solutions. Cacioppo said he did. He said some of what
Zemler said was a good start but needs more work. He didn't like the removal of the signs with
the limo telephone numbers on it. He said it was absurd that there was a PUC law that doesn't
allow for someone to pick a limo or a cab when they need transportation services. It was good
that Zemler took the initiative to go out and review the situation. He requested the sign be put
back up with all the limos and taxi numbers on it so guests and locals have a choice of who to
contact. He suggested that space be made available for taxis since limos and vans have a spot
at the Information Center on the VTC.
The sixth item on the agenda was the vacancy appointment to the Vail Local Licensing
Authority (VLLA). There was one qualified applicant, Michael Hannigan, who was interviewed at
the work session earlier in the day. The appointment fills a vacancy left by a member, Cody
Kennedy, who moved out of town and the term of the appointment ends May 31, 2012.
Donovan made a motion to appoint Michael Hannigan to the VLLA and the motion was
seconded by Moffet. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Foley
thanked Cody Kennedy for his service on this board.
The seventh item on the agenda was a Council update and request for comments on the
revised Ford Park Illustrative Plan in preparation for submittal to the Planning and
Environmental Commission (PEC).
Todd Oppenheimer, Public Works Landscape Architect, presented an updated plan for Ford
Park to Council. He is asking for Council's initial comments to the plan. He said this was a two
part approval process. The first part is a Ford Park Management Plan update and then a
concurrent development plan submittal for items that are considered to be funded. They will be
going to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) on February 27, 2012, for
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 4
additional comments from that board. There was a public open house earlier this evening to get
public comments. There was a productive stakeholders meeting earlier in the day with
members from the Vail Valley Foundation (VVF), Vail Recreation District (VRD), Betty Ford
Alpine Gardens (BFAG), Bravo and town staff where the plan was reviewed in detail. The
challenge is to balance the structured uses of the park with the natural aspects of the park,
including the views, open space and Gore Creek. Staff will be back to Council on March 20,
2012, for a more formal request for approval on this project.
Oppenheimer reviewed the power point presentation with Council. He said there was a two day
workshop on Jan 8 and 9 with all stakeholders and members of the public to come to a
consensus of what should be considered in Ford Park: operationally, aesthetically and
functionally, etc.
Daly asked how the new plans tie into the 1997 Ford Park Management Plan. Oppenheimer
said a lot of things they are talking about were part of the 1997 plan and some of the items have
been accomplished (i.e., the route across Manor Vail into the park is now ADA compliant, the
route from Vail Valley Drive from the Nature Center into the park is also ADA compliant and the
sidewalk from the west parking lot is a paved sidewalk and ends at the Vail Transportation
Center.
Daly asked what the inconsistencies are from the 1997 plan. Oppenheimer said the main
inconsistency is the Welcome Center for the Betty Ford Alpine Garden. In 1997, the location for
a garden center was contemplated at the soccer field and since then the BFAG board has
moved away from that idea.
Daly requested the 1997 plans be e-mailed to the Council so they can review them. Moffet
asked the size of the soccer fields. Oppenheimer said they are collegiate lacrosse size fields.
Mike Ortiz, VRD Director, said the two fields are 115 feet x 75 feet, which satisfies any level of
soccer or lacrosse games, except Olympic size.
Jana McKenzie, AECom, said Phase I of the plan is what they want to turn into a development
plan. The main components are the fields, placing emphasis on making a nice, attractive
entrance, and addressing the drop-off area. She said the team wants to resolve those issues
and Betty Ford Way is a key component. The desire was to limit vehicle access to the lower
bench. The circulation spine on the Frontage Road is key and will have a better entry for the
BFAG Welcome Center. There is a separate path to the lower bench and amphitheater and
connects to Betty Ford Way on the lower bench. She reviewed more aspects of the Ford Park
plan with Council. Daly asked about a monument at the entry area. Donovan wants to see a
low profile of the concession stand on the east side of the VRD fields so it doesn't interfere with
the Gore Range views.
Jack Zehren, with Zehren and Associates, reviewed the amphitheater portion of the park. He
said Jim Morter, with Morter Architects, who is the original Amphitheater architect, is on the
design team. He said as the amphitheater has grown over the years, and in the workshop they
discussed how they can make the experience better. They discussed how to transition from
one part of the park to another, improve the lawn seating, the will -call and ticket area
improvements, the east entry area into the amphitheater, an overlook for smaller receptions,
expanded restrooms at the east end and the main entry, architectural improvements to enhance
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 5
the space and how to address the service and delivery area. Zehren went into more detail of
the smaller reception area for functions that don't require the use of the whole amphitheater.
