Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-06-19 Town Council MinutesVail Town Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, June 19, 2012 6:00 P.M. Vail Town Council Chambers The regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was called to order at approximately 6:00 P.M. by Mayor Andy Daly. Members present: Andy Daly, Mayor Kerry Donovan Kevin Foley Ludwig Kurz Greg Moffet Margaret Rogers Susie Tjossem Staff members: Stan Zemler, Town Manager Matt Mire, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant Town Manager The first item on the agenda was Citizen's Participation. Rick Sackbauer stated he lives in unincorporated Eagle County in West Vail. He urged the Council to bring back the Exchange Student Program in Vail with Vail's Sister City, Mt. Buller. He said there is immense value to having international travel available for our youth. He gave the town an Australian watercolor and asked that the Council consider providing a student exchange program for the 2015 Championships. Stephen Connolly noted many naysayers have come out of the woodwork. He said last week a number of people went to the Vail Recreation District (VRD) meeting. There was a lot of citizen input but no comment from VRD was offered. Regarding the 18`h Green and Vail Clubhouse renovation project, he said Ken Wilson, VRD board member and Mike Ortiz, VRD Director indicated the building at the Vail Golf Course Clubhouse was a town project, not a VRD project and they are the tenant. Connolly stated Debbie Webster said at a PEC meeting these changes to the 18th green would affect property values and the PEC board's response was that they don't consider property values when reviewing projects. He said no one attended the public meetings at VRD when they were discussing this building. He said there is a communication breakdown. He said Council would best serve the community by having a "time out" on this project. He referenced the diagram on the VRD website saying if the community would have seen the diagram earlier, they would have responded sooner. He said many communication notifications are not done in a timely manner and there needs to be a longer period of discussion prior to any decision making. Dale Bugby, a resident and business owner, said he had sent several emails to Council in the past couple of weeks. He hopes Council is listening. He asked if there was a planning process for the golf course. Daly said Council has delayed the meeting to discuss the golf course project for two weeks to allow for homeowners and golfers to provide feedback. Council asked staff to come up with alternatives to the parking and the 18`h green issues. Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 1 Jim Lamont, representing the Vail Homeowners Association (VHOA), stated he has provided a photograph with the 18`h green and the homes surrounding this project in it. He said the homeowner he is representing and the VHOA are not happy. He wants the neighborhood polled to see if they want this to be a different open space. He wants the approval processes reviewed as something has gone awry. The second item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda. On the consent agenda was the approval of an easement for the Booth Creek Trailhead Easement for the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD). Moffet made a motion to approve the consent agenda and the motion was seconded by Donovan. Foley stated this allows the ERWSD to clean up the Booth Creek Trailhead area. Daly stated this formalizes the easement and use of this site with the ERWSD as there hadn't been one in place. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The third item on the agenda was the Town Manager Report. Matt Mire, Town Attorney, stated Council had asked the town attorney to look into reviewing changes in two areas of the Town Charter: 1) the election date, change to coincide with the election dates of the County and State; and 2) the 50/50 split between sales tax and Capital Projects Fund. He said to have Town elections on the same date as the county and state, removing the words "following the first Monday" would establish the Town's regular election date as the first Tuesday in November. Also, as he reviewed the Charter, there were additional changes that could clear up the Charter as well including deleting the need for an Election Commission which is outdated, make the Charter gender neutral; adopt ordinances at a regular meeting and a special meeting but not at an emergency meeting; change the language to amend and provide that procedural requirements for initiative and referendum shall be established by ordinance, and if no ordinance addresses the issue at hand, by state statute. That allows the Town Clerk to take advantage of the specific signature verification and other procedures outlined in state law, unless the Town Council wishes to prescribe different procedures; Planning Commission and Environmental Commission. Currently, the Charter provides for two separate commissions, the Planning Commission and the Environmental Commission. Because the Planning and Environmental Commission assumes both of these roles, Council may wish to consider modifying the Charter to establish a single commission. Council agreed that the gender neutrality, election date language change, election commission deletion, procedure to adopt ordinances at regular and special meetings can be done but not at emergency meetings, referendum language updated to be established by ordinance rather than in the Charter, and to combine the Planning