Donovan is concerned they are taking away part of a used public space by moving it into a
private area for the amphitheater. Oppenheimer said the space they are talking about is in the
leased space of the amphitheater already.
Zehren said to alleviate the need for trucks to go down to the lower bench, they are
reconfiguring the area to have a turning space for the service vehicles. He also said they were
working on creating a series of terraces to alleviate the problem of people sliding down the hill.
Donovan said the travel areas on the lawn seating need to be looked at closely as there are so
many people weaving through the crowds and they step on other people's blankets. Zehren said
they are looking at what is the right balance of this issue.
Tjossem asked if more trees were being planted to help with the sound issue between the
amphitheater and the softball fields.
Zehren said the experts said trees don't really help alleviate this problem. They are trying to
balance out the visual aesthetics and the sound issues. Daly asked about the television
screens in the amphitheater. Zehren said the idea is to locate them in the existing structure at a
height for those in the amphitheater. They haven't gotten too much into the details and they will
have to evaluate what works. Additional review of the power point presentation was discussed
including Betty Ford Way, access points, the Ford family tributes, Morales sculpture, lower
bench lawn, restroom relocation, enhancement of the playground, and use of the basketball
court as a bike corral during major bike events, etc.
Foley asked about the grading on the east side down to the amphitheater. Zehren said their
goal is to be 7%. Widening the path to accommodate the service vehicles and turnaround will
also be recommended.
Donovan said they need to be cognizant that building a large structure will take away from the
Nature Center experience. Rogers asked about the deletion of ADA parking on the lower bench
and how moving ADA guests down to the lower bench would be accomplished.
Oppenheimer said this is part of future operational items to review that came out of the
workshop. He said currently there are a lot of vehicles that go down into the lower bench.
Some are accessing the ADA parking, dropping things off at the garden gift shop or the
amphitheater. He said there are a lot of people who have the combination of the gate to get
down to the lower bench. The idea to move the ADA spaces was a derivative of what the
amphitheater is already doing. They use a golf cart system instead of using the vehicle access
to the lower bench. He stated this change has operational costs associated with it. One
suggestion is to expand the internal shuttle system and use a 'trolley system. The idea is to
expand the services through the summer months and run about ten hours a day. When the
total costs are added up, it doesn't seem like a lot of money. The town makes a contribution to
all the stakeholders and it wouldn't be out of the question to fund this system with the money
already being used to fund Ford Park user groups. He also discussed Betty Ford Way, the
central spine entry, the BFAG center building which would be no larger than 2,000 square feet
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 6
and would be a permanent home for the garden offices, and streetscape improvements near
Gore Creek.
Tjossem asked if they are looking into using Ford Park in the winter and having it be more a
year' round experience and have a snow shoe trail in winter instead of just a four month
amenity.
Oppenheimer said they haven't looked at that at this time but it's a great idea.
Donovan said the Gore Creek stream health is of great concern to the Council. There is still
vegetation needed in this area and this is a predominant way to improve stream health.
Oppenheimer said they have the same concerns. Donovan said they need to be careful about
putting this concept into the plans as it may be an assumed approval by the public.
Oppenheimer said they are trying to incorporate and expand the temporary art program into the
park. They are also trying to expand the garden feel throughout the park by adding more
garden areas to the park. Programming for lower bench restrooms and athletic field restroom
upgrades and additional maintenance requirements are being reviewed. He said the
operational design directives will focus on enhancing and expanding the transit services to the
park; the "trolley system" to restrict vehicle access to the lower bench; the lower bench turf area
is sacred ground; and an inter -agency management plan on how to manage the park.
Tom Braun, Braun Associates, said his job was to work with all the stakeholders and bring the
project through the entitlement process. He said they will be proposing an amendment to the
Ford Park Management Plan. He said most of the things can fit into the current master plan but
the BFAG Center doesn't, so they will be proposing an amendment to add this to the master
plan. He went through the schedule for getting this project through the development review
process during the next few months.