Commission and Environmental Commission into the Planning and Environmental Commission. Mire said another item was to update and change the capital program. The language is ambiguous and unclear. This section requires the town manager to create a capital program Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 2 but doesn't state how it is split. The Council should consider deleting this section entirely as it doesn't state it has to be 50/50 split. Daly said it provides for a super majority to approve, and there is merit as it causes Council to make a very conscious decision on how to split the funds. Mire said the five affirmative votes required in the Charter are to approve the budget but doesn't specify the percentage of the split of funds. On November 19, 1985, the voters passed an amendment to Section 9.4 which changed the wording of the section, but did not change the title. That language remains today: "The manager shall prepare a long-range capital program and submit same to the council no less than two (2) weeks prior to the submission of the budget. Such program shall include a statement as to the application of the sales tax revenues allocated by ordinance to the special revenue fund. Expenditure of these revenues other than for capital improvements and/or open space acquisition or improvements or for the payment of debt service on any obligations of the Town issued to finance the same shall require not less than five (5) affirmative votes of the council." As written, this Section is ambiguous, particularly the use of the phrase "these revenues." The language states that the Town Manager must prepare a capital program, which must include a statement as to the allocation of the tax revenue it does not actually require any particular allocation. From a legal perspective, there is no requirement in this Section that 50% of any revenues to be allocated to anything. Because of the ambiguity of Section 9.4, and because TABOR provides adequate protection of voter intent in the use of tax revenues, Section 9.4 should be deleted in its entirety according to Mire. Daly asked for a straw vote and discussion of this item. Kurz said to keep it the way it is. Tjossem said to clean it up if the intent is to do a 50/50 split. Foley asked that a separate work session be done to go over the background history and the details of how this evolved. He stated he wants to see the split stay 50/50 so infrastructure needs of the town won't suffer. Rogers said she isn't necessarily in favor of the 50/50 split. She wants to know the history as well. She also said there are many different accounts and other resources and revenues for many items and would like to see what pools of money are available to be used for various projects. Zemler said this is not a simple process and he doesn't feel the town can meet the 50/50 split, as the town has evolved, changed and expanded over the years. Saying "do the 50/50 split" without considering all the different funding resources and components is not practical nor is it that simple. The budget process needs some flexibility and can be done by policy. Daly said a separate discussion at a work session is needed. Donovan said she thinks it's important to keep this language in the Charter as it survives various Councils' decisions. She wants to be cognizant of the timing as it will have to go to the voters and on the November ballot. A work session will be done before the July 27 h deadline to the Eagle County deadline to get on the ballot. Zemler said another item under town manager report was Timber Ridge. He said an open Request for Proposal (RFP) was entertained. The town has been approached by Jen Wright and Gary Aa er =, who redeveloped the Ruins in the Cascade area. Staff is interested in extending them an exclusive for three months to look at this project and come up with %9Q-r"V-, Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 3 something the town may be interested in pursuing. Zemler said to keep this process simplistic at this point. There were two conditions to put forward to them: 1) retain the 600 bed deed restriction and 2) get back to the original intent of the town for this project which was to get it redeveloped, flip it and get rid of the debt. Rogers is against giving them a three month exclusive as it's unfair to other developers that were interested in the project and had previously submitted a proposal. Giving someone an exclusive right to develop Timber Ridge is not the right procedure at this time. She stated she is burned out on discussing Timber Ridge as this project has been going on for five years. She said she thought the Council had decided the town was going to fix it up, fill it up and hold it until the market turned around and not think about it anymore. Moffet wants to hear the proposal and wants to consider creative solutions. Kurz agrees with Moffet stating he doesn't think it would require a lot of staff time. He supported going forward with this proposal. Daly asked if it would require a lot of staff time. Zemler said it will take less staff time than the last year of coming up with one year of financing. He said the town could provide them with proformas and site plans that have been done on the project. Tjossem is comfortable with allowing this ninety day exclusive. Foley is wiling to listen to what they have to offer, but he was not in favor of an exclusive for three months. Donovan agreed with Foley as they haven't extended an exclusive to anyone else. Daly is okay with a ninety day exclusive. Daly, Kurz, Moffet and Tjossem supported moving forward with the exclusive proposal for three months. Zemler said if it turns into something more than anticipated, staff will let them know. The fourth item on the agenda was the discussion on the results of the May 2012, Town of Vail Draft Ballot Measure Survey. David Flaherty with Magellan Strategies reviewed the survey results with Council. He said the Council commissioned a survey conducted by Magellan Strategies to determine the amount of support and opposition for a draft ballot measure that would create a dedicated funding source for qualified athletic, cultural and other special events. If approved, the ballot measure would create two tax increases, a 1.5% increase to the lodging tax and a 0.5% increase to the sales tax. In addition after five years voters would have the opportunity to continue or reject the tax increases. The survey included an "informed" and "uninformed" ballot test. This approach measures voter opinion before and after being educated about the facts of the draft ballot measure. The survey yielded responses from 260 registered voters in the Town of Vail, Colorado. The interviews were conducted May 7th through May 31 st, 2012, and the survey has a margin of error of +/- 5.89% at the 95 percent confidence interval. The interviews were conducted by calling respondents on their home and cell phones, and online by sending email invitations and posting the survey on the Town of Vail website. The summary of results was outlined in the memorandum and presentation. Flaherty stated 58% of folks polled would reject this draft ballot measure to 37% who would approve the ballot measure at this time. He said there was not any significant movement for support when they educated folks on what this tax would do. When the five year time limit was discussed, there wasn't a lot of movement either. The numbers stayed approximately the same Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 4 throughout the poll. He said 58% opposed the ballot, 35% would approve it, 3% were undecided and 2% refused to answer or didn't know how they would vote. After the Bravo email went out to encourage voters to support the ballot measure, a majority of voters said they would still oppose it. Flaherty said it would be very unlikely that this ballot question would pass in November. The intensity of the no voters would be a strong opposition overall. The sub -group opposed was comprised mostly of male voters (55%) and male voters were not thrilled about this ballot measure. 57% of those polled said now is not the time to raise taxes. He said looking at the school board vote last November not passing, if school board measures don't pass, this would be more difficult to pass as the school board reaches a far broader group of voters. Stephen Connolly said the results go against his gut feeling throughout the survey. He thinks this ballot measure is great if it could be limited to a lodging tax. He said if the visitors will pay the tax and not locals, people would approve it. He thinks there needs to be more specific language and get rid of the sales tax. He said there were only 260 folks who responded to the survey. He said a referendum needs 400 votes. He doesn't feel this is a good cross section of the voters, as the poll was done in May when a lot of people are out of town after ski season. He wants them to look closer at the details and said he thinks a 1% lodging tax would pass. Mia Vlaar representing the Athletic, Cultural and Event (ACE) committee and the Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Council (VLMDAC), said the ACE committee met on Monday. She said they learned over 80% of the people polled loved special events and the economic vitality they bring to town. 58% didn't want the tax but 38% thought it was a good idea and there is something to that number. As a group, the ACE committee wants to see if this is still part of town funding or does Council want them to continue to educate the public. She reviewed the State of Colorado tourism marketing statistics. She asked for Council direction on where the ACE committee should go from here. Rogers said Connolly made some good points. The flaw was in the timing not the survey. This couldn't be a worst time for a poll, and doesn't reflect reality. The real problem was trying to get it on the ballot in November and a compressed time frame didn't allow for educating the public. She suggested educating the public during the next year to possibly get it on the ballot in 2013. Donovan said it's still a sample of the population. She stated this was a strong message from the voters. She respects the poll results and for now, there is not enough support for this. Until it changes significantly, it's not a good use of Council and staff time. Moffet said the politics being what they are; this would be a hard thing to accomplish at this time. He appreciated everything the committee did. Kurz said the result is too great to look at proceeding to a November ballot this fall. He said to move forward with this would do the community a disservice at this time. Vlaar asked if the committee should continue to work on this or not. Kurz said this is a worthwhile effort but the question is when to achieve it. Tjossem said she thinks they should continue to work on it. A lot of good work has been done and the bottom line is that special events are an economic vitality to the community. The question is how to pay for it. Kurz said Council knows economic development is important and that events are an important part of the community. Foley said the