Daly said a few things were not discussed. He said there needs to be a comprehensive master
plan update including the VRD offices, tennis support, as well as concerts on the upper east
parking lot. He asked what the support is for usage long term and for increased use utilizing
existing facilities of the park with convenient transportation.
Moffet asked to be briefed at another time on the parking and shuttle system from last summer.
He feels parking is highly problematic. Moffet asked how many parking spaces will be used for
the helipad at the east parking lot. Zemler said the helipad eliminates three or four spaces
temporarily.
Daly gave an overview of Council concerns: pathways in the grass seating in the amphitheater;
dealing with acoustics between the amphitheater and athletic fields; the size of the television
monitors and how they are going to look; dealing with ADA access into the lower part of the
park; winter uses; and signage on the northern entry. Council wants to see the inter -agency
management agreement and costs and who will be covering what costs.
Donovan said she has a list of concerns that include adding public input as a stakeholder at the
stakeholder's meetings. She said this is a public use and the public needs to be part of the
master planning process. She has a concern of the long term financial plan of the BFAG and
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 7
the addition of a BFAG center as a year' round presence. She wants to make sure the BFAG is
viable in the future before adding a permanent garden center to the park. Additional concerns
included: on the conceptual drawing it looked like the bus shelter was removed from the drop
off; the covered terrace is one too many buildings for an open space park; an additional pavilion
may have additional interaction conflicts with other uses. She asked to have existing plans of
the park with overlays of proposed changes, particularly in the east part of the park and front
entry way. She said there were good ideas as well: the western bathrooms embedded into the
hill are great, a Ford tribute is wonderful; and the redesign of the ticket office area is a creative
solution.
Foley said this is a park and he is song to hear of more buildings being built in the park. The
buildings should be integrated into the berms and have as few of them as possible. He would
like to see some buffer to lower the noise between uses.
Tjossem said she is also concerned about the number of buildings. She said they had talked
about integrating uses into fewer buildings and now everyone wants his/her own building. She
wants to see less, as there are too many functions trying to be satisfied with too many buildings.
She asked if the common park area of the lower bench being sacred ground meant that no tents
would be allowed for special events and other uses. Oppenheimer said sacred ground meant
that no permanent modifications or structures would be on that area. There will still be
opportunities to have tents in that area.
Tjossem said a lot of recreation folks think they are being pushed out of the park during the
amphitheater special events. She said the bus transportation last year was a great first step.
The town needs to ramp up the education of the bus service to the park so that all the users in
the park know it's just not for amphitheater events but for all park users.
Harry Frampton, board member of the VVF, said trying to alleviate the noise is a huge issue.
Buffering the noise between the VRD events and the amphitheater uses is hard to do. The VVF
hired good sound consultants who said there is no good solution. There are major noise
problems between the 6pm and 8pm time slot for Bravo events. Highway noise is also an issue.
There is no good sound solution.
Moffet said it is inevitable that parking will be on the soccer fields for the 2015 Championships.
He said the design team needs to factor that in when planning for irrigation. He stated the VRD
events need a drop-off for their events as well.
Oppenheimer said there is a passenger drop-off at the bus drop-off area. Daly asked if there
was any public comment. There was no public comment on this item.
The eighth item on the agenda was the contract award for the Vail Golf and Nordic Center
Architectural Design contract award.
Greg Hall, Public Works Director, said there is a recommendation to award the architectural
design services for this project. He said the selection committee was made up of four members
of the Vail Recreation District (VRD) sub -committee, the VRD staff, Town of Vail staff and Jack
Hunn, who assisted in the selection process. They received twelve submittals from local firms,
who also had local sub -consultants. The short listing was a difficult process. He said some of
the major considerations were if the firms were committed to the remodel and budget; if they
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 8
had previous mountain construction experience; who had experience with designing golf and
Nordic facilities; and the design costs. The sub -committee's recommendation was to go with
Zehren and Associates with design costs of $273,000. This is a premium of $30,000 more than
the next bidder. He said Pierce Architects was in second place. Zehren and Associates has the
experience as they have designed three or four golf and Nordic centers.
Rogers said she has a problem with the recommendation as she has a desire to use local
vendors when possible. She said supporting people living and working in Vail is important and
is the right thing to do. She would rather the project award go to Pierce Architects as they have
their offices in Vail and their bid is lower. She asked if there are specialized courses that are so
unique that it would require an outside architect. There would have to be a good reason for her
to approve this recommendation.