survey results were not what they wanted to see but the Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 5 lodging community was supportive of it. He said they should continue to educate the community. Flaherty said he appreciated that May is a difficult time to do a poll. He hoped the results were beneficial to the Council. He thanked Council for the opportunity to work for them. The fifth item on the agenda was an audit update for Comcast Field Operations. Matt Mire, Town Attorney, said the Council was in the middle of a franchise renewal process when they decided to stop and do an audit of the Comcast system. Council passed Resolution No. 18, Series of 2011, which approved a compliance agreement. The agreement would cover what needed to be fixed by December 31, 2011. When it was discovered that they couldn't fix some things until the snow was gone, they moved the deadline to after the spring of 2012 to make sure compliance was achieved and the franchise could be discussed after compliance was met. Compliance was to be achieved after the snow was gone. Braden went out on an audit compliance with Comcast. Mike Trueblood, Vice President of Field Operations for Comcast for Northern Colorado reviewed the audit results with Council per the memorandum attached to the agenda. Rogers asked if Braden and Mire were satisfied with the audit and if compliance had been met. Braden said yes that everything that was identified in the audit had been completed and then some. Mire said the franchise agreement was put on hold and now they can bring it forward to Council. Mire said the franchise agreement will have an eye on the level of service that has been raised to be competitive to other cable services in other cities. Tjossem said she had talked to Trueblood about dropping Universal Sports in the cable system in Vail. That is the only channel that brings to Vail all European ski racing and other international sports. He had told her to write a letter to Comcast stressing the importance of having this channel. She said this is important coming up to 2015 championships. Without that channel guests will be losing out on this event. Trueblood said Comcast is in negotiations with trying to get the multiple sport channels back in the line up. He said it would be important to get a letter of support to the right folks to help give them good reasons to bringing it back on the line up. He would help Council accomplish this. He said there were 250 drop areas versus 140 this year. They are trying to be more diligent and proactive in responding to issues. He introduced Dan Weary, who is the General Manager of the mountain areas of Colorado for Comcast who is working to help clear up issues as they come up. Donovan said since Mike Trueblood came on board they saw a significant change in working with Comcast. Daly said staff can begin negotiations regarding a new franchise agreement with Comcast for a future regular meeting. Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 6 The sixth item on the agenda was a discussion regarding the reallocation of Commission on Special Events (CSE) Event Funds for the later part of 2012. Sybill Navas, Special Events Coordinator, stated the CSE is requesting that Council review the recommendation for reallocation of funds for late year 2012, ask questions and provide direction. On June 6, the CSE reviewed the 12 responses to the RFP that was issued in order to reallocate the funds that have been returned to the budget due to cancellation of Mojo Man. The CSE evaluated each application according to the criteria developed jointly in cooperation with the Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Council. The events were defined on specific criteria and the grid scores were in the memorandum. The allocations amounts are based on how they were scored. The first event, Vail America Days, was given $15,000 to expand the fireworks display. This year, close proximity fireworks will be used in Vail Village for a twenty minute show along Meadow Drive. They hope this brings more people into town. The second event was the Tour of Vail and Crit Cycling event that received $15,000 to have a time trial that extended a two-day weekend to three-day weekend. The third event was Season of Song and it was allocated $10,000. This event will bring in many talented singer/songwriters, including proposed concerts in the Ford Amphitheater and it will take place over many days in Vail during the third week in September. The fourth event was the Living at Your Peak which was allocated $10,000 to be held the second week in September; they will work with Season of Song event producers to bring in a headliner for a grander celebration. And finally, the fifth event to receive funding was Vail Rocks! which will receive $15,000. Shannon Foley, producer of the Vail Rocks! event said they are very excited about bringing this event to Vail. This event raises funds for a rock and roll cancer foundation to help save lives. She said to date, they have had several events around the world; Mount Everest, Mount Kilimanjaro, Machu Picchu, and Mount Fuji are some of the places that have hosted this event. The foundation is based in Denver, Colorado. They have been asked to do an event closer to home. They have been scouting potential locations for two and a half years. They came to Vail and went to the top of Vail Mountain, scouting out various locations where they can play music, hike and other activities. The majority of registrations are currently from Dallas and Austin, Texas and the other hub states are California, New York and New Jersey. The admission fee covers the cost of the hike, EMT's, provide breakfast and lunch. Registrants make a pledge anywhere from $100 to $10,000 in exchange for various gifts from sponsors up to a rock star package, that includes meet and greets, free drinks, etc. based on their pledge amounts. The concert benefits the Love Hope Strength Foundation. Home base for the bone marrow drives is Red Rocks. There are a lot of festivals held around the United States that support this foundation. The result of the Vail event will help the First Children's Cancer Center in Tanzania. The number of children being treated has outgrown the size of the hospital and doctor who treats them. There is a need for additional funding for two more doctors of $80,000 for two years to handle the overflow of children. This event touches both local and global initiatives. They hope to expand the bone marrow drives and are doing them at Spring Back to Vail and Snow Daze. Sybill said the Commission on Special Events (CSE) are excited for this event as Vail Mountain is accessible to a much broader range of people to participate in the event. Shannon Foley said this puts Vail in the echelon group of mountains around the world for hosting this event. Rogers said Living at Your Peak was supposed to do a concert but she heard they are not doing a concert. Rob Levine said the event producers are trying to make it work but it hasn't worked Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 7 so far. They are looking into some other fun ways to have a community focused event to kick off Living at Your Peak. He said there are 120 participants paying $1,000 for a full, general session, including a key note session. There is anticipated to be an additional 300-500 people attending other sessions. There is a possibility to do something other than a concert. They understand that funds were clearly designated for a concert by the CSE. He suggested the CSE could review the proposal again. Shannon Foley suggested that they have musicians from her event that could be used for this event as well. Further discussion about other events, scoring and funding were done by Council. Moffet said he is not voting next year to give out any funding at the last minute as this is inappropriate. Tjossem said she agrees that this has opened their eyes to the inconsistencies. She said there was no communication between the Council, Vail Local Marketing District Advisory Council (VLMDAC) and the Commission on Special Events (CSE) and that some event producers are going to each one for funding. There is no cohesiveness in how funding is delegated. In order to have funding for an event, producers need to have permits in line, get approval in advance for venues being used, and have all their ducks in a row before any funding will be considered. Daly said he agrees with Tjossem and Moffet and it appeared that money was burning a whole in our pocket and this process will not happen again. Some of the events are not well thought through. Council wants the dollars carefully spent and the thought that goes into them are great opportunities for Vail. Rogers agreed and said she can't support the $10,000 funding for Living at Your Peak. She suggested they table the $10,000 pending a reapplication to the CSE for this event and receive their approval for another component. She said events should be well thought out and all their ducks solidly in a row before they ask for money. Some of that was not true for some of the presentations. Rogers made a motion to approve the reallocation request with the modification that the $60,000 be allocated according to the schedule presented and deleting the $10,000 for Living at Your Peak and that money be put in abeyance subject to further CSE review and approval for another component of their event. Donovan said they should not be too harsh on the CSE. As this cancellation was done at the last minute, the CSE had no control over what events or components of the events didn't happen. They have done a great job filling in the month of September, which was identified as a weak spot in the calendar and the town will have great things happening in September. Foley asked about why the MoJo Man event did not happen. Navas said the permit that was applied for with the Forest Service was not approved until late March and they couldn't announce the event until they had Forest Service approval. It was too late to market this event at that late date, as the event was to happen on Memorial Day weekend. There was no second to the motion and the motion died. Foley made a motion to approve the reallocations as outlined in the memorandum and the motion was seconded by Donovan. Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 8 Rogers asked if that included the $10,000 to Living at Your Peak event though the money was for a concert that is now not happening. Donovan stated this was to take the Council out of an administrative position and allowing the CSE to fund this event or not which is in their purview. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-1, with Rogers opposed. The seventh item on the agenda was a request to continue Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2012, an ordinance amending Chapter 12-6, Residential Districts, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Section 12- 3-7, Amendment, Vail Town Code, to establish a new zone district, Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto; and Resolution No. 7, Series of 2012, amending Chapter VII, Vail Village Sub -Areas, East Gore Creek Sub -Area (#6), Vail Village Master Plan, pursuant to Chapter VIII, Implementation and Amendment, Vail Village Master Plan, to include recommendations related to a new Vail Village Townhouse (VVT) District, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Rachel Dimond, Planner, stated the Community Development Department requested the Council grant a continuance of Resolution No. 7, Series of 2012, and the second reading of Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2012, to its July 17, 2012, public hearing to allow the applicant additional time to gather information for the Council's review. Moffet made motion to continue to Resolution No. 7, Series of 2012, and the second reading of Ordinance No. 2, Series of 2012, to the July 17, 2012, public hearing. The motion was seconded by Kurz. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. Foley congratulated Bill and his wife on their new baby. The eighth item on the agenda was first reading of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2012, an ordinance repealing and reenacting the approved development plan for Phase IV of Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn, pursuant to Article 12-9A-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for the conversion of one existing fractional fee club unit to one dwelling unit, located at 16 Vail Road (The Sebastian) / a portion of lots M, N, and O, Block 5D, Vail Village Filing 1, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Rachel Dimond, Planner, stated one owner wanted to convert from a fractional unit to a whole unit. She reviewed the memorandum and the criteria for this conversion. Staff believes that a unit of this size is typically put into a short term pool. On May 12, 2012, the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) recommended approval, with conditions, to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6. The PEC also approved, with conditions, the amendment to an existing conditional use permit for the reduction in fractional fee units. Should Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2012 be approved, The Sebastian will be permitted to increase the number of dwelling units from one to two and decrease the number of fractional fee units from 50 to 49. Daly asked how this benefits the town by changing from a fractional unit to a whole unit. Dominic Mauriello, with Mauriello and Associates, representing the applicant, said Mike Cuthbertson from Four Timbers Resort and Lance Thompson, General Manager for the Sebastian were in attendance for any additional questions for them. Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 2012 Page 9 Mauriello reviewed the power point presentation with Council. The Sebastian is a community partner and continues to contribute and add money into the community, as well as continuing to add improvements to the property. He said this is the only unit that doesn't have multiple shares in the fractional unit. This will make it more viable to putting it into the rental pool if it is a whole unit. The unit is under contract and the soon -to -be owner wants to add it to the rental pool with the services and amenities of The Sebastian. This unit complies with all the zoning regulations and complies with the criteria for review of a Major SDD Amendment. Daly asked what percentage of fractional units have been sold at the property. Mike Cuthbertson said 40% of the units were currently sold. This is the only unit which has a clean title. Jonathan Staufer, an adjacent property owner, stated he supported this proposal as The Sebastian has made their property one of the premier properties in Vail. This will allow for more hot beds and it is delightful to work with great community partners. Rogers made a motion to approve first reading of Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2012, with the condition and findings per the memorandum, "The applicant shall amend all applicable condominium maps to reflect the change in use and cause said maps to be recorded in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder within 90 days of approval of the major amendment to the special development district application". The motion was seconded by Tjossem. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 7-0. Zemler contacted Lance Thompson, General Manager of The Sebastian personnel about the garage doors being open. Thompson stated the garage was programmed to stay open for 15 minutes when in use. They have reprogrammed it so it now stays open for seven minutes and when they have substantial deliveries. They are continuing to work on improving this situation. The ninth item on the agenda was second reading of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2012, an ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map to rezone the Vail Golf Course Clubhouse Parcel from the Outdoor Recreation District to the General Use District, located at 1778 Sunburst Drive/Vail Golf Course Clubhouse Parcel, and setting forth details in regard thereto. Tjossem made a motion to continue the second reading of Ordinance No. 8, Series of 2012, to its July 3, 2012, public hearing and the motion was seconded by Moffet. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 7-0. The tenth item on the agenda was adjournment. As there was no further business, Foley made a motion to adjourn and the motion was seconded by Moffet. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respeo ul Submitted, Attest- 4 orW6i Donaldson, Town Clerk I , W-W-MEM, Town Council Meeting Minutes of June 19, 20IC Page 10 ADO ,•f