Moffet said Council spent a fair amount of time on how to create economic vitality and one way
is to support local businesses, particularly if they are the low bid. He is perplexed on why the
sub -committee picked Zehren versus Pierce.
Foley said he was on the committee to pick the architect. He said the committee is greatly
appreciative of all the work Pierce has done. It was very clear the Zehren design was a step
above. It was a unanimous decision from the subcommittee. They would work with the town to
value engineer the project. Rogers said just because they've done it doesn't mean they are
better as it isn't as technical as building a fire house. Daly said Zehren has put together a team
that had more expertise and a better presentation. Tjossem said it was awkward for her as she
was ill that day and wasn't there. Her preference has always been to hire local. However, it
would be difficult to interject her opinion when she didn't sit through six hours of presentations.
She has to trust the subcommittee's recommendation.
Hall said Pierce Architects was bringing in an out-of-state golf architect to help his team. He
said some golf club houses are designed wrong and don't function well. It doesn't mean that
Pierce's design was not adequate as they used an outside golf architect to help them. Pierce
offered a 15% discount on their fees, which makes the cost differential more noticeable. Both
finalists had other consultants that helped give them a head start in the process. Zehren's team
has two members that worked with the town two years ago on another clubhouse proposal.
Pierce had a head start by working on the design prior to the RFP process. Both firms were
able to meet the deadlines. However, the deciding factor came down to experience versus
fees. Hall said the town will have a better value for their money with Zehren. There are more
hours included with Zehren's proposal.
Kurz said he has worked with Zehren and Associates on a number of projects and feels they
have the knowledge and expertise to build a golf and Nordic center not only as a golf and Nordic
center but as a place where other uses can be pursued by the town in the future. Their expertise
is something that will be very productive for the town.
Bill Pierce, Pierce Architects, stated he recognized his team doesn't have a lot of experience
with golf course clubhouses. That's why they teamed with a firm in Atlanta that does golf course
club houses around the world. They also didn't have expertise in commercial kitchens so they
also engaged Laurie Assmussen, who runs Donovan Pavilion, to help look at all the aspects of
a pavilion for circulation, views and other issues that needed to be addressed. The fees
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 9
included all the consultants' time. He said this is really a renovation project, not a new build and
is one of his team's specialties.
Moffet asked where Pierce's office was located. Pierce said about 100 yards from the golf
course club house.
Zehren said he expressed his team's interest in the project and the other architects and
consultants were in the audience with him. He feels they are part of the community as they
have been engaged in the Vail community for many years. The melding together of the different
disciplines to do a seamless kind of design is how they approached the project. Function and
presentation; including the technical aspects, needed the right team members. This is a project
they will put a lot of importance on. He said they have extensive remodeling experience
including Manor Vail, which was one of the most difficult remodels they have ever done, where
a building was put on top of an existing structure. They would like the opportunity to work with
the town.
Foley made a motion to authorize the Town Manager to enter into a contract for architectural
design services with Zehren Associates for $273,000 for the Vail Golf and Nordic Center project
and the motion was seconded by Kurz.
Rogers is voting against this motion as the town is a government and there is a responsibility of
the town to hire a local low bidder. She feels the price difference is significant. Moffet agrees
with Rogers. Daly said he has great personal respect for both principals involved. It's important
to have an experienced architect. He said the Council needs to support the vote of the selection
committee. Donovan said this was a difficult decision, but will vote for Zehren as they had
public support in the community and she can't go against the recommendation of the selection
committee.
A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-2 with Rogers and Moffet opposed.
The ninth item on the agenda was a request to continue the Ever Vail major subdivision and
Ordinance Nos. 7, 8, and 9, Series of 2011 be continued to the February 21, 2012, public
hearing by the applicant.
Moffet made a motion to table the Ever Vail major subdivision and Ordinance Nos. 7, 8, and 9,
Series of 2011, continued to the February 21, 2012, public hearing and the motion was
seconded by Foley. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0.
The tenth item on the agenda was adjournment.
As there was no further business, Foley made a motion to adjourn and the motion was
seconded by Donovan. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The
meeting adjourned at 8:52 p.m.
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 10
Attest:
rele Donaldson, Town Clerk
Respectfull submitted,
Andrew P. Daly, Mayor
SEAL
�.cQL ORP��
Town Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2012 Page 11